# Meson Particle Listings

## $D_{s1}(2460)^{\pm}$, $D_{s1}(2536)^{\pm}$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.274 ± 0.045 ± 0.020</td><td>251</td><td><sup>13</sup>AUBERT, B</td><td>04S</td><td>BABR</td><td>B → $D_{s1}(2460) + D^{(*)}$</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 0.49</td><td>90</td><td>BESSON</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6"><sup>13</sup>Used by AUBERT 06N in their measurement of B(D<sub>s</sub><sup>*</sup> π<sup>0</sup>) and B(D<sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup> γ).</td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma(D_s^* \pi^0) \quad \Gamma_3 / \Gamma_1 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.090 ± 0.020</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.14 ± 0.04 ± 0.02</td><td></td><td></td><td>60</td><td>MIKAMI</td><td>04 BELL</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.08</td><td>90</td><td>BESSON</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^* \gamma) / \Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^0) \quad \Gamma_4 / \Gamma_1 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.16</td><td>90</td><td>BESSON</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.31</td><td>90</td><td>MIKAMI</td><td>04</td><td>BELL</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \gamma) / \Gamma(D_s^* \pi^0) \quad \Gamma_5 / \Gamma_1 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.22</td><td>95</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04E</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.58</td><td>90</td><td>BESSON</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^* \pi^0) / [\Gamma(D_s^* \pi^0) + \Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+) \gamma] \quad \Gamma_1 / (\Gamma_1 + \Gamma_5) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.93 ± 0.09</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.97 ± 0.09 ± 0.05</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ \gamma) / [\Gamma(D_s^* \pi^0) + \Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \gamma)] \quad \Gamma_2 / (\Gamma_1 + \Gamma_5) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.35 ± 0.04</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.337 ± 0.036 ± 0.036</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) / [\Gamma(D_s^* \pi^0) + \Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \gamma)] \quad \Gamma_3 / (\Gamma_1 + \Gamma_5) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.083 ± 0.017</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.077 ± 0.013 ± 0.008</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^* \gamma) / [\Gamma(D_s^* \pi^0) + \Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \gamma)] \quad \Gamma_4 / (\Gamma_1 + \Gamma_5) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.24</td><td>95</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \gamma) / [\Gamma(D_s^* \pi^0) + \Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \gamma)] \quad \Gamma_5 / (\Gamma_1 + \Gamma_5) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.25</td><td>95</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^0) / [\Gamma(D_s^* \pi^0) + \Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \gamma)] \quad \Gamma_6 / (\Gamma_1 + \Gamma_5) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.042</td><td>95</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ \pi^0 \pi^0) / [\Gamma(D_s^* \pi^0) + \Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \gamma)] \quad \Gamma_7 / (\Gamma_1 + \Gamma_5) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.68</td><td>95</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ \gamma \gamma) / [\Gamma(D_s^* \pi^0) + \Gamma(D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ \gamma)] \quad \Gamma_8 / (\Gamma_1 + \Gamma_5) $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.33</td><td>95</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

## $D_{s1}(2460)^{\pm}$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>06N</td><td>PR D74 031103</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>PR D74 032007</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>04E</td><td>PR D69 031101</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>04S</td><td>PRL 93 181801</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>MIKAMI</td><td>04</td><td>PRL 92 012002</td><td>Y. Mikami et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BESSON</td><td>03</td><td>PR D68 032002</td><td>D. Besson et al.</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>KROKOVNY</td><td>03B</td><td>PRL 91 262002</td><td>P. Krokovny et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$ D_{s1}(2536)^{\pm} $$

$$ I(J^P) = 0(1^+) $$

J, P need confirmation.

Seen in $D^*(2010)^+ K^0$, $D^*(2007)^0 K^+$, and $D_s^+ \pi^+ \pi^-$. Not seen in $D^+ K^0$ or $D^0 K^+$. $J^P = 1^+$ assignment strongly favored.

$$ D_{s1}(2536)^{\pm} \text{MASS} $$

The fit includes $D^{\pm}$, $D^0$, $D_s^{\pm}$, $D^{*\pm}$, $D^{*0}$, $D_s^{*\pm}$, $D_{1}(2420)^{0}$, $D_{2}^{*}(2460)^{0}$, and $D_{s1}(2536)^{\pm}$ mass and mass difference measurements.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2535.11 ± 0.06</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2535.21 ± 0.28</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2537.7 ± 0.5 ± 3.1</td><td>24</td><td>1 ABLIKIM</td><td>19P</td><td>BES3</td><td>4.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D_s^+ \bar{D}_s^0 K^-$</td></tr><tr><td>2535.7 ± 0.6 ± 0.5</td><td>46</td><td>2 ABAZOV</td><td>09G</td><td>D0</td><td>$B_s^0$ → $D_{s1}^+ \mu^+ \nu_\mu X$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tr><td>2534.78 ± 0.31 ± 0.40</td><td>182</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08B</td><td>BABR</td><td>B → $D^{(*)}$ $D^* K$</td></tr><tr><td>2534.6 ± 0.3 ± 0.7</td><td>193</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D_s^+ \pi^+ \pi^- X$</td></tr><tr><td>2535.3 ± 0.7</td><td>92</td><td>3 HEISTER</td><td>02B</td><td>ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^+ K^0 X$, $D^0 K^+ X$</td></tr><tr><td>2534.2 ± 1.2</td><td>9</td><td>ASRATYAN</td><td>94</td><td>BECB</td><td>$\nu N \rightarrow D^+ K^0 X$, $D^* 0 K^\pm X$</td></tr><tr><td>2535 ± 0.6 ± 1</td><td>75</td><td>FRABETTI</td><td>94B</td><td>E687</td><td>γ Be → $D^+ K^0 X$, $D^0 K^+ X$</td></tr><tr><td>2535.2 ± 0.5 ± 1.5</td><td>28</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>92R</td><td>ARG</td><td>10.4 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^0 K^+ X$</td></tr><tr><td>2536.6 ± 0.7 ± 0.4</td><td></td><td>AVERY</td><td>90</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^+ K^0 X$</td></tr><tr><td>2535.9 ± 0.6 ± 2.0</td><td></td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89E</td><td>ARG</td><td>$D_{s1}^* \rightarrow D^*(2010) K^0$</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2534.1 ± 0.6</td><td>116</td><td>4 AUSHEV</td><td>11</td><td>BELL</td><td>B → $D_{s1}(2536) + D^{(*)}$</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2535.08 ± 0.01 ± 0.15</td><td>8038</td><td>5 LEES</td><td>11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^+ K^0 S^0 X$</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2535.57<sup>+0.44</sup><sub>-0.41</sub> ± 0.10</td><td>236</td><td>6 CHEKANOV</td><td>09</td><td>ZEUS</td><td>e<sup>±</sup> p → $D^+ K^0 S^0 X$, $D^0 K^+ X$</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2535.3 ± 0.2 ± 0.5</td><td>134</td><td>7 ALEXANDER</td><td>93</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^0 K^+ X$</td></tr><tr><td>2534.8 ± 0.6 ± 0.6</td><td>44</td><td>8 ALEXANDER</td><td>93</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^+ K^0 X$</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2535 ± 28</td><td></td><td>9 ASRATYAN</td><td>88</td><td>HLBC</td><td>$\nu N \rightarrow D_s \gamma \gamma X$</td></tr></table>

1 From a fit of the $D_s^+$ recoil mass distribution with an incoherent sum of the S-wave and D-wave Breit-Wigner line shapes.

2 Using the $D^*(2010)^{\pm}$ mass of 2010.0 ± 0.4 MeV from PDG 06.

3 Calculated using $m(D^*(2010)^{\pm}) = 2010.0 \pm 0.5$ MeV, $m(D^*(2007)^0) = 2006.7 \pm 0.5$ MeV, and the mass difference below.

4 Systematic uncertainties not evaluated.

5 Calculated using the mass difference $m(D_{s1}^+) - m(D^{*+})_{PDG}$ below and $m(D^{*+})_{PDG} = 2010.25 \pm 0.14$ MeV. Assuming S-wave decay of the $D_{s1}(2536)$ to $D^{*+} K_S^0$, using a Breit-Wigner line shape corresponding to L=0.

6 Calculated using the mass difference $m(D_{s1}^+) - m(D^{*+})_{PDG}$ reported below and $m(D^{*+})_{PDG} = 2010.27 \pm 0.17$ MeV.

7 Calculated using $m(D^*(2007)^0) = 2006.6 \pm 0.5$ MeV and the mass difference below.

8 Calculated using $m(D^*(2010)^{\pm}) = 2010.1 \pm 0.6$ MeV and the mass difference below.

9 Not seen in $D^* K^0$.

$$ m_{D_{s1}(2536)^{\pm}} - m_{D_s^*(2111)^{\pm}} $$

The fit includes $D^{\pm}$, $D^0$, $D_s^{\pm}$, $D^{*\pm}$, $D^{*0}$, $D_s^{*\pm}$, $D_{1}(2420)^{0}$, $D_{2}^{*}(2460)^{0}$, and $D_{s1}(2536)^{\pm}$ mass and mass difference measurements.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>422.9 ± 0.4</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>424 ± 28</td><td></td><td>ASRATYAN</td><td>88 HLBC</td><td>$D_s^{*\pm} \gamma$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ m_{D_{s1}(2536)^{\pm}} - m_{D^*(2010)^{\pm}} $$

The fit includes $D^{\pm}$, $D^0$, $D_s^{\pm}$, $D^{*\pm}$, $D^{*0}$, $D_s^{*\pm}$, $D_{1}(2420)^{0}$, $D_{2}^{*}(2460)^{0}$, and $D_{s1}(2536)^{\pm}$ mass and mass difference measurements.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>524.85 ± 0.04</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>524.84 ± 0.04</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>524.83 ± 0.01 ± 0.04</td><td>10 LEES</td><td>11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^+ K_S^0 X$</td></tr><tr><td>525.30<sup>+0.44</sup><sub>-0.41</sub> ± 0.10</td><td>236 ± 30</td><td>CHEKANOV</td><td>09 ZEUS</td><td>e<sup>±</sup> p → $D^+ K^0 X$, $D^0 K^+ X$</td></tr><tr><td>525.3 ± 0.6 ± 0.1</td><td>41</td><td>HEISTER</td><td>02B</td><td>ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^+ K^0 X$</td></tr><tr><td>524.7 ± 0.6 ± 0.2</td><td>44</td><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>93 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^+ K^0 X$</td></tr></tbody></table>

10 Assuming S-wave decay of the $D_{s1}(2536)$ to $D^{*+} K_S^0$, using a Breit-Wigner line shape corresponding to L=0.

$$ m_{D_{s1}(2536)^{\pm}} - m_{D^*(2007)^0} $$

The fit includes $D^{\pm}$, $D^0$, $D_s^{\pm}$, $D^{*\pm}$, $D^{*0}$, $D_s^{*\pm}$, $D_{1}(2420)^{0}$, $D_{2}^{*}(2460)^{0}$, and $D_{s1}(2536)^{\pm}$ mass and mass difference measurements.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>528.26 ± 0.05</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>528.68 ± 0.28</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>528.7 ± 1.9 ± 0.5</td><td>51</td><td>HEISTER</td><td>02B</td><td>ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^0 K^+ X$</td></tr><tr><td>527.3 ± 2.2</td><td>29</td><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97W</td><td>OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^0 K^+ X$</td></tr><tr><td>528.7 ± 0.2 ± 0.2</td><td>134</td><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>93 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^0 K^+ X$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ D_{s1}(2536)^{\pm} \text{WIDTH} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.92 ± 0.05</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.7 ± 1.2 ± 0.6</td><td>24</td><td>11 ABLIKIM</td><td>19P</td><td>BES3</td><td>4.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D_s^+ \bar{D}_s^0 K^-$</td></tr><tr><td>0.92 ± 0.03 ± 0.04</td><td>8038</td><td>12 LEES</td><td>11B</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → $D^+ K^0 S^0 X$</td></tr></tbody></table>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.75 ± 0.23</td><td>116</td><td><sup>13</sup>AUSHEV</td><td>11</td><td>BELL</td><td>B → D<sub>51</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup> + D<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.5</td><td>95</td><td>193</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> →<br/>D<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 3.2</td><td>90</td><td>75</td><td>FRABETTI</td><td>94B</td><td>E687</td><td>γ Be → D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup> X,<br/>D<sup>+</sup>0 K<sup>+</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.3</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>93</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup>0 K<sup>+</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 3.9</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>92R</td><td>ARG</td><td>10.4 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup>0 K<sup>+</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5.44</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>AVERY</td><td>90</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 4.6</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89E</td><td>ARG</td><td>D<sup>*</sup><sub>51</sub> → D<sup>*</sup>(2010) K<sup>0</sup></td></tr></table>

¹¹From a fit of the $D^+$ recoil mass distribution with an incoherent sum of the S-wave and S-wave Breit-Wigner line shapes.

¹²Assuming S-wave decay of the $D_{51}(2536)$ to $D^+K^0$, using a Breit-Wigner line shape corresponding to L=0.

¹³Systematic uncertainties not evaluated.

### $D_{51}(2536)^{+}$ DECAY MODES

Branching fractions are given relative to the one **DEFINED AS 1**. $D_{51}(2536)^{-}$ modes are charge conjugates of the modes below.

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>f</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Confidence level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td><td>0.85 ± 0.12</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> (D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup>)<sub>S-wave</sub></td><td>0.61 ± 0.09</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub> (D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup>)<sub>D-wave</sub></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup></td><td>0.48 ± 0.07</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>5</sub> D<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>0.028 ± 0.005</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>6</sub> D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td colspan="2" style="text-align: center;">DEFINED AS 1</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>7</sub> D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt;0.34</td><td>90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>8</sub> D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt;0.12</td><td>90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>9</sub> D<sup>+</sup><sub>S</sub> γ</td><td colspan="2" style="text-align: center;">possibly seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>10</sub> D<sup>+</sup><sub>S</sub> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td colspan="2" style="text-align: center;">seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $D_{51}(2536)^{+}$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><caption>Γ(D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup>)</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>1.18 ± 0.16 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.88 ± 0.24 ± 0.08</td><td>116</td><td>AUSHEV</td><td>11</td><td>BELL</td><td>B → D<sub>51</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup> + D<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2.3 ± 0.6 ± 0.3</td><td>236 ± 30</td><td>CHEKANOV</td><td>09</td><td>ZEUS</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> p → D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup> X,<br/>D<sup>+</sup>0 K<sup>+</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>1.32 ± 0.47 ± 0.23</td><td>92</td><td><sup>14</sup>HEISTER</td><td>02B</td><td>Alep</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup> X,<br/>D<sup>+</sup>0 K<sup>+</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>1.9 <sup>+1.1</sup><sub>-0.9</sub> ± 0.4</td><td>35</td><td><sup>14</sup>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97W</td><td>OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> X,<br/>D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>1.1 ± 0.3</td><td></td><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>93</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> →<br/>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> X, D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>1.4 ± 0.3 ± 0.2</td><td></td><td><sup>15</sup>ALBRECHT</td><td>92R</td><td>ARG</td><td>10.4 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> →<br/>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> X, D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup> X</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹⁴Ratio of the production rates measured in $Z^0$ decays.

¹⁵Evaluated by us from published inclusive cross-sections.

