<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ39</td>
      <td>η'ρ</td>
      <td>(1.9 <sup>+1.7</sup><sub>-1.2</sub>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ40</td>
      <td>ωπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(2.1 ±0.6) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ41</td>
      <td>ωπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(7.3 ±1.2) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ42</td>
      <td>ωπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>2π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(8.7 ±2.4) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ43</td>
      <td>b<sub>1</sub><sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup></td>
      <td>(4.0 ±0.6) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ44</td>
      <td>ωf<sub>2</sub>(1270)</td>
      <td>(2.2 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ45</td>
      <td>ωπ<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.11 ±0.35) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ46</td>
      <td>ω3π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 8 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ47</td>
      <td>b<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(2.4 ±0.6) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ48</td>
      <td>ωη</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ49</td>
      <td>ωη'</td>
      <td>(3.2 <sup>+2.5</sup><sub>-2.1</sub>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ50</td>
      <td>φπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 4 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ51</td>
      <td>φπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(1.18 ±0.26) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ52</td>
      <td>φf<sub>0</sub>(980) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(7.5 ±3.3) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ53</td>
      <td>φη</td>
      <td>(3.10 ±0.31) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ54</td>
      <td>ηφ(2170), φ(2170) → φf<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 2.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ55</td>
      <td>φη'</td>
      <td>(1.54 ±0.20) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ56</td>
      <td>φf<sub>1</sub>(1285)</td>
      <td>(3.0 ±1.3) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ57</td>
      <td>φη(1405) → φπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>η</td>
      <td>(8.5 ±1.7) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ58</td>
      <td>φf<sub>2</sub>'(1525)</td>
      <td>(4.4 ±1.6) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ59</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(7.5 ±0.5) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ60</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(7.3 ±0.5) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ61</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(4.07 ±0.31) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ62</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 4.6 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ63</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>L</td>
      <td>(5.34 ±0.33) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ64</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>Lπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 3.0 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ65</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(2.6 ±1.3) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ66</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(6.6 ±2.8) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ67</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.7 ±0.6) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ68</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(2.2 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ69</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.26 ±0.09) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ70</td>
      <td>ωf<sub>0</sub>(1710) → ωK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(5.9 ±2.2) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ71</td>
      <td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(8.6 ±2.2) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ72</td>
      <td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(9.6 ±2.8) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ73</td>
      <td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(7.3 ±2.6) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ74</td>
      <td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>ρ<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(6.1 ±1.8) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ75</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(2.2 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ76</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>Lπ<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.3 ±0.6) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ77</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(3.0 ±1.3) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ78</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sup>±</sup>ρ(770)<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 7 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ79</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>ρ(770)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 7 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ80</td>
      <td>K<sup>∓</sup>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>±</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(7.0 ±2.9) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ81</td>
      <td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(3.6 ±1.8) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ82</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>η</td>
      <td>(1.3 ±0.5) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ83</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(2.2 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ84</td>
      <td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>2(1430)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.9 ±0.5) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ85</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>η</td>
      <td>(1.3 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ86</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>(1.9 ±0.9) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ87</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.00 ±0.31) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ88</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(2.9 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ89</td>
      <td>2(K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>(6.3 ±1.3) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ90</td>
      <td>2(K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.10 ±0.28) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ91</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>φ</td>
      <td>(7.0 ±1.6) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ92</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>φ</td>
      <td>(3.53 ±0.29) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ93</td>
      <td>K<sub>1</sub>(1270)<sup>±</sup>K<sup>∓</sup></td>
      <td>(1.00 ±0.28) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ94</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(6.7 ±2.5) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ95</td>
      <td>ηK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>, no ηφ</td>
      <td>(3.49 ±0.17) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ96</td>
      <td>ηK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 2.6 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ97</td>
      <td>X(1750)η → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>η</td>
      <td>(4.8 ±2.8) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ98</td>
      <td>K<sub>1</sub>(1400)<sup>±</sup>K<sup>∓</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 3.1 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ99</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>2(1430)<sup>±</sup>K<sup>∓</sup></td>
      <td>(7.1 <sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-0.9</sub>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ100</td>
      <td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>0 + c.c.</td>
      <td>(1.09 ±0.20) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ101</td>
      <td>ωK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(1.62 ±0.11) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ102</td>
      <td>ωK<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(7.0 ±0.5) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ103</td>
      <td>ωK<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(2.07 ±0.26) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ104</td>
      <td>ωK<sub>2</sub>(1430)<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(6.1 ±1.2) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ105</td>
      <td>ωK<sup>+</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.68 ±0.30) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ106</td>
      <td>ωK<sub>2</sub>(1430)<sup>0</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(5.8 ±2.2) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ107</td>
      <td>ωX(1440) → ωK<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(1.6 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ108</td>
      <td>ωX(1440) → ωK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.09 ±0.26) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ109</td>
      <td>ωf<sub>1</sub>(1285) → ωK<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(3.0 ±1.0) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ110</td>
      <td>ωf<sub>1</sub>(1285) → ωK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.2 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ111</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span></td>
      <td>(2.94 ±0.09) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ112</td>
      <td>n<span style="text-decoration: overline;">n</span></td>
      <td>(3.06 ±0.15) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ113</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.53 ±0.07) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ114</td>
      <td>N(940)<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> + c.c. → p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(6.4 <sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-1.3</sub>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ115</td>
      <td>N(1440)<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> + c.c. → p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(7.3 <sup>+1.7</sup><sub>-1.5</sub>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ116</td>
      <td>N(1520)<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> + c.c. → p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(6.4 <sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-1.8</sub>) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ117</td>
      <td>N(1535)<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> + c.c. → p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(2.5 ±1.0) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ118</td>
      <td>N(1650)<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> + c.c. → p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(3.8 <sup>+1.4</sup><sub>-1.7</sub>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ119</td>
      <td>N(1720)<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> + c.c. → p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.79 <sup>+0.26</sup><sub>-0.70</sub>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ120</td>
      <td>N(2300)<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> + c.c. → p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(2.6 <sup>+1.2</sup><sub>-0.7</sub>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ121</td>
      <td>N(2570)<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> + c.c. → p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(2.13 <sup>+0.40</sup><sub>-0.31</sub>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ122</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(6.0 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ123</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(2.7 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ124</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>η</td>
      <td>(6.0 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ125</td>
      <td>N(1535)<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> + c.c. → p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>η</td>
      <td>(4.5 <sup>+0.7</sup><sub>-0.6</sub>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ126</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(7.3 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ127</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>ρ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(5.0 ±2.2) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ128</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>ω</td>
      <td>(6.9 ±2.1) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ129</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>η'</td>
      <td>(1.10 ±0.13) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ130</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>φ</td>
      <td>(6.1 ±0.6) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ131</td>
      <td>φX(1835) → p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>φ</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.82 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ132</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>+</sup> or c.c.</td>
      <td>(2.48 ±0.17) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ133</td>
      <td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(3.2 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ134</td>
      <td>Λ<span style="text-decoration: overline;">Λ</span></td>
      <td>(3.81 ±0.13) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ135</td>
      <td>Λ<span style="text-decoration: overline;">Λ</span>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(1.4 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ136</td>
      <td>Λ<span style="text-decoration: overline;">Λ</span>η</td>
      <td>(2.43 ±0.32) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ137</td>
      <td>Λ(1670)<span style="text-decoration: overline;">Λ</span> → Λ<span style="text-decoration: overline;">Λ</span>η</td>
      <td>(1.3 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ138</td>
      <td>Λ<span style="text-decoration: overline;">Λ</span>η'</td>
      <td>(7.3 ±1.0) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ139</td>
      <td>Λ<span style="text-decoration: overline;">Λ</span>ω(782)</td>
      <td>(3.3 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ140</td>
      <td>Λ<span style="text-decoration: overline;">Λ</span>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(2.8 ±0.6) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ141</td>
      <td>Λ<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>(1.00 ±0.14) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ142</td>
      <td>Λ<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>K<sup>+</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(6.3 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ143</td>
      <td>Λ<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(1.8 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ144</td>
      <td>ΛnK<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(8.1 ±1.8) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ145</td>
      <td>Δ<sup>+</sup>+Δ<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(1.28 ±0.35) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ146</td>
      <td>ΛΣ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(1.40 ±0.13) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ147</td>
      <td>ΛΣ<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(1.54 ±0.14) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ148</td>
      <td>ΛΣ<sup>0</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(1.6 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ149</td>
      <td>ΛΣ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ150</td>
      <td>Σ<sup>0</sup><span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span>K<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(1.67 ±0.18) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ151</td>
      <td>Σ<sup>+</sup>-Σ<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(2.43 ±0.10) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ152</td>
      <td>Σ<sup>0</sup>-Σ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(2.35 ±0.09) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ153</td>
      <td>Σ<sup>-</sup>+Σ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>(2.82 ±0.09) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ154</td>
      <td>Σ<sup>+</sup>-Σ<sup>-</sup>η</td>
      <td>(9.6 ±2.4) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ155</td>
      <td>Σ<sup>+</sup>-Σ<sup>-</sup>ω</td>
      <td>(1.89 ±0.28) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ156</td>
      <td>Σ<sup>+</sup>-Σ<sup>-</sup>φ</td>
      <td>(3.0 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ157</td>
      <td>Σ(1385)<sup>+</sup>Σ(1385)<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>(8.5 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ158</td>
      <td>Σ(1385)<sup>-</sup>Σ(1385)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>(8.5 ±0.8) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ159</td>
      <td>Σ(1385)<sup>0</sup>Σ(1385)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(6.9 ±0.7) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ160</td>
      <td>Ξ<sup>-</sup>+Ξ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>(2.87 ±0.11) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ161</td>
      <td>Ξ<sup>0</sup>-Ξ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(2.3 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ162</td>
      <td>Ξ(1530)<sup>0</sup>Ξ(1530)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(6.8 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ163</td>
      <td>ΛΞ<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(3.9 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ164</td>
      <td>Ξ(1690)<sup>-</sup>Ξ<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>-</sup>ΛΞ<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(5.2 ±1.6) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ165</td>
      <td>Ξ(1820)<sup>-</sup>Ξ<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>-</sup>ΛΞ<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(1.20 ±0.32) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ166</td>
      <td>Ξ(1530)<sup>-</sup>Ξ(1530)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>(1.15 ±0.07) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ167</td>
      <td>Ξ(1530)<sup>-</sup>Ξ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>(7.0 ±1.2) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ168</td>
      <td>Ξ(1530)<sup>0</sup>Ξ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(5.3 ±0.5) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ169</td>
      <td>Σ<sup>0</sup>Ξ<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>(3.7 ±0.4) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ170</td>
      <td>Ω<sup>-</sup>Ω<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>(5.66 ±0.30) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ171</td>
      <td>η<sub>c</sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ172</td>
      <td>h<sub>c</sub>(1P)π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>(7.4 ±0.5) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ173</td>
      <td>Λ<sup>+</sup>p<sup>e</sup>e<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ174</td>
      <td>Θ(1540)Θ(1540) → K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>[a] &lt; 8.8 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ175</td>
      <td>Θ(1540)K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> → K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>[a] &lt; 1.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## $\psi(2S)$

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>176</sub></td><td>Θ(1540) K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> p → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> p K<sup>+</sup> n</td><td>[a] &lt; 7.0</td><td>× 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>177</sub></td><td>Θ(1540) K<sup>+</sup> n → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> p K<sup>+</sup> n</td><td>[a] &lt; 2.6</td><td>× 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>178</sub></td><td>Θ(1540) K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> p → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> p K<sup>-</sup> π</td><td>[a] &lt; 6.0</td><td>× 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr></table>

### Radiative decays

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>179</sub></td><td>γχ<sub>0</sub>(1P)</td><td>( 9.77 ±0.23 ) %</td><td>S=1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>180</sub></td><td>γχ<sub>1</sub>(1P)</td><td>( 9.75 ±0.27 ) %</td><td>S=1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>181</sub></td><td>γχ<sub>2</sub>(1P)</td><td>( 9.36 ±0.23 ) %</td><td>S=1.2</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>182</sub></td><td>γη<sub>c</sub>(1S)</td><td>( 3.6 ±0.5 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>S=1.3</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>183</sub></td><td>γη<sub>c</sub>(2S)</td><td>( 7 ±5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>184</sub></td><td>γπ<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.04 ±0.22 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>S=1.4</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>185</sub></td><td>γ2(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>( 4.0 ±0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>186</sub></td><td>γ3(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 1.7</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>187</sub></td><td>γη'(958)</td><td>( 1.24 ±0.04 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>188</sub></td><td>γf<sub>2</sub>(1270)</td><td>( 2.73 <sup>+0.29</sup><sub>-0.25</sub> ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>S=1.8</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>189</sub></td><td>γf<sub>0</sub>(1370) → γK<sup>-</sup> K</td><td>( 3.1 ±1.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>190</sub></td><td>γf<sub>0</sub>(1500)</td><td>( 9.3 ±1.9 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>191</sub></td><td>γf'<sub>2</sub>(1525)</td><td>( 3.3 ±0.8 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>192</sub></td><td>γf<sub>0</sub>(1710)</td><td>seen</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>193</sub></td><td>γf<sub>0</sub>(1710) → γππ</td><td>( 3.5 ±0.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>194</sub></td><td>γf<sub>0</sub>(1710) → γK<sup>-</sup> K</td><td>( 6.6 ±0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>195</sub></td><td>γf<sub>0</sub>(2100) → γππ</td><td>( 4.8 ±1.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>196</sub></td><td>γf<sub>0</sub>(2200) → γK<sup>-</sup> K</td><td>( 3.2 ±1.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>197</sub></td><td>γf<sub>j</sub>(2220) → γππ</td><td>&lt; 5.8</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>198</sub></td><td>γf<sub>j</sub>(2220) → γK<sup>-</sup> K</td><td>&lt; 9.5</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>199</sub></td><td>γη</td><td>( 9.2 ±1.8 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>200</sub></td><td>γηπ<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 8.7 ±2.1 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>201</sub></td><td>γη(1405)</td><td>seen</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>202</sub></td><td>γη(1405) → γK<sup>-</sup> Kπ</td><td>&lt; 9</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>203</sub></td><td>γη(1405) → γηπ<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 3.6 ±2.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>204</sub></td><td>γη(1405) → γf<sub>0</sub>(980) π<sup>0</sup> → γπ<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 5.0</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>205</sub></td><td>γη(1475)</td><td>seen</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>206</sub></td><td>γη(1475) → γK<sup>-</sup> Kπ</td><td>&lt; 1.4</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>207</sub></td><td>γη(1475) → γηπ<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 8.8</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>208</sub></td><td>γK<sup>+</sup>0 K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td><td>( 3.7 ±0.9 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>209</sub></td><td>γK<sup>+</sup>0 K<sup>+</sup>0</td><td>( 2.4 ±0.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>210</sub></td><td>γK<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td><td>( 2.6 ±0.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>211</sub></td><td>γK<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.9 ±0.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>212</sub></td><td>γK<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> 2(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 2.2</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>213</sub></td><td>γ2(K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 4</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>214</sub></td><td>γp<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span></td><td>( 3.9 ±0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>S=2.0</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>215</sub></td><td>γf<sub>2</sub>(1950) → γp<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span></td><td>( 1.20 ±0.22 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>216</sub></td><td>γf<sub>2</sub>(2150) → γp<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span></td><td>( 7.2 ±1.8 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>217</sub></td><td>γX(1835) → γp<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span></td><td>( 4.6 <sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-4.0</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>218</sub></td><td>γX → γp<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span></td><td>[b] &lt; 2</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>219</sub></td><td>γp<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span>π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 2.8 ±1.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>220</sub></td><td>γγ</td><td>&lt; 1.5</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>221</sub></td><td>γγJ/ψ</td><td>( 3.1 <sup>+1.0</sup><sub>-1.2</sub> ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>222</sub></td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>η'</td><td>( 1.90 ±0.26 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>223</sub></td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>η<sub>c</sub>(1S)</td><td>( 3.8 ±0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>224</sub></td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>χ<sub>c0</sub>(1P)</td><td>( 1.06 ±0.25 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>225</sub></td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>χ<sub>c1</sub>(1P)</td><td>( 8.5 ±0.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>226</sub></td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>χ<sub>c2</sub>(1P)</td><td>( 6.8 ±0.8 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

### Weak decays

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>227</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td><td>&lt; 1.4</td><td>× 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>228</sub></td><td>Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> Σ<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td><td>&lt; 1.4</td><td>× 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>229</sub></td><td>invisible</td><td>&lt; 1.6</td><td>%</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr></table>

[a] Θ(1540) is a hypothetical pentaquark state of 1.54 GeV/c² mass and a width of less than 25 MeV/c².

