# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ρ<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.160±0.021</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.150±0.019±0.011</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23V</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.44 ±0.10 <sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.14</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.30 ±0.11 <sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.04</sub></td><td>GARMASH</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.32 ±0.13 <sup>+0.10</sup><sub>-0.08</sub></td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05N</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AI</td></tr></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.07±0.05±0.04</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>*</sup><sub>0</sub>(1430)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.061±0.032</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.14 ±0.10 <sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.06</sub></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.032±0.035 <sup>+0.034</sup><sub>-0.028</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.076±0.038 <sup>+0.028</sup><sub>-0.022</sub></td><td>GARMASH</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.064±0.032 <sup>+0.023</sup><sub>-0.026</sub></td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05N</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AI</td></tr></table>

¹ Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>*</sup><sub>0</sub>(1430)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.26±0.12 <sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.08</sub></strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>*</sup><sub>2</sub>(1430)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.05±0.23 <sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.08</sub></strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.06±0.06±0.04</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>LEES</td><td>11I</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.03±0.15</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.21±0.19 <sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.20</sub></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.12±0.17±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07Z</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.07±0.07±0.04</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06U</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ρ<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.31±0.13±0.03</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11D</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.20 <sup>+0.32</sup><sub>-0.29</sub> ±0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03V</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11D</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup> f<sub>0</sub>(980))

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.15±0.12±0.03</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11D</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.34±0.21±0.03</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06G</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11D</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → a<sup>+</sup><sub>1</sub>K<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>+0.12±0.11±0.02</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08F</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → b<sup>+</sup><sub>1</sub>K<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.03±0.15±0.02</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AG</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>ρ<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.01±0.16±0.02</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → b<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.46±0.20±0.02</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.04±0.14</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.014±0.168±0.002</td><td>DUH</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.10 ±0.26 ±0.03</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.13 <sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.24</sub> ±0.02</td><td>LIN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr><tr><td>0.15 ±0.33 ±0.03</td><td>2 AUBERT,BE</td><td>05E</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,BE 06C</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.31 < A_{CP} < 0.54$.

² Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.43 < A_{CP} < 0.68$.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.21±0.14±0.01</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13BS</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.025±0.031</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.016±0.039±0.009</td><td>KALIYAR</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.04 <sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.05</sub> ±0.02</td><td>LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.04 ±0.11 ±0.02</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04V</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 120</td></tr></table>

¹ Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.23 < A_{CP} < 0.15$.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.115±0.008</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.114±0.007±0.004</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23U</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.170±0.073±0.017</td><td>2 HSU</td><td>17</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.123±0.017±0.014</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BO</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.00 ±0.10 ±0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BB</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.141±0.040±0.019</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>14</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14BO</td></tr></table>

¹ The second error includes both systematics and the uncertainties from CP asymmetries in restricted regions of phase space.

² HSU 17 provides also measurement as a function of K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> invariant mass.

³ AAIJ 14 reports A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>) = -0.648 ± 0.070 ± 0.013 ± 0.007 in the Dalitz plot region of m<sup>2</sup><sub>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></sub> < 1.5 GeV<sup>2</sup>/c<sup>4</sup>. The third uncertainty is due to the CP asymmetry of the B<sup>±</sup> → J/ψK<sup>±</sup> reference mode uncertainty.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> nonresonant)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.107±0.053±0.035</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AL</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses amplitude analysis of B<sup>±</sup> → π<sup>±</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>, m<sup>2</sup><sub>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></sub> < 1.1 GeV<sup>2</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.170±0.073±0.017</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 HSU</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Investigated the angular distribution of K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> pairs with invariant mass below 1.1 GeV/c<sup>2</sup>, which exhibits both a strong enhancement in signal and very large direct CP violation.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>R<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.04±0.05</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.007±0.054±0.032</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23V</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.123±0.087±0.045</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AL</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses amplitude analysis of B<sup>±</sup> → π<sup>±</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>R<sup>*</sup><sub>0</sub>(1430)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.104±0.149±0.088</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AL</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses amplitude analysis of B<sup>±</sup> → π<sup>±</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → φπ<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.098±0.436±0.266</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AL</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses amplitude analysis of B<sup>±</sup> → π<sup>±</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>(K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)<sub>S-wave</sub>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.664±0.038±0.019</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AL</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses amplitude analysis of B<sup>±</sup> → π<sup>±</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> decays in the ππ - KK rescattering mass region of 0.95 < m(K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>) < 1.42 GeV/c<sup>2</sup>.
$A_{CP}(B^+ \to K^+ K^- K^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>-0.036±0.004 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>-0.037±0.002±0.004</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23U LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.036±0.004±0.007</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14B0 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.017<sup>+0.019</sup><sub>-0.014</sub>±0.014</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>120 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.043±0.009±0.008</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AZ LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14B0</td></tr><tr><td>-0.017±0.026±0.015</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>060 BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 120</td></tr><tr><td>0.02±0.07±0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03M BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 060</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The second error includes both systematics and the uncertainties from CP asymmetries in restricted regions of phase space.

²All intermediate charmonium and charm resonances are removed, except of $\chi_{c0}$.

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \phi K^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>0.017±0.017 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">Error includes scale factor of 1.8. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>0.004±0.014±0.007</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23V LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.017±0.011±0.006</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>150 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.128±0.044±0.013</td><td>LEES</td><td>120 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.07±0.17<sup>+0.03</sup><sub>-0.02</sub></td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>05J CDF</td><td>pP&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.01±0.12±0.05</td><td>2 CHEN</td><td>03B BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.022±0.021±0.009</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14A LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 150</td></tr><tr><td>0.00±0.08±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>060 BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 120</td></tr><tr><td>0.04±0.09±0.01</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>04A BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 060</td></tr><tr><td>-0.05±0.20±0.03</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>02E BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtained using $A_{CP}(B^\pm \to J/\psi K^\pm) = (0.3 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-2}$.

²Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.20 < A_{CP} < 0.22$.

³Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.10 < A_{CP} < 0.18$.

⁴Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.37 < A_{CP} < 0.28$.

<figure><img src="image_592.png" /><figcaption>WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.017±0.017 (Error scaled by 1.8)</figcaption></figure>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \chi_0(1550) K^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.04±0.07±0.02</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>060 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in the $B^+ \to K^+ K^- K^+$ decay.

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to K^* K^+ K^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.11±0.08±0.03</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06U BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \phi K^*(892)^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.01±0.08 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.00±0.09±0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.02±0.14±0.03</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.16±0.17±0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03V BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07BA</td></tr><tr><td>-0.13±0.29<sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.11</sub></td><td>2 CHEN</td><td>03B BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHEN 05A</td></tr><tr><td>-0.43<sup>+0.36</sup><sub>-0.30</sub>±0.06</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>02E BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 03V</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.25 < A_{CP} < 0.22$.

²Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.64 < A_{CP} < 0.36$.

³Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.88 < A_{CP} < 0.18$.

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \phi(K\pi)_0^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.04±0.15±0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BI BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \phi K_1(1270)^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.15±0.19±0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BI BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.23±0.19±0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BI BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to K^+ \phi K^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.08±0.07 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.02±0.11±0.11</td><td>1 MOHANTY</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.10±0.08±0.02</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>11A BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes $m_{\phi\phi} < 2.85$ GeV/c².

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to K^+ [\phi\phi]_{\eta_c})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.10±0.08 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.12±0.12±0.01</td><td>1 MOHANTY</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.09±0.10±0.02</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>11A BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹$m_{\phi\phi}$ is consistent with $\eta_c$ mass in [2.94, 3.02] GeV/c².

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to K^*(892)^+ \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.014±0.018 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.011±0.023±0.003</td><td>1 HORIGUCHI</td><td>17 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.018±0.028±0.007</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AO BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $B(\gamma(4S) \to B^+B^-) = (51.4 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\gamma(4S) \to B^0\bar{B}^0) = (48.6 \pm 0.6)\%$.

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \chi_5 \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0275±0.0184±0.0032</td><td>1 WATANUKI</td><td>19 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Using a sum-of-exclusive technique with $m_{\chi_5} < 2.8$ GeV/c².

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \eta K^+ \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.12±0.07 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.09±0.10±0.01</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.16±0.09±0.06</td><td>2 NISHIDA</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.09±0.12±0.01</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06M BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09</td></tr><tr><td>1 m<sub>ηK</sub> < 2.35 GeV/c<sup>2</sup>.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2 m<sub>ηK</sub> < 2.4 GeV/c<sup>2</sup>.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \phi K^+ \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.13±0.11 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.03±0.11±0.08</td><td>SAHOO</td><td>11A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.26±0.14±0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07Q BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \rho^+ \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.11±0.32±0.09</td><td>TANIGUCHI</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \pi^+ \pi^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.01±0.04 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.081±0.054±0.008</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>24 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.025±0.043±0.007</td><td>DUH</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.03±0.08±0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BC BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.07±0.06±0.01</td><td>LIN</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr><tr><td>-0.01±0.10±0.02</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05L BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07BC</td></tr><tr><td>0.00±0.10±0.02</td><td>2 CHAO</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHAO 04B</td></tr><tr><td>-0.02±0.10±0.01</td><td>3 CHAO</td><td>04B BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIN 08</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03±0.18<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.17</sub>±0.02</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>03L BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05L</td></tr><tr><td>0.30±0.30<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.04</sub>±0.02</td><td>5 CASEY</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHAO 04B</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Corresponds to a 90% CL interval of $-0.19 < A_{CP} < 0.21$.

²Corresponds to a 90% CL interval of $-0.17 < A_{CP} < 0.16$.

³This corresponds to 90% CL interval of $-0.18 < A_{CP} < 0.14$.

⁴Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.32 < A_{CP} < 0.27$.

⁵Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.23 < A_{CP} < 0.18$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.076 ± 0.008</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.5.</td></tr><tr><td>0.080 ± 0.004 ± 0.004</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23U LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.058 ± 0.008 ± 0.011</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14B0 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.032 ± 0.044<sup>+0.040</sup><sub>-0.037</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.117 ± 0.021 ± 0.011</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>14 LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14B0</td></tr><tr><td>-0.007 ± 0.077 ± 0.025</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05G BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09L</td></tr><tr><td>-0.39 ± 0.33 ± 0.12</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03M BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05G</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The second error includes both systematics and the uncertainties from CP asymmetries in restricted regions of phase space.

²AAIJ 14 reports A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>) = 0.584 ± 0.082 ± 0.027 ± 0.007 in the Dalitz plot region of m<sup>2</sup><sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></sub> > 15 GeV<sup>2</sup>/c<sup>4</sup> or m<sup>2</sup><sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></sub> < 0.4 GeV<sup>2</sup>/c<sup>4</sup>. The third uncertainty is due to the CP asymmetry of the B<sup>±</sup> → J/ψK<sup>±</sup> reference mode uncertainty.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>9.2 ± 6.8 ± 0.7</strong></td><td>LAI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ρ<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.003 ± 0.014</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.004 ± 0.017 ± 0.009</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23U LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.007 ± 0.011 ± 0.016</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.18 ± 0.07 <sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.15</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.074 ± 0.120<sup>+0.035</sup><sub>-0.055</sub></td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05G BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09L</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.19 ± 0.11 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04Z BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,B 05G</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹This result is obtained with an amplitude analysis of B<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays, using the isobar model within the mass range 1.0 < m(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>) < 1.5 GeV to describe the π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> S-wave contribution.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → f<sub>2</sub>(1270)π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.40 ± 0.06</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.468 ± 0.061 ± 0.046</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.267 ± 0.102 ± 0.048</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>19AL LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.41 ± 0.25 <sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.15</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.004 ± 0.247<sup>+0.028</sup><sub>-0.032</sub></td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05G BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09L</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹This result is obtained with an amplitude analysis of B<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays, using the isobar model within the mass range 1.0 < m(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>) < 1.5 GeV to describe the π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> S-wave contribution.

²Uses amplitude analysis of B<sup>±</sup> → π<sup>±</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ρ<sup>0</sup>(1450)π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.11 ± 0.05</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.129 ± 0.033 ± 0.359</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.109 ± 0.044 ± 0.024</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>19AL LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.06 ± 0.28 <sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.40</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹This result is obtained with an amplitude analysis of B<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays, using the isobar model within the mass range 1.0 < m(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>) < 1.5 GeV to describe the π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> S-wave contribution.

²Uses amplitude analysis of B<sup>±</sup> → π<sup>±</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ρ<sub>3</sub>(1690)π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.801 ± 0.114 ± 0.253</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹This result is obtained with an amplitude analysis of B<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays, using the isobar model within the mass range 1.0 < m(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>) < 1.5 GeV to describe the π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> S-wave contribution.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → f<sub>0</sub>(1370)π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.72 ± 0.15 ± 0.16</strong></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> nonresonant)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.14 ± 0.14<sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.08</sub></strong></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ρ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.03 ± 0.10</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.080 ± 0.150<sup>+0.023</sup><sub>-0.075</sub></td><td>LAI</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.01 ± 0.13 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07X BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.06 ± 0.17 <sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.05</sub></td><td>ZHANG</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by LAI 23</td></tr><tr><td>0.24 ± 0.16 ± 0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04Z BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07X</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → Xπ<sup>+</sup>, X → π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.182 ± 0.116 ± 0.007</strong></td><td>LAI</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ρ<sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.05 ± 0.05</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.054 ± 0.055 ± 0.010</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09G BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.00 ± 0.22 ± 0.03</td><td>ZHANG</td><td>03B BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.12 ± 0.13 ± 0.10</td><td>AUBERT,BE</td><td>06G BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09G</td></tr><tr><td>-0.19 ± 0.23 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03V BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 06G</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ωπ<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.04 ± 0.05</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.048 ± 0.065 ± 0.038</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.02 ± 0.08 ± 0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AE BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.02 ± 0.09 ± 0.01</td><td>JEN</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.34 ± 0.25</td><td>2 CHEN</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.01 ± 0.10 ± 0.01</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06E BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AE</td></tr><tr><td>0.03 ± 0.16 ± 0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04H BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,B 06E</td></tr><tr><td>0.50 <sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.20</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>3 WANG</td><td>04A BELL</td><td>Repl. by JEN 06</td></tr><tr><td>-0.01 <sup>+0.29</sup><sub>-0.31</sub> ± 0.03</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>02E BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 04H</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹This result is obtained with an amplitude analysis of B<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays, using the isobar model within the mass range 1.0 < m(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>) < 1.5 GeV to describe the π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> S-wave contribution.

²Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.75 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.07.

³Corresponds to 90% CL interval -0.25 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.41.

⁴Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.50 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.46.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ωρ<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.20 ± 0.09 ± 0.02</strong></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.04 ± 0.18 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06T BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09H</td></tr><tr><td>0.05 ± 0.26 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>05O BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,B 06T</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ηπ<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.14 ± 0.07</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.4.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.19 ± 0.06 ± 0.01</td><td>HOI</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03 ± 0.09 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.08 ± 0.10 ± 0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AE BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.23 ± 0.09 ± 0.02</td><td>CHANG</td><td>07B BELL</td><td>Repl. by HOI 12</td></tr><tr><td>-0.13 ± 0.12 ± 0.01</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05K BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,07AE</td></tr><tr><td>0.07 ± 0.15 ± 0.03</td><td>CHANG</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHANG 07B</td></tr><tr><td>-0.44 ± 0.18 ± 0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04H BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,B 05K</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ηρ<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.11 ± 0.11</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.13 ± 0.11 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AH BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.04<sup>+0.34</sup><sub>-0.32</sub> ± 0.01</td><td>WANG</td><td>07B BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.02 ± 0.18 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05K BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AH</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → η'ρ<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.06 ± 0.16</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.03 ± 0.17 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.20<sup>+0.37</sup><sub>-0.36</sub> ± 0.04</td><td>SCHUEMANN</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.21 ± 0.17 ± 0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AE BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr><tr><td>0.14 ± 0.16 ± 0.01</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05K BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AE</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → η'ρ<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.26 ± 0.17 ± 0.02</strong></td><td>DEL-AMO-SA...10A BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.04 ± 0.28 ± 0.02</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07E BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10A</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Reports A<sub>CP</sub> with the opposite sign convention.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → b<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>+0.05 ± 0.16 ± 0.02</strong></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BI BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
$A_{CP}(B^+ \to p\bar{p}\pi^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.00 &plusmn; 0.04 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.02 &plusmn; 0.05 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>1 WEI</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>+0.04 &plusmn; 0.07 &plusmn; 0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&bull; &bull; We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. &bull; &bull;</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.16 &plusmn; 0.22 &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>WANG</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by WEI 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Requires $m_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85$ GeV/c².

