# Meson Particle Listings

B±

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{533}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8.6 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of $B^0\bar{B}^0$ and $B^+\bar{B}^-$ at $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^0 a_1(1260)^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{534}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.0 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.2 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BEBEK</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BORTOLETTO 89 reports < 5.4 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$.

²We rescale to 50%.

²ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of $B^0\bar{B}^0$ and $B^+\bar{B}^-$ at $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^0 a_2(1320)^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{535}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.6 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 BEBEK</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BORTOLETTO 89 reports < 6.3 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$.

²We rescale to 50%.

²BEBEK 87 reports < 2.3 × 10⁻³ assuming the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^0 \pi^+, b^0_1 \to \omega \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{536}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.7 ± 1.7 ± 1.0</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07B1 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^+_1 \pi^0, b^+_1 \to \omega \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{537}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{538}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of $B^0\bar{B}^0$ and $B^+\bar{B}^-$ at $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^+_1 \rho^0, b^+_1 \to \omega \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{539}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AF BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^+_1 \rho^0, b^+_1 \to \omega \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{541}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AF BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(a_1(1260)^+ a_1(1260)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{540}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.3 × 10<sup>-2</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of $B^0\bar{B}^0$ and $B^+\bar{B}^-$ at $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(h^+ \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{542}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>16<sup>+6</sup><sub>-5</sub> ± 3.6</td><td></td><td>GODANG</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\omega h^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{543}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

### 13.8<sup>+2.7</sup><sub>-2.4</sub> OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>13.4<sup>+3.3</sup><sub>-2.9</sub> ± 1.1</td><td>1 LU</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>14.3<sup>+3.6</sup><sub>-3.2</sub> ± 2.0</td><td>1 JESSOP</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>25<sup>+8</sup><sub>-7</sub> ± 3</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(h^+ \chi^0 (\text{Familon})) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{544}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;49</td><td>90</td><td>1 AMMAR</td><td>01B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AMMAR 01B searched for the two-body decay of the B meson to a massless neutral feebly-interacting particle $\chi^0$ such as the familon, the Nambu-Goldstone boson associated with a spontaneously broken global family symmetry.

$$ \Gamma(\chi^+ \chi^0, \chi^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{545}/\Gamma $$

$\chi^0$ stands here for a long-lived scalar particle.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17AQ LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 17AQ searched for a long-lived scalar particle $\chi^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ in the mass range 250-4700 MeV and lifetime range 0.1-1000 ps. The limit is between $10^{-7}$ and $2 \times 10^{-10}$ in these ranges except in vetoed mass regions around $K^0_S$, $J/\psi$, $\psi(2S)$, and $\psi(3770)$.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{546}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.62 ± 0.20</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.60<sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.19</sub> ± 0.12</td><td>1,2,3 WEI</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.69 ± 0.29 ± 0.26</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.07 ± 0.11 ± 0.11</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>14AF LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.06<sup>+0.73</sup><sub>-0.62</sub> ± 0.37</td><td>1,3 WANG</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by WEI 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 3.7</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 ABE</td><td>02K BELL</td><td>Repl. by WANG 04</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;500</td><td>90</td><td>5 ABREU</td><td>95N DLPH</td><td>Repl. by ADAM 96D</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;160</td><td>90</td><td>6 BEBEK</td><td>89 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>570 ± 150 ± 210</td><td>7 ALBRECHT</td><td>88F ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

²Explicitly vetoes resonant production of $p\bar{p}$ from Charmonium states.

³Also provides results with $m_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85 \text{ GeV/c}^2$ and angular asymmetry of $p\bar{p}$ system.

⁴Requires $m_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.

⁵Assumes a $B^0$, $B^-$ production fraction of 0.39 and a $B_S$ production fraction of 0.12.

⁶BEBEK 89 reports < 1.4 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

⁷ALBRECHT 88F reports (5.2 ± 1.4 ± 1.9) × 10⁻⁴ assuming the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$ decays 45% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}\pi^+ \text{ nonresonant}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{547}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;53</td><td>90</td><td>BERGFELD</td><td>96B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}\pi^+ \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{548}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.58 ± 1.17 ± 0.67</td><td></td><td>1 CHU</td><td>20 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ from $\mathcal{T}(4S)$ decays. This measurement is quoted for $M(\pi^+\pi^0) < 1.3 \text{ GeV}$.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}\pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{549}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>88F ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALBRECHT 88F reports < 4.7 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$ decays 45% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{550}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

5.9 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.5.

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.54<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.25</sub> ± 0.36</td><td>1,2,3 WEI</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>6.7 ± 0.5 ± 0.4</td><td>1,3 AUBERT, B</td><td>05L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.59<sup>+0.38</sup><sub>-0.34</sub> ± 0.50</td><td>1,2,3 WANG</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by WEI 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.66<sup>+0.67</sup><sub>-0.57</sub> ± 0.62</td><td>1,2,3 WANG</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by WANG 05A</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.3<sup>+0.38</sup><sub>-0.9</sub> ± 0.5</td><td>1,2 ABE</td><td>02K BELL</td><td>Repl. by WANG 04</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

²Explicitly vetoes resonant production of $p\bar{p}$ from Charmonium states.

³Provides also results with $m_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85 \text{ GeV/c}^2$ and angular asymmetry of $p\bar{p}$ system.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}K^+) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{550}/\Gamma_{295} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0104 ± 0.0005 ± 0.0001</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>13s LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 13s reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to p\bar{p}K^+) / \Gamma(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+)] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] = 4.91 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.14$ which we multiply by our best value $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Measurement includes contribution where $p\bar{p}$ is produced in charmonium decays.

$$ \Gamma(\Theta(1710)^{++}, \Theta^{++} \to pK^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{551}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.091</td><td>90</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.1</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 AUBERT, B</td><td>05L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

²Provides upper limits depending on the pentaquark masses between 1.43 to 2.0 GeV/c².
$$
\Gamma(f_j(2220)K^+, f_j \to p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{552}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;0.41</td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>1 WANG</td>
      <td>05A</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\pi}\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{553}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;6.3 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>CHU</td>
      <td>23</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\Lambda}(1520))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{554}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>3.15&plusmn;0.48&plusmn;0.27</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>1 AAIJ</td>
      <td>14AF</td>
      <td>LHCB</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>3.9</td>
    <td>+1.0</td>
    <td>&pm;0.3</td>
    <td>1 AAIJ</td>
    <td>13AU LHCB</td>
    <td>Repl. by AAIJ 14AF</td>
  </tr>
</table>

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;15</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 AUBERT, B</td>
    <td>05L</td>
    <td>BABR</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹Uses B(B⁺ → J/ψK⁺) = (1.016 ± 0.033) × 10⁻³, B(J/ψ → pρ) = (2.17 ± 0.07) × 10⁻³ and B(A(1520) → K⁻p) = 0.234 ± 0.016.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{p}K^+\text{nonresonant})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{555}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;89</td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>BERGFELD</td>
      <td>96B</td>
      <td>CLE2</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{p}K^+(892^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{556}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
</table>

3.6 $\frac{+0.8}{-0.7}$ OUR AVERAGE

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>3.38<sup>+0.73</sup><sub>-0.60</sub></td>
    <td>&pm;0.39</td>
    <td>1,2 CHEN</td>
    <td>08C</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>5.3 &pm;1.5</td>
    <td>&pm;1.3</td>
    <td>2 AUBERT</td>
    <td>07AV</td>
    <td>BABR</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>10.3</td>
    <td>+3.6</td>
    <td>+1.3</td>
    <td>2,3 WANG</td>
    <td>04</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by CHEN 08C</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>-2.8</td>
    <td>-1.7</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹Explicitly vetoes resonant production of pρ from charmonium states.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³Explicitly vetoes resonant production of pρ from charmonium states. The branching fraction for M<sub>Dρ</sub> < 2.85 GeV/c² is also reported.

$$
\Gamma(f_j(2220)K^+, f_j \to p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{557}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;0.77</td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>07AV</td>
      <td>BABR</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\Lambda})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{558}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>0.24<sup>+0.10</sup><sub>-0.08</sub></td>
      <td>&pm;0.03</td>
      <td>1 AAIJ</td>
      <td>17R</td>
      <td>LHCB</td>
      <td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt; 0.32</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 TSAI</td>
    <td>07</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt; 0.49</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 CHANG</td>
    <td>05</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by TSAI 07</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt; 1.5</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 BORNHEIM</td>
    <td>03</td>
    <td>CLE2</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt; 2.2</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 ABE</td>
    <td>020</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt; 2.6</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 COAN</td>
    <td>99</td>
    <td>CLE2</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;60</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>3 AVERY</td>
    <td>89B</td>
    <td>CLEO</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;93</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>4 ALBRECHT</td>
    <td>88F</td>
    <td>ARG</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹Statistical significance of the signal is 4.1 standard deviations where the normalization is based on B(B⁺ → K⁰Sπ⁺) = (11.895 ± 0.375) × 10⁻⁰⁶.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³AVERY 89B reports < 5 × 10⁻⁵ assuming the T(4S) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

⁴ALBRECHT 88f reports < 8.5 × 10⁻⁵ assuming the T(4S) decays 45% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\Lambda}\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{559}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>2.45<sup>+0.44</sup><sub>-0.38</sub></td>
      <td>&pm;0.22</td>
      <td>1 WANG</td>
      <td>07C</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>2.16<sup>+0.58</sup><sub>-0.53</sub></td>
    <td>&pm;0.20</td>
    <td>1 LEE</td>
    <td>05</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by WANG 07C</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;3.9</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 EDWARDS</td>
    <td>03</td>
    <td>CLE2</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Corresponds to E<sub>γ</sub> > 1.5 GeV. The limit changes to 3.3 × 10⁻⁶ for E<sub>γ</sub> > 2.0 GeV.

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\Lambda}\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{560}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>3.00<sup>+0.61</sup><sub>-0.53</sub></td>
      <td>&pm;0.33</td>
      <td>1 WANG</td>
      <td>07C</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\Sigma}(1385)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{561}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;0.47</td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>1 WANG</td>
      <td>07C</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\Delta^+\bar{\Lambda})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{562}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;0.82</td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>1 WANG</td>
      <td>07C</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\rho\Sigma^\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{563}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;4.6</td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>1 LEE</td>
      <td>05</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;7.9</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 EDWARDS</td>
    <td>03</td>
    <td>CLE2</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Corresponds to E<sub>γ</sub> > 1.5 GeV. The limit changes to 6.4 × 10⁻⁶ for E<sub>γ</sub> > 2.0 GeV.

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\Lambda}\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{564}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>11.28<sup>+0.91</sup><sub>-0.72</sub></td>
      <td>&pm;1.03</td>
      <td>1 CHEN</td>
      <td>09C</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;200</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 ALBRECHT</td>
    <td>88F</td>
    <td>ARG</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²ALBRECHT 88f reports < 1.8 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(4S) decays 45% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\Lambda}\pi^+\pi^-\text{nonresonant})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{565}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>5.92<sup>+0.88</sup><sub>-0.84</sub></td>
      <td>&pm;0.69</td>
      <td>1 CHEN</td>
      <td>09C</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\Lambda}\rho^0, \rho^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{566}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>4.78<sup>+0.67</sup><sub>-0.64</sub></td>
      <td>&pm;0.60</td>
      <td>1 CHEN</td>
      <td>09C</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\Lambda}f_2(1270), f_2 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{567}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>2.03<sup>+0.77</sup><sub>-0.72</sub></td>
      <td>&pm;0.27</td>
      <td>1 CHEN</td>
      <td>09C</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\Lambda}K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{568}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>4.10<sup>+0.45</sup><sub>-0.43</sub></td>
      <td>&pm;0.50</td>
      <td>1 LU</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\rho\bar{\Lambda}\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{569}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>0.795&pm;0.209&pm;0.077</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>1 LU</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\bar{p}\Lambda K^+ K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{570}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>3.70<sup>+0.39</sup><sub>-0.37</sub></td>
      <td>&pm;0.44</td>
      <td>1 LU</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{571}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;0.94</td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>1,2 CHANG</td>
      <td>09</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;2.8</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 LEE</td>
    <td>04</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹For m<sub>ΛΛ</sub> < 2.85 GeV/c².

