Meson Particle Listings

B⁰

<table><tr><td>Γ71</td><td>D<sup>-</sup>* ρ(1450)<sup>+</sup>, ρ<sup>+</sup> → ωπ<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.07<sup>+</sup> <sup>0.40</sup> <sup>0.34</sup> ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ72</td><td>D<sub>1</sub>(2420)<sup>0</sup> ω, D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup>* π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 7.0 ± 2.2 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ73</td><td>D<sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>0</sup> ω, D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup>* π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 4.0 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ74</td><td>D<sup>-</sup>* b<sub>1</sub>(1235)<sup>+</sup>, b<sub>1</sub><sup>+</sup> → ωπ<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ75</td><td>D<sup>-</sup>*<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td><td>[b] ( 1.9 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ76</td><td>D<sub>1</sub>(2420)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>-</sup> →</td><td>( 9.9 <sup>+</sup> <sup>2.0</sup> <sup>2.5</sup> ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ77</td><td>D<sub>1</sub>(2420)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>-</sup> →</td><td>&lt; 3.3 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ78</td><td>D<sup>-</sup>* π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 2.38 ± 0.16 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ79</td><td>D<sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>*-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 7.6 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ80</td><td>D<sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> →</td><td>&lt; 2.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ81</td><td>D<sup>-</sup>* π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 4.9 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ82</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.4 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ83</td><td>D<sup>0</sup>* D<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.9 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ84</td><td>D<sup>-</sup> D<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 2.11 ± 0.18 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ85</td><td>D<sup>+</sup> D<sup>*+</sup> (CP-averaged)</td><td>( 6.1 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ86</td><td>D<sup>-</sup> D<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 7.2 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ87</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>, m(D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup>) > 2.05 GeV</td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ88</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup></td><td>( 8.0 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ89</td><td>D<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ90</td><td>D<sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>-</sup> D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>*-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ91</td><td>D<sub>1</sub>(2600)<sup>-</sup> D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ92</td><td>D<sub>3</sub>(2750)<sup>-</sup> D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup>, D<sub>3</sub><sup>*-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ93</td><td>D<sub>1</sub>(2760)<sup>-</sup> D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>*-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ94</td><td>D<sup>+</sup>(3000)<sup>-</sup> D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup>, D<sub>5</sub><sup>*-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ95</td><td>T<sup>*-</sup><sub>cs0</sub>(2870)<sup>0</sup> D<sup>0</sup></td><td>T<sup>*-</sup><sub>cs0</sub> →</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ96</td><td>D<sup>-</sup> D<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 7.4 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ97</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.77 ± 0.14 ) %</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ98</td><td>D<sub>50</sub>(2317)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>50</sub><sup>-</sup> →</td><td>( 4.2 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ99</td><td>D<sub>50</sub>(2317)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>50</sub><sup>-</sup> → D<sub>5</sub><sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ100</td><td>D<sub>s,J</sub>(2457)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>s,J</sub><sup>-</sup> →</td><td>&lt; 9.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ101</td><td>D<sub>s,J</sub>(2457)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>s,J</sub><sup>-</sup> →</td><td>&lt; 4.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ102</td><td>D<sub>5</sub><sup>-</sup> D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ103</td><td>D<sub>5</sub><sup>-</sup> D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.3 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ104</td><td>D<sup>-</sup>* D<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.4 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ105</td><td>D<sub>50</sub>(2317)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>-</sup>, D<sub>50</sub><sup>*+</sup> →</td><td>( 1.06 ± 0.16 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ106</td><td>D<sub>50</sub>(2317)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>-</sup>, D<sub>50</sub><sup>+</sup> → D<sup>*+</sup> γ</td><td>&lt; 9.5 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ107</td><td>D<sub>50</sub>(2317)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup>, D<sub>50</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td><td>( 1.5 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ108</td><td>D<sub>s,J</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 3.5 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ109</td><td>D<sub>s,J</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>-</sup>, D<sub>s,J</sub><sup>+</sup> → D<sup>+</sup> γ</td><td>( 6.5 <sup>+</sup> <sup>1.7</sup> <sup>-</sup> <sup>1.4</sup> ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ110</td><td>D<sub>s,J</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>-</sup>, D<sub>s,J</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td><td>&lt; 6.0 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ111</td><td>D<sup>*+</sup> γ</td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ112</td><td>D<sub>s,J</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>-</sup>, D<sub>s,J</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td><td>&lt; 3.6 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ113</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> D<sub>s,J</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 9.3 ± 2.2 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ114</td><td>D<sub>s,J</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>*</sup>(2010), D<sub>s,J</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td><td>( 2.3 <sup>+</sup> <sup>0.9</sup> <sup>-</sup> <sup>0.7</sup> ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ115</td><td>D<sup>-</sup> D<sub>s1</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>s1</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td><td>( 2.8 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ116</td><td>D<sup>-</sup> D<sub>s1</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>s1</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td><td>( 1.7 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ117</td><td>D<sup>*</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ118</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> D<sub>s1</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>s1</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td><td>( 5.0 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ119</td><td>D<sup>*(2010)</sup> D<sub>s1</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>s1</sub><sup>+</sup> → D<sup>*0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 3.3 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ120</td><td>D<sup>-</sup>* D<sub>s1</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>s1</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td><td>( 5.0 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ121</td><td>D<sup>-</sup> D<sub>s,J</sub>(2573)<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>s,J</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td><td>( 3.4 ± 1.8 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ122</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> D<sub>s,J</sub>(2573)<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>s,J</sub><sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 2 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ123</td><td>D<sup>-</sup> D<sub>s,J</sub>(2700)<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>s,J</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td><td>( 7.1 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ124</td><td>D<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 7.3 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ125</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 2.03 ± 0.18 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ126</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>*+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 2.1 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ127</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> ρ<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ128</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> ρ<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 4.1 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ129</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> a<sub>0</sub><sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ130</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> a<sub>0</sub><sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ131</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.1 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ132</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.7 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ133</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> a<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.9 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ134</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> a<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.0 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ135</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 2.7 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ136</td><td>D<sup>*-</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 2.19 ± 0.30 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ137</td><td>D<sub>s1</sub>(2536)<sup>‡</sup> K<sup>±</sup>, D<sub>s1</sub><sup>-</sup> →</td><td>( 5.1 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ138</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 3.5 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ139</td><td>D<sup>*-</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 3.2 <sup>+</sup> <sup>1.5</sup> <sup>-</sup> <sup>1.3</sup> ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ140</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 9.7 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ141</td><td>D<sup>*-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.10 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ142</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.7 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ143</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ144</td><td>D<sup>*-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> K<sup>+</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.6 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ145</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 5.5 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ146</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 8.8 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ147</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 4.5 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ148</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>(1410)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 6.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ149</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 7 ± 7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ150</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>2</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 2.1 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ151</td><td>D<sub>0</sub>(2300)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>0</sub><sup>*-</sup> →</td><td>( 1.9 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ152</td><td>D<sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>*-</sup> →</td><td>( 2.03 ± 0.35 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ153</td><td>D<sup>3</sup>(2760)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>3</sub><sup>*-</sup> →</td><td>&lt; 1.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ154</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> nonresonant</td><td>&lt; 3.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ155</td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>]D K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 4.2 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ156</td><td>[π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]D K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 6.0 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ157</td><td>[π<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ158</td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ159</td><td>[π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*0</sup></td><td>( 4.6 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ160</td><td>[π<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*0</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ161</td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*0</sup></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ162</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 2.67 ± 0.09 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ163</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3.21 ± 0.21 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ164</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> f<sub>2</sub></td><td>( 1.56 ± 0.21 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ165</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> η</td><td>( 2.56 ± 0.12 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ166</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> η'</td><td>( 1.38 ± 0.16 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ167</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> ω</td><td>( 2.54 ± 0.16 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ168</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> φ</td><td>( 7.7 ± 2.3 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ169</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 5.3 ± 3.2 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ170</td><td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3.0 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ171</td><td>D<sup>*0</sup> γ</td><td>&lt; 2.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ172</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 2.2 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ173</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 5.1 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ174</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> η</td><td>( 2.3 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ175</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> η'</td><td>( 1.40 ± 0.22 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ176</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 6.2 ± 2.2 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ177</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 5.2 ± 1.9 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ178</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3.6 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ179</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 6.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ180</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> φ</td><td>( 2.2 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ181</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 4.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></table>
Meson Particle Listings

B⁰

See key on page 1171

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ182</td><td>D*(2007)⁰ π⁺π⁻π⁻π⁻</td><td>( 2.7 ± 0.5 ) × 10⁻³</td></tr><tr><td>Γ183</td><td>D*(2010)⁺D*(2010)⁻</td><td>( 8.0 ± 0.6 ) × 10⁻⁴</td></tr><tr><td>Γ184</td><td>D*<sup>-</sup>(2007)⁰ ω</td><td>( 3.6 ± 1.1 ) × 10⁻⁴</td><td>S=3.1</td></tr><tr><td>Γ185</td><td>D*(2010)⁺D⁻</td><td>( 6.1 ± 1.5 ) × 10⁻⁴</td><td>S=1.6</td></tr><tr><td>Γ186</td><td>D*(2007)⁰ D*<sup>-</sup>(2007)⁰</td><td>&lt; 9</td><td>× 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ187</td><td>D⁻D⁰K⁺</td><td>( 1.07 ± 0.11 ) × 10⁻³</td></tr><tr><td>Γ188</td><td>D⁻D*(2007)⁰ K⁺</td><td>( 3.5 ± 0.4 ) × 10⁻³</td></tr><tr><td>Γ189</td><td>D*(2010)⁻D⁰K⁺</td><td>( 2.47 ± 0.21 ) × 10⁻³</td></tr><tr><td>Γ190</td><td>D*(2010)⁻D*(2007)⁰ K⁺</td><td>( 1.06 ± 0.09 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ191</td><td>D⁻D⁺K⁰</td><td>( 7.5 ± 1.7 ) × 10⁻⁴</td></tr><tr><td>Γ192</td><td>D*(2010)⁻D⁺K⁰ +<br>D⁻D*(2010)⁺K⁰</td><td>( 6.4 ± 0.5 ) × 10⁻³</td></tr><tr><td>Γ193</td><td>D*(2010)⁻D*(2010)⁺K⁰</td><td>( 8.1 ± 0.7 ) × 10⁻³</td></tr><tr><td>Γ194</td><td>D*⁻D<sub>s1</sub>(2536)⁺, D<sub>s1</sub>⁺ →</td><td>( 8.0 ± 2.4 ) × 10⁻⁴</td></tr><tr><td>Γ195</td><td>D⁰D⁰D*<sup>+</sup>K⁰</td><td>( 2.7 ± 1.1 ) × 10⁻⁴</td></tr><tr><td>Γ196</td><td>D⁰D⁰K⁺π⁻</td><td>( 3.5 ± 0.5 ) × 10⁻⁴</td></tr><tr><td>Γ197</td><td>D⁰D*(2007)⁰ K⁰ +<br>D*<sup>-</sup>(2007)⁰D⁰K⁰</td><td>( 1.1 ± 0.5 ) × 10⁻³</td></tr><tr><td>Γ198</td><td>D*<sup>-</sup>(2007)⁰D*(2007)⁰K⁰</td><td>( 2.4 ± 0.9 ) × 10⁻³</td></tr><tr><td>Γ199</td><td>(D⁺D*<sup>-</sup>)(D+D*<sup>-</sup>)K</td><td>( 3.68 ± 0.26 ) %</td></tr></tbody></table>