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to p\bar{p}K^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.00 &plusmn; 0.04 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.2.</td></tr><tr><td>0.021 &plusmn; 0.020 &plusmn; 0.004</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AF LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.17 &plusmn; 0.10 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>1 WEI</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.16 &plusmn; 0.07 &minus; 0.04</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>05L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&bull; &bull; We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. &bull; &bull;</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.047 &plusmn; 0.036 &plusmn; 0.007</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AU LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14AF</td></tr><tr><td>-0.05 &plusmn; 0.11 &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>WANG</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by WEI 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Requires $m_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85$ GeV/c².

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to p\bar{p}K^*(892^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.21 &plusmn; 0.16 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.4.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.01 &plusmn; 0.19 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>CHEN</td><td>08C BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>+0.32 &plusmn; 0.13 &plusmn; 0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to p\bar{\Lambda}\gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>+0.17 &plusmn; 0.16 &plusmn; 0.05</td><td>WANG</td><td>07C BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to p\bar{\Lambda}\pi^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>+0.01 &plusmn; 0.17 &plusmn; 0.04</td><td>WANG</td><td>07C BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to K^+\ell^+\ell^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.02 &plusmn; 0.08 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.03 &plusmn; 0.14 &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12S BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.18 &plusmn; 0.18 &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09T BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>+0.04 &plusmn; 0.10 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.07 &plusmn; 0.22 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06J BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">¹ Measured in the union of 0.10 &lt; q<sup>2</sup> &lt; 8.12 GeV<sup>2</sup>/c<sup>4</sup> and q<sup>2</sup> &gt; 10.11 GeV<sup>2</sup>/c<sup>4</sup>. LEES 12s reports also individual measurements A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> &rarr; K<sup>+</sup>&ell;<sup>+</sup>&ell;<sup>-</sup>) = 0.02 &plusmn; 0.18 &plusmn; 0.01 for 0.10 &lt; q<sup>2</sup> &lt; 8.12 GeV<sup>2</sup>/c<sup>4</sup> and A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> &rarr; K<sup>+</sup>&ell;<sup>+</sup>&ell;<sup>-</sup>) = -0.06 &plusmn; 0.22 &minus; 0.21 &plusmn; 0.01 for q<sup>2</sup> &gt; 10.11 GeV<sup>2</sup>/c<sup>4</sup>.</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to K^+e^+e^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>+0.14 &plusmn; 0.14 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to K^+\mu^+\mu^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.011 &plusmn; 0.017 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.012 &plusmn; 0.017 &plusmn; 0.001</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AN LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.05 &plusmn; 0.13 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.000 &plusmn; 0.033 &plusmn; 0.009 AAIJ 13BN LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 14AN

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to \pi^+\mu^+\mu^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.11 &plusmn; 0.12 &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to K^+\ell^+\ell^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.09 &plusmn; 0.14 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.01 &plusmn; 0.26 &minus; 0.24 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09T BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.13 &plusmn; 0.17 &minus; 0.16 &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.03 &plusmn; 0.23 &plusmn; 0.03 AUBERT,B 06J BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09T

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to K^*e^+e^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.14 &plusmn; 0.23 &minus; 0.22 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^+ \to K^*\mu^+\mu^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.12 &plusmn; 0.24 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

CP VIOLATION PARAMETERS IN $B^+ \to DK^+$ AND SIMILAR DECAYS

The parameters $r_{B^+}$ and $\delta_{B^+}$ are the magnitude ratio and strong phase difference between the amplitudes of $A(B^+ \to D(*)0 K(*)^+)$ and $A(B^- \to D(*)0 K(*)^-)$. The measured observables are defined as $x_{\pm} = r_{B^+} \cos(\delta_{B^+} \pm \gamma)$ and $y_{\pm} = r_{B^+} \sin(\delta_{B^+} \pm \gamma)$, and can be used to measure the CKM angle $\gamma$.

"OUR EVALUATION" is provided by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV). It is derived from combinations of their results on $B^+ \to DK^+$ and related processes.

γ

For angle $\gamma(\phi_3)$ of the CKM unitarity triangle, see the review on "CP Violation" in the Reviews section.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (°)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

65.9<sup>+2.9</sup><sub>-3.1</sub> OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>69 &plusmn; 13/14</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23BA LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>54.8 &plusmn; 6.0/8.8 &plusmn; 6.7</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>23I LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>116 &plusmn; 12/14</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>23N LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>78.4 &plusmn; 11.4 &plusmn; 1.1</td><td>4,5 ABUDINEN</td><td>22 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>65.4 &plusmn; 3.8/4.2</td><td>6 AAIJ</td><td>21AM LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>68.7 &plusmn; 5.2/5.1</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>21L LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>44 &plusmn; 12</td><td>7,8 AAIJ</td><td>21M LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5.7 &plusmn; 10.2/8.8 &plusmn; 6.7</td><td>9 RESMI</td><td>19 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>87 &plusmn; 11/12</td><td>10 AAIJ</td><td>18AD LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 21L</td></tr><tr><td>128 &plusmn; 17/22</td><td>11 AAIJ</td><td>18U LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5-86 or 185-266</td><td>12 AAIJ</td><td>18Z LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>80 &plusmn; 21/22</td><td>13 AAIJ</td><td>16AA LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 16Z</td></tr><tr><td>72.2 &plusmn; 6.8/7.3</td><td>14 AAIJ</td><td>16AQ LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 21AM</td></tr><tr><td>71 &plusmn; 20</td><td>15,16 AAIJ</td><td>16Z LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>74 &plusmn; 20/19</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>63.5 &plusmn; 7.2/6.7</td><td>17,18 AAIJ</td><td>15K LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>62 &plusmn; 15/14</td><td>19 AAIJ</td><td>14BA LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 21L</td></tr><tr><td>84 &plusmn; 49/42</td><td>20 AAIJ</td><td>14BE LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14BA</td></tr><tr><td>115 &plusmn; 28/43</td><td>21 AAIJ</td><td>14BF LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 18U</td></tr><tr><td>72.6 &plusmn; 9.7/17.2</td><td>22 AAIJ</td><td>13AK LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 21AM</td></tr><tr><td>69 &plusmn; 17/16</td><td>23 LEES</td><td>13B BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>44 &plusmn; 43/38</td><td>24,25 AAIJ</td><td>12AQ LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13AK</td></tr><tr><td>77.3 &plusmn; 15.1/14.9</td><td>25,26 AIHARA</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45).</td></tr><tr><td>68 &plusmn; 14 &plusmn; 5</td><td>27 DEL-AMO-SA...10F</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13B</td></tr><tr><td>7 to 173</td><td>28 DEL-AMO-SA...10G</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>78.4 &plusmn; 10.8 &plusmn; 9.6</td><td>29 POLUEKTOV</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>162 &plusmn; 56</td><td>30 AUBERT</td><td>09R BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>76 &plusmn; 22/23 &plusmn; 7.1</td><td>31 AUBERT</td><td>08AL BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10F</td></tr><tr><td>53 &plusmn; 15/18 &plusmn; 10</td><td>32 POLUEKTOV</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>Repl. by POLUEKTOV 10</td></tr><tr><td>70 &plusmn; 31 &plusmn; 18/15</td><td>33 AUBERT,B</td><td>05Y BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AL</td></tr><tr><td>77 &plusmn; 17/19 &plusmn; 17</td><td>34 POLUEKTOV</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by POLUEKTOV 06</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using $B^{\pm} \to D^{*\pm}K^{\pm}$ and $B^{\pm} \to D^{*\pm}\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\mp}$ decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully reconstructed $D^{*\pm} \to D\pi^0/\gamma$, $D \to (KS)^0\pi^{+}\pi^{-}/(KS)^0K^{+}K^{-}$ decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.

2 Measured using $B^{\pm} \to D[K\pm\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\mp}]h^{\pm}$ decays in bins of the phase space of the D decay. The third uncertainty includes systematic and finite knowledge of the D-meson decay parameters.

3 A model-dependent binned analysis of the decays $B^{\pm} \to [K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-]D_h^{\pm}$ is used.

4 Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0\pi^+\pi^-$ and $K_S^0K^+K^-$ from $B^{\pm} \to DK^{\pm}$ modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input. Value is modulo 180°.

5 Supersedes AIHARA 12.

6 AAIJ 21AM presents a combination of existing measurements from LHCb collaboration. It includes also charm mixing parameters.

7 Measured in $B_S^0 \to D_S^\pm K^\mp\pi^\pm\pi^\mp$ decays in restricted phase space with $m(K^+\pi^+\pi^-) < 1950$ MeV, $m(K^+\pi^-) < 1200$ MeV and $m(\pi^+\pi^-) < 1200$ MeV. The value is modulo 180°.

8 A model-independent coherence factor for the decay $B_S \to D_S K\pi\pi$ (in the restricted phase space region) is also reported.
# Meson Particle Listings

$B^{\pm}$

9 Uses binned analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$ from $B^\pm \to DK^\pm$ modes over the phase space. Strong phase measurements from RESMI 18 analysis of CLEO-c data of the $D$ decay over the phase space binning are used as input.

10 Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ and $K_S^0 K^+ K^-$ from $B^\pm \to DK^\pm$ modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c of the $D$ decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input.

11 Measured in $B_S^0 \to D_S^+ K^\pm$ decays, constraining $-2\beta_S$ by the measurement of $\phi_S = 0.030 \pm 0.033$ from HFLAV. The value is modulo $180^\circ$.

12 AAJ1 182 reports the intervals $(5-86)^\circ)$ or $(185-266)^\circ)$ at 68% C.L. The extraction uses the time dependent CP violation measurement in $B^0 \to D^+ \pi^\pm$ decays with external input and some theoretical assumptions.

13 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays coming from $B^0 \to DK^*(892)^0$ modes. Measures $r_{B0} = 0.39 \pm 0.13$, and $\delta_{B0} = 197_{-20}^{+24}$ degrees.

14 A combination of measurements from analyses of time-integrated $B^+ \to DK^+$, $B^0 \to DK(*)^0$, $B^0 \to DK^+ \pi^-$, and $B^+ \to DK^+ \pi^+ \pi^- \to$ tree-level decays. In addition, results from a time-dependent analysis of $B_S^0 \to D_S K$ decays are included.

15 A model-independent binned Dalitz plot analysis of the decays $B^0 \to DK^*0$, with $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ and $D \to K_S^0 K^+ K^-$. The results cannot be combined with the model-dependent analysis of the same dataset reported in AAJ16AA.

16 Angle $\gamma$ required to satisfy $0 < \gamma < 180^\circ$.

17 Obtained by measuring time-dependent CP asymmetry in $B_S^0 \to K^+ K^-$ and using a U-spin relation between $B_S^0 \to K^+ K^-$ and $B^0 \to \pi^+ \pi^-$.

18 Results are also presented using additional inputs on $B^0 \to \pi^0 \pi^0$ and $B^+ \to \pi^+ \pi^0$ decays from other experiments and isospin symmetry assumptions. The dependence of the results on the maximum allowed amount of U-spin breaking up to 50% is also included.

19 Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of $B^+ \to DK^+$ decays, with $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ and $D \to K_S^0 K^+ K^-$. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 10) of the $D$ decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input. Solution that satisfies $0 < \gamma < 180$ is chosen.

20 AAJ1 14BE uses model-dependent analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ amplitudes. The model is the same as in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10F.

21 Measured in $D^0 \to D_S^+ K^\pm$ decays, constraining $-2\beta_S$ by the measurement of $\phi_S = 0.01 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.0$ from AAJ1 13AR. The value is modulo $180^\circ$ at 68% CL.

22 Presents a confidence region $55.4^\circ < \gamma < 82.3^\circ$ at 68% CL with best fit value $72.6^\circ$ and includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The corresponding 95% CL is $40.2^\circ < \gamma < 92.7^\circ$. The value is determined from combination of measurements using $D$ meson decaying to $K^+ K^-$, $\pi^+ \pi^-$, $K^\pm \pi^-$, $K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$, $K_S^0 K^+ K^-$, and $K^\pm \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-$. Combines $B^\pm \to DK^\pm$ and $B^\pm \to D\pi^0$.

23 Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods. Reports also $2\sigma$ range of $41-102^\circ$ and a $5.9\sigma$ significance for $\gamma(B^+ \to D(*)^0 K(*)^+ \neq 0$ hypothesis.

24 Reports combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.

25 Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays from $B^+ \to D^0 K^+$. Measurement of strong phases in $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ Dalitz plot from LIBBY 10 is used as input.

26 We combined the systematics in quadrature. The authors report separately the contribution to the systematic uncertainty due to the uncertainty on the bin-averaged strong phase difference between $D^0$ and $D^0$ amplitudes. Superseded by ABUDINEN 22.

27 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$, $K_S^0 K^+ K^-$ decays from $B^+ \to D(*)^0 K^+$, $DK^*+^0$ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval for $\gamma$ is $39^\circ < \gamma < 98^\circ$. CP conservation in the combined result is ruled out with a significance of 3.5 standard deviations.

28 Reports confidence intervals for the CKM angle $\gamma$ from the measured values of the GLW parameters using $B^\pm \to DK^\pm$ decays with $D$ mesons decaying to non-$CP(\kappa)$, CP-even ($K^+ K^-$, $\pi^+ \pi^-$), and $CP$-odd ($K_S^0 \pi^0$, $K_S^0 \omega$) states.

29 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays from $B^+ \to D(*)^0 K^+$ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval for $\gamma$ is $54.2^\circ < \gamma < 100.5^\circ$. CP conservation in the combined result is ruled out with a significance of 3.5 standard deviations.

30 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays coming from $B^0 \to D^0 K^*0$ modes. The corresponding 95% CL interval is $77^\circ < \gamma < 247^\circ$. A 180 degree ambiguity is implied.

31 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ and $D^0 \to K_S^0 K^+ K^-$ decays coming from $B^\pm \to D(*)^0 K(*)^\pm$ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is $29^\circ < \gamma < 122^\circ$.

32 Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays; Combines the $DK^+$, $D^*K^+$ and $DK^*+^0$ modes. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for $\gamma$ is $8^\circ < \gamma < 111^\circ$.

33 Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of neutral $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays coming from $B^\pm \to DK^\pm$ and $B^\pm \to D^*0 K^\pm$ followed by $D^*0 \to D^0 \pi^0$, $D^0 \gamma$. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for $\gamma$ is $12^\circ < \gamma < 137^\circ$. AUBERT,B 05Y also reports the amplitude ratios and the strong phases.

34 Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the 3-body $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays coming from $B^\pm \to DK^\pm$ and $B^\pm \to D^*0 K^\pm$ followed by $D^*0 \to D^0 \pi^0$; here we use $D$ to denote that the neutral $D$ meson produced in the decay is an admixture of $D^0$ and $D^0$. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for $\gamma$ is $26^\circ < \gamma < 126^\circ$. POLUEKTOV 04 also reports the amplitude ratios and the strong phases.

