# Impact of long-lasting moderate-intensity stage cycling event on cardiac function in young female athletes: A case study

Solène Le Douairon Lahaye, Gaëlle Kervio, Vincent Menard, Anna Barrero, Thibault Lachard, Guy Carrault, David Matelot, François Carré, Frédéric Schnell

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## ► To cite this version:

Solène Le Douairon Lahaye, Gaëlle Kervio, Vincent Menard, Anna Barrero, Thibault Lachard, et al.. Impact of long-lasting moderate-intensity stage cycling event on cardiac function in young female athletes: A case study. PLoS ONE, 2022, 17 (10), pp.e0275332. 10.1371/journal.pone.0275332. hal-03828635

HAL Id: hal-03828635

https://hal.science/hal-03828635

Submitted on 25 Oct 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
RESEARCH ARTICLE

# Impact of long-lasting moderate-intensity stage cycling event on cardiac function in young female athletes: A case study

Solène Le Douairon Lahaye<sup>1*</sup>, Gaëlle Kervio<sup>2</sup>, Vincent Menard<sup>1</sup>, Anna Barrero<sup>1</sup>, Thibault Lachard<sup>3</sup>, Guy Carrault<sup>2,4</sup>, David Matelot<sup>4</sup>, François Carré<sup>3,4</sup>, Frédéric Schnell<sup>2,3,4</sup>

1 M2S Laboratory, ENS Rennes, University of Rennes 2, Rennes, France, 2 CIC-CIT INSERM 1414, Rennes, France, 3 Department of Sports Medicine, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France, 4 INSERM, LTSI-UMR1099, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France

* solene.ledouairon@univ-rennes2.fr

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

## Abstract

### Purpose

Effects of intense and/or prolonged exercise have been studied extensively in male athletes. Nevertheless, data are scarce on the effect of long duration events on cardiac function in female athletes. Our aim was to investigate the effect of a long-lasting moderate-intensity stage cycling event on cardiac function of young female athletes.

### Methods

Seven well-trained female cyclists were included. They completed a cycling event of 3529 km on 23 days. All underwent an echocardiography on 6 time-points (baseline and at the arrival of day (D) 3, 7, 12, 13 and 23). Cardiac function was assessed by conventional echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging and speckle tracking techniques. Daily exercise load was determined by heart rate (HR), power output and rate of perceived exertion data (RPE, Borg scale).

### Results

All stages were mainly done at moderate intensity (average HR: 65% of maximal, average aerobic power output: 36% of maximal, average RPE: 4). Resting HR measured at the time of echocardiography did not vary during the event. Resting cardiac dimensions did not significantly change during the 23 days of cycling. No significant modification of cardiac function, whatever the studied cavity, were observed all along the event.

### Conclusion

The results suggest that, in the context of our case study, the long-lasting moderate-intensity stage cycling event was not associated with cardiac function alteration. Nevertheless, we must be careful in interpreting them due to the limits of an underpowered study.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

OPEN ACCESS

**Citation:** Le Douairon Lahaye S, Kervio G, Menard V, Barrero A, Lachard T, Carrault G, et al. (2022) Impact of long-lasting moderate-intensity stage cycling event on cardiac function in young female athletes: A case study. PLoS ONE 17(10): e0275332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275332

**Editor:** Laurent Mourot, University of Bourgogne France Comté, FRANCE

**Received:** November 22, 2021

**Accepted:** September 14, 2022

**Published:** October 4, 2022

**Copyright:** © 2022 Le Douairon Lahaye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the [Creative Commons Attribution License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Data Availability Statement:** All relevant data are within the paper.

**Funding:** The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

**Competing interests:** The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
**Introduction**

Acute prolonged intense exercise provides a substantial challenge to the cardiovascular system and can induce an exercise-induced cardiac fatigue (EICF) [1–5]. EICF could be evaluated with cardiac biomarkers or imaging methods, especially echocardiography. Numerous studies, conducted mainly in male athletes, observe an alteration in cardiac biomarkers and/or systolic and diastolic functional indicators after acute prolonged intense exercise [6–12]. Echocardiographically, the EICF seems to adopt a cascade: from alteration of speckle tracking derived parameters of diastolic function to an alteration of the conventional markers of systolic function [13]. Nevertheless, in the great majority of cases, this EICF was transient. Indeed, cardiac function and biomarkers returned to normal after 24–48 hours of recovery [6, 7, 14, 15].

However, in the case of multi-day prolonged exercise, athletes usually benefit from short (< 24 hours) recovery periods between stages. Thus, it makes sense to think that the physiological stress placed on the myocardium during repeated and prolonged efforts may result in a cumulative decrement in cardiac function, subsequently delaying the recovery process. Surprisingly, this cumulative cardiac fatigue was not found in most of studies that investigated the impact of multi-day prolonged exercise on cardiac function [16–18].

These studies included essentially male or mixed population athletes. However, females are increasingly participating in these multi-day extended events with some of them exclusively reserved for them (e.g Raid amazones, Laponie Trophy, Corsica Raid Femina...). Due to different motivations from those of male athletes, the vast majority of them perform these sport events at a moderate intensity, looking for happiness, social needs and physical fitness rather than performance [19, 20].

To our knowledge, the cardiovascular response of female to this kind of physical exercise is less documented [21, 22]. In a previous study on well-trained female cyclists, we have demonstrated that during a multistage event, heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters evolved along the event in correlation with the daily physical activity [22]. Nevertheless, the effect of this type of events on specific cardiac function parameters in female athletes remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of the present case study was to study the impact of a long-lasting moderate-intensity stage cycling event on cardiac function of well-trained young female cyclists using conventional and two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiographic markers.

**Methods**

The experimental design of the case study is presented in Fig 1.

