# Biocatalytic synthesis of coumarin S-glycosides: towards non-cytotoxic probes for biomedical imaging and sensing

Nastassja Burrini, Arnaud Pâris, Guillaume Collet, Pierre Lafite, Richard

Daniellou

► To cite this version:

Nastassja Burrini, Arnaud Pâris, Guillaume Collet, Pierre Lafite, Richard Daniellou. Biocatalytic synthesis of coumarin S-glycosides: towards non-cytotoxic probes for biomedical imaging and sensing. Molecules, 2024, 29 (6), pp.1322. 10.3390/molecules29061322. hal-04510330

HAL Id: hal-04510330

https://hal.science/hal-04510330v1

Submitted on 18 Mar 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

molecules

IMPACT
FACTOR
4.6

Indexed in:
PubMed

CITESCORE
6.7

Article

# Biocatalytic Synthesis of Coumarin S-Glycosides: Towards Non-Cytotoxic Probes for Biomedical Imaging and Sensing

Nastassja Burrini, Arnaud Pâris, Guillaume Collet, Pierre Lafite and Richard Daniellou

Special Issue

Carbohydrate Chemistry II

Edited by
Prof. Dr. Alberto Marra

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
Article

# Biocatalytic Synthesis of Coumarin S-Glycosides: Towards Non-Cytotoxic Probes for Biomedical Imaging and Sensing

Nastassja Burrini<fnref n="1" />, Arnaud Pâris<fnref n="1" />,*, Guillaume Collet<fnref n="2" />, Pierre Lafite<fnref n="1" />,* and Richard Daniellou<fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="3" />,†

**Abstract:** This study unveils an innovative method for synthesizing coumarin S-glycosides, employing original biocatalysts able to graft diverse carbohydrate structures onto 7-mercapto-4-methyl-coumarin in one-pot reactions. The fluorescence properties of the generated thio-derivatives were assessed, providing valuable insights into their potential applications in biological imaging or sensing. In addition, the synthesized compounds exhibited no cytotoxicity across various human cell lines. This research presents a promising avenue for the development of coumarin S-glycosides, paving the way for their application in diverse biomedical research areas.

**Keywords:** biocatalyst; S-glycoside; mercapto-coumarin; fluorescence

## 1. Introduction

Glycosides, a prominent class of natural compounds, play a pivotal role in numerous biological processes and hold substantial potential for therapeutic applications [1–3]. Among these, O-glycosides and S-glycosides stand out as essential subclasses, distinguished by the nature of the linkage connecting the sugar moiety to aglycone. O-glycosides, characterized by the attachment of the glycosidic linkage to an oxygen atom, constitute a vast and versatile class of compounds. Abundantly present in natural products and plant secondary metabolites, O-glycosides significantly contribute to the structural complexity and functionality of these bioactive molecules. Understanding the stereo- and regio-chemistry of O-glycosidic linkages is crucial for elucidating their biological roles and harnessing their applications in drug discovery and development. Simultaneously, the exploration of S-glycosides has emerged as an exciting field in glycoside chemistry. These structures, wherein the conventional anomeric oxygen is replaced by a sulfur atom, show remarkable physicochemical properties. Of particular interest is their heightened stability towards enzymatic and acid/base hydrolyses when compared to their O-glycoside counterparts [4]. Consequently, S-glycosides have proven to be useful tools in chemical synthesis and functioning as stable ligands essential for the crystallographic analysis of protein-ligand complex structures [5]. Moreover they play a pivotal role in the development of carbohydrate-based vaccine antigens [6,7] and act as substrate analogues or inhibitors of Glycosides Hydrolases (GHs) involved in many diseases, including cancer, lysosomal storage disorder, and viral and bacterial infections [8]. In the domain of organic chemistry, the evaluation of these derivatives has led to the development of intricate synthesis methodologies [9,10] and metal-catalyzed reactions [11–13], necessitating elaborated protection/deprotection procedures and precise control over the configuration of the anomeric carbon. Enzymes have emerged as potent synthetic tools facilitating the environmentally sustainable generation of diverse compound classes. The employment of non-organic solvents and mild experimental conditions and the intrinsic high regio- or stereo-specificity

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Burrini, N.; Pâris, A.; Collet, G.; Lafite, P.; Daniellou, R. Biocatalytic Synthesis of Coumarin S-Glycosides: Towards Non-Cytotoxic Probes for Biomedical Imaging and Sensing.
*Molecules* **2024**, *29*, 1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061322

Academic Editor: Alberto Marra

Received: 26 February 2024

Revised: 13 March 2024

Accepted: 14 March 2024

Published: 16 March 2024

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2024 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

<footnote n="1">¹ Institut de Chimie Organique et Analytique, University of Orléans CNRS UMR7311, F-45067 Orléans, France; nastassja.burrini@univ-orleans.fr (N.B.); arnaud.paris@univ-orleans.fr (A.P.)</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Chaire de Cosmétologie, AgroParisTech, 10 rue Léonard de Vinci, F-45100 Orléans, France; guillaume.collet@agroparistech.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: pierre.lafite@univ-orleans.fr (P.L.); richard.daniellou@agroparistech.fr (R.D.)</footnote>
inherent to biocatalyzed reactions have considerably enhanced the utility of enzymes in transformation processes, ranging from laboratory-scale to industrial context [14]. Starting from these interesting results, in 2003, Withers et al. presented the first generation of thioglycoligases (Abg E170A from *Aspergillus* sp. and Man2A E249A from *Cellulomonas fimi*). These enzymes demonstrated the capability to catalyze the formation of S-glycosidic bonds [15]. Derived from retaining GHs, their acid/base residue essential for the hydrolytic activity has been substituted via site-directed mutagenesis with a non-catalytically active amino acid, such as alanine (A), glutamine (Q), or asparagine (N). Following a comparable strategy, our research team has developed a repertoire of thioglycoligases through the selective modification of the active site of several GHs, derived from the thermophilic organism *Dictyoglomus thermophilum* [4,16–18]. These mutants, characterized by a drastic reduction in their hydrolytic activities due to the replacement of the catalytic residue with either alanine or glutamine, can efficiently catalyze the binding of a specific carbohydrate molecule onto an aromatic thiol, resulting in the synthesis of S-glycoside derivatives with a high yield.

In the context of this study, 7-mercapto-4-methylcoumarin (7-MC) has been identified as a valuable sugar acceptor [17,19,20] (Figure 1). Within the expansive family of coumarins, this compound exhibits the common structure with the benzene ring fused to an α-pyrone moiety. Notably, the distinctive sulfur-side chain at position 7 contributes to the compound's reactivity, offering a catalyst for derivatization, enabling precise customization for targeted applications or desired biological activities [21]. Despite the relatively lower spotlight compared to its O-counterpart, 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MUB), 7-MC proves to be chemically and bioactively promising in the field of biological and material sciences. Recognized as a frontier substrate, it serves as a versatile platform to synthesize a variety of bioactive compounds [22,23]. Moreover, its efficacy as a matrix for analyzing small molecular compounds is acknowledged [24]. The versatility of 7-MC is highlighted across diverse applications, as evidenced by its role as a reporter molecule [25], involvement in thiol interactions at the nanoparticle surface [26], serving as Raman reporter [27–29], proving to be an excellent substrate for fluorescence spectroscopy [30], demonstrating photodimerizable and healable properties [31], and functioning as fluorescent dye [32,33]. Additionally, it acts as a probe molecule on gold-coated silicon nanowires [34] and excels as a fluorophore [35–37], making it particularly valuable in biological and chemical sensing applications. This compound serves as an effective tool for the detection and quantification of various substances, including biomolecules, or to evaluate the activity of specific enzymes belonging to the family of GHs [4,38]. Its fluorescence emission is responsive to specific environmental conditions or interactions with targets, rendering it a versatile asset for sensing and imaging purposes.

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Structures of 7-MC and 4-MUB.</figcaption></figure>

In this article, we present the efficient biocatalyzed synthesis of diverse S-glycosidic coumarins, along with their cytotoxic evaluation and exploration of their fluorescent properties as promising fluorescent probes.

## 2. Results and Discussion

### 2.1. *Biocatalyzed Synthesis of S-Glycosidic Coumarins*

To ensure the catalytic efficacy of the mutated GHs, it is necessary to employ glycosyl donors and acceptors compatible with the double-displacement mechanism inherent in configuration-retaining glycosides [15].
The activation of sugars is essential for conducting the enzymatic glycosylation step efficiently. For this reason, a panel of commercially available *p*-nitrophenyl-D-glycopyranosides (*p*NP-glycosides) has been selected as sugar donors (Scheme 1). To prevent the formation of disulfide bonds, the reactions were carried out in the presence of a large excess of dithiothreitol (DTT, 10 equiv.) and followed by HPLC. The resulting products were purified by semi-preparative HPLC and characterized by NMR and HRMS, as reported in the Supplementary Materials and in Table 1.

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 1.** General scheme of thioglycosylation reaction.</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Conversion of the enzymatic thioglycosylation reactions and chemical yield of the isolated product production with the desired anomeric selectivity.</caption><thead><tr><th>Substrate</th><th>Product</th><th>Conversion (%)</th><th>Yield (%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>pNP-β-D-GlcA</td><td>S-1</td><td>75</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>pNP-β-D-Xyl</td><td>S-2</td><td>80</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>pNP-β-D-Glc</td><td>S-3</td><td>79</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>pNP-β-D-Gal</td><td>S-4</td><td>73</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>pNP-β-D-Fuc</td><td>S-5</td><td>78</td><td>68</td></tr><tr><td>pNP-α-D-Gal</td><td>S-6</td><td>81</td><td>63</td></tr></tbody></table>

The synthesis of S-glycosides poses significant challenges in chemical synthesis, often requiring multiple protection/deprotection steps, intricate stereochemical control, and extensive purification efforts [39,40]. However, an alternative approach utilizing enzymatic catalysis with engineered GHs presents an attractive option due to its ability to yield
products with a pure anomeric configuration. In this study, several thioglycoligases were used as catalysts to glycosylate **7-MC** in a one-pot reaction.

Compound **S-1** was obtained following a previously established procedure [17]. The aromatic acceptor was efficiently glycosylated by DtGlcAE396Q mutant, using *p*NP-GlcA as the glucuronide donor, resulting in a 75% conversion, as determined by HPLC analysis. The ¹H-NMR analysis shows a chemical shift (δ 4.97 ppm) and a coupling constant (*J* = 9.1 Hz), confirming the β-configuration of the aryl-glucuronide.

As compound **S-1**, the other thioglycosides, **S-2** to **S-6**, bearing, respectively, β-D-xylopyranosyl, β-D-glucopyranosyl, β-D-galactopyranosyl, β-D-fucopyranosyl, and α-D-galactopyranosyl moieties, were also synthetized in a one-step process and the anomeric configurations were assessed by ¹H-NMR spectroscopy.

In this study, we used the efficacy of several mutated GHs, with each exhibiting selective affinity towards specific glycosides, in catalyzing the thioligation reaction between the activated sugar substrate and 7-MC. This approach bypasses the need for laborious protection/deprotection protocols typically encountered in chemical synthesis, thereby simplifying the formation of *S*-glycosides with the desired configuration [11,41].

Our research underscores the potential of enzymatic glycosylation as a robust method for synthetizing *S*-derivatives with remarkable efficiency [19]. Through the fusion of engineered GHs' selectivity and efficiency with the simplicity and convenience of one-pot reactions, we have developed a versatile and practical approach for grafting diverse glycoside coumarins. Notably, our work marks the inaugural enzymatic synthesis of **S-2**, **S-4** to **S-6**, a significant milestone in glycoscience. This innovative methodology not only facilitates precise control over stereochemistry and molecular structure but also represents a pioneering leap forward in the field.

## 2.2. Cytotoxic Activity

To use these *S*-glycosidic compounds in cellulo, the potential impact of the glycosidic linkage nature on the anticancer activity was assessed. The *S*-glycoside derivatives and the 7-MC were tested against four human cancer cell lines and a healthy one, namely A549 (lung carcinoma), HS-683 (glioma cancer), MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma), SK-MEL-28 (melanoma skin cancer), and HaCaT (keratinocyte normal skin), using MTT (thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) assay, as previously described in the literature [42–44]. The selected reference drugs were 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and etoposide. The results listed in Table 2 (IC50 value, defined as the concentration, inducing a 50% decrease in cell growth after 3 days of incubation) show that most coumarin-containing compounds display no inhibitory activities against the cell-line panel tested (>1000 µM). The only exception is **S-2**, which shows a moderate cytotoxic activity against the lung carcinoma cell line A-549, with an IC50 value of 74 µM.

<table><caption>**Table 2.** The cytotoxic activities of the synthesized compounds and standard anticancer agents expressed in terms of IC50 (µM). The 95% confidence interval values are indicated in parentheses.</caption><thead><tr><th>Compound</th><th>A-549</th><th>HS683</th><th>MCF-7</th><th>SK-MEL-28</th><th>HaCaT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-1</td><td>&gt;1000 <sup>a</sup></td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td></tr><tr><td>S-2</td><td>74.8 (20.5–273.1)</td><td>275.0 (110.5–684.5)</td><td>128.4 (28.7–575.6)</td><td>227.6 (160.9–321.8)</td><td>161.9 (120.6–732.7)</td></tr><tr><td>S-3</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td></tr><tr><td>S-4</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td></tr><tr><td>S-5</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td></tr><tr><td>S-6</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>&gt;1000</td></tr><tr><td>7-MC</td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>n.d.<sup>b</sup></td><td>&gt;1000</td><td>306.1 (210.1–446.0)</td><td>n.d.</td></tr><tr><td>5-FU</td><td>8.9 (6.3–12.5)</td><td>37.0 (29.8–45.9)</td><td>4.8 (3.8–6.2)</td><td>6.6 (5.2–8.3)</td><td>0.4 (0.3–0.5)</td></tr><tr><td>Etoposide</td><td>1.6 (1.3–2.0)</td><td>1.6 (1.4–1.8)</td><td>3.9 (2.8–5.4)</td><td>3.2 (2.8–3.8)</td><td>0.5 (0.4–0.6)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote><sup>a</sup> No significant inhibition was observed above 100 µM. <sup>b</sup> Not determined.</footnote>
This finding is particularly noteworthy, considering the well-documented cytotoxic
properties associated with umbelliferone and its derivatives, which share the coumarin
structural framework [45–47]. The discrepancy between our results and prior research un-
derscores the importance of evaluating the cytotoxicity of structurally modified compounds
to optimize their pharmacological properties.

Given their non-cytotoxic nature, *S*-glycosyl coumarins hold promise for alternative biomedical applications. These include their potential use as imaging agents, incorporation into drug delivery systems for the safe transportation of therapeutic agents to targeted cells or tissues, and utilization as biochemical probes to study biochemical processes. In fact, while our study primarily focused on their non-cytotoxic properties, further research may uncover additional therapeutic applications for *S*-glycosyl coumarins, leveraging their unique chemical properties, such as anti-inflammatory or antioxidant effects.

## 2.3. *Optical Spectroscopy*

UV-visible spectral analysis was conducted using dimethylformamide (DMF) as the initial solvent at a concentration of 10 mM to ensure optimal solubility of the compounds. Subsequently, the analysis was carried out under two distinct conditions: firstly, in DMF, at a final concentration of 0.1 mM; and secondly, in a mixture PBS:DMF (99:1%), at the same final concentration of 0.1 mM. These two experimental setups provided valuable insights into the spectral characteristics of the compounds in both a pure organic solvent and a solvent system closely resembling physiological conditions. The maxima absorption wavelengths are compiled in Table 3. These bands were attributed to transitions within the benzene and pyrone moieties, considered together as a single chromophore. In the UV region, the absorbance spectrum of **4-MUB** displayed a broad peak centered at λ<sub>max</sub> = 322 nm, using DMF as solvent. Similarly, **7-MC** and **S-1** to **S-6** compounds also absorb in this UV range (λ<sub>max</sub> = 328–330 nm). However, the extinction coefficients for *S*-glycosides exhibit variability. In the organic solvent, these values are found to be higher compared to those calculated for **4-MUB** and **7-MC**. Conversely, in PBS, the extinction coefficients for *S*-glycosides are lower compared to the parent thiol **7-MC**. This highlights the profound impact of glycosylation on absorption properties, as well as the importance of solvent choice.

Furthermore, an increase in solvent polarity, transitioning from DMF to PBS, in-
duced shifts in absorption spectra, either redshifts (**7-MC** and **4-MUB**) or blueshifts (all
*S*-glycosides). This phenomenon implies a significant disparity between the polarity of the
ground and excited states [48]. The introduction of a *-SH* substitution into the coumarin
core notably perturbed the spectrum, while variations in pH strongly influenced the ab-
sorption properties of **7-MC** [49]. To mitigate potential disulfide bridge formation, spectra
of **7-MC** were recorded with the addition of 10 mM DTT to the solution.

All compounds displayed similar fluorescence excitation maxima (320–333 nm) and emission maxima (380–392 nm) wavelengths in DMF (Table 3, Figure 2, and Supplementary Figures S28–S35). In PBS solvent, this homogeneity in the latter disappeared, as the unglycosylated **4-MUB** and **7-MC** exhibited fluorescence emission maxima at 448 nm. On the other hand, the glycosylation of **S-1** to **S-6** led to similar fluorescence emission maxima at 402–416 nm wavelengths (Table 3 and Supplementary Figures S36–S43).

Quantum yields (relative to **4-MUB** in DMF) [50] were also determined for all *S*-glycosides, and they revealed that grafting a glycoside onto **7-MC** gave a higher yield. Indeed, when using either DMF or PBS as the solvent, compounds **S-1** to **S-6** exhibited a 10-fold increase in their quantum yield compared to **7-MC**. The values determined were close to those observed for the **4-MUB** fluorophore.

The choice of the solvent plays a crucial role in dictating the fluorescence behavior of
the investigated compounds. Notably, when comparing their behavior in PBS to DMF, we
observed a consistent increase in emission intensity for the *S*-derivatives in PBS, except for
*S-2* and *S-6*. This discrepancy primarily arises from the different polarity and hydrogen-
bonding capabilities of the two solvents. PBS is renowned for its high polarity and the
presence of phosphate ions, which can readily engage in hydrogen-bonding interactions
with the functional groups of the S-glycosides. These interactions facilitate the stabilization of the excited state, consequently leading to heightened fluorescence emission. Moreover, the polar environment of PBS may shield the molecules from non-radiative decay processes, further enhancing fluorescence intensity. Conversely, the organic nature of DMF introduces distinct dynamics to the excited state relaxation pathways of the S-glycosides. Being a less polar solvent, DMF may exert a weaker influence on the stabilization of the excited states compared to PBS. Additionally, the formation of hydrogen-bonding interactions, different from those present in PBS, might alter the energetic landscape of the excited states, potentially resulting in lower fluorescence emission and quantum yields. Furthermore, microenvironment effects within each solvent could also contribute to the observed differences in fluorescence behavior. Variations in solute-solvent interactions, solvent accessibility to the chromophore, and local concentration effects may differently influence the fluorescence properties in PBS and DMF. However, this trend does not hold for S-6, where its quantum yield is higher in DMF than in PBS. This disparity suggests that the specific molecular structure and electronic properties of the α-glycoside lead to a different interaction with the organic solvent, possibly favoring its excited state stabilization and resulting in enhanced fluorescence emission. This phenomenon underscores the crucial role of solvent selection in modulating the photophysical properties of the investigated compounds.

<table><caption>**Table 3.** Spectroscopic properties of 4-MUB, 7-MC, and S-derivatives in organic solvent and PBS: absorption, emission, and excitation fluorescence wavelengths maxima (λmax); molar absorption coefficient (εmax); and relative quantum yield, Φ.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="3">Compound</th><th colspan="4">Absorbance</th><th colspan="4">Fluorescence</th></tr><tr><th colspan="2">λ<sub>max abs</sub> (nm)</th><th colspan="2">ε (10<sup>3</sup> M<sup>-1</sup> cm<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th colspan="2">λ<sub>max ex</sub> (nm)</th><th colspan="2">λ<sub>max em</sub> (nm)</th><th colspan="2">Φ</th></tr><tr><th>DMF</th><th>PBS</th><th>DMF</th><th>PBS</th><th>DMF</th><th>PBS</th><th>DMF</th><th>PBS</th><th>DMF</th><th>PBS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>4-MUB</td><td>322</td><td>324</td><td>17.0</td><td>20.2</td><td>320</td><td>333</td><td>380</td><td>448</td><td>0.081 <sup>a</sup></td><td>0.293</td></tr><tr><td>7-MC <sup>b</sup></td><td>328</td><td>368</td><td>10.4</td><td>28.9</td><td>334</td><td>321</td><td>392</td><td>448</td><td>0.009</td><td>0.020</td></tr><tr><td>S-1</td><td>330</td><td>326</td><td>26.7</td><td>23.3</td><td>332</td><td>332</td><td>390</td><td>402</td><td>0.182</td><td>0.235</td></tr><tr><td>S-2</td><td>330</td><td>324</td><td>19.5</td><td>26.0</td><td>332</td><td>326</td><td>386</td><td>402</td><td>0.186</td><td>0.181</td></tr><tr><td>S-3</td><td>330</td><td>326</td><td>18.6</td><td>20.8</td><td>332</td><td>332</td><td>386</td><td>402</td><td>0.198</td><td>0.242</td></tr><tr><td>S-4</td><td>330</td><td>326</td><td>22.3</td><td>18.4</td><td>334</td><td>332</td><td>388</td><td>402</td><td>0.223</td><td>0.271</td></tr><tr><td>S-5</td><td>330</td><td>326</td><td>22.3</td><td>10.4</td><td>334</td><td>326</td><td>386</td><td>402</td><td>0.183</td><td>0.228</td></tr><tr><td>S-6</td><td>330</td><td>326</td><td>22.3</td><td>19.8</td><td>334</td><td>332</td><td>388</td><td>416</td><td>0.223</td><td>0.185</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Representative normalized emission spectra of 4-MUB, 7-MC, and S-3 in PBS (left) and DMF (right). All spectra are available in the Supplementary Materials.</figcaption></figure>

Previous studies, as reported in the literature [38,49], have demonstrated that the alkylation or introduction of a disaccharide at position 7 of 7-MC significantly alters its fluorescence properties, resulting in increased emission. Similarly, our investigation

<footnote><sup>a</sup> From ref. [50]. <sup>b</sup> In presence of 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT).</footnote>
shows that glycosylation of the thiol function by a monosaccharide also induces alterations
in the fluorescence properties of **7-MC** in both aqueous buffer and DMF. The observed
increase in fluorescence for S-glycosides compared to **7-MC** may be attributed to structural
changes or a stabilization of the excited state of **7-MC** through favorable π-π interactions or
hydrogen bonding.

A comparison of the fluorescence properties of **4-MUB**, **7-MC**, and S-glycosides across solvents provides insights into their structural and chemical properties. While **7-MC** exhibited low fluorescence characteristics in both DMF and PBS despite the addition of DTT, substitution of the thiol group into –OH or the introduction of a monosaccharide at position 7 led to solvent-dependent variations. This underscores the importance of considering both the molecular structure and solvent environment in understanding the fluorescence phenomena.

Finally, in the scope of using those fluorescent compounds in a cellular context, the
limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for a representative S-glycoside,
namely **S-3**, were determined in PBS buffer, and they were found to be, respectively,
0.2 µM and 0.05 µM (see Supplementary Figure S44). Therefore, these fluorescent S-
glycosyl coumarins are promising chemical probes for the detection of sub-micromolar-
range processes.

**3. Materials and Methods**

**3.1. *Chemical Synthesis***

*p*-Nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside, *p*-nitrophenyl-β-D-fucopyranoside, *p*-nitrophenyl-
β-D-xylopyranoside, *p*-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranosiduronic acid, *p*-nitrophenyl-β-D-
galactopyranoside, and *p*-nitrophenyl-α-D-galactopyranoside were purchased from Car-
bosynth. **7-MC** and **4-MUB** were acquired from Sigma Aldrich. All chemical reagents were
used directly without further purification. ¹H and ¹³C NMR were recorded on Avance III
HD NanoBay Bruker (Billerica, MA, USA) at 400 MHz (¹³C NMR: 100 MHz). Chemical
shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million from tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal
standard. Data are presented as follows: multiplicity (s = singlet; d = doublet; t = triplet;
dd = doublet of doublet; m = multiplet; and b = broad), coupling constant (Hz), integration,
and assignment. High-Resolution Mass Spectroscopy (HRMS) was performed on a Maxis
Bruker UHR-Q-TOF spectrometer. Chromatographic analyses were conducted on a 1220
Infinity II LC system (Agilent Technologies, Les Ulis, France) equipped with the Infinity II
Diode Array Detector (DAD). The mobile phase composition consisted of H₂O + HCOOH
0.1% (solvent A) and CH₃CN + HCOOH 0.1% (solvent B), and it was used according
to the following elution gradient: 0–14 min, 90% A; 14–16 min, 40% A; 16–21 min, 0%
A; and 21–25 min, 90% A. Semi-preparative HPLC purification was carried out on the
previously described HPLC system, using the same buffer composition [17]. A Zorbax
Eclipse XDB-C18 column (9.4 × 150 mm, 5 µ, Agilent Technologies Les Ulis, France) was
employed at a flow rate of 2 mL/min, and the diode-array detector at 326 nm.

**3.2. *Enzymatic Thioglycosylation*

General Procedure 1: As previously described in the literature [17,18], *p*-nitrophenyl-Δ-
glucopyranoside (1.0 equiv., 50 mg, 10 mM) was dissolved in 25 mM citric acid/Na₂HPO₄
pH 6.0 buffer. Subsequently, 7-mercapto-4-methylcoumarin (2.5 equiv.), DTT (10 equiv.),
MeOH (10–50%), and the thioglycoligase mutant (0.4–2.0 nM as final concentration) were
added, and the mixture was left stirring at 37 °C overnight. The reaction was terminated by
adding 50% of a quenching solution (CH₃CN/HCOOH—10:1) and centrifuged at 12,000 × g
for 10 min to eliminate precipitated proteins. The supernatant was collected, concentrated
under reduced pressure, and purified by semi-preparative HPLC.

4-Methylumbellifer-7-yl 1-thio-β-D-glucopyranosiduronic acid (S-1) [17,51,52] was ob-
tained using *p*-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranosiduronic acid (0.16 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and the
corresponding thioglycoligase DtGlcAE396Q (13.8 nmol, 8.6 × 10⁻⁵ equiv.) [17], according
to General Procedure 1. The desired compound was obtained after purification as a white solid (32 mg, 54%).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 7.67 (d, *J* = 8.4 Hz, 1H, H-5); 7.49-7.33 (m, 2H, H-6, H-8); 6.35 (bs, 1H, H-3); 4.97 (d, *J* = 9.8 Hz, 1H, H-1'); 3.75 (d, *J* = 8.5 Hz, H-5'); 3.40-3.24 (m, 2H, H-3', H-4'); 3.15 (bt, *J* = 8.7 Hz, 1H, H-2'); 2.42 (s, 3H, -CH₃). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 172.2 (1C, C-6'), 160.1 (1C, C-2), 153.6 (1C, C-4a), 153.5 (1C, C-8a), 141.1 (1C, C-4), 125.9 (1C, C-5), 124.7 (1C, C-6), 118.0 (1C, C-7), 115.8 (1C, C-8), 114.0 (1C, C-3), 86.2 (1C, C-1'), 79.0 (1C, C-5'), 78.1 (1C, C-4'), 72.6 (1C, C-2'), 72.0 (1C, C-3'), 18.5 (-CH₃). HMRS (*m/z*) [M - H]⁻ calculated for C₁₆H₁₇O₈S 369.0638; found: 369.0637. [α]₂₀D = -125.0° (*c* = 0.20 in MeOH).

4-Methylumbellifer-7-yl 1-thio-β-D-xylopyranoside (S-2) was obtained using *p*-nitrophenyl-β-D-xylopyranoside (0.18 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and the corresponding thioglycoligase DtXylE161Q (7.6 nmol, 4.2 × 10⁻⁵ equiv.) [16], according to General Procedure 1. The desired compound was obtained after purification as a white powder (43 mg, 72%).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 7.70 (d, *J* = 8.3 Hz, 1H, H-5); 7.40-7.31 (m, 2H, H-8, H-6); 6.35 (s, 1H, H-3); 4.97 (d, *J* = 9.1 Hz, 1H, H-1'); 3.83 (dd, *J*₁ = 10.5 Hz, *J*₂ = 4.4 Hz, 1H, Hₐ-5'); 3.33-3.21 (m, 3H, H-3', H-4', Hb-5'); 3.16 (bt, *J* = 8.6 Hz, 1H, H-2'); 2.42 (s, 3H, -CH₃). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 160.1 (1C, C-2), 153.5 (2C, C-4a, C-8a), 141.1 (1C, C-4), 126.0 (1C, C-5), 124.7 (1C, C-6), 118.0 (1C, C-7), 115.7 (1C, C-8), 114.0 (1C, C-3), 86.7 (1C, C-1'), 77.9 (1C, C-3'), 72.8 (1C, C-2'), 69.7 (1C, C-4'), 69.4 (1C, C-5'), 18.5 (1C, -CH₃). HMRS (*m/z*) [M + H]⁻ calculated for C₁₅H₁₇O₆S 325.0740; found: 325.0743. [α]₂₀D = -35.4° (*c* = 0.20 in CHCl₃).

4-Methylumbellifer-7-yl 1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside (S-3) [19,53–55] was obtained using *p*-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (0.17 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and the corresponding thioglycoligase DtGlyE159Q (20.7 nmol, 12.2 × 10⁻⁵ equiv.) [4,18], according to General Procedure 1. The desired compound was obtained as white powder (37 mg, 63%).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 7.68 (d, *J* = 8.3 Hz, 1H, H-5); 7.42-7.29 (m, 2H, H-6, H-8); 6.29 (bd, *J* = 1.3 Hz, 1H, H-3); 4.80 (d, *J* = 9.7 Hz, 1H, H-1'); 3.72 (bd, *J* = 11.5 Hz, 1H, Hₐ-6'); 3.50-3.31 (bd, *J* = 11.5 Hz, 1H, Hb-6'); 3.29-3.16 (m, 2H, H-3', H-5'); 3.15-2.96 (m, 2H, H-2', H-4'); 2.37 (s, 3H, -CH₃). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 159.6 (1C, C-2), 153.1 (1C, C-4a), 153.0 (1C, C-8a), 141.1 (1C, C-3), 125.4 (1C, C-5), 124.0 (1C, C-6), 117.3 (1C, C-7), 115.1 (1C, C-8), 113.4 (1C, C-4), 85.8 (1C, C-1'), 81.0 (1C, C-5'), 78.1 (1C, C-3'), 72.4 (1C, C-2'), 69.7 (1C, C-4'), 60.9 (1C, C-6'), 18.0 (-CH₃). HMRS (*m/z*) [M + H]⁻ calculated for C₁₆H₁₉O₇S 355.0846; found: 355.0846. [α]₂₀D = -78.5° (*c* = 0.30 in MeOH).

4-Methylumbellifer-7-yl 1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (S-4) [20] was obtained using *p*-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (0.17 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and the corresponding thioglycoligase DtGlyE159Q (20.7 nmol, 12.2 × 10⁻⁵ equiv.), according to General Procedure 1. The desired compound was obtained as white powder (32 mg, 55%).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 7.67 (d, *J* = 8.3 Hz, 1H, H-5); 7.44 (s, 1H, H-8); 7.37 (bd, *J* = 8.3 Hz, 1H, H-6); 6.33 (s, 1H, H-3); 4.80 (d, *J* = 9.6 Hz, 1H, H-1'); 3.69-3.67 (m, 1H, H-sugar); 3.56-3.41 (m, 5H, H-sugar); 3.36-3.29 (m, 4H, H-sugar); 2.42 (s, 3H, -CH₃). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 160.2 (1C, C-2), 153.6 (1C, C-4a), 153.5 (1C, C-8a), 142.0 (1C, C-3), 125.9 (1C, C-5), 124.0 (1C, C-6), 115.3 (1C, C-8), 113.8 (1C, C-3), 86.8 (1C, C-1'), 79.8 (1C, C-2'), 75.1 (1C, C-sugar), 69.5 (1C, C-sugar), 68.8 (1C, C-sugar), 61.0 (1C, C-6'), 18.5 (1C, -CH₃). HMRS (*m/z*) [M + Na]⁺ calculated for C₁₆H₁₈O₇S 377.0673; found: 377.0672. [α]₂₀D = -55.2° (*c* = 0.30 in CHCl₃).

4-Methylumbellifer-7-yl 1-thio-β-D-fucopyranoside (S-5) was obtained using *p*-nitrophenyl-β-D-fucopyranoside (0.18 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and the corresponding DtGlyE159Q (23.2 nmol, 12.9 × 10⁻⁵ equiv.), according to General Procedure 1. The desired compound was obtained as white powder (40 mg, 68%).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 7.69 (d, *J* = 8.4 Hz, 1H, H-5); 7.41 (s, 1H, H-8); 7.36 (d, *J* = 8.4 Hz, 1H, H-6); 6.34 (s, 1H, H-3); 4.81 (d, *J* = 9.4 Hz, 1H, H-1'); 3.77 (q, *J* = 6.3 Hz, 1H, H-5'); 3.60-3.39 (m, 3H, H-3', H-4', H-2'); 2.42 (s, 3H, -CH₃); 1.15 (d, *J* = 6.3 Hz, -CH₃ sugar). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 125.9 (1C, C-5), 124.3 (1C, C-6), 115.2 (1C, C-8), 113.8 (1C,
C-3), 86.3 (1C, C-1'), 75.2 (1C, C-sugar), 74.6 (1C, C-5'), 71.7 (1C, C-sugar), 69.1 (1C, C-2'), 18.5 (1C, -CH₃), 17.3 (1C, -CH₃ sugar). HMRS (*m/z*) [M + H]⁻ calculated for C₁₆H₁₇O₆S 325.0740; found: 325.0743. [α]₂₀D = -93.4° (*c* = 0.20 in CHCl₃).

4-Methylumbellifer-7-yl 1-thio-α-D-galactopyranoside (S-6) was obtained using *p*-nitrophenyl-α-D-galactopyranoside (0.17 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and the corresponding DtαGal-D546A (32.8 nmol, 19.3 × 10⁻⁵ equiv.), according to General Procedure 1. The desired compound was obtained as white powder (37 mg, 63%).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 7.66 (d, *J* = 8.4 Hz, 1H, H-5); 7.49 (s, 1H, H-8); 7.42 (d, *J* = 8.4 Hz, 1H, H-6); 6.33 (s, 1H, H-3); 5.83 (d, *J* = 5.4 Hz, 1H, H-1'); 4.05 (dd, *J*₁ = 10.0 Hz, *J*₂ = 5.4 Hz, 1H, H-2'); 3.98 (t, *J* = 6.2 Hz, 1H, H-5'); 3.79 (bd, *J* = 3.2 Hz, 1H, H-4'); 3.56 (dd, *J*₁ = 10.9 Hz, *J*₂ = 6.2 Hz, 1H, H₃-6'); 3.39 (dd, *J*₁ = 10.9 Hz, *J*₂ = 6.2, H₃-6'); 2.41 (s, 3H, -CH₃). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 160.2 (1C, C-2), 153.6 (1C, C-4a), 153.5 (1C, C-8a), 142.2 (1C, C-4), 125.7 (1C, C-5), 125.6 (1C, C-6), 117.8 (1C, C-7), 116.6 (1C, C-8), 113.9 (1C, C-3), 88.7 (1C, C-1'), 73.4 (1C, C-5'), 71.1 (1C, C-3'), 68.7 (1C, C-4'), 68.3 (1C, C-2'), 60.6 (1C, C-6), 18.5 (1C, -CH₃). HMRS (*m/z*) [M + H]⁻ calculated for C₁₆H₁₉O₇S 355.0846; found: 355.0842. [α]₂₀D = +190.7° (*c* = 0.30 in CHCl₃).

### 3.3. Protein Expression and Production

Production and purification of the thioglycoligase mutants were performed as previously described by Guillotin et al. [6]. Briefly, *Escherichia coli* Rosetta (DE3), transformed with expression plasmid containing thioglycoligase coding genes, were grown in LB medium, supplemented with the corresponding antibiotics, Chloramphenicol (34 µg/mL) and Kanamycin (30 µg/mL), at 37 °C until OD₆₀₀ reached 0.4–0.6. Induction was then performed by adding 1 mM IPTG, and the culture was incubated overnight at 25 °C, while shaking at 220 rpm. Cells were harvested, lysed by freeze–thaw cycles, and sonicated. The supernatant was clarified by heating at 70 °C for 15 min, before centrifugation. Finally, the lysate was loaded onto a Ni²⁺-NTA column (HisPure, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and purified by elution with buffer containing 500 mM imidazole. The concentration of the various fractions collected was determined by Bradford assay [56].

### 3.4. Cellular Assays

Cell proliferation of five distinct cell lines was evaluated using the colorimetric MTT (thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide, Sigma) assay. Human keratinocyte normal skin HaCaT was cultivated in DMEM supplemented with 4.5 g/L glucose, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 10% FBS. Cancer cell lines and their respective growth media were obtained from CLS Cell Line Service GmbH (Eppelheim, Germany). Specifically, human skin melanoma SK-MEL-28 and human brain glioma HS683 were cultivated in DMEM with identical supplements as HaCaT cells. The human lung carcinoma cell line A-549 was grown in DMEM/Ham's F12 (1:1) medium supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine and 5% FBS. Additionally, human breast adenoma carcinoma MCF-7 cells were sustained in EMEM supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, sodium pyruvate, non-essential amino acids (NEAAs), 10 µg/mL insulin human, and 10% FBS. The MTT assay relies on the reduction of the yellow product thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) to formazan, a purple-blue product, by mitochondrial dehydrogenases in metabolically active cells. The number of living cells after incubation in the presence (or absence, control) of the tested molecules is directly proportional to the blue color, which was measured by spectrophotometry. To perform the assay, cells were initially seeded at a density of 2500 cells/mL in 96-well culture plates (Nunc™ Edge 2.0, Fisher) and allowed to adhere and proliferate over a 24-hour incubation period. Following this, the cells were treated with various concentrations of the tested compounds, which were previously prepared as serial dilutions and dissolved in 0.1% DMSO. These stable solutions guarantee the consistency of experimental conditions over extended periods. Each concentration of the tested compounds underwent triplicate testing (*n* = 3), and cells were subsequently incubated for 72 h to allow for thorough evaluation. Following this incubation period, MTT reagent (5 mg/mL solution in PBS) was introduced to each
well (10% v/v), and cells were further incubated for 4 h. Then, the culture medium was carefully removed, and the resulting blue formazan crystals were dissolved in 100 µL of 100% DMSO. Absorbance readings were taken at 540 nm, referencing a wavelength of 620 nm, using a spectrophotometer. In determining the IC₅₀, the absorbance of serial dilutions of each cell line, treated under identical conditions but without the presence of the tested compounds, was measured. This procedure facilitated the construction of a standard curve, from which the IC₅₀ value, denoting the concentration at which cell growth is reduced by 50%, was determined.

### 3.5. Optical Spectroscopy

Both absorbance and fluorescence spectra were measured on a Tecan INFINITE M PLEX 200 Pro plate reader equipped with monochromator allowing a scan from 230 to 1000 nm. All synthesized molecules were initially dissolved in 10 mM DMF and subsequently diluted in freshly prepared PBS (pH = 7.4) to achieve a final concentration of 0.1 mM. The solutions were then transferred to a Corning (Corning, NY, USA) UV-transparent 96-well plate. Absorbance spectra were recorded from 230 to 800 nm. Emission fluorescence spectra were recorded from 320 to 800 nm, under excitation at 280 nm. Excitation fluorescence spectra were recorded from 230 to 380 nm for an emission at 420 nm. All spectra were recorded with a wavelength step size of 2 nm. Data processing was performed with Excel software 2016. Fluorescence spectra are presented as normalized spectra ranging from 0 to 1. The relative quantum yields were calculated according to Equation (1) [57]:

$$ \Phi_T = (A_R/A_T) \times (F_T/F_R) \times (n_T/n_R) \times \Phi_R \quad (1) $$

where Φ is the fluorescence quantum yield, A is the absorbance at the excitation wavelength, F is the area under the corrected emission curve, and n is the refractive index of the solvent for the test compound (T) and the reference (R). The 4-MUB value in DMF was used as the reference [50]. The LOD (resp. LOQ) values were determined as the minimal concentration of product **S-3** required to yield a fluorescence that was twice greater than (respectively, 5-times that of) the fluorescence noise on a sample containing PBS, using an excitation wavelength of 280 nm and an emission wavelength of 386 nm (Figure S44).

### 4. Conclusions

In summary, this study highlights the proficiency of mutated GHs in catalyzing the thiolation reaction between activated sugar substrates and **7-MC**, leading to the efficient synthesis of S-glycosides. This enzymatic approach circumvents the need for laborious protection/deprotection protocols and purification steps commonly encountered in chemical synthesis, thereby offering a more efficient and convenient method for obtaining S-glycosides with intended configurations and in an eco-responsible way. The synthesized derivatives were produced in good yields, displaying the efficiency and versatility of the biocatalytic approach. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity assays conducted on multiple cancer cell lines, alongside a healthy cell line, revealed promising non-cytotoxic activities for most S-derivatives. These findings suggest their potential utility as chemical probes in a cellular context, with the carbohydrate moiety increasing the solubility of the aglycon and owing targeting of specific lectins [17,18]. Moreover, fluorescence studies revealed a dramatic increase in emission for S-glycosides compared to **7-MC**, indicating potential applications in fluorescence-based assays and imaging techniques. This fluorescence enhancement paves the way for the development of sensitive detection methods and imaging probes. Overall, these results emphasize the utility of enzymatic synthesis in producing bioactive S-derivatives and offer valuable insights into their cytotoxic and fluorescence properties.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29061322/s1, Figures S1–S18: HPLC/UV chromatograms of substrates, reaction mixture, and purified **S-1-to-S-6** products; Figures S19–S24: HRMS spectra of purified **S-1** to **S-6**; Figures S25–S27: ¹H and ¹³C NMR of undescribed compounds **S-2**, **S-5**, and **S-6**;
Figures S28–S43: Absorption spectra and emission and excitation fluorescence spectra of compounds **4-MUB**, **7-MC**, and products **S-1** to **S-6**; Figure S44: LOD and LOQ determination for compound **S-3**.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, N.B., R.D. and P.L.; methodology, N.B. and P.L.; investigation, A.P., G.C. and N.B.; resources, A.P. and G.C.; data curation, N.B. and P.L.; writing—original draft preparation, N.B.; writing—review and editing, N.B., P.L. and R.D.; supervision, P.L. and R.D.; project administration, P.L. and R.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** N.B., A.P. and P.L. acknowledge financial support from the projects CChemBio (FEDER-FSE 2014-2020-EX003677); Valbiocosm (FEDER-FSE 2014-2020-EX003202); Techsab (FEDER-FSE 2014-2020-EX011313); QUALICHIM (APR-IA-PF 2021-00149467); the RTR Motivhealth (2019-00131403); and the Labex programs SYNORG (ANR-11-LABX-0029) and IRON (ANR-11-LABX-0018-01) for their financial support of ICOA, UMR 7311, University of Orléans, CNRS. N.B., A.P. and P.L. also thank the SALSA platform for analyses (NMR, HRMS). G.C. and R.D. gratefully acknowledge support from Orléans Métropole.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

## References

1. Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, Q.; Xing, D.; Zhang, R. Exploring Carbohydrates for Therapeutics: A Review on Future Directions. *Front. Pharmacol.* **2021**, *12*, 756724. [CrossRef]

2. Jiang, H.; Qin, X.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Q.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, C.; Zhang, T.; Xing, D.; et al. Application of Carbohydrates in Approved Small Molecule Drugs: A Review. *Eur. J. Med. Chem.* **2021**, *223*, 113633. [CrossRef]

3. Fernández-Tejada, A.; Cañada, F.J.; Jiménez-Barbero, J. Recent Developments in Synthetic Carbohydrate-Based Diagnostics, Vaccines, and Therapeutics. *Chem. Eur. J.* **2015**, *21*, 10616–10628. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Guillotin, L.; Assaf, Z.; Pistorio, S.G.; Lafite, P.; Demchenko, A.V.; Daniellou, R. Hydrolysis of Glycosyl Thioimidates by Glycoside Hydrolase Requires Remote Activation for Efficient Activity. *Catalysts* **2019**, *9*, 826. [CrossRef]

5. Driguez, H. Thiooligosaccharides as Tools for Structural Biology. *ChemBioChem* **2001**, *2*, 311–318. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Rich, J.R.; Bundle, D.R. S-Linked Ganglioside Analogues for Use in Conjugate Vaccines. *Org. Lett.* **2004**, *6*, 897–900. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7. Liang, C.-F.; Yan, M.-C.; Chang, T.-C.; Lin, C.-C. Synthesis of S-Linked α(2→9) Octasialic Acid via Exclusive α S-Glycosidic Bond Formation. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2009**, *131*, 3138–3139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8. Wardrop, D.J.; Waidyarachchi, S.L. Synthesis and Biological Activity of Naturally Occurring α-Glucosidase Inhibitors. *Nat. Prod. Rep.* **2010**, *27*, 1431–1468. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9. Patil, P.R.; Kartha, K.P.R. Solvent-Free Synthesis of Thioglycosides by Ball Milling. *Green Chem.* **2009**, *11*, 953–956. [CrossRef]

10. Escopy, S.; Singh, Y.; Demchenko, A.V. Triflic Acid-Mediated Synthesis of Thioglycosides. *Org. Biomol. Chem.* **2019**, *17*, 8379–8383. [CrossRef]

11. Brachet, E.; Brion, J.-D.; Alami, M.; Messaoudi, S. Nickel-Catalyzed Arylation, Alkenylation, and Alkynylation of Unprotected Thioglycosides at Room Temperature. *Chem. Eur. J.* **2013**, *19*, 15276–15280. [CrossRef]

12. Bruneau, A.; Roche, M.; Hamze, A.; Brion, J.-D.; Alami, M.; Messaoudi, S. Stereoretentive Palladium-Catalyzed Arylation, Alkenylation, and Alkynylation of 1-Thiosugars and Thiols Using Aminobiphenyl Palladacycle Precatalyst at Room Temperature. *Chem. Eur. J.* **2015**, *21*, 8375–8379. [CrossRef]

13. Ibrahim, N.; Alami, M.; Messaoudi, S. Recent Advances in Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Functionalization of 1-Thiosugars. *Asian J. Org. Chem.* **2018**, *7*, 2026–2038. [CrossRef]

14. Sheldon, R.A.; Woodley, J.M. Role of Biocatalysis in Sustainable Chemistry. *Chem. Rev.* **2018**, *118*, 801–838. [CrossRef]

15. Jahn, M.; Marles, J.; Warren, R.A.J.; Withers, S.G. Thioglycoligases: Mutant Glycosidases for Thioglycoside Synthesis. *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2003**, *42*, 352–354. [CrossRef]

16. Bretagne, D.; Pâris, A.; de Vaumas, R.; Lafite, P.; Daniellou, R. Crystal Structure of *Dictyoglomus thermophilum* β-d-Xylosidase DtXyl Unravels the Structural Determinants for Efficient Notoginsenoside R1 Hydrolysis. *Biochimie* **2021**, *181*, 34–41. [CrossRef]

17. Kurdziel, M.; Kopeć, M.; Pâris, A.; Lewiński, K.; Lafite, P.; Daniellou, R. Thioglycoligation of Aromatic Thiols Using a Natural Glucuronide Donor. *Org. Biomol. Chem.* **2020**, *18*, 5582–5585. [CrossRef]

18. Peyrot, C.; Didak, B.; Guillotin, L.; Landemarre, L.; Lafite, P.; Lemiègre, L.; Daniellou, R. Enzymatic Synthesis of a Series of Thioglycosides: Analogs of Arbutin with Efficient Antipigmentation Properties. *Eur. J. Org. Chem.* **2021**, 3812–3818. [CrossRef]
19. Chiu, H.-H.; Shen, M.-Y.; Liu, Y.-T.; Fu, Y.-L.; Chiu, Y.-A.; Chen, Y.-H.; Huang, C.; Li, Y.-K. Diversity of Sugar Acceptor of Glycosyltransferase 1 from *Bacillus cereus* and Its Application for Glucoside Synthesis. *Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.* **2016**, *100*, 4459–4471. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20. Rodrigue, J.; Ganne, G.; Blanchard, B.; Saucier, C.; Giguère, D.; Shiao, T.C.; Varrot, A.; Imberty, A.; Roy, R. Aromatic Thioglycoside Inhibitors against the Virulence Factor LecA from *Pseudomonas Aeruginosa*. *Org. Biomol. Chem.* **2013**, *11*, 6906–6918. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

21. El-Sawy, E.R.; Abdelwahab, A.B.; Kirsch, G. Insight on Mercapto-Coumarins: Synthesis and Reactivity. *Molecules* **2022**, *27*, 2150. [CrossRef]

22. Ibis, C.; Sahinler Ayla, S.; Bahar, H.; Stasevych, M.; Komarovska-Porokhnyavets, O.; Novikov, V. Synthesis, Characterization, and Biological Properties of Novel Piperidinolyl-, Piperidinyl-, and Piperazinyl-Substituted Naphthoquinone Compounds and Their Reactions With Some Thiols. *Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem.* **2014**, *190*, 1422–1433. [CrossRef]

23. Ibis, C.; Ayla, S.S.; Ozkok, F.; Bahar, H. Synthesis of New Piperazinyl and Piperidinolyl Substituted P-Chloranil Derivatives and Their Reactions with Thiols. *Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem.* **2015**, *190*, 2273–2282. [CrossRef]

24. Feng, C.-H.; Lu, C.-Y. A New Matrix for Analyzing Low Molecular Mass Compounds and Its Application for Determination of Carcinogenic Areca Alkaloids by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. *Anal. Chim. Acta* **2009**, *649*, 230–235. [CrossRef]

25. Koktan, J.; Královec, K.; Havelek, R.; Kuličková, J.; Řezanka, P.; Kaman, O. Magnetic Oxide Particles with Gold Nanoshells: Synthesis, Properties and Cytotoxic Effects. *Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.* **2017**, *520*, 922–932. [CrossRef]

26. González-Béjar, M.; Frenette, M.; Jorge, L.; Scaiano, J.C. 7-Mercapto-4-Methylcoumarin as a Reporter of Thiol Binding to the CdSe Quantum Dot Surface. *Chem. Commun.* **2009**, *22*, 3202–3204. [CrossRef]

27. Taglietti, A.; Diaz Fernandez, Y.A.; Galinetto, P.; Grisoli, P.; Milanese, C.; Pallavicini, P. Mixing Thiols on the Surface of Silver Nanoparticles: Preserving Antibacterial Properties While Introducing SERS Activity. *J. Nanoparticle Res.* **2013**, *15*, 2047. [CrossRef]

28. Kamil Reza, K.; Wang, J.; Vaidyanathan, R.; Dey, S.; Wang, Y.; Trau, M. Electrohydrodynamic-Induced SERS Immunoassay for Extensive Multiplexed Biomarker Sensing. *Small* **2017**, *13*, 1602902. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

29. Bassi, B.; Taglietti, A.; Galinetto, P.; Marchesi, N.; Pascale, A.; Cabrini, E.; Pallavicini, P.; Dacarro, G. Tunable Coating of Gold Nanostars: Tailoring Robust SERS Labels for Cell Imaging. *Nanotechnology* **2016**, *27*, 265302. [CrossRef]

30. Bard, A.; Rondon, R.; Marquez, D.T.; Lanterna, A.E.; Scaiano, J.C. How Fast Can Thiols Bind to the Gold Nanoparticle Surface? *Photochem. Photobiol.* **2018**, *94*, 1109–1115. [CrossRef]

31. Reddy, K.R.; El-Zein, A.; Airey, D.W.; Alonso-Marroquin, F.; Schubel, P.; Manalo, A. Self-Healing Polymers: Synthesis Methods and Applications. *Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects* **2020**, *23*, 100500. [CrossRef]

32. Gulyuz, S.; Bayram, D.; Ozkose, U.U.; Bolat, Z.B.; Kocak, P.; Saka, O.M.; Devrim, B.; Parlak Khalily, M.; Telci, D.; Sahin, F.; et al. Synthesis, Biocompatibility and Gene Encapsulation of Poly(2-Ethyl 2-Oxazoline)-Dioleoyl Phosphatidylethanolamine (PEtOx-DOPE) and Post-Modifications with Peptides and Fluorescent Dye Coumarin. *Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater.* **2021**, *70*, 981–993. [CrossRef]

33. Gospodova, T.; Rashkova, J.; Ivanova, D.; Viteva, L.; Duprat, C.; Mazières, M.-R.; Bakalova, S.; Kaneti, J. Synthetic Potentials of Heptamethine Merocyanine Dyes Containing an Active Chlorine Atom: Reactivity towards Nucleophiles. *Eur. J. Org. Chem.* **2009**, 2009, 5063–5071. [CrossRef]

34. Cara, E.; Mandrile, L.; Sacco, A.; Giovannozzi, A.M.; Rossi, A.M.; Celegato, F.; Leo, N.D.; Hönicke, P.; Kayser, Y.; Beckhoff, B.; et al. Towards a Traceable Enhancement Factor in Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. *J. Mater. Chem. C* **2020**, *8*, 16513–16519. [CrossRef]

35. Galardon, E.; Tomas, A.; Roussel, P.; Artaud, I. New Fluorescent Zinc Complexes: Towards Specific Sensors for Hydrogen Sulfide in Solution. *Dalton Trans.* **2009**, *42*, 9126–9130. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

36. Varandas, P.A.M.M.; Cobb, A.J.A.; Segundo, M.A.; Silva, E.M.P. Emergent Glycerophospholipid Fluorescent Probes: Synthesis and Applications. *Bioconjugate Chem.* **2020**, *31*, 417–435. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

37. Ge, C.; Wang, H.; Zhang, B.; Yao, J.; Li, X.; Feng, W.; Zhou, P.; Wang, Y.; Fang, J. A Thiol–Thiosulfonate Reaction Providing a Novel Strategy for Turn-on Thiol Sensing. *Chem. Commun.* **2015**, *51*, 14913–14916. [CrossRef]

38. Barr, B.K.; Holewinski, R.J. 4-Methyl-7-Thioumbelliferyl-β-d-Cellobioside: A Fluorescent, Nonhydrolyzable Substrate Analogue for Cellulases. *Biochemistry* **2002**, *41*, 4447–4452. [CrossRef]

39. Tanaka, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Noguchi, M.; Kobayashi, A.; Shoda, S. Direct Transformation of Unprotected Sugars to Aryl 1-Thio-β-Glycosides in Aqueous Media Using 2-Chloro-1,3-Dimethylimidazolinium Chloride. *Chem. Lett.* **2009**, *38*, 458–459. [CrossRef]

40. Katayama, H.; Asahina, Y.; Hojo, H. Chemical Synthesis of the S-Linked Glycopeptide, Sublancin. *J. Pept. Sci.* **2011**, *17*, 818–821. [CrossRef]

41. Venkateswarlu, C.; Gautam, V.; Chandrasekaran, S. Useful Approach to the Synthesis of Aryl Thio- and Selenoglycosides in the Presence of Rongalite. *Carbohydr. Res.* **2014**, *396*, 48–53. [CrossRef]

42. Ardourel, M.; Felgerolle, C.; Pâris, A.; Acar, N.; Ramchani Ben Othman, K.; Ueda, N.; Rossignol, R.; Bazinet, A.; Hébert, B.; Briault, S.; et al. Dietary Supplement Enriched in Antioxidants and Omega-3 Promotes Glutamine Synthesis in Müller Cells: A Key Process against Oxidative Stress in Retina. *Nutrients* **2021**, *13*, 3216. [CrossRef]
43. Holze, C.; Michaudel, C.; Mackowiak, C.; Haas, D.A.; Benda, C.; Hubel, P.; Pennemann, F.L.; Schnepf, D.; Wettmarshausen, J.; Braun, M.; et al. Oxeiptosis, a ROS-Induced Caspase-Independent Apoptosis-like Cell-Death Pathway. *Nat. Immunol.* **2018**, *19*, 130–140. [CrossRef]

44. Ourhzif, E.-M.; Pâris, A.; Abrunhosa-Thomas, I.; Ketatni, E.M.; Chalard, P.; Khouili, M.; Daniellou, R.; Troin, Y.; Akssira, M. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Cytotoxic Activities of Arylnaphthalene Lignans and Aza-Analogs. *Arch. Der Pharm.* **2021**, *354*, 2000479. [CrossRef]

45. Cox, D.; O'Kennedy, R.; Thornes, R.D. The Rarity of Liver Toxicity in Patients Treated with Coumarin (1, 2-Benzopyrone). *Hum. Toxicol.* **1989**, *8*, 501–506. [CrossRef]

46. Elinos-Báez, C.M.; León, F.; Santos, E. Effects of Coumarin and 7OH-Coumarin on Bcl-2 and Bax Expression in Two Human Lung Cancer Cell Lines in Vitro. *Cell Biol. Int.* **2005**, *29*, 703–708. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

47. Saidu, N.E.B.; Valente, S.; Bana, E.; Kirsch, G.; Bagrel, D.; Montenarh, M. Coumarin Polysulfides Inhibit Cell Growth and Induce Apoptosis in HCT116 Colon Cancer Cells. *Bioorganic Med. Chem.* **2012**, *20*, 1584–1593. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

48. Abu-Eittah, R.H.; El-Tawil, B.A.H. The Electronic Absorption Spectra of Some Coumarins. A Molecular Orbital Treatment. *Can. J. Chem.* **1985**, *63*, 1173–1179. [CrossRef]

49. Lanterna, A.E.; González-Béjar, M.; Frenette, M.; Scaiano, J.C. Photophysics of 7-Mercapto-4-Methylcoumarin and Derivatives: Complementary Fluorescence Behaviour to 7-Hydroxycoumarins. *Photochem. Photobiol. Sci.* **2017**, *16*, 1284–1289. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

50. Abdel-Mottaleb, M.S.A.; El-Sayed, B.A.; Abo-Aly, M.M.; El-Kady, M.Y. Fluorescence-Properties and Excited State Interactions of 7-Hydroxy-4-Methylcoumarin Laser Dye. *J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem.* **1989**, *46*, 379–390. [CrossRef]

51. Nasseri, S.A.; Betschart, L.; Opaleva, D.; Rahfeld, P.; Withers, S.G. A Mechanism-Based Approach to Screening Metagenomic Libraries for Discovery of Unconventional Glycosidases. *Angew. Chem.* **2018**, *130*, 11529–11534. [CrossRef]

52. Buchheit, D.; Schmitt, E.I.; Bischoff, D.; Ebner, T.; Bureik, M. S-Glucuronidation of 7-Mercapto-4-Methylcoumarin by Human UDP Glycosyltransferases in Genetically Engineered Fission Yeast Cells. *Biol. Chem.* **2011**, *392*, 1089–1095. [CrossRef]

53. Li, S.-S.; Xu, W.; Lin, F.-L.; Wang, Q.-Q.; Jiang, R.-W. Efficient Glycosylation of Coumarin by Plant Glycosyltransferase UGT74AN3. *World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.* **2021**, *10*, 1959–1967. [CrossRef]

54. Yoshida, N.; Fujieda, T.; Kobayashi, A.; Ishihara, M.; Noguchi, M.; Shoda, S. Direct Introduction of Detachable Fluorescent Tag into Oligosaccharides. *Chem. Lett.* **2013**, *42*, 1038–1039. [CrossRef]

55. Huang, W.; He, Y.; Jiang, R.; Deng, Z.; Long, F. Functional and Structural Dissection of a Plant Steroid 3-O-Glycosyltransferase Facilitated the Engineering Enhancement of Sugar Donor Promiscuity. *ACS Catal.* **2022**, *12*, 2927–2937. [CrossRef]

56. Bradford, M.M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. *Anal. Biochem.* **1976**, *72*, 248–254. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

57. Fery-Forgues, S.; Lavabre, D. Are Fluorescence Quantum Yields So Tricky to Measure? A Demonstration Using Familiar Stationery Products. *J. Chem. Educ.* **1999**, *76*, 1260–1264. [CrossRef]

**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.