$r_B(B^+ \to D^0 K^+)$

$r_B$ and $\delta_B$ are the amplitude ratio and relative strong phase between the amplitudes of $A(B^+ \to D^0 K^+)$ and $A(B^+ \to D^0 K^+)$,

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$) CL% DOCUMENT ID TECHN COMMENT

9.94 ± 0.26 OUR EVALUATION (Produced by HFLAV)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$9.46 \pm 0.31 \quad 0.30 \quad -0.24$

1 AAJ1

23I LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

<table><tbody><tr><td>11.0 ± 2.0</td><td>2 AAJ1</td><td>23N LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>12.9 ± 2.4 ± 0.2</td><td>3 ABUDINEN</td><td>22 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>9.04<sup>+0.77</sup><sub>-0.75</sub></td><td>4 AAJ1</td><td>21L LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>32.3 ± 14.7 ± 5.6</td><td>5 RESMI</td><td>19 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>8.6 <sup>+ 1.3</sup><sub>- 1.4</sub></td><td>6 AAJ1</td><td>18AD LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAJ1 21L</td></tr><tr><td>8.0 <sup>+ 1.9</sup><sub>- 2.1</sub></td><td>3 AAJ1</td><td>14BA LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAJ1 21L</td></tr><tr><td>6 ± 4</td><td>7 AAJ1</td><td>14BE LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAJ1 14BA</td></tr><tr><td>9.7 ± 1.1</td><td>8 AAJ1</td><td>13AE LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>9.2 <sup>+ 1.3</sup><sub>- 1.2</sub></td><td>9 LEES</td><td>13B BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>7 ± 4</td><td>10,11 AAJ1</td><td>12AQ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>14.5 ± 3.0 ± 1.5</td><td>11,12 AIHARA</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;13</td><td>13 LEES</td><td>11D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>9.6 ± 2.9 ± 0.6</td><td>14 DEL-AMO-SA..10F</td><td>8 BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13B</td></tr><tr><td>9.5 <sup>+ 5.1</sup><sub>- 4.1</sub></td><td>15 DEL-AMO-SA..10H BABR</td><td>13 BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13B</td></tr><tr><td>16.0 <sup>+ 4.0</sup><sub>- 3.8</sub> ± 5.1</td><td>16 POLUEKTOV</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>8.6 ± 3.2 ± 1.5</td><td>17 AUBERT</td><td>08AL BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10F</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;19</td><td>90 HORII</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>15.9 <sup>+ 5.4</sup><sub>- 5.0</sub> ± 5.0</td><td>18 POLUEKTOV</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>Repl. by POLUEKTOV 10</td></tr><tr><td>12 ± 8 ± 5</td><td>19 AUBERT,B</td><td>05Y BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AL</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using $B^\pm \to D[K^\pm \pi^\pm \pi^\mp \hbar^+] \hbar^\pm$ decays in bins of the phase space of the $D$ decay. The third uncertainty includes systematic and finite knowledge of the $D$-meson decay parameters.

2 A model-dependent binned analysis of the decays $B^\pm \to [K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^-]_D \hbar^\pm$ is used.

3 Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of $B^+ \to DK^+$ decays, with $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ and $D \to K_S^0 K^+ K^-$. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 10) of the $D$ decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input. Supersedes AIHARA 12.

4 Uses binned analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$ from $B^\pm \to DK^\pm$ modes over the phase space. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III data of the $D$ decay over the phase space binning are used as input.

5 Uses binned analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$ from $B^\pm \to DK^\pm$ modes over the phase space. Strong phase measurements from RESMI 18 analysis of CLEO-c data of the $D$ decay over the phase space binning are used as input.

6 Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \to K_S^0 K^+ K^-$ from $B^\pm \to DK^\pm$ modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c of the $D$ decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input.

7 AAJ1 14BE uses model-dependent analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ amplitudes. The model is the same as in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10F.

8 Uses $B^\pm \to [K^\pm \pi^+ \pi^-]_D \hbar^\pm$ mode.

9 Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods.

10 Reports combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.

11 Uses binned Dalitz plot of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays from $B^+ \to D^0 K^+$. Measurement of strong phases in $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ Dalitz plot from LIBBY 10 is used as input.

12 We combined the systematics in quadrature. The authors report separately the contribution to the systematic uncertainty due to the uncertainty on the bin-averaged strong phase difference between $D^0$ and $D^0$ amplitudes. Superseded by ABUDINEN 22.

13 Uses decays of neutral $D \to K^+ \pi^+ \pi^0$.

14 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$, $K_S^0 K^+ K^-$ decays from $B^+ \to D(*)^0 K(*)^+$ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is $0.037 < r_B < 0.155$.

15 Uses the Cabibbo suppressed decay of $B^+ \to DK^+$ followed by $D \to K^+ \pi^+$.

16 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays from $B^+ \to D^0 K^+$ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is $0.084 < r_B < 0.239$.

17 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ and $D^0 \to K_S^0 K^+ K^-$ decays coming from $B^\pm \to D(*)^0 K(*)^\pm$ modes.

18 Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays; Combines the $DK^+$, $D^*K^+$ and $DK^*+^0$ modes.

19 Uses a Dalitz analysis of neutral $D$ decays to $K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ in the processes $B^\pm \to D(*)^0 K^+$, $D^* \to D^0 \pi^0$, $D^0 \gamma$.

$\delta_B(B^+ \to D^0 K^+)$

VALUE (°) DOCUMENT ID TECHN COMMENT

127.7<sup>+3.6</sup><sub>-3.9</sub> OUR EVALUATION (Produced by HFLAV)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>134.6 ± 6.0<sup>+8.6</sup><sub>-8.7</sub></td><td>1 AAJ1</td><td>23I LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>81 <sup>+14</sup><sub>-13</sub></td><td>2 AAJ1</td><td>23N LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>124.8 ± 12.9 ± 1.8</td><td>3,4 ABUDINEN</td><td>22 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>118.3 <sup>+5.5</sup><sub>-5.6</sub></td><td>5 AAJ1</td><td>21L LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>83.4 <sup>+18.3</sup><sub>-16.6</sub> ± 5.1</td><td>6 RESMI</td><td>19 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>101 ± 11</td><td>7 AAJ1</td><td>18AD LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAJ1 21L</td></tr><tr><td>134 <sup>+14</sup><sub>-15</sub></td><td>8 AAJ1</td><td>14BA LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAJ1 21L</td></tr><tr><td>115 <sup>+41</sup><sub>-51</sub></td><td>8 AAJ1</td><td>14BE LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAJ1 14BA</td></tr><tr><td>105 <sup>+16</sup><sub>-17</sub></td><td>9 LEES</td><td>13B BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
$137 \quad \frac{+35}{-46}$

10,11 AAIJ

12AQ LHCB pp at 7 TeV

$129.9 \pm 15.0 \pm 6.0$

11,12 AIHARA

12

BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

$119 \quad \frac{+19}{-20} \pm 4$

13

DEL-AMO-SA...10F BABR Repl. by LEES 13B

$136.7 \pm \frac{13.0}{-15.8}$

14

POLUEKTOV 10 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

$109 \quad \frac{+27}{-30} \pm 8$

15

AUBERT 08AL BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10F

$145.7 \pm \frac{19.0}{-19.7}$

16

POLUEKTOV 06 BELL Repl. by POLUEKTOV 10

$104 \quad \pm \frac{45}{+23}$

17

AUBERT,B 05Y BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AL

1 Measured using $B^{\pm} \to D[\overline{K}^{\mp}\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\mp}]h^{\pm}$ decays in bins of the phase space of the D decay. The third uncertainty includes systematic and finite knowledge of the D-meson decay parameters.

2 A model-dependent binned analysis of the decays $B^{\pm} \to [K^{\pm}K^{-} \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}]_{D}h^{\pm}$ is used.

3 Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of $B^{\pm} \to DK^{\pm}$ decays, with $D \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ and $D \to K^0 \pi^{\pm} K^{-}$. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 10) of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input.

4 Supersedes AIHARA 12.

5 Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ and $K_S^0 K^{+} K^{-}$ from $B^{\pm} \to DK^{\pm}$ modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input. Value is modulo 180°.

6 Uses binned analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-} \pi^{0}$ from $B^{\pm} \to DK^{\pm}$ modes over the phase space. Strong phase measurements from RESMI 18 analysis of CLEO-c data of the D decay over the phase space binning are used as input.

7 Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ and $K_S^0 K^{+} K^{-}$ from $B^{\pm} \to DK^{\pm}$ modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input.

8 AAIJ 14BE uses model-dependent analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ amplitudes. The model is the same as in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10F.

9 Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods.

10 Reports combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.

11 Uses binned Dalitz plot of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ decays from $B^+ \to D^0 K^+$. Measurement of strong phases in $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ Dalitz plot from LIBBY 10 is used as input.

12 We combined the systematics in quadrature. The authors report separately the contribution to the systematic uncertainty due to the uncertainty on the bin-averaged strong phase difference between $D^0$ and $D^0$ amplitudes. Superseded by ABUDINEN 22.

13 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$, $K_S^0 K^{+} K^{-}$ decays from $B^+ \to D^{(*)} K^{(*)+}$ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 75° < $\delta_B < 157°$.

14 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ decays from $B^+ \to D^0 K^+$ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 102.2° < $\delta_B < 162.3°$.

15 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ and $D^0 \to K_S^0 K^{+} K^{-}$ decays coming from $B^{\pm} \to D^{(*)} K^{(*)\pm}$ modes.

16 Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ decays; Combines the $D K^{+}$, $D^{*} K^{+}$ and $D K^{*+}$ modes.

17 Uses a Dalitz analysis of neutral D decays to $K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ in the processes $B^{\pm} \to D^{(*)} K^{\pm}$, $D^{*} \to D\pi^{0}$, $D\gamma$.

$r_B(B^+ \to D^0 \pi^+)$

VALUE (units $10^{-3}$)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$4.5 \pm 1.1 \pm 0.5$

$-1.0 \pm 0.4$

$4.1 \pm 5.4$

$\pm 4.1$

$17 \pm 6 \pm 1$

$5.0 \pm 1.7$

1

AAIJ

23I

LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

2

AAIJ

23N

LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

3

ABUDINEN

22

BELL

$e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

3

AAIJ

21L

LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

1 Measured using $B^{\pm} \to D[\overline{K}^{\mp}\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\mp}]h^{\pm}$ decays in bins of the phase space of the D decay. The third uncertainty includes systematic and finite knowledge of the D-meson decay parameters.

2 A model-dependent binned analysis of the decays $B^{\pm} \to [K^{\pm}K^{-} \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}]_{D}h^{\pm}$ is used.

3 Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ and $K_S^0 K^{+} K^{-}$ from $B^{\pm} \to D\pi^{\pm}$ modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input.

$\delta_B(B^+ \to D^0 \pi^+)$

VALUE (°)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$311.8 \pm \frac{+14.7}{-15.0}$

1

AAIJ

23I

LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$298 \quad \pm \frac{62}{-118}$

$341.0 \pm 17.0 \pm 2.9$

2

AAIJ

23N

LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

3

ABUDINEN

22

BELL

$e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

$291 \quad \pm \frac{24}{-26}$

3

AAIJ

21L

LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

1 Measured using $B^{\pm} \to D[\overline{K}^{\mp}\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\mp}]h^{\pm}$ decays in bins of the phase space of the D decay. The third uncertainty includes systematic and finite knowledge of the D-meson decay parameters.

2 A model-dependent binned analysis of the decays $B^{\pm} \to [K^{\pm}K^{-} \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}]_{D}h^{\pm}$ is used.

3 Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ and $K_S^0 K^{+} K^{-}$ from $B^{\pm} \to D\pi^{\pm}$ modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input. Value is modulo 180°.

$r_B(B^+ \to D^0 K^{+*})$

$r_B$ and $\delta_B$ are the amplitude ratio and relative strong phase between the amplitudes of $A_{CP}(B^+ \to D^0 K^{+*})$ and $A_{CP}(B^+ \to D^0 K^{+*})$,

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

### 0.101 $\frac{+0.016}{-0.034}$ OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$0.143 \pm \frac{+0.048}{-0.049}$

$0.166 \pm \frac{+0.073}{-0.069}$

$0.31 \pm 0.07$

$0.181 \pm \frac{+0.088}{-0.108} \pm 0.042$

$0.564 \pm \frac{+0.216}{-0.155} \pm 0.093$

1

LEES

13B

BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

2

DEL-AMO-SA...10F BABR Repl. by LEES 13B

3

AUBERT 09AJ BABR Repl. by LEES 13B

4

AUBERT 08AL BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AJ

5

POLUEKTOV 06 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

1 Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods.

2 DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10F reports $r_B \cdot k = 0.149 \pm \frac{0.066}{-0.062}$ for $k = 0.9$.

3 Obtained by combining the GLW and ADS methods. The 2-sigma range corresponds to [0.17, 0.43].

4 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ and $D^0 \to K_S^0 K^{+} K^{-}$ decays coming from $B^{\pm} \to D^{(*)} K^{(*)\pm}$ modes.

5 Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ decays; Combines the $D K^{+}$, $D^{*} K^{+}$ and $D K^{*+}$ modes.

$\delta_B(B^+ \to D^0 K^{+*})$

VALUE (°)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

### 48 $\frac{+59}{-16}$ OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$101 \pm 43$

$111 \pm 32$

$104 \pm \frac{+39}{-37} \pm 18$

$242.6 \pm \frac{+2.2}{-2.2} \pm 49.4$

1

LEES

13B

BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

DEL-AMO-SA...10F

BABR

Repl. by LEES 13B

2

AUBERT 08AL BABR Repl. by LEES 13B

3

POLUEKTOV 06 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

1 Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods.

2 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ and $D^0 \to K_S^0 K^{+} K^{-}$ decays coming from $B^{\pm} \to D^{(*)} K^{(*)\pm}$ modes.

3 Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ decays; Combines the $D K^{+}$, $D^{*} K^{+}$ and $D K^{*+}$ modes.

$r_B(B^+ \to D^0 K^+)$

$r_B$ and $\delta_B$ are the amplitude ratio and relative strong phase between the amplitudes of $A(B^+ \to D^0 K^+)$ and $A(B^+ \to D^0 K^+)$,

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

### 0.104 $\frac{+0.013}{-0.014}$ OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$0.15 \pm 0.03$

$0.106 \pm \frac{+0.19}{-0.036}$

$0.133 \pm \frac{+0.042}{-0.039} \pm 0.013$

$0.096 \pm \frac{+0.035}{-0.051}$

$0.196 \pm \frac{+0.072}{-0.069} \pm 0.014$

$0.135 \pm 0.050 \pm 0.012$

1

AAIJ

23BA

LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

2

LEES

13B

BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

3

DEL-AMO-SA...10F BABR Repl. by LEES 13B

4

DEL-AMO-SA...10H BABR Repl. by LEES 13B

5

POLUEKTOV 10 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

6

AUBERT 08AL BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10F

7

POLUEKTOV 06 BELL Repl. by POLUEKTOV 10

8

AUBERT,B

05Y

BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AL

1 Measured using $B^{\pm} \to D^{*} K^{\pm}$ decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully reconstructed $D^{*} \to D\pi^{0}/\gamma$, $D \to (KS) \pi^{0} \pi^{-}/(KS) \pi^{+} \pi^{-}$ decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.

2 Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods.

3 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$, $K_S^0 K^{+} K^{-}$ decays from $B^+ \to D^{(*)} K^{(*)+}$ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.049 < $r_B^* < 0.215$.

4 Uses the Cabibbo suppressed decay of $B^+ \to D^* K^+$ followed by $D^* \to D\pi^0$ or $D\gamma$, and $D \to K^{*}\pi^{*}$.

5 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ decays from $B^+ \to D^{*0} K^{+}$ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.061 < $r_B^* < 0.271$.

6 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ and $D^0 \to K_S^0 K^{+} K^{-}$ decays coming from $B^{\pm} \to D^{(*)} K^{(*)\pm}$ modes.

7 Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ decays; Combines the $D K^{+}$, $D^{*} K^{+}$ and $D K^{*+}$ modes.

8 Uses a Dalitz analysis of neutral D decays to $K_S^0 \pi^{\pm} \pi^{-}$ in the processes $B^{\pm} \to D^{(*)} K^{\pm}$, $D^{*} \to D\pi^0$, $D\gamma$.

