# Bacterial Approaches for Assembling Iron-Sulfur Proteins

Karla Esquilin-Lebron, Sarah Dubrac, Frédéric Barras, Jeffrey Boyd

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Karla Esquilin-Lebron, Sarah Dubrac, Frédéric Barras, Jeffrey Boyd. Bacterial Approaches for Assembling Iron-Sulfur Proteins. mBio, 2021, 12 (6), pp.e0242521. 10.1128/mBio.02425-21. pasteur-03584451

HAL Id: pasteur-03584451

https://pasteur.hal.science/pasteur-03584451

Submitted on 22 Feb 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

# Bacterial Approaches for Assembling Iron-Sulfur Proteins

Karla Esquilin-Lebron,ª Sarah Dubrac,ᵇ Frédéric Barras,ᵇ Jeffrey M. Boydª

**ABSTRACT** Building iron-sulfur (Fe-S) clusters and assembling Fe-S proteins are essential actions for life on Earth. The three processes that sustain life, photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation, and respiration, require Fe-S proteins. Genes coding for Fe-S proteins can be found in nearly every sequenced genome. Fe-S proteins have a wide variety of functions, and therefore, defective assembly of Fe-S proteins results in cell death or global metabolic defects. Compared to alternative essential cellular processes, there is less known about Fe-S cluster synthesis and Fe-S protein maturation. Moreover, new factors involved in Fe-S protein assembly continue to be discovered. These facts highlight the growing need to develop a deeper biological understanding of Fe-S cluster synthesis, holo-protein maturation, and Fe-S cluster repair. Here, we outline bacterial strategies used to assemble Fe-S proteins and the genetic regulation of these processes. We focus on recent and relevant findings and discuss future directions, including the proposal of using Fe-S protein assembly as an anti-pathogen target.

**KEYWORDS** bacteria, iron-sulfur cluster, iron, sulfide, SUF, ISC, NIF, genetic regulation, iron regulation, iron utilization, metalloproteins, metalloregulation, sulfur

Iron (Fe) is an essential nutrient for nearly all organisms. The importance of Fe for the survival of microbes is highlighted by the fact that many organisms encode multiple Fe acquisition systems. These acquisition systems aid in competition and allow cells to acquire Fe under a variety of conditions to meet demand.

A large proportion of internalized Fe is housed within inorganic prosthetic groups called iron-sulfur (Fe-S) clusters, which are utilized by organisms in the three primary branches of life. Protein Fe-S clusters are typically ligated using cysteine thiolates and are commonly found as rhombic [2Fe-2S] or cubic [4Fe-4S] clusters; however, more complex Fe-S cofactors are utilized for specialized processes such as nitrogen fixation and hydrogen metabolism. When *Escherichia coli* is cultured in a defined medium with glucose or acetate as a carbon source, approximately 30% of the intracellular Fe is located in Fe-S clusters and low-spin ferrous heme centers (1).

As a result of their structural and electronic plasticity, Fe-S clusters are utilized for a variety of cellular functions. The genome of *E. coli* is predicted to encode ~140 Fe-S proteins (out of the ~4,300 total protein-coding open reading frames [ORFs] [2]) that have wide-ranging functions, including carbon transformations, environmental sensing, DNA repair, and respiration (3). Likewise, the metabolisms of most organisms are highly reliant on the functionalities of the Fe-S proteins. Failure to properly mature Fe-S proteins results in widespread metabolic disorders and in some cases can lead to cell death (4–6). *Bacillus subtilis* strains (lacking Suf) and *E. coli* strains (lacking Suf and Isc) cannot build Fe-S clusters and are nonviable because they cannot properly mature the essential Fe-S proteins IspG and IspH, which are required for isoprenoid synthesis (7, 8). Bypassing the need for IspG and IspH, by engineering the organisms to utilize the eukaryotic Fe-S protein-independent mevalonate pathway for isoprenoid synthesis, circumvents the necessity for Fe-S biosynthesis for survival (9).

**Citation** Esquilin-Lebron K, Dubrac S, Barras F, Boyd JM. 2021. Bacterial approaches for assembling iron-sulfur proteins. mBio 12: e02425-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02425-21.

**Editor** Jacob Yount, Ohio State University

**Copyright** © 2021 Esquilin-Lebron et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Address correspondence to Jeffrey M. Boyd, jeffboyd@SEBS.Rutgers.edu, or Frédéric Barras, fbarras@pasteur.fr.

**Published** 16 November 2021

<footnote>ªDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA</footnote>

<footnote>ᵇInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, CNRS UMR 2001, Department of Microbiology, SAMe Unit, Paris, France</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 1** General mechanism of bacterial Fe-S protein assembly. Monoatomic Fe²⁺ and S⁰ are combined with electrons on a proteinaceous molecular scaffold forming an Fe-S cluster. The Fe-S cluster is transferred to one or more carrier proteins before being transferred to an apo-protein forming a holo-protein. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) can either damage the Fe-S cluster, which can subsequently be repaired, or destroy it, resulting in apo-protein formation.</figcaption></figure>

## BUILDING IRON-SULFUR CLUSTERS

Because of the toxic nature of free Fe²⁺ and sulfide (S²⁻), tightly controlled mechanisms have evolved to synthesize Fe-S clusters from their monoatomic precursors, thereby minimizing the cytosolic concentrations of these elements not ligated to macromolecules (10). Three multiprotein assembly systems (nitrogen fixation [NIF], sulfur mobilization [SUF], and iron-sulfur cluster [ISC]) have been described in bacteria and archaea for the synthesis of Fe-S clusters for the assembly of [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-4S] proteins (11–13). These systems function similarly, but they are biochemically discrete. Additional systems have been described for building more complex Fe-S clusters such as those found in dinitrogenase reductases and hydrogenases (reviewed in references 14 and 15).

The NIF system was the first described Fe-S synthesis system. NIF was discovered because it is essential for nitrogen fixation (13). NIF functions to provide basic Fe-S clusters for nitrogenase maturation, and it is often found in diazotrophs (16). SUF and ISC are responsible for building the Fe-S clusters for the maturation of the majority of nonnitrogenase Fe-S proteins. Bioinformatic analyses have identified the SUF system as the most prevalent machinery in prokaryotic genomes (17). Bacterial genomes can encode one (Staphylococcus aureus), two (Escherichia coli), or all three (Erwinia chrysanthemi and some nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria) of the synthesis systems (17, 18) (see the section on regulation, below).

The SUF, NIF, and ISC macromolecular machines all use a common strategy to synthesize Fe-S clusters (Fig. 1). Iron, sulfur, and electrons are combined upon a cytosolic molecular scaffolding protein(s) to form an Fe-S cluster. SufBCD, IscU, and NifU are the scaffold proteins for the SUF, ISC, and NIF systems, respectively (Fig. 2) (16, 19, 20). Although the Suf proteins can be isolated with various ratios, it is thought that the active form of the SUF system has the ratio of one SufB, two SufC, and one SufD (SufBC₂D) (Fig. 2B) (21, 22). The SufBD heterodimer interface may be the site of Fe-S cluster synthesis (22).

**Sulfur.** Sulfur is typically mobilized from a free cysteine (Cys) by pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)-dependent cysteine desulfurases (SufS, IscS, and NifS) (13). Cysteine desulfurases form a covalent persulfide intermediate and alanine as a by-product (23). The persulfide can subsequently be transferred to the synthesis machinery scaffold directly or through a surrogate carrier molecule (i.e., SufU or SufE) (19, 24). Thus far, the only described persulfide sulfur carrier molecules are associated with SUF systems. Biochemical analyses suggest that these persulfide carrier proteins allow controlled delivery that protects the system from poisoning by oxidants, such as hydrogen peroxide, which would be deleterious to sulfur transfer (25, 26). SufU and SufE act as persulfide carriers for SufBC₂D in *Bacillus*
<caption>A</caption>

IscU

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>B</figcaption></figure>

SufBC₂D

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>C</figcaption></figure>

ISC system

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

SUF system

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 2** Iron-sulfur cluster synthesis. (A) Structure of IscU from *Thermus thermophilus* (PDB accession number 2QQ4). The gray ball is a Zn(II) ion, and the side chains of the three ligating cysteines are highlighted. (B) Structure of SufBC₂D from *Escherichia coli* (PDB accession number 5AWF). SufC is shown in green, and SufB and SufD are shown in purple and tan, respectively. (C) Working models for ISC- and SUF-directed iron-sulfur protein maturation in *Escherichia coli*.</figcaption></figure>

subtilis and *E. coli*, respectively. SufU was initially thought to be a scaffold protein because of its ability to bind Fe-S clusters and its homology to IscU and NifU; however, biochemical analyses of the SufS-SufU complex demonstrated a unique sulfur transfer mechanism dependent on a zinc ligand from SufU (24, 27). Although the SufU and SufE primary amino acid sequences differ, they can individually act as protective persulfide carriers for SufBC₂D; however, a *suf* operon usually codes for only one, suggesting that this functionality may have evolved twice. Some archaea such as *Methanococcus maripaludis* lack homologs of cysteine desulfurases. When this archaeon was cultured with $ ^{35}S^{2-} $, there was an enrichment of $ ^{35}S^{2-} $ in Fe-S cluster-containing proteins but not in free Cys, suggesting that sulfide, and not Cys, is the source of the sulfur for Fe-S synthesis (28).

**Electrons.** The *isc* operon typically encodes a [2Fe-2S] ferredoxin (Fdx), which can provide electrons for ISC-directed Fe-S synthesis. Fdx interacts with IscS, and reduced Fdx provides an electron to the IscS complex for sulfane (S⁰) reduction (29, 30). A second reduction event is required to produce S²⁻, which is the substrate for Fe-S cluster synthesis on IscU. NADH and NADP⁺-ferredoxin reductase can provide electrons for Fdx reduction *in vitro* (31). The electron donors to the scaffold proteins NifU and SufBC₂D are unknown. SufBC₂D copurifies with reduced flavin adenine dinucleotide (FADH₂), consistent with the complex conducting redox chemistry (21). NifU, from the NIF system, contains a stable redox-active [2Fe-2S] cluster that may provide electrons for NIF-directed synthesis (32). The membrane-associated Rnf complex has a role in
dinitrogen fixation in *Azotobacter vinelandii*, by donating electrons from NADH to ferredoxin using reverse electron flow and $\Delta\mu Na^+$ or $\Delta\mu H^+$ (33). *Azotobacter vinelandii rnf* mutants have a decreased capacity for dinitrogen reduction because of poor Fe-S cluster occupancy of the dinitrogenase reductase NifH (34). The *rnf* mutants also have decreased activity of the Fe-S enzyme aconitase. It is tempting to speculate that Rnf has a role in providing electrons for Fe-S cluster synthesis or repair.

**Iron.** The source of Fe for cluster building remains unknown. Several candidates such as CyaY and IscX have been proposed based on *in vitro* considerations, but subsequent *in vivo* investigations failed to provide supporting evidence. CyaY is the counterpart of mitochondrial frataxin. The reason why frataxin/CyaY was predicted to act as an iron donor came from (i) observing iron homeostasis disturbance in mitochondria from frataxin-deficient tissues or organisms and (ii) iron binding to CyaY *in vitro* although with weak affinity. Frataxin, in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, forms a tripartite complex with the cysteine desulfurase NFS1/IscS and the scaffold ISU/IscU. *In vitro*, frataxin appears to have the opposite effect on Fe-S formation whether one studies the prokaryote (i.e., inhibition) or the eukaryote (i.e., stimulation) system (35). Possible explanations lie in differences in IscS (prokaryote) and NFS1 (eukaryote) cysteine desulfurase intrinsic biochemical features. In any case, studies *in vivo* in *E. coli* confirmed that CyaY is a positive effector of ISC-mediated Fe-S cluster biogenesis (36, 37).

The *E. coli* *isc operon* codes for IscX, which also binds $Fe^{2+}$ with low affinity and has a role in ISC-directed Fe-S synthesis (36, 38). IscX binds to IscS at a location that overlaps the CyaY binding site (39). The presence of $Fe^{2+}$ increases the affinity between IscX and IscU and stabilizes the complex (38). IscX associates with IscS-IscU, forming a tripartite complex resulting in inhibition of cysteine desulfurase activity. Analyses using both CyaY and IscX, in conjunction with the IscU-IscS complex, found that CyaY inhibits Fe-S cluster formation on IscU, which is mitigated by the addition of IscX at low Fe concentrations ($<20 \mu M$); however, the effect of IscX is negligible at higher concentrations (40).

While evidence suggests that IscA is an Fe-S cluster carrier (discussed below), one group of researchers found that *E. coli* IscA copurified with Fe but not sulfide (41, 151). Apo-IscA could be loaded with $Fe^{2+}$ *in vitro* ($K_a = 3.0 \times 10^{-19} M^{-1}$), and it bound one Fe per IscA. The Fe-loaded IscA could provide Fe for IscS-directed Fe-S cluster synthesis on IscU. An IscA$_{Y40F}$ variant was defective in $Fe^{2+}$ binding but appeared to bind an Fe-S cluster. $K_a$ values for Fe association, Fe-S cluster stability, Fe-S cluster transfer kinetics, and labile Fe and sulfide concentrations were not reported for the reconstituted IscA$_{Y40F}$ variant (42). A wild-type *iscA* allele, but not an IscA$_{Y40F}$ allele, could complement an *iscA* mutant. Whether IscA is a bona fide Fe donor *in vivo* remains to be established.

**Energy.** The assembly of Fe-S proteins can require an input of energy. SufC, of the SUF system, has both Walker A and Walker B nucleotide binding motifs and functions as an ATPase (43, 44). ATPase activity is stimulated by interaction with either SufD or SufB (45). The presence of SufC is necessary for SufB to interact with the sulfur transfer protein SufE (19). A conserved lysine (Lys40) in the Walker A motif is required for ATPase activity (46). The SufC$_{K40R}$ variant interacts with SufB and SufD *in vitro*, but the *sufC$_{K40R}$* allele cannot replace *sufC*, suggesting that ATPase activity is necessary for SUF function (22). Consistent with these findings, the SufB$_{2(K40R)}$D variant does not assemble an Fe-S cluster *in vivo*, whereas SufB$_2$D does (47).

In the ISC system, the scaffold IscU interacts with an Hsp70-like chaperone (HscA) and a J-protein cochaperone (HscB) (48). Hsp70 chaperones have an ATP binding domain and a protein substrate binding domain. Biochemical and biophysical studies found that interactions between IscU and HscAB aid in building the Fe-S cluster on IscU and/or the transfer of the Fe-S cluster from holo-IscU to a target apo-protein (49). The proposed role of the cochaperone HscB is to escort IscU to HscA-ATP and promote ATP hydrolysis (50). After ATP hydrolysis, HscB is released because it has a low affinity for HscA-ADP, and IscU is prompted to deliver the Fe-S cluster to an apo-protein or Fe-S cluster carrier protein (49). ADP release by HscA induces conformational changes that promote IscU release, prompting a new cycle of chaperone-mediated Fe-S cluster synthesis and transfer (48, 51). The roles of HscAB were recently reviewed (52).
## DELIVERY OF IRON-SULFUR CLUSTERS TO TARGET APO-PROTEINS

After Fe-S cluster construction on a scaffolding protein, it is passed to a client apo-protein, forming the holo-protein. *In vitro* evidence for direct Fe-S cluster transfer from a scaffold to an apo-protein was demonstrated, but *in vivo* observations stress the essential role of carriers and cast doubt on the physiological relevance of the direct scaffold-apo-protein connection (41, 53–55).

Fe-S cluster carriers have been shown to bind [4Fe-4S] clusters, [2Fe-2S] clusters, or both (56). It is thought that the carriers typically deliver the Fe-S cluster that they are provided; however, the Fe-S carrier IscA (A-type carrier [ATC]) from *Azotobacter vinelandii* can bind both [4Fe-4S]²⁺ and [2Fe-2S]²⁺ clusters and can convert the [2Fe-2S]²⁺ form to the [4Fe-4S]²⁺ form using two-electron reductive coupling (56). It was proposed that the [4Fe-4S]²⁺ form could cycle back to the [2Fe-2S]²⁺ form by dioxygen-catalyzed cleavage, but this has not been experimentally demonstrated. Whether these cluster dynamics have a physiological role is unknown.

The number of carriers varies within different bacterial species. For instance, *E. coli* synthesizes at least six carriers (the A-type carriers [IscA, SufA, and ErpA], NfuA, GrxD, and Mrp), while *Bacillus subtilis* and *Staphylococcus aureus* have only two characterized carriers (SufA and Nfu). Strains lacking one or more Fe-S cluster carriers can often maintain the assembly of Fe-S proteins, suggesting that, in general, the carriers have a degree of functional overlap (53, 57). Note, however, that *erpA* is essential for aerobic growth in *E. coli* (9).

The number of targets exceeds the number of carriers, raising questions about the dynamics and specificity of the delivery network. While *in vitro* transfer assays have provided evidence that carriers can transfer clusters to apo-proteins, they did not reveal substantial insights into substrate specificity (41). In *E. coli*, the six carriers are not synthesized to the same levels, and expression varies based upon growth state and condition, suggesting that genetic control is key for orchestrating functional redundancy (58). We briefly discuss some of these intermediate actors below.

**A-type carriers.** A-type carriers (ATCs) are predicted to bind Fe-S clusters using three cysteine ligands. An X-ray structure of *Thermosynechococcus elongatus* IscA ligating a [2Fe-2S] cluster is illustrated in Fig. 3A (59). The three cysteinyl ligands (C37, C101, and C103) to the Fe-S cluster are highlighted. Phylogenetic analysis allowed researchers to divide the ATCs into two groups: ATC-I and ATC-II (53). Further functional studies showed that ATC-I proteins directly interact with the apo-proteins, while the ATC-II proteins associate with the scaffold (53). In *E. coli*, ErpA belongs to the ATC-I family, and IscA and SufA are of the ATC-II family. ErpA interacts physically with apo-proteins, whereas SufA and IscA, to an appreciable degree, do not. This suggests that the ATC-II carriers pass their Fe-S clusters to ATC-I for delivery to their final destinations (60). However, this simple view, derived mostly from normal growth conditions, might change under stress conditions. Indeed, SufA is predicted to interact directly with targets under such conditions, while ErpA could also interact with another type of carrier, NfuA, to form a stress-resistant heteromer (60). Fe-S clusters on holo-ErpA, holo-IscA, and holo-SufA are equally stable in the presence of dioxygen; however, the addition of the Fe-S cluster carrier NfuA to holo-ErpA nearly doubled the half-life of the ErpA Fe-S cluster (60). These data suggest that NfuA and ErpA may work in conjunction to form an oxidant-resistant Fe-S cluster delivery system. Altogether, the associations between NfuA and ErpA, as well as ErpA and apo-target proteins, support the hypothesis that under balanced aerobic conditions, ErpA conducts the last step of Fe-S cluster delivery in *E. coli*. As a matter of fact, with the exception of SoxR, the *in vivo* maturation of all target proteins studied depended upon ErpA (see below) (61).

**Nfu-type carriers.** The C-terminal domain of the *A. vinelandii* NifU Fe-S cluster scaffold is referred to as Nfu (Fig. 3B). The Nfu domain was demonstrated to bind and transfer a [4Fe-4S]²⁺ cluster to an apo-protein (62). An alternate protein, named NfuA, contains a C-terminal domain with homology to the Nfu domain of NifU and an N-terminal domain with homology to an A-type carrier (Fig. 3C). The NfuA A-type domain is
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 3** Iron-sulfur cluster carriage. (A) Structure of the A-type carrier IscA from *Thermosynechococcus elongatus* (PDB accession number 1X0G) with a [2Fe-2S] cluster bound. (B) Structure of Nfu from *Staphylococcus epidermidis* (PDB accession number 1XHJ). The cysteine thiols that are proposed iron-sulfur cluster ligands are highlighted. (C) Schematic representation of iron-sulfur cluster scaffolds and carriers.</figcaption></figure>

referred to as “degenerated” because it lacks a cysteine required for Fe-S cluster ligation (63, 64). The C-terminal Nfu domain, but not the degenerated A-type domain, binds a [4Fe-4S]²⁺ cluster and can transfer this cluster to apo-proteins. The Fe-S cluster bound by holo-NfuA is more stable in the presence of dioxygen than that of holo-A-type carriers, suggesting a role for NfuA under oxidative stress conditions (60). Consistent with this hypothesis, strains lacking *nfuA* are defective in maturating Fe-S proteins facing oxidative stress (63, 64). Both the Nfu and A-type domains are necessary for NfuA function *in vivo* (63, 64). The A-type domain was demonstrated to function in targeting NfuA to apo-proteins (65, 66).

Three additional bacterial proteins consisting solely of an Nfu domain have been described. Nfu was necessary for the proper maturation of the Fe-S protein photosystem complex I (PS1) in *Synechococcus* and the maturation of several Fe-S proteins in *Staphylococcus aureus* and *Helicobacter pylori* (57, 67, 68). Holo-Nfu is a dimer with a bridging [2Fe-2S]²⁺ or [4Fe-4S]²⁺ cluster. Holo-Nfu could activate apo-PS1 and apaconitase. An *S. aureus* *nfu* mutant had decreased virulence in murine models of infection and decreased survival in neutrophils. An *H. pylori* *nfu* mutant was defective in colonicizing murine stomachs.

**Mrp-type carriers.** Genetic studies identified *apbC*, encoding a member of the Mrp class, as being necessary to maturate the Fe-S enzymes ThiH and/or ThiC in *Salmonella enterica* (69). Biochemical studies demonstrated that ApbC can bind and effectively transfer Fe-S clusters to apo-proteins (70). ApbC is a dimer, and each monomer contains 2 cysteines separated by 2 amino acids (C-X-X-C motif). These cysteines are thought to provide four ligands, two from each monomer, for the ligation of a [4Fe-4S] cluster that bridges the dimer interface. Mrp proteins contain Walker A and B ATP hydrolysis motifs. An ApbC<sub>K116A</sub> variant was defective in ATP hydrolysis and inactive *in vivo*. The addition of ATP did not accelerate ApbC-directed cluster transfer *in vitro*, and the ApbC<sub>K116A</sub> variant proficiently transferred Fe-S clusters. These data led to the
hypothesis that ATP hydrolysis is required for loading ApbC with an Fe-S cluster (71). ApbC was required for growth on the carbon source tricarballylate presumably because it functions in assembling the Fe-S enzyme tricarballylate reductase (TcuB) (72). The absence of ApbC could be bypassed by increasing the expression of *iscU* or by decreasing tricarballylate influx and thereby preventing tricarballylate accumulation, which inhibits isocitrate dehydrogenase (73, 74).

**Monothiol glutaredoxins.** As the name suggests, monothiol glutaredoxins lack the traditional dithiol C-X-X-C motif and instead have a C-G-F-S motif. *E. coli* *grxD* encodes a monothiol glutaredoxin (75). Combining a *grxD* mutation with an *iscU* mutation resulted in synthetic lethality, suggesting that GrxD functions in conjunction with the SUF machinery to assembly Fe-S proteins (*E. coli* must have functional SUF or ISC for viability [7]). GrxD purified from *E. coli* contained a [2Fe-2S] cluster. To chemically reconstitute an Fe-S cluster on apo-GrxD, the reaction mixture required glutathione (GSH) (76). GrxD binds a [2Fe-2S] cluster that bridges a homodimer interface using one cysteine ligand from each monomer, and GSH thiolates provide two additional ligands (77). The holo-GrxD homodimer can transfer an Fe-S cluster to apo-Fdx, forming the [2Fe-2S] holo-Fdx. GrxD was recently shown to cooperate with NfuA in the maturation of the Fe-S enzyme MiaB (78).

*E. coli* BolA is an ortholog of *Saccharomyces cerevisiae* Fra2, which forms a heterodimer with a monothiol glutaredoxin to bind a [2Fe-2S] cluster (79, 80). When purified from *E. coli*, BolA copurifies with GrxD and vice versa. An Fe-S cluster could not be reconstituted on BolA; however, an Fe-S cluster could be reconstituted on the BolA-GrxD heterodimer, and the cluster could be transferred to apo-Fdx (76). *E. coli* bolA and *grxD* mutants do not phenocopy one another, suggesting that they can also function independently.

## AUXILIARY FACTORS UTILIZED IN IRON-SULFUR PROTEIN MATURATION

Several loci have been identified that function in the assembly of Fe-S proteins but are not considered part of the core Fe-S cluster biosynthetic apparatus. These factors are not typically found within operons encoding the core ISC, SUF, or NIF machineries.

**SufT.** The *sufT* gene is often associated with *suf* operons (defined by having *sufB* and *sufC*) in bacterial and archaeal genomes (81). Typically, SufT proteins, such as those encoded by *S. aureus* and *B. subtilis*, are composed entirely of domain of unknown function 59 (DUF59). Larger proteins containing a DUF59 domain have roles in Fe-S cluster assembly, including the eukaryotic cytosolic Fe-S cluster assembly (CIA) factor CIA2, which functions in the maturation of nuclear and cytosolic Fe-S proteins (82–84). *S. aureus* strains lacking SufT have decreased activities of Fe-S enzymes under conditions requiring a high demand for Fe-S clusters. The phenotypes associated with the *ΔsufT* and *Δnfu* mutations were synergistic (81, 85). Moreover, the overproduction of Nfu mitigated the phenotypes of the *ΔsufT* strain. These data suggest that SufT functions in Fe-S carriage and has some degree of functional overlap with Nfu; however, Fe-S cluster binding by SufT remains elusive. SufT was reported to be essential in *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* (86).

**Low-molecular-weight thiols.** The role of low-molecular-weight (LMW) thiols in Fe-S protein assembly is likely multifaceted and they could function in all four steps of Fe-S protein assembly: biogenesis, trafficking, assembly, and repair. In eukaryotes, GSH has been associated with the synthesis and trafficking of Fe-S clusters from the mitochondrion to the cytosol (71, 87). In bacteria, genetic and biochemical studies demonstrated a role for GSH in assembling Fe-S proteins, in addition to its roles in maintaining proper intracellular redox (88). GSH can act as an Fe buffer by binding nonincorporated cytosolic Fe (79, 89). GSH can also provide electrons to reduce Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ (90). GSH, in conjunction with monothiol glutaredoxins, delivers Fe-S clusters to the apo-protein targets (77, 80, 91). GSH can bind and deliver Fe-S clusters *in vitro*, but the *in vivo* relevance of this chemistry is unknown (92). GSH can also reduce oxidized protein cysteine residues before Fe-S cluster insertion.

Many microorganisms, including *S. aureus*, do not produce GSH but instead produce the LMW thiol bacillithiol (BSH) (93). An *S. aureus* strain defective in producing
BSH exhibits phenotypes similar to those of cells lacking Fe-S cluster carriers, including decreased activities of Fe-S-dependent enzymes (94). The phenotypes of a BSH-minus strain were suppressed by the multicopy expression of *sufA* or *nfu* but not by the over-expression of the SUF system. These data suggest that the phenotypes of a BSH-minus strain were not the result of faulty *de novo* Fe-S synthesis but rather were the result of defective assembly or repair of Fe-S proteins (95). A strain lacking BSH did not appear to suffer from decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism, but a protective role for BSH in buffering against metal ion poisoning of Fe-S enzymes or the maturation machinery has not been ruled out (96).

**Folic acid binding protein (YgfZ).** *E. coli* YgfZ (COG0354) is a homolog of yeast lba57p, which is a mitochondrial protein that participates in the assembly of mitochondrial Fe-S proteins (97). A *ΔygfZ* mutant strain has decreased activities of selected Fe-S enzymes, including MiaB, and is sensitive to ROS stress (98). YgfZ binds tetrahydrofolate (THF), and an *E. coli* strain lacking the ability to synthesize folate has MiaB activity similar to that of a *ΔygfZ* mutant, suggesting that folate, as well as YgfZ, is utilized in assembling some Fe-S proteins. The COG0354 proteins are paralogous to enzymes that utilize THF to accept formaldehyde units, leading to the hypothesis that YgfZ functions to remove one-carbon units that deleteriously affect the functions of Fe-S proteins (99).

**RIC proteins.** *E. coli* *ytfE* encodes a repair of iron clusters (RIC) protein that has increased expression during nitric oxide stress (100). The expression of *ytfE* is directly controlled by NsrR, which directly responds to nitric oxide (NO) levels (101, 102). An *E. coli* *ytfE* mutant is sensitive to NO or H₂O₂ stress, and Fe-S enzymes have decreased activities after cell extracts from the *ytfE* mutant are treated with hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) or NO. Importantly, damaged Fe-S proteins had a lower rate of repair in the *ytfE* mutant (103). YtfE and its homologs are di-Fe hemerythrin-like proteins (104, 105). The Fe atoms of holo-YtfE are labile and can be used as an Fe source for Fe-S cluster synthesis *in vitro* (106). These findings resulted in renaming these proteins "repair of iron clusters" (RIC). The mechanism by which RIC proteins may repair damaged Fe-S clusters is unknown. YtfE interacts with the Fe scavenger Dps *in vivo*, and their corresponding genes have genetic interactions. These findings led to the hypothesis that Dps may be providing Fe to YtfE to be used for the repair of damaged Fe-S clusters (107). In *S. aureus*, *ytfE* (*scdA*) and *dps* protect against H₂O₂ damage, and both are transcriptionally regulated by SrrAB, which responds to electron flux through respiratory pathways (108, 109).

Physiological, genetic, and biochemical data suggest that a *ytfE* mutant has more NO-induced damage and reduced activity of the Fe-S cluster-utilizing transcription factor (TF) NsrA. Structural data show that YtfE has a hydrophobic channel where NO could access the Fe ions, and the Fe atoms have been shown to ligate NO (105, 110). These data support the hypothesis that YtfE functions in *S-trans*-nitrosylation or the removal of NO from nitrosylated proteins (111). However, YtfE was not able to release NO from nitrosylated fumarase, a [4Fe-4S]-requiring dehydratase. YtfE contributes to *Yersinia pseudotuberculosis* and *Haemophilus influenzae* pathogenesis (112, 113).

## REGULATION OF IRON-SULFUR CLUSTER SYNTHESIS

Fe-S cluster biosynthesis is controlled by regulators that sense environmental conditions potentially adverse for Fe-S cluster assembly, such as Fe limitation or oxidative and nitrosative stress, which affect the stability and integrity of the cofactors. Integrating these stimuli with Fe-S synthesis ensures that demand is met and fitness is maintained.

**The situation in E. coli: adapting to fluctuating conditions and switching between machineries.** In *E. coli*, Fe-S cluster biosynthesis is achieved by using two types of machineries, ISC and SUF, which permit maturation of the same set of apo-proteins under a wide breadth of growth conditions. Particularly, genetic control circuits occur that endow *E. coli* with the capacity to synthesize one or the other machinery under different growth conditions and thereby have the Fe-S cluster biogenesis capacity to match the Fe-S demand, regardless of the growth conditions. Two transcriptional regulators, IscR and Fur, and a noncoding RNA, RyhB, are key actors in orchestrating this
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 4** Regulation of iron-sulfur cluster synthesis in *Escherichia coli*. (A) X-ray structure of an apo-IscR monomer with the proposed Fe-S cluster ligands (C92A, C98A, C104A, and H107) highlighted in red (PDB accession number 4HF1). Note that in this IscR variant, the ligating cysteines have been changed to alanines. (B) X-ray structure of dimeric apo-IscR bound to the *hya* promoter, which is a type 2 binding site (PDB accession number 4HF1). Each monomer is differently colored (blue and pink). (C) Model for the regulation of ISC and SUF expression in *Escherichia coli*.</figcaption></figure>

adaptative response, as all three control, directly or indirectly, the expression of the *isc* and *suf* operons.

**(i) IscR-mediated Fe-S cluster homeostasis control.** IscR is a TF that belongs to the Rrf2 family of winged helix-turn-helix TFs. It hosts a [2Fe-2S] cluster, which allows sensing aerobiosis, oxidative stress, iron limitation, and, possibly, reactive nitrogen species (RNS). Mutagenesis and structural studies have identified residues Cys92, Cys98, Cys104, and His107 as Fe-S cluster ligands (Fig. 4A) (114, 115). A His ligand is uncommon, and this might render the cluster labile and sensitive to stress signals. It is particularly useful for the IscR regulator since its activity is not influenced by the oxidative state of its cluster but is strictly dependent on the presence/absence of the cluster (115, 116). IscR is found in the apo- and holo-forms, and both types can have regulatory functions (117).

Two types of binding sites, types 1 and 2, are found within IscR-regulated promoters. Holo-IscR binds type 1 sites, and the holo- and apo-forms bind the type 2 sites (Fig. 4B) (114). The type 1 inverted repeat sequence is well conserved and is mainly found upstream of genes encoding Fe-S building proteins (the *isc*, *erpA*, and *nfuA* loci) (118). The type 2 sequence is an imperfect palindrome and highly degenerated, which causes large variations in binding affinities between operator regions (118). Interestingly, while the type 1 sequence-containing promoters are all repressed by IscR, genes preceded by a type 2 sequence can be either repressed or activated by IscR. This does not correlate with the position of the IscR binding site, as shown with the *hyaA* and *sufA* genes. Both promoters exhibit a type 2 sequence within their -35 consensus promoter sequence yet show opposite expression patterns as *hyaA* expression is repressed by holo-IscR, whereas *sufA* expression is activated by apo-IscR (118).

In *E. coli*, *iscR* is the proximal gene in the *isc* operon and is separated from the next gene (*iscS*) by an unusually long untranslated region that is targeted by RyhB, a non-coding RNA (see below). Under balanced conditions, IscR is maturated by the ISC machinery, and holo-IscR acts as a repressor of its own expression as well as the
expression of downstream *isc* genes until equilibrium shifts toward a low level of apo-*IscR*. At this point, repression is alleviated, more *IscR* is synthesized, and the ISC machinery is produced, resulting in an increased level of holo-*IscR* in the cell. A feedback loop is then set up, and holo-*IscR* represses its own expression as well as those of the following *isc* genes. Upon an increase in the cellular demand for Fe-S cluster synthesis (iron limitation and oxidative stress), there is competition between apo-protein substrates and newly synthesized apo-*IscR* for the ISC machinery. Next, apo-*IscR* accumulates, and this form activates the expression of the *suf* operon (119). In summation, *IscR* represses the transcription of *isc* and activates *suf* transcription in its Fe-S-bound and unbound forms, respectively, directly connecting both the cell's Fe-S cluster biogenesis capacity and Fe-S cluster demand (Fig. 4C).

Evidence has been provided that the efficiency of ISC proteins, in particular *IscU*, would be lowered under stress conditions, opening the possibility that the contribution of the ISC machinery declines under such conditions and that the cell would rather switch from ISC to SUF rather than accumulating both (25). Importantly, *IscR* appears to be a poor substrate for the SUF system, and therefore, *IscR* is likely to remain mostly in its apo-form if the cell thrives under stress conditions (54). The iron-responding Fur-RhyB genetic circuit also favors such a switch (see below).

**(ii) Iron-mediated control of Fe-S biogenesis by Fur and RyhB.** Iron availability is sensed by the transcriptional regulator Fur, which represses the synthesis of the non-coding RNA RyhB, among others. Because both Fur and RyhB regulate the expression of the *isc* and *suf* operons, directly or indirectly, they are likely to contribute to the switch between the ISC and SUF machineries as a mode of adaptation to iron bioavailability. Holo-Fur acts as a repressor of *suf* operon transcription. Under iron-limiting conditions, the Fe²⁺ cofactor of Fur is lost, and repression is alleviated, providing an opportunity for *IscR*-dependent *suf* operon expression (120). Meanwhile, *ryhB*, which is also repressed by holo-Fur, is expressed and targets the intergenic region between *iscR* and *iscS*, causing translation inhibition of the downstream *iscSUA* genes and probably mRNA decay, whereas a stem-loop structure forms, enabling the stabilization of the upstream *iscR* messenger moiety (Fig. 4C) (121). Under these conditions, apo-*IscR* accumulates and activates the expression of the *suf* operon. Consequently, iron limitation enhances the expression of the *suf* operon by both alleviating Fur repression and favoring apo-*IscR* activation, while the expression of *iscSUA* is shut off by RyhB-mediated translation inhibition and possibly the poor activity of the encoded *IscU* scaffold protein. It should be noted that a recent study suggests that Fur senses iron homeostasis by binding a [2Fe-2S] cluster instead of Fe²⁺ as is currently suggested (122). If this observation were to be confirmed *in vivo*, it would link the Fur-repressing activity to both iron availability and Fe-S biogenesis, in which case the interplay between *IscR* and Fur would be an important issue to decipher *in vivo*.

**(iii) Switching the Fe-S cluster synthesis machineries under redox stress.** The OxyR transcriptional regulator activates the expression of *suf* genes in response to H₂O₂ (Fig. 4C). The OxyR binding site is located far upstream from the *sufA* promoter (operon *sufABCDSE*), and OxyR-dependent activation requires the binding activity of IHF to bring the OxyR site closer to the -10 and -35 promoter elements (123). OxyR- and apo-*IscR*-mediated activations have been found to be additive (119). Thus, because oxidative stress could well favor the shift from holo-*IscR* to apo-*IscR*, it is possible that under such conditions, *E. coli* accumulates the synthesis of both ISC, following the alleviation of *IscR* repression, and SUF, following activation by OxyR. However, oxidative stress is known to lower iron bioavailability (by oxidizing Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺). This could alleviate holo-Fur-dependent repressions, leading to *ryhB* expression and, subsequently, *isc* repression, thereby preventing the accumulation of both systems. Moreover, *IscU* activity was reported to be altered by oxidative stress (25). Thus, under oxidative stress, a genetic switch, like that observed under iron-limiting conditions, might prevail. The expression of the *suf* operon is also repressed by the [4Fe-4S] cluster-containing transcription factor NsrR under normal growth conditions. Under nitrosative stress conditions, the Fe-S cluster is lost, and NsrR-dependent repression is
alleviated (124). Again, because IscR could shift from holo to apo under such redox stress conditions, a shift between the machineries could take place.

**(iv) Switching between machineries promotes antibiotic tolerance.** One phenotypic consequence of the stress-controlled switch between the ISC and SUF systems is enhanced resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics (125). The uptake of aminoglycosides is dependent upon the proton motive force (PMF), and therefore, the bactericidal activity of these antibiotics is proportional to respiration efficiency. Mechanistic causes of the aminoglycoside tolerance resulting from iron limitation are (i) the down- and upregulation of ISC and SUF, respectively, by the IscR- and Fur/RyhB-dependent controls described above; (ii) inefficient maturation of respiratory complexes I and II by the SUF system, resulting in decreased respiratory efficiency; and (iii) Fur/RyhB-dependent downregulation of complex I and II synthesis (125, 126).

Another illustration of the link between the switching machinery and antibiotic tolerance is demonstrated in the case of fluoroquinolones. Exposing *E. coli* to phenazine methosulfate (PMS), a redox-cycling compound that causes oxidative stress and NAD(P) H exhaustion, yielded enhanced tolerance to norfloxacin, a DNA gyrase inhibitor (61). Under PMS exposure, *E. coli* switches to the SUF system, which can target Fe-S clusters to the transcriptional activator SoxR. The Fe-S cluster bound to SoxR becomes oxidized and allows SoxR to activate *soxS* transcription. SoxS then activates the expression of *acrAB*, encoding an efflux pump, which exports fluoroquinolones out of the cell.

**A feed-forward loop mediated by IscR and RyhB.** Acting at both transcription and translation initiation permits finely tuned gene expression. An example is given by the dual control afforded by IscR and RyhB on the expression of *erpA* in *E. coli*. As mentioned above, *E. coli* synthesizes multiple Fe-S carriers, and whether they have a degree of functional redundancy has been a matter of debate. The transcription of *erpA* is repressed by holo-IscR, while *erpA* mRNA translation is negatively regulated by RyhB (58). These data led to the hypothesis that ErpA is synthesized under neither Fe-replete conditions (repression by IscR) nor Fe limitation conditions (inhibition by RyhB). This double control allows ErpA synthesis within a window of intermediate Fe concentrations. The added value of this double control is that ErpA is synthesized under conditions in which neither of the two other A-type carriers, SufA and IscA, is fully synthesized. This control ensures the continuing presence of at least one carrier throughout fluctuating iron concentrations (58).

**IscR as a sensor of the anaerobic/aerobic switch.** The regulation of gene transcription often involves multiple transcriptional regulators, which might compete (or synergize) for closely located operator sites and modify the importance of each other's influence. The influence of IscR on alternate regulators is well documented by the unexpected role of IscR in cell-to-cell variability during the shift from dioxygen respiration to trimethyl amine oxide (TMAO) respiration. The genes that encode TMAO reductase are under the transcriptional control of the TorT/TorS/TorR three-component regulatory system (127, 128). In the presence of dioxygen, *torT-torS* expression is repressed by IscR, and the level of TorT/S is so low that a stochastic effect prevails, leading to cell-to-cell variability in TMAO reductase synthesis. In contrast, under anoxic TMAO-respiring conditions, IscR titers decrease, and *torT-torS* expression is derepressed. The levels of TorT/S are now high enough to cancel any effect from stochasticity in gene expression. Therefore, IscR is determining in this "regulated stochasticity" by acting upstream in the cascade, controlling the level of TorT/S, and mediating the oxygen regulation of cell-to-cell variability (129).

**The role of IscR in pathogenic bacteria.** IscR is widely conserved and was studied in several bacteria, including the pathogens *Erwinia chrysanthemi* (18), *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* (130), *Burkholderia mallei* (131), *Vibrio vulnificus* (132), *Salmonella enterica* (133), and *Yersinia pseudotuberculosis* (134). Because Fe-S-based biology is central to cellular bioenergetics and metabolism, it is expected to be important for bacterial fitness and multiplication within its host. Moreover, both iron limitation and oxidative stress are conditions met by pathogens during host colonization, suggesting that IscR may be instrumental in coordinating adaption.
Less expected, however, was that IscR would directly control the synthesis of key virulence determinants as was reported in both *S. enterica* and *Yersinia pseudotuberculosis*. Both pathogens rely on type 3 secretion systems (T3SSs) utilized to inject effectors into the host cells, and IscR controls the synthesis of the T3SSs in both bacterial species. *S. enterica* synthesizes two T3SSs, referred to as *Salmonella* pathogenicity island 1 (SPI1) and SPI2. SPI1 is required for the passage of the bacterium across the epithelial border, while SPI2 is required to establish an *S. enterica*-containing vacuole in macrophages. The *spi1* locus includes *hilD*, encoding a major virulence regulator, which controls its own synthesis and that of effectors. A type 2 IscR binding site is present upstream of *hilD*, and IscR binding was proposed to interfere with HilD positive autoregulation, thereby lowering virulence (133). Consistently, an *iscU* mutant, which has a high level of apo-IscR, exhibited a reduced invasion capacity in epithelial cells and attenuated virulence in a murine model of infection. Conversely, an *iscR* mutant was hyperinvasive in HeLa cells (133). In *Y. pseudotuberculosis*, IscR binds a type 2 motif within the promoter of a gene encoding the transcription factor LcrF. The *lcrF* gene is located in the virulence plasmid pYV, which also encodes a T3SS. LcrF regulates the transcription of the T3SS-secreted effector genes and, thereby, virulence. IscR was essential for T3SS-dependent secretion, and an *iscR* mutant was deficient in colonization of Peyer's patches, spleen, and liver in murine models (134). In *V. vulnificus*, IscR directly activates the expression of the *vhbA* genes encoding a cytolysin in response to host-derived signals such as nitrosative stress and iron starvation (135). In *E. coli*, some fimbria genes are directly regulated by IscR, such as *cfaA* and *fimE* (136, 137). Finally, IscR has been shown to coordinate oxidative stress resistance during pathogenesis in *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* and *Xanthomonas campestris* (130, 138).

**Regulation of Fe-S biogenesis by SufR.** SufR, first described in *Cyanobacteria*, is another Fe-S biogenesis-dedicated transcriptional regulator (139). Interestingly, while *Cyanobacteria* have the two main Fe-S biogenesis machineries, ISC and SUF (and sometimes the NIF system dedicated to nitrogenase maturation), the IscR regulator regulates the transcription of the *isc* locus only. The expression of the *suf* locus is under the transcriptional control of its own regulator, SufR. SufR belongs to the DeoR family of helix-loop-helix regulators. Its DNA binding domain is located in the N-terminal portion of the protein, and it has a nonconventional Fe-S binding site in the C-terminal portion (C-X₁₂⁻C-X₁₃⁻C-X₁₄⁻C) where a [4Fe-4S] cluster is coordinated (140). Holo-SufR is a repressor of the *suf* locus, thereby downregulating its own expression. It binds a perfect palindromic sequence (CAAC-N₆-GTTG) that is highly conserved in the promoter regions of *suf* loci in *Cyanobacteria* (140). SufR regulatory activity is sensitive to redox stress, oxidative stress, and iron starvation (139, 140). It is interesting to note that the SUF system appears to be the most important in *Cyanobacteria*, and all the genes of the *suf* locus are essential. This could be why a dedicated regulator controls *suf* expression. Most of the Gram-positive bacteria possess only the SUF system; however, SufR seems to be underrepresented, with only two examples described in *Actinobacteria*: *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* and *Streptomyces avermitilis* (141, 142). How the *suf* locus is regulated in most of the Gram-positive bacteria lacking SufR is unknown.

Overall, IscR and, to a lesser extent, SufR appear to have primary functions as regulators of Fe-S biosynthesis. IscR is conserved among the bacterial species producing an ISC machinery and coordinates Fe-S biosynthesis with other cellular functions, including pathogenesis. In contrast, SufR was found only in *Cyanobacteria* and some *Actinobacteria* and is dedicated to regulating the *suf* locus. Both regulators coordinate Fe-S biogenesis with Fe-S bioavailability, and they are assisted in this task by stress-specific regulators such as Fur for iron availability, OxyR for oxidative stress, and NsrR for nitrosative stress.

## IRON-SULFUR PROTEIN ASSEMBLY AS AN ANTIPATHOGEN TARGET

The susceptibility of bacteria to host-distributed chemicals such as copper (Cu) ions, ROS, and RNS, which act, in part, to poison the Fe-S cluster-requiring proteins, implies that higher eukaryotes have evolved to prevent bacterial growth by targeting Fe-S protein assembly (5, 143, 144). High-density transposon screens or directed-mutagenesis
studies suggest that the assembly of Fe-S proteins is essential for many human bacte-
rial pathogens (6). Importantly, microbes synthesize Fe-S clusters using machineries
that are functionally similar but biochemically distinct from the machineries used by
higher eukaryotes. Bacteria defective in maturating Fe-S proteins have decreased viru-
lence or fitness in models of infection (6, 57, 145). An inability to assemble Fe-S pro-
teins affects numerous metabolic pathways, resulting in metabolic chaos. These facts
imply that Fe-S protein assembly is a viable target for antimicrobial therapy.

As an example, a small molecule called ‘882 decreased the activity of aconitase *in vivo* but not *in vitro* (146). A “pulldown” assay using immobilized ‘882 as bait found that it associates with SufBCD. SufC associated with ‘882 with a dissociation constant (K_d) for ‘882 of ~3 µM. These data led to the hypothesis that ‘882 inhibited Fe-S protein assembly by inhibiting Suf-dependent Fe-S cluster synthesis. The Suf system has also been proposed to be a target for other nonbacterial pathogens, including *Toxoplasma gondii* and *Plasmodium falciparum* (147). For the latter, the molecule D-cycloserine, which can form a covalent adduct with PLP, can inhibit the cysteine desulfuration SufS, resulting in growth inhibition (148).

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

New Fe-S cluster assembly factors are continually being discovered, lending support to the hypothesis that additional factors exist and that our current knowledge is incomplete. To move forward, we need to broaden our approaches by using newly available techniques and expand the organisms studied. Studies using *E. coli* and *A. vinelandii* have provided the bulk of the information about how bacteria assemble Fe-S proteins. These Gram-negative organisms are relatively unique in the fact that they have more than one biosynthetic system, which are, for the most part, functionally redundant. In contrast, very few studies have been conducted on Fe-S cluster assembly in Gram-positive bacteria, which typically encode only one Fe-S cluster biosynthesis system.

Several questions remain about Fe-S protein maturation and its regulation. The Fe and electron donors for Fe-S cluster synthesis and repair remain elusive. We also do not fully understand the mechanism by which Suf synthesizes Fe-S clusters or the functions of many factors utilized for maturating Fe-S proteins. We need to increase our understanding of how the Fe-S cluster assembly machinery is integrated with metabolic pathways that require Fe-S proteins. It is not well understood if Fe-S cluster carriers transfer Fe-S clusters to all apo-targets with the same efficacy or if there is an apo-protein hierarchy driven by carrier specificity. Understanding this integration will provide insights into metabolite balance and the consequences of decreasing metabolic flux through a pathway that requires an Fe-S protein since it is a costly process for the cells (149). This knowledge will be important not only for medicine and the development of specific anti-pathogen targets but also for scientists using organisms to conduct green chemistry. Inefficient Fe-S protein maturation, such as in organisms engineered to produce biofuels, fix dinitrogen, or generate secondary metabolites, could decrease the yields and the efficiency of desired processes, ultimately decreasing profits and productivity (150).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank members of the Boyd and Barras units for discussions.

Support to the Barras lab was provided by the ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID and the Pasteur Institute. The Boyd lab is funded by National Science Foundation award 1750624.

REFERENCES

1. Wofford JD, Bolaji N, Dziuba N, Outten FW, Lindahl PA. 2019. Evidence that a respiratory shield in *Escherichia coli* protects a low-molecular-mass Fe(II) pool from O₂-dependent oxidation. J Biol Chem 294:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.005233.

2. Blattner FR, Plunkett G, III, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, Collado-Vides J, Glasner JD, Rode CK, Mayhew GF, Gregor J, Davis NW, Kirkpatrick HA, Goeden MA, Rose DJ, Mau B, Shao Y. 1997. The complete

genome sequence of *Escherichia coli* K-12. Science 277:1453–1474.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5331.1453.

3. Rocha AG, Dancis A. 2016. Life without Fe-S clusters. Mol Microbiol 99: 821–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13273.

4. Jang S, Imlay JA. 2007. Micromolar intracellular hydrogen peroxide disrupts metabolism by damaging iron-sulfur enzymes. J Biol Chem 282: 929–937. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M607646200.
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

5. Imlay JA. 2006. Iron-sulphur clusters and the problem with oxygen. Mol Microbiol 59:1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05028.x.

6. Roberts CA, Al-Tameemi HM, Mashruwala AA, Rosario-Cruz Z, Chauhan U, Sause WE, Torres VJ, Belden WJ, Boyd JM. 2017. The Suf iron-sulfur cluster biosynthetic system is essential in *Staphylococcus aureus*, and decreased Suf function results in global metabolic defects and reduced survival in human neutrophils. Infect Immun 85:e00100-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00100-17.

7. Tanaka N, Kanazawa M, Tonosaki K, Yokoyama N, Kuzuyama T, Takahashi Y. 2016. Novel features of the ISC machinery revealed by characterization of *Escherichia coli* mutants that survive without iron-sulfur clusters. Mol Microbiol 99:835–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13271.

8. Yokoyama N, Nonaka C, Ohashi Y, Shioda M, Terahata T, Chen W, Sakamoto K, Maruyama C, Saito T, Yuda E, Tanaka N, Fujishiro T, Kuzuyama T, Asai K, Takahashi Y. 2018. Distinct roles for U-type proteins in iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis revealed by genetic analysis of the *Bacillus subtilis* sufCDSUB operon. Mol Microbiol 107:688–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13907.

9. Loiseau L, Gerez C, Bekker M, Ollagnier-de Choudens S, Py B, Sanakis Y, Teixeira de Mattos J, Fontecave M, Barras F. 2007. ErpA, an iron sulfur (Fe S) protein of the A-type essential for respiratory metabolism in *Escherichia coli*. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:13626–13631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705829104.

10. Roche B, Aussel L, Ezraty B, Mandin P, Py B, Barras F. 2013. Iron/sulfur proteins biogenesis in prokaryotes: formation, regulation and diversity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1827:455–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.12.010.

11. Takahashi Y, Tokumoto U. 2002. A third bacterial system for the assem-
bly of iron-sulfur clusters with homologs in archaea and plastids. J Biol
Chem 277:28380-28393. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C200365200.

12. Zheng L, Cash VL, Flint DH, Dean DR. 1998. Assembly of iron-sulfur clus-
ters. Identification of an *iscsUA-hscBA-fdx* gene cluster from *Azotobacter
vinelandii*. J Biol Chem 273:13264–13272. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc
.273.21.13264.

13. Zheng L, White RH, Cash VL, Jack RF, Dean DR. 1993. Cysteine desulfurase activity indicates a role for NIFS in metallocluster biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:2754–2758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.7.2754.

14. Buren S, Jimenez-Vicente E, Echavarri-Erasun C, Rubio LM. 2020. Biosynthesis of nitrogenase cofactors. Chem Rev 120:4921–4968. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00489.

15. Dinis P, Wieckowski BM, Roach PL. 2016. Metallocofactor assembly for [FeFe]-hydrogenases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 41:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2016.06.004.

16. Yuvaniyama P, Agar JN, Cash VL, Johnson MK, Dean DR. 2000. NifS-
directed assembly of a transient [2Fe-2S] cluster within the NifU protein.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:599–604. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.2
.599.

17. Boyd ES, Thomas KM, Dai Y, Boyd JM, Outten FW. 2014. Interplay between oxygen and Fe-S cluster biogenesis: insights from the Suf pathway. Biochemistry 53:5834–5847. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi500488r.

18. Rincon-Enriquez G, Crete P, Barras F, Py B. 2008. Biogenesis of Fe/S proteins and pathogenicity: IscR plays a key role in allowing Erwinia chrysanthemi to adapt to hostile conditions. Mol Microbiol 67:1257–1273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06118.x.

19. Layer G, Gaddam SA, Ayala-Castro CN, Ollagnier-de Choudens S, Lascoux D, Fontecave M, Outten FW. 2007. SufE transfers sulfur from SufS to SufB for iron-sulfur cluster assembly. J Biol Chem 282:13342–13350. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M608555200.

20. Agar JN, Krebs C, Frazzon J, Huynh BH, Dean DR, Johnson MK. 2000. IscU as a scaffold for iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis: sequential assembly of [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-4S] clusters in IscU. Biochemistry 39:7856–7862. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi000931n.

21. Wollers S, Layer G, Garcia-Serres R, Signor L, Clemancey M, Latour J-M, Fontecave M, Ollagnier de Choudens S. 2010. Iron-sulfur (Fe-S) cluster assem- bly: the SufBCD complex is a new type of Fe-S scaffold with a flavin redox cofactor. J Biol Chem 285:23331–23341. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.127449.

22. Hirabayashi K, Yuda E, Tanaka N, Katayama S, Iwasaki K, Matsumoto T, Kurisu G, Outten FW, Fukuyama K, Takahashi Y, Wada K. 2015. Functional dynamics revealed by the structure of the SufBCD complex, a novel ATP-binding cassette (ABC) protein that serves as a scaffold for iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis. J Biol Chem 290:29717–29731. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.680934.

23. Black KA, Dos Santos PC. 2015. Shared-intermediates in the biosynthesis of thio-cofactors: mechanism and functions of cysteine desulfuras and sulfur acceptors. Biochim Biophys Acta 1853:1470–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.10.018.

24. Selbach BP, Chung AH, Scott AD, George SJ, Cramer SP, Dos Santos PC. 2014. Fe-S cluster biogenesis in Gram-positive bacteria: SufU is a zinc-dependent sulfur transfer protein. Biochemistry 53:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi4011978.

25. Dai Y, Outten FW. 2012. The *E. coli* SufS-SufE sulfur transfer system is more resistant to oxidative stress than IscS-IscU. FEBS Lett 586: 4016–4022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.feb.2012.10.001.

26. Selbach BP, Pradhan PK, Dos Santos PC. 2013. Protected sulfur transfer reactions by the *Escherichia coli* Suf system. Biochemistry 52:4089–4096. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi4001479.

27. Selbach B, Earles E, Dos Santos PC. 2010. Kinetic analysis of the bisub-
strate cysteine desulfurase Sufs from *Bacillus subtilis*. Biochemistry 49:
8794–8802. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi101358k.

28. Liu Y, Sieprowska-Lupa M, Whitman WB, White RH. 2010. Cysteine is not the sulfur source for iron-sulfur cluster and methionine biosynthesis in the methanogenic archaeon *Methanococcus maripaludis*. J Biol Chem 285:31923–31929. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.152447.

29. Kim JH, Frederick RO, Reinen NM, Troupis AT, Markley JL. 2013. [2Fe-2S]-ferredoxin binds directly to cysteine desulfurase and supplies an electron for iron-sulfur cluster assembly but is displaced by the scaffold protein or bacterial frataxin. J Am Chem Soc 135:8117–8120. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja401950a.

30. Yan R, Konarev PV, Iannuzzi C, Adinolfi S, Roche B, Kelly G, Simon L, Martin SR, Py B, Barras F, Svergun DI, Pastore A. 2013. Ferredoxin competes with bacterial frataxin in binding to the desulfurase IscS. J Biol Chem 288:24777–24787. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.480327.

31. Yan R, Adinolfi S, Pastore A. 2015. Ferredoxin, in conjunction with NADPH and ferredoxin-NADP reductase, transfers electrons to the IscS/IscU complex to promote iron-sulfur cluster assembly. Biochim Biophys Acta 1854:1113–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bkapap.2015.02.002.

32. Agar JN, Yuvaniyama P, Jack RF, Cash VL, Smith AD, Dean DR, Johnson MK. 2000. Modular organization and identification of a mononuclear iron-binding site within the NifU protein. J Biol Inorg Chem 5:167–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007750050361.

33. Biegel E, Schmidt S, Gonzalez JM, Muller V. 2011. Biochemistry, evolution and physiological function of the Rnf complex, a novel ion-motive electron transport complex in prokaryotes. Cell Mol Life Sci 68:613–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0555-8.

34. Curatti L, Brown CS, Ludden PW, Rubio LM. 2005. Genes required for rapid expression of nitrogenase activity in *Azotobacter vinelandii*. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:6291–6296. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501216102.

35. Bridwell-Rabb J, Iannuzzi C, Pastore A, Barondeau DP. 2012. Effector role reversal during evolution: the case of frataxin in Isc-S cluster biosynthesis. Biochemistry 51:2506–2514. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi201628j.

36. Roche B, Huguenot A, Barras F, Py B. 2015. The iron-binding CyaY and IscX proteins assist the ISC-catalyzed Fe-S biogenesis in *Escherichia coli*. Mol Microbiol 95:605–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12888.

37. Roche B, Agrebi R, Huguenot A, Ollagnier de Choudens S, Barras F, Py B. 2015. Turning *Escherichia coli* into a frataxin-dependent organism. PLoS Genet 11:e1005134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005134.

38. Kim JH, Bothe JR, Frederick RO, Holder JC, Markley JL. 2014. Role of IscX in iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis in *Escherichia coli*. J Am Chem Soc 136: 7933–7942. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja501260h.

39. Prischi F, Konarev PV, Iannuzzi C, Pastore C, Adinolfi S, Martin SR, Svergun DI, Pastore A. 2010. Structural bases for the interaction of frataxin with the central components of iron-sulphur cluster assembly. Nat Commun 1:95. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1097.

40. Adinolfi S, Puglisi R, Crack JC, Iannuzzi C, Dal Piaz F, Konarev PV, Svergun DI, Martin S, Le Brun NE, Pastore A. 2017. The molecular bases of the dual regulation of bacterial iron sulfur cluster biogenesis by CyaY and IscX. Front Mol Biosci 4:97. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2017.00097.

41. Chahal HK, Outten FW. 2012. Separate FeS scaffold and carrier functions for SufB(2)C(2) and SufA during *in vitro* maturation of [2Fe2S] Fdx. J Inorg Biochem 116:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2012.06.008.

42. Landry AP, Cheng Z, Ding H. 2013. Iron binding activity is essential for the function of IscA in iron-sulphur cluster biogenesis. Dalton Trans 42: 3100–3106. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2dt32000b.

43. Garcia PS, Gribaldo S, Py B, Barras F. 2019. The SUF system: an ABC ATPase-dependent protein complex with a role in Fe-S cluster

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>
biogenesis. Res Microbiol 170:426-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2019.08.001.

44. Nachin L, Loiseau L, Expert D, Barras F. 2003. SufC: an unorthodox cytoplasmic ABC/ATPase required for [Fe-S] biogenesis under oxidative stress. EMBO J 22:427-437. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg061.

45. Petrovic A, Davis CT, Rangachari K, Clough B, Wilson RJ, Eccleston JF. 2008. Hydrodynamic characterization of the SufBC and SufCD complexes and their interaction with fluorescent adenosine nucleotides. Protein Sci 17:1264-1274. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.034652.108.

46. Koonin EV. 1993. A superfamily of ATPases with diverse functions containing either classical or deviant ATP-binding motif. J Mol Biol 229: 1165-1174. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1993.1115.

47. Saini A, Mapolelo DT, Chahal HK, Johnson MK, Outten FW. 2010. SufD and SufC ATPase activity are required for iron acquisition during in vivo Fe-S cluster formation on SufB. Biochemistry 49:9402-9412. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi1011546.

48. Hoff KG, Silberg JJ, Vickery LE. 2000. Interaction of the iron-sulfur cluster assembly protein IscU with the Hsc66/Hsc20 molecular chaperone system of *Escherichia coli*. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:7790-7795. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.130201997.

49. Bonomi F, lametti S, Morleo A, Ta D, Vickery LE. 2008. Studies on the mechanism of catalysis of iron-sulfur cluster transfer from IscU[2Fe2S] by HscA/HscB chaperones. Biochemistry 47:12795-12801. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi801565j.

50. Silberg JJ, Hoff KG, Tapley TL, Vickery LE. 2001. The Fe/S assembly protein IscU behaves as a substrate for the molecular chaperone Hsc66 from *Escherichia coli*. J Biol Chem 276:1696-1700. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M009542200.

51. Silberg JJ, Tapley TL, Hoff KG, Vickery LE. 2004. Regulation of the HscA ATPase reaction cycle by the co-chaperone HscB and the iron-sulfur cluster assembly protein IscU. J Biol Chem 279:53924-53931. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M40117200.

52. Puglisi R, Pastore A. 2018. The role of chaperones in iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis. FEBS Lett 592:4011-4019. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13245.

53. Vinella D, Brochier-Armanet C, Loiseau L, Talla E, Barras F. 2009. Iron-sulfur (Fe/S) protein biogenesis: phylogenomic and genetic studies of At-type carriers. PLoS Genet 5:e1000497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000497.

54. Vinella D, Loiseau L, Ollagnier de Choudens S, Fontecave M, Barras F. 2013. In vivo [Fe-S] cluster acquisition by IscR and NsrR, two stress regulators in *Escherichia coli*. Mol Microbiol 87:493-508. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12135.

55. Dos Santos PC, Smith AD, Frazzon J, Cash VL, Johnson MK, Dean DR. 2004. Iron-sulfur cluster assembly: NifU-directed activation of the nitrogenase Fe protein. J Biol Chem 279:19705-19711. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M400278200.

56. Mapolelo DT, Zhang B, Naik SG, Huynh BH, Johnson MK. 2012. Spectroscopic and functional characterization of iron-sulfur cluster-bound forms of *Azotobacter vinelandii* (Nif)IscA. Biochemistry 51:8071-8084. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi3006658.

57. Mashruwala AA, Pang YY, Rosario-Cruz Z, Chahal HK, Benson MA, Mike LA, Skaar EP, Torres VJ, Nauseef WM, Boyd JM. 2015. Nfu facilitates the maturation of iron-sulfur proteins and participates in virulence in *Staphylococcus aureus*. Mol Microbiol 95:383-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12860.

58. Mandin P, Chareyre S, Barras F. 2016. A regulatory circuit composed of a transcription factor, IscR, and a regulatory RNA, RyhB, controls Fe-S cluster delivery. mBio 7:e00966-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00966-16.

59. Morimoto K, Yamashita E, Kondou Y, Lee SJ, Arisaka F, Tsukihara T, Nakai M. 2006. The asymmetric IscA homodimer with an exposed [2Fe-2S] cluster suggests the structural basis of the Fe-S cluster biosynthetic scaffold. J Mol Biol 360:117-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.04.067.

60. Py B, Gerez C, Huguenot A, Vidaud C, Fontecave M, Ollagnier de Choudens S, Barras F. 2018. The ErpA/NfuA complex builds an oxidation-resistant Fe-S cluster delivery pathway. J Biol Chem 293:7689-7702. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.002160.

61. Gerstel A, Zamarreno Beas J, Duverger Y, Bouveret E, Barras F, Py B. 2020. Oxidative stress antagonizes fluoroquinolone drug sensitivity via the SoxR-SUF Fe-S cluster homeostatic axis. PLoS Genet 16:e1009198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009198.

62. Smith AD, Jameson GN, Dos Santos PC, Agar JN, Naik S, Krebs C, Frazzon J, Dean DR, Huynh BH, Johnson MK. 2005. NifS-mediated assembly of [4Fe-4S] clusters in the N- and C-terminal domains of the NifU scaffold protein. Biochemistry 44:12955-12969. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi051257i.

63. Angelini S, Gerez C, Ollagnier-de Choudens S, Sanakis Y, Fontecave M, Barras F, Py B. 2008. NfuA, a new factor required for maturing Fe/S proteins in *Escherichia coli* under oxidative stress and iron starvation conditions. J Biol Chem 283:14084-14091. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M709405200.

64. Bandyopadhyay S, Naik SG, O'Carroll IP, Huynh BH, Dean DR, Johnson MK, Dos Santos PC. 2008. A proposed role for the *Azotobacter vinelandii* NfuA protein as an intermediate iron-sulfur cluster carrier. J Biol Chem 283:14092-14099. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M709161200.

65. Py B, Gerez C, Angelini S, Planel R, Vinella D, Loiseau L, Talla E, Brochier-Armanet C, Garcia Serres R, Latour JM, Ollagnier-de Choudens S, Fontecave M, Barras F. 2012. Molecular organization, biochemical function, cellular role and evolution of NfuA, an atypical Fe-S carrier. Mol Microbiol 86:155-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08181.x.

66. McCarthy EL, Rankin AN, Dill ZR, Booker SJ. 2019. The A-type domain in *Escherichia coli* NfuA is required for regenerating the auxiliary [4Fe-4S] cluster in *Escherichia coli* lipoyl synthase. J Biol Chem 294:1609-1617. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.006171.

67. Jin Z, Heinnickel M, Krebs C, Shen G, Golbeck JH, Bryant DA. 2008. Biogenesis of iron-sulfur clusters in photosystem I: holo-NfuA from the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 rapidly and efficiently transfers [4Fe-4S] clusters to apo-PsaC in vitro. J Biol Chem 283:28426-28435. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M803395200.

68. Benoit SL, Holland AA, Johnson MK, Maier RJ. 2018. Iron-sulfur protein maturation in *Helicobacter pylori*: identifying a Nfu-type cluster carrier protein and its iron-sulfur protein targets. Mol Microbiol 108:379-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13942.

69. Skovran E, Downs DM. 2003. Lack of the ApbC or ApbE protein results in a defect in Fe-S cluster metabolism in *Salmonella enterica* serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol 185:98-106. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.1.98-106.2003.

70. Boyd JM, Pierik AJ, Netz DJ, Lill R, Downs DM. 2008. Bacterial ApbC can bind and effectively transfer iron-sulfur clusters. Biochemistry 47: 8195-8202. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi800551y.

71. Srinivasan V, Pierik AJ, Lill R. 2014. Crystal structures of nucleotide-free and glutathione-bound mitochondrial ABC transporter Atm1. Science 343:1137-1140. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246729.

72. Lewis JA, Escalante-Semerena JC. 2007. Tricarballylate catabolism in *Salmonella enterica*. The TcuB protein uses 4Fe-4S clusters and heme to transfer electrons from FADH2 in the tricarballylate dehydrogenase (TcuA) enzyme to electron acceptors in the cell membrane. Biochemistry 46:9107-9115. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi7006564.

73. Boyd JM, Teoh WP, Downs DM. 2012. Decreased transport restores growth of a *Salmonella enterica* apbC mutant on tricarballylate. J Bacteriol 194:576-583. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.05988-11.

74. Boyd JM, Lewis JA, Escalante-Semerena JC, Downs DM. 2008. *Salmonella enterica* requires ApbC function for growth on tricarballylate: evidence of functional redundancy between ApbC and IscU. J Bacteriol 190: 4596-4602. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00262-08.

75. Butland G, Babu M, Diaz-Mejia JJ, Bohdana F, Phanse S, Gold B, Yang W, Li J, Gagarinova AG, Pogoutse O, Mori H, Wanner BL, Lo H, Wasniewski J, Christopolous C, Ali M, Venn P, Safavi-Naini A, Sourour N, Caron S, Choi JY, Laigle L, Nazarians-Armavil A, Deshpande A, Joe S, Datsenko KA, Yamamoto N, Andrews BJ, Boone C, Ding H, Sheikh B, Moreno-Hagelseib G, Greenblatt JF, Emili A. 2008. eSGA: *E. coli* synthetic genetic array analysis. Nat Methods 5:789-795. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1239.

76. Yeung G, Gold B, Liu NL, Prathapam R, Sterling HJ, Williams ER, Butland G. 2011. The *E. coli* monothiol glutaredoxin GrxD forms homodimeric and heterodimeric FeS cluster containing complexes. Biochemistry 50: 8957-8969. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi2008883.

77. Iwema T, Picciocchi A, Traore DA, Ferrer JL, Chauvat F, Jacquamet L. 2009. Structural basis for delivery of the intact [Fe2S2] cluster by monothiol glutaredoxin. Biochemistry 48:6041-6043. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi900440m.

78. Boutigny S, Saini A, Baidoo EE, Yeung N, Keasling JD, Butland G. 2013. Physical and functional interactions of a monothiol glutaredoxin and an iron sulfur cluster carrier protein with the sulfur-donating radical S-adenosyl-L-methionine enzyme MiaB. J Biol Chem 288:14200-14211. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.460360.

79. Hider RC, Kong XL. 2011. Glutathione: a key component of the cytoplasmic labile iron pool. Biometals 24:1179-1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-011-9476-8.

80. Feng Y, Zhong N, Rouhier N, Hase T, Kusunoki M, Jacquot JP, Jin C, Xia B. 2006. Structural insight into poplar glutaredoxin C1 with a bridging iron-sulfur cluster at the active site. Biochemistry 45:7998-8008. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi060444t.
81. Mashruwala AA, Bhatt S, Poudel S, Boyd ES, Boyd JM. 2016. The DUF59 containing protein SufT is involved in the maturation of iron-sulfur (FeS) proteins during conditions of high FeS cofactor demand in *Staphylococcus aureus*. PLoS Gen 12:e1006233. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006233.

82. Paul VD, Lill R. 2014. Snapshot: eukaryotic Fe-S protein biogenesis. Cell Metab 20:384–384.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2014.07.010.

83. Stehling O, Mascarenhas J, Vashist AA, Sheftel AD, Niggemeyer B, Rosser R, Pierik AJ, Wohlschlegel JA, Lill R. 2013. Human CIA2A-FAM96A and CIA2B-FAM96B integrate iron homeostasis and maturation of different subsets of cytosolic-nuclear iron-sulfur proteins. Cell Metab 18: 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.06.015.

84. Luo D, Bernard DG, Balk J, Hai H, Cui X. 2012. The DUF59 family gene AE7 acts in the cytosolic iron-sulfur cluster assembly pathway to maintain nuclear genome integrity in *Arabidopsis*. Plant Cell 24:4135–4148. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.102608.

85. Mashruwala AA, Roberts CA, Bhatt S, May KL, Carroll RK, Shaw LN, Boyd JM. 2016. *Staphylococcus aureus* SufT: an essential iron-sulfur cluster assembly factor in cells experiencing a high-demand for lipoic acid. Mol Microbiol 102:1099–1109. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13539.

86. Huet G, Daffe M, Saves I. 2005. Identification of the *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* SUF machinery as the exclusive mycobacterial system of [Fe-S] cluster assembly: evidence for its implication in the pathogen's survival. J Bacteriol 187:6137–6146. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.17.6137-6146.2005.

87. Rodriguez-Manzaneque MT, Tamarit J, Belli G, Ros J, Herrero E. 2002. Grx5 is a mitochondrial glutaredoxin required for the activity of iron/sulfur enzymes. Mol Biol Cell 13:1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.01-10-0517.

88. Gardner PR, Fridovich I. 1993. Effect of glutathione on aconitase in *Escherichia coli*. Arch Biochem Biophys 301:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1993.1120.

89. Thorgersen MP, Downs DM. 2008. Analysis of yggX and gshA mutants provides insights into the labile iron pool in Salmonella enterica. J Bacteriol 190:7608–7613. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00639-08.

90. Nappi AJ, Vass E. 1997. Comparative studies of enhanced iron-mediated production of hydroxyl radical by glutathione, cysteine, ascorbic acid, and selected catechols. Biochim Biophys Acta 1336:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4165(97)00039-1.

91. Zhang B, Bandyopadhyay S, Shakamura P, Naik SG, Huynh BH, Couturier J, Rouhier N, Johnson MK. 2013. Monothiol glutaredoxins can bind linear [Fe3S4]+ and [Fe4S4]2+ clusters in addition to [Fe2S2]2+ clusters: spectroscopic characterization and functional implications. J Am Chem Soc 135:15153–15164. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja407059n.

92. Qi W, Li J, Chain CY, Pasquevich GA, Pasquevich AF, Cowan JA. 2012. Glutathione complexed Fe-S centers. J Am Chem Soc 134:10745–10748. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja302186j.

93. Newton GL, Rawat M, La Clair JJ, Jothivasan VK, Budiarto T, Hamilton CJ, Claiborne A, Helmann JD, Fahey RC. 2009. Bacillus thielii is an antioxidant thiol produced in Bacilli. Nat Chem Biol 5:625–627. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.189.

94. Rosario-Cruz Z, Chahal HK, Mike LA, Skaar EP, Boyd JM. 2015. Bacillithiol has a role in Fe-S cluster biogenesis in *Staphylococcus aureus*. Mol Microbiol 98:218–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13115.

95. Fang Z, Dos Santos PC. 2015. Protective role of bacillithiol in superoxide stress and Fe-S metabolism in *Bacillus subtilis*. Microbiologyopen 4: 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo.3267.

96. Rosario-Cruz Z, Boyd JM. 2016. Physiological roles of bacillithiol in intracellular metal processing. Curr Genet 62:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-015-0511-0.

97. Gelling C, Dawes IW, Richardt N, Lill R, Muhlenhoff U. 2008. Mitochondrial Iba57p is required for Fe/S cluster formation on aconitase and activation of radical SAM enzymes. Mol Cell Biol 28:1851–1861. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01963-07.

98. Waller JC, Alvarez S, Naponelli V, Lara-Nunez A, Blaby IK, Da Silva V, Ziemak MJ, Vickers TJ, Beverley SM, Edison AS, Rocca JR, Gregory JF, III, de Crecy-Lagard V, Hanson AD. 2010. A role for tetrahydrofolates in the metabolism of iron-sulfur clusters in all domains of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:10412–10417. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911586107.

99. Teplyakov A, Obmolova G, Sarikaya E, Pullalarevu S, Krajewski W, Galkin A, Howard AJ, Herzberg O, Gilliland GL. 2004. Crystal structure of the YgfZ protein from Escherichia coli suggests a folate-dependent regulatory role in one-carbon metabolism. J Bacteriol 186:7134–7140. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.21.7134-7140.2004.

100. Justino MC, Vicente JB, Teixeira M, Saraiva LM. 2005. New genes implicated in the protection of anaerobically grown Escherichia coli against nitric oxide. J Biol Chem 280:2636–2643. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M411070200.

101. Filenko N, Spiro S, Browning DF, Squire D, Overton TW, Cole J, Constantinidou C. 2007. The NsrR regulon of *Escherichia coli* K-12 includes genes encoding the hybrid cluster protein and the periplasmic, respiratory nitrite reductase. J Bacteriol 189:4410–4417. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00080-07.

102. Bodenmiller DM, Spiro S. 2006. The *yjeB (nsrR)* gene of *Escherichia coli* encodes a nitric oxide-sensitive transcriptional regulator. J Bacteriol 188: 874–881. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.188.3.874-881.2006.

103. Justino MC, Almeida CC, Teixeira M, Saraiva LM. 2007. Escherichia coli diiron YtfE protein is necessary for the repair of stress-damaged iron-sulfur clusters. J Biol Chem 282:10352–10359. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M610656200.

104. Overton TW, Justino MC, Li Y, Baptista JM, Melo AM, Cole JA, Saraiva LM. 2008. Widespread distribution in pathogenic bacteria of di-iron proteins that repair oxidative and nitrosative damage to iron-sulfur centers. J Bacteriol 190:2004–2013. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01733-07.

105. Strube K, de Vries S, Cramm R. 2007. Formation of a dinitrosyl iron complex by NorA, a nitric oxide-binding di-iron protein from Ralstonia eutropha H16. J Biol Chem 282:20292–20300. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M702003200.

106. Nobre LS, Garcia-Serres R, Todorovic S, Hildebrandt P, Teixeira M, Latour JM, Saraiva LM. 2014. Escherichia coli RIC is able to donate iron to iron-sulfur clusters. PLoS One 9:e95222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095222.

107. Silva LSO, Baptista JM, Batley C, Andrews SC, Saraiva LM. 2018. The diiron RIC protein (YtfE) of Escherichia coli interacts with the DNA-binding protein from starved cells (Dps) to diminish RIC protein-mediated redox stress. J Bacteriol 200:e00527-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00527-18.

108. Mashruwala AA, Boyd JM. 2017. The *Staphylococcus aureus* SrrAB regulatory system modulates hydrogen peroxide resistance factors, which imparts protection to aconitase during aerobic growth. PLoS One 12: e0170283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170283.

109. Mashruwala AA, Van De Guchte A, Boyd JM. 2017. Impaired respiration elicits SrrAB-dependent programmed cell lysis and biofilm formation in *Staphylococcus aureus*. Elife 6:e23845. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23845.

110. Lo FC, Hsieh CC, Maestre-Reyna M, Chen CY, Ko TP, Horng YC, Lai YC, Chiang YW, Chou CM, Chiang CH, Huang WN, Lin YH, Bohle DS, Liaw WF. 2016. Crystal structure analysis of the repair of iron centers protein YtfE and its interaction with NO. Chemistry 22:9768–9776. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201600990.

111. Balasiny B, Rolfe MD, Vine C, Bradley C, Green J, Cole J. 2018. Release of nitric oxide by the *Escherichia coli* YtfE (RIC) protein and its reduction by the hybrid cluster protein in an integrated pathway to minimize cytoplasmic nitrosative stress. Microbiology (Reading) 164:563–575. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000629.

112. Davis KM, Krupp J, Clark S, Isberg RR. 2019. Iron-sulfur cluster repair contributes to *Yersinia pseudotuberculosis* survival within deep tissues. Infect Immun 87:e00533-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00533-19.

113. Harrington JC, Wong SM, Rosadini CV, Garifulin O, Boyartchuk V, Akerley JB. 2009. Resistance of *Haemophilus influenzae* to reactive nitrogen donors and gamma interferon-stimulated macrophages requires the formate-dependent nitrite reductase regulator-activated ytfE gene. Infect Immun 77:1945–1958. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01365-08.

114. Rajagopalan S, Teter SJ, Zwart PH, Brennan RG, Phillips KJ, Kiley PJ. 2013. Studies of IscR reveal a unique mechanism for metal-dependent regulation of DNA binding specificity. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:740–747. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2568.

115. Fleischhacker AS, Stubna A, Hsueh KL, Guo Y, Teter SJ, Rose JC, Brunold TC, Markley JL, Munck E, Kiley PJ. 2012. Characterization of the [2Fe-2S] cluster of *Escherichia coli* transcription factor IscR. Biochemistry 51: 4453–4462. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi3003204.

116. Bak DW, Elliott SJ. 2014. Alternative FeS cluster ligands: tuning redox potentials and chemistry. Curr Opin Chem Biol 19:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.12.015.

117. Nesbit AD, Giel JL, Rose JC, Kiley PJ. 2009. Sequence-specific binding to a subset of IscR-regulated promoters does not require IscR Fe-S cluster ligation. J Mol Biol 387:28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.055.

118. Giel JL, Rodionov D, Liu M, Blattner FR, Kiley PJ. 2006. IscR-dependent gene expression links iron-sulphur cluster assembly to the control of
O2-regulated genes in *Escherichia coli*. Mol Microbiol 60:1058-1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05160.x.

119. Yeo WS, Lee JH, Lee KC, Roe JH. 2006. IscR acts as an activator in response to oxidative stress for the suf operon encoding Fe-S assembly proteins. Mol Microbiol 61:206-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05220.x.

120. Lee KC, Yeo WS, Roe JH. 2008. Oxidant-responsive induction of the suf operon, encoding a Fe-S assembly system, through Fur and IscR in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 190:8244-8247. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01161-08.

121. Desnoyers G, Morissette A, Prevost K, Masse E. 2009. Small RNA-induced differential degradation of the polycistronic mRNA *iscRSUA*. EMBO J 28: 1551-1561. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.116.

122. Fontenot CR, Tasnim H, Valdes KA, Popescu CV, Ding H. 2020. Ferric uptake regulator (Fur) reversibly binds a [2Fe-2S] cluster to sense intracellular iron homeostasis in *Escherichia coli*. J Biol Chem 295: 15454-15463. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.014814.

123. Outten FW, Djaman O, Storz G. 2004. A *suf* operon requirement for Fe-S cluster assembly during iron starvation in *Escherichia coli*. Mol Microbiol 52:861-872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04025.x.

124. Partridge JD, Bodenmiller DM, Humphrys MS, Spiro S. 2009. NsrR targets in the *Escherichia coli* genome: new insights into DNA sequence requirements for binding and a role for NsrR in the regulation of motility. Mol Microbiol 73:680-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06799.x.

125. Ezraty B, Vergnes A, Banzhaf M, Duverger Y, Huguenot A, Brochado AR, Su SY, Espinosa L, Loiseau L, Py B, Typas A, Barras F. 2013. Fe-S cluster biosynthesis controls uptake of aminoglycosides in a ROS-less death pathway. Science 340:1583-1587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238328.

126. Chareyre S, Barras F, Mandin P. 2019. A small RNA controls bacterial sensitivity to gentamicin during iron starvation. PLoS Genet 15:e1008078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008078.

127. Simon G, Mejean V, Jourlin C, Chippaux M, Pascal MC. 1995. The torR gene of Escherichia coli encodes a response regulator protein involved in the expression of the trimethylamine N-oxide reductase genes. J Bacteriol 177:275. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.177.1.275-275.1995.

128. Baraquet C, Theraulaz L, Guiral M, Lafitte D, Mejean V, Jourlin-Castelli C. 2006. TorT, a member of a new periplasmic binding protein family, triggers induction of the Tor respiratory system upon trimethylamine N-oxide electron-acceptor binding in *Escherichia coli*. J Biol Chem 281: 38189-38199. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M604321200.

129. Carey JN, Mettert EL, Roggiani M, Myers KS, Kiley PJ, Goulian M. 2018. Regulated stochasticity in a bacterial signaling network permits tolerance to a rapid environmental change. Cell 175:1989-1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.051.

130. Kim SH, Lee BY, Lau GW, Cho YH. 2009. IscR modulates catalase A (KatA) activity, peroxide resistance and full virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:1520-1526. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.0906.06028.

131. Jones-Carson J, Laughlin J, Hamad MA, Stewart AL, Voskuil MI, Vazquez-Torres A. 2008. Inactivation of [Fe-S] metalloproteins mediates nitric oxide-dependent killing of Burkholderia mallei. PLoS One 3:e1976. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001976.

132. Lim JG, Choi SH. 2014. IscR is a global regulator essential for pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus and induced by host cells. Infect Immun 82: 569-578. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01141-13.

133. Vergnes A, Viala JPM, Ouadad-Tsabet R, Pocachard B, Loiseau L, Meresse S, Barras F, Aussel L. 2017. The iron-sulfur cluster sensor IscR is a negative regulator of SpiI type III secretion system in Salmonella enterica. Cell Microbiol 19:e12680. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12680.

134. Miller HK, Kwuan L, Schwiesow L, Bernick DL, Mettert E, Ramirez HA, Ragle JM, Chan PP, Kiley PJ, Lowe TM, Auerbuch V. 2014. IscR is essential for Yersinia pseudotuberculosis type III secretion and virulence. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004194.

135. Choi G, Jang KK, Lim JG, Lee ZW, Im H, Choi SH. 2020. The transcriptional regulator IscR integrates host-derived nitrosative stress and iron starvation in activation of the *vvhBA* operon in *Vibrio vulnificus*. J Biol Chem 295:5350-5361. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.012724.

136. Haines S, Arnaud-Barbe N, Poncet D, Reverchon S, Wawrzyniak J, Nasser W, Renauld-Mongenie G. 2015. IscR regulates synthesis of colonization factor antigen I fimbriae in response to iron starvation in enterotoxigenic *Escherichia coli*. J Bacteriol 197:2896-2907. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00214-15.

137. Wu Y, Outten FW. 2009. IscR controls iron-dependent biofilm formation in *Escherichia coli* by regulating type I fimbria expression. J Bacteriol 191: 1248-1257. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01086-08.

138. Fuangthong M, Jittawuttipoka T, Wisitkamol R, Romsang A, Duang-Nkern J, Vattanaviboon P, Mongkolsuk S. 2015. IscR plays a role in oxidative stress resistance and pathogenicity of a plant pathogen, *Xanthomonas campestris*. Microbiol Res 170:139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2014.08.004.

139. Wang T, Shen G, Balasubramanian R, McIntosh L, Bryant DA, Golbeck JH. 2004. The *sufR* gene (*sll0088* in *Synechocystis* sp. strain PCC 6803) functions as a repressor of the *sufBCDS* operon in iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis in cyanobacteria. J Bacteriol 186:956-967. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.4.956-967.2004.

140. Shen G, Balasubramanian R, Wang T, Wu Y, Hoffart LM, Krebs C, Bryant DA, Golbeck JH. 2007. SufR coordinates two [4Fe-4S]2+,1+ clusters and functions as a transcriptional repressor of the *sufBCDS* operon and an autoregulator of *sufR* in cyanobacteria. J Biol Chem 282:31909-31919. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M705554200.

141. Cheng Y, Lyu M, Yang R, Wen Y, Song Y, Li J, Chen Z. 2020. SufR, a [4Fe-4S] cluster-containing transcription factor, represses the *sufRBCDSU* operon in *Streptomyces avermitilis* iron-sulfur cluster assembly. Appl Environ Microbiol 86:e01523-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01523-20.

142. Willemse D, Weber B, Masino L, Warren RM, Adinolfi S, Pastore A, Williams MJ. 2018. Rv1460, a SufR homologue, is a repressor of the *suf* operon in *Mycobacterium tuberculosis*. PLoS One 13:e0200145. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200145.

143. Macomber L, Imlay JA. 2009. The iron-sulfur clusters of dehydratases are primary intracellular targets of copper toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:8344-8349. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812808106.

144. Tan G, Cheng Z, Pang Y, Landry AP, Li J, Lu J, Ding H. 2014. Copper binding in IscA inhibits iron-sulphur cluster assembly in *Escherichia coli*. Mol Microbiol 93:629-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12676.

145. Valentino MD, Foulston L, Sadaka A, Kos VN, Villet RA, Santa Maria J, Jr, Lazinski DW, Camilli A, Walker S, Hooper DC, Gilmore MS. 2014. Genes contributing to *Staphylococcus aureus* fitness in abscess- and infection-related ecologies. mBio 5:e01729-14. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01729-14.

146. Choby JE, Mike LA, Mashruwala AA, Dutter BF, Dunman PM, Sulikowski GA, Boyd JM, Skaar EP. 2016. A small-molecule inhibitor of iron-sulfur cluster assembly uncovers a link between virulence regulation and metabolism in *Staphylococcus aureus*. Cell Chem Biol 23:1351-1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.09.012.

147. Tonini ML, Pena-Diaz P, Haindrich AC, Basu S, Kriegova E, Pierik AJ, Lill R, MacNeill SA, Smith TK, Lukes J. 2018. Branched late-steps of the cytosolic iron-sulphur cluster assembly machinery of Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007326.

148. Charan M, Singh N, Kumar B, Srivastava K, Siddiqi MI, Habib S. 2014. Sulfur mobilization for Fe-S cluster assembly by the essential SUF pathway in the *Plasmodium falciparum* apicoplast and its inhibition. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3389-3398. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02711-13.

149. Corless EI, Mettert EL, Kiley PJ, Antony E. 2020. Elevated expression of a functional Suf pathway in *Escherichia coli* BL21(DE3) enhances recombinant production of an iron-sulfur cluster-containing protein. J Bacteriol 202:e00496-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00496-19.

150. Shomar H, Garcia PS, Fernández-Fueyo E, D'Angelo F, Pelosse M, Manuel RR, Büke F, Liu S, van den Broek N, Duraffourg N, de Ram C, Pabst M, Gribaldo S, Py B, de Choudens SO, Bokinsky G, Barras F. 2021. Resolving phylogenetic and biochemical barriers to functional expression of heterologous iron-sulphur cluster enzymes. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.02.429153.

151. Ding H, Clark RJ. 2004. Characterization of iron binding in IscA, an ancient iron-sulphur cluster assembly protein. Biochem J 379(2):433-440. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20031702.

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>