# A study on transmission of Peste des petits ruminants virus between dromedary camels and small ruminants

Intisar Kamil Saeed, Moez Abdulrahman Haj, Sahar Mohamed Alhassan, Shaza Mohamed Mutwakil, Baraa Ahmed Mohammed, Khalid Mohammed Taha, Genevieve Libeau, Adama Diallo, Yahia Hassan Ali, Abdelmalik Ibrahim Khalafalla

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Intisar Kamil Saeed, Moez Abdulrahman Haj, Sahar Mohamed Alhassan, Shaza Mohamed Mutwakil, Baraa Ahmed Mohammed, et al.. A study on transmission of Peste des petits ruminants virus between dromedary camels and small ruminants. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 2022, 16 (2), pp.374-382. 10.3855/jidc.14947. hal-03636797

HAL Id: hal-03636797

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03636797

Submitted on 11 Apr 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
Original Article

# A study on transmission of Peste des petits ruminants virus between dromedary camels and small ruminants

Intisar Kamil Saeed¹,², Moez Abdulrahman Haj¹, Sahar Mohamed Alhassan¹, Shaza Mohamed Mutwakil¹, Baraa Ahmed Mohammed¹, Khalid Mohammed Taha³, Genevieve Libeau⁴, Adama Diallo⁵, Yahia Hassan Ali¹,², Abdelmalik Ibrahim Khalafalla⁶,⁷

¹ Virology Department, Central Veterinary Research laboratories, Al Amarat, Khartoum, Sudan

² Biology Department, Faculty of Science, and Arts, Rafha, Northern Border University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

³ Atbara Veterinary Research Laboratory, River Nile State, Sudan

⁴ Biological Systems Department - CIRAD Control of Exotic and Emerging Animal Diseases (UMR15) TA A-15/G Campus Int. Baillarguet 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

⁵ UMR-ASTRE, Biological Systems Department - CIRAD Conseiller du Directeur de l'ISRA-LNERV ISRA-LNERV BP:2057 Dakar-Hann, Sénégal

⁶ Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Khartoum, Shambat, Khartoum North, Sudan

⁷ Veterinary Laboratories Division, Abu Dhabi Agriculture and Food Safety Authority (ADAFSA), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

## Abstract

**Introduction:** In recent years Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) disease caused several epidemics in a wide range of susceptible hosts. The ability of the peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) to cross the species barrier necessitates further research, particularly on disease circulation and cross-species transmission between typical and atypical hosts to guide and facilitate the eradication program anticipated by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) in 2030. The aim of this study is to explore the role of dromedary camels as transmitters for PPR.

**Methodology:** Four experiments were carried out on clinically healthy seronegative camels, sheep and goats. In experiment I, the animals were inoculated with a PPR-positive suspension of camel pneumonic lung homogenate. In the other three experiments either sheep and goats were inoculated and after three days were housed with camels or vice versa.

**Results:** Marked clinical signs suggestive of PPR were seen in sheep and goats while camels showed mild infection. Severe clinical signs of PPR were seen in sheep and goats when kept with inoculated camels. Postmortem examination revealed PPR lesions in all inoculated animals including camels.

**Conclusions:** This study showed that dromedary camels infected with PPRV can transmit the disease to sheep and goats, even when they developed mild clinical signs.

**Key words:** PPR, camel, sheep, goat, infection, transmission.

J Infect Dev Ctries 2022; 16(2):374-382. doi:10.3855/jidc.14947

(Received 21 February 2021 – Accepted 09 June 2021)

Copyright © 2022 Saeed et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## Introduction

Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is a severe fast spreading disease affecting mainly domestic small ruminants and characterized by sudden onset of depression, fever, discharge from the eyes and nose, soreness in the mouth, disturbed breathing and cough, foul smelling diarrhea and death [1]. This disease is one of the most economically important trans-boundary animal diseases as it causes death of small ruminants, hence impacting the livelihoods, food security and nutrition of millions poor people in developing countries. Outbreaks of PPR in sheep and goats in Africa and Asia are extensively reported.

According to OIE- World Animal Health Information System (WAHIS) data, PPR outbreaks have been reported in almost all countries except those in the southern region of Africa, including Zimbabwe, Botswana, Namibia, and South Africa. In Asia, outbreaks of PPR have been reported in Afghanistan, Bahrain, Bhutan, Iraq, Israel, Kuwait, Mongolia, Nepal, Oman, Palestine, Tajikistan, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Yemen as depicted in OIE-WAHIS data, Pakistan [2-4], Bangladesh [5], India [6], Iran [7] and China [8,9].

PPR is mainly a disease that affects small ruminants, however reports describing the infection in
camels are continuously published from different production zones. Ismail *et al.* were the first to detect PPR antibodies in Sudanese camels in Egypt [10]. Roger *et al.* reviewed a new acute febrile epizootic disease characterized by highly contagious respiratory syndrome with elevated morbidity and low mortality rates in camel in Ethiopia during 1995-1996 [11]. Formal contacts revealed the presence of a similar camel disease incidence in Djibouti, Somalia, Eritrea, and Sudan. Detection of PPR virus (PPRV) antigen by antigen-detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and antibodies by antibody-detection ELISA and PPRV RNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) have been reported in these outbreaks. Roger *et al.* detected PPR antibodies in 7.8% of camels after occurrence of respiratory outbreak [12]. In Sudan PPRV antibodies were detected in camel sera [13-15]. In August 2004, a massive outbreak of disease with diarrhea and respiratory problems and up to 50% mortality in camels was reported in eastern Sudan. PPRV antigen and genes were detected in affected animals using immunocapture ELISA assay (Ic-ELISA) and RT-PCR, respectively, and partial genome sequences obtained [16,17]. It was noticed that PPR outbreak had been reported in sheep in the same area prior to the camel outbreak [16].