$\delta_B(B^+ \to D^0 K^{+*})$

VALUE (°)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

### 318.4 $\frac{+7.9}{-9.9}$ OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)
# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

311 ±14 ¹AAIJ 23BA LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

294 +21 -31 ²LEES 13B BABR $e^+e^-$ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

278 ±21 ± 6 ³DEL-AMO-SA..10F BABR Repl. by LEES 13b

341.9 +18.0 -19.6 ±23.1 ⁴POLUEKTOV 10 BELL $e^+e^-$ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

297 +27 -29 ± 6.4 ⁵AUBERT 08AL BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10F

302.0 +33.8 -35.1 ±23.7 ⁶POLUEKTOV 06 BELL Repl. by POLUEKTOV 10

296 ±41 +20 -19 ⁷AUBERT,B 05Y BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AL

1 Measured using $B^± → D^+K^±$ decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully reconstructed $D^* → Dπ^0/γ$, $D → (KS)0π^+π^−/(KS)0K^+K^−$ decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.

2 Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods. We added 360° to the value of $(-66^{+21}_{-31})°$ quoted by LEES 13b.

3 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $\bar{D}^0 → K_5^0π^+π^−$, $K_5^0K^+K^−$ decays from $B^+ → D^*(*)K^*(+) modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 236° < $\delta_B^* < 322°$.

4 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $\bar{D}^0 → K_5^0π^+π^−$ decays from $B^+ → D^+K^+$ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 296.5° < $\delta_B^* < 382.7°$.

5 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $\bar{D}^0 → K_5^0π^+π^−$ and $\bar{D}^0 → K_5^0K^+K^−$ decays coming from $B^± → D^*(*)K^*(+) modes.

6 Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the $\bar{D}^0 → K_5^0π^+π^−$ decays; Combines the $D K^+, D^+K^+$ and $D K^+K^+$ modes.

7 Uses a Dalitz analysis of neutral D decays to $K_5^0π^+π^−$ in the processes $B^± → D^*(*)K^±, D^* → Dπ^0, Dγ$.

### $\tau_B(B^+ → D^0\pi^+)$

$\tau_B$ and $\delta_B$ are the amplitude ratio and relative strong phase between the amplitudes of $A(B^+ → D^0\pi^+) $ and $A(B^+ → D^0\pi^+) $.

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.01 ± 0.01 ¹AAIJ 23BA LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹ Measured using $B^± → D^+π^±$ decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully reconstructed $D^* → Dπ^0/γ$, $D → (KS)0π^+π^−/(KS)0K^+K^−$ decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.

### $\delta_B(B^+ → D^0\pi^+)$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

37 ± 37 ¹AAIJ 23BA LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹ Measured using $B^± → D^+π^±$ decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully reconstructed $D^* → Dπ^0/γ$, $D → (KS)0π^+π^−/(KS)0K^+K^−$ decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.

## PARTIAL BRANCHING FRACTIONS

### $B(B^+ → K^+ℓ^+ℓ^−)$ ($q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)

#### 1.4 ±0.5 OUR AVERAGE

1.37 +0.60 -0.58 AAIJ 12AH LHCB pp at 7 TeV

1.30 ± 0.98 ± 0.14 AALTONEN 11AI CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

#### $B(B^+ → K^+ℓ^+ℓ^−)$ (2.0 < $q^2 < 4.3 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)

#### 1.1 ±0.5 OUR AVERAGE

1.24 +0.60 -0.55 AAIJ 12AH LHCB pp at 7 TeV

0.71 ± 1.00 ± 0.15 AALTONEN 11AI CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

#### $B(B^+ → K^+ℓ^+ℓ^−)$ (4.3 < $q^2 < 8.68 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)

#### 2.4 ±0.8 ±0.7 OUR AVERAGE

2.50 +0.88 -0.74 AAIJ 12AH LHCB pp at 7 TeV

1.71 ± 1.58 ± 0.49 AALTONEN 11AI CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

#### $B(B^+ → K^+ℓ^+ℓ^−)$ (10.09 < $q^2 < 12.86 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)

#### 2.1 ±0.6 OUR AVERAGE

2.13 ±0.72 -0.66 AAIJ 12AH LHCB pp at 7 TeV

1.97 ± 0.99 ± 0.22 AALTONEN 11AI CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

### $B(B^+ → K^+ℓ^+ℓ^−)$ (14.18 < $q^2 < 16.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)

#### $0.86^{+0.40}_{-0.32}$ OUR AVERAGE

1.00 ± 0.47 AAIJ 12AH LHCB pp at 7 TeV

0.52 ± 0.61 ± 0.09 AALTONEN 11AI CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

### $B(B^+ → K^+ℓ^+ℓ^−)$ (15.0 < $q^2 < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)

#### $1.78^{+0.32}_{-0.29}$ OUR AVERAGE

2.9 ±1.0 -0.8 ± 0.3 ¹WEHLE 21 BELL $e^+e^-$ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

2.1 ±1.2 -1.0 ± 0.2 ²WEHLE 21 BELL $e^+e^-$ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

1.58 ±0.32 -0.29 ± 0.11 ³AAIJ 14M LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ Measured with $\mu^+\mu^−$ as lepton pair.

² Measured with $e^+e^−$ as lepton pair.

³ Uses $B(B^+ → J/\psi(1S) K^*(892)^+) = (1.431 \pm 0.027 \pm 0.090) \times 10^{-3}$ for normalization and $\mu^+\mu^−$ as a lepton pair.

### $B(B^+ → K^+ℓ^+ℓ^−)$ ($q^2 > 16.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)

#### 1.3 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE

1.25 ± 0.46 AAIJ 12AH LHCB pp at 7 TeV

1.57 ± 0.96 ± 0.17 AALTONEN 11AI CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

### $B(B^+ → K^+ℓ^+ℓ^−)$ (1.0 < $q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)

#### $1.72^{+0.40}_{-0.32}$ OUR AVERAGE

1.2 ±0.9 -0.7 ± 0.2 1,2 WEHLE 21 BELL $e^+e^-$ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

1.7 ±1.0 ± 0.2 2,3 WEHLE 21 BELL $e^+e^-$ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

1.79 ±0.41 -0.37 ± 0.13 ⁴AAIJ 14M LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

2.57 ± 1.61 ± 0.40 AALTONEN 11AI CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

2.90 ±0.90 -0.85 AAIJ 12AH LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 14M

¹ Measured with $\mu^+\mu^−$ as lepton pair.

² Result is determined for the range $1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^4/c^2$.

³ Measured with $e^+e^−$ as lepton pair.

⁴ Uses $B(B^+ → J/\psi(1S) K^*(892)^+) = (1.431 \pm 0.027 \pm 0.090) \times 10^{-3}$ for normalization and $\mu^+\mu^−$ as a lepton pair. Measured in $1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

### $B(B^+ → K^+ℓ^+ℓ^−)$ (0.0 < $q^2 < 4.3 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)

#### $2.01 ±1.39 ±0.27$

### $B(B^+ → K^+e^+e^−)$ (0.045 < $q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE (units 10⁻⁸)

#### $55^{+11}_{-4}$

1 AAIJ 22J LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹ The reported value is converted from the measured $\text{dB}/\text{dq}^2 = (9.2^{+1.9}_{-0.8} \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-8}$ ($\text{GeV}^2/c^4$) by multiplying by the $\Delta q^2 = 5.955 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$ range.

### $B(B^+ → K^+\mu^+\mu^−)$ / $B(B^+ → K^+e^+e^−)$ (0.045 < $q^2 < 1.1 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE

#### $0.62^{+0.60}_{-0.36}$ ± 0.07

WEHLE 21 BELL $e^+e^-$ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

### $B(B^+ → K^+\mu^+\mu^−)$ / $B(B^+ → K^+e^+e^−)$ (1.1 < $q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE

#### $0.72^{+0.99}_{-0.44}$ ± 0.14

WEHLE 21 BELL $e^+e^-$ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

### $B(B^+ → K^+\mu^+\mu^−)$ / $B(B^+ → K^+e^+e^−)$ (0.045 < $q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE

#### $0.70^{+0.18}_{-0.13}$ ± 0.04

AAIJ 22J LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

### $B(B^+ → K^+\mu^+\mu^−)/B(B^+ → K^+e^+e^−)$ (15.0 < $q^2 < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE

#### $1.40^{+1.99}_{-0.68}$ ± 0.11

WEHLE 21 BELL $e^+e^-$ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

### $B(B^+ → K^+ℓ^+ℓ^−)$ ($q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT VALUE (units 10⁻⁷)

#### $0.51 ±0.08$ OUR AVERAGE

0.556 ± 0.053 ± 0.027 AAIJ 13H LHCB pp at 7 TeV

0.36 ± 0.11 ± 0.03 AALTONEN 11AI CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

¹ Measured in $0.05 < q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$ range.
B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$) (2.0 < $q^2$ < 4.3 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.60 ±0.07</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.573 ±0.053 ±0.023</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.80 ±0.15 ±0.05</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$) (4.3 < $q^2$ < 8.68 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.03 ±0.07</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>1.003 ±0.070 ±0.039</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.18 ±0.19 ±0.09</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$) (10.09 < $q^2$ < 12.86 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.58 ±0.05</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.565 ±0.050 ±0.022</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 ±0.12 ±0.05</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$) (14.18 < $q^2$ < 16.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.40 ±0.05</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.377 ±0.036 ±0.015</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.53 ±0.10 ±0.03</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$) (16.0 < $q^2$ < 18.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.354 ±0.036 ±0.018</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$) (18.0 < $q^2$ < 22.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

F$_{H}$ is a fractional contribution of (pseudo) scalar and tensor amplitudes to the decay width in the massless muon approximation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.312 ±0.040 ±0.016</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$) (15.0 < $q^2$ < 22.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.85 ±0.03 ±0.04</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14M LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$) (16.0 < $q^2$ GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.48 ±0.11 ±0.03</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$) (1.0 < $q^2$ < 6.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.26 ±0.12</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

Error includes scale factor of 1.9. See the ideogram below.

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.30 <sup>+0.41</sup><sub>-0.38</sub> ±0.05</td><td>1 CHOUDHURY 21 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.66 <sup>+0.32</sup><sub>-0.29</sub> ±0.04</td><td>2 CHOUDHURY 21 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.40 <sup>+0.98</sup><sub>-0.34</sub> ±0.69</td><td>3 AAIJ 19S LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.19 ±0.034 ±0.059</td><td>4 AAIJ 14M LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.41 ±0.20 ±0.10</td><td>AALTONEN 11AI CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.56 <sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.15</sub> ±0.06</td><td>5 AAIJ</td><td>14AR LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.205 ±0.085 ±0.070</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 14M</td></tr></tbody></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.26±0.12 (Error scaled by 1.9)

<figure><img src="image_593.png" /></figure>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$) (1.0 < $q^2$ < 6.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$) (units 10$^{-7}$)

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) / B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} e^{+} e^{-}$) (0.1 < $q^2$ < 1.1 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.994 <sup>+0.090</sup><sub>-0.082</sub> ±0.029</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) / B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} e^{+} e^{-}$) (1.0 < $q^2$ < 6.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.96 ±0.05</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.949 <sup>+0.042</sup><sub>-0.041</sub> ±0.022</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.39 <sup>+0.36</sup><sub>-0.33</sub> ±0.02</td><td>2 CHOUDHURY 21 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.846 <sup>+0.042</sup><sub>-0.039</sub> ±0.013</td><td>3,4 AAIJ</td><td>22V LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.846 <sup>+0.060</sup><sub>-0.054</sub> ±0.016</td><td>3,5 AAIJ</td><td>19S LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.745 <sup>+0.090</sup><sub>-0.074</sub> ±0.036</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>14AR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$) (0.0 < $q^2$ < 4.3 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.13 ±0.19 ±0.08</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) (1.00 < $q^2$ < 6.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.38 <sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.04</sub> ±0.08</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AZ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) (0.10 < $q^2$ < 2.00 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.33 <sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.12</sub> ±0.09</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AZ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) (2.00 < $q^2$ < 4.30 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5.38 <sup>+0.94</sup><sub>-0.87</sub> ±0.35</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AZ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) (4.30 < $q^2$ < 8.68 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.01 <sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.13</sub> ±0.09</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AZ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) (10.09 < $q^2$ < 12.86 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>5.07 <sup>+0.94</sup><sub>-0.89</sub> ±0.47</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AZ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) (14.18 < $q^2$ < 19.00 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.48 <sup>+0.39</sup><sub>-0.29</sub> ±0.05</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AZ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow \pi^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) / B($B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) (1.00 < $q^2$ < 6.00 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>3.8 ±0.9 ±0.1</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow \pi^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) (1.00 < $q^2$ < 6.00 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-9</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>4.55 <sup>+1.05</sup><sub>-1.00</sub> ±0.15</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^{+} \rightarrow \pi^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$) (15.00 < $q^2$ < 22.00 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-9</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>3.29 <sup>+0.84</sup><sub>-0.70</sub> ±0.07</strong></td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote n="1">¹ Uses $B(B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)K^{+}) = (0.998 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.040) \times 10^{-3}$ for normalization and $\mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ as a lepton pair.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ Measured for $B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ decays. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Measured for $B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} e^{+} e^{-}$ decays. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Measured by taking the ratio of the branching fraction from $B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} e^{+} e^{-}$ and $B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi(e^{+} e^{-}) K^{+}$ decays and multiplying it by the measured value of $B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+}$ and $J/\psi \rightarrow e^{+} e^{-}$ as in PDG 18. The branching fraction of $B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} e^{+} e^{-}$ is determined in the region $1.1 < q^2 < 6$ GeV$^2$/c$^4$.</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Uses $B(B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)K^{+}) = (0.998 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.040) \times 10^{-3}$ for normalization and $\mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ for leptons. Measured for $1.1 < q^2 < 6$ GeV$^2$/c$^4$.</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵ Measured by taking the ratio of the branching fraction from $B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} e^{+} e^{-}$ and $B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi(e^{+} e^{-}) K^{+}$ decays and multiplying it by the measured value of $B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+}$ and $J/\psi \rightarrow e^{+} e^{-}$ as in PDG 12. The branching fraction of $B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} e^{+} e^{-}$ is determined in the region $1 < q^2 < 6$ GeV$^2$/c$^4$.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ Measured for the region $1.1 < q^2 < 6$ GeV$^2$/c$^4$.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ The ratio is determined using the relative branching fractions of the decays $B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$ and $B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi(\rightarrow \ell^{+} \ell^{-}) K^{+}$, with $\ell = e, \mu$. Measured for the region $1.1 < q^2 < 6$ GeV$^2$/c$^4$.</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Superseded by AAIJ 23AB.</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵ Superseded by AAIJ 22V.</footnote>
$$B(B^{\pm} \rightarrow \pi^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-})/B(B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (15.0 < q^2 < 22.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.7±0.8±0.1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{FB}(B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

$A_{FB}$ is the forward-backward angular asymmetry of the lepton pair in $B \rightarrow K^{(*)} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$ decay as defined in $B^{+}$, $B^{0}$ admixture particle listings.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>-0.003±0.017 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>-0.14 <sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.06</sub> ±0.03</td><td>1 SIRUNYAN</td><td>18DX CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.005±0.015±0.010</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>14O LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.02 <sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.03</sub> ±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14O</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measurement is performed in $1.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$. SIRUNYAN 18DX reports also measurements in several other $q^2$ intervals.

2 AAIJ 14O reports 68% C.L. interval, which we encode as midpoint with uncertainty as half of the width of interval.

$$A_{FB}(B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (15.0 < q^2 < 22.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.015±0.015±0.01</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14O LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 14O reports 68% C.L. interval, which we encode as midpoint with uncertainty as half of the width of interval.

$$F_{H}(B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

$F_H$ is a fractional contribution of (pseudo) scalar and tensor amplitudes to the decay width in the massless muon approximation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>0.04±0.04 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.38 <sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.21</sub> ±0.09</td><td>1 SIRUNYAN</td><td>18DX CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.03±0.03±0.02</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>14O LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.05 <sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.05</sub> ±0.04</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14O</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measurement is performed in $1.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$. SIRUNYAN 18DX reports also measurements in several other $q^2$ intervals.

2 AAIJ 14O reports 68% C.L. interval, which we encode as midpoint with uncertainty as half of the width of interval.

$$F_{H}(B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (15.0 < q^2 < 22.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

$F_H$ is a fractional contribution of (pseudo) scalar and tensor amplitudes to the decay width in the massless muon approximation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.035±0.035±0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14O LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 14O reports 68% C.L. interval, which we encode as midpoint with uncertainty as half of the width of interval.

