# Involvement of gap junction channels in the pathophysiology of migraine with aura

Denis Sarrouilhe, Catherine Dejean, Marc Mesnil

► To cite this version:

Denis Sarrouilhe, Catherine Dejean, Marc Mesnil. Involvement of gap junction channels in the pathophysiology of migraine with aura. Frontiers in Physiology, 2014, 5, pp.78. 10.3389/fphys.2014.00078. hal-04432544

HAL Id: hal-04432544

https://univ-poitiers.hal.science/hal-04432544v1

Submitted on 1 Feb 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Involvement of gap junction channels in the pathophysiology of migraine with aura

Denis Sarrouilhe<fnref n="1" />*, Catherine Dejean<fnref n="2" /> and Marc Mesnil<fnref n="3" />

**Edited by:**

Georg Zoidl, York University, Canada

**Reviewed by:**

Nora Prochnow, Ruhr-Universität
Bochum, Germany

Rebecca Lam, Max Planck Institute
of Biophysics, Germany

**\*Correspondence:**

Denis Sarrouilhe, Laboratoire de
Physiologie Humaine, Faculté de
Médecine et Pharmacie, Université
de Poitiers, 6 rue de La Milétrie, Bât
D1, TSA 51115, 86073 Poitiers

Cedex 9, France

e-mail: denis.sarrouilhe@
univ-poitiers.fr

Migraine is a common, recurrent, and disabling primary headache disorder with a genetic component which affects up to 20% of the population. One third of all patients with migraine experiences aura, a focal neurological disturbance that manifests itself as visual, sensitive or motor symptoms preceding the headache. In the pathophysiology of migraine with aura, activation of the trigeminovascular system from the meningeal vessels mediates migraine pain via the brainstem and projections ascend to the thalamus and cortex. Cortical spreading depression (CSD) was proposed to trigger migraine aura and to activate perivascular trigeminal nerves in the cortex. Quinine, quinidine and the derivative mefloquine are able to inhibit CSD suggesting an involvement of neuronal connexin36 channels in CSD propagation. More recently, CSD was shown to induce headache by activating the trigeminovascular system through the opening of stressed neuronal Pannexin1 channels. A novel benzopyran compound, tonabersat, was selected for clinical trial on the basis of its inhibitory activity on CSD and neurogenic inflammation in animal models of migraine. Interestingly, in the time course of animal model trials, tonabersat was shown to inhibit trigeminal ganglion (TGG) neuronal-glial cell gap junctions, suggesting that this compound could prevent peripheral sensitization within the ganglion. Three clinical trials aimed at investigating the effectiveness of tonabersat as a preventive drug were negative, and conflicting results were obtained in other trials concerning its ability to relieve attacks. In contrast, in another clinical trial, tonabersat showed a preventive effect on attacks of migraine with aura but had no efficacy on non-aura attacks. Gap junction channels seem to be involved in several ways in the pathophysiology of migraine with aura and emerge as a new promising putative target in treatment of this disorder.

**Keywords:** aura, connexin, cortical spreading depression, gap junction, pannexin, tonabersat, trigeminovascular

## INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a common, recurrent, and disabling primary headache disorder which affects up to 20% of the population (Haut et al., 2006). The estimated annual prevalence of migraine is 18.2% in women and 6.5% in men in the population of the United States, and 16.8 and 7.5%, respectively, in European countries (Lipton et al., 2001; Stovner et al., 2006). Migraine prevalence varies with age and is highest in 35- to 45-year-old people. Migraine is associated with significant reduction of health-related quality of life and has an important socioeconomic impact. Migraineurs report functional impairment with their headaches: bed rest, absenteeism from work or school, reduced effectiveness, disruption of household work, family or social activity. On the basis of clinical and descriptive criteria, and headache features, the second edition of the Classification of Headache Disorders divided migraine into five major categories, the two most important of these are migraine without aura and migraine with aura. About one third of all patients with migraine experiences aura, a focal neurological disturbance that manifests itself as visual, sensitive or motor symptoms preceding the headache.

The classification also acknowledges rare forms of this disease as familial hemiplegic migraine, the first migraine syndrome to be linked to a specific set of genetic polymorphisms (Lipton et al., 2004). Whereas there are evidences for a genetic contribution to migraine and that environmental factors also play a role, the brain events that initiate migraine remains unclear. This disease is underdiagnosed and also undertreated. Traditionally, treatment for migraine is divided into acute and preventive approaches, aimed at stopping the evolving attack or stopping the onset of attacks, respectively. Drugs used in acute treatment target the serotonergic system (triptans and ergot derivatives), the inflammatory reaction [non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aspirin] or calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors (gepants). Some preventive drugs target the central nervous system (CNS) inhibitory [gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors] and excitatory systems (glutamatergic neurotransmission, ion channels) and belong to the family of antiepileptic drugs. α1 blockers (oxetorone, indoramine) and β1 blockers (propranolol, metoprolol) can also be used in migraine prophylaxis.

<footnote n="1">¹ Laboratoire de Physiologie Humaine, Faculté de Médecine et Pharmacie, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Service Pharmacie, Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit, Poitiers, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Faculté des Sciences Fondamentales et Appliquées, STIM, ERL 7368-CNRS, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France</footnote>
Recent studies show that gap junction channels seem to be involved in several ways in the pathophysiology of migraine with aura (Sarrouilhe and Dejean, 2012; Karatas et al., 2013). A novel benzopyran compound, (-)-cis-6-acetyl-4S-(3-chloro-4-fluoro-benzoylamino)-3,4-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-2H-benzo[b]pyrane-3 S-ol (SB-220453, tonabersat), was selected for clinical trials as an anti-migraine agent. Preclinical studies showed that tonabersat inhibited cortical spreading depression (CSD) and neurogenic inflammation in animal models of migraine (Durham and Garrett, 2009). CSD is a wave of electrical activity that moves across the cerebral cortex and was proposed to trigger migraine aura and to induce migraine headache (Charles and Baca, 2013). In the time course of animal model trials, tonabersat was shown to inhibit neuronal-glia gap junctions in trigeminal ganglion (TGG), suggesting that this compound could prevent peripheral sensitization within the ganglion (Damodaram et al., 2008). Moreover, the signaling cascade that takes place between CSD induction and activation of the trigeminovascular system was recently elucidated and involved a transient opening of stressed neuronal pannexin1 (Panx1) channels (Karatas et al., 2013). The results of the clinical trials and pharmacokinetic studies indicate that tonabersat is more suitable as a daily prophylactic drug for migraine with aura attacks than in the acute treatment of migraine (Hauge et al., 2009; Silberstein, 2009).

The purpose of this review is to provide up-to-date information of our knowledge about the involvement of gap junction channels in migraine with aura pathophysiology and their emerging role as potential targets in prophylaxis treatment of this disease.

## GAP JUNCTION CHANNELS AND HEMICHANNELS IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM

Gap junctions are specialized regions of the plasma membranes of adjacent cells, separated by an intercellular space (gap) of 2–3 nm, where transmembrane channels are clustered in microdomains. Gap junction channels assemble from the docking of two hemichannels, each of them originating from cells in contact. These channels connect the cytoplasms of the adjacent cells and allow the intercellular passage (gap-junctional intercellular communication; gjic) of small molecules up to approximately 1 kDa (cAMP, IP₃, metabolites, sugars, siRNA, and small peptides). Each hemichannel (or connexon) is an oligomerized hexamer of proteins called connexins (Cxs), surrounding an aqueous pore (1–1.5 nm diameter). To date, 20 members of the Cx family have been identified in mice and 21 in humans (Rackauskas et al., 2010). Cxs are expressed in all tissues except differentiated skeletal muscles, erythrocytes, mature sperm cells and are restricted to certain adult neuronal subpopulations (Söhl et al., 2004). Most cell types express multiple Cx isoforms, and therefore homotypic, heterotypic, and heteromeric gap junction channels may form between cells (Kumar and Gilula, 1996). Cxs have four hydrophobic membrane-spanning domains, two conserved extracellular domains (E1, E2) and three cytoplasmic domains such as both extremities and a loop between transmembrane domains 2 and 3. The C-terminal tail region, diverse in size and sequence, can be phosphorylated (except Cx26) and mediates interactions with partner proteins (Hervé et al., 2004; Sosinsky

