# Amphioxus as a model to study the evolution of development in chordates

Salvatore d'Aniello, Stephanie Bertrand, Hector Escriva

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Salvatore d'Aniello, Stephanie Bertrand, Hector Escriva. Amphioxus as a model to study the evolution of development in chordates. eLife, 2023, 12, 10.7554/eLife.87028. hal-04211427

HAL Id: hal-04211427

https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-04211427

Submitted on 19 Sep 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

THE NATURAL HISTORY OF MODEL ORGANISMS

# Amphioxus as a model to study the evolution of development in chordates

**Abstract** Cephalochordates and tunicates represent the only two groups of invertebrate chordates, and extant cephalochordates – commonly known as amphioxus or lancelets – are considered the best proxy for the chordate ancestor, from which they split around 520 million years ago. Amphioxus has been an important organism in the fields of zoology and embryology since the 18th century, and the morphological and genomic simplicity of cephalochordates (compared to vertebrates) makes amphioxus an attractive model for studying chordate biology at the cellular and molecular levels. Here we describe the life cycle of amphioxus, and discuss the natural histories and habitats of the different species of amphioxus. We also describe their use as laboratory animal models, and discuss the techniques that have been developed to study different aspects of amphioxus.

SALVATORE D'ANIELLO*, STEPHANIE BERTRAND, HECTOR ESCRIVA*

## Introduction

Cephalochordates, commonly known as amphioxus or lancelets, belong to the monophyletic group of chordates, which also includes tunicates and vertebrates (Figure 1A). Amphioxus are marine benthic animals that feed on phyto- and zooplankton by filtering the seawater, and they are distributed worldwide in sandy habitats of tropical and temperate seas (Bertrand and Escriva, 2011).

A fascinating drawing by the Italian scientific illustrator Comingio Merculiano in the late 18th century captures the lifestyle of amphioxus (Figure 2). Unlike the adult, the embryos and larvae are planktonic and, depending on the species, the larval phase can last up to several months in the open sea. Therefore, amphioxus have a high potential for offshore larval dispersion in new coastal areas until they undergo the process of metamorphosis and become juveniles. The juveniles already show the typical adult body plan and, at this stage, they adopt a benthic lifestyle, prevalently buried in the substrate.

The name cephalochordate (i.e., cephalo-head) and -chordate (notochord)), which was proposed by Ernst Haeckel in the 1860s (Haeckel, 1866), does a good job of describing the peculiarity of their anatomy, with the notochord

extending to the front of the animal, beyond the cerebral vesicle (i.e. the most anterior structure of the central nervous system). The anatomy of cephalochordates is considered vertebrate-like, but simpler, having a prototypical chordate body plan. Chordate synapomorphies, present in amphioxus and vertebrates, include a dorsal hollow nerve chord and notochord, pharyngeal slits, segmented muscles and gonads, post anal tail, and homologs of pronephric kidney, pituitary and thyroid (Figure 1B). However, some typical vertebrate characteristics are not present in amphioxus such as paired sensory organs (image-forming eyes or ears), paired appendages and migrating neural crest cells. Their embryonic development includes 10 developmental periods, from the zygote to the adult (Carvalho et al., 2021; Bertrand et al., 2021), which are extremely well conserved among different amphioxus species.

An interesting anatomical feature of amphioxus development concerns their symmetry. In fact, larvae are completely asymmetrical, with the mouth and anus on the left side of the body. However, this asymmetry mostly disappears during metamorphosis, which produces an almost symmetrical adult animal (Paris et al., 2008).

*For correspondence: salvatore.daniello@szn.it (SD'A); hector.escriva@obs-banyuls.fr (HE)

**Competing interest:** The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

**Funding:** See page 10

**Reviewing Editor:** Helena Pérez Valle, eLife, United Kingdom

© Copyright D'Aniello et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the [Creative Commons Attribution License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Deuterostome phylogeny and body plan for amphioxus. (A) Deuterostomes are subdivided into ambulacraria (echinoderms and hemichordates) and chordates (cephalochordates, tunicates and vertebrates). Cephalochordates, which are commonly known as amphioxus or lancelets, are further divided into three genera: *Branchiostoma*, *Epigonichtys* and *Asymmetron*. Whole genome duplication (WGD) occurred specifically in vertebrates. (B). Photograph of a *Branchiostoma lanceolatum* specimen exhibiting the typical body morphology shared by all cephalochordates. The body is elongated, with pointed extremities hence its name which comes from the Greek "amphi = both" and "oxus = pointed", and a series of chordate synapomorphies are indicated, such as the dorsal nerve chord and notochord, pharyngeal slits, segmented muscles and gonads, atriopore, caudal fin and post anal tail. Anterior is to the left and dorsal to the top.</figcaption></figure>

The amphioxus genome also shows a high degree of conservation with vertebrate genomes, but with specific features. Amphioxus has orthologues for mostly all known vertebrate gene families, and the gene position and order in the genome, known as synteny, is also highly conserved which greatly benefits comparative analyses with vertebrates (*Putnam et al., 2008*; *Marlétaz et al., 2018*). However, the amphioxus genome has not undergone the two complete duplications that the vertebrate ancestor experienced (*Figure 1A*), although it has undergone numerous specific gene duplications (*Brasó-Vives et al., 2022*).

Moreover, the regulation of gene expression is much simpler than in vertebrates (*Gil-Gálvez et al., 2022*). And although it is still a point of debate, the amphioxus three-dimensional chromatin structure also seems to be less complicated

than the vertebrate's one (*Acemel et al., 2016*; *Huang et al., 2023*). Altogether, the crucial phylogenetic position, conserved morphological traits and genome organization make amphioxus a useful organism for answering fundamental questions in biology, particularly with respect to vertebrate evolution. Thus, over the last decades, cephalochordates have become an important animal model in the fields of evolutionary developmental biology (EvoDevo), immune system evolution, cell signalling, regeneration and genome evolution.