Charmonium modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ200</td><td>η<sub>c</sub> K⁰</td><td>( 9.0 ± 1.1 ) × 10⁻⁴</td></tr><tr><td>Γ201</td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁺π⁻</td><td>( 6.5 ± 0.7 ) × 10⁻⁴</td></tr><tr><td>Γ202</td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁺π⁻ (NR)</td><td>( 6.7 ± 1.4 ) × 10⁻⁵</td></tr><tr><td>Γ203</td><td>T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>-</sup>(4100)⁻K⁺, T<sub>c</sub>τ⁻ →</td><td>( 2.2 ± 1.1 ) × 10⁻⁵</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>η<sub>c</sub> π⁻</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ204</td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K*(1410)⁰</td><td>( 2.1 ± 1.6 ) × 10⁻⁴</td></tr><tr><td>Γ205</td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K<sub>0</sub>*(1430)⁰</td><td>( 1.8 ± 0.4 ) × 10⁻⁴</td></tr><tr><td>Γ206</td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K<sub>2</sub>*(1430)⁰</td><td>( 5.4 ± 2.4 ) × 10⁻⁵</td></tr><tr><td>Γ207</td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K*(1680)⁰</td><td>( 4 ± 4 ) × 10⁻⁵</td></tr><tr><td>Γ208</td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K<sub>0</sub>*(1950)⁰</td><td>( 4.8 ± 3.2 ) × 10⁻⁵</td></tr><tr><td>Γ209</td><td>η<sub>c</sub> K*(892)⁰</td><td>( 5.3 ± 0.8 ) × 10⁻⁴ S=1.7</td></tr><tr><td>Γ210</td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(2S) K<sub>S</sub>⁰, η<sub>c</sub> → p pπ⁺π⁻</td><td>( 4.2 ± 1.4 ) × 10⁻⁷</td></tr><tr><td>Γ211</td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(2S) K*⁰</td><td>&lt; 3.9</td><td>× 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ212</td><td>h<sub>c</sub>(1P) K<sub>S</sub>⁰</td><td>&lt; 1.4</td><td>× 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ213</td><td>h<sub>c</sub>(1P) K*⁰</td><td>&lt; 4</td><td>× 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ214</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K⁰</td><td>( 8.91 ± 0.21 ) × 10⁻⁴</td></tr><tr><td>Γ215</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K⁺π⁻</td><td>( 1.15 ± 0.05 ) × 10⁻³</td></tr><tr><td>Γ216</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K*(892)⁰</td><td>( 1.27 ± 0.05 ) × 10⁻³</td></tr><tr><td>Γ217</td><td>J/ψ(1S) ηK<sub>S</sub>⁰</td><td>( 5.4 ± 0.9 ) × 10⁻⁵</td></tr><tr><td>Γ218</td><td>J/ψ(1S) η'K<sub>S</sub>⁰</td><td>&lt; 2.5</td><td>× 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ219</td><td>J/ψ(1S) φK⁰</td><td>( 4.9 ± 1.0 ) × 10⁻⁵</td></tr><tr><td>Γ220</td><td>J/ψ(1S) ωK⁰</td><td>( 2.3 ± 0.4 ) × 10⁻⁴</td></tr><tr><td>Γ221</td><td>χ<sub>c0</sub>(3915), χ<sub>c0</sub> → J/ψω</td><td>( 2.1 ± 0.9 ) × 10⁻⁵</td></tr><tr><td>Γ222</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K(1270)⁰</td><td>( 1.3 ± 0.5 ) × 10⁻³</td></tr><tr><td>Γ223</td><td>J/ψ(1S) π⁰</td><td>( 1.66 ± 0.10 ) × 10⁻⁵</td></tr><tr><td>Γ224</td><td>J/ψ(1S) η</td><td>( 1.08 ± 0.23 ) × 10⁻⁵ S=1.5</td></tr><tr><td>Γ225</td><td>J/ψ(1S) π⁺π⁻</td><td>( 3.99 ± 0.15 ) × 10⁻⁵</td></tr><tr><td>Γ226</td><td>J/ψ(1S) π⁺π⁻ nonresonant</td><td>&lt; 1.2</td><td>× 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ227</td><td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>0</sub>(500), f<sub>0</sub> → ππ</td><td>( 8.8 ± 1.2 ) × 10⁻⁶ S=1.5</td></tr><tr><td>Γ228</td><td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>2</sub></td><td>( 3.3 ± 0.5 ) × 10⁻⁶ S=1.5</td></tr><tr><td>Γ229</td><td>J/ψ(1S) ρ⁰</td><td>( 2.55 ± 0.18 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ230</td><td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub> →</td><td>&lt; 1.1</td><td>× 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>π⁺π⁻</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ231</td><td>J/ψ(1S) ρ(1450)⁰, ρ⁰ → ππ</td><td>( 2.9 ± 1.6 ) × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ232</td><td>J/ψρ(1700)⁰, ρ⁰ → π⁺π⁻</td><td>( 2.0 ± 1.3 ) × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ233</td><td>J/ψ(1S) ω</td><td>( 1.8 ± 0.7 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ234</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K⁺K⁻</td><td>( 2.53 ± 0.35 ) × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ235</td><td>J/ψ(1S) a<sub>0</sub>(980), a<sub>0</sub> →</td><td>( 4.7 ± 3.4 ) × 10⁻⁷ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>K⁺K⁻</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ236</td><td>J/ψ(1S) φ</td><td>&lt; 1.1</td><td>× 10⁻⁷ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ237</td><td>J/ψ(1S) η'(958)</td><td>( 7.6 ± 2.4 ) × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ238</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K⁰π⁺π⁻</td><td>( 4.5 ± 0.4 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ239</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K⁰K⁻π⁺ + c.c.</td><td>&lt; 2.1</td><td>× 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ240</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K⁰K⁺K⁻</td><td>( 2.5 ± 0.7 ) × 10⁻⁵ S=1.8</td></tr><tr><td>Γ241</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K⁰K∓π∓</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ242</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K⁰ρ⁰</td><td>( 5.4 ± 3.0 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ243</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K*(892)⁺π⁻</td><td>( 8 ± 4 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ244</td><td>J/ψ(1S) π⁺π⁻π⁻π⁻</td><td>( 1.44 ± 0.12 ) × 10⁻⁵</td></tr><tr><td>Γ245</td><td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>1</sub>(1285)</td><td>( 8.4 ± 2.1 ) × 10⁻⁶</td></tr><tr><td>Γ246</td><td>J/ψ(1S) K*(892)⁰ π⁺π⁻</td><td>( 6.6 ± 2.2 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ247</td><td>η<sub>c2</sub>(1D) K<sub>S</sub>⁰, η<sub>c2</sub> → h<sub>c</sub>γ</td><td>&lt; 3.5</td><td>× 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ248</td><td>η<sub>c2</sub>(1D) π⁻K⁺, η<sub>c2</sub> → h<sub>c</sub>γ</td><td>&lt; 1.0</td><td>× 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ249</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872)⁻K⁺</td><td>&lt; 5</td><td>× 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ250</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872)⁻K⁺, χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872)⁻ → J/ψ(1S) π⁻π⁰</td><td>[c] &lt; 4.2</td><td>× 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ251</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) K⁰</td><td>( 1.4 ± 0.4 ) × 10⁻⁴ S=1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Γ252</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) K*(892)⁰</td><td>( 1.1 ± 0.5 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ253</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) K⁺π⁻</td><td>( 2.2 ± 0.7 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ254</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) γ</td><td>&lt; 1.5</td><td>× 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ255</td><td>T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>-</sup>(4430)⁻K∓, T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>±</sup> → ψ(2S) π<sup>±</sup></td><td>( 6.0 ± 3.0 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ256</td><td>T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>-</sup>(4430)⁻K∓, T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>±</sup> → J/ψπ<sup>±</sup></td><td>( 5.4 ± 4.0 ) × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ257</td><td>T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>-</sup>(3900)⁻K∓, T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>±</sup> → J/ψπ<sup>±</sup></td><td>&lt; 9</td><td>× 10⁻⁷ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ258</td><td>T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>-</sup>(4200)⁻K∓, T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>±</sup> → J/ψπ<sup>±</sup></td><td>( 2.2 ± 1.3 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ259</td><td>J/ψ(1S) ρp</td><td>( 4.5 ± 0.6 ) × 10⁻⁷ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ260</td><td>J/ψ(1S) γ</td><td>&lt; 1.5</td><td>× 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ261</td><td>J/ψμ⁺μ⁻, J/ψ → μ⁺μ⁻</td><td>&lt; 1.0</td><td>× 10⁻⁹ CL=95%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ262</td><td>J/ψ(1S) D⁰</td><td>&lt; 1.3</td><td>× 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ263</td><td>ψ(2S) π⁰</td><td>( 1.17 ± 0.19 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ264</td><td>ψ(2S) K⁰</td><td>( 5.8 ± 0.5 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ265</td><td>ψ(2S) K⁰π⁺π⁻</td><td>( 2.81 ± 0.30 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ266</td><td>ψ(3770) K⁰, ψ → D⁰D⁰</td><td>&lt; 1.23</td><td>× 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ267</td><td>ψ(3770) K⁰, ψ → D⁻D⁺</td><td>&lt; 1.88</td><td>× 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ268</td><td>ψ(2S) π⁺π⁻</td><td>( 2.24 ± 0.35 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ269</td><td>ψ(2S) K⁺π⁻</td><td>( 5.8 ± 0.4 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ270</td><td>ψ(2S) K*(892)⁰</td><td>( 5.9 ± 0.4 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ271</td><td>χ<sub>c0</sub> K⁰</td><td>( 1.9 ± 0.4 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ272</td><td>χ<sub>c0</sub> K*(892)⁰</td><td>( 1.7 ± 0.4 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ273</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub> π⁰</td><td>( 1.12 ± 0.28 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ274</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub> K⁰</td><td>( 3.95 ± 0.27 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ275</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub> π⁻K⁺</td><td>( 4.97 ± 0.30 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ276</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub> K*(892)⁰</td><td>( 2.38 ± 0.19 ) × 10⁻⁴ S=1.2 CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ277</td><td>T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>-</sup>(4050)⁻K⁺, T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>±</sup> → χ<sub>c1</sub> π⁻</td><td>( 3.0 ± 4.0 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ278</td><td>T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>-</sup>(4250)⁻K⁺, T<sub>c</sub>τ<sup>±</sup> → χ<sub>c1</sub> π⁻</td><td>( 4.0 ± 20.0 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ279</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub> π⁺π⁻K⁰</td><td>( 3.2 ± 0.5 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ280</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub> π⁻π⁰K⁺</td><td>( 3.5 ± 0.6 ) × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ281</td><td>χ<sub>c2</sub> K⁰</td><td>&lt; 1.5</td><td>× 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ282</td><td>χ<sub>c2</sub> K*(892)⁰</td><td>( 4.9 ± 1.2 ) × 10⁻⁵ S=1.1 CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ283</td><td>χ<sub>c2</sub> π⁻K⁺</td><td>( 7.2 ± 1.0 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ284</td><td>χ<sub>c2</sub> π⁺π⁻K⁰</td><td>&lt; 1.70</td><td>× 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ285</td><td>χ<sub>c2</sub> π⁻π⁰K⁺</td><td>&lt; 7.4</td><td>× 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ286</td><td>ψ(4660) K⁰, ψ → Λ<sub>c</sub>⁺Λ<sub>c</sub>⁻</td><td>&lt; 2.3</td><td>× 10⁻⁴ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ287</td><td>ψ(4230)⁰ K⁰, ψ⁰ → J/ψπ⁺π⁻</td><td>&lt; 1.7</td><td>× 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">K or K* modes</td></tr><tr><td>Γ288</td><td>K⁺π⁻</td><td>( 2.00 ± 0.04 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ289</td><td>K⁰π⁰</td><td>( 1.01 ± 0.04 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ290</td><td>η' K⁰</td><td>( 6.6 ± 0.4 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ291</td><td>η' K*(892)⁰</td><td>( 2.8 ± 0.6 ) × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ292</td><td>η' K<sub>0</sub>*(1430)⁰</td><td>( 6.3 ± 1.6 ) × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ293</td><td>η' K<sub>2</sub>*(1430)⁰</td><td>( 1.37 ± 0.32 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ294</td><td>η K⁰</td><td>( 1.23 ± 0.27 ) × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ295</td><td>η K*(892)⁰</td><td>( 1.59 ± 0.10 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ296</td><td>η K<sub>0</sub>*(1430)⁰</td><td>( 1.10 ± 0.22 ) × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ297</td><td>η K<sub>2</sub>*(1430)⁰</td><td>( 9.6 ± 2.1 ) × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ298</td><td>ω K⁰</td><td>( 4.8 ± 0.4 ) × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ299</td><td>a<sub>0</sub>(980)⁰ K⁰, a<sub>0</sub> → ηπ⁰</td><td>&lt; 7.8</td><td>× 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ300</td><td>b<sub>1</sub>⁰ K⁰, b<sub>1</sub>⁰ → ωπ⁰</td><td>&lt; 7.8</td><td>× 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ301</td><td>a<sub>0</sub>(980)⁻K∓, a<sub>0</sub>⁻ → ηπ∓</td><td>&lt; 1.9</td><td>× 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ302</td><td>b<sub>1</sub>⁰ K⁺, b<sub>1</sub>⁰ → ωπ⁻</td><td>( 7.4 ± 1.4 ) × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ303</td><td>b<sub>1</sub>⁰ K⁰, b<sub>1</sub>⁰ → ωπ⁰</td><td>&lt; 8.0</td><td>× 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ304</td><td>b<sub>1</sub>⁰ K⁺*, b<sub>1</sub>⁰ → ωπ⁻</td><td>&lt; 5.0</td><td>× 10⁻⁶ CL=90%</td></tr></tbody></table>
Meson Particle Listings

B⁰

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ305</td><td>a<sub>0</sub>(1450)<sup>±</sup> K<sup>∓</sup>, a<sub>0</sub><sup>±</sup> → ηπ<sup>±</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ306</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>X<sup>0</sup> (Familon)</td><td>&lt; 5.3 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ307</td><td>ωK<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 2.0 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ308</td><td>ω(Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.84 ± 0.25 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ309</td><td>ωK<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.60 ± 0.34 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ310</td><td>ωK<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.01 ± 0.23 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ311</td><td>ωK<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> nonresonant</td><td>( 5.1 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ312</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3.78 ± 0.32 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ313</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 7.0 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ314</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>ρ(1450)<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 2.4 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ315</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>ρ(1700)<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 6 ± 7 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ316</td><td>(K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) nonresonant</td><td>( 2.8 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ317</td><td>(Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>, (Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3.4 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ318</td><td>(Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, (Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 8.6 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ319</td><td>K<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 4.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ320</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>(1680)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 7.5 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ321</td><td>K<sub>x</sub><sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>[d] ( 6.1 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ322</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 4.97 ± 0.18 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ323</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> nonresonant</td><td>( 1.39<sup>+ 0.26</sup><sub>- 0.18</sub> × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>S=1.6</td></tr><tr><td>Γ324</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3.4 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>S=2.3</td></tr><tr><td>Γ325</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 7.5 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ326</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 3.3 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>S=2.0</td></tr><tr><td>Γ327</td><td>K<sub>x</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>[d] ( 5.1 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ328</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>(1410)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>, K<sup>+</sup><sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.8 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ329</td><td>(Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>, (Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.62 ± 0.13 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ330</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(980) K<sup>0</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 8.1 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>S=1.3</td></tr><tr><td>Γ331</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>f<sub>0</sub>(500)</td><td>( 1.6<sup>+ 2.5</sup><sub>- 1.6</sub> × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ332</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>f<sub>0</sub>(1500)</td><td>( 1.3 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ333</td><td>f<sub>2</sub>(1270) K<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 2.7<sup>+ 1.3</sup><sub>- 1.2</sub> × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ334</td><td>f<sub>x</sub>(1300) K<sup>0</sup>, f<sub>x</sub> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.8 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ335</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3.3 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ336</td><td>K<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 3.65 ± 0.34 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ337</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(1680)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.41 ± 0.10 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ338</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>[e] &lt; 2.3 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ339</td><td>ρ<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 2.8 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ340</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(980) K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → ππ</td><td>( 1.4<sup>+ 0.5</sup><sub>- 0.6</sub> × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ341</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> nonresonant</td><td>&lt; 2.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ342</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 5.5 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ343</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3.9 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>S=1.9</td></tr><tr><td>Γ344</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> f<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub> → ππ</td><td>( 3.9<sup>+ 2.1</sup><sub>- 1.8</sub> × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>S=3.9</td></tr><tr><td>Γ345</td><td>K<sub>1</sub>(1270)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ346</td><td>K<sub>1</sub>(1400)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ347</td><td>a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>[e] ( 1.6 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ348</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.03 ± 0.26 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ349</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 2.8 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ350</td><td>K<sub>1</sub>(1400)<sup>0</sup> ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ351</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 2.7 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ352</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> f<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub> → ππ</td><td>( 2.7 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ353</td><td>K<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> f<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub> → ππ</td><td>( 8.6 ± 2.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ354</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 7.8 ± 1.5 ) × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ355</td><td>K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.21 ± 0.16 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ356</td><td>K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 6.7 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ357</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>±</sup> K<sup>∓</sup></td><td>&lt; 4 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ358</td><td>K<sup>-</sup> K<sup>0</sup> + K<sup>*</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 9.6 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ359</td><td>K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 2.2 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ360</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 9 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ361</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> η</td><td>&lt; 1.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ362</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> η'</td><td>&lt; 2.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ363</td><td>K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 2.68 ± 0.11 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ364</td><td>K<sup>0</sup> ϕ</td><td>( 7.3 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ365</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(980) K<sup>0</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 7.0<sup>+ 3.5</sup><sub>- 3.0</sub> × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ366</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(1500) K<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.3<sup>+ 0.7</sup><sub>- 0.5</sub> × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ367</td><td>f'<sub>2</sub>(1525)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3<sup>+ 5</sup><sub>- 4</sub> × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ368</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(1710) K<sup>0</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 4.4 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ369</td><td>K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> nonresonant</td><td>( 3.3 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ370</td><td>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>( 6.0 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>S=1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Γ371</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(980) K<sup>0</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>( 2.7 ± 1.8 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ372</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(1710) K<sup>0</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>( 5.0<sup>+ 5.0</sup><sub>- 2.6</sub> ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ373</td><td>f<sub>2</sub>(2010) K<sup>0</sup>, f<sub>2</sub> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>( 5 ± 6 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ374</td><td>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> nonresonant</td><td>( 1.33 ± 0.31 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ375</td><td>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ376</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 2.75 ± 0.26 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ377</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> ϕ</td><td>( 1.00 ± 0.05 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ378</td><td>K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> nonresonant</td><td>&lt; 7.17 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ379</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 4.5 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ380</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 8.3 ± 2.4 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>S=1.5</td></tr><tr><td>Γ381</td><td>K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>-</sup> nonresonant</td><td>&lt; 6.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ382</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ383</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 2 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ384</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ385</td><td>K<sub>1</sub>(1400)<sup>0</sup> ϕ</td><td>&lt; 5.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ386</td><td>ϕ(Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>( 4.3 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ387</td><td>ϕ(Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> (1.60 < mKπ < 2.15)</td><td>[f] &lt; 1.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ388</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.18 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ389</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ390</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 8.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ391</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> ϕ</td><td>( 3.9 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ392</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>*</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ393</td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> K<sub>0</sub><sup>*</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 4.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ394</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(1680)<sup>0</sup> ϕ</td><td>&lt; 3.5 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ395</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(1780)<sup>0</sup> ϕ</td><td>&lt; 2.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ396</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(2045)<sup>0</sup> ϕ</td><td>&lt; 1.53 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ397</td><td>K<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> ϕ</td><td>&lt; 1.1 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ398</td><td>K<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> ϕ</td><td>( 6.8 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>S=1.2</td></tr><tr><td>Γ399</td><td>K<sup>0</sup> ϕϕ</td><td>( 3.7 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>S=1.3</td></tr><tr><td>Γ400</td><td>η'η' K<sub>0</sub></td><td>&lt; 3.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ401</td><td>η' K<sup>0</sup> γ</td><td>( 7.6 ± 1.8 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ402</td><td>η' K<sup>0</sup> γ</td><td>&lt; 6.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ403</td><td>K<sup>0</sup> ϕγ</td><td>( 2.7 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ404</td><td>K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> γ</td><td>( 4.6 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ405</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> γ</td><td>( 4.18 ± 0.25 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>S=2.1</td></tr><tr><td>Γ406</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(1410)γ</td><td>&lt; 1.3 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ407</td><td>K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> γ nonresonant</td><td>&lt; 2.6 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ408</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> X(214), X → μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup> [g] &lt;</td><td>2.26 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ409</td><td>K<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> γ</td><td>( 1.99 ± 0.18 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ410</td><td>K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup> γ</td><td>( 4.1 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ411</td><td>K<sub>1</sub>(1270)<sup>0</sup> γ</td><td>&lt; 5.8 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ412</td><td>K<sub>1</sub>(1400)<sup>0</sup> γ</td><td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ413</td><td>K<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> γ</td><td>( 1.24 ± 0.24 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ414</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(1680)<sup>0</sup> γ</td><td>&lt; 2.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ415</td><td>K<sub>3</sub><sup>0</sup>(1780)<sup>0</sup> γ</td><td>&lt; 8.3 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ416</td><td>K<sub>4</sub>(2045)<sup>0</sup> γ</td><td>&lt; 4.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr></tbody></table>