and Nicholson, 2005). A new protein family called Panxs (Panx1, 2, and 3) was recently discovered and classified as gap junction proteins due to their homology (25–33% identity) to the more than 25 innexins (Inxs) that have been identified as gap junction proteins of Invertebrates (Yen and Saier, 2007). However, Panxs bear no sequence homology with Chordate Cxs and current studies indicate that Panxs cannot form gap junction channels in vivo. In contrast, Panxs can form hemichannels that allow diffusion of ions and small molecules between intra and extracellular compartments. In Vertebrates, the largely overlapping distribution of Panxs and Cxs in tissues renders the molecular identity of the protein forming hemichannels at non-junctional membrane difficult to establish (Scemes, 2012). Gap junction channels play critical roles in many signaling processes, including coordinated cardiac and smooth muscle contraction, neuronal excitability, neurotransmitter release, insulin secretion, and others. The degree of gjic is sensitive to a variety of stimuli, including growth factors, hormones, cytokines, neurotransmitters, lipophilic agents (alcohols, fatty acids, steroids, and others), changes in the level of intracellular Ca²⁺, pH, in transjunctional applied voltage and in phosphorylation/dephosphorylation processes (Budunova and Williams, 1994; Hervé and Sarrouilhe, 2005).

Cxs are largely represented in the CNS with eleven Cx subtypes (Cxs26, 29, 30, 32, 36, 37, 40, 43, 45, 46, 47). Some of them are expressed in the same cell type, forming intercellular channels with different structural combinations and properties whose physiological significance remains largely unknown (Nakase and Naus, 2004). gjic is observed between astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, neurons (electrical synapses), microglia, ependymal cells as well as between neurons and astrocytes, and astrocytes and oligodendrocytes (Nakase and Naus, 2004; Orthmann-Murphy et al., 2007). In the nervous system, Cx43, Panx1, and Panx2 can form hemichannels at non-junctional membrane which physiological and pathophysiological roles remain to be determined (Kar et al., 2012). In the last decade, the link between inherited mutations in Cx genes, gap junction channel loss of function and human central (Cx47 and type 1 Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-like disease; Cx43 and oculodentodigital dysplasia) and peripheral (Cx32 and type 1 Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease) neuropathies was firmly established (Zoidl and Dermietzel, 2010; Abrams and Scherer, 2012). Changes in Cx expression and gjic capacity were described in brain injuries and dysfunctions as inflammation, epilepsy, and neurodegenerative diseases (Rouach et al., 2002). Thereby, gap junction channels have progressively appeared as potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of a growing number of CNS diseases (Alldredge, 2008).

## MIGRAINE WITH AURA

### PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF MIGRAINE WITH AURA

Progresses in understanding the pathophysiology of migraine was made in recent years (Goadsby et al., 2009a; Olesen et al., 2009). Even if the brain events in the development of migraine with aura are unclear in human, experimental data in murine corroborated by clinical observations allowed to propose a chronology of events linking aura and headache (Bolay et al., 2002). Neuroimaging and experimental studies suggested that CSD triggered migraine aura and was responsible of activation of the trigeminovascular
system and possibly migraine headache (Figure 1). CSD is a
transient disturbance in electroencephalographic activity charac-
terized by slow wave of neuronal and glial depolarization, that
self-propagates at a speed of 2–5 mm/s across the brain cortex or
other brain areas (Charles and Baca, 2013). The depolarization
phase of CSD is associated with a transient increase in cere-
bral blood flow. This depolarization is followed by a long-lasting
suppression of neuronal activity accompanied by a prolonged
decrease in cerebral blood flow. GJIC, and non-junctional Cx-
containing hemichannels, have been proposed to be involved in
CSD, and gap junction blockade would represent a possible ther-
apeutic strategy (For review, see Costa et al., 2013). CSD causes
large shifts in cortical extracellular ionic composition (H⁺, K⁺),
pH, metabolites (nitric oxide (NO), arachidonic acid), and neu-
rotransmitter (glutamate) concentrations (Bolay et al., 2002).
These molecules diffuse locally, depolarize or sensitize perivas-
cular nociceptive trigeminal afferents in *pia mater* (peripheral
sensitization), which, in turn, sensitize and increase neural activ-
ity in the ipsilateral TGG and in the caudal portion of the
trigeminal nucleus (TGN) in the brainstem (central sensitiza-
tion). In the same time, collateral axons of activated neurons in
the TGG release proinflammatory peptides (neurokinin A, CGRP,
substance P) in the *dura mater*, leading to a local sterile inflam-
matory reaction (i.e., in the absence of infection) and then to
headache. Moreover, a central trigeminal-parasympathetic reflex
produces vasodilatation of *dura mater* (and *pia mater*) vessels.

For this, the activation of the TGN, in turn, also induces a
stimulation of the superior salivary nucleus (SSN) of the brain-
stem and perivascular parasympathetic efferents of the *dura mater*
via the sphenopalatine ganglia (SPG). Postganglionic parasympa-
thetic efferents release vasoactive molecules (vasoactive intestinal
polypeptide, NO, acetylcholine) into the *dura mater*, promote
vasodilatation and hyperemia and then could also explain auto-
nomic symptoms that frequently occur during migraine attack.
The perception of pain is mediated by rostral projections from
the TGN to brain structures. It was proposed that in the attack
of migraine with aura, nociception almost originated from pial
perivascular trigeminal afferents with a later contribution from
dural perivascular ones (Olesen et al., 2009).

The cellular mechanisms of initiation and propagation of CSD
is still poorly understood. Astrocytes are highly interconnected
by gap junctions and conduct signals in the form of intercellular
Ca²⁺ waves. Transmission of Ca²⁺ waves may involve cell-to-
cell diffusion of Ca²⁺-mobilizing second messengers through
the gap junction channels between astrocytes, and the extra-
cellular release of ATP through Cx43 and Panx1 hemichannels.
ATP, in turn, can potentially act on the adjacent and/or dis-
tant astrocytic population, in an autocrine/paracrine fashion,
thus amplifying the extent to which Ca²⁺ waves are trans-
mitted (Scemes and Giaume, 2006). It was proposed that gap
junction-mediated propagation of Ca²⁺ waves in astrocytes may
represent the advancing front of CSD but that other factors,

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**FIGURE 1 | Pathophysiology of migraine with aura.** A slow wave of neuronal and glial depolarization, cortical spreading depression (CSD), has been implicated in the mechanism of migraine aura. Moreover, CSD induces an opening of stressed neuronal Panx1 channels with subsequent release of proinflammatory mediators. These mediators activated astrocytes of the *glia limitans* leading to a continuous release of cytokines, prostanoids and nitric oxide to subarachnoid space (1). These molecules diffuse locally and depolarize and sensitize perivascular trigeminal terminals in *pia mater* (2, peripheral sensitization). In turn, the caudal portion of the trigeminal nucleus

