138. Paulsen MB. College Choice: Understanding Student Enrollment Behavior. ERIC; 1990.

139. Singer TS, Hughey AW. The role of the alumni association in student life. New Dir Student Serv. 2002; 2002: 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.70

140. Gajić J. Importance of Marketing Mix in Higher Education Institutions. Singidunum J. 2012; 9: 29–41.

141. Micari M, Pazos P. Connecting to the Professor: Impact of the Student–Faculty Relationship in a Highly Challenging Course. Coll Teach. 2012; 60: 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.627576

142. Dawes PL, Brown J. Determinants of Awareness, Consideration, and Choice Set Size in University Choice. J Mark High Educ. 2002; 12: 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v12n01

143. Gibbs P, Knapp M. Marketing higher and further education: An educator's guide to promoting courses, departments and institutions. Routledge; 2012.

144. Armstrong JJ, Lumsden DB. Impact of Universities' Promotional Materials on College Choice. J Mark High Educ. 2000; 9: 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v09n02

145. Ivy J. University image: the role of marketing in MBA student recruitment in state subsidised universities in the Republic of South Africa. Unpubl Dr Diss Univ Leicester, Leicester. 2002.

146. Bennet D. The effectiveness of current student ambassadors in HE marketing recruitment and retention. International Conference on HE marketing Cyprus. 2006. pp. 3–5.

147. Yamamoto GT. University evaluation-selection: a Turkish case. Int J Educ Manag. 2006.

148. Gajić J, Živković R, Stanić N. KEY ATTRIBUTES OF SUCCESSFUL COMMUNICATION BETWEEN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION AND PROSPECTIVE STUDENTS. TEME Cas za Društvene Nauk. 2017; 41.

149. Bodycott P. Choosing a higher education study abroad destination: What mainland Chinese parents and students rate as important. J Res Int Educ. 2009; 8: 349–373.

150. Goff B, Patino V, Jackson G. Preferred information sources of high school students for community colleges and universities. Community Coll J Res Pract. 2004; 28: 795–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920390276957

151. Berge M, Silfver E, Danielsson A. In search of the new engineer: gender, age, and social class in information about engineering education. Eur J Eng Educ. 2019; 44: 650–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1523133

152. Kotler P, Hayes T, Bloom PN. Marketing professional services. Prentice Hall; 2002.

153. Simões C, Soares AM. Applying to higher education: Information sources and choice factors. Stud High Educ. 2010; 35: 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903096490

154. Briggs S, Wilson A. Which university? A study of the influence of cost and information factors on Scottish undergraduate choice. J High Educ Policy Manag. 2007; 29: 57–72.

155. Tarafdar M, Zhang J. Analysis of critical website characteristics: a cross-category study of successful websites. J Comput Inf Syst. 2005; 46: 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2006.11645879

156. Ferry TR, Fouad NA, Smith PL. The Role of Family Context in a Social Cognitive Model for Career-Related Choice Behavior: A Math and Science Perspective. J Vocat Behav. 2000; 57: 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1743

157. Chauhan K, Pillai A. Role of content strategy in social media brand communities: a case of higher education institutes in India. J Prod Brand Manag. 2013; 22: 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421311298687

158. Turner ML. Like, Love, Delete: Social Media's Influence on College Choice. J Coll Admiss. 2017; 237: 31–33.

159. Kowalik E. Engaging alumni and prospective students through social media. Cutting-Edge Technologies in Higher Education. Emerald; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2011)0000002014

160. Chugh R, Ruhi U. Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Educ Inf Technol. 2018; 23: 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9621-2

161. Murphy G, Salomone S. Using social media to facilitate knowledge transfer in complex engineering environments: A primer for educators. Eur J Eng Educ. 2013; 38: 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.742871

162. Rutter R, Roper S, Lettice F. Social media interaction, the university brand and recruitment performance. J Bus Res. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.025

163. Hossler D, Bontrager B. Handbook of strategic enrollment management. John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

164. Yamamoto GT. University evaluation-selection: A Turkish case. Int J Educ Manag. 2006; 20: 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610704654
165. Mahajan P, Golahit S. Service marketing mix as input and output of higher and technical education: A measurement model based on students' perceived experience. J Appl Res High Educ. 2019; 12: 151-193. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2019-0022

166. Rafiq M, Ahmed PK. Using the 7Ps as a generic marketing mix. Mark Intell Plan. 1995; 13: 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634509510097793

167. Gajic J. Importance of Marketing Mix. J Appl Sci. 2012; 9: 29-41.

168. Lim WM, Jee TW, De Run EC. Strategic brand management for higher education institutions with graduate degree programs: empirical insights from the higher education marketing mix. J Strateg Mark. 2018; 00: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2018.1496131

169. Griffith AL, Rothstein DS. Can't get there from here: The decision to apply to a selective college. Econ Educ Rev. 2009; 28: 620-628.

170. Turley RNL. College proximity: Mapping access to opportunity. Sociol Educ. 2009; 82: 126-146.

171. Sanders J. Gender and technology in education: A research review. Seattle Cent Gend Equity Bibliogr retrieved March. 2005; 20: 2006.

