# Characterization of strictly lytic phages infecting Oenococcus oeni from Merlot wines and proposal of a new genus

Yasma Barchi, Florencia Oviedo-Hernandez, Amel Chaïb, Cécile Philippe, Olivier Claisse, Christian Cambillau, Adeline Goulet, Claire Le Marrec

► To cite this version:

Yasma Barchi, Florencia Oviedo-Hernandez, Amel Chaïb, Cécile Philippe, Olivier Claisse, et al. Characterization of strictly lytic phages infecting Oenococcus oeni from Merlot wines and proposal of a new genus. Microbiology Spectrum, 2025, 13, 10.1128/spectrum.02588-24. hal-05382417

HAL Id: hal-05382417

https://hal.science/hal-05382417v1

Submitted on 25 Nov 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Characterization of strictly lytic phages infecting *Oenococcus oeni* from Merlot wines and proposal of a new genus

Yasma Barchi,¹ Florencia Oviedo-Hernandez,¹ Amel Chaïb,¹ Cécile Philippe,¹ Olivier Claisse,¹ Christian Cambillau,²,³ Adeline Goulet,³ Claire Le Marrec¹

**AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS** See affiliation list on p. 15.

**ABSTRACT** *Oenococcus oeni* is the predominant lactic acid bacteria species in wine, where it performs the malolactic fermentation, which helps to secure and preserve wine quality. Here, we describe the morphological, biological, and genomic characterization of siphophage Krappator X27, a strictly lytic phage that was previously isolated from Merlot wines. Several aspects of the life cycle of the phage were investigated using the sensitive strain IOEBS277 under optimal growth conditions. X27 has a large burst size (149 Plaque Forming unit [PFU] per infected cell) and targets industrially relevant strains of *O. oeni* used for production of wines. X27 also shows lytic activity against its host in red and white grape juice media. The phage genome consists of 41,633 nucleotides. Structure prediction of the viral adhesion devices reveals elongated multi-domain machinery containing carbohydrate-binding modules likely involved in host recognition and binding. Genome-based phylogeny revealed that X27 has less than 30% intergenomic similarities with its most similar phages and represents a new species in a yet unassigned genus, for which we propose the name « Krappavirus ». Aiming to expand the available collection of genomes in this genus, we sequenced two independently isolated phage homologs from Merlot wines. Modular protein evolution may play a role in the diversification of this specific phage lineage, and naturally occurring domain combinations were found in three crucial proteins of known function: the small terminase subunit, the endolysin, and the replisome organizer.

**IMPORTANCE** *Oenococcus oeni* is commonly used for wine and cider production. Characterizing strictly lytic oenophages, understanding their genetic relationships, and studying their interactions with various hosts are the necessary steps for preventing and controlling phage attacks that occur along the fermentation process.

**KEYWORDS** lytic phage, *Oenococcus*, winemaking, malolactic fermentation, Alpha-Fold2, host adhesion device, domain shuffling

Wines are among the most iconic fermented products worldwide. The conversion of grape juice to wine relies on yeasts and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) that conduct the alcoholic fermentation (AF) and the malolactic fermentation (MLF), respectively (1, 2). The ecology of wine fermentations at the scale of wineries has revealed a large diversity of microorganisms including various yeasts, bacteria, and fungi. Further exploration has then expanded to the whole vineyard, which represents the initial environment affecting the microbial makeup found in wine fermentation. Acquisition of such data is essential to preserve and improve wine quality, anticipate climate change, and assist winemakers during the transition toward more sustainable practice, such as the reduction of sulfites and implementation of biocontrol strategies.

In recent years, multi-omic tools have become increasingly important to better understand the function and resilience of vine-wine ecosystems. High-throughput

**Editor** Nicolas Soler, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France

Address correspondence to Claire Le Marrec, clehenaff@enscbp.fr.

Yasma Barchi and Florencia Oviedo-Hernandez contributed equally to this article. Author order was determined alphabetically.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

See the funding table on p. 15.

Received 19 March 2025

Accepted 8 June 2025

Published 12 August 2025

Copyright © 2025 Barchi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
analyses have recently questioned how geography, climate, soil properties, and winemaking practices may impact and shape microbial communities (3). A comprehensive understanding of the vine-wine microbial ecosystem also requires the consideration of the virosphere. Viruses infecting bacteria, namely bacteriophages or phages, have so far drawn a great deal of attention during the winemaking steps. Phages are widespread in must (crushed grapes) and wines where they infect spoiling bacteria, such as acetic acid bacteria (4), as well as the beneficial LAB *Oenococcus oeni* that drives MLF (5). An increasing amount of data on the diversity and abundance of *O. oeni*-infecting phages (oenophages) is becoming available. Oenococcal strains of commercial or indigenous origin are described as typically harboring a number of active prophages in their chromosomes (6, 7). The prevalence of lysogeny that was observed during *in silico* exploration of sequenced genomes was further corroborated during *in vivo* studies of the dynamics of the population upon completion of spontaneous MLF. Prophage carriage in *O. oeni* may therefore impart both positive and negative attributes in this specific industrial context (5).

The viral population associated with winemaking also consists of ex-temperate phages such as OE33PA, and strictly lytic phages of the Vinitor lineage (6, 8, 9). The latter phages are particularly abundant in musts and may therefore participate in the selection of strains responsible for MLF during the early steps of winemaking.

Comparative genomics of over 250 fully sequenced viral genomes shows that oenophages can be divided into two groups of closely related genomes referred to as clusters, which can be further divided into subclusters (6). The cluster I phages are exclusively temperate, or ex-temperate, while cluster II contains both temperate (Int~D~ group, recently assigned to the genus *Sozzivirus* by International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses [ICTV]) and strictly lytic (Vinitor) oenophages. Interestingly, Vinitor phages exhibit a unique evolutionary trajectory, and their gene repertoire contains sequences related to epiphytic and/or insect-associated LAB (8–10).

The observed modular and combinatorial nature of oenophage genomes was exploited to develop a PCR typing system for rapid assessment of diversity among oeno-phages (6, 8, 9, 11). It was used to screen the novelty and diversity of a collection of previous phage isolates, stored year after year (11). We observed that the genome of Krappator X~27~ (hereafter "X~27~") did not amplify the conserved regions along currently described oenophages, suggesting that X~27~ may represent another lineage of oenophages (11). Here, we report the morphological, biological, and genomic characterization of this strictly lytic oenophage isolated from a Merlot wine. Using a PCR specific for the *tmp* gene of X~27~, we identified two additional phage homologs in wines made from the same grape variety. The three described Krappator phages represent two species in a yet unassigned genus, for which we propose the name «Krappavirus». Altogether, genomic comparisons also suggest that the isolated oenophages are able to shuffle fragments of three key proteins, which may facilitate adaptation to their hosts.

## RESULTS

### Physiological characteristics and morphology of Krappator X~27~

Phage X~27~ was isolated from a Merlot red wine collected in 2015 in France (8). It was easy to propagate, and infections at multiplicity of infection (MOI) >10~⁻⁶~ caused complete lysis of strain IOEBS277 in MRS~φ~ (MRS agar supplemented with MgSO4 (3.75 g/l) and CaCl2 (2.375 g/l)) broth at 25°C, following 72 h incubation. The phage produced maximum titer (2 × 10~¹⁰~ PFU/mL) for MOIs ranging from 2.5 × 10~⁻⁴~ to 10~⁻³~ (Fig. S1). Lysates could be stored at 4°C for extended periods of time with a 2-log reduction in phage titer (8.75 × 10~⁹~ to 6.25 × 10~⁷~ PFU/mL) within 16 months.

X~27~ produced large and clear plaques on the lawns of its host (Fig. 1A), which were easily distinguishable from those produced by the strictly lytic Vinitor oenophages (Fig. 1B). A distinctive turbid halo zone around plaques was observed for X~27~, whose width incrementally increased over time. This has previously been described as an indicator of phage-associated exopolysaccharide depolymerization (12).
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 1** Titrations of lysates of the X₂₇ (A) and Vinitor 162 (B) phages on *O. oeni* IOEBS277. Image B is adapted with permission from reference (9). Volumes of 8 µL of the pure (P) and serial dilutions were spotted on the lawns of the host strain.</figcaption></figure>

Host adsorption and one-step growth curve tests were performed in MRS<sub>φ</sub> broth. An 85% host adsorption efficiency was reached in 60 min at 25°C. The latent period was 3 h, and newly synthesized particles were released after an additional burst period of 2 h. The burst size was 149 ± 4 PFU/infected cell (Fig. S2).

Phage infection was also efficient in other liquid media supporting the growth of *O. oeni*, such as Medium for Leuconostoc oenos (MLO) and modified MRS with ribose replacing dextrose (Fig. 2A and B). Ribose is one of the major residual sugars in wine after completion of AF. In contrast, infection was less efficient in Red Grape Juice liquid medium and was barely observed in White Grape Juice broth (Fig. 2C and D).

A host range test was carried out for a panel of 20 *O. oeni* strains representing the four main phylogenetic groups described in the species (Table 1). Half of the tested bacterial strains were susceptible to X₂₇. These sensitive strains belonged to three phylogroups (A, C, D) and were associated with wine, cider, and kombucha. Efficiencies of plaquing (EOP) and/or plaque sizes were reduced on six sensitive strains, suggesting the presence of active phage resistance mechanisms. Previous *in silico* studies showed that genes coding for restriction-modification and Sie systems are widespread in *O. oeni*, while the species completely lacks CRISPR-Cas systems (6, 11). Conversely, X₂₇ did not form any plaques on 10 strains, including all four tested strains from phylogroup B. In this small set, LAD2 was remarkable as its infection by X₂₇ at high MOI produced a clear lysis zone in the first two dilution spots, with no individual plaques, nor any sign of lytic activity in further dilution spots. The lysis zone still occurred when spotting the same PFU of a dialyzed lysate and was not dependent on phage lysate-contaminating lysins or bacteriocins. Bacterial killing may have therefore occurred by phage binding that does not lead to a productive infection. The exposure of LAD2 to high-multiplicity virion adsorption with lytic action of phage structural proteins may degrade the peptidoglycan at multiple sites, leading to "lysis from without" (12, 13). Alternately, LAD2 may have another specific abortive mechanism as compared to the other resistant strains.

Testing strains of the *O. sicerae*, *O. kitaharae*, and *O. alcoholitolerans* species showed no plaques, suggesting that X₂₇ was not capable of cross-taxonomic order infectivity (Table 1).

## Genome characterization of X₂₇

The X₂₇ genome consists of 41,633 bp with a GC content of 36.8%. It carries 72 putative open reading frames (ORFs), which are all positioned on the same DNA strand, except ORF72 (Fig. 3). All genes, except for ORF1, use an ATG start codon. The identified ORFs code for proteins that range between 30 and 1,619 amino acids (aa) in size. Putative functions were assigned to 30 ORFs (41.7%) using BLASTp National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Prokaryotic Virus Remote Homologous Groups (PHROG), and
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 2** Impact of medium composition on the infection of strain IOEBS277 by $X_{27}$ at an MOI of 0.003. Growth curves of the control and infected cultures in MLO (A), MRS Ribose (B), Red Grape Juice (RGJ) (C) and White Grape Juice (WGJ) broth (D). Time zero represents the time of phage addition.</figcaption></figure>

HHpred (Table S1). No gene coding for an integrase, excisionase, or repressor gene could be identified, confirming that the $X_{27}$ life cycle is strictly lytic.

The genome is organized into five functional modules (I–V) similar to those described for other oenophages known to date (5). Following annotation convention, the genome starts with DNA packaging genes (ORF1–ORF2) encoding the small and large subunits (TerS and TerL) of a terminase complex (Fig. 3). The packaging module also contains the gene coding for the portal protein. $Ter_{S_{X_{27}}}$ shares 71%–72% sequence identity with corresponding proteins found in *Sozzivirus* and *IntE* oenophages (6). An HHpred analysis

<table><caption>**TABLE 1** $X_{27}$ phage production on different *O. oeni* strains as represented by EOP values</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Tested strains and origin</th><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="3">Phage production<sup>a</sup> on relevant strains<sup>b</sup></th></tr><tr><th>High<br>10<sup>-1</sup> &lt; eop &lt; 1</th><th>Medium<br>10<sup>-7</sup> &lt; eop &lt; 10<sup>-1</sup></th><th>None eop &lt; 10<sup>-8</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2">O. oeni</td><td>Wine</td><td>PSU-1, IOEB1491,<br>LAA4 (A)</td><td>IOEB0608, LAB6,<br>IOEBS25, LAB2013 (A)</td><td>IOEBCiNe, S28, VF,<br>LAD2, CI4 (A);<br>IOEBB10, IOEB9805,<br>IOEB8413 (B)</td></tr><tr><td>Cider</td><td>CRBO1381 (C)</td><td>C52 (C)</td><td>C23 (B) ; CRBO1384 (C)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Kombucha</td><td></td><td>BL4 (D)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Oenococcus<br>sicerae</td><td>Cider</td><td></td><td></td><td>UCMA15228</td></tr><tr><td>Oenococcus<br>kitaharae</td><td>Shochu</td><td></td><td></td><td>NRIC0647</td></tr><tr><td>Oenococcus<br>alcoholitolerans</td><td>Water kefir</td><td></td><td></td><td>CRBO2176</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Cachaça</td><td></td><td></td><td>JP736 ; JP72/2</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote><sup>a</sup>High EOP values represent sensitive strains and medium EOP values suggest the presence of bacterial resistance mechanisms. EOP values less than 10<sup>-8</sup> indicate that the tested strains are fully resistant to $X_{27}$.</footnote>

<footnote><sup>b</sup>Phylogroup membership (A to D) in the *O. oeni* species is given in brackets.</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>FIG 3 The genome comparison of X27 and X149 was performed and visualized with Clinker (14). The first base of small terminase subunit (terS) genes was selected as the starting point of the genomes. The functional gene groups (modules I to V) are indicated in different colors. Genes in gray have an identity level below 90%. The three ORFs encoding shuffled proteins are indicated with an asterisk.</figcaption></figure>

identified domains similar to the DNA-binding domain of TerS from *pac* packager phages, such as Sf6 infecting *Shigella flexneri* (Prob.: 99.31%, E-value: 6e-11) (15). The TerLX27 protein is also most similar to that of well-studied phages with known *pac* DNA packaging strategies, such as PBSX-like phages in *Lactococcus lactis* and *Enterococcus raffinolactis* and the *Lactiplantibacillus plantarum* Silenus phage (16) (Fig. S3). The X27 genome is therefore suggested to have circularly permuted termini. Headful-packaging phage *pac* sites usually lie within or near the small terminase subunit gene, and packaging proceeds in the direction in which that gene is transcribed.

The morphogenesis module II consists of 23 genes. The head morphogenesis genes with the predicted functions include minor capsid protein (X27 gp5), major head proteins (X27 gp10 and X27 gp11), head scaffolding protein (X27 gp9), putative maturation head protease (X27 gp4), head-tail adaptor (X27 gp12), and head-closure-knob protein (X27 gp13) (Fig. 3). The module also includes three orphan genes (ORF6-8). Yet, the corresponding 650 bp-nucleotide region is also predicted to contain four putative Rho-independent terminators, interspaced by 55-72 bp sequences, resembling small non-coding RNAs produced by lytic phages to regulate various viral processes (17).

A group of 10 genes (ORF12-21) forms the tail morphogenesis module. Functionally assigned tail genes include putative tail completion proteins (X27 gp14, X27 gp15), major tail protein (MTP, X27 gp16), tail assembly chaperone (X27 gp17), tape measure protein (TMP, X27 gp19), distal tail protein (Dit, X27 gp20), and tail-associated lysozyme (Tal, X27 gp21) (Fig. 3). Of note, the TMP comprises a small domain (122 aa) similar to a transglycosylase-like domain found in phage tail fibers (Cd13402; Prob.: 99.16%, E-value: 6.2e - 10) that catalyzes cleavage of the β-1,4-glycosidic bond between the peptidoglycan N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine moieties, as does egg-white lysozyme. All phage morphogenesis proteins were largely aligned with their orthologs from IntD temperate oenophages and prophages of the LAB *Liquorilactobacillus satsumensis*, which are associated with fermented beverages such as shochu, kombuchas, and kefirs (18, 19).

Module III is the lysis module and contains ORF28 coding for an endolysin (LysX27). We found no signal peptide involved in its secretion, unlike the well-known fog44 lysin (20). LysX27 has a modular structure comprising an N-terminal enzymatically active domain (EAD) that belongs to the glycoside hydrolase 25 (GH25) family and is suggested to hydrolyze the β-1,4-glycosidic linkage in bacterial cell walls (Fig. 3). A similar domain is found in orphan lysozyme-related protein sequences in a variety of *O. oeni* and *Weissella* sp. strains, as well as in prophages associated with human metagenomes (55%-57% identity) (21, 22). The predicted C-terminal cell wall-binding domain used for peptidoglycan recognition (22) had 87.8% identity to the endolysins from the Vinitor oenophages. We found fewer homologs for the EAD section in databanks, and bioinformatic analysis was unable to identify a functional domain.
Lysis systems in gram-positive hosts require a holin, which allows the endolysin to access the host cell wall. With few exceptions (23), holin-encoding genes overlap or are adjacent to lysin-encoding genes. Intriguingly, BLAST analyses of genes upstream and downstream of ORF28 did not retrieve any holin-like protein orthologs, and globally, the deduced proteins aligned poorly with existing phage records. Holins are small proteins containing one, two, or three transmembrane domains/helices (16, 21) and a charged C-terminal region. TMHMM search predicted the putative protein of ORF27 (111 amino acids) as the most likely candidate. It would correspond to a type III holin structure with a single transmembrane region, an N-terminal region located in the periplasm, and a C-terminus located in the cytoplasm.

Module IV contains genes associated with the replication of the phage genome, including a putative replication-repair nuclease (ORF29), a replisome organizer (ORF36), two HNH endonucleases (ORF35, ORF41), and a single-strand annealing protein (SSAP) of the RecT/Redβ family (ORF30). The latter is related to an SSAP harbored by an IntF prophage associated with a strain collected from kombucha (6) (46% identity, E-value: 8e − 71). The Best BLAST Hit (BBH) outside of *O. oeni* is to a RecT protein of *Lc. lactis* with 44% identity (WP_259749449.1) (Fig. 3). Phage SSAPs can be involved in different aspects of DNA metabolism throughout phage propagation (24, 25) and also substitute the classical bacterial recombinase RecA to allow recombination between dissimilar sequences. Hence, SSAPs are thought to facilitate genetic transfers between distant phages and play an important role in the extensive genome modularity and mosaicism of their genomes (24–27). As observed in *Bacillales* and *Lactobacillales* phages, two specific functions encoded in direct proximity to the phage-encoded *recT/redβ* genes include a Cas4-like nuclease with a PD-(D/E)-XK domain (ORF32) and a single-strand binding protein (ORF33) (24).

No clear delineation could be identified between module IV and the rest of the genome. Therefore, we arbitrarily grouped the right-end genes (ORF56-72) together into module V (Fig. 3). Overall, no functions could be assigned to most proteins using either HHpred or PFAM analyses. Only a conserved domain of ArpU-like transcriptional regulators was found in the gp70 protein. The deduced proteins from ORF47 and ORF55 resemble HNH homing endonucleases, which are often selfish genetic elements that exist free-standing or associated with inteins or introns (28). BBH was the putative NUMOD4 domain-containing protein of *Paenibacillus mucilaginosus* (E-value: 5e − 18; 48% identity; locus tag B2K_02705) and the HNH endonuclease of the *L. plantarum* phage Satyr (E-value: 4e − 84; 68% identity; locus tag: HOS71_gp029). We joined the two ORFs framing each HNH homing endonuclease and performed a BLASTn analysis. None of the resulting hits spanned along the joint region, suggesting that no gene was spliced by these HNH endonucleases.

## The X₂₇ host adhesion device is a long fiber-like, multi-domain assembly

Transmission electron microscopy images revealed a preclassification of phage X₂₇ into the class of *Caudoviricetes* (29), characterized by an icosahedral capsid of 57.5 ± 0.5 nm in diameter attached to a flexible tail of 246 ± 4 nm in length (Fig. 4). This is the most widespread taxonomic classification among currently characterized LAB phages, bearing in mind that most of them are of dairy origin (30). At the tail distal end, the thin and elongated host adhesion device, involved in the specific binding of yet unidentified receptors in the host cell wall, was overall similar to that of Vinitor 162 (9).

In order to gain further insights into the host adhesion devices of X₂₇, we used AlphaFold2 (AF2), which is well adapted for structural analyses of elongated and flexible assemblies (31–36). AF2 predicted the structure of a hexamer of Dit and a trimer of Tal (Fig. 5). The hexamer represents the common core of siphophage host adhesion devices which interacts on one side with the last ring of MTP proteins and, on the other side, with a trimer of Tal (31). A search for structural homologs in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) using the Dali server revealed that the short Dit (121 aa) of X₂₇ is devoid of carbohydrate-binding motif (CBM) and composed of a single domain, like the Dit of the *Escherichia coli*
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 4** Visualization of phage X$_{27}$ by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The white arrows show a terminal tail fiber.</figcaption></figure>

siphophage Lambda (Table S2), referred to as the belt domain, because of its canonical belt loop assembling the hexameric ring (35–40) (Fig. 5; Fig. S4 and S5).

The long Tal of X$_{27}$ (1,914 aa) comprises a bulky N-terminal domain followed by a C-terminal extension (Fig. 5), which is in agreement with the fiber-like structure observed at the tail distal end (Fig. 4). Its N-terminal domain (1–340) is the typical structural domain of Tal proteins, which was first described in the baseplate hub protein gp27 of the myophage T4 (41), assembling host adhesion devices as well as phage tail-related bacterial contractile injection systems (Table S2) (42). Then, the Tal extension consists of a long α-helical rod (aa 421–1,225) containing three CBMs (Fig. 5; Table S2) likely involved in the recognition of O. oeni cell wall polysaccharides (CWPs). Lastly, the Tal extension ends with two similar regions (aa 1274–1,553 and 1,565–1,914). Each of them is made up of triple β-helices, β-prisms, and an intramolecular chaperone-like domain (Fig. 5; Table S2). This organization is commonly found in phage tail spike and fiber proteins (43–45). Of note, while tail-associated chaperones possess long β-hairpins contacting the upstream β-prism (44, 45), the X$_{27}$ chaperones, like that of Vinitor 162, are devoid of such tentacles and are structurally closer to the corresponding domain of the eukaryotic MyRF factor (Fig. 5; Fig. S6) (46). These intramolecular chaperones mediate the trimerization and proper folding of their upstream domains and are then auto-proteolytically released to leave mature proteins (45, 46). Serine-lysine catalytic dyads, which are indispensable for their self-cleavage (45, 46), are present in each X$_{27}$ intramolecular chaperone-like domain (Fig. S6). However, the presence of two consecutive intramolecular chaperones in the X$_{27}$ host adhesion device raises questions about their roles in the assembly and function of the Tal.

X$_{27}$ is the prototype of a new genus provisionally named "Krappavirus"

The genome sequences of X₂₇ and related phages (8 known oenophages and 48 other LAB phages) were analyzed using the Virus Classification and Tree Building Online Resource (VICTOR) (47). The analysis positioned X₂₇ in *Oenococcus* phage cluster II. Yet, the unclassified branch represented by X₂₇ was distant from that of the Vinitor phages, the first group of lytic phages characterized to date (9). Both groups exist as two evolutionary lineages which were assigned to subclusters II.2 and II.1, respectively (Fig. 6A). We took a closer look at genome diversity within subcluster II.2 (Fig. 6B). The genome of X₂₇ was most closely related to those of temperate phages of the Sozzivirus genus, as well as a prophage from *O. sicerae*. Worth mentioning was the observed
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 5** AF2 predicted structures of the X27 Dit and Tal proteins. The hexameric ring of Dit is shown as salmon ribbons and transparent surfaces. One Dit monomer is shown as a rainbow ribbon side by side with the crystal structure of the phage Lambda Dit protein (gray ribbon, PDB 8xcg). The trimer of Tal is shown as ribbons and transparent surfaces. A monomer of the Tal N-terminal domain and of every CBM are shown as rainbow ribbons side by side with their closest structural homologs identified by the Dali server (PDB ID 3cdd for the Tal of phage MuSo2, PDB ID 2zew for CBM16). The Tal C-terminal β-helices, β-prism, and intramolecular chaperone are shown as trimeric assemblies. Similar assemblies from the phage PhiKZ (PDB ID 6orj) and the eukaryotic MyRF (PDB ID 7dc3) are shown for comparison.</figcaption></figure>

conservation of the packaging module among members (Fig. 3). Phages within subcluster II.2 were not restricted to a single genus, and the VICTOR tool suggested that X27 represents a novel viral genus by itself. The taxonomic relationships of the X27 and Sozzivirus 9805 to each other were also determined by uploading the genomes to Virus Intergenomic Distance Calculator (VIRIDIC) (48). VIRIDIC aligns similar genomes and identifies genus relationships at ≥70% similarity and species at ≥95%. The X27 genome
displayed 23.6% intergenomic similarity with that of Sozzivirus 9805 (Fig. 6B). Based on the above, we propose that X27 defines a representative species of an unassigned genus of siphophages, which we provisionally named "Krappavirus" (Krappa, for grapes in "francique," an Old Frankish language) (49).

The X27 genome sequence was used to design specific primers to examine uncharacterized oenophages collected during previous surveys and stored inside infected cells at -80°C (5, 8). The strategy led to the sequencing of two independently isolated homologs, namely X28 and X149 phages. Like X27, they came from Merlot red wines. Altogether, the three phages were obtained from distinct fermentation steps (must, AF, and MLF for X27, X28, and X149, respectively) and during two consecutive millesimes (2014 for X149 and 2015 for X27 and X28). The X27 and X28 genomes shared 99.9% sequence identity at the nucleotide level, as tested reciprocally, and contained the same number of predicted ORFs. X27 and X28 therefore corresponded to variants of the same phage species. In contrast, the genome of X149 was slightly larger with 42,545 bp and had 80 predicted ORFs. Although both genomes showed near-complete collinearity, some dissimilarities mapped to two genomic segments (Fig. 3). Importantly, both VICTOR and VIRIDIC classified X27 and X149 as separate species (intergenomic identity 85.8%) (Fig. 6).

The most variable region between both phages was module V, and an apparent gain of certain ORFs was evident in the X149 genome. They included ORF64X149 coding for an adenine-specific methyltransferase, with identified orthologs in the genomes of various human metagenome-associated phages (22), lactophages (50), as well as uncharacterized prophages of Fructilactobacilli. Automated annotation also identified four additional small ORFs (17-20) in X149 in module II that are potentially involved in the connection of the phage head and tail (Fig. 3). Although both Dit proteins were 100% identical, Tal components shared 96% identity (Fig. S5). Amino acid changes are distributed in the whole sequence, especially in the region spanning the potential saccharide-binding

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 6** Krappator phages X27 and X149 correspond to two species of a novel genus. (A) Phylogenetic tree generated by VICTOR using the complete genome sequences of phages infecting LAB genera including X27 and X149 and eight other phages of *O. oeni* from clusters I and II; (B) heatmap integrating the intergenomic similarity values between oenophages X27, X149, OE33PA, 9805, and the *L. plantarum* silenusvirus silenus phage, calculated with VIRIDIC. Current nomenclature of phages by ICTV is used. Accession numbers are as reported previously (9).</figcaption></figure>
pocket of the first CBM (Fig. S5). The host range of X₁₄₉ was checked, and changes in the
Tal protein were not sufficient to fully explain the slightly expanded host range of X₁₄₉.

Protein modularity in Krappator phages

Another differentiating factor between X27 and X149 was the presence of three deduced
multi-domain proteins with similar predicted functions (TerS, Lys, and Replisome
organizer) yet high modularity, suggesting the shuffling of protein modules (Fig. 3).
The similarity was most pronounced in the C-terminal parts of the proteins, whereas
the N-termini had diverged considerably between both Krappator phage genomes. We
first observed divergence among the TerS proteins (Fig. S7). Owing to literature, the
N-terminus and central sections of TerS are suggested to be responsible for binding
properties to DNA and oligomerization mechanisms, respectively. We observed that
TerS<sub>X149</sub> was shorter than TerS<sub>X27</sub> and shared identity to TerS from phages of LAB,
including the Lactobacillus phage Phig1e (51). Yet, X27 and X149 phages had the
same combinations of TerS C-terminal section and TerL protein types, suggesting their
importance for the interaction between both subunits as proposed in other model
phages (52). Whether and how the presence of divergent sequences impacts encapsida-
tion remains to be established.

The second protein with apparent shuffling was the endolysin. Even though the
EAD regions in LysX27 (211 aa) and LysX149 (216 aa) corresponded to GH25-like N-acetyl-
β-D-muramidase domains, they belonged to distinct subfamilies (Conserved Domains
Database [CDD] 06,417, GH25_lysA and CDD 06415, GH25_Cpl1, respectively), support-
ing the idea that both endolysins are natural chimeras. Interestingly, we examined
phenotypic differences in phage replication parameters and found that cell lysis upon
infection of strain IOEBS277 by X149 was 24–48 h delayed compared to infection by X27
and X28.

Further evidence of modular shuffling was provided by the comparisons of the
replisome organizers specified by X₂₇ (ORF36) and X₁₄₉ (ORF44). Both proteins shared a
C-terminal DnaD domain with 45% identity to a hypothetical protein in the P335-type
phage 6890 of *Lc. lactis* (locus tag D6890_040). Yet, the BBH of the N-terminal frag-
ments of 148 aa corresponded to replication proteins associated with prophages in *Liq.
satsumensis* (locus tag KBX31_11260) and *Weissella oryzae* (locus tag WOSG25_210040),
respectively. The 5´AATGAC3´ sequence was repeated four times, resulting in the
presence of a NDNDNDNDND possible linker between essential domains.

DISCUSSION

While the biodiversity of LAB and their phages that thrive in dairy fermentations has
been extensively explored over the last years (53), limited research has been conduc-
ted in plant-based fermented fruit and vegetable environments. The present work
contributes to expanding the current knowledge about the biodiversity of phages
infecting *O. oeni* during winemaking, through the characterization of the strictly lytic
phage Krappator X27. Like all oenophages characterized to date, X27 has a siphophage
morphotype. Its particularity lies in its high burst size (149 PFU/cell), as compared to
the values measured in other oenophages in the same medium: 16–20 for P58I, 25 for
Φ1002, 45 for OE33PA, and 55 for S1.1S (5). Of note, X27 is also able to lyse its host
in grape juice. Furthermore, analysis of the samples from which the phage and its two
counterparts X28 and X149 were isolated reveals that these lytic phages are present
at every stage in the transformation of grapes into wine (must, AF, and MLF). Based
on these observations, we carefully raise the possibility that Krappator phages may
influence the overall microbial community composition and have adverse impacts on
MLF kinetics and product quality.

Intriguingly, the three characterized Krappator phages were isolated from wines
fermented from Merlot grapes, one of the main red grape varieties used in Bordeaux,
which is also common in wine production in other parts of the world. Yet, no clear link
between phage phylogeny and sample source, in terms of grape variety, was observed in
previous studies. For example, Vinitor 162 and Vinitor 27 were obtained from two distinct varieties (9). The potential impact of the grape variety also lies in the fact that varieties are differentiated by the white or red character of the grapes. Solid evidence confirms that grape variety affects the concentration of total polyphenolic compounds (PCs) and their chemical diversity. Other important factors include grape maturity, environmental and agro-ecological conditions in vineyards, and winemaking technology. In our study, the characterization of X27 showed that red grape juice was more permissive to phage infection than white grape juice, regardless of the pH of the media. The concentration of total PCs is on average higher in the red varieties. Yet, interpreting our data remains a tricky task since (i) PCs have a complexity of effects in the cell and are notably responsible for dose-dependent alterations of microbial membranes, and (ii) musts/wines have a heterogeneous array of molecules, whose biological activities on cell growth and phage infectivity can be synergistic or antagonistic. Among wine PCs, research by Philippe et al. (54) has shown that some flavonoids prevent oenophage OE33PA from binding to its host and/or interfere with subsequent steps of the lytic cycle. In the first suggested hypothesis, flavonoids could interact with the phage adsorption device and occupy the receptor-binding sites, thereby blocking phage-host recognition. Alternately, the compounds may limit the synthesis and/or the access to CWPs (53, 54). A notable example is the impact of propolis on various LAB of the oral cavity. This bee product, enriched with a variety of flavonoids and phenolic acids, can inhibit the synthesis of the bacterial cell wall and reduce the expression and activity of various glycosyltransferases (55). Noteworthy, these enzymes play a pivotal role in assembling LAB CWPs of various composition and architecture, including cell wall teichoic acids, lipoteichoic acids, and CWPs which are embedded in the peptidoglycan layer (53). Rhamnose-containing CWPs have been associated with bacteriophage receptors for ovococcal LAB genera, including streptococci, enterococci, and lactococci (56). The O. oeni species has the potential to synthesize three types of homopolysaccharides (dextran, levan, β-glucan) as well as two heteropolysaccharides (57). Future work should now aim to determine the composition of the polymers, isolate bacterial insensitive mutants of O. oeni, and experimentally test the function of the potential host-binding domains identified in our AF2 structural model of the X27 host adhesion device. Like for many other LAB phages (10, 34, 58), this protein assembly contains a combination of CBMs likely functioning as receptor-binding domains. Moreover, the X27 Tal β-prisms could also be receptor-binding sites at their grooves that expose aromatic residues usually involved in interactions with polysaccharides. Noteworthy, in the L-shaped fibers of the siphophage T5, the cleavage of the intramolecular chaperone, which contains long β-hairpins interacting with upstream β-prims, exposes potential receptor-binding sites for the recognition of oligo-mannose units of the E. coli Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (44). Although we could identify potential intramolecular chaperones' catalytic dyads in X27, it remains to be determined whether self-cleavage occurs in viral particles, and, if so, what the structural trigger is. Since X27 harbors two consecutive β-prism-intramolecular chaperone motifs, both intramolecular chaperones, or at least the one of the first motif, could remain in infectious virions, thereby adding two additional potential receptor-binding sites to the CBM combination. The presence of β-prism-intramolecular chaperone motifs in the long Tals of the oenophages X27 and Vinitor 162 further highlights the modularity and structural diversity of LAB phages' host adhesion devices (10, 34, 58, 59) evolved to ensure success in host detection in their ecological niches.

To date, very few active oenophages have been thoroughly characterized. Their analyses identified clear taxonomic boundaries and split them into two separate lineages of cos- and pac-type phages, named clusters 1 and 2, respectively (6, 11). Yet, key findings from our study reveal substantial novelty and lead us to propose the existence of a potentially novel genus of oenophages called "Krappavirus" within subcluster II. At the protein level, the similarity between virulent and temperate members of the proposed « Krappavirus » and Sozzivirus genera, respectively, extends essentially over the entire morphogenesis module of the phage genomes and may trace ancient gene
flux (26). In contrast, Vinitor phages (subcluster II.1) are more distantly related and may be classified apart under a distinct and higher taxonomic rank (5, 6, 9), such as the temperate oenophages in cluster I.

Understanding the evolutionary history of Krappator phages is complicated, and ancient exchanges may have occurred between phages during co-infections, between prophages in the genome, or between prophages and infecting temperate phages. It is necessary to continue the work in order to determine whether the phage-encoded recombinases conserved among Krappator phages are involved in recombination events at specific sites between genomes (60). An interesting finding is that Krappator phages evolve by shuffling interchangeable functional modules in specific proteins. In agreement with recent data (61, 62), the domain-based protein modularity was observed in the endolysin, the replisome organizer, and the small terminase unit. Shuffling, therefore, appears to be an evolutionary strategy among Krappator phages to allow rapid adaptation to available hosts in their environment and to ensure their continued success.

# MATERIALS AND METHODS

## Bacterial strains and growth conditions

We used 20 strains of *O. oeni* originating from different beverages (wine, cider, kombucha, and water kefir). The *O. sicerae* strain was isolated from cider. We also included two strains of *O. kitaharae* previously obtained from Shochu, a traditional Japanese liquor (63), and from water kefir (64). Both *O. alcoholitolerans* strains (JP736 and 72/2) were provided by Prof. De Morais (Federal University Pernambuco, Brazil). All bacterial strains were obtained from the Centre de Ressources Biologiques Oenologiques (CRB Oeno, ISVV, Villenave d'Ornon, France).

Strains were routinely grown in MRS medium (Difco) at 25°C. Alternately, grape juice-containing media were used. Red Grape Juice medium contains 25% (vol/vol) of commercial red grape juice (Reflets de France, Carrefour, Bordeaux, France), 0.5% (wt/vol) of yeast extract, and 0.1% (vol/vol) of Tween 80. Commercial red grape juice was replaced with commercial white grape juice to prepare White Grape Juice medium (9). MLO medium (65) contains casein peptone (10 g/L), yeast extract (5 g/L), Tween 80 (1 g/L), sodium citrate (3.5 g/L), MgSO₄ 7 H₂O (0.2 g/L), MnSO₄ 7 H₂O (0.05 g/L), glucose (10 g/L), fructose (5 g/L), and tomato juice (100 mL). The pH of the media was adjusted to 4.8 using a concentrated HCl solution (37%). Solid media were prepared by adding 2.5% (wt/vol) of agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bordeaux, France). All media were sterilized by autoclaving at 121°C for 15 min.

## Propagation of oenophages

Amplification of X27 on the bacterial host was carried out in MRS broth supplemented with MgSO4 (3.75 g/L) and CaCl2 (2.375 g/L) (MRSφ) as follows. A liquid culture (10 mL at OD 0.3) was infected with 100 µL of phage lysate and incubated for 3 days at 25°C. It was centrifuged upon lysis at 10,000 g for 10 min. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 µm polyethersulfone membrane filter (4). Phages X27 and X28 were obtained from a collection of uncharacterized phages collected during previous surveys (8, 9) and stored inside infected cells at -80°C.

Tenfold serial dilutions of the fresh lysates were prepared in phage buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5; 0.1 M NaCl; 8 mM MgSO4). Phages were enumerated using the classical double-layer plating technique (4). MRSφ agar plates were incubated in jars under anaerobic conditions using GasPak EZ sachets (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bordeaux, France) for 5-7 days at 25°C.
Optimal multiplicity of infection in liquid infection of IOEBS277 by X₂₇

The IOEBS277 strain was grown until an OD of 0.05 was reached in MRS<sub>Φ</sub> broth (100 mL). The culture was distributed into 9 mL aliquots. Volumes of 1 mL of phage X₂₇ and dilutions thereof were added to the cultures to yield MOIs ranging from 10<sup>-2</sup> to 10<sup>-6</sup>. A control with no added phage was prepared. All tubes were incubated at 25°C and visually examined after 3 days (9).

TEM observations

A 50 mL phage lysate was centrifuged at 20,000 g for 2 h. The pellet was air-dried and resuspended in 50 µL of SM buffer (100 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 8 mM MgSO₄) (66). A volume of 10 µL (~10⁹ PFU/mL) was deposited on a carbon-coated copper grid for 30 s, then colored with uranyl acetate (saturated in water pH 4.5) for 30 s. The phage was visualized using a Hitachi H7650 electron microscope operated at 80 kV.

Host spectrum of X₂₇

The X₂₇ phage lysate was dialyzed against 500 mL of SM buffer for 3 h at 4°C, with one buffer change. A Float-A-Lyzer G2 Dialysis Device Molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) 100 kDa (Sigma-Aldrich, France) was used according to manufacturer's directions. The propagation of the phage was tested on a panel of *O. oeni* and *O. kitaharae* strains as follows. The phage lysate was spotted (8 µL) in duplicates at eight concentrations (10⁹ to 10² PFU/mL) onto those selected potential hosts. The resistance level of bacterial strains to the phage was expressed using the efficiency of plating (EOP) ratio. The EOP was defined as the ratio between PFUs/mL obtained on each putative resistant strain and PFUs/mL obtained on the strain initially used for the phage propagation (*O. oeni* IOEB S277). The EOP value was classified as "high production" when the ratio ranged from 1 to 10⁻¹. An EOP between 10⁻² and 10⁻⁷ was considered to be of "medium production" efficiency. Finally, an EOP under 10⁻⁸ was classified as inefficient, and corresponding strains were considered as resistant strains (54, 66).

Adsorption experiments

Cells in early exponential phase growth (2 mL with an OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.2) were centrifuged at
10,000 g for 10 min. The pellet containing approximately 8 × 10<sup>8</sup> Colony Forming Unit
(CFUs) was resuspended in 1,600 µL of fresh MRS<sub>Φ</sub> broth. The phage lysate was placed
at room temperature for 15 min. A volume of 400 µL of diluted lysate (corresponding
to ~2.7 × 10<sup>6</sup> PFUs) was prepared and added to the 1,600 µL of sample, to yield an MOI
of 0.003. The 2 mL sample was immediately homogenized, and a volume of 200 µL (T0)
was immediately collected, centrifuged (10,000 g, 5 min), and filtered. The remainder of
the sample was equally distributed in four tubes which were placed at 25°C in a water
bath. They were periodically removed after 20, 30, 40, and 60 min and centrifuged. All
supernatants were serially diluted and titrated on strain IOEBS277 to give the concentra-
tions of free (unbound) phages over time (54).

One-step growth and burst size

A 2 mL adsorption assay was prepared as described above. A volume of 200 µL was immediately removed at T0, centrifuged, and filtered. The infected culture was incubated at 25°C for 60 min to allow phage adsorption. After this period, removal of unadsorbed virions was performed by centrifugation of the 1.8 mL sample (10,000 g for 5 min at 4°C). Supernatants collected at T0 and T60 were titrated in order to measure adsorption rate. The pellet containing infected cells was gently resuspended in 10 mL of pre-heated MRS<sub>Φ</sub> broth. A volume of 500 µL was removed and added to 29.5 mL of MRS<sub>Φ</sub> broth. The diluted infected cells were distributed in 2 mL samples, which were incubated at 25°C. Samples were withdrawn over time for their application in an infectious center assay following centrifugation.
The burst size is the ratio of phages produced compared to the initial number of infective centers. It was calculated as the ratio of the final count of liberated virions at the end of the burst period to the initial count of infected bacterial cells at the beginning of the latent period. The lysis time was the number of hours before the increase in plaque number occurred. Three replicate experiments were conducted to estimate adsorption rate, burst size, and lysis time (66).

## Genome sequencing, genomic comparisons, and phylogenetic analyses

The phage lysate was concentrated by ultracentrifugation, and double-stranded DNA was extracted as described previously (4, 5). Whole-genome sequencing was performed at the Genome-Transcriptome facility of Bordeaux (https://pgtb.cgfb.u-bordeaux.fr). DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Genomic DNA was sequenced by Illumina MiSeq using 2 × 250 bp paired-end libraries. Reads were assembled using SPAdes (version 3.14.1) (67) with default parameters (read correction and assembler). The assembly of the whole-genome sequences was verified using *Hind*III, *Eco*RI, and *Bam*HI restriction profiles of phage DNAs and gel electrophoresis.

The sequences of the assembled phages were then used to predict ORFs with RAST (http://rast.nmpdr.org/) and Pharokka (https://github.com/gbouras13/pharokka) (68). The latter includes the tRNAscan-SE program (http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/tRNAscan-SE/) (69).

The *in silico*-translated protein sequences were used as queries to search for sequence homologs in the non-redundant protein database at the National Centre for Biotechnology. Deduced proteins were examined for their function using BLAST v.2.10.0 and a cutoff E value of 0.001. Searches for distant homologs were performed using HHpred (70) against different protein databases, including PFAM (Database of Protein Families), PDB, CDD, PHROG, and Clusters of Orthologous Groups, which are accessible via the HHpred website. Searches against the CDD database at NCBI were also performed using CD-search (71).

The online analysis tools Arnold (72), which predict the existence and location of Rho-independent transcription terminators employing RNAmotif and ERPIN complementary programs and TMHMM (73), were used. Average nucleotide identity was obtained using VIRIDIC (version 1) to determine the overall similarity between two genomic sequences and then visualized by pheatmap in R (48, 49). For genomes, all pairwise comparisons of the nucleotide sequences were conducted using the Genome-BLAST Distance Phylogeny method using VICTOR under settings recommended for prokaryotic viruses as earlier published (9). Genome homology was visualized using Clinker (14).

## PCR screening of Krappavirus phages in our collection

Phage lysates were typed by PCR as reported before (9, 11) using specific primers TMP7-F 5'-tagaaacatatacggcacagcc-3' and TMP7-R 5'-tctagaaccttgttcaaaagcgt_3'), which were designed to amplify a portion of the tape measure protein of Krappavirus phages, without any cross-reactivity with other oenophages.

## Host adhesion device structure prediction

$X_{27}$ protein sequences encoded by genes located in between the *tmp* and *lysin-holin* were submitted to HHpred (74). Structure predictions were performed for the Dit and Tal proteins using an AlphaFold2 Github notebook (https://colab.research.google.com/github/deepmind/alphafold/blob/main/notebooks/AlphaFold.ipynb#scrollTo=XUo6foMQxwS2) (32), enabling structure predictions of multimers. The structure of Dit was predicted as a monomer and as a hexamer. Due to memory limitations, the long Tal was split into distinct stretches with large overlapping regions for later assembly. Monomeric and trimeric structures
were predicted for each of them. Structure of the full-length Tal was obtained by superimposing the overlapping regions onto each other using Coot (75). AF2 provides an index called predicted local distance difference test (pLDDT) estimating the prediction accuracy along the protein chain, from 0 to 100 (best). In practice, pLDDT values over 80–90 compare to average-resolution crystal structures. The pLDDT values, which are stored in the PDB files as B-factors, were plotted using Excel. The final predicted domain structures were submitted into the Dali server (76) to identify the closest structural homologs in the PDB. Sequence alignments were performed with Multalin (77) and ESPript (78). Structure analyses and visual representations were performed with ChimeraX (79).

## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR-21-CE11-0018-01). Y.B. was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (Algeria) via the Excellence PhD Doctoral Training Program (grant no. 003Bis/PG./France/2019/2020).

ChimeraX, which was used for molecular graphics and analyses, was developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco, with support from the National Institutes of Health R01-GM129325 and the Office of Cyber Infrastructure and Computational Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

C.L.M. and Y.B. would like to dedicate this work to the memory of our esteemed colleague and friend, Dr. Alessandra Occhialini-Cantet.

Y.B., F.O.H., A.C. and C.P. collected the samples, isolated the phages and performed the genome sequencing. A.C. and O.C. performed bioinformatics analysis. A.G. and C.C. ran the adhesion topology analysis. F.O.H., O.C., A.C., A.G. and C.L.M. wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. C.L.M. designed the study and supervised the work progress.

## AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS

## AUTHOR ORCIDs

Florencia Oviedo-Hernandez ID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-6115

Cécile Philippe ID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1105-6571

Christian Cambillau ID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5502-4729

Adeline Goulet ID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-9488

Claire Le Marrec ID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4175-6598

## FUNDING

<table><thead><tr><td>Funder</td><td>Grant(s)</td><td>Author(s)</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Algerian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research</td><td>grant no. 003Bis/PG./France/2019/2020</td><td>Yasma Barchi</td></tr><tr><td>Agence Nationale de la Recherche</td><td>ANR-21-CE11-0018-01</td><td>Florencia Oviedo-Hernandez<br>Amel Chaïb<br>Olivier Claisse</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote n="1">¹Université Bordeaux, INRAE, Bordeaux INP, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, UMR1366 Œnologie, F-33140, Villenave d'Ornon, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²School of Microbiology & APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Macromoléculaires (LISM, UMR7255), Institut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée, Aix Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Marseille, France</footnote>
<table><thead><tr><td>Funder</td><td>Grant(s)</td><td>Author(s)</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Claire Le Marrec</td></tr></tbody></table>

## AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Adeline Goulet, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing.

## DATA AVAILABILITY

The full genomes of *O. oeni* phages X27and X149 were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PQ156465 and PQ156466. Structural models are deposited in the Zenodo repository under the identifiers AA, BB.

## ADDITIONAL FILES

The following material is available online.

## Supplemental Material

Supplemental material (Spectrum02588-24-s0001.docx). Figures S1 to S7; Tables S1 and S2.

## REFERENCES

1. Lorentzen MPG, Lucas PM. 2019. Distribution of *Oenococcus oeni* populations in natural habitats. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:2937–2945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09689-z

2. Virdis C, Sumby K, Bartowsky E, Jiranek V. 2020. Lactic acid bacteria in wine: technological advances and evaluation of their functional role. Front Microbiol 11:612118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.612118

3. Liu D, Zhang P, Chen D, Howell K. 2019. From the vineyard to the vineyard: how microbial ecology drives regional distinctiveness of wine. Front Microbiol 10:2679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02679

4. Chaïb A, Decossas M, Philippe C, Claisse O, Lambert O, Le Marrec C. 2020. Isolation and of CryoTEM phages infecting bacterial wine spoilers. Bio Protoc 10:e3801. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.3801

5. Chaïb A, Philippe C, Jaomanjaka F, Barchi Y, Oviedo-Hernandez F, Claisse O, Le Marrec C. 2022. Phage-host interactions as a driver of population dynamics during wine fermentation: betting on underdogs. Int J Food Microbiol 383:109936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109936

6. Claisse O, Chaïb A, Jaomanjaka F, Philippe C, Barchi Y, Lucas PM, Le Marrec C. 2021. Distribution of prophages in the *Oenococcus oeni* species. Microorganisms 9:856. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040856

7. Onetto CA, Costello PJ, Kolouchova R, Jordans C, McCarthy J, Schmidt SA. 2021. Analysis of transcriptomic response to SO₂ by *Oenococcus oeni* growing in continuous culture. Microbiol Spectr 9:e0115421. https://doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.01154-21

8. Philippe C, Jaomanjaka F, Claisse O, Laforgue R, Maupeu J, Petrel M, Le Marrec C. 2017. A survey of oenophages during wine making reveals a novel group with unusual genomic characteristics. Int J Food Microbiol 257:138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.06.014

9. Philippe C, Chaïb A, Jaomanjaka F, Claisse O, Lucas PM, Samot J, Cambillau C, Le Marrec C. 2020. Characterization of the first virulent phage infecting *Oenococcus oeni*, the queen of the cellars. Front Microbiol 11:596541. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.596541

10. Goulet A, Cambillau C. 2021. Structure and topology prediction of phage adhesion devices using AlphaFold2: the case of two *Oenococcus oeni* phages. Microorganisms 9:2151. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganism9102151

11. Barchi Y, Philippe C, Chaïb A, Oviedo-Hernandez F, Claisse O, Le Marrec C. 2022. Phage encounters recorded in CRISPR arrays in the genus *Oenococcus*. Viruses 15:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15010015

12. Fernandes S, São-José C. 2018. Enzymes and mechanisms employed by tailed bacteriophages to breach the bacterial cell barriers. Viruses 10:396. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10080396

13. Knecht LE, Veljkovic M, Fieseler L. 2019. Diversity and function of phage encoded depolymerases. Front Microbiol 10:2949. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02949

14. Gilchrist CLM, Chooi YH. 2021. Clinker & clustermap.js: automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics 37:2473–2475. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab007

15. Casjens S, Winn-Stapley DA, Gilcrease EB, Morona R, Kühlewein C, Chua JEH, Manning PA, Inwood W, Clark AJ. 2004. The chromosome of *Shigella flexneri* bacteriophage Sf6: complete nucleotide sequence, genetic mosaicism, and DNA packaging. J Mol Biol 339:379–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.068

16. Kyrkou I, Carstens AB, Ellegaard-Jensen L, Kot W, Zervas A, Djurhuus AM, Neve H, Franz C, Hansen M, Hansen LH. 2020. Isolation and characterization of novel phages infecting *Lactobacillus plantarum* and proposal of a new genus, "Silenusvirus". Sci Rep 10:8763. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65366-6

17. Bloch S, Lewandowska N, Węgrzyn G, Nejman-Faleńczyk B. 2021. Bacteriophages as sources of small non-coding RNA molecules. Plasmid 113:102527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plasmid.2020.102527

18. Endo A, Okada S. 2005. *Lactobacillus satsumensis* sp. nov., isolated from mashes of shochu, a traditional Japanese distilled spirit made from fermented rice and other starchy materials. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:83–85. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63248-0

19. Nyhan LM, Lynch KM, Sahin AW, Arendt EK. 2022. Advances in kombucha tea fermentation: a review. Appl Microbiol 2:73–103. https://doi.org/10.3390/aplmicrobiol2010005

20. São-José C. 2018. Engineering of phage-derived lytic enzymes: improving their potential as antimicrobials. Antibiotics (Basel) 7:29. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics7020029

21. Catalão MJ, Gil F, Moniz-Pereira J, São-José C, Pimentel M. 2013. Diversity in bacterial lysis systems: bacteriophages show the way. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:554–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12006

22. Tisza MJ, Buck CB. 2021. A catalog of tens of thousands of viruses from human metagenomes reveals hidden associations with chronic diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118:23. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023202118

23. Lu N, Sun Y, Wang Q, Qiu Y, Chen Z, Wen Y, Wang S, Song Y. 2020. Cloning and characterization of endolysin and holin from *Streptomyces avermitilis* bacteriophage phiSASD1 as potential novel antibiotic candidates. Int J Biol Macromol 147:980–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.065

24. Steczkiewicz K, Prestel E, Bidnenko E, Szczepankowska AK. 2021. Expanding diversity of *Firmicutes* single-strand annealing proteins: a putative role of bacteriophage-host arms race. Front Microbiol 12:644622. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.644622
25. Neamah MM, Mir-Sanchis I, López-Sanz M, Acosta S, Baquedano I, Haag AF, Marina A, Ayora S, Penadés JR. 2017. Sak and Sak4 recombinases are required for bacteriophage replication in *Staphylococcus aureus*. Nucleic Acids Res 45:6507–6519. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx308

26. Moura de Sousa JA, Pfeifer E, Touchon M, Rocha EPC. 2021. Causes and consequences of bacteriophage diversification via genetic exchanges across lifestyles and bacterial taxa. Mol Biol Evol 38:2497–2512. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab044

27. Labrie SJ, Moineau S. 2007. Abortive infection mechanisms and prophage sequences significantly influence the genetic makeup of emerging lytic lactococcal phages. J Bacteriol 189:1482–1487. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01111-06

28. Gogarten JP, Hilario E. 2006. Inteins, introns, and homing endonucleases: recent revelations about the life cycle of parasitic genetic elements. BMC Evol Biol 6:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-6-94

29. Turner D, Kropinski AM, Adriaenssens EM. 2021. A roadmap for genome-based phage taxonomy. Viruses 13:506–527. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13030506

30. White K, Yu J-H, Eraclio G, Dal Bello F, Nauta A, Mahony J, van Sinderen D. 2022. Bacteriophage-host interactions as a platform to establish the role of phages in modulating the microbial composition of fermented foods. Microbiome Res Rep 1:3. https://doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2021.04

31. Goulet A, Spinelli S, Mahony J, Cambillau C. 2020. Conserved and diverse traits of adhesion devices from *Siphoviridae* recognizing proteinaceous or saccharidic receptors. Viruses 12:512. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12050512

32. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Židek A, Potapenko A, et al. 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596:583–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

33. Mirdita M, Schütze K, Moriwaki Y, Heo L, Ovchinnikov S, Steinegger M. 2022. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat Methods 19:679–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1

34. Goulet A, Joos R, Lavelle K, Van Sinderen D, Mahony J, Cambillau C. 2022. A structural discovery journey of streptococcal phages adhesion devices by AlphaFold2. Front Mol Biosci 9:960325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.960325

35. Veesler D, Robin G, Lichière J, Auzat I, Tavares P, Bron P, Campanacci V, Cambillau C. 2010. Crystal structure of bacteriophage SPP1 distal tail protein (gp19.1): a baseplate HUB paradigm in Gram-positive infecting phages. J Biol Chem 285:36666–36673. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110157529

36. Xiao H, Tan L, Tan Z, Zhang Y, Chen W, Li X, Song J, Cheng L, Liu H. 2023. Structure of the siphage neck-Tail complex suggests that conserved tail tip proteins facilitate receptor binding and tail assembly. PLoS Biol 21:e3002441. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002441

37. Sciara G, Bebeacua C, Bron P, Tremblay D, Ortiz-Lombardia M, Lichière J, van Heel M, Campanacci V, Moineau S, Cambillau C. 2010. Structure of lactococcal phage p2 baseplate and its mechanism of activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:6852–6857. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000232107

38. Flayhan A, Vellieux FMD, Lurz R, Maury O, Contreras-Martel C, Girard E, Boulanger P, Breyton C. 2014. Crystal structure of pb9, the distal tail protein of bacteriophage T5: a conserved structural motif among all siphophages. J Virol 88:820–828. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02135-13

39. Veesler D, Spinelli S, Mahony J, Lichière J, Blangy S, Bricogne G, Legrand P, Ortiz-Lombardia M, Campanacci V, van Sinderen D, Cambillau C. 2012. Structure of the phage TP901-1 1.8 MDa baseplate suggests an alternative host adhesion mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:8954–8958. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200966109

40. Bárdy P, Fúzik T, Hrebík D, Pantúček R, Thomas Beatty J, Plevka P. 2020. Structure and mechanism of DNA delivery of a gene transfer agent. Nat Commun 11:3034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16669-9

41. Kanamaru S, Leiman PG, Kostyuchenko VA, Chipman PR, Mesyanzhinov VV, Arisaka F, Rossmann MG. 2002. Structure of the cell-puncturing device of bacteriophage T4. Nature 415:553–557. https://doi.org/10.1038/8/415553a

42. Veesler D, Cambillau C. 2011. A common evolutionary origin for tailed-bacteriophage functional modules and bacterial machineries. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75:423–433. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00014-11

43. Browning C, Shneider MM, Bowman VD, Schwarzer D, Leiman PG. 2012. Phage pierces the host cell membrane with the iron-loaded spike. Structure 20:326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2011.12.009

44. Garcia-Doval C, Castón JR, Luque D, Granell M, Otero JM, Llamas-Saiz AL, Renouard M, Boulanger P, van Raaij MJ. 2015. Structure of the receptor-binding carboxy-terminal domain of the bacteriophage T5 L-shaped tail Fibre with and without its intra-molecular chaperone. Viruses 7:6424–6440. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7122946

45. Schulz EC, Dickmanns A, Urlaub H, Schmitt A, Mühlenhoff M, Stummeyer K, Schwarzer D, Gerardy-Schahn R, Ficner R. 2010. Crystal structure of an intramolecular chaperone mediating triple-beta-helix folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:210–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1746

46. Wu P, Zhen X, Li B, Yu Q, Huang X, Shi N. 2021. Crystal structure of the MyRF ICA domain with its upstream β-helical stalk reveals the molecular mechanisms underlying its trimerization and self-cleavage. Int J Biol Sci 17:2931–2943. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.57673

47. Valencia-Toxqui G, Ramsey J. 2024. How to introduce a new bacteriophage on the block: a short guide to phage classification. J Virol 98:e0182123. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01821-23

48. Moraru C, Varsani A, Kropinski AM. 2020. VIRIDIC—a novel tool to calculate the intergenomic similarities of prokaryote-infecting viruses. Viruses 12:1268. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111268

49. Adriaenssens E, Brister JR. 2017. How to name and classify your phage: an informal guide. Viruses 9:70. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9040070

50. Kupczok A, Neve H, Huang KD, Hoeppner MP, Heller KJ, Franz CMAP, Dagan T. 2018. Rates of mutation and recombination in *Siphoviridae* phage genome evolution over three decades. Mol Biol Evol 35:1147–1159. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mysy027

51. Kodaira KI, Oki M, Kakikawa M, Watanabe N, Hirakawa M, Yamada K, Taketo A. 1997. Genome structure of the *Lactobacillus* temperate phage phig1e: the whole genome sequence and the putative promoter/repressor. Gene 187:45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1119(96)0068-7-7

52. Leavitt JC, Gilcrease EB, Wilson K, Casjens SR. 2013. Function and horizontal transfer of the small terminase subunit of the tailed bacteriophage Sf6 DNA packaging nanomotor. Virology (Auckl) 440:117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2013.02.023

53. Mahony J. 2021. Cell surface polysaccharides represent a common strategy for adsorption among phages infecting lactic acid bacteria: lessons from dairy lactococci and streptococci. mSystems 6:e0064121. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00641-21

54. Philippe C, Chaïb A, Jaomanjaka F, Cluzet S, Lagarde A, Ballestra P, Decendit A, Petrel M, Claisse O, Goulet A, Cambillau C, Le Marrec C. 2020. Wine phenolic compounds differently affect the host-killing activity of two lytic bacteriophages infecting the lactic acid bacterium *Oenococcus oeni*. Viruses 12:1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111316

55. Otręba M, Marek Ł, Tyczyńska N, Stojko J, Kurek-Górecka A, Górecki M, Olczyk P, Rzepecka-Stojko A. 2022. Propolis as natural product in the oral cavity bacterial infections treatment: a systematic review. Appl Sci (Basel) 12:10123. https://doi.org/10.3390/app121910123

56. Guérin H, Kulakauskas S, Chapot-Chartier MP. 2022. Structural variations and roles of rhamnose-rich cell wall polysaccharides in Gram-positive bacteria. J Biol Chem 298:102488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102488

57. Maes E, Sadovskaya I, Yamakawa N, Goulet A, Le Marrec C, Chapot-Chartier MP. 2025. Isolation and structure elucidation of cell surface polysaccharides from *Oenococcus oeni*. Carbohydr Res 552:109456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2025.109456

58. Dieterle ME, Fina Martin J, Durán R, Nemirovsky SI, Sanchez Rivas C, Bowman C, Russell D, Hatfull GF, Cambillau C, Piuri M. 2016. Characterization of prophages containing “evolved” Dit/Tal modules in the genome of *Lactobacillus casei* BL23. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:9201–9215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7727-x

59. Dieterle ME, Spinelli S, Sadovskaya I, Piuri M, Cambillau C. 2017. Evolved distal tail carbohydrate binding modules of *Lactobacillus* phage J-1: a novel type of anti-receptor widespread among lactic acid bacteria phages. Mol Microbiol 104:608–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13649

60. De Paepe M, Hutinet G, Son O, Amarir-Bouhram J, Schbath S, Petit M-A. 2014. Temperate phages acquire DNA from defective prophages by relaxed homologous recombination: the role of Rad52-like recombinases. PLoS Genet 10:e1004181. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004181

61. Kelley DS, Lennon CW, Belfort M, Novikova O, SEA-PHAGES. 2016. Mycobacteriophages as incubators for intein dissemination and evolution. MBio 7:e01537-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01537-16

62. Smug BJ, Szczepaniak K, Rocha EPC, Dunin-Horkawicz S, Mostowy RJ. 2023. Ongoing shuffling of protein fragments diversifies core viral
functions linked to interactions with bacterial hosts. Nat Commun
14:7460. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43236-9

63. Endo A, Okada S. 2006. *Oenococcus kitaharae* sp. nov., a non-acidophilic and non-malolactic-fermenting *Oenococcus* isolated from a composting distilled shochu residue. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2345-2348. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64288-0

64. Barchi Y, Chaib A, Oviedo-Hernandez F, Decossas M, Claisse O, Le Marrec C. 2023. Draft genome sequence of *Oenococcus kitaharae* CRBO2176, isolated from home-made water kefir. Microbiol Resour Announc 12:e0107222. https://doi.org/10.1128/mra.01072-22

65. Caspritz G, Radler F. 1983. Malolactic enzyme of *Lactobacillus plantarum*. Purification, properties, and distribution among bacteria. J Biol Chem 258:4907-4910. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)32513-4

66. Jaomanjaka F, Claisse O, Blanche-Barbat M, Petrel M, Ballestra P, Le Marrec C. 2016. Characterization of a new virulent phage infecting the lactic acid bacterium *Oenococcus oeni*. Food Microbiol 54:167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2015.09.016

67. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455-477. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021

68. Bouras G, Nepal R, Houtak G, Psaltis AJ, Wormald PJ, Vreugde S. 2023. Pharokka: a fast scalable bacteriophage annotation tool. Bioinformatics 39:1. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac776

69. Chan PP, Lin BY, Mak AJ, Lowe TM. 2021. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 49:9077-9096. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab688

70. Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244-W248. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki408

71. Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. 2004. CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res 32:W327-W331. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh454

72. Naville M, Ghuillot-Gaudessy A, Marchais A, Gautherot D. 2011. ARNold: a web tool for the prediction of Rho-independent transcription terminators. RNA Biol 8:11-13. https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.8.1.13346

73. Hallgren J, Tsirigos KD, Pedersen MD, Almagro Armenteros JJ, Marcatili P, Nielsen H, Krogh A, Winther O. 2022. DeepTMHMM predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.08.487609

74. Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam SZ, Rau D, Kübler J, Lozajic M, Gabler F, Söding J, Lupas AN, Alva VA. 2018. Completely reimplemented MPI bioinformatics toolkit with a new HHpred server at its core. J Mol Biol 430:2237-2243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007

75. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. 2010. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:486-501. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910007493

76. Holm L. 2022. Dali server: structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 50:W210-W215. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac387

77. Corpet F. 1988. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res 16:10881-10890. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/16.22.10881

78. Gouet P, Robert X, Courcelle E. 2003. ESPrict/ENDscript: extracting and rendering sequence and 3D information from atomic structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3320-3323. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg556

79. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Meng EC, Couch GS, Croll TI, Morris JH, Ferrin TE. 2021. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci 30:70-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3943