<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

HAL
open science

# PCI Code of Conduct

Thomas Guillemaud, Denis Bourguet, Marjolaine Hamelin

► To cite this version:

Thomas Guillemaud, Denis Bourguet, Marjolaine Hamelin. PCI Code of Conduct. 2022. hal-04727581

HAL Id: hal-04727581

https://hal.science/hal-04727581v1

Submitted on 9 Oct 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# PCI Code of Conduct

Authors, recommenders and reviewers for Peer Community in (PCI) must agree to comply with the following rules:

1. Recommenders for PCI and reviewers should have no financial conflict of interest (see a definition below) relating to the articles they evaluate.

2. Authors should have no financial conflict of interest (see a definition below) relating to the articles they submit to PCI. Submitted preprints must therefore contain a section indicating that "The authors of this article declare that they have no financial conflict of interest with the content of this article." If authors are unsure whether their article may be associated with financial conflicts of interest, they can send an Email to contact@peercommunityin.org to ask for clarification.

3. Authors should have as little non-financial conflict of interest (see a definition below) as possible relating to the articles they submit to PCI, although a complete absence of conflict of interest may be difficult to achieve due to the scientific interest in the subject. Such conflicts of interest must be declared by the authors in the "Conflict of interest" section of their submitted article.

4. Recommenders for PCI and reviewers should have as little non-financial conflict of interest (see a definition below) as possible relating to the articles they evaluate, although a complete absence of conflict of interest may be difficult to achieve due to the scientific interest in the subject required. For instance, recommenders for PCI and reviewers should not evaluate articles written by close colleagues and coworkers (in general, are considered "close colleagues and coworkers" people belonging to the same team in the last four years, people with whom they have had recurrent contacts to co-publish articles in the last four years, to receive joint funding in the last four years), written by authors with whom they are in scientific competition or with whom they have conflicting relationships, or written by authors whom they know evaluated - as recommender or reviewer - one or more of their own articles in the last four years, or written by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of their recommendation.

5. Reviews and recommendations should be of high quality. Reviews should be sufficiently deep and detailed for the PCI recommender handling the recommendation process to gain a full appreciation of the qualities, defects and limitations of the article. Texts (reviews, recommendations, comments, messages to authors) will be returned to PCI recommenders and reviewers if they do not respect these rules.

6. Authors, recommenders for PCI and reviewers must ensure that the data for recommended articles are available to readers, through deposition in an open data repository, such as Zenodo, Dryad or institutional repositories, for example. Deposited data must have a digital object identifier (DOI). Authors, recommenders and reviewers must also check that details of the quantitative analyses (e.g. data treatment and statistical scripts in R, bioinformatic pipelines scripts, etc.) in the recommended articles are available to the readers, as appendices or supplementary online materials (in this case, the supplementary material must have a digital object identifier (DOI)), for example.

## What is a conflict of interest?

* A financial interest occurs when the authors, recommenders or reviewers: -Receive (or have received in the past four years) salaries, reimbursements, fees, fellowship, grants, or funding from an entity with financial interests that may be affected by the results of the research presented in the article, -have shares or
stocks in an entity with economic interests that may be affected by the results of
the research presented in the article or-hold patents linked to the research
presented in the article

* Non-financial conflicts of interests include political, personal, religious, ideological, academic, and intellectual interests of the authors, recommenders or reviewers that may be affected by the results of the research presented in the article.

## Misconducts

* The Managing Board of each thematic PCI has the right to exclude recommenders from the PCI if they do not respect these rules.

* The thematic PCIs will follow the recommendations of COPE (the Committee on Publication Ethics) in the event of misconduct. When the managing board of a thematic PCI has knowledge of potential misconduct regarding a paper recommended by this PCI, it will ask an ad hoc committee of editors to investigate the case. The ad hoc committee will advise the Managing Board of the thematic PCI, and based on COPE's recommendations, the Managing Board will decide on what action to take.

Recommendations may be retracted by thematic PCIs. Journals in which such articles have been eventually published based on the recommendation by thematic PCIs will be alerted.