⁴ Uses $B^0 \to \psi(2S) K_S^0$ decays.

⁵ Uses $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ decays.

⁶ Measurement based on $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$, $B^0 \to \psi(2S) K_S^0$ with $J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-$, $J/\psi \to e^+e^-$ and $\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$.⁷

⁷ AAIJ 24 provides the correlation coefficient $\rho = 0.441$ between the uncertainties of $C_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ and $S_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ measurements.

⁸ Measurement based on $B^0 \to \psi(2S) K_S^0$ with $\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$.⁹

⁹ Measurement based on $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ with $J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-$ and $J/\psi \to e^+e^-$.¹⁰

¹⁰ AAIJ 17BN provides the correlation coefficient $\rho = 0.42$ between the uncertainties of $S_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ and $C_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ measurements.

¹¹ AAIJ 15N uses 41,560 flavor-tagged $B_d \to J/\psi K_S^0$ events from 3 fb⁻¹ of integrated luminosity. Provides the correlation coefficient $\rho = 0.483$ between the statistical uncertainties of and measurements.

¹² AAIJ 13k uses 8200 flavor-tagged $B_d \to J/\psi K_S^0$ events from 1 fb⁻¹ of integrated luminosity. Provides the correlation coefficient $\rho = 0.42$ between the statistical uncertainties of $S_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ and $C_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ measurements.

### $S_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

0.701±0.017 OUR EVALUATION
0.708±0.016 OUR AVERAGE

$0.724 \pm 0.014$

$0.670 \pm 0.029 \pm 0.013$

$0.738 \pm 0.079 \pm 0.036$

$0.642 \pm 0.047 \pm 0.021$

$0.57 \pm 0.58 \pm 0.06$

$0.897 \pm 0.100 \pm 0.036$

$0.666 \pm 0.031 \pm 0.013$

$0.79 \pm 0.41$

$0.84 \pm 0.82$

$0.79 \pm 0.44$

$0.84 \pm 0.10$

$0.72 \pm 0.18$

$0.717 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.008$

$0.649 \pm 0.053 \pm 0.018$

$0.722 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.007$

$0.760 \pm 0.034$

$0.75 \pm 0.04$

$0.84 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.01$

$0.731 \pm 0.035 \pm 0.020$

$0.73 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.04$

$0.650 \pm 0.029 \pm 0.018$

$0.72 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.03$

$0.642 \pm 0.031 \pm 0.017$

$1$ AAIJ $24$ LHCB $pp$ at 7, 8 and 13 TeV

$2$ ADACHI $12A$ BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$3$ ADACHI $12A$ BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$4$ ADACHI $12A$ BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$5$ SATO $12$ BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(5S)$

$3$ AUBERT $09K$ BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$AUBERT$ $09K$ BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$6$ AFFOLDER $00C$ CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.8 TeV

$7$ BARATE $00Q$ ALEP $e^+e^- \to Z$

$8$ ACKERSTAFF $98Z$ OPAL $e^+e^- \to Z$

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$9,10$ AAIJ $24$ LHCB $pp$ at 13 TeV

$11$ AAIJ $24$ LHCB $pp$ at 13 TeV

$12$ AAIJ $24$ LHCB $pp$ at 13 TeV

$9,13$ AAIJ $17BN$ LHCB $pp$ at 7, 8 TeV

$12$ AAIJ $17BN$ LHCB $pp$ at 7, 8 TeV

$11$ AAIJ $17BN$ LHCB $pp$ at 7, 8 TeV

$14$ AAIJ $15N$ LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 17BN

$15$ AAIJ $13K$ LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15N

$16$ SAHOO $08$ BELL Repl. by ADACHI 12A

$3$ SAHOO $08$ BELL Repl. by ADACHI 12A

$07$ BELL Repl. by ADACHI 12A

¹ A combination of this Run 2 result with the Run 1 result from AAIJ 17BN is reported with a correlation coefficient of 0.40.

² Uses $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ decays.

³ Based on $B^0 \to \psi(2S) K_S^0$ decays.

⁴ Uses $B^0 \to J/\psi K_L^0$ decays.

⁵ SATO 12 uses 121 fb⁻¹ data collected at $\Upsilon(5S)$ resonance. Uses the "B-π tagging" where $B\pi^+$ and $B\pi^-$ tagged $J/\psi K_S^0$ events are compared.

⁶ AFFOLDER $00C$ uses about 400 $B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K_S^0$ events. The production flavor of $B^0$ was determined using three tagging algorithms: a same-side tag, a jet-charge tag, and a soft-lepton tag.

⁷ BARATE $00Q$ uses 23 candidates for $B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K_S^0$ decays. A combination of jet-charge, vertex-charge, and same-side tagging techniques were used to determine the $B^0$ production flavor.

⁸ ACKERSTAFF 98z uses 24 candidates for $B_d^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K_S^0$ decay. A combination of jet-charge and vertex-charge techniques were used to tag the $B_d^0$ production flavor.

⁹ Measurement based on $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$, $B^0 \to \psi(2S) K_S^0$ with $J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-$, $J/\psi \to e^+e^-$ and $\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$.¹⁰

¹⁰ AAIJ 24 provides the correlation coefficient $\rho = 0.441$ between the uncertainties of $C_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ and $S_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ measurements.

¹¹ Measurement based on $B^0 \to \psi(2S) K_S^0$ with $\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$.¹²

¹² Measurement based on $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ with $J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-$ and $J/\psi \to e^+e^-$.¹³

¹³ AAIJ 17BN provides the correlation coefficient $\rho = 0.42$ between the uncertainties of $S_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ and $C_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ measurements.

¹⁴ AAIJ 15N uses 41,560 flavor-tagged $B_d \to J/\psi K_S^0$ events from 3 fb⁻¹ of integrated luminosity. Provides the correlation coefficient $\rho = 0.483$ between the statistical uncertainties of and measurements.

¹⁵ AAIJ 13k uses 8200 flavor-tagged $B_d \to J/\psi K_S^0$ events from 1 fb⁻¹ of integrated luminosity. Provides the correlation coefficient $\rho = 0.42$ between the statistical uncertainties of $S_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ and $C_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$ measurements.

¹⁶ Combined result of CHEN 07 and SAHOO 08.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.708±0.016 (Error scaled by 1.4)

<figure><img src="image_617.png" /></figure>

$S_{J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0)} (B^0 \to J/\psi(\psi(nS)K^0))$

### $C_{J/\psi K^0} (B^0 \to J/\psi K^{*0})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.025±0.083±0.054</strong></td><td><strong>1</strong> AUBERT<br><strong>09K</strong> BABR<br><strong>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → <span style="text-decoration: overline;">T</span>(4S)</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Based on $B^0 \to J/\psi K^{*0}$, $K^{*0} \to K_S^0 \pi^0$.

### $S_{J/\psi K^0} (B^0 \to J/\psi K^{*0})$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.601±0.239±0.087</strong></td><td><strong>1,2</strong> AUBERT<br><strong>09K</strong> BABR<br><strong>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → <span style="text-decoration: overline;">T</span>(4S)</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Based on $B^0 \to J/\psi K^{*0}$, $K^{*0} \to K_S^0 \pi^0$.

² This $S_{J/\psi K^{*0}}$ value has been corrected for the dilution of the $\sin(\Delta M \Delta t)$ coefficient of the CP asymmetry by a factor of $1-R_\perp$, which arises from the mixture of CP-even and CP-odd B decay amplitudes.

### $C_{\chi_{c0} K_S^0} (B^0 \to \chi_{c0} K_S^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.29±0.53</strong></td><td><strong>-0.44</strong> AUBERT<br><strong>09AU</strong> BABR<br><strong>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → <span style="text-decoration: overline;">T</span>(4S)</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K^0 \pi^+\pi^-$ decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

### $S_{\chi_{c0} K_S^0} (B^0 \to \chi_{c0} K_S^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.69±0.52±0.08</strong></td><td><strong>1</strong> AUBERT<br><strong>09AU</strong> BABR<br><strong>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → <span style="text-decoration: overline;">T</span>(4S)</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K^0 \pi^+\pi^-$ decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

### $C_{\chi_{c1} K_S^0} (B^0 \to \chi_{c1} K_S^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.06±0.07</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$0.017 \pm 0.083 \pm 0.026$

$-0.04 \pm 0.046$

$$ \text{ADACHI} \quad 12A \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) $$

$$ \text{AUBERT} \quad 09K \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) $$

### $S_{\chi_{c1} K_S^0} (B^0 \to \chi_{c1} K_S^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.63±0.10</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$0.640 \pm 0.117 \pm 0.040$

$0.614 \pm 0.160 \pm 0.040$

$$ \text{ADACHI} \quad 12A \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) $$

$$ \text{AUBERT} \quad 09K \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) $$

### $\sin(2\beta_{eff})(B^0 \to \phi K_S^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.22±0.27±0.12</strong></td><td><strong>1</strong> AUBERT<br><strong>07AX</strong> BABR<br><strong>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → <span style="text-decoration: overline;">T</span>(4S)</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$0.50 \pm 0.25 \pm 0.07$

$-0.04 \pm 0.04$

$$ \text{1 AUBERT} \quad \text{05T} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 07AX} $$

¹ Obtained by constraining $C = 0$.

### $\sin(2\beta_{eff})(B^0 \to \phi K_S^0(1430)^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.97±0.03</strong></td><td><strong>-0.52</strong> AUBERT<br><strong>08BG</strong> BABR<br><strong>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → <span style="text-decoration: overline;">T</span>(4S)</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured using the CP-violation phase difference $\Delta\phi_{00}$ between the B and $\bar{B}$ decay amplitude.

### $\sin(2\beta_{eff})(B^0 \to K^+ K^- K_S^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.77±0.11</strong></td><td><strong>+0.07</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>-0.04</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$0.55 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.12$

¹ Obtained by constraining $C = 0$.

$$ \text{1 AUBERT} \quad \text{05T} \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 07AX} $$
$\sin(2\beta_{\text{eff}})(B^0 \to [K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-]_{D(\ell)} h^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.80±0.14±0.07</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>18</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.43±0.27±0.08</td><td>2 VOROBYEV</td><td>16</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.29±0.34±0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.78±0.44±0.22</td><td>KROKOVNY</td><td>06</td><td>BELL Repl. by VOROBYEV 16</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Analyzes joint data sample of Belle and BaBar using Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$; the second error combines experimental systematic uncertainty and the Dalitz plot model uncertainty.

²A model-independent measurement uses the binned Dalitz plot technique.

$\beta_{\text{eff}}(B^0 \to [K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-]_{D(\ell)} h^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (°)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>22.5±4.4±1.3</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>18</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>11.7±7.8±2.1</td><td>2 VOROBYEV</td><td>16</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Analyzes joint data sample of Belle and BaBar using Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$; the second error combines experimental systematic uncertainty and the Dalitz plot model uncertainty.

²A model-independent measurement uses the binned Dalitz plot technique.

$2\beta_{\text{eff}}(B^0 \to J/\psi \rho^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (°)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>41.7±9.6<sup>+2.8</sup><sub>-6.3</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$|\lambda|(B^0 \to [K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-]_{D(\ell)} h^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.01±0.08±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$|\sin(2\beta + \gamma)|$

$\beta(\phi_1)$ and $\gamma(\phi_3)$ are angles of CKM unitarity triangle, see the review on “CP Violation” in the Reviews section.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>>0.40</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>06Y</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>>0.77</td><td>68</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>18Z</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>>0.13</td><td>95</td><td>3 RONGA</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>>0.07</td><td>95</td><td>3 RONGA</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>>0.35</td><td>95</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>05Z</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>>0.69</td><td>68</td><td>5 AUBERT</td><td>04V</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>>0.58</td><td>95</td><td>6 AUBERT</td><td>04W</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses fully reconstructed $B^0 \to D^*(\pm)\pi^\pm$ and $D^\pm\pi^\mp$ decays and some theoretical assumptions.

²Uses a time dependent CP violation measurement in $B^0 \to D^\mp\pi^\pm$ decays with external input and some theoretical assumptions.

³Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed $D^*(\pm)\pi$ events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.

⁴Uses partially reconstructed $B^0 \to D^\pm\pi^\pm$ decays and some theoretical assumptions.

⁵Uses fully reconstructed $B^0 \to D^*(\pm)\pi^\mp$ decays and some theoretical assumptions, such as the SU(3) symmetry relation.

⁶Combining this measurement with the results from AUBERT 04V for fully reconstructed $B^0 \to D^*(\pm)\pi^\mp$ and some theoretical assumptions, such as the SU(3) symmetry relation.

$2\beta + \gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (°)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>83±53±20</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AC</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Used a time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis of $B^0 \to D^\mp K_0^0 \pi^\pm$ assuming the ratio of the $b \to u$ and $b \to c$ decay amplitudes to be 0.3.

$\alpha$

For angle $\alpha(\phi_2)$ of the CKM unitarity triangle, see the review on “CP violation” in the reviews section.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (°)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$84.1^+ \frac{4.5}{-3.8}$

OUR EVALUATION (Produced by HFLAV)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>93.7±10.6</td><td>1 VANHOEFER</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>84.9±13.5</td><td>1 VANHOEFER</td><td>14</td><td>BELL Repl. by VANHOEFER 16</td></tr><tr><td>79 ± 7 ±11</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>10D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>92.4<sup>+6.0</sup><sub>-6.5</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>78.6 ± 7.3</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>07O</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>88 ±17</td><td>4 SOMOV</td><td>06</td><td>BELL Repl. by VANHOEFER 14</td></tr><tr><td>100 ±13</td><td>5 AUBERT,B</td><td>05C</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09G</td></tr><tr><td>102<sup>+16</sup><sub>-12</sub> ±14</td><td>6 AUBERT,B</td><td>04R</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 05C</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Based on an isospin analysis of the $B \to \rho\rho$ system.

²Obtained using the time dependent analysis of $B^0 \to a_1(1260)\pm\pi^\mp$ and branching fraction measurements of $B \to a_1(1260)K$ and $B \to K_1\pi$. Uses SU(3) flavor sections.

³The angle $\alpha_{\text{eff}}$ is obtained using the measured CP parameters of $B^0 \to a_1(1260)\pm\pi^\mp$ and choosing one of the four solutions that is compatible with the result of SM-based fits.

⁴Obtained using isospin relation and selecting a solution closest to the CKM best fit average; the 90% CL allowed interval is 59° < $\phi_2$ ($\equiv \alpha$) < 115°.
⁵Obtained using isospin relation and selecting a solution closest to the CKM best fit average; 90% CL allowed interval is 79° < $\alpha$ < 123°.

⁶Obtained from the measured CP parameters of the longitudinal polarization by selecting the solution closest to the CKM best fit central value of $\alpha = 95° - 98°$.

CP VIOLATION PARAMETERS IN $B^0 \to D^0 K^*0$ DECAY

The parameters $r_{B^0}$ and $\delta_{B^0}$ are the magnitude ratio and strong phase difference between the amplitudes of $A(B^0 \to D^0 K^*)$ and $A(B^0 \to D^0 K^*)$.
The measured observables and are defined as $x_\pm = r_{B^0} \cos(\delta_{B^0} \pm \gamma)$ and $y_\pm = r_{B^0} \sin(\delta_{B^0} \pm \gamma)$ where $\gamma$ is the CKM angle $\gamma$.

"OUR EVALUATION" is provided by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV). The CKM angle $\gamma$ is listed in the $B^+$ section for "CP VIOLATION PARAMETERS IN $B^+ \to DK^+$ AND SIMILAR DECAYS."

$x_+(B^0 \to DK^*)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$0.04\pm0.17$ OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.04±0.16±0.11</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.05±0.35±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.05±0.24±0.04</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>16AA</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot of $B^0 \to DK^+\pi^-$ with $D \to K^+K^-$, $\pi^+\pi^-$, or $K^+\pi^-$.

²Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-$ decays coming from $B^0 \to DK^*(892)^0$ modes.

$x_-(B^0 \to DK^*)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$-0.16\pm0.14$ OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.02±0.13±0.14</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.31±0.20±0.04</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16Z</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.15±0.14±0.03</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>16AA</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot of $B^0 \to DK^+\pi^-$ with $D \to K^+K^-$, $\pi^+\pi^-$, or $K^+\pi^-$.

²Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-$ decays coming from $B^0 \to DK^*(892)^0$ modes.

$y_+(B^0 \to DK^*)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$-0.68\pm0.22$ OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.47±0.28±0.22</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.81±0.28±0.06</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16Z</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.65<sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.23</sub>±0.08</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>16AA</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot of $B^0 \to DK^+\pi^-$ with $D \to K^+K^-$, $\pi^+\pi^-$, or $K^+\pi^-$.

²Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-$ decays coming from $B^0 \to DK^*(892)^0$ modes.

$y_-(B^0 \to DK^*)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$0.20\pm0.25$ OUR AVERAGE

Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.35±0.26±0.41</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16s</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.31±0.21±0.05</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16Z</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.25±0.15±0.06</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>16AA</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot of $B^0 \to DK^+\pi^-$ with $D \to K^+K^-$, $\pi^+\pi^-$, or $K^+\pi^-$.

²Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-$ decays coming from $B^0 \to DK^*(892)^0$ modes.

$r_{B^0}(B^0 \to DK^*)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$0.257^{+0.021}_{-0.023}$ OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.39 ±0.13</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16AA</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.56 ±0.17</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>16Z</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^0 \pi^+\pi^-$ decays coming from $B^0 \to DK^*(892)^0$ modes.

²Measurement is performed with $K^+\pi^-$ masses within 50 MeV of the $K^*0$ mass and an absolute value of the cosine of the $K^*0$ helicity angle greater than 0.4. Angle $\gamma$ is required to satisfy $0° < \gamma < 180°$ degrees.

$\delta_{B^0}(B^0 \to DK^*)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (°)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$194.1^{+9.6}_{-8.8}$ OUR EVALUATION

(Produced by HFLAV)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>197<sup>+24</sup><sub>-20</sub></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16AA</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>204<sup>+21</sup><sub>-20</sub></td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>16Z</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>
¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $D \to K_S^+\pi^-\pi^-$ decays coming from $B^0 \to DK^*(892)^0$ modes.

² Measurement is performed with $K^+\pi^-$ masses within 50 MeV of the $K^*0$ mass and an absolute value of the cosine of the $K^*0$ helicity angle greater than 0.4. Angle $\gamma$ is required to satisfy $0 < \gamma < 180$ degrees.

### $a_{CP}(B^0 \to p\bar{p}K^+\pi^-)$

Observable $a_{CP}(B^0 \to p\bar{p}K^+\pi^-)$ calculated as half of the difference between triple products for $B^0$ and $\bar{B}^0$, which is sensitive to CP violation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.51 ± 0.85 ± 0.08</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AG LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Phase-space integrated asymmetry.

### $a_P(B^0 \to p\bar{p}K^+\pi^-)$

Observable $a_P(B^0 \to p\bar{p}K^+\pi^-)$ calculated as the average of the triple products for $B^0$ and $\bar{B}^0$, which is sensitive to parity violation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.49 ± 0.85 ± 0.08</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AG LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Phase-space integrated asymmetry.

## T and CPT VIOLATION PARAMETERS

Measured values of the $T$, $CP$, and $CPT$-asymmetry parameters, defined as the differences in $S_{\alpha,\beta}^{\pm}$ and $C_{\alpha,\beta}^{\pm}$ between symmetry-transformed transitions. The indices $\alpha = \ell^+, \ell^-$ and $\beta = K_S^0, K_L^0$ stand for reconstructed the flavor final state and the CP final states from $T(4S)$ decay. The sign $\pm$ indicates whether the decay to the flavor final state $\alpha$ occurs before or after the decay to the CP final state.

Alternatively, violations of CPT symmetry and Lorentz invariance are searched for by studying interference effects in $B^0$ mixing. Results are expressed in terms of the standard model extension parameter $\Delta a$, which describes the difference between the couplings of the valence quarks within $B^0$ meson with the Lorentz-violating fields.

### $\Delta S_T^+(S_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^- - S_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-1.37 ± 0.14 ± 0.06</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta S_T^-(S_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^+ - S_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.17 ± 0.18 ± 0.11</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta C_T^+(C_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^- - C_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.10 ± 0.14 ± 0.08</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta C_T^-(C_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^+ - C_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.04 ± 0.14 ± 0.08</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta S_{CP}^+(S_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^+ - S_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-1.30 ± 0.11 ± 0.07</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta S_{CP}^-(S_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^- - S_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.33 ± 0.12 ± 0.06</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta C_{CP}^+(C_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^+ - C_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.07 ± 0.09 ± 0.03</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta C_{CP}^-(C_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^- - C_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.08 ± 0.10 ± 0.04</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta S_{CPT}^+(S_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^- - S_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.16 ± 0.21 ± 0.09</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta S_{CPT}^-(S_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^+ - S_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.03 ± 0.13 ± 0.06</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta C_{CPT}^+(C_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^- - C_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.14 ± 0.15 ± 0.07</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta C_{CPT}^-(C_{\ell^+, K_S^0}^+ - C_{\ell^-, K_S^0}^+)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.03 ± 0.12 ± 0.08</td><td>LEES</td><td>12W</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Delta a_{\parallel}$ CPT parameter in $B^0$ mixing

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-15</sup> GeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.10 ± 0.82 ± 0.54</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16E</td><td>LHCB $pp \ at \ 7, 8$ TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ decays.

### $\Delta a_{\perp}$ CPT parameter in $B^0$ mixing

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-13</sup> GeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.20 ± 0.22 ± 0.04</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16E</td><td>LHCB $pp \ at \ 7, 8$ TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ decays.

### $\Delta a_{\chi}$ CPT parameter in $B^0$ mixing

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-15</sup> GeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>+1.97 ± 1.30 ± 0.29</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16E</td><td>LHCB $pp \ at \ 7, 8$ TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ decays.

### $\Delta a_{\gamma}$ CPT parameter in $B^0$ mixing

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-15</sup> GeV)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>+0.44 ± 1.26 ± 0.29</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16E</td><td>LHCB $pp \ at \ 7, 8$ TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$ decays.

## $B^0 \to D^*\ell^+\nu_\ell$ FORM FACTORS

$R_1$ (form factor ratio ~ $V/A_1$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.239 ± 0.029</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.229 ± 0.028 ± 0.009</td><td>1 WAHEED</td><td>19</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>1.56 ± 0.07 ± 0.15</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09A</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>1.18 ± 0.30 ± 0.12</td><td>DUBOSCQ</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.401 ± 0.034 ± 0.018</td><td>1 DUNGEL</td><td>10</td><td>BELL Repl. by WAHEED 19</td></tr><tr><td>1.429 ± 0.061 ± 0.044</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08R</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09A</td></tr><tr><td>1.396 ± 0.060 ± 0.044</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06Z</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08R</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses fully reconstructed $D^*\ell^+\nu$ events ($\ell = e$ or $\mu$).

$R_2$ (form factor ratio ~ $A_2/A_1$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.84 ± 0.04</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.8.</td></tr><tr><td>0.852 ± 0.021 ± 0.006</td><td>1 WAHEED</td><td>19</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>0.66 ± 0.05 ± 0.09</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09A</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>0.71 ± 0.22 ± 0.07</td><td>DUBOSCQ</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.864 ± 0.024 ± 0.008</td><td>1 DUNGEL</td><td>10</td><td>BELL Repl. by WAHEED 19</td></tr><tr><td>0.827 ± 0.038 ± 0.022</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08R</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09A</td></tr><tr><td>0.885 ± 0.040 ± 0.026</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06Z</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08R</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses fully reconstructed $D^*\ell^+\nu$ events ($\ell = e$ or $\mu$).

$\rho_{A_1}^2$ (form factor slope)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.12 ± 0.04</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5.</td></tr><tr><td>1.106 ± 0.031 ± 0.007</td><td>1 WAHEED</td><td>19</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>1.22 ± 0.02 ± 0.07</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09A</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>0.91 ± 0.15 ± 0.06</td><td>DUBOSCQ</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.214 ± 0.034 ± 0.009</td><td>1 DUNGEL</td><td>10</td><td>BELL Repl. by WAHEED 19</td></tr><tr><td>1.191 ± 0.048 ± 0.028</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08R</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09A</td></tr><tr><td>1.145 ± 0.059 ± 0.046</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06Z</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08R</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses fully reconstructed $D^*\ell^+\nu$ events ($\ell = e$ or $\mu$).

## PARTIAL BRANCHING FRACTIONS IN $B^0 \to K^*(\ell^+)\ell^-$

### $B(\bar{B}^0 \to K^*\ell^+e^-)$ ($0.0009 < q^2 < 1.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.1<sup>+0.9+0.2</sup><sub>-0.8-0.3</sub> ± 0.2</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13U</td><td>LHCB $pp \ at \ 7$ TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The last uncertainty is due to uncertainties of $B(\bar{B}^0 \to J/\psi K^*)$ and $B(J/\psi \to e^+e^-)$ branching fraction measurements.

### $B(\bar{B}^0 \to K^*\ell^+\ell^-)$ ($0.1 < q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

¹ $1.24^{+0.23}_{-0.27}$ OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.14 ± 0.11<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.15</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y</td><td>LHCB $pp \ at \ 7$ TeV, $K^*\ell^+\mu^-$</td></tr><tr><td>1.80 ± 0.36 ± 0.11</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI</td><td>CDF $p\bar{p} \ at \ 1.96$ TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.48<sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.12</sub> ± 0.04</td><td>1 CHATRCHYAN 13BL CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ CHATRCHYAN 13BL uses, for this bin, $1.0 < q^2 < 2.0 \text{ GeV}^2/c^4$.
B(B⁰ → K*⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (2.0 < q² < 4.3 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.76 ±0.07</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.759 ±0.115 ±0.046</td><td>KHACHATRY...16D</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.69 ±0.07 ±0.09</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV, K*⁰µ⁺µ⁻</td></tr><tr><td>0.87 ±0.16 ±0.07</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.84 ±0.28 ±0.06</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.78 ±0.21 ±0.05</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr></table>

B(B⁰ → K*⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (4.3 < q² < 8.68 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.87 ±0.21</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.15 ±0.18<sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.28</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV, K*⁰µ⁺µ⁻</td></tr><tr><td>1.62 ±0.31 ±0.18</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.73 ±0.43 ±0.15</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>3.02 ±0.35 ±0.22</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr></table>

B(B⁰ → K*⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (10.09 < q² < 12.86 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.49 ±0.15</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.3.</td><td></td><td>See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>1.72 ±0.11 ±0.14</td><td>KHACHATRY...16D</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.19 ±0.11<sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.17</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV, K*⁰µ⁺µ⁻</td></tr><tr><td>1.50 ±0.25 ±0.25</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.77 ±0.36 ±0.12</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.52 ±0.25 ±0.19</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.49±0.15 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_618.png" /></figure>

B(B⁰ → K*⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (10.09 < q² < 12.86 GeV²/c⁴) (units 10⁻⁷)

B(B⁰ → K*⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (14.18 < q² < 16.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.09 ±0.10</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.22 ±0.11 ±0.09</td><td>KHACHATRY...16D</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.02 ±0.11<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.15</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV, K*⁰µ⁺µ⁻</td></tr><tr><td>0.84<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.15</sub> ±0.09</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.34 ±0.26 ±0.08</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.15 ±0.26 ±0.09</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr></table>

B(B⁰ → K*⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (16.0 < q² < 19.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.27 ±0.09</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.26 ±0.09 ±0.09</td><td>KHACHATRY...16D</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.23 ±0.12<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.18</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV, K*⁰µ⁺µ⁻</td></tr><tr><td>1.56 ±0.18 ±0.15</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.97 ±0.26 ±0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.50 ±0.24 ±0.15</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr></table>

B(B⁰ → K*(892)⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (15.0 < q² < 19.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.80 ±0.13</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.2 <sup>+0.5</sup><sub>-0.4</sub> ±0.2</td><td>1 WEHLE</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>2.0 <sup>+0.6</sup><sub>-0.5</sub> ±0.2</td><td>2 WEHLE</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.744 <sup>+0.072</sup><sub>-0.076</sub> ±0.123</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.95 <sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.09</sub> ±0.13</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16AO LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 17Q</td></tr></table>

¹Measured with µ⁺µ⁻ as lepton pair.

²Measured with e⁺e⁻ as lepton pair.

B(B⁰ → K*⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (1.0 < q² < 6.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.74 ±0.11</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.9 <sup>+0.6</sup><sub>-0.5</sub> ±0.3</td><td>1,2 WEHLE</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.8 <sup>+0.6</sup><sub>-0.6</sub> ±0.2</td><td>1,3 WEHLE</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.68 ±0.083 ±0.12</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.90 ±0.20</td><td>2 KHACHATRY...16D</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.42 ±0.41 ±0.12</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.92<sup>+0.10</sup><sub>-0.09</sub> ±0.14</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AO LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 17Q</td></tr><tr><td>1.70 ±0.15 <sup>+0.20</sup><sub>-0.25</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13Y LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 16AO</td></tr><tr><td>2.20 ±0.30 ±0.20</td><td>CHATRCHYAN 13BL</td><td>CMS</td><td>Repl. by KHACHA-TRYAN 16D</td></tr><tr><td>2.10 ±0.30 ±0.15</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12U LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13Y</td></tr></table>

¹Result is determined for the range 1.1 < q² < 6.0 GeV⁴/c².

²Measured with µ⁺µ⁻ as lepton pair.

³Measured with e⁺e⁻ as lepton pair.

B(B⁰ → K*⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (0.0 < q² < 4.3 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2.60 ±0.45 ±0.17</strong></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B(B⁰ → K*⁰µ⁺µ⁻)/B(B⁰ → K*⁰e⁺e⁻) (0.045 < q² < 1.1 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.91 ±0.09</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.927 <sup>+0.093</sup><sub>-0.087</sub> ±0.036</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.46 <sup>+0.55</sup><sub>-0.27</sub> ±0.13</td><td>WEHLE</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.66 <sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.07</sub> ±0.03</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>17W LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹Measured for the region 0.1 < q² < 1.1 GeV²/c⁴.

²Superseded by AAIJ 23AB.

B(B⁰ → K*⁰µ⁺µ⁻)/B(B⁰ → K*⁰e⁺e⁻) (1.1 < q² < 6.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.03 ±0.07</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.027 <sup>+0.072</sup><sub>-0.068</sub> ±0.026</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.06 <sup>+0.63</sup><sub>-0.38</sub> ±0.13</td><td>WEHLE</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.69 <sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.07</sub> ±0.05</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17W LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹Superseded by AAIJ 23AB.

B(B⁰ → K*⁰µ⁺µ⁻)/B(B⁰ → K*⁰e⁺e⁻) (15.0 < q² < 19.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.12 <sup>+0.61</sup><sub>-0.36</sub> ±0.10</strong></td><td>WEHLE</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

B(B⁰ → K⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (q² < 2.0 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.24 <sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.20</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.21 <sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.23</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.31 ±0.37 ±0.02</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B(B⁰ → K⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (2.0 < q² < 4.3 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.24 <sup>+0.35</sup><sub>-0.30</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.07 <sup>+0.25</sup><sub>-0.21</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.93 ±0.49 ±0.07</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B(B⁰ → K⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (4.3 < q² < 8.68 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.08 ±0.27</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.23 ±0.31</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.66 ±0.51 ±0.05</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

B(B⁰ → K⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻) (10.09 < q² < 12.86 GeV²/c⁴)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.27 ±0.27</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.50 <sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.19</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03 ±0.22 ±0.01</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>
$$B(B^0 \to K^0 \ell^+ \ell^-) (14.18 < q^2 < 16.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$0.29^{+0.21}_{-0.15} \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$$

Error includes scale factor of 1.8.

<table><tr><td>0.20<sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.09</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.73±0.26±0.06</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

$$B(B^0 \to K^0 \ell^+ \ell^-) (q^2 > 16.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$0.31^{+0.16}_{-0.12} \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$$

<table><tr><td>0.35<sup>+0.21</sup><sub>-0.14</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.21±0.18±0.16</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

$$B(B^0 \to K^0 \ell^+ \ell^-) (1.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$0.91^{+0.15}_{-0.13} \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$$

<table><tr><td>0.62<sup>+0.44</sup><sub>-0.32</sub></td><td>±0.02</td><td>1 CHOUDHURY 21</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.12<sup>+0.50</sup><sub>-0.40</sub></td><td>±0.04</td><td>2 CHOUDHURY 21</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.916<sup>+0.172</sup><sub>-0.157</sub></td><td>±0.004</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>14M LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.98</td><td>±0.61</td><td>±0.08</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.65<sup>+0.45</sup><sub>-0.35</sub></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AH LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14M</td></tr></table>

1 Measured for $B^0 \to K_S^0 \mu^+ \mu^-$ decays. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.

2 Measured for $B^0 \to K_S^0 e^+ e^-$ decays. Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.

3 Uses $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^0) = (0.928 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.037) \times 10^{-3}$ for normalisation and $\mu^+ \mu^-$ as a lepton pair. Measured in $1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$.

$$B(B^0 \to K^0 \mu^+ \mu^-) / B(B^0 \to K^0 e^+ e^-) (1.0 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$0.64^{+0.18}_{-0.13} \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$$

<table><tr><td>0.66<sup>+0.20</sup><sub>-0.14</sub></td><td>±0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>22J LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.55<sup>+0.46</sup><sub>-0.34</sub></td><td>±0.01</td><td>2 CHOUDHURY 21</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

1 Measured in the range $1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$.

2 Measured from the ratio of $K_S^0 \mu^+ \mu^-$ and $K_S^0 e^+ e^-$: Measurements in other $q^2$ bins are also reported.

$$B(B^0 \to K^0 \ell^+ \ell^-) (0.0 < q^2 < 4.3 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>1.27±0.62±0.10</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11AI CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

$$B(B^0 \to K^0 \ell^+ \ell^-) (15.0 < q^2 < 22.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.67<sup>+0.11</sup><sub>-0.11</sub></td><td>±0.04</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14M LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S) K^0) = (0.928 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.037) \times 10^{-3}$ for normalisation and $\mu^+ \mu^-$ as a lepton pair.

$$B(B^0 \to K^0 e^+ e^-) (1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>13±3±1</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>22J LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 The reported value is converted from the measured $dB/dq^2 = (2.6 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.1) \times 10^{-8}$ ($\text{GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$)$^{-1}$ by multiplying by the $\Delta q^2 = 4.9 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$ range.

$$B(B^0 \to K_{0,2}^{0}(1430)\mu^+ \mu^-) (1.10 < q^2 < 6.00 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>4.02±0.44±0.31</td><td>1.2 AAIJ</td><td>16AP LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Measured the differential branching fraction and angular moments of the decay $B^0 \to K^+ \pi^- \mu^+ \mu^-$ in the $K^+ \pi^- \pi^+$ invariant mass range $1330 < m(K^+ \pi^-) < 1530 \text{ MeV}/\text{c}^2$.

2 The reported value is converted from the measured $dB/dq^2 = (0.82 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.063) \times 10^{-8}$ ($\text{GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$)$^{-1}$ by multiplying by the $\Delta q^2 = 4.9 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4$ range.

$$F_H(B^0 \to K^0 \mu^+ \mu^-) (1.1 < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

$F_H$ is a fractional contribution of (pseudo) scalar and tensor amplitudes to the decay width in the massless muon approximation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.78±0.46±0.09</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14O LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 140 reports 68% C.L. interval, which we encode as midpoint with uncertainty as half of the width of interval.

$$F_H(B^0 \to K^0 \mu^+ \mu^-) (15.0 < q^2 < 22.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.34±0.25±0.03</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14O LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 140 reports 68% C.L. interval, which we encode as midpoint with uncertainty as half of the width of interval.

PRODUCTION ASYMMETRIES

$$A_P(B^0)$$

$$A_P(B^0) = [\sigma(\bar{B}^0) - \sigma(B^0)] / [\sigma(\bar{B}^0) + \sigma(B^0)]$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$-0.3 \pm 0.6 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$ Error includes scale factor of 1.7. See the ideogram below.

<table><tr><td>0.44±0.88±0.11</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17BF LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-1.40±0.55±0.10</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17BF LHCB</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.25±0.48±0.05</td><td>2 AABOUD</td><td>16G ATLS</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.35±0.76±0.28</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>14BP LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 17BF, pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 AAIJ 17BF uses $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*0$ decays with $B^0$ transverse momenta $p_T$ and rapidities $y$ in the region of $0 < p_T < 30 \text{ GeV/c}$ and $2.1 < y < 4.5$.

2 Based on time-dependent analysis of $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*0$ decay in kinematic range $p_T > 10 \text{ GeV/c}$ and $|\eta| < 2.5$.

3 Based on time-dependent analysis of $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*0$ and $B^0 \to D^- \pi^+$ in kinematic range $4 < p_T < 30 \text{ GeV/c}$ and $2.5 < \eta < 4.5$.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
-0.3±0.6 (Error scaled by 1.7)

<figure><img src="image_619.png" /></figure>

$A_P(B^0)$ (units 10$^{-2}$)

$$A(B^0 + \bar{B}^0) \text{ in } K_S^0 K^- \pi^+$$

$$A(B^0 + \bar{B}^0) = [n(K_S^0 K^- \pi^+) - n(K_S^0 K^+ \pi^-)] / [n(K_S^0 K^- \pi^+) + n(K_S^0 K^+ \pi^-)]$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-8.5±8.9±0.2</td><td>LAI</td><td>19 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

FORWARD-BACKWARD ASYMMETRIES

$$A_{FB} \text{ in } B^0 \to D^{*-} \mu^+ \nu_e$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$0.225±0.018 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$

<table><tr><td>0.228±0.012±0.018</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>23J BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.218±0.030±0.009</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

$$A_{FB} \text{ in } B^0 \to D^{*-} \mu^+ \nu_\mu$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$0.235±0.033 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$ Error includes scale factor of 1.7.

<table><tr><td>0.211±0.011±0.021</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>23J BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.281±0.032±0.007</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

$$\Delta(A_{FB}) = (A_{FB}^{\mu} - A_{FB}^{e}) \text{ in } B^0 \to D^{*-} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell}$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$-0.018±0.020 \text{ OUR AVERAGE}$

<table><tr><td>-0.024±0.043±0.016</td><td>1 ADACHI</td><td>23H BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.017±0.016±0.016</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>23J BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.063±0.044±0.012</td><td>PRIM</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

1 ADACHI 23h measurement is based on the angular asymmetries of $B^0 \to D^{*-} \ell^+ \nu_\ell$ decays using explicit reconstruction of the B tag. Other asymmetries from $\Delta(S_3)$, $\Delta(S_5)$, $\Delta(S_7)$, and $\Delta(S_9)$ are also reported.

B⁰ REFERENCES

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>24 PRL 132 021801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADACHI</td><td>24 PR D109 012001</td><td>I. Adachi et al.</td><td>(BELLE II Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AB PRL 131 051803</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ Also</td><td>PR D108 032002</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AD PRL 131 091901</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AG PR D108 032007</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AR PRL 131 111802</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AY JHEP 2310 106</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AZ JHEP 2310 123</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23B PR D108 012017</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23F JHEP 2306 143</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23G JHEP 2306 073</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23T PR D108 012007</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>23W PR D108 012018</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr></table>
<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>AAU</td>
      <td>23Y</td>
      <td>PR D108 012021</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABUDINEN</td>
      <td>23D</td>
      <td>PR D107 L091102</td>
      <td>F. Abudinen et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE II Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABUDINEN</td>
      <td>23E</td>
      <td>PR D107 112009</td>
      <td>F. Abudinen et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE II Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ADACHI</td>
      <td>23E</td>
      <td>PRL 131 111803</td>
      <td>I. Adachi et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE II Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ADACHI</td>
      <td>23H</td>
      <td>PRL 131 181601</td>
      <td>I. Adachi et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE II Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ADACHI</td>
      <td>23I</td>
      <td>PR D108 072012</td>
      <td>I. Adachi et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE II Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ADACHI</td>
      <td>23J</td>
      <td>PR D108 092013</td>
      <td>I. Adachi et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE II Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CAO</td>
      <td>23</td>
      <td>PRL 131 211811</td>
      <td>L. Cao et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CHANG</td>
      <td>23</td>
      <td>PR D108 052011</td>
      <td>C.-Y. Chang et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>DONG</td>
      <td>23</td>
      <td>PR D108 1011102</td>
      <td>T.V. Dong et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>HIRATA</td>
      <td>23</td>
      <td>PR D107 112011</td>
      <td>H. Hirata et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>KROHN</td>
      <td>23</td>
      <td>PR D107 012003</td>
      <td>J.-F. Krohn et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>KUMAR</td>
      <td>23</td>
      <td>PR D107 031101</td>
      <td>M. Kumar et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LEES</td>
      <td>23B</td>
      <td>PR D107 092001</td>
      <td>J.P. Lees et al.</td>
      <td>(BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LI</td>
      <td>23E</td>
      <td>PRL 130 031901</td>
      <td>Y.B. Li et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>MEIER</td>
      <td>23</td>
      <td>PR D107 092003</td>
      <td>F. Meier et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>PRIM</td>
      <td>23</td>
      <td>PR D108 0812002</td>
      <td>M. Prim et al.</td>
      <td>(CMS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>TUMASYAN</td>
      <td>23A</td>
      <td>PL B842 137955</td>
      <td>A. Tumasyan et al.</td>
      <td>(CMS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>22</td>
      <td>PRL 128 048101</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Also</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>PR D105 012010</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>22J</td>
      <td>PRL 128 191802</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>22N</td>
      <td>PR D105 072005</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>22W</td>
      <td>PR D108 010206</td>
      <td>A. Tumasyan et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>22S</td>
      <td>JHEP 2205 067</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BLOOMFIELD</td>
      <td>22</td>
      <td>PR D105 072007</td>
      <td>T. Bloomfield et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>HADJIVASILIOU22</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>PR D105 051101</td>
      <td>C. Hadjivasilou et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>JEON</td>
      <td>22</td>
      <td>PR D106 012006</td>
      <td>H.B. J. et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>TAUASYAN</td>
      <td>22A</td>
      <td>PR D106 012007</td>
      <td>A. Tumasyan et al.</td>
      <td>(CMS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>WAHEED</td>
      <td>22</td>
      <td>PR D105 012003</td>
      <td>E. Waheed et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>21K</td>
      <td>CP C45 043001</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>210</td>
      <td>JHEP 2103 075</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>21S</td>
      <td>JHEP 2106 177</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>21W</td>
      <td>JHEP 2106 177</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ATMACAN</td>
      <td>21A</td>
      <td>PR D104 L091105</td>
      <td>H. Atmacan et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CAO</td>
      <td>21A</td>
      <td>PR D104 012008</td>
      <td>L. Cao et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CHOUDHURY</td>
      <td>21</td>
      <td>JHEP 2103 105</td>
      <td>S. Choudhury et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>KANG</td>
      <td>21</td>
      <td>PR D103 032003</td>
      <td>K.H. Kang et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>MOHANTY</td>
      <td>21</td>
      <td>PR D103 052013</td>
      <td>S. Mohanty et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>MOHANDEED</td>
      <td>21</td>
      <td>PR D103 079901</td>
      <td>E. Mohanideed et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>WEHLE</td>
      <td>21</td>
      <td>PRL 126 161801</td>
      <td>S. Wehle et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>20AG</td>
      <td>PR D102 051102</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>20AN</td>
      <td>JHEP 2012 139</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>20AO</td>
      <td>JHEP 2012 081</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>20P</td>
      <td>PR D102 021011</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>20L</td>
      <td>JHEP 2003 147</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>20W</td>
      <td>JHEP 212 118102</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CHILIKIN</td>
      <td>20</td>
      <td>JHEP 2005 034</td>
      <td>K. Chilikin et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CHU</td>
      <td>20</td>
      <td>PR D101 050212</td>
      <td>K. Chu et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CH</td>
      <td>20</td>
      <td>PR D101 050213</td>
      <td>Y. K. et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>SIRUNYAN</td>
      <td>20A</td>
      <td>PR D102 012003</td>
      <td>A. Sirunyan et al.</td>
      <td>(CMS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AABOUD</td>
      <td>19L</td>
      <td>JHEP 1904 098</td>
      <td>M. Aaboud et al.</td>
      <td>(ATLAS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>19AK</td>
      <td>PRL 123 211801</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>19AP</td>
      <td>JHEP 1912 155</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>19J</td>
      <td>JHEP 1905 026</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>19L</td>
      <td>PRL 1907 032</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>19N</td>
      <td>JHEP 1908 041</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>19U</td>
      <td>PRL 122 191804</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CHILIKIN</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>PR D100 012001</td>
      <td>K. Chilikin et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CHOU</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>PR D100 012002</td>
      <td>P.-C. Chou et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CHRG</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>PRL 099 071102</td>
      <td>V. Gharg et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LAI</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>PR D100 011110</td>
      <td>Y.-T. Lai et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LI</td>
      <td>19C</td>
      <td>PR D100 031101</td>
      <td>Y.B. Li et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>PAL</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>PRL 099 091104</td>
      <td>B. Pal et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>WAHEED</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>PR D100 052007</td>
      <td>E. Waheed et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>WATANUKI</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>PRL 099 032012</td>
      <td>S. Watanuki et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>YUS</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>PR D100 011102</td>
      <td>Y. Yusa et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AABOUD</td>
      <td>18BY</td>
      <td>JHEP 1810 047</td>
      <td>M. Aaboud et al.</td>
      <td>(ATLAS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>18AN</td>
      <td>EPJ C78 1019</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>18AY</td>
      <td>PRL D98 071103</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>18AZ</td>
      <td>PRL D98 072006</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>18D</td>
      <td>PRL 120 171802</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>18F</td>
      <td>PRL 120 261801</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>18O</td>
      <td>PRL D98 032004</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>18T</td>
      <td>JHEP 183 078</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>18Z</td>
      <td>JHEP 1806 084</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ABAZOV</td>
      <td>18B</td>
      <td>PR D98 052010</td>
      <td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>ADACHI</td>
      <td>18</td>
      <td>PRL 098 112012</td>
      <td>I. Adachi et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE and BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Also</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>PRL 121 261801</td>
      <td>I. Adachi et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE and BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LEES</td>
      <td>18C</td>
      <td>PRL D98 071102</td>
      <td>J.P. Lees et al.</td>
      <td>(BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LI</td>
      <td>18D</td>
      <td>EPJ C78 928</td>
      <td>Y.B. Li et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>NAKANO</td>
      <td>18</td>
      <td>PRL D97 092003</td>
      <td>H. Nakano et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>PAL</td>
      <td>18</td>
      <td>PRL 112 00008</td>
      <td>B. Pal et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>PDG</td>
      <td>18</td>
      <td>PRL D98 030001</td>
      <td>M. Tanabashi et al.</td>
      <td>(PDG Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>SANDILYA</td>
      <td>18</td>
      <td>PRL D98 070110</td>
      <td>S. Sandilaya et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>SIRUNYAN</td>
      <td>18BY</td>
      <td>EPJ C78 457</td>
      <td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td>
      <td>(CMS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>SIRUNYAN</td>
      <td>18DF</td>
      <td>EPJ C78 939</td>
      <td>A.M. Sirunyan et al.</td>
      <td>(CMS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>WAJEN</td>
      <td>18</td>
      <td>PR D98 052005</td>
      <td>V. Wossen et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17A</td>
      <td>PRL D95 012006</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17AI</td>
      <td>PRL 119 191801</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17AJ</td>
      <td>PRL 118 251802</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17BD</td>
      <td>PRL D96 051103</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17B</td>
      <td>PRL B774 139</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17BJ</td>
      <td>PRL 119 232001</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17BN</td>
      <td>JHEP 1711 170</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17BP</td>
      <td>JHEP 1711 027</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17G</td>
      <td>PRL 118 081001</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17N</td>
      <td>JHEP 1703 001</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17R</td>
      <td>PRL 120 171802</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>17W</td>
      <td>JHEP 1708 055</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>GRYGIER</td>
      <td>17</td>
      <td>PRL D96 091101</td>
      <td>J. Grygier et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>HORIGUCHI</td>
      <td>17</td>
      <td>PRL 119 191802</td>
      <td>T. Horiguchi et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>JULIUS</td>
      <td>17</td>
      <td>PRL D96 032007</td>
      <td>T. Julius et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AABOUD</td>
      <td>16G</td>
      <td>PL PLE 753 424</td>
      <td>M. Aboud et al.</td>
      <td>(ATLAS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AABOUD</td>
      <td>16L</td>
      <td>EPJ C76 513</td>
      <td>M. Aaboud et al.</td>
      <td>(ATLAS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>16</td>
      <td>JHEP 1601 012</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>16AA</td>
      <td>JHEP 1608 137</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>16AN</td>
      <td>PRL 117 261801</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>16AD</td>
      <td>JHEP 1611 047</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>16AP</td>
      <td>JHEP 1612 065</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>16AV</td>
      <td>EPJ C76 412</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>16E</td>
      <td>PRL 116 241601</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>16S</td>
      <td>PR D93 121808</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>16Z</td>
      <td>JHEP 1606 131</td>
      <td>R. Aaij et al.</td>
      <td>(LHCb Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>BRARDWAJ</td>
      <td>16</td>
      <td>PL V. Hardwaj et al.</td>
      <td>V. V. Hardwaj et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>CHOBANOVA</td>
      <td>16</td>
      <td>PRL D93 031101</td>
      <td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td>
      <td>(BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>DEL-AMO-SA...</td>
      <td>16</td>
      <td>PRL D93 052013</td>
      <td>P. del Amo Sanchez et al.</td>
      <td>(BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>GLATTAUER</td>
      <td>16</td>
      <td>PRL D93 032006</td>
      <td>R. Glattauer et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>HAMER</td>
      <td>16</td>
      <td>PRL D93 032007</td>
      <td>P. Hamer et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>KHACHATRY...</td>
      <td>16D</td>
      <td>PL B753 424</td>
      <td>V. Khachatryan et al.</td>
      <td>(CMS Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>KING</td>
      <td>16</td>
      <td>PRL D93 111101</td>
      <td>Z. King et al.</td>
      <td>(BELLE Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LEES</td>
      <td>16</td>
      <td>PRL 116 048101</td>
      <td>J.P. Lees et al.</td>
      <td>(BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>LEES</td>
      <td>16E</td>
      <td>PRL D94 091110</td>
      <td>J.P. Lees et al.</td>
      <td>(BABAR Collab.)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰, B⁺/B⁰ ADMIXTURE

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>01B</td><td>PRL D64 092001</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AMMAR</td><td>01B</td><td>PRL 87 271801</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ANDERSON</td><td>01B</td><td>PRL 86 2732</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ANDERSON</td><td>01B</td><td>PRL 87 181803</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>01B</td><td>PRL 86 2515</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>01B</td><td>PRL 87 091801</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>01B</td><td>PRL 87 151801</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>01E</td><td>PRL 87 151802</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>01F</td><td>PRL 87 201803</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>01G</td><td>PRL 87 221802</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>01H</td><td>PRL 87 241801</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>01J</td><td>PRL 87 241803</td><td>(BABAR Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARATE</td><td>01J</td><td>PRL C20 431</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BRIERE</td><td>01</td><td>PRL 86 3718</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>EDWARDS</td><td>01</td><td>PRL 86 30</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>JAFFE</td><td>01</td><td>PRL 86 5000</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>RICCHI</td><td>01</td><td>PRL D63 031103</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>00Q</td><td>PRL 86 215</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI,G</td><td>00B</td><td>PL B493 266</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>00B</td><td>PRL D62 071101</td><td>(SLD Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AFFOLDER</td><td>00C</td><td>PRL D61 072005</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AFFOLDER</td><td>00N</td><td>PRL 85 4668</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AFFOLDER</td><td>00B</td><td>PRL D62 112003</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ANASTASSOV</td><td>00</td><td>PL R4 1393</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ARTUSO</td><td>00</td><td>PRL 84 492</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AVERY</td><td>00</td><td>PRL D62 051101</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARATE</td><td>00Q</td><td>PL B492 429</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARATE</td><td>00R</td><td>PL B492 275</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BEHRENS</td><td>00</td><td>PRL D61 052001</td><td>(B.H. Behrens et al.)</td></tr><tr><td>BEHRENS</td><td>00B</td><td>PL B490 36</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BERGFIELD</td><td>00B</td><td>PRL D62 091102</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHEN</td><td>00</td><td>PRL 85 525</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>COAN</td><td>00</td><td>PRL 84 5283</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>COIN-HEN...</td><td>00</td><td>PL R4 515</td><td>(D. Cronin-Hennessy et al.)</td></tr><tr><td>CSRONA</td><td>00</td><td>PRL D61 111101</td><td>(S.E. CSrona et al.)</td></tr><tr><td>JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>PRL 85 2881</td><td>(C.P. Jessop et al.)</td></tr><tr><td>LIPLEES</td><td>00</td><td>PRL D62 032005</td><td>(E. Liplees et al.)</td></tr><tr><td>RICCHI</td><td>00</td><td>PRL 85 520</td><td>(S.J. Richichi et al.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>00</td><td>PL B493 509</td><td>(G. Abbiendi et al.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>99K</td><td>PRL D60 051101</td><td>(F. Abe et al.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>99Q</td><td>PRL D60 072003</td><td>(F. Abe et al.)</td></tr><tr><td>AFFOLDER</td><td>99B</td><td>PRL 83 3378</td><td>T. Affolder et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AFFOLDER</td><td>99C</td><td>PRL D60 112004</td><td>T. Affolder et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ARTUSO</td><td>99</td><td>PRL 82 3020</td><td>M. Artuso et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BARTELT</td><td>99</td><td>PRL 82 3746</td><td>J. Bartelt et al.</td></tr><tr><td>COAN</td><td>99</td><td>PRL D59 111101</td><td>T.E. Coan et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>98B</td><td>PRL D57 5382</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>98C</td><td>PRL 80 2057</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>Also</td><td>PRL D59 032001</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>98Q</td><td>PRL D58 092002</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>98U</td><td>PRL 81 5513</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>98V</td><td>PRL 81 5742</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>98D</td><td>EPJ C5 195</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>98E</td><td>PL B349 417</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>98Z</td><td>EPJ C5 379</td><td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BARATE</td><td>98</td><td>PL C4 387</td><td>R. Barate et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98</td><td>PRL 80 3710</td><td>B.H. Behrens et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BERGFIELD</td><td>98</td><td>PRL 81 272</td><td>T. Bergfield et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BRANDENB...</td><td>98</td><td>PRL 80 2762</td><td>G. Brandenbrug et al.</td></tr><tr><td>GODANG</td><td>98</td><td>PRL 83 3456</td><td>R. Godang et al.</td></tr><tr><td>NEMATI</td><td>98</td><td>PRL D57 5363</td><td>R. Nemati et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>97J</td><td>PRL 79 590</td><td>K. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>97F</td><td>ZPHY C74 19</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>Also</td><td>ZPHY C75 579 (errat.)</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>97N</td><td>PRL D76 579</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>97B</td><td>PL B391 474</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>97C</td><td>PL B391 481</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>98Z</td><td>PL B395 128</td><td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97U</td><td>ZPHY C76 401</td><td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97V</td><td>ZPHY C76 417</td><td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ARTUSO</td><td>97</td><td>PRL 81 321</td><td>M. Artuso et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ASNER</td><td>97</td><td>PRL 79 799</td><td>D. Asner et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ATHANAS</td><td>97</td><td>PRL 79 2208</td><td>M. Athanas et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>97</td><td>PL B395 373</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>97D</td><td>ZPHY C75 397</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td></tr><tr><td>FU</td><td>97</td><td>X. Fu et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>JESSOP</td><td>97</td><td>PRL 79 4533</td><td>C.P. Jessop et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>96B</td><td>PRL D53 3496</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>96C</td><td>PRL 76 4462</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>96H</td><td>PRL 76 2015</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>96Q</td><td>PRL D54 6596</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>96P</td><td>ZPHY C71 539</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>96Q</td><td>ZPHY C72 17</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>96E</td><td>PL B383 487</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ADAM</td><td>96D</td><td>ZPHY C72 207</td><td>W. Adam et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>96D</td><td>PL B374 256</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALXANDER</td><td>96E</td><td>PL B377 5000</td><td>J.P. Alexander et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALXANDER</td><td>96V</td><td>ZPHY C72 377</td><td>G. Alexander et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>PRL D53 1039</td><td>D.M. Asner et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BARISH</td><td>96B</td><td>PRL 76 1570</td><td>B.C. Barish et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BISHAI</td><td>96</td><td>PL B369 186</td><td>M. Bishai et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96J</td><td>ZPHY C71 31</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96V</td><td>PL B384 471</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td></tr><tr><td>DUBOSCQ</td><td>96</td><td>PRL 76 3898</td><td>J.E. Duboscq et al.</td></tr><tr><td>GIBAUT</td><td>96</td><td>PRL D53 4734</td><td>D. Gibaut et al.</td></tr><tr><td>PDG</td><td>96</td><td>PRL D54 1</td><td>R. M. Barnett et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>95Z</td><td>PRL 82 3068</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>95N</td><td>PRL B357 255</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>95Q</td><td>ZPHY C68 13</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>95H</td><td>PL B363 127</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>95I</td><td>PL B363 137</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ADAM</td><td>95</td><td>ZPHY C68 363</td><td>W. Adam et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AKERS</td><td>95J</td><td>PRL D66 555</td><td>R. Akers et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AKERS</td><td>95T</td><td>ZPHY C67 379</td><td>R. Akers et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>95</td><td>PL B341 435</td><td>J. Alexander et al.</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>95</td><td>PL B347 469 (errat.)</td><td>J. Alexander et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BARISH</td><td>95</td><td>PRL D51 1014</td><td>B.C. Barish et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>95N</td><td>PL B359 236</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>94D</td><td>PRL 72 3456</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>94B</td><td>PL B338 409</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AKERS</td><td>94C</td><td>PL B327 411</td><td>R. Akers et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AKERS</td><td>94H</td><td>PL B336 585</td><td>R. Akers et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AKERS</td><td>94J</td><td>PL B337 199</td><td>R. Akers et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AKERS</td><td>94L</td><td>PL B337 393</td><td>R. Akers et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>PRL D50 43</td><td>M.S. Alam et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94G</td><td>PL B324 249</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94G</td><td>PL B340 217</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AMMAR</td><td>94</td><td>PRL D49 5701</td><td>R. Ammar et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ATHANAS</td><td>94</td><td>PRL 73 3503</td><td>M. Athanas et al.</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>94</td><td>PRL 74 3090 (errat.)</td><td>M. Athanas et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>94B</td><td>PL B322 441</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PDG</td><td>94</td><td>PR D50 1173</td><td>L. Montanet et al.</td></tr><tr><td>PROCARIO</td><td>94</td><td>PRL 73 1472</td><td>M. Procario et al.</td></tr><tr><td>STONE</td><td>94</td><td>HEPSY 93-11</td><td>S. Stone</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">Published in B Decays, 2nd Edition, World Scientific, Singapore</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>93D</td><td>ZPHY C57 181</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>93G</td><td>PL B312 253</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ACTON</td><td>93C</td><td>PL B307 247</td><td>P.D. Acton et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>93</td><td>ZPHY C57 533</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ZPHY C60 11</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>93B</td><td>PL B319 365</td><td>J. Alexander et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AMMAR</td><td>93</td><td>PRL 71 674</td><td>R. Ammar et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BARTELT</td><td>93</td><td>PRL 71 1680</td><td>J.E. Bartelt et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BATTLE</td><td>93</td><td>PRL 71 3922</td><td>M. Battle et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BEAN</td><td>93B</td><td>PRL 70 2681</td><td>A. Bean et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>93D</td><td>PL B307 194</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td></tr><tr><td>Ako</td><td></td><td>PL B325 537 (errat.)</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>93K</td><td>PL B313 498</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td></tr><tr><td>SANGHERA</td><td>93</td><td>PR D47 791</td><td>S. Sanghera et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>92C</td><td>PL B275 195</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>92G</td><td>ZPHY C54 1</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>92L</td><td>ZPHY C55 357</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BORTOLETTO</td><td>92</td><td>PR D45 212</td><td>D. Bortolettto et al.</td></tr><tr><td>HENDERSON</td><td>92</td><td>PR D45 212</td><td>S. Henderson et al.</td></tr><tr><td>KRAMER</td><td>92</td><td>PL B279 181</td><td>G. Kramer, W.F. Palmer</td></tr><tr><td>ALBAJAR</td><td>91E</td><td>PL B273 540</td><td>C. Albajar et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B</td><td>PL B254 288</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91C</td><td>PL B255 297</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91E</td><td>PL B262 148</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BERKELMAN</td><td>91Z</td><td>ARNPS 41 1</td><td>K. Berkelman, S. Stone</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">"Decays of B Mesons"</td></tr><tr><td>FULTON</td><td>91</td><td>PR D43 651</td><td>R. Fulton et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>PL B241 278</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>90C</td><td>ZPHY C48 543</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ANTREASYAN</td><td>90B</td><td>PL B247 553</td><td>D. Antreasyan et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BORTOLETTO</td><td>90</td><td>PL D4 2117</td><td>D. Bortolettto et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ELSEN</td><td>90</td><td>ZPHY C46 349</td><td>E. Elsen et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ROSNER</td><td>90</td><td>PR D42 3732</td><td>J.L. Rosner</td></tr><tr><td>WAGNER</td><td>90</td><td>PR D4 6095</td><td>S.R. Wagner et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>90C</td><td>PL B231 241</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89G</td><td>PL B229 304</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89J</td><td>PL B229 175</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89L</td><td>PL B232 554</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ARTUSO</td><td>89</td><td>PRL 62 2233</td><td>M. Artuso et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AVERILL</td><td>89</td><td>PR D39 123</td><td>D.A. Averill et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AVERY</td><td>89B</td><td>PL B223 470</td><td>P. Avery et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BEBEK</td><td>89</td><td>PRL 62 8</td><td>C. Bebek et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BORTOLETTO</td><td>89</td><td>PL B24 2436</td><td>D. Bortolettto et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BORTOLETTO</td><td>89B</td><td>PL 63 1667</td><td>D. Bortolettto et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>88F</td><td>PL B209 119</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>88K</td><td>PL B215 424</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>87C</td><td>PL B185 218</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>87D</td><td>PL B199 451</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>87J</td><td>PL B192 245</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>87I</td><td>PL B197 452</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AWERY</td><td>87</td><td>PL B183 429</td><td>P. Avery et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BEAN</td><td>87B</td><td>PR 58 183</td><td>A. Bean et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BEBEK</td><td>87</td><td>PR D36 1289</td><td>C. Bebek et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALAM</td><td>86</td><td>PR D34 3279</td><td>M.S. Alam et al.</td></tr><tr><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>86F</td><td>PL B182 95</td><td>H. Albrecht et al.</td></tr><tr><td>PDG</td><td>86</td><td>PR 170B 1</td><td>M. Aguilar-Benitez et al.</td></tr><tr><td>CHEN</td><td>86</td><td>PR D31 2386</td><td>A. Chen et al.</td></tr><tr><td>HAAS</td><td>85</td><td>PR 55 1248</td><td>J. Haas et al.</td></tr><tr><td>AVERY</td><td>84</td><td>PR 53 1309</td><td>P. Avery et al.</td></tr><tr><td>GILES</td><td>84</td><td>PR D30 2279</td><td>R. Giles et al.</td></tr><tr><td>BEHRENDS</td><td>83</td><td>PL 50 881</td><td>S. Behrends et al.</td></tr></tbody></table>

## B$^{\pm}$/B⁰ ADMIXTURE

### B DECAY MODES

The branching fraction measurements are for an admixture of B mesons at the $\Upsilon(4S)$. The values quoted assume that $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B\bar{B}) = 100\%$.

For inclusive branching fractions, e.g., $B \to D^{\pm} \text{ anything}$, the treatment of multiple D's in the final state must be defined. One possibility would be to count the number of events with one-or-more D's and divide by the total number of B's. Another possibility would be to count the total number of D's and divide by the total number of B's, which is the definition of average multiplicity. The two definitions are identical if only one D is allowed in the final state. Even though the "one-or-more" definition seems sensible, for practical reasons inclusive branching fractions are almost always measured using the multiplicity definition. For heavy final state particles, authors call their results inclusive branching fractions while for light particles some authors call their results multiplicities. In the B sections, we list all results as inclusive branching fractions, adopting a multiplicity definition. This means that inclusive branching fractions can exceed 100% and that inclusive partial widths can exceed total widths, just as inclusive cross sections can exceed total cross section.

B modes are charge conjugates of the modes below. Reactions indicate the weak decay vertex and do not include mixing.

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>f</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Scale factor/<br>Confidence level</th></tr></thead></table>

### Semileptonic and leptonic modes

* Γ₁ $e^{+} \nu_{e} \text{ anything}$ [a]

* Γ₂ $\mu^{+} \nu_{\mu} \text{ anything}$ [a]

* Γ₃ $\ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{ anything}$ [a,b] (10.82 ± 0.15) %

* Γ₄ $D^{0} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{ anything}$ [b] (2.6 ± 0.5) %

* Γ₅ $\bar{D}^{0} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{ anything}$ [b] (7.2 ± 1.5) %

* Γ₆ $\bar{D}^{0} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{ anything}$ (2.41 ± 0.12) %

* Γ₇ $D^{*+} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{ anything}$ [c] (6.7 ± 1.3) × 10⁻³

* Γ₈ $D^{*0} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{ anything}$
<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ9</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sup>*</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>[d] ( 4.95 ± 0.11 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ10</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sup>*</sup> e<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>e</sub></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ11</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sup>*</sup> μ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>μ</sub></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ12</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sup>**</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>[b,e] ( 2.7 ± 0.7 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ13</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sub>1</sub>(2420) ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 3.8 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup> S=2.4</td></tr><tr><td>Γ14</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sub>π</sub>ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything +<br><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sup>*</sup> πℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 2.6 ± 0.5 ) % S=1.5</td></tr><tr><td>Γ15</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sub>π</sub>ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 1.5 ± 0.6 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ16</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sup>*</sup> πℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 1.9 ± 0.4 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ17</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sub>2</sub>(2460) ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 4.4 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ18</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sup>*</sup> π<sup>+</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>( 1.00 ± 0.34 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ19</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sub>π</sub>π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>( 1.62 ± 0.32 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ20</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sup>*</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>( 9.4 ± 3.2 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ21</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sub>s</sub> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>[b] &lt; 7 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ22</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> K<sup>+</sup> anything</td><td>[b] &lt; 5 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ23</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sub>s</sub><sup>-</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> K<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>[b] &lt; 7 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ24</td><td>χ<sub>c</sub> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>( 10.63 ± 0.15 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ25</td><td>χ<sub>u</sub> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub></td><td>( 1.88 ± 0.27 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ26</td><td>χ<sub>u</sub> e<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>e</sub></td><td>( 1.57 ± 0.19 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ27</td><td>χ<sub>u</sub> μ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>μ</sub></td><td>( 1.62 ± 0.21 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ28</td><td>K<sup>+</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>[b] ( 6.3 ± 0.5 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ29</td><td>K<sup>-</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>[b] ( 10 ± 4 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ30</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>/K<sup>0</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>[b] ( 4.6 ± 0.5 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ31</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sub>τ</sub>ν<sub>τ</sub></td><td>( 8.6 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ32</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sup>*</sup> π<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>τ</sub></td><td>( 1.40 ± 0.07 ) %</td></tr></tbody></table>

### D, D*, or D<sub>s</sub> modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ33</td><td>D<sup>±</sup> anything</td><td>( 23.1 ± 1.2 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ34</td><td>D<sup>0</sup>/D<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>( 64.6 ± 2.1 ) % S=1.5</td></tr><tr><td>Γ35</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>±</sup> anything</td><td>( 22.5 ± 1.5 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ36</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>( 26.0 ± 2.7 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ37</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>±</sup> anything</td><td>[f] ( 10.6 ± 0.6 ) % S=1.7</td></tr><tr><td>Γ38</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>±</sup> anything</td><td>( 6.3 ± 1.0 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ39</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>±</sup> D<sup>(*)</sup></td><td>( 3.4 ± 0.6 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ40</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sub>D</sub><sub>50</sub>(2317)</td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ41</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">D</span><sub>D</sub><sub>s</sub>(2457)</td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ42</td><td>D<sup>(*)</sup> D<sup>(*)</sup> K<sup>0</sup> + D<sup>(*)</sup> D<sup>(*)</sup> K<sup>±</sup> [f,g] ( 7.1 <sup>+2.7</sup><sub>-1.7</sub> ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ43</td><td>b → c<span style="text-decoration: overline;">c</span>s</td><td>( 22 ± 4 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ44</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>(*)</sup> D<sup>(*)</sup></td><td>[f,g] ( 5.0 ± 0.4 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ45</td><td>D<sup>*</sup> D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>±</sup></td><td>[f] &lt; 5.9 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ46</td><td>D<sup>*</sup> D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>±</sup> + D<sup>*</sup> D<sup>±</sup></td><td>[f] &lt; 5.5 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ47</td><td>D<sup>±</sup> D<sup>±</sup></td><td>[f] &lt; 3.1 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ48</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>(*)</sup> ± D<sup>(*)</sup> X(nπ<sup>±</sup>)</td><td>[f,g] ( 9 <sup>+5</sup><sub>-4</sub> ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ49</td><td>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)<sup>γ</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.1 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ50</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>±</sup> π<sup>-</sup>, D<sub>s</sub><sup>±</sup> π<sup>-</sup>, D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> ρ<sup>-</sup>,<br>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> ρ<sup>-</sup>, D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> π<sup>0</sup>, D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> π<sup>0</sup>,<br>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> η, D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> η, D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> ρ<sup>0</sup>,<br>D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> ρ<sup>0</sup>, D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> ω, D<sub>s</sub><sup>+</sup> ω</td><td>[f] &lt; 4 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ51</td><td>D<sub>s</sub><sup>1</sup>(2536)<sup>+</sup> anything</td><td>&lt; 9.5 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Charmonium modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ52</td><td>J/ψ(1S) anything</td><td>( 1.094 ± 0.032 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ53</td><td>J/ψ(1S) (direct) anything</td><td>( 7.8 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup> S=1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Γ54</td><td>ψ(2S) anything</td><td>( 3.07 ± 0.21 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ55</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub>(1P) anything</td><td>( 3.55 ± 0.27 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup> S=1.3</td></tr><tr><td>Γ56</td><td>χ<sub>c1</sub>(1P) (direct) anything</td><td>( 3.08 ± 0.19 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ57</td><td>χ<sub>c2</sub>(1P) anything</td><td>( 9.9 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup> S=1.6</td></tr><tr><td>Γ58</td><td>χ<sub>c2</sub>(1P) (direct) anything</td><td>( 7.5 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ59</td><td>η<sub>c</sub>(1S) anything</td><td>&lt; 9 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ60</td><td>K χ<sub>c1</sub>(3872)</td><td>( 2.5 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ61</td><td>K X(3940), X → D<sup>0</sup>* D<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 6.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ62</td><td>K χ<sub>c0</sub>(3915), χ<sub>c0</sub> → ω J/ψ [η] ( 7.1 ± 3.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

### K or K* modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ63</td><td>K<sup>±</sup> anything</td><td>[f] ( 78.9 ± 2.5 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ64</td><td>K<sup>+</sup> anything</td><td>( 66 ± 5 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ65</td><td>K<sup>-</sup> anything</td><td>( 13 ± 4 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ66</td><td>K<sup>0</sup>/K<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>[f] ( 64 ± 4 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ67</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>±</sup> anything</td><td>( 18 ± 6 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ68</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>/K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>[f] ( 14.6 ± 2.6 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ69</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>γ</sup></td><td>( 4.2 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ70</td><td>ηKγ</td><td>( 8.5 <sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-1.6</sub> ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ71</td><td>K<sub>1</sub>(1400)<sup>γ</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.27 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ72</td><td>K<sub>2</sub><sup>*</sup>(1430)<sup>γ</sup></td><td>( 1.7 <sup>+0.6</sup><sub>-0.5</sub> ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ73</td><td>K<sub>2</sub>(1770)<sup>γ</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ74</td><td>K<sub>3</sub>(1780)<sup>γ</sup></td><td>&lt; 3.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ75</td><td>K<sub>4</sub><sup>*</sup>(2045)<sup>γ</sup></td><td>&lt; 1.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ76</td><td>Kη'(958)</td><td>( 8.3 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ77</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>η</sup>'(958)</td><td>( 4.1 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ78</td><td>Kη</td><td>&lt; 5.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ79</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>η</sup></td><td>( 1.8 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ80</td><td>Kφφ</td><td>( 2.3 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ81</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">b</span> → <span style="text-decoration: overline;">s</span>γ</td><td>( 3.49 ± 0.19 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ82</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">b</span> → <span style="text-decoration: overline;">d</span>γ</td><td>( 9.2 ± 3.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ83</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">b</span> → <span style="text-decoration: overline;">s</span>gluon</td><td>&lt; 6.8 % CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ84</td><td>η anything</td><td>( 2.6 <sup>+0.5</sup><sub>-0.8</sub> ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ85</td><td>η' anything</td><td>( 4.2 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ86</td><td>K<sup>+</sup> gluon (charmless)</td><td>&lt; 1.87 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ87</td><td>K<sup>0</sup> gluon (charmless)</td><td>( 1.9 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

### Light unflavored meson modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ88</td><td>ργ</td><td>( 1.39 ± 0.25 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.2</td></tr><tr><td>Γ89</td><td>ρ/ωγ</td><td>( 1.30 ± 0.23 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.2</td></tr><tr><td>Γ90</td><td>π<sup>±</sup> anything</td><td>[f,g] ( 358 ± 7 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ91</td><td>π<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>( 235 ± 11 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ92</td><td>η anything</td><td>( 17.6 ± 1.6 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ93</td><td>ρ<sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>( 21 ± 5 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ94</td><td>ω anything</td><td>&lt; 81 % CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ95</td><td>φ anything</td><td>( 3.43 ± 0.12 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ96</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">φ</span> K<sup>*</sup>(892)</td><td>&lt; 2.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ97</td><td><span style="text-decoration: overline;">b</span> → <span style="text-decoration: overline;">d</span> gluon</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ98</td><td>π<sup>+</sup> gluon (charmless)</td><td>( 3.7 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

### Baryon modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ99</td><td>Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>+</sup> / Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> anything</td><td>( 3.6 ± 0.4 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ100</td><td>Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>+</sup> anything</td><td>&lt; 1.3 % CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ101</td><td>Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> anything</td><td>&lt; 7 % CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ102</td><td>Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> ℓ<sup>+</sup> anything</td><td>&lt; 9 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ103</td><td>Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> e<sup>+</sup> anything</td><td>&lt; 1.8 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ104</td><td>Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> μ<sup>+</sup> anything</td><td>&lt; -1.4 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ105</td><td>Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> ρ anything</td><td>( 2.06 ± 0.33 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ106</td><td>Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> ρe<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>e</sub></td><td>&lt; 8 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ107</td><td>Σ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> anything</td><td>( 3.4 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ108</td><td>Σ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> anything</td><td>&lt; 8 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ109</td><td>Σ<sub>c</sub><sup>0</sup> anything</td><td>( 3.7 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ110</td><td>Σ<sup>0</sup><sub>c</sub> N(N = ρ or n)</td><td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ111</td><td>Ξ<sub>c</sub><sup>0</sup> anything, Ξ<sub>c</sub><sup>0</sup> → Ξ<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 1.93 ± 0.30 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup> S=1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Γ112</td><td>Ξ<sub>c</sub><sup>+</sup>, Ξ<sub>c</sub><sup>+</sup> → Ξ<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 4.5 <sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.2</sub> ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ113</td><td>ρ/p anything</td><td>[f] ( 8.0 ± 0.4 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ114</td><td>ρ/p (direct) anything</td><td>[f] ( 5.5 ± 0.5 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ115</td><td>p/p anything</td><td>&lt; 5.9 × 10<sup>-4</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ116</td><td>Λ/Λ anything</td><td>[f] ( 4.0 ± 0.5 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ117</td><td>Λ anything</td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ118</td><td>Λ anything</td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ119</td><td>Ξ<sup>-</sup>/Ξ<sup>+</sup> anything</td><td>[f] ( 2.7 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ120</td><td>baryons anything</td><td>( 6.8 ± 0.6 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ121</td><td>p/p anything</td><td>( 2.47 ± 0.23 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ122</td><td>Λp/p anything</td><td>[f] ( 2.5 ± 0.4 ) %</td></tr><tr><td>Γ123</td><td>ΛΛ anything</td><td>&lt; 5 × 10<sup>-3</sup> CL=90%</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Lepton Family number (LF) violating modes or $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current (B1) modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ124</td><td>s e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 ( 6.7 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=2.0</td></tr><tr><td>Γ125</td><td>s μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 ( 4.3 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ126</td><td>s ℓ<sup>+</sup> ℓ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 [b] ( 5.8 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.8</td></tr><tr><td>Γ127</td><td>πℓ<sup>+</sup> ℓ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 &lt; 5.9 × 10<sup>-8</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ128</td><td>πe<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 &lt; 1.10 × 10<sup>-7</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ129</td><td>πμ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 &lt; 5.0 × 10<sup>-8</sup> CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ130</td><td>K e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 ( 4.4 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ131</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892) e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 ( 1.19 ± 0.20 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup> S=1.2</td></tr><tr><td>Γ132</td><td>K μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 ( 4.4 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ133</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892) μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 ( 1.06 ± 0.09 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ134</td><td>K ℓ<sup>+</sup> ℓ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 ( 4.8 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ135</td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892) ℓ<sup>+</sup> ℓ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1 ( 1.05 ± 0.10 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ136</td><td>Kνν</td><td>B1 &lt; 1.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup> CL=90%</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B$^{±}$/B$^{0}$ ADMIXTURE

<table><tr><td>Γ<sub>137</sub></td><td>K<sup>*</sup>νν̄</td><td>B1</td><td>&lt;</td><td>2.7</td><td>× 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>138</sub></td><td>πνν̄</td><td>B1</td><td>&lt;</td><td>8</td><td>× 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>139</sub></td><td>ρνν̄</td><td>B1</td><td>&lt;</td><td>2.8</td><td>× 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>140</sub></td><td>s e<sup>±</sup> μ<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>[f]</td><td>&lt;</td><td>2.2</td><td>× 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>141</sub></td><td>πe<sup>±</sup> μ<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt;</td><td>9.2</td><td>× 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>142</sub></td><td>ρe<sup>±</sup> μ<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt;</td><td>3.2</td><td>× 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>143</sub></td><td>K e<sup>±</sup> μ<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt;</td><td>3.8</td><td>× 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>144</sub></td><td>K*(892) e<sup>±</sup> μ<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt;</td><td>5.1</td><td>× 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CL=90%</td></tr></table>

[a] These values are model dependent.

[b] An $ℓ$ indicates an $e$ or a $μ$ mode, not a sum over these modes.

[c] Here “anything” means at least one particle observed.

[d] This is a $B(B^0 \to D^{*-} \ell^+ \nu_\ell)$ value.

[e] $D^{**}$ stands for the sum of the $D(1^1P_1)$, $D(1^3P_0)$, $D(1^3P_1)$, $D(2^1S_0)$, and $D(2^1S_1)$ resonances.

[f] The value is for the sum of the charge states or particle/antiparticle states indicated.

[g] $D^{(*)}D^{(*)}$ stands for the sum of $D^{*}D^{*}$, $D^{*}D^{*}$, $D^{*}D^{*}$, and $D^{*}D^{*}$.

[h] $X(3915)$ denotes a near-threshold enhancement in the $\omega J/\psi$ mass spectrum.

[i] Inclusive branching fractions have a multiplicity definition and can be greater than 100%.

## B$^{±}$/B$^{0}$ ADMIXTURE BRANCHING RATIOS

$$ \Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_3 / \Gamma $$

These branching fraction values are model dependent.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.82±0.15 OUR EVALUATION</td><td></td><td></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

10.49±0.20 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.

<table><tr><td>10.34±0.04±0.26</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17B</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>10.28±0.18±0.24</td><td>2 URQUIJO</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>10.91±0.09±0.24</td><td>3 MAHMOOD</td><td>04</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>9.7 ±0.5 ±0.4</td><td>4 ALBRECHT</td><td>93H</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>9.96±0.19±0.32</td><td>5 AUBERT, B</td><td>06Y</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 17B</td></tr><tr><td>10.85±0.21±0.36</td><td>6 OKABE</td><td>05</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by URQUIJO 07</td></tr><tr><td>10.83±0.16±0.06</td><td>7 AUBERT</td><td>04X</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, B 06Y</td></tr><tr><td>10.36±0.06±0.23</td><td>8 AUBERT, B</td><td>04A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>10.87±0.18±0.30</td><td>9 AUBERT</td><td>03</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 04X</td></tr><tr><td>10.90±0.12±0.49</td><td>10 ABE</td><td>02Y</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by OKABE 05</td></tr><tr><td>10.49±0.17±0.43</td><td>11 BARISH</td><td>96B</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by MAHMOOD 04</td></tr><tr><td>10.80±0.20±0.56</td><td>12 HENDERSON</td><td>92</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>10.0 ±0.4 ±0.3</td><td>13 YANAGISAWA</td><td>91</td><td>CSB2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>10.3 ±0.6 ±0.2</td><td>14 ALBRECHT</td><td>90H</td><td>ARG</td><td>Direct e at T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>10.0 ±0.6 ±0.2</td><td>15 ALBRECHT</td><td>90H</td><td>ARG</td><td>Direct μ at T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>11.7 ±0.4 ±1.0</td><td>16 WACHS</td><td>89</td><td>CBAL</td><td>Direct e at T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>12.0 ±0.7 ±0.5</td><td>CHEN</td><td>84</td><td>CLEO</td><td>Direct e at T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>10.8 ±0.6 ±1.0</td><td>CHEN</td><td>84</td><td>CLEO</td><td>Direct μ at T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>11.2 ±0.9 ±1.0</td><td>LEVMAN</td><td>84</td><td>CUSB</td><td>Direct μ at T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>13.2 ±0.8 ±1.4</td><td>17 KLOPFEN...</td><td>83B</td><td>CUSB</td><td>Direct e at T(4S)</td></tr></table>

1 LEES 17B measurement is obtained from semileptonic decays to electrons. The result is averaged over $B^{±}$ and $B^{0}$ mesons, assuming lepton universality.

2 URQUIJO 07 report a measurement of (10.07 ± 0.18 ± 0.21)% for the partial branching fraction of $B \to e\nu_e X\bar{\nu}_e$ decay with electron energy above 0.6 GeV. We converted the result to $B \to e\nu_e X$ branching fraction.

3 Uses charge and angular correlations in $\Gamma(4S)$ events with a high-momentum lepton and an additional electron.

4 ALBRECHT 93H analysis performed using tagged semileptonic decays of the B. This technique is almost model independent for the lepton branching ratio.

5 The measurements are obtained for charged and neutral B mesons partial rates of semileptonic decay to electrons with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c in the B rest frame. The best precision on the ratio is achieved for a momentum threshold of 1.0 GeV: $B(B^+ \to e^+ \nu_e X) / B(B^0 \to e^+ \nu_e X) = 1.074 \pm 0.041 \pm 0.026$.

6 The measurements are obtained for charged and neutral B mesons partial rates of semileptonic decay to electrons with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c in the B rest frame, and their ratio of $B(B^+ \to e^+ \nu_e X)/B(B^0 \to e^+ \nu_e X) = 1.08 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.02$.

7 The semileptonic branching ratio, $|V_{CB}|$ and other heavy-quark parameters are determined from a simultaneous fit to moments of the hadronic-mass and lepton-energy distribution.

8 Uses the high-momentum lepton tag method and requires the electron energy above 0.6 GeV.

9 Uses the high-momentum lepton tag method. They also report $|V_{CB}| = 0.0423 \pm 0.0007(\exp) \pm 0.0020(\text{theo.})$.

10 Uses the high-momentum lepton tag method. ABE 02Y also reports $|V_{CB}| = 0.0408 \pm 0.0010(\exp) \pm 0.0025(\text{theo.})$. The second error is due to uncertainties of theoretical inputs.

11 BARISH 96B analysis performed using tagged semileptonic decays of the B. This technique is almost model independent for the lepton branching ratio.

12 HENDERSON 92 measurement employs $e$ and $\mu$. The systematic error contains 0.004 in quadrature from model dependence. The authors average a variation of the Isgur, Scora, Grinstein, and Wise model with that of the Altarelli-Cabibbo-Corbò-Maiani-Martinelli model for semileptonic decays to correct the acceptance.

13 YANAGISAWA 91 also measures an average semileptonic branching ratio at the $\Gamma(5S)$ of 9.6-10.5% depending on assumptions about the relative production of different B meson species.

14 ALBRECHT 90H uses the model of ALTARELLI 82 to correct over all lepton momenta. 0.099 ± 0.006 is obtained using ISGUR 89B.

15 ALBRECHT 90H uses the model of ALTARELLI 82 to correct over all lepton momenta. 0.097 ± 0.006 is obtained using ISGUR 89B.

16 Using data above $p(e) = 2.4$ GeV, WACHS 89 determine $\sigma(B \to e\nu\bar{\nu})/\sigma(B \to e\nu\bar{\nu}\text{charm}) < 0.065$ at 90% CL.

17 Ratio $\sigma(B \to e\nu\bar{\nu})/\sigma(B \to e\nu\bar{\nu}\text{charm}) < 0.055$ at CL = 90%.

<figure><img src="image_620.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{anything}) / \Gamma(\mu^+ \nu_\mu \text{anything}) \quad \Gamma_1 / \Gamma_2 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.007±0.009±0.019</td><td>1 AGGARWAL</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The accompanying B meson is fully reconstructed in its hadronic decay modes.

$$ \Gamma(D^{-} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{anything}) / \Gamma(\ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{anything}) \quad \Gamma_4 / \Gamma_3 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.26±0.07±0.04</td><td>1 FULTON</td><td>91</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 FULTON 91 uses $B(D^+ \to K^- \pi^+ \pi^+) = (9.1 \pm 1.3 \pm 0.4)\%$ as measured by MARK III.

$$ \Gamma(D^0 \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{anything}) / \Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{anything}) \quad \Gamma_5 / \Gamma_3 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.67±0.09±0.10</td><td>1 FULTON</td><td>91</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 FULTON 91 uses $B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) = (4.2 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.4)\%$ as measured by MARK III.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^{0} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{anything}) / \Gamma(\ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{anything}) \quad \Gamma_6 / \Gamma_3 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.223±0.006±0.009</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>10</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

$$ \Gamma(D^{*-} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_7 / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.67±0.08±0.10</td><td>ABDALLAH</td><td>04D</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z<sup>0</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>0.6 ± 0.3 ± 0.1</th><th>1 BARISH</th><th>95</th><th>CLE2</th><th>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</th></tr></thead></table>

1 BARISH 95 use $B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) = (3.91 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.17)\%$ and $B(D^{*+} \to D^0 \pi^+) = (68.1 \pm 1.0 \pm 1.3)\%$.

$$ \Gamma(D^{*0} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_8 / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>0.6±0.6±0.1</th><th>1 BARISH</th><th>95</th><th>CLE2</th><th>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</th></tr></thead></table>

1 BARISH 95 use $B(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) = (3.91 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.17)\%$, $B(D^{*+} \to D^0 \pi^+) = (68.1 \pm 1.0 \pm 1.3)\%$, $B(D^{*0} \to D^0 \pi^0) = (63.6 \pm 2.3 \pm 3.3)\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^{*} e^{+} \nu_{e}) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^{*} \mu^{+} \nu_{\mu}) \quad \Gamma_{10} / \Gamma_{11} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.993±0.023±0.023</td><td>1 PRIM</td><td>23</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 This is the lepton-flavor universality ratio $R_{e\mu}$ for the $B^+ \to \bar{D}^{*0} \ell^+ \nu_\ell$ and $B^0 \to D^{*-} \ell^+ \nu_\ell$ average.
$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^{**} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{12}/\Gamma $$

$D^{**}$ stands for the sum of the $D(1^1P_1)$, $D(1^3P_0)$, $D(1^3P_1)$, $D(1^3P_2)$, $D(2^1S_0)$, and $D(2^1S_1)$ resonances. $\ell = e$ or $\mu$, not sum over $e$ and $\mu$ modes.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.027±0.005±0.005</td><td></td><td>63</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.028</td><td>95</td><td>2 BARISH</td><td>95</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 ALBRECHT 93 assumes the GISW model to correct for unseen modes. Using the BHKT model, the result becomes 0.023 ± 0.006 ± 0.004. Assumes $B(D^{*+} → D^0π^+) = 68.1\%$, $B(D^0 → K^-π^+) = 3.65\%$, $B(D^0 → K^-π^+π^-π^+) = 7.5\%$. We have taken their average $e$ and $\mu$ value.

2 BARISH 95 uses $B(D^0 → K^-π^+) = (3.91 ± 0.08 ± 0.17)\%$, assume all nonresonant channels are zero, and use GISW model for relative abundances of $D^{**}$ states.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_1(2420) \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{13}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.0038±0.0013 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.4.

<table><tr><td>0.0033±0.0006</td><td></td><td>1 ABAZOV</td><td>050</td><td>D0 p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.0074±0.0016</td><td></td><td>2 BUSKULIC</td><td>97B</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>seen</td><td>3 BUSKULIC</td><td>95B</td><td>Alep Repl. by BUSKULIC 97B</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes $B(D_1 → D^*π) = 1$, $B(D_1 → D^*π^+) = 2/3$, and $B(b → B) = 0.397$.

2 BUSKULIC 97B assumes $B(D_1(2420) → D^*π) = 1$, $B(D_1(2420) → D^*π^+) = 2/3$, and $B(b → B) = 0.378 ± 0.022$.

3 BUSKULIC 95B reports $f_B × B(B → \bar{D}_1(2420)0^{\ell+}ν_\ell \text{ anything}) × B(\bar{D}_1(2420)0^{\ell+} → \bar{D}^*(2010)^-π^+) = (2.04 ± 0.58) × 0.34)10^{-3}$, where $f_B$ is the production fraction for a single B charge state.

$$ \left[ \Gamma(\bar{D} \pi \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{ anything}) + \Gamma(\bar{D}^* \pi \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{ anything}) \right] / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{14}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.026±0.005 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.5.

<table><tr><td>0.0340±0.0052±0.0032</td><td></td><td>1 ABREU</td><td>00R</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.0226±0.0029±0.0033</td><td></td><td>2 BUSKULIC</td><td>97B</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes no contribution from $B_S$ and $b$ baryons. Further assumes contributions from single pion ($D\pi$ and $D^*π$) states only, allowing isospin conservation to relate the relative $\pi^0$ and $\pi^+$ rates.

2 BUSKULIC 97B assumes $B(b → B) = 0.378 ± 0.022$ and uses isospin invariance by assuming that all observed $D^0π^+$, $D^0π^+$, $D^+π^-$, and $D^+π^-$ are from $D^{**}$ states. A correction has been applied to account for the production of $B_S^0$ and $\Lambda_b^0$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D} \pi \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{15}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.0154±0.0061</td><td></td><td>ABREU</td><td>00R</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^* \pi \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{16}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.0186±0.0038</td><td></td><td>ABREU</td><td>00R</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_2^* (2460) \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{17}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>0.0044±0.0016</td><td></td><td>1 ABAZOV</td><td>050</td><td>D0 p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.0065</td><td>95</td><td>2 BUSKULIC</td><td>97B</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

not seen

1 Assumes $B(D_2^* → D^*π^+) = 0.30 ± 0.06$ and $B(b → B) = 0.397$.

2 A revised number based on BUSKULIC 97B which assumes $B(D_2^*(2460) → D^*π^+) = 0.20$ and $B(b → B) = 0.378 ± 0.022$.

3 BUSKULIC 95B reports $f_B × B(B → \bar{D}_2^*(2460)0^{\ell+}ν_\ell \text{ anything}) × B(\bar{D}_2^*(2460)0^{\ell+} → \bar{D}^*(2010)^-π^+) ≤ 0.81 × 10^{-3}$ at CL=95%, where $f_B$ is the production fraction for a single B charge state.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(B \to \bar{D}_2^*(2460) \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{ anything}) \times B(D_2^*(2460) \to D^* \pi^+)}{\Gamma(B \to \bar{D}_1(2420) \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{ anything}) \times B(\bar{D}_1(2420) \to D^* \pi^+)} \quad \Gamma_{18}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.039±0.09±0.12</td><td></td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>050</td><td>D0 p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">p</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D^* - \pi \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{18}/\Gamma $$

Includes resonant and nonresonant contributions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>10.0±2.7±2.1</td><td></td><td>1 BUSKULIC</td><td>95B</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

1 BUSKULIC 95B reports $f_B × B(B → \bar{D}^*(2010)^-π^+\ell^+\nu_\ell \text{ anything}) = (3.7 ± 1.0 ± 0.7)10^{-3}$. Above value assumes $f_B = 0.37 ± 0.03$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\bar{D} \pi \pi^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)}{\Gamma(\bar{D} \ell^+ \nu_\ell)} \quad \Gamma_{19}/\Gamma_6 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>6.7±1.0±0.8</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>16</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 Measurement used electrons and muons as leptons.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\bar{D}^* \pi^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell)}{\Gamma(\bar{D}^* \ell^+ \nu_\ell)} \quad \Gamma_{20}/\Gamma_9 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tr><td>1.9±0.5±0.4</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>16</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

1 Measurement used electrons and muons as leptons.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_S^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{21}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 ALBRECHT 93E reports < 0.012 from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B → D_S^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] × [B(D_S^+ → \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ → \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ → \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 × 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_S^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell K^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{22}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 ALBRECHT 93E reports < 0.008 from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B → D_S^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell K^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] × [B(D_S^+ → \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ → \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ → \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 × 10^{-2}$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}_S^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell K^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{23}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 ALBRECHT 93E reports < 0.012 from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B → D_S^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell K^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] × [B(D_S^+ → \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_S^+ → \phi\pi^+) = 0.027$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_S^+ → \phi\pi^+) = 4.5 × 10^{-2}$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\chi_C \ell^+ \nu_\ell)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{24}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

(Produced by HFLAV)

10.63±0.15 OUR EVALUATION

<table><tr><td>10.18±0.03±0.24</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>10.44±0.19±0.22</td><td></td><td>2 URQUIJO</td><td>07</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>10.64±0.17±0.06</td><td></td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>10A</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 17B</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>10.61±0.16±0.06</td><td></td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>04X</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 10A</td></tr></table>

1 The measurement is obtained from semileptonic decays to electrons $B → Xe\nu$, and using a theoretical model (GAMBINO 07, GAMBINO 11) to predict the contribution from $B → X_u e\nu$. The result is averaged over $B^±$ and $B^0$ mesons, assuming lepton universality.

2 Measured the independent $B^+$ and $B^0$ partial branching fractions with electron energy above 0.4 GeV.

3 Obtained from a combined fit to the moments of observed spectra in inclusive $B → X_c \ell^+\nu_\ell$ decay.

4 The semileptonic branching ratio, $|V_{cb}|$ and other heavy-quark parameters are determined from a simultaneous fit to moments of the hadronic-mass and lepton-energy distribution.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\chi_u \ell^+ \nu_\ell)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{25}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

(Produced by HFLAV)

<table><tr><td>1.85 ± 0.08 ± 0.19</td><td></td><td>1 CAO</td><td>21A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.665 ± 0.087<sup>+1.035</sup><sub>-0.094</sub></td><td></td><td>2 LEES</td><td>17B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.01 ± 0.15 ± 0.25</td><td></td><td>3 LEES</td><td>12R</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.53 ± 0.24 ± 0.24</td><td></td><td>4 AUBERT, B</td><td>05X</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.80 ± 0.52 ± 0.41</td><td></td><td>5 LIMOSANI</td><td>05</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.77 ± 0.29 ± 0.38</td><td></td><td>6 BORNHEIM</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.39 ± 0.14 ± 0.22</td><td></td><td>7 CAO</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.963 ± 0.173 ± 0.159</td><td></td><td>8 URQUIJO</td><td>10</td><td>BELL Repl. by CAO 21A</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.18 ± 0.09 ± 0.07</td><td></td><td>9 AUBERT</td><td>08AS</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 12R</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.27 ± 0.26<sup>+0.37</sup><sub>-0.33</sub></td><td></td><td>10 AUBERT</td><td>06H</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 17B</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.24 ± 0.27 ± 0.47</td><td></td><td>11,12 AUBERT</td><td>04I</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 05X</td></tr></table>

1 Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most inclusive result of the full branching fraction is obtained in the region for lepton energy in B rest frame $E_\ell^+ > 1$ GeV, where the measured partial branching fraction is $\Delta B = (1.59 ± 0.07 ± 0.16) × 10^{-3}$. The acceptance in that region is reported to be 0.86.

2 Obtained from the partial rate $\Delta B = (1.554 ± 0.082^{+0.095}_{-0.086}) × 10^{-3}$ for the electron momentum interval of 0.8-2.7 GeV/c based on GG0U1 method ($\chi_c \ell\nu$, $m_c$ constraint fit of SF parameters).

3 Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most precise result on the full branching fraction is obtained in the region for lepton momentum in B rest frame $p_\ell^+ > 1$ GeV/c, where the measured partial branching fraction is $\Delta B = (1.80 ± 0.13 ± 0.15) × 10^{-3}$. The acceptance in that region is reported in a private communication by the Authors to be 0.894. The corresponding $|V_{ub}|$ from the BLNP method is $(4.28 ± 0.15 ± 0.18 ± 0.19) × 10^{-3}$, where the last uncertainty comes from determined prediction.

4 Determined from the partial rate $\Delta B = (4.41 ± 0.42 ± 0.42) × 10^{-4}$ measured for electron energy > 2 GeV and hadronic mass squared < 3.5 GeV$^2$, and calculated acceptance 0.174 in that region. The $V_{ub}$ is measured as $(4.41 ± 0.30^{+0.65}_{-0.47} ± 0.28) × 10^{-3}$.

5 Uses electrons in the momentum interval 1.9-2.6 GeV/c in the center-of-mass frame. The $V_{ub}$ is found to be $(5.08 ± 0.47^{+0.49}_{-0.48}) × 10^{-3}$.
⁶BORNHEIM 02 uses the observed yield of leptons from semileptonic B decays in the end-point momentum interval 2.2-2.6 GeV/c with recent CLEO-2 data on B → X_sγ. The $V_{ub}$ is found to be (4.08 ± 0.34 ± 0.53) × 10⁻³.

⁷Measurement requires lepton energy $E_e^+ > 1$ GeV in the B rest frame. It is a part of the inclusive and exclusive $|V_{ub}|$ determination.

⁸Uses a multivariate analysis method and requires lepton momentum in the B rest frame, $p_{\ell^+} > 1.0$ GeV/c.

⁹Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most precise result is obtained in the region for hadronic mass $M_X < 1.55$ GeV/c², and is $\Delta B = (1.18 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.07) \times 10^{-3}$. The corresponding $|V_{ub}|$ from the BLNP method is (4.27 ± 0.16 ± 0.13 ± 0.30) × 10⁻³, where the last uncertainty comes from the theoretical prediction of the partial rate in the given phase-space region.

¹⁰Obtained from the partial rate $\Delta B = (0.572 \pm 0.041 \pm 0.065) \times 10^{-3}$ for the electron momentum interval of 2.0-2.6 GeV/c based on BLNP method.

¹¹Used BaBar measurement of Semileptonic branching fraction $B(B \to X \ell \nu_{\ell}) = (10.87 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.30)\%$ to convert the ratio of rates to branching fraction.

¹²The third error includes the systematics and theoretical errors summed in quadrature.

$$ \Gamma(X_u \ell^+ \nu_e) / \Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_e \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{25}/\Gamma $$
$\ell$ denotes $e$ or $\mu$, not the sum. These experiments measure this ratio in very limited momentum intervals.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.06 ± 0.25 ± 0.42</td><td></td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>041</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>107</td><td></td><td></td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>94C</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>77</td><td></td><td></td><td>3 BARTELT</td><td>93B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>41</td><td></td><td></td><td>4 ALBRECHT</td><td>91C</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>76</td><td></td><td></td><td>5 ALBRECHT</td><td>90</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>6 FULTON</td><td>90</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.0</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>7 BEHRENDS</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.0</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>CHEN</td><td>84</td><td>CLEO Direct e at T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5.5</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>KLOPFEN...</td><td>83b</td><td>CUSB Direct e at T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The third error includes the systematics and theoretical errors summed in quadrature.

²ALBRECHT 94C find $\Gamma(b \to c)/\Gamma(b \to all) = 0.99 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.04$.

³BARTELT 93B (CLEO II) measures an excess of 107 ± 15 ± 11 leptons in the lepton momentum interval 2.3-2.6 GeV/c which is attributed to $b \to u \ell \nu_e$. This corresponds to a model-dependent partial branching ratio $\Delta B_{ub}$ between (1.15 ± 0.16 ± 0.15) × 10⁻⁴, as evaluated using the KS model (KOERNER 88), and (1.54 ± 0.22 ± 0.20) × 10⁻⁴ using the ACCMM model (ARTUSO 93). The corresponding values of $|V_{ub}|/|V_{cb}|$ are 0.056 ± 0.006 and 0.076 ± 0.008, respectively.

⁴ALBRECHT 91C result supersedes ALBRECHT 90. Two events are fully reconstructed providing evidence for the $b \to u$ transition. Using the model of ALTARELLI 82, they obtain $|V_{ub}|/|V_{cb}| = 0.11 \pm 0.012$ from 77 leptons in the 2.3-2.6 GeV momentum range.

⁵ALBRECHT 90 observes 41 ± 10 excess e and $\mu$ (lepton) events in the momentum interval $p = 2.3-2.6$ GeV signaling the presence of the $b \to u$ transition. The events correspond to a model-dependent measurement of $|V_{ub}|/|V_{cb}| = 0.10 \pm 0.01$.

⁶FULTON 90 observe 76 ± 20 excess e and $\mu$ (lepton) events in the momentum interval $p = 2.4-2.6$ GeV signaling the presence of the $b \to u$ transition. The average branching ratio, (1.8 ± 0.4 ± 0.3) × 10⁻⁴, corresponds to a model-dependent measurement of approximately $|V_{ub}|/|V_{cb}| = 0.1$ using $B(b \to c \ell \nu) = 10.2 \pm 0.2 \pm 0.7\%$.

⁷The quoted possible limits range from 0.018 to 0.04 for the ratio, depending on which model or momentum limit is chosen. We select the most conservative limit they have calculated. This corresponds to a limit on $|V_{ub}|/|V_{cb}| < 0.20$. While the endpoint technique employed is more robust than their previous results in CHEN 84, these results do not provide a numerical improvement in the limit.

$$ \Gamma(X_u e^+ \nu_e) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{26}/\Gamma $$
Requires $E_e^* > 1$ GeV, where $E_e^* = e^+ e^-$ energy in B rest frame.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.57 ± 0.10 ± 0.16</td><td>1 CAO</td><td>21A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The correlation of 53% with $B(B \to X_u \mu^+ \nu_\mu)$ (lepton energy in B rest frame $E_{\mu^+}^* > 1$ GeV) is reported.

$$ \Gamma(X_u \mu^+ \nu_\mu) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{27}/\Gamma $$
Requires $E_\mu^* > 1$ GeV, where $E_\mu^* = \mu^+ \nu_\mu$ energy in B rest frame.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.62 ± 0.10 ± 0.18</td><td>1 CAO</td><td>21A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The correlation of 53% with $B(B \to X_u e^+ \nu_e)$ (lepton energy in B rest frame $E_{e^+}^* > 1$ GeV) is reported.

$$ \Gamma(K^+ \ell^+ \nu_e \text{ anything}) / \Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_e \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{28}/\Gamma $$
$\ell$ denotes $e$ or $\mu$, not the sum.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.58 ± 0.05</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.594 ± 0.021 ± 0.056</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94C</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.54 ± 0.07 ± 0.06</td><td>1 ALAM</td><td>87B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALAM 87B measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations.

$$ \Gamma(K^- \ell^+ \nu_e \text{ anything}) / \Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_e \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{29}/\Gamma $$
$\ell$ denotes $e$ or $\mu$, not the sum.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.092 ± 0.035</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.086 ± 0.011 ± 0.044</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94C</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.10 ± 0.05 ± 0.02</td><td>1 ALAM</td><td>87B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALAM 87B measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations.

$$ \Gamma(K^0 / \bar{K}^0 \ell^+ \nu_e \text{ anything}) / \Gamma(\ell^+ \nu_e \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{30}/\Gamma $$
$\ell$ denotes $e$ or $\mu$, not the sum. Sum over $K^0$ and $\bar{K}^0$ states.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.42 ± 0.05</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.452 ± 0.038 ± 0.056</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>94C</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.39 ± 0.06 ± 0.04</td><td>2 ALAM</td><td>87B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALBRECHT 94C assume a $K^0/\bar{K}^0$ multiplicity twice that of $K^0_S$.

²ALAM 87B measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^+ \tau^+ \nu_\tau) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^+ \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \qquad \Gamma_{31}/\Gamma_6 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>35 ± 4</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td colspan="2">Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>30.7 ± 3.7 ± 1.6</td><td>1 CARIA</td><td>20</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>37.5 ± 6.4 ± 2.6</td><td>2,3 HUSCHLE</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>44.0 ± 5.8 ± 4.2</td><td>2,3 LEES</td><td>12D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.16 ± 11.7 ± 5.2</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08N</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 12D</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The tag-side B meson is reconstructed in a semileptonic decay mode and the signal-side $\tau$ is reconstructed in a purely leptonic decay. The Belle combination of HUSCHLE 15 and CARIA 20 yields $R(D) = (32.6 \pm 3.4) \times 10^{-2}$.

²Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

³Uses $\tau^+ \to e^+ \nu_e \bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $\tau^+ \to \mu^+ \nu_\mu \bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $e^+ \to \mu^+$ as $\ell^+$. Obtained from simultaneous fit to B+ and B0 assuming isospin symmetry.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^* \tau^+ \nu_\tau) / \Gamma(\bar{D}^* \ell^+ \nu_\ell) \qquad \Gamma_{32}/\Gamma_9 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>28.2 ± 1.2</td><td>OUR EVALUATION</td><td colspan="2">(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr><tr><td>29.3 ± 1.4</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td colspan="2"></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>28.1 ± 1.8 ± 2.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AR</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>28.3 ± 1.8 ± 1.4</td><td>2 CARIA</td><td>20</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>27.0 ± 3.5<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-2.5</sub></td><td>3 HIROSE</td><td>17</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>29.3 ± 3.8 ± 1.5</td><td>4 HUSCHLE</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>33.2 ± 2.4 ± 1.8</td><td>4 LEES</td><td>12D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>29.7 ± 5.6 ± 1.8</td><td>5 AUBERT</td><td>08N</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 12D</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.98 ± 0.16 ± 0.12</td><td>2 ALAM</td><td>87B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $\tau^+ \to \mu^+ \nu_\mu \bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $\mu^+$ as $\ell^+$. The measurement combines fully reconstructed $D^+$ and sample with sample where only $D^0$ from $D^*$ decays is reconstructed.

²The tag-side B meson is reconstructed in a semileptonic decay mode and the signal-side $\tau$ is reconstructed in a purely leptonic decay. The Belle combination of HUSCHLE 15, HIROSE 17, and CARIA 20 yields $R(D^*) = 0.238 \pm 0.018$.

³Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

⁴Uses $\tau^+ \to e^+ \nu_e \bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $\tau^+ \to \mu^+ \nu_\mu \bar{\nu}_\tau$ and $e^+ \to \mu^+$ as $\ell^+$. Obtained from simultaneous fit to B+ and B0 assuming isospin symmetry. Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.

⁵Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side. The results are normalized to the $B^+$ decay rate.

$$ \langle n_c \rangle \qquad \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{33}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.10 ± 0.05</td><td>1 GIBBONS</td><td>97B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.98 ± 0.16 ± 0.12</td><td>2 ALAM</td><td>87B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹GIBBONS 97B from charm counting using $B(D^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$ and $B(\Lambda^+ \to pK^- \pi^+) = 0.044 \pm 0.006$.

²From the difference between $K^-$ and $K^+$ widths. ALAM 87B measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It does not consider the possibility of $B\bar{B}$ mixing. We have thus removed it from the average.

$$ \Gamma(D^{\pm} \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{33}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.230 ± 0.012 ± 0.004</td><td>1 GIBBONS</td><td>97B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.241 ± 0.037 ± 0.004</td><td>2 BORTOLETTO92</td><td>97B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.223 ± 0.051 ± 0.004</td><td>3 ALBRECHT</td><td>91H</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹GIBBONS 97B reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^{\pm} \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+)] = 0.0216 \pm 0.0008 \pm 0.00082$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+) = (9.38 \pm 0.16) \times 10^{-2}$.

²BORTOLETTO 92 reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^{\pm} \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+)] = 0.0226 \pm 0.0030 \pm 0.0018$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+) = (9.38 \pm 0.16) \times 10^{-2}$.

³ALBRECHT 91H reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^{\pm} \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+)] = 0.0209 \pm 0.0027 \pm 0.0040$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+) = (9.38 \pm 0.16) \times 10^{-2}$.

⁴BORTOLETTO 87 reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^{\pm} \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+)] = 0.019 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.002$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^+ \to K^- 2\pi^+) = (9.38 \pm 0.16) \times 10^{-2}$.
$$ \Gamma(D^0/\bar{D}^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{34}/\Gamma $$

VALUE EVTS

0.646 ±0.021 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.

0.6663 ±0.0004 ±0.0177

ZHUKOVA 23 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.636 ±0.024 ±0.005

1 GIBBONS 97B CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.590 ±0.047 ±0.004

2 BORTOLETTO92 CLEO $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.492 ±0.074 ±0.004

3 ALBRECHT 91H ARG $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.532 ±0.065 ±0.004 21k

4 BORTOLETTO87 CLEO $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.608 ±0.183 ±0.005

5 GREEN 83 CLEO Repl. by BORTOLETTO87

1 GIBBONS 97B reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^0/\bar{D}^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)] = 0.0251 \pm 0.0006 \pm 0.00075$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = (3.947 \pm 0.030) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 BORTOLETTO 92 reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^0/\bar{D}^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)] = 0.0233 \pm 0.0012 \pm 0.0014$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = (3.947 \pm 0.030) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3 ALBRECHT 91H reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^0/\bar{D}^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)] = 0.0194 \pm 0.0015 \pm 0.0025$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = (3.947 \pm 0.030) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

4 BORTOLETTO 87 reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^0/\bar{D}^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)] = 0.0210 \pm 0.0015 \pm 0.0021$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = (3.947 \pm 0.030) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

5 GREEN 83 reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^0/\bar{D}^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+)] = 0.0246 \pm 0.006 \pm 0.004$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^0 \to K^-\pi^+) = (3.947 \pm 0.030) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.646±0.021 (Error scaled by 1.5)

<figure><img src="image_621.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(D^{-} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{D}^{0} \ell^{+} \nu_{\ell} \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{4}/\Gamma_{5} $$

VALUE EVTS

0.359 ±0.006 ±0.009

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAJ1 19AD LHCB pp at 13 TeV

1 AAJ1 19AD uses $D^0 \to K^-\pi^+$ and $D^+ \to K^-\pi^+\pi^+$ modes.

$$ \Gamma(D^{*}(2010)^{\pm} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{35}/\Gamma $$

VALUE EVTS

0.225 ±0.015 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.247 ±0.019 ±0.01

1 GIBBONS 97B CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.205 ±0.019 ±0.007

2 ALBRECHT 96D ARG $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.230 ±0.028 ±0.009

3 BORTOLETTO92 CLEO $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.283 ±0.053 ±0.002

4 ALBRECHT 91H ARG Sup. by ALBRECHT 96D

0.22 ±0.04 ±0.07

5 BORTOLETTO87 CLEO $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.27 ±0.06 ±0.08

6 CSORNA 85 CLEO Repl. by BORTOLETTO 87

1 GIBBONS 97B reports $B(B \to D^{*}(2010)^{+} \text{ anything}) = 0.239 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.009$ using CLEO measured $D$ and $D^*$ branching fractions. We rescale to our PDG 96 values of $D$ and $D^*$ branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 ALBRECHT 96D reports $B(B \to D^{*}(2010)^{+} \text{ anything}) = 0.196 \pm 0.019$ using CLEO measured $B(D^{*}(2010)^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}) = 0.681 \pm 0.01 \pm 0.013$, $B(D^{0} \to K^{-}\pi^{+}) = 0.0401 \pm 0.0014$, $B(D^{0} \to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}) = 0.081 \pm 0.005$. We rescale to our PDG 96 values of $D$ and $D^*$ branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3 BORTOLETTO 92 reports $B(B \to D^{*}(2010)^{+} \text{ anything}) = 0.25 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.04$ using MARK II $B(D^{*}(2010)^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}) = 0.57 \pm 0.06$ and $B(D^{0} \to K^{-}\pi^{+}) = 0.042 \pm 0.008$.

We rescale to our PDG 96 values of $D$ and $D^*$ branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

4 ALBRECHT 91H reports $0.348 \pm 0.060 \pm 0.035$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B \to D^{*}(2010)^{+} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^{*}(2010)^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D^{*}(2010)^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}) = 0.55 \pm 0.04$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^{*}(2010)^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}) = (67.4 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Uses the PDG 90 $B(D^{0} \to K^{-}\pi^{+}) = 0.0371 \pm 0.0025$.

5 BORTOLETTO 87 uses old MARK III (BALTRUSAITIS 86E) branching ratios $B(D^{0} \to K^{-}\pi^{+}) = 0.056 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.003$ and also assumes $B(D^{*}(2010)^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}) = 0.60 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.15$. The product branching ratio for $B(B \to D^{*}(2010)^{+}) \times B(D^{*}(2010)^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+})$ is $0.13 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.012$. Superseded by BORTOLETTO 92.

6 V-A momentum spectrum used to extrapolate below $p = 1$ GeV. We correct the value assuming $B(D^{0} \to K^{-}\pi^{+}) = 0.042 \pm 0.006$ and $B(D^{*+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}) = 0.6 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.15$. The product branching fraction is $B(B \to D^{*+}X) \times B(D^{*+} \to \pi^{+}D^{0}) \times B(D^{0} \to K^{-}\pi^{+}) = (68 \pm 15 \pm 9) \times 10^{-4}$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^{*}(2007)^{0} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{36}/\Gamma $$

VALUE EVTS

0.260 ±0.023 ±0.015

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 GIBBONS 97B CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

1 GIBBONS 97B reports $B(B \to D^{*}(2007)^{0} \text{ anything}) = 0.247 \pm 0.012 \pm 0.018 \pm 0.018$ using CLEO measured $D$ and $D^*$ branching fractions. We rescale to our PDG 96 values of $D$ and $D^*$ branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D^{\pm}_{S} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{37}/\Gamma $$

VALUE EVTS

0.106 ±0.006 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

Error includes scale factor of 1.7. See the ideogram below.

0.1128 ±0.0003 ±0.0043

ZHUKOVA 23 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.089 ±0.010 ±0.008

1 ARTUSO 05B CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(5S)$

0.087 ±0.005 ±0.008

2 AUBERT 02G BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.065 ±0.011 ±0.006

3 ALBRECHT 92G ARG $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.068 ±0.010 ±0.006 257

4 BORTOLETTO90 CLEO $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

0.085 ±0.022 ±0.008

5 HAAS 86 CLEO $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.094 ±0.007 ±0.008

6 GIBAUT 96 CLE2 Repl. by ARTUSO 05B

0.094 ±0.024 ±0.008

7 ALBRECHT 87H ARG $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.106±0.006 (Error scaled by 1.7)

<figure><img src="image_622.png" /></figure>

1 ARTUSO 05B reports $0.0905 \pm 0.0025 \pm 0.0140$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B \to D^{\pm}_{S} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^{\pm}_{S} \to \phi\pi^{+})]$ assuming $B(D^{\pm}_{S} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = (4.4 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D^{\pm}_{S} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 AUBERT 02G reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^{\pm}_{S} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^{\pm}_{S} \to \phi\pi^{+})] = 0.00393 \pm 0.00007 \pm 0.00021$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^{\pm}_{S} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3 ALBRECHT 92G reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^{\pm}_{S} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^{\pm}_{S} \to \phi\pi^{+})] = 0.00292 \pm 0.00039 \pm 0.00031$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^{\pm}_{S} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

4 BORTOLETTO 90 reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^{\pm}_{S} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^{\pm}_{S} \to \phi\pi^{+})] = 0.00306 \pm 0.00047$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^{\pm}_{S} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

5 HAAS 86 reports $[\Gamma(B \to D^{\pm}_{S} \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D^{\pm}_{S} \to \phi\pi^{+})] = 0.0038 \pm 0.0010$ which we divide by our best value $B(D^{\pm}_{S} \to \phi\pi^{+}) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.
$\Gamma(\psi(2S)\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTs</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.00307 ± 0.00021</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.00297 ± 0.00020 ± 0.00020</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03F</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.00316 ± 0.00014 ± 0.00028</td><td></td><td>1 ANDERSON</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.0046 ± 0.0017 ± 0.0011</td><td>8</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>87D</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.0034 ± 0.0004 ± 0.0003</td><td>240</td><td>2 BALEST</td><td>95B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Also reports the measurement of $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \ell^+\ell^-$ polarization produced directly from B decay.

²BALEST 95B assume PDG 1994 values for sub mode branching ratios. They find $B(B \rightarrow \psi(2S)X, \psi(2S) \rightarrow \ell^+\ell^-) = 0.30 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.04$ and $B(B \rightarrow \psi(2S)X, \psi(2S) \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-) = 0.37 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.05$. Weighted average is quoted for $B(B \rightarrow \psi(2S)X)$.

$\Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTs</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>3.55 ± 0.27</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>3.33 ± 0.05 ± 0.24</td><td></td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.67 ± 0.35 ± 0.44</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03F</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.35 ± 0.29 ± 0.40</td><td></td><td>ANDERSON</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>3.63 ± 0.22 ± 0.34</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>02L</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by BHARDWAJ 16</td></tr><tr><td>3.30 ± 0.35 ± 0.12</td><td>3 CHEN</td><td>01</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.0 ± 0.6 ± 0.4</td><td>4 BALEST</td><td>95B</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by CHEN 01</td></tr><tr><td>10.5 ± 3.5 ± 2.5</td><td>5 ALBRECHT</td><td>92E</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²ABE 02L uses PDG 01 values for $B(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \ell^+\ell^-)$ and $B(\chi_{c1,c2} \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)\gamma)$.

³CHEN 01 reports $0.00414 \pm 0.00031 \pm 0.00040$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B \rightarrow \chi_{c1}(1P)\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(1S))]$ assuming $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = 0.273 \pm 0.016$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (34.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁴BALEST 95B assume $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)\gamma) = (27.3 \pm 1.6) \times 10^{-2}$, the PDG 1994 value. Fit to $\psi$-photon invariant mass distribution allows for a $\chi_{c1}(1P)$ and a $\chi_{c2}(1P)$ component.

⁵ALBRECHT 92E assumes no $\chi_{c2}(1P)$ production.

<figure><img src="image_623.png" /></figure>

$\Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)(\text{direct})\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>3.08 ± 0.19</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>3.03 ± 0.05 ± 0.24</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.41 ± 0.35 ± 0.42</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03F</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.1 ± 0.4 ± 0.1</td><td>2 CHEN</td><td>01</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>3.32 ± 0.22 ± 0.34</td><td>3 ABE</td><td>02L</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by BHARDWAJ 16</td></tr><tr><td>3.7 ± 0.7</td><td>4 BALEST</td><td>95B</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by CHEN 01</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²CHEN 01 reports $0.00383 \pm 0.00031 \pm 0.00040$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B \rightarrow \chi_{c1}(1P)(\text{direct})\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(1S))]$ assuming $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = 0.273 \pm 0.016$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (34.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³ABE 02L uses PDG 01 values for $B(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \ell^+\ell^-)$ and $B(\chi_{c1,c2} \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)\gamma)$.

⁴BALEST 95B assume PDG 1994 values. $J/\psi(1S)$ mesons are reconstructed in the $e^+e^-$ and $\mu^+\mu^-$ modes. The $B \rightarrow \chi_{c1}(1P)\text{X}$ branching ratio contains $\chi_{c1}(1P)$ mesons directly from B decays and also from feeddown through $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \chi_{c1}(1P)\gamma$. Using the measured inclusive rates, BALEST 95B corrects for the feeddown and finds the $B \rightarrow \chi_{c1}(1P)(\text{direct})\text{X}$ branching ratio.

$\Gamma(\chi_{c2}(1P)\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>9.9 ± 1.7</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>9.8 ± 0.6 ± 1.0</td><td></td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>21.0 ± 4.5 ± 3.1</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03F</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>6.8 ± 3.4 ± 0.3</td><td></td><td>2 CHEN</td><td>01</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>18.0<sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-2.8</sub> ± 2.6</td><td>3 ABE</td><td>02L</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by BHARDWAJ 16</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;38</td><td>90</td><td>4 BALEST</td><td>95B</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by CHEN 01</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²CHEN 01 reports $(9.8 \pm 4.8 \pm 1.5) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B \rightarrow \chi_{c2}(1P)\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c2}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(1S))]$ assuming $B(\chi_{c2}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = 0.135 \pm 0.011$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\chi_{c2}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (19.5 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³ABE 02L uses PDG 01 values for $B(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \ell^+\ell^-)$ and $B(\chi_{c1,c2} \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)\gamma)$.

⁴BALEST 95B assume $B(\chi_{c2}(1P) \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)\gamma) = (13.5 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-2}$, the PDG 1994 value. $J/\psi(1S)$ mesons are reconstructed in the $e^+e^-$ and $\mu^+\mu^-$ modes, and PDG 1994 branching fractions are used. If interpreted as signal, the $35 \pm 13$ events correspond to $B(B \rightarrow \chi_{c2}(1P)X) = (0.25 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.03) \times 10^{-2}$.

<figure><img src="image_624.png" /></figure>

$\Gamma(\chi_{c2}(1P)(\text{direct})\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>0.75 ± 0.11</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.70 ± 0.06 ± 0.10</td><td></td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.90 ± 0.45 ± 0.29</td><td></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03F</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.53<sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.28</sub> ± 0.27</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>02L</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by BHARDWAJ 16</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²ABE 02L uses PDG 01 values for $B(J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \ell^+\ell^-)$ and $B(\chi_{c1,c2} \rightarrow J/\psi(1S)\gamma)$.

$\Gamma(\eta_c(1S)\text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.009</td><td>90</td><td>1 BALEST</td><td>95B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BALEST 95B assume PDG 1994 values for sub mode branching ratios. $J/\psi(1S)$ mesons are reconstructed in $J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow e^+e^-$ and $J/\psi(1S) \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-$. Search region 2960 $<m\eta_c(1S) < 3010$ MeV/c$^2$.

$\Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>2.5 ± 0.9</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>2.4 ± 0.7 ± 0.8</td><td></td><td>1 AUSHEV</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.7<sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-1.0</sub> ± 1.3</td><td></td><td>2,3 GOKHROO</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUSHEV 10 reports $[\Gamma(B \rightarrow \kappa\chi_{c1}(3872))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \rightarrow \bar{D}^0\bar{D}^0\pi^0)] = (0.80 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{-4}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \rightarrow \bar{D}^0\bar{D}^0\pi^0) = (34 \pm 12) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²GOKHROO 06 reports $[\Gamma(B \rightarrow \kappa\chi_{c1}(3872))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \rightarrow D^0\bar{D}^0\pi^0)] = (1.22 \pm 0.31)^{+0.23}_{-0.30} \times 10^{-4}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(3872) \rightarrow D^0\bar{D}^0\pi^0) = (45 \pm 21) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³Measure the near-threshold enhancements in the $(D^0\bar{D}^0\pi^0)$ system at a mass 3875.2 $\pm 0.7^{+0.3}_{-1.6}$ MeV/c$^2$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B$^{±}$/B$^{0}$ ADMIXTURE

### Γ(KX(3940), X → D*0 D0))/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;0.67</strong></td><td>90</td><td>AUSHEV</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ(Kχc0(3915), χc0 → ωJ/ψ)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>7.1 ±1.3 ±3.1</strong></td><td>1</td><td>CHOI</td><td>05</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. CHOI 05 reports the observation of a near-threshold enhancement in the ωJ/ψ mass spectrum in exclusive B → KωJ/ψ. The new state, denoted as χc0(3915), is measured to have a mass of 3943 ± 11 ± 13 GeV/c² and a width Γ = 87 ± 22 ± 26 MeV.

### Γ(K$^{±}$anything)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.789 ±0.025</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.82 ±0.01 ±0.05</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94C</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.775 ±0.015 ±0.025</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>93i</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.85 ±0.07 ±0.09</td><td>ALAM</td><td>87B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

seen

2 BRODY 82 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

seen

3 GIANNINI 82 CUSB e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

1. ALBRECHT 93i value is not independent of the sum of B → K$^{+}$ anything and B → K$^{-}$ anything ALBRECHT 94c values.

2. Assuming Υ(4S) → B$^{0}$, a total of 3.38 ± 0.34 ± 0.68 kaons per Υ(4S) decay is found (the second error is systematic). In the context of the standard B-decay model, this leads to a value for (b-quark)/ (b-quark → all) of 1.09 ± 0.33 ± 0.13.

3. GIANNINI 82 at CESR-CUSB observed 1.58 ± 0.35 K$^{0}$ per hadronic event much higher than 0.82 ± 0.10 below threshold. Consistent with predominant b → cX decay.

### Γ(K$^{+}$anything)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.66 ±0.05</strong></td><td>1</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94C ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.620 ±0.013 ±0.038</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>94C ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.66 ±0.05 ±0.07</td><td>2 ALAM</td><td>87B CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It is for the weak decay vertex and does not include mixing of the neutral B meson. Mixing effects were corrected for by assuming a mixing parameter r of (18.1 ± 4.3)%.

2. Measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It includes production through mixing of the neutral B meson.

### Γ(K$^{−}$anything)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.13 ±0.04</strong></td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>94C ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.165 ±0.011 ±0.036</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>94C ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.19 ±0.05 ±0.02</td><td>2 ALAM</td><td>87B CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It is for the weak decay vertex and does not include mixing of the neutral B meson. Mixing effects were corrected for by assuming a mixing parameter r of (18.1 ± 4.3)%.

2. Measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It includes production through mixing of the neutral B meson.

### Γ(K$^{0}$/R$^{0}$anything)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.64 ±0.04</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.642 ±0.010 ±0.042</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>94C ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.63 ±0.06 ±0.06</td><td>ALAM</td><td>87B CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. ALBRECHT 94c assume a K$^{0}$/R$^{0}$ multiplicity twice that of K$^{0}$S.

### Γ(K*(892)$^{±}$anything)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.182 ±0.054 ±0.024</strong></td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94J</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ(K*(892)$^{0}$/R*(892)$^{0}$anything)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.146 ±0.016 ±0.020</strong></td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94J</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ(K*(892)γ)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>4.24 ±0.54 ±0.32</strong></td><td></td><td>1</td><td>COAN</td><td>00 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<150

2 LESIAK 92 CBAL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

<24

3 ALBRECHT 88H ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)

1. An average of B(B$^{+}$ → K*(892)$^{+}$γ) and B(B$^{0}$ → K*(892)$^{0}$γ) measurements reported in COAN 00 by assuming full correlated systematic errors.

2. LESIAK 92 set a limit on the inclusive process B(b → sγ) < 2.8 × 10$^{-3}$ at 90% CL for the range of masses of 892–2045 MeV, independent of assumptions about s-quark hadronization.

### Γ(ηKγ)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>8.5 ±1.3 ±1.2</strong></td><td>1</td><td>NISHIDA</td><td>05 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. $m_{ηK}$ < 2.4 GeV/c²

### Γ(K1(1400)γ)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;12.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>COAN</td><td>00 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1.6 × 10$^{-3}$ 90 2 LESIAK 92 CBAL e$^{+}$e$^{-}$ → Υ(4S)

<4.1 × 10$^{-4}$ 90 ALBRECHT 88H ARG e$^{+}$e$^{-}$ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the Υ(4S).

2. LESIAK 92 set a limit on the inclusive process B(b → sγ) < 2.8 × 10$^{-3}$ at 90% CL for the range of masses of 892–2045 MeV, independent of assumptions about s-quark hadronization.

### Γ(K$_{2}$(1430)γ)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.66 ±0.59</strong></td><td><strong>0.53</strong></td><td>1</td><td>COAN</td><td>00 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<83 90 ALBRECHT 88H ARG e$^{+}$e$^{-}$ → Υ(4S)

1. COAN 00 obtains a fitted signal yield of 15.9$^{+5.7}_{-5.2}$ events. A search for contamination by K*(1410) yielded a rate consistent with 0; the central value assumes no contamination.

### Γ(K$_{2}$(1770)γ)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>-3</sup></strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LESIAK</td><td>92 BCBAL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. LESIAK 92 set a limit on the inclusive process B(b → sγ) < 2.8 × 10$^{-3}$ at 90% CL for the range of masses of 892–2045 MeV, independent of assumptions about s-quark hadronization.

### Γ(K$_{3}$(1780)γ)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;3.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup></strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>NISHIDA</td><td>05 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<3.0 × 10$^{-3}$ 90 ALBRECHT 88H ARG e$^{+}$e$^{-}$ → Υ(4S)

1. Uses B(K$_{3}^{*}$(1780) → ηK) = 0.11$^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$.

### Γ(K$_{4}$(2045)γ)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;1.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LESIAK</td><td>92 CBAL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. LESIAK 92 set a limit on the inclusive process B(b → sγ) < 2.8 × 10$^{-3}$ at 90% CL for the range of masses of 892–2045 MeV, independent of assumptions about s-quark hadronization.

### Γ(Kγ'(958))/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>(8.3 ±0.9</strong></td><td><strong>0.8 ±0.7)</strong></td><td>1</td><td>RICHICHI</td><td>00 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(K*(892)γ'(958))/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>4.1 ±1.0</strong></td><td><strong>0.9 ±0.5</strong></td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07E BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<22 90 1 RICHICHI 00 CLE2 e$^{+}$e$^{-}$ → Υ(4S)

1. Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(Kη)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;5.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup></strong></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>RICHICHI</td><td>00 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(K*(892)γ)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>(1.80 ±0.49</strong></td><td><strong>0.43 ±0.18)</strong></td><td>1</td><td>RICHICHI</td><td>00 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(Kφφ)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2.3 ±0.8</strong></td><td><strong>0.3</strong></td><td>1</td><td>HUANG</td><td>03 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Assumes equal production of charged and neutral B meson pairs and isospin symmetry.

### Γ(δ → Φγ)/Γtotal

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>3.49 ±0.19</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.75 ±0.18 ±0.35</td><td>1,2 SAITO</td><td>15 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.52 ±0.20 ±0.51</td><td>1,3 LEES</td><td>12U BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.32 ±0.16 ±0.31</td><td>1,4 LEES</td><td>12V BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.47 ±0.15 ±0.40</td><td>1,5 LIMOSANI</td><td>09 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.90 ±0.91 ±0.64</td><td>1,6 AUBERT</td><td>08O BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.29 ±0.44 ±0.29</td><td>1,7 CHEN</td><td>01C CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$2.30 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.30$

$^8\text{DEL-AMO-SA...10M}$ BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

$4.3 \pm 0.3 \pm 0.7$

$^9\text{AUBERT}$ 09U BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10M

$3.92 \pm 0.31 \pm 0.47$

$^{1,10}\text{AUBERT,BE}$ 06B BABR Repl. by LEES 12V

$3.49 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.59$

$^{1,11}\text{AUBERT,B}$ 05R BABR Repl. by LEES 12U

$3.50 \pm 0.32 \pm 0.31$

$^{1,12}\text{KOPPENBURG04}$ BELL Repl. by LIMOSANI 09

$3.36 \pm 0.53 \pm 0.65$

$^{13}\text{ABE}$ 01F BELL Repl. by SAITO 15

$2.32 \pm 0.57 \pm 0.35$

$\text{ALAM}$ 95 CLE2 Repl. by CHEN 01C

1 We extrapolate the measured value to $E_γ > 1.6$ GeV using the method of BUCHMUELLER 06 (average of three theoretical models).

2 SAITO 15 measured $(3.51 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.33) \times 10^{-4}$ using a sum-of-exclusive approach in which 38 of the hadronic final states with $m_{X_S} < 2.8$ GeV/c$^2$ are reconstructed. The cut of minimum photon energy is $E_γ > 1.9$ GeV.

3 Reports $(3.29 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.48) \times 10^{-4}$ for $E_γ > 1.9$ GeV.

4 Reports $(3.21 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.08) \times 10^{-4}$ for $1.8 < E_γ < 2.8$ GeV, where the last systematic uncertainty is for model dependency. Results with other cutoffs are also reported.

5 The measurement reported is $(3.45 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.40) \times 10^{-4}$ for $E_γ > 1.7$ GeV.

6 Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side. The measurement reported is $(3.66 \pm 0.85 \pm 0.60) \times 10^{-4}$ for $E_γ > 1.9$ GeV.

7 The measurement reported is $(3.21 \pm 0.43^{+0.32}_{-0.29}) \times 10^{-4}$ for $E_γ > 2.0$ GeV.

8 Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states $B \to X_{d(s)}\gamma$ where $X_{d(s)}$ is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.5-2.0 GeV/c$^2$.

9 Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states $B \to X_{d(s)}\gamma$ where $X_{d(s)}$ is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.6-1.8 GeV/c$^2$.

10 The measurement reported is $(3.67 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.45) \times 10^{-4}$ for $E_γ > 1.9$ GeV.

11 The measurement reported is $(3.27 \pm 0.18^{+0.55}_{-0.42}) \times 10^{-4}$ for $E_γ > 1.9$ GeV.

12 The measurement reported is $(3.55 \pm 0.32 \pm 0.32) \times 10^{-4}$ for $E_γ > 1.8$ GeV.

13 ABE 01F reports their systematic errors $(\pm 0.42^{+0.50}_{-0.54}) \times 10^{-4}$, where the second error is due to the theoretical uncertainty. We combine them in quadrature.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{b} \to \bar{d}\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{82}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.2±2.0±2.3</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA...10M</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$14 \pm 5 \pm 4$ $^2$AUBERT 09U BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10M

1 Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states $B \to X_{d(s)}\gamma$ where $X_{d(s)}$ is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.5-2.0 GeV/c$^2$.

2 Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states $B \to X_{d(s)}\gamma$ where $X_{d(s)}$ is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.6-1.8 GeV/c$^2$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{b} \to \bar{d}\gamma)/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \bar{s}\gamma) \qquad \Gamma_{82}/\Gamma_{81} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.040±0.009±0.010</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA...10M</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$0.033 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.009$ $^2$AUBERT 09U BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10M

1 Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states $B \to X_{d(s)}\gamma$ where $X_{d(s)}$ is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.5-2.0 GeV/c$^2$.

2 Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states $B \to X_{d(s)}\gamma$ where $X_{d(s)}$ is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.6-1.8 GeV/c$^2$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{b} \to \bar{s}gluon)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{83}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><u>&lt;0.068</u></td><td>90</td><td></td><td>1 COAN</td><td>98</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$<0.08$ $^2$ALBRECHT 95D ARG $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

1 COAN 98 uses D-$\ell$ correlation.

2 ALBRECHT 95D use full reconstruction of one B decay as tag. Two candidate events for charmless B decay can be interpreted as either $b \to sgluon$ or $b \to u$ transition. If interpreted as $b \to sgluon$ they find a branching ratio of ~0.026 or the upper limit quoted above. Result is highly model dependent.

$$ \Gamma(\eta \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{84}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.61±0.30<sup>+0.44</sup><sub>-0.74</sub></td><td></td><td>1 NISHIMURA</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$1.69 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.36$ $^2$NISHIMURA 10 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

$<4.4$ $^3$BROWDER 98 CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

1 Uses $B \to \eta X_S$ with $0.4 < m_{X_S} < 2.6$ GeV/c$^2$.

2 Uses $B \to \eta X_S$ with $1.8 < m_{X_S} < 2.6$ GeV/c$^2$.

3 BROWDER 98 search for high momentum $B \to \eta X_S$ between 2.1 and 2.7 GeV/c.

$$ \Gamma(\eta' \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{85}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

4.2±0.9 OUR AVERAGE

$3.9 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.9$

$^1$AUBERT,B 04F BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

$4.6 \pm 1.1 \pm 0.6$

$^2$BONVICINI 03 CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$6.2 \pm 1.6 \pm 1.3$

$^3$BROWDER 98 CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

1 AUBERT,B 04F reports branching ratio $B \to \eta' X_S$ for high momentum $\eta'$ between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c in the $\Upsilon(45)$ center-of-mass frame. $X_S$ represents a recoil system consisting of a kaon and zero to four pions.

2 BONVICINI 03 observed a signal of $61.2 \pm 13.9$ events in $B \to \eta' X_{nc}$ production for high momentum $\eta'$ between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c in the $\Upsilon(45)$ center-of-mass frame. The $X_{nc}$ denotes "charmless" hadronic states recoiling against $\eta'$. The second error combines systematic and background subtraction uncertainties in quadrature.

3 BROWDER 98 observed a signal of $39.0 \pm 11.6$ events in high momentum $B \to \eta' X_S$ production between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c. The branching fraction is based on the interpretation of $b \to sg$, where the last error includes additional uncertainties due to the color-suppressed $b \to$ backgrounds.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{K}^+ \text{ gluon (charmless)})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{86}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><u>&lt;1.87</u></td><td>90</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA...11</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$1 B \to \bar{K}^+ X$ with $m_X < 1.69$ GeV/c$^2$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{K}^0 \text{ gluon (charmless)})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{87}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.95<sup>+0.51</sup><sub>-0.45</sub>±0.50</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA...11</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$1 B \to \bar{K}^0 X$ with $m_X < 1.69$ GeV/c$^2$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{88}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.39±0.25 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

$1.73^{+0.34}_{-0.32} \pm 0.17$

$^{1,2}$AUBERT 08BH BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

$1.21^{+0.24}_{-0.22} \pm 0.12$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$1.36^{+0.29}_{-0.27} \pm 0.10$

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(45)$.

2 Assumes $\Gamma(B \to \rho\gamma) = \Gamma(B^+ \to \rho^+\gamma) = 2\Gamma(B^0 \to \rho^0\gamma)$ and uses lifetime ratio of $\tau B^+/\tau B^0 = 1.071 \pm 0.009$.

3 Assumes $\Gamma(B \to \rho\gamma) = \Gamma(B^+ \to \rho^+\gamma) = 2\Gamma(B^0 \to \rho^0\gamma)$ and uses lifetime ratio of $\tau B^+/\tau B^0 = 1.083 \pm 0.017$.

4 COAN 00 reports $B(B \to \rho\gamma)/B(B \to K^*(892)\gamma) < 0.32$ at 90%CL and scaled by the central value of $B(B \to K^*(892)\gamma) = (4.24 \pm 0.54 \pm 0.32) \times 10^{-5}$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\gamma)/\Gamma(\bar{K}^*(892)\gamma) \qquad \Gamma_{88}/\Gamma_{69} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.02<sup>+0.60</sup><sub>-0.55</sub>±0.26</td><td>08 BELL</td><td></td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\rho/\omega\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{89}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.30±0.23 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

$1.63^{+0.30}_{-0.28} \pm 0.16$

$^{1,2,3}$AUBERT 08BH BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(45)$

$1.14 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.10$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$1.25^{+0.25}_{-0.24} \pm 0.09$

1 Assumes $\Gamma(B \to \rho\gamma) = \Gamma(B^+ \to \rho^+\gamma) = 2\Gamma(B^0 \to \rho^0\gamma)$ and uses lifetime ratio of $\tau B^+/\tau B^0 = 1.071 \pm 0.009$.

2 Also reports $|V_{td}/V_{ts}| = 0.233^{+0.025}_{-0.024} \pm 0.022$.

3 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(45)$.

4 Assumes $\Gamma(B \to \rho\gamma) = \Gamma(B^+ \to \rho^+\gamma) = 2\Gamma(B^0 \to \rho^0\gamma)$ and uses lifetime ratio of $\tau B^+/\tau B^0 = 1.083 \pm 0.017$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho/\omega\gamma)/\Gamma(\bar{K}^*(892)\gamma) \qquad \Gamma_{89}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.84<sup>+0.50</sup><sub>-0.29</sub>±0.27</td><td></td><td>1 TANIGUCHI 08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$<3.5$ $^3$MOHAPATRA 05 BELL Repl. by TANIGUCHI 08

$^1$Also reports $|V_{td}/V_{ts}| = 0.195^{+0.020}_{-0.019} \pm 0.015$.