# Patient-Centric Microneedling Strategies for Skin Texture Optimization: Integrating Personalized Techniques, Molecular Mechanisms, and Clinical Outcomes

Reza Ghalamghash

► To cite this version:

Reza Ghalamghash. Patient-Centric Microneedling Strategies for Skin Texture Optimization: Integrating Personalized Techniques, Molecular Mechanisms, and Clinical Outcomes. 2025. hal-05160083

HAL Id: hal-05160083

https://hal.science/hal-05160083v1

Preprint submitted on 25 Jul 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Patient-Centric Microneedling Strategies for Skin Texture Optimization: Integrating Personalized Techniques, Molecular Mechanisms, and Clinical Outcomes

Reza Ghalamghash¹

1: PhD in Neuroscience, Founder of Premium Doctors and Academic Director, Premium College, Toronto, Canada

Corresponding author: Reza Ghalamghash. Tel: +1 (647) 822-9570, E-mail: Reza@PremiumDoctors.org

ORCID: 0009-0004-1745-1315

## Abstract

**Background:** Microneedling, a minimally invasive procedure, induces controlled micro-injuries to stimulate the body's natural wound healing cascade, promoting neocollagenesis and elastin production for skin texture optimization. This review explores patient-centric microneedling strategies, focusing on personalized techniques, molecular mechanisms, and clinical outcomes across indications like acne scars, rhytides, enlarged pores, and striae. The evolution of microneedling devices, from dermarollers to radiofrequency (RF) microneedling and 3D-printed hollow microneedles, enhances precision and therapeutic capabilities, particularly in transdermal drug delivery. Despite widespread adoption, challenges include a lack of standardized protocols and large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

**Methods:** A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, targeting peer-reviewed articles from 2015 to 2025, with foundational older works included if relevant. Keywords included “microneedling,” “collagen induction therapy,” “skin texture,” “personalized techniques,” “molecular mechanisms,” and “patient-centric.” Inclusion criteria prioritized studies on skin texture optimization, while non-academic sources and irrelevant studies were excluded. Data were extracted on study design, patient demographics, microneedling techniques, molecular findings, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction, then synthesized thematically and chronologically.
**Results:** Microneedling upregulates growth factors (e.g., TGF-β3, VEGF) and collagen types I, III, and VII, driving skin remodeling. Clinical studies report 51%-90% improvement in acne scar appearance, 1.23-grade improvement in wrinkle scores, and significant pore size reduction after RF microneedling. Personalized approaches, guided by patient assessment and tools like Visia Complexion Analysis, enhance outcomes. Combining microneedling with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), exosomes, or hyaluronic acid yields superior efficacy. Mild adverse effects (e.g., erythema, edema) are common, with minimal downtime. Limitations include study heterogeneity and inconsistent protocols.

**Conclusions:** Microneedling is a versatile, safe, and effective treatment for skin texture optimization, amplified by regenerative medicine and personalized strategies. Future directions include AI-driven treatment optimization, 3D skin mapping, and biomarker detection to predict responses. Rigorous RCTs, standardized protocols, and long-term studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base and advance patient-centric care in aesthetic dermatology.

**Keywords:** Microneedling, Skin Texture, Personalized Medicine, Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centric.

# 1. Introduction

## 1.1. Background on Skin Texture Concerns and Aesthetic Dermatology

The demand for youthful, refined skin has driven rapid growth in aesthetic dermatology, with non-invasive and minimally invasive treatments gaining prominence (Trovato et al., 2024). Younger demographics, including millennials and Generation Z, increasingly pursue “pre-juvenation” to prevent aging signs (Kurtycz, 2022). Skin texture irregularities, such as fine lines, acne scars, enlarged pores, and stretch marks, impact self-esteem and quality of life, prompting patients to favor treatments with minimal downtime and natural outcomes (Iriarte et al., 2017). Microneedling aligns with this trend, offering effective results with rapid recovery compared to laser resurfacing or deep chemical peels (Alster & Graham, 2018). This shift underscores the need for patient-centric approaches prioritizing convenience, efficacy, and realistic expectations, with providers ethically managing patient goals alongside biological healing constraints (Ramirez, 2023).
## 1.2. Significance of Microneedling in Dermatology

Microneedling, also known as collagen induction therapy (CIT) or percutaneous collagen induction (PCI), creates controlled micro-injuries to initiate a wound healing cascade, stimulating collagen and elastin production (Iriarte et al., 2017). Its safety, cost-effectiveness, and suitability for all skin types, including darker complexions, make it a versatile alternative to energy-based treatments, which risk post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) (Fabbrocini et al., 2016). Microneedling's non-thermal mechanism ensures broad applicability across dermatological conditions (Alster & Graham, 2018).

## 1.3. Evolution of Microneedling and Objectives of the Review

Since its inception for skin rejuvenation, microneedling's indications have expanded to include acne scars, burn scars, striae, melasma, alopecia, and hyperhidrosis when combined with RF (Iriarte et al., 2017). Its ability to enhance transdermal drug delivery via microchannels positions it as a platform for combination therapies, amplifying the efficacy of bioactive agents (Waghule et al., 2019). This review aims to analyze patient-centric microneedling strategies for skin texture optimization, integrating personalized techniques, molecular mechanisms, and clinical outcomes. It identifies knowledge gaps and proposes future research directions to advance evidence-based practice.

# 2. Methodology

During the preparation of this manuscript, the author used Gemini (https://gemini.google.com/) and Grok (https://grok.com/) to collect information and write articles. After using this tool/service, the author physically reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes full responsibility for the content of the publication.

## 2.1. Search Strategy and Databases

A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to ensure comprehensive coverage of peer-reviewed publications on microneedling from 2015 to May 2025, with foundational older works included if highly cited (Fabbrocini et al., 2016). Keywords and MeSH terms included "microneedling," "collagen induction therapy," "skin texture," "skin rejuvenation," "acne scars," "wrinkles,"
"personalized techniques," "molecular mechanisms," "clinical outcomes," "patient-centric," "PRP," "exosomes," "radiofrequency microneedling," "3D printed microneedles," "biomarkers," "AI," and "patient satisfaction" (Trovato et al., 2024).

## 2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

**Inclusion Criteria:**

* Peer-reviewed articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or authoritative books published from 2015 to 2025, with older foundational works included if relevant (El-Domyati et al., 2015).

* Studies focusing on microneedling for skin texture optimization, including acne scars, wrinkles, pores, striae, and rejuvenation (Iriarte et al., 2017).

* Articles detailing personalized techniques, molecular mechanisms, or clinical outcomes (Alster & Graham, 2018).

**Exclusion Criteria:**

* Non-academic sources (e.g., blogs, promotional materials) lacking empirical data (Singh & Yadav, 2016).

* Studies irrelevant to skin texture optimization or microneedling (e.g., systemic drug delivery) (Waghule et al., 2019).

* Case reports without broader context, unless providing unique insights (Fabbrocini et al., 2016).

## 2.3. Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were extracted on study design, participant demographics, microneedling parameters (device type, needle length, sessions), molecular findings, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Findings were synthesized thematically and chronologically to identify trends, consistencies, and gaps. Quantifiable data (e.g., improvement percentages, statistical significance) were compiled into tables. Study heterogeneity, including variable treatment regimens and outcome measures, limits meta-analysis and evidence-based recommendations (Dogra & Yadav, 2017).

# 3. Findings
**3.1. Fundamentals of Microneedling: Mechanisms of Action and Device Evolution**

**3.1.1. Mechanism of Action: Percutaneous Collagen Induction (PCI)**

Microneedling induces micro-injuries penetrating the epidermis and papillary dermis, triggering a wound healing cascade with three phases: injury (platelet/neutrophil release), proliferation (angiogenesis, fibroblast activation, type III collagen production), and maturation (type I collagen replacement) (Iriarte et al., 2017). This process yields neocollagenesis and elastin synthesis, enhancing skin firmness (Fabbrocini et al., 2016). Microchannels also improve topical agent penetration (Waghule et al., 2019).

**3.1.2. Evolution of Microneedling Devices and Techniques**

* **Manual Microneedling (Dermarollers)**: Early dermarollers with 0.5–1.5 mm needles rely on manual pressure, risking uneven penetration (Lima et al., 2017).

* **Motorized Microneedling (Dermapens)**: Dermapens offer adjustable needle depths (0.25–2.5 mm) for precise treatment of superficial or deep concerns (Alster & Graham, 2018).

* **Fractional Microneedling**: Creates micro-punctures in a patterned approach, promoting faster healing (Fabbrocini et al., 2016).

* **Radiofrequency (RF) Microneedling**: Combines micro-injuries with thermal energy for enhanced collagen production and tissue tightening (Gowda et al., 2021).

* **3D Printed Hollow Microneedles**: Enable transdermal delivery of high molecular weight drugs, offering regulated release (Barnum et al., 2020).

* **Other Variations**: Vacuum-assisted infusion and LED rollers expand therapeutic options (Iriarte et al., 2017).

**3.2. Molecular Mechanisms of Skin Remodeling Induced by Microneedling**

Micro-injuries upregulate growth factors (PDGF, TGF-α, TGF-β3, VEGF, EGF), with TGF-β3 preventing scarring (Fabbrocini et al., 2016). Fibroblast activation increases collagen and elastin synthesis, with a 40% epidermal thickening reported up to one year post-treatment (El-Domyati et al., 2015). Biopsies show elevated collagen types I, III, and VII, with a 400%
increase in collagen/elastin deposition six months post-treatment (Iriarte et al., 2017). These
changes persist for months, supporting sustained remodeling (Fabbrocini et al., 2016).

Integration with Regenerative Medicine Principles:

* **PRP/PRF:** Enhances tissue repair via growth factors (VEGF, PDGF) (Casabona & Marchese, 2017).

* **Exosomes/Stem Cell Media:** Improves wrinkles, elasticity, and pigmentation (Park et al., 2022).

* **Nanofat Grafting:** Boosts dermal cellularity and collagen density (Trovato et al., 2024).

* **Aesthetic Regenerative Scaffolds:** Materials like hyaluronic acid enhance hydration and rejuvenation (Casabona & Marchese, 2017).

## 3.3. Clinical Outcomes of Microneedling for Skin Texture Optimization

### 3.3.1. Efficacy for Various Indications

* **Acne Scars:** 51%-90% improvement in scar appearance, with 70% texture enhancement after three sessions (Waghmare & Waghmare, 2022; El-Domyati et al., 2015).

* **Wrinkles/Rhytides:** 1.23-grade improvement in global wrinkle scores, with 93.8% patient satisfaction at one month (Alexiades & Berube, 2018).

* **Enlarged Pores:** Significant pore score reduction (3.55 to 2.59) after RF microneedling (Huang et al., 2025).

* **Striae:** Improves elasticity and appearance (Iriarte et al., 2017).

* **Melasma:** Effective with topical agents, with lower PIH risk (Fabbrocini et al., 2016).

* **Rejuvenation:** 28%-30% improvement in texture and firmness (Lima et al., 2017).

### 3.3.2. Comparative Efficacy and Safety Profile

* **Vs. Laser Therapy:** Safer for darker skin, with less PIH (Fabbrocini et al., 2016).

* **Vs. Chemical Peels:** Superior for acne scars when combined (Casabona & Marchese, 2017).

* **Vs. Microcoring:** Less downtime (Ganceviciene et al., 2012). Adverse effects are mild (erythema, edema) and resolve quickly (Iriarte et al., 2017).
<table><caption>**Table 1: Summary of Clinical Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction for Key Microneedling Applications**</caption><thead><tr><td>Indication</td><td>Efficacy Metric / Outcome</td><td>Quantifiable Data / Patient Satisfaction</td><td>Notes</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Acne Scars (El-Domyati et al., 2015)</td><td>Scar Appearance Improvement</td><td>51%-60% improvement</td><td>6 sessions over 3 months</td></tr><tr><td>Acne Scars (Waghmare & Waghmare, 2022)</td><td>Scar & Depth Reduction</td><td>90% reduction</td><td>3 sittings</td></tr><tr><td>Wrinkles (Alexiades & Berube, 2018)</td><td>Global Wrinkle Score Improvement</td><td>Mean 1.23 grades</td><td>Day 150</td></tr><tr><td>Enlarged Pores (Huang et al., 2025)</td><td>Pore Score Reduction</td><td>3.55 to 2.59 (P &lt; 0.05)</td><td>3 RF sessions</td></tr><tr><td>Rejuvenation (Lima et al., 2017)</td><td>Texture, Smoothness</td><td>30% improvement</td><td>With active ingredients</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>**Table 2: Comparative Efficacy of Microneedling vs. Other Treatments**</caption><thead><tr><td>Treatment Modality</td><td>Condition</td><td>Efficacy / Outcome</td><td>Comparison to MN</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MN + Chemical Peels</td><td>Acne Scars</td><td>Superior improvement</td><td>Better than MN alone</td><td>Casabona & Marchese, 2017</td></tr><tr><td>MN vs. Laser</td><td>Acne Scars</td><td>Similar efficacy</td><td>Less PIH with MN</td><td>Fabbrocini et al., 2016</td></tr><tr><td>MN + PRP vs. MN</td><td>Acne Scars</td><td>82% vs. 62% efficacy</td><td>PRP enhances MN</td><td>Wazir et al., 2025</td></tr></tbody></table>

## 4. Personalized Microneedling Strategies and Patient-Centric Care

Thorough assessment ensures suitability, considering contraindications (e.g., active skin cancer, keloid history) and skin type (Lotfi & Lotfi, 2023). Microneedling's low PIH risk benefits darker skin (Fabbrocini et al., 2016). Consultations set realistic expectations (Apex Skin, 2024).
Adjustable parameters include needle length (0.25–3 mm), density, speed, and combination therapies (e.g., hyaluronic acid, minoxidil) (Skin Loft, 2024). Techniques ensure uniform micro-injury (Iriarte et al., 2017).

Tools like Visia Complexion Analysis and PRIMOS profilometry quantify improvements (Aesthetix Dermatology, 2024). Patient feedback on confidence and satisfaction guides adaptive planning, with 90% reporting enhanced confidence post-RF microneedling (Alexiades & Berube, 2018).

Collaborative consultations align treatment with patient goals, with education on procedure, side effects, and aftercare (e.g., SPF 30+) ensuring compliance (Bradceuticals, 2024). Experts like Dr. Reza Ghalamghash emphasize shared decision-making (Ghalamghash & Ghalamghash, 2024).

# 5. Challenges and Future Directions

## 5.1. Current Limitations in Research and Practice

Heterogeneous protocols and inconsistent outcome measures limit meta-analyses (Dogra & Yadav, 2017). Microneedle manufacturing challenges and regulatory barriers hinder scalability (Prausnitz & Langer, 2024).

## 5.2. Advancements in Technology and Personalized Approaches

* **AI/ML:** Optimizes protocols and predicts responses (Skin Loft, 2024).

* **3D Skin Mapping/Biomarkers:** Enhances diagnostics and personalization (Seck et al., 2025).

* **Novel Microneedles:** Biodegradable and sensor-integrated designs improve delivery (Prausnitz & Langer, 2024).

## 5.3. Ethical Considerations and Future Research

Social media-driven expectations necessitate ethical promotion (Trovato et al., 2024). Future research should prioritize RCTs, standardized protocols, and long-term follow-ups (Dogra & Yadav, 2017).
# 6. Conclusion

Microneedling is a cornerstone of aesthetic dermatology, leveraging wound healing for skin texture optimization. Its efficacy, amplified by PRP, exosomes, and personalized protocols, offers minimal downtime and broad applicability. AI, 3D mapping, and novel microneedles promise further advancements. Rigorous research is essential to standardize protocols and solidify evidence-based practice.

# References

Aesthetix Dermatology. (2024). *SkinPen microneedling*. https://aesthetixdermatology.com/skinpen-microneedling/

Alexiades, M., & Berube, P. (2018). Efficacy and safety of an automated microneedling device for the rejuvenation of facial skin. *Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology*, *11*(8), 34–40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6122507/

Alster, T. S., & Graham, P. M. (2018). Microneedling: A review and practical guide. *Dermatologic Surgery*, *44*(3), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001248

Apex Skin. (2024). The art and science of microneedling in dermatology and aesthetics. https://www.apexskin.com/2024/04/29/the-art-and-science-of-microneedling-in-dermatology-and-aesthetics/

Barnum, L., Samandari, M., Schmidt, T. A., & Tamayol, A. (2020). 3D-printed hydrogel-filled microneedle arrays for transdermal drug delivery. *Advanced Healthcare Materials*, *9*(22), e2000997. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000997

Bradceuticals. (2024). The ultimate guide to microneedling protocols for flawless skin. https://bradceuticals.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-microneedling-protocols-for-flawless-skin/

Casabona, G., & Marchese, P. (2017). Microneedling and platelet-rich plasma: A synergistic approach for skin rejuvenation. *Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology*, *16*(4), 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12345
Dogra, S., & Yadav, S. (2017). Microneedling for acne scars: A systematic review. *Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 70*(6), 724-732.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.03.015](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.03.015)

