# Île Dumet (Armorican Massif, France) and its glaucophane eclogites: the little sister of Île de Groix

Gaston Godard, David C. Smith, Damien Jaujard, Sidali Doukkari

► To cite this version:

Gaston Godard, David C. Smith, Damien Jaujard, Sidali Doukkari. Île Dumet (Armorican Massif, France) and its glaucophane eclogites: the little sister of Île de Groix. European Journal of Mineralogy, 2024, 36, pp.99-122. 10.5194/ejm-36-99-2024. insu-04462215

HAL Id: insu-04462215

https://insu.hal.science/insu-04462215

Submitted on 17 Feb 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Île Dumet (Armorican Massif, France) and its glaucophane eclogites: the little sister of Île de Groix

Gaston Godard, David C. Smith, Damien Jaujard, Sidali Doukkari

► To cite this version:

Gaston Godard, David C. Smith, Damien Jaujard, Sidali Doukkari. Île Dumet (Armorican Massif, France) and its glaucophane eclogites: the little sister of Île de Groix. European Journal of Mineralogy, 2024, 36, pp.99-122. 10.5194/ejm-36-99-2024. insu-04462215

HAL Id: insu-04462215

https://insu.hal.science/insu-04462215v1

Submitted on 17 Feb 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Île Dumet (Armorican Massif, France) and its glaucophane eclogites: the little sister of Île de Groix

Gaston Godard¹, David C. Smith²,*, Damien Jaujard³, and Sidali Doukkari⁴,⁵

¹Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Université Paris Cité,
1 rue Jussieu, 75238 Paris CEDEX 05, France

²1312 Chemin de la Sonnière, 38850 Villages du Lac de Paladru, France

³INSPE Créteil, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 1 rue Jean Macé, 94380 Bonneuil-sur-Marne, France

⁴Laboratoire de Géodynamique, Géologie de l'Ingénieur et de Planétologie, FSTGAT-USTHB, B.P. 32,
El Alia, Dar el Beïda, 16111 Algiers, Algeria

⁵Département SNV, Faculté des Sciences, Université d'Alger 1, 2 rue Didouche Mourad, Algiers, Algeria

retired

Correspondence: Gaston Godard (godard@ipgp.fr)

Received: 31 July 2023 – Revised: 23 November 2023 – Accepted: 25 November 2023 – Published: 19 January 2024

**Abstract.** Blueschist-facies rocks are scarce within the Variscan orogen. Two main occurrences are known in the Armorican Massif (NW France), at Île de Groix and Bois-de-Céné. Another glaucophane occurrence was discovered in 1988 but went unnoticed; it is located on Île Dumet, an uninhabited island off the coast of southern Brittany, in the estuary of the river Vilaine. Orthogneiss occurs on the SW half of the island; the original granitoid magma had intruded mica schists on the NE half, where numerous 1 to 10 m long boudins of mafic rocks occur. These lenses are typically retrogressed into plagioclase-bearing amphibolite, but a few contain remnants of glaucophane-bearing eclogite, which also occurs as numerous loose blocks along the NE coast of the island, suggesting that the best-preserved eclogites lie in situ offshore in that direction.

The glaucophane eclogites contain garnet, omphacite, quartz, amphibole, clinozoisite/epidote, minor phengite, paragonite, rutile and rare apatite. Prograde metamorphic evolution is indicated by garnet crystals zoned from Mn-rich cores to Mg-richer rims (typically (core → rim): Alm$_{44}$→$_{58}$ Prp$_{1}$→$_{12}$ Grs$_{33}$→$_{29}$ Sps$_{22}$→$_{1}$) and amphibole grains with glaucophane nuclei and Ca-Na-amphibole overgrowths that show sharp transitions, supporting evolution through a solvus, as predicted by the thermodynamic modelling. Modelling of the *P*-*T* conditions using the *P*-*T* pseudosection technique indicates a peak of metamorphism at about 620 °C and 16 kbar. The retrograde evolution of the metabasites is evidenced by the late formation of albite, titanite and ferro-actinolite. The surrounding mica schists, composed of quartz, garnet, phengite, paragonite and chlorite, were also largely retrogressed during exhumation. The orthogneiss of the SW part of the island does not show clear evidence of high-pressure metamorphism, since the magmatic feldspars are still preserved, similarly to the orthogneiss of Les Sables Rouges on the island of Groix.

Île Dumet and the western part of the Vilaine estuary represent a blueschist-facies equivalent to Île de Groix (Brittany) and Bois-de-Céné (Vendée) on the mainland. All three occurrences occupy the centres of wide syn-forms whose concentric units are, from rims to core (i.e. from base to top), (a) a high-*T* migmatitic basement; (b) Cambro-Ordovician metasediments and acid metavolcanites (“porphyroids”); and (c) blueschist-facies mica schists and metabasites, serpentinites, and minor orthogneisses derived from a pre-Variscan oceanic accretionary prism. There are about 10 similar occurrences within the Ibero-Armoricán Arc, forming a discontinuous high-pressure belt, but most of them have remained unnoticed due to a high degree of retrogression.
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

# Île Dumet (Armorican Massif, France) and its glaucophane eclogites: the little sister of Île de Groix

Gaston Godard¹, David C. Smith²,*, Damien Jaujard³, and Sidali Doukkari⁴,⁵

¹Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Université Paris Cité,
1 rue Jussieu, 75238 Paris CEDEX 05, France

²1312 Chemin de la Sonnière, 38850 Villages du Lac de Paladru, France

³INSPE Créteil, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 1 rue Jean Macé, 94380 Bonneuil-sur-Marne, France

⁴Laboratoire de Géodynamique, Géologie de l'Ingénieur et de Planétologie, FSTGAT-USTHB, B.P. 32,
El Alia, Dar el Beïda, 16111 Algiers, Algeria

⁵Département SNV, Faculté des Sciences, Université d'Alger 1, 2 rue Didouche Mourad, Algiers, Algeria

retired

**Correspondence:** Gaston Godard (godard@ipgp.fr)

Received: 31 July 2023 – Revised: 23 November 2023 – Accepted: 25 November 2023 – Published: 19 January 2024

**Abstract.** Blueschist-facies rocks are scarce within the Variscan orogen. Two main occurrences are known in the Armorican Massif (NW France), at Île de Groix and Bois-de-Céné. Another glaucophane occurrence was discovered in 1988 but went unnoticed; it is located on Île Dumet, an uninhabited island off the coast of southern Brittany, in the estuary of the river Vilaine. Orthogneiss occurs on the SW half of the island; the original granitoid magma had intruded mica schists on the NE half, where numerous 1 to 10 m long boudins of mafic rocks occur. These lenses are typically retrogressed into plagioclase-bearing amphibolite, but a few contain remnants of glaucophane-bearing eclogite, which also occurs as numerous loose blocks along the NE coast of the island, suggesting that the best-preserved eclogites lie in situ offshore in that direction.

The glaucophane eclogites contain garnet, omphacite, quartz, amphibole, clinozoisite/epidote, minor phengite, paragonite, rutile and rare apatite. Prograde metamorphic evolution is indicated by garnet crystals zoned from Mn-rich cores to Mg-richer rims (typically (core → rim): Alm$_{44}$→$_{58}$ Prp$_{1}$→$_{12}$ Grs$_{33}$→$_{29}$ Sps$_{22}$→$_{1}$) and amphibole grains with glaucophane nuclei and Ca-Na-amphibole overgrowths that show sharp transitions, supporting evolution through a solvus, as predicted by the thermodynamic modelling. Modelling of the *P*-*T* conditions using the *P*-*T* pseudosection technique indicates a peak of metamorphism at about 620 °C and 16 kbar. The retrograde evolution of the metabasites is evidenced by the late formation of albite, titanite and ferro-actinolite. The surrounding mica schists, composed of quartz, garnet, phengite, paragonite and chlorite, were also largely retrogressed during exhumation. The orthogneiss of the SW part of the island does not show clear evidence of high-pressure metamorphism, since the magmatic feldspars are still preserved, similarly to the orthogneiss of Les Sables Rouges on the island of Groix.

Île Dumet and the western part of the Vilaine estuary represent a blueschist-facies equivalent to Île de Groix (Brittany) and Bois-de-Céné (Vendée) on the mainland. All three occurrences occupy the centres of wide syn-forms whose concentric units are, from rims to core (i.e. from base to top), (a) a high-*T* migmatitic basement; (b) Cambro-Ordovician metasediments and acid metavolcanites (“porphyroids”); and (c) blueschist-facies mica schists and metabasites, serpentinites, and minor orthogneisses derived from a pre-Variscan oceanic accretionary prism. There are about 10 similar occurrences within the Ibero-Armoricán Arc, forming a discontinuous high-pressure belt, but most of them have remained unnoticed due to a high degree of retrogression.
# 1 Introduction

At the western edge of the European Variscides, the South Armorican Domain (Armorican Massif, NW France; Fig. 1a, b) is part of the Ibero-Armoricán Arc, which has been interpreted as the result of a collision between the Laurussia and Gondwana continents during the Variscan orogeny (see reviews in Ballèvre et al., 2014; Díez Fernández et al., 2016; Martínez Catalán et al., 2020). In this context, blueschist-facies rocks most likely belong to a palaeo-subduction zone, highlighting the suture zone. However, glaucophane-bearing rocks are rare in the South Armorican Domain, where only two occurrences are known to date, at Île de Groix – a famous site that has been extensively studied since 1883 – and at Bois-de-Céné on the mainland (Fig. 1b). Another glaucophane occurrence was reported in 1988 on the 0.09 km² uninhabited island of Île Dumet. This small island is located off the coast of southern Brittany, about 65 km SE of Île de Groix and 60 km NW of Bois-de-Céné, almost at equal distance between these two occurrences (Fig. 1b, c). However, the Dumet finding went unnoticed because it was not taken into account in the geodynamic models of the Ibero-Armoricán Arc and was not even mentioned in the latest edition of the 1 : 1 000 000 geological map of France.

After a brief description of the general geology of Dumet Island, we propose a detailed mineralogical and petrological study of the rocks observed there, in particular the lenses of glaucophane-bearing eclogite and their surrounding phengite- and paragonite-bearing mica schists, whose metamorphic evolution is determined by modelling P-T pseudosections. Finally, we discuss the geological and geodynamic implications of this new occurrence, showing that similar occurrences of glaucophane-bearing rocks are more numerous in the Ibero-Armoricán Arc than previously thought.

# 2 Geological presentation of Dumet Island

Île Dumet is an uninhabited island of 8.5 ha located on the SW coast of the Armorican Massif, in western France (lat 47.412°, long -2.620°), off the estuary of the Vilaine River and about 6 km from the picturesque village of Piriac-sur-Mer (hereafter Piriac) on the mainland. Throughout history, the island has been intermittently inhabited since the Neolithic period (Levillayer and Moreau, 2019; Levillayer, 2020) and has also been occupied by the Saxons, Vikings, Spanish and English, as well as a few hermits. This turbulent history has fuelled several legends, including the existence of alleged treasure buried on the island (e.g. Delorme, 2020). In 1913, Alphonse Berget calculated that Dumet Island was the pole of the “continental hemisphere” that includes most of the Earth’s landmass (Berget, 1913; e.g. Affholder, 2002), and he therefore recommended the Dumet meridian as the reference for universal time, but, as we now know, the Greenwich meridian was preferred. In 1990, Dumet Island became

an ornithological reserve of the French Conservatoire du Littoral (Pierronnet, 1997), and its access is strictly regulated and in fact quite difficult.

## 2.1 Previous geological studies

The only buried treasure of Dumet Island is none other than its rocks, which have aroused the interest of ancient and modern geologists. Édouard Richer (1820-1823, vol. 2, p. 17) was the first to describe the island from a geological point of view. He observed gneisses, mica schists and especially some “grünstein” (green rock) with chlorite and “diallage” (i.e. clinopyroxene). However, only “gneiss” and “micaschist” appear on the first geological maps published in the 19th century. Later, Pic (1936) mentioned pebbles “in which one can find garnet, epidote, pyroxene, amphibole”.

It was in fact Claude Audren who carried out the first detailed geological study of Dumet Island, as part of a wider survey of the Vilaine estuary (Audren, 1974, 1987). In particular, he drew up a geological map of the island, distinguishing between an orthogneiss in the south and mica schists with amphibolite pods in the north. He sent five orthogneiss samples to Jean-Jacques Peucat for dating by the Rb-Sr method (419 ± 12 Ma: Peucat, 1983).

In the 1980s, Bernard Lasnier discovered glaucophane eclogite relics in the amphibolite pods. He published his findings in a monograph on the geology of Dumet Island (Baudouin et al., 1988), which remains the most complete source of information on the geology of the island but has been largely ignored because it was published in a regional periodical. Some electron-microprobe spot analyses of clinoamphiboles, including glaucophane, were carried out by Lasnier and Smith (1989) and Smith et al. (1999), who noted the analogy between Dumet and Groix islands. The evidence for a high-pressure (HP) metamorphism at Dumet Island was echoed in the leaflet of the geological map at 1/50 000 (Augier et al., 2010).

## 2.2 Geological overview

Although largely covered by Quaternary sediments (Dresch, 1964), the bedrock of Dumet Island is very well exposed on the foreshore, which is largely uncovered at low tide (Fig. 2). The island is geologically divided into two main parts (Figs. 1c, 2):

a. In the north, mica schists, alternating with some more quartzitic levels, contain many 1 to 10 m long lenses of metabasite mainly composed of amphibole, plagioclase and garnet, which are derived from rarely preserved glaucophane eclogite (Fig. 3a). The best-preserved eclogites are actually visible on the beach south-east of Fort de Ré (Figs. 1c, 2), in the form of many loose ovoid blocks that can reach 0.4 m in length, suggesting that the best glaucophane-eclogite in situ occurrences are at sea towards the north-east.
# 1 Introduction

At the western edge of the European Variscides, the South Armorican Domain (Armorican Massif, NW France; Fig. 1a, b) is part of the Ibero-Armoricán Arc, which has been interpreted as the result of a collision between the Laurussia and Gondwana continents during the Variscan orogeny (see reviews in Ballèvre et al., 2014; Díez Fernández et al., 2016; Martínez Catalán et al., 2020). In this context, blueschist-facies rocks most likely belong to a palaeo-subduction zone, highlighting the suture zone. However, glaucophane-bearing rocks are rare in the South Armorican Domain, where only two occurrences are known to date, at Île de Groix – a famous site that has been extensively studied since 1883 – and at Bois-de-Céné on the mainland (Fig. 1b). Another glaucophane occurrence was reported in 1988 on the 0.09 km² uninhabited island of Île Dumet. This small island is located off the coast of southern Brittany, about 65 km SE of Île de Groix and 60 km NW of Bois-de-Céné, almost at equal distance between these two occurrences (Fig. 1b, c). However, the Dumet finding went unnoticed because it was not taken into account in the geodynamic models of the Ibero-Armoricán Arc and was not even mentioned in the latest edition of the 1:1000 000 geological map of France.

After a brief description of the general geology of Dumet Island, we propose a detailed mineralogical and petrological study of the rocks observed there, in particular the lenses of glaucophane-bearing eclogite and their surrounding phengite- and paragonite-bearing mica schists, whose metamorphic evolution is determined by modelling P-T pseudosections. Finally, we discuss the geological and geodynamic implications of this new occurrence, showing that similar occurrences of glaucophane-bearing rocks are more numerous in the Ibero-Armoricán Arc than previously thought.

# 2 Geological presentation of Dumet Island

Île Dumet is an uninhabited island of 8.5 ha located on the SW coast of the Armorican Massif, in western France (lat 47.412°, long -2.620°), off the estuary of the Vilaine River and about 6 km from the picturesque village of Piriac-sur-Mer (hereafter Piriac) on the mainland. Throughout history, the island has been intermittently inhabited since the Neolithic period (Levillayer and Moreau, 2019; Levillayer, 2020) and has also been occupied by the Saxons, Vikings, Spanish and English, as well as a few hermits. This turbulent history has fuelled several legends, including the existence of alleged treasure buried on the island (e.g. Delorme, 2020). In 1913, Alphonse Berget calculated that Dumet Island was the pole of the “continental hemisphere” that includes most of the Earth’s landmass (Berget, 1913; e.g. Affholder, 2002), and he therefore recommended the Dumet meridian as the reference for universal time, but, as we now know, the Greenwich meridian was preferred. In 1990, Dumet Island became

an ornithological reserve of the French Conservatoire du Littoral (Pierronnet, 1997), and its access is strictly regulated and in fact quite difficult.

## 2.1 Previous geological studies

The only buried treasure of Dumet Island is none other than its rocks, which have aroused the interest of ancient and modern geologists. Édouard Richer (1820-1823, vol. 2, p. 17) was the first to describe the island from a geological point of view. He observed gneisses, mica schists and especially some “grünstein” (green rock) with chlorite and “diallage” (i.e. clinopyroxene). However, only “gneiss” and “micaschist” appear on the first geological maps published in the 19th century. Later, Pic (1936) mentioned pebbles “in which one can find garnet, epidote, pyroxene, amphibole”.

It was in fact Claude Audren who carried out the first detailed geological study of Dumet Island, as part of a wider survey of the Vilaine estuary (Audren, 1974, 1987). In particular, he drew up a geological map of the island, distinguishing between an orthogneiss in the south and mica schists with amphibolite pods in the north. He sent five orthogneiss samples to Jean-Jacques Peucat for dating by the Rb-Sr method (419 ± 12 Ma: Peucat, 1983).

In the 1980s, Bernard Lasnier discovered glaucophane eclogite relics in the amphibolite pods. He published his findings in a monograph on the geology of Dumet Island (Baudouin et al., 1988), which remains the most complete source of information on the geology of the island but has been largely ignored because it was published in a regional periodical. Some electron-microprobe spot analyses of clinoamphiboles, including glaucophane, were carried out by Lasnier and Smith (1989) and Smith et al. (1999), who noted the analogy between Dumet and Groix islands. The evidence for a high-pressure (HP) metamorphism at Dumet Island was echoed in the leaflet of the geological map at 1/50 000 (Augier et al., 2010).

## 2.2 Geological overview

Although largely covered by Quaternary sediments (Dresch, 1964), the bedrock of Dumet Island is very well exposed on the foreshore, which is largely uncovered at low tide (Fig. 2). The island is geologically divided into two main parts (Figs. 1c, 2):

a. In the north, mica schists, alternating with some more quartzitic levels, contain many 1 to 10 m long lenses of metabasite mainly composed of amphibole, plagioclase and garnet, which are derived from rarely preserved glaucophane eclogite (Fig. 3a). The best-preserved eclogites are actually visible on the beach south-east of Fort de Ré (Figs. 1c, 2), in the form of many loose ovoid blocks that can reach 0.4 m in length, suggesting that the best glaucophane-eclogite in situ occurrences are at sea towards the north-east.
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**Figure 1.** Structure and geological map of Île Dumet. (a) The Atlantic location of Dumet Island. (b) Dumet Island on the west coast of Armorica, south-east of Île de Groix (SASZ: South Armorican Shear Zone). (c) Geological map of Dumet Island. The thick black and blue lines represent the coastline at the highest and lowest tide levels, respectively; the foreshore as represented on the map corresponds to an ordinary low tide; the topographic background is modified after Yves Bodeur (in Baudouin et al., 1988). (d) Structural data of Île Dumet (partly from Audren, 1987). Equal-angle projection in the lower hemisphere. Filled symbols: poles of main foliation (orthogneiss, metabasites) and schistosity (mica schists). Open symbols: stretching lineation. Brown circles: orthogneiss; purple triangles: mica schists; green diamonds: metabasites; black squares: mean vectors; curve: cylindrical best fit of poles to main foliation/schistosity.

b. The southern part of the island consists mainly of acidic orthogneiss. It encloses on the west coast a large stretched enclave of mica schists with metabasite lenses (Fig. 1c), similar to what occurs on the northern part of the island; everywhere, the immediate host rock of the metabasite pods is mica schist, never orthogneiss. This orthogneiss also locally shows narrow apophyses and veins intensely stretched within the mica schists, parallel to the main foliation (Figs. 1c, 3b); the largest of these veins, about 10 metres thick, crosses the island below the former sheep barn (bergerie) with a strike of 114° (Figs. 1c, 2), whilst other metre-thick veins are visible here and there in the mica schists (e.g. Fig. 3b). These observations suggest that the magmatic protolith

has intruded the mica schists before being intensely deformed. Within a zone a few metres thick near the contact with the mica schists, this orthogneiss appears to be more leucocratic, being enriched in white mica.

The EW-oriented S-dipping foliation in the orthogneiss is essentially parallel to the main schistosity in the mica schists, and so are the less pronounced E-dipping stretching lineations (Fig. 1d). At the island scale, these foliation and schistosity planes, termed S₂ by Audren (1987), are slightly dispersed around an axis parallel to the stretching lineation L₂ (the best cylindrical fit of the S₂ poles is approximately perpendicular to L₂; Fig. 1d). Audren (1987) observed early structures in mica schists, in particular an early schistosity
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Figure 1.** Structure and geological map of Île Dumet. (a) The Atlantic location of Dumet Island. (b) Dumet Island on the west coast of Armorica, south-east of Île de Groix (SASZ: South Armorican Shear Zone). (c) Geological map of Dumet Island. The thick black and blue lines represent the coastline at the highest and lowest tide levels, respectively; the foreshore as represented on the map corresponds to an ordinary low tide; the topographic background is modified after Yves Bodeur (in Baudouin et al., 1988). (d) Structural data of Île Dumet (partly from Audren, 1987). Equal-angle projection in the lower hemisphere. Filled symbols: poles of main foliation (orthogneiss, metabasites) and schistosity (mica schists). Open symbols: stretching lineation. Brown circles: orthogneiss; purple triangles: mica schists; green diamonds: metabasites; black squares: mean vectors; curve: cylindrical best fit of poles to main foliation/schistosity.

b. The southern part of the island consists mainly of acidic orthogneiss. It encloses on the west coast a large stretched enclave of mica schists with metabasite lenses (Fig. 1c), similar to what occurs on the northern part of the island; everywhere, the immediate host rock of the metabasite pods is mica schist, never orthogneiss. This orthogneiss also locally shows narrow apophyses and veins intensely stretched within the mica schists, parallel to the main foliation (Figs. 1c, 3b); the largest of these veins, about 10 metres thick, crosses the island below the former sheep barn (bergerie) with a strike of 114° (Figs. 1c, 2), whilst other metre-thick veins are visible here and there in the mica schists (e.g. Fig. 3b). These observations suggest that the magmatic protolith

has intruded the mica schists before being intensely deformed. Within a zone a few metres thick near the contact with the mica schists, this orthogneiss appears to be more leucocratic, being enriched in white mica.

The EW-oriented S-dipping foliation in the orthogneiss is essentially parallel to the main schistosity in the mica schists, and so are the less pronounced E-dipping stretching lineations (Fig. 1d). At the island scale, these foliation and schistosity planes, termed S₂ by Audren (1987), are slightly dispersed around an axis parallel to the stretching lineation L₂ (the best cylindrical fit of the S₂ poles is approximately perpendicular to L₂; Fig. 1d). Audren (1987) observed early structures in mica schists, in particular an early schistosity
(S₁) isoclinally folded parallel to the main schistosity S₂. The metabasite boudins form discontinuous alignments (Fig. 1c), which most likely result from the stretching of initially more or less continuous levels of a mafic protolith. The foliation and stretching lineation within these metabasite lenses are subparallel to those in their host rock but more irregular and scattered (Fig. 1d), presumably due to some disruption during boudinage.

### 3 Samples and methods

We were authorised to access the island for 2 consecutive days, which allowed us to complete a new geological map (Fig. 1c), make some quick structural observations (Fig. 1d) and collect 41 samples. We were also fortunate enough to observe 35 thin sections of rocks collected on the island in the 1980s by Bernard Lasnier. The study was completed on the mainland by the search, observation and petrological study of similar rocks, mostly mica schists and retrogressed metabasites, from the banks of the Vilaine estuary.

A selection of 34 samples, either from the island or from the mainland, were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and with an electron microprobe (EMP). They were studied under a Zeiss Supra 55 VP SEM at Paris-Sorbonne Université, in particular to produce backscattered-electron (BSE) images and X-ray elemental maps. Image processing was carried out using Photoshop® (brightness and contrast adjustments; smoothing and enhancement filtering) and ENVI® (principal-component analysis, mineral classification). EMP analyses of the minerals were carried out using the Cameca SXFive electron microprobe at the Camparis laboratory in Paris (http://www.service-camparis.fr/, last access: 10 January 2024). The analytical conditions were a beam current of 10 nA, an acceleration voltage of 15 kV and a spot diameter of about 1 µm. Natural minerals and synthetic oxides were used as standards. The structural formulae are calculated on the basis of quantities of O and OH anions depending on the mineral group, i.e. for garnets, O₁₂ and Fe³⁺ = 2 - Altotal - Cr - 2 × Ti, with AlIV set at zero; for epidotes, O₁₂(F,OH)₁ and Fe³⁺ = Fe total; for micas, O₂₀(OH, F)₄, Fe³⁺ = 0; for chlorites, O₂₀(OH)₁₆, Fe³⁺ = 0; for feldspars, O₈, Fe³⁺ = Fe total; for pyroxenes, O₆, Fe³⁺ value corresponds to a total of four cations; for amphiboles, the procedure of Hawthorne et al. (2012) and Locock (2014) was used, giving a range of Fe³⁺ values for which the cation distribution in the T, C, B and A sites is correct; since the amount of ferric iron is limited in mafic rocks, we finally chose the minimum value of Fe³⁺, which is generally zero.

In order to reconstruct the metamorphic evolution of the rocks, we have studied in greater detail four samples representative of the rocks observed on the island, namely an eclogite (ID25a), a garnet glaucophanite (ID25b), a mica schist (ID13) and an orthogneiss (ID17):

a. The first two samples (ID25a and ID25b) come from one of the 40 cm sized loose blocks of glaucophane eclogite found on the beach, east of Fort de Ré. This block was chosen over the strongly retrogressed eclogites and amphibolites outcropping nearby because of its well-preserved HP mineralogy. It shows an alternation of bands, analysed and modelled separately, of (i) eclogite (omphacite + garnet + epidote + quartz; ID25a: Fig. 4a) and (ii) garnet glaucophanite (glaucophane + garnet + minor quartz; ID25b: Fig. 4b). Its study was complemented by that of other metabasites, either well-preserved glaucophane eclogites (ID1, ID9) or metabasites retrogressed to garnet amphibolites (ID16, ID33), sampled on the foreshore (ID1, ID9) or from the many mafic boudins on the north of the island (ID16: 47.4113, -2.6185; ID33: 47.4136, -2.6197).

b. The third sample (ID13) is a *mica schist*, containing garnet, chlorite, phengite, paragonite, albite and quartz, collected in situ (47.4113, -2.6183) at a short distance from the retrogressed eclogite lens in Fig. 3a.

d. Finally, a representative sample of the southern *orthogneiss* (ID17) was collected in situ (47.4111, -2.6189) close to the contact with the mica schists, at about 50 m from the previous sample ID13.

We calculated isochemical *P*–*T* pseudosections for three of these selected samples (ID25a, ID25b and ID13). The last sample (ID17), although studied in detail, was not retained as suitable for modelling a *P*–*T* pseudosection because it was not fully equilibrated during metamorphism, having preserved many minerals of the magmatic protolith, in particular feldspars. Since a *P*–*T* pseudosection is valid for a given bulk chemical composition, the three samples were crushed, ground and analysed by inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for major elements and by ICP–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for trace elements, at the Service d’Analyse des Roches et des Minéraux in Nancy, France, according to protocols detailed at http://sarm.cnrs.fr (last access: 10 January 2024). The resulting bulk-rock compositions (Table 1) were slightly modified for modelling purposes. Total CaO was reduced based on the amount of P₂O₅ sequestering Ca in apatite, which is not taken into account in the modelling. The negligible amount of Cr₂O₃ was added to Al₂O₃, since CrVI substitutes for AlVI in many minerals. H₂O was assumed to be in excess, which seems reasonable given the abundance of hydrous minerals and the loss-on-ignition value (LOI; Table 1). Since the cores of the garnet crystals are isolated after their growth, the effective chemical composition of the system differs slightly from the bulk-rock composition. However, due to the very small size of the garnet crystals – typically 0.4 mm in diameter (Fig. 4) – this fractionation phenomenon was not considered critical and was therefore neglected. Finally, the amount of O associated with Fe³⁺ was estimated from the structural formulae
(S₁) isoclinally folded parallel to the main schistosity S₂. The metabasite boudins form discontinuous alignments (Fig. 1c), which most likely result from the stretching of initially more or less continuous levels of a mafic protolith. The foliation and stretching lineation within these metabasite lenses are subparallel to those in their host rock but more irregular and scattered (Fig. 1d), presumably due to some disruption during boudinage.

### 3 Samples and methods

We were authorised to access the island for 2 consecutive days, which allowed us to complete a new geological map (Fig. 1c), make some quick structural observations (Fig. 1d) and collect 41 samples. We were also fortunate enough to observe 35 thin sections of rocks collected on the island in the 1980s by Bernard Lasnier. The study was completed on the mainland by the search, observation and petrological study of similar rocks, mostly mica schists and retrogressed metabasites, from the banks of the Vilaine estuary.

A selection of 34 samples, either from the island or from the mainland, were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and with an electron microprobe (EMP). They were studied under a Zeiss Supra 55 VP SEM at Paris-Sorbonne Université, in particular to produce backscattered-electron (BSE) images and X-ray elemental maps. Image processing was carried out using Photoshop® (brightness and contrast adjustments; smoothing and enhancement filtering) and ENVI® (principal-component analysis, mineral classification). EMP analyses of the minerals were carried out using the Cameca SXFive electron microprobe at the Camparis laboratory in Paris (http://www.service-camparis.fr/, last access: 10 January 2024). The analytical conditions were a beam current of 10 nA, an acceleration voltage of 15 kV and a spot diameter of about 1 µm. Natural minerals and synthetic oxides were used as standards. The structural formulae are calculated on the basis of quantities of O and OH anions depending on the mineral group, i.e. for garnets, O₁₂ and Fe³⁺ = 2 - Alₜotal - Cr - 2 × Ti, with AlIV set at zero; for epidotes, O₁₂(F,OH)₁ and Fe³⁺ = Feₜotal; for micas, O₂₀(OH, F)₄, Fe³⁺ = 0; for chlorites, O₂₀(OH)₁₆, Fe³⁺ = 0; for feldspars, O₈, Fe³⁺ = Feₜotal; for pyroxenes, O₆, Fe³⁺ value corresponds to a total of four cations; for amphiboles, the procedure of Hawthorne et al. (2012) and Locock (2014) was used, giving a range of Fe³⁺ values for which the cation distribution in the T, C, B and A sites is correct; since the amount of ferric iron is limited in mafic rocks, we finally chose the minimum value of Fe³⁺, which is generally zero.

In order to reconstruct the metamorphic evolution of the rocks, we have studied in greater detail four samples representative of the rocks observed on the island, namely an eclogite (ID25a), a garnet glaucophanite (ID25b), a mica schist (ID13) and an orthogneiss (ID17):

a. The first two samples (ID25a and ID25b) come from one of the 40 cm sized loose blocks of glaucophane eclogite found on the beach, east of Fort de Ré. This block was chosen over the strongly retrogressed eclogites and amphibolites outcropping nearby because of its well-preserved HP mineralogy. It shows an alternation of bands, analysed and modelled separately, of (i) eclogite (omphacite + garnet + epidote + quartz; ID25a: Fig. 4a) and (ii) garnet glaucophanite (glaucophane + garnet + minor quartz; ID25b: Fig. 4b). Its study was complemented by that of other metabasites, either well-preserved glaucophane eclogites (ID1, ID9) or metabasites retrogressed to garnet amphibolites (ID16, ID33), sampled on the foreshore (ID1, ID9) or from the many mafic boudins on the north of the island (ID16: 47.4113, -2.6185; ID33: 47.4136, -2.6197).

b. The third sample (ID13) is a *mica schist*, containing garnet, chlorite, phengite, paragonite, albite and quartz, collected in situ (47.4113, -2.6183) at a short distance from the retrogressed eclogite lens in Fig. 3a.

d. Finally, a representative sample of the southern *orthogneiss* (ID17) was collected in situ (47.4111, -2.6189) close to the contact with the mica schists, at about 50 m from the previous sample ID13.

We calculated isochemical *P*–*T* pseudosections for three of these selected samples (ID25a, ID25b and ID13). The last sample (ID17), although studied in detail, was not retained as suitable for modelling a *P*–*T* pseudosection because it was not fully equilibrated during metamorphism, having preserved many minerals of the magmatic protolith, in particular feldspars. Since a *P*–*T* pseudosection is valid for a given bulk chemical composition, the three samples were crushed, ground and analysed by inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for major elements and by ICP–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for trace elements, at the Service d’Analyse des Roches et des Minéraux in Nancy, France, according to protocols detailed at http://sarm.cnrs.fr (last access: 10 January 2024). The resulting bulk-rock compositions (Table 1) were slightly modified for modelling purposes. Total CaO was reduced based on the amount of P₂O₅ sequestering Ca in apatite, which is not taken into account in the modelling. The negligible amount of Cr₂O₃ was added to Al₂O₃, since CrVI substitutes for AlVI in many minerals. H₂O was assumed to be in excess, which seems reasonable given the abundance of hydrous minerals and the loss-on-ignition value (LOI; Table 1). Since the cores of the garnet crystals are isolated after their growth, the effective chemical composition of the system differs slightly from the bulk-rock composition. However, due to the very small size of the garnet crystals – typically 0.4 mm in diameter (Fig. 4) – this fractionation phenomenon was not considered critical and was therefore neglected. Finally, the amount of O associated with Fe³⁺ was estimated from the structural formulae
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Aerial photograph of Île Dumet, looking NNW. Dashed red line: contact between orthogneiss and mica schists with metabasite lenses; orange ellipse: occurrence on the foreshore of numerous loose blocks of glaucophane eclogite, 0.1–0.4 m in size; © Valery Joncheray.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Field macrostructures. (a) A 1 m sized blue-green lens of retrogressed eclogite, boudinaged within mica schist and characteristically more retrogressed towards its margins (47.4116, -2.6184). (b) A 0.5 m wide vein of banded orthogneiss (light grey) within mica schists (dark grey-brown; 47.4112, -2.6189). The foliation in the orthogneiss is parallel to the main schistosity of the mica schists, indicating that the two rocks have been deformed together; the orthogneiss vein shows ramifications and enclaves suggesting that it is derived from an earlier granitoid that intruded the mica schist protolith.</figcaption></figure>

and molar proportions of the minerals in the main paragenesis, bearing in mind of course that this value may have changed during metamorphic evolution. The molar proportion of the minerals in each rock was estimated by the least-squares method, using the chemical composition of the bulk rock and that of the minerals; the result (Table 1) was considered satisfactory if the residuals were small and the stoichio-metric coefficients obtained for the minerals were positive (see Godard, 2009, for the method and software). These molar quantities were then converted into volume percentages (Table 1), using the molar volumes of Holland and Powell (2011).

The pseudosection modelling was carried out in the chemical system K₂O-Na₂O-CaO-FeO-MgO-Al₂O₃-SiO₂-MnO-H₂O-TiO₂-O, using the software THERMOCALC v3.45 (Powell and Holland, 1988) and an updated version of the thermodynamic data set of Holland and Powell (2011) (ds62 of February 2012). The activity-composition models used for solid solutions are as follows: Green et al. (2016) for omphacitic clinopyroxenes and the clinoamphiboles, “hornblende”, actinolite, and glaucophane, which may be co-stable; White et al. (2014) for garnet, staurolite and chlorite; Smye et al. (2010) for phengite, muscovite and paragonite; Holland and Powell (2011) for epidote; and Hol-
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Aerial photograph of Île Dumet, looking NNW. Dashed red line: contact between orthogneiss and mica schists with metabasite lenses; orange ellipse: occurrence on the foreshore of numerous loose blocks of glaucophane eclogite, 0.1–0.4 m in size; © Valery Joncheray.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Field macrostructures. (a) A 1 m sized blue-green lens of retrogressed eclogite, boudinaged within mica schist and characteristically more retrogressed towards its margins (47.4116, -2.6184). (b) A 0.5 m wide vein of banded orthogneiss (light grey) within mica schists (dark grey-brown; 47.4112, -2.6189). The foliation in the orthogneiss is parallel to the main schistosity of the mica schists, indicating that the two rocks have been deformed together; the orthogneiss vein shows ramifications and enclaves suggesting that it is derived from an earlier granitoid that intruded the mica schist protolith.</figcaption></figure>

and molar proportions of the minerals in the main paragenesis, bearing in mind of course that this value may have changed during metamorphic evolution. The molar proportion of the minerals in each rock was estimated by the least-squares method, using the chemical composition of the bulk rock and that of the minerals; the result (Table 1) was considered satisfactory if the residuals were small and the stoichio-metric coefficients obtained for the minerals were positive (see Godard, 2009, for the method and software). These molar quantities were then converted into volume percentages (Table 1), using the molar volumes of Holland and Powell (2011).

The pseudosection modelling was carried out in the chemical system K₂O-Na₂O-CaO-FeO-MgO-Al₂O₃-SiO₂-MnO-H₂O-TiO₂-O, using the software THERMOCALC v3.45 (Powell and Holland, 1988) and an updated version of the thermodynamic data set of Holland and Powell (2011) (ds62 of February 2012). The activity-composition models used for solid solutions are as follows: Green et al. (2016) for omphacitic clinopyroxenes and the clinoamphiboles, “hornblende”, actinolite, and glaucophane, which may be co-stable; White et al. (2014) for garnet, staurolite and chlorite; Smye et al. (2010) for phengite, muscovite and paragonite; Holland and Powell (2011) for epidote; and Hol-
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

**Figure 4.** Rock microstructures. (a–g) Images elaborated by principal-component analysis of 11 element maps; (h) BSE image. (a) Eclogite band (sample ID25a). (b) Garnet glaucophanite band (sample ID25b); glaucophane crystals (Gln) show overgrowths of Na–Ca amphiboles (kw) in the foliation direction and are bordered by a thin film of late Ca amphibole, mainly actinolite (Act). (c) Retrogressed eclogite (sample ID16): garnet crystals are set in a matrix of clinozoisite, clinoamphibole and albite, with rare relics of quartz and rutile mainly transformed into titanite. (d) Retrogressed eclogite (sample ID33): a crystal of paragonite, with a few lamellae of exsolved phengite, is surrounded by a reaction corona of epidote and albite. (e, f) Mica schist (sample ID13): garnet crystals may show an atoll structure with a lagoon of phengite and quartz; the phengite flakes evolve towards muscovite at their edges and show exsolution lamellae of paragonite, which is absent from the matrix where albite is found instead; chlorite forms radiating aggregates possibly after another mineral; rutile is partially transformed into titanite. (g, h) Orthogneiss (sample ID17): exsolution lamellae of albite (a: perthite) and of microcline in albite (b: antiperthite) indicate a magmatic origin; Ca-rich garnet microcrystals associated with phengite and microcline are preferentially located at the contacts between chlorite (after biotite) and plagioclase.
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

**Figure 4.** Rock microstructures. (a–g) Images elaborated by principal-component analysis of 11 element maps; (h) BSE image. (a) Eclogite band (sample ID25a). (b) Garnet glaucophanite band (sample ID25b); glaucophane crystals (Gln) show overgrowths of Na–Ca amphiboles (kw) in the foliation direction and are bordered by a thin film of late Ca amphibole, mainly actinolite (Act). (c) Retrogressed eclogite (sample ID16): garnet crystals are set in a matrix of clinozoisite, clinoamphibole and albite, with rare relics of quartz and rutile mainly transformed into titanite. (d) Retrogressed eclogite (sample ID33): a crystal of paragonite, with a few lamellae of exsolved phengite, is surrounded by a reaction corona of epidote and albite. (e, f) Mica schist (sample ID13): garnet crystals may show an atoll structure with a lagoon of phengite and quartz; the phengite flakes evolve towards muscovite at their edges and show exsolution lamellae of paragonite, which is absent from the matrix where albite is found instead; chlorite forms radiating aggregates possibly after another mineral; rutile is partially transformed into titanite. (g, h) Orthogneiss (sample ID17): exsolution lamellae of albite (a: perthite) and of microcline in albite (b: antiperthite) indicate a magmatic origin; Ca-rich garnet microcrystals associated with phengite and microcline are preferentially located at the contacts between chlorite (after biotite) and plagioclase.
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Compositions of the eclogite (ID25a), garnet glaucophanite (ID25b) and mica schist (ID13) used to model the P–T pseudosections. See Sect. 3 for details of the bulk-rock analyses and the calculation of the modal percentages; LOI: loss on ignition; Amp*: Ca–Na clinoamphibole.</caption><thead><tr><th>Sample</th><th>Rock</th><th>Unit</th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>MnO</th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th><th>LOI</th><th>Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>wt %</td><td>51.90</td><td>14.53</td><td>14.24</td><td>0.21</td><td>3.19</td><td>11.57</td><td>2.29</td><td>0.06</td><td>1.16</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.20</td><td>99.44</td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>wt %</td><td>48.68</td><td>14.51</td><td>17.65</td><td>0.23</td><td>5.80</td><td>7.77</td><td>3.52</td><td>0.07</td><td>1.38</td><td>&lt;0.10</td><td>-0.08</td><td>99.53</td></tr><tr><td>ID13</td><td>mica schist</td><td>wt %</td><td>67.30</td><td>14.96</td><td>5.14</td><td>0.05</td><td>2.05</td><td>1.29</td><td>1.74</td><td>2.84</td><td>0.64</td><td>0.18</td><td>2.73</td><td>98.91</td></tr><tr><td colspan="14">Modal composition</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Grt</td><td></td><td>Omp</td><td>Gln</td><td>Amp*</td><td>Qz</td><td>Ep</td><td>Chl</td><td>Ph</td><td>Pg</td><td>Ab</td><td>Rt</td><td>Ttn</td><td>Ap</td></tr><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>vol %</td><td>27.0</td><td>30.2</td><td></td><td></td><td>4.6</td><td>19.7</td><td>16.3</td><td></td><td>0.2</td><td>0.7</td><td></td><td>0.9</td><td></td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>vol %</td><td>31.7</td><td>20.2</td><td>21.5</td><td></td><td>16.6</td><td>6.2</td><td>0.0</td><td></td><td>0.3</td><td>2.4</td><td></td><td>1.0</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>ID13</td><td>mica schist</td><td>vol %</td><td>2.4</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>41.3</td><td>0.0</td><td>9.2</td><td>31.3</td><td>0.0</td><td>13.7</td><td></td><td>1.2</td><td>0.7</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="14">CIPW norm converted into vol.</td></tr><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>vol %</td><td>0.3</td><td>1.7</td><td>Mt</td><td>O1</td><td>Opx</td><td>Cpx</td><td>PI</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>vol %</td><td>0.0</td><td>1.7</td><td>0.0</td><td></td><td>17.4</td><td>24.2</td><td>49.5</td><td>(Or<sub>0.7</sub> Ab<sub>41.0</sub> An<sub>58.3</sub>)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>6.9</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>30.1</td><td>11.4</td><td>41.3</td><td>(Or<sub>0.7</sub> Ab<sub>56.8</sub> An<sub>42.4</sub>)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="14">CIPW norm converted into vol.</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>As</td><td></td><td>Ba</td><td>Be</td><td>Bi</td><td>Cd</td><td>Ce</td><td>Co</td><td>Cr</td><td>Cs</td><td>Cu</td><td>Dy</td><td>Er</td><td>Eu</td><td>Ga</td><td>Gd</td></tr><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>µg g<sup>-1</sup></td><td>0.69</td><td>7.6</td><td>0.47</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.29</td><td>7.51</td><td>27.8</td><td>7.0</td><td>0.08</td><td>10.6</td><td>3.45</td><td>2.24</td><td>0.965</td><td>23.1</td><td>2.84</td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>µg g<sup>-1</sup></td><td>0.87</td><td>29.1</td><td>0.52</td><td>&lt;0.05</td><td>0.30</td><td>6.29</td><td>50.7</td><td>9.9</td><td>0.07</td><td>15.7</td><td>4.06</td><td>2.67</td><td>0.597</td><td>15.6</td><td>2.50</td></tr><tr><td colspan="14">Ge</td></tr><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>µg g<sup>-1</sup></td><td>2.02</td><td>1.11</td><td>0.801</td><td>0.09</td><td>3.22</td><td>0.342</td><td>&lt;0.50</td><td>0.38</td><td>6.11</td><td>6.4</td><td>56.7</td><td>1.19</td><td>1.89</td><td>49.2</td><td>0.51</td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>µg g<sup>-1</sup></td><td>1.55</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.936</td><td>0.06</td><td>2.49</td><td>0.434</td><td>1.00</td><td>0.48</td><td>5.18</td><td>12.2</td><td>3.02</td><td>0.98</td><td>2.38</td><td>58.1</td><td>0.49</td></tr><tr><td colspan="14">Sm</td></tr><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>µg g<sup>-1</sup></td><td>2.21</td><td>0.55</td><td>474.0</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.505</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.327</td><td>0.30</td><td>544</td><td>&lt;0.80</td><td>20.6</td><td>2.24</td><td>73.3</td><td>31.0</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>µg g<sup>-1</sup></td><td>1.80</td><td>0.51</td><td>26.4</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.556</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.388</td><td>0.18</td><td>525</td><td>1.51</td><td>24.7</td><td>2.74</td><td>172</td><td>37.6</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

land and Powell (2003) for plagioclase. Ordered low albite (Ab) was considered in addition to disordered plagioclase solid solution (PI) because the peristerite miscibility gap can occur in low-T conditions. Low albite, lawsonite, rutile, titanite, quartz and water are considered pure phases.

Mineral abbreviations used hereafter are taken from Whitney and Evans (2010); “apfu” means “atoms per formula unit”. Mineral compositions are often expressed as molar percentages of the end-members (e.g. Or<sub>0.6</sub> Ab<sub>99.0</sub> An<sub>0.4</sub> Cls<sub>0.0</sub>). The margins of error given for the molar compositions and ratios are ±1σ. Latitude and longitude (negative westwards) are given in decimal degrees. A few figures (Figs. S1 and S2) and tables (Tables S1 and S2) are available in the Supplement.

# 4 Petrological and mineralogical study

## 4.1 Metabasites

The best-preserved glaucophane eclogites of Île Dumet are provided by large blocks collected on the northern part of the island (e.g. samples ID1, ID9, ID25; Fig. 2). These huge loose blocks consist of a fine-grained banded rock, with alternating greenish and dark-blue bands, 1 to 10 cm thick, consisting of eclogite and garnet glaucophanite, respectively. Chemically, these levels differ mainly in their Ca and Na contents (Table 1) but show fairly similar chondrite-normalised rare-earth-element (REE) profiles (Fig. 5). Their crystals are

oriented and define a foliation subparallel to the banding, which has therefore been transposed parallel to the foliation.

The eclogite bands (ID25a: Figs. 4a, S1a) are composed of the following: omphacite; subhedral garnet crystals whose diameters never reach 1 mm; abundant epidote ($X_{Fe^{3+}} = Fe^{3+}/(Fe^{3+} + Al + Mn^{3+} + Cr) = 0.215 \pm 0.028$); quartz; minor Ca–Na amphibole; and accessory rutile, fluorapatite and paragonite. The garnet crystals show a clear zonation, with cores richer in Ca and especially Mn and poorer in Mg than their rims (ID25a in Fig. 6a, d; core→rim: Alm<sub>43.9→57.8</sub> Prp<sub>0.9→12.1</sub> Grs<sub>33.2→29.3</sub> Sps<sub>22.0→0.7</sub>; $X_{Mg} = 0.1$).

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Rare-earth elements in glaucophane eclogite ID25. REE concentrations in the eclogite and garnet glaucophanite levels of sample ID25 are normalised to chondrite, using normalisation values from Evensen et al. (1978).</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Compositions of the eclogite (ID25a), garnet glaucophanite (ID25b) and mica schist (ID13) used to model the *P*–*T* pseudosections. See Sect. 3 for details of the bulk-rock analyses and the calculation of the modal percentages; LOI: loss on ignition; Amp*: Ca–Na clinoamphibole.</caption><thead><tr><th>Sample</th><th>Rock</th><th>Unit</th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>MnO</th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th><th>LOI</th><th>Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>wt %</td><td>51.90</td><td>14.53</td><td>14.24</td><td>0.21</td><td>3.19</td><td>11.57</td><td>2.29</td><td>0.06</td><td>1.16</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.20</td><td>99.44</td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>wt %</td><td>48.68</td><td>14.51</td><td>17.65</td><td>0.23</td><td>5.80</td><td>7.77</td><td>3.52</td><td>0.07</td><td>1.38</td><td>&lt;0.10</td><td>-0.08</td><td>99.53</td></tr><tr><td>ID13</td><td>mica schist</td><td>wt %</td><td>67.30</td><td>14.96</td><td>5.14</td><td>0.05</td><td>2.05</td><td>1.29</td><td>1.74</td><td>2.84</td><td>0.64</td><td>0.18</td><td>2.73</td><td>98.91</td></tr><tr><td colspan="14">Modal composition</td></tr><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>vol %</td><td>27.0</td><td>30.2</td><td></td><td>4.6</td><td>19.7</td><td>16.3</td><td></td><td>0.2</td><td>0.7</td><td></td><td>0.9</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>vol %</td><td>31.7</td><td>20.2</td><td>21.5</td><td>16.6</td><td>6.2</td><td>0.0</td><td></td><td>0.3</td><td>2.4</td><td></td><td>1.0</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>ID13</td><td>mica schist</td><td>vol %</td><td>2.4</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>41.3</td><td>0.0</td><td>9.2</td><td>31.3</td><td>0.0</td><td>13.7</td><td></td><td>1.2</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td colspan="14">CIPW norm converted into vol.</td></tr><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>vol %</td><td>0.3</td><td>1.7</td><td>0.0</td><td></td><td>17.4</td><td>24.2</td><td>49.5</td><td>(Or<sub>0.7</sub> Ab<sub>41.0</sub> An<sub>58.3</sub>)</td><td></td><td></td><td>6.9</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>vol %</td><td>0.0</td><td>1.7</td><td>0.0</td><td>15.5</td><td>30.1</td><td>11.4</td><td>41.3</td><td>(Or<sub>0.7</sub> Ab<sub>56.8</sub> An<sub>42.4</sub>)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="14">CIPW norm converted into vol.</td></tr><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>vol %</td><td>0.69</td><td>7.6</td><td>0.47</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.29</td><td>7.51</td><td>27.8</td><td>7.0</td><td>0.08</td><td>10.6</td><td>3.45</td><td>2.24</td><td>0.965</td><td>23.1</td><td>2.84</td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>vol %</td><td>0.87</td><td>29.1</td><td>0.52</td><td>&lt;0.05</td><td>0.30</td><td>6.29</td><td>50.7</td><td>9.9</td><td>0.07</td><td>15.7</td><td>4.06</td><td>2.67</td><td>0.597</td><td>15.6</td><td>2.50</td></tr><tr><td colspan="14">Ge</td></tr><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>µg g<sup>-1</sup></td><td>2.02</td><td>1.11</td><td>0.801</td><td>0.09</td><td>3.22</td><td>0.342</td><td>&lt;0.50</td><td>0.38</td><td>6.11</td><td>6.4</td><td>56.7</td><td>1.19</td><td>1.89</td><td>49.2</td><td>0.51</td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>µg g<sup>-1</sup></td><td>1.55</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.936</td><td>0.06</td><td>2.49</td><td>0.434</td><td>1.00</td><td>0.48</td><td>5.18</td><td>12.2</td><td>3.02</td><td>0.98</td><td>2.38</td><td>58.1</td><td>0.49</td></tr><tr><td colspan="14">Sm</td></tr><tr><td>ID25a</td><td>eclogite</td><td>µg g<sup>-1</sup></td><td>2.21</td><td>0.55</td><td>474.0</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.505</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.327</td><td>0.30</td><td>544</td><td>&lt;0.80</td><td>20.6</td><td>2.24</td><td>73.3</td><td>31.0</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>ID25b</td><td>glaucophanite</td><td>µg g<sup>-1</sup></td><td>1.80</td><td>0.51</td><td>26.4</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.556</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.388</td><td>0.18</td><td>525</td><td>1.51</td><td>24.7</td><td>2.74</td><td>172</td><td>37.6</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

land and Powell (2003) for plagioclase. Ordered low albite (Ab) was considered in addition to disordered plagioclase solid solution (Pl) because the peristerite miscibility gap can occur in low-*T* conditions. Low albite, lawsonite, rutile, titanite, quartz and water are considered pure phases.

Mineral abbreviations used hereafter are taken from Whitney and Evans (2010); “apfu” means “atoms per formula unit”. Mineral compositions are often expressed as molar percentages of the end-members (e.g. Or<sub>0.6</sub> Ab<sub>99.0</sub> An<sub>0.4</sub> Cls<sub>0.0</sub>). The margins of error given for the molar compositions and ratios are ±1σ. Latitude and longitude (negative westwards) are given in decimal degrees. A few figures (Figs. S1 and S2) and tables (Tables S1 and S2) are available in the Supplement.

# 4 Petrological and mineralogical study

## 4.1 Metabasites

The best-preserved glaucophane eclogites of Île Dumet are provided by large blocks collected on the northern part of the island (e.g. samples ID1, ID9, ID25; Fig. 2). These huge loose blocks consist of a fine-grained banded rock, with alternating greenish and dark-blue bands, 1 to 10 cm thick, consisting of eclogite and garnet glaucophanite, respectively. Chemically, these levels differ mainly in their Ca and Na contents (Table 1) but show fairly similar chondrite-normalised rare-earth-element (REE) profiles (Fig. 5). Their crystals are

oriented and define a foliation subparallel to the banding, which has therefore been transposed parallel to the foliation.

The eclogite bands (ID25a: Figs. 4a, S1a) are composed of the following: omphacite; subhedral garnet crystals whose diameters never reach 1 mm; abundant epidote ($X_{Fe^{3+}} = Fe^{3+}/(Fe^{3+} + Al + Mn^{3+} + Cr) = 0.215 \pm 0.028$); quartz; minor Ca–Na amphibole; and accessory rutile, fluorapatite and paragonite. The garnet crystals show a clear zonation, with cores richer in Ca and especially Mn and poorer in Mg than their rims (ID25a in Fig. 6a, d; core→rim: Alm<sub>43.9→57.8</sub> Prp<sub>0.9→12.1</sub> Grs<sub>33.2→29.3</sub> Sps<sub>22.0→0.7</sub>; $X_{Mg} = $

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Rare-earth elements in glaucophane eclogite ID25. REE concentrations in the eclogite and garnet glaucophanite levels of sample ID25 are normalised to chondrite, using normalisation values from Evensen et al. (1978).</figcaption></figure>
Mg/(Mg + Fe²⁺ + Mn) = 0.014 → 0.172). In these garnet crystals, numerous inclusions of quartz, epidote and titanite (in the core of the crystals) and rutile (at their edges) can be observed, as well as rare omphacite (Fig. 4a), which has a lower Na content (triangles in Fig. 7) than the omphacite in the matrix (ID25a: Na = 0.414 ± 0.029 vs. 0.485 ± 0.017 apfu, respectively). The omphacite in the matrix is quite homogeneous (Fig. 7; e.g. ID25a: Jd₃₉.₅ ± 2.₆ Aeg₉.₁ ± 2.₄; Xₘ₉ = 0.809 ± 0.028); the slight apparent spread of its composition along a Jd₃₉.₄ Aeg₉.₁ vector (Fig. 7) is presumably related to the uncertainty in the stoichiometric estimation of Fe³⁺ (see Sect. 3). In some slightly retrogressed eclogite samples (e.g. ID9), a decrease in jadeite content occurs at the edges of the omphacite crystals, where jadeite is exsolved in the form of albite (see “towards Ab” in Fig. 7).

The garnet glaucophanite bands (ID25b: Figs. 4b, S1b) are composed mainly of clinoamphibole, subhedral garnet, omphacite and quartz, with minor rutile, paragonite, K-feldspar and late albite. The garnet crystals, generally smaller than those in the eclogite bands, are however similar in composition and zoning (ID25b in Fig. 6b vs. ID25a in Fig. 6a). They enclose minute inclusions of quartz, epidote, titanite, rutile, apatite and rare amphibole including glaucophane (ID9 in Table 2). Omphacite also has a composition quite similar to that of the neighbouring eclogite layers (ID25b vs. ID25a in Fig. 7; Jd₃₇.₁ ± 4.₀ Aeg₁₃.₆ ± 3.₇; Xₘ₉ = 0.856 ± 0.030). The amphibole crystals in the matrix, typically 0.2 mm in size, generally consist of a homogeneous nucleus of glaucophane (Gln in Fig. 4b; circles in Fig. 8c, d; Table 2), on which have grown, parallel to the foliation, overgrowths of a slightly zoned Ca-Na amphibole, katophorite or winchite (kw in Fig. 4b; Fig. 8a, b; squares in Fig. 8c, d; Table 2). Each crystal, thus elongated parallel to the foliation, is also bordered by a zone a few micrometres thick whose composition is Ca-rich and varies from pargasite/magnesio-hornblende to actinolite (Act in Fig. 4b; “+” in Fig. 8c, d). Actinolite also occurs along late fractures that cut the foliation. This general evolution from Na to Ca species is accompanied by a decrease in Xₘ₉ to reach Fe²⁺-rich ferrous species. Amphibole is also present around garnet, forming microcoronas of (ferro-)katophorite or (ferro-)pargasite (“×” in Fig. 8c, d; Table 2). Some large crystals of (ferro-)pargasite included in garnet seem to belong to the same generation of Fe-rich amphibole as that in the microcoronas (ID1 in Table 2; triangles in Fig. 8c, d); like the latter, they would have developed late at the expense of the host garnet rather than being trapped during its growth.

The generally fine-grained metabasites of the numerous lenses stretched within the mica schists (Fig. 3a) are essentially composed of subhedral crystals of garnet, commonly < 1 mm in size, and amphibole forming coarse symplectites with albite; clinozoisite (or epidote); and, incidentally, quartz, paragonite, apatite and titanite with internal relics of rutile (Figs. 4c, d, S1c, d; e.g. samples ID16 and

ID33). The composition and zonation of the garnet crystals are very similar to those of the well-preserved eclogites, in particular with a core rich in Mn (Fig. 6c vs. 6a; Fig. 6d); they also contain inclusions of epidote, quartz, amphibole and titanite. Ca-rich clinoamphibole, most commonly paragasite, magnesio-hornblende or actinolite (Fig. 8c), forms symplectites with albite (ca. Ab₉₉). As in some glaucophane eclogites (see above), amphibole also forms microcoronas of pargasitic composition around garnet (“×” in Fig. 8c, d) and is particularly Al- and Ca-rich, with a high Fe²⁺ content (ID16: Xₘ₉²⁺ = Fe²⁺/(Fe²⁺ + Mn + Mg) = 0.429 ± 0.029 vs. 0.313 ± 0.017 for the matrix amphibole). These chemical characteristics are clearly related to the role of garnet as a reactant during the later amphibole growth, as is typical in the retrogression of eclogites worldwide.

In some samples, particularly ID33, some relict paragonite is surrounded by a corona of clinozoisite (Figs. 4d, S1d). We attempted to balance this coronitic reaction using the least-squares method (see Sect. 3):

$$0.516\text{Pg} + 0.313\text{Cam} + 1.358\text{Qz} \rightarrow 1\text{Czo} + 1.140\text{Ab} + 0.067\text{Kfs} + 0.844\text{H}_2\text{O} + 1\text{R},$$

where R is the residual vector (Si₀.₀₀₀ Al⁺₀.₀₀₂ Ti⁻₀.₀₀₆ Fe⁻₀.₀₈₁ Mn⁺₀.₀₀₀ Mg⁻₀.₇₇₄ Ca⁺₁.₅₀₈ Na⁻₀.₀₁₄ K⁻₀.₀₀₂). Although at first glance the result fits the observation, the large residuals for Ca and Mg indicate that one or more other reactants, now consumed (omphacite?), may have been involved in the reaction or that the latter took place in an open system.

These garnet amphibolites show notable differences from the glaucophane eclogites: absence of omphacite, presence of Ca-rich amphibole instead of Na or Na-Ca amphiboles, and ubiquitous albite. However, they also show remarkable similarities: similar composition and zoning of garnet crystals; presence of paragonite, quartz and rutile (as relics within titanite coronas); and ferro-pargasite coronas around garnet. It therefore appears clear that the garnet amphibolites are retrogression products of the eclogites, which is also supported by the presence in some partially retrogressed eclogite samples (e.g. ID9) of similar late microstructures (pargasite coronas around garnet, amphibole + albite symplectites and titanite coronas around rutile).

## 4.2 Mica schists

The mica schists have a satiny grey appearance and alternate with levels rich in quartz. Under the polarising microscope, they are composed as follows (in order of decreasing abundance): quartz; white micas; garnet crystals that can reach a few millimetres in diameter; clinozoisite in small euhedral crystals; chlorite, which commonly forms small aggregates of several millimetres that appear as dark spots to the naked eye; albite, commonly interstitial; rutile surrounded by titanite coronas; rare tourmaline (dravite); and fluorapatite, monazite and zircon crystals of a few micrometres in size.
Mg/(Mg + Fe²⁺ + Mn) = 0.014 → 0.172). In these garnet crystals, numerous inclusions of quartz, epidote and titanite (in the core of the crystals) and rutile (at their edges) can be observed, as well as rare omphacite (Fig. 4a), which has a lower Na content (triangles in Fig. 7) than the omphacite in the matrix (ID25a: Na = 0.414 ± 0.029 vs. 0.485 ± 0.017 apfu, respectively). The omphacite in the matrix is quite homogeneous (Fig. 7; e.g. ID25a: Jd₃₉.₅ ± 2.₆ Aeg₉.₁ ± 2.₄; Xₘ₉ = 0.809 ± 0.028); the slight apparent spread of its composition along a Jdₗₓ Aeg₋ₓ vector (Fig. 7) is presumably related to the uncertainty in the stoichiometric estimation of Fe³⁺ (see Sect. 3). In some slightly retrogressed eclogite samples (e.g. ID9), a decrease in jadeite content occurs at the edges of the omphacite crystals, where jadeite is exsolved in the form of albite (see “towards Ab” in Fig. 7).

The garnet glaucophanite bands (ID25b: Figs. 4b, S1b) are composed mainly of clinoamphibole, subhedral garnet, omphacite and quartz, with minor rutile, paragonite, K-feldspar and late albite. The garnet crystals, generally smaller than those in the eclogite bands, are however similar in composition and zoning (ID25b in Fig. 6b vs. ID25a in Fig. 6a). They enclose minute inclusions of quartz, epidote, titanite, rutile, apatite and rare amphibole including glaucophane (ID9 in Table 2). Omphacite also has a composition quite similar to that of the neighbouring eclogite layers (ID25b vs. ID25a in Fig. 7; Jd₃₇.₁ ± 4.₀ Aeg₁₃.₆ ± 3.₇; Xₘ₉ = 0.856 ± 0.030). The amphibole crystals in the matrix, typically 0.2 mm in size, generally consist of a homogeneous nucleus of glaucophane (Gln in Fig. 4b; circles in Fig. 8c, d; Table 2), on which have grown, parallel to the foliation, overgrowths of a slightly zoned Ca-Na amphibole, katophorite or winchite (kw in Fig. 4b; Fig. 8a, b; squares in Fig. 8c, d; Table 2). Each crystal, thus elongated parallel to the foliation, is also bordered by a zone a few micrometres thick whose composition is Ca-rich and varies from pargasite/magnesio-hornblende to actinolite (Act in Fig. 4b; “+” in Fig. 8c, d). Actinolite also occurs along late fractures that cut the foliation. This general evolution from Na to Ca species is accompanied by a decrease in Xₘ₉ to reach Fe²⁺-rich ferrous species. Amphibole is also present around garnet, forming microcoronas of (ferro-)katophorite or (ferro-)pargasite (“×” in Fig. 8c, d; Table 2). Some large crystals of (ferro-)pargasite included in garnet seem to belong to the same generation of Fe-rich amphibole as that in the microcoronas (ID1 in Table 2; triangles in Fig. 8c, d); like the latter, they would have developed late at the expense of the host garnet rather than being trapped during its growth.

The generally fine-grained metabasites of the numerous lenses stretched within the mica schists (Fig. 3a) are essentially composed of subhedral crystals of garnet, commonly < 1 mm in size, and amphibole forming coarse symplectites with albite; clinozoisite (or epidote); and, incidentally, quartz, paragonite, apatite and titanite with internal relics of rutile (Figs. 4c, d, S1c, d; e.g. samples ID16 and

ID33). The composition and zonation of the garnet crystals are very similar to those of the well-preserved eclogites, in particular with a core rich in Mn (Fig. 6c vs. 6a; Fig. 6d); they also contain inclusions of epidote, quartz, amphibole and titanite. Ca-rich clinoamphibole, most commonly paragasite, magnesio-hornblende or actinolite (Fig. 8c), forms symplectites with albite (ca. Ab₉₉). As in some glaucophane eclogites (see above), amphibole also forms microcoronas of pargasitic composition around garnet (“×” in Fig. 8c, d) and is particularly Al- and Ca-rich, with a high Fe²⁺ content (ID16: Xₘ²⁺ = Fe²⁺/(Fe²⁺ + Mn + Mg) = 0.429 ± 0.029 vs. 0.313 ± 0.017 for the matrix amphibole). These chemical characteristics are clearly related to the role of garnet as a reactant during the later amphibole growth, as is typical in the retrogression of eclogites worldwide.

In some samples, particularly ID33, some relict paragonite is surrounded by a corona of clinozoisite (Figs. 4d, S1d). We attempted to balance this coronitic reaction using the least-squares method (see Sect. 3):

$$0.516\text{Pg} + 0.313\text{Cam} + 1.358\text{Qz} \rightarrow 1\text{Czo} + 1.140\text{Ab} \\ + 0.067\text{Kfs} + 0.844\text{H}_2\text{O} + 1\mathbf{R},$$

where R is the residual vector (Si₀.₀₀₀ Al⁺₀.₀₀₂ Ti⁻₀.₀₀₆ Fe⁻₀.₀₈₁ Mn⁺₀.₀₀₀ Mg⁻₀.₇₇₄ Ca⁺₁.₅₀₈ Na⁻₀.₀₁₄ K⁻₀.₀₀₂). Although at first glance the result fits the observation, the large residuals for Ca and Mg indicate that one or more other reactants, now consumed (omphacite?), may have been involved in the reaction or that the latter took place in an open system.

These garnet amphibolites show notable differences from the glaucophane eclogites: absence of omphacite, presence of Ca-rich amphibole instead of Na or Na-Ca amphiboles, and ubiquitous albite. However, they also show remarkable similarities: similar composition and zoning of garnet crystals; presence of paragonite, quartz and rutile (as relics within titanite coronas); and ferro-pargasite coronas around garnet. It therefore appears clear that the garnet amphibolites are retrogression products of the eclogites, which is also supported by the presence in some partially retrogressed eclogite samples (e.g. ID9) of similar late microstructures (pargasite coronas around garnet, amphibole + albite symplectites and titanite coronas around rutile).

## 4.2 Mica schists

The mica schists have a satiny grey appearance and alternate with levels rich in quartz. Under the polarising microscope, they are composed as follows (in order of decreasing abundance): quartz; white micas; garnet crystals that can reach a few millimetres in diameter; clinozoisite in small euhedral crystals; chlorite, which commonly forms small aggregates of several millimetres that appear as dark spots to the naked eye; albite, commonly interstitial; rutile surrounded by titanite coronas; rare tourmaline (dravite); and fluorapatite, monazite and zircon crystals of a few micrometres in size.
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

**Figure 6.** Garnet composition and zoning in metabasites. (a–c) Garnet zoning in the eclogite (a) and garnet glaucophanite (b) bands of sample ID25 and in the garnet amphibolite ID16 (c). The analytical EMP spots are shown on the *x* axis; a few of these that touched inclusions in the garnet have been removed. (d) Barycentric plot of EMP analyses of garnet from the studied metabasites (mol % of spessartine, almandine, grossular and pyrope end-members). All four plots show more Mn in the cores and more Mg at the rims.

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

**Figure 7.** Omphacite composition in eclogites. Barycentric plot of EMP analyses of omphacite from the studied eclogites (mol % of jadeite, aegirine and other (“Aug”) end-members). Triangles: early omphacite trapped in garnet; circles: omphacite in matrix. A slight scatter along the vector $J_{d+x} A_{eg-x}$ is interpreted as being due to the uncertainty in the estimation of $Fe^{3+}$; on the other hand, the tendency for jadeite depletion in sample ID9 results from the partial exsolution of jadeite in the form of albite, present in this sample near the edges of the omphacite crystals (“towards Ab”).

In sample ID13 (Figs. 4e, f, S1e), phengite is the dominant mica ($Ms_{58} FCel_{7} Cel_{23} Pg_{10} Mrg_{1}$), with an average Si content of $6.573 \pm 0.206$ apfu. The large standard deviation of this value reflects a significant variation in the phenegite substitution ($Si_{+1} Al^{IV}_{1} Al^{VI}_{1}$ (Mg, Fe)$_{+1}$), which decreases towards the edge of the crystals (Fig. 4e, f). Paragonite ($Pg_{90} Ms_{8} FCel_{1} Cel_{0} Mrg_{1}$) is inferred to be residual, as it occurs in the form of rare lamellae preserved in phengite flakes, whereas it is absent in the albite-rich matrix (Fig. 4e, f). Garnet forms small, slightly zoned infra-millimetre crystals (on average, $Alm_{63} Grs_{24} Prp_{8} Sps_{4} Adr_{1}$), with a core richer than the rim in Ca and Mn, reflecting typical prograde growth; in places, it is atoll-shaped with a “lagoon” of phen-

gite and quartz (Fig. 4e). Chlorite crystals generally form multi-millimetre radiating clusters (Fig. 4f), suggesting that they replaced an earlier mineral, such as biotite or chloritoid; the chlorite is a clinochlore with $X_{Mg} = 0.586 \pm 0.020$ and $Si = 2.745 \pm 0.070$ apfu. Subhedral microcrystals of clinozoisite ($X_{Fe^{3+}} = 0.119 \pm 0.006$) and titanite characteristically enveloping relics of rutile (Fig. 4e, f) are common.