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{572}/\Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>3.38<sup>+0.41</sup><sub>-0.36</sub></td>
      <td>&pm;0.41</td>
      <td>1,2 CHANG</td>
      <td>09</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>2.91<sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-0.70</sub></td>
    <td>&pm;0.38</td>
    <td>2 LEE</td>
    <td>04</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by CHANG 09</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹Excluding charmonium events in 2.85< m<sub>ΛΛ</sub> < 3.128 GeV/c² and 3.315< m<sub>ΛΛ</sub> < 3.735 GeV/c². Measurements in various m<sub>ΛΛ</sub> bins are also reported.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).
# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}K^{++})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{573}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.19<sup>+1.13</sup><sub>-0.88</sub>±0.33</td><td>1,2 CHANG</td><td>09</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹For $m_{\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}} < 2.85$ GeV/c².

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda(1520)\bar{\Lambda}K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{574}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.23±0.63±0.25</td><td>1 LU</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}(1520)K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{575}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><2.08 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>1 LU</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\Delta^0 p) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{576}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>< 1.38</td><td>90</td><td>1 WEI</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;380</td><td>90</td><td>2 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²BORTOLETTO 89 reports < 3.3 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(\Delta^{++}\bar{p}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{577}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>< 0.14</td><td>90</td><td>1 WEI</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;150</td><td>90</td><td>2 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²BORTOLETTO 89 reports < 1.3 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(D^+ p\bar{p}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{578}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><1.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>02W</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^*(2010)^+ p\bar{p}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{579}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><1.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>02W</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 p\bar{p}\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{580}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.72±0.11±0.25</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..12</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses the values of $D$ and $D^*$ branching fractions from PDG 08.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 p\bar{p}\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{581}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.73±0.17±0.27</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..12</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses the values of $D$ and $D^*$ branching fractions from PDG 08.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^- p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{582}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.66±0.13±0.27</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..12</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses the values of $D$ and $D^*$ branching fractions from PDG 08.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(D^* - p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{583}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.86±0.16±0.19</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..12</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses the values of $D$ and $D^*$ branching fractions from PDG 08.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{\Lambda}^0 \bar{D}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{584}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.43<sup>+0.28</sup><sub>-0.25</sub>±0.18</td><td>1,2 CHEN</td><td>11F</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-) = 63.9 \pm 0.5\%$, $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = 3.89 \pm 0.05\%$, and $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+\pi^0) = 13.9 \pm 0.5\%$.

²Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ from Upsilon(4S) decays.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{\Lambda}^0 \bar{D}^*(2007)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{585}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>< 90</td><td>90</td><td>1,2,3 CHEN</td><td>11F</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹CHEN 11F reports < 4.8 × 10⁻⁵ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to p\bar{\Lambda}^0 \bar{D}^*(2007)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0)]$ assuming $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0) = (61.9 \pm 2.9) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^*(2007)^0 \to D^0\pi^0) = 64.7 \times 10^{-2}$.

²Uses $B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-) = 63.9 \pm 0.5\%$ and $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = 3.89 \pm 0.05\%$.

³Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ from Upsilon(4S) decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c p\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{586}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.3 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 2.4. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>2.72±0.16±0.12</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>08BN</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.61±0.20±0.07</td><td>1,3 GABYSHEV</td><td>06A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.9 ±0.5 ±0.1</td><td>1,4 DYTMAN</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.5 ±0.4 ±0.1</td><td>1,5 GABYSHEV</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by GABYSHEV 06A</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>6.2 <sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-2.0</sub> ±1.6</td><td>1,6 FU</td><td>97</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by DYTMAN 02</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²AUBERT 08BN reports $(3.4 \pm 0.1 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{\Lambda}_c p\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³GABYSHEV 06A reports $(2.01 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{\Lambda}_c p\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 0.05$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴DYTMAN 02 reports $(2.4^{+0.63}_{-0.62}) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{\Lambda}_c p\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 0.05$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵GABYSHEV 02 reports $(1.87^{+0.51}_{-0.49}) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{\Lambda}_c p\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 0.05$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁶FU 97 uses PDG 96 values of $\Lambda_c$ branching fraction.

<figure><img src="image_585.png" /><figcaption>WEIGHTED AVERAGE
2.3±0.4 (Error scaled by 2.4)</figcaption></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c \Delta(1232)^{++}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{587}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>< 1.9</td><td>90</td><td>GABYSHEV</td><td>06A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c \Delta(1600)^{++}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{588}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.7±0.9±0.2</td><td>1 GABYSHEV</td><td>06A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹GABYSHEV 06A reports $(5.9 \pm 1.0 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \bar{\Lambda}_c \Delta(1600)^{++}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 0.05$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.
$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c(2593)^- / \bar{\Lambda}_c(2625)^- \rho\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE} \\
<1.9 \times 10^{-4} \\
\text{CL\%} \\
90
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1.2 \text{ DYTMAN} \\
02
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
\text{CLE2}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{COMMENT} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{602}/\Gamma
$$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²DYTMAN 02 measurement uses $B(\Lambda_c^- \to \bar{p}K^+\pi^-) = 5.0 \pm 1.3\%$. The second error includes the systematic and the uncertainty of the branching ratio.

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\Xi_c^0 \Lambda_c^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \\
9.51 \pm 2.10 \pm 0.88
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ LI}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
19\text{A BELL}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{COMMENT} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{603}/\Gamma
$$

¹First measured the absolute branching fraction using a missing-mass technique.

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\Xi_c^0 \Lambda_c^+, \Xi_c^0 \to \Xi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\
1.76 \pm 0.29 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \\
1.71 \pm 0.28 \pm 0.15 \\
2.0 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.1
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ LI} \\
2,3 \text{ AUBERT}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
08\text{H BABR}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{COMMENT} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S) \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\bullet \bullet \text{ We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.} \bullet \bullet \bullet \\
\bullet \bullet \text{ Using a hadronic B-tagging method based on a full reconstruction.}
\end{array}
$$

$$
4.5 \quad +1.8 \atop -1.5 \quad \pm 0.2 \qquad 3,4 \text{ CHISTOV} \quad 06A \text{ BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by LI } 19A
$$

¹Using a hadronic B-tagging method based on a full reconstruction.

²AUBERT 08H reports $(2.51 \pm 0.89 \pm 0.61) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \Xi_c^0 \Lambda_c^+) \to \Xi_c^0 \to \Lambda K^+\pi^-] / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

⁴CHISTOV 06A reports $(5.6 \pm 1.9 \pm 1.5 \pm 0.1) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \Xi_c^0 \Lambda_c^+) \to \Xi_c^0 \to \Lambda K^+\pi^-] / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\Xi_c^0 \Lambda_c^+, \Xi_c^0 \to \Lambda K^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\
1.14 \pm 0.26 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ LI}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
19\text{A BELL}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{COMMENT} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S) \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{605}/\Gamma
$$

$$
1.11 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.10 \qquad 1 \text{ LI} \qquad 19A \text{ BELL} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)
$$

$$
1.4 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.1 \qquad 2,3 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 08\text{H BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \mathcal{T}(4S)
$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
3.2 \quad +1.1 \atop -1.0 \quad \pm 0.1 \qquad 3,4 \text{ CHISTOV} \quad 06A \text{ BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by LI } 19A
$$

¹Using a hadronic B-tagging method based on a full reconstruction.

²AUBERT 08H reports $(1.70 \pm 0.93 \pm 0.53) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \Xi_c^0 \Lambda_c^+) \to \Xi_c^0 \to \Lambda K^+\pi^-] / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

⁴CHISTOV 06A reports $(4.0 \pm 1.1 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.1) \times 1.3 \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \Xi_c^0 \Lambda_c^+) \to \Xi_c^0 \to \Lambda K^+\pi^-] / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\Xi_c^0 \Lambda_c^+, \Xi_c^0 \to pK^- K^- \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\
5.47 \pm 1.78 \pm 0.57
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ LI}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
19A BELL
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{COMMENT} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{606}/\Gamma
$$

¹Using a hadronic B-tagging method based on a full reconstruction.

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \Xi_c^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE} \\
<6.5 \times 10^{-4}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{CL\%} \\
90
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ LI}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
19G BELL
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{COMMENT} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{607}/\Gamma
$$

¹Uses fully reconstructed B⁺ meson on tag side and recoil against Λ⁺c on signal side.

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \Xi_c^0(2645)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE} \\
<7.9 \times 10^{-4}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{CL\%} \\
90
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ LI}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
19G BELL
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{COMMENT} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{608}/\Gamma
$$

¹Uses fully reconstructed B⁺ meson on tag side and recoil against Λ⁺c on signal side.

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \Xi_c^0(2790)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-3}) \\
1.1 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.2
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ LI}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
19G BELL
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{COMMENT} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{609}/\Gamma
$$

¹Uses fully reconstructed B⁺ meson on tag side and recoil against Λ⁺c on signal side.

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(p\psi_{DS}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE} \\
< 10^{-7} \times 10^{-5} \\
\text{CL\%} \\
90
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ LEES} \\
23C \text{ BABR}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{610}/\Gamma
$$

¹LEES 23C searched for $\psi_{DS}$, where $\psi_{DS}$ is a dark sector antibaryon, in the recoil mass against p and the fully reconstructed accompanying B meson. The cited upper limit is for $m_{\psi_{DS}}$ between 1 and 4.3 GeV/c².

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\pi^+ \ell^+ \ell^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE} \\
<4.9 \times 10^{-8} \\
\text{CL\%} \\
90
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ WEI} \\
08A \text{ BELL}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{611}/\Gamma
$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
<6.6 \times 10^{-8} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ LEES} \qquad 13M \text{ BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

$$
<1.2 \times 10^{-7} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 07A \text{ BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\pi^+ e^+ e^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-8}) \\
<8.0 \times 10^{-8} \\
\text{CL\%} \\
90
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ WEI} \\
08A \text{ BELL}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{612}/\Gamma
$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
<12.5 \times 10^{-8} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ LEES} \qquad 13M \text{ BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

$$
<18 \times 10^{-8} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 07A \text{ BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

$$
<3.9 \times 10^{-3} \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{ WEIR} \qquad 90B \text{ MRK2} \qquad e^+ e^- \to 29 \text{ GeV}
$$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²WEIR 90B assumes B⁺ production cross section from LUND.

