# Oviduct epithelium interactions: roles in sperm selection and embryo quality

Marie Saint-Dizier, Joanna Maria Gonçalves Souza-Fabjan, Karine Reynaud, Pascal Mermillod, Carmen Almiñana, Stefan Bauersachs, Coline Mahé

► To cite this version:

Marie Saint-Dizier, Joanna Maria Gonçalves Souza-Fabjan, Karine Reynaud, Pascal Mermillod, Carmen Almiñana, et al.. Oviduct epithelium interactions: roles in sperm selection and embryo quality. Animal Reproduction, 2025, 38th Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Embryo Technology Society (SBTE), 22 (3), pp.e20250035. 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2025-0035. [https://hal.science/hal-05314863v1](https://hal.science/hal-05314863v1)

HAL Id: hal-05314863

https://hal.science/hal-05314863v1

Submitted on 14 Oct 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Thematic Section: 41st Annual Scientific Meeting of the Association of Embryo Technology in Europe (AETE)

# Oviduct epithelium interactions: roles in sperm selection and embryo quality

Marie Saint-Dizier<fnref n="1" />* , Joanna Maria Gonçalves Souza-Fabjan<fnref n="2" /> , Karine Reynaud<fnref n="1" /> , Pascal Mermillod<fnref n="1" /> , Carmen Almiñana<fnref n="3" /> , Stefan Bauersachs<fnref n="4" /> , Coline Mahé<fnref n="1" />

**How to cite:** Saint-Dizier M, Souza-Fabjan JMG, Reynaud K, Mermillod P, Almiñana C, Bauersachs S, Mahé C. Oviduct epithelium interactions: roles in sperm selection and embryo quality. Anim Reprod. 2025;22(3):e20250035. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2025-0035

## Abstract

This review provides an up-to-date overview of the roles of the oviduct during the periconception period and underlying mechanisms. The functions of the oviduct before, during, and after fertilization are highlighted, with special focus on the effects of epithelial cell contact and luminal secretions on sperm selection mechanisms and acquisition of fertilization ability. The current knowledge on how the oviduct contributes to support fertilization and embryo development via the overall physical milieu (oxygen tension, fluid current, ciliated epithelial cells) and the role of its secretions is also provided. Altogether, the review underlines the unique role of the oviduct during gamete selection and early embryo development, which so far has not been completely possible to mirror when assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are used. Unveiling the most important functional components of oviductal secretions that contribute to better sperm selection, and boost sperm fertilizing ability and early embryo development, can indeed be useful to improve the outcomes of current *in vitro* systems used in ART.

**Keywords:** oviduct, fallopian tube, embryo, gamete, spermatozoa.

## Introduction

The oviduct is one of the least accessible organs of the female body, located deep in the abdomen and except in primates, partly enclosed in an ovarian bursa, with a very small diameter (< 3-5 mm) and a lumen with a labyrinth of mucosa folds (Yaniz et al., 2000) (Figure 1). This complex anatomy, combined with the low number of gametes and embryos transiting within its lumen, poses considerable challenges to observe gamete/embryo-oviduct interactions with current live *in vivo* imaging techniques. *In situ* pictures of spermatozoa and embryos were recently obtained in living mice, but particularly from the ampulla and with limited resolution (Wang and Larina, 2018, 2021). Thus, most data reported so far on oviduct interactions with gametes and embryos, and gathered in this review, have been obtained using *in vitro* models of the oviduct epithelium, including monolayers of oviduct epithelial cells (OECs), oviduct explants or aggregates, and oviduct spheroids.

<footnote n="1">¹Institut National de Recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - INRAE, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CNRS, Université de Tours, Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Nouzilly, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, Niterói, RJ, Brasil</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴Institute of Veterinary Anatomy, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Lindau, Switzerland</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Cross-section of a bovine ampulla at the pre-ovulatory stage of cycle. Green = pan cytokeratin (epithelial cell marker); blue = nuclei (Hoechst staining). (A) smooth muscle; (B) epithelium; (C) lumen; (D) stroma.</figcaption></figure>

Within the oviduct, key reproductive processes take place: sperm and egg transport, final sperm maturation, oocyte nuclear maturation (in dogs) and zona pellucida hardening, fertilization, and the first embryonic divisions. Gamete maturation, fertilization, and embryonic development until the blastocyst stage can also be achieved *in vitro* when assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are used, resulting in the birth of healthy offspring. However, bypassing the oviduct might come with a price, leading to fewer selection steps for spermatozoa and poor-quality embryos. In cattle, for example, over the past 25 years, the pregnancy rates of recipient cows carrying *in vitro*-produced (IVP) embryos have been 10 to 40% lower than with *in vivo*-derived embryos, and only 27% of cows receiving IVP embryos delivered a living calf (Ealy et al., 2019). The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date overview of the role of the oviduct milieu on sperm selection and embryo quality, but also to highlight the benefits of using different *in vitro* oviduct models to understand the underlying mechanisms and mimic the gamete/embryo-oviductal interactions before, during, and after fertilization.

## Before fertilization

Before entering the female genital tract, a significant remodeling of the sperm surface operates in the epididymis and during ejaculation by mixing with the seminal plasma. Spermatozoa at ejaculation are not able to fertilize and acquire this capacity, named capacitation, in the female genital tract: in that end, previous interactions in the male tract have a crucial role in the sperm selection described below and fertility (Rodriguez-Martinez et al., 2024). Although beyond the scope of this review, the seminal plasma also interacts with the female tract and triggers cellular and molecular changes in its luminal epithelium, which contribute to sperm selection and the fertilization success (for reviews, see (Robertson, 2007; Bromfield, 2014).
The utero-tubal junction selects a subpopulation of sperm entering the oviduct

When artificial insemination (AI) is performed in the cervix, like in sows and sheep, a drastic sperm selection take place in the tract as approximately one out of 10 million sperm reaches the oviduct (First et al., 1968; Hawk et al., 1978). In cows inseminated with millions to billions of sperm into the uterine body, only few hundreds of spermatozoa were counted in the oviducts within 5 to 8 h after AI (Hawk, 1987). The selection rate of motile sperm before IVF in cattle is on average much less restrictive, with approximately 10 to 40% sperm recovery rate after processing with the usual density gradient centrifugation or swim-up (Cesari et al., 2006; Vega-Hidalgo et al., 2022). The very tight utero-tubal junction (UTJ) has dead-end mucosa folds (Yániz et al., 2000) and mucin-rich secretions (Rickard et al., 2019), which constitute a physical barrier for sperm, allowing only the highly motile and morphologically normal ones with an intact acrosome to reach the oviduct (Sostaric et al., 2008; Hourcade et al., 2010; Muro et al., 2016). The UTJ may select sperm according to additional criteria, since a much higher proportion of sperm with no DNA damage was found in the oviduct compared to the uterine cavity of mice after mating (Hourcade et al., 2010). Furthermore, 22 genes, including those coding for ADAM metallopeptidase domain 3 (ADAM3), a sperm surface protein, were identified as essential for sperm passage through the UTJ in mice (Fujihara et al., 2018, 2019; Xiong et al., 2019; Larasati et al., 2020) (Figure 2). Male mice deficient for each of these genes were sterile despite normal sperm morphology and motility, highlighting the crucial role of molecular interactions in sperm migration toward the oviduct. However, in non-rodent mammals, the existence of such a sperm molecular passport is still not known.

Sperm transport in the oviduct is believed to be achieved through the combined effects of muscular contractions, OEC cilia beating, and the luminal fluid microflows (Ezzati et al., 2014), however, the relative contribution of these three mechanisms remains unclear. Recent data in a knockout mouse model lacking motile cilia evidenced that ciliary beating facilitates but is not mandatory for sperm transport toward the ampulla (Yuan et al., 2021). Yet, given the anatomical particularities of the oviduct in mice, the presence of motile cilia may be crucial for sperm transport and final maturation in other mammals (see below).

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Morphological and molecular factors for sperm passage through the utero-tubal junction. In mice, only highly motile sperm with an intact acrosome can pass the utero-tubal junction (Hourcade et al., 2010; Muro et al., 2016). Sperm from mice deficient for 22 genes, including 19 involved in Adam3 expression (in black) and 3 Adam3-independent ones (in red), were not able to cross the utero-tubal junction (Fujihara et al., 2018, 2019; Larasati et al., 2020; Xiong et al., 2019), suggesting their involvement in sperm migration toward the oviduct.</figcaption></figure>
A sperm reservoir forms thanks to specific molecular interactions within the isthmus

Maintaining sperm viable in the oviduct during the pre-ovulatory period is crucial due to the considerable variation in the timing between the onset of estrus and ovulation in most mammalian females (Kemp and Soede, 1997; Saumande and Humblot, 2005). From a practical point of view, increasing sperm viability would allow for a decrease in the number of inseminations needed per pregnancy and the time-consuming detection of estrus (Kemp and Soede, 1997; Soede and Kemp, 1997). One key interaction with the oviduct epithelium for sperm lifespan takes place in the distal segment of the isthmus, where sperm may survive for hours to days, or even months in some bat species (Holt and Fazeli, 2016). For example, in heifers mated at the beginning of estrus, sperm can be held as long as 18-24 h in the caudal isthmus (Wilmut and Hunter, 1984; Hawk, 1987). In gilts mated early in estrus, sperm may survive for 36 h or more in the caudal isthmus (Hunter, 1984). Beyond sperm viability, the sperm reservoir is believed to synchronize gamete meeting and decrease the risk of polyspermy by allowing the progressive release of sperm toward the ampulla, where fertilization occurs (Hunter, 2012; Miller, 2018). The mechanisms of sperm binding to OECs are not completely understood but it is well established that only motile acrosome-intact sperm bind by their head to the extremity of tubal cilia, which firmly grip to the sperm pre-acrosomal region (Suarez et al., 1991; Sostaric et al., 2008; Camara Pirez et al., 2020; Mahe et al., 2023b; Schmaltz et al., 2024b) (Figure 3). Live imaging of sperm co-incubated with oviduct mucosa revealed that immotile sperm were unable to attach and rapidly eliminated by the fluid flow generated by ciliary beating while attached sperm had an active tail beating at the time of binding (Camara Pirez et al., 2020).

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Bull sperm bound to motile cilia of the oviduct epithelium. (A) Scanning electron microscopy picture obtained after co-incubation of frozen-thawed density gradient-washed bull sperm with isthmic epithelial spheroids in a non-capacitating medium; (B) Higher magnification showing a sperm bound with its head to the distal extremity of motile cilia. Microvilli at the surface of secretory non-ciliated cells are seen around the sperm head. Note that all spermatozoa are acrosome-intact with a normal morphology.</figcaption></figure>

Specific glycan motifs that are part of the luminal glycocalyx of OECs (Kadirvel et al., 2012; Machado et al., 2014; Dutta et al., 2019a), and non-glycosylated membrane proteins such as annexins (Ignotz et al., 2007; Teijeiro et al., 2009; Schmaltz et al., 2024a), have been proposed as sperm receptors on oviduct epithelial cells in mammals (for details, see Figure 4). Although most sperm ligands for these oviductal receptors remain to be determined, our group recently showed that phosphatidylserine (PS) exposed on the heads of motile sperm undergoing capacitation interact with annexin A5 on oviduct epithelial cilia (Schmaltz et al., 2024a). Furthermore, the seminal plasma proteins that coat the sperm membrane at ejaculation, including the spermadhesins BSP 1, 3, and 5 in cattle (Gwathmey et al., 2006) and AQN1 in pigs
(Ekhlasi-Hundrieser et al., 2005), were found to mediate sperm binding to OECs, possibly through fucose interaction in cattle (Lefebvre et al., 1997).

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

**Figure 4.** Proteins and phospholipids identified for sperm binding to oviduct epithelial cells Two ligand-receptor couples have been identified so far: the integrin α5β1-fibronectin couple in cattle (brown, on the left; Osycka-Salut et al., 2017) and the phosphatidylserine (PS)-annexin A5 couple in pigs (purple, on the right; Schmaltz et al., 2024a). Proteins from the seminal plasma, including binder of sperm proteins (BSP) 1,3 and 5 in cattle (green, on the left; Gwathmey et al., 2006) and aquaporin (AQN1; Ekhlasi-Hundrieser et al., 2005) in pigs (blue, on the right) have been proposed as additional sperm ligands to cilia. On the female side, several annexins (ANX) were identified as sperm receptors in cattle and pigs (in purple, on cilia) (Ignotz et al., 2007; Teijeiro et al., 2009; Schmaltz et al., 2024a). In addition, boar sperm bind specifically to specific glycans, including Lewis X trisaccharide (LeX), 3'-O-sulfated form of LeX, and 6-sialylated N-acetyllactosamine (bi-SiaLN), while bull sperm bound 3'-O-sulfated form of Lewis A trisaccharide (Kadirvel et al., 2012; Machado et al., 2014; Dutta et al., 2019a).

**Are spermatozoa selected through binding to oviduct epithelial cells?**

By using million-per-mL sperm concentrations co-cultured with OEC monolayers for 30 to 60 min, the reported proportions of bound sperm varied from 20-30% for bulls (Gualtieri and Talevi, 2003) to 50-60% for boars (Lopez-Ubeda et al., 2017), including only motile and morphologically normal sperm with an intact acrosome (Gualtieri and Talevi, 2003; Lamy et al., 2017; Lopez-Ubeda et al., 2017; Camara Pirez et al., 2020). These studies compared bound sperm and those that remained unbound in the co-culture medium in order to evaluate whether sperm binding is a selective process. Although for this purpose, supraphysiological
sperm concentration, e.g. above mentioned has been used, which probably induces a saturation of sperm binding sites on OECs. Compared to the unbound population, bound sperm displayed higher membrane and DNA integrity in humans (Ellington et al., 1999), horses (Leemans et al., 2014), and cattle (Kon et al., 2009; Nag et al., 2021), in accord with the above hypothesis. Furthermore, the density of bound sperm per oviduct explant surface has been positively associated with conception rates after AI for bulls (De Pauw et al., 2002; Saraf et al., 2019; Nag et al., 2021; Donnellan et al., 2022) and boars (Waberski et al., 2006; Daigneault et al., 2015; Winters et al., 2018). Although a high variability among ejaculates of individual bulls and boars was reported (Camara Pirez et al., 2020; Donnellan et al., 2022; Schmaltz et al., 2024b), using sperm ability to bind to OECs has been proposed to predict male fertility in complement to traditional quality assessment methods (Daigneault et al., 2015; Winters et al., 2018).

In the above studies, a proportion of unbound spermatozoa would probably be able to bind with more explant or spheroid surface available and could not be considered as "low-quality" spermatozoa. *In vivo*, it is still not known if sperm-cilia interaction is a prerequisite for fertilization. However, given the length of the oviduct (5-30 cm among mammals), the proportion of multi-ciliated cells lining its tight lumen (around 25% at estrus (Ito et al., 2016)), and the low number of sperm entering its lumen (a few thousands), it is likely that the large majority, if not all, sperm interact with oviduct cilia during their migration towards oocytes. In accord, bull sperm interact with isthmic and ampullar epithelial cells with similar densities and behaviors *in vitro* (Sostaric et al., 2008; Ardon et al., 2016; El-Sokary et al., 2022). Therefore, there is probably no sperm selection *per se* through binding to oviduct cilia *in vivo*, but rather a variable response of sperm cells to binding, leading to variable ability to survive and undergo capacitation on time.

## Binding to OECs regulates sperm capacitation and oxidative stress

Spermatozoa in the female genital tract mostly rely on their environment to delay or induce capacitation. Delaying sperm capacitation before ovulation may be critical to maintain a subpopulation of viable sperm within the female tract. Capacitation comprises multiple steps, including cholesterol efflux and PS externalization at the membrane, calcium influx, increased tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins, and an asymmetrical flagellar beating, called hyperactivated motility (Puga Molina et al., 2018). Sperm are particularly susceptible to oxidative stress due to very little cytoplasmic content and inadequate cell repair systems (Dutta et al., 2019b). Human sperm bound to oviductal membrane proteins displayed lower intracellular ROS levels (Huang et al., 2013), suggesting that binding to OECs may protect sperm against oxidative stress. Similarly, binding of boar sperm to their oviductal glycan ligand (suLeX) decreased their production of intracellular ubiquinone, fumarate (one component of the citric acid cycle) and ROS (Hughes et al., 2023), suggesting that binding to specific oviduct glycans triggers a reduction in mitochondrial activity that delays capacitation and lengthens sperm lifespan. However, the reported effects of sperm binding to OECs on capacitation are not consistent. Boar sperm binding to OECs or oviduct glycans was reported to inhibit calcium influx (Machado et al., 2020), PS externalization (Lopez-Ubeda et al., 2017), and protein tyrosine phosphorylation (Luno et al., 2013; Lopez-Ubeda et al., 2017). On the contrary, some studies reported a stimulation of the cyclic AMP/protein kinase A pathway leading to acrosome reaction in human (Martinez-Leon et al., 2015) and bull sperm (Osycka-Salut et al., 2020) after binding to fibronectin, a glycoprotein present on the luminal surface of oviduct ciliated cells (Makrigiannakis et al., 2009; Osycka-Salut et al., 2017). The binding to oviduct explants was also shown to induce protein tyrosine phosphorylation in stallion (Leemans et al., 2014) and boar (Petrunkina et al., 2004) spermatozoa. A similar positive effect on capacitation was observed after sperm exposure to peri-ovulatory oviduct fluid (OF) in a number of species, including cattle (Bergqvist et al., 2006; Kumaresan et al., 2019), pigs (Kumaresan et al., 2012), and sheep (El-Shahat et al., 2018). Of note, when using oviduct explants, a combined effect of sperm-to-cilia contact and OECs secretions in the vicinity of bound sperm is observed, which may contribute to the variability in sperm response according to female cell physiology. Further
studies are needed to assess whether the introduction of standardized batches of oviductal
compounds (sperm ciliary ligand, frozen or lyophilized oviduct fluid) into standard IVF protocols
could improve their outcomes.

Oviduct secretions deliver key molecules for sperm maturation

The oviduct epithelium releases soluble ions and molecules which can interact directly with gametes/embryos, and molecules enclosed in luminal extracellular vesicles (EVs), also called oviductosomes (Saint-Dizier et al., 2019). Oviduct EVs include small (40-100 nm) and larger vesicles (100-1000 nm) and have been shown to interact with the sperm membrane in a number of species, including pigs (Alcântara-Neto et al., 2020a; Toledo-Guardiola et al., 2024), cattle (Franchi et al., 2020), horses (Lange-Consiglio et al., 2022), cats (Ferraz et al., 2019), and mice (Al-Dossary et al., 2013; Al-Dossary et al., 2015; Bathala et al., 2018). Evaluation of the functional impact of these interactions showed that oviduct EVs modulate sperm motility (Ferraz et al., 2019; Alcântara-Neto et al., 2020a), survival (Alcântara-Neto et al., 2019), processes of capacitation such as protein kinase A phosphorylation (Toledo-Guardiola et al., 2024), protein tyrosine phosphorylation and calcium influx (Franchi et al., 2020), acrosome reaction (Ferraz et al., 2019; Franchi et al., 2020; Lange-Consiglio et al., 2022), and the ability to fertilize oocytes *in vitro* (Ferraz et al., 2019; Lange-Consiglio et al., 2022; Toledo-Guardiola et al., 2024).

Some crucial molecules for conception may be delivered to sperm by secretions of the female reproductive tract. One example is sperm adhesion molecule 1 (SPAM1, also named PH-20), a highly conserved hyaluronidase GPI-linked to the sperm membrane that plays roles in penetration through cumulus cells, adhesion to the zona pellucida, and acrosome reaction (Martin-DeLeon, 2006). Although the initial acquisition of SPAM1 takes place in the epididymis through fusion with epididymosomes, sperm are also exposed to SPAM1 in the uterine and oviduct fluids at estrus, as shown in mice (Zhang and Martin-DeLeon, 2003; Griffiths et al., 2008b). Sperm exposed to estrous uterine fluid take up SPAM1 over the acrosome and midpiece of the flagella, leading to an enhanced ability to bind hyaluronic acid (Griffiths et al., 2008a, b).

Another example is the membrane protein calcium ATPase 4 (PMCA4), a major calcium pump, whose deletion leads to a loss of sperm motility and male infertility in mice (Al-Dossary et al., 2013). PMCA4 is highly expressed in the oviduct, and its concentration in the OF is up to 9-fold higher than in other parts of the female reproductive tract in mice at estrus (Al-Dossary et al., 2013). Transmission immunoelectron and high-resolution structured illumination microscopy have evidenced the delivery of PMCA4 to the sperm head and the flagellum midpiece membrane via fusion of oviduct EVs involving integrins and CD9 (Al-Dossary et al., 2013, 2015). The delivery of calcium pumps to sperm via female secretions remains to be explored in other mammals, but the presence of PMCA1 and PMCA4 in human OF EVs (Bathala et al., 2018) suggests that it might be a conserved process.

During fertilization

Spermatozoa pre-bound to oviduct epithelial cells display higher fertilizing ability

The timed release of spermatozoa from the caudal isthmus towards the ampulla, where cumulus-oocyte complexes progress after ovulation, is a prerequisite for fertilization. The exact mechanisms leading to sperm release are not fully understood but they likely involve endocrine and probably paracrine signals in the oviduct epithelium. Following the luteinization of pre-ovulatory follicles, levels of progesterone dramatically rise in the OF, reaching around 30 nM just after ovulation in sows and cows (Ballester et al., 2014; Lamy et al., 2016b). Nanomolar concentrations of progesterone have been shown to induce a CatSper-mediated hyperactivated motility and release of bound sperm from OECs in cattle and pigs (Lamy et al., 2017; Machado et al., 2019; Romero-Aguirregomezcorta et al., 2019). Other compounds fluctuating in concentrations in the OF around ovulation time, including fibronectin (Osycka-Salut et al., 2017, 2020) and heparin-like sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAG) (Talevi and
Gualtieri, 2001; Bergqvist and Rodriguez-Martinez, 2006; Mahe et al., 2023b), may act synergistically with progesterone on sperm release. Sperm release may be also facilitated by natriuretic peptide type C (NPCC) expressed in ampullar epithelial cells (Wang et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2023). In response to the contact with mature cumulus-oocyte complexes, NPCC expression was enhanced in porcine and mouse ampulla, while its receptor (NPR2) was found on the midpiece of sperm (Wang et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2023) (Figure 5). Nanomolar concentrations of NPCC promoted pig sperm release from isthmic explants mechanism implying calcium and cGMP-sensitive cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (Wu et al., 2023).

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Molecular signals inducing sperm release from oviduct epithelial cells. Progesterone in cattle (Lamy et al., 2017; Romero-Aguirregomezcorta et al., 2019) and pigs (Machado et al., 2019); natriuretic peptide type C (NPCC) in mice (Wang et al., 2022) and pigs (Wu et al., 2023); sulfated glycosaminoglycans in cattle (Mahe et al., 2023b; Talevi and Gualtieri, 2001); fibronectin in cattle (Osycka-Salut et al., 2017, 2020).</figcaption></figure>

Examination of the sperm subpopulation released from OECs by the action of fibronectin showed higher progressive motility with signs of capacitation (Osycka-Salut et al., 2017). A practical limitation of using sperm pre-bound to OEC for *in vitro* fertilization (IVF) is the limited numbers of sperm that can be recovered (less than 50% of the bound population, i.e. < 25% of the initial population) and their quantification before IVF, which requires extra manipulation. Another limitation is the use of frozen-thawed semen as the freezing process induces a destabilization of the sperm membrane and capacitation-like changes, which were reported to decrease the ability of sperm to bind to OECs *in vitro* in cattle (Goldman et al., 1998) and pigs (Tomas et al., 2013). Nevertheless, studies that used sperm pre-bound to OEC then released for IVF evidenced an increase in the rates of oocyte penetration and cleavage compared to unbound or not selected control sperm, using frozen-thawed semen in cattle (Gualtieri and Talevi, 2003; Kon et al., 2009; Lamy et al., 2017; El-Sokary et al., 2022) and fresh semen in pigs (Bureau et al., 2000; Lopez-Ubeda et al., 2017) (see Table 1 for details). Higher cleavage rates were observed when bull sperm were pre-bound to explants from the isthmus compared to ampulla or infundibulum (El-Sokary et al., 2022), suggesting a region-specific effect of binding-release on sperm fertilizing ability. Furthermore, the use of boar sperm pre-bound to porcine OECs (Bureau et al., 2000) or to suLeX glycan motifs (Soto-Heras et al., 2025) increased the numbers of monospermic zygotes after IVF. Our group also examined the blastocyst rate, which was enhanced after IVFwhen sperm was pre-bound to OECs and released by progesterone compared to controls in cattle (Lamy et al., 2017). Overall, the enhanced fertilizing ability was obtained after only 30 to 60 min of sperm binding to OECs (Gualtieri and Talevi, 2003; Lamy et al., 2017; Soto-Heras et al., 2025).
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Studies reporting an improvement in the *in vitro* fertilization ability of sperm after binding to oviductal epithelial cells or glycans and release.</caption><thead><tr><th>Species</th><th>In vitro oviduct model</th><th>Sperm preparation</th><th>Main result</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Cattle</td><td>OEC monolayer from the whole oviduct of pubertal cows</td><td>Frozen-thawed and Percoll-gradient washed bull semen</td><td>Sperm bound to OEC and then released by heparin displayed higher ZP binding capacity and produced higher cleavage rates after IVF, compared with unbound and control sperm.</td><td>Gualtieri and Talevi (2003)</td></tr><tr><td>Cattle</td><td>OEC suspension from the whole oviduct of pubertal cows at post-ovulatory stage</td><td>Frozen-thawed and Percoll-gradient washed bull semen</td><td>Unbound free sperm displayed lower ZP binding capacity and produced less fertilized COCs or denuded oocytes, compared with a mix of bound and unbound sperm (control).</td><td>Kon et al. (2009)</td></tr><tr><td>Cattle</td><td>OEC monolayer from the whole oviduct of pubertal cows at peri-ovulatory stage</td><td>Frozen-thawed and Percoll-gradient washed bull semen</td><td>Sperm bound to OEC and then released by P4 produced higher cleavage and blastocyst rates after IVF, compared with controls without OEC</td><td>Lamy et al. (2017)</td></tr><tr><td>Cattle</td><td>Cell aggregates from isthmus of pubertal cows</td><td>Frozen-thawed bull semen pre-selected by swim up</td><td>Sperm bound to aggregates from isthmus produced higher cleavage rates on day 2 after IVF, compared with control sperm.</td><td>El-Sokary et al. (2022)</td></tr><tr><td>Pig</td><td>OEC monolayer</td><td>Fresh Percoll-gradient washed boar semen</td><td>Sperm pre-incubated with OEC produced higher rates of zygotes with two pronuclei and reduced polyspermy compared with controls without cells.</td><td>Bureau et al. (2000)</td></tr><tr><td>Pig</td><td>OEC monolayer from the whole oviduct of cycling gilts</td><td>Fresh Percoll-gradient washed boar semen</td><td>Sperm bound to OEC and then co-incubated with oocytes produced higher penetration rates and nuclear decondensation after IVF, compared with unbound sperm.</td><td>Lopez-Ubeda et al. (2017)</td></tr><tr><td>Pig</td><td>Oviduct glycans coupled to a glass surface</td><td>Fresh Percoll-gradient washed boar semen</td><td>Sperm bound to sulfated Lewis X trisaccharide and then released by COCs produced higher rates of monospermic zygotes, compared with control sperm with no pre-binding.</td><td>Soto-Heras et al. (2025)</td></tr></tbody></table>

OEC: oviduct epithelial cells; ZP: zona pellucida; IVF: in vitro fertilization; COCs: cumulus-oocytes complexes.

Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that sperm binding-release processes along the oviduct improve or accelerate the capacity of sperm to fertilize oocytes, maybe through the delivery of key molecules during binding. It may also be the case that the binding process selects a sperm population of higher quality, although the exact characteristics or molecular passport of the selected sperm remains unknown.

## Oviduct secretions favor monospermic fertilization

Oocyte polyspermy during IVF is a common problem, particularly frequent in pigs and goats, and leading to early embryo demise. Supplementation with OF, OEC secretions, or oviductal proteins during IVF reduced the rate of polyspermic zygotes while maintaining good rates of oocyte penetration, as reported in goats (Bragança et al., 2021), horses (Mugnier et al., 2009; Ambruosi et al., 2013), and pigs (Romar et al., 2001; Batista et al., 2016; Alcântara-Neto et al., 2020b). A similar beneficial effect on polyspermy was obtained when using oviduct EVs derived from the OF (Alcântara-Neto et al., 2020b) or OECs monolayers (Fang et al., 2023), resulting in higher blastocyst rates in pigs (Fang et al., 2023).
The aforementioned effects could be mediated through modifications of both gametes, although oocytes are probably the major players. Exposure of oocytes to OF before IVF reproduced the beneficial effects obtained with OF in pigs (Batista et al., 2016). The OF has been shown to induce the hardening of the oocyte zona pellucida within 30 min or less and this ability was correlated with its ability to induce monospermy during IVF in pigs (Mondejar et al., 2013). The actors of the hardening of the zona pellucida have been partly identified, including: oviductal glycoprotein 1 (OVGP1), lactotransferrin (LTF), members of the HSP and PDI protein families, and heparin-like sulfated GAGs (Coy et al., 2008; Mondejar et al., 2013; Zumoffen et al., 2013). All these proteins are abundantly present in the OF around the ovulation time (Mahe et al., 2022). In addition, OVGP1 and members of the heat shock protein (HSP) and protein disulfite isomerase (PDI) families also interact with spermatozoa in both parts of the oviduct (Mahe et al., 2023a) and may modulate sperm adhesion to the zona pellucida. Lactotransferrin has been shown to interact with both spermatozoa and oocytes, causing a significant inhibition of sperm-zona pellucida interaction in humans (Zumoffen et al., 2013). Besides, many of the proteins found abundantly in the OF and with potential contributions to monospermic fertilization have also been identified in oviductal EVs (Alcântara-Neto et al., 2020b). Oviductal EVs interact with the cumulus cells, zona pellucida, and oocyte, being able to cross the zona pellucida and transferring the protein cargo to the oocyte (Alcântara-Neto et al., 2020b). It has been shown that EVs can deliver OVGP1 into the oocyte, which may be a component of the polyspermy regulatory mechanism (Alcântara-Neto et al., 2020b).

## After fertilization

Evidence from different species showed that embryos produced *in vitro*, either from oocytes matured *in vivo* or *in vitro*, are less competent than those developed *in vivo*. In cattle for example, clear differences in morphology and ultrastructure (Fair et al., 2001; Abe et al., 2002; Rizos et al., 2002a, b), energy metabolism (Gardner, 1998; Khurana and Niemann, 2000; Melo-Sterza and Poehland, 2021), gene expression (Knijn et al., 2005; Smith et al., 2009; Driver et al., 2012; Gad et al., 2012), methylation patterns (Salilew-Wondim et al., 2018), and protein composition (Banliat et al., 2022) have been reported between IVP embryos and their *in vivo* counterparts. Furthermore, the ability of bovine IVP embryos to survive after cryopreservation is lower than that of their *in vivo* counterparts (Rizos et al., 2008; Ferre et al., 2020).

On the other hand, the co-culture of IVP embryos with OECs improves blastocyst formation and enhances their cryotolerance in cattle (Cordova et al., 2014b; Schmaltz-Panneau et al., 2015; García et al., 2017; Pranomphon et al., 2024b) and pigs (Lorenzo et al., 2024), evidencing the beneficial effect of the oviductal secretions and/or physical milieu provided by the oviduct epithelium on embryo quality. This raises the key question of what in the oviductal microenvironment is so crucial for achieving optimal embryo development?

## A short stay in the oviduct shapes further embryo development

Embryos spend only a few days in the oviduct before entering the uterus, from 2 days in pigs to 6 days in horse (Table 2), but with a remarkable impact on their development and quality. In cattle, culture of embryos with OEC monolayers (Cordova et al., 2014a), oviduct epithelial spheroids (Pranomphon et al., 2024a), or in OEC-conditioned media (Senn et al., 2024) for the first 3-4 days was enough to improve blastocyst formation and quality on day 8 post-IVF. The use of OEC monolayers on days 1-4 post-IVF led to higher blastocyst rates than days 4-8 or the entire culture time (Cordova et al., 2014a), suggesting that a short initial priming by oviduct secretions is enough to produce long-lasting beneficial effects on embryo development. This was also observed in other species. In sheep, OEC explants during the first 4 days of development increased the blastocyst rates on day 8 compared to controls (Dashti et al., 2016). In pigs, culturing IVF zygotes during the initial two days of culture with OECs (Lorenzo et al., 2024) or oviduct EVs (Alcântara-Neto et al., 2022) was enough to enhance blastocyst rates on day 7. In the same line, embryo co-culture with isthmic epithelial spheroids
for the first 4 days of development improved the blastocyst rates at 7 days, and this was observed under both 5% and 20% oxygen (Pranomphon et al., 2024b). Furthermore, the transcriptomic analysis of blastocysts showed that compared to the massive effect of oviduct spheroids, the effect of co-culture time was much lower (hundreds vs. a dozen of differentially expressed genes), indicating that the presence of OECs beyond the 16-cell stage had little additional impact on the number of modulated genes (Pranomphon et al., 2024b). However, the functional analysis revealed that the impacted pathways were more significant after 7 than 4 days of co-culture, indicating that a longer co-culture time did not change the activated pathways but rather the magnitude of gene expression changes (Pranomphon et al., 2024b).

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Embryonic stage of zygotic genome activation (ZGA), time in the oviduct relative to ovulation, and developmental stage on entering the uterus in mammalian species.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Cattle</th><th>Pig</th><th>Sheep</th><th>Goat</th><th>Horse</th><th>Rabbit</th><th>Human</th><th>Mice</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Onset of major ZGA</td><td>8-cell</td><td>4-cell</td><td>8-16 cell</td><td>4-8 cell</td><td>8-cell</td><td>8-cell</td><td>4-cell</td><td>2-cell</td></tr><tr><td>Duration of stay in the oviduct (days)</td><td>3-4</td><td>≈ 2</td><td>3-4</td><td>4<br>2-2.5</td><td>5-6</td><td>2-3</td><td>3-3.5</td><td>3-3.5</td></tr><tr><td>Embryo stage on entering the uterus</td><td>8-16 cell</td><td>4-cell</td><td>8-16 cell</td><td>12-cell</td><td>Morula - blastocyst</td><td>Morula-blastocyst</td><td>12-16 cell</td><td>Blastocyst</td></tr><tr><td>References</td><td>(Betteridge, 1995; Gad et al., 2012)</td><td>(Tománek et al., 1989)</td><td>(Crosby et al., 1988; Betteridge, 1995)</td><td>(Betteridge, 1995; Deng et al., 2020)</td><td>(Betteridge, 1995; Goszczynski et al., 2022)</td><td>(Betteridge, 1995; Pacheco-Trigon et al., 2002)</td><td>(Betteridge, 1995; Jukam et al., 2017)</td><td>(Betteridge, 1995; Jukam et al., 2017)</td></tr></tbody></table>

Day 0: ovulation.

Additionally, the culture of cattle embryos with endometrial epithelial cell-conditioned media on days 4-8 post-IVF was recently reported to increase blastocyst formation (Senn et al., 2024). However, the greatest impact on embryo development and quality was obtained after pre-culture in OEC-conditioned media on days 1-3 (Senn et al., 2024), suggesting that reproducing the sequential exposure to oviductal and then endometrial secretions is optimal for embryo development. Time lapse video evidenced that OEC-conditioned media on days 1-3, but not later exposure to uterine secretions, reduced the time to morula compaction and blastocyst formation (Senn et al., 2024). These results suggest that oviduct secretions accelerate further development. Additionally, exposure to OEC conditioned medium decreased the proportion of apoptotic cells, concomitant with an increase in embryo cell numbers and the expression of genes inhibiting apoptosis in bovine blastocysts (Sidrat et al., 2020). Similarly, exposure to oviduct epithelial spheroids during *in vitro* development inhibited genes known to initiate cell apoptosis, like caspase 8 (CASP8), and induced the expression of others with anti-apoptotic functions, like caveolin 1 (CAV1) and nuclear protein 1 transcriptional regulator (NUPR1) in bovine embryos (Pranomphon et al., 2024b).

## Key aspects of the oviduct milieu: specific compartment functions, dynamic microflows, and low oxygen tension

The early embryo migrates from the ampulla to the isthmus during its early development. During this time, the embryo-maternal interactions are likely to be region-specific. In mice, a recent single-cell RNA sequencing of oviduct cells revealed that the ampulla and isthmus have distinct transcriptomic signatures and fetal origins (Ford et al., 2021), suggesting that the oviduct should rather be considered as two organs with distinct physiological roles. In heifers at day 2.5 after insemination, all embryos recovered were located at the beginning of the isthmus (Rodriguez-Alonso et al., 2019). Furthermore, EVs from the isthmus maintained higher blastocyst survival after vitrification compared to those from ampulla in cattle (Lopera-Vasquez et al., 2017a). In sheep, a higher proportion of expanded and hatched blastocysts, and
with a greater number of cells, were obtained with isthmic compared to ampullar explants in co-culture (Dashti et al., 2016). Altogether, these data indicate a greater effect of the isthmus on embryo quality compared to other oviduct compartments.

The oviduct is filled with tubal fluid, which not only nourishes and protects the embryo, but also facilitates the embryo's transport into the uterus. The volume of fluid of the whole oviduct in the peri-ovulatory period is around 40 µL in cattle and 15 µL in sheep, including less than 5 µL for the isthmus (personal data and (Teteau et al., 2022)). That means that the embryo(s) develop in a semi-fluid microenvironment in contact with the epithelial cells of the mucosa folds (Figure 1). The microfluidic functioning of the oviduct is an important aspect that has been relatively neglected so far. Thanks to the ciliary beating of multiciliated cells and muscular contractions, the tiny volume of luminal secretions is continuously brewed and renewed (Saint-Dizier et al., 2019). Recently, dynamic microfluid culture systems (with average flow rates of 18 nL/min) have been reported to improve the development and quality of bovine, murine, and human embryos compared to static systems (Alegretti et al., 2024). On the contrary, culturing embryos with OF at relatively high concentrations (>2.5%) in a static system had a toxic effect on cattle embryo development (Lopera-Vasquez et al., 2017b), highlighting the importance of medium renewal around the embryos. In this regard, Pranomphon et al. proposed that the beneficial effects on embryo development observed after co-culturing embryos with oviduct spheroids might be due to the capacity of the oviduct spheroids to maintain their outward ciliary beating, moving in suspension, and recreating microflows around embryos (Pranomphon et al., 2024c) (Figure 6).

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Bright-field picture of a bovine hatching blastocyst (on the right) that developed in co-culture with isthmic epithelial spheroids (two are visible on the left) maintained in suspension in the culture medium thanks to outward ciliary beating.</figcaption></figure>

The oxygen tension in the oviduct lumen has been reported to range between 2 and 8% in various mammalian species (Fischer and Bavister, 1993), and embryos are typically cultured in incubators with oxygen regulation (5% CO₂ and 5% O₂). However, OECs typically grow in incubators without oxygen regulation, thus with an oxygen level around 18-20%. The actual needs of OECs are probably intermediate, as the blood capillaries under their basal membrane continuously provide them with oxygen *in vivo*. It has been pointed out that the supporting effect of OECs on embryo development may be associated with their oxygen consumption in the culture medium, reproducing the low oxygen tension in the oviduct lumen. Using incubators without oxygen regulation, blastocyst yields were systematically improved after co-
culture with OEC monolayers (Cordova et al., 2014b; Schmaltz-Panneau et al., 2015) or spheroids (Pranomphon et al., 2024b, c). Recent data comparing 5% and 20% oxygen reported very close blastocyst rates, total cell numbers, and gene expression after co-culture with oviduct epithelial spheroids for 7 days (Pranomphon et al., 2024b), indicating that oxygen regulation is not needed if embryos are co-cultured with OECs up to the blastocyst stage. The oxygen consumption may be reproduced with other cells and is not tissue specific. However, although the first cleavages can be supported equally by OECs and other somatic cells such as fibroblasts, a marked improvement in further embryo development and viability was observed with OEC co-culture in sheep (Gandolfi and Moor, 1987). An improvement in blastocyst total cell numbers and gene expression was also observed after co-culture with OEC spheroids compared with controls without cells under both 5% and 20% oxygen (Pranomphon et al., 2024b). These findings indicate that beyond oxygen consumption, the oviduct epithelium exerts through its secretions a specific action on embryo quality.

The oviduct epithelium synthesizes and secretes several antioxidant enzymes into its lumen, including glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and catalase (Lapointe and Bilodeau, 2003; Schmaltz-Panneau et al., 2015; Lamy et al., 2016a; Mahe et al., 2022), and antioxidant activities were measured in the OF (Lapointe and Bilodeau, 2003). Co-culture of embryos with OECs (Cordova et al., 2014b) or supplementation of the medium with OF (Hamdi et al., 2018) or OEC-derived EVs (Fang et al., 2022) resulted in an increased expression of enzymes involved in ROS scavenging, like glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1) or superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), in bovine and porcine embryos, with a concomitant decrease in ROS levels in the embryonic cells (Fang et al., 2022; Lorenzo et al., 2024). This suggest that oviduct secretions stimulate the expression of antioxidant pathways in embryonic cells in addition to their probable direct antioxidant activity.

## The oviduct milieu modulates the activation of the zygotic genome

A major event in an embryo's life is the initiation of its own transcriptional program, a process called zygotic genome activation (ZGA). For most mammalian species, the ZGA occurs when embryos are still in the oviduct (Table 2) and developmental arrest is often observed during ZGA in IVP embryos. A comprehensive proteomic analysis of early bovine embryos showed that although *in vivo*- and *in vitro*-derived embryos start their ZGA at the same time, after the 8-cell stage, the increase in proteins involved in RNA metabolism and translation was much slower in *in vivo*-derived embryos but resulted in the same total number of proteins at the blastocyst stage (Banliat et al., 2022). These results were globally in accordance with the "quiet embryo" hypothesis, in which a premature or an excessive activation of the embryonic genome, in response to an unfavorable environment, decreases the ability of an embryo to pursue development (Baumann et al., 2007). Thus, beyond the source of oocytes, known to have a major effect on ZGA (Gad et al., 2012; Dorfeshan et al., 2018), there is evidence that the environment to which zygotes are exposed has also a great impact on their genome reprogramming and resulting blastocysts (Rizos et al., 2002b; Dalvit et al., 2005; Gad et al., 2012; Cordova et al., 2014b; Lonergan and Forde, 2014; Rodríguez-Alonso et al., 2020; Pranomphon et al., 2024b). For instance, exposure to OF during the first 4 days of culture was shown to promote the expression of DNA methyltransferases (DNMT) 1 and 3A in bovine embryos at the 4-cell (Barrera et al., 2017) and blastocyst (Hamdi et al., 2018) stages. The DNA methylation pattern of several blastocyst genes was also altered by the presence of OF (Barrera et al., 2017).

## The oviduct plays an active role in supporting the embryo metabolism

The most crucial nutrients for the early embryo are carbohydrates and amino acids, which provide energy and substrates for protein synthesis and act as players of the epigenetic programming (Milazzotto et al., 2020). Bovine embryos start to consume pyruvate and glucose around the time of ZGA. Then, around the 16-cell to compact morula, they enter the uterus, where concentrations of glucose are higher than in the OF (Hugentobler et al., 2008). At this
time, a significant increase in the oxidation of pyruvate, glucose, and lactose has been reported
in embryos (Gardner, 1998; Khurana and Niemann, 2000). Transcriptomic studies on bovine
embryos evidenced that a majority of differentially expressed genes between *in vivo*- and *in
vitro*-derived blastocysts were involved in metabolic processes, including carbohydrate
metabolism but also lipid, nucleic acid, and amino acid metabolism (Driver et al., 2012;
Gad et al., 2012). Similarly, in porcine embryos, a high proportion of genes related to
metabolism was dysregulated when *in vivo*- and *in vitro*-derived blastocysts were compared,
most of which were upregulated *in vivo* (Miles et al., 2008). The proteomic analysis of bovine
embryos confirmed that *in vivo*-derived embryos, as soon as the 8-12 cell stage, produce higher
amounts of key glycolytic enzymes than their *in vitro* counterparts (Banliat et al., 2022),
suggesting a more active carbohydrate metabolism when in contact with the oviduct
epithelium. In accordance, IVP embryos cultured in OEC-conditioned medium showed four
times higher expression of enzymes involved in ATP production, like pyruvate dehydrogenase
and glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (GLUD1), compared to controls (Sidrat et al., 2020). The
expression of glucose transporters GLUT1 and GLUT5 was also increased in bovine embryos
after 8 days of co-culture with OEC (Cordova et al., 2014a).

Altogether, these results indicate that the oviduct epithelium supports embryo growth
through an inhibition of cell apoptosis, mitigates oxidative stress through oxygen consumption
and specific antioxidant secretions, modulates ZGA, and favors the transition from an oxidative
to a glycolytic metabolism. Last but not least, recent data indicate that oviduct EVs may
reproduce or even improve the effects of oviduct secretions on embryo quality in pigs
(Alcântara-Neto et al., 2022) and cattle (Lopera-Vásquez et al., 2016; Sidrat et al., 2020). Bovine
blastocysts exposed to oviduct EVs during early development displayed less cell apoptosis
(Sidrat et al., 2020) and significant changes in their phospholipid composition (Banliat et al.,
2020a), mitochondrial activity (Sidrat et al., 2020), and gene expression (Bauersachs et al.,
2020), which are key factors for further development and conceptus implantation. The
underlying mechanisms of EVs probably include direct incorporation of metabolites
(Gatien et al., 2019), proteins (Alminana et al., 2017; Banliat et al., 2020b), and microRNAs
(Bauersachs et al., 2020) conveyed to the embryonic cells.

Conclusion and future perspectives

This review shows manyfold evidence for the negative impacts of bypassing the oviduct
milieu during *in vitro* embryo production and emphasizes the enormous benefits of mimicking
the gamete/embryo-oviductal interactions *in vitro* on sperm selection and embryo
development. Altogether, the collected information reveals the unique role of the oviduct,
which, to date, cannot be fully replicated *in vitro*. Besides, the current knowledge indicates that
additional efforts are needed regarding mimicking the *in vivo* oviduct milieu in ART to overcome
the negative impact of the *in vitro* conditions.

To mimic the *in vivo* oviduct milieu *in vitro* is an ambitious and difficult task, since as we
discussed here, should cover different events occurring before, during, and after fertilization.
Besides, it should consider or involve the various effects of the oviduct epithelium and its
secretions on these different processes in gametes and embryos. Finally, new strategies should
provide a population of selected sperm with improved ability to fertilize the egg and obtain an
embryo of good quality. The most recent *in vitro* models and technologies proposed so far,
such as the use of oviduct organoids (Bourdon et al., 2021; Lawson et al., 2023; Gatimel et al.,
2025), or a 3D-printing microfluidic "oviduct-on-a-chip" (Ferraz et al., 2018) brought new
insights on the oviduct physiology and have demonstrated the ability to enhance sperm
survival or motility (Lawson et al., 2023; Gatimel et al., 2025) and embryo quality (Ferraz et al.,
2018). However, they are associated with enormous costs and time, and involve difficult
experiments, making it very challenging to use in practical applications of ART. Lessons learned
from the use of these models or technologies in obtaining gametes and embryos of better
quality can be used to develop more feasible models and less cost-effective approaches that
can be translated to increased fertilization and pregnancy rates in ART. On the other side, to
overcome the impact of the missing oviduct in ARTs, efforts need to be directed to get deeper
insights into the plasticity of gametes and embryos to cope with the *in vitro* milieu. Besides, unveiling the fundamental oviductal secretions and components that boost spermatozoa and embryos at the molecular level, will help to develop new *in vitro* supplements for better sperm selection, fertilization, and embryo culture.

## Acknowledgements

The authors warmly thank Ludivine Laffont and Guillaume Tsikis for their valuable technical support, Thierry Meylheuc for his expertise in scanning electron microscopy at the Prophyle platform of the Avignon INRAE center, and all the students who participated in this work with great and helpful enthusiasm.

## Data availability statement

No research data were used.

## References

* Abe H, Yamashita S, Satoh T, Hoshi H. Accumulation of cytoplasmic lipid droplets in bovine embryos and cryotolerance of embryos developed in different culture systems using serum-free or serum-containing media. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002;61(1):57-66. http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1131. PMid:11774376.

* Alcântara-Neto A, Fernandez-Rufete M, Corbin E, Tsikis G, Uzbekov R, Garanina AS, Coy P, Alminana C, Mermillod P. Oviduct fluid extracellular vesicles regulate polyspermy during porcine in vitro fertilisation. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2019;32(4):409-18. http://doi.org/10.1071/RD19058. PMid:31775998.

* Alcântara-Neto AS, Cuello C, Uzbekov R, Bauersachs S, Mermillod P, Almiñana C. Oviductal extracellular vesicles enhance porcine in vitro embryo development by modulating the embryonic transcriptome. Biomolecules. 2022;12(9):1300. http://doi.org/10.3390/biom12091300. PMid:36139139.

* Alcântara-Neto AS, Schmaltz L, Caldas E, Blache MC, Mermillod P, Almiñana C. Porcine oviductal extracellular vesicles interact with gametes and regulate sperm motility and survival. Theriogenology. 2020a;155:240-55. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.05.043. PMid:32791377.

* Alcântara-Neto AS, Fernandez-Rufete M, Corbin E, Tsikis G, Uzbekov R, Garanina AS, Coy P, Almiñana C, Mermillod P. Oviduct fluid extracellular vesicles regulate polyspermy during porcine in vitro fertilisation. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2020b;32(4):409-18. http://doi.org/10.1071/RD19058. PMid:31775998.

* Al-Dossary AA, Strehler EE, Martin-Deleon PA. Expression and secretion of plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase 4a (PMCA4a) during murine estrus: association with oviductal exosomes and uptake in sperm. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80181. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080181. PMid:24244642.

* Al-Dossary AA, Bathala P, Caplan JL, Martin-Deleon PA. Oviductosome-sperm membrane interaction in cargo delivery: detection of fusion and underlying molecular players using three-dimensional super-resolution structured illumination microscopy (SR-SIM). J Biol Chem. 2015;290(29):17710-23. http://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.633156. PMid:26023236.

* Alegretti JR, Rocha AMD, Nogueira-de-Souza NC, Kato N, Barros BC, Motta ELA, Serafini PC, Takayama S, Smith GD. Controlled dynamic microfluidic culture of murine, bovine, and human embryos improves development: proof-of-concept studies. Cells. 2024;13(24):13. http://doi.org/10.3390/cells13242080. PMid:39768173.

* Almiñana C, Corbin E, Tsikis G, Alcântara-Neto AS, Labas V, Reynaud K, Galio L, Uzbekov R, Garanina AS, Druart X, Mermillod P. Oviduct extracellular vesicles protein content and their role during oviduct-embryo cross-talk. Reproduction. 2017;154(3):153-68. http://doi.org/10.1530/REP-17-0054. PMid:28630101.

* Ambruosi B, Accogli G, Douet C, Canepa S, Pascal G, Monget P, Moros Nicolás C, Holmskov U, Mollenhauer J, Robbe-Masselot C, Vidal O, Desantis S, Goudet G. Deleted in malignant brain tumor 1 is secreted in the oviduct and involved in the mechanism of fertilization in equine and porcine species. Reproduction. 2013;146(2):119-33. http://doi.org/10.1530/REP-13-0007. PMid:23722152.
Ardon F, Markello RD, Hu L, Deutsch ZI, Tung CK, Wu M, Suarez SS. Dynamics of bovine sperm interaction with epithelium differ between oviductal isthmus and ampulla. *Biol Reprod*. 2016;95(4):90.
http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.116.140632. PMid:27605344.

Ballester L, Romero-Aguirregomezcorta J, Soriano-Úbeda C, Matás C, Romar R, Coy P. Timing of oviductal fluid collection, steroid concentrations, and sperm preservation method affect porcine in vitro fertilization efficiency. *Fertil Steril*. 2014;102(6):1762-8.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.009. PMid:25241366.

Banliat C, Le Bourhis D, Bernardi O, Tomas D, Labas V, Salvetti P, Guyonnet B, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Oviduct fluid extracellular vesicles change the phospholipid composition of bovine embryos developed *In Vitro*. *Int J Mol Sci*. 2020a;21(15):21. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155326.
PMid:32727074.

Banliat C, Tsikis G, Labas V, Teixeira-Gomes AP, Com E, Lavigne R, Pineau C, Guyonnet B, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Identification of 56 proteins involved in embryo-maternal interactions in the bovine oviduct. *Int J Mol Sci*. 2020b;21(2):466. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020466. PMid:31940782.

Banliat C, Mahé C, Lavigne R, Com E, Pineau C, Labas V, Guyonnet B, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. The proteomic analysis of bovine embryos developed in vivo or in vitro reveals the contribution of the maternal environment to early embryo. *BMC Genomics*. 2022;23(1):839.
http://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-09076-5. PMid:36536309.

Barrera AD, García EV, Hamdi M, Sánchez-Calabuig MJ, López-Cardona ÁP, Balvís NF, Rizos D, Gutiérrez-Adán A. Embryo culture in presence of oviductal fluid induces DNA methylation changes in bovine blastocysts. *Reproduction*. 2017;154(1):1-12. http://doi.org/10.1530/REP-16-0651. PMid:28408706.

Bathala P, Fereshteh Z, Li K, Al-Dossary AA, Galileo DS, Martin-DeLeon PA. Oviductal extracellular vesicles (oviductosomes, OVS) are conserved in humans: murine OVS play a pivotal role in sperm capacitation and fertility. *Mol Hum Reprod*. 2018;24(3):143-57. http://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gay003.
PMid:29370405.

Batista RI, Moro LN, Corbin E, Alminana C, Souza-Fabjan JM, Figueirêdo Freitas VJ, Mermillod P. Combination of oviduct fluid and heparin to improve monospermic zygotes production during porcine in vitro fertilization. *Theriogenology*. 2016;86(2):495-502.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.01.031. PMid:26964763.

Bauersachs S, Mermillod P, Almiñana C. The oviductal extracellular vesicles' RNA cargo regulates the bovine embryonic transcriptome. *Int J Mol Sci*. 2020;21(4):21. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041303.
PMid:32075098.

Baumann CG, Morris DG, Sreenan JM, Leese HJ. The quiet embryo hypothesis: molecular characteristics favoring viability. *Mol Reprod Dev*. 2007;74(10):1345-53. http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20604.
PMid:17342740.

Bergqvist AS, Rodríguez-Martínez H. Sulphated glycosaminoglycans (S-GAGs) and syndecans in the bovine oviduct. *Anim Reprod Sci*. 2006;93(1-2):46-60.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.06.029. PMid:16098694.

Bergqvist AS, Ballester J, Johannisson A, Hernandez M, Lundeheim N, Rodríguez-Martínez H. *In vitro* capacitation of bull spermatozoa by oviductal fluid and its components. *Zygote*. 2006;14(3):259-73.
http://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199406003777. PMid:16822337.

Betteridge KJ. Phylogeny, ontogeny and embryo transfer. *Theriogenology*. 1995;44(8):1061-98.
http://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00322-Y.

Bourdon G, Cadoret V, Charpigny G, Couturier-Tarrade A, Dalbies-Tran R, Flores MJ, Froment P, Raliou M, Reynaud K, Saint-Dizier M, Jouneau A. Progress and challenges in developing organoids in farm animal species for the study of reproduction and their applications to reproductive biotechnologies. *Vet Res*. 2021;52(1):42. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-020-00891-w. PMid:33691745.

Bragança GM, Alcântara-Neto AS, Batista RITP, Brandão FZ, Freitas VJF, Mermillod P, Souza-Fabjan JMG. Oviduct fluid during IVF moderately modulates polyspermy in in vitro-produced goat embryos during the non-breeding season. *Theriogenology*. 2021;168:59-65.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.03.022. PMid:33857909.

Bromfield JJ. Seminal fluid and reproduction: much more than previously thought. *J Assist Reprod Genet*. 2014;31(6):627-36. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0243-y. PMid:24830788.

Bureau M, Bailey JL, Sirard MA. Influence of oviductal cells and conditioned medium on porcine gametes. *Zygote*. 2000;8(2):139-44. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199400000915. PMid:10857584.
Camara Pirez M, Steele H, Reese S, Kölle S. Bovine sperm-oviduct interactions are characterized by specific sperm behaviour, ultrastructure and tubal reactions which are impacted by sex sorting. *Sci Rep.* 2020;10(1):16522. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73592-1. PMid:33020549.

Cesari A, Kaiser GG, Mucci N, Mutto A, Vincenti A, Fornés MW, Alberio RH. Integrated morphophysiological assessment of two methods for sperm selection in bovine embryo production in vitro. *Theriogenology*. 2006;66(5):1185-93. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.03.029. PMid:16647751.

Cordova A, Perreau C, Uzbekova S, Ponsart C, Locatelli Y, Mermillod P. Development rate and gene expression of IVP bovine embryos cocultured with bovine oviduct epithelial cells at early or late stage of preimplantation development. *Theriogenology*. 2014a;81(9):1163-73. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.01.012. PMid:24629595.

Cordova A, Perreau C, Uzbekova S, Ponsart C, Locatelli Y, Mermillod P. Development rate and gene expression of IVP bovine embryos cocultured with bovine oviduct epithelial cells at early or late stage of preimplantation development. *Theriogenology*. 2014b;81(9):1163-73. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.01.012. PMid:24629595.

Coy P, Cánovas S, Mondéjar I, Saavedra MD, Romar R, Grullón L, Matás C, Avilés M. Oviduct-specific glycoprotein and heparin modulate sperm-zona pellucida interaction during fertilization and contribute to the control of polyspermy. *Proc Natl Acad Sci USA*. 2008;105(41):15809-14. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804422105. PMid:18838686.

Crosby IM, Gandolfi F, Moor RM. Control of protein synthesis during early cleavage of sheep embryos. *J Reprod Fertil.* 1988;82(2):769-75. http://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0820769. PMid:3361510.

Daigneault BW, McNamara KA, Purdy PH, Krisher RL, Knox RV, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Miller DJ. Enhanced fertility prediction of cryopreserved boar spermatozoa using novel sperm function assessment. *Andrology*. 2015;3(3):558-68. http://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12035. PMid:25914302.

Dalvit GC, Cetica PD, Pintos LN, Beconi MT. Reactive oxygen species in bovine embryo in vitro production. *Biocell*. 2005;29(2):209-12. http://doi.org/10.32604/biocell.2005.29.209. PMid:16187501.

Dashti S, Zare Shahneh A, Kohram H, Zhandi M, Dadashpour Davachi N. Differential influence of ovine oviduct ampullary and isthmic derived epithelial cells on in vitro early embryo development and kinetic. *Small Rumin Res.* 2016;136:197-201. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.02.007.

De Pauw IM, Van Soom A, Laevens H, Verberckmoes S, de Kruif A. Sperm binding to epithelial oviduct explants in bulls with different nonreturn rates investigated with a new in vitro model. *Biol Reprod.* 2002;67(4):1073-9. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod67.4.1073. PMid:12297520.

Deng M, Zhang G, Cai Y, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Meng F, Wang F, Wan Y. DNA methylation dynamics during zygotic genome activation in goat. *Theriogenology*. 2020;156:144-54. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.07.008. PMid:32731098.

Donnellan EM, Lonergan P, Meade KG, Fair S. An ex-vivo assessment of differential sperm transport in the female reproductive tract between high and low fertility bulls. *Theriogenology*. 2022;181:42-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.01.011. PMid:35063920.

Dorfeshan P, Ghaffari Novin M, Salehi M, Masteri Farahani R, Fadaei-Fathabadi F, Sehatti R. The effects of *In Vitro* maturation technique on the expression of genes involved in embryonic genome activation of human embryos. *Cell J*. 2018;20(1):90-7. PMid:29308624.

Driver AM, Peñagaricano F, Huang W, Ahmad KR, Hackbart KS, Wiltbank MC, Khatib H. RNA-Seq analysis uncovers transcriptomic variations between morphologically similar in vivo- and in vitro-derived bovine blastocysts. *BMC Genomics*. 2012;13(1):118. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-118. PMid:22452724.

Dutta S, Aoki K, Doungkamchan K, Tiemeyer M, Bovin N, Miller DJ. Sulfated Lewis A trisaccharide on oviduct membrane glycoproteins binds bovine sperm and lengthens sperm lifespan. *J Biol Chem.* 2019a;294(36):13445-63. http://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.007695. PMid:31337705.

Dutta S, Majzoub A, Agarwal A. Oxidative stress and sperm function: a systematic review on evaluation and management. *Arab J Urol.* 2019b;17(2):87-97. http://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1599624. PMid:31285919.

Ealy AD, Wooldridge LK, McCoski SR. BOARD INVITED REVIEW: post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle. *J Anim Sci.* 2019;97(6):2555-68. http://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz116. PMid:30968113.
Ekhlasi-Hundrieser M, Gohr K, Wagner A, Tsolova M, Petrunkina A, Töpfer-Petersen E. Spermadhesin AQN1 is a candidate receptor molecule involved in the formation of the oviductal sperm reservoir in the pig. *Biol Reprod.* 2005;73(3):536-45. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.105.040824.
PMid:15888732.

Ellington JE, Evenson DP, Wright RW Jr, Jones AE, Schneider CS, Hiss GA, Brisbois RS. Higher-quality human sperm in a sample selectively attach to oviduct (fallopian tube) epithelial cells in vitro. *Fertil Steril.* 1999;71(5):924-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00095-3. PMid:10231058.

El-Shahat KH, Taysser MI, Badr MR, Zaki KA. Effect of oviduct and follicular fluids on ram sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction in vitro. *Int J Vet Sci Med.* 2018;6(Suppl. 1):S57-62.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2017.12.002. PMid:30761322.

El-Sokary MMM, Shehata SF, Mahmoud KGM. Heparin and progesterone exert synergistic effects to improve the *In-Vitro* fertilization rate of bovine sperm bound to oviduct cell aggregates from the isthmus. *Vet Sci.* 2022;9(7):9. http://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9070372. PMid:35878389.

Ezzati M, Djahanbakhch O, Arian S, Carr BR. Tubal transport of gametes and embryos: a review of physiology and pathophysiology. *J Assist Reprod Genet.* 2014;31(10):1337-47.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0309-x. PMid:25117646.

Fair T, Lonergan P, Dinnyes A, Cottell DC, Hyttel P, Ward FA, Boland MP. Ultrastructure of bovine blastocysts following cryopreservation: effect of method of blastocyst production. *Mol Reprod Dev.* 2001;58(2):186-95. http://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200102)58:2<186::AID-MRD8>3.0.CO;2-N.
PMid:11139231.

Fang X, Tanga BM, Bang S, Seong G, Saadeldin IM, Lee S, Cho J. Oviduct epithelial cells-derived extracellular vesicles improve preimplantation developmental competence of in vitro produced porcine parthenogenetic and cloned embryos. *Mol Reprod Dev.* 2022;89(1):54-65.
http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23550. PMid:34843136.

Fang X, Bang S, Tanga BM, Seo C, Zhou D, Seong G, Saadeldin IM, Lee S, Cui XS, Cho J. Oviduct epithelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles promote the developmental competence of IVF porcine embryos. *Mol Med Rep.* 2023;27(6):122. http://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2023.13009. PMid:37203391.

Ferraz MAMM, Rho HS, Hemerich D, Henning HHW, van Tol HTA, Hölker M, Besenfelder U, Mokry M, Vos PLAM, Stout TAE, Le Gac S, Gadella BM. An oviduct-on-a-chip provides an enhanced in vitro environment for zygote genome reprogramming. *Nat Commun.* 2018;9(1):4934.
http://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07119-8. PMid:30467383.

Ferraz MAMM, Carothers A, Dahal R, Noonan MJ, Songsasen N. Oviductal extracellular vesicles interact with the spermatozoon's head and mid-piece and improves its motility and fertilizing ability in the domestic cat. *Sci Rep.* 2019;9(1):9484. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45857-x. PMid:31263184.

Ferré LB, Kjelland ME, Strøbech LB, Hyttel P, Mermillod P, Ross PJ. Review: Recent advances in bovine in vitro embryo production: reproductive biotechnology history and methods. *Animal.* 2020;14(5):991-1004. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119002775. PMid:31760966.

First NL, Short RE, Peters JB, Stratman FW. Transport and loss of boar spermatozoa in the reproductive tract of the sow. *J Anim Sci.* 1968;27(4):1037-40. http://doi.org/10.2527/jas1968.2741037x.

Fischer B, Bavister BD. Oxygen tension in the oviduct and uterus of rhesus monkeys, hamsters and rabbits. *J Reprod Fertil.* 1993;99(2):673-9. http://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0990673. PMid:8107053.

Ford MJ, Harwalkar K, Pacis AS, Maunsell H, Wang YC, Badescu D, Teng K, Yamanaka N, Bouchard M, Ragoussis J, Yamanaka Y. Oviduct epithelial cells constitute two developmentally distinct lineages that are spatially separated along the distal-proximal axis. *Cell Rep.* 2021;36(10):109677.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109677. PMid:34496237.

Franchi A, Moreno-Irusta A, Domínguez EM, Adre AJ, Giojalas LC. Extracellular vesicles from oviductal isthmus and ampulla stimulate the induced acrosome reaction and signaling events associated with capacitation in bovine spermatozoa. *J Cell Biochem.* 2020;121(4):2877-88.
http://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.29522. PMid:31692037.

Fujihara Y, Miyata H, Ikawa M. Factors controlling sperm migration through the oviduct revealed by gene-modified mouse models. *Exp Anim.* 2018;67(2):91-104. http://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.17-0153. PMid:29353867.

Fujihara Y, Noda T, Kobayashi K, Oji A, Kobayashi S, Matsumura T, Larasati T, Oura S, Kojima-Kita K, Yu Z, Matzuk MM, Ikawa M. Identification of multiple male reproductive tract-specific proteins that regulate sperm migration through the oviduct in mice. *Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.* 2019;116(37):18498-506. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908736116. PMid:31455729.
Gad A, Hoelker M, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Cinar U, Rings F, Held E, Dufort I, Sirard MA, Schellander K, Tesfaye D. Molecular mechanisms and pathways involved in bovine embryonic genome activation and their regulation by alternative in vivo and in vitro culture conditions. *Biol Reprod.* 2012;87(4):100. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.112.099697. PMid:22811576.

Gandolfi F, Moor RM. Stimulation of early embryonic development in the sheep by co-culture with oviduct epithelial cells. *J Reprod Fertil.* 1987;81(1):23-8. http://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0810023. PMid:3668954.

García EV, Hamdi M, Barrera AD, Sánchez-Calabuig MJ, Gutiérrez-Adán A, Rizos D. Bovine embryo-oviduct interaction in vitro reveals an early cross talk mediated by BMP signaling. *Reproduction*. 2017;153(5):631-43. http://doi.org/10.1530/REP-16-0654. PMid:28250237.

Gardner DK. Changes in requirements and utilization of nutrients during mammalian preimplantation embryo development and their significance in embryo culture. *Theriogenology*. 1998;49(1):83-102. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00404-4. PMid:10732123.

Gatien J, Mermillod P, Tsikis G, Bernardi O, Janati Idrissi S, Uzbekov R, Le Bourhis D, Salvetti P, Almiñana C, Saint-Dizier M. Metabolomic profile of oviductal extracellular vesicles across the estrous cycle in cattle. *Int J Mol Sci.* 2019;20(24):20. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246339. PMid:31888194.

Gatimel N, Perez G, Bruno E, Sagnat D, Rolland C, Tanguy-Le-Gac Y, Di Donato E, Racaud C, Léandri R, Bettiol C, Deraison C, Motta JP, Huyghe E, Vergnolle N. Human fallopian tube organoids provide a favourable environment for sperm motility. *Hum Reprod.* 2025;40(3):503-17. http://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae258. PMid:39792911.

Goldman EE, Ellington JE, Foote RH. Reaction of fresh and frozen bull spermatozoa incubated with fresh and frozen bovine oviduct epithelial cells. *Reprod Nutr Dev.* 1998;38(3):281-8. http://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19980308. PMid:9698279.

Goszczynski DE, Tinetti PS, Choi YH, Hinrichs K, Ross PJ. Genome activation in equine in vitro-produced embryos. *Biol Reprod.* 2022;106(1):66-82. http://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioab173. PMid:34515744.

Griffiths GS, Galileo DS, Reese K, Martin-Deleon PA. Investigating the role of murine epididymosomes and uterosomes in GPI-linked protein transfer to sperm using SPAM1 as a model. *Mol Reprod Dev.* 2008a;75(11):1627-36. http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20907. PMid:18384048.

Griffiths GS, Miller KA, Galileo DS, Martin-DeLeon PA. Murine SPAM1 is secreted by the estrous uterus and oviduct in a form that can bind to sperm during capacitation: acquisition enhances hyaluronic acid-binding ability and cumulus dispersal efficiency. *Reproduction*. 2008b;135(3):293-301. http://doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0340. PMid:18299422.

Gualtieri R, Talevi R. Selection of highly fertilization-competent bovine spermatozoa through adhesion to the Fallopian tube epithelium in vitro. *Reproduction*. 2003;125(2):251-8. http://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1250251. PMid:12578539.

Gwathmey TM, Ignotz GG, Mueller JL, Manjunath P, Suarez SS. Bovine seminal plasma proteins PDC-109, BSP-A3, and BSP-30-kDa share functional roles in storing sperm in the oviduct. *Biol Reprod.* 2006;75(4):501-7. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.106.053306. PMid:16790686.

Hamdi M, Lopera-Vasquez R, Maillo V, Sanchez-Calabuig MJ, Núnez C, Gutierrez-Adan A, Rizos D. Bovine oviductal and uterine fluid support in vitro embryo development. *Reprod Fertil Dev.* 2018;30(7):935-45. http://doi.org/10.1071/RD17286. PMid:29167013.

Hawk HW, Conley HH, Cooper BS. Number of sperm in the oviducts, uterus, and cervix of the mated ewe as affected by exogenous estradiol. *J Anim Sci.* 1978;46(5):1300-8. http://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.4651300x. PMid:566749.

Hawk HW. Transport and fate of spermatozoa after insemination of cattle. *J Dairy Sci.* 1987;70(7):1487-503. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80173-X. PMid:3305615.

Holt WV, Fazeli A. Sperm storage in the female reproductive tract. *Annu Rev Anim Biosci.* 2016;4(1):291-310. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-021815-111350. PMid:26526545.

Hourcade JD, Pérez-Crespo M, Fernández-González R, Pintado B, Gutiérrez-Adán A. Selection against spermatozoa with fragmented DNA after postovulatory mating depends on the type of damage. *Reprod Biol Endocrinol.* 2010;8(1):9. http://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-9. PMid:20113521.

Huang VW, Zhao W, Lee CL, Lee CY, Lam KK, Ko JK, Yeung WS, Ho PC, Chiu PC. Cell membrane proteins from oviductal epithelial cell line protect human spermatozoa from oxidative damage. *Fertil Steril.* 2013;99(5):1444-1452.e3. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.056. PMid:23312221.
Hugentobler SA, Humpherson PG, Leese HJ, Sreenan JM, Morris DG. Energy substrates in bovine oviduct and uterine fluid and blood plasma during the oestrous cycle. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75(3):496-503.
http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20760. PMid:17926343.

Hughes JR, McMorrow KJ, Bovin N, Miller DJ. An oviduct glycan increases sperm lifespan by diminishing the production of ubiquinone and reactive oxygen speciesdagger. Biol Reprod. 2023;109(3):356-66.
http://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioad074. PMid:37427962.

Hunter RH. Pre-ovulatory arrest and peri-ovulatory redistribution of competent spermatozoa in the isthmus of the pig oviduct. J Reprod Fertil. 1984;72(1):203-11. http://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0720203.
PMid:6471049.

Hunter RH. Components of oviduct physiology in eutherian mammals. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012; 87(1):244-55. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00196.x. PMid:21883867.

Ignotz GG, Cho MY, Suarez SS. Annexins are candidate oviductal receptors for bovine sperm surface proteins and thus may serve to hold bovine sperm in the oviductal reservoir. Biol Reprod. 2007;77(6):906-13. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.107.062505. PMid:17715429.

Ito S, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto Y, Kimura K, Okuda K. Remodeling of bovine oviductal epithelium by mitosis of secretory cells. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;366(2):403-10. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-016-2432-8. PMid:27256395.

Jukam D, Shariati SAM, Skotheim JM. Zygotic genome activation in vertebrates. Dev Cell. 2017;42(4):316-32. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.07.026. PMid:28829942.

Kadirvel G, Machado SA, Korneli C, Collins E, Miller P, Bess KN, Aoki K, Tiemeyer M, Bovin N, Miller DJ. Porcine sperm bind to specific 6-sialylated biantennary glycans to form the oviduct reservoir. Biol Reprod. 2012;87(6):147. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.112.103879. PMid:23115267.

Kemp B, Soede NM. Consequences of variation in interval from insemination to ovulation on fertilization in pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1997;52:79-89. PMid:9602721.

Khurana NK, Niemann H. Energy metabolism in preimplantation bovine embryos derived in vitro or in vivo. Biol Reprod. 2000;62(4):847-56. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.4.847. PMid:10727252.

Knijn HM, Wrenzycki C, Hendriksen PJ, Vos PL, Zeinstra EC, van der Weijden GC, Niemann H, Dieleman SJ. In vitro and in vivo culture effects on mRNA expression of genes involved in metabolism and apoptosis in bovine embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2005;17(8):775-84. http://doi.org/10.1071/RD05038. PMid:16476204.

Kon Y, Iwata H, Shiono H, Matsubara K, Kurita A, Sakaguchi Y, Kuwayama T, Monji Y. Effect of carbohydrates on the ability of bull sperm to bind to bovine oviduct epithelial cells. Reprod Domest Anim. 2009;44(3):365-70. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.01013.x. PMid:18992102.

Kumaresan A, Johannisson A, Saravia F, Bergqvist AS. The effect of oviductal fluid on protein tyrosine phosphorylation in cryopreserved boar spermatozoa differs with the freezing method. Theriogenology. 2012;77(3):588-99. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.08.035. PMid:21982432.

Kumaresan A, Johannisson A, Humblot P, Bergqvist AS. Effect of bovine oviductal fluid on motility, tyrosine phosphorylation, and acrosome reaction in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2019;124:48-56. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.09.028. PMid:30343199.

Lamy J, Corbin E, Blache MC, Garanina AS, Uzbekov R, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Steroid hormones regulate sperm-oviduct interactions in the bovine. Reproduction. 2017;154(4):497-508.
http://doi.org/10.1530/REP-17-0328. PMid:28729465.

Lamy J, Labas V, Harichaux G, Tsikis G, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Regulation of the bovine oviductal fluid proteome. Reproduction. 2016a;152(6):629-44. http://doi.org/10.1530/REP-16-0397. PMid:27601716.

Lamy J, Liere P, Pianos A, Aprahamian F, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Steroid hormones in bovine oviductal fluid during the estrous cycle. Theriogenology. 2016b;86(6):1409-20.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.086. PMid:27262884.

Lange-Consiglio A, Capra E, Giuliani D, Canesi S, Funghi F, Bosi G, Cretich M, Frigerio R, Galbiati V, Cremonesi F. Endometrial and oviduct extra-cellular vescicles for in vitro equine sperm hyperactivation and oocyte fertilization. Theriogenology. 2022;194:35-45.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.09.023. PMid:36208536.

Lapointe J, Bilodeau JF. Antioxidant defenses are modulated in the cow oviduct during the estrous cycle. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(4):1157-64. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.007476. PMid:12606442.
Larasati T, Noda T, Fujihara Y, Shimada K, Tobita T, Yu Z, Matzuk MM, Ikawa M. Tmprss12 is required for sperm motility and uterotubal junction migration in mice. *Biol Reprod.* 2020;103(2):254-63.
http://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioaa060. PMid:32529245.

Lawson EF, Ghosh A, Blanch V, Gruppen CG, Aitken RJ, Lim R, Drury HR, Baker MA, Gibb Z, Tanwar PS. Establishment and characterization of oviductal organoids from farm and companion animalsdagger. *Biol Reprod.* 2023;108(6):854-65. http://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioad030.
PMid:36917225.

Leemans B, Gadella BM, Sostaric E, Nelis H, Stout TA, Hoogewijs M, Van Soom A. Oviduct binding and elevated environmental ph induce protein tyrosine phosphorylation in stallion spermatozoa. *Biol Reprod.* 2014;91(1):13. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.113.116418. PMid:24829033.

Lefebvre R, Lo MC, Suarez SS. Bovine sperm binding to oviductal epithelium involves fucose recognition. *Biol Reprod.* 1997;56(5):1198-204. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod56.5.1198. PMid:9160719.

Lonergan P, Forde N. Maternal-embryo interaction leading up to the initiation of implantation of pregnancy in cattle. *Animal.* 2014;8(Suppl. 1):64-9. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000470.
PMid:24679216.

Lopera-Vásquez R, Hamdi M, Fernandez-Fuertes B, Maillo V, Beltrán-Breña P, Calle A, Redruello A, López-Martín S, Gutierrez-Adán A, Yañez-Mó M, Ramirez MÁ, Rizos D. Extracellular vesicles from BOEC in in vitro embryo development and quality. *PLoS One.* 2016;11(2):e0148083.
http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148083. PMid:26845570.

Lopera-Vasquez R, Hamdi M, Maillo V, Gutierrez-Adan A, Bermejo-Alvarez P, Ramírez MÁ, Yáñez-Mó M, Rizos D. Effect of bovine oviductal extracellular vesicles on embryo development and quality in vitro. *Reproduction.* 2017a;153(4):461-70. http://doi.org/10.1530/REP-16-0384. PMid:28104825.

Lopera-Vasquez R, Hamdi M, Maillo V, Lloreda V, Coy P, Gutierrez-Adan A, Bermejo-Alvarez P, Rizos D. Effect of bovine oviductal fluid on development and quality of bovine embryos produced in vitro. *Reprod Fertil Dev.* 2017b;29(3):621-9. http://doi.org/10.1071/RD15238. PMid:26462440.

López-Úbeda R, García-Vázquez FA, Gadea J, Matás C. Oviductal epithelial cells selected boar sperm according to their functional characteristics. *Asian J Androl.* 2017;19(4):396-403.
http://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.173936. PMid:27232850.

Lorenzo MS, Teplitz GM, Luchetti CG, Cruzans PR, Bertonazzi A, Lombardo DM. The coculture of in vitro produced porcine embryos and oviductal epithelial cells improves blastocyst formation and modify embryo quality. *Theriogenology.* 2024;226:141-50.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.06.007. PMid:38885555.

Luño V, López-Úbeda R, García-Vázquez FA, Gil L, Matás C. Boar sperm tyrosine phosphorylation patterns in the presence of oviductal epithelial cells: in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models. *Reproduction.* 2013;146(4):315-24. http://doi.org/10.1530/REP-13-0159. PMid:23858476.

Machado SA, Kadirvel G, Daigneault BW, Korneli C, Miller P, Bovin N, Miller DJ. LewisX-containing glycans on the porcine oviductal epithelium contribute to formation of the sperm reservoir. *Biol Reprod.* 2014;91(6):140. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.114.119503. PMid:25339106.

Machado SA, Sharif M, Kadirvel G, Bovin N, Miller DJ. Adhesion to oviduct glycans regulates porcine sperm $Ca^{2+}$ influx and viability. *PLoS One.* 2020;15(8):e0237666.
http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237666. PMid:32822385.

Machado SA, Sharif M, Wang H, Bovin N, Miller DJ. Release of porcine sperm from oviduct cells is stimulated by progesterone and requires catsper. *Sci Rep.* 2019;9(1):19546.
http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55834-z. PMid:31862909.

Mahé C, Lavigne R, Com E, Pineau C, Locatelli Y, Zlotkowska AM, Almiñana C, Tsikis G, Mermillod P, Schoen J, Saint-Dizier M. Spatiotemporal profiling of the bovine oviduct fluid proteome around the time of ovulation. *Sci Rep.* 2022;12(1):4135. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07929-3.
PMid:35264682.

Mahé C, Lavigne R, Com E, Pineau C, Zlotkowska AM, Tsikis G, Mermillod P, Schoen J, Saint-Dizier M. The sperm-interacting proteome in the bovine isthmus and ampulla during the periovulatory period. *J Anim Sci Biotechnol.* 2023a;14(1):30. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00811-2. PMid:36797800.

Mahé C, Pranomphon T, Reynaud K, Laffont L, Meylheuc T, Schoen J, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Sperm-fluid-cell interplays in the bovine oviduct: glycosaminoglycans modulate sperm binding to the isthmic reservoir. *Sci Rep.* 2023b;13(1):10311. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37469-3. PMid:37365288.
Makrigiannakis A, Karamouti M, Petsas G, Makris N, Nikas G, Antsaklis A. The expression of receptivity markers in the fallopian tube epithelium. Histochem Cell Biol. 2009;132(2):159-67.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-009-0593-1. PMid:19387680.

Martin-DeLeon PA. Epididymal SPAM1 and its impact on sperm function. Mol Cell Endocrinol.
2006;250(1-2):114-21. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2005.12.033. PMid:16420970.

Martínez-León E, Osycka-Salut C, Signorelli J, Pozo P, Pérez B, Kong M, Morales P, Pérez-Martínez S, Díaz ES. Fibronectin stimulates human sperm capacitation through the cyclic AMP/protein kinase A pathway. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(9):2138-51. http://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev154. PMid:26109618.

Melo-Sterza FA, Poehland R. Lipid metabolism in bovine oocytes and early embryos under *In Vivo*, *In Vitro*, and stress conditions. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(7):22. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073421.
PMid:33810351.

Milazzotto MP, Lima CB, Fonseca AM, Santos EC, Ispada J. Erasing gametes to write blastocysts: metabolism as the new player in epigenetic reprogramming. Anim Reprod. 2020;17(3):e20200015.
http://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-ar2020-0015. PMid:33029209.

Miles JR, Blomberg LA, Krisher RL, Everts RE, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP, Zuelke KA. Comparative transcriptome analysis of in vivo- and in vitro-produced porcine blastocysts by small amplified RNA-serial analysis of gene expression (SAR-SAGE). Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75(6):976-88.
http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20844. PMid:18357560.

Miller DJ. Review: the epic journey of sperm through the female reproductive tract. Animal.
2018;12(s1):s110-20. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000526. PMid:29551099.

Mondéjar I, Martínez-Martínez I, Avilés M, Coy P. Identification of potential oviductal factors responsible for zona pellucida hardening and monospermy during fertilization in mammals. Biol Reprod.
2013;89(3):67. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.113.111385. PMid:23863406.

Mugnier S, Kervella M, Douet C, Canepa S, Pascal G, Deleuze S, Duchamp G, Monget P, Goudet G. The secretions of oviduct epithelial cells increase the equine in vitro fertilization rate: are osteopontin, atrial natriuretic peptide A and oviductin involved? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7(1):129.
http://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-7-129. PMid:19925651.

Muro Y, Hasuwa H, Isotani A, Miyata H, Yamagata K, Ikawa M, Yanagimachi R, Okabe M. Behavior of mouse spermatozoa in the female reproductive tract from soon after mating to the beginning of fertilization. Biol Reprod. 2016;94(4):80. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.115.135368.
PMid:26962112.

Nag P, Kumaresan A, Akshaya S, Manimaran A, Rajendran D, Paul N, Sharma A, Karuthadurai T, Kaustubh S, Jeyakumar S, Ramesha K. Sperm phenotypic characteristics and oviduct binding ability are altered in breeding bulls with high sperm DNA fragmentation index. Theriogenology.
2021;172:80-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.06.006. PMid:34146972.

Osycka-Salut CE, Castellano L, Fornes D, Beltrame JS, Alonso CAI, Jawerbaum A, Franchi A, Díaz ES, Perez Martinez S. Fibronectin from oviductal cells fluctuates during the estrous cycle and contributes to sperm-oviduct interaction in cattle. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118(11):4095-108.
http://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.26067. PMid:28419524.

Osycka-Salut CE, Martínez-León E, Gervasi MG, Castellano L, Davio C, Chiarante N, Franchi AM, Ribeiro ML, Díaz ES, Perez-Martinez S. Fibronectin induces capacitation-associated events through the endocannabinoid system in bull sperm. Theriogenology. 2020;153:91-101.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.04.031. PMid:32447096.

Pacheco-Trigon S, Hennequet-Antier C, Oudin JF, Piumi F, Renard JP, Duranthon V. Molecular characterization of genomic activities at the onset of zygotic transcription in mammals. Biol Reprod.
2002;67(6):1907-18. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod67.6.1907. PMid:12444069.

Petrunkina AM, Simon K, Günzel-Apel AR, Töpfer-Petersen E. Kinetics of protein tyrosine phosphorylation in sperm selected by binding to homologous and heterologous oviductal explants: how specific is the regulation by the oviduct? Theriogenology. 2004;61(9):1617-34.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.09.011. PMid:15019459.

Pranomphon T, López-Valiñas Á, Almiñana C, Mahé C, Brair VL, Parnpai R, Mermillod P, Bauersachs S, Saint-Dizier M. Oviduct epithelial spheroids during in vitro culture of bovine embryos mitigate oxidative stress, improve blastocyst quality and change the embryonic transcriptome. Biol Res.
2024a;57(1):73. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-024-00555-5. PMid:39438935.
Pranomphon T, López-Valiñas Á, Almiñana C, Mahé C, Brair VL, Parnpai R, Mermillod P, Bauersachs S, Saint-Dizier M. Oviduct epithelial spheroids during in vitro culture of bovine embryos mitigate oxidative stress, improve blastocyst quality and change the embryonic transcriptome. *Biol Res*. 2024b;57(1):73. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-024-00555-5. PMid:39438935.

Pranomphon T, Mahé C, Demattei MV, Papillier P, Vitorino Carvalho A, Reynaud K, Almiñana C, Bauersachs S, Parnpai R, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Characterization of oviduct epithelial spheroids for the study of embryo-maternal communication in cattle. *Theriogenology*. 2024c;217:113-26. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.01.022. PMid:38271765.

Puga Molina LC, Luque GM, Balestrini PA, Marín-Briggiler CI, Romarowski A, Buffone MG. Molecular basis of human sperm capacitation. *Front Cell Dev Biol*. 2018;6:72. http://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2018.00072. PMid:30105226.

Rickard JP, Pool KR, Druart X, de Graaf SP. The fate of spermatozoa in the female reproductive tract: a comparative review. *Theriogenology*. 2019;137:104-12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.05.044. PMid:31230704.

Rizos D, Clemente M, Bermejo-Alvarez P, de La Fuente J, Lonergan P, Gutiérrez-Adán A. Consequences of in vitro culture conditions on embryo development and quality. *Reprod Domest Anim*. 2008;43(Suppl. 4):44-50. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01230.x. PMid:18803756.

Rizos D, Fair T, Papadopoulos S, Boland MP, Lonergan P. Developmental, qualitative, and ultrastructural differences between ovine and bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro. *Mol Reprod Dev*. 2002a;62(3):320-7. http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10138. PMid:12112595.

Rizos D, Ward F, Duffy P, Boland MP, Lonergan P. Consequences of bovine oocyte maturation, fertilization or early embryo development in vitro versus in vivo: implications for blastocyst yield and blastocyst quality. *Mol Reprod Dev*. 2002b;61(2):234-48. http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1153. PMid:11803560.

Robertson SA. Seminal fluid signaling in the female reproductive tract: lessons from rodents and pigs. *J Anim Sci*. 2007;85(Suppl. 13):E36-44. http://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-578. PMid:17085725.

Rodríguez-Alonso B, Hamdi M, Sánchez JM, Maillo V, Gutierrez-Adan A, Lonergan P, Rizos D. An approach to study the local embryo effect on gene expression in the bovine oviduct epithelium in vivo. *Reprod Domest Anim*. 2019;54(12):1516-23. http://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13558. PMid:31472078.

Rodríguez-Alonso B, Sánchez JM, González E, Lonergan P, Rizos D. Challenges in studying preimplantation embryo-maternal interaction in cattle. *Theriogenology*. 2020;150:139-49. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.019. PMid:31973965.

Rodriguez-Martinez H, Martinez-Serrano CA, Alvarez-Rodriguez M, Martinez EA, Roca J. Reproductive physiology of the boar: what defines the potential fertility of an ejaculate? *Anim Reprod Sci*. 2024;269:107476. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107476. PMid:38664134.

Romar R, Coy P, Campos I, Gadea J, Matás C, Ruiz S. Effect of co-culture of porcine sperm and oocytes with porcine oviductal epithelial cells on in vitro fertilization. *Anim Reprod Sci*. 2001;68(1-2):85-98. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(01)00133-6. PMid:11600277.

Romero-Aguirregomezcorta J, Cronin S, Donnellan E, Fair S. Progesterone induces the release of bull spermatozoa from oviductal epithelial cells. *Reprod Fertil Dev*. 2019;31(9):1463-72. http://doi.org/10.1071/RD18316. PMid:31030724.

Saint-Dizier M, Schoen J, Chen S, Banliat C, Mermillod P. Composing the early embryonic microenvironment: physiology and regulation of oviductal secretions. *Int J Mol Sci*. 2019;21(1):21. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21010223. PMid:31905654.

Salilew-Wondim D, Saeed-Zidane M, Hoelker M, Gebremedhn S, Poirier M, Pandey HO, Tholen E, Neuhoff C, Held E, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Rings F, Fournier E, Gagné D, Sirard MA, Robert C, Gad A, Schellander K, Tesfaye D. Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of bovine blastocysts derived from in vivo embryos subjected to in vitro culture before, during or after embryonic genome activation. *BMC Genomics*. 2018;19(1):424. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4826-3. PMid:29859035.

Saraf KK, Singh RK, Kumaresan A, Nayak S, Chhillar S, Lathika S, Datta TK, Mohanty TK. Sperm functional attributes and oviduct explant binding capacity differs between bulls with different fertility ratings in the water buffalo (*Bubalus bubalis*). *Reprod Fertil Dev*. 2019;31(2):395-403. http://doi.org/10.1071/RD17452. PMid:30135005.

Saumande J, Humblot P. The variability in the interval between estrus and ovulation in cattle and its determinants. *Anim Reprod Sci*. 2005;85(3-4):171-82. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.09.009. PMid:15581501.
Schmaltz L, Barakat E, Fleurot R, Uzbekov R, Reynaud K, Laffont L, Tsikis G, Mérour I, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Phosphatidylserine on sperm head interact with Annexin A5 on oviduct luminal cilia to form a sperm reservoir in pigs. Eur J Cell Biol. 2024a;104(1):151471.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2024.151471. PMid:39700614.

Schmaltz L, Prudhomme T, Tsikis G, Reynaud K, Mérour I, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Sperm binding to oviduct epithelial spheroids varies among males and ejaculates but not among females in pigs. Theriogenology. 2024b;219:116-25. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.02.022.
PMid:38428333.

Schmaltz-Panneau B, Locatelli Y, Uzbekova S, Perreau C, Mermillod P. Bovine oviduct epithelial cells dedifferentiate partly in culture, while maintaining their ability to improve early embryo development rate and quality. Reprod Domest Anim. 2015;50(5):719-29. http://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12556.
PMid:26302033.

Senn LK, Peterson KD, Edwards JL, Payton RR, Mathew DJ. Oviduct and endometrial epithelium improve in vitro produced bovine embryo developmental kinetics. Reproduction. 2024;167(5):e240008.
http://doi.org/10.1530/REP-24-0008. PMid:38451876.

Sidrat T, Khan AA, Joo MD, Wei Y, Lee KL, Xu L, Kong IK. Bovine oviduct epithelial cell-derived culture media and exosomes improve mitochondrial health by restoring metabolic flux during pre-implantation development. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7589. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207589.
PMid:33066562.

Smith SL, Everts RE, Sung LY, Du F, Page RL, Henderson B, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Nedambale TL, Renard JP, Lewin HA, Yang X, Tian XC. Gene expression profiling of single bovine embryos uncovers significant effects of in vitro maturation, fertilization and culture. Mol Reprod Dev. 2009;76(1):38-47.
http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20927. PMid:18449896.

Soede NM, Kemp B. Expression of oestrus and timing of ovulation in pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl.
1997;52:91-103. PMid:9602722.

Sostaric E, Dieleman SJ, van de Lest CH, Colenbrander B, Vos PL, Garcia-Gil N, Gadella BM. Sperm binding properties and secretory activity of the bovine oviduct immediately before and after ovulation. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75(1):60-74. http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20766. PMid:17546595.

Soto-Heras S, Volz LJ, Bovin N, Miller DJ. Porcine sperm bind to an oviduct glycan coupled to glass surfaces as a model of sperm interaction with the oviduct. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):4680.
http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88986-2. PMid:39920342.

Suarez S, Redfern K, Raynor P, Martin F, Phillips DM. Attachment of boar sperm to mucosal explants of oviduct in vitro: possible role in formation of a sperm reservoir. Biol Reprod. 1991;44(6):998-1004.
http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod44.6.998. PMid:1873399.

Talevi R, Gualtieri R. Sulfated glycoconjugates are powerful modulators of bovine sperm adhesion and release from the oviductal epithelium in vitro. Biol Reprod. 2001;64(2):491-8.
http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod64.2.491. PMid:11159351.

Teijeiro JM, Ignotz GG, Marini PE. Annexin A2 is involved in pig (Sus scrofa) sperm-oviduct interaction. Mol Reprod Dev. 2009;76(4):334-41. http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20958. PMid:18932200.

Téteau O, Liere P, Pianos A, Desmarchais A, Lasserre O, Papillier P, Vignault C, Lebachelier de la Riviere ME, Maillard V, Binet A, Uzbekova S, Saint-Dizier M, Elis S. Bisphenol S alters the steroidome in the preovulatory follicle, oviduct fluid and plasma in ewes with contrasted metabolic status. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:892213. http://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.892213. PMid:35685208.

Toledo-Guardiola SM, Martínez-Díaz P, Martínez-Núñez R, Navarro-Serna S, Soriano-Úbeda C, Romero-Aguirregomezcorta J, Matás C. Sperm functionality is differentially regulated by porcine oviductal extracellular vesicles from the distinct phases of the estrous cycle. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2024;36(8):36.
http://doi.org/10.1071/RD23239. PMid:38713808.

Tománek M, Kopecný V, Kanka J. Genome reactivaton in developing early pig embryos: an ultrastructural and autoradiographic analysis. Anat Embryol. 1989;180(3):309-16.
http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315889. PMid:2480727.

Tomás C, Blanch E, Fazeli A, Mocé E. Effect of a pre-freezing treatment with cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrins on boar sperm longevity, capacitation dynamics, ability to adhere to porcine oviductal epithelial cells in vitro and DNA fragmentation dynamics. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2013;25(6):935-46.
http://doi.org/10.1071/RD12079. PMid:23036662.

Vega-Hidalgo J, Rodriguez M, Dipaz-Berrocal D, Rivas J, Huayhua C, Mellisho E. Sperm selection techniques in cattle: microfilter device versus conventional methods. Andrologia.
2022;54(11):e14585. http://doi.org/10.1111/and.14585. PMid:36098672.
Waberski D, Magnus F, Ardón F, Petrunkina AM, Weitze KF, Töpfer-Petersen E. Binding of boar spermatozoa to oviductal epithelium in vitro in relation to sperm morphology and storage time. Reproduction. 2006;131(2):311-8. http://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00814. PMid:16452724.

Wang S, Larina IV. In vivo three-dimensional tracking of sperm behaviors in the mouse oviduct. Development. 2018;145(6):145. http://doi.org/10.1242/dev.157685. PMid:29487107.

Wang S, Larina IV. In vivo dynamic 3D imaging of oocytes and embryos in the mouse oviduct. Cell Rep. 2021;36(2):109382. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109382. PMid:34260920.

Wang Z, Wei H, Wu Z, Zhang X, Sun Y, Gao L, Zhang W, Su YQ, Zhang M. The oocyte cumulus complex regulates mouse sperm migration in the oviduct. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):1327. http://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-04287-8. PMid:36463362.

Wilmut I, Hunter RH. Sperm transport into the oviducts of heifers mated early in estrus. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1984;24(4):461-8. http://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19840411. PMid:6541363.

Winters RA, Hamilton DN, Bhatnagar AS, Fitzgerald R, Bovin N, Miller DJ. Porcine sperm binding to oviduct cells and glycans as supplements to traditional laboratory semen analysis. J Anim Sci. 2018;96(12):5265-75. http://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky372. PMid:30252064.

Wu Z, Li B, Yu K, Zheng N, Yuan F, Miao J, Zhang M, Wang Z. The mature COC promotes the ampullary NPPC required for sperm release from porcine oviduct cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(4):24. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043118. PMid:36834527.

Xiong W, Wang Z, Shen C. An update of the regulatory factors of sperm migration from the uterus into the oviduct by genetically manipulated mice. Mol Reprod Dev. 2019;86(8):935-55. http://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23180. PMid:31131960.

Yániz JL, Lopez-Gatius F, Santolaria P, Mullins KJ. Study of the functional anatomy of bovine oviductal mucosa. Anat Rec. 2000;260(3):268-78. http://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0185(20001101)260:3<268::AID-AR60>3.0.CO;2-L. PMid:11066037.

Yuan S, Wang Z, Peng H, Ward SM, Hennig GW, Zheng H, Yan W. Oviductal motile cilia are essential for oocyte pickup but dispensable for sperm and embryo transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(22):1118. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102940118. PMid:34039711.

Zhang H, Martin-DeLeon PA. Mouse Spam1 (PH-20) is a multifunctional protein: evidence for its expression in the female reproductive tract. Biol Reprod. 2003;69(2):446-54. http://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.013854. PMid:12672666.

Zumoffen CM, Gil R, Caille AM, Morente C, Munuce MJ, Ghersevich SA. A protein isolated from human oviductal tissue in vitro secretion, identified as human lactoferrin, interacts with spermatozoa and oocytes and modulates gamete interaction. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(5):1297-308. http://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det016. PMid:23427237.

Author contributions

MSD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing; JMGSF: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing; KR: Data curation, Writing – review & editing; PM: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing; CA: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing; SB: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing; CM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.