**Systematics and diversity**

The proposed phylogenetic position of cephalochordates has, as with many other metazoan groups, undergone major changes in recent years. Cephalochordates used to be classified
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** A drawing by Comingio Merculiano showing *Amphioxus lanceolatus* (now known as *Branchiostoma lanceolatum*). This drawing of adult amphioxus is based on research done at the Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn (SZN) between 1880 and 1890. Some of the amphioxus in the drawing are buried in the sand at the bottom of the sea, which is a relatively rare occurrence. The typical anatomical features of chordates (see **Figure 1B**) are clearly visible, which is a testament to the accuracy of Merculiano's drawings.</figcaption></figure>

Image courtesy of Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn - Archivio Storico; used with permission (SZN 2022 (L6) Prot. n. 6630). This image is not covered by the CC-BY 4.0 license and further reproduction of this panel would need permission from the copyright holder.

as the closest group to vertebrates within the chordates, one of the two deuterostome clades together with the Ambulacraria (Figure 1A). This position, as a sister group of vertebrates, was based above all on the conservation of numerous morphological characteristics, and also on some molecular studies based on rDNA (Winchell et al., 2002). Moreover, the other chordate subphylum, the tunicates, shows a great divergence at the morphological level, especially in adults, whose body plan is completely different from that of the prototypical chordate.

However, this classification has completely changed following studies using larger molecular data, which finally positioned the cephalochordate lineage as the earliest divergent group of chordates (Bourlat et al., 2006; Delsuc et al., 2006; Delsuc et al., 2008), and placing the tunicates as the sister group of the vertebrates. This new chordate phylogeny suggests an evolutionary explanation of why tunicates, despite their tremendous anatomical and genomic divergence, share some features with vertebrates that

are absent in amphioxus such as migratory cells similar to those of the neural crest, or placode-like ectodermal regions (Abitua et al., 2015; Manni et al., 2004; Horie et al., 2018).

Another consequence of this newly proposed phylogenetic classification is a change in the hypothesis about the ancestral chordate lifestyle. In the past, it was hypothesised that vertebrates arose by neoteny from a sessile organism with free-living tadpole larvae (like ascidians) (Williams, 1996). Placing cephalochordates as the earliest divergent chordates suggests that instead the ancestral chordate could have been amphioxus-like with a free-living lifestyle even at the adult stage. This hypothesis is also reinforced by the fact that early vertebrate fossils, such as Haikouichthys or Haikouella, are similar to amphioxus in many aspects, such as their small size or their mobile and filter-feeding lifestyle (Mallatt and Chen, 2003; Shu et al., 2003a; Shu et al., 2003b).

Unfortunately, clear cephalochordate fossils have not yet been found. For many years,
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** The life cycle of amphioxus includes benthic and pelagic phases. Adults live at the bottom of the sea during the benthic phase (1); external fertilization takes place in the water column during the breeding season; embryos and larvae then join the planktonic community near the surface during the pelagic phase (2). The length of time spent near the surface depends on the species (and varies from a few weeks to several months). Metamorphosis results in the mouth migrating from the left side of the larvae to a ventral and midline position (juvenile/adults). This is accompanied by a significant change in food intake strategy and a shift from pelagic to benthic behaviour.</figcaption></figure>

Pikaia, the Cambrian fossil from Burgess Shale in Canada, has been considered a basal chordate, but numerous features such as dorsal organ, posterior ventral area, posterior fusiform structure, anterior dorsal unit, and sigmoid rather than chevron-shaped muscles, divide the paleontological community about the exact phylogenetic position of this controversial fossil, even if its unresolved position is most probably within chordates (*Morris and Caron, 2012; Mallatt and Holland, 2013*).

In 1774, the first scientific description of a specimen of amphioxus was made by Pallas from an animal from off the coast of Cornwall (United Kingdom) (*Pallas et al., 1774*). Years later, amphioxus were rediscovered in the Mediterranean Sea first by *Costa, 1834*, and, two years later, independently, by *Yarrell, 1836*. Apart from the difference in the nomenclature, the Cornish and Mediterranean specimens were considered the same species, *Branchiostoma lanceolatum*.

In 1847, Gray described a new specimen from the coast of Borneo, which he called *Branchiostoma belcheri* (*Gray, 1847*). Shortly

afterwards, in 1852, a new species was described off Peru by Sundevall and named *Branchiostoma elongatum* (*Sundevall, 1852*). The same year, *B. lanceolatum* was also observed off northern Germany (*Sundevall, 1852*). It was then that a system capable of species classification became necessary, and the enumeration of myotomes anterior to the atriopore, between the atriopore and anus, and posterior to the anus was chosen, the global morphology being extremely similar between all described cephalochordates. Thus, the classification soon included four species (*B. lanceolatum*, *B. belcheri*, *B. elongatum* and *Branchiostoma caribbaeum*, described from the coasts of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, *Sundevall, 1853*), distributed in a rather cosmopolitan way between the Mediterranean, the Atlantic and the Pacific oceans.

In 1876, based on differences in pharyngeal slits position and fin shape in animals from Torres Strait in Australia, Peters described a second cephalochordate genus, which he called *Epigonichthys* (*Peters, 1876*). Although a later study reclassified the same species as belonging to the
genus *Branchiostoma* (*Günther and Reptilia, 1882*), *Epigonichthys* was later recognised as a new genus.

Finally, in 1893, Andrews described a third genus of cephalochordates, *Asymmetron*, for specimens from the Bahamas which he named *Asymmetron lucayanum* (*Andrews, 1893*). The main characteristics of this third genus were the presence of a single row of gonads and the asymmetrical metapleural folds, the left one ending at the level of the anus, while the right one was continuous behind with the ventral median fin. From this period on, many researchers began to describe new specimens from different locations and to define the classification of cephalochordates on the basis of the aforementioned meristic characteristics. This gave rise to discussions, with numerous synonyms for the same species or different species sharing the same name. Thus, new genera and subgenera were proposed, such as *Amphioxus*, *Heteropleuron*, *Amphioxides*, *Dolichorhynchus*, *Paramphioxus*, etc.

During this period, more than fifty species and ten genera of lancelets were described. Nevertheless, it was not until 1996 that Poss and Boschung made a compilation of all the described species and genera, and re-examined the different meristic data of each, to produce a list as correct as possible of the lancelet species described in the world (*Poss and Boschung, 1996*). This study reduced the total number of species to 29, and the number of genera to two, *Branchiostoma* and *Epigonichthys*. However, they defined *Asymmetron* as a synonym of *Epigonichthys*, since they failed to detect synapomorphies of the *Epigonichthys* group that would exclude *Epigonichthys lucayanum* (today called *Asymmetron lucayanum*) from this group. Thus, in the absence of arguments to support the fact that *E. lucayanum* (i.e. *A. lucayanum*) is the sister-taxon to all other *Epigonichthys*, they followed the classification proposed by *Richardson and McKenzie, 1994* with only two genera (*Epigonichthys* and *Branchiostoma*) instead of three genera as proposed in *Piyakarnchana and Vajropala, 1961*.