172. Frenette M. Too far to go on? Distance to school and university participation. Education Economics. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290500481865

173. López Turley RN. College proximity: Mapping access to opportunity. Sociol Educ. 2009; 82: 126-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070908200202

174. Winter E, Thompson-Whiteside H. Location, location, location: does place provide the opportunity for differentiation for universities? J Mark High Educ. 2017; 27. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2017.1377798

175. Bitner MJ. Using Background Music to Affect the Behaviour of Supermarket Shoppers. J Mark. 1992; 56: 57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252042

176. Joseph M, Yakhou M, Stone G. An educational institution's quest for service quality: Customers' perspective. Qual Assur Educ. 2005; 13: 66-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510578669

177. Ebell MH, Bierema L, Haines L. Graduate students significantly more concerned than undergraduates about returning to campus in the era of COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020; 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.15.20154682

178. Mahajan R, Agrawal R, Sharma V, Nangia V. Factors affecting quality of management education in India: An interpretive structural modelling approach. Int J Educ Manag. 2014; 28: 379-399. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2012-0115

179. Weisser RA. How Personality Shapes Study Location Choices. Res High Educ. 2020; 61: 88-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09550-2

180. Hannagan T. Marketing for the Non-profit Sector. Macmillan Press Ltd.; 1992.

181. Kotler P, Fox KFA. Strategic marketing for educational institutions. Prentice Hall; 1995.

182. Chanana K. Treading the Hallowed Halls: Women in Higher Education in India. Econ Polit Wkly. 2000; 35: 1012-1022. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4409055.

183. Ho GKS, Law R. Marketing Strategies in the Decision-Making Process for Undergraduate Choice in Pursuit of Hospitality and Tourism Higher Education: The Case of Hong Kong. J Hosp Tour Educ. 2020; 00: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2020.1791136

184. Imenda SN, Kongolo M, Grewal AS. Factors Underlying Technikon and University Enrolment Trends in South Africa. Educ Manag Adm Leadersh. 2004; 32: 195-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143204041884

185. Briggs S. An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: The case of higher education in Scotland. Stud High Educ. 2006; 31: 705-722. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601004333

186. Lafuente-Ruiz-de-Sabando A, Zorrilla P, Forcada J. A review of higher education image and reputation literature: Knowledge gaps and a research agenda. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.06.005

187. Wadhwa R. Students on Move: Understanding Decision-making Process and Destination Choice of Indian Students. High Educ Futur. 2016; 3: 54-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631115610221

188. Lafuente-Ruiz-de-Sabando A, Zorrilla P, Forcada J. A review of higher education image and reputation literature: Knowledge gaps and a research agenda. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ. 2018; 24: 8-16.

189. Hemsley-Brown J, Oplatka I. University choice: What do we know, what don't we know and what do we still need to find out? Int J Educ Manag. 2015; 29: 254-274. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2013-0150
190. Maringe F. University and course choice. Int J Educ Manag. 2006; 20: 466-479. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610683711

191. Soutar GN, Turner JP. Students' preferences for university: a conjoint analysis. Int J Educ Manag. 2002; 16: 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540210415523

192. Lau MMY. Effects of 8Ps of services marketing on student selection of self-financing sub-degree programmes in Hong Kong. Int J Educ Manag. 2016.

193. Mazzarol T, Soutar GN. "Push-pull" factors influencing international student destination choice. Int J Educ Manag. 2002; 16: 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540210418403

194. Skinner BT. Choosing College in the 2000s: An Updated Analysis Using the Conditional Logistic Choice Model. Research in Higher Education. Springer Netherlands; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9507-1

195. Magnell M, Geschwind L, Kolmos A. Faculty perspectives on the inclusion of work-related learning in engineering curricula. Eur J Eng Educ. 2017; 42: 1038-1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1250067

196. Woolnough BE. Factors affecting students' choice of science and engineering. Int J Sci Educ. 1994; 16: 659-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069940160605

197. De Courcy JW. The Quality of Realisation. Eur J Eng Educ. 1987; 12: 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043798708939363

198. Voss R, Gruber T, Szmigin I. Service quality in higher education: The role of student expectations. J Bus Res. 2007; 60: 949-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.020

199. Bhattacharya B. What is "good teaching" in engineering education in India? A case study. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2004; 41: 329-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290410001733258

200. Saunders-Smits G, de Graaff E. Assessment of curriculum quality through alumni research. Eur J Eng Educ. 2012; 37: 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.665847

201. Ho H, Hung C. Marketing mix formulation for higher education: An integrated analysis employing analytical hierarchy process, cluster analysis and correspondence analysis. Int J Educ Manag. 2008; 22: 328-340. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540810875662

202. Palmer A, Koenig-Lewis N, Asaad Y. Brand identification in higher education: A conditional process analysis. J Bus Res. 2016; 69: 3033-3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.018

203. Pucciarelli F, Kaplan A. Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Bus Horiz. 2016; 59: 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.003.