Light unflavored meson modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ417</td><td>ρ<sup>0</sup>γ</td><td>( 8.6 ± 1.5 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ418</td><td>ρ<sup>0</sup>X(214), X → μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup> [g] &lt;</td><td>1.73 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ419</td><td>ωγ</td><td>( 4.4<sup>+ 1.8</sup><sub>- 1.6</sub> ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ420</td><td>ϕγ</td><td>&lt; 1.0 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ421</td><td>f<sub>2</sub>(1270)γ, f<sub>2</sub> → (KS)<sup>0</sup>(KS)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.1 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ422</td><td>f'<sub>2</sub>(1525)γ, f'<sub>2</sub> → (KS)<sup>0</sup>(KS)<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.1 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ423</td><td>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 5.37 ± 0.20 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>S=1.3</td></tr><tr><td>Γ424</td><td>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.55 ± 0.17 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>S=1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Γ425</td><td>ηπ<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 4.1 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ426</td><td>ηη</td><td>&lt; 1.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ427</td><td>η'<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.2 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>S=1.7</td></tr><tr><td>Γ428</td><td>η'<sup>0</sup>η'</td><td>&lt; 1.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ429</td><td>η'<sup>0</sup>η</td><td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ430</td><td>η'<sup>0</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ431</td><td>η'<sup>0</sup> f<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub> → π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 9 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ432</td><td>ηρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.5 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ433</td><td>ηf<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub> → π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 4 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ434</td><td>ωη</td><td>( 9.4<sup>+ 4.0</sup><sub>- 3.1</sub> ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ435</td><td>ωη'</td><td>( 1.0<sup>+ 0.5</sup><sub>- 0.4</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ436</td><td>ωρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.6 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ437</td><td>ωf<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub> → π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.5 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ438</td><td>ωω</td><td>( 1.2 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>568</sub></td><td>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>( 2.1 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-8</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>569</sub></td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>νν</td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 1.8 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>570</sub></td><td>invisible</td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 2.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>571</sub></td><td>ννγ</td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 1.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>572</sub></td><td>φμ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 3.2 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>573</sub></td><td>φνν</td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 1.27 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>574</sub></td><td>e<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>+</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>[h] &lt; 1.0 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>575</sub></td><td>π<sup>0</sup>e<sup>±</sup>μ<sup>±</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 1.4 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>576</sub></td><td>K<sup>0</sup>e<sup>±</sup>μ<sup>±</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 3.8 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>577</sub></td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> e<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 6.8 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>578</sub></td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> e<sup>-</sup>μ<sup>+</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 5.7 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>579</sub></td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> e<sup>±</sup>μ<sup>±</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 1.01 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>580</sub></td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> τ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 1.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>581</sub></td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> τ<sup>-</sup>μ<sup>+</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 8.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>582</sub></td><td>e<sup>±</sup>τ<sup>+</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>[h] &lt; 1.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>583</sub></td><td>μ<sup>±</sup>τ<sup>+</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>[h] &lt; 1.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=95%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>584</sub></td><td>ρμ<sup>-</sup></td><td>L,B</td><td>&lt; 2.6 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>585</sub></td><td>Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub>μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>L,B</td><td>&lt; 1.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>586</sub></td><td>Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> e<sup>-</sup></td><td>L,B</td><td>&lt; 4 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr></tbody></table>

[a] An $ℓ$ indicates an e or a $μ$ mode, not a sum over these modes.

[b] $\bar{D}^{**}$ represents an excited state with mass $2.2 < M < 2.8$ GeV/c².

[c] $\chi_{c1}(3872)^{+}$ is a hypothetical charged partner of the $\chi_{c1}(3872)$.

[d] Stands for the possible candidates of $K^*(1410)$, $K_0^*(1430)$ and $K_2^*(1430)$.

[e] $B^0$ and $B_0^0$ contributions not separated. Limit is on weighted average of the two decay rates.

[f] This decay refers to the coherent sum of resonant and nonresonant $J^P = 0^+ K \pi$ components with $1.60 < m_{K\pi} < 2.15$ GeV/c².

[g] $\chi(214)$ is a hypothetical particle of mass 214 MeV/c² reported by the HyperCP experiment, Physical Review Letters 94 021801 (2005)

[h] The value is for the sum of the charge states or particle/antiparticle states indicated.

[i] $\Theta(1540)^+$ denotes a possible narrow pentaquark state.

[j] $\psi_{DS}$ is a GeV-scale dark sector antibaryon (mass range 1–4 GeV/c²).

[k] Here S and P are the hypothetical scalar and pseudoscalar particles with masses of 2.5 GeV/c² and 214.3 MeV/c², respectively.

## FIT INFORMATION

An overall fit to 36 branching ratios uses 95 measurements to determine 22 parameters. The overall fit has a $\chi^2 = 72.1$ for 73 degrees of freedom.

The following off-diagonal array elements are the correlation coefficients $\langle\delta x_i \delta x_j\rangle/(\delta x_i \delta x_j)$, in percent, from the fit to the branching fractions, $x_i \equiv \Gamma_i/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$.

<table><tbody><tr><td>x<sub>10</sub></td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>38</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>50</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>76</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>4</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>125</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>19</td><td>6</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>135</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>7</td><td>2</td><td>0</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>214</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>216</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>264</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>270</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>276</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>29</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>282</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>6</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>288</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>322</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>356</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>363</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>377</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>423</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>454</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>560</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>565</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>15</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>7</sub></td><td>x<sub>10</sub></td><td>x<sub>38</sub></td><td>x<sub>50</sub></td><td>x<sub>76</sub></td><td>x<sub>125</sub></td><td>x<sub>135</sub></td><td>x<sub>214</sub></td><td>x<sub>216</sub></td><td>x<sub>264</sub></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>x<sub>276</sub></td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>282</sub></td><td>0</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>288</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>322</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>356</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>363</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>27</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>377</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>423</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>454</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>20</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>560</sub></td><td>0</td><td>4</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>565</sub></td><td>0</td><td>4</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>270</sub></td><td>x<sub>276</sub></td><td>x<sub>282</sub></td><td>x<sub>288</sub></td><td>x<sub>322</sub></td><td>x<sub>356</sub></td><td>x<sub>363</sub></td><td>x<sub>377</sub></td><td>x<sub>423</sub></td><td>x<sub>454</sub></td></tr></tbody></table>

## B⁰ BRANCHING RATIOS

For branching ratios in which the charge of the decaying B is not determined, see the $B^{\pm}$ section.

### $\Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_e X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>10.33&plusmn;0.28 OUR EVALUATION</strong></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>10.14&plusmn;0.30 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>10.46&plusmn;0.30&plusmn;0.23</td><td>1 URQUIJO</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>9.64&plusmn;0.27&plusmn;0.33</td><td>2 AUBERT, B</td><td>06Y BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>10.78&plusmn;0.60&plusmn;0.69</td><td>3 ARTUSO</td><td>97 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>9.3 &plusmn; 1.1 &plusmn; 1.5</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94 ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>9.9 &plusmn; 3.0 &plusmn; 0.9</td><td>HENDERSON</td><td>92 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">● ● ● We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. ● ● ●</td></tr><tr><td>10.32&plusmn;0.36&plusmn;0.35</td><td>4 OKABE</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by URQUIJO 07</td></tr><tr><td>10.9 &plusmn; 0.7 &plusmn; 1.1</td><td>ATHANAS</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>Sup. by ARTUSO 97</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. URQUIJO 07 report a measurement of $(9.80 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.21)\%$ for the partial branching fraction of $B \to e\nu_e X_c$ decay with electron energy above 0.6 GeV. We converted the result to $B \to e\nu_e X$ branching fraction.

2. The measurements are obtained for charged and neutral B mesons partial rates of semileptonic decay to electrons with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c in the B rest frame. The best precision on the ratio is achieved for a momentum threshold of 1.0 GeV: $B(B^+ \to e^+ \nu_e X) / B(B^0 \to e^+ \nu_e X) = 1.074 \pm 0.041 \pm 0.026$.

3. ARTUSO 97 uses partial reconstruction of $B \to D^* \ell \nu_\ell$ and inclusive semileptonic branching ratio from BARISH 96B (0.1049 $\pm$ 0.0017 $\pm$ 0.0043).

4. The measurements are obtained for charged and neutral B mesons partial rates of semileptonic decay to electrons with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c in the B rest frame, and their ratio of $B(B^+ \to e^+ \nu_e X) / B(B^0 \to e^+ \nu_e X) = 1.08 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.02$.

### $\Gamma(e^+ \nu_e X_c)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>10.08&plusmn;0.30&plusmn;0.22</strong></td><td>1 URQUIJO</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Measure the independent $B^+$ and $B^0$ partial branching fractions with electron threshold energies of 0.4 GeV.

### $\Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_e X_u)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Requires $E_\ell^* > 1$ GeV, where $E_\ell^*$ is lepton energy in B rest frame.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.51&plusmn;0.10&plusmn;0.16</strong></td><td>1 CAO</td><td>21A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. The correlation of 50% with $B(B^+ \to \ell^+ \nu_\ell X_u)$ (lepton energy in B rest frame $E_\ell^* > 1$ GeV) was reported.

### $\Gamma(D^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2.12&plusmn;0.06 OUR EVALUATION</strong></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>2.25&plusmn;0.08 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.31&plusmn;0.03&plusmn;0.11</td><td>1 GLATTAUER</td><td>16 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>2.21&plusmn;0.11&plusmn;0.11</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>10 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>2.09&plusmn;0.13&plusmn;0.18</td><td>3 BARTELT</td><td>99 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>2.35&plusmn;0.20&plusmn;0.44</td><td>4 BUSKULIC</td><td>97 ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">● ● ● We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. ● ● ●</td></tr><tr><td>2.21&plusmn;0.11&plusmn;0.12</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08Q BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 10</td></tr><tr><td>2.13&plusmn;0.12&plusmn;0.39</td><td>ABE</td><td>02E BELL</td><td>Repl. by GLATTAUER 16</td></tr><tr><td>1.87&plusmn;0.15&plusmn;0.32</td><td>5 ATHANAS</td><td>97 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by BARTELT 99</td></tr><tr><td>1.8 &plusmn; 0.6 &plusmn; 0.3</td><td>6 FULTON</td><td>91 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>2.0 &plusmn; 0.7 &plusmn; 0.6</td><td>7 ALBRECHT</td><td>89J ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side while the other, on the signal side, is partially reconstructed from $B \to D\ell\nu$.

2. Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

3. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

4. BUSKULIC 97 assumes fraction $(B^+) = \text{fraction } (B^0) = (37.8 \pm 2.2)\%$ and PDG 96 values for B lifetime and branching ratio of $D^*$ and $D$ decays.
⁵ ATHANAS 97 uses missing energy and missing momentum to reconstruct neutrino.

⁶ FULTON 91 assumes assuming equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at the T(4S) and uses Mark III D and D⁺ branching ratios.

⁷ ALBRECHT 89j reports 0.018 ± 0.006 ± 0.005. We rescale using the method described in STONE 94 but with the updated PDG 94 B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>e</sub>)/Γ(ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>e</sub>X)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.230±0.011±0.011</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>10</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses a fully reconstructed B meson on the recoil side.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>e</sub>)/Γ(Dℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>e</sub>X)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.215±0.016±0.013</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AN BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses a fully reconstructed B meson on the recoil side.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>τ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>τ</sub>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.04±0.35±0.18</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08N BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09S</td></tr></table>

¹ Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>τ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>τ</sub>)/Γ(D<sup>-</sup>ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.469±0.084±0.053</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12D</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.489±0.165±0.069</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09S BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 12D</td></tr></table>

¹ Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

² Uses τ⁺ → e⁺νₑτ⁻τ and τ⁺ → μ⁺ν_μτ and e⁺ or μ⁺ as ℓ⁺.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D*(2010)<sup>-</sup>ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE (%)</td><td>EVTS</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

4.90 ±0.12 **OUR EVALUATION** (Produced by HFLAV) This value assumes isospin symmetry.

