$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_2(1270)_\perp, f_2 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{75}/\Gamma_{68} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.63±0.34<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.08</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Reported first of two solutions using the full Dalitz analysis.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_0(1370), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{76}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.34<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.14</sub> ± 0.054</td><td>1 Ll</td><td>11 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second error includes both the detector systematic and the uncertainty in the number of produced Y(5S) → $B_S^0$ $\bar{B}_S^0$ pairs.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_0(1370), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi) \quad \Gamma_{76}/\Gamma_{61} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.21<sup>+0.54</sup><sub>-3.76</sub> ± 0.04</td><td>1.2 AAIJ</td><td>12A0 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 12A0 reports (4.19 ± 0.53<sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-3.7</sub>) × 10<sup>-2</sup> from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)f_0(1370), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)]$ assuming $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (48.9 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of $B_S \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_0(1500), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{77}/\Gamma_{68} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.101±0.008<sup>+0.011</sup><sub>-0.003</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Reported first of two solutions using the full Dalitz analysis.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f'_2(1525)_0, f'_2 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{78}/\Gamma_{68} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.51±0.09<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.04</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Reported first of two solutions using the full Dalitz analysis.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f'_2(1525)_0, f'_2 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{79}/\Gamma_{68} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.06±0.13<sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.04</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Reported first of two solutions using the full Dalitz analysis.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f'_2(1525)_\perp, f'_2 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{80}/\Gamma_{68} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.26±0.18<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.04</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Reported first of two solutions using the full Dalitz analysis.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_0(1790), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{81}/\Gamma_{68} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.67<sup>+1.01</sup><sub>-0.32</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>12A0 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Reported first of two solutions using the full Dalitz analysis.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^- \text{ (nonresonant)})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi) \quad \Gamma_{82}/\Gamma_{61} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.67<sup>+1.01</sup><sub>-0.32</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>12A0 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 12A0 reports (1.66 ± 0.31<sup>+0.96</sup><sub>-0.08</sub>) × 10<sup>-2</sup> from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^- \text{ (nonresonant)})/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)]$ assuming $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (48.9 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of $B_S \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\bar{K}^0\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{83}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14L LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured with $B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-) / B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-)$ using PDG 12 values for the involved branching fractions.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{84}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

### 7.9 ±0.7 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.70 ± 0.08 ± 0.72</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13A0 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $f_s/f_d = 0.256 \pm 0.020$ and $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (10.18 \pm 0.42) \times 10^{-4}$.

² Uses $f_s = (17.2 \pm 3.0)\%$ as the fraction of $\Upsilon(5S)$ decaying to $B_S^0 \bar{B}_S^0$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^0K^-\pi^+ + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{85}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.5±1.0±0.8</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14L LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 14L reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^0K^-\pi^+ + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^0\pi^+\pi^-) = (2.12 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.18) \text{ which we multiply by our best value } B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^0\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-4}]$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. This is an observation of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^+$ with more than 10 standard deviations.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\bar{K}^0K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{86}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;12 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14L LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured with $B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0 K^+K^-)/B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-)$ using PDG 12 values for the involved branching fractions.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f'_2(1525))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{88}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.61±0.20<sup>+0.56</sup><sub>-0.50</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AN LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $f_s/f_d = 0.256 \pm 0.020$ and $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (10.18 \pm 0.42) \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f'_2(1525))/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi) \quad \Gamma_{88}/\Gamma_{61} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>21 ±4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>21.5 ± 4.9 ± 2.6</td><td>1 THORNE</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr><tr><td>21 ± 7 ± 1</td><td>2,3 ABAZOV</td><td>12AF D0</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>27 ± 4 ± 1</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>12S LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13AN</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $B(f'_2(1525) \to K^+K^-) = (44.4 \pm 1.1)\%$.

² ABAZOV 12AF reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)f'_2(1525))/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] \times B(B'_2(1525) \to K^+K^-) / B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = 0.19 \pm 0.05 \times 0.04$ which we divide and multiply by our best values $B(f'_2(1525) \to K^+K^-) = \frac{1}{2} (88.8 \pm 2.2) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

³ ABAZOV 12AF fits the invariant masses of the $K^+K^-$ pair in the range $1.35 < M(K^+K^-) < 2$ GeV.

⁴ AAIJ 12S reports $[26.4 \pm 2.7 \pm 2.4) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S) f'_2(1525))/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] \times B(f'_2(1525) \to K^+K^-) / B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)$ assuming $B(f'_2(1525) \to K^+K^-) = (44.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (48.9 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best values $B(f'_2(1525) \to K^+K^-) = \frac{1}{2} (88.8 \pm 2.2) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{89}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.58±0.19±0.39</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19U LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.8</td><td>90</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>13Z LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 19U</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured relative to $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ assuming $B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi) = (10.5 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.64) \times 10^{-4}$ and taking into account small $K^+K^-$ S-wave contribution.

² Uses $B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = (1.98 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{90}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15BB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Branching fractions of normalization modes $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\gamma X$ taken from PDG 14. Uses $f_s/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{91}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.6 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{92}/\Gamma_{68} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.371±0.015±0.022</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Excludes contributions from $\psi(2S)$ and $\chi_{c1}(3872)$ decaying to $J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-$.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_1(1285))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{93}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.2±1.3±0.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 14Y reports $(7.14 \pm 0.99^{+0.83}_{-0.91} \pm 0.41) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S) f_1(1285))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(f_1(1285) \to 2\pi^+2\pi^-)]$ assuming $B(f_1(1285) \to 2\pi^+2\pi^-) = 0.11^{+0.007}_{-0.006}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(f_1(1285) \to 2\pi^+2\pi^-) = (10.9 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.
$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\eta)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta) \qquad \Gamma_{94}/\Gamma_{64} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.83±0.14±0.12</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AA LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assuming lepton universality for dimuon decay modes of $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ mesons, the ratio $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-)/B(\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = B(J/\psi \to e^+e^-)/B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = 7.69 \pm 0.19$ was used.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\eta')/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta') \qquad \Gamma_{95}/\Gamma_{67} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>38.7±9.0±1.6</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-, \eta' \to \rho^0\gamma$, and $\eta' \to \eta\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{96}/\Gamma_{68} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.34±0.04±0.03</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AA LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assuming lepton universality for dimuon decay modes of $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ mesons, the ratio $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-)/B(\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = B(J/\psi \to e^+e^-)/B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = 7.69 \pm 0.19$ was used.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{97}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

seen 1 BUSKULIC 93G ALEP $e^+e^- \to Z$

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\phi)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi) \qquad \Gamma_{97}/\Gamma_{61} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.503±0.035</td><td>1.2 AAIJ</td><td>12l LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.53 ±0.10 ±0.09</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>09Y D0</td><td>p&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.52 ±0.13 ±0.07</td><td>ABULENCIA</td><td>06N CDF</td><td>p&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 12l reports $0.489 \pm 0.026 \pm 0.021$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)] / [B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)]$ assuming $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.94 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = (7.72 \pm 0.17) \times 10^{-3}$, which we rescale to our best values $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.971 \pm 0.032) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (7.94 \pm 0.22) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

²Assumes $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-) / B(\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = B(J/\psi \to e^+e^-) / B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = 7.69 \pm 0.19$.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\kappa^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{98}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

¹9.1±0.5±0.2 1 TUMASYAN 22AI CMS pp at 13 TeV

¹TUMASYAN 22AI reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \psi(2S)\kappa^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to \psi(2S)\kappa^0)] = (3.33 \pm 0.69 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.34) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to \psi(2S)\kappa^0) = (5.8 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\kappa^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{99}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

³3.12±0.30±0.21 1 AAIJ 15u LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹AAIJ 15u reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \psi(2S)\kappa^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to \psi(2S)\kappa^-\pi^+)] = (5.38 \pm 0.36 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.31) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to \psi(2S)\kappa^-\pi^+) = (5.8 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\bar{K}^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{100}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

³3.3±0.5±0.2 1 AAIJ 15u LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹AAIJ 15u reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \psi(2S)\bar{K}^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to \psi(2S)\kappa^*(892)^0)] = (5.58 \pm 0.57 \pm 0.40 \pm 0.32) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to \psi(2S)\kappa^*(892)^0) = (5.9 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}\phi)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi) \qquad \Gamma_{101}/\Gamma_{61} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

¹8.9±1.8±1.5 1 AAIJ 13AC LHCB pp at 7 TeV

¹Uses $B(\chi_{c1} \to J/\psi\gamma) = (34.4 \pm 1.5)\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}K^+K^-)/\Gamma(\chi_{c1}K^+K^-) \qquad \Gamma_{103}/\Gamma_{102} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

¹7.1±3.1±1.0 1 AAIJ 18AC LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹Measures the ratio for ±15 MeV window around $\phi$ mass.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)\phi)/\Gamma(\psi(2S)\phi) \qquad \Gamma_{104}/\Gamma_{97} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

²0.23±0.06 OUR AVERAGE 1 AAIJ 21C LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

²0.22±0.03±0.06 2 SIRUNYAN 20BB CMS pp at 13 TeV

¹AAIJ 21C reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)\phi)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi)] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi(1S))] / [B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-)] = (2.42 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.07) \times 10^{-2}$

which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi(1S)) = (3.5 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = (34.69 \pm 0.34) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

²SIRUNYAN 20BB reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)\phi)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi)] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi(1S))] / [B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-)] = (2.21 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.17) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi(1S)) = (3.5 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = (34.69 \pm 0.34) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(\psi(2S)\pi^+\pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{106}/\Gamma_{96} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.67±0.11±0.18</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AP LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 23AP reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \psi(2S)\pi^+\pi^-)] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi(1S))] / [B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-)] = (6.8 \pm 1.1 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-2}$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \to \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi(1S)) = (3.5 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = (34.69 \pm 0.34) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi K^*(892)^0\bar{K}^*(892)^0)/\Gamma(\psi(2S)\phi) \qquad \Gamma_{87}/\Gamma_{97} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.209±0.006±0.003</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21C LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 21C reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^*(892)^0\bar{K}^*(892)^0)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi) B^2(K^0 \to K^+\pi^-) / [B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-)/B(\phi \to K^+K^-)] = (1.22 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.04)$ which we adjust with PDG 20 values of $B(K^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (99.902 \pm 0.009) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\psi(2S) \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-) = (34.68 \pm 0.30) \times 10^{-2}$, and $B(\phi \to K^+K^-) = (49.2 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. The first uncertainty is the total experiment's one and the second is due to the adjustment branching fractions.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)(K^+K^-)\text{non-}\phi)/\Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872)\phi) \qquad \Gamma_{105}/\Gamma_{104} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.77±0.17±0.01</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21C LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 21C reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)(K^+K^-)\text{non-}\phi)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \chi_{c1}(3872)\phi)] / [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 1.57 \pm 0.32 \pm 0.12$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{107}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

²7.2±1.0 OUR AVERAGE

7.5±0.9±0.7 1 AAIJ 17G LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV

6.5±1.8±0.6 2 AALTONEN 12l CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

10.9±2.6±1.1 3 AAIJ 12AR LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 17G

<120 90 4 PENG 10 BELL $e^+e^- \to \tau(5S)$

<120 90 5 AALTONEN 09c CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12L

<17 90 6 ABULENCIA,A 06d CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 09C

<2320 90 7 ABE 00c SLD $e^+e^- \to Z$

<1700 90 8 BUSKULIC 96v ALEP $e^+e^- \to Z$

¹AAIJ 17G reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-)] \times [\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)] = (9.15 \pm 0.71 \pm 0.83) \times 10^{-3}$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (2.00 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-5}$, $\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) = 0.246 \pm 0.023$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

²AALTONEN 12L reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-)] \times [\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)] = 0.008 \pm 0.002 \pm 0.001$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (2.00 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-5}$, $\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) = 0.246 \pm 0.023$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

³AAIJ 12AR reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)] \times [\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)] = (0.050 \pm 0.011 \pm 0.004)$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-) = (5.37 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-6}$, $\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) = 0.246 \pm 0.023$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

⁴Uses $\Gamma(10860) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^*$ and assumes $B(\tau(10860) \to B_S^*(\bar{B}_S^*)) = (19.3 \pm 2.9)\%$ and $\Gamma(\tau(10860) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^*) / \Gamma(\tau(10860) \to B_S^*(\bar{B}_S^*)) = (90.1 \pm 3.4)\%$.

⁵Obtains this result from $(f_S/f_d) \cdot B(B_S \to \pi^+\pi^-)/B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = 0.007 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.005$, assuming $f_S/f_d = 0.276 \pm 0.034$ and $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (19.4 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-6}$.

⁶ABULENCIA,A 06d obtains this from $B(B_S \to \pi^+\pi^-) / B(B_S \to K^+K^-) < 0.05$ at 90% CL, assuming $B(B_S \to K^+K^-) = (33 \pm 6 \pm 7) \times 10^{-6}$.

⁷ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = (21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the B fractions $f_{B^0} = f_{B^+} = (39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_S} = (10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

⁸BUSKULIC 96v assumes PDG 96 production fractions for $B^0, B^+, B_S, b$ baryons.
# Meson Particle Listings

## $B_S^0$

### $\Gamma(\pi^0\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BORAH</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.1 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 ACCIARRI</td><td>95H</td><td>L3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ BORAH 23 assumes $f_{B_S} = 20.1 \pm 3.1\%$.

² ACCIARRI 95H assumes $f_{B^0} = 39.5 \pm 4.0$ and $f_{B_S} = 12.0 \pm 3.0\%$.

### $\Gamma(\eta\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ACCIARRI</td><td>95H</td><td>L3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ ACCIARRI 95H assumes $f_{B^0} = 39.5 \pm 4.0$ and $f_{B_S} = 12.0 \pm 3.0\%$.

### $\Gamma(\eta\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.43 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>BHUYAN</td><td>22</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.5 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ACCIARRI</td><td>95H</td><td>L3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ ACCIARRI 95H assumes $f_{B^0} = 39.5 \pm 4.0$ and $f_{B_S} = 12.0 \pm 3.0\%$.

### $\Gamma(\rho^0\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.20 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>00c</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = (21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the B fractions $f_{B^0} = f_{B^+} = (39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_S} = (10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

### $\Gamma(\eta'K_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8.16 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 PANG</td><td>22</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $\Gamma(10860) \to B_S^*(\bar{B}_S^*)$ decays and assumes $B(\Gamma(10860) \to B_S^*(\bar{B}_S^*)) = (20.1 \pm 3.1)\%$.

### $\Gamma(\eta'\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 NISAR</td><td>21</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $\Gamma(10860) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^*$ decays and assumes $B(\Gamma(10860) \to B_S^*(\bar{B}_S^*)) = (20.1 \pm 3.1)\%$.

### $\Gamma(\eta'\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.3±0.7±0.1</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>150</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 150 reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \eta'\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^+ \to \eta'K^+)] = 0.47 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.04$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^+ \to \eta'K^+) = (7.04 \pm 0.25) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

### $\Gamma(\eta'\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.82 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17BA</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Corresponds to the 95% CL upper limit $1.01 \times 10^{-6}$. Uses the normalization mode $B^+ \to \eta'K^+$ with branching fraction $(70.6 \pm 2.5) \times 10^{-6}$ and the ratio of hadronisation fractions $f_S/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$, which is assumed equal to $f_S/f_u$.

### $\Gamma(\eta'X_{5S})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 DUBEY</td><td>21</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ DUBEY 21 result is for $m(X_{5S}) < 2.85 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.

### $\Gamma(\phi f_0(980), f_0(980) \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.12±0.16±0.14</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Signal is observed with 8 standard deviations significance.

### $\Gamma(\phi f_2(1270), f_2(1270) \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.61±0.13<sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.08</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Signal is observed with 5 standard deviations significance.

### $\Gamma(\phi\rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.7±0.7±0.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6170</td><td>90</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>00c</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Signal evidence is 4 standard deviations.

² ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = (21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the B fractions $f_{B^0} = f_{B^+} = (39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_S} = (10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

### $\Gamma(\phi\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.48±0.23±0.39</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Inclusive decays in mass range $400 < m(\pi^+\pi^-) < 1600 \text{ MeV/c}^2$.

### $\Gamma(\phi\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>18.5±1.4 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>18.5±1.4±1.0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 15AS LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>14<sup>+6</sup><sub>-5</sub> ±6</td><td>2 AOSTA</td><td>05J</td><td>CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 11AN</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1183</td><td>90</td><td>3 ABE</td><td>00c</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 15AS reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \phi\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^0\phi)] = 1.84 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.13$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^0\phi) = (1.00 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Uses $B(B^0 \to J/\psi\phi) = (1.38 \pm 0.49) \times 10^{-3}$ and production cross-section ratio of $\sigma(B_S)/\sigma(B^0) = 0.26 \pm 0.04$.

³ ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = (21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the B fractions $f_{B^0} = f_{B^+} = (39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_S} = (10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

### $\Gamma(\phi\phi)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.77±0.14 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.78±0.14±0.20</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AALTONEN 11AN CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

### $\Gamma(\phi\phi\phi)/\Gamma(\phi\phi)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.117±0.030±0.015</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BB</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Gamma(\pi^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.9±0.7 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

6.0±0.7±0.6

5.8±1.0±0.5

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;26</td><td>90</td><td>3 PENG</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5.6</td><td>90</td><td>4 ABULENCIA,A</td><td>06C</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 09C</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;261</td><td>90</td><td>5 ABE</td><td>00c</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;210</td><td>90</td><td>6 BUSKULIC</td><td>96V</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;260</td><td>90</td><td>7 AKERS</td><td>94L</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 12AR reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \pi^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-)] \times [\Gamma(b \to B_S^0)] = 0.074 \pm 0.006 \pm 0.006$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (2.00 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-5}$, $\Gamma(b \to B_S^0)/\Gamma(b \to B^0) = 0.246 \pm 0.023$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

² AALTONEN 09C reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \pi^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-)] \times [\Gamma(b \to B_S^0)] / [B(b \to B^0)] = 0.071 \pm 0.010 \pm 0.007$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (2.00 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-5}$, $B(b \to B_S^0) = (10.0 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(b \to B^0) = (40.8 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

³ Uses $\Gamma(10860) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^*$ and assumes $B(\Gamma(10860) \to B_S^*(\bar{B}_S^*)) = (19.3 \pm 2.9)\%$ and $\Gamma(\Gamma(10860) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^*) / \Gamma(\Gamma(10860) \to B_S^*(\bar{B}_S^*)) = (90.1 \pm 3.8)\%$.

⁴ ABULENCIA,A 06D obtains this from $(f_S/f_d) = (B(B_S^0 \to \pi^+K^-) / B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-)) < 0.08$ at 90% CL, assuming $f_S/f_d = 0.260 \pm 0.039$ and $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (18.9 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-6}$.

⁵ ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = (21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the B fractions $f_{B^0} = f_{B^+} = (39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_S} = (10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

⁶ BUSKULIC 96v assumes PDG 96 production fractions for $B^0$, $B^+$, $B_S$, baryons.

⁷ Assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = 0.217$ and $B_S^0(B_S^0)$ fraction 39.5% (12%).

### $\Gamma(K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>27.2±2.3 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

25.7±1.7±2.5

28.3±2.4±2.7

38<sup>+10</sup><sub>-9</sub> ±7

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;310</td><td>90</td><td>DRUTSKOY</td><td>07A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr><tr><td>33 ± 6 ± 7</td><td>90</td><td>4 ABULENCIA,A</td><td>06C</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11N</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;283</td><td>90</td><td>5 ABE</td><td>00c</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;59</td><td>90</td><td>6 BUSKULIC</td><td>96V</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;140</td><td>90</td><td>7 AKERS</td><td>94L</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 12AR reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-)] \times [\Gamma(b \to B_S^0)] = 0.316 \pm 0.009 \pm 0.019$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (2.00 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-5}$, $\Gamma(b \to B_S^0)/\Gamma(b \to B^0) = 0.246 \pm 0.023$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.
² AALTONEN 11N reports ($f_s/f_d$) ($B(B_5^0 \to K^+K^-) / B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = 0.347 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.011$). We multiply this result by our best value of $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (2.00 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-5}$ and divide by our best value of $f_s/f_d$, where $1/2 f_s/f_d = 0.1230 \pm 0.0115$. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.

³ Uses $\Gamma(10860) \to B_s^+B_s^-$ and assumes $\Gamma(B(10860) \to B_s^+(\bar{B}_s^+)) = (19.3 \pm 2.9)\%$ and $\Gamma(\Gamma(10860) \to B_s^+\bar{B}_s^+) / \Gamma(\Gamma(10860) \to B_s^+(\bar{B}_s^+)) = (90.1 \pm 3.8)\%$.

⁴ ABULENCIA, A 06d obtains this from ($f_s/f_d$) ($B(B_5 \to K^+K^-) / B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = 0.46 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.07$, assuming $f_s/f_d = 0.260 \pm 0.039$ and $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (18.9 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-6}$.

⁵ ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = (21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the B fractions $f_{B^0} = f_{B^+} = (39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_5} = (10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

⁶ BUSKULIC 96v assumes PDG 96 production fractions of $B^0, B^+, B_5, b$ baryons.

⁷ Assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = 0.217$ and $B_d^0(B_5^0) = 39.5\% (12\%)$.

$$ \Gamma(K^0\bar{K}^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{124}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

1.76$\pm$0.31 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>1.68$\pm$0.34</td><td>+0.16</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20F</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.15</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.96$\pm$0.58</td><td>+0.10</td><td>2 PAL</td><td>16</td><td>BELL</td><td>e$^+$e$^-$ &rarr; $\Upsilon(55)$</td></tr><tr><td>-0.51</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;6.6</td><td>90</td><td>3 PENG</td><td>10</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by PAL 16</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 20f reports $[\Gamma(B_5^0 \to K^0\bar{K}^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^0\phi)] = 2.3 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.2 \pm 0.1$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^0\phi) = (7.3 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-6}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Observed in $B_5^0 \to K_S^0 K_S^0$ with significance of 5.1 $\sigma$. The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty of the total number of $B_5^0\bar{B}_5^0$ pairs.

³ Uses $\Gamma(10860) \to B_s^+\bar{B}_s^-$ and assumes $\Gamma(B(10860) \to B_s^+(\bar{B}_s^+)) = (19.3 \pm 2.9)\%$ and $\Gamma(\Gamma(10860) \to B_s^+\bar{B}_s^+) / \Gamma(\Gamma(10860) \to B_s^+(\bar{B}_s^+)) = (90.1 \pm 3.8)\%$.

$$ \Gamma(K^0\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{125}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>9.5$\pm$2.1</td><td>±0.3</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BP LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>14</td><td>±4</td><td>1</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>13BP LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 17BP</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 17BP reports $[\Gamma(B_5^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-)] = 0.191 \pm 0.027 \pm 0.033$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.97 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Used $f_s/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

³ AAIJ 13BP reports $[\Gamma(B_5^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-)] = 0.29 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.04$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.97 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(K^0K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{126}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>8.4$\pm$0.8</td><td>±0.3</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BP LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>7.4$\pm$0.9</td><td>±0.3</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>13BP LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 17BP</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 17BP reports $[\Gamma(B_5^0 \to K^0K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-)] = 1.70 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.15$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.97 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Used $f_s/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

³ AAIJ 13BP reports $[\Gamma(B_5^0 \to K^0K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-)] = 1.48 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.14$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.97 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{127}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>2.9$\pm$1.0</td><td>±0.2</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>14BM LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 14BP reports $[\Gamma(B_5^0 \to K^*(892)^-\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^+\pi^-)] = 0.39 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.05$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^+\pi^-) = (7.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-6}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Uses $f_s/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^\pm K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{128}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>1.86$\pm$0.12</td><td>±0.45</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>19K LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.12$\pm$0.21</td><td>+0.07</td><td>3,4 AAIJ</td><td>14BM LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 19K</td></tr><tr><td>-0.06</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 19K reports $(18.6 \pm 1.2 \pm 0.8 \pm 4.0 \pm 2.0) \times 10^{-6}$ as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.

² Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of $B_5^0 \to K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^+$ decays.

³ AAIJ 14BP reports $[\Gamma(B_5^0 \to K^*(892)^\pm K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^+\pi^-)] = 1.49 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.18$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^+\pi^-) = (7.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-6}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴ Uses $f_s/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

$$ \Gamma(K_0^0(1430)^\pm K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{129}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>3.13$\pm$0.23</td><td>±2.53</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>19K LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 19K reports $(31.3 \pm 2.3 \pm 0.7 \pm 25.1 \pm 3.3) \times 10^{-6}$ as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.

² Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of $B_5^0 \to K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^+$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(K_2^0(1430)^\pm K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{130}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>1.03$\pm$0.25</td><td>±1.64</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>19K LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 19K reports $(10.3 \pm 2.5 \pm 1.1 \pm 16.3 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-6}$ as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.

² Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of $B_5^0 \to K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^+$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K^0 + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{131}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>1.96$\pm$0.28</td><td>±0.50</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>19K LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 19K reports $(19.8 \pm 2.8 \pm 1.2 \pm 4.4 \pm 2.1) \times 10^{-6}$ as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.

² Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of $B_5^0 \to K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^+$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(K_0^0(1430)^0 K^0 + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{132}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>3.30$\pm$0.25</td><td>±0.98</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>19K LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 19K reports $(33.0 \pm 2.5 \pm 0.9 \pm 9.1 \pm 3.5) \times 10^{-6}$ as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.

² Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of $B_5^0 \to K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^+$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(K_2^0(1430)^0 K^0 + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{133}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>1.68$\pm$0.45</td><td>±2.13</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>19K LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 19K reports $(16.8 \pm 4.5 \pm 1.7 \pm 21.2 \pm 1.8) \times 10^{-6}$ as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.

² Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of $B_5^0 \to K_S^0 K^\pm\pi^+$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K^+ K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{134}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>16.4$\pm$3.4</td><td>±2.3</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ Measured relative to $B^0 \to K_S^0\pi^+\pi^-$ using the value of $B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.96 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-5}$.

$$ \Gamma(K^0K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{135}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-7}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>12.9$\pm$6.5</td><td>±0.5</td><td>1,2,3 AAIJ</td><td>17BP LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;34</td><td>90</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>13BP LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 17BP</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 17BP reports $[\Gamma(B_5^0 \to K^0K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-)] = 0.026 \pm 0.011 \pm 0.007$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.97 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² AAIJ 17BP also set the limit range $4-25 \times 10^{-7}$ at 90% CL using the world average value $B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-) = (4.96 \pm 0.20) \times 10^{-5}$.

³ Used $f_s/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

⁴ AAIJ 13BP reports $[\Gamma(B_5^0 \to K^0K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-)] < 0.068$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^0\pi^+\pi^-) = 4.97 \times 10^{-5}$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{K}^*(892)^0 \rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{136}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-4}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>&lt;7.67 \times 10^{-4}</td><td>90</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD</td><td>e$^+$e$^-$ &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = (21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the $B$ fractions $f_{B^0} = f_{B^+} = (39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_5} = (10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{K}^*(892)^0 K^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{137}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>1.11$\pm$0.26</td><td>±0.06</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AF LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.81$\pm$0.46</td><td>±0.56</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>12F LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 15AF</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;168.1</td><td>90</td><td>3 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD</td><td>e$^+$e$^-$ &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 15AF reports $[\Gamma(B_5^0 \to K^*(892)^0 K^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \phi)] = 1.11 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.06$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \phi) = (1.00 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.
# Meson Particle Listings

## $B_S^0$

² Uses $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*0$ for normalization and assumes $B(B^0 \to J/\psi K^*0) B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-) B(K^*0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (1.33 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-3}$ and $f_S/f_d = 0.253 \pm 0.031$. The second quoted error is total uncertainty including the error of 0.34 on $f_S/f_d$.

³ ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b})=(21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the B fractions $f_{B^0}=f_{B^+}=(39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_S}=(10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

## $\Gamma(\phi K^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ141/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.14&plusmn;0.29&plusmn;0.06</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13BW LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;1013</th><th>90</th><th>2 ABE</th><th>00c</th><th>SLD</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</th></tr></thead></table>

¹ AAIJ 13BW reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \phi K^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \phi)] = 0.113 \pm 0.024 \pm 0.016$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \phi) = (1.00 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b})=(21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the B fractions $f_{B^0}=f_{B^+}=(39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_S}=(10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

## $\Gamma(\bar{p}\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ142/Γ

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 0.44</td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23T LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt; 1.5</th><th>90</th><th>2 AAIJ</th><th>17BJ LHCB</th><th>Repl. by AAIJ 23T</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.84&plusmn;2.03&plusmn;0.85</td><td>-1.68&minus;0.18</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>13BQ LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 17BJ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;5900</th><th>90</th><th>4 BUSKULIC</th><th>96V ALEP</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</th></tr></thead></table>

¹ Uses normalization mode $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (19.6 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-6}$ and $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)/f(\bar{b} \to B_d^0) = 0.2539 \pm 0.0079$.

² Uses normalization mode $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (19.6 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-6}$ and $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)/f(\bar{b} \to B_d^0) = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

³ Uses normalization mode $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (19.55 \pm 0.54) \times 10^{-6}$ and $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)/f(\bar{b} \to B_d^0) = 0.256 \pm 0.020$.

⁴ BUSKULIC 96V assumes PDG 96 production fractions for $B^0$, $B^+$, $B_S$, b baryons.

## $\Gamma(\bar{p}\bar{p}K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ143/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.5&plusmn;0.4&plusmn;0.2</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 17BD reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to p\bar{p}K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0)] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] / [B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi^\pm)] = 1.67 \pm 0.12 \times 0.11$ which we multiply by our best values $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0) = (1.27 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi^\pm) = (99.902 \pm 0.009) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values. Reported value assumes $f_S/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

² The branching ratio is given for $m_{p\bar{p}}<2.85$ GeV.

## $\Gamma(\bar{p}\bar{p}K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ144/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>13.9&plusmn;2.5&plusmn;0.5</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 17BD reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to p\bar{p}K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0)] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] / [B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi^\pm)] = 0.52 \pm 0.08 \times 0.05$ which we multiply by our best values $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0) = (1.27 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi^\pm) = (99.902 \pm 0.009) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values. Reported value assumes $f_S/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

² The branching ratio is given for $m_{p\bar{p}}<2.85$ GeV.

## $\Gamma(\bar{p}\bar{p}K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(\bar{p}\bar{p}K^+K^-)$

Γ144/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.31&plusmn;0.05&plusmn;0.02</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Reports $B(B_S^0 \to p\bar{p}K^+\pi^-) / B(B^0 \to p\bar{p}K^+\pi^-) = 0.22 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.01$, where the third error is due to $f_S/f_d$.

² The ratio is given for $m_{p\bar{p}}<2.85$ GeV and assuming $f_S/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

## $\Gamma(\bar{p}\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ145/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.3&plusmn;2.0&plusmn;0.2</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 17BD reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0)] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] / [B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi^\pm)] = 0.16 \pm 0.07 \times 0.02$ which we multiply by our best values $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0) = (1.27 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi^\pm) = (99.902 \pm 0.009) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values. Reported value assumes $f_S/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

² The branching ratio is given for $m_{p\bar{p}}<2.85$ GeV.

## $\Gamma(\bar{p}\bar{p}p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ146/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.3&plusmn;1.0&plusmn;0.2</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AD LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 23AD reports $(2.3 \pm 1.0 \pm 0.2 \pm 0.1) \times 10^{-8}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to p\bar{p}p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})]$ assuming $B(B_S^0 \to K^+K^-) = (1.04 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(B(1020) \to K^+K^-) = 0.491 \pm 0.005$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$.

## $\Gamma(\bar{p}\bar{p}K^- + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ147/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.5&plusmn;0.9&plusmn;0.4</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17AL LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17AL LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 17AL reports $(5.46 \pm 0.61 \pm 0.82) \times 10^{-6}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to p\bar{p}K^- + \text{c.c.})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to p\bar{p}\pi^-)]$ assuming $B(B^0 \to p\bar{p}\pi^-) = (3.14 \pm 0.29) \times 10^{-6}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(B^0 \to p\bar{p}\pi^-) = (3.16 \pm 0.24) \times 10^{-6}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² AAIJ 17AL value represents the sum of $B_S^0 \to p\bar{p}K^-$ and $B_S^0 \to p\bar{p}\Lambda K^+$ and assumes the fraction $f_S/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

## $\Gamma(\Lambda_c \Lambda\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ148/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.6&plusmn;1.1&plusmn;1.2</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 SOLOVIEVA</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second error is the total systematic uncertainty including the $\Lambda_c$ absolute branching fractions and the normalization number of $B_S$ events.

## $\Gamma(\Lambda_c\Lambda^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ149/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8.0 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>95</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AA LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $B(B^0 \to D^+D^-) = (7.2 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-3}$.

## $\Gamma(\gamma\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ150/Γ

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 3.1</td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 DUTTA</td><td>15 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(55)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt; 8.7</th><th>90</th><th>2 WICHT</th><th>08A BELL</th><th>Repl. by DUTTA 15</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>&lt; 53</th><th>90</th><th>DRUTSKOY</th><th>07A BELL</th><th>Repl. by WICHT 08A</th></tr><tr><th>&lt;148</th><th>90</th><th>3 ACCIARRI</th><th>95I L3</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</th></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes the fraction of $B_S^*(\bar{B}^*)$ in $b\bar{b}$ events is $f_S = (17.2 \pm 3.0)\%$.

