# Meson Particle Listings

## B$^{±}$/B⁰ ADMIXTURE

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{\pm} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{90/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.585±0.025±0.070</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93i</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALBRECHT 93 excludes $π^{±}$ from $K_S^0$ and $Λ$ decays. If included, they find 4.105 ± 0.025 ± 0.080.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{91/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.35±0.02±0.11</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>01j</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹From fully inclusive $π^0$ yield with no corrections from decays of $K_S^0$ or other particles.

$$ \Gamma(\eta \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{92/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.176±0.011±0.012</td><td>KUBOTA</td><td>96</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\rho^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{93/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.208±0.042±0.032</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94j</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\omega \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{94/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.81</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94j</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{95/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0343±0.0012 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0353±0.0005±0.0030</td><td>HUANG</td><td>07</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.0341±0.0006±0.0012</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04s</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.0390±0.0030±0.0035</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94j</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.023±0.006±0.005</td><td>BORTOLETTO86</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\phi K^*(892))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{96/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.2×10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+ \text{ gluon (charmless)})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{98/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.72<sup>+0.50</sup><sub>-0.47</sub>±0.59</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..11</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹$B \to \pi^+X$ with $m_X < 1.71 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ / \bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{99/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.61±0.32±0.16</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07c</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.4 ± 0.8 ± 0.8</td><td>2 CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>14 ± 9</td><td>3 ALBRECHT</td><td>88E</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;11.2</td><td>4 ALAM</td><td>87</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT 07c reports 0.045 ± 0.003 ± 0.012 from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B \to \Lambda_c^+ / \bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²CRAWFORD 92 result derived from lepton baryon correlations. Assumes all charmed baryons in $B^0$ and $B^{\pm}$ decay are $\Lambda_c$.

³ALBRECHT 88E measured $B(B \to \Lambda_c^+X)B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (0.30 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.06)\%$ and used $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (2.2 \pm 1.0)\%$ from ABRAMS 80 to obtain above number.

⁴Assuming all baryons result from charmed baryons, ALAM 86 conclude the branching fraction is 7.4 ± 2.9%. The limit given above is model independent.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{100/\Gamma_{101}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.19±0.13±0.04</td><td>1 AMMAR</td><td>97</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AMMAR 97 uses a high-momentum lepton tag ($P_\ell > 1.4 \text{ GeV/c}^2$).

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- \mu^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{104/\Gamma_{101}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-2.0±2.0±1.9</td><td>LEES</td><td>12</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- \ell^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ / \bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{102/\Gamma_{99}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.5×10<sup>-2</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹LEES 12 quotes also the measurement $\Gamma(B \to \Lambda_c^+ / \bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything})/\Gamma(B \to \Lambda_c^+ / \bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything}) = (1.2 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- e^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ / \bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{103/\Gamma_{99}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.05</td><td>90</td><td>1 BONVICINI</td><td>98</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BONVICINI 98 uses the electron with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- e^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{103/\Gamma_{101}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.5±1.1±0.6</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses the full reconstruction of the recolling B in a hadronic decay as a tag.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- \ell^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{102/\Gamma_{101}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.5×10<sup>-2</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹LEES 12 quotes also the measurement $\Gamma(B \to \bar{\Lambda}_c^- \ell^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma(B \to \bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything}) = (1.7 \pm 1.0 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- \rho \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ / \bar{\Lambda}_c^- \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{105/\Gamma_{99}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.57±0.05±0.05</td><td>BONVICINI</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- \rho e^+ \nu_e)/\Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_c^- \rho \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{106/\Gamma_{105}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.04</td><td>90</td><td>1 BONVICINI</td><td>98</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BONVICINI 98 uses the electron with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Sigma}_c^- \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{107/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0034±0.0017<sup>+0.0002</sup><sub>-0.0001</sub></td><td>1 PROCARIO</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹PROCARIO 94 reports $[\Gamma(B \to \bar{\Sigma}_c^- \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)] = 0.00021 \pm 0.00008 \pm 0.00007$ which we divide by our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Sigma}_c^- \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{108/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8×10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 PROCARIO</td><td>94</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹PROCARIO 94 reports $[\Gamma(B \to \bar{\Sigma}_c^- \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)] < 0.00048$ which we divide by our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 6.24 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Sigma}_c^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{109/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0037±0.0017±0.0002</td><td>1 PROCARIO</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹PROCARIO 94 reports $[\Gamma(B \to \bar{\Sigma}_c^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)] = 0.00023 \pm 0.00008 \pm 0.00007$ which we divide by our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Sigma}_c^0 N(N=p \text{ or } n))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{110/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.2×10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 PROCARIO</td><td>94</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹PROCARIO 94 reports $< 0.0017$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B \to \bar{\Sigma}_c^0 N(N=p \text{ or } n))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 0.043$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 6.24 \times 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Sigma}_c^0 \text{ anything}, \bar{\Sigma}_c^0 \to \Xi^- \pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{111/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.193±0.030 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.211±0.019±0.025</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>05M</td><td>BABR</td></tr><tr><td>0.144±0.048±0.021</td><td>2 BARISH</td><td>97</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The yield is obtained by requiring the momentum $P < 2.15 \text{ GeV/c}$.

²BARISH 97 find 79 ± 27 $\Xi_c^0$ events.

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_c^+, \Xi_c^+ \to \Xi^- \pi^+ \pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{112/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.453±0.096<sup>+0.085</sup><sub>-0.065</sub></td><td>1 BARISH</td><td>97</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BARISH 97 find 125 ± 28 $\Xi_c^0$ events.

$$ \Gamma(\rho/\bar{\rho} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{113/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.080±0.004 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.080±0.005±0.005</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>93i</td><td>ARG</td></tr><tr><td>0.080±0.005±0.003</td><td>CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO</td></tr><tr><td>0.082±0.005<sup>+0.013</sup><sub>-0.010</sub></td><td>2163</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>89k</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.080±0.005</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>93i</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.080±0.005</td><td>CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.082±0.005</td><td>2163</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>89k</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&gt;0.021</td><td>2 ALAM</td><td>83b</td><td>CLEO</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALBRECHT 89k include direct and nondirect protons.

²ALAM 83b reported their result as $> 0.036 \pm 0.006 \pm 0.009$. Data are consistent with equal yields of $p$ and $\bar{p}$. Using assumed yields below cut, $B(B \to p+X) = 0.03$ not including protons from $\Lambda$ decays.
$$ \Gamma(\bar{p}/\bar{\rho} \text{ (direct anything)})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{114}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.055 ± 0.005 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.055 ± 0.005 ± 0.0035</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>931</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.056 ± 0.006 ± 0.005</td><td>CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.055 ± 0.016</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>89k</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1220</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALBRECHT 89k subtract contribution of Λ decay from the inclusive proton yield.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{p}e^{+} \nu_e \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{115}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 5.9 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ADAM</td><td>03B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;16 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>90H</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Based on V-A model.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{116}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.040 ± 0.005 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.038 ± 0.004 ± 0.006</td><td>2998</td><td>CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.042 ± 0.005 ± 0.006</td><td>943</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89k</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.022 ± 0.003 ± 0.0022</td><td></td><td>1 ACKERSTAFF 97N</td><td>OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&gt;0.011</td><td></td><td>2 ALAM</td><td>83B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.022 ± 0.003 ± 0.0022 ¹ACKERSTAFF 97N

>0.011 2 ALAM 83B CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

¹ACKERSTAFF 97N assumes B(b → B) = 0.868 ± 0.041, i.e., an admixture of B⁰, B±, and B₅.

²ALAM 83b reported their result as > 0.022 ± 0.007 ± 0.004. Values are for (B(ΛX)+B(Λ̄X))/2. Data are consistent with equal yields of p and p̄. Using assumed yields below cut, B(B → ΛX) = 0.03.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{\Lambda} \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{117}/\Gamma_{118} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.43 ± 0.09 ± 0.07</td><td>1 AMMAR</td><td>97</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AMMAR 97 uses a high-momentum lepton tag (P<sub>ℓ</sub> > 1.4 GeV/c²).

$$ \Gamma(\Xi^- / \Xi^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{119}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.0027 ± 0.0006 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.0027 ± 0.0005 ± 0.0004</td><td>147</td><td>CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.0028 ± 0.0014</td><td>54</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89k</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\text{baryons anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{120}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.068 ± 0.005 ± 0.003</td><td></td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>920</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.076 ± 0.014 2 ALBRECHT 89k ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

¹ALBRECHT 920 result is from simultaneous analysis of p and Λ yields, pP̄ and Λp̄ correlations, and various lepton-baryon and lepton-baryon-antibaryon correlations. Supersedes ALBRECHT 89k.

²ALBRECHT 89k obtain this result by adding their measurements (5.5 ± 1.6)% for direct protons and (4.2 ± 0.5 ± 0.6)% for inclusive Λ production. They then assume (5.5 ± 1.6)% for neutron production and add it in also. Since each B decay has two baryons, they divide by 2 to obtain (7.6 ± 1.4)%.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{121}/\Gamma $$

Includes p and p̄ from Λ and Λ̄ decay.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.0247 ± 0.0023 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.024 ± 0.001 ± 0.004</td><td>CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.025 ± 0.002 ± 0.002</td><td>918</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89k</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p} \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\rho/\bar{\rho} \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{121}/\Gamma_{113} $$

Includes p and p̄ from Λ and Λ̄ decay.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.30 ± 0.02 ± 0.05</strong></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹CRAWFORD 92 value is not independent of their Γ(pρ anything)/Γ<sub>total</sub> value.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\rho}/\bar{\Lambda}\rho \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{122}/\Gamma $$

Includes p and p̄ from Λ and Λ̄ decay.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.025 ± 0.004 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.029 ± 0.005 ± 0.005</td><td>CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.023 ± 0.004 ± 0.003</td><td>165</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89k</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\rho}/\bar{\Lambda}\rho \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda} \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{122}/\Gamma_{116} $$

Includes p and p̄ from Λ and Λ̄ decay.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.76 ± 0.11 ± 0.08</strong></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹CRAWFORD 92 value is not independent of their [Γ(Λρ anything)+Γ(Λ̄ρ anything)]/Γ<sub>total</sub> value.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{123}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.005</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.0088</td><td>90</td><td>12</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89k</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda\bar{\Lambda} \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda} \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{123}/\Gamma_{116} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.13</td><td>90</td><td>1 CRAWFORD</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹CRAWFORD 92 value is not independent of their Γ(ΛΛ anything)/Γ<sub>total</sub> value.

$$ \Gamma(s e^{+} e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{124}/\Gamma $$

Test for ΔB = 1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>6.7 ± 1.7 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>7.69<sup>+0.82</sup><sub>-0.71</sub></td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>4.04<sup>+1.30</sup><sub>-0.87</sub></td><td></td><td>2 IWASAKI</td><td>05</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>6.0 ± 1.7 ± 1.3</td><td></td><td>2 AUBERT, B</td><td>04I</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 14D</td></tr><tr><td>5.0 ± 2.3<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.1</sub></td><td></td><td>2 KANEKO</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by IWASAKI 05</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

6.0 ± 1.7 ± 1.3 ²AUBERT, B Repl. by LEES 14D

5.0 ± 2.3<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.1</sub> ²KANEKO Repl. by IWASAKI 05

< 57 90 GLENN 98 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

<50000 90 BEBEK 81 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

¹Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>0</sup>, K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, and K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> corrected for unobserved modes.

²Requires M<sub>ℓ+ℓ-</sub> > 0.2 GeV/c².

$$ \Gamma(s \mu^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{125}/\Gamma $$

Test for ΔB = 1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>4.3 ± 1.0 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>4.41<sup>+1.31</sup><sub>-0.63</sub></td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>4.13 ± 1.05<sup>+0.85</sup><sub>-0.81</sub></td><td></td><td>2 IWASAKI</td><td>05</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

5.0 ± 2.8 ± 1.2 AUBERT, B Repl. by LEES 14D

7.9 ± 2.1<sup>+2.1</sup><sub>-1.5</sub> ²KANEKO Repl. by IWASAKI 05

< 58 90 GLENN 98 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

<17000 90 CHADWICK 81 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)

¹Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>0</sup>, K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, and K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> corrected for unobserved modes.

²Requires M<sub>ℓ+ℓ-</sub> > 0.2 GeV/c².

$$ \frac{[\Gamma(s e^{+} e^{-}) + \Gamma(s \mu^{+} \mu^{-})]}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \frac{(\Gamma_{124} + \Gamma_{125})}{\Gamma} $$

Test for ΔB = 1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>GLENN</td><td>98</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<0.0024 90 1 BEAN 87 CLEO Repl. by GLENN 98

<0.0062 90 2 AVERY 84 CLEO Repl. by BEAN 87

¹BEAN 87 reports [(μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup>)+(e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>)]/2 and we converted it.

²Determine ratio of B<sup>+</sup> to B<sup>0</sup> semileptonic decays to be in the range 0.25-2.9.

$$ \Gamma(s \ell^{+} \ell^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{126}/\Gamma $$

Test for ΔB = 1 weak neutral current.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>5.8 ± 1.3 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>6.73<sup>+0.70</sup><sub>-0.64</sub></td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

4.11 ± 0.83<sup>+0.85</sup><sub>-0.81</sub> ²IWASAKI Repl. by BEAN 87

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

5.6 ± 1.5 ± 1.3 AUBERT, B Repl. by LEES 14D

6.1 ± 1.4<sup>+1.4</sup><sub>-1.1</sub> ³KANEKO Repl. by IWASAKI 05

¹Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>0</sup>, K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, and K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> corrected for unobserved modes.

²Requires M<sub>ℓ+ℓ-</sub> > 0.2 GeV/c².

³Requires M<sub>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup></sub> > 0.2 GeV/c².

$$ \Gamma(\pi \ell^{+} \ell^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{127}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.9 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>13M</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.2 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 WEI</td><td>08A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;9.1 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AG</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B<sup>+</sup> and B<sup>0</sup> at the T(45).
# Meson Particle Listings

## $B^{\pm}/B^0$ ADMIXTURE

$\Gamma(\pi e^{+} e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{128}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;11.0 &times; 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 LEES</td><td>13M</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(\pi\mu^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{129}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.0 &times; 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 LEES</td><td>13M</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(K e^{+} e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{130}/\Gamma$

Test for $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.4 &pm; 0.6 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.9<sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-0.8</sub></td><td>0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.8<sup>+0.8</sup><sub>-0.7</sub></td><td>0.3</td><td>1 WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.3<sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-0.8</sub></td><td>0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.4<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-1.6</sub></td><td>0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03U</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06J</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.8<sup>+1.5</sup><sub>-1.3</sub></td><td>0.3</td><td>1,2 ISHIKAWA</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by WEI 09A</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;13</td><td>90</td><td>ABE</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by ISHIKAWA 03</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.

$\Gamma(K^{*}(892) e^{+} e^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{131}/\Gamma$

Test for $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.9 &pm; 2.0 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.9 &pm; 2.0 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.9<sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-2.1</sub></td><td>0.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>13.9<sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-2.0</sub></td><td>1.2</td><td>1 WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.7<sup>+3.0</sup><sub>-2.7</sub></td><td>1.4</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.8<sup>+5.0</sup><sub>-4.2</sub></td><td>1.1</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03U</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06J</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>14.9<sup>+5.2</sup><sub>-4.6</sub></td><td>1.2</td><td>2 ISHIKAWA</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by WEI 09A</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;56</td><td>90</td><td>ABE</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by ISHIKAWA 03</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Assumes equal production of $B^{0}$ and $B^{+}$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$. The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.

