# THz quantum gap: exploring potential approaches for generating and detecting non-classical states of THz light

Yanko Todorov, Sukhdeep Dhillon, Juliette Mangeney

► To cite this version:

Yanko Todorov, Sukhdeep Dhillon, Juliette Mangeney. THz quantum gap: exploring potential approaches for generating and detecting non-classical states of THz light. Nanophotonics, In press, 10.1515/nanoph-2023-0757. hal-04554454

HAL Id: hal-04554454

https://hal.science/hal-04554454

Submitted on 22 Apr 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# THz quantum gap: exploring potential approaches for generating and detecting non-classical states of THz light

Yanko Todorov, Sukhdeep Dhillon, Juliette Mangeney

► To cite this version:

Yanko Todorov, Sukhdeep Dhillon, Juliette Mangeney. THz quantum gap: exploring potential approaches for generating and detecting non-classical states of THz light. Nanophotonics, 2024, 13 (10), pp.1681-1691. 10.1515/nanoph-2023-0757. hal-04554454

HAL Id: hal-04554454

https://hal.science/hal-04554454v1

Submitted on 22 Apr 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Perspective

Yanko Todorov, Sukhdeep Dhillon and Juliette Mangeney*

# THz quantum gap: exploring potential approaches for generating and detecting non-classical states of THz light

https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0757

Received October 30, 2023; accepted December 30, 2023;

published online January 29, 2024

**Abstract:** Over the past few decades, THz technology has made considerable progress, evidenced by the performance of current THz sources and detectors, as well as the emergence of several THz applications. However, in the realm of quantum technologies, the THz spectral domain is still in its infancy, unlike neighboring spectral domains that have flourished in recent years. Notably, in the microwave domain, superconducting qubits currently serve as the core of quantum computers, while quantum cryptography protocols have been successfully demonstrated in the visible and telecommunications domains through satellite links. The THz domain has lagged behind in these impressive advancements. Today, the current gap in the THz domain clearly concerns quantum technologies. Nonetheless, the emergence of quantum technologies operating at THz frequencies will potentially have a significant impact. Indeed, THz radiation holds significant promise for wireless communications with ultimate security owing to its low sensitivity to atmospheric disturbances. Moreover, it has the potential to raise the operating temperature of solid-state qubits, effectively addressing existing scalability issues. In addition, THz radiation can manipulate the quantum states of molecules, which are recognized as new platforms for quantum computation and simulation with long range interactions. Finally, its ability to penetrate generally opaque materials or its resistance to Rayleigh scattering are very appealing features for quantum sensing. In this perspective, we will discuss potential

approaches that offer exciting prospects for generating and detecting non-classical states of THz light, thereby opening doors to significant breakthroughs in THz quantum technologies.

**Keywords:** terahertz; quantum technology; light-matter interaction; nanostructures

## 1 Introduction

The emerging realm of quantum technologies promises unprecedented advances in fields such as sensing, high-performance computing, simulation, cryptography, and metrology. These technologies have been so far implemented predominantly in the microwave and optical regimes and have an untapped potential in the terahertz (THz) spectral range. Exploiting this frequency domain could have a number of benefits. For instance, quantum cryptography at THz frequencies is of considerable interest for wireless communications with ultimate security, as THz wireless links exhibit attenuation levels several orders of magnitude lower than free-space optical links in the presence of dust, fog, and atmospheric turbulences [1]. In addition, extending the transition frequency of most solid-state qubits (superconducting circuits or semiconductor spins) from the GHz to the THz spectral range will support efforts on increasing the operating temperature of qubits to use a simple ⁴He pumping system and thus overcome the scaling problems posed by limited cooling power of dilution refrigerators below 100 mK. This will also enable qubits to be manipulated at higher speeds. Furthermore, almost all polar molecules exhibit unique spectral signatures in the THz frequency range arising from transitions between rotational quantum levels [2]. As a result, THz radiation can manipulate the quantum states of many molecules, which are recognized as new platforms for quantum computation and simulation with long range interactions [3]. Finally, the ability of THz radiation to penetrate materials that are typically opaque, or its resistance to Rayleigh scattering are

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

<footnote>*Corresponding author: Juliette Mangeney, Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole normale supérieure, ENS, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France, E-mail: Juliette.mangeney@phys.ens.fr.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4354-4257</footnote>

<footnote>Yanko Todorov and Sukhdeep Dhillon, Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole normale supérieure, ENS, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5487-9570 (S. Dhillon)</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Perspective

Yanko Todorov, Sukhdeep Dhillon and Juliette Mangeney*

# THz quantum gap: exploring potential approaches for generating and detecting non-classical states of THz light

https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0757

Received October 30, 2023; accepted December 30, 2023;

published online January 29, 2024

**Abstract:** Over the past few decades, THz technology has made considerable progress, evidenced by the performance of current THz sources and detectors, as well as the emergence of several THz applications. However, in the realm of quantum technologies, the THz spectral domain is still in its infancy, unlike neighboring spectral domains that have flourished in recent years. Notably, in the microwave domain, superconducting qubits currently serve as the core of quantum computers, while quantum cryptography protocols have been successfully demonstrated in the visible and telecommunications domains through satellite links. The THz domain has lagged behind in these impressive advancements. Today, the current gap in the THz domain clearly concerns quantum technologies. Nonetheless, the emergence of quantum technologies operating at THz frequencies will potentially have a significant impact. Indeed, THz radiation holds significant promise for wireless communications with ultimate security owing to its low sensitivity to atmospheric disturbances. Moreover, it has the potential to raise the operating temperature of solid-state qubits, effectively addressing existing scalability issues. In addition, THz radiation can manipulate the quantum states of molecules, which are recognized as new platforms for quantum computation and simulation with long range interactions. Finally, its ability to penetrate generally opaque materials or its resistance to Rayleigh scattering are very appealing features for quantum sensing. In this perspective, we will discuss potential

approaches that offer exciting prospects for generating and detecting non-classical states of THz light, thereby opening doors to significant breakthroughs in THz quantum technologies.

**Keywords:** terahertz; quantum technology; light-matter interaction; nanostructures

## 1 Introduction

The emerging realm of quantum technologies promises unprecedented advances in fields such as sensing, high-performance computing, simulation, cryptography, and metrology. These technologies have been so far implemented predominantly in the microwave and optical regimes and have an untapped potential in the terahertz (THz) spectral range. Exploiting this frequency domain could have a number of benefits. For instance, quantum cryptography at THz frequencies is of considerable interest for wireless communications with ultimate security, as THz wireless links exhibit attenuation levels several orders of magnitude lower than free-space optical links in the presence of dust, fog, and atmospheric turbulences [1]. In addition, extending the transition frequency of most solid-state qubits (superconducting circuits or semiconductor spins) from the GHz to the THz spectral range will support efforts on increasing the operating temperature of qubits to use a simple ⁴He pumping system and thus overcome the scaling problems posed by limited cooling power of dilution refrigerators below 100 mK. This will also enable qubits to be manipulated at higher speeds. Furthermore, almost all polar molecules exhibit unique spectral signatures in the THz frequency range arising from transitions between rotational quantum levels [2]. As a result, THz radiation can manipulate the quantum states of many molecules, which are recognized as new platforms for quantum computation and simulation with long range interactions [3]. Finally, the ability of THz radiation to penetrate materials that are typically opaque, or its resistance to Rayleigh scattering are

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

<footnote>*Corresponding author: Juliette Mangeney, Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole normale supérieure, ENS, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France, E-mail: Juliette.mangeney@phys.ens.fr.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4354-4257</footnote>

<footnote>Yanko Todorov and Sukhdeep Dhillon, Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole normale supérieure, ENS, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5487-9570 (S. Dhillon)</footnote>
very valuable features for quantum applications such as
quantum telecommunications and quantum sensing [4].

Non-classical states of light, such as single photons and squeezed light, are fundamental building blocks of quantum technologies with applications in quantum communication, quantum computation, quantum simulation, quantum sensing [5], [6], and quantum metrology. In this perspective, we will discuss some potential approaches that hold promise for generating and detecting non-classical states of THz light, thereby paving the way for ground breaking advances in THz quantum technologies.

## 2 Generating non-classical states of THz light

In principle, any nonlinear process can produce quantum light [7], [8]. Non-linear optical processes in solid-state materials are the most widely used approach to generating quantum light. Significant progress in the generation of quantum light, including single photons, entangled photon pairs and quadrature-squeezed states, has been made over the last few decades in the fields of optics [9]–[11] and microwaves [12]–[14]. However, in the THz spectral range, the generation of squeezed light has remained elusive until now. In this section, we will present promising approaches, exploiting recent advances in nanostructures, THz components and devices, to produce THz squeezed light.

### 2.1 THz quantum cascade lasers (QCL)

THz QCLs are, to date, the most efficient miniaturized lasers at THz frequencies with impressive improvements in performance over the last few years, including Peltier temperature operation with milliwatt output powers [15]. Their broad gain and controlled group velocity dispersion has recently enabled compact frequency comb (FC) generation, based on four-wave mixing (FWM) processes that take place within the gain medium [16], [17]. This third order nonlinear process permits the generation of quantum correlated spectral modes where, in the simplest form, a strong central mode ($\omega_p$) permits the generation of two correlated sidebands, the signal ($\omega_s$) and idler ($\omega_l$), where $2\omega_p = \omega_s + \omega_l$ (see Figure 1). As a consequence, QCLs are ideal candidates for the generation of multi-mode squeezed states of light. This permits perspectives towards THz quantum photonic platform based on chip scale quantum emitters, enabling the generation of non-classical THz radiation and/or demonstration of entanglement among different comb-emitted modes, in close analogy with squeezing

effects demonstrated 25 years ago in semiconductor bipolar laser diodes [18], [19]. They can then be potentially configured as the founding blocks, in the THz spectral range, for the development of the ultimate sensitivity in spectroscopic and sensing measurements, or to increase capacity, robustness and security of selected free-space quantum communication channels.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1:** Schematic representation of frequency comb formation mechanisms through degenerate and nondegenerate four-wave mixing (FWM). Ref. [20] licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</figcaption></figure>

### 2.2 A two-level system strongly coupled to a THz cavity

Alternative approaches to generating non-classical states of light are based on strong coupling between microcavity photons and quantum emitters, which in this specific case are required to be in the form of a two-level system. The strong coupling regime, achieved when the interaction between the emitter and the cavity mode surpasses the cavity loss and emitter decay, induces large optical nonlinearity at the single photon level that can be harnessed to produce non-classical light exhibiting squeezing properties [21]. As shown in Figure 2, the energy eigenstates of a two-level system strongly coupled on resonance to an optical resonator are grouped into manifolds of two-level dressed states with a non-constant energy difference between consecutive manifolds, leading to anharmonic spacing. A coherent probe beam resonant with the first-order manifold is detuned from transitions to the second manifold. Thus, once a photon is coupled to the system, it suppresses the probability of coupling a second photon of the same frequency, resulting in photon blocking. Similarly, the absorption of a first photon tuned close to the bare cavity resonance enhances the absorption of subsequent photons due to resonance with higher-order manifolds, leading to photon-induced tunneling. As a result of these two effects, the output field acquires sub-Poissonian statistics. The squeezed light stems from
very valuable features for quantum applications such as
quantum telecommunications and quantum sensing [4].

Non-classical states of light, such as single photons and squeezed light, are fundamental building blocks of quantum technologies with applications in quantum communication, quantum computation, quantum simulation, quantum sensing [5], [6], and quantum metrology. In this perspective, we will discuss some potential approaches that hold promise for generating and detecting non-classical states of THz light, thereby paving the way for ground breaking advances in THz quantum technologies.

## 2 Generating non-classical states of THz light

In principle, any nonlinear process can produce quantum light [7], [8]. Non-linear optical processes in solid-state materials are the most widely used approach to generating quantum light. Significant progress in the generation of quantum light, including single photons, entangled photon pairs and quadrature-squeezed states, has been made over the last few decades in the fields of optics [9]–[11] and microwaves [12]–[14]. However, in the THz spectral range, the generation of squeezed light has remained elusive until now. In this section, we will present promising approaches, exploiting recent advances in nanostructures, THz components and devices, to produce THz squeezed light.

### 2.1 THz quantum cascade lasers (QCL)

THz QCLs are, to date, the most efficient miniaturized lasers at THz frequencies with impressive improvements in performance over the last few years, including Peltier temperature operation with milliwatt output powers [15]. Their broad gain and controlled group velocity dispersion has recently enabled compact frequency comb (FC) generation, based on four-wave mixing (FWM) processes that take place within the gain medium [16], [17]. This third order nonlinear process permits the generation of quantum correlated spectral modes where, in the simplest form, a strong central mode ($\omega_p$) permits the generation of two correlated sidebands, the signal ($\omega_s$) and idler ($\omega_l$), where $2\omega_p = \omega_s + \omega_l$ (see Figure 1). As a consequence, QCLs are ideal candidates for the generation of multi-mode squeezed states of light. This permits perspectives towards THz quantum photonic platform based on chip scale quantum emitters, enabling the generation of non-classical THz radiation and/or demonstration of entanglement among different comb-emitted modes, in close analogy with squeezing

effects demonstrated 25 years ago in semiconductor bipolar laser diodes [18], [19]. They can then be potentially configured as the founding blocks, in the THz spectral range, for the development of the ultimate sensitivity in spectroscopic and sensing measurements, or to increase capacity, robustness and security of selected free-space quantum communication channels.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1:** Schematic representation of frequency comb formation mechanisms through degenerate and nondegenerate four-wave mixing (FWM). Ref. [20] licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</figcaption></figure>

### 2.2 A two-level system strongly coupled to a THz cavity

Alternative approaches to generating non-classical states of light are based on strong coupling between microcavity photons and quantum emitters, which in this specific case are required to be in the form of a two-level system. The strong coupling regime, achieved when the interaction between the emitter and the cavity mode surpasses the cavity loss and emitter decay, induces large optical nonlinearity at the single photon level that can be harnessed to produce non-classical light exhibiting squeezing properties [21]. As shown in Figure 2, the energy eigenstates of a two-level system strongly coupled on resonance to an optical resonator are grouped into manifolds of two-level dressed states with a non-constant energy difference between consecutive manifolds, leading to anharmonic spacing. A coherent probe beam resonant with the first-order manifold is detuned from transitions to the second manifold. Thus, once a photon is coupled to the system, it suppresses the probability of coupling a second photon of the same frequency, resulting in photon blocking. Similarly, the absorption of a first photon tuned close to the bare cavity resonance enhances the absorption of subsequent photons due to resonance with higher-order manifolds, leading to photon-induced tunneling. As a result of these two effects, the output field acquires sub-Poissonian statistics. The squeezed light stems from
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2:** THz two-level systems and resonators. (a) A two-level system in cavity (left). Anharmonic spacing of the levels causes phenomena such as photon blockade and photon-induced tunneling (middle). Coherent and squeezed states of light (right). (b) Images of a single graphene quantum dot transistor. Source-drain current versus gate voltage without (black curve) and with THz irradiation at frequencies from 0.27 THz to 0.38 THz (color curves) revealing satellite peaks due to THz photon-assisted tunneling process. Ref. [22] licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. (c) Low-temperature electrical transport through a quantum-dot nanowire single-electron transistor in the dark and illuminated states (right). Images of a planar on-chip split bow-tie antenna and of the prototypical single-electron transistor (left). Ref. [23] licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0. (d) THz photocurrent spectroscopy on H₂O@C₆₀ single molecule transistors, the excitations observed below 10 meV are identified to be the quantum rotational excitations of the water molecule. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from Ref. [24]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society [25]. (e) Q-factor versus the number of complementary resonating metasurfaces (right). Schematic of the THz resonator and simulation result of the focused THz beam at the interface between the front lens and the resonator field (right). Ref. [26] licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. (f) Representation of a Tamm cavity/LC metamaterial coupled LC resonator structure. Electric field enhancement factor in the LC metamaterial plane over a single unit cell (left). Reflection spectra of a Tamm cavity resonant at approximately 0.95 THz coupled with an LC metamaterial resonant at 0.92 THz (right), from Ref. [27]. 2023 Optica Publishing Group.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2:** THz two-level systems and resonators. (a) A two-level system in cavity (left). Anharmonic spacing of the levels causes phenomena such as photon blockade and photon-induced tunneling (middle). Coherent and squeezed states of light (right). (b) Images of a single graphene quantum dot transistor. Source-drain current versus gate voltage without (black curve) and with THz irradiation at frequencies from 0.27 THz to 0.38 THz (color curves) revealing satellite peaks due to THz photon-assisted tunneling process. Ref. [22] licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. (c) Low-temperature electrical transport through a quantum-dot nanowire single-electron transistor in the dark and illuminated states (right). Images of a planar on-chip split bow-tie antenna and of the prototypical single-electron transistor (left). Ref. [23] licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0. (d) THz photocurrent spectroscopy on H₂O@C₆₀ single molecule transistors, the excitations observed below 10 meV are identified to be the quantum rotational excitations of the water molecule. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from Ref. [24]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society [25]. (e) Q-factor versus the number of complementary resonating metasurfaces (right). Schematic of the THz resonator and simulation result of the focused THz beam at the interface between the front lens and the resonator field (right). Ref. [26] licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. (f) Representation of a Tamm cavity/LC metamaterial coupled LC resonator structure. Electric field enhancement factor in the LC metamaterial plane over a single unit cell (left). Reflection spectra of a Tamm cavity resonant at approximately 0.95 THz coupled with an LC metamaterial resonant at 0.92 THz (right), from Ref. [27]. 2023 Optica Publishing Group.</figcaption></figure>
the quantum coherence of photon pairs emitted from the system.

Squeezed light generation based on strong coupling of a two-level system to a cavity has previously been demonstrated in the optical range, for example in an InAs quantum dot coupled to a photonic crystal resonator [28], or in a single atom of Rb placed in a high finesse optical resonator [29]. This technique has also been also implemented in the microwave range, for example using a two-level system based on a Cooper pair box strongly coupled to a microwave coplanar resonator [30]. However, this approach remains elusive in the THz spectral range so far. In the perspective of generating squeezed light in the THz domain, the transition energy of the two-level system must be tuned in the range of few meV and the quality factor $Q$ of the THz resonator must be high.

Two-level systems with THz resonance frequencies are mainly achieved in semiconductor quantum dots, molecules, impurity, and Rydberg atoms (see Figure 2). For instance, graphene quantum dots (QD) [31] of few tens of nanometers in diameter, defined by physical etching [22], [32], display few meV energy level spacings. These graphene QDs are very promising for THz quantum optics because they exhibit an ultrasensitive response to THz photons [33], [34] and a large THz electric dipole ($d \sim 230$ nm) [23]. Currently designed with a transition frequency in the tens of GHz, coupled double QDs obtained by electrostatic confinement in bilayer graphene open interesting perspectives as a two-level system in the THz spectral [35], as this approach prevents from localized states at the graphene edges. Gate defined QDs with a THz frequency transition have been also recently achieved using a carbon nanotube [36], a InAs/InAs$_{0.3}P_{0.7}$ quantum-dot nanowire [37] and a AlGaAs/GaAs two-dimensional electron system [25]. Alternatively, colloidal HgTe QDs of typical diameters ~100 nm, produced by a bottom-up technique, also possess energy level spacing of few meV [24]. Several molecules are also promising as a two-level system in the THz spectral range as their vibrational and rotational modes resonate at THz frequencies. For example, individual molecule of $H_2$ has been revealed as a two-level system with its coherent superposition exhibiting extreme sensitivity to THz electric field [38]. As well, low-energy vibrational modes of a single $C_{60}$ molecule [39] and quantum rotational excitations of a water molecule have been observed in the few meV range [40]. In addition, coherent two- and three-state superpositions of the phosphorus impurity (donor) with hydrogenic states in silicon have been prepared using THz radiation [41]. At last, Rydberg atoms in a thermal vapor are

characterized by strong response to electromagnetic fields with THz transitions between Rydberg levels [42], [43].

THz resonators with a high-quality factor, $Q > 200$, are mostly Fabry-Perot cavities [26], [27], [44], [45]. Their mode volumes are very large because they are limited by diffraction, $V > (\lambda/2)^3$, which leads to very poor overlap with any sub-micrometer two-level system, such as QDs. To overcome this issue, hybrid resonators based on a Fabry-Perot cavity couple to an electronic circuit such as an LC resonator have recently been developed (see Figure 2). Indeed, LC resonators show low $Q$ (~10) but provide subwavelength mode volume, $V < 10^{-5} \lambda^3$ [46]. Hybrid resonators have recently made it possible to achieve both high $Q$ and low $V$ [47], [48]. The optimization of the light-matter interaction with nanoscale quantum objects is also a very relevant topic for quantum detectors of THz photons (see further).

In summary, the building blocks to achieve microcavity coupled two-level THz emitters are well present today. The next step will be to demonstrate THz squeezed radiation states from such systems, which would allow envisioning a road for performing quantum optics experiments in the THz frequency domain. However, significant effort should be provided also on the detector side, as discussed in the next section.

## 2.3 Ultra-strong coupling (USC) regime of THz light-matter interaction

A very intriguing way of generating non-classical light is the dynamical Casimir effect [49]. This effect consists of the generation of photons from the vacuum state in time modulated systems. It was originally described theoretically for a Fabry-Perot cavity, where one of the mirrors is semi-transparent and moving periodically: the periodic modulation of the vacuum creates radiation [50]. This case is the dynamical analogue of the famous Casimir effect, where the vacuum fluctuations create a net force on the mirrors [51]. Another vision for this effect is the Unruh radiation: this occurs from accelerated bodies because the vacuum in an accelerated frame is actually a thermal state with a finite temperature [52]. Very recently, it was theoretically demonstrated that the detection of Unruh radiation generated for very brief acceleration periods is equivalent to the electrooptic sampling of the vacuum [53], linking this physics to recent experiments in the THz spectral range [54], [55].

A first experimental demonstration of the dynamical Casimir effect was published in 2011 from a group of the University of Chalmers [51], who achieved a fast modulation of the modes of a transmission line resonator terminated by an SQUID. In 2005, Ciuti et al. [56] proposed theoretically a
the quantum coherence of photon pairs emitted from the system.

Squeezed light generation based on strong coupling of a two-level system to a cavity has previously been demonstrated in the optical range, for example in an InAs quantum dot coupled to a photonic crystal resonator [28], or in a single atom of Rb placed in a high finesse optical resonator [29]. This technique has also been also implemented in the microwave range, for example using a two-level system based on a Cooper pair box strongly coupled to a microwave coplanar resonator [30]. However, this approach remains elusive in the THz spectral range so far. In the perspective of generating squeezed light in the THz domain, the transition energy of the two-level system must be tuned in the range of few meV and the quality factor $Q$ of the THz resonator must be high.

Two-level systems with THz resonance frequencies are mainly achieved in semiconductor quantum dots, molecules, impurity, and Rydberg atoms (see Figure 2). For instance, graphene quantum dots (QD) [31] of few tens of nanometers in diameter, defined by physical etching [22], [32], display few meV energy level spacings. These graphene QDs are very promising for THz quantum optics because they exhibit an ultrasensitive response to THz photons [33], [34] and a large THz electric dipole ($d \approx 230$ nm) [23]. Currently designed with a transition frequency in the tens of GHz, coupled double QDs obtained by electrostatic confinement in bilayer graphene open interesting perspectives as a two-level system in the THz spectral [35], as this approach prevents from localized states at the graphene edges. Gate defined QDs with a THz frequency transition have been also recently achieved using a carbon nanotube [36], a InAs/InAs$_{0.3}$P$_{0.7}$ quantum-dot nanowire [37] and a AlGaAs/GaAs two-dimensional electron system [25]. Alternatively, colloidal HgTe QDs of typical diameters ~100 nm, produced by a bottom-up technique, also possess energy level spacing of few meV [24]. Several molecules are also promising as a two-level system in the THz spectral range as their vibrational and rotational modes resonate at THz frequencies. For example, individual molecule of H$_2$ has been revealed as a two-level system with its coherent superposition exhibiting extreme sensitivity to THz electric field [38]. As well, low-energy vibrational modes of a single C$_{60}$ molecule [39] and quantum rotational excitations of a water molecule have been observed in the few meV range [40]. In addition, coherent two- and three-state superpositions of the phosphorus impurity (donor) with hydrogenic states in silicon have been prepared using THz radiation [41]. At last, Rydberg atoms in a thermal vapor are

characterized by strong response to electromagnetic fields with THz transitions between Rydberg levels [42], [43].

THz resonators with a high-quality factor, $Q > 200$, are mostly Fabry-Perot cavities [26], [27], [44], [45]. Their mode volumes are very large because they are limited by diffraction, $V > (\lambda/2)^3$, which leads to very poor overlap with any sub-micrometer two-level system, such as QDs. To overcome this issue, hybrid resonators based on a Fabry-Perot cavity couple to an electronic circuit such as an LC resonator have recently been developed (see Figure 2). Indeed, LC resonators show low $Q$ (~10) but provide subwavelength mode volume, $V < 10^{-5} \lambda^3$ [46]. Hybrid resonators have recently made it possible to achieve both high $Q$ and low $V$ [47], [48]. The optimization of the light-matter interaction with nanoscale quantum objects is also a very relevant topic for quantum detectors of THz photons (see further).

In summary, the building blocks to achieve microcavity coupled two-level THz emitters are well present today. The next step will be to demonstrate THz squeezed radiation states from such systems, which would allow envisioning a road for performing quantum optics experiments in the THz frequency domain. However, significant effort should be provided also on the detector side, as discussed in the next section.

## 2.3 Ultra-strong coupling (USC) regime of THz light-matter interaction

A very intriguing way of generating non-classical light is the dynamical Casimir effect [49]. This effect consists of the generation of photons from the vacuum state in time modulated systems. It was originally described theoretically for a Fabry-Perot cavity, where one of the mirrors is semi-transparent and moving periodically: the periodic modulation of the vacuum creates radiation [50]. This case is the dynamical analogue of the famous Casimir effect, where the vacuum fluctuations create a net force on the mirrors [51]. Another vision for this effect is the Unruh radiation: this occurs from accelerated bodies because the vacuum in an accelerated frame is actually a thermal state with a finite temperature [52]. Very recently, it was theoretically demonstrated that the detection of Unruh radiation generated for very brief acceleration periods is equivalent to the electrooptic sampling of the vacuum [53], linking this physics to recent experiments in the THz spectral range [54], [55].

A first experimental demonstration of the dynamical Casimir effect was published in 2011 from a group of the University of Chalmers [51], who achieved a fast modulation of the modes of a transmission line resonator terminated by an SQUID. In 2005, Ciuti et al. [56] proposed theoretically a
radically different approach, based on the electronic transi-
tions in a semiconductor quantum well strongly coupled to
a microcavity mode. Namely, Ciuti et al. examined the case
where the light-matter coupling strength, Ω<sub>R</sub>, becomes a
sizable fraction of the transition frequency ω<sub>21</sub>. One thus
obtains a novel regime of light-matter interaction, dubbed
ultra-strong coupling (USC) regime. This regime is character-
ized by the breakdown of the rotating wave approximation,
usually employed to solve the quantum dynamics of the
system. As illustrated in Figure 3, in this regime the ground
state of the coupled system, |G⟩, can no longer be written
as a tensor product between the ground states of the two
uncoupled systems, |0⟩ ⊗ |F⟩. As a result, the ground state
of the USC system acquires a non-zero population of cavity
photons ⟨G|a†a|G⟩ ∼ (Ω<sub>R</sub>/ω<sub>12</sub>)<sup>2</sup>. Now, if the coupling con-
stant Ω<sub>R</sub> is switched back non-adiabatically to zero, the vac-
uum state does have a zero-photon number ⟨0|a†a|0⟩ = 0,
and the excess of virtual photons present in |G⟩ are released
in a form of correlated pair of real photons. The intensity of
this Casimir radiation depends on the rate on which Ω<sub>R</sub> is
modulated [57]. The excited states of the system, the cavity
polaritons, also acquire non-trivial properties and become
squeezed states [51], [58], [59]. The adequate description of
the emission from such states requires careful theoretical
analysis [60].

Currently, there are many implementations of the USC
regime, across a vast frequency range of the electromag-
netic spectrum [61]. Specifically in the THz range USC has
been achieved with the electronic transitions in highly
doped quantum wells [62], as well as metamaterial-coupled
cyclotron resonances [63]. Yet, experimental evidence of the
intriguing phenomena of dynamical Casimir effect, which
initiated the story of the USC is still missing. In the THz
frequency range, a very promising approach is the ultra-fast
time modulation of the Rabi constant Ω~R~ through optical

pumping, which has been shown both in the case of inter-
subband polaritons [64], as well as Landau level polaritons
[65]. The real obstacle is the detector sensitivity, as the
Casimir radiation is intrinsically very weak. Thus, a real
effort should be provided in building very sensitive THz
detectors, which is the object of the next section. However,
it is clear from the above example that the THz domain
provides both the devices and tools for the experimental
observations of intriguing quantum electrodynamical phe-
nomena that would be difficult to observe in other spectral
domains. Another appealing approach would be to study
USC in the case of few electron systems [34], [66], [67]. In that
case, both the features of the USC and the intrinsic quantum
fermionic non-linearities would contribute for generating
non-classical states of light: still an uncharted territory both
for theoreticians and experimentalists.

3 Detecting non-classical states
of THz light

Because of the ultralow photon energies at THz frequen-
cies, photodetectors in this spectral range are notoriously
underdeveloped and broadband detectors of single pho-
ton or non-classical states of light are nonexistent. Only
one demonstration of a single THz photon detection has
been reported thus far, in a narrow band around 1.5 THz,
using a quantum capacitance detector [68]. In this super-
conducting device, which has a noise-equivalent power of
less than 10<sup>-20</sup> WHz<sup>-1/2</sup>, the free electrons produced by
photons in a superconductor penetrate a small capacitive
island integrated in a resonant circuit. Besides, recent theo-
retical studies have predicted that superconducting magic-
angle bilayer graphene device is capable of detecting single
photons of ultralow energies (i.e. at THz frequencies) by
utilizing its record-low heat capacity and sharp supercon-
ducting transition [69]. Here, we present alternative promis-
ing approaches to detect single THz photon with ability for
photon number resolution.

Of particular interest are single photon detectors that
can be realized with semiconductor nanostructures. Such
realizations have been pioneered from Prof. S. Komiyama's
group from University of Tokyo [70]. The main idea of the
device is to build separate absorbing region in a form of
semiconductor island, separated by strong and controllable
potential barriers from the rest of the device, thus result-
ing in a single-electron transistor. After photon absorption,
the photoexcited electron is transferred in a nearby con-
ducting channel, where it is accelerated towards a read-
out circuit. The key advantage of that device is that the

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3:** An illustration of the dynamical Casimir effect. The ground state of the USC system is not empty but contains virtual cavity photons. An abrupt turning off of the interaction strength Ω<sub>R</sub> brings the system into an uncoupled case where the ground state of the cavity is an ordinary vacuum without photons. The virtual photons in the ground state are then radiated away in a form of correlated pair of real photons [56].</figcaption></figure>
radically different approach, based on the electronic transi-
tions in a semiconductor quantum well strongly coupled to
a microcavity mode. Namely, Ciuti et al. examined the case
where the light-matter coupling strength, Ω<sub>R</sub>, becomes a
sizable fraction of the transition frequency ω<sub>21</sub>. One thus
obtains a novel regime of light-matter interaction, dubbed
ultra-strong coupling (USC) regime. This regime is character-
ized by the breakdown of the rotating wave approximation,
usually employed to solve the quantum dynamics of the
system. As illustrated in Figure 3, in this regime the ground
state of the coupled system, |G⟩, can no longer be written
as a tensor product between the ground states of the two
uncoupled systems, |0⟩ ⊗ |F⟩. As a result, the ground state
of the USC system acquires a non-zero population of cavity
photons ⟨G|a†a|G⟩ ∼ (Ω<sub>R</sub>/ω<sub>12</sub>)<sup>2</sup>. Now, if the coupling con-
stant Ω<sub>R</sub> is switched back non-adiabatically to zero, the vac-
uum state does have a zero-photon number ⟨0|a†a|0⟩ = 0,
and the excess of virtual photons present in |G⟩ are released
in a form of correlated pair of real photons. The intensity of
this Casimir radiation depends on the rate on which Ω<sub>R</sub> is
modulated [57]. The excited states of the system, the cavity
polaritons, also acquire non-trivial properties and become
squeezed states [51], [58], [59]. The adequate description of
the emission from such states requires careful theoretical
analysis [60].

Currently, there are many implementations of the USC
regime, across a vast frequency range of the electromag-
netic spectrum [61]. Specifically in the THz range USC has
been achieved with the electronic transitions in highly
doped quantum wells [62], as well as metamaterial-coupled
cyclotron resonances [63]. Yet, experimental evidence of the
intriguing phenomena of dynamical Casimir effect, which
initiated the story of the USC is still missing. In the THz
frequency range, a very promising approach is the ultra-fast
time modulation of the Rabi constant Ω~R~ through optical

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3:** An illustration of the dynamical Casimir effect. The ground state of the USC system is not empty but contains virtual cavity photons. An abrupt turning off of the interaction strength Ω<sub>R</sub> brings the system into an uncoupled case where the ground state of the cavity is an ordinary vacuum without photons. The virtual photons in the ground state are then radiated away in a form of correlated pair of real photons [56].</figcaption></figure>

pumping, which has been shown both in the case of inter-
subband polaritons [64], as well as Landau level polaritons
[65]. The real obstacle is the detector sensitivity, as the
Casimir radiation is intrinsically very weak. Thus, a real
effort should be provided in building very sensitive THz
detectors, which is the object of the next section. However,
it is clear from the above example that the THz domain
provides both the devices and tools for the experimental
observations of intriguing quantum electrodynamical phe-
nomena that would be difficult to observe in other spectral
domains. Another appealing approach would be to study
USC in the case of few electron systems [34], [66], [67]. In that
case, both the features of the USC and the intrinsic quantum
fermionic non-linearities would contribute for generating
non-classical states of light: still an uncharted territory both
for theoreticians and experimentalists.

3 Detecting non-classical states
of THz light

Because of the ultralow photon energies at THz frequen-
cies, photodetectors in this spectral range are notoriously
underdeveloped and broadband detectors of single pho-
ton or non-classical states of light are nonexistent. Only
one demonstration of a single THz photon detection has
been reported thus far, in a narrow band around 1.5 THz,
using a quantum capacitance detector [68]. In this super-
conducting device, which has a noise-equivalent power of
less than 10<sup>-20</sup> WHz<sup>-1/2</sup>, the free electrons produced by
photons in a superconductor penetrate a small capacitive
island integrated in a resonant circuit. Besides, recent theo-
retical studies have predicted that superconducting magic-
angle bilayer graphene device is capable of detecting single
photons of ultralow energies (i.e. at THz frequencies) by
utilizing its record-low heat capacity and sharp supercon-
ducting transition [69]. Here, we present alternative promis-
ing approaches to detect single THz photon with ability for
photon number resolution.

Of particular interest are single photon detectors that
can be realized with semiconductor nanostructures. Such
realizations have been pioneered from Prof. S. Komiyama's
group from University of Tokyo [70]. The main idea of the
device is to build separate absorbing region in a form of
semiconductor island, separated by strong and controllable
potential barriers from the rest of the device, thus result-
ing in a single-electron transistor. After photon absorption,
the photoexcited electron is transferred in a nearby con-
ducting channel, where it is accelerated towards a read-
out circuit. The key advantage of that device is that the
photon absorption changes the charging state of the insu-
lated island, which can be read-out with a high precision
[66]. Furthermore, the charge excitation has typically very
long lifetime: milliseconds and even seconds [27]. Sensing
a charge difference that corresponds to a single electron is
then equivalent to the readout of an event that corresponds
to the absorption of a single photon.

A first implementation of that idea in the THz range (~1.7 THz) was realized with a single quantum dot under strong magnetic field [71]. The quantum dot was defined by gating 2D electron gas in GaAa/AlGaAs heterostructure. A double-dot device without magnetic field and operating at 500 GHz was also demonstrated [72]. In both cases, impressive NEPs on the order of 10<sup>-21</sup> W/Hz<sup>0.5</sup> were reported by the authors. In the microwave, that approach has been the subject of several theoretical studies. Modeling predicts that a double quantum dots nearby a charge detector, coupled to a high-Q microwave cavity, enable single photon detection

and furthermore photon counting [73], [74] (see Figure 4).
Indeed, for ideal, unity efficiency detection, the fluctuations
of the charge current reproduce the statistics of the incom-
ing photons [75].

Another implementation was achieved in the mid-infrared range, in the wavelength range $\lambda = 9 \ \mu\text{m}-15 \ \mu\text{m}$. In that case the detector design makes use of the same type of band-structure engineering that is used for unipolar devices [77]. The absorbing island is obtained from a thin quantum well that is connected with a conducting source-drain channel trough a triangular barrier [78]. The device, called charge sensitive infrared phototransistor (CSIP) is processed in a transistor architecture with several gates, which allow lateral insulation of the thin well as well as a reset action. Typically, the device is operated in a non-stationary regime, where the source-drain current increases slowly with time owe to the transfer of photoexcited electrons. This is the

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4:** Detection of non-classical states of light. (a) Working principle of a single-photon detector in the microwave range formed by two capacitively coupled GaAs/AlₓGa₁₋ₓAsGaAs/AlₓGa₁₋ₓAs parallel quantum dots. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [68], Copyright 2002, American Chemical Society. (b) Schematic representation and a microscope image of a charge-sensitive infrared phototransistors (up). Time trace of the photocurrent at a temperature of 14 K. The histogram of the frequency of stepwise. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [74], Copyright 2002, American Chemical Society. (c) Cartoon pictures of the process leading to a THz transport gap in a carbon nanotube quantum dot (up). SEM picture of the devices: the THz cavity is capacitively coupled to the QD in the carbon nanotube (bottom). Ref. [34] licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. (d) Resistance for a reference Hall bar (black lines) and for a complementary THz split-ring 140 GHz resonator embedding a Hall bar revealing a breakdown of the topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [76], reprinted with permission from AAAS.</figcaption></figure>
photon absorption changes the charging state of the insu-
lated island, which can be read-out with a high precision
[66]. Furthermore, the charge excitation has typically very
long lifetime: milliseconds and even seconds [27]. Sensing
a charge difference that corresponds to a single electron is
then equivalent to the readout of an event that corresponds
to the absorption of a single photon.

A first implementation of that idea in the THz range (~1.7 THz) was realized with a single quantum dot under strong magnetic field [71]. The quantum dot was defined by gating 2D electron gas in GaAa/AlGaAs heterostructure. A double-dot device without magnetic field and operating at 500 GHz was also demonstrated [72]. In both cases, impressive NEPs on the order of 10<sup>-21</sup> W/Hz<sup>0.5</sup> were reported by the authors. In the microwave, that approach has been the subject of several theoretical studies. Modeling predicts that a double quantum dots nearby a charge detector, coupled to a high-Q microwave cavity, enable single photon detection

and furthermore photon counting [73], [74] (see Figure 4).
Indeed, for ideal, unity efficiency detection, the fluctuations
of the charge current reproduce the statistics of the incom-
ing photons [75].

Another implementation was achieved in the mid-infrared range, in the wavelength range $\lambda = 9 \mu m - 15 \mu m$. In that case the detector design makes use of the same type of band-structure engineering that is used for unipolar devices [77]. The absorbing island is obtained from a thin quantum well that is connected with a conducting source-drain channel trough a triangular barrier [78]. The device, called charge sensitive infrared phototransistor (CSIP) is processed in a transistor architecture with several gates, which allow lateral insulation of the thin well as well as a reset action. Typically, the device is operated in a non-stationary regime, where the source-drain current increases slowly with time owe to the transfer of photoexcited electrons. This is the

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4:** Detection of non-classical states of light. (a) Working principle of a single-photon detector in the microwave range formed by two capacitively coupled GaAs/AlₓGa₁₋ₓAsGaAs/AlₓGa₁₋ₓAs parallel quantum dots. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [68], Copyright 2002, American Chemical Society. (b) Schematic representation and a microscope image of a charge-sensitive infrared phototransistors (up). Time trace of the photocurrent at a temperature of 14 K. The histogram of the frequency of stepwise. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [74], Copyright 2002, American Chemical Society. (c) Cartoon pictures of the process leading to a THz transport gap in a carbon nanotube quantum dot (up). SEM picture of the devices: the THz cavity is capacitively coupled to the QD in the carbon nanotube (bottom). Ref. [34] licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. (d) Resistance for a reference Hall bar (black lines) and for a complementary THz split-ring 140 GHz resonator embedding a Hall bar revealing a breakdown of the topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [76], reprinted with permission from AAAS.</figcaption></figure>
regime of photon counting. For devices where the absorb-
ing area is small enough (~10 µm²), the variations of the
source-drain current are step-like, where each step corre-
sponds to the detection of a photon [79]. Statistics of the
size of the current steps can be related to the statistics of
the photon source. In Ref. [74] this was demonstrated with
a thermal source, where the authors observed a Poissonian
distribution of the photon arrival events. Clearly, it is very
appealing to apply the same type of detector scheme to
quantum sources, where one wants to observe the quan-
tum fluctuations of the source. Another very interesting
perspective is to combine several CSIP devices in order
to perform time-delayed correlation measurements of the
source. However, in order to reach ultimate sensitivity of
CSIPs it is imperative to reduce as much as possible its
absorbing area, such as the absorption of a single photon
roughly corresponds to the read-out of a single photoexcited
electron [74]. To achieve this ambitious task, an interesting
perspective is to employ advanced photonic architectures
such as antenna-coupled metamaterials [80]–[83]. The THz
range is particularly suitable for such studies, as relatively
low metal loss, long wavelengths and advanced nanofab-
rication techniques allow exploring complex geometries
for optimized subwavelength light confinement [27], [78],
[84]. It should also be noted that such strategies can also
lead to an improved quantum efficiency of the detectors,
which has been reported to be rather low 0.1%–1% [67],
[68], [74]. The low quantum efficiency is nevertheless not
always an issue in quantum optical experiments, as the sec-
ond order correlation function $g_2(0)$ is independent from it
[76].

Another line of research is exploring devices operat-
ing in the ultra-strong light matter coupling regime (see
Figure 4(c) and (d)). In the MIR range, this research work
has been going on for at least two decades, and has been
concerning mainly unipolar detector devices [85]–[87]. The
latter are formidable platform for exploring the interplay
between electronic transport and light-matter interaction,
however still underemployed at THz frequencies. In the THz
frequency range, new types of devices have been emerging
[34], [35], [88], with the specific task to probe the quantum
fluctuations induced by the USC regime [89]. Clearly, we
arrive at a point where the THz community can strongly
benefit from these developments, which are highly appeal-
ing for the realization of practical THz single-photon detec-
tors and, more generally, the detection of non-classical states
of THz light.

Furthermore, detecting the multi-mode squeezed states
of light potentially generated by QCLs is a challenging task.
Despite improvements over the last few years [90], detecting

these quantum states requires improvements in quantum
efficiency of THz detectors, such as those based around
graphene transistors and improving their response through,
for example, reducing the channel lengths [54], [55]. An
alternative approach would be the use of coherent detec-
tion in the temporal domain using sampling techniques.
This approach permits the sensitive detection of the time
resolved electric field and has been applied to give the
direct aspect of vacuum fluctuations in the mid-infrared
[91]. Recent work has extended such concepts to show elec-
tric field correlations of THz pulses using cooled electro-
optic crystals [92]. However, the response of this approach
reduces at high THz frequencies (where THz QCLs oper-
ate), despite recent important investigations using on-chip
electro-optic geometries. Coherent ultrafast THz photocon-
ductive detectors can provide a potential solution here
where their performances can be enhanced by engineering
their THz and optical response. For example, the photocon-
ductive material can be engineered into a resonant THz
metal-insulator-metal cavity [93], permitting the coherent
response to be enhanced by a factor 10 at high THz fre-
quencies. Further, this can be combined with plasmonic
interdigitated top contacts to simultaneously enhance the
collection efficiency of the photoexcited carriers and the
photon absorption [94]. On the actual THz QCL side, consid-
erable efforts are being made in realising harmonic comb
operation [95] to produce a spectrum of equidistant modes
separated in frequency by a multiple (two to tens) of the
natural Fabry–Perot mode spacing defined by the laser cav-
ity. The advantage of a harmonic comb is that it distributes
its optical power among few high-power modes, in contrast
to the many weaker adjacent cavity modes of a standard
dense comb. As well as facilitating the possibility of detect-
ing quantum correlations, this enables the modes of the
QCL to be easily separated (using for example, gratings) for
correlation measurements.

**4 Conclusion: the THz quantum gap**

For many decades, the THz frequency range was referred as
a technological gap in terms of the lack of viable solutions
for the generation and detection of THz waves [96]. In the
recent years, we have been witnessing impressive develop-
ments in terms of both emitters and detectors with com-
mercial applications [97]. Today, the actual THz gap clearly
concerns quantum technologies that have been flourishing
in the neighboring spectral domains. In the microwave,
superconducting qubits are currently at heart of quan-
tum computers developed both by academia as well as
regime of photon counting. For devices where the absorb-
ing area is small enough (~10 µm²), the variations of the
source-drain current are step-like, where each step corre-
sponds to the detection of a photon [79]. Statistics of the
size of the current steps can be related to the statistics of
the photon source. In Ref. [74] this was demonstrated with
a thermal source, where the authors observed a Poissonian
distribution of the photon arrival events. Clearly, it is very
appealing to apply the same type of detector scheme to
quantum sources, where one wants to observe the quan-
tum fluctuations of the source. Another very interesting
perspective is to combine several CSIP devices in order
to perform time-delayed correlation measurements of the
source. However, in order to reach ultimate sensitivity of
CSIPs it is imperative to reduce as much as possible its
absorbing area, such as the absorption of a single photon
roughly corresponds to the read-out of a single photoexcited
electron [74]. To achieve this ambitious task, an interesting
perspective is to employ advanced photonic architectures
such as antenna-coupled metamaterials [80]–[83]. The THz
range is particularly suitable for such studies, as relatively
low metal loss, long wavelengths and advanced nanofab-
rication techniques allow exploring complex geometries
for optimized subwavelength light confinement [27], [78],
[84]. It should also be noted that such strategies can also
lead to an improved quantum efficiency of the detectors,
which has been reported to be rather low 0.1%–1% [67],
[68], [74]. The low quantum efficiency is nevertheless not
always an issue in quantum optical experiments, as the sec-
ond order correlation function $g_2(0)$ is independent from it
[76].

Another line of research is exploring devices operat-
ing in the ultra-strong light matter coupling regime (see
Figure 4(c) and (d)). In the MIR range, this research work
has been going on for at least two decades, and has been
concerning mainly unipolar detector devices [85]–[87]. The
latter are formidable platform for exploring the interplay
between electronic transport and light-matter interaction,
however still underemployed at THz frequencies. In the THz
frequency range, new types of devices have been emerging
[34], [35], [88], with the specific task to probe the quantum
fluctuations induced by the USC regime [89]. Clearly, we
arrive at a point where the THz community can strongly
benefit from these developments, which are highly appeal-
ing for the realization of practical THz single-photon detec-
tors and, more generally, the detection of non-classical states
of THz light.

Furthermore, detecting the multi-mode squeezed states
of light potentially generated by QCLs is a challenging task.
Despite improvements over the last few years [90], detecting

these quantum states requires improvements in quantum
efficiency of THz detectors, such as those based around
graphene transistors and improving their response through,
for example, reducing the channel lengths [54], [55]. An
alternative approach would be the use of coherent detec-
tion in the temporal domain using sampling techniques.
This approach permits the sensitive detection of the time
resolved electric field and has been applied to give the
direct aspect of vacuum fluctuations in the mid-infrared
[91]. Recent work has extended such concepts to show elec-
tric field correlations of THz pulses using cooled electro-
optic crystals [92]. However, the response of this approach
reduces at high THz frequencies (where THz QCLs oper-
ate), despite recent important investigations using on-chip
electro-optic geometries. Coherent ultrafast THz photocon-
ductive detectors can provide a potential solution here
where their performances can be enhanced by engineering
their THz and optical response. For example, the photocon-
ductive material can be engineered into a resonant THz
metal-insulator-metal cavity [93], permitting the coherent
response to be enhanced by a factor 10 at high THz fre-
quencies. Further, this can be combined with plasmonic
interdigitated top contacts to simultaneously enhance the
collection efficiency of the photoexcited carriers and the
photon absorption [94]. On the actual THz QCL side, consid-
erable efforts are being made in realising harmonic comb
operation [95] to produce a spectrum of equidistant modes
separated in frequency by a multiple (two to tens) of the
natural Fabry–Perot mode spacing defined by the laser cav-
ity. The advantage of a harmonic comb is that it distributes
its optical power among few high-power modes, in contrast
to the many weaker adjacent cavity modes of a standard
dense comb. As well as facilitating the possibility of detect-
ing quantum correlations, this enables the modes of the
QCL to be easily separated (using for example, gratings) for
correlation measurements.

4 Conclusion: the THz quantum gap

For many decades, the THz frequency range was referred as
a technological gap in terms of the lack of viable solutions
for the generation and detection of THz waves [96]. In the
recent years, we have been witnessing impressive develop-
ments in terms of both emitters and detectors with com-
mercial applications [97]. Today, the actual THz gap clearly
concerns quantum technologies that have been flourishing
in the neighboring spectral domains. In the microwave,
superconducting qubits are currently at heart of quan-
tum computers developed both by academia as well as
high tech startups and companies. In the visible and tele-
com domain, quantum cryptography protocols have been
demonstrated with satellite links. The THz domain, how-
ever, has been considerably lagged behind these impressive
developments, despite a high potential to bring together the
best of the microwave and optical regions. Based on the
results shown in the current perspective, we believe that
this situation could change in the next decades, as the THz
domain shows a plethora of new opportunities for the devel-
opment of quantum technologies. We now dispose of all
building blocks not only to provide quantum technologies
in line with those from the other spectral ranges, but also to
open new opportunities. Indeed, the THz spectral domain
holds the promise of enhanced wireless communication
security, raising the operating temperature of solid-state
qubits, enabling new quantum computation and simulation
platforms through the manipulation of quantum states in
molecules, and offering valuable perspectives for quantum
sensing applications. Furthermore, the USC regime which
has been already demonstrated with THz devices will per-
mit to explore completely new quantum mechanical con-
cepts such as ultrafast quantum gates [98], non-adiabatic
electrodynamics [99] and probing fundamental quantum
fluctuation [89], [92]. Also, given rapid advances being made
in new quantum materials, such as 2D materials [100],
and their easy coupling to Si-photonics, there is a realis-
tic prospect of integrated devices for THz quantum optics
on-chip, thus providing new platforms for developing THz
quantum technologies.

**Research funding:** YT acknowledges financial support by the European Union's ERC-COG- 863487 "UNIQUE". SD acknowledges financial support by the European Union's QuantERA II [G.A.n. 101017733] – QATACOMB Project". JM acknowledges financial support by the European Union's ERC Consolidator Grant LEON (Grant No. 820133), by FLAG-ERA Grant THINQ by ANR-23-GRF1-0002-01, by ANR Grant QuickTera (No. ANR-22-CE09-0018) and STEM2D (No. ANR-19-CE24-0015).

**Author contributions:** All authors have accepted responsi-
bility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved
its submission.

**Conflict of interest:** Authors state no conflicts of interest.

**Informed consent:** Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

**Ethical approval:** The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use.

**Data availability:** Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] K. Su, L. Moeller, R. B. Barat, and J. F. Federici, "Experimental comparison of performance degradation from terahertz and infrared wireless links in fog," *J. Opt. Soc. Am. A*, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 179, 2012.

[2] D. Mittleman, R. Jacobsen, R. Neelamani, R. G. Baraniuk, and M. C. Nuss, "Gas sensing using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy," *Appl. Phys. B*, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 379–390, 1998.

[3] K. Najafian, Z. Meir, and S. Willitsch, "From megahertz to terahertz qubits encoded in molecular ions: theoretical analysis of dipole-forbidden spectroscopic transitions in $N_2$," *Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.*, vol. 22, no. 40, p. 23083, 2020.

[4] M. Kutas, B. Haase, P. Bickert, F. Riexinger, D. Molter, and G. von Freymann, "Terahertz quantum sensing," *Sci. Adv.*, vol. 6, no. 11, p. eaaz8065, 2020.

[5] B. J. Lawrie, P. D. Lett, A. M. Marino, and R. C. Pooser, "Quantum sensing with squeezed light," *ACS Photonics*, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1307–1318, 2019.

[6] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, "Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit," *Science*, vol. 306, no. 5700, pp. 1330–1336, 2004.

[7] D. F. Walls, "Squeezed states of light," *Nature*, vol. 306, no. 5939, p. 141, 1983.

[8] U. L. Andersen, T. Gehring, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, "30 years of squeezed light generation," *Phys. Scr.*, vol. 91, no. 5, p. 053001, 2016.

[9] H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, "Detection of 15 dB squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency," *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 117, no. 11, p. 110801, 2016.

[10] G. Moody, L. Chang, T. J. Steiner, and J. E. Bowers, "Chip-scale nonlinear photonics for quantum light generation," *AVS Quant. Sci.*, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 041702, 2020.

[11] J. Bauchrowitz, T. Westphal, and R. Schnabel, "A graphical description of optical parametric generation of squeezed states of light," *Am. J. Phys.*, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 767–771, 2013.

[12] M. Castellanos-Beltran, K. Irwin, G. Hilton, L. R. Vale, and K. W. Lehnert, "Amplification and squeezing of quantum noise with a tunable Josephson metamaterial," *Nat. Phys.*, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 929–931, 2008.

[13] M. Malnou, D. A. Palken, L. R. Vale, G. C. Hilton, and K. W. Lehnert, "Optimal operation of a josephson parametric amplifier for vacuum squeezing," *Phys. Rev. Appl.*, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 044023, 2018.

[14] J. Li, Y.-P. Wang, J.-Q. You, and S.-Y. Zhu, "Squeezing microwaves by magnetostriction," *Natl. Sci. Rev.*, vol. 10, no. 5, p. nwac247, 2023.

[15] A. Khalatpour, A. K. Paulsen, C. Deimert, Z. R. Wasilewski, and Q. Hu, "High-power portable terahertz laser systems," *Nat. Photonics*, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 16–20, 2021.

[16] D. Burghoff, et al., "Terahertz laser frequency combs," *Nat. Photonics*, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 462–467, 2014.

[17] J. Faist, et al., "Quantum cascade laser frequency combs," *Nanophotonics*, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 272–291, 2016.

[18] F. Marin, et al., "Squeezing and intermode correlations in laser diodes," *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 75, no. 25, p. 4606, 1995.

[19] M. C. Teich, F. Capasso, and B. E. A. Saleh, "Photon-number-squeezed recombination radiation in
high tech startups and companies. In the visible and tele-
com domain, quantum cryptography protocols have been
demonstrated with satellite links. The THz domain, how-
ever, has been considerably lagged behind these impressive
developments, despite a high potential to bring together the
best of the microwave and optical regions. Based on the
results shown in the current perspective, we believe that
this situation could change in the next decades, as the THz
domain shows a plethora of new opportunities for the devel-
opment of quantum technologies. We now dispose of all
building blocks not only to provide quantum technologies
in line with those from the other spectral ranges, but also to
open new opportunities. Indeed, the THz spectral domain
holds the promise of enhanced wireless communication
security, raising the operating temperature of solid-state
qubits, enabling new quantum computation and simulation
platforms through the manipulation of quantum states in
molecules, and offering valuable perspectives for quantum
sensing applications. Furthermore, the USC regime which
has been already demonstrated with THz devices will per-
mit to explore completely new quantum mechanical con-
cepts such as ultrafast quantum gates [98], non-adiabatic
electrodynamics [99] and probing fundamental quantum
fluctuation [89], [92]. Also, given rapid advances being made
in new quantum materials, such as 2D materials [100],
and their easy coupling to Si-photonics, there is a realis-
tic prospect of integrated devices for THz quantum optics
on-chip, thus providing new platforms for developing THz
quantum technologies.

**Research funding:** YT acknowledges financial support by the European Union's ERC-COG- 863487 "UNIQUE". SD acknowledges financial support by the European Union's QuantERA II [G.A.n. 101017733] – QATACOMB Project". JM acknowledges financial support by the European Union's ERC Consolidator Grant LEON (Grant No. 820133), by FLAG-ERA Grant THINQ by ANR-23-GRF1-0002-01, by ANR Grant QuickTera (No. ANR-22-CE09-0018) and STEM2D (No. ANR-19-CE24-0015).

**Author contributions:** All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

**Conflict of interest:** Authors state no conflicts of interest.

**Informed consent:** Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

**Ethical approval:** The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use.

**Data availability:** Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] K. Su, L. Moeller, R. B. Barat, and J. F. Federici, "Experimental comparison of performance degradation from terahertz and infrared wireless links in fog," *J. Opt. Soc. Am. A*, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 179, 2012.

[2] D. Mittleman, R. Jacobsen, R. Neelamani, R. G. Baraniuk, and M. C. Nuss, "Gas sensing using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy," *Appl. Phys. B*, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 379–390, 1998.

[3] K. Najafian, Z. Meir, and S. Willitsch, "From megahertz to terahertz qubits encoded in molecular ions: theoretical analysis of dipole-forbidden spectroscopic transitions in $N_2$," *Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.*, vol. 22, no. 40, p. 23083, 2020.

[4] M. Kutas, B. Haase, P. Bickert, F. Riexinger, D. Molter, and G. von Freymann, "Terahertz quantum sensing," *Sci. Adv.*, vol. 6, no. 11, p. eaaz8065, 2020.

[5] B. J. Lawrie, P. D. Lett, A. M. Marino, and R. C. Pooser, "Quantum sensing with squeezed light," *ACS Photonics*, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1307–1318, 2019.

[6] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, "Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit," *Science*, vol. 306, no. 5700, pp. 1330–1336, 2004.

[7] D. F. Walls, "Squeezed states of light," *Nature*, vol. 306, no. 5939, p. 141, 1983.

[8] U. L. Andersen, T. Gehring, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, "30 years of squeezed light generation," *Phys. Scr.*, vol. 91, no. 5, p. 053001, 2016.

[9] H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, "Detection of 15 dB squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency," *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 117, no. 11, p. 110801, 2016.

[10] G. Moody, L. Chang, T. J. Steiner, and J. E. Bowers, "Chip-scale nonlinear photonics for quantum light generation," *AVS Quant. Sci.*, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 041702, 2020.

[11] J. Bauchrowitz, T. Westphal, and R. Schnabel, "A graphical description of optical parametric generation of squeezed states of light," *Am. J. Phys.*, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 767–771, 2013.

[12] M. Castellanos-Beltran, K. Irwin, G. Hilton, L. R. Vale, and K. W. Lehnert, "Amplification and squeezing of quantum noise with a tunable Josephson metamaterial," *Nat. Phys.*, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 929–931, 2008.

[13] M. Malnou, D. A. Palken, L. R. Vale, G. C. Hilton, and K. W. Lehnert, "Optimal operation of a josephson parametric amplifier for vacuum squeezing," *Phys. Rev. Appl.*, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 044023, 2018.

[14] J. Li, Y.-P. Wang, J.-Q. You, and S.-Y. Zhu, "Squeezing microwaves by magnetostriction," *Natl. Sci. Rev.*, vol. 10, no. 5, p. nwac247, 2023.

[15] A. Khalatpour, A. K. Paulsen, C. Deimert, Z. R. Wasilewski, and Q. Hu, "High-power portable terahertz laser systems," *Nat. Photonics*, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 16–20, 2021.

[16] D. Burghoff, et al., "Terahertz laser frequency combs," *Nat. Photonics*, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 462–467, 2014.

[17] J. Faist, et al., "Quantum cascade laser frequency combs," *Nanophotonics*, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 272–291, 2016.

[18] F. Marin, et al., "Squeezing and intermode correlations in laser diodes," *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 75, no. 25, p. 4606, 1995.

[19] M. C. Teich, F. Capasso, and B. E. A. Saleh, "Photon-number-squeezed recombination radiation in
semiconductors,” *J. Opt. Soc. Am. B*, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1663–1666, 1987.

[20] M. S. Vitiello, L. Consolino, M. Inguscio, and P. De Natale, “Toward new frontiers for terahertz quantum cascade laser frequency combs,” *Nanophotonics*, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 187–194, 2021.

[21] L. Shan, et al., “Generation and modulation of non-classical light in a strongly coupled photon–emitter system,” *Photon. Res.*, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 989–998, 2022.

[22] L. A. Ponomarenko, et al., “Chaotic Dirac billiard in graphene quantum dots,” *Science*, vol. 320, no. 5874, p. 356, 2008.

[23] S. Messelot, et al., “Large terahertz electric dipole of a single graphene quantum dot,” *Phys. Rev. Res.*, vol. 4, no. 1, p. L012018, 2022.

[24] T. Apretna, et al., “Few picosecond dynamics of intraband transitions in THz HgTe nanocrystals,” *Nanophotonics*, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 2753–2763, 2021.

[25] K. Kuroyama, J. Kwoen, Y. Arakawa, and K. Hirakawa, “Coherent interaction of a-few-electron quantum dot with a terahertz optical resonator,” arXiv:2204.10522, 2023.

[26] F. Hindle, R. Bocquet, A. Pienkina, A. Cuisset, and G. Mouret, “Terahertz gas phase spectroscopy using a high-finesse Fabry–Pérot cavity,” *Optica*, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1449–1454, 2019.

[27] S. Messelot, et al., “Tamm cavity in the terahertz spectral range,” *ACS Photonics*, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 2906–2914, 2020.

[28] A. Faraon, I. Fushman, D. Englund, N. Stoltz, P. Petroff, and J. Vučković, “Coherent generation of non-classical light on a chip via photon-induced tunnelling and blockade,” *Nat. Phys.*, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 859–863, 2008.

[29] A. Ourjoumtsev, et al., “Observation of squeezed light from one atom excited with two photons,” *Nature*, vol. 474, no. 7353, pp. 623–626, 2011.

[30] S. Rebić, J. Twamley, and G. J. Milburn, “Giant kerr nonlinearities in circuit quantum electrodynamics,” *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 103, no. 15, p. 150503, 2009.

[31] B. Trauzettel, D. V. Bulaev, D. Loss, and G. Burkard, “Spin qubits in graphene quantum dots,” *Nat. Phys.*, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 192, 2007.

[32] J. Güttinger, et al., “Transport through graphene quantum dots,” *Rep. Prog. Phys.*, vol. 75, no. 12, p. 126502, 2012.

[33] E. Riccardi, et al., “Ultrasensitive photoresponse of graphene quantum dots in the coulomb blockade regime to THz radiation,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 20, no. 7, p. 5408, 2020.

[34] A. El Fatimy, R. L. Myers-Ward, A. K. Boyd, K. M. Daniels, D. K. Gaskill, and P. Barbara, “Epitaxial graphene quantum dots for high-performance terahertz bolometers,” *Nat. Nanotechnol.*, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 335, 2016.

[35] L. Banszerus, et al., “Electron-hole crossover in gate-controlled bilayer graphene quantum dots,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 20, no. 10, p. 7709, 2020.

[36] F. Valmorra, et al., “Vacuum-field-induced THz transport gap in a carbon nanotube quantum dot,” *Nat. Commun.*, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 5490, 2021.

[37] M. Asgari, et al., “Quantum-dot single-electron transistors as thermoelectric quantum detectors at terahertz frequencies,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 21, no. 20, pp. 8587–8594, 2021.

[38] L. Wang, Y. Xia, and W. Ho, “Atomic-scale quantum sensing based on the ultrafast coherence of an H2 molecule in an STM cavity,” *Science*, vol. 376, no. 6591, pp. 401–405, 2022.

[39] S. Du, K. Yoshida, Y. Zhang, I. Hamada, and K. Hirakawa, “Terahertz dynamics of electron–vibron coupling in single

molecules with tunable electrostatic potential,” *Nat. Photonics*, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 608–612, 2018.

[40] S. Du, et al., “Inelastic electron transport and ortho–para fluctuation of water molecule in H2O@C60 single molecule transistors,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 10346–10353, 2021.

[41] S. Chick, et al., “Coherent superpositions of three states for phosphorous donors in silicon prepared using THz radiation,” *Nat. Commun.*, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 16038, 2017.

[42] S. Chen, et al., “Terahertz electrometry via infrared spectroscopy of atomic vapor,” *Optica*, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 485–491, 2022.

[43] B. Liu, et al., “Electric field measurement and application based on Rydberg atoms,” *Electromagn. Sci.*, vol. 1, no. 2, 2023, Art. no. 0020151.

[44] C. M. Yee and M. S. Sherwin, “High-Q terahertz microcavities in silicon photonic crystal slabs,” *Appl. Phys. Lett.*, vol. 94, no. 15, p. 154104, 2009.

[45] Q. Zhang, et al., “Collective non-perturbative coupling of 2D electrons with high-quality-factor terahertz cavity photons,” *Nature Physics*, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1005–1011, 2016.

[46] S. Rajabali, et al., “An ultrastrongly coupled single terahertz meta-atom,” *Nat. Commun.*, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1, 2022.

[47] F. Meng, M. D. Thomson, B. Klug, and H. G. Roskos, “Strong interaction between two photons and a plasmon of a complementary metamaterial in a terahertz dual cavity,” *Opt. Express*, vol. 29, no. 26, p. 42420, 2021.

[48] S. Messelot, S. Coeymans, J. Tignon, S. Dhillon, and J. Manganey, “High Q and sub-wavelength THz electric field confinement in ultrastrongly coupled THz resonators,” *Photon. Res.*, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1203–1216, 2023.

[49] V. Dodonov, “Fifty years of the dynamical Casimir effect,” *Physics*, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 67–104, 2020.

[50] G. T. Moore, “Quantum theory of the electromagnetic field in a variable-length one-dimensional cavity,” *J. Math. Phys.*, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 2679–2691, 1970.

[51] C. M. Wilson, et al., “Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit,” *Nature*, vol. 479, no. 7373, pp. 376–379, 2011.

[52] W. G. Unruh, “Notes on black-hole evaporation,” *Phys. Rev. D*, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 870, 1976.

[53] S. Onoe, T. L. M. Guedes, A. S. Moskalenko, A. Leitenstorfer, G. Burkard, and T. C. Ralph, “Realizing a rapidly switched Unruh–DeWitt detector through electro-optic sampling of the electromagnetic vacuum,” *Phys. Rev. D*, vol. 105, no. 5, p. 056023, 2022.

[54] L. Viti, D. G. Purdie, A. Lombardo, A. C. Ferrari, and M. S. Vitiello, “HBN-encapsulated, graphene-based, room-temperature terahertz receivers, with high speed and low noise,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 3169–3177, 2020.

[55] L. Viti, et al., “Thermoelectric graphene photodetectors with sub-nanosecond response times at terahertz frequencies,” *Nanophotonics*, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2021.

[56] C. Ciuti, G. Bastard, and I. Carusotto, “Quantum vacuum properties of the intersubband cavity polariton field,” *Phys. Rev. B*, vol. 72, no. 11, p. 115303, 2005.

[57] S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, and I. Carusotto, “Quantum vacuum radiation spectra from a semiconductor microcavity with a time-modulated vacuum Rabi frequency,” *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 98, no. 10, p. 103602, 2007.
semiconductors,” *J. Opt. Soc. Am. B*, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1663–1666, 1987.

[20] M. S. Vitiello, L. Consolino, M. Inguscio, and P. De Natale, “Toward new frontiers for terahertz quantum cascade laser frequency combs,” *Nanophotonics*, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 187–194, 2021.

[21] L. Shan, et al., “Generation and modulation of non-classical light in a strongly coupled photon–emitter system,” *Photon. Res.*, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 989–998, 2022.

[22] L. A. Ponomarenko, et al., “Chaotic Dirac billiard in graphene quantum dots,” *Science*, vol. 320, no. 5874, p. 356, 2008.

[23] S. Messelot, et al., “Large terahertz electric dipole of a single graphene quantum dot,” *Phys. Rev. Res.*, vol. 4, no. 1, p. L012018, 2022.

[24] T. Apretna, et al., “Few picosecond dynamics of intraband transitions in THz HgTe nanocrystals,” *Nanophotonics*, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 2753–2763, 2021.

[25] K. Kuroyama, J. Kwoen, Y. Arakawa, and K. Hirakawa, “Coherent interaction of a-few-electron quantum dot with a terahertz optical resonator,” arXiv:2204.10522, 2023.

[26] F. Hindle, R. Bocquet, A. Pienkina, A. Cuisset, and G. Mouret, “Terahertz gas phase spectroscopy using a high-finesse Fabry–Pérot cavity,” *Optica*, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1449–1454, 2019.

[27] S. Messelot, et al., “Tamm cavity in the terahertz spectral range,” *ACS Photonics*, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 2906–2914, 2020.

[28] A. Faraon, I. Fushman, D. Englund, N. Stoltz, P. Petroff, and J. Vučković, “Coherent generation of non-classical light on a chip via photon-induced tunnelling and blockade,” *Nat. Phys.*, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 859–863, 2008.

[29] A. Ourjoumtsev, et al., “Observation of squeezed light from one atom excited with two photons,” *Nature*, vol. 474, no. 7353, pp. 623–626, 2011.

[30] S. Rebić, J. Twamley, and G. J. Milburn, “Giant kerr nonlinearities in circuit quantum electrodynamics,” *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 103, no. 15, p. 150503, 2009.

[31] B. Trauzettel, D. V. Bulaev, D. Loss, and G. Burkard, “Spin qubits in graphene quantum dots,” *Nat. Phys.*, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 192, 2007.

[32] J. Güttinger, et al., “Transport through graphene quantum dots,” *Rep. Prog. Phys.*, vol. 75, no. 12, p. 126502, 2012.

[33] E. Riccardi, et al., “Ultrasensitive photoresponse of graphene quantum dots in the coulomb blockade regime to THz radiation,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 20, no. 7, p. 5408, 2020.

[34] A. El Fatimy, R. L. Myers-Ward, A. K. Boyd, K. M. Daniels, D. K. Gaskill, and P. Barbara, “Epitaxial graphene quantum dots for high-performance terahertz bolometers,” *Nat. Nanotechnol.*, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 335, 2016.

[35] L. Banszerus, et al., “Electron-hole crossover in gate-controlled bilayer graphene quantum dots,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 20, no. 10, p. 7709, 2020.

[36] F. Valmorra, et al., “Vacuum-field-induced THz transport gap in a carbon nanotube quantum dot,” *Nat. Commun.*, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 5490, 2021.

[37] M. Asgari, et al., “Quantum-dot single-electron transistors as thermoelectric quantum detectors at terahertz frequencies,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 21, no. 20, pp. 8587–8594, 2021.

[38] L. Wang, Y. Xia, and W. Ho, “Atomic-scale quantum sensing based on the ultrafast coherence of an H2 molecule in an STM cavity,” *Science*, vol. 376, no. 6591, pp. 401–405, 2022.

[39] S. Du, K. Yoshida, Y. Zhang, I. Hamada, and K. Hirakawa, “Terahertz dynamics of electron–vibron coupling in single

molecules with tunable electrostatic potential,” *Nat. Photonics*, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 608–612, 2018.

[40] S. Du, et al., “Inelastic electron transport and ortho–para fluctuation of water molecule in H2O@C60 single molecule transistors,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 10346–10353, 2021.

[41] S. Chick, et al., “Coherent superpositions of three states for phosphorous donors in silicon prepared using THz radiation,” *Nat. Commun.*, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 16038, 2017.

[42] S. Chen, et al., “Terahertz electrometry via infrared spectroscopy of atomic vapor,” *Optica*, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 485–491, 2022.

[43] B. Liu, et al., “Electric field measurement and application based on Rydberg atoms,” *Electromagn. Sci.*, vol. 1, no. 2, 2023, Art. no. 0020151.

[44] C. M. Yee and M. S. Sherwin, “High-Q terahertz microcavities in silicon photonic crystal slabs,” *Appl. Phys. Lett.*, vol. 94, no. 15, p. 154104, 2009.

[45] Q. Zhang, et al., “Collective non-perturbative coupling of 2D electrons with high-quality-factor terahertz cavity photons,” *Nature Physics*, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1005–1011, 2016.

[46] S. Rajabali, et al., “An ultrastrongly coupled single terahertz meta-atom,” *Nat. Commun.*, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1, 2022.

[47] F. Meng, M. D. Thomson, B. Klug, and H. G. Roskos, “Strong interaction between two photons and a plasmon of a complementary metamaterial in a terahertz dual cavity,” *Opt. Express*, vol. 29, no. 26, p. 42420, 2021.

[48] S. Messelot, S. Coeymans, J. Tignon, S. Dhillon, and J. Manganey, “High Q and sub-wavelength THz electric field confinement in ultrastrongly coupled THz resonators,” *Photon. Res.*, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1203–1216, 2023.

[49] V. Dodonov, “Fifty years of the dynamical Casimir effect,” *Physics*, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 67–104, 2020.

[50] G. T. Moore, “Quantum theory of the electromagnetic field in a variable-length one-dimensional cavity,” *J. Math. Phys.*, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 2679–2691, 1970.

[51] C. M. Wilson, et al., “Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit,” *Nature*, vol. 479, no. 7373, pp. 376–379, 2011.

[52] W. G. Unruh, “Notes on black-hole evaporation,” *Phys. Rev. D*, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 870, 1976.

[53] S. Onoe, T. L. M. Guedes, A. S. Moskalenko, A. Leitenstorfer, G. Burkard, and T. C. Ralph, “Realizing a rapidly switched Unruh–DeWitt detector through electro-optic sampling of the electromagnetic vacuum,” *Phys. Rev. D*, vol. 105, no. 5, p. 056023, 2022.

[54] L. Viti, D. G. Purdie, A. Lombardo, A. C. Ferrari, and M. S. Vitiello, “HBN-encapsulated, graphene-based, room-temperature terahertz receivers, with high speed and low noise,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 3169–3177, 2020.

[55] L. Viti, et al., “Thermoelectric graphene photodetectors with sub-nanosecond response times at terahertz frequencies,” *Nanophotonics*, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2021.

[56] C. Ciuti, G. Bastard, and I. Carusotto, “Quantum vacuum properties of the intersubband cavity polariton field,” *Phys. Rev. B*, vol. 72, no. 11, p. 115303, 2005.

[57] S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, and I. Carusotto, “Quantum vacuum radiation spectra from a semiconductor microcavity with a time-modulated vacuum Rabi frequency,” *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 98, no. 10, p. 103602, 2007.
[58] M. Artoni and J. L. Birman, “Quantum-optical properties of polariton waves,” *Phys. Rev. B*, vol. 44, no. 8, p. 3736, 1991.

[59] M. Artoni and J. L. Birman, “Detection of optical squeezing and photon statistics in polaritons,” *Opt. Commun.*, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 324–334, 1992.

[60] R. Stassi, S. Savasta, L. Garziano, B. Spagnolo, and F. Nori, “Output field-quadrature measurements and squeezing in ultrastrong cavity-QED,” *New J. Phys.*, vol. 18, no. 12, p. 123005, 2016.

[61] A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, “Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter,” *Nat. Rev. Phys.*, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–40, 2019.

[62] Y. Todorov, et al., “Ultrastrong light-matter coupling regime with polariton dots,” *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 105, no. 19, p. 196402, 2010.

[63] G. Scalari, et al., “Ultrastrong coupling of the cyclotron transition of a 2D electron gas to a THz metamaterial,” *Science*, vol. 335, no. 6074, pp. 1323–1326, 2012.

[64] G. Günter, et al., “Sub-cycle switch-on of ultrastrong light-matter interaction,” *Nature*, vol. 458, no. 7235, pp. 178–181, 2009.

[65] J. Mornhinweg, M. Halbhuber, C. Ciuti, D. Bougeard, R. Huber, and C. Lange, “Tailored subcycle nonlinearities of ultrastrong light-matter coupling,” *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 126, no. 17, p. 177404, 2021.

[66] Y. Todorov and C. Sirtori, “Few-electron ultrastrong light-matter coupling in a quantum LC circuit,” *Phys. Rev. X*, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 041031, 2014.

[67] J. Keller, et al., “Few-electron ultrastrong light-matter coupling at 300 GHz with nanogap hybrid LC microcavities,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 7410–7415, 2017.

[68] P. M. Echternach, B. J. Pepper, T. Reck, and C. M. Bradford, “Single photon detection of 1.5 THz radiation with the quantum capacitance detector,” *Nat. Astron.*, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 90–97, 2018.

[69] P. Seifert, et al., “Magic-angle bilayer graphene nanocalorimeters: toward broadband, energy-resolving single photon detection,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 3459–3464, 2020.

[70] S. Komiyama, O. Astafiev, V. Antonov, and H. Hirai, “A single-photon detector in the far-infrared range,” *Nature*, vol. 403, no. 6768, pp. 405–407, 2000.

[71] S. Komiyama, “Single-photon detectors in the terahertz range,” *IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron.*, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 54–66, 2011.

[72] O. Astafiev, S. Komiyama, T. Kutsuwa, V. Antonov, Y. Kawaguchi, and K. Hirakawa, “Single-photon detector in the microwave range,” *Appl. Phys. Lett.*, vol. 80, no. 22, pp. 4250–4252, 2002.

[73] D. Zenelaj, P. P. Potts, and P. Samuelsson, “Full counting statistics of the photocurrent through a double quantum dot embedded in a driven microwave resonator,” *Phys. Rev. B*, vol. 106, no. 20, p. 205135, 2022.

[74] A. Ghirri, S. Cornia, and M. Affronte, “Microwave photon detectors based on semiconducting double quantum dots,” *Sensors*, vol. 20, no. 14, p. 4010, 2020.

[75] C. H. Wong and M. G. Vavilov, “Quantum efficiency of a single microwave photon detector based on a semiconductor double quantum dot,” *Phys. Rev. A*, vol. 95, no. 1, p. 012325, 2017.

[76] R. Loudon, *The Quantum Theory of Light*, 2nd ed. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1983, p. 274.

[77] M. C. Helm, *The Basic Physics of Intersubband Transitions, Intersubband Transitions in Quantum Wells: Physics and Device Applications*, San Diego, Academic Press, 2000.

[78] T. Ueda, S. Komiyama, Z. An, N. Nagai, and K. Hirakawa, “Temperature dependence of the performance of charge-sensitive infrared phototransistors,” *J. Appl. Phys.*, vol. 105, no. 6, p. 064517, 2009.

[79] T. Ueda, Z. An, K. Hirakawa, and S. Komiyama, “Charge-sensitive infrared phototransistors: characterization by an all-cryogenic spectrometer,” *J. Appl. Phys.*, vol. 103, no. 9, p. 093109, 2008.

[80] B. Mohsen, et al., “Auto-calibrated charge-sensitive infrared phototransistor at 9.3 µm,” *Sensors*, vol. 23, no. 7, p. 3635, 2023.

[81] D. Palaferri, et al., “Room-temperature nine-µm-wavelength photodetectors and GHz-frequency heterodyne receivers,” *Nature*, vol. 556, no. 7699, pp. 85–88, 2018.

[82] M. Jeannin, et al., “Absorption engineering in an ultrasubwavelength quantum system,” *Nano Lett.*, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 4430–4436, 2020.

[83] M. Jeannin, et al., “High temperature metamaterial terahertz quantum detector,” *Appl. Phys. Lett.*, vol. 117, no. 25, p. 251102, 2020.

[84] E. Strupiechonski, et al., “Sub-diffraction-limit semiconductor resonators operating on the fundamental magnetic resonance,” *Appl. Phys. Lett.*, vol. 100, no. 13, p. 131113, 2012.

[85] L. Sapienza, et al., “Photovoltaic probe of cavity polaritons in a quantum cascade structure,” *Appl. Phys. Lett.*, vol. 90, no. 20, p. 201101, 2007.

[86] P.-B. Vigneron, et al., “Quantum well infrared photo-detectors operating in the strong light-matter coupling regime,” *Appl. Phys. Lett.*, vol. 114, no. 13, p. 131104, 2019.

[87] F. Pisani, et al., “Electronic transport driven by collective light-matter coupled states in a quantum device,” *Nat. Commun.*, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 3914, 2023.

[88] B. Limbacher, et al., “Resonant tunneling diodes strongly coupled to the cavity field,” *Appl. Phys. Lett.*, vol. 116, no. 22, p. 221101, 2020.

[89] F. Appugliese, et al., “Breakdown of topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect,” *Science*, vol. 375, no. 6584, pp. 1030–1034, 2022.

[90] I.-C. Benea-Chelmus, C. Bonzon, C. Maissen, G. Scalari, M. Beck, and J. Faist, “Subcycle measurement of intensity correlations in the terahertz frequency range,” *Phys. Rev. A*, vol. 93, no. 4, p. 043812, 2016.

[91] C. Riek, et al., “Direct sampling of electric-field vacuum fluctuations,” *Science*, vol. 350, no. 6259, pp. 420–423, 2015.

[92] I. C. Benea-Chelmus, F. F. Settembrini, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, “Electric field correlation measurements on the electromagnetic vacuum state,” *Nature*, vol. 568, no. 7751, pp. 202–206, 2019.

[93] J. Hawecker, et al., “Cavity-based photoconductive sources for real-time terahertz imaging,” *Photon. Res.*, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 858–863, 2020.

[94] N. Wang, S. Cakmakyapan, Y.-J. Lin, H. Javadi, and M. Jarrahiet, “Room-temperature heterodyne terahertz detection with quantum-level sensitivity,” *Nat. Astron.*, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 977–982, 2019.

[95] F. Wang, et al., “Ultrafast response of harmonic modelocked THz lasers,” *Light Sci. Appl.*, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 51, 2020.

[96] M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” *Nat. Photonics*, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 97–105, 2007.
[58] M. Artoni and J. L. Birman, “Quantum-optical properties of polariton waves,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 44, no. 8, p. 3736, 1991.

[59] M. Artoni and J. L. Birman, “Detection of optical squeezing and photon statistics in polaritons,” Opt. Commun., vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 324–334, 1992.

[60] R. Stassi, S. Savasta, L. Garziano, B. Spagnolo, and F. Nori, “Output field-quadrature measurements and squeezing in ultrastrong cavity-QED,” New J. Phys., vol. 18, no. 12, p. 123005, 2016.

[61] A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, “Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter,” Nat. Rev. Phys., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–40, 2019.

[62] Y. Todorov, et al., “Ultrastrong light-matter coupling regime with polariton dots,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 105, no. 19, p. 196402, 2010.

[63] G. Scalari, et al., “Ultrastrong coupling of the cyclotron transition of a 2D electron gas to a THz metamaterial,” Science, vol. 335, no. 6074, pp. 1323–1326, 2012.

[64] G. Günter, et al., “Sub-cycle switch-on of ultrastrong light-matter interaction,” Nature, vol. 458, no. 7235, pp. 178–181, 2009.

[65] J. Mornhinweg, M. Halbhuber, C. Ciuti, D. Bougeard, R. Huber, and C. Lange, “Tailored subcycle nonlinearities of ultrastrong light-matter coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, no. 17, p. 177404, 2021.

[66] Y. Todorov and C. Sirtori, “Few-electron ultrastrong light-matter coupling in a quantum LC circuit,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 041031, 2014.

[67] J. Keller, et al., “Few-electron ultrastrong light-matter coupling at 300 GHz with nanogap hybrid LC microcavities,” Nano Lett., vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 7410–7415, 2017.

[68] P. M. Echternach, B. J. Pepper, T. Reck, and C. M. Bradford, “Single photon detection of 1.5 THz radiation with the quantum capacitance detector,” Nat. Astron., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 90–97, 2018.

[69] P. Seifert, et al., “Magic-angle bilayer graphene nanocalorimeters: toward broadband, energy-resolving single photon detection,” Nano Lett., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 3459–3464, 2020.

[70] S. Komiyama, O. Astafiev, V. Antonov, and H. Hirai, “A single-photon detector in the far-infrared range,” Nature, vol. 403, no. 6768, pp. 405–407, 2000.

[71] S. Komiyama, “Single-photon detectors in the terahertz range,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 54–66, 2011.

[72] O. Astafiev, S. Komiyama, T. Kutsuwa, V. Antonov, Y. Kawaguchi, and K. Hirakawa, “Single-photon detector in the microwave range,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 80, no. 22, pp. 4250–4252, 2002.

[73] D. Zenelaj, P. P. Potts, and P. Samuelsson, “Full counting statistics of the photocurrent through a double quantum dot embedded in a driven microwave resonator,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 106, no. 20, p. 205135, 2022.

[74] A. Ghirri, S. Cornia, and M. Affronte, “Microwave photon detectors based on semiconducting double quantum dots,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 14, p. 4010, 2020.

[75] C. H. Wong and M. G. Vavilov, “Quantum efficiency of a single microwave photon detector based on a semiconductor double quantum dot,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 95, no. 1, p. 012325, 2017.

[76] R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light, 2nd ed. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1983, p. 274.

[77] M. C. Helm, The Basic Physics of Intersubband Transitions, Intersubband Transitions in Quantum Wells: Physics and Device Applications, San Diego, Academic Press, 2000.

[78] T. Ueda, S. Komiyama, Z. An, N. Nagai, and K. Hirakawa, “Temperature dependence of the performance of charge-sensitive infrared phototransistors,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 105, no. 6, p. 064517, 2009.

[79] T. Ueda, Z. An, K. Hirakawa, and S. Komiyama, “Charge-sensitive infrared phototransistors: characterization by an all-cryogenic spectrometer,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 103, no. 9, p. 093109, 2008.

[80] B. Mohsen, et al., “Auto-calibrated charge-sensitive infrared phototransistor at 9.3 µm,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 7, p. 3635, 2023.

[81] D. Palaferri, et al., “Room-temperature nine-µm-wavelength photodetectors and GHz-frequency heterodyne receivers,” Nature, vol. 556, no. 7699, pp. 85–88, 2018.

[82] M. Jeannin, et al., “Absorption engineering in an ultrasubwavelength quantum system,” Nano Lett., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 4430–4436, 2020.

[83] M. Jeannin, et al., “High temperature metamaterial terahertz quantum detector,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 117, no. 25, p. 251102, 2020.

[84] E. Strupiechonski, et al., “Sub-diffraction-limit semiconductor resonators operating on the fundamental magnetic resonance,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 100, no. 13, p. 131113, 2012.

[85] L. Sapienza, et al., “Photovoltaic probe of cavity polaritons in a quantum cascade structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 90, no. 20, p. 201101, 2007.

[86] P.-B. Vigneron, et al., “Quantum well infrared photo-detectors operating in the strong light-matter coupling regime,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 114, no. 13, p. 131104, 2019.

[87] F. Pisani, et al., “Electronic transport driven by collective light-matter coupled states in a quantum device,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 3914, 2023.

[88] B. Limbacher, et al., “Resonant tunneling diodes strongly coupled to the cavity field,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 116, no. 22, p. 221101, 2020.

[89] F. Appugliese, et al., “Breakdown of topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect,” Science, vol. 375, no. 6584, pp. 1030–1034, 2022.

[90] I.-C. Benea-Chelmus, C. Bonzon, C. Maissen, G. Scalari, M. Beck, and J. Faist, “Subcycle measurement of intensity correlations in the terahertz frequency range,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 93, no. 4, p. 043812, 2016.

[91] C. Riek, et al., “Direct sampling of electric-field vacuum fluctuations,” Science, vol. 350, no. 6259, pp. 420–423, 2015.

[92] I. C. Benea-Chelmus, F. F. Settembrini, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, “Electric field correlation measurements on the electromagnetic vacuum state,” Nature, vol. 568, no. 7751, pp. 202–206, 2019.

[93] J. Hawecker, et al., “Cavity-based photoconductive sources for real-time terahertz imaging,” Photon. Res., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 858–863, 2020.

[94] N. Wang, S. Cakmakyapan, Y.-J. Lin, H. Javadi, and M. Jarrahiet, “Room-temperature heterodyne terahertz detection with quantum-level sensitivity,” Nat. Astron., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 977–982, 2019.

[95] F. Wang, et al., “Ultrafast response of harmonic modelocked THz lasers,” Light Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 51, 2020.

[96] M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 97–105, 2007.
[97] S. S. Dhillon, et al., “The 2017 terahertz science and technology roadmap,” *J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*, vol. 50, no. 4, p. 043001, 2017.

[98] G. Romero, D. Ballester, Y. M. Wang, V. Scarani, and E. Solano, “Ultrafast quantum gates in circuit QED,” *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 108, no. 12, p. 120501, 2012.

[99] M. Halbhuber, et al., “Non-adiabatic stripping of a cavity field from electrons in the deep-strong coupling regime,” *Nat. Photonics*, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 675–679, 2020.

[100] L. Viti and M. S. Vitiello, “Tailored nano-electronics and photonics with two-dimensional materials at terahertz frequencies,” *J. Appl. Phys.*, vol. 130, no. 17, p. 170903, 2021.
[97] S. S. Dhillon, et al., “The 2017 terahertz science and technology roadmap,” *J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*, vol. 50, no. 4, p. 043001, 2017.

[98] G. Romero, D. Ballester, Y. M. Wang, V. Scarani, and E. Solano, “Ultrafast quantum gates in circuit QED,” *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, vol. 108, no. 12, p. 120501, 2012.

[99] M. Halbhuber, et al., “Non-adiabatic stripping of a cavity field from electrons in the deep-strong coupling regime,” *Nat. Photonics*, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 675–679, 2020.

[100] L. Viti and M. S. Vitiello, “Tailored nano-electronics and photonics with two-dimensional materials at terahertz frequencies,” *J. Appl. Phys.*, vol. 130, no. 17, p. 170903, 2021.