Poss and Boschung described the challenge of classifying the different species of amphioxus through the use of meristic data as follows: "Multivariate analysis of meristic variation, using primarily American species, reveals considerable intraspecific variability in key taxonomic features. Some species exhibit wide variation in countable segments, whereas others are characterized by a narrow range" (*Poss and Boschung, 1996*). Furthermore, they clearly advocated the use of molecular techniques capable of distinguishing

genetic differences and discriminating taxa with small morphological differences. In fact, it was through the use of modern molecular approaches, as well as through detailed morphological descriptions, that Nishikawa and Nohara confirmed the existence of three genera, *Branchiostoma*, *Asymmetron* and *Epigonichthys* (*Nishikawa, 2004; Nohara et al., 2005*). Two of them, *Asymmetron* and *Epigonichthys*, possess asymmetrical dextral gonads, and the third one, *Branchiostoma*, symmetrical gonads (*Igawa et al., 2017*).

The use of molecular taxonomy to define species has brought some other surprises in the classification of amphioxus species, since it revealed the existence of cryptic species among animals that previously shared the same name. Thus, for example, specimens of *B. belcheri* from the Chinese and Japanese coasts were differentiated into two different species (*B. belcheri* and *Branchiostoma tsingtauense*) (*Wang, 2004; Xu et al., 2005*) even if later, according to the rule of priority, the name of *B. tsingtauense* was changed by *B. japonicum* (*Wang, 2004; Zhang et al., 2006*).

Another example of a cryptic species complex, revealed through the use of molecular approaches, concerns *A. lucayanum*, for which up to three genetically distinguished major groups of geographical populations have been discovered. For one of these groups, composed of animals collected in the Red Sea, the name *Asymmetron rubrum* has even been proposed (*Subirana et al., 2020; Kon et al., 2006*). Thus, all these studies suggest that the total number of amphioxus species in the world is probably underestimated, and that molecular characterization is likely to increase the total number of extant species in the near future.

## Distribution

The different amphioxus species can be found in a cosmopolitan way in all tropical and temperate oceans of the world. Amphioxus have never been observed in freshwater, and although they are present worldwide, they have a preference for soils of more or less fine sand or shell deposits, and in most cases with little organic decay (see below). However, they are not always present in all suitable sandy sediments, which indicate that other factors, such as pollution or currents, may play an important role in the dynamic distribution of these benthic animals. Of course, this distribution refers to adult animals, which have a benthic lifestyle and are generally found at depths
between very shallow water (i.e. 0.5 m deep) to
30–50 meters deep. There are also some excep-
tions since some specimens have been found at
greater depths (i.e. about 180 m deep) (Wick-
stead, 1975) and in an anaerobic and sulfide-rich
environment caused by the decomposing body
of a whale at 229 m deep (Nishikawa, 2004),
which does not exclude the possibility that deep-
water species may be found in the future.

In contrast to adults, the embryonic and larval stages of amphioxus are planktonic. Thus, the amphioxus larvae can drift across oceans thanks to marine currents over a period of time that, depending on the species, can range from a couple of weeks to several months (Figure 3). The larvae are mainly found and distributed by coastal currents, although pelagic larvae have also been reported in places far away from the coast (Goldschmidt, 1905). The study of these larvae gave rise to the discussion of a different type of amphioxus, called Amphioxides, which were considered to be pelagic adults, although today there is a wide consensus on the larval nature of these individuals, which, however, have delayed their metamorphosis in a neotenic process (Bone, 1957).

The distribution of each amphioxus species
has been reviewed in *Poss and Boschung, 1996*.
This kind of information can also be accessed in
the Unesco database, OBIS (*McEwan, 2001*),
where it can be observed that amphioxus are
found in all tropical and temperate coasts of the
world. An interesting aspect of the differences
in distribution between species is that, while
some species have been found at very distant
locations around the globe, such as *B. belcheri*
that can be found in practically all coasts of East
Asia, Oceania and even the African coasts of the
Indian Ocean, and similarly *B. lanceolatum* that
is found along the entire Mediterranean coasts,
the Atlantic coasts of Europe and North Africa
(*Caccavale et al., 2021b*), and even in the Indian
Ocean, other species are found in much more
restricted areas. For example, *Branchiostoma
senegalensis* or *Branchiostoma gambiense* were
only described on the West Africa coasts. Several
explanations can account for this, but the most
widely accepted is that the amplitude of the
species distribution depend upon the type of
marine currents present in each area (*Webb,
1975*).

Habitat and lifestyle

Adult amphioxus, as already mentioned, live
on the seafloor, burrowed in well-ventilated

substrates with a soft texture and without too
much organic load. Different species have been
described as living in different types of substrate,
ranging from very fine sand, coarse sand and even
shell deposits, with a clear preference of most of
the species for coarse sand with low content of
fine particles. This is the case of *Branchiostoma
nigeriense* on the west coast of Africa (*Webb
and Hill, 1958; Webb, 1958), *Branchiostoma
caribaeum* in Mississippi Sound and from South
Carolina to Georgia (*Boschung and Gunter,
1962; Cory and Pierce, 1967), *B. senegalense*
in the off-shore shelf region off North West Africa
(*Gosselck and Spittler, 1979*) and *B. lanceo-
latum* from the Mediterranean coast of southern
France (*Caccavale et al., 2021b; Desdevises
et al., 2011*). However, *B. floridae* from Tampa
Bay in Florida seems to be an exception to this
rule since they live in fine sand bottoms (*Stokes
and Holland, 1996a; Stokes, 1996*).

All species of amphioxus are gonochoric, and
only a few cases of hermaphroditism have been
reported in both *B. lanceolatum* and *B. belcheri*
(Yamaguchi and Henmi, 2003; Orton, 1914).
In these cases, only a few female gonads (i.e.,
developing ovaries) were observed in a male (2–5
gonads out of a total of 45–50). A unique case
of complete sex reversal has been described in
*B. belcheri*, where a female amphioxus reared in
the laboratory was sexually reversed into a male
(Zhang et al., 2001).

Spawning, which consists in the release of
thousands of oocytes and millions of sperma-
tozoa in the water column, is concentrated,
in most species, in one period of the year (i.e.
the spawning season), which usually takes place
during the warmer months (spring-summer).
The spawning season duration varies between
species, being shorter (between one and three
months) in species living in temperate waters and
longer (around six months) in tropical species.
Spawning always occurs shortly after sunset,
although the behaviour is different depending
on the species. Thus, for example, in *B. floridae*,
up to 90% of the animals spawn synchronously
once every two or three weeks (*Stokes and
Holland, 1996b*). On the other hand, in other
species such as *B. lanceolatum*, spawning occurs
gradually between the beginning and the end of
the spawning season (*Fuentes et al., 2004*). An
exception to this unique annual breeding season
is the case of *A. lucayanum*, which spawn during
two periods of the year (during the warm months
of spring and summer, but also in autumn). More-
over, in this species, the moon cycle seems to
play a major role since spawning is concentrated
in the days preceding the new moon (Holland, 2011).