<table><caption>Γ(K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.48 ± 0.07 ± 0.02</strong></td><td></td><td>GAO</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> at 10.52 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table><table><caption>Γ((D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup>)<sub>S-wave</sub>)/Γ(D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup>)</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.72 ± 0.05 ± 0.01</strong></td><td>5485</td><td>BALAGURA</td><td>08</td><td>BELL 10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup> X</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>Γ(D<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup>)</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>3.27 ± 0.18 ± 0.37</strong></td><td>1264</td><td>BALAGURA</td><td>08</td><td>BELL 10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> X</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>Γ(D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup>)</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;0.40</strong></td><td>90</td><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>93</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.43</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89E</td><td>ARG D<sup>*</sup><sub>51</sub> → D<sup>*</sup>(2010) K<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>Γ(D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;0.12</strong></td><td>90</td><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>93</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> X</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>Γ(D<sup>+</sup><sub>S</sub> γ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>possibly seen</td><td>ASRATYAN</td><td>88</td><td>HLBC νN → D<sub>S</sub> γγ X</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>Γ(D<sup>+</sup><sub>S</sub> γ)/Γ(D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;0.42</strong></td><td>90</td><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>93</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> X</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>Γ(D<sup>+</sup><sub>S</sub> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>BABR 10.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup><sub>S</sub> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> X</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $D_{51}(2536)^{\pm}$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>GAO</td><td>23</td><td>PR D108 112015</td><td>B.S. Gao et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19P</td><td>CP C43 031001</td><td>M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUSHEV</td><td>11</td><td>PR D83 051102</td><td>T. Aushev et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>11B</td><td>PR D83 072003</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>09G</td><td>PRL 102 051801</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHEKANOV</td><td>09</td><td>EPI C60 25</td><td>S. Chekanov et al. (ZEUS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08B</td><td>PR D77 011102</td><td>B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BALAGURA</td><td>08</td><td>PR D77 032001</td><td>V. Balagura et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>06P</td><td>PR D74 032007</td><td>B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PDG</td><td>06</td><td>JP G31 1</td><td>W.-M. Yao et al. (PDG Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HEISTER</td><td>02B</td><td>PL B526 34</td><td>A. Heister et al. (ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97W</td><td>ZPHY C76 425</td><td>K. Ackerstaff et al. (OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ASRATYAN</td><td>94</td><td>ZPHY C61 563</td><td>A.E. Asratan et al. (BIRM, BELG, CERN+)</td></tr><tr><td>FRABETTI</td><td>94B</td><td>PRL 72 324</td><td>P.L. Frabetti et al. (FNAL E687 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>93</td><td>PL B303 377</td><td>J. Alexander et al. (CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>92R</td><td>PL B297 425</td><td>H. Albrecht et al. (ARGUS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AVERY</td><td>90</td><td>PL D41 774</td><td>PL D41 774 (CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89E</td><td>PL B230 162</td><td>H. Albrecht et al. (ARGUS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ASRATYAN</td><td>88</td><td>ZPHY C40 483</td><td>A.E. Asratan et al. (ITEP, SERP)</td></tr></table>

$$D_{52}^{*}(2573) \qquad I(J^{P}) = 0(2^{+})$$

### $D_{52}^{*}(2573)$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>2569.1 ± 0.8 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">Error includes scale factor of 2.4. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>2570.7 ± 2.0 ± 1.7</td><td>62</td><td><sup>1</sup> ABLIKIM</td><td>19P BES3</td><td>4.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup><sub>S</sub> D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2568.39 ± 0.29 ± 0.26</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AW LHCB</td><td>B<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2569.4 ± 1.6 ± 0.5</td><td>82</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>11A LHCB</td><td>B<sub>S</sub> → D<sup>*</sup><sub>S2</sub>(2573) μτX</td></tr><tr><td>2572.2 ± 0.3 ± 1.0</td><td></td><td>AUBERT, BE</td><td>06E BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D K X</td></tr><tr><td>2574.5 ± 3.3 ± 1.6</td><td></td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>96 ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td>2573.2 <sup>+1.7</sup><sub>-1.6</sub> ± 0.9</td><td>217</td><td>KUBOTA</td><td>94 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> ~ 10.5 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

2570.0 ± 4.3 25 ²EVDOKIMOV 04 SELX 600 Σ<sup>-</sup> A → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> X

2568.6 ± 3.2 64 ³HEISTER 02B ALEP e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> X

¹From a fit of the $D_S^+$ recoil mass distribution.

²Not independent of the mass difference below.

³Calculated using $m_{D^0} = 1864.5 \pm 0.5$ MeV and the mass difference below.

<figure><img src="image_572.png" /><figcaption>WEIGHTED AVERAGE 2569.1 ± 0.8 (Error scaled by 2.4)</figcaption></figure>

(Confidence Level = 0.0007)

<table><caption>$D_{52}^{*}(2573)$ MASS (MeV)</caption><caption>m<sub>D<sup>+</sup><sub>S2</sub>(2573)</sub> - m<sub>D<sup>0</sup></sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>704 ± 3 ± 1</strong></td><td>64</td><td>HEISTER</td><td>02B</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>705.4 ± 4.3</td><td>25</td><td><sup>1</sup> EVDOKIMOV</td><td>04 SELX</td><td>600 Σ<sup>-</sup> A → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> X</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><sup>1</sup> Systematic errors not estimated.</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $D_{52}^{*}(2573)$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>16.9 ± 0.7 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>17.2 ± 3.6 ± 1.1</td><td>62</td><td><sup>1</sup> ABLIKIM</td><td>19P BES3</td><td>4.6 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup><sub>S</sub> D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>16.9 ± 0.5 ± 0.6</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AW LHCB</td><td>B<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>12.1 ± 4.5 ± 1.6</td><td>82</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>11A LHCB</td><td>B<sub>S</sub> → D<sup>*</sup><sub>S2</sub>(2573) μτX</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## $D_{s2}^*(2573), D_{s0}(2590)^+, D_{s1}^*(2700)^+$

$27.1 \pm 0.6 \pm 5.6$

$10.4 \pm 8.3 \pm 3.0$

$16 \pm \frac{5}{4} \pm 3$

AUBERT,BE

ALBRECHT

KUBOTA

217

25

EVDOKIMOV

04

SELX

600

06E BABR

96 ARG

94 CLE2

e⁺e⁻ → DKX

e⁺e⁻ → D⁰K⁺X

e⁺e⁻ → D⁰K⁺X

e⁺e⁻ → D⁰K⁺X

e⁺e⁻ → D⁰K⁺X

e⁺e⁻ → D⁰K⁺X

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$14 \pm \frac{9}{6}$

$25$

$2$

EVDOKIMOV

04

SELX

600

$\Sigma^- A \to D^0 K^+ X$

¹ From a fit of the $D_S^+$ recoil mass distribution.

² Systematic errors not estimated.

## $D_{s2}^*(2573)^+$ DECAY MODES

$D_{s2}^*(2573)^-$ modes are charge conjugates of the modes below.

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>i</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>not seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub> D<sup>+</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub> D<sup>*</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

## $D_{s2}^*(2573)^+$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>CHG</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub>/Γ</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>VALUE</td><td>217</td><td>KUBOTA</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> ~ 10.5 GeV</td></tr><tr><td> seen</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>CHG</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub>/Γ<sub>1</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>VALUE</td><td>90</td><td>KUBOTA</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> ~ 10.5 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.33</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>+</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>CHG</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub>/Γ<sub>1</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>VALUE</td><td>0.49 ± 0.10 ± 0.02</td><td>GAO</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> at 10.52 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.33</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>*</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>+</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>CHG</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub>/Γ<sub>3</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>VALUE</td><td>0.044 ± 0.005 ± 0.011</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16AW LHCB</td><td>pp → D<sup>*</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>X at 7, 8 TeV</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.33</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ First observation of the $D_{s2}^*(2573)^+ \to D^+K^0S^-$ decay with a significance of 6.9 σ.

## $D_{s2}^*(2573)^+$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>GAO</td><td>23</td><td>PR D108 112015</td><td>B.S. Gao et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABLIKIM</td><td>19P</td><td>CP C43 031001</td><td>M. Ablikim et al.</td><td>(BESIII Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AW</td><td>JHEP 1602 133</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AW</td><td>PRL 113 162001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.) JP</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>11A</td><td>PL B698 14</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT,BE</td><td>06E</td><td>PRL 97 222001</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>EVDOKIMOV</td><td>04</td><td>PRL 93 242001</td><td>A.V. Evdokimov et al.</td><td>(SELEX Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HEISTER</td><td>02B</td><td>PL B526 34</td><td>A. Heister et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>96</td><td>ZPHY C69 405</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td><td>(ARGUS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>KUBOTA</td><td>94</td><td>PRL 72 1972</td><td>Y. Kubota et al.</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr></table>

## $D_{s0}(2590)^+$

$I(J^P) = 0(0^-)$

## OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE

### $D_{s0}(2590)^+$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2591 ± 6 ± 7</td><td>444</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21A LHCB</td><td>B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup>(D<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The mass is calculated from the position of the T-matrix pole

### $D_{s0}(2590)^+$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>89 ± 16 ± 12</td><td>444</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21A LHCB</td><td>B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup>(D<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The width is calculated from the position of the T-matrix pole

### $D_{s0}(2590)^+$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>i</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> D<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub>/Γ</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>VALUE</td><td>444</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21A LHCB</td><td>B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup>(D<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

## $D_{s0}(2590)^+$ REFERENCES

AAIJ

21A PRL 126 122002

R. Aaij et al.

(LHCb Collab.)

## $D_{s1}^*(2700)^+$

$I(J^P) = 0(1^-)$

### $D_{s1}^*(2700)^+$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2714 ± 5</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2732.3 ± 4.3 ± 5.8</td><td>15.7k</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AW LHCB</td><td>pp → D<sup>*</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>X at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2699 ± <sup>+14</sup>/<sub>-7</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2709.2 ± 1.9 ± 4.5</td><td>52k</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15C BABR</td><td>B → D D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2710 ± 2 ± <sup>+12</sup>/<sub>-7</sub></td><td>10.4k</td><td>AAUBERT</td><td>12AU LHCB</td><td>pp → (DK)<sup>+</sup>X at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2708 ± 9 ± <sup>+11</sup>/<sub>-10</sub></td><td>182</td><td>BRODZICKA</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2694 ± 8 ± <sup>+13</sup>/<sub>-3</sub></td><td>LEES</td><td>15C BABR</td><td>B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup>D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2707 ± 8 ± 8</td><td>LEES</td><td>15C BABR</td><td>B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2688 ± 4 ± 3</td><td>4 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → DKX</td></tr></table>

¹ From a combined analysis of $B^0 \to D^-D^0K^+$ and $B^+ \to D^0D^0K^+$.

² From the combined fit of the $D^+K_S^0$ and $D^0K^+$ modes in the model including the $D_{s2}^*(2573)^+$, $D_{s1}^*(2700)^+$ and spin-0 $D_{s,j}^*(2860)^+$.

³ From simultaneous fits to the two DK mass spectra and to the total $D^+K$ mass spectrum.

⁴ Superseded by AUBERT 09AR.

<figure><img src="image_573.png" /></figure>

### $D_{s1}^*(2700)^+$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>122 ± 10</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>136 ± 19</td><td>24 ± 15.7k</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AW LHCB</td><td>pp → D<sup>*</sup>K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>X at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>127 ± <sup>+24</sup>/<sub>-19</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>115.8 ± 7.3 ± 12.1</td><td>52k</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15C BABR</td><td>B → D D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>149 ± 7 ± <sup>+39</sup>/<sub>-52</sub></td><td>10.4k</td><td>AAUBERT</td><td>12AU LHCB</td><td>pp → (DK)<sup>+</sup>X at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>108 ± 23 ± <sup>+36</sup>/<sub>-31</sub></td><td>182</td><td>BRODZICKA</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>145 ± 24 ± <sup>+22</sup>/<sub>-14</sub></td><td>LEES</td><td>15C BABR</td><td>B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup>D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>113 ± 21 ± <sup>+20</sup>/<sub>-16</sub></td><td>LEES</td><td>15C BABR</td><td>B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>112 ± 7 ± 36</td><td>4 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06E BABR</td><td>10.6 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → DKX</td></tr></table>

¹ From a combined analysis of $B^0 \to D^-D^0K^+$ and $B^+ \to D^0D^0K^+$.

² From the combined fit of the $D^+K_S^0$ and $D^0K^+$ modes in the model including the $D_{s2}^*(2573)^+$, $D_{s1}^*(2700)^+$ and spin-0 $D_{s,j}^*(2860)^+$.

³ From simultaneous fits to the two DK mass spectra and to the total $D^+K$ mass spectrum.

⁴ Superseded by AUBERT 09AR.
$D_{s1}^*(2700)^{\pm}$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> DK</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub> D<sup>+</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub> D<sup>*</sup> K</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>5</sub> D<sup>*</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>6</sub> D<sup>*</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

$D_{s1}^*(2700)^{\pm}$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>*</sup> K)/Γ(DK)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>4</sub>/Γ<sub>1</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.91±0.13±0.12</td><td>10.4k</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AR BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>(*)</sup> K X</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From the average of the corresponding ratios with $D^{(*)0}K^+$ and $D^{(*)+}K_5^0$.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>*</sup>0 K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>5</sub>/Γ<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.88±0.14±0.14</td><td>7716</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AR BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>(*)</sup> K X</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From the $D^{*0}K^+$ and $D^0K^+$, where $D^{*0} → D^0π^0$.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>*</sup>+ K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>+</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>6</sub>/Γ<sub>3</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.14±0.39±0.23</td><td>2700</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AR BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>(*)</sup> K X</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From the $D^{*+}K_5^0$ and $D^+K_5^0$, where $D^{*+} → D^+π^0$.

$D_{s1}^*(2700)^{\pm}$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AW JHEP 1602 133</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>15C PR D91 052002</td><td>J.P. Lees et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AU JHEP 1210 151</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AR PR D80 092003</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BRODZICKA</td><td>08 PRL 100 092001</td><td>J. Brodzicka et al.</td><td>(BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT,BE</td><td>06E PRL 97 222001</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$D_{s1}^*(2860)^{\pm}$$

$$I(J^P) = 0(1^{-})$$

OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE
was $D_{s,j}^*(2860)$

$J^P$ consistent with $1^{-}$ from angular analysis of AAIJ 14AW.

$D_{s1}^*(2860)^{\pm}$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2859±12±24</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AW LHCB</td><td>B<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Separated from the spin-3 component $D_{s3}^*(2860)^{-}$ by a fit of the helicity angle of the $D^0K^-$ system, with a statistical significance of the spin-3 and spin-1 components in excess of 10 $\sigma$.

$D_{s1}^*(2860)^{\pm}$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>159±23±77</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AW LHCB</td><td>B<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Separated from the spin-3 component $D_{s3}^*(2860)^{-}$ by a fit of the helicity angle of the $D^0K^-$ system, with a statistical significance of the spin-3 and spin-1 components in excess of 10 $\sigma$.

$D_{s1}^*(2860)^{\pm}$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AW PRL 113 162001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.) JP</td></tr></table>

$$D_{s3}^*(2860)^{\pm}$$

$$I(J^P) = 0(3^{-})$$

$J^P$ consistent with $3^{-}$ from angular analysis of AAIJ 14AW. Observed by AUBERT,BE 06E and AUBERT 09AR in inclusive production of DK and $D^+K$ in $e^+e^-$ annihilation.

$D_{s3}^*(2860)^{\pm}$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2860.5±2.6±6.5</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AW LHCB</td><td>B<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>2867.1±4.3±1.9</td><td>3.1k</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AW LHCB</td><td>pp → D<sup>+</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> X at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2866.1±1.0±6.3</td><td>36k</td><td>2,3 AAIJ</td><td>12AU LHCB</td><td>pp → (DK)<sup>+</sup> X at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2862 ± 2<sup>+5</sup><sub>-2</sub></td><td>3122</td><td>2,4 AUBERT</td><td>09AR BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>(*)</sup> K X</td></tr><tr><td>2856.6±1.5±5.0</td><td></td><td>5 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06E BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup> K X</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Separated from the spin-1 component $D_{s1}^*(2860)^{-}$ by a fit of the helicity angle of the $D^0K^-$ system, with a statistical significance of the spin-3 and spin-1 components in excess of 10 $\sigma$.

² Possible contribution from the $D_{s1}^*(2860)$ state.

³ From the combined fit of the $D^+K_5^0$ and $D^0K^+$ modes in the model including the $D_{s2}^*(2573)^+$, $D_{s1}^*(2700)^+$ and spin-0 $D_{s,j}^*(2860)^+$.

⁴ From simultaneous fits to the two DK mass spectra and to the total $D^+K$ mass spectrum.

⁵ Superseded by AUBERT 09AR.

$D_{s3}^*(2860)^{\pm}$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>53 ± 7 ± 7</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AW LHCB</td><td>B<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>50 ±11 ±13</td><td>3.1k</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AW LHCB</td><td>pp → D<sup>+</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> X at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>69.9±3.2±6.6</td><td>36k</td><td>2,3 AAIJ</td><td>12AU LHCB</td><td>pp → (DK)<sup>+</sup> X at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>48 ± 3 ± 6</td><td>3122</td><td>2,4 AUBERT</td><td>09AR BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>(*)</sup> K X</td></tr><tr><td>47 ± 7 ±10</td><td></td><td>5 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06E BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>+</sup> K X</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Separated from the spin-1 component $D_{s1}^*(2860)^{-}$ by a fit of the helicity angle of the $D^0K^-$ system, with a statistical significance of the spin-3 and spin-1 components in excess of 10 $\sigma$.

² Possible contribution from the $D_{s1}^*(2860)$ state.

³ From the combined fit of the $D^+K_5^0$ and $D^0K^+$ modes in the model including the $D_{s2}^*(2573)^+$, $D_{s1}^*(2700)^+$ and spin-0 $D_{s,j}^*(2860)^+$.

⁴ From simultaneous fits to the two DK mass spectra and to the total $D^+K$ mass spectrum.

⁵ Superseded by AUBERT 09AR.