Recently, PPR outbreaks have been reported in
camel in Iran [18] and Kenya [19]. These recent disease
outbreaks necessitate investigating the exact role
camels may play in the epidemiology in the affected
zones. Within the atypical hosts of PPR such as pigs,
buffaloes, and wild animals, the camels are distinctive
in that they are geographically distributed within the
PPR endemic areas of the world and herded together
with the typical host, the small ruminants, in most parts
of Africa and Asia and their numbers are increasing
significantly. Accordingly, this work is intended to
explore this debatable role of camels through
experimental infection of camel, sheep, and goats by
PPR virus originating from camel and sheep.

**Methodology**

Animals

All animals used in the four experiments were
clinically healthy, belonging to local breeds, and
sourced from areas with no history of either PPR
vaccination or outbreak. All animals were screened
seronegative for PPR using competitive ELISA (c-
ELISA) [20]. The kit was obtained from the French
Agricultural Research Centre for International
Development (CIRAD), Montpellier, France. The
OIE/FAO/European Union (EU) reference Laboratory

designed and validated the kit. Dromedary camels
(Camelus dromedarius) of the local Arabi breed at the
age of 2-3 years were brought from Central Sudan
(Gezira state) and Western Sudan (Kordofan state).
Sheep (Ovis aries) of the local Sahrawi breed in Sudan
at the age of 8-12 months and Goats (Capra aegagrus
hircus) of the Nubian goat breed in Sudan at the age of
8-12 months were brought from Khartoum state. The
experiments were carried out in the closed semi-
isolated animal house at the Central Veterinary
Research laboratories (CVRL) in Khartoum, Sudan,
with strict Biosecurity measures, including wearing
protective clothing and rubber boots. Animals were
kept at the animal house for 3 weeks prior to the
experiments, during which they received anti-parasitic
medicines and multivitamins, and were observed for
general health condition. The rectal body temperature
was recorded every day at a fixed time in the morning.
The means of body temperature during the
acclimatization period were 36.2 ± 2.2 °C. Between
each experiment (I, II, III and IV) the animal house was
cleaned and disinfected twice by formalin fumigation
before the introduction of new animals.

Inocula preparation

Inoculation of animals was done by the
subcutaneous route using a suspension of lung
homogenate prepared using slaughterhouse-collected
camel or sheep lung infected with PPR virus. A 20%
tissue homogenate in phosphate buffered saline (PBS)
containing antibiotic and antifungal solution was
prepared. After centrifugation at 400 g for 10 minutes,
the supernatants of the camel and sheep lung
homogenates were collected. The homogenates were
tested for PPR antigen using immunocapture ELISA
(Ic-ELISA) and RT-PCR, as described below, and
found positive. Furthermore, the inocula were checked
for the presence of bovine herpes virus-1 (BHV-1),
bovine viral diarrhea (BVD), respiratory syncytial virus
(RSV) and parainfluenza virus 3 (PIV 3) using a
Sandwich ELISA kit (tetra-pulmotest) according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Bio-X Diagnostics,
Jemelle, Belgium) and both lung homogenates from
camel and sheep were found to be free of these
respiratory pathogens.

Experimental design

The animal experiments were approved by the
Ethical Committee on Animal Experiments of the
Central Veterinary Research Laboratories (CVRL),
Sudan. Animals, PPR virus used, and experimental
protocols are summarized in Table 1. In experiment I,
we infected camels, sheep, and goats with a camel-derived PPRV to determine host susceptibility. To determine the animal host-to-animal host contact transmission, we conducted the following experiments. In experiment II-a, 3 sheep were infected with sheep-derived PPRV and were placed in contact with 3 camels, while in II-b, 2 goats were infected with sheep-derived PPRV and were placed in contact with 2 camels. In experiment III-a, 3 sheep were infected with camel-derived PPRV and were placed in contact with 3 camels, while in III-b 2 goats were infected and placed in contact with 2 camels. In the last experiment (IV), 5 camels were infected with camel derived-PPRV and were placed in contact with 5 sheep and 5 goats. Experimentally infected animals were introduced to in-contact animals 3 days post infection. In all experiments, animals were observed daily for the clinical signs of PPR. Body temperature was measured daily in the morning from day 0 of post infection (pi) till the day of the slaughter (21 pi). Blood samples were collected from all animals every 2 days for white blood cells (WBCs) count and weekly for PPR antibodies detection. Slaughtering of all surviving animals was done on day 21 pi.

### Detection of PPR antigen using Ic-ELISA

Lung, spleen, and lymph node samples of dead and slaughtered animals from the four experiments (n = 144) were examined for PPR antigen using Ic-ELISA. The Kits were obtained from CIRAD, Montpellier, France and the test was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

### Detection of PPR N gene using RT-PCR

RNA was extracted from the tissue samples using Qiagen RNeasy Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), as instructed by the manufacturer. Lung samples of inoculated animals in each experiment were tested for PPR genome using RT-PCR. PCR was done using Qiagen One-step RT/PCR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The primers NP3 and NP4, which were selected for the determination of the C-terminus of the N gene of PPRV [21]. Five µL of RNA was amplified in a 45µL reaction mix containing: 10µL of 5X Qiagen buffer, 2µL of dNTP mix, 10µL of Q-solution, 2µL of One Step RT-PCR Mix, each primer at a final concentration of 0.6 µM, and water. Thermal cycler conditions were as follows: reverse transcription 30 minutes at 50 °C, initial PCR activation during 15 minutes at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of amplification corresponding to 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 60 °C, 1 minute at 72°C and final extension of 10 minutes at 72 °C. RT-PCR resulted in an amplification product of 351 bp. Ten µL of the amplified products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.5 % agarose gel.

### Detection of PPR antibodies using c-ELISA

Collected sera from the four experiments (n = 192) were examined for PPR antibodies using c-ELISA obtained from CIRAD, Montpellier, France; the test was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. This test was carried out before the adaptation of this c-ELISA to camels and dromedaries in order to improve the detection of antibodies directed against PPR present in their serum. This task has been

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Study design of peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) experimental infection and transmission trials with dromedary camels, sheep and goats using camel and sheep-derived PPRV for intra-nasal infection. Experimentally infected animals were added to in-contact animals 3 days post infection.</caption><thead><tr><th>Experiment</th><th>Inoculum</th><th>Animal inoculated</th><th>Number (ID* of inoculated animal)</th><th>In contact animals (Number) ID*</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I-a</td><td>PPR-positive camel lung-homogenate</td><td>Dromedary camels</td><td>5 (I-a1-5)</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>I-b</td><td>PPR-positive camel lung-homogenate</td><td>Sheep</td><td>5 (I-b 1-5)</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>I-c</td><td>PPR-positive camel lung homogenate</td><td>Goats</td><td>5 (I-c1-5)</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>II-a</td><td>PPR-positive sheep lung homogenate</td><td>Sheep</td><td>3 (II-a 1-3)</td><td>Dromedary camels (3), II-a D 1-3</td></tr><tr><td>II-b</td><td>PPR-positive sheep lung homogenate</td><td>Goats</td><td>2 (II-b 1-2)</td><td>Dromedary camels (2), II-b D 1-2</td></tr><tr><td>III-a</td><td>PPR-positive camel lung homogenate</td><td>Sheep</td><td>3 (III-a 1-3)</td><td>Dromedary camels (3), III-a D 1-3</td></tr><tr><td>III-b</td><td>PPR-positive camel lung homogenate</td><td>Goats</td><td>2 (III-b 1-2)</td><td>Dromedary camels (2), III-b D 1-2</td></tr><tr><td>IV</td><td>PPR-positive camel lung homogenate</td><td>Dromedary camels</td><td>5 (IV 1-5)</td><td>Sheep (5), IV-S 1-5 + Goats (5), IV-G 1-5</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote>* ID: Identity of animal in the experiment; D: dromedary (*Camelus dromedarius*) at the age of 2-3 years; breed: local Arabi camel breed of Sudan; S: sheep (*Ovis aries*) at the age of 8-12 months, breed: local sheep breed of Sudan; G: goat (*Capra aegagrus hircus*) at the age of 8-12 months, breed: Nubian goat breed of Sudan.</footnote>
done since then and has resulted in improving the competitiveness of the serum of the camelids (having only one antibody fragment out of two) so that it has better affinity relative to the monoclonal antibody used in the test.

## Results

### *Experiment I: Host susceptibility*

#### *Dromedary camels*

The five dromedary camels inoculated with PPR-positive camel lung homogenate remained clinically healthy, except for slight fever and leukocytosis. They showed slight increase in temperature (38.6 – 38.8 °C) on days 7-11 pi. Total WBCs count decreased slightly (5750- 7500 cells/µL) on day 4 pi, and then markedly increased in four camels (16700 – 22200 cells/µL), reaching up to 37,000 cells/µL in one camel (ID-2) at day 14 pi.

#### *Sheep*

All sheep inoculated with PPR-positive camel lung-homogenate showed leukocytosis that reached up to 20,200 cell/µL in three animals (I-b 2, 3, 4), and fever (38.9-39.0 °C) followed by depression, nasal and lacrimal discharges, and later mouth ulcers and diarrhea. Sheep IS2 showed fever (39.0 °C) and died on day 8 pi.

#### *Goats*

In goats inoculated with PPR-positive camel lung-homogenate, typical clinical signs of PPR were observed. In all goats, total WBCs decreased (7500–8900 cells/µL) on day 4 pi, and then markedly increased up to 28,400 cell/µL. High fever (> 39 °C), coughing, and nasal discharge started at 3 pi followed by abdominal breathing and lacrimation. Besides these symptoms, two goats (I-c 2, 3) showed slight diarrhea.

No deaths were recorded till the day of slaughtering (21 pi).

### *Postmortem (PM) findings in experiment I*

The inoculated camels, sheep and goats were euthanized on the day 21 pi. The postmortem observations in euthanized, and the dead sheep (I-b 2) were mainly congestion in lung, spleen, liver, intestine (enteritis), colon, slight congestion in kidneys, some tonsils and lymph nodes and blood vessels supplying the digestive organs. The spleen in some sheep and goats was found enlarged. Severe congestion was seen in some lymph nodes, especially the mesenteric ones.

### *Detection of PPR antigen in tissue samples using Ic-ELISA and confirmation by RT/PCR*

Lung, spleen, and lymph node samples were collected during postmortem at 21 pi, homogenized, and processed for PPRV detection using Ic-ELISA. Positive results were obtained in samples collected from all the 15-inoculated sheep, goats, and camels (Table 2 experiment I). Three samples out of five from each animal species were tested using in RT/PCR for PPRV genome. All tested samples were found positive.

### *Detection of PPR antibodies using c-ELISA*

Antibodies against PPRV were detected in all sheep and goat sera collected 3 weeks after the experiments, however none of camel sera were positive.

### *Experiment II*

#### *Dromedary camels housed with sheep infected with PPR-positive sheep lung homogenate (II-a-D)*

All inoculated sheep developed symptoms similar to those seen in experiment I-b without mortality. All camels housed with infected sheep showed slight increase in temperature, between 38.5 °C and 38.8 °C on day 7. The temperature was 38.9 °C on day 19 pi in

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Summary for experiments I: II: III and IV of PPRV antigen detection through Ic-ELISA in lung: spleen and lymph node samples of camels: sheep and goats.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Experiment</th><th colspan="3">Camel (positive/tested)</th><th colspan="3">Sheep (positive/tested)</th><th colspan="3">Goat (positive/tested)</th><th rowspan="2">Total (positive/ tested [%])</th></tr><tr><th>Lung</th><th>Spleen</th><th>Lymph node</th><th>Lung</th><th>Spleen</th><th>Lymph node</th><th>Lung</th><th>Spleen</th><th>Lymph node</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I-a</td><td>5/5</td><td>5/5</td><td>5/5</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>15/15 [100]</td></tr><tr><td>I-b</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>5/5</td><td>5/5</td><td>5/5</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>15/15 [100]</td></tr><tr><td>I-c</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>5/5</td><td>5/5</td><td>5/5</td><td>1 5/15 [100]</td></tr><tr><td>II-a</td><td>3/3</td><td>3/3</td><td>3/3</td><td>2/3</td><td>3/3</td><td>2/3</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>16/18 [88.9]</td></tr><tr><td>II-b</td><td>2/2</td><td>2/2</td><td>2/2</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>2/2</td><td>2/2</td><td>2/2</td><td>12/12 [100]</td></tr><tr><td>III-a</td><td>3/3</td><td>2/3</td><td>1/3</td><td>2/3</td><td>2/3</td><td>3/3</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>13/18 [72.2]</td></tr><tr><td>III-b</td><td>2/2</td><td>1/2</td><td>1/2</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>2/2</td><td>2/2</td><td>1/2</td><td>9/12 [75]</td></tr><tr><td>IV</td><td>4/5</td><td>4/5</td><td>4/5</td><td>3/5</td><td>3/5</td><td>3/5</td><td>3/5</td><td>3/5</td><td>3/5</td><td>30/45 [66.7]</td></tr><tr><td>Total (%)</td><td>19/20 (95)</td><td>17/20 (85)</td><td>16/20 (80)</td><td>12/16 (75)</td><td>13/16 (81.3)</td><td>13/16 (81.3)</td><td>12/14 (85.7)</td><td>12/14 (85.7)</td><td>11/14 (78.6)</td><td>125/150 [83.3]</td></tr></tbody></table>
one camel (II-a 4). Leukocytosis (14,600, 22,400 and 19,600 cells/µL) was detected in 3 camels (experiment II-a 1, 2, 3).

### Dromedary camels housed with goats infected with PPR-positive sheep lung homogenate (II-b-D)

Symptoms similar to those seen in experiment I-c were seen in the infected goats. Four out of five in-contact camels showed slight fever and leukocytosis.

### Detection of PPR antigen in tissue samples using Ic-ELISA

Testing lung samples for PPR antigen using Ic-ELISA revealed that all infected sheep and goats were positive, except for one sheep (II-a 2). Ic-ELISA indicated positive results in lung samples collected from all camels exposed to infected sheep and goats (Table 2, experiment II).

### Detection of PPR antibodies using c-ELISA

Antibodies against PPRV were detected in all sheep and goat sera collected at 3 weeks after the experiments, however none of camel sera were found to be positive.

### Experiment III

#### Dromedary camels housed with sheep infected with PPR-positive camel lung homogenate (III-a D)

All inoculated sheep developed symptoms like those seen in experiment I-b without mortality. All camels housed with infected sheep showed slight rise in temperature ranged between 38.7–39.0 °C, as well as leukocytosis (13500–15700 cells/µL).

### Postmortem (PM) finding

In-contact camels were euthanized on day 19 pi and on PM showed congestion in intestine and pneumonia lesion in lung.

### Detection of PPR antigen in tissue samples using Ic-ELISA

Testing tissue samples for PPR antigen using Ic-ELISA showed positive results in three camels (III 1, 4, 5), one sheep (III-a1) and two goats (Table 2, experiment III).

