⁷ ABULENCIA, A 06D obtains this from $Γ(K^+K^-)/Γ(K^+π^-) < 0.10$ at 90% CL, assuming $B(B^0 → K^+π^-) = (18.9 ± 0.7) × 10^{-6}$.

⁸ ABE 00c assumes $B(Z → bbar) = (21.7 ± 0.1)%$ and the B fractions $f_{B^0} = f_{B^+} = (39.7 ± 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B_S} = (10.5 ± 1.8)\%$.

⁹ ADAM 96d assumes $f_{B^0} = f_{B^-} = 0.39$ and $f_{B_S} = 0.12$. Contributions from $B^0$ and $B_S$ decays cannot be separated. Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.

¹⁰ BUSKULIC 96V assumes PDG 96 production fractions for $B^0$, $B^+$, $B_S$, baryons.

¹¹ Assumes a $B^0$, $B^-$ production fraction of 0.39 and a $B_S$ production fraction of 0.12. Contributions from $B^0$ and $B_S^0$ decays cannot be separated. Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>R<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>355</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>1.21 ± 0.16 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.26 ± 0.19 ± 0.05</td><td></td><td>1 DUH</td><td>13</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.08 ± 0.28 ± 0.11</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06c</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.87<sup>+0.25</sup><sub>-0.20</sub> ± 0.09</td><td>1 LIN</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr><tr><td>0.8 ± 0.3 ± 0.9</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>05G</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by LIN 07</td></tr><tr><td>1.19<sup>+0.40</sup><sub>-0.35</sub> ± 0.13</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>05e</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT,BE 06c</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04M</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHAO</td><td>04</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by ABE 05G</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 3.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 BORNHEIM</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 4.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 CASEY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;17</td><td>90</td><td>GODANG</td><td>08</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>R<sup>0</sup>)/Γ(K<sup>0</sup>φ)</th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>355</sub>/Γ<sub>364</sub></th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.17 ± 0.08 ± 0.02</td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20F</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Observed signal with a significance of 3.5 $\sigma$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>356</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>6.7 ± 0.5 OUR FIT</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>7.0 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>7.2 ± 0.7 ± 0.3</td><td></td><td>1 LAI</td><td>19</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>6.4 ± 1.0 ± 0.6</td><td></td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10E</td><td>04E</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;18</td><td>90</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>04</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;21</td><td>90</td><td>1 ECKHART</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K*(892)±K∓)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>357</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>14BMLHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)/Γ(K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>356</sub>/Γ<sub>322</sub></th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.134 ± 0.011 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BP</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.123 ± 0.009 ± 0.015</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BP</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.128 ± 0.017 ± 0.009 AAIJ 13BP LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 17BP

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">[Γ(R<sup>*0</sup>K<sup>0</sup>) + Γ(K<sup>*0</sup>R<sup>0</sup>)]/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>358</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.96</td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.9</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT,BE</td><td>06N</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes $B(B^0 → K^0π^+π^-) = (4.96 ± 0.20) × 10^{-5}$.

² Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>359</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.17 ± 0.60 ± 0.24</td><td></td><td>1 GAUR</td><td>13</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;19</td><td>90</td><td>1 ECKHART</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>S K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>360</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.9 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AD</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>S K<sup>0</sup>η̄)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>361</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AD</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>S K<sup>0</sup>η̄)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>362</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AD</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>363</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead></table>

26.8 ± 1.1 OUR FIT

26.6 ± 1.2 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>26.5 ± 0.9 ± 0.8</td><td>1.2 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>28.3 ± 3.3 ± 4.0</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>04</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>23.8 ± 2.0 ± 1.6</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04V</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 120</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1300</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91E</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

² All intermediate charmonium and charm resonances are removed, except of $χ_{c0}$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)/Γ(K<sup>0</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)</th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>363</sub>/Γ<sub>322</sub></th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.539 ± 0.025 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BP</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

0.549 ± 0.018 ± 0.033

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.385 ± 0.031 ± 0.023 AAIJ 13BP LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 17BP

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>φ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>364</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead></table>

7.3 ± 0.7 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>7.1 ± 0.6 <sup>+0.4</sup><sub>-0.3</sub></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>9.0 <sup>+2.2</sup><sub>-1.8</sub> ± 0.7</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>8.4 <sup>+1.5</sup><sub>-1.3</sub> ± 0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04A</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 120</td></tr><tr><td>8.1 <sup>+3.1</sup><sub>-2.5</sub> ± 0.8</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01D</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 12.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 BRIERE</td><td>01</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 31</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 88</td><td>90</td><td>1 ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 720</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>91B</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 420</td><td>90</td><td>2 AVERY</td><td>89B</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1000</td><td>90</td><td>3 AVERY</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

² AVERY 89b reports $< 4.9 × 10^{-4}$ assuming the $Υ(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

³ AVERY 87 reports $< 1.3 × 10^{-3}$ assuming the $Υ(4S)$ decays 40% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(f<sub>0</sub>(980)K<sup>0</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>365</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.0 <sup>+2.6</sup><sub>-1.8</sub> ± 2.4</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(f<sub>0</sub>(1500)K<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>366</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>13.3 <sup>+5.8</sup><sub>-4.4</sub> ± 3.2</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(f'<sub>2</sub>(1525)K<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>367</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.29 <sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.18</sub> ± 0.36</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(f<sub>0</sub>(1710)K<sup>0</sup>, f<sub>0</sub> → K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>368</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.4 ± 0.7 ± 0.5</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>K<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>nonresonant)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>369</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>33 ± 5 ± 9</td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>120</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Γ(K<sup>0</sup>S K<sup>0</sup>S K<sup>0</sup>S)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th colspan="4">Γ<sub>370</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th><th></th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>6.0 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr><tr><td>6.19 ± 0.48 ± 0.19</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>121</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.2 <sup>+1.6</sup><sub>-1.3</sub> ± 0.8</td><td>1 GARMASH</td><td>04</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>6.9 <sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-0.8</sub> ± 0.6</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>05</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 121</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $Υ(4S)$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

$$ \Gamma(f_0(980)K^0, f_0 \to K_S^0 K_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{371}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.7<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.2</sub>±1.3</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12l</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K_S^0 K_S^0 K_S^0 decay.

$$ \Gamma(f_0(1710)K^0, f_0 \to K_S^0 K_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{372}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.50<sup>+0.46</sup><sub>-0.24</sub>±0.11</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12l</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K_S^0 K_S^0 K_S^0 decay.

$$ \Gamma(f_2(2010)K^0, f_2 \to K_S^0 K_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{373}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.54<sup>+0.21</sup><sub>-0.20</sub>±0.52</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12l</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K_S^0 K_S^0 K_S^0 decay.

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K_S^0 K_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{nonresonant}} \quad \Gamma_{374}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>13.3<sup>+2.2</sup><sub>-2.3</sub>±2.2</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>12l</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B⁰ → K_S^0 K_S^0 K_S^0 decay.

$$ \Gamma(K_S^0 K_S^0 K_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{375}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;16</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06R</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K^+ K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{376}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>27.5<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-2.2</sub>±2.2</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AS</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;610</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91E</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{377}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>10.0±0.5 OUR FIT</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>10.0±0.5 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>10.4±0.5±0.6</td><td>1 PRIM</td><td>13</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>9.7±0.5±0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BG</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>11.5<sup>+4.5</sup><sub>-3.7</sub>±1.9</td><td>1 BRIERE</td><td>01</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.2±0.7±0.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07D</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>9.2±0.9±0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>04W</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07D</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>11.2±1.3±0.8</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03V</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, B 04W</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>10.0<sup>+1.6</sup><sub>-1.5</sub>±0.8</td><td>1 CHEN</td><td>03B</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by PRIM 13</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8.7<sup>+2.5</sup><sub>-2.1</sub>±1.1</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01D</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 03V</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;384</td><td>90</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 21</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 43</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;320</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;380</td><td>90</td><td>3 AVERY</td><td>89B</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;380</td><td>90</td><td>4 AVERY</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² ABE 00c assumes B(Z → bB̄)=(21.7 ± 0.1)% and the B fractions fB⁰=fB⁺=(39.7<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-2.2</sub>)% and fB⁻=(10.5<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-2.2</sub>)%.

³ AVERY 89b reports < 4.4 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(4S) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

⁴ AVERY 87 reports < 4.7 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(4S) decays 40% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \text{nonresonant})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{378}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;71.7</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 CHIANG</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in the range 0.7< mKπ < 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full Kπ mass range.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K^- \pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{379}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.5 ±1.3</td><td colspan="3">OUR AVERAGE</td></tr><tr><td>2.11<sup>+5.63</sup><sub>-5.26</sub> ±4.85</td><td>1,2 CHIANG</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.6 ±1.1 ±0.8</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07AS</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Measured in the range 0.7< mKπ < 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full Kπ mass range. The quoted result is equivalent to the upper limit of < 13.9 × 10⁻⁶ at 90% CL.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \bar{K}^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{380}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.83±0.24 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr></tbody></table>

Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.85±0.07±0.20</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19L</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.26<sup>+0.33</sup><sub>-0.29</sub>±0.10</td><td>2,3 CHIANG</td><td>10</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.28<sup>+0.35</sup><sub>-0.30</sub>±0.11</td><td>3 AUBERT</td><td>08l</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;22</td><td>90</td><td>4 GODANG</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;469</td><td>90</td><td>5 ABE</td><td>00c</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ AAIJ 19L reports [Γ(B⁰ → K̄*(892)⁰ K*(892)⁰)] = 0.0758 ± 0.0057 ± 0.0030 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰ → K̄*(892)⁰ K*(892)⁰) = (1.11 ± 0.27) × 10⁻⁵. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

² Measured in the range 0.7< mKπ < 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full Kπ mass range. The quoted result is equivalent to the upper limit of < 0.8 × 10⁻⁶ at 90% CL.

³ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

⁴ Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 1.9 × 10⁻⁵.

⁵ ABE 00c assumes B(Z → bB̄)=(21.7 ± 0.1)% and the B fractions fB⁰=fB⁺=(39.7<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-2.2</sub>)% and fB⁻=(10.5<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-2.2</sub>)%.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.83±0.24 (Error scaled by 1.5)

<figure><img src="image_603.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \bar{K}^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad (\text{units } 10^{-6}) $$

$$ \Gamma(K^{+}K^{-} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \text{nonresonant})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{381}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHIANG</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K^+ \pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{382}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AS</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;7.6</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHIANG</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 K^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{383}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 0.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHIANG</td><td>10</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 0.41</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08l</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;37</td><td>90</td><td>2 GODANG</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 2.9 × 10⁻⁵.

$$ \Gamma(K^*(892)^+ K^*(892)^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{384}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 2.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AP</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;141</td><td>90</td><td>2 GODANG</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 8.9 × 10⁻⁵.
<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sub>1</sub>(1400)<sup>0</sup>φ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>385</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(φ(Kπ)<sup>*0</sup>)<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>386</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.3 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.3 ± 0.6 ± 0.4</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 PRIM<br>1 AUBERT</td><td>13 BELL<br>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)<br>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>• • •</td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>5.0 ± 0.8 ± 0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(φ(Kπ)<sup>*0</sup> 0.60&lt;m<sub>Kπ</sub> &lt;2.15))</th><th>Γ<sub>387</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;31.8</td><td>90</td><td>1.2 CHIANG</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07A0 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sub>0</sub><sup>*0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>388</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;31.8</td><td>90</td><td>1.2 CHIANG</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1 Measured in the range 0.7 &lt; m<sub>Kπ</sub> &lt; 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full Kπ mass range.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).</td></tr><tr><td>Γ(K<sub>0</sub><sup>*0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>Γ<sub>389</sub>/Γ</td></tr><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.3</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 CHIANG</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1 Measured in the range 0.7 &lt; m<sub>Kπ</sub> &lt; 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full Kπ mass range.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).</td></tr><tr><td>Γ(K<sub>0</sub><sup>*0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>Γ<sub>390</sub>/Γ</td></tr><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;8.4</td><td>90</td><td>1.2 CHIANG</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1 Measured in the range 0.7 &lt; m<sub>Kπ</sub> &lt; 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full Kπ mass range.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).</td></tr><tr><td>Γ(K<sub>0</sub><sup>*0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>φ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>Γ<sub>391</sub>/Γ</td></tr><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>3.9 ± 0.5 ± 0.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>• • •</td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>4.6 ± 0.7 ± 0.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>2 AUBERT, B</td><td>04W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07D</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² Observed 181 ± 17 events with statistical significance greater than 10 σ.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sub>0</sub><sup>*0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>392</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHIANG</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).</td></tr><tr><td>Γ(K<sub>0</sub><sup>*0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>Γ<sub>393</sub>/Γ</td></tr><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHIANG</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).</td></tr><tr><td>Γ(K<sup>*0</sup>(1680)<sup>0</sup>φ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>Γ<sub>394</sub>/Γ</td></tr><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07A0 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).</td></tr><tr><td>Γ(K<sup>*0</sup>(1780)<sup>0</sup>φ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>Γ<sub>395</sub>/Γ</td></tr><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07A0 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).</td></tr><tr><td>Γ(K<sup>*0</sup>(2045)<sup>0</sup>φ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>Γ<sub>396</sub>/Γ</td></tr><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;15.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07A0 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).</td></tr><tr><td>Γ(K<sub>2</sub><sup>*0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>ρ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></td><td>Γ<sub>397</sub>/Γ</td></tr><tr><td>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sub>2</sub><sup>*0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup>φ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>398</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.8 ± 0.9 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.5 ± 0.9 ± 1.0</td><td>1 PRIM</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>7.5 ± 0.9 ± 0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>7.8 ± 1.1 ± 0.6</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BG</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>2 AUBERT, B</td><td>04W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07D</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1400</td><td>90</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>91B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² The angular distribution of B → φK*(1430) provides evidence with statistical significance of 3.2 σ.

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sup>0</sup>φφ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>399</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.7 ± 0.7 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.3.</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.02<sup>+0.75</sup><sub>-0.66</sub> ± 0.20</td><td>1 MOHANTY</td><td>21 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>4.5 ± 0.8 ± 0.3</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>11A BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.1 <sup>+1.7</sup><sub>-1.4</sub> ± 0.4</td><td>1 AUBERT, BE</td><td>06H BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 11A</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(η'K'K)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>400</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;31</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06P BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(ηK<sup>0</sup>γ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>401</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.6 ± 1.8 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>7.1 <sup>+2.1</sup><sub>-2.0</sub> ± 0.4</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>09 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>8.7 <sup>+3.1</sup><sub>-2.7</sub> ± 1.9</td><td>2,3 NISHIDA</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>11.3 <sup>+2.8</sup><sub>-1.6</sub> ± 0.6</td><td>1,2 AUBERT, B</td><td>06M BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ m<sub>ηK</sub> < 3.25 GeV/c².

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³ m<sub>η'K</sub> < 2.4 GeV/c².

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(η'K<sup>0</sup>γ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>402</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.4</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 WEDD</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>• • •</td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;6.6</td><td>90</td><td>1,3 AUBERT, B</td><td>06M BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² m<sub>η'K</sub> < 3.4 GeV/c².

³ m<sub>η'K</sub> < 3.25 GeV/c².

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sup>0</sup>φγ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>403</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.74 ± 0.60 ± 0.32</td><td>1 SAHOO</td><td>11A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>• • •</td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07Q BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;8.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 DRUTSKOY</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at T(4S).

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>γ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>404</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>(4.6 <sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.2</sub> ± 0.5)</td><td>1,2 NISHIDA</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² 2.125 GeV/c² < M<sub>Kπ</sub> < 1.6 GeV/c².

<table><thead><tr><th>Γ(K<sup>*0</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup>γ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></th><th>Γ<sub>405</sub>/Γ</th></tr><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>41.8 ± 2.5 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.1.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>39.6 ± 0.7 ± 1.4</td><td>1 HORIZUGHI</td><td>17 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>44.7 ± 1.0 ± 1.6</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>09A0 BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>45.5 <sup>+7.2</sup><sub>-6.8</sub> ± 3.4</td><td>3 COAN</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>• • •</td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>39.2 ± 2.0 ± 2.4</td><td>4 AUBERT, BE</td><td>04A BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09A0</td></tr><tr><td>40.1 ± 2.1 ± 1.7</td><td>5 NAKAO</td><td>04 BELL</td><td>Repl. by HORIZUGHI 17</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 110</td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>02G CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>42.3 ± 4.0 ± 2.2</td><td>5 AUBERT</td><td>02C BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, BE 04A</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 210</td><td>6 ADAM</td><td>96D DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>40 ± 17 ± 8</td><td>7 AMMAR</td><td>93 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by COAN 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 420</td><td>ALBRECHT</td><td>89G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 240</td><td>8 AVERY</td><td>89B CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2100</td><td>8 AVERY</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

¹ Uses B(T(4S) → B⁺B⁻) = (51.4 ± 0.6)% and B(T(4S) → B⁰B⁰) = (48.6 ± 0.6)%.

² Uses B(T(4S) → B⁺B⁻) = (51.6 ± 0.6)% and B(T(4S) → B⁰B⁰) = (48.4 ± 0.6)%.

³ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S). No evidence for a nonresonant Kπγ contamination was seen; the central value assumes no contamination.

⁴ Uses the production ratio of charged and neutral B from T(4S) decays R⁺/₀ = 1.006 ± 0.048.

⁵ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

⁶ ADAM 96d assumes $f_{B^0} = 0.39$ and $f_{B_s} = 0.12$.

⁷ AMMAR 93 observed 6.6 ± 2.8 events above background.

⁸ AVERY 89b reports < 2.8 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(4S) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^*(1410)\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{406}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.3 \times 10^{-4} & 90 & 1 \text{ NISHIDA} & 02 & \text{BELL} \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^+\pi^-\gamma)_{\text{nonresonant}}/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{407}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <2.6 \times 10^{-6} & 90 & 1,2 \text{ NISHIDA} & 02 & \text{BELL} \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² 1.25 GeV/c² < $M_{K_\pi} < 1.6$ GeV/c²

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^*(892)^0 X(214), X \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{408}/\Gamma} & & & \\ X(214) \text{ is a hypothetical particle of mass 214 MeV/c}^2 \text{ reported by the HyperCP experiment (PARK 05)} \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-8}) & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <2.26 & 90 & 1,2 \text{ HYUN} & 10 & \text{BELL} \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² Based on scalar nature of X particle. With a vector X assumption, the upper limit is 2.27 × 10⁻⁶.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^0\pi^+\pi^-\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{409}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

### 1.99±0.18 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>2.05±0.20<sup>+0.26</sup><sub>-0.22</sub></td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..16</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.85±0.21±0.12</td><td>1,3 AUBERT</td><td>07R</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.40±0.4±0.3</td><td>3,4 YANG</td><td>05</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

² Uses B(T(4S) → B⁺B⁻) = 0.513 ± 0.006.

³ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

⁴ $M_{K\pi\pi} < 2.0$ GeV/c².

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^+\pi^-\pi^0\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{410}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} 4.07 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.31 & 1,2 \text{ AUBERT} & 07R & \text{BABR} & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

¹ $M_{K\pi\pi} < 1.8$ GeV/c².

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K_1(1270)^0\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{411}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <5.8 & 90 & 1 \text{ YANG} & 05 & \text{BELL} \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.2 & 90 & 1 \text{ YANG} & 05 & \text{BELL} \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;700</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>89G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² ALBRECHT 89g reports < 0.0078 assuming the T(4S) decays 45% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K_1(1400)^0\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{412}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.2 & 90 & 1 \text{ YANG} & 05 & \text{BELL} \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.2 & 90 & 1 \text{ YANG} & 05 & \text{BELL} \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;430</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>89G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² ALBRECHT 89g reports < 0.0048 assuming the T(4S) decays 45% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K_2^*(1430)^0\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{413}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ 1.24±0.24 OUR AVERAGE & 1 AUBERT,B & 04U & \text{BABR} & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \\ 1.3 ± 0.5 ± 0.1 & 1 NISHIDA & 02 & \text{BELL} & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.0 \times 10^{-7} & 90 & 1 KING & 16 & \text{BELL} \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

<table><tr><td>1.22±0.25±0.10</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04U</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.3 ± 0.5 ± 0.1</td><td>1 NISHIDA</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;40</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>89G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² ALBRECHT 89g reports < 4.4 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(4S) decays 45% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K^*(1680)^0\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{414}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <0.0020 & 90 & 1 ALBRECHT & 89G ARG & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

¹ ALBRECHT 89g reports < 0.0022 assuming the T(4S) decays 45% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K_3^*(1780)^0\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{415}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <83 & 90 & 1,2 NISHIDA & 05 & \text{BELL} \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;10000</td><td>90</td><td>3 ALBRECHT</td><td>89G ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² Uses B(K₃(1780) → ηK) = 0.11 ± 0.05.

³ ALBRECHT 89g reports < 0.011 assuming the T(4S) decays 45% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(K_4^*(2045)^0\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{416}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <0.0043 & 90 & 1 ALBRECHT & 89G ARG & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

¹ ALBRECHT 89g reports < 0.0048 assuming the T(4S) decays 45% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(\rho^0\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{417}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

### 0.86±0.15 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>0.97<sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.22</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BH</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.78<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.16</sub></td><td>1 TANIGUCHI</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.79<sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.20</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07L</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BH</td></tr><tr><td>1.25<sup>+0.37</sup><sub>-0.33</sub></td><td>1 MOHAPATRA</td><td>06</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by TANIGUCHI 08</td></tr><tr><td>0.0 ± 0.2 ± 0.1</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07L</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 0.8</td><td>1 MOHAPATRA</td><td>05</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04C</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;17</td><td>1 COAN</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(\rho^0 X(214), X \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{418}/\Gamma} & & & \\ X(214) \text{ is a hypothetical particle of mass 214 MeV/c}^2 \text{ reported by the HyperCP experiment (PARK 05)} \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-8}) & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.73 & 90 & 1,2 HYUN & 10 & \text{BELL} \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

² The result is the same for a scalar or vector X particle.

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(\rho^0\gamma)/\Gamma(K^*(892)^0\gamma) & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{417}/\Gamma_{405}} & & & \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-2}) & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} & \\ 2.06<sup>+0.45</sup><sub>-0.43</sub> & 0.14 & & & \\ & & & & TANIGUCHI 08 & BELL \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(\omega\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{419}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \end{array} $$

### 0.44<sup>+0.18</sup><sub>-0.16</sub> OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>0.50<sup>+0.27</sup><sub>-0.23</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BH</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.40<sup>+0.19</sup><sub>-0.17</sub></td><td>1 TANIGUCHI</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>0.40<sup>+0.24</sup><sub>-0.20</sub></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07L</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BH</td></tr><tr><td>0.56<sup>+0.34</sup><sub>-0.27</sub></td><td>1 MOHAPATRA</td><td>06</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by TANIGUCHI 08</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.0</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07L</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.8</td><td>1 MOHAPATRA</td><td>05</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by MOHAPATRA 06</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.0</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04C</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;9.2</td><td>1 COAN</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(\phi\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{420}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <1.0 \times 10^{-7} & 90 & 1 KING & 16 & \text{BELL} \\ & & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;8.5 \times 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,BE</td><td>05C</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.3 \times 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 COAN</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

$$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \Gamma(f_2(1270)\gamma, f_2 \rightarrow (KS)^0(KS)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\Gamma_{421}/\Gamma} & & & \\ \text{VALUE} & \text{CL}\% & \text{DOCUMENT ID} & \text{TECN} & \text{COMMENT} \\ <3.1 \times 10^{-7} & 22 & & & e^+e^- \rightarrow \Gamma(4S) \end{array} $$
$$ \Gamma(f_2^0(1525)\gamma, f_2^0 \rightarrow (KS)^0(KS)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{422}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.1 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>JEON</td><td>22</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{423}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

5.37±0.20 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.3.

5.43±0.26 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below.

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.83±0.22±0.17</td><td>ADACHI</td><td>24</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>5.04±0.21±0.18</td><td>1 DUH</td><td>13</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>5.5 ± 0.4 ± 0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>4.5 ±1.4 ±0.5</td><td>1 BORNHEIM</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>-1.2 ±0.4</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.1 ± 0.2 ± 0.2</td><td>1 LIN</td><td>07A</td><td>BELL Repl. by DUH 13</td></tr><tr><td>4.4 ± 0.6 ± 0.3</td><td>1 CHAO</td><td>04</td><td>BELL Repl. by LIN 07A</td></tr><tr><td>4.7 ± 0.6 ± 0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>02Q</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07B</td></tr><tr><td>5.4 ± 1.2 ± 0.5</td><td>1 CASEY</td><td>02</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHAO 04</td></tr><tr><td>5.6 ±2.3 ±0.4</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>01H</td><td>BELL Repl. by CASEY 02</td></tr><tr><td>-2.0 ±0.5</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01E</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 02Q</td></tr><tr><td>4.1 ±1.0 ± 0.7</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 67</td><td>90</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.3 ±1.6</td><td>1 CRONIN-HEN</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by BORNHEIM 03</td></tr><tr><td>-1.4 ±0.5</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 15</td><td>90</td><td>GODANG</td><td>98 CLE2 Repl. by CRONIN-HENNESSY 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 45</td><td>90</td><td>3 ADAM</td><td>96D DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 20</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96 CLE2 Repl. by GODANG 98</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 41</td><td>90</td><td>4 BUSKULIC</td><td>96V ALEP e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 55</td><td>90</td><td>5 ABREU</td><td>95N DLPH Sup. by ADAM 96D</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 47</td><td>90</td><td>6 AKERS</td><td>94L OPAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 29</td><td>90</td><td>1 BATTLE</td><td>93 CLE2 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;130</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B ARG e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 77</td><td>90</td><td>7 BORTOLETTO</td><td>87 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;260</td><td>90</td><td>7 BEBEK</td><td>87 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;500</td><td>90</td><td>GILES</td><td>84 CLEO e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2 ABE 00C assumes $B(Z \rightarrow b\bar{b})=(21.7 \pm 0.1)\%$ and the $B$ fractions $f_{B^0}=f_{B^+}=(39.7 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $f_{B^0}=(10.5 \pm 1.8)\%$.

3 ADAM 96D assumes $f_{B^0} = f_{B^-} = 0.39$ and $f_{B^0} = 0.12$.

4 BUSKULIC 96V assumes PDG 96 production fractions for $B^0$, $B^+$, $B_s$, baryons.

5 Assumes a $B^0$, $B^-$ production fraction of 0.39 and a $B_s$ production fraction of 0.12.

6 Assumes $B(Z \rightarrow b\bar{b}) = 0.217$ and $B_d^0(B_s^0)$ fraction 39.5% (12%).

7 Paper assumes the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
5.43±0.26 (Error scaled by 1.4)

<figure><img src="image_604.png" /></figure>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} (\text{units } 10^{-6}) $$

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(K^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{423}/\Gamma_{288} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.268±0.010 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

0.261±0.015 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.262±0.009±0.017</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.259±0.017±0.016</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>11N CDF</td><td>p\bar{p} at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.21 ± 0.05 ± 0.03</td><td>ABULENCIA, A</td><td>06D CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 11N</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^0\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{424}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.55±0.17 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.38±0.27±0.22</td><td>ABUDINEN</td><td>23E BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.31±0.19±0.19</td><td>1 JULIUS</td><td>17 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.83±0.21±0.13</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>13D BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.47±0.25±0.12</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07BC BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13D</td></tr><tr><td>1.17±0.32±0.10</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05L BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07BC</td></tr><tr><td>2.3 ±0.4 ±0.2</td><td>1 CHAO</td><td>05 BELL</td><td>Repl. by JULIUS 17</td></tr><tr><td>-0.5 ±0.3</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 3.6</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03L BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>2.1 ±0.6 ±0.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03S BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05L</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 4.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 BORNHEIM</td><td>03 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.7 ±0.6 ±0.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 LEE</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>Repl. by CHAO 05</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 ASNER</td><td>02 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 6.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 CASEY</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 9.3</td><td>90</td><td>GODANG</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by ASNER 02</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 9.1</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by GODANG 98</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;60</td><td>90</td><td>2 ACCIARRI</td><td>95H L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2 ACCIARRI 95H assumes $f_{B^0} = 39.5 \pm 4.0$ and $f_{B_s} = 12.0 \pm 3.0\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\eta\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{425}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.41 ±0.17±0.05</td><td>1,2 PAL</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>-0.15 ±0.07</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 1.5</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08AH BABR e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.3</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>06W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AH</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.5</td><td>90</td><td>2 CHANG</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>Repl. by PAL 15</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.5</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT, B</td><td>04D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 06W</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.9</td><td>90</td><td>2 RICHICHI</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 8</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 250</td><td>90</td><td>3 ACCIARRI</td><td>95H L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1800</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 PAL 15 signal significance is 3.0 standard deviations. The measurement corresponds to 90% CL upper limit of $< 6.5 \times 10^{-7}$.

2 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

3 ACCIARRI 95H assumes $f_{B^0} = 39.5 \pm 4.0$ and $f_{B_s} = 12.0 \pm 3.0\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\eta\eta)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{426}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 1.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 1.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06V BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>05A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>04X BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 18</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;410</td><td>90</td><td>2 ACCIARRI</td><td>95H L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

2 ACCIARRI 95H assumes $f_{B^0} = 39.5 \pm 4.0$ and $f_{B_s} = 12.0 \pm 3.0\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\eta'\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{427}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.2±0.6 OUR AVERAGE

Error includes scale factor of 1.7.

0.9±0.4±0.1

2.8±1.0±0.3

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.8+0.8</td><td>0.6±0.1</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>06W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AH</td></tr><tr><td>1.0+1.4</td><td>-1.0±0.8</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>04D BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 06W</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;11</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\eta'\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{428}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 1.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AV BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 6.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 SCHUEMANN</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>06V BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;10</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>04X BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, B 06V</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;47</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\eta'\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{429}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 1.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08AH BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 4.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 SCHUEMANN</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>06W BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08AH</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 4.6</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT, B</td><td>04X BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;27</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

### Γ(η'ρ⁰)/Γtotal Γ430/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 SCHUEMANN 07</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.7</td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07E</td><td>BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10A</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04D</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07E</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;12</td><td>90</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;23</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(η'f₀(980), f₀ → π⁺π⁻)/Γtotal Γ431/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..10A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.5</td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07E</td><td>BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 10A</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(η⁰⁰)/Γtotal Γ432/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07Y</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>07B</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04D</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 07Y</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;10</td><td>90</td><td>1 RICHICHI</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;13</td><td>90</td><td>BEHRENS</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2 Repl. by RICHICHI 00</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(ηf₀(980), f₀ → π⁺π⁻)/Γtotal Γ433/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.4</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07Y</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ(ηω)/Γtotal Γ434/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.94<sup>+0.35</sup><sub>-0.30</sub> ±0.09</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AV</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>05K</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr><tr><td>4.0<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.2</sub> ±0.4</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04X</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 05K</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;12</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ(ηω')/Γtotal Γ435/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.01<sup>+0.46</sup><sub>-0.38</sub> ±0.09</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AV</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 SCHUEMANN 07</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04X</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;60</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(ρ⁰⁰)/Γtotal Γ436/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06T</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09H</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>05O</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 06T</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;11</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(ηf₀(980), f₀ → π⁺π⁻)/Γtotal Γ437/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09H</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06T</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09H</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">1 Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Γ(ηω)/Γtotal Γ438/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.2±0.3<sup>+0.3</sup><sub>-0.2</sub></td><td></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06T</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 14</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;19</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(φπ⁰)/Γtotal Γ439/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.15</td><td>90</td><td>1 KIM</td><td>12A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.28</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04D</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 06C</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(φη')/Γtotal Γ440/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AV</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.6</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06V</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04X</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 06V</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;9</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(φη')/Γtotal Γ441/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 SCHUEMANN 07</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AV</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06V</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 09AV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.5</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04X</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT,B 06V</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;31</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(φπ⁺π⁻)/Γtotal Γ442/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.82<sup>+0.25</sup><sub>-0.43</sub></td><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17A</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Signal evidence is 4.5 standard deviations.

### Γ(φρ⁰)/Γtotal Γ443/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.33</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BK</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;156</td><td>90</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;13</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

² ABE 00C assumes B(Z → bbar) = (21.7 ± 0.1)% and the B fractions fB⁰ = fB⁺ = (39.7±1.8)% and fB⁻ = (10.5±1.8)%.

### Γ(φf₀(980), f₀ → π⁺π⁻)/Γtotal Γ444/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.38</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BK</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(φω)/Γtotal Γ445/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.7</td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06T</td><td>BABR Repl. by LEES 14</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;21</td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

### Γ(φφ)/Γtotal Γ446/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.7 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19AP</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.8 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AS</td><td>LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 19AP</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BK</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.5 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>04X</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08BK</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.21 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BERGFELD</td><td>98</td><td>CLE2</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

² ABE 00C assumes B(Z → bbar) = (21.7 ± 0.1)% and the B fractions fB⁰ = fB⁺ = (39.7±1.8)% and fB⁻ = (10.5±1.8)%.

### Γ(a₀(980)±π∓, a∓₀ → ηπ∓)/Γtotal Γ447/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07Y</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).
Γ(a₀(1450)±π∓, a₀∓ → ηπ∓)/Γtotal Γ448/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;2.3</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07Y</td><td>BABR e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(π⁺π⁻π⁰)/Γtotal Γ449/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;7.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at T(4S).

Γ(ρ⁰π⁰)/Γtotal Γ450/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>2.0 ± 0.5 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>3.0 ± 0.5 ± 0.7</td><td></td><td>1,2 KUSAKA</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.4 ± 0.6 ± 0.3</td><td></td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>04Z</td><td>BABR e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>1.6 ± 2.0<br/>-1.4</td><td></td><td>1 JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.12<sup>+0.88</sup><sub>-0.82</sub> ± 0.76</td><td>1 DRAGIC</td><td>06</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by KUSAKA 08</td></tr><tr><td>5.1 ± 1.6 ± 0.9</td><td>DRAGIC</td><td>04</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by DRAGIC 06</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5.3</td><td>90</td><td>1 GORDON</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by DRAGIC 04</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 24</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLEO</td><td>Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;400</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²This is the first measurement that excludes contributions from ρ(1450) and ρ(1570) resonances.

Γ(ρ∓π∓)/Γtotal Γ451/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>23.0 ± 2.3 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>22.6 ± 1.1 ± 4.4</td><td>1,2 KUSAKA</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>22.6 ± 1.8 ± 2.2</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>03T</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>27.6<sup>+8.4</sup><sub>-7.4</sub> ± 4.2</td><td>1 JESSOP</td><td>00</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>20.8<sup>+6.0</sup><sub>-6.3</sub> ± 2.8</td><td>1 GORDON</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by KUSAKA 08</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 88</td><td>90</td><td>ASNER</td><td>96</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by JESSOP 00</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 520</td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5200</td><td>90</td><td>3 BEBEK</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²This is the first measurement that excludes contributions from ρ(1450) and ρ(1570) resonances.

³BEBEK 87 reports < 6.1 × 10⁻³ assuming the T(4S) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

Γ(π⁺π⁻π⁺π⁻)/Γtotal Γ452/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;11.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 VANHOEFER</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;23.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BB</td><td>BABR e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;19.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 CHIANG</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by VANHOEFER 14</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.3 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 ADAM</td><td>96D</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.8 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>3 ABREU</td><td>95N</td><td>DLPH</td><td>Sup. by ADAM 96</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 6.7 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²ADAM 96d assumes f<sub>B⁰</sub> = f<sub>B⁻</sub> = 0.39 and f<sub>B<sub>S</sub></sub> = 0.12.

³Assumes a B⁰, B⁻ production fraction of 0.39 and a B<sub>S</sub> production fraction of 0.12.

Γ(ρπ⁺π⁻)/Γtotal Γ453/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 8.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BB</td><td>BABR e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;12.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 VANHOEFER</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;12.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHIANG</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by VANHOEFER 14</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(ρ⁰π⁰)/Γtotal Γ454/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.96 ± 0.15 OUR FIT</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>0.97 ± 0.24 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.02 ± 0.30 ± 0.15</td><td>1,2 VANHOEFER</td><td>14</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.92 ± 0.32 ± 0.14</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08BB</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.4 ± 0.4<sup>+0.2</sup><sub>-0.3</sub></td><td>2 CHIANG</td><td>08</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by VANHOEFER 14</td></tr><tr><td>1.07 ± 0.33 ± 0.19</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07G</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BB</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.1</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05I</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 07G</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.1</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>03V</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 05I</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 18</td><td>90</td><td>3 GODANG</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;136</td><td>90</td><td>4 ABE</td><td>00C</td><td>SLD</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;280</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;290</td><td>90</td><td>5 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;430</td><td>90</td><td>5 BEBEK</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Signal significance 3.4 standard deviations.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 1.4 × 10⁻⁵.

⁴ABE 00C assumes B(Z → bB̄) = (21.7 ± 0.1)% and the B fractions f<sub>B⁰</sub> = f<sub>B⁺</sub> = (39.7<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-2.2</sub>)% and f<sub>B<sub>S</sub></sub> = (10.5<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-2.2</sub>)%.

⁵Paper assumes the T(4S) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

Γ(ρ⁰ρ⁰)/Γ(K*(892)⁰φ) Γ454/Γ377

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.5 ± 1.5 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>9.4 ± 1.7 ± 0.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

Γ(f₀(980)π⁺π⁻, f₀ → π⁺π⁻)/Γtotal Γ455/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 VANHOEFER</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.8 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 CHIANG</td><td>08</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(ρ⁰f₀(980), f₀ → π⁺π⁻)/Γtotal Γ456/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.8 ± 2.2 ± 1.1</td><td></td><td>1,2 VANHOEFER</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8.1</td><td>90</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15T</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;4.0</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08BB</td><td>BABR e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3</td><td>90</td><td>2 CHIANG</td><td>08</td><td>BELL Repl. by VANHOEFER 14</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;5.3</td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07G</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08BB</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Signal significance of 3.1 standard deviations.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(f₀(980)f₀(980), f₀ → π⁺π⁻, f₀ → π⁺π⁻)/Γtotal Γ457/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.19</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BB</td><td>BABR e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 VANHOEFER</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHIANG</td><td>08</td><td>BELL Repl. by VANHOEFER 14</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.16</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07G</td><td>BABR Repl. by AUBERT 08BB</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(f₀(980)f₀(980), f₀ → π⁺π⁻, f₀ → K⁺K⁻)/Γtotal Γ458/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.23</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>08BK</td><td>BABR e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

Γ(a₁(1260)∓π∓)/Γtotal Γ459/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>26 ± 5 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>22.2 ± 2.0 ± 2.8</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.9.</td></tr><tr><td>33.2 ± 3.8 ± 3.0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1,2 DALSEN0 12 BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)<br/>2,3 AUBERT 06V BABR e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 630</td><td>90</td><td>2 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 490</td><td>90</td><td>4 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1000</td><td>90</td><td>4 BEBEK</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹DALSEN0 12 reports B(B⁰ → a₁∓π∓) B(a₁∓ → π∓π⁺π⁻) = (11.1 ± 1.0 ± 1.4) × 10⁻⁶ which we rescaled assuming a₁(1260) decays only to 3π and B(a₁∓ → π∓π⁺π⁻) = 0.5.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³Assumes a₁(1260) decays only to 3π and B(a₁∓ → π∓π∓π∓) = 0.5.

⁴Paper assumes the T(4S) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

Γ(a₂(1320)∓π∓)/Γtotal Γ460/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 DALSEN0</td><td>12</td><td>BELL e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.0 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.4 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 BEBEK</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹DALSEN0 12 reports B(B⁰ → a₂∓π∓) B(a₂∓ → π∓π⁺π⁻) < 2.2 × 10⁻⁶ which we rescaled using B(a₂∓ → π∓π⁺π⁻) = 1/2 B(a₂∓ → 3π) = 0.35 ± 0.013.

²Paper assumes the T(4S) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

Γ(π⁺π⁻π⁰π⁰)/Γtotal Γ461/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.1 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBRECHT</td><td>90B</td><td>ARG e<sup>+e<sup>-</sup></sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at T(4S).
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

$$ \Gamma(\rho^{+} \rho^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{462}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

### 27.7±1.9 OUR AVERAGE

$$ 28.3 \pm 1.5 \pm 1.5 \qquad 1 \text{ VANHOEFER} \quad 16 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 25.5 \pm 2.1 \pm \frac{3.6}{3.9} \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07BF \text{ BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 22.8 \pm 3.8 \pm \frac{2.3}{-2.6} \qquad 1 \text{ SOMOV} \quad 06 \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by VANHOEFER} \quad 16 $$

$$ 25 \pm \frac{7}{-6} \pm \frac{5}{-6} \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 04G \text{ BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT, B} \quad 04R $$

$$ 30 \pm 4 \pm 5 \qquad 1,2 \text{ AUBERT, B} \quad 04R \text{ BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT} \quad 07BF $$

$$ <2200 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 90B \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²The quoted result is obtained after combining with AUBERT 04G result by AUBERT 04R alone gives $(33 \pm 4 \pm 5) \times 10^{-6}$.

$$ \Gamma(a_1(1260)^0 \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{463}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <1.1 \times 10^{-3} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 90B \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\omega\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{464}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <0.5 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 08AH \text{ BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ < 2.0 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ JEN} \quad 06 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 1.2 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT, B} \quad 04D \text{ BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT} \quad 08AH $$

$$ < 1.9 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ WANG} \quad 04A \text{ BELL} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 3 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 01G \text{ BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 5.5 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ JESSOP} \quad 00 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 14 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ BERGFELD} \quad 98 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad \text{Repl. by JESSOP} \quad 00 $$

$$ <460 \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 90B \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{-} \pi^{0})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{465}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE} \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <9.0 \times 10^{-3} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 90B \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at T(45).

$$ \Gamma(a_1(1260)^+ \rho^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{466}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <61 \qquad 90 \qquad 1,2 \text{ AUBERT, B} \quad 060 \text{ BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <3400 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 90B \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²Assumes $a_1(1260)$ decays only to $3\pi$ and $B(a_1^+ \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^\pm) = 0.5$.

$$ \Gamma(a_1(1260)^0 \rho^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{467}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <10.9 \pm 1.2 \pm 0.9 \qquad 1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 90B \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at T(45).

$$ \Gamma(b_1^\mp \pi^\pm, b_1^\mp \to \omega\pi^\mp)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{468}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <10.9 \pm 1.2 \pm 0.9 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07BI \text{ BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(b_1^0 \pi^0, b_1^0 \to \omega\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{469}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <1.9 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 08AG \text{ BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(b_1^\mp \rho^+, b_1^\mp \to \omega\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{470}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <1.4 \times 10^{-6} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 09AF \text{ BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(b_1^0 \rho^0, b_1^0 \to \omega\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{471}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <3.4 \times 10^{-6} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 09AF \text{ BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{+} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{-} \pi^{-})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{472}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <3.0 \times 10^{-3} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 90B \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at T(45).

$$ \Gamma(a_1(1260)^+ a_1(1260)^- , a_1^+ \to 2\pi^+ \pi^-, a_1^- \to 2\pi^- \pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{473}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 11.8 \pm 2.6 \pm 1.6 \qquad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 09AL \text{ BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ <6000 \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 90B \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <2800 \qquad 90 \qquad 2 \text{ BORTOLETT} \quad 089 \quad \text{CLEO} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at T(45).

²BORTOLETT 89 reports < 3.2 × 10⁻³ assuming the T(45) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(\pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^- \pi^- \pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{474}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-8}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ <1.1 \times 10^{-2} \qquad 90 \qquad 1 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 90B \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹ALBRECHT 90B limit assumes equal production of B⁰B⁰ and B⁺B⁻ at T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\rho\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{475}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-8}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 1.27 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.06 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 23T \text{ LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 and 13 TeV} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ < 1.25 \pm 0.27 \pm 0.18 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 17BJ \text{ LHCB} \quad \text{Repl. by AAIJ} \quad 23T $$

$$ < 1.47 \pm 0.62 \pm 0.35 \qquad 2 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 13BQ \text{ LHCB} \quad \text{Repl. by AAIJ} \quad 17BJ $$

$$ < 11 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ TSAI} \quad 07 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 41 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ CHANG} \quad 05 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 27 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 04U \text{ BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 140 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ BORNHEIM} \quad 03 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 120 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ ABE} \quad 020 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 700 \qquad 90 \qquad 3 \text{ COAN} \quad 99 \quad \text{CLE2} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ < 1800 \qquad 90 \qquad 4 \text{ BUSKULIC} \quad 96V \quad \text{ALEP} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{Z} $$

$$ <35000 \qquad 90 \qquad 5 \text{ ABREU} \quad 95N \quad \text{DLPH} \quad \text{Sup. by ADAM} \quad 96D $$

$$ < 3400 \qquad 90 \qquad 6 \text{ BORTOLETT} \quad 089 \quad \text{CLEO} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <12000 \qquad 90 \qquad 7 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 88F \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <17000 \qquad 90 \qquad 6 \text{ BEBEK} \quad 87 \quad \text{CLEO} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹Uses normalization mode B(B⁰ → K⁺π⁻) = (19.6 ± 0.5) × 10⁻⁶.

²Uses normalization mode B(B⁰ → K⁺π⁻) = (19.55 ± 0.54) × 10⁻⁶.

³Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

⁴BUSKULIC 96v assumes PDG 96 production fractions for B⁰, B⁺, Bₛ, baryons.

⁵Assumes a B⁰, B⁻ production fraction of 0.39 and a Bₛ production fraction of 0.12.

⁶Paper assumes the T(45) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

⁷ALBRECHT 88f reports < 1.3 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(45) decays 45% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{476}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 2.87 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.11 \qquad 1,2 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 17BD \text{ LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.83 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.17 \qquad 3 \text{ CHU} \quad 20 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <950 \qquad 90 \qquad 4 \text{ ABREU} \quad 95N \quad \text{DLPH} \quad \text{Sup. by ADAM} \quad 96D $$

$$ <250 \qquad 90 \qquad 5 \text{ BEBEK} \quad 89 \quad \text{CLEO} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 540 \pm 180 \pm 200 \qquad 6 \text{ ALBRECHT} \quad 88F \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

¹AAIJ 17BD reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0)] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) / [B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi^+)^+)] = 1.07 \pm 0.04 \times 0.04$ which we multiply by our best values $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0) = (1.27 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi^+)^+) = (99.902 \pm 0.009) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

²The branching ratio is given for $m_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85$ GeV.

³Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ from T(45) decays. This measurement is quoted for $M(\pi^+\pi^-) < 1.22$ GeV excluding the 0.46 < $M(\pi^+\pi^-) < 0.53$ GeV region.

⁴Assumes a B⁰, B⁻ production fraction of 0.39 and a Bₛ production fraction of 0.12.

⁵BEBEK 89 reports < 2.9 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(45) decays 43% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

⁶ALBRECHT 88f reports 6.0 ± 2.0 ± 2.2 assuming the T(45) decays 45% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(\rho\bar{p}K^+\pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{476}/\Gamma_{477} $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.46 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.02 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 17BD \text{ LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV} $$

¹The ratio is given for $m_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85$ GeV.

$$ \Gamma(\rho\bar{p}K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{478}/\Gamma $$

$$ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-6}) \quad \text{CL\%} \quad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT} $$

$$ 2.66 \pm 0.32 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \qquad 1,2 \text{ CHEN} \quad 08C \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 2.51 \pm 0.35 \pm 0.21 \qquad 1,2 \text{ CHEN} \quad 08C \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ 3.0 \pm 0.5 \pm 0.3 \qquad 2 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07AV \text{ BABR} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <7.2 \qquad 90 \qquad 2,3 \text{ ABEK} \quad 88F \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 2.40 \pm 0.64 \pm 0.28 \qquad 2,3,4 \text{ WANG} \quad 05A \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by CHEN} \quad 08C $$

$$ 1.88 \pm 0.77 \pm 0.23 \qquad 2,3,5 \text{ WANG} \quad 04 \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by WANG} \quad 05A $$

$$ <7.2 \qquad 90 \qquad 2,3 \text{ ABEK} \quad 88F \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$

$$ <7.2 \qquad 90 \qquad 2,3 \text{ ABEK} \quad 88F \quad \text{ARG} \quad e^{+} e^{-} \to \mathcal{T}(45) $$
¹Explicitly vetoes resonant production of $p\bar{p}$ from charmonium states.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

³Explicitly vetoes resonant production of $p\bar{p}$ from charmonium states and $pK^0$ production from $\Lambda_c$.

⁴Provides also results with $M_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85$ GeV/c² and angular asymmetry of $p\bar{p}$ system.

⁵The branching fraction for $M_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85$ is also reported.

$$ \Gamma(\Theta(1540)^+\bar{p}, \Theta^+ \to pK_S^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{479/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.05</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AV</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.23</td><td>90</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(f_j(2220)K^0, f_j \to p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{480/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.45</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AV</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{477/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.3±0.5±0.2</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BD</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 17BD reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to p\bar{p}K^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0)] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] / [B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi)^\pm)] = (2.34 \pm 0.12) \times 0.12$ which we multiply by our best values $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0) = (1.27 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi)^\pm) = (99.902 \pm 0.009) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

²The branching ratio is given for $m_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85$ GeV.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}K^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{481/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

¹.24 $\pm 0.28/0.25$ OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>1.18 $\pm 0.29/0.25$</td><td>1,2 CHEN</td><td>08C</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>1.47 $\pm 0.45$</td><td>0.40</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>07AV</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;7.6</td><td>90</td><td>2 WANG</td><td>04</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Explicitly vetoes resonant production of $p\bar{p}$ from charmonium states.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}\pi^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{484/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.0±1.8±0.6</td><td>19</td><td>PAL</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(f_j(2220)K_0^*, f_j \to p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{482/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.15</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>07AV</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{483/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>12.1±3.1±0.5</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>17BD</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 17BD reports $[\Gamma(B^0 \to p\bar{p}K^+K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0)] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] / [B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi)^\pm)] = (0.045 \pm 0.011 \pm 0.004)$ which we multiply by our best values $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0) = (1.27 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(K^*(892) \to (K\pi)^\pm) = (99.902 \pm 0.009) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

²The branching ratio is given for $m_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85$ GeV.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}K^+K^-)/\Gamma(p\bar{p}K^+\pi^-) \quad \Gamma_{483/\Gamma_{477}} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.9±0.5±0.2</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17BD</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹The ratio is given for $m_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85$ GeV.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{p}p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{485/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-8</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.2±0.4±0.1</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>23AD</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;20</td><td>90</td><td>2 LEES</td><td>18C</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹AAIJ 23AD reports $(2.2 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.1 \pm 0.1) \times 10^{-8}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to p\bar{p}p\bar{p})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0)] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p})] \text{ assuming } B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0) = (1.27 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to p\bar{p}) = (2.120 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$. It also includes $B(K^*(892)^0 \to K^+\pi^-) = 2/3$.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{\Lambda}\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{486/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

3.16 $\pm 0.24$ OUR AVERAGE

<table><tr><td>3.21 $\pm 0.28/0.25$</td><td>±0.16</td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>3.07 $\pm 0.31$</td><td>±0.23</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AC</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>3.23 $\pm 0.33/0.29$</td><td>±0.29</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>07C</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>2.62 $\pm 0.44/0.40$</td><td>±0.31</td><td>1,2 WANG</td><td>05A</td><td>BELL Repl. by WANG 07C</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>3.97 $\pm 1.00/0.80$</td><td>±0.56</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>03</td><td>BELL Repl. by WANG 05A</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;13</td><td>90</td><td>1 COAN</td><td>99</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;180</td><td>90</td><td>3 ALBRECHT</td><td>88F</td><td>ARG e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

²Provides also results with $M_{p\bar{p}} < 2.85$ GeV/c² and angular asymmetry of $p\bar{\Lambda}$ system.

³ALBRECHT 88F reports $< 2.0 \times 10^{-4}$ assuming the $\Upsilon(4S)$ decays 45% to $B^0\bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{\Lambda}\pi^-\gamma)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{487/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.5 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LAI</td><td>14</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(p\Sigma(1385^-))/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{488/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.26</td><td>90</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>07C</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma[\Delta(1232)^+\bar{p}) + \Gamma(\Delta(1232)^-)\bar{p})]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{489/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td></td><td>PAL</td><td>19</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Delta^0\bar{\Lambda})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{490/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.93</td><td>90</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>07C</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{\Lambda}K^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{491/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.82</td><td>90</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>03</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{\Lambda}D^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{492/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>25.1±2.6±3.5</td><td></td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(p\bar{\Lambda}D^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{493/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>33.6±6.3±4.4</td><td></td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>15</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(p\Sigma^0\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{494/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.17 $\pm 0.43/0.40$</td><td>±0.07</td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>23</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;3.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 WANG</td><td>03</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}\Lambda)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{495/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.32</td><td>90</td><td>1 TSAI</td><td>07</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.69</td><td>90</td><td>1 CHANG</td><td>05</td><td>BELL Repl. by TSAI 07</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;1.2</td><td>90</td><td>1 BORNHEIM</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;1.0</td><td>90</td><td>1 ABE</td><td>020</td><td>BELL Repl. by CHANG 05</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;3.9</td><td>90</td><td>1 COAN</td><td>99</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{496/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.76 $\pm 0.84/0.68$</td><td>±0.61</td><td>1,2 CHANG</td><td>09</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Υ(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Excluding charmonium events in $2.85 < m_{\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}} < 3.128$ GeV/c² and $3.315 < m_{\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}} < 3.735$ GeV/c². Measurements in various $m_{\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}}$ bins are also reported.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

### Γ(ΛΛK*0)/Γtotal

Γ⁴⁹⁷/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.46<sup>+0.87</sup><sub>-0.72</sub>±0.34</td><td>1,2 CHANG</td><td>09</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Excluding charmonium events in 2.85 < $m_{ΛΛ}$ < 3.128 GeV/c² and 3.315 < $m_{ΛΛ}$ < 3.735 GeV/c². Measurements in various $m_{ΛΛ}$ bins are also reported.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(ΛΛD⁰)/Γtotal

Γ⁴⁹⁸/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.00<sup>+0.30</sup><sub>-0.26</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.98<sup>+0.29</sup><sub>-0.26</sub>±0.19</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>14B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.05<sup>+0.57</sup><sub>-0.44</sub>±0.14</td><td>2 CHANG</td><td>09</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Evidence for 3.4 st. dev. signal significance.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(D⁰Σ⁰Λ⁺c.c.)/Γtotal

Γ⁴⁹⁹/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><1.31 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>14B</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Here Σ⁰ → Λγ.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(Δ⁰Σ⁰)/Γtotal

Γ⁵⁰⁰/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><0.0015</td><td>90</td><td>1 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ BORTOLETTO 89 reports < 0.0018 assuming T(45) decays 43% to B⁰D⁰. We rescale to 50%.

### Γ(Δ⁺Δ⁻)/Γtotal

Γ⁵⁰¹/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><1.11 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BORTOLETTO89</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ BORTOLETTO 89 reports < 1.3 × 10⁻⁴ assuming T(45) decays 43% to B⁰D⁰. We rescale to 50%.

### Γ(D⁰p̄p̄)/Γtotal

Γ⁵⁰²/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

### 1.04±0.07 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.02±0.04±0.06</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..12</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.18±0.15±0.16</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>02W</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹ 1.13±0.06±0.08 ² AUBERT,B 06s BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 12

¹ Uses the values of D and D* branching fractions from PDG 08.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(D<sup>-</sup><sub>s</sub>Λp̄)/Γtotal

Γ⁵⁰³/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.8±0.8±0.3</td><td>1,2 MEDVEDEVA</td><td>07</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

² MEDVEDEVA 07 reports (2.9±0.7±0.5±0.4)×10⁻⁵ from a measurement of Γ(B⁰ → D<sup>-</sup><sub>s</sub>Λp̄)/Γ<sub>total</sub> [× [B(D<sup>-</sup><sub>s</sub> → φπ<sup>+</sup>)] assuming B(D<sup>-</sup><sub>s</sub> → φπ<sup>+</sup>) = (4.4±0.6)×10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(D<sup>-</sup><sub>s</sub> → φπ<sup>+</sup>) = (4.5±0.4)×10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

### Γ(D* (2007) p̄p̄)/Γtotal

Γ⁵⁰⁴/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

### 0.99±0.11 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.97±0.07±0.09</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..12</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.20<sup>+0.33</sup><sub>-0.29</sub>±0.21</td><td>2 ABE</td><td>02W</td><td>BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹ 1.01±0.10±0.09 ² AUBERT,B 06s BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 12

¹ Uses the values of D and D* branching fractions from PDG 08.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(D* (2010) p̄p̄)/Γtotal

Γ⁵⁰⁵/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>14.5<sup>+3.4</sup><sub>-3.0</sub>±2.7</td><td>1 ANDERSON</td><td>01</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(D<sup>-</sup>p̄p<sup>+</sup>)/Γtotal

Γ⁵⁰⁶/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.32±0.10±0.29</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..12</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

³ 3.38±0.14±0.29 ² AUBERT,B 06s BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 12

¹ Uses the values of D and D* branching fractions from PDG 08.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(D* (2010) p̄p<sup>+</sup>)/Γtotal

Γ⁵⁰⁷/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.7±0.5 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.2.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4.55±0.16±0.39</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..12</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>6.5<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.2</sub>±1.0</td><td>2 ANDERSON</td><td>01</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

4.81±0.22±0.44 ² AUBERT,B 06s BABR Repl. by DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 12

¹ Uses the values of D and D* branching fractions from PDG 08.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(D⁰p̄p<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)/Γtotal

Γ⁵⁰⁸/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.99±0.21±0.45</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..12</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses the values of D and D* branching fractions from PDG 08.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(D⁰p̄p<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)/Γtotal

Γ⁵⁰⁹/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.91±0.36±0.29</td><td>1,2 DEL-AMO-SA..12</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Uses the values of D and D* branching fractions from PDG 08.

² Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(Θ<sub>c</sub>p̄p<sup>+</sup>, Θ<sub>c</sub> → D<sup>-</sup>p̄)/Γtotal

Γ⁵¹⁰/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><9</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06s</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(Θ<sub>c</sub>p̄p<sup>+</sup>, Θ<sub>c</sub> → D*<sup>-</sup>p̄)/Γtotal

Γ⁵¹¹/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><14</td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT,B</td><td>06s</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(Σ<sup>-</sup><sub>c</sub>Δ<sup>++</sup>)/Γtotal

Γ⁵¹²/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><8 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 PROCARIO</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2 e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ PROCARIO 94 reports < 0.0012 from a measurement of Γ(B⁰ → Σ<sup>-</sup><sub>c</sub>Δ<sup>++</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub> × [B(Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)] assuming B(Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>) = 0.043, which we rescale to our best value B(Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>) = 6.24 × 10⁻².

### Γ(Σ<sup>-</sup><sub>c</sub> p̄p<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup>)/Γtotal

Γ⁵¹³/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

¹.02±0.14 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.23±0.05±0.33</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>13H</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.90±0.11±0.04</td><td>1,3 PARK</td><td>07</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>1.34<sup>+0.22</sup><sub>-0.20</sub>±0.06</td><td>4 DYTMAN</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.88±0.16±0.04</td><td>5 GABYSHEV</td><td>02</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by PARK 07</td></tr><tr><td>1.33<sup>+0.46</sup><sub>-0.42</sub>±0.37</td><td>6 FU</td><td>97</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by DYTMAN 02</td></tr></tbody></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.02±0.14 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_605.png" /></figure>

Γ(Σ̄<sub>c</sub> p̄p<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub> (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)

¹ Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

² Uses Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup> mode. The second error includes the uncertainty of the branching fraction of the Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> decay, B(Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>) = (5.0±1.3)%.

³ PARK 07 reports (11.2±0.5±3.2) × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of Γ(B⁰ → Σ̄<sub>c</sub> p̄p<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub> × [B(Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>)] assuming B(Λ<sup>+</sup><sub>c</sub> → pK<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>) =
(5.0 ± 1.3) × 10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (6.24 ± 0.28) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴DYTMAN 02 reports (1.67⁺⁰.²⁷⁻⁰.²⁵) × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → Λ_c⁻ pπ⁺π⁻)/Γ_total] × [B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺)] assuming B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (6.24 ± 0.28) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵GABYSHEV 02 reports (1.1 ± 0.2) × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → Λ_c⁻ pπ⁺π⁻)/Γ_total] × [B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺)] assuming B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (6.24 ± 0.28) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁶FU 97 uses PDG 96 values of Λ_c branching fraction.

<table><caption>Γ(Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> p)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>1.55±0.17 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.51±0.17±0.07</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>08BN BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.19<sup>+0.56</sup><sub>-0.49</sub>±0.65</td><td>1,3 GABYSHEV</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.10<sup>+0.67</sup><sub>-0.55</sub>±0.77</td><td>1,4 AUBERT</td><td>07AV BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08BN</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 9</td><td>90</td><td>1,5 DYTMAN</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 3.1</td><td>90</td><td>1,4 GABYSHEV</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;21</td><td>90</td><td>6 FU</td><td>97 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²AUBERT 08BN reports (1.89 ± 0.21 ± 0.49) × 10⁻⁵ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → Λ_c⁻ p)/Γ_total] × [B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺)] assuming B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (5.0 ± 1.3) × 10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (6.24 ± 0.28) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³The second error for GABYSHEV 03 includes the systematic and the error of Λ_c → pK⁻π⁻ decay branching fraction.

⁴Uses the value for Λ_c → pK⁻π⁺ branching ratio (5.0 ± 1.3%).

⁵DYTMAN 02 measurement uses B(Λ_c⁻ → pK⁻π⁻) = 5.0 ± 1.3%. The second error includes the systematic and the uncertainty of the branching ratio.

⁶FU 97 uses PDG 96 values of Λ_c branching ratio.

<table><caption>Γ(Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> pρ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.55<sup>+0.17</sup><sub>-0.07</sub></td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>10H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.9</td><td>90</td><td>3 FU</td><td>97 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT 10H reports (1.94 ± 0.17 ± 0.52) × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → Λ_c⁻ pρ<sup>0</sup>)/Γ_total] × [B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺)] assuming B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (5.0 ± 1.3) × 10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (6.24 ± 0.28) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

³FU 97 uses PDG 96 values of Λ_c branching ratio.

<table><caption>Γ(Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> pK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.0±0.4±0.1</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>15B BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹LEES 15B reports [Γ(B⁰ → Λ_c⁻ pK<sup>+</sup>K<sup>-</sup>)/Γ_total] × [B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺)] = (12.5 ± 2.0 ± 1.0) × 10⁻⁷ which we divide by our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (6.24 ± 0.28) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><caption>Γ(Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> pφ)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>15B BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹LEES 15B reports < 1.2 × 10⁻⁵ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → Λ_c⁻ pφ)/Γ_total] × [B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺)] assuming B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (5.0 ± 1.3) × 10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = 6.24 × 10⁻².

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><caption>Γ(Σ<sub>c</sub>(2455)<sup>-</sup> p)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;24</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>10H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT 10H reports [Γ(B⁰ → Σ_c(2455)<sup>-</sup> p)/Γ_total] × [B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺)] < 1.5 × 10⁻⁶ which we divide by our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = 6.24 × 10⁻².

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

<table><caption>Γ(Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> pρ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>0</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.07 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 FU</td><td>97 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹FU 97 uses PDG 96 values of Λ_c branching ratio.

<table><caption>Γ(Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> pρ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.74 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 FU</td><td>97 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹FU 97 uses PDG 96 values of Λ_c branching ratio.

<table><caption>Γ(Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>-</sup> pρ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>-(nonresonant))/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

⁵.⁵±1.⁰ OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3.

<table><tbody><tr><td>7.9±0.4±2.0</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>13H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.1±0.8±0.2</td><td>1,3 PARK</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Uses Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺ mode. The second error includes the uncertainty of the branching fraction of the Λ_c decay, B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (5.0 ± 1.3)%.

³PARK 07 reports (6.4 ± 0.4 ± 1.9) × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → Λ_c⁻ pρ<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup>-(nonresonant))/Γ_total] × [B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺)] assuming B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (5.0 ± 1.3) × 10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (6.24 ± 0.28) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

<table><caption>Γ(Σ<sub>c</sub>(2520)<sup>-</sup> pρ<sup>+</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><caption>1.02±0.18 OUR AVERAGE</caption><tbody><tr><td>1.15±0.10±0.30</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>13H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.96±0.22±0.04</td><td>1,3 PARK</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.3 ± 0.5 ± 0.1</td><td>4 GABYSHEV</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by PARK 07</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Uses Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺ mode. The second error includes the uncertainty of the branching fraction of the Λ_c decay, B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (5.0 ± 1.3)%.

³PARK 07 reports (1.2 ± 0.1 ± 0.4) × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → Σ_c(2520)<sup>-</sup> pρ<sup>+</sup>)/Γ_total] × [B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺)] assuming B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (5.0 ± 1.3) × 10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (6.24 ± 0.28) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴GABYSHEV 02 reports (1.63⁺⁰.⁶⁴⁻⁰.⁵⁸) × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → Σ_c(2520)<sup>-</sup> pρ<sup>+</sup>)/Γ_total] × [B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺)] assuming B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (6.24 ± 0.28) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

<table><caption>Γ(Σ<sub>c</sub>(2520)<sup>0</sup> pρ<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.31 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>13H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.38 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 PARK</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1.21 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 GABYSHEV</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by PARK 07</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²Uses the value for Λ_c → pK⁻π⁺ branching ratio (5.0 ± 1.3%).

<table><caption>Γ(Σ<sub>c</sub>(2455)<sup>0</sup> N<sup>0</sup>, N<sup>0</sup> → pρ<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.64±0.16±0.03</td><td>1,2 KIM</td><td>08 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(4S).

²KIM 08 reports (0.80 ± 0.15 ± 0.25) × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → Σ_c(2455)<sup>0</sup> N<sup>0</sup>, N<sup>0</sup> → pρ<sup>-</sup>)/Γ_total] × [B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺)] assuming B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (5.0 ± 1.3) × 10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(Λ_c⁺ → pK⁻π⁺) = (6.24 ± 0.28) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

<table><caption>Γ(Σ<sub>c</sub>(2455)<sup>0</sup> pρ<sup>-</sup>)/Γ<sub>total</sub></caption><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

¹.⁰⁸±0.⁰⁹ OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.09±0.06±0.07</td><td>LI</td><td>23E BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.91±0.07±0.24</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>13H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.8 ± 0.6 ± 0.1</td><td>³ DYTMAN</td><td>02 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.12±0.21±0.05</td><td>1,4 PARK</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>Repl. by LI 23E.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.38<sup>+0.37</sup><sub>-0.33</sub>±0.02</td><td>5 GABYSHEV</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by PARK 07</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²Uses $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$ mode. The second error includes the uncertainty of the branching fraction of the $\Lambda_c$ decay, $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3)\%$.

³DYTMAN 02 reports $(2.2 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Sigma_c(2455)^0 p\pi^-)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 0.05$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴PARK 07 reports $(1.4 \pm 0.2 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Sigma_c(2455)^0 p\pi^-)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵GABYSHEV 02 reports $(0.48^{+0.46}_{-0.41}) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Sigma_c(2455)^0 p\pi^-)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 0.05$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma_c(2455)^- p\pi^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{524}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>1.89&plusmn;0.15 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.84&plusmn;0.11&plusmn;0.12</td><td>LI</td><td>23E BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>2.13&plusmn;0.10&plusmn;0.56</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>13H BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>3.0&plusmn;0.9&plusmn;0.1</td><td>3 DYTMAN</td><td>02 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">&bull;&bull; We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. &bull;&bull;&bull;</td></tr><tr><td>1.68&plusmn;0.26<sup>+0.08</sup><sub>-0.07</sub></td><td>1,4 PARK</td><td>07 BELL</td><td>Repl. by LI 23E.</td></tr><tr><td>1.9&plusmn;0.6&plusmn;0.1</td><td>5 GABYSHEV</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by PARK 07</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²Uses $\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+$ mode. The second error includes the uncertainty of the branching fraction of the $\Lambda_c$ decay, $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3)\%$.

³DYTMAN 02 reports $(3.7 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Sigma_c(2455)^- p\pi^+)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 0.05$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴PARK 07 reports $(2.1 \pm 0.2 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Sigma_c(2455)^- p\pi^+)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁵GABYSHEV 02 reports $(2.38^{+0.75}_{-0.69}) \times 10^{-4}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Sigma_c(2455)^- p\pi^+)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 0.05$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^- pK^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{525}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.5&plusmn;0.7&plusmn;0.2</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>09AG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT 09AG reports $(4.33 \pm 0.82 \pm 0.33 \pm 1.13) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Lambda_c^- pK^+\pi^-)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\Sigma_c(2455)^- pK^+, \Sigma_c^- \to \Lambda_c^-\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{526}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.89&plusmn;0.25&plusmn;0.04</td><td>1,2 AUBERT</td><td>09AG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AUBERT 09AG reports $(1.11 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.29) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Sigma_c(2455)^- pK^+, \Sigma_c^- \to \Lambda_c^-\pi^-)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^- pK^+(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{527}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;2.42</strong></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>09AG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^- p\bar{p}p)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{530}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;2.8</strong></td><td>1 LEES</td><td>14C BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45) and B(Λ_c^+ → pK^-π^+) = 0.050 ± 0.013.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^- \Lambda K^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{531}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.8&plusmn;1.0&plusmn;0.2</td><td>1,2 LEES</td><td>11F BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ from Upsilon(4S) decays.

²LEES 11F reports $(3.8 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.2 \pm 1.0) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Lambda_c^- \Lambda K^+)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)] \times [B(\Lambda^- \to pK^-\pi^-)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\Lambda^- \to pK^-\pi^-) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best values $B(\Lambda_c^- \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(\Lambda^- \to pK^-\pi^-) = (64.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values. The reported uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and $\Lambda_c^-$ branching fraction uncertainty.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^- \Lambda_c^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{532}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>&lt;1.6</strong></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AA LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;6.2</th><th>90</th><th>2 UCHIDA</th><th>08 BELL</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</th></tr></thead></table>

¹Uses $B(B^0 \to D^+D_s^-) = (7.2 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-3}$.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c(2593)^- / \Lambda_c(2625)^- p)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{533}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.1 &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2 DYTMAN</td><td>02 CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²DYTMAN 02 measurement uses $B(\Lambda_c^- \to pK^-\pi^-) = 5.0 \pm 1.3\%$. The second error includes the systematic and the uncertainty of the branching ratio.

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_c^- \Lambda_c^+)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{534}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.2&plusmn;0.8&plusmn;0.1</td><td>1,2 LI</td><td>19C BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses fully reconstructed B⁰ on tag side with recoil against $\Lambda_c^+$.

²LI 19C reports $(1.16 \pm 0.74 \pm 0.33) \times 10^{-3}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Xi_c^- \Lambda_c^+)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.28 \pm 0.32) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_c^- \Lambda_c^+, \Xi_c^- \to \Xi^+\pi^-\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{535}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

².4&plusmn;1.1 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.8.

<table><thead><tr><th>3.3&plusmn;0.8<sup>+0.2</sup><sub>-0.1</sub></th><th>1 LI</th><th>19C BELL</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>1.2&plusmn;0.9&plusmn;0.1</th><th>2,3 AUBERT</th><th>08H BABR</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>7.5<sup>+3.3</sup><sub>-2.7</sub>&plusmn;0.3</th><th>3,4 CHISTOV</th><th>06A BELL</th><th>Repl. by LI 19C</th></tr></thead></table>

¹LI 19C reports $(3.32 \pm 0.74 \pm 0.33) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Xi_c^- \Lambda_c^+)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.28 \pm 0.32) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²AUBERT 08H reports $(1.5 \pm 1.07 \pm 0.44) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Xi_c^- \Lambda_c^+)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

⁴CHISTOV 06A reports $(9.3^{+3.7}_{-2.8}) \times 10^{-5}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Xi_c^- \Lambda_c^+)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (5.0 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_c^- \Lambda_c^+, \Xi_c^- \to pK^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{536}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.3&plusmn;1.6&plusmn;0.2</td><td>1 LI</td><td>19C BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹LI 19C reports $(5.27 \pm 1.51 \pm 0.69) \times 10^{-6}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B^0 \to \Xi_c^- \Lambda_c^+)]/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.28 \pm 0.32) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c^+ \Lambda_c^- K^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{537}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>3.99&plusmn;0.76&plusmn;0.51</th><th>1 LI</th><th>18D BELL</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>3.8&plusmn;3.1&plusmn;2.1</th><th>2,3 AUBERT</th><th>08H BABR</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; T(45)</th></tr></thead></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>7.9<sup>+2.9</sup><sub>-2.3</sub>&plusmn;4.3</th><th>2,3 GABYSHEV</th><th>06 BELL</th><th>Repl. by LI 18D</th></tr></thead></table>
¹Assumes $B(\tau(4S) \to B^0 \bar{B}^0) = 48.6 \pm 0.6\%$ and $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+) = 6.23 \pm 0.33\%$.

²Assumes $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+) = 5.0 \pm 1.3\%$.

³Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c(2910)^- p, \bar{\Lambda}_c \to \Xi_c(2455)^{--} \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{538/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.24&plusmn;0.35&plusmn;0.10</td><td>LI</td><td>23E</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda_c(2910)^- p, \bar{\Lambda}_c \to \Xi_c(2455)^0 \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{539/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-6</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.5&plusmn;3.6&plusmn;1.6</td><td>LI</td><td>23E</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_c(2930)^- \Lambda_c^+, \bar{\Xi}_c \to \Lambda_c^- K^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{540/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.37&plusmn;0.51&plusmn;0.31</td><td>1</td><td>LI</td><td>18D BELL e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes $B(\tau(4S) \to B^0 \bar{B}^0) = 48.6 \pm 0.6\%$ and $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^- \pi^+) = 6.23 \pm 0.33\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda(\psi_{DS}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{541/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 0.13-5.2 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>23B</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;2.1 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></th><th>90</th><th>2 HADJIVASILIQUI2</th><th>BELL</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</th></tr></thead></table>

¹LEES 23B searched for $\psi_{DS}$ in the recoil mass against $\Lambda$ and the fully reconstructed accompanying B meson. The cited upper limit is for $m(\psi_{DS})$ between 1 and 4.1 GeV/c².

²HADJIVASILIQUI 22 searched for $\psi_{DS}$ in the mass range 1-3.9 GeV/c², in the recoil mass against $\Lambda$ and the accompanying B meson. The cited upper limit is for $m(\psi_{DS}) = 2.0$ GeV/c² and is the most stringent. The least stringent limit is $< 3.8 \times 10^{-5}$ at $m(\psi_{DS}) = 3.9$ GeV/c².

$$ \Gamma(\gamma\gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{542/\Gamma} $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.2 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 DEL-AMO-SA..11A</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;6.2 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></th><th>90</th><th>1 VILLA</th><th>06</th><th>BELL</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.7 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AUBERT</td><td>01l</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.9 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 ACCIARRI</td><td>95l</td><td>L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

²ACCIARRI 95l assumes $f_{B0} = 39.5 \pm 4.0$ and $f_{B_S} = 12.0 \pm 3.0\%$.

$$ \Gamma(e^+ e^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{543/\Gamma} $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 2.5 &times; 10<sup>-9</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>20W</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt; 8.3 &times; 10<sup>-8</sup></th><th>90</th><th>AALTONEN</th><th>09p</th><th>CDF</th><th>p&#773; at 1.96 TeV</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;11.3 &times; 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>08p</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 6.1 &times; 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 AUBERT</td><td>05w</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08p</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.9 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 CHANG</td><td>03</td><td>BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 8.3 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>2 BERGFELD</td><td>00b</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 1.4 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>3 ACCIARRI</td><td>97b</td><td>L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 5.9 &times; 10<sup>-6</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AMMAR</td><td>94</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by BERGFELD 00b</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 2.6 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>4 AVERY</td><td>89b</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 7.6 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>5 ALBRECHT</td><td>87d</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 6.4 &times; 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>6 AVERY</td><td>87</td><td>CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 3 &times; 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>GILES</td><td>84</td><td>CLEO</td><td>Repl. by AVERY 87</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes no contribution from $B_S^0 \to e^+e^-$ decays.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

³ACCIARRI 97B assume PDG 96 production fractions for $B^+$, $B^0$, $B_S$, and $\Lambda_b$.

⁴AVERY 89B reports $< 3 \times 10^{-5}$ assuming the $\tau(4S)$ decays 43% to $B^0 \bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

⁵ALBRECHT 87D reports $< 8.5 \times 10^{-5}$ assuming the $\tau(4S)$ decays 45% to $B^0 \bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

⁶AVERY 87 reports $< 8 \times 10^{-5}$ assuming the $\tau(4S)$ decays 40% to $B^0 \bar{B}^0$. We rescale to 50%.

$$ \Gamma(e^+ e^- \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{544/\Gamma} $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.2 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08c</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{545/\Gamma} $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-10</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 1.5</td><td>90</td><td>1,2 TUMASYAN</td><td>23A</td><td>CMS pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>1.2 &plusmn; 0.8<br>&minus;0.7</th><th>95</th><th>3 AAIJ</th><th>22</th><th>LHCB</th><th>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 3.6</td><td>95</td><td>4 SIRUNYAN</td><td>20AG</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&minus; 1.9&plusmn;1.6</td><td>95</td><td>5,6 AABOUD</td><td>19L</td><td>ATLS</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.5 &plusmn; 1.2 &plusmn; 0.2<br>&minus;1.0</td><td>90</td><td>7 AAIJ</td><td>17AI LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 22</td></tr><tr><td>&minus;2.5 &plusmn; 2.0</td><td>90</td><td>8 AABOUD</td><td>16L ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AABOUD 19L</td></tr><tr><td>3.9 &plusmn; 1.6<br>&minus;1.4</td><td>90</td><td>9 KHACHATRY...15BE LHC</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 8.0</td><td>90</td><td>10 AAIJ</td><td>13B LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13BA</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 6.3</td><td>90</td><td>11 AAIJ</td><td>13BA LHCB</td><td>Repl. by KHACHATRYAN 15BE</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 38</td><td>90</td><td>12 AALTONEN</td><td>13F CDF</td><td>p&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.5 &plusmn; 2.1<br>&minus;1.8</td><td>90</td><td>13 CHATRCHYAN 13AW CMS</td><td>Repl. by SIRUNYAN 20AG</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 26</td><td>90</td><td>10 AAIJ</td><td>12A LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 12W</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 8.1</td><td>90</td><td>14 AAIJ</td><td>12W LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13B</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 14</td><td>90</td><td>14 CHATRCHYAN 12A CMS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 120</td><td>90</td><td>15 AAIJ</td><td>11B LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 12A</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 50</td><td>90</td><td>14 AALTONEN</td><td>11AG CDF</td><td>p&#773; at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt; 37</td><td>90</td><td>14 CHATRCHYAN 11T CMS</td><td>Repl. by CHATRCHYAN 12A</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Corresponds to a 95% CL upper limit of $< 1.9 \times 10^{-10}$.

²Uses normalization mode $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.020 \pm 0.019) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi \to \mu^+ \mu^-) = (5.961 \pm 0.033) \times 10^{-2}$.

³Corresponds to a 95% CL upper limit of $< 2.6 \times 10^{-10}$.

⁴Uses normalization mode $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.01 \pm 0.03) \times 10^{-3}$.

⁵Corresponds to a 95% CL upper limit of $< 2.1 \times 10^{-10}$.

⁶Uses normalization mode $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (1.010 \pm 0.029) \times 10^{-3}$ and $B$ production ratio $f(b \to B_S^0)/f(b \to B^0) = 0.256 \pm 0.013$.

⁷Corresponds to a 95% CL upper limit of $< 3.4 \times 10^{-10}$.

⁸This value is obtained from a profile-likelihood fit, see Fig. 9. It corresponds to an upper limit of $< 0.42 \times 10^{-9}$ at 95% C.L.

⁹Derived from the combined fit to CMS and LHCb data. Uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic component. Also reports $B(B^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-)/B(B_S \to \mu^+ \mu^-) = 0.14 \pm 0.08$.

¹⁰Uses $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+ \to \mu^+ \mu^- K^+) = (6.01 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-5}$ and $B(B^0 \to K^+ \pi^-) = (1.94 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-5}$ for normalization.

¹¹Reports also a limit of $< 7.4 \times 10^{-10}$ at 95% CL. Uses normalization modes $B^+ \to J/\psi K^+ \to \mu^+ \mu^- K^+$ and $B^0 \to K^+ \pi^-$.

¹²Uses normalization mode $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) = (10.22 \pm 0.35) \times 10^{-4}$.

¹³Reports also a limit of $< 9.2 \times 10^{-10}$ at 90% CL. and uses $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+) \to \mu^+ \mu^- K^+) = (6.0 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-5}$ for normalization.

¹⁴Uses $B(B^+ \to J/\psi K^+ \to \mu^+ \mu^- K^+) = (6.01 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-5}$.

¹⁵Uses $B$ production ratio $f(b \to B^+)/f(b \to B_S^0) = 3.71 \pm 0.47$ and three normalization modes.

$$ \Gamma(\mu^+ \mu^- \gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{546/\Gamma} $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.6 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>08c</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\tau^+ \tau^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{550/\Gamma} $$

Test for $\Delta B=1$ weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.1 &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>95</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17AI LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;4.1 &times; 10<sup>-3</sup></th><th>90</th><th>2 AUBERT</th><th>06s</th><th>BABR</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</th></tr></thead></table>

¹Assuming no contribution from $B_S^0 \to \tau^+ \tau^-$.

²Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\tau(4S)$.

$$ \Gamma(\mu^+ \mu^- \mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{547/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.8 &times; 10<sup>-10</sup></td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;6.9 &times; 10<sup>-10</sup></th><th>95</th><th>AAIJ</th><th>17N LHCB</th><th>pp at 7, 8 TeV</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;6.6 &times; 10<sup>-9</sup></th><th>95</th><th>1 AAIJ</th><th>13AW LHCB</th><th>Repl. by AAIJ 17N</th></tr></thead></table>

¹Also reports a limit of $< 5.3 \times 10^{-9}$ at 90% CL.

$$ \Gamma(SP, S \to \mu^+ \mu^-, P \to \mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{548/\Gamma} $$

Here $S$ and $P$ are the hypothetical scalar and pseudoscalar particles with masses of 2.5 GeV/c² and 214.3 MeV/c², respectively.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.0 &times; 10<sup>-10</sup></td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17N</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;5.1 &times; 10<sup>-9</sup></th><th>90</th><th>1 AAIJ</th><th>13AW LHCB</th><th>Repl. by AAIJ 17N</th></tr></thead></table>

¹Also reports a limit of $< 6.3 \times 10^{-9}$ at 95% CL.

$$ \Gamma(aa, a \to \mu^+ \mu^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{549/\Gamma} $$

Here particle $a$ is a scalar with a mass of 1 GeV/c².

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.3 &times; 10<sup>-10</sup></td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>22q</td><td>LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^0 \ell^- \ell^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{551/\Gamma} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.3 &times; 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 LEES</td><td>13M</td><td>BABR e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;1.5 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></th><th>90</th><th>1 WEI</th><th>08A BELL</th><th>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> &rarr; &Upsilon;(4S)</th></tr></thead></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>&lt;1.2 &times; 10<sup>-7</sup></th><th>90</th><th>1 AUBERT</th><th>07AG BABR</th><th>Repl. by LEES 13M</th></tr></thead></table>

¹Assumes equal production of $B^+$ and $B^0$ at the $\tau(4S)$.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰

### Γ(π⁰νν)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁵⁷/Γ

Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interaction.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>GRYGIER</td><td>17 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LUTZ</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>CHEN</td><td>07D BELL</td><td>Repl. by LUTZ 13</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(π⁰e⁺e⁻)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁵²/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;8.4 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>13M BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.3 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>WEI</td><td>08A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.4 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AG BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13M</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(π⁰μ⁺μ⁻)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁵³/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.9 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>13M BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;1.8 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>WEI</td><td>08A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.1 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>07AG BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(ηe⁺ℓ⁻)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁵⁴/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.4 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>13M BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(ηe⁺e⁻)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁵⁵/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;10.8 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>13M BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(ημ⁺μ⁻)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁵⁶/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;11.2 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LEES</td><td>13M BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(K⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁵⁸/Γ

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.3 ±0.6 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.51<sup>+0.69</sup><sub>-0.60</sub> ±0.10</td><td>CHOUDHURY 21 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.1<sup>+1.5</sup><sub>-1.3</sub> ±0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT 09T</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.4<sup>+0.9</sup><sub>-0.8</sub> ±0.2</td><td>1,2 WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.9<sup>+1.6</sup><sub>-1.3</sub> ±0.3</td><td>1 AUBERT, B 06J</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.8</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>ISHIKAWA</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at T(45).

²Superseded by CHOUDHURY 21.

### Γ(K⁰e⁺e⁻)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁵⁹/Γ

Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.5<sup>+1.1</sup><sub>-0.9</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.3.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.1<sup>+1.0</sup><sub>-0.9</sub> ±0.08</td><td>CHOUDHURY 21 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.8<sup>+1.5</sup><sub>-1.2</sub> ±0.1</td><td>1 AUBERT 09T</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.0<sup>+1.4</sup><sub>-1.0</sub> ±0.1</td><td>1,2 WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.3<sup>+1.6</sup><sub>-1.1</sub> ±0.2</td><td>1 AUBERT, B 06J</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>- 2.1<sup>+2.3</sup><sub>-1.6</sub> ±0.8</td><td>1 AUBERT 03U</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 5.4</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td>ISHIKAWA</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 27</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>ABE</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by ISHIKAWA 03</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 38</td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT 02L</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 84.5</td><td>90</td><td>4</td><td>ANDERSON 01B</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 3000</td><td>90</td><td>91E</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 5200</td><td>90</td><td>5</td><td>AVERY</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²Superseded by CHOUDHURY 21.

³Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at T(45).

### Γ(K⁰νν)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁶¹/Γ

Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interaction.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>GRYGIER</td><td>17 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1,2</td><td>LEES</td><td>13I BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;19.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LUTZ</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>DEL-AMO-SA-10Q</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by LEES 13I</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

²Also reported a limit < 8.1 × 10⁻⁵ at 90% CL obtained using a fully reconstructed hadronic B-tag events.

### Γ(π⁰νν)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁶²/Γ

Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interaction.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>GRYGIER</td><td>17 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;2.08 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>LUTZ</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.4 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1</td><td>CHEN</td><td>07D BELL</td><td>Repl. by LUTZ 13</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the T(45).

### Γ(K⁰μ⁺μ⁻)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁶⁰/Γ

Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.39 ±0.35 OUR FIT</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.1.</td></tr></tbody></table>

³.39 ±0.35 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.9<sup>+1.0</sup><sub>-0.8</sub> ±0.3</td><td>CHOUDHURY 21 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.27 ±0.34 ±0.17</td><td>1 AAIJ 14M</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.9<sup>+2.9</sup><sub>-2.5</sub> ±0.3</td><td>2 AUBERT 09T</td><td>BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>3.1<sup>+0.7</sup><sub>-0.6</sub></td><td>AAIJ 12AH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14M</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>4.4<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.1</sub> ±0.3</td><td>2,3</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.9<sup>+3.3</sup><sub>-2.6</sub> ±0.7</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06J BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.63<sup>+0.82</sup><sub>-0.63</sub> ±0.14</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>03U BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT, B 06J</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.6<sup>+2.9</sup><sub>-2.3</sub> ±0.5</td><td>4</td><td>ISHIKAWA</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>Repl. by WEI 09A</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;33</td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>ABE</td><td>02 BELL</td><td>Repl. by ISHIKAWA 03</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;36</td><td>90</td><td>2</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>02L BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;66.4</td><td>90</td><td>5</td><td>ANDERSON</td><td>01B CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5200</td><td>90</td><td>91E</td><td>ARG</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3600</td><td>90</td><td>6</td><td>AVERY</td><td>87 CLEO</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Uses B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S) K⁰) = (0.928 ± 0.013 ± 0.037) × 10⁻³ for normalization.

²Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at the T(45).

³Superseded by CHOUDHURY 21.

⁴Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at T(45). The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.

⁵The result is for di-lepton masses above 0.5 GeV.

⁶AVERY 87 reports < 4.5 × 10⁻⁴ assuming the T(45) decays 40% to B⁰B⁰. We rescale to 50%.

### Γ(K*(892)⁰ℓ⁺ℓ⁻)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁶³/Γ

Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.9<sup>+1.2</sup><sub>-1.1</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>10.3<sup>+2.2</sup><sub>-2.1</sub> ±0.7</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09T BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>9.7<sup>+1.3</sup><sub>-1.1</sub> ±0.7</td><td>1</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>8.1<sup>+2.1</sup><sub>-1.9</sub> ±0.9</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT, B</td><td>06J BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09T</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>11.7<sup>+3.0</sup><sub>-2.7</sub> ±0.9</td><td>1</td><td>ISHIKAWA</td><td>03 BELL</td><td>Repl. by WEI 09A</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at T(45).

### Γ(K*(892)⁰e⁺e⁻)/Γtotal Γ⁵⁶⁴/Γ

Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-7</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10.3<sup>+1.9</sup><sub>-1.7</sub> OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>8.6<sup>+2.6</sup><sub>-2.4</sub> ±0.5</td><td>1</td><td>AUBERT</td><td>09T BABR</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>11.8<sup>+2.7</sup><sub>-2.2</sub> ±0.9</td><td>1</td><td>WEI</td><td>09A BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr></tbody></table>
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$10.4^{+3.3}_{-2.9} \pm 1.1 \quad 1 \text{ AUBERT,B} \quad 06J \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 09T}$$

$$11.1^{+5.6}_{-4.7} \pm 1.1 \quad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03U \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$$

$$< 24 \quad 90$$

$$< 64 \quad 90$$

$$< 67 \quad 90$$

$$<2900 \quad 90$$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

²Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at Υ(4S).

$$\frac{\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \mu^+ \mu^-)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{565}/\Gamma$$

Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-7}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array}$$

9.4 ±0.5 OUR FIT

9.4 ±0.6 OUR AVERAGE

$$9.04^{+0.16}_{-0.15} \pm 0.62 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 17Q \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV}$$

$$13.5^{+4.0}_{-3.7} \pm 1.0 \quad 2 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 09T \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$$

$$10.6^{+1.9}_{-1.4} \pm 0.7 \quad 2 \text{ WEI} \quad 09A \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$10.36^{+0.18}_{-0.17} \pm 0.71 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 16AO \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{Repl. by AAIJ 17Q}$$

$$8.7^{+3.8}_{-3.3} \pm 1.2 \quad 2 \text{ AUBERT,B} \quad 06J \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT 09T}$$

$$8.6^{+7.9}_{-5.8} \pm 1.1 \quad 2 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 03U \quad \text{BABR} \quad \text{Repl. by AUBERT,B 06J}$$

$$13.3^{+4.2}_{-3.7} \pm 1.1 \quad 3 \text{ ISHIKAWA} \quad 03 \quad \text{BELL} \quad \text{Repl. by WEI 09A}$$

$$<42 \quad 90$$

$$<33 \quad 90$$

$$<40 \quad 90$$

¹Uses B(B⁰ → J/ψK*(892)⁰) = (1.19 ± 0.01 ± 0.08) × 10⁻³. The second error is the total systematic uncertainty.

²Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

³Assumes equal production of B⁰ and B⁺ at Υ(4S). The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.

⁴AFFOLDER 99B measured relative to B⁰ → J/ψ(1S) K*(892)⁰.

$$\frac{\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \mu^+ \mu^-)}{\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) K^*(892)^0)} \quad \Gamma_{565}/\Gamma_{216}$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-3}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array}$$

0.75 ±0.05 OUR FIT

$$0.77 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.03 \quad \text{AALTONEN} \quad 11A1 \quad \text{CDF} \quad \text{p} \bar{p} \text{ at 1.96 TeV}$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$0.80 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.06 \quad \text{AALTONEN} \quad 11L \quad \text{CDF} \quad \text{Repl. by AALTONEN 11A1}$$

$$0.61 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.07 \quad \text{AALTONEN} \quad 09B \quad \text{CDF} \quad \text{Repl. by AALTONEN 11L}$$

$$\frac{\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \chi, \chi \to \mu^+ \mu^-)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{566}/\Gamma$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ < \sim 10^{-9} \end{array} \quad 95 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 15AZ \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV}$$

¹The limit is obtained as a function of di-muon mass. A normalizing mode branching fraction value of B(B⁰ → K*⁰μ⁺μ⁻) = (1.6 ± 0.3) × 10⁻⁷ is used.

$$\frac{\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \tau^+ \tau^-)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{567}/\Gamma$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ <3.1 \times 10^{-3} \end{array} \quad 90 \quad 1 \text{ DONG} \quad 23 \quad \text{TECN} \quad \text{COMMENT}$$

¹Uses full reconstruction of companion neutral B.

$$\frac{\Gamma(\pi^+ \pi^- \mu^+ \mu^-)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{568}/\Gamma$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-8}) \\ \text{CL\%} \end{array}$$

$$2.1 \pm 0.5 \pm 0.1 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 15S \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV}$$

¹AAIJ 15s reports (2.11 ± 0.51 ± 0.15 ± 0.16) × 10⁻⁸ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰ → π⁺π⁻μ⁺μ⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S) K*(892)⁰)] assuming B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S) K*(892)⁰) = (1.3 ± 0.1) × 10⁻³, which we rescale to our best value B(B⁰ → J/ψ(1S) K*(892)⁰) = (1.27 ± 0.05) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$\frac{\Gamma(K^*(892)^0 \nu \bar{\nu})}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{569}/\Gamma$$

Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ <1.8 \times 10^{-5} \end{array} \quad 90 \quad 1 \text{ GRYGIER} \quad 17 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

²Also reported a limit < 9.3 × 10⁻⁵ at 90% CL obtained using a fully reconstructed hadronic B-tag events.

³ADAM 96d assumes f<sub>B0</sub> = f<sub>B⁻</sub> = 0.39 and f<sub>B<sub>s</sub></sub> = 0.12.

$$\frac{\Gamma(\text{invisibl})}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{570}/\Gamma$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\ < 2.4 \end{array} \quad 90 \quad 1 \text{ LEES} \quad 12T \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹Uses the fully reconstructed B⁰ → D(*)⁻ℓ⁺ν<sub>ℓ</sub> events as a tag.

²Identified by fully reconstructing a hadronic decay of the accompanying B meson.

³Identified by fully reconstructing a hadronic decay of the accompanying B meson and requiring no other particles in the event.

$$\frac{\Gamma(\nu\bar{\nu})}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{571}/\Gamma$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-5}) \\ <1.6 \end{array} \quad 90 \quad 1 \text{ KU} \quad 20 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹Identified by fully reconstructing a hadronic decay of the accompanying B meson.

²Uses the fully reconstructed B⁰ → D(*)⁻ℓ⁺ν<sub>ℓ</sub> events as a tag.

$$\frac{\Gamma(\phi\mu^+ \mu^-)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{572}/\Gamma$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ <3.2 \times 10^{-9} \end{array} \quad 90 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 22S \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV}$$

¹Using B(B⁰<sub>S</sub> → φμ⁺μ⁻) as normalization. The limit is set for the full q² phase space.

$$\frac{\Gamma(\phi\nu\bar{\nu})}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{573}/\Gamma$$

Test for ΔB=1 weak neutral current. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interaction.

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ <1.27 \times 10^{-4} \end{array} \quad 90 \quad 1 \text{ LUTZ} \quad 13 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

$$\frac{\Gamma(e^{\pm} \mu^{\mp})}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{574}/\Gamma$$

Test of lepton family number conservation. Allowed by higher-order electroweak interactions.

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ <1.0 \times 10^{-9} \end{array} \quad 90 \quad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \quad 18T \quad \text{LHCB} \quad \text{pp at 7, 8 TeV}$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹AAIJ 18T uses normalization modes B(B⁰ → K⁺π⁻) = (19.6 ± 0.5) × 10⁻⁶ and B(B⁺ → J/ψK⁺) = (1.026 ± 0.031) × 10⁻³.

²Uses normalization mode B(B⁰ → K⁺π⁻) = (19.4 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁶.

³Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

⁴ACCIARRI 97B assume PDG 96 production fractions for B⁺, B⁰, B<sub>s</sub>, and Λ<sub>B</sub>.

⁵Paper assumes the Υ(4S) decays 43% to B⁰B<sup>0</sup>. We rescale to 50%.

⁶ALBRECHT 87D reports < 5 × 10⁻⁵ assuming the Υ(4S) decays 45% to B⁰B<sup>0</sup>. We rescale to 50%.

⁷AVERY 87 reports < 9 × 10⁻⁵ assuming the Υ(4S) decays 40% to B⁰B<sup>0</sup>. We rescale to 50%.

$$\frac{\Gamma(\pi^0 e^\pm \mu^\mp)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{575}/\Gamma$$

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ <1.4 \times 10^{-7} \end{array} \quad 90 \quad 1 \text{ AUBERT} \quad 07AG \quad \text{BABR} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$$

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).

$$\frac{\Gamma(K^0 e^\pm \mu^\mp)}{\Gamma_{\text{total}}} \quad \Gamma_{576}/\Gamma$$

Test of lepton family number conservation.

$$\begin{array}{l} \text{VALUE} \\ <3.8 \times 10^{-8} \end{array} \quad 90 \quad 1 \text{ CHOUDHURY} \quad 21 \quad \text{BELL} \quad e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

¹Assumes equal production of B⁺ and B⁰ at the Υ(4S).