² Assumes $\Gamma(5S) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^* = (19.5 \pm 3.0)\%$.

³ ACCIARRI 95I assumes $f_{B^0} = 39.5 \pm 4.0$ and $f_{B_S} = (12.0 \pm 3.0)\%$.

## $\Gamma(\phi\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ151/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>34 &plusmn; 4</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 DUTTA</td><td>15 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(55)</td></tr></tbody></table>

36 &plusmn; 5 &plusmn; 7
33.8 &plusmn; 3.4 &plusmn; 2.0

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt; 390</th><th>90</th><th>DRUTSKOY</th><th>07A BELL</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(55)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>&lt;120</th><th>90</th><th>ACOSTA</th><th>02G CDF</th><th>p\bar{p} at 1.8 TeV</th></tr><tr><th>&lt;700</th><th>90</th><th>5 ADAM</th><th>96D DLPH</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</th></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes the fraction of $B_S^*(\bar{B}^*)$ in $b\bar{b}$ events is $f_S = (17.2 \pm 3.0)\%$. The systematic uncertainty from $f_S$ is $0.6 \times 10^{-5}$.

² AAIJ 13 reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \phi\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^0\gamma)] = 0.81 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.07$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to K^*(892)^0\gamma) = (4.18 \pm 0.25) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ Measures $B(B^0 \to K^*0\gamma)/B(B_S \to \phi\gamma) = 1.12 \pm 0.08(\text{stat}) \pm 0.06(\text{sys}) \pm 0.08(f_S/f_d)$ and uses current world-average value of $B(B^0 \to K^*0\gamma) = (4.33 \pm 0.15) \times 10^{-5}$.

⁴ Assumes $\Gamma(5S) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^* = (19.5 \pm 3.0)\%$.

⁵ ADAM 96D assumes $f_{B^0} = f_{B^-} = 0.39$ and $f_{B_S} = 0.12$.

## $\Gamma(\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

Γ152/Γ

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.34&plusmn;0.27</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 TUMASYAN</td><td>23A CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

3.83&plusmn;0.38 &plusmn; 0.24
-0.36 &minus; 0.21

3.09&plusmn;0.46 &plusmn; 0.15
-0.43 &minus; 0.11

2.9 &plusmn; 0.6 &plusmn; 0.4

2.8 &plusmn; 0.8
-0.7

AAIJ 22 LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

20AG CMS pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

3 AABOUD 19L ATLS pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.0</td><td>+0.6</td><td>+0.3</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17AI</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 22</td></tr><tr><td>0.9</td><td>+1.1</td><td>-0.8</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.8</td><td>+0.7</td><td>-0.6</td><td>4 AABOUD</td><td>16L</td><td>ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AABOUD 19L</td></tr><tr><td>3.2</td><td>+1.4</td><td>+0.5</td><td>5 KHACHATRY...15BE LHC</td><td></td><td></td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.9</td><td>+1.1</td><td>+0.3</td><td>6 AAIJ</td><td>13B</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13BA</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>+9</td><td>-7</td><td>7 AAIJ</td><td>13BA</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by KHACHATRYAN 15BE</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;12</td><td></td><td></td><td>8 AALTONEN</td><td>13F</td><td>CDF</td><td>p&#773;p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.0</td><td>+1.0</td><td>-0.9</td><td>9 ABAZOV</td><td>13C</td><td>D0</td><td>p&#773;p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;19</td><td></td><td></td><td>10 CHATRCHYAN 13AW CMS</td><td></td><td></td><td>Repl. by SIRUNYAN 20AG</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;12</td><td></td><td></td><td>11 AAD</td><td>12AE</td><td>ATLS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.8</td><td></td><td></td><td>12 AAIJ</td><td>12A</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 12W</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.4</td><td></td><td></td><td>13 AAIJ</td><td>12W</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13B</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;43</td><td></td><td></td><td>14 CHATRCHYAN 12A CMS</td><td></td><td></td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;35</td><td></td><td></td><td>15 AAIJ</td><td>11B</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 12A</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;16</td><td></td><td></td><td>16 AALTONEN</td><td>11AG</td><td>CDF</td><td>p&#773;p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;42</td><td></td><td></td><td>17 CHATRCHYAN 11T CMS</td><td></td><td></td><td>Repl. by CHATRCHYAN 12A</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>18 ABAZOV</td><td>10S</td><td>D0</td><td>p&#773;p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses normalization mode $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.020 \pm 0.019) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (5.961 \pm 0.033) \times 10^{-2}$ and $B$ production ratio $f(b \to B^0_S)/f(b \to B^+) = 0.231 \pm 0.008$.

2 Uses normalization mode $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.01 \pm 0.03) \times 10^{-3}$ and $B$ production ratio $f(b \to B^0_S)/f(b \to B^+) = 0.252 \pm 0.012 \pm 0.015$.

3 Uses normalization mode $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.010 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$ and $B$ production ratio $f(b \to B^0_S)/f(b \to B^0) = 0.256 \pm 0.013$.

4 This value corresponds to an upper limit of $< 3.0 \times 10^{-9}$ at 95% C.L. It uses $f_s/f_d = 0.24 \pm 0.02$.

5 Determined from the joint fit to CMS and LHCb data. Uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic component.

6 Uses $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_d) = 0.256 \pm 0.020$ and two normalization modes: $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) \to \mu^+\mu^- K^+) = (6.01 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-5}$ and $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (1.94 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-5}$.

7 Uses $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_d) = 0.259 \pm 0.015$ and normalization modes $B^+ \to J/\psi K^+ \to \mu^+\mu^- K^+$ and $B^0 \to K^+\pi^-\pi^-$.

8 Uses normalization mode $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (10.22 \pm 0.35) \times 10^{-4}$ and $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_d) = 0.28 \pm 0.04$.

9 Uses normalization mode $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) \to \mu^+\mu^- K^+) = (6.01 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-5}$ and $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_d) = 0.263 \pm 0.017$.

10 Uses $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_d) = 0.256 \pm 0.020$ and $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) \to \mu^+\mu^- K^+) = (6.0 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-5}$ for normalization.

11 Uses $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^+)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S) = 3.75 \pm 0.29$ and $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) \to \mu^+\mu^- K^+) = (6.0 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-5}$.

12 Uses $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_d) = 0.267^{+0.021}_{-0.020}$ and three normalization modes $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) \to \mu^+\mu^- K^+) = (6.01 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-5}$, $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (1.94 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-5}$, and $B(B^0 \to J/\psi\phi \to \mu^+\mu^- K^+ K^-) = (3.4 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-5}$.

13 Uses $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_d) = 0.267^{+0.021}_{-0.020}$ and three normalization modes of $B^+ \to J/\psi K^+, B^0 \to K^+\pi^-$, and $B^0 \to J/\psi\phi$.

14 Uses $f_s/f_u = 0.267 \pm 0.021$ and $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) \to \mu^+\mu^- K^+) = (6.0 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-5}$.

15 Uses $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^+)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S) = 3.71 \pm 0.47$ and three normalization modes.

16 Uses $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^+)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S) = 3.55 \pm 0.47$ and $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) \to \mu^+\mu^- K^+) = (6.01 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-5}$.

17 Uses $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^+)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S) = 3.55 \pm 0.42$ and $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) \to \mu^+\mu^- K^+) = (6.0 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-5}$.

18 Uses $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^+)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S) = 3.86 \pm 0.59$, and the number of $B^+ \to J/\psi K^+$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(e^+e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{153/\Gamma} $$

Test for $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;9.4 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20W</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.8 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>09P</td><td>CDF</td><td>p&#773;p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 ACCIARRI</td><td>97B</td><td>L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes no contribution from $B^0 \to e^+e^-$ decays.

2 ACCIARRI 97B assume PDG 96 production fractions for $B^+, B^0, B_S$, and $\Lambda_b$.

$$ \Gamma(\tau^+\tau^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{154/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.8 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17AI</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assuming no contribution from $B^0 \to \tau^+\tau^-$.

$$ \Gamma(\mu^+\mu^-\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{155/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.0 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>22</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The exclusion is limited to the range $m_{\mu\mu} > 4.9$ GeV/c$^2$.

$$ \Gamma(\mu^+\mu^-\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{156/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8.6 × 10<sup>-10</sup></td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.5 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.6 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AW</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 17N</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Also reports a limit of $< 1.2 \times 10^{-8}$ at 90% CL.

$$ \Gamma(SP, S \to \mu^+\mu^-, P \to \mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{157/\Gamma} $$

Here $S$ and $P$ are the hypothetical scalar and pseudoscalar particles with masses of 2.5 GeV/c$^2$ and 214.3 MeV/c$^2$, respectively.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.2 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AW</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 17N</td></tr><tr><td>1 Also reports a limit of $< 1.6 \times 10^{-8}$ at 95% CL.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(a\bar{a}, a \to \mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{158/\Gamma} $$

Here particle $a$ is a scalar with a mass of 1 GeV/c$^2$.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.8 × 10<sup>-10</sup></td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22Q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi(1020)\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{159/\Gamma} $$

Test for $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;32</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.7 × 10<sup>2</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ABAZOV</td><td>06G</td><td>D0 p&#773;p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>02D</td><td>CDF p&#773;p at 1.8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses $B(B^0_S \to J/\psi\phi) = 9.3 \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(\phi(1020)\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi) \qquad \Gamma_{159/\Gamma_{61}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.806 ± 0.026</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.800 ± 0.021 ± 0.016</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21AG</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.13 ± 0.19 ± 0.07</td><td></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AG</td><td>CDF p&#773;p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>















1 Normalizes to $B(B^0 \to J/\psi K^*) = 1.19 \pm 0.01 \pm 0.08\%$ and $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-) = 5.96 \pm 0.03\%$, and uses $f_s/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

$$ \Gamma(f_2^{(1525)}\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\phi) \qquad \Gamma_{160/\Gamma_{61}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.55 ± 0.19 ± 0.08</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>11S</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured by combining the $q^2$ regions [0.1, 0.98], [1.1, 8.0], and [11.0, 12.5] GeV$^2$/c$^4$.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{162/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.4 ± 1.6 ± 0.3</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15S</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 15S reports $(8.6 \pm 1.5 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-8}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0_S \to \pi^+\pi^-\mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^*(892)^0)]$ assuming $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^*(892)^0) = (1.3 \pm 0.1) \times 10^{-3}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^*(892)^0) = (1.27 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\phi\nu\bar{\nu})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{163/\Gamma} $$

Test for $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.4 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ADAM</td><td>96D</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 ADAM 96D assumes $f_B^0 = f_{B^-} = 0.39$ and $f_{B_S} = 0.12$.

$$ \Gamma(e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{164/\Gamma} $$

Test of lepton family number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.4 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>13BM LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 18T</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.0 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>09P</td><td>CDF p&#773;p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ABE</td><td>98V</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 09P</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>3 ACCIARRI</td><td>97B</td><td>L3 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 18T uses normalization modes $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (19.6 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-6}$ and $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.026 \pm 0.031) \times 10^{-3}$ with $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_d) = 0.259 \pm 0.015$. The upper limit increases to $6 \times 10^{-9}$ with the assumption of $B_L$-dominated decay amplitude.

2 Uses normalization mode $B(B^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = (19.4 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-6}$ and $B$ production ratio $f(\bar{b} \to B^0_S)/f(\bar{b} \to B^0_d) = 0.256 \pm 0.020$.

3 ACCIARRI 97B assume PDG 96 production fractions for $B^+, B^0, B_S$, and $\Lambda_b$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## $B_s^0$

$$ \Gamma(e^{\pm} \tau^{\mp})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{165}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.4 &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 NAYAK</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Reconstructs the accompanying $B_s^0$ meson in the semileptonic decay modes.

$$ \Gamma(\mu^{\pm} \tau^{\mp})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{166}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.2 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>95</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AK LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;7.3 &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></th><th>90</th><th>2 NAYAK</th><th>23</th><th>BELL</th><th>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td colspan="5">Assuming no contribution from $B_0^0$ &rarr; $\mu^{\pm} \tau^{\mp}$.</td></tr></tbody></table>

²Reconstructs the accompanying $B_s^0$ meson in the semileptonic decay modes.

$$ \Gamma(\phi^{\pm} e^{\mp})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{167}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6 &times; 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23G LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses the uniform phase space model for the signal decays.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\mu^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{168}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.21 &times; 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes that $B_s^0$ decay branching fractions to $p\mu^-$ and $p\bar{\mu}^+$ are the same.

## POLARIZATION IN $B_s^0$ DECAY

In decays involving two vector mesons, one can distinguish among the states in which meson polarizations are both longitudinal (L), or both are transverse and parallel (||), or perpendicular (⊥) to each other with the parameters $\Gamma_L/\Gamma$, $\Gamma_⊥/\Gamma$, and the relative phases $\phi_\parallel$ and $\phi_\perp$. In decays involving two tensor mesons, the transverse polarization states are described by parameters $\Gamma_\parallel$, $\Gamma_\perp$, $\Gamma_{1\perp}$, $\Gamma_{\perp 2}$, and their relative phases $\phi_\parallel 1$, $\phi_\parallel 2$, $\phi_\perp 1$, $\phi_\perp 2$. See also the review on "Polarization in B Decays."

$$ \Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to D_s^* \rho^+ \qquad \Gamma_{165}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.05<sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.04</sub></td><td>0.03</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>LOUVOT</td><td>10</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(5S)</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi \qquad \Gamma_{165}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.5194&plusmn;0.0034</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>0.5179&plusmn;0.0017</td><td>&plusmn;0.0032</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>24A LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.5152&plusmn;0.0012</td><td>&plusmn;0.0034</td><td>2 AAD</td><td>21AE ATLS</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.5289&plusmn;0.0038</td><td>&plusmn;0.0041</td><td>3 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.524&plusmn;0.013</td><td>&plusmn;0.015</td><td>3 AALTONEN</td><td>12D CDF</td><td>pP at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.558<sup>+0.017</sup><sub>-0.019</sub></td><td></td><td>3,4 ABAZOV</td><td>12D D0</td><td>pP at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.61&plusmn;0.14</td><td>&plusmn;0.02</td><td>5 AFFOLDER</td><td>00N CDF</td><td>pP at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.56&plusmn;0.21</td><td><sup>+0.02</sup><sub>-0.04</sub></td><td>ABE</td><td>95Z CDF</td><td>pP at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.5350&plusmn;0.0047</td><td>&plusmn;0.0049</td><td>3 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.5186&plusmn;0.0029</td><td>&plusmn;0.0023</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19Q LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 24A</td></tr><tr><td>0.522&plusmn;0.003</td><td>&plusmn;0.007</td><td>2 AAD</td><td>16AP ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 21AE</td></tr><tr><td>0.510&plusmn;0.005</td><td>&plusmn;0.011</td><td>3 KHACHATRY...16S</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.5241&plusmn;0.0034</td><td>&plusmn;0.0067</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15I LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 19Q</td></tr><tr><td>0.529&plusmn;0.006</td><td>&plusmn;0.012</td><td>2 AAD</td><td>14U ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 16AP</td></tr><tr><td>0.539&plusmn;0.014</td><td>&plusmn;0.016</td><td>3 AAD</td><td>12CV ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 14U</td></tr><tr><td>0.555&plusmn;0.027</td><td>&plusmn;0.006</td><td>6 ABAZOV</td><td>09E D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 12D</td></tr><tr><td>0.531&plusmn;0.020</td><td>&plusmn;0.007</td><td>3 AALTONEN</td><td>08J CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12D</td></tr><tr><td>0.62&plusmn;0.06</td><td>&plusmn;0.01</td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 08J</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><caption>WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.5194&plusmn;0.0034 (Error scaled by 1.5)</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.5350&plusmn;0.0047</td><td>&plusmn;0.0049</td><td>3 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.5186&plusmn;0.0029</td><td>&plusmn;0.0023</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19Q LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 24A</td></tr><tr><td>0.522&plusmn;0.003</td><td>&plusmn;0.007</td><td>2 AAD</td><td>16AP ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 21AE</td></tr><tr><td>0.510&plusmn;0.005</td><td>&plusmn;0.011</td><td>3 KHACHATRY...16S</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.5241&plusmn;0.0034</td><td>&plusmn;0.0067</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15I LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 19Q</td></tr><tr><td>0.529&plusmn;0.006</td><td>&plusmn;0.012</td><td>2 AAD</td><td>14U ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 16AP</td></tr><tr><td>0.539&plusmn;0.014</td><td>&plusmn;0.016</td><td>3 AAD</td><td>12CV ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 14U</td></tr><tr><td>0.555&plusmn;0.027</td><td>&plusmn;0.006</td><td>6 ABAZOV</td><td>09E D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 12D</td></tr><tr><td>0.531&plusmn;0.020</td><td>&plusmn;0.007</td><td>3 AALTONEN</td><td>08J CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12D</td></tr><tr><td>0.62&plusmn;0.06</td><td>&plusmn;0.01</td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 08J</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_641.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi \qquad \Gamma_{168}/\Gamma $$

¹Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

²Measured using the flavor tagged, time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

³Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

⁴The error includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

⁵AFFOLDER 00N measurements are based on 40 $B_s^0$ candidates obtained from a data sample of 89 $p\bar{p}$ $\to$ 1. The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.23 $\pm$ 0.19 $\pm$ 0.04.

