# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

### Γ(τX)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.968±0.019<sup>+0.041</sup><sub>-0.039</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.983±0.030<sup>+0.054</sup><sub>-0.051</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

### Γ(cX)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.234±0.012<sup>+0.018</sup><sub>-0.014</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.330±0.022<sup>+0.055</sup><sub>-0.037</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

### Γ(c/τX)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.202±0.023<sup>+0.053</sup><sub>-0.049</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.313±0.037<sup>+0.088</sup><sub>-0.075</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

### Γ(D⁰π⁺)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻³)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

#### 4.61±0.10 OUR FIT

#### 4.63±0.10 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.53±0.02±0.15</td><td>BLOOMFIELD</td><td>22</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.34±0.10±0.23</td><td>1 KATO</td><td>18</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.90±0.07±0.22</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.9 ± 0.6 ± 0.2</td><td>3 ABULENCIA</td><td>06J</td><td>CDF p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>4.49±0.21±0.23</td><td>4 AUBERT, BE</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.97±0.12±0.29</td><td>2,5 AHMED</td><td>02B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.0 ± 0.7 ± 0.6</td><td>6 BORTOLETTO</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.4 ± 1.8 ± 1.2</td><td>7 BEBEK</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.4 ± 1.5 ± 0.9</td><td>14</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.68±0.26±0.04</td><td>8 AUBERT, B</td><td>04P</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07H</td></tr><tr><td>5.5 ± 0.4 ± 0.5</td><td>9 ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by AHMED 02B</td></tr><tr><td>2.0 ± 0.8 ± 0.6</td><td>6 ALBRECHT</td><td>90J</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.9 ± 1.0 ± 0.6</td><td>7</td><td>10 ALBRECHT</td><td>88K ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measures absolute branching fractions using a missing-mass technique.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³ ABULENCIA 06J reports [Γ(B⁺ → D⁰π⁺)/Γtotal] / [B(B⁰ → D⁻π⁺)] = 1.97 ± 0.10 ± 0.21 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰ → D⁻π⁺) = (2.51 ± 0.08) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ Uses a missing-mass method. Does not depend on D branching fractions or B⁺/B⁰ production rates.

⁵ AHMED 02B reports an additional uncertainty on the branching ratios to account for 4.5% uncertainty on relative production of B⁰ and B⁺, which is not included here.

⁶ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S) and uses the Mark III branching fractions for the D.

⁷ BEBEK 87 value has been updated in BERKELMAN 91 to use some assumptions as noted for BORTOLETTO 92.

⁸ AUBERT, B 04P reports [Γ(B⁺ → D⁰π⁺)/Γtotal] × [B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺)] = (1.846 ± 0.032 ± 0.097) × 10⁻⁴ which we divide by our best value B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺) = (3.947 ± 0.030) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁹ ALAM 94 assume equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S) and use the CLEO II absolute B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺) and the PDG 1992 B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺π⁰)/B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺) and B(D⁰ → K⁻2π⁺π⁻)/B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺).

¹⁰ ALBRECHT 88K assumes B⁰B⁰:B⁺B⁻ ratio is 45:55. Superseded by ALBRECHT 90J.

### Γ(D⁰ρ⁺)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0134±0.0018 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0135±0.0012±0.0015</td><td>212</td><td>1 ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.013 ± 0.004 ± 0.004</td><td>19</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>90J</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.021 ± 0.008 ± 0.009</td><td>10</td><td>3 ALBRECHT</td><td>88K ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ ALAM 94 assume equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S) and use the CLEO II absolute B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺) and the PDG 1992 B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺π⁰)/B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺) and B(D⁰ → K⁻2π⁺π⁻)/B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺).

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S) and uses the Mark III branching fractions for the D.

³ ALBRECHT 88K assumes B⁰B⁰:B⁺B⁻ ratio is 45:55.

### Γ(D⁰K⁺)/Γ(D⁰π⁺)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻²)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.89 ± 0.27 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.3. See the ideogram below.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>7.96 ± 0.03 ± 0.13</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6.77 ± 0.23 ± 0.30</td><td>HORII</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>8.31 ± 0.35 ± 0.20</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>9.9 ± 1.4 ± 0.7</td><td>BORNHEIM</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.2 ± 0.6</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>7.768±0.038±0.066</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>18A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>7.79 ± 0.06 ± 0.19</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>7.93 ± 0.10 ± 0.18</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>7.71 ± 0.17 ± 0.26</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>13AE</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr><tr><td>7.74 ± 0.12 ± 0.19</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12M</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr><tr><td>9.4 ± 0.9</td><td>ABE</td><td>03D</td><td>BELL Repl. by SWAIN 03</td></tr><tr><td>7.7 ± 0.5 ± 0.6</td><td>SWAIN</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by HORII 08</td></tr><tr><td>7.9 ± 0.9 ± 0.6</td><td>ABE</td><td>01I</td><td>BELL Repl. by ABE 03D</td></tr><tr><td>5.5 ± 1.4 ± 0.5</td><td>ATHANAS</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by BORNHEIM 03</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Supersedes AAIJ 16L.

² Supersedes AAIJ 21Q.

³ Uses B⁺ → [K∓π⁺π⁻]ₔD b⁺ mode.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
7.89±0.27 (Error scaled by 2.3)

<figure><img src="image_579.png" /></figure>

### Γ(D<sub>CP</sub>(+1)K⁺)/Γ(D<sub>CP</sub>(+1)π⁺)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.089±0.008 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.089±0.008±0.003</td><td>1,2 ABE</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.088±0.016±0.005</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>04N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.125±0.036±0.010</td><td>3 ABE</td><td>03D</td><td>BELL Repl. by SWAIN 03</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.093±0.018±0.008</td><td>3 SWAIN</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by ABE 06</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Reports a double ratio of B(B⁺ → D<sub>CP</sub>(+1)K⁺)/B(B⁺ → D<sub>CP</sub>(+1)π⁺) and B(B⁺ → D⁰K⁺)/B(B⁺ → D⁰π⁺), 1.13 ± 0.16 ± 0.08. We multiply by our best value of B(B⁺ → D⁰K⁺)/B(B⁺ → D⁰π⁺) = 0.083 ± 0.006. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

² ABE 06 reports [Γ(B⁺ → D<sub>CP</sub>(+1)K⁺)/Γ(B⁺ → D<sub>CP</sub>(+1)π⁺)] / [Γ(B⁺ → D⁰K⁺)/Γ(B⁺ → D⁰π⁺)] = 1.13 ± 0.06 ± 0.08 which we multiply by our best value Γ(B⁺ → D⁰K⁺)/Γ(B⁺ → D⁰π⁺) = 0.0789 ± 0.0027. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is systematic error from using our best value.

³ CP=1 eigenstate of D⁰D⁰ system is reconstructed via K⁺K⁻ and π⁺π⁻.

### Γ(D<sub>CP</sub>(+1)K⁺)/Γ(D⁰K⁺)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.495±0.007 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.494±0.008±0.006</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.496±0.014±0.008</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>18A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.489±0.010±0.008</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.65 ± 0.12 ± 0.06</td><td>4 AALTONEN</td><td>10A</td><td>CDF p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.590±0.045±0.025</td><td>5 DEL-AMO-SA..10G</td><td>87</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.504±0.019±0.006</td><td>6 AAIJ</td><td>12M</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr><tr><td>0.53 ± 0.05 ± 0.025</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AA</td><td>BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10G</td></tr><tr><td>0.45 ± 0.06 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AA</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses D → K⁺K⁻ decay mode and reports R<sub>CP+</sub> = 0.988 ± 0.015 ± 0.011 which we have divided by 2.

² Uses D → π⁺π⁻ decay mode and reports R<sub>CP+</sub> = 0.992 ± 0.027 ± 0.015 which we have divided by 2.

³ AAIJ 16L reports R<sub>CP+</sub> = 0.978 ± 0.019 ± 0.018 which we have divided by 2.

⁴ Reports R<sub>CP+</sub> = 2 (B(B⁻ → D<sub>CP</sub>(+1)K⁻) + B(B⁺ → D<sub>CP</sub>(+1)K⁺)) / (B(B⁻ → D⁰K⁻) + B(B⁺ → D⁰K⁺)) = 1.30 ± 0.24 ± 0.12 that we have divided by 2.

⁵ Reports R<sub>CP+</sub> = 1.18 ± 0.09 ± 0.05 that we have divided by 2.

⁶ AAIJ 12M reports R<sub>CP+</sub> = 1.007 ± 0.038 ± 0.012 which we have divided by 2.
$$ \Gamma(D_{CP}(-1)K^{+})/\Gamma(D_{CP}(-1)\pi^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{60}/\Gamma_{56} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.097±0.016±0.007</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.119±0.028±0.006</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>03D</td><td>BELL Repl. by SWAIN 03</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.108±0.019±0.007</td><td>2 SWAIN</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by ABE 06</td></tr></table>

¹Reports a double ratio of $B(B^{+} \to D_{CP}(-1)K^{+})/B(B^{+} \to D_{CP}(-1)\pi^{+})$ and $B(B^{+} \to D^{0}K^{+})/B(B^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+})$, 1.17 ± 0.14 ± 0.14. We multiply by our best value of $B(B^{+} \to D^{0}K^{+})/B(B^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}) = 0.083 \pm 0.006$. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

²$CP_{-1}$ eigenstate of $D^{0}\bar{D}^{0}$ system is reconstructed via $K_{S}^{0}\pi^{0}$, $K_{S}^{0}\omega$, $K_{S}^{0}\phi$, $K_{S}^{0}\eta$, and $K_{S}^{0}\eta'$.

$$ \Gamma(D_{CP}(-1)K^{+})/\Gamma(D^{0}K^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{60}/\Gamma_{58} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.54 ± 0.04 ± 0.02</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10G</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.515 ± 0.05 ± 0.025</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AA</td><td>BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10G</td></tr><tr><td>0.43 ± 0.05 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AA</td></tr></table>

¹Reports $R_{CP_{+}} = 1.07 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.04$ that we have divided by 2.

$$ \Gamma(D^{0}K^{+})/\Gamma(D^{0}\bar{K}^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{61}/\Gamma_{58} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.88 ± 0.52 OUR EVALUATION</td><td></td><td></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma([K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{62}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.8 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>HORII</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;6.3 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>SAIGO</td><td>05</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma([K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}K^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{62}/\Gamma_{63} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>14 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 14.7.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>9.5 ± 0.5 ± 0.3</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>25.2 ± 0.8 ± 0.4</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>21Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>22.0 ± 8.6 ± 2.6</td><td>3 AALTONEN</td><td>11AJ</td><td>CDF p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>16.3 ± 4.4 ± 0.7</td><td>HORII</td><td>11</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-4.1 ± 1.3</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..10H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>11 ± 6 ± 2</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>18.8 ± 1.1 ± 1.0</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>15.2 ± 2.0 ± 0.4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12M</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr><tr><td>7.8 ± 6.2 ± 2.0</td><td>HORII</td><td>08</td><td>BELL Repl. by HORII 11</td></tr><tr><td>-5.7 ± 2.8</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;29</td><td>90</td><td>5 AUBERT</td><td>05G BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10H</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;44</td><td>90</td><td>6 SAIGO</td><td>05 e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;26</td><td>90</td><td>7 AUBERT,B</td><td>04L BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05G</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses the ratio of $B^{-} \to [K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}K^{-}$ and $B^{-} \to [K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{-}$. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-average rate as 0.0173 ± 0.0006, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

²Uses the ratio of $B^{+} \to [K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+}$ and $B^{+} \to [K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}K^{+}$. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-average rate as 0.0173 ± 0.0006, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

³AALTONEN 11AJ also measures the ratio separately for $B^{+}(R^{+}(K))$ and $B^{-}(R^{-}(K))$ and obtains: $R^{+}(K) = (42.6 \pm 13.7 \pm 2.8) \times 10^{-3}$, $R^{-}(K) = (3.8 \pm 10.3 \pm 2.7) \times 10^{-3}$.
⁴Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

⁵AUBERT 05G extract a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes $|A(B^{+} \to D^{0}K^{+}) / A(B^{+} \to D^{0}\bar{K}^{+})| < 0.23$ at 90% CL (Bayesian). Similar measurements from $B^{+} \to D^{0}K^{+}$ are also reported.

⁶SAIGO 05 extract a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes $|A(B^{+} \to D^{0}K^{+}) / A(B^{+} \to D^{0}\bar{K}^{+})| < 0.27$ at 90% CL.