(TGN) of the brainstem is activated and sensitized (3, central sensitization). Collateral axons of activated neurons in the trigeminal ganglion (TGG) release proinflammatory peptides in the *dura mater*, inducing a sterile inflammatory reaction and then a headache (4). Moreover, a central trigeminal-parasympathetic reflex, originating from TGN and mediated through the superior salivary nucleus (SSN) of the brainstem and the sphenopalatine ganglia (SPG), produces vasodilatation of *dura mater* vessels (5-7). Pain perception is mediated by projections from the TGN to brain structures (8). Redrawn and modified after (Sarrouilhe and Dejean, 2012).
including K⁺ and glutamate, are necessary for sustained propa-
gation (Martins-Ferreira et al., 2000). The N-methyl-D-aspartate
(NMDA) receptor antagonist, MK-801, blocks CSD but, unlike
the gap junction blocker carbenoxolone, does not inhibit trans-
mission of Ca²⁺ waves (Peters et al., 2003). So, the advancing
front of CSD may contribute to the trigger of the depolarization of
surrounding neurons, leading to further release of glutamate and
K⁺ into the extracellular environment. Interestingly, astrocytic Cx
hemichannels can contribute to the release of glutamate in the
extracellular space (Ye et al., 2003). Glutamate, in turn, through
the NMDA receptor may then stimulate cytosolic Ca²⁺ oscilla-
tions in astrocytes, allowing CSD propagation (Martins-Ferreira
et al., 2000). More recently, the signaling cascade that takes place
between CSD induction and activation of the trigeminovascular
system was elucidated in mice (Karatas et al., 2013). It is now
evident that Panx1 is functionally linked to the purinergic P2X7
receptor and that the two proteins may also interact physically.
Moreover, one or both of these proteins may be directly linked
with the inflammasome, a multiprotein complex that mediates
the innate inflammatory response (MacVicar and Thompson,
2009; Dahl and Keane, 2012). CSD induces a transient opening
of stressed neuronal Panx1 channels with subsequent activa-
tion of the inflammasome, leading to a cleavage of caspase 1 to
its proteolytic form and a release of pro-inflammatory agents
[high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), interleukin-1β (IL-1β)],
both of which take part in the initiation of the inflammatory
response (Silverman et al., 2009; Karatas et al., 2013). Nuclear fac-
tor KappaB (NF-κB) is activated and translocated to the nucleus
followed by cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) and inducible nicotinic oxide
synthase (iNOS) induction in astrocytes forming the glia limitans.
The parenchymal inflammatory response leads to a continuous
release of cytokines, prostanoids and NO to subarachnoid space
that, in turn, promotes a prolonged activation of the perivascu-
lar nociceptive trigeminal afferents in pia mater. So, in contrast
to mediators such as H⁺ and K⁺ that are transiently released
during CSD, the parenchymal inflammatory response may pro-
vide continuous release of mediators required for sensitization of
trigeminal nerve endings and lasting headache. The inhibition of
Panx1 channel by carbenoxolone abolishes caspase 1 activation,
NF-κB translocation and trigeminal activation. These results sug-
gest that Panx1 channels may play a role as a reporter linking
neuronal stress to inflammatory reaction (Karatas et al., 2013).

The genetic influences of migraine at the population level are
largely unknown. Progress in genetic analysis has been largely
restricted to rare monogenic subtypes of migraine as famil-
ial hemiplegic migraine. Recent genome-wide association study
(GWAS) allowed the identification of various susceptibility loci
for common forms of migraine. The minor allele of rs1835740
on chromosome 8q22.1 was identified to be associated with
migraine, and particularly in individuals with migraine with aura.
Rs1835740 is located between two genes involved in glutamate
homeostasis, suggesting a possible link between the identified
variant and the regulation of a neurotransmitter that has long
been suspected to play a role in migraine pathophysiology (Antilla
et al., 2010). The TRESK K2P potassium channel, encoded by
the KCNK18 gene (10q25.3) and known to be involved in pain
pathways, has been linked to migraine with aura in a single

family (Lafrenière et al., 2010). In another GWAS, three sus-
ceptibility loci for common forms of migraine (with or without
aura) were identified and suggested a shared pathophysiology
among migraine with or without aura. TRPM8 (2q37.1) encodes
a member of the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily
of channels that is involved in neuropathic pain; LRP1 (12q13.3)
encodes a receptor that could modulate glutamatergic synap-
tic transmission; PRDM16 (1q36.32) which potential role in
migraine is unclear (Chasman et al., 2011).

Then, in genetically susceptible patients, mutations in these
genes may reduce the threshold for CSD. Triggers of migraine
attacks would induce CSD in such a hyper-excitable cortex by
modifying the activity of ionic channels and then by altering
ionic flow across cell membrane (Chakravarty, 2010). However,
the respective roles and interaction of genetic and environmental
factors in this multifactorial disorder remain to be determined.

ANTI-MIGRAINE THERAPY

Treatment for migraine is divided into acute and preventive approaches, aimed at stopping the evolving attack (relief of symptoms) or reducing the frequency of occurrence of attacks, respectively (Figure 2). The chronic treatment may last more than 1 year depending on the evolution of the disease. Acute treatment of vasodilatation and pain during attacks can control symptoms in 70% of attacks.

"Acute" therapy

Painful symptoms, arising from vasodilatation of cerebral vessels and inflammatory processes, require medication with powerful and fast action. The effectiveness of an acute therapy of migraine mainly depends on its earliness.

Some serotonergic agonists, which are antimigraine drugs with vasoconstrictive action, have high efficacy and are widespread prescribed. Ergot derivatives, which exert vasoconstrictive effect through the activation of 5HT<sub>1A,1B,1D</sub> receptors, are also dopaminergic and adrenergic antagonists. Only two molecules are indicated in migraine attacks: ergotamine (exclusive use) and dihydroergotamine also used for prophylaxis. For all these drugs, there are oral, nasal and injectable forms, suitable for emergency treatment. Triptans cause vasoconstriction of the meningeal vessels by their agonist effect on the serotonin receptor 5-HT<sub>1B</sub>. They also induce an inhibition of pro-inflammatory neuropeptide release by trigeminal nerve endings through the activation of 5-HT<sub>1D</sub> receptors. However, the effectiveness of triptan treatment during the aura phase remains controversial (D'Andrea et al., 2011). Indeed, it was proposed that the blood-brain barrier remains impermeable to triptans during the aura. Moreover, according to a study made with sumatriptan, the incorporation of 5-HT<sub>1D</sub> receptors in the synaptic membrane would occur only after the onset of headache (Aurora et al., 2009). Because of their vasoconstrictive properties, triptans cannot be used in patients with vascular risk factors.

Migraine headache is associated with trigeminal nerve activa-
tion and CGRP release from the trigeminovascular system. CGRP
is a vasodilatory neuropeptide and development of its antagonists
is supported by the fact that they were highly effective in the treat-
ment of migraine attacks (Edvinsson et al., 2012). Olcegepant,
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 2** | Some targets of anti-migraine drugs. Drugs written in red have been shown to exert an inhibitory effect on CSD.</figcaption></figure>

telcagepant, MK-3207 and BI 44370 TA constitute the new family of the gepants. They have displayed efficacy without vasoconstrictive effect, with fewer adverse effects and longer period than triptans (Costa et al., 2013). Moreover, the gepants have been reported to inhibit CSD (Figure 2).

The inflammatory reaction associated with the migraine is also a therapeutic target for some medications. Aspirin and NSAIDs such as ketoprofen, ibuprofen, diclofenac are effective on attacks of mild to moderate intensity. They act by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, and thus, prevent the synthesis of pro-inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins. Acetaminophen, despite widespread use, was poorly investigated as an anti-migraine drug. Anti-migraine agents can be addressed in combination to improve treatment compliance, efficacy or tolerability. For example, a triptan can be used 2 h after failure to NSAID treatment. The use of antiemetics (metoclopramide or domperidone) in acute migraine attacks is recommended because these drugs can improve the absorption of co-administered analgesics (Evers et al., 2009).

### Migraine prophylaxis

Migraine prophylaxis is recommended when seizure frequency increases (more than two attacks per month) and/or intensity of the symptoms, as well as the duration of the aura. To reduce these parameters (frequency, intensity, or duration of crisis), a variety of drugs (sometimes off-label) acting through various mechanisms can be used.

Some of migraine drugs act through the serotonin receptors (pizotifen, methysergide, dihydroergotamine, oxetorone), calcium and sodium voltage-gated channels (flunarizine or anti-epileptics such as gabapentin, valproate, topiramate, and lamotrigine) or the glutamatergic neurotransmission (lamotrigine). Besides, topiramate and valproate are also GABA receptor agonists. Lamotrigine is an anti-epileptic drug that would specifically prevent migraine with aura (Lampl et al., 2005). A tricyclic antidepressant, amitriptyline, may prevent the secretion of neurotransmitters by modulating calcium channels (Wu et al., 2012). Moreover, the glutamatergic antagonism, as a protective action of neural response to CSD, is currently investigated (Olesen and Ashina, 2011). Adrenergic blockers can also be used to act on the vascular system (α-blockers: oxetorone, indoramine and antihypertensive β1 blockers: propranolol, metoprolol). Vascular reactivity is also modulated by inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme (lisinopril) and inhibitors of angiotensin II (telmisartan, candesartan). Naproxen, a NSAID, is used in prophylaxis as a modulator of inflammation. This is also the case of aspirin for treating migraines with aura. Finally, the mechanism of action of botulinum toxin (which inhibits the release of acetylcholine) has not been solved and the effectiveness of this toxin in prophylactic treatment appeared to be controversial in recent multicenter studies (Bekkelund and Alstadhaug, 2011; Marmura and Silberstein, 2011).