Concerning the feeding behaviour, the size of the particles filtered by different amphioxus species, as well as their diet, has been studied. Amphioxus are able to ingest sub-micron particles thanks to the mucus secreted by the endostyle. The size of these particles has been calculated in several species (i.e. *B. lanceolatum*, *B. senegalense*, *B. floridae*) and the results are quite similar regardless of the species. The size ranges from 0.062 to 100 µm, although in *B. senegalense* particles up to 300 µm were found (Gosselck et al., 1978; Ruppert et al., 2000; Riisgard and Svane, 1999). This particle size suggests that the amphioxus diet includes microbes as well as phytoplankton, even if, in addition to phytoplankton, crustaceans have also been found in the gut contents of *B. senegalense* and *B. lanceolatum* larvae (Gosselck and Kuehner, 1973; Webb, 1969). Moreover, much of the ingested material exits the anus undigested after 1-2 hours and most of the gut contents consist of detritus, suggesting that amphioxus are indiscriminate suspension feeders (Gosselck et al., 1978). A clear example of this indiscriminate filtering behaviour is the fact that several recent studies show how different species of amphioxus are capable of filtering microplastics present in the environment (Cheng et al., 2023; Xiang et al., 2022).

An interesting behaviour of adult amphioxus is that, as ciliary feeding progresses, the oral cirri, whose function is to prevent the entry of large particles, become blocked with these coarse detritus reducing the flow of water through the pharynx. When this occurs, the atrial floor is violently raised and lowered, and water is expelled from the atrium through the pharynx and oral hood, which unblocks the oral cirri (Dennell, 1950).

Several studies have focused on the lifespan of different amphioxus species, usually based on the size distribution of sampled individuals and taking into account that amphioxus grow continuously during their entire life (Stokes, 1996). These estimates include a lifespan of 2-3 years for *B. floridae* (Wells, 1926; Nelson, 1968; Futch and Dwinell, 1977), a maximum age of 2-3 years for *B. belcheri* (Chin, 1941; Chen et al., 2008), a lifespan of 4-5 years for *B. senegalense* in north-west Africa (Gosselck and Spittler, 1979), a lifespan of 5 years for *B. lanceolatum* in the Mediterranean Sea (Desdevises et al., 2011), which increases to 8 years in the relatively cold waters of Helgoland (Courtney, 1975).

The most likely causes of death in amphioxus, as in most wild animals, can be summarized as infections and predation. Thus, our own observations attest that amphioxus in the water column are attractive prey for fishes, and a description of amphioxus predators has been published. In this case, a stingray was observed to have a gut filled almost exclusively with amphioxus (*B. floridae*) in Tampa Bay (Stokes and Holland, 1992).

Concerning infections, in 1936 Ravitch-Stcherbo described the presence of a bacteria which produces a red pigment by putrid decomposition of tissues, and which is capable of infecting and killing amphioxus (*B. lanceolatum*) in captivity, but the strain of this bacterium was not described (Ravitch-Stcherbo, 1936). More recently, Zou and collaborators described the presence of a lethal bacteria and characterised it as Vibrio alginolyticus in *B. belcheri* (Zou et al., 2016). Finally, other causes of death like tumours, such as a chromaffinoma (Stolk, 1961), or the presence of parasites have also been described in amphioxus. Thus, in 1968 Azariah described the presence of a trypanorhynchan larvae, a cestode known to parasitize fishes, in several individuals of *B. lanceolatum* off the coast of Madras in India (Azariah, 1968), and Holland and collaborators also described the presence of parasitic larvae of the tapeworm *Acanthobothrium brevissime* in *B. floridae* (Holland et al., 2009).

## Technical advances in amphioxus research

In recent years, the worldwide growing interest in amphioxus as model organisms for different research studies has led various groups to develop new technical approaches to breed the animals in captivity. Thus, different tools and protocols have been developed for amphioxus maintenance and reproduction that allow obtaining large amounts of live embryos in the laboratory. These amphioxus aquaculture systems have been developed for the four most studied species, with slight differences concerning the day/night cycle, sea water recirculation, species-specific temperature regimes, natural or artificial seawater, the presence or not of sand in the tanks, and so forth (Fuentes et al., 2004; Fuentes et al., 2007; Holland and Yu, 2004; Yasui et al., 2007; Holland and Holland, 2010; Li et al., 2012; Li et al., 2013; Li et al., 2015; Theodosiou et al., 2011; Benito-Gutiérrez et al., 2013; Carvalho et al., 2017; Somorjai et al., 2008).

Adult amphioxus with mature gonads can be artificially induced to spawn in the laboratory
during the breeding season under controlled conditions. This is a prerequisite for the *in vitro* fertilization of eggs and the achievement of synchronized embryo's cultures. Different methodologies have proven effective for successful spawning induction depending on the species: the first of these was an electric shock in *B. floridae* (*Holland and Holland, 1989*), but this approach also induced unfertilised egg activation in other species, such as *B. lanceolatum*, so a different approach was required. A water temperature change 36 hours prior spawning is employed for species like *B. lanceolatum* (*Fuentes et al., 2004; Fuentes et al., 2007*). Gonad maturation is a prerequisite for spawning induction, but it is seasonally restricted to the breeding season and is often quite difficult to obtain in captive animals. Nevertheless, excellent results have been obtained using tropical species (*B. floridae* and *B. belcheri*) for which it has been possible to significantly increase the reproductive period artificially in the laboratory, beyond the limited breeding season (*Li et al., 2013; Holland and Li, 2021*).

Animal husbandry, therefore, allows obtaining large amounts of eggs and embryos on demand, opening the door to modern functional approaches to study developmental gene function and the molecular mechanisms of gene and genomic regulation. The first studies focusing on gene expression using amphioxus embryos were based on classical analyses through in situ hybridization in the 1990s (*Holland et al., 1992*). The first functional studies were carried out through the use of pharmacological treatments capable of activating, inhibiting or modifying certain signaling pathways (*Bertrand et al., 2017*). Other methods to manipulate gene expression through gene overexpression or gene knockdown by microinjection in the unfertilized eggs of mRNAs or morpholinos have also been developed in different amphioxus species (*Aldea et al., 2019; Onai et al., 2010; Schubert et al., 2005*).