⁶Measured the angular and lifetime parameters for the time-dependent angular untagged decays $B_d^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^0$ and $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$.

$$ \Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to D_s^* \bar{D}_s^* \qquad \Gamma_{165}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.06<sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.17</sub></td><td>0.03</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ESEN</td><td>13</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(5S)</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma_\parallel/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi \qquad \Gamma_{165}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.2222&plusmn;0.0027</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.2220&plusmn;0.0017</td><td>&plusmn;0.0021</td><td>1 AAD</td><td>21AE ATLS</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.231&plusmn;0.014</td><td>&plusmn;0.015</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12D CDF</td><td>pP at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.231&plusmn;0.024</td><td>&plusmn;0.030</td><td>2,3 ABAZOV</td><td>12D D0</td><td>pP at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.227&plusmn;0.004</td><td>&plusmn;0.006</td><td>1 AAD</td><td>16AP ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 21AE</td></tr><tr><td>0.220&plusmn;0.008</td><td>&plusmn;0.009</td><td>1 AAD</td><td>14U ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 16AP</td></tr><tr><td>0.224&plusmn;0.010</td><td>&plusmn;0.009</td><td>2 AAD</td><td>12CV ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 14U</td></tr><tr><td>0.244&plusmn;0.032</td><td>&plusmn;0.014</td><td>4 ABAZOV</td><td>09E D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 12D</td></tr><tr><td>0.230&plusmn;0.029</td><td>&plusmn;0.011</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>08J CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12D</td></tr><tr><td>0.260&plusmn;0.084</td><td>&plusmn;0.013</td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 08J</td></tr><tr><td>0.260&plusmn;0.084</td><td>&plusmn;0.013</td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 08J</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured using a tagged, time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

²Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

³The error includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

⁴Measured the angular and lifetime parameters for the time-dependent angular untagged decays $B_d^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^0$ and $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$.

$$ \Gamma_\perp/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi \qquad \Gamma_{165}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.2447&plusmn;0.0029</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.2463&plusmn;0.0023</td><td>&plusmn;0.0024</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>24A LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.2393&plusmn;0.0050</td><td>&plusmn;0.0037</td><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.2393&plusmn;0.0050</td><td>&plusmn;0.0037</td><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.2337&plusmn;0.0063</td><td>&plusmn;0.0045</td><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.2456&plusmn;0.0040</td><td>&plusmn;0.0019</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19Q LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 24A</td></tr><tr><td>0.243&plusmn;0.008</td><td>&plusmn;0.012</td><td>KHACHATRY...16S</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.2504&plusmn;0.0049</td><td>&plusmn;0.0036</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15I LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 19Q</td></tr><tr><td>0.2504&plusmn;0.0049</td><td>&plusmn;0.0036</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15I LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 19Q</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

$$ \Gamma_\parallel \text{ in } B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi \qquad \Gamma_{165}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (rad)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.22&plusmn;0.05</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.146&plusmn;0.061</td><td>&plusmn;0.052</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>24A LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.36&plusmn;0.05</td><td>&plusmn;0.09</td><td>2 AAD</td><td>21AE ATLS</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.19&plusmn;0.12</td><td>&plusmn;0.04</td><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.15&plusmn;0.22</td><td></td><td>3 ABAZOV</td><td>12D D0</td><td>pP at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.18&plusmn;0.12</td><td>&plusmn;0.003</td><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.06<sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.07</sub></td><td>&plusmn;0.04</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19Q LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 24A</td></tr><tr><td>3.15&plusmn;0.10</td><td>&plusmn;0.05</td><td>AAD</td><td>16AP ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 21AE</td></tr><tr><td>3.48&plusmn;0.07</td><td>&plusmn;0.06</td><td>KHACHATRY...16S</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.26&plusmn;0.10</td><td>&plusmn;0.06</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15I LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 19Q</td></tr><tr><td>2.72<sup>+1.12</sup><sub>-0.27</sub></td><td>&plusmn;0.26</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>09E D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 12D</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

²The fit found another solution with $\phi_\parallel = 2.95 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.09$ rad.

³The error includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

$$ \phi_\perp \text{ in } B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi \qquad \Gamma_{165}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (rad)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.99&plusmn;0.12</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.903<sup>+0.075</sup><sub>-0.074</sub></td><td>&plusmn;0.048</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>24A LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.32&plusmn;0.10</td><td>&plusmn;0.05</td><td>2 AAD</td><td>21AE ATLS</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.78&plusmn;0.15</td><td>&plusmn;0.06</td><td>3 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.77&plusmn;0.16</td><td>&plusmn;0.05</td><td>3 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.64&plusmn;0.13</td><td>&plusmn;0.10</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19Q LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 24A</td></tr><tr><td>4.15&plusmn;0.32</td><td>&plusmn;0.16</td><td>3 AAD</td><td>16AP ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 21AE</td></tr><tr><td>2.98&plusmn;0.36</td><td>&plusmn;0.66</td><td>3 KHACHATRY...16S</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.08<sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.15</sub></td><td>&plusmn;0.06</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15I LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 19Q</td></tr><tr><td>3.89&plusmn;0.47</td><td>&plusmn;0.11</td><td>3 AAD</td><td>14U ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 16AP</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.903<sup>+0.075</sup><sub>-0.074</sub></td><td>&plusmn;0.048</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>24A LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.32&plusmn;0.10</td><td>&plusmn;0.05</td><td>2 AAD</td><td>21AE ATLS</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.78&plusmn;0.15</td><td>&plusmn;0.06</td><td>3 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.77&plusmn;0.16</td><td>&plusmn;0.05</td><td>3 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.64&plusmn;0.13</td><td>&plusmn;0.10</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19Q LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 24A</td></tr><tr><td>4.15&plusmn;0.32</td><td>&plusmn;0.16</td><td>3 AAD</td><td>16AP ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 21AE</td></tr><tr><td>2.98&plusmn;0.36</td><td>&plusmn;0.66</td><td>3 KHACHATRY...16S</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.08<sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.15</sub></td><td>&plusmn;0.06</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15I LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 19Q</td></tr><tr><td>3.89&plusmn;0.47</td><td>&plusmn;0.11</td><td>3 AAD</td><td>14U ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 16AP</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

²The fit found another solution with $\phi_\perp = 3.03 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.09$ rad.
³ Measured using a tagged, time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
2.99±0.12 (Error scaled by 1.9)

<figure><img src="image_642.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma_{\perp}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi $$

$$ \frac{0.264 \pm 0.024}{-0.023 \pm 0.002} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ 1 & & & \end{array} $$

¹ Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi$ decays.

$$ \phi_{\parallel} \text{ in } B_s^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi $$

VALUE (rad)

$$ 3.67 \pm 0.13 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ 1 & & & \end{array} $$

¹ Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi$ decays.

$$ \phi_{\perp} \text{ in } B_s^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi $$

VALUE (rad)

$$ 3.29 \pm 0.43 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ 1 & & & \end{array} $$

¹ Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi$ decays.

$$ \Gamma_{L}/\Gamma \text{ for } B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\bar{K}^*(892)^0 $$

Longitudinal polarization fraction, equals to $f_L$ using notation of "Polarization in B decays" review.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{VALUE} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ 0.497 \pm 0.025 \pm 0.025 & & & \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{15AV} & \text{LHCB} & \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.50 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.02 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{1} & & & \end{array} $$

¹ The non-resonant $K\pi$ background contributions are subtracted. Also reports an S-wave amplitude $|A_S|^2 = 0.07^{+0.15}_{-0.07}$.

$$ \Gamma_{\parallel}/\Gamma \text{ for } B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\bar{K}^*(892)^0 $$

Parallel polarization fraction, equals to $1 - f_L - f_{\perp}$ using notation of "Polarization in B decays" review.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{VALUE} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ 0.179 \pm 0.027 \pm 0.013 & & & \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{15AV} & \text{LHCB} & \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.19 \pm 0.10 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{1} & & & \end{array} $$

¹ The non-resonant $K\pi$ background contributions are subtracted. Also reports an S-wave amplitude $|A_S|^2 = 0.07^{+0.15}_{-0.07}$.

$$ \Gamma_{\parallel}/\Gamma \text{ of } K^*(892)^0 \text{ in } B_s^0 \to \psi(2S)\bar{K}^*(892)^0 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{VALUE} & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ 0.524 \pm 0.056 \pm 0.029 & & & \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{15U} & \text{LHCB} & \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} \end{array} $$

$$ \Gamma_{L}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to \phi\phi $$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID
TECN
COMMENT

<table><tr><td>0.379 ± 0.008</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error Includes scale factor of 1.2.</td></tr><tr><td>0.384 ± 0.007 ± 0.003</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AT LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.364 ± 0.012 ± 0.009</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AE LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.348 ± 0.041 ± 0.021</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AN CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.381 ± 0.007 ± 0.012</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AP LHCB pp at 7, 8, partial 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.365 ± 0.022 ± 0.012</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12P LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 14AE</td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma_{\perp}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to \phi\phi $$

VALUE

0.310 ± 0.006 OUR AVERAGE

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ 0.310 \pm 0.006 \pm 0.003 & & & \\ 0.305 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.005 & & & \\ 0.365 \pm 0.044 \pm 0.027 & & & \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AT LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AE LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AN CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ 0.290 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.005 & & & \\ 0.291 \pm 0.024 \pm 0.010 & & & \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AP LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, partial 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>12P LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14AE</td></tr></table>

¹ Note: in the summary of AAIJ 19AP the systematic uncertainty is 0.007. We take the systematic uncertainty as given in Table 5 in the paper.

$$ \phi_{\parallel} \text{ in } B_s^0 \to \phi\phi $$

VALUE (rad)

2.469 ± 0.029 OUR AVERAGE

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ 2.463 \pm 0.029 \pm 0.009 & & & \\ 2.54 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.09 & & & \\ 2.71 \pm 0.31 \pm 0.36 & & & \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AT LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AE LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AN CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ 2.559 \pm 0.045 \pm 0.033 & & & \\ 2.57 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.06 & & & \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AP LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, partial 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12P LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14AE</td></tr></table>

¹ AAIJ 14AE reports measurement of $\phi_{\perp}$ and $\phi_{\parallel} - \phi_{\parallel}$, which we convert into $\phi_{\parallel}$. Statistical uncertainty includes correlation between measured parameters, while systematic uncertainties are assumed uncorrelated.

² AALTONEN 11AN quotes $\cos\phi_{\parallel} = -0.91 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.09$ which we convert to $\phi_{\parallel}$ taking the smaller solution.

³ AAIJ 12P quotes $\cos\phi_{\parallel} = -0.844 \pm 0.068 \pm 0.029$ which we convert to $\phi_{\parallel}$, taking the smaller solution.

$$ \phi_{\perp} \text{ in } B_s^0 \to \phi\phi $$

VALUE (rad)

2.75 ± 0.10 OUR AVERAGE

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ 2.769 \pm 0.105 \pm 0.011 & & & \\ 2.67 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.07 & & & \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AT LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AE LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 2.818 \pm 0.178 \pm 0.073 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{19AP LHCB} & \text{pp at 7, 8, partial 13 TeV} & \end{array} $$

$$ \Gamma_{L}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to K^*0\bar{K}^*0 $$

VALUE

$$ 0.240 \pm 0.031 \pm 0.025 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{1} & & & \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ 0.208 \pm 0.032 \pm 0.046 & & & \\ 0.201 \pm 0.057 \pm 0.040 & & & \\ 0.31 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.04 & & & \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{2} & & & \\ \text{3} & & & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{18S LHCB} & \text{Repl. by AAIJ 19L} & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{15AF LHCB} & \text{Repl. by AAIJ 18S} & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{12F LHCB} & \text{Repl. by AAIJ 15AF} & \end{array} $$

¹ Untagged and time-integrated analysis within 150 MeV of the $K^*0$ mass.

² Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

³ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-wave contributions.

$$ \Gamma_{\perp}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to K^*0\bar{K}^*0 $$

VALUE

$$ 0.38 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.04 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{12F} & \text{LHCB} & \text{pp at 7 TeV} \end{array} $$

$$ \phi_{\parallel} \text{ in } B_s^0 \to K^*(892)^0\bar{K}^*(892)^0 $$

VALUE

$$ 0.297 \pm 0.029 \pm 0.042 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{1} & & & \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.215 \pm 0.046 \pm 0.015 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{15AF LHCB} & \text{Repl. by AAIJ 18S} & \end{array} $$

¹ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

$$ \phi_{\parallel} \text{ in } B_s^0 \to K^*(892)^0\bar{K}^*(892)^0 $$

VALUE

$$ 2.40 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.33 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{1} & & & \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 5.31 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.14 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{15AF LHCB} & \text{Repl. by AAIJ 18S} & \end{array} $$

¹ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

$$ \phi_{\perp} \text{ in } B_s^0 \to K^*(892)^0\bar{K}^*(892)^0 $$

VALUE (rad)

$$ 2.62 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.64 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{1} & & & \end{array} $$

¹ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

$$ \Gamma_{L}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to \phi\bar{K}^*0 $$

VALUE

$$ 0.51 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.07 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{13BW} & \text{LHCB} & \text{pp at 7 TeV} \end{array} $$

$$ \phi_{\parallel}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_s^0 \to \phi\bar{K}^*0 $$

VALUE

$$ 0.21 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.02 $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ \text{AAIJ} & \text{13BW} & \text{LHCB} & \text{pp at 7 TeV} \end{array} $$
# Meson Particle Listings

## B<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>

$$ \phi_{\parallel} \text{ in } B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow \phi \bar{K}^{*0} $$

VALUE (rad)

$$ 1.75 \pm 0.53 \pm 0.29 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13BW</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measures $\cos(\phi_{\parallel}) = -0.18 \pm 0.52 \pm 0.29$, which we convert to $\phi_{\parallel}$ by taking the smaller solution.

$$ \Gamma_{L/\Gamma} \text{ in } B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow \bar{D}^{*0} \phi $$

VALUE

$$ 0.531 \pm 0.060 \pm 0.019 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AZ</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.73 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.04 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AY</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 23AZ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma_{L/\Gamma} \text{ in } B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow K^{*}(892)^{0} \bar{K}_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} $$

VALUE

$$ 0.911 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.165 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

$$ \Gamma_{\parallel}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow K^{*}(892)^{0} \bar{K}_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} $$

VALUE

$$ 0.012 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.053 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

$$ \Gamma_{L/\Gamma} \text{ in } B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow K_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} \bar{K}^{*}(892)^{0} $$

VALUE

$$ 0.62 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.25 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

$$ \Gamma_{\parallel}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow K_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} \bar{K}^{*}(892)^{0} $$

VALUE

$$ 0.24 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.14 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

$$ \Gamma_{L/\Gamma} \text{ in } B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow K_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} \bar{K}_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} $$

VALUE

$$ 0.25 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.18 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

$$ \Gamma_{\parallel 1}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow K_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} \bar{K}_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} $$

VALUE

$$ 0.17 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.14 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

$$ \Gamma_{\perp 1}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow K_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} \bar{K}_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} $$

VALUE

$$ 0.30 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.21 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

$$ \Gamma_{\parallel 2}/\Gamma \text{ in } B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow K_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} \bar{K}_{2}^{*}(1430)^{0} $$

VALUE

$$ 0.015 \pm 0.033 \pm 0.107 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in angular analysis, which takes into account S-, P- and D-wave contributions.

$$ \Gamma_{L}(B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow \phi\mu^{+}\mu^{-}) \text{ (0.10} < q^{2} < 2.00 \text{ GeV}^{2}/\text{c}^{4}) $$

VALUE

$$ 0.20 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.02 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AQ</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.37 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.07 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13X</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma_{L}(B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow \phi\mu^{+}\mu^{-}) \text{ (2.00} < q^{2} < 5.0 \text{ GeV}^{2}/\text{c}^{4}) $$

VALUE

$$ 0.68 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.03 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AQ</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.53 \pm 0.25 \pm 0.10 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13X</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in 2.0 < q² < 4.3 GeV²/c⁴.

$$ \Gamma_{L}(B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow \phi\mu^{+}\mu^{-}) \text{ (5.0} < q^{2} < 8.0 \text{ GeV}^{2}/\text{c}^{4}) $$

VALUE

$$ 0.54 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.02 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AQ</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.81 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.05 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13X</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in 4.3 < q² < 8.68 GeV²/c⁴.

$$ \Gamma_{L}(B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow \phi\mu^{+}\mu^{-}) \text{ (11.0} < q^{2} < 12.5 \text{ GeV}^{2}/\text{c}^{4}) $$

VALUE

$$ 0.29 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.04 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AQ</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.33 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.06 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13X</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in 10.09 < q² < 12.90 GeV²/c⁴.

$$ \Gamma_{L}(B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow \phi\mu^{+}\mu^{-}) \text{ (15.0} < q^{2} < 17.0 \text{ GeV}^{2}/\text{c}^{4}) $$

VALUE

$$ 0.23 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.02 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AQ</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.34 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.07 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13X</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in 14.18 < q² < 16 GeV²/c⁴.

$$ \Gamma_{L}(B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow \phi\mu^{+}\mu^{-}) \text{ (17.0} < q^{2} < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^{2}/\text{c}^{4}) $$

VALUE

$$ 0.40 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.02 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AQ</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.16 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.07 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13X</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in 16.0 < q² < 19.0 GeV²/c⁴.

$$ \Gamma_{L}(B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow \phi\mu^{+}\mu^{-}) \text{ (15.0} < q^{2} < 18.9 \text{ GeV}^{2}/\text{c}^{4}) $$

VALUE

$$ 0.359 \pm 0.031 \pm 0.019 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21AK</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma_{L}(B_{S}^{0} \rightarrow \phi\mu^{+}\mu^{-}) \text{ (1.00} < q^{2} < 6.00 \text{ GeV}^{2}/\text{c}^{4}) $$

VALUE

$$ 0.715 \pm 0.036 \pm 0.013 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>21AK</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.63 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.03 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AQ</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 21AK</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ 0.56 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.09 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13X</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

## B<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>-B<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> MIXING

For a discussion of $B_{S}^{0}-\bar{B}_{S}^{0}$ mixing see the note on "$B^{0}-\bar{B}^{0}$ Mixing" in the $B^{0}$ Particle Listings above.

