$\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 e^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{577}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.8 x 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23G LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1.6 x 10⁻⁷ 90 2 SANDILYA 18 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<5.3 x 10⁻⁷ 90 3 AUBERT,B 06J BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1 Uses the uniform phase space model for the signal decays.

2 Uses $B(T(4S) \rightarrow B^0\bar{B}^0) = 0.486 \pm 0.006$.

3 Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ at $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 e^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{578}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.7 x 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23G LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1.2 x 10⁻⁷ 90 2 SANDILYA 18 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<3.4 x 10⁻⁷ 90 3 AUBERT,B 06J BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1 Uses the uniform phase space model for the signal decays.

2 Uses $B(T(4S) \rightarrow B^0\bar{B}^0) = 0.486 \pm 0.006$.

3 Assumes equal production of $B^0$ and $B^+$ at $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 e^\pm\mu^\mp)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{579}/\Gamma$

Test of lepton family number conservation.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 1.01 x 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23G LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1.8 x 10⁻⁷ 90 2 SANDILYA 18 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<5.8 x 10⁻⁷ 90 3 AUBERT,B 06J BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<34 x 10⁻⁷ 90 3 AUBERT,B 06J BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1 Uses the uniform phase space model for the signal decays.

2 Uses $B(T(4S) \rightarrow B^0\bar{B}^0) = 0.486 \pm 0.006$.

3 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \tau^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{580}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.0 x 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Using $B^0 \rightarrow D^-D_S^+$ as normalisation decay.

$\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \tau^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{581}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8.2 x 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Using $B^0 \rightarrow D^-D_S^+$ as normalisation decay.

$\Gamma(e^\pm\tau^\mp)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{582}/\Gamma$

Test of lepton family number conservation. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6 x 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ATMACAN</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<2.8 x 10⁻⁵ 90 2 AUBERT 08AD BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<1.1 x 10⁻⁴ 90 2 AUBERT 08AD BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<5.3 x 10⁻⁴ 90 2 AUBERT 08AD BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1 Uses events in which one B meson is fully reconstructed in a hadronic decay mode.

2 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$\Gamma(\mu^\pm\tau^\mp)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{583}/\Gamma$

Test of lepton family number conservation. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.4 x 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AK LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1.5 x 10⁻⁵ 90 2 ATMACAN 21 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<2.2 x 10⁻⁵ 90 3 AUBERT 08AD BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<3.8 x 10⁻⁵ 90 3 AUBERT 08AD BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

<8.3 x 10⁻⁴ 90 3 AMMAR 04 CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)

1 Assuming no contribution from $B^0 \rightarrow \mu^\pm\tau^\mp$.

2 Uses events in which one B meson is fully reconstructed in a hadronic decay mode.

3 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(4S)$.

$\Gamma(p\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{584}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.6 x 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23Y pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes that $B^0$ decay branching fractions to $p\mu^-$ and $\bar{p}\mu^+$ are the same.

$\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{585}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.4 x 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SARA,11K BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11K reports < 180 x 10⁻⁸ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \rightarrow \Lambda_c^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \rightarrow pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \rightarrow pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \rightarrow pK^-\pi^+) = 6.24 \times 10^{-2}$.

2 Uses $B(T(4S) \rightarrow B^0\bar{B}^0) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(T(4S) \rightarrow B^+\bar{B}^-) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

$\Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{586}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4 x 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SARA,11K BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11K reports < 520 x 10⁻⁸ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \rightarrow \Lambda_c^+ e^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \rightarrow pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \rightarrow pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \rightarrow pK^-\pi^+) = 6.24 \times 10^{-2}$.

2 Uses $B(T(4S) \rightarrow B^0\bar{B}^0) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(T(4S) \rightarrow B^+\bar{B}^-) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

$B^0$ CROSS-PARTICLE BRANCHING RATIOS

$\Gamma([K^+K^-]_D K^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times B(B^0_s \rightarrow [K^+K^-]_D K^*(892)^0)$

$\Gamma_{155}/\Gamma \times B$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVENTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.10 ± 0.02 ± 0.01</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14BN LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma([\pi^+\pi^-]_D K^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times B(B^0_s \rightarrow [\pi^+\pi^-]_D K^*(892)^0)$

$\Gamma_{156}/\Gamma \times B$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVENTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.15 ± 0.04 ± 0.01</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14BN LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

See the related review(s):

Polarization in B Decays

POLARIZATION IN $B^0$ DECAY

In decays involving two vector mesons, one can distinguish among the states in which meson polarizations are both longitudinal (L) or both are transverse and parallel (||) or perpendicular (⊥) to each other with the parameters $\Gamma_L/\Gamma$, $\Gamma_⊥/\Gamma$, and the relative phases $\phi_\parallel$ and $\phi_⊥$. See the definitions in the note on "Polarization in B Decays" review in the $B^0$ Particle Listings.

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi(1S) K^*(892)^0$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVENTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.571 ± 0.007</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.572 ± 0.006 ± 0.014</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AT LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.587 ± 0.011 ± 0.013</td><td></td><td>2 ABAZOV</td><td>09E D0</td><td>pT at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.556 ± 0.009 ± 0.010</td><td></td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>07AD BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.562 ± 0.026 ± 0.018</td><td></td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>pT at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.574 ± 0.012 ± 0.009</td><td></td><td>ITOH</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.59 ± 0.06 ± 0.01</td><td></td><td>4 AFFOLDER</td><td>00N CDF</td><td>pT at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.52 ± 0.07 ± 0.04</td><td></td><td>5 JESSOP</td><td>97 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.65 ± 0.10 ± 0.04</td><td></td><td>ABE</td><td>95Z CDF</td><td>pT at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.97 ± 0.16 ± 0.15</td><td></td><td>6 ALBRECHT</td><td>94G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.566 ± 0.012 ± 0.005 3 AUBERT 05P BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07AD

0.62 ± 0.02 ± 0.03 7 ABE 02N BELL Repl. by ITOH 05

0.597 ± 0.028 ± 0.024 8 AUBERT 01H BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07AD

0.80 ± 0.08 ± 0.05 42 ALAM 94 CLE2 Sup. by JESSOP 97

1 AAIJ 13AT obtains $\Gamma_\parallel/\Gamma = 0.227 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.011$. The relation 1 = ($\Gamma_L + \Gamma_\perp + \Gamma_\parallel$)/$\Gamma$ is used to obtain $\Gamma_L/\Gamma$.

2 Measured the angular and lifetime parameters for the time-dependent angular untagged decays $B^0_d \rightarrow J/\psi K^*0$ and $B^0_s \rightarrow J/\psi \phi$.

3 Obtained by combining the $B^0$ and $B^+$ modes.

4 AFFOLDER 00N measurements are based on 190 $B^0$ candidates obtained from a data sample of 89 pb⁻¹. The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.13 ± 0.09 ± 0.06.

5 JESSOP 97 is the average over a mixture of $B^0$ and $B^+$ decays. The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.16 ± 0.08 ± 0.04.

6 Averaged over an admixture of $B^0$ and $B^+$ decays.

7 Averaged over an admixture of $B^0$ and $B^+$ decays and the P-wave fraction is (19 ± 2 ± 3)%.

8 Averaged over an admixture of $B^0$ and $B^-$ decays and the P-wave fraction is (16.0 ± 3.2 ± 1.4) x 10⁻².

$\Gamma_\perp/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K^*0$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVENTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.211 ± 0.008</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.201 ± 0.004 ± 0.008</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AT LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.230 ± 0.013 ± 0.025</td><td></td><td>1 ABAZOV</td><td>09E D0</td><td>pT at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.233 ± 0.010 ± 0.005</td><td></td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07AD BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.215 ± 0.032 ± 0.006</td><td></td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>pT at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.195 ± 0.012 ± 0.008</td><td></td><td>ITOH</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured the angular and lifetime parameters for the time-dependent angular untagged decays $B^0_d \rightarrow J/\psi K^*0$ and $B^0_s \rightarrow J/\psi \phi$.

2 Obtained by combining the $B^0$ and $B^+$ modes.
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.211±0.008 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_606.png" /></figure>

$\phi_{\parallel}$ in $B^0 \to J/\psi K^{*0}$

VALUE (rad)

-2.92±0.04 OUR AVERAGE

$-2.94 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.03$

$-2.69 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.11$

$-2.93 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.04$

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

AAIJ

1 ABAZOV

2 AUBERT

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

13AT LHCB

09E D0

07AD BABR

COMMENT

See the ideogram below.

pp at 7 TeV

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

¹Obtained $\phi_{\parallel}$ as $\delta_2 - \delta_1$, assuming they are uncorrelated.

²Obtained by combining the $B^0$ and $B^+$ modes.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
-2.92±0.04 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_607.png" /></figure>

$\phi_{\perp}$ in $B^0 \to J/\psi K^{*0}$

VALUE (rad)

2.96±0.05 OUR AVERAGE

$2.94 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.02$

$3.21 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.06$

$2.91 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.03$

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

AAIJ

ABAZOV

1 AUBERT

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

13AT LHCB

09E D0

07AD BABR

COMMENT

See the ideogram below.

pp at 7 TeV

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

¹Obtained by combining the $B^0$ and $B^+$ modes.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
2.96±0.05 (Error scaled by 2.2)

<figure><img src="image_608.png" /></figure>

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \to \psi(2S) K^*(892)^0$

VALUE

0.463 $^{+0.028}_{-0.040}$ OUR AVERAGE

$0.455 \pm 0.031 \pm 0.014$

$0.48 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.02$

$0.45 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.04$

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

CHILIKIN 13 BELL $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

1 AUBERT

2 RICHICHI

07AD BABR $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

01 CLE2 $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$0.448 \pm 0.040 \pm 0.040$

¹Obtained by combining the $B^0$ and $B^+$ modes.

²Averages between charged and neutral B mesons.

$\Gamma_{\perp}/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \to \psi(2S) K^*0$

VALUE

0.30±0.06±0.02

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

1 AUBERT 07AD BABR $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

$\phi_{\parallel}$ in $B^0 \to \psi(2S) K^{*0}$

VALUE (rad)

-2.8±0.4±0.1

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

1 AUBERT 07AD BABR $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

$\phi_{\perp}$ in $B^0 \to \psi(2S) K^{*0}$

VALUE (rad)

2.8±0.3±0.1

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

1 AUBERT 07AD BABR $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \to \chi_{c1} K^*(892)^0$

VALUE

0.83 $^{+0.06}_{-0.08}$ OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

MIZUK 08 BELL $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

1 AUBERT

07AD BABR

07AD BABR $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

¹Obtained by combining the $B^0$ and $B^+$ modes.

$\Gamma_{\perp}/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \to \chi_{c1} K^*(892)^0$

VALUE

0.03±0.04±0.02

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

1 AUBERT 07AD BABR $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

$\phi_{\parallel}$ in $B^0 \to \chi_{c1} K^*(892)^0$

VALUE (rad)

0.0±0.3±0.1

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

1 AUBERT 07AD BABR $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \to D^{*-} \ell^+ \nu_{\ell}$

VALUE

0.487±0.017±0.005

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

PRIM 23 BELL $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \to D^{*-} e^+ \nu_e$

VALUE

0.516±0.013 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

ADACHI 23J BELL $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

PRIM 23 BELL $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

0.471±0.024±0.007

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \to D^{*-} \mu^+ \nu_{\mu}$

VALUE

0.525±0.007 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

ADACHI 23J BELL $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

$\Delta(\Gamma_L/\Gamma)$ in $B^0 \to D^{*-} \ell^+ \nu_{\ell}$

$\Delta(\Gamma_L/\Gamma) = (\Gamma_L/\Gamma)^\mu - (\Gamma_L/\Gamma)^e$

VALUE

0.008±0.008 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

ADACHI 23J BELL $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

PRIM 23 BELL $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \to D_s^+ D^{*-}$

VALUE

0.574±0.014 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

1 AAIJ

2 AUBERT

21S LHCB $pp$ at 13 TeV

03I BABR $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

00B CLE2 $e^+ e^- \to \tau(4S)$

0.578±0.010±0.011

0.519±0.050±0.028

0.506±0.139±0.036

¹AAIJ 21s uses $D_s^+ \to D_s^+ \gamma$ decays.

²Measurement performed using partial reconstruction of $D^{*-}$ decay.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

### |H⁺| in B⁰ → D_s⁺D⁻⁺

H⁺, H_ define parity-even (‖) and parity-odd (⊥) polarization transversity amplitudes
A_‖,⊥ = (H_+ ± H_-)/√2.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.195±0.022±0.032</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21s</td><td>BELL pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 21s uses D_s⁺ → D_s⁻γ decays.

### |H⁻| in B⁰ → D_s⁺D⁻⁺

H⁺, H_ define parity-even (‖) and parity-odd (⊥) polarization transversity amplitudes
A_‖,⊥ = (H_+ ± H_-)/√2.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.620±0.011±0.013</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21s</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 21s uses D_s⁺ → D_s⁻γ decays.

### φ_+ in B⁰ → D_s⁺D⁻⁺

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.046±0.102±0.020</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21s</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 21s uses D_s⁺ → D_s⁻γ decays.

### φ_⁻ in B⁰ → D_s⁺D⁻⁺

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.108±0.170±0.051</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21s</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 21s uses D_s⁺ → D_s⁻γ decays.

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → D⁻⁻ρ⁺

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVENTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.885±0.016±0.012</td><td></td><td>CSORNA</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.93 ± 0.05 ± 0.05</td><td>76</td><td>ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2 e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → D_s⁺ρ⁻

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.84<sup>+0.26</sup><sub>-0.28</sub>±0.13</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AJ</td><td>BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → D_s⁺K⁻⁺

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.92<sup>+0.37</sup><sub>-0.31</sub>±0.07</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AJ</td><td>BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → D_s⁺D⁻⁺

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.624±0.029±0.011</td><td>KRONENBIT...12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.57 ± 0.08 ± 0.02</td><td>MIYAKE</td><td>05</td><td>BELL Repl. by KRONENBITTER 12</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ_⊥/Γ in B⁰ → D_s⁺D⁻⁺

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.147±0.019 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.138±0.024±0.006</td><td>KRONENBIT...12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.158±0.028±0.006</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C</td><td>BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.125±0.043±0.023</td><td>VERVINK</td><td>09</td><td>BELL Repl. by KRONENBITTER 12</td></tr><tr><td>0.143±0.034±0.008</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07B0</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09C</td></tr><tr><td>0.125±0.044±0.007</td><td>AUBERT,BE</td><td>05A</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07B0</td></tr><tr><td>0.19 ± 0.08 ± 0.01</td><td>MIYAKE</td><td>05</td><td>BELL Repl. by VERVINK 09</td></tr><tr><td>0.063±0.055±0.009</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03Q</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,BE 05A</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → D_s⁺ω

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.665±0.047±0.015</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → D_1(2430)⁰ω

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>63.0±9.1<sup>+6.5</sup><sub>-6.0</sub></td><td>1,2 MATVIENKO</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtained by amplitude analysis of B⁰ → D⁻⁻ωπ⁺. The second uncertainty combines in qudruad Experimental systematic and model uncertainties.

²Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at T(4S).

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → D_1(2420)⁰ω

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>67.1±11.7<sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-5.0</sub></td><td>1,2 MATVIENKO</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtained by amplitude analysis of B⁰ → D⁻⁻ωπ⁺. The second uncertainty combines in qudruad Experimental systematic and model uncertainties.

²Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at T(4S).

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → D_2(2460)⁰ω

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>76.0<sup>+18.3</sup><sub>-8.5</sub>±3.5</td><td>1,2 MATVIENKO</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtained by amplitude analysis of B⁰ → D⁻⁻ωπ⁺. The second uncertainty combines in qudruad Experimental systematic and model uncertainties.

²Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at T(4S).

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → D_s⁻ωπ⁺

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.654±0.042±0.016</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>06L</td><td>BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Invariant mass of the [ωπ] system is restricted in the region 1.1 and 1.9 GeV.

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → ωK*⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.69±0.11 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.68±0.17±0.16</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.72±0.14±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.56±0.29<sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.08</sub></td><td>GOLDENZWE...08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ_⊥/Γ in B⁰ → ωK* (892)⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.10±0.09±0.09</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A_0<sup>CP</sup> in B⁰ → ωK* (892)⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.13±0.27±0.13</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sup>⊥</sup><sub>CP</sub> in B⁰ → ωK* (892)⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.3±0.8±0.4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sup>||</sup><sub>CP</sub> in B⁰ → ωK* (892)⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.26±0.55±0.22</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### φ₀ in B⁰ → ωK* (892)⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.86±0.29±0.71</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### φ_⊥ in B⁰ → ωK* (892)⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.6±0.4±0.6</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### φ<sub>||</sub> in B⁰ → ωK* (892)⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-1.83±0.29±0.32</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → ωK<sup>*0</sup> (1430)⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.45±0.12±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → K*⁰K*⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.74±0.05 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.724±0.051±0.016</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08I</td><td>BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.80<sup>+0.10</sup><sub>-0.12</sub>±0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08I</td><td>BABR e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Untagged and time-integrated analysis within 150 MeV of the K*⁰ mass.

### Γ_L/Γ in B⁰ → φK* (892)⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.497±0.017 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.497±0.019±0.015</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AMLHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.499±0.030±0.018</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.494±0.034±0.013</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.506±0.040±0.015</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr><tr><td>0.45 ± 0.05 ± 0.02</td><td>CHEN</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL Repl. by PRIM 13</td></tr><tr><td>0.52 ± 0.05 ± 0.02</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04W</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07D</td></tr><tr><td>0.65 ± 0.07 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03V</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 04W</td></tr><tr><td>0.41 ± 0.10 ± 0.04</td><td>CHEN</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHEN 05A</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT,B 04W also measures the fraction of parity-odd transverse contribution f_⊥ = 0.22 ± 0.05 ± 0.02 and the phases of the parity-even and parity-odd transverse amplitudes relative to the longitudinal amplitude.

