# Effects of Wheat Bran Applied to Maternal Diet on the Intestinal Architecture and Immune Gene Expression in Suckling Piglets

Julie Leblois, Yuping Zhang, José Wavreille, Julie Uerlings, Martine Schroyen, Ester Arévalo Sureda, Hélène Soyeurt, Frédéric Dehareng, Clément Grelet, Isabelle P. Oswald, et al.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Julie Leblois, Yuping Zhang, José Wavreille, Julie Uerlings, Martine Schroyen, et al. Effects of Wheat Bran Applied to Maternal Diet on the Intestinal Architecture and Immune Gene Expression in Suckling Piglets. Animals, 2020, 10 (11), 10.3390/ani10112051. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112051](https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112051)

HAL Id: hal-03013827

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03013827

Submitted on 19 Nov 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

# Effects of Wheat Bran Applied to Maternal Diet on the Intestinal Architecture and Immune Gene Expression in Suckling Piglets

Julie Leblois <fnref n="1" />,† ID, Yuping Zhang <fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="3" />,†, José Wavreille <fnref n="2" />, Julie Uerlings <fnref n="2" />, Martine Schroyen <fnref n="2" />, Ester Arévalo Sureda ²ID, Hélène Soyeurt <fnref n="4" />, Frédéric Dehareng ⁵ID, Clément Grelet ⁵ID, Isabelle P. Oswald ⁶ID, Bing Li <fnref n="7" />, Jérôme Bindelle <fnref n="2" />, Hongfu Zhang <fnref n="3" /> and Nadia Everaert <fnref n="2" />,*

Received: 5 October 2020; Accepted: 3 November 2020; Published: 6 November 2020

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Simple Summary:** This research was committed to revealing the potential effects of the use of a high percentage of wheat bran (WB) in the sow's diets on the offspring's growth and health, by measuring the bodyweight gain, the morphology of the intestine, as well as the expression levels of immune-related genes in the mucosa of the ileum and colon. Results indicate that adding 25% of wheat bran to the sow's gestation and 14% to the lactation diet can affect the intestinal architecture and the expression of some inflammation genes, to some extent, in the ileal mucosa in the progeny.

**Abstract:** The strategy of improving the growth and health of piglets through maternal fiber diet intervention has attracted increasing attention. Therefore, 15 sows were conducted to a wheat bran (WB) group, in which the sows' diets included 25% of WB in gestation and 14% in lactation, and a control (CON) group, in which the sows' diets at all stages of reproduction did not contain WB. The results show that maternal high WB intervention seems not to have an impact on the growth of the offspring or the villus height of the duodenum, and the ratio of villi/crypts in the duodenum and jejunum were all higher in piglets born from WB sows, which may indicate that WB piglets had a larger absorption area and capacity for nutrients. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and interleukin 6 (IL6) expression levels were notably upregulated in the ileal mucosa of WB piglets, while no immune-related genes in the colonic mucosa were affected by the maternal WB supplementation. In conclusion, adding a high proportion of wheat bran to the sow's gestation and lactation diet can affect the intestinal architecture and the expression of some inflammation genes, to some extent, in the ileal mucosa in the progeny.

<footnote n="1">¹ Association Wallonne de l'Élevage Asbl (AWÉ), 5590 Ciney, Belgium; jleblois@awenet.be</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Precision Livestock and Nutrition Laboratory, TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium; yuping.zhang@doct.uliege.be (Y.Z.); J.wavreille@cra.wallonie.be (J.W.); julie.uerlings@gmail.com (J.U.); martine.schroyen@uliege.be (M.S.); Ester.ArevaloSureda@uliege.be (E.A.S.); jerome.bindelle@uliege.be (J.B.)</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; zhanghf6565@vip.sina.com</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Laboratory of Statistics, Informatics and Modelling Applied to Bioengineering, TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium; hsoyeurt@uliege.be</footnote>

<footnote n="5">5 Valorisation of Agricultural Products Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium; f.dehareng@cra.wallonie.be (F.D.); c.grelet@cra.wallonie.be (C.G.)</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶ Toxalim Research Centre in Food Toxicology, University of Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, 31027 Toulouse, France; isabelle.oswald@inra.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="7">7 New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266000, China; libing9@newhope.cn</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: nadia.everaert@uliege.be; Tel.: +32-(0)494368453</footnote>

<footnote>† These authors contributed equally.</footnote>
**Keywords:** fiber; intestinal health; maternal transfer; piglets; weaning

# 1. Introduction

Wheat bran (WB), a major byproduct of the wheat milling process, rich in dietary fiber (DF), especially non-starch polysaccharides (NSPs), has been abundantly used in livestock and poultry feeds. Although DF used to be recognized as an anti-nutritional factor due to its negative effect on the utilization of nutrients [1,2], it is currently receiving more attention thanks to its beneficial effects on the gut health of monogastric animals as it is fermented in the hindgut [3,4]. Studies show that the use of WB in chickens or pigs could improve animals' growth and health through improving intestinal morphology [5], changing the gut microbiota composition [6–8] and the profile of short chain fatty acids (SCFA), especially for butyrate [9–11]. Changes in the SCFA profile and microbiota due to fiber ingestion are assumed to be responsible for the improvement of the intestinal barrier and immune system [7,8,12].

In addition to the use of WB in the diet of weaned piglets, another strategy is the addition of WB to the maternal diet, to attempt to positively affect the intestinal health of the progeny [13,14]. Our previous study showed that a high maternal WB diet could not only change the sows' gut microbiota, but also changed a few genera of their offspring's colonic microbiota at the moment of weaning [15]. Gut bacteria have been shown to modulate the maturation of the immune system in the early life of piglets [16]. Furthermore, it is possible that changes in the gut microbes of sows and piglets may affect the immune response of piglets [13,17]. In addition to the effect of the microbiota, milk components also exert a maturation effect on the gut and have been shown to be affected by the sow's diet [18]. High levels of WB in the diet of sows increased interleukin 10 (IL10) levels in the colostrum, and affected the piglet's barrier function genes, shown by an upregulation of IL10 and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and a downregulation of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) [19].

In this study, we investigated the bodyweight, the villi height and crypt depth of the small intestine, and the expression of gut barrier and inflammatory response related genes in the ileal and colonic mucosa of piglets at weaning (four weeks of age) by high-throughput qPCR, in order to reveal the effects of high amounts of WB in a sow's diet on offspring's growth and health.

# 2. Materials and Methods

## 2.1. Ethical Approval

The animal experiment was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Liège (protocol number 1661).

## 2.2. Animals and Experimental Design

Fifteen sows were divided into two groups, in which 7 sows (3 primiparous sows and 4 multiparous) were in the wheat bran (WB) group, and 8 of them (4 primiparous and 4 multiparous) were in the control (CON) group. From the 43rd day of gestation until weaning, the WB sows were fed with a WB enriched diet, which contained 25% of WB in gestation and 14% of WB in lactation. Sows in the CON group were fed a diet devoid of WB during the same period. Both the diets were formulated to be iso-energetic and iso-nitrogenous and to meet the nutritional requirements of the sows according to the National Research Council (NRC) recommendations (Supplementary Table S1). The piglets in each group were weighed weekly and weaned after 4 weeks of suckling. For a detailed description of the housing system and the feed, we refer to Leblois et al. [15].

Fifteen ml of colostrum was collected manually from functional tits within the first 3 h after the onset of farrowing, and 15 mL of milk was sampled weekly after intramuscular injection of 1.5 mL of oxytocin 10 Un/mL (V.M.D., Arendonk, Belgium). The concentration of fat, protein and lactose was
determined in the colostrum and milk samples by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy on a Standard Lactoscope FT-MIR automatic (Delta Instruments, Drachten, The Netherlands)—the same methods and equipment are used as described by Leblois et al. [20]. Capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were used to quantify the total concentrations of immunoglobulin (Immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgM, and IgGin colostrum and milk (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, AL, USA and R&D Systems, Oxon, UK), following the manufacturer's recommendations (Leblois et al., 2018).

At 4 weeks of age, 16 female piglets with a similar bodyweight (BW) as the mean litter weight (CON: 7.6 ± 0.2 kg vs. WB: 7.8 ± 0.2 kg) were euthanized (8 piglets/treatment, 2 piglets/sow). The drug used for anesthesia was an injection of a mix of xylazine/Zoletil 100 (4 mg of xylazine, 2 mg of zolazepam and 2 mg of tilamine/kg BW) (Kela SA, Hoogstraten, Belgium; Virbac, Leuven, Belgium), followed by a T61 injection (0.1 mL/kg BW) for euthanasia (Intervet Belgium N.V., Brussel, Belgium). The ileal and colonic mucosa were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and then transferred to storage in a -80 °C freezer until further RNA extraction. Five cm of tissue samples from the duodenum, jejunum and terminal ileum were collected and dehydrated in 4% formaldehyde for 48 h followed by storage in an ethanol 70% solution. Histomorphological analyses were completed as described by Leblois et al. (2018).

## 2.3. qPCR

Total RNA of ileal and colonic mucosa was extracted as described by Uerlings [21]. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed in a BioMark HD system, using a 48.48 Dynamic Array (Fluidigm Corporation), which combines 48 samples with 48 primer sets. These included 10 housekeeping genes, 4 of them were selected for the relative quantification. These four housekeeping genes were, for ileum, the genes encoding for TATA box binding protein (TBP), peptidylprolyl isomerase A (PPLA), hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase 1 (HPRT1), β-actin (ACTB) and, for colon, TBP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH), ribosomal protein L4 (RPL4), RPL13α, PPL32 and tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein zeta (YWHAZ). Nine inflammation pathway genes were tested, including serine/threonine-protein kinase (AKT1), mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 (MAPK14), myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88), nuclear factor kappa B1 (NFκB1), nuclear factor-kappa B inhibitor alpha (NFκB1α), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 1 (NOD1), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). In addition, 13 pro-inflammatory genes, such as those encoding for chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10), defensin beta-1 (DEFβ1), defensin beta-4A (DEFβ4A), interferon beta (IFNβ), interleukin 1 beta (IL1β), IL18, IL6, IL8, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (ILRN1), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), were also determined. To test intestinal barrier integrity, 12 genes encoding for the following proteins were examined: caspase 3 (CASP3), E-cadherin (CDH1), claudin-1, claudin-3, claudin-4, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), tricellulin (MARVELD2), mucin 1 (MUC1), occludin, transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1), villin 1 (VIL1) and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1). The standard curve method was used to compare the samples, comparing all Cycle threshold (Ct) values relatively to a standard curve. The geometrical mean of the four most stable housekeeping genes was used for normalization. Primers can be found in Supplementary Table S2.

## 2.4. Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 9.2 software (Cary, NC, USA). Piglet bodyweight was analyzed with the MIXED repeated procedure of SAS, using time as repeated factor, sow as random factor and sex, and parity and maternal diet as fixed factors. Milk composition was analyzed with the repeated MIXED procedure of SAS, including time (week) as repeated effect, sow as random effect and diet and parity as fixed factor. For the high-throughput qPCR, results were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA considering the maternal treatment as fixed factor. All averages are shown in mean ± SEM. Next, *q*-values were obtained using a
false discovery rate correction with the linear method of Benjamini and Hochberg. Significance was obtained with $q < 0.05$.

## 3. Results

### 3.1. Zootechnical Results

The piglets' BW was not affected by the maternal WB diet ($p > 0.05$); however, an effect of sex was observed ($p = 0.017$), the male piglets being heavier than females at every time point (Supplementary Figure S1).

### 3.2. Milk Composition

As shown in Table 1, most of the milk components had significant changes over time, especially when comparing colostrum with regular milk. The contents of protein and immunoglobulin were observed to drop sharply after one week in both treatments, while the concentration of fat and lactose increased ($p < 0.001$). Protein and fat concentration in colostrum and milk were not influenced by maternal treatments but influenced by the parity of the sows ($p = 0.04$ and $p = 0.03$, respectively). However, the lactose percentage was not affected by the parity of the sows but globally higher in the WB group than in the CON group ($p = 0.046$), both on week two and week three. There were no effects on the measured immunoglobulins by maternal diet treatments. In addition, a parity effect was observed in sows' colostrum, the primiparous sows contained lower amounts of IgA than multiparous sows in colostrum ($11.97 \pm 0.43$ mg/mL and $15.03 \pm 1.31$ mg/mL, respectively).

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Fat, protein, lactose percentage and IgA, IgG and IgM concentrations in colostrum and milk samples collected on a weekly basis after farrowing from control (CON) or wheat bran (WB) sows. Values are presented as mean and SEM given for each period, $n = 3$ or 4 for each parity within a treatment; W1, W2 and W3 represents week 1, week 2, and week 3; P1 means the first parity of sows, and similarly the $p \ge 2$ means the parity of sows are more than 2, which are multiparous sows. * points to interaction effects between the respective parameters.</caption><thead><tr><th>Sample</th><th>Treatment</th><th>Parity</th><th>Protein (%)</th><th>Fat (%)</th><th>Lactose (%)</th><th>IgA (mg/mL)</th><th>IgG (mg/mL)</th><th>IgM (mg/mL)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="5">Colostrum</td><td>CON</td><td>1</td><td>19.49</td><td>6.48</td><td>2.6</td><td>12.63</td><td>68.58</td><td>4.99</td></tr><tr><td>CON</td><td>≥2</td><td>18.77</td><td>6.21</td><td>2.6</td><td>14.81</td><td>59.74</td><td>4.73</td></tr><tr><td>WB</td><td>1</td><td>18.36</td><td>6.63</td><td>2.66</td><td>11.48</td><td>65.69</td><td>4.23</td></tr><tr><td>WB</td><td>≥2</td><td>20.4</td><td>6.08</td><td>2.56</td><td>15.25</td><td>71.31</td><td>4.21</td></tr><tr><td>Global SEM</td><td></td><td>0.3</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.81</td><td>3.46</td><td>0.32</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Milk W1</td><td>CON</td><td>1</td><td>6.1</td><td>10.26</td><td>4.75</td><td>1.84</td><td>0.42</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>CON</td><td>≥2</td><td>6.22</td><td>9.29</td><td>4.59</td><td>2.3</td><td>0.39</td><td>1.21</td></tr><tr><td>WB</td><td>1</td><td>5.83</td><td>10.37</td><td>4.71</td><td>2.49</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.95</td></tr><tr><td>WB</td><td>≥2</td><td>6.1</td><td>8.59</td><td>4.77</td><td>2.57</td><td>0.48</td><td>1.35</td></tr><tr><td>Global SEM</td><td></td><td>0.1</td><td>0.51</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.11</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Milk W2</td><td>CON</td><td>1</td><td>5.95</td><td>10.93</td><td>4.79</td><td>2.26</td><td>0.27</td><td>1.1</td></tr><tr><td>CON</td><td>≥2</td><td>6.1</td><td>9.02</td><td>4.82</td><td>2.55</td><td>0.32</td><td>1.09</td></tr><tr><td>WB</td><td>1</td><td>5.43</td><td>9.68</td><td>4.85</td><td>2.36</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.97</td></tr><tr><td>WB</td><td>≥2</td><td>5.8</td><td>9.55</td><td>4.93</td><td>2.96</td><td>0.27</td><td>1.19</td></tr><tr><td>Global SEM</td><td></td><td>0.1</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Milk W3</td><td>CON</td><td>1</td><td>6.31</td><td>10.84</td><td>4.81</td><td>3.22</td><td>0.21</td><td>1.01</td></tr><tr><td>CON</td><td>≥2</td><td>6.15</td><td>8.88</td><td>4.84</td><td>3.56</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.95</td></tr><tr><td>WB</td><td>1</td><td>5.74</td><td>8.31</td><td>4.95</td><td>3.77</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.98</td></tr><tr><td>WB</td><td>≥2</td><td>5.98</td><td>9.4</td><td>4.91</td><td>3.37</td><td>0.16</td><td>1.03</td></tr><tr><td>Global SEM</td><td></td><td>0.08</td><td>0.38</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.08</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Overall p-values</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Treatment</td></tr><tr><td>Time</td><td></td><td>0.16</td><td>0.23</td><td>&lt;0.05</td><td>0.77</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.58</td></tr><tr><td>Parity</td><td></td><td>&lt;0.001</td><td>&lt;0.001</td><td>&lt;0.001</td><td>&lt;0.001</td><td>&lt;0.001</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Treatment*Week</td><td></td><td>0.04</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.75</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.82</td><td>0.76</td></tr><tr><td>Treatment*Parity</td><td></td><td>0.48</td><td>0.48</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.31</td></tr><tr><td>Time*Parity</td><td></td><td>&lt;0.01</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.58</td><td>0.82</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.73</td></tr><tr><td>Treatment*Time*Parity</td><td></td><td>0.4</td><td>0.63</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.19</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>0.12</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.25</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.9</td></tr></tbody></table>
### 3.3. Histomorphology Analysis of the Small Intestine

The villi height and crypt depth were used to represent the morphology of the small intestine (Figure 1). Our results show that the villi height in the duodenum of piglets was significantly higher in the WB group than that in the CON group (*p* < 0.05), which is also the reason for the increase in villi/crypt (V/C) ratio (*p* < 0.01). The crypts depth in the jejunum tended to be lower for the WB piglets than those of the CON piglets (*p* < 0.1), thereby the villi/crypt ratio was significantly higher for the WB piglets (*p* < 0.05). However, the villi height, the crypt depth and the (V/C) ratio parameters were found to be unaffected by the maternal treatments for the ileum of piglets (*p* > 0.05).

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** The villus height (a), crypt depth (b) and villi/crypt (V:C) ratio (c) of piglets born from CON (black bar) or WB (grey bars) sows, *n* = 8, values are shown as mean ± SEM, * means *p* < 0.05, ** represents *p* < 0.01 + represents *p* < 0.10, the unit of height and depth is µm.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.4. Relative Gene Expression in Ileum and Colon Mucosa

In the ileal mucosa, the expression of PPARγ, a gene in the inflammation signaling pathway, and IL6, a pro-inflammatory gene, were significantly higher when looking at the *p*-value (mean ± SEM of 1.02 ± 0.12 for WB vs. 0.61 ± 0.15 for CON, *p* = 0.049, *q* = 0.813, for PPARγ; mean ± SEM of 1.37 ± 0.12 for WB vs. 1.03 ± 0.096 for CON, *p* = 0.047; *q* = 0.813 for IL6) in the piglets born from WB sows compared to piglets born from control sows. No other gene in the ileum differed between treatments and neither did the genes determined in the colon (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4).

## 4. Discussion

The results from the present study show that WB supplementation in the diet of sows during gestation and lactation did not markedly affect the growth performance of their offspring. This result is in agreement with several previous studies [22–24], showing that the maternal high fiber diet has no or limited effects on the performance of the progeny.

The villus height to crypt depth ratio is a useful criterion for estimating the likely digestive or absorptive capacity of the small intestine [25]. Li et al. reported an increased crypt depth of the jejunum
in weaned piglets with an increased maternal insoluble fiber/soluble fiber ratio [26]. Similarly, in the present study, the villi/crypt ratio of duodenum and jejunum were significantly higher in piglets around four weeks. The question remains if the higher lactose concentration in the WB sow's milk has played a role on the intestinal architecture of the piglets, and if this phenomenon would have given the piglets an improved condition for the stressful weaning event, or whether it would have impacted the performance long term.

On the other hand, the equal amounts of protein, fat, and immunoglobulin content in the milk of the two groups did not present a more favorable situation for the piglets, as they received the same passive immunity.

In our previous study, we showed that the microbiota of the colon of these piglets was affected to a certain extent at weaning. Three genera significantly differed between treatments, and six genera tended to differ [15]. Although the exact mechanisms are not always known, shifts in gut microbiota composition and density can alter immune homeostasis and protective responses in the gut. Hence, we focused on some important genes involved in the immune response and investigated if feeding WB would influence their expression. Proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNFα, trigger inflammatory response and have negative effects on intestinal integrity and epithelial function [27,28]. In contrast, anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as PPARγ and IL10, are a series of immunoregulatory molecules that control the proinflammatory cytokine response [29–32]. It has been reported that some cytokines, such as IL6, have opposite properties related to their form being soluble or transmembrane, resulting in either pro- or anti-inflammatory working mechanisms, respectively [33,34]. The present study shows no differences in the mRNA expression of the colonic mucosa between the piglets from the two examined groups. However, IL6 and PPARγ were upregulated in the piglets' ileum of the WB group. Interestingly, the upregulation of IL6 can play an important role in mucosal protection, associated with reducing infection-induced apoptosis in the epithelium and subsequent ulcerations [35]. We speculate therefore that the function of IL6 in the piglet's ileal mucosa in this study might be anti-inflammatory and plays a key role in barrier integrity. It remains to be investigated whether piglets, being the offspring of sows receiving wheat bran during late gestation, would cope better with weaning stress

**5. Conclusions**

The maternal high WB supplementation (25% in gestation and 14% in lactation) did not impact piglets' growth from birth until weaning. Nevertheless, at four weeks of age, piglets from the WB group had a higher villi height in the duodenum, and villi/crypt ratio in duodenum and jejunum. Furthermore, the increased ileal IL6 and PPARγ mRNA levels of piglets born from WB sows warrant further investigation.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/11/2051/s1, Supplementary Table S1. Ingredients proportions and composition of gestation and lactation diets of the sows. Supplementary Table S2. Primer information for housekeeping genes tested, and for inflammation signaling pathways, pro-inflammatory and intestinal barrier integrity genes. Supplementary Table S3. The effect of wheat bran addition on the expression of inflammation signaling pathways, pro-inflammatory and intestinal barrier integrity genes in the ileal mucosa of piglets. Supplementary Table S4. The effect of wheat bran addition on the expression of inflammation signaling pathways, pro-inflammatory and intestinal barrier integrity genes in the colonic mucosa of piglets. Supplementary Figure S1. Weekly bodyweight of piglets born from WB and CON sows, from birth (week 0) until weaning (week 4).

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, N.E.; methodology, N.E. and M.S.; software, M.S. and E.A.S.; validation, M.S., H.S., I.P.O. and J.B.; formal analysis, M.S. and Y.Z.; investigation, J.L., J.U. and B.L.; resources, J.W., F.D. and C.G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L. and Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.S., N.E. and H.Z.; supervision, N.E.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research was funded by Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS, grant number 31248729, and by the Research Foundation for Industry and Agriculture, National Scientific Research Foundation (FRIA-FNRS).

**Acknowledgments:** The authors would like to thank the Research Foundation for Industry and Agriculture, National Scientific Research Foundation (FRIA-FNRS) and the University of Liège for funding this study. We thank the feed company Dumoulin for supplying feed. We also thank the COST action SALAAM (BM1308) for funding
the learning of the ex vivo technique. CRAw and the lab team are also acknowledged for their help during the animal experiment and laboratory analyses.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## References

1. Annison, G. The role of wheat non-starch polysaccharides in broiler nutrition. *Aust. J. Agric. Res.* **1993**, *44*, 405-422. [CrossRef]

2. Jha, R.; Rossnagel, B.; Pieper, R.; Van Kessel, A.; Leterme, P. Barley and oat cultivars with diverse carbohydrate composition alter ileal and total tract nutrient digestibility and fermentation metabolites in weaned piglets. *Animal* **2010**, *4*, 724–731. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Jha, R.; Leterme, P. Feed ingredients differing in fermentable fibre and indigestible protein content affect fermentation metabolites and faecal nitrogen excretion in growing pigs. *Animal* **2012**, *6*, 603–611. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Jha, R.; Berrocoso, J. Dietary fiber utilization and its effects on physiological functions and gut health of swine. *Animal* **2015**, *9*, 1441–1452. [CrossRef]

5. Saqui-Salces, M.; Huang, Z.; Vila, M.F.; Li, J.; Mielke, J.A.; Urriola, P.E.; Shurson, G.C. Modulation of intestinal cell differentiation in growing pigs is dependent on the fiber source in the diet1. *J. Anim. Sci.* **2017**, *95*, 1179–1190. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Molist, F.; de Segura, A.G.; Pérez, J.; Bhandari, S.; Krause, D.; Nyachoti, C. Effect of wheat bran on the health and performance of weaned pigs challenged with Escherichia coli K88+. *Livest. Sci.* **2010**, *133*, 214–217. [CrossRef]

7. Chen, H.; Mao, X.; He, J.; Yu, B.; Huang, Z.; Yu, J.; Zheng, P.; Chen, D. Dietary fibre affects intestinal mucosal barrier function and regulates intestinal bacteria in weaning piglets. *Br. J. Nutr.* **2013**, *110*, 1837–1848. [CrossRef]

8. Chen, H.; Chen, D.; Qin, W.; Liu, Y.; Che, L.; Huang, Z.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, D.; Liu, Y.; et al. Wheat bran components modulate intestinal bacteria and gene expression of barrier function relevant proteins in a piglet model. *Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr.* **2017**, *68*, 65–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9. Van Craeyveld, V.; Swennen, K.; Dornez, E.; Van de Wiele, T.; Marzorati, M.; Verstraete, W.; Delaedt, Y.; Onagbesan, O.; Decuypere, E.; Buyse, J.; et al. Structurally different wheat-derived arabinoxylanooligosaccharides have different prebiotic and fermentation properties in rats. *Livest. Sci.* **2008**, *138*, 2348–2355. [CrossRef]

10. Koo, B.; Hossain, M.M.; Nyachoti, C.M. Effect of dietarywheat bran inclusion on nutrient and energy digestibility and microbial metabolites in weaned pigs. *Livest. Sci.* **2017**, *203*, 110–113. [CrossRef]

11. Zhao, J.; Liu, P.; Wu, Y.; Guo, P.; Liu, L.; Ma, N.; Levesque, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J. Dietary Fiber Increases Butyrate-Producing Bacteria and Improves the Growth Performance of Weaned Piglets. *J. Agric. Food. Chem.* **2018**, *66*, 7995–8004. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. Neyrinck, A.M.; Van Hée, V.F.; Piront, N.; De Backer, F.; Toussaint, O.; Cani, P.D.; Delzenne, N.M. Wheat-derived arabinoxylan oligosaccharides with prebiotic effect increase satietogenic gut peptides and reduce metabolic endotoxemia in diet-induced obese mice. *Nutr. Diabetes* **2012**, *2*, e28. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Jarrett, S.; Ashworth, C.J. The role of dietary fibre in pig production, with a particular emphasis on reproduction. *J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.* **2018**, *9*, 59. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14. Jiang, L.; Feng, C.; Tao, S.; Li, N.; Zuo, B.; Han, D.; Wang, J. Maternal imprinting of the neonatal microbiota colonization in intrauterine growth restricted piglets: A review. *J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.* **2019**, *10*, 88. [CrossRef]

15. Leblois, J.; Massart, S.; Li, B.; Wavreille, J.; Bindelle, J.; Everaert, N. Modulation of piglets' microbiota: Differential effects by a high wheat bran maternal diet during gestation and lactation. *Sci. Rep.* **2017**, *7*, 7426. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16. Schokker, D.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.L.; Vastenhouw, S.A.; Heilig, H.G.H.J.; Smidt, H.; Rebel, J.M.J.; Smits, M.A. Early-life environmental variation affects intestinal microbiota and immune development in new-born piglets. *PLoS ONE* **2014**, *9*, e100040. [CrossRef]

17. Everaert, N.; Van Cruchten, S.; Weström, B.; Bailey, M.; Van Ginneken, C.; Thymann, T.; Pieper, R. A review on early gut maturation and colonization in pigs, including biological and dietary factors affecting gut homeostasis. *Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.* **2017**, *233*, 89–103. [CrossRef]
18. Leonard, S.; Sweeney, T.; Bahar, B.; O'Doherty, J. Effect of maternal seaweed extract supplementation on suckling piglet growth, humoral immunity, selected microflora, and immune response after an ex vivo lipopolysaccharide challenge. *J. Anim. Sci.* **2011**, *90*, 505–514. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19. Shang, Q.; Liu, H.; Liu, S.; He, T.; Piao, X. Effects of dietary fiber sources during late gestation and lactation on sow performance, milk quality, and intestinal health in piglets1. *J. Anim. Sci.* **2019**, *97*, 4922–4933. [CrossRef]

20. Leblois, J.; Massart, S.; Soyeurt, H.; Grelet, C.; Dehareng, F.; Schroyen, M.; Li, B.; Wavreille, J.; Bindelle, J.; Everaert, N. Feeding sows resistant starch during gestation and lactation impacts their faecal microbiota and milk composition but shows limited effects on their progeny. *PLoS ONE* **2018**, *13*, e0199568. [CrossRef]

21. Uerlings, J.; Schroyen, M.; Bautil, A.; Courtin, C.; Richel, A.; Sureda, E.A.; Bruggeman, G.; Tanghe, S.; Willems, E.; Bindelle, J. In vitro prebiotic potential of agricultural by-products on intestinal fermentation, gut barrier and inflammatory status of piglets. *Br. J. Nutr.* **2020**, *123*, 293–307. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. Loisel, F.; Farmer, C.; Ramaekers, P.; Quesnel, H. Effects of high fiber intake during late pregnancy on sow physiology, colostrum production, and piglet performance1. *J. Anim. Sci.* **2013**, *91*, 5269–5279. [CrossRef]

23. Guillemet, R.; Hamard, A.; Quesnel, H.; Père, M.C.; Etienne, M.; Dourmad, J.Y.; Meunier-Salaün, M.C. Dietary fibre for gestating sows: Effects on parturition progress, behaviour, litter and sow performance. *Animal* **2007**, *1*, 872–880. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Holt, J.P.; Johnston, L.J.; Baidoo, S.K.; Shurson, G.C. Effects of a high-fiber diet and frequent feeding on behavior, reproductive performance, and nutrient digestibility in gestating sows. *J. Anim. Sci.* **2006**, *84*, 946–955. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25. Hedemann, M.S.; Eskildsen, M.; Lærke, H.N.; Pedersen, C.; Lindberg, J.E.; Laurinen, P.; Bach Knudsen, K.E. Intestinal morphology and enzymatic activity in newly weaned pigs fed contrasting fiber concentrations and fiber properties. *J. Anim. Sci.* **2006**, *84*, 1375–1386. [CrossRef]

26. Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, H.; Yang, Y.; He, J.; Cao, M.; Yang, M.; Zhong, W.; Lin, Y.; Zhuo, Y.; et al. Effects of the Ratio of Insoluble Fiber to Soluble Fiber in Gestation Diets on Sow Performance and Offspring Intestinal Development. *Animals* **2019**, *9*, 422. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27. Belkaid, Y.; Naik, S. Compartmentalized and systemic control of tissue immunity by commensals. *Nat. Immunol.* **2013**, *14*, 646–653. [CrossRef]

28. Xu, H.; Hu, M.B.; Bai, P.D.; Zhu, W.H.; Liu, S.H.; Hou, J.Y.; Xiong, Z.Q.; Ding, Q.; Jiang, H.W. Pro-inflammatory cytokines in prostate cancer development and progression promoted by high-fat diet. *BioMed. Res. Int.* **2015**, *249741*. [CrossRef]

29. Al-Sadi, R.; Boivin, M.; Ma, T. Mechanism of cytokine modulation of epithelial tight junction barrier. *Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.)* **2009**, *14*, 2765–2778. [CrossRef]

30. Onipe, O.O.; Jideani, A.I.O.; Beswa, D. Composition and functionality of wheat bran and its application in some cereal food products. *Int. J. Food Sci. Tech.* **2015**, *50*, 2509–2518. [CrossRef]

31. Jiang, C.; Ting, A.T.; Seed, B. PPAR-γ agonists inhibit production of monocyte inflammatory cytokines. *Nature* **1998**, *391*, 82–86. [CrossRef]

32. Opal, S.M.; DePalo, V.A.J.C. Anti-inflammatory cytokines. *Chest* **2000**, *117*, 1162–1172. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

33. Scheller, J.; Chalaris, A.; Schmidt-Arras, D.; Rose-John, S. The pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of the cytokine interleukin-6. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta.* **2011**, *1813*, 878–888. [CrossRef]

34. Xue, X.; Falcon, D.M. The Role of Immune Cells and Cytokines in Intestinal Wound Healing. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.* **2019**, *20*, 6097. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

35. Dann, S.M.; Spehlmann, M.E.; Hammond, D.C.; Iimura, M.; Hase, K.; Choi, L.J.; Hanson, E.; Eckmann, L. IL-6-dependent mucosal protection prevents establishment of a microbial niche for attaching/effacing lesion-forming enteric bacterial pathogens. *J. Immunol.* **2008**, *180*, 6816–6826. [CrossRef]

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).