5.11 ±0.14 **OUR FIT** Error includes scale factor of 1.4.

5.11 ±0.15 **OUR AVERAGE** Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below.

4.922±0.023±0.220 1 ADACHI 23J BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

5.02±0.02 ±0.16 2 WAHEED 21 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

5.49 ±0.16 ±0.25 3 AUBERT 08Q BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

4.69 ±0.04 ±0.34 4 AUBERT 08R BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

5.90 ±0.22 ±0.50 5 ABDALLAH 04D DLPH e⁺e⁻ → Z⁰

6.09 ±0.19 ±0.40 6 ADAM 03 CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

4.70 ±0.13 +0.36 -0.31 7 ABREU 01H DLPH e⁺e⁻ → Z

5.26 ±0.20 ±0.46 8 ABBIENDI 00Q OPAL e⁺e⁻ → Z

5.53 ±0.26 ±0.52 9 BUSKULIC 97 ALEP e⁺e⁻ → Z

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

4.917±0.032±0.216 10 ADACHI 23J BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

4.926±0.032±0.231 11 ADACHI 23J BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

4.90 ±0.02 ±0.16 2 WAHEED 19 BELL Repl. by WAHEED 21

4.58 ±0.03 ±0.26 2 DUNGEL 10 BELL Repl. by WAHEED 19

4.90 ±0.07 +0.36 -0.35 5 AUBERT 05E BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08R

5.39 ±0.11 ±0.34 12 ABDALLAH 04D DLPH e⁺e⁻ → Z⁰

4.59 ±0.23 ±0.40 13 ABE 02F BELL Repl. by DUNGEL 10

6.09 ±0.19 ±0.40 14 BRIERE 02 CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

5.08 ±0.21 ±0.66 15 ACKERSTAFF 97G OPAL Repl. by ABBIENDI 00Q

5.52 ±0.17 ±0.68 16 ABREU 96P DLPH Repl. by ABREU 01H

4.49 ±0.32 ±0.39 376 17 BARISH 95 CLE2 Repl. by ADAM 03

5.18 ±0.30 ±0.62 410 18 BUSKULIC 95N ALEP Sup. by BUSKULIC 97

4.5 ±0.3 ±0.4 19 ALBRECHT 94 ARG e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

4.7 ±0.5 ±0.5 235 20 ALBRECHT 93 ARG e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

seen 398 21 SANGHERA 93 CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

7.0 ±1.8 ±1.4 22 ANTREASYAN 90B CBAL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

6.0 ±1.0 ±1.4 23 ALBRECHT 89C ARG e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

4.0 ±0.4 ±0.6 24 ALBRECHT 89J ARG e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

25 BORTOLETT089B CLEO e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

7.0 ±1.2 ±1.9 47 26 ALBRECHT 87J ARG e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1 Uses fully reconstructed D⁻*ℓ⁺ν events with ℓ = e or μ.

2 WAHEED 21 uses fully reconstructed D⁻*ℓ⁺ν events (ℓ = e or μ).

3 Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

⁴ Measured using fully reconstructed D* sample and a simultaneous fit to the Caprini- Lellouch-Neubert form factor parameters: ρ² = 1.191 ± 0.048 ± 0.028, R₁(1) = 1.429 ± 0.061 ± 0.044, and R₂(1) = 0.827 ± 0.038 ± 0.022.

⁵ Measured using fully reconstructed D* sample.

⁶ Uses the combined fit of both B⁰ → D*(2010)⁻ℓν and B⁺ → D̄(2007)⁰ℓν samples.

⁷ ABREU 01H measured using about 5000 partial reconstructed D* sample.

⁸ ABBIENDI 00Q assumes the fraction B(b → B⁰) = (39.7 +1.8 -2.2)%). This result is an average of two methods using exclusive and partial D* reconstruction.

⁹ BUSKULIC 97 assumes fraction (B⁺) = fraction (B⁰) = (37.8 ± 2.2)% and PDG 96 values for B lifetime and D* and D branching fractions.

¹⁰ Uses fully reconstructed D*⁻e⁺ν events.

¹¹ Uses fully reconstructed D*⁻μ⁺ν events.

¹² Combines with previous partial reconstructed D* measurement.

¹³ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

¹⁴ The results are based on the same analysis and data sample reported in ADAM 03.

¹⁵ ACKERSTAFF 97c assumes fraction (B⁺) = fraction (B⁰) = (37.8 ± 2.2)% and PDG 96 values for B lifetime and branching ratio of D* and D decays.

¹⁶ ABREU 96p result is the average of two methods using exclusive and partial D* reconstruction.

¹⁷ BARISH 95 use B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺) = (3.91 ± 0.08 ± 0.17)% and B(D*⁺ → D⁰π⁺) = (68.1 ± 1.0 ± 1.3)%.

¹⁸ BUSKULIC 95N assumes fraction (B⁺) = fraction (B⁰) = 38.2 ± 1.3 ± 2.2% and τB⁰ = 1.58 ± 0.06 ps. Γ(D*⁻ℓ⁺νₚ)/total = [5.18 - 0.13(fraction(B⁰) - 38.2) - 1.5(τB⁰ - 1.58)]%.

¹⁹ ALBRECHT 94 assumes B(D*⁺ → D⁰π⁺) = 68.1 ± 1.0 ± 1.3%. Uses partial reconstruction of D*⁺ and is independent of D⁰ branching ratios.

²⁰ ALBRECHT 93 reports 0.052 ± 0.005 ± 0.006. We rescale using the method described in STONE 94 but with the updated PDG 94 B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺). We have taken their average e and μ value. They also obtain α = 2*Γ⁰/(Γ⁻ + Γ⁺) - 1 = 1.1 ± 0.4 ± 0.2, A<sub>FB</sub> = 3/4*(Γ⁻ + Γ⁺)/Γ = 0.14 ± 0.06 ± 0.03. Assuming a value of V<sub>Cd</sub>, they measure V, A₁, and A₂, the three form factors for the D*⁻ℓₚ decay, where results are slightly dependent on model assumptions.

²¹ Combining D*⁰ℓ⁺νₚ and D*⁻ℓ⁺νₚ SANGHERA 93 test V-A structure and fit the decay angular distributions to obtain A<sub>FB</sub> = 3/4*(Γ⁻ + Γ⁺)/Γ = 0.14 ± 0.06 ± 0.03. Assuming a value of V<sub>Cd</sub>, they measure V, A₁, and A₂, the three form factors for the D*⁻ℓₚ decay, where results are slightly dependent on model assumptions.

²² ANTREASYAN 90B is average over B and D* (2010) charge states.

²³ The measurement of ALBRECHT 89c suggests a D* polarization γL/γT of 0.85 ± 0.45. or α = 0.7 ± 0.9.

²⁴ ALBRECHT 89j is ALBRECHT 87j value rescaled using B(D*(2010)⁻ → D⁰π⁻) = 0.57 ± 0.04 ± 0.04. Superseded by ALBRECHT 93.

²⁵ We have taken average of the BORTOLETTO 89B values for electrons and muons, 0.046 ± 0.005 ± 0.007. We rescale using the method described in STONE 94 but with the updated PDG 94 B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺). The measurement suggests a D* polarization parameter value α = 0.65 ± 0.66 ± 0.25.

²⁶ ALBRECHT 87j assume μ-e universality, the B(T(4S) → B⁰D̄) = 0.45, the B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺) = (0.042 ± 0.004 ± 0.004), and the B(D*(2010)⁻ → D⁰π⁻) = 0.49 ± 0.08. Superseded by ALBRECHT 89j.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
5.11±0.15 (Error scaled by 1.4)

<figure><img src="image_594.png" /></figure>

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

Γ(D*(2010)<sup>-</sup>ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub>)/Γ<sub>total</sub> (%)

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D*(2010)<sup>-</sup>ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub>)/Γ(Dℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub>X)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.537±0.031±0.036</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AN BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses a fully reconstructed B meson on the recoil side.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D*(2010)<sup>-</sup> e<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>e</sub>)/Γ(D*(2010)<sup>-</sup> μ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>μ</sub>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.001±0.019 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tr><td>0.998±0.009±0.020</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>23J BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.011±0.035±0.024</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D*(2010)<sup>-</sup>τ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>τ</sub>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1.45±0.10 **OUR FIT** Error includes scale factor of 1.3.

1.48±0.18 **OUR AVERAGE** Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

<table><tr><td>1.42±0.094±0.140</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.02 +0.40 -0.37</td><td>2 MATYJA</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.11±0.51 ±0.06</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>08N BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09S</td></tr></table>

¹ Noramlizes to B(D⁰ → D*(2010)⁻π⁺π⁻π⁺) = (7.214 ± 0.28) × 10⁻³.

² Observed in the recoil of the accompanying B meson.

³ Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.
$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- \tau^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \qquad \Gamma_{10}/\Gamma_7 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.284±0.019 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.3.

0.283±0.025 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.257±0.012±0.018</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>23W</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.302±0.030±0.011</td><td>3 SATO</td><td>16B</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.355±0.039±0.021</td><td>4,5 LEES</td><td>12D</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.247±0.015±0.019</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23W</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.291±0.019±0.029</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18D</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 23W</td></tr><tr><td>0.336±0.027±0.030</td><td>6 AAIJ</td><td>15Q</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 23AR</td></tr><tr><td>0.207±0.095±0.008</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>09S</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 12D</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses $\tau^+ \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $\tau^+ \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^0\bar{\nu}_\tau$, and $\mu^+$ as $\ell^+$.

2 Combination with measurement from AAIJ 18d.

3 Uses semileptonic B decay events for tagging and $\tau^+ \to \ell^+\nu_\ell\bar{\nu}_\tau$ mode.

4 Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

5 Uses $\tau^+ \to e^+\nu_e\bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $\tau^+ \to \mu^+\nu_\mu\bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $e^+$ or $\mu^+$ as $\ell^+$.

6 Uses $\tau^+ \to \mu^+\nu_\mu\bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $\mu^+$ as $\ell^+$.

<figure><img src="image_595.png" /><figcaption>WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.283±0.025 (Error scaled by 1.5)</figcaption></figure>

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- \tau^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- \pi^+ \pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{10}/\Gamma_{61} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.77±0.08±0.10 1,2 AAIJ 23W LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.70±0.10<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.10</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23W</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1.97±0.13±0.18 1 AAIJ 18D LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 23W

1 Uses $\tau^+ \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $\tau^+ \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^0\bar{\nu}_\tau$ modes.

2 Combination with result from AAIJ 18d.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(\pi^0 n \ell^+ \nu_\ell (n \ge 1)) / \Gamma(D^*(\ell^+ \nu_\ell \chi)) \qquad \Gamma_{11}/\Gamma_4 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.248±0.032±0.030 1 AUBERT 07AN BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

1 Uses a fully reconstructed B meson on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(D^0\pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{12}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

3.64±0.20 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.60±0.18±0.11</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.3 ±0.8 ±0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08Q</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.05±0.36±0.41</td><td>VOSSEN</td><td>18</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by MEIER 23</td></tr><tr><td>4.2 ±0.8 ±0.1</td><td>1,2 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by VOSSEN 18</td></tr><tr><td>3.3 ±0.9 ±0.1</td><td>3 LIVENTSEV</td><td>05</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIVENTSEV 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

2 LIVENTSEV 08 reports $(4.2 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^0\pi^-\ell^+\nu_\ell)/[B(B^0 \to D^-\ell^+\nu_\ell)]]$ assuming $B(B^0 \to D^-\ell^+\nu_\ell) = (2.12 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(B^0 \to D^-\ell^+\nu_\ell) = (2.12 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3 LIVENTSEV 05 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^0\pi^-\ell^+\nu_\ell)/[B(B^0 \to D^0\ell^+\nu_\ell)]] = 0.15 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.03$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to D^0\ell^+\nu_\ell) = (2.21 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D_0^*(2300)^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell, D_0^{*-} \to D^0\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{13}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL<sup>%</sup></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<4.4 90 MEIER 23 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>44 ±8±6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BL</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>20 ±7±5</td><td>1 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(D_2^*(2460)^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell, D_2^{*-} \to D^0\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{14}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.41±0.20 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.7. See the ideogram below.

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.57±0.15±0.05</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.10±0.17±0.08</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09Y</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.2 ±0.4 ±0.4</td><td>2 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a simultaneous fit of all B semileptonic decays without full reconstruction of events. AUBERT 09Y reports $B(B^0 \to D_2^*(2460)^-\ell^+\nu_\ell) \cdot B(D_2^*(2460)^- \to D^*(0)\pi^-) = (1.77 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-3}$ and the authors have provided us the individual measurement.

2 Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

<figure><img src="image_596.png" /><figcaption>WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.41±0.20 (Error scaled by 1.7)</figcaption></figure>

$$ \Gamma(D^*0\pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{15}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

5.44±0.28 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.51±0.24±0.17</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.8 ±0.8 ±0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08Q</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.46±0.53±0.52</td><td>VOSSEN</td><td>18</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by MEIER 23</td></tr><tr><td>5.6 ±2.2 ±0.2</td><td>1,2 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by VOSSEN 18</td></tr><tr><td>5.5 ±1.2 ±0.2</td><td>3,4 LIVENTSEV</td><td>05</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIVENTSEV 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

2 LIVENTSEV 08 reports $(5.6 \pm 2.1 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^0\pi^-\ell^+\nu_\ell)/[B(B^0 \to D^-\ell^+\nu_\ell)]]$ assuming $B(B^0 \to D^-\ell^+\nu_\ell) = (2.12 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(B^0 \to D^-\ell^+\nu_\ell) = (2.12 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3 Excludes $D^+\pi^+$ contribution to $D\pi$ modes.

4 LIVENTSEV 05 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^0\pi^-\ell^+\nu_\ell)/[\Gamma_{\text{total}} / [B(B^0 \to D^0\pi^+(2007)\ell^+\nu_\ell)] = 0.10 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.01$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to D^0\pi^+(2007)\ell^+\nu_\ell) = (5.53 \pm 0.22) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D_1(2420)^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell, D_1^- \to D^0\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{16}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.85±0.25 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.06±0.50±0.28</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.78±0.24±0.25</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09Y</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.7 ±0.4 ±0.3</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08BL</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.4 ±1.9 ±0.9</td><td>2 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a simultaneous measurement of all B semileptonic decays without full reconstruction of events.