$\Gamma(K \mu^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{132}/\Gamma$

Test for $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.4 &pm; 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.2 &pm; 0.4</td><td>0.2</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.1<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.2</sub></td><td>0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.0 &pm; 0.6</td><td>0.3</td><td>1 WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.5<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.1</sub></td><td>0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.5<sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-1.9</sub></td><td>0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03U</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06J</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.8<sup>+1.2</sup><sub>-1.1</sub></td><td>0.4</td><td>1,2 ISHIKAWA</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by WEI 09A</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.9<sup>+4.0</sup><sub>-3.2</sub></td><td>1.3</td><td>ABE</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by ISHIKAWA 03</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.

$\Gamma(K \mu^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma(K e^{+} e^{-})$

$\Gamma_{133}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.01<sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.16</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.03<sup>+0.28</sup><sub>-0.24</sub></td><td>0.01</td><td>1 CHOUDHURY 21</td><td>BELL $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.00<sup>+0.31</sup><sub>-0.25</sub></td><td>0.07</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.96<sup>+0.44</sup><sub>-0.34</sub></td><td>0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.03 &pm; 0.19</td><td>0.06</td><td>3 WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.06 &pm; 0.48</td><td>0.08</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹For $1.0 &lt; q^2 &lt; 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.

²Measured in the union of $0.10 &lt; q^2 &lt; 8.12 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$ and $q^2 &gt; 10.11 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$. LEES 12S reports also individual measurements $\Gamma(B \rightarrow K\mu^{+}\mu^{-})/\Gamma(B \rightarrow K e^{+} e^{-}) = 0.74^{+0.40}_{-0.31} \pm 0.06$ for $0.10 &lt; q^2 &lt; 8.12 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$ and $\Gamma(B \rightarrow K\mu^{+}\mu^{-})/\Gamma(B \rightarrow K e^{+} e^{-}) = 1.43^{+0.65}_{-0.44} \pm 0.12$ for $q^2 &gt; 10.11 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$.

³Supersedes by CHOUDHURY 21.

$\Gamma(K^{*}(892) \mu^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{133}/\Gamma$

Test for $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.6 &pm; 0.9 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.1 &pm; 1.0</td><td>0.5</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>13.5<sup>+3.5</sup><sub>-3.3</sub></td><td>1.0</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.0<sup>+1.6</sup><sub>-1.4</sub></td><td>0.8</td><td>1 WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.8<sup>+3.5</sup><sub>-3.0</sub></td><td>1.2</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>12.7<sup>+7.6</sup><sub>-6.1</sub></td><td>1.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03U</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06J</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.7<sup>+3.6</sup><sub>-3.1</sub></td><td>1.0</td><td>2 ISHIKAWA</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by WEI 09A</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;31</td><td>90</td><td>ABE</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by ISHIKAWA 03</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Assumes equal production of $B^{0}$ and $B^{+}$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$. The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.

$\Gamma(K^{*}(892) \mu^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma^{*}(892) e^{+} e^{-})$

$\Gamma_{133}/\Gamma_{131}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.98 &pm; 0.15 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.13<sup>+0.34</sup><sub>-0.26</sub></td><td>0.10</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.37<sup>+0.53</sup><sub>-0.40</sub></td><td>0.09</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.83 &pm; 0.17</td><td>0.08</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.91 &pm; 0.45</td><td>0.06</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in the union of $0.10 &lt; q^2 &lt; 8.12 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$ and $q^2 &gt; 10.11 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$. LEES 12S reports also individual measurements $\Gamma(B \rightarrow K^{*}(892) \mu^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma(B \rightarrow K^{*}(892) e^{+} e^{-}) = 1.06^{+0.48}_{-0.33} \pm 0.08$ for $0.10 &lt; q^2 &lt; 8.12 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$ and $\Gamma(B \rightarrow K^{*}(892) \mu^{+} \mu^{-})/\Gamma(B \rightarrow K^{*}(892) e^{+} e^{-}) = 1.18^{+0.55}_{-0.37} \pm 0.11$ for $q^2 &gt; 10.11 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$.

$\Gamma(K \ell^{+} \ell^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{134}/\Gamma$

Test for $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.8 &pm; 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.7 &pm; 0.6</td><td>0.2</td><td>LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.8<sup>+0.5</sup><sub>-0.4</sub></td><td>0.3</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.9 &pm; 0.7</td><td>0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 12S</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.4 &pm; 0.7</td><td>0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.5<sup>+1.4</sup><sub>-1.3</sub></td><td>0.4</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>03U</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06J</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.8<sup>+1.0</sup><sub>-0.9</sub></td><td>0.3</td><td>3 ISHIKAWA</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by WEI 09A</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.5<sup>+2.5</sup><sub>-2.1</sub></td><td>0.6</td><td>4 ABE</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by ISHIKAWA 03</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;51</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>02L</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;17</td><td>90</td><td>5 ANDERSON</td><td>01B</td><td>CLE2 $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Assumes all four $B \rightarrow K \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$ modes having equal partial widths in the fit.

³Assumes equal production rate for charge and neutral $B$ meson pairs, isospin invariance, lepton universality for $B \rightarrow K \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$, and $B(B \rightarrow K^{*}(892) \mu^{+} \mu^{-}) = 1.33$. The second error is total systematic uncertainties including model dependence.

⁴Assumes lepton universality.

⁵The result is for di-lepton masses above 0.5 GeV.

$\Gamma(K^{*}(892) \ell^{+} \ell^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{135}/\Gamma$

Test for $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.5 &pm; 1.0 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.2<sup>+1.4</sup><sub>-1.3</sub></td><td>0.5</td><td>LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.7<sup>+1.1</sup><sub>-1.0</sub></td><td>0.9</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.1<sup>+1.9</sup><sub>-1.8</sub></td><td>0.7</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 12S</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.8<sup>+1.9</sup><sub>-1.7</sub></td><td>1.1</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.8<sup>+3.3</sup><sub>-2.9</sub></td><td>1.0</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>03U</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06J</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.5<sup>+2.6</sup><sub>-2.4</sub></td><td>0.8</td><td>3 ISHIKAWA</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by WEI 09A</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;31</td><td>90</td><td>1,4 AUBERT</td><td>02L</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 03U</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;33</td><td>90</td><td>5 ANDERSON</td><td>01B</td><td>CLE2 $e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Assumes the partial width ratio of electron and muon modes to be $\Gamma(B \rightarrow K^{*}(892) \mu^{+} \mu^{-}) = 1.33$.

³Assumes equal production rate for charge and neutral $B$ meson pairs, isospin invariance, lepton universality for $B \rightarrow K \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$, and $B(B \rightarrow K^{*}(892) \mu^{+} \mu^{-}) = 1.33$. The second error is total systematic uncertainties including model dependence.

⁴For averaging $K^{*}(892) \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ and $K^{*}(892) e^{+} e^{-}$ modes, AUBERT 02L assumed $B(B \rightarrow K^{*}(892) e^{+} e^{-})/B(B \rightarrow K^{*}(892) \mu^{+} \mu^{-}) = 1.2$.

⁵The result is for di-lepton masses above 0.5 GeV.
Γ(Kνν)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>136</sub>/Γ

<table><caption>Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current.</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 GRYGIER</td><td>17</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</caption><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>13i</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10Q</td><td>13i</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 13i</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

2 Also reported a limit < 3.2 × 10$^{-5}$ at 90% CL obtained using a fully reconstructed hadronic B-tag events.

Γ(K*νν)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>137</sub>/Γ

<table><caption>Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current.</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 GRYGIER</td><td>17</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</caption><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>13i</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;8 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BC</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 13i</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

2 Also reported a limit < 7.9 × 10$^{-5}$ at 90% CL obtained using a fully reconstructed hadronic B-tag events.

Γ(πνν)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>138</sub>/Γ

<table><caption>Test for lepton family number conservation. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.8 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 GRYGIER</td><td>17</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

Γ(πνν)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>139</sub>/Γ

<table><caption>Test for lepton family number conservation. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.8 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 GRYGIER</td><td>17</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

Γ(s e $^{±}$µ $^{∓}$)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>140</sub>/Γ

<table><caption>Test for lepton family number conservation. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>GLENN</td><td>98</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(πe $^{±}$µ $^{∓}$)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>141</sub>/Γ

<table><caption>Test for lepton family number conservation.</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;9.2 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AG</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</caption><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 EDWARDS</td><td>02B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

Γ(ρe $^{±}$µ $^{∓}$)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>142</sub>/Γ

<table><caption>Test for lepton family number conservation.</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 EDWARDS</td><td>02B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

Γ(K e $^{±}$µ $^{∓}$)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>143</sub>/Γ

<table><caption>Test for lepton family number conservation.</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 0.38</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</caption><tbody><tr><td>&lt;16</td><td>90</td><td>1 EDWARDS</td><td>02B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(K*(892) e $^{±}$µ $^{∓}$)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>144</sub>/Γ

<table><caption>Test for lepton family number conservation.</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 5.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</caption><tbody><tr><td>&lt;62</td><td>90</td><td>1 EDWARDS</td><td>02B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

CP VIOLATION

$A_{CP}$ is defined as

$$ \frac{B(B \to \bar{T}) - B(B \to f)}{B(B \to \bar{T}) + B(B \to f)} $$

the CP-violation charge asymmetry of inclusive B$^{±}$ and B$^{0}$ decay.

$A_{CP}(B \to K^*(892)\gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.003 ± 0.011</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.004 ± 0.014</td><td>0.003</td><td>1 HORIGUCHI</td><td>17 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.003 ± 0.017</td><td>0.007</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09A0 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.08 ± 0.13</td><td>0.03</td><td>3 COAN</td><td>00 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

-0.013 ± 0.036 ± 0.010 4 AUBERT, BE 04A BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09A0

-0.015 ± 0.044 ± 0.012 3 NAKAO 04 BELL Repl. by HORIGUCHI 17

-0.044 ± 0.076 ± 0.012 5 AUBERT 02C BABR Repl. by AUBERT, BE 04A

1 Uses B(T(4S) → B$^{+}$B$^{−}$) = (51.4 ± 0.6)% and B(T(4S) → B$^{0}$B$^{0}$) = (48.6 ± 0.6)%.

2 Corresponds to a 90% CL interval -0.033 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.028.

3 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S).

4 Corresponds to a 90% CL allowed region, -0.074 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.049.

5 A 90% CL range is -0.170 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.082.

$A_{CP}(B \to s\gamma)$ $A_{CP}(B \to s\gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.015 ± 0.011</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0144 ± 0.0128 ± 0.0011</td><td>1 WATANUKI</td><td>19 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.017 ± 0.019 ± 0.010</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>14k BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

-0.011 ± 0.030 ± 0.014 3 AUBERT 08BJ BABR Repl. by LEES 14K

0.025 ± 0.050 ± 0.015 4 AUBERT, B 04E BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08BJ

0.002 ± 0.050 ± 0.030 5 NISHIDA 04 BELL Repl. by WATANUKI 19

1 Using a sum-of-exclusive technique with $m_{X_S} < 2.8$ GeV/c$^2$.

2 Measured with 16 exclusively reconstructed B → X$_S$γ decays with 0.6 < $m_{X_S}$ < 2.0 GeV/c$^2$ (ten charged and six neutral self-tagging B modes).

3 Uses a sum of exclusively reconstructed B → X$_S$ decay modes, with X$_S$ mass between 0.6 and 2.8 GeV/c$^2$.

4 Corresponds to -0.06 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.11 at 90% CL.

5 This measurement is performed exclusively for recoil mass X$_S$ less than 2.1 GeV, which corresponds to -0.093 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.096 at 90% CL.

$A_{CP}(B \to (s + d)\gamma)$ $A_{CP}(B \to (s + d)\gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.010 ± 0.031</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.022 ± 0.039 ± 0.009</td><td>1 PESANTEZ</td><td>15 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.057 ± 0.060 ± 0.018</td><td>LEES</td><td>12V BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.10 ± 0.18 ± 0.05</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08O BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.110 ± 0.115 ± 0.017</td><td>AUBERT, BE</td><td>06B BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.079 ± 0.108 ± 0.022</td><td>3 COAN</td><td>01 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(4S). Uses an opposite side lepton tag. Requires center-of-mass frame $E_{γ} > 2.1$ GeV.

2 Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side. Requires $E_{γ} > 2.2$ GeV.

3 Corresponds to -0.27 < $A_{CP}$ < 0.10 at 90% CL.

$A_{CP}(B \to X_S \ell^+ \ell^-)$ $A_{CP}(B \to X_S \ell^+ \ell^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.04 ± 0.11 ± 0.01</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

-0.22 ± 0.26 ± 0.02 2 AUBERT, B 04I BABR Repl. by LEES 14D

1 Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K$^{+}$, K$^{+}$π$^{0}$, K$^{+}$π$^{−}$, K$^{+}$π$^{−}$π$^{0}$, K$^{+}$π$^{−}$π$^{+}$, K$^{0}$Sπ$^{+}$, and K$^{0}$Sπ$^{−}$π$^{0}$.

2 The final state flavor is determined by the kaon and pion charges where modes with X$_S$ = K$^{0}$S, K$^{0}$Sπ$^{0}$ or K$^{0}$Sπ$^{+}$π$^{−}$ are not used.

$A_{CP}(B \to X_S \ell^+ \ell^-)$ (1.0 < q$^2$ < 6.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$) $A_{CP}(B \to X_S \ell^+ \ell^-)$ (10.1 < q$^2$ < 12.9 or q$^2$ > 14.2 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.06 ± 0.22 ± 0.01</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K$^{+}$, K$^{+}$π$^{0}$, K$^{+}$π$^{−}$, K$^{+}$π$^{−}$π$^{0}$, K$^{+}$π$^{−}$π$^{+}$, K$^{0}$Sπ$^{+}$, and K$^{0}$Sπ$^{−}$π$^{0}$.

$A_{CP}(B \to X_S \ell^+ \ell^-)$ (10.1 < q$^2$ < 12.9 or q$^2$ > 14.2 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.19 ± 0.18</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K$^{+}$, K$^{+}$π$^{0}$, K$^{+}$π$^{−}$, K$^{+}$π$^{−}$π$^{0}$, K$^{+}$π$^{−}$π$^{+}$, K$^{0}$Sπ$^{+}$, and K$^{0}$Sπ$^{−}$ (pi$^{−}$)$^{0}$.

$A_{CP}(B \to K^* e^+ e^-)$ $A_{CP}(B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.18 ± 0.15 ± 0.01</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-)$ $A_{CP}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.03 ± 0.13 ± 0.02</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{CP}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-)$ $A_{CP}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.04 ± 0.07</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.03 ± 0.13 ± 0.01</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12S BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>+0.01 ± 0.16</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09T BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.10 ± 0.10 ± 0.01</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in the union of 0.10 < q$^2$ < 8.12 GeV$^2$/c$^4$ and q$^2$ > 10.11 GeV$^2$/c$^4$. LEES 12s reports also individual measurements $A_{CP}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) = -0.13^{+0.18}_{-0.19}$ ± 0.01 for 0.10 < q$^2$ < 8.12 GeV$^2$/c$^4$ and $A_{CP}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) = 0.16^{+0.18}_{-0.19}$ ± 0.01 for q$^2$ > 10.11 GeV$^2$/c$^4$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## $B^{\pm}/B^{0}$ ADMIXTURE

### $A_{CP}(B \to \eta \text{ anything})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.13 ± 0.04 <sup>+0.02</sup><sub>-0.03</sub></td><td>1 NISHIMURA</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $B \to \eta X_s$ with 0.4 < $m_{X_s}$ < 2.6 GeV/c².