### Detection of PPR antibodies using c-ELISA

All sheep and goat sera collected after the experiments were found positive for PPR antibodies.

### Experiment IV

#### Sheep housed with dromedary camels infected with PPR-positive camel lung homogenate (IV-S)

All infected camels showed mild rise in temperature (38.0–38.6 °C) starting at day 5–6 pi as well as leukocytosis. Sheep housed with infected camels

showed variable clinical signs including fever, depression, coughing, nasal and lacrimal discharges, and diarrhea. Two sheep (IV S 1, 4) died at days 4-7 after housing with infected camels.

### Goats housed with dromedary camels infected with PPR-positive camel lung homogenate (IV-b-G)

All infected camels showed mild rise in temperature and leukocytosis (13900-5800 cells/µL). Goats housed with infected camels showed similar clinical signs observed in sheep. These symptoms disappeared on day 16-17 after housing with infected camels and there was no mortality.

### PM findings

The camels, sheep and goats were euthanized on the day 21 pi. The postmortem findings for euthanized and dead animals were congestion in liver and intestine, pneumonia in lung and enlargement of mesenteric lymph nodes.

### Detection of PPR antigen in tissue samples using Ic-ELISA

Four out of five infected camels (IV D 1, 2, 4, 5), 3 out of 5 in-contact sheep (IV S 1, 4, 5) and 3 out of the 5 in-contact goats (IV G 1, 2, 3) were found positive for PPR antigen using Ic-ELISA (Table 2).

### Detection of PPR genome using RT-PCR

Some of PPR Ic-ELISA positive samples (n = 12 lung samples; 7 camels, 3 sheep and 2 goats) were selected for PPRV genome detection using QIAGEN One step RT/PCR Kit and PPRV-specific primers. All the samples tested positive for PPR genome (data not shown).

### Detection of PPR antibodies using c-ELISA

Sera were collected from all camels, sheep and goats 21 days after the experiments and tested for PPR antibodies. Only sheep and goat sera were found positive.

### Discussion

The advantage of doing transmission experiments compared to field studies is that they offer a controlled environment in which the effect of a single factor can be investigated, while variation due to other factors is minimized [22]. Evidence of clinical PPRV infection in camels and seroconversion are continuously being reported from endemic regions in Africa, the Middle East and Asia [23]. In this work, we explored the possible role of camels in the transmission of PPR. We carried out four experiments to infect sheep, goats and
camels with PPRV originating from camel and sheep. Experimental infections produce clinical signs which are specific for PPR disease [24-25] and are comparable to naturally infections [5,25-27]. Host responses are reflected by initial leukopenia followed by leukocytosis. Similar observation has been recorded by other authors [28-29]. The postmortem lesions seen in sheep and goats in the four experiments matched with the classical lesions caused by the virus previously reported in naturally as well as experimentally infected sheep and goats [30-33]. Antibodies against PPR were detected in all sheep and goats used in the four experiments with elevating titres in the three weeks, representing strong positive reaction. Interestingly, all camel sera in this study, collected till the end of the experiments, tested negative for PPR antibodies. This is contradictory to the antigen detection results which could be explained by the unusual nature of camel antibodies previously reported [34]. We noticed the same during the massive PPR outbreak in camels in 2004 [16]. In most of the previous reports, antibodies to PPR in camels were either detected in low levels [12,14,15,35-37] or it was not detected [38-41]. In this study, camels were however confirmed to be susceptible and able to replicate the virus as demonstrated, whether by inoculation or by in contact experiments. Since this study, the standard operating procedure of the c-ELISA kit that was originally validated for sheep and goats was modified to detect antibodies directed against the PPRV nucleoprotein in camelid serum or plasma, thus improving sensitivity of the kit to camel species. The test is commercialised by Innovative Diagnostics (IDVet, Grabels, France) and uses technology developed by CIRAD, Montpellier, France. Therefore, we highly recommend testing and validating the currently available ELISA kits for the detection of PPRV specific antibodies in atypical hosts, especially the camels.

Throughout the four experiments, artificially infected camels showed mild clinical signs and remained apparently healthy. There was slight rise in temperature and evidence of immune reactions based on the decrease in total WBCs count followed by marked increase, indicating that PPRV in experimental trials does not cause disease in dromedary camels but induces a low level of virus replication that is still detectable at 21 pi as demonstrated by the detection of PPR antigen in tissue samples using Ic-ELISA and confirmation by RT/PCR.

This result corroborates previous findings demonstrating that experimental infection of dromedary camels with PPRV does not produce

apparent clinical signs. The only experimental infection that resulted in mild respiratory disease with coughing, nasal discharge and fever was reported by Harrak *et al.* [28]. Wernery experimentally infected camels with PPRV and reported the failure to produce clinical signs [42]. Fakhri *et al.* observed no clinical infection of PPR in camels after experimental exposure and claimed that camels play no epidemiological role in the spread of the disease [43]. Recently, Schulz [44] showed that camelids including the dromedary camels developed no clinical signs, no viremia, shed no or low PPRV-RNA loads in swab samples and did not transmit any PPRV to the contact animals when experimentally infected with the virulent PPRV lineage IV (LIV)-strain Kurdistan/2011. It is concluded that PPRV causes subclinical infection in dromedary camels without apparent PPR clinical symptoms. The slight variations in the magnitude of the pathology induced by the virus could be related to the strain of the virus used as an inoculum, dosage, or the route of inoculation. However, more research is needed to determine the role played by these factors.

The most critical elements in the infection of dromedary camels with PPR are virus shedding and the transmissibility to the typical host such as sheep and goats. In the present study, we demonstrated severe clinical disease in sheep and goats housed with dromedary camels infected with PPRV prepared from camel lungs pointing to virus shedding from infected camels. Additionally, camels infected with PPRV from sheep can transmit the disease back to sheep.

These results contradict the recent findings by Schulz *et al.* who found that camels did not transmit any PPRV to the contact animals when experimentally infected with the virulent PPRV [44]. The failure of the dromedary camels experimentally infected with PPRV in the experiments by Schulz *et al.* could be related to the biological properties of the strain PPRV lineage IV (LIV)-strain Kurdistan/2011 primarily isolated in northern Iraq where there was no incidence of camel infection with PPRV or the breed of camels involved [44]. In a similar situation, Nawathe and Taylor previously performed an experimental investigation that revealed a subclinical infection of PPRV in pigs with no shedding and transmission of the virus to goats [45]. Later, Schulz *et al.* performed transmission trials with the same virus strain used in the above camel experiment (PPRV lineage IV (LIV)-strain Kurdistan/2011) and revealed that pigs and wild boar are possible sources of PPRV-infection to goats [46].

Sequence analysis of PPRV isolates obtained from camels and other atypical hosts with emphasis on the
glycoprotein HN gene, which is necessary for the virus attachment to and entry into the cells is expected to shed light on potential mutations that enable the virus to infect animal species other than small ruminants.

Contrary to the outcome of experimental infection of PPRV in dromedary camels which show subclinical disease, outbreaks of PPR in camels have been reported from four camel-raising countries (Ethiopia, Iran, Kenya and Sudan). Stress conditions in the field such as seasonal movement in search for green pasture coinciding with severe PPR in the comingling sheep flocks [16] could contribute to the appearance of the disease in camels. Interestingly, no further disease outbreaks were reported from Sudan, despite abattoir studies on slaughtered camels have reported detection of PPRV antigens in lung tissue with gross lesions, indicating a history of pneumonia [21,47,48]. Therefore, it is possible that after the primary severe outbreaks an endemic situation develops characterized by subclinical infection as animals build up immunity that can minimize the symptoms during further attacks of the virus [49].

The most significant finding presented in this work is that camels can develop subclinical infection by PPRV and can transmit it to sheep and goats. In agreement with the conclusion of Rahman *et al*. [21] that camels do not appear to be a dead-end host, the virus transmissibility between sheep, goats and camels needs to be considered when designing control measures for PPR.

## Conclusions

This study provides unequivocal evidence of PPRV transmission from sub-clinically affected camels to in-contact sheep and goats highlighting the neglected role of the camels in transmitting this economically important disease.

## Acknowledgements

Part of this work was funded by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) through Research Grant No. 14583 to the first author; this support is very much appreciated.

## Authors' Contributions

IKS, GL, AD, YHA designed and supervised the study. IKS, MAH, SMA, SMM, BAM, KMT performed the experiments and lab work. YHA, AIK drafted the manuscript. IKS analyzed and interpreted the data. GL, AD, AIK revised and approved the manuscript.

## References

1. Parida S, Muniraju M, Mahapatra M, Muthuchelvan D, Buczkowski H, Banyard AC (2015) Peste des petits ruminants. Vet Microbiol 181: 90-106.

2. Anees M, Shabbir MZ, Muhammad K, Nazir J, Shabbir MA, Wensman JJ, Munir M (2013) Genetic analysis of peste des petits ruminants virus from Pakistan. BMC Vet Res 9: 60.

3. Shabbir MZ, Ul-Rahman A, Zahid MN, Munir M (2018) Genetic characterization of small ruminant morbillivirus from recently emerging wave of outbreaks in Pakistan. Transbound Emerg Dis 65: 2032-2038.

4. Abubakar M, Manzoor S, Wensman JJ, Torsson E, Qurban A, Munir M (2016) Molecular and epidemiological features of Peste des petits ruminants outbreak during endemic situation. Hosts and Viruses 3: 123-129.

5. Islam MS, Khan SI, Kader HA, Begum MR, Asgar MA (2012) Prevalence of PPR of goat and their response to antibiotic treatment at Mirzaganj Upazila of Patuakhali District. J Environ Sci Natural Resources 5: 181-184.

6. Chauhan HC, Kher HN, Rajak KK, Sen A, Dadawala AI, Chandel BS (2014) Epidemiology and diagnosis of peste des petits ruminants in sheep and goats by serological, molecular and isolation methods in Gujarat. India. Adv Anim Vet Sci 2: 192-198.

7. Nargesi I, Kolveiri MP, Maghsoudi O (2012) Survey on peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in small ruminants. Ann Biol Res 3: 4842-4844.

8. Wang Z, Bao J, Wu X, Liu Y, Li L, Liu C, Xie Z, Zhao W, Zhang W, Yang N, Li J, Wang S, Wang J (2009) Peste des petits ruminants virus in Tibet, China. Emerg Infect Dis 15: 299-301.

9. Gao X, Liu T, Zheng K, Xiao J, Wang H (2019) Spatio-temporal analysis of peste des petits ruminants outbreaks in PR China (2013-2018): Updates based on the newest data. Transbound Emerg Dis 66: 2163-2170.

10. Ismail TM, Hassan HB, Nawal MA, Rakha GM, Abd El-Halim MM, Fatebia MM (1992) Studies on prevalence of rinderpest and peste des petits ruminants antibodies in camel sera in Egypt. Vet Med J Giza 10: 49-53.

11. Roger F, Yigezu LM, Hurard C, Libeau G, Mebratu GY, Diallo A, Faye B (2000) Investigations on a new pathological condition of camels in Ethiopia. J Camel Pract Res 7: 163-165.

12. Roger F, Guebre YM, Libeau G, Diallo A, Yigezu LM, Yilma T (2001) Detection of antibodies of rinderpest and peste des petits ruminants viruses (Paramyxoviridae, Morbillivirus) during a new epizootic disease in Ethiopian camels (Camelus dromedarius). Revue Méd Vét 152: 265-268.

13. El Amin MAG, Hassan AM (1999) Rinderpest and PPR surveillance in Sudan (1996-1998). In: The seromonitoring and surveillance of rinderpest throughout Africa—Phase III. Results for 1998. Proceedings of a research co-ordination meeting of the FAO/IAEA/OAU/IBAR/PARC coordinated research project organized by the joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Machakos, Kenya, 26-30 April 1999. Vienna, Austria: IAEA/FAO.

14. Haroun M, Hajer I, Mukhtar M, Ali BE (2002) Detection of antibodies against peste des petits ruminants virus in sera of cattle, camels, sheep and goats in Sudan. Vet Res Commun 26: 537-541.

15. Intisar KS, Ali YH, Khalafalla AI, Mahasin EA/Rahman (2010) Current situation of Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in the Sudan. Trop Anim Hlth Prod 4: 89-93.
16. Khalafalla AI, Saeed IK, Ali YH, Abdurrahman MB, Kwiatek O, Libeau G, Obeida AA, Abbas Z (2010) An outbreak of peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in camels in the Sudan. Act Trop 116: 161-165.

17. Kwiatek O, Ali YH, Saeed IK, Khalafalla AI, Mohamed OI, Obeida AA, Abdelrahman MB, Osman HM, Taha KM, Abbas Z, El Harrak M, Lhor Y, Diallo A, Lancelot R, Albina E, Libeau G (2011) Asian lineage of peste des petits ruminants virus, Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 1223-31.

18. Zakian A, Nouri M, Kahroba H, Mohammadian B, Mokhber-Dezfouli MR (2016) The first report of peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Iran. Trop Anim Health Prod 48: 1215-1219.

19. Omani RN, Gitao GC, Gachohi J, Gathumbi PK, BA, Abbey K, Chemweno VJ (2019) Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in dromedary camels and small ruminants in Mandera and Wajir counties of Kenya. Adv Virol 4028720.

20. Libeau G, Préhaud C, Lancelot R, Colas F, Guerre L, Bishop DH, Diallo A (1995) Development of a competitive ELISA for detecting antibodies to the peste des petits ruminants virus using a recombinant nucleoprotein. Res Vet Sci 58: 50-55.

21. Couacy-Hymann E, Roger F, Hurard C, Guillo JP, Libeau G, Diallo A (2002) Rapid and sensitive detection of peste des petits ruminants virus by a polymerase chain reaction assay. J Virol Methods 100: 17-25.

22. Velthuis AG, Bouma A, Katsma WE, Nodelijk G, De Jong MC (2007) Design and analysis of small-scale transmission experiments with animals. *Epidemiol. Infect* 135: 202–217.

23. Rahman AU, Dhama K, Ali Q, Hussain I, Oneeb M, Chaudhary U, Wensman JJ, Shabbir MZ (2020) Peste des petits ruminants in large ruminants, camels and unusual hosts. Vet Q 4: 35-42.

24. Emikpe BO, Sabri MY, Akpavie SO, Zamri-Saad M (2010) Experimental infection of peste des petit ruminant virus and Mannheimia haemolytica A2 in goats: immune localization of Mannheimia haemolytica antigens, Vet Res Commun 34: 569–578.

25. Truong T, Boshra H, Embury-Hyatt C, Nfon C, Gerdts V, Tikoo S, Babiuk LA, Pravesh P, Chetty T, Mather A, Wallace DB, Babiuk S (2014) Peste des petits ruminants virus tissue tropism and pathogenesis in sheep and goats following experimental infection. PLoS ONE 9: e87145.

26. Nwoha RIO, Omamegbe JO, Nwakundu NO (2013) Clinico-pathological findings in West African dwarf goats with peste des petits ruminants infection. Philipp J Vet Anim Sci 39: 125-132.

27. Tanwar VK (2013) An outbreak of peste des petits ruminants in a goat flock. Haryana Veterinarian 52: 143.

28. El Harrak M, Touil N, Loutfi C, Hammouchi M, Parida S, Sebbar G, Chaffai N, Harif B, Messoudi N, Batten C, Ourac CAL (2012) A reliable and reproducible experimental challenge model for peste des petits ruminants virus. J Clin Microbiol 50: 3738-3740.

