<table>
<tr>
<th valign="top">
							Issue
					</th>
<td width="10"></td>
<td>
<div>
											E3S Web Conf.
									</div>
<div><strong>Volume </strong>665, 2025				</div>
				
					                6<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2025)
	            					</td>
<tr><td colspan="3"></td></tr>
<tr><td class="sep_issue" colspan="3"></td></tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>
					Article Number
					</th>
<td></td>
<td>01043</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>
					Number of page(s)
					</th>
<td></td>
<td>11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Section</th>
<td></td>
<td>Agricultural Economic and Business</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>DOI</th>
<td></td>
<td>
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566501043">
					https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566501043
				</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Published online</th>
<td></td>
<td>
				19 November 2025
			</td>
</tr>
</table>

## Performance Assessment of Tea Plantation-Based Tourism Village Management: A Case Study of Nglinggo Tourism Village, Kulon Progo, Yogyakarta

Sutrisno1*, Alfitrah Azhar1, Sintia Aceng Paramita1, Sri Handari Wahyuningsih2, Wahyu Imam Satoso3, Wahyu Wardana4 and Takahiro Fujiwara5

1 Department of Agribusiness Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Jalan Brawijaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia 2 Department of Management Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Jalan Brawijaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia 3 Department of Agribusiness Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Jalan Kedungmundu Tembalang Semarang, Indonesia 4 Department of Forestry Management Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jalan Agro Bulaksumur Yogyakarta, Indonesia 5 Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 744 Motokanishi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan

* Corresponding Author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the tourism management of Nglinggo Tourism Village by assessing stakeholder perceptions based on the 4A components: Attraction, Accessibility, Amenities, and Ancillary services. A mixed-method approach was used, combining quantitative surveys with 98 respondents (37 internal and 61 external stakeholders) and qualitative observations. The findings indicate that attractions and ancillary services received relatively high ratings from both internal and external respondents. However, significant differences in perception were found in accessibility and amenities. Internal stakeholders generally rated all aspects more positively than external respondents, a pattern confirmed through independent t-tests showing statistically significant differences. These gaps highlight the importance of incorporating tourist feedback into future planning. The study concludes that although the tourism village has strengths in attractions and community-based support, strategic improvements in access and facilities are necessary to enhance visitor satisfaction and destination competitiveness.

© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.