# Detectability of the daily evapotranspiration cycle in superconducting gravimeter timeseries according to the measurement configuration

Quentin Chaffaut, Bertille Loiseau, Malo Ginoux, Nolwenn Lesparre, Albert Olioso, Chloé Ollivier, Benjamin Belfort, Marie-Claire Pierret, Sébastien Merlet, Solenn Cotel, et al.

► To cite this version:

Quentin Chaffaut, Bertille Loiseau, Malo Ginoux, Nolwenn Lesparre, Albert Olioso, et al. Detectability of the daily evapotranspiration cycle in superconducting gravimeter timeseries according to the measurement configuration. EGU General Assembly 2025, Apr 2025, Vienne (AUT), Austria. 2025, 10.5194/egusphere-egu25-16741. http://hal-05208033

HAL Id: hal-05208033

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05208033v1

Submitted on 18 Aug 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Detectability of the daily evapotranspiration cycle in superconducting gravimeter timeseries according to the measurement configuration

quentin Chaffaut<fnref n="1" />, bertille Loiseau<fnref n="1" />, malo Ginoux<fnref n="1" />, Nolwenn Lesparre<fnref n="2" />, Albert Olioso<fnref n="3" />, Chloé Ollivier<fnref n="4" />, Benjamin Belfort<fnref n="2" />, Marie-Claire Pierret<fnref n="2" />, Sébastien Merlet<fnref n="5" />, Solenn Cotel<fnref n="2" />, Cédric Champollion<fnref n="6" />, Nicolas Le Moigne<fnref n="6" />, Konstantinos Chalikakis<fnref n="3" />, Naomi Mazzilli<fnref n="3" />, Jérôme Demarty<fnref n="7" />, Damien Jougnot<fnref n="1" />, and Simon D. Carrière<fnref n="7" />

Evapotranspiration (ET) is a key process of the water cycle in general and in ecohydrology in particular. Measuring ET in forest eco-hydrosystems allows us to gain a better understanding of the response of forests to drought events, and to better anticipate the effects of climate change. Punctual (e.g. lysimeters or sapflow measurements) or integrative measurement methods (e.g. eddy covariance tower) can be used to estimate ET at the forest stand scale but these methods are not without limitations (e.g., resolution issues, representativeness, not adapted to mountainous areas).

Superconducting gravimeters can be used to study ET. These gravimeters can be deployed in both flat and mountainous environments. In this work, we studied the hydrological residuals (i.e., hydrologically induced gravity variations) of 5 superconducting gravimeters located in different contexts. We interpreted the daily decreases in the stacked hydrological residual as the loss of water mass due to evapotranspiration. These results were compared with those of the *SimpKcET* water balance model.

The results underline that the detectability of the ET signal depends strongly on the configuration of the gravimetric station, the topography and the type of ecosystem. We show that gravimeters located on summit area and in a forested context can detect the seasonality of ET. Conversely, gravimeters located in flat or underground areas and with a significant masking effect are unable to detect ET.

Gravimetry therefore has a strong complementarity with conventional methods used to study ET and could contribute to a better understanding of water fluxes in forested ecosystems.

<footnote n="1">¹Sorbonne Université, UMR 7619 METIS (UPMC/CNRS/EPHE), Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, UMR 7063, 67000 Strasbourg, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Université d'Avignon, INRAE, UMR 1114 EMMAH (AU/INRAE), Avignon, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴IRD, UMR 5126 CESBIO (UPS/CNES/CNRS/INRAE/IRD), Toulouse, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵LNE-OP / Laboratoire Temps Espace (LTE), Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶Université de Montpellier, CNRS, UMR 5243 GM (CNRS/UM/UA), Montpellier, France</footnote>

<footnote n="7">⁷Université de Montpellier, UMR 5151 HSM (CNRS/UM/IRD), Montpellier, France</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>