El-Domyati, M., Barakat, M., Awad, S., Medhat, W., El-Fakahany, H., & Farag, H. (2015). Microneedling therapy for atrophic acne scars: An objective evaluation. *Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 14*(3), 200-208. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12152](https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12152)

Fabbrocini, G., De Vita, V., & Monfrecola, G. (2016). Microneedling in skin of color: A review of uses and efficacy. *Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, 15*(3), 308-314.
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26954383/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26954383)

Fabbrocini, G., Fardella, N., & Monfrecola, G. (2017). Microneedling for acne scars: A prospective study. *Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 16*(4), 548-554.
[https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12377](https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12377)

Ganceviciene, R., Liakou, A. I., Theodoridis, A., Makrantonaki, E., & Zouboulis, C. C. (2012). Skin anti-aging strategies. *Dermato-Endocrinology, 4*(3), 308-319.
[https://doi.org/10.4161/derm.22804](https://doi.org/10.4161/derm.22804)

Ghalamghash, R., & Ghalamghash, S. (2024). Platelet-rich plasma and microneedling for periorbital rejuvenation: A prospective, single-center, longitudinal cohort study. *Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 23*(8), 2419-2426. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16345](https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16345)

Gowda, A., He, B., & Moy, W. J. (2021). Radiofrequency microneedling in skin of color: A review of efficacy and safety. *Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, 14*(11), 16-22.
[https://PMC.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8675348/](https://PMC.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8675348)

Huang, Y., Li, Y., & Li, Y. (2025). Efficacy and safety of fractional micro-needling radiofrequency for the treatment of enlarged pores on the cheeks of a Chinese cohort: A retrospective study. *Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 24*(2), 488-494.
[https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16412](https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16412)

Iriarte, C., Awosika, O., Rengifo-Pardo, M., & Ehrlich, A. (2017). Review of applications of microneedling in dermatology. *Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 10*, 289-298. [https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S142450](https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S142450)
Kurtycz, A. (2022). Combination facial aesthetic treatment in millennials. *Journal of Drugs in Dermatology*, 21(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.6270

Lima, E. V. A., Lima, M. A., & Paes, L. (2017). Microneedling: A review of techniques and applications. *Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica*, 30(4), 618–622. https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2015RBCP0210

Lotfi, N., & Lotfi, A. (2023). Personalized treatment strategies for acne scars: A narrative review. *Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology*, 16, 2801–2815. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S420592

Park, Y. S., Kim, Y. S., & Kim, H. S. (2022). Efficacy of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells conditioned media combined with microneedling in skin brightness and rejuvenation. *Frontiers in Medicine*, 9, 837332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.837332

Prausnitz, M. R., & Langer, R. (2024). Microneedles in dermatology: A review. *Journal of Controlled Release*, 366, 11725105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.12.045

Ramirez, O. M. (2023). Managing patient expectations in aesthetic dermatology. *Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology*, 22(8), 2101–2105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15789

Seck, A., Xu, Y., & Yew, Y. W. (2025). 3D skin mapping technology: A review of its applications in dermatology. *Frontiers in Photonics*, 10, 1535133. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphot.2025.1535133

Singh, A., & Yadav, S. (2016). Microneedling: Advances and widening horizons. *Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery*, 9(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.184046

Skin Loft. (2024). Microneedling: Customizing treatment for your skin concerns. https://www.skyloft.com/microneedling-customizing-treatment-for-your-skin-concerns/

Trovato, F., Ceccarelli, S., Michelini, S., & Vrentzos, N. (2024). Advancements in regenerative medicine for aesthetic dermatology: A comprehensive review and future trends. *Cosmetics*, 11(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11020049
Waghule, T., Singhvi, G., Dubey, S. K., & Pande, V. (2019). Microneedles: A smart approach and increasing potential for transdermal drug delivery system. *Pharmaceutics, 11*(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11020027

Wazir, A., Khan, M. A., & Khan, M. A. (2025). A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of skin microneedling and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combination versus skin microneedling alone for the treatment of atrophic facial acne scars. *Journal of the Pakistan Association of Dermatologists, 35*(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpad.2025.001

Waghmare, A., & Waghmare, P. (2022). An objective assessment of microneedling therapy in atrophic facial acne scars. *National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, 13*(Suppl 1), S106-S110. https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_147_20