$\chi_{S}$ is a measure of the time-integrated $B_{S}^{0}-\bar{B}_{S}^{0}$ mixing probability that produced $B_{S}^{0}(\bar{B}_{S}^{0})$ decays as a $\bar{B}_{S}^{0}(B_{S}^{0})$. Mixing violates $\Delta B \neq 2$ rule.

$$ \chi_{S} = \frac{x_{S}^{2}}{2(1+x_{S}^{2})} $$

$$ x_S = \frac{\Delta m_{B_S^0}}{\Gamma_{B_S^0}} = (m_{B_{SH}^0} - m_{B_{SL}^0}) \tau_{B_S^0} $$

where H, L stand for heavy and light states of two $B_{S}^{0}$ CP eigenstates and $\tau_{B_{S}^{0}} = \frac{0.5(1+\Gamma_{B_{SH}^{0}}-\Gamma_{B_{SL}^{0}})}{\tau_{B_{S}^{0}}}$.

$$ \Delta m_{B_S^0} = m_{B_{SH}^0} - m_{B_{SL}^0} $$

$\Delta m_{B_S^0}$ is a measure of 2π times the $B_{S}^{0}-\bar{B}_{S}^{0}$ oscillation frequency in time-dependent mixing experiments.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>12</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>17.765</td><td>±0.006</td><td>OUR EVALUATION</td><td></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr><tr><td>17.765</td><td>±0.005</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>17.743</td><td>±0.033</td><td>±0.009</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>24A LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>17.7683</td><td>±0.0051</td><td>±0.0032</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>22B LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>17.757</td><td>±0.007</td><td>±0.008</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>21M LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>17.51</td><td>±0.10</td><td>±0.03</td><td>4 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>17.768</td><td>±0.023</td><td>±0.006</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>13BI LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>17.93</td><td>±0.22</td><td>±0.15</td><td>5 AAIJ</td><td>13CF LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>17.77</td><td>±0.10</td><td>±0.07</td><td>6 ABULENCIA, A 06G</td><td>CDF p&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>17.703</td><td>±0.059</td><td>±0.018</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19Q LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 24A</td></tr><tr><td>17.711</td><td>±0.055</td><td>±0.011</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15I LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 19Q</td></tr><tr><td>17.63</td><td>±0.11</td><td>±0.02</td><td>7 AAIJ</td><td>12I LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 21M</td></tr><tr><td>17-21</td><td></td><td>90</td><td>8 ABAZOV</td><td>06B D0 p&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>17.31</td><td>±0.33</td><td>±0.07</td><td>9 ABULENCIA</td><td>06Q CDF Repl. by ABULENCIA, A 06G</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 8.0</td><td>95</td><td>10 ABDALLAH</td><td>04J DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 4.9</td><td>95</td><td>11 ABDALLAH</td><td>04J DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 8.5</td><td>95</td><td>12 ABDALLAH</td><td>04J DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 5.0</td><td>95</td><td>13 ABDALLAH</td><td>03B DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt;10.3</td><td>95</td><td>14 ABE</td><td>03 SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt;10.9</td><td>95</td><td>15 HEISTER</td><td>03E ALEP e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 5.3</td><td>95</td><td>16 ABE</td><td>02V SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 1.0</td><td>95</td><td>17 ABBIENDI</td><td>01D OPAL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 7.4</td><td>95</td><td>18 ABREU</td><td>00Y DLPH Repl. by ABDALLAH 04J</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 4.0</td><td>95</td><td>19 ABREU, P</td><td>00G DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 5.2</td><td>95</td><td>20 ABBIENDI</td><td>99S OPAL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;96</td><td>95</td><td>21 ABE</td><td>99D CDF p&#773; at 1.8 TeV</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 5.8</td><td>95</td><td>22 ABE</td><td>99J CDF p&#773; at 1.8 TeV</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><tbody><tr><td>&gt; 9.6</td><td>95</td><td>23 BARATE</td><td>99J ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 7.9</td><td>95</td><td>24 BARATE</td><td>98C ALEP</td><td>Repl. by BARATE 99J</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 3.1</td><td>95</td><td>25 ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97U OPAL</td><td>Repl. by ABBIENDI 99S</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 2.2</td><td>95</td><td>26 ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97V OPAL</td><td>Repl. by ABBIENDI 99S</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 6.5</td><td>95</td><td>27 ADAM</td><td>97 DLPH</td><td>Repl. by ABREU 00Y</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 6.6</td><td>95</td><td>28 BUSKULIC</td><td>96M ALEP</td><td>Repl. by BARATE 98C</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 2.2</td><td>95</td><td>26 AKERS</td><td>95J OPAL</td><td>Sup. by ACKERSTAFF 97V</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 5.7</td><td>95</td><td>29 BUSKULIC</td><td>95J ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 1.8</td><td>95</td><td>26 BUSKULIC</td><td>94B ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

²Measured using $B_S^0 \to D_S^- \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays.

³Measured using $B_S^0 \to D_S^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays.

⁴Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi \phi$ decays.

⁵Measured using $B_S^0 \to D_S^- \mu^+ \nu_\mu X$ decays.

⁶Significance of oscillation signal is 5.4 $\sigma$. Also reports $|V_{td}/V_{ts}| = 0.2060 \pm 0.0007 \pm 0.0081$.

⁷Measured using $B_S^0 \to D_S^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays.

⁸A likelihood scan over the oscillation frequency, $\Delta m_s$, gives a most probable value of 19 ps⁻¹ and a range of 17 < $\Delta m_s$ < 21 (ps⁻¹) at 90% C.L. assuming Gaussian uncertainties. Also excludes $\Delta m_s < 14.8$ ps⁻¹ at 95% C.L.

⁹Significance of oscillation signal is 0.2%. Also reported the value $|V_{td}/V_{ts}| = 0.208 \pm 0.001 \pm 0.008$.

¹⁰Uses leptons emitted with large momentum transverse to a jet and improved techniques for vertexing and flavor-tagging.

¹¹Updates of $D_S$-lepton analysis.

¹²Combined results from all Delphi analyses.

¹³Events with a high transverse momentum lepton were removed and an inclusively reconstructed vertex was required.

¹⁴ABE 03 uses the novel “charge dipole” technique to reconstruct separate secondary and tertiary vertices originating from the $B \to D$ decay chain. The analysis excludes $\Delta m_S < 4.9$ ps⁻¹ and $7.9 < \Delta m_S < 10.3$ ps⁻¹.

¹⁵Three analyses based on complementary event selections: (1) fully-reconstructed hadronic decays; (2) semileptonic decays with $D_S$ exclusively reconstructed; (3) inclusive semileptonic decays.

¹⁶ABE 02v uses exclusively reconstructed $D_S^-$ mesons and excludes $\Delta m_S < 1.4$ ps⁻¹ and $2.4 < \Delta m_S < 5.3$ ps⁻¹ at 95%CL.

¹⁷Uses fully or partially reconstructed $D_S^\ell$ vertices and a mixing tag as a flavor tagging.

¹⁸Replaced by ABDALLAH 04A. Uses $D_S^\ell \ell^+$, and $\phi \ell^+$ vertices, and a multi-variable discriminant as a flavor tagging.

¹⁹Uses inclusive $D_S$ vertices and fully reconstructed $B_S$ decays and a multi-variable discriminant as a flavor tagging.

²⁰Uses $\ell$-$Q_{\text{hem}}$ and $\ell$-$\ell$.

²¹ABE 99D assumes $\tau_{B_S^0} = 1.55 \pm 0.05$ ps and $\Delta\Gamma/\Delta m = (5.6 \pm 2.6) \times 10^{-3}$.

²²ABE 99J uses $\phi \ell$-$\ell$ correlation.

²³BARATE 99J uses combination of an inclusive lepton and $D_S^-$-based analyses.

²⁴BARATE 98C combines results from $D_S^\ell h$-$\ell/Q_{\text{hem}}$, $D_S^\ell h$-$\kappa$ in the same side, $D_S^\ell \ell/Q_{\text{hem}}$ and $D_S^\ell \ell$-$\kappa$ in the same side.

²⁵Uses $\ell$-$Q_{\text{hem}}$.

²⁶Uses $\ell$-$\ell$.

²⁷ADAM 97 combines results from $D_S^\ell \ell$-$Q_{\text{hem}}$, $\ell$-$Q_{\text{hem}}$, and $\ell$-$\ell$.

²⁸BUSKULIC 96M uses $D_S$ lepton correlations and lepton, kaon, and jet charge tags.

²⁹BUSKULIC 95J uses $\ell$-$Q_{\text{hem}}$. They find $\Delta m_S > 5.6$ [$> 6.1$] for $f_S = 10\%$ [12%]. We interpolate to our central value $f_S = 10.5\%$.

$$x_S = \Delta m_{B_S^0} / \Gamma_{B_S^0}$$

Derived from the results on $\Delta m_{B_S^0}$ and “OUR EVALUATION” of the $B_S^0$ mean lifetime.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>26.99±0.09</td><td>OUR EVALUATION (Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

x_S

This is a $B_S^0/B_S^0$ integrated mixing parameter derived from $x_S$ above and OUR EVALUATION of $\Delta\Gamma_{B_S^0/B_S^0}$.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.499318±0.000005</td><td>OUR EVALUATION (Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

## CP VIOLATION PARAMETERS in $B_S^0$

$$\text{Re}(\epsilon_{B_S^0}) / (1 + |\epsilon_{B_S^0}|^2)$$

CP impurity in $B_S^0$ system.

“OUR EVALUATION” is the result of a fit to $B_d$ and $B_S^0$ CP asymmetries, which includes the $B_S^0$ measurements listed below and the $B_d$ measurements listed in the $B_d$ section, and takes into account correlations between those measurements.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.15±0.70</td><td>OUR EVALUATION</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0 ± 1.1</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.98±0.65±0.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16G LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-2.15±1.85</td><td>2 ABAZOV</td><td>14 D0</td><td>p p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-2.8 ± 1.9 ± 0.4</td><td>3 ABAZOV</td><td>13 D0</td><td>p p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.15±1.25±0.90</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>14D LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 16G</td></tr><tr><td>-4.5 ± 2.7</td><td>5 ABAZOV</td><td>11U D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 14</td></tr><tr><td>-0.4 ± 2.3 ± 0.4</td><td>6 ABAZOV</td><td>10E D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 13</td></tr><tr><td>-3.6 ± 1.9</td><td>7 ABAZOV</td><td>10H D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 11U</td></tr><tr><td>6.1 ± 4.8 ± 0.9</td><td>8 ABAZOV</td><td>07A D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 10E</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 16G reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in $B_S^0 \to \mu^+ D_S^- X$ decays, $A_{SL}^S = (0.39 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.20)\%$, which is approximately equal to $4 \times \text{Re}(\epsilon_{B_S^0}) / (1 + |\epsilon_{B_S^0}|^2)$.

²ABAZOV 14 uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports $A_{SL}^S = (-0.86 \pm 0.74) \times 10^{-2}$.

³ABAZOV 13 reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in mixed semileptonic $B_S^0 \to \mu^+ D_S^- X$ decays $A_{SL}^S = (-1.12 \pm 0.74 \pm 0.17)\%$ which is approximately equal to $4 \times \text{Re}(\epsilon_{B_S^0}) / (1 + |\epsilon_{B_S^0}|^2)$.

⁴AAIJ 14D reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in $B_S^0 \to \mu^+ D_S^- X$ decays, $A_{SL}^S = (-0.06 \pm 0.50 \pm 0.36)\%$, which is approximately equal to $4 \times \text{Re}(\epsilon_{B_S^0}) / (1 + |\epsilon_{B_S^0}|^2)$.

⁵ABAZOV 11U uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports $A_{SL}^S = (-18.1 \pm 10.6) \times 10^{-3}$.

⁶ABAZOV 10E reports a measurement of flavor-specific asymmetry in $B_{(S)}^0 \to \mu^+ D_{(S)}^- X$ decays with a decay-time analysis including initial-state flavor tagging, $A_{SL}^S = (-1.7 \pm 9.1 \pm 1.4) \times 10^{-3}$ which is approximately equal to $4 \times \text{Re}(\epsilon_{B_S^0}) / (1 + |\epsilon_{B_S^0}|^2)$.

⁷ABAZOV 10H reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of $A_{SL}^S = (-9.57 \pm 2.51 \pm 1.46) \times 10^{-3}$ in semileptonic b-hadron decays. Using the measured production ratio of $B_S^0$ and $B_d^0$, and the asymmetry of $B_S^0 A_{SL}^S = (-4.7 \pm 4.6) \times 10^{-3}$ measured from B-factories, they obtain the asymmetry for $B_S^0$.

⁸The first direct measurement of the time integrated flavor untagged charge asymmetry in semileptonic $B_S^0$ decays is reported as $2 \times A_{SL}^S$ (untagged) = $A_{SL}^S = (2.45 \pm 1.93 \pm 0.35) \times 10^{-2}$.

## WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.0±1.1 (Error scaled by 1.6)

<figure><img src="image_643.png" /></figure>

$$C_K K(B_S^0 \to K^+ K^-)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.162±0.035</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.164±0.034±0.014</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>210 LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.14 ± 0.11 ± 0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13B0 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$S_K K(B_S^0 \to K^+ K^-)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.14 ± 0.05</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.123±0.034±0.015</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>210 LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.30 ± 0.12 ± 0.04</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13B0 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$\tau_B(B_S^0 \to D_S^\mp K^\pm)$$

$\tau_B$ and $\tau_D$ are the amplitude ratio and relative strong phase between the amplitudes of $A(B_S^0 \to D_S^\mp K^-)$ and $A(B_S^0 \to D_S^\mp K^+)$,

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.37±0.10</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18U LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>0.53±0.17</th><th>2 AAIJ</th><th>14Br LHCB</th><th>Repl. by AAIJ 18U</th></tr></thead></table>

¹Measured in $B_S^0 \to D_S^\mp K^\pm$ decays, constraining $-0.030 \pm 0.033$ from HFLAV.

²Measured in $B_S^0 \to D_S^\mp K^\pm$ decays, constraining $-0.01 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.0$ from AAIJ 13AR. At 68% CL.
# Meson Particle Listings

$$B_s^0$$

$$r_B(B_s^0 \to D_s^\mp K^\pm \pi^\pm \pi^\mp)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.47±0.08<sup>+0.02</sup><sub>-0.03</sub></td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>21M LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Measured in restricted phase space with $m(K^+\pi^+\pi^-) < 1950$ MeV, $m(K^+\pi^-) < 1200$ MeV and $m(\pi^+\pi^-) < 1200$ MeV.