Classical embryo micromanipulation techniques, including grafting, have also been developed (*Le Petillon et al., 2020*). Importantly, through the use of the TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing approaches, and Tol2-based transgenesis, it has been possible to obtain knock out and transgenic lines in *B. floridae* and *B. belcheri* for different genes, which has lifted an important brake on functional studies using amphioxus and has boosted the research in the evolutionary developmental biology field (EvoDevo) (*Holland and Li, 2021; Li et al., 2014; Li et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2017; Zhong et al., 2020; Ren et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020; Zou et al., 2021; Su et al., 2020; Kozmikova and Kozmik, 2015*).

Finally, high-throughput sequencing techniques have made it possible to obtain the complete chromosome-level genome assembly of four amphioxus species, *B. floridae*, *B. lanceolatum*, *B. belcheri* and *B. japonicum* (*Putnam et al., 2008; Marlétaz et al., 2018; Brasó-Vives et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2023; Huang et al., 2014*), thus opening the door to functional and comparative genomics studies. The use of new sequencing techniques at the level of single cells has been producing significant amount of information in recent years in various animal models. Amphioxus has not been left behind and this technique has also started to generate interesting results in several species (*Lin et al., 2020; Satoh et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2022*).

## Amphioxus as a model to understand chordate evolution

In this article we have focused mainly on known data on the biology and natural history of amphioxus. However, most of the recent scientific work published on amphioxus focuses on the evolution of developmental mechanisms and genomes. As we have presented in this review, because of their phylogenetic position among chordates, their prototypical characteristics, and the possibility of obtaining a large amount of externally developing and transparent embryos, amphioxus were mainly used to try to understand how the evolution of genomes and of the control of developmental processes led to the morphological complexity found in extant vertebrates.

Concerning genomics, obtaining whole genome sequences for amphioxus (*Putnam et al., 2008; Marlétaz et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2014*), and also for tunicates (*Dehal et al., 2002; Dehal and Boore, 2005*), allowed the 2R hypothesis proposed by *Ohno, 1970* to be confirmed. According to this hypothesis, two rounds of whole genome duplications took place during the early evolutionary history of vertebrates, although data in lamprey suggest that only one of these duplications might be shared by gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates) and cyclostomes (jawless vertebrates including lampreys and hagfish) (*Simakov et al., 2020*). Amphioxus genomic data also helped reconstructing the chordate ancestral karyotype, and the evolution of gene families in this clade. Finally, recent epigenomic analyses showed that chromatin conformation evolution (*Acemel et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2023*) and complexification of developmental gene
**Box 1. Outstanding questions about the natural history of amphioxus.**

# How much amphioxus diversity remains undiscovered? In other words, how many species are valid?

# What are the ecological factors that restrict the distribution of amphioxus species to specific places?

# What environmental, physiological and/or endocrine factors are responsible for the spawning induction in the wild?

# Why do certain species develop gonads in captivity in a simple way, while this process is extremely complicated in other species?

# What are the greatest threats to amphioxus conservation?

# What mechanisms allow morphological and anatomical conservation between different amphioxus species despite their high genetic polymorphism?

regulation (Marlétaz et al., 2018) and of the interconnectivity between signalling pathways (Gil-Gálvez et al., 2022) might have participated to the emergence of vertebrate specific traits.

Studies of amphioxus development, through the analysis of gene expression or function, and of the role of different intercellular communication pathways, led to several key advances in our understanding of morphological evolution within the chordate group. First, conservation of the expression of orthologous genes in homologous structures between amphioxus and vertebrates allowed highlighting the key actors controlling the formation of chordate synapomorphic traits. Hence it has been shown, for example, that both amphioxus and vertebrates possess an embryonic territory at the gastrula stage called the dorsal organizer, which is responsible for early axial patterning and for neural induction (Le Petillon et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2007).

On the other hand, studies in amphioxus also pointed out differences with vertebrate developmental modalities that could be linked to the emergence of vertebrate traits such as an unsegmented head musculature (Aldea et al., 2019; Bertrand et al., 2011; Meister et al., 2022). Lastly, embryological studies on amphioxus may also shed light on unsuspected roles of certain signals in the control of chordate development. For example, a recent work showed the role of the nitric oxide pathway in normal pharyngeal development through an interaction with the retinoic acid signaling pathway in amphioxus (Caccavale et al., 2021a), which calls for a more detailed examination of embryonic function of nitric oxide in vertebrates.

**Conclusions**

The interest in the study of cephalochordate biology and ecology has experienced alternating periods of great popularity and long periods of stagnation. Today, however, the number of research groups using amphioxus as a model organism is growing and they are located all over the world. Moreover, the interest in amphioxus covers a wide spectrum of research fields, ranging from classical embryology, through EvoDevo, to functional and comparative genomics (see **Box 1** for a list of outstanding questions about the natural history of amphioxus).

Unlike many other animal models, there is not a specific meeting for researchers interested in amphioxus, although the European Society for Evolutionary Developmental Biology (https://evodevo.eu) has sponsored a satellite meeting dedicated to amphioxus for the past decade. This meeting, which takes places every two years, is typically attended by almost one hundred participants.

Modern technological approaches are driving amphioxus research, and undoubtedly the technical developments we have discussed, and in particular the obtaining of the transcriptomic profile of each cell type, will help resolving old questions in the future. Examples of such questions include the evolutionary appearance of the neural crest cells typical of vertebrates, or the evolution and complexification of the vertebrate brain from that of the chordate ancestor. The multiplication of data produced by high-throughput sequencing techniques will also certainly raise new and interesting questions, as much on the evolutionary level as on
that of embryonic development or physiology of amphioxus.

Whatever the future of research using different species of amphioxus as model organisms, one point on which the entire scientific community agrees is that this is an extremely exciting time to be working with this fascinating little animal.

### Acknowledgements

The authors thank present and past members of the Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn (SZN) and Observatoire Océanologique, Banyuls-sur-Mer (OOB) for their enthusiasm and work on several amphioxus research projects. The authors also thank the reviewers for helping to improve the manuscript.

**Salvatore D'Aniello** is in Biology and Evolution of Marine Organisms (BEOM), Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy
salvatore.daniello@szn.it

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7294-1465

**Stephanie Bertrand** is at Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Biologie Intégrative des Organismes Marins (BIOM), Observatoire Océanologique, Banyuls-sur-Mer, France
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0689-0126

**Hector Escriva** is at Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Biologie Intégrative des Organismes Marins (BIOM), Observatoire Océanologique, Banyuls-sur-Mer, France
hector.escriva@obs-banyuls.fr

**Author contributions:** Salvatore D'Aniello, Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing; Stephanie Bertrand, Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – review and editing; Hector Escriva, Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

**Competing interests:** The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Received 20 February 2023

Accepted 10 August 2023

Published 18 September 2023

### Funding

<table><thead><tr><td>Funder</td><td>Grant reference number</td><td>Author</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Agence Nationale de la Recherche</td><td>ANR-19-CE13-0011</td><td>Stephanie Bertrand Hector Escriva</td></tr><tr><td>Agence Nationale de la Recherche</td><td>ANR-21-CE13-0034</td><td>Stephanie Bertrand Hector Escriva</td></tr><tr><td>Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn</td><td></td><td>Salvatore D'Aniello</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><td>Funder</td><td>Grant reference number</td><td>Author</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3">The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Decision letter and Author response

Decision letter https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87028.sa1
Author response https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87028.sa2

### Data availability

No new data was generated for this article.

### References

**Abitua PB**, Gainous TB, Kaczmarczyk AN, Winchell CJ, Hudson C, Kamata K, Nakagawa M, Tsuda M, Kusakabe TG, Levine M. 2015. The pre-vertebrate origins of neurogenic placodes. *Nature* **524**:462–465.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14657, PMID: 26258298

**Acemel RD**, Tena JJ, Irastorza-Azcarate I, Marlétaz F, Gómez-Marín C, de la Calle-Mustienes E, Bertrand S, Diaz SG, Aldea D, Aury J-M, Mangenot S, Holland PWH, Devos DP, Maeso I, Escrivá H, Gómez-Skarmeta JL. 2016. A single three-dimensional chromatin compartment in amphioxus indicates a stepwise evolution of vertebrate Hox bimodal regulation. *Nature Genetics* **48**:336–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3497

**Aldea D**, Subirana L, Keime C, Meister L, Maeso I, Marcellini S, Gomez-Skarmeta JL, Bertrand S, Escriva H. 2019. Genetic regulation of amphioxus somitogenesis informs the evolution of the vertebrate head mesoderm. *Nature Ecology & Evolution* **3**:1233–1240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0933-z, PMID: 31263232

**Andrews EA.** 1893 An undescribed acraniate: *Asymmetron Lucayanum*. Martin HN, Brooks WK (Eds). *Studies from the Biological Laboratory* Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press. p. 213–247.

**Azariah J.** 1968. Occurrence of a trypanorhynchan larva in amphioxus (*Branchiostoma lanceolatum*).
*Current Science* **37**:439–440.

**Benito-Gutiérrez È**, Weber H, Bryant DV, Arendt D, Escriva H. 2013. Methods for generating year-round access to amphioxus in the laboratory. *PLOS ONE* **8**:e71599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071599

**Bertrand S**, Camasses A, Somorjai I, Belgacem MR, Chabrol O, Escande ML, Pontarotti P, Escriva H. 2011. Amphioxus FGF signaling predicts the acquisition of vertebrate morphological traits. *PNAS* **108**:9160–9165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014235108, PMID: 21571634

**Bertrand S**, Escriva H. 2011. Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: amphioxus. *Development* **138**:4819–4830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.066720, PMID: 22028023

**Bertrand S**, Le Petillon Y, Somorjai IML, Escriva H. 2017. Developmental cell-cell communication pathways in the cephalochordate amphioxus: actors and functions. *The International Journal of Developmental Biology* **61**:697–722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.170202sb, PMID: 29319118
Bertrand S, Carvalho JE, Dauga D, Matentzoglu N, Daric V, Yu JK, Schubert M, Escrivá H. 2021. The ontology of the amphioxus anatomy and life cycle. *Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology* **9**:668025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.668025, PMID: 33981708

Bone Q. 1957. The problem of the 'amphioxides' larva. *Nature* **180**:1462-1464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1801462a0, PMID: 13483601

Boschung H, Gunter G. 1962. Distribution and variation of *Branchiostoma caribaeum* in Mississippi Sound. *Tulane Studies of Zoology* **9**:245-247.

Bourlat SJ, Juliusdottir T, Lowe CJ, Freeman R, Aronowicz J, Kirschner M, Lander ES, Thorndyke M, Nakano H, Kohn AB, Heyland A, Moroz LL, Copley RR, Telford MJ. 2006. Deuterostome phylogeny reveals monophyletic chordates and the new phylum *Xenoturbellida*. *Nature* **444**:85-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05241, PMID: 17051155

Brasó-Vives M, Marlétaz F, Echchiki A, Mantica F, Acemel RD, Gómez-Skarmeta JL, Hartasánchez DA, Le Targa L, Pontarotti P, Tena JJ, Maeso I, Escriva H, Irimia M, Robinson-Rechavi M. 2022. Parallel evolution of amphioxus and vertebrate small-scale gene duplications. *Genome Biology* **23**:243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-022-02808-6

Caccavale F, Annona G, Subirana L, Escriva H, Bertrand S, D'Aniello S. 2021a. Crosstalk between nitric oxide and retinoic acid pathways is essential for amphioxus pharynx development. *eLife* **10**:e58295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58295, PMID: 34431784

Caccavale F, Osca D, D'Aniello S, Crocetta F. 2021b. Molecular taxonomy confirms that the northeastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea harbor a single lancelet, *Branchiostoma lanceolatum* (Pallas, 1774) (Cephalochordata: Leptocardii: Branchiostomatidae). *PLOS ONE* **16**:e0251358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251358, PMID: 33956890

Carvalho JE, Lahaye F, Schubert M. 2017. Keeping amphioxus in the laboratory: an update on available husbandry methods. *The International Journal of Developmental Biology* **61**:773-783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.170192ms

Carvalho JE, Lahaye F, Yong LW, Croce JC, Escrivá H, Yu J-K, Schubert M. 2021. An updated staging system for cephalochordate development: One table suits them all. *Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology* **9**:668006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.668006, PMID: 34095136

Chen Y, Shin PKS, Cheung SG. 2008. Growth, secondary production and gonad development of two co-existing amphioxus species (*Branchiostoma belcheri* and *B. malayanum*) in subtropical Hong Kong. *Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology* **357**:64-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.12.028

Cheng J, Meistertzheim A-L, Leistenschneider D, Philip L, Jacquin J, Escande M-L, Barbe V, Ter Halle A, Chapron L, Lartaud F, Bertrand S, Escriva H, Ghiglione J-F. 2023. Impacts of microplastics and the associated plastisphere on physiological, biochemical, genetic expression and gut microbiota of the filter-feeder amphioxus. *Environment International* **172**:107750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.107750, PMID: 36669287

Chin T. 1941. Studies on the biology of the Amoy amphioxus *Branchiostoma belcheri Gray*. The Philip J Sci **75**:369-424.