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\pi^+ \mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-8}) \\
1.78 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.03
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ AAIJ} \\
15AR \text{ LHCB}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
\text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV}
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{613}/\Gamma
$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
<5.5 \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{ LEES} \qquad 13M \text{ BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

$$
2.3 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.1 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \qquad 12A \text{ LHCB} \qquad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 15AR}
$$

$$
<6.9 \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{ WEI} \qquad 08A \text{ BELL} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

$$
<28 \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 07A \text{ BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

¹AAIJ 15AR reports $(1.83 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-8}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \pi^+\mu^+\mu^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+)] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-)]$ assuming $B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+) = (1.05 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (5.961 \pm 0.033) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best values $B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+) = (1.020 \pm 0.019) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (5.961 \pm 0.033) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\pi^+ \mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma(\kappa^+ \mu^+ \mu^-) \\
\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-8}) \\
1.78 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.03
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ AAIJ} \\
15AR \text{ LHCB}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
\text{pp at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV}
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{613}/\Gamma
$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
0.053 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.001 \qquad \text{AAIJ} \qquad 12A \text{ YHCB} \qquad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 15AR}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(\pi^+ \nu\bar{\nu}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\
<1.4 \times 10^{-5} \\
\text{CL\%} \\
90
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ GRYGIER} \\
17 \text{ BELL}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{614}/\Gamma
$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
<9.8 \times 10^{-5} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ LUTZ} \qquad 13 \text{ BELL} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

$$
<1.7 \times 10^{-4} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ CHEN} \qquad 07D \text{ BELL} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

$$
<1.0 \times 10^{-4} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 05H \text{ BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\begin{array}{l}
\Gamma(K^+ \ell^+ \ell^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \\
\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-7}) \\
4.7 \pm 0.5 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{DOCUMENT ID} \\
1 \text{ AAIJ} \\
15AR \text{ LHCB}
\end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{l}
\text{TECN} \\
\text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV}
\end{array}
\qquad
\Gamma_{615}/\Gamma
$$

Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

4.7 ±0.5 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.3. See the ideogram below.

$$
5.99^{+0.45}_{-0.43} \pm 0.14 \qquad \text{CHOUDHURY 21} \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

$$
4.36 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.18 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \qquad 13H \text{ LHCB} \qquad \text{pp at } 7 \text{ TeV}
$$

$$
4.8 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.2 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 09T \text{ BABR} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$
5.3 \quad +0.6 \atop -0.5 \quad \pm 0.3 \qquad 2,3 \text{ WEI} \qquad 09A \text{ BELL} \qquad e^+ e^- \to \Gamma(4S)
$$

$$
3.8 \quad +0.9 \atop -0.8 \quad \pm 0.2 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 06J \text{ BABR} \qquad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 09T}
$$

$$
5.3 \quad +1.1 \atop -1.0 \quad \pm 0.3 \qquad 2 \text{ ISHIKAWA} \qquad 03 \text{ BELL} \qquad \text{Repl. by WEI 09A}
$$

¹Uses B($B^+ \to J/\psi K^+ \to \mu^+\mu^- K^+$) = (6.01 ± 0.21) × 10⁻⁵.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³Superseded by CHOUDHURY 21.
<figure><img src="image_586.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}e^{+}e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{616}/\Gamma $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-7}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

### 5.6 $\pm 0.6$ OUR AVERAGE

$$ 5.75^{+0.64}_{-0.61} \pm 0.15 \qquad \text{CHOUDHURY 21} \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

$$ 5.1^{+1.2}_{-1.1} \pm 0.2 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 09T \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 5.7^{+0.9}_{-0.8} \pm 0.3 \qquad 1,2 \text{ WEI} \quad 09A \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

$$ 4.2^{+1.2}_{-1.1} \pm 0.2 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT, B} \quad 06J \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 09T} $$

$$ 10.5^{+2.5}_{-2.2} \pm 0.7 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03U \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT, B 06J} $$

$$ 6.3^{+1.9}_{-1.7} \pm 0.3 \qquad 3 \text{ ISHIKAWA} \quad 03 \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by WEI 09A} $$

$$ <14 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ ABE} \qquad 02 \qquad \text{BELL} \qquad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

$$ <9 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 02L \qquad \text{BABR} \qquad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

$$ <24 \qquad 90 \qquad 4 \text{ ANDERSON} \quad 01B \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Gamma(4S)$.

²Superseded by CHOUDHURY 21.

³Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ at $\Gamma(4S)$. The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.

⁴The result is for di-lepton masses above 0.5 GeV.

$$ \Gamma(K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{617}/\Gamma $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-7}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

### 4.53 $\pm 0.35$ OUR FIT

Error includes scale factor of 2.9.

$$ 6.24^{+0.65}_{-0.61} \pm 0.16 \qquad \text{CHOUDHURY 21} \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

$$ 4.29^{+0.07}_{-0.21} \pm 0.21 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 14M \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} $$

$$ 4.1^{+1.6}_{-1.5} \pm 0.2 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 09T \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 4.36^{+0.15}_{-0.18} \pm 0.18 \qquad 3 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 13H \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 14M} $$

$$ 5.3^{+0.8}_{-0.7} \pm 0.3 \qquad 2,4 \text{ WEI} \quad 09A \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

$$ 3.1^{+1.5}_{-1.2} \pm 0.3 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT, B} \quad 06J \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 09T} $$

$$ 0.7^{+1.9}_{-1.1} \pm 0.2 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03U \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT, B 06J} $$

$$ 4.5^{+1.4}_{-1.2} \pm 0.3 \qquad 5 \text{ ISHIKAWA} \quad 03 \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by WEI 09A} $$

$$ 9.8^{+4.6}_{-3.6} \pm 1.6 \qquad 2 \text{ ABE} \quad 02 \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by ISHIKAWA 03} $$

$$ <12 \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 02L \qquad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

$$ <36.8 \qquad 90 \qquad 6 \text{ ANDERSON} \quad 01B \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

$$ <52 \qquad 90 \qquad 7 \text{ AFFOLDER} \quad 99B \quad \text{CDF} \quad \text{pp at 1.8 TeV} $$

$$ <100 \qquad 90 \qquad 8 \text{ ABE} \quad 96L \quad \text{CDF} \quad \text{Repl. by AFFOLDER 99B} $$

$$ <2400 \qquad 90 \qquad 9 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 91E \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

$$ <64000 \qquad 90 \qquad 10 \text{ WEIR} \quad 90B \quad \text{MRK2} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to 29 \text{ GeV} $$

$$ <1700 \qquad 90 \qquad 11 \text{ AVERY} \quad 89B \quad \text{CLEO} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

$$ <3800 \qquad 90 \qquad 12 \text{ AVERY} \quad 87 \quad \text{CLEO} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

¹Uses $B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+) = (0.998 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.040) \times 10^{-3}$ for normalization.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Gamma(4S)$.

³Uses $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+ \to \mu^+ \mu^- K^+) = (6.01 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-5}$.

⁴Superseded by CHOUDHURY 21.

⁵Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ at $\Gamma(4S)$. The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.

⁶The result is for di-lepton masses above 0.5 GeV.

⁷AFFOLDER 99B measured relative to $B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+$.

⁸ABE 96L measured relative to $B^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^+$ using PDG 94 branching ratios.

⁹ALBRECHT 91E reports $< 2.2 \times 10^{-4}$ assuming the $\Gamma(4S)$ decays 45% to $B^0 \bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

¹⁰WEIR 90B assumes $B^+$ production cross section from LUND.

¹¹AVERY 89B reports $< 1.5 \times 10^{-4}$ assuming the $\Gamma(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0 \bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

¹²AVERY 87 reports $< 3.2 \times 10^{-4}$ assuming the $\Gamma(4S)$ decays 40% to $B^0 \bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-} \text{nonresonant})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{618}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-7}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 4.37^{+0.15}_{-0.23} \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 17Y \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} $$

¹Measured in amplitude analysis using model including short-distance $K^+ \mu^+ \mu^-$ and $\rho(770)$, $\omega(782)$, $\phi(1020)$, $J/\psi$, $\psi(25)$, $\psi(3770)$, $\psi(4040)$, $\psi(4160)$, and $\psi(4415)$ contributions.

$$ \Gamma(K^{+} \tau^{+} \tau^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{619}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-3}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

¹Uses only leptonic decays of $\tau$ and the quoted limit combines the final states $K^+ e^+ e^-$, $K^+ \mu^+ \mu^-$, and $K^+ e^+ \mu^+ \mu^-$.

²If observed events are interpreted as a signal the branching fraction measurement becomes $(1.31^{+0.66}_{-0.61} \pm 0.35) \times 10^{-3}$.

$$ \Gamma(K^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{617}/\Gamma_{295} $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-3}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

0.444 $\pm 0.034$ OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.7.

0.46 $\pm 0.04 \pm 0.02$ AALTONEN 11AI CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.38 $\pm 0.05 \pm 0.02$ AALTONEN 11L CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI

0.59 $\pm 0.15 \pm 0.03$ AALTONEN 09B CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11L

$$ \Gamma(K^{+} \nu\bar{\nu})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{620}/\Gamma $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

<1.6 $\times 10^{-5}$ 90 1,2 LEES 13I BABR $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<4.1 $\times 10^{-5}$ 90 3 ABUDINEN 21 BEL2 $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

<1.9 $\times 10^{-5}$ 90 1,4 GRYGIER 17 BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

<5.5 $\times 10^{-5}$ 90 1 LUTZ 13 BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

<1.3 $\times 10^{-5}$ 90 1 DEL-AMO-SA10Q BABR Repl. by LEES 13I

<1.4 $\times 10^{-5}$ 90 1 CHEN 07D BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

<5.2 $\times 10^{-5}$ 90 1 AUBERT 05H BABR $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

<2.4 $\times 10^{-5}$ 90 1 BROWDER 01 CLE2 $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Gamma(4S)$.

²Also reported a limit $< 3.7 \times 10^{-5}$ at 90% CL obtained using a fully reconstructed hadronic B-tag events.

³Using an inclusive tagging method that exploits not only the properties of the $B^+ \to K^+ \nu \bar{\nu}$ decay, but also the inclusive properties of the other B meson in the event.

⁴The result was reported in arXiv:1702.03224, but missing from the publication by mistake.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^{+} \nu\bar{\nu})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{621}/\Gamma $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interaction.

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

<3.0 $\times 10^{-5}$ 90 1 GRYGIER 17 BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<2.13 $\times 10^{-4}$ 90 1 LUTZ 13 BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

<1.5 $\times 10^{-4}$ 90 1 CHEN 07D BELL Repl. by LUTZ 13

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Gamma(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(K^{*}(892)^{+} \ell^{+} \ell^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{622}/\Gamma $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-7}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

### 10.1 $\pm 1.1$ OUR AVERAGE

9.24 $\pm 0.93 \pm 0.67$ AAIJ 14M LHCB $\text{pp at 7, 8 TeV}$

14.0 $^{+4.0}_{-3.7} \pm 0.9$ 1 AUBERT 09T BABR $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

12.4 $^{+2.3}_{-2.1} \pm 1.3$ 1 WEI 09A BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

11.6 $\pm 1.9$ 2 AAIJ 12AH LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 14M

7.3 $^{+5.0}_{-4.2} \pm 2.1$ 1 AUBERT, B 06J BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09T

<22 90 1 ISHIKAWA 03 BELL $e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S})$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Gamma(4S)$.

²Measured in $B^+ \to K^*(892)^+ \mu^+ \mu^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^+ e^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{623}/\Gamma $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-7}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

### 15.5 $^{+ 4.0}_{- 3.1}$ OUR AVERAGE

$$ 13.8^{+4.7}_{-4.2} \pm 0.8 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 09T \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$

$$ 17.3^{+5.0}_{-4.2} \pm 2.0 \qquad 1 \text{ WEI} \quad 09A \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(\text{4S}) $$
# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>7.5<sup>+7</sup>/<sub>-6.5</sub> ±3.8</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr><tr><td>2.0<sup>+13.4</sup>/<sub>-8.7</sub> ±2.8</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03U</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 46</td><td>90</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 89</td><td>90</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 95</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>02L</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6900</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

2 Assumes equal production of B$^0$ and B$^+$ at T(4S). The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.

3 ALBRECHT 91E reports $< 6.3 \times 10^{-4}$ assuming the T(4S) decays 45% to B$^0$ B$^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^+\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{624}/\Gamma $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>9.6 ± 1.0 OUR FIT</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>9.6 ± 1.1 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>9.24 ± 0.93 ±0.67</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14M</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>14.6 <sup>+7.9</sup>/<sub>-7.5</sub> ±1.2</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>11.1 <sup>+3.2</sup>/<sub>-2.7</sub> ±1.0</td><td>2</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>11.6 ± 1.9</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14M</td></tr><tr><td>9.7 <sup>+9.4</sup>/<sub>-6.9</sub> ±1.4</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr><tr><td>30.7 <sup>+25.8</sup>/<sub>-17.8</sub> ±4.2</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03U</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>6.5 <sup>+6.9</sup>/<sub>-5.3</sub> ±1.5</td><td>3</td><td>ISHIKAWA</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by WEI 09A</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 39</td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>ABE</td><td>02L</td><td>BELL Repl. by ISHIKAWA 03</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;170</td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>02L</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses B(B$^+ \to J/\psi(1S) K^*(892)^+$) = (1.431±0.027±0.090)×10$^{-3}$ for normalization.

2 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

3 Assumes equal production of B$^0$ and B$^+$ at T(4S). The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence. The 90% C.L. upper limit is 2.2 × 10$^{-6}$.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^+\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^+) \qquad \Gamma_{624}/\Gamma_{300} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.67±0.08 OUR FIT</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>0.67±0.22±0.04</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^+\nu\bar{\nu})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{625}/\Gamma $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interaction.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;4.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup></strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LUTZ</td><td>13 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>GRYGIER</td><td>17 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2</td><td>LEES</td><td>13I BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;8 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BC BABR Repl. by LEES 13I</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.4 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>CHEN</td><td>07D BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

2 Also reported a limit $< 11.6 \times 10^{-5}$ at 90% CL obtained using a fully reconstructed hadronic B-tag evnets.

$$ \Gamma(K^+\pi^+\pi^-\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma(\psi(2S)K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{626}/\Gamma_{330} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6.95<sup>+0.46</sup>/<sub>-0.43</sub> ±0.34</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi K^+\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{627}/\Gamma_{307} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.58<sup>+0.36</sup>/<sub>-0.32</sub> ±0.07</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}p\nu\bar{\nu})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{628}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;3.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup></strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>19C BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Signal candidates are identified by first fully reconstructing B$^+$ in one of many possible exclusive decays to hadronic final states.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+e^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{629}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;0.0064</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>WEIR</td><td>90B MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> 29 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 WEIR 90B assumes B$^+$ production cross section from LUND.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+e^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{630}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;0.0064</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>WEIR</td><td>90B MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> 29 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 WEIR 90B assumes B$^+$ production cross section from LUND.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+e^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{631}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;1.7 × 10<sup>-7</sup></strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AG BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+e^+\tau^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{632}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;74</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>12P BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+e^+\tau^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{633}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;20</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>12P BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+e^+\tau^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{634}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;75</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1,2</td><td>LEES</td><td>12P BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes B(B$^+ \to h^+\ell^+\tau^-$) = B(B$^+ \to h^+\ell^-\tau^+$).

2 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+\mu^+\tau^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{635}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;62</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>12P BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+\mu^-\tau^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{636}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;45</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>12P BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+\mu^+\tau^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{637}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;72</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1,2</td><td>LEES</td><td>12P BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes B(B$^+ \to h^+\ell^+\tau^-$) = B(B$^+ \to h^+\ell^-\tau^+$).

2 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(K^+e^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{638}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;7.0 × 10<sup>-9</sup></strong></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AM LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.0 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td></td><td>CHOUDHURY 21</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.91 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06J BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;8 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>02L BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06J</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.4 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>WEIR</td><td>90B MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> 29 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

2 WEIR 90B assumes B$^+$ production cross section from LUND.

$$ \Gamma(K^+e^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{639}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;6.4 × 10<sup>-9</sup></strong></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AM LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;8.5 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td></td><td>CHOUDHURY 21</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.3 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06J BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.4 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>WEIR</td><td>90B MRK2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> 29 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

2 WEIR 90B assumes B$^+$ production cross section from LUND.

$$ \Gamma(K^+e^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{640}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;0.91</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06J BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^+e^+\tau^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{641}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;1.53 × 10<sup>-5</sup></strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>WATANUKI</td><td>23 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.3 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>LEES</td><td>12P BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B$^-$ decay as a tag on the recoil side.

2 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.
$\Gamma(K^{+}e^{-} \tau^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ642/Γ

Test of lepton family number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.51 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 WATANUKI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.5 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12P</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B$^{-}$ decay as a tag on the recoil side.

2 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.

$\Gamma(K^{+}e^{\pm} \tau^{\mp})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ643/Γ

Test of lepton family number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;30</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12P</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes B(B$^{+}$ → h$^{+}$ℓ$^{+}$τ$^{-}$) = B(B$^{+}$ → h$^{+}$ℓ$^{-}$τ$^{+}$).

2 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.

$\Gamma(K^{+} \mu^{+} \tau^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ644/Γ

Test of lepton family number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.45 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 WATANUKI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<4.5 × 10⁻⁵ 90 2 LEES 12P BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

1 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B$^{-}$ decay as a tag on the recoil side.

2 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.

$\Gamma(K^{+} \mu^{-} \tau^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ645/Γ

Test of lepton family number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.59 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 WATANUKI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<3.9 × 10⁻⁵ 90 2 AAIJ 20P LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

<2.8 × 10⁻⁵ 90 3 LEES 12P BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

1 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B$^{-}$ decay as a tag on the recoil side.

2 Uses the B$^{0}_{S2}$ → B$^{+}$K$^{-}$ decays for kinematic constraints.

3 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.

$\Gamma(K^{+} \mu^{\pm} \tau^{\mp})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ646/Γ

Test of lepton family number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;48</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12P</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<77 90 1 AUBERT 07AZ BABR Repl. by LEES 12P

1 Uses a fully reconstructed hadronic B decay as a tag on the recoil side.

2 Assumes B(B$^{+}$ → h$^{+}$ℓ$^{+}$τ$^{-}$) = B(B$^{+}$ → h$^{+}$ℓ$^{-}$τ$^{+}$).

$\Gamma(K^{*}(892)^{+} e^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ647/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;13</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

$\Gamma(K^{*}(892)^{+} e^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ648/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;9.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

$\Gamma(K^{*}(892)^{+} e^{\pm} \mu^{\pm})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ649/Γ

Test of lepton family number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.4 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<7.9 × 10⁻⁶ 90 1 AUBERT 02L BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06J

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

$\Gamma(\pi^{-} e^{+} e^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ650/Γ

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.3 &times; 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1.6 × 10⁻⁶ 90 1 EDWARDS 02B CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

<0.0039 90 2 WEIR 90B MRK2 e⁺e⁻ 29 GeV

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

2 WEIR 90B assumes B$^{+}$ production cross section from LUND.

$\Gamma(\pi^{-} \mu^{+} \mu^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ651/Γ

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 4.0 &times; 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

< 1.3 × 10⁻⁸ 95 2 AAIJ 12AD LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 14AC

< 4.4 × 10⁻⁸ 95 1 LEES 12J BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

<10.7 × 10⁻⁸ 90 3 LEES 12J BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

< 1.4 × 10⁻⁶ 90 3 EDWARDS 02B CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

< 9.1 × 10⁻³ 90 4 WEIR 90B MRK2 e⁺e⁻ 29 GeV

1 Uses B$^{+}$ → J/ψK$^{+}$, J/ψ → μ$^{+}$μ$^{-}$ mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.4–4.0 × 10⁻⁹. This limit is applicable for Majorana neutrino lifetime < 1 ps.

2 Uses B$^{+}$ → J/ψK$^{+}$, J/ψ → μ$^{+}$μ$^{-}$ mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.4–1.0 × 10⁻⁸.

3 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

4 WEIR 90B assumes B$^{+}$ production cross section from LUND.

$\Gamma(\pi^{-} e^{+} \mu^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ652/Γ

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.5 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1.3 × 10⁻⁶ 90 1 EDWARDS 02B CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

<0.0064 90 2 WEIR 90B MRK2 e⁺e⁻ 29 GeV

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

2 WEIR 90B assumes B$^{+}$ production cross section from LUND.

$\Gamma(\rho^{-} e^{+} e^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ653/Γ

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.17</td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<2.6 90 1 EDWARDS 02B CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

$\Gamma(\rho^{-} \mu^{+} \mu^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ654/Γ

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.42</td><td>90</td><td>LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<5.0 90 1 EDWARDS 02B CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

$\Gamma(\rho^{-} e^{+} \mu^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ655/Γ

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.47</td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<3.3 90 1 EDWARDS 02B CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

$\Gamma(\pi^{-} e^{+} e^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ656/Γ

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.0 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1.0 × 10⁻⁶ 90 1 EDWARDS 02B CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

<0.0039 90 2 WEIR 90B MRK2 e⁺e⁻ 29 GeV

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

2 WEIR 90B assumes B$^{+}$ production cross section from LUND.

$\Gamma(\pi^{-} \mu^{+} \mu^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ657/Γ

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.1 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12C</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<6.7 × 10⁻⁸ 90 1 LEES 12J BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

<1.8 × 10⁻⁶ 90 1 EDWARDS 02B CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

<9.1 × 10⁻³ 90 2 WEIR 90B MRK2 e⁺e⁻ 29 GeV

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

2 WEIR 90B assumes B$^{+}$ production cross section from LUND.

$\Gamma(\pi^{-} e^{+} \mu^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ658/Γ

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<2.0 × 10⁻⁶ 90 1 EDWARDS 02B CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

<0.0064 90 2 WEIR 90B MRK2 e⁺e⁻ 29 GeV

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

2 WEIR 90B assumes B$^{+}$ production cross section from LUND.

$\Gamma(K^{*}(892)^{-} e^{+} e^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ Γ659/Γ

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.40</td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<2.8 90 1 EDWARDS 02B CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(45)

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).
# Meson Particle Listings

B$^{±}$

$$ \Gamma(\mathcal{K}^*(892)^- \mu^+ \mu^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{660} / \Gamma $$

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.59</td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;8.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 EDWARDS</td><td>02B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\mathcal{K}^*(892)^- \mu^+ \mu^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{661} / \Gamma $$

Test of total lepton number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.30</td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 EDWARDS</td><td>02B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(D^- e^+ e^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{662} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.6 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.6 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 SEON</td><td>11</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^0$ and B$^+$ from Ursilon(4S) decays.

²Uses $D^- \to K^+\pi^-\pi^-$ mode and 3-body phase-space hypothesis for the signal decays.

$$ \Gamma(D^- e^+ \mu^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{663} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.8 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 SEON</td><td>11</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^0$ and B$^+$ from Ursilon(4S) decays.

²Uses $D^- \to K^+\pi^-\pi^-$ mode and 3-body phase-space hypothesis for the signal decays.

$$ \Gamma(D^- \mu^+ \mu^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{664} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 6.9 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>12AD LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;17 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>14A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2,3 SEON</td><td>11</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $B^+ \to \psi(2S) K^+$, $\psi(2S) \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ mode for normalization.

²Assumes equal production of B$^0$ and B$^+$ from Ursilon(4S) decays.