Drugs used in migraine prophylaxis (amitriptyline, methysergide, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, valproate,
and propranolol) have been shown to experimentally suppress CSD susceptibility (Figure 2). Acute administration of these drugs was ineffective, only longer treatment duration produced CSD suppression (Costa et al., 2013). CSD-associated blood flow changes are experimentally modulated by α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and GABA receptors, suggesting that these receptors constitute targets of migraine therapy in inhibiting CSD (Holland et al., 2010). Furthermore, NR2B-containing NMDA receptors were shown to be key mediators of CSD, and as such, memantine- and some NR2B-selective antagonists may be useful therapeutic agents for the treatment of migraine with aura (Peeters et al., 2007).

In conclusion, if synapses, ionic channels, neurotransmitter receptors of neurons are numerous targets for such prophylactic treatment, the role of gap junction channels in CSD propagation, activation of the trigeminovascular system and peripheral (and central, see below) sensitization opens new perspectives of research.

# GAP JUNCTION CHANNELS AS THERAPEUTIC TARGETS

## PRECLINICAL STUDIES

Structure-activity relationship study of a new class of potential antimigraine agents identified tonabersat, a novel *cis* benzopyran, on the basis of its high efficacy at inhibiting neuronal hyperexcitability and trigeminal nerve stimulated neurogenic inflammation in rodent models (Chan et al., 1999). A release of NO occurs during the headache phase of a migraine attack and it is proposed that NO plays a pivotal role in depolarization and sensitization of perivascular nociceptive trigeminal afferents. Intraperitoneal administration of tonabersat (10 mg·kg⁻¹) potently inhibited NO release following a cortical KCl stimulus in anaesthetized cats (Read et al., 2000). In a further work using the same anaesthetized cat model, tonabersat produces a marked dose-dependent inhibition of repetitive CSD and reduces CSD-induced repetitive episodes of pial artery vasodilatation (Smith et al., 2000). When compared with the serotoninergic agonist sumatriptan (5-HT₁D,₁B agonist), tonabersat seemed to be devoid of adverse cardiovascular side-effects in isolated human tissues (Maassen Van Den Brink et al., 2000). In a study using repetitive diffusion-weighted MR imaging, the inhibitory effects of tonabersat on CSD event number and duration of activity was confirmed *in vivo* in the cat cerebral cortex. The drug also reduced significantly the magnitude of the cortical area involved in CSD episodes (Bradley et al., 2001). There is increasing evidence for a role of a *dura mater* neurovascular event, involving reflex activation of the parasympathetic nervous system, in migraine with aura attack. The effects of tonabersat were investigated in a model of trigeminal nerve parasympathetic neurovascular reflexes in anaesthetized cats, in which stimulation of the TGG produces an increase in carotid blood flow. Intravenous infusion of tonabersat (3.4 µmol·h⁻¹) produced 4 h later a maximal inhibition of the neurovascular reflex (30% compared to control) whereas an intraduodenal administration (10 mg·kg⁻¹) produced it (55% inhibition) 2 h later (Parsons et al., 2001). In spite of its broader spectrum of activity, tonabersat has been well tolerated and is devoided of CNS adverse effects, even at high doses. While clinical trials were started, a new mechanism of action was proposed for

this drug (Damodaram et al., 2008). Within the TGG, cell bodies of afferent neurons are completely surrounded by several satellite glial cells that can influence neuronal activity by controlling their chemical environment. In rat, dye-coupling experiments demonstrated that neuronal-satellite cells can communicate via gap junction channels following neuronal activation in response to inflammatory stimuli rather than under normal basal conditions. These results suggested that neuronal-satellite glial cell signaling is involved in initiating and maintaining peripheral sensitization in the TGG and, thus, initiates migraine (Thalakoti et al., 2007). Under basal conditions, qPCR analysis of total RNA extracted from rat TGG allowed to detect mRNA of various Cxs (Cx26, Cx36, Cx40, and Cx43). Immunochemical analysis showed that Cx26 plaque formation between neurons and satellite cells was transiently increased in response to acute temporomandibular joint inflammation, and was sustained in chronic joint inflammation. Cx36 and Cx40 expression was shown to be only increased in neurons where they may form hemichannels. In contrast, Cx43 expression was not increased in TGG cells during acute or chronic joint inflammation. The temporomandibular joint model showed that inflammation duration was accompanied by differential Cx expression changes in TGG cells allowing increased GJIC between neurons and satellite cells (Garrett and Durham, 2008). Intraperitoneal administration of tonabersat (10 mg·kg⁻¹) inhibited neuronal-satellite cell GJIC in TGG likely through a decrease of Cx26 expression since tonabersat treatment reduced Cx26 staining and number of junctional plaques (Damodaram et al., 2008). First, the results suggested that the high affinity and stereospecific binding site for tonabersat could be neuronal-glial cell gap junctions (Chan et al., 1999). Second, tonabersat should be able to prevent peripheral sensitization within the TGG.

Carbenoxolone, a potent blocker of both Cx43-made gap junctions and hemichannels and purinergic P2X7 receptor-associated Panx1 hemichannels completely suppressed central sensitization in an *in vivo* acute dental inflammation rat model and significantly attenuated it in an *in vivo* rat neuropathic pain model (Chiang et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2014). These results suggest that gap junctions and/or hemichannels play a critical role in mediating central sensitization in nociceptive neurons of the brainstem trigeminal *subnucleus caudalis* (often termed the medullary dorsal horn).

Probenecid, a well-established drug for the treatment of gout, is a powerful inhibitor of Panx1 hemichannels. Interestingly, Cx46 channels and the chimera Cx32E₁43 channels (where the sequence of the first extracellular loop of Cx32 is replaced by that of Cx43) are not affected by probenecid (Silverman et al., 2008). In an *in vivo* rat model of migraine involving the systemic administration of the NO donor nitroglycerin, probenecid pre-treatment was shown to block the inflammatory process in the caudal TGN, also involved in the pathogenesis of migraine. Probenecid being also a non-selective inhibitor of multidrug resistance-associated protein and organic anion transporters, further studies are needed to determine the exact mechanism of the modulatory effect of this drug in trigeminal activation (Vamos et al., 2009).

Another study has shown that quinine, quinidine, and mefloquine are able to inhibit CSD in a rat neocortical slice model
in vitro (Margineanu and Klitgaard, 2006). The alkaloids quinine, quinidine and the derivative mefloquine, commonly used as antimalarial drugs are known to reversibly and specifically abolish current through Cx36 channels (and with lesser potency through Cx50 channels) in transfected mammalian cells (Hervé and Sarrouilhe, 2005). The binding site for quinine is proposed to be intracellular, possibly within the pore of the gap junction channel (Srinivas et al., 2001). These results suggest an involvement of neuronal Cx36 channels in CSD propagation and might bear potential relevance for migraine with aura therapy (Margineanu and Klitgaard, 2006).

In conclusion, the preclinical studies identified tonabersat as a candidate for clinical evaluation of the treatment of migraine and gap junction channels as a potential therapeutic target.

## CLINICAL TRIALS

A randomized, double-blind crossover, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy of tonabersat in the human experimental migraine model in which glyceryltrinitrate was used to induce migraine (Tvedskov et al., 2004). This two-center study (Denmark, UK) included 15 patients (18–55 years old), with 6–36 migraines without aura attacks per year. Patients were scheduled to have 2 study days separated by at least 11 days. On both study days, oral administration of tonabersat (40 mg) or placebo was followed 60 min after by glyceryltrinitrate infusion (0.5 µg/kg per min for 20 min in the cubital vein). The study was stopped prematurely after the unexpected observation of episodes of hypotension in 4 patients, which in two cases led to serious adverse events, suggesting a possible interaction between tonabersat and glyceryltrinitrate when the two compounds were concurrently administered. In the nine patients where comparison could be made, no significant preventive anti-migraine activity could be detected when tonabersat was compared with placebo. However, the number of treated patients in this study was too small to show any significance.

A second randomized, double-blind parallel group, placebo-controlled, multicenter (Denmark, Hungary, South Africa), phase II study further investigated tonabersat as a putative migraine prophylactic agent (Goadsby et al., 2009b). The clinical trial recruited patients (18–55 years old) experiencing between 2 and 6 migraine attacks (with or without aura) per month, for ≥ 1 year. The International Headache Society criteria for migraine with aura and migraine without aura were used to establish the diagnosis (Headache classification subcommittee of the International Headache Society, 2004). In total 160 patients were enrolled for a 4-week baseline observation period, after which 124 were randomized. The patients orally received tonabersat 20 mg daily (or matching placebo) for 2 weeks and 40 mg daily (or placebo) for further 10 weeks. 123 patients provided usable efficacy data, 58 in the tonabersat arm and 65 in the placebo arm. The study failed on its primary endpoint, the change in mean monthly migraine days from baseline to month 3 of the treatment period. In contrast, tonabersat had promising statistically significant effects on two predetermined secondary endpoints among ten, the change in the mean monthly consumption of rescue medication from the baseline period to month 3, and the overall 50% responder rate at 3 months. Unexpectedly, placebo responses were high for

all endpoints and may have compromised the outcome of the study. However, the secondary endpoints data and the fact that tonabersat was very well tolerated support further exploration of this compound in a larger scale clinical trial.

A further single-center, randomized, double-blind parallel group, placebo-controlled phase IIb tonabersat evaluation in migraine prevention in the US (TEMPUS) involved approximately 500 patients with episodic migraine with or without aura. The TEMPUS study was significantly longer than the 3 months treatment period in the earlier phase IIa trial since the earlier trial showed that tonabersat was more effective toward the end of the 3 months period. The fact that tonabersat was very well tolerated in the previous study, allowed to explore the effects of increasing the dose (Goadsby et al., 2009b). Following a 4-week baseline observation period, the patients received either tonabersat (40 or 80 mg) or placebo on a once-daily basis. The 20-week study did not meet its primary endpoint of reducing the migraine attacks suffered by patients during the last 8 weeks of the 20-week treatment period compared to baseline period. A detailed analysis of the TEMPUS results has not been published (Peroutka, 2009).

An important step was taken forward with a fourth, single-center (Denmark), randomized, double-blind crossover, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial. In contrast to the former, this study only included patients having migraine with aura exhibiting frequent aura attacks (Hauge et al., 2009). The study involved 39 patients (18–65 years old) who had at least 1 aura attack per month during the past 3 months. As previously reported, the patients suffering migraine with aura who were involved in the study had attacks with and without aura (Eriksen et al., 2004). Eight patients were excluded during the study and 31 completed the trial and were analyzed. Two treatment periods of 12 weeks (tonabersat and then placebo or placebo and then tonabersat) were separated by a washout period of 4 weeks with placebo. During each 12-week treatment period, tonabersat or matching placebo dose was increased from 20 to 40 mg at week 3. For the first primary endpoint, a significant reduction in the number of aura attacks, with or without headache, was observed during treatment with tonabersat compared with placebo. The median number of attacks of aura followed by headache was also significantly reduced. In contrast, the trial failed on its second primary endpoint, the reduction in migraine headache days with or without aura. The results showed that the gap junction antagonist, tonabersat, also known to inhibit CSD, has a preventive effect in migraine with aura but no efficacy on days with any type of migraine. These results are in agreement with previous studies using functional neuroimaging that have shown that cerebral spreading hypoperfusion, and probably CSD, are present only in migraine with aura (Sanchez del Rio and Alvarez Linera, 2004; Costa et al., 2013). Up to now, there is no direct evidence that CSD is the initiating mechanism in migraine without aura. The results of this crossover clinical trial do not support previous observation suggesting that an asymptomatic CSD is involved in attacks of migraine without aura (Woods et al., 1994). This small clinical trial requires confirmation in a larger randomized controlled preventive study in patients with migraine with aura.

However, what is the efficacy of tonabersat in the acute treatment of migraine? In 2009, two original articles described, in the
same issue of Cephalalgia, the results of three multi-center phase
II clinical trials that explored the ability of tonabersat to relieve the
symptoms of migraine attacks. These randomized, double-blind
parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multi-center, studies included
patients (between 18 and 65 years old) suffering migraines with or
without aura for at least 1 year before the trial, with 1–6 attacks
each month. In the first study evaluating tonabersat as an acute
treatment of migraine, the clinical trial was conducted in 53 cen-
ters in 12 countries (Dahlöf et al., 2009). A total of 693 patients
suffering from migraine with or without aura were screened,
among which 667 were enrolled and randomized to treatment
in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Patients received 20 or 40 mg of tonabersat, or
50 mg sumatriptan as a positive control, or placebo in a single oral
dose at the onset of a moderate or severe attack. Among the 667
patients enrolled and randomized, 541 received allocated inter-
vention and the results were analyzed for 406 of them. Tonabersat
(20 or 40 mg) did not provide a significant advantage over placebo
in headache relief determined 2 h after treatment (primary end-
point). Headache relief (rated on the International Headache
Society scale), which is self-evaluated by the patient, is defined as a
change in severity of the migraine symptoms from grade 2 (mod-
erate) or 3 (severe) at pretreatment to grade 0 (none) or 1 (mild)
2 h after the treatment. Tonabersat had no effect on any sec-
ondary outcome variable, complete abolition of headache at 2 h
and headache relief at 1 and 4 h, compared with placebo (Dahlöf
et al., 2009). The efficacy of tonabersat in the acute treatment of
migraine attacks has also been assessed in two other large clinical
trials, one conducted in Europe, Australia, South Africa (named
international study), and one in North America (USA, Canada)
(Silberstein et al., 2009). In the International study, 549 patients
were screened, among which 525 were enrolled and randomized
and 441 received allocated intervention. In the North American
study, 534 patients were screened, among which 506 were enrolled
and randomized and 418 received allocated intervention. Patients
took a single oral dose of tonabersat (15, 40, 80 mg in the
International study; 25, 40, 80 mg in the North American study)
or matching placebo at the onset of moderate or severe headache
symptoms. The results were analyzed for 438 patients enrolled
in the International study and 413 in the North American one.
In the International study, tonabersat was significantly more effi-
cient than placebo in relieving moderate to severe migraine pain.
Significantly more patients who received tonabersat (40 mg) than
those who received placebo experienced headache relief at 2 h
(primary endpoint) or 4 h (secondary endpoint), or complete
abolition of headache at 4 h (secondary endpoint). In the North
American study, no significant benefits of tonabersat compared
to placebo were observed. In these studies, previous triptan expo-
sure appeared to affect the response to tonabersat. Moreover,
pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that tonabersat was absorbed
relatively slowly, and so required a long time to reach maxi-
mum plasma concentrations. The observed lack of efficacy may
be a function of the slow absorption of tonabersat that could
result in an insufficient therapeutic effect on acute migraine.
Delayed absorption in patients with migraine has been previously
reported during an attack and was proposed to be due to slower
gastric emptying (Aurora et al., 2006; Silberstein et al., 2009).
These pharmacokinetic characteristics indicate that tonabersat is

more suitable as a daily prophylactic drug for migraine attacks
(Silberstein, 2009).

