Γ99 $\bar{K}_2(1770)^0 K^*(892)^0 + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow K^*(892)^0 K^-\pi^+ + \text{c.c.}$ (6.9 ± 0.9) × 10⁻⁴

Γ100 $K_2^*(1980)^+ K^- + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow K^+ K^-\pi^0$ (1.10 ± 0.14) × 10⁻⁵

Γ101 $K_4^*(2045)^+ K^- + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow K^+ K^-\pi^0$ (6.2 ± 1.6) × 10⁻⁶

Γ102 $K_1(1270)^\pm K^\mp$ < 3.0 × 10⁻³ CL=90%

Γ103 $K_1(1270) K_S^0 \rightarrow \gamma K_S^0 K_S^0$ (8.5 ± 2.5) × 10⁻⁷

Γ104 $\bar{\alpha}_2(1320)^\pm \pi^\mp$ [b] < 4.3 × 10⁻³ CL=90%

Γ105 $\phi\pi^0$ 3 × 10⁻⁶ or 1 × 10⁻⁷

Γ106 $\phi\pi^+\pi^-$ (9.4 ± 1.5) × 10⁻⁴ S=1.7

Γ107 $\phi\pi^0\pi^0$ (5.0 ± 1.0) × 10⁻⁴

Γ108 $\phi(2\pi^+\pi^-)$ (1.60 ± 0.32) × 10⁻³

Γ109 $\phi\eta$ (7.4 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁴ S=1.2

Γ110 $\phi\eta'(958)$ (4.6 ± 0.5) × 10⁻⁴ S=2.2

Γ111 $\phi\eta\eta'$ (2.32 ± 0.17) × 10⁻⁴

Γ112 $\phi f_0(980)$ (3.2 ± 0.9) × 10⁻⁴ S=1.9

Γ113 $\phi f_0(980) \rightarrow \phi\pi^+\pi^-$ (2.60 ± 0.34) × 10⁻⁴

Γ114 $\phi f_0(980) \rightarrow \phi\pi^0\pi^0$ (1.8 ± 0.5) × 10⁻⁴

Γ115 $\phi\pi^0 f_0(980) \rightarrow \phi\pi^0\pi^+\pi^-$ (4.5 ± 1.0) × 10⁻⁶

Γ116 $\phi\pi^0 f_0(980) \rightarrow \phi\pi^0 p^0\pi^0$ (1.7 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁶

Γ117 $\phi f_0(980)\eta \rightarrow \eta\phi\pi^+\pi^-$ (3.2 ± 1.0) × 10⁻⁴

Γ118 $\phi\alpha_0(980)^0 \rightarrow \phi\eta\pi^0$ (4.4 ± 1.4) × 10⁻⁶

Γ119 $\phi f_2(1270)$ (3.2 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁴

Γ120 $\phi f_1(1285)$ (2.6 ± 0.5) × 10⁻⁴

Γ121 $\phi f_1(1285) \rightarrow \phi\pi^0 f_0(980) \rightarrow \phi\pi^0\pi^+\pi^-$ (9.4 ± 2.8) × 10⁻⁷

Γ122 $\phi f_1(1285) \rightarrow \phi\pi^0 f_0(980) \rightarrow \phi\pi^0\pi^0$ (2.1 ± 2.2) × 10⁻⁷

Γ123 $\phi\eta(1405) \rightarrow \phi\eta\pi^+\pi^-$ (2.0 ± 1.0) × 10⁻⁵

Γ124 $\phi f'_2(1525)$ (8 ± 4) × 10⁻⁴ S=2.7

Γ125 $\phi X(1835) \rightarrow \phi p\bar{p}$ < 2.1 × 10⁻⁷ CL=90%

Γ126 $\phi X(1835) \rightarrow \phi\eta\pi^+\pi^-$ < 2.8 × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%

Γ127 $\phi X(1870) \rightarrow \phi\eta\pi^+\pi^-$ < 6.13 × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%

Γ128 $\phi K\bar{K}$ (1.77 ± 0.16) × 10⁻³ S=1.3

Γ129 $\phi f_0(1710) \rightarrow \phi K\bar{K}$ (3.6 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁴

Γ130 $\phi K^+K^-$ (8.3 ± 1.1) × 10⁻⁴

Γ131 $\phi K_S^0 K_S^0$ (5.9 ± 1.5) × 10⁻⁴

Γ132 $\phi K^\pm K_S^0\pi^\mp$ [b] (7.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻⁴

Γ133 $\phi K^*(892)\bar{K} + \text{c.c.}$ (2.18 ± 0.23) × 10⁻³

Γ134 $b_1(1235)^\pm\pi^\mp$ [b] (3.0 ± 0.5) × 10⁻³

Γ135 $b_1(1235)^0\pi^0$ (2.3 ± 0.6) × 10⁻³

Γ136 $f'_2(1525) K^+K^-$ (1.04 ± 0.35) × 10⁻³

Γ137 $\Delta(1232)^+\bar{p}$ < 1 × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%

Γ138 $\Delta(1232)^++\bar{p}\pi^-$ (1.6 ± 0.5) × 10⁻³

Γ139 $\Delta(1232)^++\bar{\Delta}(1232)^--$ (1.10 ± 0.29) × 10⁻³

Γ140 $\bar{\Sigma}(1385)^0\rho K^-$ (5.1 ± 3.2) × 10⁻⁴

Γ141 $\Sigma(1385)^0\bar{\Lambda} + \text{c.c.}$ < 8.2 × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%

Γ142 $\Sigma(1385)^-\bar{\Sigma} + \text{c.c.}$ [b] (3.0 ± 0.7) × 10⁻⁴

Γ143 $\Sigma(1385)^+\bar{\Sigma} + \text{c.c.}$ (3.3 ± 0.8) × 10⁻⁴

Γ144 $\Sigma(1385)^-\bar{\Sigma}(1385)^+ + \text{c.c.}$ [b] (1.08 ± 0.06) × 10⁻³

Γ145 $\Sigma(1385)^+\bar{\Sigma}(1385)^- + \text{c.c.}$ (1.25 ± 0.07) × 10⁻³

Γ146 $\Sigma(1385)^0\bar{\Sigma}(1385)^0$ (1.07 ± 0.08) × 10⁻³

Γ147 $\Lambda(1520)\bar{\Lambda} + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow \gamma\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}$ < 4.1 × 10⁻⁶ CL=90%

Γ148 $\bar{\Lambda}(1520)\Lambda + \text{c.c.}$ < 1.80 × 10⁻³ CL=90%

Γ149 $\Xi^0\Xi^0$ (1.17 ± 0.04) × 10⁻³

Γ150 $\Xi(1530)^-\Xi^+ + \text{c.c.}$ (3.18 ± 0.08) × 10⁻⁴

Γ151 $\Xi(1530)^0\Xi^0$ (3.2 ± 1.4) × 10⁻⁴

Γ152 $\Theta(1540)\bar{\Theta}(1540) \rightarrow K_S^0 p K^-\bar{\pi}^+ + \text{c.c.}$ [c] < 1.1 × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%

Γ153 $\Theta(1540) K^-\bar{\pi} \rightarrow K_S^0 p K^-\bar{\pi}$ [c] < 2.1 × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%

Γ154 $\Theta(1540) K_S^0\bar{p} \rightarrow K_S^0 p K^+ n$ [c] < 1.6 × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%

Γ155 $\bar{\Theta}(1540) K^+ n \rightarrow K_S^0 p K^+ n$ [c] < 5.6 × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%

Γ156 $\bar{\Theta}(1540) K_S^0 p \rightarrow K_S^0 p K^-\bar{\pi}$ [c] < 1.1 × 10⁻⁵ CL=90%

Decays into stable hadrons

Γ157 $2(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0$ (4.2 ± 0.4) % S=2.1

Γ158 $3(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0$ (2.9 ± 0.6) %

Γ159 $\pi^+\pi^-3\pi^0$ (1.9 ± 0.9) %

Γ160 $\rho^\pm\pi^\mp\pi^0$ (1.41 ± 0.22) %

Γ161 $\rho^+\rho^-\pi^0$ (6.0 ± 1.1) × 10⁻³

Γ162 $\pi^+\pi^-4\pi^0$ (6.5 ± 1.3) × 10⁻³

Γ163 $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ (2.00 ± 0.07) % S=2.0

Γ164 $2(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)$ (1.61 ± 0.20) %

Γ165 $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0 K^+K^-$ (1.52 ± 0.27) % S=1.4

Γ166 $\pi^+\pi^-$ (1.47 ± 0.14) × 10⁻⁴

Γ167 $2(\pi^+\pi^-)$ (3.20 ± 0.25) × 10⁻³ S=1.2

Γ168 $3(\pi^+\pi^-)$ (4.3 ± 0.4) × 10⁻³

Γ169 $2(\pi^+\pi^-)3\pi^0$ (6.2 ± 0.9) %

Γ170 $4(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0$ (9.0 ± 3.0) × 10⁻³

Γ171 $2(\pi^+\pi^-)\eta$ (2.29 ± 0.28) × 10⁻³

Γ172 $3(\pi^+\pi^-)\eta$ (7.2 ± 1.5) × 10⁻⁴

Γ173 $2(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)\eta$ (1.6 ± 0.5) × 10⁻³

Γ174 $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0\eta$ (2.4 ± 0.5) × 10⁻³

Γ175 $\rho^\pm\pi^\mp\pi^0\eta$ (1.9 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³

Γ176 $K^+K^-$ (2.86 ± 0.21) × 10⁻⁴

Γ177 $K_S^0 K_S^0$ (1.95 ± 0.11) × 10⁻⁴ S=2.4

Γ178 $K_S^0 K_S^0$ < 1.4 × 10⁻⁸ CL=95%

Γ179 $K\bar{K}\pi$ (6.1 ± 1.0) × 10⁻³

Γ180 $K^+K^-\pi^0$ (2.88 ± 0.12) × 10⁻³

Γ181 $K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^\mp$ (5.3 ± 0.5) × 10⁻³

Γ182 $K_S^0 K_L^0\pi^0$ (2.06 ± 0.26) × 10⁻³

Γ183 $K^*(892)^0\bar{K}^0 + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow K_S^0 K_L^0\pi^0$ (1.21 ± 0.18) × 10⁻³

Γ184 $K_2^*(1430)^0\bar{K}^0 + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow K_S^0 K_L^0\pi^0$ (4.3 ± 1.3) × 10⁻⁴

Γ185 $K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-$ (7.0 ± 1.0) × 10⁻³

Γ186 $K^+K^-\pi^0\pi^0$ (2.13 ± 0.22) × 10⁻³

Γ187 $K^+K^-\pi^0\pi^0$ (1.61 ± 0.29) × 10⁻³

Γ188 $K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^+\pi^0\pi^0$ (5.3 ± 0.7) × 10⁻³

Γ189 $K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-$ (6.3 ± 0.4) × 10⁻³

Γ190 $K_S^0 K^\pm\rho(770)^0\pi^0$ (2.9 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³

Γ191 $K_S^0 K_L^0\pi^+\pi^-$ (3.8 ± 0.6) × 10⁻³

Γ192 $K_S^0 K_L^0\pi^0\pi^0$ (1.9 ± 0.4) × 10⁻³

Γ193 $K_S^0 K_L^0\eta$ (1.45 ± 0.33) × 10⁻³

Γ194 $K_S^0 K_S^0\pi^+\pi^-$ (1.68 ± 0.19) × 10⁻³

Γ195 $K^\mp K_S^0\pi^+\pi^0$ (5.7 ± 0.5) × 10⁻³

Γ196 $K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^+\rho(770)^0$ (3.1 ± 0.5) × 10⁻³

Γ197 $K^+K^-2(\pi^+\pi^-)$ (3.1 ± 1.3) × 10⁻³

Γ198 $K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-\eta$ (4.7 ± 0.7) × 10⁻³

Γ199 $2(K^+K^-)$ (7.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻⁴

Γ200 $K^+K^-K_S^0 K_S^0$ (4.2 ± 0.7) × 10⁻⁴

Γ201 $K_S^0 K^*(892)^0\pi^+\pi^-$ (1.7 ± 0.6) × 10⁻³

Γ202 $K_S^0 K^*(892)^0\pi^0\pi^0$ (1.01 ± 0.18) × 10⁻³

Γ203 $K^\mp K^*(892)^\pm\pi^+\pi^-$ (3.4 ± 1.2) × 10⁻³

Γ204 $K^*(892)^\pm K^*(892)^0\pi^\mp$ (4.8 ± 1.0) × 10⁻³

Γ205 $K^\mp K^*(892)^\pm\pi^0\pi^0$ (1.57 ± 0.32) × 10⁻³

Γ206 $K^*(892)^+ K^*(892)^0\pi^0$ (1.12 ± 0.23) %

Γ207 $p\bar{p}$ (2.120 ± 0.029) × 10⁻³

Γ208 $p\bar{p}\pi^0$ (1.19 ± 0.08) × 10⁻³ S=1.1

Γ209 $p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-$ (6.0 ± 0.5) × 10⁻³ S=1.3

Γ210 $p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ [d] (2.3 ± 0.9) × 10⁻³ S=1.9

Γ211 $p\bar{p}\eta$ < 3.1 × 10⁻⁴ CL=90%

Γ212 $p\bar{p}\rho$ (9.8 ± 1.0) × 10⁻⁴ S=1.3

Γ213 $p\bar{p}\omega$ (1.29 ± 0.14) × 10⁻⁴ S=2.0

Γ214 $p\bar{p}\eta'(958)$ (6.8 ± 1.8) × 10⁻⁵

Γ215 $p\bar{p}\alpha_0(980) \rightarrow p\bar{p}\pi^0\eta$ (5.19 ± 0.33) × 10⁻⁵

Γ216 $p\bar{p}\phi$ (2.12 ± 0.09) × 10⁻³ S=1.3

Γ217 $p\bar{\pi}\pi^-$ (2.09 ± 0.16) × 10⁻³ S=1.3

Γ218 $n\bar{\pi}$ (4 ± 4) × 10⁻³

Γ219 $n\bar{\pi}\pi^+\pi^-$ (4 ± 4) × 10⁻³

Γ220 $nN(1440)$ seen

Γ221 $nN(1520)$ seen

Γ222 $nN(1535)$ seen

Γ223 $\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}$ (1.88 ± 0.08) × 10⁻³ S=2.6

Γ224 $\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}\pi^0$ (3.8 ± 0.4) × 10⁻⁵

Γ225 $\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}\pi^+\pi^-$ (4.3 ± 1.0) × 10⁻³

Γ226 $\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}\eta$ (1.62 ± 0.17) × 10⁻⁴

Γ227 $\Lambda\bar{\Sigma}^+\pi^+ + \text{c.c.}$ [b] (1.26 ± 0.05) × 10⁻³ S=1.2

Γ228 $\Lambda\bar{\Sigma}^+\pi^+ + \text{c.c.}$ (1.21 ± 0.07) × 10⁻³ S=1.8

Γ229 $\rho K^-\bar{\Lambda} + \text{c.c.}$ (8.6 ± 1.1) × 10⁻⁴

Γ230 $\rho K^-\bar{\Sigma}^0$ (2.9 ± 0.8) × 10⁻⁴

Γ231 $\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}n K_S^0 + \text{c.c.}$ (6.5 ± 1.1) × 10⁻⁴

