# Molecular Basis of Arabinobio-hydrolase Activity in Phytopathogenic Fungi CRYSTAL STRUCTURE AND CATALYTIC MECHANISM OF FUSARIUM GRAMINEARUM GH93 EXO-alpha-L-ARABINANASE

Raphaël Carapito, Anne Imberty, Jean Jeltsch, Simon Byrns, Pui Tam, Todd Lowary, Annabelle Varrot, Vincent Phalip

► To cite this version:

Raphaël Carapito, Anne Imberty, Jean Jeltsch, Simon Byrns, Pui Tam, et al.. Molecular Basis of Arabinobio-hydrolase Activity in Phytopathogenic Fungi CRYSTAL STRUCTURE AND CATALYTIC MECHANISM OF FUSARIUM GRAMINEARUM GH93 EXO-alpha-L-ARABINANASE. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2009, 284 (18), pp.12285-12296. 10.1074/jbc.M900439200. hal-03408197

HAL Id: hal-03408197

https://hal.science/hal-03408197

Submitted on 28 Oct 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Molecular Basis of Arabinobio-hydrolase Activity in Phytopathogenic Fungi

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE AND CATALYTIC MECHANISM OF FUSARIUM GRAMINEARUM GH93 EXO-α-L-ARABINANASE*

Received for publication, January 21, 2009, and in revised form, February 19, 2009 Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 6, 2009, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M900439200

Raphaël Carapito†, Anne Imberty§, Jean-Marc Jeltsch†, Simon C. Byrns¶, Pui-Hang Tam¶, Todd L. Lowary*, Annabelle Varrot§<fnref n="1" />, and Vincent Philip‡

From the ‡UMR 7175, Ecole Supérieure de Biotechnologie de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg-CNRS, Boulevard Sébastien Brandt, BP 10413, 67412 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France, the §Centre de Recherches sur les Macromolécules Végétales, CNRS (affiliated with Université Joseph Fourier and part of the Institut de Chimie Moléculaire de Grenoble), BP53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 09, France, and the ¶Alberta Ingenuity Centre for Carbohydrate Science and the Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, E5-52A Gunning-Lemieux Chemistry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G2, Canada

The phytopathogenic fungus *Fusarium graminearum* secretes a very diverse pool of glycoside hydrolases (GHs) aimed at degrading plant cell walls. α-L-Arabinanases are essential GHs participating in the complete hydrolysis of hemicellulose, a natural resource for various industrial processes, such as bio-ethanol or pharmaceuticals production. Arb93A, the exo-1,5-α-L-arabinanase of *F. graminearum* encoded by the gene *fg03054.1*, belongs to the GH93 family, for which no structural data exists. The enzyme is highly active (1065 units/mg) and displays a strict substrate specificity for linear α-1,5-L-arabinan. Biochemical assays and NMR experiments demonstrated that the enzyme releases α-1,5-L-arabinobiose from the nonreducing end of the polysaccharide. We determined the crystal structure of the native enzyme and its complex with α-1,5-L-arabinobiose, a degradation product of α-Me-1,5-L-arabinotetraose, at 1.85 and 2.05 Å resolution, respectively. Arb93A is a monomeric enzyme, which presents the six-bladed β-propeller fold characteristic of sialidases of clan GHE. The configuration of the bound arabinobiose is consistent with the retaining mechanism proposed for the GH93 family. Catalytic residues were proposed from the structural analysis, and site-directed mutagenesis was used to validate their role. They are significantly different from those observed for GHE sialidases.

The plant cell wall consists mainly of a complex aggregation of polysaccharides, such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin. Hemicellulose is one of the most abundant renewable biopolymers on earth and constitutes an important source of energy for the biofuel industry. It represents 20–40% of plant biomass and is principally composed of pentoses, such as xylose and arabinose (1). Due to the high complexity and structural variability of

this polysaccharide, many enzymes are necessary for its complete degradation (2). A number of microorganisms are able to break down hemicellulose, through the action of various glycoside hydrolases (GHs).<fnref n="2" /> The latter catalyze the cleavage of glycosidic bonds between sugars with either inversion or retention of the anomeric configuration (3). GHs have been classified into more than 114 different families based on their amino acid sequence similarity (CAZY (Carbohydrate Active Enzymes) server, available on the World Wide Web) (4, 5).

α-L-Arabinanases (EC 3.2.1.-) are accessory hemicellulases that hydrolyze α-L-arabinofuranosic linkages and act synergistically with other GHs to break down hemicellulose fully (6). These enzymes have become of interest in recent years because of their potential rate-limiting role in the degradation of lignocelluloses and their practical application in various industrial processes, such as the production of important medicinal compounds, the improvement of wine flavors, pulp treatment, juice clarification, the production of bioethanol, and the synthesis of oligosaccharides (7). According to the CAZY classification, α-L-arabinanases are present in six GH families (3, 43, 51, 54, 62, and 93) whose members display highly varying specificities. GH51 and GH54 are the most extensively characterized and contain mainly α-L-arabinofuranosidases, removing both α-1,2 and α-1,3 arabinofuranosyl moieties from arabinan and xylans (8–11). GH3 arabinofuranosidases are all bifunctional proteins acting on both β-1,4-xylose-xylose and β-1,3-xylose-arabinose bonds (12). GH62 enzymes have a specific arabinofuranose-debranching activity on xylan (13), whereas GH43 and GH93 proteins are known to hydrolyze α-1,5-linked arabinofuranose-oligosaccharides (14, 15). Nine three-dimensional structures of α-L-arabinanases belonging to the GH43, -51, and -54 families have been solved to date (8–11, 14, 16–19). Barley glucanases, which are members of GH3, have been structurally characterized (20), and those of GH62 are predicted to display the same five-bladed β-propeller fold (clan GHF) as the well documented GH43 family (14).

GH93 is described as a family of exo-1,5-α-L-arabinanases in the CAZY data base. This family contains only few sequences

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<footnote>* This work was supported by CNRS and the Université de Strasbourg.
The atomic coordinates and structure factors (codes 2w5n and 2w5o) have been
deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural
Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).</footnote>

<footnote>§ The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. 1 and 2.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ To whom correspondence should be addressed: CERMAV-CNRS, BP53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 09, France. Tel.: 33-476037634; Fax: 33-476547203; E-mail: Annabelle.Varrot@cermav.cnrs.fr.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² The abbreviations used are: GH, glycoside hydrolase; PACE, polysaccharide analysis using carbohydrate gel electrophoresis; DP, degree of polymerization; WT, wild type.</footnote>
Crystal Structure of GH93 α-L-Arabinanase

obtained from bacterial and fungal genome sequencing, and the
only characterized enzyme is Abnx, from Penicillium chrysogenum. Abxn cleaves arabinobiose from the nonreducing end of
linear arabinan (15, 21). The products of its transglycosylation
activity revealed net retention of the configuration of the anomeric carbon (22). GH93 is the only family of α-L-arabinanases
for which neither structural nor detailed mechanistic information has been reported to date.

