$$ \Gamma(D_5^- \pi^+ K^*(892)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{143}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \quad \text{CL \%} \quad 90 $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 93E \quad ARG \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

1 ALBRECHT 93E reports < 5.0 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D_s⁻ π⁺ K⁺(892)⁰)/Γ_{total}] × [B(B⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

$$ \Gamma(D_s^* \pi^+ K^*(892)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{144}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \quad \text{CL \%} \quad 90 $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 93E \quad ARG \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

1 ALBRECHT 93E reports < 2.7 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D_s⁺ π⁻ K⁺(892)⁰)/Γ_{total}] × [B(B_s⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

$$ \Gamma(D_0^0 K^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{145}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \text{ (units } 10^{-5}) $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

### 5.5 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 5.6 \pm 0.5 \pm 0.2 $$

$$ \text{KUMAR} \quad 23 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

$$ 5.3 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.3 $$

$$ \text{1 AUBERT, B} \quad 06L \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 5.0^{+1.3}_{-1.2} \pm 0.6 $$

$$ \text{1 KROKOVNY} \quad 03 \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by KUMAR 23} $$

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_0^0 K^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{146}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \text{ (units } 10^{-6}) $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 88 \pm 15 \pm 9 $$

$$ \text{1 AUBERT} \quad 06A \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_0^0 K^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma(D_0^0 \pi^+ \pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{146}/\Gamma_{47} $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \text{ (units } 10^{-5}) $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 0.106 \pm 0.007 \pm 0.008 $$

$$ \text{AAIJ} \quad 13AQ \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ \Gamma(D_0^0 K^*(892)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{147}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \text{ (units } 10^{-5}) $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

### 4.5 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 5.4 \pm 0.3 \pm 1.1 $$

$$ \text{1.2 AAIJ} \quad 15X \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ 4.0 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.3 $$

$$ \text{3 AUBERT, B} \quad 06L \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

$$ 4.8^{+1.1}_{-1.0} \pm 0.5 $$

$$ \text{3 KROKOVNY} \quad 03 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 5.7 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.6 $$

$$ \text{3 AUBERT} \quad 06A \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT, B 06L} $$

1 AAIJ 15x reports (5.13 ± 0.20 ± 0.15 ± 0.24 ± 0.60) × 10⁻⁵ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^*(892)⁰)/Γ_{total}] × [B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻)] assuming B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻) = (9.2 ± 0.6 ± 0.7 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁵, which we rescale to our best value B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻) = (8.8 ± 1.7) × 10⁻⁵. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Measured via amplitude analysis of B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻, which excludes contribution from decay via D*(2010)⁻ resonance.

3 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_0^0 K^*(1410)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{148}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \quad \text{CL \%} \quad 90 $$

$$ \text{1 AAIJ} \quad 15X \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Measured via amplitude analysis of B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻, which excludes contribution from decay via D*(2010)⁻ resonance.

$$ \Gamma(D_0^0 K_0^*(1430)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{149}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \text{ (units } 10^{-5}) $$

$$ \text{1.2 AAIJ} \quad 15X \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

1 AAIJ 15x reports (0.71 ± 0.27 ± 0.33 ± 0.47 ± 0.08) × 10⁻⁵ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D_0^0 K_0^*(1430)⁰)/Γ_{total}] × [B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻)] assuming B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻) = (9.2 ± 0.6 ± 0.7 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁵, which we rescale to our best value B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻) = (8.8 ± 1.7) × 10⁻⁵. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Measured via amplitude analysis of B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻, which excludes contribution from decay via D*(2010)⁻ resonance.

$$ \Gamma(D_0^0 K_2^*(1430)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{150}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \text{ (units } 10^{-5}) $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 2.1 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.4 $$

1 AAIJ 15x reports (2.04 ± 0.45 ± 0.30 ± 0.54 ± 0.25) × 10⁻⁵ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D_0^0 K_2^*(1430)⁰)/Γ_{total}] × [B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻)] assuming B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻) = (9.2 ± 0.6 ± 0.7 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁵, which we rescale to our best value B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻) = (8.8 ± 1.7) × 10⁻⁵. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Measured via amplitude analysis of B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻, which excludes contribution from decay via D*(2010)⁻ resonance.

$$ \Gamma(D_0^*(2300)^- K^+, D_0^*^- \to D_0^0 \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{151}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \text{ (units } 10^{-5}) $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 1,2 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 15X \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

1 AAIJ 15x reports (1.77 ± 0.26 ± 0.19 ± 0.67 ± 0.20) × 10⁻⁵ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D_0^*(2300)^- K^+, D_0^*^- → D_0^0 π^-)/Γ_{total}] × [B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻)] assuming B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻) = (9.2 ± 0.6 ± 0.7 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁵, which we rescale to our best value B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻) = (8.8 ± 1.7) × 10⁻⁵. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Measured via amplitude analysis of B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻, which excludes contribution from decay via D*(2010)⁻ resonance.

$$ \Gamma(D_2^*(2460)^- K^+, D_2^*^- \to D_0^0 \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{152}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \text{ (units } 10^{-6}) $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 20.3 \pm 3.5 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} $$

22 ± 2 ± 4
1,2 AAIJ 15X LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV
18.3 ± 4.0 ± 3.1
3 AUBERT 06A BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1 AAIJ 15x reports (2.12 ± 0.10 ± 0.11 ± 0.11 ± 0.25) × 10⁻⁵ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → D_2^*(2460)^- K^+, D_2^*^- → D_0^0 π^-)/Γ_{total}] × [B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻)] assuming B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻) = (9.2 ± 0.6 ± 0.7 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁵, which we rescale to our best value B(B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻) = (8.8 ± 1.7) × 10⁻⁵. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Measured via amplitude analysis of B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻, which excludes contribution from decay via D*(2010)⁻ resonance.

3 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_3^*(2760)^- K^+, D_3^*^- \to D_0^0 \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{153}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \quad \text{CL \%} \quad 90 $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad <0.10 \times 10^{-5} \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 15X \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

1 Measured via amplitude analysis of B⁰ → D_0^0 K^+π⁻, which excludes contribution from decay via D*(2010)⁻ resonance.

$$ \Gamma(D_0^0 K^+ \pi^- \text{ nonresonant}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{154}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \text{ (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL \%} \quad <37 $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 06A \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S) $$

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma([K^+ \pi^-]_D K^*(892)^0) / \Gamma(D_0^0 K^*(892)^0) \quad \Gamma_{155}/\Gamma_{147} $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \quad \text{CL \%} \quad 90 $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 0.92 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.02 \quad 19N \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 1.05^{+0.17}_{-0.15} \pm 0.04 \quad \text{AAIJ} \quad 14BN \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 16S} $$

$$ 1.36^{+0.37}_{-0.32} \pm 0.07 \quad \text{AAIJ} \quad 13L \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 14BN} $$

$$ \Gamma([\pi^+ \pi^-]_D K^*(892)^0) / \Gamma(D_0^0 K^*(892)^0) \quad \Gamma_{156}/\Gamma_{147} $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \quad \text{CL \%} \quad 90 $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 1.32 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.03 \quad 19N \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 1.21^{+0.28}_{-0.25} \pm 0.05 \quad \text{AAIJ} \quad 14BN \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 16S} $$

$$ \Gamma([\pi^+ K^-]_D K^*(892)^0) / \Gamma([\pi^+ \pi^- \pi^-]_D K^*(892)^0) \quad \Gamma_{157}/\Gamma_{158} $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \quad \text{CL \%} \quad 90 $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 0.080 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.002 \quad 19N \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ \Gamma([\pi^+ \pi^- \pi^+ \pi^-]_D K^*(892)^0) / \Gamma(D_0^0 K^*(892)^0) \quad \Gamma_{159}/\Gamma_{147} $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \quad \text{CL \%} \quad 90 $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 1.01 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.04 \quad 19N \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ \Gamma([\pi^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^-]_D K^*(892)^0) / \Gamma([\pi^+ \pi^- \pi^+ \pi^-]_D K^*(892)^0) \quad \Gamma_{160}/\Gamma_{161} $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \quad \text{CL \%} \quad 90 $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 0.073 \pm 0.018 \pm 0.002 \quad 19N \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ \Gamma(D_0^0 \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{162}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \text{ (units } 10^{-4}) \quad \text{CL \%} $$

$$ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} \quad 2.67 \pm 0.09 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} $$

2.70 ± 0.06 ± 0.10
2.69 ± 0.09 ± 0.13
2.25 ± 0.14 ± 0.35
2.74 ± 0.36 ± 0.55
BLOOMFIELD 22 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)
1 LEES 11M BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)
1 BLYTH 06 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)
1 COAN 02 CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 2.9 \pm 0.2 \pm 0.3 \quad \text{1 AUBERT} \quad 04B \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by LEES 11M} $$

$$ 3.1 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.5 \quad \text{1 ABE} \quad 02J \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by BLYTH 06} $$

$$ <1.2 \quad 90 \quad \text{2 NEMATI} \quad 98 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad \text{Repl. by COAN 02} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

2 NEMATI 98 assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S) and use the PDG 96 values for D⁰, D*⁰, η, η', and ω branching fractions.
$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{163}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>3.21 &plusmn; 0.21 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>3.21 &plusmn; 0.10 &plusmn; 0.21</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.19 &plusmn; 0.20 &plusmn; 0.45</td><td>2,3</td><td>KUZMIN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.9 &plusmn; 1.0 &plusmn; 0.4</td><td>2</td><td>SATPATHY</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by KUZMIN 07</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 3.9</td><td>90</td><td>4</td><td>NEMATI</td><td>98 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5.5</td><td>90</td><td>5</td><td>ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2 Repl. by NEMATI 98</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 6.0</td><td>90</td><td>6</td><td>BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;27.0</td><td>90</td><td>7</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>88k ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Measured using isobar formalism in the decay chain $B^0 \to \bar{D}^0 \rho(770)$, $\rho \to \pi^+\pi^-$ assuming $B(\rho(770) \to \pi^+\pi^-) = 1$. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.

2. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

3. Our second uncertainty combines systematics and model errors quoted in the paper.

4. NEMATI 98 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the PDG 96 values for $D^0$, $D^0$, $\eta$, $\eta'$, and $\omega$ branching fractions.

5. ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and the PDG 1992 $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+\pi^0)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and $B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$.

6. BORTOLETT 92 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$.

7. ALBRECHT 88k reports < 0.003 assuming $B^0\bar{D}^0:B^+B^-$ production ratio is 45:55. We rescale to 50%.

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 f_2)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{164}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>1.56 &plusmn; 0.21 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.68 &plusmn; 0.11 &plusmn; 0.21</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.20 &plusmn; 0.18 &plusmn; 0.38</td><td>2,3</td><td>KUZMIN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Result obtained using the isobar formalism. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper. Measured in the decay chain $B^0 \to \bar{D}^0 f_2(1270)$, $f_2 \to \pi^+\pi^-$.

2. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

3. Our second uncertainty combines systematics and model errors quoted in the paper.

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{165}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>2.56 &plusmn; 0.12 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>2.66 &plusmn; 0.12 &plusmn; 0.21</td><td>1</td><td>KUMAR</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.53 &plusmn; 0.09 &plusmn; 0.11</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>11M</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.77 &plusmn; 0.16 &plusmn; 0.21</td><td>1</td><td>BLYTH</td><td>06</td><td>BELL Repl. by KUMAR 23</td></tr><tr><td>2.5 &plusmn; 0.2 &plusmn; 0.3</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 11M</td></tr><tr><td>1.4 &plusmn; 0.5<sup>-0.4</sup> &plusmn; 0.3</td><td>1</td><td>ABE</td><td>02J</td><td>BELL Repl. by BLYTH 06</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.3</td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>NEMATI</td><td>98 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.8</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td>ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2 Repl. by NEMATI 98</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2. NEMATI 98 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the PDG 96 values for $D^0$, $D^0$, $\eta$, $\eta'$, and $\omega$ branching fractions.

3. ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and the PDG 1992 $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+\pi^0)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and $B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$.

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{166}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>1.38 &plusmn; 0.16 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.48 &plusmn; 0.13 &plusmn; 0.07</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>11M</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.14 &plusmn; 0.20<sup>+0.10</sup><sub>-0.13</sub></td><td>1</td><td>SCHUMANN</td><td>05</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.7 &plusmn; 0.4 &plusmn; 0.2</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 11M</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;9.4</td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>NEMATI</td><td>98 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;8.6</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td>ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2 Repl. by NEMATI 98</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2. NEMATI 98 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the PDG 96 values for $D^0$, $D^0$, $\eta$, $\eta'$, and $\omega$ branching fractions.

3. ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and the PDG 1992 $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+\pi^0)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and $B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$.

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \eta')/\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \eta)$

$\Gamma_{166}/\Gamma_{165}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.54 &plusmn; 0.07 &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>11M</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.7 &plusmn; 0.2 &plusmn; 0.1</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 11M</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \omega)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{167}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>2.54 &plusmn; 0.16 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>2.75 &plusmn; 0.72 &plusmn; 0.35</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.57 &plusmn; 0.11 &plusmn; 0.14</td><td>2</td><td>LEES</td><td>11M</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.37 &plusmn; 0.23 &plusmn; 0.28</td><td>2</td><td>BLYTH</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.0 &plusmn; 0.3 &plusmn; 0.4</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 11M</td></tr><tr><td>1.8 &plusmn; 0.5 &plusmn; 0.3</td><td>2</td><td>ABE</td><td>02J</td><td>BELL Repl. by BLYTH 06</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5.1</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td>NEMATI</td><td>98 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.3</td><td>90</td><td>4</td><td>ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2 Repl. by NEMATI 98</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Result obtained using the isobar model. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.

2. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

3. NEMATI 98 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the PDG 96 values for $D^0$, $D^0$, $\eta$, $\eta'$, and $\omega$ branching fractions.

4. ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and the PDG 1992 $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+\pi^0)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and $B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$.