204. Baytiyeh H, Naja M. Identifying the challenging factors in the transition from colleges of engineering to employment. Eur J Eng Educ. 2012; 37: 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2011.644761

205. Malgwi CA, Howe MA, Burnaby PA. Influences on Students' Choice of College Major. J Educ Bus. 2005; 80: 275-282. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.80.5.275-282

206. Thompson DA, Dent HL, Fine MB. Factors related to a college student's career optimism and their perception of career services. High Educ Q. 2022; 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12408

207. Markes I. A review of literature on employability skill needs in engineering. Eur J Eng Educ. 2006; 31: 637-650. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790600911704

208. Kallio RE. Factors influencing the college choice decisions of graduate students. Res High Educ. 1995; 36: 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207769

209. Mourad M. Role of brand related factors in influencing students' choice in Higher Education (HE) market. Int J Manag Educ. 2011; 5: 258. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2011.039488

210. McCarthy EE, Sen AK, Fox Garrity B. Factors that influence Canadian students' choice of higher education institutions in the United States. Bus Educ Accred. 2012; 4: 85-95.

211. Pandi AP, Sethupathi PVR, Jeyathilagar D. IEQMS model: a leveraging mechanism to polarise quality in engineering educational institutions—an empirical study. Int J Manuf Technol Manag. 2014; 28: 257. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2014.066703

212. Sakthivel PB, Raju R. An Instrument for Measuring Engineering Education Quality from Students' Perspective. 2006; 6967. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2006.11918559.

213. Jain R, Sahney S, Sinha G. Developing a scale to measure students' perception of service quality in the Indian context. TQM J. 2013; 25: 276-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731311307456

214. Owlia MS, Aspinwall EM. A framework for measuring quality in engineering education. Total Qual Manag. 1998; 9: 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412988433

215. Izquierdo FA. Quality-designed curricula. Eur J Eng Educ. 1993; 18: 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799308923253
216. Trum H. Aspects of quality in Continuing Engineering Education. Int J Contin Eng Educ Life-Long Learn. 1992; 2: 1–13. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0026706012&partnerID=40&md5=126ad928a31ed911b4aad32650fdde2d.

217. Sayeda B, Rajendran C, Sai Lokachari P. An empirical study of total quality management in engineering educational institutions of India. Benchmarking An Int J. 2010; 17: 728–767. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771011076461

218. Gambhir V, Wadhwa NC, Grover S. Interpretive structural modelling of enablers of quality technical education: an Indian perspective. Int J Product Qual Manag. 2013; 12: 393. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2013.056734

219. Viswanadhan KG. Quality indicators of engineering education programmes: a multi-criteria analysis from India. Int J Ind Syst Eng. 2009; 4: 270–282.

220. Natarajan R. Assessment of engineering education quality: an Indian perspective. Engineering Education Quality Assurance. Springer; 2009. pp. 145–151.

221. Horstschräer J. University rankings in action? The importance of rankings and an excellence competition for university choice of high-ability students. Econ Educ Rev. 2012; 31: 1162–1176.

222. Abdullah F. The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. Int J Consum Stud. 2006; 30: 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x

223. Sun LB, Qu H. Is there any gender effect on the relationship between service quality and word-of-mouth? J Travel Tour Mark. 2011; 28: 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2011.546215

224. Nyaribo M, Prakash A, Edward O. Motivators of choosing a management course: A comparative study of kenya and india. Int J Manag Educ. 2012; 10: 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2012.08.001

225. Sahu AR, Shrivastava RR, Shrivastava RL. Critical success factors for sustainable improvement in technical education excellence. TQM J. 2013; 25: 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731311286432

226. Price IF, Matzdorf F, Smith L, Agahi H. The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities. 2003.

227. Raj DMA, Raguraman M, Veerappan R. Marketing of educational services: A new strategy for customer satisfaction. Int J Sci Res Manag. 2013; 1: 435–440.

228. Palmer A. The marketing of services. Mark B. 2003; 585.

229. Ai X, Chen C, Xu B, Zhang M, Liu Z, Fu G. A survey of college students' safety awareness. J Secur Saf Technol. 2018; 6: 84–91.

230. Elliott KM, Healy M A. Key Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction Related to Recruitment and Retention Key Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction Related to Recruitment and Retention. J Mark High Educ. 2001; 10: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v10n04

231. Peters J. Designing Inclusion Into Engineering Education: A Fresh, Practical Look at how Diversity Impacts on Engineering and Strategies for Change. Royal Academy of Engineering; 2018.

232. Sakthivel PB, Raju R. Conceptualizing total quality management in engineering education and developing a TQM educational excellence model. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 2006; 17: 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360600595476

233. Lim WM. A marketing mix typology for integrated care: the 10 Ps. J Strateg Mark. 2021; 29: 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2020.1775683

234. Berjano E, Sales-Nebot L, Lozano-Nieto A. Improving professionalism in the engineering curriculum through a novel use of oral presentations. Eur J Eng Educ. 2013; 38: 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.745829

235. Mitchell JE, Nyamapfene A, Roach K, Tilley E. Faculty wide curriculum reform: the integrated engineering programme. Eur J Eng Educ. 2019; 0: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1593324

236. FutureSkills Prime. Reimagining STEM Education—Student Survey 2021. NASSCOM. 2021. Available: https://nasscom.in/knowledge-center/publications/reimagining-stem-education-student-survey-2021.