Fusarium graminearum (teleomorph: Gibberella zeae) is a devastating pathogenic fungus that attacks various crop plants, such as maize, wheat, or barley. During the infection process, the fungus secretes a large and diverse panel of GHs that degrade the host cell wall. When F. graminearum grows in medium with plant cell wall material as the sole carbon source, as many as 11 CAZY families and 27 EC numbers are represented among the secreted enzymes (23). The diversity is particularly high for enzymes targeting hemicellulose, as recently shown by a transcriptional analysis revealing that 30 hemicellulase genes are transcribed in response to plant cell wall material (24). Two of these genes, *fg03054.1* (in the *F. graminearum* genome data base (25); GeneID: 2785867) and *fg03598.1* (GeneID: 2784780) are predicted to encode an exo-1,5-α-L-arabinanase of family GH93. Sequence alignment against protein structure sequences shows similarities with enzymes of clan GHE, which includes families GH33, -34, and -83. This clan is characterized by a six-bladed β-propeller fold and contains only sialidases/neuraminidases (EC 3.2.1.18) or trans-sialidases (EC 2.4.1.-). Sialidases, or neuraminidases, catalyze the removal of terminal sialic acid residues from various glycoconjugates and are involved in pathogenesis of many human diseases, including influenza and cholera (26).

Here we report the production, biochemical characterization, and structural analysis of Arb93A, the exo-1,5-α-L-arabinanase from *F. graminearum* encoded by the gene *fg03054.1*. We describe the structure of the native enzyme and its complex with α-1,5-L-arabinobiose, which to our knowledge are the first crystal structures of a GH93 enzyme. Our data reveal that the enzyme binds linear α-1,5-L-arabinan and releases α-1,5-L-arabinobiose from the nonreducing end with net retention of the anomeric configuration. The catalytic residues identified through inspection of the active site were tested by site-directed mutagenesis. We propose a functional mechanism for α-1,5-L-arabinan hydrolysis and compare Arb93A structure with that of enzymes of the clan GHE.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

*Substrates, Strains, and Media*—*p*-Nitrophenyl *α*-L-arabino-
furanoside was purchased from Sigma. Wheat arabinoxylan,
sugar beet arabinan, sugar beet debranched *α*-1,5-*L*-arabinan,
and *α*-1,5-*L*-arabino-oligosaccharides with degrees of polymer-
ization (DP) ranging from 1 to 6 were obtained from
Megazyme.

*F. graminearum* (*G. zeae*) was originally isolated from dis-
eased hops (*Humulus lupulus*) and identified by CABI Bio-
science. *F. graminearum* was cultured at 23 °C on M3 medium
(27) with hop cell wall as the sole carbon source at a concentra-
tion of 10 g/liter. The culture was performed as previously
described (23).

*Escherichia coli* strains TOP10, XL1-Blue, and BL21 (DE3)
(Invitrogen) were used for cloning procedures, site-directed
mutagenesis, and protein expression, respectively. *E. coli* were
grown in LB medium supplemented with 30 µg ml⁻¹
kanamycin.

RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and Cloning of arb93A—Total RNA was extracted from *F. graminearum* with the RNaqueous-4PCR kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was synthesized starting from the 3'-poly(A) of the mRNAs using the Smart cDNA synthesis kit (Clontech) and following the manufacturer's recommendations. The PCR products were directly used for amplification of *arb93A* with the primers 5'-ATCGGGTCTCCCATGAAGCC-TGCCCAGAAGG-3' and 5'-ATCGGGTCTCGAATTCTAA-GACTTCATAACCTCAG-3', incorporating BsaI restriction sites (underlined) for subsequent cloning. The amplification was carried out using iProof DNA polymerase (Bio-Rad). The resulting PCR product was purified on a Nucleospin device (Macherey-Nagel) and cloned into the pET30a+ plasmid (Novagen) previously digested with NcoI and EcoRI (Fermenstas) using standard molecular biology procedures. The resulting pET30a-*arb93A* plasmid harbored the gene cloned in frame with the coding sequence of an N-terminal 6× histidine tag.

*Site-directed Mutagenesis*—Mutants of Arb93A were generated using a PCR-based QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's instructions and using pET30a-*arb93A* as template. The following primer pairs were used to generate the mutated genes: 5'-CCTCACTCCTGTCTGGGCCCTTTTCCTGAT-GACCTAC-3' and 5'-GTAGGTCATCAGGAAAGGGCC-CAGACAGGAGTGAGG-3' for E170A; 5'-CAACGA-GTACATCTACGTCTATGCATATGGTGGTGGCCCTA-ACCC-3' and 5'-GGGTTAGGGCCACCACCATATGCAT-AGACGTAGATGTACTCGTTG-3' for E242A; 5'-GACGTT-CCTCAGCCAACTGCGGCCACCCGTTCTCTCCTCACT-TTC-3' and 5'-GAAAGTGAGGAGAGAACGGGTGGCCG-CAGTTGGCTGAGGAACGTC-3' for Y337A. The mutant DNA sequences were validated by sequencing.

*Production of Recombinant Arb93A and Mutants*—*E. coli* BL21 (DE3) cells transformed with pET30a+ containing the wild type (WT) or mutated *arb93A* gene were grown in 1 liter of LB-kanamycin, and protein expression was induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside at an A₆₀₀ nm of 0.6–0.8. Protein was produced for 16–18 h at 16 °C. A selenomethionine-substituted protein was produced according to the method of Doublie (28).

Cells were harvested by centrifugation and sonicated in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, and 25 mM imidazole. The lysate was subsequently centrifuged at 18,000 × g for 50 min and loaded onto a HisTrap HP 5-ml column (GE Healthcare) loaded with nickel sulfate and equilibrated in the aforementioned buffer. After washing with 100 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, and 50 mM imidazole, the protein was eluted with 15 ml of the same buffer supplemented with 500 mM imidazole. After a 3-fold dilution with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, the eluate was loaded onto a HiTrap Q-Sepharose Fast Flow 1-ml column (GE Healthcare) previously equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. The flow-through containing the protein of

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>
interest was then directly loaded onto a HiTrap SP-Sepharose Fast Flow 1-ml column (GE Healthcare) previously equilibrated in the same buffer. Following a washing step with 30 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 100 mM NaCl, the protein was eluted with 6 ml of the same buffer supplemented with 500 mM NaCl.

The N-terminal 6× histidine tag was cleaved overnight at room temperature with recombinant bovine enterokinase (Sigma) at 0.02 units/mg protein in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl₂, and 5% glycerol in a final volume of 13 ml. The reaction mix was diluted 2.5-fold with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, passed through a HisTrap HP 5-ml column to remove uncleaved protein, and loaded onto a HiTrap SP-Sepharose Fast Flow 1-ml column equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 100 mM NaCl. After washing with 20 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 100 mM NaCl, the protein was finally eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, and 5% glycerol in highly concentrated fractions that were directly used for crystallization experiments. The average production yield was 30 mg/liter. The purity was checked by SDS-PAGE. The selenomethionine-substituted protein was purified following the same protocol, except that all buffers were supplemented with 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol. Final elution was performed with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, and 10 mM dithiothreitol.

**Enzyme Activity Measurements**—Specific activities were measured using 6.5 µM Arb93A and 0.5 mM substrate in 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5, at 40 °C during 2 h. To determine the specificity of the enzyme, various substrates were tested. For *p*-nitrophenyl-α-L-arabinofuranoside, the rate of *p*-nitrophenol formed was determined by quantification at 410 nm using *p*-nitrophenol as the standard (extinction coefficient: $7 \times 10^3$ mM⁻¹ cm⁻¹) (29). For wheat arabinoxylan, sugar beet arabinan, and sugar beet debranched α-1,5-L-arabinan, the amount of reducing sugars released was determined with the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid method (30), using α-1,5-L-arabinobiose as a standard. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme releasing 1 µmol of α-1,5-L-arabinobiose equivalent/min.