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Gap junction channels seem to be involved at different levels in the pathophysiology of migraine with aura. At a first level, GJIC and Cx-made hemichannels have been proposed to be involved in CSD propagation (Martins-Ferreira et al., 2000). The Cx36 channel blockers quinine, quinidine, and mefloquine are able to inhibit CSD in rats *in vitro*, suggesting an involvement of neuronal Cx36 channels in CSD propagation (Margineanu and Klitgaard, 2006). At a second level, the stressed neuronal Panx1 channels have been shown to be transiently opened in response to CSD propagation (Karatas et al., 2013). At a third level, in the TGG, gap junctions between neuronal and satellite glial cells seem to be involved in initiating and maintaining peripheral sensitization (Damodaram et al., 2008). And finally, at a fourth level, in the brainstem, it was suggested that gap junctions and/or hemichannels play a role in mediating central sensitization (Chiang et al., 2010).

Tonabersat, was selected for clinical trial on the basis of its inhibitory activity on CSD and neurogenic inflammation in animal models of migraine. Moreover, in preclinical studies, tonabersat was shown to inhibit GJIC between neurons and satellite glial cells within the TGG (Durham and Garrett, 2009). However, three randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials aimed at investigating the effectiveness of tonabersat as a preventive drug were negative (Tvedskov et al., 2004; Goadsby et al., 2009b; Peroutka, 2009). Moreover, conflicting results were obtained in dose ranging, placebo-controlled trials concerning its ability to relieve attacks (Silberstein et al., 2009). In contrast, in another randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial, tonabersat showed a preventive effect on attacks of migraine with aura but had no efficacy on non-aura attacks (Hauge et al., 2009). So, blocking CSD may represent a target for tonabersat in preventing migraine with aura. Diverse anti-migraine drugs have been shown to experimentally suppress CSD (For review, see Costa et al., 2013). Among them are the antiepileptic drugs (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, valproate), the β1 blocker propranolol, the tricyclic antidepressant amitryptiline, gepants and tonabersat. At a molecular level, these drugs exert their inhibitory effects on CSD, based on their mechanisms of action. Panx1 channel activity can be modulated by various mechanisms including activation via membrane depolarization, elevated extracellular K+, ionotropic receptors (including the NMDA glutamatergic receptor) and G protein-coupled receptors (Sandilos and Bayliss, 2012). It has been proposed that the advancing front of CSD may contribute to the trigger of the depolarization of the surrounding neurons, leading to further release of glutamate and K+ into the extracellular environment (Martins-Ferreira et al., 2000). Thus, inhibition of CSD propagation and, in turn, of release of glutamate and K+, could result in a reduced Panx1 channel activity. In the same way, inhibition of CSD, by reducing stressed neuronal Panx1 channel activity and, in turn, iNOS induction in astrocytes forming the glia limitans, could explain the potent inhibition of NO release observed following tonabersat pre-treatment in the CSD-anaesthetized cat model (Read et al., 2000; Karatas et al., 2013).
The extent to which migraine with aura and migraine without aura are different disorders has been the subject of much debate. Tonabersat, having a preventive effect in migraine with aura but no efficacy on non-aura attacks, suggests that an asymptomatic CSD is not involved in attacks of migraine without aura.

Preclinical studies and clinical trials also showed that tonabersat was well tolerated, with no effects on arterial blood pressure and heart rate. Moreover, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of tonabersat indicate that it is more suitable as a prophylactic therapy for migraine attacks. Comparing with the potential targets of currently utilized preventive drugs, tonabersat has a unique mechanism of action without vasoconstrictive adverse effect and might represent an interesting future possibility for the prophylaxis of this disease. It is estimated that about a third of migraineurs experiences aura. So, even if tonabersat benefits only to patients suffering migraine with aura, a substantial number of them could benefit from this drug. Moreover, the risk of ischemic stroke is doubled in migraine with aura, particularly in young women. The risk is greater for those with a higher frequency of migraine attacks (Kurth et al., 2012). Furthermore, MRI studies have shown an association between migraine with aura and a significantly increased risk of brain lesions (Kruit et al., 2010). The availability of a new therapeutic agent that could not only prevent the immediate discomfort associated with migraine but also potential long-term risks of repeated attacks, would be an important step forward. Migraine-preventive agents are still under-used while they could lower healthcare costs. The development of a preventive medication could reduce use of drugs for acute attacks and decreases visits to medical office and emergency departments.

Epilepsy and migraine are chronic neurological disorders with episodic manifestations that frequently occur together. Neuronal hyperexcitability is an underlying mechanistic similarity common to both disorders. Some antiepileptic drugs have a preventive effect in migraine without aura and possibly in migraine with aura (Haut et al., 2006). Across a number of preclinical studies, tonabersat also demonstrated an anti-seizure profile and is currently being evaluated in phase I studies as an investigational drug for treating epilepsy (Bialer et al., 2013).

The pathophysiology of migraine with aura involves GJIC between neurons and glial cells in the neocortex and TGG. Tonabersat treatment reduced Cx26 staining and number of junctional plaques in TGG cells. However, given the large number of Cxs expressed in nervous system, it is probable that other Cx proteins may also be regulated by tonabersat. Moreover, Panx1 channel activity at the plasma membrane being modulated by trafficking dynamics, a potential modulation of Panx1 trafficking by tonabersat requires experimental testing (Sandilos and Bayliss, 2012). Characterization of Cxs involved in the pathophysiology of migraine with aura and the development of models allowing their study are avenues to be explored in the future. This would allow the development of new therapeutic tools to treat efficiently and safely migraine with aura by suppressing or reducing specifically GJIC in cell subpopulations of the nervous system.

## REFERENCES

Abrams, K. K., and Scherer, S. S. (2012). Gap junctions in inherited human disorders of the central nervous system. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* 1818, 2030–2047. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.08.015

Alldredge, B. (2008). Clinical connexions. *J. Clin. Pathol.* 61, 885–890. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2008.055699

Antilla, V., Stefansson, H., Kallela, M., Todt, U., Terwindt, G. M., Calafato, M. S., et al. (2010). Genome-wide association study of migraine implicates a common susceptibility variant on 8q22.1. *Nat. Genet.* 42, 869–873. doi: 10.1038/ng.652

Aurora, S. K., Barrodale, P. M., McDonald, S. A., Jakubowski, M., and Burstein, R. (2009). Revisiting the efficacy of sumatriptan therapy during the aura phase of migraine. *Headache* 49, 1001–1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01429.x

Aurora, S. K., Kori, S. H., Barrodale, P., McDonald, S. A., and Haseley, D. (2006). Gastric stasis in migraine: more than just a paroxysmal abnormality during a migraine attack. *Headache* 46, 57–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00311.x

Bekkelund, S. I., and Alstadhaug, K. B. (2011). Migraine prophylactic drugs – something new under the sun? *Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs* 20, 1201–1210. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2011.601741

Bialer, M., Johannessen, S. I., Levy, R. H., Perucca, E., Tomson, T., and White, H. S. (2013). Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the eleventh Eilat conference (EILAT XI). *Epilepsy Res.* 103, 2–30. doi: 10.1016/j.elepyres.2012.10.001

Bolay, H., Reuter, U., Dunn, A. K., Huang, Z., Boas, D. A., and Moskowitz, M. A. (2002). Intrinsic brain activity triggers trigeminal meningeal afferents in a migraine model. *Nat. Med.* 8, 136–142. doi: 10.1038/nm0202-136

Bradley, D. P., Smith, M. I., Netsiri, C., Smith, J. M., Bockhorst, K. H. J., Hall, L. D., et al. (2001). Diffusion-weighted MRI used to detect *in vivo* modulation of cortical spreading depression: comparison of sumatriptan and tonabersat. *Exp. Neurol.* 172, 342–353. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7809

Budunova, I. V., and Williams, G. M. (1994). Cell culture assays for chemicals with tumor-promoting or tumor-inhibiting activity based on the modulation of intercellular communication. *Cell Biol. Toxicol.* 10, 71–116. doi: 10.1007/BF00756491

Chakravarty, A. (2010). How triggers trigger acute migraine attacks: a hypothesis. *Med. Hypotheses* 74, 750–753. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.10.027