2. A model-independent coherence factor for the decay $B_S \to D_S K\pi\pi$ (in the restricted phase space region) is also reported.

$$\delta_B(B_s^0 \to D_s^\pm K^\mp)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (°)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>358<sup>+13</sup><sub>-14</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18U LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

3<sup>+19</sup><sub>-20</sub> 2 AAIJ 14BF LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 18U

1. Measured in $B_S^0 \to D_S^\mp K^\pm$ decays, constraining $-2\beta_S$ by the measurement of $\phi_S = 0.030 \pm 0.033$ from HFLAV. The value is modulo 180°.

2. Measured in $B_S^0 \to D_S^\mp K^\pm$ decays, constraining $-2\beta_S$ by the measurement of $\phi_S = 0.01 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.0$ from AAIJ 13AR. The value is modulo 180° at 68% CL.

$$\delta_B(B_s^0 \to D_s^\pm K^\mp \pi^\pm \pi^\mp)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (°)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-6<sup>+10+2</sup><sub>-12-4</sub></td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>21M LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Measured in restricted phase space with $m(K^+\pi^+\pi^-) < 1950$ MeV, $m(K^+\pi^-) < 1200$ MeV and $m(\pi^+\pi^-) < 1200$ MeV. The value is modulo 180°.

2. A model-independent coherence factor for the decay $B_S \to D_S K\pi\pi$ (in the restricted phase space region) is also reported.

## CP Violation phase $\beta_S$ ($b \to c\bar{c}S$)

$-2\beta_S$ is the weak phase difference between $B_S^0$ mixing amplitude and the $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decay amplitude driven by the $b \to c\bar{c}S$ transition (such as $B_S \to J/\psi\phi$, $J/\psi K^+K^-$, $J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$, and $D_S^+D_S^-$). The Standard Model value of $\beta_S$ is arg($-\frac{V_{ts}V_{ts}^*}{V_{cs}V_{cb}^*}$) if penguin contributions are neglected.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-2</sup> rad)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2.0 ± 0.8</strong> OUR EVALUATION<br>(Produced by HFLAV)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>1.8 ± 0.8</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.9 ± 1.1 ± 0.3</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>24A LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>4.05 ± 2.05±1.10</td><td>2,3 AAD</td><td>21AE ATLS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0 ± 14 ± 4</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>21AN LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.5 ± 2.5 ± 0.5</td><td>5.6 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.85 ± 3.00±0.55</td><td>7.8 AAIJ</td><td>19AF LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-5.95 ± 5.35±1.70</td><td>9 AAIJ</td><td>17V LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5.05 ± 4.05±2.10</td><td>10,11 AAD</td><td>16AP ATLS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-11.5<sup>+14</sup><sub>-14.5</sub> ± 1</td><td>12 AAIJ</td><td>16AK LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.75 ± 4.85±1.55</td><td>13 KHACHATRY...16S CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.9 ± 2.5 ± 0.3</td><td>14 AAIJ</td><td>15I LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-6 ± 13 ± 3</td><td>15 AAD</td><td>14U ATLS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-1 ± 9 ± 1</td><td>16 AAIJ</td><td>14AY LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-3.5 ± 3.4 ± 0.4</td><td>17 AAIJ</td><td>14S LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>18 AALTONEN</td><td>12AJ CDF</td><td>pT at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>28<sup>+18</sup><sub>-19</sub></td><td>19 ABAZOV</td><td>12D D0</td><td>pT at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.15 ± 2.05±0.30</td><td>20 AAIJ</td><td>19Q LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 24A</td></tr><tr><td>5.0 ± 6.5 ± 7.0</td><td>21 AAIJ</td><td>18s LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6<sup>+8</sup><sub>-7</sub></td><td>22,23 AAIJ</td><td>15k LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.5 ± 3.5 ± 0.5</td><td>24 AAIJ</td><td>13AR LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 15I</td></tr><tr><td>-11.0 ± 20.5 ± 5.0</td><td>25 AAD</td><td>12CV ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 14U</td></tr><tr><td>22 ± 22 ± 1</td><td>26 AAIJ</td><td>12B LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 12Q</td></tr><tr><td>-8 ± 9 ± 3</td><td>27 AAIJ</td><td>12D LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13AR</td></tr><tr><td>0.95<sup>+8.70</sup><sub>-8.65</sub> ± 0.15</td><td>28 AAIJ</td><td>12Q LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13AR</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>29 AALTONEN</td><td>12D CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12AJ</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>30 AALTONEN</td><td>08G CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12D</td></tr><tr><td>28<sup>+12</sup><sub>-15</sub> ± 4<sup>-1</sup></td><td>19,31 ABAZOV</td><td>08AM D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 12D</td></tr><tr><td>39.5 ± 28.0<sup>+0.5</sup><sub>-7.0</sub></td><td>32,33 ABAZOV</td><td>07 D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 07N</td></tr><tr><td>35<sup>+20</sup><sub>-24</sub></td><td>33,34 ABAZOV</td><td>07N D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 08AM</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. AAIJ 19Q reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.039 \pm 0.022 \pm 0.006$ rad. measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+K^-$ decays.

2. Reports a combination of 0.0435 ± 0.0180 ± 0.0105 with AAD 16AP.

3. AAD 21AE measured $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.087 \pm 0.036 \pm 0.021$ rad. using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

4. AAIJ 21AN measured $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = 0.00 \pm 0.28 \pm 0.07$ rad, using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays with $J/\psi \to e^+e^-$.

5. Reports a combination of 0.0105 ± 0.0220 ± 0.0050 with KHACHATRYAN 16S.

6. SIRUNYAN 21E measured $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.021 \pm 0.044 \pm 0.010$ rad. using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

7. Reports a combination of $-0.001 \pm 0.022 \pm 0.006$ with AAIJ 14S.

8. AAIJ 19AF reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = 0.002 \pm 0.044 \pm 0.012$ rad. and $|\lambda| = 0.949 \pm 0.036 \pm 0.019$, when direct CP violation is allowed. Measured using a time-dependent fit to $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

9. Measured $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = 0.119 \pm 0.107 \pm 0.034$ rad using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+K^-$ in the region $m(KK) > 1.05$ GeV.

10. Reports a combination of 0.0435 ± 0.0180 ± 0.0105 with AAD 14U.

11. AAD 16AP reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.090 \pm 0.078 \pm 0.041$ rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

12. AAIJ 16AK reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = 0.23^{+0.29}_{-0.28} \pm 0.02$ rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi$ decays.

13. KHACHATRYAN 16S reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.075 \pm 0.097 \pm 0.031$ rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

14. AAIJ 15I reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.058 \pm 0.049 \pm 0.006$ rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+K^-$ decays. It also combines this result with that of AAIJ 14S and quotes $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.010 \pm 0.039$ rad.

15. AAD 14U reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = 0.12 \pm 0.25 \pm 0.05$ rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

16. AAIJ 14AY reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = 0.02 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.02$ rad. in a time-dependent fit to $B_S^0 \to D_S^+D_S^-$, while allowing CP violation in decay.

17. AAIJ 14S reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = 0.070 \pm 0.068 \pm 0.008$ rad. and $|\lambda| = 0.89 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.01$, when direct CP violation is allowed. Measured using a time-dependent fit to $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

18. AALTONEN 12AJ reports $-\pi/2 < \beta_S < -1.51$ or $-0.06 < \beta_S < 0.30$, or $1.26 < \beta_S < \pi/2$ rad. at 68% CL. Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

19. ABAZOV 12D reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.55^{+0.38}_{-0.36}$ rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays. A single error includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

20. AAIJ 19Q reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.083 \pm 0.041 \pm 0.006$ rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+K^-$ decays.

21. AAIJ 18S reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.10 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.14$ rad measured in $B_S^0 \to (K^+\pi^-)(K^-\pi^+)\pi^-$ in the region $0.75 < m(K^\pm\pi^-) < 1.6$ GeV. This is a $b \to d\bar{d}s$ transition with a decay amplitude phase different from that of $b \to c\bar{c}S$ transition.

22. AAIJ 15K reports $-2\beta_S = -0.12^{+0.14}_{-0.16}$ rad. The value was obtained by measuring time-dependent CP asymmetry in $B_S^0 \to K^+K^-$ and using a U-spin relation between $B_S^0 \to K^+K^-$ and $B_S^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-$.

23. Results are also presented using additional inputs on $B^0 \to \pi^0\pi^0$ and $B^+ \to \pi^+\pi^0$ decays from other experiments and isospin symmetry assumptions. The dependence of the results on the maximum allowed amount of U-spin breaking up to 50% is also included.

24. AAIJ 13AR reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = 0.01 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.01$ rad. obtained from combined fit to $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+K^-$ and $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ data sets. Also reports separate results of $\phi_S = 0.07 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.01$ rad. from $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+K^-$ decays and $\phi_S = -0.14^{+0.17}_{-0.16} \pm 0.01$ rad. from $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

25. AAD 12CV reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = 0.22 \pm 0.41 \pm 0.10$ rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

26. Reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.44 \pm 0.44 \pm 0.02$ rad. that was measured using a time-dependent fit to $B_S^0 \to J/\psi f_0(980)$ decays.

27. Reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = 0.15 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.06$ rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

28. Reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S = -0.019^{+0.173}_{-0.174} \pm 0.004$ rad. which was measured using a time-dependent fit to $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays, with the $\pi^+\pi^-$ mass within 775-1550 MeV. Searches for, but finds no evidence, for direct CP violation in $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\pi\pi$ decays.

29. Reports 0.02 < $\phi_S < 0.52$ or $1.08 < \phi_S < 1.55$ rad. at 68% C.L. confidence regions in the two-dimensional space of $\phi_S$ and $\Delta\Gamma B_S^0$ from $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

30. Reports 0.32 < $\beta_S < 2.82$ rad. at 68% C.L. and confidence regions in the two-dimensional space of $\beta_S$ and $\Delta\Gamma$ from the first measurement of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays using flavor tagging. The probability of a deviation from SM prediction as large as the level of observed data is 15%.

31. Reports $\phi_S = -2\beta_S$ and obtains 90% CL interval $-0.03 < \beta_S < 0.60$ rad.

32. The first direct measurement of the CP-violating mixing phase is reported from the time-dependent analysis of flavor untagged $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

33. Reports $\phi_S$ which equals to $-2\beta_S$.

34. Combines D0 collaboration measurements of time-dependent angular distributions in $B_S^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ and charge asymmetry in semileptonic decays. There is a 4-fold ambiguity in the solution.

## CP Violation phase $\beta_S$ ($b \to s\bar{c}S$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-2</sup> rad)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>3.7 ±3.5</strong></td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>23AT LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.1 ±3.8±0.5</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>33AT LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.7 ±5.8±1.4</td><td>4,5 AAIJ</td><td>19AP LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 23AT</td></tr><tr><td>8.5 ±7.5±1.5</td><td>6 AAIJ</td><td>14AE LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 19AP</td></tr><tr><td>0.38 to 1.23</td><td>7 AAIJ</td><td>13AY LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14AE</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. AAIJ 23AT reports $\phi_S^{s\bar{s}} = -0.074 \pm 0.069$ rad and $|\lambda| = 1.009 \pm 0.030$. Measured using a time-dependent fit to $B_S^0 \to \phi\phi$ decays, assuming independence of the helicity of the $\phi\phi$ decay.
²AAIJ 23AT also reports polarisation-dependent results assuming that the longitudinal weak phase is CP-conserving and that there is no direct CP violation.

³Measured using a time-dependent fit to $B_s^0 \to \phi\phi$ decays, assuming independence of the helicity of the $\phi\phi$ decay.

⁴AAIJ 19AP reports $\phi S_s^{\bar{3}S} = -0.073 \pm 0.115 \pm 0.027$ rad and $|\lambda| = 0.99 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.01$. Measured using a time-dependent fit to $B_s^0 \to \phi\phi$ decays, assuming independence of the helicity of the $\phi\phi$ decay.

⁵AAIJ 19AP reports also polarisation-dependent results assuming that the longitudinal weak phase is CP-conserving and that there is no direct CP violation, giving $\phi S_s^{\bar{3}S} = 0.014 \pm 0.055 \pm 0.011$ rad and $\phi S_s^{\bar{3}S} = 0.044 \pm 0.059 \pm 0.019$ rad.

⁶AAIJ 14AE value measured in $B_s^0 \to \phi\phi$ decays. Also reports $\phi S_s^{\bar{3}S} = -0.17 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.03$ rad.

⁷AAIJ 13AY uses $B_s^0 \to \phi\phi$ mode, and reports the 68% CL interval of $\phi S_s^{\bar{3}S} = -2 \beta S_s^{\bar{3}S}$ as $[-2.46, -0.76]$ rad.

$|\lambda| (B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)$

**0.988 \pm 0.009 OUR AVERAGE**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.990 \pm 0.010

AAIJ 24A LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

0.972 \pm 0.026 \pm 0.008

¹SIRUNYAN 21E CMS pp at 13 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.877 \pm 0.112 \pm 0.031

AAIJ 21AN LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 24A

1.012 \pm 0.016 \pm 0.006

AAIJ 19Q LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 24A

0.964 \pm 0.019 \pm 0.007

AAIJ 15I LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 24A

0.93 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.02

AAIJ 13AR LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15I

¹Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

$|\lambda| (b \to c\bar{S}^c)$

$\lambda = q/p \cdot A_F / A_F$ is a phase-convention-independent observable quantity for the final state $f$. See the review on "CP Violation in the Quark Sector" for details.

**0.989 \pm 0.008 OUR AVERAGE**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.990 \pm 0.010

¹AAIJ 24A LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

0.972 \pm 0.026 \pm 0.008

²SIRUNYAN 21E CMS pp at 13 TeV

0.949 \pm 0.036 \pm 0.019

³AAIJ 19AF LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

0.994 \pm 0.018 \pm 0.006

⁴AAIJ 17V LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1.045 \pm 0.069 \pm 0.007

⁵AAIJ 16AK LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

0.91 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.02

⁶AAIJ 14AY LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.004 \pm 0.030 \pm 0.009

⁷AAIJ 23AT LHCB pp at 13 TeV

1.009 \pm 0.030

⁷AAIJ 23AT LHCB pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV

0.877 \pm 0.112 \pm 0.031

⁸AAIJ 21AN LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 24A

0.99 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.01

⁷AAIJ 19AP LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 23AT

1.012 \pm 0.016 \pm 0.006

⁸AAIJ 19Q LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 24A

1.035 \pm 0.034 \pm 0.089

⁸S 18S LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

0.964 \pm 0.019 \pm 0.007

⁸AAIJ 15I LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 24A

1.04 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.03

⁷AAIJ 14AE LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 19AP

0.93 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.02

⁸AAIJ 13AR LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15I

¹Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ in the region $m(KK)$ in the vicinity of the $\phi(1020)$ resonance.

²Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

³Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

⁴Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ in the region $m(KK) > 1.05$ GeV.

⁵Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi$ decays.

⁶Measured in $B_s^0 \to D_s^+ D_s^-$ decays.

⁷Measured in $B_s^0 \to \phi\phi$ decays.

⁸Measured in $B_s^0 \to (K^+\pi^-)(K^-\pi^+)$ in the region $0.75 < m(K^\pm\pi^\mp) < 1.6$ GeV.

A, CP violation parameter

$A = -2 \text{Re}(\lambda) / (1 + |\lambda|^2)$

**-0.79 \pm 0.08 OUR AVERAGE**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

-0.83 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.09

¹AAIJ 21O LHCB pp at 13 TeV

-0.79 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.10

¹AAIJ 18O LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

0.49 \pm 0.77 \pm 0.06

²AAIJ 15AL LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹Measured in $B_s^0 \to K^+ K^-$ decays.

²Measured in $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K_s^0$ decays.

C, CP violation parameter

$C = (1 - |\lambda|^2) / (1 + |\lambda|^2)$

**0.19 \pm 0.06 OUR AVERAGE**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.20 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.02

¹AAIJ 18O LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

-0.28 \pm 0.41 \pm 0.08

²AAIJ 15AL LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹Measured in $B_s^0 \to K^+ K^-$ decays.

²Measured in $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K_s^0$ decays.

S, CP violation parameter

$S = -2 \text{Im}(\lambda) / (1 + |\lambda|^2)$

**0.17 \pm 0.06 OUR AVERAGE**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.18 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.02

¹AAIJ 18O LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

-0.08 \pm 0.40 \pm 0.08

²AAIJ 15AL LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹Measured in $B_s^0 \to K^+ K^-$ decays.

²Measured in $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K_s^0$ decays.