### Γ_⊥/Γ in B⁰ → φK* (892)⁰

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.224±0.015 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.221±0.016±0.013</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AMLHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.238±0.026±0.008</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.212±0.032±0.013</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

²This quantity was recalculated by the BELLE authors from numbers in the original paper.
### $\phi_{\parallel}$ in $B^0 \to \phi K^*(892)^0$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (rad)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.43 ±0.11</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">Error includes scale factor of 1.8. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>2.562 ±0.069 ±0.040</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AM LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.23 ±0.10 ±0.02</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.40 ±0.13 ±0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.31 ±0.14 ±0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.40 ±0.28<br/>-0.24 ±0.07</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by PRIM 13</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.34 ±0.23<br/>-0.20 ±0.05</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>04W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07D</td></tr></table>

¹ This quantity was recalculated by the BELLE authors from numbers in the original paper.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
2.43±0.11 (Error scaled by 1.8)

<figure><img src="image_609.png" /></figure>

### $\phi_{\perp}$ in $B^0 \to \phi K^*(892)^0$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (rad)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.53 ±0.09</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">Error includes scale factor of 1.7. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>2.633 ±0.062 ±0.037</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AM LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.37 ±0.10 ±0.04</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.35 ±0.13 ±0.09</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.24 ±0.15 ±0.09</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.51 ±0.25 ±0.06</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by PRIM 13</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.47 ±0.25 ±0.05</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>04W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07D</td></tr></table>

¹ This quantity was recalculated by the BELLE authors from numbers in the original paper.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
2.53±0.09 (Error scaled by 1.7)

<figure><img src="image_610.png" /></figure>

### $\delta_0(B^0 \to \phi K^*(892)^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (rad)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.88 ±0.10</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>2.91 ±0.10 ±0.08</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.82 ±0.15 ±0.09</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.78 ±0.17 ±0.09</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></table>

### $A_{CP}^0$ in $B^0 \to \phi K^*(892)^0$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.007 ±0.030</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.003 ±0.038 ±0.005</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AM LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.030 ±0.061 ±0.007</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.01 ±0.07 ±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.03 ±0.08 ±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.13 ±0.12 ±0.04</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by PRIM 13</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.06 ±0.10 ±0.01</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>04W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07D</td></tr></table>

¹ This quantity was recalculated by the BELLE authors from numbers in the original paper.

### $A_{CP}^{\perp}$ in $B^0 \to \phi K^*(892)^0$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.02 ±0.06</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.047 ±0.074 ±0.009</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AM LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.14 ±0.11 ±0.01</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.04 ±0.15 ±0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.03 ±0.16 ±0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.20 ±0.18 ±0.04</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by PRIM 13</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.10 ±0.24 ±0.05</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>04W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07D</td></tr></table>

¹ This quantity was recalculated by the BELLE authors from numbers in the original paper.

### $\Delta\phi_{\parallel}$ in $B^0 \to \phi K^*(892)^0$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (rad)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.05 ±0.05</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.045 ±0.069 ±0.015</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AM LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.02 ±0.10 ±0.01</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.22 ±0.12 ±0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.24 ±0.14 ±0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.32 ±0.27 ±0.07</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by PRIM 13</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.27 ±0.20<br/>-0.23 ±0.05</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>04W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07D</td></tr></table>

¹ This quantity was recalculated by the BELLE authors from numbers in the original paper.

### $\Delta\phi_{\perp}$ in $B^0 \to \phi K^*(892)^0$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (rad)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.08 ±0.05</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.062 ±0.062 ±0.015</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AM LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.02 ±0.10 ±0.01</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.22 ±0.12 ±0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.19 ±0.15 ±0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>-0.30 ±0.25 ±0.06</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by PRIM 13</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.36 ±0.25 ±0.05</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>04W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07D</td></tr></table>

¹ This quantity was recalculated by the BELLE authors from numbers in the original paper.

### $\Delta\phi_0(B^0 \to \phi K^*(892)^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (rad)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.13 ±0.09</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.08 ±0.10 ±0.01</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.27 ±0.14 ±0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.21 ±0.17 ±0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></table>

### $\Delta\phi_0(B^0 \to \phi K_0^*(1430)^0)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (rad)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.28 ±0.42 ±0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### $\Gamma_L/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^0$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.913 ±0.028<br/>-0.050</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.918 ±0.029<br/>-0.060 ±0.012</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.901 ±0.046 ±0.037</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.853 ±0.061<br/>-0.069 ±0.036</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></table>

### $\Gamma_{\perp}/\Gamma$ in $B^0 \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^0$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.027 ±0.031<br/>-0.025</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.056 ±0.050<br/>-0.035 ±0.009</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.002 ±0.018<br/>-0.002 ±0.031</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.045 ±0.049<br/>-0.040 ±0.013</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

$$\phi_{\parallel} \text{ in } B^0 \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE (rad)} \\ \mathbf{4.0} \pm 0.4 \textbf{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array}$$

$$3.76 \pm 2.88 \pm 1.32$$

$$3.96 \pm 0.38 \pm 0.06$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

$$2.90 \pm 0.39 \pm 0.06$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

PRIM 13 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

AUBERT 08BG BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • •

AUBERT 07D BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08BG

$$\phi_{\perp} \text{ in } B^0 \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE (rad)} \\ \mathbf{4.45} \pm \frac{0.43}{-0.38} \pm 0.13 \end{array}$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{4.45} \pm \frac{0.43}{-0.38} \pm 0.13 \end{array}$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

$$5.72 \pm \frac{0.55}{-0.87} \pm 0.11$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

PRIM 13 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

AUBERT 07D BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08BG

$$\delta_0(B^0 \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^0)$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE (rad)} \\ \mathbf{3.46} \pm 0.14 \textbf{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array}$$

$$3.53 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.19$$

$$3.41 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.13$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

$$3.54 \pm \frac{0.12}{-0.14} \pm 0.06$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

PRIM 13 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

AUBERT 08BG BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • •

AUBERT 07D BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08BG

$$A_{CP}^0 \text{ in } B^0 \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{-0.03} \pm 0.04 \textbf{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array}$$

$$-0.016 \pm \frac{0.066}{-0.051} \pm 0.008$$

$$-0.05 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.01$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

PRIM 13 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

AUBERT 08BG BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$$A_{CP}^{\perp} \text{ in } B^0 \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{-0.01} \pm \frac{0.85}{-0.67} \pm 0.09 \end{array}$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{-0.01} \pm \frac{0.85}{-0.67} \pm 0.09 \end{array}$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

PRIM 13 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$$\Delta\phi_{\parallel}(B^0 \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^0)$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE (rad)} \\ \mathbf{-0.9} \pm 0.4 \textbf{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array}$$

$$-0.02 \pm 1.08 \pm 0.11$$

$$-1.00 \pm 0.38 \pm 0.09$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

PRIM 13 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

AUBERT 08BG BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$$\Delta\phi_1(B^0 \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^0)$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{-0.19} \pm 0.42 \pm 0.11 \end{array}$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{-0.19} \pm 0.42 \pm 0.11 \end{array}$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

PRIM 13 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$$\Delta\delta_0 \text{ in } B^0 \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE (rad)} \\ \mathbf{0.08} \pm 0.09 \textbf{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array}$$

$$0.06 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.02$$

$$0.11 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.06$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

PRIM 13 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

AUBERT 08BG BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \rho^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{0.173} \pm 0.026 \textbf{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array}$$

$$0.164 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.022$$

$$0.40 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.11$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

$$0.57 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.08$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 19J LHCB $pp \text{ at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV}$

LEES 12K BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

AUBERT,B 06G BABR Repl. by LEES 12K

$$\Gamma_{\perp}/\Gamma \text{ in } B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \rho^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{0.401} \pm 0.016 \pm 0.037 \end{array}$$

$$A_{CP}^0 \text{ in } B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \rho^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{-0.62} \pm 0.09 \pm 0.09 \end{array}$$

$$A_{CP}^{\perp} \text{ in } B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \rho^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{0.050} \pm 0.039 \pm 0.015 \end{array}$$

$$A_{CP}^{\parallel} \text{ in } B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \rho^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{0.188} \pm 0.037 \pm 0.022 \end{array}$$

$$\phi_0 \text{ in } B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \rho^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{1.57} \pm 0.08 \pm 0.18 \end{array}$$

$$\phi_{\perp} \text{ in } B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \rho^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{-2.365} \pm 0.032 \pm 0.054 \end{array}$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 19J LHCB $pp \text{ at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV}$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 19J LHCB $pp \text{ at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV}$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 19J LHCB $pp \text{ at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV}$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 19J LHCB $pp \text{ at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV}$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 19J LHCB $pp \text{ at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV}$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 19J LHCB $pp \text{ at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV}$

$$\phi_{\parallel} \text{ in } B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \rho^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{0.795} \pm 0.030 \pm 0.068 \end{array}$$

$$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^0 \to K^*+\rho^-$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{0.38} \pm 0.13 \pm 0.03 \end{array}$$

$$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^0 \to \rho^+\rho^-$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{0.990} \pm \frac{0.021}{-0.019} \textbf{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array}$$

$$0.988 \pm 0.012 \pm 0.023$$

$$0.992 \pm 0.024 \pm \frac{0.026}{-0.013}$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 19J LHCB $pp \text{ at } 7, 8 \text{ TeV}$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

LEES 12K BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

VANHOEFER 16 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

AUBERT 07BF BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

0.941 $\pm \frac{0.034}{-0.040} \pm 0.030$

0.978 $\pm 0.014 \pm \frac{0.021}{-0.029}$

0.98 $\pm \frac{0.02}{-0.08} \pm 0.03$

0.99 $\pm 0.03 \pm \frac{0.04}{-0.03}$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

0.71 $\pm \frac{0.08}{-0.09}$ OUR AVERAGE

Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below.

0.745 $\pm \frac{0.048}{-0.058} \pm 0.034$

0.75 $\pm \frac{0.11}{-0.14} \pm 0.05$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc.

0.87 $\pm 0.13 \pm 0.04$

<figure><img src="image_611.png" /></figure>

$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^0 \to \rho^0 \rho^0$

$$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^0 \to a_1(1260)^+ a_1(1260)^-$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{0.31} \pm 0.22 \pm 0.10 \end{array}$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AUBERT 09AL BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

CHEN 08C BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

CHANG 09 BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AABOUD 18BY ATLS $pp \text{ at } 8 \text{ TeV}$

$$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^0 \to \Lambda\bar{\Lambda}K^*(892)^0$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{0.60} \pm 0.22 \pm 0.08 \end{array}$$

$$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \mu^+\mu^- \text{ (0.04} < q^2 < 6.0 \text{ GeV}^2/\text{c}^4)$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{0.50} \pm 0.06 \pm 0.04 \end{array}$$

¹ A set of angular parameters obtained for this decay is also presented.

$$\Gamma_L/\Gamma \text{ in } B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 e^+e^- \text{ (at low } q^2)$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \textbf{VALUE} \\ \mathbf{0.044} \pm 0.026 \pm 0.014 \end{array}$$

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 20AO LHCB $pp \text{ at } 7, 8, 13 \text{ TeV}$

0.16 $\pm 0.06 \pm 0.03$

2 AAIJ 15Z LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20AO

¹ Determined in the effective dielectron invariant mass range 0.0008 < $q^2$ < 0.257GeV$^2$/c$^4$.

² Determined in the effective dielectron invariant mass range 0.002 < $q^2$ < 1.120 GeV$^2$/c$^4$.
$A_T^{(2)}$ in B⁰ → K*(892)⁰e⁺e⁻ (at low q²)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.11±0.10±0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20AO LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.23±0.23±0.05</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>15Z LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20AO</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Determined in the effective dielectron invariant mass range 0.0008<q² <0.257GeV²/c⁴.

²Determined in the effective dielectron invariant mass range 0.002 <q² < 1.120 GeV²/c⁴.

$A_T^{lm}$ in B⁰ → K*(892)⁰e⁺e⁻ (at low q²)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.02±0.10±0.01</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20AO LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.14±0.22±0.05</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>15Z LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 20AO</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Determined in the effective dielectron invariant mass range 0.0008<q² <0.257GeV²/c⁴.

²Determined in the effective dielectron invariant mass range 0.002 <q² < 1.120 GeV²/c⁴.

$A_T^{Re}$ in B⁰ → K*(892)⁰e⁺e⁻ (at low q²)

Related to A<sub>F B</sub>, F<sub>L</sub> by $A_T^{Re} = (4/3) A_{F B} / (1 - F_L)$.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.06±0.08±0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20AO LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.10±0.18±0.05 2 AAIJ 15Z LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 20AO

¹Determined in the effective dielectron invariant mass range 0.0008<q² <0.257GeV²/c⁴.

²Determined in the effective dielectron invariant mass range 0.002 <q² < 1.120 GeV²/c⁴.

See the related review(s):

B⁰ → B⁰ Mixing

B⁰-B⁰ MIXING PARAMETERS

For a discussion of B⁰-B⁰ mixing see the note on "B⁰-B⁰ Mixing" in the B⁰ Particle Listings above.

$χ_d$ is a measure of the time-integrated B⁰-B⁰ mixing probability that a produced B⁰(B⁰) decays as a B⁰(B⁰). Mixing violates ΔB ≠ 2 rule.

$$χ_d = \frac{\chi_d^2}{2(1+χ_d^2)}$$

$$χ_d = \frac{Δm_{B^0}}{\Gamma_{B^0}} = (m_{B_H^0} - m_{B_L^0}) \tau_{B^0},$$

where H, L stand for heavy and light states of two B⁰ CP eigenstates and $τ_{B^0} = \frac{1}{0.5(\Gamma_{B_H^0} + \Gamma_{B_L^0})}$.

Xd

This B⁰-B⁰ mixing parameter is the probability (integrated over time) that a produced B⁰ (or B⁰) decays as a B⁰ (or B⁰), e.g. for inclusive lepton decays

$$χ_d = \frac{\Gamma(B^0 → \ell^- X) / \Gamma(B^0 → \ell^+ X)}{\Gamma(B^0 → \ell^+ X) / \Gamma(B^0 → \ell^- X)}$$

Where experiments have measured the parameter $r = χ/(1-χ)$, we have converted to $χ$. Mixing violates the ΔB ≠ 2 rule.

Note that the measurement of $χ$ at energies higher than the $Υ(4S)$ have not separated $χ_d$ from $χ_s$ where the subscripts indicate $B^0/(b\bar{d})$ or $B^0_s/(b\bar{s})$. They are listed in the $B^+/B^0/B^0_s/b$-baryon ADMIXTURE section.

The experiments at $Υ(4S)$ make an assumption about the B⁰-B⁰ fraction and about the ratio of the B⁰ and B⁰ semileptonic branching ratios (usually that it equals one).

"OUR EVALUATION" is an average using rescaled values of the data listed below. The averaging/rescaling procedure takes into account correlations between the measurements, includes $χ_d$ calculated from $Δm_{B^0}$ and $τ_{B^0}$.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.1860±0.0011</strong> OUR EVALUATION<br><strong>0.182 ±0.015</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.198 ±0.013 ±0.014</td><td>1</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>00B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.16 ±0.04 ±0.04</td><td>2</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>94 ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.149 ±0.023 ±0.022</td><td>3</td><td>BARTELT</td><td>93 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.171 ±0.048</td><td>4</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>92L ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.20 ±0.13 ±0.12</td><td>5</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>96D ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.19 ±0.07 ±0.09</td><td>6</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>96D ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.24 ±0.12</td><td>7</td><td>ELSEN</td><td>90 JADE</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> 35-44 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.158 ±0.052<br>-0.059</td><td>8</td><td>ARTUSO</td><td>89 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.17 ±0.05</td><td>8</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>87I ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.19</td><td>90</td><td>9 BEAN</td><td>87B CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.27</td><td>90</td><td>10 AVERY</td><td>84 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BEHRENS 00B uses high-momentum lepton tags and partially reconstructed B⁰ → D*+π⁻, ρ⁻ decays to determine the flavor of the B meson.

²ALBRECHT 94 reports $r=0.194±0.062±0.054$. We convert to $χ$ for comparison. Uses tagged events (lepton + pion from D*).

³BARTELT 93 analysis performed using tagged events (lepton+pion from D*). Using dilepton events they obtain $0.157±0.016^{+0.033}_{-0.028}$.

⁴ALBRECHT 92L is a combined measurement employing several lepton-based techniques. It uses all previous ARGUS data in addition to new data and therefore supersedes ALBRECHT 87I. A value of $r=20.6±7.0\%$ is directly measured. The value can be used to measure $x = ΔM/Γ = 0.72±0.15$ for the $B_d$ meson. Assumes $r_{+-}/f_0 = 1.0±0.05$ and uses $τ_{B^+}/τ_{B^0} = (0.95±0.14) (f_{+-}/f_0)$.

⁵Uses $Δ^+K^±$ correlations.

⁶Uses $(D^+π^-)K^±$ correlations.

⁷These experiments see a combination of $B_S$ and $B_d$ mesons.

⁸ALBRECHT 87I is inclusive measurement with like-sign dileptons, with tagged B decays plus leptons, and one fully reconstructed event. Measures $r=0.21±0.08$. We convert to $χ$ for comparison. Superseded by ALBRECHT 92L.

⁹BEAN 87B measured $r < 0.24$; we converted to $χ$.

¹⁰Same-sign dilepton events. Limit assumes semileptonic BR for B⁺ and B⁰ equal. If B⁰/B⁺ ratio <0.58, no limit exists. The limit was corrected in BEAN 87B from $r < 0.30$ to $r < 0.37$. We converted this limit to $χ$.

$Δm_{B^0} = m_{B_H^0} - m_{B_L^0}$

$Δm_{B^0}$ is a measure of $2π$ times the B⁰-B⁰ oscillation frequency in time-dependent mixing experiments.

"OUR EVALUATION" is an average using rescaled values of the data listed below. The averaging/rescaling procedure takes into account correlations between the measurements and includes $Δm_d$ calculated from $χ_d$ measured at $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>12</sup> h<sub>s</sub><sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.5069±0.0019</td><td colspan="3">OUR EVALUATION (Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr><tr><td>0.516 ±0.008 ±0.005</td><td>1 ABUDINEN</td><td>23D BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.5050±0.0021±0.0010</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>16AV LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.503 ±0.011 ±0.013</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>13CF LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.5156±0.0051±0.0033</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>13F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.499 ±0.032 ±0.003</td><td>5 AAIJ</td><td>12I LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.506 ±0.020 ±0.016</td><td>6 ABAZOV</td><td>06W D0</td><td>p̄p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.511 ±0.007 +0.007<br>-0.006</td><td>7 AUBERT</td><td>06G BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.511 ±0.005 ±0.006</td><td>8 ABE</td><td>05B BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.531 ±0.025 ±0.007</td><td>9 ABDALLAH</td><td>03B DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.492 ±0.018 ±0.013</td><td>10 AUBERT</td><td>03C BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.503 ±0.008 ±0.010</td><td>11 HASTINGS</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.509 ±0.017 ±0.020</td><td>12 ZHENG</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.516 ±0.016 ±0.010</td><td>13 AUBERT</td><td>02I BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.493 ±0.012 ±0.009</td><td>14 AUBERT</td><td>02J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.497 ±0.024 ±0.025</td><td>15 ABBIENDI, G</td><td>00B OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.503 ±0.064 ±0.071</td><td>16 ABE</td><td>99K CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.500 ±0.052 ±0.043</td><td>17 ABE</td><td>99Q CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.516 ±0.099 +0.029<br>-0.035</td><td>18 AFFOLDER</td><td>99C CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.471 +0.078 +0.033<br>-0.068 -0.034</td><td>19 ABE</td><td>98C CDF</td><td>p̄p at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.458 ±0.046 ±0.032</td><td>20 ACCIARRI</td><td>98D L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.437 ±0.043 ±0.044</td><td>21 ACCIARRI</td><td>98D L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.472 ±0.049 ±0.053</td><td>22 ACCIARRI</td><td>98D L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.523 ±0.072 ±0.043</td><td>23 ABREU</td><td>97N DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.493 ±0.042 ±0.027</td><td>21 ABREU</td><td>97N DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.499 ±0.053 ±0.015</td><td>24 ABREU</td><td>97N DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.480 ±0.040 ±0.051</td><td>20 ABREU</td><td>97N DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.444 ±0.029 +0.020<br>-0.017</td><td>21 ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97U OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.430 ±0.043 +0.028<br>-0.030</td><td>20 ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97V OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.482 ±0.044 ±0.024</td><td>25 BUSKULIC</td><td>97D ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.404 ±0.045 ±0.027</td><td>21 BUSKULIC</td><td>97D ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.452 ±0.039 ±0.044</td><td>20 BUSKULIC</td><td>97D ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.539 ±0.060 ±0.024</td><td>26 ALEXANDER</td><td>96V OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.567 ±0.089 +0.029<br>-0.023</td><td>27 ALEXANDER</td><td>96V OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.516 ±0.016 ±0.010</td><td>28 AUBERT</td><td>02N BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.494 ±0.012 ±0.015</td><td>29 HARA</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 05B</td></tr><tr><td>0.528 ±0.017 ±0.011</td><td>30 TOMURA</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 05B</td></tr><tr><td>0.463 ±0.008 ±0.016</td><td>14 ABE</td><td>01D BELL</td><td>Repl. by HASTINGS 03</td></tr><tr><td>0.444 ±0.028 ±0.028</td><td>31 ACCIARRI</td><td>98D L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.497 ±0.035</td><td>32 ABREU</td><td>97N DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.467 ±0.022 +0.017<br>-0.015</td><td>33 ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97V OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.446 ±0.032</td><td>34 BUSKULIC</td><td>97D ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.531 +0.050<br>-0.046</td><td>35 ABREU</td><td>96Q DLPH</td><td>Sup. by ABREU 97N</td></tr><tr><td>0.496 +0.055<br>-0.051</td><td>20 ACCIARRI</td><td>96E L3</td><td>Repl. by ACCIARRI 98D</td></tr><tr><td>0.548 ±0.050 +0.023<br>-0.019</td><td>36 ALEXANDER</td><td>96V OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.496 ±0.046</td><td>37 AKERS</td><td>95J OPAL</td><td>Repl. by ACKERSTAFF 97V</td></tr><tr><td>0.462 +0.040 +0.052<br>-0.035</td><td>20 AKERS</td><td>95J OPAL</td><td>Repl. by ACKERSTAFF 97V</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

0.50 ±0.12 ±0.06

0.508 ±0.075 ±0.025

0.57 ±0.11 ±0.02

0.50 ±0.07 ±0.11

0.50 ±0.06 ±0.10

0.52 ±0.10 ±0.04

0.51 ±0.11 ±0.03

23 ABREU

26 AKERS

27 AKERS

20 BUSKULIC

94B ALEP

93K ALEP

94M DLPH Sup. by ABREU 97N

94C OPAL Repl. by ALEXANDER 96V

94H OPAL Repl. by ALEXANDER 96V

94B ALEP Sup. by BUSKULIC 97D

94B ALEP Sup. by BUSKULIC 97D

93K ALEP Sup. by BUSKULIC 97D

1 Measured using $B^0 \to D^*(\pi^+)\pi^+$ decays.

2 Uses semileptonic decays of $B^0 \to D^-\mu^+\nu_\mu X$ and $B^0 \to D^*(\pi^-)\pi^+\nu_\mu X$, where the D mesons are reconstructed in $D^- \to K^+\pi^-\pi^-$ and $D^*(\pi^-) \to D^0\pi^-$ with $D^0 \to K^+\pi^-\pi^0$.

3 Uses semileptonic decays of $B^0 \to D^-\mu^+\nu_\mu X$ where the $D^-$ mesons are reconstructed in $D^- \to K^+K^-\pi^-\pi^0$.

4 Measured using $B^0 \to D^-\pi^+$ and $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*(892)0$ decays.

5 Measured using $B^0 \to D^-\pi^+$.

6 Uses opposite-side flavor-tagging with $B \to D^*(\mu)\nu_\mu X$ events.

7 Measured using a simultaneous fit of the $B^0$ lifetime and $\bar{B}^0$ $B^0$ oscillation frequency $\Delta m_d$ in the partially reconstructed $B^0 \to D^*\ell\nu$ decays.

8 Measurement performed using a combined fit of CP-violation, mixing and lifetimes.

9 Events with a high transverse momentum lepton were removed and an inclusively reconstructed vertex was required.

10 AUBERT 03c uses a sample of approximately 14,000 exclusively reconstructed $B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\ell\nu$ and simultaneously measures the lifetime and oscillation frequency.

11 HASTINGS 03 measurement based on the time evolution of dilepton events. It also reports $f_\ell/f_0 = 1.01 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.09$ and CPT violation parameters in $B^0\bar{B}^0$ mixing.

12 ZHENG 03 data analyzed using partially reconstructed $\bar{B}^0 \to D^{*-\pi^+} \pi^-$ decay and a flavor tag based on the charge of the lepton with the accompanying B decay.

13 Uses a tagged sample of fully-reconstructed neutral B decays at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

14 Measured based on the time evolution of dilepton events in $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays.

15 Data analyzed using partially reconstructed $\bar{B}^0 \to D^{*+\ell^-} \nu\bar{\nu}$ decay and a combination of flavor tags from the rest of the event.

16 Uses di-muon events.

17 Uses jet-charge and lepton-flavor tagging.

18 Uses $\ell^- D^{*+\ell^-} \ell^+$ events.

19 Uses $\pi^-B$ in the same side.

20 Uses $\ell^-\ell^0$.

21 Uses $\ell^- Q_{\text{hem}}$.

22 Uses $\ell^-\ell$ with impact parameters.

23 Uses $D^{*-\ell^-} Q_{\text{hem}}$.

24 Uses $\pi_s^\pm \ell^- Q_{\text{hem}}$.

25 Uses $D^{*\pm\ell^-} \ell^- Q_{\text{hem}}$.

26 Uses $D^{*\pm\ell^-} Q_{\text{hem}}$.

27 Uses $D^{*-\ell^-}$.

28 AUBERT 02N result based on the same analysis and data sample reported in AUBERT 02l.

29 Uses a tagged sample of $B^0$ decays reconstructed in the mode $B^0 \to D^*\ell\nu$.

30 Uses a tagged sample of fully-reconstructed hadronic $B^0$ decays at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

31 ACCIARRI 98d combines results from $\ell^-\ell$, $\ell^- Q_{\text{hem}}$, and $\ell^-\ell$ with impact parameters.

32 ABREU 97N combines results from $D^{*\pm} Q_{\text{hem}}$, $\ell^- Q_{\text{hem}}$, $\pi_s^\pm \ell^- Q_{\text{hem}}$, and $\ell^-\ell$.

33 ACKERSTAFF 97v combines results from $\ell^-\ell$, $\ell^- Q_{\text{hem}}$, $D^{*-\ell}$, and $D^{*-\ell^-} Q_{\text{hem}}$.

34 BUSKULIC 97d combines results from $D^{*\pm\ell^-} \ell^- Q_{\text{hem}}$, $\ell^- Q_{\text{hem}}$, and $\ell^-\ell$.

35 ABREU 96q analysis performed using lepton, kaon, and jet-charge tags.

36 ALEXANDER 96V combines results from $D^{*\pm\ell^-} \ell^- D^{*\pm\ell^-} Q_{\text{hem}}$.

37 AKERS 95j combines results from charge measurement, $D^{*\pm\ell^-} Q_{\text{hem}}$ and $\ell^-\ell$.

$$x_d = \frac{\Delta m_{B0}}{\Gamma_{B0}}$$

"OUR EVALUATION" is an average using rescaled values of the data listed below. The averaging/rescaling procedure takes into account correlations between the measurements and includes $\Delta m_d$ calculated from $x_d$ measured at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

VALUE
0.7697 ± 0.0035 OUR EVALUATION

DOCUMENT ID
(Produced by HFLAV)

$$\text{Re}(\lambda_{CP} / |\lambda_{CP}|) \text{ Re(z)}$$

The $\lambda_{CP}$ characterizes $B^0$ and $\bar{B}^0$ decays to states of charmonium plus $K^0$. Parameter $z$ is used to describe CPT violation in mixing, see the review on "CP Violation" in the reviews section.

VALUE
0.047 ± 0.022 ± 0.003

DOCUMENT ID
1 LEES
16E
TECN
BABR

COMMENT
$e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.014 ± 0.035 ± 0.034

2 AUBERT, B 04C BABR Repl. by LEES 16E

1 The first uncertainty is the uncertainty from Re(z) and the second uncertainty is from Re($\lambda/|\lambda|$).

2 Corresponds to 90% confidence range [-0.072, 0.101].

$$\Delta \Gamma \text{ Re(z)}$$

VALUE (ps⁻¹)
-0.0071 ± 0.0039 ± 0.0020

DOCUMENT ID
AUBERT
06T
TECN
BABR

COMMENT
$e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

$$\text{Re(z)}$$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)
-4 ± 4 OUR AVERAGE
-6.5 ± 2.8 ± 1.4
1.9 ± 3.7 ± 3.3

DOCUMENT ID
Error includes scale factor of 1.4.
1 LEES 16E BABR $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$
2 HIGUCHI 12 BELL $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0 ± 12 ± 1

3 HASTINGS 03 BELL Repl. by HIGUCHI 12

1 Measurement uses decays $B^0/\bar{B}^0 \to c\tau K_S^0/K_L^0$.

2 Measured using $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$, $J/\psi K_L^0$, $D^-\pi^+$, $D^*\pi^+$, $D^*\rho^+$, and $D^{*-\ell+\nu}$ decays.

3 Measured using inclusive dilepton events from $B^0$ decay.

$$\text{Im(z)}$$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)
-0.8 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID
1 LEES
16E
TECN
BABR
$e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$
$e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

1.0 ± 3.0 ± 1.3
-0.57 ± 0.33 ± 0.33
-1.39 ± 0.73 ± 0.32

1 LEES
16E BABR $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$
2 HIGUCHI
12 BELL $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$
3 AUBERT
06T BABR $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

3.8 ± 2.9 ± 2.5
-3 ± 1 ± 3

4 AUBERT, B 04C BABR Repl. by AUBERT 06T
5 HASTINGS 03 BELL Repl. by HIGUCHI 12

1 Measurement uses decays $B^0/\bar{B}^0 \to c\tau K_S^0/K_L^0$.

2 Measured using $B^0 \to J/\psi K_S^0$, $J/\psi K_L^0$, $D^-\pi^+$, $D^*\pi^+$, $D^*\rho^+$, and $D^{*-\ell+\nu}$ decays.

3 Measurement uses $B^0/\bar{B}^0 \to \ell^+ X / \ell^- X$ decays. Assuming $\Delta\Gamma = 0$, the result becomes $\text{Im}(z) = (-0.37 \pm 0.54) \times 10^{-2}$.

4 Corresponds to 90% confidence range [-0.028, 0.104].

5 Measured using inclusive dilepton events from $B^0$ decay.

## CP VIOLATION PARAMETERS

$$\text{Re}(\epsilon_{B0}) / (1 + |\epsilon_{B0}|^2)$$

CP impurity in $B^0$ system. It is obtained from either $a_{\ell\ell}$, the charge asymmetry in like-sign dilepton events or $a_{cp}$, the time-dependent asymmetry of inclusive $B^0$ and $\bar{B}^0$ decays.

"OUR EVALUATION" is the result of a fit to $B_d$ and $B_S$ CP asymmetries, which includes the $B_d$ measurements listed below and the $B_S$ measurements listed in the $B_S$ section, taking into account correlations between those measurements.

VALUE (units 10⁻³)
-0.5 ± 0.4 OUR EVALUATION
-0.1 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID
1 AAIJ
15F LHCB $p\bar{p}$ at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.05 ± 0.48 ± 0.75
-0.975 ± 0.875 ± 0.475
1.55 ± 1.05
0.15 ± 0.42 ± 0.94
-1.7 ± 1.1 ± 0.4
0.4 ± 1.3 ± 0.9
-0.4 ± 2.0 ± 2.1
3.5 ± 10.3 ± 1.5

1 AAIJ
15F LHCB $p\bar{p}$ at 7, 8 TeV
2 LEES
15A BABR $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$
3 ABAZOV
14 D0 $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

4 LEES
13N BABR $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

5 ABAZOV
12AC D0 $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV
6 AUBERT
06T BABR $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

7 NAKANO
06 BELL $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$
8 JAFFE
01 CLE2 $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.3 ± 1.3
-2.3 ± 1.1 ± 0.8
-14.7 ± 6.7 ± 5.7
1.2 ± 2.9 ± 3.6

9 ABAZOV
11U D0 Repl. by ABAZOV 14
10 ABAZOV
06S D0 Repl. by ABAZOV 11U
11 AUBERT, B 04C BABR Repl. by AUBERT 06T

2 AUBERT
02k BABR Repl. by LEES 15A
12 BARATE
01D ALEP $e^+ e^- \to Z$

13 BEHRENS
00B CLE2 Repl. by JAFFE 01
14 ABBIENDI
99J OPAL $e^+ e^- \to Z$

15 ACKERSTAFF 97U OPAL $e^+ e^- \to Z$

16 BARTEL T 93 CLE2 $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

< 45

1 AAIJ 15F uses semileptonic $B^0$ decays in the inclusive final states $D^-\mu^+$ and $D^*\mu^+$, where the $D^-\mu^+$ decays into the $K^+\pi^-\pi^-$ final state, and the $D^*\mu^+$ meson into the $\bar{B}^0(\to K^+\pi^-)\pi^-$ final state. Reports $A_{SL}^d = (-0.02 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.30)\%$, which equals to $4\text{Re}(\epsilon_{B0})/(1+|\epsilon_{B0}|^2)$.

2 Uses the charge asymmetry in like-sign dilepton events. LEES 15A reports $A_{SL}^d = (-3.9 \pm 3.5 \pm 1.9) \times 10^{-3}$.

3 ABAZOV 14 uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports $A_{SL}^d = (-0.62 \pm 0.42) \times 10^{-2}$.

4 Uses $B^0 \to D^{*-\ell^-} X \ell^- \nu_\ell$ and a kaon-tagged sample which yields measurement of $A_{SL}^d = (0.06 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.38)\%$, corresponding to $\Delta CP = 1 - |q/p| = (0.29 \pm 0.84 \pm 1.88) \times 10^{-3}$.

5 ABAZOV 12AC uses $B^0 \to D^-\mu^+ X$ and $B^0 \to D^*(2010)^-\mu^+ X$ decays without initial state flavor tagging which yields measurement of $A_{SL}^d = (6.8 \pm 4.5 \pm 1.4) \times 10^{-3}$.

6 AUBERT 06T reports $|q/p|-1 = (-0.8 \pm 2.7 \pm 1.9) \times 10^{-3}$. We convert to $(1-|q/p|^2)/4$.

7 Uses the charge asymmetry in like-sign dilepton events and reports $|q/p| = 1.0005 \pm 0.0040 \pm 0.0043$.

8 JAFFE 01 finds $a_{\ell\ell} = 0.013 \pm 0.050 \pm 0.005$ and combines with the previous BEHRENS 00B independent measurement.

9 ABAZOV 11U uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports $A_{SL}^d = (-1.2 \pm 5.2) \times 10^{-3}$.

10 Uses the dimuon charge asymmetry.

11 AUBERT 04C reports $|q/p| = 1.029 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.011$ and we converted it to $(1-|q/p|^2)/4$.

12 BARATE 01D measured by investigating time-dependent asymmetries in semileptonic and fully inclusive $B^0$ decays.

13 BEHRENS 00B uses high-momentum lepton tags and partially reconstructed $\bar{B}^0 \to D^{*-\pi^+} \rho^-$ decays to determine the flavor of the B meson.
A<sub>T</sub>/CP

A<sub>T</sub>/CP is defined as

$$ \frac{P(\bar{B}^0 \to B^0) - P(B^0 \to \bar{B}^0)}{P(\bar{B}^0 \to B^0) + P(B^0 \to \bar{B}^0)} $$

the CPT invariant asymmetry between the oscillation probabilities P(B<sup>0</sup> → B<sup>0</sup>) and P(B<sup>0</sup> → B<sup>0</sup>).

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.005 ± 0.012 ± 0.014</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>02K</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT 02K uses the charge asymmetry in like-sign dilepton events.

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → D*(2010)+D<sup>-</sup>)

A<sub>CP</sub> is defined as

$$ \frac{B(\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{T}) - B(B^0 \to f)}{B(\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{T}) + B(B^0 \to f)} $$

the CP-violation charge asymmetry of exclusive B⁰ and B⁰ decay.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.013 ± 0.014 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.008 ± 0.014 ± 0.006</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.06 ± 0.05 ± 0.02</td><td>ROHRKEN</td><td>12</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.008 ± 0.048 ± 0.013</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.07 ± 0.08 ± 0.04</td><td>¹AUSHEV</td><td>04</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.12 ± 0.06 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AI</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09C</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03 ± 0.10 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06A</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07AI</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03 ± 0.11 ± 0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03J</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 06B</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Combines results from fully and partially reconstructed B⁰ → D*±D∓ decays.

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.42 ± 2.05 ± 1.22</td><td>BLOOMFIELD</td><td>22</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → [K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.05 ± 0.10 ± 0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.20 ± 0.15 ± 0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14BN</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16S</td></tr><tr><td>-0.45 ± 0.23 ± 0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13L</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 14BN</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → [K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.047 ± 0.027 ± 0.010</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.03 ± 0.04 ± 0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14BN</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 19N</td></tr><tr><td>-0.08 ± 0.08 ± 0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13L</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 14BN</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → [K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.037 ± 0.032 ± 0.010</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → [K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.19 ± 0.19 ± 0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → [K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.01 ± 0.24 ± 0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

R<sup>+</sup><sub>d</sub> = Γ(B<sup>0</sup> → [π<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*0</sup>) / Γ(B<sup>0</sup> → [π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.064 ± 0.021 ± 0.002</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.06 ± 0.03 ± 0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14BN</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 19N</td></tr></tbody></table>

R<sup>-</sup><sub>d</sub> = Γ(B<sup>0</sup> → [π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*0</sup>) / Γ(B<sup>0</sup> → [π<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.095 ± 0.021 ± 0.003</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.06 ± 0.03 ± 0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14BN</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 19N</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → [π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.18 ± 0.14 ± 0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.09 ± 0.22 ± 0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14BN</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 16S</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → [π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.03 ± 0.15 ± 0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

R<sup>+</sup><sub>d</sub> = Γ(B<sup>0</sup> → [π<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*0</sup>) / Γ(B<sup>0</sup> → [π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.074 ± 0.026 ± 0.002</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

R<sup>-</sup><sub>d</sub> = Γ(B<sup>0</sup> → [π<sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*0</sup>) / Γ(B<sup>0</sup> → [π<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>]<sub>D</sub> K<sup>*0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.072 ± 0.025 ± 0.003</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.0831 ± 0.0031 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.072 ± 0.019 ± 0.007</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>24</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.0824 ± 0.0033 ± 0.0033</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21D</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.084 ± 0.004 ± 0.003</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18O</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.083 ± 0.013 ± 0.004</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14P</td><td>CDF p<sup>2</sup> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.069 ± 0.014 ± 0.007</td><td>DUH</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.107 ± 0.016 ± 0.006</td><td>LEES</td><td>13D</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.04 ± 0.16</td><td>¹CHEN</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.080 ± 0.007 ± 0.003</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13AX</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 18O</td></tr><tr><td>-0.088 ± 0.011 ± 0.008</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12V</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13AX</td></tr><tr><td>-0.086 ± 0.023 ± 0.009</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11N</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 14P</td></tr><tr><td>-0.094 ± 0.018 ± 0.008</td><td>LIN</td><td>08</td><td>BELL Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr><tr><td>-0.107 ± 0.018 ± 0.007</td><td>LIN</td><td>07AF</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 13D</td></tr><tr><td>-0.013 ± 0.078 ± 0.012</td><td>ABULENCIA,A</td><td>06D</td><td>CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 11N</td></tr><tr><td>-0.088 ± 0.035 ± 0.013</td><td>²CHAO</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHAO 04B</td></tr><tr><td>-0.133 ± 0.030 ± 0.009</td><td>³AUBERT,B</td><td>04K</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07AF</td></tr><tr><td>-0.101 ± 0.025 ± 0.005</td><td>⁴CHAO</td><td>04B</td><td>BELL Repl. by LIN 08</td></tr><tr><td>-0.07 ± 0.08 ± 0.02</td><td>⁵AUBERT</td><td>02D</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 02Q</td></tr><tr><td>-0.102 ± 0.050 ± 0.016</td><td>⁶AUBERT</td><td>02Q</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 04K</td></tr><tr><td>-0.06 ± 0.09 ± 0.01</td><td>⁷CASEY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHAO 04B</td></tr><tr><td>-0.044 ± 0.186 ± 0.018</td><td>⁸ABE</td><td>01K</td><td>BELL Repl. by CASEY 02</td></tr><tr><td>-0.167 ± 0.021</td><td>⁹AUBERT</td><td>01E</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 02Q</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.30 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.22.

²Corresponds to a 90% CL interval of -0.15 < A<sub>CP</sub> < -0.03.

³Based on a total signal yield of N(K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>) + N(K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>) = 1606 ± 51 events.

⁴CHAO 04b reports significance of 3.9 standard deviation for deviation of A<sub>CP</sub> from zero.

⁵Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.21 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.07.

⁶Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.188 < A<sub>CP</sub> < -0.016.

⁷Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.21 < A<sub>CP</sub> < +0.09.

⁸Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.25 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.37.

⁹Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.35 < A<sub>CP</sub> < -0.03.

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → η' K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.07 ± 0.18 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.22 ± 0.29 ± 0.07</td><td>SATO</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.02 ± 0.23 ± 0.02</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA,¹⁰A</td><td>10A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹AUBERT 07E BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10A

0.08 ± 0.25 ± 0.02

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → η' K<sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.19 ± 0.17 ± 0.02</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA,¹⁰A</td><td>10A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → η' K<sup>2</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.14 ± 0.18 ± 0.02</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA,¹⁰A</td><td>10A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → η' K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.19 ± 0.05 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.17 ± 0.08 ± 0.01</td><td>WANG</td><td>07B</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.21 ± 0.06 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.02 ± 0.11 ± 0.02

A<sub>CP</sub>(B<sup>0</sup> → η' K<sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.06 ± 0.13 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote n="14">¹⁴Data analyzed using the time-dependent asymmetry of inclusive B⁰ decay. The production flavor of B⁰ mesons is determined using both the jet charge and the charge of secondary vertex in the opposite hemisphere.</footnote>

<footnote n="15">¹⁵ACKERSTAFF 97U assumes CPT and is based on measuring the charge asymmetry in a sample of B⁰ decays defined by lepton and Qₘem tags. If CPT is not invoked, Re(ε<sub>B</sub>) = -0.006 ± 0.010 ± 0.006 is found. The indirect CPT violation parameter is determined to Im(δ<sub>B</sub>) = -0.020 ± 0.016 ± 0.006.</footnote>

<footnote n="16">¹⁶BARTELT 93 finds a<sub>ℓℓ</sub> = 0.031 ± 0.096 ± 0.032 which corresponds to |a<sub>ℓℓ</sub>| < 0.18, which yields the above |Re(ε<sub>B0</sub>)/(1+|ε<sub>B0</sub>|²)|.</footnote>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → ηK<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.07±0.19±0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → b<sub>1</sub>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.07±0.12±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → ωK<sup>*0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.45±0.25±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → ω(Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>*0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.07±0.09±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → ωK<sub>2</sub><sup>*0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.37±0.17±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0 ± 6</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-3.0<sup>+</sup><sub>-5.1</sub> ±5.5</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>7 ±11 ±1</td><td>2</td><td>CHANG</td><td>04 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays.

² Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.12 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.26.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → ρ<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.20±0.11</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.20±0.09±0.08</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>11 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.22<sup>+</sup><sub>-0.23</sub> ±0.06</td><td>2</td><td>CHANG</td><td>04 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.11<sup>+</sup><sub>-0.15</sub> ±0.07</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr><tr><td>-0.28±0.17±0.08</td><td>3</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03T BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AQ</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays.

² Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.18 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.64.

³ The result reported corresponds to -A<sub>CP</sub>.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → ρ(1450)<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.10±0.32±0.09</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>11 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → ρ(1700)<sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.36±0.57±0.23</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>11 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> nonresonant)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.10±0.16±0.08</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>11 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.23<sup>+</sup><sub>-0.27</sub> ±0.10</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays. The quoted value is only for the flat part of the non-resonant component.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.01±0.05±0.01</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.27±0.04</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.308±0.060±0.016</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.29±0.11±0.02</td><td>2</td><td>LEES</td><td>11 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.21±0.10±0.02</td><td>3,4</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.21±0.11±0.07</td><td>5</td><td>DALSENO</td><td>09 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.26<sup>+</sup><sub>-0.34</sub> ±0.08</td><td>6</td><td>EISENSTEIN</td><td>03 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.19<sup>+</sup><sub>-0.15</sub> ±0.04</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.11±0.14±0.05</td><td>3</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>06I BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AU</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.23±0.18<sup>+</sup><sub>-0.06</sub></td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>04O</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 06I</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> final state decays.

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays.

³ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays.

⁴ The first of two equivalent solutions is used.

⁵ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays and the first of two consistent solutions that may be preferred.

⁶ Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.31 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.78.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → (Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>*0</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.02 ±0.04</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.032±0.047±0.031</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.07 ±0.14 ±0.01</td><td>2</td><td>LEES</td><td>11 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.09 ±0.07 ±0.03</td><td>3</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.17<sup>+</sup><sub>-0.16</sub> ±0.22</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> final states decays.

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays.

³ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.29±0.22±0.09</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> final state decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>*</sup>(1680)<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.07±0.13±0.04</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> final state decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → f<sub>0</sub>(980)K<sub>5</sub><sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.28±0.27±0.15</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18F LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> final state decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → (Kπ)<sub>0</sub><sup>*0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.15±0.10±0.04</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>11 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.22±0.12<sup>+</sup><sub>-0.29</sub> ±0.30</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>*0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.15±0.12±0.04</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>11 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.09<sup>+</sup><sub>-0.24</sub> ±0.09</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AQ BABR Repl. by LEES 11</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays.

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.07±0.04±0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AS</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.06±0.09±0.02</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>12k BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.09±0.19±0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06G</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 12k</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>*0</sup> f<sub>0</sub>(980))

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.07±0.10±0.02</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>12k BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.17±0.28±0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06G</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 12k</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>+</sup>ρ<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.21±0.15±0.02</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>12k BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.01±0.05±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AS</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → a<sub>1</sub><sup>-</sup>K<sup>+</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.16±0.12±0.01</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08F</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.58<sup>+</sup><sub>-0.66</sub> ±0.04</td><td>1</td><td>LIN</td><td>07 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### A<sub>CP</sub>(B⁰ → K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>φ<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.00 ±0.04</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.007±0.048±0.021</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.01 ±0.06 ±0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.03 ± 0.07 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr><tr><td>0.02 ± 0.09 ± 0.02</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by PRIM 13</td></tr><tr><td>-0.01 ± 0.09 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>04W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07D</td></tr><tr><td>0.04 ± 0.12 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03V BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 04W</td></tr><tr><td>0.07 ± 0.15 ± 0.05</td><td>2 CHEN</td><td>03B BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHEN 05A</td></tr><tr><td>0.00 ± 0.27 ± 0.03</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>02E BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 03V</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.14 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.17.

²Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.18 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.33.

³Corresponds to 90% confidence range -0.44 < A<sub>CP</sub> < 0.44.

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 K^- \pi^+)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.22±0.33±0.20</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AS BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to \phi(K\pi)^*_{0})$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.12 ± 0.08 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.093 ± 0.094 ± 0.017</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.20 ± 0.14 ± 0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.17 ± 0.15 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to \phi K_2^*(1430)^0)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.11 ± 0.10 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.155<sup>+0.152</sup><sub>-0.133</sub> ± 0.033</td><td>PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.08 ± 0.12 ± 0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>



• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.12 ± 0.14 ± 0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to K^*(892)^0 \gamma)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.006 ± 0.011 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.013 ± 0.017 ± 0.004</td><td>1 HORIGUCHI</td><td>17 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.008 ± 0.017 ± 0.009</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.016 ± 0.022 ± 0.007</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AO BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses B(T(4S) → B<sup>+</sup>B<sup>-</sup>) = (51.4 ± 0.6)% and B(T(4S) → B<sup>0</sup>B<sup>0</sup>) = (48.6 ± 0.6)%.

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to K_2^*(1430)^0 \gamma)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.08 ± 0.15 ± 0.01</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>04U BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to X_5 \gamma)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.0094 ± 0.0174 ± 0.0047</td><td>1 WATANUKI</td><td>19 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Using a sum-of-exclusive technique with m<sub>X<sub>5</sub></sub> < 2.8 GeV/c².

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to \rho^+ \pi^-)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.13 ± 0.06 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr><tr><td>0.09<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.06</sub> ± 0.04</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>13J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.21 ± 0.08 ± 0.04</td><td>1 KUSAKA</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.03 ± 0.07 ± 0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AA BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13J</td></tr><tr><td>-0.02 ± 0.16<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.02</sub></td><td>WANG</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by KUSAKA 07</td></tr><tr><td>-0.18 ± 0.08 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03T BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AA</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of B<sup>0</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays.

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to \rho^- \pi^+)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.08 ± 0.08 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.12 ± 0.08<sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.05</sub></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>13J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.08 ± 0.16 ± 0.11</td><td>1 KUSAKA</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.37 ± 0.16<sup>+0.09</sup><sub>-0.10</sub></td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AA BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13J</td></tr><tr><td>-0.53 ± 0.29<sup>+0.09</sup><sub>-0.04</sub></td><td>WANG</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by KUSAKA 07</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of B<sup>0</sup> → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup> decays.

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to a_1(1260) \pm \pi \bar{\pi})$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.07 ± 0.06 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.06 ± 0.05 ± 0.07</td><td>DALSENO</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.07 ± 0.07 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07O BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to b_1^- \pi^+)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.05 ± 0.10 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BI BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to p \bar{p} K^*(892)^0)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.05 ± 0.12 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.08 ± 0.20 ± 0.02</td><td>CHEN</td><td>08C BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.11 ± 0.13 ± 0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to p \bar{\lambda} \pi^-)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.04 ± 0.07 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.10 ± 0.10 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09AC BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.02 ± 0.10 ± 0.03</td><td>WANG</td><td>07C BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.05 ± 0.10 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.02 ± 0.20 ± 0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09T BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.08 ± 0.12 ± 0.02</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to K^* \ell^+ e^-)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.21 ± 0.19 ± 0.02</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$A_{CP}(B^0 \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-)$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.034 ± 0.024 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.035 ± 0.024 ± 0.003</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14AN LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.00 ± 0.15 ± 0.03</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>-0.072 ± 0.040 ± 0.005</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13E LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14AN</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$C_{D^*}(2010)^- D^+ (B^0 \to D^* (2010)^- D^+)^+$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.02 ± 0.08 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.028 ± 0.130 ± 0.026</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20L LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.13 ± 0.16 ± 0.05</td><td>2 ROHRKEN</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.00 ± 0.17 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.23 ± 0.25 ± 0.06</td><td>3 AUSHEV</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.23 ± 0.15 ± 0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AI BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09C</td></tr><tr><td>0.17 ± 0.24 ± 0.04</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05Z BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AI</td></tr><tr><td>-0.22 ± 0.37 ± 0.10</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03J BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,B 05Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20L reports the measurements of C = -0.059 ± 0.092 ± 0.020 and ΔC = -0.031 ± 0.092 ± 0.016 such that C<sub>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)</sub>-D<sup>+</sup> = C - ΔC.

²ROHRKEN 12 reports the measurements of C = -0.01 ± 0.11 ± 0.04 and ΔC = 0.12 ± 0.11 ± 0.03 such that C<sub>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)</sub>-D<sup>+</sup> = C - ΔC.

³Combines results from fully and partially reconstructed B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>±</sup> D<sup>∓</sup> decays.

$$S_{D^*}(2010)^- D^+ (B^0 \to D^* (2010)^- D^+)^+$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.83 ± 0.09 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.880 ± 0.107 ± 0.022</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20L LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.65 ± 0.22 ± 0.07</td><td>2 ROHRKEN</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.73 ± 0.23 ± 0.050</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.96 ± 0.43 ± 0.12</td><td>3 AUSHEV</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.44 ± 0.22 ± 0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AI BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09C</td></tr><tr><td>-0.29 ± 0.33 ± 0.07</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05Z BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AI</td></tr><tr><td>-0.24 ± 0.69 ± 0.12</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03J BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,B 05Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20L reports the measurements of S = -0.861 ± 0.077 ± 0.019 and ΔS = 0.019 ± 0.075 ± 0.012 such that S<sub>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)</sub>-D<sup>+</sup> = S - ΔS.

²ROHRKEN 12 reports the measurements of S = -0.78 ± 0.15 ± 0.05 and ΔS = -0.13 ± 0.15 ± 0.04 such that S<sub>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)</sub>+D<sup>+</sup> = S - ΔS.

³Combines results from fully and partially reconstructed B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>±</sup> D<sup>∓</sup> decays.

$$C_{D^*}(2010)^+ D^+ (B^0 \to D^* (2010)^+ D^+)^+$$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.03 ± 0.09 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.090 ± 0.130 ± 0.026</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20L LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.11 ± 0.14 ± 0.06</td><td>2 ROHRKEN</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.08 ± 0.17 ± 0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.37 ± 0.22 ± 0.06</td><td>3 AUSHEV</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.18 ± 0.15 ± 0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AI BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09C</td></tr><tr><td>0.09 ± 0.25 ± 0.06</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05Z BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AI</td></tr><tr><td>-0.47 ± 0.40 ± 0.12</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03J BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,B 05Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20L reports the measurements of C = -0.059 ± 0.092 ± 0.020 and ΔC = -0.031 ± 0.092 ± 0.016 such that C<sub>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)</sub>+D<sup>+</sup> = C - ΔC.

²ROHRKEN 12 reports the measurements of C = -0.01 ± 0.11 ± 0.04 and ΔC = 0.12 ± 0.11 ± 0.03 such that C<sub>D<sup>*</sup>(2010)</sub>+D<sup>+</sup> = C + ΔC.

³Combines results from fully and partially reconstructed B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>±</sup> D<sup>∓</sup> decays.
## $S_{D^*(2010)+D^-} (B^0 \to D^*(2010)+D^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.80 ±0.09</strong></td><td><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.842 ±0.107 ±0.022</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20L</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.90 ±0.21 ±0.07</td><td>2 ROHRKEN</td><td>12</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.62 ±0.21 ±0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.55 ±0.39 ±0.12</td><td>3 AUSHEV</td><td>04</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

-0.79 ±0.21 ±0.06 AUBERT 07AI BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09C

-0.54 ±0.35 ±0.07 AUBERT,B 05Z BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07AI

-0.82 ±0.75 ±0.14 AUBERT 03J BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 05Z

¹AAIJ 20L reports the measurements of $S = -0.861 \pm 0.077 \pm 0.019$ and $\Delta S = 0.019 \pm 0.075 \pm 0.012$ such that $S_{D^*(2010)+D^-} = S + \Delta S$.

²ROHRKEN 12 reports the measurements of $S = -0.78 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.05$ and $\Delta S = -0.13 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.04$ such that $S_{D^*(2010)+D^-} = S + \Delta S$.

³Combines results from fully and partially reconstructed $B^0 \to D^*\pm D^\mp$ decays.

## $C_{D^+D^-} (B^0 \to D^+D^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.01 ±0.09</strong></td><td><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.15 ±0.08 ±0.04</td><td>1,2 KRONENBIT...12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>+0.15 ±0.09 ±0.04</td><td>3 LEES</td><td>12AF</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.05 ±0.09 ±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

-0.15 ±0.13 ±0.04 ²VERVINK 09 BELL Repl. by KRONENBITTER 12

-0.02 ±0.11 ±0.02 ¹AUBERT 07BO BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09C

-0.26 ±0.26 ±0.06 ²MIYAKE 05 BELL Repl. by VERVINK 09

-0.28 ±0.23 ±0.02 ³AUBERT 03Q BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07BO

¹Assumes both CP-even and CP-odd states having the CP asymmetry.

²Belle Collab. quotes $A_{D^+D^-}$ which is equal to $-C_{D^+D^-}$.

³Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one $D^0$ meson is not explicitly reconstructed. Analysis does not separate CP-even and CP-odd component.

⁴AUBERT 03Q reports $|\lambda|=0.75 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.02$ and $\text{Im}(\lambda)=0.05 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.10$. We convert them to S and C parameters taking into account correlations.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.01±0.09 (Error scaled by 1.6)

<figure><img src="image_612.png" /></figure>

## $S_{D^+D^-} (B^0 \to D^+D^-)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.59±0.14</strong></td><td><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.8. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.79 ±0.13 ±0.03</td><td>1 KRONENBIT...12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.34 ±0.12 ±0.05</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12AF</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.70 ±0.16 ±0.03</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

-0.96 ±0.25<sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.16</sub> VERVINK 09 BELL Repl. by KRONENBITTER 12

-0.66 ±0.19 ±0.04 ¹AUBERT 07BO BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09C

-0.75 ±0.56 ±0.12 ²MIYAKE 05 BELL Repl. by VERVINK 09

-0.06 ±0.37 ±0.13 ³AUBERT 03Q BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07BO

¹Assumes both CP-even and CP-odd states having the CP asymmetry.

²Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one $D^0$ meson is not explicitly reconstructed. Analysis does not separate CP-even and CP-odd component.

³AUBERT 03Q reports $|\lambda|=0.75 \pm 0.19 \pm 0.02$ and $\text{Im}(\lambda)=0.05 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.10$. We convert them to S and C parameters taking into account correlations.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
-0.59±0.14 (Error scaled by 1.8)

<figure><img src="image_613.png" /></figure>

## $C_+(B^0 \to D^+D^-)$

See the note in the $C_{\pi\pi}$ datablock, but for CP even final state.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.00±0.10</strong></td><td><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.18 ±0.10 ±0.05</td><td>1 KRONENBIT...12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>+0.15 ±0.09 ±0.04</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>12AF</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.00 ±0.12 ±0.02</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

-0.05 ±0.14 ±0.02 AUBERT 07BO BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09C

-0.06 ±0.17 ±0.03 ³AUBERT,BE 05A BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07BO

¹Belle Collab. quotes $A_{D^+D^-}$ which is equal to $-C_{D^+D^-}$.

²Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one $D^0$ meson is not explicitly reconstructed. Extracted under assumption of equal $C_+$ and $C_-$.

³AUBERT,BE 05A reports a CP-odd fraction $R_\perp = 0.125 \pm 0.044 \pm 0.007$.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.00±0.10 (Error scaled by 1.6)

<figure><img src="image_614.png" /></figure>

## $S_+(B^0 \to D^+D^-)$

See the note in the $S_{\pi\pi}$ datablock, but for CP even final state.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.73±0.09</strong></td><td><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.81 ±0.13 ±0.03</td><td>KRONENBIT...12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.49 ±0.18 ±0.08</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12AF</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.76 ±0.16 ±0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

-0.72 ±0.19 ±0.05 AUBERT 07BO BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09C

-0.75 ±0.25 ±0.03 ²AUBERT,BE 05A BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07BO

¹Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one $D^0$ meson is not explicitly reconstructed. Analysis does not separate CP-even and CP-odd component. Value is obtained from $S = -0.34 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.05$ using $S = S_+ (1 - 2 R_\perp)$ with $R_\perp = 0.158 \pm 0.029$.

²AUBERT,BE 05A reports a CP-odd fraction $R_\perp = 0.125 \pm 0.044 \pm 0.007$.

## $C_-(B^0 \to D^+D^-)$

See the note in the $C_{\pi\pi}$ datablock, but for CP odd final state.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.19±0.31</strong></td><td><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.05 ±0.39 ±0.08</td><td>1 KRONENBIT...12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.41 ±0.49 ±0.08</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.23 ± 0.67 ± 0.10</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07B0</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09C</td></tr><tr><td>-0.20 ± 0.96 ± 0.11</td><td>2 AUBERT,BE</td><td>05A</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07B0</td></tr></table>

¹Belle Collab. quotes $A_{D^+D^-}^+$ which is equal to $-C_{D^+D^-}$.

²AUBERT,BE 05A reports a CP-odd fraction $R_⊥ = 0.125 ± 0.044 ± 0.007$.

### S<sub>-</sub> (B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>+</sup>D<sup>-</sup>)

See the note in the $S_{ππ}$ datablock, but for CP odd final state.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.1 ± 1.6</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 3.5.</td></tr><tr><td>1.52 ± 0.62 ± 0.12</td><td>KRONENBIT...</td><td>12</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-1.80 ± 0.70 ± 0.16</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-1.83 ± 1.04 ± 0.23</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07B0</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09C</td></tr><tr><td>-1.75 ± 1.78 ± 0.22</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>05A</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07B0</td></tr></table>

¹AUBERT,BE 05A reports a CP-odd fraction $R_⊥ = 0.125 ± 0.044 ± 0.007$.

### C (B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>+</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> + D<sup>-</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.01 ± 0.28 ± 0.09</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 DALSENO</td><td>07</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Reports value of A which is equal to $-C$.

### S (B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>+</sup>(2010)<sup>+</sup> + D<sup>-</sup>(2010)<sup>-</sup> K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.06 ± 0.45<br>-0.44 ± 0.06</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 DALSENO</td><td>07</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹This value includes an unknown CP dilution factor D due to possible contributions from intermediate resonances and different partial waves.

### C<sub>D+D<sup>-</sup></sub> (B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>+</sup>D<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.22 ± 0.24</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.5. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>0.26<sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.17</sub> ± 0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AN</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.43 ± 0.16 ± 0.05</td><td>ROHRKEN</td><td>12</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-0.07 ± 0.23 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-0.91 ± 0.23 ± 0.06</td><td>1 FRATINA</td><td>07</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.11 ± 0.35 ± 0.06</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>052</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AI</td></tr><tr><td>0.11 ± 0.22 ± 0.07</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AI</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09C</td></tr></table>

¹The paper reports A, which is equal to $-C$.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
-0.22±0.24 (Error scaled by 2.5)

<figure><img src="image_615.png" /></figure>

### S<sub>D+D<sup>-</sup></sub> (B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>+</sup>D<sup>-</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.76<sup>+0.15</sup><sub>-0.13</sub></strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.54<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.16</sub> ± 0.05</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AN</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-1.06<sup>+0.21</sup><sub>-0.14</sub> ± 0.08</td><td>ROHRKEN</td><td>12</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-0.63 ± 0.36 ± 0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09C</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-1.13 ± 0.37 ± 0.09</td><td>FRATINA</td><td>07</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.54 ± 0.34 ± 0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AI</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09C</td></tr><tr><td>-0.29 ± 0.63 ± 0.06</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05Z</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AI</td></tr></table>

### C<sub>J/ψ(1S)π<sup>0</sup></sub> (B<sup>0</sup> → J/ψ(1S)π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.03 ± 0.17</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.5.</td></tr><tr><td>0.15 ± 0.14<sup>+0.04</sup><sub>-0.03</sub></td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-0.20 ± 0.19 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AU</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-0.08 ± 0.16 ± 0.05</td><td>1</td><td>LEE</td><td>08A BELL Repl. by PAL 18</td></tr><tr><td>-0.21 ± 0.26 ± 0.06</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AU</td></tr><tr><td>0.01 ± 0.29 ± 0.03</td><td>1</td><td>04</td><td>BELL Repl. by LEE 08A</td></tr><tr><td>0.38 ± 0.41 ± 0.09</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03N</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 06B</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BELLE Collab. quotes $A_{J/ψπ^0}$ which is equal to $-C_{J/ψπ^0}$.

### S<sub>J/ψ(1S)π<sup>0</sup></sub> (B<sup>0</sup> → J/ψ(1S)π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.88 ± 0.32</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.2.</td></tr><tr><td>-0.59 ± 0.19 ± 0.03</td><td>PAL</td><td>18</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-1.23 ± 0.21 ± 0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08AU</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-0.65 ± 0.21 ± 0.05</td><td>LEE</td><td>08A</td><td>BELL Repl. by PAL 18</td></tr><tr><td>-0.68 ± 0.30 ± 0.04</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06B</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AU</td></tr><tr><td>-0.72 ± 0.42 ± 0.09</td><td>KATAOKA</td><td>04</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEE 08A</td></tr><tr><td>0.05 ± 0.49 ± 0.16</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03N</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 06B</td></tr></tbody></table>

### C(B<sup>0</sup> → J/ψ(1S)ρ<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.063 ± 0.056<sup>+0.019</sup><sub>-0.014</sub></strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1</td><td>15J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Time-dependent CP violation is measured in the $B^0 → J/ψρ^0$ and was used to limit the size of penguin amplitude contributions to $\phi_S$ in $B_S^0 → J/ψφ$ decays to be between [-1.05°, 1.18°] at 95% confidence level.

### S(B<sup>0</sup> → J/ψ(1S)ρ<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.66<sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.12</sub></strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1</td><td>15J</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Time-dependent CP violation is measured in the $B^0 → J/ψρ^0$ and was used to limit the size of penguin amplitude contributions to $\phi_S$ in $B_S^0 → J/ψφ$ decays to be between [-1.05°, 1.18°] at 95% confidence level.

### C<sub>D<sup>(*)</sup>CP</sub> h<sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>(*)</sup>CP h<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.02 ± 0.07 ± 0.03</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1</td><td>ABDESSALAM 15</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.23 ± 0.16 ± 0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AJ</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by ABDESSALAM 15</td></tr></table>

¹BABAR and BELLE combined analysis uses CP-eigenstate decay modes $D^0 → K^+K^-$, $K_S^0π^0$, $K_S^0ω$, and $h^0 = π^0$, $η$, $ω$.

### S<sub>D<sup>(*)</sup>CP</sub> h<sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → D<sup>(*)</sup>CP h<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>-0.66 ± 0.10 ± 0.06</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1</td><td>ABDESSALAM 15</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.56 ± 0.23 ± 0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AJ</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by ABDESSALAM 15</td></tr></table>

¹BABAR and BELLE combined analysis uses CP-eigenstate decay modes $D^0 → K^+K^-$, $K_S^0π^0$, $K_S^0ω$, and $h^0 = π^0$, $η$, $ω$.

### C<sub>K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup></sub> (B<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.00 ± 0.08</strong> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.01 ± 0.12 ± 0.04</td><td>1</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>24</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-0.14 ± 0.13 ± 0.06</td><td>2</td><td>FUJIKAWA</td><td>10A</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-0.13 ± 0.13 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09I</td><td>BABR $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.06 ± 0.15 ± 0.04</td><td>3</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>24</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>-0.04<sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.15</sub> ± 0.05</td><td>4</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>23E</td><td>BELL $e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr><tr><td>0.24 ± 0.15 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09I</td></tr><tr><td>0.05 ± 0.14 ± 0.05</td><td>2</td><td>CHAO</td><td>07</td><td>BELL Repl. by FUJIKAWA 10A</td></tr><tr><td>0.06 ± 0.18 ± 0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>05Y</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08E</td></tr><tr><td>-0.16 ± 0.29 ± 0.05</td><td>2,5</td><td>CHAO</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHEN 05B</td></tr><tr><td>0.11 ± 0.20 ± 0.09</td><td>2</td><td>CHEN</td><td>05B</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHAO 07</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03 ± 0.36 ± 0.11</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04M</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 04M</td></tr><tr><td>0.40<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.28</sub> ± 0.09</td><td>6</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>04M</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05Y</td></tr></table>

¹This is the combined result of this analysis (ADACHI 24) and ADACHI 23E.

²Reports A which is equal to $-C$.

³The measurement is using BELL II data reported in ADACHI 24. The combination with ADACHI 23E is also reported.

⁴The result has been combined with ADACHI 24.

⁵Corresponds to a 90% CL interval of $-0.33 < A_{CP} < 0.64$.

⁶Based on a total signal yield of 122 ± 16 events.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

### S<sub>K</sub><sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)

VALUE

0.64±0.13 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>0.75<sup>+0.20</sup><sub>-0.23</sub>±0.04</td></tr><tr><td>0.67±0.31±0.08</td></tr><tr><td>0.55±0.20±0.03</td></tr></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ADACHI</td><td>23E</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>FUJIKAWA</td><td>10A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09I</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.40±0.23±0.03</td></tr><tr><td>0.33±0.35±0.08</td></tr><tr><td>0.35<sup>+0.30</sup><sub>-0.33</sub>±0.04</td></tr><tr><td>0.32±0.61±0.13</td></tr><tr><td>0.48<sup>+0.38</sup><sub>-0.47</sub>±0.06</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>08E</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09I</td></tr><tr><td>CHAO</td><td>07</td><td>BELL Repl. by FUJIKAWA 10A</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>05Y</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08E</td></tr><tr><td>CHEN</td><td>05B</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHAO 07</td></tr><tr><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04M</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05Y</td></tr></table>

¹Based on a total signal yield of 122 ± 16 events.

### C<sub>η</sub>′(958) K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → η'(958) K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)

See updated measurements in C<sub>η</sub>' K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>

VALUE

-0.04±0.20 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>05M</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>CHEN</td><td>05B</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.26±0.22±0.03</td></tr><tr><td>0.01±0.16±0.04</td></tr><tr><td>0.10±0.22±0.04</td></tr><tr><td>-0.13±0.32<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.09</sub></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1 ABE</td><td>03C</td><td>BELL Repl. by ABE 03H</td></tr><tr><td>1 ABE</td><td>03H</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHEN 05B</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>03W</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05M</td></tr><tr><td>1 CHEN</td><td>02B</td><td>BELL Repl. by ABE 03C</td></tr></table>

¹BELLE Collab. quotes A<sub>η'(958)</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> which is equal to -C<sub>η'(958)</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>.

### S<sub>η</sub>'(958) K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → η'(958) K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)

See updated measurements in S<sub>η</sub>' K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>

VALUE

0.43±0.17 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>05M</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>CHEN</td><td>05B</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.71±0.37<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.06</sub></td></tr><tr><td>0.43±0.27±0.05</td></tr><tr><td>0.02±0.34±0.03</td></tr><tr><td>0.28±0.55<sup>+0.07</sup><sub>-0.08</sub></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>ABE</td><td>03C</td><td>BELL Repl. by ABE 03H</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>03H</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHEN 05B</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>03W</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05M</td></tr><tr><td>CHEN</td><td>02B</td><td>BELL Repl. by ABE 03C</td></tr></table>

### C<sub>η</sub>' K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → η' K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)

VALUE

-0.06±0.04 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>-0.03±0.05±0.04</td></tr><tr><td>-0.08±0.06±0.02</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1 SANTELJ</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09I</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.16±0.07±0.03</td></tr><tr><td>0.01±0.07±0.05</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07A</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09I</td></tr><tr><td>1,2 CHEN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL Repl. by SANTELJ 14</td></tr></table>

¹The paper reports A, which is equal to -C.

²The mixing-induced CP violation is reported with a significance of more than 5 standard deviations in this b → s penguin dominated mode.

### S<sub>η</sub>' K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → η' K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)

VALUE

0.63±0.06 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>0.68±0.07±0.03</td></tr><tr><td>0.57±0.08±0.02</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>SANTELJ</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09I</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.58±0.10±0.03</td></tr><tr><td>0.64±0.10±0.04</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07A</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09I</td></tr><tr><td>1 CHEN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL Repl. by SANTELJ 14</td></tr></table>

¹The mixing-induced CP violation is reported with a significance of more than 5 standard deviations in this b → s penguin dominated mode.

### C<sub>ω</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → ω K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)

VALUE

0.0 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>0.36±0.19±0.05</td></tr><tr><td>-0.52<sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.20</sub>±0.03</td></tr></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09I</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.09±0.29±0.06</td></tr><tr><td>-0.55<sup>+0.28</sup><sub>-0.26</sub>±0.03</td></tr><tr><td>-0.27±0.48±0.15</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1 CHAO</td><td>07</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHOBANOVA 14</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06E</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09I</td></tr><tr><td>1 CHEN</td><td>05B</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHAO 07</td></tr></table>

¹Belle Collab. quotes A<sub>ω K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></sub> which is equal to -C<sub>ω K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></sub>.

### S<sub>ω</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → ω K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)

VALUE

0.70±0.21 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>0.91±0.32±0.05</td></tr><tr><td>0.55<sup>+0.26</sup><sub>-0.29</sub>±0.02</td></tr></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CHOBANOVA</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>09I</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.11±0.46±0.07</td></tr><tr><td>0.51<sup>+0.35</sup><sub>-0.39</sub>±0.02</td></tr><tr><td>0.76±0.65<sup>+0.13</sup><sub>-0.16</sub></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>CHAO</td><td>07</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHOBANOVA 14</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>06E</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09I</td></tr><tr><td>CHEN</td><td>05B</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHAO 07</td></tr></table>

### C (B<sup>0</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> π<sup>0</sup> π<sup>0</sup>)

VALUE

-0.21±0.20 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>-0.28±0.21±0.04</td></tr><tr><td>0.23±0.52±0.13</td></tr></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 YUSA</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AQ BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Reports value of A which is equal to -C.

### S (B<sup>0</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> π<sup>0</sup> π<sup>0</sup>)

VALUE

0.89<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.30</sub> OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>0.92<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.31</sub>±0.11</td></tr><tr><td>0.72±0.71±0.08</td></tr></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>YUSA</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AQ BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### C<sub>ρ</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → ρ<sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)

VALUE

-0.04±0.20 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>-0.05±0.26±0.10</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03<sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.23</sub>±0.15</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2,3 DALSENO</td><td>09 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.64±0.41±0.20</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07F</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AU</td></tr></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

²Quotes A<sub>ρ(KS)</sub><sup>0</sup> which is equal to -C<sub>ρ(KS)</sub><sup>0</sup>.

³Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays and the first of two consistent solutions that may be preferred.

### S<sub>ρ</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → ρ<sup>0</sup> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)

VALUE

0.50<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.21</sub> OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>0.35<sup>+0.26</sup><sub>-0.31</sub>±0.07</td></tr><tr><td>0.64<sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.25</sub>±0.13</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2 DALSENO</td><td>09 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.20±0.52±0.24</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07F</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AU</td></tr></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

²Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays and the first of two consistent solutions that may be preferred.

### C<sub>f<sub>0</sub>(980)</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → f<sub>0</sub>(980) K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)

VALUE

0.29±0.20 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>0.28±0.24±0.09</td></tr><tr><td>0.30±0.29±0.14</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2,3 NAKAHAMA</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.08±0.19±0.05</td></tr><tr><td>0.06±0.17±0.11</td></tr><tr><td>-0.41±0.23±0.07</td></tr><tr><td>0.15±0.15±0.07</td></tr><tr><td>0.39±0.27±0.09</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>09AU BABR Repl. by LEES 120</td></tr><tr><td>2,5 DALSENO</td><td>09 BELL Repl. by NAKAHAMA 10</td></tr><tr><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07AX BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AU</td></tr><tr><td>2 CHAO</td><td>07 BELL Repl. by DALSENO 09</td></tr><tr><td>2 CHEN</td><td>05B BELL Repl. by CHAO 07</td></tr></table>

¹Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B<sup>0</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> decay.

²Quotes A<sub>f<sub>0</sub>(980)</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> which is equal to -C<sub>f<sub>0</sub>(980)</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>.

³Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B<sup>0</sup> → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup> decays and the first of four consistent solutions that may be preferred.

⁴Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

⁵Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B<sup>0</sup> → K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup> decays and the first of two consistent solutions that may be preferred.

### S<sub>f<sub>0</sub>(980)</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> (B<sup>0</sup> → f<sub>0</sub>(980) K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)

VALUE

-0.50±0.16 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>-0.55±0.18±0.12</td></tr><tr><td>-0.43<sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.20</sub>±0.14</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2 DALSENO</td><td>09 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ \begin{array}{l} -0.96^{+0.21}_{-0.04} \pm 0.04 \\ -0.25 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.10 \\ 0.18 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.11 \\ 0.47 \pm 0.41 \pm 0.08 \end{array} $$

<table>
  <tr>
    <td><sup>3</sup>AUBERT</td>
    <td>09AU BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by LEES 120</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><sup>4</sup>AUBERT</td>
    <td>07AX BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AU</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>CHAO</td>
    <td>07 BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by DALSENO 09</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>CHEN</td>
    <td>05B BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by CHAO 07</td>
  </tr>
</table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_0^S K^+ K^-$ decay.

2 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K_0^{\pi^+ \pi^-}$ decays and the first of two consistent solutions that may be preferred.

3 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K_0^{\pi^+ \pi^-}$ decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

4 Reports $\beta_{eff}$. We quote S obtained from epas: E-PRLTAO-99-076741.

$$ S_{f_2(1270) K_S^0} (B^0 \to f_2(1270) K_S^0) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ -0.48 \pm 0.52 \pm 0.12 \end{array} $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>09AU BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K_0^{\pi^+ \pi^-}$ decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

$$ C_{f_2(1270) K_S^0} (B^0 \to f_2(1270) K_S^0) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ 0.28^{+0.35}_{-0.40} \pm 0.11 \end{array} $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>09AU BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K_0^{\pi^+ \pi^-}$ decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

$$ S_{f_3(1300) K_S^0} (B^0 \to f_3(1300) K_S^0) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ -0.20 \pm 0.52 \pm 0.10 \end{array} $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>09AU BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K_0^{\pi^+ \pi^-}$ decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

$$ C_{f_3(1300) K_S^0} (B^0 \to f_3(1300) K_S^0) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ 0.13^{+0.33}_{-0.35} \pm 0.10 \end{array} $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>09AU BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K_0^{\pi^+ \pi^-}$ decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

$$ S_{K^0 \pi^+ \pi^-} (B^0 \to K^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \text{ nonresonant}) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ -0.01 \pm 0.31 \pm 0.10 \end{array} $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>09AU BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K_0^{\pi^+ \pi^-}$ decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

$$ C_{K^0 \pi^+ \pi^-} (B^0 \to K^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \text{ nonresonant}) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ 0.01 \pm 0.25 \pm 0.08 \end{array} $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>09AU BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K_0^{\pi^+ \pi^-}$ decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

$$ C_{K_S^0 K_S^0} (B^0 \to K_S^0 K_S^0) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ 0.0 \pm 0.4 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array} $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td colspan="3">Error includes scale factor of 1.4.</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

$$ \begin{array}{l} 0.38 \pm 0.38 \pm 0.05 \\ -0.40 \pm 0.41 \pm 0.06 \end{array} $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>1 NAKAHAMA</td>
      <td>08 BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>2 AUBERT,BE</td>
      <td>06C BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

1 Reports $A_{K_S^0 K_S^0}$ which equals to $-C_{K_S^0 K_S^0}$.

$$ S_{K_S^0 K_S^0} (B^0 \to K_S^0 K_S^0) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ -0.8 \pm 0.5 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array} $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>NAKAHAMA</td>
      <td>08 BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>AUBERT,BE</td>
      <td>06C BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

$$ \begin{array}{l} -0.38^{+0.69}_{-0.77} \pm 0.09 \\ -1.28^{+0.80}_{-0.73} \pm 0.11 \end{array} $$

$$ C_{K+\kappa-K_S^0} (B^0 \to K^+K^-K_S^0 \text{ nonresonant}) $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ 0.06 \pm 0.08 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array} $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>0.02 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.03</td>
      <td>1,2 LEES</td>
      <td>120 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>0.14 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.09</td>
      <td>3,4 NAKAHAMA</td>
      <td>10 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_0^S K^+ K^-$ decay.

2 This measurement is performed on all the isobar components, excluding $\phi K_S^0$ and $f_0(980) K_S^0$.

3 Quotes $A_{K^+K^-K_S^0}$ which is equal to $-C_{K^+K^-K_S^0}$.

4 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K_S^0 K^+ K^-$ decays and the first of four consistent solutions that may be preferred.

5 Excludes the events from $B^0 \to \phi K_S^0$ decay. The results are derived from a combined sample of $K^+K^-K_S^0$ and $K^+K^-K_L^0$ decays.

$$ S_{K^+K^-K_S^0} (B^0 \to K^+K^-K_S^0 \text{ nonresonant}) $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>-0.66 ± 0.11</td>
      <td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>-0.65 ± 0.12 ± 0.03</td>
      <td>1,2 LEES</td>
      <td>120 BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>-0.68 ± 0.15 ± 0.21</td>
      <td>3 CHAO</td>
      <td>07 BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ \begin{array}{l} -0.764 \pm 0.111^{+0.071}_{-0.040} \\ -0.42 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.03 \\ -0.49 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.04 \\ -0.56 \pm 0.25 \pm 0.04 \\ -0.49 \pm 0.43 \pm 0.11 \\ -0.51 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.05 \end{array} $$

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>3,4 AUBERT</td>
    <td>07AX BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by LEES 120</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>3,5 AUBERT</td>
    <td>05T BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AX</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>CHEN</td>
    <td>05B BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by CHAO 07</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>3,6 AUBERT,B</td>
    <td>04V BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by AUBERT 05T</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>ABE</td>
    <td>03C BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by ABE 03H</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>3,7 ABE</td>
    <td>03H BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by CHEN 05B</td>
  </tr>
</table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_0^S K^+ K^-$ decay.

2 This measurement is performed on all the isobar components, excluding $\phi K_S^0$ and $f_0(980) K_S^0$. Note that the nonresonant component is not a CP eigenstate.

3 Excludes events from $B^0 \to \phi K_S^0$ decay. The results are derived from a combined sample of $K^+K^-K_S^0$ and $K^+K^-K_L^0$ decays.

4 Reports $\beta_{eff}$. We quote S obtained from epas: E-PRLTAO-99-076741.

5 The measured CP-even final states fraction is 0.89 ± 0.08 ± 0.06.

6 The measured CP-even final states fraction is 0.98 ± 0.15 ± 0.04.

7 The measured CP-even final states fraction is 1.03 ± 0.15 ± 0.05.

$$ C_{K^+K^-K_S^0} (B^0 \to K^+K^-K_S^0 \text{ inclusive}) $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>0.015 ± 0.077 ± 0.053</td>
      <td>1,2 AUBERT</td>
      <td>07AX BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

1 Measured using full Dalitz plot fit including $\phi$ component.

2 The results are derived from a combined sample of $K^+K^-K_S^0$ and $K^+K^-K_L^0$ decays.

$$ S_{K^+K^-K_S^0} (B^0 \to K^+K^-K_S^0 \text{ inclusive}) $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>-0.647 ± 0.116 ± 0.040</td>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>07AX BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

1 Measured using full Dalitz plot fit including $\phi$ component.

$$ C_{\phi K_S^0} (B^0 \to \phi K_S^0) $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>-0.09 ± 0.12</td>
      <td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>-0.31 ± 0.20 ± 0.05</td>
      <td>ADACHI</td>
      <td>231 BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>0.05 ± 0.18 ± 0.05</td>
      <td>1 LEES</td>
      <td>120 BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>-0.04 ± 0.20 ± 0.10</td>
      <td>2,3 NAKAHAMA</td>
      <td>10 BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ \begin{array}{l} 0.08 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.04 \\ 0.07 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.05 \\ 0.00 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.05 \\ -0.08 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.09 \\ 0.01 \pm 0.33 \pm 0.10 \\ 0.56 \pm 0.41 \pm 0.16 \\ 0.15 \pm 0.29 \pm 0.07 \end{array} $$

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>2,4 AUBERT</td>
    <td>07AX BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by LEES 120</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>2,4 CHEN</td>
    <td>07 BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by NAKAHAMA 10</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>4 AUBERT</td>
    <td>05T BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AX</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>2,4 CHEN</td>
    <td>05B BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by CHEN 07</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>4 AUBERT,B</td>
    <td>04G BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by AUBERT 05T</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>2 ABE</td>
    <td>03C BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by ABE 03H</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>2 ABE</td>
    <td>03H BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by CHEN 05B</td>
  </tr>
</table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_0^S K^+ K^-$ decay.

2 Quotes $A_{\phi K_S^0}$ which is equal to $-C_{\phi K_S^0}$.

3 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to K_S^0 K^+ K^-$ decays and the first of four consistent solutions that may be preferred.

4 Result combines B-meson final states $\phi K_S^0$ and $\phi K_L^0$ by assuming $S_{\phi K_S^0} = -S_{\phi K_L^0}$.

$$ S_{\phi K_S^0} (B^0 \to \phi K_S^0) $$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>0.58 ± 0.12</td>
      <td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>0.54 ± 0.26 ± 0.06</td>
      <td>ADACHI</td>
      <td>231 BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>0.66 ± 0.17 ± 0.07</td>
      <td>1 LEES</td>
      <td>120 BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>0.50 ± 0.21 ± 0.06</td>
      <td>2 CHEN</td>
      <td>07 BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ \begin{array}{l} 0.21 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.11 \\ 0.50 \pm 0.25 \pm 0.07 \\ 0.08 \pm 0.33 \pm 0.09 \\ 0.47 \pm 0.34 \pm 0.06 \\ -0.73 \pm 0.64 \pm 0.22 \\ -0.96 \pm 0.50 \pm 0.11 \end{array} $$

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>2,3 AUBERT</td>
    <td>07AX BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by LEES 120</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>2 AUBERT</td>
    <td>05T BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AX</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>2 CHEN</td>
    <td>05B BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by CHEN 07</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>2 AUBERT,B</td>
    <td>04G BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by AUBERT 05T</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>ABE</td>
    <td>03C BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by ABE 03H</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>ABE</td>
    <td>03H BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by CHEN 05B</td>
  </tr>
</table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the $B^0 \to K_0^S K^+ K^-$ decay.
²Result combines B-meson final states $\phi K_S^0$ and $\phi K_L^0$ by assuming $S_\phi K_S^0 = -S_\phi K_L^0$

³Reports $\beta_{eff}$. We quote S obtained from eqaps: E-PRLTAO-99-076741.

$C_{KS}K_S K_S(B^0 \to K_S K_S K_S)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.14±0.12 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.12±0.16±0.05</td><td>1 KANG</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.17±0.18±0.04</td><td>LEES</td><td>12I BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.02±0.21±0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AT BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 12I</td></tr><tr><td>-0.31±0.20±0.07</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>Repl. by KANG 21</td></tr><tr><td>-0.34±0.28<sup>+0.25</sup><sub>-0.25</sub>±0.05</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05 BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AT</td></tr><tr><td>-0.54±0.34±0.09</td><td>1 SUMISAWA</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHEN 07</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹KANG 21 quotes $A_{K_S^0 K_S^0 K_S^0}$ which is equal to $-C_{K_S^0 K_S^0 K_S^0}$.

$S_{KS}K_S K_S(B^0 \to K_S K_S K_S)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.82±0.17 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.71±0.23±0.05</td><td>KANG</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.94±0.24<sup>+0.21</sup><sub>-0.21</sub>±0.06</td><td>LEES</td><td>12I BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-0.71±0.24±0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AT BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 12I</td></tr><tr><td>0.30±0.32±0.08</td><td>CHEN</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>Repl. by KANG 21</td></tr><tr><td>-0.71±0.38<sup>+0.32</sup><sub>-0.32</sub>±0.04</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05 BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AT</td></tr><tr><td>1.26±0.68±0.20</td><td>SUMISAWA</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHEN 07.</td></tr></tbody></table>

$C_{K_S^0 \pi^0 \gamma}(B^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^0 \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.36±0.33±0.04</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.20±0.20±0.06</td><td>2,3 USHIRODA</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-1.0±0.5±0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>05P BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BA</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03±0.34±0.11</td><td>3 USHIRODA</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by USHIRODA 06</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Requires $1.1 < M_{K_S^0 \pi^0} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

²Requires $M_{K_S^0 \pi^0} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

³Reports $A_{K_S^0 \pi^0 \gamma}$, which is $-C_{K_S^0 \pi^0 \gamma}$.

$S_{K_S^0 \pi^0 \gamma}(B^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^0 \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.78±0.59±0.09</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-0.10±0.31±0.07</td><td>2 USHIRODA</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.9±1.0±0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>05P BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BA</td></tr><tr><td>-0.58±0.46<sup>+0.38</sup><sub>-0.38</sub>±0.11</td><td>USHIRODA</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by USHIRODA 06</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Requires $1.1 < M_{K_S^0 \pi^0} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

²Requires $M_{K_S^0 \pi^0} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

$C_{K_S^\pi \pi^- \gamma}(B^0 \to K_S^\pi \pi^- \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.39±0.20<sup>+0.03</sup><sub>-0.02</sub></td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">¹ Requires $M_{K_\pi \pi^-} < 1.8$ GeV/c², $0.6 \text{ GeV/c}^2 < m_{\pi^+\pi^-} < 0.9 \text{ GeV/c}^2$, $m_{K_\pi} < 0.845 \text{ GeV/c}^2$ or $m_{K_\pi} > 0.945 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.</td></tr></tbody></table>

$S_{K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \gamma}(B^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^- \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.14±0.25±0.03</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">¹ Requires $M_{K_\pi \pi^-} < 1.8$ GeV/c², $0.6 \text{ GeV/c}^2 < m_{\pi^+\pi^-} < 0.9 \text{ GeV/c}^2$, $m_{K_\pi} < 0.845 \text{ GeV/c}^2$ or $m_{K_\pi} > 0.945 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.</td></tr></tbody></table>

$C_{K^*(892)0} \gamma(B^0 \to K^*(892)0 \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.04±0.16 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.14±0.16±0.03</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.20±0.24±0.05</td><td>1,2 USHIRODA</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.40±0.23±0.03</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05P BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BA</td></tr><tr><td>-0.57±0.32±0.09</td><td>3 AUBERT,B</td><td>04Z BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,B 05P</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Requires $0.8 < M_{K_S^0 \pi^0} < 1.0$ GeV/c².

²Reports value of A which is equal to -C.

³Based on a total signal of 105 ± 14 events with $K^*(892)0 \to K_S^0 \pi^0$ only.

$S_{K^*(892)0} \gamma(B^0 \to K^*(892)0 \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.15±0.22 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03±0.29±0.03</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BA BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.32±0.36<sup>+0.33</sup><sub>-0.33</sub>±0.05</td><td>1 USHIRODA</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-0.21±0.40±0.05</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05P BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BA</td></tr><tr><td>-0.79±0.63<sup>+0.50</sup><sub>-0.50</sub>±0.10</td><td>2 USHIRODA</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by USHIRODA 06</td></tr><tr><td>0.25±0.63±0.14</td><td>3 AUBERT,B</td><td>04Z BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,B 05P</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Requires $0.8 < M_{K_S^0 \pi^0} < 1.0$ GeV/c².

²Assumes $C(B^0 \to K^*(892)0)^0_\gamma = 0$.

³Based on a total signal of 105 ± 14 events with $K^*(892)0 \to K_S^0 \pi^0$ only.

$C_{\eta K^0 \gamma}(B^0 \to \eta K^0 \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">0.1 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.48±0.41±0.07</td><td>1,2 NAKANO</td><td>18 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.32±0.40<sup>+0.39</sup><sub>-0.39</sub>±0.07</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>09 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assuming $m_{\eta K_S^0} < 2.1$ GeV.

²Reversed the sign for C=-A.

³Assuming $m_{\eta K} < 3.25$ GeV.

$S_{\eta K^0 \gamma}(B^0 \to \eta K^0 \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.5 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-1.32±0.77±0.36</td><td>1 NAKANO</td><td>18 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.18±0.49<sup>+0.46</sup><sub>-0.46</sub>±0.12</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assuming $m_{\eta K_S^0} < 2.1$ GeV.

²Assuming $m_{\eta K} < 3.25$ GeV.

$C_{K^0 \phi \gamma}(B^0 \to K^0 \phi \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.35±0.58<sup>+0.10</sup><sub>-0.23</sub></td><td>1 SAHOO</td><td>11A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Reports value of A, which is equal to -C.

$S_{K^0 \phi \gamma}(B^0 \to K^0 \phi \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.74±0.72<sup>+0.10</sup><sub>-0.15</sub>±0.24</td><td>SAHOO</td><td>11A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$C(B^0 \to K_S^0 \rho^0 \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.05±0.18±0.06</td><td>1,2 LI</td><td>08F BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Requires $M_{K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-} < 1.8 \text{ GeV/c}^2$ and $0.6 < M_{\pi^+ \pi^-} < 0.9 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.

²Reports value of $A_{eff}$ which is equal to -C, and includes the non-resonant $\pi^+\pi^-$ contribution in the $\rho^0$ region.

$C(B^0 \to K_S^0 \rho^0 \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.04±0.23 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.18±0.32<sup>+0.06</sup><sub>-0.05</sub></td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.11±0.33<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.09</sub></td><td>2 LI</td><td>08F BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Requires $M_{K_\pi \pi^-} < 1.8 \text{ GeV/c}^2$, $0.6 \text{ GeV/c}^2 < m_{\pi^+\pi^-} < 0.9 \text{ GeV/c}^2$, $m_{K_\pi} < 0.845 \text{ GeV/c}^2$ or $m_{K_\pi} > 0.945 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.

²Requires $M_{K_\pi \pi^-} < 1.8 \text{ GeV/c}^2$.

$C(B^0 \to \rho^0 \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.44±0.49±0.14</td><td>1 USHIRODA</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Reports value of A which is equal to -C.

$S(B^0 \to \rho^0 \gamma)$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>-0.83±0.65±0.18</td><td>USHIRODA</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$C_\pi \pi \gamma(B^0 \to \pi^+ \pi^-)$

$C_\pi \pi$ is defined as $(1-|\lambda|^2)/(1+|\lambda|^2)$, where the quantity $\lambda=q/p \overline{A_f}/A_f$ is a phase convention independent observable quantity for the final state $f$. For details, see the review on "CP Violation" in the Reviews section.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT_ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.314±0.030 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.311±0.045±0.015</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>210 LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.34±0.06±0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>180 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.33±0.06±0.03</td><td>1 DALSENO</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.25±0.08±0.02</td><td>LEES</td><td>13D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>-0.38</td><td>±0.15</td><td>±0.02</td></tr><tr><td>-0.21</td><td>±0.09</td><td>±0.02</td></tr><tr><td>-0.55</td><td>±0.08</td><td>±0.05</td></tr><tr><td>-0.56</td><td>±0.12</td><td>±0.06</td></tr><tr><td>-0.09</td><td>±0.15</td><td>±0.04</td></tr><tr><td>-0.58</td><td>±0.15</td><td>±0.07</td></tr><tr><td>-0.77</td><td>±0.27</td><td>±0.08</td></tr><tr><td>-0.94</td><td>+0.31<br/>-0.25</td><td>±0.09</td></tr><tr><td>-0.25</td><td>+0.45<br/>-0.47</td><td>±0.14</td></tr><tr><td>-0.30</td><td>±0.25</td><td>±0.04</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>13B0 LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 180</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AF BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13D</td></tr><tr><td>1 ISHINO</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>Repl. by DALSEN0 13</td></tr><tr><td>1 ABE</td><td>05D BELL</td><td>Repl. by ISHINO 07</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT,BE</td><td>05B BELL</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AF</td></tr><tr><td>1 ABE</td><td>04E BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 05D</td></tr><tr><td>1 ABE</td><td>03G BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 04E.</td></tr><tr><td>1 ABE</td><td>02M BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 03G</td></tr><tr><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>02D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 02Q</td></tr><tr><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>02Q BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 05</td></tr></table>

¹Paper reports $A_{ππ}$ which equals to $-C_{ππ}$.

²Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-1.0 < C_{ππ} < 0.47$.

³Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.72 < C_{ππ} < 0.12$.

$S_{ππ}$ ($B^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-$)

$S_{ππ} = 2\text{Im}\lambda/(1+|\lambda|^2)$, see the note in the $C_{ππ}$ datablock above.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.670 ±0.030 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.706 ±0.042 ±0.013</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>210 LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.63 ±0.05 ±0.01</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>180 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-0.64 ±0.08 ±0.03</td><td>1 DALSEN0</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.68 ±0.10 ±0.03</td><td>LEES</td><td>13D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-0.71 ±0.13 ±0.02</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>13B0 LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 180</td></tr><tr><td>-0.60 ±0.11 ±0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AF BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13D</td></tr><tr><td>-0.61 ±0.10 ±0.04</td><td>ISHINO</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>Repl. by DALSEN0 13</td></tr><tr><td>-0.67 ±0.16 ±0.06</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>05D BELL</td><td>Repl. by ISHINO 07</td></tr><tr><td>-0.30 ±0.17 ±0.03</td><td>AUBERT,BE</td><td>05 BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AF</td></tr><tr><td>-1.00 ±0.21 ±0.07</td><td>3 ABE</td><td>04E BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 05D</td></tr><tr><td>-1.23 ±0.41 ±0.08<br/>-0.07</td><td>ABE</td><td>03G BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 04E.</td></tr><tr><td>-1.21 ±0.38 ±0.16<br/>-0.27</td><td>ABE</td><td>02M BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 03G</td></tr><tr><td>0.03 ±0.52<br/>-0.56</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>02D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 02Q</td></tr><tr><td>0.02 ±0.34 ±0.05</td><td>5 AUBERT</td><td>02Q BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 05</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹An isospin analysis using other BELLE measurements, disfavors the region of $23.8° < \phi_2 < 66.8°$ at 68% CL.

²Rule out the CP-conserving case, $C_{ππ} = S_{ππ} = 0$, at the 5.4 sigma level.

³Rule out the CP-conserving case, $C_{ππ} = S_{ππ} = 0$, at the 5.2 sigma level.

⁴Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.89 < S_{ππ} < 0.85$.

⁵Corresponds to 90% confidence range $-0.54 < S_{ππ} < 0.58$.

$C_{ππ}$ ($B^0 \to \pi^0\pi^0$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.30 ±0.20 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.14 ±0.46 ±0.07</td><td>1 AUBIDINEN</td><td>23E BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.14 ±0.36 ±0.10</td><td>1 JULIUS</td><td>17 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.43 ±0.26 ±0.05</td><td>LEES</td><td>13D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-0.49 ±0.35 ±0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BC BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13D</td></tr><tr><td>-0.12 ±0.56 ±0.06</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05L BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07BC</td></tr><tr><td>-0.44 ±0.52<br/>-0.53</td><td>1 CHAO</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by JULIUS 17</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Quotes $A_{ππ} \pi^0$ which is equal to $-C_{ππ} \pi^0$.

²Corresponds to a 90% CL interval of $-0.88 < A_{CP} < 0.64$.

$C_{ππ}$ ($B^0 \to \rho^+\pi^-$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.03 ±0.07 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.016 ±0.059 ±0.036</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>13J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.13 ±0.09 ±0.05</td><td>1 KUSAKA</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.15 ±0.09 ±0.05</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AA BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13J</td></tr><tr><td>0.25 ±0.17 ±0.02<br/>-0.06</td><td>WANG</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by KUSAKA 07</td></tr><tr><td>0.36 ±0.18 ±0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03T BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AA</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decays.

$S_{ππ}$ ($B^0 \to \rho^+\pi^-$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">0.05 ±0.07 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.053 ±0.081 ±0.034</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>13J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.06 ±0.13 ±0.05</td><td>1 KUSAKA</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-0.03 ±0.11 ±0.04</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AA BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13J</td></tr><tr><td>-0.28 ±0.23 ±0.10<br/>-0.08</td><td>WANG</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by KUSAKA 07</td></tr><tr><td>0.19 ±0.24 ±0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03T BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AA</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decays.

$\Delta C_{\rho\pi}$ ($B^0 \to \rho^+\pi^-$)

$\Delta C_{\rho\pi}$ describes the asymmetry between the rates $\Gamma(B^0 \to \rho^+\pi^-) + \Gamma(\bar{B}^0 \to \rho^-\pi^+) + \Gamma(B^0 \to \rho^-\pi^+) + \Gamma(\bar{B}^0 \to \rho^+\pi^-)$.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">0.27 ±0.06 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.234 ±0.061 ±0.048</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>13J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.36 ±0.10 ±0.05</td><td>1 KUSAKA</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.39 ±0.09 ±0.09</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AA BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13J</td></tr><tr><td>0.38 ±0.18 ±0.02<br/>-0.04</td><td>WANG</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by KUSAKA 07</td></tr><tr><td>0.28 ±0.18<br/>-0.19</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03T BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AA</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decays.

$\Delta S_{\rho\pi}$ ($B^0 \to \rho^+\pi^-$)

$\Delta S_{\rho\pi}$ is related to the strong phase difference between the amplitudes contributing to $B^0 \to \rho^+\pi^-$.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">0.01 ±0.08 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.054 ±0.082 ±0.039</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>13J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.08 ±0.13 ±0.05</td><td>1 KUSAKA</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-0.01 ±0.14 ±0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AA BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13J</td></tr><tr><td>-0.30 ±0.24 ±0.09</td><td>WANG</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by KUSAKA 07</td></tr><tr><td>0.15 ±0.25 ±0.03</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03T BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AA</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decays.

$C_{\rho\rho\pi^0}$ ($B^0 \to \rho^0\pi^0$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">0.27 ±0.24 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.19 ±0.23 ±0.15</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>13J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.49 ±0.36 ±0.28</td><td>1,2 KUSAKA</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-0.10 ±0.40 ±0.53</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AA BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13J</td></tr><tr><td>0.53 ±0.67 ±0.10<br/>-0.84 ±0.15</td><td>2 DRAGIC</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>Repl. by KUSAKA 07</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decays.

²Quotes $A_{\rho\rho\pi^0}$ which is equal to $-C_{\rho\rho\pi^0}$.

$S_{\rho\rho\pi^0}$ ($B^0 \to \rho^0\pi^0$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.23 ±0.34 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.37 ±0.34 ±0.20</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>13J BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.17 ±0.57 ±0.35</td><td>1,2 KUSAKA</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>0.04 ±0.44 ±0.18</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AA BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13J</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decays.

$C_{\rho\rho\pi}$ ($B^0 \to \rho_1(1260)^+\pi^-$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.05 ±0.11 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.01 ±0.11 ±0.09</td><td>DALSEN0</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.10 ±0.15 ±0.09</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07O BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$S_{\rho\rho\pi}$ ($B^0 \to \rho_1(1260)^+\pi^-$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.2 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.51 ±0.14 ±0.08</td><td>DALSEN0</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.37 ±0.21 ±0.07</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07O BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Delta C_{\rho\rho\pi}$ ($B^0 \to \rho_1(1260)^+\pi^-$)

$\Delta C_{\rho\rho\pi}$ describes the asymmetry between the rates $\Gamma(B^0 \to \rho_1^+\pi^-) + \Gamma(\bar{B}^0 \to \rho_1^+\pi^-)$ and $\Gamma(B^0 \to \rho_1^+\pi^-) + \Gamma(\bar{B}^0 \to \rho_1^+\pi^-)$.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">0.43 ±0.14 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>0.54 ±0.11 ±0.07</td><td>DALSEN0</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.26 ±0.15 ±0.07</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07O BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Delta S_{\rho\rho\pi}$ ($B^0 \to \rho_1(1260)^+\pi^-$)

$\Delta S_{\rho\rho\pi}$ is related to the strong phase difference between the amplitudes contributing to $B^0 \to \rho_1\pi$ decays.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.11 ±0.12 OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>-0.09 ±0.14 ±0.06</td><td>DALSEN0</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>-0.14 ±0.21 ±0.06</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07O BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$C$ ($B^0 \to b_1^+K^-$)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-weight: bold;">-0.22 ±0.23 ±0.05</td></tr><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>07BI BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

### ΔC (B⁰ → b₁⁻ π⁺)

**VALUE**

$-1.04 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.08$

**DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$AUBERT 07BI BABR e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

### C<sub>ρρ</sub>ρ<sub>ρ</sub>(B⁰ → ρ⁰ρ⁰)

**VALUE**

$0.2 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.3$

**DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$AUBERT 08BB BABR e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

### S<sub>ρρ</sub>ρ<sub>ρ</sub>(B⁰ → ρ⁰ρ⁰)

**VALUE**

$0.3 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.2$

**DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$AUBERT 08BB BABR e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

### C<sub>ρρ</sub>(B⁰ → ρ⁺ρ⁻)

**VALUE**

#### 0.00 ± 0.09 OUR AVERAGE

$0.00 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.06$

$0.01 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.06$

**DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$1 \text{ VANHOEFER } 16 \text{ BELL } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$1 \text{ SOMOV } 07 \text{ BELL } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$-0.16 \pm 0.21 \pm 0.08$

$-0.00 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.09$

$-0.03 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.09$

$-0.17 \pm 0.27 \pm 0.14$

$1 \text{ SOMOV } 07 \text{ BELL } \text{Repl. by VANHOEFER } 16$

$1 \text{ SOMOV } 06 \text{ BELL } \text{Repl. by SOMOV } 07$

$1 \text{ AUBERT, } 05C \text{ BABR } \text{Repl. by AUBERT } 07BF$

$1 \text{ AUBERT, } 04R \text{ BABR } \text{Repl. by AUBERT, } 05C$

¹BELLE Collab. quotes A<sub>CP</sub> which is equal to -C.

### S<sub>ρρ</sub>(B⁰ → ρ⁺ρ⁻)

**VALUE**

#### -0.14 ± 0.13 OUR AVERAGE

$-0.13 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.05$

$-0.17 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.05$

**DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$1 \text{ VANHOEFER } 16 \text{ BELL } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$1 \text{ SOMOV } 06 \text{ BELL } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$0.19 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.08$

$0.08 \pm 0.41 \pm 0.09$

$-0.33 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.08$

$-0.14 \pm 0.42 \pm 0.14$

$1 \text{ SOMOV } 07 \text{ BELL } \text{Repl. by VANHOEFER } 16$

$1 \text{ SOMOV } 06 \text{ BELL } \text{Repl. by SOMOV } 07$

$1 \text{ AUBERT, } 05C \text{ BABR } \text{Repl. by AUBERT } 07BF$

$1 \text{ AUBERT, } 04R \text{ BABR } \text{Repl. by AUBERT, } 05C$

### |λ| (B⁰ → J/ψK*(892)⁰)

**VALUE** **CL%**

$<0.25$ 95

**DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$1 \text{ AUBERT, } 04H \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

¹Uses the measured cosine coefficients C and C̄ and assumes |q/q| = 1.

### cos 2β (B⁰ → J/ψK*(892)⁰)

β(φ₁) is one of the angles of CMK unitarity triangle, see the review on “CP” Violation in the Reviews section.

**VALUE**

#### 1.7 +0.7 -0.9 OUR AVERAGE

**DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

Error includes scale factor of 1.6.

$2.72 \pm 0.50$

$-0.79 \pm 0.27$

$1 \text{ AUBERT } 05P \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$0.87 \pm 0.74 \pm 0.12$

$2 \text{ ITOH } 05 \text{ BELL } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

¹The measurement is obtained when sin 2β is fixed to 0.726 and the sign of cos 2β is positive with 86% confidence level.

²The measurement is obtained with sin 2β fixed to 0.731.

### cos 2β (B⁰ → [K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> π⁺π⁻]D<sub>(o)</sub> h<sup>0</sup>)

**VALUE**

$0.91 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.11$

**DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$1 \text{ ADACHI } 18 \text{ e}^+ \text{e}^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$1.06 \pm 0.33 \pm 0.21$

$-0.15 \pm 0.16$

$2 \text{ VOROBYEV } 16 \text{ BELL } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$0.42 \pm 0.49 \pm 0.16$

$3 \text{ AUBERT } 07BH \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$1.87 \pm 0.40 \pm 0.22$

$-0.53 \pm 0.32$

$4 \text{ KROKOVNY } 06 \text{ BELL } \text{Repl. by VOROBYEV } 16$

¹Analyzes joint data sample of Belle and BaBar using Dalitz plot analysis of D → K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>; the second error combines experimental systematic uncertainty and the Dalitz plot model uncertainty.

²A model-independent measurement uses the binned Dalitz plot technique.

³AUBERT 07BH evaluates the likelihoods for the positive and negative solutions assuming sin(2β<sub>eff</sub>) = 0.678. It quotes L<sub>+</sub> / (L<sub>+</sub> + L<sub>-</sub>) = 0.86 corresponding to a likelihood ratio of L<sub>+</sub> / L<sub>-</sub> = 6.14 in favor of the positive solution.

⁴KROKOVNY 06 evaluates the likelihoods for the positive and negative solutions assuming sin(2β<sub>eff</sub>) = 0.689. It quotes L<sub>+</sub> / (L<sub>+</sub> + L<sub>-</sub>) = 0.983 corresponding to a likelihood ratio of L<sub>+</sub> / L<sub>-</sub> = 57.8 in favor of the positive solution.

### (S<sub>+</sub> + S<sub>-</sub>)/2 (B⁰ → D*-π⁺)

S<sub>±</sub> = - (2/m(λ<sub>±</sub>) / (1 + |λ<sub>±</sub>|²)) where λ<sub>±</sub> and λ<sub>-</sub> are defined in the C<sub>ππ</sub> datablock above for

$B^0 \rightarrow D^{*-\pi^+} \text{ and } \bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+\pi^-}.$

**VALUE**

#### -0.039 ± 0.011 OUR AVERAGE

$-0.046 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.015$

**DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$1 \text{ BAHINIPATI } 11 \text{ BELL } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$2 \text{ AUBERT } 06 \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$1 \text{ AUBERT } 05Z \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$-0.039 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.013$

$-0.030 \pm 0.028 \pm 0.018$

$-0.068 \pm 0.038 \pm 0.020$

$-0.063 \pm 0.024 \pm 0.014$

$0.060 \pm 0.040 \pm 0.019$

$3 \text{ RONGA } 06 \text{ BELL } \text{Repl. by BAHINIPATI } 11$

$1 \text{ GERSHON } 05 \text{ BELL } \text{Repl. by RONGA } 06$

$2 \text{ AUBERT } 04V \text{ BABR } \text{Repl. by AUBERT } 06Y$

$1 \text{ AUBERT } 04W \text{ BABR } \text{Repl. by AUBERT } 05Z$

$2 \text{ SARANGI } 04 \text{ BELL } \text{Repl. by RONGA } 06$

¹Uses partially reconstructed B⁰ → D*-π∓ decays.

²Uses fully reconstructed B⁰ → D*-π∓ decays.

³Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed D*-π events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.

### (S<sub>-</sub> + S<sub>+</sub>)/2 (B⁰ → D*-π⁺)

**VALUE** **DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

#### -0.009 ± 0.015 OUR AVERAGE

$-0.015 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.015$

$0.049 \pm 0.042 \pm 0.015$

$-0.019 \pm 0.022 \pm 0.013$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$-0.011 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.013$

$-0.005 \pm 0.028 \pm 0.018$

$0.031 \pm 0.070 \pm 0.033$

$-0.004 \pm 0.037 \pm 0.014$

$0.049 \pm 0.040 \pm 0.019$

$3 \text{ RONGA } 06 \text{ BELL } \text{Repl. by BAHINIPATI } 11$

$1 \text{ GERSHON } 05 \text{ BELL } \text{Repl. by RONGA } 06$

$2 \text{ AUBERT } 04V \text{ BABR } \text{Repl. by AUBERT } 06Y$

$1 \text{ AUBERT } 04W \text{ BABR } \text{Repl. by AUBERT } 05Z$

$2 \text{ SARANGI } 04 \text{ BELL } \text{Repl. by RONGA } 06$

¹Uses partially reconstructed B⁰ → D*-π∓ decays.

²Uses fully reconstructed B⁰ → D*-π∓ decays.

³Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed D*-π events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.

### (S<sub>+</sub> + S<sub>-</sub>)/2 (B⁰ → D<sup>-</sup>π⁺)

**VALUE** **DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

#### -0.046 ± 0.023 OUR AVERAGE

$-0.010 \pm 0.023 \pm 0.07$

$-0.050 \pm 0.021 \pm 0.012$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$-0.022 \pm 0.038 \pm 0.020$

$-0.062 \pm 0.037 \pm 0.018$

¹Uses fully reconstructed B⁰ → D*-π∓ decays.

²Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed Dπ events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.

### (S<sub>-</sub> + S<sub>+</sub>)/2 (B⁰ → D<sup>-</sup>π⁺)

**VALUE** **DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

#### -0.022 ± 0.021 OUR AVERAGE

$-0.033 \pm 0.042 \pm 0.012$

$-0.019 \pm 0.021 \pm 0.012$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$0.025 \pm 0.068 \pm 0.033$

$-0.025 \pm 0.037 \pm 0.018$

¹Uses fully reconstructed B⁰ → D*-π∓ decays.

²Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed Dπ events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.

### S<sub>+</sub> (B⁰ → D<sup>-</sup>π⁺)

**VALUE** **DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$0.058 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.011$

¹Measured in the simultaneous analysis of B⁰ → D∓π∓ decays. AAIJ 18Z reports a statistical (systematic) correlation of 0.6 (−0.41) with the measured value of S<sub>-</sub> (B⁰ → D<sup>-</sup>π⁺).

### (S<sub>+</sub> + S<sub>-</sub>)/2 (B⁰ → D<sup>-</sup>π⁺)

**VALUE** **DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$-0.024 \pm 0.031 \pm 0.009$

¹Uses fully reconstructed B⁰ → D<sup>-</sup>π⁺ decays.

### (S<sub>-</sub> + S<sub>+</sub>)/2 (B⁰ → D<sup>-</sup>π⁺)

**VALUE** **DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$-0.098 \pm 0.055 \pm 0.018$

¹Uses fully reconstructed B⁰ → D<sup>-</sup>π⁺ decays.

### C<sub>ηc</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup> (B⁰ → η<sub>c</sub> K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup>)

**VALUE** **DOCUMENT ID** **TECN** **COMMENT**

$0.080 \pm 0.124 \pm 0.029$

$AUBERT 09K \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$
$$S_{\eta_c K_S^0} (B^0 \rightarrow \eta_c K_S^0)$$

VALUE

0.925 ± 0.160 ± 0.057

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

AUBERT

09K BABR

$e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

$$C_{c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0} (B^0 \rightarrow c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0)$$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

0.5 ± 1.5 OUR EVALUATION

0.4 ± 1.0 OUR AVERAGE

0.4 ± 1.2

0.6 ± 1.6 ± 1.2

-29 ± 53/ -44 ± 6

2.4 ± 2.0 ± 1.6

1 AAIJ

24 LHCB pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV

2 ADACHI

12A BELL $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

3 AUBERT

09AU BABR $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

4 AUBERT

09K BABR $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.8 ± 1.2 ± 0.3

- 1.7 ± 2.9

4 ± 7 ± 5

4.9 ± 2.3 ± 1.8

- 1.8 ± 2.1 ± 1.4

- 0.7 ± 4.1 ± 3.3

5.1 ± 3.2 ± 1.4

5.1 ± 5.1 ± 2.6

5.3 ± 5.4 ± 3.2

5,6 AAIJ

24 LHCB pp at 13 TeV

5,7 AAIJ

17BN LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

8 SAHOO

08 BELL Repl. by ADACHI 12A

4 AUBERT

07AY BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09K

9 CHEN

07 BELL Repl. by ADACHI 12A

10 ABE

05B BELL Repl. by CHEN 07

11 AUBERT

05F BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07AY

12 ABE

02Z BELL Repl. by ABE 05B

13 AUBERT

02P BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05F

1 A combination of this Run 2 result with the Run 1 result from AAIJ 17BN is reported with a correlation coefficient of 0.40.

2 Measurement based on $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K_S^0$, $B^0 \rightarrow \psi(2S) K_S^0$, $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K_L^0$, and $B^0 \rightarrow \chi_{c1}(1P) K_S^0$ decays.

3 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \rightarrow K_\pi^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.

4 Measurement based on $B^0 \rightarrow c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0$ decays.

5 Measurement based on $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K_S^0$, $B^0 \rightarrow \psi(2S) K_S^0$ with $J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^-$, $J/\psi \rightarrow e^+ e^-$ and $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^-$.

6 AAIJ 24 provides the correlation coefficient $\rho=0.441$ between the uncertainties of $\sin(2\beta)$ and $C_{c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0}$ ($B^0 \rightarrow c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0$) measurements.

7 AAIJ 17BN provides the correlation coefficient $\rho=0.42$ between the uncertainties of $S_{B^0 \rightarrow c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0}(B^0 \rightarrow c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0)$ and $C_{c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0}(B^0 \rightarrow c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0)$ measurements.

8 Reports value of $A$ of $B^0 \rightarrow \psi(2S) K^0$ which is equal to $-C$.

9 Reports value of $A$ of $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K^0$ which is equal to $-C$.

10 Measurement based on $152 \times 10^6 B\bar{B}$ pairs.

11 Measurement based on $227 \times 10^6 B\bar{B}$ pairs.

12 Measured with both $\eta_f = \pm 1$ samples.

13 Measured with the high purity of $\eta_f = -1$ samples.

## sin(2β)

For a discussion of CP violation, see the review on “CP Violation” in the Reviews section. $\sin(2\beta)$ is a measure of the CP-violating amplitude in the $B^0_d \rightarrow J/\psi(1S) K_S^0$.

VALUE

0.709 ± 0.011 OUR EVALUATION

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

(Produced by HFLAV)

0.708 ± 0.017 OUR AVERAGE

1 AAIJ

24 LHCB pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV

0.667 ± 0.023 ± 0.012

0.57 ± 0.58 ± 0.06

0.69 ± 0.52 ± 0.08

0.687 ± 0.028 ± 0.012

1.56 ± 0.42 ± 0.21

0.79 ± 0.41/ -0.44

0.84 ± 0.82/ -1.04 ± 0.16

3.2 ± 1.8/ -2.0 ± 0.5

2 ADACHI

12A BELL $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

3 SATO

12 BELL $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(5S)$

4 AUBERT

09AU BABR $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

5 AUBERT

09K BABR $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

6 AUBERT

04R BABR $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

7 AFFOLDER

00C CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.8 TeV

8 BARATE

00Q ALEP $e^+ e^- \rightarrow Z$

9 ACKERSTAFF

98Z OPAL $e^+ e^- \rightarrow Z$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.717 ± 0.013 ± 0.008

0.760 ± 0.034

0.72 ± 0.09 ± 0.03

0.714 ± 0.032 ± 0.018

0.642 ± 0.031 ± 0.017

0.728 ± 0.056 ± 0.023

0.722 ± 0.040 ± 0.023

0.99 ± 0.14 ± 0.06

0.719 ± 0.074 ± 0.035

0.59 ± 0.14 ± 0.05

0.741 ± 0.067 ± 0.034

0.58 ± 0.32 ± 0.09

-0.34 -0.10

0.99 ± 0.14 ± 0.06

0.34 ± 0.20 ± 0.05

0.59 ± 0.14 ± 0.05

1.8 ± 1.1 ± 0.3

10,11 AAIJ

24 LHCB pp at 13 TeV

10,12 AAIJ

17BN LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

13 SAHOO

08 BELL Repl. by ADACHI 12A

5 AUBERT

07AY BABR Repl. by ADACHI 09K

CHEN

07 BELL Repl. by ADACHI 12A

14 ABE

05B BELL Repl. by CHEN 07

15 AUBERT

05F BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07AY

16 ABE

02U BELL $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

17 ABE

02Z BELL Repl. by ABE 05B

18 AUBERT

02N BABR $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

19 AUBERT

02P BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05F

ABASHIAN

01 BELL Repl. by ABE 01G

20 ABE

01G BABR Repl. by ABE 02Z

AUBERT

01 BABR Repl. by AUBERT 01B

20 AUBERT

01B BABR Repl. by AUBERT 02P

21 ABE

98U CDF Repl. by AFFOLDER 00C

1 A combination of this Run 2 result with the Run 1 result from AAIJ 17BN is reported with a correlation coefficient of 0.40.

2 Measurement based on $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K_S^0$, $B^0 \rightarrow \psi(2S) K_S^0$, $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K_L^0$, and $B^0 \rightarrow \chi_{c1}(1P) K_S^0$ decays.

3 SATO 12 uses $121 \text{ fb}^{-1}$ data collected on $Y(5S)$ resonance. Uses the "B-π tagging" where $B\pi^+$ and $B\pi^-$ tagged $J/\psi K_S^0$ events are compared.

4 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \rightarrow K_\pi^0 \pi^-$ decays and the first of two equivalent solutions.

5 Measurement based on $B^0 \rightarrow c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0$ decays.

6 Measurement in which the $J/\psi$ decays to hadrons or to muons that do not satisfy the standard identification criteria.

7 AFFOLDER 00C uses about 400 $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi(1S) K_S^0$ events. The production flavor of $B^0$ was determined using three tagging algorithms: a same-side tag, a jet-charge tag, and a soft-lepton tag.

8 BARATE 00Q uses 23 candidates for $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi(1S) K_S^0$ decays. A combination of jet-charge, vertex-charge, and same-side tagging techniques were used to determine the $B^0$ production flavor.

9 ACKERSTAFF 98z uses 24 candidates for $B^0_d \rightarrow J/\psi(1S) K_S^0$ decay. A combination of jet-charge and vertex-charge techniques were used to tag the $B^0_d$ production flavor.

10 Measurement based on $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K_S^0$, $B^0 \rightarrow \psi(2S) K_S^0$ with $J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^-$, $J/\psi \rightarrow e^+ e^-$ and $\psi(2S) \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^-$.

11 AAIJ 24 provides the correlation coefficient $\rho = 0.441$ between the uncertainties of $\sin(2\beta)$ and $C_{c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0}$ ($B^0 \rightarrow c\bar{c}\kappa(*)0$) measurements.

12 AAIJ 17BN provides the correlation coefficient $\rho = 0.42$ between the uncertainties of $\sin(2\beta)$ and $\cos(2\beta)$ measurements.

13 Based on $B^0 \rightarrow \psi(2S) K_S^0$ decays.

14 Measurement based on $152 \times 10^6 B\bar{B}$ pairs.

15 Measurement based on $227 \times 10^6 B\bar{B}$ pairs.

16 ABE 02U result is based on the same analysis and data sample reported in ABE 01G.

17 ABE 02Z result is based on $85 \times 10^6 B\bar{B}$ pairs.

18 AUBERT 02N result based on the same analysis and data sample reported in AUBERT 01B.

19 AUBERT 02P result is based on $88 \times 10^6 B\bar{B}$ pairs.

20 First observation of CP violation in $B^0$ meson system.

21 ABE 98U uses $198 \pm 17 B^0_d \rightarrow J/\psi(1S) K_S^0$ events. The production flavor of $B^0$ was determined using the same side tagging technique.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.708±0.017 (Error scaled by 1.5)

<figure><img src="image_616.png" /></figure>

(Confidence Level = 0.118)

$\sin(2\beta)$

$$C_{J/\psi(nS)} K_S^0 (B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi(nS) K_S^0)$$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

0.8 ± 1.7 OUR EVALUATION

0.3 ± 1.0 OUR AVERAGE

0.4 ± 1.2

1.5 ± 2.1 ± 4.3/ -4.5

-10.4 ± 5.5 ± 2.7/ -4.7

- 1.9 ± 2.6 ± 4.1/ -1.7

8.9 ± 7.6 ± 2.0

1.6 ± 2.3 ± 1.8

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

(Produced by HFLAV)

1 AAIJ

24 LHCB pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV

2,3 ADACHI

12A BELL $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

3,4 ADACHI

12A BELL $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

3,5 ADACHI

12A BELL $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

4 AUBERT

09K BABR $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

AUBERT

09K BABR $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \Upsilon(4S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.8 ± 1.2 ± 0.3

- 8.7 ± 4.8 ± 0.5

1.5 ± 1.3 ± 0.3

- 1.7 ± 2.9

- 1.4 ± 3.0

5 ± 10 ± 1

- 3.8 ± 3.2 ± 0.5

3 ± 9 ± 1

4 ± 7 ± 5

- 1.8 ± 2.1 ± 1.4

6,7 AAIJ

24 LHCB pp at 13 TeV

8 AAIJ

24 LHCB pp at 13 TeV

9 AAIJ

24 LHCB pp at 13 TeV

6,10 AAIJ

17BN LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

9 AAIJ

17BN LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

11 AAIJ

15N LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 17BN

12 AAIJ

13K LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15N

3,4 SAHOO

08 BELL Repl. by ADACHI 12A

3 CHEN

07 BELL Repl. by ADACHI 12A

1 A combination of this Run 2 result with the Run 1 result from AAIJ 17BN is reported with a correlation coefficient of 0.40.

2 Uses $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K_S^0$ decays.

3 The paper reports A, which is equal to $-C$.