Chan, W. N., Evans, J. M., Hadley, M. S., Herdon, H. J., Jerman, J. C., Parsons, A. A., et al. (1999). Identification of (-)-cis-6-acetyl-4S—(3-chloro-4-fluoro-benzoylamino)-3,4-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-2H-benzo[b] pyran-3S-ol as a potential antimigraine agent. *Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.* 9, 285–290. doi: 10.1016/S0960-894X(98)00728-8

Charles, A. C., and Baca, S. M. (2013). Cortical spreading depression and migraine. *Nat. Rev. Neurol.* 9, 637–644. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.192

Chasman, D. I., Schurks, M., Anttila, V., de Vries, B., Schminke, U., Launer, L. J., et al. (2011). Genome-wide association study reveals three susceptibility loci for common migraine in the general population. *Nat. Genet.* 43, 695–699. doi: 10.1038/ng.856

Chiang, C. Y., Li, Z., Dostrovsky, J. O., and Sessle, B. J. (2010). Central sensitization in medullary dorsal horn involves gap junctions and hemichannels. *Neuroreport* 21, 233–237. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328336eeecb

Costa, C., Tozzi, A., Rainero, I., Cupini, L. M., Calabresi, P., Ayata, C., et al. (2013). Cortical spreading depression as a target for anti-migraine agents. *J. Headache Pain* 14, 62. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-62

Dahl, G., and Keane, R. W. (2012). Pannexin: from discovery to bedside in 11 ± 4 years? *Brain Res.* 1487, 150–159. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.04.058

Dahlöf, C. G. H., Hauge, A. W., and Olesen, J. (2009). Efficacy and safety of tonabersat, a gap-junction modulator, in the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, parallel-group, randomized study. *Cephalalgia* 29, 7–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01975.x

Damodaram, S., Thalakoti, S., Freeman, S. E., Garrett, F. G., and Durham, P. L. (2008). Tonabersat inhibits trigeminal ganglion neuronal-satellite glial cell signaling. *Headache* 49, 5–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01262.x

D'Andrea, G., Collavito, D., Dalle Carbonare, M., and Leon, A. (2011). Migraine with aura: conventional and non-conventional treatments. *Neurol. Sci.* 32, S121–S129. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0529-0

Durham, P. L., and Garrett, F. G. (2009). Neurological mechanisms of migraine: potential of the gap-junction modulator tonabersat in prevention of migraine. *Cephalalgia* 29, 1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01976.x

Edvinsson, L., Villalón, C. M., and MaassenVanDenBrink, A. (2012). Basic mechanisms of migraine and its acute treatment. *Pharmacol. Ther.* 136, 319–333. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.08.011

Eriksen, M. K., Thomsen, L. L., Andersen, I., Nazim, F., and Olesen, J. (2004). Clinical characteristics of 362 patients with familial migraine with aura. *Cephalalgia* 24, 564–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2003.00718.x
Evers, S., Afra, J., Frese, A., Goadsby, P. J., Linde, M., May, A., et al. (2009). EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine-revised report of an EFNS task force. *Eur. J. Neurol.* 16, 968–981. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02748.x

Garrett, F. G., and Durham, P. L. (2008). Differential expression of connexins in trigeminal ganglion neurons and satellite glial cells in response to chronic or acute joint inflammation. *Neuron. Glia Biol.* 4, 295–306. doi: 10.1017/S1740925X09990093

Goadsby, P. J., Charbit, A. R., Andreou, A. P., Akerman, S., and Holland, P. R. (2009a). Neurobiology of migraine. *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.* 16, 327–341. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.019

Goadsby, P. J., Ferrari, M. D., Csanyi, A., Olesen, J., and Mills, J. G. (2009b). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study of the cortical spreading depression inhibiting agent tonabersat in migraine prophylaxis. *Cephalalgia* 29, 742–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01804.x

Hauge, A. W., Asghar, M. S., Schytz, H. W., Christensen, K., and Olesen, J. (2009). Effects of tonabersat on migraine with aura: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. *Lancet Neurol.* 8, 718–723. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70135-8

Haut, S. R., Bigal, M. E., and Lipton, R. B. (2006). Chronic disorders with episodic manifestations: focus on epilepsy and migraine. *Lancet Neurol.* 5, 148–157. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70348-9

Headache classification subcommittee of the International Headache Society. (2004). The international classification of headache disorders: 2nd edition. *Cephalalgia* 24, 9–160.

Hervé, J. C., Bourmeyster, N., and Sarrouilhe, D. (2004). Diversity in protein-protein interactions of connexins: emerging roles. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* 1662, 22–41. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.10.022

Hervé, J. C., and Sarrouilhe, D. (2005). Connexin-made channels as pharmacological targets. *Curr. Pharm. Des.* 11, 1941–1958. doi: 10.2174/138162054021060

Holland, P. R., Akerman, S., and Goadsby, P. J. (2010). Cortical spreading depression-associated cerebral blood flow changes induced by mechanical stimulation are modulated by AMPA and GABA receptors. *Cephalalgia* 30, 519–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.02021.x

Kar, R., Batra, N., Riquelme, M. A., and Jiang, J. X. (2012). Biological role of connexin intercellular channels and hemichannels. *Arch. Biochem. Biophys.* 524, 2–15. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.03.008

Karatas, H., Erdener, S. E., Gursoy-Ozdemir, Y., Lule, S., Eren-Koçak, E., Sen, Z. D., et al. (2013). Spreading depression triggers headache by activating neuronal panx1 channels. *Science* 339, 1092–1095. doi: 10.1126/science.1231897

Kruit, M. C., van Buchem, M. A., Launer, L. J., Terwindt, G. M., and Ferrari, M. D. (2010). Migraine is associated with an increased risk of deep white matter lesions, subclinical posterior circulation infarcts and brain iron accumulation: the population-based MRI camera-study. *Cephalalgia* 30, 129–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01904.x

Kumar, N. M., and Gilula, N. B. (1996). The gap junction communication channel. *Cell* 84, 381–388. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81282-9

Kurth, T., Chabriat, H., and Bousser, M. G. (2012). Migraine and stroke: a complex association with clinical implications. *Lancet Neurol.* 11, 92–100. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70266-6

Lafrenière, R. G., Cader, M. Z., Poulin, J. F., Andres-Enguix, I., Simoneau, M., and Gupta, N. (2010). A dominant-negative mutation in the TRESK potassium channel is linked to familial migraine with aura. *Nat. Med.* 16, 1157–1161. doi: 10.1038/nm.2216

Lampl, C., Katsarava, Z., Diener, H. C., and Limmroth, V. (2005). Lamotrigine reduces migraine aura and migraine attacks in patients with migraine with aura. *J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry* 76, 1730–1732. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.063750

Lipton, R. B., Bigal, M. E., Steiner, T. J., Silberstein, S. B., and Olesen, J. (2004). Classification of primary headaches. *Neurology* 63, 427–435. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000133301.66364.9B

Lipton, R. B., Stewart, W. F., Diamond, S., Diamond, M. L., and Reed, M. (2001). Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American migraine study II. *Headache* 41, 646–657. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007646.x

MaassenVanDenBrink, A., van den Broek, R. W. M., de Vries, R., Upton, N., Parsons, A. A., and Saxena, P. R. (2000). The potential anti-migraine compound SB-220453 does not contract human isolated blood vessels or myocardium; a comparison with sumatriptan. *Cephalalgia* 20, 538–545. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00078.x

MacVicar, B. A., and Thompson, R. J. (2009). Non-junction functions of pannexin-1 channels. *Trends Neurosci.* 33, 93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.11.007

Margineanu, D. G., and Klitgaard, H. (2006). The connexin 36 blockers quinine, quinidine and mefloquine inhibit cortical spreading depression in a rat neocortical slice model *in vitro*. *Brain Res. Bull.* 71, 23–28. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.07.011

Marmura, M. J., and Silberstein, S. D. (2011). Current understanding and treatment of headache disorders: five new things. *Neurology* 76, S31–S35. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820c95cc

Martins-Ferreira, H., Nedergaard, M., and Nicholson, C. (2000). Perspectives on spreading depression. *Brain Res. Rev.* 32, 215–234. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00083-1

Nakase, T., and Naus, C. C. (2004). Gap junctions and neurological disorders of the central nervous system. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* 1662, 149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.01.009

Olesen, J., and Ashina, M. (2011). Emerging migraine treatments and drug targets. *Trends Pharmacol. Sci.* 32, 352–359. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2011.02.016

Olesen, J., Burstein, R., Ashina, M., and Tfelt-Hansen, P. (2009). Origin of pain in migraine: evidence for peripheral sensitisation. *Lancet Neurol.* 8, 679–690. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70090-0

Orthmann-Murphy, J. L., Abrams, C. K., and Scherer, S. S. (2007). Gap junctions couple astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. *J. Mol. Neurosci.* 35, 101–116. doi: 10.1007/s12031-007-9027-5

Parsons, A. A., Bingham, S., Raval, P., Read, S., Thompson, M., and Upton, N. (2001). Tonabersat (SB-220453) a novel benzopyran with anticonvulsant properties attenuates trigeminal nerve-induced cardiovascular reflexes. *Br. J. Pharmacol.* 132, 1549–1557. doi: 10.1038/sj.bp.0703932

Peeters, M., Gunthorpe, M. J., Strijbos, P. J. L. M., Goldsmith, P., Upton, N., and James, M. F. (2007). Effects of pan- and subtype-selective N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists on cortical spreading depression in the rat: therapeutic potential for migraine. *J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.* 321, 564–572. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.117101

Peroutka, S. J. (2009). 2008: the year in review. *Headache* 49, 796–802. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01422.x

Peters, O., Schipke, C. G., Hashimoto, Y., and Kettenmann, H. (2003). Different mechanisms promote astrocyte Ca²⁺ waves and spreading depression in mouse neocortex. *J. Neurosci.* 23, 9888–9896.

Rackauskas, M., Neverauskas, V., and Skeberdis, V. A. (2010). Diversity and properties of connexin gap junction channels. *Medicina* 63, 1–12.

Read, S. J., Smith, M. I., Hunter, A. J., Upton, N., and Parsons, A. A. (2000). SB-220453, a potential novel antimigraine agent, inhibits nitric oxide release following induction of cortical spreading depression in the anaesthetized cat. *Cephalalgia* 20, 92–99. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00022.x

Rouach, N., Avignone, E., Même, W., Koulakoff, A., Venance, L., Blomstrand, F., et al. (2002). Gap junctions and connexin expression in the normal and pathological central nervous system. *Biol. Cell* 94, 457–475. doi: 10.1016/S0248-4900(02)00016-3

Sanchez del Rio, M., and Alvarez Linera, J. (2004). Functional neuroimaging of headaches. *Lancet Neurol.* 3, 645–651. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00904-4

Sandilos, J. J., and Bayliss, D. A. (2012). Physiological mechanisms for the modulation of pannexin1 channel activity. *J. Physiol.* 590, 6257–6266. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.240911

Sarrouilhe, D., and Dejean, C. (2012). Gap junctional intercellular communication: a new mechanism in pathophysiology of migraine with aura. Therapeutic applications. *Pathol. Biol.* 60, 392–398. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2012.04.002

Scemes, E. (2012). Nature of plasmalemmal functional “hemichannels”. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* 1818, 1880–1883. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.06.005

Scemes, E., and Giaume, C. (2006). Astrocyte calcium waves. *Glia* 54, 716–725. doi: 10.1002/glia.20374

Silberstein, S. D. (2009). Tonabersat, a novel gap-junction modulator for the prevention of migraine. *Cephalalgia* 29, 28–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01973.x

Silberstein, S. D., Schoenen, J., Göbel, H., Diener, H. C., Elkind, A. H., Klapper, J. A., et al. (2009). Tonabersat, a gap-junction modulator: efficacy and safety in two randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging studies of acute migraine. *Cephalalgia* 29, 17–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01974.x

Silverman, W. R., de Rivero Vaccari, J. P., Locovei, S., Qiu, F., Carlsson, S. K., Scemes, E., et al. (2009). The pannexin 1 channel activates the
inflammasome in neurons and astrocytes. *J. Biol. Chem.* 284, 18143–18151. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.004804

Silverman, W. R., Locovei, S., and Dahl, G. (2008). Probenecid, a gout remedy, inhibits pannexin 1 channels. *Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.* 295, C761–C767. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00227.2008

Smith, M. I., Read, S. J., Chan, W. N., Thompson, M., Hunter, A. J., Upton, N., et al. (2000). Repetitive cortical spreading depression in a gyrencephalic feline brain: inhibition by the novel benzoylamino-benzopyran SB-220453. *Cephalalgia* 20, 546–553. doi: 10.1016/j.1468-2982.2000.00092.x

Söhl, G., Odermatt, B., Maxeiner, S., Degen, J., and Willecke, K. (2004). New insights into the expression and function of neural connexins with transgenic mouse mutants. *Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.* 47, 245–259. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.05.006

Sosinsky, G. E., and Nicholson, B. J. (2005). Structural organization of gap junction channels. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* 1711, 99–125. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.04.001

Srinivas, M., Hopperstad, M. G., and Spray, D. C. (2001). Quinine blocks specific gap junction channel subtypes. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 98, 10942–10947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191206198

Stovner, L. J., Zwart, J. A., Hagen, K., Terwindt, G. M., and Pascual, J. (2006). Epidemiology of headache in Europe. *Eur. J. Neurol.* 12, 333–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01184.x

Thalakoti, S., Patil, V. V., Damodaram, S., Vause, C. V., Langford, L. E., Freeman, S. E., et al. (2007). Neuron-glia signaling in trigeminal ganglion: implications for migraine pathology. *Headache* 47, 1008–1025. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00854.x

Tvedskov, J. F., Iversen, H. K., and Olesen, J. A. (2004). Double-blind study of SB-220453 (tonabersat) in the glyceryltrinitrate (GTN) model of migraine. *Cephalalgia* 24, 875–882. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00762.x

Vamos, E., Pardutz, A., Fejes, A., Tajti, J., Toldi, J., and Vecsei, L. (2009). Modulatory effects of probenecid on the nitroglycerin-induced changes in the rat caudal trigeminal nucleus. *Eur. J. Pharmacol.* 621, 33–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.08.034

Wang, H., Cao, Y., Chiang, C.-Y., Dostrovsky, J. O., and Sessle, B. J. (2014). The gap junction blocker carbenoxolone attenuates nociceptive behavior and

medullary dorsal horn central sensitization induced by partial infraorbital nerve transection in rats. *Pain* 155, 429–435. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.11.004

Woods, R. P., Iacoboni, M., and Mazziotta, J. C. (1994). Brief report: bilateral spreading cerebral hypoperfusion during spontaneous migraine headache. *N. Engl. J. Med.* 331, 1689–1692. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199412223312505

Wu, W., Ye, Q., Wang, W., Yan, L. Y., Wang, Q., Xiao, H., et al. (2012). Amitriptyline calcium currents and intracellular calcium concentration in mouse trigeminal ganglion neurons. *Neurosci. Lett.* 506, 307–311. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.11.031

Ye, Z.-C., Wyeth, M. S., Baltan-Tekkok, S., and Ransom, B. R. (2003). Functional hemichannels in astrocytes: a novel mechanism of glutamate release. *J. Neurosci.* 23, 3588–3596.

Yen, M. R., and Saier, M. H. Jr. (2007). Gap junctional proteins of animals: the innexin/pannexin superfamily. *Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.* 94, 5–14. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2007.03.006

Zoidl, G., and Dermietzel, R. (2010). Gap junctions in inherited human disease. *Pflugers Arch.* 460, 451–466. doi: 10.1007/s00424-010-0789-1

**Conflict of Interest Statement:** The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

*Received: 04 November 2013; accepted: 07 February 2014; published online: 25 February 2014.*

*Citation: Sarrouilhe D, Dejean C and Mesnil M (2014) Involvement of gap junction channels in the pathophysiology of migraine with aura. *Front. Physiol.* 5:78. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00078*

*This article was submitted to Membrane Physiology and Membrane Biophysics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology.*

Copyright © 2014 Sarrouilhe, Dejean and Mesnil. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.