³Uses $D^- \to K^+\pi^-\pi^-$ mode and 3-body phase-space hypothesis for the signal decays.

$$ \Gamma(D^- \mu^+ \mu^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{665} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>12AD LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $B^+ \to \psi(2S) K^+$, $\psi(2S) \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ mode for normalization.

$$ \Gamma(D^-_S \mu^+ \mu^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{666} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.8 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>12AD LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $B^+ \to \psi(2S) K^+$, $\psi(2S) \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 1.5-8.0 × 10$^{-7}$.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 \pi^- \mu^+ \mu^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{667} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.5 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>12AD LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $B^+ \to \psi(2S) K^+$, $\psi(2S) \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.3-1.5 × 10$^{-6}$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda^0 \mu^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{668} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..11K</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11k reports < 6.1 × 10$^{-8}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \Lambda^0 \mu^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-) = (63.9 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-) = 64.1 \times 10^{-2}$.

²Uses $B(\Gamma(4S) \to B^0 \bar{B}^0) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\Gamma(4S) \to B^+ \bar{B}^-) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda^0 e^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{669} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.2 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..11K</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11k reports < 3.2 × 10$^{-8}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \Lambda^0 e^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-) = (63.9 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-) = 64.1 \times 10^{-2}$.

²Uses $B(\Gamma(4S) \to B^0 \bar{B}^0) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\Gamma(4S) \to B^+ \bar{B}^-) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda^0 \mu^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{670} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..11K</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11k reports < 6.2 × 10$^{-8}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \Lambda^0 \mu^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-) = (63.9 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-) = 64.1 \times 10^{-2}$.

²Uses $B(\Gamma(4S) \to B^0 \bar{B}^0) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\Gamma(4S) \to B^+ \bar{B}^-) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda^0 e^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{671} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..11K</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11k reports < 8.1 × 10$^{-8}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \Lambda^0 e^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-) = (63.9 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda \to p\pi^-) = 64.1 \times 10^{-2}$.

²Uses $B(\Gamma(4S) \to B^0 \bar{B}^0) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\Gamma(4S) \to B^+ \bar{B}^-) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

## POLARIZATION IN B$^+$ DECAY

In decays involving two vector mesons, one can distinguish among the states in which meson polarizations are both longitudinal (L) or both are transverse and parallel (||) or perpendicular (⊥) to each other with the parameters $\Gamma_L/\Gamma$, $\Gamma_⊥/\Gamma$, and the relative phases $\phi_\parallel$ and $\phi_⊥$. See the definitions in the note on "Polarization in B Decays" review in the B$^0$ Particle Listings.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>L</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>*ρ<sup>+</sup></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.892 ± 0.018 ± 0.016</td><td>CSORNA</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>L</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>*K<sup>+</sup><sup>+</sup></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.86 ± 0.06 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04K</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>L</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>*ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.514 ± 0.018 ± 0.005</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>L</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>*e<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>e</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.505 ± 0.027 ± 0.006</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>L</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>*μ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>μ</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.522 ± 0.025 ± 0.007</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Δ(Γ<sub>L</sub>/Γ) in B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>*ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.017 ± 0.037 ± 0.009</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>L</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>+</sup><sup>+</sup></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.604 ± 0.015 ± 0.018</td><td>ITOH</td><td>05</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>⊥</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>+</sup><sup>+</sup></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.180 ± 0.014 ± 0.010</td><td>ITOH</td><td>05</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>L</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → ωK<sup>+</sup><sup>+</sup></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.41 ± 0.18 ± 0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>L</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → ωK<sup>+</sup><sup>+</sup>(1430)<sup>+</sup></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.56 ± 0.10 ± 0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>L</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup><sup>+</sup>K<sup>0</sup></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.82<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.21</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>0.106 ± 0.30 ± 0.14</th><th>1 GOH</th><th>15</th><th>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.75<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.26</sub> ± 0.03</td><td>2,3 AUBERT</td><td>09F</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Signal significance 2.7 standard deviations.

²Signal significance 3.7 standard deviations.

³Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(45).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>L</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → φK<sup>*(892)</sup><sup>+</sup></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.50 ± 0.05 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BA</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.49 ± 0.05 ± 0.03</td><td>CHEN</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.52 ± 0.08 ± 0.03</td><td>CHEN</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.46 ± 0.12 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03V</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07BA</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ<sub>⊥</sub>/Γ in B<sup>+</sup> → φK<sup>+</sup><sup>+</sup></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.20 ± 0.05 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BA</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.21 ± 0.05 ± 0.02</td><td>CHEN</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.19 ± 0.08 ± 0.02</td><td>CHEN</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>
$\phi_{\parallel} \text{ in } B^{+} \rightarrow \phi K^{*+}$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

2.34±0.18 OUR AVERAGE

$2.47 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.07$

$2.10 \pm 0.28 \pm 0.04$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>CHEN</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\phi_{\perp} \text{ in } B^{+} \rightarrow \phi K^{*+}$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

2.58±0.17 OUR AVERAGE

$2.69 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.03$

$2.31 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.07$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>CHEN</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\delta_0(B^+ \rightarrow \phi K^{*+})$

$\textbf{VALUE (rad)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$3.07 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.06$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_0^{CP}(B^+ \rightarrow \phi K^{*+})$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.17 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.02$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{\perp}^{CP}(B^+ \rightarrow \phi K^{*+})$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.22 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.08$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Delta\phi_{\parallel}(B^+ \rightarrow \phi K^{*+})$

$\textbf{VALUE (rad)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.07 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.05$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Delta\phi_{\perp}(B^+ \rightarrow \phi K^{*+})$

$\textbf{VALUE (rad)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.19 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.07$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Delta\delta_0(B^+ \rightarrow \phi K^{*+})$

$\textbf{VALUE (rad)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.20 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.03$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^+ \rightarrow \phi K_1(1270)^+$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.46^{+0.12}_{-0.07} \pm 0.06$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BI BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^+ \rightarrow \phi K_2(1430)^+$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.80^{+0.09}_{-0.10} \pm 0.03$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BI BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\delta_0(B^+ \rightarrow \phi K_2^*(1430)^+)$

$\textbf{VALUE (rad)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$3.59 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.12$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BI BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Delta\delta_0(B^+ \rightarrow \phi K_2^*(1430)^+)$

$\textbf{VALUE (rad)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$-0.05 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.06$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BI BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^+ \rightarrow \rho^0 K^*(892)^+$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.78 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.03$

$\textbf{DEL-AMO-SA...11D}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$\textbf{BABR} e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$0.96^{+0.04}_{-0.15} \pm 0.04$

$\textbf{AUBERT}$ \quad \textbf{03V BABR} \quad \textbf{Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11D}

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma(B^+ \rightarrow K^*(892)^0 \rho^+)$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.48 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.07$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06G BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>ZHANG</td><td>05D BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$0.52 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.04$

$0.43 \pm 0.11^{+0.05}_{-0.02}$

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^- K^*(892)^+ (1.0 < q^2 < 8.68 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.60^{+0.31}_{-0.25} \pm 0.13$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21AC CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 SIRUNYAN 21AC measurement is performed in 1.0 < q² < 8.68 GeV²/c⁴. Reports also measurements in several other q² intervals.

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^- K^*(892)^+ (1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.59 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.03$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21J LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the q². The measured ΓL is related to the polarisation of the K*(892)⁺.

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^- K^*(892)^+ (10.09 < q^2 < 12.86 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.88^{+0.10}_{-0.13} \pm 0.05$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21AC CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 SIRUNYAN 21AC measurement is performed in 10.09 < q² < 12.86 GeV²/c⁴. Reports also measurements in several other q² intervals.

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^- K^*(892)^+ (14.18 < q^2 < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.55^{+0.13}_{-0.10} \pm 0.06$

$1 \text{ SIRUNYAN} \quad 21\text{AC CMS}$ \quad \text{pp at 8 TeV}

1 SIRUNYAN 21AC measurement is performed in 14.18 < q² < 19.0 GeV²/c⁴. Reports also measurements in several other q² intervals.

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^- K^*(892)^+ (15.0 < q^2 < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.40^{+0.13}_{-0.11} \pm 0.03$

$1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 21\text{J LHCB}$ \quad \text{pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV}

1 The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the q². The measured ΓL is related to the polarisation of the K*(892)⁺.

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^+ \rightarrow \rho^+ \rho^0$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.950 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.006$

$\textbf{AUBERT}$ \quad \textbf{09G BABR}$ \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S)$

$0.948 \pm 0.106 \pm 0.021$

$\textbf{ZHANG}$ \quad \textbf{03B BELL}$ \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$0.905 \pm 0.042^{+0.023}_{-0.027}$

$\textbf{AUBERT,BE}$ \quad \textbf{06G BABR}$ \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 09G}$

$0.97^{+0.03}_{-0.07} \pm 0.04$

$\textbf{AUBERT}$ \quad \textbf{03V BABR}$ \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT,BE 06G}$

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^+ \rightarrow \omega \rho^+$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.90 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.03$

$\textbf{AUBERT}$ \quad \textbf{09H BABR}$ \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$0.82 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.02$

$\textbf{AUBERT,B}$ \quad \textbf{06T BABR}$ \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 09H}$

$0.88^{+0.12}_{-0.15} \pm 0.03$

$\textbf{AUBERT}$ \quad \textbf{05O BABR}$ \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT,B 06T}$

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^+ \rightarrow \rho p K^*(892)^+$

$\textbf{VALUE (°)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

$0.32 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.09$

$\textbf{CHEN}$ \quad \textbf{08C BELL}$ \quad e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(4S)$

CP VIOLATION

$A_{CP}$ is defined as

$\frac{B(B^{-} \rightarrow \bar{T}) - B(B^{+} \rightarrow f)}{B(B^{-} \rightarrow f) + B(B^{+} \rightarrow \bar{f})}$

the CP-violation charge asymmetry of exclusive B⁻ and B⁺ decay.

$A_{CP}(B^+ \rightarrow J/\psi(1S) K^+)$

$\textbf{VALUE (units $10^{-3}$)}$ \quad \textbf{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \textbf{TECN} \quad \textbf{COMMENT}

1.8±3.0 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17AP LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>13M D0</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>SAKAI</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1 WEI</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3 BONVICINI</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$7.5 \pm 6.1 \pm 3.0$

$4 \text{ ABAZOV}$ \quad \text{08O D0}$ \quad \text{Repl. by ABAZOV 13M}$

$30 \pm 15 \pm 6$

$04P BABR$ \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 05J}$

$-26 \pm 22 \pm 17$

$03B BELL$ \quad \text{Repl. by SAKAI 10}$

$3 \pm 30 \pm 4$

$02F BABR$ \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 04P}$

1 Uses $B^+ \rightarrow J/\psi K^+$, where $J/\psi \rightarrow p\bar{p}$.

2 The result reported corresponds to $-A_{CP}$.

3 A + 0.3% correction is applied due to a slightly higher reconstruction efficiency for the positive kaons.

4 Uses $J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.8±3.0 (Error scaled by 1.5)

<figure><img src="image_587.png" /></figure>

(Confidence Level = 0.116)

$A_{CP}(B^+ \rightarrow J/\psi(1S) K^+)$ (units $10^{-3}$)
# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψ(1S)π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.8 ± 1.2</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.3.</td></tr><tr><td>1.91 ± 0.89 ± 0.16</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17O LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>- 4.2 ± 4.4 ± 0.9</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>13M D0</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>12.3 ± 8.5 ± 0.4</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04P BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>- 2.3 ± 16.4 ± 1.5</td><td>ABE</td><td>03B BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.5 ± 2.7 ± 1.1</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>12AC LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 17O</td></tr><tr><td>- 9 ± 8 ± 3</td><td>3 ABAZOV</td><td>08O D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 13M</td></tr><tr><td>1 ± 22 ± 1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>02F BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 04P</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Obtained by using LHCb measurement of A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>+</sup>) = (0.09 ± 0.27 ± 0.07) × 10<sup>-2</sup> of AAIJ 17AP.

