$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\Lambda)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\Lambda) \qquad \Gamma_4/\Gamma_2 $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

**0.508 \pm 0.023** OUR AVERAGE

0.513 \pm 0.023 \pm 0.019

0.50 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.02

1 AAIJ 2 AAD 19F LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1 AAIJ 19F uses $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (5.961 \pm 0.033) \times 10^{-2}$ and $B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = (7.93 \pm 0.17) \times 10^{-3}$ from PDG 18 with assumption of lepton universality. AAIJ 19F reports this result as 0.513 \pm 0.023 \pm 0.016 \pm 0.011, where the last uncertainty is the contribution due to the external input of branching fractions used in the analysis.

2 AAD 15CH uses $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (5.961 \pm 0.033) \times 10^{-2}$ and $B(\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (7.89 \pm 0.17) \times 10^{-3}$ from PDG 14 with assumption of lepton universality.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\Lambda\phi)/\Gamma(\psi(2S)\Lambda) \qquad \Gamma_3/\Gamma_4 $$

**VALUE** (units $10^{-2}$) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

8.26 \pm 0.90 \pm 0.69

SIRUNYAN 20H CMS pp at 13 TeV

$$ \Gamma(pD^+\pi^-\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_5/\Gamma $$

**VALUE** EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

seen 52 BARI 91 SFM $D^0 \to K^-\pi^+$

seen 81 BASILE 81 SFM $D^0 \to K^-\pi^+$

$$ \Gamma(pD^+\pi^-\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^+\pi^-\pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_6/\Gamma_7 $$

**VALUE (%)** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

3.56 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.17

1 AAIJ 22R LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

1 AAIJ 22R reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to pD^+\pi^-\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^+\pi^-\pi^-)] \times [B(D^+ \to K^-2\pi^+) / [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]] = 5.35 \pm 0.21 \pm 0.16 \%$ which we multiply by divide by our best values $B(D^+ \to K^-2\pi^+) = (9.38 \pm 0.16) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(pD^*(2010)^+\pi^-\pi^-)/\Gamma(pD^+\pi^-\pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_7/\Gamma_8 $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1.90 \pm 0.19

1 AAIJ 22R LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

1 AAIJ 22R uses partial reconstruction of $pD^+\pi^-\pi^-$ final state.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c(2860)^+\pi^-, \Lambda_c^+ \to D^0\pi)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c(2880)^+\pi^-, \Lambda_c^+ \to D^0\pi) \qquad \Gamma_8/\Gamma_9 $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

4.54 $^{+0.51}_{-0.39}$ $^{+0.21}_{-0.59}$

AAIJ 17S LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c(2940)^+\pi^-, \Lambda_c^+ \to D^0\pi)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c(2880)^+\pi^-, \Lambda_c^+ \to D^0\pi) \qquad \Gamma_{10}/\Gamma_{11} $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.83 $^{+0.31}_{-0.10}$ $^{+0.18}_{-0.43}$

AAIJ 17S LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

$$ \Gamma(pD^0K^-)/\Gamma(pD^0\pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{11}/\Gamma_{12} $$

**VALUE** (units $10^{-2}$) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

7.3 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.5

AAIJ 14H LHCB pp at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(pDK^-, D \to K^-\pi^+)/\Gamma(pDK^-, D \to K^+\pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{12}/\Gamma_{13} $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

7.1 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.4

1 AAIJ 21AD LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

1 Measured in the full phase space.

$$ \Gamma(pJ/\psi\pi^-)/\Gamma(pJ/\psi K^-) \qquad \Gamma_{14}/\Gamma_{15} $$

**VALUE** (units $10^{-2}$) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

8.24 \pm 0.25 \pm 0.42

AAIJ 14K LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

$$ \Gamma(pJ/\psi K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{16}/\Gamma $$

**VALUE** (units $10^{-4}$) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

3.17 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.57

1 AAIJ 16A LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1 AAIJ 16A reported the measurement of $(3.17 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.34^{+0.45}_{-0.28}) \times 10^{-4}$ where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, the third is due to the branching fraction of $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*(892)^0$, and the fourth is due to the knowledge of $f_{\Lambda_b}/f_d$. We combined in quadrature second to fourth uncertainties to a total systematic uncertainty.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\eta_c(1S)K^-)/\Gamma(pJ/\psi K^-) \qquad \Gamma_{17}/\Gamma_{18} $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.333 \pm 0.050 \pm 0.037

1 AAIJ 20AK LHCB pp at 13 TeV

1 AAIJ 20AK reported the measurement of 0.333 \pm 0.050 \pm 0.019 \pm 0.032, where the last uncertainty is due uncertainties of the used branching fractions of $J/\psi \to p\bar{p}$ and $\eta_c \to p\bar{p}$ decays. We combined in quadrature the systematic uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(P_c\bar{c}(4312)^+K^-, P_{c\bar{c}}^+ \to p\eta_c(1S))/\Gamma(p\eta_c(1S)K^-) \qquad \Gamma_{18}/\Gamma_{19} $$

**VALUE** CL% DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

<0.24 95

AAIJ 20AK LHCB pp at 13 TeV

$$ \Gamma(P_c\bar{c}(4380)^+K^-, P_{c\bar{c}}^+ \to pJ/\psi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{19}/\Gamma_{20} $$

$P_c^+$ is a pentaquark-charmonium state.

**VALUE** (units $10^{-5}$) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

2.66 \pm 0.22 \pm 1.41

1 AAIJ 16A LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1 AAIJ 16 total systematic includes the uncertainties on $f(P_c^+)$ and $B(\Lambda_b \to pJ/\psi K^-)$.

$$ \Gamma(P_c(4450)^+K^-, P_c \to pJ/\psi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{20}/\Gamma $$

$P_c^+$ is a pentaquark-charmonium state.

**VALUE** (units $10^{-5}$) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1.30 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.42

1 AAIJ 16A LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1 AAIJ 16 total systematic includes the uncertainties on $f(P_c^+)$ and $B(\Lambda_b \to pJ/\psi K^-)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_c(1P)pK^-)/\Gamma(pJ/\psi K^-) \qquad \Gamma_{21}/\Gamma_{22} $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.239 \pm 0.019 \pm 0.009

1 AAIJ 17AM LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1 AAIJ 17AM reports $0.242 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.016$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \chi_c(1P)pK^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to pJ/\psi K^-)] \times [B(\chi_c(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S))]$ assuming $B(\chi_c(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (33.9 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\chi_c(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (34.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_c(1P)p\pi^-)/\Gamma(\chi_c(1P)pK^-) \qquad \Gamma_{22}/\Gamma_{23} $$

**VALUE** (units $10^{-2}$) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

6.59 \pm 1.01 \pm 0.22

AAIJ 21R LHCB pp at 13 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\chi_c(2P)pK^-)/\Gamma(pJ/\psi K^-) \qquad \Gamma_{23}/\Gamma_{24} $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.244 \pm 0.024 \pm 0.009

1 AAIJ 17AM LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1 AAIJ 17AM reports $0.248 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.017$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \chi_c(2P)pK^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to pJ/\psi K^-)] \times [B(\chi_c(2P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S))]$ assuming $B(\chi_c(2P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (19.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\chi_c(2P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (19.5 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_c(2P)pK^-)/\Gamma(\chi_c(1P)pK^-) \qquad \Gamma_{23}/\Gamma_{24} $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1.06 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.04

1 AAIJ 21R LHCB pp at 13 TeV

1 The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third is related to the uncertainties in the branching fractions of the $\chi_{cJ} \to J/\psi\gamma$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_c(2P)p\pi^-)/\Gamma(\chi_c(1P)p\pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{24}/\Gamma_{25} $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.95 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.04

1 AAIJ 21R LHCB pp at 13 TeV

1 Evidence for the $\Lambda_b^0 \to \chi_c2p\pi^-$ decay is obtained with a significance of 3.5 standard deviations. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third is related to the uncertainties in the branching fractions of the $\chi_{cJ} \to J/\psi\gamma$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(pJ/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-K^-)/\Gamma(pJ/\psi K^-) \qquad \Gamma_{25}/\Gamma_{26} $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.2086 \pm 0.0096 \pm 0.0134

1 AAIJ 16Y LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1 Excludes $\psi(2S) \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho(\psi(2S)K^-)/\Gamma(pJ/\psi K^-)) \qquad \Gamma_{26}/\Gamma_{27} $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.2070 \pm 0.0076 \pm 0.0059

1 AAIJ 16Y LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1 AAIJ 16Y reports a measurement of 0.2070 \pm 0.0076 \pm 0.0046 \pm 0.0037 where the third uncertainty is due to the knowledge of $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ branching fractions. We have combined both systematic uncertainties in quadrature.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_c(3872)\Lambda(1520))/\Gamma(\chi_c(3872)pK^-) \qquad \Gamma_{28}/\Gamma_{29} $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.58 \pm 0.15

AAIJ 19AN LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\chi_c(3872)pK^-)/\Gamma(p\psi(2S)K^-) \qquad \Gamma_{27}/\Gamma_{28} $$

**VALUE** DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.53 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.14

1 AAIJ 19AN LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

1 AAIJ 19AN reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \chi_c(3872)pK^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to p\psi(2S)K^-)] \times [B(\chi_c(3872) \to \pi^+\pi^-J/\psi(1S))] / [B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-)] = (5.4 \pm 1.1 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\chi_c(3872) \to \pi^+\pi^-J/\psi(1S)) = (3.5 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = (34.69 \pm 0.34) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)p\pi^-)/\Gamma(p\psi(2S)K^-) \qquad \Gamma_{29}/\Gamma_{30} $$

**VALUE** (units $\%$) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

11.4 \pm 1.3 \pm 0.2

AAIJ 18AF LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV
# Baryon Particle Listings

$\Lambda_b^0$

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{K}^0\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units $10^{-5}$)

$$ 1.26 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.36 $$

DOCUMENT ID
1 AAIJ

TECN COMMENT

14Q LHCB pp at 7 TeV

¹ Used the normalizing mode branching fraction value of $B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.96 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-5}$.

$$ \Gamma(pK^0K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE CL%

$$ <3.5 \times 10^{-6} $$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ

TECN COMMENT

14Q LHCB pp at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units $10^{-3}$) EVTS

4.9 ±0.4 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

4.8 ±0.5 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.5.

4.60 $^{+0.31}_{-0.30}$ ±0.14

1 AAIJ 14I LHCB pp at 7 TeV

5.97 $^{+0.28}_{-0.81}$ ±0.81

2 AAIJ 14Q LHCB pp at 7 TeV

8.8 $^{+2.8}_{-1.5}$ ±1.5

3 ABULENCIA 07B CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

seen 3 ABREU 96N DLPH $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$

96N DLPH $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$

seen 4 BUSKULIC 96L ALEP $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$

96L ALEP $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$

$p\bar{K}^0, \Lambda_{\pi^+\pi^-}$

¹ AAIJ 14I reports $(4.30 \pm 0.03)^{+0.12}_{-0.11} \pm 0.26 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(B^0 \to D^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(B^0 \to D^-\pi^+) = (2.68 \pm 0.13) \times 10^{-3}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(B^0 \to D^-\pi^+) = (2.51 \pm 0.08) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Uses information on $f_{baryon}/f_d$ from measurement in semileptonic decays by the same authors.

² Obtained using the branching fraction of $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$ decay.

³ The result is obtained from $(f_{baryon}/f_d)$ ($B(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-)/B(\bar{B}^0 \to D^+\pi^-) = 0.82 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.22$, assuming $f_{baryon}/f_d = 0.25 \pm 0.04$ and $B(\bar{B}^0 \to D^+\pi^-) = (2.68 \pm 0.13) \times 10^{-3}$.

$$ \Gamma(pD^0\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^-) $$

VALUE

$$ 0.127 \pm 0.007 \pm 0.006 $$

DOCUMENT ID
1 AAIJ

TECN COMMENT

14H LHCB pp at 7 TeV

¹ AAIJ 14H reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to pD^0\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-)] \times [B(B^0 \to K^-\pi^+)]/[\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)] = (8.06 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.35) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = (3.947 \pm 0.030) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units $10^{-4}$)

3.56 ±0.28 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

$$ 3.55 \pm 0.44 \pm 0.50 $$

1 AAIJ 14Q LHCB pp at 7 TeV

¹ Obtained using the branching fraction of $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$ decay.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+K^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^-) $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ 7.31 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.08 $$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ

TECN COMMENT

14H LHCB pp at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+a_1(1260^0))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE EVTS

1 ABREU 96N DLPH

DOCUMENT ID
ABREU

TECN COMMENT

96N DLPH $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$, $a_1^- \to \rho^0\pi^- \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^-$

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+D_s^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ 1.1 \pm 0.1 $$

DOCUMENT ID
1 AAIJ

TECN COMMENT

14AA LHCB pp at 7 TeV

¹ Uses $B(\bar{B}^0 \to D^+D_s^-) = (7.2 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-3}$ and their measured $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-)/B(\bar{B}^0 \to D^+\pi^-)$ values.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+D^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+D_s^-) $$

VALUE

$$ 0.042 \pm 0.003 \pm 0.003 $$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ

TECN COMMENT

14AA LHCB pp at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units $10^{-3}$) EVTS

7.6 ±1.1 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

$$ 14.8^{+3.8}_{-3.1} \pm 1.1 $$

1 AALTONEN 12A CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

seen 90 BARI 91 SFM $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$

90 BARI 91 SFM $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$

¹ AALTONEN 12A reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}]/[B(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-)] = 3.04 \pm 0.33^{+0.70}_{-0.55}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-) = (4.96 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^-) $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$) OUR FIT

$$ 1.57 \pm 0.21 \pm 0.13 $$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ 11E LHCB

TECN COMMENT

11E LHCB pp at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c(2595)^+\pi^-, \Lambda_c(2595)^+ \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^+\pi^-) $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ 4.4 \pm 1.7^{+0.6}_{-0.4} $$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ 11E LHCB

TECN COMMENT

11E LHCB pp at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c(2625)^+\pi^-, \Lambda_c(2625)^+ \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^+\pi^-) $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ 4.3 \pm 1.5 \pm 0.4 $$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ 11E LHCB

TECN COMMENT

11E LHCB pp at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma_c(2455)^0\pi^+\pi^-, \Sigma_c^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^+\pi^-) $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ 7.4 \pm 2.4 \pm 1.2 $$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ 11E LHCB

TECN COMMENT

11E LHCB pp at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma_c(2455)^++\pi^+\pi^-, \Sigma_c^{++} \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^+)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^+\pi^-) $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ 4.2 \pm 1.8 \pm 0.7 $$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ 11E LHCB

TECN COMMENT

11E LHCB pp at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+D_s^-) $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ 9.26 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.53 $$

DOCUMENT ID
1 AAIJ 21B LHCB

TECN COMMENT

21B LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

¹ AAIJ 21B systematic uncertainty includes the contribution from the $D_s^- \to K^+K^-\pi^-$ branching fraction.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+p\bar{p}\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\pi^-) $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ 5.40 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.32 $$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ 18AW LHCB

TECN COMMENT

18AW LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma_c(2455)^0p\bar{p}, \Sigma_c^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+p\bar{p}\pi^-) $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ 8.9 \pm 1.5 \pm 0.6 $$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ 18AW LHCB

TECN COMMENT

18AW LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma_c(2520)^0p\bar{p}, \Sigma_c(2520)^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+p\bar{p}\pi^-) $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

$$ 0.119 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.014 $$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ 18AW LHCB

TECN COMMENT

18AW LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^0\pi^+2\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE EVTS

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ 18AW LHCB

TECN COMMENT

18AW LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

seen

¹ See the footnote to the ARENTON 86 mass value.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\ell^-\nu_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

The values and averages in this section serve only to show what values result if one assumes our $B(b \to b\text{-baryon})$. They cannot be thought of as measurements since the underlying product branching fractions were also used to determine $B(b \to b\text{-baryon})$ as described in the note on "Production and Decay of b-Flavored Hadrons."