237. Shay S. Curriculum in higher education: Beyond false choices. Thinking about higher education. Springer; 2014. pp. 139–155.

238. Stentiford L, Koutsouris G. Critically considering the 'inclusive curriculum' in higher education. Br J Sociol Educ. 2022; 43: 1250–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122937

239. Goi C, Ng PY. E-learning in Malaysia: Success factors in implementing e-learning program. Int J Teach Learn High Educ. 2008; 20.

240. Lim LL, Zailani SHM. Determinants influencing intention to enrol on an online MBA programme. Int J Bus Inf Syst. 2012; 9: 51–88. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2012.044455
241. Macleod J, Kyriakidis S, Kefallonitis E, Kavoura A. Strategic innovative communication tools in higher education. Strategic Innovative Marketing. Springer; 2017. pp. 759–764.

242. Gautam DK, Gautam PK. Transition to online higher education during COVID-19 pandemic: turmoil and way forward to developing country of South Asia-Nepal. J Res Innov Teach Learn. 2021; 14: 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2020-0051

243. Asgari S, Trajkovic J, Rahmani M, Zhang W, Lo RC, Sciortino A. An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2021; 16: e0250041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250041 PMID: 33857219

244. Zia A. Exploring factors influencing online classes due to social distancing in COVID-19 pandemic: a business students perspective. Int J Inf Learn Technol. 2020; 37: 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-05-2020-0089

245. Rashid S, Yadav SS. Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Higher Education and Research. Indian J Hum Dev. 2020; 14: 340–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020946700

246. Condie R, Livingston K. Blending online learning with traditional approaches: changing practices. Br J Educ Technol. 2007; 38: 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00630.x.

247. Walkington J. A process for curriculum change in engineering education. Eur J Eng Educ. 2002; 27: 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790210129603

248. Hemmo V, Love P. Encouraging student interest in science and technology studies. OECD Publishing; 2008.

249. Stange K. Differential pricing in undergraduate education: Effects on degree production by field. J Policy Anal Manag. 2015; 34: 107–135.

250. Long BT. How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. J Econom. 2004; 121: 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.004

251. Singh N. Higher Education for Women in India—Choices and Challenges. Forum on Public Policy Online. 2007; 2007: 1–16.

252. Ivy J. A new higher education marketing mix: the 7Ps for MBA marketing. Int J Educ Manag. 2008; 22: 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540810875635

253. Ivy J. A new higher education marketing mix: the 7Ps for MBA marketing. Int J Educ Manag. 2008; 22: 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540810875635

254. Yoon H. An online college near me: Exploring the institutional factors of e-learners' local orientation. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2019; 20: 64–84. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4432

255. Kotler P, Fox K. Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions Prentice Hall. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ. 1985.

256. Wu F, Fan W, Arbona C, de la Rosa-Pohl D. Self-efficacy and subjective task values in relation to choice, effort, persistence, and continuation in engineering: an Expectancy-value theory perspective. Eur J Eng Educ. 2020; 45: 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1659231

257. Foskett N, Hemsley-Brown J. Choosing futures: Young people's decision-making in education, training, and careers markets. Psychology Press; 2001.

258. Maringe F, Gibbs P. Marketing Higher Education: Theory and Practice. McGraw-Hill House; 2009. Available: http://www.theeuropeanlibrary.org/tel4/record/2000007404839.

259. Holdsworth DK, Nind D. Choice modeling New Zealand high school seniors' preferences for university education. J Mark High Educ. 2006; 15: 81–102.

260. DesJardins SL, Toutkoushian RK. Are students really rational? The development of rational thought and its application to student choice. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. Springer; 2005. pp. 191–240.

261. Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O'Neill N, Khan M, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, et al. World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg. 2020; 76: 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034 PMID: 32112977

262. Ciotti M, Ciccozzi M, Terrinoni A, Jiang WC, Wang C Bin, Bernardini S. The COVID-19 pandemic. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020; 57: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2020.1783198 PMID: 32645276

263. Rosenthal GT, Boudreaux M, Boudreaux DL, Soignier RD, Folse E, Frias T, et al. The Student Storm Survey©: College Students' Thoughts on Their University's Response to a Natural Disaster. J Acad Adm High Educ. 2014; 10: 19–26.

264. Gautam DK, Gautam PK. Transition to Online Higher Education during COVID-19 Pandemic: Turmoil and Way Forward to Developing Country-Nepal. Res Sq. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2020-0051

265. Adedoyin OB, Soykan E. Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interact Learn Environ. 2020; 0: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
266. Settersten RA, Bernardi L, Härkönen J, Antonucci TC, Dykstra PA, Heckhausen J, et al. Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens. Adv Life Course Res. 2020; 45: 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100360 PMID: 36698274

267. Hasan N, Khan NH. ONLINE TEACHING-LEARNING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: STUDENTS '2020.

268. Liguori E, Winkler C. From Offline to Online: Challenges and Opportunities for Entrepreneurship Education Following the COVID-19 Pandemic. Entrep Educ Pedagog. 2020; 3: 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127420916738

269. Lavrysh Y. Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on higher education in Ukraine: Crisis or renewal? Educ Philos Theory. 2022; 0: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2056444

270. Kundu A, Bej T. COVID-19 response: students' readiness for shifting classes online. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc. 2021.