For the determination of pH and temperature optima, the reactions were performed with sugar beet debranched α-1,5-L-arabinan as substrate, buffers ranging from pH 3 to 9 and temperatures ranging from 20 to 60 °C. The enzyme was incubated with the substrate in 50 mM sodium acetate for pH 3, 4, and 5; 50 mM sodium phosphate for pH 6, 7, and 8; and 50 mM Tris-HCl for pH 9.

**Synthesis of Methyl Oligoarabinosides**—The methyl-α-1,5-L-arabinotetraoside and methyl-α-1,5-L-arabinopentaoside used in NMR assays and crystallization trials were synthesized as described in the supplemental material, via protocols similar to those used for the preparation of other arabinofuranosides (31, 32).

**Kinetic Parameter Determination**—Kinetic measurements were performed with α-1,5-L-arabinan and α-1,5-L-arabino-oligosaccharides with DPs ranging from 1 to 6 as substrate. Typical reaction conditions were 6.5 µM enzyme in a final volume of 22 µl of sodium acetate, pH 5, with substrate concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 35 mM. After 4 min at 40 °C, the reactions were stopped by heating to 95 °C. Twenty µl were then used for

derivatization with 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (Molecular Probes) and analysis by polysaccharide analysis using carbohydrate gel electrophoresis (PACE), as described previously (33). After electrophoresis, the intensities of bands were quantified with the QuantityOne software (Bio-Rad). Measurements were performed in duplicate. Michaelis-Menten kinetic parameters were derived using nonlinear regression formulas of the Prism software (GraphPad).

**NMR Experiments**—Substrate and buffers were exchanged by lyophilization at least twice from D₂O. Exchange into deuterated buffer was performed for the enzyme by 10× dilutions and concentration on a Vivaspin 500 10 K (VivaSciences) three times.

¹H NMR spectra were acquired with a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer operating at a frequency of 400.13 MHz in 5-mm NMR tubes. Spectra were recorded with 4006 Hz spectral width, 32,768 data points, 4.089 s acquisition time, 0.1 s relaxation delay, and up to 16 scans. A substrate reference spectrum was acquired before adding the enzyme, and two experiments were performed. 30 µl of 500 mM sodium acetate, pH 4.5, and 2.5 mM NaCl and 70 µl of protein concentrated to 9 mg ml⁻¹ in 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 4.5, and 250 mM NaCl were added to 500 µl of methyl-α-1,5-L-arabinotetraoside to give a final concentration of 25.6 µM for the enzyme and 13.4 mM for the substrate. A spectrum was recorded after 5 min and then every 15 min for 3 h, and a final spectrum was recorded after 18 h at 25 °C. In the second experiment, 35 µl of enzyme concentrated to 7.8 mg ml⁻¹ in 50 mM Tris-DCI, pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl were added to 560 µl of methyl-α-1,5-L-arabinopentoside in the same buffer to give a final concentration of 11 µM for the enzyme and 11 mM for the substrate. A spectrum was recorded after 5 min and then every 5 min for 3 h and then every hour for 20 h at 20 °C. Integration was performed using the solvent peak (D₂O) as reference, and an integral of 1 was used for one proton.

**Crystallization, Data Collection, Structure Solution, and Refinement**—Crystals were obtained by the hanging drop vapor diffusion method using 2-µl drops containing a 50:50 (v/v) mix of reservoir solution combined with protein solution at 20 °C. Native crystals were obtained with a solution containing 10% polyethylene glycol 20000, 100 mM Tris, pH 8.5, and 100 mM MgCl₂, and the protein at 7.8 mg ml⁻¹. Selenomethionine crystals were obtained with a solution containing 25% polyethylene glycol 550MME, 100 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, and the protein at 11.6 mg ml⁻¹. The complex was obtained after soaking selenomethionine-substituted crystals, obtained in 22% polyethylene glycol 4000, 100 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, and 50 mM ammonium sulfate, for 2 h at room temperature with 1 mM α-Me-1,5-arabinotetraose. 20% glycerol was added as cryoprotectant when necessary prior to freezing in liquid nitrogen at 100 K.

Native, selenomethionine-substituted, and complex data were collected on a single crystal at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Grenoble, France) on ID14-1, ID29, and ID14-2 beamlines, respectively, using ADSC detectors. Data were processed using XDS (34) before being scaled and converted to structure factors using SCALA in the CCP4 suite program (35). All further computing was performed using the CCP4 suite unless otherwise stated. Statistics for data collections are shown in Table 1.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
# Crystal Structure of GH93 α-L-Arabinanase

<table><caption>**TABLE 1**
Data collection and refinement statistics</caption><thead><tr><th>Data set</th><th>Selenomethionine</th><th>Native</th><th>Selenomethionine/Arabinobiose</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Space group</td><td>P2<sub>1</sub>2<sub>1</sub>2<sub>1</sub></td><td>P2<sub>1</sub>2<sub>1</sub>2<sub>1</sub></td><td>P2<sub>1</sub>2<sub>1</sub>2<sub>1</sub></td></tr><tr><td>a, b, c (Å)</td><td>48.84, 92.83, 99.43</td><td>48.34, 90.49, 92.50</td><td>48.62, 86.88,108.17</td></tr><tr><td>Resolution (outer shell) (Å)<sup>a</sup></td><td>48.85-2.45 (2.58-2.45)</td><td>46.27-1.85 (1.95-1.85)</td><td>48.62-2.05 (2.16-2.05)</td></tr><tr><td>Measured/Unique reflections</td><td>219,533/17,270</td><td>122,420/35,097</td><td>109,746/29,532</td></tr><tr><td>Multiplicity</td><td>12.7 (13)</td><td>3.5 (3.2)</td><td>3.7 (3.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Completeness (%)</td><td>100 (100)</td><td>99.2 (96.3)</td><td>99.9 (99.8)</td></tr><tr><td>R<sub>merge</sub><sup>b</sup></td><td>0.116 (0.3972)</td><td>0.083 (0.394)</td><td>0.128 (0.427)</td></tr><tr><td>Mean I/σI</td><td>21.3 (7.7)</td><td>12.3 (2.9)</td><td>8.3 (2.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Wilson plot B</td><td>30</td><td>13.4</td><td>16.2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Refinement</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>R<sub>cryst</sub>/R<sub>free</sub><sup>c</sup></td><td></td><td>15/17.8</td><td>16.8/21.6</td></tr><tr><td>Root mean square deviation bonds (Å/degrees)</td><td></td><td>0.014/1.49</td><td>0.015/1.58</td></tr><tr><td>Protein atoms/B factor (Å<sup>2</sup>)</td><td></td><td>2916/12.25</td><td>2862/13.18</td></tr><tr><td>Ligand atoms/B factor (Å<sup>2</sup>)</td><td></td><td></td><td>19/17.9</td></tr><tr><td>Heteroatoms/B factor (Å<sup>2</sup>)</td><td></td><td>20/23.41</td><td>32/33.6</td></tr><tr><td>Water molecules/B factor (Å<sup>2</sup>)</td><td></td><td>415/23.87</td><td>318/25.3</td></tr><tr><td>Protein Data Bank code</td><td></td><td>2W5N</td><td>2W5O</td></tr></tbody></table>

<sup>a</sup> Values in parenthesis refer to the highest resolution shell.

<sup>b</sup> R<sub>merge</sub> = $\sum|I - \langle I \rangle|/\sum|I\rangle$.

