Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of con-
nectionist neuropsychology. *Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10*(5),
377–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299308253469

Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliotto, G. (2018). Acquisition of abstract concepts is influenced by emotional valence. *Developmental Science*, 21(2), Article e12549. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12549

Popham, S. F., Huth, A. G., Bilenko, N. Y., Deniz, F., Gao, J. S., Nunez-Elizalde, A. O., & Gallant, J. L. (2021). Visual and linguistic semantic representations are aligned at the border of human visual cortex. *Nature Neuroscience*, 24(11), 1628–1636. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00921-6

Popper, K. (2005). *The logic of scientific discovery*. Routledge.

Price, C. J., Noppeney, U., Phillips, J., & Devlin, J. T. (2003). How is the fusiform gyrus related to category-specificity? *Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20*(3), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264329044000284

Primativo, S., Reilly, J., & Crutch, S. J. (2016). Abstract conceptual feature ratings predict gaze within written word arrays: Evidence from a Visual Wor(1)d paradigm. *Cognitive Science, 41*(3), 659–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12348

Prinz, J. J. (2004). *Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis*. MIT Press.

Pulford, B. D., Colman, A. M., Buabang, E. K., & Krockow, E. M. (2018). The persuasive power of knowledge: Testing the confidence heuristic. *Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 147*(10), 1431–1444. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000471

Pulvermüller, F., Cooper-Pye, E., Dine, C., Hauk, O., Nestor, P. J., & Patterson, K. (2009). The word processing deficit in semantic dementia: All categories are equal, but some categories are more equal than others. *Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience*, 22(9), 2027–2041. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21339

Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Ilmoniemi, R. (2005). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. *Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience*, 17(6), 884–892.

Quesque, F., Apperly, I., Baillargeon, R., Baron-Cohen, S., Becchio, C., Bekkering, H., Bernstein, D., Bertoux, M., Bird, G., Bukowski, H., Burgmer, P., Carruthers, P., Catmur, C., Dziobek, I., Epley, N., Erle, T. M., Frith, C., Frith, U., Galang, C. M., ... Brass, M. (2024). Defining key concepts for mental state attribution. *Communications Psychology, 2*(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00077-6

Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. *OpenAI Blog*, 1(8), 9.

Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). Event perception. *Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science*, 2(6), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.133

Raffaele, T., Moritz, W., Elisa, B., & Angelika, L. (2019). The representational space of observed actions. *ELife*, 8, e47686. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47686

Raffman, D. (2010). Can we do without concepts? Comments on Edouard Machery. *Doing Without Concepts. Philosophical Studies*, 149(3), 423–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9529-9

Raia, R. (2023). An analysis of conceptual ambiguities in the debate on the format of concepts. *Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences*. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-023-09938-7

Ramey, C. H., Chrysikou, E. G., & Reilly, J. (2013). Snapshots of children's changing biases during language development: Differential weighting of perceptual and linguistic factors predicts noun age of acquisition. *Journal of Cognition and Development, 14*(4), 573–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.689386

Rattermann, M. J., & Gentner, D. (1998). More evidence for a relational shift in the development of analogy: Children's performance on a causal-mapping task. *Cognitive Development*, 13(4), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(98)90003-X

Reggin, L. D., Muraki, E. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2021). Development of abstract word knowledge. *Frontiers in Psychology, 12*, Article 686478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686478

Regier, T., & Kay, P. (2009). Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right. *Trends in Cognitive Sciences*, 13(10), 439–446.

Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Bolognesi, M., & Krennmayr, T. (2019). How polysemy affects concreteness ratings: The case of metaphor. *Cognitive Science*, 43(8), Article e12779. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12779

Renoult, L., Irish, M., Moscovitch, M., & Rugg, M. D. (2019). From knowing to remembering: The semantic–episodic distinction. *Trends in Cognitive Sciences*, 23(12), 1041–1057.

Renoult, L., & Rugg, M. D. (2020). An historical perspective on Endel Tulving's episodic-semantic distinction. *Neuropsychologia*, 139, Article 107366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107366

Reilly, J., & Kean, J. (2007). Formal distinctiveness of high- and low-imageability nouns: Analyses and theoretical implications. *Cognitive Science*, 31(1), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210709336988

Reilly, J., Finley, A. M., Zuckerman, B., Kelly, A., & Flurie, M. (2021). The semantics of smell: A neuropsychological case-control study of lexical-semantic processing in total anosmia. *Neurocase*, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2020.1871491

Reilly, J., Litovsky, C., Finley, A. M., & Kenett, Y. N. (2023). Bigram semantic distance as an index of continuous semantic flow in natural language: Theory, tools, and applications. *Journal of Experimental Psychology General*, 152(9), 2578–2590. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001389

Reilly, J., & Peelle, J. E. (2008). Effects of semantic impairment on language processing in semantic dementia. *Seminars in Speech and Language*, 29, 32–43.

Reilly, J., Peelle, J. E., Garcia, A., & Crutch, S. J. (2016). Linking somatic and symbolic representation in semantic memory: The dynamic multilevel reactivation framework. *Psychonomic Bulletin & Review*, 23(4), 1002–1014. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0824-5

Rissman, L., & Majid, A. (2019). Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct? *Psychonomic Bulletin & Review*, 26(6), 1850–1869. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01634-5

Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror neuron system. *Annual Review of Neuroscience*, 27(1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230

Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004a). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. *Psychological Review*, 111(1), 205–235.

Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004b). Natural selection: The impact of semantic impairment on lexical and object decision. *Cognitive Neuropsychology*, 21(2/4), 331–352.

Rogers, T. T., Patterson, K., & Graham, K. (2007). Colour knowledge in semantic dementia: It is not all black and white. *Neuropsychologia*, 45(14), 3285–3298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.020

Rollwage, M., Loosen, A., Hauser, T. U., Moran, R., Dolan, R. J., & Fleming, S. M. (2020). Confidence drives a neural confirmation bias. *Nature Communications*, 11(1), Article 2634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16278-6

Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. *Cognitive Psychology*, 4(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0

Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. B. (1978). *Principles of categorization*. Erlbaum.

Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1996). Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In E. S. Reed,
E. Turiel, & T. Brown (Eds.), *Values and knowledge* (pp. 103–135). Erlbaum.

Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Pfeiffer, C., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Body schematics: On the role of the body schema in embodied lexical–semantic representations. *Neuropsychologia*, *48*(3), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.019

Sacchett, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: A category-specific deficit for artificial objects and body parts. *Cognitive Neuropsychology*, *9*(1), 73–86.

Sadoski, M., Kealy, W. A., Goetz, E. T., & Paivio, A. (1997). Concreteness and imagery effects in the written composition of definitions. *Journal of Educational Psychology*, *89*(3), 518–526.

Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (1994). A dual coding view of imagery and verbal processes in reading comprehension. *Ruddell, Robert B.*

Saffran, E. M. (1982). Neuropsychological approaches to the study of language. *British Journal of Psychology*, *73*(3), 317–337.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01815.x

Sartori, G., Gnoato, F., Mariani, I., Prioni, S., & Lombardi, L. (2007). Semantic relevance, domain specificity and the sensory/functional theory of category-specificity. *Neuropsychologia*, *45*(5), 966–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.028

Saussure, F. D. (1916). *Cours de linguistique generale* (1907) (C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, Eds.). Philosophical Library.

Saxe, R., Carey, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. *Annual. Review of Psychology*, *55*, 87–124.

Saygin, A. P., Wilson, S. M., Hagler, D. J., Bates, E., & Sereno, M. I. (2004). Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. *Journal of Neuroscience*, *24*(27), 6181–6188. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0504-04.2004

Scholz, R. W., & Steiner, G. (2015). Transdisciplinarity at the crossroads. *Sustainability Science*, *10*(4), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0338-0

Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Stowe, R. W. (1989). Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences. *Reading Research Quarterly*, *24*(1), 114–126.

Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between deictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. *Cognitive Science*, *20*(4), 457–497. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2004_1

Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. *Behavioral and Brain Sciences*, *3*(3), 417–457.

Shallice, T., & Cooper, R. P. (2013). Is there a semantic system for abstract words? *Frontiers in Human Neuroscience*, 7(May), 175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00175

Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). The similarity-in-topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. *Cognitive Neuropsychology*, *20*(3–6), 451–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290342000032

Sloutsky, V. M., & Fisher, A. V. (2004). Induction and categorization in young children: A Similarity-based model. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: General*, *133*(2), 166–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.166

Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). *Categories and concepts*. Harvard University Press.

Snowden, J. S., Goulding, P. J., & Neary, D. (1989). Semantic dementia: A form of circumscribed cerebral atrophy. *Behavioural Neurology*, *2*, 167–182.

Snowden, J. S., Harris, J. M., Saxon, J. A., Thompson, J. C., Richardson, A. M., Jones, M., & Kobylecki, C. (2019). Naming and conceptual understanding in frontotemporal dementia. *Cortex*, *120*, 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.027

Snyder, H. R., Feigenson, K., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2007). Prefrontal cortical response to conflict during semantic and phonological tasks. *Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience*, *19*(5), 761–775.

Soja, N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1991). Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. *Cognition*, *38*(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90051-5

Son, J. Y., Smith, L. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2008). Simplicity and generalization: Short-cutting abstraction in children's object categorizations. *Cognition*, *108*(3), 626–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.002

Sowa, J. F. (1993). Lexical structures and conceptual structures. In J. Pustejovsky (Ed.), *Semantics and the lexicon* (pp. 223–262). Springer.

Speed, L. J., & Brysbaert, M. (2022). Dutch sensory modality norms. *Behavior Research Methods*, *54*(3), 1306–1318.

Spelke, E. S. (2022). *What babies know: Core knowledge and composition* (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.

Springer, K., & Keil, F. C. (1991). Early differentiation of causal mechanisms appropriate to biological and nonbiological kinds. *Child Development*, *62*(4), 767–781.

Stampoulidis, G. (2020). Polysemiotic communication vs. multimo-dality. *SAUC-StreetArt and Urban Creativity*, *5*(2), 26–31.

Striem-Amit, E., Wang, X., Bi, Y., & Caramazza, A. (2018). Neural representation of visual concepts in people born blind. *Nature communications*, *9*(1), Article 5250.

Strickland, B., & Scholl, B. J. (2015). Visual perception involves event-type representations: The case of containment versus occlusion. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: General*, *144*(3), Article 570. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037750

Surowiecki, J. (2005). *The wisdom of crowds*. Anchor.

Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. *Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior*, *15*(6), 607–620.

Tang, J., LeBel, A., Jain, S., & Huth, A. G. (2023). Semantic reconstruction of continuous language from non-invasive brain recordings. *Nature Neuroscience*, *26*(5), 858–866. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01304-9

Thompson, H. E., Noonan, K. A., Halai, A. D., Hoffman, P., Stampachchia, S., Hallam, G., Rice, G. E., Perez, B. D. D., Ralph, M. A. L., & Jefferies, E. (2022). Damage to temporoparietal cortex is sufficient for impaired semantic control. *Cortex*, *156*, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.05.022

Thompson-Schill, S. L. (1999). A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge. *Neuropsychologia*, *56*, 560–565.

Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferiorprefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, *94*(26), 14792–14797. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792

Troche, J., Crutch, S. J., & Reilly, J. (2017). Defining a conceptual topography of word concreteness: Clustering properties of emotion, sensation, and magnitude among 750 English words. *Frontiers in Psychology*, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01787

Trumpp, N. M., Kliese, D., Hoenig, K., Haarmaier, T., & Kiefer, M. (2013). Losing the sound of concepts: Damage to auditory association cortex impairs the processing of sound-related concepts. *Cortex*, *49*, 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.02.002

Trumpp, N. M., Ulrich, M., & Kiefer, M. (2024). Experiential grounding of abstract concepts: Processing of abstract mental state concepts engages brain regions involved in mentalizing, automatic speech, and lip movements. *NeuroImage*, 288, Article 120539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120539
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), *Organization of memory*. Academic Press.

Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., & Levy, J. P. (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. *Brain and Language*, 75(2), 195-231.

Ulrich, M., Harpaintner, M., Trumpp, N. M., Berger, A., & Kiefer, M. (2022). Academic training increases grounding of scientific concepts in experiential brain systems. *Cerebral Cortex*. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac449

Urcioli, P. J. (2006). Responses and acquired equivalence classes. In E. A. Wasserman & T. R. Zentall (Eds.), *Comparative cognition: Experimental explorations of animal intelligence* (pp. 405-421). Oxford University Press.

Van Overwalle, F., Manto, M., Cattaneo, Z., Clausi, S., Ferrari, C., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Guell, X., Heleven, E., Lupo, M., Ma, Q., Michelutti, M., Olivito, G., Pu, M., Rice, L. C., Schmahmann, J. D., Siciliano, L., Sokolov, A. A., Stoodley, C. J., van Dun, K., ... Leggio, M. (2020). Consensus paper: Cerebellum and social cognition. *The Cerebellum*, 19(6), 833-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-020-01155-1

Varley, R., & Siegal, M. (2020). Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and ‘theory of mind’ in an agrammatic aphasic patient. *Current Biology*, 10(12), 723-726.

Vatansever, D., Smallwood, J., & Jefferies, E. (2021). Varying demands for cognitive control reveals shared neural processes supporting semantic and episodic memory retrieval. *Nature Communications*, 12(1), Article 2134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22443-2

Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. *Cognitive Psychology*, 48(4), 422-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001

Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S.-T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2014). The neural representation of abstract words: The role of emotion. *Cerebral Cortex*, 24(7), 1767-1777. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht025

Villani, C., Loia, A., Bolognesi, M. (2024). The semantic content of concrete, abstract, specific, and generic concepts. *Language & Cognition*, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2023.64

Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (2019). Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions. *Language and Cognition*, 11(3), 403-430. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.23

Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Sensorimotor and interoceptive dimensions in concrete and abstract concepts. *Journal of Memory and Language*, 116, Article 104173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104173

Villani, C., Orsoni, M., Lugli, L., Benassi, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2022). Abstract and concrete concepts in conversation. *Scientific Reports*, 12(1), Article 17572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20785-5

Vinson, D. P., Vigliocco, G., Cappa, S., & Siri, S. (2003). The breakdown of semantic knowledge: Insights from a statistical model of meaning representation. *Brain and Language*, 86(3), 347-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00144-5

Viskontas, I. V., Morrison, R. G., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., & Knowlton, B. J. (2004). Relational integration, inhibition, and analogical reasoning in older adults. *Psychology and Aging*, 19(4), Article 581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.581

Walker, I., & Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition*, 25(5), 1256-1271.

Wang, X., Men, W., Gao, J., Caramazza, A., & Bi, Y. (2020). Two forms of knowledge representations in the human brain. *Neuron*, 107(2), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.04.010

Warren, T., & Dickey, M. W. (2021). The use of linguistic and world knowledge in language processing. *Language and Linguistics Compass*, 15(4), Article e12411.

Warrington, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. *Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology*, 27(4), 635-657.

Warrington, E. K., & Cipolotti, L. (1996). Word comprehension: The distinction between refractory and storage impairments. *Brain*, 119(2), 611-625. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.2.611

Warrington, E. K., & Crutch, S. J. (2004). A circumscribed refractory access disorder: A verbal semantic impairment sparing visual semantics. *Cognitive Neuropsychology*, 21(2/4), 299-315.

Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1979). Semantic access dyslexia. *Brain*, 102, 42-63.

Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. *Brain*, 107(3), 829-854.

Watson, C. E., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2014). Uncovering the architecture of action semantics. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance*, 40(5), 1832. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037449

Wauters, L. N., Tellings, A. E., Van Bon, W. H., & Van Haaften, A. W. (2003). Mode of acquisition of word meanings: The viability of a theoretical construct. *Applied Psycholinguistics*, 24(3), 385-406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000201

Whitney, C., Kirk, M., O'Sullivan, J., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Jefferies, E. (2011). The neural organization of semantic control: TMS evidence for a distributed network in left inferior frontal and posterior middle temporal gyrus. *Cerebral Cortex*, 21(5), 1066-1075.

Wingfield, C., & Connell, L. (2022). Sensorimotor distance: A grounded measure of semantic similarity for 800 million concept pairs. *Behavior Research Methods*, 55, 3416-3432. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01965-7

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). *Philosophical investigations*. Blackwell.

Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. *Cognition*, 69(1), 1-34.

Woollams, A. M., Cooper-Pye, E., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2008). Anomia: A doubly typical signature of semantic dementia. *Neuropsychologia*, 46(10), 2503-2514.

Wurm, M. F., & Caramazza, A. (2019). Distinct roles of temporal and frontoparietal cortex in representing actions across vision and language. *Nature Communications*, 10(1), 289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08084-y

Wurm, M. F., & Caramazza, A. (2022). Two ‘what’ pathways for action and object recognition. *Trends in Cognitive Sciences*, 26(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.003

Xiong, Z., Tian, Y., Wang, X., Wei, K., & Bi, Y. (2023). Gravity matters for the neural representations of action semantics. *Cerebral Cortex*, 33(11), 6862-6871. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad006

Yates, T. S., Sherman, B. E., & Yousif, S. R. (2023). More than a moment: What does it mean to call something an ‘event’? *Psychonomic Bulletin & Review*. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02311-4

Yee, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016). Putting concepts into context. *Psychonomic Bulletin & Review*, 23, 1015-1027. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0948-7

Zartha Sossa, J. W., Halal, W., & Hernandez Zarta, R. (2019). Delphi method: Analysis of rounds, stakeholder and statistical indicators. *Foresight*, 21(5), 525-544. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2018-0095

Zdrazilova, L., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2018). Communicating abstract meaning: Concepts revealed in words and gestures. *Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 373(1752), Article 20170138. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0138

Zhang, M., Varga, D., Wang, X., Krieger-Redwood, K., Gouws, A., Smallwood, J., & Jefferies, E. (2021). Knowing what you need to know in advance: The neural processes underpinning flexible semantic retrieval of thematic and taxonomic relations. *NeuroIm- age, 224*, Article 117405.

Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. *Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18*(5), 229–234.

**Publisher's Note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Authors and Affiliations

Jamie Reilly¹ ID · Cory Shain² · Valentina Borghesani³ · Philipp Kuhnke⁴,⁴¹ · Gabriella Vigliocco⁵ · Jonathan E. Peelle⁶ ·

Bradford Z. Mahon⁷ · Laurel J. Buxbaum⁸ · Asifa Majid⁹ · Marc Brysbaert¹⁰ · Anna M. Borghi¹¹ · Simon De Deyne¹² ·

Guy Dove¹³ · Liuba Papeo¹⁴ · Penny M. Pexman¹⁵ · David Poeppel¹⁶ · Gary Lupyan¹⁷ · Paulo Boggio¹⁸ ·

Gregory Hickok¹⁹ · Laura Gwilliams²⁰ · Leonardo Fernandino²¹ · Daniel Mirman²² · Evangelia G. Chrysikou²³ ·

Chaleece W. Sandberg²⁴ · Sebastian J. Crutch²⁵ · Liina Pylkkänen¹⁶ · Eiling Yee²⁶ · Rebecca L. Jackson²⁷ ·

Jennifer M. Rodd⁵ · Marina Bedny²⁸ · Louise Connell²⁹ · Markus Kiefer³⁰ · David Kemmerer³¹ · Greig de Zubicaray³² ·

Elizabeth Jefferies³⁵ · Dermot Lynott²⁹ · Cynthia S.Q. Siew³³ · Rutvik H. Desai³⁴ · Ken McRae¹⁵ · Michele T. Diaz²⁴ ·

Marianna Bolognesi³⁵ · Evelina Fedorenko² · Swathi Kiran³⁶ · Maria Montefinese³⁷ · Jeffrey R. Binder²¹ ·

Melvin J. Yap⁴,³⁸ · Gesa Hartwigsen⁴,⁴¹ · Jessica Cantlon⁷ · Yanchao Bi²²,³⁹ · Paul Hoffman²² · Frank E. Garcea⁴⁰ ·

David Vinson²⁵

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

Jamie Reilly
reillyj@temple.edu

1. Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

3. University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

4. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany

5. University College London, London, UK

6. Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

7. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

8. Thomas Jefferson University, Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA

9. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

10. University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

11. Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

12. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

13. University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA

14. Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University Claude-Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France

15. Western University, London, ON, Canada

16. New York University, New York, NY, USA

17. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

18. Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo, Brazil

19. University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

20. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

21. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA

22. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

23. Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

24. Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA

25. University College London, London, UK

26. University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

27. University of York, York, UK

28. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

29. Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland

30. Ulm University, Ulm, Germany

31. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

32. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

33. National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

34. University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

35. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

36. Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

37. University of Padua, Padua, Italy

38. National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

39. Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

40. University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

41. Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>