29. Pope RA, Parida S, Bailey D, Brownlie J, Barrett T, Banyard AC (2013) Early events following experimental infection with peste-des-petits ruminants virus suggest immune cell targeting. PLoS ONE 8: e55830.

30. Kataria AK, Kataria N, Gahlot AK (2007) Large scale outbreaks of peste des petits ruminants in sheep and goats in Thar desert of India. Slov Vet Res 44: 123-132.

31. Das KK, Shil NK, Rafiqul Islam MR (2007) Seroprevalence of PPR in dromedary camels in Sudan. Trop Anim Health Prod 47: 995-998.

32. Al-Naeem A, Abu-Elzein E, Abdelsalam E, Al-Hizab F, Housawi F, AL-Afaleq A (2009) Clinico-pathological response of indigenous sheep & goats to a virulent gazelle peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV). Sci J King Faisal Univ (Basic and Applied Sciences) 10: 1430 181-189.

33. World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) (2013) Chapter 2.7.11: Peste des Petits ruminants. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Available: https://rr-africa.oie.int/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2-07-11_ppr.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2018.

34. Daley LP, Kutzler MA, Bennet BW, Smith MC, Glaser AL, Appleton JA (2010) Effector functions of camelid heavy-chain antibodies in immunity to West Nile virus. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17: 239-246.

35. Abraham G, Sintayehu A, Libeau G, Albina E, Roger F, Laekemariam Y (2005) Antibody seroprevalences against Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) virus in camels, cattle, goats and sheep in Ethiopia. Prev Vet Med 70: 51–57.

36. Swai ES, Moshy W, Mbise E, Kaaya J, Bwanga S (2011) Serological evidence of camel exposure to peste des petits ruminants virus in Tanzania. Res Opin Anim Vet Sci 1: 325-329.

37. Woma TY, Kalla DJ, Ekong PS, Ularamu HG, Chollom SC, Lamurde II, Bajehson DB, Tom ND, Aaron GB, Shamaki D, Bailey D, Diallo A, Quan M (2015) Serological evidence of camel exposure to peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) in Nigeria. Trop Anim Health Prod 47: 603–606.

38. Ibu OJ, Salihu SAE, Luther JN, Suraj K, Ceaser A, Abechi AS, AbaAbdulugba EP, Shamaki D (2008) Evaluation of peste des petits ruminants and rinderpest virus infections of camels in Borno and Kano States of Nigeria. Nig Vet J 29: 76-77.

39. El-Yuguda A, Chabiri L, Adamu F, Baba S (2010) Peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) infection among small ruminants slaughtered at the central abattoir, Maiduguri, Nigeria. Sahel J Vet Scie 8: 93-96.

40. Bidjeh K, Ban-Bo BA, Mahamat FA, Assandi O, Assante K, Tchari D, Keilar A, Taitouin S (2015). Distribution and seroprevalence of PPR virus in Chad during 2004 - 2014. Anim Vet Sci 3: 89-93.

41. Mahmoud AZ, Abdellatif M, Shazali L (2016) Prevalence of PPR-virus antibodies in sheep, goats and camels in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Br J Virol 3: 86-89.

42. Wernery U (2011) Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in camelids with own investigation. J Camel Pract Res 18: 219-223.

43. Fakri FZ, Bamouh Z, Jazouli M, Tadlaoui KO, Elharrak M (2019) Experimental infection of dromedary camels with virulent virus of Peste des Petits Ruminants. Vet Microbiol 235: 195-198.

44. Schulz C, Fast C, Wernery U, Kinne J, Joseph S, Schlottau K, Jenckel M, Höper D, Patteril NAG, Syriac G, Hoffmann B, Beer M (2019) Camelids and cattle are dead-end hosts for peste-des-petits-ruminants Virus. *Viruses* 11: 1133.

45. Nawathe DR, Taylor WP (1979) Experimental infection of domestic pigs with the virus of peste des petits ruminants. Trop Anim Health Prod 11: 120-122.

46. Schulz C, Fast C, Schlottau K, Hoffmann B, Beer M (2018) Neglected hosts of small ruminant morbillivirus. Emerg Infect Dis 24: 2334-2337.

47. Saeed IK, Ali YH, AbdulRahman MB, Mohammed ZA, Osman HM, Taha KM, Musa MZ., Khalafalla AI (2015) Mixed infection of peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) and other respiratory viruses in dromedary camels in Sudan, an abattoir study. Trop Anim Health Prod 47: 995-998.
48. Intisar KS, Ali YH, Haj MA, Sahar MA, Shaza MM, Baraa AM, Ishag OM, Nouri YM, Taha KM, Nada EM, Ahmed AM (2017) Peste des petits ruminants infection in domestic ruminants in Sudan. Trop Anim Health Prod 49: 747-754.

49. Banyard AC, Parida S, Batten C, Oura C, Kwiatek O, Libeau G (2010) Global distribution of peste des petits ruminants virus and prospects for improved diagnosis and control. J Gen Virol 91: 2885-2897.

**Corresponding author**

Abdelmalik Ibrahim Khalafalla, Ph.D.
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
University of Khartoum,
Shambat, 13314 Khartoum North, Sudan.
Tel: +249133255599
Email: abdokhlf@yahoo.co.uk

**Conflict of interests:** No conflict of interests is declared.