² Uses A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>+</sup>) = 0.001 ± 0.007 to extract production asymmetry.

³ Uses J/ψ → μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup> decay.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψρ<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.05 ± 0.05</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.2.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.045<sup>+0.056</sup><sub>-0.057</sub> ± 0.008</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19O LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.11 ± 0.12 ± 0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AC BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.048 ± 0.029 ± 0.016</strong></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The result reported corresponds to -A<sub>CP</sub>.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → η<sub>c</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.01 ± 0.07</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.2.</td></tr><tr><td>0.040 ± 0.034 ± 0.004</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AF LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.16 ± 0.08 ± 0.02</td><td>1 WEI</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.046 ± 0.057 ± 0.007</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AU LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14AF</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">¹ Uses B<sup>+</sup> → η<sub>c</sub>K<sup>+</sup>, where η<sub>c</sub> → p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span>.</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ψ(2S)π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.03 ± 0.06</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>0.048 ± 0.090 ± 0.011</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>12AC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.022 ± 0.085 ± 0.016</td><td>BHARDWAJ</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ψ(2S)K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.012 ± 0.020</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>0.092 ± 0.058 ± 0.004</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AF LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.024 ± 0.014 ± 0.008</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>12AC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.052 ± 0.059 ± 0.020</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>05J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.042 ± 0.020 ± 0.017</td><td>ABE</td><td>03B BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.02 ± 0.091 ± 0.01</td><td>3 BONVICINI</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.002 ± 0.123 ± 0.012</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>13AU LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14AF</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses ψ(2S) → p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> decays.

² Uses A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → J/ψK<sup>+</sup>) = 0.001 ± 0.007 to extract production asymmetry.

³ A + 0.3% correction is applied due to a slightly higher reconstruction efficiency for the positive kaons.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.012±0.020 (Error scaled by 1.5)

<figure><img src="image_588.png" /></figure>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → ψ(2S)K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.077 ± 0.207 ± 0.051</strong></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The result reported corresponds to -A<sub>CP</sub>.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → χ<sub>c1</sub>(1P)π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.07 ± 0.18 ± 0.02</strong></td><td>KUMAR</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → χ<sub>c0</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.20 ± 0.18</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.96 ± 0.37 ± 0.04</td><td>LEES</td><td>11I BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.14 ± 0.15<sup>+0.03</sup><sub>-0.06</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AI BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.065 ± 0.20<sup>+0.035</sup><sub>-0.024</sub></td><td>GARMASH</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
-0.20±0.18 (Error scaled by 1.5)

<figure><img src="image_589.png" /></figure>

(Confidence Level = 0.093)

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → χ<sub>c0</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → χ<sub>c1</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.009 ± 0.033</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.01 ± 0.03 ± 0.02</td><td>KUMAR</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.003 ± 0.076 ± 0.017</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The result reported corresponds to -A<sub>CP</sub>.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → χ<sub>c1</sub>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.471 ± 0.378 ± 0.268</strong></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The result reported corresponds to -A<sub>CP</sub>.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.14 ± 0.14 ± 0.14</strong></td><td>1 ABAZOV</td><td>17A D0</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses D<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> decays and t(B<sup>+</sup>) = 0.56 ± 0.01 from 10.4 fb<sup>-1</sup> of Run II data.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-3 ± 5</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>1.9 ± 3.6 ± 5.7</td><td>BLOOMFIELD</td><td>22 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-6 ± 5 ± 10</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AE LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-8 ± 8</td><td>ABE</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses B<sup>±</sup> → [K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>±</sup>π<sup>±</sup>]D h<sup>±</sup> mode.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → D<sub>CP</sub>(+1)π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.0080 ± 0.0024</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.008 ± 0.002 ± 0.002</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.0098 ± 0.0043 ± 0.0021</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16L LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.035 ± 0.024</td><td>ABE</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.008 ± 0.003 ± 0.002</td><td>2,3 AAIJ</td><td>18A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.008 ± 0.006 ± 0.002</td><td>3,4 AAIJ</td><td>18A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses D → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> and D → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decay modes.

² Uses D → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> decay mode.

³ Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

⁴ Uses D → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decay mode.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → D<sub>CP</sub>(-1)π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.017 ± 0.026</strong></td><td>ABE</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
A<sub>CP</sub>([K<sup>‡</sup>π<sup>±</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.070±0.019±0.006</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23i</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.023±0.048±0.005</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16l</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.13 ± 0.10</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AE</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Superseded by AAIJ 23i.

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.061±0.013±0.002</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.100±0.034±0.018</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16l</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Superseded by AAIJ 23N.

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>*</sup>(892<sup>+</sup>))

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.02±0.11±0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17B0</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.095±0.023±0.002</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.009±0.006±0.001</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">-0.017 ± 0.005 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.019 ± 0.005 ± 0.002</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.0194 ± 0.0072 ± 0.0060</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.010 ± 0.026 ± 0.005</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>15W</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.066 ± 0.036</td><td>ABE</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.000 ± 0.012 ± 0.002</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.029 ± 0.020 ± 0.018</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>13AE</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr><tr><td>0.003 ± 0.080 ± 0.037</td><td>4 ABE</td><td>03D</td><td>BELL Repl. by SWAIN 03</td></tr><tr><td>0.04 ± 0.06 ± 0.03</td><td>5 SWAIN</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by ABE 06</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Superseded by AAIJ 16L.

²Uses D<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> for the favored mode, and D<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> for the suppressed mode.

³Uses B<sup>±</sup> → [K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub>h<sup>±</sup> mode.

⁴Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.15 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.16.

⁵Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.07 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.15.

A<sub>CP</sub>([K<sup>‡</sup>π<sup>±</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.321±0.039±0.005</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23i</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-0.313±0.102±0.038</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16l</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.42 ± 0.22</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AE</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Superseded by AAIJ 23i.

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-8.2±3.1±0.7</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-4.1±7.9±2.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16l</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Superseded by AAIJ 23N.

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.58±0.21 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.82±0.44±0.09</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AJ</td><td>CDF p&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.39<sup>+0.26</sup><sub>-0.28</sub>±0.04</td><td>HORII</td><td>11</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.86±0.47<sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.16</sub></td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..10H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.1<sup>+0.8</sup><sub>-1.0</sub> ± 0.4</td><td>HORII</td><td>08</td><td>BELL Repl. by HORII 11</td></tr><tr><td>+0.88<sup>+0.77</sup><sub>-0.62</sub> ± 0.06</td><td>SAIGO</td><td>05</td><td>BELL Repl. by HORII 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.27±0.27 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.4.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.38±0.12±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.41±0.30±0.05</td><td>NAYAK</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.20±0.27±0.04</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15W</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 22T</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.024±0.013±0.002</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.067±0.073±0.003</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.30 ± 0.20 ± 0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15W</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 22T</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">1 Uses D → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> mode.</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.109±0.043±0.003</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.054±0.091±0.011</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15W</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 22T</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">1 Uses D → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> mode.</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>K<sup>*</sup>(892<sup>+</sup>))

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">-0.007±0.019 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.004±0.023±0.008</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17B0</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.013±0.031±0.009</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>17B0</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses B<sup>±</sup> → [K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>∓</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>*</sup>(892<sup>±</sup>) decay mode.

²Uses B<sup>±</sup> → [K<sup>±</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>*</sup>(892<sup>±</sup>) decay mode.

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>*</sup>(892<sup>+</sup>))

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">-0.75±0.16 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.81±0.17±0.04</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17B0</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.34±0.43±0.16</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AJ</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.22±0.61±0.17</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05V</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AJ</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub>K<sup>*</sup>(892<sup>+</sup>))

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.45±0.21±0.14</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17B0</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">0.00±0.09 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.13±0.25±0.02</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AJ</td><td>CDF p&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.04±0.11<sup>+0.02</sup><sub>-0.01</sub></td><td>HORII</td><td>11</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.03±0.17±0.04</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..10H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.02<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.16</sub> ± 0.04</td><td>HORII</td><td>08</td><td>BELL Repl. by HORII 11</td></tr><tr><td>+0.30<sup>+0.29</sup><sub>-0.25</sub> ± 0.06</td><td>SAIGO</td><td>05</td><td>BELL Repl. by HORII 08</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>]<sub>D</sub>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">0.08 ± 0.09 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.069±0.094±0.016</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.16 ± 0.27<sup>+0.03</sup><sub>-0.04</sub></td><td>NAYAK</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.438±0.190±0.011</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15W</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 22T</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses D<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup> for the favored mode, and D<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> for the suppressed mode.

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>]<sub>D</sub>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.001±0.019±0.002</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-0.030±0.040±0.005</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15W</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 22T</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses D → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup> mode.

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>]<sub>D</sub>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.001±0.010±0.002</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.016±0.020±0.004</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15W</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 22T</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">1 Uses D → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> mode.</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.09±0.27±0.05</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..10H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>+</sup> → [K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub>π<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.65±0.55±0.22</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..10H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

$B^{\pm}$

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{(D\pi)} K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.77±0.35±0.12</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..10H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{(D\gamma)} K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.36±0.94<sup>+0.25</sup><sub>-0.41</sub></td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..10H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}]_{D} K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.02±0.15±0.03</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07BJ</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.02±0.16±0.03</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05T</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07BJ</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">1 Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of D<sup>0</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>. Also reports the one-sigma regions: 0.06 &lt; r<sub>B</sub> &lt; 0.78, -30° &lt; γ &lt; 76°, and -27° &lt; δ &lt; 78°.</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{0}_{S} K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D} K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.00 ±0.09 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.4.</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.089±0.091±0.011</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>23L</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.095±0.089±0.018</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>20N</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.040±0.091±0.018</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14V</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20N</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The analysis uses all of D → K⁰S Kπ Dalitz decays.

2 The analysis uses D → K⁰S Kπ Dalitz decays with K*−K⁺ region excluded.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{0}_{S} K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D} K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.00 ±0.07 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.109±0.133±0.013</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>23L</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.038±0.075±0.011</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>20N</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.233±0.129±0.024</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14V</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20N</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The analysis uses all of D → K⁰S Kπ Dalitz decays.

2 The analysis uses D → K⁰S Kπ Dalitz decays with K*−K⁺ region excluded.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{0}_{S} K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D} \pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.003±0.014 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.028±0.031±0.009</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>23L</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.003±0.015±0.003</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>20N</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.052±0.029±0.017</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14V</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20N</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The analysis uses all of D → K⁰S Kπ Dalitz decays.

2 The analysis uses D → K⁰S Kπ Dalitz decays with K*−K⁺ region excluded.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{0}_{S} K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D} \pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.016±0.025 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5.</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.018±0.026±0.009</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>23L</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.034±0.020±0.003</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>20N</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.025±0.024±0.010</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14V</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20N</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The analysis uses all of D → K⁰S Kπ Dalitz decays.

2 The analysis uses D → K⁰S Kπ Dalitz decays with K*−K⁺ region excluded.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{*}(892)^{-} K^{+}]_{D} K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.08 ±0.05 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.055±0.119±0.020</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>23L</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.084±0.049±0.008</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20N</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.026±0.109±0.029</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14V</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20N</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The Analysis uses D → K* (892) K → K⁰S Kπ decays.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{*}(892)^{+} K^{-}]_{D} K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.07 ±0.09 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.231±0.184±0.014</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>23L</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.021±0.094±0.017</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20N</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.336±0.208±0.026</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14V</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20N</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The Analysis uses D → K* (892) K → K⁰S Kπ decays.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{*}(892)^{+} K^{-}]_{D} \pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.007±0.016 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.009±0.046±0.009</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>23L</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.007±0.017±0.003</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20N</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.054±0.043±0.017</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14V</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20N</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The Analysis uses D → K* (892) K → K⁰S Kπ decays.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{*}(892)^{-} K^{+}]_{D} \pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.013±0.020 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.9.</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.046±0.029±0.016</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>23L</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.020±0.011±0.003</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20N</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.012±0.028±0.010</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14V</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20N</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The Analysis uses D → K* (892) K → K⁰S Kπ decays.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to D_{CP}(+1) K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.132±0.015 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.8.</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.136±0.009±0.001</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.097±0.018±0.009</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.39±0.17±0.04</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>10A</td><td>CDF</td><td>pP at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.25±0.06±0.02</td><td>2 DEL-AMO-SA..10G</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.06±0.14±0.05</td><td>ABE</td><td>06</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.126±0.014±0.002</td><td>3.4 AAIJ</td><td>18A</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.115±0.025±0.007</td><td>4.5 AAIJ</td><td>18A</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.145±0.032±0.010</td><td>6 AAIJ</td><td>12M</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr><tr><td>0.27±0.09±0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AA</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10G</td></tr><tr><td>0.35±0.13±0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AA</td></tr><tr><td>0.07±0.17±0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04N</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 06J</td></tr><tr><td>0.29±0.26±0.05</td><td>7 ABE</td><td>03D</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by SWAIN 03</td></tr><tr><td>0.06±0.19±0.04</td><td>8 SWAIN</td><td>03</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 06</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses D → K⁺K⁻ and D → π⁺π⁻ decay modes.

2 Reports the first evidence for direct CP violation in B → DK decays with 3.6 standard deviations.

3 Uses D → K⁺K⁻ decay mode.

4 Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

5 Uses D → π⁺π⁻ decay mode.

6 AAIJ 12M reports an evidence of direct CP violation in B± → DK± decays with a total significance of 5.8 σ.

7 Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.14 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.73.

8 Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.26 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.38.

$A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to DK^{+})$

$A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to DK^{+}) = \frac{(R_{\pi}^{-} - R_{K}^{+})}{(R_{K}^{-} + R_{K}^{+})}$ where

$R_{K}^{-} = \Gamma(B^{-} \to [K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D} K^{-}) / \Gamma(B^{-} \to [K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D} K^{-})$ and

$R_{K}^{+} = \Gamma(B^{+} \to [K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D} K^{+}) / \Gamma(B^{+} \to [K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D} K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.451±0.026</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.403±0.056±0.011</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.52±0.15±0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>12M</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the R<sub>π</sub><sup>-</sup> and R<sub>K</sub><sup>+</sup> observables.

2 Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

$A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to D\pi^{+})$

$A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to D\pi^{+}) = \frac{(R_{\pi}^{-} - R_{K}^{+})}{(R_{K}^{-} + R_{K}^{+})}$ where

$R_{K}^{-} = \Gamma(B^{-} \to [K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D} K^{-}) / \Gamma(B^{-} \to [K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D} K^{-})$ and

$R_{K}^{+} = \Gamma(B^{+} \to [K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D} K^{+}) / \Gamma(B^{+} \to [K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D} K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.129±0.014</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.100±0.031±0.009</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>16L</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.143±0.062±0.011</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>12M</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 16L</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the R<sub>π</sub><sup>-</sup> and R<sub>K</sub><sup>+</sup> observables.

2 Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

$A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to D^{*}(D\gamma) K^{+})$

$A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to D^{*}(D\gamma) K^{+}) = (R_{K}^{-} - R_{K}^{+}) / (R_{K}^{-} + R_{K}^{+})$, where

$R_{K}^{-} = \Gamma(B^{-} \to (\gamma[K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D})_{D^{*} K^{-}}) / \Gamma(B^{-} \to (\gamma[K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D})_{D^{*} K^{-}})$ and

$R_{K}^{+} = \Gamma(B^{+} \to (\gamma[K^{-} \pi^{+}]_{D})_{D^{*} K^{+}}) / \Gamma(B^{+} \to (\gamma[K^{+} \pi^{-}]_{D})_{D^{*} K^{+}})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.558±1.349</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the R<sub>K</sub><sup>-</sup> and R<sub>K</sub><sup>+</sup> observables.
$A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to D^{*}(D\pi^{0})K^{+})$

$$
\begin{align*}
A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to D^{*}(D\pi^{0})K^{+}) &= (R_{K}^{-} - R_{K}^{+}) / (R_{K}^{-} + R_{K}^{+}), \text{ where} \\
R_{K}^{-} &= \Gamma(B^{-} \to ([K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}\pi^{0})D_{*}K^{-}) / \Gamma(B^{-} \to ([K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}\pi^{0})D_{*}K^{-}) \text{ and} \\
R_{K}^{+} &= \Gamma(B^{+} \to ([K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}\pi^{0})D_{*}K^{+}) / \Gamma(B^{+} \to ([K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}\pi^{0})D_{*}K^{+})
\end{align*}
$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.717±0.286</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the $R_K^-$ and $R_K^+$ observables.

$A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to D^{*}(D\gamma)\pi^{+})$

$$
\begin{align*}
A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to D^{*}(D\gamma)\pi^{+}) &= (R_{\pi}^{-} - R_{\pi}^{+}) / (R_{\pi}^{-} + R_{\pi}^{+}), \text{ where} \\
R_{\pi}^{-} &= \Gamma(B^{-} \to (\gamma[K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D})D_{*}\pi^{-}) / \Gamma(B^{-} \to (\gamma[K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D})D_{*}\pi^{-}) \text{ and} \\
R_{\pi}^{+} &= \Gamma(B^{+} \to (\gamma[K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D})D_{*}\pi^{+}) / \Gamma(B^{+} \to (\gamma[K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D})D_{*}\pi^{+})
\end{align*}
$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.079±0.128</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the $R_{\pi}^-$ and $R_{\pi}^+$ observables.

$A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to D^{*}(D\pi^{0})\pi^{+})$

$$
\begin{align*}
A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to D^{*}(D\pi^{0})\pi^{+}) &= (R_{\pi}^{-} - R_{\pi}^{+}) / (R_{\pi}^{-} + R_{\pi}^{+}), \text{ where} \\
R_{\pi}^{-} &= \Gamma(B^{-} \to ([K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D})D_{*}\pi^{-}) / \Gamma(B^{-} \to ([K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D})D_{*}\pi^{-}) \text{ and} \\
R_{\pi}^{+} &= \Gamma(B^{+} \to ([K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D})D_{*}\pi^{+}) / \Gamma(B^{+} \to ([K^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D})D_{*}\pi^{+})
\end{align*}
$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.140±0.059</strong></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the $R_{\pi}^-$ and $R_{\pi}^+$ observables.

$A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to [K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.33<sup>+0.36</sup><sub>-0.34</sub></strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{ADS}(B^{+} \to [K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.013±0.087</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to D_{CP}(-1)K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.10±0.07 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.09±0.07±0.02</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..10G</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.12±0.14±0.05</td><td>ABE</td><td>06</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.09±0.09±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AA BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10G</td></tr><tr><td>-0.06±0.13±0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06J BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AA</td></tr><tr><td>-0.22±0.24±0.04</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>03D BELL</td><td>Repl. by SWAIN 03</td></tr><tr><td>-0.19±0.17±0.05</td><td>2 SWAIN</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 06</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.62 < A_{CP} < 0.18$.

2. Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.47 < A_{CP} < 0.11$.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{+}K^{-}]_{D}K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.045±0.064±0.011</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [\pi^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.054±0.101±0.011</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.013±0.019±0.013</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{+}K^{-}]_{D}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.019±0.011±0.010</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [\pi^{+}\pi^{-}]_{D}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.013±0.016±0.010</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to [K^{-}\pi^{+}]_{D}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.002±0.003±0.011</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15BC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to D^{*0}\pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.0004±0.0021 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.004 ± 0.004 ± 0.001</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.001 ± 0.002 ± 0.001</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.014 ± 0.015</td><td>ABE</td><td>06</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.000 ± 0.006 ± 0.001</td><td>1,3 AAIJ</td><td>18A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.002 ± 0.003 ± 0.001</td><td>2,3 AAIJ</td><td>18A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses $D^{*0} \to D^{0}\gamma$ decay mode.

2. Uses $D^{*0} \to D^{0}\pi^{0}$ decay mode.

3. Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to D_{CP}^{*0}(+1)\pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.010±0.007 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.000 ± 0.014 ± 0.006</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.013 ± 0.007 ± 0.003</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.021 ± 0.045</td><td>ABE</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.003 ± 0.017 ± 0.002</td><td>1,3 AAIJ</td><td>18A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.025 ± 0.010 ± 0.003</td><td>2,3 AAIJ</td><td>18A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses $D^{*0} \to D^{0}\gamma$ decay mode.

2. Uses $D^{*0} \to D^{0}\pi^{0}$ decay mode.

3. Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to D_{CP}^{*0}(-1)\pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.090±0.051</strong></td><td>ABE</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to D^{*0}K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.012±0.010 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.004 ± 0.014 ± 0.003</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.020 ± 0.007 ± 0.003</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.06 ± 0.04 ± 0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BF BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.089 ± 0.086</td><td>ABE</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.001 ± 0.021 ± 0.007</td><td>1,3 AAIJ</td><td>18A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.006 ± 0.012 ± 0.004</td><td>2,3 AAIJ</td><td>18A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses $D^{*0} \to D^{0}\gamma$ decay mode.

2. Uses $D^{*0} \to D^{0}\pi^{0}$ decay mode.

3. Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to D_{CP}^{*0}(+1)K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.09 ± 0.05 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.6. See the ideogram below.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.123 ± 0.054 ± 0.031</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.115 ± 0.019 ± 0.009</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>21Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.11 ± 0.09 ± 0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BF BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.20 ± 0.22 ± 0.04</td><td>ABE</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.276 ± 0.094 ± 0.047</td><td>1,3 AAIJ</td><td>18A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.151 ± 0.033 ± 0.011</td><td>2,3 AAIJ</td><td>18A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.10 ± 0.23 <sup>+0.03</sup><sub>-0.04</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>05N BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BF</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses $D^{*0} \to D^{0}\gamma$ decay mode.