VALUE EVTS

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ 18AW LHCB

TECN COMMENT

$$ 0.109 \pm 0.022 \pm 0.08 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} $$

1 BARATE 98D ALEP $e^+e^- \to Z$

$$ 0.14^{+0.05}_{-0.04} \pm 0.02 $$

2 ABREU 95S DLPH $e^+e^- \to Z$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.090 \pm 0.022 \pm 0.012 $$

3 BUSKULIC 95L ALEP Repl. by BARATE 98D

$$ 0.18 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.02 $$

4 BUSKULIC 92E ALEP $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$

¹ BARATE 98D reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\ell^-\nu_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{B} \to b\text{-baryon})] = 0.0086 \pm 0.0007 \pm 0.0014$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{B} \to b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² ABREU 95S reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\ell^-\nu_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{B} \to b\text{-baryon})] = 0.0118 \pm 0.0026^{+0.0031}_{-0.0021}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{B} \to b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ BUSKULIC 95L reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\ell^-\nu_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{B} \to b\text{-baryon})] = 0.00755 \pm 0.0014 \pm 0.0012$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{B} \to b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ BUSKULIC 92E reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\ell^-\nu_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{B} \to b\text{-baryon})] = 0.015 \pm 0.0035 \pm 0.0045$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{B} \to b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Superseded by BUSKULIC 95L.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\ell^-\nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ 18AW LHCB

TECN COMMENT

18AW LHCB pp at 7 TeV

0.062 $^{+0.014}_{-0.013}$ OUR FIT

$$ 0.050 \pm 0.011 \pm 0.016 $$

1 ABDALLAH 04A DLPH $e^+e^- \to Z^0$

¹ Derived from a combined likelihood and event rate fit to the distribution of the Isgur-Wise variable and using HQET. The slope of the form factor is measured to be $\rho^2 = 2.03 \pm 0.46^{+0.72}_{-1.00}$.
$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell) / \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{48}/\Gamma_{32} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

12.8$^{+3.0}_{-2.7}$ OUR FIT

16.6$^{\pm}3.0$ $^{\pm}_{-3.6}$ AALTONEN 09E CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \tau^- \nu_\tau) / \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{49}/\Gamma_{37} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.46$^{\pm}0.27$ $^{\pm}_{-0.40}$ 1 AAIJ 22k LHCB $p p$ at 7, 8 TeV

$^1$Uses $\tau^- \to \pi^- \pi^+ \pi^- (\pi^0) \nu_\tau$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \pi^+ \pi^- \ell^- \nu_\ell) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{50}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.056$^{+0.031}_{-0.030}$ 1 ABDALLAH 04A DLPH $e^+ e^- \to Z^0$

$^1$Derived from the fraction of $\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell) / (\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell) + \Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell)) = 0.47^{+0.10}_{-0.08} \times 0.07$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell) / \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell) + \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \pi^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell) \qquad \Gamma_{48}/(\Gamma_{48}+\Gamma_{50}) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.47$^{+0.10}_{-0.08}$ $^{+}_{-0.06}$ ABDALLAH 04A DLPH $e^+ e^- \to Z^0$

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c(2595) + \ell^- \nu_\ell) / \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell) \qquad \Gamma_{51}/\Gamma_{48} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.126$^{+0.033}_{-0.038}$ 1 AALTONEN 09E CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$^1$AALTONEN 09E assumes isospin conservation for $\Lambda_c(2595) \to \Lambda_c \pi^+ \pi^+$ and $\Lambda_c(2595) \to \Lambda_c \pi^0 \pi^0$. Significant isospin violation from thresholds in $\Lambda_c(2595) \to \Sigma_c(2455) \pi \to \Lambda_c \pi \pi$ may alter the recovered ratio.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c(2625) + \ell^- \nu_\ell) / \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell) \qquad \Gamma_{52}/\Gamma_{48} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.210$^{+0.042}_{-0.050}$ AALTONEN 09E CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$$ \left[ \frac{1}{2} \Gamma(\Sigma_c(2455)^0 \pi^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell) + \frac{1}{2} \Gamma(\Sigma_c(2455)^++ \pi^- \ell^- \nu_\ell) \right] / \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell) \qquad \left( \frac{1}{2} \Gamma_{53} + \frac{1}{2} \Gamma_{54} \right) / \Gamma_{48} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.054$^{+0.022}_{-0.018}$ AALTONEN 09E CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\rho h^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{55}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<2.3 $\times 10^{-5}$ 90 1 ACOSTA 050 CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$^1$Assumes $f_\Lambda / f_d = 0.25$, and equal momentum distribution for $\Lambda_b$ and B mesons.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{56}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units $10^{-6}$)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

4.6$^{\pm}0.8$ OUR FIT

4.1$^{\pm}0.9$ $^{\pm}_{-0.5}$ 1 AALTONEN 09C CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$\bullet \bullet$ We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. $\bullet \bullet$

<50 90 2 BUSKULIC 96V ALEP $e^+ e^- \to Z$

$^1$AALTONEN 09C reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \rho\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-)] \times [B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon}) / [B(\bar{b} \to B^0)] = 0.042 \pm 0.007 \pm 0.006$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (2.00 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-5}$, $B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\bar{b} \to B^0) = (40.8 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$^2$BUSKULIC 96V assumes PDG 96 production fractions for $B^0$, $B^+$, $B_s$, b baryons.

$$ \Gamma(\rho K^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{57}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units $10^{-6}$)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

5.5$^{\pm}1.0$ OUR FIT

6.4$^{\pm}1.2$ $^{\pm}_{-0.9}$ 1 AALTONEN 09C CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$\bullet \bullet$ We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. $\bullet \bullet$

<360 90 2 ADAM 96D DLPH $e^+ e^- \to Z$

< 50 90 3 BUSKULIC 96V ALEP $e^+ e^- \to Z$

$^1$AALTONEN 09C reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \rho K^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-)] \times [B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon}) / [B(\bar{b} \to B^0)] = 0.066 \pm 0.009 \pm 0.008$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (2.00 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-5}$, $B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\bar{b} \to B^0) = (40.8 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$^2$ADAM 96D assumes $f_\Lambda = f_\pi = 0.39$ and $f_B = 0.12$.

$^3$BUSKULIC 96V assumes PDG 96 production fractions for $B^0$, $B^+$, $B_s$, b baryons.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\pi^-) / \Gamma(\rho K^-) \qquad \Gamma_{56}/\Gamma_{57} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.84$^{\pm}0.09$ OUR FIT

0.86$^{\pm}0.08$ $^{\pm}_{-0.05}$ AAIJ 12AR LHCB $p p$ at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\rho D_s^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{58}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$\bullet \bullet$ We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. $\bullet \bullet$

<4.8 $\times 10^{-4}$ 90 AAIJ 14Q LHCB $p p$ at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\rho D_s^-) / \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{58}/\Gamma_{32} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units $10^{-3}$)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.56$^{\pm}0.10$ $^{\pm}_{-0.15}$ 1 AAIJ 23k LHCB $p p$ at 13 TeV

$^1$AAIJ 23k reports this measurement as $(2.56 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.14) \times 10^{-3}$ where the last uncertainty is due to the branching fractions $B(D_s^- \to K^- K^+ \pi^-)$ and $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to p K^- \pi^+)$ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\mu^- \nu_\mu) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{59}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units $10^{-4}$)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

4.1$^{\pm}1.0$ 1 AAIJ 15BG LHCB $p p$ at 8 TeV

$^1$The ratio of $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to \rho\mu^- \nu_\mu)$ to $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \mu^- \nu_\mu)$ is measured within a restricted $q^2$ region. Combined with theoretical calculations of the form factors and the previously measured value of $|V_{ub}|$, the first $|V_{ub}| = (3.27 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-3}$ measurement from the $\Lambda_b$ decay is obtained, consistent with the exclusively measured world averages.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\mu^- \nu_\mu) / \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \ell^- \nu_\ell) \qquad \Gamma_{59}/\Gamma_{48} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$\bullet \bullet$ We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. $\bullet \bullet$

1.0$^{\pm}0.04$ $^{\pm}_{-0.08}$ 1 AAIJ 15BG LHCB $p p$ at 8 TeV

$^1$This measurement is a ratio of $\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \rho\mu^- \nu_\mu)[q^2 > 15 \text{ GeV/c}^2]$ to $\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \mu^- \nu_\mu)[q^2 > 7 \text{ GeV/c}^2]$ within a restricted $q^2$ region. Combined with theoretical calculations of the form factors and the previously measured value of $|V_{ub}|$, the first $|V_{ub}| = (3.27 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-3}$ measurement from the $\Lambda_b$ decay is obtained, consistent with the exclusively measured world averages.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{60}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units $10^{-7}$)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

10.8$^{\pm}2.8$ OUR AVERAGE

9.6$^{\pm}1.6$ $^{\pm}_{-2.5}$ 1 AAIJ 13AJ LHCB $p p$ at 7 TeV

17.3$^{\pm}4.2$ $^{\pm}_{-5.5}$ 11AI CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$^1$Uses $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi A) = (6.2 \pm 1.4) \times 10^{-4}$. This measurement comes from the sum of the differential rates in $q^2$ regions excluding those corresponding to $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ ([0.86,10.09] and [12.86, 14.18] GeV$^2$/c$^4$).

$$ \Gamma(\rho\pi^- \mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{61}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units $10^{-8}$)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

6.9$^{+1.9}_{-1.5}$ 1 AAIJ 17P LHCB $p p$ at 7, 8 TeV

$^1$Excludes $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ decays to $\mu^+ \mu^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\pi^- \mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma(\rho\pi^- J/\psi, J/\psi \to \mu^+ \mu^-) \qquad \Gamma_{61}/\Gamma_{15} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

4.4$^{\pm}1.2$ $^{\pm}_{-0.7}$ 1 AAIJ 17P LHCB $p p$ at 7, 8 TeV

$^1$The $\rho\pi^- \mu^+ \mu^-$ mode excludes $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ decays to $\mu^+ \mu^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho K^- e^+ e^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{62}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units $10^{-6}$)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.310$^{+0.040}_{-0.047}$ 1,2 AAIJ 20M LHCB $p p$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$^1$Measured over $0.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV/c}^2$, and $m_{pK} < 2.6 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.

$^2$The first uncertainty is the statistical uncertainty and the second is the combination of all systematic uncertainties including those related to the normalization of $\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi p K^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho K^- \mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{63}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units $10^{-6}$)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.265$^{+0.014}_{-0.039}$ 1,2 AAIJ 20M LHCB $p p$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$^1$Measured over $0.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV/c}^2$, and $m_{pK} < 2.6 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.

$^2$The first uncertainty is the statistical uncertainty and the second is the combination of all systematic uncertainties including those related to the normalization of $\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi p K^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho K^- \mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma(\rho K^- e^+ e^-) \qquad \Gamma_{63}/\Gamma_{62} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.86$^{+0.14}_{-0.11}$ $^{\pm}_{-0.05}$ 1 AAIJ 20M LHCB $p p$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$^1$Measured over $0.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV/c}^2$, and $m_{pK} < 2.6 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho K^- e^+ e^-) / \Gamma(\rho J/\psi K^-) \qquad \Gamma_{62}/\Gamma_{16} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units $10^{-4}$)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

9.8$^{+1.4}_{-1.3}$ $^{\pm}_{-0.8}$ 1 AAIJ 20M LHCB $p p$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$^1$Measured over $0.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV/c}^2$, and $m_{pK} < 2.6 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.
$$ \Gamma(\rho K^{-} \mu^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma(\rho J/\psi K^{-}) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.4&plusmn;0.4&plusmn;0.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20M</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured over 0.1 < q² < 6.0 GeV/c², and mρK < 2.6 GeV/c².

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.1&plusmn;1.5&plusmn;0.9</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19Z</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;1300</td><td>90</td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>02G</td><td>CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.8 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹AAIJ 19Z normalized to $B^0 \to \eta'\kappa^0$ and used an integrated luminosity of 1.7 fb⁻¹.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9+7/5±1</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AH</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 15AH reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to \eta'\kappa^0)] = 0.142^{+0.11}_{-0.08}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to \eta'\kappa^0) = (6.6 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. The single uncertainty quoted with the original measurement combines in quadrature statistical and systematic uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\eta'(958))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AH</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 15AH reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda\eta'(958))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to \eta'\kappa^0)] < 0.047$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to \eta'\kappa^0) = 6.6 \times 10^{-5}$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\pi^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_{c}^{+} \pi^{-}) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.4±3.8±0.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16W</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 16W reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda\pi^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^{+} \pi^{-})] / [B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \Lambda\pi^{+})] = (7.3 \pm 1.9 \pm 2.2) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \Lambda\pi^{+}) = (1.29 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda K^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_{c}^{+} \pi^{-}) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.5±2.3±0.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16W</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 16W reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda K^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^{+} \pi^{-})] / [B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \Lambda\pi^{+})] = (8.9 \pm 1.2 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \Lambda\pi^{+}) = (1.29 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda K^{+} \kappa^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_{c}^{+} \kappa^{-}) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.27±0.35±0.13</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16W</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 16W reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda K^{+} \kappa^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^{+} \kappa^{-})] / [B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \Lambda\pi^{+})] = (25.3 \pm 1.9 \pm 1.9) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \Lambda\pi^{+}) = (1.29 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.8±2.1+1.6-1.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 16J reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to \kappa^0\phi)] \times [B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon})] / [B(\bar{b} \to B^0)] = 0.275 \pm 0.055 \pm 0.020$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B^0 \to \kappa^0\phi) = (7.3 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-6}$, $B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\bar{b} \to B^0) = (40.8 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\pi^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_{c}^{+} \pi^{-}) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.27±0.24+0.18-0.19</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 18Q reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \rho\pi^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^{+} \pi^{-})] / [B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \rho K^{-} \pi^{+})] = (6.85 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.32) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \rho K^{-} \pi^{+}) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\rho K^{-} \kappa^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_{c}^{+} \pi^{-}) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.82±0.10±0.04</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 18Q reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \rho K^{-} \kappa^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^{+} \pi^{-})] / [B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \rho K^{-} \pi^{+})] = (1.32 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \rho K^{-} \pi^{+}) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\rho K^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_{c}^{+} \pi^{-}) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.2±0.5+0.4-0.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 18Q reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \rho K^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^{+} \pi^{-})] / [B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \rho K^{-} \pi^{+})] = (16.4 \pm 0.3 \pm 0.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \rho K^{-} \pi^{+}) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\rho K^{-} \kappa^{+} \kappa^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_{c}^{+} \pi^{-}) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.56±0.15+0.11-0.12</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 18Q reports $[\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \rho K^{-} \kappa^{+} \kappa^{-})/\Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^{+} \pi^{-})] / [B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \rho K^{-} \pi^{+})] = (4.11 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.19) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_c^{+} \to \rho K^{-} \pi^{+}) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.71±0.27</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.72+0.24-0.22</td><td>±0.14</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AE LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.15±2.01±0.05</td><td>±0.05</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.56±0.76±0.80</td><td>±0.80</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>13AJ LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AE</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 15AE measurement covers $0.1 < q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

²Uses $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi\Lambda) = (6.2 \pm 1.4) \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (2.0 < q^2 < 4.3 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.28+0.28-0.21</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.253+0.276-0.207</td><td>±0.046</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AE LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.8 ± 1.7 ± 0.6</td><td>±0.6</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.71 ± 0.60 ± 0.23</td><td>±0.23</td><td>13AJ LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AE</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 15AE measurement covers $2.0 < q^2 < 4.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

²Uses $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi\Lambda) = (6.2 \pm 1.4) \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (q^2 < 4.3 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.7±2.5±0.9</td><td></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (4.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.04+0.18-0.00</td><td>±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AE LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (1.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.47+0.31-0.27</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 15AE measurement covers $1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (6.0 < q^2 < 8.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.50+0.24-0.22</td><td>±0.10</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AE LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (4.3 < q^2 < 8.68 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.5 ± 0.7</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (10.09 < q^2 < 12.86 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.2 ± 0.6</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 15AE measurement covers $11.0 < q^2 < 12.5 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

²Uses $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi\Lambda) = (6.2 \pm 1.4) \times 10^{-4}$.
B(Λ_b → Λμ⁺μ⁻) (14.18 < q² < 16.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.7 ±0.5 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

<table><tr><td>2.04 ±0.35</td><td>0.33</td><td>±0.42</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AE LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.0 ±0.7</td><td>±0.3</td><td></td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.44 ±0.44</td><td>±0.42</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>13AJ LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 15AE</td></tr></table>

1 AAIJ 15AE measurement covers 15.0 < q² < 16.0 GeV²/c⁴.

2 Uses B(Λ_b⁰ → J/ψΛ) = (6.2 ± 1.4) × 10⁻⁴.

B(Λ_b → Λμ⁺μ⁻) (16.0 < q² < 20.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>7.0 ±1.9</td><td>±2.2</td><td></td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>4.73 ±0.77</td><td>±1.25</td><td>1.2 AAIJ</td><td>13AJ LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 15AE</td></tr></table>

1 Uses B(Λ_b⁰ → J/ψΛ) = (6.2 ± 1.4) × 10⁻⁴.

2 Requires 16.00 < q² < 20.30 GeV²/c⁴.

B(Λ_b → Λμ⁺μ⁻) (18.0 < q² < 20.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>2.44 ±0.28</td><td>±0.50</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AE LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

B(Λ_b → Λμ⁺μ⁻) (15.0 < q² < 20.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>6.00 ±0.45</td><td>±1.25</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AE LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

B(Λ_b → Λ(1520)⁰ μ⁺μ⁻) (1.1 < q² < 6.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁸)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>9.56 ±1.13</td><td>±0.78</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23BB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses B(Λ_b → J/ψpK⁻) = (3.2 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁴. The last uncertainty is due to uncertainties of B(Λ_b⁰ → pK⁻J/ψ) and B(J/ψ → μ⁺μ⁻) values.