## FORWARD-BACKWARD ASYMMETRIES

The forward-backward asymmetry is defined as $A_{FB} = [N(q_{FB} > 0) - N(q_{FB} < 0)] / [N(q_{FB} > 0) + N(q_{FB} < 0)]$, where $q_{FB} = -q_B \cdot \text{sgn}(\eta_B)$ with $q_B$ as the B hadron electric charge, $\eta_B$ as its pseudorapidity, and $\text{sgn}(\eta_B)$ as a sign function of $\eta_B$.

$$A_{FB}(B^{\pm} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{\pm})$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.24±0.41±0.19</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>15 D0</td><td>$p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{FB} \text{ in } B^{+} \rightarrow \bar{D}^{0} e^{+} \nu_{e}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.234±0.026±0.006</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>$e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Gamma(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{FB} \text{ in } B^{+} \rightarrow \bar{D}^{0} \mu^{+} \nu_{\mu}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.243±0.026±0.006</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>$e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Gamma(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$\Delta(A_{FB}) = (A_{FB}^{\pm} - A_{FB}^{0}) \text{ in } B^{+} \rightarrow \bar{D}^{0} e^{+} \nu_{e}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.008±0.037±0.009</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>$e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Gamma(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{FB}(B^{\pm} \rightarrow K^{*}(892)\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (1.0 < q^2 < 8.68 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.14 <sup>+0.32</sup><sub>-0.35</sub> ±0.17</td><td>1,2 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21AC CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 SIRUNYAN 21AC measurement is performed in $1.0 < q^2 < 8.68 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$. Reports also measurements in several other $q^2$ intervals.

2 $A_{FB}$ is defined with respect to $\mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ direction and not the B direction.

$$A_{FB}(B^{\pm} \rightarrow K^{*}(892)\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.08 <sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.08</sub> ±0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21J LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the $q^2$. The $A_{FB}$ is measured related to the dimuon system.

$$A_{FB}(B^{\pm} \rightarrow K^{*}(892)\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (10.09 < q^2 < 12.86 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.09 <sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.11</sub> ±0.04</td><td>1,2 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21AC CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 SIRUNYAN 21AC measurement is performed in $10.09 < q^2 < 12.86 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$. Reports also measurements in several other $q^2$ intervals.

2 $A_{FB}$ is defined with respect to $\mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ direction and not the B direction.

$$A_{FB}(B^{\pm} \rightarrow K^{*}(892)\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (14.18 < q^2 < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.33 <sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.07</sub> ±0.05</td><td>1,2 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21AC CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 SIRUNYAN 21AC measurement is performed in $14.18 < q^2 < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$. Reports also measurements in several other $q^2$ intervals.

2 $A_{FB}$ is defined with respect to $\mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ direction and not the B direction.

$$A_{FB}(B^{\pm} \rightarrow K^{*}(892)\mu^{+} \mu^{-}) (15.0 < q^2 < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.31±0.06±0.04</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21J LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the $q^2$. The $A_{FB}$ is measured related to the dimuon system.

$$A_{P}(B^{\pm}) = [\sigma(B^{-}) - \sigma(B^{+})] / [\sigma(B^{-}) + \sigma(B^{+})]$$

Production asymmetries

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>-5.7±1.7 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>-7.0±0.8±3.1</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23U LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-4.1±4.9±1.0</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>17AP LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-5.3±3.1±1.0</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>17AP LHCB</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-2.3±2.4±3.7</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>17BF LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-7.4±1.5±3.2</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>17BF LHCB</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The second error includes the uncertainties from $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+}) = 0.0018 \pm 0.0030$.

2 AAIJ 17AP uses $B^{+} \rightarrow \bar{D}^{0} \pi^{+}$ decays with $B^{+}$ transverse momenta $p_T$ and rapidities $y$ in the region of $2 < p_T < 30 \text{ GeV/c}$ and $2.1 < y < 4.5$.

3 AAIJ 17BF uses $B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+}$ decays with $B^{+}$ transverse momenta $p_T$ and rapidities $y$ in the region of $0 < p_T < 30 \text{ GeV/c}$ and $2.1 < y < 4.5$.

## B$^{±}$ REFERENCES

<table><tbody><tr><td>ADACHI</td><td>24 PR D109 0012001</td><td>I. Adachi et al.</td><td>(BELLE II Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AB PRL 131 051803</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20P PR D108 032002</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AH PR D108 032010</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AI PR D108 034012</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AK JHEP 2308 174</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AR PRL 131 111802</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AX JHEP 2309 202</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23B PR D108 012017</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23BA JHEP 2312 013</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23I JHEP 2307 138</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23N EPJ C83 547</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23Q PRL 131 031901</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23U PR D108 012008</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23V PR D108 012013</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23X PR D108 012020</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADACHI</td><td>23L JHEP 2309 146</td><td>I. Adachi et al.</td><td>(BELLE II Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHU</td><td>23 JHEP 108 112007</td><td>K.-N. Chu et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HIRATA</td><td>23 PR D107 112011</td><td>H. Hirata et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HSU</td><td>23 PR D107 032013</td><td>C.-L. Hsu et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>KUMAR</td><td>23 PR D107 031101</td><td>M. Kumar et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LAI</td><td>23 PR 130 181804</td><td>Y.-T. Lai et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>23C JHEP 201 201801</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>MEIER</td><td>23 PR D107 092003</td><td>F. Meier et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PRIM</td><td>23 PR D108 012002</td><td>M.T. Prim et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>WATANUKI</td><td>23 PR 130 261802</td><td>S. Watanuki et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>22D PRL 2204 046</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>22J PRL 128 191802</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>22K JHEP 2207 099</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>22V JHEP 18 277</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABUDINEN</td><td>22 JHEP 2202 063</td><td>F. Abudinen et al.</td><td>(BELLE and BELLE II Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BLOOMFIELD</td><td>22 PR D105 072007</td><td>T. Bloomfield et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>GEBAUER</td><td>22 PR D106 032013</td><td>U. Gebauer et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21AM JHEP 2112 141</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21H PR 126 091802</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21J PR 126 161802</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21L JHEP 2102 169</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21M JHEP 2103 137</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21Q JHEP 2104 081</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABUDINEN</td><td>21 PR 125 181802</td><td>F. Abudinen et al.</td><td>(BELLE II Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BELENO</td><td>21 PR D103 112001</td><td>C. Beleno et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CAO</td><td>21A PR D104 012008</td><td>L. Cao et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHOUDHURY</td><td>21 JHEP 2103 105</td><td>S. Choudhury et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>MOHANTY</td><td>21 PR D103 052013</td><td>S. Mohanty et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>21AC JHEP 2104 124</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>WEHLE</td><td>21 PR 126 161801</td><td>S. Wehle et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20A PR 124 031801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AI PR D101 012006</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AI PR D102 112003</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AN JHEP 2012 139</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20D PR D101 032005</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20K JHEP 2003 146</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20N JHEP 2006 058</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20P JHEP 2006 129</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20S JHEP 2008 123</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHILIKIN</td><td>20 JHEP 2005 034</td><td>K. Chilikin et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHU</td><td>20 PR D101 052012</td><td>K. Chu et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>20P RLI 152001</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PRIM</td><td>20 PR D101 032007</td><td>M.T. Prim et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AL PR 123 092009</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AL PR 123 231802</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AM PR 123 241802</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><tbody><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>19D</td><td>EPJ C79 537</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>19S</td><td>EPJ C79 675</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>19P</td><td>PRL 122 191801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BHARDWAJ</td><td>19</td><td>PR D99 111101</td><td>V. Bhardwaj et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHILIKIN</td><td>19</td><td>PR D100 012001</td><td>K. Chilikin et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>GARG</td><td>19</td><td>PR D99 071102</td><td>R. Garg et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>KALIYAR</td><td>19</td><td>PR D99 031102</td><td>A.B. Kaliyar et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>19C</td><td>PRL D100 11101</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LI</td><td>19A</td><td>PRL 122 082001</td><td>Y.B. Li et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LI</td><td>19G</td><td>PRL D100 112010</td><td>Y. Li et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LU</td><td>19</td><td>PR D99 032003</td><td>P.-C. Lu et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LDG</td><td>19</td><td>PLP 2019 at pdg.bjlgov</td><td>M. Tajabashi et al.</td><td>(PDG Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>RESMI</td><td>19</td><td>JHEP 1910 178</td><td>P.K. Resmi et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>19CM</td><td>JHEP 1912 100</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>WATANUKI</td><td>19</td><td>PR D99 032012</td><td>S. Watanuki et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>18A</td><td>PL B777 16</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>18AD</td><td>PR D97 0308 176</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>18H</td><td>JHEP 1810 107 (errat.)</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>18B</td><td>JHEP 1801 131</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>18P</td><td>JHEP 1803 059</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>18W</td><td>JHEP 1805 160</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>18X</td><td>JHEP 1805 067</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>18Z</td><td>PR D99 030001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AGEL</td><td>18</td><td>PR D98 121016</td><td>M. Gebel et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>KATO</td><td>18</td><td>PR D97 012005</td><td>Y. Kato et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LI</td><td>18A</td><td>EPJ C78 252</td><td>Y.B. Li et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PDG</td><td>18A</td><td>PR D98 030001</td><td>M. Tanabashi et al.</td><td>(PDG Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>18</td><td>PR D98 01201</td><td>P.E. Resmi et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SIBIDANOV</td><td>18</td><td>PRL 121 031801</td><td>A. Sibidanov et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>18DX</td><td>PR D98 120118</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>VOSSEN</td><td>18</td><td>PR D98 012005</td><td>A. Vossen et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17A</td><td>PR D95 012002</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17AD</td><td>PR D97 0305 305</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17AP</td><td>PR D95 052005</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17AQ</td><td>PR D95 071101</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17AR</td><td>PR D96 091110</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17BF</td><td>PL B774 139</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17BO</td><td>JHEP 1711 156</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17C</td><td>PL B774 307</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17K</td><td>EPJ C77 72</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17O</td><td>JHEP 1703 036</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17R</td><td>JHEP 1704 162</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>17Y</td><td>EPJ C77 161</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>17A</td><td>PR D96 011001</td><td>V. Beleno et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BELENO</td><td>17</td><td>PR D96 091102</td><td>C. Beleno et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>GRYGIER</td><td>17</td><td>PR D96 091101</td><td>J. Grygier et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HORIGUCHI</td><td>17</td><td>PR 119 191802</td><td>T. Horiguchi et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HSU</td><td>17</td><td>PR D96 031101</td><td>C.-L. Hsu et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>KHACHATRY...</td><td>17C</td><td>PL D97 66</td><td>V., Khachatryan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>17C</td><td>PR D97 66</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>17G</td><td>PR D96 072001</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AABOOD</td><td>16L</td><td>PR C76 513</td><td>M. Aaboud et al.</td><td>(ATLAS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>16AA</td><td>JHEP 1608 137</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>16AH</td><td>PR D94 072001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>16AQ</td><td>JHEP 1612 087</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>16I</td><td>PL B760 117</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>16M</td><td>PR D93 051101</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>16R</td><td>PR D93 119902</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>16Z</td><td>JHEP 1606 131</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>16E</td><td>PL B777 161</td><td>V. Bhardwaj et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BHARDWAJ</td><td>15</td><td>PR D93 052016</td><td>BELLE Collab.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>16</td><td>PR D93 052013</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>15C</td><td>PR D91 048101</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PDG</td><td>16</td><td>CP C40 100001</td><td>C. Patrignani et al.</td><td>(PDG Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>15AR</td><td>JHEP 1510 034</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>15BC</td><td>PR D92 121005</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>15K</td><td>PL B760 117</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>15L</td><td>PL 115 051801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>15V</td><td>PR D91 092002</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>15W</td><td>PR D93 119901 (errat.)</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>15W</td><td>PR D91 121014</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>15</td><td>PRL 114 051803</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BALA</td><td>15</td><td>PR D91 051101</td><td>A. Bala et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHOI</td><td>15A</td><td>PR D91 092011</td><td>S.-K. Choi et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>GOH</td><td>15A</td><td>PR D91 071101</td><td>Y.M. Goh et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HELLER</td><td>15</td><td>PR D91 112009</td><td>A. Heiler et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>KRNIENBIT...</td><td>15</td><td>PR D97 030001</td><td>B. Kronenbitter et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>15C</td><td>PR D91 021203</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>15C</td><td>PR D91 052002</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>VINOKUROVA</td><td>15C</td><td>PR D93 1506 132</td><td>A. Vinokurova et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>15W</td><td>JHEP 1702 088 (errat.)</td><td>A. Vinokurova et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>WIECHCZYN...</td><td>15</td><td>PR D91 032008</td><td>J. Wiechczynski et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>YOK</td><td>15</td><td>PR D91 052016</td><td>Y. Yok et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14</td><td>PRL 112 011801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14A</td><td>PL B728 85</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14AC</td><td>PRL 112 131802</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14AF</td><td>PRL 113 141801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14C</td><td>PR D91 112003</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14AR</td><td>PRL 113 151601</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14AZ</td><td>JHEP 1410 064</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14BA</td><td>JHEP 1410 097</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14BE</td><td>NP B888 169</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14BF</td><td>JHEP 1411 060</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14BO</td><td>PR D90 121004</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14E</td><td>JHEP 1404 114</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14M</td><td>JHEP 1406 133</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14O</td><td>JHEP 1405 082</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14V</td><td>PL B733 36</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>15A</td><td>PL D97 030004</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHOBANOVA</td><td>14</td><td>P D90 012002</td><td>V. Chobanova et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>IWASHITA</td><td>14</td><td>PTEP 2014 043C01</td><td>T. Iwashita et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>PR D89 011102</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>TIEN</td><td>14</td><td>PR D89 011101</td><td>K.-J. Tien et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>14A</td><td>PL B728 44</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13AK</td><td>PL B726 151</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13AP</td><td>PR D87 092007</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13AR</td><td>PR D87 112010</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13AU</td><td>PR D88 052015</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13AZ</td><td>PRL 111 101801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13BC</td><td>PRL 111 120003</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13BN</td><td>PRL 111 151801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13BS</td><td>PL B726 646</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13H</td><td>JHEP 1302 105</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13R</td><td>JHEP 1302 043</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13S</td><td>PL B726 2462</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>13Z</td><td>JHEP 1309 006</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>13M</td><td>PRL 110 241801</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DUH</td><td>13</td><td>PR D87 031103</td><td>Y. T. Duh et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HARA</td><td>13</td><td>PRL 110 131801</td><td>K. Hara et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>13A</td><td>PL D87 032004</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>13B</td><td>PR D87 052015</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>13I</td><td>PR D87 112005</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>13K</td><td>PR D88 031102</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>LEES</td><td>13M</td><td>PR D88 032012</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>13T</td><td>PR D88 072006</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LUTZ</td><td>13</td><td>PR D87 111103</td><td>O. Lutz et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>NAYAK</td><td>13</td><td>PR D88 091104</td><td>M. Nayak et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SIBIDANOV</td><td>13</td><td>PR D88 032005</td><td>A. Sibidanov et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>12AA</td><td>PR D85 091105</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>12AD</td><td>PR D85 112004</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>12AH</td><td>JHEP 1207 133</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>12AQ</td><td>PL B718 43</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>12AY</td><td>JHEP 1212 125</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>12C</td><td>PL 108 101601</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>12E</td><td>PL B708 241</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>12L</td><td>EPJ C72 2118</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>12M</td><td>PL B712 203</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>12T</td><td>PL B713 351 (errat.)</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>12C</td><td>PL D85 112014</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AIHARA</td><td>12</td><td>PR D85 092017</td><td>H. Alhara et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>12</td><td>PR D85 092017</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HOI</td><td>12</td><td>PL 108 031801</td><td>C.-T. Hoi et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>KIM</td><td>12A</td><td>PR D86 031101</td><td>J.H. Kim et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12AA</td><td>PR D86 092004</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12B</td><td>PR D86 052003</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12D</td><td>PR 109 101802</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>12J</td><td>PR D88 072012</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12J</td><td>PR D85 071103</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12O</td><td>PR D85 121010</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12P</td><td>PR D86 012004</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>PR D86 032012</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12Z</td><td>PR D86 091102</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PDG</td><td>12</td><td>PR D86 001001</td><td>J. Beringer et al.</td><td>(PDG Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>STYPULA</td><td>12</td><td>PR D86 072007</td><td>J. Stypula et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>11E</td><td>PR D84 092001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>11E</td><td>PR D85 039904 (errat.)</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11</td><td>PL 106 121804</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11A</td><td>PL 107 201802</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AJ</td><td>PL D84 091504</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11B</td><td>PR D83 032008</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11D</td><td>PL 106 161801</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUSHEV</td><td>11</td><td>PR D83 051102</td><td>T. Aushev et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BHARDWAJ</td><td>11</td><td>PL 107 091803</td><td>V. Bhardwaj et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHEN</td><td>11F</td><td>PL D84 071501</td><td>P. Chen et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHOI</td><td>11</td><td>PR D84 052004</td><td>S.-K. Choi et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>11C</td><td>PR D83 032004</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>11C</td><td>PR D83 032007</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>11D</td><td>PR D83 051101</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>11F</td><td>PR D83 052011</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>11K</td><td>PR D83 091101</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>11L</td><td>PR D83 091101</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>GULER</td><td>11</td><td>PL D83 032005</td><td>H. Guler et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HORII</td><td>11</td><td>PL 106 231803</td><td>Y. Horii et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>11A</td><td>PR D84 012001</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>11D</td><td>PR D84 012002</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>11I</td><td>PR D84 092007</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SAHOO</td><td>11A</td><td>PR D84 071101</td><td>H. Sahoo et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SEON</td><td>11</td><td>PR D84 071106</td><td>O. Seon et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>VINOKUROVA</td><td>11</td><td>PL B706 139</td><td>A. Vinokurova et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>10A</td><td>PR D81 031105</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>10</td><td>PL 104 011802</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>10D</td><td>PR D83 052009</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>10E</td><td>PR D81 051101</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BOZEK</td><td>9</td><td>PR D82 072005</td><td>A. BOZEK et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>10A</td><td>PR D82 011502</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>10B</td><td>PR D82 011101</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>10F</td><td>PR 106 121001</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>10G</td><td>PR D82 072006</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>10H</td><td>PR D82 072006</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HARA</td><td>10</td><td>PR D82 112002</td><td>K. Hara et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LIBBY</td><td>10</td><td>PR D82 112006</td><td>J. Libby et al.</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>POLUEKTOV</td><td>10</td><td>PR D81 112002</td><td>A. Poluektov et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SAKAI</td><td>10</td><td>PR D82 091104</td><td>K. Sakai et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>WEDD</td><td>10</td><td>PR D81 111104</td><td>R. Wedd et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>10C</td><td>PL D77 071104</td><td>V.M. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CME Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>09Y</td><td>PR D79 111102</td><td>A.Bazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABULENCIA</td><td>09</td><td>PR D79 112003</td><td>A. Abulencia et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09</td><td>PR D79 091110</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09A</td><td>PR D79 012002</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09A</td><td>PR D79 112001</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09B</td><td>PR D79 112004</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AF</td><td>PR D80 051101</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AJ</td><td>PR D80 092001</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09G</td><td>PR 102 141802</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>PR D79 052005</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09J</td><td>PR D79 051101</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L</td><td>PR D79 072006</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09Q</td><td>PR D79 052011</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09R</td><td>PR D79 072003</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09S</td><td>PR D79 092002</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>PRL 102 091803</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>EPAPS Document No.</td><td>09V</td><td>PR D79 091101</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09V</td><td>PRL 103 051803</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHANG</td><td>09Y</td><td>PR D79 052006</td><td>Y.-W. Chang et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHEN</td><td>09C</td><td>PR D80 111103</td><td>C. Chen et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LIU</td><td>09C</td><td>PR D79 071102</td><td>C. Liu et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>PRL 103 171801</td><td>J.-T. Wei et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>09W</td><td>PR D80 052005</td><td>J. Wieczynski et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV...</td><td>08O</td><td>PRL 100 211802</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADACH</td><td>08P</td><td>PR D77 091101</td><td>I. Adachi et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAJ</td><td>08A</td><td>PR D77 0911101</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AA</td><td>PR D77 111102</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AB</td><td>PR D78 012006</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AD</td><td>PR D77 091110</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AG</td><td>PR D78 011104</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AH</td><td>PR D78 011107</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>PR D78 012004</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALSAI</td><td>08AL</td><td>PR D78 034023</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AT</td><td>PRL 100 231803</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AV</td><td>PRL 101 081801</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08B</td><td>PR D77 0911102</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BC</td><td>PR D78 072007</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BD</td><td>PR D78 091101</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BE</td><td>PR D78 091102</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>GODANG</td>
      <td>02</td>
      <td>PRL 88 021802</td>
      <td>R. Godang et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>GORDON</td>
      <td>02</td>
      <td>PL B542 183</td>
      <td>A. Gordon et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LU</td>
      <td>02</td>
      <td>PRL 89 191801</td>
      <td>R.-S. Lu et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>MAHAPATRA</td>
      <td>02</td>
      <td>PRL 88 101803</td>
      <td>R. Mahapatra et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>NISHIDA</td>
      <td>02</td>
      <td>PRL 89 231801</td>
      <td>S. Nishida et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>01H</td>
      <td>PRL 87 101801</td>
      <td>K. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>01I</td>
      <td>PRL 87 111801</td>
      <td>K. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>01K</td>
      <td>PRL D64 071101</td>
      <td>K. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>01L</td>
      <td>PRL 87 161601</td>
      <td>K. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>01M</td>
      <td>PL B517 309</td>
      <td>K. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALEXANDER</td>
      <td>01B</td>
      <td>PRL D64 092001</td>
      <td>J.P. Alexander et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AMMAR</td>
      <td>01B</td>
      <td>PRL 87 271801</td>
      <td>R. Ammar et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ANDERSON</td>
      <td>01B</td>
      <td>PRL 87 181803</td>
      <td>S. Anderson et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AUBERT</td>
      <td>01D</td>
      <td>PRL 87 151801</td>
      <td>B. Aubert et al.</td>
      <td>(BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AUBERT</td>
      <td>01E</td>
      <td>PRL 87 151802</td>
      <td>B. Aubert et al.</td>
      <td>(BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AUBERT</td>
      <td>01F</td>
      <td>PRL 87 201803</td>
      <td>B. Aubert et al.</td>
      <td>(BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AUBERT</td>
      <td>01F</td>
      <td>PRL 87 221802</td>
      <td>B. Aubert et al.</td>
      <td>(BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BARATE</td>
      <td>01E</td>
      <td>EPJ C19 213</td>
      <td>R. Barate et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BRIERE</td>
      <td>01</td>
      <td>PRL 86 3718</td>
      <td>R.A. Biere et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BROWDER</td>
      <td>01</td>
      <td>PRL 86 2950</td>
      <td>T.E. Browder et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>EDWARDS</td>
      <td>01</td>
      <td>PRL 86 30</td>
      <td>K.W. Edwards et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>GRITSAN</td>
      <td>01</td>
      <td>PRL D64 077501</td>
      <td>A. Gritsan et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>RICCHI</td>
      <td>01</td>
      <td>PRL D63 031103</td>
      <td>S.J. Richichi et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABBIENDI</td>
      <td>00B</td>
      <td>PL B476 233</td>
      <td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>00C</td>
      <td>PRL D62 071101</td>
      <td>K. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(SLD Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AHMED</td>
      <td>00B</td>
      <td>PRL D62 112003</td>
      <td>S. Ahmed et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ANASTASSOV</td>
      <td>00</td>
      <td>PRL 84 1393</td>
      <td>A. Anastassov et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BARATE</td>
      <td>00R</td>
      <td>PL B492 275</td>
      <td>R. Barate et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BEHRENS</td>
      <td>00</td>
      <td>PRL D61 052001</td>
      <td>B.H. Behrens et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BONVICINI</td>
      <td>00</td>
      <td>PL B48 5940</td>
      <td>G. Bonvicini et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CHEN</td>
      <td>00</td>
      <td>PRL 85 525</td>
      <td>S. Chen et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>COAN</td>
      <td>00</td>
      <td>PRL 84 5283</td>
      <td>T.E. Coan et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CRONIN-HEN...</td>
      <td>00</td>
      <td>PL B49 515</td>
      <td>D. Cronin-Hennessy et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CSORNA</td>
      <td>00</td>
      <td>PRL D61 111101</td>
      <td>S.E. Csorna et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>JESSOP</td>
      <td>00</td>
      <td>PL P 281 2881</td>
      <td>C.P. Jessop et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>RICCHI</td>
      <td>00</td>
      <td>PL P 52 8520</td>
      <td>S.J. Richichi et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABBIENDI</td>
      <td>9J</td>
      <td>EPJ C12 609</td>
      <td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AFFOLDER</td>
      <td>9B</td>
      <td>PRL 83 3378</td>
      <td>T. Affolder et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BARTELT</td>
      <td>99</td>
      <td>PRL 82 3746</td>
      <td>J. Bartelt et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>COAN</td>
      <td>99</td>
      <td>PRL D59 111101</td>
      <td>T.E. Coan et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>98B</td>
      <td>PRL D57 5382</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>98D</td>
      <td>PRL D58 072001</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>98Q</td>
      <td>PRL D58 092002</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACCIARRI</td>
      <td>9S</td>
      <td>PRL B438 417</td>
      <td>M. Acciarr et al.</td>
      <td>(L3 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ANASTASSOV</td>
      <td>98</td>
      <td>PRL 80 4127</td>
      <td>A. Anastassov et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ATHANAS</td>
      <td>98</td>
      <td>PRL 80 5493</td>
      <td>M. Athanas et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BARATE</td>
      <td>98B</td>
      <td>EPJ C4 387</td>
      <td>R. Barate et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BEHRENS</td>
      <td>98</td>
      <td>PRL 80 3710</td>
      <td>B.H. Behrens et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BERGFIELD</td>
      <td>98</td>
      <td>PRL 81 272</td>
      <td>T. Bergfeld et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BRANDENB...</td>
      <td>98</td>
      <td>PRL 80 2762</td>
      <td>G. Brandenbrug et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CAPRINI</td>
      <td>98</td>
      <td>NP B530 153</td>
      <td>I. Capri, L. Lellouch, M. Neubert</td>
      <td>(BCIP, CERN)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>GODANG</td>
      <td>98</td>
      <td>PRL 80 3456</td>
      <td>R. Godang et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>97J</td>
      <td>PRL 79 590</td>
      <td>K. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(SLD Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACCIARRI</td>
      <td>97F</td>
      <td>PRL B396 327</td>
      <td>M. Acciarr et al.</td>
      <td>(L3 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ARTUSO</td>
      <td>97</td>
      <td>PRL B399 321</td>
      <td>M. Artuso et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ATHANAS</td>
      <td>97</td>
      <td>PRL 79 2208</td>
      <td>M. Athanas et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BROWDER</td>
      <td>97</td>
      <td>PRL D56 11</td>
      <td>T. Browder et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>FU</td>
      <td>97</td>
      <td>PRL 79 3125</td>
      <td>X. Fu et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>JESSOP</td>
      <td>97</td>
      <td>PRL 79 4533</td>
      <td>C.P. Jessop et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>96B</td>
      <td>PRL D53 3496</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>96C</td>
      <td>PRL 76 4462</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>96H</td>
      <td>PRL 76 2015</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>96L</td>
      <td>PRL 76 4675</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>96Q</td>
      <td>PRL D54 6596</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>96F</td>
      <td>PRL 77 5176</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ADAM</td>
      <td>96D</td>
      <td>ZPHY C72 207</td>
      <td>W. Adam et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALEXANDER</td>
      <td>96T</td>
      <td>PRL 77 5000</td>
      <td>J.P. Alexander et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ASNER</td>
      <td>96</td>
      <td>PRL D53 1039</td>
      <td>D.M. Asner et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BARISH</td>
      <td>96B</td>
      <td>PRL 76 1570</td>
      <td>B.C. Barish et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BERGFIELD</td>
      <td>96B</td>
      <td>PRL 77 4503</td>
      <td>T. Bergfeld et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BISHAI</td>
      <td>96</td>
      <td>PRL 81 286</td>
      <td>M. Bishal et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>96J</td>
      <td>ZPHY C71 31</td>
      <td>D. Buskuli et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>GIBAUT</td>
      <td>96</td>
      <td>PRL D53 4734</td>
      <td>D. Gibaut et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>PDG</td>
      <td>96</td>
      <td>PRL D54 1</td>
      <td>R. M. Barnett et al.</td>
      <td>(PDG Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABREU</td>
      <td>95N</td>
      <td>PL B357 255</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABREU</td>
      <td>95Q</td>
      <td>ZPHY C68 13</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ADAM</td>
      <td>95</td>
      <td>ZPHY C68 363</td>
      <td>W. Adam et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AKERS</td>
      <td>95T</td>
      <td>ZPHY C67 379</td>
      <td>R. Akers et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>95D</td>
      <td>PL B353 554</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALEXANDER</td>
      <td>95</td>
      <td>PL B341 435</td>
      <td>J. Alexander et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Also</td>
      <td>95</td>
      <td>PL B347 469 (errat.)</td>
      <td>J. Alexander et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ARTUSO</td>
      <td>95</td>
      <td>PRL 75 785</td>
      <td>M. Artuso et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BARISH</td>
      <td>95</td>
      <td>PR D51 1014</td>
      <td>B.C. Barish et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>95</td>
      <td>PL B343 444</td>
      <td>D. Buskuli et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>94D</td>
      <td>PRL 72 3456</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALAM</td>
      <td>94</td>
      <td>PRL D50 43</td>
      <td>M.S. Alam et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>94D</td>
      <td>PL B335 526</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ATHANAS</td>
      <td>94</td>
      <td>PRL 73 3503</td>
      <td>M. Athanas et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Also</td>
      <td>94</td>
      <td>PRL 74 3090 (errat.)</td>
      <td>M. Athanas et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>PDG</td>
      <td>94</td>
      <td>PR D50 1173</td>
      <td>L. Montant et al.</td>
      <td>(CERN, LBL, BOST+)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>STONE</td>
      <td>94</td>
      <td>HEPSY 93-11</td>
      <td>S. Stone</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td colspan="5">Published in B Decays, 2nd Edition, World Scientific, Singapore</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABREU</td>
      <td>93D</td>
      <td>ZPHY C57 181</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABREU</td>
      <td>93G</td>
      <td>PL B312 253</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACTON</td>
      <td>93C</td>
      <td>PL B307 247</td>
      <td>P.D. Acton et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>93E</td>
      <td>ZPHY C60 11</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALEXANDER</td>
      <td>93B</td>
      <td>PL B319 365</td>
      <td>R. Alexander et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AMMAR</td>
      <td>93</td>
      <td>PRL 71 674</td>
      <td>J. Ammar et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BEAN</td>
      <td>93B</td>
      <td>PRL 70 2681</td>
      <td>A. Bean et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>93D</td>
      <td>PL B307 194</td>
      <td>D. Buskuli et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Also</td>
      <td>93</td>
      <td>PL B325 537 (errat.)</td>
      <td>D. Buskuli et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>SANGHERA</td>
      <td>93</td>
      <td>PR D47 791</td>
      <td>S. Sanghera et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>92C</td>
      <td>PRL B275 195</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>92E</td>
      <td>PL B277 209</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>92G</td>
      <td>ZPHY C54 1</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BORTOLETTO</td>
      <td>92</td>
      <td>PL D45 21</td>
      <td>D. Bortoletto et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>92G</td>
      <td>PL B295 396</td>
      <td>D. Buskuli et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>91E</td>
      <td>PL B254 268</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>91C</td>
      <td>PL B255 297</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>91E</td>
      <td>PL B262 148</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BERKELMAN</td>
      <td>91</td>
      <td>ARNPS 41</td>
      <td>K. Berkelman, S. Stone</td>
      <td>(CORN, SYRA)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td colspan="5">"Decays of B Mesons"</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>FULTON</td>
      <td>91</td>
      <td>PR D43 651</td>
      <td>R. Fulton et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>90B</td>
      <td>PL B241 278</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>90J</td>
      <td>ZPHY C48 543</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ANTREASYAN</td>
      <td>90B</td>
      <td>ZPHY C48 553</td>
      <td>D. Antreasyan et al.</td>
      <td>(Crystal Ball Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BORTOLETTO</td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>PRL 64 2117</td>
      <td>D. Bortoletto et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Also</td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>PRL D45 21</td>
      <td>D. Bortoletto et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>WEIR</td>
      <td>90B</td>
      <td>Mark II Collab.</td>
      <td>A.J. Weir et al.</td>
      <td>(Mark II Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>89G</td>
      <td>PL B229 304</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AVERY</td>
      <td>89B</td>
      <td>PL B223 470</td>
      <td>P. Avery et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>BEBEK</td>
      <td>89</td>
      <td>PRL 62 8</td>
      <td>C. Bebek et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BORTOLETTO</td>
      <td>89</td>
      <td>PRL 62 2436</td>
      <td>D. Bortoletto et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>88F</td>
      <td>PL B209 119</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>88K</td>
      <td>PL B215 424</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>87C</td>
      <td>PL B185 218</td>
      <td>H. Albrecht et al.</td>
      <td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>87D</td>
      <td>PL B199 451</td>
      <td>P. Avery et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>87</td>
      <td>PL B103 429</td>
      <td>P. Avery et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BEBEK</td>
      <td>87</td>
      <td>PR D36 1289</td>
      <td>C. Bebek et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ALAM</td>
      <td>86</td>
      <td>PR D34 3279</td>
      <td>M.S. Alam et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>PDG</td>
      <td>86</td>
      <td>PR 170B 1</td>
      <td>M. Aguilar-Benitez et al.</td>
      <td>(CERN, CIT+)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>GILES</td>
      <td>84</td>
      <td>PR D30 2279</td>
      <td>R. Giles et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

$$B^0 \qquad I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(0^{-})$$

Quantum numbers not measured. Values shown are quark-model predictions.