2. Uses $D^{*0} \to D^{0}\pi^{0}$ decay mode.

3. Superseded by AAIJ 21Q.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
-0.09±0.05 (Error scaled by 2.6)

<figure><img src="image_590.png" /></figure>

(Confidence Level = 0.0014)

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to D_{CP}^{*0}(+1)K^{+})$

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to D_{CP}^{*0}(-1)K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.07±0.10 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>+0.06±0.10±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BF BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>+0.13±0.30±0.08</td><td>ABE</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B$^{\pm}$

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow D_{CP}(+1) K^{*}(892)^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.08 ± 0.06</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.08 ± 0.06 ± 0.01</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17B0 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.09 ± 0.13 ± 0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AJ</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.08 ± 0.19 ± 0.08</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>05U</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT</td><td>09AJ</td></tr></table>

¹Measures the asymmetry separately for $K^{+}K^{-}$ and $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ final states, $A(KK) = 0.06 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.01$ and $A(\pi\pi) = 0.15 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.01$, and combines the two results. The value of $A(\pi\pi)$ was updated in AAIJ 18x.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow D_{CP}(-1) K^{*}(892)^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.23 ± 0.21 ± 0.07</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AJ</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.26 ± 0.40 ± 0.12</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>05U</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT</td><td>09AJ</td></tr></table>

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow D_{s}^{+} \phi)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.01 ± 0.41 ± 0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13R</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow D_{s}^{+} \bar{D}^{0})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.5 ± 0.2 ± 0.6</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AX</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.4 ± 0.5 ± 0.5</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18W</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ</td><td>23AX</td></tr></table>

¹The last error includes the uncertainty from $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+})$.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow D_{s}^{*+} \bar{D}^{0})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.5 ± 1.1 ± 1.0</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AX</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The last error includes the uncertainty from $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+})$.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow D_{s}^{+} \bar{D}^{*0})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.1 ± 0.8 ± 0.7</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AX</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The last error includes the uncertainty from $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+})$.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow D^{*+} \bar{D}^{*0})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.3 ± 2.6 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.3 ± 2.1 ± 1.7</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AX</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-15 ± 11 ± 2</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The last error includes the uncertainty from $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+})$.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow D^{*+} \bar{D}^{0})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.1 ± 1.7 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.3 ± 1.6 ± 0.7</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AX</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-6 ± 13 ± 2</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The last error includes the uncertainty from $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+})$.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow D^{+} \bar{D}^{*0})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0 ± 2.4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.2 ± 2.0 ± 1.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AX</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>13 ± 18 ± 4</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The last error includes the uncertainty from $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+})$.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow D^{+} \bar{D}^{0})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.4 ± 1.1 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.5 ± 1.0 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AX</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0 ± 8 ± 2</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-13 ± 14 ± 2</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.3 ± 2.7 ± 0.4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18W</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ</td><td>23AX</td></tr></table>

¹The last error includes the uncertainty from $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+})$.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow K_{s}^{0} \pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.003 ± 0.015 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.046 ± 0.029 ± 0.007</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>24</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.022 ± 0.025 ± 0.010</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13BS</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.011 ± 0.021 ± 0.006</td><td>DUH</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.029 ± 0.039 ± 0.010</td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>06C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.18 ± 0.24</td><td>2 CHEN</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.03 ± 0.03 ± 0.01</td><td>LIN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr><tr><td>-0.09 ± 0.05 ± 0.01</td><td>3 AUBERT, BE</td><td>05E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, BE 06C</td></tr><tr><td>0.05 ± 0.05 ± 0.01</td><td>4 CHAO</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIN 07</td></tr><tr><td>-0.05 ± 0.08 ± 0.01</td><td>5 AUBERT</td><td>04M</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, BE 05E</td></tr><tr><td>0.07 ± 0.09 ± 0.01</td><td>6 UNNO</td><td>03</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHAO 05A</td></tr><tr><td>-0.08 ± 0.03</td><td>7 CASEY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by UNNO 03</td></tr><tr><td>0.46 ± 0.15 ± 0.02</td><td>8 ABE</td><td>01K</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by CASEY 02</td></tr><tr><td>0.098 ± 0.430 ± 0.020</td><td>9 AUBERT</td><td>01E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 04M</td></tr><tr><td>-0.343 ± 0.063</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.21 ± 0.18 ± 0.03</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.092 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.036.

²Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.22 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.56.

³Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.16 < $A_{CP}$ < -0.02.

⁴Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.04 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.13.

⁵Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.18 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.08.

⁶Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.10 < $A_{CP}$ < +0.22.

⁷Corresponds to 90% confidence range +0.19 < $A_{CP}$ < +0.72.

⁸Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.53 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.82.

⁹Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.51 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.09.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+} \pi^{0})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.027 ± 0.012 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.013 ± 0.027 ± 0.005</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>24</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.025 ± 0.015 ± 0.007</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21H</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.043 ± 0.024 ± 0.002</td><td>DUH</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.030 ± 0.039 ± 0.010</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BC</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.29 ± 0.23</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.07 ± 0.03 ± 0.01</td><td>LIN</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr><tr><td>0.06 ± 0.06 ± 0.01</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05L</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07BC</td></tr><tr><td>0.06 ± 0.06 ± 0.02</td><td>2 CHAO</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHAO 04B</td></tr><tr><td>0.04 ± 0.05 ± 0.02</td><td>3 CHAO</td><td>04B</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIN 08</td></tr><tr><td>-0.09 ± 0.09 ± 0.01</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>03L</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05L</td></tr><tr><td>-0.02 ± 0.19 ± 0.02</td><td>5 CASEY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHAO 04B</td></tr><tr><td>-0.059 ± 0.222 ± 0.055</td><td>6 ABE</td><td>01K</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by CASEY 02</td></tr><tr><td>-0.196 ± 0.017</td><td>7 AUBERT</td><td>01E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 03L</td></tr><tr><td>0.00 ± 0.18 ± 0.04</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.67 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.09.

²Corresponds to a 90% CL interval of -0.06 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.18.

³Corresponds to 90% CL interval of -0.05 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.13.

⁴Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.24 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.06.

⁵Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.35 < $A_{CP}$ < +0.30.

⁶Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.40 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.36.

⁷Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.30 < $A_{CP}$ < +0.30.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow \eta' K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.004 ± 0.011 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.002 ± 0.012 ± 0.006</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15O</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.008 ± 0.017 ± 0.009</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AV</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.028 ± 0.028 ± 0.021</td><td>SCHUEMANN</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.03 ± 0.12</td><td>2 CHEN</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.010 ± 0.022 ± 0.006</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AE</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT</td><td>09AV</td></tr><tr><td>0.033 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>05M</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT</td><td>07AE</td></tr><tr><td>0.037 ± 0.045 ± 0.011</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>03W</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT</td><td>05M</td></tr><tr><td>-0.11 ± 0.11 ± 0.02</td><td>5 AUBERT</td><td>02E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT</td><td>05M</td></tr><tr><td>-0.015 ± 0.070 ± 0.009</td><td>6 CHEN</td><td>02B</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by SCHUEMANN</td><td>06</td></tr><tr><td>0.06 ± 0.15 ± 0.01</td><td>7 ABE</td><td>01M</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHEN</td><td>02B</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtained using $A_{CP}(B^{\pm} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{\pm}) = (0.3 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-2}$.

²Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.17 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.23.

³Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.012 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.078.

⁴Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.04 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.11.

⁵Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.28 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.07.

⁶Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.13 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.10.

⁷Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.20 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.32.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow \eta' K^{*}(892)^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.26 ± 0.27 ± 0.02</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.30 + 0.33<br>-0.37 + 0.02</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10A</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Reports $A_{CP}$ with the opposite sign convention.

### $A_{CP}(B^{+} \rightarrow \eta' K_{0}^{*}(1430)^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.06 ± 0.20 ± 0.02</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to \eta' K_{2}^{*}(1430)^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.15±0.13±0.02</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA..10A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to \eta K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">-0.37±0.08 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.38±0.11±0.01</td><td>HOI</td><td>12</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.36±0.11±0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AV</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-0.22±0.11±0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AE</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.39±0.16±0.03</td><td>CHANG</td><td>07B</td><td>BELL Repl. by HOI 12</td></tr><tr><td>-0.20±0.15±0.01</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05K</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07AE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.49±0.31±0.07</td><td>CHANG</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHANG 07B</td></tr><tr><td>-0.52±0.24±0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04H</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 05K</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to \eta K^{*}(892)^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">0.02±0.06 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.03±0.10±0.01</td><td>WANG</td><td>07B</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.01±0.08±0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.13±0.14±0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>04D</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 06H</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to \eta K_{0}^{*}(1430)^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.05±0.13±0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to \eta K_{2}^{*}(1430)^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.45±0.30±0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to \omega K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">-0.02±0.04 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03±0.04±0.01</td><td>CHOBANOVA</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.01±0.07±0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AE</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.05±0.09±0.01</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06E</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07AE</td></tr><tr><td>0.05<sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.07</sub>±0.01</td><td>JEN</td><td>06</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHOBANOVA 14</td></tr><tr><td>-0.09±0.17±0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04H</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 06E</td></tr><tr><td>0.06<sup>+0.21</sup><sub>-0.18</sub>±0.01</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>04A</td><td>BELL Repl. by JEN 06</td></tr><tr><td>-0.21±0.28±0.03</td><td>2 LU</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by WANG 04A</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to \omega K^{*+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>+0.29±0.35±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to \omega(K\pi)_{0}^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.10±0.09±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to \omega K_{2}^{*}(1430)^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>+0.14±0.15±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to K^{*0} \pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">-0.021±0.032 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.015±0.021±0.012</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23V</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.12±0.21<sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.14</sub></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.032±0.052<sup>+0.016</sup><sub>-0.013</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.149±0.064±0.022</td><td>GARMASH</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
-0.021±0.032 (Error scaled by 1.5)

<figure><img src="image_591.png" /></figure>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to K^{*0} \pi^{+})$

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to K^{*}(892)^{+} \pi^{0})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">-0.39±0.21 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">Error includes scale factor of 1.6.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.52±0.14<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.05</sub></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.06±0.24±0.04</td><td>LEES</td><td>11I</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.04±0.29±0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>05X</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 11I</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to K^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">0.015±0.006 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.011±0.002±0.004</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23U</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.025±0.004±0.008</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14B0</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.028±0.020±0.023</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.049±0.026±0.020</td><td>GARMASH</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.032±0.008±0.008</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AZ</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 14B0</td></tr><tr><td>-0.013±0.037±0.011</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05N</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI</td></tr><tr><td>0.01±0.07±0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03M</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 05N</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to K^{+} K^{-} K^{+} \text{ nonresonant})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.060±0.044±0.019</td><td>LEES</td><td>12O</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to f(980)^{0} K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.08±0.08±0.04</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12O</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to f_{2}(1270) K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.68<sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.17</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.85±0.22<sup>+0.26</sup><sub>-0.13</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.59±0.22±0.036</td><td>GARMASH</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to f_{0}(1500) K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.28±0.26<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.14</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B^{+} \to f'_{2}(1525)^{0} K^{+})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">-0.08<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.04</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.18±0.18±0.04</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>11I</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.106±0.050<sup>+0.036</sup><sub>-0.015</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.077±0.065<sup>+0.046</sup><sub>-0.026</sub></td><td>GARMASH</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote n="1">¹Corresponds to 90% CL interval $0.15 < A_{CP} < 0.90$</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.70 < A_{CP} < +0.38$.</footnote>

<footnote>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
0.068±0.078<sup>+0.070</sup><sub>-0.067</sub> AUBERT,B 05N BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of $B^{+} \to K_{S}^{0} \pi^{+} \pi^{0}$ decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of $B^{+} \to K_{S}^{0} \pi^{+} \pi^{0}$ decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹The second error includes both systematics and the uncertainties from CP asymmetries in restricted regions of phase space.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Measured in the $B^{+} \to K^{+} K^{-} K^{+}$ decay.</footnote>

<footnote>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</footnote>

<footnote n="0">0.14±0.10±0.04
1 LEES 12O BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)
0.31±0.25±0.08
3 AUBERT 06O BABR Repl. by LEES 12O
0.088±0.095<sup>+0.097</sup><sub>-0.056</sub>
AUBERT,B 05N BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Measured in $B^{+} \to f_{0} K^{+}$ with $f_{0} \to \pi^{0} \pi^{0}$ decay.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Measured in the $B^{+} \to K^{+} K^{-} K^{+}$ decay assuming $A_{CP}(B^{+} \to f'_{2}(1525)^{0} K^{+}) = A_{CP}(B^{+} \to f_{0}(1500)^{0} K^{+}) = A_{CP}(B^{+} \to f_{0}(1710)^{0} K^{+})$</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Measured in the $B^{+} \to K^{+} K^{-} K^{+}$ decay.</footnote>