B(Λ_b → Λ(1520)⁰ μ⁺μ⁻) (15.0 < q² < 17.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁸)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>1.14 ±0.48</td><td>±0.26</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23BB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses B(Λ_b → J/ψpK⁻) = (3.2 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁴. The last uncertainty is due to uncertainties of B(Λ_b⁰ → pK⁻J/ψ) and B(J/ψ → μ⁺μ⁻) values.

CP VIOLATION

$A_{CP}$ is defined as

$$A_{CP} = \frac{B(\Lambda_b^0 \to f) - B(\bar{\Lambda}_b^0 \to \bar{f})}{B(\Lambda_b^0 \to f) + B(\bar{\Lambda}_b^0 \to \bar{f})}$$

the CP-violation asymmetry of exclusive Λ_b⁰ and Λ_b⁰ decay.

$A_{CP}(\Lambda_b \to p\pi^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

-0.025 ±0.029 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

<table><tr><td>-0.035 ±0.017</td><td>±0.020</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AX LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.06 ±0.07</td><td>±0.03</td><td></td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>14P CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.03 ±0.17</td><td>±0.05</td><td></td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>11N CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 14P</td></tr></table>

$A_{CP}(\Lambda_b \to pK^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

-0.025 ±0.022 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>-0.020 ±0.013</td><td>±0.019</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AX LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.10 ±0.08</td><td>±0.04</td><td></td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>14P CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.37 ±0.17</td><td>±0.03</td><td></td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>11N CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 14P</td></tr></table>

$A_{CP}(\Lambda_b \to DpK^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.12 ±0.09</td><td>±0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 ACP is measured from (B(Λ_b⁰ → [K⁺π⁻]_DpK⁻) - B(Λ_b⁰ → [K⁻π⁺]_DpK⁺))/ (B(Λ_b⁰ → [K⁺π⁻]_DpK⁻) + B(Λ_b⁰ → [K⁻π⁺]_DpK⁺)) in the full phase space.

$\Delta A_{CP}(pK^-/\pi^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.014 ±0.022</td><td>±0.010</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AX LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

$A_{CP}(\Lambda_b \to p\bar{K}^0\pi^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.22 ±0.13</td><td>±0.03</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></table>

$\Delta A_{CP}(J/\psi p\pi^-/K^-)$

$$\Delta A_{CP} \equiv A_{CP}(J/\psi p\pi^-) - A_{CP}(J/\psi pK^-)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>5.7 ±2.4</td><td>±1.2</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14K LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

$A_{CP}(\Lambda_b \to \Lambda K^+\pi^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.53 ±0.23</td><td>±0.11</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16W LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Measured relative to Λ_b⁰ → Λ_c⁺π⁻ decay.

$A_{CP}(\Lambda_b \to \Lambda K^+K^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.28 ±0.10</td><td>±0.07</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16W LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Measured relative to Λ_b⁰ → Λ_c⁺π⁻ decay.

$\Delta A_{CP}(\Lambda_b^0 \to pK^-\mu^+\mu^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>-3.5 ±5.0</td><td>±0.2</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17T LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

$\Delta A_{CP}(\Lambda_b^0 \to p\pi^-\pi^+\pi^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>1.1 ±2.5</td><td>±0.6</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Full phase space.

$\Delta A_{CP}(\Lambda_b^0 \to (p\pi^-\pi^+\pi^-)_{LBM})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>3.7 ±4.1</td><td>±0.5</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Measurement done with m(pπ⁻) < 2000 MeV/c² and m(π⁺π⁻) < 1640 MeV/c².

$\Delta A_{CP}(\Lambda_b^0 \to p\alpha_1(1260)^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>-1.5 ±4.2</td><td>±0.6</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

$\Delta A_{CP}(\Lambda_b^0 \to N(1520)^0 \rho(770)^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>2.0 ±4.9</td><td>±0.4</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

$\Delta A_{CP}(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Delta(1232)^{++}\pi^+\pi^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.1 ±3.2</td><td>±0.6</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

$\Delta A_{CP}(\Lambda_b^0 \to pK^-\pi^+\pi^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>3.2 ±1.1</td><td>±0.6</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Full phase space.

$\Delta A_{CP}(\Lambda_b^0 \to (pK^-\pi^+\pi^-)_{LBM})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>3.5 ±1.5</td><td>±0.5</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Measurement done with m(pK⁻) < 2000 MeV/c² and m(π⁺π⁻) < 1640 MeV/c².

$\Delta A_{CP}(\Lambda_b^0 \to N(1520)^0 K^*(892)^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>5.5 ±2.5</td><td>±0.5</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

$\Delta A_{CP}(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda(1520)\rho(770)^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.6 ±6.0</td><td>±0.5</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></table>
ΔA<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → Δ(1232)<sup>++</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

$$
\Delta A_{CP} \equiv A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow \Delta(1232)^{++} K^{-} \pi^{-}) - A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow (\Lambda_{C}^{+} \rightarrow pK^{-} \pi^{+}) \pi^{-}). \quad 1078 < m(p\pi^{+}) < 1432 \text{ MeV.}
$$

VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)

$$
4.4 \pm 2.6 \pm 0.6
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 19AH LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

ΔA<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pK<sub>1</sub>(1410)<sup>-</sup>)

$$
\Delta A_{CP} \equiv A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow pK_{1}(1410)^{-}) - A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow (\Lambda_{C}^{+} \rightarrow pK^{-} \pi^{+}) \pi^{-}). \quad 1200 < m(K^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-}) < 1600 \text{ MeV.}
$$

VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)

$$
4.7 \pm 3.5 \pm 0.8
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 19AH LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

ΔA<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

$$
\Delta A_{CP} \equiv A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow pK^{-} K^{+} \pi^{-}) - A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow (\Lambda_{C}^{+} \rightarrow p\pi^{-} \pi^{+}) \pi^{-}).
$$

VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)

$$
-6.9 \pm 4.9 \pm 0.8
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 19AH LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

¹ Full phase space.

ΔA<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)

$$
\Delta A_{CP} \equiv A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow pK^{-} K^{+} K^{-}) - A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow (\Lambda_{C}^{+} \rightarrow pK^{-} \pi^{+}) \pi^{-}).
$$

VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)

$$
0.2 \pm 1.8 \pm 0.6
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 19AH LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

¹ Full phase space.

ΔA<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → Λ(1520)φ(1020))

$$
\Delta A_{CP} \equiv A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow \Lambda(1520)\phi(1020)) - A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow (\Lambda_{C}^{+} \rightarrow pK^{-} \pi^{+})\pi^{-}). \quad 1460 < m(pK^{-}) < 1600 \text{ MeV and } 1005 < m(K^{+} K^{-}) < 1040 \text{ MeV.}
$$

VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)

$$
4.3 \pm 5.6 \pm 0.4
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 19AH LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

ΔA<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → (pK<sup>-</sup>)<sub>highmass</sub> φ(1020))

$$
\Delta A_{CP} \equiv A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow (pK^{-})_{highmass} \phi(1020)) - A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow (\Lambda_{C} pK^{-} \pi^{+}) \pi^{-}). \quad m(pK^{-}) > 1600 \text{ MeV and } 1005 < m(K^{+} K^{-}) < 1040 \text{ MeV.}
$$

VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)

$$
-0.7 \pm 3.3 \pm 0.7
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 19AH LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

¹ Measurement done with m(pK<sup>-</sup>) > 1600 MeV/c².

ΔA<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → (pK<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)<sub>LBM</sub>)

$$
\Delta A_{CP} \equiv A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow (pK^{-} K^{+} K^{-})_{LBM}) - A_{CP}(\Lambda_{D}^{0} \rightarrow (\Lambda_{C}^{+} \rightarrow pK^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-}). \quad \text{Two-body low invariant-mass region (LBM): } m(pK^{-}) < 2000 \text{ MeVand } m(K^{+}K^{-}) < 1675 \text{ MeV.}
$$

VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)

$$
2.7 \pm 2.3 \pm 0.6
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 19AH LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

¹ Measurement done with m(pK<sup>-</sup>) < 2000 MeV/c² and m(K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>) < 1675 MeV/c².

CP AND T VIOLATION PARAMETERS

Measured values of the triple-product asymmetry parameters, odd under time-reversal, are defined as A<sub>c(s)</sub>(Λ/φ) = (N<sup>+</sup><sub>c(s)</sub> - N<sup>-</sup><sub>c(s)</sub>) / (sum) where N<sup>+</sup><sub>c(s)</sub>, N<sup>-</sup><sub>c(s)</sub> are the number of Λ or φ candidates for which the cos(Φ) and sin(Φ) are observables and positive and negative, respectively. Angles cos(Φ) and sin(Φ) are defined as in LEITNER 07.

A<sub>c</sub>(Λ)

VALUE

$$
-0.22 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.06
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 16J LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

A<sub>s</sub>(Λ)

VALUE

$$
0.13 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.05
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 16J LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

A<sub>c</sub>(φ)

VALUE

$$
-0.01 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.03
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 16J LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

A<sub>s</sub>(φ)

VALUE

$$
-0.07 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.01
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 16J LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

ΔA<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pπ<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

Observable calculated as half of the difference between triple products for Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> and Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>, which is sensitive to CP violation.

VALUE (%)

$$
-0.7 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.2
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 20AB LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
1.15 \pm 1.45 \pm 0.32
$$

$$
2 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 17\text{H LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20AB}
$$

¹ Used both triple product asymmetries and the unbinned energy test method.

² Measured over full phase space of the decay.

a<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

Observable calculated as half of the difference between triple products for Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> and Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>, which is sensitive to CP violation.

VALUE (%)

$$
-0.81 \pm 0.84 \pm 0.31
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 18AG LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ Measured over full phase space of the decay.

a<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

Observable calculated as half of the difference between triple products for Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> and Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>, which is sensitive to CP violation.

VALUE (%)

$$
-0.93 \pm 4.54 \pm 0.42
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 17H LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ Measured over full phase space of the decay.

a<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)

Observable calculated as half of the difference between triple products for Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> and Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>, which is sensitive to CP violation.

VALUE (%)

$$
1.12 \pm 1.51 \pm 0.32
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 18AG LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ Measured over full phase space of the decay.

a<sub>CP</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>)

VALUE (%)

$$
1.2 \pm 5.0 \pm 0.7
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 17T LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

P VIOLATION PARAMETERS

Observables calculated as average of the triple products for Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> and Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>, which is sensitive to parity violation.

a<sub>P</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pπ<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

VALUE (%)

$$
-4.0 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.2
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 20AB LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
-3.71 \pm 1.45 \pm 0.32
$$

$$
2 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 17\text{H LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20AB}
$$

¹ Used both triple product asymmetries and the unbinned energy test method.

² Measured over full phase space of the decay.

a<sub>P</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

VALUE (%)

$$
-0.60 \pm 0.84 \pm 0.31
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 18AG LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ Measured over full phase space of the decay.

a<sub>P</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

VALUE (%)

$$
3.62 \pm 4.54 \pm 0.42
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 17H LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ Measured over full phase space of the decay.

a<sub>P</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)

VALUE (%)

$$
-1.56 \pm 1.51 \pm 0.32
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 18AG LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ Measured over full phase space of the decay.

a<sub>P</sub>(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>)

VALUE (%)

$$
-4.8 \pm 5.0 \pm 0.7
$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 17T LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> DECAY PARAMETERS

See the note on "Baryon Decay Parameters" in the neutron Listings.

α decay parameter for Λ<sub>b</sub> → J/ψΛ

VALUE

-0.017 ± 0.026 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 200 LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$$
-0.022 \pm 0.027
$$

$$
2 \text{ SIRUNYAN} \quad 18\text{R CMS} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV}
$$

$$
-0.14 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.10
$$

$$
3 \text{ AAD} \quad 14\text{L ATLS} \quad \text{pp at 7 TeV}
$$

$$
0.30 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.06
$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
0.05 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.07
$$

$$
4 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 13\text{AG LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 200}
$$

¹ Extracted using a Bayesian analysis. The most probable value is given as -0.022, with a 68% credibility interval [-0.048, 0.005]. Transverse polarizations of Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> of -0.004 (68% credibility interval [-0.064, 0.051]), 0.001 (68% credibility interval [-0.035, 0.045]), and 0.032 (68% credibility interval [-0.011, 0.065]) are also reported at 7 TeV, 8 TeV and 13 TeV, respectively. Note that both statistical and systematic uncertainties are included.

²An angular analysis of Λ<sub>b</sub> → J/ψΛ decay is performed. Note that the sign of α in CMS definition is the opposite to that used by AAIJ 13AG and AAD 14L. Λ<sub>b</sub> transverse production polarization of 0.00 ± 0.06 ± 0.06 is also reported, as well as squares of the helicity amplitudes.

³An angular analysis of Λ<sub>b</sub> → J/ψΛ decay is performed and magnitudes of all helicity amplitudes are also reported.

⁴ An angular analysis of Λ<sub>b</sub> → J/ψΛ decay is performed and a Λ<sub>b</sub> transverse production polarization of 0.06 ± 0.07 ± 0.02 is also reported.
### $\alpha_\gamma$ decay parameter for $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\gamma$

Measures asymmetry between left- and right-handed photons in the decay.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.82<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.26</sub><sup>+0.04</sup><sup>-0.13</sup></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>22M</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 22M provides a combined measurement as well as measured $\alpha_\gamma^-$ = 1.26 ± 0.42 ± 0.20 and $\alpha_\gamma^+$ = 0.55 ± 0.32 ± 0.16 for $\Lambda_b^0$ and $\bar{\Lambda}_b^0$ separately.

### $f_L(\mu\mu)$ longitudinal polarization fraction in $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^+\mu^-$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.61<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.14</sub><sup>+0.03</sup></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AE</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 15AE measurement covers $15.0 < q^2 < 20.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

## FORWARD-BACKWARD ASYMMETRIES

The forward-backward asymmetry is defined as $A_{FB}(\Lambda_b^0) = [N(F) - N(B)] / [N(F) + N(B)]$, where the forward (F) direction corresponds to a particle ($\Lambda_b^0$ or $\bar{\Lambda}_b^0$) sharing valence quark flavors with a beam particle with the same sign of rapidity.

### $A_{FB}(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi\Lambda)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.04<sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.02</sub></td><td>1 ABAZOV</td><td>15I</td><td>D0 pp at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The measured asymmetry integrated over rapidity y in the range of $0.1 < |y| < 2.0$.

### $A_{FB}^\ell(\mu\mu)$ in $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^+\mu^-$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.39<sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.01</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18AP</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The measurement covers $15.0 < q^2 < 20.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

² AAIJ 15AE measurement covers $15.0 < q^2 < 20.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

### $\Delta(A_{FB}^\ell(\mu\mu))$ in $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^+\mu^-$

Difference of asymmetries $A_{FB}^\ell(\mu\mu)$ in $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^+\mu^-$ between $\Lambda_b$ and $\bar{\Lambda}_b$ decays

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.05<sup>+0.09</sup><sub>-0.03</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18AO</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $A_{FB}^\ell(\rho\pi)$ in $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda(\rho\pi)\mu^+\mu^-$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.30<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.02</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18AP</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The measurement covers $15.0 < q^2 < 20.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

² AAIJ 15AE measurement covers $15.0 < q^2 < 20.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

### $A_{FB}^{\ell\ell}$ in $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\mu^+\mu^-$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.25<sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.01</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18AP</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The measurement covers $15.0 < q^2 < 20.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

## $\Lambda_b^0 - \bar{\Lambda}_b^0$ Production Asymmetry

$$A_P(\Lambda_b^0) = [\sigma(\Lambda_b^0) - \sigma(\bar{\Lambda}_b^0)] / [\sigma(\Lambda_b^0) + \sigma(\bar{\Lambda}_b^0)]$$

### $A_P(\Lambda_b^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.4 ± 0.4</td><td>AIRL</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>1.4 ± 0.4</td></tr><tr><td>1.92 ± 0.35</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AJ</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.09 ± 0.29</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AJ</td><td>LHCB pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.11 ± 2.53 ± 1.08</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>17BF</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.44 ± 1.61 ± 0.76</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>17BF</td><td>LHCB pp at 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Integrated over the kinematic range $2 < p_T < 27 \text{ GeV/c}$ and $2.15 < \eta < 4.10$.

² Indirect determination in kinematic range $2 < p_T < 30 \text{ GeV/c}$ and $2.1 < \eta < 4.5$ from production asymmetries of $B^+, B^0$ and $B_s^0$.