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{168}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.7 &plusmn; 2.1 &plusmn; 1.0</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AZ</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;23</td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AY</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 23AZ</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;116</td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07A0</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. The last uncertainty includes the uncertainties of the branching fractions $B(D^0 \to \bar{D}^0 K^+K^-)$ and $B(\phi \to K^+K^-)$.

2. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{169}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;19</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06A</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AE</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 K^+\pi^-)$

$\Gamma_{169}/\Gamma_{164}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.060 &plusmn; 0.034 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.045 &plusmn; 0.056 &plusmn; 0.028</td><td>1,2</td><td>NEGISHI</td><td>12</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.050 &plusmn; 0.018</td><td>3</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AE</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.068 &plusmn; 0.042</td><td>3</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AE</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2. Uses $D^0 \to K^-\pi^+$ mode. Restricts $K^+\pi^-$ mass within ±50 MeV of the nominal $K^0$ mass. Corresponds to the upper limit, < 0.16 at 95% CL.

3. Reports a signal at the level of 2.5 standard deviations after combining results from $D^0 \to K^+\pi^-$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^0$, and $K^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^-$.

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 K^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{170}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.1</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06L</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.8</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>KROKOVNY</td><td>03</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 K^*(892)^0)/\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 K^*(892)^0)$

$\Gamma_{170}/\Gamma_{147}$

"OUR EVALUATION" is derived from $r_{B^0}(B^0 \to DK^0)$ data block listed in "CP violation parameters" section.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th></tr></thead></table>

6.6 +1.1 -1.2 OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{171}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.5 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>05Q</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.0 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>ARTUSO</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 (2007)^0 \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{172}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>2.2 &plusmn; 0.6 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>3.05 &plusmn; 0.14 &plusmn; 0.28</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>11M</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.39 &plusmn; 0.18 &plusmn; 0.26</td><td>1</td><td>BLYTH</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.20 &plusmn; 0.59<sup>-0.52</sup> &plusmn; 0.79</td><td>1</td><td>COAN</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.9 &plusmn; 0.4 &plusmn; 0.5</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 11M</td></tr><tr><td>2.7 &plusmn; 0.8 &plusmn; 0.5</td><td>1</td><td>ABE</td><td>02J</td><td>BELL Repl. by BLYTH 06</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.4</td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>NEMATI</td><td>98 CLE2 Repl. by COAN 02</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;9.7</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td>ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2 Repl. by NEMATI 98</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.9 &plusmn; 0.4 &plusmn; 0.5</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 11M</td></tr><tr><td>2.7 &plusmn; 0.8 &plusmn; 0.5</td><td>1</td><td>ABE</td><td>02J</td><td>BELL Repl. by BLYTH 06</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.4</td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>NEMATI</td><td>98 CLE2 Repl. by COAN 02</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;9.7</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td>ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2 Repl. by NEMATI 98</td></tr></tbody></table>
¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²NEMATI 98 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the PDG 96 values for $D^0$, $D^0$, $\eta$, $\eta'$, and $\omega$ branching fractions.

³ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0)$ and absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) $ and the PDG 1992 $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) / B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) / B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-) / B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) $.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
2.2±0.6 (Error scaled by 2.6)

<figure><img src="image_598.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \text{ (units } 10^{-4}} $$

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \pi^0) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^0) $$

$$ \Gamma_{162} / \Gamma_{172} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

0.90±0.08 OUR AVERAGE

0.88±0.05±0.06

1.62±0.23±0.35

LEES

11M

BABR

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.0 ±0.1 ±0.2

AUBERT

04B

BABR Repl. by LEES 11M

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \rho^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{173} / \Gamma $$

$$ <5.1 \times 10^{-4} \quad \text{CL}\% $$

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1 SATPATHY

03

BELL

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

<0.00056

<0.00117

2 NEMATI

98

CLE2

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²NEMATI 98 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the PDG 96 values for $D^0$, $D^0$, $\eta$, $\eta'$, and $\omega$ branching fractions.

³ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0)$ and absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) $ and the PDG 1992 $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) / B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) / B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-) / B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) $.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \eta) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{174} / \Gamma $$

$$ <2.3 \pm 0.6 \quad \text{OUR AVERAGE} $$

Error includes scale factor of 2.8.

2.69±0.14±0.23

1.40±0.28±0.26

1 LEES

11M

BABR

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

2.6 ±0.4 ±0.4

<4.6

<2.6

<6.9

1 AUBERT

04B

BABR Repl. by LEES 11M

1 ABE

02J

BELL

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²NEMATI 98 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the PDG 96 values for $D^0$, $D^0$, $\eta$, $\eta'$, and $\omega$ branching fractions.

³ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0)$ and absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) $ and the PDG 1992 $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) / B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) / B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-) / B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) $.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \eta) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \eta) $$

$$ \Gamma_{165} / \Gamma_{174} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

0.99±0.10 OUR AVERAGE

0.97±0.07±0.07

1.27±0.29±0.25

LEES

11M

BABR

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.9 ±0.2 ±0.1

AUBERT

04B

BABR Repl. by LEES 11M

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \eta') / \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \eta') $$

$$ \Gamma_{175} / \Gamma_{174} $$

0.61±0.14±0.02

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

LEES

11M

BABR

e⁺e⁻ → $\Upsilon(4S)$

0.5 ±0.3 ±0.1

AUBERT

04B

BABR Repl. by LEES 11M

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \eta') / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{175} / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units $10^{-4}$)

CL%

1.40±0.22 OUR AVERAGE

1.48±0.22±0.13

1.21±0.34±0.22

1 LEES 11M BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

1 SCHUMANN 05 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.3 ±0.7 ±0.2

<14 90

<19 90

<27 90

1,2 AUBERT 04B BABR Repl. by LEES 11M

BRANDENB... 98 CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

3 NEMATI 98 CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

4 ALAM 94 CLE2 Repl. by NEMATI 98

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Reports an upper limit < 2.6 × 10⁻⁴ at 90% CL.

³NEMATI 98 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the PDG 96 values for $D^0$, $D^0$, $\eta$, $\eta'$, and $\omega$ branching fractions.

⁴ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0)$ and absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) $ and the PDG 1992 $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) / B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) / B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-) / B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) $.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \eta') / \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \eta') $$

$$ \Gamma_{166} / \Gamma_{175} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

0.96±0.18±0.06

LEES

11M

$e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.3 ±0.8 ±0.2

AUBERT

04B

BABR Repl. by LEES 11M

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{176} / \Gamma $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

(6.2±1.2±1.8) × 10⁻⁴

1,2 SATPATHY 03 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²No assumption about the intermediate mechanism is made in the analysis.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+ \pi^-) $$

$$ \Gamma_{177} / \Gamma_{176} $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

8.36±0.43±0.61

AAIJ

22N

LHCB $p p$ at 13 TeV

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{178} / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units $10^{-5}$)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

3.6±1.2±0.3

1 AUBERT,B 06L BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<6.6 90

1 KROKOVNY 03 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^*(892)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{179} / \Gamma $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

<6.9 × 10⁻⁵

1 KROKOVNY 03 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \phi) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{180} / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units $10^{-6}$)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

2.2±0.5±0.3

1 AAIJ 23AZ LHCB $p p$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹The last uncertainty includes the uncertainties of the branching fraction $B(D^0 \to \bar{D}^0 K^+ K^-)$ and $B(\phi \to K^+ K^-)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^*(892)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{181} / \Gamma $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

<4.0 × 10⁻⁵

1 KROKOVNY 03 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{182} / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units $10^{-3}$)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

2.7 ±0.5 OUR AVERAGE

2.60±0.47±0.37

1 MAJUMDER 04 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

1 EDWARDS 02 CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

3.0 ±0.7 ±0.6

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) $$

$$ \Gamma_{182} / \Gamma_{67} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

0.17±0.04±0.02

1 EDWARDS 02 CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 + D^*(2007)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{183} / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units $10^{-4}$)

CL%

8.0 ±0.6 OUR AVERAGE

7.82±0.38±0.63

8.1 ±0.6 ±1.0

9.9 ±4.2 ±1.2

1 KRONENBIT... 12 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

1 AUBERT,B 06A BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

1 LIPEUS 00 CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

<3.3

1 LIPEUS 00 CLE2 Repl. by LIPEUS 00

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

8.1 ±0.8 ±1.1

8.3 ±1.6 ±1.2

6.2 ±4.0 ±1.0

1 MIYAKE 05 BELL Repl. by KRONENBIT-TER 12

1,2 AUBERT 02M BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 06B

3 ARTUSO 99 CLE2 Repl. by LIPEUS 00

<2.9

4 BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^+e^- \to Z$

5 ASNER 97 CLE2 Repl. by ARTUSO 99

<61 90

<22 90
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²AUBERT 02M also assumes the measured CP-odd fraction of the final states is 0.22 ± 0.18 ± 0.03.

³ARTUSO 99 uses $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^0\bar{B}^0)=(48 \pm 4)\%$.

⁴BARATE 98Q (ALEPH) observes 2 events with an expected background of 0.10 ± 0.03 which corresponds to a branching ratio of $(2.3^{+1.9}_{-1.2} \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$.

⁵ASNER 97 at CLEO observes 1 event with an expected background of 0.022 ± 0.011. This corresponds to a branching ratio of $(5.3^{+7.1}_{-3.7} \pm 1.0) \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0\omega)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{184}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 3.6 ±1.1 OUR AVERAGE

$4.55 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.39$

$1 \text{ LEES} \quad 11\text{M} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$2.29 \pm 0.39 \pm 0.40$

$1 \text{ BLYTH} \quad 06 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$4.2 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.9$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 04\text{B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by LEES 11M}$

$< 7.9$

$1 \text{ ABE} \quad 02\text{J} \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$< 7.4$

$2 \text{ NEMATI} \quad 98 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$<21$

$3 \text{ ALAM} \quad 94 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad \text{Repl. by NEMATI 98}$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²NEMATI 98 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the PDG 96 values for $D^0$, $D^0$, $\eta$, $\eta'$, and $\omega$ branching fractions.

³ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0)$ and absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) $ and the PDG 1992 $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+\pi^0)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) $ and $B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) $.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\omega)/\Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0\omega) \qquad \Gamma_{167}/\Gamma_{184} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 0.58 ±0.06 OUR AVERAGE

$0.56 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.04$

$1 \text{ LEES} \quad 11\text{M} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$1.04 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.17$

$1 \text{ BLYTH} \quad 06 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$0.7 \pm 0.1 \pm 0.1$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 04\text{B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by LEES 11M}$

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^+D^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{185}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 6.1 ±1.5 OUR AVERAGE

$5.7 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.7$

$1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \quad 06A \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$11.7 \pm 2.6^{+2.2}_{-2.5}$

$1,2 \text{ ABE} \quad 02Q \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$8.8 \pm 1.0 \pm 1.3$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{J} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT,B 06B}$

$14.8 \pm 3.8^{+2.8}_{-3.1}$

$1,3 \text{ ABE} \quad 02Q \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$< 6.3$

$1 \text{ LIPELES} \quad 00 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$<56$

$1 \text{ BARATE} \quad 98\text{Q} \quad \text{ALEP} \quad e^+e^- \to Z$

$<18$

$90 \quad 90 \quad \text{ASNER} \quad 97 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²The measurement is performed using fully reconstructed $D^*$ and $D^+$ decays.

³The measurement is performed using a partial reconstruction technique for the $D^*$ and fully reconstructed $D^+$ decays as a cross check.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2007)^0\bar{D}^*(2007)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{186}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$< 0.9$

$1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \quad 06A \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$<270$

$90 \quad \text{BARATE} \quad 98\text{Q} \quad \text{ALEP} \quad e^+e^- \to Z$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^-D^0K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{187}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$1.07 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.09$

$1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$1.7 \pm 0.3 \pm 0.3$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{X} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B}$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^-D^*(2007)^0K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{188}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$3.46 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.37$

$1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$4.6 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.7$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{X} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B}$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^0D^0K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{189}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$2.47 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.18$

$1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$3.1 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.4$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{X} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B}$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^0D^0K^+)/\Gamma(D^-D^0K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{189}/\Gamma_{187} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$1.754 \pm 0.028 \pm 0.038$

$1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 20\text{AN} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad pp \text{ at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV}$

¹Uses $D^+ \to K^-\pi^+\pi^+$, $D^0 \to K^-\pi^+$ and $D^0 \to K^-\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^0D^*(2007)^0K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{190}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$10.6 \pm 0.33 \pm 0.86$

$1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$11.8 \pm 1.0 \pm 1.7$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{X} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B}$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^-D^+K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{191}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$0.75 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.12$

$1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$<1.7$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{X} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B}$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ [\Gamma(D^*(2010)^0D^+K^0) + \Gamma(D^-D^*(2010)^+K^0)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{192}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$6.41 \pm 0.36 \pm 0.39$

$1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$6.5 \pm 1.2 \pm 1.0$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{X} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B}$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^0D^*(2010)^+K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{193}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 8.1 ±0.7 OUR AVERAGE

$8.26 \pm 0.43 \pm 0.67$

$1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$6.8 \pm 0.8 \pm 1.4$

$1,2 \text{ DALSENO} \quad 07 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$8.8 \pm 0.8 \pm 1.4$

$1,2 \text{ AUBERT,B} \quad 06\text{Q} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$8.8^{+1.5}_{-1.4} \pm 1.3$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{X} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT,B 06Q}$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²The result is rescaled by a factor of 2 to convert from $K^0_S$ to $K^0$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*-D_{S1}(2536)^+, D_{S1}^+ \to D^{++}K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{194}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 8.0 ±2.4 OUR AVERAGE

$7.6^{+4.8}_{-4.2} \pm 1.6$

$1,2 \text{ DALSENO} \quad 07 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$8.2 \pm 2.6 \pm 1.2$

$1,2 \text{ AUBERT,B} \quad 06\text{Q} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$8.8^{+1.5}_{-1.4} \pm 1.3$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{X} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT,B 06Q}$

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0D^0K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{195}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$0.27 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.05$

$1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$<1.4$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{X} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B}$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^0\bar{D}^0K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(D^*(2010)^0D^0K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{196}/\Gamma_{189} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$14.2 \pm 1.1 \pm 1.0$