$D_{s3}^*(2860)^{\pm}$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> DK</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub> D<sup>+</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub> D<sup>*</sup> K</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>5</sub> D<sup>*</sup>0 K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>6</sub> D<sup>*</sup>+ K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

$D_{s3}^*(2860)^{\pm}$ BRANCHING RATIOS

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>*</sup> K)/Γ(DK)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>4</sub>/Γ<sub>1</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.10±0.15±0.19</td><td>3122</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AR BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>(*)</sup> K X</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From the average of the corresponding ratios with $D^{(*)0}K^+$ and $D^{(*)+}K_5^0$.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>*</sup>0 K<sup>+</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>5</sub>/Γ<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.04±0.17±0.20</td><td>2241</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AR BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>(*)</sup> K X</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From the $D^{*0}K^+$ and $D^0K^+$, where $D^{*0} → D^0π^0$.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(D<sup>*</sup>+ K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)/Γ(D<sup>+</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th>Γ<sub>6</sub>/Γ<sub>3</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.38±0.35±0.49</td><td>881</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AR BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>(*)</sup> K X</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ From the $D^{*+}K_5^0$ and $D^+K_5^0$, where $D^{*+} → D^+π^0$.

$D_{s3}^*(2860)^{\pm}$ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AW JHEP 1602 133</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AW PRL 113 162001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.) JP</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AU JHEP 1210 151</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AR PR D80 092003</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT,BE</td><td>06E PRL 97 222001</td><td>B. Aubert et al.</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr></table>
$D_{s,J}(3040)^{\pm}$

$$D_{s,J}(3040)^{\pm}$$

$$I(J^P) = 0(?)$$

OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE

Observed by AUBERT 09AR in inclusive production of $D^*K$ in $e^+e^-$ annihilation.

$D_{s,J}(3040)^{+}$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3044 ± 8 <sup>+30</sup><sub>-5</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AR BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>*</sup> K X</td></tr></tbody></table>

$D_{s,J}(3040)^{+}$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>239 ± 35 <sup>+46</sup><sub>-42</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AR BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>*</sup> K X</td></tr></tbody></table>

$D_{s,J}(3040)^{\pm}$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Mode</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub></td><td>D<sup>*</sup> K</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub></td><td>D<sup>*0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub></td><td>D<sup>*+</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

$D_{s,J}(3040)^{\pm}$ REFERENCES

AUBERT

09AR PR D80 092003

B. Aubert et al.

(BABAR Collab.)
## BOTTOM MESONS
($B = \pm 1$)

$B^+ = u\bar{b}, B^0 = d\bar{b}, B^0 = \bar{d}b, B^- = \bar{u}b$, similarly for $B^*s$

### B-particle organization

Many measurements of B decays involve admixtures of B hadrons. Previously we arbitrarily included such admixtures in the $B^\pm$ section, but because of their importance we have created two new sections: “$B^\pm/B^0$ Admixture” for $T(4S)$ results and “$B^\pm/B^0/B_S^0$/b-baryon Admixture” for results at higher energies. Most inclusive decay branching fractions and $\chi_b$ at high energy are found in the Admixture sections. $B^0, \bar{B}^0$ mixing data are found in the $B^0$ section, while $B_S^0, \bar{B}_S^0$ mixing data and $B-\bar{B}$ mixing data for a $B^0/B_S^0$ admixture are found in the $B_S^0$ section. CP-violation data are found in the $B^\pm, B^0$, and $B^\pm B^0$ Admixture sections. b-baryons are found near the end of the Baryon section. Recently, we also created a new section: “$V_{cb}$ and $V_{ub}$ CKM Matrix Elements.”

The organization of the B sections is now as follows, where bullets indicate particle sections and brackets indicate reviews.

[Production and Decay of b-flavored Hadrons]

[A Short Note on HFLAV Activities]

* $B^\pm$

mass, mean life

branching fractions

polarization in $B^\pm$ decay

CP violation

* $B^0$

mass, mean life

branching fractions

[Polarization in B decay]

polarization in $B^0$ decay

[B-\bar{B} Mixing]

$B^0, \bar{B}^0$ mixing

CP violation

* $B^\pm, B^0$ Admixture

branching fractions, CP violation

CP violation

* $B^\pm/B^0/B_S^0$/b-baryon Admixture

mean life

production fractions

branching fractions

$\chi_b$ at high energy

production fractions in hadronic $Z$ decay

* $V_{cb}$ and $V_{ub}$ CKM Matrix Elements

[Determination of $V_{cb}$ and $V_{ub}$]

* $B^*, B_1(5721), B_J^*(5732), B_2^*(5747), B_J(5840), B_J(5970)$

mass, width, branching fractions

* $B_S^0$

mass, mean life

branching fractions

polarization in $B_S^0$ decay

$B_S^0, \bar{B}_S^0$ mixing

* $B_s^*, B_{s1}(5830)^0, B_{s2}^*(5840)^0, B_{s,J}^*(5850), B_{s,J}(6063)^0, B_{s,J}(6114)^0$

mass, width, branching fractions

* $B_c^\pm$

mass, mean life

branching fractions

* $B_c(2S)^\pm$

mass, branching fractions

At the end of Baryon Listings:

* $\Lambda_b$

mass, mean life

branching fractions

* $\Lambda_b(5912)^0, \Lambda_b(5920)^0, \Lambda_b(6070)^0, \Lambda_b(6146)^0, \Lambda_b(6152)^0$

mass, width, branchibg fractions

* $\Sigma_b$

mass, width, branching fractions

* $\Sigma_b^*, \Sigma_b(6097)^+, \Sigma_b(6097)^-$
  mass, width, branching fractions

* $\Xi_b^0, \bar{\Xi}_b^-$
  mass, mean life
  branching fractions, P, CP violation

* $\Xi_b^0(5935)^-, \Xi_b(5945)^0, \Xi_b(5955)^-, \Xi_b(6100)^-, \Xi_b(6227)^-, \Xi_b(6227)^0, \Xi_b(6327)^0, \Xi_b(6333)^0$
  mass, width, branching fractions

* $\Omega_b$
  mass, mean life
  branching fractions

* $\Omega_b(6316)^-, \Omega_b(6330)^-, \Omega_b(6340)^-, \Omega_b(6350)^-$
  mass, width, branching fractions

* b-baryon Admixture

mean life

branching fractions

### See the related review(s):
Production and Decay of b-flavored Hadrons

## HEAVY FLAVOR AVERAGING GROUP

Revised February 2024 by U. Egede (Monash University) and A. Soffer (Tel Aviv University)

The Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV) is an international collaboration of physicists from experiments measuring properties of heavy flavored particles, i.e., hadrons containing b and c quarks, and $\tau$ leptons. HFLAV calculates and publishes [1] world average values of quantities such as lifetimes, branching fractions, form factors, mixing parameters, and CP-violating asymmetries. Most parameters concern decays of B and D mesons, and many are related to elements of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) quark mixing matrix [2], [3].

HFLAV was originally formed in 2002 to continue the activities of the LEP Heavy Flavor Steering group. Since its inception, a wide range of results have become available from increasingly larger data sets. Consequently, HFLAV has expanded to include eight subgroups:

* b-hadron lifetimes and oscillations, including parameters of CP violation in b mixing;

* decay-time-dependent CP violation in B decays, and angles of the CKM Unitarity Triangle;

* semileptonic decays of b-hadrons ($B \to X\ell\nu$, $\ell = e, \mu, \tau$), including determinations of the CKM matrix elements $|V_{cb}|$ and $|V_{ub}|$;

* b-hadron decays to hadronic final states containing c-quarks (open charm and charmonium);

* (rarer) b-hadron decays to final states not containing c-quarks, including fully hadronic, semileptonic ($B \to X\ell\ell, X\nu\bar{\nu}$), leptonic, and radiative decays;

* CP- and T-violating asymmetries of D mesons and $D^0-\bar{D}^0$ mixing;

* c-hadron decays (hadronic, semileptonic, leptonic), properties of excited D states and charm baryons and determination of $|V_{cs}|$ and $|V_{cd}|$;

* $\tau$-lepton physics including branching fractions, tests of lepton universality, determination of $|V_{us}|$, and searches for lepton flavor violation.
Each subgroup has one or two conveners and typically a half-dozen members representing experiments that conduct measurements in that area. Most groups contain representatives from the Belle II and LHCb experiments, and some groups have representatives from the ATLAS, BABAR, Belle, BESIII and CMS experiments. Members of HFLAV are appointed by their respective experimental collaborations. HFLAV has two co-leaders, who are appointed by the managements of Belle II and LHCb.

The averaging procedures used by HFLAV are similar to those of the PDG [4]. When sufficient information is available in publications when calculating world averages, common parameters used for different input measurements are adjusted (rescaled) to common values. The p-value of the fit is provided to indicate the consistency of the measurements included in the average. However, unlike the PDG, when obtaining a world average with a low p-value (i.e., a large $\chi^2$ per degree of freedom), HFLAV does not usually scale the resulting uncertainty. Rather, the systematic uncertainties of the measurements are reviewed with experts from the experiments to understand the discrepancy. Unless inconsistencies among measurements are found, no correction is made to the calculated uncertainty. Close communication between representatives of the experiments and HFLAV members who perform averages helps ensure that measurement uncertainties, known correlations, and systematic effects are properly accounted for. If a special treatment is needed to calculate an average, or if an approximation used in an average calculation might not be sufficiently accurate (e.g., assuming Gaussian uncertainties when the likelihood function is non-Gaussian), a note is included in the HFLAV publication and online documentation to describe this.

In general, HFLAV uses all publicly available results that have written documentation such as a journal publication, preprint, or conference note. These include preliminary results presented at conferences and workshops. However, preliminary results that remain unpublished for an extended period of time, or for which no publication is planned, are not included. A special subset of HFLAV averages are included in the PDG listings; for these averages, only measurements that are published or accepted for publication are used. The averages provided by HFLAV are listed by the PDG as “Produced by HFLAV”.

All HFLAV averages and input measurements are documented in an approximately biennial journal paper or preprint; the most recent version is Ref. [1]. The latest results and plots are posted on an extensive set of webpages that are updated several times per year; these are available at

https://hflav.web.cern.ch.

## References:

1. Y. S. Amhis et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group), Phys. Rev. D107, 052008 (2023) [arXiv:2206.07501], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.052008, updated results and plots available at https://hflav.web.cern.ch/.

2. N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963).

3. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).

4. See Section 5 of the “Introduction” to this Review.

$$B^{\pm} \qquad I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(0^{-})$$

Quantum numbers not measured. Values shown are quark-model predictions.

See also the $B^{\pm}/B^0$ ADMIXTURE and $B^{\pm}/B^0/B_S^0$/b-baryon ADMIXTURE sections.

## $B^{\pm}$ MASS

The fit uses $m_{B^{\pm}}$, ($m_{B^0} - m_{B^{\pm}}$), and $m_{B^0}$ to determine $m_{B^{\pm}}$, $m_{B^0}$, and the mass difference.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>5279.41±0.07 OUR FIT</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>5279.42±0.08 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>5279.44±0.05±0.07</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5279.38±0.11±0.33</td><td></td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>12E</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5279.10±0.41±0.36</td><td></td><td>3 ACOSTA</td><td>06</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5279.1±0.4±0.4</td><td>526</td><td>4 CSORNA</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5279.1±1.7±1.4</td><td>147</td><td>ABE</td><td>96B</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>5278.8±0.54±2.0</td><td>362</td><td>ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5278.3±0.4±2.0</td><td></td><td>BORTOLETT092</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5280.5±1.0±2.0</td><td></td><td>5 ALBRECHT</td><td>90J</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5275.8±1.3±3.0</td><td>32</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>87C</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5278.2±1.8±3.0</td><td>12</td><td>6 ALBRECHT</td><td>87D</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5278.6±0.8±2.0</td><td></td><td>BEBEK</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><sup>1</sup> Uses $B^{\pm} \rightarrow J/\psi \overline{\Lambda} p$ decays.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><sup>2</sup> Uses $B^{\pm} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{\pm}$ fully reconstructed decays.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><sup>3</sup> Uses exclusively reconstructed final states containing a $J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decays.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><sup>4</sup> CSORNA 00 uses fully reconstructed 526 $B^{\pm} \rightarrow J/\psi(\gamma) K^{\pm}$ events and invariant masses without beam constraint.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><sup>5</sup> ALBRECHT 90J assumes 10580 for $\tau(4S)$ mass. Supersedes ALBRECHT 87C and ALBRECHT 87D.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><sup>6</sup> Found using fully reconstructed decays with $J/\psi(1S)$. ALBRECHT 87D assume $m_{\tau(4S)} = 10577$ MeV.</td></tr></tbody></table>

## $B^{\pm}$ MEAN LIFE

See $B^{\pm}/B^0/B_S^0$/b-baryon ADMIXTURE section for data on $B$-hadron mean life averaged over species of bottom particles.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>1.638±0.004 OUR EVALUATION</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.637±0.004±0.003</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14E</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.639±0.009±0.009</td><td></td><td>1 AALTONEN</td><td>11</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.663±0.023±0.015</td><td></td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>11B</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.635±0.011±0.011</td><td></td><td>3 ABE</td><td>05B</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.624±0.014±0.018</td><td></td><td>4 ABDALLAH</td><td>04E</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.636±0.058±0.025</td><td></td><td>5 ACOSTA</td><td>02C</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.673±0.032±0.023</td><td></td><td>6 AUBERT</td><td>01F</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.648±0.049±0.035</td><td></td><td>7 BARATE</td><td>00R</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.643±0.037±0.025</td><td></td><td>8 ABBIENDI</td><td>99J</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.637±0.058<sup>+0.045</sup><sub>-0.043</sub></td><td></td><td>7 ABE</td><td>98Q</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.66±0.06±0.03</td><td></td><td>8 ACCIARRI</td><td>98S</td><td>L3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.66±0.06±0.05</td><td></td><td>8 ABE</td><td>97J</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.58<sup>+0.21</sup><sub>-0.18</sub>±0.04</td><td>94</td><td>5 BUSKULIC</td><td>96J</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.61±0.16±0.12</td><td></td><td>7,9 ABREU</td><td>95Q</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.72±0.08±0.06</td><td></td><td>10 ADAM</td><td>95</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.52±0.14±0.09</td><td></td><td>7 AKERS</td><td>95T</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>1.695±0.026±0.015</td><td></td><td>6 ABE</td><td>02H</td><td>BELL Repl. by ABE 05B</td></tr><tr><td>1.68±0.07±0.02</td><td></td><td>5 ABE</td><td>98B</td><td>CDF Repl. by ACOSTA 02C</td></tr><tr><td>1.56±0.13±0.06</td><td></td><td>7 ABE</td><td>96C</td><td>CDF Repl. by ABE 98Q</td></tr><tr><td>1.58±0.09±0.03</td><td></td><td>11 BUSKULIC</td><td>96J</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.58±0.09±0.04</td><td></td><td>7 BUSKULIC</td><td>96J</td><td>Alep Repl. by BARATE 00R</td></tr><tr><td>1.70±0.09</td><td></td><td>12 ADAM</td><td>95</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.61±0.16±0.05</td><td>148</td><td>5 ABE</td><td>94D</td><td>CDF Repl. by ABE 98B</td></tr><tr><td>1.30<sup>+0.33</sup><sub>-0.29</sub>±0.16</td><td>92</td><td>7 ABREU</td><td>93D</td><td>DLPH Sup. by ABREU 95Q</td></tr><tr><td>1.56±0.19±0.13</td><td>134</td><td>10 ABREU</td><td>93G</td><td>DLPH Sup. by ADAM 95</td></tr><tr><td>1.51<sup>+0.30</sup><sub>-0.28</sub>±0.12</td><td>59</td><td>7 ACTON</td><td>93C</td><td>OPAL Sup. by AKERS 95T</td></tr><tr><td>1.47<sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.19</sub>±0.15</td><td>77</td><td>7 BUSKULIC</td><td>93D</td><td>Alep Sup. by BUSKULIC 96J</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote n="1">¹Measured mean life using fully reconstructed decays ($J/\psi K(\gamma^*)$).</footnote>
²Measured using $B^{-} \to D^{0}\pi^{-}$ with $D^{0} \to K^{-}\pi^{+}$ events that were selected using a silicon vertex trigger.

³Measurement performed using a combined fit of CP-violation, mixing and lifetimes.

⁴Measurement performed using an inclusive reconstruction and B flavor identification technique.

⁵Measured mean life using fully reconstructed decays.

⁶Events are selected in which one B meson is fully reconstructed while the second B meson is reconstructed inclusively.

⁷Data analyzed using $D/D^{*}\ell X$ event vertices.

⁸Data analyzed using charge of secondary vertex.

⁹ABREU 95Q assumes $B(B^{0} \to D^{**-} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell}) = 3.2 \pm 1.7\%$.

¹⁰Data analyzed using vertex-charge technique to tag B charge.

¹¹Combined result of $D/D^{*}\ell X$ analysis and fully reconstructed B analysis.

¹²Combined ABREU 95Q and ADAM 95 result.

$\tau_B^+ / \tau_B^-$

VALUE

1.002 $\pm$ 0.004 $\pm$ 0.002

DOCUMENT ID

¹ AAIJ

TECN

COMMENT

¹Measured using $B^{\pm} \to J/\psi K^{\pm}$ decays.