See also the $B^{\pm}/B^0$ ADMIXTURE and $B^{\pm}/B^0/B_S^0$ b-baryon ADMIXTURE sections.

See the Note "Production and Decay of b-flavored Hadrons" at the beginning of the $B^{\pm}$ Particle Listings and the Note on "$B^0-B^0$ Mixing" near the end of the $B^0$ Particle Listings.

## $B^0$ MASS

The fit uses $m_{B^+}$, ($m_{B^0} - m_{B^+}$), and $m_{B^0}$ to determine $m_{B^+}$, $m_{B^0}$, and the mass difference.

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (MeV)</th>
      <th>EVTS</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td colspan="5"><strong>5279.72&plusmn;0.08 OUR FIT</strong></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td colspan="5"><strong>5279.63&plusmn;0.20 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>5279.74&plusmn;0.30&plusmn;0.10</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>1 AAJ</td>
      <td>19u LHCB</td>
      <td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>5279.6 &plusmn; 0.2 &plusmn; 1.0</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>2 AAD</td>
      <td>13u ATLS</td>
      <td>pp at 7 TeV</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>5279.58&plusmn;0.15&plusmn;0.28</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>3 AAJ</td>
      <td>12e LHCB</td>
      <td>pp at 7 TeV</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>5279.63&plusmn;0.53&plusmn;0.33</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>4 ACOSTA</td>
      <td>06 CDF</td>
      <td>p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>5279.1 &plusmn; 0.7 &plusmn; 0.3</td>
      <td>135</td>
      <td>5 CSORNA</td>
      <td>00 CLE2</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>5281.3 &plusmn; 2.2 &plusmn; 1.4</td>
      <td>51</td>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>96b CDF</td>
      <td>p&pi; at 1.8 TeV</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

1. Uses $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi p\bar{p}$ decays.

2. Measured with $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi (\mu^+\mu^-) K_S^0 (\pi^+\pi^-)$ decays.

3. Uses $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K^0$ fully reconstructed decays.

4. Uses exclusively reconstructed final states containing a $J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

5. CSORNA 00 uses fully reconstructed 135 $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi (\mu^+\mu^-) K_S^0$ events and invariant masses without beam constraint.

6. ALBRECHT 90J assumes 10580 for $\Upsilon(4S)$ mass. Supersedes ALBRECHT 87C and ALBRECHT 87D.

7. Found using fully reconstructed decays with $J/\psi$. ALBRECHT 87D assume $m_{\Upsilon(4S)} = 10577$ MeV.

## $m_{B^0H} - m_{B^0L}$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (MeV)</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td colspan="4"><strong>0.31&plusmn;0.05 OUR FIT</strong></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td colspan="4"><strong>0.33&plusmn;0.05 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>0.57&plusmn;0.49&plusmn;0.10</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>1 SIRUNYAN</td>
      <td>18DF CMS</td>
      <td>pp at 8 TeV</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>0.20&plusmn;0.17&plusmn;0.11</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>1 AAJ</td>
      <td>12E LHCB</td>
      <td>pp at 7 TeV</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>0.33&plusmn;0.05&plusmn;0.03</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>2 AUBERT</td>
      <td>08AF BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>0.53&plusmn;0.67&plusmn;0.14</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>1 ACOSTA</td>
      <td>06 CDF</td>
      <td>p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>0.41&plusmn;0.25&plusmn;0.19</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>ALAM</td>
      <td>94 CLE2</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>-0.4&plusmn;0.6&plusmn;0.5</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>BORTOLETTO</td>
      <td>90J ARG</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>-0.9&plusmn;1.2&plusmn;0.5</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>87D ARG</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>2.0&plusmn;1.1&plusmn;0.3</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>3 BEBEK</td>
      <td>87 CLEO</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

1. Uses exclusively reconstructed final states containing a $J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-$ decay.

2. Uses the $B$-momentum distributions in the $e^+e^-$ rest frame.

3. BEBEK 87 actually measure the difference between half of $E_{cm}$ and the $B^{\pm}$ or $B^0$ mass, so the $m_{B^0} - m_{B^{\pm}}$ is more accurate. Assume $m_{\Upsilon(4S)} = 10580$ MeV.

## $m_{B^0H} - m_{B^0L}$

See the $B^0-B^0$ MIXING PARAMETERS section near the end of these $B^0$ Listings.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

## B⁰ MEAN LIFE

See $B^{\pm}/B^0/B_S^0$/b-baryon ADMIXTURE section for data on B-hadron mean life averaged over species of bottom particles.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>1.517 &pm; 0.004 OUR EVALUATION</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.499 &pm; 0.013 &pm; 0.008</td><td>1</td><td>ABUDINEN</td><td>23D BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.515 &pm; 0.005 &pm; 0.006</td><td>2</td><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>18BY CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.534 &pm; 0.019 &pm; 0.021</td><td>3</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>15A D0</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.499 &pm; 0.013 &pm; 0.005</td><td>4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.524 &pm; 0.006 &pm; 0.004</td><td>5</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.524 &pm; 0.011 &pm; 0.004</td><td>6</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14R LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.509 &pm; 0.012 &pm; 0.018</td><td>7</td><td>AAD</td><td>13U ATLS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.508 &pm; 0.025 &pm; 0.043</td><td>4</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>12U D0</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.507 &pm; 0.010 &pm; 0.008</td><td>8</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11 CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.414 &pm; 0.018 &pm; 0.034</td><td>9</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>09E D0</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.504 &pm; 0.013<sup>+0.018</sup><sub>-0.013</sub></td><td>10</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06G BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.534 &pm; 0.008 &pm; 0.010</td><td>11</td><td>ABE</td><td>05B BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.531 &pm; 0.021 &pm; 0.031</td><td>12</td><td>ABDALLAH</td><td>04E DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.523<sup>+0.024</sup><sub>-0.023</sub></td><td>13</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03C BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.533 &pm; 0.034 &pm; 0.038</td><td>14</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.497 &pm; 0.073 &pm; 0.032</td><td>15</td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>02C CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.529 &pm; 0.012 &pm; 0.029</td><td>16</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>02H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.546 &pm; 0.032 &pm; 0.022</td><td>17</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>01F BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.541 &pm; 0.028 &pm; 0.023</td><td>16</td><td>ABBIENDI,G</td><td>00B OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.518 &pm; 0.053 &pm; 0.034</td><td>18</td><td>BARATE</td><td>00R ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.523 &pm; 0.057 &pm; 0.053</td><td>19</td><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>99J OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.474 &pm; 0.039<sup>+0.052</sup><sub>-0.051</sub></td><td>18</td><td>ABE</td><td>98Q CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.52 &pm; 0.06 &pm; 0.04</td><td>19</td><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>98S L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.64 &pm; 0.08 &pm; 0.08</td><td>19</td><td>ABE</td><td>97J SLD</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.532 &pm; 0.041 &pm; 0.040</td><td>20</td><td>ABREU</td><td>97F DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.25<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.13</sub> &pm; 0.05</td><td>121</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96J ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.49<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.15</sub> &pm; 0.08</td><td>21</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96J ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.61<sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.13</sub> &pm; 0.08</td><td>18,22</td><td>ABREU</td><td>95Q DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.63 &pm; 0.14 &pm; 0.13</td><td>23</td><td>ADAM</td><td>95 DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.53 &pm; 0.12 &pm; 0.08</td><td>18,24</td><td>AKERS</td><td>95T OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.501<sup>+0.078</sup><sub>-0.074</sub></td><td>4</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>07S D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 12U</td></tr><tr><td>1.524 &pm; 0.030 &pm; 0.016</td><td>4</td><td>ABULENCIA</td><td>07A CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 11</td></tr><tr><td>1.473<sup>+0.052</sup><sub>-0.050</sub></td><td>9</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>05B D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 05W</td></tr><tr><td>1.40<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.10</sub></td><td>4</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>05C D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 07S</td></tr><tr><td>1.530 &pm; 0.043 &pm; 0.023</td><td>9</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>05W D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 09E</td></tr><tr><td>1.54 &pm; 0.05 &pm; 0.02</td><td>25</td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 11</td></tr><tr><td>1.554 &pm; 0.030 &pm; 0.019</td><td>17</td><td>ABE</td><td>02H BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 05B</td></tr><tr><td>1.58 &pm; 0.09 &pm; 0.02</td><td>15</td><td>ABE</td><td>98B CDF</td><td>Repl. by ACOSTA 02C</td></tr><tr><td>1.54 &pm; 0.08 &pm; 0.06</td><td>18</td><td>ABE</td><td>96C CDF</td><td>Repl. by ABE 98Q</td></tr><tr><td>1.55 &pm; 0.06 &pm; 0.03</td><td>26</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96J ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.61 &pm; 0.07 &pm; 0.04</td><td>18</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96J ALEP</td><td>Repl. by BARATE 00R</td></tr><tr><td>1.62 &pm; 0.12</td><td>27</td><td>ADAM</td><td>95 DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.57 &pm; 0.18 &pm; 0.08</td><td>15</td><td>ABE</td><td>94D CDF</td><td>Repl. by ABE 98B</td></tr><tr><td>1.17<sup>+0.29</sup><sub>-0.23</sub></td><td>96</td><td>ABREU</td><td>93D DLPH</td><td>Sup. by ABREU 95Q</td></tr><tr><td>1.55 &pm; 0.25 &pm; 0.18</td><td>76</td><td>ABREU</td><td>93G DLPH</td><td>Sup. by ADAM 95</td></tr><tr><td>1.51<sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.23</sub> &pm; 0.12</td><td>78</td><td>ACTON</td><td>93C OPAL</td><td>Sup. by AKERS 95T</td></tr><tr><td>1.52<sup>+0.20</sup><sub>-0.18</sub> &pm; 0.07</td><td>77</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>93D ALEP</td><td>Sup. by BUSKULIC 96J</td></tr><tr><td>1.20<sup>+0.52</sup><sub>-0.36</sub> &pm; 0.16</td><td>15</td><td>WAGNER</td><td>90 MRK2</td><td>E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 29 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.82<sup>+0.57</sup><sub>-0.37</sub> &pm; 0.27</td><td>29</td><td>AVERILL</td><td>89 HRS</td><td>E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 29 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Measured using $B^0 \to D^*(\to \pi^+)\pi^+$ decays.

2. Measured using $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*(892)^0$ and $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ decays.

3. Measured using $B^0 \to D^-\mu^+\nu X$ decays.

4. Measured mean life using $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ decays.

5. Measured using $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*0$ decays.

6. Measured using $B^0 \to K^+\pi^-$ decays.

7. Measured with $B^0 \to J/\psi(\mu^+\mu^-) K_S^*(\pi^+\pi^-)$ decays.

8. Measured mean life using fully reconstructed decays ($J/\psi K^*(\to \pi^+)\pi^+$).

9. Measured mean life using $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*0$ decays.

10. Measured using a simultaneous fit of the $B^0$ lifetime and $\bar{B}^0$ $B^0$ oscillation frequency $\Delta m_d$ in the partially reconstructed $B^0 \to D^*-\ell\nu$ decays.

11. Measurement performed using a combined fit of CP-violation, mixing and lifetimes.

12. Measurement performed using an inclusive reconstruction and B flavor identification technique.

13. AUBERT 03C uses a sample of approximately 14,000 exclusively reconstructed $B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\ell\nu$ and simultaneously measures the lifetime and oscillation frequency.

14. Measurement performed with decays $B^0 \to D^*-\pi^+$ and $B^0 \to D^*-\rho^+$ using a partial reconstruction technique.

15. Measured mean life using fully reconstructed decays.

16. Data analyzed using partially reconstructed $\bar{B}^0 \to D^+\ell^-\nu\tau$ decays.

17. Events are selected in which one B meson is fully reconstructed while the second B meson is reconstructed inclusively.

18. Data analyzed using $D/D^*\ell X$ event vertices.

19. Data analyzed using charge of secondary vertex.

20. Data analyzed using inclusive $D/D^*\ell X$.

21. Measured mean life using partially reconstructed $D^*-\pi^+X$ vertices.

22. ABREU 95Q assumes $B(B^0 \to D^*-\ell^+\nu\ell^-) = 3.2 \pm 1.7\%$.

23. Data analyzed using vertex-charge technique to tag B charge.

24. AKERS 95T assumes $B(B^0 \to D_S^*(\to D^*)D^*(\to S^*) = 5.0 \pm 0.9\%$ to find $B^+/B^0$ yield.

25. Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of $B^0_d \to J/\psi K^*0$ decays.

26. Combined result of $D/D^*\ell X$ analysis, fully reconstructed B analysis, and partially reconstructed $D^*-\pi^+X$ analysis.

27. Combined ABREU 95Q and ADAM 95 result.

28. WAGNER 90 tagged $B^0$ mesons by their decays into $D^*-e^+\nu$ and $D^*-\mu^+\nu$ where the $D^-$ is tagged by its decay into $\pi^-\bar{D}^0$.

29. AVERILL 89 is an estimate of the $B^0$ mean lifetime assuming that $B^0 \to D^*++X$ always.

## $\tau_{B^0}/\tau_{\bar{B}^0}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.000 &pm; 0.008 &pm; 0.009</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Measured using $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*0$ decays.