$1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 20\text{AG} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad pp \text{ at } 7, 8, \text{ and } 13 \text{ TeV}$

¹AAIJ 20AG excluded contributions from $B^0 \to D^*-D^0K^+$ transitions with $D^*^- \to D^0\pi^-$.

$$ [\Gamma(D^0D^*(2007)^0K^0) + \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0D^0K^0)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{197}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$1.08 \pm 0.32 \pm 0.36$

$1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$<3.7$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{X} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B}$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0D^*(2007)^0K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{198}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$2.40 \pm 0.55 \pm 0.67$

$1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

* * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * *

$<6.6$

$1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{X} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B}$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
Γ((D̄+D*)*(D+D*)K)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>199/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$3.68 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.24 \qquad 1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA...11B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$4.3 \pm 0.3 \pm 0.6 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03x \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B}$$

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(η<sub>c</sub> K⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>200/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$0.90 \pm 0.11 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \qquad 1 \text{ CHILIKIN} \quad 19 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)$$

$$1.04 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.13 \qquad 1 \text{ CHILIKIN} \quad 19 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)$$

$$0.62 \pm 0.21 \pm 0.05 \qquad 2,3 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07\text{AV} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)$$

$$0.91 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.05 \qquad 2,4 \text{ AUBERT,B} \quad 04\text{B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)$$

$$1.23 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.40 \pm 0.41 \qquad 2 \text{ FANG} \quad 03 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)$$

$$1.09 \pm 0.55 \pm 0.33 \qquad 5 \text{ EDWARDS} \quad 01 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)$$

¹ CHILIKIN 19 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\eta_c(1S) \to p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-)] = (38.0 + 6.4 + 1.3) \times 10^{-7}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\eta_c(1S) \to p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-) = (3.7 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³ AUBERT 07AV reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\eta_c(1S) \to p\bar{p})] = (0.83 + 0.28 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\eta_c(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (1.33 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ AUBERT,B 04B reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\eta_c(1S) \to K\bar{K}\pi)] = (0.0648 \pm 0.0085 \pm 0.0071) \times 10^{-3}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\eta_c(1S) \to K\bar{K}\pi) = (7.1 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵ EDWARDS 01 assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at the T(4S). The correlated uncertainties (28.3)% from $B(J/\psi(1S) \to \gamma\eta_c)$ in those modes have been accounted for.

Γ(η<sub>c</sub> K⁰)/Γ(J/ψ(1S) K⁰) Γ<sub>200/Γ21</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$1.39 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.45 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \quad 04B \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)$$

¹ Uses BABAR measurement of $B(B^0 \to J/\psi K^0) = (8.5 \pm 0.5 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-4}$.

Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁺π⁻)/Γ(J/ψ(1S) K⁺π⁻) Γ<sub>201/Γ25</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$0.57 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.05 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 18\text{AN LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV}$$

¹ AAIJ 18AN reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^+\pi^-)] \times [B(\eta_c(1S) \to p\bar{p})] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] = 0.357 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.008$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\eta_c(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (1.33 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K*(1410)⁰)/Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁺π⁻) Γ<sub>204/Γ201</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$32 \pm 24 \pm 6 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 18\text{AN LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV}$$

¹ AAIJ 18AN reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K*(1410)⁰)/\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K^+\pi^-)] \times [B(K^*(1410) \to K\pi)] = 0.021 \pm 0.011 \pm 0.011$ which we divide by our best value $B(K^*(1410) \to K\pi) = (6.6 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁺π⁻(NR))/Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁺π⁻) Γ<sub>202/Γ201</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$10.3 \pm 1.4 \pm 1.2 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 18\text{AN LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV}$$

Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁰*(1430)⁰)/Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁺π⁻) Γ<sub>205/Γ201</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$27 \pm 5 \pm 3 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 18\text{AN LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV}$$

¹ AAIJ 18AN reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K⁰*(1430)⁰)/\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K^+\pi^-)] \times [B(K⁰*(1430) \to K\pi)] = 0.253 \pm 0.035 \pm 0.035$ which we divide by our best value $B(K⁰*(1430) \to K\pi) = (93 \pm 10) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K²*(1430)⁰)/Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁺π⁻) Γ<sub>206/Γ201</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$8.2 \pm 3.6 \pm 0.2 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 18\text{AN LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV}$$

¹ AAIJ 18AN reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K²*(1430)⁰)/\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K^+\pi^-)] \times [B(K²*(1430) \to K\pi)] = 0.041 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.015$ which we divide by our best value $B(K²*(1430) \to K\pi) = (49.9 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K*(1680)⁰)/Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁺π⁻) Γ<sub>207/Γ201</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$5.7 \pm 6.5 \pm 0.4 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 18\text{AN LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV}$$

¹ AAIJ 18AN reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K*(1680)⁰)/\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K^+\pi^-)] \times [B(K*(1680) \to K\pi)] = 0.022 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.015$ which we divide by our best value $B(K*(1680) \to K\pi) = (38.7 \pm 2.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁰*(1950)⁰)/Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁺π⁻) Γ<sub>208/Γ201</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$7 \pm 4 \pm 6 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 18\text{AN LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV}$$

¹ AAIJ 18AN reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K⁰*(1950)⁰)/\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K^+\pi^-)] \times [B(K⁰*(1950) \to K^-\pi^+)] = 0.038 \pm 0.018 \pm 0.014$ which we divide by our best value $B(K⁰*(1950) \to K^-\pi^+) = (52 \pm 14) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

Γ(T<sub>cε</sub>(4100)⁻K⁺, T<sub>cε</sub>⁻→η<sub>c</sub>π⁻)/Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(1S) K⁺π⁻) Γ<sub>203/Γ201</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$3.3 \pm 1.1 \pm 1.2 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 18\text{AN LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV}$$

Γ(η<sub>c</sub> K*(892)⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>209/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

5.3 $\pm 0.8 \pm 0.9$ OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.7. See the ideogram below.

$$4.42 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.54 \pm 0.66 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 18\text{AN LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV} \\ 6.8 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.4 \qquad 2,3 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 08\text{AB BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S) \\ 7.7 \pm 2.4 \pm 0.7 \qquad 4,5 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07\text{AV BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S) \\ 16.2 \pm 3.2 \pm 5.5 \pm 6.0 \qquad 5 \text{ FANG} \quad 03 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)$$

¹ AAIJ 18AN reports $B(B^0 \to \eta_c K*(892)⁰, K*(892)⁰ \to K^+\pi^-) = (2.95 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.36 \pm 0.44) \times 10^{-4}$ using the fitted fraction of $0.514 \pm 0.019 \pm 0.017$ from Dalitz decay of $B(B^0 \to \eta_c K^+\pi^-) = (5.73 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.67) \times 10^{-4}$ and corrected for $B(K*(892)⁰ \to K^+\pi^-) = 2/3$.

² AUBERT 08AB reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c K*(892)⁰)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to \eta_c K^+)] = 0.62 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.05$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^+ \to \eta_c K^+) = (1.10 \pm 0.07) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ Uses the production ratio of $(B^+ B^-)/(B^0 B^0) = 1.026 \pm 0.032$ at T(4S).

⁴ AUBERT 07AV reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \eta_c K*(892)⁰)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\eta_c(1S) \to p\bar{p})] = (1.03 \pm 0.27 \pm 0.17) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\eta_c(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (1.33 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

WEIGHTED AVERAGE 5.3+0.8-0.9 (Error scaled by 1.7)

<figure><img src="image_599.png" /></figure>

Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(2S) K⁰, η<sub>c</sub> → p p̄ π⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>210/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$4.2 \pm 1.4 \pm 0.3 \pm 1.2 \pm 0.4 \qquad 1 \text{ CHILIKIN} \quad 19 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)$$

Γ(η<sub>c</sub>(2S) K⁰*)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>211/Γ</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$<3.9 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 08\text{AB BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)$$

¹ Uses the production ratio of $(B^+ B^-)/(B^0 B^0) = 1.026 \pm 0.032$ at T(4S).
<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(h<sub>c</sub>(1P)K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CHILIKIN</td><td>19</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(B<sup>0</sup> → h<sub>c</sub>(1P)K<sup>*</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub> × Γ(h<sub>c</sub>(1P) → γη<sub>c</sub>(1S))/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AB BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses the production ratio of $(B^+ - B^-)/(B^0 - B^0) = 1.026 \pm 0.032$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(η<sub>c</sub> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)/Γ(η<sub>c</sub> K<sup>0</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.33 ± 0.36<sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.33</sub></td><td>FANG</td><td>03</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψ(1S)K<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8.91 ± 0.21 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8.91 ± 0.21 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

### 8.91 ± 0.21 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>9.02 ± 0.10 ± 0.26</td><td>1 CHOUDHURY</td><td>21</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>8.1 ± 0.9 ± 0.6</td><td>2 CHILIKIN</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>8.8<sup>+1.4</sup><sub>-1.3</sub> ± 0.1</td><td>3,4 AUBERT</td><td>07AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>8.69 ± 0.22 ± 0.30</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>05J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>9.5 ± 0.8 ± 0.6</td><td>4 AVERY</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>11.5 ± 2.3 ± 1.7</td><td>5 ABE</td><td>96H CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6.93 ± 4.07 ± 0.04</td><td>6 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>9.24 ± 7.21 ± 0.05</td><td>7 ALBRECHT</td><td>90J ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;50</td><td>2</td><td>90</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>7.9 ± 0.4 ± 0.9</td><td>4 ABE</td><td>03B BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHOUDHURY 21</td></tr><tr><td>8.3 ± 0.4 ± 0.5</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>02 BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05J</td></tr><tr><td>8.5<sup>+1.4</sup><sub>-1.2</sub> ± 0.6</td><td>4 JESSOP</td><td>97 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by AVERY 00</td></tr><tr><td>7.5 ± 2.4 ± 0.8</td><td>6 ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>Sup. by JESSOP 97</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.3</td><td>10</td><td>90</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>ALAM</td><td>86 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹CHOUDHURY 21 uses the relative production fraction of charged (f<sup>+</sup>) to neutral (f<sup>00</sup>) B mesons at $\Upsilon(4S)$ value of $f^{+}/f^{00} = 1.058 \pm 0.024$.

²CHILIKIN 19 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^0)/\Gamma_{total}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-)] = (48.6^+4.6_-2.4) \times 10^{-7}$ which we divide by our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-) = (6.0 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³AUBERT 07AV reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^0)/\Gamma_{total}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] = (1.87^+0.28_-0.26) \pm 0.07 \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁵ABE 96H assumes that $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.02 \pm 0.14) \times 10^{-3}$.

⁶BORTOLETT092 reports $(6 \pm 3 \pm 2) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^0)/\Gamma_{total}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)]$ assuming $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = 0.069 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.971 \pm 0.032) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁷ALBRECHT 90J reports $(8 \pm 6 \pm 2) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^0)/\Gamma_{total}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)]$ assuming $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = 0.069 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.971 \pm 0.032) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψ(1S)K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.15 ± 0.05 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

### 1.15 ± 0.05 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.15 ± 0.01 ± 0.05</td><td>CHILIKIN</td><td>14</td><td>BELL B<sup>0</sup> → J/ψK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.16 ± 0.56 ± 0.01</td><td>1 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.079 ± 0.011</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09AA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.3</td><td>90</td><td>3 ALBRECHT</td><td>87D ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.3</td><td>90</td><td>GILES</td><td>84 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BORTOLETT092 reports $(1.0 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{total}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)]$ assuming $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = 0.069 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.971 \pm 0.032) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Does not report systematic uncertainties.

³ALBRECHT 87D assumes $B^+ - B^- / B^0 - B^0$ ratio is 55/45. $K\pi$ system is specifically selected as nonresonant.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψ(1S)K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.27 ± 0.05 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.28 ± 0.05 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.19 ± 0.01 ± 0.08</td><td>CHILIKIN</td><td>14</td><td>BELL B<sup>0</sup> → J/ψK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.33<sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.21</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>07AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.309 ± 0.026 ± 0.077</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.29 ± 0.05 ± 0.13</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>02N BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.74 ± 0.20 ± 0.18</td><td>3 ABE</td><td>98O CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.32 ± 0.17 ± 0.17</td><td>4 JESSOP</td><td>97 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.27 ± 0.65 ± 0.01</td><td>5 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.27 ± 0.60 ± 0.01</td><td>6 ALBRECHT</td><td>90J ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.04 ± 1.81 ± 0.02</td><td>5 BEBEK</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.24 ± 0.05 ± 0.09</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>02 BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05J</td></tr><tr><td>1.36 ± 0.27 ± 0.22</td><td>8 ABE</td><td>96H CDF</td><td>Sup. by ABE 980</td></tr><tr><td>1.69 ± 0.31 ± 0.18</td><td>9 ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>Sup. by JESSOP 97</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>10 ALBRECHT</td><td>94G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.0 ± 0.30</td><td>11 ALBAJAR</td><td>91E UA1</td><td>E<sup>0</sup>p̄<sup>0</sup>m̄ = 630 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.3 ± 0.18</td><td>5 12 ALBRECHT</td><td>87D ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.1 ± 0.18</td><td>5 13 ALAM</td><td>86 CLEO</td><td>Repl. by BEBEK 87</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT 07AV reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)<sup>0</sup>)/\Gamma_{total}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] = (2.82^{+0.30}_{-0.35}) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³ABE 98O reports $[B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)<sup>0</sup>)]/[B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+)] = 1.76 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.15$. We multiply by our best value $B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+) = (9.9 \pm 1.0) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁵BORTOLETT092 reports $(1.1 \pm 0.5 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)<sup>0</sup>)/\Gamma_{total}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)]$ assuming $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = 0.069 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.971 \pm 0.032) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁶ALBRECHT 90J reports $(1.1 \pm 0.5 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)<sup>0</sup>)/\Gamma_{total}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)]$ assuming $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = 0.069 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.971 \pm 0.032) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁷BEBEK 87 reports $(3.5 \pm 1.6 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)<sup>0</sup>)/\Gamma_{total}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)]$ assuming $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = 0.069 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.971 \pm 0.032) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Updated in BORTOLETT092 to use the same assumptions.

