$$ \Gamma(D_2^*(2460)^0 \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{45}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 0.047 \pm 0.024 \pm 0.013 \qquad 1 \text{ ACKERSTAFF} \ 97\text{W} \ \text{OPAL} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

¹ACKERSTAFF 97W assumes $B(D_2^*(2460)^0 \to D^{*+}\pi^-) = 0.21 \pm 0.04$ and $\Gamma_{b\bar{D}}/\Gamma_{\text{hadrons}} = 0.216$ at Z decay.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^- \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{46}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 0.147 \pm 0.017 \pm 0.013 \qquad 1 \text{ BUSKULIC} \ 96\text{Y} \ \text{ALEP} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

¹BUSKULIC 96Y reports $0.183 \pm 0.019 \pm 0.009$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to D_s^- \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(D_2^+ \to \phi\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(D_2^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = 0.036$, which we rescale to our best value $B(D_2^+ \to \phi\pi^+) = (4.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{47}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 0.101 \pm 0.010 \pm 0.029 \qquad 1 \text{ ABDALLAH} \ 03\text{E} \ \text{DLPH} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

¹The second error is the total of systematic uncertainties including the branching fractions used in the measurement.

$$ \Gamma(b \to \Lambda_c^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{48}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 0.078 \pm 0.011 \pm 0.003 \qquad 1 \text{ BUSKULIC} \ 96\text{Y} \ \text{ALEP} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

¹BUSKULIC 96Y reports $0.110 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.006$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(b \to \Lambda_c^+ \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+)]$ assuming $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = 0.044$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\Lambda_c^+ \to pK^-\pi^+) = (6.24 \pm 0.28) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\tau/c \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{49}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 1.162 \pm 0.032 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \qquad 1 \text{ ABBIENDI} \ 04\text{I} \ \text{OPAL} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

$$ 1.12 \pm \frac{0.11}{-0.10} \qquad 1 \text{ ABREU} \ 94\text{P} \ \text{DLPH} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

$$ 1.166 \pm 0.031 \pm 0.080 \qquad 2 \text{ ABREU} \ 93\text{J} \ \text{L3} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

$$ 1.147 \pm 0.041 \qquad 3 \text{ ABREU} \ 98\text{D} \ \text{DLPH} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

$$ 1.230 \pm 0.036 \pm 0.065 \qquad 4 \text{ BUSKULIC} \ 96\text{Y} \ \text{ALEP} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

¹Measurement performed using an inclusive identification of B mesons and the D candidates.

²Evaluated via summation of exclusive and inclusive channels.

³ABREU 98D results are extracted from a fit to the b-tagging probability distribution based on the impact parameter.

⁴BUSKULIC 96Y assumes PDG 96 production fractions for $B^0$, $B^+$, $B_S$, b baryons, and PDG 96 branching ratios for charm decays. This is sum of their inclusive $\bar{D}^0$, $D^-$, $\bar{D}_S$, and $\Lambda_c$ branching ratios, corrected to include inclusive $\Xi_c$ and charmonium.

$$ \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{50}/\Gamma $$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$) CL% EVTS

$$ 1.16 \pm 0.10 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \qquad 1 \text{ ABREU} \ 94\text{P} \ \text{DLPH} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

$$ 1.12 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.10 \qquad 1 \text{ ABREU} \ 94\text{P} \ \text{DLPH} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

$$ 1.16 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.14 \qquad 121 \text{ 2 ADRIANI} \ 93\text{J} \ \text{L3} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

$$ 1.21 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.08 \qquad 1 \text{ BUSKULIC} \ 92\text{G} \ \text{ALEP} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 1.3 \pm 0.2 \pm 0.2 \qquad 3 \text{ ADRIANI} \ 92 \ \text{L3} \ e^+e^- \to Z \\ <4.9 \qquad 90 \text{ MATTEUZZI} \ 83 \ \text{MRK2} \ E_{\text{min}}^0 = 29 \text{ GeV} $$

¹ABREU 94P is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z. Uses $J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-$ and $\mu^+\mu^-$ channels. Assumes $\Gamma(Z \to b\bar{D})/\Gamma_{\text{hadrons}}=0.22$.

²ADRIANI 93J is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z. Uses $J/\psi(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$ and $J/\psi(1S) \to e^+e^-$ channels.

³ADRIANI 92 measurement is an inclusive result for $B(Z \to J/\psi(1S)X) = (4.1 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-3}$ which is used to extract the b-hadron contribution to $J/\psi(1S)$ production.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S) \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{51}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 0.0048 \pm 0.0022 \pm 0.0010 \qquad 1 \text{ ABREU} \ 94\text{P} \ \text{DLPH} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

¹ABREU 94P is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z. Uses $\psi(2S) \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-$, $J/\psi(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$ channels. Assumes $\Gamma(Z \to b\bar{D})/\Gamma_{\text{hadrons}}=0.22$.

$$ \Gamma(\psi(2S) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{51}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 0.263 \pm 0.013 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \ 20\text{G} \ \text{LHCB} \ pp \ at \ 13 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ 0.266 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.03 \qquad 2,3 \text{ AAIJ} \ 12\text{BD} \ \text{LHCB} \ pp \ at \ 7 \text{ TeV} $$

$$ 0.257 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.019 \qquad 4,5 \text{ CHATRCHYAN} \ 12\text{AK} \ \text{CMS} \ pp \ at \ 7 \text{ TeV} $$

¹The first error is statistic; the second error is the total systematic error.

²AAIJ 12BD reports $B(b \to \psi(2S)X) = (3.08 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.36 \pm 0.27) \times 10^{-3}$ and we divided our best value of $B(b \to \psi(1S)X) = (1.16 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{-2}$ as the ratio listed here.

³Assumes lepton universality imposing $B(\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = B(\psi(2S) \to e^+e^-)$.

⁴CHATRCHYAN 12AK really reports $\Gamma_{51}/\Gamma = (3.08 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.42) \times 10^{-3}$ assuming PDG 10 value of $\Gamma_{50}/\Gamma = (1.16 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{-2}$ which we present as a ratio of $\Gamma_{51}/\Gamma_{50} = (26.5 \pm 1.0 \pm 1.1 \pm 2.8) \times 10^{-2}$.

⁵CHATRCHYAN 12AK reports $(26.5 \pm 1.0 \pm 1.1 \pm 2.8) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \psi(2S) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to J/\psi(1S) \text{ anything})] \times [B(\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-)] / [B(J/\psi(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-)]$ assuming $B(\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (7.7 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (5.93 \pm 0.06) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best values $B(\psi(2S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (8.0 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(J/\psi(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-) = (5.961 \pm 0.033) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\eta_c(1S) \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{52}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 0.32 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.08 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \ 17\text{BB} \ \text{LHCB} \ pp \ at \ 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹AAIJ 17BB reports $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \chi_{c0}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \eta_c(1S) \text{ anything})] / [B(\eta_c(1S) \to \phi\phi)] \times [B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \to \phi\phi)] = 0.147 \pm 0.023 \pm 0.011$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\eta_c(1S) \to \phi\phi) = (1.8 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \to \phi\phi) = (8.48 \pm 0.31) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{53}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 0.014 \pm 0.004 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \qquad 1 \text{ ABREU} \ 94\text{P} \ \text{DLPH} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

$$ 0.0112 \pm 0.0057 \pm 0.0004 \qquad 1 \text{ ABREU} \ 94\text{P} \ \text{DLPH} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

$$ 0.019 \pm 0.007 \pm 0.001 \qquad 19 \text{ 2 ADRIANI} \ 93\text{J} \ \text{L3} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

¹ABREU 94P reports $0.014 \pm 0.006 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.002$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \chi_{c1}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S))]$ assuming $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = 0.273 \pm 0.016$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (34.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Assumes no $\chi_{c2}(1P)$ and $\Gamma(Z \to b\bar{D})/\Gamma_{\text{hadrons}}=0.22$.

²ADRIANI 93J reports $0.024 \pm 0.009 \pm 0.002$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \chi_{c1}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S))]$ assuming $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = 0.273 \pm 0.016$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \gamma J/\psi(1S)) = (34.3 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{53}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$$ 1.92 \pm 0.82 \qquad 121 \text{ 1 ADRIANI} \ 93\text{J} \ \text{L3} \ e^+e^- \to Z $$

¹ADRIANI 93J is a ratio of inclusive measurements from b decays at the Z using only the $J/\psi(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$ channel since some systematics cancel.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\chi_{c0}(1P) \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{53}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 1.00 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.06 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \ 17\text{BB} \ \text{LHCB} \ pp \ at \ 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹AAIJ 17BB reports $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \chi_{c1}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \eta_c(1S) \text{ anything})] / [B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \to \phi\phi)] \times [B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \phi\phi)] = 0.50 \pm 0.11 \pm 0.01$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \to \phi\phi) = (8.48 \pm 0.31) \times 10^{-4}$, $B(\chi_{c1}(1P) \to \phi\phi) = (4.26 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\eta_c(1S) \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{53}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 0.31 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.08 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \ 17\text{BB} \ \text{LHCB} \ pp \ at \ 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹AAIJ 17BB reports $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \chi_{c1}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \eta_c(1S) \text{ anything})] / [B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \to \phi\phi)] \times [B(\chi_{c2}(1P) \to \phi\phi)] = 0.073 \pm 0.016 \pm 0.006$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \to \phi\phi) = (8.48 \pm 0.31) \times 10^{-4}$, $B(\chi_{c2}(1P) \to \phi\phi) = (4.26 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\chi_{c0}(1P) \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{54}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 0.39 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.03 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \ 17\text{BB} \ \text{LHCB} \ pp \ at \ 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹AAIJ 17BB reports $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \chi_{c2}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \eta_c(1S) \text{ anything})] / [B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \to \phi\phi)] \times [B(\chi_{c2}(1P) \to \phi\phi)] = 0.56 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.01$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\chi_{c0}(1P) \to \phi\phi) = (8.48 \pm 0.31) \times 10^{-4}$, $B(\chi_{c2}(1P) \to \phi\phi) = (1.23 \pm 0.07) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\eta_c(1S) \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{54}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ 0.121 \pm 0.021 \pm 0.030 \qquad 1 \text{ AAIJ} \ 17\text{BB} \ \text{LHCB} \ pp \ at \ 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$

¹AAIJ 17BB reports $[\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \chi_{c2}(1P) \text{ anything})/\Gamma(\bar{b} \to \eta_c(1S) \text{ anything})] / [B(\eta_c(1S) \to \phi\phi)] \times [B(\chi_{c2}(1P) \to \phi\phi)] = 0.081 \pm 0.013 \pm 0.005$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(\eta_c(1S) \to \phi\phi) = (1.8 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$, $B(\chi_{c2}(1P) \to \phi\phi) = (1.23 \pm 0.07) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c2}(2P) \text{ anything}, \chi_c \to \phi\phi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{55}/\Gamma $$

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

$$ <2.8 \times 10^{-7} \qquad 95 \text{ AAIJ} \ 17\text{BB} \ \text{LHCB} \ pp \ at \ 7, 8 \text{ TeV} $$
$$ \Gamma(\eta_c(1S) \text{ anything}) / \Gamma(J/\psi(1S) \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{56}/\Gamma_{50} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.48 ± 0.03 ± 0.06</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20h</td><td>LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\eta_c(2S) \text{ anything}, \eta_c \to \phi\phi) / \Gamma(\eta_c(1S) \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{57}/\Gamma_{56} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7.3 ± 2.1 ± 1.7</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17BB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 17BB reports $[\bar{\Gamma}(\bar{\phi} \to \eta_c(2S) \text{ anything}, \eta_c \to \phi\phi) / \Gamma(\bar{\Gamma}(\bar{\phi} \to \eta_c(1S) \text{ anything})] / [\Gamma(\eta_c(1S) \to \phi\phi)] = 0.040 \pm 0.011 \pm 0.004$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\eta_c(1S) \to \phi\phi) = (1.8 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c1}(3872) \text{ anything}, \chi_{c1} \to \phi\phi) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{58}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;4.5 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3915) \text{ anything}, \chi_{c0} \to \phi\phi) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{59}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.1 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>95</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17BB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Sigma}\gamma) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{60}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.11 ± 0.80 ± 0.72</td><td></td><td>1 BARATE</td><td>98i</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt; 5.4</td><td>90</td><td>2 ADAM</td><td>96d</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;12</td><td>90</td><td>3 ADRIANI</td><td>93L</td><td>L3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 BARATE 98i uses lifetime tagged Z → b ¯ b sample.

2 ADAM 96d assumes $f_{B0} = f_{B-} = 0.39$ and $f_{B_s} = 0.12$.

3 ADRIANI 93L result is for $\bar{\gamma} \to \bar{\Sigma}\gamma$ is performed inclusively.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\Sigma}\bar{\nu}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{61}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;6.4 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 BARATE</td><td>01E</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 The energy-flow and b-tagging algorithms were used.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\kappa}^{\pm} \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{62}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.74 ± 0.06 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.72 ± 0.02 ± 0.06</td><td>BARATE</td><td>98v</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.88 ± 0.05 ± 0.18</td><td>ABREU</td><td>95c</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\bar{\kappa}_s^0 \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{63}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.290 ± 0.011 ± 0.027</td><td>ABREU</td><td>95c</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^{\pm} \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{64}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.97 ± 0.02 ± 0.21</td><td>BARATE</td><td>98v</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\pi^0 \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{65}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.78 ± 0.15 ± 0.60</td><td>1 ADAM</td><td>96</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 ADAM 96 measurement obtained from a fit to the rapidity distribution of $\pi^0$s in Z → b b events.

$$ \Gamma(\phi \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{66}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.0282 ± 0.0013 ± 0.0019</td><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>00z</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\rho/\bar{\rho} \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{67}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.131 ± 0.011 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.131 ± 0.004 ± 0.011</td><td>BARATE</td><td>98v</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.141 ± 0.018 ± 0.056</td><td>ABREU</td><td>95c</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda} \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{68}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.059 ± 0.006 OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.0587 ± 0.0046 ± 0.0048</td><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97N</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.059 ± 0.007 ± 0.009</td><td>ABREU</td><td>95c</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(b\text{-baryon anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{69}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.102 ± 0.007 ± 0.027</td><td>1 BARATE</td><td>98v</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 BARATE 98v assumes $B(B_s \to pX) = 8 \pm 4\%$ and $B(b\text{-baryon} \to pX) = 58 \pm 6\%$.

$$ \Gamma(\Xi_b^+ \text{ anything}) / \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_b^0 \text{ anything}) \quad \Gamma_{71}/\Gamma_{70} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

7.3 ± 1.7 OUR AVERAGE

<table><thead><tr><th>6.7 ± 0.5 ± 2.1</th><th>1 AAIJ</th><th>19AB LHCB</th><th>pp at 7 and 8 TeV</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8.2 ± 0.7 ± 2.6</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured from $R = [B(\bar{\phi} \to \Xi_b^+) \times B(\Xi_b \to J/\psi \Xi^+)] / [B(\bar{\phi} \to \bar{\Lambda}_b^0) \times B(\bar{\Lambda}_b^0 \to J/\psi \bar{\Lambda}^0)]$ and assumes $\Xi_b^+ \to J/\psi \Xi^+ / \Gamma(\bar{\Lambda}_b^0 \to J/\psi \bar{\Lambda}^0) = 3/2$ related through SU(3) flavor symmetry.

$$ \Gamma(\text{charged anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{72}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.97 ± 0.03 ± 0.06</td><td>1 ABREU</td><td>98H</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>5.84 ± 0.04 ± 0.38</td><td>ABREU</td><td>95c</td><td>DLPH Repl. by ABREU 98H</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 ABREU 98H measurement excludes the contribution from $K^0$ and $\Lambda^0$ decay.

$$ \Gamma(\text{hadron}^+ + \text{hadron}^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{73}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.7<sup>+1.0</sup><sub>-0.7</sub> ± 0.2</td><td>1,2 BUSKULIC</td><td>96v</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 BUSKULIC 96v assumes PDG 96 production fractions for $B^0$, $B^+$, $B_s$, baryons.

2 Average branching fraction of weakly decaying B hadrons into two long-lived charged hadrons, weighted by their production cross section and lifetimes.

$$ \Gamma(\text{charmless}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{74}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.007 ± 0.021</td><td>1 ABREU</td><td>98D</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 ABREU 98D results are extracted from a fit to the b-tagging probability distribution based on the impact parameter. The expected hidden charm contribution of 0.026 ± 0.004 has been subtracted.

$$ \Gamma(\mu^{+} \mu^{-} \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{76}/\Gamma $$

Test for $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>90</td><td>ABBOTT</td><td>98B</td><td>D0 p&#773;/p 1.8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;5.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>90</td><td>1 ALBAJAR</td><td>91C</td><td>UA1 E<sup>+</sup> p&#773;/E<sup>-</sup> = 630 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.02</td><td>95</td><td>ALTHOFF</td><td>84G</td><td>TASS E<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> = 34.5 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.007</td><td>95</td><td>ADEVA</td><td>83</td><td>MRKJ E<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> = 30-38 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.007</td><td>95</td><td>BARTEL</td><td>83B</td><td>JADE E<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> = 33-37 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Both ABBOTT 98B and GLENN 98 claim that the efficiency quoted in ALBAJAR 91C was overestimated by a large factor.

$$ [\Gamma(e^+ e^- \text{ anything}) + \Gamma(\mu^+ \mu^- \text{ anything})] / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad (\Gamma_{75} + \Gamma_{76})/\Gamma $$

Test for $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.008</td><td>90</td><td>MATTEUZZI</td><td>83</td><td>MRK2 E<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> = 29 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(\nu\bar{\nu} \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \quad \Gamma_{77}/\Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>&lt;3.9 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>1 GROSSMAN</td><td>96</td><td>RVUE e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

1 GROSSMAN 96 limit is derived from the ALEPH BUSKULIC 95 limit $B(B^+ \to \tau^+ \nu_\tau)$ < 1.8 × 10⁻³ at CL=90% using conservative simplifying assumptions.

## $\chi_b$ AT HIGH ENERGY

$\chi_b$ is the average $B-\bar{B}$ mixing parameter at high-energy $\chi_b = f'_d \chi_d + f'_s \chi_s$ where $f'_d$ and $f'_s$ are the fractions of $B^0$ and $B_s^0$ hadrons in an unbiased sample of semileptonic b-hadron decays. We consider here $\bar{\chi}$ for hadrons produced in Z decays.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>12.59 ± 0.42 OUR EVALUATION</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(from SCHAEL 06d, eq. 5.39)</td></tr></tbody></table>

12.6 ± 0.4 OUR AVERAGE

<table><tbody><tr><td>13.12 ± 0.49 ± 0.42</td><td>1 ABBIENDI</td><td>03p</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>12.7 ± 1.3 ± 0.6</td><td>2 ABREU</td><td>01l</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>11.92 ± 0.68 ± 0.51</td><td>3 ACCIARRI</td><td>99d</td><td>L3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>12.1 ± 1.6 ± 0.6</td><td>4 ABREU</td><td>94J</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>11.4 ± 1.4 ± 0.8</td><td>5 BUSKULIC</td><td>94G</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>12.9 ± 2.2</td><td>6 BUSKULIC</td><td>92B</td><td>Alep e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>13.2 ± 0.1 ± 2.4</td><td>7 ABAZOV</td><td>06s</td><td>D0 p&#773;/p at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>15.2 ± 0.7 ± 1.1</td><td>8 ACOSTA</td><td>04A</td><td>CDF p&#773;/p at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>13.1 ± 2.0 ± 1.6</td><td>9 ABE</td><td>97i</td><td>CDF Repl. by ACOSTA 04A</td></tr><tr><td>11.07 ± 0.62 ± 0.55</td><td>10 ALEXANDER</td><td>96</td><td>OPAL Rep. by ABBIENDI 03P</td></tr><tr><td>13.6 ± 3.7 ± 4.0</td><td>11 UENO</td><td>96</td><td>AMY e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> at 57.9 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>14.4 ± 1.4 ± 1.7</td><td>12 ABREU</td><td>94f</td><td>DLPH Sup. by ABREU 94J</td></tr><tr><td>13.1 ± 1.4</td><td>13 ABREU</td><td>94J</td><td>DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>13.2 ± 1.2 ± 0.8</td><td>14 ACCIARRI</td><td>94d</td><td>L3 Repl. by ACCIARRI 99D</td></tr><tr><td>15.7 ± 2.0 ± 3.2</td><td>14 ALBAJAR</td><td>94</td><td>UA1 $\sqrt{s}$ = 630 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>12.1 ± 4.4 ± 1.7</td><td>15 ABREU</td><td>1665</td><td>DLPH Sup. by ABREU 94J</td></tr><tr><td>14.3 ± 2.2 ± 0.7</td><td>16 AKERS</td><td>93B</td><td>OPAL Sup. by ALEXANDER 96</td></tr><tr><td>14.5 ± 4.1 ± 1.8</td><td>17 ACTON</td><td>92c</td><td>OPAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## $B^{\pm}/B^0/B_s^0$/b-baryon ADMIXTURE

<table><tbody><tr><td>12.1 ± 1.7 ± 0.6</td><td rowspan="3">1112</td><td>18 ADEVA</td><td>92C</td><td>L3</td><td>Sup. by ACCIARRI 94D</td></tr><tr><td>17.6 ± 3.1 ± 3.2</td><td>19 ABE</td><td>91G</td><td>CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>14.8 ± 2.9 ± 1.7</td><td>20 ALBAJAR</td><td>91D</td><td>UA1</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">p</span> 630 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>13.2 ± 22.0 ± 1.5<br/>-1.2</td><td rowspan="2">823</td><td>21 DECAMP</td><td>91</td><td>ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>17.8 ± 4.9<br/>-4.0 ± 2.0</td><td>22 ADEVA</td><td>90P</td><td>L3</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>17 ± 15<br/>-8</td><td rowspan="2">23,24 WEIR</td><td></td><td>90</td><td>MRK2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> 29 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>21 ± 29<br/>-15</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>23 BAND</td><td>88</td><td>MAC</td><td>E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 29 GeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>23 BAND</td><td>88</td><td>MAC</td><td>E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 29 GeV</td></tr><tr><td>&gt;2 at 90%CL</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>12.1 ± 4.7</td><td>23,25 ALBAJAR</td><td>87C</td><td>UA1</td><td>Repl. by ALBAJAR 91D</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;12 at 90%CL</td><td>23,26 SCHAAD</td><td>85</td><td>MRK2</td><td>E<sup>ee</sup><sub>cm</sub> = 29 GeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. The average B mixing parameter is determined simultaneously with b and c forward-backward asymmetries in the fit.

2. The experimental systematic and model uncertainties are combined in quadrature.

3. ACCIARRI 99D uses maximum-likelihood fits to extract $\chi_D$ as well as the $A^b_{FB}$ in $Z \to b\bar{b}$ events containing prompt leptons.

4. This ABREU 94J result is from 5182 $\ell\ell$ and 279 $\Lambda\ell$ events. The systematic error includes 0.004 for model dependence.

5. BUSKULIC 94G data analyzed using $ee$, $e\mu$, and $\mu\mu$ events.

6. BUSKULIC 92B uses a jet charge technique combined with electrons and muons.

7. Uses the dimuon charge asymmetry. Averaged over the mix of b-flavored hadrons.

8. Measurement performed using events containing a dimuon or an $e/\mu$ pair.

9. Uses di-muon events.

10. ALEXANDER 96 uses a maximum likelihood fit to simultaneously extract $\chi$ as well as the forward-backward asymmetries in $e^+e^- \to Z \to b\bar{b}$ and $c\bar{c}$.

11. UENO 96 extracted $\chi$ from the energy dependence of the forward-backward asymmetry.

12. ABREU 94f uses the average electric charge sum of the jets recolliding against a b-quark jet tagged by a high $p_T$ muon. The result is for $\bar{\chi} = f_d \chi_d + 0.96 f_s \chi_s$.

13. This ABREU 94j result combines $\ell\ell$, $\Lambda\ell$, and jet-charge $\ell$ (ABREU 94F) analyses. It is for $\bar{\chi} = f_d \chi_d + 0.96 f_s \chi_s$.

14. ALBAJAR 94 uses dimuon events. Not independent of ALBAJAR 91D.

15. ABREU 93c data analyzed using $ee$, $e\mu$, and $\mu\mu$ events.

16. AKERS 93b analysis performed using dilepton events.

17. ACTON 92c uses electrons and muons. Superseded by AKERS 93b.

18. ADEVA 92c uses electrons and muons.

19. ABE 916 measurement of $\chi$ is done with $e\mu$ and $ee$ events.

20. ALBAJAR 91d measurement of $\chi$ is done with dimuons.

21. DECAMP 91 done with opposite and like-sign dileptons. Superseded by BUSKULIC 92B.

22. ADEVA 92c measurement uses $ee$, $\mu\mu$, and $e\mu$ events from 118k events at the Z. Superseded by ADEVA 92c.

23. These experiments are not in the average because the combination of $B_s$ and $B_d$ mesons which they see could differ from those at higher energy.

24. The WEIR 90 measurement supersedes the limit obtained in SCHAAD 85. The 90% CL are 0.06 and 0.38.

25. ALBAJAR 87c measured $\chi = (\bar{\mathcal{B}}^0 \to B^0 \to \mu^+\chi)$ divided by the average production weighted semileptonic branching fraction for B hadrons at 546 and 630 GeV.

26. Limit is average probability for hadron containing B quark to produce a positive lepton.

## CP VIOLATION PARAMETERS IN semileptonic b-hadron decays.

### Re($\epsilon_b$) / (1 + $|\epsilon_b|^2$)

CP impurity in semileptonic b-hadron decays.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>• • •</td><td></td><td></td><td>We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>-6.2 ± 5.2 ± 4.7</td><td>1 AABOUD</td><td>17E</td><td>ATLS pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-1.24 ± 0.38 ± 0.18</td><td>2 ABAZOV</td><td>14</td><td>D0 p<span style="text-decoration: overline">b</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>-1.97 ± 0.43 ± 0.23</td><td>3 ABAZOV</td><td>11U</td><td>D0 Repl. by ABAZOV 14</td></tr><tr><td>-2.39 ± 0.63 ± 0.37</td><td>4 ABAZOV</td><td>10H</td><td>D0 Repl. by ABAZOV 11U</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. AABOUD 17E reports a measurement of charge asymmetry of $A^b_{SL} = (-25 \pm 21 \pm 19) \times 10^{-3}$ in lepton + jets $t\bar{t}$ events in which a b-hadron decays semileptonically to a soft muon.

2. ABAZOV 14 reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of $A^b_{SL} = (-4.96 \pm 1.53 \pm 0.72) \times 10^{-3}$ in semileptonic b-hadron decays.

3. ABAZOV 11U reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of $A^b_{SL} = (-7.87 \pm 1.72 \pm 0.93) \times 10^{-3}$ in semileptonic b-hadron decays.

4. ABAZOV 10H reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of $A^b_{SL} = (-9.57 \pm 2.51 \pm 1.46) \times 10^{-3}$ in semileptonic b-hadron decays. Using the measured production ratio of $B^0_d$ and $B^0_s$, and the asymmetry of $B^0_d A^b_{SL} = (-4.7 \pm 4.6) \times 10^{-3}$ measured from B-factories, they obtain the asymmetry for $B^0_s$ as $A^b_{SL} = (-14.6 \pm 7.5) \times 10^{-3}$.

## B-HADRON PRODUCTION FRACTIONS IN $p\bar{p}$ COLLISIONS AT Tevatron

The production fractions for b-hadrons in $p\bar{p}$ collisions at the Tevatron have been calculated from the best values of mean lifetimes, mixing parameters, and branching fractions in this edition by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV) (see https://hflav.web.cern.ch/).

The values reported below assume:

$$f(\bar{b} \to B^+) = f(\bar{b} \to B^0)$$

$$f(\bar{b} \to B^+) + f(\bar{b} \to B^0) + f(\bar{b} \to B^0_s) + f(b \to b\text{-baryon}) = 1$$

The values are:

$$f(\bar{b} \to B^+) = f(\bar{b} \to B^0) = 0.344 \pm 0.021$$

$$f(\bar{b} \to B^0_s) = 0.115 \pm 0.013$$

$$f(b \to b\text{-baryon}) = 0.198 \pm 0.046$$

$$f(\bar{b} \to B^0_s) / f(\bar{b} \to B^0_g) = 0.334 \pm 0.041$$

and their correlation coefficients are:

$$\text{cor}(B^0_s, \text{b-baryon}) = -0.429$$

$$\text{cor}(B^0_s, B^+ = B^0) = +0.159$$

$$\text{cor}(\text{b-baryon}, B^+ = B^0) = -0.960$$

as obtained with the Tevatron average of time-integrated mixing parameter

$$\bar{\chi} = 0.147 \pm 0.011.$$

## PRODUCTION ASYMMETRIES

### $A^b_C \bar{b}_D$

$$A^b_C \bar{b}_D = [N(\Delta y > 0) - N(\Delta y < 0)] / [N(\Delta y > 0) + N(\Delta y < 0)] \text{ with } \Delta y = |y_b| - |y_D|$$

where $y_b/\bar{b}$ is rapidity of b or $\bar{b}$ quarks.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4">Average is meaningless.</td></tr><tr><td>0.4 ± 0.4 ± 0.3</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14AS LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.0 ± 0.9 ± 0.6</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>14AS LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.6 ± 1.7 ± 0.6</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>14AS LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">1 Measured for 40 &lt; M(b<span style="text-decoration: overline">b</span>) &lt; 75 GeV/c<sup>2</sup>.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">2 Measured for 75 &lt; M(b<span style="text-decoration: overline">b</span>) &lt; 105 GeV/c<sup>2</sup>.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">3 Measured for M(b<span style="text-decoration: overline">b</span>) &gt; 105 GeV/c<sup>2</sup>.</td></tr></tbody></table>

## $B^0/B^0_s$/b-baryon ADMIXTURE REFERENCES

<table><tbody><tr><td>AAU</td><td>21Y</td><td>PR D104 003205</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAU</td><td>20G</td><td>EPJ C80 185</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAU</td><td>20V</td><td>PR 124 122002</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAU</td><td>19AB</td><td>PR D99 052006</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAU</td><td>19AD</td><td>PR D100 031102</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAU</td><td>19AI</td><td>PR D100 112006</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AABOUD</td><td>17E</td><td>PR D52 071</td><td>M. Aboud et al.</td><td>(ATLAS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAU</td><td>17BB</td><td>EPJ C77 609</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAD</td><td>15CM</td><td>PR L15 262001</td><td>G. Aad et al.</td><td>(ATLAS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAU</td><td>14AS</td><td>PR L13 082003</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>14</td><td>PR D89 012002</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAU</td><td>13B</td><td>EPJ C130 001</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAU</td><td>12BD</td><td>EPJ C72 2100</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">Also</td></tr><tr><td>AAU</td><td>12J</td><td>PR D85 032008</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>CHATRCHYAN</td><td>12AK</td><td>JHEP 1202 011</td><td>S. Chatrchyan et al.</td><td>(CMS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AAU</td><td>11F</td><td>PR L07 211801</td><td>R. Aaij et al.</td><td>(LHCb Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>11U</td><td>PR D84 052007</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>10H</td><td>PR L05 081801</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>Also</td><td>10</td><td>PR D82 032001</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PDG</td><td>10J</td><td>PR G37 075021</td><td>K. Nakamura et al.</td><td>(PDG Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>09E</td><td>PR D79 032001</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AALTONEN</td><td>08N</td><td>PR D77 02003</td><td>T. Aaltonen et al.</td><td>(SDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>06S</td><td>PR D74 092001</td><td>V.M. Abazov et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABAZOV</td><td>06D</td><td>PRPL 427 257</td><td>S. Schael et al.</td><td>(LEP, SLD Collabs. and EWWG)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>04I</td><td>EPJ C35 149</td><td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABDALLAH</td><td>04E</td><td>EPJ C33 307</td><td>J. Abdallah et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACOSTA</td><td>04A</td><td>PR D69 012002</td><td>D. Acosta et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>03M</td><td>EPJ C30 467</td><td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>03P</td><td>PL B577 18</td><td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>03E</td><td>PL B561 26</td><td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABDALLAH</td><td>03K</td><td>PL B576 29</td><td>J. Abdallah et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HEISTER</td><td>02G</td><td>EPJ C22 613</td><td>A. Heister et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>01R</td><td>EPJ C21 399</td><td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>01R</td><td>EPJ C20 455</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARATE</td><td>01E</td><td>EPJ C19 213</td><td>R. Barate et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>00E</td><td>EPJ C13 225</td><td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>00Z</td><td>PL B492 13</td><td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>00</td><td>EPJ C12 225</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>00C</td><td>PL B496 43</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>00D</td><td>PL B478 14</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>00R</td><td>PL B475 407</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>00E</td><td>EPJ C13 47</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AFFOLDER</td><td>00E</td><td>PL B84 1663</td><td>T. Affolder et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBIENDI</td><td>99J</td><td>EPJ C12 609</td><td>G. Abbiendi et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>99P</td><td>PR D60 092005</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>99D</td><td>PR B448 152</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARATE</td><td>99G</td><td>EPJ C6 555</td><td>R. Barate et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABBOTT</td><td>98B</td><td>PL B423 419</td><td>B. Abbott et al.</td><td>(D0 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>98B</td><td>PR D57 5382</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>98D</td><td>PL B426 193</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>98H</td><td>PL B425 399</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>98</td><td>PL B416 220</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>98H</td><td>PL B364 174</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>98E</td><td>EPJ C1 439</td><td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARATE</td><td>98I</td><td>PL B429 169</td><td>R. Barate et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARATE</td><td>98Q</td><td>EPJ C4 387</td><td>R. Barate et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARATE</td><td>98V</td><td>EPJ C5 205</td><td>R. Barate et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>GLENN</td><td>98L</td><td>PL 80 2289</td><td>S. Glenn et al.</td><td>(CLEO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>97E</td><td>PR D55 2546</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97F</td><td>ZPHY C73 397</td><td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97N</td><td>ZPHY C74 423</td><td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97W</td><td>ZPHY C76 425</td><td>K. Ackerstaff et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>96E</td><td>PL B377 195</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>96E</td><td>EPJ C71 379</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADAM</td><td>96</td><td>ZPHY C69 561</td><td>W. Adam et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADAM</td><td>96D</td><td>ZPHY C72 207</td><td>W. Adam et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>96</td><td>ZPHY C70 357</td><td>G. Alexander et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96F</td><td>PL B369 151</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96V</td><td>PL B384 471</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96Y</td><td>PL B388 648</td><td>D. Buskulic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>GROSSMAN</td><td>96</td><td>NP C465 369</td><td>Y. Grossman, Z. Ligeti, E. Nardi</td><td>(REHO, CIT)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">Also</td></tr><tr><td>PDG</td><td>96</td><td>PR D54 1</td><td>R. M. Barnett et al.</td><td>(PDG Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>UENO</td><td>96</td><td>PL B381 365</td><td>K. Ueno et al.</td><td>(AMY Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE.K</td><td>96</td><td>SLD 75 3624</td><td>K. Aebi et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE.C</td><td>95C</td><td>PL B347 447</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>95D</td><td>ZPHY C66 323</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr></tbody></table>
$B^{\pm}/B^{0}/B^{0}_{S}/b$-baryon ADMIXTURE, $V_{cb}$ and $V_{ub}$ CKM Matrix Elements

<table><tr><td>ADAM</td><td>95</td><td>ZPHY C68 363</td><td>W. Adam et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AKERS</td><td>95Q</td><td>ZPHY C67 57</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>95Q</td><td>PL B343 444</td><td>D. Buskullic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>94F</td><td>PL B322 459</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>94F</td><td>PL B332 488</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>94L</td><td>ZPHY C63 3</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>94P</td><td>PL B341 109</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>94C</td><td>PL B332 201</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACCIARRI</td><td>94D</td><td>PL B335 542</td><td>M. Acciarri et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALBAJAR</td><td>94E</td><td>ZPHY C61 41</td><td>C. Albaraj et al.</td><td>(UA1 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>94G</td><td>ZPHY C62 179</td><td>D. Buskullic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>93E</td><td>PL B313 288</td><td>K. Abe et al.</td><td>(VENUS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>93J</td><td>PL 71 3421</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>93C</td><td>PL B301 145</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>93D</td><td>ZPHY C57 181</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>93G</td><td>PL B312 253</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACTON</td><td>93C</td><td>PL B307 247</td><td>P.D. Acton et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACTON</td><td>93J</td><td>ZPHY C60 217</td><td>P.D. Acton et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADRIANI</td><td>93J</td><td>PL B317 467</td><td>O. Adriani et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADRIANI</td><td>93K</td><td>PL B317 474</td><td>O. Adriani et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADRIANI</td><td>93L</td><td>PL B317 637</td><td>O. Adriani et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AKERS</td><td>93B</td><td>ZPHY C60 199</td><td>R. Akers et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>93B</td><td>PL B298 479</td><td>D. Buskullic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>93O</td><td>PL B314 459</td><td>D. Buskullic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABREU</td><td>92</td><td>ZPHY C53 567</td><td>P. Abreu et al.</td><td>(DELPHI Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACTON</td><td>92</td><td>PL B274 513</td><td>D.P. Acton et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ACTON</td><td>92C</td><td>PL B276 379</td><td>D.P. Acton et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADEVA</td><td>92C</td><td>PL B288 395</td><td>B. Adeva et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADEVA</td><td>92</td><td>PL B281 412</td><td>A. Adriani et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>92B</td><td>PL B284 177</td><td>D. Buskullic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>92F</td><td>PL B295 174</td><td>D. Buskullic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>92G</td><td>PL B295 396</td><td>D. Buskullic et al.</td><td>(ALEPH Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ABE</td><td>91G</td><td>PRL 67 3351</td><td>F. Abe et al.</td><td>(CDF Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADEVA</td><td>91C</td><td>B. Adeva et al.</td><td>B. Adeva et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADEVA</td><td>91H</td><td>PL B270 111</td><td>B. Adeva et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALBAJAR</td><td>91C</td><td>PL B262 163</td><td>C. Albaraj et al.</td><td>(UA1 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALBAJAR</td><td>91D</td><td>PL B262 171</td><td>C. Albaraj et al.</td><td>(UA1 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALEXANDER</td><td>91G</td><td>PL B266 485</td><td>G. Alexander et al.</td><td>(OPAL Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DECAMP</td><td>91</td><td>PL B258 236</td><td>D. Decamp et al.</td><td>(DELCO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>DECAMP</td><td>91C</td><td>PL B257 492</td><td>D. Decamp et al.</td><td>(DELCO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADEVA</td><td>90D</td><td>PL B252 703</td><td>B. Adeva et al.</td><td>(L3 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BEHREND</td><td>90P</td><td>ZPHY C47 333</td><td>H.J. Behrend et al.</td><td>(CELLO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>HAGEMANN</td><td>90</td><td>ZPHY C48 401</td><td>J. Hagemann et al.</td><td>(JADE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>LYONS</td><td>90</td><td>PR D41 982</td><td>L. Lyons, A.J. Martin, D.H. Saxon</td><td>(OXF, BRIS+)</td></tr><tr><td>WEIR</td><td>90</td><td>PL B240 289</td><td>A.J. Weir et al.</td><td>(Mark II Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BRAUNSCH...</td><td>89B</td><td>ZPHY C44 1</td><td>R. Braunschweig et al.</td><td>TASSO Collab.</td></tr><tr><td>ONG</td><td>89</td><td>PRL 62 1236</td><td>R.A. Ong et al.</td><td>(Mark II Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BAND</td><td>88</td><td>PL B200 221</td><td>H.R. Band et al.</td><td>(MAC Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>KLEM</td><td>88</td><td>PR D37 41</td><td>D.E. Klem et al.</td><td>(DELCO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ONG</td><td>88</td><td>PRL 60 2587</td><td>R.A. Ong et al.</td><td>(Mark II Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALBAJAR</td><td>87C</td><td>PL B186 247</td><td>C. Albaraj et al.</td><td>(UA1 Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ASH</td><td>87</td><td>PRL 58 640</td><td>W.W. Ash et al.</td><td>(MAC Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARTEL</td><td>87</td><td>ZPHY C33 339</td><td>W. Bartel et al.</td><td>(JADE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BROM</td><td>87</td><td>PL P195 301</td><td>J.M. Brom et al.</td><td>(HRS Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>PAL</td><td>86</td><td>PL D33 2708</td><td>T. Pal et al.</td><td>(DELCO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>AIHARA</td><td>85</td><td>ZPHY C27 39</td><td>H. Aihara et al.</td><td>(TPC Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARTEL</td><td>85J</td><td>PL 163B 277</td><td>W. Bartel et al.</td><td>(JADE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>SCHAAD</td><td>85</td><td>PL 160B 188</td><td>T. Schaad et al.</td><td>(Mark II Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALTHOFF</td><td>84G</td><td>ZPHY C22 219</td><td>M. Althoff et al.</td><td>(TASSO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ALTHOFF</td><td>84J</td><td>PL 146B 443</td><td>M. Althoff et al.</td><td>(TASSO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>KOOP</td><td>84</td><td>PL B52 970</td><td>D.E. Koop et al.</td><td>(DELCO Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADEVA</td><td>83</td><td>PRL 50 799</td><td>B. Adeva et al.</td><td>(Mark-J Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>ADEVA</td><td>83B</td><td>PRL 51 443</td><td>B. Adeva et al.</td><td>(Mark-J Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>BARTEL</td><td>83B</td><td>PL 132B 241</td><td>W. Bartel et al.</td><td>(JADE Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>FERNANDEZ</td><td>83D</td><td>PRL 50 2054</td><td>E. Fernandez et al.</td><td>(MAC Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>MATTEUZZI</td><td>83</td><td>PL 129B 141</td><td>C. Matteuzzi et al.</td><td>(Mark II Collab.)</td></tr><tr><td>NELSON</td><td>83</td><td>PRL 50 1542</td><td>M.E. Nelson et al.</td><td>(Mark II Collab.)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>3.92 ±0.18 ±0.23</td><td>5 ABDALLAH</td><td>04D</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>4.31 ±0.13 ±0.18</td><td>6 ADAM</td><td>03</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.55 ±0.14 <sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.24</sub></td><td>7 ABREU</td><td>01H</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>3.71 ±0.18 ±0.20</td><td>8 ABIENDI</td><td>00Q</td><td>OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>3.19 ±0.10 ±0.19</td><td>9 BUSKULIC</td><td>97</td><td>ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>3.483 ±0.015 ±0.056</td><td>3 WAHEED</td><td>19</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by WAHEED 21</td></tr><tr><td>3.46 ±0.02 ±0.10</td><td>10 DUNGEL</td><td>10</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by WAHEED 19</td></tr><tr><td>3.59 ±0.06 ±0.14</td><td>11 AUBERT</td><td>08AT</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09A</td></tr><tr><td>3.44 ±0.03 ±0.11</td><td>12 AUBERT</td><td>08R</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 09A</td></tr><tr><td>3.55 ±0.03 ±0.16</td><td>13 AUBERT</td><td>05E</td><td>BABR</td><td>Repl. by AUBERT 08R</td></tr><tr><td>3.77 ±0.11 ±0.19</td><td>14 ABDALLAH</td><td>04D</td><td>DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3.54 ±0.19 ±0.18</td><td>15 ABE</td><td>02F</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by DUNGEL 10</td></tr><tr><td>4.31 ±0.13 ±0.18</td><td>16 BRIERE</td><td>02</td><td>CLE2</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(4S)</td></tr><tr><td>3.28 ±0.19 ±0.22</td><td>ACKERSTAFF</td><td>97G</td><td>OPAL</td><td>Repl. by ABIENDI 00Q</td></tr><tr><td>3.50 ±0.19 ±0.23</td><td>17 ABREU</td><td>96P</td><td>DLPH</td><td>Repl. by ABREU 01H</td></tr><tr><td>3.51 ±0.19 ±0.20</td><td>18 BARISH</td><td>95</td><td>CLE2</td><td>Repl. by ADAM 03</td></tr><tr><td>3.14 ±0.23 ±0.25</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>95N</td><td>ALEP</td><td>Repl. by BUSKULIC 97</td></tr></table>

1. Measured from differential shapes of exclusive $B \to D^*\ell^-\nu_\ell$ ($\ell = e$ or $\mu$) decays. Using CNL form factor parametrization and the zero-recoil lattice QCD point $F(1) = 0.906 \pm 0.013$ ADACHI 23J finds $|V_{cb}|_{CNL} = (40.57 \pm 0.31 \pm 0.95 \pm 0.58) \times 10^{-3}$ where the last uncertainty is due to the prediction of $F(1)$. Also reports a measurement of $|V_{cb}|_{BGL} = (40.13 \pm 0.27 \pm 0.93 \pm 0.58) \times 10^{-3}$ using BGL form factors parametrization.

2. Measured from differential shapes of exclusive $B \to D^*\ell^-\nu_\ell$ decays with hadronic tag-side reconstruction and extracting the CNL and BGL form factor parameters. PRIM 23 finds $|V_{cb}|_{CNL} = (40.2 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-3}$ with the zero-recoil lattice QCD point $F(1) = 0.906 \pm 0.013$. PRIM 23 provides also a measurement of $|V_{cb}|_{BGL} = (40.7 \pm 1.0) \times 10^{-3}$.

3. WAHEED 21 uses fully reconstructed $D^{*-\ell+\nu}$ events ($\ell = e$ or $\mu$) and $\nu_{EW} = 1.0066$.

4. Obtained from a global fit to $B \to D^*(\ell)\nu_\ell$ events, with reconstructed $D^0\ell$ and $D^+\ell$ final states and $\rho^2 = 1.22 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.07$.

5. Measurement using fully reconstructed $D^*$ sample with a $\rho^2 = 1.32 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.33$.

6. Average of the $B^0 \to D^*(\ell^-\ell^+)\nu$ and $B^+ \to D^*(\ell^-\ell^+)\nu$ modes with $\rho^2 = 1.61 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.21$ and $f_{\ell\pm} = 0.521 \pm 0.012$.

7. ABREU 01H measured using about 5000 partial reconstructed $D^*$ sample with a $\rho^2 = 1.34 \pm 0.14^{+0.24}_{-0.22}$.

8. ABIENDI 00q: measured using both inclusively and exclusively reconstructed $D^*\pm$ samples with a $\rho^2 = 1.21 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.20$. The statistical and systematic correlations between $|V_{cb}| \times F(1)$ and $\rho^2$ are 0.90 and 0.54 respectively.

9. BUSKULIC 97: measured using exclusively reconstructed $D^*\pm$ with a $a^2 = 0.31 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.08$. The statistical correlation is 0.92.

10. Measurement using fully reconstructed $D^*$ sample with a $\rho^2 = 1.29 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.27$.

11. Measured using the dependence of $B^- \to D^0 e^- \tau^0 e^-$ decay differential rate and the form factor description by CAPRINI 98 with $\rho^2 = 1.16 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.08$.

12. Measured using fully reconstructed $D^*$ sample and a simultaneous fit to the Caprini-Lellouch-Neubert form factor parameters: $\rho^2 = 1.191 \pm 0.048 \pm 0.028$, $R_1(1) = 1.429 \pm 0.061 \pm 0.044$, and $R_2(1) = 0.827 \pm 0.038 \pm 0.022$.

13. Measurement using fully reconstructed $D^*$ sample with a $\rho^2 = 1.29 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.27$.

14. Combines with previous partial reconstructed $D^*$ measurement with a $\rho^2 = 1.39 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.33$.

15. Measured using exclusive $B^0 \to D^*(892) \pm e^+\nu$ decays with $\rho^2 = 1.35 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.19$ and a correlation of 0.91.

16. BRIERE 02 result is based on the same analysis and data sample reported in ADAM 03.

17. ABREU 96P: measured using both inclusively and exclusively reconstructed $D^*\pm$ samples.

18. BARISH 95: measured using both exclusive reconstructed $B^0 \to D^*\ell^-\nu$ and $B^+ \to D^*\ell^+\nu$ samples. They report their experiment's uncertainties $\pm 0.0019 \pm 0.0018 \pm 0.0008$, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty in the lifetimes. We combine the last two in quadrature.

## $V_{cb}$ and $V_{ub}$ CKM Matrix Elements

OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE

See the related review(s):

Semileptonic B Hadron Decays, Determination of $V_{cb}$ and $V_{ub}$

### $V_{cb}$ MEASUREMENTS

For the discussion of $V_{cb}$ measurements, which is not repeated here, see the review on "Determination of $|V_{cb}|$ and $|V_{ub}|$."

The CKM matrix element $|V_{cb}|$ can be determined by studying the rate of the semileptonic decay $B \to D^*(\ell^-\ell^+)\nu$ as a function of the recoil kinematics of $D^*(\ell^-\ell^+)\nu$ mesons. Taking advantage of theoretical constraints on the normalization and a linear $\omega$ dependence of the form factors ($F(\omega)$, $G(\omega)$) provided by Heavy Quark Effective Theory (HQET), the $|V_{cb}| \times F(\omega)$ and $\rho^2$ can be simultaneously extracted from data, where $\omega$ is the scalar product of the two-meson four velocities, $F(1)$ is the form factor at zero recoil ($\omega=1$) and $\rho^2$ is the slope. Using the theoretical input of $F(1)$, a value of $|V_{cb}|$ can be obtained.

$$|V_{cb}| \times F(1) \text{ (from } B^0 \to D^*\ell^+\nu\text{)}$$

$$\text{VALUE (units } 10^{-2}) \qquad \text{DOCUMENT ID} \qquad \text{TECN} \qquad \text{COMMENT}$$

**3.534 ±0.037** OUR EVALUATION (Produced by HFLAV) with $\rho^2=1.139 \pm 0.020$ and a correlation 0.268. The fitted $\chi^2$ is 63.2 for 27 degrees of freedom.

**3.60 ±0.06** OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.5. See the ideogram below.

$$3.676 \pm 0.028 \pm 0.086$$

$$3.64 \pm 0.09$$

$$3.506 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.056$$

$$3.59 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.12$$

1. ADACHI 23J BELL $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$

2. PRIM 23 BELL $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$

3. WAHEED 21 BELL $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$

4. AUBERT 09A BABR $e^+e^- \to T(4S)$

### WEIGHTED AVERAGE
3.60±0.06 (Error scaled by 1.5)

<figure><img src="image_635.png" /></figure>

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

(Confidence Level = 0.024)
$$|V_{cb}| \times G(1) \text{ (from } B \to D^- \ell^+ \nu)$$

VALUE (units $10^{-2}$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

**4.121 ±0.100 OUR EVALUATION** (Produced by HFLAV) with $\rho^2=1.128 \pm 0.033$ and a correlation 0.747. The fitted $\chi^2$ is 4.8 for 8 degrees of freedom.

**4.22 ±0.10 OUR AVERAGE**

4.229 ±0.137

4.23 ±0.19 ±0.14

4.31 ±0.08 ±0.23

4.16 ±0.47 ±0.37

2.78 ±0.68 ±0.65

1 GLATTAUER 16 BELL $e^+e^- \to \gamma(45)$

2 AUBERT 10 BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma(45)$

3 AUBERT 09A BABR $e^+e^- \to \gamma(45)$

4 BARTELT 99 CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \gamma(45)$

5 BUSKULIC 97 ALEP $e^+e^- \to Z$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

4.11 ±0.44 ±0.52

6 ABE 02E BELL Repl. by GLATTAUER 16

3.37 ±0.44 $^{+0.72}_{-0.49}$

7 ATHANAS 97 CLE2 Repl. by BARTELT 99

1 Obtained from a fit to the combined partially reconstructed $B \to \overline{D} \ell \nu_{\ell} \nu$ sample while tagged by the other fully reconstructed B meson in the event. Also reports fitted $\rho^2 = 1.09 \pm 0.05$.

2 Obtained from a fit to the combined $B \to \overline{D} \ell^+ \nu_{\ell} \nu$ sample in which a hadronic decay of the second B meson is fully reconstructed and $\rho^2 = 1.20 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.04$.

3 Obtained from a global fit to $B \to D^(*) \ell \nu_{\ell} \nu$ events, with reconstructed $D^0 \ell$ and $D^+ \ell$ final states and $\rho^2 = 1.20 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.07$.

4 BARTELT 99: measured using both exclusive reconstructed $B^0 \to D^- \ell^+ \nu$ and $B^+ \to D^0 \ell^+ \nu$ samples.

5 BUSKULIC 97: measured using exclusively reconstructed $D^\pm$ with a $\rho^2 = -0.05 \pm 0.53 \pm 0.38$. The statistical correlation is 0.99.

6 Using the missing energy and momentum to extract kinematic information about the undetected neutrino in the $B^0 \to D^- \ell^+ \nu$ decay.

7 ATHANAS 97: measured using both exclusive reconstructed $B^0 \to D^- \ell^+ \nu$ and $B^+ \to D^0 \ell^+ \nu$ samples with a $\rho^2 = 0.59 \pm 0.22 \pm 0.12^{+0.59}_{-0.0012}$. They report their experiment's uncertainties $\pm 0.0044 \pm 0.0048^{+0.0053}_{-0.0012}$, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the form factor model variations. We combine the last two in quadrature.

$$|V_{cb}| \text{ (from } D_s^* - \mu^+ \nu_\mu)$$

VALUE (units $10^{-3}$)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

**41.4 ±0.6 ±0.9 ±1.2**

1 AAIJ 20E LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1 Measured from an inclusive sample of $D_s^* - \mu^+ \nu_\mu$ candidates using CNL parameterization of the form factor. AAIJ 20E provides also measurement of $|V_{cb}| = (42.3 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.9 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-3}$ using BGL parameterization of the form factor. The third uncertainty is due to the external inputs used in the measurement.

## $V_{ub}$ MEASUREMENTS

For the discussion of $V_{ub}$ measurements, which is not repeated here, see the review on "Determination of $|V_{cb}|$ and $|V_{ub}|$."

The CKM matrix element $|V_{ub}|$ can be determined by studying the rate of the charmless semileptonic decay $b \to u \ell \nu$. The relevant branching ratio measurements based on exclusive and inclusive decays can be found in the B Listings, and are not repeated here.

## $V_{cb}$ and $V_{ub}$ CKM Matrix Elements REFERENCES

ADACHI 23J PR D108 092013
PRIM 23 PR D108 012002
WAHEED 21 PR D103 079901
AAIJ 20E PR D101 072004
WAHEED 19 PR D100 052007
GLATTAUER 16 PR D93 032006
AUBERT 10 PRL 104 011802
DUNGEL 10 PR D82 112007
AUBERT 09A PR D79 012002
AUBERT 08AT PRL 100 231803
AUBERT 08R PR D77 032002
AUBERT 05E PR D71 051502
ABDALLAH 04D EPJ C33 213
ADAM 03 PR D67 032001
ABE 02E PL B526 258
ABE 02F PL B526 247
BRIERE 02 PRL 89 081803
ABREU 01H PL B510 55
ABBIENDI 00Q PL B482 15
BARTELT 99 PRL 82 3746
CAPRINI 98 NP B530 153
ACKERSTAFF 97G PL B395 128
ATHANAS 97 PRL 79 2208
BUSKULIC 97 PRL B395 373
ABREU 96P ZPHY C71 539
BARIISH 95 PRL D51 1014
BUSKULIC 95N PL B359 236

I. Adachi et al. (BELLE II Collab.)
M.T. Prim et al. (BELLE Collab.)
E. Waheed et al. (BELLE Collab.)
R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)
E. Waheed et al. (BELLE Collab.)
R. Glattauer et al. (BELLE Collab.)
B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.)
W. Dungel et al. (BELLE Collab.)
B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.)
B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.)
B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.)
B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.)
J. Abdallah et al. (DELPHI Collab.)
N.E. Adam et al. (CLEO Collab.)
K. Abe et al. (BELLE Collab.)
K. Abe et al. (BELLE Collab.)
R. Briere et al. (CLEO Collab.)
P. Abreu et al. (DELPHI Collab.)
G. Abbiendi et al. (OPAL Collab.)
J. Bartelt et al. (CLEO Collab.)
I. Caprioli, L. Lellouch, M. Neubert (BCIP, CERN)
K. Ackerman et al. (OPAL Collab.)
M. Athanas et al. (CLEO Collab.)
D. Buskulic et al. (ALEPH Collab.)
P. Abreu et al. (DELPHI Collab.)
B.C. Barish et al. (CLEO Collab.)
D. Buskulic et al. (ALEPH Collab.)

$$B^*$$

$$I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(1^-)$$

I, J, P need confirmation.

Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions.

## $B^*$ MASS

From mass difference below and the average of our B masses $(m_{B^\pm + m_{B^0}})/2$.

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

**5324.75 ±0.20 OUR FIT**

$$m_{B^*} - m_B$$

VALUE (MeV)

EVTS

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

**45.18 ±0.20 OUR FIT**

**45.42 ±0.26 OUR AVERAGE** Includes data from the datablock that follows this one.

46.2 ±0.3 ±0.8

1 ACKERSTAFF 97M OPAL $e^+e^- \to Z$

45.3 ±0.35 ±0.87

1 BUSKULIC 96D Alep $E_{cm}^{ee} = 88-94$ GeV

45.5 ±0.3 ±0.8

1 ABREU 95R DLPH $E_{cm}^{ee} = 88-94$ GeV

46.3 ±1.9

1 ACCIARRI 95B L3 $E_{cm}^{ee} = 88-94$ GeV

46.4 ±0.3 ±0.8

2 AKERIB 91 CLE2 $e^+e^- \to \gamma X$

45.6 ±0.8

2 WU 91 CSB2 $e^+e^- \to \gamma X, \gamma \ell X$

45.4 ±1.0

3 LEE-FRANZINI 190 CSB2 $e^+e^- \to \gamma(5S)$

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

52 ±2 ±4

4 HAN 85 CUSB $e^+e^- \to \gamma e X$

1 $u, d, s$ flavor averaged.

2 These papers report $E_s$ in the $B^*$ center of mass. The $m_{B^*} - m_B$ is 0.2 MeV higher.

$E_{cm} = 10.61-10.7$ GeV. Admixture of $B^0$ and $B^+$ mesons, but not $B_S$.

3 LEE-FRANZINI 90 value is for an admixture of $B^0$ and $B^+$. They measure $46.7 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.2$ MeV for an admixture of $B^0$, $B^+$, and $B_S$, and use the shape of the photon line to separate the above value.

4 HAN 85 is for $E_{cm} = 10.6-11.2$ GeV, giving an admixture of $B^0$, $B^+$, and $B_S$.

$$m_{B^*} - m_{B^+}$$

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock.

**45.34 ±0.20 OUR FIT**

**45.01 ±0.30 ±0.23**

5 AAIJ 130 LHCB pp at 7 TeV

5 Obtained the mass difference between $B^{*+} K^-$ and $B^+ K^-$ from $B_{S2}^{*}(5840)^0$ decay.

$$(m_{B^{*+}} - m_{B^{+}}) - (m_{B^{*0}} - m_{B^{0}})$$

VALUE (MeV)

CL%

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

<6

95

ABREU 95R

DLPH $E_{cm}^{ee} = 88-94$ GeV

$$m_{B^{*0}} - m_{B^{+}}$$

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

**0.91 ±0.24 ±0.09**

6 SIRUNYAN 18DF CMS pp at 8 TeV

6 Uses exclusively reconstructed final states containing a $J/\psi \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay.

## $B^*$ DECAY MODES

Mode

Fraction ($\Gamma_f/\Gamma$)

$$\Gamma_1 B^\gamma$$

seen

## $B^*$ REFERENCES

SIRUNYAN 18DF EPJ C78 939
AAIJ 130 PRL 110 151803
ACKERSTAFF 97M ZPHY C74 413
BUSKULIC 96D ZPHY C69 393
ABREU 95R ZPHY C68 353
ACCIARRI 95B PL B345 589
AKERIB 91 PRL 67 1692
WU 91 PL B273 177
J. Lee-Franzini et al. (CUSB II Collab.)
HAN 85 PRL 55 36

A.M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collab.)
R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collab.)
K. Ackerman et al. (OPAL Collab.)
D. Buskulic et al. (ALEPH Collab.)
P. Abreu et al. (DELPHI Collab.)
M. Acciarri et al. (L3 Collab.)
D.S. Akerib et al. (CLEO Collab.)
Q.W. Wu et al. (CUSB II Collab.)
J. Lee-Franzini et al. (CUSB II Collab.)
K. Han et al. (COLU, LSU, MPIM, STON)
$B_1(5721)$

$I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(1^+)$

I, J, P need confirmation.

Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions.

## $B_1(5721)$ MASS

### $B_1(5721)^+$ mass

OUR FIT uses $m_{B^+0}$ and $m_{B_1^+} - m_{B^+0}$ to determine $m_{B_1(5721)^+}$.

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

5726.0$^{+2.5}_{-2.7}$ OUR FIT

### $m_{B_1^+} - m_{B^+0}$

VALUE (MeV)

EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

401.2$^{+2.4}_{-2.7}$ OUR FIT

401.2$^{+2.4}_{-2.7}$ OUR AVERAGE

$400.5 \pm 1.8 \pm 3.1 \quad 8k$

1 AAIJ 15AB LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$402 \pm 3 \quad \frac{+1}{-3}$

2 AALTONEN 14I

CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

1. AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_1^+} - m_{B^0}] - (m_{B^+0} - m_{B^0}) - m_{\pi^+} = 260.9 \pm 1.8 \pm 3.1$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^+$ mass and assume $(m_{B^+0} - m_{B^0}) = (m_{B_1^+} - m_{B^+0}) = 45.01 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.23$ MeV. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event.

2. AALTONEN 14I reports $m_{B_1(5721)^+} - m_{B^+0} - m_{\pi^+} = 262.3 \pm 3^{+1}_{-3}$ MeV which we adjusted by the $\pi^+$ mass.

### $B_1(5721)^0$ mass

OUR FIT uses mass differences measurements listed below to determine the mass $m_{B_1(5721)^0}$.

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

5726.1$\pm$1.2 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

### $m_{B_1^0} - m_{B^+}$

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

446.7$\pm$1.2 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

441.5$\pm$2.4$\pm$1.3

1 ABAZOV 07T D0

$p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$446.2 \pm 1.9 \pm 1.0 \quad \frac{+1}{-1}$

1 AALTONEN 09D

CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 14I

1. Observed in $B_1^0 \to B^+\pi^-$.

### $m_{B_1^0} - m_{B^+}$

VALUE (MeV)

EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

401.4$\pm$1.2 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

402.8$\pm$1.1 OUR AVERAGE

$403.4 \pm 0.7 \pm 1.5 \quad 35k$

1 AAIJ 15AB LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$402.3 \pm 0.9 \pm 1.1 \quad \frac{+1}{-2}$

2 AALTONEN 14I

CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

1. AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_1^0} - m_{B^+}] - (m_{B^+} - m_{B^0}) - m_{\pi^-} = 263.9 \pm 0.7 \pm 1.4$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^-$ mass and $(m_{B^+} - m_{B^0}) = 45.01 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.23$ MeV. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event.

2. AALTONEN 14I reports $m_{B_1(5721)^0} - m_{B^+} - m_{\pi^-} = 262.7 \pm 0.9^{+1.1}_{-1.2}$ MeV which we adjusted by the $\pi^-$ mass.

## $B_1(5721)$ WIDTH

### $B_1(5721)^+$ width

VALUE (MeV)

EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

31 $\pm$ 6 OUR AVERAGE Error

Includes scale factor of 1.1.

$29.1 \pm 3.6 \pm 4.3 \quad 8k$

AAIJ 15AB LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$49 \pm 12 \pm 2 \quad \frac{+1}{-10}$

AALTONEN 14I

CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

### $B_1(5721)^0$ width

VALUE (MeV)

EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

27.5$\pm$3.4 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

$30.1 \pm 1.5 \pm 3.5 \quad 35k$

AAIJ 15AB LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$23 \pm 3 \pm 4$

AALTONEN 14I

CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

## $B_1(5721)$ DECAY MODES

Mode

Fraction ($\Gamma_i/\Gamma$)

$\Gamma_1 \quad B^*\pi$

seen

### $\Gamma(B^*\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_1/\Gamma$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

CHG

COMMENT

seen

AAIJ 15AB LHCB

$\pm 0$ pp at 7, 8 TeV

seen

AALTONEN 14I

$\pm 0$ $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

seen

AALTONEN 09D

$\pm 0$ $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

seen

1 ABAZOV 07T D0

$\pm 0$ $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

1. Observed in $B_1^0 \to B^+\pi^-$ with $B^+ \to B^+\gamma$ and $B^+ \to J/\psi\pi^+$.

## $B_1(5721)$ REFERENCES

AAIJ

15AB JHEP 1504 024

R. Aaij et al.

(LHCb Collab.)

AALTONEN

14I PR D90 012013

T. Aaltonen et al.

(CDF Collab.)

AALTONEN

09D PRL 102 102003

T. Aaltonen et al.

(CDF Collab.)

ABAZOV

07T PRL 99 172001

V.M. Abazov et al.

(D0 Collab.)

$B_j^*(5732)$

$I(J^P) = ?(??)$

OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE

Signal can be interpreted as stemming from several narrow and broad resonances.

## $B_j^*(5732)$ MASS

VALUE (MeV)

EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

5698 $\pm$ 8 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2.

$5710 \pm 20$

1 AFFOLDER 01F

CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.8 TeV

$5695 \pm 17 \quad \frac{+1}{-19}$

2 BARATE 98L

ALEP $e^+e^- \to Z$

$5704 \pm 4 \pm 10$

3 BUSKULIC 96D

ALEP $E_{cm}^e = 88-94$ GeV

$5732 \pm 5 \pm 20$

ABREU 95B

DLPH $E_{cm}^e = 88-94$ GeV

$5681 \pm 11$

AKERS 95E

OPAL $E_{cm}^e = 88-94$ GeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$5713 \pm 2$

4 ACCIARRI 99N

L3 $e^+e^- \to Z$

1. AFFOLDER 01F uses the reconstructed B meson through semileptonic decay channels. The fraction of light B mesons that are produced at $L=1$ B$^{**}$ states is measured to be $0.28 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.03$.

2. BARATE 98L uses fully reconstructed B mesons to search for $B^{**}$ production in the $B^+\pi^+$ system. In the framework of heavy quark symmetry (HQS), they also measured the mass of $B_2^*$ to be $5739^{+8}_{-11} \pm 6$ MeV/c$^2$ and the relative production rate of $B(b \to B_2^* \to B^*(\pi^-)B(b \to B, u,d)) = (31 \pm 9^{+6}_{-5})\%$.

3. Using $m_{B^+} - m_B = 424 \pm 4 \pm 10$ MeV.

4. ACCIARRI 99N uses inclusive reconstructed B mesons to search for $B^{**}$ production in the $B^*(\pi^+)\pi^-$ system. In the framework of HQET, they measured the mass of $B_1^+$ and $B_2^*$ to be $5670 \pm 10 \pm 13$ MeV and $5768 \pm 5 \pm 6$ with the $B(b \to B^{**}) = (32 \pm 3 \pm 6) \times 10^{-2}$. They also reported the evidence for the existence of an excited B-meson state or mixture of states in the region $5.9-6.0$ GeV.

## $B_j^*(5732)$ WIDTH

VALUE (MeV)

EVTS

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

128$\pm$18 OUR AVERAGE

$145 \pm 28$

ABREU 95B

DLPH $E_{cm}^e = 88-94$ GeV

$116 \pm 24$

AKERS 95E

OPAL $E_{cm}^e = 88-94$ GeV

## $B_j^*(5732)$ DECAY MODES

Mode

Fraction ($\Gamma_i/\Gamma$)

$\Gamma_1 \quad B^*\pi + B\pi$

seen

$\Gamma_2 \quad B^*\pi(X)$

[a] (85$\pm$29) %

[a] X refers to decay modes with or without additional accompanying decay particles.

## $B_j^*(5732)$ BRANCHING RATIOS

X refers to decay modes with or without additional accompanying decay particles.

### $\Gamma(B^*\pi(X))/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_2/\Gamma$

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$0.85 \pm 0.26 \quad \frac{+1.2}{-0.27}$

ABBIENDI 02E

OPAL $e^+e^- \to Z$

## $B_j^*(5732)$ REFERENCES

ABBIENDI

02E EPJ C23 437

G. Abbiendi et al.

(OPAL Collab.)

AFFOLDER

01F PR D64 072002

T. Affolder et al.

(CDF Collab.)

ACCIARRI

99N PL B465 323

M. Acclarri et al.

(L3 Collab.)

BARATE

98L PL B425 215

R. Barate et al.

(ALEPH Collab.)

BUSKULIC

96D ZPHY C69 393

D. Buskulic et al.

(ALEPH Collab.)

ABREU

95B PL B345 598

P. Abreu et al.

(DELPHI Collab.)

AKERS

95E ZPHY C66 19

R. Akers et al.

(OPAL Collab.)
# Meson Particle Listings

## $B_2^*(5747)$, $B_J(5840)$

$B_2^*(5747)$

$I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(2^+)$

I, J, P need confirmation.

Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions.

### $B_2^*(5747)$ MASS

$B_2^*(5747)^+ \text{ mass}$

OUR FIT uses $m_{B^0}$ and $m_{B_2^+} - m_{B^0}$ to determine $m_{B_2^*(5747)^+}$.

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

5737.3 $\pm 0.7$ OUR FIT

$m_{B_2^+} - m_{B^0}$

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

457.5 $\pm 0.7$ OUR FIT

457.5 $\pm 0.7$ OUR AVERAGE

$457.62 \pm 0.72 \pm 0.40$

1

AAIJ

15AB LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$457.3 \pm 1.3 \pm 0.3$

2

AALTONEN

14I

CDF

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

1 AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_2^+} - m_{B^0}] - m_{\pi^+} = 318.1 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.4$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^+$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event.

2 AALTONEN 14I reports $m_{B_2^*(5747)^+} - m_{B^0} - m_{\pi^+} = 317.7 \pm 1.2^{+0.3}_{-0.9}$ MeV which we adjusted by the $\pi^+$ mass.

$B_2^*(5747)^0 \text{ mass}$

OUR FIT uses $m_{B^+}$, $m_{B^0}$, $m_{B^+}$, and mass differences below to determine $m_{B_2^*(5747)^0}$. The $-0.659$ correlation between statistical uncertainties of $m_{B_1^0}$ and $m_{B_2^*}$ and $m_{B_2^*}$ and $m_{B_1^0}$ measurements reported by ABAZOV 07T is taken into account.

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

5739.6 $\pm 0.7$ OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.4.

$m_{B_2^0} - m_{B_1^0}$

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

13.5 $\pm 1.4$ OUR FIT

Error includes scale factor of 1.3.

26.2 $\pm 3.1 \pm 0.9$

1

ABAZOV

07T

D0

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$14.9 \pm 2.2 \pm 1.2$

1

AALTONEN

09D

CDF

Repl. by AALTONEN 14I

1 Observed in $B_2^* \to B^{*+} \pi^-$ and $B_2^* \to B^{+} \pi^-$.

$m_{B_2^0} - m_{B^+}$

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

460.2 $\pm 0.6$ OUR FIT

Error includes scale factor of 1.4.

459.9 $\pm 0.8$ OUR AVERAGE

Error includes scale factor of 1.8.

$460.18 \pm 0.37 \pm 0.33$

1

AAIJ

15AB LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$457.5 \pm 1.2 \pm 0.8$

2

AALTONEN

14I

CDF

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

1 AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_2^0} - m_{B^+}] - m_{\pi^-} = 320.6 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.3$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^-$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event.

2 AALTONEN 14I reports $m_{B_2^*(5747)^0} - m_{B^+} - m_{\pi^-} = 317.9 \pm 1.2^{+0.8}_{-0.9}$ MeV which we adjusted by the $\pi^-$ mass.

### $B_2^*(5747)$ WIDTH

$B_2^*(5747)^+ \text{ width}$

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

20 $\pm 5$ OUR AVERAGE

Error includes scale factor of 2.2.

$23.6 \pm 2.0 \pm 2.1$

4k

AAIJ

15AB LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$11 \pm 4 \pm 3$

AALTONEN

14I

CDF

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

$B_2^*(5747)^0 \text{ width}$

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

24.2 $\pm 1.7$ OUR AVERAGE

$24.5 \pm 1.0 \pm 1.5$

17k

15AB LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

$22 \pm 3 \pm 4$

AALTONEN

14I

CDF

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

$22.7 \pm 3.8 \pm 3.2$

AALTONEN

09D

CDF

Repl. by AALTONEN 14I

### $B_2^*(5747)$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> Bπ</td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> B*π</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(B\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{1}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>CHG</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>4k,17k</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>±0</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14I</td><td>CDF</td><td>±</td><td>p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>09D</td><td>CDF</td><td>0</td><td>p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td></td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>07T</td><td>D0</td><td>0</td><td>p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(B^*\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

$\Gamma_{2}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>CHG</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>4k,17k</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>±0</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td></td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>09D</td><td>CDF</td><td>0</td><td>p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td></td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>07T</td><td>D0</td><td>0</td><td>p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(B^*\pi)/\Gamma(B\pi)$

$\Gamma_{2}/\Gamma_{1}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>CHG</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.84 $\pm 0.27$ OUR AVERAGE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.71 $\pm 0.14 \pm 0.30$</td><td>17k</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>0</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.0 $\pm 0.5 \pm 0.8$</td><td>4k</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>±</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.10 $\pm 0.42 \pm 0.31$</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>07T</td><td>D0</td><td>p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Converted from measured ratio of $R = B(B_2^* \to B^{*+} \pi^-) / B(B_2^* \to B^{(*)+} \pi^-) = 0.475 \pm 0.095 \pm 0.069$.

### $B_2^*(5747)$ REFERENCES

AAIJ

15AB JHEP 1504 024

R. Aaij et al.

(LHCb Collab.)

AALTONEN

14I PR D90 012013

T. Aaltonen et al.

(CDF Collab.)

AALTONEN

09D PRL 102 102003

T. Aaltonen et al.

(CDF Collab.)

ABAZOV

07T PRL 99 172001

V.M. Abazov et al.

(D0 Collab.)

$B_J(5840)$

$I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(2^?)$

I, J, P need confirmation.

### OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE

Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions.

### $B_J(5840)$ MASS

$B_J(5840)^+ \text{ MASS}$

OUR FIT uses $m_{B^0}$ and $m_{B_J(5840)^+} - m_{B^0}$ to determine $m_{B_J(5840)^+}$.

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

5851 $\pm 19$ OUR FIT

$m_{B_J(5840)^+} - m_{B^0}$

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

COMMENT

571 $\pm 19$ OUR FIT

571 $\pm 13 \pm 14$

1

AAIJ

15AB LHCB

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

595 $\pm 26 \pm 14$

1

AAIJ

15AB LHCB

1 AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_1^+} - m_{B^0}] - m_{\pi^+} = 431 \pm 13 \pm 14$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^+$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$ and uses two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

2 AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_1^+} - m_{B^0}] - m_{\pi^+} = 455 \pm 26 \pm 14$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^+$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$ and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

$m_{B_J(5840)^+} - m_{B^0}$

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

COMMENT

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

565 $\pm 15 \pm 14$

1

AAIJ

15AB LHCB

1 AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_1^+} - m_{B^0}] - (m_{B^{*+}} - m_{B^+}) - m_{\pi^+} = 425 \pm 15 \pm 14$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^+$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$, $(m_{B^{*+}} - m_{B^0}) = (m_{B^{*+}} - m_{B^+}) = 45.01 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.23$ MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

$B_J(5840)^0 \text{ MASS}$

OUR FIT uses $m_{B^+}$ and $m_{B_J(5840)^0} - m_{B^0}$ to determine $m_{B_J(5840)^0}$.

VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

COMMENT

5863 $\pm 9$ OUR FIT
$m_{B_j(5840)^0} - m_{B^+}$

VALUE (MeV) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

584 ± 9 OUR FIT

584 ± 5 ±7 12k

1 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

610 ±22 ±7 12k

2 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_j^0} - m_{B^+}] - m_{\pi^-} = 444 \pm 5 \pm 7$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^-$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$ and uses two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

² AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_j^0} - m_{B^+}] - m_{\pi^-} = 471 \pm 22 \pm 7$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^-$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$ and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

$m_{B_j(5840)^0} - m_{B^+}$

VALUE (MeV) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

584 ±5 ±7 12k

1 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_j^0} - m_{B^+}] - (m_{B^{++}} - m_{B^+}) - m_{\pi^-} = 444 \pm 5 \pm 7$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^-$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$, $(m_{B^{++}} - m_{B^+}) = 45.01 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.23$ MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

B<sub>J</sub>(5840) WIDTH

$B_{J(5840)^+} \text{ WIDTH}$

VALUE (MeV) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

224 ±24 ±80 7k

1 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

215 ±27 ±80 7k

2 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

229 ±27 ±80 7k

3 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ Assuming $P = (-1)^J$ and using two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

² Assuming $P = (-1)^J$ and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

³ Assuming $P = (-1)^J$ and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

$B_{J(5840)^0} \text{ WIDTH}$

VALUE (MeV) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

127 ±17 ±34 12k

1 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

107 ±20 ±34 12k

2 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

119 ±17 ±34 12k

3 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ Assuming $P = (-1)^J$ and using two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

² Assuming $P = (-1)^J$ and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

³ Assuming $P = (-1)^J$ and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

B<sub>J</sub>(5840) DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>j</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> B<sup>*</sup>π</td><td>seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> Bπ</td><td>possibly seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

B<sub>J</sub>(5840) BRANCHING RATIOS

$\Gamma(B^*\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>7k</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>12k</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>CHG</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>±</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>0</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma(B\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>possibly seen</td><td>7k</td></tr><tr><td>possibly seen</td><td>1 AAIJ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>CHG</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>±</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>0</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ A Bπ decay is forbidden from a $P = (-1)^J$ parent, whereas $B^*\pi$ is allowed.

B<sub>J</sub>(5840) REFERENCES

AAIJ 15AB JHEP 1504 024

R. Aaij et al.

(LHCb Collab.)

$B_{J(5970)}$

$I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(?\ddot{?})$

I, J, P need confirmation.

Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions.

B<sub>J</sub>(5970) MASS

$B_{J(5970)^+} \text{ MASS}$

OUR FIT uses $m_{B^0}$ and $m_{B_{J(5970)^+} - m_{B^0}}$ to determine $m_{B_{J(5970)^+}}$.

VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID

5965 ±5 OUR FIT

$m_{B_{J(5970)^+} - m_{B^0}}$

VALUE (MeV) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

685 ±5 OUR FIT

685 ±5 OUR AVERAGE

685.3 ±4.1 ± 2.5 2k

1 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

681 ±5 ±12 1.4k

2 AALTONEN 14I CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

686.8 ±4.5 ± 2.5 2k

3 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_j^+} - m_{B^0}] - m_{\pi^+} = 545.8 \pm 4.1 \pm 2.5$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^+$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$ and uses two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

² AALTONEN 14I reports $m_{B_{J(5970)^+} - m_{B^0} - m_{\pi^+}} = 541 \pm 5 \pm 12$ MeV which we adjusted by the $\pi^+$ mass.

³ AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_j^+} - m_{B^0}] - m_{\pi^+} = 547 \pm 5 \pm 3$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^+$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$ and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

$m_{B_{J(5970)^+} - m_{B^0}}$

VALUE (MeV) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

686.0 ±4.0 ± 2.5 2k

1 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_j^+} - m_{B^0}] - (m_{B^{++}} + m_{B^+}) - m_{\pi^+} = 547 \pm 4 \pm 3$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^+$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$, $(m_{B^{++}} - m_{B^+}) = (m_{B^{++}} - m_{B^+}) = 45.01 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.23$ MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

$B_{J(5970)^0} \text{ MASS}$

OUR FIT uses $m_{B^+}$ and $m_{B_{J(5970)^0} - m_{B^+}}$ to determine $m_{B_{J(5970)^0}}$.

VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID

5971 ±5 OUR FIT

$m_{B_{J(5970)^0} - m_{B^+}}$

VALUE (MeV) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

691 ±5 OUR FIT

691 ±5 OUR AVERAGE

689.9 ±2.9 ± 5.1 10k

1 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

698 ±5 ±12 2.6k

2 AALTONEN 14I CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

714.3 ±6.4 ± 5.1 10k

3 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_j^0} - m_{B^+}] - m_{\pi^-} = 550.4 \pm 2.9 \pm 5.1$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^-$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$ and uses two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

² AALTONEN 14I reports $m_{B_{J(5970)^0} - m_{B^+} - m_{\pi^-}} = 558 \pm 5 \pm 12$ MeV which we adjusted by the $\pi^-$ mass.

³ AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_j^0} - m_{B^+}] - m_{\pi^-} = 575 \pm 6 \pm 5$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^-$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$ and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

$m_{B_{J(5970)^0} - m_{B^+}}$

VALUE (MeV) EVTS

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

691.6 ±3.7 ± 5.1 10k

1 AAIJ 15AB LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

¹ AAIJ 15AB reports $[m_{B_j^0} - m_{B^+}] - (m_{B^{++}} - m_{B^+}) - m_{\pi^-} = 552 \pm 4 \pm 5$ MeV which we adjust by the $\pi^-$ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes $P = (-1)^J$, $(m_{B^{++}} - m_{B^+}) = 45.01 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.23$ MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.
$B_J(5970)$ WIDTH

$B_J(5970)^+ \text{ WIDTH}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>62±20 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>63±15±17</td><td>2k</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>60<sup>+30</sup><sub>-20</sub>±40</td><td>1.4k</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14I CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">P</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>61±14±17</td><td>2k</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>61±15±17</td><td>2k</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹Assuming $P = (-1)^J$ and using two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

²Assuming $P = (-1)^J$ and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

³Assuming $P = -(-1)^J$ and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

$B_J(5970)^0 \text{ WIDTH}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>81±12 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>82±8±9</td><td>10k</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>70<sup>+30</sup><sub>-20</sub>±30</td><td>2.6k</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14I CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">P</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>56±7±9</td><td>10k</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>82±10±9</td><td>10k</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

¹Assuming $P = (-1)^J$ and using two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

²Assuming $P = (-1)^J$ and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

³Assuming $P = -(-1)^J$ and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.

$B_J(5970)$ DECAY MODES

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>f</sub>/Γ)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub></td><td>Bπ</td><td>possibly seen</td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub></td><td>B*π</td><td>seen</td></tr></tbody></table>

$B_J(5970)$ BRANCHING RATIOS

$\Gamma(B\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>CHG</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>possibly seen</td><td>2k</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>±</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>possibly seen</td><td>10k</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>0</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td><strong>possibly seen</strong></td><td>2.6k</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14I CDF</td><td>0</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">P</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td><strong>possibly seen</strong></td><td>1.4k</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14I CDF</td><td>±</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">P</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹A $B\pi$ decay is forbidden from a $P = -(-1)^J$ parent, whereas $B^*\pi$ is allowed.

$\Gamma(B^*\pi)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>CHG</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>seen</td><td>10k</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>0</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>2k</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15AB LHCB</td><td>±</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td><strong>seen</strong></td><td>2.6k</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14I CDF</td><td>0</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">P</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td><strong>seen</strong></td><td>1.4k</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>14I CDF</td><td>±</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline;">P</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$\Gamma_1/\Gamma$

$\Gamma_2/\Gamma$

$B_J(5970)$ REFERENCES

AAIJ
AALTONEN

15AB JHEP 1504 024
14I PR D90 012013

R. Aaij et al.
T. Aaltonen et al.

(LHCb Collab.)
(CDF Collab.)
## BOTTOM, STRANGE MESONS
($B = \pm 1, S = \mp 1$)

$B_s^0 = s\bar{b}, \bar{B}_s^0 = \bar{s}b$, similarly for $B_s^*s$

$B_s^0$

$I(J^P) = 0(0^{-})$

I, J, P need confirmation. Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions.

### $B_s^0$ MASS

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>5366.93 ± 0.10 OUR FIT</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>5366.91 ± 0.11 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>5366.98 ± 0.07 ± 0.13</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21C LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5366.85 ± 0.19 ± 0.13</td><td>2</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>19U LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5366.83 ± 0.25 ± 0.27</td><td>3</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>18AC LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5367.08 ± 0.38 ± 0.15</td><td>4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16U LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5366.90 ± 0.28 ± 0.23</td><td>5</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5364.4 ± 1.3 ± 0.7</td><td></td><td>LOUVOT</td><td>09 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr><tr><td>5366.01 ± 0.73 ± 0.33</td><td>6</td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>06 CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">T</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5369.9 ± 2.3 ± 1.3</td><td>32</td><td>7 ABE</td><td>96B CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">T</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>5374 ± 16 ± 2</td><td>3</td><td>ABREU</td><td>94D DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>5359 ± 19 ± 7</td><td>1</td><td>7 AKERS</td><td>94J OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>5368.6 ± 5.6 ± 1.5</td><td>2</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>93G ALEC</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</td></tr><tr><td>5370 ± 1 ± 3</td><td></td><td>DRUTSKOY</td><td>07A BELL</td><td>Repl. by LOUVOT 09</td></tr><tr><td>5370 ± 40</td><td>6</td><td>8 AKERS</td><td>94J OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>5383.3 ± 4.5 ± 5.0</td><td>14</td><td>ABE</td><td>93F CDF</td><td>Repl. by ABE 96B</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Uses $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-K^+K^-$ decays.

2. Uses $B_s^0 \to J/\psi p\bar{p}$ decays.

3. Uses $B_s \to \chi_{c1}K^+K^-$ mode.

4. Uses $J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-, \phi \to K^+K^-$ decays, and observes 128 ± 13 events of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi\phi$.

5. Uses $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ fully reconstructed decays.

6. Uses exclusively reconstructed final states containing a $J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-$ decays.

7. From the decay $B_s \to J/\psi(1S)\phi$.

8. From the decay $B_s \to D_s^-\pi^+$.

### $m_{B_s^0} - m_B$

$m_B$ is the average of our B masses ($m_{B^+} + m_{B^0}$)/2.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (MeV)</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>87.37 ± 0.12 OUR FIT</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>87.42 ± 0.24 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>87.60 ± 0.44 ± 0.09</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15U LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>87.42 ± 0.30 ± 0.09</td><td>2</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>86.64 ± 0.80 ± 0.08</td><td>3</td><td>ACOSTA</td><td>06 CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">T</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We use the following data for averages but not for fits. • • •

<table><tr><td>89.7 ± 2.7 ± 1.2</td><td>ABE</td><td>96B CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">T</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>80 to 130</td><td>68</td><td>LEE-FRANZINI</td><td>90 CSB</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr></table>

1. The reported result is $m_{B_s^0} - m_{B^0} = 87.45 \pm 0.44 \pm 0.09$ MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of $(m_{B^+} + m_{B^0})/2$. Uses the mode $B_s^0 \to \psi(2S)K^-\pi^+$.

2. The reported result is $m_{B_s^0} - m_{B^+} = 87.52 \pm 0.30 \pm 0.12$ MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of $(m_{B^+} + m_{B^0})/2$.

3. The reported result is $m_{B_s^0} - m_{B^0} = 86.38 \pm 0.90 \pm 0.06$ MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of $(m_{B^+} + m_{B^0})/2$.

### $m_{B_s^0 H} - m_{B_s^0 L}$

See the $B_s^0 - \bar{B}_s^0$ MIXING section near the end of these $B_s^0$ Listings.

### $B_s^0$ MEAN LIFE

The mean $B_s^0$ lifetime is defined and computed as $1/\Gamma_{B_s^0}$, where $\Gamma_{B_s^0}$ is the average decay width of the $B_s^0$ mass eigenstates.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1.520 ± 0.005 OUR EVALUATION</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.518 ± 0.041 ± 0.027 1 AALTONEN 11AP CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

1.398 ± 0.044 $^{+0.028}_{-0.025}$ 2 ABAZOV 06V D0 $p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

1.42 $^{+0.14}_{-0.13}$ ± 0.03 3 ABREU 00Y DLPH $e^+e^-$ → Z

1.53 $^{+0.16}_{-0.15}$ ± 0.07 4 ABREU,P 00G DLPH $e^+e^-$ → Z

1.36 ± 0.09 $^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$ 5 ABE 99D CDF $p\bar{p}$ at 1.8 TeV

1.72 $^{+0.20}_{-0.19}$ $^{+0.18}_{-0.17}$ 6 ACKERSTAFF 98F OPAL $e^+e^-$ → Z

1.50 $^{+0.16}_{-0.15}$ ± 0.04 5 ACKERSTAFF 98G OPAL $e^+e^-$ → Z

1.47 ± 0.14 ± 0.08 4 BARATE 98C ALEC $e^+e^-$ → Z

1.51 ± 0.11 7 BARATE 98C ALEC $e^+e^-$ → Z

1.56 $^{+0.29}_{-0.26}$ $^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ 5 ABREU 96F DLPH Repl. by ABREU 00Y

1.65 $^{+0.34}_{-0.31}$ ± 0.12 4 ABREU 96F DLPH Repl. by ABREU 00Y

1.76 ± 0.20 $^{+0.15}_{-0.10}$ 8 ABREU 96F DLPH Repl. by ABREU 00Y

1.60 ± 0.26 $^{+0.13}_{-0.15}$ 9 ABREU 96F DLPH Repl. by ABREU,P 00G

1.67 ± 0.14 10 ABREU 96F DLPH $e^+e^-$ → Z

1.61 $^{+0.30}_{-0.29}$ $^{+0.18}_{-0.16}$ 90 4 BUSKULIC 96E ALEC Repl. by BARATE 98C

1.54 $^{+0.14}_{-0.13}$ ± 0.04 5 BUSKULIC 96M ALEC $e^+e^-$ → Z

1.42 $^{+0.27}_{-0.23}$ ± 0.11 76 5 ABE 95R CDF Repl. by ABE 99D

1.74 $^{+1.08}_{-0.69}$ ± 0.07 8 11 ABE 95R CDF Sup. by ABE 96N

1.54 $^{+0.25}_{-0.21}$ ± 0.06 79 5 AKERS 95G OPAL Repl. by ACKER-STAFF 98G

1.59 $^{+0.17}_{-0.15}$ ± 0.03 134 5 BUSKULIC 95O ALEC Sup. by BUSKULIC 96M

0.96 ± 0.37 41 12 ABREU 94E DLPH Sup. by ABREU 96F

1.92 $^{+0.45}_{-0.35}$ ± 0.04 31 5 BUSKULIC 94C ALEC Sup. by BUSKULIC 95O

1.13 $^{+0.35}_{-0.26}$ ± 0.09 22 5 ACTON 93H OPAL Sup. by AKERS 95G

1. AALTONEN 11AP combines the fully reconstructed $B_s^0 \to D_s^-\pi^+$ decays and partially reconstructed $B_s^0 \to D_sX$ decays.

2. Measured using $D_s\mu^+$ vertices.

3. Uses $D_s^-\ell^+$, and $\ell\phi^+$ vertices.

4. Measured using $D_s$ hadron vertices.

5. Measured using $D_s^-\ell^+$ vertices.

6. ACKERSTAFF 98F use fully reconstructed $D_s^- \to \phi\pi^-$ and $D_s^- \to K^{*0}K^-$ in the inclusive $B_s^0$ decay.

7. Combined results from $D_s^-\ell^+$ and $D_s$ hadron.

8. Measured using $\phi\ell$ vertices.

9. Measured using inclusive $D_s$ vertices.

10. Combined result for the four ABREU 96F methods.

11. Exclusive reconstruction of $B_s \to \psi\phi$.

12. ABREU 94E uses the flight-distance distribution of $D_s$ vertices, $\phi$-lepton vertices, and $D_s\mu$ vertices.

### $\Gamma_{B_s^0}$

"OUR EVALUATION" includes the measurements of $\Gamma_{B_s^0}$ and $\Delta\Gamma_{B_s^0}$ listed in this section, as well as constraints from effective lifetimes with pure CP modes and flavor-specific modes.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.6581 ± 0.0022 OUR EVALUATION</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.5. (Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>0.6611 ± 0.0028 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.0. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>0.6527 $^{+0.0013}_{-0.0015}$ ± 0.0022</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>24A LHCB pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.6687 ± 0.0015 ± 0.0022</td><td>2,3 AAD</td><td></td><td>21AE ATLS pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.608 ± 0.018 ± 0.012</td><td>4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21AN LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.6531 ± 0.0042 ± 0.0026</td><td>3,5 SIRUNYAN</td><td></td><td>21E CMS pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.650 ± 0.006 ± 0.004</td><td>6</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>17V LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.676 ± 0.004 ± 0.004</td><td>3,7 AAD</td><td></td><td>16AP ATLS pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.668 ± 0.011 ± 0.006</td><td>8</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>16AK LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.6704 ± 0.0043 ± 0.0055</td><td>3</td><td>KHACHATRY</td><td>16S CMS pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.6603 ± 0.0027 ± 0.0015</td><td>9</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>15I LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.677 ± 0.007 ± 0.004</td><td>3</td><td>AAD</td><td>14U ATLS pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.654 ± 0.008 ± 0.004</td><td>3</td><td>AALTONEN</td><td>12AJ CDF p<span style="text-decoration: overline">T</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.693 $^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$</td><td>3</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>12D D0 p<span style="text-decoration: overline">T</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.6531 ± 0.0042 ± 0.0026 3 SIRUNYAN 21E CMS pp at 13 TeV

0.6563 ± 0.0021 3 AAIJ 19Q LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 24A

0.661 ± 0.004 ± 0.006 10 AAIJ 13AR LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15I

0.677 ± 0.007 ± 0.004 3 AAD 12CV ATLS Repl. by AAD 14U

0.657 ± 0.009 ± 0.008 3 AAIJ 12D LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13AR

0.654 ± 0.011 ± 0.005 3,11 AALTONEN 12D CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 12AJ
# Meson Particle Listings

## $B_s^0$

<table><tr><td>0.672</td><td>±0.027</td><td>±0.013</td><td><sup>3</sup>ABAZOV</td><td>09E D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 08AM</td></tr><tr><td>0.658</td><td>±0.017</td><td>±0.009</td><td>3,12 AALTONEN</td><td>08J CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12D</td></tr><tr><td>0.658</td><td>±0.022</td><td>±0.004</td><td><sup>3</sup>ABAZOV</td><td>08AM D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 12D</td></tr><tr><td>0.658</td><td>±0.035</td><td>+0.0130<br/>-0.004</td><td>3,12 ABAZOV</td><td>07 D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 09E</td></tr><tr><td>0.714</td><td>+0.007<br/>-0.008</td><td>±0.010</td><td>3,12 ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 08J</td></tr></table>

1. Reports $\Gamma_s - \Gamma_d = -0.0056^{+0.0013}_{-0.0015}$ ± 0.0014 ps⁻¹ using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays and the current $B^0$ lifetime of 1.517 ± 0.004 ps⁻¹.

2. Reports a combination of .6703 ± 0.0014 ± 0.0018 ps⁻¹ with AAD 16AP.

3. Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

4. Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays with $J/\psi \to e^+ e^-$.

5. Reports a combination of 0.6590 ± 0.0032 ± 0.0023 ps⁻¹ with KHACHATRYAN 16s.

6. Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ in the region $m(KK) > 1.05$ GeV.

7. Reports a combination of 0.675 ± 0.003 ± 0.003 ps⁻¹ with AAD 14u.

8. Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi$ decays.

9. Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

10. Measured using a combined time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ and $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

11. Assuming CPV phase $\phi_S = -0.04$.

12. Assuming CPV phase $\phi_S = 0$.

### WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.6611±0.0028 (Error scaled by 2.0)

<figure><img src="image_636.png" /></figure>

### $\Delta\Gamma_{B_s^0}$

"OUR EVALUATION" includes the measurements of $\Gamma_{B_s^0}$ and $\Delta\Gamma_{B_s^0}$ listed in this section, as well as constraints from effective lifetimes with pure CP modes and flavor-specific modes.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>12</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.083</b> ±0.005</td><td><b>OUR EVALUATION</b></td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 1.8. (Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

0.079 ±0.005 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below.

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.0845 ± 0.0044 ± 0.0024</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>24A LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.0607 ± 0.0047 ± 0.0043</td><td>2,3 AAD</td><td>21AE ATLS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.115 ± 0.045 ± 0.011</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>21AN LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.114 ± 0.014 ± 0.007</td><td>2,5 SIRUNYAN</td><td>21E CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.066 ± 0.018 ± 0.010</td><td>6 AAIJ</td><td>17V LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.101 ± 0.013 ± 0.007</td><td>2,7 AAD</td><td>16AP ATLS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.066 ± 0.041<br/>-0.044</td><td>8 AAIJ</td><td>16AK LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.095 ± 0.013 ± 0.007</td><td>2 KHACHATRY...16S</td><td>CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.0805 ± 0.0091 ± 0.0032</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>15I LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.053 ± 0.021 ± 0.010</td><td>2 AAD</td><td>14U ATLS</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.068 ± 0.026 ± 0.009</td><td>2 AALTONEN</td><td>12AJ CDF</td><td>p\bar{p} at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.163 ± 0.065<br/>-0.064</td><td>2,9 ABAZOV</td><td>12D D0</td><td>p\bar{p} at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.077 ± 0.008 ± 0.003</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19Q LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 24A</td></tr><tr><td>0.106 ± 0.011 ± 0.007</td><td>10 AAIJ</td><td>13AR LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 15I</td></tr><tr><td>0.053 ± 0.021 ± 0.010</td><td>2 AAD</td><td>12CV ATLS</td><td>Repl. by AAD 14U</td></tr><tr><td>0.123 ± 0.029 ± 0.011</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>12D LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 13AR</td></tr><tr><td>0.075 ± 0.035 ± 0.006</td><td>11 AALTONEN</td><td>12D CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12AJ</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>0.085</td><td>+0.072<br/>-0.078</td><td>±0.001</td><td><sup>12</sup>ABAZOV</td><td>09E D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 08AM</td></tr><tr><td>0.076</td><td>+0.059<br/>-0.063</td><td>±0.006</td><td><sup>13</sup>AALTONEN</td><td>08J CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12D</td></tr><tr><td>0.19</td><td>±0.07</td><td>+0.02<br/>-0.01</td><td>2,14 ABAZOV</td><td>08AM D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 12D</td></tr><tr><td>0.12</td><td>+0.08<br/>-0.10</td><td>±0.02</td><td>13,15 ABAZOV</td><td>07 D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 07N</td></tr><tr><td>0.13</td><td>±0.09</td><td></td><td>16 ABAZOV</td><td>07N D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 09E</td></tr><tr><td>0.47</td><td>+0.19<br/>-0.24</td><td>±0.01</td><td><sup>13</sup>ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 08J</td></tr></tbody></table>

1. Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

2. Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

3. Reports a combination of 0.0657 ± 0.0043 ± 0.0037 ps⁻¹ with AAD 16AP.

4. Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays with $J/\psi \to e^+ e^-$.

5. Reports a combination of 0.1032 ± 0.0095 ± 0.0048 ps⁻¹ with KHACHATRYAN 16s.

6. Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ in the region $m(KK) > 1.05$ GeV.

7. Reports a combination of $0.066^{+0.041}_{-0.044}$ ± 0.007 ps⁻¹ with AAD 14u.

8. Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to \psi(2S)\phi$ decays.

9. The error includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

10. AAIJ 13AR result comes from a combined fit to $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ and $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ data sets. Also reports $\Delta\Gamma_s = 0.100 \pm 0.016 \pm 0.003$ ps⁻¹ from a fit to $B_s^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

11. Uses the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays and assuming CP-violating angle $\beta_S(B^0 \to J/\psi\phi) = 0.02$.

12. Measured the angular and lifetime parameters for the time-dependent angular untagged decays $B_d^0 \to J/\psi K^+ d$ and $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$.

13. Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays and assuming CP-violating phase $\phi_S = 0$.

14. Obtained 90% CL interval $-0.06 < \Delta\Gamma_s < 0.30$.

15. ABAZOV 07 reports $0.17 \pm 0.09 \pm 0.02$ with CP-violating phase $\phi_S$ as a free parameter.

16. Combines $D^0$ measurements of time-dependent angular distributions in $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ and charge asymmetry in semileptonic decays. There is a 4-fold ambiguity in the solution.

### WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.079±0.005 (Error scaled by 1.6)

<figure><img src="image_637.png" /></figure>

### $\Delta\Gamma_{B_s^0}/\Gamma_{B_s^0}$

$\Gamma_{B_s^0}$ and $\Delta\Gamma_{B_s^0}$ are the decay rate average and difference between two $B_s^0$ CP eigenstates (light – heavy). "OUR EVALUATION" is derived from the averages of $\Gamma_{B_s^0}$ and $\Delta\Gamma_{B_s^0}$ (and their correlation).

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><b>0.127</b> ±0.007</td><td><b>OUR EVALUATION</b></td><td></td><td></td><td>(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr><tr><td>0.090 ±0.009 ±0.023</td><td></td><td>1 ESEN</td><td>13 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>12D LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>3 AALTONEN</td><td>12D CDF</td><td>p\bar{p} at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>4 ABAZOV</td><td>12D D0</td><td>p\bar{p} at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.147 ±0.036 ±0.042<br/>-0.030 -0.041</td><td></td><td>1 ESEN</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr><tr><td>0.072 ±0.021 ±0.022</td><td></td><td>5 ABAZOV</td><td>09I D0</td><td>p\bar{p} at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>>0.012</td><td>95</td><td>5 AALTONEN</td><td>08F CDF</td><td>p\bar{p} at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>0.116 ±0.09<br/>-0.10</td><td>±0.010</td><td>6 AALTONEN</td><td>08J CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12D</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><tbody><tr><td>0.079<sup>+0.038</sup><sub>-0.035</sub> +0.031</td><td>5 ABAZOV</td><td>07Y D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 09I</td></tr><tr><td>0.24<sup>+0.28</sup><sub>-0.38</sub> +0.03</td><td>6,7 ABAZOV</td><td>05W D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 08AM</td></tr><tr><td>0.65<sup>+0.25</sup><sub>-0.33</sub> +0.01</td><td>6 ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 08J</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.46</td><td>95</td><td>8 ABREU</td><td>00Y DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.69</td><td>95</td><td>9 ABREU,P</td><td>00G DLPH e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>0.25<sup>+0.21</sup><sub>-0.14</sub></td><td>10 BARATE</td><td>00k ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.83</td><td>95</td><td>11 ABE</td><td>99D CDF p̄p̄ at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;0.67</td><td>95</td><td>12 ACCIARRI</td><td>98S L3 e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Assumes CP violation is negligible.

²Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

³Uses the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays and assuming CP-violating angle $\beta_S(B^0 \to J/\psi\phi) = 0.02$.

⁴Measured using fully reconstructed $B_s \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

⁵Assumes 2 $B(B_s^0 \to D_s^+D_s^+) \sim \Delta\Gamma_{sCP^+}/\Gamma_s$.

⁶Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

⁷Uses $|A_0|^2 - |A_{ij}|^2 = 0.355 \pm 0.066$ from ACOSTA 05.

⁸Uses $D_s^-\ell^+$, and $\phi\ell^+$ vertices.

⁹Measured using $D_s$ hadron vertices.

¹⁰Uses $\phi\phi$ correlations from $B_s^0 \to D_s^+D_s^-$.

¹¹ABE 99d assumes $\tau_{B^0} = 1.55 \pm 0.05$ ps.

¹²ACCIARRI 98s assumes $\tau_{B^0} = 1.49 \pm 0.06$ ps and PDG 98 values of b production fraction.

B⁰ₕH MEAN LIFE

$B_s^0$ is the heavy mass state of two $B_s^0$ CP eigenstates.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>1.622&plusmn;0.008 OUR EVALUATION</strong> (Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr><tr><td>0.99<sup>+0.42</sup><sub>-0.00</sub> &plusmn; 0.17</td><td>1 AAD</td><td>23BY ATLS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.83<sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.20</sub> &plusmn; 0.04</td><td>1 TUMASYAN</td><td>23A CMS</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.07 &plusmn; 0.29 &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>22 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.70<sup>+0.60</sup><sub>-0.43</sub> &plusmn; 0.09</td><td>1 SIRUNYAN</td><td>20AG CMS</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.677 &plusmn; 0.034 &plusmn; 0.011</td><td>2 SIRUNYAN</td><td>18BY CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.04 &plusmn; 0.44 &plusmn; 0.05</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17AI LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.70 &plusmn; 0.14 &plusmn; 0.05</td><td>3 ABAZOV</td><td>16C D0</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.75 &plusmn; 0.12 &plusmn; 0.07</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>13AB LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.652 &plusmn; 0.024 &plusmn; 0.024</td><td>5 AAIJ</td><td>13AR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.700 &plusmn; 0.040 &plusmn; 0.026</td><td>6 AAIJ</td><td>12AN LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.70<sup>+0.12</sup><sub>-0.11</sub> &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>7 AALTONEN</td><td>12D CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.613<sup>+0.123</sup><sub>-0.113</sub></td><td>8,9 AALTONEN</td><td>08J CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12D</td></tr><tr><td>1.58<sup>+0.39</sup><sub>-0.42</sub> &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>9 ABAZOV</td><td>05W D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 08AM</td></tr><tr><td>2.07<sup>+0.58</sup><sub>-0.46</sub> &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>9 ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 08J</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Measured using $B_S \to \mu^+\mu^-$ decays which, in the Standard Model, correspond to $B_{sH}^0$ decays. Assumes $-2 \text{Re}(\lambda)/(1 + |\lambda|^2) = 1$.

²Measured using $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays with $0.9240 < m(\pi\pi) < 1.0204$ GeV, which is dominated by the $f_0(980)$ resonance, making it a CP-odd state.

³Measured using $J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ mode with $0.880 < m(\pi\pi) < 1.080$ GeV/c², which is mostly $J/\psi f(0)(980)$ mode, a pure CP-odd final state.

⁴Measured using a pure CP-odd final state $J/\psi K_S^0$ with the assumption that contributions from penguin diagrams are small.

⁵Measured using $B_S \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays which, in the limit of $\phi_S = 0$ and $|\lambda| = 1$, correspond to $B_S^0$ decays.

⁶Measured using a pure CP-odd final state $J/\psi f_0(980)$.

⁷Uses the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays assuming CP-violating angle $\beta_S(B^0 \to J/\psi\phi) = 0.02$.

⁸Obtained from $\Delta\Gamma_s$ and $\Gamma_s$ fit with a correlation of 0.6.

⁹Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

B⁰ₕL MEAN LIFE

$B_s^0$ is the light mass state of two $B_s^0$ CP eigenstates.

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>1.429&plusmn;0.006 OUR EVALUATION</strong> (Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>1.452&plusmn;0.016 OUR AVERAGE</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1.445&plusmn;0.016 &plusmn; 0.008</td><td>1,2 AAIJ</td><td>23P LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.479&plusmn;0.034 &plusmn; 0.011</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16AL LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>1.40 &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>3 SIRUNYAN</td><td>18BY CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.379 &plusmn; 0.026 &plusmn; 0.017</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>14F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.407 &plusmn; 0.016 &plusmn; 0.007</td><td>5 AAIJ</td><td>14R LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.440 &plusmn; 0.096 &plusmn; 0.009</td><td>5 AAIJ</td><td>12 LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.455 &plusmn; 0.046 &plusmn; 0.006</td><td>5 AAIJ</td><td>12R LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14R</td></tr><tr><td>1.437<sup>+0.054</sup><sub>-0.047</sub></td><td>6 AALTONEN</td><td>12D CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.24<sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.11</sub> &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>7,8 AALTONEN</td><td>08J CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 12D</td></tr><tr><td>1.05<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.13</sub> &plusmn; 0.02</td><td>8 ABAZOV</td><td>05W D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 08AM</td></tr><tr><td>1.27 &plusmn; 0.33 &plusmn; 0.08</td><td>8 ACOSTA</td><td>05 CDF</td><td>Repl. by AALTONEN 08J</td></tr><tr><td>1 Uses $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\eta$ decays.</td><td>9 BARATE</td><td>00K ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

²AAIJ 23P reports a $\tau_L$ value combined with AAIJ 16AL result as $\tau_L = 1.452 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.007$ ps.

³Measured using results in SIRUNYAN 18BY for the heavy $B_s^0$ lifetime obtained from $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays and the average effective $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ lifetime, and magnitude squared of the CP-odd amplitude $|A_\perp|^2 = 0.250 \pm 0.006$. The uncertainty includes all statistical and systematic contributions.

⁴Measured using $B_s^0 \to D_s^-D_s^-$: The effective lifetime is translated into a decay width of $\Gamma_L = 0.725 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.009$ ps⁻¹.

⁵Measured using $B_s^0 \to K^+K^-$ decays. There may still be CPV in the decay.

⁶Uses the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays and assuming CP-violating angle $\beta_S(B^0 \to J/\psi\phi) = 0.02$.

⁷Obtained from $\Delta\Gamma_s$ and $\Gamma_s$ fit with a correlation of 0.6.

⁸Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_s^0 \to J/\psi\phi$ decays.

⁹Uses $\phi\phi$ correlations from $B_s^0 \to D_s^{(*)+}D_s^{(*)-}$.

B⁰ₕ MEAN LIFE (Flavor specific)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (10<sup>-12</sup> s)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>1.527&plusmn;0.011 OUR EVALUATION</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><strong>1.526&plusmn;0.015 OUR AVERAGE</strong> Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below.</td></tr><tr><td>1.547&plusmn;0.013 &plusmn; 0.011</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>17AN LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.479&plusmn;0.010 &plusmn; 0.021</td><td>2 ABAZOV</td><td>15A D0</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.535&plusmn;0.015 &plusmn; 0.014</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>14AX LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.52 &plusmn; 0.15 &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>4 AAIJ</td><td>14F LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.60 &plusmn; 0.06 &plusmn; 0.01</td><td>5 AAIJ</td><td>14R LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.518&plusmn;0.041 &plusmn; 0.027</td><td>6 AALTONEN</td><td>11AP CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.42<sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.13</sub> &plusmn; 0.03</td><td>7 ABREU</td><td>00Y DLPH</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.36 &plusmn; 0.09 &plusmn; 0.06</td><td>8 ABE</td><td>99D CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1.50<sup>+0.16</sup><sub>-0.15</sub> &plusmn; 0.04</td><td>8 ACKERSTAFF</td><td>98G OPAL</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.54<sup>+0.14</sup><sub>-0.13</sub> &plusmn; 0.04</td><td>8 BUSKULIC</td><td>96M ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>1.398 &plusmn; 0.044<sup>+0.028</sup><sub>-0.025</sub></td><td>9 ABAZOV</td><td>06V D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 15A</td></tr></table>

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.526&plusmn;0.015 (Error scaled by 1.3)

<figure><img src="image_638.png" /></figure>

$B_s^0$ MEAN LIFE (Flavor specific) (10⁻¹² s)

¹AAIJ 17AN value was measured using $B_s^0 \to D_s^{(*)+}\mu^+\nu_\mu$ decays relative to $B^0 \to D_s^{(*)-}\mu^+\nu_\mu$ decays.

²Measured using $B_s^0 \to D_s^+\mu^+\nu_\mu$ decays.

³Measured using the $B_s^0 \to D_s^+\pi^+$ decays.

⁴Measured using $B_s^0 \to D^+D_s^-$.

⁵Measured using $B_s^0 \to \pi^+K^-$ decays.
# Meson Particle Listings

## $B_S^0$

6 AALTONEN 11AP combines the fully reconstructed $B_S^0 \to D_S^- \pi^+$ decays and partially reconstructed $B_S^0 \to D_S^- X$ decays.

7 Uses $D_S^- \ell^+$, and $\phi \ell^+$ vertices.

8 Measured using $D_S^- \ell^+$ vertices.

9 Measured using $D_S^- \mu^+$ vertices.

## $B_S^0$ MEAN LIFE (partial)

### $B_S^0$ mean life ($B_S \to D_S^+ D_S^-$)

VALUE (10⁻¹² s)

**1.379±0.031 OUR EVALUATION**

**1.379±0.026±0.017**

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3">(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 14F LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1 Measured using $B_S^0 \to D_S^- D_S^+$. The effective lifetime is translated into a decay width of $\tau_L = 0.725 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.009 \text{ ps}^{-1}$.

### $B_S^0$ mean life ($B_S \to J/\psi \phi$)

VALUE (10⁻¹² s)

**1.480±0.007 OUR EVALUATION**

**1.480±0.007 OUR AVERAGE**

1.481±0.007±0.005

1.480±0.011±0.005

1.444 ±0.098 ±0.020

1.34 +0.23 -0.19 ±0.05

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 SIRUNYAN</td><td>18BY CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>1 ABAZOV</td><td>05B D0</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">P</span> at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2 ABE</td><td>98B CDF</td><td>p<span style="text-decoration: overline">P</span> at 1.8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.39 +0.13 -0.16 ±0.02

1.34 +0.23 -0.19 ±0.05

2 ABAZOV 05W D0 p<span style="text-decoration: overline">P</span> at 1.96 TeV

3 ABE 96N CDF Repl. by ABE 98B

1 Measured using fully reconstructed $B_S \to J/\psi \phi$ decays.

2 Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi \phi$ decays.

3 ABE 96N uses 58 ± 12 exclusive $B_S \to J/\psi \phi$ events.

### $B_S^0$ mean life ($B_S \to J/\psi \eta$)

VALUE (10⁻¹² s)

**1.452±0.016 OUR EVALUATION**

**1.452±0.016 OUR AVERAGE**

1.445±0.016±0.008

1.479±0.034±0.011

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3">(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1,2 AAIJ 23P LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

1 AAIJ 16L LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

1 Uses $B_S^0 \to J/\psi \eta$ decays.

2 AAIJ 23P reports a $\tau_L$ value combined with AAIJ 16AL result as $\tau_L = 1.452 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.007$ ps.

### $B_S^0$ mean life ($B_S \to J/\psi K_S^0$)

VALUE (10⁻¹² s)

**1.75±0.14 OUR EVALUATION**

**1.75±0.12±0.07**

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3">(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 13AB LHCB pp at 7 TeV

1 Measured using a pure CP-odd final state $J/\psi K_S^0$ with the assumption that contributions from penguin diagrams are small.

### $B_S^0$ mean life ($B_S \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^-$)

VALUE (10⁻¹² s)

**1.646±0.013 OUR EVALUATION**

**1.660±0.022 OUR AVERAGE**

1.632±0.013±0.05

1.677±0.034±0.011

1.70 ±0.14 ±0.05

1.652±0.024±0.024

1.70 +0.12 -0.11 ±0.03

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3">(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.700±0.040±0.026

5 AAIJ 12AN LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 13AR

1 Based on $\Delta\Gamma = \Gamma_H - \Gamma_{B^0} = -0.05 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.004 \text{ ps}^{-1}$ and $\tau_{B^0} = 1.517 \pm 0.004$ ps. The first error is due to the combined $\Delta\Gamma$ uncertainty and the second is from $\tau_{B^0}$ uncertainty.

2 Measured using $B_S^0 \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays with 0.9240 < m(ππ) < 1.0204 GeV, which is dominated by the $f_0(980)$ resonance, making it a CP-odd state.

3 Measured using $J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^-$ mode with 0.880 < m(ππ) < 1.080 GeV/c², which is mostly $J/\psi f(0)(980)$ mode, a pure CP-odd final state.

4 Measured using $B_S \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays which, in the limit of $\phi_S = 0$ and $|\lambda| = 1$, corresponds to $B_{S,H}^0$ decays.

5 Measured using a pure CP-odd final state $J/\psi f_0(980)$.

### $B_S^0$ mean life ($B_S \to K^+ K^-$)

VALUE (10⁻¹² s)

**1.408±0.017 OUR EVALUATION**

**1.408±0.017 OUR AVERAGE**

1.407±0.016±0.007

1.440±0.096±0.009

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3">(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 AAIJ 14R LHCB pp at 7 TeV

1 AAIJ 12 LHCB pp at 7 TeV

1 Measured using $B_S^0 \to K^+ K^-$ decays. There may still be CPV in the decay.

## $B_S^0$ mean life ($B_S \to \mu\mu$)

VALUE (10⁻¹² s)

**1.79±0.17 OUR EVALUATION**

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3">(Produced by HFLAV)</td></tr></tbody></table>

**1.80+0.24-0.18 OUR AVERAGE**

Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below.

0.99 +0.42 -0.07 ±0.17

1 AAD 23BY ATLS pp at 13 TeV

1.83 +0.23 -0.20 ±0.04

1 TUMASYAN 23A CMS pp at 13 TeV

2.07±0.29±0.03

1 AAIJ 22 LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.70 +0.60 -0.43 ±0.09

1 SIRUNYAN 20AG CMS Repl. by TUMASYAN 23A

2.04±0.44±0.05

1 AAIJ 17AI LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 22

1 Measured using $B_S \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ decays which, in the Standard Model, correspond to $B_{S,H}^0$ decays. Assumes $-2 \text{ Re}(\lambda)/(1 + |\lambda|^2) = 1$.

## WEIGHTED AVERAGE
1.80+0.24-0.18 (Error scaled by 1.4)

<figure><img src="image_639.png" /><figcaption>$B_S^0$ mean life ($B_S \to \mu\mu$) (10⁻¹² s)</figcaption></figure>

## $\tau_{B_S^0}/\tau_{B^0}$ mean life ratio

$\tau_{B_S^0}/\tau_{B^0}$ (direct measurements)

VALUE
0.980±0.006±0.003

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 SIRUNYAN</td><td>18BY CMS</td><td>pp at 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using $B_S^0 \to J/\psi \phi(1020)$ and $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^*(892)^0$ decays.

## $\tau_{B_S^0} - \tau_{B^0}$

VALUE (10¹² s⁻¹)

-0.0041±0.0024±0.0015

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19Q LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of $B_S^0 \to J/\psi K^+ K^-$ decays.

## $\tau_{B_S^0} - \tau_{B^0}$

VALUE (10¹² s⁻¹)

-0.05±0.004±0.004

<table><thead><tr><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>19AF LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Measured in $B_S^0 \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays.

## $B_S^0$ DECAY MODES

These branching fractions all scale with $B(\bar{D} \to B_S^0)$.

The branching fraction $B(B_S^0 \to D_S^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)$ anything) is not a pure measurement since the measured product branching fraction $B(\bar{D} \to B_S^0) \times B(B_S^0 \to D_S^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell)$ anything) was used to determine $B(\bar{D} \to B_S^0)$, as described in the note on "$B_0-\bar{B}_0$ Mixing".

For inclusive branching fractions, e.g., $B \to D^+ anything$, the values usually are multiplicities, not branching fractions. They can be greater than one.

<table><thead><tr><th>Mode</th><th>Fraction (Γ<sub>f</sub>/Γ)</th><th>Scale factor/ Confidence level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>1</sub> D<sup>-</sup><sub>S</sub> anything</td><td>(62 ± 6) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>2</sub> D<sup>±</sup><sub>S</sub> anything</td><td>(92 ± 11) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>3</sub> D<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>/D<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub> anything</td><td>(38 ± 10) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>4</sub> ℓν<sub>ℓ</sub>X</td><td>(9.6 ± 0.8) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>5</sub> e<sup>+</sup>νX<sup>-</sup></td><td>(9.1 ± 0.8) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>6</sub> μ<sup>+</sup>νX<sup>-</sup></td><td>(10.2 ± 1.0) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>7</sub> D<sup>-</sup><sub>S</sub> ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>[a] (8.1 ± 1.3) %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>8</sub> D<sup>-</sup><sub>S</sub> ℓ<sup>+</sup>ν<sub>ℓ</sub> anything</td><td>(5.4 ± 1.1) %</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
See key on page 1171

Meson Particle Listings

B⁰₅

<table>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ9</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>-</sup> μ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>μ</sub></td>
      <td>( 2.31 ± 0.21 ) %</td>
      <td>Γ70</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S)ρ, ρ → π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 3.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ10</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>-</sup> μ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>μ</sub></td>
      <td>( 5.2 ± 0.5 ) %</td>
      <td>Γ71</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 1.24 ± 0.15 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>S=2.1</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ11</td>
      <td>D<sub>S1</sub>(2536)<sup>-</sup> μ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>μ</sub>, D<sub>S1</sub><sup>-</sup> → D<sup>-</sup>* K<sub>S</sub><sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.7 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ72</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>2</sub>(1270), f<sub>2</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 1.0 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ12</td>
      <td>D<sub>S1</sub>(2536)<sup>-</sup> X μ<sup>+</sup> ν, D<sub>S1</sub><sup>-</sup> →</td>
      <td>( 4.4 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ73</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>2</sub>(1270)<sub>0</sub>, f<sub>2</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 7.3 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ13</td>
      <td>D<sub>S2</sub>(2573)<sup>-</sup> X μ<sup>+</sup> ν, D<sub>S2</sub><sup>-</sup> →</td>
      <td>( 2.7 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ74</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>2</sub>(1270) ||, f<sub>2</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 1.05 ± 0.33 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ14</td>
      <td>K<sup>-</sup> μ<sup>+</sup> ν<sub>μ</sub></td>
      <td>( 1.06 ± 0.09 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ75</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>2</sub>(1270) <sub>⊥</sub>, f<sub>2</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 1.3 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ15</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.98 ± 0.14 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ76</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>0</sub>(1370), f<sub>0</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 4.4 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ16</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>-</sup> ρ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 6.8 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ77</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>0</sub>(1500), f<sub>0</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 2.04 ± 0.24 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ17</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 6.1 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ78</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f'<sub>2</sub>(1525)<sub>0</sub>, f'<sub>2</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 1.03 ± 0.22 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ18</td>
      <td>D<sub>S1</sub>(2536)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sub>S1</sub><sup>-</sup> → D<sub>S</sub><sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.4 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ79</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f'<sub>2</sub>(1525) ||, f'<sub>2</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 1.2 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ19</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>‡</sup> K<sup>±</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.25 ± 0.12 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ80</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f'<sub>2</sub>(1525) <sub>⊥</sub>, f'<sub>2</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 5 ± 4 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ20</td>
      <td>D<sub>S1</sub>(2536)<sup>+</sup> K<sup>±</sup>, D<sub>S1</sub><sup>-</sup> → D<sup>-</sup>* (2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.48 ± 0.28 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ81</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>0</sub>(1790), f<sub>0</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 4.9 ± 10.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ21</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>-</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.2 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ82</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> (nonresonant)</td>
      <td>( 1.74 ± 0.10 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ22</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>+</sup> D<sub>S</sub><sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.4 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ83</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) K<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 4.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ23</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>-</sup> D<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.8 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ84</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.9 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ24</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>+</sup> D<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.2 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ85</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>( 9.5 ± 1.3 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ25</td>
      <td>D<sup>*+</sup> D<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td></td>
      <td>Γ86</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ26</td>
      <td>D<sup>*-</sup> D<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td></td>
      <td>Γ87</td>
      <td>J/ψ K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.10 ± 0.09 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ27</td>
      <td>D<sup>*+</sup> D<sup>*-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.14 ± 0.32 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ88</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f'<sub>2</sub>(1525)</td>
      <td>( 2.6 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ28</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.9 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ89</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) ρ p̄</td>
      <td>( 3.6 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ29</td>
      <td>D<sup>*-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.9 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ90</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) γ</td>
      <td>&lt; 7.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ30</td>
      <td>D<sup>*‡</sup> K<sup>±</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.32 ± 0.40 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ91</td>
      <td>J/ψ μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup>, J/ψ → μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 2.6 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td>
      <td>CL=95%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ31</td>
      <td>D<sup>*-</sup> ρ<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 9.5 ± 2.0 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ92</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.5 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ32</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>+</sup> D<sub>S</sub><sup>-</sup> + D<sub>S</sub><sup>*-</sup> D<sub>S</sub><sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.39 ± 0.17 ) %</td>
      <td>Γ93</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>1</sub>(1285)</td>
      <td>( 7.2 ± 1.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ33</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>+</sup> D<sub>S</sub><sup>*-</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.44 ± 0.21 ) %</td>
      <td>Γ94</td>
      <td>ψ(2S) η</td>
      <td>( 3.3 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ34</td>
      <td>D<sub>S</sub><sup>*</sup> + D<sub>S</sub><sup>*</sup> - D<sub>S</sub><sup>*</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.5 ± 1.4 ) %</td>
      <td>Γ95</td>
      <td>ψ(2S) η'</td>
      <td>( 1.29 ± 0.35 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ35</td>
      <td>D<sup>*-</sup> D<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.9 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ96</td>
      <td>ψ(2S) π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 6.9 ± 1.2 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ36</td>
      <td>D<sup>*0</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.8 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ97</td>
      <td>ψ(2S) φ</td>
      <td>( 5.3 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ37</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.3 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ98</td>
      <td>ψ(2S) K<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.9 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ38</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.04 ± 0.13 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ99</td>
      <td>ψ(2S) K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.1 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ39</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup>(2007)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.3 ± 2.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ100</td>
      <td>ψ(2S) K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.3 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ40</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.4 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ101</td>
      <td>χ<sub>C1</sub> φ</td>
      <td>( 1.97 ± 0.25 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ41</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(1410)</td>
      <td>( 3.9 ± 3.5 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ102</td>
      <td>χ<sub>C1</sub> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ42</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(1430)</td>
      <td>( 3.0 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ103</td>
      <td>χ<sub>C2</sub> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ43</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(1430)</td>
      <td>( 1.1 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ104</td>
      <td>χ<sub>C1</sub>(3872) φ</td>
      <td>( 1.22 ± 0.35 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ44</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(1680)</td>
      <td>&lt; 7.8 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ105</td>
      <td>χ<sub>C1</sub>(3872) (K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup>) non-φ</td>
      <td>( 9.4 ± 3.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ45</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(1950)</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.1 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ106</td>
      <td>χ<sub>C1</sub>(3872) π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.6 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ46</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(1780)</td>
      <td>&lt; 2.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ107</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 7.2 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ47</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(2045)</td>
      <td>&lt; 3.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ108</td>
      <td>π<sup>0</sup> π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 7.7 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ48</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup> (non-resonant)</td>
      <td>( 2.1 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ109</td>
      <td>η π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ49</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup><sub>S2</sub>(2573)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sup>*</sup><sub>S2</sub> → D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.6 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ110</td>
      <td>η η</td>
      <td>&lt; 1.43 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ50</td>
      <td>D<sub>S1</sub>(2700)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sup>*</sup><sub>S1</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 1.6 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ111</td>
      <td>ρ<sup>0</sup> ρ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 3.20 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ51</td>
      <td>D<sup>*</sup><sub>S1</sub>(2860)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sup>*</sup><sub>S1</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 5 ± 4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ112</td>
      <td>η' K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub></td>
      <td>&lt; 8.16 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ52</td>
      <td>D<sub>S3</sub>(2860)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup>, D<sup>*</sup><sub>S3</sub> →</td>
      <td>( 2.2 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ113</td>
      <td>η' η</td>
      <td>&lt; 6.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ53</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.6 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ114</td>
      <td>η' η'</td>
      <td>( 3.3 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ54</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> D<sup>0</sup> f<sub>0</sub>(980)</td>
      <td>&lt; 3.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>Γ115</td>
      <td>η' φ</td>
      <td>&lt; 8.2 × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
      <td>CL=90%</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ55</td>
      <td>D<sup>0</sup> φ</td>
      <td>( 2.30 ± 0.25 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ116</td>
      <td>φ f<sub>0</sub>(980), f<sub>0</sub>(980) → π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.12 ± 0.21 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ56</td>
      <td>D<sup>*0</sup> φ</td>
      <td>( 3.2 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ117</td>
      <td>φ f<sub>2</sub>(1270), f<sub>2</sub>(1270) →</td>
      <td>( 6.1 ± 1.8 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ57</td>
      <td>D<sup>*+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 6.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>Γ118</td>
      <td>φ ρ<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.7 ± 0.8 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ58</td>
      <td>η<sub>C</sub> φ</td>
      <td>( 5.0 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ119</td>
      <td>φ π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.5 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ59</td>
      <td>η' X<sub>S3</sub></td>
      <td></td>
      <td>Γ120</td>
      <td>φ φ</td>
      <td>( 1.85 ± 0.14 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ60</td>
      <td>η<sub>C</sub> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.8 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ121</td>
      <td>φ φ φ</td>
      <td>( 2.2 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ61</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) φ</td>
      <td>( 1.04 ± 0.04 ) × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ122</td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 5.9 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ62</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) φ φ</td>
      <td>( 1.20<sup>+</sup> 0.14<sup>-</sup> 0.16<sup>+</sup>) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ123</td>
      <td>K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.72 ± 0.23 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ63</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) π<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>&lt; 1.2 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td>
      <td>Γ124</td>
      <td>K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.76 ± 0.31 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ64</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) η</td>
      <td>( 4.0 ± 0.7 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ125</td>
      <td>K<sup>0</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 9.5 ± 2.1 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ65</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub></td>
      <td>( 1.92 ± 0.14 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ126</td>
      <td>K<sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 8.4 ± 0.9 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ66</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td>
      <td>( 4.1 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td>Γ127</td>
      <td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>-</sup> π<sup>+</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.9 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ67</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) η'</td>
      <td>( 3.3 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ128</td>
      <td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>±</sup> K<sup>‡</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.9 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ68</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td>( 2.02 ± 0.17 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td>
      <td>Γ129</td>
      <td>K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>(1430)<sup>±</sup> K<sup>‡</sup></td>
      <td>( 3.1 ± 2.5 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Γ69</td>
      <td>J/ψ(1S) f<sub>0</sub>(500), f<sub>0</sub> →</td>
      <td>&lt; 4 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td>
      <td>Γ130</td>
      <td>K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>(1430)<sup>±</sup> K<sup>‡</sup></td>
      <td>( 1.0 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td></td>
      <td>π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td>
      <td></td>
      <td>Γ131</td>
      <td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>0</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>( 2.0 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
      <td>Γ132</td>
      <td>K<sup>0</sup><sub>S</sub>(1430) K<sup>0</sup> + c.c.</td>
      <td>( 3.3 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
# Meson Particle Listings

## $B_S^0$

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>133</sub></td><td>K<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> K̄<sup>0</sup> + c.c.</td><td>( 1.7 ± 2.2 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>134</sub></td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> K̄<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> + c.c.</td><td>( 1.6 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>135</sub></td><td>K<sub>0</sub><sup>0</sup> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.3 ± 0.6 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>136</sub></td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> ρ<sup>0</sup></td><td>&lt; 7.67 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>137</sub></td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.11 ± 0.27 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>138</sub></td><td>K<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>139</sub></td><td>K<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>140</sub></td><td>K<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup> K̄<sub>2</sub><sup>0</sup>(1430)<sup>0</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>141</sub></td><td>φK<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup></td><td>( 1.14 ± 0.30 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>142</sub></td><td>ρp̄</td><td>&lt; 4.4 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>143</sub></td><td>ρp̄ K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 4.5 ± 0.5 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>144</sub></td><td>ρp̄ K<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 1.39 ± 0.26 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>145</sub></td><td>ρp̄ π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup></td><td>( 4.3 ± 2.0 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>146</sub></td><td>ρp̄ p̄</td><td>( 2.3 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-8</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>147</sub></td><td>ρp̄ λK<sup>+</sup> + c.c.</td><td>( 5.5 ± 1.0 ) × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>148</sub></td><td>Λ<sub>c</sub> Λπ<sup>+</sup></td><td>( 3.6 ± 1.6 ) × 10<sup>-4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>149</sub></td><td>Λ<sub>c</sub> Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>+</sup></td><td>&lt; 8.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

### Lepton Family number (LF) violating modes or $\Delta B = 1$ weak neutral current (B1) modes

<table><tbody><tr><td>Γ<sub>150</sub></td><td>γγ</td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 3.1 × 10<sup>-6</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>151</sub></td><td>φγ</td><td>B1</td><td>( 3.4 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>152</sub></td><td>μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>( 3.34 ± 0.27 ) × 10<sup>-9</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>153</sub></td><td>e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 9.4 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>154</sub></td><td>τ<sup>+</sup> τ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 6.8 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>155</sub></td><td>μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup> γ</td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 2.0 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>156</sub></td><td>μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup> μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 8.6 × 10<sup>-10</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>157</sub></td><td>S P, S → μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup>,<br>P → μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>[b] &lt; 2.2 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>158</sub></td><td>aa, a → μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 5.8 × 10<sup>-10</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>159</sub></td><td>φ(1020) μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>( 8.4 ± 0.4 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>160</sub></td><td>f<sub>2</sub><sup>'</sup>(1525) μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>( 1.62 ± 0.22 ) × 10<sup>-7</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>161</sub></td><td>K<sup>*</sup>(892)<sup>0</sup> μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>( 2.9 ± 1.1 ) × 10<sup>-8</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>162</sub></td><td>π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup></td><td>B1</td><td>( 8.4 ± 1.7 ) × 10<sup>-8</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>163</sub></td><td>φνν̄</td><td>B1</td><td>&lt; 5.4 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>164</sub></td><td>e<sup>±</sup> μ<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>[c] &lt; 5.4 × 10<sup>-9</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>165</sub></td><td>e<sup>±</sup> τ<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 1.4 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>166</sub></td><td>μ<sup>±</sup> τ<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 4.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>167</sub></td><td>φμ<sup>±</sup> e<sup>∓</sup></td><td>LF</td><td>&lt; 1.6 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Γ<sub>168</sub></td><td>ρμ<sup>-</sup></td><td>L,B</td><td>&lt; 1.21 × 10<sup>-8</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

[a] Not a pure measurement. See note at head of $B_S^0$ Decay Modes.

[b] Here S and P are the hypothetical scalar and pseudoscalar particles with masses of 2.5 GeV/c<fnref n="2" /> and 214.3 MeV/c<fnref n="2" />, respectively.

[c] The value is for the sum of the charge states or particle/antiparticle states indicated.

### FIT INFORMATION

An overall fit to 12 branching ratios uses 20 measurements to determine 7 parameters. The overall fit has a $\chi^2 = 27.0$ for 13 degrees of freedom.

The following off-diagonal array elements are the correlation coefficients $\langle \delta x_i \delta x_j \rangle / (\delta x_i \delta x_j)$, in percent, from the fit to the branching fractions, $x_i \equiv \Gamma_i / \Gamma_{\text{total}}$.

<table><tbody><tr><td>x<sub>17</sub></td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>19</sub></td><td>82</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>61</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>68</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>43</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>71</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>31</td><td>52</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>120</sub></td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>15</td><td>6</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>x<sub>15</sub></td><td>x<sub>17</sub></td><td>x<sub>19</sub></td><td>x<sub>61</sub></td><td>x<sub>68</sub></td><td>x<sub>71</sub></td></tr></tbody></table>

### $B_S^0$ BRANCHING RATIOS

#### $\Gamma(D_S^- anything)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0.62 ± 0.06</strong></td><td><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.602 ± 0.058 ± 0.023</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>WANG</td><td>22 BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(55)</td></tr><tr><td>0.91 ± 0.18 ± 0.41</td><td></td><td>2</td><td>DRUTSKOY</td><td>07 BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(45)</td></tr><tr><td>0.81 ± 0.24 ± 0.22</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>96E ALEP e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>1.56 ± 0.58 ± 0.44</td><td>147</td><td>4</td><td>ACTON</td><td>92N OPAL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(D_s^+ anything)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE} \\ 0.92 \pm 0.11 \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{l} \Gamma_2/\Gamma \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ ZHUKOVA \qquad 23 \qquad \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \\ e^+ e^- \to \tau(5S) \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(D^0/\bar{D}^0 anything)/\Gamma(D_s^+ anything) \\ \text{VALUE} \\ 0.416 \pm 0.018 \pm 0.092 \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{l} \Gamma_3/\Gamma_2 \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ ZHUKOVA \qquad 23 \qquad \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \\ e^+ e^- \to \tau(5S) \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(\ell\nu\ell X)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-2}) \\ 9.6 \pm 0.8 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{l} \Gamma_4/\Gamma \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ 1 \text{ OSWALD} \qquad 13 \qquad \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \\ e^+ e^- \to \tau(5S) \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} 9.6 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.7 \\ 9.5^{+2.5}_{-1.0} \pm 1.1 \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{l} 1 \text{ OSWALD} \qquad 13 \qquad \text{TECN} \\ 2 \text{ LEES} \qquad 12\Lambda \qquad \text{BARR} \\ \text{COMMENT} \\ e^+ e^- \to \tau(5S) \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(e^+ \nu X^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-2}) \\ 9.1 \pm 0.5 \pm 0.6 \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{l} \Gamma_5/\Gamma \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ OSWALD \qquad 13 \qquad \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \\ e^+ e^- \to \tau(5S) \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(\mu^+ \nu X^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{VALUE (units } 10^{-2}) \\ 10.2 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.8 \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{l} \Gamma_6/\Gamma \\ \text{DOCUMENT ID} \\ OSWALD \qquad 13 \qquad \text{TECN} \\ \text{COMMENT} \\ e^+ e^- \to \tau(5S) \end{array} $$

$$ \begin{array}{l} \Gamma(D_S^- \ell^+ \nu \text{anything})/\Gamma_{\text{total}} \\ \text{The values and averages in this section serve only to show what values result if one assumes our } B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0). \text{ They cannot be thought of as measurements since the underlying product branching fractions were also used to determine } B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) \text{ as described in the note on "Production and Decay of b-Flavored Hadrons."} \end{array} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>8.1 ± 1.3</strong></td><td><strong>OUR AVERAGE</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8.2 ± 0.2 ± 1.5</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>OSWALD</td><td>15 BELL e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → T(5S)</td></tr><tr><td>7.6 ± 1.2 ± 2.1</td><td></td><td>134</td><td>2</td><td>BUSKULIC e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>10.7 ± 4.3 ± 2.9</td><td></td><td></td><td>3</td><td>ABREU e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr><tr><td>10.3 ± 3.6 ± 2.8</td><td></td><td>18</td><td>4</td><td>ACTON e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote n="1">1 WANG 22 selects the $B_S$ events by tagging the accompanying $B_S$ via partial reconstruction of the semileptonic decays $B_S \to D_S X \ell^+ \nu$.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">2 The extraction of this result takes into account the correlation between the measurements of $B(\tau(5S) \to D_S X)$ and $B(\tau(5S) \to D^0 X)$.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">3 BUSKULIC 96e separate cτ̄ and bτ̄ sources of $D_S^+$ mesons using a lifetime tag, subtract generic $b\bar{b} \to W^+ \to D_S^+$ events, and obtain $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) \times B(B_S^0 \to D_S^-)$ anything) = 0.088 ± 0.020 ± 0.020 assuming $B(D_S \to \phi\pi) = (3.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$ and PDG 1994 values for the relative partial widths to other $D_S$ channels. We evaluate using our current values $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) = 0.107 \pm 0.014$ and $B(D_S \to \phi\pi) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)$ and $B(D_S \to \phi\pi)$.</footnote>

<footnote n="4">4 ACTON 92n assume that excess of 147 ± 48 $D_S^0$ events over that expected from $B^0$, $B^+$, and $c\bar{c}$ is all from $B_S^0$ decay. The product branching fraction is measured to be $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)B(B_S^0 \to D_S^-)$ anything) × $B(D_S^- \to \phi\pi^-) = (5.9 \pm 1.9 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-3}$. We evaluate using our current values $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) = 0.107 \pm 0.014$ and $B(D_S^- \to \phi\pi^-) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)$ and $B(D_S^- \to \phi\pi^-)$.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">1 The measurement corresponds to the average of the electron and muon branching fractions.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">2 The measurement corresponds to a branching fraction where the lepton originates from bottom decay and is the average between the electron and muon branching fractions. LEES 12A uses the correlation of the production of $\phi$ mesons in association with a lepton in $e^+ e^-$ data taken at center-of-mass energies between 10.54 and 11.2 GeV.</footnote>

<footnote>• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •</footnote>

<footnote n="13">13 ± 4 ± 4 27 5 BUSKULIC 92E ALEP e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> → Z</footnote>

<footnote n="2">2 BUSHKULIC 950 use $D_S^-$ $\ell$ correlations. The measured product branching ratio is $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) \times B(B_S \to D_S^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{anything}) = (0.82 \pm 0.09_{-0.14}^{+0.13})\%$ assuming $B(D_S \to \phi\pi) = (3.5 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-2}$ and PDG 1994 values for the relative partial widths to the six other $D_S$ channels used in this analysis. Combined with results from $\tau(4S)$ experiments this can be used to extract $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) = (11.0 \pm 1.2^{+2.5}_{-2.6})\%$. We evaluate using our current values $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) = 0.107 \pm 0.014$ and $B(D_S \to \phi\pi) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)$ and $B(D_S \to \phi\pi)$.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">3 ABREU 92M measured muons only and obtained product branching ratio $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) \times B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) \times B(B_S \to D_S^+ \nu_\ell \text{anything}) \times B(D_S \to \phi\pi) = (18 \pm 8) \times 10^{-5}$. We evaluate using our current values $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0) = 0.107 \pm 0.014$ and $B(D_S \to \phi\pi) = 0.036 \pm 0.009$. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)$ and $B(D_S \to \phi\pi)$. We use $B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = 2B(Z \to b\bar{b}) = 2 \times (0.2212 \pm 0.0019)$.</footnote>

<footnote n="4">4 ACTON 92N is measured using $D_S \to \phi\pi^+$ and $K^*(892)^0 \to K^+$ events. The product branching fraction measured is measured to be $B(\bar{b} \to B_S^0)B(B_S^0 \to D_S^- \ell^+ \nu_\ell \text{anything}) \times B(D_S^- \to \phi\pi^-) = (3.9 \pm 1.1 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-4}$. We evaluate using our current values</footnote>
B(的大括号→ B⁰₅) = 0.107 ± 0.014 and B(D₅→ φπ) = 0.036 ± 0.009. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(的大括号→ B⁰₅) and B(D₅→ φπ).

⁵BUSKULIC 92E is measured using D₅→ φπ⁺ and K*(892)⁰K⁺ events. They use 2.7 ± 0.7% for the φπ⁺ branching fraction. The average product branching fraction is measured to be B(的大括号→ B⁰₅)B(B⁰₅→ D⁻₅ℓ⁺νₑ anything) = 0.020 ± 0.0055⁺⁰.⁰⁰⁵⁻⁰.⁰⁰⁶⁻⁰.⁰⁰⁶. We evaluate using our current values B(的大括号→ B⁰₅) = 0.107 ± 0.014 and B(D₅→ φπ) = 0.036 ± 0.009. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(的大括号→ B⁰₅) and B(D₅→ φπ). Superseded by BUSKULIC 950.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ \ell^+ \nu_e \text{ anything}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_8 / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.4 ± 0.4 ± 1.0</td><td>1</td><td>OSWALD</td><td>15 BELL</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Obtains B₅→ D_s⁺Xeν, and D_s⁺Xµν separately, but combines them by assuming systematic uncertainties are fully correlated, except for the one on lepton identification. The third uncertainty adds in quadrature systematic uncertainties from external sources (number of B₅ events, and D_s⁺ branching fractions). OSWALD 15 also measures the cross-section σ(e⁺e⁻ → B_s⁺(*)B_s⁺(*)) = 53.8 ± 1.4 ± 5.3 pb at √s = 10.86 GeV.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ \mu^+ \nu_e) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_9 / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.31 ± 0.20 ± 0.07</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20E LHCB</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20E reports [Γ(B⁰₅→ D⁻₅μ⁺νₑ)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁰₅→ D⁻ℓ⁺νₑ)] = 1.09 ± 0.05 ± 0.06 ± 0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰₅→ D⁻ℓ⁺νₑ) = (2.12 ± 0.06) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^+ \mu^+ \nu_e) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{10} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.2 ± 0.5 ± 0.1</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20E LHCB</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20E reports [Γ(B⁰₅→ D_s⁺μ⁺νₑ)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁰₅→ D⁺(2010)⁻ℓ⁺νₑ)] = 1.06 ± 0.05 ± 0.07 ± 0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰₅→ D⁺(2010)⁻ℓ⁺νₑ) = (4.90 ± 0.12) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^- \mu^+ \nu_e) / \Gamma(D_s^- \mu^+ \nu_e) \qquad \Gamma_9 / \Gamma_{10} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.464 ± 0.013 ± 0.043</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>20E LHCB</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 20E value is not independent of other reported measurements.

$$ \Gamma(D_{s1}(2536)^- \mu^+ \nu_e, D_{s1}^- \to D^0 K^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{11} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.7 ± 0.7 ± 0.2</td><td>1</td><td>ABAZOV</td><td>09G D0</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ABAZOV 09G reports [Γ(B⁰₅→ Ds₁(2536)⁻μ⁺νₑ, D_s₁⁻→ D⁺⁻K⁰₅)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(B⁻→ B⁰₅)] = (2.66 ± 0.52 ± 0.45) × 10⁻⁴ which we divide by our best value B(B⁻→ B⁰₅) = (10.0 ± 0.8) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D_{s1}(2536)^- \chi \mu^+ \nu_e, D_{s1}^- \to D^0 K^+) / \Gamma(D_s^- \ell^+ \nu_e \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{12} / \Gamma_7 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5.4 ± 1.2 ± 0.5</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>11A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_{s2}(2573)^- \chi \mu^+ \nu_e, D_{s2}^- \to D^0 K^+) / \Gamma(D_s^- \ell^+ \nu_e \text{ anything}) \qquad \Gamma_{13} / \Gamma_7 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.3 ± 1.0 ± 0.4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>11A LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_{s1}(2536)^- \chi \mu^+ \nu_e, D_{s1}^- \to D^0 K^+) / \Gamma(D_{s2}(2573)^- \chi \mu^+ \nu_e, D_{s2}^- \to D^0 K^+) \qquad \Gamma_{12} / \Gamma_{13} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.61 ± 0.14 ± 0.05</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>11A LHCB</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹Not independent of other AAIJ 11A measurements.

$$ \Gamma(K^- \mu^+ \nu_e) / \Gamma(D_s^- \mu^+ \nu_e) \qquad \Gamma_{14} / \Gamma_9 $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.89 ± 0.21 ± 0.25</td><td>1, 2</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21G LHCB</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 21G measures B(B⁰₅→ K⁻μ⁺νₑ)/B(B⁰₅→ D_s⁻μ⁺νₑ) = (4.89 ± 0.21⁺⁰.²⁰² ± 0.14) × 10⁻³ over the whole q² range, where the last uncertainty is due to the D_s⁻ → K⁻K⁻π⁻ branching fraction.

²AAIJ 21G reports this branching ratio for q² < 7 GeV² as (1.66 ± 0.08 ± 0.07 ± 0.05) × 10⁻³ and for q² > 7 GeV² as (3.25 ± 0.21⁺⁰.¹⁶² ± 0.17) × 10⁻³.

$$ \Gamma(K^- \mu^+ \nu_e) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{14} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.06 ± 0.05 ± 0.08</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21G LHCB</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹The total systematic error includes D_s⁻ branching fractions, B⁰₅ lifetime, |V<sub>cb</sub>|, and B⁰₅ → D_s⁻ form factor integral uncertainties.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^- \pi^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{15} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>EVTS</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

$$ \begin{array}{l} 2.98 \pm 0.14 \text{ OUR FIT} \\ 2.97 \pm 0.13 \text{ OUR AVERAGE} \end{array} $$

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.96 ± 0.10 ± 0.09</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>21Y LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>3.6 ± 0.5 ± 0.5</td><td>2</td><td>LOUVOT</td><td>09 BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(5S)</td></tr><tr><td>2.8 ± 0.6 ± 0.1</td><td>3</td><td>ABULENCIA</td><td>07C CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.95 ± 0.05</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AG LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 21Y</td></tr><tr><td>6.8 ± 2.2 ± 1.6</td><td>4</td><td>DRUTSKOY</td><td>07A BELL</td><td>Repl. by LOUVOT 09</td></tr><tr><td>3.3 ± 1.1 ± 0.1</td><td>5</td><td>ABULENCIA</td><td>06J CDF</td><td>Repl. by ABULENCIA 07C</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;130</td><td>6</td><td>AKERS</td><td>94J OPAL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → Z</td></tr><tr><td>seen</td><td>1</td><td>BUSKULIC</td><td>93G ALEP</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → Z</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 21Y reports [Γ(B⁰₅→ D_s⁻π⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁰₅→ D⁻π⁺)] = 1.18 ± 0.04 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰₅→ D⁻π⁺) = (2.51 ± 0.08) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²LOUVOT 09 reports (3.67⁺⁰.³⁵⁻⁰.⁶⁵) × 10⁻³ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰₅→ D_s⁻π⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(Γ(10860) → B_s⁺(*)B_s⁺(*))] assuming B(Γ(10860) → B_s⁺(*)B_s⁺(*)) = (19.5 ± 2.6) × 10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(Γ(10860) → B_s⁺(*)B_s⁺(*)) = (20.1 ± 3.1) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

³ABULENCIA 07C reports [Γ(B⁰₅→ D_s⁻π⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁰₅→ D⁻π⁺)] = 1.13 ± 0.08 ± 0.23 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰₅→ D⁻π⁺) = (2.51 ± 0.08) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁴AAIJ 12AG reports (2.95 ± 0.05 ± 0.17⁺⁰.¹⁸⁻⁰.²²) × 10⁻³ where the last uncertainty comes from the semileptonic f_s/f_d measurement. We combined the systematics in quadrature.

⁵ABULENCIA 06J reports [Γ(B⁰₅→ D_s⁻π⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁰₅→ D⁻π⁺)] = 1.32 ± 0.18 ± 0.38 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰₅→ D⁻π⁺) = (2.51 ± 0.08) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

⁶AKERS 94J sees ≤ 6 events and measures the limit on the product branching fraction f(B⁻→ B⁰₅)B(B⁰₅→ D_s⁻π⁺) < 1.3% at CL = 90%. We divide by our current value B(B⁻→ B⁰₅) = 0.105.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^- \rho^+) / \Gamma(D_s^- \pi^+) \qquad \Gamma_{16} / \Gamma_{15} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.3 ± 0.4 ± 0.2</td><td>LOUVOT</td><td>10 BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(5S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^- \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{17} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>6.1 ± 1.0 OUR FIT</td><td>1</td><td>ABULENCIA</td><td>07C CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>6.3 ± 1.4 ± 0.6</td><td>1</td><td>ABULENCIA</td><td>07C CDF</td><td>p̄p̄ at 1.96 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹ABULENCIA 07C reports [Γ(B⁰₅→ D_s⁻π⁺π⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁰₅→ D⁻π⁺π⁺)] = 1.05 ± 0.10 ± 0.22 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰₅→ D⁻π⁺π⁺) = (6.0 ± 0.6) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D_s^- \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma(D_s^- \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{17} / \Gamma_{15} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.05 ± 0.33 OUR FIT</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>11E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr><tr><td>2.01 ± 0.37 ± 0.20</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>11E LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_{s1}(2536)^- \pi^+ , D_{s1}^- \to D_s^- \pi^+ \pi^-) / \Gamma(D_s^- \pi^+ \pi^-) \qquad \Gamma_{18} / \Gamma_{17} $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-3</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4.0 ± 1.0 ± 0.4</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>12AX LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

$$ \Gamma(D_s^- K^\pm) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{19} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.25 ± 0.12 OUR FIT</td><td>1</td><td>LOUVOT</td><td>09 BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(5S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><tbody><tr><td>2.3 +1.2 +0.4 -1.0</td><td>1</td><td>LOUVOT</td><td>09 BELL</td><td>e⁺e⁻ → T(5S)</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹LOUVOT 09 reports (2.4⁺¹.²⁻¹.⁰ ± 0.42) × 10⁻⁴ from a measurement of [Γ(B⁰₅→ D_s⁻K⁺)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] × [B(Γ(10860) → B_s⁺(*)B_s⁺(*))] assuming B(Γ(10860) → B_s⁺(*)B_s⁺(*)) = (19.5 ± 2.6) × 10⁻², which we rescale to our best value B(Γ(10860) → B_s⁺(*)B_s⁺(*)) = (20.1 ± 3.1) × 10⁻². Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(D_{s1}(2536)\mp K^\pm, D_{s1}^- \to D^* (2007)^0 K^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{20} / \Gamma $$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2.48 ± 0.18 ± 0.22</td><td>1</td><td>AAIJ</td><td>23AY LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

¹AAIJ 23AY reports [Γ(B⁰₅→ Ds₁(2536)⁻K⁺, D_s₁⁻→ D⁺(2007)⁰K⁻)/Γ<sub>total</sub>] / [B(B⁰₅→ D⁰K⁺K⁻)] = 0.409 ± 0.019 ± 0.022 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰₅→ D⁰K⁺K⁻) = (6.1 ± 0.5) × 10⁻⁵. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.
# Meson Particle Listings

## B⁰₃₃

### Γ(D̄₅K⁺)/Γ(D̄₅π⁺)

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

#### 7.55±0.24 OUR FIT

#### 7.55±0.24 OUR AVERAGE

7.52±0.15±0.19

9.7 ±1.8 ±0.9

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

6.46±0.43±0.25

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 15AC LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

AALTONEN 09AQ CDF p̄ at 1.96 TeV

AAIJ 12AG LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AC

### Γ(D̄₅K⁺π⁺π⁻)/Γ(D̄₅π⁺π⁺π⁻)

VALUE (units 10⁻²)

5.2±0.5±0.3

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 12AX LHCB pp at 7 TeV

### Γ(D̄₅D̄₅)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

#### 4.4±0.5 OUR AVERAGE

4.0±0.2±0.5

5.8±1.1±1.3

5.4±0.8±0.8

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

10.3+3.9+2.6

10.4+3.5+1.1

<67 90

DRUTSKOY 07A BELL Repl. by ESEN 10

¹Uses B(B⁰ → D⁻D⁺) = (7.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³.

²Use T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅ decays assuming B(T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (17.1 ± 3.0)% and Γ(T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅) / Γ(T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (87.0 ± 1.7)%.

³AALTONEN 12c reports (f_s/f_d) (B(B⁰ → D⁺D⁻D̄₅) / B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅)) = 0.183 ± 0.021 ± 0.017. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅) = (7.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³ and divide by our best value of f_s/f_d, where 1/2 f_s/f_d = 0.1230 ± 0.0115. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.

⁴Uses T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅ assuming B(T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (19.3 ± 2.9)% and Γ(T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅) / Γ(T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (90.1±3.8)%.

⁵AALTONEN 08f reports [Γ(B⁰ → D⁺D⁻D̄₅)/Γtotal] / [B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅)] = 1.44+0.48-0.44 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅) = (7.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

### Γ(D̄₅D⁺)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴)

2.8±0.4±0.3

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

3.6±0.6±0.5

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 14AA LHCB pp at 7 TeV

2 AAIJ 13AP LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 14AA

¹AAIJ 14AA reports [Γ(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅)/Γtotal] / [B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅)] = 0.038 ± 0.004 ± 0.003 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅) = (7.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value..

²Uses B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅) = (7.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³.

### Γ(D⁺D⁻)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴)

2.2±0.4±0.4

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 13AP LHCB pp at 7 TeV

¹Uses B(B⁰ → D⁻D⁺) = (2.11 ± 0.31) × 10⁻⁴ and B(B⁺ → D̄₀D̄₅) = (10.1 ± 1.7) × 10⁻³.

### Γ(D⁰D̄⁰)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴)

1.9±0.3±0.4

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 13AP LHCB pp at 7 TeV

¹Uses B(B⁰ → D⁻D⁺) = (2.11 ± 0.31) × 10⁻⁴ and B(B⁺ → D̄⁰D̄₅) = (10.1 ± 1.7) × 10⁻³.

### Γ(D⁺D⁻)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻⁴)

2.14±0.28+0.17-0.16

1,2 AAIJ 23J LHCB pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV

¹AAIJ 23 reports [Γ(B⁰ → D⁺D⁻)/Γtotal] / [B(B⁰ → D⁺(2010)⁺D⁺(2010)⁻)] = 0.269 ± 0.032 ± 0.011 ± 0.008 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰ → D⁺(2010)⁺D⁺(2010)⁻) = (8.0 ± 0.6) × 10⁻⁴. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Uses average B⁰ lifetime of 1.5215 ps.

### Γ(D̄₅π⁺)/Γ(D̄₅π⁺)

VALUE

0.65+0.15-0.13

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

LOUVOT 10 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(5S)

### Γ(D̄₅K⁺)/Γ(D̄₅π⁺)

VALUE

0.068±0.005+0.003-0.002

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

AAIJ 15AD LHCB pp at 7, 8 TeV

### Γ(D̄₅ρ⁺)/Γ(D̄₅π⁺)

VALUE

3.2±0.6±0.3

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

LOUVOT 10 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(5S)

### Γ(D̄₅ρ⁺)/Γ(D̄₅ρ⁺)

VALUE

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

1.4±0.3±0.1

¹ LOUVOT 10 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(5S)

¹Not independent of other LOUVOT 10 measurements.

### [Γ(D̄₅D̄₅) + Γ(D̄₅D̄₅)]/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

#### 13.9±1.7 OUR AVERAGE

13.6±1.0±1.4

17.6+2.3-2.2±4.0

12.5±1.7±1.8

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

1 AAIJ 16P LHCB pp at 7 TeV

2 ESEN 13 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(5S)

3 AALTONEN 12C CDF p̄ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

27.5+8.3-7.1±6.9

4 ESEN 10 BELL Repl. by ESEN 13

<121 90

DRUTSKOY 07A BELL Repl. by ESEN 10

¹AAIJ 16P reports [Γ(B⁰ → D̄₅D̄₅) + Γ(D̄₅D̄₅)]/Γtotal] / [B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅)] = 1.88 ± 0.08 ± 0.12 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅) = (7.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Use T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅ decays assuming B(T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (17.1 ± 3.0)% and Γ(T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅) / Γ(T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (87.0 ± 1.7)%.

³AALTONEN 12c reports (f_s/f_d) (B(B⁰ → D̄₅D̄₅) + B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅)) / B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅) = 0.424 ± 0.046 ± 0.035. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅) = (7.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³ and divide by our best value of f_s/f_d, where 1/2 f_s/f_d = 0.1230 ± 0.0115. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.

⁴Uses T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅ assuming B(T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (19.3 ± 2.9)% and Γ(T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅) / Γ(T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (90.1+3.8-4.0)%.

### Γ(D̄₅D̄₅)/Γtotal

VALUE (units 10⁻³)

#### 14.4±2.1 OUR AVERAGE

12.7±1.3±1.4

19.8+3.3-3.1±5.2

19.2±2.9±2.7

Error includes scale factor of 1.1.

1 AAIJ 16P LHCB pp at 7 TeV

2 ESEN 13 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(5S)

3 AALTONEN 12C CDF p̄ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

30.8+12.2+8.5-10.4-8.6

4 ESEN 10 BELL Repl. by ESEN 13

<257 90

DRUTSKOY 07A BELL Repl. by ESEN 10

¹AAIJ 16P reports [Γ(B⁰ → D̄₅D̄₅D̄₅) / Γtotal] / [B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅)] = 1.76 ± 0.11 ± 0.14 which we multiply by our best value B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅) = (7.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

²Use T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅ decays assuming B(T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (17.1 ± 3.0)% and Γ(T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅) / Γ(T(5S) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (87.0 ± 1.7)%.

³AALTONEN 12c reports (f_s/f_d) (B(B⁰ → D̄₅D̄₅D̄₅) / B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅)) = 0.654 ± 0.072 ± 0.065. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B⁰ → D⁻D̄₅) = (7.2 ± 0.8) × 10⁻³ and divide by our best value of f_s/f_d, where 1/2 f_s/f_d = 0.1230 ± 0.0115. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.

⁴Uses T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅ assuming B(T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (19.3 ± 2.9)% and Γ(T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅) / Γ(T(10860) → B̄₅B̄₅) = (90.1+3.8-4.0)%.

### Γ(D̄₅D̄₅)/Γtotal

VALUE (%) CL%

#### 4.5 ±1.4 OUR EVALUATION

#### 3.4 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE

3.07±0.22±0.33

4.32+0.42+1.04-0.39-1.03

3.7 ±0.4 ±0.5

3.5 ±1.0 ±1.1

DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT

(Produced by HFLAV)

1 AAIJ 16P LHCB pp at 7 TeV

2 ESEN 13 BELL e⁺e⁻ → T(5S)

3 AALTONEN 12C CDF p̄ at 1.96 TeV

4 ABAZOV 09I D0 p̄ at 1.96 TeV

5,6 BARATE 00K ALEP e⁺e⁻ → Z

14 ±6 ±3
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>6.85<sup>+1.53</sup><sub>-1.30</sub></td><td>7,8 ESEN</td><td>10</td><td>BELL</td><td>Repl. by ESEN 13</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>3.9<sup>+1.9</sup><sub>-1.7</sub></td><td>4 ABAZOV</td><td>07Y</td><td>D0</td><td>Repl. by ABAZOV 09I</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>&lt;0.218</td><td>90</td><td>BARATE</td><td>98Q</td><td>ALEP</td><td>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> → Z</td></tr></table>

1 AAIJ 16p reports $[\Gamma(B^0_S \to D^*(+)D^-(^-)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to D^-D^+_S)] = 4.24 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.27$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to D^-D^+_S) = (7.2 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Use $\Gamma(5S) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^*$ decays assuming $B(\Gamma(5S) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^*) = (17.1 \pm 3.0)\%$ and $\Gamma(\tau(5S) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^*) / \Gamma(\tau(5S) \to B_S^*(^-)\bar{B}_S^*) = (87.0 \pm 1.7)\%$.

3 AALTONEN 12c reports $(f_S/f_d)(B(B^0_S \to D^*(+)D^-(^-)) / B(B^0 \to D^-D^+_S)) = 1.261 \pm 0.095 \pm 0.112$. We multiply this result by our best value of $B(B^0 \to D^-D^+_S) = (7.2 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-3}$ and divide by our best value of $f_S/f_d$, where $1/2 f_S/f_d = 0.1230 \pm 0.0115$. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using our best values.

4 Uses the final states where $D_S^+ \to \phi\pi^+$ and $D_S^- \to \phi\mu^-\nu_\mu$.

5 Reports $B(B^0_S(\text{short}) \to D_S^*(+)D_S^-(^-)) = (0.23 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.05) \cdot [0.17/B(D_S \to \phi\chi)]^2$ assuming $B(B^0_S \to B^0_S(\text{short})) = 50\%$. We use our best value of $B(D_S \to \phi\chi) = 15.7 \pm 1.0\%$ to obtain the quoted result.

6 Uses $\phi\phi$ correlations from $B_S^*(\text{short}) \to D_S^*(+)D_S^-(^-)$.

7 Sum of exclusive $B_S \to D_S^+D_S^-$, $B_S \to D_S^+D_S^-$ and $B_S \to D_S^+D_S^-$.

8 Uses $\tau(10860) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^*$ assuming $B(\tau(10860) \to B_S^*(^-)\bar{B}_S^*) = (19.3 \pm 2.9)\%$ and $\Gamma(\tau(10860) \to B_S^*\bar{B}_S^*) / \Gamma(\tau(10860) \to B_S^*(^-)\bar{B}_S^*) = (90.1 \pm 3.8)\%$.

$$ \Gamma(D^{*-}D_S^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{35}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>3.9±0.6±0.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21S</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 AAIJ 21s reports $[\Gamma(B^0_S \to D^{*-}D_S^+) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to D^{*(2010)}D_S^+)] = 0.049 \pm 0.006 \pm 0.0036$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to D^{*(2010)}D_S^+) = (8.0 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ [\Gamma(D^{*+}D^{-}) + \Gamma(D^{*-}D^{+})] / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad (\Gamma_{25} + \Gamma_{26}) / \Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>8.4±1.1±0.8</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>21N</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8, 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 AAIJ 21N reports $[\Gamma(B^0_S \to D^{*+}D^{-}) + \Gamma(B_S^*(^-)D^{*-}D_S^+)] / \Gamma_{\text{total}} / [B(B^0 \to D^{\pm}D^{\mp}(\text{CP-averaged}))] = 0.137 \pm 0.017 \pm 0.006$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to D^{\pm}D^{\mp}(\text{CP-averaged})) = (6.1 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{36}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>2.8±1.0±0.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16C</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Measured and normalized to the $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^0_S$ decay with $f_S/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$. Signal significance is 4.4 standard deviations.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^0) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{37}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>4.3±0.5±0.7</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>16C</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Measured and normalized to the $B^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^0_S$ decay with $f_S/f_d = 0.259 \pm 0.015$.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{38}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>10.4±1.1±0.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>13AQ</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 AAIJ 13AQ reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{\pi}^{+}\bar{\pi}^{-})] = (1.18 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.12)$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{\pi}^{+}\bar{\pi}^{-}) = (8.8 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^*(2007)\bar{K}^{-+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{39}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>7.3±0.6±2.5</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>22N</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 13 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 AAIJ 22N reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^*(2007)\bar{K}^{-+}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to \bar{D}^*(2007)\bar{\pi}^{+}\bar{\pi}^{-})] = (1.178 \pm 0.029 \pm 0.091 \pm 0.037$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to \bar{D}^*(2007)\bar{\pi}^{+}\bar{\pi}^{-}) = (6.2 \pm 2.2) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^*(892)\bar{\rho}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{40}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>4.4 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>4.29 ± 0.09 ± 0.65</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>4.7 ± 1.2 ± 0.3</td><td>2 AAIJ</td><td>11D</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7 TeV</td></tr></table>

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

<table><tr><td>3.5 ± 0.4 ± 0.4</td><td>3 AAIJ</td><td>13BX</td><td>LHCB</td><td>Repl. by AAIJ 14BH</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays.

2 AAIJ 11D reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^*(892)\bar{\rho}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{\rho}^0)] = 1.48 \pm 0.34 \pm 0.19$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{\rho}^0) = (3.21 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-4}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3 AAIJ 13BX reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^*(892)\bar{\rho}) / \Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^*(892)\bar{\rho})] = 7.8 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.3 \pm 0.6$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^*(892)\bar{\rho}) = (4.5 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^*(1410)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{41}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>38.6±11.4±33.3</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^0(1430)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{42}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>30.0±2.4±6.8</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays. Corresponds to the resonant $K^0(1430)$ part of LASS parametrization.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^2(1430)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{43}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>11.1±1.8±3.8</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^*(1680)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{44}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>\text{VALUE} (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;7.8</td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^0(1950)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{45}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>\text{VALUE} (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;11</td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^3(1780)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{46}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>\text{VALUE} (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;2.6</td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^4(2045)) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{47}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>\text{VALUE} (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</td><td>CL%</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;3.1</td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+} (\text{non-resonant})) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{48}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>20.6±3.8±7.3</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays. Corresponds to the non-resonant part of the LASS parametrization.

$$ \Gamma(D_{S2}^*(2573)\pi^+, D_{S2}^* \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{49}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>25.7±0.7±4.0</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D_{S1}^*(2700)\pi^+, D_{S1}^* \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{50}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>1.6±0.4±0.7</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D_{S1}^*(2860)\pi^+, D_{S1}^* \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{51}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>5.0±1.2±3.4</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(D_{S3}^*(2860)\pi^+, D_{S3}^* \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{52}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>2.2±0.1±0.6</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BH</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>

1 Uses Dalitz plot analysis of $B_S^0 \to \bar{D}^0\bar{K}^{-+}$ decays.

$$ \Gamma(\bar{D}^0\bar{K}^+\bar{K}^-) / \Gamma_{\text{total}} \qquad \Gamma_{53}/\Gamma $$

<table><tr><td>5.6±0.7±0.5</td><td>DOCUMENT ID</td><td>TECN</td><td>COMMENT</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>18AZ</td><td>LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></table>
$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\bar{K}^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ \qquad $\Gamma_{66}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-5</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

4.14±0.18±0.35

1 AAIJ

15AV LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

4.4 +0.5 -0.4

2 AAIJ

12AP LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 15AV

9 ±4 ±1

3 AALTONEN

11A CDF

p$\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

1 AAIJ 15AV result combines two measurements with different normalizing modes of $B^0 \to J/\psi K^*(892)^0$ and $B_S^0 \to J/\psi \phi$.

2 AAIJ 12AP reports $B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\bar{K}^*(892)^0)/B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0) = (3.43^{+0.34}_{-0.36} \times 10^{-2}$ and $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0) = (1.29 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.13) \times 10^{-3}$ after correcting for the contribution from $K\pi$ S-wave beneath the $K^*$ peak.

3 AALTONEN 11A reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\bar{K}^*(892)^0)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] \times [B(B_S^0 \to B_S^0)] / [B(B_S^0 \to B_S^0)] / [B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0)] = 0.0168 \pm 0.0024 \pm 0.0068$ which we multiply or divide by our best values $B(B_S^0 \to B_S^0) = (10.0 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(B_S^0 \to B_S^0) = (40.8 \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-2}$, $B(B^0 \to J/\psi(1S)K^*(892)^0) = (1.27 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-3}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ \qquad $\Gamma_{67}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

3.3 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE

3.2 +0.4 -0.5

1 AAIJ

13A LHCB

pp at 7 TeV

3.71±0.61 +0.85

2 LI

12 BELL

$e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

1 AAIJ 13A reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}}] / [B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\rho^0)] = 12.7 \pm 1.1^{+0.5+1.0}_{-1.3-0.9}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\rho^0) = (2.55^{+0.18}_{-0.16}) \times 10^{-5}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Observed for the first time with significances over 10 $\sigma$. The second error is total systematic uncertainties including the error on $N(B_S^{(+)}/B_S^{(-)})$.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta')/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ \qquad $\Gamma_{67}/\Gamma_{64}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.87 ±0.06 OUR AVERAGE

0.902±0.072±0.045

1 AAIJ

15D LHCB

pp at 7, 8 TeV

0.90 ±0.09 +0.06

2 AAIJ

13A LHCB

pp at 7 TeV

0.73 ±0.14 ±0.02

2 LI

12 BELL

$e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S)$

1 Uses $J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-$, $\eta' \to \rho^0\gamma$, and $\eta' \to \eta\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

2 Strongly correlated with measurements of $\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta')/\Gamma$ and $\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\eta')/\Gamma$ reported in the same reference.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ \qquad $\Gamma_{68}/\Gamma_{61}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

19.4±1.5 OUR FIT

19.9±0.7±0.2

1 AAIJ

12AO LHCB

pp at 7 TeV

1 AAIJ 12AO reports $(19.79 \pm 0.47 \pm 0.52) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)]$ assuming $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (48.9 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_0(500), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)$ \qquad $\Gamma_{69}/\Gamma_{71}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.034</td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Reported first of two solutions using the full Dalitz analysis.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\rho, \rho \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)\pi^+\pi^-)$ \qquad $\Gamma_{70}/\Gamma_{68}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>CL%</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>&lt;0.017</td><td>90</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Reported first of two solutions using the full Dalitz analysis.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ \qquad $\Gamma_{71}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

1.24±0.15 OUR FIT

1.16 +0.31 +0.30

1 LI

11 BELL

$e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(5S)$

1 The second error includes both the detector systematic and the uncertainty in the number of produced $\Upsilon(5S) \to B_S^{(+)}/B_S^{(-)}$ pairs.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ \qquad $\Gamma_{71}/\Gamma$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

0.119 +0.013 -0.014 OUR FIT

0.110 +0.020 -0.018 OUR AVERAGE

Error includes scale factor of 2.5.

0.069±0.012±0.001

1 KHACHATRY...16Q

CMS

pp at 7 TeV

0.140 +0.026 -0.013

2,3 AAIJ

12AO LHCB

pp at 7 TeV

0.135±0.036±0.001

4 ABAZOV

12C D0

$p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

0.126±0.012±0.001

5 AALTONEN

11AB CDF

$p\bar{p}$ at 1.96 TeV

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

0.124 +0.026 -0.023 ±0.001

6 AAIJ

11 LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 12AO

1 KHACHATRY 16Q reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.140 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.023$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 AAIJ 12AO reports $(13.9 \pm 0.6^{+2.5}_{-1.2}) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.275 \pm 0.041 \pm 0.061$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

3 Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of $B_S \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays.

4 ABAZOV 12c reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.275 \pm 0.041 \pm 0.061$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

5 AALTONEN 11AB reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.257 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.014$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

6 AAIJ 11 reports $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)f_0(980), f_0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)] = 0.252^{+0.046+0.027}_{-0.032-0.033}$ which we multiply by our best value $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
0.110+0.020-0.018 (Error scaled by 2.5)

<figure><img src="image_640.png" /></figure>

Values above of weighted average, error, and scale factor are based upon the data in this ideogram only. They are not necessarily the same as our 'best' values, obtained from a least-squares constrained fit utilizing measurements of other (related) quantities as additional information.

(Confidence Level = 0.0003)

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.61 +0.05 -0.07</td><td>OUR FIT</td><td></td><td>Error includes scale factor of 2.1.</td></tr></tbody></table>

0.703±0.015 +0.004 -0.051

1 AAIJ

14BR LHCB

$\Gamma_{71}/\Gamma_{68}$

1 Reported first of two solutions using the full Dalitz analysis.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_2(1270), f_2 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ \qquad $\Gamma_{72}/\Gamma_{61}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (units 10<sup>-4</sup>)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead></table>

9.8 +3.4 -3.6 ±0.1

1,2 AAIJ

12AO LHCB

$\Gamma_{72}/\Gamma_{61}$

1 AAIJ 12AO reports $(0.098 \pm 0.033^{+0.015}_{-0.015}) \times 10^{-2}$ from a measurement of $[\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)f_2(1270), f_2 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma(B_S^0 \to J/\psi(1S)\phi)] / [B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-)]$ assuming $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (48.9 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$, which we rescale to our best value $B(\phi(1020) \to K^+K^-) = (49.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-2}$. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.

2 Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of $B_S \to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$ decays for the $f_2$ helicity state $\lambda = 0$.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_2(1270), f_2 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ \qquad $\Gamma_{73}/\Gamma_{68}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.36±0.07±0.03</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Reported first of two solutions using the full Dalitz analysis.

$\Gamma(J/\psi(1S)f_2(1270), f_2 \to \pi^+\pi^-)/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$ \qquad $\Gamma_{74}/\Gamma_{68}$

<table><thead><tr><th>VALUE (%)</th><th>DOCUMENT ID</th><th>TECN</th><th>COMMENT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0.52±0.15 +0.05 -0.02</td><td>1 AAIJ</td><td>14BR LHCB</td><td>pp at 7, 8 TeV</td></tr></tbody></table>

1 Reported first of two solutions using the full Dalitz analysis.