B$^{+}$ DECAY MODES

B$^{-}$ modes are charge conjugates of the modes below. Modes which do not identify the charge state of the B are listed in the $B^{\pm}/B^{0}$ ADMIXTURE section.

The branching fractions listed below assume 50% $B^{0}\bar{B}^{0}$ and 50% $B^{+}B^{-}$ production at the $\tau(4S)$. We have attempted to bring older measurements up to date by rescaling their assumed $\tau(4S)$ production ratio to 50:50 and their assumed $D, D_{S}, D^{*}$, and $\psi$ branching ratios to current values whenever this would affect our averages and best limits significantly.

Indentation is used to indicate a subchannel of a previous reaction. All resonant subchannels have been corrected for resonance branching fractions to the final state so the sum of the subchannel branching fractions can exceed that of the final state.

For inclusive branching fractions, e.g., $B \to D^{\pm}X$, the values usually are multiplicities, not branching fractions. They can be greater than one.

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>f</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Scale factor/<br>Confidence level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>Semileptonic and leptonic modes</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub> X</td><td>[a] (10.99 &pm; 0.28) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> e<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>e</sub> X<sub>c</sub></td><td>(10.8 &pm; 0.4) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub> X<sub>u</sub></td><td>[a] (1.65 &pm; 0.21) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub> D &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub> X</td><td>[a] (9.5 &pm; 0.7) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>5</sub> D<sup>0</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (2.21 &pm; 0.06) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>6</sub> D<sup>0</sup> &tau;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&tau;</sub></td><td>(7.7 &pm; 2.5) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>7</sub> D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (5.53 &pm; 0.22) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>8</sub> D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> e<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>e</sub></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>9</sub> D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> &mu;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&mu;</sub></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>10</sub> D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> &tau;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&tau;</sub></td><td>(1.88 &pm; 0.20) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>11</sub> D<sup>(*)</sup> n&pi; &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub> (n &ge; 1)</td><td>[a] (1.83 &pm; 0.25) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>12</sub> D<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (3.82 &pm; 0.20) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>13</sub> D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(2460)<sup>0</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>*0</sup> &rarr; [a] (1.59 &pm; 0.10) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>14</sub> D<sub>0</sub><sup>+</sup>(2420)<sup>0</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub>, D<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> &rarr; [a] (9 &pm; 5) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup> S=2.6</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>15</sub> D<sup>*-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (5.42 &pm; 0.28) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>16</sub> D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup>(2420)<sup>0</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> &rarr; [a] (2.84 &pm; 0.17) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup> S=1.1</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>17</sub> D<sub>1</sub><sup>*-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>[a] (1.7 &pm; 0.6) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup> S=1.8</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>18</sub> D<sub>2</sub><sup>*-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>[a] (1.06 &pm; 0.18) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup> S=1.7</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>19</sub> D<sup>0</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (1.73 &pm; 0.19) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>20</sub> D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup>(2420)<sup>0</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> &rarr; [a] (1.05 &pm; 0.14) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>21</sub> D<sup>*0</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (7.0 &pm; 1.7) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>22</sub> D<sup>(*)</sup><sub>S</sub> K<sup>+</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (6.1 &pm; 1.0) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>23</sub> D<sub>S</sub><sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (3.0 &pm; 1.4) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>24</sub> D<sub>S</sub><sup>*-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (2.9 &pm; 1.9) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>25</sub> &pi;<sup>0</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (7.80 &pm; 0.27) &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>26</sub> &pi;<sup>0</sup> e<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>e</sub></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>27</sub> &eta;<sup>+</sup> &ell;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (3.5 &pm; 0.4) &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>28</sub> &eta;<sup>'</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (2.4 &pm; 0.7) &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>29</sub> &omega; &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (1.19 &pm; 0.09) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>30</sub> &omega; &mu;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&mu;</sub></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>31</sub> &rho;<sup>0</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (1.58 &pm; 0.11) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>32</sub></td><td>π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (2.3 &pm; 0.4) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>33</sub></td><td>p p&#773; &ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub></td><td>[a] (5.8 &pm; 2.6) &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>34</sub></td><td>p p&#773; &mu;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&mu;</sub></td><td>(5.32 &pm; 0.34) &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>35</sub></td><td>p p&#773; e<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>e</sub></td><td>(8.2 &pm; 4.0) &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>36</sub></td><td>e<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>e</sub></td><td>&lt; 9.8 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>37</sub></td><td>&mu;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&mu;</sub></td><td>&lt; 8.6 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>38</sub></td><td>&tau;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&tau;</sub></td><td>(1.09 &pm; 0.24) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup> S=1.2</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>39</sub></td><td>&ell;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&ell;</sub> &gamma;</td><td>[a] &lt; 3.0 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>40</sub></td><td>e<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>e</sub> &gamma;</td><td>&lt; 4.3 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>41</sub></td><td>&mu;<sup>+</sup> &nu;<sub>&mu;</sub> &gamma;</td><td>&lt; 3.4 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>42</sub></td><td>&mu;<sup>+</sup> &mu;<sup>-</sup> &nu;<sub>&mu;</sub></td><td>&lt; 1.6 &times; 10<sup>-8</sup> CL=95%</td></tr></tbody></table>

Inclusive modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>43</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> X</td><td>(8.6 &pm; 0.7) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>44</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> X</td><td>(79 &pm; 4) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>45</sub></td><td>D<sup>+</sup> X</td><td>(2.5 &pm; 0.5) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>46</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup> X</td><td>(9.9 &pm; 1.2) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>47</sub></td><td>D<sup>+</sup><sub>S</sub> X</td><td>(7.9 &pm; 1.4) &pm; 0.32 %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>48</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup><sub>S</sub> X</td><td>(1.10 &pm; 0.40) &pm; 0.32 %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>49</sub></td><td>&Lambda;<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> X</td><td>(2.1 &pm; 0.9) &pm; 0.6 %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>50</sub></td><td>&Lambda;<sup>-</sup><sub>c</sub> X</td><td>(2.8 &pm; 1.1) &pm; 0.9 %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>51</sub></td><td>cX</td><td>(97 &pm; 4) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>52</sub></td><td>cX</td><td>(23.4 &pm; 2.2) &pm; 1.8 %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>53</sub></td><td>c/cX</td><td>(120 &pm; 6) %</td></tr></tbody></table>

D, D*, or D<sub>S</sub> modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>54</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(4.61 &pm; 0.10) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>55</sub></td><td>D<sub>CP</sub>(+1) &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>[b] (2.03 &pm; 0.19) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>56</sub></td><td>D<sub>CP</sub>(-1) &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>[b] (2.0 &pm; 0.4) &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>57</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> &rho;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(1.34 &pm; 0.18) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>58</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>(3.64 &pm; 0.15) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>59</sub></td><td>D<sub>CP</sub>(+1) K<sup>+</sup></td><td>[b] (1.80 &pm; 0.08) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>60</sub></td><td>D<sub>CP</sub>(-1) K<sup>+</sup></td><td>[b] (1.96 &pm; 0.18) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>61</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>(3.60 &pm; 0.24) &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>62</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>]D K<sup>+</sup></td><td>[c] &lt; 2.8 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>63</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D K<sup>+</sup></td><td>[c] &lt; 2.0 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>64</sub></td><td>[K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>0</sup>]D K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>65</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>0</sup>]D K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>66</sub></td><td>[K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>67</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>68</sub></td><td>[&pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]K<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>69</sub></td><td>[&pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>70</sub></td><td>[K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>]D K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>[c]</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>71</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>[c]</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>72</sub></td><td>[K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>73</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>74</sub></td><td>[K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>]D &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>[c] (6.3 &pm; 1.1) &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>75</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>(1.7 &pm; 0.4) &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>76</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>0</sup>]D &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>77</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>0</sup>]D &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>78</sub></td><td>[K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>79</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>80</sub></td><td>[K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D(&pi;)</sub> &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>81</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D(&pi;)</sub> &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>82</sub></td><td>[K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D(&gamma;)</sub> &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>83</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D(&gamma;)</sub> &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>84</sub></td><td>[K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D(&pi;)</sub> K<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>85</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D(&pi;)</sub> K<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>86</sub></td><td>[K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D(&gamma;)</sub> K<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>87</sub></td><td>[K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D(&gamma;)</sub> K<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>88</sub></td><td>[&pi;<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>0</sup>]D K<sup>-</sup></td><td>(4.6 &pm; 0.9) &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>89</sub></td><td>[K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>90</sub></td><td>[K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>]D K<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>91</sub></td><td>[K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>]D K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>92</sub></td><td>[K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>]D K<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>93</sub></td><td>[K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup> &pi;<sup>+</sup>]D &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>94</sub></td><td>[K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>]D &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>95</sub></td><td>[K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> &pi;<sup>-</sup>]D &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>96</sub></td><td>[K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>]D &pi;<sup>+</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>
Meson Particle Listings

$B^{\pm}$

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ97</td>
      <td>[K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ98</td>
      <td>[K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup>]<sub>D</sub> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ99</td>
      <td>[π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ100</td>
      <td>[π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup>]<sub>D</sub> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ101</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.3 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ102</td>
      <td>D<sub>CP</sub>(-1) K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>[b] ( 2.7 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ103</td>
      <td>D<sub>CP</sub>(+1) K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>[b] ( 6.2 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ104</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.4 ± 1.8 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ105</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.2 ± 2.1 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ106</td>
      <td>[K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ107</td>
      <td>[K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ108</td>
      <td>D<sub>CP</sub>(+1) K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ109</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.5 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ110</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.5 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ111</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.5 ± 2.0 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>S=3.6</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ112</td>
      <td>[K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> nonresonant</td>
      <td>( 5 ± 4 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ113</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> nonresonant</td>
      <td>( 4.2 ± 3.0 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ114</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> ρ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 4 ± 4 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ115</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.1 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ116</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.35 ± 0.22 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ117</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 8.2 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ118</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 8.4 ± 1.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ119</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub>(2420)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ120</td>
      <td>D<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.07 ± 0.05 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ121</td>
      <td>D<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.7 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ122</td>
      <td>D<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(2300)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 6.1 ± 2.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ123</td>
      <td>D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(2460)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.32 ± 0.23 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ124</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup>(2760)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.6 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ125</td>
      <td>D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 2 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ126</td>
      <td>D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.6 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ127</td>
      <td>D<sup>+</sup> η</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ128</td>
      <td>D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(2460)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 6.3 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ129</td>
      <td>D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 4.9 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ130</td>
      <td>D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ131</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.17 ± 0.15 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ132</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>CP</sub>(+1) π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>[d] ( 2.9 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ133</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>CP</sub>(-1) π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>[d] ( 2.6 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ134</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> ωπ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.5 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ135</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> ρ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 9.8 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ136</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.19 ± 0.31 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ137</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>CP</sub>(+1) K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>[d] ( 2.75 ± 0.35 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ138</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>CP</sub>(-1) K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>[d] ( 2.31 ± 0.31 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ139</td>
      <td>D<sup>+</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.5 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ140</td>
      <td>D<sup>+</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 8.1 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ141</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.06 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ142</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.5 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ143</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.03 ± 0.12 ) %</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ144</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.9 ± 0.5 ) %</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ145</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.8 ± 0.4 ) %</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ146</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup><sup>*</sup>(3π<sup>+</sup>2π<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 5.7 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ147</td>
      <td>D<sup>+</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 3.6 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ148</td>
      <td>D<sup>+</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 9.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ149</td>
      <td>D<sup>+</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.5 ± 0.7 ) %</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ150</td>
      <td>D<sup>+</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.6 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ151</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup><sup>**</sup>0 π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>[e] ( 5.6 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ152</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup>(2420)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.5 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>S=1.3</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ153</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub>(2420)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> × B(D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 2.5 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>S=3.8</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ154</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub>(2420)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> × B(D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> (nonresonant))</td>
      <td>( 2.2 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ155</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub>(2430)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.5 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ156</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub>(2550)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.2 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ157</td>
      <td>D<sub>j</sub>(2600)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>j</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 6.8 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ158</td>
      <td>D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(2462)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.56 ± 0.24 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ159</td>
      <td>D<sub>2</sub><sup>*</sup>(2462)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup> →</td>
      <td>( 2.2 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ160</td>
      <td>D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(2462)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup> →</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.6 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ161</td>
      <td>D<sub>2</sub><sup>*</sup>(2462)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup> →</td>
      <td>( 2.1 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ162</td>
      <td>D<sub>0</sub><sup>*</sup>(2400)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> × B(D<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(2400)<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 6.4 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ163</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub>(2421)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> →</td>
      <td>( 7.4 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ164</td>
      <td>D<sub>2</sub><sup>*</sup>(2462)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup> →</td>
      <td>( 1.98 ± 0.30 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ165</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup>(2427)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> →</td>
      <td>( 3.5 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup> S=1.5</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ166</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub>(2420)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> × B(D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>&lt; 6 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ167</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub><sup>*</sup>(2420)<sup>0</sup> ρ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.4 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ168</td>
      <td>D<sub>2</sub><sup>*</sup>(2460)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ169</td>
      <td>D<sub>2</sub><sup>*</sup>(2460)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> × B(D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>&lt; 2.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ170</td>
      <td>D<sub>1</sub><sup>*</sup>(2680)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup>(2680)<sup>0</sup> →</td>
      <td>( 8.4 ± 2.1 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ171</td>
      <td>D<sup>-</sup>(2740)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sup>0</sup> →</td>
      <td>( 3.3 ± 1.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ172</td>
      <td>D<sub>3</sub><sup>*</sup>(2750)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>3</sub><sup>0</sup> →</td>
      <td>( 1.10 ± 0.32 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ173</td>
      <td>D<sub>3</sub><sup>*</sup>(2760)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>3</sub><sup>0</sup>(2760)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.00 ± 0.22 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ174</td>
      <td>D<sub>2</sub><sup>*</sup>(3000)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(3000)<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.0 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ175</td>
      <td>D<sub>2</sub><sup>*</sup>(2460)<sup>0</sup> ρ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 4.7 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ176</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 9.0 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ177</td>
      <td>D<sub>50</sub><sup>*</sup>(2317)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>0</sup>, D<sub>50</sub><sup>+</sup> → D<sub>5</sub><sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 8.0 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ178</td>
      <td>D<sub>50</sub>(2317)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>0</sup> × B(D<sub>50</sub>(2317)<sup>+</sup> → D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup> γ)</td>
      <td>&lt; 7.6 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ179</td>
      <td>D<sub>50</sub>(2317)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> × B(D<sub>50</sub>(2317)<sup>+</sup> → D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup> π<sup>0</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 9 ± 7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ180</td>
      <td>D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.1 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ181</td>
      <td>D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>0</sup> × B(D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> → D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup> γ)</td>
      <td>( 4.6 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ182</td>
      <td>D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>0</sup> × B(D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> → D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>&lt; 2.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ183</td>
      <td>D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>0</sup> × B(D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> → D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup> π<sup>0</sup>)</td>
      <td>&lt; 2.7 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ184</td>
      <td>D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>0</sup> × B(D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> → D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup> γ)</td>
      <td>&lt; 9.8 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ185</td>
      <td>D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.20 ± 0.30 ) %</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ186</td>
      <td>D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> × B(D<sub>sJ</sub>(2457)<sup>+</sup> → D<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup> γ)</td>
      <td>( 1.4 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ187</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sub>51</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup> × B(D<sub>51</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> + D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 4.0 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ188</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sub>51</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup> × B(D<sub>51</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 2.2 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ189</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> D<sub>51</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup> × B(D<sub>51</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 5.5 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ190</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sub>51</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup> × B(D<sub>51</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 2.3 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ191</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sub>sJ</sub>(2700)<sup>+</sup> × B(D<sub>sJ</sub>(2700)<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 5.6 ± 1.8 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup> S=1.7</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ192</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sub>51</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>51</sub><sup>+</sup> → D<sup>+</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.9 ± 2.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ193</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sub>sJ</sub>(2573)<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>sJ</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td>
      <td>( 8 ± 15 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ194</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sub>sJ</sub>(2573), D<sub>sJ</sub><sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 2 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ195</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> D<sub>sJ</sub>(2573), D<sub>sJ</sub><sup>+</sup> →</td>
      <td>&lt; 5 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ196</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> × D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.6 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
$$ \Gamma_{197} \quad \bar{D}^-(D_s^+ \pi^+) \qquad (8.2 \pm 1.7) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{199} \quad \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+ \quad \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+ \quad \bar{D}^* \to \bar{D}^0 \pi^+ $$

$$ \Gamma_{200} \quad \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D_s^+ \quad (1.71 \pm 0.24) \% $$

$$ \Gamma_{201} \quad \bar{D}_2^*(2460)^0 D_s^+ \quad \bar{D}_2^- \to D^- \pi^+ $$

$$ \Gamma_{202} \quad \bar{D}_1^*(2600)^0 D_s^+ \quad \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^- \pi^+ $$

$$ \Gamma_{203} \quad \bar{D}_3^*(2750)^0 D_s^+ \quad \bar{D}_3^0 \to D^- \pi^+ $$

$$ \Gamma_{204} \quad \bar{D}_1^*(2760)^0 D_s^+ \quad \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^- \pi^+ $$

$$ \Gamma_{205} \quad \bar{D}_j^*(3000)^0 D_s^+ \quad \bar{D}_j^0 \to D^- \pi^+ $$

$$ \Gamma_{207} \quad \bar{D}^{(*)+} \bar{D}^{**0} \quad (2.7 \pm 1.2) \% $$

$$ \Gamma_{208} \quad \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D^*(2010)^+ \quad (8.1 \pm 1.7) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{209} \quad \bar{D}^0 D^*(2010)^+ + \quad < 1.30 \quad \% \quad CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{210} \quad \bar{D}^0 D^*(2010)^+ \quad (3.9 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{211} \quad \bar{D}^0 D^+ \quad (3.8 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{212} \quad \bar{D}^0 D^+ K^0 \quad (1.55 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{213} \quad \bar{D}^+ \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \quad (6.3 \pm 1.7) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{214} \quad \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D^+ K^0 \quad (2.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{215} \quad \bar{D}^0 D^*(2010)^+ K^0 \quad (3.8 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{216} \quad \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D^*(2010)^+ K^0 \quad (9.2 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-3} \quad S=2.6 $$

$$ \Gamma_{217} \quad \bar{D}^0 D^0 K^+ \quad (1.45 \pm 0.33) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{218} \quad \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D^0 K^+ \quad (2.26 \pm 0.23) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{219} \quad \bar{D}^0 D^*(2007)^0 K^+ \quad (6.3 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{220} \quad \bar{D}^*(2007)^0 D^*(2007)^0 K^+ \quad (1.12 \pm 0.13) \% $$

$$ \Gamma_{221} \quad D^- D^+ K^+ \quad (2.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{222} \quad T_{cs0}^*(2870)^0 D^+ + T_{cs0}^0 \to \quad (1.2 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-5} $$

$$ \Gamma_{223} \quad T_{cs1}^*(2900)^0 D^+ + T_{cs1}^0 \to \quad (6.7 \pm 2.3) \times 10^{-5} $$

$$ \Gamma_{224} \quad D^- D^+ K^+ \text{ nonresonant} \quad (5.3 \pm 1.8) \times 10^{-5} $$

$$ \Gamma_{225} \quad D^- D^*(2010)^+ K^+ \quad (6.3 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{226} \quad D^*(2010)^- D^+ K^+ \quad (6.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{227} \quad D^*(2010)^- D^*(2010)^+ K^+ \quad (1.32 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{228} \quad (\bar{D}^+ + \bar{D}^*)(D^+ + D^*) K \quad (4.05 \pm 0.30) \% $$

$$ \Gamma_{229} \quad D_s^+ D_s^+ K^+ \quad (1.2 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{230} \quad D_s^+ \pi^0 \quad (1.6 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-5} $$

$$ \Gamma_{231} \quad D_s^+ \pi^0 \quad < 2.6 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{232} \quad D_s^+ \eta \quad < 1.4 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{233} \quad D_s^+ \eta \quad < 1.7 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{234} \quad D_s^+ \rho^0 \quad < 3.0 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{235} \quad D_s^+ \rho^0 \quad < 4 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{236} \quad D_s^+ \omega \quad < 4 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{237} \quad D_s^+ \omega \quad < 6 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{238} \quad D_s^+ a_1(1260)^0 \quad < 1.8 \quad \times 10^{-3} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{239} \quad D_s^+ a_2(1260)^0 \quad < 1.3 \quad \times 10^{-3} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{240} \quad D_s^+ K^+ K^- \quad (7.2 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-6} $$

$$ \Gamma_{241} \quad D_s^+ \phi \quad < 4.2 \quad \times 10^{-7} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{242} \quad D_s^+ \phi \quad < 1.2 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{243} \quad D_s^+ K^0 \quad < 3 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{244} \quad D_s^+ K^0 \quad < 6 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{245} \quad D_s^+ K^*(892)^0 \quad < 4.4 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{246} \quad D_s^+ K^0 \quad < 3.5 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{247} \quad D_s^+ K^*(892)^0 \quad < 3.5 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{248} \quad D_s^-, \pi^+ K^+ \quad (1.80 \pm 0.22) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{249} \quad D_s^-, \pi^+ K^+ \quad (1.45 \pm 0.24) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{250} \quad D_s^-, \pi^+ K^*(892)^+ \quad < 5 \quad \times 10^{-3} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{251} \quad D_s^-, \pi^+ K^*(892)^+ \quad < 7 \quad \times 10^{-3} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{252} \quad D_s^-, K^+ K^+ \quad (9.7 \pm 2.1) \times 10^{-6} $$

$$ \Gamma_{253} \quad D_s^-, K^+ K^+ \quad < 1.5 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

Charmonium modes

$$ \Gamma_{254} \quad \eta_c K^+ \quad (1.10 \pm 0.07) \times 10^{-3} \quad S=1.1 $$

$$ \Gamma_{255} \quad \eta_c K^*(892)^+ \quad (1.2 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{256} \quad \eta_c K^+ \pi^+ \pi^- \quad < 3.9 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{257} \quad \eta_c K^+ \omega(782) \quad < 5.3 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{258} \quad \eta_c K^+ \eta \quad < 2.2 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{259} \quad \eta_c K^+ \pi^0 \quad < 6.2 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{260} \quad \eta_c(2S) K^+ \quad (4.4 \pm 1.0) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{261} \quad \eta_c(2S) K^+, \eta_c \to \rho \bar{D} \quad (3.5 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-8} $$

$$ \Gamma_{262} \quad \eta_c(2S) K^+, \eta_c \to K_S^0 K^\mp \pi^\pm \quad (3.4 \pm 1.6) \times 10^{-6} $$

$$ \Gamma_{263} \quad \eta_c(2S) K^+, \eta_c \to \rho \bar{D} \pi^+ \pi^- \quad (1.12 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-6} $$

$$ \Gamma_{264} \quad \hbar_c(1P) K^+, \hbar_c \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^- \quad < 3.4 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{265} \quad X(3730)^0 K^+, X^0 \to \eta_c \eta \quad < 4.6 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{266} \quad X(3730)^0 K^+, X^0 \to \eta_c \pi^0 \quad < 5.7 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{267} \quad \eta_c(1D) K^+, \eta_c(2) \to \hbar_c \gamma \quad < 3.7 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{268} \quad \eta_c(1D) \pi^+ K_S^0, \eta_c(2) \to \hbar_c \gamma \quad < 1.1 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{269} \quad \psi_2(3823) K^+, \psi_2 \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^- \quad (2.8 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-7} $$

$$ \Gamma_{270} \quad \psi_2(3823) K^+, \psi_2 \to J/\psi \eta \quad (1.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-6} $$

$$ \Gamma_{271} \quad \psi_3(3842) K^+, \psi_3 \to J/\psi \eta \quad < 6.1 \quad \times 10^{-7} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{272} \quad \chi_{c1}(3872) K^+ \quad (2.3 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{273} \quad \chi_{c0}(3915) K^+ \quad < 2.8 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{274} \quad \chi_{c0}(3915) K^+, \chi_{c0} \to D^+ D^- \quad (8.1 \pm 3.3) \times 10^{-6} $$

$$ \Gamma_{275} \quad \chi_{c0}(3915) K^+, \chi_{c0} \to \eta_c \eta \quad < 4.7 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{276} \quad \chi_{c0}(3915) K^+, \chi_{c0} \to \eta_c \pi^0 \quad < 1.7 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{277} \quad X(4014)^0 K^+, X^0 \to \eta_c \eta \quad < 3.9 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{278} \quad X(4014)^0 K^+, X^0 \to \eta_c \pi^0 \quad < 1.2 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{279} \quad T_{c\bar{c}1}(3900)^0 K^+, T_{c\bar{c}1}^0 \to \quad < 4.7 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{280} \quad T_{c\bar{c}1}(3900)^0 K^+, T_{c\bar{c}1}^0 \to \quad < 4.3 \quad \times 10^{-7} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{281} \quad T_{c\bar{c}}(4020)^0 K^+, T_{c\bar{c}}^0 \to \quad < 1.6 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{282} \quad \chi_{c1}(3872) K^*(892)^+ \quad < 6 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{283} \quad \chi_{c1}(3872)^0 K^0, \chi_{c1} \to [f] \quad < 6.1 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{284} \quad \chi_{c1}(3872) K^0 \pi^+ \quad (3.0 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{285} \quad T_{c\bar{c}1}(4430)^+ K^0, T_{c\bar{c}1}^+ \to \quad < 1.5 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=95\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{286} \quad T_{c\bar{c}1}(4430)^+ K^0, T_{c\bar{c}1}^+ \to \quad < 4.7 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=95\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{287} \quad T_{c\bar{c}1}(4430)^0 K^+, T_{c\bar{c}1}^0 \to \quad < 1.27 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{288} \quad \psi(4230)^0 K^+, \psi^0 \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^- \quad < 1.56 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=95\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{289} \quad \psi(4230) K^+, \psi \to J/\psi \eta \quad < 3.9 \quad \times 10^{-7} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{290} \quad \psi(4360) K^+, \psi \to J/\psi \eta \quad < 1.24 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{291} \quad \psi(4390) K^+, \psi \to J/\psi \eta \quad < 2.41 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{292} \quad \chi_{c0}(3915) K^+, \chi_{c0} \to J/\psi \gamma \quad < 1.4 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{293} \quad \chi_{c0}(3915) K^+, \chi_{c0} \to \chi_{c1}(1P) \pi^0 \quad < 3.8 \quad \times 10^{-5} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{294} \quad X(3930)^0 K^+, X^0 \to J/\psi \gamma \quad < 2.5 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{295} \quad J/\psi(1S) K^+ \quad (1.020 \pm 0.019) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{296} \quad J/\psi(1S) K^0 \pi^+ \quad (1.14 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{297} \quad J/\psi(1S) K^+ \pi^+ \pi^- \quad (8.1 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-4} \quad S=2.5 $$

$$ \Gamma_{298} \quad J/\psi(1S) K^+ K^- K^+ \quad (3.37 \pm 0.29) \times 10^{-5} $$

$$ \Gamma_{299} \quad \chi_{c0}(3915) K^+, \chi_{c0} \to \rho \bar{D} \quad < 7.1 \quad \times 10^{-8} CL=95\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{300} \quad J/\psi(1S) K^*(892)^+ \quad (1.43 \pm 0.08) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{301} \quad J/\psi(1S) K(1270)^+ \quad (1.8 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ \Gamma_{302} \quad J/\psi(1S) K(1400)^+ \quad < 5 \quad \times 10^{-4} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{303} \quad J/\psi(1S) \eta K^+ \quad (1.24 \pm 0.14) \times 10^{-4} $$

$$ \Gamma_{304} \quad \chi_{c1-odd}(3872) K^+, \quad \chi_{c1-odd} \to J/\psi \eta \quad < 3.8 \quad \times 10^{-6} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{305} \quad \psi(4160) K^+, \psi \to J/\psi \eta \quad < 8.7 \quad \times 10^{-7} CL=90\% $$

$$ \Gamma_{306} \quad J/\psi(1S) \eta K^+ \quad (3.1 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-5} $$

$$ \Gamma_{307} \quad J/\psi(1S) \phi K^+ \quad (5.0 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-5} $$

$$ \Gamma_{308} \quad J/\psi(1S) K_1(1650), K_1 \to \phi K^+ \quad (6 \pm 10^{-6}) \times 10^{-5} $$

$$ \Gamma_{309} \quad J/\psi(1S) K^*(1680)^+, K^* \to \phi K^+ \quad (3.4 \pm 1.9) \times 10^{-6} $$

$$ \Gamma_{310} \quad J/\psi(1S) K_2^*(1980), K_2^* \to \phi K^+ \quad (1.5 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-6} $$

$$ \Gamma_{311} \quad J/\psi(1S) K(1830)^+, K(1830)^+ \to \phi K^+ \quad (1.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-6} $$

$$ \Gamma_{312} \quad \chi_{c1}(4140) K^+, \chi_{c1} \to J/\psi(1S) \phi \quad (10 \pm 4) \times 10^{-6} $$

$$ \Gamma_{313} \quad \chi_{c1}(4274) K^+, \chi_{c1} \to J/\psi(1S) \phi \quad (3.6 \pm 2.2) \times 10^{-6} $$

$$ \Gamma_{314} \quad \chi_{c0}(4500) K^+, \chi_{c0} \to J/\psi(1S) \phi \quad (3.3 \pm 2.1) \times 10^{-6} $$
# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ315</td><td>χc0(4700)K+, χc0 → J/ψ(1S)φ</td><td>( 6 + 5/4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ316</td><td>J/ψ(1S)ωK+</td><td>( 3.20 + 0.60/0.32 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ317</td><td>χc0(3915)K+, χc0 → J/ψω</td><td>( 3.0 + 0.9/0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ318</td><td>J/ψ(1S)π+</td><td>( 3.92 ± 0.09 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ319</td><td>J/ψ(1S)π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.17 ± 0.13 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ320</td><td>ψ(2S)π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.9 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ321</td><td>J/ψ(1S)ρ+</td><td>( 4.1 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup> S=1.4</td></tr><tr><td>Γ322</td><td>J/ψ(1S)π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>nonresonant</td><td>&lt; 7.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ323</td><td>J/ψ(1S)α<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ324</td><td>J/ψ(1S)p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 5.0 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ325</td><td>J/ψ(1S)p<span style="text-decoration: overline">A</span></td><td>( 1.46 ± 0.12 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ326</td><td>J/ψ(1S)Σ<sup>0</sup>ρ</td><td>&lt; 1.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ327</td><td>J/ψ(1S)D<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ328</td><td>J/ψ(1S)<span style="text-decoration: overline">D</span><sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ329</td><td>ψ(2S)π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 2.44 ± 0.30 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ330</td><td>ψ(2S)K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 6.24 ± 0.21 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ331</td><td>ψ(2S)K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 6.7 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup> S=1.3</td></tr><tr><td>Γ332</td><td>ψ(2S)K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ333</td><td>ψ(2S)K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 4.3 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ334</td><td>ψ(2S)φ(1020)K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 4.0 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ335</td><td>ψ(3770)K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 4.3 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ336</td><td>ψ(3770)K<sup>+</sup>, ψ → D<sup>0</sup><span style="text-decoration: overline">D</span><sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.5 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup> S=1.4</td></tr><tr><td>Γ337</td><td>ψ(3770)K<sup>+</sup>, ψ → D<sup>+</sup>D<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 9.4 ± 3.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ338</td><td>ψ(3770)K<sup>+</sup>, ψ → ρ<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span></td><td>&lt; 2 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=95%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ339</td><td>ψ(3770)K<sup>+</sup>, ψ → J/ψη</td><td>&lt; 4.6 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ340</td><td>ψ(4040)K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.6 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ341</td><td>ψ(4040)K<sup>+</sup>, ψ → D<sup>+</sup>D<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.1 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ342</td><td>ψ(4160)K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 5.1 ± 2.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ343</td><td>ψ(4160)K<sup>+</sup>, ψ → <span style="text-decoration: overline">D</span><sup>0</sup>D<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 8 ± 5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ344</td><td>ψ(4160)K<sup>+</sup>, ψ → D<sup>+</sup>D<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.5 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ345</td><td>ψ(4415)K<sup>+</sup>, ψ → D<sup>+</sup>D<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 2.0 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ346</td><td>ψ(4415)K<sup>+</sup>, ψ → J/ψη</td><td>&lt; 9.6 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ347</td><td>χc0π<sup>+</sup>, χc0 → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 1 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ348</td><td>χc0π<sup>+</sup>, χc0 → π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 5 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ349</td><td>χc0K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.51 + 0.15/0.13 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ350</td><td>χc0K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.45 ± 0.21 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ351</td><td>χc0K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.1 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ352</td><td>χc1(1P)π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 2.2 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ353</td><td>χc1(1P)K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 4.74 ± 0.22 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ354</td><td>χc1(1P)K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 3.0 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup> S=1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Γ355</td><td>χc1(1P)K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 5.8 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ356</td><td>χc1(1P)K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3.29 ± 0.35 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ357</td><td>χc1(1P)K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 3.74 ± 0.30 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ358</td><td>χc1(2P)K<sup>+</sup>, χc1(2P) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>χc1(1P)</td><td>&lt; 1.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ359</td><td>χc2π<sup>+</sup>, χc2 → π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 7 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ360</td><td>χc2K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.1 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ361</td><td>χc2K<sup>+</sup>, χc2 → ρ<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.9 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ362</td><td>χc2K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ363</td><td>χc2K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.24 ± 0.25 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ364</td><td>χc2K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 6.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ365</td><td>χc2K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.34 ± 0.19 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ366</td><td>χc2(3930)K<sup>+</sup>, χc2 → D<sup>+</sup>D<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.6 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ367</td><td>χc2(3930)π<sup>+</sup>, χc2 → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>&lt; 1 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ368</td><td>h<sub>c</sub>(1P)K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 3.7 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ369</td><td>h<sub>c</sub>(1P)K<sup>+</sup>, h<sub>c</sub> → ρ<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span></td><td>&lt; 6.4 × 10<sup>-8</sup> CL=95%</td></tr></tbody></table>

## K or K* modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ370</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 2.39 ± 0.06 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ371</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.32 ± 0.04 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ372</td><td>η'K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 7.04 ± 0.25 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ373</td><td>η'K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 4.8 + 1.8/1.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ374</td><td>η'K<sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 5.2 ± 2.1 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ375</td><td>η'K<sup>2</sup>(1430)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 2.8 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ376</td><td>ηK<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 2.4 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.7</td></tr><tr><td>Γ377</td><td>ηK<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.93 ± 0.16 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ378</td><td>ηK<sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.8 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ379</td><td>ηK<sup>2</sup>(1430)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 9.1 ± 3.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ380</td><td>η(1295)K<sup>+</sup> × B(η(1295) → ηππ)</td><td>( 2.9 + 0.8/0.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ381</td><td>η(1405)K<sup>+</sup> × B(η(1405) → ηππ)</td><td>&lt; 1.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ382</td><td>η(1405)K<sup>+</sup> × B(η(1405) → K<sup>+</sup>K)</td><td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ383</td><td>η(1475)K<sup>+</sup> × B(η(1475) → K<sup>+</sup>K)</td><td>( 1.38 + 0.21/0.18 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ384</td><td>f<sub>1</sub>(1285)K<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ385</td><td>f<sub>1</sub>(1420)K<sup>+</sup> × B(f<sub>1</sub>(1420) → ηππ)</td><td>&lt; 2.9 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ386</td><td>f<sub>1</sub>(1420)K<sup>+</sup> × B(f<sub>1</sub>(1420) → K<sup>+</sup>K)</td><td>&lt; 4.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ387</td><td>φ(1680)K<sup>+</sup> × B(φ(1680) → K<sup>+</sup>K)</td><td>&lt; 3.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ388</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(1500)K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 3.7 ± 2.2 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ389</td><td>ωK<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 6.5 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ390</td><td>ωK<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 7.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ391</td><td>ω(Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>+</sup></td><td>( 2.8 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ392</td><td>ωK<sup>*</sup><sub>0</sub>(1430)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 2.4 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ393</td><td>ωK<sup>2</sup><sub>0</sub>(1430)<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 2.1 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ394</td><td>a<sub>0</sub>(980)K<sup>+</sup> × B(a<sub>0</sub>(980)<sup>+</sup> → ηπ<sup>+</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 3.9 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ395</td><td>a<sub>0</sub>(980)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> × B(a<sub>0</sub>(980)<sup>0</sup> → ηπ<sup>0</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 2.5 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ396</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.01 ± 0.08 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ397</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 6.8 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ398</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 5.10 ± 0.29 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ399</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>nonresonant</td><td>( 1.63 + 0.21/0.15 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ400</td><td>ω(782)K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 6 ± 9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ401</td><td>K<sup>+</sup> f<sub>0</sub>(980) × B(f<sub>0</sub>(980) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>( 9.4 + 1.0/1.2 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ402</td><td>f<sub>2</sub>(1270)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.07 ± 0.27 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ403</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(1370)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> × B(f<sub>0</sub>(1370)<sup>0</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 1.07 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ404</td><td>ρ(14500)K<sup>+</sup> × B(ρ(1450)<sup>0</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 1.17 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ405</td><td>f'<sub>2</sub>(1525)K<sup>+</sup> × B(f'<sub>2</sub>(1525) → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 3.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ406</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3.7 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ407</td><td>K<sup>*</sup><sub>0</sub>(1430)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 3.9 + 0.6/0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup> S=1.4</td></tr><tr><td>Γ408</td><td>K<sup>*</sup><sub>2</sub>(1430)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 5.6 + 2.2/1.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ409</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(1410)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 4.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ410</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(1680)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ411</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.62 ± 0.19 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ412</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(980)K<sup>+</sup> × B(f<sub>0</sub> → π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)</td><td>( 2.8 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ413</td><td>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 4.6 × 10<sup>-8</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ414</td><td>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>nonresonant</td><td>&lt; 5.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ415</td><td>K<sub>1</sub>(1270)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 4.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ416</td><td>K<sub>1</sub>(1400)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ417</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 6.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ418</td><td>K<sup>*</sup><sub>0</sub>(1430)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.19 + 0.20/0.23 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ419</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>ρ<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 7.3 + 1.0/1.2 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ420</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 7.5 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ421</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 4.6 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ422</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup> f<sub>0</sub>(980)</td><td>( 4.2 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ423</td><td>a<sub>1</sub><sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 3.5 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ424</td><td>b<sub>1</sub><sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup> × B(b<sub>1</sub><sup>+</sup> → ωπ<sup>+</sup>)</td><td>( 9.6 ± 1.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ425</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>ρ<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 9.2 ± 1.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ426</td><td>K<sub>1</sub>(1400)<sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 7.8 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ427</td><td>K<sup>2</sup><sub>0</sub>(1430)<sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.5 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ428</td><td>b<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>K<sup>+</sup> × B(b<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> → ωπ<sup>0</sup>)</td><td>( 9.1 ± 2.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ429</td><td>b<sup>+</sup><sub>1</sub>K<sup>0</sup> × B(b<sub>1</sub><sup>+</sup> → ωπ<sup>+</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 5.9 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ430</td><td>b<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>K<sup>+</sup> × B(b<sub>1</sub><sup>0</sup> → ωπ<sup>0</sup>)</td><td>&lt; 6.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ431</td><td>K<sup>+</sup><span style="text-decoration: overline">K</span><sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.32 ± 0.17 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.2</td></tr><tr><td>Γ432</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 2.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ433</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>0</sup>S</td><td>( 1.05 ± 0.04 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ434</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(980)K<sup>+</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → K<sup>0</sup>S K<sup>0</sup>S</td><td>( 1.47 ± 0.33 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ435</td><td>f<sub>0</sub>(1710)K<sup>+</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → K<sup>0</sup>S K<sup>0</sup>S</td><td>( 4.8 + 4.0/2.6 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ436</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>0</sup>S nonresonant</td><td>( 2.0 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ437</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>S K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 5.1 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ438</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 5.2 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ439</td><td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>nonresonant</td><td>( 1.68 ± 0.26 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ440</td><td>K<sup>+</sup><span style="text-decoration: overline">K</span><sup>0</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 5.9 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>
Meson Particle Listings

B±

See key on page 1171

Light unflavored meson modes

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ501</td>
      <td>ρ<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 9.8 ± 2.5 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ502</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.31 ± 0.26 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ503</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.52 ± 0.14 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ504</td>
      <td>ρ<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 8.3 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ505</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup> f<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.5 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ506</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup> f<sub>2</sub>(1270)</td>
      <td>( 2.2 <sup>+ 0.7</sup><sub>- 0.4</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ507</td>
      <td>ρ(1450)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>, ρ<sup>0</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.4 <sup>+ 0.6</sup><sub>- 0.9</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ508</td>
      <td>ρ(1450)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>, ρ<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.60 ± 0.14 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ509</td>
      <td>f<sub>0</sub>(1370)π<sup>+</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 4.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ510</td>
      <td>f<sub>0</sub>(1370)π<sup>+</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ511</td>
      <td>f<sub>0</sub>(500)π<sup>+</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 4.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ512</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.3 <sup>+ 1.5</sup><sub>- 1.1</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ513</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.90 ± 0.21 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ514</td>
      <td>ρ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.06 <sup>+ 0.12</sup><sub>- 0.13</sub> ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ515</td>
      <td>ρ(1450)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, ρ<sup>+</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.2 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ516</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 6 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ517</td>
      <td>Xpi+, X → π<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 6.9 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ518</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 4.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ519</td>
      <td>ρ<sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.40 ± 0.19 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ520</td>
      <td>ρ<sup>+</sup>f<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 2.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ521</td>
      <td>a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.6 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ522</td>
      <td>a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.0 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ523</td>
      <td>ωπ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 6.9 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ524</td>
      <td>ωρ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.59 ± 0.21 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ525</td>
      <td>ηπ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.02 ± 0.27 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ526</td>
      <td>ηρ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.0 ± 2.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=2.8</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ527</td>
      <td>η′π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.7 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.9</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ528</td>
      <td>η′ρ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 9.7 ± 2.2 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ529</td>
      <td>φπ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.2 ± 1.5 ) × 10<sup>-8</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ530</td>
      <td>φρ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 3.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ531</td>
      <td>a<sub>0</sub>(980)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>, a<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> → ηπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 5.8 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ532</td>
      <td>a<sub>0</sub>(980)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, a<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> → ηπ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ533</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 8.6 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ534</td>
      <td>ρ<sup>0</sup>a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 6.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ535</td>
      <td>ρ<sup>0</sup>a<sub>2</sub>(1320)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 7.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ536</td>
      <td>b<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>, b<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> → ωπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 6.7 ± 2.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ537</td>
      <td>b<sub>1</sub><sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, b<sub>1</sub><sup>+</sup> → ωπ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 3.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ538</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 6.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ539</td>
      <td>b<sub>1</sub><sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup>, b<sub>1</sub><sup>+</sup> → ωπ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 5.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ540</td>
      <td>a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>+</sup> a<sub>1</sub>(1260)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.3 % CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ541</td>
      <td>b<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>, b<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> → ωπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 3.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

Charged particle (h±) modes

$h^{\pm} = K^{\pm} \text{ or } \pi^{\pm}$

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ542</td>
      <td>h<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.6 <sup>+ 0.7</sup><sub>- 0.6</sub> ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ543</td>
      <td>ωh<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.38 <sup>+ 0.27</sup><sub>- 0.24</sub> ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ544</td>
      <td>h<sup>+</sup>X<sup>0</sup> (Familon)</td>
      <td>&lt; 4.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ545</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>X<sup>0</sup>, X<sup>0</sup> → μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=95%</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

Baryon modes

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ546</td>
      <td>ρpπ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.62 ± 0.20 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ547</td>
      <td>p pπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 5.3 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ548</td>
      <td>p pπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.6 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ549</td>
      <td>p pπ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 5.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ550</td>
      <td>p pK<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.9 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.5</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ551</td>
      <td>Θ(1710)<sup>++</sup> p, Θ<sup>++</sup> → pK<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>[g] &lt; 9.1 × 10<sup>-8</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ552</td>
      <td>f<sub>j</sub>(2220) K<sup>+</sup>, f<sub>j</sub> → p p</td>
      <td>[g] &lt; 4.1 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ553</td>
      <td>p pπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 6.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ554</td>
      <td>p pλ(1520)</td>
      <td>( 3.1 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ555</td>
      <td>p pK<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 8.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ556</td>
      <td>p pK<sup>+</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.6 <sup>+ 0.8</sup><sub>- 0.7</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ557</td>
      <td>f<sub>j</sub>(2220) K<sup>*+</sup>, f<sub>j</sub> → p p</td>
      <td>&lt; 7.7 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ558</td>
      <td>p pλ</td>
      <td>( 2.4 <sup>+ 1.0</sup><sub>- 0.9</sub> ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ559</td>
      <td>p pλγ</td>
      <td>( 2.4 <sup>+ 0.5</sup><sub>- 0.4</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ560</td>
      <td>p pλπ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.0 <sup>+ 0.7</sup><sub>- 0.6</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ561</td>
      <td>p pΣ(1385)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 4.7 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ562</td>
      <td>Δ<sup>+</sup>λ</td>
      <td>&lt; 8.2 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ441</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.8 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ442</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup>(K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>) S-wave</td>
      <td>( 8.5 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ443</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>, m<sub>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></sub> &lt; 1.1</td>
      <td>( 5.4 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ444</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.1 × 10<sup>-8</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ445</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 8.79 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ446</td>
      <td>f<sub>2</sub>'(1525) K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.8 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.1</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ447</td>
      <td>K<sup>*+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.18 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ448</td>
      <td>K<sup>*+</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>K<sup>*+</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 9.1 ± 2.9 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ449</td>
      <td>K<sup>*+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 6.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ450</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.40 ± 0.14 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup> S=1.4</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ451</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>φ</td>
      <td>( 8.8 <sup>+ 0.7</sup><sub>- 0.6</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.1</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ452</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>φ</td>
      <td>( 9.4 ± 3.2 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ453</td>
      <td>f<sub>0</sub>(980) K<sup>+</sup> × B(f<sub>0</sub>(980) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ454</td>
      <td>a<sub>2</sub>(1320) K<sup>+</sup> × B(a<sub>2</sub>(1320) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ455</td>
      <td>X<sub>0</sub>(1550) K<sup>+</sup> × B(χ<sub>0</sub>(1550) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 4.3 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ456</td>
      <td>φ(1680) K<sup>+</sup> × B(φ(1680) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>&lt; 8 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ457</td>
      <td>f<sub>0</sub>(1710) K<sup>+</sup> × B(f<sub>0</sub>(1710) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)</td>
      <td>( 1.1 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ458</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.38 <sup>+ 0.28</sup><sub>- 0.50</sub> ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ459</td>
      <td>K<sup>*+</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.6 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ460</td>
      <td>K<sup>*+</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>φ</td>
      <td>( 10.0 ± 2.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.7</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ461</td>
      <td>K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.40 ± 0.33 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ462</td>
      <td>J/ψK<sup>+</sup>, J/ψ → K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.4 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ463</td>
      <td>χ<sub>c1</sub>K<sup>+</sup>, χ<sub>c1</sub> → K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.25 ± 0.25 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ464</td>
      <td>η<sub>c</sub>K<sup>+</sup>, η<sub>c</sub> → K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.83 ± 0.30 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ465</td>
      <td>η<sub>c</sub>(2S) K<sup>+</sup>, η<sub>c</sub>(2S) → K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.3 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ466</td>
      <td>K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.80 ± 0.30 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ467</td>
      <td>J/ψK<sup>+</sup>, J/ψ → K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.4 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ468</td>
      <td>χ<sub>c1</sub>K<sup>+</sup>, χ<sub>c1</sub> → K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.06 ± 0.32 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ469</td>
      <td>η<sub>c</sub>K<sup>+</sup>, η<sub>c</sub> → K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.00 ± 0.34 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ470</td>
      <td>η<sub>c</sub>(2S) K<sup>+</sup>, η<sub>c</sub>(2S) → K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.1 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ471</td>
      <td>φ(Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 8.3 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ472</td>
      <td>φK<sub>1</sub>(1270)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 6.1 ± 1.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ473</td>
      <td>φK<sub>1</sub>(1400)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 3.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ474</td>
      <td>φK<sup>*+</sup>(1410)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 4.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ475</td>
      <td>φK<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.0 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ476</td>
      <td>φK<sup>*+</sup><sub>2</sub>(1430)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 8.4 ± 2.1 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ477</td>
      <td>φK<sub>2</sub>(1770)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.50 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ478</td>
      <td>φK<sup>*+</sup><sub>2</sub>(1820)<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.63 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ479</td>
      <td>δ<sub>1</sub><sup>+</sup>K<sup>*0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 3.6 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ480</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>φφ</td>
      <td>( 4.2 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=2.2</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ481</td>
      <td>η<sup>+</sup>η<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 2.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ482</td>
      <td>ωφK<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.9 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ483</td>
      <td>X(1812) K<sup>+</sup> × B(X → ωφ)</td>
      <td>&lt; 3.2 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ484</td>
      <td>K<sup>*+</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 3.92 ± 0.22 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup> S=1.7</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ485</td>
      <td>K<sub>1</sub>(1270)<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 4.4 <sup>+ 0.7</sup><sub>- 0.6</sub> ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ486</td>
      <td>ηK<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 7.9 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ487</td>
      <td>η<sup>+</sup>K<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 2.9 <sup>+ 1.0</sup><sub>- 0.9</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ488</td>
      <td>φK<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 2.7 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.2</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ489</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.58 ± 0.15 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup> S=1.3</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ490</td>
      <td>K<sup>*+</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 2.33 ± 0.12 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ491</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 8.2 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ492</td>
      <td>(K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)<sub>NR</sub>π<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 9.9 <sup>+ 1.7</sup><sub>- 2.0</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ493</td>
      <td>K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 4.6 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ494</td>
      <td>K<sub>1</sub>(1400)<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 10 <sup>+ 5</sup><sub>- 4</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ495</td>
      <td>K<sup>*+</sup>(1410)<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 2.7 <sup>+ 0.8</sup><sub>- 0.6</sub> ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ496</td>
      <td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 1.32 <sup>+ 0.26</sup><sub>- 0.32</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ497</td>
      <td>K<sup>*2</sup><sub>2</sub>(1430)<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 1.4 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ498</td>
      <td>K<sup>*+</sup>(1680)<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>( 6.7 <sup>+ 1.7</sup><sub>- 1.4</sub> ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ499</td>
      <td>K<sup>*3</sup>(1780)<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>&lt; 3.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ500</td>
      <td>K<sup>*4</sup>(2045)<sup>+</sup>γ</td>
      <td>&lt; 9.9 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
<figure><img src="image_574.png" /></figure>

FIT INFORMATION

A multiparticle fit to η_c(1S), J/ψ(1S), ψ(2S), h_c(1P), and B^± with the total width, 10 combinations of partial widths obtained from integrated cross section, and 38 branching ratios uses 113 measurements to determine 19 parameters. The overall fit has a χ² = 184.6 for 94 degrees of freedom.