2 Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(D_1(2420)^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell, D_1^- \to D^-\pi^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{17}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.02±0.13±0.09</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
$$ \Gamma(D'_1(2430)^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell, D'_1^- \to \bar{D}^*0 \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{18}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.5 ±0.6 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>2.06 ± 0.68 ± 0.25</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.1 ± 0.7 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BL</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;5.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(D'_2(2460)^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell, D'_2^- \to \bar{D}^*0 \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{19}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

6.6 ±1.1 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>5.1 ± 4.0 ± 1.0</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>6.7 ± 1.2 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09Y</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>7 ± 2 ± 2</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08BL</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;30</td><td>90</td><td>2 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Uses a simultaneous fit of all B semileptonic decays without full reconstruction of events. AUBERT 09Y reports $B(B^0 \to \bar{D}_2^*(2460)^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \cdot B(D_2^*(2460)^- \to \bar{D}^*(0) \pi^-) = (1.77 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-3}$ and the authors have provided us the individual measurement.

² Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(D^- \pi^+ \pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{20}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>1.45 ± 0.18 ± 0.13</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma(D^- \pi^+ \pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma(D^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \quad \Gamma_{20}/\Gamma_5 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>5.8 ± 1.8 ± 1.2</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Measurement used electrons and muons as leptons.

$$ \Gamma(D^* - \pi^+ \pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{21}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>5.1 ± 2.1 ± 0.9</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma(D^*- \pi^+ \pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \quad \Gamma_{21}/\Gamma_7 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>2.8 ± 0.8 ± 0.6</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Measurement used electrons and muons as leptons.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{22}/\Gamma $$

$\ell = e$ or $\mu$, not sum over $e$ and $\mu$ modes.

"OUR EVALUATION" includes both $B^0$ and $B^+$ decays. The average assumes equality of the semileptonic decay width for these isospin conjugate states.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.94 ± 0.11 ± 0.18 OUR EVALUATION (Produced by HFLAV)

2.45 ± 0.32 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below.

<table><tr><td>3.22 ± 0.27 ± 0.24</td><td>1 SIBIDANOV</td><td>13</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.75 ± 0.15 ± 0.27</td><td>2 DEL-AMO-SA..11C</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.93 ± 0.37 ± 0.37</td><td>3 ADAM</td><td>07</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.17 ± 0.54 ± 0.32</td><td>4 HOKUUE</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.57 ± 0.29<sup>+0.53</sup><sub>-0.62</sub></td><td>5 BEHRENS</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.14 ± 0.21 ± 0.56</td><td>2 AUBERT, B</td><td>050</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11C</td></tr><tr><td>2.17 ± 0.34<sup>+0.62</sup><sub>-0.68</sub></td><td>6 ATHAR</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by ADAM 07</td></tr><tr><td>3.29 ± 0.42 ± 0.72</td><td>7 AUBERT</td><td>03E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, B 050</td></tr><tr><td>2.69 ± 0.41<sup>+0.61</sup><sub>-0.64</sub></td><td>8 BEHRENS</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.5 ± 0.4<sup>+0.7</sup><sub>-0.9</sub></td><td>9 ALEXANDER</td><td>96T</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by BEHRENS 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.1</td><td>90</td><td>10 BEAN</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ The signal events are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in the fully hadronic decays.

² $B^+$ and $B^0$ decays combined assuming isospin symmetry. Systematic errors include both experimental and form-factor uncertainties.

³ The $B^0$ and $B^+$ results are combined assuming the isospin, B lifetimes, and relative charged/neutral B production at the $\Gamma(4S)$.

⁴ The signal events are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in the semileptonic mode $B \to D^(*) \ell^+ \nu_\ell$.

⁵ Averaging with ALEXANDER 96T results including experimental and theoretical correlations considered, BEHRENS 00 reports systematic errors $+0.33 \pm 0.46$ and $-0.41$, where the second error is theoretical model dependence. We combine these in quadrature.

⁶ ATHAR 03 reports systematic errors $+0.47 \pm 0.50$ and $-0.41 \pm 0.01$, which are experimental systematic, systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the signal, and systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the cross-feed modes, respectively. We combine these in quadrature.

⁷ Uses isospin constraints and extrapolation to all electron energies according to five different form-factor calculations. The second error combines the systematic and theoretical uncertainties in quadrature.

⁸ BEHRENS 00 reports $+0.35 \pm 0.40$ and $-0.50$, where the second error is the theoretical model dependence. We combine these in quadrature. $B^+$ and $B^0$ decays combined using isospin symmetry: $\Gamma(B^0 \to \rho^- \ell^+ \nu) = 2\Gamma(B^+ \to \rho^0 \ell^+ \nu) \approx 2\Gamma(B^+ \to \omega \ell^+ \nu)$. No evidence for $\omega \ell \nu$ is reported.

⁹ ALEXANDER 96T reports $+0.5 \pm 0.7$ and $-0.5 \pm 0.5$ where the second error is the theoretical model dependence. We combine these in quadrature. $B^+$ and $B^0$ decays combined using isospin symmetry: $\Gamma(B^0 \to \rho^- \ell^+ \nu) = 2\Gamma(B^+ \to \rho^0 \ell^+ \nu) \approx 2\Gamma(B^+ \to \omega \ell^+ \nu)$. No evidence for $\omega \ell \nu$ is reported.

¹⁰ BEAN 93e limit set using ISGW Model. Using isospin and the quark model to combine $\Gamma(\rho^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell)$ and $\Gamma(\omega \ell^+ \nu_\ell)$ with this result, they obtain a limit $(1.6-2.7) \times 10^{-4}$ at 90% CL for $B^+ \to (\omega \text{ or } \rho^0) \ell^+ \nu_\ell$. The range corresponds to the ISGW, WSB, and KS models. An upper limit on $|V_{ub}/V_{cb}| < 0.08-0.13$ at 90% CL is derived as well.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE 2.45±0.32 (Error scaled by 1.6)

<figure><img src="image_597.png" /></figure>

$\Gamma(\rho^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$ (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)

$$ \Gamma(\pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{23}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.50 ± 0.06 OUR EVALUATION

1.46 ± 0.04 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>1.49 ± 0.09 ± 0.07</td><td>1 SIBIDANOV</td><td>13</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.47 ± 0.05 ± 0.06</td><td>2,3 LEES</td><td>12AA</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.41 ± 0.05 ± 0.07</td><td>4 DEL-AMO-SA..11C</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.49 ± 0.04 ± 0.07</td><td>2 HA</td><td>11</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.54 ± 0.17 ± 0.09</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>08AV</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.37 ± 0.15 ± 0.11</td><td>5,6 ADAM</td><td>07</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.38 ± 0.19 ± 0.14</td><td>7 HOKUUE</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.53 ± 0.18 ± 0.12</td><td>1,8 CAO</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.42 ± 0.05 ± 0.08</td><td>2 DEL-AMO-SA..11F</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 12AA</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.46 ± 0.07 ± 0.08</td><td>9 AUBERT</td><td>07J</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11F</td></tr><tr><td>1.33 ± 0.17 ± 0.11</td><td>10 AUBERT, B</td><td>06K</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AV</td></tr><tr><td>1.38 ± 0.10 ± 0.18</td><td>11 AUBERT, B</td><td>05O</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11C</td></tr><tr><td>1.33 ± 0.18 ± 0.13</td><td>12 ATHAR</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by ADAM 07</td></tr><tr><td>1.8 ± 0.4 ± 0.4</td><td>13 ALEXANDER</td><td>96T</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by ATHAR 03</td></tr></table>

¹ The signal events are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in the fully hadronic decays.

² Uses loose neutrino reconstruction technique. Assumes $B(\Gamma(4S) \to B^+ B^-) = (51.6 \pm 0.9)\%$ and $B(\Gamma(4S) \to B^0 B^0) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

³ Reports also a branching fraction value $B(B^0 \to \pi^- \ell^+ \nu) = (1.45 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-4}$ from the decays of $B^+$ and $B^0$ that are combined using the isospin symmetry relation.

⁴ Using the isospin symmetry relation, $B^+$ and $B^0$ branching fractions are combined.

⁵ The $B^0$ and $B^+$ results are combined assuming the isospin, B lifetimes, and relative charged/neutral B production at the $\Gamma(4S)$.

⁶ Also report the rate for $q^2 > 16 \text{ GeV}^2$ of $(0.41 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-4}$ from which they obtain $|V_{ub}| = 3.6 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.2^{+0.6}_{-0.4}$ (last error is from theory).

⁷ The signal events are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in the semileptonic mode $B \to D^(*) \ell^+ \nu_\ell$.

⁸ This analysis provides the inclusive and exclusive measurement of $|V_{ub}|$.

⁹ The analysis uses events in which the signal B decays are reconstructed with an innovative loose neutrino reconstruction technique.

¹⁰ The signals are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in a semileptonic or hadronic decay. The $B^0$ and $B^+$ results are combined assuming the isospin symmetry.

¹¹ $B^+$ and $B^0$ decays combined assuming isospin symmetry. Systematic errors include both experimental and form-factor uncertainties.

¹² ATHAR 03 reports systematic errors $0.11 \pm 0.01 \pm 0.07$, which are experimental systematic, systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the signal, and systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the cross-feed modes, respectively. We combine these in quadrature.

¹³ ALEXANDER 96T gives systematic errors $\pm 0.3 \pm 0.2$ where the second error reflects the estimated model dependence. We combine these in quadrature. Assumes isospin symmetry: $\Gamma(B^0 \to \pi^- \ell^+ \nu) = 2 \times \Gamma(B^+ \to \pi^0 \ell^+ \nu)$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{-} \mu^{+} \nu_{\mu})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{24}/\Gamma $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

seen

¹ ALBRECHT 91C ARG

¹In ALBRECHT 91C, one event is fully reconstructed providing evidence for the b → u transition.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{-} \tau^{+} \nu_{\tau})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

CL%

$$ <2.5 \times 10^{-4} $$

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ 90 \quad 16 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^{\pm}X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{26}/\Gamma $$

$$ 0.78 \pm 0.08 $$

DOCUMENT ID

96D ARG

$$ 1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 96 \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

¹Average multiplicity.

$$ \Gamma(D^{0}X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{27}/\Gamma $$

$$ 0.081 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.005 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.063 \pm 0.019 \pm 0.005 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT, BE} \quad 04B \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT} \quad 07N $$

¹Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D^{0}X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{28}/\Gamma $$

$$ 0.474 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.019 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.511 \pm 0.031 \pm 0.028 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT, BE} \quad 04B \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT} \quad 07N $$

¹Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D^{0}X)/[\Gamma(D^{0}X) + \Gamma(D^{0}X)] $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{27}/(\Gamma_{27} + \Gamma_{28}) $$

$$ 0.146 \pm 0.022 \pm 0.006 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.110 \pm 0.031 \pm 0.008 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT, BE} \quad 04B \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT} \quad 07N $$

$$ \Gamma(D^{+}X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{29}/\Gamma $$

$$ <0.039 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ 90 \quad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <0.051 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

$$ 90 \quad 1 \text{ AUBERT, BE} \quad 04B \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT} \quad 07N $$

¹Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D^{-}X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{30}/\Gamma $$

$$ 0.369 \pm 0.016 \pm 0.030 \pm 0.027 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.397 \pm 0.030 \pm 0.040 \pm 0.038 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT, BE} \quad 04B \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT} \quad 07N $$

¹Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D^{+}X)/[\Gamma(D^{+}X) + \Gamma(D^{-}X)] $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{29}/(\Gamma_{29} + \Gamma_{30}) $$

$$ 0.058 \pm 0.028 \pm 0.006 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.055 \pm 0.040 \pm 0.006 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT, BE} \quad 04B \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT} \quad 07N $$

$$ \Gamma(D_{S}^{+}X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{31}/\Gamma $$

$$ 0.103 \pm 0.012 \pm 0.017 \pm 0.014 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.109 \pm 0.021 \pm 0.039 \pm 0.024 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT, BE} \quad 04B \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT} \quad 07N $$

¹Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D_{S}^{-}X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{32}/\Gamma $$

$$ <0.026 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ 90 \quad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <0.087 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

$$ 90 \quad 1 \text{ AUBERT, BE} \quad 04B \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT} \quad 07N $$

¹Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D_{S}^{+}X)/[\Gamma(D_{S}^{+}X) + \Gamma(D_{S}^{-}X)] $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{31}/(\Gamma_{31} + \Gamma_{32}) $$

$$ 0.879 \pm 0.066 \pm 0.005 $$

AUBERT

07N BABR

$$ \text{AUBERT, BE} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.733 \pm 0.092 \pm 0.010 $$

AUBERT, BE

04B BABR

Repl. by AUBERT 07N

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_{c}^{+}X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{33}/\Gamma $$

$$ <0.031 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ \text{AUBERT, BE} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <0.038 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

Repl. by AUBERT 07N

¹Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_{c}^{+}X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{34}/\Gamma $$

$$ 0.05 \pm 0.010 \pm 0.019 \pm 0.011 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ \text{AUBERT, BE} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.049 \pm 0.017 \pm 0.018 \pm 0.011 $$

AUBERT, BE

04B BABR

Repl. by AUBERT 07N

¹Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_{c}^{+}X)/[\Gamma(\Lambda_{c}^{+}X) + \Gamma(\Lambda_{c}^{-}X)] $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{33}/(\Gamma_{33} + \Gamma_{34}) $$

$$ 0.243 \pm 0.119 \pm 0.121 $$

AUBERT

07N BABR

$$ \text{AUBERT, BE} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.286 \pm 0.142 \pm 0.007 $$

AUBERT, BE

04B BABR

Repl. by AUBERT 07N

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\chi}_{c}^{0}X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{35}/\Gamma $$

$$ 0.947 \pm 0.030 \pm 0.045 \pm 0.040 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ \text{AUBERT, BE} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 1.039 \pm 0.051 \pm 0.063 \pm 0.058 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

Repl. by AUBERT 07N

¹Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(cX)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{36}/\Gamma $$

$$ 0.246 \pm 0.024 \pm 0.021 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ \text{AUBERT, BE} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.237 \pm 0.036 \pm 0.041 \pm 0.027 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

Repl. by AUBERT 07N

¹Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\chi}_{c}/cX)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{37}/\Gamma $$

$$ 1.193 \pm 0.030 \pm 0.053 \pm 0.049 $$

DOCUMENT ID

07N BABR

$$ \text{AUBERT, BE} \quad 07N \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 1.276 \pm 0.062 \pm 0.088 \pm 0.074 $$

DOCUMENT ID

04B BABR

Repl. by AUBERT 07N

¹Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D^{-} \pi^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

EVENTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$$ \Gamma_{38}/\Gamma $$

2.51 ± 0.08 OUR FIT

2.56 ± 0.08 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 2.48 \pm 0.01 \pm 0.10 $$

WAHEED

22 BELL

$$ \text{WAHEED, BE} \quad 22 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

$$ 2.55 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.16 $$

1 AUBERT

07H BABR

$$ \text{1 AUBERT, BE} \quad 07H \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

$$ 3.03 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.23 $$

2 ALBERT, BE

06J BABR

$$ \text{2 ALBERT, BE} \quad 06J \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

$$ 2.68 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.24 $$

1,3 AHMED

02b CLE2

$$ \text{2 AHMED, CLE2} \quad 02b \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

$$ 2.7 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.5 $$

4 BORTOLETTTO92

CLE0 CLE0

$$ \text{4 BORTOLETTTO92, CLE0} \quad 90J \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

$$ 4.8 \pm 1.1 \pm 1.1 $$

22 CLE2

22 CLE2

$$ \text{5 ALBRECHT, BE} \quad 90J \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

$$ 5.1 \pm 2.8 \pm 1.3 \pm 1.2 $$

4 BEBEK

87 CLE0

$$ \text{6 BEBEK, BE} \quad 87 \quad \text{CLE0} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 2.73 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.05 $$

1,7 AUBERT, BE

04O BABR

Repl. by AUBERT 07H

$$ 2.83 \pm 0.42 \pm 0.05 $$

81 ALAM

94 CLE2

Repl. by AHMED 02B

$$ 3.1 \pm 1.3 \pm 1.0 $$

7 ALBRECHT

88K ARG

$$ \text{8 ALBRECHT, ARG} \quad 88K \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Uses a missing-mass method. Does not depend on D branching fractions or B⁺/B⁰ production rates.
³AHMED 02B reports an additional uncertainty on the branching ratios to account for 4.5% uncertainty on relative production of B⁰ and B⁺, which is not included here.