⁸ABE 96H assumes that $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.02 \pm 0.14) \times 10^{-3}$.

⁹The neutral and charged B events together are predominantly longitudinally polarized, $\Gamma_L/\Gamma = 0.080 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.05$. This can be compared with a prediction using HQET, 0.73 (KRAMER 92). This polarization indicates that the $B \to \psi K^*$ decay is dominated by the CP = -1 CP eigenstate. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

¹⁰ALBRECHT 94G measures the polarization in the vector-vector decay to be predominantly longitudinal, $\Gamma_T/\Gamma = 0.03 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.15$ making the neutral decay a CP eigenstate when the $K^*$ decays through $K^0\pi^0$.

¹¹ALBAJAR 91E assumes $B^0_d$ production fraction of 36%.

¹²ALBRECHT 87D assume $B^+ - B^- / B^0 - B^0$ ratio is 55/45. Superseded by ALBRECHT 90J.

¹³ALAM 86 assumes $B^\pm / B^0$ ratio is 60/40. The observation of the decay $B^+ \to J/\psi K^*(892)^+$ (HAAS 85) has been retracted in this paper.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψ(1S)K<sup>+</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)/Γ(J/ψ(1S)K<sup>0</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.50 ± 0.09 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.51 ± 0.05 ± 0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>05J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.39 ± 0.36 ± 0.10</td><td>ABE</td><td>96Q CDF</td><td>p̄p̄</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.49 ± 0.10 ± 0.08</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>02 BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05J</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψ(1S)ηK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.4 ± 0.9 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.22 ± 0.78 ± 0.49</td><td>1 IWASHITA</td><td>14 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>8.4 ± 2.6 ± 2.7</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04Y BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(J/ψ(1S)ηK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.5</td><td>1 XIE</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\omega K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{220}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ 2.3 \pm 0.3 \pm 0.3 \qquad 1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..10B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 3.1 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.3 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 0\text{B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10B} $$

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3915), \chi_{c0} \to J/\psi\omega)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{221}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ 2.1 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.3 \qquad 1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..10B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 1.3^{+1.3}_{-1.1} \pm 0.2 \qquad 1,2 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 0\text{B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10B} $$

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

² Corresponds to upper limit of 3.9 × 10⁻⁵ at 90% CL.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{219}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

4.9 ±1.0 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3.

$$ 4.43 \pm 0.76 \pm 0.19 $$

$$ 15 \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 10.2 \pm 3.8 \pm 1.0 $$

$$ 030 \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 8.8^{+3.5}_{-3.0} \pm 1.3 $$

$$ 00 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

² ANASTASSOV 00 finds 10 events on a background of 0.5 ± 0.2. Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at the T(45), a uniform Dalitz plot distribution, isotropic J/ψ(1S) and φ decays, and B(B⁺ → J/ψ(1S)φK⁺) = B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)φK⁰).

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K(1270)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{222}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ 1.30 \pm 0.34 \pm 0.32 $$

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45) and uses the PDG value of B(B⁺ → J/ψ(1S)K⁺) = (1.00 ± 0.10) × 10⁻³.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{223}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.66 ±0.10 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 1.62 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.06 $$

$$ 1 \text{ PAL} \quad 18 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 1.69 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.07 $$

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 08\text{AU} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 2.5^{+1.1}_{-0.9} \pm 0.2 $$

$$ 1 \text{ AVERY} \quad 00 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 1.94 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.17 $$

$$ 1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \quad 06\text{B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 08AU} $$

$$ 2.3 \pm 0.5 \pm 0.2 $$

$$ 1 \text{ ABE} \quad 03\text{B} \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by PAL 18} $$

$$ 2.0 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.2 $$

$$ 2 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 02 \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT,B 06B} $$

$$ < 32 \quad 90 $$

$$ 2 \text{ ACCIARRI} \quad 97\text{C} \quad \text{L3} $$

$$ < 5.8 \quad 90 $$

$$ 96 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad \text{Sup. by AVERY 00} $$

$$ <690 \quad 90 $$

$$ 95 \quad \text{ALEXANDER} \quad \text{Sup. by BISHAI 96} $$

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

² ACCIARRI 97c assumes B⁰ production fraction (39.5 ± 4.0)% and B₅ (12.0 ± 3.0)%.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{224}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

10.8 ±2.3 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.5.

$$ 7.3 \pm 2.5 \pm 1.3 $$

$$ 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 15\text{D} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} $$

$$ 12.3^{+1.9}_{-0.9} \pm 0.7 $$

$$ 2,3 \text{ CHANG} \quad 12 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 9.5 \pm 1.7 \pm 0.8 $$

$$ 3 \text{ CHANG} \quad 07\text{A} \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by CHANG 12} $$

$$ < 27 \quad 90 $$

$$ 3 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <1200 \quad 90 $$

$$ 4 \text{ ACCIARRI} \quad 97\text{C} \quad \text{L3} $$

¹ AAIJ 15d reports [Γ(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)η)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)η)] = (1.85 ± 0.61 ± 0.14) × 10⁻² which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)η) = (4.0 ± 0.7) × 10⁻⁴. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Reconstructs η in γγ and π⁺π⁻ π⁰ decays.

³ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

⁴ ACCIARRI 97c assumes B⁰ production fraction (39.5 ± 4.0%) and B₅ (12.0 ± 3.0%).

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{225}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

3.99 ±0.15 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 3.98 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.07 $$

$$ 1,2 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 13\text{M} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7 TeV} $$

$$ 4.6 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.6 $$

$$ 3 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ AAIJ 13M reports (3.97 ± 0.09 ± 0.11 ± 0.16) × 10⁻⁵ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁺ → J/ψ(1S)K⁺)] assuming B(B⁺ → J/ψ(1S)K⁺) = (1.018 ± 0.042) × 10⁻³, which we rescale to our best value B(B⁺ → J/ψ(1S)K⁺) = (1.020 ± 0.019) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² AAIJ 13M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/ψππ final state.

³ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^- \text{ nonresonant})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{226}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<1.2 90 1 AUBERT 07AC BABR e⁺ e⁻ → T(45)<br>¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi(500), f_0 \to \pi\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{227}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ 8.8 \pm 0.5 \pm \frac{1.1}{1.5} \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 14\text{X} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 6.4^{+2.5}_{-1.1} \pm 0.2 \qquad 2,3 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 13\text{M} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 14X} $$

¹ AAIJ 14X uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → J/ψπ⁺π⁻.

² AAIJ 13M reports (6.4 ± 0.8<sup>+2.4</sup><sub>-0.8</sub>) × 10⁻⁶ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)φ<sub>0</sub>)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻)] assuming B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻) = (3.97 ± 0.09 ± 0.11 ± 0.16) × 10⁻⁵, which we rescale to our best value B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻) = (3.99 ± 0.15) × 10⁻⁵. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ AAIJ 13M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/ψππ final state. Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B⁰ → J/ψπ⁺π⁻.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi_0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{228}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.33<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.06</sub> OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.5.

$$ 0.30 \pm 0.03 \pm \frac{0.02}{-0.03} \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 14\text{X} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} $$

$$ 0.42 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.02 \qquad 2,3 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 13\text{M} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7 TeV} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <0.5 \quad 90 \quad 4,5 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07\text{AC} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ AAIJ 14X uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → J/ψπ⁺π⁻.

² AAIJ 13M reports [Γ(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)φ<sub>0</sub>)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(f<sub>2</sub>(1270) → ππ)] = (3.5 ± 0.4 ± 0.4) × 10⁻⁶ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)φ<sub>0</sub>)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(f<sub>2</sub>(1270) → ππ)] / [B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻)] assuming B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻) = (3.97 ± 0.09 ± 0.16) × 10⁻⁵, which we rescale to our best value B(f<sub>2</sub>(1270) → ππ) = (84.3<sup>+2.8</sup><sub>-1.0</sub>) × 10⁻², B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻) = (3.99 ± 0.15) × 10⁻⁵. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

³ AAIJ 13M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/ψππ final state. Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B⁰ → J/ψπ⁺π⁻.

⁴ AUBERT 07AC reports [Γ(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)φ<sub>0</sub>)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(f<sub>2</sub>(1270) → ππ)] < 0.46 × 10⁻⁵ which we use for our best value B(f<sub>2</sub>(1270) → ππ) = 84.3 × 10⁻².

⁵ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{229}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.55<sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.16</sub> OUR AVERAGE

$$ 2.50 \pm 0.10 \pm \frac{0.18}{-0.15} \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 14\text{X} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} $$

$$ 2.7 \pm 0.3 \pm 0.2 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07\text{AC} \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 2.51^{+0.22}_{-0.23} \pm 0.10 \qquad 3,4 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 13\text{M} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 14X} $$

$$ 1.6 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.4 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03\text{B} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 07AC} $$

$$ <25 \quad 90 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ AAIJ 14X uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → J/ψπ⁺π⁻. We assume B(ρ(770)⁰ → π⁺π⁻) = 100%.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

³ AAIJ 13M reports (2.49<sup>+0.20</sup><sub>-0.13</sub>) × 10⁻⁵ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)ρ<sub>0</sub>)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻)] assuming B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻) = (3.97 ± 0.09 ± 0.11 ± 0.16) × 10⁻⁵, which we rescale to our best value B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻) = (3.99 ± 0.15) × 10⁻⁵. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ AAIJ 13M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/ψππ final state. Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B⁰ → J/ψπ⁺π⁻. Assumes B(ρ(770)⁰ → ππ) = 100%.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi(980), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{230}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ <1.1 \times 10^{-6} \quad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 13\text{M} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7 TeV} $$

¹ AAIJ 13M does not provide correlations between various measurements of the J/ψπ⁺π⁻ final state. The measurements were obtained from a Dalitz plot like analysis of B⁰ → J/ψπ⁺π⁻. Also reports Γ(J/ψ(1S)φ<sub>0</sub>), f₀ → π⁺π⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> = (6.1<sup>+3.1</sup><sub>-2.0</sub> × 1.7) × 10⁻⁶.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\rho(1450)^0, \rho^0 \to \pi\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{231}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.9<sup>+1.6</sup><sub>-0.7</sub> OUR AVERAGE

$$ 4.6 \pm 1.1 \pm 1.9 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 14\text{X} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} $$

$$ 2.1^{+2.4}_{-0.7} \pm 0.1 \qquad 2,3 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 13\text{M} \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7 TeV} $$
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

¹AAIJ 14x uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$.

²AAIJ 13M reports $(2.1^{+1.0+2.2}_{-0.6-0.4}) \times 10^{-6}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\rho(1450)^0), \rho^0 \to \pi\pi]/[B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-)]$ assuming $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = (3.97 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.16) \times 10^{-5}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = (3.99 \pm 0.15) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³AAIJ 13M does not report correlations between various measurements of the $J/\psi\pi\pi$ final state. Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of $B^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi\rho(1700)^0, \rho^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{232}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 2.0 \pm 0.5 \pm 1.2 \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 14\chi \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹AAIJ 14x uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\omega)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{233}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \qquad \text{CL\%} \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 1.8^{+0.7}_{-0.5} \pm 0.1 \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 14\chi \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <27 \qquad 90 \qquad \text{BISHAI} \qquad 96 \qquad \text{CLE2} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

¹AAIJ 14x reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\omega)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-)] = (2.7^{+0.8}_{-0.5}) \times 10^{-7}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-) = (1.53 \pm 0.12) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\omega)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\rho^0) \quad \Gamma_{233}/\Gamma_{229} $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 0.61^{+0.39}_{-0.21} \pm 0.05 \qquad 1.2 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 13M \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV} $$

¹AAIJ 13M reports $0.61^{+0.24}_{-0.14} + 0.31^{+0.06}_{-0.16}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\omega)/\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\rho^0)] \times [B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-)]$ assuming $B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-) = (1.53 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-) = (1.53 \pm 0.12) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²AAIJ 13M does not report correlations between various measurements of the $J/\psi\pi\pi$ final state. Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of $B^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$. Assumes $B(\rho(770)^0 \to \pi\pi) = 100\%$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\omega)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\rho^0) \quad \Gamma_{233}/\Gamma_{229} $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 0.89^{+0.19}_{-0.07} \pm 0.07 \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 13A \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{234}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 2.53^{+0.35}_{-0.05} \pm 0.05 \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 13BT \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV} $$

¹AAIJ 13BT reports $(2.53 \pm 0.31 \pm 0.19) \times 10^{-6}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}]/[B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+)]$ assuming $B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+) = (1.018 \pm 0.042) \times 10^{-3}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+) = (1.020 \pm 0.019) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)a_0(980), a_0 \to K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{235}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 0.470^{+0.33}_{-0.07} \pm 0.02 \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 13BT \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV} $$

¹AAIJ 13BT uses $B(B^0 \to J/\psi K^+K^-) = (2.53 \pm 0.31 \pm 0.19) \times 10^{-6}$ to derive this result. It also reports the equivalent upper limit of $< 9.0 \times 10^{-7}$ at 90% CL.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{236}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \qquad \text{CL\%} \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <1.1 \times 10^{-7} \qquad 90 \qquad \text{AAIJ} \qquad 21\chi \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <10.1 \times 10^{-7} \qquad 90 \qquad \text{LEES} \qquad 15 \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ <1.9 \times 10^{-7} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 13BT \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ <9.4 \times 10^{-7} \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{LIU} \qquad 08\chi \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ <9.2 \times 10^{-6} \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{AUBERT} \qquad 03\chi \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

¹AAIJ 13BT uses $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^+K^-) = (2.53 \pm 0.31 \pm 0.19) \times 10^{-6}$ and $B(\phi \to K^+K^-) = (48.9 \pm 0.5)\%$ to obtain this result.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Gamma(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta'(958))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{237}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \qquad \text{CL\%} \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 7.6^{+2.2}_{-1.0} \pm 1.0 \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 15D \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <7.4 \qquad 90 \qquad 2,3 \qquad \text{CHANG} \qquad 12 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ <63 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \qquad \text{AUBERT} \qquad 03\chi \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

¹AAIJ 15D reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\eta'(958))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}]/[B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\eta')] = (2.28 \pm 0.65 \pm 0.16) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\eta') = (3.3 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Reconstructs $\eta'(985)$ in $(\text{etapi} + \text{pi})^-$ and $\rho(770)$ decays.

³Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Gamma(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta')(958) \quad \Gamma_{224}/\Gamma_{237} $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 1.111^{+0.475}_{-0.062} \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 15D \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹Uses $J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-$, $\eta' \to \rho^0\gamma$, and $\eta' \to \eta\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^0\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^0) \quad \Gamma_{238}/\Gamma_{214} $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 0.50^{+0.04}_{-0.03} \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \qquad \text{AAIJ} \qquad 14L \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ 0.493^{+0.034}_{-0.027} \qquad \text{LEES} \qquad 15 \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ 1.24^{+0.40}_{-0.15} \qquad \text{AFFOLDER} \qquad 02B \qquad \text{CDF} \qquad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^0K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{240}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

²⁵ ±⁷ OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.8.

$$ 34.9 \pm 6.7 \pm 1.5 \qquad \text{LEES} \qquad 15 \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ 20.2 \pm 4.3 \pm 1.9 \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 14L \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV} $$

¹Measured with $B(B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0 K^+K^-) / B(B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0)$ using PDG 12 for the involved branching fractions.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^0K^-\pi^+ + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{239}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <21 \times 10^{-6} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 14L \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV} $$

¹Measured with $B(B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0 K^+\pi^-) / B(B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-)$ using PDG 12 values for the involved branching fractions.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^0\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{242}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 5.4^{+2.9}_{-0.9} \qquad \text{1 AFFOLDER} \qquad 02B \qquad \text{CDF} \qquad \text{pp at } 1.8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹Uses $B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K_S^0$ decay as a reference and $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^0) = 8.3 \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{243}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 7.7^{+4.1}_{-1.3} \qquad \text{1 AFFOLDER} \qquad 02B \qquad \text{CDF} \qquad \text{pp at } 1.8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹Uses $B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K_S^0$ decay as a reference and $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^0) = 8.3 \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{244}/\Gamma_{225} $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 0.361^{+0.017}_{-0.021} \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 14Y \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹Excludes contributions from $\psi(2S)$ and $\chi_{c1}(3872)$ decaying to $J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_1(1285))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{245}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 8.4^{+2.1}_{-2.0} \pm 0.5 \qquad 1 \text{AAIJ} \qquad 14Y \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹AAIJ 14Y reports $(8.37 \pm 1.95^{+0.71}_{-0.66} \pm 0.35) \times 10^{-6}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) f_1(1285))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(f_1(1285) \to 2\pi^+2\pi^-)]$ assuming $B(f_1(1285) \to 2\pi^+2\pi^-) = (1.01 \pm 0.007)$, which we rescale to our best value $B(f_1(1285) \to 2\pi^+2\pi^-) = (10.9 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{246}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 6.6^{+1.9}_{-1.1} \qquad \text{1 AFFOLDER} \qquad 02B \qquad \text{CDF} \qquad \text{pp at } 1.8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹Uses $B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^*(892)^0$ decay as a reference and $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^0) = 12.4 \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(\eta_{c2}(1D)K_S^0, \eta_{c2} \to h_c\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{247}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <3.5 \times 10^{-5} \qquad 90 \qquad \text{CHILIKIN} \qquad 20 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ \Gamma(\eta_{c2}(1D)\pi^-K^+, \eta_{c2} \to h_c\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{248}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <1.0 \times 10^{-4} \qquad 90 \qquad \text{CHILIKIN} \qquad 20 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{251}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

1.4 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

$$ 3.9^{+1.1}_{-0.9} \pm 1.4 \qquad 1 \text{HIRATA} \qquad 23 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ 1.14 \pm 0.33 \pm 0.30 \qquad 2 \text{CHOI} \qquad 11 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ 1.5 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.5 \qquad 3 \text{DEL-AMO-SA} \dots 10B \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ \text{••• We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. •••} $$

$$ <3.1 \qquad 90 \qquad 4,5 \qquad \text{BHARDWAJ} \qquad 11 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ <2.9 \qquad 90 \qquad 5,6 \qquad \text{AUSHEV} \qquad 10 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ <6 \qquad 90 \qquad 7,8 \qquad \text{AUBERT} \qquad 09B \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ <6.6 \qquad 90 \qquad 5,7,9 \qquad \text{AUBERT} \qquad 08B \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ <1.7 \qquad 90 \qquad 10 \qquad \text{AUBERT} \qquad 08\chi \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$

$$ <2.9 \qquad 90 \qquad 11 \qquad \text{AUBERT} \qquad 06 \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 08\chi} $$

$$ 3.7^{+1.7}_{-1.8} \pm 1.8 \qquad 12,13 \qquad \text{GOKHROO} \qquad 06 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \Gamma(4S) $$
1 HIRATA 23 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{D}^*0D^0)] = (1.30^{+0.36}_{-0.07}) \times 10^{-4}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{D}^*0D^0) = (34 \pm 12) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 CHOI 11 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{D}^*0D^0)] = (0.50 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.04)$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{D}^*0D^0) = (2.3 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3 DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10B reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{D}^*0D^0)] = (6 \pm 3 \pm 1) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{D}^*0D^0) = (4.1 \pm 1.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

4 BHARDWAJ 11 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi)] < 2.4 \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi) = 7.8 \times 10^{-3}$.

5 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

6 AUSHEV 10 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{D}^*0D^0)] = (0.97 \pm 0.46 \pm 0.13) \times 10^{-4}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{D}^*0D^0) = (34 \pm 12) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

7 Uses $B(\mathcal{T}(45) \to B^+\bar{B}^-) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\mathcal{T}(45) \to B^0\bar{B}^0) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

8 AUBERT 09B reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi)] < 4.9 \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi) = 7.8 \times 10^{-3}$.

9 AUBERT 08B reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{D}^*0D^0)] = (2.22 \pm 1.05 \pm 0.42) \times 10^{-4}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{D}^*0D^0) = (34 \pm 12) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

10 AUBERT 08Y reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi(15))] < 6.0 \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi(15)) = 3.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

11 AUBERT 06 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi(15))] < 10.3 \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi(15)) = 3.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

12 GOKHROO 06 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to D^0\bar{D}^0\pi^0)] = (1.66 \pm 0.70^{+0.32}_{-0.37}) \times 10^{-4}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to D^0\bar{D}^0\pi^0) = (45 \pm 21) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

13 Measure the near-threshold enhancements in the $(D^0\bar{D}^0\pi^0)$ system at a mass 3875.2 $\pm 0.7^{+0.3}_{-1.6}$ $\pm 0.8$ MeV/c².

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)^- K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE} \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \qquad \Gamma_{249}/\Gamma \\ <5 \times 10^{-4} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 06\text{E} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \end{array} $$

¹ Perform measurements of absolute branching fractions using a missing mass technique.

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)^- K^+, \chi_{c1}(3872)^- \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^-\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ <4.2 \qquad 90 \qquad 1,2 \text{ CHOI} \qquad 11 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <5.4 \qquad 90 \qquad 2,3 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 05\text{B} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ Assumes $\pi^+\pi^0$ originates from $\rho^+$.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

³ The isovector-X hypothesis is excluded with a likelihood test at $1 \times 10^{-4}$ level.

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)K^*(892^0))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ 1.1 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.3 \qquad 1 \text{ BALA} \qquad 15 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <4 \qquad 90 \qquad 2,3 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 09\text{B} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \\ 3,4 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 09\text{B} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ BALA 15 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^*(892^0))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi(15))] = (4.0 \pm 1.5 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi(15)) = (3.5 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² AUBERT 09B reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^*(892^0))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi)] < 2.8 \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi) = 7.8 \times 10^{-2}$.

³ Uses $B(\mathcal{T}(45) \to B^+\bar{B}^-) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\mathcal{T}(45) \to B^0\bar{B}^0) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

⁴ AUBERT 09B reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^*(892^0))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi(25))] < 4.4 \times 10^{-6}$ at 90% CL.

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ 2.2 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.6 \qquad 1,2 \text{ BALA} \qquad 15 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \end{array} $$

¹ BALA 15 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi(15))] = (7.9 \pm 1.3 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \bar{J}/\psi(15)) = (3.5 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE} \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.5 \times 10^{-5} \qquad 90 \qquad 1,2 \text{ CHOU} \qquad 19 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \end{array} $$

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

² CHOU 19 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi(1S))] < 5.1 \times 10^{-7}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi(1S)) = 3.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(T_{c\bar{c}1}(4430)^\pm K^-, T_{c\bar{c}1}^\pm \to \psi(2S)\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ 6.0^{+1.7}_{-2.0} \pm 2.5 \qquad 95 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 09\text{AA} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <3.1 \qquad 95 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 09\text{AA} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \\ 3.2^{+1.8}_{-0.9} \pm 5.3 \qquad 1 \qquad 1 \text{ MIZUK} \qquad 09 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \\ 4.1 \pm 1.0 \pm 1.4 \qquad 1,2 \text{ CHOI} \qquad 08 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad \text{Repl. by MIZUK 09} \end{array} $$

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

² Establishes the $(Z_{c4430}^+) +$ with a significance of 6.5 sigma. Needs confirmation.

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(T_{c\bar{c}1}(4430)^\pm K^-, T_{c\bar{c}1}^\pm \to J/\psi\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ 5.4^{+4.0}_{-1.0} \pm 1.1 \qquad 14 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad \bar{B}^0 \to J/\psi K^-\pi^+ \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <4 \qquad 95 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 09\text{AA} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(T_{c\bar{c}1}(3900)^\pm K^-, T_{c\bar{c}1}^\pm \to J/\psi\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE} \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ <9 \times 10^{-7} \qquad 14 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad \bar{B}^0 \to J/\psi K^-\pi^+ \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(T_{c\bar{c}1}(4200)^\pm K^-, T_{c\bar{c}1}^\pm \to J/\psi\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ 2.2^{+0.7}_{-0.5} \pm 1.1 \qquad 14 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad \bar{B}^0 \to J/\psi K^-\pi^+ \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(T_{c\bar{c}1}(3900)^\pm K^-, T_{c\bar{c}1}^\pm \to J/\psi\pi^+)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^*(892^0)) \\ \text{VALUE} \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.5 \times 10^{-2} \qquad 90 \qquad \text{ABAZOV} \qquad 18\text{B} \qquad D^0 \qquad p\bar{p} \text{ at } 1.96 \text{ TeV} \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-7}) \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ 4.51^{\pm 0.40}_{-0.44} \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \qquad 19\text{U} \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad p\bar{p} \text{ at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <5.2 \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{ AAIJ} \qquad 13\text{Z} \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 19U} \\ <8.3 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ XIE} \qquad 05 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \\ <19 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 03\text{k} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ Measured relative to $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ assuming $B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi) = (10.5 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.64) \times 10^{-4}$ and taking into account small $K^+K^-$ S-wave contribution. Measurement assumes $f_S/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$ for 7, 8 TeV data and $f_S/f_d$ multiplied by $1.068 \pm 0.046$ for 13 TeV data.

² Uses $B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = (1.98 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-4}$.

³ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.5 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \qquad 15\text{BB} \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad p\bar{p} \text{ at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV} \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <1.6 \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 04\text{T} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ Branching fractions of normalization modes $B^0 \to J/\psi\chi X$ taken from PDG 14. Uses $f_S/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(J/\psi\mu^+\mu^-, J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE} \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.0 \times 10^{-9} \qquad 95 \qquad \text{AAIJ} \qquad 22\text{Q} \qquad \text{LHCB} \qquad p\bar{p} \text{ at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV} \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\bar{D}^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.3 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 05\text{U} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <2.0 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ ZHANG} \qquad 05\text{B} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(\psi(2S)\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \qquad CL\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} \\ 1.17^{\pm 0.17}_{-0.08} \qquad 16 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad \bar{B}^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+ \qquad e^+e^- \to \mathcal{T}(45) \end{array} $$

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

### Γ(ψ(2S) K⁰)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

### 5.8 ±0.5 OUR FIT

### 5.8 ±0.5 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>4.7 ±0.7 ±0.7</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14L</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6.46 ±0.65 ±0.51</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05J</td><td>BABR</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>6.7 ±1.1</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.0 ±1.1 ±0.6</td><td>2 RICHIichi</td><td>01</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

Γ²⁶⁴/Γ

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>6.9 ±1.1 ±1.1</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>02</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05J</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 8</td><td>90</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;15</td><td>90</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;28</td><td>90</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ Measured with $B(B^0 \to \psi(2S) K_S^0) \times B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-) / B(B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0)$ using PDG 12 values for the involved branching fractions.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

### Γ(ψ(2S) K⁰π⁺π⁻)/Γ(ψ(2S) K⁰)

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

0.480 ±0.013 ±0.032

Γ²⁶⁵/Γ²⁶⁴

### Γ(ψ(2S) K⁰)/Γ(J/ψ(1S) K⁰)

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

0.82 ±0.13 ±0.12

DOCUMENT ID TUMASYAN 22AI CMS

TECN COMMENT pp at 13 TeV

DOCUMENT ID AUBERT 02 BABR

TECN COMMENT e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

### Γ(ψ(3770) K⁰, ψ → D⁰D⁰)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

<1.23 90

DOCUMENT ID 1 AUBERT 08B BABR

TECN COMMENT e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

### Γ(ψ(3770) K⁰, ψ → D⁰D⁰)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

<1.88 90

DOCUMENT ID 1 AUBERT 08B BABR

TECN COMMENT e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

### Γ(ψ(2S) K⁺π⁻)/Γ(J/ψ(1S) K⁺π⁻)

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

0.56 ±0.07 ±0.05

DOCUMENT ID 1 AAIJ 13AA LHCB

TECN COMMENT pp at 7 TeV

¹ Assuming lepton universality for dimuon decay modes of $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ mesons, the ratio $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-)/B(\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = B(J/\psi \to e^+e^-)/B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = 7.69 \pm 0.19$ was used.