271. Asgari S, Trajkovic J, Rahmani M, Zhang W, Lo RC, Sciortino A. An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2021; 16: e1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250041 PMID: 33857219

272. Mahajan R, Kumar S, Agrawal M. Online teaching effectiveness: Lessons from Indian universities during the Covid-19 pandemic. 2023; 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22207

273. Churi P, Mistry K, Asad MM, Dhiman G, Soni M, Kose U. Online learning in COVID-19 pandemic: an empirical study of Indian and Turkish higher education institutions. World J Eng. 2022; 19: 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-12-2020-0631

274. Bird K, Castleman BL, Lohner G. Negative impacts from the shift to online learning during the COVID-19 crisis: evidence from a statewide community college system. 2020.

275. Zia A. Exploring factors influencing online classes due to social distancing in COVID-19 pandemic: a business students perspective. Int J Inf Learn Technol. 2020.

276. Rosenberg H, Nath A, Leppard J, Syed S. New challenges and mitigation strategies for resident selection during the coronavirus disease pandemic. Can J Emerg Med. 2020; 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2020.454 PMID: 32693851

277. Hasan N, Bao Y. Impact of “e-Learning crack-up” perception on psychological distress among college students during COVID-19 pandemic: A mediating role of “fear of academic year loss.” Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020; 118: 105355.

278. Akramy SA. Shocks and aftershocks of the COVID-19 pandemic in Afghanistan higher education institutions. Cogent Arts Humanit. 2022; 9. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2029802

279. Kavaric M, Kavaric A, Djokovic R. Challenges in online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: Higher education survey in Montenegro. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2021; 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.2013287

280. Behera AK, de Sousa RA, Oleksik V, Dong J, Fritzen D. Student perceptions of remote learning transitions in engineering disciplines during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-national study. Eur J Eng Educ. 2022; 0: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2080529

281. Tahara M, Mashizume Y, Takahashi K. Mental health crisis and stress coping among healthcare college students momentarily displaced from their campus community because of covid-19 restrictions in japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147245 PMID: 34299694

282. Hamza CA, Ewing L, Heath NL, Goldstein AL. Cuando el aislamiento social no es nada nuevo: un estudio longitudinal sobre la angustia psicológica durante el COVID-19 entre estudiantes universitarios con y sin problemas de salud mental preexistentes. Can Psychol Can. 2021.

283. Negi AS, Khanna A, Aggarwal R. Psychological health, stressors and coping mechanism of engineering students. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2019; 24: 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1570856

284. Barhate B, Hirudayaraj M, Nair PK. Leadership challenges and behaviours in the information technology sector during COVID-19: a comparative study of leaders from India and the U.S. Hum Resour Dev Int. 2022; 25: 274–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2069429

285. Jayalath C, Wickramasinghe U, Kottage H. Factors Influencing Orderly Transition to Online Deliveries during COVID19 Pandemic Impact. Asian J Educ Soc Stud. 2020; 9: 10–24. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJESS/2020/v9i230242

286. Manierre MJ, DeWaters J, Rivera S, Whalen M. An exploration of engineering instructors' pedagogical adaptations early in the COVID-19 pandemic. J Eng Educ. 2022; 111: 889–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20483
287. UNESCO. Covid-19 crisis and curriculum: sustaining quality outcomes in the context of remote learning. UNESCO Covid-19 Education Response Educ Sect Issue Notes Issue note No 42. 2020; 1–6. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373273.

288. WHO. Checklist to support schools re-opening and preparation for COVID-19 resurgences or similar public health crises. 2020.

289. Kapasia N, Paul P, Roy A, Das P, Ghosh T, Chouhan P. Perceived academic satisfaction level, psychological stress and academic risk among Indian students amidst COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon. 2022; 8: e09440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09440 PMID: 35600449

290. Chadha D, Kogelbauer A, Campbell J, Hellgardt K, Maraj M, Shah U, et al. Are the kids alright? Exploring students' experiences of support mechanisms to enhance wellbeing on an engineering programme in the UK. Eur J Eng Educ. 2020; 0: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1835828

291. Gross K. For Some Small Colleges, The Pandemic Could Sadly Be Their Savior. New Engl J High Educ. 2020.

292. Kruse SD, Hackmann DG, Lindle JC. Academic Leadership During a Pandemic: Department Heads Leading With a Focus on Equity. Front Educ. 2020; 5: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.614641

293. Elliott D, Harris K, Baron S. Crisis management and services marketing. Baron S, Harris K, Elliott D, editors. J Serv Mark. 2005; 19: 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040510609943