## MEAN LIFE RATIO $\tau_{B^+}/\tau_{\bar{B}^0}$

### $\tau_{B^+}/\tau_{\bar{B}^0}$ (direct measurements)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>1.076 &pm; 0.004 OUR EVALUATION</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.074 &pm; 0.005 &pm; 0.003</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.088 &pm; 0.009 &pm; 0.004</td><td>2</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11 CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.080 &pm; 0.016 &pm; 0.014</td><td>3</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>05D D0</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.066 &pm; 0.008 &pm; 0.008</td><td>4</td><td>ABE</td><td>05B BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.060 &pm; 0.021 &pm; 0.024</td><td>5</td><td>ABDALLAH</td><td>04E DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.093 &pm; 0.066 &pm; 0.028</td><td>6</td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>02C CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.082 &pm; 0.026 &pm; 0.012</td><td>7</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>01F BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.085 &pm; 0.059 &pm; 0.018</td><td>8</td><td>BARATE</td><td>00R ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.079 &pm; 0.064 &pm; 0.041</td><td>8</td><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>99J OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.110 &pm; 0.056 &pm; 0.033</td><td>3</td><td>ABE</td><td>98Q CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.09 &pm; 0.07 &pm; 0.03</td><td>8</td><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>98S L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.01 &pm; 0.07 &pm; 0.06</td><td>8</td><td>ABE</td><td>97J SLD</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.27<sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.19</sub> &pm; 0.03</td><td>6</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96J ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.00<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.15</sub> &pm; 0.10</td><td>3,9</td><td>ABREU</td><td>95Q DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.06<sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.11</sub> &pm; 0.10</td><td>10</td><td>ADAM</td><td>95 DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.99 &pm; 0.14<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.04</sub></td><td>3,11</td><td>AKERS</td><td>95T OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.091 &pm; 0.023 &pm; 0.014</td><td>7</td><td>ABE</td><td>02H BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 05b</td></tr><tr><td>1.06 &pm; 0.07 &pm; 0.02</td><td>6</td><td>ABE</td><td>98B CDF</td><td>Repl. by ACOSTA 02C</td></tr><tr><td>1.01 &pm; 0.11 &pm; 0.02</td><td>3</td><td>ABE</td><td>96C CDF</td><td>Repl. by ABE 98Q</td></tr><tr><td>1.03 &pm; 0.08 &pm; 0.02</td><td>12</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96J ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.98 &pm; 0.08 &pm; 0.03</td><td>3</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96J ALEP</td><td>Repl. by BARATE 00R</td></tr><tr><td>1.02 &pm; 0.16 &pm; 0.05</td><td>269</td><td>ABE</td><td>94D CDF</td><td>Repl. by ABE 98b</td></tr><tr><td>1.11<sup>+0.51</sup><sub>-0.39</sub> &pm; 0.11</td><td>188</td><td>ABREU</td><td>93D DLPH</td><td>Sup. by ABREU 95Q</td></tr><tr><td>1.01<sup>+0.29</sup><sub>-0.22</sub> &pm; 0.12</td><td>253</td><td>ABREU</td><td>93G DLPH</td><td>Sup. by ADAM 95</td></tr><tr><td>1.0<sup>+0.33</sup><sub>-0.25</sub> &pm; 0.08</td><td>130</td><td>ACTON</td><td>93C OPAL</td><td>Sup. by AKERS 95T</td></tr><tr><td>0.96<sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.15</sub> &pm; 0.12</td><td>154</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>93D ALEP</td><td>Sup. by BUSKULIC 96J</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Measured using $B \to J/\psi K^*(\to \pi^+)\pi^+$ decays.

2. Measured mean life using fully reconstructed decays ($J/\psi K^*(\to \pi^+)\pi^+$).

3. Data analyzed using $D/D^*\mu X$ vertices.

4. Measurement performed using a combined fit of CP-violation, mixing and lifetimes.

5. Measurement performed using an inclusive reconstruction and B flavor identification technique.

6. Measured using fully reconstructed decays.

7. Events are selected in which one B meson is fully reconstructed while the second B meson is reconstructed inclusively.

8. Data analyzed using charge of secondary vertex.

9. ABREU 95Q assumes $B(B^0 \to D^*-\ell^+\nu\ell^-) = 3.2 \pm 1.7\%$.

10. Data analyzed using vertex-charge technique to tag B charge.

11. AKERS 95T assumes $B(B^0 \to D_S^*(\to D^*)D^*(\to S^*) = 5.0 \pm 0.9\%$ to find $B^+/B^0$ yield.

12. Combined result of $D/D^*\ell X$ analysis and fully reconstructed B analysis.

## $\tau_{B^+}/\tau_{\bar{B}^0}$ (inferred from branching fractions)

These measurements are inferred from the branching fractions for semileptonic decay or other spectator-dominated decays by assuming that the rates for such decays are equal for $B^0$ and $B^+$. We do not use measurements which assume equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ because of the large uncertainty in the production ratio.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%<br>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.07 &pm; 0.04</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.07 &pm; 0.04 &pm; 0.03</td><td></td><td>URQUIJO</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.067 &pm; 0.041 &pm; 0.033</td><td></td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06Y BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.95</td><td>+0.117</td><td>±0.091</td><td>1 ARTUSO</td><td>97</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.15</td><td>±0.17</td><td>±0.06</td><td>2 JESSOP</td><td>97</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.93</td><td>±0.18</td><td>±0.12</td><td>3 ATHANAS</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Sup. by ARTUSO 97</td></tr><tr><td>0.91</td><td>±0.27</td><td>±0.21</td><td>4 ALBRECHT</td><td>92C</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.0</td><td>±0.4</td><td></td><td>29</td><td>4,5 ALBRECHT</td><td>92G</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.89</td><td>±0.19</td><td>±0.13</td><td>4 FULTON</td><td>91</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.00</td><td>±0.23</td><td>±0.14</td><td>4 ALBRECHT</td><td>89L</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.49</td><td>to 2.3</td><td>90</td><td>6 BEAN</td><td>87B</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ARTUSO 97 uses partial reconstruction of B → D*ℓν<sub>ℓ</sub> and independent of B⁰ and B⁺ production fraction.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³ATHANAS 94 uses events tagged by fully reconstructed B⁻ decays and partially or fully reconstructed B⁰ decays.

⁴Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺.

⁵ALBRECHT 92G data analyzed using B → D<sub>S</sub> D̄, D<sub>S</sub>D*, D*<sub>S</sub>D̄, D*<sub>S</sub>D* events.

⁶BEAN 87B assume the fraction of B⁰D⁰ events at the T(4S) is 0.41.

$\Delta\Gamma_{B^0}/\Gamma_{B^0}$

$\Gamma_{B^0}$ and $\Delta\Gamma_{B^0}$ are the decay rate average and difference between two

$B^0_{d}$ CP eigenstates (light – heavy). The $\lambda_{CP}$ characterizes $B^0$ and $\bar{B}^0$ decays to states of charmonium plus $K_L^0$, see the review on “CP Violation” in the reviews section.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>CL<sub>1%</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.1 ±1.0 OUR EVALUATION</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.1 ±1.0 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>3.4 ±2.3 ±2.4</td><td>1 SIRUNYAN</td><td>18BY</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>- 0.1 ±1.1 ±0.9</td><td>2 AABOUD</td><td>16G</td><td>ATLS</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>- 4.4 ±2.5 ±1.1</td><td>3 AAJ</td><td>14E</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.7 ±1.8 ±1.1</td><td>4 HIGUCHI</td><td>12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.8 ±3.7 ±1.8</td><td>5 AUBERT, B</td><td>04C</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0 ±9</td><td>6 ABDALLAH</td><td>03B</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.50 ±1.38</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>14</td><td>D0</td><td>ρp̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 80</td><td>95</td><td>7 BEHRENS</td><td>00B</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Measured using $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*(892)0$ and $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ decays, and assuming $\beta = 21.9 \pm 0.7$ degrees.

²Measured from the ratio of decay time distributions of $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ and $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*0$ decays.

³Measured using the effective lifetimes of $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ and $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*0$ decays.

⁴Reports $-\Delta\Gamma_d/\Gamma_d$ using $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$, $J/\psi K_L^0$, $D^-, D^*-\pi^+, D^*-\rho^+$, and $D^*-\ell^+\nu$ decays.

⁵Corresponds to 90% confidence range [-0.084, 0.068].

⁶Used the measured $\tau_{B^0} = 1.55 \pm 0.03$ ps. Corresponds to an upper limit of < 0.18 at 95% C.L.

⁷BEHRENS 00B uses high-momentum lepton tags and partially reconstructed $\bar{B}^0 \to D^+\pi^-, \rho^-$ decays to determine the flavor of the B meson. Assumes $\Delta_{md}=0.478 \pm 0.018 \text{ ps}^{-1}$ and $\tau_{B^0}=1.548 \pm 0.032$ ps.

B⁰ DECAY MODES

$\bar{B}^0$ modes are charge conjugates of the modes below. Reactions indicate the weak decay vertex and do not include mixing. Modes which do not identify the charge state of the B are listed in the $B^\pm/B^0$ ADMIXTURE mode.

The branching fractions listed below assume 50% $B^0\bar{B}^0$ and 50% $B^+B^-$ production at the T(4S). We have attempted to bring older measurements up to date by rescaling their assumed T(4S) production ratio to 50:50 and their assumed $D, D_S, D^*, \text{ and } \psi$ branching ratios to current values whenever this would affect our averages and best limits significantly.

Indentation is used to indicate a subchannel of a previous reaction. All resonant subchannels have been corrected for resonance branching fractions to the final state so the sum of the subchannel branching fractions can exceed that of the final state.

For inclusive branching fractions, e.g., $B \to D^\pm X$, the values usually are multiplicities, not branching fractions. They can be greater than one.

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>f</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Scale factor/<br>Confidence level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub> X</td><td>[a] (10.33 &pm; 0.28) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> e<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>e</sub> X<sub>e</sub></td><td>(10.1 &pm; 0.4) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub> X<sub>u</sub></td><td>[a] (1.51 &pm; 0.19) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub> D<sup>+</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub> X</td><td>[a] (9.1 &pm; 0.8) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>5</sub> D<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>[a] (2.12 &pm; 0.06) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>6</sub> D<sup>-</sup> &tau;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&tau;</sub></td><td>[a] (9.9 &pm; 2.1) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>7</sub> D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>[a] (4.90 &pm; 0.12) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>8</sub> D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> e<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>e</sub></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>9</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> &mu;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&mu;</sub></td><td>(1.45 &pm; 0.10) %</td><td>S=1.3</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>10</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> &tau;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&tau;</sub></td><td>(2.3 &pm; 0.5) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>11</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>0</sub> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub> (n &ge; 1)</td><td>[a] (3.64 &pm; 0.20) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>12</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>0</sub> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>[a] &lt; 4.4</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>13</sub></td><td>D<sup>*2</sup><sub>0</sub> (2300)<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub>, D<sup>*2</sup><sub>0</sub> &rarr; D<sup>0</sup><sub>0</sub> &pi;<sup>-</sup></td><td>[a] (1.41 &pm; 0.20) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>S=1.7</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>14</sub></td><td>D<sup>*2</sup><sub>2</sub> (2460)<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub>, D<sup>*2</sup><sub>2</sub> &rarr; D<sup>0</sup><sub>0</sub> &pi;<sup>-</sup></td><td>[a] (1.41 &pm; 0.20) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>S=1.7</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>15</sub></td><td>D<sup>*0</sup><sub>0</sub> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>[a] (5.44 &pm; 0.28) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>16</sub></td><td>D<sub>1</sub>(2420)<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub>, D<sup>-</sup><sub>1</sub> &rarr; D<sup>*0</sup><sub>0</sub> &pi;<sup>-</sup></td><td>[a] (2.85 &pm; 0.25) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>17</sub></td><td>D<sub>1</sub>(2420)<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub>, D<sup>-</sup><sub>1</sub> &rarr; D<sup>-</sup><sub>0</sub> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup></td><td>[a] (1.02 &pm; 0.16) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>18</sub></td><td>D<sup>'</sup><sub>1</sub>(2430)<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub>, D<sup>'-</sup><sub>1</sub> &rarr; D<sup>*0</sup><sub>0</sub> &pi;<sup>-</sup></td><td>[a] (2.5 &pm; 0.6) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>19</sub></td><td>D<sup>*2</sup><sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub>, D<sup>*2</sup><sub>2</sub> &rarr; D<sup>*0</sup><sub>0</sub> &pi;<sup>-</sup></td><td>[a] (6.6 &pm; 1.1) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>20</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup><sub>0</sub> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>[a] (1.45 &pm; 0.22) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>21</sub></td><td>D<sup>*-</sup><sub>0</sub> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>[a] (5.1 &pm; 2.3) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>22</sub></td><td>&rho;<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>[a] (2.94 &pm; 0.21) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>23</sub></td><td>&pi;<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>[a] (1.50 &pm; 0.06) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>24</sub></td><td>&pi;<sup>-</sup> &mu;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&mu;</sub></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>25</sub></td><td>&pi;<sup>-</sup> &tau;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&tau;</sub></td><td>&lt; 2.5</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr></table>

Inclusive modes

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>26</sub></td><td>K<sup>+</sup>X</td><td>(78 &pm; 8) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>27</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup>X</td><td>(8.1 &pm; 1.5) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>28</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup>X</td><td>(47.4 &pm; 2.8) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>29</sub></td><td>D<sup>+</sup>X</td><td>&lt; 3.9</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>30</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>X</td><td>(36.9 &pm; 3.3) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>31</sub></td><td>D<sup>+</sup><sub>S</sub> X</td><td>(10.3 &pm; 2.1) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>32</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup><sub>S</sub> X</td><td>&lt; 2.6</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>33</sub></td><td>&Lambda;<sup>+</sup><sub>C</sub> X</td><td>&lt; 3.1</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>34</sub></td><td>&lambda;<sub>C</sub> X</td><td>(5.0 &pm; 2.1) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>35</sub></td><td>&tau;X</td><td>(95 &pm; 5) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>36</sub></td><td>cX</td><td>(24.6 &pm; 3.1) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>37</sub></td><td>&tau;/cX</td><td>(119 &pm; 6) %</td><td></td></tr></table>

D, D*, or D<sub>S</sub> modes

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>38</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(2.51 &pm; 0.08) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>39</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>&rho;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(7.6 &pm; 1.2) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>40</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>0</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(4.9 &pm; 0.9) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>41</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>(4.5 &pm; 0.7) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>42</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>&omega;&pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(2.8 &pm; 0.6) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>43</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td><td>(2.05 &pm; 0.08) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>44</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>-</sup></td><td>(3.5 &pm; 0.8) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>45</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.1</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>46</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>(8.8 &pm; 1.9) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>47</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(8.8 &pm; 0.5) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>48</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>0</sub> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td><td>(2.66 &pm; 0.07) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>49</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>-</sup></td><td>(6.1 &pm; 0.5) &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>50</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>-</sup></td><td>(6.0 &pm; 0.6) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>51</sub></td><td>(D<sup>-</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>-</sup>) nonresonant</td><td>(3.9 &pm; 1.9) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>52</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>&rho;<sup>0</sup></td><td>(1.1 &pm; 1.0) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>53</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>+</sup></td><td>(6.0 &pm; 3.3) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>54</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>0</sup></td><td>(1.5 &pm; 0.5) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>55</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> &rho;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(6.8 &pm; 0.9) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>56</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>(2.16 &pm; 0.08) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>57</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> K<sup>0</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(3.0 &pm; 0.8) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>58</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>(3.3 &pm; 0.6) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>59</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 4.7</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>60</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>(1.29 &pm; 0.33) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>61</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>-</sup></td><td>(7.21 &pm; 0.29) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>62</sub></td><td>(D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>-</sup>) non-resonant</td><td>(0.0 &pm; 2.5) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>63</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>&rho;<sup>0</sup></td><td>(5.7 &pm; 3.2) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>64</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>+</sup></td><td>(1.30 &pm; 0.27) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>65</sub></td><td>D<sub>1</sub>(2420)<sup>0</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>, D<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub> &rarr; D<sup>0</sup><sub>0</sub></td><td>(1.47 &pm; 0.35) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>66</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>-</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(4.7 &pm; 0.4) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>67</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>-</sup>&pi;<sup>0</sup></td><td>(1.76 &pm; 0.27) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>68</sub></td><td>D<sup>*-</sup>3&pi;<sup>+</sup>&pi;<sup>-</sup></td><td>(4.7 &pm; 0.9) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>69</sub></td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup><sup>-</sup> &omega;&pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(2.46 &pm; 0.18) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>S=1.2</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>70</sub></td><td>D<sub>1</sub>(2430)<sup>0</sup> &omega;, D<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub> &rarr; D<sup>*-</sup>&pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(2.7 &pm; 0.8) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>