B⁺ BRANCHING RATIOS

$$ \Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_e X) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{1/\Gamma} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

10.99±0.28 OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)

10.76±0.32 OUR AVERAGE

11.17±0.25±0.28

1 URQUIJO 07 BELL

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

10.28±0.26±0.39

2 AUBERT, B 06Y

BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

10.25±0.57±0.65

3 ARTUSO 97 CLE2

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

11.15±0.26±0.41

4 OKABE 05 BELL

Repl. by URQUIJO 07

10.1 ±1.8 ±1.5

ATHANAS 94 CLE2

Sup. by ARTUSO 97

¹URQUIJO 07 report a measurement of (10.34 ± 023 ± 0.25)% for the partial branching fraction of B⁺ → e⁺ν_eXc decay with electron energy above 0.6 GeV. We converted the result to B⁺ → e⁺ν_eX branching fraction.

²The measurements are obtained for charged and neutral B mesons partial rates of semileptonic decay to electrons with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c in the B rest frame. The best precision on the ratio is achieved for a momentum threshold of 1.0 GeV: B(B⁺ → e⁺ν_eX) / B(B⁰ → e⁺ν_eX) = 1.074 ± 0.041 ± 0.026.

³ARTUSO 97 uses partial reconstruction of B → D⁺ℓν_ℓ and inclusive semileptonic branching ratio from BARISH 96B (0.1049 ± 0.0017 ± 0.0043).

⁴The measurements are obtained for charged and neutral B mesons partial rates of semileptonic decay to electrons with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c in the B rest frame, and their ratio of B(B⁺ → e⁺ν_eX)/B(B⁰ → e⁺ν_eX) = 1.08 ± 0.05 ± 0.02.

$$ \Gamma(e^+ \nu_e X_c) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{2/\Gamma} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

10.79±0.25±0.27

1 URQUIJO 07 BELL

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹Measure the independent B⁺ and B⁰ partial branching fractions with electron threshold energies of 0.4 GeV.

$$ \Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_e X_u) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{3/\Gamma} $$

Requires E_ℓ⁺ > 1 GeV, where E_ℓ⁺ is lepton energy in B rest frame.

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

1.65±0.10±0.18

1 CAO

21A BELL

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹The correlation of 50% with B(B⁰ → ℓ⁺ν_ℓX_u)(lepton energy in B rest frame E_ℓ⁺ > 1 GeV) was reported.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \ell^+ \nu_e) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{5/\Gamma} $$

ℓ = e or μ, not sum over e and μ modes.

VALUE (%)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

2.21±0.06 OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)

2.29±0.08 OUR AVERAGE

2.29±0.08±0.09

1 AUBERT 10 BABR

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

2.34±0.03±0.13

AUBERT 09A BABR

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

2.21±0.13±0.19

2 BARTELT 99 CLE2

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1.6 ±0.6 ±0.3

3 FULTON 91 CLEO

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

2.33±0.09±0.09

1 AUBERT 08Q BABR

Repl. by AUBERT 09A

1.94±0.15±0.34

4 ATHANAS 97 CLE2

Repl. by BARTELT 99

¹Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³FULTON 91 assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at the T(4S).

⁴ATHANAS 97 uses missing energy and missing momentum to reconstruct neutrino.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \ell^+ \nu_e) / \Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_e X) \qquad \Gamma_{5/\Gamma_1} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

0.255±0.009±0.009

1 AUBERT 10 BABR

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹Uses a fully reconstructed B meson on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \ell^+ \nu_e) / \Gamma(D^0 \ell^+ \nu_e X) \qquad \Gamma_{5/\Gamma_4} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

0.230±0.020 OUR AVERAGE

0.25 ±0.06

1 AAIJ 19AC

LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

0.227±0.014±0.016

2 AUBERT 07AN

BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹The relative branching fractions of B⁻ → D⁰, D*⁰, D**⁰ in the B⁻ → D⁰X_μν channel are determined by fitting the distribution of the missing mass in B_s⁰ → B⁻K⁺ decays.

²Uses a fully reconstructed B meson on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \tau^+ \nu_\tau) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_6 / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

0.77±0.22±0.12

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

1 BOZEK 10 BELL

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.67±0.37±0.13

2 AUBERT 08N

BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09S

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \tau^+ \nu_\tau) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \qquad \Gamma_6 / \Gamma_5 $$

VALUE

0.44 ±0.07 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

0.441±0.060±0.066

1 AAIJ 23AR

LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

0.429±0.082±0.052

2,3 LEES 12D BABR

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.314±0.170±0.049

2 AUBERT 09S

BABR Repl. by LEES 12D

¹Uses τ⁺ → μ⁺ν_μν_τ and μ⁺ as ℓ⁺.

²Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

³Uses τ⁺ → e⁺ν_eν_τ and τ⁺ → μ⁺ν_μν_τ and e⁺ or μ⁺ as ℓ⁺.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_7 / \Gamma $$

ℓ = e or μ, not sum over e and μ modes.

VALUE (%)

EVTs

TECN

COMMENT

5.53±0.22 OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)

5.60±0.26 OUR FIT

5.58±0.26 OUR AVERAGE

5.40±0.02±0.21

AUBERT 09A

BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

5.56±0.08±0.41

1 AUBERT 08AT

BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

6.50±0.20±0.43

2 ADAM 03 CLE2

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

6.6 ±1.6 ±1.5

3 ALBRECHT 92C

ARG e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

5.83±0.15±0.30

4 AUBERT 08Q

BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09A

6.50±0.20±0.43

5 BRIERE 02 CLE2

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

5.13±0.54±0.64

6 BARISH 95 CLE2

Repl. by ADAM 03

seen 302

7 SANGHERA 93 CLE2

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

4.1 ±0.8 ±0.8

8 FULTON 91 CLEO

e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

7.0 ±1.8 ±1.4

9 ANTREASYAN 90B

CBAL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

¹Measured using the dependence of B⁻ → D*⁰e⁻ν_e decay differential rate and the form factor description by CAPRINI 98.

²Simultaneous measurements of both B⁰ → D*(2010)⁻ℓν and B⁺ → D̄(2007)⁰ℓν.

³ALBRECHT 92C reports 0.058±0.014±0.013. We rescale using the method described in STONE 94 but with the updated PDG 94 B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺). Assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at the T(4S).

⁴Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

⁵The results are based on the same analysis and data sample reported in ADAM 03.

⁶BARISH 95 use B(D⁰ → K⁻π⁺) = (3.91 ± 0.08 ± 0.17)% and B(D*⁰ → D⁰π⁰) = (63.6 ± 2.3 ± 3.3)%.

⁷Combining D̄*⁰ℓ⁺ν_ℓ and D*⁰ℓ⁺ν_ℓ SANGHERA 93 test V-A structure and fit the decay angular distributions to obtain A<sub>FB</sub> = 3/4(Γ⁻ → Γ⁺) / Γ = 0.14 ± 0.06 ± 0.03. Assuming a value of V<sub>C</sub>, they measure V<sub>1</sub>, and A<sub>2</sub>, the three form factors for the D*⁰ℓ<sub>ℓ</sub> decay, where results are slightly dependent on model assumptions.

⁸Assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at the T(4S). Uncorrected for D and D* branching ratio assumptions.

⁹ANTREASYAN 90B is average over B and D̄(2010) charge states.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
5.58±0.26 (Error scaled by 1.5)

<figure><img src="image_575.png" /></figure>

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_7 / \Gamma $$
# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(200)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma(D^\ell \nu_\ell X) \qquad \Gamma_7 / \Gamma_4 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.582±0.018±0.030</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AN BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses a fully reconstructed B meson on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(200)^0 \ell^+ \nu_e) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(200)^0 \mu^+ \nu_\mu) \qquad \Gamma_8 / \Gamma_9 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.976±0.029±0.023</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(200)^0 \tau^+ \nu_\tau) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{10} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.88±0.20 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.12<sup>+0.28</sup><sub>-0.27</sub>±0.29</td><td>1 BOZEK</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.25±0.48±0.28</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08N BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09s</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the T(45).

²Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(200)^0 \tau^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(200)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \qquad \Gamma_{10} / \Gamma_7 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.335±0.034 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.322±0.032±0.022</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.346±0.073±0.034</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09s BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 12D</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

²Uses $\tau^+ \to e^+ \nu_e \bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $\tau^+ \to \mu^+ \nu_\mu \bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $e^+ \mu^+ \to \ell^+ \nu_\ell$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(n\pi\ell^+ \nu_\ell(n \ge 1)) / \Gamma(D^\ell \nu_\ell X) \qquad \Gamma_{11} / \Gamma_4 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.193±0.022 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.21 ± 0.07</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>19AC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.191±0.013±0.019</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>07AN BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The relative branching fractions of $B^- \to D^0$, $D^{*0}$, $D^{*0}$ refers collectively to L = 1 states $D_2^*(2400)$, $D_1(2420)$, $D_1(2430)$, and $D_2^*(2460)$, as well as other resonances such as radially excited D mesons, and to nonresonant contributions with additional pions.

²In this measurement of $f_{D^{*0}} = B(B^- \to D^{(*)0} \to D^0 X)\mu^-\bar{\nu}^- / B(B^- \to D^0 X\mu^-\bar{\nu}^-)$, $D^{*0}$ refers collectively to L = 1 states $D_2^*(2400)$, $D_1(2420)$, $D_1(2430)$, and $D_2^*(2460)$, as well as other resonances such as radially excited D mesons, and to nonresonant contributions with additional pions.

³Uses a fully reconstructed B meson on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(D^{-} \pi^{+} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{12} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.82±0.20 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.78±0.13±0.17</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.55±0.27±0.39</td><td>VOSSEN</td><td>18 BELL</td><td>Repl. by MEIER 23</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.1 ± 0.6 ± 0.1</td><td>1,2 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>Repl. by VOSSEN 18</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.3 ± 0.9 ± 0.1</td><td>3 LIVENTSEV</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIVENTSEV 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

²LIVENTSEV 08 reports $(4.0 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D^- \pi^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to D^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell)]$ assuming $B(B^+ \to D^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) = (2.15 \pm 0.22) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(B^+ \to D^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) = (2.21 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³LIVENTSEV 05 reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D^- \pi^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to D^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)] = 0.25 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.03$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to D^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) = (2.12 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^*(2460)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell, \bar{D}_2^0 \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{13} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.59±0.10 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.63±0.11±0.07</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.42±0.15±0.15</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09Y BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.5 ± 0.2 ± 0.2</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08BL BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.2 ± 0.3 ± 0.4</td><td>2 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses a simultaneous fit of all B semileptonic decays without full reconstruction of events. AUBERT 09Y reports $B(B^+ \to \bar{D}_2^*(2460)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \cdot B(\bar{D}_2^*(2460)^0 \to D^{(*)-} \pi^+) = (2.29 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-3}$ and the authors have provided us the individual measurement.

²Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_0^*(2420)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell, \bar{D}_0^0 \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{14} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.9 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.6. See the ideogram below.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.54±0.22±0.05</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.6 ± 0.5 ± 0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BL BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.4 ± 0.4 ± 0.6</td><td>1 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

<figure><img src="image_576.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_0^*(2420)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell, \bar{D}_0^0 \to D^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-3}) $$

$$ \Gamma(D^{-} \pi^{+} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{15} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.42±0.28 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.30±0.19±0.25</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.9 ± 0.5 ± 0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08Q BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>6.03±0.43±0.38</td><td>VOSSEN</td><td>18 BELL</td><td>Repl. by MEIER 23</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>6.6 ± 1.0 ± 0.2</td><td>1,2 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>Repl. by VOSSEN 18</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.9 ± 1.4 ± 0.1</td><td>3,4 LIVENTSEV</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIVENTSEV 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

²LIVENTSEV 08 reports $(6.4 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D^{*-} \pi^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to D^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell)]$ assuming $B(B^+ \to D^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) = (2.15 \pm 0.22) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(B^+ \to D^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) = (2.21 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³Excludes $D^+\pi^+$ contribution to $D\pi$ modes.

⁴LIVENTSEV 05 reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to D^{*-} \pi^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to D^{*}(2010)^{-} \ell^+ \nu_\ell)] = 0.12 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.02$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to D^{*}(2010)^{-} \ell^+ \nu_\ell) = (4.90 \pm 0.12) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1(2420)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^{*-} \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{16} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.84±0.17 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.49±0.23±0.14</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.97±0.17±0.17</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09Y BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.9 ± 0.3 ± 0.3</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08BL BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.2 ± 0.7 ± 0.7</td><td>2 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.73±0.85±0.57</td><td>3 ANASTASSOV</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses a simultaneous measurement of all B semileptonic decays without full reconstruction of events.

²Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

³Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1^*(2430)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell, \bar{D}_1^0 \to D^{*-} \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{17} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.7 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.8.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.38±0.36±0.08</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.7 ± 0.4 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BL BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^*(2460)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell, \bar{D}_2^0 \to D^{*-} \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{18} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.06±0.18 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.7.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.37±0.26±0.09</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.87±0.11±0.07</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09Y BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.5 ± 0.2 ± 0.2</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08BL BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.8 ± 0.6 ± 0.3</td><td>2 LIVENTSEV</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6</td><td>90</td><td>3 ANASTASSOV</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses a simultaneous fit of all B semileptonic decays without full reconstruction of events. AUBERT 09Y reports $B(B^+ \to \bar{D}_2^*(2460)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \cdot B(\bar{D}_2^*(2460)^0 \to D^{(*)-} \pi^+) = (2.29 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-3}$ and the authors have provided us the individual measurement.
<figure><img src="image_577.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{19/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.73&plusmn;0.14&plusmn;0.13</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma(\bar{D}_2^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \quad \Gamma_{19/\Gamma_5} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.1&plusmn;1.3&plusmn;0.8</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>16</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measurement used electrons and muons as leptons.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1(2420)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell, \bar{D}_1^0 \to \bar{D}_2^0 \pi^+ \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{20/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.05&plusmn;0.11&plusmn;0.08</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*0 \pi^+ \pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \quad \Gamma_{21/\Gamma_7} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.4&plusmn;0.7&plusmn;0.4</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>16</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measurement used electrons and muons as leptons.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*0 \pi^+ \pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{21/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.0&plusmn;1.5&plusmn;0.8</td><td>MEIER</td><td>23</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_5^*(\ell^-) K^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{22/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>6.1 &plusmn; 1.0</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.9 &plusmn; 1.2 &plusmn; 1.5</td><td>1 STYPULA</td><td>12</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>6.13<sup>+1.04</sup><sub>-1.03</sub> &plusmn; 0.67</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..11L</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_5^-(K^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{23/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.0&plusmn;0.9<sup>+1.1</sup><sub>-0.8</sub></td><td>1 STYPULA</td><td>12</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_5^*(K^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{24/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.9&plusmn;1.6<sup>+1.1</sup><sub>-1.0</sub></td><td>1,2 STYPULA</td><td>12</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²STYPULA 12 provides also an upper limit of $0.56 \times 10^{-3}$ at 90% CL for the same data. Also measures branching fraction of the combined modes of $D_s^- K^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell$ and $D_s^* - K^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell$ as $B(\bar{B}^+ \to D_s^*(\ell^-) K^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell) = (5.9 \pm 1.2 \pm 1.5) \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{25/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.780 &plusmn; 0.027</b> OUR EVALUATION<br><b>0.748 &plusmn; 0.029</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.80 &plusmn; 0.08 &plusmn; 0.04</td><td>1 SIBIDANOV</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.77 &plusmn; 0.04 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12AA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.705 &plusmn; 0.025 &plusmn; 0.035</td><td>3 DEL-AMO-SA..11C</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.82 &plusmn; 0.09 &plusmn; 0.05</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>08AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.77 &plusmn; 0.14 &plusmn; 0.08</td><td>4 HOKUUE</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.74 &plusmn; 0.05 &plusmn; 0.10</td><td>5 AUBERT, B</td><td>050 BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11C</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^0 e^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{26/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.9 &plusmn; 0.2 &plusmn; 0.2</td><td>1 ALEXANDER</td><td>96T</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;22</td><td>90</td><td>ANTREASYAN</td><td>90B</td><td>CBAL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Derived based in the reported $B^0$ result by assuming isospin symmetry: $\Gamma(B^0 \to \pi^- \ell^+ \nu^-) = 2\Gamma(B^+ \to \pi^0 \ell^+ \nu^-)$.

$$ \Gamma(\eta \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{27/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.35 &plusmn; 0.04</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.283 &plusmn; 0.055 &plusmn; 0.034</td><td>1 GEBAUER</td><td>22 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.42 &plusmn; 0.11 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>2 BELENO</td><td>17 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.38 &plusmn; 0.05 &plusmn; 0.05</td><td>3 LEES</td><td>12AA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.31 &plusmn; 0.06 &plusmn; 0.08</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>09Q BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.64 &plusmn; 0.20 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>08AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.36 &plusmn; 0.05 &plusmn; 0.04</td><td>3 DEL-AMO-SA..11F</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 12AA</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.01</td><td>90</td><td>5 ADAM</td><td>07 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.84 &plusmn; 0.31 &plusmn; 0.18</td><td>6 ATHAR</td><td>03 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by ADAM 07</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^+ B^-) = (51.3 \pm 0.6)\%$.

²Uses missing-mass technique by fully reconstructing the hadronic decay chain of the accompanying B.

³Uses loose neutrino reconstruction technique. Assumes $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^+ B^-) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^0 B^0) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

⁴Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁵The $B^0$ and $B^+$ results are combined assuming the isospin, B lifetimes, and relative charged/neutral B production at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁶ATHAR 03 reports systematic errors $0.16 \pm 0.09$, which are experimental systematic and systematic due to model dependence. We combine these in quadrature.

$$ \Gamma(\eta \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{28/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.24 &plusmn; 0.07</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.279 &plusmn; 0.129 &plusmn; 0.030</td><td>1 GEBAUER</td><td>22 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.24 &plusmn; 0.08 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12AA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.04 &plusmn; 0.22 &plusmn; 0.05</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>08AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.66 &plusmn; 0.80 &plusmn; 0.56</td><td>4 ADAM</td><td>07 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.72</td><td>90</td><td>5 BELENO</td><td>17 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.24 &plusmn; 0.08 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>2 DEL-AMO-SA..11F</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 12AA</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^+ B^-) = (51.3 \pm 0.6)\%$.

²Uses loose neutrino reconstruction technique. Assumes $B(Y(4S) \to B^+ B^-) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(Y(4S) \to B^0 B^0) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

³Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁴The $B^0$ and $B^+$ results are combined assuming the isospin, B lifetimes, and relative charged/neutral B production at the $\Upsilon(4S)$. Corresponds to 90% CL interval $(1.20-4.46) \times 10^{-4}$.

⁵Uses missing-mass technique by fully reconstructing the hadronic decay chain of the accompanying B.

$$ \Gamma(\omega \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{29/\Gamma} $$

$\ell = e$ or $\mu$, not sum over $e$ and $\mu$ modes.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>1.19 &plusmn; 0.09</b> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.21 &plusmn; 0.14 &plusmn; 0.08</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>13A BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.35 &plusmn; 0.21 &plusmn; 0.11</td><td>3 LEES</td><td>13T BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.07 &plusmn; 0.16 &plusmn; 0.07</td><td>4 SIBIDANOV</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.19 &plusmn; 0.16 &plusmn; 0.09</td><td>2,5 LEES</td><td>12AA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.3 &plusmn; 0.4 &plusmn; 0.4</td><td>6 SCHWANDA</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.14 &plusmn; 0.16 &plusmn; 0.08</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09Q BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13A</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.1</td><td>90</td><td>7 BEAN</td><td>93B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹LEES 13A reports $(1.21 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.08) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \omega \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0)]$ assuming $B(\omega(782) \to \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0) = (89.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$.

²Uses $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^+ B^-) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^0 B^0) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

³Uses semileptonic tagging. Assumes $B(\omega \to \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0) = (89.2 \pm 0.7)\%$ and that the production ratio of $B^+ B^-$ to $B^0 B^0$ from $\Upsilon(4S)$ is $1.056 \pm 0.028$. The partial branching fractions in three bins of $q^2$ are also reported.

⁴The signal events are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in the fully hadronic decays.

⁵Uses loose neutrino reconstruction technique.

<footnote n="2">²Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹The signal events are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in the fully hadronic decays.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Uses loose neutrino reconstruction technique. Assumes $B(Y(4S) \to B^+ B^-) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(Y(4S) \to B^0 B^0) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Using the isospin symmetry relation, $B^+$ and $B^0$ branching fractions are combined.</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴The signal events are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in the semileptonic mode $B \to D^*(\ell^-) \ell_\nu$.</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵$B^+$ and $B^0$ decays combined assuming isospin symmetry. Systematic errors include both experimental and form-factor uncertainties.</footnote>
# Meson Particle Listings

$B^{\pm}$

⁶Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁷BEAN 93B limit set using ISGW Model. Using isospin and the quark model to combine $\Gamma(\rho^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell)$ and $\Gamma(\rho^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)$ with this result, they obtain a limit <(1.6-2.7) × 10⁻⁴ at 90% CL for $B^+ \to \omega \ell^+ \nu_\ell$. The range corresponds to the ISGW, WSB, and KS models. An upper limit on $|V_{ub}/V_{cb}| < 0.8-0.13$ at 90% CL is derived as well.

$$ \Gamma(\omega\mu^+\nu_\mu)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

$\Gamma_{30}/\Gamma$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

seen

¹ ALBRECHT 91C ARG

¹In ALBRECHT 91C, one event is fully reconstructed providing evidence for the $b \to u$ transition.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$\ell = e$ or $\mu$, not sum over $e$ and $\mu$ modes.

$\Gamma_{31}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴)

CL%

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

1.58±0.11 OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)

1.42±0.23 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.4. See the ideogram below.

<table><tr><td>1.83±0.10±0.10</td></tr><tr><td>0.94±0.08±0.14</td></tr><tr><td>1.33±0.23±0.18</td></tr><tr><td>1.34±0.15<sup>+0.28</sup><sub>-0.32</sub></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1 SIBIDANOV</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2 DEL-AMO-SA...11C</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3 HOKUUE</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4 BEHRENS</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.16±0.11±0.30</td></tr><tr><td>1.40±0.21<sup>+0.32</sup><sub>-0.33</sub></td></tr><tr><td>1.2 ± 0.2<sup>+0.3</sup><sub>-0.4</sub></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.1</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2 AUBERT,B</td><td>050 BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11C</td></tr><tr><td>4 BEHRENS</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4 ALEXANDER</td><td>96T CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5 BEAN</td><td>93B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹The signal events are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in the fully hadronic decays.

²$B^+$ and $B^0$ decays combined assuming isospin symmetry. Systematic errors include both experimental and form-factor uncertainties.

³The signal events are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in the semileptonic mode $B \to D^(*) \ell \nu_\ell$.

⁴Derived based in the reported $B^0$ result by assuming isospin symmetry: $\Gamma(B^0 \to \rho^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell) = 2\Gamma(B^+ \to \rho^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \approx 2\Gamma(B^+ \to \omega \ell^+ \nu_\ell)$.

⁵BEAN 93B limit set using ISGW Model. Using isospin and the quark model to combine $\Gamma(\omega^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell)$ and $\Gamma(\rho^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)$ with this result, they obtain a limit <(1.6-2.7) × 10⁻⁴ at 90% CL for $B^+ \to \rho^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell$. The range corresponds to the ISGW, WSB, and KS models. An upper limit on $|V_{ub}/V_{cb}| < 0.8-0.13$ at 90% CL is derived as well.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.42±0.23 (Error scaled by 2.4)

<figure><img src="image_578.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+ \pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$\Gamma_{32}/\Gamma$

22.7<sup>+1.9</sup><sub>-1.6</sub>±3.5

BELENO

21 BELL

e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

$$ \Gamma(\rho\bar{\rho}\ell^+\nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$\Gamma_{33}/\Gamma$

5.8<sup>+2.4</sup><sub>-2.1</sub>±0.9

<table><tr><td>1 TIEN</td><td>14 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\bar{\rho}\mu^+\nu_\mu)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

CL%

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$\Gamma_{34}/\Gamma$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;8.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 TIEN</td><td>14 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\bar{\rho}\mu^+\nu_\mu)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^+) $$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

5.22±0.31±0.03

<table><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20k LHCB</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr></table>

$\Gamma_{34}/\Gamma_{295}$

¹AAIJ 20k reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \rho\bar{\rho}\mu^+\nu_\mu)/\Gamma(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+)] / [\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-)] = (8.75 \pm 0.39 \pm 0.35) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (5.961 \pm 0.033) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\bar{\rho}e^+\nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

CL%

<table><tr><td>1 TIEN</td><td>14 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

$\Gamma_{35}/\Gamma$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;5200</td><td>90</td><td>2 ADAM</td><td>03B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Based on phase-space model; if $V-A$ model is used, the 90% CL upper limit becomes $< 1.2 \times 10^{-3}$.

$$ \Gamma(e^+\nu_\ell)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

CL%

<table><tr><td>1 SATOYAMA</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

$\Gamma_{36}/\Gamma$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 3.5</td><td>90</td><td>2 YOOK</td><td>15 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>10E BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09V BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AD BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;15</td><td>90</td><td>ARTUSO</td><td>95 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Assumes $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^+B^-) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

$$ \Gamma(\mu^+\nu_\mu)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

CL%

<table><tr><td>1 PRIM</td><td>20 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

$\Gamma_{37}/\Gamma$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.29 to 1.07</td><td>90</td><td>2 SIBIDANOV</td><td>18 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.7</td><td>90</td><td>3 YOOK</td><td>15 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;11</td><td>90</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>10E BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.0</td><td>90</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>09V BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5.6</td><td>90</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>08AD BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.7</td><td>90</td><td>4,5 SATOYAMA</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 6.6</td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>040 BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09V</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;21</td><td>90</td><td>ARTUSO</td><td>95 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹This is a 90% C.L. upper limit in the frequentist approach. The corresponding upper limit in the Bayesian approach is < 8.9 × 10⁻⁷. A 2.8 standard deviation signal above the background is found, with a measured branching fraction (5.3 ± 2.0 ± 0.9) × 10⁻⁷.

²This is a 90% confidence interval in the frequentist approach. A 2.4 standard deviation signal above the background is found, with a measured branching fraction (6.46 ± 2.22 ± 1.60) × 10⁻⁷.

³Assumes $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^+B^-) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

⁴Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁵Superseded by SIBIDANOV 18.

$$ \Gamma(\tau^+\tau^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

See the note on "Decay Constants of Charged Pseudoscalar Mesons" in the $D_S^+$ Listings.

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴)

CL% DOCUMENT ID TECHN COMMENT

1.09±0.24 OUR AVERAGE

Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

<table><tr><td>1.25±0.28±0.27</td><td>1,2 KRONENBIT...</td><td>15 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.72<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.25</sub>±0.11</td><td>3 HARA</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.83<sup>+0.53</sup><sub>-0.49</sub>±0.24</td><td>2,4 LEES</td><td>13k BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.7 ± 0.8 ± 0.2</td><td>2,5 AUBERT</td><td>10E BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.54<sup>+0.38</sup><sub>-0.37</sub>±0.29</td><td>2,6 HARA</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>Repl. by KRONENBIT-TER 15</td></tr><tr><td>1.8 <sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-0.8</sub> ± 0.45</td><td>2,7 AUBERT</td><td>08D BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13k</td></tr><tr><td>0.9 ± 0.6 ± 0.1</td><td>2,5 AUBERT</td><td>07AL BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 10E</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.6</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>06K BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.79<sup>+0.56</sup><sub>-0.49</sub>±0.51</td><td>2,7 IKADO</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>Repl. by HARA 13</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 4.2</td><td>2 AUBERT,B</td><td>05B BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 06k</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 8.3</td><td>8 BARATE</td><td>01E ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 8.4</td><td>2 BROWDER</td><td>01 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5.7</td><td>9 ACCIARRI</td><td>97F L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;104</td><td>10 ALBRECHT</td><td>95D ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 22</td><td>ARTUSO</td><td>95 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 18</td><td>11 BUSKULIC</td><td>95 ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

¹Requires one reconstructed semileptonic B decay $B^- \to D^(*) \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell$ in the recoil.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³The authors combine their result with that from HARA 10 obtaining $B(B^- \to \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau) = (0.96 \pm 0.26) \times 10^{-4}$ and deriving $f_B |V_{ub}| = (7.4 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-4}$ GeV.
⁴ Requires a fully reconstructed hadronic B-decay in the recoil. Reports that this result combined with AUBERT 10E value gives $B(B^- \to \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau) = (1.79 \pm 0.48) \times 10^{-4}$.

⁵ Requires one reconstructed semileptonic B decay $B^- \to D^0 \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell X$ in the recoil.

⁶ Requires one reconstructed semileptonic B decay $B^- \to D^0 \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell X$ in the recoil.

⁷ The analysis is based on a sample of events with one fully reconstructed tag B in a hadronic decay mode $B^- \to D^0 \ell^- X^-$.

⁸ The energy-flow and b-tagging algorithms were used.

⁹ ACCIARRI 97F uses missing-energy technique and $f(b \to B^-) = (38.2 \pm 2.5)\%$.

¹⁰ ALBRECHT 95D uses full reconstruction of one B decay as tag.

¹¹ BUSKULIC 95 uses same missing-energy technique as in $D^- \to \tau^+ \nu_\tau X$, but analysis is restricted to endpoint region of missing-energy distribution.

$$ \Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_\ell \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{39/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 3.0 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 GELB</td><td>18</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 3.5 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2,3 HELLER</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;15.6 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09AT</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Supersedes HELLER 15.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³ Supersedes by GELB 18.

$$ \Gamma(e^+ \nu_e \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{40/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 4.3 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 GELB</td><td>18</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 6.1 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2,3 HELLER</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 17 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09AT</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;200 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>4 BROWDER</td><td>97</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Supersedes HELLER 15.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³ Supersedes by GELB 18.

⁴ BROWDER 97 uses the hermiticity of the CLEO II detector to reconstruct the neutrino energy and momentum.

$$ \Gamma(\mu^+ \nu_\mu \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{41/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 3.4 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 GELB</td><td>18</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 3.4 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2,3 HELLER</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;24 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2,4 AUBERT</td><td>09AT</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;52 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>5 BROWDER</td><td>97</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Supersedes HELLER 15.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³ Supersedes by GELB 18.

⁴ Note that the value given by AUBERT 09AT is $24 \times 10^{-6}$ in the paper abstract, and $26 \times 10^{-6}$ in the paper itself (Table I).

⁵ BROWDER 97 uses the hermiticity of the CLEO II detector to reconstruct the neutrino energy and momentum.

$$ \Gamma(\mu^+ \mu^- \nu_\mu \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{42/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6 &times; 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19P</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 19P limit established for the kinematic region where the lower of the two $M(\mu^+ \mu^-)$ is less than 980 MeV/c².

$$ \Gamma(D^0 X) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{43/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.086 &pm; 0.006 &pm; 0.004</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.098 &pm; 0.009 &pm; 0.006</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 X) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{44/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.786 &pm; 0.016 &pm; 0.034</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.793 &pm; 0.025 &pm; 0.045</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 X) / [\Gamma(D^0 X) + \Gamma(D^0 X)] \qquad \Gamma_{43/(\Gamma 43 + \Gamma 44)} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.098 &pm; 0.007 &pm; 0.001</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.110 &pm; 0.010 &pm; 0.003</td><td></td><td>AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D^+ X) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{45/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.025 &pm; 0.005 &pm; 0.002</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.038 &pm; 0.009 &pm; 0.005</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D^- X) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{46/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.099 &pm; 0.008 &pm; 0.009</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.098 &pm; 0.012 &pm; 0.014</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D^+ X) / [\Gamma(D^+ X) + \Gamma(D^- X)] \qquad \Gamma_{45/(\Gamma 45 + \Gamma 46)} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.204 &pm; 0.035 &pm; 0.001</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.278 &pm; 0.052 &pm; 0.009</td><td></td><td>AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ X) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{47/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.079 &pm; 0.006 &pm; 0.013</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.143 &pm; 0.016 &pm; 0.051</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr><tr><td>-0.034</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^- X) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{48/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.011 &pm; 0.004 &pm; 0.002</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.022</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ X) / [\Gamma(D_s^+ X) + \Gamma(D_s^- X)] \qquad \Gamma_{47/(\Gamma 47 + \Gamma 48)} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.884 &pm; 0.038 &pm; 0.002</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.966 &pm; 0.039 &pm; 0.012</td><td></td><td>AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^- X) / [\Gamma(D_s^+ X) + \Gamma(D_s^- X)] \qquad \Gamma_{48/(\Gamma 47 + \Gamma 48)} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.126</td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\lambda_c^+ X) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{49/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.021 &pm; 0.005 &pm; 0.008</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.029 &pm; 0.008 &pm; 0.011</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr><tr><td>-0.007</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\lambda}_c^- X) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{50/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.028 &pm; 0.005 &pm; 0.010</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.035 &pm; 0.008 &pm; 0.013</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr><tr><td>-0.009</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\lambda_c^+ X) / [\Gamma(\lambda_c^+ X) + \Gamma(\bar{\lambda}_c^- X)] \qquad \Gamma_{49/(\Gamma 49 + \Gamma 50)} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.427 &pm; 0.071 &pm; 0.001</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.452 &pm; 0.090 &pm; 0.003</td><td></td><td>AUBERT, BE</td><td>04B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07N</td></tr></tbody></table>