### $\Delta A_{CP}(X_s \gamma) = A_{CP}(B^{\pm} \to X_s \gamma) - A_{CP}(B^{0} \to X_s \gamma)$

This is the isospin difference of the CP asymmetries.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.041 ± 0.023</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0369 ± 0.0265 ± 0.0076</td><td>1 WATANUKI</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.050 ± 0.039 ± 0.015</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>14k</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Using a sum-of-exclusive technique with $m_{X_s} < 2.8$ GeV/c².

² Measured with 16 exclusively reconstructed $B \to X_s \gamma$ decays with 0.6 < $m_{X_s}$ < 2.0 GeV/c² (ten charged and six neutral self-tagging B modes).

### $\bar{A}_{CP}(B \to X_s \gamma) = (A_{CP}(B^{+} \to X_s \gamma) + A_{CP}(B^{0} \to X_s \gamma))/2$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.0091 ± 0.0121 ± 0.0013</strong></td><td>1 WATANUKI</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Using a sum-of-exclusive technique with $m_{X_s} < 2.8$ GeV/c².

### $\Delta A_{CP}(B \to K^{*\gamma}) = A_{CP}(B^{+} \to K^{*+\gamma}) - A_{CP}(B^{0} \to K^{*0\gamma})$

This is the isospin difference of the CP asymmetries.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.024 ± 0.028 ± 0.005</strong></td><td>1 HORIGUCHI</td><td>17</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $B(T(4S) \to B^+ B^-) = (51.4 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(T(4S) \to B^0 \bar{B}^0) = (48.6 \pm 0.6)\%$.

### $\bar{A}_{CP}(B \to K^{*\gamma}) = (A_{CP}(B^{+} \to K^{*+\gamma}) + A_{CP}(B^{0} \to K^{*0\gamma}))/2$

This is the average CP asymmetry.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.001 ± 0.014 ± 0.003</strong></td><td>1 HORIGUCHI</td><td>17</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $B(T(4S) \to B^+ B^-) = (51.4 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(T(4S) \to B^0 \bar{B}^0) = (48.6 \pm 0.6)\%$.

## POLARIZATION IN B DECAY

In decays involving two vector mesons, one can distinguish among the states in which meson polarizations are both longitudinal (L) or both are transverse and parallel (||) or perpendicular (⊥) to each other with the parameters $\Gamma_L/\Gamma$, $\Gamma_⊥/\Gamma$, and the relative phases $\phi_\parallel$ and $\phi_\perp$. See the definitions in the note on "Polarization in B Decays" review in the $B^0$ Particle Listings.

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (q^2 > 0.1 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.63 + 0.18 <sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.19</sub> ± 0.05</strong></td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06j</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Results with different $q^2$ cuts are also reported.

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (m_{\ell\ell} < 2.5 \text{ GeV}/c^2)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.35 ± 0.16 ± 0.04</strong></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (m_{\ell\ell} > 3.2 \text{ GeV}/c^2)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.71 + 0.20 <sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.22</sub> ± 0.04</strong></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (0.10 < q^2 < 0.98 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.263 + 0.045 <sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.04</sub> ± 0.017</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (1.1 < q^2 < 2.5 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.660 + 0.083 <sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.07</sub> ± 0.022</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (0.1 < q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.34 + 0.08 <sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.07</sub> OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.37 + 0.10 ± 0.04</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV, K*0 μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.09 ± 0.03</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.30 ± 0.16 ± 0.02</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12i</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.29 + 0.21 <sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.18</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.60 + 0.00 <sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.28</sub></strong></td><td>1 CHATRCHYAN 13BL CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.00 + 0.13 <sup>+0.02</sup><sub>-0.00</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.53 + 0.32 <sup>+0.34</sup><sub>-0.34</sub> ± 0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12i</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ CHATRCHYAN 13BL uses, for this bin, $1.0 < q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (2.0 < q^2 < 4.3 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.77 ± 0.05</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.876 + 0.109 <sup>+0.017</sup><sub>-0.097</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.80 ± 0.08 ± 0.06</td><td>KHACHATRY...16d</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.74 + 0.10 <sup>+0.02</sup><sub>-0.09</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV, K*0 μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.65 ± 0.17 ± 0.03</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL CMS</td><td>CDF</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.37 + 0.25 <sup>+0.10</sup><sub>-0.24</sub></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12i</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.71 ± 0.24 ± 0.05</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.77 ± 0.15 ± 0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.40 + 0.32 <sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.33</sub></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12i</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (4.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.611 + 0.052 <sup>+0.017</sup><sub>-0.053</sub></strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (6.0 < q^2 < 8.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.579 ± 0.046 ± 0.015</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (4.3 < q^2 < 8.6 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.64 ± 0.06</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.57 ± 0.07 ± 0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV, K*0 μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.81 + 0.13 <sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.12</sub></td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL CMS</td><td>CDF</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 + 0.15 <sup>+0.09</sup><sub>-0.17</sub></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12i</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.64 + 0.23 <sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.24</sub></td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.60 + 0.06 <sup>+0.01</sup><sub>-0.07</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.82 + 0.19 <sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.23</sub></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12i</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (10.09 < q^2 < 12.86 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.448 ± 0.033</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.493 + 0.049 <sup>+0.013</sup><sub>-0.047</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.39 ± 0.05 ± 0.04</td><td>KHACHATRY...16d</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.48 + 0.08 <sup>+0.03</sup><sub>-0.09</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV, K*0 μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.45 + 0.10 <sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.11</sub></td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL CMS</td><td>CDF</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.47 ± 0.14 ± 0.03</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12i</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.17 + 0.17 <sup>+0.03</sup><sub>-0.15</sub></td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.41 ± 0.11 ± 0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.31 + 0.19 <sup>+0.02</sup><sub>-0.18</sub></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12i</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in $11.0 < q^2 < 12.5 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (15.0 < q^2 < 17.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.349 ± 0.039 ± 0.009</strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (17.0 < q^2 < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.354 + 0.049 <sup>+0.025</sup><sub>-0.048</sub></strong></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $F_L(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (14.18 < q^2 < 16.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.40 ± 0.06</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.48 + 0.05 <sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.06</sub></td><td>KHACHATRY...16d</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.33 + 0.08 <sup>+0.02</sup><sub>-0.07</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV, K*0 μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.53 ± 0.12 ± 0.03</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL CMS</td><td>CDF</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.29 + 0.14 <sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.13</sub></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12i</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.15 + 0.27 <sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.23</sub></td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.37 ± 0.09 ± 0.05</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.55 + 0.17 <sup>+0.02</sup><sub>-0.18</sub></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12i</td></tr></tbody></table>
<figure><img src="image_625.png" /></figure>

$F_L(B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-)$ (16.0 < $q^2$ < 19.0 GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.350&plusmn;0.019</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.345 &plusmn; 0.020 &plusmn; 0.007</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20Y LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.38 &plusmn; 0.05<br/>-0.06</td><td></td><td></td><td>KHACHATRY...16D CMS pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.38 &plusmn; 0.09<br/>-0.07</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV, K*0 &mu;<sup>+</sup> &mu;<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.44 &plusmn; 0.07 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>CHATRCHYAN13BL</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.20 &plusmn; 0.19<br/>-0.17</td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.12 &plusmn; 0.15<br/>-0.13</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$0.344^{+0.028}_{-0.030} \pm 0.008 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 16B \text{ LHCB} \quad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 20Y}$$

$$0.26^{+0.10}_{-0.08} \pm 0.03 \quad \text{AAIJ} \quad 12U \text{ LHCB} \quad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 13Y}$$

$$0.09^{+0.18}_{-0.14} \pm 0.03 \quad \text{AAALTONEN} \quad 11L \text{ CDF} \quad \text{Repl. by AAALTONEN 12I}$$

¹Measured in 15.0 < $q^2$ < 19.0 GeV$^2/c^4$.

$F_L(B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-)$ (1.0 < $q^2$ < 6.0 GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.67 &plusmn; 0.07</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor</td><td></td><td>of 2.8. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>0.700 &plusmn; 0.025 &plusmn; 0.013</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20Y LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.72 &plusmn; 0.06</td><td></td><td></td><td>KHACHATRY...16D CMS pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.24 &plusmn; 0.09<br/>-0.08</td><td>2</td><td>LEES</td><td>16C BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.65 &plusmn; 0.08<br/>-0.07</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV, K*0 &mu;<sup>+</sup> &mu;<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.69 &plusmn; 0.19<br/>-0.21</td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.67 &plusmn; 0.23 &plusmn; 0.05</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>0.690 &plusmn; 0.035</strong><sub>-0.036</sub> &plusmn; 0.017</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.68 &plusmn; 0.10 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td></td><td></td><td>CHATRCHYAN13BL CMS Repl. by KHACHATRYAN 16D</td></tr><tr><td>0.55 &plusmn; 0.10 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.50 &plusmn; 0.27<br/>-0.30</td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AAALTONEN 12I</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_626.png" /></figure>

¹Measured in 1.1 < $q^2$ < 6.0 GeV$^2/c^4$.

²Measured by combining $B^0$ and $B^+$ with $e$ and $\mu$ as leptons. Results are also provided separately for $B^0$ and $B^+$.

$F_L(B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-)$ (0.0 < $q^2$ < 4.3 GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.33</strong><sub>-0.13</sub><sup>+0.14</sup><sub>+0.03</sub></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$0.47^{+0.23}_{-0.24} \pm 0.03 \quad \text{AALTONEN} \quad 11L \text{ CDF} \quad \text{Repl. by AALTONEN 12I}$$

$P_\tau(B \to D^*\tau^+\nu_\tau)$

Measures difference in decay widths with positive and negative $\tau^+$ helicities normalized to the sum of those decay widths.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.38 &plusmn; 0.51</strong><sub>-0.16</sub><sup>+0.21</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1</td><td>HIROSE</td><td>17 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

$\Gamma_{L/\Gamma}$ in $B \to D^*\ell^+\ell_\ell$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.502 &plusmn; 0.012 &plusmn; 0.004</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹This is the $B^+ \to D^*0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell$ and $B^0 \to D^*- \ell^+ \nu_\ell$ average.

$\Gamma_{L/\Gamma}$ in $B \to D^*e^+\nu_e$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.485 &plusmn; 0.018 &plusmn; 0.005</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹This is the $B^+ \to D^*0 e^+ \nu_e$ and $B^0 \to D^*- e^+ \nu_e$ average.

$\Gamma_{L/\Gamma}$ in $B \to D^*\mu^+\nu_\mu$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.515 &plusmn; 0.017 &plusmn; 0.005</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹This is the $B^+ \to D^*0 \mu^+ \nu_\mu$ and $B^0 \to D^*- \mu^+ \nu_\mu$ average.

$\Delta(\Gamma_L/\Gamma)$ in $B \to D^*(\text{lepton})^+\nu_\ell$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.030 &plusmn; 0.025 &plusmn; 0.007</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹This is the $B^+$ and $B^0$ average.

PARTIAL BRANCHING FRACTIONS IN $B \to K^*(\ell^+\ell^-)$

$B(B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-)$ ($q^2 < 2.0$ GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.68 &plusmn; 0.23</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.89<sup>+0.52</sup><sub>-0.46</sub> &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>12S BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.73 &plusmn; 0.33 &plusmn; 0.10</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.46<sup>+0.40</sup><sub>-0.35</sub> &plusmn; 0.11</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$0.98 \pm 0.40 \pm 0.09 \quad \text{AALTONEN} \quad 11L \text{ CDF} \quad \text{Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI}$$

¹The value reported here from LEES 12S refers to 0.1 < $q^2$ < 2.0 GeV$^2/c^2$.

$B(B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-)$ (2.0 < $q^2$ < 4.3 GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.87 &plusmn; 0.17</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.95<sup>+0.35</sup><sub>-0.30</sub> &plusmn; 0.04</td><td>LEES</td><td>12S BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.82 &plusmn; 0.26 &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.86<sup>+0.31</sup><sub>-0.27</sub> &plusmn; 0.07</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$1.00 \pm 0.38 \pm 0.09 \quad \text{AALTONEN} \quad 11L \text{ CDF} \quad \text{Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI}$$

$B(B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-)$ (4.3 < $q^2$ < 8.68 GeV$^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.67 &plusmn; 0.29</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.82<sup>+0.56</sup><sub>-0.52</sub> &plusmn; 0.09</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>12S BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.72 &plusmn; 0.41 &plusmn; 0.14</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.37<sup>+0.47</sup><sub>-0.42</sub> &plusmn; 0.39</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$1.69 \pm 0.57 \pm 0.15 \quad \text{AALTONEN} \quad 11L \text{ CDF} \quad \text{Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI}$$

¹The value reported here from LEES 12S refers to 4.3 < $q^2$ < 8.12 GeV$^2/c^2$.
B($B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-$) (10.09 < $q^2$ < 12.86 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.93&plusmn;0.25</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.86<sup>+0.52</sup><sub>-0.48</sub> &plusmn; 0.10</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.77<sup>+0.34</sup><sub>-0.11</sub> &plusmn; 0.11</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.24<sup>+0.44</sup><sub>-0.40</sub> &plusmn; 0.19</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.97&plusmn;0.47&plusmn;0.17 AALTONEN 11L CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI

¹The value reported here from LEES 12s refers to 10.11 < $q^2$ < 12.89 GeV$^2$/c$^2$.

B($B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-$) (14.18 < $q^2$ < 16.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.21&plusmn;0.17</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.46<sup>+0.41</sup><sub>-0.36</sub> &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.21&plusmn;0.24&plusmn;0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.05<sup>+0.29</sup><sub>-0.26</sub> &plusmn; 0.08</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.51&plusmn;0.36&plusmn;0.13 AALTONEN 11L CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI

¹The value reported here from LEES 12s refers to 14.21 < $q^2$ < 16.0 GeV$^2$/c$^2$.