294. Aucejo EM, French J, Araya MPU, Zafar B. The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: Evidence from a survey. J Public Econ. 2020; 191: 104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104271 PMID: 32873994

295. Aristovnik A, Keržič D, Ravšelj D, Tomaževič N, Umek L. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustain. 2020; 12: 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438

296. Mok KH, Xiong W, Ke G, Cheung JOW. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on international higher education and student mobility: Student perspectives from mainland China and Hong Kong. Int J Educ Res. 2021; 105: 101718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101718 PMID: 35719275

297. Mae S. Higher Ambitions: How American Plans for Post-Secondary Education. 2020.

298. Ramsey JL. On Not Defining Sustainability. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2015; 28: 1075–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3

299. Purvis B, Mao Y, Robinson D. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustain Sci. 2019; 14: 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5

300. Julia Kiran Desha C, James Hargroves K, Harrison Smith M. THE IMPORTANCE OF SUSTAINABILITY IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION: A TOOLKIT OF INFORMATION AND TEACHING MATERIAL UNEP IRP-Options for Decoupling GDP from freshwater consumption and water pollution View project. 2011. Available: www.naturaledgeproject.net.

301. Crawford J, Cifuentes-Faura J. Sustainability in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Sustainability. 2022; 14: 1879.

302. Felgueiras MC, Rocha JS, Caetano N. Engineering education towards sustainability. Energy Procedia. 2017; 136: 414–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.266

303. Abu-Goukh ME, Ibraheem GM, Goukh HMEA. Engineering Education for Sustainability and Economic Growth in Developing Countries (the Sudanese Case). Procedia—Soc Behav Sci. 2013; 102: 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.757.

304. Schultz PW. Conservation means behavior. Conservation biology: the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. United States; 2011. pp. 1080–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01766.x PMID: 22070255

305. Borg C, Gericke N, Höglund H-O, Bergman E. Subject-and experience-bound differences in teachers' conceptual understanding of sustainable development. Environ Educ Res. 2014; 20: 526–551.

306. UNESCO. UNESCO Roadmap for Implementing the GAP on Education for Sustainable Development. 2014; 48223.

307. Welfare F. Salient Features of “UGC Guidelines for Re-opening the Universities and Colleges Post Lockdown due to COVID-19 Pandemic.”: 1–5.

308. UGC. UGC Guidelines for Re-Opening the Universities and Colleges Post Lockdown Due To Covid-19 Pandemic. In: UGC. 2020.

309. Nguyen LM, Poleacovschi C, Faust KM, Padgett-Walsh K, Feinstein SG, Vaziri B, et al. COVID-19 pandemic reveals challenges in engineering ethics education. Int J Ethics Educ. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-022-00156-4
310. Male S, Marinelli M, Chapman E. Creating Inclusive Engineering and Computer Science Classes—the impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and perceptions of gender inclusivity. 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). 2021. pp. 456–458. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9453990

311. Niu SX, Tienda M. Choosing colleges: Identifying and modeling choice sets. Soc Sci Res. 2008; 37: 416–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.015

312. Borrego M, Douglas E, Amelink C. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. J Eng Educ. 2009; 98: 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x

313. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications; 2017.

314. Creswell JW. The Process of Conducting Research Using Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Educ Res Planning, Conduct Eval Quant Qual Res. 2012; 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1963.10116709

315. Steckler A, McLeroy KR, Goodman RM, Bird ST, McCormick L. Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Educ Q. 1992; 19: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819201900101 PMID: 1568869

316. Tight M. Researching Higher Education. 2015. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315675404

317. Maringe F, Gibbs P. Marketing Higher Education. McGraw-Hill House. 1989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.1989.tb01499.x

318. Yelkur R. Customer Satisfaction and the Services Marketing Mix. J Prof Serv Mark. 2000; 21: 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1300/J090v21n01

319. Neuman WL. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson ed. Pearson education., editor. Pearson education.: Pearson education.; 2013.

320. Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2016; 5: 1–4.

321. Kolb B. Marketing Research for and Creative Organizations. Marketing Research. 2008.

322. Creswell JW. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

323. Stevens JP. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge; 2012.

324. Floyd F, Widaman F. Factor Analysis in the Development and Refinement of Clinical Assessment Instruments. Psychol Assess. 1995; 7: 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286

325. Maxwell Scott E. Sample Size and Multiple Regression Analysis. Psychol Methods. 2000; 5: 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.5.4.434 PMID: 11194207

326. Kotler P, Armstrong G, Saunders J, Wong V. Principles of Marketing. 4th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall Europe; 2016.

327. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research Methods in Education. British Journal of Educational Studies. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00388_4.x

328. Ary D, Jacobs LC, Sorensen CK, Walker DA. Introduction to Research in Education. 8th ed. USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2010.

329. Van Teijlingen ER, Hundley V. The importance of pilot studies. 2001.

330. Kenneth NR. Quantitative Research Methods in Educational Planning. Quantitative Research Methods in Educational Planning. UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning; 2005.

331. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge; 2020.