⁷AUBERT,B 04L extract a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes $|A(B^{+} \to D^{0}K^{+})/A(B^{+} \to D^{0}\bar{K}^{+})| < 0.22$ at 90% CL.

$$ \Gamma([K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}]_{D}K^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}]_{D}K^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{64}/\Gamma_{65} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>13.1 ± 1.6 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>12.7 ± 1.6 ± 0.2</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>19.8 ± 6.2 ± 2.4</td><td>NAYAK</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>14.0 ± 4.7 ± 2.1</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15W</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 22T</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;21</td><td>90</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>11D BABR e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;39</td><td>95</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>07BN BABR Repl. by LEES 11D</td></tr></table>

¹Uses $D^{0} \to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}$ for the favored mode, and $D^{0} \to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}$ for the suppressed mode.

²Extracts a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes $|A(B^{+} \to D^{0}K^{+})/A(B^{+} \to D^{0}\bar{K}^{+})| < 0.13$ at 95% CL.

³Extracts a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes $|A(B^{+} \to D^{0}K^{+})/A(B^{+} \to D^{0}\bar{K}^{+})| < 0.19$ at 95% CL.

$$ \Gamma([K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}K^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{66}/\Gamma_{67} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.333 ± 0.055 ± 0.008</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23I</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.40 ± 0.15 ± 0.06</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.24 ± 0.27</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AE</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr></table>

¹Superseded by AAIJ 23I.

$$ \Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}K^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{68}/\Gamma_{67} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.975 ± 0.037 ± 0.019</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma([K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+}(892)^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}K^{+}(892)^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{70}/\Gamma_{71} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.012 ± 0.004 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.011 ± 0.004 ± 0.001</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BO</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.066 ± 0.031 ± 0.010</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AJ</td><td>BABR e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.046 ± 0.031 ± 0.008</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05V</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AJ</td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma([K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}K^{+}(892)^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+}(892)^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{72}/\Gamma_{73} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.011 ± 0.005 ± 0.003</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BO</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+}(892)^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+}(892)^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{69}/\Gamma_{73} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.08 ± 0.13 ± 0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BO</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma([K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}\pi^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{74}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.29 ± 1.02 ± 0.37</td><td>HORII</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.98 ± 0.48</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>6.6 ± 1.9 ± 0.5</td><td>SAIGO</td><td>05</td><td>BELL Repl. by HORII 08</td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma([K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}]_{D}\pi^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}]_{D}\pi^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{74}/\Gamma_{75} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.6 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 7.9.</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

4.15 ± 0.08 ± 0.04

¹ AAIJ 21Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

3.20 ± 0.07 ± 0.04

² AAIJ 21Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

2.8 ± 0.7 ± 0.4

³ AALTONEN 11AJ CDF p̄ at 1.96 TeV

3.28 ± 0.38 ± 0.12

HORII 11 BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)

3.3 ± 0.6 ± 0.4

DEL-AMO-SA..10H BABR e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

3.60 ± 0.12 ± 0.09

⁴ AAIJ 16L LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

4.10 ± 0.25 ± 0.05

AAIJ 12M LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16L

3.40 ± 0.55 ± 0.15

HORII 08 BELL Repl. by HORII 11

3.5 ± 1.0 ± 0.2

SAIGO 05 BELL Repl. by HORII 08

¹Uses the ratio of $B^{-} \to [K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}K^{-}$ and $B^{-} \to [K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{-}$. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-average rate as 0.00368 ± 0.00007, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

²Uses the ratio of $B^{+} \to [K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}\pi^{+}$ and $B^{+} \to [K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}\pi^{+}$. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-average rate as 0.00368 ± 0.00007, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

³AALTONEN 11AJ also measures the ratio separately for $B^{+}(R^{+}(\pi))$ and $B^{-}(R^{-}(\pi))$ and obtains: $R^{+}(\pi) = (2.4 \pm 1.0 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$, $R^{-}(\pi) = (3.1 \pm 1.1 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$.

⁴Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

$$ \Gamma([K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}]_{D}\pi^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}]_{D}\pi^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{76}/\Gamma_{77} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.05 ± 0.19 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.07 ± 0.20 ± 0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.89 ± 0.54 ± 0.22</td><td>NAYAK</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.35 ± 0.49 ± 0.06</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15W</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 22T</td></tr></table>

¹Uses $D^{0} \to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}$ for the favored mode, and $D^{0} \to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}$ for the suppressed mode.

$$ \Gamma([K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}\pi^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}\pi^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{78}/\Gamma_{79} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.45 ± 0.07 ± 0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23I</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>3.77 ± 0.18 ± 0.06</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>3.7 ± 0.4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AE</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr></table>

¹Superseded by AAIJ 23I.
# Meson Particle Listings

B$^{±}$

$$\Gamma([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\pi}) \pi^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\pi}) \pi^{+})$$

$$\Gamma_{80}/\Gamma_{81}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

## 4.4 ±0.6 OUR AVERAGE

Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

$$4.05 \pm 0.56 \pm 0.59$$

1 AAIJ

21Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$$5.36 \pm 0.56 \pm 0.58$$

1 AAIJ

21Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$$3.2 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.8$$

DEL-AMO-SA..10H BABR $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

1. Uses the ratio of $B^{-} \rightarrow ([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\pi} \pi^{0})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$ and $B^{-} \rightarrow ([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\pi} \pi^{0})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$, without inclusion of the neutral pion in the reconstruction. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-averaged rate as 0.00471 ± 0.00077, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

2. Uses the ratio of $B^{+} \rightarrow ([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\pi} \pi^{0})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$ and $B^{+} \rightarrow ([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\pi} \pi^{0})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$, without inclusion of the neutral pion in the reconstruction. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-averaged rate as 0.00471 ± 0.00077, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

$$\Gamma([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\pi}) \pi^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\pi}) \pi^{+})$$

$$\Gamma_{82}/\Gamma_{83}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

## 4.1 ±1.0 OUR AVERAGE

$$4.72 \pm 0.92 \pm 1.18$$

1 AAIJ

21Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$$4.03 \pm 0.91 \pm 1.14$$

1 AAIJ

21Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$$2.7 \pm 1.4 \pm 2.2$$

DEL-AMO-SA..10H BABR $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

1. Uses the ratio of $B^{-} \rightarrow ([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\gamma})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$ and $B^{-} \rightarrow ([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\gamma})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$, without inclusion of the photon in the reconstruction. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-averaged rate as 0.00420 ± 0.00138, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

2. Uses the ratio of $B^{+} \rightarrow ([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\gamma})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$ and $B^{+} \rightarrow ([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\gamma})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$, without inclusion of the photon in the reconstruction. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-averaged rate as 0.00420 ± 0.00138, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

$$\Gamma([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\pi}) K^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\pi}) K^{+})$$

$$\Gamma_{84}/\Gamma_{85}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

## 2.8 ±2.8 OUR AVERAGE

Error includes scale factor of 3.0. See the ideogram below.

$$20.2 \pm 3.5 \pm 2.3$$

1 AAIJ

21Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$$3.3 \pm 3.5 \pm 2.2$$

1 AAIJ

21Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$$1.8 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.4$$

DEL-AMO-SA..10H BABR $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

1. Uses the ratio of $B^{-} \rightarrow ([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\pi})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$ and $B^{-} \rightarrow ([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\pi})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$, without inclusion of the neutral pion in the reconstruction. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-averaged rate as 0.0118 ± 0.0034, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

2. Uses the ratio of $B^{+} \rightarrow ([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\pi} \pi^{0})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$ and $B^{+} \rightarrow ([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\pi} \pi^{0})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$, without inclusion of the neutral pion in the reconstruction. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-averaged rate as 0.0118 ± 0.0034, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

<figure><img src="image_580.png" /></figure>

$$\Gamma([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\gamma}) K^{+})/\Gamma([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\gamma}) K^{+})$$

$$\Gamma_{86}/\Gamma_{87}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

## 1.4 ± 1.6 OUR AVERAGE

$$11.7 \pm 21.5 \pm 31.3$$

1 AAIJ

21Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$$29.2 \pm 21.4 \pm 31.2$$

1 AAIJ

21Q LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$$1.3 \pm 1.4 \pm 0.8$$

DEL-AMO-SA..10H BABR $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

1. Uses the ratio of $B^{-} \rightarrow ([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\gamma})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$ and $B^{-} \rightarrow ([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\gamma})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$, without inclusion of the photon in the reconstruction. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-averaged rate as 0.0163 ± 0.0373, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

2. Uses the ratio of $B^{+} \rightarrow ([K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D\gamma})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$ and $B^{+} \rightarrow ([K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D\gamma})_{D^{*} \pi^{-}}$, without inclusion of the photon in the reconstruction. AAIJ 21Q gives the charge-averaged rate as 0.0163 ± 0.0373, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables.

$$\Gamma([\pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{0}]_{D K^{-}})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$$\Gamma_{88}/\Gamma_{89}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

## 4.6 ±0.8 ±0.4

1 AUBERT

07B J BABR $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

## 5.5 ±1.0 ±0.7

1 AUBERT, B

05T BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07B J

1. Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma([K_{S}^{0} K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D K^{+}})/\Gamma([K_{S}^{0} K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D \pi^{+}})$$

$$\Gamma_{98}/\Gamma_{99}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.103 ±0.015 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.9.

$$0.122 \pm 0.012 \pm 0.004$$

1 ADACHI

23L BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$$0.092 \pm 0.009 \pm 0.004$$

1 AAIJ

14V LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$0.081 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.004$$

2 AAIJ

20N LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

1. The analysis uses all of $D \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} K \pi$ Dalitz decays.

2. The analysis uses $D \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} K \pi$ Dalitz decays with $K^{*-} K^{+}$ region excluded.

$$\Gamma([K_{S}^{0} K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D K^{+}})/\Gamma([K_{S}^{0} K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D \pi^{+}})$$

$$\Gamma_{91}/\Gamma_{92}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.075 ±0.013 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.7.

$$0.093 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.003$$

1 ADACHI

23L BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$$0.066 \pm 0.009 \pm 0.002$$

1 AAIJ

14V LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$0.073 \pm 0.006 \pm 0.002$$

2 AAIJ

20N LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

1. The analysis uses all of $D \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} K \pi$ Dalitz decays.

2. The analysis uses $D \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} K \pi$ Dalitz decays with $K^{*-} K^{+}$ region excluded.

$$\Gamma([K^{*}(892)^{-} K^{+}]_{D K^{+}})/\Gamma([K^{*}(892)^{-} K^{+}]_{D \pi^{+}})$$

$$\Gamma_{90}/\Gamma_{91}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.080 ±0.004 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.9.

$$0.093 \pm 0.012 \pm 0.005$$

1 ADACHI

23L BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$$0.079 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.002$$

1 AAIJ

20N LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$0.084 \pm 0.011 \pm 0.003$$

1 AAIJ

14V LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20N

1. The analysis uses $D \rightarrow K^{*}(892) K \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} K \pi$ decays.

$$\Gamma([K^{*}(892)^{+} K^{-}]_{D K^{+}})/\Gamma([K^{*}(892)^{+} K^{-}]_{D \pi^{+}})$$

$$\Gamma_{92}/\Gamma_{93}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.066 ±0.012 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.9.

$$0.103 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.006$$

1 ADACHI

23L BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$$0.062 \pm 0.006 \pm 0.003$$

1 AAIJ

20N LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$0.056 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.002$$

1 AAIJ

14V LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20N

1. The analysis uses $D \rightarrow K^{*}(892) K \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} K \pi$ decays.

$$\Gamma([K_{S}^{0} K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D \pi^{+}})/\Gamma([K_{S}^{0} K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D \pi^{+}})$$

$$\Gamma_{95}/\Gamma_{96}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.47 ±0.05 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

$$1.428 \pm 0.057 \pm 0.002$$

1 ADACHI

23L BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$$1.528 \pm 0.058 \pm 0.025$$

1 AAIJ

14V LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$0.706 \pm 0.019 \pm 0.009$$

2 AAIJ

20N LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

1. The analysis uses all of $D \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} K \pi$ Dalitz decays.

2. The analysis uses $D \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} K \pi$ Dalitz decays with $K^{*-} K^{+}$ region excluded.

$$\Gamma([K^{+} K^{-} \pi^{0}]_{D K^{+}})/\Gamma([K^{+} K^{-} \pi^{0}]_{D \pi^{+}})$$

$$\Gamma_{97}/\Gamma_{98}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

## 0.95 ±0.22 ±0.05

1 AAIJ

15W LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1. Uses $D \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \pi^{0}$ mode.

$$\Gamma([\pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{0}]_{D K^{+}})/\Gamma([\pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{0}]_{D \pi^{+}})$$

$$\Gamma_{99}/\Gamma_{100}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

## 0.98 ±0.11 ±0.05

1 AAIJ

15W LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1. Uses $D \rightarrow \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{0}$ mode.