[b] For a narrow resonance in the range 2.2 < M(X) < 2.8 GeV.

## CONSTRAINED FIT INFORMATION

A multiparticle fit to $\chi_{c1}(1P)$, $\chi_{c0}(1P)$, $\chi_{c2}(1P)$, and $\psi(2S)$ with 4 total widths, a partial width, 25 combinations of partial widths obtained from integrated cross section, and 86 branching ratios uses 253 measurements to determine 49 parameters. The overall fit has a $\chi^2 = 389.6$ for 204 degrees of freedom.

The following off-diagonal array elements are the correlation coefficients $\langle\delta p_i \delta p_j\rangle/(\delta p_i \cdot \delta p_j)$, in percent, from the fit to parameters $p_i$, including the branching fractions, $x_i \equiv \Gamma_i/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$.

<table><tr><td>x<sub>8</sub></td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>9</sub></td><td>0 0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>12</sub></td><td>21 13 2</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>13</sub></td><td>22 5 1 28</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>14</sub></td><td>11 6 1 44 11</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>111</sub></td><td>0 0 0 3 2 1</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>179</sub></td><td>0 0 0 2 1 1 0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>180</sub></td><td>1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>181</sub></td><td>1 1 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0</td></tr><tr><td>Γ</td><td>-85 -4 -1 -29 -31 -15 -4 -1 -1 -2</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>7</sub></td><td>x<sub>8</sub></td><td>x<sub>9</sub></td><td>x<sub>12</sub></td><td>x<sub>13</sub></td><td>x<sub>14</sub></td><td>x<sub>111</sub></td><td>x<sub>179</sub></td><td>x<sub>180</sub></td><td>x<sub>181</sub></td></tr></table>

## FIT INFORMATION

A multiparticle fit to $\eta_c(1S)$, $J/\psi(1S)$, $\psi(2S)$, $h_c(1P)$, and $B^\pm$ with the total width, 10 combinations of partial widths obtained from integrated cross section, and 38 branching ratios uses 113 measurements to determine 19 parameters. The overall fit has a $\chi^2 = 184.6$ for 94 degrees of freedom.

## $\psi(2S)$ PARTIAL WIDTHS

<table><tr><td>Γ(hadrons)</td><td>Γ<sub>1</sub></td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>258 ±26</td><td>BAI</td><td>02B</td><td>BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>224 ±56</td><td>LUTH</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ(e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>Γ<sub>7</sub></td></tr></table>

2.33 ±0.04 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

2.29 ±0.06 OUR AVERAGE

2.23 ±0.10 ±0.02 1 ABLIKIM 15v BES3 4.0-4.4 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> J/ψ

2.338 ±0.037 ±0.096 ABLIKIM 08B BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → hadrons

2.330 ±0.036 ±0.110 ABLIKIM 06L BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → hadrons

2.44 ±0.21 2 BAI 02B BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>

2.14 ±0.21 ALEXANDER 89 RVUE See Γ mini-review

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

2.279 ±0.015 ±0.042 3 ANASHIN 18 KEDR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>

2.282 ±0.015 ±0.042 4 ANASHIN 18 KEDR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>

2.0 ±0.3 BRANDELIK 79c DASP e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>

2.1 ±0.3 5 LUTH 75 MRK1 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>

1 ABLIKIM 15v reports 2.213 ±0.018 ±0.099 keV from a measurement of $\langle\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+ e^-)\rangle \times [B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-)]$ assuming $B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = (34.95 \pm 0.45) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = (34.69 \pm 0.34) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 From a simultaneous fit to $e^+ e^-$, $\mu^+ \mu^-$, and hadronic channel, assuming $\Gamma_e = \Gamma_\mu = \Gamma_\tau/0.38847$.

3 Combining $\Gamma_e e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_\mu e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau e} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \mu} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \pi} e^+ e^-$, and $\Gamma_{\pi \tau} e^+ e^-$ from ANASHIN 18 with $\Gamma_e e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_\mu e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau e} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \mu} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \pi} e^+ e^-$, and $\Gamma_{\pi \tau} e^+ e^-$ from ANASHIN 12 and assuming lepton universality.

4 From the sum of $\Gamma_e e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_\mu e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau e} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \mu} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \pi} e^+ e^-$, and $\Gamma_{\pi \tau} e^+ e^-$ from ANASHIN 12, $\Gamma_e e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_\mu e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau e} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \mu} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \pi} e^+ e^-$, and $\Gamma_{\pi \tau} e^+ e^-$ from ANASHIN 18, and $\Gamma_e e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_\mu e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau e} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \mu} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \tau} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\tau \pi} e^+ e^-$, $\Gamma_{\pi \pi} e^+ e^-$, and $\Gamma_{\pi \tau} e^+ e^-$ from ANASHIN 07.

5 From a simultaneous fit to $e^+ e^-$, $\mu^+ \mu^-$, and hadronic channels assuming $\Gamma(e^+ e^-) = \Gamma(\mu^+ \mu^-)$.

<table><tr><td>Γ(γγ)</td><td>Γ<sub>220</sub></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>VALUE (eV)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;43</td><td>90</td><td>BRANDELIK</td><td>79c</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></table>

## $\psi(2S)$ (i) $\Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma(\text{total})$

This combination of a partial width with the partial width into $e^+ e^-$ and with the total width is obtained from the integrated cross section into channel(i) in the $e^+ e^-$ annihilation. We list only data that have not been used to determine the partial width $\Gamma(i)$ or the branching ratio $\Gamma(i)/\Gamma(\text{total})$.

<table><tr><td>Γ(hadrons) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>Γ<sub>1</sub>Γ<sub>7</sub>/Γ</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.233 ±0.015 ±0.042</td><td>1 ANASHIN 12 KEDR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → hadrons</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.2 ±0.4</td><td>ABRAMS 75 MRK1 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></table>

1 ANASHIN 12 reports the value 2.233 ±0.015 ±0.037 ±0.020 keV, where the third uncertainty is due to assumptions on the interference between the resonance and hadronic continuum. We combined the two systematic uncertainties.
<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> anything) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.3738 ± 0.0067 ± 0.0200</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>21S</td><td>BES3</td></tr></tbody></table><table><thead><tr><th>Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>21.2 ± 0.7 ± 1.2</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>18</td><td>KEDR</td></tr></tbody></table><table><thead><tr><th>Γ(μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>19.3 ± 0.3 ± 0.5</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>18</td><td>KEDR</td></tr></tbody></table><table><thead><tr><th>Γ(τ<sup>+</sup> τ<sup>-</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.0 ± 2.6</td><td>79</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>07 KEDR</td></tr></tbody></table><table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψ(1S)π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.808 ± 0.014 OUR FIT</td><td>EVTS</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>07 KEDR</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>21.2 ± 0.7 ± 1.2</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>18</td><td>KEDR</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>19.3 ± 0.3 ± 0.5</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>18</td><td>KEDR</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(τ<sup>+</sup> τ<sup>-</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.0 ± 2.6</td><td>79</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>07 KEDR</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.808 ± 0.014 OUR FIT</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.836 ± 0.025 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>EVTS</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψ(1S)π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.808 ± 0.014 OUR FIT</td><td>EVTS</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.836 ± 0.025 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.78 ± 0.12 ± 0.07</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.837 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.852 ± 0.010 ± 0.026</td><td>15.9k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 ± 0.09</td><td>3 BA1</td><td>98E BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.808 ± 0.014 OUR FIT</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.755 ± 0.048 ± 0.004</td><td>544</td><td>5 AUBERT</td><td>07AU BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.836 ± 0.025 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.78 ± 0.12 ± 0.07</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.837 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.852 ± 0.010 ± 0.026</td><td>15.9k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 ± 0.09</td><td>3 BA1</td><td>98E BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.836 ± 0.025 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.78 ± 0.12 ± 0.07</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.837 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.852 ± 0.010 ± 0.026</td><td>15.9k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 ± 0.09</td><td>3 BA1</td><td>98E BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.836 ± 0.025 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.78 ± 0.12 ± 0.07</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.837 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.852 ± 0.010 ± 0.026</td><td>15.9k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 ± 0.09</td><td>3 BA1</td><td>98E BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.836 ± 0.025 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.78 ± 0.12 ± 0.07</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.837 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.852 ± 0.010 ± 0.026</td><td>15.9k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 ± 0.09</td><td>3 BA1</td><td>98E BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.836 ± 0.025 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.78 ± 0.12 ± 0.07</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.837 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.852 ± 0.010 ± 0.026</td><td>15.9k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 ± 0.09</td><td>3 BA1</td><td>98E BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.836±0.025 (Error scaled by 1.3)</caption><thead><tr><th>0.836 ± 0.025 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.78 ± 0.12 ± 0.07</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.837 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.852 ± 0.010 ± 0.026</td><td>15.9k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 ± 0.09</td><td>3 BA1</td><td>98E BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_670.png" /></figure>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψ(1S)π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.425 ± 0.012 OUR FIT</td><td>EVTS</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>07 KEDR</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.413 ± 0.019 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.45 ± 0.13 ± 0.02</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>0.45 ± 0.12 ± 0.04</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>0.411 ± 0.008 ± 0.018</td><td>3.6k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.413 ± 0.019 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.51 ± 0.09 ± 0.02</td><td>142</td><td>3 LEES</td><td>18E BABR</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.413 ± 0.019 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.45 ± 0.13 ± 0.02</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>0.45 ± 0.12 ± 0.04</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>0.411 ± 0.008 ± 0.018</td><td>3.6k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.413 ± 0.019 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.51 ± 0.09 ± 0.02</td><td>142</td><td>3 LEES</td><td>18E BABR</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.413 ± 0.019 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.51 ± 0.09 ± 0.02</td><td>142</td><td>3 LEES</td><td>18E BABR</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψ(1S)η) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>78.6 ± 1.8 OUR FIT</td><td>EVTS</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>07 KEDR</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>78.6 ± 1.8 OUR FIT</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>87 ± 9 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>EVTS</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AU BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>87 ± 9 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>83 ± 25 ± 5</td><td>14</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AU BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>87 ± 9 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>88 ± 6 ± 7</td><td>291 ± 24</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψ(1S)π<sup>0</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8</td><td>90</td><td>&lt;37</td><td>ADAM</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(2(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>29.7 ± 2.2 ± 1.8</td><td>410</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AU BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>12.4 ± 1.8 ± 1.2</td><td>177</td><td>LEES</td><td>18E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>3π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>4π<sup>0</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.3 ± 2.3 ± 0.5</td><td>18</td><td>LEES</td><td>21C BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>4π<sup>0</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(ρ<sup>π</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.2</td><td>90</td><td>LEES</td><td>18E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>3π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(2(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.2 ± 3.3 ± 1.3</td><td>43</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06D BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(2(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)3π<sup>0</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>33 ± 5 ± 5</td><td>14k</td><td>LEES</td><td>21 BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)3π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(η(2π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.87 ± 1.41 ± 0.01</td><td>16</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AU BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)3π<sup>0</sup>γη</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.836 ± 0.025 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.78 ± 0.12 ± 0.07</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.837 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.852 ± 0.010 ± 0.026</td><td>15.9k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 ± 0.09</td><td>3 BA1</td><td>98E BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.836 ± 0.025 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.78 ± 0.12 ± 0.07</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.837 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.852 ± 0.010 ± 0.026</td><td>15.9k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 ± 0.09</td><td>3 BA1</td><td>98E BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.836 ± 0.025 OUR AVERAGE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.78 ± 0.12 ± 0.07</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.837 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.852 ± 0.010 ± 0.026</td><td>15.9k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>06 CLEO</td><td>3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 ± 0.09</td><td>3 BA1</td><td>98E BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(ηπ<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.85</td><td>90</td><td>LEES</td><td>18E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γη</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## $\psi(2S)$

$$ \Gamma(\eta\pi^+\pi^-3\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{35}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5</td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>21C</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma_{ISR}(\pi^+\pi^-3\pi^0\gamma)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 21C reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \eta\pi^+\pi^-3\pi^0) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\eta \to 2\gamma)] < 1.9 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\eta \to 2\gamma) = 39.36 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(\eta2(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{36}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5</td><td>90</td><td>14k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>21</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to 2(\pi^+\pi^-)3\pi^0\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 21 reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \eta2(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\eta \to 2\gamma)] < 1.9 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\eta \to 2\gamma) = 39.36 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(\omega\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{41}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.01±0.84±0.02</td><td>37</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AU</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to \omega\pi^+\pi^-\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AUBERT 07AU reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \omega\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)] = 2.69 \pm 0.73 \pm 0.16 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\omega\pi^+\pi^-2\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{42}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>20.2±5.6±0.1</td><td>14k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>21</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to 2(\pi^+\pi^-)3\pi^0\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 21 reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \omega\pi^+\pi^-2\pi^0) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)] = 18 \pm 4 \pm 3 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\omega\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{45}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.58±0.82±0.02</td><td>33</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>18E</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to \pi^+\pi^-3\pi^0\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 18t reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \omega\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)] = 2.3 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.2 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\omega\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{46}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>21C</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma_{ISR}(\pi^+\pi^-4\pi^0)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 21C reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \omega\pi^0) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)] < 1.6 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) = 89.2 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(\phi\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{51}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.55±0.19±0.01</td><td>19</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 12F reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \phi\phi(980) \to \pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.17 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.02 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

0.57±0.23±0.01 10 2 AUBERT, BE 06D BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-\gamma$

1 LEES 12F reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \phi\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.27 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.02 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Superseded by LEES 12F. AUBERT, BE 06D reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \phi\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.28 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.02 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\phi f_0(980) \to \pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{52}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.346±0.129±0.004</td><td>12</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to \pi^+\pi^-K^+K^-\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 12F reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \phi f_0(980) \to \pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.17 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.02 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

0.346±0.168±0.004 6±3 2 AUBERT 07AK BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to \pi^+\pi^-K^+K^-\gamma$

1 LEES 12F reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \phi f_0(980) \to \pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.17 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.02 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Superseded by LEES 12F. AUBERT, BE 06D reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \phi f_0(980) \to \pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.17 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.02 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(K^+K^-) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{59}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.147±0.035±0.005</td><td>66</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>15J</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to K^+K^-\gamma$</td></tr><tr><td>0.197±0.035±0.005</td><td>66</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>15J</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to K^+K^-\gamma$</td></tr><tr><td>0.35 ± 0.14 ± 0.03</td><td>11</td><td>3 LEES</td><td>13Q</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to K^+K^-\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 12F reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \phi f_0(980) \to \pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.17 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.02 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

0.147±0.035±0.005 66 1 LEES 15J BABR $e^+e^- \to K^+K^-\gamma$

0.197±0.035±0.005 66 2 LEES 15J BABR $e^+e^- \to K^+K^-\gamma$

0.35 ± 0.14 ± 0.03 11 3 LEES 13Q BABR $e^+e^- \to K^+K^-\gamma$

$1 \sin\phi < 0$.

$^2\sin\phi < 0$.

$^3$ Interference with non-resonant $K^+K^-$ production not taken into account.

$$ \Gamma(K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{60}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.92±0.30±0.06</td><td>133</td><td>LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to \pi^+\pi^-K^+K^-\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 12F reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \omega\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\psi(2S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)] = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value B(\eta \to 2\gamma) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}.

2.56±0.42±0.16 85 1 AUBERT 07AK BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to \pi^+\pi^-K^+K^-\gamma$

$^1$ Superseded by LEES 12F.

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{64}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.7</td><td>90</td><td>8</td><td>LEES</td><td>17A</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^0\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^+K^-\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{65}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.60±0.31±0.03</td><td>17</td><td>LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to \pi^0\pi^0 K^+K^-\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^+K^-\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{66}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.54±0.63±0.15</td><td>17</td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{67}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.0±1.4±0.4</td><td>17</td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{68}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.1±0.7±0.4</td><td>17</td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{69}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.4±1.3±0.3</td><td>32</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AU</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{76}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.92±1.27±0.15</td><td>14</td><td>LEES</td><td>17A</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^0\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K^*(892)^0\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{77}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.71±0.29±0.07</td><td>17</td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm\rho(770)\mp\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{78}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6</td><td>90</td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm\pi\mp\rho(770)^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{79}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6</td><td>90</td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^+ K^*(892)^-\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{81}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.46±4.05±0.90</td><td>17</td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^\mp K^*(892)^\pm\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{80}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.62±0.66±0.15</td><td>17</td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K_L^0 \eta) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{82}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.14±1.08±0.16</td><td>16</td><td>LEES</td><td>17A</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to K_S^0 K_L^0 \eta\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-\eta) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{85}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.05±1.80±0.01</td><td>7</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AU</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-\eta\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AUBERT 07AU reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-\eta) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\eta \to 2\gamma)] = 1.2 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.1 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\eta \to 2\gamma) = (39.36 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(K^+K^-2(\pi^+\pi^-)) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{86}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.4±2.1±0.3</td><td>26</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06D</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to K^+K^-2(\pi^+\pi^-)\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(2(K^+K^-)) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{89}7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.22±0.10±0.02</td><td>13</td><td>LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR $10.6 e^+e^- \to K^+K^-K^+K^-\gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>
$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{111}/\Gamma_7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.686 ±0.024</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td></tr></tbody></table>

0.63 ±0.05 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.67 ±0.12 ±0.02</td><td>43</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>130</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → p p̄γ</td></tr><tr><td>0.74 ±0.07 ±0.04</td><td>142</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>137</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → p p̄γ</td></tr><tr><td>0.579 ±0.038 ±0.036</td><td>27k</td><td>ANDREOTTI</td><td>07</td><td>E835 p p̄ → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>, J/ψX</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.70 ±0.17 ±0.03</td><td>22</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>06B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → p p̄γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ISR photon reconstructed in the detector

²ISR photon undetected

³Superseded by LEES 130

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{134}/\Gamma_7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.5 ±0.4 ±0.1</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BD</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ΛΛ̄γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

## ψ(2S) BRANCHING RATIOS

$$ \Gamma(\text{hadrons})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_1/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.9785 ±0.0013</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.9779 ±0.0015</td><td>1 BAI</td><td>02b</td><td>BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.981 ±0.003</td><td>1 LUTH</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Includes cascade decay into J/ψ(1S).

$$ \Gamma(\text{virtual}\gamma \rightarrow \text{hadrons})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_2/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0179 ±0.0004</td><td></td><td>1 LIAO</td><td>23</td><td>RVUE e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0166 ±0.0010</td><td>2,3 SETH</td><td>04</td><td>RVUE e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0199 ±0.0019</td><td>2 BAI</td><td>02b</td><td>BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.029 ±0.004</td><td>2 LUTH</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Using B(ψ(2S) → $\ell^+\ell^−$) = (0.794 ± 0.017)% and R = 2.26 ± 0.01 determined by a fit to data from Mark-I, DM2, BESII, KEDR, and BESIII.

²Included in Γ(hadrons)/Γ<sub>total</sub>.

³Using B(ψ(2S) → $\ell^+\ell^−$) = (0.73 ± 0.04)% from RPP-2002 and R = 2.28 ± 0.04 determined by a fit to data from BAI 00 and BAI 02C. Superseded by LIAO 23.

$$ \Gamma(\text{ggg})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_3/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.58 ±1.62</td><td>2.9 M</td><td>1 LIBBY</td><td>09</td><td>CLEO ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Calculated using Γ(γgg)/Γ(ggg) = 0.097 ± 0.026 ± 0.016 from LIBBY 09, B(ψ(2S) → X J/ψ) relative and absolute branching fractions from MENDEZ 08, B(ψ(2S) → γη<sub>C</sub>) from MITCHELL 09, and B(ψ(2S) → virtual γ → hadrons), B(ψ(2S) → γχ<sub>CJ</sub>), and B(ψ(2S) → $\ell^+\ell^−$) from PDG 08. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is largely uncorrelated with that of Γ(γgg)/Γ<sub>total</sub> LIBBY 09 measurement.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma gg)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_4/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.025 ±0.288</td><td>200 k</td><td>1 LIBBY</td><td>09</td><td>CLEO ψ(2S) → γ + hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Calculated using Γ(γgg)/Γ(ggg) = 0.097 ± 0.026 ± 0.016 from LIBBY 09. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is largely uncorrelated with that of Γ(ggg)/Γ<sub>total</sub> LIBBY 09 measurement.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma gg)/\Gamma(ggg) \qquad \Gamma_4/\Gamma_3 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.7 ±2.6 ±1.6</td><td>2.9 M</td><td>LIBBY</td><td>09</td><td>CLEO ψ(2S) → (γ +) hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\text{light hadrons})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.154 ±0.015</td><td></td><td>1 MENDEZ</td><td>08</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.169 ±0.026</td><td>2 ADAM</td><td>05A</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses B(ψ(2S) → J/ψX) from MENDEZ 08 and other branching fractions from PDG 07.

²Uses B(J/ψX) from ADAM 05A, B(χ<sub>CJ</sub>γ), B(η<sub>C</sub>γ) from ATHAR 04 and B($\ell^+\ell^−$) from PDG 04. Superseded by MENDEZ 08.

$$ \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_7/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>79.4 ± 2.2</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.3.</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>88 ±13</td><td>1 FELDMAN</td><td>77</td><td>RVUE e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From an overall fit assuming equal partial widths for e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> and μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>. For a measurement of the ratio see the entry Γ(μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>)/Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>) below. Includes LUTH 75, HILGER 75, BURMESTER 77.

$$ \Gamma(\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_8/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>80 ±6</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td colspan="3"></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma(e^+e^-) \qquad \Gamma_8/\Gamma_7 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.00 ±0.08</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td colspan="3"></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.89 ±0.16</td><td></td><td>BOYARSKI</td><td>75c</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\tau^+\tau^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_9/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>31 ±4</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>30.8 ±2.1 ±3.8</td><td></td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>06W</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Computed using PDG 02 value of B(ψ(2S) → hadrons) = 0.9810 ± 0.0030 to estimate the total number of ψ(2S) events.

## DECAYS INTO J/ψ(1S) AND ANYTHING

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{10}/\Gamma = (\Gamma_{12}+\Gamma_{13}+\Gamma_{14}+0.343\Gamma_{180}+0.195\Gamma_{181})/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.615 ±0.007</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.3.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.51 ±0.12</td><td></td><td>BRANDELIK</td><td>79c</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>X</td></tr><tr><td>0.57 ±0.08</td><td></td><td>ABRAMS</td><td>75b</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>X</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.644 ±0.006</td><td>±0.016</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>21Z</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → $\ell^+\ell^-$X</td></tr><tr><td>0.6254 ±0.0016 ±0.0155</td><td>1.1M</td><td>2 MENDEZ</td><td>08</td><td>CLEO ψ(2S) → $\ell^+\ell^-$X</td></tr><tr><td>0.5950 ±0.0015 ±0.0190</td><td>151k</td><td>ADAM</td><td>05A</td><td>CLEO Repl. by MENDEZ 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From a fit to the e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψX cross section between 3.645 and 3.891 GeV, with Γ(ee) and Γ fixed to the PDG 20 values of the cross particle fit which are correlated to "OUR FIT" value for B(ψ(2S) → J/ψX).

²Not independent from other measurements of MENDEZ 08.

$$ \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\text{anything}) \qquad \Gamma_7/\Gamma_{10} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.291 ±0.035</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.3.</td></tr></tbody></table>

1.28 ±0.04 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.22 ±0.02 ±0.05</td><td>5097 ±73</td><td>1 ANDREOTTI</td><td>05</td><td>E835 p p̄ → ψ(2S) →</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.28 ±0.03 ±0.02</td><td></td><td>1 AMBROGIANI</td><td>00A</td><td>E835 p p̄ → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.44 ±0.08 ±0.02</td><td></td><td>1 ARMSTRONG</td><td>97</td><td>E760 p̄p → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Using B(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>) = 0.0593 ± 0.0010.

## WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.28±0.04 (Error scaled by 1.6)

<figure><img src="image_671.png" /><figcaption>Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ(J/ψ(1S)anything) (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)

Γ<sub>7</sub>/Γ<sub>10</sub></figcaption></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\text{anything}) \qquad \Gamma_8/\Gamma_{10} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0130 ±0.0010</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.014 ±0.003</td><td></td><td>HILGER</td><td>75</td><td>SPEC e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\text{neutrals})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{11}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.254 ±0.005</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.6.</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{12}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.3469 ±0.0034</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr></tbody></table>

0.348 ±0.005 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.3498 ±0.0002 ±0.0045</td><td>20M</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13R</td><td>BES3 ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.3504 ±0.0007 ±0.0077</td><td>565k</td><td>MENDEZ</td><td>08</td><td>CLEO ψ(2S) → $\ell^+\ell^-$π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.323 ±0.014</td><td></td><td>BAI</td><td>02B</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.32 ±0.04</td><td></td><td>ABRAMS</td><td>75B</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.3354 ± 0.0014 ± 0.0110 60k ¹ADAM 05A CLEO Repl. by MENDEZ 08

¹ Not independent from other values reported by ADAM 05A.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.348±0.005 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_672.png" /></figure>

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

$$ \Gamma(e^{+}e^{-})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^{+}\pi^{-}) \qquad \Gamma_{7/\Gamma_{12}} $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.0229 ± 0.0006 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.3.

0.0252 ± 0.028 ± 0.0011 ¹AUBERT 02b BABR e⁺e⁻

¹ Using $B(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow e^{+}e^{-}) = 0.0593 \pm 0.0010$.

$$ \Gamma(\mu^{+}\mu^{-})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^{+}\pi^{-}) \qquad \Gamma_{8/\Gamma_{12}} $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.0230 ± 0.0017 OUR FIT

0.0228 ± 0.0018 OUR AVERAGE

0.0230 ± 0.0200 ± 0.0012

1 AAIJ 16γ LHCB $\Lambda_{b}^{0}$ → $\psi(2S)X$

0.0216 ± 0.0026 ± 0.0014

2 AUBERT 02b BABR e⁺e⁻

0.0327 ± 0.0077 ± 0.0072

2 GRIBUSHIN 96 FMPS 515 π⁻ Be → 2μX

¹ Using $B(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-}) = (5.961 \pm 0.033) \times 10^{-2}$.

² Using $B(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-}) = (5.88 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(\tau^{+}\tau^{-})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^{+}\pi^{-}) \qquad \Gamma_{9/\Gamma_{12}} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻³) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

8.8 ± 1.1 OUR FIT

8.73 ± 1.39 ± 1.57

BAI 02 BES e⁺e⁻

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\text{anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{12/\Gamma_{10}} $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.564 ± 0.004 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.7.

0.554 ± 0.008 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.

0.5604 ± 0.0009 ± 0.0062

565k MENDEZ 08 CLEO $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$

0.525 ± 0.009 ± 0.022

4k ANDREOTTI 05 E835 $\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi X$

0.536 ± 0.007 ± 0.016

20k 1,2 ABLIKIM 04b BES $\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi X$

0.496 ± 0.037

ARMSTRONG 97 E760 $\bar{p}\bar{p} \rightarrow \psi(2S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.5637 ± 0.0027 ± 0.0046 60k ADAM 05A CLEO Repl. by MENDEZ 08

¹ From a fit to the $J/\psi$ recoil mass spectra.

² ABLIKIM 04b quotes $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi X) / B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi \pi^{+}\pi^{-})$.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.554±0.008 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_673.png" /></figure>

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\text{neutrals})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^{+}\pi^{-}) \qquad \Gamma_{11/\Gamma_{12}} = (0.9761\Gamma_{13} + 0.719\Gamma_{14} + 0.343\Gamma_{180} + 0.195\Gamma_{181})/\Gamma_{12} $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.732 ± 0.013 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.7.

0.73 ± 0.09 TANENBAUM 76 MRK1 $e^{+}e^{-}$

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^{0}\pi^{0})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\text{anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{13/\Gamma_{10}} $$

VALUE EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.297 ± 0.005 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.7.