### Γ(ψ(2S) K⁺π⁻)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

5.80 ±0.39

DOCUMENT ID 1,2 CHILIKIN 13 BELL

TECN COMMENT e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

5.57 ±0.16

3 AUBERT 09AA BABR

TECN COMMENT e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<10 90

2 ALBRECHT 90J ARG

TECN COMMENT e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹ Combines measurements with $\psi(2S) \to \ell^+\ell^-$ with measurement from MIZUK 09 which uses $\psi(2S) \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³ Does not report systematic uncertainties.

### Γ(ψ(2S) K*(892)⁰)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

### 5.9 ±0.4 OUR FIT

### 6.0 ±0.7 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID 1 AAIJ 12L LHCB

TECN COMMENT pp at 7 TeV

5.55 ±0.22 ±0.41

0.23 ±0.84

1 CHILIKIN 13 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1 AUBERT 05J BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1 RICHIichi 01 CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

2 ABE 980 CDF pD̄ 1.8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

5.52 ±0.35 ±0.53

0.32 ±0.58

1 MIZUK 09 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1 ALAM 94 CLE2 Repl. by RICHIichi 01

1 BORTOLETT092 CLEO e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1 ALBRECHT 90J ARG e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

14 ±8 ±4

<23 90

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

² ABE 980 reports $[B(B^0 \to \psi(2S) K^*(892)⁰)]/[B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+)]=0.908 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.10$. We multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^+)=(9.9 \pm 1.0) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

### Γ(ψ(2S) K*(892)⁰)/Γ(ψ(1S) K*(892)⁰)

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

0.487 ±0.018 ±0.014

DOCUMENT ID 1,2 AAIJ 12L LHCB

TECN COMMENT pp at 7 TeV

¹ AAIJ 12L reports $0.476 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.010 \pm 0.012$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \psi(2S) K^*(892)⁰)/\Gamma(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^*(892)⁰)] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)] /$

$[B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)]$ assuming $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.94 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = (7.72 \pm 0.17) \times 10^{-3}$, which we rescale to our best values $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.971 \pm 0.032) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = (7.94 \pm 0.22) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

² Assumes $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-) / B(\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = B(J/\psi \to e^+e^-) / B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = 7.69 \pm 0.19$.

### Γ(ψ(2S) K*(892)⁰)/Γ(ψ(2S) K⁰)

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

1.02 ±0.10 OUR FIT

1.00 ±0.14 ±0.09

DOCUMENT ID 1 AAIJ 12L LHCB

TECN COMMENT pp at 7, 8 TeV

### Γ(χc₀ K⁰)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

195 ± 42/36 ±11

DOCUMENT ID 1 AAIJ 18F LHCB

TECN COMMENT pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

145 ±103 ± 9

2,3 LEES 12I BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

148 ± 30 ±13

2,4 LEES 12O BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

142 ± 55/44 ±22

2,5 AUBERT 09AU BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<113 90

5 GARMASH 07 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<1240 90

2 AUBERT 05K BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<500 90

6 EDWARDS 01 CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹ AAIJ 18F uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-$ final state decays. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 18 average $B(B^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-) = (4.96 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-5}$ is used. We compute $B(B^0 \to \chi_{c0} K_S^0)$ using the PDG value $B(\chi_{c0} \to \pi\pi) = (8.51 \pm 0.33) \times 10^{-3}$ and 2/3 for the $\pi^+\pi^-$ fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³ LEES 12I reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c0} K_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \to K_S^0 K_S^0)] = (0.46 \pm 0.25 \pm 0.17) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \to K_S^0 K_S^0) = (3.17 \pm 0.19) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ Measured in the $B^0 \to K_S^0 K^+K^-$ decay.

⁵ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-$ final state decays.

⁶ EDWARDS 01 assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$. The correlated uncertainties (28.3)% from $B(J/\psi(1S) \to \gamma\eta_c)$ in those modes have been accounted for.

### Γ(χc₀ K*(892)⁰)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

1.7 ±0.3 ±0.2

DOCUMENT ID 1 AUBERT 08BD BABR

TECN COMMENT e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<7.7 90

1 AUBERT 05K BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08BD

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

### Γ(χc₁ π⁰)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

1.12 ±0.25 ±0.12

DOCUMENT ID 1 KUMAR 08 BELL

TECN COMMENT e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

### Γ(χc₁ K⁰)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

3.95 ±0.27 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID 1 CHILIKIN 19 BELL

TECN COMMENT e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

15 ±5/4 ±6

1 CHILIKIN 19 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

3.78 ±0.17 ±0.16

2 BHARDWAJ 11 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

4.2 ±0.3 ±0.3

3 AUBERT 09B BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

3.1 ±1.5/1.1 ±0.1

4 AVERY 00 CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<27 90

2 ALAM 94 CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

3.51 ±0.33 ±0.45

2 SONI 06 BELL Repl. by BHARDWAJ 11

4.53 ±0.41 ±0.51

2 AUBERT 05J BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09B

4.3 ±1.4 ±0.2

5 AUBERT 02 BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05J

<27 90

2 ALAM 94 CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹ CHILIKIN 19 reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1} K_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-)] = (7.4 \pm 2.4 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-7}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-) = (5.0 \pm 1.9) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³ Uses $\chi_{c1,2} \to J/\psi\gamma$. Assumes $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^+B^-) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^0B^0) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

⁴ AVERY 00 reports $(3.9 \pm 1.9 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1} K_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S))]$ assuming $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = 0.273 \pm 0.016$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (34.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵ AUBERT 02 reports $(5.4 \pm 1.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \chi_{c1} K_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S))]$ assuming $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = 0.273 \pm 0.016$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (34.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1} K^0) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^0) \qquad \Gamma_{274} / \Gamma_{214} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.53 ± 0.16 ± 0.02</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>02</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT 02 reports 0.66 ± 0.11 ± 0.17 from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → χc₁K⁰)/Γ(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)K⁰)] × [B(χc₁(1P) → γJ/ψ(1S))] assuming B(χc₁(1P) → γJ/ψ(1S)) = 0.273 ± 0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(χc₁(1P) → γJ/ψ(1S)) = (34.3 ± 1.3) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1} \pi^{-} K^{+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{275} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.97 ± 0.12 ± 0.28</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.83 ± 0.10 ± 0.39</td><td>1 MIZUK</td><td>08</td><td>BELL Repl. by BHARDWAJ 16</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1} \pi^{-} K^{+}) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^{+} \pi^{-}) \qquad \Gamma_{275} / \Gamma_{215} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.476 ± 0.021 ± 0.018</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12B</td><td>BABR</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹LEES 12B reports 0.474 ± 0.013 ± 0.026 from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → χc₁π⁻K⁺)/Γ(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S)K⁺π⁻)] × [B(χc₁(1P) → γJ/ψ(1S))] assuming B(χc₁(1P) → γJ/ψ(1S)) = (34.4 ± 1.5) × 10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(χc₁(1P) → γJ/ψ(1S)) = (34.3 ± 1.3) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1} K^{*}(892^{0}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}) \qquad \Gamma_{276} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.38 ± 0.19 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td></tr></tbody></table>

²**2.22<sup>+0.40</sup><sub>-0.31</sub> OUR AVERAGE** Error includes scale factor of 1.6.

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.5 ± 0.2 ± 0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.73<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.12</sub> ± 0.34</td><td>2 MIZUK</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.14 ± 0.34 ± 0.72</td><td>2 SONI</td><td>06</td><td>BELL Repl. by MIZUK 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.27 ± 0.42 ± 0.64</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09B</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.8 ± 1.3 ± 0.1</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>02</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05J</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;21</td><td>90</td><td>4 ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses χc₁,₂ → J/ψγ. Assumes B(Γ(4S) → B⁺B⁻) = (51.6 ± 0.6)% and B(Γ(4S) → B⁰B⁰) = (48.4 ± 0.6)%.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).
³AUBERT 02 reports (4.8 ± 1.4 ± 0.9) × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → χc₁K* (892⁰)) / Γ_{total}] × [B(χc₁(1P) → γJ/ψ(1S))] assuming B(χc₁(1P) → γJ/ψ(1S)) = 0.273 ± 0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(χc₁(1P) → γJ/ψ(1S)) = (34.3 ± 1.3) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

⁴BORTOLETTO 92 assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1} K^{*}(892^{0}) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^{*}(892^{0})) \qquad \Gamma_{276} / \Gamma_{216} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>18.8 ± 1.5 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>19.8 ± 1.1 ± 1.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AC</td><td>LHCB p p at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses B(χc₁ → J/ψγ) = (34.4 ± 1.5)%.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1} K^{*}(892^{0}) / \Gamma(\chi_{c1} K^{0})) \qquad \Gamma_{276} / \Gamma_{274} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.72 ± 0.11 ± 0.12</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>05J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.89 ± 0.34 ± 0.17</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>02</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05J</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\tau_{c\bar{c}}(4050)^- K^+, \tau_{c\bar{c}}^- \to \chi_{c1} \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{277} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.0 + 1.5 + 3.7<br>- 0.8 - 1.6</td><td>1 MIZUK</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.8</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12B</td><td>BABR</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Uses χc₁ → J/ψγ mode. Uses χc₁ → J/ψγ mode. Finds a good description of the data without this B⁰ → X(4051)⁺K⁻ decay mode in a fit.

$$ \Gamma(\tau_{c\bar{c}}(4250)^- K^+, \tau_{c\bar{c}}^- \to \chi_{c1} \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{278} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.0 + 2.3 + 19.7<br>- 0.9 - 0.5</td><td>1 MIZUK</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.0</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12B</td><td>BABR</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Uses χc₁ → J/ψγ mode. Finds a good description of the data without this B⁰ → X(4248)⁺K⁻ decay mode in a fit.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} K^{0}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{279} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.16 ± 0.35 ± 0.32</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1} \pi^{-} \pi^{0} K^{+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{280} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.52 ± 0.52 ± 0.24</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2} K^{0}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{281} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>11</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.8 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 SONI</td><td>06</td><td>BELL Repl. by BHARDWAJ 11</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05k</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Uses χc₁,₂ → J/ψγ. Assumes B(Γ(4S) → B⁺B⁻) = (51.6 ± 0.6)% and B(Γ(4S) → B⁰B⁰) = (48.4 ± 0.6)%.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2} K^{*}(892^{0}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}) \qquad \Gamma_{282} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.9 ± 1.2 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr><tr><td>6.6 ± 1.8 ± 0.5</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7.1</td><td>90</td><td>2 SONI</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.6</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05k</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09B</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses χc₁,₂ → J/ψγ. Assumes B(Γ(4S) → B⁺B⁻) = (51.6 ± 0.6)% and B(Γ(4S) → B⁰B⁰) = (48.4 ± 0.6)%.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2} K^{*}(892^{0}) / \Gamma(\chi_{c1} K^{*}(892^{0}))) \qquad \Gamma_{282} / \Gamma_{276} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>20 ± 5 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>17.1 ± 5.0 ± 2.0</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AC</td><td>LHCB p p at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses B(χc₁ → J/ψγ)/B(χc₂ → J/ψγ) = 1.76 ± 0.11.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2} \pi^{-} K^{+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{283} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.72 ± 0.09 ± 0.05</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} K^{0}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{284} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.70 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2} \pi^{-} \pi^{0} K^{+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{285} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.74 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4660) K^0, \psi \to \Lambda_c^+ \Lambda_c^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{286} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.3 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LI</td><td>18D</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes B(Γ(4S) → B⁰B⁰) = 48.6 ± 0.6% and B(Λ_c⁺ pK⁻π⁺) = 6.23 ± 0.33%.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4230) K^0, \psi^0 \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{287} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 GARG</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^{+} \pi^{-}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{288} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>20.0 ± 0.4 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

²**20.0 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE**

<table><tbody><tr><td>20.67 ± 0.37 ± 0.62</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>24</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>20.00 ± 0.34 ± 0.60</td><td>1 DUH</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>19.1 ± 0.6 ± 0.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>18.0 ± 2.3 ± 1.2</td><td>1 BORNHEIM</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>19.9 ± 0.4 ± 0.8</td><td>1 LIN</td><td>07A</td><td>BELL Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>18.5 ± 1.0 ± 0.7</td><td>1 CHAO</td><td>04</td><td>BELL Repl. by LIN 07A</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>17.9 ± 0.9 ± 0.7</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>02Q</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07B</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>22.5 ± 1.3 ± 1.8</td><td>1 CASEY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHAO 04</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>19.3 ± 3.4 ± 1.5</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>01H</td><td>BELL Repl. by CASEY 02</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>16.7 ± 1.6 ± 1.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01E</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 02Q</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 66</td><td>90</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>17.2 &plusmn; 2.5</td><td>2.4 &plusmn; 1.2</td><td>1 CRONIN-HEN-..00</td><td>CLE2</td><td></td><td>Repl. by BORNHEIM 03</td></tr><tr><td>15 &plusmn; 5.4</td><td>&plusmn; 1.4</td><td>GODANG</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by CRONIN-HENNESSY 00</td></tr><tr><td>24 &plusmn; 17</td><td>-11 &plusmn; 2</td><td>3 ADAM</td><td>96D</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 17</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Sup. by ADAM 96D</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 30</td><td>90</td><td>4 BUSKULIC</td><td>96V</td><td>ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 90</td><td>90</td><td>5 ABREU</td><td>95N</td><td>DLPH</td><td>Sup. by ADAM 96D</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 81</td><td>90</td><td>6 AKERS</td><td>94L</td><td>OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 26</td><td>90</td><td>7 BATTLE</td><td>93</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;180</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 90</td><td>90</td><td>8 AVERY</td><td>89B</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;320</td><td>90</td><td>AVERY</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²ABE 00C assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b})=(21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the B fractions $f_{B^0} = f_{B^+} = (39.7^{+1.8}_{-2.2})\%$ and $f_{B_s}=(10.5^{+1.8}_{-2.2})\%$.

³ADAM 96D assumes $f_{B^0} = f_{B^-} = 0.39$ and $f_{B_s} = 0.12$. Contributions from B⁰ and B_s decays cannot be separated. Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.

⁴BUSKULIC 96V assumes PDG 96 production fractions for B⁰, B⁺, B_s, b baryons.

⁵Assumes a B⁰, B⁻ production fraction of 0.39 and a B_s production fraction of 0.12. Contributions from B⁰ and B_s⁰ decays cannot be separated. Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.

⁶Assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = 0.217$ and $B_0^0(B_0^0)$ fraction 39.5% (12%).

⁷BATTLE 93 assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^0$ at T(45).

⁸Assumes the T(45) decays 43% to $B^0$.

$$ \Gamma(K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(K^0\pi^0) \qquad \Gamma_{288}/\Gamma_{289} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.16±0.16±0.16</td><td>LIN</td><td>07A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.20<sup>+0.50</sup><sub>-0.58</sub> ± 0.22</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>01H</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIN 07A</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \frac{[\Gamma(K^+\pi^-) + \Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-)]}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{(\Gamma_{288} + \Gamma_{423})}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>19± 6 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>28<sup>+15</sup><sub>-10</sub> ± 20</td><td>1 ADAM</td><td>96D</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>18<sup>+6</sup><sub>-5</sub> ± 3</td><td>17.2</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>24<sup>+8</sup><sub>-7</sub> ± 2</td><td>2 BATTLE</td><td>93</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ADAM 96D assumes $f_{B^0} = f_{B^-} = 0.39$ and $f_{B_s} = 0.12$. Contributions from B⁰ and B_s decays cannot be separated. Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.

²BATTLE 93 assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^0$ at T(45).

$$ \frac{\Gamma(K^0\pi^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \Gamma_{289}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.1 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>10.73 ± 0.63 ± 0.62</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>24</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>9.68 ± 0.46 ± 0.50</td><td>2 DUH</td><td>13</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>10.1 ± 0.6 ± 0.4</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>13D</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>12.8 ± 4.0<sup>+1.7</sup><sub>-3.3</sub></td><td>2 BORNHEIM</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>8.7 ± 0.5 ± 0.6</td><td>2 FUJIKAWA</td><td>10A</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr><tr><td>10.3 ± 0.7 ± 0.6</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13d</td></tr><tr><td>9.2 ± 0.7 ± 0.6</td><td>2 LIN</td><td>07A</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by FUJIKAWA 10A</td></tr><tr><td>11.4 ± 0.9 ± 0.6</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05Y</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08E</td></tr><tr><td>11.4 ± 1.7 ± 0.8</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>04M</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05Y</td></tr><tr><td>11.7 ± 2.3<sup>+1.2</sup><sub>-1.3</sub></td><td>2 CHAO</td><td>04</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIN 07A</td></tr><tr><td>8.0<sup>+3.3</sup><sub>-3.1</sub> ± 1.6</td><td>2 CASEY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHAO 04</td></tr><tr><td>16.0<sup>+7.2</sup><sub>-5.9</sub> ± 2.5</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>01H</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by CASEY 02</td></tr><tr><td>8.2<sup>+3.1</sup><sub>-2.7</sub> ± 1.2</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>01E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 04M</td></tr><tr><td>14.6<sup>+5.9</sup><sub>-5.1</sub> ± 2.4</td><td>2 CRONIN-HEN..00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by BORNHEIM 03</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;41</td><td>90</td><td>GODANG</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by CRONIN-HENNESSY 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;40</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by GODANG 98</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹This is the combined result of this analysis (ADACHI 24) and the updated analysis of ADACHI 23E. The individual results are $(10.40 \pm 0.66 \pm 0.60) \times 10^{-6}$ and $(11.15 \pm 0.68 \pm 0.62) \times 10^{-6}$, respectively.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\eta^* K^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \Gamma_{290}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>66 ± 4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.4.</td></tr><tr><td>68.5 ± 2.2 ± 3.1</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AV</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>58.9<sup>+3.6</sup><sub>-3.5</sub> ± 4.3</td><td>1 SCHUEMANN</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>89<sup>+18</sup><sub>-16</sub> ± 9</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>66.6 ± 2.6 ± 2.8</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AE</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr><tr><td>67.4 ± 3.3 ± 3.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05M</td><td>BABR</td><td>AUBERT 07AE</td></tr><tr><td>60.6 ± 5.6 ± 4.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03W</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05M</td></tr><tr><td>55<sup>+19</sup><sub>-16</sub> ± 8</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>01M</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by SCHUEMANN 06</td></tr><tr><td>42<sup>+13</sup><sub>-11</sub> ± 4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01G</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 03W</td></tr><tr><td>47<sup>+27</sup><sub>-20</sub> ± 9</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\eta^* K^*(892)^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \Gamma_{291}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.8 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.6 ± 0.7 ± 0.2</td><td>1 SATO</td><td>14</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>3.1<sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-0.8</sub> ± 0.3</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10A</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.8 ± 1.1 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10A</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.6</td><td>90</td><td>1 SCHUEMANN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 7.6</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>04D</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07E</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;24</td><td>90</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;39</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\eta^* K_0^*(1430)^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \Gamma_{292}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.3 ± 1.3 ± 0.9</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10A</td><td>07A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\eta^* K_2^*(1430)^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \Gamma_{293}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>13.7<sup>+3.0</sup><sub>-2.5</sub> ± 1.2</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10A</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>



¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\eta K^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \Gamma_{294}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.23<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.24</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.27<sup>+0.33</sup><sub>-0.29</sub> ± 0.08</td><td>1 HOI</td><td>12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.15<sup>+0.43</sup><sub>-0.38</sub> ± 0.09</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AV</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 1.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>07B</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by HOI 12</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06V</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>05K</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHANG 07B</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04H</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, B 05K</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 9.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;33</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\eta K^*(892)^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \Gamma_{295}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>15.9 ± 1.0 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>15.2 ± 1.2 ± 1.0</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>07B</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>16.5 ± 1.1 ± 0.8</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>13.8<sup>+5.5</sup><sub>-4.6</sub> ± 1.6</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>18.6 ± 2.3 ± 1.2</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>04D</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, B 06H</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;30</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\eta K_0^*(1430)^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \Gamma_{296}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.0 ± 1.6 ± 1.5</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\eta K_2^*(1430)^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \Gamma_{297}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.6 ± 1.8 ± 1.1</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).
Γ(ωK⁰)/Γtotal Γ298/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>4.8 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>4.5 ± 0.4 ± 0.3</td><td></td><td>1 CHOBANOVA</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.4 ± 0.8 ± 0.3</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AE</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>10.0 ± 5.4 ± 1.4</td><td></td><td>1 JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>6.2 ± 1.0 ± 0.4</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06E</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07AE</td></tr><tr><td>4.4 ± 0.8 ± 0.4</td><td>1</td><td>JEN</td><td>06</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHOBANOVA 14</td></tr><tr><td>5.9 ± 1.6 ± 0.5</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04H</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06E</td></tr><tr><td>4.0 ± 1.9 ± 0.5</td><td>1</td><td>WANG</td><td>04A</td><td>BELL Repl. by JEN 06</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;13</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>01G</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 04H</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;57</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

Γ(a₀(980)⁰K⁰, a₀⁰ → ηπ⁰)/Γtotal Γ299/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of charged and neutral B mesons at Υ(4S).

Γ(b₁⁰K⁰, b₁⁰ → ωπ⁰)/Γtotal Γ300/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AG</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

Γ(a₀(980)⁰K∓, a₀⁰ → ηπ⁰)/Γtotal Γ301/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07Y</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07Y</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

Γ(b₁⁻K⁺, b₁⁻ → ωπ⁻)/Γtotal Γ302/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.4 ± 1.0 ± 1.0</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

Γ(b₁⁰K*⁰, b₁⁰ → ωπ⁰)/Γtotal Γ303/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AF</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

Γ(b₁⁻K⁺*, b₁⁻ → ωπ⁻)/Γtotal Γ304/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AF</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

Γ(a₀(1450)⁰K∓, a₀⁰ → ηπ⁰)/Γtotal Γ305/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07Y</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

Γ(K⁰Sχ⁰(Familon))/Γtotal Γ306/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;53</td><td>90</td><td>1 AMMAR</td><td>01B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AMMAR 01B searched for the two-body decay of the B meson to a massless neutral feebly-interacting particle χ⁰ such as the familon, the Nambu-Goldstone boson associated with a spontaneously broken global family symmetry.

Γ(ωK* (892)⁰)/Γtotal Γ307/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>2.0 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>2.2 ± 0.6 ± 0.2</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.8 ± 0.7 ± 0.3</td><td>1</td><td>GOLDENZWE..08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06T</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09H</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05O</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06T</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;23</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

Γ(ω(Kπ*⁰)⁰)/Γtotal Γ308/Γ

(Kπ*⁰)⁰ is the total S-wave composed of K⁰(1430) and nonresonant that are described using LASS shape.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>18.4 ± 1.8 ± 1.7</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

Γ(ωK*⁰(1430)⁰)/Γtotal Γ309/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>16.0 ± 1.6 ± 3.0</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

Γ(ωK*²(1430)⁰)/Γtotal Γ310/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.1 ± 2.0 ± 1.1</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

Γ(ωK⁺π⁻ nonresonant)/Γtotal Γ311/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.1 ± 0.7 ± 0.7</td><td></td><td>1,2 GOLDENZWE..08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

² For the Kπ mass range 0.755-1.250 GeV/c², excluding K*(892).

Γ(K⁺π⁻π⁰)/Γtotal Γ312/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>37.8 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>38.5 ± 1.0 ± 3.9</td><td></td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>11</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>36.6 ± 4.2 ± 3.0</td><td></td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>04</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>35.7 ± 2.6 ± 2.2</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;40</td><td>90</td><td>1 ECKHART</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K⁺π⁻π⁰ decays.

Γ(K⁺ρ⁻)/Γtotal Γ313/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>7.0 ± 0.9 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>6.6 ± 0.5 ± 0.8</td><td></td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>11</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>15.1 ± 3.4 ± 2.4</td><td></td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>04</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;32</td><td>90</td><td>1 JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;35</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.0 ± 0.8 ± 1.3</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr><tr><td>7.3 ± 1.3 ± 1.3</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03T</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AQ</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;32</td><td>90</td><td>1 JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;35</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K⁺π⁻π⁰ decays.

Γ(K⁺ρ(1450)⁰)/Γtotal Γ314/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.4 ± 1.0 ± 0.6</td><td></td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>11</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K⁺π⁻π⁰ decays.

Γ(K⁺ρ(1700)⁰)/Γtotal Γ315/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.6 ± 0.6 ± 0.4</td><td></td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>11</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K⁺π⁻π⁰ decays.

Γ((Kπ⁺π⁻)⁰)/Γtotal Γ316/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.8 ± 0.5 ± 0.4</td><td></td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>11</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.4 ± 0.9 ± 0.5</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;9.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>04</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K⁺π⁻π⁰ decays. The quoted value is only for the flat part of the non-resonant component.

Γ((Kπ*⁰)⁰ + ρ⁻, (Kπ*⁰)⁰ + K⁺π⁰)/Γtotal Γ317/Γ

(Kπ*⁰)⁰ is the total S-wave composed of K⁰(1430) and nonresonant that are described using LASS shape.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>34.2 ± 2.4 ± 4.1</td><td></td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>11</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.4 ± 1.1 ± 2.3</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr><tr><td>1.3 ± 2.1</td><td></td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>04</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K⁺π⁻π⁰ decays.
$$ \Gamma((K\pi)_0^0\pi^0, (K\pi)_0^0 \rightarrow K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{318}/\Gamma \\ (K\pi)_0^0 \text{ is the total S-wave composed of } K_0^*(1430) \text{ and nonresonant that are described using LASS shape.} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.6±1.1±1.3</td><td></td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>11</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>8.7+1.1+2.8<br/>-0.9-2.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K⁺π⁻π⁰ decays.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sub>2</sub><sup>*</sup>(1430)⁰π⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K*(1680)⁰π⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sub>x</sub><sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>K<sub>x</sub><sup>0</sup> stands for the possible candidates of K*(1410), K<sub>x</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430) and K<sub>x</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430).</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.1+1.6+0.5<br/>-1.5-0.6</td><td></td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>04</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>49.7±1.8 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

49.6± 2.0 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>50.2± 1.5±1.8</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>47.5± 2.4±3.7</td><td>2 GARMASH</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>50 +10/9 ±7</td><td>1 ECKHART</td><td>02 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>43.0± 2.3±2.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>06I BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AU</td></tr><tr><td>43.7± 3.8±3.4</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04O BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 06I</td></tr><tr><td>45.4± 5.2±5.9</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by GARMASH 07</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;440</td><td>90 ALBRECHT</td><td>91E ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K⁰π⁺π⁻ final state decays.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>nonresonant)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>13.9+2.6<br/>-1.8 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tr><td>12.1±0.6±2.9</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>11.1±2.5<br/>-1.0±0.9</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>19.9±2.5+1.7<br/>-2.0</td><td>3 GARMASH</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K⁰π⁺π⁻ final state decays. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 18 average B(B⁰ → K⁰Sπ⁺π⁻) = (4.96 ± 0.20) × 10⁻⁵ is used.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K⁰π⁺π⁻ final state decays.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
13.9+2.6-1.8 (Error scaled by 1.6)

<figure><img src="image_600.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(K^0\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{324}/\Gamma \\ \text{VALUE (units 10}^{-6}\text{)} \qquad \text{CL}\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

3.4 ±1.1 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.3. See the ideogram

below.

<table><tr><td>1.89+0.55<br/>-0.79±0.40</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>4.4 +0.7<br/>-0.6 ±0.3</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>6.1 ±1.0 +1.1<br/>-1.2</td><td>3 GARMASH</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>4.9 ±0.8 ±0.9</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07F BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AU</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;39</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;320</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;500</td><td>90</td><td>4 AVERY</td><td>89B CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K⁰Sπ⁺π⁻ final state decays. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 18 average B(B⁰ → K⁰Sπ⁺π⁻) = (4.96 ± 0.20) × 10⁻⁵ is used.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K⁰π⁺π⁻ final state decays.