<sup>c</sup> R<sub>cryst</sub> = $(\sum|F_o - F_c|)/(\sum|F_o|)$.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 1.** Effect of pH and temperature on the activity of Arb93A from F. graminearum. One unit of enzyme activity (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme releasing 1 µmol of α-1,5-L-arabinobiose equivalent/min.</figcaption></figure>

Initial phases and a first model for Arb93A were obtained by the single wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) method using the selenomethionine-substituted protein and autoSHARP (36). Five selenium positions were found and refined with a phasing power ANO of 0.877. Solvent flattening with an estimate of 48.2% solvent resulted in excellent and easily interpretable maps in which ARP/wARP could build a first model (37). This model was used to solve the structure of the native protein by molecular replacement using AMORE (38). The model was then updated with ARP/wARP. The complex structure was solved by molecular replacement using PHASER and the native coordinates as a search model (39).

The structures were refined using REFMAC (40) iterated with manual rebuilding in COOT (41). The incorporation of the ligand was performed after inspection of the $mF_o - DF_c$ weighted maps. Water molecules were introduced automatically using Coot and inspected manually. The stereochemical quality of the model was assessed with the program Procheck

<caption>**TABLE 2**
Substrate specificity of Arb93A measured at pH 5 and 40 °C</caption>

One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme releasing 1 µmol of α-1,5-L-arabinobiose equivalent min.

<table><caption>**TABLE 3**
Michaelis-Menten kinetic parameters of Arb93A measured on arabino-oligosaccharides with various DP5</caption><thead><tr><th>Substrate</th><th>Specific activity<br>units/mg</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>p-Nitrophenyl α-L-arabinofuranoside</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>Wheat arabinoxylan</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>Sugar beet arabinan</td><td>113 ± 45</td></tr><tr><td>Sugar beet debranched α-1,5-L-arabinan</td><td>1,065 ± 60</td></tr></tbody></table>

DP2, DP3, DP4, DP5, DP6, and DP > 100 correspond respectively to α-1,5-L-arabinobiose, α-1,5-L-arabinotriose, α-1,5-L-arabinotetraose, α-1,5-L-arabinopentaose, α-1,5-L-arabinohexaose, and debranched α-1,5-L-arabinan from sugar beet. Hydrolysis reactions were performed at pH 5 and 40 °C. ND, not determined.

<table><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Substrate</th><th>k<sub>cat</sub></th><th>k<sub>cat</sub>/K<sub>m</sub></th><th>K<sub>m</sub></th></tr><tr><th>s<sup>-1</sup></th><th>s<sup>-1</sup>/M<sup>-1</sup></th><th>M</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DP2</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>DP3</td><td>(1.13 ± 0.16) × 10<sup>5</sup></td><td>(3.17 ± 0.45) × 10<sup>7</sup></td><td>(3.56 ± 0.39) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>DP4</td><td>(1.05 ± 0.03) × 10<sup>5</sup></td><td>(1.13 ± 0.03) × 10<sup>7</sup></td><td>(9.26 ± 0.44) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>DP5</td><td>(0.81 ± 0.02) × 10<sup>5</sup></td><td>(2.05 ± 0.06) × 10<sup>7</sup></td><td>(3.96 ± 0.51) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>DP6</td><td>(0.94 ± 0.03) × 10<sup>5</sup></td><td>(4.66 ± 0.14) × 10<sup>7</sup></td><td>(2.03 ± 0.65) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>DP >100</td><td>ND</td><td>ND</td><td>(0.75 ± 0.05) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

(42) prior to deposition in the Protein Data bank under the codes 2W5N and 2W5O for the native and complex structures, respectively. Details of the model quality are given in Table 1. All figures were drawn with the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (DeLano Scientific, Palo Alto, CA) unless stated otherwise.

## RESULTS

**Cloning and Expression**—The arb93A coding sequence isolated from RNA of F. graminearum was 1,146 bp in length and corresponded to 381 amino acids. The protein was predicted to harbor an N-terminal signal peptide with a cleavage site between Ala¹⁶ and Lys¹⁷. Therefore, only the DNA encoding the mature protein of 366 amino acids was cloned in pET30a+ for production in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells. The apparent molecular mass after purification was ~40,000 Da, consistent with the theoretical value of 41,077 Da. A Blast search against sequences in the Protein Data Bank revealed that the closest

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>
Crystal Structure of GH93 α-L-Arabinanase

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 2. Kinetics analysis of the hydrolysis of methylated arabinooligosaccharides by Arb93A followed by ¹H NMR. A, hydrolysis of Me-α-1,5-L-arabinotetraoside. B, hydrolysis of Me-α-1,5-L-arabinopentaoside. Spectra were recorded at the indicated times. Labeling of the different anomeric protons of interest is indicated in the schematic representation of the reaction above the spectra.</figcaption></figure>

structurally characterized protein to Arb93A was the sialidase from *Micromonospora viridifaciens* (Protein Data Bank code 1EUS) with 20.9% sequence identity (43).

*Activity Assay and Substrate Specificity*—Enzymatic analysis at different pH and temperatures revealed an optimum activity at pH 5 and 40 °C. Fig. 1 summarizes the pH/temperature dependences of Arb93A. The protein is highly efficient in a large range of pH and temperature values; more than 80% of maximal activity is conserved at pH 4–6 and 30–50 °C.

To determine the substrate specificity, the activity of Arb93A was measured on four different substrates (Table 2). The protein is not active on *p*-nitrophenyl α-L-arabinofuranoside, indicating that more than one arabinofuranose moiety is necessary for cleavage. This was confirmed by PACE analysis of the hydrolysis products from oligoarabinofuranoside substrates with DPs 2–6, showing that the lowest DP of the released sugars was 2 (data not shown). Arb93A is probably not able to cleave arabinose or arabino-oligosaccharide substitutions of a xylan backbone, because no activity was detected on wheat arabinoxylan. Release of reducing sugars was observed with arabinan and debranched α-1,5-L-arabinan, revealing activities of 113 ± 45 and 1065 ± 60 units/ mg, respectively. Contrary to debranched α-1,5-L-arabinan, the α-1,5-linked backbone of L-arabinan is substituted by α-1,3-linked (and possibly some α-1,2-linked) L-arabinofuranosyl residues. The difference in activity may therefore be explained by the fact that only α-1,5-linkages are hydrolyzed by Arb93A. When digesting arabinan, only arabinobiose and arabinose are produced (data not shown), indicating that the enzyme degrades the substrate in an exo-type mode of action. Thus, Arb93A can be defined as an exo-1,5-α-L-arabinanase releasing α-1,5-L-arabinobiose (arabinose being a side product of arabinotri-

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>
Crystal Structure of GH93 α-L-Arabinanase

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 3. Schematic diagram of Arb93A fold. A, overall representation with numbering of the strands. B, interaction with a neighboring protein in the crystals displaying the binding of the N-terminal residues (B). Dotted lines, amino acids that could not be modeled in the electron density.</figcaption></figure>

ose degradation) similarly to its homologue Abxn from *P. chrysogenum* 31B (22).