## $\Lambda_b^0$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23BB PRL 131 15801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23K JHEP 2307 075</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>22K PRL 128 191803</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>22M PR D105 5051104</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>22R JHEP 2203 153</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21AD PR D104 112008</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21AJ JHEP 2110 060</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21B PL B815 136172</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21R JHEP 2105 095</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AB PR D102 051101</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AK PR D102 112012</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20M JHEP 2005 040</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20O JHEP 2006 110</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>20H PL B802 135203</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AH EPJ C79 745</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AN JHEP 1909 028</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19F JHEP 1903 126</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19Z PRL 123 031801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AF JHEP 1808 131</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AG JHEP 1808 039</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AO JHEP 1809 145 (errat.)</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AP JHEP 1809 146</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AW PL B784 101</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AX PL B784 124</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>18Q JHEP 1802 098</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PDG</td><td>18 PR D98 030001</td><td>M. Tanabashi et al.</td><td>(PDG Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>18BY EPJ C78 457</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>18R PR D97 027010</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17AM PRL 119 062001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BF PL B744 139</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17H NATP 13 391</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17P JHEP 1704 029</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17S JHEP 1705 030</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17T JHEP 1706 108</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16A JHEP 1701 012</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16A CP C40 011001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16J PL B759 282</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16W JHEP 1605 081</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16Y JHEP 1605 132</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAD</td><td>15CH PL B751 63</td><td>G. Aad et al.</td><td>(ATLAS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAD</td><td>15AE JHEP 1506 115</td><td>R. Aad et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AH JHEP 1509 006</td><td>R. Aad et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BG NATP 11 743</td><td>R. Aad et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>15I PR D91 072008</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAD</td><td>14I PR D89 092009</td><td>G. Aad et al.</td><td>(ATLAS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AA PRL 112 202001</td><td>R. Aad et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14E JHEP 1404 114</td><td>R. Aad et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14H PR D89 032001</td><td>R. Aad et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14I JHEP 1408 143</td><td>R. Aad et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14K JHEP 1407 103</td><td>R. Aad et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14Q JHEP 1404 087</td><td>R. Aad et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14U PL B734 122</td><td>R. Aad et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14B PR D89 072014</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14P PRL 113 242001</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PDG</td><td>14 CP C38 070001</td><td>K. Olive et al.</td><td>(PDG Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAD</td><td>13U PR D87 032002</td><td>G. Aad et al.</td><td>(ATLAS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AG PL B724 27</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AJ PL B725 25</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AV PRL 110 182001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13BB PRL 111 102003</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHATRYCHAN</td><td>13AC JHEP 1307 163</td><td>S. Chatrychan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AR JHEP 1210 037</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>12E PL B708 241</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12A PR D85 032003</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>12U PR D85 112003</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>11E PR D84 092001</td><td>R. Aad et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>11E PR D85 039904 (errat.)</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11 PRL 106 121804</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11A PRL 107 201802</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11N PRL 106 181802</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>11O PR D84 031102</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>10B PR D104 102002</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>09C PR D103 031801</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>09E PR D79 032001</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>07S PR 99 142001</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>07U PR 99 182001</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABULENCIA</td><td>05O PR D72 051104</td><td>A. Abulencia et al.</td><td>(FINAL CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABULENCIA</td><td>04A PL B856 63</td><td>J. Abdallah et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABULENCIA</td><td>02G PR D66 112002</td><td>D. Acosta et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>99W PL C10 185</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>98G PL B426 161</td><td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARATE</td><td>98D EPJ C2 197</td><td>R. Barate et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>97B PR D55 1142</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>96M PRL 77 1439</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>96D ZPHY C71 199</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>96N PL B374 351</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADAM</td><td>96D ZPHY C72 207</td><td>W. Adam et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96L PL B380 442</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96V PL B384 471</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PDG</td><td>96D PL D54 1</td><td>R. M. Barnett et al.</td><td>(PDG Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>95S ZPHY C68 375</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AKERS</td><td>95K PL B353 402</td><td>R. Akers et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>93B PL B357 605</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>93B PR D47 2639</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>92E BUSKULIC</td><td>92E PL B294 145</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALBAJAR</td><td>91E PL B273 540</td><td>C. Albajar et al.</td><td>(UA1 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARI</td><td>91C NC 104A 1787</td><td>G. Bari et al.</td><td>(CERN R422 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ARENTON</td><td>86 NP B274 707</td><td>M.W. Arenton et al.</td><td>(ARIZ, NDAM, VAND)</td></tr><tr><td>BASILE</td><td>81 LNC 31 97</td><td>M. Basile et al.</td><td>(CERN R415 Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$\Lambda_b(5912)^0$$

$$J^P = \frac{1}{2}^-$$

Status: ***

Quantum numbers are based on quark model expectations.

## $\Lambda_b(5912)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>5912.19 ± 0.03 ± 0.17</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5912.32 ± 0.12 ± 0.17</td><td>2 SIRUNYAN</td><td>20K</td><td>CMS pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

5912.20 ± 0.13 ± 0.17 3,4 AAIJ 12AT LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20Q

¹ AAIJ 20Q measures $m(\Lambda_b(5912)^0) - m(\Lambda_b^0) = 292.589 \pm 0.029 \pm 0.010$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.60 \pm 0.17$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

² SIRUNYAN 20k measures $m(\Lambda_b(5912)^0) - m(\Lambda_b^0) = 292.72 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.01$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.60 \pm 0.17$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.
³ Observed in $\Lambda_b(5912)^0 \to \Lambda_b^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays with 17.6 ± 4.8 candidates with a significance of 5.2 sigma.

⁴ AAIJ 12AL measures $m(\Lambda_b(5912)^0) - m(\Lambda_b^0) = 292.60 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.04$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.60 \pm 0.17$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

### $\Lambda_b(5912)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><u>&lt;0.25</u></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.66</td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AL</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20Q</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(5912)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_i/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1$</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(5912)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ($\Lambda_b^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>1</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>Γ<sub>1</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>SIRUNYAN</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td></tr></tbody></table><table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>20K CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AL LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(5912)^0$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20Q JHEP 2006 136</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>20K PL B803 135345</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AL PRL 109 172003</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Lambda_b(5920)^0 $$

$$ J^P = \frac{3}{2}^- \quad \text{Status: } \ast\ast $$

Quantum numbers are based on quark model expectations.

### $\Lambda_b(5920)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>5920.09 ± 0.17 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>5920.09 ± 0.02 ± 0.17</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5920.16 ± 0.07 ± 0.17</td><td>2 SIRUNYAN</td><td>20K CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>5919.4 ± 0.5 ± 0.2</td><td>3,4 AALTONEN</td><td>13V CDF</td><td>pP at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5920.00 ± 0.09 ± 0.17</td><td>5,6 AAIJ</td><td>12AL LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20Q</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 20Q measures $m(\Lambda_b(5920)^0) - m(\Lambda_b^0) = 300.492 \pm 0.019 \pm 0.010$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.60 \pm 0.17$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

² SIRUNYAN 20K measures $m(\Lambda_b(5920)^0) - m(\Lambda_b^0) = 300.56 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.01$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.60 \pm 0.17$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

³ Measured in $\Lambda_b(5920)^0 \to \Lambda_b^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays with $17.3^{+5.3}_{-4.6}$ events, with a significance of 3.5 sigma.

⁴ AALTONEN 13V measures $m(\Lambda_b(5920)^0) - m(\Lambda_b^0) - 2m(\pi) = 20.68 \pm 0.35 \pm 0.30$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.60 \pm 0.17$ MeV and $m(\pi) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

⁵ Observed in $\Lambda_b(5920)^0 \to \Lambda_b^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays with $52.5 \pm 8.1$ candidates with a significance of 10.2 sigma.

⁶ AAIJ 12AL measures $m(\Lambda_b(5920)^0) - m(\Lambda_b^0) = 300.40 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.04$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.60 \pm 0.17$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

### $\Lambda_b(5920)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><u>&lt;0.19</u></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.63</td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AL LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20Q</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(5920)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_i/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1$</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(5920)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ($\Lambda_b^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>1</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>Γ<sub>1</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ 20Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>SIRUNYAN 20K LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>AALTONEN 13V CDF pP at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ 12AL LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(5920)^0$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20Q JHEP 2006 136</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>20K PL B803 135345</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>13V PR D88 071101</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AL PRL 109 172003</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Lambda_b(6070)^0 $$

$$ J^P = \frac{1}{2}^+ \quad \text{Status: } \ast\ast $$

Quantum numbers are based on quark model expectations.

### $\Lambda_b(6070)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6072.3 ± 2.9 ± 0.2</strong></td><td><sup>1</sup>AAIJ</td><td>20Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 20Q measures $m(\Lambda_b(6070)^0) - m(\Lambda_b^0) = 452.7 \pm 2.9 \pm 0.5$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.60 \pm 0.17$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

### $\Lambda_b(6070)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>72 ± 11 ± 2</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(6070)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_i/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1$</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(6070)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ($\Lambda_b^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>1</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>Γ<sub>1</sub>/Γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ 20Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(6070)^0$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20Q JHEP 2006 136</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Lambda_b(6146)^0 $$

$$ J^P = \frac{3}{2}^+ \quad \text{Status: } \ast\ast $$

Quantum numbers are based on quark model expectations.

### $\Lambda_b(6146)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6146.2 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6146.5 ± 2.1 ± 0.2</td><td>1 SIRUNYAN</td><td>20K CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6146.17 ± 0.33 ± 0.27</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>19AJ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ SIRUNYAN 20K measures $m(\Lambda_b(6146)^0) - m(\Lambda_b^0) = 526.9 \pm 1.9 \pm 0.8$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.60 \pm 0.17$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

² Observed in $\Lambda_b^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ mode.

<table><thead><tr><th>$m_{\Lambda_b(6146)^0} - m_{\Lambda_b^0}$</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>526.55 ± 0.33 ± 0.10</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AJ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Observed in $\Lambda_b^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ mode.

### $\Lambda_b(6146)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2.9 ± 1.3 ± 0.3</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AJ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Observed in $\Lambda_b^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ mode.
### $\Lambda_b(6146)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_f/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1$</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(6146)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ($\Lambda_b^0\pi^+\pi^−$)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>20K LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AJ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(6146)^0$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>20K PL B803 135345</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AJ PRL 123 152001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Lambda_b(6152)^0 $$

$$ J^P = \frac{5}{2} + \text{Status: } \ast\ast\ast $$

Quantum numbers are based on quark model expectations.

### $\Lambda_b(6152)^0$ MASS

#### $\Lambda_b(6152)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6152.5 ±0.4</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6152.7 ±1.2 ±0.2</td><td>1 SIRUNYAN</td><td>20K CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6152.51 ±0.26 ±0.27</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>19AJ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 SIRUNYAN 20K measures $m(\Lambda_b(6152)^0) - m(\Lambda_b^0) = 533.1 \pm 1.1$ ± 0.4 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.60 \pm 0.17$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.
2 Observed in $\Lambda_b^0\pi^+\pi^−$ mode.

$$ m_{\Lambda_b(6152)^0} - m_{\Lambda_b^0} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>532.89 ±0.26 ±0.10</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AJ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ m_{\Lambda_b(6152)^0} - m_{\Lambda_b(6146)^0} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6.34 ±0.32 ±0.02</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AJ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

#### $\Lambda_b(6152)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2.1 ±0.8 ±0.3</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AJ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(6152)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_f/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1$</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(6152)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ($\Lambda_b^0\pi^+\pi^−$)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>20K LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AJ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Lambda_b(6152)^0$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>20K PL B803 135345</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AJ PRL 123 152001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Sigma_b $$

$$ I(J^P) = 1(\frac{1}{2}^+) \text{ Status: } \ast\ast\ast $$

In the quark model $\Sigma_b^+, \Sigma_b^0, \Sigma_b^−$ are an isotriplet (uub, udb, ddb) state. The lowest $\Sigma_b$ ought to have $J^P = 1/2^+$. None of I, J, or P have actually been measured.

### $\Sigma_b$ MASS

$$ \Sigma_b^+ MASS $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5810.56 ±0.25</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5810.55 ±0.11 ±0.23</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5811.3 ±0.9 ±1.7</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12F CDF</td><td>p p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 5807.8^{+2.0}_{-2.2} \pm 1.7 \quad 3 \text{ AALTONEN} \quad 07K \text{ CDF} \quad \text{Repl. by AALTONEN 12F} $$

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^−\pi^+$ decays.

2 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to K^−\pi^+$ decays.

3 Observed four $\Lambda_b^0\pi^+\pi^−$ resonances in the fully reconstructed decay mode $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$, where $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^−\pi^+$.

$$ \Sigma_b^- MASS $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5815.64 ±0.27</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5815.64 ±0.14 ±0.24</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5815.5 ±0.6 ±1.7</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12F CDF</td><td>p p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 5815.2 \pm 1.0 \pm 1.7 \quad 3 \text{ AALTONEN} \quad 07K \text{ CDF} \quad \text{Repl. by AALTONEN 12F} $$

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^−\pi^+$ decays.

2 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to K^−\pi^+$ decays.

3 Observed four $\Lambda_b^0\pi^+\pi^−$ resonances in the fully reconstructed decay mode $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$, where $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^−\pi^+$.

$$ m_{\Sigma_b^+} - m_{\Sigma_b^-} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-5.06 ±0.18</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-5.09 ±0.18 ±0.01</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-4.2 ±1.1 ±0.1</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12F CDF</td><td>p p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^−\pi^+$ decays.

### $\Sigma_b$ WIDTH

$$ \Sigma_b^+ WIDTH $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5.0 ±0.5</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.83 ±0.31 ±0.37</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>9.7 ±3.8 ±1.2</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12F CDF</td><td>p p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^−\pi^+$ decays.

2 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to K^−\pi^+$ decays.

$$ \Sigma_b^- WIDTH $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5.3 ±0.5</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.33 ±0.42 ±0.37</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>4.9 ±3.1 ±1.1</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12F CDF</td><td>p p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^−\pi^+$ decays.

2 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to K^−\pi^+$ decays.

### $\Sigma_b$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_f/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1$</td><td>dominant</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Sigma_b$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ($\Lambda_b^0\pi^+\pi^−$)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>dominant</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>07K CDF</td><td>p p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Sigma_b$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19A PRL 122 012001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12F PR D85 092011</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>07K PRL 99 202001</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Sigma_b^* $$

$$ I(J^P) = 1(\frac{3}{2}^+) \text{ Status: } \ast\ast\ast \quad I, J, P \text{ need confirmation.} $$

I, J, P need confirmation. Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions.

### $\Sigma_b^*$ MASS

$$ \Sigma_b^* MASS $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5830.32 ±0.27</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5830.28 ±0.14 ±0.24</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5832.1 ±0.7 ±1.7</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12F CDF</td><td>p p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^−\pi^+$ decays.

2 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^−$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to K^−\pi^+$ decays.
$\Sigma_b^*-$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5834.74 ± 0.30</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5834.73 ± 0.17 ± 0.25</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5835.1 ± 0.6 <sup>+1.7</sup><sub>-1.8</sub></td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12F</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$ decays.

2 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to K^- \pi^+$ decays.

$m_{\Sigma_b^+} - m_{\Sigma_b^-}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-4.37 ± 0.33</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.6.</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-4.45 ± 0.22 ± 0.01</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-3.0 <sup>+1.0</sup><sub>-0.9</sub></td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12F</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$ decays.

2 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to K^- \pi^+$ decays.

$m_{\Sigma_b^+} - m_{\Sigma_b^-}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>19.73 ± 0.18 ± 0.01</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$ decays.

$m_{\Sigma_b^-} - m_{\Sigma_b^+}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>19.09 ± 0.22 ± 0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$ decays.

$\Sigma_b^*$ WIDTH

$\Sigma_b^+$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>9.4 ± 0.5</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>9.34 ± 0.47 ± 0.26</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>11.5 <sup>+2.7</sup><sub>-2.2</sub></td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12F</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$ decays.

2 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to K^- \pi^+$ decays.

$\Sigma_b^-$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>10.4 ± 0.8</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.3.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>10.68 ± 0.60 ± 0.33</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>7.5 <sup>+2.2</sup><sub>-1.8</sub></td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12F</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$ decays.

2 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to K^- \pi^+$ decays.

$m_{\Sigma_b^-} - m_{\Sigma_b^+}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>21.2 ± 2.0 ± 0.4</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><sup>+1.9</sup><sub>-0.3</sub></td><td>1 AALTONEN</td><td>07K</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Observed four $\Lambda_b^0 \pi^\pm$ resonances in the fully reconstructed decay mode $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$, where $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$. Assumes $m_{\Sigma_b^+} - m_{\Sigma_b^-} = m_{\Sigma_b^-} - m_{\Sigma_b^+}$.

$\Sigma_b^*$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Λ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>π</td><td>dominant</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Sigma_b^*$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(Λ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>π)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>dominant</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>07K</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Sigma_b^*$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>PRL 122 012001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12F</td><td>PR D85 092011</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>07K</td><td>PRL 99 202001</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$\Sigma_b(6097)^+$

$J^P = ?$ Status: ***

$\Sigma_b(6097)^+$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6095.8 ± 1.7 ± 0.4</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$ decays.

$m_{\Sigma_b(6097)^+} - m_{\Sigma_b(6097)^-}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-2.2 <sup>+2.4</sup><sub>-0.3</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$ decays.

$\Sigma_b(6097)^+$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>31.0 ± 5.5 ± 0.7</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$ decays.

$\Sigma_b(6097)^+$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Λ<sub>b</sub>π<sup>+</sup> × B(b → Σ<sub>b</sub>(6097)<sup>+</sup>)</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Sigma_b(6097)^+$ BRANCHING RATIOS

$\Gamma(\Lambda_b \pi^+ \times B(b \to \Sigma_b(6097)^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Sigma_b(6097)^+$ REFERENCES

AAIJ 19A PRL 122 012001 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

$\Sigma_b(6097)^-$

$J^P = ?$ Status: ***

$\Sigma_b(6097)^-$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6090.8 ± 1.7 ± 0.5</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$ decays.

$\Sigma_b(6097)^-$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>28.9 ± 4.2 ± 0.9</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$ decays.

$\Sigma_b(6097)^-$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Λ<sub>b</sub>π<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Σ<sub>b</sub>(6097)<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Sigma_b(6097)^-$ BRANCHING RATIOS

$\Gamma(\Lambda_b \pi^- \times B(b \to \Sigma_b(6097)^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Sigma_b(6097)^-$ REFERENCES

AAIJ 19A PRL 122 012001 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)
In the quark model, $\Xi_b^0$ and $\Xi_b^-$ are an isodoublet (usb, dsb) state;

the lowest $\Xi_b^0$ and $\Xi_b^-$ ought to have $J^P = 1/2^+$. None of $I, J, \text{ or } P$ have actually been measured.

$\Xi_b^-$ MASS

$\Xi_b^-$ MASS

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

**5797.0 ± 0.6** **OUR AVERAGE** Error includes scale factor of 1.7. See the ideogram below.

$5796.70 \pm 0.39 \pm 0.23$

AAIJ

19AB LHCB

pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV

$5797.72 \pm 0.46 \pm 0.31$

1 AAIJ

14BJ LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$5793.4 \pm 1.8 \pm 0.7$

2 AALTONEN

14B CDF

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$5774 \pm 11 \pm 15$

3 ABAZOV

07K D0

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$5795.8 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.4$

4 AAIJ

13AV LHCB

Repl. by AAIJ 19AB

$5796.7 \pm 5.1 \pm 1.4$

5 AALTONEN

11X CDF

Repl. by AALTONEN 14B

$5790.9 \pm 2.6 \pm 0.8$

6 AALTONEN

09AP CDF

Repl. by AALTONEN 14B

$5792.9 \pm 2.5 \pm 1.7$

7 AALTONEN

07A CDF

Repl. by AALTONEN 09AP

1. Reconstructed in $\Xi_b^-$ to $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$, $\Xi_b^0\pi^- \to pK^-K^-\pi^+$ decays. Reference $\Lambda_b^0$ mass = 172.44 ± 0.39 ± 0.17 MeV from AAIJ 14Z.

2. Uses $\Xi_b^-$ to $J/\psi\Xi^-$ and $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$ decays.

3. Observed in $\Xi_b^-$ to $J/\psi\Xi^-$ decays with $15.2 \pm 4.4^{+1.9}_{-0.4}$ candidates, a significance of 5.5 sigma.

4. Measured in $\Xi_b^-$ to $J/\psi\Xi^-$ decays.

5. Measured in $\Xi_b^-$ to $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$ with $25.8^{+5.5}_{-5.2}$ candidates.

6. Measured in $\Xi_b^-$ to $J/\psi\Xi^-$ decays with $66^{+14}_{-9}$ candidates.

7. Observed in $\Xi_b^-$ to $J/\psi\Xi^-$ decays with $17.5 \pm 4.3$ candidates, a significance of 7.7 sigma.

<figure><img src="image_752.png" /></figure>

$m_{\Xi_b^-} - m_{\Lambda_b^0}$

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

**177.46 ± 0.31** **OUR AVERAGE** Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.

$177.71 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.16$

1 AAIJ

21 LHCB

pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$177.08 \pm 0.47 \pm 0.16$

2 AAIJ

17BE LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$176.2 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.1$

3 AAIJ

13AV LHCB

pp at 7 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$177.73 \pm 0.33 \pm 0.14$

4 AAIJ

17BE LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$178.36 \pm 0.46 \pm 0.16$

1.5 AAIJ

14BJ LHCB

Repl. by AAIJ 2021

<figure><img src="image_753.png" /></figure>

1. Reconstructed in $\Xi_b^-$ to $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$, $\Xi_b^0\pi^- \to pK^-K^-\pi^+$ decays. Reference decays $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_b^+\pi^-$ were used.

2. Reconstructed in $\Xi_b^-$ to $J/\psi\Lambda K^-$ decays. Reference decays $\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi\Lambda$ were used.

3. Reconstructed in $\Xi_b^-$ to $J/\psi\Xi^-$ decays.

4. Combination of the original statistically independent measurements of AAIJ 17BE and AAIJ 14BJ taking into account correlation between systematic uncertainties.

5. Combined with AAIJ 17BE.

$m_{\Xi_b^-} - m_{\Xi_b^0}$

VALUE (MeV)

5.9 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE

$5.92 \pm 0.60 \pm 0.23$

$3.1 \pm 5.6 \pm 1.3$

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

1 AAIJ

14BJ LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

2 AALTONEN

11X CDF

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

1. Reconstructed in $\Xi_b^-$ to $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$, $\Xi_b^0\pi^- \to pK^-K^-\pi^+$ decays. Uses $m(\Xi_b^0) - m(\Lambda_b^0)$ = 172.44 ± 0.39 ± 0.17 MeV from AAIJ 14Z.

2. Derived from measurements in $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_b^0\pi^-$ and $\Xi_b^-$ to $J/\psi\Xi^-$ from AALTONEN 09AP taking correlated systematic uncertainties into account.

$\Xi_b^-$ MEAN LIFE

"OUR EVALUATION" is an average using rescaled values of the data listed below. The average and rescaling were performed by the Heavy Flavor Approaching Group (HFLAV) and are described at https://hflav.web.cern.ch/. The averaging/rescaling procedure takes into account correlations between the measurements and asymmetric lifetime errors.

$\Xi_b^-$ MEAN LIFE

VALUE (10⁻¹² s)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

**1.572 ± 0.040** **OUR EVALUATION** (Produced by HFLAV)

**1.57 ± 0.05** **OUR AVERAGE** Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.

$1.599 \pm 0.041 \pm 0.022$

1 AAIJ

14BJ LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$1.55 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.03$

2 AAIJ

14T LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$1.32 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.02$

AALTONEN

14B CDF

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$1.56 \pm 0.27 \pm 0.02$

3 AALTONEN

09AP CDF

Repl. by AALTONEN 14B

1. Reconstructed in $\Xi_b^-$ to $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$, $\Xi_b^0\pi^- \to pK^-K^-\pi^+$ decays. Reference $\Lambda_b^0$ lifetime = 1.479 ± 0.009 ± 0.010 ps from AAIJ 14U.

2. Measured in $\Xi_b^-$ to $J/\psi\Xi^-$ decays.

3. Measured in $\Xi_b^-$ to $J/\psi\Xi^-$ decays with $66^{+14}_{-9}$ candidates.

<figure><img src="image_754.png" /></figure>

MEAN LIFE RATIOS

$\tau_{\Xi_b^-} / \tau_{\Lambda_b^0}$ mean life ratio

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$1.089 \pm 0.026 \pm 0.011$

1 AAIJ

14BJ LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

1. Reconstructed in $\Xi_b^-$ to $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$, $\Xi_b^0\pi^- \to pK^-K^-\pi^+$ decays. Reference $\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_b^+\pi^-$.

$\tau_{\Xi_b^-} / \tau_{\Xi_b^0}$ mean life ratio

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$1.083 \pm 0.032 \pm 0.016$

1 AAIJ

14BJ LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

1. Reconstructed in $\Xi_b^-$ to $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$, $\Xi_b^0\pi^- \to pK^-K^-\pi^+$ decays. Uses $\Xi_b^0$ measurements from AAIJ 14Z.

$\Xi_b^-$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>f</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Confidence level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> J/ψΞ<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>-</sup>)</td><td>(1.02<sup>+0.26</sup><sub>-0.21</sub>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> J/ψΛK<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>-</sup>)</td><td>(2.5 ± 0.4) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub> pK<sup>-</sup> K<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>-</sup>)</td><td>(3.7 ± 0.8) × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub> pK<sup>-</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td><td>seen</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>5</sub> pπ<sup>-</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
Baryon Particle Listings

$$ \Xi_b^- $$

$$ \Gamma_6 \quad pK^- \pi^- \qquad \text{seen} $$

$$ \Gamma_7 \quad \Lambda_b^0 \pi^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-)/B(b \to \Lambda_b^0) \quad (7.0 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_8 \quad \Xi_b^0 \pi^- \qquad \text{seen} $$

$$ \Gamma_9 \quad \Sigma(1385) K^- \quad (2.6 \pm 2.3) \times 10^{-7} $$

$$ \Gamma_{10} \quad \Lambda(1405) K^- \quad (1.9 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-7} $$

$$ \Gamma_{11} \quad \Lambda(1520) K^- \quad (7.6 \pm 3.2) \times 10^{-7} $$

$$ \Gamma_{12} \quad \Lambda(1670) K^- \quad (4.5 \pm 2.3) \times 10^{-7} $$

$$ \Gamma_{13} \quad \Sigma(1775) K^- \quad (2.2 \pm 1.5) \times 10^{-7} $$

$$ \Gamma_{14} \quad \Sigma(1915) K^- \quad (2.6 \pm 2.5) \times 10^{-7} $$

$$ \Gamma_{15} \quad \Xi^- \gamma \quad < 1.3 \times 10^{-4} \quad 95\% $$

$\Xi_b^-$ BRANCHING RATIOS

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi\Xi^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{1/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

0.102$^{+0.026}_{-0.021}$ OUR AVERAGE

$$ 0.098^{+0.023}_{-0.016} \pm 0.014 \quad 1 \text{ AALTONEN} \quad 09AP CDF \quad p\bar{p} \text{ at } 1.96 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ 0.16 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.02 \quad 2 \text{ ABAZOV} \quad 07K D0 \quad p\bar{p} \text{ at } 1.96 \text{ TeV} $$

1 AALTONEN 09AP reports $[\Gamma(\Xi_b^- \to J/\psi\Xi^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\Lambda \times B(b \to \Lambda_b^0))] = 0.167^{+0.037}_{-0.025} \pm 0.012$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\Lambda \times B(b \to \Lambda_b^0)) = (5.8 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 ABAZOV 07K reports $[\Gamma(\Xi_b^- \to J/\psi\Xi^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\Lambda \times B(b \to \Lambda_b^0))] = 0.28 \pm 0.09^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\Lambda \times B(b \to \Lambda_b^0)) = (5.8 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi\Lambda K^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{2/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ 2.45 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.35 \quad 1,2 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 17BE LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ and } 8 \text{ TeV} $$

1 AAIJ 17BE reports $[\Gamma(\Xi_b^- \to J/\psi\Lambda K^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\Lambda \times B(b \to \Lambda_b^0))] = (4.19 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.15) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\Lambda \times B(b \to \Lambda_b^0)) = (5.8 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Integrated over the b-baryon transverse momentum $p_T < 25$ GeV and rapidity $2.0 < y < 4.5$.

$$ \Gamma(pK^- K^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{3/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-8}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ 3.7 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.2 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 17F LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

1 AAIJ 17F reports $[\Gamma(\Xi_b^- \to pK^- K^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Xi_b^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to K^+ K^- K^+)] / [B(\bar{b} \to B^+)] = (2.65 \pm 0.35 \pm 0.47) \times 10^{-3}$ which we multiply by our best values $B(B^+ \to K^+ K^- K^+) = (3.40 \pm 0.14) \times 10^{-5}$, $B(\bar{b} \to B^+) = (40.8 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(pK^- K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{4/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ 2.3 \pm 0.9 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Obtained using the ratio of fragmentation and branching fractions relative to the $B^- \to K^+ K^- K^-$ decay.

$$ \Gamma(p\pi^- \pi^-)/\Gamma(pK^- K^-) \quad \Gamma_{5/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ \text{CL\%} \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ <0.56 \quad 90 \quad 1AAIJ \quad 17F LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ \Gamma(pK^- \pi^-)/\Gamma(pK^- K^-) \quad \Gamma_{6/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ 0.98 \pm 0.27 \pm 0.09 \quad 17F LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_b^0 \pi^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-)/B(b \to \Lambda_b^0))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{7/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

7.0$\pm$0.9 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 7.3 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.6 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 23AV LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 13 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ 5.7 \pm 1.8^{+0.8}_{-0.9} \quad 2 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 15BA LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Measured in the decay chain of $\Xi_b^- \to \Lambda_b^0 \pi^-$, $\Lambda_b^- \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Lambda_b^- \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^- \pi^+$, with $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$.

2 A signal is reported with a significance of 3.2 standard deviations in the decay chain of $\Xi_b^- \to \Lambda_b^0 \pi^-$, $\Lambda_b^- \to \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-$, and $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+$.

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_b^0 \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{8/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ \text{seen} \quad 16O \quad LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma(1385) K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{9/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ 0.26 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.20 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ and } 13 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Obtained from an amplitude analysis of quasi-two-body contributions to the $\Xi_b^- \to RK^-$ decay, with $R \to pK^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda(1405) K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{10/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ 0.19 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.10 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ and } 13 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Obtained from an amplitude analysis of quasi-two-body contributions to the $\Xi_b^- \to RK^-$ decay, with $R \to pK^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda(1520) K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{11/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ 0.76 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.31 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ and } 13 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Obtained from an amplitude analysis of quasi-two-body contributions to the $\Xi_b^- \to RK^-$ decay, with $R \to pK^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda(1670) K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{12/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ 0.45 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.22 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ and } 13 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Obtained from an amplitude analysis of quasi-two-body contributions to the $\Xi_b^- \to RK^-$ decay, with $R \to pK^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma(1775) K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{13/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ 0.22 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.13 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ and } 13 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Obtained from an amplitude analysis of quasi-two-body contributions to the $\Xi_b^- \to RK^-$ decay, with $R \to pK^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma(1915) K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{14/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ 0.26 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.23 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ and } 13 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Obtained from an amplitude analysis of quasi-two-body contributions to the $\Xi_b^- \to RK^-$ decay, with $R \to pK^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\Xi^- \gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{15/\Gamma} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ \text{CL\%} \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ <1.3 \times 10^{-4} \quad 95 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 22F LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 13 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Used $\Xi_b^- \to \Xi^- J/\psi$ as normalization and an integrated luminosity of $5.4 \text{ fb}^{-1}$.

P VIOLATION ASYMMETRY

$$ A_P(\Xi_b^-) \Xi_b^- \to \Xi_b^+ \text{ production asymmetry} $$

$$ A_P(\Xi_b^-) = [\sigma(\Xi_b^-) - \sigma(\Xi_b^+)] / [\sigma(\Xi_b^-) + \sigma(\Xi_b^+)] $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-2}) \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

-2 $\pm$4 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 1.1 \pm 5.6 \pm 1.9 \quad 1,2 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 19AB LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ and } 8 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ -3.9 \pm 4.9 \pm 2.5 \quad 1,2 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 19AB LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 13 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Baryon kinematic range $p_T < 20$ GeV/c and $2 < \eta < 6$.

2 Measured using previous measurements of $A_P(\Lambda_b)$ in AAIJ 17BF.

CP VIOLATION in $\Xi_b$ deays

$$ A_{CP}(\Xi_b^-) = [B(\Xi_b^- \to f) - B(\Xi_b^+ \to \bar{f})] / \text{Sum} $$

$$ A_{CP}(\Xi_b^- \to \Sigma(1385) K^-) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ (-27 \pm 34 \pm 73) \times 10^{-2} \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ A_{CP}(\Xi_b^- \to \Lambda(1405) K^-) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ (-1 \pm 24 \pm 32) \times 10^{-2} \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ A_{CP}(\Xi_b^- \to \Lambda(1520) K^-) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ (-5 \pm 9 \pm 8) \times 10^{-2} \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ (3 \pm 14 \pm 10) \times 10^{-2} \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ A_{CP}(\Xi_b^- \to \Sigma(1775) K^-) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ (-47 \pm 26 \pm 14) \times 10^{-2} \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ A_{CP}(\Xi_b^- \to \Sigma(1915) K^-) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ (11 \pm 26 \pm 22) \times 10^{-2} \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21AH LHCB \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$
$\Xi_b^-$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AV PR D108 072002</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>22F JHEP 2201 069</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21 PR D103 012004</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21AH PR D104 052010</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AB PR D99 052006</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BE PL B772 265</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BF PL B774 139</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17F PR 118 071801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16O PR D93 092007</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BA PRL 115 241801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AA PRL 112 202001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14BJ PRL 113 242002</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14T PL B736 154</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14U PL B734 122</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14Z PRL 113 032001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14B PR D89 072014</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AV PRL 110 182001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11X PRL 107 102001</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>09AP PR D80 072003</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>07A PRL 99 052002</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>07K PRL 99 052001</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr></table>

<figure><img src="image_755.png" /></figure>

$I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(1^+)$ Status: ***
$I, J, P$ need confirmation.

In the quark model, $\Xi_b^0$ and $\Xi_b^-$ are an isodoublet (usb, dsb) state;
the lowest $\Xi_b^0$ and $\Xi_b^-$ ought to have $J^P = 1/2^+$. None of $I, J, P$ or
$P$ have actually been measured.

$\Xi_b^0$ MASS

$\Xi_b^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5791.9 ±0.5</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5794.3 ±2.4 ±0.7</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5791.80 ±0.39 ±0.31</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14Z</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5788.7 ±4.3 ±1.4</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>14B</td><td>CDF p p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>5787.8 ±5.0 ±1.3</td><td>3 AALTONEN</td><td>11X</td><td>CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 14B</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">1 Uses $\Xi_b^0 \rightarrow \Xi_c^+ \pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+ \rightarrow pK^- \pi^+$ decays. The measurement comes from the mass difference of $\Xi_b^0$ and $\Lambda_b^0$.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">2 Uses $\Xi_b^0 \rightarrow \Xi_c^+ \pi^-$ decays.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">3 Measured in $\Xi_b^0 \rightarrow \Xi_c^+ \pi^-$ with $25.3^{+5.6}_{-5.4}$ candidates.</td></tr></tbody></table>

$m_{\Xi_b^0} - m_{\Xi_b^0}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>172.5 ±0.4</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>174.8 ±2.4 ±0.5</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>172.44 ±0.39 ±0.17</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14Z</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Xi_b^0$ MEAN LIFE

"OUR EVALUATION" is an average using rescaled values of the data listed below. The average and rescaling were performed by the Heavy Flavor Av- eraging Group (HFLAV) and are described at https://hflav.web.cern.ch/. The averaging/rescaling procedure takes into account correlations between the measurements and asymmetric lifetime errors.

$\Xi_b^0$ MEAN LIFE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.480 ±0.030</strong> OUR EVALUATION</td><td></td><td></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr><tr><td>1.477 ±0.026 ±0.019</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14Z</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\tau_{mix}$ (1/2$\pi$) times the oscillation period

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (s)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&gt;13 × 10<sup>-12</sup></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17BH</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Xi_b^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>i</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Confidence level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> pD<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)</td><td>(1.7 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td rowspan="2">90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> pK<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)/B(¯b → B<sup>0</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 1.6</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub> pK<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)/B(¯b → B<sup>0</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 1.1</td><td>90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub> Λπ<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)/B(b → Λ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 1.7</td><td>90%</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>5</sub> ΛK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)/B(b → Λ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 8</td><td>× 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>6</sub> ΛK<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)/B(b → Λ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 3</td><td>× 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90%</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>7</sub> J/ψΛ</td><td>seen</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>8</sub> J/ψΞ<sup>0</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>9</sub> Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)</td><td>(6 ± 4 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>10</sub> pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)/B(b → Λ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)</td><td>(1.9 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>11</sub> pK<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)/B(b → Λ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)</td><td>(1.70 ± 0.30 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>12</sub> pK<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)/B(b → Λ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup>)</td><td>(1.7 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr></table>

$\Xi_b^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.7 ±0.4 ±0.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 14H reports $[\Gamma(\Xi_b \rightarrow pD^0 K^- \times B(\bar{b} \rightarrow \Xi_b))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}]/[B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon})]/[B(\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow pD^0 K^-)] = 0.44 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.06$ which we multiply by our best values $B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow pD^0 K^-) = (4.5 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL<sub>%</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL<sub>%</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL<sub>%</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16W</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL<sub>%</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.8 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16W</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL<sub>%</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16W</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (J/ψΛ)/Γ(J/ψΞ<sup>0</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.2 ±2.1 ±0.9</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20U</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The Cabibbo suppressed $\Xi_b \rightarrow J/\psi \Lambda$ decay is observed for the first time.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.36 ±0.19 ±0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 14H reports $[\Gamma(\Xi_b \rightarrow \Lambda_c^+ K^- \times B(\bar{b} \rightarrow \Xi_b))/\Gamma(\Xi_b \rightarrow pD^0 K^- \times B(\bar{b} \rightarrow \Xi_b))] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \rightarrow pK^- \pi^+)] / [B(D^0 \rightarrow K^- \pi^+)] = 0.57 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.21$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\Lambda_c^+ \rightarrow pK^- \pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(D^0 \rightarrow K^- \pi^+) = (3.947 \pm 0.030) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.89 ±0.35 ±0.16</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 18Q reports $[\Gamma(\Xi_b \rightarrow pK^- \pi^+ \times B(b \rightarrow \Xi_b^0)/B(b \rightarrow \Lambda_b^0))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}]/[B(\Lambda_c^+ \rightarrow pK^- \pi^+)] / [B(\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-)] = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-) = (4.9 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.70 ±0.27 ±0.15</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 18Q reports $[\Gamma(\Xi_b \rightarrow pK^- \pi^- \times B(b \rightarrow \Xi_b^0)/B(b \rightarrow \Lambda_b^0))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}]/[B(\Lambda_c^+ \rightarrow pK^- \pi^+)] / [B(\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-)] = (5.6 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-3}$ which we multiply by our best values $B(\Lambda_c^+ \rightarrow pK^- \pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow \Lambda_c^+ \pi^-) = (4.9 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.
# Baryon Particle Listings

$$ \Xi_b^0, \Xi_b'(5935)^-, \Xi_b(5945)^0 $$

$$ \Gamma(pK^-K^+K^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^0)/B(b \to \Lambda_b^0))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{12}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.17&plusmn;0.09&plusmn;0.01</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>18Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 18Q reports $[\Gamma(\Xi_b \to pK^-K^+K^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^0)/B(b \to \Lambda_b^0))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)] / [B(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-)] = (0.57 \pm 0.28 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{-3}$ which we multiply by our best values $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-) = (4.9 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

²AAIJ 18Q sees excess with a significance of 2.3σ. Using $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_c^+\pi^-) = (0.430 \pm 0.036) \times 10^{-2}$ and $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.46 \pm 0.24) \times 10^{-2}$ the authors set two sided limit [0.11–0.25] at 90% C.L.

## P AND CP VIOLATION ASYMMETRIES

$$ a_P(\Xi_b^0 \to pK^-K^-\pi^+) $$

Observable calculated as average of the triple products for $\Xi_b^0$ and $\Xi_b'$, which is sensitive to parity violation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-3.04&plusmn;5.19&plusmn;0.36</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18AG LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured over full phase space of the decay.

$$ a_{CP}(\Xi_b^0 \to pK^-K^-\pi^+) $$

Observable calculated as half of the difference between triple products for $\Xi_b^0$ and $\Xi_b'$, which is sensitive to CP violation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-3.58&plusmn;5.19&plusmn;0.36</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18AG LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured over full phase space of the decay.

$$ \Delta A_{CP}(\Xi_b^0 \to pK^-\pi^+\pi^-) $$

$\Delta A_{CP} \equiv A_{CP}(\Xi_b^0 \to pK^-\pi^+\pi^-) - A_{CP}(\Xi_b^0 \to (\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)\pi^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-17&plusmn;11&plusmn;1</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Full phase space.

$$ \Delta A_{CP}(\Xi_b^0 \to pK^-\pi^+K^-) $$

$\Delta A_{CP} \equiv A_{CP}(\Xi_b^0 \to pK^-\pi^+K^-) - A_{CP}(\Xi_b^0 \to (\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)\pi^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-6.8&plusmn;8.0&plusmn;0.8</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Full phase space.

## $\Xi_b^0$ REFERENCES

<table><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20U PRL 124 111802</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AH EPJ C79 745</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AG JHEP 1808 039</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>18Q JHEP 1802 098</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BH PRL 119 181807</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16W JHEP 1605 081</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14H PR D89 032001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14Q JHEP 1404 087</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14Z PRL 113 032001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14B PR D89 072014</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11X PRL 107 102001</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Xi_b'(5935)^- $$

$$ J^P = \frac{1}{2} + \quad \text{Status: } \ast\ast\ast $$

## $\Xi_b'(5935)^-$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5935.1 &plusmn; 0.5</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5935.09 &plusmn; 0.01 &plusmn; 0.49</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5935.08 &plusmn; 0.02 &plusmn; 0.49</td><td>1,3 AAIJ</td><td>15H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$.

²AAIJ 23AU measures $m(\Xi_b'(5935)^-) - m(\Xi_b^0) - m(\pi^-) = 3.66 \pm 0.01 \pm 0.00 \text{ MeV}$. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5791.9 \pm 0.5 \text{ MeV}$, $m(\pi^-) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018 \text{ MeV}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

³AAIJ 15H measures $m(\Xi_b'(5935)^-) - m(\Xi_b^0) - m(\pi^-) = 3.653 \pm 0.018 \pm 0.006 \text{ MeV}$. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5791.9 \pm 0.5 \text{ MeV}$, $m(\pi^-) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018 \text{ MeV}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

## $\Xi_b'(5935)^-$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.03 &plusmn; 0.01 &plusmn; 0.03</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.08</td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$.

## $\Xi_b'(5935)^-$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_f/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1 \Xi_b^0 \pi^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Xi_b'(5935)^-) / B(\bar{b} \to \Xi_b^0)$</td><td>(11.8 &plusmn; 1.8) %</td></tr></tbody></table>

## $\Xi_b'(5935)^-$ BRANCHING RATIOS

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_b^0 \pi^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Xi_b'(5935)^-) / B(\bar{b} \to \Xi_b^0)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_1/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.118 &plusmn; 0.017 &plusmn; 0.007</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$.

## $\Xi_b'(5935)^-$ REFERENCES

<table><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AU PRL 131 171901</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15H PRL 114 062004</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Xi_b(5945)^0 $$

$$ J^P = \frac{3}{2} + \quad \text{Status: } \ast\ast\ast $$

Quantum numbers are based on quark model expectations.

## $\Xi_b(5945)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5952.3 &plusmn; 0.6</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5952.35 &plusmn; 0.02 &plusmn; 0.58</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5952.3 &plusmn; 0.1 &plusmn; 0.6</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>16AE LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5951.4 &plusmn; 0.8 &plusmn; 0.6</td><td>4 CHATRCHYAN 12S</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV, 5.3 fb<sup>-1</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured using $\Xi_b(5945)^0 \to \Xi_b^-\pi^+, \Xi_b^- \to \Xi_c^0\pi^-, \Xi_c^0 \to pK^-K^-\pi^+$ decays.

²AAIJ 23AU measures $m(\Xi_b(5945)^0) - m(\Xi_b^-) - m(\pi^+) = 15.80 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.01 \text{ MeV}$. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^-) = 5797.0 \pm 0.6 \text{ MeV}$, $m(\pi^+) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018 \text{ MeV}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

³AAIJ 16AE measures $m(\Xi_b(5945)^0) - m(\Xi_b^-) - m(\pi^+) = 15.727 \pm 0.068 \pm 0.023 \text{ MeV}$. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^-) = 5797.0 \pm 0.6 \text{ MeV}$, $m(\pi^+) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018 \text{ MeV}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

⁴CHATRCHYAN 12s measures $m(\Xi_b(5945)^0) - m(\Xi_b^-) - m(\pi^+) = 14.84 \pm 0.74 \pm 0.28 \text{ MeV}$. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^-) = 5797.0 \pm 0.6 \text{ MeV}$.

⁵0.6 MeV, $m(\pi^+) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018 \text{ MeV}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

## $\Xi_b(5945)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.87 &plusmn; 0.06 &plusmn; 0.05</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured using $\Xi_b(5945)^0 \to \Xi_b^-\pi^+, \Xi_b^- \to \Xi_c^0\pi^-, \Xi_c^0 \to pK^-K^-\pi^+$ decays.

²Systematic uncertainty not evaluated.

## $\Xi_b(5945)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_f/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1 \Xi_b^- \pi^+$</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

## $\Xi_b(5945)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_b^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_1/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AE ATLS</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 12S</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV, 5.3 fb<sup>-1</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

## $\Xi_b(5945)^0$ REFERENCES

<table><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AU PRL 131 171901</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AE JHEP 1605 161</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHATRCHYAN 12S</td><td>PRL 108 252002</td><td>S. Chatrchyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr></tbody></table>
$\Xi_b(5955)^-$

$J^P = \frac{3}{2}^+$

Status: ***

### $\Xi_b(5955)^-$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5955.7 ± 0.5</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5955.70 ± 0.03 ± 0.49</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5955.4 ± 0.1 ± 0.5</td><td>1,3 AAIJ</td><td>15H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$.

2. AAIJ 23AU measures $m(\Xi_b(5955)^-) - m(\Xi_b^0) - m(\pi^-) = 24.27 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.01$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5791.9 \pm 0.5$ MeV, $m(\pi^-) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

3. AAIJ 15H measures $m(\Xi_b(5955)^-) - m(\Xi_b^0) - m(\pi^-) = 24.96 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.06$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5791.9 \pm 0.5$ MeV, $m(\pi^-) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

### $\Xi_b(5955)^-$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.43 ± 0.08 ± 0.08</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.65 ± 0.31 ± 0.10</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1. Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$.

### $\Xi_b(5955)^-$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_i/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1$</td><td>$(20.7 \pm 3.5)\%$</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>$\Xi_b^*(5955)^- / B(\bar{b} \to \Xi_b^0)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(5955)^-$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>$\Gamma(\Xi_b^0\pi^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Xi_b^*(5955)^-) / B(\bar{b} \to \Xi_b^0)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.207 ± 0.032 ± 0.015</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$.

### $\Xi_b(6087)^0$ REFERENCES

AAIJ 23AU PRL 131 171901

R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

AAIJ 15H PRL 114 062004

R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

$\Xi_b(6087)^0$

$I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{3}{2}^-)$ Status: ***

J, P need confirmation.

### $\Xi_b(6087)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6087.2 ± 0.2 ± 0.5</strong></td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^+\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$. Measured as mass difference, listed separately.

2. AAIJ 23AU measures $m(\Xi_b(6087)^-) - m(\Xi_b^0) - 2m(\pi^+) = 16.20 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.06$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5791.9 \pm 0.5$ MeV, $m(\pi^+) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

### $\Xi_b(6087)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2.43 ± 0.51 ± 0.10</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^+\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$.

### $\Xi_b(6087)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_i/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1$</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6087)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>$\Gamma(\Xi_b^0\pi^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6087)^0$ REFERENCES

AAIJ 23AU PRL 131 171901 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

$\Xi_b(6095)^0$

$I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{3}{2}^-)$ Status: ***

J, P need confirmation.

### $\Xi_b(6095)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6095.3 ± 0.2 ± 0.5</strong></td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^+\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-$ and $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$.

2. AAIJ 23AU measures $m(\Xi_b(6095)^0) - m(\Xi_b^0) - 2m(\pi^+) = 24.32 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.03$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5791.9 \pm 0.5$ MeV, $m(\pi^+) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

### $\Xi_b(6095)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.50 ± 0.33 ± 0.11</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^+\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-$ and $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^+\pi^-\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$.

### $\Xi_b(6095)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_i/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1$</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6095)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>$\Gamma(\Xi_b^0\pi^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6095)^0$ REFERENCES

AAIJ 23AU PRL 131 171901 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

$\Xi_b(6100)^0$

$J^P = \frac{3}{2}^-$ Status: ***

J, P need confirmation.

### $\Xi_b(6100)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6099.8 ± 0.6</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6099.7 ± 0.1 ± 0.6</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6100.3 ± 0.2 ± 0.6</td><td>3,4 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21F CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^+\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^0\pi^-$ and $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^0\pi^-\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^0 \to pK^-K^-\pi^+$.

2. AAIJ 23AU measures $m(\Xi_b(6100)^-) - m(\Xi_b^0) - 2m(\pi^+) = 23.60 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.12$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5797.0 \pm 0.6$ MeV, $m(\pi^+) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

3. Observed in $\Xi_b(6100)^- \to \Xi_b^0\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

4. SIRUNYAN 21F measures $m(\Xi_b(6100)^-) - m(\Xi_b^0) - 2m(\pi^+) = 24.14 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.09$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5797.0 \pm 0.6$ MeV, $m(\pi^+) = 139.57039 \pm 0.00018$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

### $\Xi_b(6100)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.94 ± 0.30 ± 0.06</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AU LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;1.9</td><td>95</td><td>2 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21F CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

1. Observed in $\Xi_b^0\pi^+\pi^-$ channel with $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^0\pi^-$ and $\Xi_b^0 \to \Xi_c^0\pi^-\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^0 \to pK^-K^-\pi^+$.

2. Observed in $\Xi_b(6100)^- \to \Xi_b^0\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.
### $\Xi_b(6100)^-$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Ξ<sup>-</sup><sub>b</sub> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6100)^-$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(Ξ<sup>-</sup><sub>b</sub> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AU</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>60</td><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>21F</td><td>CMS pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6100)^-$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AU</td><td>PRL 131 171901</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>21F</td><td>PRL 126 252003</td><td>A.M. Şirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Xi_b(6227)^- $$

$$ J^P = ?? $$

Status: ***

### $\Xi_b(6227)^-$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6227.9 ± 0.9 ± 0.2</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>6226.9 ± 2.0 ± 0.4</td><td>2,3 AAIJ</td><td>18H</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 2021</td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 21 measures $m(\Xi_b(6227)^-) - m(\Lambda_b^0) = 608.3 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.4$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.60 \pm 0.17$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

² Uses $\Lambda_b^0 K^-$ and $\Xi_b^0 \pi^-$ modes.

³ Measures mass difference $m(\Xi_b(6227)^-) - m(\Lambda_b^0) = 607.3 \pm 2.0 \pm 0.3$ MeV and uses $m(\Lambda_b^0) = 5619.58 \pm 0.17$ MeV.

### $\Xi_b(6227)^-$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>19.9 ± 2.1 ± 1.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>18.1 ± 5.4 ± 1.8</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>18H</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 2021</td></tr></table>

¹ Uses $\Lambda_b^0 K^-$ decays.

² Uses $\Lambda_b^0 K^-$ and $\Xi_b^0 \pi^-$ modes.

### $\Xi_b(6227)^-$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Scale factor</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> K<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub>(6227))/B(b → Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>)</td><td>(3.20 ± 0.35) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> Ξ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> π<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub>(6227))/B(b → Ξ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>)</td><td>(2.8 ± 1.1) %</td><td>1.8</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6227)^-$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> K<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub>(6227))/B(b → Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>))/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.20 ± 0.35 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.0 ± 0.3 ± 0.4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18H</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.4 ± 0.3 ± 0.4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18H</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(Ξ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> π<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub>(6227))/B(b → Ξ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>))/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>28 ± 11 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.8.</td></tr><tr><td>47 ± 10 ± 7</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18H</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>22 ± 6 ± 3</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18H</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6227)^-$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21</td><td>PR D103 012004</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>18H</td><td>PRL 121 072002</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Xi_b(6227)^0 $$

$$ J^P = ?? $$

Status: ***

### $\Xi_b(6227)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6226.8<sup>+1.4</sup><sub>-1.5</sub> ± 0.6</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>21</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 21 measures $m(\Xi_b(6227)^0) - m(\Xi_b^-) = 429.8^{+1.4}_{-1.5} \pm 0.3$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $m(\Xi_b^-) = 5797.0 \pm 0.6$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

² Uses $\Xi_b^- \pi^+$ decays.

### $\Xi_b(6227)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>18.6<sup>+5.0</sup><sub>-4.1</sub> ± 1.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $\Xi_b^- \pi^+$ decays.

### $\Xi_b(6227)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Ξ<sup>-</sup><sub>b</sub> π<sup>+</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub>(6227)<sup>0</sup>)/B(b → Ξ<sup>-</sup><sub>b</sub>)</td><td>(4.5 ± 0.9) %</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6227)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(Ξ<sup>-</sup><sub>b</sub> π<sup>+</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>b</sub>(6227)<sup>0</sup>)/B(b → Ξ<sup>-</sup><sub>b</sub>))/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.5 ± 0.8 ± 0.4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6227)^0$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21</td><td>PR D103 012004</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Xi_b(6327)^0 $$

$$ J^P = ?? $$

Status: ***

### $\Xi_b(6327)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6327.28<sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.21</sub> ± 0.27</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22l</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6327)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><2.56</td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22l</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6327)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6327)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(Λ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22l</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Xi_b(6327)^0$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>22l</td><td>PRL 128 162001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></table>
$\Xi_b(6333)^0$

$J^P = ?$ Status: ***

$\Xi_b(6333)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6332.69<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.18</sub> ±0.22</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22i</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Xi_b(6333)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><1.92</td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22i</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Xi_b(6333)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>i</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Λ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Xi_b(6333)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(Λ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22i</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Xi_b(6333)^0$ REFERENCES

AAIJ 22i PRL 128 162001 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

$\Xi_b^0$

$J^P = \frac{1}{2}+$

OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE

$\Xi_{bc}^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>i</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Confidence level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> D<sup>0</sup> pK<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>bc</sub><sup>0</sup>)/B(b → Λ<sub>b</sub>)</td><td>&lt;1.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>95%</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Xi_{bc}^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>0</sup> pK<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ξ<sub>bc</sub><sup>0</sup>)/B(b → Λ<sub>b</sub>))/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>20AM LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20AM reports upper limits for $\Gamma(\Xi_b^0 \to D^0 pK^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^0)/B(b \to \Lambda_b)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} / [B(\Lambda_b^0 \to pD^0 K^-)] < 3.0 \times 10^{-1} - 1.7 \times 10^{-2}$ for the considered $\Xi_b^0$ mass and lifetime hypotheses ranging from 6.7 to 7.2 GeV and from 100 to 500 fs. We use the 3.0 × 10<sup>-1</sup> limit for the quoted result.

²AAIJ 20AM reports $[\Gamma(\Xi_b^0 \to D^0 pK^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^0)/B(b \to \Lambda_b))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} / [B(\Lambda_b^0 \to pD^0 K^-)] < 3.0 \times 10^{-1}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to pD^0 K^-) = 4.5 \times 10^{-5}$.

$\Xi_{bc}^0$ REFERENCES

AAIJ 20AM JHEP 2011 095 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

$\Omega_b^-$

$I(J^P) = 0(\frac{1}{2}+)$ Status: ***

I, J, P need confirmation.

In the quark model $\Omega_b^-$ is ssb ground state. None of its quantum numbers has been measured.

$\Omega_b^-$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6045.8 ± 0.8</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6045.7 ± 0.5 ± 0.6</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23BD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6047.5 ± 3.8 ± 0.6</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>14B CDF</td><td>pP at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>6045.9 ± 0.5 ± 0.6</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>23BD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6044.30 ± 1.20 ± 1.12</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>21AC LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 23BD</td></tr><tr><td>6045.1 ± 3.2 ± 0.8</td><td>5 AAIJ</td><td>16O LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 23BD</td></tr><tr><td>6046.0 ± 2.2 ± 0.5</td><td>6 AAIJ</td><td>13AW LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 23BD</td></tr><tr><td>6054.4 ± 6.8 ± 0.9</td><td>7 AALTONEN</td><td>09AP CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 14B</td></tr><tr><td>6165 ± 10 ± 13</td><td>8 ABAZOV</td><td>08AL D0</td><td>pP at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Combines measurement using $\Omega_b^-$ → $J/\psi\Omega^-$ decays with results from AAIJ 160 and AAIJ 21AC taking into account correlations amongst systematic uncertainties. Uses $\Xi_b^-$ mass 5797.33 ± 0.24 ± 029 MeV from AAIJ 21.

²Uses $\Omega_b^-$ → $J/\psi\Omega^-$ and $\Omega_c^0\pi^-$ decays, with the first evidence for $\Omega_b^-$ → $\Omega_c^0\pi^-$ at 3.3 $\sigma$ significance.

³Uses $\Omega_b^-$ → $J/\psi\Omega^-$ decays.

⁴Uses $\Omega_b^-$ → $\Xi_c^+K^-\pi^-$ and $\Xi_c^+K^-\pi^+$ decays. Reports the value of 6044.3 ± 1.2 ± 1.1<sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.22</sub> MeV where the last uncertainty is due to the mass of $\Xi_c^+$. We have combined the two systematic uncertainties in quadrature.

⁵Reconstructed in $\Omega_b^-$ → $\Omega_c^0\pi^-$, $\Omega_c^0K^-\pi^+$ decays. Reference $\Xi_b^-$ mass 5797.72 ± 0.6 MeV from AAIJ 14B.

⁶Measured in $\Omega_b^-$ → $J/\psi\Omega^-$ with 19 ± 5 events.

⁷Observed in $\Omega_b^-$ → $J/\psi\Omega^-$ decays with 16<sup>+6</sup><sub>-4</sub> candidates, a significance of 5.5 sigma from a combined mass-lifetime fit.

⁸Observed in $\Omega_b^-$ → $J/\psi\Omega^-$ decays with 17.8 ± 4.9 ± 0.8 candidates, a significance of 5.4 sigma.

$m_{\Omega_b^-} - m_{\Lambda_b^0}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>426.4 ± 2.2 ± 0.4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AV LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$m_{\Omega_b^-} - m_{\Xi_b^-}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>248.50 ± 0.51 ± 0.37</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23BD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

248.54 ± 0.51 ± 0.38 2 AAIJ 23BD LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

247.3 ± 3.2 ± 0.5 3 AAIJ 16O LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 23BD

¹Uses $\Omega_b^-$ → $J/\psi\Omega^-$ decays combined with the result from AAIJ 160 obtained using $\Omega_b^-$ → $\Omega_c^0\pi^-$, $\Omega_c^0K^-\pi^+$ and $\Xi_b^-$ → $\Xi_c^0\pi^-$, $\Xi_c^0K^-\pi^+$ decays taking into account correlation of systematic uncertainties.

²Uses $\Omega_b^-$ → $J/\psi\Omega^-$ decays.

³Uses $\Omega_b^-$ → $\Omega_c^0\pi^-$, $\Omega_c^0K^-\pi^+$ and $\Xi_b^-$ → $\Xi_c^0\pi^-$, $\Xi_c^0K^-\pi^+$ decays.

$\Omega_b$ MEAN LIFE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.64<sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.17</sub> OUR EVALUATION</td><td></td><td></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1.65<sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.16</sub> OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.78 ± 0.26 ± 0.05 ± 0.06</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16O LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.54<sup>+0.26</sup><sub>-0.21</sub> ± 0.05</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>14T LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.66<sup>+0.53</sup><sub>-0.40</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>14B CDF</td><td>pP at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.13<sup>+0.53</sup><sub>-0.40</sub> ± 0.02 3 AALTONEN 09AP CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 14B

¹Measured in $\Omega_b^-$ → $\Omega_c^0\pi^-$, $\Omega_c^0K^-\pi^+$ decays relative to $\Xi_b^-$ → $\Xi_c^0\pi^-$, $\Xi_c^0K^-\pi^+$ decays with reference $\Xi_b^-$ mean life 1.599 ± 0.06 ps from AAIJ 14B.

²Measured in $\Omega_b^-$ → $J/\psi\Omega^-$ decays.

³Observed in $\Omega_b^-$ → $J/\psi\Omega^-$ decays with 16<sup>+6</sup><sub>-4</sub> candidates, a significance of 5.5 sigma from a combined mass-lifetime fit.

$\tau(\Omega_b^-) / \tau(\Xi_b^-)$ mean life ratio

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.11<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.03</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16O LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $\Omega_b^-$ → $\Omega_c^0\pi^-$, $\Omega_c^0K^-\pi^+$ and $\Xi_b^-$ → $\Xi_c^0\pi^-$, $\Xi_c^0K^-\pi^+$ decays.

$\Omega_b^-$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>i</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Scale factor/<br>Confidence level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> J/ψΩ<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ω<sub>b</sub>)</td><td>(1.4<sup>+0.5</sup><sub>-0.4</sub> × 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>S=1.6</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> pK<sup>-</sup> K<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ω<sub>b</sub>)</td><td>&lt; 2.3</td><td>× 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub> pπ<sup>-</sup> π<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ω<sub>b</sub>)</td><td>&lt; 1.5</td><td>× 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub> pK<sup>-</sup> π<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ω<sub>b</sub>)</td><td>&lt; 7</td><td>× 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>5</sub> Ω<sub>c</sub><sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>seen</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>6</sub> Ω<sub>c</sub><sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup>, Ω<sub>c</sub><sup>0</sup> → pK<sup>-</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>7</sub> Ξ<sub>c</sub><sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>seen</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Omega_b^-$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψΩ<sup>-</sup> × B(b → Ω<sub>b</sub>))/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1.4 <sup>+0.5</sup><sub>-0.4</sub> OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6.

1.22 ± 0.12 <sup>+0.31</sup><sub>-0.26</sub> 1,2 AAIJ 23BD LHCB pp at 13 TeV
Baryon Particle Listings

$$ \Omega_b^-, \Omega_b(6316)^-, \Omega_b(6330)^-, \Omega_b(6340)^- $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} 2.6 \quad \pm 1.0 \\ \phantom{2.6} \pm 0.7 \end{array} \pm 0.4 $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} 3 \text{ AALTONEN} \quad 09\text{AP} \quad \text{CDF} \quad \text{p}\bar{p} \text{ at } 1.96 \text{ TeV} \\ 4 \text{ ABAZOV} \quad 08\text{AL} \quad \text{D0} \quad \text{p}\bar{p} \text{ at } 1.96 \text{ TeV} \end{array} $$

¹AAIJ 23BD reports $[\Gamma(\Omega_b^- \to J/\psi\Omega^- \times B(b \to \Omega_b)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(\Xi_b^- \to J/\psi\Xi^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-))] = 0.120 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.008$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Xi_b^- \to J/\psi\Xi^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-)) = (1.02^{+0.26}_{-0.21}) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Reconstructing beauty baryons in the kinematic region $2 < \eta < 6$ and $p_T < 20$ GeV/c with their decays to a $J/\psi$ meson and a hyperon.

³AALTONEN 09AP reports $[\Gamma(\Omega_b^- \to J/\psi\Omega^- \times B(b \to \Omega_b)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\Lambda \times B(b \to \Lambda_b^0))] = (0.045^{+0.017}_{-0.012} \pm 0.004$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\Lambda \times B(b \to \Lambda_b^0)) = (5.8 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ABAZOV 08AL reports $[\Gamma(\Omega_b^- \to J/\psi\Omega^- \times B(b \to \Omega_b)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(\Xi_b^- \to J/\psi\Xi^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-))] = 0.80 \pm 0.32^{+0.14}_{-0.22}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Xi_b^- \to J/\psi\Xi^- \times B(b \to \Xi_b^-)) = (1.02^{+0.26}_{-0.21}) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(pK^- K^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Omega_b)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_2 / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.3 &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ \begin{array}{l} <2.5 \times 10^{-4} \quad 90 \quad 2 \text{AAIJ} \quad 17\text{F} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} \end{array} $$

¹AAIJ 21AH reports $[\Gamma(\Omega_b^- \to pK^- K^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Omega_b)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(\Xi_b^- \to pK^- K^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Xi_b^-))] < 62 \times 10^{-3}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\Xi_b^- \to pK^- K^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Xi_b^-)) = 3.7 \times 10^{-8}$.

²AAIJ 17F reports $[\Gamma(\Omega_b^- \to pK^- K^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Omega_b)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to K^+ K^- K^+)] / [B(\bar{b} \to B^+)] < 18 \times 10^{-5}$ which we multiply by our best values $B(B^+ \to K^+ K^- K^+) = 3.40 \times 10^{-5}$, $B(\bar{b} \to B^+) = 40.8 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(p\pi^- \pi^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Omega_b)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_3 / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.5 &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 17F reports $[\Gamma(\Omega_b^- \to pK^- \pi^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Omega_b)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to K^+ K^- K^+)] / [B(\bar{b} \to B^+)] < 109 \times 10^{-5}$ which we multiply by our best values $B(B^+ \to K^+ K^- K^+) = 3.40 \times 10^{-5}$, $B(\bar{b} \to B^+) = 40.8 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(pK^- \pi^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Omega_b)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_4 / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7 &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 17F reports $[\Gamma(\Omega_b^- \to pK^- \pi^- \times B(\bar{b} \to \Omega_b)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to K^+ K^- K^+)] / [B(\bar{b} \to B^+)] < 51 \times 10^{-5}$ which we multiply by our best values $B(B^+ \to K^+ K^- K^+) = 3.40 \times 10^{-5}$, $B(\bar{b} \to B^+) = 40.8 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(\Omega_c^0 \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_5 / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>160</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_c^+ K^- \pi^-) / \Gamma(\Omega_c^0 \pi^-, \Omega_c^0 \to pK^- K^- \pi^+) $$

$$ \Gamma_7 / \Gamma_6 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.2 ± 0.2 ± 1.0</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 21AC reports $[\Gamma(\Omega_b^- \to \Xi_c^+ K^- \pi^-) / \Gamma(\Omega_b^- \to \Omega_c^0 \pi^-, \Omega_c^0 \to pK^- K^- \pi^+)] \times [B(\Xi_c^- \to pK^- \pi^+)] = (1.35 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.05)$ which we divide by our best value $B(\Xi_c^- \to pK^- \pi^+) = (6.2 \pm 3.0) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

### Ω_b^− REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23BD PR D108 052008</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21 PR D103 012004</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21AC PR D104 L091102</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21AH PR D104 052010</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17F PRL 118 071801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16O PR D93 092007</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14B PL B728 234</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14T PL B736 154</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14B PR D89 072014</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AV PRL 110 182001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>09AP PR D80 072003</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>08AL PRL 101 232002</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Omega_b(6316)^- $$

$$ I(J^P) = ?(??) \quad \text{Status:} \quad \text{***} $$

### Ω_b(6316)^− MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6315.6 ± 0.3 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20T LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20T measures $m(\Omega_b(6316)^-) - m(\Xi_b^0) = 523.74 \pm 0.31 \pm 0.07$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5791.9 \pm 0.5$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

### Ω_b(6316)^− WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.2</td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20T LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Ω_b(6316)^− DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>f</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Ω_b(6316)^− BRANCHING RATIOS

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_b^0 K^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_1 / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20T LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20T establishes the decay at $2.1 \sigma$ significance level.