332. Powers DA, Xie Y. Statistical methods for categorical data analysis. Statew Agric L Use Baseline 2015. 1999; 1: 309. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

333. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Appl Mult Regression/Correlation Anal Behav Sci. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441

334. Fox J. Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models. 2016.

335. Pallant J. SPSS SURVIVAL MANUAL: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 12). 2005.

336. Daoud JI. Multicollinearity and Regression Analysis. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018; 949. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/949/1/012009

337. Chattefuee S, Hadi AS. Regression Analysis by Example: Fourth Edition. Regression Analysis by Example: Fourth Edition. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470055464
338. Miles J. Tolerance and variance inflation factor. Wiley StatsRef Stat Ref Online. 2014.

339. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951; 16: 297–334.

340. Churchill GA Jr. A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. J Mark Res. 1979; XVI: 64–73.

341. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill New York; 1967.

342. Briggs SR, Cheek JM. The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. J Pers. 1986; 54: 106–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x

343. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates. Inc; 1988.

344. Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In Marcoulides G. A. (Ed.). Mod Methods Bus Res. 1998; 295: 295–336.

345. Glenn ND, Shelton BA. Pre-adult background variables and divorce: A note of caution about overreliance on explained variance. J Marriage Fam. 1983.

346. Conard MJ, Conard MA. An analysis of academic reputation as perceived by consumers of higher education. J Mark High Educ. 2000; 9: 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v09n04_05

347. Gill T, Vidal Rodeiro C, Zanini N. Higher education choices of secondary school graduates with a Science, Technology, Engineering or Mathematics (STEM) background. J Furth High Educ. 2018; 42: 998–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1332358

348. Davies S, Guppy N. Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education. Soc Forces. 1997; 75: 1417–1438. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/75.4.1417

349. Price I, Matzdorf F, Smith L, Agahi H. The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities. 2003; 21: 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770310493580

350. Hannagan T. Marketing for the non-profit sector. Springer; 1992.

351. Michel JO, Kessler E. Higher Education Sustainability Professionals BT—Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. In: Leal Filho W, editor. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_146–1

352. Mahajan P, Patil V. Making it normal for 'new' enrollments: effect of institutional and pandemic influence on selecting engineering institutions under the COVID-19 pandemic situation. Heliyon. 2021; 7: e08217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08217 PMID: 34693065

353. Marinoni G, Van't Land H, Jensen T. The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world. IAU Glob Surv Rep. 2020.

354. Singh S. Investigating the Status of Women Engineers in Education and Employment during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Challenges. 2022; 13: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010027

355. Tan L, Main JB, Darolia R. Using random forest analysis to identify student demographic and high school-level factors that predict college engineering major choice. J Eng Educ. 2021; 110: 572–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20393

356. Niu L. Family Socioeconomic Status and Choice of Stem Major in College: An Analysis of a National Sample. Coll Stud J. 2017; 51: 298–312.

357. Brennan A, Dempsey M, McAvoy J, O'Dea M, O'Leary S, Prendergast M. How COVID-19 impacted soft skills development: The views of software engineering students. Cogent Educ. 2023; 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2171621

358. CDC. Considerations for institutions of higher education. In: Retrieved Jan [Internet]. 2021 p. 2020. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/colleges-universities/considerations.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Fcommunity%2Fguidance-ihe-response.html

359. Bird KA. Negative impacts from the shift to online learning during the COVID-19 crisis: Evidence from a statewide community college system. 2020.

360. Gurukkal R. Will COVID 19 Turn Higher Education into Another Mode? High Educ Futur. 2020; 7: 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120931606

361. Sodhi GK, Kaur S, Gaba GS, Kansal L, Sharma A, Dhiman G. COVID-19: Role of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine learning during pandemic. Curr Med imaging. 2021.

362. Dhiman G, Kumar V. Seagull optimization algorithm: Theory and its applications for large-scale industrial engineering problems. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2019; 165: 169–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.11.024.

363. Gupta R, Aggarwal A, Sable D, Chahar P, Sharma A, Kumari A, et al. Covid-19 Pandemic and Online Education: Impact on Students, Parents and Teachers. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2022; 32: 426–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2021.1909518
364. Aisha N, Ratra A. Online education amid COVID-19 pandemic and its opportunities, challenges and psychological impacts among students and teachers: a systematic review. Asian Assoc Open Univ J. 2022; 17: 242–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-03-2022-0028

365. Grodotzki J, Upadhya S, Tekkaya AE. Engineering education amid a global pandemic. Adv Ind Manuf Eng. 2021; 3: 100058.

366. Wong P, Ng PML, Lee D, Lam R. Examining the impact of perceived source credibility on attitudes and intentions towards taking advice from others on university choice. Int J Educ Manag. 2019; 34: 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2019-0190

367. Veloutsou C, Paton RA, Lewis J. Consultation and reliability of information sources pertaining to university selection: Some questions answered? Int J Educ Manag. 2005; 19: 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540510599617

368. Berge M, Silfver EDanielsson A. In search of the new engineer: gender, age, and social class in information about engineering education. Eur J Eng Educ. 2019; 44: 650–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1523133

369. Briggs S, Wilson A. Which university? A study of the influence of cost and information factors on Scottish undergraduate choice. J High Educ Policy Manag. 2007; 29: 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800601175789

370. Ng AWY. Changes in the usefulness of communication channels for prospective undergraduates about university studying: afore and during the pandemic. Int J Educ Manag. 2023;ahead-of-p. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2022-0154

371. Sia JKM, Ming KEE. A model of higher education institutions choice in Malaysia-A conceptual approach. College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia.; 2010.

