$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\pi^+) / \Gamma(\psi(2S)K^+) $$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

### 3.97±0.29 OUR AVERAGE

3.95±0.40±0.12

3.99±0.36±0.17

$$ \Gamma_{329} / \Gamma_{330} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>BHARDWAJ</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS

$$ \Gamma_{330} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 6.24±0.21 OUR FIT

### 6.40± 0.34 OUR AVERAGE

4.6 ± 1.0 ±0.7

6.4 ± 1.0 ±0.4

6.65 ± 0.17±0.55

6.17 ± 0.32±0.44

7.8 ± 0.7 ±0.9

18 ± 8 ±4

1 LEES 20c BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

1 KATO 18 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

2 GULER 11 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

2 AUBERT 05j BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

2 RICHICHI 01 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

2 ALBRECHT 90j ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

4.9 ± 1.6 ±0.4

6.9 ± 0.6

6.4 ± 0.5 ±0.8

6.1 ± 2.3 ±0.9

<5 at 90% CL

22 ±17

1 AUBERT 06E BABR Repl. by LEES 20c

2 ABE 03B BELL Repl. by GULER 11

2 AUBERT 02 BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05j

2 ALAM 94 CLE2 Repl. by RICHICHI 01

2 BORTOLETTO 92 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

3 ALBRECHT 87D ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

¹Measures absolute branching fractions using a missing-mass technique.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³ALBRECHT 87d assume $B^+B^- / B^0B^0$ ratio is 55/45. Superseded by ALBRECHT 90.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)K^+) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^+) $$

$$ \Gamma_{330} / \Gamma_{295} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13s LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2,3 AAIJ</td><td>12l LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>09Y D0</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>98o CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ 1.8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

VALUE

### 0.612±0.019 OUR FIT

### 0.605±0.023 OUR AVERAGE

0.58 ±0.11 ±0.02

0.608±0.018±0.017

0.63 ±0.05 ±0.08

0.558±0.082±0.056

1 AAIJ 13s reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \psi(2S)K^+) / \Gamma(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+)] \times [B(\psi(2S) \to p\bar{p})] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})]$

2,3 AAIJ 12l LHCB pp at 7 TeV

ABAZOV 09Y D0

ABE 98o CDF p̄p̄ 1.8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.64 ±0.06 ±0.07

4 AUBERT 02 BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

¹AAIJ 13s reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \psi(2S)K^+) / \Gamma(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+)] \times [B(\psi(2S) \to p\bar{p})] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})]$ and $0.080 \pm 0.012 \pm 0.009$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\psi(2S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.94 \pm 0.09) \times 10^{-4}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$, Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

²AAIJ 12l reports $0.594 \pm 0.006 \pm 0.016 \pm 0.015$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \psi(2S)K^+) / \Gamma(B^+ \to J/\psi(1S)K^+)] \times [B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-)] / [B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)]$ assuming $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.94 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = (7.72 \pm 0.17) \times 10^{-3}$, which we rescale to our best values $B(J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-) = (5.971 \pm 0.032) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = (7.94 \pm 0.22) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

³Assumes $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-) / B(\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = B(J/\psi \to e^+e^-) / B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-) = 7.69 \pm 0.19$.

⁴Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)K^*(892^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{331} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

### 6.7 ±1.4 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3.

5.92±0.85±0.89

9.2 ±1.9 ±1.2

1 AUBERT 05j BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

1 RICHICHI 01 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<30 90

<35 90

<49 90

1 ALAM 94 CLE2 Repl. by RICHICHI 01

1 BORTOLETTO 92 CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

1 ALBRECHT 90j ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)K^*(892^+) / \Gamma(\psi(2S)K^+) $$

$$ \Gamma_{331} / \Gamma_{330} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AUBERT</td><td>05j BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

VALUE

0.96±0.15±0.09

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)K^0\pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{332} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.588 ±0.034

1 AUBERT 09AA BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

¹Does not report systematic uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)K^+\pi^+\pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{333} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.3 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.31 ± 0.20±0.50</td><td>1 GULER</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>19 ±11 ±4</td><td>3 1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90j ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) EVTS

### 4.3 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE

4.31 ± 0.20±0.50

19 ±11 ±4

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S)\phi(1020)K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{334} / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1,2 KHACHATRY...17c</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

### 4.0±0.4±0.6

¹Measured using $B^+ \to \psi(2S)K^+$ as a normalization channel. The second error represents total systematic uncertainties including those from branching fractions which were taken from PDG 16 as $B(\phi \to K^+K^-) = 0.489 \pm 0.005$ and $B(B^+ \to \psi(2S)K^+) = (6.26 \pm 0.24) \times 10^{-4}$.

²An upper limit on the fraction of the non-$\phi$ component in $B^+ \to \psi(2S)K^+K^-K^+$ decays is set as 0.26 at the 95% confidence level.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(3770)K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{335} / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻³) CL%

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.43±0.11 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.32±0.20±0.05±0.01</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>20c BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.48±0.11±0.07</td><td>3 CHISTOV</td><td>04 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<0.23 90

3.5 ±2.5 ±0.3

2 KATO 18 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

2 AUBERT 06E BABR Repl. by LEES 20c

¹LEES 20c measurement's last uncertainty is due to the used $B(B^\pm \to K^\pm J/\psi)$ value.

²Measures absolute branching fractions using a missing-mass technique.

³Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(3770)K^+) / \Gamma(D^-D^+K^+) $$

$$ \Gamma_{335} / \Gamma_{221} $$

VALUE

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.352±0.035<sup>+0.034</sup><sub>-0.031</sub></td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>20AI LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20AI reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \psi(3770)K^+) / \Gamma(B^+ \to D^-D^+K^+)] \times [B(\psi(3770) \to D^+D^-)] = (14.5 \pm 1.2 \times 0.8) \times 10^{-2}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\psi(3770) \to D^+D^-) = (41 \pm 4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of $B^+ \to D^-D^+K^+$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(3770)K^+, \psi \to D^0\bar{D}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{336} / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.5 ±0.5 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.4.</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.18±0.41±0.15</td><td>1 LEES 15c BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.2 ±0.5 ±0.3</td><td>1 BRODZICKA 08 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.41±0.30±0.22

3.4 ±0.8 ±0.5

1 AUBERT 08B BABR Repl. by LEES 15c

1 CHISTOV 04 BELL Repl. by BRODZICKA 08

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(3770)K^+, \psi \to D^+D^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{337} / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.94±0.35 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.84±0.32±0.21</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08B BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.4 ±0.8 ±0.2</td><td>1 CHISTOV</td><td>04 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(3770)K^+, \psi \to p\bar{p}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{338} / \Gamma $$

VALUE

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2 × 10<sup>-7</sup> 95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17AD LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured relative to $B^+ \to J/\psi K^+$ decay with charmonium reconstructed in $p\bar{p}$ final state and using $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) \times B(J/\psi \to p\bar{p}) = (2.17 \pm 0.08) \times 10^{-6}$.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(3770)K^+, \psi \to J/\psi\eta) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{339} / \Gamma $$

VALUE

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.6 × 10<sup>-7</sup> 90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22D LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4040)K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{340} / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻³) CL%

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.6 ±0.5±0.2</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>22D LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<3.0 90

<0.13 90

2 IWASHITA 14 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

1 AAIJ 13BC LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹AAIJ 22D reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \psi(4040)K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\psi(4040) \to J/\psi\eta)] = (8.53 \pm 2.35 \pm 0.30) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\psi(4040) \to J/\psi\eta) = (5.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²IWASHITA 14 reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \psi(4040)K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\psi(4040) \to J/\psi\eta)] < 15.5 \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\psi(4040) \to J/\psi\eta) = 5.2 \times 10^{-3}$.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4040)K^+, \psi \to D^+D^-) / \Gamma(D^-D^+K^+) $$

$$ \Gamma_{341} / \Gamma_{221} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻²) CL%

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.0±1.3±0.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20AI LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of $B^+ \to D^-D^+K^+$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4160)K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} $$

$$ \Gamma_{342} / \Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴) CL%

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.1 ±1.3±2.4</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13BC LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>
¹AAIJ 13BC reports $[\Gamma(B^{+} \rightarrow \psi(4160) K^{+})]/\Gamma_{\text{total}}]$ × B($\psi(4160) \rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-}$) = $(3.5^{+0.9}_{-0.8}) \times 10^{-9}$ which we divide by our best value B($\psi(4160) \rightarrow e^{+}e^{-}$) = $(6.9 \pm 3.3) \times 10^{-6}$ assuming lepton universality. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4160) K^{+}, \psi \rightarrow D^{0} D^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{343}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴)

$$ 0.84 \pm 0.41 \pm 0.33 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 LEES</td><td>15c</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4160) K^{+}, \psi \rightarrow D^{+} D^{-})/\Gamma(D^{-} D^{+} K^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{344}/\Gamma_{221} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

$$ 6.6 \pm 1.5 \pm 1.2 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20AI</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of B$^{+} \rightarrow D^{-}D^{+}K^{+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4145) K^{+}, \psi \rightarrow D^{+} D^{-})/\Gamma(D^{-} D^{+} K^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{345}/\Gamma_{221} $$

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

$$ 9.2 \pm 1.4 \pm 1.5 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20AI</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of B$^{+} \rightarrow D^{-}D^{+}K^{+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(4145) K^{+}, \psi \rightarrow J/\psi\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{346}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

$$ <9.6 \times 10^{-7} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CL%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22d LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0} \pi^{+}, \chi_{c0} \rightarrow \pi^{+} \pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{347}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

$$ <0.1 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>05G BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09L</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0} \pi^{+}, \chi_{c0} \rightarrow \pi^{0} \pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{348}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

$$ <5 \times 10^{-7} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>90</td><td>LAI</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0} K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{349}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CL%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22d LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1.51 $^{+0.15}_{-0.13}$ OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.0 ± 1.3 ± 0.3 ± 0.1</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.8 $^{+0.6}_{-0.5}$ ± 0.6</td><td>3 CHILIKIN</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.84 ± 0.25 ± 0.14</td><td>4,5 LEES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.68 ± 0.32 ± 0.16</td><td>4,6 LEES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.8 ± 0.8 ± 0.1</td><td>7 LEES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.23 $^{+0.27}_{-0.25}$ ± 0.06</td><td>4,8 AUBERT</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>4.3 ± 2.0 ± 0.3</td><td>9 AUBERT, BE</td><td>06M BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.12 ± 0.12 $^{+0.30}_{-0.20}$</td><td>4 GARMASH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.3</td><td>90</td><td>2 KATO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.7</td><td>95</td><td>10 AAIJ 13S LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5</td><td>90</td><td>4,11 WICHT 08 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.8</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT 06E BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.84 ± 0.32 ± 0.31</td><td>4,12 AUBERT 06O BABR Repl. by LEES 120</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;8.9</td><td>90</td><td>4 AUBERT 05K BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.39 ± 0.49 ± 0.11</td><td>13 AUBERT, B 05N BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.96 ± 0.35 $^{+2.00}_{-0.42}$</td><td>4 GARMASH 05 BELL Repl. by GARMASH 06</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.7 ± 0.7</td><td>14 AUBERT 04T BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 04P</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.0 ± 0.8 ± 0.3</td><td>15 AUBERT, B 04P BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 05N</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6.0 $^{+2.1}_{-1.8}$ ± 1.1</td><td>16 ABE 02B BELL Repl. by GARMASH 05</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.8</td><td>90</td><td>17 EDWARDS 01 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹LEES 20c measurement's last uncertainty is due to the used B($B^{\pm} \rightarrow K^{\pm} J/\psi$) value.

²Measures absolute branching fractions using a missing-mass technique.

³CHILIKIN 19 reports $[\Gamma(B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c0} K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \rightarrow p\bar{p}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})] = (3.7^{+1.2}_{-0.3}) \times 10^{-7}$ which we divide by our best value B($\chi_{c0}(1P) \rightarrow p\bar{p}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$) = $(2.1 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

⁵Measured in the B$^{+} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-}K^{+}$ decay.

⁶Measured in the B$^{+} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}$ decay.

⁷LEES 11I reports $[\Gamma(B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c0} K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \rightarrow \pi\pi)] = (1.53 \pm 0.66 \pm 0.27) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value B($\chi_{c0}(1P) \rightarrow \pi\pi$) = $(8.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁸AUBERT 08AI reports $(0.70 \pm 0.10^{+0.12}_{-0.10}) \times 10^{-6}$ for B($B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c0} K^{+}$) × B($\chi_{c0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}$). We compute B($B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c0} K^{+}$) using the PDG value B($\chi_{c0} \rightarrow \pi\pi$) = $(8.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$ and 2/3 for the $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

⁹AUBERT, BE 06M reports $[\Gamma(B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c0} K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(15))] = (6.1 \pm 2.6 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value B($\chi_{c0}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(15)$) = $(1.41 \pm 0.09) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. The significance of the observed signal is 2.4 σ.

¹⁰AAIJ 13S reports $[\Gamma(B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c0} K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \rightarrow p\bar{p})] < 6 \times 10^{-8}$ which we divide by our best value B($\chi_{c0}(1P) \rightarrow p\bar{p}$) = $2.21 \times 10^{-4}$.

¹¹WICHT 08 reports $[\Gamma(B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c0} K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma\gamma)] < 0.11 \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value B($\chi_{c0}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$) = $2.04 \times 10^{-4}$.

¹²Measured in the B$^{+} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-}K^{+}$ decay.

¹³AUBERT, B 05N reports $(0.66 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.08) \times 10^{-6}$ for B($B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c0}^{0} K^{+}$) × B($\chi_{c0}^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}$). We compute B($B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c0}^{0} K^{+}$) using the PDG value B($\chi_{c0}^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}$) = $(7.1 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-3}$ and 2/3 for the $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ fraction.

¹⁴The measurement performed using decay channels $\chi_{c0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ and $\chi_{c0} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-}$. The ratio of the branching ratios for these channels is found to be consistent with world average.

¹⁵AUBERT 04P reports B($B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c0} K^{+}) \times B(\chi_{c0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}) = (1.5 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.1) \times 10^{-6}$ and used PDG value of B($\chi_{c0} \rightarrow \pi\pi$) = $(7.4 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-3}$ and Clebsh-Gordan coefficient to compute B($B^{\pm} \rightarrow \chi_{c0} K^{+}$).

¹⁶ABE 02B measures the ratio of B($B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c0} K^{+})/B(B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi(15) K^{+}) = 0.60 + 0.21 - 0.18 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.08$, where the third error is due to the uncertainty in the B($\chi_{c0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}$), and uses B($B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi(15) K^{+}$) = $(10.0 \pm 1.0) \times 10^{-4}$ to obtain the result.

¹⁷EDWARDS 01 assumes equal production of B$^{0}$ and B$^{+}$ at the T(45). The correlated uncertainties (28.3)% from B(J/ψ(1S) → $\gamma\eta_{c}$) in those modes have been accounted for.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0} K^{0} \pi^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{350}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

$$ 1.45 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.19 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B$^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{+}$ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0} K^{+}(892)^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{351}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴)

$$ <2.1 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BD BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <28.6 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05K BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08BD</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P) \pi^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{352}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁵)

$$ 2.2 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.3 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 KUMAR</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P) K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{353}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴)

4.74 $^{\pm 0.22}$ OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.0 ± 0.8 ± 0.6 ± 0.1</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>9 $^{+3}_{-2}$ ± 4</td><td>3 CHILIKIN</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>5.8 ± 0.9 ± 0.5</td><td>1 KATO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>4.94 ± 0.11 ± 0.33</td><td>4 BHARDWAJ</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>4.5 ± 0.1 ± 0.3</td><td>5 AUBERT</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>15.5 ± 5.4 ± 2.0</td><td>6 ACOSTA p\bar{p} 1.8 TeV</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.1 ± 1.4 ± 0.7</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>5.1 ± 0.4 ± 0.2</td><td>7 AUBERT, BE</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>4.49 ± 0.19 ± 0.53</td><td>5 SONI</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>5.79 ± 0.26 ± 0.65</td><td>4 AUBERT</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>6.0 ± 0.9 ± 0.2</td><td>8 AUBERT</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>9.7 ± 4.0 ± 0.9</td><td>4 ALAM</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>19 ± 13 ± 6</td><td>9 ALBRECHT</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measures absolute branching fractions using a missing-mass technique.

²LEES 20c measurement's last uncertainty is due to the used B($B^{\pm} \rightarrow K^{\pm} J/\psi$) value.

³CHILIKIN 19 reports $[\Gamma(B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c1}(1P) K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow p\bar{p}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})] = (4.7^{+1.3}_{-0.2}) \times 10^{-7}$ which we divide by our best value B($\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow p\bar{p}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$) = $(5.0 \pm 1.9) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

⁵Uses $\chi_{c1,2} \rightarrow J/\psi\gamma$. Assumes B(T(45) → B$^{+}$B$^{-}$) = $(51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and B(T(45) → B$^{0}$B$^{0}$) = $(48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

⁶ACOSTA 02F uses as reference of B($B \rightarrow J/\psi(15) K^{+}$) = $(10.1 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-4}$. The second error includes the systematic error and the uncertainties of the branching ratio.

⁷AUBERT, BE 06M reports $[\Gamma(B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c1}(1P) K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(15))] = (1.76 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.12) \times 10^{-4}$ which we divide by our best value B($\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(15)$) = $(34.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁸AUBERT 02 reports $(7.5 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \rightarrow \chi_{c1}(1P) K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(15))]$ assuming B($\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(15)$) = $0.273 \pm 0.016$, which we rescale to our best value B($\chi_{c1}(1P) \rightarrow \gamma J/\psi(15)$) = $(34.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of B$^{+}$ and B$^{0}$ at the T(45).

⁹ALBRECHT 92E assumes no $\chi_{c2}(1P)$ production and $B(T(45) \rightarrow B^{+}B^{-}) = 50\%$.
$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)K^{+})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{353}/\Gamma_{295} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.60±0.07±0.02</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>02</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT 02 reports 0.75±0.08±0.05 from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to \chi_{c1}(1P)K^{+})/\Gamma(B^{+} \to J/\psi(1S)K^{+})] \times [\Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S))]$ assuming $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (0.273 \pm 0.016)$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (34.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)\pi^{+})/\Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)K^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{352}/\Gamma_{353} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.043±0.008±0.003</td><td>1 KUMAR</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)K^{*}(892^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}) \quad \Gamma_{354}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.0 ± 0.6</td><td>OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr></tbody></table>

2.6 ± 0.5 ± 0.4 ¹AUBERT 09B BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

4.05±0.59±0.95 ²SONI 06 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.94±0.95±0.98</td><td>2AUBERT</td><td>05J</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09B</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;21</td><td>2ALAM</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses $\chi_{c1,2} \to J/\psi\gamma$. Assumes $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^{+}B^{-}) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^{0}\bar{B}^{0}) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

²Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)K^{*}(892^{+})/\Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)K^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{354}/\Gamma_{353} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.51±0.17±0.16</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>05J</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)K^{0}\pi^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{355}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.75±0.26±0.32</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)K^{0}\pi^{+})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)K^{0}\pi^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{355}/\Gamma_{296} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.503±0.030±0.019</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>12B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹LEES 12B reports 0.501 ± 0.024 ± 0.028 from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^{+} \to \chi_{c1}(1P)K^{0}\pi^{+})/\Gamma(B^{+} \to J/\psi(1S)K^{0}\pi^{+})] \times [\Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S))]$ assuming $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (34.4 \pm 1.5) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (34.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)K^{+}\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{356}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.29±0.29±0.19</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P)K^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{357}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.74±0.18±0.24</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(2P)K^{+}, \chi_{c1}(2P) \to \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\chi_{c1}(1P))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{358}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹BHARDWAJ 16 analysis fixes mass and width of the $\chi_{c1}(2P)$ state to 3920 MeV and 20 MeV.

²Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}\pi^{+}, \chi_{c2} \to \pi^{0}\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{359}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>LAI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{360}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.11<sup>+0.36</sup><sub>-0.34</sub>±0.09</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>11</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1.8 90 2AUBERT 09B BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

<20 90 3AUBERT 06E BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

<2.9 90 1SONI 06 BELL Repl. by BHARDWAJ 11

<3.0 90 1AUBERT 05K BABR Repl. by AUBERT 06E

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Uses $\chi_{c1,2} \to J/\psi\gamma$. Assumes $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^{+}B^{-}) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^{0}\bar{B}^{0}) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

³Perform measurements of absolute branching fractions using a missing mass technique.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}K^{+}, \chi_{c2} \to p\bar{p}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{361}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.9 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>CHILIKIN</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(B^{+} \to \chi_{c2}K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times \Gamma(\chi_{c2}(1P) \to \gamma\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{360}/\Gamma \times \Gamma_{96}^{\chi_{c2}(1P)}/\Gamma_{\chi_{c2}(1P)} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.09</td><td>90</td><td>1 WICHT</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}K^{*}(892^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}) \quad \Gamma_{362}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;12 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09B BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<12.7 × 10<sup>-5</sup> 90 2SONI 06 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

<1.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup> 90 2AUBERT 05k BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09B

¹Uses $\chi_{c1,2} \to J/\psi\gamma$. Assumes $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^{+}B^{-}) = (51.6 \pm 0.6)\%$ and $B(\Upsilon(4S) \to B^{0}\bar{B}^{0}) = (48.4 \pm 0.6)\%$.

²Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}K^{0}\pi^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{363}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.24±0.25 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

9.2 ± 2.1 ± 1.3 ¹AAIJ 23AH LHCB pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV

1.16±0.22±0.12 ²BHARDWAJ 16 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

¹The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of $B^{+} \to J/\psi K^{+}$ uncertainties.

²Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}K^{+}\pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{364}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.62 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}K^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{365}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.34±0.17±0.09</td><td>1 BHARDWAJ</td><td>16 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}(3930)K^{+}, \chi_{c2} \to D^{+}D^{-})/\Gamma(D^{-}D^{+}K^{+}) \quad \Gamma_{366}/\Gamma_{221} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.2±1.2±0.3</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20AI LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured in Dalitz plot analysis of $B^{+} \to D^{-}D^{+}K^{+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}(3930)\pi^{+}, \chi_{c2} \to \pi^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{367}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09L BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(h_{c}(1P)K^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{368}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.7<sup>+1.0+0.8</sup><sub>-0.9-0.8</sub></td><td>CHILIKIN</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<3.8 90 1FANG 06 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and $B(h_{c} \to \eta_{c}\gamma) = 50\%$.

$$ \Gamma(h_{c}(1P)K^{+}, h_{c} \to p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{369}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.4 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13s LHCB pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured relative to $B^{+} \to J/\psi K^{+}$ decay with charmonium reconstructed in $p\bar{p}$ final state and using $B(\bar{p} \to J/\psi K^{+}) = (1.013 \pm 0.034) \times 10^{-3}$ and $B(J/\psi \to p\bar{p}) = (2.17 \pm 0.07) \times 10^{-3}$.

$$ \Gamma(\chi^{0}\pi^{+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{370}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>23.9 ± 0.6 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

24.0 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE

24.37 ± 0.71 ± 0.86 ADACHI 24 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

23.97 ± 0.53 ± 0.71 ¹DUH 13 BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

23.9 ± 1.1 ± 1.0 ¹AUBERT, BE 06C BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

18.8 ± 3.7 ± 2.1 ³.3 ± 1.8 ¹BORNHEIM 03 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

22.8 ± 0.8 ± 0.7 1 LIN 07 BELL Repl. by DUH 13

26.0 ± 1.3 ± 1.0 ¹AUBERT, BE 05E BABR Repl. by AUBERT, BE 06C

23.3 ± 1.7 ± 1.1 ¹AUBERT 04M BABR Repl. by AUBERT, BE 05E

22.0 ± 1.9 ± 1.1 ¹CHAO 04 BELL Repl. by LIN 07

19.4 ± 3.1 ± 3.0 1 CASEY 02 BELL Repl. by CHAO 04
<table><tr><td>13.7</td><td>+ 5.7</td><td>+1.9</td><td>1.8</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>01H BELL</td><td>Repl. by CASEY 02</td></tr><tr><td>18.2</td><td>+ 3.3</td><td>+2.0</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01E BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 04M</td></tr><tr><td>18.2</td><td>+ 4.6</td><td>+1.6</td><td></td><td>1 CRONIN-HEN..00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by BORNHEIM 03</td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td>+11</td><td>+3.6</td><td></td><td>GODANG</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by CRONIN-HENNESSY 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 48</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by GODANG 98</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;190</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;100</td><td>90</td><td>2 AVERY</td><td>89B CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;680</td><td>90</td><td>AVERY</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

2 AVERY 89B reports < 9 × 10⁻⁵ assuming the T(4S) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K^+\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{371}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>13.2 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>13.93 ±0.38 ±0.71</td><td></td><td>ADACHI</td><td>24 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>12.62 ±0.31 ±0.56</td><td></td><td>1 DUH</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>13.6 ±0.6 ±0.7</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07BC BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>12.9 ±2.4 ±1.2</td><td>-2.2</td><td>1 BORNHEIM</td><td>03 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>12.4 ±0.5 ±0.6</td><td>1 LIN</td><td>07A BELL</td><td>Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr><tr><td>12.0 ±0.7 ±0.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05L BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07BC</td></tr><tr><td>12.0 ±1.3 ±1.3</td><td>1 CHAO</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIN 07A</td></tr><tr><td>12.8 ±1.2 ±1.1</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03L BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05L</td></tr><tr><td>13.0 ±2.5 ±2.4</td><td>1 CASEY</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHAO 04</td></tr><tr><td>16.3 ±3.5 ±3.3</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>01H BELL</td><td>Repl. by CASEY 02</td></tr><tr><td>10.8 ±2.1 ±1.9</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01E BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 03L</td></tr><tr><td>11.6 ±3.0 ±2.7</td><td>1 CRONIN-HEN..00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by BORNHEIM 03</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;16</td><td>90</td><td>GODANG</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by CRONIN-HENNESSY 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;14</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by GODANG 98</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^+\pi^0)/\Gamma(K^0\pi^+) \qquad \Gamma_{371}/\Gamma_{370} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.54 ±0.03 ±0.04</td><td>LIN</td><td>07A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>2.38<sup>+0.98</sup><sub>-1.0</sub> ±0.39</td><td>ABE</td><td>01H BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIN 07A</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\eta' K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{372}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>70.4 ± 2.5 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>71.5 ± 1.3 ± 3.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>61<sup>+10</sup><sub>-8</sub> ± 1</td><td>1,2 WICHT</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>69.2 ± 2.2 ± 3.7</td><td>1 SCHUEMANN</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>80<sup>+10</sup><sub>-9</sub> ± 7</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>70.0 ± 1.5 ± 2.8</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AE BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr><tr><td>68.9 ± 2.0 ± 3.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05M BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AE</td></tr><tr><td>76.9 ± 3.5 ± 4.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05M</td></tr><tr><td>79<sup>+12</sup><sub>-11</sub> ± 9</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>01M BELL</td><td>Repl. by SCHUEMANN 06</td></tr><tr><td>70 ± 8 ± 5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01G BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 03W</td></tr><tr><td>65<sup>+15</sup><sub>-14</sub> ± 9</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

2 WICHT 08 reports [Γ(B⁺ → η'K⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(η' (958) → γγ)] = (1.40<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.12</sub>) × 10⁻⁶ which we divide by our best value B(η' (958) → γγ) = (2.307 ± 0.033) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\eta' K^*(892^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{373}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.8<sup>+1.6</sup><sub>-1.4</sub> ± 0.8</td><td></td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 SCHUEMANN</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;14</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>04D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07E</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;35</td><td>90</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;13</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\eta' K_0^{+}(1430^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{374}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.2 ±1.9 ±1.0</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\eta' K_2^{+}(1430^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{375}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>28.0<sup>+4.6</sup><sub>-4.3</sub> ± 2.6</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\eta K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{376}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>2.4 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>2.12 ± 0.23 ± 0.11</td><td></td><td>1 HOI</td><td>12 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.94<sup>+0.39</sup><sub>-0.34</sub> ± 0.21</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.2<sup>+2.8</sup><sub>-2.2</sub></td><td></td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.21<sup>+0.48</sup><sub>-0.42</sub> ± 0.01</td><td>1,2 WICHT</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>Repl. by HOI 12</td></tr><tr><td>3.7 ± 0.4 ± 0.1</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AE BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr><tr><td>1.9 ± 0.3 ± 0.2</td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>07B BELL</td><td>Repl. by HOI 12</td></tr><tr><td>3.3 ± 0.6 ± 0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>05K BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AE</td></tr><tr><td>2.1 ± 0.6 ± 0.2</td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>05A BABR</td><td>Repl. by CHANG 07B</td></tr><tr><td>3.4 ± 0.8 ± 0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04H BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, B 05k</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;14</td><td>90 BEHRENS</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

2 WICHT 08 reports [Γ(B⁺ → ηK⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(η → 2γ)] = (0.87<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.07</sub>) × 10⁻⁶ which we divide by our best value B(η → 2γ) = (39.36 ± 0.18) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\eta K^*(892^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{377}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>19.3 ±1.6 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>19.3<sup>+2.0</sup><sub>-1.9</sub> ± 1.5</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>07B BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>18.9 ± 1.8 ± 1.3</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>26.4<sup>+9.6</sup><sub>-8.2</sub> ± 3.3</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>25.6 ± 4.0 ± 2.4</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>04D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, B 06H</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;30</td><td>90 BEHRENS</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\eta K_0^*(1430^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{378}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>18.2 ±2.6 ±2.6</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\eta K_2^*(1430^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{379}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.1 ±2.7 ±1.4</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\eta(1295) K^+ \times B(\eta(1295) \rightarrow \eta\pi\pi))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{380}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.9<sup>+0.8</sup><sub>-0.7</sub> ± 0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08X BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\eta(1405) K^+ \times B(\eta(1405) \rightarrow \eta\pi\pi))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{381}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08X BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\eta(1405) K^+ \times B(\eta(1405) \rightarrow K^*K))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{382}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08X BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\eta(1475) K^+ \times B(\eta(1475) \rightarrow K^*K))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{383}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>13.8<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-1.7</sub> ± 1.0</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08X BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\xi(1285) K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{384}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08X BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).
# Meson Particle Listings

## B±

$$ \Gamma(f_1(1420)K^+ \times B(f_1(1420) \rightarrow \eta\pi\pi))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{385}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08x</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(f_1(1420)K^+ \times B(f_1(1420) \rightarrow K^* K^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{386}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08x</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\phi(1680)K^+ \times B(\phi(1680) \rightarrow K^* K^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{387}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08x</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(f_0(1500)K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{388}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>3.7 ± 2.2 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>17 ± 4</td><td>± 12</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>20 ± 10</td><td>± 27</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.2 ± 2.2</td><td>± 3.3</td><td>3,4 AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;19</td><td>90</td><td>4,5 AUBERT, B</td><td>05N</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI</td></tr></table>

¹ Measured in the $B^+ \rightarrow K^+ K^- K^+ K^-$ decay.

² Measured in the $B^+ \rightarrow K^+ K_0 S K_0^0$ decay.

³ AUBERT 08AI reports $B(B^+ \rightarrow f_0(1500) K^+) \cdot B(f_0(1500) \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-) = (0.73 \pm 0.21^{+0.47}_{-0.48}) \times 10^{-6}$. We divide this result by our best value of $B(f_0(1500) \rightarrow \pi\pi) = (34.5 \pm 2.2) \times 10^{-2}$ multiplied by 2/3 to account for the $\pi^+ \pi^- \rightarrow \pi^0 \pi^0$ fraction. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best value.

⁴ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

⁵ AUBERT, B 05N reports $B(B^+ \rightarrow f_0(1500) K^+) \cdot B(f_0(1500) \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-) < 4.4 \times 10^{-6}$. We divide this result by our best value of $B(f_0(1500) \rightarrow \pi\pi) = (34.5 \pm 2.2) \times 10^{-2}$ multiplied by 2/3 to account for the $\pi^+ \pi^- \rightarrow \pi^0 \pi^0$ fraction. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best value.

$$ \Gamma(\omega K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{389}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>6.5 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>6.8 ± 0.4</td><td>± 0.4</td><td>1 CHOBANOVA</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>6.3 ± 0.5</td><td>± 0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AE</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.2 ± 2.4</td><td>± 0.8</td><td>1 JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.1 ± 0.6</td><td>± 0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06E</td><td>BABR AUBERT 07AE</td></tr><tr><td>8.1 ± 0.6</td><td>± 0.6</td><td>1 JEN</td><td>06</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHOBANOVA 14</td></tr><tr><td>4.8 ± 0.8</td><td>± 0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04H</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06E</td></tr><tr><td>6.5 ± 1.3</td><td>± 0.6</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>04A</td><td>BELL Repl. by JEN 06</td></tr><tr><td>9.2 ± 2.6</td><td>± 1.3</td><td>1 LU</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by WANG 04A</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.5 ± 7</td><td>± 2</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\omega K^*(892^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{390}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 7.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 3.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06T</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09H</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 7.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05O</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 06T</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 87</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\omega(K\pi)_0^{*+})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{391}/\Gamma $$

($K\pi)_0^{*+}$ is the total S-wave composed of $K_0^*(1430)$ and nonresonant that are described using LASS shape.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>27.5 ± 3.0</td><td>± 2.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K_0^*(1430^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{392}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>24.0 ± 2.6</td><td>± 4.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K_2^*(1430^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{393}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>21.5 ± 3.6</td><td>± 2.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(a_0(980)K^+ \times B(a_0(980) \rightarrow \eta\pi^0))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{395}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of charged and neutral B mesons at T(4S) decays.

$$ \Gamma(a_0(980)K^+ \times B(a_0(980) \rightarrow \eta\pi^+))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{394}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of charged and neutral B mesons at T(4S) decays.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892^+)^0 \pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{396}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>10.1 ± 0.8 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>10.1 ± 1.7</td><td>± 1.0</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>10.8 ± 0.6</td><td>+1.2<br>-1.4</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>9.67 ± 0.64</td><td>+0.81<br>-0.89</td><td>2 GARMASH</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>13.5 ± 1.2</td><td>+0.8<br>-0.9</td><td>2 AUBERT, B</td><td>05N</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI</td></tr><tr><td>9.8 ± 0.9</td><td>+1.1<br>-1.2</td><td>2 GARMASH</td><td>05</td><td>BELL Repl. by GARMASH 06</td></tr><tr><td>15.5 ± 1.8</td><td>+1.5<br>-4.0</td><td>2,3 AUBERT, B</td><td>04P</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 05N</td></tr><tr><td>19.4 ± 4.2</td><td>+4.1<br>-3.9</td><td>4 GARMASH</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by GARMASH 05</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;119</td><td>90</td><td>5 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 16</td><td>90</td><td>2 JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;390</td><td>90</td><td>6 ADAM</td><td>96D</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 41</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;480</td><td>90</td><td>6 ABREU</td><td>95N</td><td>DLPH Sup. by ADAM 96D</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;170</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;150</td><td>90</td><td>7 AVERY</td><td>89B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;260</td><td>90</td><td>8 AVERY</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of $B^+ \rightarrow K_0^0 \pi^+ \pi^0$ decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³ AUBERT 04P also report a branching ratio for $B^+ \rightarrow K^+ \pi^-$ to "higher $K^*$ resonances" $\pi^+$, $K^* \rightarrow K^+ \pi^-$, $(25.1 \pm 2.0)^{+11.0}_{-5.7} \times 10^{-6}$.

⁴ Uses a reference decay mode $B^+ \rightarrow D^0 \pi^+$ and $D^0 \rightarrow K^+ \pi^-$ with $B(B^+ \rightarrow D^0 \pi^+) \cdot B(D^0 \rightarrow K^+ \pi^-) = (20.3 \pm 2.0) \times 10^{-5}$.

⁵ ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \rightarrow b\bar{D}) = (21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the B fractions $f_B^0 = f_{b+} = (39.7^{+1.8}_{-2.2})\%$ and $f_B^0 = (10.5^{+1.8}_{-2.2})\%$.

⁶ Assumes a $B^0$, $B^-$ production fraction of 0.39 and a $B_S$ production fraction of 0.12.

⁷ AVERY 89b reports $< 1.3 \times 10^{-4}$ assuming the T(4S) decays 43% to $B^0 D^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892^+)^0 \pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{397}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>6.8 ± 0.9 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>6.4 ± 0.9</td><td>+0.4<br>-0.5</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>17G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>8.2 ± 1.5</td><td>± 1.1</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>11I</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;31</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05x</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 11I</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;99</td><td>90</td><td>2 JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>6.9 ± 2.0</td><td>± 1.3</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05x</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 11I</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;31</td><td>90</td><td>2 JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;99</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of $B^+ \rightarrow K_0^0 \pi^+ \pi^0$ decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^+\pi^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{398}/\Gamma_{451} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.703 ± 0.011</td><td>± 0.022</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AI</td><td>LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(K^+\pi^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{398}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>51.0 ± 2.9 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>54.4 ± 1.1</td><td>± 4.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AI</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI</td></tr><tr><td>48.8 ± 1.1</td><td>± 3.6</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>06</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>64.1 ± 2.4</td><td>± 4.0</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>05N</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI</td></tr><tr><td>46.6 ± 2.1</td><td>± 4.3</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>05</td><td>BELL Repl. by GARMASH 06</td></tr><tr><td>53.6 ± 3.1</td><td>± 5.1</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>04</td><td>BELL Repl. by GARMASH 05</td></tr><tr><td>59.1 ± 3.8</td><td>± 3.2</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>03M</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT, B 05N</td></tr><tr><td>55.6 ± 5.8</td><td>± 7.7</td><td>3 GARMASH</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by GARMASH 04</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at the T(4S); charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.

³ Uses a reference decay mode $B^+ \rightarrow D^0 \pi^+$ and $D^0 \rightarrow K^+ \pi^-$ with $B(B^+ \rightarrow D^0 \pi^+) \cdot B(D^0 \rightarrow K^+ \pi^-) = (20.3 \pm 2.0) \times 10^{-5}$.
$$ \Gamma(K^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{+} \text{ nonresonant})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{399}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 16.3+2.1/-1.5 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 9.3 \pm 1.0 \frac{6.9}{1.7} \qquad 1,2 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 08\text{AI} \text{ BABR } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 16.9 \pm 1.3 \frac{1.7}{1.6} \qquad 1 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 06 \text{ BELL } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 2.9 \pm 0.6 \frac{0.8}{0.5} \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 05\text{N} \text{ BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI} $$

$$ 17.3 \pm 1.7 \frac{17.2}{8.0} \qquad 1 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 05 \text{ BELL Repl. by GARMASH 06} $$

$$ < 17 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 04\text{P} \text{ BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 05N} $$

$$ <330 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ ADAM} \qquad 96\text{D} \text{ DLPH } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 28 \qquad 90 \qquad \text{BERGFELD} \qquad 96\text{B} \text{ CLE2 } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <400 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ ABREU} \qquad 95\text{N} \text{ DLPH Sup. by ADAM 96D} $$

$$ <330 \qquad 90 \qquad \text{ALBRECHT} \qquad 91\text{E} \text{ ARG } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <190 \qquad 90 \qquad 4 \text{ AVERY} \qquad 89\text{B} \text{ CLEO } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

2 Calculate the total nonresonant contribution by combining the S-wave composed of $K_0^*(1430)$ and nonresonant that are described using LASS shape.

3 Assumes a $B^0$, $B^-$ production fraction of 0.39 and a $B_5$ production fraction of 0.12.

4 AVERY 89b reports $< 1.7 \times 10^{-4}$ assuming the $\mathcal{T}(45)$ decays 43% to $B^0 \bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(\omega(782)K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{400}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ 5.9 \pm \frac{8.8}{9.0} \pm 0.5 \qquad 1,2 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 08\text{AI} \text{ BABR } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

2 AUBERT 08AI reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \rightarrow \omega(782)K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\omega(782) \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-)] = (0.09 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.036) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(\omega(782) \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-) = (1.53 \pm 0.12) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(K^+ f_0(980) \times B(f_0(980) \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{401}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 9.4 +1.0/-1.2 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 10.3 \pm 0.5 \frac{+2.0}{-1.4} \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 08\text{AI} \text{ BABR } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 8.78 \pm 0.82 \frac{+0.85}{-1.76} \qquad 1 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 06 \text{ BELL } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 9.47 \pm 0.97 \frac{+0.62}{-0.88} \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 05\text{N} \text{ BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI} $$

$$ 7.55 \pm 1.24 \frac{+1.63}{-1.18} \qquad 1 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 05 \text{ BELL Repl. by GARMASH 06} $$

$$ 9.2 \pm 1.2 \frac{+2.1}{-2.6} \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 04\text{P} \text{ BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 05N} $$

$$ 9.6 \pm 2.5 \frac{+3.7}{-2.3} \qquad 3 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 02 \text{ BELL Repl. by GARMASH 05} $$

$$ <80 \qquad 90 \qquad 4 \text{ AVERY} \qquad 89\text{B} \text{ CLEO } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

2 AUBERT, 04P also reports $B(B^+ \rightarrow \text{higher } r^0 \text{ resonances}) \pi^+, f(980)^0 \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-) = (3.2 \pm 1.2 \pm 6.0) \times 10^{-6}$.

3 Uses a reference decay mode $B^+ \rightarrow \bar{D}^0 \pi^+$ and $\bar{D}^0 \rightarrow \kappa^+ \pi^-$ with $B(B^+ \rightarrow \bar{D}^0 \pi^+) \times B(\bar{D}^0 \rightarrow \kappa^+ \pi^-) = (20.3 \pm 2.0) \times 10^{-5}$. Only charged pions from the $f_0(980)$ are used.

4 AVERY 89b reports $< 7 \times 10^{-5}$ assuming the $\mathcal{T}(45)$ decays 43% to $B^0 \bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(f_2(1270)^0 K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{402}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 1.07 ± 0.27 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 0.89 \pm 0.38 \frac{+0.01}{-0.33 \pm 0.03} \qquad 1,2 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 08\text{AI} \text{ BABR } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 1.33 \pm 0.30 \frac{+0.23}{-0.34} \qquad 1 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 06 \text{ BELL } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <16 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 05\text{N} \text{ BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI} $$

$$ < 2.3 \qquad 90 \qquad 4 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 05 \text{ BELL Repl. by GARMASH 06} $$

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

2 AUBERT 08AI reports $(0.50 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.15) \times 10^{-6}$ for $B(B^+ \rightarrow f_2(1270) K^+) \times B(f_2^+ \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-)$. We compute $B(B^+ \rightarrow f_2(1270) K^+) \times B(f_2(1270) \rightarrow \pi \pi) = (84.3 \pm 2.8) \times 10^{-2}$ and 2/3 for the $\pi^+ \pi^-$ fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

3 AUBERT, 05N reports $8.9 \times 10^{-6}$ at 90% CL for $B(B^+ \rightarrow f_2(1270) K^+) \times B(f_2(1270) \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-)$. We rescaled it using the PDG value $B(f_2(1270) \rightarrow \pi \pi) = 84.7\%$ and 2/3 for the $\pi^+ \pi^-$ fraction.

4 GARMASH 05 reports $1.3 \times 10^{-6}$ at 90% CL for $B(B^+ \rightarrow f_2(1270) K^+) \times B(f_2(1270) \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-)$. We rescaled it using the PDG value $B(f_2(1270) \rightarrow \pi \pi) = 84.7\%$ and 2/3 for the $\pi^+ \pi^-$ fraction.

$$ \Gamma(f_0(1370)^0 K^+ \times B(f_0(1370)^0 \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{403}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ <10.7 \times 10^{-6} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 05\text{N} \text{ BABR } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

$$ \Gamma(\rho(14500)K^+ \times B(\rho(1450)^0 \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{404}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ <11.7 \times 10^{-6} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 05\text{N} \text{ BABR } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

$$ \Gamma(f'_2(1525)K^+ \times B(f'_2(1525) \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{405}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ <3.4 \times 10^{-6} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 05\text{N} \text{ BABR } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

$$ \Gamma(K^+ \rho^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{406}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 3.7 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 3.56 \pm 0.45 \frac{+0.57}{-0.46} \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 08\text{AI} \text{ BABR } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 3.89 \pm 0.47 \frac{+0.43}{-0.41} \qquad 1 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 06 \text{ BELL } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 5.07 \pm 0.75 \frac{+0.55}{-0.88} \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 05\text{N} \text{ BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI} $$

$$ 4.78 \pm 0.75 \frac{+1.01}{-0.97} \qquad 1 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 05 \text{ BELL Repl. by GARMASH 06} $$

$$ < 6.2 \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 04\text{P} \text{ BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 05N} $$

$$ < 12 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 02 \text{ BELL } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 86 \qquad 90 \qquad 4 \text{ ABE} \qquad 00\text{C} \text{ SLD } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 17 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ JESSOP} \qquad 00 \text{ CLE2 } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <120 \qquad 90 \qquad 5 \text{ ADAM} \qquad 96\text{D} \text{ DLPH } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 19 \qquad 90 \qquad 9 \text{ ASNER} \qquad 96 \text{ CLE2 Repl. by JESSOP 00} $$

$$ <190 \qquad 90 \qquad 5 \text{ ABREU} \qquad 95\text{N} \text{ DLPH Sup. by ADAM 96D} $$

$$ <180 \qquad 90 \qquad \text{ALBRECHT} \qquad 91\text{B} \text{ ARG } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <80 \qquad 90 \qquad 6 \text{ AVERY} \qquad 89\text{B} \text{ CLEO } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <260 \qquad 90 \qquad 87 \text{ CLEO } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\mathcal{T}(45)$.

2 AUBERT 04P reports a central value of $(3.9 \pm 1.2 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-6}$ for this branching ratio.

3 Uses a reference decay mode $B^+ \rightarrow \bar{D}^0 \pi^+$ and $\bar{D}^0 \rightarrow \kappa^+ \pi^-$ with $B(B^+ \rightarrow \bar{D}^0 \pi^+) \times B(\bar{D}^0 \rightarrow \kappa^+ \pi^-) = (20.3 \pm 2.0) \times 10^{-5}$.

4 ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \rightarrow b\bar{D}) = (21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the $B$ fractions $f_{B0} = f_{B^+} = (39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_5} = (10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

5 Assumes production fractions $f_{B0} = f_{B^-} = 0.39$ and $f_{B_5} = 0.12$.

6 AVERY 89b reports $< 7 \times 10^{-5}$ assuming the $\mathcal{T}(45)$ decays 43% to $B^0 \bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K_0^*(1430)^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{407}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

### 39 +6/-5 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 34.6 \pm 3.3 \frac{+4.6}{-6.0} \qquad 1 \text{ LEES} \qquad 17\text{G} \text{ BABR } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 32.0 \pm 1.2 \frac{+10.8}{-6.0} \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT} \qquad 08\text{AI} \text{ BABR } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 51.6 \pm 1.7 \frac{+7.0}{-7.5} \qquad 2 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 06 \text{ BELL } e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 44.4 \pm 2.2 \frac{+5.3}{-10.7} \qquad 2,3 \text{ AUBERT,B} \qquad 05\text{N} \text{ BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08AI} $$

$$ 45.0 \pm 2.9 \frac{+15.0}{-10.7} \qquad 2 \text{ GARMASH} \qquad 05 \text{ BELL Repl. by GARMASH 06} $$

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
39+6.5 (Error scaled by 1.4)

<figure><img src="image_582.png" /></figure>

$\Gamma(K_0^*(1430)^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-6})$
¹Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of $B^{+} \to K_{S}^{0} \pi^{+} \pi^{0}$ decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.

²Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³See erratum: AUBERT, BE 06A.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K_2^*(1430)^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & 5.6^{+2.2}_{-1.5} \pm 0.1 & 1.2 \text{ AUBERT} & 08A1 \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{408}/\Gamma $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

< 23 90

³ AUBERT, B 05N BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08A1

< 6.9 90

⁴ GARMASH 05 BELL $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

<680 90

ALBRECHT 91B ARG $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²AUBERT 08A1 reports $(1.85 \pm 0.41)_{-0.29}^{+0.61} \times 10^{-6}$ for $B(B^{+} \to K_{S}^{*}(1430)^{0} \pi^{+}) \times B(K_{S}^{*}(1430)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-})$. We compute $B(B^{+} \to K_{S}^{*}(1430)^{0} \pi^{+})$ using the PDG value $B(K_{S}^{*}(1430)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-})=(49.9 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-2}$ and 2/3 for the $K^{+} \pi^{-}$ fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

³AUBERT, B 05N reports $7.7 \times 10^{-6}$ at 90% CL for $B(B^{+} \to K_{S}^{*}(1430)^{0} \pi^{+}) \times B(K_{S}^{*}(1430)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-})$. We rescaled it using the PDG value $B(K_{S}^{*}(1430)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-}) = 49.9\%$ and 2/3 for the $K^{+} \pi^{-}$ fraction.

⁴GARMASH 05 reports $2.3 \times 10^{-6}$ at 90% CL for $B(B^{+} \to K_{S}^{*}(1430)^{0} \pi^{+}) \times B(K_{S}^{*}(1430)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-})$. We rescaled it using the PDG value $B(K_{S}^{*}(1430)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-}) = 49.9\%$ and 2/3 for the $K^{+} \pi^{-}$ mode.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^*(1410)^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & <45 & 90 & 1 \text{ GARMASH} & 05 \text{ BELL } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{409}/\Gamma $$

¹GARMASH 05 reports $2.0 \times 10^{-6}$ at 90% CL for $B(B^{+} \to K^{*}(1410)^{0} \pi^{+}) \times B(K^{*}(1410)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-})$. We rescaled it using the PDG value $B(K^{*}(1410)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-}) = 6.6\%$ and 2/3 for the $K^{+} \pi^{-}$ mode.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^*(1680)^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & <12 & 90 & 1 \text{ GARMASH} & 05 \text{ BELL } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{410}/\Gamma $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<15 90

²AUBERT, B 05N BABR $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹GARMASH 05 reports $3.1 \times 10^{-6}$ at 90% CL for $B(B^{+} \to K^{*}(1680)^{0} \pi^{+}) \times B(K^{*}(1680)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-})$. We rescaled it using the PDG value $B(K^{*}(1680)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-}) = 38.7\%$ and 2/3 for the $K^{+} \pi^{-}$ mode.

²AUBERT, B 05N reports $3.8 \times 10^{-6}$ at 90% CL for $B(B^{+} \to K^{*}(1680)^{0} \pi^{+}) \times B(K^{*}(1680)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-})$. We rescaled it using the PDG value $B(K^{*}(1680)^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-}) = 38.7\%$ and 2/3 for the $K^{+} \pi^{-}$ fraction.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^{+} \pi^{0} \pi^{+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & 16.2^{+1.2}_{-1.5} & 11 & 1 \text{ LEES} & 11 \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{411}/\Gamma $$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(f_0(980) K^{+} \times B(f_0 \to \pi^0 \pi^0)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & 2.8^{+0.6}_{-0.5} & 11 & 1 \text{ LEES} & 11 \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{412}/\Gamma $$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & <4.6 \times 10^{-8} & 90 & \text{AAIJ} & 17E LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{413}/\Gamma $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<9.5 \times 10^{-7} 90

¹AUBERT 08BE BABR $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

<4.5 \times 10^{-6} 90

¹GARMASH 04 BELL $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

<1.8 \times 10^{-6} 90

²AUBERT 03M BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08BE

<7.0 \times 10^{-6} 90

³GARMASH 02 BELL $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Assumes equal production of $B^{0}$ and $B^{+}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$; charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.

³Uses a reference decay mode $B^{+} \to D^{0} \pi^{+}$ and $D^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-}$ with $B(B^{+} \to D^{0} \pi^{+}) \cdot B(D^{0} \to K^{+} \pi^{-}) = (20.3 \pm 2.0) \times 10^{-5}$.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{+} \text{nonresonant}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & <56 & 90 & \text{BERGFELD} & 96B CLE2 e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{414}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K_1(1270)^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & <4.0 \times 10^{-5} & 90 & 1 \text{ AUBERT} & 10 \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{415}/\Gamma $$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K_1(1400)^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & <3.9 \times 10^{-5} & 90 & 1 \text{ AUBERT} & 10 \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{416}/\Gamma $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<2.6 \times 10^{-3} 90

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^0 \pi^+ \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & 31.8^{+1.8}_{-2.1} & 90 & 1 \text{ LEES} & 17 \text{ GABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{417}/\Gamma $$

²ECKHART 02 CLE2 $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

¹Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of $B^{+} \to K_{S}^{0} \pi^{+} \pi^{0}$ decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.

²Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^0 \rho^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & 7.3^{+1.0}_{-1.2} & 90 & 1 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{419}/\Gamma $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline 6.5 \pm 1.1 & 1.0 & 1.9 & 1 \text{ LEES} & 17 \text{ GABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \\ 8.0 \pm 1.4 & 1.3 & 0.6 & \text{AUBERT} & 07 \text{ ZABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<48 90

¹Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of $B^{+} \to K_{S}^{0} \pi^{+} \pi^{0}$ decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K_0^*(1430) \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & 11.9^{+1.7}_{-1.6} & 90 & 1 \text{ LEES} & 17 \text{ GABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{418}/\Gamma $$

¹Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of $B^{+} \to K_{S}^{0} \pi^{+} \pi^{0}$ decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^*(892)^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & 75.3^{+6.0}_{-8.1} & 90 & 1 \text{ AUBERT, B} & 06U \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{420}/\Gamma $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<1100 90

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^*(892)^+ \rho^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & 4.6^{+1.0}_{-0.4} & 90 & 1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11D} & 06 \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{421}/\Gamma $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

< 6.1 90

¹AUBERT, B 06G BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11D

<74 90

²GODANG 02 CLE2 $e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

<900 90

³Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^{*}(892) f_0(980)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & 4.2^{+0.6}_{-0.3} & 1 & 1 \text{ DEL-AMO-SA..11D} & 06 \text{ BABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{422}/\Gamma $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

5.2 ± 1.2 ± 0.5 1 AUBERT, B 06G BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 11D

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(a_1^+ K^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & 34.9^{+5.0}_{-4.4} & 1,2 \text{ AUBERT} & 08 \text{ FABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{423}/\Gamma $$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Assumes $a_1^{\pm}$ decays only to $3\pi$ and $B(a_1^{\pm} \to \pi^{\pm} \pi^{\mp}) = 0.5$.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(b_1^+ K^0 \times B(b_1^+ \to \omega \pi^+)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ \hline \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & & 9.6^{+1.7}_{-0.9} & 1 \text{ AUBERT} & 08 \text{ AG BABR } e^+ e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \end{array} \qquad \Gamma_{424}/\Gamma $$

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
$$
\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \rho^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{425} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
</table>

9.2±1.5 OUR AVERAGE

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>9.6±1.7±1.5</td>
    <td>1 AUBERT,B</td>
    <td>06G</td>
    <td>BABR</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>8.9±1.7±1.2</td>
    <td>1 ZHANG</td>
    <td>05D</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → γ(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(K_1(1400)^0 + \rho^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{426} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;7.8 &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>91B</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

$$
\Gamma(K_2^*(1430)^0 + \rho^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{427} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;1.5 &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>ALBRECHT</td>
      <td>91B</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

$$
\Gamma(b_1^0 K^+ \times B(b_1^0 \rightarrow \omega\pi^0)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{428} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>9.1±1.7±1.0</td>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>07BI</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(b_1^+ K^* 0 \times B(b_1^+ \rightarrow \omega\pi^+)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{429} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;5.9 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>09AF</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(b_0^0 K^+ \times B(b_0^0 \rightarrow \omega\pi^0)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{430} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;6.7 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>09AF</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(K^+ \bar{K}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{431} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
</table>

1.32±0.17 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

1.19±0.18 OUR AVERAGE

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>1.11±0.19±0.05</td>
    <td>1 DUH</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>1.61±0.44±0.09</td>
    <td>1 AUBERT,BE</td>
    <td>06C</td>
    <td>BABR</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>1.22<sup>+0.32</sup><sub>-0.28</sub> ± 0.13</td>
      <td>1 LIN</td>
      <td>07</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
      <td>Repl. by DUH 13</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>1.0 ± 0.4 ± 0.1</td>
      <td>1 ABE</td>
      <td>05G</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
      <td>Repl. by LIN 07</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>1.5 ± 0.5 ± 0.1</td>
      <td>1 AUBERT,BE</td>
      <td>05E</td>
      <td>BABR</td>
      <td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 06C</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt; 2.5</td>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>04M</td>
      <td>BABR</td>
      <td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 05E</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt; 3.3</td>
      <td>1 CHAO</td>
      <td>04</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt; 3.3</td>
      <td>1 BORNHEIM</td>
      <td>03</td>
      <td>CLE2</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt; 2.0</td>
      <td>1 CASEY</td>
      <td>02</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
      <td>Repl. by CHAO 04</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt; 5.0</td>
      <td>1 ABE</td>
      <td>01H</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt; 2.4</td>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>01E</td>
      <td>BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt; 5.1</td>
      <td>1 CRONIN-HEN..00</td>
      <td>CLE2</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
      <td>Repl. by T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;21</td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>GODANG</td>
      <td>98</td>
      <td>Repl. by CRONIN-HENNESSY 00</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(K^+ \bar{K}^0) / \Gamma(K^0 \pi^+) \qquad \Gamma_{431} / \Gamma_{370}
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>0.055±0.007 OUR FIT</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
      <td>Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>0.064±0.009±0.004</td>
    <td>AAIJ</td>
    <td>13BS</td>
    <td>LHCB</td>
    <td>pp at 7 TeV</td>
  </tr>
</table>

$$
\Gamma(\bar{K}^0 K^+ \pi^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{432} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;24 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>1 ECKHART</td>
      <td>02</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(K^+ K_5^0 K_5^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{433} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
</table>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>10.5 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>10.42 ± 0.43 ± 0.22</td>
      <td>1 KALIYAR</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>10.6 ± 0.5 ± 0.3</td>
      <td>1,2 LEES</td>
      <td>120</td>
      <td>BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>10.6 ± 0.5 ± 0.3</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>10.42 ± 0.43 ± 0.22</td>
      <td>1 KALIYAR</td>
      <td>19</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>10.6 ± 0.5 ± 0.3</td>
      <td>1,2 LEES</td>
      <td>120</td>
      <td>BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>10.7 ± 1.2 ± 1.0</td>
    <td>1 AUBERT,B</td>
    <td>04V</td>
    <td>BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by LEES 120</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>13.4 ± 1.9 ± 1.5</td>
    <td>1 GARMASH</td>
    <td>04</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>Repl. by KALIYAR 19</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²All intermediate charmonium and charm resonances are removed, except of χ$_{c}$$_{0}$.

$$
\Gamma(f_0(980) K^+, f_0 \to K_5^0 K_5^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{434} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>14.7±2.8±1.8</td>
      <td>1 LEES</td>
      <td>120</td>
      <td>BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(f_0(1710) K^+, f_0 \to K_5^0 K_5^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{435} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>0.48<sup>+0.40</sup><sub>-0.24</sub></td>
      <td>1 LEES</td>
      <td>120</td>
      <td>BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(K^+ K_5^0 K_5^0 \text{ nonresonant}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{436} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
</table>

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>19.8±3.7±2.5</td>
    <td>1 LEES</td>
    <td>120</td>
    <td>BABR</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(K_5^0 K_5^0 \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{437} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>&lt;5.1 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
      <td>90</td>
      <td>1 AUBERT</td>
      <td>09J</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;8.7 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
    <td>1 KALIYAR</td>
    <td>19</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;3.2 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>1 GARMASH</td>
    <td>04</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(K^+ K^- \pi^+) / \Gamma(K^+ K^- K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{438} / \Gamma_{451}
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>0.151±0.004±0.008</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>AAIJ</td>
      <td>20AJ</td>
      <td>LHCB pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

$$
\Gamma(K^+ K^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{438} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
</table>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>5.2 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>5.38 ± 0.40 ± 0.35</td>
      <td>1,2 HSU</td>
      <td>17</td>
      <td>BELL</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>5.0 ± 0.5 ± 0.5</td>
      <td>2 AUBERT</td>
      <td>07BB</td>
      <td>BABR</td>
      <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;13</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 GARMASH</td>
    <td>04</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt; 6.3</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2,3 AUBERT</td>
    <td>03M</td>
    <td>BABR</td>
    <td>Repl. by AUBERT 07BB</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;12</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>4 GARMASH</td>
    <td>02</td>
    <td>BELL</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹HSU 17 provides also measurement as a function of K⁺K⁻ invariant mass.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³Charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.

⁴Uses a reference decay mode B⁺ → D⁰π⁺ and D⁰ → K⁺π⁻ with B(B⁺ → D⁰π⁺)B(D⁰ → K⁺π⁻) = (20.3 ± 2.0) × 10⁻⁵.

$$
\Gamma(K^+ K^- \pi^+ \text{ nonresonant}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{439} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>1.68±0.23±0.13</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>1 AAIJ</td>
      <td>19AL</td>
      <td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;75</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>BERGFELD</td>
    <td>96B</td>
    <td>CLE2</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹AAIJ 19AL reports 0.323 ± 0.015 ± 0.041 fit fraction for B⁺ → K⁺K⁻π⁺ nonresonant from the amplitude analysis of B⁺ → π⁺K⁺K⁻ decays. We use the PDG 19 value B(B⁺ → K⁺K⁻π⁺) = (5.2 ± 0.4) × 10⁻⁶ to obtain B(B⁺ → K⁺K⁻π⁺) nonresonant. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

$$
\Gamma(K^+ \bar{K}^* (892)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{440} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>5.9±0.6±0.5</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>1 AAIJ</td>
      <td>19AL</td>
      <td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt; 11</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 AUBERT</td>
    <td>07AR</td>
    <td>BABR</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;1290</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>00B OPAL</td>
    <td>00B</td>
    <td>OPAL</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;1380</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>3 ABE</td>
    <td>00C SLD</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt; 53</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 JESSOP</td>
    <td>00</td>
    <td>CLE2</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹AAIJ 19AL reports (7.5 ± 0.6 ± 0.5) × 10⁻² fit fraction for B⁺ → K⁺K⁻π⁺ from the amplitude analysis of B⁺ → π⁺K⁺K⁻ decays. We use the PDG 19 value B(B⁺ → K⁺K⁻π⁺) = (5.2 ± 0.4) × 10⁻⁶ to obtain B(B⁺ → K⁺K⁻π⁺) nonresonant. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³ABE 00C assumes B(Z → bD̄) = (21.7 ± 0.1)% and the B fractions f<sub>B0</sub>=f<sub>B+</sub> = (39.7 +1.8) % and f<sub>B̄</sub> = (10.5 +1.8) %.

$$
\Gamma(K^+ \bar{K}^0 (1430)^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{441} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>CL%</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>0.38±0.12±0.05</td>
      <td></td>
      <td>1 AAIJ</td>
      <td>19AL</td>
      <td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table>
  <tr>
    <td>&lt;2.2</td>
    <td>90</td>
    <td>2 AUBERT</td>
    <td>07AR</td>
    <td>BABR</td>
    <td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td>
  </tr>
</table>

¹AAIJ 19AL reports (4.5 ± 0.7 ± 1.2) × 10⁻² for fit fraction for B⁺ → K⁺K⁻<sub>0</sub>(1430)<sup>0</sup> from the amplitude analysis of B⁺ → π⁺K⁺K⁻ decays. We use the PDG 19 value B(B⁺ → K⁺K⁻π⁺) = (5.2 ± 0.4) × 10⁻⁶ to obtain B(B⁺ → K⁺K⁻<sub>0</sub>(1430)<sup>0</sup>), K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> → K⁺π⁻). We compute B(B⁺ → K⁺K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>) using 2/3 of PDG 19 value B(K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>) → Kπ = (93 ± 10)% for the K⁺π⁻ fraction. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$
\Gamma(\rho(1450)^0 \pi^+, \rho^0 \to K^+ K^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{508} / \Gamma
$$

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th>
      <th>DOCUMENT ID</th>
      <th>TECN</th>
      <th>COMMENT</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>1.60±0.08±0.12</td>
      <td>1 AAIJ</td>
      <td>19AL</td>
      <td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

¹AAIJ 19AL reports 0.307 ± 0.012 ± 0.009 fit fraction for B⁺ → ρ(1450)π⁺ from the amplitude analysis of B⁺ → π⁺K⁺K⁻ decays. We use the PDG 19 value B(B⁺ → K⁺K⁻π⁺) = (5.2 ± 0.4) × 10⁻⁶ to obtain B(B⁺ → ρ(1450)π⁺, ρ(1450) → K⁺K⁻). Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.
$\Gamma(\pi^{+}(K^{+}K^{-})S-wave)/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{442}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

8.53±0.67±0.66

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AL LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 19AL reports 0.164 ± 0.008 ± 0.01 fit fraction for $B^{+} \to \pi^{+}(K^{+}K^{-})S-wave$ in the region of 0.95 < $m(K^{+}K^{-})$ < 1.42 GeV/c² from the amplitude analysis of $B^{\pm} \to \pi^{\pm}K^{+}K^{-}$ decays. We use the PDG 19 value $B(B^{+} \to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}) = (5.2 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-6}$ to obtain $B(B^{+} \to \pi^{+}(K^{+}K^{-})S-wave)$. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

$\Gamma(\pi^{+}K^{+}K^{-}, m_{K^{+}K^{-}} < 1.1 \text{ GeV})/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{443}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

5.38±0.40±0.35

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 HSU</td><td>23 BELL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Investigated the angular distribution of $K^{+}K^{-}$ pairs with invariant mass below 1.1 GeV/c², which exhibits both a strong enhancement in signal and very large direct CP violation.

$\Gamma(K^{+}K^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{444}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.1 × 10⁻⁸</td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>17E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6 × 10⁻⁷</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BE BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(4S)$</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.4 × 10⁻⁶</td><td>90</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(4S)$</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.3 × 10⁻⁶</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>03M BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BE</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.2 × 10⁻⁶</td><td>90</td><td>3 GARMASH</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Gamma(4S)$</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2 Assumes equal production of $B^{0}$ and $B^{+}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$; charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.

3 Uses a reference decay mode $B^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}$ and $D^{0} \to K^{+}\pi^{-}$ with $B(B^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}) \cdot B(D^{0} \to K^{+}\pi^{-}) = (20.3 \pm 2.0) \times 10^{-5}$.

$\Gamma(K^{+}K^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{445}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;87.9</td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ABBENDI</td><td>00B OPAL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(f'_{2}(1525)K^{+})/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{446}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

1.8 ±0.5 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID
TECN
COMMENT

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.56 ±0.36 ±0.30</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>120 BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.8 ±0.9 ±0.5</td><td>1,3 LEES</td><td>120 BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8</td><td>90</td><td>1,4 GARMASH</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2 Measured in the $B^{+} \to K^{+}K^{-}K^{+}$ decay.

3 Measured in the $B^{+} \to K^{+}K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}$ decay.

4 GARMASH 05 reports $B(B^{+} \to f'_{2}(1525) K^{+}) \cdot B(f'_{2}(1525) \to K^{+}K^{-}) < 4.9 \times 10^{-6}$ at 90% CL. We divide this result by our best value of $B(f'_{2}(1525) \to K\bar{K}) = 88.8 \times 10^{-2}$ multiplied by 2/3 to account for the $K^{+}K^{-}$ fraction.

$\Gamma(K^{+}f_{j}(2220))/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{447}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>not seen</td><td>1 HUANG</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(K^{+}\pi^{+}K^{-})/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{448}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;11.8</td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06U BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(K^{*}(892) + K^{*}(892)^{0})/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{449}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

0.91 ±0.29 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID
TECN
COMMENT

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.77 ±0.35</td><td>1 GOH</td><td>15 BELL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.2 ±0.5 ±0.1</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09F BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;71</td><td>90</td><td>3 GODANG</td><td>02 CLE2</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Signal significance is 2.7 standard deviations. This measurement corresponds to an upper limit of < 1.31 × 10⁻⁶ at 90% CL.

2 Signal significance is 3.7 standard deviations.

3 Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 4.8 × 10⁻⁵.

$\Gamma(K^{+}K^{+}\pi^{-})/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{450}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.1</td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06U BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(K^{+}K^{-}K^{+})/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{451}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

34.0 ±1.4 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID
TECN
COMMENT

Error includes scale factor of 1.4.

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>34.6 ±0.6 ±0.9</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>120 BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>30.6 ±1.2 ±2.3</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>35.2 ±0.9 ±1.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>060 BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 120</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>32.8 ±1.8 ±2.8</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by GARMASH 05</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>29.6 ±2.1 ±1.6</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>03M BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 060</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>35.3 ±3.7 ±4.5</td><td>4 GARMASH</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by GARMASH 04</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;200</td><td>5 ADAM</td><td>96D DLPH</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;320</td><td>5 ABREU</td><td>95N DLPH</td><td>Sup. by ADAM 96D</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;350</td><td>90 ALBRECHT</td><td>91E ARG</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2 All intermediate charmonium and charm resonances are removed, except of $\chi_{c0}$.

3 Assumes equal production of $B^{0}$ and $B^{+}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$; charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.

4 Uses a reference decay mode $B^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}$ and $D^{0} \to K^{+}\pi^{-}$ with $B(B^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}) \cdot B(D^{0} \to K^{+}\pi^{-}) = (20.3 \pm 2.0) \times 10^{-5}$.

5 Assumes $B^{0}$ and $B^{-}$ production fractions of 0.39, and $B_{S}$ production fraction of 0.12.

$\Gamma(K^{+}\phi)/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{452}/\Gamma$

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

8.8 ±0.7 ±0.6 OUR AVERAGE

DOCUMENT ID
TECN
COMMENT

Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.2 ±0.4 ±0.7</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>120 BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>7.6 ±1.3 ±0.6</td><td>2 ACOSTA</td><td>05J CDF</td><td>$p\bar{p} \to 1.96 \text{ TeV}$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>9.60 ±0.92 ±1.05</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.5 ±2.1 ±0.6</td><td>1 BRIERE</td><td>01 CLE2</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.4 ±0.7 ±0.7</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>060 BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 120</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>10.0 ±0.9 ±0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04A BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 060</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>9.4 ±1.1 ±0.7</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>03B BELL</td><td>Repl. by GARMASH 05</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>14.6 ±3.0 ±2.0</td><td>3 GARMASH</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHEN 03B</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>7.7 ±1.6 ±1.4 ±0.8</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01D BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;144</td><td>4 ABE</td><td>00C SLD</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5</td><td>90 BERGFELD</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;280</td><td>90 ADAM</td><td>96D DLPH</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to Z$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 12</td><td>90 ASNER</td><td>96 CLE2</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;440</td><td>90 ABREU</td><td>95N DLPH</td><td>Sup. by ADAM 96D</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;180</td><td>90 ALBRECHT</td><td>91B ARG</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;90</td><td>90 AVERY</td><td>89B CLEO</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;210</td><td>90 AVERY</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2 Uses $B(B^{+} \to J/\psi K^{+}) = (1.00 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-3}$ and $B(J/\psi \to \mu^{+}\mu^{-}) = 0.0588 \pm 0.0010$.

3 Uses a reference decay mode $B^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}$ and $D^{0} \to K^{+}\pi^{-}$ with $B(B^{+} \to D^{0}\pi^{+}) \cdot B(D^{0} \to K^{+}\pi^{-}) = (20.3 \pm 2.0) \times 10^{-5}$.

4 ABE 00C assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = (21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the $B$ fractions $f_{B0} = f_{B^{+}} = (39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_{S}} = (10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

5 ADAM 96D assumes $f_{B0} = f_{B^{-}} = 0.39$ and $f_{B_{S}} = 0.12$.

6 Assumes a $B^{0}$, $B^{-}$ production fraction of 0.39 and a $B_{S}$ production fraction of 0.12.

7 AVERY 89B reports < 8 × 10⁻⁵ assuming the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^{0}\bar{B}^{0}$. We rescale to 50%.

$\Gamma(f_{0}(980)K^{+} \times B(f_{0}(980) \to K^{+}K^{-}))/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{453}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.4 ±1.6 ±2.8</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>120 BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 LEES</td><td>120 BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.5 ±2.5 ±1.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>060 BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.9</td><td>90 GARMASH</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(\beta_{2}(1320)K^{+} \times B(\beta_{2}(1320) \to K^{+}K^{-}))/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{454}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.1 × 10⁻⁶</td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(X_{0}(1550)K^{+} \times B(X_{0}(1550) \to K^{+}K^{-}))/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{455}/\Gamma$

$X_{0}(1550)$ is a possible spin zero state near 1.55 GeV/c² invariant mass of $K^{+}K^{-}$.

VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)

4.3 ±0.6 ±0.3

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>060 BABR</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$\Gamma(\phi(1680)K^{+} \times B(\phi(1680) \to K^{+}K^{-}))/\Gamma_{total}$

$\Gamma_{456}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10⁻⁶)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.8 × 10⁻⁶</td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Upsilon(4S)$</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
$$ \Gamma(f_0(1710)K^+ \times B(f_0(1710) \rightarrow K^+K^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{457}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.12±0.25±0.50</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.7 ±1.0 ±0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>060</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 120</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^+K^- \text{ nonresonant})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{458}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

23.8<sup>+2.8</sup><sub>-5.0</sub> OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>22.8±2.7±7.6</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>24.0±1.5<sup>+2.6</sup><sub>-6.0</sub></td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>05</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>50.0±6.0±4.0</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>060</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 120</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;38</td><td>90</td><td>BERGFELD</td><td>96B CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{459}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>36.2±3.3±3.6</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>060</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1600</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91E ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^+\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{460}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.0±2.0 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.7.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11.2±1.0±0.9</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07BA</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.7<sup>+2.1</sup><sub>-1.9</sub>±0.7</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>12.7<sup>+2.2</sup><sub>-2.0</sub>±1.1</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03V</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07BA</td></tr><tr><td>9.7<sup>+4.2</sup><sub>-3.4</sub>±1.7</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01D</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 03V</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 22.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 BRIERE</td><td>01 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 41</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98 CLE2</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 70</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1300</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^0K^+K^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{461}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>34.01±0.74±3.23</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B⁺ → J/ψK⁺ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi K^+, J/\psi \rightarrow K^0 K^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{462}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.43±0.12±1.23</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B⁺ → η_c K⁺ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}K^+, \chi_{c1} \rightarrow K^0K^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{463}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.25±0.11±0.22</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B⁺ → J/ψK⁺ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\eta_c K^+, \eta_c \rightarrow K^0 K^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{464}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.83±0.07±0.29</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B⁺ → J/ψK⁺ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\eta_c(2S)K^+, \eta_c(2S) \rightarrow K^0K^-\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{465}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.27±0.17±0.34</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B⁺ → J/ψK⁺ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(K^0K^+K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{466}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>28.01±0.68±2.89</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B⁺ → J/ψK⁺ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi K^+, J/\psi \rightarrow K^0 K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{467}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.41±0.14±1.25</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B⁺ → η_c K⁺ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}K^+, \chi_{c1} \rightarrow K^0 K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{468}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.06±0.12±0.30</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B⁺ → J/ψK⁺ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\eta_c K^+, \eta_c \rightarrow K^0 K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{469}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.00±0.14±0.31</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B⁺ → J/ψK⁺ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\eta_c(2S)K^+, \eta_c(2S) \rightarrow K^0 K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{470}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.13±0.21±0.52</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AH LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B⁺ → J/ψK⁺ uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(\phi(K\pi^0)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{471}/\Gamma $$

(Kπ)⁺ is the total S-wave composed of K₀(1430) and nonresonant that are described using LASS shape.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.3±1.4±0.8</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\phi K_1(1270)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{472}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.1±1.6±1.1</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\phi K_1(1400)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{473}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 3.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1100</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\phi K^*(1410)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{474}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\phi K_0^*(1430)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{475}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.0±1.3±0.9</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\phi K_2^*(1430)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{476}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.4±1.8±1.0</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3400</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\phi K_2^*(1770)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{477}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;15.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(\phi K_2^*(1820)^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{478}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;16.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BI</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(a_1^+K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{479}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.6</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA...10I</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes B(a₁⁺ → π⁺π⁺π⁺) = 0.5

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).
# Meson Particle Listings

B$^{±}$

$$\Gamma(K^{+} \phi \phi) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{480}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

4.2 ±0.8 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.2. See the ideogram below.

<table><tr><td>3.43</td><td>+0.48</td><td>±0.22</td><td>1 MOHANTY</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>5.6</td><td>±0.5</td><td>±0.3</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>11A BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.6</td><td>+1.1</td><td>±0.3</td><td>1 HUANG</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>7.5</td><td>±1.0</td><td>±0.7</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06H BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 11A</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^0$ and B$^+$ at the T(4S) and the $\phi\phi$ invariant mass below 2.85 GeV/c$^2$.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
4.2±0.8 (Error scaled by 2.2)

<figure><img src="image_583.png" /></figure>

(Confidence Level = 0.0072)

$$\Gamma(K^{+} \phi \phi) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \text{ (units } 10^{-6}\text{)}$$

$$\Gamma(\eta' \eta' K^{+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{481}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><u>&lt;25</u></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06P BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

$$\Gamma(\omega \phi K^{+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{482}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><u>&lt;1.9</u></td><td>90</td><td>1 LIU</td><td>09 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

$$\Gamma(X(1812) K^{+} \times B(X \to \omega \phi)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{483}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><u>&lt;0.32</u></td><td>90</td><td>1 LIU</td><td>09 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

$$\Gamma(K^{*}(892)^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{484}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

3.92±0.22 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.7.

<table><tr><td>3.76</td><td>±0.10</td><td>±0.12</td><td>1 HORIGUCHI</td><td>17 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>4.22</td><td>±0.14</td><td>±0.16</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09A BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>3.76</td><td>+0.89</td><td>±0.28</td><td>3 COAN</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>3.87</td><td>±0.28</td><td>±0.26</td><td>4 AUBERT,BE</td><td>04A BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09A</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>4.25</td><td>±0.31</td><td>±0.24</td><td>3 NAKAO</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by HORIGUCHI 17</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>3.83</td><td>±0.62</td><td>±0.22</td><td>3 AUBERT,BE</td><td>02C BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 04A</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>5.7</td><td>±3.1</td><td>±1.1</td><td>5 AMMAR</td><td>93 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by COAN 00</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 55</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>6 ALBRECHT</td><td>89G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 55</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>6 AVERY</td><td>89B CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;180</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>6 AVERY</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

1 Uses B(T(4S) → B$^+B^-$) = (51.4 ± 0.6)% and B(T(4S) → B$^0B^0$) = (48.6 ± 0.6)%.

2 Uses B(T(4S) → B$^+B^-$) = (51.6 ± 0.6)% and B(T(4S) → B$^0B^0$) = (48.4 ± 0.6)%.

3 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

4 Uses the production ratio of charged and neutral B from T(4S) decays R$^{+}/0$ = 1.006 ± 0.048.

5 AMMAR 93 observed 4.1 ± 2.3 events above background.

6 Assumes the T(4S) decays 43% to B$^0B^0$.

$$\Gamma(K_1(1270)^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{485}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

4.4 +0.7 -0.6 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>4.41</td><td>+0.63</td><td>±0.58</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>4.3</td><td>±0.9</td><td>±0.9</td><td>3 YANG</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 9.9</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>3 NISHIDA</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by YANG 05</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;730</td><td>90</td><td></td><td>4 ALBRECHT</td><td>89G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

1 Requires $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c$^2$.

2 Uses $B(T(4S) \to B^+B^-) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

3 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

4 ALBRECHT 89G reports < 0.0066 assuming the T(4S) decays 45% to B$^0B^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$\Gamma(\eta' K^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{486}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

7.9±0.9 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>7.7</td><td>±1.0</td><td>±0.4</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>09 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>8.4</td><td>+1.5</td><td>+1.2</td><td>2,3 NISHIDA</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>10.0</td><td>±1.3</td><td>±0.5</td><td>1,2 AUBERT,B</td><td>06M BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09</td></tr></table>

1 $m_{\eta'K} < 3.25$ GeV/c$^2$.

2 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

3 $m_{\eta'K} < 2.4$ GeV/c$^2$.

$$\Gamma(\eta' K^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{487}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.9+1.0 -0.9 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>3.6</td><td>±1.2</td><td>±0.4</td><td>1,2 WEDD</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.9</td><td>+1.5</td><td>-0.2</td><td>1,3 AUBERT,B</td><td>06M BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

2 $m_{\eta'K} < 3.4$ GeV/c$^2$.

3 Set the upper limit of 4.2 × 10$^{-6}$ at 90% CL with $m_{\eta'K} < 3.25$ GeV/c$^2$.

$$\Gamma(\phi K^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{488}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.7 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

<table><tr><td>2.48</td><td>±0.30</td><td>±0.24</td><td>1 SAHOO</td><td>11A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>3.5</td><td>±0.6</td><td>±0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07Q BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>3.4</td><td>±0.9</td><td>±0.4</td><td>1 DRUTSKOY</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by SAHOO 11A</td></tr></table>

1 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at T(4S).

$$\Gamma(K^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{489}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.58±0.15 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.

<table><tr><td>2.45</td><td>±0.09</td><td>±0.12</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.95</td><td>±0.13</td><td>±0.20</td><td>1,3 AUBERT</td><td>07R BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.50</td><td>±0.18</td><td>±0.22</td><td>3,4 YANG</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>2.4</td><td>±0.5</td><td>+0.4</td><td>3,5 NISHIDA</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by YANG 05</td></tr></table>

1 $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c$^2$.

2 Uses $B(T(4S) \to B^+B^-) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

3 Assumes equal production of B$^+$ and B$^0$ at the T(4S).

4 $M_{K\pi\pi} < 2.0$ GeV/c$^2$.

5 $M_{K\pi\pi} < 2.4$ GeV/c$^2$.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
2.58±0.15 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_584.png" /></figure>

(Confidence Level = 0.198)

$$\Gamma(K^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \text{ (units } 10^{-5}\text{)}$$

$$\Gamma(K^{*}(892)^{0} \pi^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$$

$\Gamma_{490}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

2.33±0.12 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>2.34</td><td>±0.09</td><td>+0.08</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.0</td><td>±0.7</td><td>±0.2</td><td>3,4 NISHIDA</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>
¹Requires $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

²Uses $B(\tau(4S) \rightarrow B^{+}B^{-}) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

³Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

⁴$M_{K\pi\pi} < 2.4$ GeV/c².

$$ \Gamma(K^{+} \rho^{-} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{491} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.2 &plusmn; 0.4 &plusmn; 0.8</td><td></td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;20</td><td>90</td><td>3,4 NISHIDA</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Requires $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

²Uses $B(\tau(4S) \rightarrow B^{+}B^{-}) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

³Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

⁴$M_{K\pi\pi} < 2.4$ GeV/c².

$$ \Gamma(K^{+} \pi^{-})_{\text{NR}} / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{492} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.9 &plusmn; 0.7 &plusmn; 1.5<br>-1.9</td><td></td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;9.2</td><td>90</td><td>3,4 NISHIDA</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Requires $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

²Uses $B(\tau(4S) \rightarrow B^{+}B^{-}) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

³Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

⁴$M_{K\pi\pi} < 2.4$ GeV/c².

$$ \Gamma(K^{0} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{493} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.56 &plusmn; 0.42 &plusmn; 0.31</td><td></td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>07R</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹$M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

²Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(K_{1}(1400)^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{494} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.7 &plusmn; 4.6 &plusmn; 2.9<br>-2.9 &plusmn; 2.4</td><td></td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 15</td><td>90</td><td>3 YANG</td><td>05</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 50</td><td>90</td><td>3 NISHIDA</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by YANG 05</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2200</td><td>90</td><td>4 ALBRECHT</td><td>89G</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Requires $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

²Uses $B(\tau(4S) \rightarrow B^{+}B^{-}) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

³Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

⁴ALBRECHT 89G reports < 0.0020 assuming the $\tau(4S)$ decays 45% to $B^{0}\bar{B}^{0}$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K^{*}(1410)^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{495} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.71 &plusmn; 0.54 &plusmn; 0.59<br>-0.48 &plusmn; 0.37</td><td></td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Requires $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

²Uses $B(\tau(4S) \rightarrow B^{+}B^{-}) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

$$ \Gamma(K_{0}^{*}(1430)^{0} \pi^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{496} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.32 &plusmn; 0.09 &plusmn; 0.24<br>-0.10 &plusmn; 0.30</td><td></td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Requires $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

²Uses $B(\tau(4S) \rightarrow B^{+}B^{-}) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

$$ \Gamma(K_{2}^{*}(1430)^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{497} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.4 &plusmn; 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.87 &plusmn; 0.70 &plusmn; 0.87</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.53 &minus; 1.04</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.45 &plusmn; 0.40 &plusmn; 0.15</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;140</td><td>90</td><td>4 ALBRECHT</td><td>89G</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Requires $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

²Uses $B(\tau(4S) \rightarrow B^{+}B^{-}) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

³Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

⁴ALBRECHT 89G reports < 0.0013 assuming the $\tau(4S)$ decays 45% to $B^{0}\bar{B}^{0}$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K^{*}(1680)^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{498} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.67 &plusmn; 0.93 &plusmn; 1.44<br>-0.78 &plusmn; 1.14</td><td></td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;190</td><td>90</td><td>3 ALBRECHT</td><td>89G</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Requires $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

²Uses $B(\tau(4S) \rightarrow B^{+}B^{-}) = 0.513 \pm 0.006$.

³ALBRECHT 89G reports < 0.0017 assuming the $\tau(4S)$ decays 45% to $B^{0}\bar{B}^{0}$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K_{3}^{*}(1780)^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{499} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 39</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 NISHIDA</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;5500</td><td>90</td><td>3 ALBRECHT</td><td>89G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

²Uses $B(K_{3}^{*}(1780) \rightarrow \gamma K) = 0.11^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$.

³ALBRECHT 89G reports < 0.005 assuming the $\tau(4S)$ decays 45% to $B^{0}\bar{B}^{0}$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K_{4}^{*}(2045)^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{500} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.0099</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>89G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALBRECHT 89G reports < 0.0090 assuming the $\tau(4S)$ decays 45% to $B^{0}\bar{B}^{0}$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^{+} \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{501} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.98 &plusmn; 0.25 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tr><td>1.20 &plusmn; 0.42 &plusmn; 0.20</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BH BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.87 &plusmn; 0.29 &plusmn; 0.09</td><td>1 TANIGUCHI</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.10 &plusmn; 0.37 &plusmn; 0.09</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07L BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BH</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.55 &plusmn; 0.42 &plusmn; 0.09</td><td>1 MOHAPATRA</td><td>06 BELL</td><td>Repl. by TANIGUCHI 08</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.36 &plusmn; 0.08</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05 BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07L</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>0.9 &plusmn; 0.6 &plusmn; 0.1</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 2.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 MOHAPATRA</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 2.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04C BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;13</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 COAN</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at $\tau(4S)$.

²No evidence for a nonresonant $K\pi\gamma$ contamination was seen; the central value assumes no contamination.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+} \pi^{0}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{502} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.31 &plusmn; 0.26 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5.10 &plusmn; 0.29 &plusmn; 0.27</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>24 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.86 &plusmn; 0.26 &plusmn; 0.38</td><td>1 DUH</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>5.02 &plusmn; 0.46 &plusmn; 0.29</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07BC BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.6 &plusmn; 1.8 &plusmn; 0.6<br>-1.6 &plusmn; 0.7</td><td>1 BORNHEIM</td><td>03 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.5 &plusmn; 0.4 &plusmn; 0.4</td><td>1 LIN</td><td>07A BELL</td><td>Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr><tr><td>5.8 &plusmn; 0.6 &plusmn; 0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05L BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07BC</td></tr><tr><td>5.0 &plusmn; 1.2 &plusmn; 0.5</td><td>1 CHAO</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIN 07A</td></tr><tr><td>5.5 &plusmn; 1.0 &plusmn; 0.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03L BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05L</td></tr><tr><td>7.4 &plusmn; 2.3 &plusmn; 0.9</td><td>1 CASEY</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHAO 04</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 13.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>01H BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 9.6</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01E BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 12.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 CRONIN-HEN..00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 20</td><td>90</td><td>GODANG</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by CRONIN-HENNESSY 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 17</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by GODANG 98</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 240</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2300</td><td>90</td><td>2 BEBEK</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{+}$ and $B^{0}$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

²BEBEK 87 assume the $\tau(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^{0}\bar{B}^{0}$.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+} \pi^{0}) / \Gamma(K^{0} \pi^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{502} / \Gamma_{370} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.285 &plusmn; 0.02 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td></td><td>LIN</td><td>07A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{-}) / \Gamma(K^{+} K^{-} K^{+}) \qquad \Gamma_{503} / \Gamma_{451} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.488 &plusmn; 0.005 &plusmn; 0.009</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20AJ LHCB</td><td>p p at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{-}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{503} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>15.2 &plusmn; 0.6 &plusmn; 1.3<br>-1.2</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>16.2 &plusmn; 1.2 &plusmn; 0.9</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>05G BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09L</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>10.9 &plusmn; 3.3 &plusmn; 1.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03M BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05G</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;130</td><td>90</td><td>2 ADAM</td><td>96D DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;220</td><td>90</td><td>3 ABREU</td><td>95N DLPH</td><td>Sup. by ADAM 96D</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;450</td><td>90</td><td>4 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;190</td><td>90</td><td>5 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>4 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^{0}$ and $B^{+}$ at the $\tau(4S)$; charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.

²ADAM 96D assumes $f_{B^{0}} = f_{B^{-}} = 0.39$ and $f_{B^{S}} = 0.12$.
# Meson Particle Listings

B$^{±}$

³Assumes a $B^0$, $B^-$ production fraction of 0.39 and a $B_S$ production fraction of 0.12.

⁴ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of $B^0\bar{B}^0$ and $B^+\bar{B}^-$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁵BORTOLETTO 89 reports $< 1.7 \times 10^{-4}$ assuming the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(\rho^0\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{504}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>8.3±1.2 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>8.1±0.7<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.6</sub></td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>8.0<sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-2.0</sub>±0.7</td><td>1</td><td>GORDON</td><td>02</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>10.4<sup>+3.3</sup><sub>-3.4</sub>±2.1</td><td>1</td><td>JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>8.8±1.0<sup>+0.6</sup><sub>-0.9</sub></td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05G</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09L</td></tr><tr><td>9.5±1.1±0.9</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04Z</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 05G</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 83</td><td>90</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;160</td><td>90</td><td>3 ADAM</td><td>96D</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 43</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;260</td><td>90</td><td>4 ABREU</td><td>95N</td><td>DLPH Sup. by ADAM 96D</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;150</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;170</td><td>90</td><td>5 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;230</td><td>90</td><td>5 BEBEK</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;600</td><td>90</td><td>GILES</td><td>84</td><td>CLEO Repl. by BEBEK 87</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²ABE 00c assumes $B(Z \to b\bar{b})=(21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the $B$ fractions $f_{B^0}=f_{B^+}=(39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B^-}=(10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

³ADAM 96d assumes $f_{B^0} = f_{B^-} = 0.39$ and $f_{B_S} = 0.12$.

⁴Assumes a $B^0$, $B^-$ production fraction of 0.39 and a $B_S$ production fraction of 0.12.

⁵Papers assume the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \frac{[\Gamma(K^*(892)^0\pi^+) + \Gamma(\rho^0\pi^+)]}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad (\Gamma_{396} + \Gamma_{504})/\Gamma \\ \frac{170 + \frac{120}{80} \pm 20}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

¹ADAM 96d assumes $f_{B^0} = f_{B^-} = 0.39$ and $f_{B_S} = 0.12$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\pi^+ f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi^+ \pi^-)}{\Gamma_{505}/\Gamma} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>&lt; 1.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09L</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 3.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>05G</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09L</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;140</td><td>90</td><td>2 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²BORTOLETTO 89 reports $< 1.2 \times 10^{-4}$ assuming the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\pi^+ f_2(1270))}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \Gamma_{506}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr></table>

## 2.2 $^{+0.7}_{-0.4}$ OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>17.0 ± 2.4 ± 2.1</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AL</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.60 ± 0.67 ± 0.02</td><td>2,3</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>4.09 ± 1.28<sup>+0.05</sup><sub>-0.14</sub></td><td>3,4</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05G</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09L</td></tr></table>

¹AAIJ 19AL reports $0.075 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.007$ fit fraction for $B^+ \to f_2(1270)\pi^+$ from the amplitude analysis of $B^\pm \to \pi^+K^+K^-$ decays. We use the PDG 19 value $B(B^+ \to K^+K^+\pi^+) = (5.2 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-6}$ to obtain $B(B^+ \to f_2(1270)\pi^+, f_2(1270) \to K^+K^-)$. We compute $B(B^+ \to f_2(1270)\pi^+) \text{ using } 1/2 \text{ of PDG 19 value of } B(f_2(1270) \to K\bar{K}) = (4.6^{+0.5}_{-0.4})\%$ for $K^+K^-$ fraction. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.

²AUBERT 09L reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \pi^+ f_2(1270))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(f_2(1270) \to \pi^+\pi^-)] = (0.9 \pm 0.2 \pm 0.1^{+0.3}_{-0.1}) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(f_2(1270) \to \pi^+\pi^-) = (56.2^{+1.9}_{-0.6}) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

⁴AUBERT,B 05G reports $[\Gamma(B^+ \to \pi^+ f_2(1270))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(f_2(1270) \to \pi^+\pi^-)] = (2.3 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-6}$ which we divide by our best value $B(f_2(1270) \to \pi^+\pi^-) = (56.2^{+1.9}_{-0.6}) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵BORTOLETTO 89 reports $< 2.1 \times 10^{-4}$ assuming the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\rho(1450)^0\pi^+, \rho^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>1.4±0.4<sup>+0.5</sup><sub>-0.8</sub></td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;2.3</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05G</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09L</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(f_0(1370)\pi^+, f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>&lt;4.0</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;3.0</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05G</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09L</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(f_0(1370)\pi^+, f_0 \to \pi^0\pi^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE</td><td>CL%</td><td>&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>LAI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(f_0(500)\pi^+, f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>&lt;4.1</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>5.3±0.7<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-0.8</sub></td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09L</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 4.6</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT,B</td><td>05G</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09L</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;41</td><td>90</td><td>BERGFELD</td><td>96B</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\pi^+\pi^0\pi^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>1.90±0.15±0.14</td><td>LAI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;89</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of $B^0\bar{B}^0$ and $B^+\bar{B}^-$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\rho^+\pi^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>1.06<sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.13</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td>1</td><td>LAI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

## 1.06$^{+0.12}_{-0.13}$ OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>1.12±0.11<sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.18</sub></td><td>1</td><td>LAI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.02±0.14±0.09</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07X</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.32±0.23<sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.19</sub></td><td>2</td><td>ZHANG</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL Repl. by LAI 23</td></tr><tr><td>1.09±0.19±0.19</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>04Z</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07X</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 4.3</td><td>90</td><td>2,3 JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 7.7</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;55</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹The second uncertainty includes both systematics ($\pm(0.09) \times 10^{-5}$) and possible interference with $B^+ \to \rho(1450)^+\pi^0$ ($\pm(0.08) \times 10^{-5}$).

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³Assumes no nonresonant contributions of $B^+ \to \pi^+\pi^0\pi^0$.

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\rho(1450)^+\pi^0, \rho^+ \to \pi^+\pi^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>1.2±0.6±0.2</td><td>LAI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\pi^+\pi^0\pi^0\pi^0\pi^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE</td><td>CL%</td><td>&lt;6 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>LAI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(X\pi^+, X \to \pi^0\pi^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>6.9±0.9±0.6</td><td>LAI</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

$$ \frac{\Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \qquad \frac{\text{DOCUMENT ID}}{\text{TECN}} \qquad \text{COMMENT} $$

<table><tr><td>VALUE</td><td>CL%</td><td>&lt;4.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of $B^0\bar{B}^0$ and $B^+\bar{B}^-$ at $\Upsilon(4S)$.
Γ(ρ⁺ρ⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>519</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>24.0±1.9 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>23.7±1.4±1.4</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>31.7±7.1<sup>+3.8</sup><sub>-6.7</sub></td><td></td><td>1,2 ZHANG</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>16.8±2.2±2.3</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06G</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09G</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>22.5<sup>+5.7</sup><sub>-5.4</sub>±5.8</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03V</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 06G</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 1000</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²The systematic error includes the error associated with the helicity-mix uncertainty.

Γ(ρ⁺f₀(980), f₀ → π⁺π⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>520</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;2.0</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09G</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;1.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06G</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09G</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(a₁(1260)⁺π⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>521</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>26.4±5.4±4.1</strong></td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>07BL</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;1700</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Assumes a₁⁺ decays only to 3π and B(a₁⁺ → π⁺π⁻π⁺) = 0.5.

Γ(a₁(1260)⁰π⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>522</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>20.4±4.7±3.4</strong></td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>07BL</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;900</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Assumes a₁⁺ decays only to 3π and B(a₁⁺ → π⁺π⁻π⁺) = 1.0.

Γ(ωπ⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>523</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>6.9±0.5 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6.7±0.5±0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AE</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>6.9±0.6±0.5</td><td>1 JEN</td><td>06</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>11.3<sup>+3.3</sup><sub>-2.9</sub>±1.4</td><td>1 JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>6.1±0.7±0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AE</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>5.5±0.9±0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04H</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 06E</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>5.7<sup>+1.4</sup><sub>-1.3</sub>±0.6</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>04A</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by JEN 06</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>4.2<sup>+2.0</sup><sub>-1.8</sub></td><td>1 LU</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by WANG 04A</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>6.6<sup>+2.1</sup><sub>-1.8</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01G</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 04H</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 23</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;400</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(ωπ⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>524</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>15.9±1.6±1.4</strong></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>10.6±2.1<sup>+1.6</sup><sub>-1.0</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06T</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09H</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>12.6<sup>+3.7</sup><sub>-3.3</sub>±1.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05O</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 06T</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;61</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(ηπ⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>525</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>4.02±0.27 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.07±0.26±0.21</td><td>1 HOI</td><td>12</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.00±0.40±0.24</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.2<sup>+2.8</sup><sub>-1.2</sub></td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>5.0±0.5±0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AE</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>4.2±0.4±0.2</td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>07B</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by HOI 12</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>5.1±0.6±0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>05K</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AE</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>4.8±0.7±0.3</td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHANG 07B</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>5.3±1.0±0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04H</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 05K</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 15</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(ηρ⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>526</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>7.0±2.9 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.8.</td></tr><tr><td>9.9±1.2±0.8</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AH</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.1<sup>+1.4</sup><sub>-1.3</sub>±0.4</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>07B</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>8.4±1.9±1.1</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>05K</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AH</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;14</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04D</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 05K</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;15</td><td>90</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;32</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(η'ρ⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>527</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2.7 ±0.9 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.9.</td></tr><tr><td>3.5 ±0.6 ±0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AV</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.76<sup>+0.67</sup><sub>-0.62</sub>±0.14</td><td>1 SCHUEMANN</td><td>06</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>3.9 ±0.7 ±0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AE</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>4.0 ±0.8 ±0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>05K</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07AE</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 4.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04H</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 05K</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 7.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01M</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;12</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01G</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;12</td><td>90</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;31</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(η'ρ⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>528</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>9.7<sup>+1.9</sup><sub>-1.8</sub>±1.1</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10A BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>8.7<sup>+3.1</sup><sub>-2.8</sub>±1.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10A</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 5.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 SCHUEMANN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;22</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04D</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07E</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;33</td><td>90</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;47</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(φπ⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>529</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>3.2±1.5±0.3</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ 19AL HLCB pp at T, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt; 15</td><td>90</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>14A</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 19AL</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 33</td><td>90</td><td>3 KIM</td><td>12A</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 24</td><td>90</td><td>3 AUBERT,B</td><td>06C</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 41</td><td>90</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>04A</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 06C</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt; 140</td><td>90</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>01D</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;15300</td><td>90</td><td>4 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1 AAIJ 19AL reports (0.3±0.1±0.1)×10<sup>-2</sup> fit fraction for B<sup>+</sup> → φ(1020)π<sup>+</sup> from the amplitude analysis of B<sup>±</sup> → π<sup>±</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>−</sup> decays. We use the PDG 19 value B(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>−</sup>π<sup>+</sup>) = (5.2±0.4) × 10<sup>-6</sup> to obtain B(B<sup>+</sup> → φ(1020)π<sup>+</sup>, φ(1020) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>−</sup>). We compute B(B<sup>+</sup> → φ(1020)π<sup>+</sup>) using the PDG 19 value of B(φ(1020) → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>−</sup>) = (49.2±0.5)%. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2 Measures B(B<sup>+</sup> → φπ<sup>+</sup>)/B(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>) &lt; 0.018 at 90% C.L. and assumes B(B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>) = (8.8<sup>+0.7</sup><sub>-0.6</sub> × 10<sup>-6</sup>).</td></tr></table>

³Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><tr><td>4 ABE 00C assumes B(Z → b̄b) = (21.7 ± 0.1)% and the B fractions f<sub>B0</sub>=f<sub>B+</sub> = (39.7<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-2.2</sub>)% and f<sub>B<sub>5</sub></sub> = (10.5<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-2.2</sub>)%.</td></tr></table>

Γ(φρ⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>530</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt; 3.0</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BK</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;16</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(a₀(980)⁰π⁺, a₀⁺ → ηπ⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>531</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;5.8</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>04</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of charged and neutral B mesons from T(4S) decays.

Γ(a₀(980)⁰π⁺, a₀⁺ → ηπ⁰)/Γ<sub>total</sub> Γ<sub>532</sub>/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;1.4</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08A</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).