B($B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-$) (16.0 < $q^2$ GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.3 &plusmn; 0.4</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.3. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>1.02<sup>+0.47</sup><sub>-0.42</sub> &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.88&plusmn;0.22&plusmn;0.05</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.04<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.24</sub> &plusmn; 0.16</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.35&plusmn;0.37&plusmn;0.12 AALTONEN 11L CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.3&plusmn;0.4 (Error scaled by 2.3)

<figure><img src="image_627.png" /><figcaption>B($B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-$) (16.0 < $q^2$ GeV$^2$/c$^4$) (units 10$^{-7}$)</figcaption></figure>

B($B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-$) (1.0 < $q^2$ < 6.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.64&plusmn;0.26</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.05<sup>+0.53</sup><sub>-0.48</sub> &plusmn; 0.07</td><td>LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.48&plusmn;0.39&plusmn;0.12</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.49<sup>+0.45</sup><sub>-0.40</sub> &plusmn; 0.12</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.60&plusmn;0.54&plusmn;0.14 AALTONEN 11L CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI

B($B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-$) (0.0 < $q^2$ < 4.3 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2.53&plusmn;0.43&plusmn;0.15</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.98&plusmn;0.55&plusmn;0.18</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^+ \to K^*\mu^+\mu^-$) / B($B^+ \to K^*e^+e^-$) (0.045 < $q^2$ < 1.1 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.52</strong><sup>+0.36</sup><sub>-0.26</sub> &plusmn; 0.05</td><td>WEHLE</td><td>21</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^+ \to K^*\mu^+\mu^-$) / B($B^+ \to K^*e^+e^-$) (1.1 < $q^2$ < 6.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.96</strong><sup>+0.45</sup><sub>-0.29</sub> &plusmn; 0.11</td><td>WEHLE</td><td>21</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B^+ \to K^*\mu^+\mu^-$) / B($B^+ \to K^*e^+e^-$) (15.0 < $q^2$ < 19.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.18</strong><sup>+0.52</sup><sub>-0.32</sub> &plusmn; 0.10</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>WEHLE</td><td>21</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

B($B \to K\ell^+\ell^-$) ($q^2$ < 2.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.51&plusmn;0.16</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.9. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>0.71<sup>+0.20</sup><sub>-0.18</sub> &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.33&plusmn;0.10&plusmn;0.02</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.81<sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.16</sub> &plusmn; 0.05</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.38&plusmn;0.16&plusmn;0.03 AALTONEN 11L CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI

¹The value reported here from LEES 12s refers to 0.1 < $q^2$ < 2.0 GeV$^2$/c$^2$.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.51&plusmn;0.16 (Error scaled by 1.9)

<figure><img src="image_628.png" /><figcaption>B($B \to K\ell^+\ell^-$) ($q^2$ < 2.0 GeV$^2$/c$^4$) (units 10$^{-7}$)</figcaption></figure>

B($B \to K\ell^+\ell^-$) (2.0 < $q^2$ < 4.3 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.57</strong><sup>+0.10</sup><sub>-0.09</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td></tr><tr><td>0.49<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.13</sub> &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.77&plusmn;0.14&plusmn;0.05</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.46<sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.12</sub> &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.58&plusmn;0.19&plusmn;0.04 AALTONEN 11L CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI

B($B \to K\ell^+\ell^-$) (4.3 < $q^2$ < 8.68 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.00&plusmn;0.11</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.94<sup>+0.20</sup><sub>-0.19</sub> &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.05&plusmn;0.17&plusmn;0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.00<sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.18</sub> &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.93&plusmn;0.25&plusmn;0.06 AALTONEN 11L CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI

¹The value reported here from LEES 12s refers to 4.3 < $q^2$ < 8.12 GeV$^2$/c$^2$.

B($B \to K\ell^+\ell^-$) (10.09 < $q^2$ < 12.86 GeV$^2$/c$^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.57&plusmn;0.11</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>0.90<sup>+0.20</sup><sub>-0.19</sub> &plusmn; 0.04</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.48&plusmn;0.10&plusmn;0.03</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF p&pi; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.55<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.14</sub> &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.72&plusmn;0.17&plusmn;0.05 AALTONEN 11L CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI

¹The value reported here from LEES 12s refers to 10.11 < $q^2$ < 12.89 GeV$^2$/c$^2$.
<figure><img src="image_629.png" /></figure>

### $B(B \to K\ell^+\ell^-)$ (14.18 $< q^2 < 16.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.49&plusmn;0.07</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.49<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.14</sub> &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12s BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.52&plusmn;0.09 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p&pi;&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.38<sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.12</sub> &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.38&plusmn;0.12 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">¹The value reported here from LEES 12s refers to 14.21 $< q^2 < 16.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^2$.</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $B(B \to K\ell^+\ell^-)$ (16.0 $< q^2 < 2 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.52&plusmn;0.16</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 2.1. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>0.67<sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.21</sub> &plusmn; 0.05</td><td>LEES</td><td>12s BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.38&plusmn;0.09 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p&pi;&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.98<sup>+0.20</sup><sub>-0.18</sub> &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.35&plusmn;0.13 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_630.png" /></figure>

### $B(B \to K\ell^+\ell^-)$ (1.0 $< q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.33&plusmn;0.13</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.36<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.24</sub> &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>LEES</td><td>12s BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.29&plusmn;0.18 &plusmn; 0.08</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p&pi;&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.36<sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.21</sub> &plusmn; 0.08</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.01&plusmn;0.26 &plusmn; 0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $B(B \to K\ell^+\ell^-)$ (0.0 $< q^2 < 4.3 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.07&plusmn;0.17</strong> &plusmn; 0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p&pi;&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.96&plusmn;0.25 &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 11AI</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $B(B \to X_s \ell^+\ell^-)$ (1.0 $< q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.60<sup>+0.41</sup><sub>-0.39</sub> &plusmn; 0.25</strong></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured from sum of exclusive modes through $K^+$, $K^+\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^+$, $K_S^0$, $K_S^0\pi^0$, $K_S^0\pi^+$, $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^0$, and $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^-$ corrected for unobserved modes.

### $B(B \to X_s e^+e^-)$ (1.0 $< q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.93<sup>+0.47</sup><sub>-0.45</sub> &plusmn; 0.28</strong></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured from sum of exclusive modes through $K^+$, $K^+\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^+$, $K_S^0$, $K_S^0\pi^0$, $K_S^0\pi^+$, $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^0$, and $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^-$ corrected for unobserved modes.

### $B(B \to X_s \mu^+\mu^-)$ (1.0 $< q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.66<sup>+0.82</sup><sub>-0.76</sub> &plusmn; 0.31</strong></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured from sum of exclusive modes through $K^+$, $K^+\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^+$, $K_S^0$, $K_S^0\pi^0$, $K_S^0\pi^+$, $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^0$, and $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^-$ corrected for unobserved modes.

### $B(B \to X_s \ell^+\ell^-)$ (14.2 $< q^2 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.57<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.15</sub> &plusmn; 0.03</strong></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured from sum of exclusive modes through $K^+$, $K^+\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^+$, $K_S^0$, $K_S^0\pi^0$, $K_S^0\pi^+$, $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^0$, and $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^-$ corrected for unobserved modes.

### $B(B \to X_s e^+e^-)$ (14.2 $< q^2 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.56<sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.18</sub> &plusmn; 0.03</strong></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured from sum of exclusive modes through $K^+$, $K^+\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^+$, $K_S^0$, $K_S^0\pi^0$, $K_S^0\pi^+$, $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^0$, and $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^-$ corrected for unobserved modes.

### $B(B \to X_s \mu^+\mu^-)$ (14.2 $< q^2 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.60<sup>+0.31</sup><sub>-0.29</sub> &plusmn; 0.05</strong></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured from sum of exclusive modes through $K^+$, $K^+\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^0$, $K^+\pi^-\pi^+$, $K_S^0$, $K_S^0\pi^0$, $K_S^0\pi^+$, $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^0$, and $K_S^0\pi^+\pi^-$ corrected for unobserved modes.

## LEPTON (HADRON) FORWARD-BACKWARD ASYMMETRY
### IN $B \to K^*(\ell^+\ell^-) (B \to K/\pi h^+h^-)$ DECAY

The forward-backward angular asymmetry of the lepton pair in $B \to K^*(\ell^+\ell^-) (B \to K/\pi h^+h^-)$ decay is defined as

$$A_{FB}(s) = \frac{N(\cos\theta>0) - N(\cos\theta<0)}{N(\cos\theta>0) + N(\cos\theta<0)}$$

where $s=q^2/m_B^2$, and $\theta$ is the angle of the $\ell^-$ (h$^-$) with respect to the flight direction of the B meson, measured in the dilepton (dihadron) rest frame. In addition, the fraction of longitudinal polarization $F_L$ of the $K^+$ and $F_S$, the relative contribution from scalar and pseudoscalar penguin amplitudes in $B \to K\ell^+\ell^-$, can be measured from the angular distribution of its decay products.

### $A_{FB}(B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-)$ ($q^2 > 0.1 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.50&plusmn;0.15 &plusmn; 0.02</strong></td><td></td><td>1 ISHIKAWA</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&gt;0.55</td><td>95</td><td>2 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Using an unbinned max. likelihood fits to the $M_{bc}$ distribution in five $q^2$ bins for $\cos\theta >0$ and $\cos\theta <0$.

²Results with different $q^2$ cuts are also reported.

### $A_{FB}(B \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-)$ (0.1 $< q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.01&plusmn;0.14</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.02&plusmn;0.12 &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y LHCB</td><td>p&pi; at 7 TeV, $K^*0\mu^+\mu^-$</td></tr><tr><td>-0.35&plusmn;0.26<sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.21</sub> &plusmn; 0.10</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I CDF</td><td>p&pi;&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.47&plusmn;0.26<sup>+0.32</sup><sub>-0.30</sub> &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.29<sup>+0.37</sup><sub>-0.00</sub> &plusmn; 0.18</td><td>1 CHATRCHYAN 13BL CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.15&plusmn;0.20 &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.13<sup>+1.65</sup><sub>-0.75</sub> &plusmn; 0.25</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></tbody></table>
¹ CHATRCHYAN 13BL uses, for this bin, $1.0 < q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
-0.01±0.14 (Error scaled by 1.4)

<figure><img src="image_631.png" /></figure>

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-)$ (0.1 < $q^2$ < 2.0 GeV$^2/\text{c}^4$)

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (m_{\ell\ell} < 2.5 \text{ GeV}/c^2)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.24</b><sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.23</sub> ±0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (m_{\ell\ell} > 3.2 \text{ GeV}/c^2)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.76</b><sup>+0.52</sup><sub>-0.32</sub> ±0.07</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09N</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (0.10 < q^2 < 0.98 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>-0.003</b><sup>+0.058</sup><sub>-0.057</sub> ±0.009</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (1.1 < q^2 < 2.5 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>-0.191</b><sup>+0.068</sup><sub>-0.080</sub> ±0.012</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (2.0 < q^2 < 4.3 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>-0.14</b> ±0.05 <b>OUR AVERAGE</b></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.118<sup>+0.082</sup><sub>-0.090</sub> ±0.007</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.12<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.17</sub> ±0.05</td><td></td><td>KHACHATRY...16D</td><td>CMS pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.20 ±0.08 ±0.01</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y LHCB pp at 7 TeV, K*0 μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>-0.07 ±0.20 ±0.02</td><td></td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL</td><td>CMS pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.29<sup>+0.32</sup><sub>-0.35</sub> ±0.15</td><td></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I CDF p<sup>+</sup> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.11<sup>+0.31</sup><sub>-0.36</sub> ±0.07</td><td></td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.05<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.20</sub> ±0.04</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.19<sup>+0.40</sup><sub>-0.41</sub> ±0.14</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$.

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (0.0 < q^2 < 4.3 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>-0.08</b><sup>+0.21</sup><sub>-0.20</sub> ±0.05</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<sup>+</sup> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.21<sup>+0.31</sup><sub>-0.33</sub> ±0.05</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (4.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.025</b><sup>+0.051</sup><sub>-0.052</sub> ±0.004</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (6.0 < q^2 < 8.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.152</b><sup>+0.041</sup><sub>-0.040</sub> ±0.008</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (1.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td><b>-0.078</b> ±0.022 <b>OUR AVERAGE</b></td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.073 ±0.021 ±0.002</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20Y LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.12 ±0.08</td><td></td><td>KHACHATRY...16D</td><td>CMS pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.21<sup>+0.10</sup><sub>-0.15</sub> ±0.07</td><td>2</td><td>LEES</td><td>16C BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.17 ±0.06 ±0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV, K*0 μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.29<sup>+0.20</sup><sub>-0.23</sub> ±0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<sup>+</sup> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.26<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.30</sub> ±0.07</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.075<sup>+0.032</sup><sub>-0.034</sub> ±0.007</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.55 ±0.43</td><td>3</td><td>SATO</td><td>16 BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.07 ±0.12 ±0.01</td><td></td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL CMS</td><td>Repl. by KHACHATRYAN 16D</td></tr><tr><td>-0.06<sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.14</sub> ±0.07</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.43<sup>+0.36</sup><sub>-0.37</sub> ±0.06</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in $1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$.

² Measured by combining $B^0$ and $B^+$ with $e$ and $\mu$ as leptons. Results are also provided separately for $B^0$ and $B^+$.

³ Uses $K^+ \to K^- \pi^+$, $K^- \pi^0$, $K_S^0 \pi^-$ in the range $M(K\pi) < 1.1 \text{ GeV}/\text{c}^2$. Uncertainty is statistical only.

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (4.3 < q^2 < 8.6 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.13</b><sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.05</sub> <b>OUR AVERAGE</b></td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr><tr><td>0.16<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.05</sub> ±0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV, K*0 μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>-0.01 ±0.11 ±0.03</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL CMS</td><td>16B</td><td>CDF pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.01 ±0.20 ±0.09</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<sup>+</sup> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.45<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.21</sub> ±0.15</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.27<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.08</sub> ±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr><tr><td>-0.06<sup>+0.30</sup><sub>-0.28</sub> ±0.05</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></tbody></table>

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (10.09 < q^2 < 12.86 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.02</b> ±0.13 <b>OUR AVERAGE</b></td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 4.5. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.318<sup>+0.044</sup><sub>-0.040</sub> ±0.009</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.16 ±0.06 ±0.01</td><td></td><td>KHACHATRY...16D</td><td>CMS pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.28<sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.06</sub> ±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV, K*0 μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.40 ±0.08 ±0.05</td><td></td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.38<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.19</sub> ±0.09</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<sup>+</sup> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.43<sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.20</sub> ±0.03</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.27<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.13</sub> ±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr><tr><td>0.66<sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.20</sub> ±0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in $11.0 < q^2 < 12.5 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.02±0.13 (Error scaled by 4.5)

<figure><img src="image_632.png" /></figure>

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (10.09 < q^2 < 12.86 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

$A_{FB}(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) (14.18 < q^2 < 16.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.43</b><sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.06</sub> <b>OUR AVERAGE</b></td><td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.39<sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.06</sub> ±0.01</td><td>KHACHATRY...16D</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.51<sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.05</sub> ±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV, K*0 μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.29 ±0.09 ±0.05</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL CMS</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>
Meson Particle Listings
B$^{±}$/B$^{0}$ ADMIXTURE

<table><tr><td>0.44<sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.21</sub>±0.10</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.70<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.22</sub>±0.10</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.47<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.08</sub>±0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr></table>

<table><caption>WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.43+0.05-0.06 (Error scaled by 1.6)</caption><tr><td>0.42<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.09</sub>±0.09</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></table>

<figure><img src="image_633.png" /><figcaption>$A_{FB}(B \to K^*l^+l^-) (14.18 < q^2 < 16.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to K^*l^+l^-) (15.0 < q^2 < 17.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.411<sup>+0.41</sup><sub>-0.037</sub>±0.008</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to K^*l^+l^-) (17.0 < q^2 < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.305<sup>+0.049</sup><sub>-0.048</sub>±0.013</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to K^*l^+l^-) (16.0 < q^2 < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.362<sup>+0.019</sup>±0.098</td><td colspan="3"><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.353±0.020±0.010</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.35±0.07±0.01</td><td>KHACHATRY...16D</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.30±0.08<sup>+0.01</sup><sub>-0.02</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV, K*0 μ<sup>+</sup>μ<sup>-</sup></td></tr><tr><td>0.41±0.05±0.03</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.65<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.18</sub></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.66<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.16</sub>±0.04</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.355±0.027±0.009</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20Y</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.16<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.13</sub>±0.06</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.70<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.25</sub>±0.10</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></table>

¹Measured in 15.0 < q² < 19.0 GeV²/c⁴.