**Population**

As in our previous study [22], we included all the members of the sport project “Donnons des elles au vélo J-1” (2016 edition) i.e seven healthy and well-trained (regional or national level) female cyclists coming from 3 countries (Belgium, France, Ukraine). This project sport aims to promote women’s cycling. All subjects were non-smokers, healthy with no history of cardiac disease and without medication. Due to the ecological context of the research project (integrated to sport project), the menstrual cycle for each subject was different at the beginning of the event and thus not controlled. Cyclists reported not taking the pill for at least 6 months. All participants gave their informed consent to participate in this study, which received the approval of the Rennes university hospital ethics committee (Number 2013-A01524-41) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Fig 1. Experimental design.</figcaption></figure>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275332.g001

## Pre- and post-participation medical evaluation

All athletes had a medical examination before and 48h after the end of the cycling event. It included a physical exam, a resting electrocardiogram (ECG), and an incremental maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on an electronically braked cycle ergometer. We used the French Cycling Federation incremental protocol with warm-up stage (100W/5min and 150W/1min) followed by a regular step load-increase (25W/min) until exhaustion.

## Cycling event description

Cyclists performed a long-lasting moderate-intensity stage cycling event that consisted of 21 stages and two rest days (Table 1).

The event was carried out without spirit of competition, the goal was only to complete the 3529 km of the event to promote women cycling. Athletes traveled all the flat stages together but performed the mountain stages at her own pace. Due to the length of the stages, cyclists fed and hydrated continuously on the bike, according their needs. The individual fluid intake was also free during the recovery period between each stage.

## Echocardiography

All subjects underwent resting echocardiography using a Vivid Q (GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Horten, Norway) the day before the start of the race, on 5 time points chosen according to the characteristics of the stage (flat and mountainous) and when logistics allowed (Table 1). They were all performed post-stage, as close to exercise cessation as possible (between 30 and 180 min) on arrival at the hotel located at sea level. All data were stored on a workstation for offline analysis (EchoPAC BT12; GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS) by a single cardiologist blinded to the clinical data. For each measurement, at least two cardiac cycles were averaged. Left
<table><caption>Table 1. Characteristics of the multi-stage event.</caption><thead><tr><th>Day</th><th>Stage</th><th>Distance (km)</th><th>Profile</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>D1</td><td>1<sup>st</sup></td><td>188</td><td>Flat stage</td></tr><tr><td>D2</td><td>2<sup>nd</sup></td><td>183</td><td>Flat stage</td></tr><tr><td>D3</td><td>3<sup>rd</sup></td><td>223.5</td><td>Flat stage</td></tr><tr><td>D4</td><td>4<sup>th</sup></td><td>237.5</td><td>Flat stage</td></tr><tr><td>D5</td><td>5<sup>th</sup></td><td>216</td><td>Medium mountain stage</td></tr><tr><td>D6</td><td>6<sup>th</sup></td><td>190.5</td><td>Flat stage</td></tr><tr><td>D7</td><td>7<sup>th</sup></td><td>162</td><td>Medium mountain stage</td></tr><tr><td>D8</td><td>8<sup>th</sup></td><td>184</td><td>High mountain stage</td></tr><tr><td>D9</td><td>9<sup>th</sup></td><td>184.5</td><td>High mountain stage</td></tr><tr><td>D10</td><td>Rest</td><td></td><td>Rest Day</td></tr><tr><td>D11</td><td>10<sup>th</sup></td><td>197</td><td>Flat stage</td></tr><tr><td>D12</td><td>11<sup>th</sup></td><td>162.5</td><td>Flat stage</td></tr><tr><td>D13</td><td>12<sup>th</sup></td><td>178</td><td>High mountain stage</td></tr><tr><td>D14</td><td>13<sup>th</sup></td><td>37.5</td><td>Hilly stage</td></tr><tr><td>D15</td><td>14<sup>th</sup></td><td>208.5</td><td>Flat stage</td></tr><tr><td>D16</td><td>15<sup>th</sup></td><td>160</td><td>High mountain stage</td></tr><tr><td>D17</td><td>16<sup>th</sup></td><td>209</td><td>Flat stage</td></tr><tr><td>D18</td><td>Rest</td><td></td><td>Rest Day</td></tr><tr><td>D19</td><td>17<sup>th</sup></td><td>184.5</td><td>High mountain stage</td></tr><tr><td>D20</td><td>18<sup>th</sup></td><td>17</td><td>Short high mountain stage</td></tr><tr><td>D21</td><td>19<sup>th</sup></td><td>146</td><td>High mountain stage</td></tr><tr><td>D22</td><td>20<sup>th</sup></td><td>146.5</td><td>High mountain stage</td></tr><tr><td>D23</td><td>21<sup>th</sup></td><td>113</td><td>Flat stage</td></tr></tbody></table>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275332.t001

ventricle end-diastolic (LVED) and end-systolic (LVES) diameters and LVED wall thickness were measured in parasternal views [23]. LV volumes and ejection fraction were measured by the biplane methods; peak E- wave and A-wave velocities of the mitral inflow were measured using pulsed-wave Doppler. Tissue Doppler imaging was recorded at the level of septal and lateral mitral annulus, to obtain the average peak velocities during systole (s') and early (e') and late (a') diastole. The E/e' ratio was calculated to assess LV filling pressure. Right ventricular (RV) morphological parameters were assessed using RV end-diastolic basal (RVD1) and mid cavity diameter (RVD2), RVED and RVES areas [23].

Longitudinal myocardial deformations, based on the speckle-tracking approach, were evaluated from standard two-dimensional images (at frame rates of ≥60 sec⁻¹). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was the average of the 18 segmental strain values from the apical four-, three-, and two-chamber views [24]. Post-systolic shortening was not included in the global strain analysis. The time to maximal myocardial shortening, including post-systolic shortening if present, was measured from the electrocardiographic onset Q wave in the 18 LV segments. RV global longitudinal strain (RV GLS) was determined as the average of the 3 RV free wall segments, from an apical four-chamber image focused on the RV as recommended [25].

Left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) longitudinal strain was assessed on the six segments of apical four-chamber view as recommended [25]. The ECG-derived R-wave was taken as the first reference frame. Peak and pre-atrial contraction values of LA longitudinal strain [L-e-Max (reservoir function) and L-e-PA (pump function), respectively] were calculated by averaging the values observed in the LA segments. Difference between peak and pre-atrial
contraction values of LA longitudinal strain was calculated [Le-p = L-e-Max—L-e-PA; (con- duit function)]. The same analysis was done with the RA strain.