Γ232 $\Lambda\bar{\Sigma}^+ + \text{c.c.}$ (2.83 ± 0.23) × 10⁻⁵

Γ233 $\Sigma^+\Sigma^-$ (1.07 ± 0.04) × 10⁻³

Γ234 $\Sigma^0\Sigma^0$ (1.172 ± 0.032) × 10⁻³ S=1.4

Γ235 $\Sigma^+\Sigma^-$ (6.3 ± 0.4) × 10⁻³ S=1.4

Γ236 $\Xi^-\Xi^+$ (9.7 ± 0.8) × 10⁻⁴ S=1.4
Radiative decays

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>237</sub> γη<sub>c</sub>(1S)</td>
      <td>( 1.41 ± 0.14 ) %</td>
      <td>S=1.3</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>238</sub> γη<sub>c</sub>(1S) → 3γ</td>
      <td>seen</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>239</sub> γη<sub>c</sub>(1S) → γηηη'</td>
      <td>seen</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>240</sub> 3γ</td>
      <td>( 1.16 ± 0.22 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>241</sub> 4γ</td>
      <td>&lt; 9 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>242</sub> 5γ</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>243</sub> γπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.39 ± 0.08 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>244</sub> γπ<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.15 ± 0.05 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>245</sub> γ2π<sup>+2</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.8 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>S=1.9</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>246</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(1270) f<sub>2</sub>(1270)</td>
      <td>( 9.5 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>247</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(1270) f<sub>2</sub>(1270) (non resonant)</td>
      <td>( 8.2 ± 1.9 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>248</sub> γπ<sup>+2</sup>π<sup>-</sup>2π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 8.3 ± 3.1 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>249</sub> γK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 8.1 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>250</sub> γ(K<sup>−</sup>K<sup>−</sup>π) [J<sup>PC</sup> = 0<sup>−</sup>]</td>
      <td>( 7 ± 4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>S=2.1</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>251</sub> γK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>−</sup>π<sup>+2</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.1 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>252</sub> γK<sup>*</sup>(892)K<sup>*</sup>(892)</td>
      <td>( 4.0 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>253</sub> γη</td>
      <td>( 1.090 ± 0.013 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>254</sub> γηπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.14 ± 0.31 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>255</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(500) → γππ</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>256</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(500) → γK<sup>−</sup>K<sup>−</sup></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>257</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(500) → γηη</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>258</sub> γa<sub>0</sub>(980)<sup>0</sup> → γηπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 2.5 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>CL=95%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>259</sub> γa<sub>2</sub>(1320)<sup>0</sup> → γηπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 6.6 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>CL=95%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>260</sub> γηππ</td>
      <td>( 6.1 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>261</sub> γη<sub>2</sub>(1870) → γηπ<sup>+2</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 6.2 ± 2.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>262</sub> γη<sup>′</sup>(958)</td>
      <td>( 5.28 ± 0.06 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>S=1.3</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>263</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(980) → γππ</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>264</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(980) → γK<sup>−</sup>K<sup>−</sup></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>265</sub> γρρ</td>
      <td>( 4.5 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>266</sub> γρω</td>
      <td>&lt; 5.4 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>267</sub> γρφ</td>
      <td>&lt; 8.8 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>268</sub> γωω</td>
      <td>( 1.61 ± 0.33 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>269</sub> γφφ</td>
      <td>( 4.0 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>S=2.1</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>270</sub> γη(1405/1475) → γK<sup>−</sup>K<sup>−</sup>π</td>
      <td>( 2.8 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>S=1.6</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>271</sub> γη(1405/1475) → γγρ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.8 ± 2.0 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>S=1.8</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>272</sub> γη(1405/1475) → γηπ<sup>+2</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.0 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>273</sub> γη(1405/1475) → γρρ<sup>0</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.7 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>S=1.3</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>274</sub> γη(1405/1475) → γγφ</td>
      <td>&lt; 8.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>CL=95%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>275</sub> γη(1405) → γγγ</td>
      <td>&lt; 2.63 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>276</sub> γη(1475) → γγγ</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.86 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>277</sub> γη(1760) → γρρ<sup>0</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.3 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>278</sub> γη(1760) → γωω</td>
      <td>( 1.98 ± 0.33 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>279</sub> γη(1760) → γγγ</td>
      <td>&lt; 4.80 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>280</sub> γη(2225)</td>
      <td>( 3.14 ± 0.50 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>281</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(1270)</td>
      <td>( 1.63 ± 0.12 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>S=1.3</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>282</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(1270) → γK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.58 ± 0.60 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>283</sub> γf<sub>1</sub>(1285)</td>
      <td>( 6.1 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>284</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1370) → γππ</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>285</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1370) → γK<sup>−</sup>K<sup>−</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.2 ± 1.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>286</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1370) → γK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.1 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>287</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1370) → γηη</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>288</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1370) → γηηη'</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>289</sub> γf<sub>1</sub>(1420) → γK<sup>−</sup>K<sup>−</sup>π</td>
      <td>( 7.9 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>290</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1500) → γππ</td>
      <td>( 1.09 ± 0.24 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>291</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1500) → γηη</td>
      <td>( 1.7 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>292</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1500) → γK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.59 ± 0.60 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>293</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1500) → γηηη'</td>
      <td>( 4.5 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>294</sub> γf<sub>1</sub>(1510) → γηπ<sup>+2</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.7 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>S=1.5</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>295</sub> γf'<sub>2</sub>(1525)</td>
      <td>( 5.7 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>296</sub> γf'<sub>2</sub>(1525) → γK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 8.0 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>297</sub> γf'<sub>2</sub>(1525) → γηη</td>
      <td>( 3.4 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>298</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(1565) → γηηη'</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>299</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(1640) → γωω</td>
      <td>( 2.8 ± 1.8 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>300</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1710) → γππ</td>
      <td>( 3.8 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>301</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1710) → γK<sup>−</sup>K<sup>−</sup></td>
      <td>( 9.5 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>S=1.5</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>302</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1710) → γωω</td>
      <td>( 3.1 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>303</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1710) → γηη</td>
      <td>( 2.4 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>304</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1710) → γηηη'</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>305</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1710) → γωφ</td>
      <td>( 2.5 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>306</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1770) → γK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.11 ± 0.20 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>307</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(1810) → γηη</td>
      <td>( 5.4 ± 3.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>308</sub> γη<sub>1</sub>(1855) → γηηη'</td>
      <td>( 2.7 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>309</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(1770) → γηηη'</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>310</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(1910) → γωω</td>
      <td>( 2.0 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>311</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(1950) → γK<sup>*</sup>(892)K<sup>*</sup>(892)</td>
      <td>( 7.0 ± 2.2 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>312</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(2010) → γηηη'</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>313</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2020) → γππ</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>314</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2020) → γK<sup>−</sup>K<sup>−</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>315</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2020) → γηη</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>316</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2020) → γηηη'</td>
      <td>( 2.63 ± 0.32 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>317</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2020) → γηηη'</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>318</sub> γf<sub>4</sub>(2050)</td>
      <td>( 2.7 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>319</sub> γf<sub>4</sub>(2050) → γηηη'</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>320</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2100) → γηη</td>
      <td>( 1.13 ± 0.60 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>321</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2100) → γK<sup>−</sup>K<sup>−</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>322</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2100) → γππ</td>
      <td>( 6.2 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>323</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2200)</td>
      <td>seen</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>324</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2200) → γK<sup>−</sup>K<sup>−</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.9 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>325</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2200) → γK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.72 ± 0.19 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>326</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2200) → γππ</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>327</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2200) → γηη</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>328</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(2220)</td>
      <td>seen</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>329</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(2220) → γππ</td>
      <td>&lt; 3.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>330</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(2220) → γK<sup>−</sup>K<sup>−</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 4.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>331</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(2220) → γρp</td>
      <td>( 1.5 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>332</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2330) → γK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.9 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>333</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2330) → γππ</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>334</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2330) → γηη</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>335</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2330) → γηηη'</td>
      <td>( 6.1 ± 4.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>336</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2330) → γηηη'</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>337</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(2340) → γηη</td>
      <td>( 5.6 ± 2.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>338</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(2340) → γK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.5 ± 4.0 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>339</sub> γf<sub>2</sub>(2340) → γηηη'</td>
      <td>( 8.7 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>340</sub> γf<sub>0</sub>(2470) → γηηη'</td>
      <td>( 8.2 ± 4.0 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>341</sub> γX(1835) → γπ<sup>+2</sup>π<sup>-</sup>η'</td>
      <td>( 2.7 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>342</sub> γX(1835) → γρp</td>
      <td>( 7.7 ± 1.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>343</sub> γX(1835) → γK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>η</td>
      <td>( 3.3 ± 2.0 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>344</sub> γX(1835) → γγφ(1020)</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>345</sub> γX(1835) → γγγ</td>
      <td>&lt; 3.56 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>346</sub> γX(1835) → γ3(π<sup>+2</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 2.4 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>347</sub> γX(2370) → γK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>η'</td>
      <td>( 1.8 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>348</sub> γX(2370) → γK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>η'</td>
      <td>( 1.2 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>349</sub> γX(2370) → γηηηη'</td>
      <td>&lt; 9.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>350</sub> γρp</td>
      <td>( 3.8 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>351</sub> γρpπ<sup>+2</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 7.9 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>352</sub> γΛ</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.3 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>353</sub> γA<sup>0</sup> → γinvisible</td>
      <td>[e] &lt; 1.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>354</sub> γA<sup>0</sup> → γμ<sup>+2</sup>μ<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>[f] &lt; 7.8 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

Dalitz decays

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>355</sub> π<sup>0</sup>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.6 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>356</sub> ηe<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.42 ± 0.08 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>357</sub> η'(958) e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 6.59 ± 0.18 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>358</sub> X(1835) e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>, X → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>η'</td>
      <td>( 3.58 ± 0.25 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>359</sub> X(2120) e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>, X → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>η'</td>
      <td>( 8.2 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>360</sub> X(2370) e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>, X → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>η'</td>
      <td>( 1.08 ± 0.17 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>361</sub> ηU → ηe<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> [g] &lt; 9.11</td>
      <td>× 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>362</sub> η'(958)U → η'(958) e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> [g] &lt; 2.0</td>
      <td>× 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>363</sub> φe<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &lt; 1.2</td>
      <td>× 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

Weak decays

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>364</sub> D<sup>-</sup>e<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>e</sub> + c.c.</td>
      <td>&lt; 7.1</td>
      <td>× 10<sup>-8</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>365</sub> D<sup>0</sup>e<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>e</sub> + c.c.</td>
      <td>&lt; 8.5</td>
      <td>× 10<sup>-8</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ<sub>366</sub> D<sup>-</sup><sub>S</sub>e<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>e</sub> + c.c.</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.3</td>
      <td>× 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>367</sub></td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>*-</sup>e<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>e</sub> + c.c.</td><td>&lt; 1.8</td><td>× 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>368</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td><td>&lt; 7.5</td><td>× 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>369</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> R<sup>0</sup> + c.c.</td><td>&lt; 1.7</td><td>× 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>370</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> R<sup>*0</sup> + c.c.</td><td>&lt; 2.5</td><td>× 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>371</sub></td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td><td>&lt; 1.3</td><td>× 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>372</sub></td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup>ρ<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td><td>&lt; 1.3</td><td>× 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr></table>

Charge conjugation (C), Parity (P), Lepton Family number (LF) violating modes

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>373</sub></td><td>γγ</td><td>C</td><td>&lt; 2.7</td><td>× 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>374</sub></td><td>γφ</td><td>C</td><td>&lt; 1.4</td><td>× 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>375</sub></td><td>e<sup>±</sup>μ<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 1.6</td><td>× 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>376</sub></td><td>e<sup>±</sup>τ<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 7.5</td><td>× 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>377</sub></td><td>μ<sup>±</sup>τ<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 2.0</td><td>× 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>378</sub></td><td>Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub>e<sup>-</sup> + c.c.</td><td></td><td>&lt; 6.9</td><td>× 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr></table>

Other decays

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>379</sub></td><td>invisible</td><td>&lt; 7</td><td>× 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr></table>

[a] For $E_γ > 100$ MeV.

[b] The value is for the sum of the charge states or particle/antiparticle states indicated.

[c] $\Theta(1540)$ is a hypothetical pentaquark state of $1.54 \text{ GeV/c}^2$ mass and a width of less than 25 MeV/c$^2$.

[d] Includes $p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-\gamma$ and excludes $p\bar{p}\eta, p\bar{p}\omega, p\bar{p}\eta'$.

[e] For a narrow state A with mass less than 960 MeV.

[f] For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar $A^0$ with mass 0.21-3.0 GeV.

[g] For a dark photon U with mass between 100 and 2100 MeV.

FIT INFORMATION

A multiparticle fit to $\eta_C(1S)$, $J/\psi(1S)$, $\psi(2S)$, $h_C(1P)$, and $B^\pm$ with the total width, 10 combinations of partial widths obtained from integrated cross section, and 38 branching ratios uses 113 measurements to determine 19 parameters. The overall fit has a $\chi^2 = 184.6$ for 94 degrees of freedom.

J/ψ(1S) PARTIAL WIDTHS

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(hadrons)</th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>1</sub></th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (keV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>81.37 ± 1.36 ± 1.30</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>20</td><td>KEDR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>74.1 ± 8.1</td><td>BAI</td><td>95B</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>59 ± 24</td><td>BALDINI...</td><td>75</td><td>FRAG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>59 ± 14</td><td>BOYARSKI</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>50 ± 25</td><td>ESPOSITO</td><td>75B</td><td>FRAM e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Based on the same dataset as ANASHIN 18A and correlated to the values reported there.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)</th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>5</sub></th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (keV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.550 ± 0.056 ± 0.089</td><td>1.2 ANASHIN</td><td>18A</td><td>KEDR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.36 ± 0.29<br/>-0.28</td><td>3 HSUEH</td><td>92</td><td>RVUE See T mini-review</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.58 ± 0.05 ± 0.08</td><td>4 ABLIKIM</td><td>16Q</td><td>BES3 3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.71 ± 0.16</td><td>5 ADAMS</td><td>06A</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.57 ± 0.19</td><td>5 AUBERT</td><td>04</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.14 ± 0.39</td><td>BAI</td><td>95B</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.72 ± 0.35</td><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>89</td><td>RVUE See T mini-review</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.4 ± 0.6</td><td>3 BRANDELIK</td><td>79C</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.6 ± 0.8</td><td>6 BALDINI...</td><td>75</td><td>FRAG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.8 ± 0.6</td><td>BOYARSKI</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.6 ± 1.0</td><td>ESPOSITO</td><td>75B</td><td>FRAM e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 From the cross sections of $e^+e^- \to e^+e^-$ and $e^+e^- \to$ hadrons near the $J/\psi(1S)$ peak.

2 Based on the same dataset as ANASHIN 20 and correlated to the values reported there.

3 From a simultaneous fit to $e^+e^-, \mu^+\mu^-$, and hadronic channels assuming $\Gamma(e^+e^-) = \Gamma(\mu^+\mu^-)$.

4 Using $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (5.973 \pm 0.007 \pm 0.037)\%$ from ABLIKIM 13R.

5 Calculated by us from the reported values of $\Gamma(e^+e^-) \times B(\mu^+\mu^-)$ using $B(\mu^+\mu^-) = (5.93 \pm 0.06)\%$.

6 Assuming equal partial widths for $e^+e^-$ and $\mu^+\mu^-$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup>)</th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>7</sub></th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (keV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.13 ± 0.52</td><td>BAI</td><td>95B</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.8 ± 0.6</td><td>BOYARSKI</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5 ± 1</td><td>ESPOSITO</td><td>75B</td><td>FRAM e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(γγ)</th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>373</sub></th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.4</td><td>90</td><td>BRANDELIK</td><td>79C</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

J/ψ(1S) Γ(i)Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ(total)

This combination of a partial width with the partial width into $e^+e^-$ and with the total width is obtained from the integrated cross section into channel(i) in the $e^+e^-$ annihilation.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(hadrons) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>1</sub>Γ<sub>5</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (keV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.884 ± 0.048 ± 0.078</td><td>1,2 ANASHIN</td><td>18A</td><td>KEDR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4 ± 0.8</td><td>3 BALDINI...</td><td>75</td><td>FRAG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.9 ± 0.8</td><td>3 ESPOSITO</td><td>75B</td><td>FRAM e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 From the cross sections of $e^+e^- \to e^+e^-$ and $e^+e^- \to$ hadrons near the $J/\psi(1S)$ peak.

2 Based on the same dataset as ANASHIN 20 and correlated to the values reported there.

3 Data redundant with branching ratios or partial widths above.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>5</sub>Γ<sub>5</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>333.1 ± 6.6 ± 4.0</td><td>1,2 ANASHIN</td><td>18A</td><td>KEDR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>332.3 ± 6.4 ± 4.8</td><td>ANASHIN</td><td>10</td><td>KEDR 3.097 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>350 ± 20</td><td>BRANDELIK</td><td>79C</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>320 ± 70</td><td>3 BALDINI...</td><td>75</td><td>FRAG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>340 ± 90</td><td>3 ESPOSITO</td><td>75B</td><td>FRAM e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>360 ± 100</td><td>3 FORD</td><td>75</td><td>SPEC e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 From the cross sections of $e^+e^- \to e^+e^-$ and $e^+e^- \to$ hadrons near the $J/\psi(1S)$ peak.

2 Based on the same dataset as ANASHIN 20 and correlated to the values reported there.

3 Data redundant with branching ratios or partial widths above.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>7</sub>Γ<sub>5</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>333 ± 4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>333.4 ± 2.5 ± 4.4</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>16Q</td><td>BES3 3.773 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>331.8 ± 5.2 ± 6.3</td><td>ANASHIN</td><td>10</td><td>KEDR 3.097 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>338.4 ± 5.8 ± 7.1</td><td>ADAMS</td><td>06A</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>330.1 ± 7.7 ± 7.3</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Data redundant with branching ratios or partial widths above.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(ηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>13</sub>Γ<sub>5</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.3 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.34 ± 0.43 ± 0.16</td><td>49</td><td>LEES</td><td>18</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.22 ± 0.96 ± 0.02</td><td>9</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AU</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AUBERT 07AU reports $\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \to \eta\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\eta \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)] = 0.51 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.03 \text{ eV}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\eta \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) = (23.02 \pm 0.25) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(ηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>15</sub>Γ<sub>5</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>64.8 ± 11.1 ± 0.4</td><td>200</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>21C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>4π<sup>0</sup>)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 21C reports $\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \to \eta\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) \times \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\eta \to 3\gamma)] = 21.1 \pm 1.7 \pm 3.2 \text{ eV}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\eta \to 3\gamma) = (32.57 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(ηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>3π<sup>0</sup>) × Γ(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>16</sub>Γ<sub>5</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>26.9 ± 5.7 ± 0.1</td><td>101</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>21C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>3π<sup>0</sup>γγ)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1 LEES 21C reports $\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \to \eta\pi^+\pi^-3\pi^0) \times \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\eta \to 2\gamma)] = 1.6 \pm 1.6 \text{ eV}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\eta \to 2\gamma) = (39.36 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
$$ \Gamma(\eta K^+ K^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{19\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.76±1.64±0.03</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ<sub>ISR</sub> hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 23 reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → ηK^+K^-) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(η → 3π^0)] = 1.55 \pm 0.51 \pm 0.16 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value } B(η → 3π^0) = (32.57 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\eta K^\pm K_S^0 \pi^\mp) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{20\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.3±1.4±0.4</td><td>44</td><td>LEES</td><td>17d</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm \pi^\mp \rho(770)^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{19\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>17.3±2.1±1.7</td><td></td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ<sub>ISR</sub> hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\rho^\pm \pi^\mp \pi^+ \pi^- 2\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{23\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>155±26±36</td><td>14k</td><td>LEES</td><td>21</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)3π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\rho^+ \pi^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{24\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>32±13±15</td><td>14k</td><td>LEES</td><td>21</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)3π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\rho \mp K^\pm K_S^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{26\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.4±1.0±1.9</td><td>130</td><td>LEES</td><td>17d</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\omega \pi^+ \pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{41\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>53.6±5.0±0.4</td><td>788</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AU</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ωπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AUBERT 07AU reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → ωπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)] = 47.8 \pm 3.1 \pm 3.2 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value } B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\omega \pi^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{42\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>27.8±3.5±0.2</td><td>398</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>18E</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>3π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 18E reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → ωπ<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)] = 24.8 \pm 1.8 \pm 2.5 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value } B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\omega 3\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{43\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.5±3.1±0.1</td><td>89</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>21c</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ<sub>ISR</sub>(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>4π<sup>0</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 21c reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → ω3π<sup>0</sup>) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)] = 9.4 \pm 2.3 \pm 1.5 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value } B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\omega \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{46\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.2±0.3±0.2</td><td>170</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06D</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ωπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\omega \eta) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{45\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>16.9±7.6±0.2</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>21c</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ<sub>ISR</sub>(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>4π<sup>0</sup>)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Different final state as in AUBERT 06. LEES 21c reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → ωη) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(η → 3π<sup>0</sup>) \times [B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)] = 4.9 \pm 2.1 \pm 0.7 \text{ eV which we divide by our best values } B(η → 3π<sup>0</sup>) = (32.57 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-2}, B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(\omega \pi^0 \eta) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{47\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.90±0.96±0.01</td><td>27</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>18E</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>ηγ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 18E reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → ωπ<sup>0</sup>) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)] = 1.7 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.3 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value } B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\omega \pi^+ \pi^- 2\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{49\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>185±30±1</td><td>14k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>21</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)3π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 21 reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → ωπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>2π<sup>0</sup>) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)] = 165 \pm 9 \pm 25 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value } B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\omega K \bar{K}) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{60\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.70±1.98±0.03</td><td>24</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AU</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ωK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AUBERT 07AU reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → ωK\bar{K}) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)] = 3.3 \pm 1.3 \pm 1.2 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value } B(ω(782) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(K^+ K^*(892)^- + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{69\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>29.0±1.7±1.3</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08s</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^+ K^*(892)^- + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow K^+ K^- \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{70\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.96±0.85±0.70</td><td>155</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08s</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^+ K^*(892)^- + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow K^0 K^\pm \pi^\mp + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{71\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>16.76±1.70±1.00</td><td>89</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08s</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^0 K^*(892)^0 + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{72\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>26.6±2.5±1.5</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08s</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>±</sup>*(892)<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^0 K^*(892)^0 + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow K^0 K^\pm \pi^\mp + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{73\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>17.70±1.70±1.00</td><td>94</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08s</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K^+ \pi^- + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{74\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>42.6±4.8±7.2</td><td>99</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Dividing by 1/6 to account for $B(K^*(892)^0 \rightarrow K_S^0 \pi^0) = 1/6$.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^\pm K^\mp \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{75\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>22.8±2.8±6.8</td><td>80</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Dividing by 1/4 to account for $B(K^*(892)^\pm \rightarrow K_S^0 \pi^0) = 1/4$.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^\pm K_S^0 \pi^- + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{76\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.0±2.8 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>9.2±1.2±3.2</td><td>64</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr><tr><td>14.8±4.8±1.2</td><td>53</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>14H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Dividing by 1/2 to take into account $B(K^*(892)^\pm \rightarrow K^\pm \pi^0) = 1/2$.

2 Dividing by 1/4 to take into account $B(K^*(892) \rightarrow K_S^0 \pi^0) = 1/4$.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^\pm K_S^0 \pi^- + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow K_S^0 K_S^0 \pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{77\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.7±1.2±0.3</td><td>53</td><td>LEES</td><td>14H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.60±0.75±2.25</td><td>34</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K_S^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{80\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.60±0.75±2.25</td><td>34</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Dividing by 2/3 to account for $B(K^*(892)^0 \rightarrow K^+\pi^-) = 2/3$.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K^*(892)^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{82\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.28±0.34±0.07</td><td>47±12</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.28±0.40±0.11 25 ± 8, 1,2 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ

1 Dividing by (2/3)² to take twice into account that $B(K^*0 \rightarrow K^+\pi^-) = 2/3$ B(K*0 → Kπ).

2 Superseded by LEES 12F.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^\pm K^0(892)^\mp) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{83\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.80±0.48±0.32</td><td>1 ± 5</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Dividing by (1/4)² to take twice into account $B(K^*(892) \rightarrow K_S^0 \pi^0) = 1/4$.

$$ \Gamma(K_2^*(1430) + K_S^0 \pi^- + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{94\Gamma 5}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>20.1±9.8±0.5</td><td>35</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>14H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Dividing by 1/4 to take into account $B(K^*(1430) \rightarrow K_S^0 \pi^0) = 1/4$ B(K*(1430) → Kπ).

2 LEES 14H reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \rightarrow K_S^0(1430) + K_S^0 \pi^- + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \rightarrow e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(K_2^*(1430) \rightarrow K\pi)] = 10.0 \pm 4.8 \pm 0.8 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value } B(K_2^*(1430) \rightarrow K\pi) = (49.9 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.
$$ \Gamma(\kappa_2^*(1430)^0 \kappa^- \pi^+ + \text{c.c.} \to \kappa^+ \kappa^- \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{93/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.65&plusmn;0.80&plusmn;0.44</td><td>1094</td><td>ANASHIN</td><td>22</td><td>KEDR J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\kappa_2^*(1430)^0 \kappa^*(892)^0 + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{95/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>25.8&plusmn;1.43&plusmn;0.6</td><td>710</td><td>1,2,3 LEES</td><td>12f</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

33 ±4 ±1 317 2,4 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ

1 LEES 12f reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \kappa_2^*(1430)^0 \kappa^*(892)^0 + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\kappa_2^*(1430) \to K\pi)] = 12.89 \pm 0.54 \pm 0.41 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\kappa_2^*(1430) \to K\pi) = (49.9 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Dividing by 2/3 to take into account that $B(K^*0 \to K^+\pi^-) = 2/3$ B($K^0 \to K\pi$).

3 The $\kappa_2^*(1430)$ cannot be distinguished from the $\kappa_0^*(1430)$.

4 Superseded by LEES 12f. AUBERT 07AK reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \kappa_2^*(1430)^0 \kappa^*(892)^0 + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\kappa_2^*(1430) \to K\pi)] = 16.4 \pm 1.1 \pm 1.4 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\kappa_2^*(1430) \to K\pi) = (49.9 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\kappa_2^*(1430)^0 \kappa^*(892)^0 + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{96/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>18.6&plusmn;16.1&plusmn;0.4</td><td>8 &plusmn; 8</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>14H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Dividing by (1/4)<sup>2</sup> to take into account $B(K^*(892) \to K_0^S \pi) = 1/4$ and $B(K^*(1430) \to K_0^S \pi) = 1/4$ $B(K^*(1430) \to K\pi)$.

2 LEES 14h reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \kappa_2^*(1430)^0 \kappa^*(892)^0 + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\kappa_2^*(1430) \to K\pi)] = 9.28 \pm 8.0 \pm 0.32 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\kappa_2^*(1430) \to K\pi) = (49.9 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\kappa_2^*(1430)^0 \kappa^*(892)^0 + \text{c.c.} \to \kappa^*(892)^0 K_0^S \pi^- + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{97/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.32&plusmn;2.00&plusmn;0.08</td><td>8 &plusmn; 8</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Dividing by 1/4 to take into account $B(K^*(892) \to K_0^S \pi) = 1/4$.

$$ \Gamma(\kappa_2(1770)^0 \kappa^*(892)^0 + \text{c.c.} \to \kappa^*(892)^0 K^- \pi^+ + \text{c.c.}) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{99/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.8&plusmn;0.4&plusmn;0.3</td><td>110 &plusmn; 14</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AK</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Dividing by 2/3 to take into account that $B(K^*0 \to K^+\pi^-) = 2/3$.

$$ \Gamma(\phi\pi^0\pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{106/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.48&plusmn;0.35</td><td>181</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12f</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>4.46&plusmn;0.49&plusmn;0.05</th><th>181</th><th>1 LEES</th><th>12f</th><th>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.51&plusmn;0.48&plusmn;0.05</td><td>254 &plusmn; 23</td><td>2 SHEN</td><td>09</td><td>BELL 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>5.3 &plusmn; 0.7 &plusmn; 0.1</th><th>103</th><th>3 AUBERT, BE 06D BABR</th><th>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

1 LEES 12f reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi\pi^0\pi^-) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 2.19 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.07 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 SHEN 09 reports 4.50 ± 0.41 ± 0.26 eV from a measurement of $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi\pi^0\pi^-) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)]$ assuming $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.2 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3 Superseded by LEES 12f. AUBERT, BE 06d reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi\pi^0\pi^-) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 2.61 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.18 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\phi\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{107/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.77&plusmn;0.57&plusmn;0.03</td><td>45</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12f</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>3.13&plusmn;0.88&plusmn;0.03</th><th>23</th><th>2 AUBERT, BE 06D BABR</th><th>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

1 LEES 12f reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 1.36 \pm 0.27 \pm 0.07 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Superseded by LEES 12f. AUBERT, BE 06d reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 1.54 \pm 0.40 \pm 0.16 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\phi(2(\pi^+\pi^-)) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}) \quad \Gamma_{108/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-2</sup> keV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.96&plusmn;0.19&plusmn;0.01</td><td>35</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>06D</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → \phi(2(\pi^+\pi^-))γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AUBERT 06d reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi(2(\pi^+\pi^-)) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = (0.47 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.03) \times 10^{-2} \text{ keV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\phi\eta) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{109/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.6&plusmn;1.4</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>23</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γISR hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>6.1&plusmn;2.7&plusmn;0.4</td><td>6</td><td>2 SHEN</td><td>07AU</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → φηγ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 23 quotes $\Gamma_{ee}^{J/ψ} \cdot B(J/ψ \to \phi\eta) \cdot B(\phi \to K^+K^-) \cdot B(\eta \to 3\pi^0) = 0.64 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.06 \text{ eV}$.

2 AUBERT 07AU quotes $\Gamma_{ee}^{J/ψ} \cdot B(J/ψ \to \phi\eta) \cdot B(\phi \to K^+K^-) \cdot B(\eta \to 3\pi) = 0.84 \pm 0.37 \pm 0.05 \text{ eV}$.

$$ \Gamma(\phi_0(980) \to \phi\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{113/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.40&plusmn;0.25&plusmn;0.01 57 &plusmn; 9 1 LEES 12f BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ

1.48&plusmn;0.27&plusmn;0.09 60 &plusmn; 11 2 SHEN 09 BELL 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.02&plusmn;0.24&plusmn;0.01 20 &plusmn; 5 3 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ

1 LEES 12f reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi_0(980) \to \phi\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.69 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.05 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Multiplied by 2/3 to take into account the $\phi\pi^+\pi^-$ mode only. Using $B(\phi \to K^+K^-) = (49.2 \pm 0.6)\%$.

3 Superseded by LEES 12f. AUBERT 07AK reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi_0(980) \to \phi\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.50 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.04 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\phi_0(980) \to \phi\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{114/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.98&plusmn;0.26&plusmn;0.01</td><td>16 &plusmn; 4</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12f</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.96&plusmn;0.40&plusmn;0.01 7.0 &plusmn; 2.8 2 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ

1 LEES 12f reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi_0(980) \to \phi\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.48 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.05 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Superseded by LEES 12f. AUBERT 07AK reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi_0(980) \to \phi\pi^0\pi^0) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.47 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.05 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\phi f_2(1270)) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{119/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.79&plusmn;0.32&plusmn;0.02</td><td>61</td><td>1,2,3 LEES</td><td>12f</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

4.08&plusmn;0.73&plusmn;0.05 0.14 44 2,4 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γ

1 LEES 12f reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi f_2(1270)) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(f_2(1270) \to \pi\pi)] = 1.51 \pm 0.25 \pm 0.10 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(f_2(1270) \to \pi\pi) = (84.3 \pm 2.8) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Using $B(\phi \to K^+K^-) = (48.9 \pm 0.5)\%$.

3 Using $\pi^+\pi^-$ invariant mass between 1.1 and 1.5 GeV. May include other sources such as $f_0(1370)$.

4 Superseded by LEES 12f. AUBERT 07AK reports $[\Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to \phi f_2(1270)) \times \Gamma(J/ψ(1S) \to e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(f_2(1270) \to \pi\pi)] = 3.44 \pm 0.55 \pm 0.28 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(f_2(1270) \to \pi\pi) = (84.3 \pm 2.8) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\phi f_2'(1525)) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{124/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.1&plusmn;3.2&plusmn;0.2</td><td>11</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>14H</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Dividing by 1/4 to take into account $B(f_2'(1525) \to K_0^S K_0^S) = 1/4$ $B(f_2'(1525) \to K\bar{K})$ and using $B(\phi \to K^+K^-) = (48.9 \pm 0.5)\%$.
²LEES 14H reports [Γ(J/ψ(1S) → φf'₂(1525)) × Γ(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(φ(1525) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)] = 7.2 ± 2.8 ± 0.3 eV which we divide by our best value B(f'₂(1525) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>) = (88.8 ± 2.2) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(\phi K^+ K^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{130\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
4.60 \pm 0.62 \pm 0.05 & 163 & 1 \text{ LEES} & 12\text{F} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow \\
& & & & K^+ K^- K^+ K^- \gamma
\end{array}
$$

¹LEES 12F reports [Γ(J/ψ(1S) → φK⁺K⁻) × Γ(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(φ(1020) → K⁺K⁻)] = 2.26 ± 0.26 ± 0.16 eV which we divide by our best value B(φ(1020) → K⁺K⁻) = (49.1 ± 0.5) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(\phi K_S^0 K_S^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{131\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
3.26 \pm 0.84 \pm 0.03 & 29 & 1 \text{ LEES} & 14\text{H} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow \\
& & & & K_S^0 K_S^0 K^+ K^- \gamma
\end{array}
$$

¹LEES 14H reports [Γ(J/ψ(1S) → φK⁰S K⁰S) × Γ(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(φ(1020) → K⁺K⁻)] = 1.6 ± 0.4 ± 0.1 eV which we divide by our best value B(φ(1020) → K⁺K⁻) = (49.1 ± 0.5) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(f'_2(1525) K^+ K^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{136\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
5.8 \pm 1.9 \pm 0.1 & 16 & 1.2 \text{ LEES} & 14\text{H} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow K_S^0 K_S^0 K^+ K^- \gamma
\end{array}
$$

¹Dividing by 1/4 to take into account B(f'₂(1525) → K⁰S K⁰S) = 1/4 B(f'₂(1525) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>).

²LEES 14H reports [Γ(J/ψ(1S) → f'₂(1525) K⁺K⁻) × Γ(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(f'₂(1525) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)] = 5.12 ± 1.68 ± 0.20 eV which we divide by our best value B(f'₂(1525) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>) = (88.8 ± 2.2) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(2(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{157\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
303 \pm 5 \pm 18 & 4990 & \text{AUBERT} & 07\text{AU} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0\gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(\pi^+\pi^- 3\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{159\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
100 \pm 50 & \text{OUR AVERAGE} & & & \\
\text{Error includes scale factor of 4.3.}
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
55 \pm 16 \pm 1 & 14k & 1 \text{ LEES} & 21 & \text{BABR} \\
150.0 \pm 4.0 \pm 15.0 & 2.3 & \text{LEES} & 18\text{E} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^- 3\pi^0\gamma
\end{array}
$$

¹LEES 21 reports [Γ(J/ψ(1S) → π⁺π⁻ 3π⁰) × Γ(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [Γ(ψ(2S) → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] = 19.2 ± 4.5 ± 3.2 eV which we divide by our best value Γ(ψ(2S) → J/ψ(1S)π⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> = 0.3469 ± 0.0034. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(\pi^+\pi^- 4\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{162\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
35.8 \pm 4.4 \pm 5.4 & 340 & \text{LEES} & 21\text{C} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & e^+ e^- \rightarrow \gamma_{ISR}(\pi^+\pi^- 4\pi^0)
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(\rho^\mp \pi^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{160\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
78.0 \pm 9.0 \pm 8.0 & 1.2\text{k} & \text{LEES} & 18\text{E} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^- 3\pi^0\gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(\rho^+ \rho^- \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{161\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
33.0 \pm 5.0 \pm 3.3 & 529 & \text{LEES} & 18\text{E} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^- 3\pi^0\gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{163\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\
0.1248 \pm 0.0019 \pm 0.0026 & \text{LEES} & 21\text{B} & \text{BABR} & 10.5 e^+ e^- \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\gamma \\
\text{• • •} & & & & \\
0.122 \pm 0.005 \pm 0.008 & \text{AUBERT,B} & 04\text{N} & \text{BABR} & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\gamma
\end{array}
$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(2(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)) \times \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{164\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (10}^{-2}\text{keV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
8.9 \pm 0.5 \pm 1.0 & 761 & \text{AUBERT} & 06\text{D} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)\gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0 K^- K^+) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{165\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
107.0 \pm 4.3 \pm 6.4 & 768 & \text{AUBERT} & 07\text{AU} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow K^- K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0 \gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(2(\pi^+\pi^-)) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{167\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
20.4 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.4 & \text{LEES} & 12\text{E} & \text{BABR} & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow 2\pi^+ 2\pi^- \gamma \\
\text{• • •} & & & & \\
19.5 \pm 1.4 \pm 1.3 & 270 & 1 \text{ AUBERT} & 05\text{D} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-)\gamma
\end{array}
$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹Superseded by LEES 12e.

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(3(\pi^+\pi^-)) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{168\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (10}^{-2}\text{keV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
2.37 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.14 & 496 & \text{AUBERT} & 06\text{D} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow 3(\pi^+\pi^-)\gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(2(\pi^+\pi^-)3\pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{169\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
345 \pm 10 \pm 50 & 14k & \text{LEES} & 21 & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-)3\pi^0\gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(2(\pi^+\pi^-)\eta) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{171\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
13.1 \pm 2.4 \pm 0.1 & 85 & 1 \text{ AUBERT} & 07\text{AU} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-)\eta\gamma
\end{array}
$$

¹AUBERT 07AU reports [Γ(J/ψ(1S) → 2(π⁺π⁻)η) × Γ(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(η → 2γ)] = 5.16 ± 0.85 ± 0.39 eV which we divide by our best value B(η → 2γ) = (39.36 ± 0.18) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(2(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)\eta) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{173\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
9.1 \pm 2.6 \pm 1.4 & 14k & \text{LEES} & 21 & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-)3\pi^0\gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0\eta) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{174\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
13.1 \pm 2.7 & \text{OUR AVERAGE} & & & \\
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
26.1 \pm 17.9 \pm 0.3 & 14k & 1 \text{ LEES} & 21 & \text{BABR} \\
12.8 \pm 1.8 \pm 2.0 & 203 & \text{LEES} & 18\text{E} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0\eta\gamma
\end{array}
$$

¹LEES 21 reports [Γ(J/ψ(1S) → π⁺π⁻π^0π^0η) × Γ(J/ψ(1S) → e⁺e⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(η → π⁺π⁻π^0)] = 6 ± 4 ± 1 eV which we divide by our best value B(η → π⁺π⁻π^0) = (23.02 ± 0.25) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(\rho^\mp \pi^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{175\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
10.5 \pm 4.1 \pm 1.6 & 168 & \text{LEES} & 18\text{E} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & 10.6 e^+ e^- \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0\eta\gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(K^+ K^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{176\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
& & & &
\end{array}
$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
1.78 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.05 \qquad 462 \qquad 1 \text{ LEES} \qquad 15\text{J} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \rightarrow K^+ K^- \gamma
$$

$$
1.94 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.05 \qquad 462 \qquad 2 \text{ LEES} \qquad 15\text{J} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \rightarrow K^+ K^- \gamma
$$

$$
1.42 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.08 \qquad 51 \qquad 3 \text{ LEES} \qquad 13\text{Q} \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \rightarrow K^+ K^- \gamma
$$

¹sinφ > 0.

²sinφ < 0.

³Interference with non-resonant K⁺K⁻ production not taken into account.

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{182\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
11.4 \pm 1.3 \pm 0.6 & 182 & \text{LEES} & 17\text{A} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & e^+ e^- \rightarrow K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^0\gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K^0 + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{183\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
6.7 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.4 & 106 & \text{LEES} & 17\text{A} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & e^+ e^- \rightarrow K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^0\gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(K_S^0 (1430)^0 K^0 + \text{c.c.} \rightarrow K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{184\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{EVTS} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\
2.4 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.1 & 37 & \text{LEES} & 17\text{A} & \text{BABR} \\
& & & & e^+ e^- \rightarrow K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^0\gamma
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(K_S^0 K^*(892)^0 \pi^+ \pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{201\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\
9.45 \pm 3.15 \pm 0.90 & \text{LEES} & 23 & \text{BABR} & e^+ e^- \rightarrow \gamma_{ISR} \text{hadrons}
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(K_S^0 K^*(892)^0 \pi^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{202\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\
5.59 \pm 0.79 \pm 0.55 & \text{LEES} & 23 & \text{BABR} & e^+ e^- \rightarrow \gamma_{ISR} \text{hadrons}
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(K^\mp K^*(892)^\pm \pi^0 \pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{203\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\
18.6 \pm 6.3 \pm 1.8 & \text{LEES} & 23 & \text{BABR} & e^+ e^- \rightarrow \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(K^\mp K^*(892)^\pm \pi^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{205\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\
8.67 \pm 1.56 \pm 0.84 & \text{LEES} & 23 & \text{BABR} & e^+ e^- \rightarrow \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(K^*(892)^\pm K^*(892)^0 \pi^\mp) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{204\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\
26.6 \pm 4.5 \pm 2.7 & \text{LEES} & 23 & \text{BABR} & e^+ e^- \rightarrow \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{lcccc}
\Gamma(K^*(892)^+ K^*(892)^0 \pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \Gamma_{206\text{Γ}/\Gamma} & & & \\
\text{VALUE (eV)} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\
62.1 \pm 10.8 \pm 6.30 & \text{LEES} & 23 & \text{BABR} & e^+ e^- \rightarrow \gamma_{ISR} \text{ hadrons}
\end{array}
$$
$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}) \times \Gamma(e^{+}e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{185}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>37.94±0.81±1.10</td><td>3.1k</td><td>LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>36.3 ±1.3 ±2.1</td><td>1.5k</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AK</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>33.6 ±2.7 ±2.7</td><td>233</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05D</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Superseded by LEES 12f.

²Superseded by AUBERT 07AK.

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{0}\pi^{0}) \times \Gamma(e^{+}e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{186}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.75±0.81±0.90</td><td>388</td><td>LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>13.6 ±1.1 ±1.3</td><td>203</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AK</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Superseded by LEES 12f.

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{0}\pi^{0}) \times \Gamma(e^{+}e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{187}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.9±1.3±0.9</td><td></td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ<sub>ISR</sub> hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm \pi^+ \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{188}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>29.3±2.6±2.9</td><td></td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ<sub>ISR</sub> hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm \pi^+ \pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{189}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>34.6±1.4±1.8</td><td></td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ<sub>ISR</sub> hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^+ \pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{191}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>20.8±2.3±2.1</td><td>248</td><td>LEES</td><td>14H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>L</sub><sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K_L^0 \pi^0 \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{192}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.3±2.3±0.5</td><td>47</td><td>LEES</td><td>17A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>L</sub><sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K_L^0 \eta) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{193}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.0±1.8±0.4</td><td>45</td><td>LEES</td><td>17A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>L</sub><sup>0</sup>ηγ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{194}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.3±0.9±0.5</td><td>133</td><td>LEES</td><td>14H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^\mp K_S^0 \pi^\pm \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{195}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>31.7±1.9±1.8</td><td>393</td><td>LEES</td><td>17D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>±</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm \rho(770) \pm \pi^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{190}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>16.0±4.1±1.6</td><td></td><td>LEES</td><td>23</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ<sub>ISR</sub> hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-}2(\pi^{+}\pi^{-})) \times \Gamma(e^{+}e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{197}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-2</sup> keV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.75±0.23±0.17</td><td>205</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06D</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\eta) \times \Gamma(e^{+}e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{198}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>25.9±3.9±0.1</td><td>73</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AU</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>ηγ</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT 07AU reports $[\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \to K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-) \times \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\eta \to 2\gamma)] = 10.2 \pm 1.3 \pm 0.8 \text{ eV which we divide by our best value B}(\eta \to 2\gamma) = (39.36 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(2(K^{+}K^{-})) \times \Gamma(e^{+}e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{199}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.00±0.33±0.29</td><td>287 ± 24</td><td>LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>)γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.11±0.39±0.30</td><td>156 ± 15</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AK</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>)γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.0 ±0.7 ±0.6</td><td>38</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05D</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>)γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Superseded by LEES 12f.

²Superseded by AUBERT 07AK.

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-}K_S^0 K_S^0) \times \Gamma(e^{+}e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{200}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.3±0.4±0.1</td><td>29</td><td>LEES</td><td>14H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}) \times \Gamma(e^{+}e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{207}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.9±0.6 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.8. See the ideogram below.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>11.3±0.4±0.3</td><td>821</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>130</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → p\bar{p}\gamma</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>12.9±0.4±0.4</td><td>918</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>13Y</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → p\bar{p}\gamma</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>9.7±1.7</td><td></td><td>3 ARMSTRONG</td><td>93B</td><td>E760</td><td>p\bar{p} → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>12.0±0.6±0.5</td><td>438</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>06B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → p\bar{p}\gamma</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ISR photon reconstructed in the detector

²ISR photon undetected

³Using $\Gamma_{\text{total}} = 85.5^{+6.1}_{-5.8}$ MeV.

⁴Superseded by LEES 130

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
11.9±0.6 (Error scaled by 1.8)

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

<figure><img src="image_645.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\lambda\bar{\lambda}) \times \Gamma(e^{+}e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{223}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.7±0.9±0.7</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BD</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → λ\bar{λ}\gamma</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma^+\Sigma^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{233}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.8±1.5±0.8</td><td></td><td>GONG</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Σ<sup>+</sup>Σ<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.2±1.5±0.6</td><td>GONG</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6.4±1.2±0.6</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Σ<sup>0</sup>Σ<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma^0\Sigma^0) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{234}5/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (eV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.0±0.1±0.1</td><td></td><td>1 LIAO</td><td>23</td><td>RVUE e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.135 ±0.003</td><td>2,3 SETH</td><td>04</td><td>RVUE</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.17 ±0.02</td><td>2 BOYARSKI</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.135 ±0.003</td><td>2,3 SETH</td><td>04</td><td>RVUE</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.17 ±0.02</td><td>2 BOYARSKI</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

J/ψ(1S) BRANCHING RATIOS

For the first four branching ratios, see also the partial widths, and (partial widths) $\times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ above.

$$ \Gamma(\text{hadrons})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{1/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.877±0.005 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.878±0.005</td><td>BAI</td><td>95B</td><td>BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.86 ±0.02</td><td>BOYARSKI</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.86 ±0.02</td><td>BOYARSKI</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\text{virtual} \gamma \to \text{hadrons})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{2/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.1346±0.0007</td><td></td><td>1 LIAO</td><td>23</td><td>RVUE e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.135 ±0.003</td><td>2,3 SETH</td><td>04</td><td>RVUE</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.17 ±0.02</td><td>2 BOYARSKI</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Using B(J/ψ(1S) → $\ell^+\ell^-$) = (5.967 ± 0.023)% and R = 2.26 ± 0.01 determined by a fit to data from Mark-I, DM2, BESII, KEDR, and BESIII.

²Included in $\Gamma(\text{hadrons})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$.

³Using B(J/ψ → $\ell^+\ell^-$) = (5.90 ± 0.09)% from RPP-2002 and R = 2.28 ± 0.04 determined by a fit to data from BAI 00 and BAI 02c. Superseded by LIAO 23.

$$ \Gamma(gg)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{3/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>64.1±1.0</td><td>6 M</td><td>1 BESSON</td><td>08</td><td>CLEO ψ(2S) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> + hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Calculated using the value $\Gamma(\gamma g g)/\Gamma(g g g) = 0.137 \pm 0.001 \pm 0.016 \pm 0.004$ from BESSON 08 and the PDG 08 values of B($\ell^+\ell^-$), B(virtual $\gamma \to$ hadrons), and B($\gamma\eta_c$). The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of $\Gamma(\gamma g g)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ measurement of BESSON 08.
$\Gamma(\gamma gg)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.79±1.05</td><td>200 k</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_4/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 BESSON</td><td>08</td><td>CLEO ψ(2S) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ + hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(\gamma gg)/\Gamma(ggg)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>13.7±0.1±0.7</td><td>6 M</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_4/\Gamma_3$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BESSON</td><td>08</td><td>CLEO ψ(2S) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> J/ψ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)

5.971±0.032 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.983±0.007±0.037</td><td>720k</td></tr><tr><td>5.945±0.067±0.042</td><td>15k</td></tr><tr><td>5.90 ±0.05 ±0.10</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6.09 ±0.33</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.92 ±0.15 ±0.20</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6.9 ±0.9</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_5/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13R</td><td>BES3 ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>LI</td><td>05C</td><td>CLEO ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>BAI</td><td>98D</td><td>BES ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>BAI</td><td>95B</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>COFFMAN</td><td>92</td><td>MRK3 ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>BOYARSKI</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)

0.89±1.3±0.4

$\Gamma_6/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 ARMSTRONG</td><td>96</td><td>E760 ρp → e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(\mu^+ \mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)

5.961±0.033 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.973±0.007±0.038</td><td>770k</td></tr><tr><td>5.960±0.065±0.050</td><td>17k</td></tr><tr><td>5.84 ±0.06 ±0.10</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6.08 ±0.33</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.90 ±0.15 ±0.19</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6.9 ±0.9</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_7/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13R</td><td>BES3 ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>LI</td><td>05C</td><td>CLEO ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>BAI</td><td>98D</td><td>BES ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>BAI</td><td>95B</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>COFFMAN</td><td>92</td><td>MRK3 ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>BOYARSKI</td><td>75</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma(\mu^+ \mu^-)$

VALUE

1.0016±0.0031 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.0022±0.0044±0.0048</td><td>1 AULCHENKO 14 KEDR</td></tr><tr><td>1.0017±0.0017±0.0033</td><td>2 ABLIKIM 13R BES3 ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.002 ±0.021 ±0.013</td><td>3 ANASHIN 10 KEDR</td></tr><tr><td>0.997 ±0.012 ±0.006</td><td>LI 05C CLEO ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.011 ±0.013 ±0.016</td><td>BAI 98D BES ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.00 ±0.07</td><td>BAI 95B BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.00 ±0.05</td><td>BOYARSKI 75 MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.91 ±0.15</td><td>ESPOSITO 75B FRAM e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.93 ±0.10</td><td>FORD 75 SPEC e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_5/\Gamma_7$

## HADRONIC DECAYS

$\Gamma(\rho\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)

1.88 ±0.12 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.072±0.017±0.062</td><td>19.8k</td></tr><tr><td>2.18 ±0.19</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.184±0.005±0.201</td><td>220k</td></tr><tr><td>2.091±0.021±0.116</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.21 ±0.20</td><td>BAI 96D BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ρπ</td></tr><tr><td>1.42 ±0.01 ±0.19</td><td>COFFMAN 88 MRK3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.3 ±0.3</td><td>FRANKLIN 83 MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.6 ±0.4</td><td>ALEXANDER 78 PLUT e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.33 ±0.21</td><td>BRANDELIK 78B DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.0 ±0.2</td><td>BARTEL 76 CNTR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.3 ±0.3</td><td>JEAN-MARIE 76 MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_8/\Gamma$

Error includes scale factor of 2.6. See the ideogram below.

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>23 KEDR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.3 AUBERT, B</td><td>04N BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr><tr><td>3.4 BAI</td><td>04H BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3.5 BAI</td><td>04H BES ψ(2S) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> J/ψ</td></tr><tr><td>BAI</td><td>96D BES e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → ρπ</td></tr><tr><td>COFFMAN</td><td>88 MRK3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>FRANKLIN</td><td>83 MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>78 PLUT e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>BRANDELIK</td><td>78B DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>BARTEL</td><td>76 CNTR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>BARTEL</td><td>76 CNTR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>JEAN-MARIE</td><td>76 MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.88±0.12 (Error scaled by 2.6)

<figure><img src="image_646.png" /></figure>

$\Gamma(\rho\pi)/\Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.142±0.011±0.026</td><td>20k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17C</td><td>BABR $J/\psi \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1.331±0.033 20k 2 LEES 17C BABR $J/\psi \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$

$\Gamma(\rho^0\pi^0)/\Gamma(\rho\pi)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.328±0.005±0.027</td><td>88</td><td>COFFMAN</td><td>MRK3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.35 ±0.08</td><td>ALEXANDER 78 PLUT e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.32 ±0.08</td><td>BRANDELIK 78B DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.39 ±0.11</td><td>BARTEL 76 CNTR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.37 ±0.09</td><td>JEAN-MARIE 76 MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_8/\Gamma_{163}$

$\Gamma(\rho^+ K^+ K^- \pi^- + c.c. \rightarrow K^+ K^- \pi^- \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.53±0.16±0.81</td><td>485</td><td>ANASHIN</td><td>22</td><td>KEDR $J/\psi \rightarrow K^+ K^- \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_9/\Gamma_8$

$\Gamma(a_2(1320)^0 \pi^+ \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.84±0.08±0.60</td><td>1317</td><td>ANASHIN</td><td>22</td><td>KEDR $J/\psi \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{10}/\Gamma$

$\Gamma(a_2(1320)^+ \pi^- \pi^0 + c.c. \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.67±0.09±0.73</td><td>1628</td><td>ANASHIN</td><td>22</td><td>KEDR $J/\psi \rightarrow 2(\pi^+\pi^-)\pi^0$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{11}/\Gamma$

$\Gamma(a_2(1320)\rho)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.9±2.2 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>11.7±0.7±2.5</td><td>7584</td><td>AUGUSTIN</td><td>89</td><td>DM2 $J/\psi \rightarrow \rho^0\rho^\pm\pi\mp$</td></tr><tr><td>8.4±4.5</td><td>36</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{12}/\Gamma$

$\Gamma(\eta\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.78±0.68</td><td>471</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>19Q</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → \eta\pi^+\pi^-</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{13}/\Gamma$

$\Gamma(\eta\rho)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.193±0.023 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.194±0.017±0.029</td><td>299</td><td>JOUSSET</td><td>90</td><td>DM2 $J/\psi \rightarrow \text{hadrons}$</td></tr><tr><td>0.193±0.013±0.029</td><td></td><td>COFFMAN</td><td>88</td><td>MRK3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → \pi<sup>+</sup>\pi<sup>-</sup>\eta</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(\eta\phi(2170) \rightarrow \eta\phi f_0(980) \rightarrow \eta\phi\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.20±0.14±0.37</td><td>471</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>15H</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → \phi\eta\pi^+\pi^-</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{17}/\Gamma$

$\Gamma(\eta\phi(2170) \rightarrow \eta K^*(892)^0 K^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.52 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>10C</td><td>BES2 $J/\psi \rightarrow \eta K^+\pi^- K^-\pi^+$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{18}/\Gamma$

$\Gamma(\eta K^\pm K^0\pi^\mp)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>21.8±2.2±3.4</td><td>232 ± 23</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>08E</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_{20}/\Gamma$

<footnote n="1">¹Calculated using the value $\Gamma(\gamma gg)/\Gamma(ggg) = 0.137 \pm 0.001 \pm 0.016 \pm 0.004$ from BESSON 08 and the value of $\Gamma(ggg)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of $\Gamma(ggg)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ measurement of BESSON 08.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹For $E_γ > 100$ MeV.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹From 235.3k $J/\psi \rightarrow e^+e^-$ and 156.6k $J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-$ observed events.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Not independent of the corresponding measurements of $\Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ and $\Gamma(\mu+\mu-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Not independent of the corresponding measurements of $\Gamma(e^+ e^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ and $\Gamma(\mu^+ \mu^-) \times \Gamma(e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹By a simultaneous fit of the $\pi\pi$ invariant mass distribution over the decay modes $J/\psi \rightarrow \rho^0\pi^0$, $J/\psi \rightarrow \rho^+\pi^-$, $J/\psi \rightarrow \rho^-\pi^+$. In the fit only the intermediate states $\rho(770)\pi$ and $\rho(1450)\pi$ are considered.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²From the ratio of $\Gamma(e^+e^-) B(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)$ and $\Gamma(e^+e^-) B(\mu^+\mu^-)$ (AUBERT 04).</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Not independent of their $B(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)$.</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴From $J/\psi \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ events directly.</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵Obtained comparing the rates for $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ and $\mu^+\mu^-$, using $J/\psi$ events produced via $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi$ and with $B(J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-) = 5.88 \pm 0.10\%$.</footnote>

<footnote>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²From a Dalitz plot analysis in a Veneziano model.</footnote>

<footnote>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹From an energy scan of $e^+e^- \rightarrow J/\psi \rightarrow \eta\pi^+\pi^-$ assuming PDG 16 values for $\Gamma(e^+e^-)$, $\Gamma(\mu^+\mu^-)$, and $\Gamma(\rho\pi^0)$.</footnote>
Γ(ηK*(892)⁰K*(892)⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>21</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.15±0.13±0.22</td><td>209</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>10c</td><td>BES2 J/ψ → ηK<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(ρη'(958))/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>22</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>8.1 ±0.8</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td>Error Includes scale factor of 1.6.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>7.90±0.19±0.49</td><td>3476</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>17AK BES3</td><td>J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>η'</td></tr><tr><td>8.3 ±3.0 ±1.2</td><td>19</td><td>JOUSSET</td><td>90 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>11.4 ±1.4 ±1.6</td><td></td><td>COFFMAN</td><td>88 MRK3</td><td>J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>η'</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a partial wave analysis of the decay J/ψ → π⁺π⁻η'.

Γ(ρ(1450)π → π⁺π⁻π⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>30</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.2±0.2±1.1</td><td>19.8k</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>23</td><td>KEDR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ By a simultaneous fit of the ππ invariant mass distribution over the decay modes J/ψ → ρ⁰π⁰, J/ψ → ρ⁺π⁻, J/ψ → ρ⁻π⁺. In the fit only the intermediate states ρ(770)π and ρ(1450)π are considered.

Γ(ρ(1450)π → π⁺π⁻π⁰)/Γ(π⁺π⁻π⁰) Γ<sub>30</sub>/Γ<sub>163</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>10.9 ±1.7 ±2.7</td><td>20k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.80±0.27</td><td>20k</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.

² From a Dalitz plot analysis in a Veneziano model.

Γ(ρ(1450)±π∓ → K⁰S K±π∓)/Γ(K⁰S K±π∓) Γ<sub>31</sub>/Γ<sub>181</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.3±0.8±0.6</td><td>4k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR J/ψ → K⁰S K±π∓</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.

Γ(ρ(1450)⁰π → K⁺K⁻π⁰)/Γ(K⁺K⁻π⁰) Γ<sub>32</sub>/Γ<sub>180</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.3±2.0±0.6</td><td>2k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR J/ψ → K⁺K⁻π⁰</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.

Γ(ρ(1450)η'(958) → π⁺π⁻η'(958))/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>33</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.28±0.55±0.44</td><td>119</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>17AK BES3</td><td>J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>η'</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a partial wave analysis of the decay J/ψ → π⁺π⁻η'.

Γ(ρ(1700)π → π⁺π⁻π⁰)/Γ(π⁺π⁻π⁰) Γ<sub>35</sub>/Γ<sub>163</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8±2±5</td><td>20k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>22±6</td><td>20k</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.

² From a Dalitz plot analysis in a Veneziano model.

Γ(ρ(2150)π → π⁺π⁻π⁰)/Γ(π⁺π⁻π⁰) Γ<sub>37</sub>/Γ<sub>163</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4±1±20</td><td>20k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>600±250</td><td>20k</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.

² From a Dalitz plot analysis in a Veneziano model.

Γ(ρ<sub>3</sub>(1690)π → π⁺π⁻π⁰)/Γ(π⁺π⁻π⁰) Γ<sub>38</sub>/Γ<sub>163</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>4.0±0.8</td><td>20k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in a Veneziano model.

Γ(ωπ⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>39</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.45 ±0.05 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.4.</td><td></td><td>See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>0.538 ±0.012 ±0.065</td><td>2090</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>06F BES2</td><td>J/ψ → ωπ⁰</td></tr><tr><td>0.360 ±0.028 ±0.054</td><td>222</td><td>JOUSSET</td><td>90 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>0.482 ±0.019 ±0.064</td><td></td><td>COFFMAN</td><td>88 MRK3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π⁰π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π⁰</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Using B(ω → π⁺π⁻π⁰) = (89.1 ± 0.7)%.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.45±0.05 (Error scaled by 1.4)

<figure><img src="image_647.png" /></figure>

Γ(ωπ⁰ → π⁺π⁻π⁰)/Γ(π⁺π⁻π⁰) Γ<sub>40</sub>/Γ<sub>163</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8±3±2</td><td>20k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model and significance 4.9 σ.

Γ(ωπ⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>41</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>8.5±1.0</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td>Error Includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>10.6±1.2±0.1</td><td>3531</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>22 KEDR</td><td>J/ψ → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>7.0±1.6</td><td>18058</td><td>AUGUSTIN</td><td>89 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>7.8±1.6</td><td>215</td><td>BURMESTER</td><td>77D PLUT</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>6.8±1.9</td><td>348</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ ANASHIN 22 reports [Γ(J/ψ(1S) → ωπ⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> × [B(ω(782) → π⁺π⁻π⁰)] = (0.946 ± 0.016 ± 0.108) × 10⁻² which we divide by our best value B(ω(782) → π⁺π⁻π⁰) = (89.2 ± 0.7) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
8.5±1.0 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_648.png" /></figure>

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

Γ(ωπ⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>42</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.4±0.3±0.7</td><td>509</td><td>AUGUSTIN</td><td>89 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>3π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(ωf₂(1270))/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>44</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.3±0.6 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.3±0.2±0.6</td><td>5860</td><td>AUGUSTIN</td><td>89 DM2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>4.0±1.6</td><td>70</td><td>BURMESTER</td><td>77D PLUT</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.9±0.8</td><td>81</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>
$$ \Gamma(\omega\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{45}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.74 &pm; 0.20</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>2.352 &pm; 0.273</td><td>5k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>06F BES2</td><td>J/ψ → ωη</td></tr><tr><td>1.44 &pm; 0.40</td><td>± 0.14</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>06D BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → ωηγ</td></tr><tr><td>1.43 &pm; 0.10</td><td>± 0.21</td><td>JOUSSET</td><td>90 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>1.71 &pm; 0.08</td><td>± 0.20</td><td>COFFMAN</td><td>88 MRK3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → 3πη</td></tr></tbody></table>

Error includes scale factor of 1.6.

¹ Using B(η → 2γ) = (39.43 ± 0.26)%, B(η → π⁺π⁻π⁰) = 22.6 ± 0.4%, B(η → π⁺π⁻γ) = 4.68 ± 0.11%, and B(ω → π⁺π⁻π⁰) = (89.1 ± 0.7)%.

² Using $\Gamma(J/\psi \to e^+e^-) = 5.52 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.04$ keV.

<figure><img src="image_649.png" /><figcaption>WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.74±0.20 (Error scaled by 1.6)</figcaption></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\omega\pi^+\pi^-\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{48}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>05 ± 34</td><td>140</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → 3(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>



$$ \Gamma(\omega\eta'\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{50}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.12 ± 0.02</td><td>± 0.13</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>19AC BES3</td><td>J/ψ → ωη'/π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>



¹ Using the decays $\omega \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ and $\eta' \to \eta\pi^+\pi^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\omega\eta'(958))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{51}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.89 ± 0.18</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.08 ± 0.30</td><td>± 0.14</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>17AK BES3</td><td>J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>η'</td></tr><tr><td>2.26 ± 0.43</td><td>218</td><td>2 ABLIKIM</td><td>06F BES2</td><td>J/ψ → ωη'</td></tr><tr><td>1.8 ± 1.0</td><td>± 0.3</td><td>JOUSSET</td><td>90 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>1.66 ± 0.17</td><td>± 0.19</td><td>COFFMAN</td><td>88 MRK3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → 3πη'</td></tr></tbody></table>



¹ From a partial wave analysis of the decay $J/\psi \to \pi^+\pi^-\eta'$.

² Using $B(\eta' \to \pi^+\pi^-\eta') = (44.3 \pm 1.5)\%$, $B(\eta' \to \pi^+\pi^-\gamma) = 29.5 \pm 1.0\%$, $B(\eta \to 2\gamma) = 39.43 \pm 0.26\%$, and $B(\omega \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) = (89.1 \pm 0.7)\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\omega f_0(980))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{52}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.41 ± 0.27</td><td>± 0.47</td><td>1 AUGUSTIN</td><td>89 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>



¹ Assuming $B(f_0(980) \to \pi\pi) = 0.78$.

$$ \Gamma(\omega f_0(1710) \to \omega K\bar{K})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{53}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.8 ± 1.1</td><td>± 0.3</td><td>1.2 FALVARD</td><td>88 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>



¹ Includes unknown branching fraction $f_0(1710) \to K\bar{K}$.

² Addition of $f_0(1710) \to K^+K^-$ and $f_0(1710) \to K^0\bar{K}^0$ branching ratios.

$$ \Gamma(\omega f_1(1420))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{54}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.8 + 1.9</td><td>± 1.6</td><td>111 + 31</td><td>87</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>



$$ \Gamma(\omega f'_2(1525))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{55}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.2 x 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 VANNUCCI</td><td>77 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<2.8 x 10⁻⁴ 90 1 FALVARD 88 DM2 J/ψ → hadrons

¹ Re-evaluated assuming $B(f'_2(1525) \to K\bar{K}) = 0.713$.

$$ \Gamma(\omega X(1835) \to \omega p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{56}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.9 x 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>95</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13P BES3</td><td>J/ψ → γπ<sup>0</sup> pπ<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>



$$ \Gamma(\omega X(1835), X \to \eta'\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{57}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.2 x 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>19AC BES3</td><td>J/ψ → ωη'π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Using the decays $\omega \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ and $\eta' \to \eta\pi^+\pi^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\omega K^+ K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{58}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.52 ± 0.30</td><td>± 0.01</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>22 KEDR</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ ANASHIN 22 reports $[\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \to \omega K^+ K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0)] = (0.136 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.026) \times 10^{-2}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\omega K^\pm K^0 S \pi^\mp)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{59}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>34 ± 5</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>37.7 ± 0.8</td><td>± 5.8</td><td>1972</td><td>± 41</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>29.5 ± 1.4</td><td>± 7.0</td><td>879</td><td>± 41</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>



$$ \Gamma(\omega K\bar{K})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{60}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>19 ± 4</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>19.8 ± 2.1</td><td>± 3.9</td><td>1 FALVARD</td><td>88 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>16 ± 10</td><td>± 22</td><td>FELDMAN</td><td>77 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>



¹ Addition of $\omega K^+ K^-$ and $\omega K^0\bar{K}^0$ branching ratios.

$$ \Gamma(\omega K^*(892)\bar{K} + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{61}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>61 ± 9</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>62.0 ± 6.8</td><td>± 10.6</td><td>899</td><td>± 98</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>65.3 ± 10.2</td><td>± 13.5</td><td>176</td><td>± 28</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>53 ± 14</td><td>± 14</td><td>530</td><td>± 140</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>



$$ \Gamma(\eta' K^\pm K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{62}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.48 ± 0.13</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.50 ± 0.02</td><td>± 0.19</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>18AB BES3</td><td>J/ψ → ωK<sup>0</sup>S K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>±</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.47 ± 0.03</td><td>± 0.17</td><td>2 ABLIKIM</td><td>18AB BES3</td><td>J/ψ → η' K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>



¹ From $\eta' K^+ K^-$ and $\eta' K^0\bar{K}^0$.

² From $\eta' K^0 S K^\pm\pi^\mp$.

$$ \Gamma(\eta' K^0\bar{K} + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{63}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.66 ± 0.03</td><td>± 0.21</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>18AB BES3</td><td>J/ψ → η' K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>



$$ \Gamma(\eta' h_1(1415) \to \eta' K^+ K^- + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{64}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.16 ± 0.12</td><td>± 0.29</td><td>1.1k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>J/ψ → η' h<sub>1</sub> → η' K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>



$$ \Gamma(\eta' h_1(1415) \to \eta' K^\pm K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{65}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.51 ± 0.09</td><td>± 0.21</td><td>1.0k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>J/ψ → η' h<sub>1</sub> → η' K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>



¹ From $\eta' K^+ K^-$ and $\eta' K^0\bar{K}^0$.

$$ \Gamma(\eta' h_1(1415) \to \gamma\eta'\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{66}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.69 ± 0.80</td><td>± 0.74</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>22C BES3</td><td>J/ψ → γη'η' → 4/5γ2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table>



¹ From a partial wave analysis of the systems $(\gamma X)$, with $X \to \eta'\eta'$, and $(\eta' X)$, with $X \to \eta'\eta'$ in the decay $J/\psi \to \gamma\eta'\eta'$. The intermediate $X$ is parametrized by a constant-width, relativistic Breit-Wigner.

$$ \Gamma(h_1(1415)\eta' \to \gamma\eta'\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{27}/\Gamma $$



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>0.08 ± 0.01</th><th>± 0.01</th><th>1 ABLIKIM</th><th>22AS BES3</th><th>J/ψ(1S) → γη'η'</th></tr></thead></table>

¹ From a Breit-Wigner fit involving 9 resonances and a resonating exotic $\eta_1(1855) \to \eta'\eta'$ P-wave.

$$ \Gamma(h_1(1595)\eta' \to \gamma\eta'\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{28}/\Gamma $$



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>0.16 ± 0.02</th><th>± 0.03</th><th>1 ABLIKIM</th><th>22AS BES3</th><th>J/ψ(1S) → γη'η'</th></tr></thead></table>

¹ From a Breit-Wigner fit involving 9 resonances and a resonating exotic $\eta_1(1855) \to \eta'\eta'$ P-wave.
$$ \Gamma(\bar{K}K^*(892)^+ + c.c. \rightarrow K_S^0 K^\pm \pi^\mp) / \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm \pi^\mp) \quad \Gamma_{68/\Gamma_{181}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>90.5±0.9±3.8</td><td>4k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.

$$ \Gamma(K^+ K^*(892)^- + c.c.)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{69/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

6.0 $^{+0.8}_{-1.0}$ OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.9. See the ideogram below.

<table><tbody><tr><td>8.07±0.04</td><td>+0.38</td><td>183k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19AQ BES</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>4.57±0.17±0.70</td><td>+0.61</td><td>2285</td><td>JOUSET</td><td>90 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>5.26±0.13±0.53</td><td></td><td></td><td>COFFMAN</td><td>88 MRK3</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.6 ± 0.6</td><td>24</td><td>FRANKLIN</td><td>83</td><td>MRK2</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3.2 ± 0.6</td><td>48</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>4.1 ± 1.2</td><td>39</td><td>BRAUNSCH...</td><td>76</td><td>DASP</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>±</sup> X</td></tr></tbody></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
6.0+0.8-1.0 (Error scaled by 2.9)

<figure><img src="image_650.png" /></figure>

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

$$ \Gamma(K^+ K^*(892)^- + c.c.)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-3}) $$

$$ \Gamma(K^+ K^*(892)^- + c.c. \rightarrow K^+ K^- \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{70/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.69±0.01</td><td>+0.13</td><td>183k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19AQ BES</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^+ K^*(892)^- + c.c. \rightarrow K^+ K^- \pi^0) / \Gamma(K^+ K^- \pi^0) \quad \Gamma_{70/\Gamma_{180}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>92.4±1.5±3.4</td><td>2k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.

$$ \Gamma(K^0 \bar{K}^*(892)^0 + c.c.)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{72/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.2 ± 0.4</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.96±0.15±0.60</td><td>1192</td><td>JOUSET</td><td>90 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>4.33±0.12±0.45</td><td></td><td>COFFMAN</td><td>88 MRK3</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{K}^*(892)^0 K^+ \pi^- + c.c.)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{74/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.73±0.14±0.82</td><td></td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>22 KEDR</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>• • •</td><td>seen</td><td>2 ABLIKIM</td><td>06C BES2</td><td>J/ψ → K*(892)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>Obtained from J/ψ → K*(892)K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> + c.c. → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> taking the value 2/3 for the probability of the K*(892)<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decay.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

²A K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>(700) is observed by ABLIKIM 06c in the K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> mass spectrum of the K*(892)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> final state against the K*(892). A corresponding branching fraction of the J/ψ(1S) is not presented.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K^- \pi^+ + c.c. \rightarrow K^+ K^- \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{78/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.81±0.10±0.54</td><td>1559</td><td>ANASHIN</td><td>22 KEDR</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K_S^0 \rightarrow \gamma K_S^0 K_S^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{79/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.28</td><td>+0.16+0.59</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>18AA BES3</td><td>J/ψ → γ K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^\pm K^*(700)^\mp) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{81/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.09±0.18</td><td>+0.94</td><td>655</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>10E BES2</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>±</sup> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \bar{K}^*(892)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{82/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5</td><td>90</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^\pm K^*(892)^\mp) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{83/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.00±0.19</td><td>+0.11</td><td>323</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>10E BES2</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>±</sup> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_1(1400)^\pm K^\mp) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{84/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.8±0.8±1.2</td><td></td><td>1 BAI</td><td>99c BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assuming B(K<sub>1</sub>(1400) → K<sup>*</sup>π<sup>0</sup>) = 0.94 ± 0.06

$$ \Gamma(K^*(1410) \bar{K} + c.c. \rightarrow K^\pm K^\mp \pi^0) / \Gamma(K^+ K^- \pi^0) \quad \Gamma_{86/\Gamma_{180}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.3±1.1±0.7</td><td>2k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(1410) \bar{K} + c.c. \rightarrow K_S^0 K^\pm \pi^\mp) / \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm \pi^\mp) \quad \Gamma_{87/\Gamma_{181}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.5±0.5±0.9</td><td>4k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.

$$ \Gamma(K_2^*(1430) \bar{K} + c.c. \rightarrow K^\pm K^\mp \pi^0) / \Gamma(K^+ K^- \pi^0) \quad \Gamma_{89/\Gamma_{180}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.5±1.3±0.9</td><td>2k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.

$$ \Gamma(K_2^*(1430) \bar{K} + c.c. \rightarrow K_S^0 K^\pm \pi^\mp) / \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm \pi^\mp) \quad \Gamma_{90/\Gamma_{181}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.1±1.3±1.2</td><td>4k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17c</td><td>BABR</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model.

$$ \Gamma(K_2^*(1430) K + c.c.)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{91/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;40 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> K<sup>2</sup><sub>2</sub>0</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;66 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>BRAUNSCH...</td><td>76</td><td>DASP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>±</sup> K<sup>2</sup><sub>2</sub>0</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_2^*(1430)^+ K^- + c.c. \rightarrow K^+ K^- \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{92/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.69±0.04</td><td>+0.25</td><td>183k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19AQ BES</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_2^*(1430)^0 K^*(892)^0 + c.c.)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{95/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>6.7±2.6</td><td>40</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_2^*(1430)^0 \bar{K}_2^*(1430)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{98/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;29 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_2^*(1980)^+ K^- + c.c. \rightarrow K^+ K^- \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{100/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.1±0.1</td><td>+0.6</td><td>183k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19AQ BES</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_4^*(2045)^+ K^- + c.c. \rightarrow K^+ K^- \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{101/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.2±0.7</td><td>+2.8</td><td>183k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19AQ BES</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_1(1270)^\pm K^\mp) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{102/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BAI</td><td>99c BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assuming B(K<sub>1</sub>(1270) → Kρ) = 0.42 ± 0.06

$$ \Gamma(K_1(1270) K_S^0 \rightarrow \gamma K_S^0 K_S^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{103/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.54</td><td>+1.07+2.35</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>18AA BES3</td><td>J/ψ → γ K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub></td></tr></tbody></table>
$$ \Gamma(\phi_2(1320)^{\pm} \pi^\mp)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{104}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;43 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BRAUNSCH...</td><td>76</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{105}/\Gamma $$

The two different fit values of ABLIKIM 15k below have the same statistical significance of 6.4 σ and cannot be distinguished at this moment.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.94 ± 0.16 ± 0.16</td><td>0.8k</td><td></td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>15k</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γγ</td></tr><tr><td>0.124 ± 0.033 ± 0.030</td><td>35 ± 9</td><td></td><td>2 ABLIKIM</td><td>15k</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>γγ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.4</td><td>90</td><td>3 ABLIKIM</td><td>05B BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → φγγ</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.8</td><td>90</td><td>COFFMAN</td><td>88</td><td>MRK3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Corresponding to one of the two fit solutions with δ = (-95.9 ± 1.5)° for the phase angle between the resonant J/ψ → φπ° and non-phi J/ψ → K+K-π° contributions.

²Corresponding to one of the two fit solutions with δ = (-152.1 ± 7.7)° for the phase angle between the resonant J/ψ → φπ° and non-phi J/ψ → K+K-π° contributions.

³Superseded by ABLIKIM 15k.

$$ \Gamma(\phi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{106}/\Gamma $$

$$ \Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-3}) \quad \text{EVTS} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.94 ± 0.15</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.7.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.09 ± 0.02 ± 0.13</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>05 BES2</td><td>J/ψ → φπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.78 ± 0.03 ± 0.12</td><td>FALVARD</td><td>88 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.1 ± 0.9</td><td>23 FELDMAN</td><td>77 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi(\pi^+\pi^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{108}/\Gamma $$

$$ \Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-4}) \quad \text{EVTS} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FALVARD</td><td>88</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{109}/\Gamma $$

$$ \Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-3}) \quad \text{EVTS} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.74 ± 0.06</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.71 ± 0.10 ± 0.05</td><td>99 ± 14</td><td>1 ZHU</td><td>23 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(nS) → φηγ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.898 ± 0.024 ± 0.089</td><td></td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>05B BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → hadr</td></tr><tr><td>0.64 ± 0.04 ± 0.11</td><td>346</td><td>JOUSSET</td><td>90 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>0.661 ± 0.045 ± 0.078</td><td></td><td>COFFMAN</td><td>88 MRK3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>η</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From a fit to the combined φη invariant mass spectrum with a Gaussian function for the J/ψ signals and a second-order polynomial function for the backgrounds.

$$ \Gamma(\phi\eta'(958))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{110}/\Gamma $$

$$ \Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-4}) \quad \text{EVTS} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.6 ± 0.5</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.2. See the ideogram below.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.10 ± 0.03 ± 0.32</td><td>31k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>16M BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.46 ± 0.31 ± 0.56</td><td></td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>05B BES2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.1 ± 0.3 ± 0.8</td><td>167</td><td>JOUSSET</td><td>90 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.08 ± 0.34 ± 0.36</td><td></td><td>COFFMAN</td><td>88 MRK3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>η</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 13</td><td>90</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE

4.6±0.5 (Error scaled by 2.2)

<figure><img src="image_651.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\phi\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{111}/\Gamma $$

$$ \Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-4}) \quad \text{EVTS} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.32 ± 0.06 ± 0.16</td><td>2.2k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>19AN BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → hadrons</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Including contributions from intermediate resonances. Evidence for an intermediate resonance at M ≈ 2 GeV and Γ ≈ 150 MeV decaying to φη' with J<sup>P</sup> = 1<sup>+</sup> or J<sup>P</sup> = 1<sup>-</sup>, and B(J/ψ → ηX) × B(X → φη') ≈ 10<sup>-4</sup>.

$$ \Gamma(\phi_0(980))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{112}/\Gamma $$

$$ \Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-4}) \quad \text{EVTS} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.2 ± 0.9</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.9.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.6 ± 0.4 ± 0.8</td><td></td><td>1 FALVARD</td><td>88 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>2.6 ± 0.6</td><td></td><td>1 GIDAL</td><td>81 MRK2</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>Assuming B(f<sub>0</sub>(980) → ππ) = 0.78.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi^0 f_0(980) \rightarrow \phi^0 \pi^+ \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{115}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.50 ± 0.80 ± 0.61</td><td>355</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>15P BES3</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>3π</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi^0 f_0(980) \rightarrow \phi^0 \rho^0 \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{116}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.67 ± 0.50 ± 0.24</td><td>70</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>15P BES3</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>3π</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi_0 f_0(980) \eta \rightarrow \eta \phi \pi^+ \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{117}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.23 ± 0.75 ± 0.73</td><td>52</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>08F BES</td><td>J/ψ → ηφf<sub>0</sub>(980)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi_0 a_0(980) \rightarrow \phi\eta\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{118}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.37 ± 1.35</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>18D BES3</td><td>J/ψ → φηπ<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.0 ± 2.7 ± 2.5</td><td>2 ABLIKIM</td><td>11D BES3</td><td>J/ψ → φηπ<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assuming constructive interference between a<sub>0</sub>(980) - f<sub>0</sub>(980) mixing and electromagnetic decay. Destructive interference gives a value of (4.93 ± 1.77) × 10<sup>-6</sup> for this branching fraction.

²Assuming a<sub>0</sub>(980) - f<sub>0</sub>(980) mixing and isospin breaking via γ* and K*K loops.

$$ \Gamma(\phi f_2(1270))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{119}/\Gamma $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 0.45</td><td>90</td><td>FALVARD</td><td>88 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 0.37</td><td>90</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77 MRK1</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi f_1(1285))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{120}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.6 ± 0.5</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.4 ± 1.8 ± 1.5</td><td>1.1k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>15H BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → φηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3.2 ± 0.6 ± 0.4</td><td></td><td>JOUSSET</td><td>90 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → φ2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td>2.1 ± 0.5 ± 0.4</td><td>25</td><td>2 JOUSSET</td><td>90 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → φηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.6 ± 0.2 ± 0.1</td><td>16 BECKER</td><td>87 MRK3</td><td>J/ψ → φK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ABLIKIM 15H reports [Γ(J/ψ(15) → φf<sub>1</sub>(1285))/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(f<sub>1</sub>(1285) → ηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)] = (1.20 ± 0.6 ± 0.14)×10<sup>-4</sup> which we divide by our best value B(f<sub>1</sub>(1285) → ηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>) = (35 ± 15) × 10<sup>-2</sup>. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²We attribute to the f<sub>1</sub>(1285) the signal observed in the π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>η invariant mass distribution at 1297 MeV.

$$ \Gamma(\phi f_1(1285) \rightarrow \phi \pi^0 f_0(980) \rightarrow \phi \pi^0 \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{121}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.36 ± 2.31 ± 1.54</td><td>78</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>15P BES3</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>3π</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi f_1(1285) \rightarrow \phi \pi^0 f_0(980) \rightarrow \phi 3\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{122}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.08 ± 1.63 ± 1.47</td><td>9</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>15P BES3</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>3π</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi\eta(1405) \rightarrow \phi\eta\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{123}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.01 ± 0.58 ± 0.82</td><td>172</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>15H BES3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → φηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 17</td><td>90</td><td>2 FALVARD</td><td>88 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹With 3.6 σ significance.

²Includes unknown branching fraction η(1405) → ηππ.

$$ \Gamma(\phi f_2'(1525))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{124}/\Gamma $$

$$ \Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-4}) \quad \text{EVTS} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8 ± 4</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.7.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>12.3 ± 0.6 ± 2.0</td><td></td><td>1,2 FALVARD</td><td>88 DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>4.8 ± 1.8</td><td></td><td>1 GIDAL</td><td>81 MRK2</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Re-evaluated using B(f<sub>2</sub>'(1525) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>) = 0.713.

²Including interference with f<sub>0</sub>(1710).

$$ \Gamma(\phi X(1835) \rightarrow \phi p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{125}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.1 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>16k BES3</td><td>J/ψ → p\bar{p}K<sup>0</sup>S K<sup>0</sup>L<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Upper limit applies to any p\bar{p} mass enhancement near threshold.
$$ \Gamma(\phi X(1835) \rightarrow \phi \eta \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{126}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.8 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>15H</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → φηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi X(1870) \rightarrow \phi \eta \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{127}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.13 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>15H</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → φηπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi K \bar{K}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{128}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>17.7 ± 1.6</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>16.6 ± 1.9 ± 1.2</td><td>163 ± 19</td><td>LEES</td><td>12F</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → 2(K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>)γ</td></tr><tr><td>21.4 ± 0.4 ± 2.2</td><td></td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>05</td><td>BES2 J/ψ → φπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>48 ± 20/16 ± 6</td><td>9.0 ± 3.7/3.0</td><td>1,2 HUANG</td><td>03</td><td>BELL B<sup>+</sup> → (φK<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>) K<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>14.6 ± 0.8 ± 2.1</td><td></td><td>3 FALVARD</td><td>88</td><td>DM2 J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>18 ± 8</td><td>14</td><td>FELDMAN</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹We have multiplied K⁺K⁻ measurement by 2 to obtain K̄.

²Using B(B⁺ → J/ψK⁺) = (1.01 ± 0.05) × 10⁻³.

³Addition of φK⁺K⁻ and φK⁰K⁰ branching ratios.

<figure><img src="image_652.png" /><figcaption>WEIGHTED AVERAGE
17.7±1.6 (Error scaled by 1.3)</figcaption></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\phi f_0(1710) \rightarrow \phi K \bar{K}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{129}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>3.6 ± 0.2 ± 0.6</b></td><td>1,2 FALVARD</td><td>88</td><td>DM2 J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Including interference with $\bar{\eta}'_2(1525)$.

²Includes unknown branching fraction $f_0(1710) \rightarrow K\bar{K}$.

$$ \Gamma(\phi K^{\pm} K_S^{\mp} \pi^{\mp}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{132}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>7.2 ± 0.8</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>7.4 ± 0.6 ± 1.4</td><td>227 ± 19</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>08E</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ</td></tr><tr><td>7.4 ± 0.9 ± 1.1</td><td></td><td>FALVARD</td><td>88</td><td>DM2 J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>7 ± 0.6 ± 1.0</td><td>163 ± 15</td><td>BECKER</td><td>87</td><td>MRK3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi K^*(892) K + \text{c.c.}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{133}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>21.8 ± 2.3</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>20.8 ± 2.7 ± 3.9</td><td>195 ± 25</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>08E</td><td>BES2 J/ψ → φK<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>29.6 ± 3.7 ± 4.7</td><td>238 ± 30</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>08E</td><td>BES2 J/ψ → φK<sub>S</sub><sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>20.7 ± 2.4 ± 3.0</td><td></td><td>FALVARD</td><td>88</td><td>DM2 J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>20 ± 3 ± 3</td><td>155 ± 20</td><td>BECKER</td><td>87</td><td>MRK3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(b_1(1235) \pm \pi^{\mp}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{134}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>30 ± 5</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>31 ± 6</td><td>4600</td><td>AUGUSTIN</td><td>89</td><td>DM2 J/ψ → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>29 ± 7</td><td>87</td><td>BURMESTER</td><td>77D</td><td>PLUT e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(b_1(1235)^0 \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{135}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>23 ± 3</b> ± 5</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Delta(1232) + \bar{\rho}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{137}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.1 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>HENRARD</td><td>87</td><td>DM2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Delta(1232)^+ \bar{\rho}^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{138}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>1.58 ± 0.23</b> ± 0.40</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Delta(1232)^+ \bar{\Delta}(1232)^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{139}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>1.10 ± 0.09</b> ± 0.28</td><td>233</td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma(1385)^0 \rho K^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{140}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.51 ± 0.26</b> ± 0.18</td><td>89</td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma(1385)^0 \bar{\Lambda} + \text{c.c.}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{141}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.82 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13F</td><td>BES3 J/ψ → pρπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γγ</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.2 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>HENRARD</td><td>87</td><td>DM2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma(1385)^- \bar{\Sigma}^+ + \text{c.c.}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{142}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.30 ± 0.07</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.30 ± 0.03 ± 0.08</td><td>74 ± 8</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>16L</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.29 ± 0.11 ± 0.10</td><td>26</td><td>HENRARD</td><td>87</td><td>DM2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma(1385)^+ \bar{\Sigma}^+ + \text{c.c.}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{143}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.33 ± 0.08</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.34 ± 0.04 ± 0.08</td><td>77</td><td>HENRARD</td><td>87</td><td>DM2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.31 ± 0.11 ± 0.11</td><td>28</td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma(1385)^- \bar{\Sigma}(1385)^+ + \text{c.c.}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{144}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>1.08 ± 0.06</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.096 ± 0.012 ± 0.071</td><td>43k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>16L</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.23 ± 0.07 ± 0.30</td><td>0.8k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>12P</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.00 ± 0.04 ± 0.21</td><td>0.6k</td><td>HENRARD</td><td>87</td><td>DM2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.86 ± 0.18 ± 0.22</td><td>56</td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma(1385)^+ \bar{\Sigma}(1385)^- + \text{c.c.}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{145}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>1.25 ± 0.07</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.258 ± 0.014 ± 0.078</td><td>53k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>16L</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.50 ± 0.08 ± 0.38</td><td>1k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>12P</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.19 ± 0.04 ± 0.25</td><td>0.7k</td><td>HENRARD</td><td>87</td><td>DM2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.03 ± 0.24 ± 0.25</td><td>68</td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma(1385)^0 \bar{\Sigma}(1385)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{146}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>1.071 ± 0.009</b> ± 0.082</td><td>103k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>17E</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda(1520) \bar{\Lambda} + \text{c.c.}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{147}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>12B</td><td>BES3 J/ψ → Λ̄Λγ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}(1520) \Lambda + \text{c.c.}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{148}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.80 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>LU</td><td>19</td><td>BELL B<sup>+</sup> → p̄K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Xi^0 \Xi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{149}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>1.17 ± 0.04</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.165 ± 0.004 ± 0.043</td><td>135k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>17E</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>1.20 ± 0.12 ± 0.21</td><td>206</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>08O</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Xi(1530)^- \bar{\Xi}^+ + \text{c.c.}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{150}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.318 ± 0.008</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.317 ± 0.002 ± 0.008</td><td>70k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>20</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ</td></tr><tr><td>0.59 ± 0.09 ± 0.12</td><td>75</td><td>HENRARD</td><td>87</td><td>DM2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Xi(1530)^0 \bar{\Xi}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{151}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.32 ± 0.12</b> ± 0.07</td><td>24 ± 9</td><td>HENRARD</td><td>87</td><td>DM2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Theta(1540) \bar{\Theta}(1540) → K_S^0 \rho K^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{152}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>04G</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Theta(1540) K^- \bar{\pi} → K_S^0 \rho K^- \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{153}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>04G</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Theta(1540) K_S^0 \bar{\rho} → K_S^0 \bar{\rho} K^+ n) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{154}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>04G</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>
$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Theta}(1540)K^{+}n \rightarrow K_{S}^{0}\bar{p}K^{+}n)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{155}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>04G</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Theta}(1540)K_{S}^{0}\rho \rightarrow K_{S}^{0}\rho K^{-}\bar{\pi})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{156}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>BAI</td><td>04G</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