*Enzyme Kinetics*—The kinetic parameters of Arb93A toward arabino-oligosaccharides with DPs 2–6 and debranched arabinan (DP > 100) were examined at pH 5 and 40 °C (Table 3). The *k*<sub>cat</sub> values are very similar for all of the substrates, varying between 0.81 × 10<sup>5</sup> and 1.13 × 10<sup>5</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>. Consequently, the observed differences of catalytic efficiencies (*k*<sub>cat</sub>/*K*<sub>m</sub>) are only due to the differences in affinity (*K*<sub>m</sub>). Except for DP4, the affinity of the enzyme for the substrates tends to increase with the length of the arabinofuranose-oligosaccharide chain. α-1,5-L-Arabinotetraose (DP4), for which the enzyme displays a *K*<sub>m</sub> of 9.26 ± 0.44 mM, is more resistant to hydrolysis than the other oligomers. There is no significant difference between the *K*<sub>m</sub> of Arb93A for DP3 and DP5. Comparison of the *k*<sub>cat</sub>/*K*<sub>m</sub> of the native Abnx purified from *P. chrysogenum* cultures with that of Arb93A shows that Arb93A activity is about 1000-fold stronger than Abnx activity on DP4/5/6 (44).

*NMR Experiments*—Product formation from the cleavage of Me-α-1,5-L-arabinotetraoside by Arb93A was followed in solution by NMR. Within a few minutes, peaks corresponding to arabinobiose (45) could be identified (Fig. 2A). The α/β ratio immediately stabilized at 1.6:1, indicating a very fast mutarotation equilibrium that appears to be particular to this furanose ring. It was therefore not possible to confirm the retention or inversion mechanism of the enzyme by this approach. Interestingly, the peaks corresponding to the methyl group disappeared after a few min, whereas a new peak with the chemical shift of methanol appeared at 3.39 ppm. At the end of the experiments, only arabinobiose and methanol were present in the solution. This demonstrated that the hydrolysis occurs by the nonreducing end and that an aglycon group can be cleaved from arabinobiose-derivative.

A second experiment with pentasaccharide substrate was performed at higher pH and lower temperature to slow down the enzyme reaction. As expected, only arabino-biose and α-Me-arabinoside were produced, confirming the requirement of an arabinobiose moiety for cleavage of the aglycon (Fig. 2B). With this substrate and reaction conditions, mutarotation was still too fast to evaluate the configuration of the anomeric carbon immediately after glycosidic bond cleavage. Trials to slow down the reaction and the mutarotation by lowering the temperature failed. Indeed, at temperatures below 20 °C, the solvent peak gets broader and covers an essential area of the spectra.

*Overall Crystal Structure*—The Arb93A crystal structure was solved by the SAD method using a selenomethionine protein derivative,

because molecular replacement trials with different sialidase models failed. The native structure described below was then determined and fully refined to 1.85 Å (Table 1). In the crystal as in solution, Arb93A is a monomeric protein constituted of a single catalytic domain of 366 amino acids (positions 16–381). One molecule is observed in the asymmetric unit, and all residues, apart from Gln<sup>20</sup> and Lys<sup>21</sup>, could be modeled in the electron density. The protein presents a six-bladed β-propeller fold where each blade is constituted of a four-stranded antiparallel sheet. The first β-strand participates in the formation of the last blade and closes the β-propeller by forming the “molecular Velcro” classically observed for this fold (46) (Fig. 3A). The N and C termini extend by some extra residues outside of the β-propeller. The C terminus forms a small α-helix. A five-amino acid coil at the N terminus is stabilized in the active site of a symmetry-related molecule (Fig. 3B).

As expected from sequence alignments, the search for structural relatives of Arb93A revealed extensive similarity with the sialidases/neuraminidases from clan GHE. The closest relatives, as determined by MSDFold (47), are sialidases of the family GH33, including the one from *M. viridifaciens* (PDB 1EUS) and the human enzyme Neu2 (1VCU), presenting root mean square deviation values of 2.42 and 2.15 Å for 280 and 285 aligned residues, respectively (43, 48). Arb93A also presents two Asp β-hairpin boxes similar to the ones of GH33 sialidases in the first and second blades (49). The role of this motif first identified in sialidases and later in structurally unrelated proteins remains unclear (50). They are located far from the active site and have been proposed to maintain the integrity of the β-propeller (43).

*Complex Structure*—Crystals of Arb93A crystal soaked with Me-α-1,5-L-arabinotetraoside diffracted to 2.05 Å. The complex structure solved by molecular replacement revealed unam-

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>Crystal Structure of GH93 α-L-Arabinanase</figcaption></figure>

FIGURE 4. Crystal structure of Arb93A complexed with α-1,5-L-arabinobiose. A, schematic overlay of the native (cyan/marine) and the disaccharide complex (green/yellow) Arb93A structures. B, ball and stick representation of the interactions between Arb93A amino acids and the α-1,5-L-arabinobiose (water molecules are displayed as magenta spheres). C, electrostatic surface representation of Arb93A active site and maximum likelihood weighted 2mF<sub>o</sub> - DF<sub>c</sub> electron density (contoured at 1 σ/0.38 electrons/Å<sup>3</sup>) for the α-1,5-L-arabinobiose complex in wall-eye stereo.

biguously the presence of an α-1,5-L-arabinobiose moiety in the
center of the propeller after inspection of the first electron den-
sity map. Only residues 22–381 could be modeled from the
electron density. Upon sugar binding, the five residues of the N
terminus have been displaced from the active site and are dis-
ordered. Small rigid body movement of about 1 Å is observed
for some surface loops around the active site (loops between
strands β11 and β12, β13 and β14, and β15 and β16) in order to
accommodate the sugar. The root mean square deviation
between the native and complex structure is 0.37 Å (Fig. 4A).

The active site is located in a deep acidic L-shaped crevice at
the center of the β-propeller (Fig. 4C). Two subsites are occu-
pied by arabinofuranose and were identified as -1 and -2.
Both arabinofuranoside moieties adopt an E₃ ring shape that
corresponds to a low energy conformation for this flexible ring
(51). The active site extends via a cleft that corresponds to the

+1 subsite. It extends further in a more open area where it is
difficult to clearly identify additional subsites. The -2 subsite is
rather deep and is surrounded by aromatic residues (Tyr⁴⁴,
Tyr⁶², Tyr¹⁰⁰, and Tyr³³⁷) and hydrophobic residues (Leu³⁵⁹
and Pro³⁶⁰). The O5 hydroxyl group is deeply buried, with no
possible extension of the oligosaccharide at the nonreducing
end. In the -1 subsite, no decoration can be tolerated, which
could explain the Arb93A preference for linear arabinan.

Sugar Contacts—In the −2 subsite, the O5 hydroxyl group
forms hydrogen bonds with Gln¹⁰¹ NE2, Glu⁶⁰ OE2, and, via
water molecules, Glu¹⁷⁰ OE2 and Tyr³³⁷ OH. The O4 ring oxy-
gen makes direct contact with Gln¹⁰¹ NE2, whereas interac-
tions of the O3 and O2 hydroxyl groups are mediated by water
molecules with the Tyr⁶² OH for the first and the Ala¹⁵⁹ main
chain oxygen and the Tyr¹⁰⁰ OH for the second. In the −1
subsite, the O5 glycosidic bond oxygen presents an indirect

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>
# Crystal Structure of GH93 α-L-Arabinanase

<table><caption>**TABLE 4**
List of contacts between arabinobiose and the protein</caption><thead><tr><th>Atom</th><th>-2 subsite</th><th>-1 subsite</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>O5</td><td>3.0 NE2 Gln<sup>101</sup><br>2.7 OE2 Glu<sup>60</sup><br>3.0 Wat-2.8 OE2 Glu<sup>170</sup><br>3.0 Wat-2.6 OH Tyr<sup>337</sup></td><td>3.0 Wat-3.0 OH Tyr<sup>337</sup><br>3.0 Wat-3.0 O4'</td></tr><tr><td>O4</td><td>3.0 NE2 Gln<sup>101</sup></td><td>3.0 OH Tyr<sup>337</sup></td></tr><tr><td>O3</td><td>2.8 Wat-2.7 OH Tyr<sup>62</sup></td><td>2.7 OE1 Gln<sup>195</sup><br>2.8 NH<sub>2</sub> Arg<sup>223</sup></td></tr><tr><td>O2</td><td>2.9 Wat-2.7 O Ala<sup>159</sup><br>2.9 Wat-2.8 OH Tyr<sup>100</sup></td><td>2.8 OE1 Glu<sup>170</sup><br>2.8 NE2 Gln<sup>195</sup></td></tr><tr><td>O1'</td><td></td><td>2.6 OE2 Glu<sup>242</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Stacking</td><td>Tyr<sup>100</sup></td><td>Trp<sup>169</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

hydrogen bond to the Tyr<sup>337</sup> OH. The O4 ring oxygen is hydrogen-bonded to the Tyr<sup>337</sup> OH, the O3 hydroxyl group is hydrogen-bonded to Gln<sup>195</sup> OE1 and Arg<sup>223</sup> NH<sub>2</sub>, the O2 hydroxyl group is hydrogen-bonded to Glu<sup>170</sup> OE1 and Gln<sup>195</sup> NE2, and finally the anomeric oxygen (O1) is hydrogen-bonded to Glu<sup>242</sup> OE2 (Fig. 4B). Stacking interactions have also been identified with Tyr<sup>100</sup> in the -2 subsite and Trp<sup>169</sup> in the -1 subsite as well as a strong hydrophobic interaction with Pro<sup>161</sup> at the level of the glycosidic bond (Table 4). The anomeric oxygen of the reducing ring does not carry a methyl group. The hydrolysis from the nonreducing end is therefore confirmed by structural evidence. The electron density is consistent with a 100% α-configuration, which supports the retention of the configuration of the anomeric carbon proposed for its homologue Abxn (22).

**Catalytic Mechanism and Mutant Analysis**—Two essential catalytic residues are required in the classical retention mechanism described by Koshland (3), an acid/base and a nucleophile. Examination of the amino acids close to the anomeric carbon revealed that two carboxylic residues, Glu<sup>242</sup> and Glu<sup>170</sup>, could act as the possible catalytic residues of family GH93. Glu<sup>170</sup> is located under the glycosidic C1 in a perfect position for nucleophilic attack. The position of Glu<sup>242</sup> is in accordance with a putative acid/base role and is hydrogen-bonded to the anomeric oxygen. The two carboxylate residues are 5.9 Å apart, which is in the range generally observed for other retaining enzymes (52).

Sialidases of the clan GHE use a tyrosine as the nucleophile, and structure overlay between Arb93A and these sialidases reveals that an equivalent tyrosine, Tyr<sup>337</sup>, is also present in the Arb93A active site. However, contrary to the sialidases, it is not in a proper position for nucleophilic attack. It is not located under the anomeric carbon but on the side and interacts with the ring oxygen. It could, however, play a role in catalysis that should be determined.

Each of the three hypothetical catalytic residues was mutated to alanine, and activities of the resulting mutants were compared with the wild-type Arb93A. Using linear α-1,5-L-arabinan as the substrate, Arb93A-E170A and Arb93A-E242A show no activity. Arb93A-Y337A displays a residual activity of only 7% compared with that of Arb93A-WT (data not shown). Fig. 5 displays PACE analysis of the digestion products of α-1,5-L-arabino-oligosaccharides by Arb93A and its mutants. α-1,5-L-Arabinobiose (DP2) is not hydrolyzed by any of the four tested proteins. As expected, no hydrolysis products of any tested arabinofuranose-oligosaccharides were observed with Arb93A-E170A and Arb93A-A242A. Arb93A-WT was active

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 5.** PACE analysis of hydrolysis products of Arb93A and its mutants on various arabino-oligosaccharides. DP2, DP3, DP4, and DP5 correspond to α-1,5-L-arabinobiose, α-1,5-L-arabinotriose, α-1,5-L-arabinotetraose, and α-1,5-L-arabinopentaose, respectively. cont-, the negative control, corresponding to reactions without enzyme. wt, E170A, E242A, and Y337A, the proteins Arb93A-WT, Arb93A-E170A, Arb93A-E242A, and Arb93A-Y337A, respectively. Hydrolysis reactions were performed at pH 5 and 40 °C.</figcaption></figure>

on arabinofuranose-oligosaccharides with DPs of 3, 4, and 5, whereas Arb93A-Y337A was only able to cleave polymers with DPs of 4 and 5.

Sequence alignment Arb93A with the other GH93 α-L-arabinanase from *F. graminearum* (Arb93B) and Abnx from *P. chrysogenum* (21) and Ara1 from *Fusarium oxyporum* shows that the three residues are conserved in those enzymes (Fig. 6A). Those results support a role of Glu<sup>170</sup> and Glu<sup>242</sup> in the catalytic mechanism, whereas the role of Tyr<sup>337</sup> during the catalysis remains unclear. We propose, therefore, a classical retaining mechanism for family GH93, with Glu<sup>242</sup> functioning as an acid/base and Glu<sup>170</sup> as a nucleophile, as depicted in Fig. 6B.

## DISCUSSION

According to the CAZY classification, GHs are distributed in 114 families based on their primary sequence (available on the World Wide Web). For about 30 of them, no three-dimensional structure has been solved to date. Crystal structures of native GHs and their complex with substrates generally provide information about the detailed mechanism, transition states, and specificity. We report here the first structure of a GH93 enzyme: an α-1,5-L-arabinanase from the fungus *F. graminearum*.

**Structural Similarities with Clan GHE**—According to its six-bladed β-propeller fold, Arb93A should be included into clan

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>
Crystal Structure of GH93 α-L-Arabinanase

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 6. Proposed catalytic mechanism of Arb93A. A, sequence alignment of Arb93A with the second GH93 arabinanase of *F. graminearum* (Arb93B), Abnx from *P. chrysogenum* and Ara1 from *F. oxyporum* (figure drawn with ESPript (60)). B, schematic representation of the proposed Arb93A mechanism.</figcaption></figure>

GHE. Until now, this clan consisted of only the sialidase super-family, which comprises family 33 with most bacterial and eukaryotic sialidases and transialidases, and families 34 and 83, which contain viral sialidases and hemagglutinin-neuraminidases, respectively.

The comparison of the Arb93A structure with its closest related sequence, the family 33 sialidase from *M. viridifaciensis* (43), is displayed in Fig. 7 and could be extended to other sialidases. Apart from the same canonical six-bladed β-propeller

fold, Arb93A presents major differences compared with *M. viridifaciensis* sialidase. One of them is that Arb93A lacks a carbohydrate binding module. Although carbohydrate binding modules have been proposed to play a role in the increase of the catalytic efficiency (53), the $k_{cat}/K_m$ value of the sialidase using p-nitrophenyl α-D-sialoside as substrate is of the same order of magnitude as the values of Arb93A on the different arabino-oligosaccharides (54). For both of these exoenzymes, the active site is located in an acidic crevice at the center of the β-propel-

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /></figure>
Crystal Structure of GH93 α-L-Arabinanase

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 7. Comparison of the three-dimensional structures of GH93 and GH33 glycoside hydrolases. A, schematic diagram of the overlay of Arb93A (green/forest) with the GH33 sialidase of *M. viridifaciensis* (yellow/wheat). B, ball and stick representation of the superposition of the two enzymes active site.</figcaption></figure>

ler. The Arb93A active site is more extended, since it cleaves off a disaccharide, whereas sialidases cleave only one terminal sialic acid. The active site is also more buried in Arb93A. The part of the active site pocket of sialidases that interacts with the carboxylic group of sialic acid is highly basic, which is not observed in Arb93A as would be expected due to the absence of a charged substituent in its substrate.

*Active Site and Mechanism*—NMR and structural data demonstrate that Arb93A cleaves the nonreducing arabinobiose from linear α-1,5-L-arabinans. From the complex crystal structure, the nonreducing extremity of the disaccharide is enclosed and could not be extended because the hydroxyl group at C5 oxygen is the most buried functionality. In contrast, a polysaccharide substrate can be accommodated from the reducing end glycosidic oxygen of the disaccharide, although with an ~90° kink in the orientation of the chain. The active site is indeed much more open after the +1 subsite at the reducing end. There is no evidence for a +2 subsite yet, but there is a slightly basic platform where carbohydrate could be accommodated (Fig. 4B).

The present work indicates that arabinanases of the GH93 family act with retention of configuration, a mechanism that is also observed in related sialidases. Moreover, it corroborates the results obtained for Abnx, where retention of configuration was observed in the products of its transglycosylation activity (22). Nevertheless, and in contrast to expectations, the enzymes of family 93 present a catalytic machinery that is different from the sialidases (55). Structural evidence and mutation data clearly indicate that Arb93A acts through a classical retaining mechanism involving two conserved carboxylate residues, Glu<sup>170</sup> and Glu<sup>242</sup>, acting as nucleophile and acid/base, respectively (Figs. 6 and 7). The enzyme could also be classified as a antiprotonator, such as those of the GHA clan (56). Sialidases, on the other hand, use a tyrosine residue as the nucleophile (reviewed in Ref. 55). It is the only residue among the eight that are conserved in sialidases that is also present in members of family 93. Tyr<sup>337</sup>, the equivalent tyrosine in Arb93A, is, however, not positioned properly for nucleophilic attack. This seems to be a result of the different shape of the active site, which is much more extended in Arb93A. The -1 subsite of

sialidases is located at the level of the -2 subsite of Arb93A (Fig. 7B). The anomeric carbon in Arb93A is more than 5 Å away from the position observed in sialidases. This locates Tyr<sup>337</sup> on the side of the anomeric carbon and not underneath as expected for a nucleophile. The differences in the nature of the catalytic residues and machinery have probably evolved in response to the unique properties of the different substrates (57).

*Role of Tyr*<sup>337</sup>—The mutation of Tyr<sup>337</sup> to alanine results in a reduction of activity of 93%, which clearly indicates that this conserved residue is important for activity but not

critical. One postulated role is that this residue may facilitates the attack by the nucleophile, as observed for other enzymes of the clan GHA, such as cellulases from family 5 or xylanases of family 11 (58, 59). It could help to maintain the ionization state of the nucleophile in the charged state when the structure is unliganded. The tyrosine is, however, 4 Å from the nucleophile in the present structure, but small movements of the side chain could be envisaged during catalysis. Alternatively, this residue could have a role in the stabilization of the substrate in the binding pocket. The Arb93A-Y337A mutant is indeed weakly active on the tetrasaccharide and longer oligosaccharides, but it cannot hydrolyze a trisaccharide. From the active site shape, upon binding, there should be a strong kink between the -1 and +1 subsites introduced by Tyr<sup>337</sup> and Leu<sup>359</sup> (Fig. 4C). The tyrosine interacts with the ring oxygen in the -1 subsite and will probably interact with arabinofuranose in the +1 subsite, stabilizing the sugar before cleavage. In the mutant, the trisaccharide would not be correctly bound, whereas for higher oligosaccharides, additional contacts would compensate in part for the absence of tyrosine. Similarly, in the arabinanase Arb43A from *Cellvibrio japonicus*, an aromatic residue, Phe<sup>114</sup>, influences the substrate conformation in the active site, and its mutation to alanine leads to a low enzymatic activity (14).

*Comparison with Sequence-related Arabinanases*—It has been demonstrated that *F. graminearum* expresses two homologous GH93 α-L-arabinanases displaying 52.9% sequence identity (Fig. 6A).<fnref n="3" /> The reason for the occurrence of two enzymes predicted to catalyze the same reaction is unclear. These two proteins may possibly display slightly divergent substrate specificities, allowing a better adaptation of the fungus to its substrate.

Arb93A displays strict substrate specificity for debranched α-1,5-L-arabino-oligosaccharides with DPs of >2 and cleaves only α-1,5-L-arabinobiose from the backbone. The reducing terminal arabinosyl residue of the commercial arabinan and debranched α-1,5-L-arabinan used for activity measurements is attached through rhamnose to fragments of a rham-

<footnote n="3">³ R. Carapito, J.-M. Jeltsch, and V. Phalip, unpublished data.</footnote>
nogalacturonan backbone. The observed hydrolysis through
the nonreducing end of the molecule is therefore compatible
with hydrolysis of such branches. Similar characteristics
were observed for Abnx of *P. chrysogenum* sharing 53.2%
sequence identity with Arb93A (15, 22). Enzymes from the
GH93 family present the same catalytic machinery, and their
mode of action seems quite specific to this family with the
release of arabinobiose.

This study provides the first step in the understanding of
the catalytic mechanism for the GH93 enzymes. Further
experiments with mutants and/or inhibitors will help to con-
firm the retention mechanism, to determine the require-
ments both at the enzyme and substrate levels and permit the
identification of additional subsites. The understanding of
the structural and mechanistic features of the GH93
enzymes as well as the properties of their substrates, is
indeed of great importance at the industrial levels. It will
help in the comprehension of the degradation mechanisms
of the highly diverse polysaccharidic substrates present in
nature. Arb93A represents a new step toward the establish-
ment of a defined collection of industrially applicable GHs,
which is of primary interest for a better utilization of renew-
able natural hemicellulosic resources.

Acknowledgments—We are very grateful to Cophoudal (France) for supplying the raw hop material. We thank the ESRF (Grenoble, France) for access to synchrotron data collection facilities and Isabelle Jeacomine for help during NMR experiments.

REFERENCES

1. Saha, B. C. (2003) *J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.* **30**, 279–291

2. Ward, O. P., and Moo-Young, M. (1989) *Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.* **8**, 237–274

3. Koshland, D. E. (1953) *Biol. Rev.* **28**, 416–436

4. Henrissat, B. (1998) *Biochem. Soc. Transact.* **26**, 153–156

5. Cantarel, B. L., Coutinho, P. M., Rancurel, C., Bernard, T., Lombard, V., and Henrissat, B. (2009) *Nucleic Acids Res.* **37**, D233–D238

6. Margolles-Clark, E., Tenkanen, M., Nakari-Setala, T., and Penttila, M. (1996) *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **62**, 3840–3846

7. Numan, M. T., and Bhosle, N. B. (2006) *J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.* **33**, 247–260

8. Hovel, K., Shallom, D., Niefind, K., Belakhov, V., Shoham, G., Baasov, T., Shoham, Y., and Schomburg, D. (2003) *EMBO J.* **22**, 4922–4932

9. Miyanaga, A., Koseki, T., Matsuzawa, H., Wakagi, T., Shoun, H., and Fushinobu, S. (2004) *J. Biol. Chem.* **279**, 44907–44914

10. Paes, G., Skov, L. K., O'Donohue, M. J., Remond, C., Kastrup, J. S., Gajhede, M., and Mirza, O. (2008) *Biochemistry* **47**, 7441–7451

11. Taylor, E. J., Smith, N. L., Turkenburg, J. P., D'Souza, S., Gilbert, H. J., and Davies, G. J. (2006) *Biochem. J.* **395**, 31–37

12. Mai, V., Wiegel, J., and Lorenz, W. W. (2000) *Gene* (Amst.) **247**, 137–143

13. Gielkens, M. M., Visser, J., and de Graaff, L. H. (1997) *Curr. Genet.* **31**, 22–29

14. Nurizzo, D., Turkenburg, J. P., Charnock, S. J., Roberts, S. M., Dodson, E. J., McKie, V. A., Taylor, E. J., Gilbert, H. J., and Davies, G. J. (2002) *Nat. Struct. Biol.* **9**, 665–668

15. Sakamoto, T., and Thibault, J. F. (2001) *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **67**, 3319–3321

16. Brunzelle, J. S., Jordan, D. B., McCaslin, D. R., Olczak, A., and Wawrzak, Z. (2008) *Arch. Biochem. Biophys.* **474**, 157–166

17. Proctor, M. R., Taylor, E. J., Nurizzo, D., Turkenburg, J. P., Lloyd, R. M., Vardakou, M., Davies, G. J., and Gilbert, H. J. (2005) *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.* **102**, 2697–2702

18. Vandermarliere, E., Bourgois, T. M., Winn, M. D., Van Campenhout, S., Volckaert, G., Delcour, J. A., Strelkov, S. V., Rabijns, A., and Courtin, C. M.

(2009) *Biochem. J.* **418**, 39–47

19. Yamaguchi, A., Tada, T., Wada, K., Nakaniwa, T., Kitatani, T., Sogabe, Y., Takao, M., Sakai, T., and Nishimura, K. (2005) *J. Biochem. (Tokyo)* **137**, 587–592

20. Varghese, J. N., Hrmova, M., and Fincher, G. B. (1999) *Structure* **7**, 179–190

21. Sakamoto, T., Ihara, H., Shibano, A., Kasai, N., Inui, H., and Kawasaki, H. (2004) *FEBS Lett.* **560**, 199–204

22. Sakamoto, T., Fujita, T., and Kawasaki, H. (2004) *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* **1674**, 85–90

23. Phalip, V., Delalande, F., Carapito, C., Goubet, F., Hatsch, D., Leize-Wagner, E., Dupree, P., Dorsselaer, A. V., and Jeltsch, J. M. (2005) *Curr. Genet.* **48**, 366–379

24. Hatsch, D., Phalip, V., Petkovski, E., and Jeltsch, J. M. (2006) *Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.* **345**, 959–966

25. Guldener, U., Mannhaupt, G., Munsterkotter, M., Haase, D., Oesterheld, M., Stumpflen, V., Mewes, H. W., and Adam, G. (2006) *Nucleic Acids Res.* **34**, D456–458

26. Corfield, T. (1992) *Glycobiology* **2**, 509–521

27. Mitchell, D. B., Vogel, K., Weimann, B. J., Pasamontes, L., and van Loon, A. P. (1997) *Microbiology* **143**, 245–252

28. Doublie, S. (1997) *Methods Enzymol.* **276**, 523–530

29. Lee, R. C., Hrmova, M., Burton, R. A., Lahnstein, J., and Fincher, G. B. (2003) *J. Biol. Chem.* **278**, 5377–5387

30. Miller, G. L. (1959) *Anal. Chem.* **31**, 426–428

31. Joe, M., Bai, Y., Nacario, R. C., and Lowary, T. L. (2007) *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **129**, 9885–9901

32. Yin, H., D'Souza, F. W., and Lowary, T. L. (2002) *J. Org. Chem.* **67**, 892–903

33. Carapito, R., Carapito, C., Jeltsch, J. M., and Phalip, V. (2009) *Bioresourc Technol.* **100**, 845–850

34. Kabsch, W. (1993) *J. Appl. Crystallogr.* **26**, 795–800

35. Collaborative Computational Project 4 (1994) *Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.* **50**, 760–763

36. Vonrhein, C., Blanc, E., Roversi, P., and Bricogne, G. (2006) *Methods Mol. Biol.* **364**, 215–230

37. Perrakis, A., Morris, R., and Lamzin, V. S. (1999) *Nat. Struct. Biol.* **6**, 458–463

38. Navaza, J., and Saludjian, P. (1997) *Methods Enzymol.* **276**, 581–594

39. McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Storoni, L. C., and Read, R. J. (2005) *Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.* **61**, 458–464

40. Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A., and Dodson, E. J. (1997) *Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.* **53**, 240–255

41. Emsley, P., and Cowtan, K. (2004) *Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr.* **60**, 2126–2132

42. Laskowski, R. A., Macarthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thornton, J. M. (1993) *J. Appl. Crystallogr.* **26**, 283–291

43. Gaskell, A., Crennell, S., and Taylor, G. (1995) *Structure* **3**, 1197–1205

44. Sakamoto, T. (2006) *J. Appl. Glycosci.* **53**, 115–122

45. Cros, S., Imberty, A., Bouchemal, N., Du Penhoat, C. H., and Perez, S. (1994) *Biopolymers* **34**, 1433–1447

46. Jawad, Z., and Paoli, M. (2002) *Structure* **10**, 447–454

47. Krissinel, E., and Henrick, K. (2004) *Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr.* **60**, 2256–2268

48. Chavas, L. M. G., Tringali, C., Fusi, P., Venerando, B., Tettamanti, G., Kato, R., Monti, E., and Wakatsuki, S. (2005) *J. Biol. Chem.* **280**, 469–475

49. Roggentin, P., Rothe, B., Kaper, J. B., Galen, J., Lawrisuk, L., Vimr, E. R., and Schauer, R. (1989) *Glycoconj. J.* **6**, 349–353

50. Copley, R. R., Russell, R. B., and Ponting, C. P. (2001) *Protein Sci.* **10**, 285–292

51. Cros, S., du Penhoat, C. H., Pérez, S., and Imberty, A. (1993) *Carbohydrate Res.* **248**, 81–93

52. McCarter, J. D., and Withers, S. G. (1994) *Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.* **4**, 885–892

53. Thobhani, S., Ember, B., Siriwardena, A., and Boons, G. J. (2003) *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **125**, 7154–7155

54. Narine, A. A., Watson, J. N., and Bennet, A. J. (2006) *Biochemistry* **45**, 9319–9326

55. Vocadlo, D. J., and Davies, G. J. (2008) *Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.* **12**,

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /></figure>
Crystal Structure of GH93 α-L-Arabinanase

539–555

56. Heightman, T. D., and Vasella, A. T. (1999) *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.* **38**, 750–770

57. Amaya, M. F., Watts, A. G., Damager, I., Wehenkel, A., Nguyen, T., Buschiazzo, A., Paris, G., Frasch, A. C., Withers, S. G., and Alzari, P. M. (2004) *Structure* **12**, 775–784

58. Sabini, E., Sulzenbacher, G., Dauter, M., Dauter, Z., Jorgensen, P. L., Schlein, M., Dupont, C., Davies, G. J., and Wilson, K. S. (1999) *Chem. Biol.* **6**, 483–492

59. Varrot, A., Schulein, M., and Davies, G. J. (2000) *J. Mol. Biol.* **297**, 819–828

60. Gouet, P., Courcelle, E., Stuart, D. I., and Metoz, F. (1999) *Bioinformatics* **15**, 305–308