⁴AVERY 89B reports < 5.8 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(4S) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
3.4±1.1 (Error scaled by 2.3)

<figure><img src="image_601.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(K*(892)^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{325}/\Gamma \\ \text{VALUE (units 10}^{-6}\text{)} \qquad \text{CL}\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>7.02±0.30±0.45</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>8.0 ±1.1 ±0.8</td><td>2,3 LEES</td><td>11 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>8.3 +0.9<br/>-0.8 ±0.8</td><td>3,4 AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>8.4 ±1.1 +1.0<br/>-0.9</td><td>4 GARMASH</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>16 +6/5 ±2</td><td>3 ECKHART</td><td>02 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>12.6 +2.7<br/>-1.6 ±0.9</td><td>2,3 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>11.0 ±1.5 ±0.71</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>06I BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AU</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>12.9 ±2.4 ±1.4</td><td>3 AUBERT,B</td><td>04O BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 06I</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>14.8 +4.6 +2.8<br/>-4.4-1.3</td><td>3 CHANG</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by GARMASH 07</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;72</td><td>90 ASNER</td><td>96 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;620</td><td>90 ALBRECHT</td><td>91B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;380</td><td>90 AVERY</td><td>89B CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;560</td><td>90 AVERY</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K⁰Sπ⁺π⁻ final state decays. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 18 average B(B⁰ → K⁰Sπ⁺π⁻) = (4.96 ± 0.20) × 10⁻⁵ is used.

²Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K⁺π⁻π⁰ decays.

³Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

⁴Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K⁰π⁺π⁻ final state decays.

⁵AVERY 89B reports < 4.4 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(4S) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

⁶AVERY 87 reports < 7 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(4S) decays 40% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K^0(1430)^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{326}/\Gamma \\ \text{VALUE (units 10}^{-6}\text{)} \qquad \text{CL}\% \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

33 ±7 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.0.

<table><tr><td>29.9+2.3<br/>-1.7±3.6</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>49.7±3.8+6.8<br/>-8.2</td><td>2 GARMASH</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>
Meson Particle Listings

$B^0$

See key on page 1171

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-$ final state decays.

$$ \Gamma(K_x^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{327}/\Gamma $$

$K_x^{*+}$ stands for the possible candidates of $K^*(1410)$, $K_0^*(1430)$ and $K_2^*(1430)$.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.1±1.5<sup>+0.6</sup><sub>-0.7</sub></td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>04</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(1410)^+\pi^-, K^*+ \to K^0\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{328}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>07</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-$ final state decays.

$$ \Gamma(K\pi_0^+\pi^- , (K\pi_0^+\to K^0\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{329}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>16.2±0.69±1.15</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-$ final state decays. ($K\pi_0^+\to K^0\pi^+\pi^-$ is the S-wave component of $K^0\pi^+$. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 18 average $B(B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.96 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-5}$ is used.

$$ \Gamma(f_0(980)K^0, f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{330}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>8.1 ±0.8</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>9.23 ± 0.40 ± 0.79</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6.9 ± 0.8 ± 0.6</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>7.6 ± 1.7 <sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-1.3</sub></td><td>3 GARMASH</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.5 ± 0.7 ± 0.6</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>06I BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AU</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;360</td><td>90</td><td>4 AVERY</td><td>89B CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-$ final state decays. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 18 average $B(B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.96 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-5}$ is used.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-$ final state decays.

⁴AVERY 89B reports $< 4.2 \times 10^{-4}$ assuming the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

<figure><img src="image_602.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(K^0 f_0(500))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{331}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.16<sup>+0.20</sup><sub>-0.04</sub> ± 0.15</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-$ final state decays. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 18 average $B(B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.96 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-5}$ is used.

$$ \Gamma(K^0 f_0(1500))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{332}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.29 ± 0.27 ± 0.70</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-$ final state decays. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 18 average $B(B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.96 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-5}$ is used.

$$ \Gamma(f_2(1270)K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{333}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.7<sup>+1.0</sup><sub>-0.8</sub> ± 0.9</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²GARMASH 07 reports $B(B^0 \to f_2(1270)K^0) \times B(f_2(1270) \to \pi^+\pi^-) < 1.4 \times 10^{-6}$ using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute $B(B^0 \to f_2(1270)K^0)$ using the PDG value $B(f_2(1270) \to \pi\pi) = 84.3 \times 10^{-2}$ and 2/3 for the $\pi^+\pi^-$ fraction.

$$ \Gamma(f_4(1300)K^0, f_4 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{334}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.81<sup>+0.55</sup><sub>-0.45</sub> ± 0.48</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{335}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.3±0.5±0.4</td><td></td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>11 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.6 ± 0.7 ± 0.4</td><td></td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 3.5</td><td>90</td><td>2 CHANG</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 3.6</td><td>90</td><td>JESSOP</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;28</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decays.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(K_2^*(1430)^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{336}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.65<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.12</sub> ± 0.31</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 16.2</td><td>90</td><td>2,3 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 6</td><td>90</td><td>4 GARMASH</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 18</td><td>90</td><td>3 GARMASH</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by GARMASH 07</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2600</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-$ final state decays. We compute $B(B^0 \to K_2^*(1430)^+\pi^-)$ using the PDG 18 value $B(K_2^*(1430) \to K\pi) = 49.9 \times 10^{-2}$ and 2/3 for the $K^0\pi^+$ fraction. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 18 average $B(B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.96 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-5}$ is used.

²Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decays.

³Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁴GARMASH 07 reports $B(B^0 \to K_2^*(1430)^+\pi^-) \times B(K^*+ \to K^0\pi^+) < 2.1 \times 10^{-6}$ using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute $B(B^0 \to K_2^*(1430)^+\pi^-)$ using the PDG value $B(K_2^*(1430) \to K\pi) = 49.9 \times 10^{-2}$ and 2/3 for the $K^0\pi^+$ fraction.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(1680)^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{337}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>14.1±0.58±0.84</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;25</td><td>90</td><td>2,3 AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;10</td><td>90</td><td>4 GARMASH</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-$ final state decays. We compute $B(B^0 \to K_2^*(1430)^+\pi^-)$ using the PDG 18 value $B(K_2^*(1430) \to K\pi) = (49.9 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-2}$ and 2/3 for the $K^0\pi^+$ fraction. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 18 average $B(B^0 \to K_0^S\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.96 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-5}$ is used.

²Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decays.

³Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁴GARMASH 07 reports $B(B^0 \to K^*(1680)^+\pi^-) \times B(K^*+ \to K^0\pi^+) < 2.6 \times 10^{-6}$ using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute $B(B^0 \to K^*(1680)^+\pi^-)$ using the PDG value $B(K^*(1680) \to K\pi) = 38.7 \times 10^{-2}$ and 2/3 for the $K^0\pi^+$ fraction.

$$ \Gamma(K^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{338}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.3 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ADAM</td><td>96D DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.1 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 ABREU</td><td>95N DLPH</td><td>Sup. by ADAM 96D</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ADAM 96D assumes $f_0^B = f_0^B = 0.39$ and $f_5^B = 0.12$. Contributions from $B^0$ and $B_5^0$ decays cannot be separated. Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.

²Assumes a $B^0, B^-$ production fraction of 0.39 and a $B_5^0$ production fraction of 0.12. Contributions from $B^0$ and $B_5^0$ decays cannot be separated. Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^0 K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{339}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.8±0.5±0.5</td><td>1,2 KYEONG</td><td>09 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Required $0.75 < m_{K^+\pi^-} < 1.20 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

$$ \Gamma(f_0(980)K^+\pi^-, f_0 \to \pi\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{340}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.4±0.4<sup>+0.3</sup><sub>-0.4</sub></td><td></td><td>1,2 KYEONG</td><td>09</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²Required 0.75 < m<sub>K⁺π⁻</sub> < 1.2 GeV/c².

$$ \Gamma(K^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^- \text{ nonresonant})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{341}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 KYEONG</td><td>09</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²Required 0.55 < m<sub>π⁺π⁻</sub> < 1.42 and 0.75 < m<sub>K⁺π⁻</sub> < 1.20 GeV/c².

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{342}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>54.5±2.9±4.3</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AS</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>4.5<sup>+1.1</sup><sub>-1.0</sub>±0.9</td><td>1,2 KYEONG</td><td>09</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;1400</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²Required 0.55 < m<sub>π⁺π⁻</sub> < 1.42 GeV/c².

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{343}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5">3.9±1.3 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tr><td>5.1±0.6<sup>+0.6</sup><sub>-0.8</sub></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12k</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.1<sup>+0.8</sup><sub>-0.7</sub>±0.9</td><td>1 KYEONG</td><td>09</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>5.6±0.9±1.3</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06G</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 12k</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 34</td><td>90</td><td>2 GODANG</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;286</td><td>90</td><td>3 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;460</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;580</td><td>90</td><td>4 AVERY</td><td>89B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;960</td><td>90</td><td>5 AVERY</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 2.4 × 10⁻⁵.

³ABE 00c assumes B(Z → bD̄)=(21.7 ± 0.1)% and the B fractions f<sub>B0</sub>=f<sub>B+</sub>=(39.7+1.8)% and f<sub>B<sub>S</sub></sub>=(10.5+1.8)%.

⁴AVERY 89b reports < 6.7 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(45) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

⁵AVERY 87 reports < 1.2 × 10⁻³ assuming the T(45) decays 40% to B⁰B̄⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{344}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5">3.9+2.1<sup>-1.8</sup> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tr><td>5.7±0.6±0.4</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12k</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.4<sup>+0.6</sup><sub>-0.5</sub>±0.6</td><td>1,2 KYEONG</td><td>09</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 4.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;170</td><td>90</td><td>3 AVERY</td><td>89B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²The upper limit is 2.2 × 10⁻⁶ at 90% CL.

³AVERY 89b reports < 2.0 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(45) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K_1(1270)\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{345}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>10D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(K_1(1400)\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{346}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>10D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(a_1(1260)^-K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{347}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>16.3±2.9±2.3</td><td></td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>08F</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;230</td><td>90</td><td>3 ADAM</td><td>96D</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;390</td><td>90</td><td>4 ABREU</td><td>95N</td><td>DLPH Sup. by ADAM 96D</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²Assumes e<sup>+</sup> decays only to 3π and B(a<sup>+</sup><sub>1</sub> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>−</sup>π<sup>−</sup>) = 0.5.

³ADAM 96D assumes f<sub>B0</sub> = f<sub>B<sub>S</sub></sub> = 0.39 and f<sub>B<sub>S</sub></sub> = 0.12. Contributions from B⁰ and B<sub>S</sub> decays cannot be separated. Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.

⁴Assumes a B⁰, B⁻ production fraction of 0.39 and a B<sub>S</sub> production fraction of 0.12. Contributions from B⁰ and B<sub>S</sub>⁰ decays cannot be separated. Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^+\rho^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{348}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.3±2.3±1.3</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12k</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;12.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06G</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 12k</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(K_0^*(1430)\rho^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{349}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>28±10±6</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12k</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(K_1(1400)^0\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{350}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_0^*(1430)^0\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{351}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>27±4±4</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12k</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(K_0^*(1430)^0 f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{352}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.7±0.7±0.6</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12k</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(K_2^*(1430)^0 f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{353}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.6±1.7±1.0</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12k</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{354}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.80±1.27±0.84</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17G</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>10</td><td>± 8</td><td>± 4</td><td>2,3 DUH</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>12</td><td>± 8</td><td>± 2</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>12AR</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 17G</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>23</td><td>±10</td><td>±10</td><td>5 AALTONEN</td><td>12L</td><td>CDF pπ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 70</td><td>90</td><td>6 AALTONEN</td><td>09C</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTO-NEN 12L</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 50</td><td>90</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>07B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 41</td><td>90</td><td>3 LIN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 180</td><td>90</td><td>7 ABULENCIA,A</td><td>06D</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTO-NEN 09C</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 37</td><td>90</td><td>ABE</td><td>05G</td><td>BELL Repl. by LIN 07</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 70</td><td>90</td><td>CHAO</td><td>04</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 80</td><td>90</td><td>3 BORNHEIM</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 60</td><td>90</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>02Q</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 90</td><td>90</td><td>3 CASEY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 270</td><td>90</td><td>3 ABE</td><td>01H</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 250</td><td>90</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>01E</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 6600</td><td>90</td><td>8 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 190</td><td>90</td><td>3 CRONIN-HEN..</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 430</td><td>90</td><td>GODANG</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by CRONIN-HENNESSY 00</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 4600</td><td>90</td><td>9 ADAM</td><td>96D</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 400</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by GO-DANG 98</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 1800</td><td>90</td><td>10 BUSKULIC</td><td>96V</td><td>ALEP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;12000</td><td>90</td><td>11 ABREU</td><td>95N</td><td>DLPH Sup. by ADAM 96D</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 700</td><td>90</td><td>3 BATTLE</td><td>93</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

¹Supercedes results of AAIJ 12AR.

²DUH 13 reports also for the same data B(B⁰ → K⁺K⁻) < 0.20 × 10⁻⁶ at 90% CL.

³Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

⁴AAIJ 12AR reports [Γ(B⁰ → K⁺K⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> / [B(B⁰ → K⁺K⁻)] / [Γ(B̄ → B⁰<sub>S</sub>)] = 0.018+0.008/-0.007 ± 0.009 which we multiply by our best values B(B⁰<sub>S</sub> → K⁺K⁻) = (2.72 ± 0.23) × 10⁻⁵, Γ(B̄ → B⁰<sub>S</sub>) / Γ(B̄ → B⁰) = 0.246 ± 0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

⁵Reported a central value of (0.23 ± 0.10 ± 0.10) × 10⁻⁶ using B(B⁰ → K⁺π⁻) = (19.4 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁶.

⁶Obtains this result from B(K⁺K⁻)/B(K⁺π⁻) = 0.020 ± 0.008 ± 0.006, assuming B(B⁰ → K⁺π⁻) = (19.4 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁶.