# First Detection of Hepatitis E Virus (Rocahepevirus ratti Genotype C1) in Synanthropic Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus) in Romania

Daniela Porea, Cristian Raileanu, Luciana Alexandra Crivei, Vasilica Gotu, Gheorghe Savuta, Nicole Pavio

► To cite this version:

Daniela Porea, Cristian Raileanu, Luciana Alexandra Crivei, Vasilica Gotu, Gheorghe Savuta, et al. First Detection of Hepatitis E Virus (Rocahepevirus ratti Genotype C1) in Synanthropic Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus) in Romania. Viruses, 2023, 15 (6), pp.1337. 10.3390/v15061337. hal-04305538

HAL Id: hal-04305538

https://hal.science/hal-04305538v1

Submitted on 27 Dec 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
Article

# First Detection of Hepatitis E Virus (Rocahepevirus ratti Genotype C1) in Synanthropic Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus) in Romania

Daniela Porea<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" /> ID, Cristian Raileanu<fnref n="1" />, Luciana Alexandra Crivei<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="3" />, Vasilica Gotu<fnref n="4" />, Gheorghe Savuta<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="3" />,†
and Nicole Pavio<fnref n="5" />,*,†

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Porea, D.; Raileanu, C.; Crivei, L.A.; Gotu, V.; Savuta, G.; Pavio, N. First Detection of Hepatitis E Virus (*Rocahepevirus ratti* Genotype C1) in Synanthropic Norway Rats (*Rattus norvegicus*) in Romania. *Viruses* **2023**, *15*, 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15061337

Academic Editor: François-Loïc Cosset

Received: 30 April 2023

Revised: 1 June 2023

Accepted: 5 June 2023

Published: 7 June 2023

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2023 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

**Abstract:** Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an emerging zoonotic pathogen with different viral genera and species reported in a wide range of animals. Rodents, particularly rats, carry the specific genus rat HEV (*Rocahepevirus genus*, genotype C1) and are exposed occasionally to HEV-3 (*Paslahepevirus genus*, genotype 3), a zoonotic genotype identified in humans and widely distributed in domestic and feral pigs. In this study, the presence of HEV was investigated in synanthropic Norway rats from Eastern Romania, in areas where the presence of HEV-3 was previously reported in pigs, wild boars and humans. Using methods capable of detecting different HEV species, the presence of HEV RNA was investigated in 69 liver samples collected from 52 rats and other animal species. Nine rat liver samples were identified as being positive for rat HEV RNA (17.3%). High sequence identity (85–89% nt) was found with other European *Rocahepevirus*. All samples tested from other animal species, within the same environment, were negative for HEV. This is the first study to demonstrate the presence of HEV in rats from Romania. Since rat HEV has been reported to cause zoonotic infections in humans, this finding supports the need to extend the diagnosis of *Rocahepevirus* in humans with suspicion of hepatitis.

**Keywords:** hepatitis E virus; rats; *Rocahepevirus*; phylogenetic analysis; Romania

## 1. Introduction

Hepatitis E virus (HEV), the causative agent of hepatitis E in humans, is a single-stranded positive sense RNA virus that belongs to the *Hepeviridae* family. HEV genome comprises three open reading frames (ORFs), encoding the non-structural polyprotein (ORF1), the capsid protein (ORF2) and the phosphoprotein (ORF3). According to the current data of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), the family *Hepeviridae* includes two subfamilies, *Orthohepevirinae* and *Parahepevirinae*, and five genera, *Paslahepevirus*, *Avihepevirus*, *Rocahepevirus*, *Chirohepevirus* and *Piscihepevirus* [1]. Most of the HEV strains identified belong to the *Paslahepevirus* genus (previously named *Orthohepevirus A*), which is divided into two species, *P. balayani* and *P. alci*, and have been isolated mainly from humans, domestic pigs, wild boars, rabbits, deer, and camels. The *P. balayani* species comprises eight

<footnote n="1">¹ Department of Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Iași University of Life Sciences, 700490 Iași, Romania; daniela.porea@yahoo.com (D.P.); cristian.raileanu@yahoo.com (C.R.); criveilucianaalexandra@gmail.com (L.A.C.); epirovet@yahoo.com (G.S.)</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Laboratories and Research Stations Department, Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, 820112 Tulcea, Romania</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Regional Center of Advanced Research for Emerging Diseases, Zoonoses and Food Safety Iași, University of Life Sciences, 700490 Iași, Romania</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Department of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agronomical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 011464 Bucharest, Romania; gotuvasilica@yahoo.com</footnote>

<footnote n="5">5 Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de L'alimentation de L'environnement et du Travail (ANSES), Institut National de Recherche pour L'agriculture L'alimentation et L'environnement (INRAE), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (ENVA), UMR Virology, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: nicole.pavio@anses.fr; Tel.: +33-1-43-96-72-09</footnote>

<footnote>† These authors contributed equally to this work.</footnote>
different genotypes (HEV-1 to HEV-8), of which four main genotypes (HEV-1 to HEV 4) can infect humans [2]. The first two genotypes (HEV-1 and HEV-2) are restricted to humans and are endemic to developing countries, while the other two genotypes (HEV-3 and HEV-4) are zoonotic, infect humans, domestic pigs, wild boar, deer and rabbits, and cause sporadic cases worldwide [3]. Genotypes HEV-5 and HEV-6 infect wild boars, HEV-7 infects dromedary camels and humans, while HEV-8 infects Bactrian camels and cynomolgus macaques [4]. The species *P. alci* has been proposed for an HEV strain isolated from moose in Sweden. The other three genera of the subfamily *Orthohepevirinae* infect birds (*Avihepevirus*), rodents, shrews and carnivores (*Rocahepevirus*) and bats (*Chirohepevirus*) [1]. Of these, the *Rocahepevirus* genus is not restricted to its main hosts, but the occurrence of strains of this genus in humans has been reported as well [5]. Members of the subfamily *Parahepevirinae* infect trout and salmon [1].

The *Rocahepevirus* genus (previously named *Orthohepevirus C*, HEV-C) is divided into two species, *R. eothenomi* and *R. ratti*, and the *R. ratti* species comprises two genotypes (HEV-C1 and -C2) [6]. HEV-C1 has been detected in rodents (*Rattus* sp., *Bandicota indica*), eulipotyphlids (musk shrew, *Suncus murinus*) and humans, while the C2 genotype has been detected in mustelids (ferret and mink). HEV-C2 has been detected in companion ferrets (*Mustela putorius*) in the Netherlands, the USA and Japan and in farmed minks, but not in wild ones, in Denmark [7,8]. Strains related to ferrets and rat hepeviruses have also been detected in foxes in The Netherlands and Germany [9,10]. The species *R. eothenomi* has been detected in various vole species (e.g., *Microtus arvalis*, *Eothenomys melanogaster* and *Eothenomys inez*) in Hungary, Germany, the Czech Republic and China, and in Chevrier's field mouse (*Apodemus chevrieri*) [11–13]. Two putative genotypes, HEV-C3 and HEV-C4, can be defined within this species [12].

The main host of the *R. ratti* species, HEV-C1, is rodents, and although it has been identified in humans, the zoonotic potential of rat HEV strains remains to be better investigated [5,14]. The detection of rat HEV in humans with acute hepatitis and the worldwide distribution of rat HEV in rodents suggest that rat HEV infection may be an emerging disease [5]. Infections with rat HEV in humans have been described in Hong Kong, Canada, Spain and France in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients [5,15–17]. Severe outcomes were described, with fatalities in at least two cases [5,18] and chronic infection in one case [17].

The first recording of HEV in rodents was documented in Germany in 2010, with the identified strains belonging to rat HEV [19]. In the Norway rat (*Rattus norvegicus*), the main rodent carrying HEV, both rat HEV and HEV-3 were detected [4]. Since then, rat HEV has been detected in several countries, and in different species of rodents: in Norway rats and black rats (*R. rattus*) from Germany and other European countries (France, Denmark, Austria, Switzerland, the Czech Republic, Belgium, Greece, Lithuania, Great Britain, Italy and Hungary), the USA and Indonesia, tanezumi rats (*Rattus tanezumi*) from Vietnam, and bandicoot rats (*Bandicota indica*), *Rattus flavipectus*, and *Rattus rattoides* losea from China [20–26]. At the same time, a series of studies have reported the presence of HEV-3 in rodents in different parts of the world: in Norway rats from Japan, the USA, Belgium and Great Britain, in black rats from the USA and Italy, in house mice (*Mus musculus*) from Great Britain, in yellow-necked mice (*Apodemus flavicollis*) from Croatia and in capybaras (*Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris*) from Brazil [22,24,25,27–30]. Some of these studies, based on the detection of HEV-3 only in the intestine/feces but not in the liver, suggested that the presence of HEV-3 in rodents was associated with the ingestion of swine feces containing the virus rather than with infection [24,25].

In addition, serological studies have been conducted to determine HEV seroprevalence in various species of Rodentia (Muridae and Cricetidae) and Soricomorpha. According to the data summarized by Wang et al., until 2020, 23 species from eight countries (the USA, Japan, Germany, China, Vietnam, Lithuania, Indonesia, and India) were found to be positive for anti-HEV antibodies. The most investigated species were *Rattus norvegicus* and *Rattus rattus*. These two species present the highest seroprevalence rates recorded (in the USA, up to 77% and 90%, respectively) [6].
The role of rats in the transmission of the zoonotic HEV-3 genotype, the most commonly detected genotype in humans worldwide, the main animal reservoir of which is domestic pigs [14,31], also needs to be clarified.

In Romania, the HEV has been recorded, following the investigation and identification of the HEV-3 in pigs, wild boars and humans, especially in the Eastern region of the country [32–34]. Based on these records, we pointed out that pigs and wild boars could be an endemic source of human HEV-3 infections [33]. With this new study, we aimed to identify and characterize the circulating HEV strains in rats, in order to assess the role of this species in the epidemiology of HEV transmission to humans or pigs in the studied area. Moreover, this study aimed at the identification of the HEV in other wild animals living in the same habitats as rats.

## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. *Sample Collection*

In 2016, a total of 69 liver samples were collected from seven wild animal species in different counties in Eastern Romania, as follows:

- Fifty-two rats—Norway rats (*Rattus norvegicus*) from four counties: Suceava, Iasi, Bacau and Tulcea (Figure 1, Table 1);

- Nine foxes (*Vulpes vulpes*) from Vrancea county (Figure 1);

- Four ferrets (*Mustela putorius*), one from Iasi County and three from Tulcea County, one coypu (*Myocastor coypus*) and one muskrat (*Ondatra zibethicus*) from Tulcea County, one mole (*Talpa europaea*) from Suceava County and one mouse (*Mus musculus*) from Iasi County (Figure 1).

The rats were trapped in the course of pest control programs, the foxes were legally hunted and collected by the National Sanitary Veterinary Authority during the rabies monitoring program, and the other species were either road-killed or died a natural death. Necropsy and collection of tissue samples from rodents were performed in the Department of Public Health of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Iasi University of Life Sciences. The animal species were identified based on their morphological characteristics. Rats were trapped at various locations near human settlements and animal farms (Table 1).

In 2017, 10 pool fecal samples were collected from two indoor pig farms (*Sus scrofa domesticus*) where rats were trapped, six from a semi-intensive pig farm in Bacau County and four from an intensive pig farm in Tulcea County. The samples collected from Bacau came from fattening pigs, and those from Tulcea came from growing and fattening pigs. Each pool contained samples from 10 individuals.

Following collection, the samples were stored at -80 °C until further testing.

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Data on the tested samples from rats.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">No.</th><th rowspan="2">Location/Site</th><th colspan="4">Number of Rats/Location/Counties</th></tr><tr><th>Suceava</th><th>Iasi</th><th>Bacau</th><th>Tulcea</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Intensive system pig farm</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Semi-intensive system pig farm</td><td>5</td><td>-</td><td>11</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Extensive system pig farm</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>5</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Farm with different animal species, forestry site</td><td>10</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Cattle farm, metropolitan area</td><td>-</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Urban settlements, near garbage cans</td><td>-</td><td>5</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Rural settlements, population's household</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>2</td></tr></tbody><tfoot><tr><td>Total</td><td></td><td>16</td><td>6</td><td>16</td><td>14</td></tr></tfoot></table>
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Geographical distribution of the counties included in the study, with the representation of the analyzed species. This figure was created using the Quantum Geographic Information System (GIS) (version 3.28.5-Firenze). (Animal pictograms sources: www.flaticon.com, www.thenounproject.com/icon/ and www.dreamtime.com/, accessed date: 28 March 2023).</figcaption></figure>

## 2.2. RNA Extraction and Gene Amplification—PCR Assays

RNA extraction from liver samples followed the protocol previously described by Porea et al., 2018 [33]. For fecal samples, the protocol previously described by Aniță et al., 2014 was used [32]. Total RNA was extracted from 30 mg liver samples or 200 µL 10% fecal suspensions using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) and QIAamp Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen), respectively. RNA was eluted twice with 40 µL of RNase-free water after 1 min of incubation at room temperature. RNA was aliquoted and stored at -80 °C until use.

For the molecular detection of HEV RNA from liver samples, three different assays were used. A TaqMan real-time RT-PCR assay [35,36] and a RT-nested PCR [37,38] specific for HEV genotypes 1–4 were performed as previously described by Porea et al., 2018 [33]. The RT-nested PCR assay was also used to detect HEV RNA from pig faecal samples. The TaqMan real-time RT-PCR assay targets a fragment of ORF3 and the RT-nested PCR one of the ORF2, which are highly conserved regions in different HEV genotypes (Supplementary Table S1).
A nested broad-spectrum RT-PCR (NBS-RT-PCR) for hepeviruses, including rat HEV, was also performed by amplifying a fragment of ORF1 with two sets of degenerate primers [39] (Supplementary Table S1). The assay was adapted from the method previously described by Johne et al., 2010 [39]. The cDNA was synthesized according to the method previously described by Barnaud et al. 2019 [36]. The first round of PCR was performed with the outer pair of primers (HEV-cs and HEV-cas) using the Platinum® Taq DNA Polymerase kit (Life Technologies, Villebon-sur-Yvette, France). The thermal profile included 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s and 74 °C for 45 s, with a final incubation at 74 °C for 5 min. The second round of PCR was performed with the inner primer pair (HEV-csn and HEV-casn) by using the thermal profile previously described by Johne et al., 2010 [39].

Each experiment included several control samples. For the detection of HEV in wild animals, negative and positive wild boar samples, stored at the UMR Virology, Maisons-Alfort, France, were used [40]. For the detection of HEV in pigs, a sample (roFPR4) stored in the molecular biology laboratory of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Iași, Romania was used as a positive control [32].

The PCR products were analyzed after migration on agarose gel and ethidium bromide staining (Supplementary Figure S1).

## 2.3. Nucleotide Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

Sequencing of the amplicons with the expected size was performed by MWG Biotech AG (Eurofins MWG, Ebersberg, Germany) using the Sanger method. Sequencing of PCR products was performed for each direction. Specific inner primer pairs were used for the sequencing of positive RT-nested PCR amplicons. Nucleotide sequences were analyzed and individually edited using Bioedit software (version 7.2.5). Sequences were uploaded into the alignment explorer of MEGA 7 [41] and aligned with MUSCLE [42]. A phylogenetic tree was built using the neighbor-joining method based on the Tamura Nei model [43] with 1000 replicates. Reference sequences for members of the subfamily *Orthohepevirinae* were used [1].

# 3. Results

## 3.1. Detection of HEV RNA

The two assays specific for HEV genotypes 1–4 revealed that all liver samples were negative for these genotypes. Additionally, the RT-nested PCR assay revealed that the fecal samples from the pigs were also negative.

Using the nested broad-spectrum RT-PCR assay, HEV RNA was detected only in liver samples from rats (9/52, 17.30%). Positive rats originated from each analyzed county and from four of the seven sites studied that were located near livestock farms (Table 2).

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Molecular detection of HEV genome.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Species</th><th rowspan="2">Type of Samples</th><th colspan="5">County</th></tr><tr><th>Suceava</th><th>Iași</th><th>Bacau</th><th>Tulcea</th><th>Vrancea</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Wild</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><em>Rattus norvegicus</em></td><td></td><td>3/16 (3/10 <sup>4</sup>)</td><td>1/6 (1/1 <sup>5</sup>)</td><td>2/16 (2/11 <sup>2</sup>)</td><td>3/14 (3/12 <sup>1</sup>)</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><em>Vulpes vulpes</em></td><td>Liver</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0/9</td></tr><tr><td><em>Mustela putorius</em></td><td></td><td>-</td><td>0/1</td><td>-</td><td>0/3</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><em>Mus musculus</em></td><td></td><td>-</td><td>0/1</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><em>Talpa europaea</em></td><td></td><td>0/1</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><em>Myocastor coypus</em></td><td></td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0/1</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><em>Ondatra zibethicus</em></td><td></td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0/1</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Domestic</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><em>Sus scrofa domesticus</em></td><td>Pool faecal</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0/10</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote>1, 2, 4, 5 Numbers corresponding to the different settings indicated in Table 1 (column 1).</footnote>
## 3.2. HEV Sequence Analysis

The nine RT-nested PCR products that were positive for HEV RNA were sequenced. BLAST analysis showed that all isolates belonged to the rat HEV-C1. Nucleotide identity between our isolates and homologs in the GenBank database ranged from 80% to 89%. This was observed with respect to human isolates from Spain (80%) and to rat isolates from Denmark, Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, the USA and China (85–89%) (Figure 2 and Table 3).

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Phylogenetic tree based on the alignment of the generated sequences with the best hits to our sequences in GenBank and with reference sequences for the members of the subfamily *Othohepevirinae* [1]. Countries of origin of the rat HEV sequences used are as follows: RO, Romania; DE, Germany; BE, Belgium; DK, Denmark; ES, Spain; TR, Turkey; USA, the United States; CN, China; ID, Indonesia; VN, Vietnam (the rat HEV strains obtained in our study are highlighted by black diamonds). Putative rat HEV-C1 genotypes are indicated GI, genotype 1; GII, genotype 2; GIII, genotype 3. The phylogenetic tree was built using the neighbor-joining method based on the Tamura Nei model with 1000 replicates. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree.</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 3.** HEV sequence BLAST analysis.</caption><thead><tr><th>Sample Number</th><th>County</th><th>Accession Number</th><th>Best Sequence Identity (%) Country</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SiD</td><td>Iasi</td><td>OQ601523</td><td>MH729811 (87%) CN</td></tr><tr><td>StIF-1</td><td>Tulcea</td><td>OQ601529</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>StIF-5</td><td>Tulcea</td><td>OQ601530</td><td>KC294199 (89%) DK</td></tr><tr><td>StIF-7</td><td>Tulcea</td><td>OQ601531</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ssv4-1</td><td>Suceava</td><td>OQ601526</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ssv4-2</td><td>Suceava</td><td>OQ601527</td><td>ON644869 (89%) NL</td></tr><tr><td>Ssv4-8</td><td>Suceava</td><td>OQ601528</td><td>OM037396 (89%) CN</td></tr><tr><td>SbcS-1</td><td>Bacau</td><td>OQ601524</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>SbcS-6</td><td>Bacau</td><td>OQ601525</td><td>KX774658 (87%) DE</td></tr></tbody></table>

Country abbreviations: CN, China; DE, Germany; DK, Denmark; NL, the Netherlands.

The obtained isolates were clustered according to county (Figure 2) with nucleotide identities ranging from 85 to 91%. Interestingly, the highest nucleotide identity (91%) was found between the isolate from a rat in Iasi County (SisD, GenBank accession number OQ601523), captured near a cattle farm, and the isolates from rats in Tulcea County (StIF-1, StIF-5 and StIF-7, GenBank accession numbers: OQ601529, OQ601530, and OQ601531, respectively) caught near an intensive pig farm (Figure 2 and Table 3). These isolates had a maximum nucleotide identity of 89% with an isolate obtained from a rat in Denmark (GenBank accession number KC294199.1). Additionally, the isolate from a rat in Iasi County had 87% nucleotide identity with two isolates from rats in the United States (GenBank accession numbers JF516246 and KM516906.1) and one isolate from rat in China (GenBank accession number MH729811).

The isolates obtained from rats in Suceava County (Ssv4-1, Ssv4-2 and Ssv4-8, GenBank accession numbers: OQ601526, OQ601527, and OQ601528, respectively) had a maximum nucleotide identity of 89% with two isolates obtained from rats in China and the Netherlands (GenBank accession numbers OM037396 and ON644869) (Table 3).

Isolates obtained from rats in Bacau County (SbcS-1 and SbcS-6, GenBank accession numbers OQ601524 and OQ601525) had a maximum nucleotide identity of 87% with two isolates obtained from rats in Germany and Belgium (GenBank accession numbers KX774658, and KY938022, respectively) (Table 3).

## 4. Discussion

In the epidemiology of HEV infection, the role of rodents is currently debated worldwide, as the presence of the HEV-3 genotype in rats as well as the rat HEV genotype in humans has been described.

In this study, we sought to identify the HEV strains circulating in rodents from Eastern Romania, where we previously reported the presence of HEV-3 in pigs, wild boars, and humans [32–34]. Among the analyzed species, HEV RNA was detected only in rat liver samples. Sequencing of the obtained amplicons highlighted that all isolates belonged to the rat HEV-C1 genotype, and no strains belonging to other genotypes were identified. Previous study conducted by Aniță et al., 2014 [32] in Romania showed that HEV strains identified in pigs belong to HEV-3, and several situations have been described worldwide in which HEV-3 was found in rats living near animal farms or human. The study published by Kanai et al., 2012 [27] showed that strains isolated from rats captured near a pig farm in Japan were genetically related to the pig strain, which belongs to HEV-3. On the other hand, the study by Li et al. 2013 [44] in China found that HEV strains identified in rats caught near both garbage cans and pig farms were not related to HEV strains identified in other mammalian species. The detection of an HEV-3 sequence in a sample taken from a rat in Belgium highlighted the need for further studies to assess the possibility of “spillover”
infection of rats with human pathogenic hepeviruses and its public health implications [22]. Furthermore, De Sabato et al., 2020 [25] found that the intestinal contents of two rats were positive for rat HEV and HEV-3 RNAs, while the liver samples of both animals were negative. Thus, rodents could be exposed to and infected with HEV-3 but are not responsible for sufficient viral amplification and a source of transmission to other hosts. In our study, similar to the cited studies, we focused on assessing the circulation of rat HEV and HEV-3 in rats rather than determining rat HEV in swine and other animals. Indeed, the presence of the virus has been investigated in humans in a limited number of countries, including Hong Kong, France, Spain and Germany, and has been detected in patients with acute hepatitis in Hong Kong and Spain and in chronic hepatitis in France [5,15,17,45,46]. The transmission pathway of rat HEV from natural host to human remains to be identified.

The phylogenetic and blast analyses revealed that the nucleotide identity between our isolates and the homologues in the GenBank database ranged from 80% to 89% and that our isolates were related to rat HEV strains circulating in Europe. The nucleotide identity between our isolates ranged from 85% to 91%, and phylogenetic analysis showed that they were clustered by county (Figure 2). In Germany, phylogenetic analysis of partial sequences and the whole rat HEV genome showed clear clustering of isolated strains according to the geographic sampling area [19,47]. In France, the increased proportion of homology between isolated strains was correlated with the occurrence of HEV in rats captured at a single site [21]. Isolated strains from rats in France are genetically related to rat isolates from Germany and Denmark and are divergent from a strain identified in Vietnam [21]. Phylogenetic analysis showed that these observations are also similar to our isolates (Figure 2). In general, genome diversity of rat HEV has been observed in several studies, and phylogenetic analysis revealed three distinct clusters within this genotype C1, which could constitute three possible subtypes (GI, GII, GIII) [14,44,48]. The diversity between genotypes is 19.5–23.5 (22.0 ± 1.7)% [48]. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the sequences from Romania are closely related to rat HEV sequences from Northern Europe, such as from Denmark [49] or Belgium and Germany (Figure 2, Table 3). These sequences clustered within the proposed subtype GI, but are more distant from those of Southern Europe such as Spain and may constitute a new European clade or subtype. The analysis of complete genomes would improve this comparison. As rat populations may have followed trade routes, the identification of other sequences from different countries would contribute to drawing a possible map of rat HEV virus evolution and spread.

In this study, HEV RNA was detected in 9 of the 52 samples collected from rats. The prevalence (17.30%) is generally consistent with prevalence rates previously reported in European countries [22]. The results showed that HEV was present in rats from all of the studied counties (Table 2), indicating a broad geographical distribution of rat HEV in this species in the study area. The presence of HEV RNA in rats captured from different locations (Table 2), regardless of the number of animals studied, suggests that the virus circulates in these rodent species with various habitats. Similar observations were made in studies in Germany, where HEV was detected in rats caught in all cities studied in northeastern and southwestern Germany [47]. The literature indicates that the virus has been detected in rats caught near urban and rural settlements in Germany and other European countries [22], near pig farms in Japan [27], and in the proximity of urban and rural settlements and waste and pig farms in China [44]. Similar to recent studies in Italy [25], Lithuania [23] and Great Britain [24], in our study, rat HEV was identified in rats captured near animal farms.

Samples from the other species, included in this study, were identified as HEV RNA-negative. For three of the species, HEV was previously reported in other European countries, namely HEV-C2 in ferrets (*Mustela putorius*) in the Netherlands [7], HEV-3 in house mice (*Mus musculus*) in the UK [50], and strains related to ferrets and rat HEV in foxes (*Vulpes vulpes*) in the Netherlands and Germany [9,10]. In two other studies, despite previous reports, HEV was not detected in house mice in the UK [24] and rats in Austria [51], and factors such as variability in assay sensitivity and investigation of a single tissue type
were suggested. Additionally, the results of the study conducted by Lhomme et al. in 2015 [52] showed that HEV RNA was not detected in the 78 samples collected from French coypu. The authors of the study suggested that one of the possible reasons for this result could be the non-specificity of the primers used to detect HEV in these rodents. In the present study, the small number of samples, by animal species, is a limitation. It would be recommended to pursue this work with a larger collection of samples.

**5. Conclusions**

The first detection and molecular characterization of rat HEV in Romania represent the novelty of the present study.

The results of the molecular investigations regarding the presence of hepatitis E virus in rats allowed the classification of the isolated strains into the rat HEV genotype and indicated the presence of a new source of infection in the study area.

To better assess the role of rats in the epidemiology of HEV infection in humans, it is recommended to screen for rat HEV in humans with a suspicion of hepatitis and other animals in close contact with rats.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v15061337/s1, Table S1: HEV genotypes targeted and primers used for each assay and Figure S1: Analysis of the results obtained by means of broad-spectrum RT-PCR for 10 samples collected from rats in Tulcea County.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, D.P., G.S. and N.P.; methodology, D.P., G.S. and N.P.; software, D.P. and C.R.; validation, G.S. and N.P.; formal analysis, D.P. and N.P.; investigation, D.P., L.A.C., V.G., G.S. and N.P.; resources, D.P., V.G., G.S. and N.P.; data curation, D.P., C.R. and L.A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, D.P.; writing—review and editing, D.P., G.S. and N.P.; visualization, D.P., G.S. and N.P.; supervision, G.S. and N.P.; project administration, D.P., G.S. and N.P.; funding acquisition, D.P., G.S. and N.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Ethical review and approval were not required for this study because samples were collected from animals trapped or hunted within the mentioned programs.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** The sequences are submitted in the GenBank database under accession numbers: OQ601523–OQ601531.

**Acknowledgments:** We would like to express our gratitude to Anca Matfei (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Iasi University of Life Sciences), Stefan Raileanu, Mihai Marinov, Vasile Alexe and Alexandru Catalin Dorosencu (“Danube Delta” National Institute for Research and Development), for assisting with sample collection. Additionally, we would like to thank Marian Mierla (“Danube Delta” National Institute for Research and Development) for designing the map. We would like to thank Antonin Demange for his technical help and fruitful discussions.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

**References**

1. Purdy, M.A.; Drexler, J.F.; Meng, X.-J.; Norder, H.; Okamoto, H.; Van der Poel, W.H.M.; Reuter, G.; de Souza, W.M.; Ulrich, R.G.; Smith, D.B. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Hepeviridae 2022. *J. Gen. Virol.* **2022**, *103*, 001778. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Wang, B.; Yang, X.-L. Chirohepevirus from Bats: Insights into Hepatitis E Virus Diversity and Evolution. *Viruses* **2022**, *14*, 905. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Kamar, N.; Izopet, J.; Pavio, N.; Aggarwal, R.; Labrique, A.; Wedemeyer, H.; Dalton, H.R. Hepatitis E Virus Infection. *Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim.* **2017**, *3*, 17086. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Wang, L.; Teng, J.L.L.; Lau, S.K.P.; Sridhar, S.; Fu, H.; Gong, W.; Li, M.; Xu, Q.; He, Y.; Zhuang, H.; et al. Transmission of a Novel Genotype of Hepatitis E Virus from Bactrian Camels to Cynomolgus Macaques. *J. Virol.* **2019**, *93*, e02014-18. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Rivero-Juarez, A.; Frias, M.; Perez, A.B.; Pineda, J.A.; Reina, G.; Fuentes-Lopez, A.; Freyre-Carrillo, C.; Ramirez-Arellano, E.; Alados, J.C.; Rivero, A. Orthohepevirus C Infection as an Emerging Cause of Acute Hepatitis in Spain: First Report in Europe. *J. Hepatol.* **2022**, *77*, 326–331. [CrossRef]

6. Wang, B.; Harms, D.; Yang, X.-L.; Bock, C.-T. Orthohepevirus C: An Expanding Species of Emerging Hepatitis E Virus Variants. *Pathogens* **2020**, *9*, 154. [CrossRef]

7. Raj, V.S.; Smits, S.L.; Pas, S.D.; Provacia, L.B.V.; Moorman-Roest, H.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.E.; Haagmans, B.L. Novel Hepatitis E Virus in Ferrets, the Netherlands. *Emerg. Infect. Dis.* **2012**, *18*, 1369–1370. [CrossRef]

8. Krog, J.S.; Breum, S.Ø.; Jensen, T.H.; Larsen, L.E. Hepatitis E Virus Variant in Farmed Mink, Denmark. *Emerg. Infect. Dis.* **2013**, *19*, 2028–2030. [CrossRef]

9. Bodewes, R.; van der Giessen, J.; Haagmans, B.L.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.E.; Smits, S.L. Identification of Multiple Novel Viruses, Including a Parvovirus and a Hepevirus, in Feces of Red Foxes. *J. Virol.* **2013**, *87*, 7758–7764. [CrossRef]

10. Eiden, M.; Dähnert, L.; Spoerel, S.; Vina-Rodriguez, A.; Schröder, R.; Conraths, F.J.; Groschup, M.H. Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of Hepatitis E Virus Infection in Foxes (Vulpes Vulpes) in Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany, 1993–2012. *Front. Microbiol.* **2020**, *11*, 115. [CrossRef]

11. Kurucz, K.; Hederics, D.; Bali, D.; Kemenesi, G.; Horváth, G.; Jakab, F. Hepatitis E Virus in Common Voles (*Microtus Arvalis*) from an Urban Environment, Hungary: Discovery of a Cricetidae-Specific Genotype of Orthohepevirus C. *Zoonoses Public Health* **2019**, *66*, 259–263. [CrossRef]

12. Wang, B.; Li, W.; Zhou, J.-H.; Li, B.; Zhang, W.; Yang, W.-H.; Pan, H.; Wang, L.-X.; Bock, C.T.; Shi, Z.-L.; et al. Chevrier's Field Mouse (Apodemus Chevrieri) and Père David's Vole (Eothenomys Melanogaster) in China Carry Orthohepeviruses That Form Two Putative Novel Genotypes Within the Species Orthohepevirus C. *Virol. Sin.* **2018**, *33*, 44–58. [CrossRef]

13. Ryll, R.; Heckel, G.; Corman, V.M.; Drexler, J.F.; Ulrich, R.G. Genomic and Spatial Variability of a European Common Vole Hepatitis. *Arch. Virol.* **2019**, *164*, 2671–2682. [CrossRef]

14. Doceul, V.; Bagdassarian, E.; Demange, A.; Pavio, N. Zoonotic Hepatitis E Virus: Classification, Animal Reservoirs and Transmission Routes. *Viruses* **2016**, *8*, 270. [CrossRef]

15. Sridhar, S.; Yip, C.C.Y.; Lo, K.H.Y.; Wu, S.; Situ, J.; Chew, N.F.S.; Leung, K.H.; Chan, H.S.Y.; Wong, S.C.Y.; Leung, A.W.S.; et al. Hepatitis E Virus Species C Infection in Humans, Hong Kong. *Clin. Infect. Dis.* **2022**, *75*, 288–296. [CrossRef]

16. Andonov, A.; Robbins, M.; Borlang, J.; Cao, J.; Hatchette, T.; Stueck, A.; Deschambault, Y.; Murnaghan, K.; Varga, J.; Johnston, L. Rat Hepatitis E Virus Linked to Severe Acute Hepatitis in an Immunocompetent Patient. *J. Infect. Dis.* **2019**, *220*, 951–955. [CrossRef]

17. Rodriguez, C.; Marchand, S.; Sessa, A.; Cappy, P.; Pawlotsky, J.-M. Orthohepevirus C Hepatitis, an Underdiagnosed Disease? *J. Hepatol.* **2023**, *77*, S016882782300096X. [CrossRef]

18. Sridhar, S.; Situ, J.; Cai, J.-P.; Yip, C.C.-Y.; Wu, S.; Zhang, A.J.-X.; Wen, L.; Chew, N.F.-S.; Chan, W.-M.; Poon, R.W.-S.; et al. Multimodal Investigation of Rat Hepatitis E Virus Antigenicity: Implications for Infection, Diagnostics, and Vaccine Efficacy. *J. Hepatol.* **2021**, *74*, 1315–1324. [CrossRef]

19. Johne, R.; Heckel, G.; Plenge-Bönig, A.; Kindler, E.; Maresch, C.; Reetz, J.; Schielke, A.; Ulrich, R.G. Novel Hepatitis E Virus Genotype in Norway Rats, Germany. *Emerg. Infect. Dis.* **2010**, *16*, 1452–1455. [CrossRef]

20. Reuter, G.; Boros, Á.; Pankovics, P. Review of Hepatitis E Virus in Rats: Evident Risk of Species Orthohepevirus C to Human Zoonotic Infection and Disease. *Viruses* **2020**, *12*, 1148. [CrossRef]

21. Widén, F.; Ayral, F.; Artois, M.; Olofson, A.-S.; Lin, J. PCR Detection and Analysis of Potentially Zoonotic Hepatitis E Virus in French Rats. *Virol. J.* **2014**, *11*, 90. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. Ryll, R.; Bernstein, S.; Heuser, E.; Schlegel, M.; Dremsek, P.; Zumpe, M.; Wolf, S.; Pépin, M.; Bajomi, D.; Müller, G.; et al. Detection of Rat Hepatitis E Virus in Wild Norway Rats (*Rattus Norvegicus*) and Black Rats (Rattus rattus) from 11 European Countries. *Vet. Microbiol.* **2017**, *208*, 58–68. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23. Simanavicius, M.; Juskaite, K.; Verbickaite, A.; Jasiulionis, M.; Tamosiunas, P.L.; Petraityte-Burneikiene, R.; Zvirbliene, A.; Ulrich, R.G.; Kucinskaite-Kodze, I. Detection of Rat Hepatitis E Virus, but Not Human Pathogenic Hepatitis E Virus Genotype 1–4 Infections in Wild Rats from Lithuania. *Vet. Microbiol.* **2018**, *221*, 129–133. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Murphy, E.G.; Williams, N.J.; Jennings, D.; Chantrey, J.; Verin, R.; Grierson, S.; McElhinney, L.M.; Bennett, M. First Detection of Hepatitis E Virus (Orthohepevirus C) in Wild Brown Rats (*Rattus Norvegicus*) from Great Britain. *Zoonoses Public Health* **2019**, *66*, 686–694. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25. De Sabato, L.; Ianiro, G.; Monini, M.; De Lucia, A.; Ostanello, F.; Di Bartolo, I. Detection of Hepatitis E Virus RNA in Rats Caught in Pig Farms from Northern Italy. *Zoonoses Public Health* **2020**, *67*, 62–69. [CrossRef]

26. Niendorf, S.; Harms, D.; Hellendahl, K.F.; Heuser, E.; Böttcher, S.; Jacobsen, S.; Bock, C.-T.; Ulrich, R.G. Presence and Diversity of Different Enteric Viruses in Wild Norway Rats (*Rattus Norvegicus*). *Viruses* **2021**, *13*, 992. [CrossRef]

27. Kanai, Y.; Miyasaka, S.; Uyama, S.; Kawami, S.; Kato-Mori, Y.; Tsujikawa, M.; Yunoki, M.; Nishiyama, S.; Ikuta, K.; Hagiwara, K. Hepatitis E Virus in Norway Rats (*Rattus Norvegicus*) Captured around a Pig Farm. *BMC Res. Notes* **2012**, *5*, 4. [CrossRef]

28. Lack, J.B.; Volk, K.; Van Den Bussche, R.A. Hepatitis E Virus Genotype 3 in Wild Rats, United States. *Emerg. Infect. Dis.* **2012**, *18*, 1268. [CrossRef]

29. Prpić, J.; Keros, T.; Vucelja, M.; Bjedov, L.; Đaković Rode, O.; Margaletić, J.; Habrun, B.; Jemeršić, L. First Evidence of Hepatitis E Virus Infection in a Small Mammal (Yellow-Necked Mouse) from Croatia. *PLoS ONE* **2019**, *14*, e0225583. [CrossRef]
30. Cunha, L.; Luchs, A.; Azevedo, L.S.; Silva, V.C.M.; Lemos, M.F.; Costa, A.C.; Compri, A.P.; França, Y.; Viana, E.; Malta, F.; et al. Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Genotype 3 in Feces of Capybaras (Hydrochoeris Hydrochaeris) in Brazil. *Viruses* **2023**, *15*, 335. [CrossRef]

31. Pavio, N.; Kooh, P.; Cadavez, V.; Gonzales-Barron, U.; Thébault, A. Risk Factors for Sporadic Hepatitis E Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. *Microb. Risk Anal.* **2021**, *17*, 100129. [CrossRef]

32. Aniță, A.; Gorgan, L.; Aniță, D.; Oșlobanu, L.; Pavio, N.; Savuța, G. Evidence of Hepatitis E Infection in Swine and Humans in the East Region of Romania. *Int. J. Infect. Dis.* **2014**, *29*, 232–237. [CrossRef]

33. Porea, D.; Anita, A.; Demange, A.; Raileanu, C.; Oslobanu Ludu, L.; Anita, D.; Savuta, G.; Pavio, N. Molecular Detection of Hepatitis E Virus in Wild Boar Population in Eastern Romania. *Transbound. Emerg. Dis.* **2018**, *65*, 527–533. [CrossRef]

34. Porea, D.; Anita, A.; Vata, A.; Teodor, D.; Crivei, L.; Raileanu, C.; Gotu, V.; Ratoi, I.; Cozma, A.; Anita, D.; et al. Common European Origin of Hepatitis E Virus in Human Population From Eastern Romania. *Front. Public Health* **2020**, *8*, 578163. [CrossRef]

35. Jothikumar, N.; Cromeans, T.L.; Robertson, B.H.; Meng, X.J.; Hill, V.R. A Broadly Reactive One-Step Real-Time RT-PCR Assay for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Hepatitis E Virus. *J. Virol. Methods* **2006**, *131*, 65–71. [CrossRef]

36. Barnaud, E.; Rogée, S.; Garry, P.; Rose, N.; Pavio, N. Thermal Inactivation of Infectious Hepatitis E Virus in Experimentally Contaminated Food. *Appl. Env. Microbiol.* **2012**, *78*, 5153–5159. [CrossRef]

37. Cooper, K.; Huang, F.F.; Batista, L.; Rayo, C.D.; Bezanilla, J.C.; Toth, T.E.; Meng, X.J. Identification of Genotype 3 Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) in Serum and Fecal Samples from Pigs in Thailand and Mexico, Where Genotype 1 and 2 HEV Strains Are Prevalent in the Respective Human Populations. *J. Clin. Microbiol.* **2005**, *43*, 1684–1688. [CrossRef]

38. Bouquet, J.; Tesse, S.; Lunazzi, A.; Eloit, M.; Rose, N.; Nicand, E.; Pavio, N. Close Similarity between Sequences of Hepatitis E Virus Recovered from Humans and Swine, France, 2008–2009. *Emerg. Infect. Dis.* **2011**, *17*, 2018. [CrossRef]

39. Johne, R.; Plenge-Bonig, A.; Hess, M.; Ulrich, R.G.; Reetz, J.; Schielke, A. Detection of a Novel Hepatitis E-like Virus in Faeces of Wild Rats Using a Nested Broad-Spectrum RT-PCR. *J. Gen. Virol.* **2010**, *91*, 750–758. [CrossRef]

40. Pavio, N.; Laval, M.; Maestrini, O.; Casabianca, F.; Charrier, F.; Jori, F. Possible Foodborne Transmission of Hepatitis E Virus from Domestic Pigs and Wild Boars from Corsica. *Emerg. Infect. Dis.* **2016**, *22*, 2197–2199. [CrossRef]

41. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. *Mol. Biol. Evol.* **2016**, *33*, 1870–1874. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

42. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple Sequence Alignment with High Accuracy and High Throughput. *Nucleic Acids Res.* **2004**, *32*, 1792–1797. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

43. Tamura, K.; Nei, M. Estimation of the Number of Nucleotide Substitutions in the Control Region of Mitochondrial DNA in Humans and Chimpanzees. *Mol. Biol. Evol.* **1993**, *10*, 512–526. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

44. Li, W.; Guan, D.; Su, J.; Takeda, N.; Wakita, T.; Li, T.-C.; Ke, C.W. High Prevalence of Rat Hepatitis E Virus in Wild Rats in China. *Vet. Microbiol.* **2013**, *165*, 275–280. [CrossRef]

45. Parraud, D.; Lhomme, S.; Péron, J.M.; Da Silva, I.; Tavitian, S.; Kamar, N.; Izopet, J.; Abravanel, F. Rat Hepatitis E Virus: Presence in Humans in South-Western France? *Front. Med.* **2021**, *8*, 726363. [CrossRef]

46. Faber, M.; Wenzel, J.J.; Erl, M.; Stark, K.; Schemmerer, M. No Evidence for Orthohepevirus C in Archived Human Samples in Germany, 2000–2020. *Viruses* **2022**, *14*, 742. [CrossRef]

47. Johne, R.; Dremsek, P.; Kindler, E.; Schielke, A.; Plenge-Bönig, A.; Gregersen, H.; Wessels, U.; Schmidt, K.; Rietschel, W.; Groschup, M.H.; et al. Rat Hepatitis E Virus: Geographical Clustering within Germany and Serological Detection in Wild Norway Rats (*Rattus Norvegicus*). *Infect. Genet. Evol.* **2012**, *12*, 947–956. [CrossRef]

48. Mulyanto, Suparyatmo, J.B.; Andayani, I.G.A.S.; Khalid; Takahashi, M.; Ohnishi, H.; Jirintai, S.; Nagashima, S.; Nishizawa, T.; Okamoto, H. Marked Genomic Heterogeneity of Rat Hepatitis E Virus Strains in Indonesia Demonstrated on a Full-Length Genome Analysis. *Virus Res.* **2014**, *179*, 102–112. [CrossRef]

49. Wolf, S.; Reetz, J.; Johne, R.; Heiberg, A.-C.; Petri, S.; Kanig, H.; Ulrich, R.G. The Simultaneous Occurrence of Human Norovirus and Hepatitis E Virus in a Norway Rat (*Rattus Norvegicus*). *Arch. Virol.* **2013**, *158*, 1575–1578. [CrossRef]

50. Grierson, S.; Rabie, A.; Lambert, M.; Choudhury, B.; Smith, R.P. HEV Infection Not Evident in Rodents on English Pig Farms. *Vet. Rec.* **2018**, *182*, 81. [CrossRef]

51. Camp, J.V.; Desvars-Larrive, A.; Nowotny, N.; Walzer, C. Monitoring Urban Zoonotic Virus Activity: Are City Rats a Promising Surveillance Tool for Emerging Viruses? *Viruses* **2022**, *14*, 1516. [CrossRef]

52. Lhomme, S.; Top, S.; Bertagnoli, S.; Dubois, M.; Guerin, J.-L.; Izopet, J. Wildlife Reservoir for Hepatitis E Virus, Southwestern France. *Emerg. Infect. Dis.* **2015**, *21*, 1224–1226. [CrossRef]

**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.