Cory RL, Pierce EL. 1967. Distribution and ecology of lancelets (order amphioxi) over the continental shelf of the southeastern United States. *Limnology and Oceanography* **12**:650-656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1967.12.4.0650

Costa OG. 1834. Cenni Zoologici, Ossia Descrizione Somaria delle specie Nuove Di Animali Discoperti in diverse Contrade del Regno Nell'Anno 1834. Costa OG (Ed). *Annuario Zoologico Napoli*: Tipografia di Azzolino e Comp. p. 49-50.

Courtney WAM. 1975. The temperature relationships and age-structure of North Sea and Mediterranean populations of *Branchiostoma lanceolatum*. *Symp. Zool. Soc. London* **36**:213-233.

Dehal P, Satou Y, Campbell RK, Chapman J, Degnan B, De Tomaso A, Davidson B, Di Gregorio A, Gelpke M, Goodstein DM, Harafuji N, Hastings KEM, Ho I, Hotta K, Huang W, Kawashima T, Lemaire P, Martinez D, Meinertzhagen IA, Necula S, et al. 2002. The draft genome of *Ciona intestinalis*: insights into chordate and vertebrate origins. *Science* **298**:2157-2167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1080049, PMID: 12481130

Dehal P., Boore JL. 2005. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. *PLOS Biology* **3:e314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030314, PMID: 16128622

Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Chourrout D, Philippe H. 2006. Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. *Nature* **439**:965-968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04336, PMID: 16495997

Delsuc F, Tsagkogeorga G, Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2008. Additional molecular support for the new chordate phylogeny. *Genesis* **46**:592-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20450, PMID: 19003928

Dennell R. 1950. Note on the feeding of Amphioxus (*Branchiostoma bermudae*). *Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb* **64**:229-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080455X00000345

Desdevise s Y, Maillet V, Fuentes M, Escriva H. 2011. A snapshot of the population structure of *Branchiostoma lanceolatum* in the Racou Beach, France, during its spawning season. *PLOS ONE* **6**:e18520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018520, PMID: 21525973

Fuentes M, Schubert M, Dalfo D, Candiani S, Benito E, Gardenyes J, Godoy L, Moret F, Illas M, Patten I, Permanyer J, Oliveri D, Boeuf G, Falcon J, Pestarino M, Fernandez JG, Albalat R, Laudet V, Vernier P, Escriva H. 2004. Preliminary observations on the spawning conditions of the European amphioxus (*Branchiostoma lanceolatum*) in captivity. *Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution* **302**:384-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.20025, PMID: 15287102

Fuentes M, Benito E, Bertrand S, Paris M, Mignardot A, Godoy L, Jimenez-Delgado S, Oliveri D, Candiani S, Hirsinger E, D'Aniello S, Pascual-Anaya J, Maeso I, Pestarino M, Vernier P, Nicolas J-F, Schubert M, Laudet V, Geneviere AM, Albalat R, et al. 2007. Insights into spawning behavior and development of the European amphioxus (*Branchiostoma lanceolatum*). *Journal of Experimental
Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution **308**:484–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21179, PMID: 17520703

Futch CR, Dwinell SE. 1977. Nearshore marine ecology at Hutchinson Island, Florida: 1971–1974: IV. Lancelets and fishes. *Florida Marine Research Publications* **24**:1–23.

Gil-Gálvez A, Jiménez-Gancedo S, Pérez-Posada A, Franke M, Acemel RD, Lin CY, Chou C, Su YH, Yu JK, Bertrand S, Schubert M, Escrivá H, Tena JJ, Gómez-Skarmeta JL. 2022. Gain of gene regulatory network interconnectivity at the origin of vertebrates. *PNAS* **119**:e2114802119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114802119, PMID: 35263228

Goldschmidt R. 1905. Amphioxides. Wiss. Ergebn. Der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition, 'Valdivia' Biodiversity Library.

Gosselck F, Kuehner E. 1973. Investigations on the biology of *Branchiostoma senegalense* larvae off the northwest African coast. *Marine Biology* **22**:67–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388911

Gosselck F, Kell V, Spittler P. 1978. On the feeding of *Branchiostoma senegalense* (Acrania: Branchiostomidae). *Marine Biology* **46**:175–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391534

Gosselck F, Spittler P. 1979. Age structure, growth, and weight of *Branchiostoma senegalense* (acrania, branchiostomidae) off north-west Africa. *Internationale Revue Der Gesamten Hydrobiologie Und Hydrographie* **64**:541–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.19790640418

Gray JE. 1847. Description of a new species of amphioxus from Borneo. *Annals and Magazine of Natural History* **19**:463–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/037454809495995

Günther A, Reptilia B. 1882. Pisces in Report on the Zoological Collections Made in the Indo-Pacific Ocean during the Voyage of HMS Alert 1881–1882 London: British Museum.

Haeckel E. 1866. *Generelle Morphologie Der Organismen* Berlin: Reimer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110848281

Holland ND, Holland LZ. 1989. Fine Structural Study of the Cortical Reaction and Formation of the Egg Coats in a Lancelet (= Amphioxus), *Branchiostoma floridae* (Phylum Chordata: Subphylum Cephalochordata = Acrania). *The Biological Bulletin* **176**:111–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1541578

Holland PW, Holland LZ, Williams NA, Holland ND. 1992. An amphioxus homeobox gene: sequence conservation, spatial expression during development and insights into vertebrate evolution. *Development* **116**:653–661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.116.3.653, PMID: 1363226

Holland LZ, Yu JK. 2004. Cephalochordate (amphioxus) embryos: procurement, culture, and basic methods. *Methods in Cell Biology* **74**:195–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0091-679x(04)74009-1, PMID: 15575608

Holland ND, Campbell TG, Garey JR, Holland LZ, Wilson NG. 2009. The Florida amphioxus (Cephalochordata) hosts larvae of the tapeworm *Acanthobothrium brevissime*: natural history, anatomy and taxonomic identification of the parasite. *Acta Zoologica* **90**:75–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.2008.00343.x

Holland ND, Holland LZ. 2010. Laboratory spawning and development of the Bahama lancelet, *Asymmetron lucayanum* (cephalochordata): fertilization through feeding larvae. *The Biological Bulletin* **219**:132–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/BBLv219n2p132, PMID: 20972258