## 4.3 Orthogneiss

The gneiss of the southern part of the island is a fairly homogeneous, equigranular and leucocratic rock with an average millimetric grain size. It shows strong foliation and less pronounced stretching lineation. Sample ID17 (Figs. 4g,
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

**Figure 6.** Garnet composition and zoning in metabasites. (a–c) Garnet zoning in the eclogite (a) and garnet glaucophanite (b) bands of sample ID25 and in the garnet amphibolite ID16 (c). The analytical EMP spots are shown on the *x* axis; a few of these that touched inclusions in the garnet have been removed. (d) Barycentric plot of EMP analyses of garnet from the studied metabasites (mol % of spessartine, almandine, grossular and pyrope end-members). All four plots show more Mn in the cores and more Mg at the rims.

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

**Figure 7.** Omphacite composition in eclogites. Barycentric plot of EMP analyses of omphacite from the studied eclogites (mol % of jadeite, aegirine and other (“Aug”) end-members). Triangles: early omphacite trapped in garnet; circles: omphacite in matrix. A slight scatter along the vector $J_{d+x} A_{eg-x}$ is interpreted as being due to the uncertainty in the estimation of $Fe^{3+}$; on the other hand, the tendency for jadeite depletion in sample ID9 results from the partial exsolution of jadeite in the form of albite, present in this sample near the edges of the omphacite crystals (“towards Ab”).

In sample ID13 (Figs. 4e, f, S1e), phengite is the dominant mica ($Ms_{58} FCel_{7} Cel_{23} Pg_{10} Mrg_{1}$), with an average Si content of $6.573 \pm 0.206$ apfu. The large standard deviation of this value reflects a significant variation in the phenegite substitution ($Si_{+1} Al^{IV}_{1} Al^{VI}_{1}$ (Mg, Fe)$_{+1}$), which decreases towards the edge of the crystals (Fig. 4e, f). Paragonite ($Pg_{90} Ms_{8} FCel_{1} Cel_{0} Mrg_{1}$) is inferred to be residual, as it occurs in the form of rare lamellae preserved in phengite flakes, whereas it is absent in the albite-rich matrix (Fig. 4e, f). Garnet forms small, slightly zoned infra-millimetre crystals (on average, $Alm_{63} Grs_{24} Prp_{8} Sps_{4} Adr_{1}$), with a core richer than the rim in Ca and Mn, reflecting typical prograde growth; in places, it is atoll-shaped with a “lagoon” of phen-

gite and quartz (Fig. 4e). Chlorite crystals generally form multi-millimetre radiating clusters (Fig. 4f), suggesting that they replaced an earlier mineral, such as biotite or chloritoid; the chlorite is a clinochlore with $X_{Mg} = 0.586 \pm 0.020$ and $Si = 2.745 \pm 0.070$ apfu. Subhedral microcrystals of clinozoisite ($X_{Fe^{3+}} = 0.119 \pm 0.006$) and titanite characteristically enveloping relics of rutile (Fig. 4e, f) are common.

## 4.3 Orthogneiss

The gneiss of the southern part of the island is a fairly homogeneous, equigranular and leucocratic rock with an average millimetric grain size. It shows strong foliation and less pronounced stretching lineation. Sample ID17 (Figs. 4g,
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

**Figure 8.** Amphibole composition and zoning in metabasites. (a, b) Zoning of two amphibole crystals with a glaucophane nucleus and overgrowths of (ferro-)katophorite to (ferro-)pargasite, from garnet glaucophanite ID9 (a) and ID25b (b). The EMP analytical spots are shown on the *x* axis. (c) EMP analyses of amphibole in the classification diagrams of Hawthorne et al. (2012); the three plots of Site A vs. Site C are at different levels (> 0.75, intermediate, < 0.25) along the axis of Site B, best imagined as perpendicular to the plots; the selected segments of the first two plots overlap. (d) The same amphibole analyses in the AlVI–AlIV diagram, where the (AlVI/(AlVI+AlIV)) isopleths radiate from their origin at “tremolite” and are correlated with the predicted *P/T* ratio, which decreases clockwise (represented by the curved black arrow), thus showing the effect of *P* and *T* on the amphibole composition; red arrows: theoretical evolution of the amphiboles in sample ID25b along the *P*–*T* path of Fig. 9b, following the solid-solution model of Green et al. (2016) (see text). For (e) and (d), the colour indicates the sample provenance and the symbol style indicates the microstructural location (see the incorporated legend). The Fe<sub>-x</sub><sup>2+</sup>Fe<sub>+x</sub><sup>3+</sup>O<sub>+0.5x</sub> vector shows, for some analyses, the translation that occurs when the estimated value of Fe<sup>3+</sup> goes from 0 to 0.1 × Fe<sub>tot</sub>. The names in capital letters are the amphibole “root names” (e.g. “PARGASITE”), which actually consist of several end-member species (e.g. ferro-pargasite and pargasite); all glaucophanes have X<sub>Mg</sub> > 0.5, and most of the other clinoamphiboles have X<sub>Mg</sub> < 0.5 and therefore take the prefix “ferro-”.
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

**Figure 8.** Amphibole composition and zoning in metabasites. (a, b) Zoning of two amphibole crystals with a glaucophane nucleus and overgrowths of (ferro-)kataphorite to (ferro-)pargasite, from garnet glaucophanite ID9 (a) and ID25b (b). The EMP analytical spots are shown on the *x* axis. (c) EMP analyses of amphibole in the classification diagrams of Hawthorne et al. (2012); the three plots of Site A vs. Site C are at different levels (> 0.75, intermediate, < 0.25) along the axis of Site B, best imagined as perpendicular to the plots; the selected segments of the first two plots overlap. (d) The same amphibole analyses in the Al<sup>VI</sup>-Al<sup>IV</sup> diagram, where the (Al<sup>VI</sup> / (Al<sup>VI</sup> + Al<sup>IV</sup>)) isopleths radiate from their origin at “tremolite” and are correlated with the predicted *P/T* ratio, which decreases clockwise (represented by the curved black arrow), thus showing the effect of *P* and *T* on the amphibole composition; red arrows: theoretical evolution of the amphiboles in sample ID25b along the *P*-*T* path of Fig. 9b, following the solid-solution model of Green et al. (2016) (see text). For (e) and (d), the colour indicates the sample provenance and the symbol style indicates the microstructural location (see the incorporated legend). The Fe<sup>2+</sup><sub>-x</sub>Fe<sup>3+</sup><sub>+x</sub>O<sub>+0.5x</sub> vector shows, for some analyses, the translation that occurs when the estimated value of Fe<sup>3+</sup> goes from 0 to 0.1 × Fe<sub>tot</sub>. The names in capital letters are the amphibole “root names” (e.g. “PARGASITE”), which actually consist of several end-member species (e.g. ferro-pargasite and pargasite); all glaucophanes have X<sub>Mg</sub> > 0.5, and most of the other clinoamphiboles have X<sub>Mg</sub> < 0.5 and therefore take the prefix “ferro-”.
S1f) belongs to a leucocratic facies, rich in white mica and poor in biotite, located near the contact with mica schists. Its main minerals are quartz and phengite (Ms60 Fe3+–Ms7 FCel24 Cel6 Pg2 Mrg1) with an average Si content of 6.695 ± 0.076 apfu, microcline (Or94.0 Ab5.5 An0.0 Cls0.5), and albite (Or0.6 Ab99.0 An0.4 Cls0.0). The feldspars show ex-solution lamellae of K-feldspar in the albite (i.e. antiperthite) and, less commonly, of albite in the microcline (i.e. perthite; Fig. 4g), which also frequently shows the Carlsbad twin. Some aggregates, less than a millimetre in size, are formed of chlorite + garnet ± phengite ± K-feldspar + iron oxide (Fig. 4h). The chlorite is a chamosite with $X_{Mg}$ = 0.062 to 0.068 and Si = 5.9 to 6.3 apfu; it shows a significant amount of potassium (1.2 wt % to 2.0 wt % K2O), suggesting that it is derived from the breakdown of former biotite. The garnet in these aggregates is concentrated at their margins, particularly near plagioclase grains, but without forming regular coronas (Fig. 4h). It has a peculiar Ca-rich composition (Grs58.8 ± 1.4 Alm34.0 ± 1.7 Adr6.3 ± 2.1 Sps0.7 ± 0.4 Prp0.1 ± 0.0) and may contain a small amount of hydrogarnet (Si = 2.980 ± 0.017 apfu). Monazite, fluorapatite and zircon are accessory minerals.

# 5 Discussion

## 5.1 Evidence for high-pressure blueschist-facies metamorphism at Dumet Island

### 5.1.1 Eclogite and garnet glaucophanite

The *P*–*T* pseudosections calculated for the eclogite and garnet glaucophanite bands of sample ID25 (Fig. 9a and b, respectively) make it possible to unravel the metamorphic history of this sample by combining the stability field of the different parageneses observed and the most significant isopleths (see Sect. 3 for the method). Isopleths depending on Fe³⁺, either directly ($X_{Fe^{3+}}$ in epidote) or indirectly ($X_{Fe^{2+}}$ in omphacite), were discarded as too uncertain, since they depend both on the value assigned to the extra amount of O linked to Fe³⁺ in the modelled bulk-rock composition and on the imprecise estimation of Fe³⁺ in the minerals by stoichiometry. To specify the *P*–*T* evolution of sample ID25, we have therefore used the isopleths of omphacite and garnet (Fig. 9c, d), which we present here with the uncertainty interval of ±1σ that results from the EMP analyses of the minerals. Other sources of uncertainty are difficult to quantify and therefore cannot be taken into account, such as those related to the thermodynamic data or to the bulk-rock composition; Palin et al. (2016) attempted to assess these uncertainties, which they estimated to be of the order of ±1 kbar and ±50 °C.

Three successive parageneses were investigated in this way, in each of the two levels of sample ID25.

a. The first paragenesis consists of the core of the garnet crystals and their inclusions; it gives information on the prograde metamorphism. The *P*–*T* co-stability field of these inclusions (titanite, Jd-poor omphacite, epidote, quartz, etc.) with their host garnet is outlined in blue in Fig. 9c–d. The $X_{Fe}$ and $X_{Mn}$ isopleths of the garnet, as well as the $X_{Na}$ of some early omphacite trapped in garnet of eclogite ID25a (triangles in Fig. 7), allow us to constrain the *P*–*T* conditions of this stage. However, the interpretation of these results is complicated by several difficulties: the inclusions were probably not all trapped at the same time, certain elements (Mn, Ca) were fractionated during garnet growth, the garnet may have undergone a late partial chemical homogenisation, etc. Perhaps these problems may explain why the Ca-in-garnet isopleth for both rocks gave *P*–*T* conditions slightly outside the stability fields of this paragenesis. Despite these difficulties, one interesting feature should be noted: the isopleths marking the growth of the garnet core are shifted to lower-grade and earlier blueschist-facies conditions in eclogite ID25a compared to glaucophanite ID25b, where the modelled modal amount of garnet (not shown) increases only late, near the peak, in the Gln–Grt–Ep–Chl–Qz–Ttn field (Fig. 9b), probably explaining the relatively small size of the garnet crystals in this glaucophanite level (see Fig. 6b vs. 6a).

b. The second paragenesis is formed by the matrix minerals in contact with the rims of the garnet crystals; it allows the assessment of the *P*–*T* conditions at the peak of metamorphism. The Mn-in-garnet isopleth, with very low values ($X_{Mn}$ ≈ 0.01), is of no help here, as it gives large intervals covering almost the entire stability domain of the paragenesis, outlined in red in Fig. 9c–d; again, the Ca-in-garnet isopleth gave *P*–*T* conditions slightly outside the stability domain of sample ID25a. For both samples, the stability domain of the main paragenesis, combined with the isopleths, gives conditions of the order of 16 kbar and 620 °C, for the *P* and *T* peaks, respectively (Fig. 9).

c. The third paragenesis consists of the later retrograde minerals (actinolite, albite, chlorite, titanite, etc.), which appeared in the form of microcoronas or symplectites at the expense of the second paragenesis. Its stability domain within the greenschist facies (framed in green in Fig. 9c–d) allows us to set a milestone on the retrograde path and confers a clockwise shape to the whole *P*–*T* path.

### 5.1.2 Amphibole evolution in the garnet glaucophanite

While modelling the *P*–*T* pseudosections, we have not used amphibole isopleths ($X_{Fe}$, $X_{NaA}$, $X_{NaM4}$, etc.) because of the complexity and therefore the low reliability of the available solid-solution models, the impossibility of accurately evalu-
S1f) belongs to a leucocratic facies, rich in white mica and poor in biotite, located near the contact with mica schists. Its main minerals are quartz and phengite (Ms60 Fe3+–Ms7 FCel24 Cel6 Pg2 Mrg1) with an average Si content of 6.695 ± 0.076 apfu, microcline (Or94.0 Ab5.5 An0.0 Cls0.5), and albite (Or0.6 Ab99.0 An0.4 Cls0.0). The feldspars show ex-solution lamellae of K-feldspar in the albite (i.e. antiperthite) and, less commonly, of albite in the microcline (i.e. perthite; Fig. 4g), which also frequently shows the Carlsbad twin. Some aggregates, less than a millimetre in size, are formed of chlorite + garnet ± phengite ± K-feldspar + iron oxide (Fig. 4h). The chlorite is a chamosite with $X_{Mg}$ = 0.062 to 0.068 and Si = 5.9 to 6.3 apfu; it shows a significant amount of potassium (1.2 wt % to 2.0 wt % K2O), suggesting that it is derived from the breakdown of former biotite. The garnet in these aggregates is concentrated at their margins, particularly near plagioclase grains, but without forming regular coronas (Fig. 4h). It has a peculiar Ca-rich composition (Grs58.8 ± 1.4 Alm34.0 ± 1.7 Adr6.3 ± 2.1 Sps0.7 ± 0.4 Prp0.1 ± 0.0) and may contain a small amount of hydrogarnet (Si = 2.980 ± 0.017 apfu). Monazite, fluorapatite and zircon are accessory minerals.

# 5 Discussion

## 5.1 Evidence for high-pressure blueschist-facies metamorphism at Dumet Island

### 5.1.1 Eclogite and garnet glaucophanite

The *P*–*T* pseudosections calculated for the eclogite and garnet glaucophanite bands of sample ID25 (Fig. 9a and b, respectively) make it possible to unravel the metamorphic history of this sample by combining the stability field of the different parageneses observed and the most significant isopleths (see Sect. 3 for the method). Isopleths depending on Fe3+, either directly ($X_{Fe^{3+}}$ in epidote) or indirectly ($X_{Fe^{2+}}$ in omphacite), were discarded as too uncertain, since they depend both on the value assigned to the extra amount of O linked to Fe3+ in the modelled bulk-rock composition and on the imprecise estimation of Fe3+ in the minerals by stoichiometry. To specify the *P*–*T* evolution of sample ID25, we have therefore used the isopleths of omphacite and garnet (Fig. 9c, d), which we present here with the uncertainty interval of ±1σ that results from the EMP analyses of the minerals. Other sources of uncertainty are difficult to quantify and therefore cannot be taken into account, such as those related to the thermodynamic data or to the bulk-rock composition; Palin et al. (2016) attempted to assess these uncertainties, which they estimated to be of the order of ±1 kbar and ±50 °C.

Three successive parageneses were investigated in this way, in each of the two levels of sample ID25.

a. The first paragenesis consists of the core of the garnet crystals and their inclusions; it gives information on the prograde metamorphism. The *P*–*T* co-stability field of these inclusions (titanite, Jd-poor omphacite, epidote, quartz, etc.) with their host garnet is outlined in blue in Fig. 9c–d. The $X_{Fe}$ and $X_{Mn}$ isopleths of the garnet, as well as the $X_{Na}$ of some early omphacite trapped in garnet of eclogite ID25a (triangles in Fig. 7), allow us to constrain the *P*–*T* conditions of this stage. However, the interpretation of these results is complicated by several difficulties: the inclusions were probably not all trapped at the same time, certain elements (Mn, Ca) were fractionated during garnet growth, the garnet may have undergone a late partial chemical homogenisation, etc. Perhaps these problems may explain why the Ca-in-garnet isopleth for both rocks gave *P*–*T* conditions slightly outside the stability fields of this paragenesis. Despite these difficulties, one interesting feature should be noted: the isopleths marking the growth of the garnet core are shifted to lower-grade and earlier blueschist-facies conditions in eclogite ID25a compared to glaucophanite ID25b, where the modelled modal amount of garnet (not shown) increases only late, near the peak, in the Gln–Grt–Ep–Chl–Qz–Ttn field (Fig. 9b), probably explaining the relatively small size of the garnet crystals in this glaucophanite level (see Fig. 6b vs. 6a).

b. The second paragenesis is formed by the matrix minerals in contact with the rims of the garnet crystals; it allows the assessment of the *P*–*T* conditions at the peak of metamorphism. The Mn-in-garnet isopleth, with very low values ($X_{Mn}$ ≈ 0.01), is of no help here, as it gives large intervals covering almost the entire stability domain of the paragenesis, outlined in red in Fig. 9c–d; again, the Ca-in-garnet isopleth gave *P*–*T* conditions slightly outside the stability domain of sample ID25a. For both samples, the stability domain of the main paragenesis, combined with the isopleths, gives conditions of the order of 16 kbar and 620 °C, for the *P* and *T* peaks, respectively (Fig. 9).

c. The third paragenesis consists of the later retrograde minerals (actinolite, albite, chlorite, titanite, etc.), which appeared in the form of microcoronas or symplectites at the expense of the second paragenesis. Its stability domain within the greenschist facies (framed in green in Fig. 9c–d) allows us to set a milestone on the retrograde path and confers a clockwise shape to the whole *P*–*T* path.

### 5.1.2 Amphibole evolution in the garnet glaucophanite

While modelling the *P*–*T* pseudosections, we have not used amphibole isopleths ($X_{Fe}$, $X_{NaA}$, $X_{NaM4}$, etc.) because of the complexity and therefore the low reliability of the available solid-solution models, the impossibility of accurately evalu-
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>Figure 9</figcaption></figure>

**Figure 9.** P–T pseudosections. (a, c) Pseudosection (a) and isopleths (c) for the epidote-rich eclogite band (sample ID25a). (b, d) Pseudosection (b) and isopleths (d) for the garnet–glaucophanite band (sample ID25b); A: apex of the solvus between glaucophane (Gln) + Ca–Na amphibole (Amp) (see text). (e) Pseudosection for mica schist (sample ID13). The minerals are listed in decreasing order of abundance, the ones in brackets being of negligible quantity (< 2 vol %). The Ab = Jd + Qz univariant curve is plotted in (e) to show the extension of the stability domain of albite (see Sect. 5.4). The thick curved grey arrow is the P–T trajectory derived from the modelling of sample ID25. The orange star indicates the main deformation event.
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>Figure 9</figcaption></figure>

**Figure 9.** P–T pseudosections. (a, c) Pseudosection (a) and isopleths (c) for the epidote-rich eclogite band (sample ID25a). (b, d) Pseudosection (b) and isopleths (d) for the garnet–glaucophanite band (sample ID25b); A: apex of the solvus between glaucophane (Gln) + Ca–Na amphibole (Amp) (see text). (e) Pseudosection for mica schist (sample ID13). The minerals are listed in decreasing order of abundance, the ones in brackets being of negligible quantity (< 2 vol %). The Ab = Jd + Qz univariant curve is plotted in (e) to show the extension of the stability domain of albite (see Sect. 5.4). The thick curved grey arrow is the P–T trajectory derived from the modelling of sample ID25. The orange star indicates the main deformation event.
ating Fe³⁺ in amphibole (see Sect. 3), and also the great variability in the composition of amphiboles depending on their microstructural position in the rock (Fig. 8). Nevertheless, the modelling of sample ID25b gives interesting indications regarding the evolution of amphiboles in the garnet glaucophanites of Île Dumet. The solid-solution model of Green et al. (2016) considers three types of amphiboles, namely a glaucophane, a (ferro-)actinolite, and finally a Ca or Ca-Na amphibole – which we have named “Amp” in the pseudosections, although the THERMOCALC package calls it “hb”, since in our case it is not strictly speaking a hornblende. The chemical evolution of these amphiboles along the P–T trajectory has been modelled for sample ID25b and is shown in the diagram in Fig. 8d (red arrows). This confirms that glaucophane “Gln” was formed during the prograde path, while Na–Ca amphibole “Amp” (katophorite/winchite) appeared near the T peak, with more katophorite than winchite components in the higher-T conditions. Between Gln and Amp, the model predicts a solvus, which is indeed clearly manifested by the presence of a gap in the composition of the amphiboles (Fig. 8c, d) and by a sharp transition in the amphibole crystals between the glaucophane nuclei and the katophorite/winchite overgrowths (Gln and kw, respectively, in Fig. 4b). The rock ID25b should have evolved within the P–T space through this Gln–Amp solvus (i.e. through the Grt Gln Amp Omp Qz Rt ± Ep fields of Fig. 9b) and therefore below the solvus apex (point A in Fig. 9b), at P < 17.3 kbar and T < 607 °C; otherwise the transition between the two amphiboles would have been gradual. The model also suggests another miscibility gap between Ca amphibole (Amp) and ferro-actinolite (Act); although less obvious, this Amp–Act solvus is also manifested for sample ID25b by a lower density of analytical points in the composition diagrams (between the red squares and red plusses in Fig. 8c, d), as well as by a sharp transition between katophorite/winchite and ferro-actinolite, which commonly forms a thin but contrasting border at the edge of the crystals (“Act” in Fig. 4b).

The evolution of the amphiboles results in a global clockwise trajectory in the AlVI–AlIV diagram (Fig. 8d), which mimics the clockwise trajectory of the rocks in the P–T diagram (Fig. 9b, d): since Al in the tetrahedral site of the silicates is favoured by T and hindered by P, the AlVI/AlIV ratio is indeed roughly correlated with the P/T ratio (e.g. Smith, 1988).

Katophorite/winchite overgrowths on glaucophane nuclei are oriented parallel to the foliation (Fig. 4b). This indicates the existence of an important episode of plastic deformation, mainly by diffusion creep of the amphibole crystals, under P–T conditions close to the Gln–Amp transition (see above) and therefore close to the peak (orange stars in Fig. 9). This tectonic episode could reflect a more global geodynamic event that led to the end of subduction and the beginning of exhumation. Whatever the cause, this deformation contributed to the transposition parallel to the foliation of the centimetre-scale banding observed in the glaucophane

eclogites (i.e. samples ID1, ID9, ID25). Even if it can be partially inherited from a magmatic layering, this banding seems to be largely elaborated by mineral segregation during metamorphism, since each type of band, eclogitic and glaucophanitic, corresponds to normative compositions of incompatible magmatic rocks, oversaturated with labradorite and undersaturated with andesite, respectively (Table 1). Incidentally, Smith (1988) argued for “mechanical segregation” into bands that produced peculiar bulk-rock compositions in some Norwegian eclogites. The rare-earth-element (REE) profile normalised to chondrites is similar in both cases (Fig. 5) but with a slight enrichment of REEs for eclogite bands relative to those rich in glaucophane. This difference can be explained by the abundance of epidote in eclogite levels, as epidotes are known to readily fix light REEs in the form of allanite and/or dissakisite end-members in solid solution, especially in eclogites and glaucophanites (Gieré and Sorensen, 2004, p. 461). The affinity of Eu for Ca-bearing minerals, including epidote, may also explain the slightly positive Eu anomaly of the eclogite band, symmetrical to the slightly negative anomaly of the glaucophane band.

### 5.1.3 Mica schists

The last P–T pseudosection (Fig. 9e) shows the retrograde evolution of mica schist sample ID33, taken near the metabasite lenses on the north of the island (see Sect. 4.2). The HP paragenesis, composed of phengite, quartz, garnet, rutile, biotite and paragonite, has undergone large retrograde changes, notably a decrease in phengitic substitution at the margins of the white mica flakes, the disappearance of paragonite which remains only as isolated lamellae in phengite, the development of albite (Ab98) and the formation of chlorite (Fig. 4e, f; Sect. 4.2). The pseudosection suggests that chlorite was formed here from biotite, whereas elsewhere in the Vilaine estuary and on the island of Groix, it generally developed at the expense of chloritoid (see below). All these changes agree reasonably well with the retrograde P–T path derived from the glaucophane eclogite ID25 (Fig. 9).

## 5.2 The Dumet Island and the Vilaine estuary: the equivalent of Groix Island

The HP metamorphic rocks of Dumet Island show striking analogies with those of Groix Island and the Bois-de-Céné region, where glaucophane-bearing rocks are also boudinaged within phengite-bearing mica schists. As Dumet Island is isolated in the Vilaine estuary, it is difficult to examine its geological relationships with the mainland. However, several geological formations outcropping on the north and south banks of the Vilaine estuary are similar to those of Dumet, Groix and Bois-de-Céné, as summarised here:

a. The best-preserved *metabasite lenses* on Dumet Island are similar to some glaucophane eclogites on Groix Island. They have undergone a comparable P–T his-
ating Fe³⁺ in amphibole (see Sect. 3), and also the great variability in the composition of amphiboles depending on their microstructural position in the rock (Fig. 8). Nevertheless, the modelling of sample ID25b gives interesting indications regarding the evolution of amphiboles in the garnet glaucophanites of Île Dumet. The solid-solution model of Green et al. (2016) considers three types of amphiboles, namely a glaucophane, a (ferro-)actinolite, and finally a Ca or Ca-Na amphibole – which we have named “Amp” in the pseudosections, although the THERMOCALC package calls it “hb”, since in our case it is not strictly speaking a hornblende. The chemical evolution of these amphiboles along the *P*–*T* trajectory has been modelled for sample ID25b and is shown in the diagram in Fig. 8d (red arrows). This confirms that glaucophane “Gln” was formed during the prograde path, while Na–Ca amphibole “Amp” (katophorite/winchite) appeared near the *T* peak, with more katophorite than winchite components in the higher-*T* conditions. Between Gln and Amp, the model predicts a solvus, which is indeed clearly manifested by the presence of a gap in the composition of the amphiboles (Fig. 8c, d) and by a sharp transition in the amphibole crystals between the glaucophane nuclei and the katophorite/winchite overgrowths (Gln and kw, respectively, in Fig. 4b). The rock ID25b should have evolved within the *P*–*T* space through this Gln–Amp solvus (i.e. through the Grt Gln Amp Omp Qz Rt ± Ep fields of Fig. 9b) and therefore below the solvus apex (point A in Fig. 9b), at *P* < 17.3 kbar and *T* < 607 °C; otherwise the transition between the two amphiboles would have been gradual. The model also suggests another miscibility gap between Ca amphibole (Amp) and ferro-actinolite (Act); although less obvious, this Amp–Act solvus is also manifested for sample ID25b by a lower density of analytical points in the composition diagrams (between the red squares and red plusses in Fig. 8c, d), as well as by a sharp transition between katophorite/winchite and ferro-actinolite, which commonly forms a thin but contrasting border at the edge of the crystals (“Act” in Fig. 4b).

The evolution of the amphiboles results in a global clockwise trajectory in the AlVI–AlIV diagram (Fig. 8d), which mimics the clockwise trajectory of the rocks in the *P*–*T* diagram (Fig. 9b, d): since Al in the tetrahedral site of the silicates is favoured by *T* and hindered by *P*, the AlVI / AlIV ratio is indeed roughly correlated with the *P/T* ratio (e.g. Smith, 1988).

Katophorite/winchite overgrowths on glaucophane nuclei are oriented parallel to the foliation (Fig. 4b). This indicates the existence of an important episode of plastic deformation, mainly by diffusion creep of the amphibole crystals, under *P*–*T* conditions close to the Gln–Amp transition (see above) and therefore close to the peak (orange stars in Fig. 9). This tectonic episode could reflect a more global geodynamic event that led to the end of subduction and the beginning of exhumation. Whatever the cause, this deformation contributed to the transposition parallel to the foliation of the centimetre-scale banding observed in the glaucophane

eclogites (i.e. samples ID1, ID9, ID25). Even if it can be partially inherited from a magmatic layering, this banding seems to be largely elaborated by mineral segregation during metamorphism, since each type of band, eclogitic and glaucophanitic, corresponds to normative compositions of incompatible magmatic rocks, oversaturated with labradorite and undersaturated with andesite, respectively (Table 1). Incidentally, Smith (1988) argued for “mechanical segregation” into bands that produced peculiar bulk-rock compositions in some Norwegian eclogites. The rare-earth-element (REE) profile normalised to chondrites is similar in both cases (Fig. 5) but with a slight enrichment of REEs for eclogite bands relative to those rich in glaucophane. This difference can be explained by the abundance of epidote in eclogite levels, as epidotes are known to readily fix light REEs in the form of allanite and/or dissakisite end-members in solid solution, especially in eclogites and glaucophanites (Gieré and Sorensen, 2004, p. 461). The affinity of Eu for Ca-bearing minerals, including epidote, may also explain the slightly positive Eu anomaly of the eclogite band, symmetrical to the slightly negative anomaly of the glaucophane band.

### 5.1.3 Mica schists

The last *P*–*T* pseudosection (Fig. 9e) shows the retrograde evolution of mica schist sample ID33, taken near the metabasite lenses on the north of the island (see Sect. 4.2). The HP paragenesis, composed of phengite, quartz, garnet, rutile, biotite and paragonite, has undergone large retrograde changes, notably a decrease in phengitic substitution at the margins of the white mica flakes, the disappearance of paragonite which remains only as isolated lamellae in phengite, the development of albite (Ab98) and the formation of chlorite (Fig. 4e, f; Sect. 4.2). The pseudosection suggests that chlorite was formed here from biotite, whereas elsewhere in the Vilaine estuary and on the island of Groix, it generally developed at the expense of chloritoid (see below). All these changes agree reasonably well with the retrograde *P*–*T* path derived from the glaucophane eclogite ID25 (Fig. 9).

## 5.2 The Dumet Island and the Vilaine estuary: the equivalent of Groix Island

The HP metamorphic rocks of Dumet Island show striking analogies with those of Groix Island and the Bois-de-Céné region, where glaucophane-bearing rocks are also boudinaged within phengite-bearing mica schists. As Dumet Island is isolated in the Vilaine estuary, it is difficult to examine its geological relationships with the mainland. However, several geological formations outcropping on the north and south banks of the Vilaine estuary are similar to those of Dumet, Groix and Bois-de-Céné, as summarised here:

a. The best-preserved *metabasite lenses* on Dumet Island are similar to some glaucophane eclogites on Groix Island. They have undergone a comparable *P*–*T* his-
tory but with a higher *P* gradient at Groix, as sug-
gested by the lower *T* at the metamorphic peak (about
520 °C at Groix (Bosse et al., 2002) vs. 620 °C at Dumet
(Fig. 9)) and the presence of lawsonite at Groix (e.g.
Ballèvre et al., 2003), whereas only epidote has been
observed at Dumet. They also show several genera-
tions of amphiboles, sodic (glaucophane), sodic-calcic
(katophorite, winchite) and finally calcic (magnesio-
hornblende, actinolite), recalling an evolution already
observed in the amphiboles of Groix and Bois-de-Céné
(Triboulet, 1978, 1991).

Metabasite lenses can also be observed around the
Vilaine estuary (e.g. 47.4248, -2.4561; 47.4411,
-2.4809; 47.5115, -2.5490; 47.5104, -2.5540;
47.5217, -2.7095). They are fine-grained foliated
rocks composed of millimetre-sized crystals of albite,
epidote, chlorite, Ca-rich clinoamphibole, almandine-
grossular-rich garnet crystals partly transformed into
Fe-rich chlorite along cracks and rims, and titanite
possibly containing relics of rutile and/or ilmenite.
These rocks are strongly modified by greenschist-
facies metamorphism, and no researcher has reported
eclogite- or blueschist-facies relics in them. However,
glaucophane has been observed in the form of detrital
grains in Quaternary and Cenozoic sediments of the
Vilaine estuary and its banks (Fig. 10b), at Pointe du
Touru near Mesquer, together with rutile (Chauris,
1997), at Pénestin, in association with chloritoid and
kyanite (Durand and Milon, 1955; Durand, 1960),
and on the estuarine seabed (Bouysse, 1966a, b).
Benjamin Rondeau (personal communication, 2022)
also observed loose blocks of retrogressed eclogite on
the shore at Piriac.

b. Although quite rare, (pluri)hectometric lenses of *serpentinite* can be found in the mica schists, both on the island of Groix (47.6531, -3.4927) and in the Bois-de-Céné region (46.9478, -1.8519; 46.9480, -1.8489; 46.9553, -1.8406; 46.9417, -1.7583; 46.9414, -1.7603). We did not observe any on Dumet Island, whose size is rather limited, but there are some indications of their presence elsewhere in the Vilaine estuary. Chromite and, incidentally, olivine have been reported in coastal sands at Cromenach and Bétahon, near Damgan (Fig. 10b; Chauris, 1982). Fuchsite was also reported by Baret (1898, p. 124) between Piriac and Mesquer, in the former La Roche Bleue quarry.

c. On the island of Groix and in the Bois-de-Céné region, metabasites and serpentinites are boudinaged within *phengite* ± *chloritoid* + *garnet mica schists*, which are the dominant rock type (e.g. Bosse et al., 2002). Chloritoid was not observed at Dumet. However, chloritoid-bearing mica schists are quite common elsewhere in the Vilaine estuary, where they were first described by Bar-

rois (1884), who related them to the mica schists of
the island of Groix, and then by Lacroix (1893–1910,
vol. 1, pp. 368, 391), who noted the frequent trans-
formation of chloritoid into chlorite. Later, chloritoid
was observed on the right bank of the estuary, on the
Rhuys peninsula (Rollando, 1951, 1952), in particular
at Grand Mont, Kervoyal, Penvins and Damgan (e.g.
47.4916, -2.6821; Fig. 10b), as well as on the left
bank, NW of the Guérande peninsula (Audren, 1974;
Audren et al., 1975). Phengite and minor paragonite
are also quite common in some mica schists of the
Rhuys peninsula (e.g. Augier et al., 2010), notably at
Kervoyal where we sampled and studied a mica schist
(47.5114, -2.5536) similar to, but apparently less ret-
rogressed than, those of Dumet Island (e.g. ID13); it
consists of quartz, phengite (Ms₃₇ Cel₂₂ FCel₁₈ Pg₁₁
Mrg₁; Si = 6.650 ± 0.146 apfu), garnet (Alm72.3±3.47
Gr13.2±3.48 Prp6.1±0.50 Sps8.4±0.74), chlorite (X_Mg =
0.392 ± 0.051), paragonite (Pg90 Ms₅ Mrg₂ FCel₂ Ti-
Ph₁), ilmenite, minor rutile and some albite formed dur-
ing retrogression.

d. A few *Mn-rich quartzite lenses* (quartz + spessartine ± piedmontite), 0.1 to 1 m in size, have been reported within the mica schists at Groix (e.g. Lacroix, 1888; Guy Cornen, personal communication, 2020) and Bois-de-Céné (Godard in Lahondère et al., 2009, p. 44). They are still unknown in the Vilaine estuary, where their discovery would strengthen the analogy with Groix.

e. Levels of *orthogneiss*, 0.1 to 1 m thick, are intercalated in the mica schists of the east coast of Groix, at Les Sables Rouges (Fig. S2; El Korh et al., 2012). They show structural and petrological similarities with the orthogneiss of Dumet Island (compare Figs. 3b and S2), where it is nevertheless much more abundant. The latter is also petrographically similar to that of Pénestin (Audren, 1974), located on the banks of the Vilaine estuary, about 12 km NE of Dumet Island (Fig. 10). Finally, some orthogneiss has also been observed at Bois-de-Céné, where it is very poorly exposed (Godard in Lahondère et al., 2009, p. 45).

These indices indicate that the blueschist-facies Groix Unit
is present not only on Dumet Island, but also on the banks
of the estuary where, however, the metabasites have been
completely retrogressed into greenschist-facies metabasite.
On the map in Fig. 10, we have drawn this formation so as
to include the various phengite and chloritoid occurrences
in the mica schists, assuming boundaries subparallel to the
schistosity strike.
tory but with a higher *P* gradient at Groix, as sug-
gested by the lower *T* at the metamorphic peak (about
520 °C at Groix (Bosse et al., 2002) vs. 620 °C at Dumet
(Fig. 9)) and the presence of lawsonite at Groix (e.g.
Ballèvre et al., 2003), whereas only epidote has been
observed at Dumet. They also show several genera-
tions of amphiboles, sodic (glaucophane), sodic-calcic
(katophorite, winchite) and finally calcic (magnesio-
hornblende, actinolite), recalling an evolution already
observed in the amphiboles of Groix and Bois-de-Céné
(Triboulet, 1978, 1991).

Metabasite lenses can also be observed around the
Vilaine estuary (e.g. 47.4248, -2.4561; 47.4411,
-2.4809; 47.5115, -2.5490; 47.5104, -2.5540;
47.5217, -2.7095). They are fine-grained foliated
rocks composed of millimetre-sized crystals of albite,
epidote, chlorite, Ca-rich clinoamphibole, almandine-
grossular-rich garnet crystals partly transformed into
Fe-rich chlorite along cracks and rims, and titanite
possibly containing relics of rutile and/or ilmenite.
These rocks are strongly modified by greenschist-
facies metamorphism, and no researcher has reported
eclogite- or blueschist-facies relics in them. However,
glaucophane has been observed in the form of detrital
grains in Quaternary and Cenozoic sediments of the
Vilaine estuary and its banks (Fig. 10b), at Pointe du
Touru near Mesquer, together with rutile (Chauris,
1997), at Pénestin, in association with chloritoid and
kyanite (Durand and Milon, 1955; Durand, 1960),
and on the estuarine seabed (Bouysse, 1966a, b).
Benjamin Rondeau (personal communication, 2022)
also observed loose blocks of retrogressed eclogite on
the shore at Piriac.

b. Although quite rare, (pluri)hectometric lenses of *serpentinite* can be found in the mica schists, both on the island of Groix (47.6531, -3.4927) and in the Bois-de-Céné region (46.9478, -1.8519; 46.9480, -1.8489; 46.9553, -1.8406; 46.9417, -1.7583; 46.9414, -1.7603). We did not observe any on Dumet Island, whose size is rather limited, but there are some indications of their presence elsewhere in the Vilaine estuary. Chromite and, incidentally, olivine have been reported in coastal sands at Cromenach and Bétahon, near Damgan (Fig. 10b; Chauris, 1982). Fuchsite was also reported by Baret (1898, p. 124) between Piriac and Mesquer, in the former La Roche Bleue quarry.

c. On the island of Groix and in the Bois-de-Céné region, metabasites and serpentinites are boudinaged within *phengite* ± *chloritoid* + *garnet mica schists*, which are the dominant rock type (e.g. Bosse et al., 2002). Chloritoid was not observed at Dumet. However, chloritoid-bearing mica schists are quite common elsewhere in the Vilaine estuary, where they were first described by Bar-

rois (1884), who related them to the mica schists of
the island of Groix, and then by Lacroix (1893–1910,
vol. 1, pp. 368, 391), who noted the frequent trans-
formation of chloritoid into chlorite. Later, chloritoid
was observed on the right bank of the estuary, on the
Rhuys peninsula (Rollando, 1951, 1952), in particular
at Grand Mont, Kervoyal, Penvins and Damgan (e.g.
47.4916, -2.6821; Fig. 10b), as well as on the left
bank, NW of the Guérande peninsula (Audren, 1974;
Audren et al., 1975). Phengite and minor paragonite
are also quite common in some mica schists of the
Rhuys peninsula (e.g. Augier et al., 2010), notably at
Kervoyal where we sampled and studied a mica schist
(47.5114, -2.5536) similar to, but apparently less ret-
rogressed than, those of Dumet Island (e.g. ID13); it
consists of quartz, phengite (Ms₃₇ Cel₂₂ FCel₁₈ Pg₁₁
Mrg₁; Si = 6.650 ± 0.146 apfu), garnet (Alm72.3±3.47
Gr13.2±3.48 Prp6.1±0.50 Sps8.4±0.74), chlorite (Xₘ₉ =
0.392 ± 0.051), paragonite (Pg90 Ms₅ Mrg₂ FCel₂ Ti-
Ph₁), ilmenite, minor rutile and some albite formed dur-
ing retrogression.

d. A few *Mn-rich quartzite lenses* (quartz + spessartine ± piedmontite), 0.1 to 1 m in size, have been reported within the mica schists at Groix (e.g. Lacroix, 1888; Guy Cornen, personal communication, 2020) and Bois-de-Céné (Godard in Lahondère et al., 2009, p. 44). They are still unknown in the Vilaine estuary, where their discovery would strengthen the analogy with Groix.

e. Levels of *orthogneiss*, 0.1 to 1 m thick, are intercalated in the mica schists of the east coast of Groix, at Les Sables Rouges (Fig. S2; El Korh et al., 2012). They show structural and petrological similarities with the orthogneiss of Dumet Island (compare Figs. 3b and S2), where it is nevertheless much more abundant. The latter is also petrographically similar to that of Pénestin (Audren, 1974), located on the banks of the Vilaine estuary, about 12 km NE of Dumet Island (Fig. 10). Finally, some orthogneiss has also been observed at Boisde-Céné, where it is very poorly exposed (Godard in Lahondère et al., 2009, p. 45).

These indices indicate that the blueschist-facies Groix Unit
is present not only on Dumet Island, but also on the banks
of the estuary where, however, the metabasites have been
completely retrogressed into greenschist-facies metabasite.
On the map in Fig. 10, we have drawn this formation so as
to include the various phengite and chloritoid occurrences
in the mica schists, assuming boundaries subparallel to the
schistosity strike.
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 10.** Dumet Island in the South Armorican context. Sketch geological maps of the South Armorican Domain (a) and the Vilaine estuary (b), based on existing geological maps at 1/50 000 and unpublished surveys. SSZ: Sarzeau Shear Zone. Geological formations are represented by light and dark shades of colour where they are located offshore (o) and inland (i), respectively.</figcaption></figure>

**5.3 Dumet Island in the South Armorican tectonic stack**

The "Groix Unit", at both Groix and Bois-de-Céné, has been interpreted as two klippen in the core of synformal structures, at the top of a tectonic stack showing a general flat-lying planar fabric with a WNW-ESE stretching lineation, largely disturbed by upper Carboniferous tectonics and granitic intrusions (e.g. Audren, 1990; Gapais et al., 1993; Burg et al., 1994; Le Hébel et al., 2002a; Turrillot et al., 2011). In interpreting Dumet Island and the western part of the Vilaine estuary as the geological equivalent of Groix Island, it is necessary to verify whether the same structural framework applies there. Below, we review the main subdivisions recognised in this stack from bottom to top and discuss whether they also occur in the Vilaine estuary:

a. *Morbihan migmatite unit.* At the base of the stack, cordierite and sillimanite migmatites derived from metapelites are intruded by anatectic granitoids (Audren and Le Métour, 1976; Brown, 1983; Audren, 1987; Jones and Brown, 1989, 1990; Audren and Tri-boulet, 1993; Brown and Dallmeyer, 1996; Marchildon and Brown, 2003; Johnson and Brown, 2004; Augier et al., 2010). These migmatites contain decametre-thick metasedimentary layers composed of banded calc-silicate rocks, little studied since Charles Barrois (1887, 1897) and Alfred Lacroix (1889, 1891) and whose min-

eralogy is reminiscent of that of skarns, with diopside, hornblende; plagioclase; epidote; scapolite; grossular-rich garnet; titanite; and, incidentally, calcite, vesuvianite, wollastonite and scheelite. P–T estimation of peak metamorphic conditions gave 8–10 kbar and 750–800 °C for the migmatites of this unit (Jones and Brown, 1989, 1990).

This lower unit is well known in the Gulf of Morbihan, to the NW of the Vilaine estuary, and is also well exposed to the SE, on both banks of the Loire estuary, in the regions of Saint-Nazaire and Saint-Brévin (e.g. Lacroix, 1889, 1891; Fig. 10). To the NE, it occupies the upstream part of the Vilaine estuary (Fig. 10b), where banded calc-silicate rocks with diopside, amphibole, epidote and grossular (Billiers, Pen Lan, Tréhiguer) occur within biotite + sillimanite mica schists and migmatitic gneisses (e.g. Audren, 1974, pp. 3-6); these calc-silicate rocks have long been confused with the metabasites of the downstream part of the estuary, which we now attribute to the HP Groix Unit (see below). The metasedimentary origin of the calc-silicate rocks is attested by some cipolin remnants (Coëtsurho, near Billiers: e.g. Barrois, 1897, p. 28; Audren, 1974; Audren et al., 1975), as is the case near Saint-Nazaire and Saint-Brévin further south (Lacroix, 1889, 1891). They are associated with amphibolites to which Tri-boulet and Audren (1985a, b) attributed a volcanic de-
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 10.** Dumet Island in the South Armorican context. Sketch geological maps of the South Armorican Domain (a) and the Vilaine estuary (b), based on existing geological maps at 1/50 000 and unpublished surveys. SSZ: Sarzeau Shear Zone. Geological formations are represented by light and dark shades of colour where they are located offshore (o) and inland (i), respectively.</figcaption></figure>

**5.3 Dumet Island in the South Armorican tectonic stack**

The "Groix Unit", at both Groix and Bois-de-Céné, has been interpreted as two klippen in the core of synformal structures, at the top of a tectonic stack showing a general flat-lying planar fabric with a WNW-ESE stretching lineation, largely disturbed by upper Carboniferous tectonics and granitic intrusions (e.g. Audren, 1990; Gapais et al., 1993; Burg et al., 1994; Le Hébel et al., 2002a; Turrillot et al., 2011). In interpreting Dumet Island and the western part of the Vilaine estuary as the geological equivalent of Groix Island, it is necessary to verify whether the same structural framework applies there. Below, we review the main subdivisions recognised in this stack from bottom to top and discuss whether they also occur in the Vilaine estuary:

a. *Morbihan migmatite unit.* At the base of the stack, cordierite and sillimanite migmatites derived from metapelites are intruded by anatectic granitoids (Audren and Le Métour, 1976; Brown, 1983; Audren, 1987; Jones and Brown, 1989, 1990; Audren and Tri-boulet, 1993; Brown and Dallmeyer, 1996; Marchildon and Brown, 2003; Johnson and Brown, 2004; Augier et al., 2010). These migmatites contain decametre-thick metasedimentary layers composed of banded calc-silicate rocks, little studied since Charles Barrois (1887, 1897) and Alfred Lacroix (1889, 1891) and whose min-

eralogy is reminiscent of that of skarns, with diopside, hornblende; plagioclase; epidote; scapolite; grossular-rich garnet; titanite; and, incidentally, calcite, vesuvianite, wollastonite and scheelite. P-T estimation of peak metamorphic conditions gave 8–10 kbar and 750–800 °C for the migmatites of this unit (Jones and Brown, 1989, 1990).

This lower unit is well known in the Gulf of Morbihan, to the NW of the Vilaine estuary, and is also well exposed to the SE, on both banks of the Loire estuary, in the regions of Saint-Nazaire and Saint-Brévin (e.g. Lacroix, 1889, 1891; Fig. 10). To the NE, it occupies the upstream part of the Vilaine estuary (Fig. 10b), where banded calc-silicate rocks with diopside, amphibole, epidote and grossular (Billiers, Pen Lan, Tréhiguer) occur within biotite + sillimanite mica schists and migmatitic gneisses (e.g. Audren, 1974, pp. 3-6); these calc-silicate rocks have long been confused with the metabasites of the downstream part of the estuary, which we now attribute to the HP Groix Unit (see below). The metasedimentary origin of the calc-silicate rocks is attested by some cipolin remnants (Coëtsurho, near Billiers: e.g. Barrois, 1897, p. 28; Audren, 1974; Audren et al., 1975), as is the case near Saint-Nazaire and Saint-Brévin further south (Lacroix, 1889, 1891). They are associated with amphibolites to which Tri-boulet and Audren (1985a, b) attributed a volcanic de-
trital origin but whose unusually high Ca content (Tri-
boulet and Audren, 1985c, p. 61) confirms a strong sed-
imentary carbonate supply.

The Morbihan migmatite unit is commonly roofed
by major gently dipping extensional shear zones (e.g.
"Sarzeau Shear Zone": SSZ in Fig. 10a, b) along which
leucogranite laccoliths were emplaced during shearing
(Gapais et al., 1993; Turrillot et al., 2009, 2011). North-
east of the Vilaine estuary, the steeply dipping SE ex-
tension of the sinistral SSZ separates the Morbihan and
Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles units.

b. *Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles Unit.* Metasediments, consist-
ing mainly of mica schists with numerous interca-
lations of graphite-rich quartzite and acid metabol-
canics known as “porphyroids”, tectonically overlie
the Morbihan Unit (e.g. Audren and Jégouzo, 1986;
Audren, 1987; Le Hébel et al., 2002b; Augier et
al., 2010). The metamorphic grade increases down-
wards from chlorite + albite greenschist-facies to gar-
net ± staurolite + biotite amphibolite-facies conditions
(e.g. Triboulet and Audren, 1988; Goujou, 1992; Brown
and Dallmeyer, 1996). *P*–*T* estimates gave peak con-
ditions of 7–9 kbar and 350–400 °C (Le Hébel et al.,
2002b). The so-called “porphyroids” (i.e. metamov-
canics) were dated to the Ordovician (Ballèvre et al.,
2012).

This intermediate unit has been termed the “lower al-
lochthon” by Ballèvre et al. (2014). It is well repre-
sented on the island of Belle-Île and on the Rhuys and
Guérande peninsulas on either side of the Vilaine estu-
ary, as well as south of the Loire River, around the Bois-
de-Céné klippe, where it has been named the “Saint-
Gilles Unit” (e.g. Lahondère et al., 2009).

c. *Groix Unit.* The well-known HP Groix Unit, described above (see Sect. 5.2) and attributed to the oceanic "mid- dle allochthon" by Ballèvre et al. (2014), is located in the core of synformal folds, at Groix, at Bois-de-Céné and thus in the Vilaine estuary (Fig. 10). This last occur- rence has hitherto gone unnoticed because the metaba- sites of the western part of the Vilaine estuary, which we here assign to the Groix Unit (see Sect. 5.2, item a), have been confused with the calc-silicate rocks of the NE part of the estuary, which belong to the Morbi- han Unit (see above). Although difficult to distinguish due to strong retrogression, Morbihan-type calc-silicate rocks and Groix-type metabasites can be discriminated on the basis of their mineralogy, which includes relics of skarn-like high-*T* assemblages in the former and of HP metamorphic parageneses in the latter.

The contact of the various Groix-type klippen with
the underlying Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles Unit, mainly lo-
cated at sea, seems to have been observed in only one
place, in the Bois-de-Céné klippe (46.9346, -1.760).

The transition between the two units there is gradual,
with concordant schistosity and lineation, suggesting
that the tectonic juxtaposition of the two units was syn-
metamorphic (Rebay and Godard, in Lahondère et al.,
2009). Such a syn-metamorphic ductile fault has also
been demonstrated by Bosse et al. (2002) on the island
of Groix, within the Groix Unit itself.

There are other geological formations in the South Armor-
ican Domain, particularly at its outer edge near the South
Armorican Shear Zone (SASZ in Fig. 10a), where they are
strongly stretched and verticalised. They are not considered
here, but it is useful to mention an eclogite-facies forma-
tion, large occurrences of which are preserved in Galicia in
Spain (Cabo Ortegal), in Finistère in France (Bay of Au-
dierne) and south of the Loire (Les Essarts Unit). Although
this last formation testifies to HP eclogite-facies metamor-
phism, it is clearly distinct from the Groix Unit by its petrol-
ogy and tectonometamorphic evolution (e.g. Godard, 1988,
2009; Ballèvre et al., 2009, 2014); it has been attributed to
the upper allochthon by Ballèvre et al. (2014).

5.4 Multiple occurrences of Groix-type unit in the Ibero-Armoricán Arc

The progressive and tectonically concordant contact between the Groix and Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles units, combined with the very general retrogression in the greenschist facies of the Groix-type metabasites, explains why the Groix Unit has not yet been recognised within the synformal fold of the Vilaine estuary, of which Île Dumet is the centre. For the same reasons, other remnants of the same formation may have gone unnoticed. To identify them, it is necessary to combine structural criteria (e.g. klippe over the Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles Unit) with petrological data (presence of garnet + phengite ± paragonite ± chloritoid mica schists, with possible lenses of serpentinite and glaucophanite more or less retrogressed). In the following, we examine the various regions, from the west (Iberia) to the east (French Massif Central), where these criteria seem to apply:

a. Arenas et al. (2021) present solid evidence for the in-
tegration of the very distant Badajoz–Córdoba Unit
(SW Iberian Massif) into the blueschist-facies belt of
the Ibero-Armoricán Arc, on the basis of its petrology,
age and metamorphic conditions (Devonian blueschist-
facies metamorphism). Correlations with such distant
formations, probably still hypothetical, are undoubtedly
a stimulating research objective for the future.

b. In the Iberian part of the Ibero-Armoricán Arc, some occurrences of glaucophanite and glaucophane-chloritoid-bearing metapelites occur in the Trás-os-Montes region of northern Portugal (e.g. Gil Ibarguchi and Dallmeyer, 1991) and in the Ceán Unit of Galicia (e.g. Lopez-Carmona et al., 2014; Arenas et al., 2016).
trital origin but whose unusually high Ca content (Tri-
boulet and Audren, 1985c, p. 61) confirms a strong sed-
imentary carbonate supply.

The Morbihan migmatite unit is commonly roofed
by major gently dipping extensional shear zones (e.g.
"Sarzeau Shear Zone": SSZ in Fig. 10a, b) along which
leucogranite laccoliths were emplaced during shearing
(Gapais et al., 1993; Turrillot et al., 2009, 2011). North-
east of the Vilaine estuary, the steeply dipping SE ex-
tension of the sinistral SSZ separates the Morbihan and
Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles units.

b. *Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles Unit.* Metasediments, consist-
ing mainly of mica schists with numerous interca-
lations of graphite-rich quartzite and acidmetavol-
canics known as “porphyroids”, tectonically overlie
the Morbihan Unit (e.g. Audren and Jégouzo, 1986;
Audren, 1987; Le Hébel et al., 2002b; Augier et
al., 2010). The metamorphic grade increases down-
wards from chlorite + albite greenschist-facies to gar-
net ± staurolite + biotite amphibolite-facies conditions
(e.g. Triboulet and Audren, 1988; Goujou, 1992; Brown
and Dallmeyer, 1996). *P*–*T* estimates gave peak con-
ditions of 7–9 kbar and 350–400 °C (Le Hébel et al.,
2002b). The so-called “porphyroids” (i.e. metavol-
canics) were dated to the Ordovician (Ballèvre et al.,
2012).

This intermediate unit has been termed the “lower al-
lochthon” by Ballèvre et al. (2014). It is well repre-
sented on the island of Belle-Île and on the Rhuys and
Guérande peninsulas on either side of the Vilaine estu-
ary, as well as south of the Loire River, around the Bois-
de-Céné klippe, where it has been named the “Saint-
Gilles Unit” (e.g. Lahondère et al., 2009).

c. *Groix Unit.* The well-known HP Groix Unit, described above (see Sect. 5.2) and attributed to the oceanic "mid- dle allochthon" by Ballèvre et al. (2014), is located in the core of synformal folds, at Groix, at Bois-de-Céné and thus in the Vilaine estuary (Fig. 10). This last occur- rence has hitherto gone unnoticed because the metaba- sites of the western part of the Vilaine estuary, which we here assign to the Groix Unit (see Sect. 5.2, item a), have been confused with the calc-silicate rocks of the NE part of the estuary, which belong to the Morbi- han Unit (see above). Although difficult to distinguish due to strong retrogression, Morbihan-type calc-silicate rocks and Groix-type metabasites can be discriminated on the basis of their mineralogy, which includes relics of skarn-like high-*T* assemblages in the former and of HP metamorphic parageneses in the latter.

The contact of the various Groix-type klippen with
the underlying Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles Unit, mainly lo-
cated at sea, seems to have been observed in only one
place, in the Bois-de-Céné klippe (46.9346, -1.760).

The transition between the two units there is gradual,
with concordant schistosity and lineation, suggesting
that the tectonic juxtaposition of the two units was syn-
metamorphic (Rebay and Godard, in Lahondère et al.,
2009). Such a syn-metamorphic ductile fault has also
been demonstrated by Bosse et al. (2002) on the island
of Groix, within the Groix Unit itself.

There are other geological formations in the South Armor-
ican Domain, particularly at its outer edge near the South
Armorican Shear Zone (SASZ in Fig. 10a), where they are
strongly stretched and verticalised. They are not considered
here, but it is useful to mention an eclogite-facies forma-
tion, large occurrences of which are preserved in Galicia in
Spain (Cabo Ortegal), in Finistère in France (Bay of Au-
dierne) and south of the Loire (Les Essarts Unit). Although
this last formation testifies to HP eclogite-facies metamor-
phism, it is clearly distinct from the Groix Unit by its petrol-
ogy and tectonometamorphic evolution (e.g. Godard, 1988,
2009; Ballèvre et al., 2009, 2014); it has been attributed to
the upper allochthon by Ballèvre et al. (2014).

5.4 Multiple occurrences of Groix-type unit in the Ibero-Armoricán Arc

The progressive and tectonically concordant contact between
the Groix and Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles units, combined with
the very general retrogression in the greenschist facies of
the Groix-type metabasites, explains why the Groix Unit has
not yet been recognised within the synformal fold of the Vi-
laine estuary, of which Île Dumet is the centre. For the same
reasons, other remnants of the same formation may have
gone unnoticed. To identify them, it is necessary to com-
bine structural criteria (e.g. klippe over the Belle-Île/Saint-
Gilles Unit) with petrological data (presence of garnet +
phengite ± paragonite ± chloritoid mica schists, with possi-
ble lenses of serpentinite and glaucophanite more or less ret-
rogressed). In the following, we examine the various regions,
from the west (Iberia) to the east (French Massif Central),
where these criteria seem to apply:

a. Arenas et al. (2021) present solid evidence for the in-
tegration of the very distant Badajoz–Córdoba Unit
(SW Iberian Massif) into the blueschist-facies belt of
the Ibero-Armoricán Arc, on the basis of its petrology,
age and metamorphic conditions (Devonian blueschist-
facies metamorphism). Correlations with such distant
formations, probably still hypothetical, are undoubtedly
a stimulating research objective for the future.

b. In the Iberian part of the Ibero-Armoricán Arc, some occurrences of glaucophanite and glaucophane-chloritoid-bearing metapelites occur in the Trás-os-Montes region of northern Portugal (e.g. Gil Ibarguchi and Dallmeyer, 1991) and in the Ceán Unit of Galicia (e.g. Lopez-Carmona et al., 2014; Arenas et al., 2016).
c. West of Concarneau (northern Brittany; Fig. 10a), some rocks of the “Nerly group”, including mica schists, ultramafites (Kerlévot) and metabasites (Béchennec and Hallégouët, 1999), could be assigned to the Groix Unit if one accepts an extreme retrogression in greenschist-facies conditions. In the same region, coastal sands from the southern part of the Bay of Audierne gave Chauris (1992) a relatively large number of glaucophane grains, suggesting the presence of glaucophanite at sea.

d. Near Le Pouldu, between Concarneau and Lorient (Fig. 10a), metabasites with blue-green “subglaucophanic actinote” were studied by Triboulet (1980, 1992); they are associated in the field with garnet and chloritoid mica schists (Triboulet, 1983; Béchennec et al., 2012). Although the metamorphic conditions here do not strictly belong to the blueschist facies, Triboulet insisted on the similarity of the evolution of these rocks with those of Groix, both for the metabasites (Triboulet, 1980, p. 99) and for the metapelites (Triboulet, 1983, p. 203).

e. The blueschist-facies rocks of the island of Groix have been extensively studied since their discovery in 1883 (e.g. Audren et al., 1993; Ballèvre et al., 2003, and references therein; see historical review in Godard, 2019). Although largely masked by the ocean, they have also been observed at Baz Moullek, 11 km SE of Groix Island, where submarine cores have yielded chloritoid mica schists and glaucophane metabasites (Delanoë et al., 1972), and extend up to 35 km SE of Groix, between the island of Belle-Île and the Quiberon peninsula (Audren and Jégouzo, 1986).

f. The western Vilaine estuary and Dumet Island constitute another klippe, described here.

g. South of the Loire, the Bois-de-Céné Formation (Fig. 10a) forms the core of a synform bounded by “porphyroids” of the Belle-Île Unit (also known there as the Saint-Gilles Unit). It includes glaucophanites and serpentinites boudinaged within mica schists with garnet, phengite and chloritoid (Anthonyoz and Bril-lanceau, 1969; Guiraud et al., 1987; Triboulet, 1991; Lahondère et al., 2009). Mg-rich chlorite schists associated with serpentinite at Bois-de-Céné yielded a protolith age identical to that of similar rocks from Île de Groix (U–Pb zircon: 488.8 ± 2.7 vs. 492.7 ± 3.2 Ma; Paquette et al., 2017).

h. Another synform of mica schists surrounded by “porphyroids” occurs in the Falleron area, about 10 km SE of Bois-de-Céné (Fig. 10a). Outcrop conditions there are very poor, and no glaucophanite has been reported. However, abundant glaucophane was observed in the alluvial deposits of local streams and rivers by Guigues and Devismes (1969) and also in local Cretaceous sandy

sediments where it was observed together with garnet, epidote and chloritoid (Louail, 1984, pp. 234, 263). Guigues and Devismes (1969) reported another occurrence of alluvial glaucophane further to the SE, between La Ferrière and Les Essarts, where the Groix-type unit could be strongly stretched together with “porphyroids” of the Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles Unit.

i. Towards the SE, on the SW border of the French Massif Central, the Najac-Carmaux klippe with its glaucophane eclogites (Delor et al., 1986; Lotout et al., 2018), serpentinites and phengite + chloritoid + garnet mica schists (Delor et al., 1987; Quenardel et al., 1991) may belong to the same HP belt.

These multiple occurrences, some of which are hypothetical or poorly exposed, show that the Groix Unit exists in the Ibero-Armoricán Arc in locations other than on the island of Groix and in the Bois-de-Céné region. They form a discontinuous belt of blueschist-facies metamorphism, which actually extends well outside the Armorican Massif. The origin and geodynamic evolution of this HP belt, discussed by many authors with particular reference to the island of Groix, are beyond the scope of this study. The mélange of pelitic metasediments, metabasites, serpentinites and Mn-rich quartzites, the latter being quite typical of an oceanic environment (e.g. Tumiati et al., 2010), suggests subduction of an oceanic accretionary prism (see discussion in Ballèvre et al., 2009, 2013, 2014) during the Upper Devonian (370–360 Ma: Bosse et al., 2005). According to Ballèvre et al. (2014), this oceanic unit would be part of the middle allochthon of the Ibero-Armoricán Arc, but these authors also include in this tectonic domain some units (e.g. Drain, Saint-Martin-des-Noyers) that lack blueschist-facies metamorphism and whose metabasites largely dominate over metapelites so that, although oceanic, they probably have a different origin from that of the above-mentioned occurrences of the Groix Unit.

## 5.5 The embarrassing question of the Ordovician orthogneisses

The presence of orthogneisses within the Groix Unit, whether on Groix Island (Sables Rouges), in the Vilaine estuary (Dumet Island and Pénestin) or in the Bois-de-Céné region (see Sects. 4.3 and 5.2, item e), raises two difficult questions.

First, from a geodynamic point of view, it is difficult to explain the presence of metagranitoids in an environment interpreted as a subducting oceanic accretionary prism. On the island of Groix, El Korh et al. (2012) circumvented the problem by suggesting that the Sables Rouges orthogneiss was derived from acid volcanics rather than from a granitoid. This is more difficult to sustain for Dumet Island, given the numerous veins and apophyses of the orthogneiss stretched in mica schists and the enclaves of mica schists within
c. West of Concarneau (northern Brittany; Fig. 10a), some rocks of the “Nerly group”, including mica schists, ultramafites (Kerlévot) and metabasites (Béchennec and Hallégouët, 1999), could be assigned to the Groix Unit if one accepts an extreme retrogression in greenschist-facies conditions. In the same region, coastal sands from the southern part of the Bay of Audierne gave Chauris (1992) a relatively large number of glaucophane grains, suggesting the presence of glaucophanite at sea.

d. Near Le Pouldu, between Concarneau and Lorient (Fig. 10a), metabasites with blue-green “subglaucophanic actinote” were studied by Triboulet (1980, 1992); they are associated in the field with garnet and chloritoid mica schists (Triboulet, 1983; Béchennec et al., 2012). Although the metamorphic conditions here do not strictly belong to the blueschist facies, Triboulet insisted on the similarity of the evolution of these rocks with those of Groix, both for the metabasites (Triboulet, 1980, p. 99) and for the metapelites (Triboulet, 1983, p. 203).

e. The blueschist-facies rocks of the island of Groix have been extensively studied since their discovery in 1883 (e.g. Audren et al., 1993; Ballèvre et al., 2003, and references therein; see historical review in Godard, 2019). Although largely masked by the ocean, they have also been observed at Baz Moullek, 11 km SE of Groix Island, where submarine cores have yielded chloritoid mica schists and glaucophane metabasites (Delanoë et al., 1972), and extend up to 35 km SE of Groix, between the island of Belle-Île and the Quiberon peninsula (Audren and Jégouzo, 1986).

f. The western Vilaine estuary and Dumet Island constitute another klippe, described here.

g. South of the Loire, the Bois-de-Céné Formation (Fig. 10a) forms the core of a synform bounded by “porphyroids” of the Belle-Île Unit (also known there as the Saint-Gilles Unit). It includes glaucophanites and serpentinites boudinaged within mica schists with garnet, phengite and chloritoid (Anthonyoz and Bril-lanceau, 1969; Guiraud et al., 1987; Triboulet, 1991; Lahondère et al., 2009). Mg-rich chlorite schists associated with serpentinite at Bois-de-Céné yielded a protolith age identical to that of similar rocks from Île de Groix (U–Pb zircon: 488.8 ± 2.7 vs. 492.7 ± 3.2 Ma; Paquette et al., 2017).

h. Another synform of mica schists surrounded by “porphyroids” occurs in the Falleron area, about 10 km SE of Bois-de-Céné (Fig. 10a). Outcrop conditions there are very poor, and no glaucophanite has been reported. However, abundant glaucophane was observed in the alluvial deposits of local streams and rivers by Guigues and Devismes (1969) and also in local Cretaceous sandy

sediments where it was observed together with garnet, epidote and chloritoid (Louail, 1984, pp. 234, 263). Guigues and Devismes (1969) reported another occurrence of alluvial glaucophane further to the SE, between La Ferrière and Les Essarts, where the Groix-type unit could be strongly stretched together with “porphyroids” of the Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles Unit.

i. Towards the SE, on the SW border of the French Massif Central, the Najac-Carmaux klippe with its glaucophane eclogites (Delor et al., 1986; Lotout et al., 2018), serpentinites and phengite + chloritoid + garnet mica schists (Delor et al., 1987; Quenardel et al., 1991) may belong to the same HP belt.

These multiple occurrences, some of which are hypothetical or poorly exposed, show that the Groix Unit exists in the Ibero-Armoricán Arc in locations other than on the island of Groix and in the Bois-de-Céné region. They form a discontinuous belt of blueschist-facies metamorphism, which actually extends well outside the Armorican Massif. The origin and geodynamic evolution of this HP belt, discussed by many authors with particular reference to the island of Groix, are beyond the scope of this study. The mélange of pelitic metasediments, metabasites, serpentinites and Mn-rich quartzites, the latter being quite typical of an oceanic environment (e.g. Tumiati et al., 2010), suggests subduction of an oceanic accretionary prism (see discussion in Ballèvre et al., 2009, 2013, 2014) during the Upper Devonian (370–360 Ma: Bosse et al., 2005). According to Ballèvre et al. (2014), this oceanic unit would be part of the middle allochthon of the Ibero-Armoricán Arc, but these authors also include in this tectonic domain some units (e.g. Drain, Saint-Martin-des-Noyers) that lack blueschist-facies metamorphism and whose metabasites largely dominate over metapelites so that, although oceanic, they probably have a different origin from that of the above-mentioned occurrences of the Groix Unit.

## 5.5 The embarrassing question of the Ordovician orthogneisses

The presence of orthogneisses within the Groix Unit, whether on Groix Island (Sables Rouges), in the Vilaine estuary (Dumet Island and Pénestin) or in the Bois-de-Céné region (see Sects. 4.3 and 5.2, item e), raises two difficult questions.

First, from a geodynamic point of view, it is difficult to explain the presence of metagranitoids in an environment interpreted as a subducting oceanic accretionary prism. On the island of Groix, El Korh et al. (2012) circumvented the problem by suggesting that the Sables Rouges orthogneiss was derived from acid volcanics rather than from a granitoid. This is more difficult to sustain for Dumet Island, given the numerous veins and apophyses of the orthogneiss stretched in mica schists and the enclaves of mica schists within
the orthogneiss (Figs. 1 and 3b), suggesting intrusion of a magmatic protolith. Furthermore, the presence of perthitic and antiperthitic exsolution lamellae in the feldspars of the Dumet Island orthogneiss (see Sect. 4.5) strongly favours a metagranitic origin.

The main problem is the degree of metamorphism of the orthogneisses, which do not seem to have undergone the HP conditions observed in the neighbouring glaucophane eclogites and still detected in the surrounding phengite + paragonite + garnet mica schists despite their retrogression. Admittedly, the white mica of the Dumet orthogneiss is phengite, with a significant celadonite substitution (see Sect. 4.3), and its biotite in contact with plagioclase has been partly replaced by aggregates composed of microgarnets, phengite and K-feldspar (Fig. 4h), reminiscent of the coronitic reactions that occur in metagranites and metapelites metamorphosed under eclogite-facies conditions, such as at Monte Mucrone in the Alps or in the surrounding gneisses of some Armorican eclogites (e.g. Godard, 2009; Gyomlai et al., 2023). However, doubts about the intensity of the HP metamorphism experienced by the Dumet orthogneiss are raised by the abundance of preserved K-feldspar and plagioclase apparently inherited from the magmatic protolith, as indicated at Dumet by perthitic and antiperthitic exsolution lamellae (sample ID17; Fig. 4g). K-feldspar generally survives HP metamorphism, but albite-rich plagioclase is predicted to transform into jadeite-bearing pseudomorphs (e.g. Gilotti et al., 2023). At Groix Island, plagioclase porphyroclasts also appear to be of magmatic origin, as they show albite and Carlsbad twins (Fig. 4 in El Korh et al., 2012), the latter being normally absent from metamorphic feldspars.

The absence of well-defined traces of HP metamorphism in the orthogneiss could be explained by an intrusion of the granitic protolith during the retrograde evolution of the surrounding HP rocks, before the last penetrative deformation (phase S2 of Audren, 1987). However, this hypothesis is contradicted at Groix by the Early Ordovician age attributed to the protolith of the orthogneiss (481.1 ± 3.7 Ma: El Korh et al., 2012), which pre-dates the age of the HP metamorphism (360–370 Ma: Bosse et al., 2005). Although no comparable geochronological data are available for Dumet Island, the imprecise but “old” Rb–Sr age of the orthogneiss (419 ± 12 Ma: Peucat, 1983) suggests an identical conclusion.

It is difficult to explain the survival of magmatic feldspars under blueschist- or eclogite-facies conditions, especially albitic plagioclase, which should disappear beyond the unique $P-T$ curve albite = jadeite + quartz (dashed line in Fig. 9e), which may have been exceeded by the nearby glaucophane eclogites at Dumet and more certainly at Groix, where the rocks have reached the lawsonite stability domain. However, there is some debate about the metastability of feldspars in the eclogite facies under anhydrous conditions. In particular, Austrheim (1987) argued for the metastable preservation of “dry” undeformed granulite-facies parageneses in the anorthosites of the Bergen Arcs (Norway), which

in contrast are transformed into eclogites within shear zones under eclogite-facies conditions. Smith (1995, p. 320–321) referred to this hypothesis as the “ultrametastability model” since Al$^{IV}$ in plagioclase should have been transformed to Al$^{VI}$ at high P (see also the trend in Fig. 8d). He suggested that there may have been some “overpressure” in the shear zones that provided enough “extra” pressure to create the eclogites (Smith, 1988, 1995); it can also be admitted that the influx of fluid (Austrheim, 1987) and the deformation in the shear zones favoured the diffusion and hence the phase transitions. This debate has continued in more recent papers, such as that of Gyomlai et al. (2023) on the eclogite-facies metagranite of La Picherais in the Armorican Massif. Therefore, the metastability model could indeed solve the orthogneiss problem on the islands of Groix and Dumet.

## 6 Conclusions

Dumet Island contains numerous metre-sized lenses of metabasite revealing relict garnet glaucophanite and glaucophane eclogite, boudinaged within garnet- and phengite-bearing mica schists. Highly retrogressed metabasites and similar mica schists also occur on the mainland, on the banks of the Vilaine estuary. The whole of the Dumet Island geological formation is analogous to the well-known blueschist-facies formation of the island of Groix.

The best-preserved metabasites contain garnet, omphacite (Jd35–45), quartz, clinoamphibole, epidote, and minor paragonite and rutile. Peak metamorphic conditions, modelled by the $P-T$ pseudosection method, reached 16 kbar and 620 °C. The clinoamphibole crystals display a zoning from glaucophane at the $P$ peak through katophorite/winchite to magnesio-hornblende/pargasite and finally to actinolite, accompanied by decreasing $X_{Mg}$. The evolution along this trend corresponds to a decrease in the Al$^{VI}$/ (Al$^{VI}$+ Al$^{IV}$) ratio in clinoamphibole due to increasing $T$ and/or decreasing $P$ along a clockwise $P-T$ path, ending with widespread growth of late albite and calcic amphibole. The peak $P$ of the metamorphism coincides with the main phase of ductile deformation, which resulted in katophorite/winchite overgrowths along the foliation direction from pre-existing glaucophane nuclei.

The host mica schists, composed of quartz, phengite with lamellae of paragonite, zoned garnet, chlorite, clinozoisite and titanite with remnants of rutile, have been largely affected by the retrograde metamorphism responsible for the formation of albite. On the mainland, they also contain chloritoid in some localities. They are analogous to the mica schists of the island of Groix.

An orthogneiss crops out on the southern part of the Dumet Island, as well as in the region of Pénestin on the mainland. Despite subsequent deformation, this metagranitoid still shows intrusive relationships with the mica schists. However, it has not developed clear traces of HP metamorphism,
the orthogneiss (Figs. 1 and 3b), suggesting intrusion of a magmatic protolith. Furthermore, the presence of perthitic and antiperthitic exsolution lamellae in the feldspars of the Dumet Island orthogneiss (see Sect. 4.5) strongly favours a metagranitic origin.

The main problem is the degree of metamorphism of the orthogneisses, which do not seem to have undergone the HP conditions observed in the neighbouring glaucophane eclogites and still detected in the surrounding phengite + paragonite + garnet mica schists despite their retrogression. Admittedly, the white mica of the Dumet orthogneiss is phengite, with a significant celadonite substitution (see Sect. 4.3), and its biotite in contact with plagioclase has been partly replaced by aggregates composed of microgarnets, phengite and K-feldspar (Fig. 4h), reminiscent of the coronitic reactions that occur in metagranites and metapelites metamorphosed under eclogite-facies conditions, such as at Monte Mucrone in the Alps or in the surrounding gneisses of some Armorican eclogites (e.g. Godard, 2009; Gyomlai et al., 2023). However, doubts about the intensity of the HP metamorphism experienced by the Dumet orthogneiss are raised by the abundance of preserved K-feldspar and plagioclase apparently inherited from the magmatic protolith, as indicated at Dumet by perthitic and antiperthitic exsolution lamellae (sample ID17; Fig. 4g). K-feldspar generally survives HP metamorphism, but albite-rich plagioclase is predicted to transform into jadeite-bearing pseudomorphs (e.g. Gilotti et al., 2023). At Groix Island, plagioclase porphyroclasts also appear to be of magmatic origin, as they show albite and Carlsbad twins (Fig. 4 in El Korh et al., 2012), the latter being normally absent from metamorphic feldspars.

The absence of well-defined traces of HP metamorphism in the orthogneiss could be explained by an intrusion of the granitic protolith during the retrograde evolution of the surrounding HP rocks, before the last penetrative deformation (phase S2 of Audren, 1987). However, this hypothesis is contradicted at Groix by the Early Ordovician age attributed to the protolith of the orthogneiss (481.1 ± 3.7 Ma: El Korh et al., 2012), which pre-dates the age of the HP metamorphism (360–370 Ma: Bosse et al., 2005). Although no comparable geochronological data are available for Dumet Island, the imprecise but “old” Rb–Sr age of the orthogneiss (419 ± 12 Ma: Peucat, 1983) suggests an identical conclusion.

It is difficult to explain the survival of magmatic feldspars under blueschist- or eclogite-facies conditions, especially albitic plagioclase, which should disappear beyond the unique $P-T$ curve albite = jadeite + quartz (dashed line in Fig. 9e), which may have been exceeded by the nearby glaucophane eclogites at Dumet and more certainly at Groix, where the rocks have reached the lawsonite stability domain. However, there is some debate about the metastability of feldspars in the eclogite facies under anhydrous conditions. In particular, Austrheim (1987) argued for the metastable preservation of “dry” undeformed granulite-facies parageneses in the anorthosites of the Bergen Arcs (Norway), which

in contrast are transformed into eclogites within shear zones under eclogite-facies conditions. Smith (1995, p. 320–321) referred to this hypothesis as the “ultrametastability model” since Al$^{IV}$ in plagioclase should have been transformed to Al$^{VI}$ at high P (see also the trend in Fig. 8d). He suggested that there may have been some “overpressure” in the shear zones that provided enough “extra” pressure to create the eclogites (Smith, 1988, 1995); it can also be admitted that the influx of fluid (Austrheim, 1987) and the deformation in the shear zones favoured the diffusion and hence the phase transitions. This debate has continued in more recent papers, such as that of Gyomlai et al. (2023) on the eclogite-facies metagranite of La Picherais in the Armorican Massif. Therefore, the metastability model could indeed solve the orthogneiss problem on the islands of Groix and Dumet.

## 6 Conclusions

Dumet Island contains numerous metre-sized lenses of metabasite revealing relict garnet glaucophanite and glaucophane eclogite, boudinaged within garnet- and phengite-bearing mica schists. Highly retrogressed metabasites and similar mica schists also occur on the mainland, on the banks of the Vilaine estuary. The whole of the Dumet Island geological formation is analogous to the well-known blueschist-facies formation of the island of Groix.

The best-preserved metabasites contain garnet, omphacite (Jd35–45), quartz, clinoamphibole, epidote, and minor paragonite and rutile. Peak metamorphic conditions, modelled by the $P-T$ pseudosection method, reached 16 kbar and 620 °C. The clinoamphibole crystals display a zoning from glaucophane at the $P$ peak through katophorite/winchite to magnesio-hornblende/pargasite and finally to actinolite, accompanied by decreasing $X_{Mg}$. The evolution along this trend corresponds to a decrease in the Al$^{VI}$/ (Al$^{VI}$+ Al$^{IV}$) ratio in clinoamphibole due to increasing $T$ and/or decreasing $P$ along a clockwise $P-T$ path, ending with widespread growth of late albite and calcic amphibole. The peak $P$ of the metamorphism coincides with the main phase of ductile deformation, which resulted in katophorite/winchite overgrowths along the foliation direction from pre-existing glaucophane nuclei.

The host mica schists, composed of quartz, phengite with lamellae of paragonite, zoned garnet, chlorite, clinozoisite and titanite with remnants of rutile, have been largely affected by the retrograde metamorphism responsible for the formation of albite. On the mainland, they also contain chloritoid in some localities. They are analogous to the mica schists of the island of Groix.

An orthogneiss crops out on the southern part of the Dumet Island, as well as in the region of Pénestin on the mainland. Despite subsequent deformation, this metagranitoid still shows intrusive relationships with the mica schists. However, it has not developed clear traces of HP metamorphism,
apart from a few irregular garnet reaction coronas. In partic-
ular, magmatic feldspars seem to have been metastably pre-
served at higher *P* than some feldspar-out reactions. This or-
thogneiss appears to be an equivalent to that described at Les
Sables Rouges on the island of Groix. The origin, age and
metamorphic history of these orthogneisses, both at Groix
and at Dumet, are the main problems to be solved for future
research.

Île Dumet, together with the western part of the Vilaine es-
tuary, is definitely considered in this article the “little sister”
of the well-known Île de Groix. The blueschist-facies rocks
of both islands belong to the Groix Unit, which is located at
the top of the tectonic pile of the South Armorican Domain.
About 10 similar occurrences of this HP unit have been pre-
served in the core of various synforms throughout the Ibero-
Armorican Arc, but most of them have remained unnoticed
until now due to the general retrogression of the rocks within
the greenschist facies and their tectonic concordance with the
underlying Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles Unit. This growing family
of occurrences forms a discontinuous belt created by the sub-
duction of an oceanic accretionary prism, at the beginning of
the Variscan orogeny.

*Code availability.* The freeware (PCalc2.4) used to bal-
ance reactions and perform modal calculations and projec-
tions can be downloaded from the ResearchGate platform
(https://www.researchgate.net/ (last access: 12 January 2024);
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17290.03527, Godard, 2024).

*Data availability.* All the structural data are visualised in Fig. 1.
Most of the analytical data are presented in Tables 1 and 2 and in
the Supplement. The thermodynamic data are those of Holland and
Powell (2011).

*Supplement.* The supplement related to this article is available on-line at: https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-36-99-2024-supplement.

*Author contributions.* Field survey and sampling: GG, DS, DJ; SEM observation and EMP analyses: GG, DS, DJ; bulk rock analyses: DJ; mineralogical and petrological studies: GG, DS; pseudosection modelling: SD, GG; redaction and editing of text, figures and tables: GG, DS; improvement and corrections: GG, DS, DJ, SD.

*Competing interests.* The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

*Disclaimer.* Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical rep-

resentation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes ev-
ery effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility
lies with the authors.

*Special issue statement.* This article is part of the special issue “(Ultra)high-pressure metamorphism, from crystal to orogenic scale”. It is a result of the 14th International Eclogite Conference (IEC-14) held in Paris and Lyon, France, 10–13 July 2022.

*Acknowledgements.* We thank the Conservatoire de l'espace lit-
toral et des rivages lacustres, in particular Odile Gauthier and Jean-
Michel Laloue, for allowing us access to Île Dumet (convention no.
44-275). Our sincere thanks go to Michel Garnier, Daniel Eloi and
Christian Piot, who volunteered to take us by boat from Piriac, thus
facilitating our access to the island. Bernard Lasnier kindly pro-
vided us with thin sections of his rock samples from Dumet Is-
land. We are grateful to Ricardo Arenas and Michel Ballèvre for
their helpful reviews of the manuscript and to Samuel Angiboust
and Christian Chopin for their editorial assistance. We dedicate this
article to the memory of Claude Audren, who carried out the first
detailed geological study of Île Dumet.

*Review statement.* This paper was edited by Samuel Angiboust and reviewed by Michel Ballèvre and Ricardo Arenas.

References

Affholder, J.-G.: Une nouvelle détermination du pôle des terres émergées, Le Monde des cartes: revue du Comité français de cartographie, 173–174, 43–58, 2002.

Anthonioz, P. M. and Brillanceau, A.: Introduction à la géologie de la région de Bois-de-Céné (Vendée); un nouveau jalon du métamorphisme de haute pression dans le massif Armoricain, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris (Série D), 269, 1050–1052, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k63251842/f226.item (last access: 12 January 2024), 1969.

Arenas, R., Sánchez Martínez, S., Díez Fernández, R., Gerdes, A., Abati, J., Fernández-Suárez, J., Andonaegui, P., González Cuadra, P., López Carmona, A., Albert, R., Manuel Fuenlabrada, J., and Rubio Pascual, F. J.: Allochthonous terranes involved in the Variscan suture of NW Iberia: A review of their origin and tectonothermal evolution, Earth-Sci. Rev., 161, 140–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.010, 2016.

Arenas, R., Novo-Fernández, I., Garcia-Casco, A., Díez Fer-
nández, R., Fuenlabrada, J. M., Pereira, M. F., Abati,
J., Sánchez Martínez, S., and Rubio Pascual, F. J.: A
unique blueschist facies metapelite with Mg-rich chlori-
toid from the Badajoz-Córdoba Unit (SW Iberian Mas-
sif): correlation of Late Devonian high-pressure belts along
the Variscan Orogen, Int. Geol. Rev., 63, 1634–1657,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2020.1789509, 2021.

Audren, C.: Les schistes cristallins de la Vilaine (Bretagne méridionale), Bull. Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, 6, 1–41, 1974.
apart from a few irregular garnet reaction coronas. In partic-
ular, magmatic feldspars seem to have been metastably pre-
served at higher *P* than some feldspar-out reactions. This or-
thogneiss appears to be an equivalent to that described at Les
Sables Rouges on the island of Groix. The origin, age and
metamorphic history of these orthogneisses, both at Groix
and at Dumet, are the main problems to be solved for future
research.

Île Dumet, together with the western part of the Vilaine es-
tuary, is definitely considered in this article the “little sister”
of the well-known Île de Groix. The blueschist-facies rocks
of both islands belong to the Groix Unit, which is located at
the top of the tectonic pile of the South Armorican Domain.
About 10 similar occurrences of this HP unit have been pre-
served in the core of various synforms throughout the Ibero-
Armorican Arc, but most of them have remained unnoticed
until now due to the general retrogression of the rocks within
the greenschist facies and their tectonic concordance with the
underlying Belle-Île/Saint-Gilles Unit. This growing family
of occurrences forms a discontinuous belt created by the sub-
duction of an oceanic accretionary prism, at the beginning of
the Variscan orogeny.

*Code availability.* The freeware (PCalc2.4) used to bal-
ance reactions and perform modal calculations and projec-
tions can be downloaded from the ResearchGate platform
(https://www.researchgate.net/ (last access: 12 January 2024);
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17290.03527, Godard, 2024).

*Data availability.* All the structural data are visualised in Fig. 1.
Most of the analytical data are presented in Tables 1 and 2 and in
the Supplement. The thermodynamic data are those of Holland and
Powell (2011).

*Supplement.* The supplement related to this article is available on-line at: https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-36-99-2024-supplement.

*Author contributions.* Field survey and sampling: GG, DS, DJ; SEM observation and EMP analyses: GG, DS, DJ; bulk rock analyses: DJ; mineralogical and petrological studies: GG, DS; pseudosection modelling: SD, GG; redaction and editing of text, figures and tables: GG, DS; improvement and corrections: GG, DS, DJ, SD.

*Competing interests.* The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

*Disclaimer.* Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical rep-

resentation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes ev-
ery effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility
lies with the authors.

*Special issue statement.* This article is part of the special issue “(Ultra)high-pressure metamorphism, from crystal to orogenic scale”. It is a result of the 14th International Eclogite Conference (IEC-14) held in Paris and Lyon, France, 10–13 July 2022.

*Acknowledgements.* We thank the Conservatoire de l'espace lit-
toral et des rivages lacustres, in particular Odile Gauthier and Jean-
Michel Laloue, for allowing us access to Île Dumet (convention no.
44-275). Our sincere thanks go to Michel Garnier, Daniel Eloi and
Christian Piot, who volunteered to take us by boat from Piriac, thus
facilitating our access to the island. Bernard Lasnier kindly pro-
vided us with thin sections of his rock samples from Dumet Is-
land. We are grateful to Ricardo Arenas and Michel Ballèvre for
their helpful reviews of the manuscript and to Samuel Angiboust
and Christian Chopin for their editorial assistance. We dedicate this
article to the memory of Claude Audren, who carried out the first
detailed geological study of Île Dumet.

*Review statement.* This paper was edited by Samuel Angiboust and reviewed by Michel Ballèvre and Ricardo Arenas.

References

Affholder, J.-G.: Une nouvelle détermination du pôle des terres émergées, Le Monde des cartes: revue du Comité français de cartographie, 173–174, 43–58, 2002.

Anthonioz, P. M. and Brillanceau, A.: Introduction à la géologie de la région de Bois-de-Céné (Vendée); un nouveau jalon du métamorphisme de haute pression dans le massif Armoricain, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris (Série D), 269, 1050–1052, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k63251842/f226.item (last access: 12 January 2024), 1969.

Arenas, R., Sánchez Martínez, S., Díez Fernández, R., Gerdes, A., Abati, J., Fernández-Suárez, J., Andonaegui, P., González Cuadra, P., López Carmona, A., Albert, R., Manuel Fuenlabrada, J., and Rubio Pascual, F. J.: Allochthonous terranes involved in the Variscan suture of NW Iberia: A review of their origin and tectonothermal evolution, Earth-Sci. Rev., 161, 140–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.010, 2016.

Arenas, R., Novo-Fernández, I., Garcia-Casco, A., Díez Fer-
nández, R., Fuenlabrada, J. M., Pereira, M. F., Abati,
J., Sánchez Martínez, S., and Rubio Pascual, F. J.: A
unique blueschist facies metapelite with Mg-rich chlori-
toid from the Badajoz-Córdoba Unit (SW Iberian Mas-
sif): correlation of Late Devonian high-pressure belts along
the Variscan Orogen, Int. Geol. Rev., 63, 1634–1657,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2020.1789509, 2021.

Audren, C.: Les schistes cristallins de la Vilaine (Bretagne méridionale), Bull. Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, 6, 1–41, 1974.
Audren, C.: Evolution structurale de la Bretagne méridionale au Paléozoïque, Mémoires Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, 31, 365 pp. + dépl., 1987.

Audren, C.: Evolution tectonique et métamorphique de la chaîne varisque en Bretagne méridionale, Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr., 70, 17–34, 1990.

Audren, C. and Jégouzo, P.: Carte géologique de la France à 1/50 000, feuille Belle-Île-en-mer, îles Houat et Hoëdic (no 477), BRGM, Orléans, 1986.

Audren, C. and Le Métour, J.: Mobilisation anatectique et déformation. Un exemple: Les migmatites du Golfe du Morbihan (Bretagne méridionale), Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 9, 1041–1049, 1976.

Audren, C. and Triboulet, C.: P-T-t-deformation paths recorded by kinzigites during diapirism in the western Variscan belt (Golfe du Morbihan, southern Brittany, France), J. Metamorph. Geol., 11, 337–356, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.1993.tb00152.x, 1993.

Audren, C., Jégouzo, P., Barbaroux, L., and Bouysse, P.: Carte géologique de la France à 1/50 000, feuille La Roche-Bernard (no. 449), BRGM, Orléans, 1975.

Audren, C., Triboulet, C., Chauris, L., Lefort, J.-P., Vigneresse, J.-L., Audrain, J., Thiéblemont, D., Goyallon, J., Jégouzo, P., Guenoc, P., Augris, C., and Carn, A.: Carte géologique de la France, feuille Île de Groix à 1/25000, BRGM, Orléans, ISBN 2-7159-1415-6, 1993.

Augier, R., Turrillot, P., Van Vliet-Lanoë, B., Hallegouët, B., Menier, D., and Thinon, I.: Carte géologique de la France à 1/50 000, feuille Vannes Saint-Gildas-de-Rhuys (no. 417), BRGM, Orléans, ISBN 978-2-7159-1417-9, 2010.

Austrheim, H.: Eclogitization of lower crustal granulites by fluid migration in shear zones, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 81, 221–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(87)90158-0, 1987.

Ballèvre, M., Pitra, P., and Bohn, M.: Lawsonite growth in the epidote blueschists from the Ile de Groix (Armorican massif, France): a potential geobarometer, J. Metamorph. Geol., 21, 723–735, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1314.2003.00474.x, 2003.

Ballèvre, M., Bosse, V., Ducassou, C., and Pitra, P.: Palaeozoic history of the Armorican Massif: Models for the tectonic evolution of the suture zones, C. R. Géosci., 341, 174–201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2008.11.009, 2009.

Ballèvre, M., Fourcade, S., Capdevila, R., Peucat, J.-J., Cocherie, A., and Mark Fanning, C.: Geochronology and geochemistry of Ordovician felsic volcanism in the Southern Armorican Massif (Variscan belt, France): Implications for the breakup of Gondwana, Gondwana Res., 21, 1019–1036, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.07.030, 2012.

Ballèvre, M., Bosse, V., Dabard, M.-P., Ducassou, C., Fourcade, S., Paquette, J.-L., Peucat, J.-J., and Pitra, P.: Histoire Géologique du massif Armoricain: Actualité de la recherche, Bull. Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, 10–11, 5–96, 2013.

Ballèvre, M., Martínez Catalán, J. R., López-Carmona, A., Pitra, P., Abati, J., Díez Fernández, R., Ducassou, C., Arenas, R., Bosse, V., Castiñeiras, P., Fernández-Suárez, J., Barreiro, J. G., Paquette, J.-L., Peucat, J.-J., Poujol, M., Ruffet, G., and Sánchez Martínez, S.: Correlation of the nappe stack in the Ibero-Armican arc across the Bay of Biscay: a joint French-Spanish project, in: The Variscan Orogeny: Extent, timescale and the formation of the European crust, edited by: Schulmann, K., Martínez Catalán, J. R., Lardeaux, J. M., Janoušek, V., and Og-

giano, G., Geological Society Special Publications, 405, 77–113, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP405.13, 2014.

Baret, C.: Minéralogie de la Loire-Inférieure, Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Ouest France, VIII, 1–175 + 119 pl., https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1125075 (last access: 12 January 2024), 1898.

Barrois, C.: Note sur le chloritoïde du Morbihan, Bull. Soc. Minéral. France, VII, 37–43, https://doi.org/10.3406/bulmi.1884.1849, 1884.

Barrois, C.: Les pyroxénites des îles du Morbihan, Annales Soc. Géol. du Nord, XV, 69–96, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k57244478 (last access: 12 January 2024), 1887.

Barrois, C.: Carte géologique de la France au 1/80 000, Feuille Quiberon (no. 103), Service géologique national, Paris, 1897.

Baudouin, J., Bodeur, Y., and Lasnier, B.: Géologie de l'Île Dumet (Loire-Atlantique, France), Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Ouest France, 10, 109–134, 1988.

Béchennec, F. and Hallégouët, B.: Carte géologique de la France (1/50 000), feuille Quimper (346) + Notice explicative par Béchennec, F., Hallégouët, B., Thiéblemont, D., avec la collaboration de Guerrot, C., Cocherie, A., et Carn, A., BRGM, Orléans, 161 pp., ISBN 2-7159-1346-X, 1999.

Béchennec, F., Hallégouët, B., and Thinon, I.: Carte géologique de la France (1/50 000), feuille Lorient (383) + Notice explicative par Béchennec, F., Hallégouët, B., Thiéblemont, D., Thinon, I., avec la collaboration de Cocherie, A., Guerrot, C., et Lucassou, F., BRGM, Orléans, 206 pp., ISBN 978 2 7159 1383 7, 2012.

Berget, A.: Répartition géographique des Océans (détermination du pôle continental), Annales Institut océanographique, 5, 1–12, 1913.

Bosse, V., Ballèvre, M., and Vidal, O.: Ductile thrusting recorded by the garnet isograd from blueschist-facies metapelites of the Île de Groix, Armorican massif, France, J. Petrol., 43, 485–510, https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/43.3.485, 2002.

Bosse, V., Féraud, G., Ballèvre, M., Peucat, J.-J., and Corsini, M.: Rb-Sr and ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar ages in blueschists from the Île-de-Groix (Armorican Massif, France): Implications for closure mechanisms in isotopic systems, Chem. Geol., 220, 21–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.02.019, 2005.

Bouysse, P.: Recherches du B.R.G.M. sur le plateau continental; A, Résultats généraux obtenus par les premières campagnes du "Beluga" en Baie de la Vilaine et ses abords, Bull. B.R.G.M., Section 2: Géologie Appliquée, Chronique des Mines, 5, 3–17, 1966a.

Bouysse, P.: La baie de la Vilaine; étude sédimentologique et morphologique, Cahiers Océanographiques, 18, 319–341, 1966b.

Brown, M.: The petrogenesis of some migmatites from the Presqu'île de Rhuys, southern Brittany, France, in: Migmatites, Melting and Metamorphism, edited by: Atherton, M.-P., and Gribble, C.-D., Shiva Publishing, Nantwich, 174–200, ISBN 13 978 0906812266, 1983.

Brown, M. and Dallmeyer, R. D.: Rapid Variscan exhumation and the role of magma in core complex formation: southern Brittany metamorphic belt, France, J. Metamorp. Geol., 14, 361–379, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.1996.00361.x, 1996.

Burg, J. P., Van Den Driessche, J., and Brun, J.-P.: Syn-to post-thickening extension: mode and consequences, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris (Série 2), 319, 1019–1032, 1994.
Audren, C.: Evolution structurale de la Bretagne méridionale au Paléozoïque, Mémoires Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, 31, 365 pp. + dépl., 1987.

Audren, C.: Evolution tectonique et métamorphique de la chaîne varisque en Bretagne méridionale, Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr., 70, 17–34, 1990.

Audren, C. and Jégouzo, P.: Carte géologique de la France à 1/50 000, feuille Belle-Île-en-mer, îles Houat et Hoëdic (no 477), BRGM, Orléans, 1986.

Audren, C. and Le Métour, J.: Mobilisation anatectique et déformation. Un exemple: Les migmatites du Golfe du Morbihan (Bretagne méridionale), Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 9, 1041–1049, 1976.

Audren, C. and Triboulet, C.: P-T-t-deformation paths recorded by kinzigites during diapirism in the western Variscan belt (Golfe du Morbihan, southern Brittany, France), J. Metamorph. Geol., 11, 337–356, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.1993.tb00152.x, 1993.

Audren, C., Jégouzo, P., Barbaroux, L., and Bouysse, P.: Carte géologique de la France à 1/50 000, feuille La Roche-Bernard (no. 449), BRGM, Orléans, 1975.

Audren, C., Triboulet, C., Chauris, L., Lefort, J.-P., Vigneresse, J.-L., Audrain, J., Thiéblemont, D., Goyallon, J., Jégouzo, P., Guenoc, P., Augris, C., and Carn, A.: Carte géologique de la France, feuille Île de Groix à 1/25000, BRGM, Orléans, ISBN 2-7159-1415-6, 1993.

Augier, R., Turrillot, P., Van Vliet-Lanoë, B., Hallegouët, B., Menier, D., and Thinon, I.: Carte géologique de la France à 1/50 000, feuille Vannes Saint-Gildas-de-Rhuys (no. 417), BRGM, Orléans, ISBN 978-2-7159-1417-9, 2010.

Austrheim, H.: Eclogitization of lower crustal granulites by fluid migration in shear zones, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 81, 221–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(87)90158-0, 1987.

Ballèvre, M., Pitra, P., and Bohn, M.: Lawsonite growth in the epidote blueschists from the Ile de Groix (Armorican massif, France): a potential geobarometer, J. Metamorph. Geol., 21, 723–735, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1314.2003.00474.x, 2003.

Ballèvre, M., Bosse, V., Ducassou, C., and Pitra, P.: Palaeozoic history of the Armorican Massif: Models for the tectonic evolution of the suture zones, C. R. Géosci., 341, 174–201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2008.11.009, 2009.

Ballèvre, M., Fourcade, S., Capdevila, R., Peucat, J.-J., Cocherie, A., and Mark Fanning, C.: Geochronology and geochemistry of Ordovician felsic volcanism in the Southern Armorican Massif (Variscan belt, France): Implications for the breakup of Gondwana, Gondwana Res., 21, 1019–1036, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.07.030, 2012.

Ballèvre, M., Bosse, V., Dabard, M.-P., Ducassou, C., Fourcade, S., Paquette, J.-L., Peucat, J.-J., and Pitra, P.: Histoire Géologique du massif Armoricain: Actualité de la recherche, Bull. Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, 10–11, 5–96, 2013.

Ballèvre, M., Martínez Catalán, J. R., López-Carmona, A., Pitra, P., Abati, J., Díez Fernández, R., Ducassou, C., Arenas, R., Bosse, V., Castiñeiras, P., Fernández-Suárez, J., Barreiro, J. G., Paquette, J.-L., Peucat, J.-J., Poujol, M., Ruffet, G., and Sánchez Martínez, S.: Correlation of the nappe stack in the Ibero-Armican arc across the Bay of Biscay: a joint French-Spanish project, in: The Variscan Orogeny: Extent, timescale and the formation of the European crust, edited by: Schulmann, K., Martínez Catalán, J. R., Lardeaux, J. M., Janoušek, V., and Og-

giano, G., Geological Society Special Publications, 405, 77–113, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP405.13, 2014.

Baret, C.: Minéralogie de la Loire-Inférieure, Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Ouest France, VIII, 1–175 + 119 pl., https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1125075 (last access: 12 January 2024), 1898.

Barrois, C.: Note sur le chloritoïde du Morbihan, Bull. Soc. Minéral. France, VII, 37–43, https://doi.org/10.3406/bulmi.1884.1849, 1884.

Barrois, C.: Les pyroxénites des îles du Morbihan, Annales Soc. Géol. du Nord, XV, 69–96, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k57244478 (last access: 12 January 2024), 1887.

Barrois, C.: Carte géologique de la France au 1/80 000, Feuille Quiberon (no. 103), Service géologique national, Paris, 1897.

Baudouin, J., Bodeur, Y., and Lasnier, B.: Géologie de l'Île Dumet (Loire-Atlantique, France), Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Ouest France, 10, 109–134, 1988.

Béchennec, F. and Hallégouët, B.: Carte géologique de la France (1/50 000), feuille Quimper (346) + Notice explicative par Béchennec, F., Hallégouët, B., Thiéblemont, D., avec la collaboration de Guerrot, C., Cocherie, A., et Carn, A., BRGM, Orléans, 161 pp., ISBN 2-7159-1346-X, 1999.

Béchennec, F., Hallégouët, B., and Thinon, I.: Carte géologique de la France (1/50 000), feuille Lorient (383) + Notice explicative par Béchennec, F., Hallégouët, B., Thiéblemont, D., Thinon, I., avec la collaboration de Cocherie, A., Guerrot, C., et Lucassou, F., BRGM, Orléans, 206 pp., ISBN 978 2 7159 1383 7, 2012.

Berget, A.: Répartition géographique des Océans (détermination du pôle continental), Annales Institut océanographique, 5, 1–12, 1913.

Bosse, V., Ballèvre, M., and Vidal, O.: Ductile thrusting recorded by the garnet isograd from blueschist-facies metapelites of the Île de Groix, Armorican massif, France, J. Petrol., 43, 485–510, https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/43.3.485, 2002.

Bosse, V., Féraud, G., Ballèvre, M., Peucat, J.-J., and Corsini, M.: Rb-Sr and ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar ages in blueschists from the Île-de-Groix (Armorican Massif, France): Implications for closure mechanisms in isotopic systems, Chem. Geol., 220, 21–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.02.019, 2005.

Bouysse, P.: Recherches du B.R.G.M. sur le plateau continental; A, Résultats généraux obtenus par les premières campagnes du "Beluga" en Baie de la Vilaine et ses abords, Bull. B.R.G.M., Section 2: Géologie Appliquée, Chronique des Mines, 5, 3–17, 1966a.

Bouysse, P.: La baie de la Vilaine; étude sédimentologique et morphologique, Cahiers Océanographiques, 18, 319–341, 1966b.

Brown, M.: The petrogenesis of some migmatites from the Presqu'île de Rhuys, southern Brittany, France, in: Migmatites, Melting and Metamorphism, edited by: Atherton, M.-P., and Gribble, C.-D., Shiva Publishing, Nantwich, 174–200, ISBN 13 978 0906812266, 1983.

Brown, M. and Dallmeyer, R. D.: Rapid Variscan exhumation and the role of magma in core complex formation: southern Brittany metamorphic belt, France, J. Metamorp. Geol., 14, 361–379, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.1996.00361.x, 1996.

Burg, J. P., Van Den Driessche, J., and Brun, J.-P.: Syn-to post-thickening extension: mode and consequences, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris (Série 2), 319, 1019–1032, 1994.
Chauris, L.: Les sables lourds des plages du Mor Bras – Introduction à l'étude des placers littoraux en Bretagne méridionale, Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Ouest France, 4, 1–58, 1982.

Chauris, L.: Contribution à l'étude du littoral de la baie d'Audierne (Finistère), Nature et origine des minéraux lourds des plages, Norois, 39, 451–458, 1992.

Chauris, L.: Paragenèse des sables lourds à cassitérite de la Baie de la Vilaine (Massif Armoricain), Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Ouest France, 19, 1–13, 1997.

Delanoë, Y., Gallenne, B., Lasnier, B., and Pinot, J.-P.: Découverte par carottage sous-marin d'une association pétrographique de micaschistes à chloritoïde et de schistes verts à glaucophane autour de la Baz Moullek, à 11 km au Sud-Est de l'île de Groix (Morbihan), C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris (Série D), 274, 644–646, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5748432m/f766.item (last access: 12 January 2024), 1972.

Delor, C., Bodinier, J.-L., and Burg, J.-P.: Découverte d'éclogites à glaucophane dans la klippe de Najac (Massif Central, France); nouveaux témoins océaniques d'un stade haute pression dans la chaine de collision varisque, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris (Série 2), 302, 739–744, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6296984t/f753.item (last access: 12 January 2024), 1986.

Delor, C., Burg, J. P., Guiraud, M., and Leyreloup, A.: Les métapélites à phengite-chloritoïde-grenat-staurotide-disthène de la klippe de Najac-Carmaux: Nouveaux marqueurs d'un métamorphisme de haute pression varisque en Rouergue occidental, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris (Série 2), 305, 589–595, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k63051247/f603.item (last access: 12 January 2024), 1987.

Delorme, P.: L'île aux chimères, Éditions du Trésor, Paris, 60 pp., ISBN 979 10 91534 60 4 (br.), 2020.

Díez Fernández, R., Arenas, R., Pereira, M. F., Sánchez Martínez, S., Albert, R., Martín Parra, L.-M., Rubio Pascual, F. J., and Matas, J.: Tectonic evolution of Variscan Iberia: Gondwana-Laurussia collision revisited, Earth-Sci. Rev., 162, 269–292, 2016.

Dresch, J.: Note sur l'île Dumet (Loire-Atlantique), Norois, 11, 39–41, 1964.

Durand, S.: Le tertiaire de Bretagne. Etude stratigraphique, sédimentologique et tectonique, Mémoires Soc. Géol. minéral. Bretagne, 12, 390 pp., 1960.

Durand, S. and Milon, Y.: Le pliocène de l'estuaire de la Vilaine; étude des falaises de Pénéstin (Morbihan), Bull. Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, 1955, 1–15 + 15 pl., 1955.

El Korh, A., Schmidt, S. T., Ballèvre, M., Ulianov, A., and Bruguier, O.: Discovery of an albite gneiss from the Ile de Groix (Armorican Massif, France): geochemistry and LA-ICP-MS U–Pb geochronology of its Ordovician protolith, Int. J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.), 101, 1169–1190, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-011-0732-5, 2012.

Evensen, N. M., Hamilton, P. J., and O'Nions, R. K.: Rare-earth abundances in chondritic meteorites, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 42, 1199–1212, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(78)90114-X, 1978.

Gapais, D., Lagarde, J.-L., Le Corre, C., Audren, C., Jégouzo, P., Casas Sainz, A., and van Den Driessche, J.: La zone de cisaillement de Quiberon: témoin d'extension de la chaîne varisque en Bretagne méridionale au Carbonifère, C. R. Acad. Sci.

Paris (Série 2), 316, 1123–1129, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6316609v/f145.item (last access: 12 January 2024), 1993.

Gieré, R. and Sorensen, S. S.: Allanite and other REE-rich epidote-group minerals, in: Epidotes, edited by: Liebscher, A., and Franz, G., Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, vol. 56, 431–493, https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.56.1.431, 2004.

Gil Ibarguchi, J. I. and Dallmeyer, R. D.: Hercynian blueschist metamorphism in North Portugal: tectonothermal implications., J. Metamorph. Geol., 9, 539–549, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.1991.tb00547.x, 1991.

Gilotti, J. A., McClelland, W. C., Schorn, S., Compagnoni, R., and Coble, M. A.: Provenance, protolith and metamorphic ages of jadeite-bearing orthogneiss and host paragneiss at Tavagnasco, the Sesia Zone, Lower Aosta Valley, Italy, Eur. J. Mineral., 35, 645–658, https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-35-645-2023, 2023.

Godard, G.: Petrology of some eclogites in the Hercynides: the eclogites from the southern Armorican massif, France, in: Eclogites and Eclogite-Facies Rocks, edited by: Smith, D. C., Developments in Petrology 12, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 451–519, ISBN 13 978 0444430304, 1988.

Godard, G.: Two orogenic cycles recorded in eclogite-facies gneiss from the Southern Armorican Massif (France), Eur. J. Mineral., 21, 1173–1190, https://doi.org/10.1127/0935-1221/2009/0021-1984, 2009.

Godard, G.: La découverte de la glaucophane à Groix en 1883: histoire d'une mystification, Bull. Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, 17, 31–56, ISSN 1774-0991, 2019.

Godard, G.: PCalc2.4, ResearchGate [code], https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17290.03527, 2024.

Goujou, J.-C.: Analyse pétro-structurale dans un avant-pays métamorphique; influence du plutonisme tardi-orogénique varisque sur l'encaissant épi à mésozonal de Vendée, Documents du B.R.G.M., 216, 347 pp., ISBN 2 7159 0541 6 (br.), 1992.

Green, E. C. R., White, R. W., Diener, J. F. A., Powell, R., Holland, T. J. B., and Palin, R. M.: Activity-composition relations for the calculation of partial melting equilibria in metabasic rocks, J. Metamorp. Geol., 34, 845–869, https://doi.org/10.1111/jmg.12211, 2016.

Guigues, J. and Devismes, P.: La prospection minière à la batée dans le Massif armoricain, Mémoires du B.R.G.M., 71, 171 pp., 1969.

Guiraud, M., Burg, J.-P., and Powell, R.: Evidence for a variscan structure zone in the Vendée, France: a petrological study of blueschist facies rocks from Bois de Cené, J. Metamorph. Geol., 5, 225–237, 1987.

Gyomlai, T., Yamato, P., and Godard, G.: Petrological study of an eclogite-facies metagranite from the Champtoceaux Complex (La Picherais, Armorican Massif, France), Eur. J. Mineral., 35, 589–611, https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-35-589-2023, 2023.

Hawthorne, F. C., Oberti, R., Harlow, G. E., Maresch, W. V., Martin, R. F., Schumacher, J. C., and Welch, M. D.: Nomenclature of the amphibole supergroup, Am. Mineral. t, 97, 2031–2048, https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2012.4276, 2012.

Holland, T. J. B. and Powell, R.: Activity-composition relations for phases in petrological calculations: an asymmetric multi-component formulation, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 145, 492–501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-003-0464-z, 2003.

Holland, T. J. B. and Powell, R.: An improved and extended internally consistent thermodynamic dataset for phases of petro-
Chauris, L.: Les sables lourds des plages du Mor Bras – Introduction à l'étude des placers littoraux en Bretagne méridionale, Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Ouest France, 4, 1–58, 1982.

Chauris, L.: Contribution à l'étude du littoral de la baie d'Audierne (Finistère), Nature et origine des minéraux lourds des plages, Norois, 39, 451–458, 1992.

Chauris, L.: Paragenèse des sables lourds à cassitérite de la Baie de la Vilaine (Massif Armoricain), Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Ouest France, 19, 1–13, 1997.

Delanoë, Y., Gallenne, B., Lasnier, B., and Pinot, J.-P.: Découverte par carottage sous-marin d'une association pétrographique de micaschistes à chloritoïde et de schistes verts à glaucophane autour de la Baz Moullek, à 11 km au Sud-Est de l'île de Groix (Morbihan), C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris (Série D), 274, 644–646, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5748432m/f766.item (last access: 12 January 2024), 1972.

Delor, C., Bodinier, J.-L., and Burg, J.-P.: Découverte d'éclogites à glaucophane dans la klippe de Najac (Massif Central, France); nouveaux témoins océaniques d'un stade haute pression dans la chaine de collision varisque, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris (Série 2), 302, 739–744, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6296984t/f753.item (last access: 12 January 2024), 1986.

Delor, C., Burg, J. P., Guiraud, M., and Leyreloup, A.: Les métapélites à phengite-chloritoïde-grenat-staurotide-disthène de la klippe de Najac-Carmaux: Nouveaux marqueurs d'un métamorphisme de haute pression varisque en Rouergue occidental, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris (Série 2), 305, 589–595, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k63051247/f603.item (last access: 12 January 2024), 1987.

Delorme, P.: L'île aux chimères, Éditions du Trésor, Paris, 60 pp., ISBN 979 10 91534 60 4 (br.), 2020.

Díez Fernández, R., Arenas, R., Pereira, M. F., Sánchez Martínez, S., Albert, R., Martín Parra, L.-M., Rubio Pascual, F. J., and Matas, J.: Tectonic evolution of Variscan Iberia: Gondwana-Laurussia collision revisited, Earth-Sci. Rev., 162, 269–292, 2016.

Dresch, J.: Note sur l'île Dumet (Loire-Atlantique), Norois, 11, 39–41, 1964.

Durand, S.: Le tertiaire de Bretagne. Etude stratigraphique, sédimentologique et tectonique, Mémoires Soc. Géol. minéral. Bretagne, 12, 390 pp., 1960.

Durand, S. and Milon, Y.: Le pliocène de l'estuaire de la Vilaîne; étude des falaises de Pénéstin (Morbihan), Bull. Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, 1955, 1–15 + 15 pl., 1955.

El Korh, A., Schmidt, S. T., Ballèvre, M., Ulianov, A., and Bruguier, O.: Discovery of an albite gneiss from the Ile de Groix (Armorican Massif, France): geochemistry and LA-ICP-MS U–Pb geochronology of its Ordovician protolith, Int. J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.), 101, 1169–1190, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-011-0732-5, 2012.

Evensen, N. M., Hamilton, P. J., and O'Nions, R. K.: Rare-earth abundances in chondritic meteorites, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 42, 1199–1212, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(78)90114-X, 1978.

Gapais, D., Lagarde, J.-L., Le Corre, C., Audren, C., Jégouzo, P., Casas Sainz, A., and van Den Driessche, J.: La zone de cisaillement de Quiberon: témoin d'extension de la chaîne varisque en Bretagne méridionale au Carbonifère, C. R. Acad. Sci.

Paris (Série 2), 316, 1123–1129, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6316609v/f145.item (last access: 12 January 2024), 1993.

Gieré, R. and Sorensen, S. S.: Allanite and other REE-rich epidote-group minerals, in: Epidotes, edited by: Liebscher, A., and Franz, G., Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, vol. 56, 431–493, https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.56.1.431, 2004.

Gil Ibarguchi, J. I. and Dallmeyer, R. D.: Hercynian blueschist metamorphism in North Portugal: tectonothermal implications., J. Metamorph. Geol., 9, 539–549, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.1991.tb00547.x, 1991.

Gilotti, J. A., McClelland, W. C., Schorn, S., Compagnoni, R., and Coble, M. A.: Provenance, protolith and metamorphic ages of jadeite-bearing orthogneiss and host paragneiss at Tavagnasco, the Sesia Zone, Lower Aosta Valley, Italy, Eur. J. Mineral., 35, 645–658, https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-35-645-2023, 2023.

Godard, G.: Petrology of some eclogites in the Hercynides: the eclogites from the southern Armorican massif, France, in: Eclogites and Eclogite-Facies Rocks, edited by: Smith, D. C., Developments in Petrology 12, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 451–519, ISBN 13 978 0444430304, 1988.

Godard, G.: Two orogenic cycles recorded in eclogite-facies gneiss from the Southern Armorican Massif (France), Eur. J. Mineral., 21, 1173–1190, https://doi.org/10.1127/0935-1221/2009/0021-1984, 2009.

Godard, G.: La découverte de la glaucophane à Groix en 1883: histoire d'une mystification, Bull. Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, 17, 31–56, ISSN 1774-0991, 2019.

Godard, G.: PCalc2.4, ResearchGate [code], https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17290.03527, 2024.

Goujou, J.-C.: Analyse pétro-structurale dans un avant-pays métamorphique; influence du plutonisme tardi-orogénique varisque sur l'encaissant épi à mésozonal de Vendée, Documents du B.R.G.M., 216, 347 pp., ISBN 2 7159 0541 6 (br.), 1992.

Green, E. C. R., White, R. W., Diener, J. F. A., Powell, R., Holland, T. J. B., and Palin, R. M.: Activity-composition relations for the calculation of partial melting equilibria in metabasic rocks, J. Metamorp. Geol., 34, 845–869, https://doi.org/10.1111/jmg.12211, 2016.

Guigues, J. and Devismes, P.: La prospection minière à la batée dans le Massif armoricain, Mémoires du B.R.G.M., 71, 171 pp., 1969.

Guiraud, M., Burg, J.-P., and Powell, R.: Evidence for a variscan structure zone in the Vendée, France: a petrological study of blueschist facies rocks from Bois de Cené, J. Metamorph. Geol., 5, 225–237, 1987.

Gyomlai, T., Yamato, P., and Godard, G.: Petrological study of an eclogite-facies metagranite from the Champtoceaux Complex (La Picherais, Armorican Massif, France), Eur. J. Mineral., 35, 589–611, https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-35-589-2023, 2023.

Hawthorne, F. C., Oberti, R., Harlow, G. E., Maresch, W. V., Martin, R. F., Schumacher, J. C., and Welch, M. D.: Nomenclature of the amphibole supergroup, Am. Mineral. t, 97, 2031–2048, https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2012.4276, 2012.

Holland, T. J. B. and Powell, R.: Activity-composition relations for phases in petrological calculations: an asymmetric multi-component formulation, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 145, 492–501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-003-0464-z, 2003.

Holland, T. J. B. and Powell, R.: An improved and extended internally consistent thermodynamic dataset for phases of petro-