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to Kl^+l^-) (q^2 > 0.1 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.11<sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.23</sub>±0.08</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.10±0.14±0.01</td><td>2 ISHIKAWA</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Results with different q² cuts are also reported.

²Using an unbinned max. likelihood fits to the $M_{b\bar{b}}$ distribution in five q² bins for cos $\theta$ >0 and cos $\theta$ <0.

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to Kl^+l^-) (q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.00<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.05</sub>±0.07</td><td colspan="3"><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.00<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.05</sub>±0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.13<sup>+0.42</sup><sub>-0.43</sub>±0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.06<sup>+0.32</sup><sub>-0.35</sub>±0.02</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to Kl^+l^-) (2.0 < q^2 < 4.3 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><tr><td>-0.15<sup>+0.46</sup><sub>-0.39</sub>±0.08</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.09<sup>+0.10</sup><sub>-0.07</sub>±0.04</td><td colspan="3"><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.07<sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.05</sub>±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.32<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.16</sub>±0.05</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.43<sup>+0.38</sup><sub>-0.40</sub>±0.09</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to Kl^+l^-) (0.0 < q^2 < 4.3 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><tr><td>0.72<sup>+0.40</sup><sub>-0.35</sub>±0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></table>

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to Kl^+l^-) (1.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.31<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.04</sub>±0.04</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.36<sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.26</sub>±0.06</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.034<sup>+0.040</sup><sub>-0.029</sub>±0.04</td><td colspan="3"><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.02<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.03</sub>±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.13±0.09±0.02</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.04<sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.16</sub>±0.05</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.00±0.13</td><td>1 SATO</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.08<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.22</sub>±0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></table>

¹Statistical uncertainty only.

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to Kl^+l^-) (4.3 < q^2 < 8.6 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.04<sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.05</sub>±0.04</td><td colspan="3"><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>-0.02<sup>+0.03</sup><sub>-0.05</sub>±0.03</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.01<sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.10</sub>±0.01</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.20<sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.14</sub>±0.03</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to Kl^+l^-) (10.09 < q^2 < 12.86 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><tr><td>-0.20<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.28</sub>±0.03</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.05<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.05</sub>±0.06</td><td colspan="3"><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>-0.03<sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.01</sub>±0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.10</sub>±0.04</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.21<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.15</sub>±0.06</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to Kl^+l^-) (14.18 < q^2 < 16.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><tr><td>-0.10<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.15</sub>±0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.02<sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.05</sub>±0.07</td><td colspan="3"><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>-0.01<sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.06</sub>±0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.05<sup>+0.09</sup><sub>-0.11</sub>±0.03</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.04<sup>+0.32</sup><sub>-0.26</sub>±0.05</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to Kl^+l^-) (16.0 < q^2 < 18.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><tr><td>0.03<sup>+0.49</sup><sub>-0.16</sub>±0.04</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></table>

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to Kl^+l^-) (18.0 < q^2 < 22.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.09<sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.09</sub>±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>$A_{FB}(B \to Kl^+l^-) (q^2 > 16.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$</caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.02<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.01</sub>±0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.04<sup>+0.09</sup><sub>-0.07</sub>±0.07</td><td colspan="3"><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.09<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.13</sub>±0.03</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.02<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.08</sub>±0.02</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.07<sup>+0.30</sup><sub>-0.23</sub>±0.02</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11L</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12I</td></tr></table>
$A_{FB}(B \to X_5 \ell^+ \ell^-) (1.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.74 ± 0.54</td><td>1 SATO</td><td>16</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

1 Uses the sum of 10 exclusive $X_5$ modes in the range $M(X_5) > 1.1 \text{ GeV}/c^2$. Uncertainty is statistical only.

$F_S(B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-) (q^2 > 0.1 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.81<sup>+0.58</sup><sub>-0.61</sub> ± 0.46</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06J</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Results with different $q^2$ cuts are also reported.

$A_{FB}(B \to K p \bar{p}) (m_{p \bar{p}} < 2.85 \text{ GeV}/c^2)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.495 ± 0.012 ± 0.007</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AF</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹Measured in $B^+ \to K^+ p \bar{p}$ decays.

$A_{FB}(B \to \pi p \bar{p}) (m_{p \bar{p}} < 2.85 \text{ GeV}/c^2)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.409 ± 0.033 ± 0.006</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AF</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹Measured in $B^+ \to \pi^+ p \bar{p}$ decays.

$A_{FB}$ in $B \to D^* e^+ \nu_e$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.227 ± 0.020 ± 0.006</td><td>1 PRIM</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹This is the $B^+$ and $B^0$ average.

$A_{FB}$ in $B \to D^* \mu^+ \nu_\mu$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.256 ± 0.020 ± 0.005</td><td>1 PRIM</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹This is the $B^+$ and $B^0$ average.

$\Delta(A_{FB}) = (A_{FB}^\mu - A_{FB}^e)$ in $B^0 \to D^* \ell^- \nu_\ell$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.028 ± 0.028 ± 0.008</td><td>1 PRIM</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹This is the $B^+$ and $B^0$ average.

## ISOSPIN ASYMMETRY

$\Delta_{0-}$ is defined as

$$ \frac{\Gamma(B^0 \to \nu_d) - \Gamma(B^- \to \nu_d)}{\Gamma(B^0 \to \bar{\nu}_d) + \Gamma(B^- \to \bar{\nu}_d)} $$

the isospin asymmetry of inclusive neutral and charged B decay.

$\Delta_{0-}(B(B \to X_5 \gamma))$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.005 ± 0.020</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.0048 ± 0.0149 ± 0.0150</td><td>1 WATANUKI</td><td>19</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.006 ± 0.058 ± 0.026</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>05R</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Using a sum-of-exclusive technique with $m_{X_5} < 2.8 \text{ GeV}/c^2$.

$\Delta_{0-}(B(B \to X_a+d \gamma))$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.06 ± 0.15 ± 0.07</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08O</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side. The result is for $E_\gamma > 2.2 \text{ GeV}$.

$\Delta_{0+}(B \to K^*(892)\gamma)$

$\Delta_{0+}$ describes the isospin asymmetry between $\Gamma(B^0 \to K^*(892)0\gamma)$ and $\Gamma(B^+ \to K^*(892)\gamma^+)$.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.063 ± 0.017</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.062 ± 0.015 ± 0.013</td><td>1 HORIGUCHI</td><td>17</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.066 ± 0.021 ± 0.022</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09A0</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.050 ± 0.045 ± 0.037</td><td>3 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04A</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09A0</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.012 ± 0.044 ± 0.026</td><td>NAKAO</td><td>04</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by HORIGUCHI 17</td></tr></table>

¹Uses $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^+ \bar{B}^-) = (51.4 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^0 \bar{B}^0) = (48.6 \pm 0.6)\%$.

²Uses the production ratio of charged and neutral B from $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays and the lifetime ratio $\tau_{B^+}/\tau_{B^0} = 1.071 \pm 0.009$. The 90% CL interval is $0.017 < \Delta_{0+} < 0.116$.

³Uses the production ratio of charged and neutral B from $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays $R^{+0} = 1.006 \pm 0.048$ and the lifetime ratio of $\tau_{B^+} / \tau_{B^0} = 1.083 \pm 0.017$. The 90% CL interval is $-0.046 < \Delta_{0+} < 0.146$.

$\Delta_{\rho\gamma} = \Gamma(B^+ \to \rho^+ \gamma) / (2 \cdot \Gamma(B^0 \to \rho^0 \gamma)) - 1$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.46 ± 0.17</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.43 <sup>+0.25</sup><sub>-0.22</sub> ± 0.10</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BH</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.48 <sup>+0.21</sup><sub>-0.19</sub> ± 0.08</td><td>TANIGUCHI</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

$\Delta_{0-}(B(B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-))$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

-0.15 ± 0.06 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

<table><tr><td>-0.31 <sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.11</sub> ± 0.01</td><td>1 CHOUDHURY</td><td>21</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.10 <sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.09</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>14M</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.09 <sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.08</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>14M</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.58 <sup>+0.29</sup><sub>-0.37</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>4 LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.35 <sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.27</sub></td><td>5 AAIJ</td><td>12AH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14M</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-1.43 <sup>+0.56</sup><sub>-0.85</sub> ± 0.05</td><td>6,7 AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 12S</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.31 <sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.14</sub> ± 0.08</td><td>8,9 WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹For $1.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$ using both $\mu^+ \mu^-$ and $e^+ e^-$ as a lepton pair. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.

²For $1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$ using $\mu^+ \mu^-$ as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the $B \to J/\psi(1S) K$. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.

³For $15.0 < q^2 < 19.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$ using $\mu^+ \mu^-$ as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the $B \to J/\psi(1S) K$. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.

⁴For $0.10 < q^2 < 8.12 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.

⁵For $1 < q^2 < 6 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

⁶For $0.1 < m_{\ell^+ \ell^-}^2 < 7.02 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

⁷Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁸Superseded by CHOUDHURY 21.

⁹For $q^2 < 8.68 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

$\Delta_{0-}(B(B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-))$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

-0.03 ± 0.08 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

<table><tr><td>0.00 ± 0.12 <sub>-0.10</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14M</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.06 ± 0.10 <sub>-0.09</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>14M</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.25 ± 0.20 <sub>-0.17</sub> ± 0.03</td><td>3 LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.29 ± 0.16 ± 0.09</td><td>4 WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.15 ± 0.16</td><td>5 AAIJ</td><td>12AH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14M</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.56 ± 0.17 <sub>-0.15</sub> ± 0.03</td><td>6,7 AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 12S</td></tr></table>

¹For $1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$ using $\mu^+ \mu^-$ as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the $B(B \to J/\psi(1S) K^*(892))$. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.

²For $15.0 < q^2 < 22.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$ using $\mu^+ \mu^-$ as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the $B(B \to J/\psi(1S) K^*(892))$. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.

³For $0.10 < q^2 < 8.12 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.

⁴For $q^2 < 8.68 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

⁵For $1 < q^2 < 6 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

⁶For $0.1 < m_{\ell^+ \ell^-}^2 < 7.02 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

⁷Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Delta_{0-}(B(B \to K^*(\ell^+ \ell^-))$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

-0.45 ± 0.17 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.7.

<table><tr><td>-0.64 <sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.14</sub> ± 0.03</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>09T</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.30 <sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.11</sub> ± 0.08</td><td>3 WEI</td><td>09A</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹For $0.1 < m_{\ell^+ \ell^-}^2 < 7.02 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³For $q^2 < 8.68 \text{ GeV}^2/c^2$.

## $B \to X_c \ell \nu$ HADRONIC MASS MOMENTS

$\langle M_X^2 - M_D^2 \rangle$ (First Moments)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (GeV<sup>2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.36 ± 0.08 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.8.

<table><tr><td>0.467 ± 0.038 ± 0.068</td><td>1 ACOSTA</td><td>05F</td><td>CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.293 ± 0.012 ± 0.058</td><td>2 CSORNA</td><td>04</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.251 ± 0.023 ± 0.062</td><td>3 CRONIN-HEN-01B</td><td>CLE2</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Moments are measured with a minimum lepton momentum of 0.7 GeV/c in the B rest frame;

²Uses minimum lepton energy of 1.5 GeV and also reports moments with $E_\ell > 1.0 \text{ GeV}$.

³The leptons are required to have $P_\ell > 1.5 \text{ GeV/c}$.
### $\langle M_X^2 \rangle$ (First Moments)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (GeV<sup>2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>4.156 ± 0.029 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>4.144 ± 0.028 ± 0.022</td><td>1 SCHWANDA</td><td>07</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.18 ± 0.04 ± 0.03</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The leptons are required to have $E_\ell > 1.5$ GeV/c.

### $\langle (M_X^2 - M_X^2)^2 \rangle$ (Second Moments)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (GeV<sup>4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>0.55 ± 0.08 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>0.515 ± 0.061 ± 0.064</td><td>1 SCHWANDA</td><td>07</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.629 ± 0.031 ± 0.143</td><td>2 CSORNA</td><td>04</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.05 ± 0.26 ± 0.13</td><td>3 ACOSTA</td><td>05f</td><td>CDF pT at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.576 ± 0.048 ± 0.168</td><td>1 CRONIN-HEN..01B</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The leptons are required to have $E_\ell > 1.5$ GeV/c.

² Uses minimum lepton energy of 1.5 GeV and also reports moments with $E_\ell > 1.0$ GeV.

³ Moments are measured with a minimum lepton momentum of 0.7 GeV/c in the B rest frame;

### $\langle (M_X^2 - M_X^2)^2 \rangle$ (Second Moments)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (GeV<sup>4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.639 ± 0.056 ± 0.178</td><td>1 CRONIN-HEN..01B</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The leptons are required to have $E_\ell > 1.5$ GeV/c.

## B → X_cℓν LEPTON MOMENTUM MOMENTS

### $R_0 (\Gamma_{E_\ell} > 1.7 \text{GeV} / \Gamma_{E_\ell} > 1.5 \text{GeV})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.6187 ± 0.0014 ± 0.0016</td><td>1 MAHMOOD</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The leptons are required to have $E_\ell > 1.5$ GeV in the B rest frame.

### $R_1 (\langle E_\ell \rangle_{E_\ell} > 1.5 \text{GeV})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>1.7797 ± 0.0018 OUR AVERAGE</strong> Error includes scale factor of 1.8. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>1.7743 ± 0.0019 ± 0.0014</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.7792 ± 0.0021 ± 0.0027</td><td>2 MAHMOOD</td><td>04</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.7810 ± 0.0007 ± 0.0009</td><td>3 MAHMOOD</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.7797±0.0018 (Error scaled by 1.8)

<figure><img src="image_634.png" /></figure>

¹ The leptons are required to have $E_\ell > 1.5$ GeV in the B rest frame. The result with $E_\ell > 0.6$ GeV is also given.

² Uses $E_c > 1.5$ GeV and also reports moments with other minimum minimum $E_c$ conditions, as low as $E_c > 0.6$ GeV.

³ The leptons are required to have $E_\ell > 1.5$ GeV in the B rest frame.

### $R_2 (\langle E_\ell^2 - E_\ell^2 \rangle_{E_\ell} > 1.5 \text{GeV})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-3</sup> GeV<sup>2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>30.8 ± 0.8 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>30.3 ± 0.9 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>31.6 ± 0.8 ± 1.0</td><td>2 MAHMOOD</td><td>04</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The leptons are required to have $E_\ell > 1.5$ GeV in the B rest frame. The result with $E_\ell > 0.6$ GeV is also given.

² Uses $E_c > 1.5$ GeV and also reports moments with other minimum minimum $E_c$ conditions, as low as $E_c > 0.6$ GeV.

### $R_3 (\langle E_\ell^3 - E_\ell^3 \rangle_{E_\ell} > 1.5 \text{GeV})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-3</sup> GeV<sup>3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.12 ± 0.47 ± 0.20</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The leptons are required to have $E_\ell > 1.5$ GeV in the B rest frame. The result with $E_\ell > 0.6$ GeV is also given.

## B → X_sγ PHOTON ENERGY MOMENTS

### $\langle E_\gamma \rangle$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (GeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>2.314 ± 0.011 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>2.346 ± 0.018<sup>+0.027</sup><sub>-0.022</sub></td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12v</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.304 ± 0.014 ± 0.017</td><td>2,3 LEES</td><td>12v</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.311 ± 0.009 ± 0.015</td><td>3 LIMOSANI</td><td>09</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.289 ± 0.058 ± 0.027</td><td>3,4 AUBERT</td><td>08o</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.309 ± 0.023 ± 0.023</td><td>2,3 SCHWANDA</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.288 ± 0.025 ± 0.023</td><td>3 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06b</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 12v</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ LEES 12v uses $E_\gamma > 1.897$ GeV to calculate the moments; the moments are used to calculate the HQET parameters $m_b = 4.579^{+0.032}_{-0.029}$ GeV/c$^2$ and $\mu^2_\pi = 0.257^{+0.034}_{-0.039}$ GeV$^2$ in the shape function model. The same HQET parameters are also determined in the kinetic model.

² Results for different $E_\gamma$ threshold values are also measured.

³ The result is for $E_\gamma > 1.9$ GeV.

⁴ Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

### $\langle E_\gamma^2 \rangle - \langle E_\gamma \rangle^2$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-2</sup> GeV<sup>2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>3.03 ± 0.25 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>2.11 ± 0.57<sup>+0.55</sup><sub>-0.69</sub></td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12v</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.62 ± 0.33 ± 0.33</td><td>2,3 LEES</td><td>12v</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.02 ± 0.19 ± 0.30</td><td>3 LIMOSANI</td><td>09</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.34 ± 1.24 ± 0.62</td><td>3,4 AUBERT</td><td>08o</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.17 ± 0.60 ± 0.55</td><td>2,3 SCHWANDA</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.28 ± 0.40 ± 0.43</td><td>3 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06b</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 12v</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ LEES 12v uses $E_\gamma > 1.897$ GeV to calculate the moments; the moments are used to calculate the HQET parameters $m_b = 4.579^{+0.032}_{-0.029}$ GeV/c$^2$ and $\mu^2_\pi = 0.257^{+0.034}_{-0.039}$ GeV$^2$ in the shape function model. The same HQET parameters are also determined in the kinetic model.

² Results for different $E_\gamma$ threshold values are also measured.

³ The result is for $E_\gamma > 1.9$ GeV.

⁴ Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

## B$^{±}$/B$^{0}$ ADMIXTURE REFERENCES

<table><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AR</td><td>PRL 131 111802</td><td>R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AGGARWAL</td><td>23</td><td>PRL 131 051804</td><td>L. Aggarwal et al. (BELLE II Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CAO</td><td>23</td><td>PRL 131 211801</td><td>L. Cao et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PRIM</td><td>23</td><td>PR D108 012002</td><td>M.T. Prim et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ZHUKOVA</td><td>23</td><td>JHEP 2308 131</td><td>V. Zhukova et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CAO</td><td>21A</td><td>PR D104 012008</td><td>L. Cao et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHOUDHURY</td><td>21</td><td>JHEP 2103 105</td><td>S. Choudhury et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>WEHLE</td><td>21</td><td>PRL 126 161801</td><td>S. Wehle et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>20V</td><td>PRL 125 011802</td><td>R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CARIA</td><td>20</td><td>PRL 124 161803</td><td>G. Garcia et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AD</td><td>PR D100 031102</td><td>R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>WATANUKI</td><td>19</td><td>PR D99 032012</td><td>S. Watanuki et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>GRYGIER</td><td>17</td><td>PR D96 091101</td><td>J. Grygier et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HIROSE</td><td>17</td><td>PR 118 211801</td><td>S. Hirose et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>17</td><td>PR D97 012004</td><td>S. Hirose et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HORIGUCHI</td><td>17</td><td>PRL 119 191802</td><td>T. Horiguchi et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>17</td><td>PR D95 072001</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>16B</td><td>JHEP 1602 104</td><td>R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>PR D93 052016</td><td>V. Bhardwaj et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>KHACHATRY</td><td>16D</td><td>PL B753 424</td><td>V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>16</td><td>PR D116 041801</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>16C</td><td>PR D93 052015</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SATO</td><td>16</td><td>PR D93 032008</td><td>Y. Sato et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>16</td><td>PR D93 059901 (errat.)</td><td>Y. Sato et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HUSCHLE</td><td>15</td><td>PR D92 072014</td><td>M. Huschle et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PESANTEZ</td><td>15</td><td>PR 114 151601</td><td>L. Pesantez et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SAITO</td><td>15</td><td>PR D91 052004</td><td>T. Saito et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AF</td><td>PRL 113 141801</td><td>R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>14M</td><td>JHEP 1406 133</td><td>R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>14D</td><td>PRL 112 211802</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>14K</td><td>PR D90 092001</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13H</td><td>JHEP 1302 105</td><td>R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>JHEP 1308 131</td><td>R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHATRCHYAN</td><td>13BL</td><td>PL B727 77</td><td>S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>13I</td><td>PR D87 112005</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>13M</td><td>PR D88 032012</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AH</td><td>JHEP 1207 133</td><td>R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U</td><td>PRL 108 181806</td><td>R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.) (CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12I</td><td>PRL 108 081807</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12</td><td>PR D85 011102</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12D</td><td>PR 109 101802</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>12R</td><td>PR D88 072012</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12S</td><td>PR D86 032012</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12U</td><td>PR D86 052012</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LEES</td><td>12V</td><td>PRL 109 191801</td><td>J.P. Lees (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>12W</td><td>PR D86 112008</td><td>J.P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>PRL 107 201802</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11I</td><td>PRL 106 161801</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>11</td><td>PR D83 031103</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>GAMBINO</td><td>11</td><td>JHEP 1109 055</td><td>P. Gambino (LCGT) (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>10</td><td>PRL 104 011802</td><td>B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>10A</td><td>PR D81 032003</td><td>B. Aubert et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUSHEV</td><td>10</td><td>PR D81 031103</td><td>T. Aushev et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>10M</td><td>PR D82 051101</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td><td>10Q</td><td>PR D82 112002</td><td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>NISHIMURA</td><td>10</td><td>PRL 105 191803</td><td>K. Nishimura et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>URQUIDO</td><td>10</td><td>PRL 104 021801</td><td>P. Urquido et al. (BELLE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09A</td><td>PRL 103 211802</td><td>B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09N</td><td>PR D79 031102</td><td>B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.)</td></tr></tbody></table>
$B^{\pm}/B^{0}/B_{s}^{0}/b$-baryon ADMIXTURE

$B^{\pm}/B^{0}/B_{s}^{0}/b$-baryon ADMIXTURE MEAN LIFE

Each measurement of the *B* mean life is an average over an admixture of various bottom mesons and baryons which decay weakly. Different techniques emphasize different admixtures of produced particles, which could result in a different *B* mean life.

"OUR EVALUATION" is an average using rescaled values of the data listed below. This is a weighted average of the lifetimes of the five main b-hadron species ($B^{+}$, $B^{0}$, $B_{sH}^{0}$, $B_{sL}^{0}$, and $\Lambda_{b}$) that assumes the production fractions in *Z* decays (given at the end of this section) and equal production fractions of $B_{sH}^{0}$ and $B_{sL}^{0}$ mesons.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.5673 &plusmn; 0.0029</td><td>OUR EVALUATION</td><td colspan="3">(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr><tr><td>1.570 &plusmn; 0.005</td><td>0.008</td><td>1 ABDALLAH</td><td>04E</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.533 &plusmn; 0.015</td><td>+0.035<br/>-0.031</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>98b</td><td>CDF p&pi;&#773; at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.549 &plusmn; 0.009</td><td>&plusmn;0.015</td><td>3 ACKIARRI</td><td>98</td><td>L3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.611 &plusmn; 0.010</td><td>&plusmn;0.027</td><td>4 ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97F</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.582 &plusmn; 0.011</td><td>&plusmn;0.027</td><td>4 ABREU</td><td>96E</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.575 &plusmn; 0.010</td><td>&plusmn;0.026</td><td>5 ABREU</td><td>96E</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.533 &plusmn; 0.013</td><td>+0.029.8k</td><td>6 BUSKULIC</td><td>96f</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.564 &plusmn; 0.030</td><td>&plusmn;0.036</td><td>7 ABE,K</td><td>95b</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.542 &plusmn; 0.021</td><td>&plusmn;0.045</td><td>8 ABREU</td><td>94l</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.50 &plusmn; 0.24</td><td>+0.03</td><td>9 ABREU</td><td>94p</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.46 &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>+0.06 5344</td><td>10 ABE</td><td>93J</td><td>CDF Repl. by ABE 98B</td></tr><tr><td>1.23 &plusmn; 0.14</td><td>+0.15 188</td><td>11 ABREU</td><td>93D</td><td>DLPH Sup. by ABREU 94L</td></tr><tr><td>1.49 &plusmn; 0.11</td><td>+0.12 253</td><td>12 ABREU</td><td>93G</td><td>DLPH Sup. by ABREU 94L</td></tr><tr><td>1.51 &plusmn; 0.16</td><td>+0.14 130</td><td>13 ACTON</td><td>93C</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.523 &plusmn; 0.034</td><td>+0.038 372</td><td>14 ACTON</td><td>93L</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.535 &plusmn; 0.035</td><td>+0.028 357</td><td>14 ADRIANI</td><td>93k</td><td>L3 Repl. by ACCIARRI 98</td></tr><tr><td>1.511 &plusmn; 0.022</td><td>+0.078</td><td>15 BUSKULIC</td><td>93o</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.28 &plusmn; 0.10</td><td></td><td>16 ABREU</td><td>92</td><td>DLPH Sup. by ABREU 94L</td></tr><tr><td>1.37 &plusmn; 0.07</td><td>+0.06 1354</td><td>17 ACTON</td><td>92</td><td>OPAL Sup. by ACTON 93L</td></tr><tr><td>1.49 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>&plusmn;0.06</td><td>18 BUSKULIC</td><td>92f</td><td>Alep Sup. by BUSKULIC 96F</td></tr><tr><td>1.35 &plusmn; 0.19</td><td>+0.05</td><td>19 BUSKULIC</td><td>92g</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.32 &plusmn; 0.08</td><td>+0.09 1386</td><td>20 ADEVA</td><td>91H</td><td>L3 Sup. by ADRIANI 93k</td></tr><tr><td>1.32 &plusmn; 0.31</td><td>+0.15 37</td><td>21 ALEXANDER</td><td>91G</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.29 &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>+0.10 2973</td><td>22 DECAMP</td><td>91C</td><td>Alep Sup. by BUSKULIC 92F</td></tr><tr><td>1.36 &plusmn; 0.25</td><td>+0.23</td><td>23 HAGEMANN</td><td>90</td><td>JADE E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 35 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.13 &plusmn; 0.15</td><td></td><td>24 LYONS</td><td>90</td><td>RVUE</td></tr><tr><td>1.35 &plusmn; 0.10</td><td>&plusmn;0.24</td><td>BRAUNSCH...</td><td>89b</td><td>TASS E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 35 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.98 &plusmn; 0.12</td><td>+0.13</td><td>ONG</td><td>89</td><td>MRK2 E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 29 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.17 &plusmn; 0.27</td><td>+0.17</td><td>KLEM</td><td>88</td><td>DLCO E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 29 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.29 &plusmn; 0.20</td><td>&plusmn;0.21</td><td>25 ASH</td><td>87</td><td>MAC E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 29 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.02 &plusmn; 0.42</td><td>+0.39</td><td>26 BROM</td><td>87</td><td>HRS E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 29 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measurement performed using an inclusive reconstruction and *B* flavor identification technique.

² Measured using inclusive $J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ vertex.

³ ACKIARRI 97F uses inclusively reconstructed secondary vertex and lepton impact parameter.

⁴ ACKERSTAFF 97F uses inclusively reconstructed secondary vertices.

⁵ Combines ABREU 96c secondary vertex result with ABREU 94L impact parameter result.

⁶ BUSKULIC 96F analyzed using 3D impact parameter.

⁷ ABE,K 95b uses an inclusive topological technique.

⁸ ABREU 94L uses charged particle impact parameters. Their result from inclusively reconstructed secondary vertices is superseded by ABREU 96E.

⁹ From proper time distribution of $b \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)$ anything.

¹⁰ ABE 93J analyzed using $J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ vertices.

¹¹ ABREU 93d data analyzed using $D/D^{*} \ell$ anything event vertices.

¹² ABREU 93g data analyzed using charged and neutral vertices.

¹³ ACTON 93c analyzed using $D/D^{*} \ell$ anything event vertices.

¹⁴ ACTON 93L and ADRIANI 93k analyzed using lepton ($e$ and $\mu$) impact parameter at $Z$.

¹⁵ BUSKULIC 93o analyzed using dipole method.

¹⁶ ABREU 92 is combined result of muon and hadron impact parameter analyses. Hadron tracks gave $(12.7 \pm 0.4 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-13}$ s for an admixture of *B* species weighted by production fraction and mean charge multiplicity, while muon tracks gave $(13.0 \pm 1.0 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-13}$ s for an admixture weighted by production fraction and semileptonic branching fraction.

¹⁷ ACTON 92 is combined result of muon and electron impact parameter analyses.

¹⁸ BUSKULIC 92F uses the lepton impact parameter distribution for data from the 1991 run.

¹⁹ BUSKULIC 92g use $J/\psi(1S)$ tags to measure the average *b* lifetime. This is comparable to other methods only if the $J/\psi(1S)$ branching fractions of the different *b*-flavored hadrons are in the same ratio.

²⁰ Using $Z \rightarrow e^{+}X$ or $\mu^{+}X$, ADEVA 91H determined the average lifetime for an admixture of *B* hadrons from the impact parameter distribution of the lepton.

²¹ Using $Z \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)X$, $J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-}$, ALEXANDER 91G determined the average lifetime for an admixture of *B* hadrons from the decay point of the $J/\psi(1S)$.

²² Using $Z \rightarrow eX$ or $\mu X$, DECAMP 91C determines the average lifetime for an admixture of *B* hadrons from the signed impact parameter distribution of the lepton.

²³ HAGEMANN 90 uses electrons and muons in an impact parameter analysis.

²⁴ LYONS 90 combine the results of the *B* lifetime measurements of ONG 89, BRAUNSCHWEIG 89b, KLEM 88, and ASH 87, and JADE data by private communication. They use statistical techniques which include variation of the error with the mean life, and possible correlations between the systematic errors. This result is not independent of the measured results used in our average.

²⁵ We have combined an overall scale error of 15% in quadrature with the systematic error of $\pm 0.7$ to obtain $\pm 2.1$ systematic error.

²⁶ Statistical and systematic errors were combined by BROM 87.

CHARGED b-HADRON ADMIXTURE MEAN LIFE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.72 &plusmn; 0.08 &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>1 ADAM</td><td>95</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ ADAM 95 data analyzed using vertex-charge technique to tag *b*-hadron charge.

NEUTRAL b-HADRON ADMIXTURE MEAN LIFE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.58 &plusmn; 0.11 &plusmn; 0.09</td><td>1 ADAM</td><td>95</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ ADAM 95 data analyzed using vertex-charge technique to tag *b*-hadron charge.

MEAN LIFE RATIO $\tau_{\text{charged b-hadron}}/\tau_{\text{neutral b-hadron}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.09<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.10</sub> &plusmn; 0.08</td><td>1 ADAM</td><td>95</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ ADAM 95 data analyzed using vertex-charge technique to tag *b*-hadron charge.

$|\Delta\tau_b|/\tau_{b,\bar{b}}$

$\tau_{b,\bar{b}}$ and $|\Delta\tau_b|$ are the mean life average and difference between *b* and $\bar{b}$ hadrons.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.001 &plusmn; 0.012 &plusmn; 0.008</td><td>1 ABBIENDI</td><td>99J</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Data analyzed using both the jet charge and the charge of secondary vertex in the opposite hemisphere.

b PRODUCTION FRACTIONS AND DECAY MODES

The branching fraction measurements are for an admixture of *B* mesons and baryons at energies above the $\tau(45)$. Only the highest energy results (LHC, LEP, Tevatron, $Sp(pS)$) are used in the branching fraction averages. In the following, we assume that the production fractions are the same at the LHC, LEP, and at the Tevatron.

For inclusive branching fractions, e.g., $B \rightarrow D^{\pm}$ anything, the values usually are multiplicities, not branching fractions. They can be greater than one.

The modes below are listed for a $\bar{b}$ initial state. *b* modes are their charge conjugates. Reactions indicate the weak decay vertex and do not include mixing.

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>f</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Scale factor/ Confidence level</th></tr></thead></table>

PRODUCTION FRACTIONS

The production fractions for weakly decaying *b*-hadrons at high energy have been calculated from the best values of mean lives, mixing parameters, and branching fractions in this edition by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV) as described in the note "$B^{0}$-$\bar{B}^{0}$ Mixing" in the $B^{0}$ Particle Listings. We no longer provide world averages of the *b*-hadron production fractions, where results from LEP, Tevatron and LHC are averaged together; indeed the available data (from CDF and LHCb) shows that the fractions depend on the kinematics (in particular the $p_T$) of the produced *b* hadron. Hence we would like to list the fractions in *Z* decays instead, which are well-defined physics observables. The production fractions in $p\bar{p}$ collisions at the Tevatron are also listed at the end of the section. Values assume

$$B(\bar{b} \rightarrow B^{+}) = B(\bar{b} \rightarrow B^{0})$$

$$B(\bar{b} \rightarrow B^{+}) + B(\bar{b} \rightarrow B^{0}) + B(\bar{b} \rightarrow B_{s}^{0}) + B(\bar{b} \rightarrow b\text{-baryon}) = 100\%.$$

The correlation coefficients between production fractions are also reported:

$$\text{cor}(B_{s}^{0}, \text{b-haryon}) = 0.064$$

$$\text{cor}(B_{s}^{0}, B^{\pm}=B^{0}) = -0.633$$

$$\text{cor}(b\text{-baryon}, B^{\pm}=B^{0}) = -0.813.$$
The notation for production fractions varies in the literature ($f_d$, $d_{B^0}$, $f(b \to \bar{B}^0)$, Br($b \to \bar{B}^0$)). We use our own branching fraction notation here, $B(\bar{b} \to B^0)$.

Note these production fractions are b-hadronization fractions, not the conventional branching fractions of b-quark to a B-hadron, which may have considerable dependence on the initial and final state kinematic and production environment.

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub></td><td>B<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 40.8 ± 0.7 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub></td><td>B<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 40.8 ± 0.7 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub></td><td>B<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub></td><td>( 10.0 ± 0.8 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub></td><td>B<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>5</sub></td><td>b-baryon</td><td>( 8.4 ± 1.1 ) %</td></tr></table>

DECAY MODES

Semileptonic and leptonic modes

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>6</sub></td><td>ν anything</td><td>( 23.1 ± 1.5 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>7</sub></td><td>ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>[a] ( 10.69 ± 0.22 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>8</sub></td><td>e<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>e</sub> anything</td><td>( 10.86 ± 0.35 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>9</sub></td><td>μ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>μ</sub> anything</td><td>( 10.95<sup>+0.29</sup><sub>-0.25</sub> ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>10</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>[a] ( 2.2 ± 0.4 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>11</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 4.9 ± 1.9 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>12</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup> π<sup>-</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 2.6 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>13</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>[a] ( 6.79 ± 0.34 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>14</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 1.07 ± 0.27 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>15</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 2.3 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>16</sub></td><td>D<sup>*-</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>[a] ( 2.75 ± 0.19 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>17</sub></td><td>D<sup>*-</sup> π<sup>-</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 6 ± 7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>18</sub></td><td>D<sup>*-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 4.8 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>19</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>j</sub> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything × B(D<sup>0</sup><sub>j</sub> → D<sup>*+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>[a,b] ( 2.6 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>20</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup><sub>j</sub> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything × B(D<sup>-</sup><sub>j</sub> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>[a,b] ( 7.0 ± 2.3 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>21</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>0</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything × B(D<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>*-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>)</td><td>< 1.4 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>22</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>-</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything × B(D<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>-</sup> → D<sup>0</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)</td><td>( 4.2 <sup>+1.5</sup><sub>-1.8</sub> ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>23</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>0</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything × B(D<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>)</td><td>( 1.6 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>24</sub></td><td>charmless ℓ̄ν<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>[a] ( 1.7 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>25</sub></td><td>τ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>τ</sub> anything</td><td>( 2.41 ± 0.23 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>26</sub></td><td>D<sup>*-</sup> τ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>τ</sub> anything</td><td>( 9 ± 4 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>27</sub></td><td>c̄ → ℓ<sup>-</sup> ν̄ℓ anything</td><td>[a] ( 8.02 ± 0.19 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>28</sub></td><td>c → ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν anything</td><td>( 1.6 <sup>+0.4</sup><sub>-0.5</sub> ) %</td></tr></table>

Charmed meson and baryon modes

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>29</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>( 58.7 ± 2.8 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>30</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sup>±</sup><sub>s</sub> anything</td><td>[c] ( 9.1 <sup>+4.0</sup><sub>-2.8</sub> ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>31</sub></td><td>D<sup>±</sup> D<sup>±</sup><sub>s</sub> anything</td><td>[c] ( 4.0 <sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-1.8</sub> ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>32</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>[c] ( 5.1 <sup>+2.0</sup><sub>-1.8</sub> ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>33</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sup>±</sup> anything</td><td>[c] ( 2.7 <sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-1.6</sub> ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>34</sub></td><td>D<sup>±</sup> D<sup>∓</sup> anything</td><td>[c] < 9 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>35</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>36</sub></td><td>D<sup>+</sup> anything</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>37</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup> anything</td><td>( 22.7 ± 1.6 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>38</sub></td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> anything</td><td>( 17.3 ± 2.0 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>39</sub></td><td>D<sub>1</sub>(2420)<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>( 5.0 ± 1.5 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>40</sub></td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>∓</sup> D<sup>±</sup><sub>s</sub> anything</td><td>[c] ( 3.3 <sup>+1.6</sup><sub>-1.3</sub> ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>41</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>±</sup> anything</td><td>[c] ( 3.0 <sup>+1.1</sup><sub>-0.9</sub> ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>42</sub></td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>±</sup> D<sup>∓</sup> anything</td><td>[c] ( 2.5 <sup>+1.2</sup><sub>-1.0</sub> ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>43</sub></td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>±</sup> D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>∓</sup> anything</td><td>[c] ( 1.2 ± 0.4 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>44</sub></td><td>D̄D anything</td><td>( 10 <sup>+11</sup><sub>-10</sub> ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>45</sub></td><td>D<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub>(2460)<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>( 4.7 ± 2.7 ) %</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>46</sub></td><td>D<sup>-</sup><sub>s</sub> anything</td><td>( 14.7 ± 2.1 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>47</sub></td><td>D<sup>+</sup><sub>s</sub> anything</td><td>( 10.1 ± 3.1 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>48</sub></td><td>Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> anything</td><td>( 7.8 ± 1.1 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>49</sub></td><td>c̄/c anything</td><td>[d] ( 116.2 ± 3.2 ) %</td></tr></table>

Charmonium modes

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>50</sub></td><td>J/ψ(1S) anything</td><td>( 1.16 ± 0.10 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>51</sub></td><td>ψ(2S) anything</td><td>( 3.06 ± 0.30 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>52</sub></td><td>χ<sub>c0</sub>(1P) anything</td><td>( 1.4 ± 0.5 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>53</sub></td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub>(1P) anything</td><td>( 1.4 ± 0.4 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>54</sub></td><td>χ<sub>c2</sub>(1P) anything</td><td>( 5.5 ± 2.4 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>55</sub></td><td>χ<sub>c</sub>(2P) anything, χ<sub>c</sub> → φφ</td><td>< 2.8 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>56</sub></td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(1S) anything</td><td>( 5.6 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>57</sub></td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(2S) anything, η<sub>c</sub> → φφ</td><td>( 4.1 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>58</sub></td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872) anything, χ<sub>c1</sub> → φφ</td><td>< 4.5 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>59</sub></td><td>χ<sub>c0</sub>(3915) anything, χ<sub>c0</sub> → φφ</td><td>< 3.1 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr></table>

K or K\* modes

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>60</sub></td><td>s̄γ</td><td>( 3.1 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>61</sub></td><td>s̄νγ</td><td>< 6.4 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>62</sub></td><td>K<sup>±</sup> anything</td><td>( 74 ± 6 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>63</sub></td><td>K<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub> anything</td><td>( 29.0 ± 2.9 ) %</td></tr></table>

Pion modes

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>64</sub></td><td>π<sup>±</sup> anything</td><td>( 397 ± 21 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>65</sub></td><td>π<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>[d] ( 280 ± 60 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>66</sub></td><td>φ anything</td><td>( 2.82 ± 0.23 ) %</td></tr></table>

Baryon modes

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>67</sub></td><td>p̄/D anything</td><td>( 13.1 ± 1.1 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>68</sub></td><td>Λ/Λ anything</td><td>( 5.9 ± 0.6 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>69</sub></td><td>b̄-baryon anything</td><td>( 10.2 ± 2.8 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>70</sub></td><td>Λ̄<sub>b</sub> anything</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>71</sub></td><td>Ξ<sup>+</sup><sub>b</sub> anything</td><td></td></tr></table>

Other modes

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>72</sub></td><td>charged anything</td><td>[d] ( 497 ± 7 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>73</sub></td><td>hadron<sup>+</sup> hadron<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.7 <sup>+1.0</sup><sub>-0.7</sub> ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>74</sub></td><td>charmless</td><td>( 7 ± 21 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr></table>

$ΔB = 1$ weak neutral current (B1) modes

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>75</sub></td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> anything</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>76</sub></td><td>μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup> anything</td><td>B1 < 3.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>77</sub></td><td>ν̄ν anything</td><td>CL=90%</td></tr></table>

[a] An ℓ indicates an e or a μ mode, not a sum over these modes.

[b] $D_j$ represents an unresolved mixture of pseudoscalar and tensor $D^{**}$ (P-wave) states.

[c] The value is for the sum of the charge states or particle/antiparticle states indicated.

[d] Inclusive branching fractions have a multiplicity definition and can be greater than 100%.

$B^{\pm}/B^{0}/B_{s}^{0}/b$-baryon ADMIXTURE BRANCHING RATIOS

$$Γ(B^+) / Γ_{\text{total}} \qquad Γ_1 / Γ$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.408 ± 0.007</td><td>OUR EVALUATION</td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.4099 ± 0.0082 ± 0.0111</td><td>1 ABDALLAH</td><td>03k</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The analysis is based on a neural network, to estimate the charge of the weakly-decaying b hadron by distinguishing its decay products from particles produced at the primary vertex.

$$Γ(B^+) / Γ(B^0) \qquad Γ_1 / Γ_2$$
$$1.054 ± 0.018^{+0.062}_{-0.074} \qquad AALTONEN 08N CDF p̄p at 1.96 TeV$$

$$Γ(B_s^0) / Γ(B^+) \qquad Γ_3 / Γ_1$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.121 ± 0.002 ± 0.005</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>20V</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.124 ± 0.002 ± 0.005</td><td>1,3 AAIJ</td><td>20V</td><td>LHCB pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.130 ± 0.002 ± 0.005</td><td>1,4,5 AAIJ</td><td>20V</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 AAIJ 20V measures the average value using the observed $B_s^0 \to J/ψφ$ and $B^+ \to J/ψK^+$ yields, over the ranges b-hadron $p_T$ of 0.5 and 40 GeV and $\eta$ of 2.0 and 6.5. The value is not used in averages as BR-related systematic uncertainties are not evaluated.
²AAIJ 20v reports $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_s^0)/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B^+)] \times [B(B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+)] = 0.1238 \pm 0.0010 \pm 0.0022$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi) = (1.04 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+) = (1.020 \pm 0.019) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

³AAIJ 20v reports $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_s^0)/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B^+)] \times [B(B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+)] = 0.1270 \pm 0.0007 \pm 0.0022$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi) = (1.04 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+) = (1.020 \pm 0.019) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

⁴AAIJ 20v reports the results in two different data sets, and we quote here the weighted average.

⁵AAIJ 20v reports $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_s^0)/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B^+)] \times [B(B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+)] = 0.1326 \pm 0.0007 \pm 0.0023$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B_s^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi) = (1.04 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+) = (1.020 \pm 0.019) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$\Gamma(B_s^0)/[\Gamma(B^+) + \Gamma(B^0)]$$

"OUR EVALUATION" is an average from Z decay.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.1230 ± 0.0115</td><td>OUR EVALUATION</td><td></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.122 ± 0.006</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AD LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.134 ± 0.004 <sup>+0.011</sup><sub>-0.010</sub></td><td>2</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12J LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.1265 ± 0.0085 ± 0.0131</td><td>3</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>11F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.128 <sup>+0.011</sup><sub>-0.010</sub> ± 0.011</td><td>4</td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>08N CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.213 ± 0.068</td><td>5</td><td>AFFOLDER</td><td>00E CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.21 ± 0.036 <sup>+0.038</sup><sub>-0.030</sub></td><td>6</td><td>ABE</td><td>99P CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 19AD measured the average value using b-hadron semileptonic decays and assuming isospin symmetry for b-hadron $p_T$ of 4 and 25 GeV and $\eta$ of 2 and 5.

²AAIJ 12J measured this value using b-hadron semileptonic decays and assuming isospin symmetry.

³AAIJ 11F measured $f_s/f_d = 0.253 \pm 0.017 \pm 0.017 \pm 0.020$, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and theoretical. We divide their value by 2. Our second error combines systematic and theoretical uncertainties.

⁴AAALTONEN 08N reports $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_s^0)/[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B^+) + \Gamma(\bar{b} \to B^0)]] \times [B(D_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+)] = (5.76 \pm 0.18^{+0.45}_{-0.42}) \times 10^{-3}$ which we divide by our best value $B(B_s^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵AFFOLDER 00E uses several electron-charm final states in $b \to c e^- X$.

⁶ABE 99p uses the numbers of $K^*(892)^0$, $K^*(892)^+$, and $\phi(1020)$ events produced in association with the double semileptonic decays $b \to c \mu^- X$ with $c \to s \mu^+ X$.

$$\Gamma(B_s^0)/\Gamma(B^0)$$

$$\Gamma_3/\Gamma_2$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.246 ± 0.023</td><td>OUR EVALUATION</td><td></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### 0.239 ± 0.016 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.240 ± 0.004 ± 0.020</td><td>1</td><td>AAD</td><td>15CMATLS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.238 ± 0.004 ± 0.026</td><td>2</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13P LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.2385 ± 0.0075</td><td>3</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.2539 ± 0.0079</td><td>3</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.2390 ± 0.0076</td><td>3</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAD 15CM measurement is derived from the observed $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ and $B_d^0 \to J/\psi K^0$ yields and a recent theory prediction of $B(B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi)/B(B_d^0 \to J/\psi K^0)$. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature systematic and theoretical uncertainties.

²AAIJ 13P studies also separately the $p_T(B)$ and $\eta(B)$ dependency of $\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B_s^0)/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B^0)$, finding $f_s/f_d(p_T) = (0.256 \pm 0.020) + (-2.0 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-3}/\text{GeV/c}(p_T - \langle p_T \rangle)$ and $f_s/f_d(\eta) = (0.256 \pm 0.020) + (0.005 \pm 0.006)(\eta - \langle \eta \rangle)$, where $\langle p_T \rangle = 10.4 \text{ GeV/c}$ and $\langle \eta \rangle = 3.28$. AAIJ 13p reports the measurement as $0.238 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.021$ where the last uncertainty is theoretical.

³AAIJ 21Y uses hadronic decays $B^0 \to D^-\pi^+$, $B^0 \to D^-K^+$, $B^0 \to D^-S^+\pi^+$ and $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ as well as semileptonic $B^0$ and $B_s^0$ decays. Measured within the $p_T$ range [0.5,40] GeV/c, $\eta$ range [2, 6.4].

$$\Gamma(B_c^+)/[\Gamma(B^+) + \Gamma(B^0)]$$

$$\Gamma_4/(\Gamma_1 + \Gamma_2)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 3.7 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.63 ± 0.08 ± 0.87</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AI LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.78 ± 0.04 ± 0.90</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AI LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured using $B_c^+$ semileptonic decays.

$$\Gamma(b\text{-baryon})/[\Gamma(B^+) + \Gamma(B^0)]$$

$$\Gamma_5/(\Gamma_1 + \Gamma_2)$$

"OUR EVALUATION" is an average from Z decay.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.103 ± 0.015</td><td>OUR EVALUATION</td><td></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### 0.103 ± 0.015 OUR EVALUATION

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.259 ± 0.018</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AD LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.305 ± 0.010 ± 0.081</td><td>2</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12J LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.31 ± 0.011 <sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.08</sub></td><td>3</td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>09E CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.23 ± 0.09 <sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.07</sub></td><td>4</td><td>AAALTONEN</td><td>08N CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.118 ± 0.042</td><td>3,5</td><td>AFFOLDER</td><td>00E CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 19AD measured the average value for $\Lambda_c^0$ using semileptonic decays and assuming isospin symmetry for b-hadron $p_T$ of 4 and 25 GeV and $\eta$ of 2 and 5.

²AAIJ 12J measured the ratio to be $(0.404 \pm 0.017 \pm 0.027 \pm 0.0105) \times [1 - (0.031 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.003)] \times p_T$ using b-hadron semileptonic decays where the $p_T$ is the momentum of charmed hadron-muon pair in GeV/c. We quote their weighted average value where the second error combines systematic and the error on $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)$.

³AAALTONEN 09E errata to the measurement reported in AFFOLDER 00E using the $p_T$ spectra from fully reconstructed $B^0$ and $\Lambda_b$ decays.

⁴AAALTONEN 08N reports $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to b\text{-baryon})/[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to B^+) + \Gamma(\bar{b} \to B^0)]] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)] = (14.1 \pm 0.6^{+5.3}_{-4.4}) \times 10^{-3}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵AFFOLDER 00E uses several electron-charm final states in $b \to c e^- X$.

$$\Gamma(\nu\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$$\Gamma_6/\Gamma$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.2308 ± 0.0077 ± 0.0124</td><td>1,2</td><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>96C L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ACCIARRI 96c assumes relative b semileptonic decay rates $e:\mu:\tau$ of 1:1:0.25. Based on missing-energy spectrum.

²Assumes Standard Model value for $R_B$.

$$\Gamma(\ell^+ \nu \text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$$\Gamma_7/\Gamma$$

"OUR EVALUATION" is an average of the data listed below, excluding all asymmetry measurements, performed by the LEP Electroweak Working Group as described in the "Note on the Z boson" in the Z Particle Listings.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 0.1069 ± 0.0022 OUR EVALUATION

### 0.1064 ± 0.0016 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.1070 ± 0.0010 ± 0.0035</td><td>1</td><td>HEISTER</td><td>02G AEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.1070 ± 0.0008 <sup>+0.0037</sup><sub>-0.0049</sub></td><td>2</td><td>ABREU</td><td>01L DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.1083 ± 0.0010 <sup>+0.0028</sup><sub>-0.0024</sub></td><td>3</td><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>00E OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.1016 ± 0.0013 ± 0.0030</td><td>4</td><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>00 L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.1085 ± 0.0012 ± 0.0047</td><td>5,6</td><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>96C L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.1106 ± 0.0039 ± 0.0022</td><td>7</td><td>ABREU</td><td>95D DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.114 ± 0.003 ± 0.004</td><td>8</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>94G AEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.100 ± 0.007 ± 0.007</td><td>9</td><td>ABREU</td><td>93C DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.105 ± 0.006 ± 0.005</td><td>10</td><td>AKERS</td><td>93B OPAL</td><td>Repl. by ABBI-ENDI 00E</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses the combination of lepton transverse momentum spectrum and the correlation between the charge of the lepton and opposite jet charge. The first error is statistic and the second error is the total systematic error including the modeling.

²The experimental systematic and model uncertainties are combined in quadrature.

³ABBIENDI 00E result is determined by comparing the distribution of several kinematic variables of leptonic events in a lifetime tagged $Z \to b\bar{b}$ sample using artificial neural network techniques. The first error is statistic; the second error is the total systematic error.

⁴ACCIARRI 00 result obtained from a combined fit of $R_B = \Gamma(Z \to b\bar{b})/\Gamma(Z \to \text{hadrons})$ and $B(b \to \ell\nu X)$, using double-tagging method.

⁵ACCIARRI 96c result obtained by a fit to the single lepton spectrum.

⁶Assumes Standard Model value for $R_B$.

⁷ABREU 95d give systematic errors ±0.0019 (model) and 0.0012 ($R_C$). We combine these in quadrature.

⁸BUSKULIC 94g uses $e$ and $\mu$ events. This value is from a global fit to the lepton $p$ and $p_T$ (relative to jet) spectra which also determines the $b$ and $c$ production fractions, the fragmentation functions, and the forward-backward asymmetries. This branching ratio depends primarily on the ratio of dileptons to single leptons at high $p_T$, but the lower $p_T$ portion of the lepton spectrum is included in the global fit to reduce the model dependence. The model dependence is ±0.0026 and is included in the systematic error.

⁹ABREU 93C event count includes $ee$ events. Combining $e\nu$, $\mu\nu$, and $e\mu$ events, they obtain 0.100 ± 0.007 ± 0.007.

¹⁰AKERS 93B analysis performed using single and dilepton events.

$$\Gamma(e^+ \nu_e \text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$$\Gamma_8/\Gamma$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 0.1086 ± 0.0035 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.1078 ± 0.0008 <sup>+0.0050</sup><sub>-0.0046</sub></td><td>1</td><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>00E OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.1089 ± 0.0020 ± 0.0051</td><td>2,3</td><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>96C L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.107 ± 0.015 ± 0.007</td><td>260</td><td>ABREU</td><td>93C DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.138 ± 0.032 ± 0.008</td><td>5</td><td>ADEVA</td><td>91C L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.086 ± 0.027 ± 0.008</td><td>6</td><td>ABE</td><td>93E VNS</td><td>E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 58 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.109 <sup>+0.014</sup><sub>-0.013</sub> ± 0.0055</td><td>2719</td><td>7 AKERS</td><td>93B OPAL</td><td>Repl. by ABBI-ENDI 00E</td></tr><tr><td>0.111 ± 0.028 ± 0.026</td><td></td><td>BEHREND</td><td>90D CELL</td><td>E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 43 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.150 ± 0.011 ± 0.022</td><td></td><td>BEHREND</td><td>90D CELL</td><td>E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 35 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.112 ± 0.009 ± 0.011</td><td></td><td>ONG</td><td>88 MRK2</td><td>E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 29 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>
$$ \Gamma(\tau^{+} \nu_{\tau} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{25}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

2.41±0.23 OUR AVERAGE

2.78±0.18±0.51

2.43±0.20±0.25

2.19±0.24±0.39

1.7 ±0.5 ±1.1

2.4 ±0.7 ±0.8

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 ABBIENDI 01Q OPAL $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

2 BARATE 01E ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

3 ABREU 00C DLPH $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

4,5 ACCIARRI 96C L3 $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

6 ACCIARRI 94C L3 $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

2.75±0.30±0.37

4.08±0.76±0.62

7 BUSKULIC 95 ALEP Repl. by BARATE 01E

BUSKULIC 93B ALEP Repl. by BUSKULIC 95

1 ABBIENDI 01Q uses a missing energy technique.

2 The energy-flow and b-tagging algorithms were used.

3 Uses the missing energy in $Z \to b\bar{b}$ decays without identifying leptons.

4 ACCIARRI 96C result obtained from missing energy spectrum.

5 Assumes Standard Model value for $R_B$.

6 This is a direct result using tagged $b\bar{b}$ events at the $Z$, but species are not separated.

7 BUSKULIC 95 uses missing-energy technique.

$$ \Gamma(D^{*+} \tau \nu_{\tau} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{26}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

(0.88±0.31±0.28) × $10^{-2}$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BARATE 01E ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The energy-flow and b-tagging algorithms were used.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{b} \to \tau \to \ell^{-} \bar{\nu}_{\ell} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{27}/\Gamma $$

“OUR EVALUATION” is an average of the data listed below, excluding all asymmetry measurements, performed by the LEP Electroweak Working Group as described in the “Note on the Z boson” in the Z Particle Listings.

VALUE

0.0802±0.0019 OUR EVALUATION

0.0817±0.0020 OUR AVERAGE

0.0818±0.0015

+0.0024

-0.0026

0.0798±0.0022

+0.0025

-0.0029

0.0840±0.0016

+0.0039

-0.0036

1 HEISTER 02G ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

2 ABREU 01L DLPH $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

3 ABBIENDI 00E OPAL $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

4 ABREU 00E OPAL $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.0770±0.0097±0.0046

0.082 ±0.003 ±0.012

0.077 ±0.004 ±0.007

4 ABREU 95D DLPH $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

5 BUSKULIC 94G ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

6 AKERS 93B ALEP Repl. by ABBIENDI 00E

1 Uses the combination of lepton transverse momentum spectrum and the correlation between the charge of the lepton and opposite jet charge. The first error is statistic and the second error is the total systematic error including the modeling.

2 The experimental systematic and model uncertainties are combined in quadrature.

3 ABBIENDI 00E result is determined by comparing the distribution of several kinematic variables of leptonic events in a lifetime tagged $Z \to b\bar{b}$ sample using artificial neural network techniques. The first error is statistic; the second error is the total systematic error.

4 ABREU 95D give systematic errors ±0.0033 (model) and 0.0032 ($R_C$). We combine these in quadrature. This result is from the same global fit as their $\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} X)$ data.

5 BUSKULIC 94G uses $e$ and $\mu$ events. This value is from the same global fit as their $\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ data.

6 AKERS 93B analysis performed using single and dilepton events.

$$ \Gamma(c \to \ell^{+} \nu \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{28}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.0161±0.0020

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 ABREU 01L DLPH $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The experimental systematic and model uncertainties are combined in quadrature.

$$ \Gamma(D^{0} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{29}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.587±0.028±0.004

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BUSKULIC 96Y ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 BUSKULIC 96Y reports $0.605 \pm 0.024 \pm 0.016$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to D^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) = 0.0383$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) = (3.947 \pm 0.030) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D^{0} D_{s}^{\pm} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{30}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.091±0.020+0.034

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The systematic error includes the uncertainties due to the charm branching ratios.

$$ \Gamma(D^{\mp} D_{s}^{\pm} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{31}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.040±0.017+0.016

1 BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The systematic error includes the uncertainties due to the charm branching ratios.

$$ [\Gamma(D^{0} D_{s}^{\pm} \text{ anything}) + \Gamma(D^{\mp} D_{s}^{\pm} \text{ anything})]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad (\Gamma_{30}+\Gamma_{31})/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.131±0.026+0.048

-0.022-0.031

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The systematic error includes the uncertainties due to the charm branching ratios.

$$ \Gamma(D^{0} D^{0} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{32}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.051±0.016+0.012

-0.014-0.011

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The systematic error includes the uncertainties due to the charm branching ratios.

$$ \Gamma(D^{0} D^{\pm} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{33}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.027±0.015+0.010

-0.013-0.009

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The systematic error includes the uncertainties due to the charm branching ratios.

$$ [\Gamma(D^{0} D^{0} \text{ anything}) + \Gamma(D^{0} D^{\pm} \text{ anything})]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad (\Gamma_{32}+\Gamma_{33})/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.078±0.020+0.018

-0.018-0.016

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The systematic error includes the uncertainties due to the charm branching ratios.

$$ \Gamma(D^{\pm} D^{\mp} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{34}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

<0.009

CL%

BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

$$ [\Gamma(D^{0} \text{ anything}) + \Gamma(D^{+} \text{ anything})]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad (\Gamma_{35}+\Gamma_{36})/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.093±0.017+0.014

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 ABDALLAH 03E DLPH $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The second error is the total of systematic uncertainties including the branching fractions used in the measurement.

$$ \Gamma(D^{-} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{37}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.227±0.016±0.004

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BUSKULIC 96Y ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 BUSKULIC 96Y reports $0.234 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.010$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to D^{-} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^{+} \to K^{-} 2\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D^{+} \to K^{-} 2\pi^{+}) = 0.091$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^{+} \to K^{-} 2\pi^{+}) = (9.38 \pm 0.16) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D^{*}(2010)^{+} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{38}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.173±0.016+0.012

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 ACKERSTAFF 98E OPAL $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 Uses lepton tags to select $Z \to b\bar{b}$ events.

$$ \Gamma(D_{1}(2420)^{0} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{39}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.050±0.014+0.006

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 ACKERSTAFF 97W OPAL $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 ACKERSTAFF 97W assumes $B(D^{*2}(2460)^0 \to D^{*+} \pi^{-}) = 0.21 \pm 0.04$ and $\Gamma_{b\bar{b}}/\Gamma_{\text{hadrons}} = 0.216$ at Z decay.

$$ \Gamma(D^{*}(2010)^{\mp} D_{s}^{\pm} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{40}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.033±0.010+0.012

-0.009-0.009

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The systematic error includes the uncertainties due to the charm branching ratios.

$$ \Gamma(D^{0} D^{*}(2010)^{\pm} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{41}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.030±0.009+0.007

-0.008-0.005

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The systematic error includes the uncertainties due to the charm branching ratios.

$$ \Gamma(D^{*}(2010)^{\pm} D^{\mp} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{42}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.025±0.010+0.006

-0.009-0.005

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The systematic error includes the uncertainties due to the charm branching ratios.

$$ \Gamma(D^{*}(2010)^{\pm} D^{*}(2010)^{\mp} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{43}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.012±0.004+0.002

-0.003-0.005

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 BARATE 98Q ALEP $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 The systematic error includes the uncertainties due to the charm branching ratios.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{b}D\text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{44}/\Gamma $$

VALUE

0.10±0.032+0.107

-0.095

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 ABBIENDI 04I OPAL $e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$

1 Measurement performed using an inclusive identification of B mesons and the D candidates.