372. Telli Yamamoto G. University evaluation-selection: A Turkish case. Int J Educ Manag. 2006; 20: 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610704654

373. Tonmoy TK, Islam MA. Do students look for information differently? Information-seeking behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Digit Libr Perspect. 2023;ahead-of-p. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-09-2022-0073

374. Mason AN, Narcum J, Mason K. Social media marketing gains importance after Covid-19. Cogent Bus Manag. 2021; 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1870797

375. Matusovich H, Gillen A, Carrico C, Knight D, Grohs J. Outcome expectations and environmental factors associated with engineering college-going: A case study. J Pre-College Eng Educ Res. 2020; 10. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1236

376. Finch D, McDonald S, Staple J. Reputational interdependence: an examination of category reputation in higher education. J Mark High Educ. 2013; 23: 34–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2013.810184

377. Coombs WT. An Analytic Framework for Crisis Situations: Better Responses From a Better Understanding of the Situation. J Public Relations Res. 1998; 10: 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1003_02

378. Zuhairi A, Raymundo MRDR, Mir K. Implementing quality assurance system for open and distance learning in three Asian open universities: Philippines, Indonesia and Pakistan. Asian Assoc Open Univ J. 2020; 15: 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-05-2020-0034

379. Cahapay MB. Rethinking Education in the New Normal Post-COVID-19 Era: A Curriculum Studies Perspective. Aquademia. 2020; 4: ep20018. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8315

380. Denzler S, Wolter S. Too Far to Go? Does Distance Determine Study Choices? IZA Discuss Pap. 2011. Report No.: 5712. Available: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201105306388.

381. Schündeln M. Are immigrants more mobile than natives? Evidence from Germany. J Reg Sci. 2014; 54: 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12072

382. MacLeod WB, Riehl E, Saavedra JE, Urquiola M. The big sort: College reputation and labor market outcomes. Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2017; 9: 223–261. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160126

383. Munisamy S, Mohd Jaafar NI, Nagaraj S. Does Reputation Matter? Case Study of Undergraduate Choice at a Premier University. Asia-Pacific Educ Res. 2014; 23: 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0120-y

384. Gokuladas VK. Factors that influence first-career choice of undergraduate engineers in software services companies. Career Dev Int. 2010; 15: 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431011040941

385. Plewa C, Ho J, Conduit J, Karpen IO. Reputation in higher education: A fuzzy set analysis of resource configurations. J Bus Res. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.024
386. Le TD, Robinson LJ, Dobele AR. Understanding high school students use of choice factors and word-of-mouth information sources in university selection. Stud High Educ. 2020; 45: 808-818. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564259

387. Bao W. COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020; 2: 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191 PMID: 32510042

388. Sood S, Sharma A. Resilience and Psychological Well-Being of Higher Education Students During COVID-19: The Mediating Role of Perceived Distress. 2021; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063420983111

389. Naukkarinen J, Bairoh S. Gender differences in professional identities and development of engineering skills among early career engineers in Finland. Eur J Eng Educ. 2022; 47: 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1929851

390. Chen MA, Raveendran G. Urban Employment in India: Recent Trends and Patterns. Margin. 2012; 6: 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/097380101200600204

391. Sahney S, Banwet DK, Karunes S. A SERVQUAL and QFD approach to total quality education. Int J Product Perform Manag. 2004; 53: 143-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400410515043

392. Agu AG. Students' switching intentions for graduate education services: examining the influence of service quality, price, and attractiveness of alternative. J Mark High Educ. 2022; 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2022.2101171

393. Murphy MPA. COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemp Secur Policy. 2020; 41: 492-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749

394. Yusuf BN, Jihan A. Are we prepared enough? A case study of challenges in online learning in a private higher learning institution during the Covid-19 outbreaks. Adv Soc Sci Res J. 2020; 7: 205-212.

395. Cheng SY, Wang CJ, Shen ACT, Chang SC. How to Safely Reopen Colleges and Universities During COVID-19: Experiences From Taiwan. Ann Intern Med. 2020; 173: 638-641. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-2927 PMID: 32614638

396. Yang R. China's higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: some preliminary observations. High Educ Res Dev. 2020; 39: 1317-1321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1824212

397. Bordoloi R. Perception towards online / blended learning at the time of Covid-19 pandemic: an academic analytics in the Indian context. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2020-0079

398. Tesar M. Towards a Post-Covid-19 'New Normality?': Physical and Social Distancing, the Move to Online and Higher Education. Policy Futur Educ. 2020; 18: 556-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320935671

399. Ministry of Human Resource Development Government of India. National Education Policy 2020. 2020. pp. 1-66. Available: https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf.