<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

HAL
open science

# Variation and convergence in the morpho-functional properties of the mammalian neocortex

Séverine Mahon

► To cite this version:

Séverine Mahon. Variation and convergence in the morpho-functional properties of the mammalian neocortex. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2024, 10.3389/fnsys.2024.1413780. hal-04641934

HAL Id: hal-04641934

https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-04641934v1

Submitted on 9 Jul 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

OPEN ACCESS

EDITED BY
Carlos Cepeda,
University of California, Los Angeles,
United States

REVIEWED BY
Yao-Ying Ma,
Indiana University Bloomington, United States
Damian M. Cummings,
University College London, United Kingdom

*CORRESPONDENCE

Séverine Mahon

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

severine.mahon@upmc.fr

RECEIVED 07 April 2024

ACCEPTED 03 June 2024

PUBLISHED 20 June 2024

CITATION

Mahon S (2024) Variation and convergence in the morpho-functional properties of the mammalian neocortex.
*Front. Syst. Neurosci.* 18:1413780.

doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2024.1413780

COPYRIGHT

© 2024 Mahon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the [Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

# Variation and convergence in the morpho-functional properties of the mammalian neocortex

Séverine Mahon*

Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France

Man's natural inclination to classify and hierarchize the living world has prompted neurophysiologists to explore possible differences in brain organisation between mammals, with the aim of understanding the diversity of their behavioural repertoires. But what really distinguishes the human brain from that of a platypus, an opossum or a rodent? In this review, we compare the structural and electrical properties of neocortical neurons in the main mammalian radiations and examine their impact on the functioning of the networks they form. We discuss variations in overall brain size, number of neurons, length of their dendritic trees and density of spines, acknowledging their increase in humans as in most large-brained species. Our comparative analysis also highlights a remarkable consistency, particularly pronounced in marsupial and placental mammals, in the cell typology, intrinsic and synaptic electrical properties of pyramidal neuron subtypes, and in their organisation into functional circuits. These shared cellular and network characteristics contribute to the emergence of strikingly similar large-scale physiological and pathological brain dynamics across a wide range of species. These findings support the existence of a core set of neural principles and processes conserved throughout mammalian evolution, from which a number of species-specific adaptations appear, likely allowing distinct functional needs to be met in a variety of environmental contexts.

KEYWORDS

neocortex, pyramidal neurons, cortical circuits, intrinsic excitability, brain rhythms, mammals, evolution

## 1 Introduction

Questions about the specific properties of the human brain originated in the debates that followed the publication of *Darwin* (1859)'s *Origin of Species*. Challenging long-held beliefs, largely inherited from the biblical Genesis account, that humans were by essence different from other animals, the application of the theory of evolution to humans soon gave rise to lively discussions about the biological traits likely to differentiate humans from apes and stimulated the first thoughts about the relationship between brain size and cognitive ability. Considered a good indicator of intelligence by most scientists in the second half of the 19th century, overall brain size eventually proved to be an irrelevant measure of behavioural complexity, prompting the exploration of other levels of brain organisation. Thanks to *in vitro* investigations on postoperative tissue, our knowledge of the human neocortex—the cerebral structure whose functioning is critically involved in behavioural and cognitive abilities—has progressed considerably in recent years, providing the basis for inter-species comparisons at multiple levels. After tracing the historical origins of these questions back to the controversies surrounding the first discoveries of human fossils, this review is intended to provide an updated view of the functional organisation
of the neocortex in representatives of the three major mammalian radiations, including humans. We will first analyze variations in brain size, number of cortical areas and number of neurons at a macroscopic level, before focusing on the anatomical and physiological features of neocortical pyramidal neurons. Adopting a reductionist approach, we will systematically compare (when data permit) the morphology, connectivity and electrical properties of pyramidal neuron subtypes between species, attempting to determine, where differences are observed, whether they are part of a continuum of variations or whether they represent genuine singularities leading to significant changes in the activity patterns of cortical circuits.

## 2 Eugene Dubois and the missing link

Proponents of Darwin's theory, led by the German biologist Ernst Haeckel, published essays in the 1860s discussing the status of the human species from an evolutionary point of view. According to Haeckel, the process of hominization was based on the acquisition of bipedalism, language and a large brain. In his family tree of the human species, which he attempted to reconstruct on the basis of comparative anatomical and embryological data, Haeckel inserted an intermediate evolutionary stage between the great apes and man, occupied by a hypothetical species called *Pithecanthropus* (ape-man) *alalus* (speechless). He imagined that this mute ape-man, originating from a continent now sunk in the Indian Ocean (*Lemuria*), could have spread and evolved in different parts of the world to give rise to different humanities and languages (Haeckel, 1868). Inspired by the work of Darwin and Haeckel and convinced of the necessity to support the theory of evolution with palaeontological evidence, in 1887 the young anatomist Eugène Dubois took the surprising decision to quit a promising academic career at the University of Amsterdam to mount an excavation campaign in the Dutch East Indies in search of the missing link between apes and humans. Accompanied by his wife Anna Lojenga and their daughter, Dubois enlisted as a medical officer in the Royal East India Army and set sail for the Indonesian archipelago aboard the *Princess Amelia* (Theunissen, 1988; Wood, 2020).

After arriving on the island of Java, Dubois conducted extensive excavations in the summer of 1891 near the village of Trinil, along the Solo River (Figure 1). He initially uncovered a right maxillary third molar and a skull cap whose characteristics—a receding forehead, a supra-orbital torus and an estimated capacity of 700–750 cm³ (about half the size of present-day humans)—suggested a large ape. However, the next year, Dubois unearthed a left femur some 15 metres upstream from the first remains, showing clear adaptations to upright posture and bipedalism (Theunissen, 1988). By discovering an individual whose skull and teeth displayed anthropoid ape characteristics but whose femur showed human-like features, Dubois had just uncovered fossil evidence of the hypothetical transitional primate envisioned by Haeckel, and at the same time provided one of the first material indications of human evolution. Initially named *Anthropithecus erectus* (an ape that stands and moves like a man) in the excavation reports, Dubois later renamed his new species *Pithecanthropus erectus*, emphasising its status as

an upright "ape-man," when he published his final manuscript (Figure 1). In good faith, he even revised the cranial capacity of his specimen to 850–900 cm³ (Dubois, 1894, 1896; Wood, 2020).

The discovery of *Pithecanthropus erectus* sparked controversy, particularly over the attribution of the remains to an ape, a human, an intermediate being, or even to different individuals. Dubois had to face the scepticism of his prominent European colleagues who would have preferred an ancestor with a larger brain but less exotic origins (Leguebe, 1992), such as the Piltdown Man discovered in Sussex in 1912, which had a large human-like skull and an ape-like mandible, but which ultimately turned out to be one of the greatest paleoanthropological hoaxes (Stringer, 2012). In response to debates over the interpretation of his fossils, Dubois undertook research on the allometric relationship between brain weight and body weight. Extending earlier theoretical works (Snell, 1892), he established that brain size was not only related to body weight by a decreasing power function but also depended on a "coefficient of cephalization," supposed to reflect the degree of development and complexification of the brain (Dubois, 1897). Applying this mathematical relationship to his fossils, Dubois calculated that the cephalization coefficient of *Pithecanthropus erectus* was roughly half that of anatomically modern humans and double that of apes, further confirming the intermediate evolutionary position of the Javanese primate (Dubois, 1899).

*Pithecanthropus erectus* is no longer considered the missing link. The idea of a hybrid creature, half ape and half human, making a direct transition between great apes and modern man, now belongs to the realm of fiction. The accumulation of fossil discoveries has led researchers to abandon the traditional vision of a linear and directed human evolution in favour of a more complex and diversified human lineage, made up of multiple species that most often coexisted. The concept of the missing link, which encompasses both the notion of continuity and rupture, remains pertinent as it questions the singularity of the "after" in relation to the "before." Man is often seen as a species apart, distinguished by the complexity of its cultures, social interactions and ability to communicate. A species whose considerable brain growth over time would have accompanied the emergence of remarkable cognitive capacities, enabling man to conquer and transform almost all of the terrestrial ecosystems. But the question remains: does our large brain possess truly distinctive properties? And if so, are these differences merely quantitative or do they represent a genuine qualitative leap?

## 3 The long-standing question of size

Questions of absolute or relative brain size seem to have preoccupied mankind long before Dubois and his contemporaries since they already appear in the writings of Aristotle, who notes that "of all animals, man has the largest brain in proportion to his size" (Aristotle, ca. 335 BCE); a statement that is not entirely accurate, as we shall see below. However, it was mainly in the second half of the 19th century that the relationship between brain size and human cognitive ability became a central theme
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 1</figcaption></figure>

**Top left.** The Island of Java in the Indonesian archipelago. **Right.** The skull cap of *Pithecanthropus erectus*. **Middle.** Excavations at Trinil in 1890s on the left bank of the Solo River. The arrow indicates the approximate discovery site of the skull cap. **Bottom left.** Profile drawing of the Trinil site showing the position of the fossil remains in the sediment (level D). **Right.** Handwritten page from Dubois' article published in 1894 and photograph (John Reader/Science Photo Library) of his reconstruction of *Pithecanthropus erectus*, shown at the 1900 Universal Exhibition in Paris. Adapted with permission from Wood, 2020, and Dubois, 1896.

of discussion among the scientific community, particularly within
the *Société d'Anthropologie de Paris*, founded by the eminent
neuroanatomist Paul Broca the year Darwin published his *Origin
of Species*. A partisan of polygenist theories, which, in opposition to
the creationist myth, favoured a multiple origin for the different
human groups, but unfortunately mired in the prejudices of
his time, Broca mistakenly thought that he could rank ethnic
groups (and human beings in general) according to their level of
intelligence by comparing the weight of their brains. By sorting
individuals according to their ethnic origin, sex or profession,
Broca came to the conclusion that white European men, whom
he described as "distinguished" (as opposed to manual workers),
were endowed with superior intelligence (Broca, 1861). In a
similar vein, Francis Galton, an anthropologist renowned for his
contributions to modern statistics and, more infamously, for his
eugenics theories, later conducted a study into the brain size of

Cambridge students. He also claimed, on the basis of measurements
of questionable rigour, that those who graduated with honours
had larger brains than those who did not receive such distinction
(Galton, 1889).

In the wake of phrenology, which claimed to determine
character traits and mental faculties by inspecting the size
of bumps on the surface of skulls, the underlying—perhaps
somewhat simplistic—assumption behind these early attempts
to explain differences in cognitive ability by brain size was
that any increase in the size of an organ should correspond
to an increase in its function. Craniometric studies based on
the social or geographical origins of human beings, which
served as scientific justification for the expansionist ambitions
of many countries in the 19th and 20th centuries, fortunately
declined after the Second World War. However, the search for
principles behind the evolution of the mammalian brain has never
ceased to intrigue scientists, who continue to study variations
in absolute and relative brain size between species, as well as
the evolution of its different parts, paying particular attention to
the neocortex because of its essential role in the generation of
complex behaviours.

## 3.1 Brain size in mammals

As neuronal tissue does not fossilise, the formulation of
general principles on the evolution of the brain requires a
comparative analysis of cerebral organisation in living species
(and, to a lesser extent, the study of endocranial casts of fossil
specimens), based on the hypothesis that the characteristics
present in the current members of a phylogenetic radiation can
be explained more parsimoniously as being inherited from a
common ancestor. The earliest mammals have likely evolved
from mammal-like reptiles at the end of the Triassic over
200 million years ago, in the form of small-brained shrew-like
creatures that probably laid eggs, like present-day monotremes
(Kaas, 2011). Monotremes (prototherians), one of the three main
extant mammalian groups, diverged from therians around 166–186
million years ago, while the marsupial (metatherian) and placental
(eutherian) lineages are thought to have split around 147–160
million years ago (Bininda-Emonds et al., 2007; Phillips et al.,
2009).

The brain size of present-day mammals is extremely variable, ranging from <0.1 g in the Etruscan pygmy shrew to more than 9 kg in some large cetaceans (DeFelipe, 2011). In placentals, evolutionary processes have led to the emergence of large brains in several groups of species sometimes separated by a long independent phylogenetic history (Manger et al., 2013). These include a large proportion of whales (up to 9,200 g for the sperm whale) and dolphins (up to 2,900 g), elephants (up to 6,000 g), certain pinniped species (such as walruses or southern elephant seals ~1,200 g), and members of the genus *Homo* (see Figure 2). Modern *Homo sapiens*, with an average brain mass of 1,350–1,400 g (varying from 1,100 to 1,800 g), are a long way behind elephants and cetaceans, but can nevertheless claim first place among primates, since the largest brains of the great apes do not exceed 500–600 g (Tower, 1954; Jerison, 1973; Haug, 1987; Roth and Dicke, 2005; Neubauer et al., 2018). Differences in brain size in present-day *Homo sapiens* do not appear to have functional significance, since substantial variations can be observed between individuals with apparently similar intellectual abilities (DeFelipe, 2011). The idea that a larger absolute brain size should necessarily confer more complex cognitive abilities or greater behavioural flexibility is also challenged by observations that animals with similar brain weights, such as gorillas and oxen (~500 g) or elephant seals and some humans (~1,200 g), have different behavioural repertoires, or that species with relatively small brains, such as dogs (60 g), rats (2 g) and mice (0.5 g) in mammals or corvids (6–15 g) in birds, can demonstrate sophisticated behaviours (Kaminski et al., 2004; Olkowicz et al., 2016).

Another widely studied property is relative brain size. In
mammals, brain size and body size are closely correlated, with a

negative allometry. As a result, small species tend to have relatively
larger brains in proportion to their body size than large species.
In humans, for example, the brain represents around 2% of body
mass, whereas this ratio can reach 10% in shrews and small rodents
(Van Dongen, 1998; Roth and Dicke, 2005). It is this negative
scaling relationship that led Dubois to introduce the “coefficient of
cephalization,” later renamed the encephalization quotient (EQ), as
a suitable measure for comparing relative brain size across species
(Jerison, 1973). The EQ quantifies how much a species brain size
deviates from what is expected based on its total body mass, using
a standard species from the same taxonomic group as a reference.
When calculating EQs in mammals, using the cat as the standard,
humans emerge as the most encephalized species with an EQ of
around 6–7, meaning that their brains are more than six times
larger than expected. However, a high degree of encephalization is
not exclusive to humans. Dolphins like the Tucuxi or the white-
sided dolphin are not far behind humans with EQs around 4–
5, followed by capuchin monkeys with EQs ranging from 2.4 to
4.8. Then come species like gorillas and chimpanzees (EQ = 1.5–
3)—though often considered more cognitively able than capuchin
monkeys (Deaner et al., 2007), elephants (EQ = 1.1–2.4), and
rodents with relatively low EQ values of 0.5–1 (Jerison, 1973;
Marino, 1998, 2002; Roth and Dicke, 2005; Shoshani et al., 2006).
However, the ability to predict the cognitive abilities of a species
from EQ values remains quite limited, mainly due to the sensitivity
of this metric to the choice of the reference taxonomic group
and to the value of the exponent of the power law relating brain
size to body size (typically between ~0.55 and 0.8) used in the
various studies (Harvey and Krebs, 1990; Marino, 1998; Charpier,
2008).

## 3.2 Brain size in hominins

The cranial capacity of hominins has undergone a significant
increase over the past 3 million years, evolving from 450 cm³
in *Australopithecus* (a value similar to that of the great apes)
to approximately 1,350–1,500 cm³ in *Homo sapiens* and *Homo
neanderthalensis* (that went extinct ~40,000 years ago) (Figure 2A)
(Jerison, 1973; Holloway, 2015; Neubauer et al., 2018). This
cerebral expansion, particularly evident in *Homo* erectus (~2
million years ago), was initially closely linked to changes in body
weight and then progressed more independently over the last
500,000 years (Ruff et al., 1997; Hublin et al., 2015), explaining
the high EQ values of *Homo sapiens*. It is interesting to note
that *Homo floresiensis*, whose remains were discovered in the
Liang Bua cave on the island of Flores, represents an exception
to this brain size expansion in the *Homo* lineage. Despite its
ability to create sophisticated tools and perhaps to navigate,
*Homo floresiensis* (dated between ~100,000 and 50,000 years
ago) had unexpected morphological features such as a small
stature (~1 metre) and a small endocranial volume of around
430 cm³ (Balzeau and Charlier, 2016; Sutikna et al., 2016).
Similarly, *Homo naledi*, a new species recently discovered near
Johannesburg in South Africa, which coexisted with Neanderthals
and potentially with the first *Homo sapiens*, also possessed small
brain capacities ranging from 465 to 610 cm³ (Garvin et al.,
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 2</figcaption></figure>

Evolution of hominin brain size. (A) Evolution of hominin endocranial volume over time. Adapted with permission from Hublin et al. (2015). (B)

Differences in brain size and shape of a modern human (blue), a Neanderthal from *La Chapelle-aux-Saints* (red) and a chimpanzee (green), visualised by computer tomography. Adapted with permission from Neubauer et al. (2018, 2020).

2017). These fossil discoveries are profoundly challenging our knowledge of human diversity and the long-held idea of a continuous evolution towards ever-larger human beings with ever-more-developed brains.

The increase in size of the hominin brain over the course of evolution entails an increase in its energy cost. The metabolic requirements of a human brain are considerable: accounting for 50–55% of basal metabolism at birth, this proportion peaks at over 65% at the age of 4–5 years and remains high, at around 20%, in adulthood (Clarke and Sokoloff, 1999; Kuzawa et al., 2014). It is believed that the consumption of energy-rich foods like meat and marrow, and, later, their improved digestibility through cooking (Carmody and Wrangham, 2009), have enabled mothers to allocate more energy to their foetuses during pregnancy (and their newborns during nursing) and have thus favoured the development of larger brains (Martin, 1996). Thus, the large brains of early *Homo* may have emerged as an unintended by-product of a change in maternal diet, perhaps initiated by a modification in climate and available resources. Another hypothesis

suggests that a reallocation of energy to the brain may have been facilitated by a reduction in the size of other metabolically costly organs, such as the digestive system (Aiello and Wheeler, 1995). Finally, the social brain hypothesis proposes that the evolution of hominin encephalization could be the result of increasingly complex social demands in group-living species (Dunbar and Shultz, 2007).

Compared with chimpanzees and macaques (~40 and 70% brain growth in *utero*, respectively), a significant proportion of brain growth in humans occurs after birth. The size of the brain at birth is thought to be partly constrained by the anatomy of the woman's pelvis, whose dimensions are limited by biomechanical and postural factors associated with bipedalism (Hublin et al., 2015). From a size of around 400 cm³ at birth (~28% growth in *utero*), the brain of a young *Homo sapiens* undergoes rapid growth during the 1st year, by the end of which it reaches 50% of its adult size, finally attained at the age of 5–6 years (Leigh, 2004; DeSilva and Lesnik, 2006). This perinatal phase of brain growth is accompanied by a change towards a more globular shape, typical
of modern humans. This globularization process, which evolved progressively to reach the current variation between 100,000 and 35,000 years ago, is not observed in Neanderthals and chimpanzees (Figure 2B) (Bruner et al., 2003; Gunz et al., 2010; Neubauer et al., 2010, 2018).

### 3.3 The neocortical expansion

While a simple cortex is already present in the pallium of reptiles, the neocortex first appears as a complex multi-laminated structure in mammals (Nieuwenhuys, 1994; Rakic, 2009). Of modest proportion (20–48%) in small species of the three main radiations, such as platypuses, opossums, shrews and mice, it reaches considerable size in cetaceans and primates. Accounting for 75 to 84% (depending on the study) of the total mass or volume of the brain, the human neocortex is proportionally one of the largest among mammals. Humans are however closely followed (and sometimes equalled) by most odontocete cetaceans (~72%), as well as several species of monkeys and apes, such as macaques (70–76%), grivets (79%), or chimpanzees (70–73%) (Pirlot and Nelson, 1978; Stephan et al., 1981; Hofman, 1988; Rilling and Insel, 1999; Manger, 2006). Within the neocortex, a pronounced enlargement of the frontal lobe, thought to be involved in higher cognitive functions, has long been regarded as a hallmark of human evolution. Brodmann (1912), shortly after completing his famous cytoarchitectural map of the cerebral cortex, published a comparative study of the frontal cortex surface in primates, demonstrating a progressive increase from prosimians to humans. While more recent studies have indeed demonstrated an increase in the absolute size of the frontal cortex in humans (Semendeferi et al., 1997, 2002; Bush and Allman, 2004), this expansion does not seem to significantly differ from what would be expected from a great ape with a human-sized brain (Semendeferi et al., 2002; Barton and Venditti, 2013).

Neocortex thickness generally correlates positively with brain size (Hutsler et al., 2005; Balaram and Kaas, 2014). However, this correlation does not uniformly apply to all taxa, as evidenced by the typically thin cortex (<2 mm) of cetaceans (Ridgway and Brownson, 1984). The average variation in cortical thickness between species (between 0.4 and 2.8 mm), which is comparable to the variability found between cortical areas in the same animal, remains relatively modest compared to the variation in overall brain size. This suggests that the expansion of the neocortex in large-brained mammals is mainly the result of an increase in its surface area (rather than its thickness), often resulting in the formation of convolutions, particularly visible in large primates and cetaceans (Hofman, 1985, 1988; DeFelipe, 2011 for review). In primates, a gradual increase in neocortical thickness is observed from primary to more integrative sensory areas, a trend seemingly absent in motor and frontal association cortices (Wagstyl et al., 2020). Finally, the relative thickness of cortical layers also varies between species, with supragranular layers being proportionally thicker in primates than in carnivores and rodents,

while infragranular layers show an inverted profile (Hutsler et al., 2005).

## 4 Intrinsic organisation of the neocortex

### 4.1 Areas and columns

The mammalian neocortex is typically subdivided into six layers defined by vertical differences in the size, shape, or density of neurons (Brodmann, 1909). There are, however, variations in the number, thickness or overall cytoarchitectonic organisation of the layers across the cortical mantle (Kaas, 1987; DeFelipe, 2011), which have formed the basis of its subdivision into distinct regions.

The neocortex is classically regarded as a complex mosaic of anatomically and functionally specialised areas whose number increases with brain size (Brodmann, 1909). From about 10 to 15 cytoarchitectonic subdivisions mainly dedicated to sensory processing (primary somatosensory, visual, and auditory areas) and motor functions (although controversy remains over a clear separation of somatosensory and motor regions in some early mammals) in small-brained species (Krubitzer et al., 1995; Catania et al., 1999; Kaas, 2011), their number could approach 200 in humans (Glasser et al., 2016). In large-brained species, primary sensory and motor fields subdivide—more than 10 to 20 areas identified for the single visual cortex in cats and monkeys—, change in size and relative position and become separated by the inclusion of associative areas notably in the frontal and temporoparietal regions (Nieuwenhuys, 1994; Northcutt and Kaas, 1995). The small amount of cortical territory devoted to multimodal or association areas in monotremes suggests that unimodal sensory fields could constitute the core of the prototypical plan for neocortical organisation in mammals (Krubitzer et al., 1995). The developmental mechanisms responsible for this elaborate cortical parcellation have been debated as to whether the structural differences between areas are induced in a homogeneous population of cortical neurons by the patterned activity of thalamocortical projections, or whether the formation of the neocortical map is already genetically determined in the neural progenitors of the embryonic ventricular zone. In this later view, which seems to be gaining consensus, areas in the cortical plate would attract appropriate inputs rather than being specified by them. Activity-dependent mechanisms would then play an influential role at later stages in refining existing synaptic connexions (Rakic, 2002).

The predominance of vertical over horizontal connexions in his anatomical reconstructions of rodent cortical neurons, led Lorente de Nó (1938) to suggest in the 1930s that cortical areas were composed of multiple 'elementary units' of information processing taking the form of vertical bands of interconnected neurons. Almost 20 years later, Mountcastle obtained persuasive evidence of a columnar segregation of sensory modalities in the cat somatosensory cortex by showing that neurons recorded along different vertical microelectrode tracks responded either to superficial or deep cutaneous stimulation. He introduced the term 'cortical column', assigned them an average width of
~0.5 mm and demonstrated that the different functional columns were intermingled in the manner of a mosaic (Mountcastle, 1957). Columnar organisation formed by groups of neurons activated more strongly by stimulation of one of the two eyes (ocular dominance column) or by stimuli having a common receptive field axis orientation (orientation columns) were later discovered in the cat primary visual cortex (Hubel and Wiesel, 1963, 1969). Comparing data obtained in cats and macaques, Hubel and Wiesel (1963, 1974) found that similar variations in orientation tuning were obtained with smaller electrode advances in monkeys, suggesting thinner columns or less defined borders in this species. Variations in the width of ocular dominance columns (from 200 to 800 µm) were also reported in subsequent studies on different primate species including humans (Bugbee and Goldman-Rakic, 1983; Horton and Adams, 2005), finally leading to the introduction of a new entity, the minicolumn, whose iteration and lateral combination through short-range horizontal connexions would form the basis of functional columns. Developmentally, minicolumns reflect the radial migration of neurons from the proliferative ventricular zone into narrow (30–50 µm) translaminar chain of cells separated by neuropil (Buxhoeveden and Casanova, 2002; Rakic, 2002). According to the “radial unit hypothesis,” the surface expansion of the neocortex during mammalian evolution (by ~10,000 times from shrews to the largest cetaceans; Hofman, 1985; Manger, 2006), with no comparable variation in its thickness, could result from a change in the genetic mechanisms that control the timing and/or mode of cell division in the ventricular zone, leading to an increase in the pool of founder cells at the origin of radial columns (Rakic, 1995; Chenn and Walsh, 2002).

Anatomical and functional evidence for a modular organisation of the neocortex has been obtained in a wide range of species from different mammalian radiations. Alternating bands of corticocortical projections related to monoaural or binaural responses are observed in the cat primary auditory cortex (Imig and Adrián, 1977), and patchy arrangements of axon terminal fields are apparent in the auditory area of the short-beaked echidna (Dann and Buhl, 1995). An additional example is the discrete architectonic units, known as “barrels,” formed by neurons preferentially activated by the same facial whisker in the primary somatosensory cortex of rodents and several other mammals with whiskers (Woolsey and Van der Loos, 1970). In the platypus somatosensory area, regions where neurons respond only to cutaneous stimulation of the bill are separated from regions where neurons process both tactile and electrical inputs (Krubitzer et al., 1995). Most frequently observed in primary sensory systems, the presence of columns is also attested in primary motor and association cortices (Bugbee and Goldman-Rakic, 1983; Amirikian and Georgopoulos, 2003). The existence of relatively similar organisational patterns in various areas and species led to idea that modular units could represent a fundamental principle of cortical function in mammals, important for perception, cognition and memory (Eccles, 1981; Mountcastle, 1997). In this context, it is expected that the subdivision of cortical regions into iterated computational units capable of operating in parallel should increase the number of possible spatio-temporal combinations of activity, and hence the processing capacities of large brains. However, the concept of cortical columns has also been contested based on an apparent intra- and inter-species

inhomogeneity in size, shape, and expression without obvious differences in cortical function. For example, ocular dominance columns are well defined in Old World monkeys and remain rudimentary in most New World monkeys (Hendrickson et al., 1978; Adams and Horton, 2003), despite similar visual abilities. Similarly, barrels are not found in all the marsupial species that possess whiskers, and some rodents, like the chinchilla, have barrel fields without engaging in whisking behaviour (Purves et al., 1992). These findings raise the possibility that cortical modules may have emerged in different forms during areal specification in mammals, without acquiring an obvious function in all species (Horton and Adams, 2005).

## 4.2 Neurons and synapses in numbers

The mammalian neocortex contains approximately 15–25% of the total number of brain neurons (Azevedo et al., 2009; Herculano-Houzel, 2012). Initial assumptions that cortical columns were composed of a constant number of neurons in all mammals (Rockel et al., 1980) have been challenged by subsequent studies showing, using stereological and non-stereological counting methods, variations in the density of neurons between species, areas and layers (DeFelipe et al., 2002; Herculano-Houzel et al., 2008). Neuronal density in the neocortex generally tends to be inversely correlated with brain volume, with different scaling rules applying to different orders of mammals. Thus, for a similar increase in neocortex mass, the corresponding decrease in neuronal density seems to be less pronounced in primates than in other placental mammals (Haug, 1987; Manger, 2006; Herculano-Houzel, 2012; Herculano-Houzel et al., 2014), and marsupials are reported to have fewer neurons than placentals of equivalent brain size (Haug, 1987; Seelke et al., 2014). The total number of cortical neurons in the human brain (12–16 billion) therefore exceeds that measured in other large-brained species such as whales or elephants (6–11 billion), but this number aligns with expectations for a primate with a human-sized brain (Haug, 1987; Azevedo et al., 2009; Herculano-Houzel et al., 2014). However, Pinson and colleagues recently discovered that expression of the modern human variant of transkelotase-like protein 1 (hTKTL1)—but not of the Neanderthal variant (which differs by a single amino acid substitution)—in the embryonic mouse neocortex can increase the abundance of a specific type of basal progenitors and promote neuron production, especially in the frontal lobe. These findings suggest that, even within primates, species with similar brain sizes, such as *Homo sapiens* and Neanderthals, may exhibit variations in the number of neurons (Pinson et al., 2022).

Differences in counting methods, variations in age and number of samples, or in the amount of cortical volume examined make it difficult to compare calculations of synaptic density between laboratories (DeFelipe et al., 2002). Nevertheless, most studies agree that the mean synaptic density in the adult (defined as the total number of excitatory and inhibitory synapses per unit volume of cortical tissue) do vary across species (between ~250 and 1,000 million/mm³), but relatively independently of brain size (see DeFelipe et al., 2002; Karbowski, 2014 for reviews). For instance, a recent comparative study conducted in 25 primate
species (including humans) found relatively constant synaptic densities in the primary visual and inferior temporal cortex of the different animals (~256 million/mm³), varying by only 1.9-fold despite brain weights differing by about 500-fold (Sherwood et al., 2020). Although a certain percentage of synapses continue to be remodelled in adulthood, synaptic density in the adult neocortex is globally stationary. This period of stable synaptogenesis is preceded by major changes in the rate of synapse production, which is particularly high during the perinatal period. The duration of this massive increase in synapse density around birth varies widely between mammals, ranging from 2 weeks in rats, 1 month in cats, 4 months in macaques, to around 3 years in humans (Bourgeois, 2008). The number of synapses is then maintained at a maximum until puberty (which is delayed in primates compared with rats and cats), during which synaptic density decreases markedly to levels comparable to those observed in adults (Huttenlocher, 1979; Bourgeois and Rakic, 1993; Bourgeois, 2008; Elston and Fujita, 2014). The maturation period for synaptic architecture is therefore considerably lengthened in primates, suggesting that the sensory environment could play an important role in the configuration and refinement of cortical circuits.

The number of synapses per neuron, usually estimated by dividing the synaptic density by the neuronal density in a given layer, positively correlates with brain volume. In primates, the overall number of synapses per neuron (including both excitatory and inhibitory cells) in the inferior temporal cortex is thus higher in humans (~4,850 synapses/neuron) than in gorillas (~3,550 synapses/neuron), chimpanzees (~2,885 synapses/neuron), and macaques (~2,160 synapses/neuron) (Sherwood et al., 2020). However, this positive scaling does not universally apply to all species, as sensory cortex neurons in mice are reported to have more synapses than in rats (DeFelipe et al., 2002). The ratio of synapse density to neuron density remains a relatively coarse measure of connectivity because it does not differentiate between different types of neurons and overlooks the fact that dendrites, particularly those of pyramidal neurons, generally span several layers. A more accurate estimate of the number of synapses received by a given neuron could perhaps be obtained by quantifying the spine density along small dendritic segments (assuming that each dendritic spine is contacted by at least one synaptic input) and extrapolating these measurements to a cumulative number of spines, considering the length of the different dendritic compartments. Such analyses revealed that the density of spines on pyramidal neurons from the supragranular layers of the temporal cortex is higher in humans than in macaques (1.35 times), marmosets (1.9 times), or mice (1.3 times) (Elston et al., 2001; Benavides-Piccione et al., 2002). Based on these calculations and measures of total dendritic length, the total number of synapses received by a human temporal cortex L2/3 pyramidal cell has been estimated to be around 20,000 (Eyal et al., 2018).

## 4.3 Constituent cell types and functional microcircuit organisation

Cortical circuit computations rely on the dialogic interaction of two main classes of neurons: the spiny glutamatergic excitatory

neurons (comprising pyramidal and stellate cells), processing and transmitting information within and/or outside the neocortex, and the smooth or sparsely spiny GABAergic inhibitory interneurons, which finely regulate synaptic activity of local populations of excitatory neurons, shaping network dynamics.

The following sections will primarily address the structural characteristics of the pyramidal neuron, accounting for ~70-80% of the total population of neocortical neurons in placental mammals. Qualified as the “psychic cells” of the brain by Santiago Ramón y Cajal, pyramidal neurons are distributed across all cortical layers (except L1, where they still extend dendrites), and are regarded as the cornerstone of the cortical microcircuitry. The typical eutherian mammalian pyramidal neuron is distinguished by its prominent apical dendrite, radially oriented towards the pia, and its skirt of basal dendrites radiating from the soma (Figure 3). Pyramidal cells can be broadly classified as intratelencephalic (IT) or extratelencephalic (ET), depending on whether their long-range axons are confined to telencephalic structures (such as the neocortex, striatum, or claustrum) or whether they additionally establish connexions with brain structures outside the telencephalon (thalamus, tectum, pons, spinal cord). IT neurons are distributed throughout layers 2 to 6, while ET cells are confined to the deeper layers 5-6 (Harris and Shepherd, 2015; Baker et al., 2018a for reviews). IT neurons are the sole source of interhemispheric connexions, conveyed through the anterior commissure in monotremes and marsupials, as well as through the corpus callosum in eutherians (Suárez et al., 2018). Spiny stellate cells, lacking a prominent apical dendrite and instead featuring a star-like dendritic arbour, are predominantly localised in L4 of primary sensory cortices. Below I present an overview of the organisation of cortical circuits, outlining the main classes of neurons and their input-output connectivity patterns. This description is mainly based on findings obtained in eutherian mammals (in particular rodents, cats, and monkeys), with attempts to draw comparisons with the monotreme and marsupial literature where feasible. I will not cover here the properties of cortical astrocytes, which are now recognised as key contributors to various neuronal functions, including synaptic transmission, energy metabolism, and ion homeostasis. However, investigating their diversity and morpho-functional features within the main mammalian groups represents a promising direction for future research, given the reported variations in the number or size of protoplasmic astrocyte processes between humans and rodents, as well as the specific presence of certain astrocyte types in primates (see Oberheim Bush and Nedergaard, 2017 for review).

### 4.3.1 Upper-layer pyramidal neurons in eutherians

L2/3 pyramidal neurons, a subset of IT neurons, play a pivotal role in intra-cortical information processing through their local and long-range corticocortical connexions. These neurons receive inputs from specific thalamic nuclei on their basal dendrites, either directly or *via* ascending projections from L4 in sensory cortices or from upper L5 in cortices lacking a distinct granular layer, while non-specific thalamocortical and distant cortical inputs mainly terminate on their tuft branches in L1. L2/3 pyramidal neurons make numerous reciprocal connexions within their home column,
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 3</figcaption></figure>

Variability and evolution of pyramidal neuron morphology in mammals. (A) Database of reconstructed human temporal cortex L2/3 neurons, classified according to their somatic depth, indicated in µm at the top of each cell. Two examples of cells whose soma was located 791 (top) and 1182 (bottom) µm from the cortical surface are enlarged on the left. Adapted with permission from Deitcher et al. (2017). (B) Examples of supragranular (L2/3, top) and infragranular (L5, bottom) pyramidal neurons from the visual (L2/3) and motor (L5) cortices of the short-beaked echidna, the primary motor cortex of Benett's wallaby, the sensorimotor cortex of the American opossum, the primary motor cortex of the northern giraffe, the primary somatosensory cortex of the Sprague-Dawley rat, the primary motor cortex of the chacma baboon and the human temporal cortex. Adapted from Dann and Buhl (1995) (echidna L2/3); Hassiotis and Ashwell (2003) (echidna L5), Jacobs et al. (2018) (wallaby, baboon, giraffe), Boyer et al. (2022) (rat L2/3), Mahon and Charpier (2012) (rat L5), Deitcher et al. (2017) (human L2/3), and Kalmbach et al. (2021) (human L5). Neurons were redrawn from the sources mentioned. Scale bars (100 µm) are species-specific and apply to supra- and infragranular neurons. Estimates for monotreme-therian divergence and marsupial-placental separation are taken from Bininda-Emonds et al. (2007) and Phillips et al. (2009).
mostly on upper basal and apical oblique dendrites. Locally, L2/3 ITs send prominent descending axonal projections to L5 pyramidal cells (Weiler et al., 2008; Lefort et al., 2009; Petreanu et al., 2009; Harris and Shepherd, 2015). This robust output to L5 has been identified as an essential feature of neocortical microcircuitry, preserved in most regions and species (Thomson and Lamy, 2007; Weiler et al., 2008; Hooks et al., 2011). Long-range axons of supragranular pyramids establish connexions with ipsi- and contralateral cortical regions and the striatum (Petreanu et al., 2007; Anderson et al., 2010; Pidoux et al., 2011a).

L2/3 pyramidal neurons show substantial regional and inter-
species variation in their dendritic architecture. In primates, L2/3
ITs from higher integrative frontal cortices generally display a more
extensive and branched basal dendritic tree than their counterparts
from primary and secondary sensory areas (Elston and Rosa, 1998;
Elston et al., 2001; Jacobs et al., 2001; Gilman et al., 2017; Galakhova
et al., 2022). A similar size increase in basal arborization along the
caudal-rostral axis has been reported in elephants (Jacobs et al.,
2011) and rodents (Benavides-Piccione et al., 2006; Elston et al.,
2006), although with less pronounced regional differences (Mohan
et al., 2015; Gilman et al., 2017). A cross-species comparison
indicates that upper-layer neurons in frontotemporal regions of
macaques and humans have a larger total dendritic length (on
average 1.5-fold for macaques and 3-fold for humans) and greater
branching complexity than homologous neurons in mice (Mohan
et al., 2015; Gilman et al., 2017), whereas such differences are not
observed in primary visual cortices (Gilman et al., 2017). When
comparing mammals with large brains, the length of the basilar
dendritic arborization in elephants is reported to be slightly longer
in both frontal cortex (~7%) and occipital cortex (~3%) than
in humans, despite a lower degree of branching in the former
species (Jacobs et al., 2011).

Traditionally considered as a homogeneous cell population,
there is increasing evidence for depth-dependent differences in the
morpho-functional properties of L2/3 pyramidal cells in rodents
(Brecht et al., 2003; Lühke et al., 2003; Staiger et al., 2015)
and for the presence of neuronal subclasses distinguished by
the expansion of their apical dendritic arborization, as observed
in the rat medial prefrontal cortex (van Aerde and Feldmeyer,
2015). This morphological diversity of L2/3 pyramidal neurons
appears to be even more pronounced in humans, with a significant
increase in the extent of the horizontal field span of the apical
tree, length of the basal arborization and mean radius of the
cell body with increasing distance from the pia (Figure 3A)
(Deitcher et al., 2017; Berg et al., 2021). In addition, recent RNA-
sequencing studies have revealed the existence of two additional
transcriptomically defined subtypes of pyramidal neurons in deep
human L3, apparently absent in mice (Hodge et al., 2019; Berg et al.,
2021).

The vast majority (70-95%) of excitatory synaptic inputs
target the dendritic spines of neocortical pyramidal neurons
(Nieuwenhuys, 1994). The elongated dendritic trees in multimodal
and association cortices often correlates with an increase in spine
density, particularly evident in frontal regions in primates (Elston
et al., 2001; Jacobs et al., 2001). However, this trend does not
hold true for all species. For examples, pyramidal neurons in
the prefrontal cortex of the marmoset have fewer branches and
spines than those in the temporal lobe (Elston et al., 2001),

and the density of spines in the macaque prefrontal cortex
does not exceed that observed in different regions of the mouse
neocortex (Gilman et al., 2017). The length of dendritic spines
(~1.3 µm combining neck and spine head) does not seem to
significantly change with cortical size (Karbowski, 2014), despite
a slight tendency for spines in the human temporal cortex to
have longer necks (0.9 vs. 0.7 µm) and larger heads (0.6 vs.
0.4 µm²) compared to those in mice (Benavides-Piccione et al.,
2002). Finally, in line with the idea that a dynamic balance
between excitatory and inhibitory activities is a fundamental
principle of cortical circuit function in physiological conditions,
the ratio between excitatory (~70-90%) and inhibitory (~10-
30%) synapses appears globally conserved in mammals, although
laminar-dependent differences within and between species can
be observed (for reviews DeFelipe et al., 2002; Karbowski,
2014).

4.3.2 Deep-layer pyramidal neurons in eutherians

Infragranular pyramidal neurons integrate inputs from virtually all neocortical layers thanks to their elongated apical dendrite and radiating basilar arborization. They in turn significantly influence cortical and subcortical operations through local connectivity and long-range output projections. L2/3 inputs to L5 cells are distributed along the dendritic tree, mainly on tuft branches, apical oblique and basal dendrites. Afferents from L4 mostly terminate on basal dendrites, which also receive axons from primary relay thalamic nuclei. Additionally, L5 pyramidal cells receive thalamocortical projections from higher-order thalamic nuclei on their apical tuft in L1 and basal dendrites (Weiler et al., 2008; Petreanu et al., 2009; Hooks et al., 2011). L5 ITs establish many reciprocal connexions and provide synaptic inputs to L5 ETs. Connexions from ETs to ITs are less numerous (Morishima and Kawaguchi, 2006; Brown and Hestrin, 2009; Kiritani et al., 2012); ET intracortical projections mainly contributing to inter-areal communications (Nelson et al., 2013; Ueta et al., 2013; Harris and Shepherd, 2015). Most of inputs to L6 ITs in sensory cortices originate from local deep-layer neurons, while L6 ETs are primarily innervated by axons from higher-order cortical areas (Zhang and Deschênes, 1998; Mercer et al., 2005; Feldmeyer, 2012; Vélez-Fort et al., 2014).

Although IT and ET neurons are distributed across L5 and L6,
they display laminar-dependent projection patterns. For instance,
corticostriatal neurons projecting to ipsilateral and/or contralateral
striatum are found throughout L5 (Anderson et al., 2010; Pidoux
et al., 2011a), while corticospinal neurons seem to be confined to
the deeper part of L5 (Anderson et al., 2010; Suter et al., 2013),
and corticothalamic neurons predominate in L6 (Bourassa and
Deschênes, 1995). Corticothalamic neurons from sensory areas
typically project back to their primary relay thalamic nuclei, but
those located in the deeper part of L6 may also project to higher-
order thalamic nuclei (Bourassa and Deschênes, 1995; Chevee et al.,
2018).

The two subclasses of infragranular pyramidal neurons differ
in their apical dendritic architecture, with great variability existing
within each subpopulation in all species (for review, see Baker
et al., 2018a). Traditionally, L5 ET neurons possess a more complex
apical dendritic arborization with numerous branches and a crown-
shaped tuft that unfolds close to the pial surface (Figure 3B),
whereas the apical dendritic tuft of IT neurons is more restricted
with fewer side branches (Hattox and Nelson, 2007; Ramaswamy
and Markram, 2015; Kalmbach et al., 2021). Morphological
heterogeneity is also present within L6; L6 ETs exhibit a relatively
compact apical dendritic arborization predominantly terminating
in narrow tufts in L4, while corticocortical L6 neurons extend
an untufted or sparsely tufted apical dendrite, rarely extending
beyond L4-L5 border. By contrast, the apical dendrite of the
corticoclaustral IT neurons in L6 can reach the lower boundary
of L1 (Katz, 1987; Zhang and Deschênes, 1997; Kumar and
Ohana, 2008; Oberlaender et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2022).
Consistent with inter-areal variations observed in superficial
layers, infragranular pyramidal cells from higher processing
areas possess a more elaborate basal dendritic arborization in
the macaque (Elston and Rosa, 2000). Despite the difficulty
of unambiguously identifying ET neurons in humans (based
on their axonal projections), a transcriptomic cell class sharing
multiple distinctive marker genes and morphological attributes
with the murine ET neuron subtype (Tasic et al., 2016) has
been identified in different regions of the human neocortex,
despite a relative lower abundance as compared to monkeys and
rodents (Hodge et al., 2019; Bakken et al., 2021; Kalmbach et al.,
2021).

Certain subpopulations of ET neurons, with morphological
features that deviate from the archetypal pyramidal neuron, are
endemic to certain cortical areas and species. For instance, the
corticospinal gigantopyramidal neuron (Betz cell in primates),
with its very large cell body and extensive basilar dendrites, is
exclusively found in the primary motor cortex of carnivores and
primates (reviewed in Jacobs et al., 2018). The same applies to
the large von Economo neuron, which is characterised by its
spindle-shaped soma and thick, poorly branched apical and basal
dendrites. Initially described in human anterior cingulate and
frontoinsular cortices, they were first considered to be specifically
human and identified as particularly prone to early loss and
morphological alterations in various neuropsychiatric disorders
(reviewed in Butti et al., 2013). Their existence, with similar cortical
distributions and in fairly comparable numbers, was subsequently
demonstrated in other large-brained species such as great apes,
elephants and certain cetaceans, although their presence in non-
primate mammals is still debated (Butti et al., 2013; Banovac et al.,
2019).

### 4.3.3 Pyramidal neurons in marsupials and monotremes

Pyramidal neurons have been clearly identified in both
marsupials and monotremes (Figure 3B), but a detailed analysis
of their dendritic architecture and synaptic connectivity is
still lacking (marsupials: Walsh and Ebner, 1970; monotremes:
Dann and Buhl, 1995; Tyler et al., 1998; Elston et al., 1999;
Hassiotis and Ashwell, 2003; Hassiotis et al., 2005; Jacobs et al.,
2018).

Several key features of the eutherian pyramidal cell are retained
in marsupials, including their presence throughout layers 2 to 6,

an upward-projecting apical dendrite, elaborate basilar dendritic
arborization, and recurrent excitatory synaptic connexions. Some
variations, such as the more common bifurcation of apical
dendrites into daughter branches, were however observed in
wallabies, quokkas, and opossums, but not in dunnarts (Walsh
and Ebner, 1970; Tyler et al., 1998; Jacobs et al., 2018). Our
knowledge on neuronal classes in monotremes is still limited
but the few existing studies suggest that pyramidal neurons in
the short-beaked echidna represent a smaller proportion (35-
50%) of the total population of cortical neurons compared
to therian species. In addition, a substantial number of these
pyramidal neurons (30-40%) display atypical attributes such
as apical dendrites lacking a terminal bouquet or branching
close to the soma, and poorly developed basal dendritic skirts.
Monotreme pyramidal cells also appear to have a lower density
of spines on apical and/or basal dendrites. However, the
morphology of the different types of non-pyramidal neurons
(spiny stellate cells and inhibitory interneurons) is very similar
in monotremes, marsupials, and placentals. These observations
led Hassiotis and colleagues to put forward the hypothesis that
pyramidal and non-pyramidal neurons may have emerged as
distinct morphological entities in the first mammals, while the
entire set of typical pyramidal cell features would have appeared
shortly after the split with the prototherian lineage, around 180
million years ago (Hassiotis and Ashwell, 2003; Hassiotis et al.,
2005).

In summary, the morphology of eutherian pyramidal neurons
appears more diverse than previously thought, even within
a single cortical area of a given species (see, for example,
Figure 3A). Furthermore, it is interesting to note that the early
bifurcation of apical dendrites in marsupials and monotremes
is an anatomical feature that is also commonly observed
in some placental species, such as hedgehogs or elephants
(Valverde and Facal-Valverde, 1986; Jacobs et al., 2011). Thus,
the canonical and non-canonical aspects of pyramidal cells seem
to have been relatively well preserved during cortical evolution;
a better understanding of neuronal properties in clades close
to the root of the mammalian phylogenetic tree will help to
clarify whether morphological heterogeneity is indeed greater
in these species and whether it could translate into different
cortical functioning.

### 4.3.4 GABAergic interneurons

Neocortical GABAergic interneurons constitute a highly
heterogeneous set of cells that differ in their morphology,
input-output connectivity, intrinsic electrophysiology, and
expression of molecular markers such as calcium-binding proteins
and neuropeptides. Although a consensus classification of
interneurons is still debated (Ratliff and Batista-Brito, 2020),
available data suggest a grouping into four main subclasses
based on distinct immunohistochemical profiles. These include
interneurons expressing the calcium-binding protein parvalbumin
(PV), the neuropeptide somatostatin (Sst), and the ionotropic
serotonin receptor 5HT3a (5HT3aR), with the 5HT3aR group
being further divided into two subgroups based on vasoactive
intestinal peptide (VIP) expression. Each of these molecularly
identified subclasses encompasses several interneuron types,
primarily defined by specific morpho-functional properties (Ascoli et al., 2008; Rudy et al., 2011; Tremblay et al., 2016). The different interneurons target preferential subcellular domains on neighbouring pyramidal neurons, presumably mediating specific functions within the cortical microcircuit. For instance, within the PV-positive group, fast-spiking basket cells mostly synapse on somatic and proximal dendritic regions, while chandelier (axo-axonic) cells innervate the axonal initial segment. In addition to their local axonal arborization, Sst-expressing Martinotti interneurons project to superficial layers, where they inhibit apical tuft dendrites. The vast majority of 5HT3aR/VIP cells located in superficial cortical layers have a bipolar-like dendritic morphology and vertically extending axons that exert a translaminar inhibitory influence on the basal dendrites of pyramidal cells, although they preferentially form synapses onto other interneurons. Finally, the 5HT3aR/non-VIP neurons mainly target dendrites of local pyramids via their dense axonal plexus (neurogliaform cells) or provide a perisomatic inhibition (5HT3aR/non-VIP, cholecystokinin-positive cells) (for comprehensive reviews, see Markram et al., 2004; Tremblay et al., 2016; Lourenço et al., 2020). Recent work combining analysis of transcriptomes, intrinsic electrical properties, and morphological features of GABAergic interneurons from the mouse visual cortex, has further refined the interneuron classification system, revealing an even greater diversity of cell types (Tasic et al., 2018; Gouwens et al., 2020).

Following Ramón y Cajal (1917)'s belief that "the functional superiority of the human brain is intimately bound up with the prodigious abundance and the unusual wealth of forms of the so-called neurons with short axon", neuroanatomists have long speculated about an increased diversity of inhibitory interneurons in the primate brain (Nieuwenhuys, 1994). There is now growing evidence that the main subclasses of interneurons are shared by the three mammalian lineages, with substantial similarities in their anatomical and physiological properties. For instance, key features of neurogliaform interneurons described in rodents, including genetic marker expression, morphological characteristics, firing patterns, and neuromodulation, are conserved in macaques and humans (rodent: Tamás et al., 2003; rodent and primate: Oláh et al., 2007; Povysheva et al., 2007; Poorthuis et al., 2018), despite a seemingly higher intrinsic excitability in primates (Povysheva et al., 2007; Poorthuis et al., 2018). Species vary, however, in the overall percentage and laminar distribution of interneurons, as well as in the relative proportion of different subtypes (Fairén and Regidor, 1984; Kawaguchi and Kubota, 1997; Tyler et al., 1998; Hof et al., 1999; Hassiotis and Ashwell, 2003; Zaitsev et al., 2005; Krienen et al., 2020). Immunochemical and transcriptomic studies estimate the percentage of inhibitory interneurons in the neocortex to be approximatively 15% in rodents, compared to an average of 20-30% in humans, monkeys, and cetaceans (Glezer et al., 1993; DeFelipe et al., 2002; DŽaja et al., 2014; Krienen et al., 2020; Bakken et al., 2021).

Some interneurons subtypes appear specific to certain species. Originally described by Ramón y Cajal in the human neocortex, calbindin-positive double bouquet cells, characterised by long-descending bundles of highly varicose axonal collaterals

(the so-called “horse-tail” neurons), are mostly found in primates and, to a lesser extent, in carnivores (Ballesteros-Yáñez et al., 2005; DeFelipe et al., 2006). Even though neurons with radially oriented dendritic and/or axonal arborizations that resemble horse-tail neurons have been described in other placental and marsupial mammals (Somogyi and Cowey, 1984; Kawaguchi, 1995; Tyler et al., 1998), they display a less laterally confined axonal plexus with fewer varicosities in these species. Finally, a recent study has identified a group of L1 interneurons in humans distinguished by a specific immunochemical profile and anatomical features, including a compact bushy axonal arborization and large rosehip-shaped axonal boutons. These “rosehip cells,” which predominantly target the apical dendrites of pyramidal cells, are well positioned to modulate distal dendritic computation (Boldog et al., 2018).

### 4.3.5 The sensory cortical microcircuit

In the late 1980s, the observation of similarities in the composition and distribution of cortical neurons between species gave rise to the idea that a common canonical microcircuit might exist in mammals (Douglas et al., 1989; Douglas and Martin, 2004). Although the multidimensional nature of connectivity schemes rules out the possibility of a single cortical circuit, comparative analysis of the data accumulated in placental mammals does suggest the presence of shared principles of organisation and function (see Silberberg et al., 2002; Douglas and Martin, 2004; Thomson and Lamy, 2007; Harris and Shepherd, 2015 for reviews). The key stages in the integration of sensory input across cortical layers are described below, drawing primarily on research in rodents and cats.

Sensory inputs from primary thalamic relay nuclei are routed to the cortex *via* modality-specific channels. These thalamocortical projections predominantly terminate on L4, but also at the boundary between L5 and L6. For their part, axons from higher-order thalamic nuclei primarily target L1 and L5, while avoiding L4 neurons (Thomson and Lamy, 2007; Petreanu et al., 2009; Constantinople and Bruno, 2013; Harris and Shepherd, 2015). L4 is considered as the main thalamorecipient layer and the starting point of intracortical sensory processing. L4 principal neurons comprise two types of glutamatergic cells: spiny stellate and star pyramidal cells, which have broadly similar functional properties but vary in proportion between areas and species. In rodents, spiny stellate cells are abundant in the primary somatosensory cortex, but rare in the visual cortex (Peters and Kara, 1985; Feldmeyer, 2012). Conversely, these cells are prevalent in the primary visual cortex of cats, monkeys and humans, while remaining sparse and randomly distributed among pyramidal cells in the auditory cortex (Lund, 1984; Meyer et al., 1989; Smith and Populin, 2001; Nassi and Callaway, 2009). Stellate cells are also found in the dunnart (Tyler et al., 1998) and in the echidna, where they exhibit a relatively wider distribution spanning L3 and L5 (Hassiotis and Ashwell, 2003).

L4 spiny neurons receive dense intracortical excitatory inputs (Schubert et al., 2003; Thomson and Lamy, 2007; Lefort et al., 2009), which likely enhance the gain and duration of thalamocortical responses to ensure a robust representation of
sensory information (Lien and Scanziani, 2013; Li L. Y. et al., 2013; Li Y. T. et al., 2013). In the primary visual cortex of the cat, most of the glutamatergic connexions onto L4 spiny neurons originate from other L4 neurons and L6 pyramidal cells, whereas thalamocortical afferents account for only about 6% of the total synaptic contacts in L4 (Ahmed et al., 1994). The proportion of thalamocortical inputs to spiny neurons is larger in the mouse somatosensory cortex, reaching an average of ~16% of excitatory inputs (Benshalom and White, 1986). Thalamic projections also terminate on L4 GABAergic interneurons, resulting in powerful feedforward inhibition (Cruikshank et al., 2007) that timely regulates the firing of excitatory cells and contributes to stimulus selectivity (Miller et al., 2001; Wilent and Contreras, 2005). An interesting example of consistency in sensory input processing across phylogenetically distant species is provided by studies on the short-tailed opossum, which show striking similarities in the pattern of thalamocortical connectivity and in the whisker-evoked synaptic responses of L4 neurons with those observed in mice and rats, despite the absence of barrels in these marsupials (Dooley et al., 2015; Ramamurthy and Krubitzer, 2016).

From L4, sensory signals propagate to the upper layers *via* the prominent axonal projections between L4 spiny neurons and L2/3 pyramidal cells (Feldmeyer et al., 2002; Lefort et al., 2009). L2/3 ITs represent the second level of intracortical processing, distributing information within and beyond their home column through local and long-range corticocortical outputs. Depending on the behavioural context, sensory signals in L2/3 are further modulated by the integration of non-sensory information from other primary and/or associative cortical areas and from the thalamus (Feldmeyer, 2012; Harris and Shepherd, 2015). *In vivo* recordings revealed relatively low spontaneous and evoked firing rates in superficial pyramidal neurons, at least in rodents (de Kock and Sakmann, 2008; Sakata and Harris, 2009; O'Connor et al., 2010; Carton-Leclercq et al., 2023). This sparse firing, likely resulting from a hyperpolarized membrane potential keeping neurons away from their action potential (AP) threshold (Lefort et al., 2009; Carton-Leclercq et al., 2023) and from the recruitment of local inhibitory interneurons (Helmstaedter et al., 2008; Meyer et al., 2011; Haider et al., 2013), suggests that sensory information in superficial layers are encoded through the patterned discharge of fine-scale assemblies of neurons ("sparse coding") (Harris and Mrsic-Flogel, 2013). Supporting this notion, preferential connectivity between L2/3 cells dedicated to processing of related sensory information has been observed in rodent and cat primary visual cortex (Gilbert and Wiesel, 1989; Yoshimura et al., 2005; Ko et al., 2011), and spatially constrained firing activity has been recorded in response to modality-specific sensory stimulation in the superficial layers of the mouse auditory and somatosensory cortex (Sakata and Harris, 2009; O'Connor et al., 2010).

Deep-layer neurons, which in rat, cat, and primate receive major inputs from L2/3 (reviewed in Thomson and Lamy, 2007), represent the last stage of signal processing within the cortical microcircuit. Engaged in complex computations, these

cells combine the results of the successive integrations within the cortical column with converging long-range thalamic and cortical inputs to finally route the output message to specific sets of cortical and subcortical structures. L5 pyramidal neurons, particularly ET cells, exhibit a depolarized membrane potential and rather high spontaneous and sensory-evoked firing frequency *in vivo* (de Kock and Sakmann, 2008; Sakata and Harris, 2009; O'Connor et al., 2010; Carton-Leclercq et al., 2023), consistent with the dense excitatory inputs they receive and their more variable inhibitory innervation (Schubert et al., 2001; Thomson and Lamy, 2007; Petreanu et al., 2009; Feldmeyer, 2012). This suggests that the deep layers of the neocortex may employ a coding strategy based on global variations in firing rates ('dense coding') rather than on the implementation of discrete spatio-temporal dynamics of activity as in the superficial layers (Harris and Mrsic-Flogel, 2013).

Unlike L5 ETs, L6 corticothalamic cells fire at low rate *in vivo*, even in response to various sensory stimuli (Sirota et al., 2005; O'Connor et al., 2010; Oberlaender et al., 2012). Through their projection to the thalamus and to L4, where they innervate GABAergic interneurons strongly in cats but more moderately in rats and mice, L6 corticothalamic cells are strategically positioned to modulate thalamocortical inputs (Thomson, 2010; Pichon et al., 2012). This was demonstrated in the mouse primary visual cortex, where optogenetic stimulation of corticothalamic neurons was shown to modulate the spiking level of upper-layer neurons, *via* the activation of intracortical and intrathalamic inhibitory circuits (Olsen et al., 2012). Moreover, by integrating long-range inputs from higher-order cortical areas, these cells are likely involved in the contextual processing of sensory signals (Zhang and Deschênes, 1998; Feldmeyer, 2012; Vélez-Fort et al., 2014).

Overall, these findings suggest that the fundamental principles governing the functioning of cortical circuits are retained in the different eutherian species studied to date. It would be important to extend this research to a larger number of species, possibly from different mammalian radiations, to assess the extent to which these principles can be generalised to all mammals. Sensory processing in neocortical circuits sharing a relatively similar hodology may be differentially modulated during behaviour. In the mouse visual cortex, visually driven sensory responses in L2/3 pyramidal cells are scaled up as mice transitioned to locomotion (Niell and Stryker, 2010; Polack et al., 2013). This state-dependent facilitation of visual responsiveness has also been observed in monkeys during attention, and even in invertebrate species such as fruit flies during walking or flight (reviewed in Maimon, 2011). Conversely, in the mouse auditory cortex, active behaviour diminishes the gain of tone-evoked spiking responses in superficial layers (Zhou et al., 2014). Similar investigation in humans have produced heterogeneous results, with some studies showing a positive effect of exercise or natural walking on sensory gain and peripheral input processing (Bullock et al., 2015; Cao and Handel, 2019), while others report no modulation of visual sensitivity during treadmill walking (Benjamin et al., 2018).
# 5 Electrophysiological properties of pyramidal neurons

Synaptic potentials generated in the dendrites propagate to the soma and the proximal part of the axon, where they trigger APs when the voltage threshold is reached. The transduction of synaptic inputs into AP-encoded outputs depends not only on synaptic function, but also on the intrinsic membrane properties of neurons that shape the amplitude and kinetics of synaptic events and adjust their ability to elicit firing. Previous research in rodents has shown that the morphology of dendritic trees, together with their electrical properties, strongly influences synaptic integration, excitability, and firing patterns of pyramidal neurons (Mainen and Sejnowski, 1996; Yuste and Tank, 1996; Bekkers and Häusser, 2007; van Elburg and van Ooyen, 2010). This raises the question of whether such morpho-functional interactions are applicable to other species or whether the distinctive anatomical attributes of human neurons confer specific electrophysiological properties. Comparative analysis of the electrical properties of pyramidal neurons between species, and even within the same species, based on *in vitro* studies carried out by different laboratories can prove difficult due to the many experimental factors (e.g., the animal age, composition of intracellular and extracellular solutions, recording temperature or degree of damage to the dendritic tree during slices preparation) that vary from one study to another and are known to affect the synaptic and biophysical properties of neuronal membranes (Hardingham and Larkman, 1998; Zhu, 2000; Bekkers and Häusser, 2007). The task becomes even more complex when considering *in vivo* studies, as the background synaptic activity that characterises intact brain preparations is known to have a significant impact on the excitability and firing of cortical neurons (Destexhe et al., 2003; Altwegg-Boussac et al., 2014; Carton-Leclercq et al., 2021). The increase in the number of data sets and the integration of work combining experiments carried out on several species in a single study have nevertheless enabled a number of electrophysiological characteristics to be compared reliably.

## 5.1 Intrinsic membrane properties

### 5.1.1 L2/3 pyramidal neurons

The intrinsic excitability of a neuron, which reflects its endogenous capacity to generate APs in response to a given input, is determined by its passive membrane properties, largely conferred by its physical structure, and by its array of non-synaptic voltage-gated ion channels, which mediate a variety of active currents.

According to the cable theory, the passive properties of the dendritic tree are predicted to impose a distortion on synaptic inputs, such that the most distal inputs will yield the most attenuated and prolonged excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) at the soma (Rall, 1977; Spruston et al., 1994). Simultaneous somatic and apical dendritic whole-cell recordings from human and rodent L2/3 pyramidal neurons, together with morphologically realistic biophysical modelling, confirmed that somatic EPSP amplitude progressively decreased with increasing distance from the EPSP generation site (Mohan et al., 2015; Eyal et al., 2018; Gooch et al., 2022), and demonstrated that

voltage attenuation followed a similar distance-dependence pattern in both species (Figure 4A) (Gooch et al., 2022). The extended and elaborate apical dendritic tree of human pyramidal cells is thus expected to result in strong attenuation of the most distal synaptic inputs. It has been proposed that the cable filtering of human dendrites may be partially compensated for by a lower specific membrane capacitance (~0.5 µF/cm² vs. ~1 µF/cm² in rodent neurons), a biophysical characteristic expected to increase the amplitude and reduce the peak delay of dendritic EPSPs at the soma (Eyal et al., 2016). However, this finding has not been confirmed by recent *in vitro* recordings of L2/3 (Gooch et al., 2022) and L5 (Beaulieu-Laroche et al., 2018) pyramidal cells, suggesting possible heterogeneity in the capacitive membrane properties of human neurons.

In a passive neuronal model, distal EPSPs are expected to exhibit greater somatic temporal summation due to their greater half-width at the soma compared to more proximal EPSPs. However, trains of EPSPs generated at dendritic and somatic sites have been shown to summate similarly in human L2/3 pyramidal neurons (Gooch et al., 2022). This could result from a stronger dendritic expression of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels mediating the h-current ($I_h$), which is known to reduce the duration of distally generated synaptic events in rat L5 neurons (Williams and Stuart, 2000). Although the spatial distribution of h-channels in L2/3 human neurons remains so far unknown, their presence was evidenced by a pronounced voltage sag (a slow partial repolarization) in response to long hyperpolarizing current pulses delivered at the soma (Deitcher et al., 2017; Kalmbach et al., 2018; Berg et al., 2021; Moradi Chameh et al., 2021), and further supported by *in-situ* hybridisation and single nucleus RNA sequencing studies (Zeng et al., 2012; Kalmbach et al., 2018). Sag ratio values (quantifying the amount of $I_h$) in human supragranular pyramids (11–17%) (Deitcher et al., 2017; Kalmbach et al., 2018) are comparable to those reported in macaques (12–15%) (Zaitsev et al., 2012; González-Burgos et al., 2019), but contrast sharply with their low levels (0.3–2.5%) in homologous neurons in rodents (Figure 4C) (Mason and Larkman, 1990; Larkum et al., 2007; Kalmbach et al., 2018; Berg et al., 2021; but see the relatively large sag ratio reported by van Aerde and Feldmeyer, 2015 in a subpopulation of rat L3 pyramidal cells and by Testa-Silva et al., 2022 in some L2/3 mouse neurons).

The influence of distal dendritic inputs on AP output in human L2/3 neurons is therefore limited by the expansion of their apical dendritic tree and the impact of $I_h$ on the time course of synaptic potentials. However, recent studies indicate that, similar to rodent neurons (Larkum et al., 1999, 2007; Schiller et al., 2000), human dendrites can initiate local dendritic spikes mediated by voltage-sensitive Na⁺ or Ca²⁺ channels, or dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, which can increase EPSP amplitude and drive firing at the axon initiation site (Figure 4B) (Gidon et al., 2020; Gooch et al., 2022; Testa-Silva et al., 2022). This suggests that active dendritic electrogenesis could provide a means to compensate for the normalisation of temporal summation and strong voltage attenuation of EPSPs in these neurons. The ability of human neurons to generate NMDA spikes in basal and oblique dendrites was, however, found to be significantly lower than in mouse neurons, probably due to the larger diameter of
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 4</figcaption></figure>

Intrinsic membrane properties of L2/3 pyramidal neurons. (A) Simultaneous somatic (Soma, black) and dendritic (Dend., blue) recordings of an EPSP generated at dendritic site by the injection of uniform current waveform (Inj. current, bottom traces) in a human and a rat temporal cortex L2/3 pyramidal neuron. The location of recording electrodes is shown on the reconstructed neurons. The right graph compares the degree of dendro-somatic (D-S) voltage attenuation of simulated EPSPs as they spread from their increasingly remote apical dendritic site of generation to the soma, in human (filled symbols) and rat (open symbols) neurons. (B) Evoked dendritic spikes (asterisks) driving somatic AP firing in human and rat L2/3 neurons. (C) Voltage responses to hyperpolarizing current steps recorded from a mouse temporal association cortex (left) and a human middle temporal gyrus (right) L2/3 pyramidal neuron. Double arrow indicates the amplitude of the voltage sag. (D) Example voltage responses to depolarizing current steps of +250 and +500 pA for a representative mouse (left) and human (right) L2/3 pyramidal neuron. (E) From top to bottom, Current-evoked firing responses recorded from a rat medial prefrontal cortex, a macaque prefrontal cortex, and a human temporal cortex L2/3 pyramid. Adapted with permission from Gooch et al. (2022) (A, B); Kalmbach et al. (2018) (C, D); van Aerde and Feldmeyer (2015) (rat), González-Burgos et al. (2019) (rhesus monkey), and Deitcher et al. (2017) (human) (E).

human dendrites (Testa-Silva et al., 2022). Other work on human neurons has reported briefer apical dendritic Ca²⁺ spikes compared with rodents (Gidon et al., 2020), while a recent study suggested conversely that suprathreshold dendritic integrative operations were conserved between the two species (Gooch et al., 2022). These observations indicate that further research is required to gain a comprehensive picture of how the active properties of human dendrites differ from those of other species.

The ability of EPSPs to initiate firing also depends on the excitability of the somatic membrane. Somatic excitability is generally assessed by measuring the current firing threshold, which is the minimum current of fixed duration required to trigger an AP (an approximation of the rheobase; Lapicque, 1926). This threshold current depends on a combination of membrane parameters, including the resting membrane potential, input resistance (which

governs the capacity of a current to modify the membrane potential according to Ohm's law), and the value of the AP voltage threshold. In rodents, removal or occlusion of the dendritic tree increases the intrinsic excitability of individual neurons by increasing input resistance and lowering the AP threshold (Bekkers and Häusser, 2007). Such interactions between dendritic morphology and neuronal excitability seem directly transposable to other species, since pyramidal neurons in the superficial layers of the frontal cortex of the rhesus monkey, which have an elaborate dendritic tree, show reduced somatic excitability compared with their less branched counterparts in the primary visual cortex. Likewise, morphologically related pyramidal neurons, such as those in the visual cortex of mice and monkeys, show similar threshold current values (Amatrudo et al., 2012; Gilman et al., 2017). Finally, a direct comparison of the excitability of human and mouse L2/3
neurons in the same study revealed that human pyramids had a significantly lower input resistance and required the injection of a greater amount of current to be brought to spike (Figure 4D) (Kalmbach et al., 2018; Testa-Silva et al., 2022).

The properties of single somatic APs in L2/3 pyramidal neurons are essentially similar across species: the amplitude (~80–85 mV), voltage threshold (~40/–50 mV) and half-width duration (~1.0–1.7 ms) measured in humans (Testa-Silva et al., 2014; Deitcher et al., 2017; Moradi Chameh et al., 2021; but see Gooch et al., 2022 for a difference in AP voltage threshold between human and rodent neurons) are well within the ranges reported for monkeys (Amatrudo et al., 2012; Zaitsev et al., 2012; Gilman et al., 2017) and rodents (Lefort et al., 2009; Staiger et al., 2015; Gilman et al., 2017). However, the properties of APs during spike trains may distinguish rodent from human neurons. In particular, human APs have faster onsets than those fired by mouse pyramidal neurons (Testa-Silva et al., 2014). As predicted by theoretical analyses (Ilin et al., 2013), this could enable human neurons to track and encode fast incoming synaptic inputs more efficiently (Testa-Silva et al., 2014; Goriounova et al., 2018). The axon initial segment of human L2/3 pyramids is similarly equipped with a high density of voltage-dependent Na⁺ channels, with a partially segregated distribution of Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 channel subtypes in proximal and distal regions, as observed in rodents (Hu et al., 2009; Tian et al., 2014). Finally, the main firing dynamics identified in human cortical neurons in response to sustained depolarizing current steps (Foehring et al., 1991; Avoli et al., 1994; Deitcher et al., 2017; Kalmbach et al., 2018; Moradi Chameh et al., 2021): regular spike trains with moderate spike frequency adaptation, preceded in some neurons by an initial doublet or triplet of high-frequency spikes, are also commonly observed in the supragranular cortex of monkeys, cats, and rodents (Figure 4E) (rat: Mason and Larkman, 1990; Otsuka and Kawaguchi, 2011; Staiger et al., 2015; van Aerde and Feldmeyer, 2015; cat: Chen et al., 1996; Nowak et al., 2003; monkey: Zaitsev et al., 2012; González-Burgos et al., 2019).

### 5.1.2 L5 pyramidal neurons

Important differences in subthreshold and suprathreshold intrinsic membrane properties distinguish ET from IT neurons in rodents (Figures 5A, B). Across areas, ET neurons typically exhibit a slightly more depolarized resting membrane potential, lower input resistance, faster membrane time constant and higher threshold current, and frequently (but not always) display reduced input-output gain (assessed by the slope of the relationship between injected current intensity and firing frequency) (Figure 5A) (Mason and Larkman, 1990; Hattox and Nelson, 2007; Dembrow et al., 2010; Oswald et al., 2013; Suter et al., 2013; Rock and Apicella, 2015; Anastasiades et al., 2018; Baker et al., 2018b; Kalmbach et al., 2021; but see Groh et al., 2010 for regional variations in biophysical parameters differentiating IT from ET neurons). These properties are largely conserved in human and non-human primates, where ET-like cells are found to be less excitable than their slender neighbours, both at rest and during integration of inputs of varying intensity (Figure 5A) (Beaulieu-Laroche et al., 2018, 2021; Bakken et al., 2021; Kalmbach et al., 2021; Moradi Chameh et al., 2021). Across species, the excitability of L5 ETs

generally correlates negatively with their size, such that thick-tufted pyramidal neurons of the Etruscan shrew are more easily driven to fire APs than their counterparts in rodents, macaques and humans (Beaulieu-Laroche et al., 2018, 2021; Bakken et al., 2021; Kalmbach et al., 2021) (Figure 5C). However, variations between ET and IT projection subtypes in a given species often appear to be greater than differences between species, at least for temporal cortex neurons (Kalmbach et al., 2021). Consistent with findings in other placental mammals, ET cells in humans have a more prominent voltage sag (~25–30% sag ratio) than IT neurons (~15%), associated with a progressive increase in h-channel density with increasing distance from the soma (Figure 5D) (Kole et al., 2006; Beaulieu-Laroche et al., 2018, 2021; Kalmbach et al., 2021; Moradi Chameh et al., 2021). The differences in the amount of $I_h$ between the two subtypes of L5 neurons are expected to contribute to their specific passive membrane properties and to shape their subthreshold integrative properties, like in rodents where h-channels impart ET neurons with a less pronounced temporal summation of EPSPs than in IT cells (Dembrow et al., 2010; Sheets et al., 2011; Kalmbach et al., 2015; Anastasiades et al., 2018). When activated by sustained depolarization, primate and rodent L5 ET neurons show less frequency adaptation (progressive increase in the inter-spike interval during a train of APs) than IT cells (Figure 5A). Individual APs in ETs also exhibit faster kinetics, shorter duration and a lower voltage threshold (Figures 5A, B) (rodent and primate: Bakken et al., 2021; Beaulieu-Laroche et al., 2021; Kalmbach et al., 2021; rodent: Mason and Larkman, 1990; Hattox and Nelson, 2007; Dembrow et al., 2010; Oswald et al., 2013; Suter et al., 2013; Pathak et al., 2016). The thinner APs of L5 corticofugal neurons could limit calcium influx and activation of calcium-dependent potassium channels responsible for spike frequency adaptation during AP trains (Faber and Sah, 2003), and thus contribute to their more regular firing pattern (Suter et al., 2013).

Compared to L5, the intrinsic parameters that discriminate ET and IT populations in L6 are more difficult to identify. While some studies describe L6 ET neurons as having faster time constants, shorter APs and higher rheobase than IT cells as in L5 (Kumar and Ohana, 2008; Crandall et al., 2017), others report lower threshold currents, longer APs (Kinnischtzke et al., 2016), as well as higher input resistance values (Kinnischtzke et al., 2016; Crandall et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2022). However, weaker steady-state adaptation ratios and relatively larger voltage sags are biophysical properties that also consistently separate ETs from ITs in L6 (Kumar and Ohana, 2008; Vélez-Fort et al., 2014; Crandall et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2022; but see Cotel et al., 2018).

A significant proportion (~10–30%) of L5 ET neurons in cats and rats can fire in bursts (clusters of APs with short inter-spike intervals riding on a depolarizing envelope) in response to threshold current injections (rodent: Chagnac-Amitai et al., 1990; Mason and Larkman, 1990; Dégenètais et al., 2002; Paz et al., 2009; Groh et al., 2010; cat: Baranyi et al., 1993; Nuñez et al., 1993; Nowak et al., 2003). This firing behaviour is nonetheless not unique to ETs as burst firing can be observed *in vivo* and *in vitro* in L5 corticostriatal neurons in rodents (Yang et al., 1996; Pidoux et al., 2011b), and to a lesser extent, in the upper layers of sensorimotor and visual cortices in cats (Nishimura et al., 2001; Nowak et al., 2003). The traditional classification of L5 pyramidal
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 5</figcaption></figure>

Intrinsic membrane properties of L5 pyramidal neurons. (A, B) Electrophysiological properties of infragranular ET and IT neurons in rat medial prefrontal cortex (top) and human temporal cortex (bottom). (A) Representative voltage responses of ET (green) and IT (red) neurons to depolarizing current steps of increasing intensity (left), and corresponding relationships between injected current intensity and number of evoked spikes (right). (B) Example APs in ET and IT neurons and corresponding summary data of their voltage threshold and half-width duration. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. in the top graph. Box plots in the bottom graph denote the median and 25–75th percentiles. (C) Input-output function of thick-tufted L5 neurons across placental mammalian species. Left, Firing frequency as function of injected current intensity in Etruscan shrew, mouse, rat, rabbit, macaque, and human neurons. Lines illustrate population medians. Two-photon images of example somas are shown on top. Right, Population data of somatic surface area (mean ± s.e.m.), current firing threshold (median and 25–75th percentiles), and input-output neuronal gain (median and 25–75th percentiles). (D) h-channel-related membrane properties of L5 thick-tufted neurons. The graphs illustrate the sag ratio as a function of distance from the soma in mouse, rat, rabbit, and human neurons. Triangles represent somatic medians and lines are exponential fits. (A, B) are adapted with permission from Dembrow et al. (2010) (rat) and Kalmbach et al. (2021) (human), and (C, D) are adapted with permission from Beaulieu-Laroche et al. (2021).

cells into regular spiking or intrinsically bursting subtypes is further complicated by the fact that firing dynamics evolve *in vivo* with the level of background synaptic activity, which is function of vigilance state and behaviour (Mahon et al., 2001; Steriade, 2004; Altwegg-Boussac et al., 2014). Across species, *in vivo* recordings generally describe L5 ETs as more spontaneously active than ITs and more

prone to generate spike bursts (monkey: Pasquereau and Turner, 2011; rat: Ushimaru and Kawaguchi, 2015; Rojas-Piloni et al., 2017; Saiki et al., 2018), in stark contrast to the sparse spiking activity of L6 corticothalamic neurons (rabbit: Swadlow, 1989; cat: Sirota et al., 2005; rat: Oberlaender et al., 2012). Burst firing is suggested to be less frequent in human and non-human primates than in
rodents and carnivores (Avoli and Olivier, 1989; Foehring et al., 1991; Chang and Luebke, 2007; Beaulieu-Laroche et al., 2018, 2021; Moradi Chameh et al., 2021; Piette et al., 2021). This reduced bursting capacity of human neurons could result from an increased electrical isolation of distal dendrites due to their length (Beaulieu-Laroche et al., 2018, 2021), which is expected to limit electrical coupling between the different neuronal compartments and, thus, the influence of dendritic spikes on somatic output (Larkum et al., 1999, 2001; Williams and Stuart, 1999). However, such a decrease in calcium dendritic electrogenesis in humans was not reported by another study (Kalmbach et al., 2021), suggesting variability in the ability of human dendrites to trigger regenerative potentials, as in rodents (Helmchen et al., 1999; Fletcher and Williams, 2019). As postsynaptic bursts are thought to influence synaptic integration, plasticity, and information signalling in cortical circuits (Lisman, 1997; Larkum et al., 1999; Williams and Stuart, 1999), the lower intrinsic burst capacity of human neurons could appear as disadvantageous to cortical computations. Alternatively, as suggested by theoretical studies, electrically isolated individual dendrites could function as separate processing units, increasing the possibilities for independent parallel operations and thus, the computational capabilities of cortical neurons (Häusser and Mel, 2003; Eyal et al., 2018).

ET and IT pyramidal neurons also differ in their responses to neuromodulatory transmitters (for reviews, see Shepherd, 2013; Dembrow and Johnston, 2014; Radnikow and Feldmeyer, 2018). For instance, cholinergic inputs are more effective at promoting persistent spontaneous firing in deep-layer corticofugal neurons than in corticocortical cells (Dembrow et al., 2010; Joshi et al., 2016; Baker et al., 2018b), an effect likely involving inhibition of M-current mediating $K^+$ channels and activation of non-specific cationic conductances (Baker et al., 2018b). Similarly, the increase in cortical excitability induced by activation of alpha2-noradrenergic receptors is significantly reduced in ITs compared with ETs (Dembrow et al., 2010). The responsiveness of pyramidal neurons to dopaminergic and serotoninergic afferents also varies according to their projection targets, owing to the differential expression of neuromodulator receptor subtypes (Avesar and Gulledge, 2012; Gee et al., 2012). Given the critical roles of neuromodulatory systems in regulating sleep, wakefulness, motor control, and various high cognitive functions such as conscious perception, attention, learning, and memory, a comprehensive knowledge of the neuromodulation of projection neuron subpopulations in humans will be essential for a cell-type-specific mechanistic understanding of numerous brain functions and dysfunctions, as well as for the development of potential treatments (Shepherd, 2013; Ma et al., 2018).

## 5.2 Excitatory synaptic function

Recent cutting-edge studies, combining whole-cell recordings of pairs of L2/3 pyramidal neurons with the identification of putative synaptic contacts, have begun to characterise excitatory synaptic transmission in the supragranular layers of the human neocortex. Despite potential differences in the capacity to form synaptic connexions, given the higher density of spines on

human neurons (Benavides-Piccione et al., 2002), the rate of local functional connectivity (around 12% in mice, 14% in rats, and 14% in humans) and the number of synapses per connexion (between ~2 and 4) are reported to be comparable between rodents and humans. This similarity extends to the median amplitude (~0.5 mV despite substantial differences between studies and cortical regions, see de Kock and Feldmeyer, 2023 for review), latency, and kinetics of unitary (evoked by the firing of single presynaptic neurons) EPSPs reaching the soma, which show remarkable consistency across a variety of species (human and mouse: Testa-Silva et al., 2014; Szegedi et al., 2016; Seeman et al., 2018; Campagnola et al., 2022; Hunt et al., 2023; mouse: Oswald and Reyes, 2008; Lefort et al., 2009; Ko et al., 2013; Jouhanneau et al., 2015; Luo et al., 2017; rat: Mason et al., 1991; Hardingham and Larkman, 1998; Holmgren et al., 2003; Yoshimura et al., 2005; Feldmeyer et al., 2006; Hardingham et al., 2010; macaque and rat: Povysheva et al., 2006; cat and rat: Thomson et al., 2002). It also predicted that a similarly small number of simultaneously active L2/3-L2/3 synapses (between ~125 and 145) is required to generate a somatic AP in human and rat cell models (Eyal et al., 2018). This maintenance of the fundamental properties of excitatory synaptic transmission between L2/3 human neurons, despite a strong voltage attenuation of dendritic EPSPs and lower somatic input resistance, could result from compensatory mechanisms, such as initiation of dendritic spikes (see above) and/or an increase in AMPA and NMDA synaptic conductances, as predicted by modelling studies (Eyal et al., 2018; Hunt et al., 2023). L2/3 pyramidal-to-pyramidal synaptic connexions in humans are, however, considered to be more reliable than in rodents, with a failure rate between functionally connected cells ranging from 0 to 8% compared with 3.2 to 25% in mice and rats (human: Szegedi et al., 2016; human and mouse: Hunt et al., 2023; mouse: Oswald and Reyes, 2008; Jouhanneau et al., 2015; rat: Hardingham and Larkman, 1998; Koester and Johnston, 2005; Feldmeyer et al., 2006; Hardingham et al., 2010).

Connexions between pyramidal cells and GABAergic interneurons generally produce larger synaptic responses than connexions between pyramidal cells, partly because of the higher input resistance of interneurons (rat and cat: Thomson et al., 2002; rat and macaque: Povysheva et al., 2006; rat: Holmgren et al., 2003; human: Molnár et al., 2008). The amplitude distribution of unitary EPSPs at this synapse often shows a long tail formed by large amplitude synaptic events, although this can also be observed at other types of connexions (Holmgren et al., 2003; Lefort et al., 2009). Interestingly, dual whole-cell patch clamp recordings in the human neocortex have identified a subset of supragranular pyramidal cells establishing particularly strong synapses on fast-spiking interneurons and producing excitatory events large enough to drive postsynaptic firing and initiate a complex sequence of polysynaptic activity in the local network (Molnár et al., 2008; Szegedi et al., 2016). The properties of human inhibitory synapses and their impact on local circuit function are still not fully established. Nevertheless, the consistency of long-lasting inhibitory responses elicited by neurogliaform interneurons in rodent and human L2/3 pyramidal neurons (Tamás et al., 2003; Oláh et al., 2007), along with the comparable facilitatory effect of acetylcholine on Martinotti cell-mediated lateral inhibition in both species (Obermayer et al., 2018), suggest that these interneuron
subtypes may similarly modulate synaptic input processing at distal dendrites in humans.

Synaptic function in human L5 is just beginning to be uncovered. The estimated rate of functional connectivity between L5 pyramidal neurons is similarly low (~10%) in humans and rodents (rat: Markram et al., 1997; Lefort et al., 2009; human: Seeman et al., 2018; Campagnola et al., 2022). Quantitative analysis of the structural correlates of synaptic transmission indicates that most L5 synaptic boutons in human temporal cortex present a single active zone comparable in size to those in L4 and L5B of the rat somatosensory cortex, despite substantial individual variability. The number of synaptic vesicles in the putative readily releasable pool of L5 neurons is similar in both species, but the resting pool is at least 2-fold larger in humans, which could facilitate rapid refilling of the releasable pool during sustained high-frequency activity (human: Yakoubi et al., 2019; rat: Rollenhagen et al., 2015, 2018). Finally, it is suggested that the mean amplitude of the unitary EPSP at the L5 pyramidal-to-pyramidal connexion (including ET and IT neurons) is comparable between species (~0.6 mV), but further human studies are needed to confirm these results (rodent: de Kock and Feldmeyer, 2023 for review; see also Lefort et al., 2009; Hardingham et al., 2010; Kerr et al., 2013; human: Seeman et al., 2018).

### 5.2.1 Plasticity of synaptic transmission

Connexions between L2/3 pyramidal cells generally exhibit frequency-dependent short-term synaptic depression *in vitro*. This rapid decrease in the amplitude of the postsynaptic response during trains of presynaptic spikes, primarily mediated by presynaptic mechanisms involving a progressive inactivation of $Ca^{2+}$ channels in synaptic terminals and reduction of the pool of readily releasable synaptic vesicles (Zucker and Regehr, 2002; Nanou and Catterall, 2018), can be similarly observed in humans, cats, and rodents (mouse and human: Testa-Silva et al., 2014; Campagnola et al., 2022; Hunt et al., 2023; mouse: Oswald and Reyes, 2008; Luo et al., 2017; but see Jouhanneau et al., 2015 for an overall stability of excitatory synaptic responses *in vivo*; rat: Holmgren et al., 2003; Koester and Johnston, 2005; Feldmeyer et al., 2006; cat: reviewed in Thomson and Lamy, 2007). However, human L2/3 excitatory connexions have been shown to recover faster from short-term depression than synapses in rodents, a property that is expected to increase information transfer within the cortical circuit (Testa-Silva et al., 2014; Campagnola et al., 2022; Hunt et al., 2023).

The timing-based learning rules governing the sign of long-term synaptic plasticity in L2/3 pyramidal cells diverge between humans and rodents. In juvenile rodents, pairing protocols in which an extracellularly-evoked EPSP precedes the current-evoked postsynaptic firing by a short time interval (pre-post intervals between 0 and +20 ms) typically induce long-term potentiation (LTP), whereas long-term depression (LTD) is triggered when the postsynaptic activity precedes the presynaptic stimulation for a broader range of time differences (pre-post intervals between 0 and -40 ms) (Feldman, 2000; Froemke and Dan, 2002). In contrast, LTP at adult human synapses is induced with a wider temporal window extending approximately from -100 to +5 ms, and LTD for pre-post intervals between +10 and +20 ms (Verhoog et al.,

2013). Differences in developmental stage (i.e., juvenile vs. adult) may partly explain this disparity, as the ability of excitatory synaptic connexions to produce LTD has been shown to decrease with age in rodents (Bananjee et al., 2009; Verhoog et al., 2013). Beyond these differences in timing rules, the layer-specific cholinergic regulation of long-term synaptic plasticity in the rodent neocortex seems to be retained in humans (Obermayer et al., 2017 for review). Importantly, the variable firing patterns of cortical neurons *in vivo* (Shadlen and Newsome, 1998; O'Connor et al., 2010) are expected to give rise to multiple and complex spike-timing interactions between pre- and post-synaptic neurons, further complicating the rules for plasticity induction (Sjöström et al., 2001).

## 6 Temporal organisation of cortical activity

In an intact brain, individual neurons defined by their specific intrinsic membrane properties interact synaptically to give rise to the ongoing *in vivo* dynamics of cortical circuits (Llinás, 1988). Depending on the behavioural context, mammalian neurons can form cell assemblies of different sizes capable of generating oscillatory activities at various frequencies (Steriade, 2000; Buzsáki and Draguhn, 2004). These self-organised patterns of activity play a crucial role in determining the global functional state of the brain and contribute to a range of executive and cognitive functions, including selection of input signals, sensorimotor integration, regulation of information transfer across distributed networks, motor action, and contextual formation and storage of subjective percepts (Engel et al., 2001; Salenius and Hari, 2003; Buzsáki and Draguhn, 2004; Fries, 2015).

By carefully placing electroencephalographic (EEG) electrodes on the skulls of rabbits and dogs, Caton (1875) was the first to discover, in 1875, that a living brain constantly generates fluctuating electrical activity, even in the absence of sensory stimulation or motor activity. A few decades later, the German psychiatrist Berger (1929), secretly conducting human EEG recordings at night in the basement of his university, understood that this ongoing cerebral activity was temporally structured in the form of oscillations whose amplitude and frequency depended on the behavioural or mental state, and introduced the idea that a given cerebral state could be defined by a specific profile of EEG activity. Since the seminal works of Caton and Berger, EEG recordings have been widely used in a variety of mammals to characterise brain dynamics during the sleep-wake cycle and their disruption in neurological disorders (Uhlhaas and Singer, 2006).

### 6.1 Physiological rhythms of sleep and wakefulness

#### 6.1.1 Slow-wave sleep

All mammals examined so far exhibit some form of sleep, whose mean daily duration varies from 2 h in the African bush elephant to 20 h in the little brown bat (Siegel, 2022). High-amplitude, low-frequency (0.5-4.0 Hz) cortical oscillations are the most prominent pattern of electrical activity during the deep phases
of slow-wave sleep (SWS), a sleep state generally characterised
by behavioural quiescence, raised arousal threshold, reduced but
steady electromyographic, cardiac and respiratory activities, and
rapid reversibility to wakefulness (Blake and Gerard, 1937; Jouvet,
1967).

Extracellular and intracellular recordings in cats and
rodents have shown that EEG slow waves result from
the rhythmic alternation between prolonged periods of
membrane depolarization and firing, and episodes of silence
and hyperpolarization in large ensembles of cortical neurons
(Steriade et al., 1993a; Sanchez-Vives and McCormick, 2000;
Mahon et al., 2001, 2006; Chauvette et al., 2011). This slow
cortical rhythm and associated behavioural correlates are largely
conserved in placental mammals (Figure 6A). However, while
slow oscillations typically occur bilaterally in terrestrial mammals,
cetaceans (whales and dolphins) spend 70-90% of their sleep time
in unihemispheric SWS; a unique cortical state where one cerebral
hemisphere exhibits slow-wave EEG, while the other shows
wake-like EEG activity (Figure 6B) (Lesku et al., 2006; Lyamin
et al., 2008). During unihemispheric SWS, the eye contralateral to
the “asleep” hemisphere is usually closed and the eye contralateral
to the “awake” hemisphere remains open (Lyamin et al., 2004).
Cetaceans engaged in unihemispheric SWS can rest on the bottom,
float at the surface or swim slowly in a single direction, with
periodic fin movements aiding in posture stabilisation. It has been
suggested that the unusual phenomenology of cetacean sleep may
serve to maintain a certain level of motor activity, enabling them
to come to the surface to breathe, to remain alert to potential
threats, or for thermogenesis (Lyamin et al., 2008). Semi-aquatic
fur seals represent a remarkable variant of this adaptation to
environmental conditions, as they display large amounts of
bilateral high-voltage slow activity when sleeping on land and large
amounts of interhemispheric EEG asymmetry when sleeping in
water (Figure 6B) (Lyamin et al., 2018). The neural mechanisms
behind the lateralized nature of SWS in cetaceans remain a
mystery. While the reduced interhemispheric synchronisation of
SW activity in mammals with callosotomy or callosal agenesis
(Singer and Creutzfeldt, 1969; Nielsen et al., 1994; Mohajerani
et al., 2010) suggests that the relatively small corpus callosum of
cetaceans may be involved, such callosal reduction has not been
found in fur seals (Lyamin et al., 2008).

Polygraphic correlates of SWS in marsupials closely resemble
those of terrestrial placental mammals (Van Twyver and Allison,
1970; Zaid et al., 2022), despite variation in total sleep duration
or SWS proportion between species (Siegel, 2005). Monotremes
also show similar periods of quiet sleep with high-voltage EEG and
reduced motor activity, for 6 to 8 h per day (Figure 6A) (Siegel et al.,
1999; Siegel, 2022).

6.1.2 Paradoxical sleep

Episodes of rapid-eye-movement (REM) or paradoxical sleep usually follow periods of SWS. In marsupials and placentals, the slow, and globally synchronised EEG waves of the SWS are here replaced by rapid, low-voltage oscillations in the beta/gamma range (typically at 20–40 Hz) (Figure 6A) (Llinás and Ribary, 1993; Steriade et al., 1996, 2001; Zaid et al., 2022). These high-frequency cortical activities are accompanied by a regular

hippocampal theta rhythm observable in the overlying neocortex,
with variations in the duration and properties of theta periods
across species (Robinson et al., 1977; Cantero et al., 2003).
This sleep state is particularly intriguing because it combines
reduced perceptiveness of the external world and almost complete
muscular atonia with a high level of cerebral activity resembling
that of wakefulness, irregular cardiac and respiratory rhythms
and frequent phasic movements of the eyes and extremities
(ears, vibrissae, fingers, beak, tail) (Aserinsky and Kleitman, 1953;
Dement, 1958; Jouvet, 1967). Remarkably, this is also the period
when our dreams are most vivid and take on a fantastic character.
The sparse and often inconsistent reports of mammalian-like
REM sleep in fish, amphibians, and reptiles suggests that this
sleep state may have appeared with endothermy in birds and
mammals (Lesku et al., 2006; Hartse, 2011). Sometimes described
as a state of “heightened inward arousal,” one of the proposed
functions of REM sleep could be to prepare the brain to wake
up in a more alert state, thereby avoiding the poor sensory-
motor function and high vulnerability associated with waking up
during SWS, which would be detrimental for survival (Snyder,
1966).

Monotremes appear to have an unusual form of REM sleep (Siegel et al., 1998). In platypuses, sleep phases characterised by rapid eye movements and intermittent twitching of the beak and head are associated with moderate- or high-voltage EEG waves (Figure 6A) (Siegel et al., 1999). Such an EEG profile, associated with an irregular firing of brainstem neurons typical of REM sleep in placentals and marsupials, has also been observed in the short-beaked echidna (Siegel et al., 1996, 1998). However, these findings need to be confirmed, since another study conducted in the echidna has reported periods of REM sleep with EEG activities close to those described in therian mammals (Nicol et al., 2000). The daily duration of the REM sleep-like state in monotremes (~7.5 h/day; the platypus is reputed to have more REM sleep than any other mammal) exceeds that of marsupials (~4.4 h/day) and placentals (~2 h/day) (Siegel, 2022). Given that monotremes have a lower body and brain temperature (~31°C) as compared to other mammals (~35.5°C in marsupials and 37°C in placentals), it has been hypothesised that prolonged periods of REM sleep, which are associated with a warming of various brain regions (Wehr, 1992), may contribute to the maintenance of thermal conditions compatible with autonomic function and alert awakening (Siegel, 2022). It has also been suggested that the EEG characteristics of therian SWS and REM sleep may have evolved from a single, phylogenetically older sleep stage combining features of both states, and that cortical activation (fast and low-voltage cortical activity) during REM sleep may be a more recent acquisition (Siegel et al., 1998; Siegel, 2022).

To date, there is no unequivocal proof of the existence
of REM sleep in cetaceans. Behavioural signs typical of REM
sleep in terrestrial mammals (muscle twitches, erections in males,
eyelid movements) have been documented in several cetacean
species but do not appear to be specific to this sleep state.
However, it is possible that REM sleep episodes in cetaceans
are too short to be reliably recorded, or that REM sleep is
present in these species in a modified form (Lyamin et al.,
2008). Again, it is interesting to note that the average daily
amount of REM sleep in fur seals is much lower when they
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 6</figcaption></figure>

Conservation of sleep-wake EEG patterns across mammals. (A) Example traces of EEG activity recorded from a monotreme (platypus), a marsupial (dusky antechinus), and two placental (rat and human) species during active wakefulness (wake), deep stages of slow-wave sleep (SWS), and rapid eye movement sleep (REM). Note the similarity of morphology and frequency of EEG waveforms across species. A moderate-voltage EEG recording is illustrated for platypus REM sleep (see text). For each species, the EEGs in the three states of alertness are presented on the same scale. Data are adapted from Siegel et al. (1999) (platypus); Zaid et al. (2022) (dusky antechinus); Mahon et al. (2006) (rat); Stickgold and Walker (2010), Liu and Dan (2019) (human). (B) Bilateral EEG recordings (L: left, R: right) from a semi-aquatic northern fur seal during SWS, showing bilateral high-voltage slow waves when animals are sleeping on land (BSWS, top) and unihemispheric slow-wave activity when sleeping in the sea (USWS, bottom). Belugas spend most of their sleeping time in a unihemispheric SWS (right). Adapted with permission from Lyamin et al. (2018) (fur seal) and Lyamin et al. (2008) (beluga).

sleep in the water than when they sleep on land (Lyamin et al., 2018).

### 6.1.3 Wakefulness

Cortical activity during wakefulness continuously varies according to the level of attention, the behavioural context or overall motor activity. As first demonstrated by Hans Berger and Edgar Adrian, alpha-frequency oscillations (7–12 Hz) appear on the EEG during quiet wakefulness (especially when eyes are closed) and predominate in posterior brain regions in primates and carnivores (Berger, 1929; Adrian and Matthews, 1934; Lopes da Silva et al., 1973; Bollimunta et al., 2008). Not all human beings are equally endowed with an occipital alpha rhythm and a small proportion of individuals even show an EEG almost entirely devoid of alpha waves after childhood (Niedermeyer, 1997). A second form of alpha oscillations, occurring at 7–20 Hz (also known as alpha-type mu rhythm), is observed in the frontal and parietal regions of rodents and cats, as well as in the central regions of humans, during periods of motor idleness preceding the completion of a sensory-motor

task (Gastaut, 1952; Rougeul et al., 1972; Buzsáki et al., 1988; Pfurtscheller et al., 1996).

The transition from quiet to active wakefulness (i.e., associated with motor activity, attentional or behavioural processes) is manifested by a clear change in the EEG pattern in most cortical areas. This is characterised by a decrease in the proportion of cortical waves below 10 Hz, replaced by activities in the beta and gamma frequency bands (mainly in the 20–60 Hz range). These fast rhythms reflect changes in the ongoing subthreshold synaptic activity of cortical pyramidal neurons, which undergo a slight depolarization and shift from relatively slow and large oscillations to fast and small-amplitude synaptic potentials. The impact of membrane depolarization on cell firing varies by layer and cortical region, with pyramidal neurons in deeper layers showing a more pronounced increase in firing rate (reviewed in Poulet and Crochet, 2019). High-frequency activities are a hallmark of active waking in placentals (Steriade, 2003; Buzsáki et al., 2013), marsupials (Van Twyver and Allison, 1970; Zaid et al., 2022), and monotremes (Figure 6A) (Siegel et al., 1996, 1999), although the latter two groups have been less extensively studied. Cortical activity during waking is regulated by several groups
of neurons that release neuromodulatory substances, including acetylcholine, noradrenaline, histamine, and serotonin, among others. These neurons are active during wakefulness, while their firing is reduced or suppressed during SWS (Lin, 2000; Jones, 2005). Notably, ascending cholinergic inputs from the basal forebrain and pontine tegmental nuclei play a prominent role in promoting and maintaining arousal through direct effects on the excitability and activity of cortical cells, and indirectly, by activating thalamocortical glutamatergic neurons (Metherate et al., 1992; Steriade et al., 1993a,b; Pinto et al., 2013; Eggermann et al., 2014). High-frequency oscillations during sensory processing arise from small neural networks of interconnected inhibitory and pyramidal cells (Buzsáki and Wang, 2012), but locally generated gamma activities can transiently synchronise over long distances during periods of heightened attention or conscious perception in primates (Melloni et al., 2007; Gregoriou et al., 2009). One well-documented mechanism for preserving the frequency of physiological rhythms and their inter-areal coherence in brains of different sizes is the scaling of the diameter of a fraction of myelinated axons. This scaling is expected to accelerate the propagation of APs in large brains, ensuring that homologous brain regions in different species can communicate within roughly the same time frame (reviewed in Buzsáki et al., 2013).

## 6.2 Pathological oscillations in epileptic and dying brains

If coordinated spatio-temporal activity patterns are the basis of normal brain functioning, their disruption is expected to lead to functional abnormalities. Indeed, Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, epilepsy and certain forms of coma are all examples of pathologies whose clinical symptoms are associated with disturbances in cortical oscillatory activities (reviewed in Uhlhaas and Singer, 2006). Although there is substantial literature on a variety of brain disorders, I will focus here on two examples of abnormal neural synchronisation: spike-wave discharges in absence epilepsy and the altered cortical patterns observed in the dying brain.

### 6.2.1 Absence epilepsy

Childhood absence epilepsy, an epileptic syndrome characterised by recurrent generalised non-convulsive seizures, provides an interesting example of disturbed brain dynamics identifiable in several mammals, with fairly similar behavioural consequences. Typical absence seizures involve brief episodes of impaired consciousness, manifested by a sudden interruption of voluntary sensory-motor behaviour, staring, unresponsiveness and retrograde amnesia of the epileptic episode. Secondary clinical symptoms, such as automatisms or mild clonic movements of the eyes, eyelids, mouth or limbs, are also commonly observed. Occurring frequently, up to hundreds of times a day, these seizures can interfere with the normal cognitive and psychosocial development of children (Blumenfeld, 2005a; Cavanna and Monaco, 2009; Crunelli et al., 2020). Absence seizures result from abnormally synchronised oscillations in corticothalamic-cortical

networks, evident as high-amplitude spike-waves at 3-4 Hz on human EEG (Depaulis and Charpier, 2018; Crunelli et al., 2020). Numerous investigations of absence seizure patient populations using high-density EEG recordings, MEG and functional MRI have demonstrated that epileptic oscillations are initiated in a circumscribed region of the neocortex before their generalisation (Holmes et al., 2004; Westmijse et al., 2009; Bai et al., 2010). The severity of clinical symptoms has been shown to correlate with the duration, intensity and inter-regional coherence of spike-wave discharges (Blumenfeld, 2005b; Guo et al., 2016).

Spike-waves are observed not only in humans, but also in monkeys (Steriade, 1974), cats (Gloor and Fariello, 1988), and ferrets (Youngblood et al., 2015), where they have a similar frequency. The cortically-initiated spike-waves in rodents exhibit a relatively faster frequency of 5-10 Hz, despite similar behavioural correlates (altered sensory responsiveness, behavioural arrest, vibrissae or jaw muscle twitching, occasional chewing) and pharmacological sensitivity to anti-absence medications (Polack et al., 2007, 2009; Depaulis et al., 2016; Jarre et al., 2017). The reason for the higher frequency of spike-wave oscillations in rodents is not yet well understood, but experimental and theoretical work has proposed that it may involve species differences in the prevalence of GABAergic receptor subtypes affecting the duration of the oscillatory cycle (Destexhe, 1999; Destexhe et al., 1999; Sanchez-Vives et al., 2021). Consistent findings in cats and rats show that these abnormal oscillations dynamically alter the intrinsic excitability of cortical neurons, impeding their ability to integrate and process sensory information efficiently (Neckelmann et al., 2000; Williams et al., 2016, 2020). It has therefore been suggested that such instability of sensory representations during seizures may contribute to impairing the cortical functions necessary for normal conscious experience (Williams et al., 2020). Other types of epilepsy are associated with abnormal cortical synchronisation in mammals (Uhlhaas and Singer, 2006). For example, short periods of high-frequency oscillations (100-500 Hz) are frequently observed near the time of seizure onset in rodent models and patients with mesial temporal lobe or neocortical focal epilepsy, where they may signal proximity to the epileptogenic focus (Bragin et al., 1999; Jirsch et al., 2006).

### 6.2.2 Anoxia

Disturbed cortical dynamics are also characteristic of cerebral ischaemia or anoxia following cardiac arrest, asphyxia or severe stroke. As a metabolically expensive organ, the mammalian brain is very sensitive to any interruption in its oxygenation, and prolonged global anoxia is often associated with a poor prognosis. Loss of oxygenation results in a rapid decrease in the amplitude and frequency of cortical activity, which gives way to a flat or isoelectric EEG. However, convergent findings from clinical investigations and studies on various mammals indicate that this sustained electrocerebral inactivity, marking the entry into a deep comatose state, is generally preceded by stereotyped changes in the frequency content of EEG signals (reviewed in Charpier, 2023).

Experiments conducted on sedated or anaesthetised rodents, cats, and monkeys (rat: Hansen, 1978; Borjigin et al., 2013; Schramm et al., 2020; Carton-Leclercq et al., 2023; cat: Sugar
and Gerard, 1938; Creutzfeldt et al., 1957; Hossmann and Sato,
1971; monkey: Myers and Yamaguchi, 1977) have shown that the
onset of anoxia is associated with a transient increase in beta-
gamma activities, often mixed with theta oscillations (Figure 7).
Single-unit and intracellular recordings revealed that this period of
high-frequency EEG activity correlates with rapid, low-amplitude
synaptic fluctuations in deep-layer pyramidal neurons, a slight
depolarization of their resting membrane potential and an increase
in their firing rate (Figure 7) (Creutzfeldt et al., 1957; Carton-
Leclercq et al., 2023). This cortical state is thought to result from an
overactivation of synaptic receptors due to an excessive release of
glutamate in the interstitial medium (Katchman and Hershkowitz,
1993; Fleidervish et al., 2001), although a complete understanding
of the underlying cellular and network mechanisms will require
further exploration. Fast electrical activity is also observed on the
EEG of a number of critically ill patients after activation of the
Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care protocol and discontinuation of
life-sustaining treatment (Auyong et al., 2010; Norton et al., 2017;
Xu et al., 2023). These brief occurrences of arousal-like activity,
suggesting the emergence of consciousness without any outward
signs of it, have been proposed as the origin of the vivid sensations
and paradoxical lucidity associated with near-death experiences
(Chawla et al., 2017; Parnia et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2023). However,
high-frequency oscillations are a widespread rhythm not specific
to conscious experiences, and the rather short duration of this
episode of cortical activation has been deemed difficult to reconcile
with the prolonged perceptions reported by some experiencers. The
persistence of these rapid oscillations up to the moment of the
isoelectric state and their resurgence at irregular intervals after its
onset are also controversial. They have not been documented in
all studies (see Chawla et al., 2017; Vincente et al., 2022; Xu et al.,
2023 for report of such late surges of fast activity and Clute and
Levy, 1990; Norton et al., 2017; Matory et al., 2021 for their non-
occurrence) and it has been suggested that they may, at least in
part, reflect muscle contractions rather than brain activity (Greyson
et al., 2022).

The high-frequency cortical state is rapidly followed by a
gradual decline of cortical activities in all frequency bands, briefly
interrupted by a late surge of delta waves. This low-frequency EEG
pattern is commonly observed in mammals exposed to anoxia
and was first reported in humans by Berger during his pioneering
experiments (human: Berger, 1934; Clute and Levy, 1990; Ammirati
et al., 1998; Norton et al., 2017; rat: Borjigin et al., 2013; Lee et al.,
2017; Schramm et al., 2020; Carton-Leclercq et al., 2023; cat: Sugar
and Gerard, 1938; Creutzfeldt et al., 1957; rabbit: Colin et al., 1981).
At this stage of the anoxic process, cortical pyramidal neurons show
a reduced spontaneous firing and irregular synaptic depolarizations
that progressively attenuate in amplitude and frequency with time.
This dampening of cellular activity precedes the entry into the
isoelectric state, marked by a cessation of spontaneous firing,
and a loss of EEG and neuronal voltage fluctuations (Figure 7)
(Creutzfeldt et al., 1957; Fujimura et al., 1997; Schramm et al.,
2020; Carton-Leclercq et al., 2023). When ATP reserves reach a
critical threshold and metabolic impairment is near-complete (85-
90% decrease of the normal level), a large amplitude EEG wave,
referred to as the “wave of death”, suddenly emerges on the flat EEG.
This wave reflects a massive depolarization (anoxic depolarization)
of cortical neurons following the inhibition of Na⁺/K⁺ ATPase

pumps and the loss of homeostatic control of transmembrane ionic
concentrations (Pietrobon and Moskowitz, 2014). Except for its
onset time that may differ among species (but direct comparison
is difficult due to variations in experimental conditions; Charpier,
2023 for review), anoxic depolarization has been observed with
many phenomenological and mechanistical similarities in most
mammals (mouse: Takano et al., 2007; rat: van Rijn et al., 2011;
Schramm et al., 2020; Carton-Leclercq et al., 2023; human: Carlson
et al., 2018; Dreier et al., 2018; rabbit: Leão, 1947; cat: Hossmann,
1971; monkey: Harris et al., 1981), as well as in the central nervous
system of several invertebrates (Spong et al., 2016). This suggests
that the neural correlates of near-death processes have also been
well preserved throughout evolution. It is important to note that
the wave of death is no longer considered terminal. Evidence from
multi-scale electrophysiological recordings in rodents has shown
that it can be reversed by a timely reoxygenation and replaced
by its mirror wave, the “wave of resuscitation”, which reflects
the progressive repolarization of cortical neurons (Schramm
et al., 2020; Carton-Leclercq et al., 2023). Although the wave
of resuscitation has not yet been identified in humans, there is
good reason to believe that the use of suitable electrodes and
broadband recordings that preserve low frequencies will soon
enable its discovery.

7 Discussion

The data reviewed above highlight the many anatomical
disparities that distinguish the neocortex of the different mammals.
Evolution has led to variations in the overall size of the brain,
the number of cortical areas, the number of neurons, the size of
their dendritic trees and the estimated number of synapses, and
some of these differences appear to be particularly pronounced in
humans. Does this mean that we can talk about unique properties
that would set us apart from other species? Probably not. Firstly,
because most of these changes are not exclusive to our species
but are shared by most large-brained mammals. Secondly, because
evidence suggests that the mammalian neocortex is organised
into basic computational circuits, with common neuronal types,
distribution profiles and synaptic connectivity patterns. This
conservation extends to the electrophysiological properties of
pyramidal neurons, whose biophysical characteristics (apart from
a few specificities such as the expression of the h-current in
the supragranular layers), excitability rules and firing profiles are
similar across species. Furthermore, the consistency of unitary
excitatory synaptic potentials suggests that, despite variations
in neuronal architecture, the fundamental transfer of synaptic
information between neurons remains unchanged, probably as a
result of compensatory processes. Additionally, large-scale brain
dynamics, which underpin integrative functions and dysfunctions
of the brain, also appear to be largely preserved, pointing to a degree
of determinism in the structure-function relationship of neocortical
networks. However, variations in the morphology and proportion
of certain neuron subtypes between species, individuals or cortical
regions argue against the existence of a single, stereotyped mode
of operation of the mammalian cortical circuit. To borrow a
concept dear to the field of comparative anatomy, it would be
more appropriate to refer to a “unity of plan” or “archetypal
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 7</figcaption></figure>

Conservation of anoxia-induced cortical rhythms in mammals. (A) EEG and firing activity of two extracellularly recorded neurons (Extra) from the cat visual cortex before (Control) and after induction of global cerebral anoxia by $N_2$ inhalation (red line). The first period of relative stability (1.) is followed by a transient cortical activation evidenced by an acceleration of the EEG waves and an increase in the neuronal firing frequency (2.). The EEG activity then slows down and becomes dominated by delta-frequency waves that correlate with weak, irregular firing in cortical neurons (3.). The onset of the isoelectric state marks the loss of cellular and network activity (4.). Modified from Creutzfeldt et al. (1957). (B) Simultaneous recordings of the electrocorticogram (ECoG) and intracellular activity of a somatosensory cortex L5 pyramidal neuron (Intra), before and after cessation of artificial ventilation in a sedated and curarized rat. The dashed horizontal line indicates the mean control membrane potential (-66 mV). The graph shows the firing rate as a function of time. The four periods described above in the cat are similarly observed in the rat: the period of stability (1.), the period of firing rate increase (2.), the subsequent period of slow cortical oscillations (3.), and the isoelectric state (4.). Adapted with permission from Carton-Leclercq et al. (2023).

scheme” from which, on a continuum of possibilities, a number of specialisations emerge to meet different functional requirements. Thus, compared with other species, there is no revolution in the properties of human neurons and neocortical circuits; there are certainly differences, but there is also a marvellous resemblance, reflecting the continuation of an evolution that began with the first mammals and will probably continue beyond our species. In this respect, we could transpose to the study of the organisation and functioning of the neocortex what Darwin (1871) wrote in *The Descent of Man, and selection in relation to sex*: "Whether primaeval man, when he possessed very few arts of the rudest kind, and when his power of language was extremely imperfect,

would have deserved to be called man, must depend on the definition which we employ. In a series of forms graduating insensibly from some ape-like creature to man as he now exists, it would be impossible to fix on any definite point when the term ‘man’ ought to be used.” Echoing Darwin’s thoughts on language evolution, it is interesting to note that left hemispheric asymmetries in regions homologous to human language areas have been observed in non-human primates (Gannon et al., 1998; Cantalupo and Hopkins, 2001). Moreover, research on baboons and chimpanzees has revealed that the direction and degree of lateralization of gestural communication are linked to contralateral asymmetry of part of the cortical region homologous to Broca’s area
(Taglialatela et al., 2006; Meguerditchian et al., 2012; Becker et al., 2022). These findings suggest a possible evolutionary continuity between primate gestural communication lateralization and human language hemispheric specialisation, implying that the cerebral organisation of communication areas could have been inherited from a common ancestor, before the emergence of speech (Becker et al., 2022). Furthermore, the recent discovery of a complex structure in sperm whale vocalisations (Sharma et al., 2024), as well as the detection of a lateralized arcuate fasciculus (a white matter fibre tract involved in human language) in the bottlenose dolphin (Wright et al., 2018), raise intriguing questions about the existence and function of such hemispheric asymmetry in species that have long diverged from primates.

The analysis of the basic components of the circuit could, however, be considered insufficient to account for the complexity of functioning of the neocortex as a whole. Indeed, the emergentist approach to complex systems postulates that at each level of complexity, entirely new properties—not present in the system's constituents—appear, governed by new laws, new concepts and new generalisations; a theory that could be summed up by the physicist Anderson's eloquent formula "more is different" (Anderson, 1972). A well-known example of this theory is that of the properties of water, such as vorticity or entropy, which cannot be deduced from knowledge of the characteristics of individual H₂O molecules. Applied to the brain, the concept of emergence implies a dynamic and highly integrated functioning of the cerebral cortex, in which the coordinated activity of groups of neurons distributed in primary and associative cortical areas allows the emergence of coherent behavioural and cognitive acts. Direct (though only correlative) evidence for the formation, mediated by synchronisation mechanisms over multiple frequency bands, of such coherent ensembles has been obtained in humans, cats, monkeys, and rats, during a variety of active perceptuomotor behaviours (for a review, see Varela et al., 2001). It seems reasonable to assume that the iteration of an archetypal cortical circuit (considered here as a cognitive module or unit) could increase the number of possible combinations of the different sub-circuits and favour the behavioural diversity of the system. We also need to consider the evolutionary aspect of these complex brain figures, which are likely to change as a function of the physical, biological and social contexts of each species or individual. These dynamic and reciprocal links between the cortex and its environment will thus lead to the emergence of diverse and characteristic experiences, underpinned by common elementary cerebral processes from which they are indissociable.

A balanced synthesis between reductionist and emergentist approaches could postulate that the cerebral activities underlying mental processes are shared by different species and that cognitive performance is the result of complex cerebral dynamics. However, this perspective does not answer the fundamental question of how specific spatio-temporal brain dynamics translate into conscious

experiences, such as sensations, reasoning or memories. Like the physiologist du Bois-Reymond (1882) (the first to describe AP in nerve fibres), who identified this issue as one of the seven world enigmas in his famous 1882 lecture on *Ignorabimus*, modern neurophilosophers continue to assert that bridging the explanatory gap between brain activity and subjective phenomena, regardless of the species, will remain beyond the reach of scientific investigation (Levine, 1983; Chalmers, 1995). A more optimistic view would be to consider that this intricate relationship between neural and mental events, which defies the intrinsic limits of our knowledge but whose analysis is a real driving force for questioning, is a missing link whose contours and principles have yet to be defined.

## Author contributions

SM: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

## Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Research performed in my laboratory was supported by the Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Sorbonne Université (Emergence-2019), and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE37-0021; ANR-19-CE37-0021; Investissements d'avenir-ANR-10-IAIHU-0006).

## Acknowledgments

I thank Stéphane Charpier for the lively discussions and comments on the manuscript.

## Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

## Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

## References

Adams, D. L., and Horton, J. C. (2003). Capricious expression of cortical columns in the primate brain. *Nat. Neurosci.* 6, 113–114. doi: 10.1038/nn1004

Adrian, E. D., and Matthews, B. H. C. (1934). The Berger rhythm: Potential changes from the occipital lobe in man. *Brain* 57, 355–385. doi: 10.1093/brain/57.4.355
Ahmed, B., Anderson, J. C., Douglas, R. J., Martin, K. A., and Nelson, J. C. (1994). Polyneuronal innervation of spiny stellate neurons in cat visual cortex. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 341, 39–49. doi: 10.1002/cne.903410105

Aiello, L. C., and Wheeler, P. (1995). The expensive-tissue hypothesis: the brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. *Curr. Anthropol.* 36, 199–221. doi: 10.1086/204350

Altwegg-Boussac, T., Chavez, M., Mahon, S., and Charpier, S. (2014). Excitability and responsiveness of rat barrel cortex neurons in the presence and absence of spontaneous synaptic activity in vivo. *J. Physiol.* 592, 3577–3595. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.270561

Amatrudo, J. M., Weaver, C. M., Criminis, J. L., Hof, P. R., Rosene, D. L., and Luebke, J. I. (2012). Influence of highly distinctive structural properties on the excitability of pyramidal neurons in monkey visual and prefrontal cortices. *J. Neurosci.* 32, 13644–13660. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2581-12.2012

Amirikian, B., and Georgopoulos, A. P. (2003). Modular organization of directionally tuned cells in the motor cortex: is there a short-range order? *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.* 100, 12474–12479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.203771900

Ammirati, F., Colivicchi, F., Di Battista, G., Garelli, F. F., and Santini, M. (1998). Electroencephalographic correlates of vasovagal synapse induced by head-up tilt testing. *Stroke* 29, 2347–2351. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.29.11.2347

Anastasiades, P. G., Marlin, J. J., and Carter, A. G. (2018). Cell-type specificity of callosally evoked excitation and feedforward inhibition in the prefrontal cortex. *Cell Rep.* 22, 679–692. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.073

Anderson, C. T., Sheets, P. L., Kiritani, T., and Shepherd, G. M. (2010). Sublayer-specific microcortices of corticospinal and corticostriatal neurons in motor cortex. *Nat. Neurosci.* 13, 739–744. doi: 10.1038/nn.2538

Anderson, P. W. (1972). More Is Different: Broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchical structure of science. *Science* 177, 393–396. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4047.393

Aristotle (ca. 335 BCE). *On the Parts of Animals*. 1952, *Great Books of the Western World*. Chicago, Ill: Encyclopedia Britannica.

Ascoli, G. A., Alonso-Nanclares, L., Anderson, S. A., Barrionuevo, G., Benavides-Piccione, R., Burkhalter, A., et al. (2008). Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex. *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.* 9, 557–568. doi: 10.1038/nrn2402

Aserinsky, E., and Kleitman, N. (1953). Regularly occurring periods of eye motility, and concomitant phenomena, during sleep. *Science* 118, 273–274. doi: 10.1126/science.118.3062.273

Auyong, D. B., Klein, S. M., Gan, T. J., Roche, A. M., Olson, D., and Habib, A. S. (2010). Processed electroencephalogram during donation after cardiac death. *Anesth. Analg.* 110, 1428–1432. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d27067

Avesar, D., and Gulledge, A. T. (2012). Selective serotonergic excitation of callosal projection neurons. *Front. Neural Circuits* 6:12. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2012.00012

Avoli, M., Hwa, G. G., Lacaille, J. C., Olivier, A., and Villemure, J. G. (1994). Electrophysiological and repetitive firing properties of neurons in the superficial/middle layers of the human neocortex maintained in vitro. *Exp. Brain Res.* 98, 135–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00229118

Avoli, M., and Olivier, A. (1989). Electrophysiological properties and synaptic responses in the deep layers of the human epileptogenic neocortex in vitro. *J. Neurophysiol.* 61, 589–606. doi: 10.1152/jn.1989.61.3.589

Azevedo, F. A., Carvalho, L. R., Grinberg, L. T., Farfel, J. M., Ferretti, R. E., Leite, R. E., et al. (2009). Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 513, 532–541. doi: 10.1002/cne.21974

Bai, X., Vestal, M., Berman, R., Negishi, M., Spann, M., Vega, C., et al. (2010). Dynamic time course of typical childhood absence seizures: EEG, behavior, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. *J. Neurosci.* 30, 5884–5893. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5101-09.2010

Baker, A., Kalmbach, B., Morishima, M., Kim, J., Juavinet, A., Li, N., et al. (2018a). Specialized subpopulations of deep-layer pyramidal neurons in the neocortex: bridging cellular properties to functional consequences. *J. Neurosci.* 38, 5441–5455. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0150-18.2018

Baker, A. L., O'Toole, R. J., and Gulledge, A. T. (2018b). Preferential cholinergic excitation of corticopontine neurons. *J. Physiol.* 596, 1659–1679. doi: 10.1113/JP275194

Bakken, T. E., Jorstad, N. L., Hu, Q., Lake, B. B., Tian, W., Kalmbach, B. E., et al. (2021). Comparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse. *Nature* 598, 111–119. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03465-8

Balaram, P., and Kaas, J. H. (2014). Towards a unified scheme of cortical lamination for primary visual cortex across primates: insights from NeuN and VGLUT2 immunoreactivity. *Front. Neuroanat.* 8:81. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00081

Ballesteros-Yáñez, I., Muñoz, A., Contreras, J., Gonzalez, J., Rodriguez-Veiga, E., and DeFelipe, J. (2005). Double bouquet cell in the human cerebral cortex and a comparison with other mammals. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 486, 344–360. doi: 10.1002/cne.20533

Balzeau, A., and Charlier, P. (2016). What do cranial bones of LB1 tell us about Homo floresiensis? *J. Hum. Evol.* 93, 12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.12.008

Banerjee, A., Meredith, R. M., Rodríguez-Moreno, A., Mierau, S. B., Auberson, Y. P., and Paulsen, O. (2009). Double dissociation of spike timing-dependent potentiation and depression by subunit-preferring NMDA receptor antagonists in mouse barrel cortex. *Cereb. Cortex* 19, 2959–2969. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp067

Banovac, I., Sedmak, D., DŽaja, D., Jalsovec, D., Jovanov Milosevic, N., Rasin, M. R., et al. (2019). Somato-dendritic morphology and axon origin site specify von Economo neurons as a subclass of modified pyramidal neurons in the human anterior cingulate cortex. *J. Anat.* 235, 651–669. doi: 10.1111/joa.13068

Baranyi, A., Szente, M. B., and Woody, C. D. (1993). Electrophysiological characterization of different types of neurons recorded in vivo in the motor cortex of the cat. I. Patterns of firing activity and synaptic responses. *J. Neurophysiol.* 69, 1850–1864. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.6.1850

Barton, R. A., and Venditti, C. (2013). Human frontal lobes are not relatively large. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.* 110, 9001–9006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215723110

Beaulieu-Laroche, L., Brown, N. J., Hansen, M., Toloza, E. H. S., Sharma, J., Williams, Z. M., et al. (2021). Allometric rules for mammalian cortical layer 5 neuron biophysics. *Nature* 600, 274–278. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04072-3

Beaulieu-Laroche, L., Toloza, E. H. S., van der Goes, M. S., Lafourcade, M., Barnagian, D., Williams, Z. M., et al. (2018). Enhanced dendritic compartmentalization in human cortical neurons. *Cell* 175, 643–651. e614. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.045

Becker, Y., Claidière, N., Margiotoudi, K., Marie, D., Roth, M., Nazarian, B., et al. (2022). Broca's cerebral asymmetry reflects gestural communication's lateralisation in monkeys (Papio anubis). *Elife* 11:e05251. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70521

Bekkers, J. M., and Häusser, M. (2007). Targeted dendrotomy reveals active and passive contributions of the dendritic tree to synaptic integration and neuronal output. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.* 104, 11447–11452. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 0701586104

Benavides-Piccione, R., Ballesteros-Yáñez, I., DeFelipe, J., and Yuste, R. (2002). Cortical area and species differences in dendritic spine morphology. *J. Neurocytol.* 31, 337–346. doi: 10.1023/A:1024134312173

Benavides-Piccione, R., Hamzei-Sichani, F., Ballesteros-Yanez, I., DeFelipe, J., and Yuste, R. (2006). Dendritic size of pyramidal neurons differs among mouse cortical regions. *Cereb. Cortex* 16, 990–1001. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bjh041

Benjamin, A. V., Wailes-Newson, K., Ma-Wyatt, A., Baker, D. H., and Wade, A. R. (2018). The Effect of Locomotion on Early Visual Contrast Processing in Humans. *J. Neurosci.* 38, 3050–3059. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1428-17.2017

Benshalom, G., and White, L. E. (1986). Quantification of thalamocortical synapses with spiny stellate neurons in layer IV of mouse somatosensory cortex. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 253, 303–314. doi: 10.1002/cne.902530303

Berg, J., Sorensen, S. A., Ting, J. T., Miller, J. A., Chartrand, T., Buchin, A., et al. (2021). Human neocortical expansion involves glutamatergic neuron diversification. *Nature* 598, 151–158. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03813-8

Berger, H. (1929). Über das elektroenkephalogram des menschen. *Arch. Psychiatr. Nervenkrankheiten* 87, 527–570. doi: 10.1007/BF01797193

Berger, H. (1934). Über das elektrenkephalogram des menschen. *DMW* 60, 1947–1949. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1130334

Bininda-Emonds, O. R., Cardillo, M., Jones, K. E., MacPhee, R. D., Beck, R. M., Grenyer, R., et al. (2007). The delayed rise of present-day mammals. *Nature* 446, 507–512. doi: 10.1038/nature05634

Blake, H., and Gerard, R. (1937). Brain potentials during sleep. *Am. J. Physiol. Legacy Content* 119, 692–703. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1937.119.4.692

Blumenfeld, H. (2005a). Cellular and network mechanisms of spike-wave seizures. *Epilepsia* 46, 21–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00311.x

Blumenfeld, H. (2005b). Consciousness and epilepsy: why are patients with absence seizures absent? *Prog. Brain Res.* 150, 271–286. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50020-7

Boldog, E., Bakken, T. E., Hodge, R. D., Novotny, M., Aevermann, B. D., Baka, J., et al. (2018). Transcriptomic and morphophysiological evidence for a specialized human cortical GABAergic cell type. *Nat. Neurosci.* 21, 1185–1195. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0205-2

Bollimunta, A., Chen, Y., Schroeder, C. E., and Ding, M. (2008). Neuronal mechanisms of cortical alpha oscillations in awake-behaving macaques. *J. Neurosci.* 28, 9976–9988. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2699-08.2008

Borjigin, J., Lee, U., Liu, T., Pal, D., Huff, S., Klarr, D., et al. (2013). Surge of neurophysiological coherence and connectivity in the dying brain. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.* 110, 14432–14437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308285110

Bourassa, J., and Deschênes, M. (1995). Corticothalamic projections from the primary visual cortex in rats: a single fiber study using biocytin as an anterograde tracer. *Neuroscience* 66, 253–263. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00009-8

Bourgeois, J. -P. (2008). Synaptogenèses normales, pathologiques et amendables dans le cortex cérébral. *Psychiatr. Sci. Hum. Neurosci.* 6, 124–136. doi: 10.1007/s11836-008-0065-z
Bourgeois, J. P., and Rakic, P. (1993). Changes of synaptic density in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey from fetal to adult stage. *J. Neurosci.* 13, 2801–2820. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-07-02801.1993

Boyer, M., Baudin, P., Stengel, C., Valero-Cabre, A., Lohaf, A. M., Charpier, S., et al. (2022). In vivo low-intensity magnetic pulses durably alter neocortical neuron excitability and spontaneous activity. *J. Physiol.* 600, 4019–4037. doi: 10.1113/JP283244

Bragin, A., Engel, J. Jr., Wilson, C. L., Fried, I., and Mathern, G. W. (1999). Hippocampal and entorhinal cortex high-frequency oscillations (100–500 Hz) in human epileptic brain and in kainic acid-treated rats with chronic seizures. *Epilepsia* 40, 127–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb02065.x

Brecht, M., Roth, A., and Sakmann, B. (2003). Dynamic receptive fields of reconstructed pyramidal cells in layers 3 and 2 of rat somatosensory barrel cortex. *J. Physiol.* 553, 243–265. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.044222

Broca, P. (1861). Sur le volume et la forme du cerveau suivant les individus et suivant les races. *Bull. Soc. d'Anthropol.* 2, 139–207.

Brodmann, K. (1909). *Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues: Leipzig: Barth.*

Brodmann, K. (1912). Neue Ergebnisse über die vergleichende histologische Lokalisation der Grosshirnrinde mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Stirnhirns. *Anat. Anz.* 41, 157–216.

Brown, S. P., and Hestrin, S. (2009). Intracortical circuits of pyramidal neurons reflect their long-range axonal targets. *Nature* 457, 1133–1136. doi: 10.1038/nature07658

Bruner, E., Manzi, G., and Arsuaga, J. L. (2003). Encephalization and allometric trajectories in the genus *Homo*: evidence from the Neandertal and modern lineages. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 100, 15335–15340. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2536671100

Bugbee, N. M., and Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1983). Columnar organization of corticocortical projections in squirrel and rhesus monkeys: similarity of column width in species differing in cortical volume. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 220, 355–364. doi: 10.1002/cne.902200309

Bullock, T., Cecotti, H., and Giesbrecht, B. (2015). Multiple stages of information processing are modulated during acute bouts of exercise. *Neuroscience* 307, 138–150. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.08.046

Bush, E. C., and Allman, J. M. (2004). The scaling of frontal cortex in primates and carnivores. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 101, 3962–3966. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0305760101

Butti, C., Santos, M., Uppal, N., and Hof, P. R. (2013). Von Economo neurons: clinical and evolutionary perspectives. *Cortex* 49, 312–326. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.004

Buxhoeveden, D. P., and Casanova, M. F. (2002). The minicolumn hypothesis in neuroscience. *Brain* 125, 935–951. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf110

Buzsáki, G., Bickford, R. G., Ponomareff, G., Thal, L. J., Mandel, R., and Gage, F. H. (1988). Nucleus basalis and thalamic control of neocortical activity in the freely moving rat. *J. Neurosci.* 8, 4007–4026. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-11-04007.1988

Buzsáki, G., and Draguhn, A. (2004). Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. *Science* 304, 1926–1929. doi: 10.1126/science.1099745

Buzsáki, G., Logothetis, N., and Singer, W. (2013). Scaling brain size, keeping timing: evolutionary preservation of brain rhythms. *Neuron* 80, 751–764. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.002

Buzsáki, G., and Wang, X. J. (2012). Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. *Annu. Rev. Neurosci.* 35, 203–225. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150444

Campagnola, L., Seeman, S. C., Chartrand, T., Kim, L., Hoggarth, A., Gamlin, C., et al. (2022). Local connectivity and synaptic dynamics in mouse and human neocortex. *Science* 375:eabj5861. doi: 10.1126/science.abj5861

Cantalupo, C., and Hopkins, W. D. (2001). Asymmetric Broca's area in great apes. *Nature* 414:505. doi: 10.1038/35107134

Cantero, J. L., Atienza, M., Stickgold, R., Kahana, M. J., Madsen, J. R., and Kocsis, B. (2003). Sleep-dependent theta oscillations in the human hippocampus and neocortex. *J. Neurosci.* 23, 10897–10903. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-34-10897.2003

Cao, L., and Handel, B. (2019). Walking enhances peripheral visual processing in humans. *PLoS Biol* 17:e3000511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000511

Carlson, A. P., Shuttleworth, C. W., Major, S., Lemale, C. L., Dreier, J. P., and Hartings, J. A. (2018). Terminal spreading depolarizations causing electrocortical silencing prior to clinical brain death: case report. *J. Neurosurg.* 131, 1773–1779. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.JNS181478

Carmody, R. N., and Wrangham, R. W. (2009). The energetic significance of cooking. *J. Hum. Evol.* 57, 379–391. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.02.011

Carton-Leclercq, A., Carrion-Falgarona, S., Baudin, P., Lemaire, P., Lecas, S., Topilko, T., et al. (2023). Laminar organization of neocortical activities during systemic anoxia. *Neurobiol. Dis.* 188, 106345. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106345

Carton-Leclercq, A., Lecas, S., Chavez, M., Charpier, S., and Mahon, S. (2021). Neuronal excitability and sensory responsiveness in the thalamo-cortical network in a novel rat model of isoelectric brain state. *J. Physiol.* 599, 609–629. doi: 10.1113/JP280266

Catania, K. C., Lyon, D. C., Mock, O. B., and Kaas, J. H. (1999). Cortical organization in shrews: evidence from five species. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 410, 55–72. 3.0.CO;2-2* target="blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990719)410:1<55:: AID-CNE6>3.0.CO;2-2

Caton, R. (1875). The electric currents of the brain. *Br. Med. J.*, 2, 278.

Cavanna, A. E., and Monaco, F. (2009). Brain mechanisms of altered conscious states during epileptic seizures. *Nat. Rev. Neurol.* 5, 267–276. doi: 10.1038/nrn neurol.2009.38

Chagnac-Amitai, Y., Luhmann, H. J., and Prince, D. A. (1990). Burst generating and regular spiking layer 5 pyramidal neurons of rat neocortex have different morphological features. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 296, 598–613. doi: 10.1002/cne.902960407

Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. *J. Conscious. Stud.* 2, 200–219.

Chang, Y. M., and Luebke, J. I. (2007). Electrophysiological diversity of layer 5 pyramidal cells in the prefrontal cortex of the rhesus monkey: in vitro slice studies. *J. Neurophysiol.* 98, 2622–2632. doi: 10.1152/jn.00585.2007

Sharpie, S. (2008). Louis Lapicque (1866–1952): a century of intrinsic excitability. *Rev. Neurol.* 164, F53–66.

Sharpie, S. (2023). Between life and death: the brain twilight zones. *Front. Neurosci.* 16:1156368. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1156368

Chauvette, S., Crochet, S., Volgushev, M., and Timofeev, I. (2011). Properties of slow oscillation during slow-wave sleep and anesthesia in cats. *J. Neurosci.* 31, 14998–15008. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2339-11.2011

Chawla, L. S., Terek, M., Junker, C., Akst, S., Yoon, B., Brasha-Mitchell, E., et al. (2017). Characterization of end-of-life electroencephalographic surges in critically ill patients. *Death Stud.* 41, 385–392. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2017.1287138

Chen, W., Zhang, J. J., Hu, G. Y., and Wu, C. P. (1996). Electrophysiological and morphological properties of pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons in the cat motor cortex in vitro. *Neuroscience* 73, 39–55. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(96)00009-7

Chenn, A., and Walsh, C. A. (2002). Regulation of cerebral cortical size by control of cell cycle exit in neural precursors. *Science* 297, 365–369. doi: 10.1126/science.1074192

Chevee, M., Robertson, J. J., Cannon, G. H., Brown, S. P., and Goff, L. A. (2018). Variation in activity state, axonal projection, and position define the transcriptional identity of individual neocortical projection neurons. *Cell Rep.* 22, 441–455. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.046

Clarke, D. D., and Sokoloff, L. (1999). "Circulation and energy metabolism of the brain," in *Basic neurochemistry: Molecular, cellular, and medical aspects*, eds. G. J. Siegel, Agranoff, B. W., Albers, R. W., Fisher, S. K. and Uhler, M. D. (New York: Lippincott-Raven), 637–669.

Clute, H. L., and Levy, W. J. (1990). Electroencephalographic changes during brief cardiac arrest in humans. *Anesthesiology* 73, 821–825. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199011000-00004

Colin, F., Manil, J., and Bourgain, R. H. (1981). The effect of acute anoxia on the cortical somatosensory evoked potential in the rabbit. *Neurol. Res.* 3, 393–407. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1981.11739612

Constantinople, C. M., and Bruno, R. M. (2013). Deep cortical layers are activated directly by thalamus. *Science* 340, 1591–1594. doi: 10.1126/science.1236425

Cotel, F., Fletcher, L. N., Kalita-de Croft, S., Apergis-Schoute, J., and Williams, S. R. (2018). Cell class-dependent intracortical connectivity and output dynamics of layer 6 projection neurons of the rat primary visual cortex. *Cereb. Cortex* 28, 2340–2350. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx134

Crandall, S. R., Patrick, S. L., Cruikshank, S. J., and Connors, B. W. (2017). Infrabarrels are layer 6 circuit modules in the barrel cortex that link long-range inputs and outputs. *Cell Rep.* 21, 3065–3078. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.049

Creuzfeldt, O., Kasamatsu, A., and Vaz-Ferreira, A. (1957). Activity changes of single cortical neurons in acute oxygen deficiency and their relation to electroencephalography in cats. *Pflugers Arch. Gesamte Physiol. Menschen Tiere* 263, 647–667. doi: 10.1007/BF00362853

Cruikshank, S. J., Lewis, T. J., and Connors, B. W. (2007). Synaptic basis for intense thalamocortical activation of feedforward inhibitory cells in neocortex. *Nat. Neurosci.* 10, 462–468. doi: 10.1038/nn1861

Crunelli, V., Lorincz, M. L., McCafferty, C., Lambert, R. C., Leresche, N., Di Giovanni, G., et al. (2020). Clinical and experimental insight into pathophysiology, comorbidity and therapy of absence seizures. *Brain* 143, 2341–2368. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa072

Dann, J. F., and Buhl, E. H. (1995). Patterns of connectivity in the neocortex of the echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). *Cereb. Cortex* 5, 363–373. doi: 10.1093/cercor/5.4.363

Darwin, C. (1859). *On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle For Life.* London: John Murray. doi: 10.5962/bhl title.68064

Darwin, C. (1871). *The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex*, Vol. 1. London: John Murray. doi: 10.1037/12293-000
de Kock, C. P., and Sakmann, B. (2008). High frequency action potential bursts (≥ 100 Hz) in L2/3 and L5B thick tufted neurons in anaesthetized and awake rat primary somatosensory cortex. *J. Physiol.* 586, 3353–3364. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.155580

de Kock, C. P. J., and Feldmeyer, D. (2023). Shared and divergent principles of synaptic transmission between cortical excitatory neurons in rodent and human brain. *Front. Synaptic Neurosci.* 15:1274383. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2023.1274383

Deaneer, R. O., Isler, K., Burkart, J., and van Schaik, C. (2007). Overall brain size, and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates. *Brain Behav. Evol.* 70, 115–124. doi: 10.1159/000102973

DeFelipe, J. (2011). The evolution of the brain, the human nature of cortical circuits, and intellectual creativity. *Front. Neuroanat.* 5:29. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2011.00029

DeFelipe, J., Alonso-Nanclares, L., and Arellano, J. I. (2002). Microstructure of the neocortex: comparative aspects. *J. Neurocytol.* 31, 299–316. doi: 10.1023/A:1024130211265

DeFelipe, J., Ballesteros-Yáñez, I., Inda, M. C., and Muñoz, A. (2006). Double-bouquet cells in the monkey and human cerebral cortex with special reference to areas 17 and 18. *Prog. Brain Res.* 154, 15–32. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)54002-6

Dégenėtais, E., Thierry, A. M., Glowinski, J., and Gioanni, Y. (2002). Electrophysiological properties of pyramidal neurons in the rat prefrontal cortex: an in vivo intracellular recording study. *Cereb. Cortex* 12, 1–16. doi: 10.1093/cercor/12.1.1

Deitcher, Y., Eyal, G., Kanari, L., Verhoog, M. B., Atenekeng Kahou, G. A., Mansvelder, H. D., et al. (2017). Comprehensive morpho-electrotonic analysis shows 2 distinct classes of L2 And L3 pyramidal neurons in human temporal cortex. *Cereb. Cortex* 27, 5398–5414. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx226

Dembrow, N., and Johnston, D. (2014). Subcircuit-specific neuromodulation in the prefrontal cortex. *Front. Neural Circuits* 8:54. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00054

Dembrow, N. C., Chitwood, R. A., and Johnston, D. (2010). Projection-specific neuromodulation of medial prefrontal cortex neurons. *J. Neurosci.* 30, 16922–16937. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3644-10.2010

Dement, W. (1958). The occurrence of low voltage, fast, electroencephalogram patterns during behavioral sleep in the cat. *Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.* 10, 291–296. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(58)90037-3

Depaulis, A., and Charpier, S. (2018). Pathophysiology of absence epilepsy: Insights from genetic models. *Neurosci. Lett.* 667, 53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.02.035

Depaulis, A., David, O., and Charpier, S. (2016). The genetic absence epilepsy rat from Strasbourg as a model to decipher the neuronal and network mechanisms of generalized idiopathic epilepsies. *J. Neurosci. Methods* 260, 159–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.05.022

DeSilva, J., and Lesnik, J. (2006). Chimpanzee neonatal brain size: Implications for brain growth in Homo erectus. *J. Hum. Evol.* 51, 207–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.05.006

Destexhe, A. (1999). Can GABAA conductances explain the fast oscillation frequency of absence seizures in rodents? *Eur. J. Neurosci.* 11, 2175–2181. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00660.x

Destexhe, A., McCormick, D. A., and Sejnowski, T. J. (1999). Thalamic and thalamocortical mechanisms underlying 3 Hz spike-and-wave discharges. *Prog. Brain Res.* 121, 289–307. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)63080-0

Destexhe, A., Rudolph, M., and Paré, D. (2003). The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo. *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.* 4, 739–751. doi: 10.1038/nrn1198

Dooley, J. C., Franca, J. G., Seelke, A. M., Cooke, D. F., and Krubitzer, L. A. (2015). Evolution of mammalian sensorimotor cortex: thalamic projections to parietal cortical areas in Monodelphis domestica. *Front. Neuroanat.* 8:163. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00163

Douglas, R. J., and Martin, K. A. (2004). Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. *Annu. Rev. Neurosci.* 27, 419–451. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144152

Douglas, R. J., Martin, K. A., and Whitteridge, D. (1989). A canonical microcircuit for neocortex. *Neural Comput.* 1, 480–488. doi: 10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.480

Dreier, J. P., Major, S., Foreman, B., Winkler, M. K. L., Kang, E. J., Milakara, D., et al. (2018). Terminal spreading depolarization and electrical silence in death of human cerebral cortex. *Ann. Neurol.* 83, 295–310. doi: 10.1002/ana.25147

du Bois-Reymond, E. (1882). The seven world problems'. *Popular Sci. Monthly* 20, 433–447. doi: 10.1007/BF01443331

Dubois, E. (1894). *Pithecanthropus erectus: eine menschenähnliche Übergangsform aus Java: Batavia: Landesdruckerei.*

Dubois, E. (1896). Le Pithecanthropus erectus et l'origine de l'homme. *Bull. Mémoi Soc. d'anthropol.* 7, 460–467. doi: 10.3406/bmsap.1896.5655

Dubois, E. (1897). Sur le rapport du poids de l'encéphale avec la grandeur du corps chez les mammifères. *Bull. Mémoi Soc. d'anthropol.* 8, 337–376. doi: 10.3406/bmsap.1897.5705

Dubois, E. (1899). Abstract of remarks on the brain-cast of pithecanthropus erectus. *J. Anatomy Physiol.* 33, 273–276.

Dunbar, R. I., and Shultz, S. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. *Science* 317, 1344–1347. doi: 10.1126/science.1145463

D'Zaja, D., Hladnik, A., Bicanic, I., Bakovic, M., and Petanjek, Z. (2014). Neocortical calretinin neurons in primates: increase in proportion and microcircuitry structure. *Front. Neuroanat.* 8:103. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00103

Eccles, J. C. (1981). The modular operation of the cerebral neocortex considered as the material basis of mental events. *Neuroscience* 6, 1839–1856. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(81)90027-0

Eggermann, E., Kremer, Y., Crochet, S., and Petersen, C. C. H. (2014). Cholinergic signals in mouse barrel cortex during active whisker sensing. *Cell Rep.* 9, 1654–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.005

Elston, G. N., Benavides-Piccione, R., and DeFelipe, J. (2001). The pyramidal cell in cognition: a comparative study in human and monkey. *J. Neurosci.* 21:Rc163. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-17-j0002.2001

Elston, G. N., Elston, A., Freire, M. A. M., Gomes Leal, W., Dias, I. A., Pereira, A. Jr., et al. (2006). Specialization of pyramidal cell structure in the visual areas V1, V2 and V3 of the South American rodent, Dasyprocta primnolopha. *Brain Res.* 1106, 99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.100

Elston, G. N., and Fujita, I. (2014). Pyramidal cell development: postnatal spinogenesis, dendritic growth, axon growth, and electrophysiology. *Front. Neuroanat.* 8:78. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00078

Elston, G. N., Manger, P. R., and Pettigrew, J. D. (1999). Morphology of pyramidal neurones in cytochrome oxidase modules of the S-1 bill representation of the platypus. *Brain Behav. Evol.* 53, 87–101. doi: 10.1159/000006585

Elston, G. N., and Rosa, M. G. (1998). Morphological variation of layer III pyramidal neurones in the occipitotemporal pathway of the macaque monkey visual cortex. *Cereb. Cortex* 8, 278–294. doi: 10.1093/cercor/8.3.278

Elston, G. N., and Rosa, M. G. (2000). Pyramidal cells, patches, and cortical columns: a comparative study of infragranular neurons in TEO, TE, and the superior temporal polysensory area of the macaque monkey. *J. Neurosci.* 20:Rc117. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-j0003.2000

Engel, A. K., Fries, P., and Singer, W. (2001). Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.* 2, 704–716. doi: 10.1038/35094565

Eyal, G., Verhoog, M. B., Testa-Silva, G., Deitcher, Y., Benavides-Piccione, R., DeFelipe, J., et al. (2018). Human Cortical Pyramidal Neurons: From Spines to Spikes via Models. *Front. Neural Neurosci.* 12:181. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00181

Eyal, G., Verhoog, M. B., Testa-Silva, G., Deitcher, Y., Lodder, J. C., Benavides-Piccione, R., et al. (2016). Unique membrane properties and enhanced signal processing in human neocortical neurons. *Elife* 5. doi: 10.7554/eLife.16553.018

Faber, E. S., and Sah, P. (2003). Calcium-activated potassium channels: multiple contributions to neuronal function. *Neuroscientist* 9, 181–194. doi: 10.1177/107385840309003011

Fairén, A. D. D., and Regidor, J. (1984). "Nonpyramidal neurons: general account," in *Cerebral cortex, vol. 1. Cellular components of the cerebral cortex*, ed. E. G. J. A. Peters (New York: Plenum Press), 201–253.

Feldman, D. E. (2000). Timing-based LTP and LTD at vertical inputs to layer II/III pyramidal cells in rat barrel cortex. *Neuron* 27, 45–56. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00008-8

Feldmeyer, D. (2012). Excitatory neuronal connectivity in the barrel cortex. *Front. Neuroanat.* 6:24. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2012.00024

Feldmeyer, D., Lübke, J., and Sakmann, B. (2006). Efficacy and connectivity of intracolumnar pairs of layer 2/3 pyramidal cells in the barrel cortex of juvenile rats. *J. Physiol.* 575, 583–602. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.105106

Feldmeyer, D., Lübke, J., Silver, R. A., and Sakmann, B. (2002). Synaptic connections between layer 4 spiny neurone-layer 2/3 pyramidal cell pairs in juvenile rat barrel cortex: physiology and anatomy of interlaminar signalling within a cortical column. *J. Physiol.* 538, 803–822. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.012959

Fleidervish, I. A., Gebhardt, C., Astman, N., Gutnick, M. J., and Heinemann, U. (2001). Enhanced spontaneous transmitter release is the earliest consequence of neocortical hypoxia that can explain the disruption of normal circuit function. *J. Neurosci.* 21, 4600–4608. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-13-04600.2001

Fletcher, L. N., and Williams, S. R. (2019). Neocortical topology governs the dendritic integrative capacity of layer 5 pyramidal neurons. *Neuron*, 101, 76–90. e74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.048

Foehring, R. C., Lorenzon, N. M., Herron, P., and Wilson, C. J. (1991). Correlation of physiologically and morphologically identified neuronal types in human association cortex in vitro. *J. Neurophysiol.* 66, 1825–1837. doi: 10.1152/jn.1991.66.6.1825

Fries, P. (2015). Rhythms for cognition: communication through coherence. *Neuron* 88, 220–235. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.034

Froemke, R. C., and Dan, Y. (2002). Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains. *Nature* 416, 433–438. doi: 10.1038/416433a

Fujimura, N., Tanaka, E., Yamamoto, S., Shigemori, M., and Higashi, H. (1997). Contribution of ATP-sensitive potassium channels to hypoxic hyperpolarization in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons in vitro. *J. Neurophysiol.* 77, 378–385. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.378
Galakhova, A. A., Hunt, S., Wilbers, R., Heyer, D. B., de Kock, C. P. J., Mansvelder, H. D., et al. (2022). Evolution of cortical neurons supporting human cognition. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 26, 909–922. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.012

Galton, F. (1889). "On head growth in students at the University of Cambridge," in *Journal of Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland*, 155-156. doi: 10.2307/2842409

Gannon, P. J., Holloway, R. L., Broadfield, D. C., and Braun, A. R. (1998). Asymmetry of chimpanzee planum temporale: humanlike pattern of Wernicke's brain language area homolog. *Science* 279, 220-222. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5348.220

Garvin, H. M., Elliott, M. C., Delezene, L. K., Hawks, J., Churchill, S. E., Berger, L. R., et al. (2017). Body size, brain size, and sexual dimorphism in Homo naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber. *J. Hum. Evol.* 111, 119-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.06.010

Gastaut, H. (1952). Electrocorticographic study of the reactivity of rolandic rhythm. *Rev. Neurol.* 87, 176-182.

Gee, S., Ellwood, I., Patel, T., Luongo, F., Deisseroth, K., and Sohal, V. S. (2012). Synaptic activity unmasks dopamine D2 receptor modulation of a specific class of layer V pyramidal neurons in prefrontal cortex. *J. Neurosci.* 32, 4959-4971. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5835-11.2012

Gidon, A., Zolnik, T. A., Fidzinski, P., Bolduan, F., Papoutsi, A., Poirazi, P., et al. (2020). Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3 cortical neurons. *Science* 367, 83–87. doi: 10.1126/science.aax6239

Gilbert, C. D., and Wiesel, T. N. (1989). Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex. *J. Neurosci.* 9, 2432-2442. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-07-02432.1989

Gilman, J. P., Medalla, M., and Luebke, J. I. (2017). Area-Specific Features of Pyramidal Neurons-a Comparative Study in Mouse and Rhesus Monkey. *Cereb. Cortex* 27, 2078-2094. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw062

Glasser, M. F., Coalson, T. S., Robinson, E. C., Hacker, C. D., Harwell, J., Yacoub, E., et al. (2016). A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. *Nature* 536, 171-178. doi: 10.1038/nature18933

Glezer, II, Hof, P. R., Leranth, C., and Morgane, P. J. (1993). Calcium-binding protein-containing neuronal populations in mammalian visual cortex: a comparative study in whales, insectivores, bats, rodents, and primates. *Cereb. Cortex* 3, 249-272. doi: 10.1093/cercor/3.3.249

Gloor, P., and Fariello, R. G. (1988). Generalized epilepsy: some of its cellular mechanisms differ from those of focal epilepsy. *Trends Neurosci.* 11, 63-68. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(88)90166-X

González-Burgos, G., Miyamae, T., Krimer, Y., Gulchina, Y., Pafundo, D. E., Krimer, O., et al. (2019). Distinct properties of layer 3 pyramidal neurons from prefrontal and parietal areas of the monkey neocortex. *J. Neurosci.* 39, 7277-7290. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1210-19.2019

Gooch, H. M., Bluett, T., Perumal, M. B., Vo, H. D., Fletcher, L. N., Papacostas, J., et al. (2022). High-fidelity dendritic sodium spike generation in human layer 2/3 neocortical pyramidal neurons. *Cell Rep.* 41:111500. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111500

Goriounova, N. A., Heyer, D. B., Wilbers, R., Verhoog, M. B., Giugliano, M., Verbist, C., et al. (2018). Large and fast human pyramidal neurons associate with intelligence. *Elife* 7:e41714. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41714

Gouwens, N. W., Sorensen, S. A., Baftizadeh, F., Budzillo, A., Lee, B. R., Jarsky, T., et al. (2020). Integrated morphoelectric and transcriptomic classification of cortical GABAergic cells. *Cell* 183, 935-953.e919. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.057

Gregoriou, G. G., Gotts, S. J., Zhou, H., and Desimone, R. (2009). High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention. *Science* 324, 1207-1210. doi: 10.1126/science.1171402

Greyson, B., van Lommel, P., and Fenwick, P. (2022). Commentary: enhanced interplay of neuronal coherence and coupling in the dying human brain. *Front. Aging Neurosci.* 14:899491. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.899491

Groh, A., Meyer, H. S., Schmidt, E. F., Heintz, N., Sakmann, B., and Krieger, P. (2010). Cell-type specific properties of pyramidal neurons in neocortex underlying a layout that is modifiable depending on the cortical area. *Cereb. Cortex* 20, 826-836. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp152

Gunz, P., Neubauer, S., Maureille, B., and Hublin, J. J. (2010). Brain development after birth differs between Neanderthals and modern humans. *Curr. Biol.* 20, R921-922. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.018

Guo, J. N., Kim, R., Chen, Y., Negishi, M., Jhun, S., Weiss, S., et al. (2016). Impaired consciousness in patients with absence seizures investigated by functional MRI, EEG, and behavioural measures: a cross-sectional study. *Lancet Neurol.* 15, 1336-1345. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30295-2

Haeckel, E. (1868). *Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte: Gemeinverständliche wissenschaftliche Vorträge über die Entwickelungslehre im Allgemeinen und diejenige von Darwin, Goethe und Lamarck im Besonderen.* Berlin: G. Reimer.

Haider, B., Häusser, M., and Carandini, M. (2013). Inhibition dominates sensory responses in the awake cortex. *Nature* 493, 97-100. doi: 10.1038/nature11665

Hansen, A. J. (1978). The extracellular potassium concentration in brain cortex following ischemia in hypo- and hyperglycemic rats. *Acta Physiol. Scand.* 102, 324-329. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1978.tb06079.x

Hardingham, N. R., and Larkman, A. U. (1998). Rapid report: the reliability of excitatory synaptic transmission in slices of rat visual cortex *in vitro* is temperature dependent. *J. Physiol.* 507, 249-256. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.249bu.x

Hardingham, N. R., Read, J. C., Trevelyan, A. J., Nelson, J. C., Jack, J. J., and Bannister, N. J. (2010). Quantal analysis reveals a functional correlation between presynaptic and postsynaptic efficacy in excitatory connections from rat neocortex. *J. Neurosci.* 30, 1441-1451. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3244-09.2010

Harris, K. D., and Mrsic-Flogel, T. D. (2013). Cortical connectivity and sensory coding. *Nature* 503, 51-58. doi: 10.1038/nature12654

Harris, K. D., and Shepherd, G. M. (2015). The neocortical circuit: themes and variations. *Nat. Neurosci.* 18, 170-181. doi: 10.1038/nn.3917

Harris, R. J., Symon, L., Branston, N. M., and Bayhan, M. (1981). Changes in extracellular calcium activity in cerebral ischaemia. *J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.* 1, 203-209. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1981.21

Hartse, K. M. (2011). The phylogeny of sleep. *Handb. Clin. Neurol.* 98, 97-109. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52006-7.00007-1

Harvey, P. H., and Krebs, J. R. (1990). Comparing brains. *Science* 249, 140-146. doi: 10.1126/science.2196673

Hassiotis, M., and Ashwell, K. W. (2003). Neuronal classes in the corticostriatum of a monotreme, the Australian echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). *Brain Behav. Evol.* 61, 6-27. doi: 10.1159/000068877

Hassiotis, M., Paxinos, G., and Ashwell, K. W. (2005). Cyto- and chemoarchitecture of the cerebral cortex of an echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). II. Laminar organization and synaptic density. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 482, 94-122. doi: 10.1002/cne.20353

Hattox, A. M., and Nelson, S. B. (2007). Layer V neurons in mouse cortex projecting to different targets have distinct physiological properties. *J. Neurophysiol.* 98, 3330-3340. doi: 10.1152/jn.00397.2007

Haug, H. (1987). Brain sizes, surfaces, and neuronal sizes of the cortex cerebr: a stereological investigation of man and his variability and a comparison with some mammals (primates, whales, marsupials, insectivores, and one elephant). *Am. J. Anat.* 180, 126-142. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001800203

Häusser, M., and Mel, B. (2003). Dendrites: bug or feature? *Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.* 13, 372-383. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00075-8

Helmchen, F., Svoboda, K., Denk, W., and Tank, D. W. (1999). In vivo dendritic calcium dynamics in deep-layer cortical pyramidal neurons. *Nat. Neurosci.* 2, 989-996. doi: 10.1038/14788

Helmstaedter, M., Staiger, J. F., Sakmann, B., and Feldmeyer, D. (2008). Efficient recruitment of layer 2/3 interneurons by layer 4 input in single columns of rat somatosensory cortex. *J. Neurosci.* 28, 8273-8284. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5701-07.2008

Hendrickson, A. E., Wilson, J. R., and Ogren, M. P. (1978). The neuroanatomical organization of pathways between the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex in Old World and New World primates. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 182, 123-136. doi: 10.1002/cne.901820108

Herculano-Houzel, S. (2012). Neuronal scaling rules for primate brains: the primate advantage. *Prog. Brain Res.* 195, 325-340. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53860-4.00015-5

Herculano-Houzel, S., Avelino-de-Souza, K., Neves, K., Porfirio, J., Messeder, D., Mattos Feijó, L., et al. (2014). The elephant brain in numbers. *Front. Neuroanat.* 8:46. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00046

Herculano-Houzel, S., Collins, C. E., Wong, P., Kaas, J. H., and Lent, R. (2008). The basic nonuniformity of the cerebral cortex. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.* 105, 12593-12598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805417105

Hodge, R. D., Bakken, T. E., Miller, J. A., Smith, K. A., Barkan, E. R., Graybuck, L. T., et al. (2019). Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex. *Nature* 573, 61-68. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1506-7

Hof, P. R., Glezer, II, Condé, F., Flagg, R. A., Rubin, M. B., Nimchinsky, E. A., et al. (1999). Cellular distribution of the calcium-binding proteins parvalbumin, calbindin, and calretinin in the neocortex of mammals: phylogenetic and developmental patterns. *J. Chem. Neuroanat.* 16, 77-116. doi: 10.1016/S0891-0618(98)0065-9

Hofman, M. A. (1985). Size and shape of the cerebral cortex in mammals. I. The cortical surface. *Brain Behav. Evol.* 27, 28-40. doi: 10.1159/000118718

Hofman, M. A. (1988). Size and shape of the cerebral cortex in mammals. II. The cortical volume. *Brain Behav. Evol.* 32, 17-26. doi: 10.1159/000116529

Holloway, R. L. (2015). "The evolution of the hominid brain," in *Handbook of Paleoanthropology*, eds. W. Henke and I. Tattersall (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 1961-1987. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39979-4_81

Holmes, M. D., Brown, M., and Tucker, D. M. (2004). Are "generalized" seizures truly generalized? Evidence of localized mesial frontal and frontopolar discharges in absence. *Epilepsia* 45, 1568-1579. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.23204.x

Holmgren, C., Harkany, T., Svennenfors, B., and Zilberter, Y. (2003). Pyramidal cell communication within local networks in layer 2/3 of rat neocortex. *J. Physiol.* 551, 139-153. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.044784
Hooks, B. M., Hires, S. A., Zhang, Y. X., Huber, D., Petreanu, L., Svoboda, K., et al. (2011). Laminar analysis of excitatory local circuits in vibrissal motor and sensory cortical areas. *PLoS Biol.* 9:e1000572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000572

Horton, J. C., and Adams, D. L. (2005). The cortical column: a structure without a function. *Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B., Biol. Sci.* 360, 837–862. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1623

Hossmann, K. -A. (1971). Cortical steady potential, impedance and excitability changes during and after total ischemia of cat brain. *Exp. Neurol.* 32, 163–175. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(71)90060-4

Hossmann, K. A., and Sato, K. (1971). Effect of ischaemia on the function of the sensorimotor cortex in cat. *Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.* 30, 535–545. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(71)90151-9

Hu, W., Tian, C., Li, T., Yang, M., Hou, H., and Shu, Y. (2009). Distinct contributions of Na(v)1. 6 and Na(v)1. 2 in action potential initiation and backpropagation. *Nat. Neurosci.* 12, 996–1002. doi: 10.1038/nn.2359

Hubel, D. H., and Wiesel, T. N. (1963). Shape and arrangement of columns in cat's striate cortex. *J. Physiol.* 165, 559–568. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007079

Hubel, D. H., and Wiesel, T. N. (1969). Anatomical demonstration of columns in the monkey striate cortex. *Nature* 221, 747–750. doi: 10.1038/221747a0

Hubel, D. H., and Wiesel, T. N. (1974). Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 158, 267–293. doi: 10.1002/cne.901580304

Hublin, J. J., Neubauer, S., and Gunz, P. (2015). Brain ontogeny and life history in Pleistocene hominins. *Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B., Biol. Sci.* 370, 20140062. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0062

Hunt, S., Leibner, Y., Mertens, E. J., Barros-Zulaica, N., Kanari, L., Heistek, T. S., et al. (2023). Strong and reliable synaptic communication between pyramidal neurons in adult human cerebral cortex. *Cereb. Cortex* 33, 2857–2878. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhc246

Hutsler, J. J., Lee, D. G., and Porter, K. K. (2005). Comparative analysis of cortical layering and supragranular layer enlargement in rodent carnivore and primate species. *Brain Res.* 1052, 71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.06.015

Huttenlocher, P. R. (1979). Synaptic density in human frontal cortex - developmental changes and effects of aging. *Brain Res.* 163, 195–205. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90349-4

Ilin, V., Malyshev, A., Wolf, F., and Volgushev, M. (2013). Fast computations in cortical ensembles require rapid initiation of action potentials. *J. Neurosci.* 33, 2281–2292. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0771-12.2013

Imig, T. J., and Adrián, H. O. (1977). Binaural columns in the primary field (A1) of cat auditory cortex. *Brain Res.* 138, 241–257. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90743-0

Jacobs, B., Garcia, M. E., Shea-Shumsky, N. B., Tennison, M. E., Schall, M., Saviano, M. S., et al. (2018). Comparative morphology of gigantopyramidal neurons in primary motor cortex across mammals. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 526, 496–536. doi: 10.1002/cne.24349

Jacobs, B., Lubs, J., Hannan, M., Anderson, K., Butti, C., Sherwood, C. C., et al. (2011). Neuronal morphology in the African elephant (*Loxodonta africana*) neocortex. *Brain Struct. Funct.* 215, 273–298. doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0288-3

Jacobs, B., Schall, M., Prather, M., Kapler, E., Driscoll, L., Baca, S., et al. (2001). Regional dendritic and spine variation in human cerebral cortex: a quantitative golgi study. *Cereb. Cortex* 11, 558–571. doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.6.558

Jarre, G., Altwegg-Boussac, T., Williams, M. S., Studer, F., Chipaux, M., David, O., et al. (2017). Building up absence seizures in the somatosensory cortex: from network to cellular epileptogenic processes. *Cereb. Cortex* 27, 4607–4623. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx174

Jerison, H. J. (1973). *Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence*. New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385250-2.250018-3

Jirsch, J. D., Urrestarazu, E., LeVan, P., Olivier, A., Dubeau, F., and Gotman, J. (2006). High-frequency oscillations during human focal seizures. *Brain*, 129, 1593–1608. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl085

Jones, B. E. (2005). From waking to sleeping: neuronal and chemical substrates. *Trends Pharmacol. Sci.* 26, 578–586. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2005.09.009

Joshi, A., Kalappa, B. I., Anderson, C. T., and Tzounopoulos, T. (2016). Cell-Specific Cholinergic Modulation of Excitability of Layer 5B Principal Neurons in Mouse Auditory Cortex. *J. Neurosci.* 36, 8487–8499. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0780-16.2016

Jouanneau, J. S., Kremkow, J., Dorrn, A. L., and Poulet, J. F. (2015). In vivo monosynaptic excitatory transmission between layer 2 cortical pyramidal neurons. *Cell Rep.* 13, 2098–2106. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.11.011

Jouvet, M. (1967). Neurophysiology of the states of sleep. *Physiol. Rev.* 47, 117–177. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1967.47.2.117

Kaas, J. H. (1987). The organization of neocortex in mammals: implications for theories of brain function. *Annu. Rev. Psychol.* 38, 129–151. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001021

Kaas, J. H. (2011). Reconstructing the aral organization of the neocortex of the first mammals. *Brain Behav. Evol.* 78, 7–21. doi: 10.1159/000327316

Kalmbach, B. E., Buchin, A., Long, B., Close, J., Nandi, A., Miller, J. A., et al. (2018). h-channels contribute to divergent intrinsic membrane properties of supragranular pyramidal neurons in human versus mouse cerebral cortex. *Neuron* 100, 1194–1208. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.012

Kalmbach, B. E., Hodge, R. D., Jorstad, N. L., Owen, S., de Frates, R., Yanny, A. M., et al. (2021). Signature morpho-electric, transcriptomic, and dendritic properties of human layer 5 neocortical pyramidal neurons. *Neuron* 109, 2914–2927. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.08.030

Kalmbach, B. E., Johnston, D., and Brager, D. H. (2015). Cell-type specific channelopathies in the prefrontal cortex of the fmr1/-y mouse model of fragile X syndrome. *eNeuro* 2:e1114. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0114-15.2015

Kaminski, J., Call, J., and Fischer, J. (2004). Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for "fast mapping". *Science* 304, 1682–1683. doi: 10.1126/science.1097859

Karbowski, J. (2014). Constancy and trade-offs in the neuroanatomical and metabolic design of the cerebral cortex. *Front. Neural Circuits* 8:9. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00009

Katchman, A. N., and Hershkowitz, N. (1993). Early anoxia-induced vesicular glutamate release results from mobilization of calcium from intracellular stores. *J. Neurophysiol.* 70, 1–7. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.1.1

Katz, L. C. (1987). Local circuitry of identified projection neurons in cat visual cortex brain slices. *J. Neurosci.* 7, 1223–1249. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-04-01223.1987

Kawaguchi, Y. (1995). Physiological subgroups of nonpyramidal cells with specific morphological characteristics in layer II/III of rat frontal cortex. *J. Neurosci.* 15, 2638–2655. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-04-02638.1995

Kawaguchi, Y., and Kubota, Y. (1997). GABAergic cell subtypes and their synaptic connections in rat frontal cortex. *Cereb. Cortex* 7, 476–486. doi: 10.1093/cercor/7.6.476

Kerr, M. I., Wall, M. J., and Richardson, M. J. (2013). Adenosine A1 receptor activation mediates the developmental shift at layer 5 pyramidal cell synapses and is a determinant of mature synaptic strength. *J. Physiol.* 591, 3371–3380. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.244392

Kinnischtzke, A. K., Fanselow, E. E., and Simons, D. J. (2016). Target-specific M1 inputs to infragranular S1 pyramidal neurons. *J. Neurophysiol.* 116, 1261–1274. doi: 10.1152/jn.01032.2015

Kiritani, T., Wickersham, I. R., Seung, H. S., and Shepherd, G. M. (2012). Hierarchical connectivity and connection-specific dynamics in the corticospinal-corticostriatal microcircuit in mouse motor cortex. *J. Neurosci.* 32, 4992–5001. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4759-11.2012

Ko, H., Cossell, L., Baragli, C., Antolik, J., Clopath, C., Hofer, S. B., et al. (2013). The emergence of functional microcircuits in visual cortex. *Nature* 496, 96–100. doi: 10.1038/nature12015

Ko, H., Hofer, S. B., Pichler, B., Buchanan, K. A., Sjostrom, P. J., and Mrsic-Flogel, T. D. (2011). Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks. *Nature* 473, 87–91. doi: 10.1038/nature09880

Koester, H. J., and Johnston, D. (2005). Target cell-dependent normalization of transmitter release at neocortical synapses. *Science* 308, 863–866. doi: 10.1126/science.1100815

Kole, M. H., Hallermann, S., and Stuart, G. J. (2006). Single Ih channels in pyramidal neuron dendrites: properties, distribution, and impact on action potential output. *J. Neurosci.* 26, 1677–1687. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3664-05.2006

Krienen, F. M., Goldman, M., Zhang, Q., R, C. H. D. R., Florio, M., Machold, R., et al. (2020). Innovations present in the primate interneuron repertoire. *Nature* 586, 262–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2781-z

Krubitzer, L., Manger, P., Pettigrew, J., and Calford, M. (1995). Organization of somatosensory cortex in monotremes: in search of the prototypical plan. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 351, 261–306. doi: 10.1002/cne.903510206

Kumar, P., and Ohana, O. (2008). Inter- and intralaminar subcircuits of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in layer 6a of the rat barrel cortex. *J. Neurophysiol.* 100, 1909–1922. doi: 10.1152/jn.90684.2008

Kuzawa, C. W., Chugani, H. T., Grossman, L. I., Lipovich, L., Muzik, O., Hof, P. R., et al. (2014). Metabolic costs and evolutionary implications of human brain development. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.* 111, 13010–13015. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323099111

Lapicque, L. (1926). *L'excitabilité en fonction du temps: La chronaxie, sa signification et sa mesure* (Vol. 4). Les presses universitaires de France.

Larkum, M. E., Kaiser, K. M., and Sakmann, B. (1999). Calcium electrogensis in distal apical dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal cells at a critical frequency of back-propagating action potentials. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.* 96, 14600–14604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.25.14600

Larkum, M. E., Waters, J., Sakmann, B., and Helmchen, F. (2007). Dendritic spikes in apical dendrites of neocortical layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons. *J. Neurosci.* 27, 8999–9008. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1717-07.2007

Larkum, M. E., Zhu, J. J., and Sakmann, B. (2001). Dendritic mechanisms underlying the coupling of the dendritic with the axonal action potential