$A_{CP}^{L}(B_s \to J/\psi \bar{K}^{*}(892)^{0})$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$-0.048 \pm 0.057 \pm 0.020$

AAIJ 15AV LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

$A_{CP}^{\parallel}(B_s \to J/\psi \bar{K}^{*}(892)^{0})$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$0.171 \pm 0.152 \pm 0.028$

AAIJ 15AV LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

$A_{CP}^{\perp}(B_s \to J/\psi \bar{K}^{*}(892)^{0})$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$-0.049 \pm 0.096 \pm 0.025$

AAIJ 15AV LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

$A_{CP}(B_s \to \pi^+ K^-)$

$A_{CP}$ is defined as

$$ \frac{B(B_s^0 \to f) - B(B_s^0 \to \bar{f})}{B(B_s^0 \to f) + B(B_s^0 \to \bar{f})} $$

the CP-violation asymmetry of exclusive $B_s^0$ and $\bar{B}_S^0$ decay.

**0.224 \pm 0.012 OUR AVERAGE**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.236 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.011

AAIJ 21O LHCB pp at 13 TeV

0.213 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.007

AAIJ 18O LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

0.22 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.02

AALTONEN 14P CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.27 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.01

AAIJ 13AX LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 18O

0.27 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.02

12V LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13AX

0.39 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.08

AALTONEN 11N CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 14P

$A_{CP}(B_s^0 \to [K^+ K^-]_D \bar{K}^*(892)^0)$

**-0.04 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.02**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$-0.04 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.02$

AAIJ 14BN LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.04 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.01

AAIJ 13L LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 14BN

$A_{CP}(B_s^0 \to [\pi^+ K^-]_D K^*(892)^0)$

**-0.01 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.02**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$-0.01 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.02$

AAIJ 14BN LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

$A_{CP}(B_s^0 \to [\pi^+ \pi^-]_D K^*(892)^0)$

**0.06 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.02**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$0.06 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.02$

AAIJ 14BN LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

$S(B_s^0 \to \phi\gamma)$

**0.43 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.11**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$0.43 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.11$

¹AAIJ 19AE LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹Measured in flavor tagged time dependent analysis.

$C(B_s^0 \to \phi\gamma)$

**0.11 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.11**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$0.11 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.11$

¹AAIJ 19AE LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹Measured in flavor tagged time dependent analysis.

$A^{\Delta}(B_s^0 \to \phi\gamma)$

$A^{\Delta}(B_s^0 \to \phi\gamma)$ is the multiplicative coefficient of the $\sinh(\Delta\Gamma t/2)$ term in the $B_s^0 \to \phi\gamma$ decay rate time dependence.

**-0.67 \pm 0.37 \pm 0.17**

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$-0.67 \pm 0.37 \pm 0.17$

¹AAIJ 19AE LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

-0.98 \pm 0.46 \pm 0.23

²AAIJ 17B LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 19AE

¹Measured in flavor tagged time dependent analysis, using tagged and un-tagged events. This result updates AAIJ 17B with better selection efficiency and other analysis improvements.

²Measured in time dependent analysis without initial flavor tagging.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>

### CPT VIOLATION PARAMETERS

In the $B_S^0$ mixing, propagating mass eigenstates can be written as

$$ 
\begin{aligned}
|B_{sL}\rangle &\propto p \sqrt{1-\xi} |B_S^0\rangle + q \sqrt{1+\xi} |\bar{B}_S^0\rangle \\
|B_{sH}\rangle &\propto p \sqrt{1+\xi} |B_S^0\rangle - q \sqrt{1-\xi} |\bar{B}_S^0\rangle
\end{aligned}
$$

where parameter $\xi$ controls CPT violation. If $\xi$ is zero, then CPT is conserved. The parameter $\xi$ can be written as

$$ \xi = \frac{2(M_{11}-M_{22})-i(f_{11}-f_{22})}{-2\Delta m_S+\Delta f_S} \approx \frac{-2\beta\mu\Delta a_\mu}{2\Delta m_S-\Delta f_S} $$

where $M_{ii}$, $\Gamma_{ii}$, $\Delta m_S$, and $\Delta\Gamma_S$ are parameters of Hamiltonian governing $B_S$ oscillations, $\beta\mu$ is the $B_S^0$ meson velocity and $\Delta a_\mu$ characterizes Lorentz-invariance violation.

### Δa<sub>L</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> GeV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.47&plusmn;0.39&plusmn;0.08</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16E</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td><strong>&lt; 1.2</strong></td><td>95</td><td>2 ABAZOV</td><td>15L</td><td>D0 p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

2 Measured in semileptonic $B_S^0 \to D_S^+ \mu^+ X$ decays. Also extracts limit on time and longitudinal components ($-0.8 < \Delta a_T - 0.396 \Delta a_Z < 3.9$) $10^{-13}$ GeV.

### Δa<sub>ll</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-14</sup> GeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.09&plusmn;1.41&plusmn;0.36</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16E</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

### Δa<sub>X</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-14</sup> GeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>+1.01&plusmn;2.08&plusmn;0.71</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16E</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

### Δa<sub>Y</sub>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-14</sup> GeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-3.83&plusmn;2.09&plusmn;0.71</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16E</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

### Re(ξ)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.022&plusmn;0.033&plusmn;0.003</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16E</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

### Im(ξ)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.004&plusmn;0.011&plusmn;0.002</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16E</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

### PARTIAL BRANCHING FRACTIONS IN $B_S \to \phi l^+ l^-$

#### $B(B_S \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (0.1 $<q^2 < 2.0$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

##### 1.14 $\pm$0.16 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.11 $\pm$0.14</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AQ LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.78 $\pm$0.95</td><td></td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.897$^{+0.207}_{-0.186}$</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13X LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

#### $B(B_S^0 \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (0.1 $<q^2 < 0.98$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6.81&plusmn;0.47&plusmn;0.34</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AG LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

#### $B(B_S^0 \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (1.1 $<q^2 < 2.5$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>4.41&plusmn;0.41&plusmn;0.24</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AG LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

#### $B(B_S \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (2.0 $<q^2 < 5.0$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.77 &plusmn;0.12 &plusmn;0.06</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AQ LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.529$^{+0.182}_{-0.159}$</td><td></td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>13X LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

0.58 $\pm$0.55 $\pm$0.19 2 AALTONEN 11AI CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

2 Measured in $2<q^2 < 4.3$ GeV$^2/c^4$.

#### $B(B_S^0 \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (2.5 $<q^2 < 4.0$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>3.51&plusmn;0.39&plusmn;0.18</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AG LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

#### $B(B_S^0 \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (4.0 $<q^2 < 6.0$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6.22&plusmn;0.48&plusmn;0.32</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AG LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

#### $B(B_S \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (5.0 $<q^2 < 8.0$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.96&plusmn;0.13&plusmn;0.08</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AQ LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.38$^{+0.25}_{-0.23}$</td><td></td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>13X LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.34&plusmn;0.83&plusmn;0.43</td><td></td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

2 Measured in $4.3<q^2 < 8.68$ GeV$^2/c^4$.

#### $B(B_S^0 \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (6.0 $<q^2 < 8.0$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6.30&plusmn;0.48&plusmn;0.32</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AG LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

#### $B(B_S \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (11.0 $<q^2 < 12.5$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.717&plusmn;0.045&plusmn;0.036</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AG LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.71 $\pm$0.10</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AQ LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 21AG</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.18 $\pm$0.22</td><td></td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>13X LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.98 $\pm$0.95</td><td></td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

2 Measured in $10.9<q^2 < 12.86$ GeV$^2/c^4$.

#### $B(B_S^0 \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (15.0 $<q^2 < 19.0$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>18.52&plusmn;0.80&plusmn;1.00</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AG LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

#### $B(B_S \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (15.0 $<q^2 < 17.0$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.050&plusmn;0.058&plusmn;0.054</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AG LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.90 $\pm$0.11</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AQ LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 21AG</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.760$^{+0.189}_{-0.169}$</td><td></td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>13X LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.86 $\pm$0.66</td><td></td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

2 Measured in $14.18<q^2 < 16$ GeV$^2/c^4$.

#### $B(B_S \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (17.0 $<q^2 < 19.0$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.838&plusmn;0.058&plusmn;0.046</strong></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AG LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.79 $\pm$0.11</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AQ LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 21AG</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.06 $^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$</td><td></td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>13X LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.32 $\pm$0.76</td><td></td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

2 Measured in $16<q^2 < 19$ GeV$^2/c^4$.

#### $B(B_S \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (1.0 $<q^2 < 6.0$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.44 $\pm$0.11 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.440 $\pm$0.075</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21AG LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.14 $\pm$0.79</td><td></td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.29 $\pm$0.16</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AQ LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 21AG</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.14 $^{+0.25}_{-0.23}$</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13X LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to \phi\mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

#### $B(B_S \to \phi l^+ l^-)$ (0.0 $<q^2 < 4.3$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>3.30&plusmn;1.09&plusmn;1.05</strong></td><td></td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

$B_S^0, B_S^*, B_{S1}(5830)^0$

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>12A</td>
      <td>PRL 109 171802</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>12C</td>
      <td>PRL 108 01901</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>12D</td>
      <td>PRL 085 072002</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>12L</td>
      <td>PRL 108 211803</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>12A</td>
      <td>PRL 085 092011</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>12C</td>
      <td>PRL 085 011103</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>12D</td>
      <td>PRL 085 032006</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CHATRCHYAN</td>
      <td>12A</td>
      <td>JHEP 1204 033</td>
      <td>S. Chatrchyan et al.</td>
      <td>(CMS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LEES</td>
      <td>12A</td>
      <td>PRL 085 011101</td>
      <td>J.P. Lees et al.</td>
      <td>(BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LI</td>
      <td>12</td>
      <td>PRL 108 181808</td>
      <td>J. Li et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>PDG</td>
      <td>12</td>
      <td>PRL 086 010001</td>
      <td>J. Beringer et al.</td>
      <td>(PDG Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>11A</td>
      <td>PL B698 115</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>11A</td>
      <td>PL B698 14</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>11B</td>
      <td>PL B699 330</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>11D</td>
      <td>PL B706 32</td>
      <td>R. Aaij</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>11E</td>
      <td>PR D84 092001</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Also</td>
      <td>11A</td>
      <td>PRL 085 039904 (errat.)</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>11A</td>
      <td>PRL 084 052012</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>11AB</td>
      <td>PRL 084 052012</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>11AG</td>
      <td>PRL 107 191801</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Also</td>
      <td>11A</td>
      <td>PRL 107 239903 (errat.)</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>11AI</td>
      <td>PRL 107 201802</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>11AN</td>
      <td>PRL 107 261802</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>11AP</td>
      <td>PRL 107 272001</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>11L</td>
      <td>PRL 106 161801</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>11N</td>
      <td>PRL 106 181802</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>11U</td>
      <td>PRL 084 052007</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CHATRCHYAN</td>
      <td>11T</td>
      <td>PRL 107 191802</td>
      <td>S. Chatrchyan et al.</td>
      <td>(CMS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LI</td>
      <td>11A</td>
      <td>PRL 106 121802</td>
      <td>J. Li et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>10E</td>
      <td>PRL D82 012003</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>10H</td>
      <td>PRL 105 081801</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Also</td>
      <td>10A</td>
      <td>PRL D82 032001</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>10S</td>
      <td>PL B693 539</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ESEN</td>
      <td>10E</td>
      <td>PRL 105 081802</td>
      <td>S. Esen et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LOUVOT</td>
      <td>10E</td>
      <td>PRL 104 231801</td>
      <td>R. LOUVOT et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>PENG</td>
      <td>10</td>
      <td>PRL D82 072007</td>
      <td>C.-C. Peng et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>09AQ</td>
      <td>PRL 103 191802</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>09B</td>
      <td>PRL D79 011104</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>09C</td>
      <td>PRL 084 031801</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>09P</td>
      <td>PRL 102 201801</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>09E</td>
      <td>PRL 102 032001</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>09G</td>
      <td>PRL 102 051801</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>09I</td>
      <td>PRL 102 091801</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>09Y</td>
      <td>PRL D79 111102</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LOUVOT</td>
      <td>09</td>
      <td>PRL 102 021801</td>
      <td>R. Louvot et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>08F</td>
      <td>PRL 100 021803</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>08G</td>
      <td>PRL 100 161802</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AALTONEN</td>
      <td>08J</td>
      <td>PRL 100 121803</td>
      <td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>08AM</td>
      <td>PRL 101 241801</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>WICHT</td>
      <td>08E</td>
      <td>PRL 100 121801</td>
      <td>J. Wicht et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>07</td>
      <td>PRL 98 121801</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>07A</td>
      <td>PRL 98 151801</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>07N</td>
      <td>PRL D76 057101</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>07Y</td>
      <td>PRL 99 241801</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABULENCIA</td>
      <td>07C</td>
      <td>PRL 98 061802</td>
      <td>A. Abulencia et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>DRUTSKOY</td>
      <td>07</td>
      <td>PRL 98 052001</td>
      <td>A. Drutskoy et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>DRUTSKOY</td>
      <td>07A</td>
      <td>PRL D76 012002</td>
      <td>A. Drutskoy et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>06B</td>
      <td>PRL 97 021802</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>06G</td>
      <td>PRL D74 031107</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>06V</td>
      <td>PRL 97 241801</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABULENCIA</td>
      <td>06J</td>
      <td>PRL D76 191801</td>
      <td>A. Abulencia et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABULENCIA</td>
      <td>06N</td>
      <td>PRL 96 231801</td>
      <td>A. Abulencia et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABULENCIA</td>
      <td>06Q</td>
      <td>PRL 97 062003</td>
      <td>A. Abulencia et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABULENCIA,A</td>
      <td>06D</td>
      <td>PRL 97 211802</td>
      <td>A. Abulencia et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABULENCIA,A</td>
      <td>06G</td>
      <td>PRL 97 242003</td>
      <td>A. Abulencia et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACOSTA</td>
      <td>06</td>
      <td>PRL 96 202001</td>
      <td>D. Acosta et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>05B</td>
      <td>PRL 94 042001</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>05W</td>
      <td>PRL 95 171801</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(D0 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACOSTA</td>
      <td>05E</td>
      <td>PRL 94 101803</td>
      <td>D. Acosta et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACOSTA</td>
      <td>05J</td>
      <td>PL 95 031801</td>
      <td>D. Acosta et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABDALLAH</td>
      <td>04A</td>
      <td>PL B585 63</td>
      <td>J. Abdallah et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABDALLAH</td>
      <td>04J</td>
      <td>PL C35 35</td>
      <td>J. Abdallah et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABDALLAH</td>
      <td>03B</td>
      <td>EPJ C28 155</td>
      <td>J. Abdallah et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>03D</td>
      <td>PL D67 012006</td>
      <td>K. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(SLD Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>HEISTER</td>
      <td>03E</td>
      <td>EPJ C29 143</td>
      <td>A. Heister et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>02V</td>
      <td>PRL D66 032009</td>
      <td>K. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(SLD Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACOSTA</td>
      <td>02D</td>
      <td>PRL D65 111101</td>
      <td>D. Acosta et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACOSTA</td>
      <td>02G</td>
      <td>PRL D66 112002</td>
      <td>D. Acosta et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABBIENDI</td>
      <td>01D</td>
      <td>EPJ C19 241</td>
      <td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>00C</td>
      <td>PRL D62 071101</td>
      <td>K. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(SLD Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABREU</td>
      <td>00Y</td>
      <td>EPJ C16 555</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABREU,P</td>
      <td>00E</td>
      <td>PRL C18 229</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AFFOLDER</td>
      <td>00N</td>
      <td>PRL 85 4668</td>
      <td>T. Affolder et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BARATE</td>
      <td>00K</td>
      <td>PL B486 286</td>
      <td>R. Barate et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABBIENDI</td>
      <td>99S</td>
      <td>EPJ C11 587</td>
      <td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>99D</td>
      <td>PRL D59 032004</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>99J</td>
      <td>PRL 82 3576</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BARATE</td>
      <td>99R</td>
      <td>PRL C12 181 (errat.)</td>
      <td>R. Barate et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Also</td>
      <td>99A</td>
      <td>PRL C12 181 (errat.)</td>
      <td>R. Barate et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>98B</td>
      <td>PRL D57 5382</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>98V</td>
      <td>PRL 81 5742</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACCIARRI</td>
      <td>98S</td>
      <td>PL B438 417</td>
      <td>M. Acciarri et al.</td>
      <td>(L3 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACKERSTAFF</td>
      <td>98F</td>
      <td>EPJ C2 407</td>
      <td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACKERSTAFF</td>
      <td>98G</td>
      <td>PL B426 161</td>
      <td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BARATE</td>
      <td>98C</td>
      <td>EPJ C4 367</td>
      <td>R. Barate et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BARATE</td>
      <td>98Q</td>
      <td>EPJ C4 387</td>
      <td>R. Barate et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>PDG</td>
      <td>98</td>
      <td>EPJ C3 1</td>
      <td>C. Caso et al.</td>
      <td>(PDG Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACCIARRI</td>
      <td>97B</td>
      <td>PL B374 474</td>
      <td>M. Acciarri et al.</td>
      <td>(L3 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACCIARRI</td>
      <td>97C</td>
      <td>PL B391 481</td>
      <td>M. Acciarri et al.</td>
      <td>(L3 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACKERSTAFF</td>
      <td>97U</td>
      <td>ZPHY C76 401</td>
      <td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACKERSTAFF</td>
      <td>97V</td>
      <td>ZPHY C76 417</td>
      <td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ADAM</td>
      <td>97</td>
      <td>PL B414 382</td>
      <td>W. Adam et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>96B</td>
      <td>PRL D53 3496</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>96F</td>
      <td>PRL D77 1945</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>96Q</td>
      <td>PRL D54 6596</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABREU</td>
      <td>96F</td>
      <td>ZPHY C71 11</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ADAM</td>
      <td>96D</td>
      <td>ZPHY C72 207</td>
      <td>W. Adam et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>96E</td>
      <td>ZPHY C69 585</td>
      <td>D. Buskullic et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>96M</td>
      <td>PL B377 205</td>
      <td>D. Buskullic et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>96V</td>
      <td>PL B384 471</td>
      <td>D. Buskullic et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>PDG</td>
      <td>96</td>
      <td>PRL D54 1</td>
      <td>R. M. Barnett et al.</td>
      <td>(PDG Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>95R</td>
      <td>PRL 74 4988</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>95Z</td>
      <td>PRL 75 3068</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACCIARRI</td>
      <td>95H</td>
      <td>PL B363 127</td>
      <td>M. Acciarri et al.</td>
      <td>(L3 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACCIARRI</td>
      <td>95I</td>
      <td>PL B363 137</td>
      <td>M. Acciarri et al.</td>
      <td>(L3 Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AKERS</td>
      <td>95V</td>
      <td>PL B350 273</td>
      <td>R. Akers et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AKERS</td>
      <td>95J</td>
      <td>ZPHY C66 555</td>
      <td>R. Akers et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>95J</td>
      <td>PL B356 409</td>
      <td>D. Buskullic et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>95O</td>
      <td>PL B361 221</td>
      <td>D. Buskullic et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABREU</td>
      <td>94E</td>
      <td>PL B324 500</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABREU</td>
      <td>94E</td>
      <td>ZPHY C61 407</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Also</td>
      <td>94E</td>
      <td>PL B289 199</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>AKERS</td>
      <td>94L</td>
      <td>PL B337 196</td>
      <td>R. Akers et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AKERS</td>
      <td>94L</td>
      <td>PL B337 393</td>
      <td>R. Akers et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>94B</td>
      <td>PL B322 441</td>
      <td>D. Buskullic et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>94C</td>
      <td>PL B322 275</td>
      <td>D. Buskullic et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABE</td>
      <td>93F</td>
      <td>PRL 71 1685</td>
      <td>F. Abe et al.</td>
      <td>(CDF Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACTON</td>
      <td>93H</td>
      <td>PL B312 501</td>
      <td>P.D. Acton et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>93G</td>
      <td>PL B311 425</td>
      <td>D. Buskullic et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABREU</td>
      <td>92M</td>
      <td>PL B289 199</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ACTON</td>
      <td>92N</td>
      <td>PL B295 357</td>
      <td>P.D. Acton et al.</td>
      <td>(OPAL Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BUSKULIC</td>
      <td>92E</td>
      <td>PL B294 145</td>
      <td>D. Buskullic et al.</td>
      <td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LEE-FRANZINI</td>
      <td>90L</td>
      <td>PRL 65 2947</td>
      <td>J. Lee-Franzini et al.</td>
      <td>(CUSB II Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