⁴BORTOLETTO 92 assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.

⁵ALBRECHT 88k assumes $B^0\bar{B}^0: B^+B^-$ production ratio is 45:55. Superseded by ALBRECHT 90J which assumes 50:50.

⁶BEBEK 87 value has been updated in BERKELMAN 91 to use same assumptions as noted for BORTOLETTO 92.

⁷AUBERT, B 04 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^+ \to K_5^0\pi^+)] = (42.7 \pm 2.1 \pm 2.2) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^+ \to K_5^0\pi^+) = (1.562 \pm 0.031) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁸ALAM 94 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^+ \to K^-2\pi^+)] = (0.265 \pm 0.032 \pm 0.023) \times 10^{-3}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^+ \to K^-2\pi^+) = (9.38 \pm 0.16) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub>)/Γ(D<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.9±1.0±0.9</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>09E</td><td>CDF ρp at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>ρ<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0076±0.0012 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0075±0.0013±0.0001</td><td>1 ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.009±0.005±0.003</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>90J</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.022±0.012±0.009</td><td>6</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>88K ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">1 ALAM 94 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^-\rho^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^+ \to K^-2\rho^+)] = (0.000704 \pm 0.000096 \pm 0.000070]$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^+ \to K^-2\rho^+) = (9.38 \pm 0.16) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).</td></tr></tbody></table>

²ALBRECHT 88k assumes $B^0\bar{B}^0: B^+B^-$ production ratio is 45:55. Superseded by ALBRECHT 90J which assumes 50:50.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.9±0.7±0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>05B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.5±0.7 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.6±0.6±0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>05B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.7±1.5±1.0</td><td>1 MAHAPATRA</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>ωπ<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0028±0.0005±0.0004</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>01B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S). The signal is consistent with all observed $\omega\pi^+$ having proceeded through the $\rho^+/\pi^0$ resonance at mass 1349 $\pm 25_{-10}^{+5}$ MeV and width 547 $\pm 86_{-46}^{+45}$ MeV.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.19±0.20 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8.19±0.20±0.23</td><td>WAHEED</td><td>22</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>8.22±0.11±0.25</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13P</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6.8±1.5±0.7</td><td>ABE</td><td>01I</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.9±1.1±0.5</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>R<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 DRUTSKOY</td><td>02 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.8±1.1±1.5</td><td>1 DRUTSKOY</td><td>02 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.8 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8.95 ± 0.15 ± 0.52</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>8.4 ± 0.4 ± 0.8</td><td>2 KUZMIN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>8.0 ± 0.6 ± 1.5</td><td>2,3 SATPATHY</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>Repl. by KUZMIN 07</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 16</td><td>90</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 70</td><td>90</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;340</td><td>90</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>700 ± 500</td><td>5</td><td>83 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper. AAIJ 15y reports $B(D^0 \to D^0\pi^+\pi^-) = (8.46 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.49) \times 10^{-4}$ in the kinematic region $m(D^0\pi^+) > 2.1$ GeV which we corrected to the full phase-space dividing by 0.945 from Belle.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³ No assumption about the intermediate mechanism is made in the analysis.

⁴ BORTOLETTO 92 assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D. The product branching fraction into $D_0^*(2340)\pi$ followed by $D_0^*(2340) \to D^0\pi$ is < 0.0001 at 90% CL and into $D_2^*(2460)$ followed by $D_2^*(2460) \to D^0\pi$ is < 0.0004 at 90% CL.

⁵ BEBEK 87 assume the T(4S) decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%. $B(D^0 \to K^+\pi^+) = (4.2 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.4)\%$ and $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+\pi^-) = (9.1 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.8)\%$ were used.

⁶ Corrected by us using assumptions: $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = (0.042 \pm 0.006)$ and $B(T(4S) \to B^0\bar{B}^0) = 50\%$. The product branching ratio is $B(D^0 \to D^0\pi^-)B(D^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (0.39 \pm 0.26) \times 10^{-2}$.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>*(2010)</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.66±0.07 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.62±0.02±0.09</td><td>1 KROHN</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.79±0.08±0.17</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.48±0.34±0.08</td><td>3,4 AUBERT, BE</td><td>06J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.81±0.24±0.05</td><td>5 BRANDENB... 98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.6 ± 0.3 ± 0.4</td><td>6 ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.37±0.96±0.02</td><td>7 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.36±0.88±0.02</td><td>8 ALBRECHT</td><td>90J ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.36<sup>+1.50</sup><sub>-1.10</sub>±0.02</td><td>9 BEBEK</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>10 ±4 ±1</td><td>8</td><td>10 AKERS</td><td>94J OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>2.7 ±1.4 ±1.0</td><td>5</td><td>11 ALBRECHT</td><td>87C ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.5 ±2 ±2</td><td>12 ALBRECHT</td><td>86F ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>17 ±5 ±5</td><td>41</td><td>13 GILES</td><td>84 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ KROHN 23 reports $(2.623 \pm 0.016 \pm 0.086) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+)/[B(D^*(2010)^- \to B^0\bar{B}^0)]]$ assuming $B(T(4S) \to B^0\bar{B}^0) = 0.486 \pm 0.006$.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³AUBERT, BE 06j reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+)/[B(D^0 \to D^-\pi^+)] = 0.99 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.08$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to D^-\pi^+) = (2.51 \pm 0.08) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ Uses a missing-mass method. Does not depend on D branching fractions or B⁺/B⁰ production rates.

⁵ BRANDENBURG 98 assume equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at T(4S) and use the D* reconstruction technique. The first error is their experiment's error and the second error is the systematic error from the PDG 96 value of $B(D^* \to D_\pi)$.

⁶ ALAM 94 assume equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S) and use the CLEO II B($D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+$) and absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) \text{ and the PDG 1992 } B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+\pi^0)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) \text{ and } B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^-)$.

⁷ BORTOLETTO 92 reports $(4.0 \pm 1.0 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+)/[B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = 0.57 \pm 0.06$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = (67.7 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.

⁸ALBRECHT 90j reports $(2.8 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+)/[B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = 0.57 \pm 0.06$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = (67.7 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.

⁹ BEBEK 87 reports $(2.8^{+1.5}_{-1.2} \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+)/[B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = 0.57 \pm 0.06$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = (67.7 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Updated in BERKELMAN 91 to use same assumptions as noted for BORTOLETTO 92 and ALBRECHT 90j.

¹⁰ Assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = 0.217$ and 38% $B_d$ production fraction.

¹¹ALBRECHT 87c use PDG 86 branching ratios for D and D* (2010) and assume $B(T(4S) \to B^+B^-) = 55\%$ and $B(T(4S) \to B^0\bar{B}^0) = 45\%$. Superseded by ALBRECHT 90J.

¹² Assumes 86f uses pseudomass that is independent of D⁰ and D⁺ branching ratios.

¹³ Assumes $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = 0.60^{+0.08}_{-0.15}$. Assumes $B(T(4S) \to B^0\bar{B}^0) = 0.40 \pm 0.02$ Does not depend on D branching ratios.
$B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = (67.7 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$.

⁶ALBRECHT 90J reports $0.012 \pm 0.003 \pm 0.004$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = 0.57 \pm 0.06$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = (67.7 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$.

⁷ALBRECHT 87c use PDG 86 branching ratios for $D$ and $D^*(2010)$ and assume $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^+B^-) = 55\%$ and $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^0\bar{B}^0) = 45\%$. Superseded by ALBRECHT 90.

⁸BEBEK 87 value has been updated in BERKELMAN 91 to use same assumptions as noted for BORTOLETTO 92.

$$ \Gamma((D^*(2010)^-\pi^+\pi^-)\text{nonresonant})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{62}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0000±0.0019±0.0016</td><td>1 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BORTOLETTO 92 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$ and $D^*(2010)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^-\pi^+\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{63}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.00573±0.00317±0.00004</td><td>1 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BORTOLETTO 92 reports $0.0068 \pm 0.0032 \pm 0.0021$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = 0.57 \pm 0.06$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = (67.7 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^-a_1(1260)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{64}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0130±0.0027</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

0.0126±0.0020±0.0022 1,2 ALAM 94 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

0.0152±0.0070±0.0001 3 BORTOLETT092 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

¹ALAM 94 value is twice their $\Gamma(D^*(2010)^-\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ value based on their observation that the three pions are dominantly in the $a_1(1260)$ mass range 1.0 to 1.6 GeV.

²ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)$ and absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and the PDG 1992 $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+\pi^0)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and $B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^-)$.

³BORTOLETTO 92 reports $0.018 \pm 0.006 \pm 0.006$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-a_1(1260)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = 0.57 \pm 0.06$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = (67.7 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1(2420)^0\pi^-\pi^+, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^*-\pi^+)/\Gamma(D^*(2010)^-\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{65}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>(2.04±0.42±0.22) × 10<sup>-2</sup></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13A0 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^-K^+\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(D^*(2010)^-\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{66}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>(6.47±0.37±0.35) × 10<sup>-2</sup></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13A0 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^-\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{67}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0176±0.0027</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

0.0172±0.0014±0.0024 1 ALEXANDER 01B CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

0.0345±0.0181±0.0003 28 ALBRECHT 90J ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$. The signal is consistent with all observed $\omega\pi^+$ having proceeded through the $\rho^+$ resonance at mass $1349 \pm 25^{+10}_{-5}$ MeV and width $547 \pm 86^{+46}_{-45}$ MeV.

²ALBRECHT 90J reports $0.041 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.016$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = 0.57 \pm 0.06$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = (67.7 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*-3\pi^+2\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{68}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.72±0.59±0.71</td><td>1 MAJUMDER 04 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^-\omega\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{69}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.46±0.18</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

2.31±0.11±0.14 1 MATVIENKO 15 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

2.88±0.21±0.31 1 AUBERT 06L BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

2.9 ±0.3 ±0.4 1,2 ALEXANDER 01B CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²The signal is consistent with all observed $\omega\pi^+$ having proceeded through the $\rho^+$ resonance at mass $1349 \pm 25^{+10}_{-5}$ MeV and width $547 \pm 86^{+46}_{-45}$ MeV.

³Obtained by fitting the events with $\cos\theta_D^* < 0.5$ and scaling up the result by a factor of 4/3. No interference effects between $B^0 \to D^+\pi^0$ and $D^+\omega\pi^0$ are assumed.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1(2430)^0\omega, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^*-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{70}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ \Gamma_{70}^{+0.8}_{-0.4} \text{ OUR AVERAGE} $$

2.5±0.4±0.8 1,2 MATVIENKO 15 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

4.1±1.2±1.1 3 AUBERT 06L BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$.

²The measurement is obtained by amplitude analysis of $B^0 \to D^*-\omega\pi^+$. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature experimental systematic and model uncertainties.

³Obtained by fitting the events with $\cos\theta_D^* < 0.5$ and scaling up the result by a factor of 4/3. No interference effects between $B^0 \to D^+\pi^0$ and $D^+\omega\pi^0$ are assumed.

$$ \Gamma(D^*-\rho(1450)^+, \rho^+ \to \omega\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{71}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.07±0.15±0.40<br/>-0.31±0.13</td><td>1,2 MATVIENKO 15</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtained by amplitude analysis of $B^0 \to D^*-\omega\pi^+$. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature experimental systematic and model uncertainties.

²Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1(2420)^0\omega, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^*-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{72}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.7±0.2±0.1</td><td>1,2 MATVIENKO 15</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtained by amplitude analysis of $B^0 \to D^*-\omega\pi^+$. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature experimental systematic and model uncertainties.

²Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2(2460)^0\omega, \bar{D}_2^0 \to D^*-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{73}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.4±0.1±0.1</td><td>1,2 MATVIENKO 15</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtained by amplitude analysis of $B^0 \to D^*-\omega\pi^+$. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature experimental systematic and model uncertainties.

²Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*-b_1(1235)^+, b_1^+ \to \omega\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{74}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.7 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 MATVIENKO 15</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^{**-}\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{75}/\Gamma $$

$D^{**-}$ represents an excited state with mass $2.2 < M < 2.8$ GeV/c².

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.9±0.9±0.1</td><td>1,2 AUBERT, BE 06J BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT, BE 06J reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \bar{D}^{**-}\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to D^-\pi^+)] = 0.77 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.29$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to D^-\pi^+) = (2.51 \pm 0.08) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Uses a missing-mass method. Does not depend on $D$ branching fractions or $B^+/B^0$ production rates.

$$ \Gamma(D_1(2420)^-\pi^+, D_1^- \to D^-\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{76}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ 0.99^{+0.20}_{-0.25} \text{ OUR FIT} $$

0.89±0.15±0.17 1 ABE 05A BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D_1(2420)^-\pi^+, D_1^- \to D^-\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(D^-\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{76}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.7±0.4</td><td colspan="3">OUR FIT</td></tr></tbody></table>

2.1±0.5±0.3 1 AUBERT 06J LHCB pp at 7 TeV

$$ \Gamma(D_1(2420)^-\pi^+, D_1^- \to D^*-\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{77}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.33</td><td>90</td><td>1 ABE 05A BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- \pi^+) \quad \Gamma_{61}/\Gamma_{48} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.64±0.04±0.13</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AO</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_2^*(2460)^- \pi^+, D_2^*^- \to D^0 \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{78}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>2.38±0.16 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>2.44±0.07±0.16</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15Y</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.15±0.17±0.31</td><td>2,3 KUZMIN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;14.7</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1. Result obtained using the isobar formalism. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.

2. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

3. Our second uncertainty combines systematics and model errors quoted in the paper.

$$ \Gamma(D_0^*(2400)^- \pi^+, D_0^*^- \to D^0 \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{79}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.76±0.08 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.77±0.05±0.06</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15Y</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.60±0.13±0.27</td><td>2,3 KUZMIN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Result obtained using the isobar formalism. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.

2. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

3. Our second uncertainty combines systematics and model errors quoted in the paper.

$$ \Gamma(D_2^*(2460)^- \pi^+, D_2^*^- \to D^* \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{80}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.24</td><td>90</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(D_2^*(2460)^- \rho^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{81}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.0049</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. ALAM 94 assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45) and use the CLEO II absolute B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺) and B(D*₂(2460)⁺ → D⁰π⁺) = 30%.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 \bar{D}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{82}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.14±0.06±0.03</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AP</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.43</td><td>90</td><td>2 ADACHI</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.6</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT, B</td><td>06A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1. Uses B(B⁰ → D⁻D⁺) = (2.11 ± 0.31) × 10⁻⁴ and B(B⁺ → D⁰D⁺S) = (10.1 ± 1.7) × 10⁻³.

2. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(D^*0 \bar{D}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{83}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(D^{-} D^{+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{84}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>2.11±0.18 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>2.12±0.16±0.18</td><td>1 ROHRKEN</td><td>12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.97±0.20±0.20</td><td>1 FRATINA</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>2.8 ± 0.4 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.91±0.51±0.30</td><td>1 MAJUMDER</td><td>05</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by FRATINA 07</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;9.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 LIPELES</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;59</td><td>90</td><td>BARATE</td><td>98Q</td><td>ALEC</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;12</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>97</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(D^{\pm} D^{*\mp} (CP-averaged)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{85}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.14±0.29±0.50</td><td></td><td>1 ROHRKEN</td><td>12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(D^{-} D_{S}^{+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{86}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVENTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.0072±0.0008 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.0073±0.0004±0.0007</td><td></td><td>1 ZUPANC</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.0066±0.0014±0.0006</td><td></td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>06N</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.0068±0.0024±0.0006</td><td></td><td>3 GIBAUT</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.010 ± 0.009 ± 0.001</td><td></td><td>4 ALBRECHT</td><td>92G</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.0053±0.0030±0.0005</td><td></td><td>5 BORTOLETT092</td><td></td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.012 ± 0.007</td><td>3</td><td>6 BORTOLETT090</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1. ZUPANC 07 reports (7.5 ± 0.2 ± 1.1) × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D⁻D⁺S) / Γ[Γ(D⁺S → φπ⁺)]] assuming B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.4 ± 0.6) × 10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.5 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2. AUBERT 06N reports (0.64 ± 0.13 ± 0.10) × 10⁻² from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D⁻D⁺S) / Γ[Γ(D⁺S → φπ⁺)]] assuming B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = 0.0462 ± 0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.5 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3. GIBAUT 96 reports 0.0087 ± 0.0024 ± 0.0020 from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D⁻D⁺S) / Γ[Γ(D⁺S → φπ⁺)]] assuming B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.5 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

4. ALBRECHT 92G reports 0.017 ± 0.013 ± 0.006 from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D⁻D⁺S) / Γ[Γ(D⁺S → φπ⁺)]] assuming B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.5 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes PDG 1990 D⁺ branching ratios, e.g., B(D⁺ → K⁻2π⁺) = 7.7 ± 1.0%.

5. BORTOLETT092 reports 0.0080 ± 0.0045 ± 0.0030 from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D⁻D⁺S) / Γ[Γ(D⁺S → φπ⁺)]] assuming B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = 0.030 ± 0.011, which we rescale to our best value B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.5 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.

6. BORTOLETT090 assume B(D₅ → φπ⁺) = 2%. Superseded by BORTOLETT092.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- D_S^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{88}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVENTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.0080±0.0011 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.0073±0.0013±0.0007</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>06N</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.0083±0.0015±0.0007</td><td></td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>03I</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.0088±0.0017±0.0008</td><td></td><td>3 AHMED</td><td>00B</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.008 ± 0.006 ± 0.001</td><td></td><td>4 ALBRECHT</td><td>92G</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.011 ± 0.006 ± 0.001</td><td></td><td>5 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.0072±0.0022±0.0006</td><td>6 GIBAUT</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by AHMED 00B</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.024 ± 0.014</td><td>3</td><td>7 BORTOLETT090</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1. AUBERT 06N reports (0.71 ± 0.13 ± 0.09) × 10⁻² from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D*(2010)⁻D⁺S) / Γ[Γ(D⁺S → φπ⁺)]] assuming B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = 0.0462 ± 0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.5 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2. AUBERT 03I reports 0.0103 ± 0.0014 ± 0.0013 from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D*(2010)⁻D⁺S) / Γ[Γ(D⁺S → φπ⁺)]] assuming B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.5 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3. AHMED 00B reports 0.0110 ± 0.0018 ± 0.0011 from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D*(2010)⁻D⁺S) / Γ[Γ(D⁺S → φπ⁺)]] assuming B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.5 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

4. ALBRECHT 92G reports 0.014 ± 0.010 ± 0.003 from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D*(2010)⁻D⁺S) / Γ[Γ(D⁺S → φπ⁺)]] assuming B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.5 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes PDG 1990 D⁺ and D*(2010)⁺ branching ratios, e.g., B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺) = 3.71 ± 0.25%, B(D⁺ → K⁻2π⁺) = 7.1 ± 1.0%, and B(D*(2010)⁺ → D⁰π⁺) = 55 ± 4%.

5. BORTOLETT092 reports 0.016 ± 0.009 ± 0.006 from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D*(2010)⁻D⁺S) / Γ[Γ(D⁺S → φπ⁺)]] assuming B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = 0.030 ± 0.011, which we rescale to our best value B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.5 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D and D*(2010).

6. GIBAUT 96 reports 0.0093 ± 0.0023 ± 0.0016 from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D*(2010)⁻D⁺S) / Γ[Γ(D⁺S → φπ⁺)]] assuming B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D⁺S → φπ⁺) = (4.5 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

7. BORTOLETT090 assume B(D₅ → φπ⁺) = 2%. Superseded by BORTOLETT092.
$\Gamma(D^*(2010) - D_s^+ - D^0\pi^- - m(D^0\pi^-) > 2.05 \text{ GeV}) / \Gamma(D^0 D_s^+\pi^- - m(D^0\pi^-) > 2.05 \text{ GeV})$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

15.8 ± 1.3 ± 2.4

DOCUMENT ID

1 AAIJ

TECN

23B LHCB

COMMENT

pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹ Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to D^0 D_s^+\pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+\pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$\Gamma(D_2^*(2460) - D_s^+ - D_2^- \to D^0\pi^-) / \Gamma(D^0 D_s^+\pi^- - m(D^0\pi^-) > 2.05 \text{ GeV})$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

22.38 ± 0.88 ± 0.60

DOCUMENT ID

1 AAIJ

TECN

23B LHCB

COMMENT

pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹ Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to D^0 D_s^+\pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+\pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$\Gamma(D_1^*(2600) - D_s^+ - D_1^- \to D^0\pi^-) / \Gamma(D^0 D_s^+\pi^- - m(D^0\pi^-) > 2.05 \text{ GeV})$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

1.35 ± 0.40 ± 0.59

DOCUMENT ID

1 AAIJ

TECN

23B LHCB

COMMENT

pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹ Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to D^0 D_s^+\pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+\pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$\Gamma(D_3^*(2750) - D_s^+ - D_3^- \to D^0\pi^-) / \Gamma(D^0 D_s^+\pi^- - m(D^0\pi^-) > 2.05 \text{ GeV})$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

0.31 ± 0.14 ± 0.17

DOCUMENT ID

1 AAIJ

TECN

23B LHCB

COMMENT

pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹ Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to D^0 D_s^+\pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+\pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$\Gamma(D_1^*(2760) - D_s^+ - D_1^- \to D^0\pi^-) / \Gamma(D^0 D_s^+\pi^- - m(D^0\pi^-) > 2.05 \text{ GeV})$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

0.28 ± 0.25 ± 1.48

DOCUMENT ID

1 AAIJ

TECN

23B LHCB

COMMENT

pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹ Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to D^0 D_s^+\pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+\pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$\Gamma(D_3^*(3000) - D_s^+ - D_3^- \to D^0\pi^-) / \Gamma(D^0 D_s^+\pi^- - m(D^0\pi^-) > 2.05 \text{ GeV})$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

0.45 ± 0.16 ± 0.38

DOCUMENT ID

1 AAIJ

TECN

23B LHCB

COMMENT

pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹ Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to D^0 D_s^+\pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+\pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$\Gamma(T_{cs0}^*(2870) - D^0, T_{cs0}^* \to D_s^+\pi^-) / \Gamma(D^0 D_s^+\pi^- - m(D^0\pi^-) > 2.05 \text{ GeV})$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

2.48 ± 0.67 ± 0.77

DOCUMENT ID

1 AAIJ

TECN

23B LHCB

COMMENT

pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹ Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to D^0 D_s^+\pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+\pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$\Gamma(D^- D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

0.0074 ± 0.0016 OUR AVERAGE

0.0071 ± 0.0016 ± 0.0006

1 AUBERT 06N BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.0078 ± 0.0032 ± 0.0007

2 GIBAUT 96 CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.016 ± 0.012 ± 0.001

3 ALBRECHT 92G ARG $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹ AUBERT 06N reports $(0.69 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.09) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^- D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.0462 \pm 0.0062$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² GIBAUT 96 reports $0.0100 \pm 0.0035 \pm 0.0022$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^- D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.035$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ ALBRECHT 92G reports $0.027 \pm 0.017 \pm 0.009$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^- D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes PDG 1990 $D^+$ branching ratios, e.g., $B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+) = 7.7 \pm 1.0\%$.

$\Gamma(D^*(2010) - D_s^+ / \Gamma_{\text{total}})$

0.0177 ± 0.0014 OUR AVERAGE

0.0173 ± 0.0018 ± 0.0015

1 AUBERT 06N BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.0188 ± 0.0009 ± 0.0017

2 AUBERT 05V BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.0158 ± 0.0027 ± 0.0014

3 AUBERT 03I BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.015 ± 0.004 ± 0.001

4 AHMED 00B CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.016 ± 0.009 ± 0.001

5 ALBRECHT 92G ARG $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.016 ± 0.005 ± 0.001

6 GIBAUT

96 CLE2 Repl. by AHMED 00B

¹ AUBERT 06N reports $(1.68 \pm 0.21 \pm 0.19) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010) - D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.0462 \pm 0.0062$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² A partial reconstruction technique is used and the result is independent of the particle decay rate of $D_s^+$ meson. It also provides a model-independent determination of $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.81 \pm 0.52 \pm 0.38)\%$.

³ AUBERT 03I reports $0.0197 \pm 0.0015 \pm 0.0030$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010) - D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.036$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ AHMED 00B reports $0.0182 \pm 0.0037 \pm 0.0025$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010) - D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.036$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵ ALBRECHT 92G reports $0.026 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.006$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010) - D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes PDG 1990 $D^+$ and $D^*(2010)^+$ branching ratios, e.g., $B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) = 3.71 \pm 0.25\%$, $B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+) = 7.1 \pm 1.0\%$, and $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0 \pi^+) = 55 \pm 4\%$.

⁶ GIBAUT 96 reports $0.0203 \pm 0.0050 \pm 0.0036$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010) - D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.035$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$\Gamma(D^*(2010) - D_s^+) / \Gamma(D^*(2010) - D_s^+)$

2.19 ± 0.08 ± 0.01

DOCUMENT ID

1 AAIJ

TECN

21S LHCB

COMMENT

pp at 13 TeV

¹ AAIJ 21S reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010) - D_s^+) / \Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010) - D_s^+)] \times [B(D_s^+ \to D_s^+) \gamma) = 2.045 \pm 0.022 \pm 0.071$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_s^+ \to D_s^+) \gamma) = (93.6 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$[\Gamma(D^*(2010) - D_s^+) + \Gamma(D^*(2010) - D_s^+)] / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

EVT5

DOCUMENT ID

1 AUBERT

03I BABR

CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

TECN

2 BORTOLETTO90

CLEO

BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

2.40 ± 0.35 ± 0.22

3.3 ± 0.9 ± 0.3

22

¹ AUBERT 03I reports $(3.00 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.39) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010) - D_s^+) + \Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010) - D_s^+)] / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.036$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² BORTOLETTO 90 reports $(7.5 \pm 2.0) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010) - D_s^+) + \Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010) - D_s^+)] / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.02$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$\Gamma(D_{s0}(2317) - K^+, D_{s0}^- \to D_s^- \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵)

4.2 ± 1.4 ± 1.3

DOCUMENT ID

1 DRUTSKOY

05 BELL

COMMENT

$e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹ DRUTSKOY 05 reports $(5.3^{+1.5}_{-1.3} \pm 1.6) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_{s0}(2317) - K^+, D_{s0}^- \to D_s^- \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$\Gamma(D_{s0}(2317) - \pi^+, D_{s0}^- \to D_s^- \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵)

<2.5

DOCUMENT ID

1 DRUTSKOY

05 BELL

COMMENT

$e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457) - K^+, D_{sJ}^- \to D_s^- \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵)

<0.94

DOCUMENT ID

1 DRUTSKOY

05 BELL

COMMENT

$e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

$$ \Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^- \to \pi^+, D_{sJ}^- \to D_s^- \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{101}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.40</td><td>90</td><td>1 DRUTSKOY</td><td>05</td><td>BELL</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_s^- D_s^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{102}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.6 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ZUPANC</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;10</td><td>10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>05F</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="7">¹Assumes equal production of B<sup>+</sup> and B<sup>0</sup> at the T(4S).</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^* - D_s^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{103}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.3 &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>05F</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_s^* - D_s^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{104}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.4 &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>05F</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ D^-, D_{s0}^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{105}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

1.06±0.16 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.00<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.15</sub></td><td>±0.03</td><td>1,2 CHOI</td><td>15A</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.4<sup>+0.5</sup><sub>-0.4</sub></td><td>±0.1</td><td>2,3 AUBERT,B</td><td>04S</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.69<sup>+0.29</sup><sub>-0.24</sub></td><td>±0.06</td><td>2,4 KROKOVNY</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHOI 15A</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹CHOI 15A reports $(10.2^{+1.3}_{-1.2} \pm 1.0 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^*(2317)^+ D^-, D_{s0}^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to K^+ K^- \pi^+)] \times [B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to K^+ K^- \pi^+) = (5.39 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+) = (9.13 \pm 0.19) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best values $B(D_s^+ \to K^+ K^- \pi^+) = (5.37 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+) = (9.38 \pm 0.16) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³AUBERT,B 04s reports $(1.8 \pm 0.4^{+0.7}_{-0.5}) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ D^-, D_{s0}^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴KROKOVNY 03b reports $(0.86^{+0.33}_{-0.26} \times 0.26) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ D^-, D_{s0}^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D_{s0}(2317)^+ D^-, D_{s0}^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{106}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.95</td><td>90</td><td>1 KROKOVNY</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_{s0}(2317)^+ D^*(2010)^-, D_{s0}^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{107}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.5<sup>+0.4</sup><sub>-0.4</sub></td><td>±0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04S</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ D^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{108}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

3.5±1.1 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.6±1.5±0.7</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>06N</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.8<sup>+2.2</sup><sub>-1.6</sub></td><td>±1.1</td><td>2,3 AUBERT,B</td><td>04S</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.9<sup>+1.5</sup><sub>-1.3</sub></td><td>±0.9</td><td>2,4 KROKOVNY</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses a missing-mass method in the events that one of the B mesons is fully reconstructed.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³AUBERT,B 04s reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_{sJ}(2457)^+ D^-, D_{sJ}^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{s1}(2460)^+ \to D_s^{*+} \pi^0)] = (2.3^{+1.0}_{-0.7} \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-3}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_{s1}(2460)^+ \to D_s^{*+} \pi^0) = (48 \pm 11) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴KROKOVNY 03b reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_{sJ}(2457)^+ D^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{s1}(2460)^+ \to D_s^{*+} \pi^0)] = (1.9^{+0.7}_{-0.6} \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-3}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_{s1}(2460)^+ \to D_s^{*+} \pi^0) = (48 \pm 11) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ D^-, D_{sJ}^+ \to D_s^- \gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{109}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

0.65<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.14</sub> OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.64<sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.16</sub></td><td>±0.06</td><td>1,2 AUBERT,B</td><td>04S</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.66<sup>+0.21</sup><sub>-0.19</sub></td><td>±0.06</td><td>1,3 KROKOVNY</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²AUBERT,B 04s reports $(0.8 \pm 0.2^{+0.3}_{-0.2}) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_{sJ}(2457)^+ D^-, D_{sJ}^+ \to D_s^- \gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^- \to \phi \pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^- \to \phi \pi^+) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^- \to \phi \pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³KROKOVNY 03b reports $(0.82^{+0.22}_{-0.19} \pm 0.25) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_{sJ}(2457)^+ D^-, D_{sJ}^+ \to D_s^- \gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^- \to \phi \pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^- \to \phi \pi^+) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^- \to \phi \pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ D^-, D_{sJ}^+ \to D_s^{*+} \gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{110}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.60</td><td>90</td><td>1 KROKOVNY</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ D^-, D_{sJ}^+ \to D_s^- \pi^+ \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{111}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.20</td><td>90</td><td>1 KROKOVNY</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ D^-, D_{sJ}^+ \to D_s^- \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{112}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.36</td><td>90</td><td>1 KROKOVNY</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- D_{sJ}(2457)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{113}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

9.3±2.2 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>8.8±2.0</td><td>±1.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>06N</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>11<sup>+5</sup><sub>-4</sub></td><td>±3</td><td>2,3 AUBERT,B</td><td>04S</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses a missing-mass method in the events that one of the B mesons is fully reconstructed.

²AUBERT,B 04s reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^*(2010)^- D_{sJ}(2457)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{s1}(2460)^+ \to D_s^{*+} \pi^0)] = (5.5 \pm 1.2^{+2.2}_{-1.6}) \times 10^{-3}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_{s1}(2460)^+ \to D_s^{*+} \pi^0) = (48 \pm 11) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ D^*(2010), D_{sJ}^+ \to D_s^- \gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{114}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.3±0.3<sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-0.6</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04S</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^- D_{s1}(2536)^+, D_{s1}^+ \to D^{*0} K^+) + \Gamma(D^{*+} K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{115}/\Gamma = (\Gamma_{116}+\Gamma_{117})/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.75±0.62</td><td>±0.36</td><td>1,2 AUSHEV</td><td>11</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $\Gamma(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0 \pi^0) / \Gamma(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0 \gamma) = 1.74 \pm 0.13$ and $\Gamma(D_{s1}(2536)^+ \to D^*(2007)^0 K^+) / \Gamma(D_{s1}(2536)^+ \to D^*(2010)^+ K^0) = 1.36 \pm 0.2$.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^- D_{s1}(2536)^+, D_{s1}^+ \to D^{*0} K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{116}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.71±0.48</td><td>±0.32</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5</td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03X</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08B</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^- D_{s1}(2536)^+, D_{s1}^+ \to D^{*+} K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{117}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.61±1.03</td><td>±0.31</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).
$$ \begin{gathered} \frac{[\Gamma(D^*(2010)^- D_{S1}(2536)^+, D_{S1}^+ \to D^{*0} K^+) + \Gamma(D^{*+} K^0)]}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \\ \frac{\Gamma_{118}/\Gamma = (\Gamma_{119} + \Gamma_{120})/\Gamma}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \end{gathered} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.01±1.21±0.70</td><td>1,2 AUSHEV</td><td>11</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $\Gamma(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0) / \Gamma(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\gamma) = 1.74 \pm 0.13$ and $\Gamma(D_{S1}(2536)^+ \to D^{*0}(2007)^0 K^+) / \Gamma(D_{S1}(2536)^+ \to D^{*0}(2010)^0 K^0) = 1.36 \pm 0.2$.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D^*(2010)^- D_{S1}(2536)^+, D_{S1}^+ \to D^{*0} K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{119}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.32±0.88±0.66</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08B</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7</td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08B</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D^{*-} D_{S1}(2536)^+, D_{S1}^+ \to D^{*+} K^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{120}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.00±1.51±0.67</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08B</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D^{-} D_{S,J}(2573)^+, D_{S,J}^+ \to D^{0} K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{121}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.4±1.7±0.5</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>15c</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;10</td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D^{*}(2010)^- D_{s,J}(2573)^+, D_{s,J}^+ \to D^{0} K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{122}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2</td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D^{-} D_{s,J}(2700)^+, D_{s,J}^+ \to D^{0} K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{123}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.14±0.96±0.69</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>15c</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D^{+} \pi^{-}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{124}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.3±1.2±0.2</td><td>1,2 DAS</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ DAS 10 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to D^-\pi^-)] = (2.92 \pm 0.38 \pm 0.31) \times 10^{-4}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to D^-\pi^+) = (2.51 \pm 0.08) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Derived using $\tan(\theta_C) f_D/f_{D_S} \sqrt{B(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-)/B(B^0 \to D^-\pi^+)}$ by assuming the flavor SU(3) symmetry, where $\theta_C$ is the Cabibbo angle, $f_D(f_{D_S})$ is the $D(D_S)$ meson decay constant.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{125}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5">20.3±1.8 OUR FIT</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">21.6±2.6 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>19.9±2.6±1.8</td><td>1 DAS</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>25 ±4 ±2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AJ</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.</td></tr><tr><td>14.0±3.5±1.3</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07K</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AJ</td></tr><tr><td>25 ±9 ±2</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>03D</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07K</td></tr><tr><td>19 +9/7 ±2</td><td>4 KROKOVNY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by DAS 10</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 220</td><td>5 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1300</td><td>6 BORTOLETTO</td><td>90</td><td>CLE0 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>14.0±3.5±1.3</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07K</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AJ</td></tr><tr><td>25 ±9 ±2</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>03D</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07K</td></tr><tr><td>19 +9/7 ±2</td><td>4 KROKOVNY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by DAS 10</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;220</td><td>90</td><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1300</td><td>90</td><td>BORTOLETTO</td><td>90</td><td>CLE0 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">² AUBERT 07K reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (0.63 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">³ AUBERT 03D reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (1.13 \pm 0.33 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">⁴ KROKOVNY 02 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (0.86 \pm 0.37 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">⁵ ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 270 \times 10^{-6}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">⁶ BORTOLETTO 90 assume $B(D_S \to \phi\pi^+) = 2\%$.</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

² AUBERT 07K reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (0.63 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ AUBERT 03D reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (1.13 \pm 0.33 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ KROKOVNY 02 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (0.86 \pm 0.37 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵ ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 270 \times 10^{-6}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

⁶ BORTOLETTO 90 assume $B(D_S \to \phi\pi^+) = 2\%$.

$$ \frac{[\Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^-) + \Gamma(D_s^- K^+)] / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{(\Gamma_{125} + \Gamma_{135}) / \Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 1.7 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) + \Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^- K^+)] / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma(D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{125}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.1±0.7 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>7.7±0.7±0.6</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{126}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.1 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.4.</td></tr><tr><td>1.75±0.34±0.20</td><td></td><td>1 JOSHI</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.6 +0.5/0.4 ±0.2</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AJ</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.9 ±0.7 ±0.3</td><td></td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07K</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AJ</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 4.1</td><td>90</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>03D</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07K</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;40</td><td>90</td><td>3 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

² AUBERT 07K reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (1.32 \pm 0.27 \pm 0.15) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 44 \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

² AUBERT 07K reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (1.32 \pm 0.27 \pm 0.15) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 44 \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{[\Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^-) + \Gamma(D_s^- K^+)] / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{(\Gamma_{126} + \Gamma_{136}) / \Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 1.2 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\pi^-) + \Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^- K^+)] / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \rho^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{127}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 2.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AJ</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;130</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 50</td><td>90</td><td>3 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

² ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 2.2 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\rho^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

³ ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 6.6 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\rho^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \rho^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{128}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.1 +1.3/1.2 ±0.4</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AJ</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;150</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 60</td><td>90</td><td>3 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

² ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 2.5 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\rho^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

³ ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 7.4 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_S^+\rho^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \rho_0^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{129}/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>06x</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
$$\Gamma(D_s^+ a_0^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{130}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

<3.6

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 06\text{x} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

$$\Gamma(D_s^+ a_1(1260^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{131}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-3}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

<2.1 × 10⁻³

$1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 93\text{E} \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

¹ALBRECHT 93E reports < 3.5 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^+ a_1(1260^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$\Gamma(D_s^+ a_1(1260^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{132}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-3}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

<1.7 × 10⁻³

$1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 93\text{E} \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

¹ALBRECHT 93E reports < 2.9 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^+ a_1(1260^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$\Gamma(D_s^+ a_2^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{133}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

<19

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 06\text{x} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

$$\Gamma(D_s^+ a_2^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{134}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

<20

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 06\text{x} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

$$\Gamma(D_s^- K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{135}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

27 ± 5 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 2.7.

22 ± 5 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.8.

19.1 ± 2.4 ± 1.7

$1 \text{ DAS} \quad 10 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

29 ± 4 ± 2

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 08\text{AJ} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

27 ± 5 ± 2

$2 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07\text{K} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT } 08\text{AJ}$

26 ± 10 ± 2

$3 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{D} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT } 07\text{K}$

36 ± 11 ± 3

$4 \text{ KROKOVNY} \quad 02 \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by DAS } 10$

< 190

$5 \text{ ALEXANDER} \quad 93\text{B} \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

<1300

$6 \text{ BORTOLETTO} \quad 90 \quad \text{CLEO} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

²AUBERT 07K reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (1.21 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$.

³AUBERT 03D reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (1.16 \pm 0.36 \pm 0.24) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$.

⁴KROKOVNY 02 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (1.61 \pm 0.45 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$.

⁵ALEXANDER 93B reports < 230 × 10⁻⁶ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

⁶BORTOLETTO 90 assume $B(D_s \to \phi\pi^+) = 2\%$.

$$\Gamma(D_s^- K^+)/\Gamma(D_s^- \pi^+)^+$$

$\Gamma_{135}/\Gamma_{38}$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-2}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

1.09 ± 0.19 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 2.7.

1.29 ± 0.05 ± 0.08

$\text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT}$

$\text{AAIJ} \quad 15\text{AC} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV}$

$$\Gamma(D_s^* K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{136}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

2.19 ± 0.30 OUR AVERAGE

2.02 ± 0.33 ± 0.22

2.4 ± 0.4 ± 0.2

$1 \text{ JOSHI} \quad 10 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 08\text{AJ} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

2.2 ± 0.6 ± 0.2

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{D} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT } 07\text{K}$

$3 \text{ ALEXANDER} \quad 93\text{B} \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

< 2.5

<14

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

²AUBERT 07K reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (0.97 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.12) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$.

³ALEXANDER 93B reports < 17 × 10⁻⁵ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$\Gamma(D_s(2536)\bar{K}^{\pm}, D_s^- \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^-)/\Gamma(D_s^0 K^+ K^-)$$

$\Gamma_{137}/\Gamma_{49}$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-2}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

8.4 ± 0.3 ± 0.6

$\text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT}$

$\text{AAIJ} \quad 23\text{AY} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV}$

$$\Gamma(D_s^- K^*(892)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{138}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

$3.5^{+1.0}_{-0.9} \pm 0.4$

$\text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT}$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 08\text{AJ} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<280

$2 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 93\text{E} \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

< 80

$3 \text{ ALEXANDER} \quad 93\text{B} \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

²ALBRECHT 93E reports < 4.6 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- K^*(892^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

³ALEXANDER 93B reports < 9.7 × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- K^*(892^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$\Gamma(D_s^- K^*(892^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{139}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

$3.2^{+1.4}_{-1.2} \pm 0.4$

$\text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT}$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 08\text{AJ} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<350

$2 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 93\text{E} \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

< 90

$3 \text{ ALEXANDER} \quad 93\text{B} \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

²ALBRECHT 93E reports < 5.8 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- K^*(892^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

³ALEXANDER 93B reports < 11.0 × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- K^*(892^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$\Gamma(D_s^- \pi^0 K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{140}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

0.97 ± 0.14 OUR AVERAGE

0.94 ± 0.12 ± 0.10

$1 \text{ WIECHCZYNY} \dots 15 \text{ BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

1.10 ± 0.26 ± 0.20

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 08\text{G} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<40

$2 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 93\text{E} \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

²ALBRECHT 93E reports < 7.3 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- \pi^+ K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$\Gamma(D_s^- \pi^+ K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{141}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

<1.10

$\text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT}$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 08\text{G} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<25

$2 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 93\text{E} \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45)$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

²ALBRECHT 93E reports < 4.2 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- \pi^+ K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$\Gamma(D_s^- K^+ \pi^+ \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{142}/\Gamma$

$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \quad \text{CL}\%$

$1.71 \pm 0.31 \pm 0.34$

$\text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT}$

$1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 12\text{AX} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV}$

¹AAIJ 12AX reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to D_s^- K^+ \pi^+ \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(B^0_s \to D_s^- K^+ \pi^+ \pi^-)] = 0.54 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.07$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0_s \to D_s^- K^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) = (3.2 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.