$$\Gamma([K^{*}(892)^{-} K^{+}]_{D \pi^{+}})/\Gamma([K^{*}(892)^{+} K^{-}]_{D \pi^{+}})$$

$$\Gamma_{96}/\Gamma_{97}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.56 ±0.06 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

$$2.412 \pm 0.132 \pm 0.019$$

1 ADACHI

23L BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$$2.585 \pm 0.057 \pm 0.019$$

1 AAIJ

20N LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$2.57 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.06$$

1 AAIJ

14V LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20N

1. The analysis uses $D \rightarrow K^{*}(892) K \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} K \pi$ decays.

$$\Gamma(\bar{D}^{0} K^{*}(892)^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$$\Gamma_{101}/\Gamma_{102}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

## 5.3 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE

5.29 ±0.30 ±0.34

1 AUBERT

06Z BABR $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

6.1 ±1.6 ±1.7

1 MAHAPATRA

02 CLE2 $e^{+}e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

6.3 ±0.7 ±0.5

1 AUBERT

04Q BABR Repl. by AUBERT 06Z

1. Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
$$ \Gamma(D_{CP}(-1) K^*(892)^+) / \Gamma(D^0 K^*(892)^+) \quad \Gamma_{102/\Gamma_{101}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.515±0.135±0.065</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AJ</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.325±0.13 ± 0.04</td><td>2 AUBERT, B</td><td>05U</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AJ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. The authors report $R_{CP-} = 1.03 ± 0.27 ± 0.13$ which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio,

2. The authors report $R_{CP+} = 0.65 ± 0.26 ± 0.08$ which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio.

$$ \Gamma(D_{CP}(+1) K^*(892)^+) / \Gamma(D^0 K^*(892)^+) \quad \Gamma_{103/\Gamma_{101}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 1.16 ±0.08 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.18 ± 0.08 ± 0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18X</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.085 ± 0.175 ± 0.045</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09AJ</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.18 ± 0.08 ± 0.01</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>17B0</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 18X</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.98 ± 0.20 ± 0.055</td><td>4 AUBERT, B</td><td>05U</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AJ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Measures the ratio separately for $K^+K^-$ and $\pi^+\pi^-$ final states, $R_{KK} = 1.22 ± 0.09 ± 0.02$ and $R_{\pi\pi} = 1.08 ± 0.14 ± 0.03$, and combines the two results.

2. The authors report $R_{CP+} = 2.17 ± 0.35 ± 0.09$ which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio,

3. Measures the ratio separately for $K^+K^-$ and $\pi^+\pi^-$ final states, $R_{KK} = 1.22 ± 0.09 ± 0.01$ and $R_{\pi\pi} = 1.08 ± 0.14 ± 0.03$, and combines the two results.

4. The authors report $R_{CP+} = 1.96 ± 0.40 ± 0.11$ which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 K^*(892)^+) / \Gamma(D^0 K^*(892)^+) \quad \Gamma_{104/\Gamma_{101}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 10.2 +3.2 / 6.9 OUR EVALUATION (Produced by HFLAV)

$$ \Gamma(D^0 K^+\pi^-) / \Gamma(D^0 \pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{105/\Gamma_{111}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.4±1.3±0.9</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_{CP}(+1) K^+\pi^-\pi^+) / \Gamma([K^+\pi^-]_D K^+\pi^-\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{108/\Gamma_{106}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.040±0.064</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma([K^+\pi^-]_D K^+\pi^-\pi^-) / \Gamma([K^+\pi^-]_D K^+\pi^-\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{107/\Gamma_{106}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>85+36/33</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D^0 K^+\bar{K}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{109/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.5±1.4±0.8</td><td>1 DRUTSKOY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 K^+\bar{K}^0 (892)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{110/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.5±1.3±1.1</td><td>1 DRUTSKOY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 \pi^+\pi^-\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{111/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0055±0.0020</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 3.6.</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.0115±0.0029±0.0021</td><td>1 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)<br>1 BORTOLETT092 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$.</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D^0 \pi^+\pi^-\pi^-) / \Gamma(D^0 \pi^+) \quad \Gamma_{111/\Gamma_{54}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.2 ± 0.4</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 3.6.</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.27±0.06±0.11</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>11E</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma([K^+\pi^-]_D \pi^+\pi^-\pi^-) / \Gamma([K^+\pi^-]_D \pi^+\pi^-\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{112/\Gamma_{106}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>42.7±5.6</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D^0 \pi^+\pi^-\pi^- \text{ nonresonant}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{113/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0051±0.0034±0.0023</td><td>1 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. BORTOLETT092 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 \pi^+ \rho^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{114/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0042±0.0023±0.0020</td><td>1 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. BORTOLETT092 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 a_1(1260)^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{115/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0045±0.0019±0.0031</td><td>1 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. BORTOLETT092 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 \omega\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{116/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0041±0.0007±0.0006</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>01B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$. The signal is consistent with all observed $\omega\pi^+$ having proceeded through the $\rho^+$ resonance at mass 1349 $\pm 25^{+10}_{-5}$ MeV and width 547 $\pm 86^{+46}_{-45}$ MeV.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- \pi^+\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{117/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>1.35±0.22 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.25±0.08±0.22</td><td></td><td></td><td>1 ABE</td><td>04D</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.9 ± 0.7 ± 0.3</td><td></td><td>14</td><td>2 ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.6 ± 1.4 ± 0.7</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>3 ALBRECHT</td><td>90J</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.4 +1.7 +1.0</td><td></td><td>3</td><td>4 BEBEK</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-1.6 -0.6</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.</td><td>90</td><td>5</td><td>BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5. ± 2. ± 3.</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>87C</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2. ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)$ and absolute $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and the PDG 1992 $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+\pi^0)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$ and $B(D^0 \to K^-2\pi^+\pi^-)/B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)$.

3. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses the Mark III branching fractions for the $D$.

4. BEBEK 87 value has been updated in BERKELMAN 91 to use such assumptions as noted for BORTOLETT092.

5. BORTOLETT092 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$ and $D^*(2010)$. The authors also find the product branching fraction into $D^{**}\pi$ followed by $D^{**} \to D^*(2010)\pi$ to be $0.0014^{+0.0008}_{-0.0006}$

6. ALBRECHT 87C use PDG 86 branching ratios for $D$ and $D^*(2010)$ and assume $B(D(4S) \to B^+B^-) = 55\%$ and $B(D(4S) \to B^0\bar{B}^0) = 45\%$. Superseded by ALBRECHT 90.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- \pi^+\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{118/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.2±0.3±1.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17AR</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. The branching fraction of the normalization mode $B^+ \to D^*-\pi^+\pi^+$ is rescaled to the updated ratio of $\Upsilon(4S) \to B^+B^-$ to $\Upsilon(4S) \to B^0\bar{B}^0$ decay rates of $1.058 \pm 0.024$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- \pi^+\pi^+) / \Gamma(D^*(2010)^-\pi^+\pi^+) \quad \Gamma_{118/\Gamma_{117}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.39±0.27±0.48</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17AR</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses $D^*^- \to D^0\pi^-$ and $D^0 \to K^+\pi^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D_1(2420)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{119/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.42±0.08±1.46</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20D</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. AAIJ 20D used a 4-body amplitude analysis of $B^- \to D^+\pi^-\pi^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D_1(2420)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+) / \Gamma(D^0 \pi^+\pi^+) \quad \Gamma_{119/\Gamma_{111}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.3±1.6±0.9</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>11E</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. AAIJ 11E reports $(9.3 \pm 1.6 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}_1(2420)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+) / \Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}_1^0 \pi^+\pi^-)] \times [B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = (67.7 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(D^- \pi^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{120/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>1.07±0.05 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.08±0.03±0.05</td><td></td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AB</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.02±0.04±0.15</td><td></td><td></td><td>1 ABE</td><td>04D</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.4</td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td>BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.5 +4.1 +2.4</td><td>1</td><td>4</td><td>BEBEK</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2. ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the Mark III $B(D^+ \to K^-2\pi^+)$.

3. BORTOLETT092 assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the $D$. The product branching fraction into $D_0^*(2430) \to D\pi$ is $< 0.005$ at 90%CL and into $D_0^*(2460)$ followed by $D_0^*(2460) \to D\pi$ is $< 0.004$ at 90%CL.

4. BEBEK 87 assume the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. $B(D^- \to K^+\pi^-\pi^-) = (9.1 \pm 1.3 \pm 0.4)\%$ is assumed.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

$$ \Gamma(D^{-}K^{+}\pi^{+})/\Gamma(D^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{121}/\Gamma_{120} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.20±0.19±0.21</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15V</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_0^*(2300)^0 K^+, D_0^* \to D^{-}\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{122}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.1±1.9±1.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15V</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Performs the amplitude analysis by fitting the square-Dalitz-plot distribution.

$$ \Gamma(D_2^*(2460)^0 K^+, D_2^* \to D^{-}\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{123}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>23.2±1.1±2.0</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15V</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Performs the amplitude analysis by fitting the square-Dalitz-plot distribution.

$$ \Gamma(D_1^*(2760)^0 K^+, D_1^* \to D^{-}\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{124}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.6±0.9±0.8</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15V</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Performs the amplitude analysis by fitting the square-Dalitz-plot distribution.

$$ \Gamma(D^+ K^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{125}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>KUMAR</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.9 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10K</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>05E</td><td>BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10K</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^+ K^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma(D^- K^+ \pi^+) \qquad \Gamma_{126}/\Gamma_{121} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.3±1.2±0.7</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16M</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D^+ \eta) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{127}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>KUMAR</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_2^*(2460)^0 K^+, D_2^* \to D^{-}\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{128}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.3 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16R</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D^+ K^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{129}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.9 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16M</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

• <1.8 × 10<sup>-6</sup> 90 AAIJ 13R LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16M
• <3.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup> 90 1 DEL-AMO-SA..10K BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^+ \bar{K}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{130}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.4</td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13R</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{131}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>5.17 ±0.15 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>5.35 ±0.04 ±0.22</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21Q</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>4.82 ±0.12 ±0.35</td><td>1 KATO</td><td>18</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.52 ±0.17 ±0.42</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.3 ±0.4 ±0.1</td><td>3,4 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.34 ±0.47 ±0.18</td><td>5 BRANDENB... 98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.2 ±0.7 ±0.7</td><td>6 ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>7.2 ±1.8 ±1.6</td><td>7 BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.0 ±1.4 ±1.2</td><td>7 ALBRECHT</td><td>90J</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.664 ±0.029 ±0.268</td><td>8 AAIJ</td><td>18A</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.7 ±4.4</td><td>9 BEBEK</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

4.664 ±0.029 ±0.268 8 AAIJ 18A LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

2.7 ±4.4 9 BEBEK 87 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

¹ Measures absolute branching fractions using a missing-mass technique.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³ AUBERT,BE 06J reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 \pi^+)] = 1.14 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.04$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 \pi^+) = (4.61 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ Uses a missing-mass method. Does not depend on D branching fractions or $B^+/B^0$ production rates.

⁵ BRANDENBURG 98 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the $D^*$ reconstruction technique. The first error is their experiment's error and the second error is the systematic error from the PDG 96 value of $B(D^* \to D\pi)$.

⁶ ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0 \pi^0)$ and absolute $B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) $ and the PDG 1992 B($D^0 \to K^- \pi^+ \pi^0$)/$B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) $ and $B(D^0 \to K^- 2\pi^+ \pi^-) / B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) $.

⁷ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D and $D^*(2010)$.

⁸ Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

⁹ This is a derived branching ratio, using the inclusive pion spectrum and other two-body B decays. BEBEK 87 assume the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \omega \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{134}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0045 ±0.0010 ±0.0007</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>01B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$. The signal is consistent with all observed $\omega \pi^+$ having proceeded through the $\rho^+$ resonance at mass 1349 $\pm 25_{-5}^{+10}$ MeV and width $547 \pm 86_{-45}^{+46}$ MeV.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \rho^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{135}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.0098 ±0.0017 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.0098 ±0.0006 ±0.0017</td><td></td><td>1 CSORNA</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.010 ±0.006 ±0.004</td><td>7</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>90J</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0168 ±0.0021 ±0.0028</td><td>86</td><td>3 ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance. The second error combines the systematic and theoretical uncertainties in quadrature. CSORNA 03 includes data used in ALAM 94. A full angular fit to three complex helicity amplitudes is performed.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D and $D^*(2010)$.

³ ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0 \pi^0)$ and absolute $B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) $ and the PDG 1992 B($D^0 \to K^- \pi^+ \pi^0$)/$B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) $ and $B(D^0 \to K^- 2\pi^+ \pi^-) / B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) $ . The nonresonant $\pi^+ \pi^0$ contribution under the $\rho^+$ is negligible.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{136}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

4.19 $^{+0.31}_{-0.28}$ OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>4.21 $^{+0.30}_{-0.26}$ ±0.12</th><th>1 AUBERT</th><th>05N</th><th>BABR</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>4.0 ±1.1 ±0.1</th><th>2 ABE</th><th>01I</th><th>BELL</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</th></tr></thead></table>

¹ AUBERT 05N reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+)] = 0.0813 \pm 0.0040_{-0.0031}^{+0.0042}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+) = (5.17 \pm 0.15) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² ABE 01I reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+)] = 0.078 \pm 0.019 \pm 0.009$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+) = (5.17 \pm 0.15) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0_{CP(+1)} K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{137}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.75 ±0.29 $^{+0.21}_{-0.18}$</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BF</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AUBERT 08BF reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0_{CP(+1)} K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^+)] = 0.655 \pm 0.065 \pm 0.020$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^+) = (4.19^{+0.31}_{-0.28}) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^+) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \pi^+) \qquad \Gamma_{136}/\Gamma_{131} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.51 ±0.12 ±0.48</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>7.930 ±0.110 ±0.560</th><th>2 AAIJ</th><th>18A</th><th>LHCB</th><th>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</th></tr></thead></table>

¹ Uses semi-inclusive reconstruction of $B^+ \to ([K^+ \pi^-]_D \gamma / \pi^0)_D K^+ / \pi^+$. Decays of $D^* \to D\gamma / \pi^0$ are reconstructed without inclusion of $\pi^0$ or $\gamma$.

² Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0_{CP(+1)} K^+) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^0_{CP(+1)} \pi^+) \qquad \Gamma_{137}/\Gamma_{132} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.11 ±0.02 ±0.02</th><th>1 ABE</th><th>06</th><th>BELL</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</th></tr></thead></table>

¹ Reports a double ratio of $B(B^+ \to D^0_{CP(+1)} K^+) / B(B^+ \to D^0_{CP(+1)} \pi^+)$ and $B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 K^+) / B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 \pi^+) = 1.41 \pm 0.25 \pm 0.06$. We multiply by our best value of $B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 K^+) / B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 \pi^+) = 0.080 \pm 0.011$. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

² Uses $D^0 \to D^0 \pi^0$ with $D^0$ reconstructed in the CP-even eigenstates $K^+ K^-$ and $\pi^+ \pi^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0_{CP(-1)} K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{138}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.31 ±0.27 $^{+0.17}_{-0.16}$</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BF</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AUBERT 08BF reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0_{CP(-1)} K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^+)] = 0.55 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.02$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 K^+) = (4.19^{+0.31}_{-0.28}) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.
# Meson Particle Listings

B$^{±}$

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^*(2462)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_2^* \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{158}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 3.56±0.24 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>3.62±0.06±0.30</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>3.5±0.2±0.4</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09AB BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>3.4±0.3±0.72</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>04D BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Measured using a Dalitz plot analysis of $B^- \to D^+\pi^-\pi^-$ decays.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^*(2462)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_2^* \to D^0 \pi^- \pi^+) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{159}/\Gamma_{111} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>4.0±1.0±0.4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>11E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^*(2462)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_2^* \to D^0 \pi^- \pi^+ (\text{nonresonant})) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{160}/\Gamma_{111} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;3.0 × 10<sup>-2</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>11E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹Excludes decays where $\bar{D}_2^*(2462)^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\pi^+$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^*(2462)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_2^* \to D^*(2010)^- \pi^+) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{161}/\Gamma_{111} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>3.9±1.2±0.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>11E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹Uses $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+) = (67.7 + 0.5)\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_0^*(2400)^0 \pi^+ \times B(\bar{D}_0^*(2400)^0 \to D^- \pi^+)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{162}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 6.4±1.4 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>6.8±0.3±2.0</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AB BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>6.1±0.6±1.8</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>04D BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1(2421)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^*-\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{163}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 7.4 ±1.0 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>7.95±0.09±1.34</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>6.8±0.7±1.3</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>04D BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹AAIJ 20d used a 4-body amplitude analysis of $B^- \to D^+\pi^-\pi^-$ decays.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^*(2462)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_2^* \to D^*-\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{164}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 1.98±0.30 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>2.08±0.03±0.37</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.8±0.3±0.4</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>04D BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹AAIJ 20d used a 4-body amplitude analysis of $B^- \to D^+\pi^-\pi^-$ decays.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1^*(2427)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^*-\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{165}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 3.5 ±0.9 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>2.96±0.30±0.63</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>5.0±0.4±1.1</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>04D BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹AAIJ 20d used a 4-body amplitude analysis of $B^- \to D^+\pi^-\pi^-$ decays.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1(2420)^0 \pi^+ \times B(\bar{D}_1^* \to D^0 \pi^+ \pi^-)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{166}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.06</td><td>90</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1^*(2420)^0 \rho^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{167}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.0014</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)$ assuming $B(D_1(2420)^0 \to D^*(2010)^+\pi^-) = 67\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^*(2460)^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{168}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.0013</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.0028</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.0023</td><td>90</td><td>3 ALBRECHT</td><td>94D ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the Mark III $B(D^+ \to K^-2\pi^+)$ and $B(D_2^*(2460)^0 \to D^+\pi^-) = 30\%$.

²ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the Mark III $B(D^+ \to K^-2\pi^+)$, the CLEO II $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)$ and $B(D_2^*(2460)^0 \to D^*(2010)^+\pi^-) = 20\%$.

³ALBRECHT 94d assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the CLEO II $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)$ and $B(D_2^*(2460)^0 \to D^*(2010)^+\pi^-) = 30\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^*(2460)^0 \pi^+ \times B(\bar{D}_2^* \to D^0 \pi^+ \pi^-)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{169}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.22</td><td>90</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^*(2460)^0 \rho^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{175}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.0047</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.005</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALAM</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the Mark III $B(D^+ \to K^-2\pi^+)$ and $B(D_2^*(2460)^0 \to D^+\pi^-) = 30\%$.

²ALAM 94 assume equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and use the Mark III $B(D^+ \to K^-2\pi^+)$, the CLEO II $B(D^*(2010)^+ \to D^0\pi^+)$ and $B(D_2^*(2460)^0 \to D^*(2010)^+\pi^-) = 20\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}(2550)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}^0 \to D^*(2010)^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{156}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.72±0.01±0.14</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹AAIJ 20d used a 4-body amplitude analysis of $B^- \to D^+\pi^-\pi^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_j^*(2600)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_j^* \to D^*(2010)^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{157}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.68±0.01±0.13</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹AAIJ 20d used a 4-body amplitude analysis of $B^- \to D^+\pi^-\pi^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1^*(2680)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_1^* \to D^0 \pi^- \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{170}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.84±0.06±0.20</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹Measured using a Dalitz plot analysis of $B^+ \to D^-\pi^+\pi^+$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}(2740)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}^0 \to D^*(2010)^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{171}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.33±0.02±0.15</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹AAIJ 20d used a 4-body amplitude analysis of $B^- \to D^+\pi^-\pi^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_3^*(2750)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_3^* \to D^*(2010)^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{172}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.11±0.01±0.03</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹AAIJ 20d used a 4-body amplitude analysis of $B^- \to D^+\pi^-\pi^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_3^*(2760)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_3^* \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{173}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>1.0±0.1±0.2</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹Measured using a Dalitz plot analysis of $B^+ \to D^-\pi^+\pi^+$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^*(3000)^0 \pi^+, \bar{D}_2^* \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{174}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>2±1±1</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹Measured using a Dalitz plot analysis of $B^+ \to D^-\pi^+\pi^+$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D_S^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{176}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 9.0±0.9 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>8.6±0.2±1.1</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AP LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>9.5±2.0±0.8</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>06N BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>9.8±2.6±0.9</td><td>3 GIBAUT</td><td>96 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>14±8±1</td><td>4 ALBRECHT</td><td>92G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>13±6±1</td><td>5 BORTOLETT090</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Uses $B(B^0 \to D^-D_S^+) = (7.2 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-3}$.

²AUBERT 06n reports $(0.92 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 D_S^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.0462 \pm 0.0062$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³GIBAUT 96 reports $0.0126 \pm 0.0022 \pm 0.0025$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 D_S^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.035$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ALBRECHT 92G reports $0.024 \pm 0.012 \pm 0.004$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 D_S^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes PDG 1990 $D^0$ branching ratios, e.g., $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = 3.71 \pm 0.25\%$.

⁵BORTOLETT090 reports $0.029 \pm 0.013$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 D_S^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.02$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.
$$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D^+) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D_s^+)$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$7.25 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.09$$

DOCUMENT ID
AAIJ

TECN
23AX LHCB

COMMENT
pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

$$\Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \bar{D}^0, D_{s0}^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$0.80 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.13 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$$

$$0.80 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.02$$

1,2 CHOI

15A BELL

e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

$$0.80 \pm 0.35 \pm 0.07$$

2,3 AUBERT,B

04S BABR

e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$0.65 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.06$$

2,4 KROKOVNY

03B BELL

Repl. by CHOI 15A

1. CHOI 15A reports $(8.0 \pm 1.3)_{-1.2}^{+1.2} \pm 1.1 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \bar{D}^0, D_{s0}^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to K^+ K^- \pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to K^+ K^- \pi^-) = (5.39 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to K^+ K^- \pi^-) = (5.37 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

3. AUBERT,B 04s reports $(1.0 \pm 0.3)_{-0.2}^{+0.4} \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \bar{D}^0, D_{s0}^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

4. KROKOVNY 03b reports $(0.81 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.24) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \bar{D}^0, D_{s0}^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$\Gamma(D_{s0}(2317)^+ \bar{D}^0 \times B(D_{s0}(2317)^+ \to D_s^+ \gamma)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{178}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$<0.76$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 KROKOVNY

TECN
03B BELL

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(D_{s0}(2317)^+ \bar{D}^0 (2007)^0 \times B(D_{s0}(2317)^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{179}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$0.9 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.3$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 AUBERT,B

TECN
04S BABR

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{180}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$3.1 \pm 1.0 \pm 0.9 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$$

$$4.3 \pm 1.6 \pm 1.3$$

1 AUBERT

06N BABR

e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

$$4.6 \pm 1.8 \pm 1.0$$

2,3 AUBERT,B

04S BABR

e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

$$2.1 \pm 1.1 \pm 0.5$$

2,4 KROKOVNY

03B BELL

e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Uses a missing-mass method in the events that one of the B mesons is fully reconstructed.

2. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

3. AUBERT,B 04s reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0)] = (2.2 \pm 0.8)_{-0.7}^{+0.3}) \times 10^{-3}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0) = (48 \pm 11) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

4. KROKOVNY 03b reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0)] = (1.0 \pm 0.5)_{-0.4}^{+0.1}) \times 10^{-3}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0) = (48 \pm 11) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$\Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0 \times B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \gamma)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{181}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$0.46 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.11 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 AUBERT,B

TECN
04S BABR

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

$$0.48 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.04$$

1,2 AUBERT,B

04S BABR

e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

$$0.45 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.04$$

1,3 KROKOVNY

03B BELL

e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2. AUBERT,B 04s reports $(0.6 \pm 0.2)_{-0.1}^{+0.2} \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0 \times B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^+)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3. KROKOVNY 03b reports $(0.56 \pm 0.16)_{-0.15}^{+0.17} \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0 \times B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^+)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi \pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$\Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0 \times B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^+ \pi^-)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{182}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$<0.22$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 KROKOVNY

TECN
03B BELL

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0 \times B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{183}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$<0.27$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 KROKOVNY

TECN
03B BELL

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0 \times B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \gamma)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{184}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$<0.98$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 KROKOVNY

TECN
03B BELL

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0 (2007)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{185}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$12.0 \pm 3.0 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$$

$$11.2 \pm 2.6 \pm 2.0$$

1 AUBERT

06N BABR
2,3 AUBERT,B

$$16 \pm 8 \pm 4$$

1. Uses a missing-mass method in the events that one of the B mesons is fully reconstructed.

2. AUBERT,B 04s reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0 (2007)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0)] = (7.6 \pm 1.7)_{-2.4}^{+3.2} \times 10^{-3}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \pi^0) = (48 \pm 11) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \bar{D}^0 (2007)^0 \times B(D_{sJ}(2457)^+ \to D_s^+ \gamma)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{186}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$1.4 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.4$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 AUBERT,B

TECN
04S BABR

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D_{sJ}(2536)^+ \times B(D_{sJ}(2536)^+ \to D^*(2007)^0 K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{188}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$2.16 \pm 0.52 \pm 0.45$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 AUBERT

08B BABR

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$<2$$

90 AUBERT

03X BABR

Repl. by AUBERT 08B

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D_{sJ}(2536)^+ \times B(D_{sJ}(2536)^+ \to D^*(2007)^0 K^+ + D^*(2010)^0 K^0)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{187}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$3.97 \pm 0.85 \pm 0.56$$

DOCUMENT ID
1,2 AUSHEV

TECN
11 BELL

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Uses $\Gamma(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0 \pi^0) / \Gamma(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0 \gamma) = 1.74 \pm 0.13$ and $\Gamma(D_{sJ}(2536)^+ \to D^*(2007)^0 K^+) / \Gamma(D_{sJ}(2536)^+ \to D^*(2010)^0 K^0) = 1.36 \pm 0.2$.

2. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_{sJ}(2536)^+ \times B(D_{sJ}(2536)^+ \to D^* K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{189}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

COMMENT
5.46 \pm 1.17 \pm 1.04

DOCUMENT ID
1 AUBERT

TECN
08B BABR

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$<7$$

90 AUBERT

03X BABR

Repl. by AUBERT 08B

$$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D_{sJ}(2536)^+ \times B(D_{sJ}(2536)^+ \to D^* K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{190}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$2.30 \pm 0.98 \pm 0.43$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 AUBERT

TECN
08B BABR

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D_{sJ}(2700)^+ \times B(D_{sJ}(2700)^+ \to D^0 K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{191}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$5.6 \pm 1.8 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 AUBERT,B

TECN
04S BABR

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

$$5.02 \pm 0.71 \pm 0.93$$

1 LEES
15C BABR

1 BRODZICKA
08 BABR

e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D_{sJ}(2536)^+ + D_s^+ \to D^* K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{192}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$3.92 \pm 2.46 \pm 0.83$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 AUBERT

TECN
08B BABR

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D_{sJ}(2573)^+ + D_s^+ \to D^0 K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{193}/\Gamma$$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$0.08 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.05$$

DOCUMENT ID
1 LEES

TECN
15C BABR

COMMENT
e⁺e⁻ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
# Meson Particle Listings

$B^{\pm}$

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D_{sJ}(2573), D_{sJ}^+ \to D^0 K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{194}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2</td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_{sJ}(2573), D_{sJ}^+ \to D^0 K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{195}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5</td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D_s^+)^+ / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{196}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0076 ± 0.0016</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0079 ± 0.0017 ± 0.0007</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06N BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.0068 ± 0.0025 ± 0.0006</td><td>2</td><td>GIBAUT</td><td>96 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.010 ± 0.007 ± 0.001</td><td>3</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>92G ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. AUBERT 06N reports $(0.77 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.13) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 D_s^+)^+ / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.0462 \pm 0.0062$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2. GIBAUT 96 reports $0.0087 \pm 0.0027 \pm 0.0017$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 D_s^+)^+ / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.035$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3. ALBRECHT 92G reports $0.016 \pm 0.012 \pm 0.003$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 D_s^+)^+ / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes PDG 1990 $D^0$ branching ratios, e.g., $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = 3.71 \pm 0.25\%$ and $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0) = 55 \pm 6\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+, \bar{D}^0 \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma(D^- D_s^+ \pi^+) \quad \Gamma_{199}/\Gamma_{197} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>14.7 ± 1.3 ± 2.7</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23B LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{D}^0 D_s^+ \pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+ \pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{198}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0082 ± 0.0017</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0078 ± 0.0018 ± 0.0007</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06N BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.011 ± 0.004 ± 0.001</td><td>2</td><td>GIBAUT</td><td>96 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.008 ± 0.006 ± 0.001</td><td>3</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>92G ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. AUBERT 06N reports $(0.76 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.13) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.0462 \pm 0.0062$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2. GIBAUT 96 reports $0.0140 \pm 0.0043 \pm 0.0035$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.035$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3. ALBRECHT 92G reports $0.013 \pm 0.009 \pm 0.002$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes PDG 1990 $D^0$ and $D^*(2007)^0$ branching ratios, e.g., $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = 3.71 \pm 0.25\%$ and $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0) = 55 \pm 6\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+)^+ / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{200}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0171 ± 0.0024</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0167 ± 0.0019 ± 0.0015</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06N BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.024 ± 0.009 ± 0.002</td><td>2</td><td>GIBAUT</td><td>96 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.019 ± 0.010 ± 0.002</td><td>3</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>92G ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. AUBERT 06N reports $(1.62 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+)^+ / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.0462 \pm 0.0062$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2. GIBAUT 96 reports $0.0310 \pm 0.0088 \pm 0.0065$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+)^+ / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.035$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3. ALBRECHT 92G reports $0.031 \pm 0.016 \pm 0.005$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+)^+ / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes PDG 1990 $D^0$ and $D^*(2007)^0$ branching ratios, e.g., $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = 3.71 \pm 0.25\%$ and $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0) = 55 \pm 6\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^0(2460)^0 D_s^+, \bar{D}_2^0 \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma(D^- D_s^+ \pi^+) \quad \Gamma_{201}/\Gamma_{197} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>22.35 ± 0.91 ± 0.71</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23B LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{D}^0 D_s^+ \pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+ \pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1^0(2600)^0 D_s^+, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma(D^- D_s^+ \pi^+) \quad \Gamma_{202}/\Gamma_{197} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.37 ± 0.42 ± 0.62</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23B LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{D}^0 D_s^+ \pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+ \pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_3^0(2750)^0 D_s^+, \bar{D}_3^0 \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma(D^- D_s^+ \pi^+) \quad \Gamma_{203}/\Gamma_{197} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.31 ± 0.15 ± 0.17</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23B LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{D}^0 D_s^+ \pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+ \pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1^0(2760)^0 D_s^+, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma(D^- D_s^+ \pi^+) \quad \Gamma_{204}/\Gamma_{197} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.28 ± 0.26 ± 1.53</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23B LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{D}^0 D_s^+ \pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+ \pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_3^0(3000)^0 D_s^+, \bar{D}_3^0 \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma(D^- D_s^+ \pi^+) \quad \Gamma_{205}/\Gamma_{197} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.45 ± 0.16 ± 0.37</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23B LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{D}^0 D_s^+ \pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+ \pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{T}_{C5}^0(2900)^+ D^-, \bar{T}_{C5}^0 \to D_s^+ \pi^+) / \Gamma(D^- D_s^+ \pi^+) \quad \Gamma_{206}/\Gamma_{197} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.25 ± 0.67 ± 0.77</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23B LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses simultaneous fits of $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{D}^0 D_s^+ \pi^-$ and $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+ \pi^+$ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+(\cdot) + \bar{D}^0\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{207}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>(2.73 ± 0.93 ± 0.68) × 10<sup>-2</sup></td><td>1 AHMED</td><td>00B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. AHMED 00B reports their experiment's uncertainties ($\pm 0.78 \pm 0.48 \pm 0.68\%$, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty in the $D_s^-$ to $\phi\pi$ branching fraction. We combine the first two in quadrature.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D^*(2010)^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{208}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.1 ± 1.2 ± 1.2</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06A BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \frac{[\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D^*(2010)^+) + \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D^+)]}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{209}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;130</td><td>90</td><td>BARATE</td><td>98Q ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D^*(2010)^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{210}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.9 ± 0.5</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.6 ± 0.5 ± 0.4</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06A BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.57 ± 0.71 ± 0.56</td><td>2</td><td>MAJUMDER</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D^+)^+ / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{211}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.8 ± 0.4</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.85 ± 0.31 ± 0.38</td><td>1</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.8 ± 0.6 ± 0.5</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06A BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D^*(2010)^+) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D^+)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{210}/\Gamma_{211} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.271 ± 0.007 ± 0.005</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AX LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\bar{D}^0 D^+ \kappa^0)^+}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{212}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.55 ± 0.17 ± 0.13</td><td></td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;2.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^+ \bar{D}^*(2007)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{213/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>6.3&plusmn;1.4&plusmn;1.0</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2007)^0 D^+ K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{214/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>2.06&plusmn;0.38&plusmn;0.30</td><td>1</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;6.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^0 D^*(2010)^+ K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{215/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>3.81&plusmn;0.31&plusmn;0.23</td><td>1</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>5.2 &plusmn;1.0<sup>-0.9</sup></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2007)^0 D^*(2010)^+ K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{216/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>9.17&plusmn;0.83&plusmn;0.90</td><td>1</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>7.8 &plusmn;2.3<sup>-2.1</sup></td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^0 D^0 K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{217/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>1.45&plusmn;0.33</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td colspan="2">Error includes scale factor of 2.6.</td></tr><tr><td>1.31&plusmn;0.07</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.22&plusmn;0.22<sup>-0.24</sup></td><td>1</td><td>BRODZICKA</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.17&plusmn;0.21</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td>1 CHISTOV</td><td>04</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by BRODZICKA 08</td></tr><tr><td>1.9 &plusmn;0.3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2007)^0 D^+ K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{218/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>2.26&plusmn;0.16&plusmn;0.17</td><td>1</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;3.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2007)^0 D^*(2007)^+ K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{219/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>6.32&plusmn;0.19</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>4.7 &plusmn;0.7</td><td>e<sup>+</sup></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2007)^0 D^*(2007)^+ K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{220/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>11.23&plusmn;0.36&plusmn;1.26</td><td>1</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>5.3 &plusmn;1.1<sup>-1.0</sup></td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^- D^+ K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{221/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>0.22&plusmn;0.05&plusmn;0.05</td><td>1</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.90</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHISTOV</td><td>04</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(T_{CS0}^*(2870)^0 D^+, T_{CS0}^0 \rightarrow D^- K^+)/\Gamma(D^- D^+ K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{222/\Gamma_{221}} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>5.6&plusmn;1.4&plusmn;0.5</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AI</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹ Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of B⁺ → D⁻D⁺K⁺ decays.

$$ \Gamma(T_{CS1}^*(2900)^0 D^+, T_{CS1}^0 \rightarrow D^- K^+)/\Gamma(D^- D^+ K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{223/\Gamma_{221}} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>30.6&plusmn;2.4&plusmn;2.1</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AI</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹ Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of B⁺ → D⁻D⁺K⁺ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D^- D^+(2010)^+ K^+)/\Gamma(D^- D^+ K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{224/\Gamma_{221}} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>24.2&plusmn;2.2&plusmn;0.5</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AI</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹ Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of B⁺ → D⁻D⁺K⁺ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D^- D^+(2010)^+ K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{225/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>0.63&plusmn;0.09&plusmn;0.06</td><td>1</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^- D^+(2010)^+ K^+)/\Gamma(D^0 D^0 K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{225/\Gamma_{217}} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>0.517&plusmn;0.015&plusmn;0.017</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AI</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹ Uses D⁺ → K⁻π⁺π⁺, D⁰ → K⁻π⁺ and D⁰ → K⁻π⁺π⁺π⁻ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D^+(2010)^- D^+ K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{226/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>0.60&plusmn;0.10&plusmn;0.08</td><td>1</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.5 &plusmn;0.3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- D^+ K^+)/\Gamma(D^0 D^0 K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{226/\Gamma_{217}} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>0.577&plusmn;0.016&plusmn;0.018</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AI</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹ Uses D⁺ → K⁻π⁺π⁺, D⁰ → K⁻π⁺ and D⁰ → K⁻π⁺π⁺π⁻ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D^- D^+(2010)^+ K^+)/\Gamma(D^*(2010)^- D^+ K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{225/\Gamma_{226}} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>0.907&plusmn;0.033&plusmn;0.014</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AI</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹ Uses D⁺ → K⁻π⁺π⁺, D⁰ → K⁻π⁺ and D⁰ → K⁻π⁺π⁺π⁻ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^- D^*(2010)^+ K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{227/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>1.32&plusmn;0.13&plusmn;0.12</td><td>1</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;1.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma((D^+ + D^*)(D + D^*)K)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{228/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>4.05&plusmn;0.11&plusmn;0.28</td><td>1</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>3.5 &plusmn;0.3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03x</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11B</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(D_S^+ D_S^+ K^+)/\Gamma(D^- D^+ K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{229/\Gamma_{221}} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>0.525&plusmn;0.033&plusmn;0.027&plusmn;0.034</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AI</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 23AI report that the last error is due to the uncertainties on the branching fractions of the $D_S^±$ → K∓K∓π∓ and D∓ → K∓π∓π∓ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D_S^+ \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{230/\Gamma} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>1.6&plusmn;0.6<sup>-0.5</sup>&plusmn;0.1</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07M</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;16</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALEXANDER 93B</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ AUBERT 07M reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \rightarrow D_S^+ \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \rightarrow \phi\pi^+)] = (7.0 \times 2.4 + 0.6) \times 10^{-7}$ which we divide by our best value $B(D_S^+ \rightarrow \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 2.0 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \rightarrow D_S^+ \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_S^+ \rightarrow \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ \rightarrow \phi\pi^+) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ \rightarrow \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.
# Meson Particle Listings