### Ω_b(6316)^− REFERENCES

AAIJ 20T PRL 124 080202 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

$$ \Omega_b(6330)^- $$

$$ I(J^P) = ?(??) \quad \text{Status:} \quad \text{***} $$

### Ω_b(6330)^− MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6330.3 ± 0.3 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20T LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20T measures $m(\Omega_b(6330)^-) - m(\Xi_b^0) = 538.40 \pm 0.28 \pm 0.07$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5791.9 \pm 0.5$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

### Ω_b(6330)^− WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.7</td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20T LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Ω_b(6330)^− DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>f</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Ω_b(6330)^− BRANCHING RATIOS

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_b^0 K^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_1 / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20T LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20T establishes the decay at $2.6 \sigma$ significance level.

### Ω_b(6330)^− REFERENCES

AAIJ 20T PRL 124 080202 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

$$ \Omega_b(6340)^- $$

$$ I(J^P) = ?(??) \quad \text{Status:} \quad \text{***} $$

### Ω_b(6340)^− MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6339.7 ± 0.3 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20T LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20T measures $m(\Omega_b(6340)^-) - m(\Xi_b^0) = 547.81 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.05$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5791.9 \pm 0.5$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

### Ω_b(6340)^− WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.8</td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20T LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Ω_b(6340)^− DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>f</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Ξ<sub>b</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>
## $\Omega_b(6340)^-$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(Ξ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>K<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>1</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

## $\Omega_b(6340)^-$ REFERENCES

AAIJ 20T PRL 124 082002 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

$$ \Omega_b(6350)^- $$

$I(J^P) = ?(??)$ Status: ***
$I, J, P$ need confirmation.

## $\Omega_b(6350)^-$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6349.8 ± 0.4 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 20T measures $m(\Omega_b(6350)^-) - m(\Xi_b^0) = 557.98 \pm 0.35 \pm 0.05$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $m(\Xi_b^0) = 5791.9 \pm 0.5$ MeV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

## $\Omega_b(6350)^-$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;3.2</b></td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

## $\Omega_b(6350)^-$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>i</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Ξ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>K<sup>-</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

## $\Omega_b(6350)^-$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(Ξ<sup>0</sup><sub>b</sub>K<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>1</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

## $\Omega_b(6350)^-$ REFERENCES

AAIJ 20T PRL 124 082002 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

$$ \textbf{b-baryon ADMIXTURE} (\Lambda_b, \Xi_b, \Omega_b) $$

## b-baryon ADMIXTURE MEAN LIFE

Each measurement of the b-baryon mean life is an average over an admixture of various baryons which decay weakly. Different techniques emphasize different admixtures of produced particles, which could result in a different b-baryon mean life. More b-baryon flavor specific channels are not included in the measurement.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.218<sup>+0.130</sup><sub>-0.115</sub> ± 0.042</td><td>1 ABAZOV</td><td>07S</td><td>D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 12U</td></tr><tr><td>1.22<sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.18</sub> ± 0.04</td><td>1 ABAZOV</td><td>05C</td><td>D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 07S</td></tr><tr><td>1.16 ± 0.20 ± 0.08</td><td>2 ABREU</td><td>99W</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.19 ± 0.14 ± 0.07</td><td>3 ABREU</td><td>99W</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.14 ± 0.08 ± 0.04</td><td>4 ABREU</td><td>99W</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.11<sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.18</sub> ± 0.05</td><td>5 ABREU</td><td>99W</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.29<sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.22</sub> ± 0.06</td><td>5 ACKERSTAFF</td><td>98G</td><td>OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.20 ± 0.08 ± 0.06</td><td>6 BARATE</td><td>98D</td><td>ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.21 ± 0.11</td><td>5 BARATE</td><td>98D</td><td>ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.32 ± 0.15 ± 0.07</td><td>7 ABE</td><td>96M</td><td>CDF</td><td>pT at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.46<sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.21</sub> ± 0.07</td><td>ABREU</td><td>96D</td><td>DLPH</td><td>Repl. by ABREU 99W</td></tr><tr><td>1.10<sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.17</sub> ± 0.09</td><td>5 ABREU</td><td>96D</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.16 ± 0.11 ± 0.06</td><td>5 AKERS</td><td>96</td><td>OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.27<sup>+0.35</sup><sub>-0.29</sub> ± 0.09</td><td>ABREU</td><td>95S</td><td>DLPH</td><td>Repl. by ABREU 99W</td></tr><tr><td>1.05<sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.11</sub> ± 0.09</td><td>290</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>95L</td><td>Repl. by BARATE 98D</td></tr><tr><td>1.04<sup>+0.48</sup><sub>-0.38</sub> ± 0.10</td><td>11</td><td>8 ABREU</td><td>93F</td><td>DLPH</td><td>Excess Λμ<sup>-</sup>, decay lengths</td></tr><tr><td>1.05<sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.20</sub> ± 0.08</td><td>157</td><td>9 AKERS</td><td>93</td><td>OPAL</td><td>Excess Λℓ<sup>-</sup>, decay lengths</td></tr><tr><td>1.12<sup>+0.32</sup><sub>-0.29</sub> ± 0.16</td><td>101</td><td>10 BUSKULIC</td><td>92I</td><td>ALEP</td><td>Excess Λℓ<sup>-</sup>, impact parameters</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured mean life using fully reconstructed $\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi \Lambda$ decays.

2 Measured using $\Lambda\ell^-\ell^-\ell^-\ell^-$ decay length.

3 Measured using $p\ell^-\ell^-$ decay length.

4 This ABREU 99w result is the combined result of the $\Lambda\ell^-, p\ell^-, \text{and excess } \Lambda\mu^-$ impact parameter measurements.

5 Measured using $\Lambda_C^\ell$ and $\Lambda^\ell\ell^-$.

6 Measured using the excess of $\Lambda\ell^-, \text{lepton impact parameter}$.

7 Measured using $\Lambda_C^\ell$.

8 ABREU 93F superseded by ABREU 96D.

9 AKERS 93 superseded by AKERS 96.

10 BUSKULIC 92I superseded by BUSKULIC 95L.

## b-baryon ADMIXTURE DECAY MODES

### $(\Lambda_b, \Xi_b, \Omega_b)$

These branching fractions are actually an average over weakly decaying b-baryons weighted by their production rates at the LHC, LEP, and Tevatron, branching ratios, and detection efficiencies. They scale with the b-baryon production fraction $B(b \to b\text{-baryon})$.

The branching fractions $B(b\text{-baryon} \to \Lambda\ell^-\ell^-\ell^-\ell^-\text{anything})$ and $B(\Lambda_b^0 \to \Lambda_C^\ell\ell^-\ell^-\ell^-\ell^-\text{anything})$ are not pure measurements because the underlying measured products of these with $B(b \to b\text{-baryon})$ were used to determine $B(b \to b\text{-baryon})$, as described in the note "Production and Decay of b-Flavored Hadrons."

For inclusive branching fractions, e.g., $B \to D^\pm\text{anything}$, the values usually are multiplicities, not branching fractions. They can be greater than one.

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>i</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Scale factor</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> pμ<sup>-</sup>ν anything</td><td>(5.8<sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-2.0</sub> %)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> pℓν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>(5.6 ± 1.2) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub> p anything</td><td>(70 ± 22 %)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub> Λℓ<sup>-</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>(3.8 ± 0.6) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>5</sub> Λℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>(3.2 ± 0.8) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>6</sub> Λ anything</td><td>(39 ± 7 %)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>7</sub> Ξ<sup>-</sup>ℓ<sup>-</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>(4.6 ± 1.4) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>1.2</td></tr></tbody></table>

## b-baryon ADMIXTURE $(\Lambda_b, \Xi_b, \Omega_b)$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(ρμ<sup>-</sup>ν anything)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>1</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.8<sup>+2.2</sup><sub>-1.9</sub> ± 0.8</td><td>125</td><td>1 ABREU</td><td>95S</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 ABREU 95S reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \to p\mu^-\nu anything)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon})] = 0.0049 \pm 0.0011^{+0.0015}_{-0.0011}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(ρℓν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>2</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.6<sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-0.7</sub></td><td>1 BARATE</td><td>98V</td><td>ALEP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 BARATE 98V reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \to p\ell\nu<sub>\ell</sub> anything)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon})] = (4.72 \pm 0.66 \pm 0.44) \times 10^{-3}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(ρℓν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything)/Γ(ρ anything)</th><th>Γ<sub>2</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.0<sup>+1.2</sup><sub>-1.4</sub></td><td>BARATE</td><td>98V</td><td>ALEP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(Λℓ<sup>-</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>4</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.8<sup>+0.6</sup> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.9 ± 0.5 ± 0.5</td><td>1 BARATE</td><td>98D</td><td>ALEP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.5 ± 0.4 ± 0.5</td><td>2 AKERS</td><td>96</td><td>OPAL</td><td>Excess of Λℓ<sup>-</sup> over Λℓ<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3.6 ± 0.9 ± 0.5</td><td>3 ABREU</td><td>95S</td><td>DLPH</td><td>Excess of Λℓ<sup>-</sup> over Λℓ<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>7.3 ± 1.4 ± 1.0</td><td>4 BUSKULIC</td><td>95L</td><td>ALEP</td><td>Excess of Λℓ<sup>-</sup> over Λℓ<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

The values and averages in this section serve only to show what values result if one assumes our $B(b \to b\text{-baryon})$. They cannot be thought of as measurements since the underlying product branching ratios were also used to determine $B(b \to b\text{-baryon})$ as described in the note on "Production and Decay of b-Flavored Hadrons."

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.9 ± 0.5 ± 0.5</td><td>1 BARATE</td><td>98D</td><td>ALEP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.5 ± 0.4 ± 0.5</td><td>2 AKERS</td><td>96</td><td>OPAL</td><td>Excess of Λℓ<sup>-</sup> over Λℓ<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3.6 ± 0.9 ± 0.5</td><td>3 ABREU</td><td>95S</td><td>DLPH</td><td>Excess of Λℓ<sup>-</sup> over Λℓ<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>7.3 ± 1.4 ± 1.0</td><td>4 BUSKULIC</td><td>95L</td><td>ALEP</td><td>Excess of Λℓ<sup>-</sup> over Λℓ<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>157</td><td>5 AKERS</td><td>93</td><td>OPAL</td><td>Excess of Λℓ<sup>-</sup> over Λℓ<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>8.3 ± 2.5 ± 1.1</td><td>101</td><td>6 BUSKULIC</td><td>92I</td><td>ALEP</td><td>Excess of Λℓ<sup>-</sup> over Λℓ<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 BARATE 98d reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \to \Lambda\ell^-\nu\ell^-\ell^-\ell^-\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon})] = 0.00326 \pm 0.00016 \pm 0.00039$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Measured using the excess of $\Lambda\ell^-, \text{lepton impact parameter}$.

2 AKERS 96 reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \to \Lambda\ell^-\nu\ell^-\ell^-\ell^-\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon})] = 0.00291 \pm 0.00023 \pm 0.00025$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon}) = 0.00291 \pm 0.00023 \pm 0.00025$.
# Baryon Particle Listings

## b-baryon ADMIXTURE ($\Lambda_b, \Xi_b, \Omega_b$)

(8.4 ± 1.1) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ABREU 95s reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \rightarrow \Lambda\ell^-\bar{\nu}_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon})] = 0.0030 \pm 0.0006 \pm 0.0004$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴BUSKULIC 95L reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \rightarrow \Lambda\ell^-\bar{\nu}_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon})] = 0.0061 \pm 0.0006 \pm 0.0010$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵AKERS 93 superseded by AKERS 96.

⁶BUSKULIC 92i reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \rightarrow \Lambda\ell^-\bar{\nu}_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon})] = 0.0070 \pm 0.0010 \pm 0.0018$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Superseded by BUSKULIC 95L.

### $\Gamma(\Lambda\ell^+\nu_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma(\Lambda\text{anything})$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

6.0±1.2±0.8

7.0±1.2±0.7

DOCUMENT ID

ABBIENDI

ACKERSTAFF

TECN

OPAL

97N

COMMENT

$e^+e^- \rightarrow Z$

Repl. by ABBIENDI 99L

### $\Gamma_5/\Gamma_6$

### $\Gamma(\Lambda\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (%)

39±7 OUR AVERAGE

42±6±5

27+15/9±3

47±7±6

1 ABBIENDI

2 ABREU

3 ACKERSTAFF

TECN

OPAL

99L

95C

COMMENT

$e^+e^- \rightarrow Z$

$e^+e^- \rightarrow Z$

$e^+e^- \rightarrow Z$

Repl. by ABBIENDI 99L

### $\Gamma_6/\Gamma$

¹ABBIENDI 99L reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \rightarrow \Lambda\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon})] = 0.035 \pm 0.0032 \pm 0.0035$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²ABREU 95C reports $0.28^{+0.17}_{-0.12}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \rightarrow \Lambda\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon})]$ assuming $B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = 0.08 \pm 0.02$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ACKERSTAFF 97N reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \rightarrow \Lambda\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon})] = 0.0393 \pm 0.0046 \pm 0.0037$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

### $\Gamma(\Xi^-\ell^-\bar{\nu}_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

4.6±1.4 OUR AVERAGE

3.6±1.2±0.5

6.4±1.6±0.8

DOCUMENT ID
Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

1 ABDALLAH

2 BUSKULIC

TECN
05C DLPH

COMMENT
$e^+e^- \rightarrow Z^0$

96T ALEP

Excess $\Xi^-\ell^- \rightarrow \Xi^-\ell^+$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

7.0±2.8±0.9

3 ABREU

95V DLPH Repl. by ABDALLAH 05C

¹ABDALLAH 05C reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \rightarrow \Xi^-\ell^-\bar{\nu}_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon})] = (3.0 \pm 1.0 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-4}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²BUSKULIC 96T reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \rightarrow \Xi^-\ell^-\bar{\nu}_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon})] = (5.4 \pm 1.1 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-4}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ABREU 95V reports $[\Gamma(b\text{-baryon} \rightarrow \Xi^-\ell^-\bar{\nu}_\ell\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon})] = (5.9 \pm 2.1 \pm 1.0) \times 10^{-4}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = (8.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

## b-baryon ADMIXTURE ($\Lambda_b, \Xi_b, \Omega_b$) REFERENCES

ABAZOV

07S PRL 99 142001

ABAZOV

ABDIANDI

ABREU

ACKERSTAFF

BARATE

BARATE

ACKERSTAFF

ABE

ABREU

AKERS

BUSKULIC

BUSKULIC

AKERS

BUSKULIC

12U PR D85 112003

07S PRL 94 102001

05C PRL 94 102001

05C EPJ C44 299

99L EPJ C9 1

99W EPJ C10 185

98G PL B426 161

98D EPJ C2 197

98V EPJ C5 205

97N ZPHY C74 423

96M PRL 77 1439

96D ZPHY C71 199

96 ZPHY C69 195

96T PL B384 449

95C PL B347 447

95S ZPHY C68 375

95V ZPHY C68 541

95L PL B357 685

93F PL B311 379

93 PL B316 435

V.M. Abazov et al.

V.M. Abazov et al.

V.M. Abazov et al.

J. Abdallah et al.

G. Abbiendi et al.

P. Abreu et al.

K. Ackerstaff et al.

R. Barate et al.

R. Barate et al.

K. Ackerstaff et al.

F. Abe et al.

P. Abreu et al.

R. Akers et al.

D. Buskullic et al.

P. Abreu et al.

R. Akers et al.

D. Buskullic et al.

(D0 Collab.)

(D0 Collab.)

(D0 Collab.)

(DELPHI Collab.)

(OPAL Collab.)

(DELPHI Collab.)

(OPAL Collab.)

(OPAL Collab.)

(DELPHI Collab.)

(DELPHI Collab.)

(DELPHI Collab.)

(ALEPH Collab.)

(DELPHI Collab.)

(DELPHI Collab.)

(DELPHI Collab.)

(OPAL Collab.)

(ALEPH Collab.)