## Exercise load analysis

HR and GPS data were monitored continuously during each stage with a HR monitor (Polar V800, Kempele, Finland). Power data were collected using powermeter pedals (Powertap P1). We used mean HR (% of maximal HR) and mean normalized power output, (% of maximal aerobic power output) to calculate individual objective exercise daily load. The Borg CR 10 scale was used to determine the individual rate of perceived exertion (RPE), indicative of sub- jective load [26].

## Statistical analysis

A Shapiro-Wilk test was used to confirm the normal Gaussian distribution of the data. Quanti- tative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). An analysis of variance for repeated measurements was used to analyze the evolution of the different echocardiographic parameter over time was used. A Bonferoni correction was applied. Significance was set at *p*<0.05. Statisticall analysis was perform using Statistica v.7.1.

## Results

### General and exercise related-data

Athletes' mean age was 29.4 ± 2.7 years (Table 2).

They had an average 10.0 ± 6.6 years' experience in cycling, and reported an average weekly training of 250 km. Table 2 shows their anthropometrical and physiological characteristics and the results of the baseline CPET. Baseline maximum oxygen uptake and maximal aerobic power output were 53.5±11.0 mL.min.kg⁻¹ and 287.9 ± 20.0 W, respectively.

All participants successfully completed the whole circuit (3529 km with 21 stages and 2 days of rest) within approximately 9236 minutes (154 hours), with a mean stage duration of 440 minutes (7 hours and 20 minutes).

The average percentage of maximal HR sustained during each stage was between 58 and 71%, with a mean of 65%. The average percentage of maximal aerobic power output was

<table><caption>Table 2. Individual characteristics of the subjects participating in the case study.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Age<br>(years)</th><th>Weight<br>(kg)</th><th>Height<br>(cm)</th><th>BMI<br>(kg.m<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>Previous cycling<br>experience<br>(years)</th><th>Training<br>(km.week<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>V̇O<sub>2</sub> max<br>(ml.min.kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>Maximal Aerobic<br>Power Output<br>(watts)</th><th>Relative Maximal Aerobic<br>Power Output<br>(W.kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Subject 1</td><td>27</td><td>57.2</td><td>164</td><td>21.20</td><td>5</td><td>250</td><td>57.6</td><td>320</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>Subject 2</td><td>26</td><td>64.8</td><td>170</td><td>22.10</td><td>3</td><td>200</td><td>48.4</td><td>260</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>Subject 3</td><td>30</td><td>50.4</td><td>146</td><td>24.40</td><td>16</td><td>350</td><td>55.5</td><td>280</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>Subject 4</td><td>30</td><td>52.3</td><td>159</td><td>20.60</td><td>6</td><td>300</td><td>50.4</td><td>300</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>Subject 5</td><td>34</td><td>61.5</td><td>167</td><td>21.50</td><td>18</td><td>100</td><td>45.3</td><td>275</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>Subject 6</td><td>28</td><td>78.2</td><td>170</td><td>24.90</td><td>5</td><td>250</td><td>42.0</td><td>300</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>Subject 7</td><td>31</td><td>53.2</td><td>165</td><td>18.70</td><td>17</td><td>300</td><td>75.1</td><td>280</td><td>5.3</td></tr><tr><td>Mean ± SD</td><td>29.4 ± 2.7</td><td>59.6 ± 9.7</td><td>163.0 ± 8.4</td><td>21.9 ± 2.1</td><td>10.0 ± 6.6</td><td>250.0 ± 81.6</td><td>53.5 ± 11.0</td><td>287.9 ± 20.0</td><td>4.9 ± 0.8</td></tr></tbody></table>

V̇O₂ max: maximum oxygen uptake.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275332.t002
<table><caption>Table 3. Stage-associated exercise load.</caption><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Duration<br>(min)</th><th>Mean normalized power output<br>(Watt)</th><th>% Wmax</th><th>Mean HR<br>(bpm)</th><th>% HRmax</th><th>Maximum HR<br>(bpm)</th><th>RPE<br>(n.u)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1<sup>st</sup></td><td>397</td><td>119 ± 10</td><td>40 ± 5</td><td>128 ± 8</td><td>68 ± 5</td><td>172 ± 4</td><td>4 ± 2</td></tr><tr><td>2<sup>nd</sup></td><td>472</td><td>121 ± 9</td><td>41 ± 5</td><td>124 ± 3</td><td>63 ± 5</td><td>181 ± 4</td><td>4 ± 2</td></tr><tr><td>3<sup>rd</sup></td><td>554</td><td>120 ± 10</td><td>41 ± 3</td><td>118 ± 5</td><td>60 ± 4</td><td>164 ± 6</td><td>6 ± 2</td></tr><tr><td>4<sup>th</sup></td><td>532</td><td>122 ± 12</td><td>42 ± 5</td><td>122 ± 7</td><td>65 ± 5</td><td>162 ± 3</td><td>5 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>5<sup>th</sup></td><td>569</td><td>134 ± 9</td><td>45 ± 4</td><td>126 ± 6</td><td>67 ± 4</td><td>174 ± 10</td><td>7 ± 2</td></tr><tr><td>6<sup>th</sup></td><td>456</td><td>119 ± 7</td><td>41 ± 3</td><td>122 ± 9</td><td>65 ± 6</td><td>168 ± 5</td><td>4 ± 2</td></tr><tr><td>7<sup>th</sup></td><td>421</td><td>134 ± 12</td><td>46 ± 6</td><td>129 ± 5</td><td>69 ± 3</td><td>165 ± 9</td><td>4 ± 2</td></tr><tr><td>8<sup>th</sup></td><td>561</td><td>137 ± 9</td><td>48 ± 6</td><td>130 ± 7</td><td>69 ± 4</td><td>163 ± 8</td><td>5 ± 2</td></tr><tr><td>9<sup>th</sup></td><td>586</td><td>131 ± 8</td><td>44 ± 4</td><td>127 ± 7</td><td>68 ± 3</td><td>181 ± 31</td><td>7 ± 2</td></tr><tr><td>Rest</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>10<sup>th</sup></td><td>470</td><td>131 ± 12</td><td>44 ± 4</td><td>123 ± 3</td><td>66 ± 2</td><td>181 ± 31</td><td>5 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>11<sup>th</sup></td><td>386</td><td>127 ± 15</td><td>44 ± 6</td><td>114 ± 7</td><td>61 ± 4</td><td>181 ± 32</td><td>2 ± 1</td></tr><tr><td>12<sup>th</sup></td><td>478</td><td>135 ± 12</td><td>47 ± 5</td><td>117 ± 5</td><td>64 ± 5</td><td>179 ± 39</td><td>4 ± 1</td></tr><tr><td>13<sup>th</sup></td><td>105</td><td>150 ± 15</td><td>52 ± 6</td><td>123 ± 6</td><td>66 ± 4</td><td>184 ± 37</td><td>2 ± 1</td></tr><tr><td>14<sup>th</sup></td><td>505</td><td>134 ± 15</td><td>46 ± 6</td><td>117 ± 5</td><td>62 ± 4</td><td>166 ± 8</td><td>4 ± 2</td></tr><tr><td>15<sup>th</sup></td><td>485</td><td>149 ± 10</td><td>52 ± 5</td><td>129 ± 6</td><td>69 ± 3</td><td>173 ± 20</td><td>5 ± 1</td></tr><tr><td>16<sup>th</sup></td><td>529</td><td>114 ± 14</td><td>39 ± 5</td><td>109 ± 6</td><td>59 ± 4</td><td>153 ± 11</td><td>4 ± 1</td></tr><tr><td>Rest</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>17<sup>th</sup></td><td>491</td><td>142 ± 11</td><td>49 ± 5</td><td>130 ± 7</td><td>69 ± 3</td><td>176 ± 26</td><td>5 ± 2</td></tr><tr><td>18<sup>th</sup></td><td>84</td><td>144 ± 8</td><td>48 ± 5</td><td>133 ± 8</td><td>71 ± 4</td><td>175 ± 20</td><td>2 ± 0</td></tr><tr><td>19<sup>th</sup></td><td>517</td><td>143 ± 9</td><td>49 ± 5</td><td>127 ± 6</td><td>68 ± 2</td><td>165 ± 9</td><td>5 ± 1</td></tr><tr><td>20<sup>th</sup></td><td>461</td><td>143 ± 16</td><td>48 ± 5</td><td>120 ± 4</td><td>64 ± 4</td><td>164 ± 10</td><td>4 ± 1</td></tr><tr><td>21<sup>th</sup></td><td>179</td><td>106 ± 10</td><td>38 ± 3</td><td>115 ± 6</td><td>58 ± 3</td><td>156 ± 4</td><td>1 ± 1</td></tr></tbody></table>

Wmax. Maximal Aerobic Power Output; HR. Heart Rate; RPE. rate of perceived exertion

Data are presented as mean ± SD

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275332.t003

between 38 and 52% with a mean of 45% (normalized power). Lastly, the average RPE was between 1 and 7 with a mean of 4 (Table 3).

Mean body weight was significantly reduced after 21 days of cycling (59.6 ± 9.7 vs. 58.2 ± 9.4 kg, *p* = 0.02). From the CPET performed 48 hours after the end of the event, we observed an increase of maximal aerobic power output (287.9 ± 20.0 to 328.3 ± 27.1 W, *p* = 0.03; 4.9 ± 0.8 to 5.6 ± 0.7 W/kg, *p* = 0.01) without any change in maximal oxygen uptake (53.5 ± 11.0 vs. 52.9 ± 7.5 mL.min.kg⁻¹, *p* = 0.9).

## Cardiac morphology

Resting HR measured at the time of echocardiography did not vary during the event (Table 4).

Resting cardiac dimensions did not significantly change whatever the cavity analyzed; indeed none of the volumes, diameters or surfaces at D3, D7, D12, D13 or D23 time point was significantly different from baseline.

## Cardiac function

LV systolic and diastolic function did not significantly change during the 23 days of cycling (Table 5).
<table><caption>Table 4. Rest cardiac dimensions measured by echocardiography.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Baseline</th><th>D3</th><th>D7</th><th>D12</th><th>D13</th><th>D23</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Resting heart rate</strong></td><td>55.7 ± 6.8</td><td>68.2 ± 11.6</td><td>68.0 ± 8.3</td><td>56.7 ± 6.8</td><td>55.5 ± 6.2</td><td>63.3 ± 8.3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>LV Morphology</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>LV ED D (mm)</td><td>48.9 ± 4.0</td><td>49.6 ± 4.2</td><td>47.4 ± 3.5</td><td>46.7 ± 2.7</td><td>47.7 ± 2.4</td><td>47.6 ± 1.6</td></tr><tr><td>LV ED D i (mm.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>30.2 ± 3.7</td><td>30.5 ± 4.4</td><td>29.4 ± 3.8</td><td>28.9 ± 3.3</td><td>29.5 ± 3.0</td><td>29.4 ± 2.5</td></tr><tr><td>LV ES D (mm)</td><td>28.9 ± 4.0</td><td>30.4 ± 1.4</td><td>29.1 ± 3.0</td><td>28.8 ± 1.1</td><td>29.8 ± 2.3</td><td>29.1 ± 0.9</td></tr><tr><td>LV ES D i (mm.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>18.0 ± 3.8</td><td>18.7 ± 1.8</td><td>18.1 ± 3.0</td><td>17.7 ± 1.3</td><td>18.4 ± 2.6</td><td>18.0 ± 1.8</td></tr><tr><td>LV ED V (mL.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>97.0 ± 22.4</td><td>96.3 ± 15.0</td><td>89.6 ± 19.5</td><td>90.5 ± 10.2</td><td>90.1 ± 15.3</td><td>79.5 ± 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>LV ED V i (mL.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>59.4 ± 11.3</td><td>59.0 ± 9.0</td><td>54.4 ± 7.3</td><td>55.5 ± 4.3</td><td>55.1 ± 6.5</td><td>48.6 ± 7.3</td></tr><tr><td>LV ES V (mL.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>29.7 ± 8.6</td><td>32.1 ± 6.6</td><td>26.7 ± 4.4</td><td>30.2 ± 4.2</td><td>30.7 ± 9.6</td><td>26.9 ± 7.5</td></tr><tr><td>LV ES V i (mL.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>18.2 ± 5.0</td><td>19.8 ± 4.6</td><td>16.3 ± 1.7</td><td>18.5 ± 2.1</td><td>18.8 ± 4.9</td><td>16.5 ± 4.0</td></tr><tr><td>Stroke volume (mL)</td><td>67.3 ± 15.6</td><td>64.2 ± 9.2</td><td>62.9 ± 16.7</td><td>60.3 ± 8.1</td><td>59.3 ± 10.1</td><td>52.5 ± 11.4</td></tr><tr><td>IVS ED D (mm)</td><td>8.4 ± 0.7</td><td>8.2 ± 0.8</td><td>7.9 ± 0.8</td><td>7.6 ± 0.3</td><td>7.8 ± 0.7</td><td>7.6 ± 0.8</td></tr><tr><td>IVS ED D i (mm.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>5.2 ± 0.4</td><td>5.0 ± 0.7</td><td>4.9 ± 0.7</td><td>4.7 ± 0.5</td><td>4.8 ± 0.6</td><td>4.7 ± 0.7</td></tr><tr><td>LV PW ED (mm)</td><td>8.2 ± 0.8</td><td>8.2 ± 0.7</td><td>8.1 ± 0.7</td><td>7.9 ± 0.7</td><td>7.3 ± 1.0</td><td>7.5 ± 0.8</td></tr><tr><td>LV PW ED i (mm.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>5.0 ± 0.5</td><td>5.0 ± 0.7</td><td>5.0 ± 0.4</td><td>4.9 ± 0.7</td><td>4.5 ± 0.7</td><td>4.6 ± 0.3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>RV Morphology</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RV EDA (cm<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>14.9 ± 2.2</td><td>15.7 ± 2.1</td><td>15.4 ± 1.8</td><td>15.5 ± 4.9</td><td>17.7 ± 3.4</td><td>15.7 ± 2.6</td></tr><tr><td>RV EDA i (cm<sup>-2</sup>.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>9.1 ± 1.2</td><td>9.7 ± 1.8</td><td>9.5 ± 1.3</td><td>9.6 ± 3.3</td><td>11.0 ± 2.8</td><td>9.6 ± 1.5</td></tr><tr><td>RV ESA (cm<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>8.1 ± 1.3</td><td>8.5 ± 1.1</td><td>8.1 ± 1.5</td><td>8.4 ± 2.6</td><td>9.6 ± 2.4</td><td>8.0 ± 2.2</td></tr><tr><td>RV ESA i (cm<sup>-2</sup>.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>5.0 ± 0.7</td><td>5.2 ± 1.0</td><td>5.0 ± 1.1</td><td>5.2 ± 1.8</td><td>6.0 ± 1.7</td><td>4.9 ± 1.3</td></tr><tr><td>RV D1 (mm)</td><td>34.1 ± 3.5</td><td>39.5 ± 4.9</td><td>33.6 ± 2.9</td><td>33.7 ± 4.4</td><td>36.0 ± 2.9</td><td>37.0 ± 4.1</td></tr><tr><td>RV D1 i (mm.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>21.1 ± 2.7</td><td>24.4 ± 4.6</td><td>20.7 ± 2.1</td><td>20.9 ± 4.0</td><td>22.4 ± 3.4</td><td>22.9 ± 3.4</td></tr><tr><td>RV D2 (mm)</td><td>27.9 ± 2.2</td><td>28.9 ± 1.8</td><td>30.1 ± 3.6</td><td>30.2 ± 3.5</td><td>30.6 ± 2.0</td><td>31.0 ± 4.0</td></tr><tr><td>RV D2 i (mm.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>17.3 ± 2.3</td><td>17.8 ± 2.5</td><td>18.6 ± 2.9</td><td>18.7 ± 3.3</td><td>18.9 ± 2.1</td><td>19.0 ± 2.0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>LA Morphology</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>LA V (mL)</td><td>42.5 ± 12.1</td><td>49.1 ± 9.5</td><td>49.8 ± 9.5</td><td>40.5 ± 10.4</td><td>46.0 ± 5.7</td><td>40.0 ± 12.4</td></tr><tr><td>LA V i (mL.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>25.9 ± 6.3</td><td>30.4 ± 7.9</td><td>30.9 ± 7.5</td><td>24.8 ± 5.9</td><td>28.2 ± 4.3</td><td>24.3 ± 6.3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>RA Morphology</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RA V (mL)</td><td>33.7 ± 10.0</td><td>39.7 ± 6.8</td><td>36.9 ± 13.8</td><td>39.2 ± 7.2</td><td>39.8 ± 4.7</td><td>33.1 ± 6.3</td></tr><tr><td>RA V i (mL.m<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>20.7 ± 5.9</td><td>24.5 ± 5.4</td><td>22.2 ± 6.6</td><td>24.1 ± 4.2</td><td>24.5 ± 2.9</td><td>20.3 ± 3.4</td></tr></tbody></table>

S. surface; D. diameter. V. volume; RA. right atria; LA. left atria; RV. right ventricle; LV. left ventricle; ED. end-diastolic; ES. end-systolic; Ao. aorte; IVS. intra ventricular septum; PW. posterior wall; RV D1. basal RV linear dimension; RV D2. mid-cavity RV linear dimension; i. indexed for body surface area
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical differences with the baseline: * (p < 0.05). ** (p < 0.01). *** (p < 0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275332.t004

None of the EF, tissue doppler peak velocity (s') or GLS values was different from baseline. RV systolic function evaluated by TAPSE (Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion), FAC (Fractional area change), tissue Doppler or strain, was unchanged. Concerning atria, we also noted no alteration of LA and RA function. Reservoir, conduit and pump functions were not modified all along the event.

Discussion

The aim of this case study was to investigate the impact of a long-lasting and moderate-intensity stage cycling event on cardiac function of 7 well-trained young female cyclists. No significant modification was observed all along the event, whatever the cavity studied. Thus, the repeated and prolonged moderate endurance exercise performed by our population seems insufficiently stressful to impair cardiac function.
<table><caption>Table 5. Rest cardiac function parameters measured by echocardiography.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Baseline</th><th>D3</th><th>D7</th><th>D12</th><th>D13</th><th>D23</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>LV systolic function</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>EF (%)</td><td>69.5 ± 4.1</td><td>66.9 ± 3.1</td><td>69.6 ± 4.5</td><td>66.5 ± 3.6</td><td>66.2 ± 6.8</td><td>66.2 ± 5.5</td></tr><tr><td>S' (cm.s<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>9.6 ± 1.4</td><td>10.0 ± 2.1</td><td>10.8 ± 0.6</td><td>10.1 ± 1.1</td><td>10.7 ± 0.7</td><td>11.4 ± 1.7</td></tr><tr><td>Global L Strain (%)</td><td>-21.6 ± 2.4</td><td>-17.7 ± 5.3</td><td>-22.2 ± 2.1</td><td>-21.8 ± 2.6</td><td>-21.0 ± 2.0</td><td>-19.3 ± 2.1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>LV diastolic function</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>E (cm.s<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>91.3 ± 11.5</td><td>85.4 ± 4.8</td><td>106.4 ± 13.7</td><td>88.7 ± 11.5</td><td>87.0 ± 16.3</td><td>84.7 ± 11.1</td></tr><tr><td>A (cm.s<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>41.3 ± 12.0</td><td>45.8 ± 5.2</td><td>48.9 ± 8.5</td><td>46.4 ± 8.1</td><td>42.4 ± 6.9</td><td>49.1 ± 10.1</td></tr><tr><td>E/A</td><td>2.4 ± 0.8</td><td>1.9 ± 0.3</td><td>2.2 ± 0.4</td><td>2.0 ± 0.5</td><td>2.1 ± 0.6</td><td>1.8 ± 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>E/e'</td><td>5.7 ± 1.3</td><td>5.9 ± 0.7</td><td>6.0 ± 1.1</td><td>5.8 ± 0.5</td><td>5.5 ± 0.9</td><td>5.3 ± 0.8</td></tr><tr><td>e' (cm.s<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>16.7 ± 2.9</td><td>14.7 ± 1.6</td><td>18.1 ± 2.9</td><td>15.4 ± 2.3</td><td>15.8 ± 2.2</td><td>16.3 ± 2.7</td></tr><tr><td>a' (cm.s<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>7.1 ± 2.7</td><td>6.8 ± 1.1</td><td>14.1 ± 10.5</td><td>6.9 ± 1.3</td><td>7.1 ± 1.2</td><td>8.6 ± 1.2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>RV systolic function</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>TAPSE (mm)</td><td>23.9 ± 4.4</td><td>26.4 ± 3.4</td><td>27.4 ± 4.3</td><td>23.8 ± 4.7</td><td>25.0 ± 4.8</td><td>21.6 ± 3.4</td></tr><tr><td>FAC (%)</td><td>45.3 ± 7.1</td><td>45.8 ± 1.9</td><td>47.6 ± 8.7</td><td>43.3 ± 6.5</td><td>43.1 ± 8.2</td><td>48.8 ± 8.0</td></tr><tr><td>S' (cm.s<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>12.7 ± 1.7</td><td>14.4 ± 1.5</td><td>17.0 ± 2.0</td><td>13.9 ± 2.2</td><td>15.0 ± 2.3</td><td>14.7 ± 3.5</td></tr><tr><td>Global L Strain (%)</td><td>-25.6 ± 2.2</td><td>-28.0 ± 2.8</td><td>-27.0 ± 5.4</td><td>-25.2 ± 2.4</td><td>-25.3 ± 5.5</td><td>-25.9 ± 3.1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>RA function</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Reservoir (%)</td><td>47.8 ± 15.5</td><td>35.0 ± 13.8</td><td>39.0 ± 9.7</td><td>43.6 ± 14.8</td><td>40.9 ± 10.2</td><td>34.5 ± 13.3</td></tr><tr><td>Conduit (%)</td><td>37.6 ± 10.5</td><td>23.0 ± 11.2</td><td>29.6 ± 9.8</td><td>32.3 ± 11.6</td><td>30.7 ± 9.4</td><td>22.7 ± 9.9</td></tr><tr><td>Pump (%)</td><td>10.2 ± 5.9</td><td>12.0 ± 3.6</td><td>9.4 ± 1.5</td><td>11.3 ± 6.1</td><td>10.2 ± 1.6</td><td>11.8 ± 5.7</td></tr><tr><td><strong>LA function</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Reservoir (%)</td><td>44.5 ± 9.9</td><td>37.6 ± 7.5</td><td>45.6 ± 7.2</td><td>53.0 ± 16.2</td><td>57.4 ± 20.0</td><td>43.3 ± 5.7</td></tr><tr><td>Conduit (%)</td><td>31.9 ± 8.5</td><td>24.9 ± 6.4</td><td>32.4 ± 7.7</td><td>39.6 ± 13.8</td><td>45.1 ± 20.7</td><td>29.2 ± 6.6</td></tr><tr><td>Pump (%)</td><td>12.6 ± 2.4</td><td>12.7 ± 1.2</td><td>13.2 ± 2.1</td><td>13.4 ± 3.0</td><td>12.2 ± 4.0</td><td>14.1 ± 4.3</td></tr></tbody></table>

TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; EF, ejection fraction; SF, shortening fraction; L, longitudinal; S E et A, Peak S. E and A-wave velocities of the mitral inflow using pulsed-wave Doppler; LV S' E' et A' peak velocities during systole (S') and early (E') and late (A') diastole using tissue doppler imaging at mitral annulus (tricuspid annulus for RV).

Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical differences with the baseline: * (p < 0.05). ** (p < 0.01). *** (p < 0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275332.t005

## Effects of cycling event on echocardiographic ventricular parameters

The moderate-intensity cycling event performed did not negatively alter the systolic bi-ventricular function and the diastolic LV function of the athletes studied. At a first glance, these results tend to disagree with most publications on this topic. Indeed, previous data reported a transient decrease of ventricular systolic function after prolonged multistage exercise [7, 10, 16–18]. The systolic dysfunction severity seemed to be positively related to the characteristics of the endurance exercise carried out such as its intensity and duration. Indeed, the more intense, prolonged and repeated exercise, the greater the alteration of ejection fraction [7, 10, 16–18]. In our study, athletes completed a very long duration cycling event: 23 days, 21 stages, 3529 km, 154 hours with a with a mean stage duration of 7 hours and 20 minutes; longer than in most previous studies [7, 10, 16–18]. For example, in these, the event included between 2 and 20 stages. But, with respect to the percentage of maximal heart rate (58–71%) and maximal aerobic power output (38–52%) sustained during each stage, the intensity of exercise was moderate and less intense than in most previous studies [7, 10, 16–18]. For example, in these, the percentage of maximal heart rate sustained during each stage was between 55 and 85. The shorter the event (number of stage), the higher the sustained intensity. Thus, the lower exercise
intensity in our study could explain, at least in part, the absence of signs of systolic bi-ventricular and LV diastolic dysfunction. Indeed, the prolonged moderate aerobic exercise maintained during all the event by the cyclists may allow the cardiovascular system to adapt to prolonged moderate stress, thereby minimizing the probability of adverse effects on cardiac function [16]. This could also explain the lack of V O$_2$ max improvement observed in athletes [27]. The observed increase of the mechanical performance (i.e maximal power output) at the end of the event could be explained by a better pedaling efficiency [28] although we cannot measure it.

Sex could also play a role in the lack of systolic bi-ventricular and LV diastolic dysfunction related to exercise observed in this study. Indeed, only studies including exclusively male athletes have reported a decrease in ventricular function [6, 10, 15, 17]. Therefore, the absence of echocardiographic cardiac fatigue signs we observed could be due to a better cardiovascular tolerance of female athletes to prolonged moderate endurance exercise. Although the cardiovascular response of female athletes to long duration exercise are poorly documented, Daniels-son et al. (2017) reported lower myocardial damage assessed by biomarkers, in female than in male triathletes after an ironman-distance triathlon [29].

## Effects of cycling event on echocardiographic atrial parameters

We observed no alteration in right and left RA atrial function all along the event. Reservoir, conduit and pump function were not modified whatever the cavity considered. This is not consistent with a previous study, which demonstrated that right atrial reservoir function was the first to be affected by the increase in endurance exercise load [13, 30]. According to our previous study, the echocardiographic cascade of alterations indicative of exercise-induced cardiac fatigue seems to begin with an alteration of speckle tracking derived parameters of diastolic function. (i.e., atrial reservoir function) [13]. Thus, as explained for the ventricular function, the absence of atrial function alteration can be explained by the fact that the cardiovascular workload induces by the event it not enough to induce the beginnings of exercise-induced cardiac fatigue.

## Limitations of the study

The major limitation of this study is the small number of athletes, which inevitably limits the scope of the study. Indeed, with our small sample, we cannot deny a possible type 2 error that is a non-rejection of the null hypothesis when it would be rejected with a larger sample. However, it must be taken into account the great technical difficulty of studying more athletes during such a long stage endurance event. These technical difficulties associated with the heavy and specific daily logistic (time constraints) also explain why we were not able to perform day-to-day assessments of cardiac function during the whole duration cycling event. Similarly, the immediate return to real life of the athletes at the end of the event (each in her city/country) did not allow following them up few hours and/or few days later. Finally, due to the long time of the study (23 days), it was impossible for us to get support from a single cardiologist. This constitute a bias due to possible inter-operator variability.

## Conclusions and perspectives

In the context of our study, the long-lasting moderate-intensity stage cycling event was not associated with cardiac function alteration. Our results are rather reassuring for medical community and athletes given their increase participation in ultra-endurance events. Nevertheless, we must be careful in interpreting them due to the limits of an underpowered study. Further analysis should be performed on a much larger sample to complete this study case.
**Acknowledgments**

The authors gratefully acknowledge the enthusiastic participation of the subjects in this study and the generous technical support of the following cardiologists and scientists: Jean-Yves Beigbeder, Stéphane Doutreleau, Christophe Hédon, Jean-Philippe Mathieu, Stéphane Nottin, Brice Touraut.

**Author Contributions**

**Conceptualization:** Solène Le Douairon Lahaye, Gaëlle Kervio, David Matelot, François Carré, Frédéric Schnell.

**Data curation:** Solène Le Douairon Lahaye.

**Formal analysis:** Solène Le Douairon Lahaye, Gaëlle Kervio, Vincent Menard, Anna Barrero, Thibault Lachard, Guy Carrault, David Matelot, François Carré, Frédéric Schnell.

**Investigation:** Solène Le Douairon Lahaye, Vincent Menard, Anna Barrero, Thibault Lachard, Guy Carrault, David Matelot, François Carré, Frédéric Schnell.

**Methodology:** Solène Le Douairon Lahaye, Frédéric Schnell.

**Writing – original draft:** Solène Le Douairon Lahaye, François Carré, Frédéric Schnell.

**Writing – review & editing:** Solène Le Douairon Lahaye, Gaëlle Kervio, Vincent Menard, Anna Barrero, Thibault Lachard, Guy Carrault, David Matelot, François Carré, Frédéric Schnell.

**References**

1. Dawson E, George K, Shave R, Whyte G, Ball D. Does the human heart fatigue subsequent to prolonged exercise? Sports Med. 2003; 33(5):365-80. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200333050-00003 PMID: 12696984

2. Middleton N, Shave R, George K, Whyte G, Hart E, Atkinson G. Left ventricular function immediately following prolonged exercise: A meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. avr 2006; 38(4):681-7. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000210203.10200.12 PMID: 16679983

3. Oxborough D, Birch K, Shave R, George K. « Exercise-induced cardiac fatigue »—a review of the echocardiographic literature. Echocardiography. oct 2010; 27(9):1130-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01251.x PMID: 20678128

4. Elliott AD, La Gerche A. The right ventricle following prolonged endurance exercise: are we overlooking the more important side of the heart? A meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. juin 2015; 49(11):724-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-093895 PMID: 25281542

5. Lord RN, Utomi V, Oxborough DL, Curry BA, Brown M, George KP. Left ventricular function and mechanics following prolonged endurance exercise: an update and meta-analysis with insights from novel techniques. Eur J Appl Physiol. juil 2018; 118(7):1291-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3906-z PMID: 29869711

6. Rifai N, Douglas PS, O'Toole M, Rimm E, Ginsburg GS. Cardiac troponin T and I, echocardiographic [correction of electrocardiographic] wall motion analyses, and ejection fractions in athletes participating in the Hawaii Ironman Triathlon. Am J Cardiol. 1 avr 1999; 83(7):1085-9.

7. Shave RE, Dawson E, Whyte G, George K, Ball D, Gaze DC, et al. Evidence of exercise-induced cardiac dysfunction and elevated cTnT in separate cohorts competing in an ultra-endurance mountain marathon race. Int J Sports Med. oct 2002; 23(7):489-94. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35069 PMID: 12402180

8. Shave R, George KP, Atkinson G, Hart E, Middleton N, Whyte G, et al. Exercise-induced cardiac troponin T release: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. déc 2007; 39(12):2099-106. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e318153ff78 PMID: 18046180

9. Scharhag J, Herrmann M, Urhausen A, Haschke M, Herrmann W, Kindermann W. Independent elevations of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponins in endurance athletes after prolonged strenuous exercise. Am Heart J. déc 2005; 150(6):1128-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.01.051 PMID: 16338248
10. Middleton N, Shave R, George K, Whyte G, Hart E, Oxborough D, et al. Altered left ventricular diastolic filling following a marathon is a reproducible phenomenon. Int J Cardiol. 31 oct 2007; 122(1):87-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.11.042 PMID: 17222472

11. La Gerche A, Connelly KA, Mooney DJ, Maclsaac AI, Prior DL. Biochemical and functional abnormalities of left and right ventricular function after ultra-endurance exercise. Heart. juill 2008; 94(7):860-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.101063 PMID: 17483127

12. Neilan TG, Ton-Nu TT, Jassal DS, Popovic ZB, Douglas PS, Halpern EF, et al. Myocardial adaptation to short-term high-intensity exercise in highly trained athletes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. oct 2006; 19 (10):1280-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2006.05.001 PMID: 17000368

13. Charton M, Kervio G, Matelot D, Lachard T, Galli E, Donal E, et al. Exercise-Induced Cardiac Fatigue in Soldiers Assessed by Echocardiography. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:785869. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.785869 PMID: 34988130

14. Shave RE, Dawson E, Whyte G, George K, Gaze D, Collinson P. Effect of prolonged exercise in a hypoxic environment on cardiac function and cardiac troponin T. Br J Sports Med. févr 2004; 38(1):86-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2002.002832 PMID: 14751955

15. Whyte GP, George K, Sharma S, Lumley S, Gates P, Prasad K, et al. Cardiac fatigue following prolonged endurance exercise of differing distances. Med Sci Sports Exerc. juin 2000; 32(6):1067-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200006000-00005 PMID: 10862531

16. Morville T, Rosenkilde M, Mattsson N, Dela F, Helge JW, Rasmusen HK. 2706 km cycling in 2 weeks: effects on cardiac function in 6 elderly male athletes. Phys Sportsmed. sept 2018; 46(3):263-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2018.1477403 PMID: 29770745

17. Williams K, Gregson W, Robertson C, Datson N, Whyte G, Murrell C, et al. Alterations in left ventricular function and cardiac biomarkers as a consequence of repetitive endurance cycling. European Journal of Sport Science. 1 mars 2009; 9:97-105.

18. Oosthuysse T, Avidon I, Likuwa I, Woodiwiss AJ. Progression of changes in left ventricular function during four days of simulated multi-stage cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol. juin 2012; 112(6):2243-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2201-z PMID: 21997679

19. Ogles B, Masters K, Richardson SA. Obligatory running and gender: An analysis of participative motives and training habits. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1 janv 1995; 26:233-48.

20. Malchrowicz-Mośko E, Mósko, Młodzik M, León-Guereño P, Adamczewska K. Male and Female Motivations for Participating in a Mass Cycling Race for Amateurs. The Skoda Bike Challenge Case Study. Sustainability. 24 nov 2019; 11.

21. Barnes JN, Fu Q. Sex-Specific Ventricular and Vascular Adaptations to Exercise. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018; 1065:329-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77932-4_21 PMID: 30051394

22. Barrero A, Schnell F, Carrault G, Kervio G, Matelot D, Carré F, et al. Daily fatigue-recovery balance monitoring with heart rate variability in well-trained female cyclists on the Tour de France circuit. PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0213472. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213472 PMID: 30845249

23. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. janv 2015; 28(1):1-39.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003 PMID: 25559473

24. Geyer H, Caracciolo G, Abe H, Wilansky S, Carerj S, Gentile F, et al. Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications—PubMed [Internet]. [cité 16 juill 2021]. Disponible sur: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20362924/

25. Badano LP, Kolias TJ, Muraru D, Abraham TP, Aurigemma G, Edvardsen T, et al. Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 1 juin 2018; 19(6):591-600. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey042 PMID: 29596561

26. Borg G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990; 16 Suppl 1:55-8. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1815 PMID: 2345867

27. Billat LV. Interval training for performance: a scientific and empirical practice. Special recommendations for middle- and long-distance running. Part I: aerobic interval training. Sports Med. 2001; 31(1):13-31. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200131010-00002 PMID: 11219499

28. Leirdal S, Ettema G. The relationship between cadence, pedalling technique and gross efficiency in cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol. déc 2011; 111(12):2885-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1914-3 PMID: 21437606
29. Danielsson T, Carlsson J, Schreyer H, Ahnesjö J, Ten Siethoff L, Ragnarsson T, et al. Blood biomarkers in male and female participants after an Ironman-distance triathlon. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0179324. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179324 PMID: 28609447

30. Sanz-de la Garza M, Grazioli G, Bijnens BH, Sarvari SI, Guasch E, Pajuelo C, et al. Acute, Exercise Dose-Dependent Impairment in Atrial Performance During an Endurance Race: 2D Ultrasound Speckle-Tracking Strain Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. déc 2016; 9(12):1380–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.03.016 PMID: 27544898