$B^{\pm}$

$$ \frac{[\Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^0) + \Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^0)]}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad (\Gamma_{230} + \Gamma_{231})/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 0.9 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \pi^{0}) + \Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \pi^{0})]/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{231}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.6 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 3.2 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \eta)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{232}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>KUMAR</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

• <4 × 10<sup>-4</sup> 90 1 ALEXANDER 93B CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

1. ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 4.6 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \eta)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{233}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>KUMAR</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

• <6 × 10<sup>-4</sup> 90 1 ALEXANDER 93B CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

1. ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 7.5 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \rho^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{234}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.0 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 3.7 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{[\Gamma(D_s^+ \rho^0) + \Gamma(D_s^+ \bar{K}^*(892^0))]}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad (\Gamma_{234} + \Gamma_{245})/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 3.4 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \rho^0) + \Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \bar{K}^*(892^0))]/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \rho^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{235}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 4.8 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{[\Gamma(D_s^+ \rho^0) + \Gamma(D_s^+ \bar{K}^*(892^0))]}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad (\Gamma_{235} + \Gamma_{247})/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 2.0 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \rho^0) + \Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \bar{K}^*(892^0))]/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \omega)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{236}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

• <2.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup> 90 2 ALBRECHT 93E ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

1. ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 4.8 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \omega)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

2. ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 3.4 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \omega)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \omega)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{237}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

• <1.1 × 10<sup>-3</sup> 90 2 ALBRECHT 93E ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

1. ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 6.8 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \omega)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

2. ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 1.9 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \omega)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ a_1(1260)^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{238}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.8 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 3.0 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} a_1(1260)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ a_1(1260)^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{239}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 2.2 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} a_1(1260)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ K^+ K^-)}{\Gamma_{D^0 D_s^+}} \quad \Gamma_{240}/\Gamma_{176} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.0 ± 0.9 ± 0.1</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. AAIJ 18B reports $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} K^{+} K^{-})/\Gamma(B^{+} \to D^{0} D_{S}^{+})] / [B(D^{0} \to K^{+} K^{-})] = 0.197 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.017$ which we multiply by our best value $B(D^{0} \to K^{+} K^{-}) = (4.08 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \phi)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{241}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 0.42</td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

• 1.7 $+1.1/ -0.7 \pm 0.2$ 90 2 AAIJ 13R LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 18B

• <1.9 90 3 AUBERT 06F BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

• <1000 90 4 ALBRECHT 93E ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

• <260 90 5 ALEXANDER 93B CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

1. AAIJ 18B uses $B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} D^{0}$ decays for normalization.

2. AAIJ 13R reports $(1.87^{+1.25}_{-0.73} \pm 0.19 \pm 0.32) \times 10^{-6}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^{+} \to D^{0} D_{S}^{+})]$ assuming $B(B^{+} \to D^{0} D_{S}^{+}) = (10.0 \pm 1.7) \times 10^{-3}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(B^{+} \to D^{0} D_{S}^{+}) = (9.0 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3. Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

4. ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 1.7 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

5. ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 3.1 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \phi)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{242}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>06F</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

• <1.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup> 90 2 ALBRECHT 93E ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

• <3.5 × 10<sup>-4</sup> 90 3 ALEXANDER 93B CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

1. Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2. ALBRECHT 93E reports $< 2.1 \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

3. ALEXANDER 93B reports $< 4.2 \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to D_{S}^{+} \phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 0.037$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_{S}^{+} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = 4.5 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(D_s^+ \bar{K}^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{243}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>KUMAR</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;1.5 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;8 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 ALBRECHT 93E reports < 2.5 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → D_s⁺K⁺)/Γ_total] × [B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

2 ALEXANDER 93B reports < 10.3 × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → D_s⁺K⁺)/Γ_total] × [B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

<table><tr><td>Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>KUMAR</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;1.9 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;9 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 ALBRECHT 93E reports < 3.1 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → D_s⁺K⁺)/Γ_total] × [B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

2 ALEXANDER 93B reports < 10.9 × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → D_s⁺K⁺)/Γ_total] × [B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

<table><tr><td>Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13R</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;4 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 ALEXANDER 93B reports < 4.4 × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → D_s⁺K⁺(892⁰)/Γ_total] × [B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

<table><tr><td>Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.5</td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13R</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.5 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>93B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 ALEXANDER 93B reports < 4.3 × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → D_s⁺K⁺(892⁰)/Γ_total] × [B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

<table><tr><td>Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>1.80±0.22 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.71±0.08±0.25</td><td>1 WIECHCZYNY...09</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>2.02±0.13±0.38</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08G BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;7</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

2 ALBRECHT 93E reports < 1.1 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → D_s⁻π⁺K⁺)/Γ_total] × [B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

<table><tr><td>Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>1.45±0.24 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.31<sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.12</sub>±0.28</td><td>1 WIECHCZYNY...09</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.67±0.16±0.35</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08G BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;10</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

2 ALBRECHT 93E reports < 1.6 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → D_s⁻π⁺K⁺)/Γ_total] × [B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

<table><tr><td>Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 ALBRECHT 93E reports < 8.6 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → D_s⁻π⁺K<sup>+</sup>(892⁰)/Γ_total] × [B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

<table><tr><td>Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>(892⁰))/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;7 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 ALBRECHT 93E reports < 1.1 × 10⁻² from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → D_s⁻π⁺K<sup>+</sup>(892⁰))/Γ_total] × [B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺)] assuming B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s⁺ → φπ⁺) = 4.5 × 10⁻².

<table><tr><td>Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>0.97±0.21 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.93±0.22±0.10</td><td>1 WIECHCZYNY...15</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.1±0.4±0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08G BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

<table><tr><td>Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>0.054±0.013±0.006</td><td></td><td>WIECHCZYNY...15</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ(D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.15</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08G BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

<table><tr><td>Γ(η<sub>C</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>1.10±0.07 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

1.11±0.12 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4.

<table><tr><td>0.96±0.12±0.06±0.03</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>20C BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.20±0.08±0.07</td><td>1 KATO</td><td>18</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.08<sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.12</sub>±0.13</td><td>3 CHILIKIN</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.87±0.15</td><td>1,4 AUBERT</td><td>06E BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 20c</td></tr><tr><td>1.35<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.21</sub>±0.11</td><td>5 AUBERT,B</td><td>05L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.04±0.12±0.06</td><td>4,6 AUBERT,B</td><td>04B BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.25±0.14<sup>+0.39</sup><sub>-0.40</sub></td><td>7 FANG</td><td>03</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.69<sup>+0.26</sup><sub>-0.21</sub>±0.22</td><td>8 EDWARDS</td><td>01</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 Measures absolute branching fractions using a missing-mass technique.

2 LEES 20c measurement's last uncertainty is due to the used B(B⁺ → K∓J/ψ) value.

3 CHILIKIN 19 reports [Γ(B⁺ → η<sub>C</sub>K⁺)/Γ_total] × [B(η<sub>C</sub>(1S) → pπ<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)] = (39.4<sup>+4.1</sup><sub>-3.9</sub> × 10⁻⁷ which we divide by our best value B(η<sub>C</sub>(1S) → pπ<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>) = (3.7 ± 0.5) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

4 The ratio of B(B⁺ → K∓η<sub>C</sub>) B(η<sub>C</sub> → K∓Kπ) = (7.4 ± 0.5 ± 0.7) × 10⁻⁵ reported in AUBERT,B 04B and B(B⁺ → K∓±η<sub>C</sub>) = (8.7 ± 1.5) × 10⁻³ reported in AUBERT 06E contribute to the determination of B(η<sub>C</sub> → K∓Kπ), which is used by others for normalization.

5 AUBERT,B 05L reports [Γ(B⁺ → η<sub>C</sub>K⁺)/Γ_total] × [B(η<sub>C</sub>(1S) → pπ<sup>-</sup>)] = (1.8<sup>+0.3</sup><sub>-0.2</sub> × 10⁻⁶ which we divide by our best value B(η<sub>C</sub>(1S) → pπ<sup>-</sup>) = (1.33 ± 0.11) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error from using our best value.

6 AUBERT,B 04B reports [Γ(B⁺ → η<sub>C</sub>K⁺)/Γ_total] × [B(η<sub>C</sub>(1S) → K∓Kπ)] = (0.074 ± 0.005 ± 0.007) × 10⁻³ which we divide by our best value B(η<sub>C</sub>(1S) → K∓Kπ) = (7.1 ± 0.4) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

7 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

8 EDWARDS 01 assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at the T(45). The correlated uncertainties (28.3)% from B(J/ψ(1S) → γη<sub>C</sub>) in those modes have been accounted for.

<table><tr><td>Γ(B<sup>+</sup> → η<sub>C</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub> × Γ(η<sub>C</sub>(1S) → γγ)/Γ<sub>η<sub>C</sub>(1S)</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>0.22<sup>+0.09</sup><sub>-0.07</sub>±0.04</td><td>1 WICHT</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

<table><tr><td>Γ(η<sub>C</sub>K<sup>+</sup>(892⁰))/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>1.2<sup>+0.5</sup><sub>-0.4</sub>±0.1</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>07A BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 AUBERT 07A reports [Γ(B⁺ → η<sub>C</sub>K<sup>+</sup>(892⁰))/Γ_total] × [B(η<sub>C</sub>(1S) → pπ<sup>-</sup>)] = (1.57<sup>+0.56</sup><sub>-0.46</sub> × 10⁻⁶ which we divide by our best value B(η<sub>C</sub>(1S) → pπ<sup>-</sup>) = (1.33 ± 0.11) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

<table><tr><td>Γ(η<sub>C</sub>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.9 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>VINOKUROVA</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

$\Gamma(\eta_c K^+ \omega(782))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.3 x 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{257}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VINOKUROVA 15</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(\eta_c K^+ \eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.2 x 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{258}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VINOKUROVA 15</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(\eta_c K^+ \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.2 x 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{259}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VINOKUROVA 15</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(\eta_c(2S) K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{260}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

### 4.4±1.0 OUR AVERAGE

3.5±1.7±0.5±0.1

1,2 LEES 20c BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

4.8±1.1±0.3

2 KATO 18 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

3.4±1.8±0.3

2 AUBERT 06e BABR Repl. by LEES 20c

1 LEES 20c measurement's last uncertainty is due to the used B(B<sup>±</sup> → K<sup>±</sup>J/ψ) value.

2 Measures absolute branching fractions using a missing-mass technique.

$\Gamma(\eta_c(2S) K^+, \eta_c \to p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.47±0.72±0.26</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{261}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17AD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<10.6

95 2 AAIJ 13s LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 17AD

1 Measured relative to B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>+</sup> decay with charmonia reconstructed in pπ<sup>-</sup> final state and using B(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>+</sup>) × B(J/ψ → pπ<sup>-</sup>) = (2.17 ± 0.08) × 10<sup>-6</sup>. The last uncertainty includes the uncertainty of B(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>+</sup>) × B(J/ψ → pπ<sup>-</sup>).

2 Measured relative to B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>+</sup> decay with charmonia reconstructed in pπ<sup>-</sup> final state and using B(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>+</sup>) = (1.013 ± 0.034) × 10<sup>-3</sup> and B(J/ψ → pπ<sup>-</sup>) = (2.17 ± 0.07) × 10<sup>-3</sup>.

$\Gamma(\eta_c(2S) K^+, \eta_c \to p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.2<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-1.6</sub>±0.5</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{263}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CHILIKIN</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(B^+ \to h_c(1P) K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times \Gamma(h_c(1P) \to \gamma\eta_c(1S))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.48</td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses the production ratio of $(B^+B^-)/(B^0B^0) = 1.026 \pm 0.032$ at $\Upsilon(45)$.

$\Gamma(B^+ \to \eta_c(2S) K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times \Gamma(\eta_c(2S) \to \gamma\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.18</td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B<sup>+</sup> and B<sup>0</sup> at the $\Upsilon(45)$.

$\Gamma(\eta_c(2S) K^+, \eta_c \to K_5^0 K^\mp \pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.4<sup>+2.2</sup><sub>-1.5</sub>±0.5</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{262}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1,2 VINOKUROVA 11</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B<sup>0</sup> and B<sup>+</sup> from Upsilon(4S) decays.

2 The first uncertainty includes both statistical and interference effects while the second is due to systematics.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{295}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

### 10.20 ± 0.19 OUR FIT

### 10.18 ± 0.20 OUR AVERAGE

10.32 ± 0.07 ± 0.24

1 CHAUDHURY 21 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

9.4 ± 0.7 ± 0.8

2 CHILIKIN 19 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

8.9 ± 0.6 ± 0.5

3 KATO 18 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

8.1 ± 1.3 ± 0.7

3 AUBERT 06e BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

10.61 ± 0.15 ± 0.48

4 AUBERT 05J BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

10.4 ± 1.1 ± 0.1

5 AUBERT, B 05L BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

10.2 ± 0.8 ± 0.7

4 JESSOP 97 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

9.24 ± 3.04 ± 0.05

6 BORTOLETTO 92 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

8.09 ± 3.50 ± 0.04

7 ALBRECHT 90J ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

10.1 ± 0.2 ± 0.7

4 ABE 03b BELL Repl. by CHAUDHURY 21

10.1 ± 0.3 ± 0.5

4 AUBERT 02 BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05J

11.0 ± 1.5 ± 0.9

4 ALAM 94 CLE2 Repl. by JESSOP 97

22 ± 10 ± 2

BUSKULIC 92g ALEP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z

7 ± 4

8 ALBRECHT 87d ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

10 ± 7 ± 2

9 BEBEK 87 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

9 ± 5

10 ALAM 86 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

1 CHAUDHURY 21 uses the relative production fraction of charged ($\Upsilon^{+ -}$) to neutral ($\Upsilon^{00}$) B mesons at $\Upsilon(4S)$ value of $f^{+ -}/f^{00} = 1.058 \pm 0.024$.

2 CHILIKIN 19 reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-)] = (56.4(3.3+2.7) \times 10^{-7}$ which we divide by our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-) = (6.0 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3 Measures absolute branching fractions using a missing-mass technique.

4 Assumes equal production of B<sup>+</sup> and B<sup>0</sup> at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

5 AUBERT, B 05L reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] = (2.2 \pm 0.2 \pm 0.1) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

6 BORTOLETTO 92 reports $(8 \pm 2 \pm 2) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)]$ assuming $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = 0.069 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.971 \pm 0.032) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B<sup>+</sup> and B<sup>0</sup> at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

7 ALBRECHT 90J reports $(7 \pm 3 \pm 1) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)]$ assuming $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = 0.069 \pm 0.009$, which we rescale to our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.971 \pm 0.032) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B<sup>+</sup> and B<sup>0</sup> at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

8 ALBRECHT 87d assume $B^+B^-/B^0B^0$ ratio is 55/45. Superseded by ALBRECHT 90J.

9 BEBEK 87 value has been updated in BERKELMAN 91 to use same assumptions as noted for BORTOLETTO 92.

10 ALAM 86 assumes $B^\pm/B^0$ ratio is 60/40.

$\Gamma(\eta_c K^+)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.94 ± 0.10 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.92 ± 0.07 ± 0.08</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13s LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.33 ± 0.10 ± 0.43</td><td></td><td>2 AUBERT, B</td><td>04b BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 13s reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \eta_c K^+) / \Gamma(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+)] \times [B(\eta_c(1S) \to p\bar{p}) / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] = 0.578 \pm 0.035 \pm 0.026$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\eta_c(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (1.33 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

2 Uses BABAR measurement of $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (10.1 \pm 0.3 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-4}$.

$\Gamma(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \to \gamma\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.16</td><td>90</td><td>1 WICHT</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B<sup>+</sup> and B<sup>0</sup> at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^+ \pi^+ \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.716 ± 0.010 ± 0.060</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.16 ± 0.07 ± 0.09</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.69 ± 0.18 ± 0.12</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.39 ± 0.81 ± 0.01</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.39 ± 0.91 ± 0.01</td><td></td><td>6</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1.8 90 5 ALBRECHT 90J ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

### WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.81±0.13 (Confidence Level = 0.0023)

<figure><img src="image_581.png" /></figure>

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^+ \pi^+ \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ (units $10^{-3}$)

1 Assumes equal production of B<sup>+</sup> and B<sup>0</sup> at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
²ACOSTA 02F uses as reference of B(B → J/ψ(1S) K$^{+}$) = (10.1 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁴. The second error includes the systematic error and the uncertainties of the branching ratio.

³BORTOLETTO 92 reports (1.2 ± 0.6 ± 0.4) × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → J/ψ(1S) K⁺π⁺π⁻) / Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻)] assuming B(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻) = 0.069 ± 0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻) = (5.971 ± 0.032) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

⁴ALBRECHT 87D reports (1.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → J/ψ(1S) K⁺π⁺π⁻) / Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻)] assuming B(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻) = 0.069 ± 0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻) = (5.971 ± 0.032) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. They actually report 0.0011 ± 0.0007 assuming B⁺B⁻/B⁰B⁰ ratio is 55/45. We rescale to 50/50. Analysis explicitly removes B⁺ → ψ(2S) K⁺.

⁵ALBRECHT 90 reports < 1.6 × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁺ → J/ψ(1S) K⁺π⁺π⁻) / Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻)] assuming B(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻) = 0.069, which we rescale to our best value B(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻) = 5.971 × 10⁻². Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^+K^-K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{298}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>33.7 ± 2.5 ± 1.4</td><td>LEES</td><td>15</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(h_c(1P)K^+, h_c \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{264}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><4.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05R</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(X(3730)^0 K^+, X^0 \to \eta_c \eta) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{265}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><4.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>VINOKUROVA 15</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(X(3730)^0 K^+, X^0 \to \eta_c \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{266}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><5.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>VINOKUROVA 15</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\eta_{c2}(1D)K^+, \eta_{c2} \to h_c \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{267}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><3.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>CHILIKIN</td><td>20</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\eta_{c2}(1D)\pi^+ K_5^0, \eta_{c2} \to h_c \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{268}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><1.1 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>CHILIKIN</td><td>20</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\psi(3823)K^+, \psi_2 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{269}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.82 ± 0.54 ± 0.13</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20S</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The first error is statistic; the second error is the total systematic error.

$$ \Gamma(\psi_2(3823)K^+, \psi_2 \to J/\psi\eta) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{270}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.25<sup>+0.71</sup><sub>-0.53</sub> ± 0.04</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22D</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\psi_3(3842)K^+, \psi_3 \to J/\psi\eta) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{271}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><6.1 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22D</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{272}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.3 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.9<sup>+0.7</sup><sub>-0.6</sub> ± 1.0</td><td>1 HIRATA</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.9 ± 0.8<sup>+0.7</sup><sub>-0.8</sub></td><td>4,5 AUBERT</td><td>06</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08Y</td></tr><tr><td><3.2</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>06E</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.6 ± 1.2<sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-1.0</sub></td><td>4,6 AUBERT</td><td>05R</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 06</td></tr><tr><td>3.9 ± 0.9 ± 1.0</td><td>7 CHOI</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHOI 11</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><2.6</td><td>90</td><td>2 KATO</td><td>18</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><2.9 ± 0.8<sup>+0.7</sup><sub>-0.8</sub></td><td>4,5 AUBERT</td><td>06</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08Y</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><3.2</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>06E</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.6 ± 1.2<sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-1.0</sub></td><td>4,6 AUBERT</td><td>05R</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 06</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.9 ± 0.9 ± 1.0</td><td>7 CHOI</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHOI 11</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹HIRATA 23 reports [Γ(B⁺ → χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) K⁺) / Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → D<sup>*0</sup> D<sup>0</sup>)] = (0.97<sup>+0.21</sup><sub>-0.18</sub> ± 0.10) × 10⁻⁴ which we divide by our best value B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → D<sup>*0</sup> D<sup>0</sup>) = (34 ± 12) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Measures absolute branching fractions using a missing-mass technique.

³LEES 20C measurement's last error is due to the used B(B± → K± J/ψ) value.

⁴Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

⁵AUBERT 06 reports [Γ(B⁺ → χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) K⁺) / Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → π⁺π⁻ J/ψ(1S))] = (10.1 ± 2.5 ± 1.0) × 10⁻⁶ which we divide by our best value

B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → π⁺π⁻ J/ψ(1S)) = (3.5 ± 0.9) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁶AUBERT 05R reports [Γ(B⁺ → χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) K⁺) / Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → π⁺π⁻ J/ψ(1S))] = (12.8 ± 4.1) × 10⁻⁶ which we divide by our best value B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → π⁺π⁻ J/ψ(1S)) = (3.5 ± 0.9) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁷CHOI 03 reports [Γ(B⁺ → χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) K⁺) / Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → π⁺π⁻ J/ψ(1S))] = (13.6 ± 3.0 ± 0.5) × 10⁻⁶ which we divide by our best value B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → π⁺π⁻ J/ψ(1S)) = (3.5 ± 0.9) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3915)K^+, \chi_{c0} \to D^+D^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{273}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><2.8 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 KATO</td><td>18</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measures absolute branching fractions using a missing-mass technique.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3915)K^+, \chi_{c0} \to D^+D^-) / \Gamma(D^-D^+K^+) \quad \Gamma_{274}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.7 ± 0.9 ± 0.2</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20AI</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of B⁺ → D⁻D⁺K⁺ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3915)K^+, \chi_{c0} \to \eta_c \eta) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{275}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><4.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 VINOKUROVA 15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Upper limit is corrected in the Erratum.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3915)K^+, \chi_{c0} \to \eta_c \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{276}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><1.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 VINOKUROVA 15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Upper limit is corrected in the Erratum.

$$ \Gamma(\chi(4014)^0 K^+, X^0 \to \eta_c \eta) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{277}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><3.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>VINOKUROVA 15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\chi(4014)^0 K^+, X^0 \to \eta_c \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{278}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><1.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>VINOKUROVA 15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(T_{c\bar{c}1}(3900)^0 K^+, T_{c\bar{c}1}^0 \to \eta_c \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{279}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><4.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>VINOKUROVA 15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(T_{c\bar{c}1}(3900)^0 K^+, T_{c\bar{c}1}^0 \to J/\psi\eta) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{280}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><4.3 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22D</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(T_{c\bar{c}0}(4020)^0 K^+, T_{c\bar{c}0}^0 \to \eta_c \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{281}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><1.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>VINOKUROVA 15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)K^*(892)^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{282}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><6 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>09B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2,3 AUBERT</td><td>09B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT 09B reports [Γ(B⁺ → χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) K⁺(892)⁺) / Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → γJ/ψ)] < 4.8 × 10⁻⁶ which we divide by our best value B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → γJ/ψ) = 7.8 × 10⁻³.

²Uses B(T(4S) → B⁺B⁻) = (51.6 ± 0.6)% and B(T(4S) → B⁰B⁰) = (48.4 ± 0.6)%.

³AUBERT 09B reports [Γ(B⁺ → χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) K⁺(892)⁺) / Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → γψ(2S))] < 28 × 10⁻⁶ which we divide by our best value B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → γψ(2S)) = 0 × 10⁻².

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)K^0, \chi_{c1}^+ \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{283}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><6.1</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 CHOI</td><td>11</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><22</td><td>90</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>05B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes π⁺π⁰ originates from ρ⁺.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S). The isovector-X hypothesis is excluded with a likelihood test at 1 × 10⁻⁴ level.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)K^0\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{284}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.0 ± 0.9 ± 0.8</td><td>1 BALA</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BALA 15 reports [Γ(B⁺ → χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) K⁰π⁺) / Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → π⁺π⁻ J/ψ(1S))] = (10.6 ± 3.0 ± 0.9) × 10⁻⁶ which we divide by our best value B(χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) → π⁺π⁻ J/ψ(1S)) = (3.5 ± 0.9) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.
# Meson Particle Listings

B$^{±}$

$$ \Gamma(T_{c\bar{c}1}(4430)^{+} K^{0}, T_{c\bar{c}1}^{+} \to J/\psi\pi^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{285}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;1.5</b></td><td>95</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(T_{c\bar{c}1}(4430)^{+} K^{0}, T_{c\bar{c}1}^{+} \to \psi(2S)\pi^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{286}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;4.7</b></td><td>95</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(T_{c\bar{c}1}(4430)^{0} K^{+}, T_{c\bar{c}1}^{0} \to J/\psi\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{287}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;12.7 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></b></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4230)^{0} K^{+}, \psi^{0} \to J/\psi\pi^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{288}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;15.6</b></td><td>95</td><td>1,2 GARG</td><td>19 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<29 95 2 AUBERT 06 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

¹Corresponds to a 90% CL upper limit of < 14 × 10<sup>-6</sup>.

²Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4230) K^{+}, \psi \to J/\psi\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{289}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;3.9 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></b></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4360) K^{+}, \psi \to J/\psi\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{290}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;12.4 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></b></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4390) K^{+}, \psi \to J/\psi\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{291}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;24.1 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></b></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3915) K^{+}, \chi_{c0} \to J/\psi\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{292}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;14</b></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06M BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3915) K^{+}, \chi_{c0} \to \chi_{c1}(1P)\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{293}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;3.8 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></b></td><td>90</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>19 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(X(3930)^{0} K^{+}, X^{0} \to J/\psi\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{294}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;2.5</b></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06M BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^{0} \pi^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{296}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.01 ± 0.021 1 AUBERT, BE 09AA BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

¹Does not report systematic uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^{*}(892)^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{300}/\Gamma $$

For polarization information see the Listings at the end of the “B$^{0}$ Branching Ratios” section.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.43 ± 0.08 OUR FIT

1.43 ± 0.08 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.78</td><td>+0.36<br>-0.32</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>07AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.454 ± 0.047 ± 0.097</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.28</td><td>± 0.07</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>02N BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.41</td><td>± 0.23</td><td>2 JESSOP</td><td>97 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.58</td><td>± 0.47</td><td>3 ABE</td><td>96H CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.50</td><td>± 1.08</td><td>4 BORTOLETTO</td><td>90J ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.85</td><td>± 1.30</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>90J ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.37 ± 0.09 ± 0.11 2 AUBERT 02 BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05J

1.78 ± 0.51 ± 0.23 13 2 ALAM 94 CLE2 Sup. by JESSOP 97

¹AUBERT 07AV reports [Γ(B$^{+}$ → J/ψ(1S) K*(892$^{+}$)) / Γ$_{total}$] × [B(J/ψ(1S) → p̄p)] = (3.78 + 0.72 + 0.28) × 10<sup>-6</sup> which we divide by our best value B(J/ψ(1S) → p̄p) = (2.120 ± 0.029) × 10<sup>-3</sup>. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

³ABE 96H assumes that B(B$^{+}$ → J/ψK$^{+}$) = (1.02 ± 0.14) × 10<sup>-3</sup>.

⁴BORTOLETTO 92 reports (1.3 ± 0.9 ± 0.3) × 10<sup>-3</sup> from a measurement of [Γ(B$^{+}$ → J/ψ(1S) K$^{+}$ (892$^{+}$)) / Γ$_{total}$] × [B(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)] assuming B(J/ψ(1S) →

e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>) = 0.069 ± 0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>) = (5.971 ± 0.032) × 10<sup>-2</sup>. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

⁵ALBRECHT 90J reports (1.6 ± 1.1 ± 0.3) × 10<sup>-3</sup> from a measurement of [Γ(B$^{+}$ → J/ψ(1S) K*(892$^{+}$)) / Γ$_{total}$] × [B(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)] assuming B(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>) = 0.069 ± 0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>) = (5.971 ± 0.032) × 10<sup>-2</sup>. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^{*}(892)^{+})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{300}/\Gamma_{295} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>1.39 ± 0.09</th><th>OUR AVERAGE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.37 ± 0.05 ± 0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>05J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>1.45 ± 0.20 ± 0.17</th><th>1 JESSOP</th><th>01L BELL</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.92 ± 0.60 ± 0.17</td><td>ABE</td><td>96Q CDF</td><td>p̄p̄</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.37 ± 0.10 ± 0.08 2 AUBERT 02 BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05J

¹JESSOP 97 assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S). The measurement is actually measured as an average over kaon charged and neutral states.

²Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K(1270)^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{301}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>1.80 ± 0.34 ± 0.39</b></td><td>1 ABE</td><td>01L BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses the PDG value of B(B$^{+}$ → J/ψ(1S) K$^{+}$) = (1.00 ± 0.10) × 10<sup>-3</sup>.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K(1400)^{+})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K(1270)^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{302}/\Gamma_{301} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;0.30</b></td><td>90</td><td>ABE</td><td>01L BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{303}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>12.4 ± 1.4</th><th>OUR AVERAGE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>12.7 ± 1.1 ± 1.1</td><td>1 IWASHITA</td><td>14 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>10.8 ± 2.3 ± 2.4</th><th>1 AUBERT</th><th>04Y BABR</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 Assumes equal production of B<sup>+</sup> and B<sup>0</sup> at the T(4S).</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}-\text{odd}(3872) K^{+}, \chi_{c1}-\text{odd} \to J/\psi\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{304}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;3.8 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></b></td><td>90</td><td>IWASHITA</td><td>14 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4160) K^{+}, \psi \to J/\psi\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{305}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>&lt;8.7 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></b></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<7.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup> 90 IWASHITA 14 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta' K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{306}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<8.8 90 1 XIE 07 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

¹Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta' K^{+})/\Gamma(\psi(2S) K^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{306}/\Gamma_{330} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>4.91 ± 0.47 ± 0.30</b></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AK LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 23AK measurements last uncertainty includes ±0.07 uncertainties on the branching fractions of the intermediate resonances.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{307}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>5.00 ± 0.37 ± 0.15</th><th>LEES</th><th>15 BABR</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.4 ± 1.4 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03O BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>8.8 ± 3.5<br>-3.0</th><th>2 ANASTASSOV</th><th>00 CLE2</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 Assumes equal production of B<sup>+</sup> and B<sup>0</sup> at the T(4S).</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

²ANASTASSOV 00 finds 10 events on a background of 0.5 ± 0.2. Assumes equal production of B$^{0}$ and B$^{+}$ at the T(4S), a uniform Dalitz plot distribution, isotropic J/ψ(1S) and φ decays, and B(B$^{+}$ → J/ψ(1S)φK$^{+}$) = B(B$^{0}$ → J/ψ(1S)φK$^{0}$).

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K_1(1650), K_1 \to \phi K^{+})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{308}/\Gamma_{307} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.12 ± 0.10 ± 0.17</b></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in amplitude analysis of B$^{+}$ → J/ψ(1S)φK$^{+}$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^{*}(1680)^{+}, K^{*} \to \phi K^{+})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi K^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{309}/\Gamma_{307} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>6.7 ± 1.9 ± 3.2</b></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in amplitude analysis of B$^{+}$ → J/ψ(1S)φK$^{+}$.
$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K_2^*(1980), K_2^* \to \phi K^+) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+) \quad \Gamma_{310/\Gamma_{307}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.9 ± 0.8 ± 1.7<sup>+0.7</sup><sub>-0.7</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in amplitude analysis of $B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K(1830)^+, K(1830)^+ \to \phi K^+) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+) \quad \Gamma_{311/\Gamma_{307}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.6 ± 1.1 ± 2.3<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-1.8</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in amplitude analysis of $B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(4140)K^+, \chi_{c1} \to J/\psi(1S)\phi) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+) \quad \Gamma_{312/\Gamma_{307}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.19 ± 0.08</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.13</td><td>± 0.032<sup>+4.8</sup><sub>-2.0</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.19</td><td>± 0.07</td><td>± 0.04</td><td>2 ABAZOV</td><td>14A D0 p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.133</td><td>90</td><td>LEES</td><td>15</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.07</td><td>90</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>12AA LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in amplitude analysis of $B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+$.

²Reported a threshold enhancement in the $J/\psi\phi$ mass distribution consistent with the $\chi_{c1}(4140)$ state with a statistical significance of 3.1 standard deviations.

³Branching fractions are normalized to 382 ± 22 events of $B^+ \to J/\psi\phi K^+$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(4274)K^+, \chi_{c1} \to J/\psi(1S)\phi) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+) \quad \Gamma_{313/\Gamma_{307}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.1 ± 2.5 ± 3.5<sup>+2.4</sup><sub>-2.4</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;18.1</td><td>90</td><td>LEES</td><td>15</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 8</td><td>90</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>12AA LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 17</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in amplitude analysis of $B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+$.

²Branching fractions are normalized to 382 ± 22 events of $B^+ \to J/\psi\phi K^+$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(4500)K^+, \chi_{c0} \to J/\psi(1S)\phi) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+) \quad \Gamma_{314/\Gamma_{307}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.6 ± 2.4 ± 3.5<sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-2.3</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in amplitude analysis of $B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(4700)K^+, \chi_{c0} \to J/\psi(1S)\phi) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+) \quad \Gamma_{315/\Gamma_{307}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.12 ± 0.05 ± 0.09<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.05</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in amplitude analysis of $B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\omega K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{316/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.2 ± 0.1 ± 0.6<sup>+0.3</sup><sub>-0.3</sub></td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA...10B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.5 ± 0.2 ± 0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08W BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10B</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3915)K^+, \chi_{c0} \to J/\psi\omega) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{317/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.0 ± 1.0 ± 0.5<sup>+0.6</sup><sub>-0.6</sub></td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA...10B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.9 ± 1.0 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08W BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10B</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3915)K^+, \chi_{c0} \to p\bar{p}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{299/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7.1 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13s LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured relative to $B^+ \to J/\psi K^+$ decay with charmonia reconstructed in $p\bar{p}$ final state and using $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.013 \pm 0.034) \times 10^{-3}$ and $B(J/\psi \to p\bar{p}) = (2.17 \pm 0.07) \times 10^{-3}$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{318/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>(3.92 ± 0.09) × 10<sup>-5</sup> OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>(3.8 ± 0.6 ± 0.3) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>1 ABE</td><td>03B BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^+) \quad \Gamma_{318/\Gamma_{295}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVENTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.85 ± 0.04 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.85 ± 0.04 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.83 ± 0.03 ± 0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>170</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.5 ± 0.3 ± 1.2</td><td>AABOUD</td><td>16L ATLS</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>4.86 ± 0.82 ± 0.15</td><td>ABULENCIA</td><td>09 CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5.37 ± 0.45 ± 0.11</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04P BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.0 ± 1.9<sup>+1.7</sup><sub>-1.7</sub> ± 0.1</td><td>ABE</td><td>96R CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5.2 ± 2.4</td><td>BISHAI</td><td>96 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.83 ± 0.11 ± 0.07</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AC LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 170</td></tr><tr><td>3.91 ± 0.78 ± 0.19</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>02F BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 04P</td></tr><tr><td>4.3 ± 2.3</td><td>5</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>95 CLE2</td><td>Sup. by BISHAI 96</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+ B^-$ and $B^0 B^0$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^-) / \Gamma(\psi(2S)K^+) \quad \Gamma_{319/\Gamma_{330}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.88 ± 0.17 ± 0.09</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17k LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Contains also the contribution from $B^+ \to \psi(2S) [\to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^- \pi^+\pi^+ \to \text{decays}]$.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma(\psi(2S)K^+) \quad \Gamma_{320/\Gamma_{330}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.04 ± 0.50 ± 0.26</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17k LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\rho^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{321/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.1 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.4.</td></tr><tr><td>3.81 ± 0.25<sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.24</sub> ± 0.35</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>190 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5.0 ± 0.7 ± 0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AC BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;77</td><td>90</td><td>BISHAI</td><td>96 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+ \pi^0 \text{ nonresonant}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{322/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.73</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AC BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\alpha_1(1260)^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{323/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>BISHAI</td><td>96 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\rho\bar{p}\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{324/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.0 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13z LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $B(B^0_S \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = (1.98 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\rho\bar{p}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{325/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>14.6 ± 1.2 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>15.1 ± 0.8 ± 1.0</td><td>1 SIRUNYAN</td><td>19CM CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>11.7 ± 2.8 ± 1.8<sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-2.3</sub></td><td>2 XIE</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>12 ± 9<sup>+6</sup><sub>-6</sub></td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>03K BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;41</td><td>90</td><td>ZANG</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹SIRUNYAN 19CM reports $B(B^+ \to J/\psi\bar{p}p)/B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^*(892)) = (1.054 \pm 0.057 \pm 0.035 \pm 0.011) \times 10^{-2}$ and rescaled with the best value of $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^*(892)) = (1.43 \pm 0.08) \times 10^{-3}$, where the last uncertainty is the uncertainty from the branching fractions of $\Lambda$ and $K^*(892)$ to reconstructed final states.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\Sigma^0 p) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{326/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 XIE</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)D^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{327/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;12</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05U BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\bar{D}^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{328/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 ZHANG</td><td>05B BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05R BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{329/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.44 ± 0.22 ± 0.20</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.