$B_s^*$

$I(J^P) = 0(1^{-})$

I, J, P need confirmation. Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions.

$B_s^* \text{ MASS}$

From mass difference below and the $B_S^0$ mass.

**VALUE (MeV)** **DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

**5415.4±1.4 OUR FIT** Error includes scale factor of 2.6.

**5415.8±1.5 OUR AVERAGE** Error includes scale factor of 2.6.

**5416.4±0.4±0.5** LOUVOT 09 BELL $e^+e^- \to T(5S)$

**5411.7±1.6±0.6** ¹ AQUINES 07A BELL Repl. by LOUVOT 09

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

**5418 ±1 ±3** DRUTSKOY 07A BELL Repl. by LOUVOT 09

**5414 ±1 ±3** ² BONVICINI 06 CLEO $e^+e^- \to T(5S)$

¹ Utilized the beam constrained invariant mass peak positions for $B^*$ and $B_S^*$ to extract the measurement.

² Uses 14 candidates consistent with $B_S$ decays into final states with a $J/\psi$ and a $D_S^{(*)-}$.

$m_{B_S^*} - m_{B_S}$

**VALUE (MeV)** **DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

**48.5±1.4 OUR FIT** Error includes scale factor of 2.6.

**46.1±1.5 OUR AVERAGE**

**45.7±1.7±0.7** ³ AQUINES 06 CLEO $e^+e^- \to T(5S)$

**47.0±2.6** ⁴ LEE-FRANZINI 190 CSB2 $e^+e^- \to T(5S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

**48 ±1 ±3** ⁵ BONVICINI 06 CLEO Repl. by AQUINES 06

³ Utilized the beam constrained invariant mass peak positions for $B^*$ and $B_S^*$ to extract the measurement.

⁴ LEE-FRANZINI 90 measure 46.7 ± 0.4 ± 0.2 MeV for an admixture of $B^0$, $B^+$, and $B_S^0$. They use the shape of the photon line to separate the above value for $B_S$.

⁵ Uses 14 candidates consistent with $B_S$ decays into final states with a $J/\psi$ and a $D_S^{(*)-}$.

$$|(m_{B_S^*} - m_{B_S}) - (m_{B_S^*} - m_{B_S})|$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (MeV)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;6</td>
      <td>95</td>
      <td>ABREU</td>
      <td>95R</td>
      <td>DLPH E<sub>cm</sub><sup>ee</sup> = 88-94 GeV</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

$B_S^*$ DECAY MODES

Mode

Fraction ($\Gamma_f/\Gamma$)

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>Γ<sub>1</sub></td>
    <td>B<sub>S</sub> γ</td>
    <td>seen</td>
  </tr>
</table>

$B_S^*$ REFERENCES

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>LOUVOT</td>
      <td>09</td>
      <td>PRL 102 01801</td>
      <td>R. Louvot et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>DRUTSKOY</td>
      <td>07A</td>
      <td>PRL D76 012002</td>
      <td>A. Drutskoy et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AQUINES</td>
      <td>06</td>
      <td>PRL 96 152001</td>
      <td>O. Aquines et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BONVICINI</td>
      <td>06</td>
      <td>PRL 96 022002</td>
      <td>G. Bonvicini et al.</td>
      <td>(CLEO Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABREU</td>
      <td>95R</td>
      <td>ZPHY C68 353</td>
      <td>P. Abreu et al.</td>
      <td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LEE-FRANZINI</td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>PRL 65 2947</td>
      <td>J. Lee-Franzini et al.</td>
      <td>(CUSB II Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

$B_{S1}(5830)^0$

$I(J^P) = 0(1^+)$

Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions.

$B_{S1}(5830)^0 \text{ MASS}$

**VALUE (MeV)** **DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>5828.73±0.20 OUR FIT</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>5828.65±0.24 OUR AVERAGE</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>5828.78±0.04±0.29</td>
      <td>SIRUNYAN</td>
      <td>18DF CMS</td>
      <td>pp at 8 TeV</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>5828.40±0.04±0.41</td>
      <td>¹ AAIJ</td>
      <td>130 LHCB</td>
      <td>pp at 7 TeV</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>5829.4±0.7</td>
      <td>² AALTONEN</td>
      <td>08k CDF</td>
      <td>Repl. by AALTONEN 14I</td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>¹ Uses $B_{S1}(5830)^0 \to B^+K^-$ decay.</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>² Uses two-body decays into $K^-$ and $B^+$ mesons reconstructed as $B^+ \to J/\psi K^+$, $J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-$ or $B^+ \to \bar{D}^0\pi^+$, $\bar{D}^0 \to K^+\pi^-$. The $B^+$ mass is $1000$ MeV.</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
$$m_{B_{s1}^0} - m_{B^{++}}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

**503.98±0.17 OUR FIT**

**504.03±0.12±0.15**

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

**504.41±0.21±0.14**

¹ AALTONEN 14I CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

² AALTONEN 08K CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 14I

¹ AALTONEN 14I reports $m_{B_{s1}(5830)^0} - m_{B^{++}} - m_{K^-} = 10.35 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.15$ MeV which we adjusted by the $K^-$ mass.

² Uses two-body decays into $K^-$ and $B^+$ mesons reconstructed as $B^+ \to J/\psi K^+$, $J/\psi \to \mu^+ \mu^- \text{ or } B^+ \to D^0 \pi^+$, $D^0 \to K^+ \pi^-\text{.}$

**$B_{s1}(5830)^0$ WIDTH**

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.5±0.3±0.3</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14I</td><td>CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

**$B_{s1}(5830)^0$ DECAY MODES**

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_j/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1$</td><td>$B^{*+} K^-$</td></tr><tr><td>$\Gamma_2$</td><td>$B^{*0} K_S^0$</td></tr></tbody></table>

**$B_{s1}(5830)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS**

<table><thead><tr><th>$\Gamma(B^{*+} K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$</th><th>$\Gamma_1/\Gamma$</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>08K</td><td>CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>$\Gamma(B^{*0} K_S^0)/\Gamma(B^{*+} K^-)$</th><th>$\Gamma_2/\Gamma_1$</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.49±0.12±0.07</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ With the branching fractions $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.026 \pm 0.031) \times 10^{-3}$ and $B(B^0 \to J/\psi K^{*0}) = (1.28 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$.

**$B_{s1}(5830)^0$ REFERENCES**

<table><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>18DF EPJ C78 939</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14I PR D90 012013</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13O PRL 110 151803</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>08K PRL 100 082001</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$B_{s2}^*(5840)^0$$

$$I(J^P) = 0(2^+)$$

I, J, P need confirmation.

Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions.

**$B_{s2}^*(5840)^0$ MASS**

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>5839.88±0.12 OUR FIT</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>5839.92±0.14 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>5839.86±0.09±0.17</td><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>18DF CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5839.99±0.05±0.20</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13O LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5839.6 ±1.1±0.7</td><td>1 ABAZOV</td><td>08E D0</td><td>$p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

5839.7 ±0.7 ² AALTONEN 08K CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 14I

¹ Observed in $B_{s2}^{*0} \to B^{+} K^{-}$. Measured production rate of $B_{s2}^{*0}$ relative to $B^{+}$ to be (1.15 ± 0.23 ± 0.13)%.

² Uses two-body decays into $K^-$ and $B^+$ mesons reconstructed as $B^+ \to J/\psi K^+$, $J/\psi \to \mu^+ \mu^- \text{ or } B^+ \to D^0 \pi^+$, $D^0 \to K^+ \pi^-\text{.}$

$$m_{B_{s2}^0} - m_{B_{s1}^0}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

10.5±0.6 ¹ AALTONEN 08K CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 14I

¹ Uses two-body decays into $K^-$ and $B^+$ mesons reconstructed as $B^+ \to J/\psi K^+$, $J/\psi \to \mu^+ \mu^- \text{ or } B^+ \to D^0 \pi^+$, $D^0 \to K^+ \pi^-\text{.}$

$$m_{B_{s2}^0} - m_{B^{++}}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>560.48±0.12 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>560.41±0.13±0.14</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AALTONEN 14I CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

¹ AALTONEN 14I reports $m_{B_{s2}(5840)^0} - m_{B^{++}} - m_{K^-} = 66.73 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.14$ MeV which we adjusted by the $K^-$ mass.

**$B_{s2}^*(5840)^0$ WIDTH**

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

**1.49±0.27 OUR AVERAGE**

1.52±0.34±0.30
1.4 ± 0.4 ± 0.2
1.56±0.13±0.47
SIRUNYAN 18DF CMS pp at 8 TeV
AALTONEN 14I CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV
1 AAIJ 13O LHCB pp at 7 TeV

¹ Uses $B_{s2}^*(5840)^0 \to B^{*+} K^-$ decays.

**$B_{s2}^*(5840)^0$ DECAY MODES**

Branching fractions are given relative to the one **DEFINED AS 1**.

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction ($\Gamma_j/\Gamma$)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>$\Gamma_1$</td><td>$B^{+} K^{-}$</td></tr><tr><td>$\Gamma_2$</td><td>$B^{*+} K^{-}$</td></tr><tr><td>$\Gamma_3$</td><td>$B^{0} K_S^0$</td></tr><tr><td>$\Gamma_4$</td><td>$B^{*0} K_S^0$</td></tr></tbody></table>

**$B_{s2}^*(5840)^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS**

<table><thead><tr><th>$\Gamma(B^{*+} K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$</th><th>$\Gamma_1/\Gamma$</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured production rate of $B_{s2}^{*0}$ relative to $B^{+}$ to be (1.15 ± 0.23 ± 0.13)%.

<table><thead><tr><th>$\Gamma(B^{*+} K^-)/\Gamma(B^{+} K^-)$</th><th>$\Gamma_2/\Gamma_1$</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.093±0.013±0.012</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>$\Gamma(B^{*0} K_S^0)/\Gamma(B^{0} K_S^0)$</th><th>$\Gamma_4/\Gamma_3$</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.093±0.086±0.014</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ With the branching fraction $B(B^0 \to J/\psi K^{*0}) = (1.28 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$.

<table><thead><tr><th>$\Gamma(B^{*+} K^-)/\Gamma(B^{+} K^-)$</th><th>$\Gamma_3/\Gamma_1$</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.432±0.077±0.078</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ With the branching fractions $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.026 \pm 0.031) \times 10^{-3}$ and $B(B^0 \to J/\psi K^{*0}) = (1.28 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$.

<table><thead><tr><th>$\Gamma(B^{*+} K^-)/\Gamma(B^{+} K^-)$</th><th>$\Gamma_2/\Gamma_1$</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VALUE</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.081±0.021±0.015</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ With the branching fraction $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.026 \pm 0.031) \times 10^{-3}$.

**$B_{s2}^*(5840)^0$ REFERENCES**

<table><tr><td>SIRUNYAN</td><td>18DF EPJ C78 939</td><td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14I PR D90 012013</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13O PRL 110 151803</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>08K PRL 100 082001</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>08E PRL 100 082002</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr></table>

$$B_{s,J}^*(5850)$$

$$I(J^P) = ?(???^?)$$

OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE

Signal can be interpreted as coming from $\bar{b}s$ states. Needs confirmation.

**$B_{s,J}^*(5850)$ MASS**

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5853±15</td><td>141</td><td>AKERS</td><td>95E</td><td>OPAL $E_{cm}^{ee} = 88-94$ GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

**$B_{s,J}^*(5850)$ WIDTH**

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>47±22</td><td>141</td><td>AKERS</td><td>95E</td><td>OPAL $E_{cm}^{ee} = 88-94$ GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

**$B_{s,J}^*(5850)$ REFERENCES**

<table><tr><td>AKERS</td><td>95E</td><td>ZPHY C66 19</td><td>R. Akers et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr></table>
$B_{s,J}(6063)^0$

$I(J^P) = 0(??)$

OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE

$B_{s,J}(6063)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6063.5±1.2±0.8</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21D</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Seen in the decay channel $B^±K^∓$. Integrated luminosity = 9 fb⁻¹.

$B_{s,J}(6063)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>26±4±4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21D</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Seen in the decay channel $B^±K^∓$. Integrated luminosity = 9 fb⁻¹.

$B_{s,J}(6063)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> B<sup>+</sup> K<sup>−</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(B^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21D</td><td>LHCB B<sup>±</sup> K<sup>∓</sup> mass spectrum</td></tr></tbody></table>

$B_{s,J}(6063)^0$ REFERENCES

AAIJ 21D EPJ C81 601 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)

$B_{s,J}(6114)^0$

$I(J^P) = 0(??)$

OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE

$B_{s,J}(6114)^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6114±3±5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21D</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Seen in the decay channel $B^±K^∓$. Integrated luminosity = 9 fb⁻¹.

$B_{s,J}(6114)^0$ WIDTH

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>66±18±21</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21D</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Seen in the decay channel $B^±K^∓$. Integrated luminosity = 9 fb⁻¹.

$B_{s,J}(6114)^0$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> B<sup>+</sup> K<sup>−</sup></td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(B^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21D</td><td>LHCB B<sup>±</sup> K<sup>∓</sup> mass spectrum</td></tr></tbody></table>

$B_{s,J}(6114)^0$ REFERENCES

AAIJ 21D EPJ C81 601 R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)