0.320 ± 0.012 OUR AVERAGE

0.300 ± 0.008 ± 0.022 1655 ± 44 ANDREOTTI 05 E835 $\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi X$

0.328 ± 0.013 ± 0.008 AMBROGIANI 00a E835 $\bar{p}\bar{p} \rightarrow \psi(2S)$

0.323 ± 0.033 ARMSTRONG 97 E760 $\bar{p}\bar{p} \rightarrow \psi(2S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.2829 ± 0.0012 ± 0.0056 61k MENDEZ 08 CLEO $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-} 2\pi^{0}$

0.2776 ± 0.0025 ± 0.0043 13.4k ADAM 05A CLEO Repl. by MENDEZ 08

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^{0}\pi^{0})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^{+}\pi^{-}) \qquad \Gamma_{13/\Gamma_{12}} $$

VALUE EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.526 ± 0.013 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.7.

0.513 ± 0.022 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.2.

0.5047 ± 0.0022 ± 0.0102 61k MENDEZ 08 CLEO $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-} 2\pi^{0}$

0.570 ± 0.009 ± 0.026 14k ¹ABLIKIM 04b BES $\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi X$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.4924 ± 0.0047 ± 0.0086 73k 2,3 ADAM 05A CLEO Repl. by MENDEZ 08

0.571 ± 0.018 ± 0.044 ⁴ANDREOTTI 05 E835 $\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi X$

0.53 ± 0.06

TANENBAUM 76 MRK1 $e^{+}e^{-}$

0.64 ± 0.15 ⁵HILGER 75 SPEC $e^{+}e^{-}$

¹ From a fit to the $J/\psi$ recoil mass spectra.

² Not independent from other values reported by ADAM 05A.

³ Using 13,217 $J/\psi\pi^{0}\pi^{0}$ and 60,010 $J/\psi\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ events.

⁴ Not independent from other values reported by ANDREOTTI 05.

⁵ Ignoring the $J/\psi(1S)\eta$ and $J/\psi(1S)\gamma\gamma$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{14/\Gamma} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻³) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

33.7 ± 0.6 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

32.9 ± 1.7 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.1. See the ideogram below.

33.75 ± 0.17 ± 0.86 68.2k ABLIKIM 12M BES3 $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-} 2\gamma$

29.8 ± 0.9 ± 2.3 5.7k BAI 04I BES2 $\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi\gamma\gamma$

25.5 ± 2.9 386 ¹OREGLIA 80 CBAL $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow J/\psi\gamma\gamma$

45 ± 12 17 ²BRANDELIK 79B DASP $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow J/\psi 2\gamma$

42 ± 6 164 ²BARTEL 78B CNTR $e^{+}e^{-}$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

34.3 ± 0.4 ± 0.9 18.4k ³MENDEZ 08 CLEO $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-}\eta$

32.5 ± 0.6 ± 1.1 2.8k ⁴ADAM 05A CLEO Repl. by MENDEZ 08

43 ± 8 44 TANENBAUM 76 MRK1 $e^{+}e^{-}$

¹ Recalculated by us using $B(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-}) = 0.1181 \pm 0.0020$.

² Recalculated by us using $B(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-}) = 0.0588 \pm 0.0010$.

³ Not independent from other measurements of MENDEZ 08.

⁴ Not independent from other values reported by ADAM 05A.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
32.9±1.7 (Error scaled by 2.1)

<figure><img src="image_674.png" /></figure>

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\text{anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{14/\Gamma_{10}} $$

VALUE EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.0549 ± 0.0009 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

0.058 ± 0.007 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below.

0.050 ± 0.006 ± 0.003 298 ± 20 ANDREOTTI 05 E835 $\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi X$

0.072 ± 0.009 AMBROGIANI 00a E835 $\bar{p}\bar{p} \rightarrow \psi(2S)$

0.061 ± 0.015 ARMSTRONG 97 E760 $\bar{p}\bar{p} \rightarrow \psi(2S)$
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.0549 ± 0.0006 ± 0.0009 18.4k 1 MENDEZ 08 CLEO ψ(2S) → ℓ⁺ℓ⁻η

0.0546 ± 0.0010 ± 0.0007 2.8k ADAM 05A CLEO Repl. by MENDEZ 08

¹ Not independent from other measurements of MENDEZ 08.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.058±0.007 (Error scaled by 1.4)

<figure><img src="image_675.png" /></figure>

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{14}/\Gamma_{12} $$

VALUE EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ14/Γ12
**0.0972±0.0016 OUR FIT** Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

**0.0979±0.0018 OUR AVERAGE**

<table><tr><td>0.0979±0.0010±0.0015</td><td>18.4k</td><td>MENDEZ</td><td>08</td><td>CLEO</td><td>ψ(2S) → ℓ⁺ℓ⁻η</td></tr><tr><td>0.098 ± 0.005 ± 0.010</td><td>2k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>04B</td><td>BES</td><td>ψ(2S) → J/ψX</td></tr><tr><td>0.091 ± 0.021</td><td></td><td>2 HIMEL</td><td>80</td><td>MRK2</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → ψ(2S)X</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.0968 ± 0.0019 ± 0.0013 2.8k 3 ADAM 05A CLEO Repl. by MENDEZ 08

0.095 ± 0.007 ± 0.007 4 ANDREOTTI 05 E835 ψ(2S) → J/ψX

¹ From a fit to the J/ψ recoil mass spectra.

² The value for B(ψ(2S) → J/ψ(1S)η) reported in HIMEL 80 is derived using B(ψ(2S)) → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻) = (33 ± 3)% and B(J/ψ(1S) → ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) = 0.138 ± 0.018. Calculated by us using B(J/ψ(1S) → ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) = (0.1181 ± 0.0020).

³ Not independent from other values reported by ADAM 05A.

⁴ Not independent from other values reported by ANDREOTTI 05.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{15}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>12.68±0.32 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>12.6 ± 0.2 ± 0.3</td><td>4.1k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>12M</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ℓ<sup>+</sup>ℓ<sup>-</sup>2γ</td></tr><tr><td>13.3 ± 0.8 ± 0.3</td><td>530</td><td>MENDEZ</td><td>08</td><td>CLEO</td><td>ψ(2S) → ℓ<sup>+</sup>ℓ<sup>-</sup>2γ</td></tr><tr><td>14.3 ± 1.4 ± 1.2</td><td>280</td><td>BAI</td><td>04I</td><td>BES2</td><td>ψ(2S) → J/ψγγ</td></tr><tr><td>14 ± 6</td><td>7</td><td>HIMEL</td><td>80</td><td>MRK2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>9 ± 2 ± 1</td><td>23</td><td>1 OREGLIA</td><td>80</td><td>CBAL</td><td>ψ(2S) → J/ψ2γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

13 ± 1 ± 1 88 ADAM 05A CLEO Repl. by MENDEZ 08

¹ Recalculated by us using B(J/ψ(1S) → ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) = 0.1181 ± 0.0020.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^0)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\text{anything}) \quad \Gamma_{15}/\Gamma_{10} = \Gamma_{15}/(\Gamma_{12}+\Gamma_{13}+\Gamma_{14}+0.343\Gamma_{180}+0.195\Gamma_{181}) $$

VALUE (units 10⁻²) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ15/Γ10
**• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •**

<table><tr><td>0.213 ± 0.012 ± 0.003</td><td>527</td><td>1 MENDEZ</td><td>08</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψγγ</td></tr><tr><td>0.22 ± 0.02 ± 0.01</td><td></td><td>2 ADAM</td><td>05A</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → J/ψγγ</td></tr></table>

¹ Not independent from other values reported by MENDEZ 08. Supersedes ADAM 05A.

² Not independent from other values reported by ADAM 05A.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^0)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{15}/\Gamma_{12} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻²) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ15/Γ12
**• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •**

<table><tr><td>0.380 ± 0.022 ± 0.005</td><td>527</td><td>1 MENDEZ</td><td>08</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψγγ</td></tr><tr><td>0.39 ± 0.04 ± 0.01</td><td></td><td>2 ADAM</td><td>05A</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → J/ψγγ</td></tr></table>

¹ Not independent from other values reported by MENDEZ 08. Supersedes ADAM 05A.

² Not independent from other values reported by ADAM 05A.

### HADRONIC DECAYS

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{16}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL% EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.78±0.26 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.76 ± 0.25 ± 0.06</td><td>30</td><td>1 METREVELI</td><td>12</td><td>ψ(2S) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>8 ± 5</td><td></td><td>BRANDELIK</td><td>79C</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<2.1 90 DOBBS 06A CLEO e⁺e⁻ → ψ(2S)

<5 90 FELDMAN 77 MRK1 e⁺e⁻

¹ Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration. Using ψ(3770) → π⁺π⁻ for continuum subtraction.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{17}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ17/Γ14
**2.01±0.17 OUR AVERAGE** Error includes scale factor of 1.7. See the ideogram below.

<table><tr><td>2.14±0.03<sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.11</sub></td><td>7k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>12H BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.81±0.18±0.19</td><td>260 ± 19</td><td>2 ABLIKIM</td><td>05J BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.88<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.15</sub>±0.28</td><td>194</td><td>ADAM</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.85±0.46</td><td>4</td><td>FRANKLIN</td><td>83 MRK2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → hadrons</td></tr></table>

¹ From ψ(2S) → π⁺π⁻π⁰ events directly. The quoted systematic error includes a contribution of 4% (added in quadrature) from the uncertainty on the number of ψ(2S) events.

² From a PW analysis of ψ(2S) → π⁺π⁻π⁰.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
2.01±0.17 (Error scaled by 1.7)

<figure><img src="image_676.png" /></figure>

(Confidence Level = 0.038)

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad (\text{units } 10^{-4}) $$

$$ \Gamma(\rho(770)\pi \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{18}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL% EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ18/Γ15
**0.32±0.12 OUR AVERAGE** Error includes scale factor of 1.8.

<table><tr><td>0.51±0.07±0.11</td><td></td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>05J BES2</td><td>ψ(2S) → ρ(770)π → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.24<sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.07</sub>±0.02</td><td>22</td><td>ADAM</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<0.83 90 1 FRANKLIN 83 MRK2 e⁺e⁻

<10 90 BARTEL 76 CNTR e⁺e⁻

<10 90 2 ABRAMS 75 MRK1 e⁺e⁻

¹ From a PW analysis of ψ(2S) → π⁺π⁻π⁰.

² Final state ρ⁰π⁰.

$$ \Gamma(\rho(2150)\pi \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{19}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.94±0.25<sup>+1.15</sup><sub>-0.34</sub></td><td></td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>05J BES2</td><td>ψ(2S) → ρ(2150)π → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a PW analysis of ψ(2S) → π⁺π⁻π⁰.

$$ \Gamma(\rho(\pi^{+}\pi^{-}))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{20}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ20/Γ21
**2.4±0.6 OUR AVERAGE** Error includes scale factor of 2.2.

<table><tr><td>2.2±0.2±0.2</td><td>308</td><td>BRIERE</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>TANENBAUM</td><td>78 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma(\rho^{0}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{21}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ21/Γ22
**2.2±0.6 OUR AVERAGE** Error includes scale factor of 1.4.

<table><tr><td>2.0±0.2±0.4</td><td>285.5</td><td>BRIERE</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>TANENBAUM</td><td>78 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma(2(\pi^{+}\pi^{-})\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{22}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>24.9 ± 0.7 ± 3.6</td><td>2173</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>07D BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>127 ± 12 ± 2</td><td>410</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AU BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr><tr><td>26.1 ± 0.7 ± 3.0</td><td>1703</td><td>BRIERE</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>
30 ± 8

42

FRANKLIN

83

MRK2 $e^+e^-$

1 AUBERT 07AU reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0)/(\Gamma_{\text{total}})] \times [\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow e^+e^-)] = (297 \pm 22 \pm 18) \times 10^{-4}$ keV which we divide by our best value $\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow e^+e^-) = 2.33 \pm 0.04$ keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
29±10 (Error scaled by 4.7)

<figure><img src="image_677.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(2(\pi^{+} \pi^{-}) \pi^{0}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \text{ (units } 10^{-4}} $$

(Confidence Level < 0.0001)

$\Gamma(\rho\sigma_2(1320)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{23}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL% EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$$ 2.55 \pm 0.73 \pm 0.47 \quad 112 \pm 31 \quad \text{BAI} \quad 04C \quad \text{BES2} $$

04C

BES2

$\psi(2S) \rightarrow 2(\pi^{+} \pi^{-}) \pi^{0}$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<2.3 90 BAI

98J

BES

$e^+e^-$

$\Gamma(3(\pi^+\pi^-)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{27}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

3.5 ±2.0 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.8.

$$ 5.45 \pm 0.42 \pm 0.87 \quad 671 \quad \text{ABLIKIM} \quad 05H \quad \text{BES2} $$

05H

BES2

$e^+e^- \rightarrow \psi(2S) \rightarrow 3(\pi^+\pi^-)$

$$ 1.5 \pm 1.0 \quad 1 \quad \text{TANENBAUM} \quad 78 \quad \text{MRK1} $$

1 \quad \text{TANENBAUM} \quad 78 \quad \text{MRK1}

MRK1

$e^+e^-$

¹Assuming entirely strong decay.

$\Gamma(3(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{29}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$$ 35 \pm 16 \quad 6 \quad \text{FRANKLIN} \quad 83 \quad \text{MRK2} $$

83

MRK2

$e^+e^- \rightarrow \text{hadrons}$

$\Gamma(\eta\pi^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{31}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$$ <1.6 \quad 90 \quad \text{BRIERE} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

05

CLEO

$e^+e^- \rightarrow \psi(2S) \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0$

$\Gamma(\eta\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{32}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$$ 9.5 \pm 0.7 \pm 1.5 \quad \text{1} \quad \text{BRIERE} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

1

CLEO

$e^+e^- \rightarrow \psi(2S) \rightarrow \text{hadr}$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 10.3 \pm 0.8 \pm 1.4 \quad 201.7 \quad \text{2} \quad \text{BRIERE} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

2

CLEO

$e^+e^- \rightarrow \psi(2S) \rightarrow \eta\gamma3(\eta \rightarrow \gamma\gamma)$

$$ 8.1 \pm 1.4 \pm 1.6 \quad 50.0 \quad \text{2} \quad \text{BRIERE} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

2

CLEO

$e^+e^- \rightarrow \psi(2S) \rightarrow \eta\gamma3(\eta \rightarrow 3\pi)$

$$ 10.3 \pm 0.8 \pm 1.4 \quad 201.7 \quad \text{2} \quad \text{BRIERE} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

2

CLEO

$e^+e^- \rightarrow \psi(2S) \rightarrow \eta\gamma3(\eta \rightarrow 3\pi)$

¹Average of $\eta \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ and $\eta \rightarrow 3\pi$.

²Not independent from other values reported by BRIERE 05.

$\Gamma(\rho\eta) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{37}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

2.2 ±0.6 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

$$ 3.0 \quad \begin{array}{c} +1.1 \\ -0.9 \end{array} \pm 0.2 \quad 18 \quad \text{ADAM} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

05

CLEO

$e^+e^- \rightarrow \psi(2S)$

$$ 1.78 \quad \begin{array}{c} +0.67 \\ -0.62 \end{array} \pm 0.17 \quad 13 \quad \text{ABLIKIM} \quad 04L \quad \text{BES} $$

04L

BES

$e^+e^- \rightarrow \psi(2S)$

$\Gamma(\eta'\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{38}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$$ 4.5 \pm 1.6 \pm 1.3 \quad 12.8 \quad \text{BRIERE} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

05

CLEO

$e^+e^- \rightarrow \psi(2S) \rightarrow \text{hadr}$

$\Gamma(\eta'\rho) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{39}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$$ 1.87 \quad \begin{array}{c} +1.64 \\ -1.11 \end{array} \pm 0.33 \quad 2 \quad \text{ABLIKIM} \quad 04L \quad \text{BES} $$

04L

BES

$e^+e^- \rightarrow \psi(2S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 1.02 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.24 \quad 143 \quad \text{1} \quad \text{ABLIKIM} \quad \text{17AK} \quad \text{BES3} $$

$$ 0.569 \pm 0.128 \pm 0.236 \quad 80 \quad \text{2} \quad \text{ABLIKIM} \quad \text{17AK} \quad \text{BES3} $$

¹Destructive-interference solution of a partial wave analysis of the decay $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\eta'$.

²Constructive-interference solution of a partial wave analysis of the decay $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\eta'$.

$\Gamma(\omega\pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{40}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

2.1 ±0.6 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 2.5 \quad \begin{array}{c} +1.2 \\ -1.0 \end{array} \pm 0.2 \quad 14 \quad \text{ADAM} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

$$ 1.87 \quad \begin{array}{c} +0.68 \\ -0.62 \end{array} \pm 0.28 \quad 14 \quad \text{ABLIKIM} \quad \text{04L} \quad \text{BES} $$

$\Gamma(\omega\pi^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{41}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

7.3 ±1.2 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.1.

See the ideogram below.

$$ 8.4 \pm 0.5 \pm 1.2 \quad 386 \quad \text{ABLIKIM} \quad \text{07D} \quad \text{BES2} $$

$$ 12.2 \pm 2.2 \pm 0.7 \quad 37 \quad \text{1} \quad \text{AUBERT} \quad \text{07AU} \quad \text{BABR} $$

$$ 8.2 \pm 0.5 \pm 0.7 \quad 391 \quad \text{BRIERE} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

$$ 4.8 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.7 \quad 100 \pm 22 \quad \text{2} \quad \text{BAI} \quad \text{03B} \quad \text{BES} $$

¹AUBERT 07AU quotes $\Gamma_{ee}^{\psi(2S)} \cdot B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow \omega\pi^+\pi^-) \cdot B(\omega \rightarrow 3\pi) = 2.69 \pm 0.73 \pm 0.16$ eV.

²Normalized to $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-) = 0.305 \pm 0.016$.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
7.3±1.2 (Error scaled by 2.1)

<figure><img src="image_678.png" /></figure>

(Confidence Level = 0.0034)

$$ \Gamma(\omega\pi^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \text{ (units } 10^{-4}} $$

$\Gamma(b_1^{\pm} \pi^{\mp}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{43}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

4.0 ±0.6 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

$$ 5.1 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.8 \quad 202 \quad \text{ABLIKIM} \quad \text{07D} \quad \text{BES2} $$

$$ 4.18 \quad \begin{array}{c} +0.43 \\ -0.42 \end{array} \pm 0.92 \quad 170 \quad \text{ADAM} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

$$ 3.2 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.5 \quad 61 \pm 11 \quad \text{1.2} \quad \text{BAI} \quad \text{03B} \quad \text{BES} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 5.2 \pm 0.8 \pm 1.0 \quad 1 \quad \text{BAI} \quad \text{99C} \quad \text{BES} $$

¹Assuming $B(b_1 \rightarrow \omega\pi) = 1$.

²Normalized to $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-) = 0.305 \pm 0.016$.

$\Gamma(\omega f_2(1270)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{44}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL% EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

2.2 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 2.3 \pm 0.5 \pm 0.4 \quad 57 \quad \text{ABLIKIM} \quad \text{07D} \quad \text{BES2} $$

$$ 2.05 \pm 0.41 \pm 0.38 \quad 62 \pm 12 \quad \text{BAI} \quad \text{04C} \quad \text{BES2} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <1.5 \quad 90 \quad \text{1} \quad \text{BAI} \quad \text{03B} \quad \text{BES} $$

$$ <1.7 \quad 90 \quad \text{2} \quad \text{BAI} \quad \text{98J} \quad \text{BES} $$

¹Normalized to $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-) = 0.305 \pm 0.016$.

$\Gamma(b_0^0 \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{47}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$$ 2.35 \quad \begin{array}{c} +0.47 \\ -0.42 \end{array} \pm 0.40 \quad 45 \quad \text{ADAM} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$\Gamma(\omega\eta) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{48}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵) CL%

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$$ <1.1 \quad 90 \quad \text{ADAM} \quad 05 \quad \text{CLEO} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <3.1 \quad 90 \quad \text{ABLIKIM} \quad \text{04K} \quad \text{BES} $$
Γ(ωη')/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>49/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.2<sup>+2.4</sup><sub>-2.0</sub><b>+0.7</b></td><td>4</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>04k</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Calculated combining η' → γρ and ηπ⁺π⁻ channels.

Γ(φπ⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>50/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;0.04</b></td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>12L</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.7</td><td>90</td><td>ADAM</td><td>05</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.4</td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>04k</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(φπ⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>51/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>1.18±0.26</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5.</td><td></td><td>See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>2.3 ±0.8 ±0.1</td><td>19 ±6</td><td>LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → <br>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr><tr><td>0.9 ±0.2 ±0.1</td><td>47.6</td><td>BRIERE</td><td>05</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) →</td></tr><tr><td>1.5 ±0.2 ±0.2</td><td>51.5 ±8.3</td><td>1 BAI</td><td>03b</td><td>BES K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.45±0.96±0.04</td><td>10 ±4</td><td>2,3 AUBERT</td><td>07AK</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> →</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Normalized to B(ψ(2S) → J/ψπ⁺π⁻) = 0.305 ± 0.016.

²Superseded by LEES 12F. AUBERT 07AK reports [Γ(ψ(2S) → φπ⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [Γ(ψ(2S) → e⁺e⁻)] = (0.57 ± 0.22 ± 0.04) × 10⁻³ keV which we divide by our best value Γ(ψ(2S) → e⁺e⁻) = 2.33 ± 0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³Using B(φ → K⁺K⁻) = (49.3 ± 0.6)%.

<figure><img src="image_679.png" /><figcaption>WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.18±0.26 (Error scaled by 1.5)</figcaption></figure>

Γ(φf₀(980) → π⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>52/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.75±0.33</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.6.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.5 ±0.5 ±0.1</td><td>12 ±4</td><td>LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> →</td></tr><tr><td>0.6 ±0.2 ±0.1</td><td>18.4 ±6.4</td><td>1 BAI</td><td>03b</td><td>BES ψ(2S) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.46±0.71±0.02</td><td>6 ±3</td><td>2,3 AUBERT</td><td>07AK</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> →</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Normalized to B(ψ(2S) → J/ψπ⁺π⁻) = 0.305 ± 0.016.

²Superseded by LEES 12F. AUBERT 07AK reports [Γ(ψ(2S) → φf₀(980) → π⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [Γ(ψ(2S) → e⁺e⁻)] = (0.34 ± 0.16 ± 0.04) × 10⁻³ keV which we divide by our best value Γ(ψ(2S) → e⁺e⁻) = 2.33 ± 0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³Using B(φ → K⁺K⁻) = (49.3 ± 0.6)%.

Γ(φη)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>53/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>3.10±0.31</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.14±0.23±0.23</td><td>0.2k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>12L</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.0 ±1.5<sup>-1.1</sup> ±0.4</td><td>6</td><td>ADAM</td><td>05</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.3 ±1.1 ±0.5</td><td>17</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>04k</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(ηφ(2170), φf₀(980), f₀ → π⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>54/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;2.2 x 10<sup>-6</sup></b></td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19l</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ηφf₀(980)</td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(φη')/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>55/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>1.54±0.20</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.51±0.16±0.12</td><td>201</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19BA</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.1 ±1.4 ±0.7</td><td>8</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>04k</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Calculated combining η' → γρ and ηπ⁺π⁻ channels.

Γ(φf₁(1285))/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>56/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>3.0±0.4±1.3</b></td><td>234</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>19BA</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ABLIKIM 19BA reports [Γ(ψ(2S) → φf₁(1285))/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(f₁(1285) → ηπ⁺π⁻)] = (1.03 ± 0.10 ± 0.09) × 10⁻⁵ which we divide by our best value B(f₁(1285) → ηπ⁺π⁻) = (35 ± 15) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

Γ(φη(1405) → φπ⁺π⁻η)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>57/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>8.46±1.37±0.92</b></td><td>195</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19BA</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(φf₂(1525))/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>58/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.44±0.12±0.11</b></td><td>20 ±6</td><td>BAI</td><td>04C</td><td>BES ψ(2S) → 2(K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.45</td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>98J</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(K⁺K⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>59/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>7.48±0.23±0.39</b></td><td>1.3k</td><td></td><td>1 METREVELI</td><td>12</td><td>BES3 ψ(2S) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6.2 ±1.5 ±0.2</td><td>66</td><td>2,3 LEES</td><td>15J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr><tr><td>8.3 ±1.5 ±0.2</td><td>66</td><td>3,4 LEES</td><td>15J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr><tr><td>6.3 ±0.6 ±0.3</td><td></td><td>5 DOBBS</td><td>06A</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>10 ±7</td><td></td><td>5 BRANDELIK</td><td>79c</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5</td><td>90</td><td>FELDMAN</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

²sinφ > 0.

³Using Γ(ψ(2S) → e⁺e⁻) = (2.37 ± 0.04) keV.

⁴sinφ < 0.

⁵Interference with non-resonant K⁺K⁻ production not taken into account.

Γ(K⁺K⁻π⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>60/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>7.3±0.5</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8.1±1.3±0.3</td><td>133</td><td>LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> →</td></tr><tr><td>7.1±0.3±0.4</td><td>817.2</td><td>BRIERE</td><td>05</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) →</td></tr><tr><td>16 ±4</td><td></td><td>1 TANENBAUM</td><td>78</td><td>MRK1 K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>11.0±1.9±0.2</td><td>85</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07AK</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> →</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;8.9</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>FRANKLIN</td><td>83</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assuming entirely strong decay.

²Superseded by LEES 12F. AUBERT 07AK reports [Γ(ψ(2S) → K⁺K⁻π⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [Γ(ψ(2S) → e⁺e⁻)] = (2.56 ± 0.42 ± 0.16) × 10⁻³ keV which we divide by our best value Γ(ψ(2S) → e⁺e⁻) = 2.33 ± 0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

Γ(K⁺K⁻π⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>61/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>4.07±0.16±0.26</b></td><td>0.9k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>12L</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8.9</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>FRANKLIN</td><td>83</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(K⁰S K⁰S)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>62/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;0.046</b></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>¹Forbidden by CP.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(K⁰S K⁰L)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>63/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>5.34±0.33</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.28±0.25±0.34</td><td>478 ±23</td><td>1 METREVELI</td><td>12</td><td>ψ(2S) → K⁰S K⁰L e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>5.8 ±0.8 ±0.4</td><td></td><td>DOBBS</td><td>06A</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>5.24±0.47±0.48</td><td>156 ±14</td><td>2 BAI</td><td>04b</td><td>BES2 ψ(2S) → K⁰S K⁰L e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

²Using B(K⁰S → π⁺π⁻) = 0.6860 ± 0.0027.
$\Gamma(K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁶⁹/Γ

12.6 ± 0.9 OUR AVERAGE

18.9 ± 5.7 ± 0.3 32

1 AUBERT 07AU BABR 10.6 $e^+ e^- \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0 \gamma$

11.7 ± 1.0 ± 1.5 597

ABLIKIM 06G BES2 $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$

12.7 ± 0.5 ± 1.0 711.6

BRIERE 05 CLEO $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$

¹AUBERT 07AU reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+ e^-)] = (44 \pm 13 \pm 3) \times 10^{-4}$ keV which we divide by our best value $\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+ e^-) = 2.33 \pm 0.04$ keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$\Gamma(\omega f_0(1710) \to \omega K^+ K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁷⁰/Γ

5.9 ± 2.0 ± 0.9 19

ABLIKIM 06G BES2 $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$

$\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K^- \pi^+ \pi^0 + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁷¹/Γ

8.6 ± 1.3 ± 1.8 238

ABLIKIM 06G BES2 $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$

$\Gamma(K^*(892)^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁷²/Γ

9.6 ± 2.2 ± 1.7 133

ABLIKIM 06G BES2 $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$

$\Gamma(K^*(892)^+ K^- \rho^0 + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁷³/Γ

7.3 ± 2.2 ± 1.4 78

ABLIKIM 06G BES2 $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$

$\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K^- \rho^+ + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁷⁴/Γ

6.1 ± 1.3 ± 1.2 125

ABLIKIM 06G BES2 $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$

$\Gamma(K_5^0 K_5^0 \pi^+ \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁷⁵/Γ

2.20 ± 0.25 ± 0.37 83 ± 9

ABLIKIM 05O BES2 $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

$\Gamma(K^+ K^- \rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁸³/Γ

2.2 ± 0.2 ± 0.4 223.8

BRIERE 05 CLEO $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^-$

$\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \bar{K}_2(1430)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL% EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁸⁴/Γ

1.86 ± 0.32 ± 0.43 93 ± 16

BAI 04C $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^-$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1.2 90

BAI 98J BES $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

$\Gamma(K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻³) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁸⁵/Γ

1.3 ± 0.7 ± 0.1 7

1 AUBERT 07AU BABR 10.6 $e^+ e^- \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \eta \gamma$

¹AUBERT 07AU quotes $\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to B(\psi(2S) \to 2(\pi^+ \pi^-)\eta) \cdot B(\eta \to \gamma\gamma) = 1.2 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.1$ eV.

$\Gamma(K^+ K^- 2(\pi^+ \pi^-)\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁸⁷/Γ

10.0 ± 2.5 ± 1.8 65

ABLIKIM 07D BES2 $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

$\Gamma(K^+ K^*(892)^- + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵) CL% EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁸⁸/Γ

2.9 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

3.18 ± 0.30 + 0.26 - 0.31 0.2k ABLIKIM 12L BES3 $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

2.9 + 1.3 - 1.7 ± 0.4 9.6 ± 4.2 ABLIKIM 05I BES2 $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

1.3 + 1.0 - 0.7 ± 0.3 7 ADAM 05 CLEO $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<5.4 90

FRANKLIN 83 MRK2 $e^+ e^- \to \text{hadrons}$

$\Gamma(2(K^+ K^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁸⁹/Γ

0.63 ± 0.13 OUR AVERAGE

0.9 ± 0.4 ± 0.1 13
0.6 ± 0.1 ± 0.1 59.2

LEES 12F BABR 10.6 $e^+ e^- \to 2(K^+ K^-)\gamma$
BRIERE 05 CLEO $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S) \to 2(K^+ K^-)$

$\Gamma(2(K^+ K^-)\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁹⁰/Γ

1.1 ± 0.2 ± 0.2 44.7

BRIERE 05 CLEO $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S) \to 2(K^+ K^-)\pi^0$

$\Gamma(K^+ K^- \phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁹¹/Γ

0.70 ± 0.16 OUR AVERAGE

0.8 ± 0.2 ± 0.1 36.8

BRIERE 05 CLEO $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S) \to 2(K^+ K^-)$

0.6 ± 0.2 ± 0.1 16.1 ± 5.0

1 BAI 03B BES $\psi(2S) \to 2(K^+ K^-)$

¹Normalized to $B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi\pi^+ \pi^-) = 0.305 \pm 0.016$.

$\Gamma(K_5^0 K_5^0 \phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁹²/Γ

0.353 ± 0.020 ± 0.021 687

1 ABLIKIM 23BA BES3 $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S) \to K_5^0 K_5^0 K^+ K^-$

¹Solution with a constructive interference of the signal with the continuum background.

$\Gamma(K_1(1270) \pm K \bar{\kappa})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁹³/Γ

10.0 ± 1.8 ± 2.1 1

1 BAI 99C BES $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

¹Assuming $B(K_1(1270) \to K\rho) = 0.42 \pm 0.06$

$\Gamma(K^+ \bar{K}^*(892)^0 \pi^- + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁹⁴/Γ

6.7 ± 2.5

TANENBAUM 78 MRK1 $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \gamma\gamma$

$\Gamma(\eta K^+ K^-, \text{no } \eta\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵) CL% EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁹⁵/Γ

3.49 ± 0.09 ± 0.15 1.8k

1 ABLIKIM 20F BES3 $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \gamma\gamma$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

3.08 ± 0.29 ± 0.25 0.3k

1.2 ABLIKIM 12L BES3 $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \gamma\gamma$

<13 90

BRIERE 05 CLEO $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$

¹Excluding $\eta\phi$.

²Superseded by ABLIKIM 20F.

$\Gamma(\eta K^+ K^-) \times (\Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}})$

VALUE (eV) CL% DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁹⁶/Γ

<0.6 90

1 LEES 23 BABR $e^+ e^- \to \gamma_{ISR} \text{hadrons}$

¹LEES 23 reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \to \eta K^+ K^-) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \to e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\eta \to 3\pi^0)] < 0.2 \text{ eV}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\eta \to 3\pi^0) = 32.57 \times 10^{-2}$.

$\Gamma(X(1750)\eta \to K^+ K^- \eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵) CL% DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁹⁷/Γ

4.8 ± 1.0 ± 2.6

ABLIKIM 20F BES3 $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \eta$

$\Gamma(K_1(1400) \pm K \bar{\kappa})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL% DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁹⁸/Γ

<3.1 90

1 BAI 99C BES3 $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

¹Assuming $B(K_1(1400) \to K^*\pi^-) = 0.94 \pm 0.06$

$\Gamma(K_2^+(1430) \pm K \bar{\kappa})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ⁹⁹/Γ

7.12 ± 0.62 + 1.13 - 0.61 251 ± 22

ABLIKIM 12L BES3 $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

$\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \bar{K}^0 + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ¹⁰⁰/Γ

10.9 ± 2.0 OUR AVERAGE

13.3 + 2.4 - 2.8 ± 1.7

ABLIKIM 05I BES2 $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

9.2 + 2.7 - 2.2 ± 0.9

ADAM 05 CLEO $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

$\Gamma(K^+ K^*(892)^- + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \bar{K}^0 + \text{c.c.})$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ¹⁰⁰/Γ

0.16 ± 0.06 OUR AVERAGE

0.22 + 0.10 - 0.14

ABLIKIM 05I BES2 $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

0.14 + 0.08 - 0.06

ADAM 05 CLEO $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S)$

$\Gamma(\omega K^+ K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ¹⁰¹/Γ

1.62 ± 0.11 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

1.56 ± 0.04 ± 0.11 2.8k

ABLIKIM 14G BES3 $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$

2.38 ± 0.37 ± 0.29 78

ABLIKIM 06G BES2 $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$

1.9 ± 0.3 ± 0.3 76.8

BRIERE 05 CLEO $e^+ e^- \to \psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$

1.5 ± 0.3 ± 0.2 23

1 BAI 03B BES $\psi(2S) \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$
<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ωK<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>102</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>102</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.04 ± 0.39 ± 0.36</td><td>1.5k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>21AL BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ωK*(892) + K<sup>-</sup> + c.c.)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>103</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>103</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>20.7 ± 2.6 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>18.9 ± 2.9 ± 2.2</td><td>396</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13M BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → ωK<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>22.6 ± 3.0 ± 2.4</td><td>535</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13M BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → ωK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ωK<sup>2</sup>(1430) + K<sup>-</sup> + c.c.)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>104</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>104</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>6.1 ± 1.2 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>6.39 ± 1.50 ± 0.78</td><td>128</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13M BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → ωK<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.86 ± 1.61 ± 0.83</td><td>143</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13M BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → ωK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ωR*(892<sup>0</sup> K<sup>0</sup>))/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>105</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>105</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>16.8 ± 2.5 ± 1.6</td><td>356</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13M BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → ωK<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ωR<sup>2</sup>(1430<sup>0</sup> K<sup>0</sup>))/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>106</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>106</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.82 ± 2.08 ± 0.72</td><td>116</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13M BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → ωK<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ωX(1440) → ωK<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> + c.c.)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>107</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>107</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.60 ± 0.27 ± 0.24</td><td>109</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13M BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → ωK<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹X(1440) compatible with η(1405) and η(1475). A f₁(1420) is also possible.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ωX(1440) → ωK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>108</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>108</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.09 ± 0.20 ± 0.16</td><td>82</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13M BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → ωK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹X(1440) compatible with η(1405) and η(1475). A f₁(1420) is also possible.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ωf<sub>1</sub>(1285) → ωK<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> + c.c.)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>109</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>109</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.302 ± 0.098 ± 0.027</td><td>22</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13M BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → ωK<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Statistical significance 4.5 σ. This measurement is equivalent to a limit of < 0.478 × 10⁻⁵ at 90% C.L.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ωf<sub>1</sub>(1285) → ωK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>110</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>110</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.125 ± 0.070 ± 0.013</td><td>10</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13M BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → ωK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Statistical significance 3.2 σ. This measurement is equivalent to a limit of < 0.221 × 10⁻⁵ at 90% C.L.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ρP)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>111</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>111</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.94 ± 0.09 OUR FIT</td><td colspan="5">Error includes scale factor of 1.3.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(3.02 ± 0.08 OUR AVERAGE)</th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>111</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>111</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.05 ± 0.02 ± 0.12</td><td>19k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>18T BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pP</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.08 ± 0.05 ± 0.18</td><td>4.5k</td><td>1 DOBBS</td><td>14</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pP</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.36 ± 0.09 ± 0.25</td><td>1.6k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>07c BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pP</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.87 ± 0.12 ± 0.15</td><td>557</td><td>PEDLAR</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pP</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.4 ± 0.8</td><td>4</td><td>BRANDELK</td><td>79c DASP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pP</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.3 ± 0.7</td><td></td><td>FELDMAN</td><td>77 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pP</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Using CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ρP)/Γ(J/ψ(15)π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>112</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>112</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.49 ± 0.28 OUR FIT</td><td colspan="5">Error includes scale factor of 1.3.</td></tr><tr><td>6.98 ± 0.49 ± 0.97</td><td></td><td>BAI</td><td>01 BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pP</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(nP)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>112</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>112</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.06 ± 0.06 ± 0.14</td><td>6k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>18T BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → nπ</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ρPπ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>113</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>113</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>1.53 ± 0.07 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.65 ± 0.03 ± 0.15</td><td>4.5k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13A BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pPπ<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.54 ± 0.06 ± 0.06</td><td>948</td><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>10 CLEO</td><td>ψ(2S) → π<sup>0</sup>pP</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.32 ± 0.10 ± 0.15</td><td>256</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>05E BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pPγγ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.4 ± 0.5</td><td>9</td><td>FRANKLIN</td><td>83 MRK2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Computed using B(π⁰ → γγ) = (98.80 ± 0.03)%.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(N(940)P + c.c. → pPπ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>114</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>114</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.42 ± 0.20 ± 1.78</td><td>1.9k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13A BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pPπ<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From a fit of π⁰pP data to eight distinct intermediate Np resonant states.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(N(1440)P + c.c. → pPπ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>115</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>115</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead></table>

7.3 ± 1.7 / -1.5 OUR AVERAGE

$$3.58 \pm 0.25^{+1.59}_{-0.84} \quad 1.1k \quad 1 \text{ ABLIKIM} \quad 13A \quad \text{BES3} \quad \psi(2S) \rightarrow p\bar{p}\pi^0$$

$$8.1 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.3 \quad 474 \quad 2 \text{ ALEXANDER} \quad 10 \quad \text{CLEO} \quad \psi(2S) \rightarrow \pi^0 p\bar{p}$$

¹From a fit of π⁰pP data to eight distinct intermediate Np resonant states.

²From a fit of the pP and pπ⁰ mass distributions to a combination of N(1440)P, a broad pP enhancement around 2100 MeV, and two other broad, unestablished resonances.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(N(1520)P + c.c. → pPπ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>116</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>116</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.64 ± 0.05<sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.17</sub></td><td>0.2k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13A BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pPπ<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From a fit of π⁰pP data to eight distinct intermediate Np resonant states.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(N(1535)P + c.c. → pPπ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>117</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>117</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.47 ± 0.28<sup>+0.99</sup><sub>-0.97</sub></td><td>0.7k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13A BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pPπ<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From a fit of π⁰pP data to eight distinct intermediate Np resonant states.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(N(1650)P + c.c. → pPπ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>118</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>118</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.76 ± 0.28<sup>+1.37</sup><sub>-1.66</sub></td><td>1.1k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13A BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pPπ<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From a fit of π⁰pP data to eight distinct intermediate Np resonant states.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(N(1720)P + c.c. → pPπ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>119</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>119</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.79 ± 0.10<sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.71</sub></td><td>0.5k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13A BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pPπ<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From a fit of π⁰pP data to eight distinct intermediate Np resonant states.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(N(2300)P + c.c. → pPπ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>120</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>120</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.62 ± 0.28<sup>+1.12</sup><sub>-0.64</sub></td><td>0.9k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13A BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pPπ<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From a fit of π⁰pP data to eight distinct intermediate Np resonant states.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(N(2570)P + c.c. → pPπ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>121</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>121</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.13 ± 0.08<sup>+0.40</sup><sub>-0.30</sub></td><td>0.8k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13A BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pPπ<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From a fit of π⁰pP data to eight distinct intermediate Np resonant states.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(pPπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>122</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>122</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>6.0 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>5.9 ± 0.2 ± 0.4</td><td>904.5</td><td>BRIERE</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pPπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$8 \pm 2$$

$$1 \text{ TANENBAUM} \quad 78 \quad \text{MRK1} \quad e^{+}e^{-}$$

¹Assuming entirely strong decay.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ρP<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>123</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>123</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.7 ± 0.6 ± 0.4</td><td>30.1</td><td>BRIERE</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pP<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ρPη)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>124</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>124</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>6.0 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>6.4 ± 0.2 ± 0.6</td><td>679</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13S BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → ηpP</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.6 ± 0.6 ± 0.3</td><td>154</td><td>2 ALEXANDER</td><td>10 CLEO</td><td>ψ(2S) → ηpP</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.8 ± 1.1 ± 0.7</td><td>44.8 ± 8.5</td><td>2 ABLIKIM</td><td>05E BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pPηγ</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹With N(1535) decaying to pη.

²Computed using B(η → γγ) = (39.43 ± 0.26)%.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(N(1535)P + c.c. → pPη)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>125</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>125</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead></table>

4.5 ± 0.7 / -0.6 OUR AVERAGE

$$5.2 \pm 0.3^{+3.2}_{-1.2} \quad 527 \quad 1 \text{ ABLIKIM} \quad 13S \quad \text{BES3} \quad \psi(2S) \rightarrow \eta p\bar{p}$$

$$4.4 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.3 \quad 123 \quad 2 \text{ ALEXANDER} \quad 10 \quad \text{CLEO} \quad \psi(2S) \rightarrow \eta p\bar{p}$$

¹With N(1535) decaying to pη.

²From a fit of the pP and pη distributions to a combination of N*(1535)P and a broad pP enhancement around 2100 MeV.
$$ \Gamma(\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{126}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.3±0.4±0.6</td><td>434.9</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BRIERE</td><td>05</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>π<sub>p</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{p}\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{127}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.5±0.1±0.2</td><td>61.1</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BRIERE</td><td>05</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>π<sub>p</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{p}\bar{\rho}\omega)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{128}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.69±0.21</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BRIERE</td><td>05</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>π<sub>p</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>BAI</td><td>03B BES</td></tr></tbody></table>

0.6 ± 0.2 ± 0.2 21.2

0.8 ± 0.3 ± 0.1 14.9 ± 0.1

¹ Normalized to $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-) = 0.305 \pm 0.016$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{p}\pi\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{129}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.10±0.10±0.08</td><td>491</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>19N BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → η' pπ<sub>p</sub></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From the combination of $p\bar{p}\pi\eta' \rightarrow p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-\eta$ and $p\bar{p}\pi' \rightarrow p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-\gamma$ channels.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{p}\bar{\rho}\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{130}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.06±0.38±0.48</td><td>753</td><td>ABLIKIM</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>19AO BES3</td><td></td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<24 90 BRIERE

05 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>

<26 90 <fnref n="1" /> BAI ψ(2S) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> pπ<sub>p</sub>

03B BES ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> pπ<sub>p</sub>

¹ Normalized to $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-) = 0.305 \pm 0.016$.

$$ \Gamma(\phi X(1835) \rightarrow p\bar{\rho}\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{131}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.82 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>19AO BES3</td><td></td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{p}\pi^- \text{ or c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{132}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.48±0.17</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>06I BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → pπ<sup>-</sup>X</td></tr><tr><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>06I BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → pπ<sup>+</sup>X</td></tr></tbody></table>

2.45±0.11±0.21 851

2.52±0.12±0.22 849

$$ \Gamma(\bar{p}\pi^-\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{133}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.18±0.50±0.50</td><td>135 ± 21</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>06I BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → pπ<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>X</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{134}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.81±0.13</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>17L BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ΛΛ<sub>S</sub></td></tr><tr><td>1 DOBBS</td><td>17</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ΛΛ<sub>S</sub></td></tr><tr><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>07C BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07BD BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ΛΛ<sub>S</sub>γ</td></tr><tr><td>PEDLAR</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>FELDMAN</td><td>77 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

3.97±0.02±0.12 31k

3.71±0.05±0.15 6.5k

3.39±0.20±0.32 337

6.4 ± 1.8 ± 0.1 208

3.28±0.23±0.25 80

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

3.75±0.09±0.23 1.9k

1.81±0.20±0.27 80

<4 90 FELDMAN

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
3.81±0.13 (Error scaled by 1.4)

<figure><img src="image_680.png" /></figure>

$\Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{135}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.42±0.39±0.59</td><td>23</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>22AP BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>π<sub>p</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γγ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

< 2.9

90

² ABLIKIM 13F BES3 ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>π<sub>p</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γγ

<120

90

³ ABLIKIM 07H BES2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{136}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.43±0.32</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td>2.43±0.32</td><td>218</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>22AP BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>π<sub>p</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γγ</td></tr><tr><td>2.34±0.18±0.52</td><td></td><td>218</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>22AP BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>π<sub>p</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γγ</td></tr><tr><td>2.48±0.34±0.19</td><td></td><td>60</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13F BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>π<sub>p</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γγ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<4.9

90

² ABLIKIM 07H BES2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{137}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.34±0.94±0.43</td><td>218</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>23BV BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)γ(γ)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}\omega(782))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{139}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.30±0.34±0.29</td><td>207</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>22AZ BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda(1670)\bar{\Lambda} \rightarrow \Lambda\bar{\Lambda}\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{137}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.29±0.31±0.62</td><td>116</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>22AP BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>π<sub>p</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γγ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{140}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.8±0.4±0.5</td><td>73.4</td><td>BRIERE</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\rho}K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{141}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.0±0.1±0.1</td><td>74.0</td><td>BRIERE</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\rho}K^*(892)^+ + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{142}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.3±0.5±0.5</td><td>1011</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19AU BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\rho}K^+\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{143}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.8±0.3±0.3</td><td>45.8</td><td>BRIERE</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → pπ<sub>p</sub>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda n K_S^0 + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{144}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.81±0.11±0.14</td><td>50</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>08C BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Delta^{++}\bar{\Delta}^{--})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{145}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>12.8±1.0±3.4</td><td>157</td><td>1 BAI</td><td>01 BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\Sigma^+\pi^- + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{146}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.40±0.03±0.13</td><td>2.8k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13W BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\Sigma^-\pi^+ + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{147}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.54±0.04±0.13</td><td>2.8k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13W BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote n="1">¹ Using CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² AUBERT 07BD reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow \Lambda\bar{\Lambda})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow e^+e^-)] = (15 \pm 4 \pm 1) \times 10^{-4}$ keV which we divide by our best value $\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow e^+e^-) = 2.33 \pm 0.04$ keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Superseded by DOBBS 17.</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Estimated using $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-) = 0.310 \pm 0.028$.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ With a significance of 3.7 σ. The corresponding 90% CL upper limit is $2.47 \times 10^{-6}$.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Using $B(\Lambda \rightarrow \pi^-\pi) = 63.9\%$ and $B(\pi^0 \rightarrow \gamma\gamma) = 98.8\%$.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Using $B(\Lambda \rightarrow \pi^-\pi) = 63.9\%$ and $B(\eta \rightarrow \gamma\gamma) = 39.4\%$.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ Using $B(\Lambda \rightarrow \pi^-\pi) = 63.9\%$ and $B(\eta \rightarrow \gamma\gamma) = 39.31\%$.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Using $B(\Lambda \rightarrow \pi^-\pi) = 63.9\%$.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ Using $B(\Lambda \rightarrow \pi^-\pi) = 0.639$ and $B(\omega \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) = 0.893$.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ From a partial wave analysis of the $\Lambda\eta$ system.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ Using $B(\Lambda \rightarrow \bar{\rho}\pi^+) = 63.9\%$ and $B(K_S^0 \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-) = 69.2\%$.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ Estimated using $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-) = 0.310 \pm 0.028$.</footnote>
<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ΛΣ<sup>0</sup> + c.c.)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>148</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.60±0.31±0.59</td><td>60</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>21L</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ΛΣ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>149</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.23±0.23±0.08</td><td>30</td><td>1 DOBBS</td><td>17</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></table>

¹ Using CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Σ<sup>0</sup>PK<sup>+</sup> + c.c.)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>150</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.67±0.13±0.12</td><td>276</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>13D</td><td>BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → γΛP̄K<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Using B(Λ → pπ⁻) = 63.9%, and B(Σ⁰ → Λγ) = 100%.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Σ<sup>+</sup>Σ<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>151</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.43±0.10 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.4.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.52±0.04±0.09</td><td>5.4k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>21AT</td><td>BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → pπ<sup>0</sup>P̄π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.31±0.06±0.10</td><td>1.9k</td><td>1 DOBBS</td><td>17</td><td></td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>2.57±0.44±0.68</td><td>35</td><td>PEDLAR</td><td>05</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.51±0.15±0.16</td><td>281</td><td>1,2 DOBBS</td><td>14</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></table>

¹ Using CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

² Superseded by DOBBS 17.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Σ<sup>0</sup>Σ<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>152</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.35±0.09 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.44±0.03±0.11</td><td>7k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>17L</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>2.22±0.05±0.11</td><td>2.6k</td><td>1 DOBBS</td><td>17</td><td></td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>2.35±0.36±0.32</td><td>59</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>07C</td><td>BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>2.63±0.35±0.21</td><td>58</td><td>PEDLAR</td><td>05</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.25±0.11±0.16</td><td>439</td><td>1,2 DOBBS</td><td>14</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>1.2±0.4±0.4</td><td>8</td><td>3 BAI</td><td>01</td><td>BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></table>

¹ Using CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

² Superseded by DOBBS 17.

³ Estimated using B(ψ(2S) → J/ψπ⁺π⁻) = 0.310 ± 0.028.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Σ<sup>-</sup>Σ<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>153</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.82±0.04±0.08</td><td>6.6k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>22AV</td><td>BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → nπ<sup>-</sup>P̄π<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Σ<sup>+</sup>Σ<sup>-</sup>η)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>154</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.59±2.37±0.61</td><td>21</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>22AY</td><td>BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → Σ<sup>+</sup>Σ<sup>-</sup>η</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Σ<sup>+</sup>Σ<sup>-</sup>ω)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>155</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.89±0.18±0.21</td><td>199</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>23BE</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Σ<sup>+</sup>Σ<sup>-</sup>φ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>156</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.96±0.54±0.41</td><td>55</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>23BE</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Σ(1385)+Σ<sup>-</sup>(1385)<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>157</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.5±0.7 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8.4±0.5±0.5</td><td>1.5k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>16L</td><td>BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → Σ(1385)+Σ<sup>-</sup>(1385)<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>11±3±3</td><td>14</td><td>1 BAI</td><td>01</td><td>BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Estimated using B(ψ(2S) → J/ψπ⁺π⁻) = 0.310 ± 0.028.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Σ(1385)-Σ<sup>-</sup>(1385)<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>158</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.5±0.6±0.6</td><td>1.4k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>16L</td><td>BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → Σ(1385)-Σ<sup>-</sup>(1385)<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Σ(1385)<sup>0</sup>Σ<sup>-</sup>(1385)<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>159</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.69±0.05±0.05</td><td>2.2k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>17E</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Ξ<sup>0</sup>Ξ<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>160</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL% EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

².87±0.11 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

<table><tr><td>3.03±0.05±0.14</td><td>3.6k</td><td>1 DOBBS</td><td>17</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>2.78±0.05±0.14</td><td>5k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>16L</td><td>BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → Ξ<sup>-</sup>Ξ<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3.03±0.40±0.32</td><td>67</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>07C</td><td>BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>2.38±0.30±0.21</td><td>63</td><td>PEDLAR</td><td>05</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.66±0.12±0.20</td><td>548</td><td>1,2 DOBBS</td><td>14</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>0.94±0.27±0.15</td><td>12</td><td>3 BAI</td><td>01</td><td>BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2</td><td>90</td><td>FELDMAN</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></table>

¹ Using CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

² Superseded by DOBBS 17.

³ Estimated using B(ψ(2S) → J/ψπ⁺π⁻) = 0.310 ± 0.028.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Ξ<sup>0</sup>Ξ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>161</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

².3 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 4.2.

<table><tr><td>2.73±0.03±0.13</td><td>11k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>17E</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>1.97±0.06±0.11</td><td>1.2k</td><td>1 DOBBS</td><td>17</td><td></td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>2.75±0.64±0.61</td><td>19</td><td>PEDLAR</td><td>05</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.02±0.19±0.15</td><td>112</td><td>1,2 DOBBS</td><td>14</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></table>

¹ Using CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

² Superseded by DOBBS 17.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Ξ(1530)<sup>0</sup>Ξ(1530)<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>162</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL% EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.77±0.14±0.39</td><td>2951</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>21A0</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;32</td><td>90</td><td>PEDLAR</td><td>05</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 8.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 BAI</td><td>01</td><td>BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></table>

¹ Estimated using B(ψ(2S) → J/ψπ⁺π⁻) = 0.310 ± 0.028.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(ΛΞ<sup>+</sup>Κ<sup>-</sup> + c.c.)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>163</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.86±0.27±0.32</td><td>236</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>15I</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → Κ<sup>-</sup>ΛΞ<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Ξ(1530)<sup>0</sup>Ξ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>166</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.45±0.40±0.59</td><td>5k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19AT</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Ξ(1530)<sup>0</sup>Ξ<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>167</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.0±1.1±0.4</td><td>399</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19AT</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Ξ(1530)<sup>0</sup>Ξ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>168</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.53±0.04±0.03</td><td>278</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>21A0</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Ξ(1690)<sup>0</sup>Ξ<sup>+</sup> → Κ<sup>-</sup>ΛΞ<sup>+</sup> + c.c.)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>164</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.21±1.48±0.57</td><td>74</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>15I</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → Κ<sup>-</sup>ΛΞ<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Ξ(1820)<sup>0</sup>Ξ<sup>+</sup> → Κ<sup>-</sup>ΛΞ<sup>+</sup> + c.c.)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>165</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>12.03±2.94±1.22</td><td>136</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>15I</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → Κ<sup>-</sup>ΛΞ<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Σ<sup>0</sup>Ξ<sup>+</sup>Κ<sup>-</sup> + c.c.)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>169</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.67±0.33±0.28</td><td>142</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>15I</td><td>BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → Κ<sup>-</sup>Σ<sup>0</sup>Ξ<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Γ(Ω<sup>-</sup>Ω<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="3">Γ<sub>170</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL% EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.66±0.30 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.3.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.85±0.12±0.25</td><td>4k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>21E</td><td>BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → Ω<sup>-</sup>Ω<sup>+</sup> → ΛΚ<sup>-</sup>ΛΚ<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>5.2±0.3±0.3</td><td>326</td><td>1,2 DOBBS</td><td>17</td><td></td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tr><td>4.7±0.9±0.5</td><td>27</td><td>1,2,3 DOBBS</td><td>14</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;15</td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>12Q</td><td>BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;16</td><td>90</td><td>PEDLAR</td><td>05</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 7.3</td><td>90</td><td>4 BAI</td><td>01</td><td>BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>4.7±0.9±0.5</td><td>27</td><td>1,2,3 DOBBS</td><td>14</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;15</td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>12Q</td><td>BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;16</td><td>90</td><td>PEDLAR</td><td>05</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 7.3</td><td>90</td><td>4 BAI</td><td>01</td><td>BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → hadrons</td></tr></table>

¹ Using B(Ω⁻ → ΛΚ⁻) = (67.8 ± 0.7)% and B(Λ → pπ⁻) = (63.9 ± 0.5)%.

² Using CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

³ Superseded by DOBBS 17.

⁴ Estimated using B(ψ(2S) → J/ψπ⁺π⁻) = 0.310 ± 0.028.
$$ \Gamma(\eta_c \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{171} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.0</td><td>90</td><td>PEDLAR</td><td>07</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(h_c(1P)\pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{172} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">7.4 ±0.5 OUR AVERAGE</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.32 ±0.34 ±0.41</td><td>46k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>22AQ BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → π<sup>0</sup> hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>9.0 ±1.5 ±1.3</td><td>3k</td><td>1 GE</td><td>11 CLEO</td><td>ψ(2S) → π<sup>0</sup> anything</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>8.4 ±1.3 ±1.0</td><td>11k</td><td>2 ABLIKIM</td><td>10B BES3</td><td>ψ(2S) → π<sup>0</sup> h<sub>c</sub></td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>92<sup>+23</sup><sub>-22</sub></td><td>ADAMS</td><td>09 CLEO</td><td>ψ(2S) → 2π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>2π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>1282</td><td>DOBBS</td><td>08A CLEO</td><td>ψ(2S) → π<sup>0</sup> η<sub>c</sub>γ</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>168 ± 40</td><td>ROSNER</td><td>05 CLEO</td><td>ψ(2S) → π<sup>0</sup> η<sub>c</sub>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \bar{p} e^+ e^- + \text{c.c.}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{173} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>450M</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>18Q</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Theta(1540)\bar{\Theta}(1540) \rightarrow K_S^0 p K^- \pi^+ + \text{c.c.}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{174} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.88</td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>04G</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Theta(1540)K^- \pi^- \rightarrow K_S^0 p K^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{175} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.0</td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>04G</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Theta(1540)K_S^0 \bar{p} \rightarrow K_S^0 p K^+ n) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{176} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.70</td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>04G</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Theta}(1540)K^+ n \rightarrow K_S^0 p K^+ n) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{177} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.6</td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>04G</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Theta}(1540)K_S^0 p \rightarrow K_S^0 p K^- \bar{n}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{178} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.60</td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>04G</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

## RADIATIVE DECAYS

$$ \Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c0}(1P)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{179} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

9.77 ±0.23 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">9.33 ±0.26 OUR AVERAGE</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.389 ±0.014 ±0.332</td><td>4.7M</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>17u BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr><tr><td>9.22 ±0.11 ±0.46</td><td>72k</td><td>ATHAR</td><td>04 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr><tr><td>9.9 ±0.5 ±0.8</td><td></td><td>1 GAISER</td><td>86 CBAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr><tr><td>7.2 ±2.3</td><td></td><td>1 BIDDICK</td><td>77 CNTR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr><tr><td>7.5 ±2.6</td><td></td><td>1 WHITAKER</td><td>76 MRK1 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c1}(1P)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{180} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

9.75 ±0.27 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">9.54 ±0.29 OUR AVERAGE</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.905 ±0.011 ±0.353</td><td>5.0M</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>17u BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr><tr><td>9.07 ±0.11 ±0.54</td><td>76k</td><td>ATHAR</td><td>04 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr><tr><td>9.0 ±0.5 ±0.7</td><td></td><td>1 GAISER</td><td>86 CBAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr><tr><td>7.1 ±1.9</td><td></td><td>2 BIDDICK</td><td>77 CNTR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c0}(1P)) / \Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c1}(1P)) \qquad \Gamma_{179} / \Gamma_{180} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.02 ±0.01 ±0.07</td><td>1 ATHAR</td><td>04 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c2}(1P)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{181} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

9.36 ±0.23 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

9.42 ±0.31 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">9.621 ±0.013 ±0.272</th><th>4.2M</th><th>ABLIKIM</th><th>17u BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.33 ±0.14 ±0.61</td><td>79k</td><td>ATHAR</td><td>04 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr><tr><td>8.0 ±0.5 ±0.7</td><td></td><td>1 GAISER</td><td>86 CBAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr><tr><td>7.0 ±2.0</td><td></td><td>2 BIDDICK</td><td>77 CNTR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr></tbody></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
9.42±0.31 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_681.png" /></figure>

$\Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c2}(1P))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ \frac{[\Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c0}(1P)) + \Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c1}(1P)) + \Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c2}(1P))] / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{(\Gamma_{179} + \Gamma_{180} + \Gamma_{181}) / \Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>27.6 ±0.3 ±2.0</th><th>1 ATHAR</th><th>04 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c0}(1P))}{\Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c2}(1P))} \qquad \frac{\Gamma_{179}}{\Gamma_{181}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>0.99 ±0.02 ±0.08</th><th>1 ATHAR</th><th>04 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c2}(1P))}{\Gamma(\gamma \chi_{c1}(1P))} \qquad \frac{\Gamma_{181}}{\Gamma_{180}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>1.03 ±0.02 ±0.03</th><th>1 ATHAR</th><th>04 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\gamma \eta_c(1S))}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\Gamma_{182}}{\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.36 ±0.05 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.3.

0.34 ±0.05 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.

<table><thead><tr><th>0.432 ±0.016 ±0.060</th><th>MITCHELL</th><th>09 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.32 ±0.04 ±0.06</th><th>1 ATHAR</th><th>04 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.28 ±0.06</th><th>2 GAISER</th><th>86 CBAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → γX</th></tr></thead></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.34±0.05 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_682.png" /></figure>

$\Gamma(\gamma \eta_c(1S))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\gamma \eta_c(2S))}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\Gamma_{183}}{\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>7 ±2 ±4</th><th>1 ABLIKIM</th><th>12G BES3 ψ(2S) → γK<sup>0</sup> Kπ</th></tr></thead></table>

<footnote n="1">¹Assuming a width $\Gamma(h_c(1P)) = 0.86$ MeV $\equiv \Gamma_0$, a measured dependence of the central value of $B = (7.6 \pm 1.4) \times \Gamma(h_c(1P)/\Gamma_0) \times 10^{-4}$, and with a systematic error that accounts for the width variation range 0.43–1.29 MeV.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Superseded by ABLIKIM 22AQ</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Angular distribution (1+cos²θ) assumed.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Angular distribution (1–0.189 cos²θ) assumed.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Valid for isotropic distribution of the photon.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Not independent from ATHAR 04 measurements of B(γχ<sub>c</sub><sub>7</sub>).</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Angular distribution (1–0.052 cos²θ) assumed.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Valid for isotropic distribution of the photon.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Not independent from ATHAR 04 measurements of B(γχ<sub>c</sub><sub>7</sub>).</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Not independent from ATHAR 04 measurements of B(γχ<sub>c</sub><sub>7</sub>).</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Not independent from ATHAR 04 measurements of B(γχ<sub>c</sub><sub>7</sub>).</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ATHAR 04 used $\Gamma_{\eta_c(1S)} = 24.8 \pm 4.9$ MeV to obtain this result.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²GAISER 86 used $\Gamma_{\eta_c(1S)} = 11.5 \pm 4.5$ MeV to obtain this result.</footnote>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 8</td><td>90</td><td><sup>2</sup>CRONIN-HEN..10</td><td>CLEO</td><td>ψ(2S) → γK<span style="text-decoration: overline">K</span>π</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;20</td><td>90</td><td>ATHAR</td><td>04</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr><tr><td>20-130</td><td>95</td><td>EDWARDS</td><td>82c</td><td>CBAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γX</td></tr></table>

1 ABLIKIM 126 reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow \gamma\eta_c(2S))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\eta_c(2S) \rightarrow K\bar{K}\pi)] = (1.30 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.30) \times 10^{-5}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\eta_c(2S) \rightarrow K\bar{K}\pi) = (1.9 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 CRONIN-HENNESSY 10 reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow \gamma\eta_c(2S))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\eta_c(2S) \rightarrow K\bar{K}\pi)] < 14.5 \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\eta_c(2S) \rightarrow K\bar{K}\pi) = 1.9 \times 10^{-2}$. This measurement assumes $\Gamma(\eta_c(2S)) = 14$ MeV. CRONIN-HENNESSY 10 gives the analytic dependence of limits on width.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{184}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>1.04&plusmn;0.22</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">Error includes scale factor of 1.4.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">0.95&plusmn;0.16&plusmn;0.05</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">423 ABLIKIM</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">17X BES3 ψ(2S) → γπ<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">1.58&plusmn;0.40&plusmn;0.13</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">37 ABLIKIM</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">10F BES3 ψ(2S) → γπ<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 5</td><td>90</td><td>PEDLAR</td><td>09</td><td>CLE3</td><td>ψ(2S) → γX</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5400</td><td>95</td><td>1 LIBERMAN</td><td>75</td><td>SPEC</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1 &times; 10<sup>4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>WIIK</td><td>75</td><td>DASP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></table>

1 Restated by us using $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-}) = 0.0077$.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma(2\pi^{+} \pi^{-}))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{185}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>39.6&plusmn;2.8&plusmn;5.0</td><td>583</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>07D</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\gamma(3\pi^{+} \pi^{-}))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{186}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;17</td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>07D</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\gamma\eta'(958))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{187}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>1.24 &plusmn; 0.04</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">1.251 &plusmn; 0.022 &plusmn; 0.062</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">56k ABLIKIM</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">1.26 &plusmn; 0.03 &plusmn; 0.08</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">2226 1 ABLIKIM</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">1.19 &plusmn; 0.08 &plusmn; 0.03</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">PEDLAR</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">1.24 &plusmn; 0.27 &plusmn; 0.15</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">23 ABLIKIM</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">1.54 &plusmn; 0.31 &plusmn; 0.20</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">~ 43 BAI</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">98F BES ψ(2S) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>2γ, π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>3γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 60</td><td>90</td><td>2 BRAUNSCH...</td><td>77</td><td>DASP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 11</td><td>90</td><td>3 BARTEL</td><td>76</td><td>CNTR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></table>

1 Combining the results from $\eta' \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\eta$ and $\eta' \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\gamma$ decay modes.

2 Restated by us using total decay width 228 keV.

3 The value is normalized to the branching ratio for $\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma f_2(1270))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{188}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.73 $^{+0.29}_{-0.25}$ OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.8.

<table><tr><td>2.84 &plusmn; 0.15 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>1.9k</td><td>1,2 DOBBS</td><td>15</td><td>ψ(2S) → γππ</td></tr><tr><td>2.12 &plusmn; 0.19 &plusmn; 0.32</td><td></td><td>3,4 BAI</td><td>03C BES</td><td>ψ(2S) → γππ</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.08 &plusmn; 0.19 &plusmn; 0.33</td><td>200.6 &plusmn; 18.8</td><td>3 BAI</td><td>03C BES</td><td>ψ(2S) → γπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.90 &plusmn; 1.08 &plusmn; 1.07</td><td>29.9 &plusmn; 11.1</td><td>3 BAI</td><td>03C BES</td><td>ψ(2S) → γπ<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></table>

1 Using CLEO-c data but not authorized by the CLEO Collaboration.

2 DOBBS 15 reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow \gamma f_2(1270))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(f_2(1270) \rightarrow \pi\pi)] = (2.39 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.09) \times 10^{-4}$ which we divide by our best value $B(f_2(1270) \rightarrow \pi\pi) = (84.3 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3 Normalized to $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi\pi^{+}\pi^{-}) = 0.305 \pm 0.016$.

4 Combining the results from $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ and $\pi^{0}\pi^{0}$ decay modes.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma f_6(1370) \rightarrow \gamma K\bar{K})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{189}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.1 &plusmn; 1.0 &plusmn; 1.4</td><td>175</td><td>1 DOBBS</td><td>15 ψ(2S) → γK<span style="text-decoration: overline">K</span></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Using CLEO-c data but not authorized by the CLEO Collaboration.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma f_6(1500))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{190}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.3 &plusmn; 1.8 &plusmn; 0.6</td><td>274</td><td>1,2 DOBBS</td><td>15 ψ(2S) → γππ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 DOBBS 15 reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow \gamma f_0(1500))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(f_0(1500) \rightarrow \pi\pi)] = (3.2 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-5}$ which we divide by our best value $B(f_0(1500) \rightarrow \pi\pi) = (34.5 \pm 2.2) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Using CLEO-c data but not authorized by the CLEO Collaboration.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma f_2'(1525))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{191}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.3 &plusmn; 0.8 &plusmn; 0.1</td><td>136</td><td>1,2 DOBBS</td><td>15 ψ(2S) → γK<span style="text-decoration: overline">K</span></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 DOBBS 15 reports $[\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow \gamma f_2'(1525))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(f_2'(1525) \rightarrow K\bar{K})] = (2.9 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-5}$ which we divide by our best value $B(f_2'(1525) \rightarrow K\bar{K}) = (88.8 \pm 2.2) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Using CLEO-c data but not authorized by the CLEO Collaboration.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma f_6(1710) \rightarrow \gamma\pi\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{193}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>3.5 &plusmn; 0.6</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">3.6 &plusmn; 0.4 &plusmn; 0.5</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">290 1 DOBBS</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">3.01 &plusmn; 0.41 &plusmn; 1.24</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">35.6 &plusmn; 4.8 2 BAI</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">03C BES ψ(2S) → γππ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Using CLEO-c data but not authorized by the CLEO Collaboration.

2 Normalized to $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi\pi^{+}\pi^{-}) = 0.305 \pm 0.016$.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma f_6(1710) \rightarrow \gamma K\bar{K})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{194}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>6.6 &plusmn; 0.7</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">6.7 &plusmn; 0.6 &plusmn; 0.6</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">375 1 DOBBS</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">6.04 &plusmn; 0.90 &plusmn; 1.32</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">39.6 &plusmn; 5.9 2,3 BAI</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">03C BES ψ(2S) → γK<span style="text-decoration: overline">K</span></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$< 15.6$ 90 6.8 $\pm$ 3.1 2,3 BAI 03C BES $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \gamma K_S^0 K_S^0$

1 Using CLEO-c data but not authorized by the CLEO Collaboration.

2 Includes unknown branching fractions to $K^{+}K^{-}$ or $K_S^0K_S^0$. We have multiplied the $K^{+}K^{-}$ result by a factor of 2 and the $K_S^0K_S^0$ result by a factor of 4 to obtain the $K\bar{K}$ result.

3 Normalized to $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi\pi^{+}\pi^{-}) = 0.305 \pm 0.016$.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma f_6(2100) \rightarrow \gamma\pi\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{195}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.8 &plusmn; 0.5 &plusmn; 0.9</td><td>373</td><td>1 DOBBS</td><td>15 ψ(2S) → γππ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Using CLEO-c data but not authorized by the CLEO Collaboration.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma f_6(2200) \rightarrow \gamma K\bar{K})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{196}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.2 &plusmn; 0.6 &plusmn; 0.8</td><td>207</td><td>1 DOBBS</td><td>15 ψ(2S) → γK<span style="text-decoration: overline">K</span></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Using CLEO-c data but not authorized by the CLEO Collaboration.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma f_7(2220) \rightarrow \gamma\pi\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{197}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.8 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 DOBBS</td><td>15 ψ(2S) → γππ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Using CLEO-c data but not authorized by the CLEO Collaboration.

2 For $\Gamma = 20/50$ MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ and $\pi^{0}\pi^{0}$ are $3.2/4.3 \times 10^{-6}$ and $2.6/4.0 \times 10^{-6}$, respectively.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma f_7(2220) \rightarrow \gamma K\bar{K})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{198}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;9.5 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 DOBBS</td><td>15 ψ(2S) → γK<span style="text-decoration: overline">K</span></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Using CLEO-c data but not authorized by the CLEO Collaboration.

2 For $\Gamma = 20/50$ MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for $K^{+}K^{-}$ and $K_S^0K_S^0$ are $2.1/4.3 \times 10^{-6}$ and $3.7/5.5 \times 10^{-6}$, respectively.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{199}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>0.92&plusmn;0.18</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">0.85&plusmn;0.18&plusmn;0.04</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">382 1 ABLIKIM</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">1.38&plusmn;0.48&plusmn;0.09</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">13 1 ABLIKIM</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">ψ(2S) → γπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, γ3π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">ψ(2S) → γπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, γ3π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 2</td><td>90</td><td>PEDLAR</td><td>09</td><td>CLE3</td><td>ψ(2S) → γX</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 90</td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>98r</td><td>BES</td><td>ψ(2S) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>3γ</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;200</td><td>90</td><td>YAMADA</td><td>77</td><td>DASP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 3γ</td></tr></table>

1 Combining the results from $\eta \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}$ and $\eta \rightarrow 3\pi^{0}$ decay modes.

$$ \Gamma(\gamma\eta\pi^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{200}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.71 &plusmn; 1.25 &plusmn; 1.64</td><td>418</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>06R BES2</td><td>ψ(2S) → γηη<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\gamma\eta(1405) \rightarrow \gamma K\bar{K}\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{202}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.9</td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>06R BES2</td><td>ψ(2S) → γK<sup>0</sup>S K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;1.3</td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>06R BES2</td><td>ψ(2S) → γK<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 SCHARRE</td><td>80 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></table>

1 Includes unknown branching fraction $\eta(1405) \rightarrow K\bar{K}\pi$.