STABLE HADRONS

$$ \Gamma(2(\pi^{+} \pi^{-})\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{157}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

4.2 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.1. See the ideogram below.

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.44 ±0.07 ±0.33</td><td>23K</td><td>ANASHIN</td><td>22</td><td>KEDR J/ψ → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3.5 ±0.8 ±0.1</td><td>14k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>21</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)3π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr><tr><td>4.73 ±0.44</td><td>228k</td><td>2 ABLIKIM</td><td>19Q</td><td>BES3 J/ψ → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3.25 ±0.49</td><td>46055</td><td>AUGUSTIN</td><td>89</td><td>DM2 J/ψ → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3.17 ±0.42</td><td>147</td><td>FRANKLIN</td><td>83</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>3.64 ±0.52</td><td>1500</td><td>BURMESTER</td><td>77D</td><td>PLUT e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>4 ±1</td><td>675</td><td>JEAN-MARIE</td><td>76</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 21 reports $[\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow 2(\pi^{+} \pi^{-})\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow e^{+} e^{-})] \times [B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)\pi^{0}\pi^{0})] = (14.8 \pm 2.6 \pm 2.2) \times 10^{-3}$ keV which we divide by our best values $\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow e^{+} e^{-}) = 2.33 \pm 0.04$ keV, $B(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)\pi^{0}\pi^{0}) = (18.2 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

2 From an energy scan of $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow J/\psi \rightarrow 2(\pi^{+} \pi^{-})\pi^{0}$, assuming PDG 16 values for $\Gamma(e^{+} e^{-})$, $\Gamma(\mu^{+} \mu^{-})$, and $\Gamma(\text{total})$, and for a phase difference between strong and electromagnetic amplitudes of (84.9 ± 3.6)°. An alternative solution is (4.85 ± 0.45)% with a phase of (-84.7 ± 3.1)°.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
4.2±0.4 (Error scaled by 2.1)

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

<figure><img src="image_653.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(2(\pi^{+} \pi^{-})\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-2}) $$

$$ \Gamma(3(\pi^{+} \pi^{-})\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{158}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.029 ±0.006 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.028 ±0.009</td><td>11</td><td>FRANKLIN</td><td>83</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>0.029 ±0.007</td><td>181</td><td>JEAN-MARIE</td><td>76</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{163}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>20.0 ±0.7 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.0. See the ideogram below.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>18.78 ±0.13 ±0.51</td><td>19.8k</td><td>1 ANASHIN</td><td>23</td><td>KEDR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>21.37 ±0.04 ±0.64</td><td>1.8M</td><td>2 ABLIKIM</td><td>12H</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>23.0 ±2.0 ±0.4</td><td>256</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>07AU BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ</td></tr><tr><td>21.84 ±0.05 ±2.01</td><td>220k</td><td>4,5 BAI</td><td>04H</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>20.91 ±0.21 ±1.16</td><td></td><td>5,6 BAI</td><td>04H</td><td>BES e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>15 ±2</td><td>168</td><td>FRANKLIN</td><td>83</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 By a simultaneous fit of the $\pi\pi$ invariant mass distribution over the decay modes $J/\psi \rightarrow \rho^{0}\pi^{0}$, $J/\psi \rightarrow \rho^{+}\pi^{-}$, $J/\psi \rightarrow \rho^{-}\pi^{+}$. In the fit only the intermediate states $\rho(770)$ and $\rho(1450)\pi$ are considered.

2 The quoted systematic error includes a contribution of 1.23% (added in quadrature) from the uncertainty on the number of $J/\psi$ events.

3 AUBERT 07AU reports $[\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [\Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)\pi^{+} \pi^{-}) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)\pi^{+} \pi^{-}) \times \Gamma(\psi(2S) \rightarrow e^{+} e^{-})] / \Gamma_{\text{total}} = 0.808 \pm 0.014$ keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

4 From $J/\psi \rightarrow \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{0}$ events directly.

5 Mostly $\rho\pi$, see also $\rho\pi$ subsection.

6 Obtained comparing the rates for $\pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{0}$ and $\mu^{+} \mu^{-}$, using $J/\psi$ events produced via $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \pi^{+} \pi^{-} J/\psi$ and with $B(J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^{+} \mu^{-}) = 5.88 \pm 0.10\%$.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
20.0±0.7 (Error scaled by 2.0)

<figure><img src="image_654.png" /></figure>

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{0} K^{+} K^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{165}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.52 ±0.27 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4.

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.74 ±0.08 ±0.24</td><td>2616</td><td>ANASHIN</td><td>22</td><td>KEDR J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.2 ±0.3</td><td>309</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{166}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.47 ±0.14 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.47 ±0.13 ±0.13</td><td>140</td><td>1 METREVELI</td><td>12</td><td>ψ(2S) → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td>1.58 ±0.20 ±0.15</td><td>84</td><td>BALTRUSAIT..85D</td><td>MRK3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.0 ±0.5</td><td>5</td><td>BRANDELIK</td><td>78B</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.6 ±1.6</td><td>1</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

$$ \Gamma(2(\pi^{+} \pi^{-}))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{167}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

3.20 ±0.25 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.88 ±0.14 ±0.24</td><td>2654</td><td>ANASHIN</td><td>22</td><td>KEDR J/ψ → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td>3.53 ±0.12 ±0.29</td><td>1107</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>05H</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → ψ(2S) → J/ψπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>, J/ψ → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table>

4.0 ±1.0

1 Computed using $B(J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^{+} \mu^{-}) = 0.0588 \pm 0.0010$.

$$ \Gamma(3(\pi^{+} \pi^{-}))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{168}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>40 ±20</td><td>32</td><td>JEAN-MARIE</td><td>76</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(4(\pi^{+} \pi^{-})\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{170}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>90 ±30</td><td>13</td><td>JEAN-MARIE</td><td>76</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(2(\pi^{+} \pi^{-})\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{171}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.29 ±0.28 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.1 ±1.5 ±0.1</td><td>14k</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>21</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)3π<sup>0</sup>γ</td></tr><tr><td>2.26 ±0.08 ±0.27</td><td>4.8k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>05C</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → 2(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)η</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 LEES 21 reports $[\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow 2(\pi^{+} \pi^{-})\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow e^{+} e^{-})] \times [B(\eta \rightarrow 3\pi^{0})] = (5.6 \pm 2.6 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-3}$ keV which we divide by our best values $\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow e^{+} e^{-}) = 5.53 \pm 0.10$ keV, $B(\eta \rightarrow 3\pi^{0}) = (32.57 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(3(\pi^{+} \pi^{-})\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{172}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.24 ±0.96 ±1.11</td><td>616</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>05C</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → 3(π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)η</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ \Gamma(K^{+} K^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{176}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.86 ±0.09 ±0.19</td><td>1k</td><td>1 METREVELI</td><td>12</td><td>ψ(2S) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.39 ±0.24 ±0.22</td><td>107</td><td>2 BALTRUSAIT..85D</td><td>MRK3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.2 ±0.9</td><td>6</td><td>2 BRANDELIK</td><td>79C</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

2 Interference with non-resonant $K^{+} K^{-}$ production not taken into account.
$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K_L^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{177}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.95±0.11 OUR AVERAGE

Error includes scale factor of 2.4. See the ideogram below.

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.93±0.01±0.05</td><td>110k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>17AH BES3</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> K<sup>0</sup><sub>L</sub> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>2.62±0.15±0.14</td><td>0.3k</td><td>1 METREVELI</td><td>12</td><td>ψ(2S) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> K<sup>0</sup><sub>L</sub></td></tr><tr><td>1.82±0.04±0.13</td><td>2.1k</td><td>2 BAI</td><td>04A BES2</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> K<sup>0</sup><sub>L</sub> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> X</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.18±0.12±0.18</td><td>JOUSSET</td><td>90</td><td>DM2</td><td>J/ψ → hadrons</td></tr><tr><td>1.01±0.16±0.09</td><td>74</td><td>BALTRUSAITI..85D</td><td>MRK3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.

²Using B(K_S^0 → π^+π^-) = 0.6868 ± 0.0027.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.95±0.11 (Error scaled by 2.4)

<figure><img src="image_655.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{178}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.4 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>17AH BES3</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 BAI</td><td>04D</td><td>BES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BALTRUSAITI..85C</td><td>MRK3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Forbidden by CP.

$$ \Gamma(K\bar{K}\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{179}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>61 ±10 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td>FRANKLIN</td><td>83</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>78.0 ±21.0</td><td>126</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> K<sup>±</sup> π<sup>∓</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{180}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.88 ±0.01 ±0.12</td><td>183k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19AQ BES</td><td>J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{0})/\Gamma(\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}) \qquad \Gamma_{180}/\Gamma_{163} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>12.0 ±0.3 ±0.9</td><td>23k</td><td>LEES</td><td>17C</td><td>BABR J/ψ → h<sup>+</sup> h<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K^\pm\mp)/\Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0) \qquad \Gamma_{181}/\Gamma_{163} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>26.5 ±0.5 ±2.1</td><td>24k</td><td>LEES</td><td>17C</td><td>BABR J/ψ → h<sup>0</sup> h<sup>+</sup> h<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{185}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.04 ±0.26 ±0.92</td><td>2671</td><td>ANASHIN</td><td>22</td><td>KEDR J/ψ → K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>7.2 ±2.3</td><td>205</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-}2(\pi^{+}\pi^{-}))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{197}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>31 ±13</td><td>30</td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(2(K^{+}K^{-}))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{199}/\Gamma $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.4 +0.5 / -0.4</td><td>0.2</td><td>11.0 +4.3 / -3.5</td><td>1 HUANG</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>B<sup>+</sup> → 2(K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>) K<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.7 ±0.3</td><td></td><td></td><td>VANNUCCI</td><td>77</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Using B(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>+</sup>) = (1.01 ± 0.05) × 10<sup>-3</sup>.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{207}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.120±0.029 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.112±0.004±0.031</td><td>314k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>12c</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.17 ±0.16 ±0.04</td><td>317</td><td>1 WU</td><td>06</td><td>BELL B<sup>+</sup> → p p̄ K<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.26 ±0.01 ±0.14</td><td>63316</td><td>BAI</td><td>04E</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → J/ψ</td></tr><tr><td>1.97 ±0.22</td><td>99</td><td>BALDINI</td><td>98</td><td>FENI e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.91 ±0.04 ±0.30</td><td></td><td>PALLIN</td><td>87</td><td>DM2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.16 ±0.07 ±0.15</td><td>1420</td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.5 ±0.4</td><td>133</td><td>BRANDELIK</td><td>79c</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.0 ±0.5</td><td></td><td>BESCH</td><td>78</td><td>BONA e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.2 ±0.2</td><td>331</td><td>2 PERUZZI</td><td>78</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.0 ±0.3</td><td>48</td><td>ANTONELLI</td><td>93</td><td>SPEC e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹WU 06 reports [Γ(J/ψ(1S) → p p̄ )/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψ(1S) K<sup>+</sup>)] = (2.21 ± 0.13 ± 0.10) × 10<sup>-6</sup> which we divide by our best value B(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψ(1S) K<sup>+</sup>) = (1.020 ± 0.019) × 10<sup>-3</sup>. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Assuming angular distribution (1+cos²θ).

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{208}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.19±0.08 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.33±0.02±0.11</td><td>11k</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>09b</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.13±0.09±0.09</td><td>685</td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.4 ±0.4</td><td></td><td>BRANDELIK</td><td>79c</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.00±0.15</td><td>109</td><td>PERUZZI</td><td>78</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{209}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

6.0 ±0.5 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>6.46±0.17±0.43</td><td>1435</td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3.8 ±1.6</td><td>48</td><td>BESCH</td><td>81</td><td>BONA e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>5.5 ±0.6</td><td>533</td><td>PERUZZI</td><td>78</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
6.0±0.5 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_656.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{210}/\Gamma $$

Including p p̄ π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> γ and excluding ω, η, η'

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.3 ±0.9 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.36±0.65±0.28</td><td>364</td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>1.6 ±0.6</td><td>39</td><td>PERUZZI</td><td>78</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{211}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.00±0.12 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.91±0.02±0.17</td><td>13k</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>09</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.03±0.13±0.15</td><td>826</td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.5 ±1.2</td><td></td><td>BRANDELIK</td><td>79c</td><td>DASP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.3 ±0.4</td><td>197</td><td>PERUZZI</td><td>78</td><td>MRK1 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From the combination of p p̄ η → p p̄ γγ and p p̄ η → p p̄ π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> 0 channels.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}\rho)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{212}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.31 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>EATON</td><td>84</td><td>MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → hadronsγ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}\omega)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{213}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.98±0.10 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.90±0.02±0.09</td><td>2670</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>13p</td><td>BES3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.98±0.03±0.14</td><td>2449</td><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>08</td><td>BES2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>