Holland ND. 2011. Spawning periodicity of the lancelet, *Asymmetron lucayanum* (Cephalochordata), in Bimini, Bahamas. *Italian Journal of Zoology* **78**:478–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11250003.2011.594097

Holland LZ, Li G. 2021. Laboratory culture and mutagenesis of Amphioxus (*Branchiostoma Floridae*). Carroll DJ, Stricker SA (Eds). *Developmental Biology of the Sea Urchin and Other Marine Invertebrates: Methods and Protocols* New York, NY: Humana Press. p. 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0974-3

Horie R, Hazbun A, Chen K, Cao C, Levine M, Horie T. 2018. Shared evolutionary origin of vertebrate neural crest and cranial placodes. *Nature* **560**:228–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0385-7, PMID: 30069052

Hu G, Li G, Wang H, Wang Y. 2017. Hedgehog participates in the establishment of left-right asymmetry during amphioxus development by controlling *Cerberus* expression. *Development* **144**:4694–4703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.157172, PMID: 29122841

Huang S, Chen Z, Yan X, Yu T, Huang G, Yan Q, Pontarotti PA, Zhao H, Li J, Yang P, Wang R, Li R, Tao X, Deng T, Wang Y, Li G, Zhang Q, Zhou S, You L, Yuan S, et al. 2014. Decelerated genome evolution in modern vertebrates revealed by analysis of multiple lancelet genomes. *Nature Communications* **5**:5896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6896

Huang Z, Xu L, Cai C, Zhou Y, Liu J, Xu Z, Zhu Z, Kang W, Cen W, Pei S, Chen D, Shi C, Wu X, Huang Y, Xu C, Yan Y, Yang Y, Xue T, He W, Hu X, et al. 2023. Three amphioxus reference genomes reveal gene and chromosome evolution of chordates. *PNAS* **120**:e2201504120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201504120, PMID: 36867684

Igawa T, Nozawa M, Suzuki DG, Reimer JD, Morov AR, Wang Y, Henmi Y, Yasui K. 2017. Evolutionary history of the extant amphioxus lineage with shallow-branching diversification. *Scientific Reports* **7**:1157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00786-5, PMID: 28442709

Kon T, Nohara M, Nishida M, Sterrer W, Nishikawa T. 2006. Hidden ancient diversification in the circumtropical lancelet *Asymmetron lucayanum* complex. *Marine Biology* **149**:875–883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0271-y

Kozmikova I, Kozmik Z. 2015. Gene regulation in amphioxus: An insight from transgenic studies in amphioxus and vertebrates. *Marine Genomics* **24 Pt 2**:159–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margen.2015.06.003, PMID: 26094865

Le Petillon Y, Luxardi G, Scerbo P, Cibois M, Leon A, Subirana I, Lrimia M, Kodjabachian L, Escrivá H, Bertrand S. 2017. Nodal/activin pathway is a conserved neural induction signal in chordates. *Nature Ecology & Evolution* **1**:1192–1200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0226-3, PMID: 28782045

Le Petillon Y, Bertrand S, Escrivà H. 2020. Spawning induction and embryo micromanipulation protocols in
the Amphioxus *Branchiostoma lanceolatum*. Methods in Molecular Biology **2047**:347–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9732-9_19, PMID: 31552664

Li G, Yang X, Shu Z, Chen X, Wang Y. 2012. Consecutive spawnings of Chinese amphioxus, *Branchiostoma belcheri*, in captivity. PLOS ONE **7**:e50838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050838, PMID: 23251392

Li G., Shu Z, Wang Y. 2013. Year-round reproduction and induced spawning of Chinese amphioxus, *Branchiostoma belcheri*, in laboratory. PLOS ONE **8**:e75461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075461, PMID: 24086537

Li G, Feng J, Lei Y, Wang J, Wang H, Shang L-K, Liu D-T, Zhao H, Zhu Y, Wang Y-Q. 2014. Mutagenesis at specific genomic loci of amphioxus *Branchiostoma belcheri* using TALEN method. Journal of Genetics and Genomics **41**:215–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2014.02.003, PMID: 24780619

Li G, Wang J, Yuan L, Wang H, Wang Y-Q. 2015. A simple method for selecting spawning-ready individuals out from laboratorial cultured amphioxus population. Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution **324**:629–635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22640, PMID: 26299898

Li G, Liu X, Xing C, Zhang H, Shimeld SM, Wang Y. 2017. Cerberus-Nodal-Lefty-Pitx signaling cascade controls left-right asymmetry in amphioxus. PNAS **114**:3684–3689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620519114, PMID: 28320954

Lin C-Y, Lu M-YJ, Yue J-X, Li K-L, Le Pétillon Y, Yong LW, Chen Y-H, Tsai F-Y, Lyu Y-F, Chen C-Y, Hwang S-PL, Su Y-H, Yu J-K, Mullins MC. 2020. Molecular asymmetry in the cephalochordate embryo revealed by single-blastomere transcriptome profiling. PLOS Genetics **16**:e1009294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009294

Ma P, Liu X, Xu Z, Liu H, Ding X, Huang Z, Shi C, Liang L, Xu L, Li X, Li G, He Y, Ding Z, Chai C, Wang H, Qiu J, Zhu J, Wang X, Ding P, Zhou S, et al. 2022. Joint profiling of gene expression and chromatin accessibility during amphioxus development at single-cell resolution. Cell Reports **39**:110979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110979

Mallatt J, Chen J. 2003. Fossil sister group of craniates: predicted and found. Journal of Morphology **258**:1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10081, PMID: 12905532

Mallatt J, Holland N. 2013. Pikaia gracilens Walcott: stem chordate, or already specialized in the Cambrian? Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution **320**:247–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22500, PMID: 23606659

Manni L, Lane NJ, Joly JS, Gasparini F, Tiozzo S, Caicci F, Zaniolo G, Burighel P. 2004. Neurogenic and non-neurogenic placodes in ascidians. Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution **302**:483–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21013, PMID: 15384166

Marlétaz F, Firbas PN, Maeso I, Tena JJ, Bogdanovic O, Perry M, Wyatt CDR, de la Calle-Mustienes E, Bertrand S, Burguera D, Acemel RD, van Heeringen SJ, Naranjo S, Herrera-Ubeda C, Skvortsova K, Jimenez-Gancedo S, Aldea D, Marquez Y, Buono L, Kozmikova I, et al. 2018. Amphioxus functional genomics and the origins of

vertebrate gene regulation. Nature **564**:64–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0734-6, PMID: 30464347

McEwan IJ. 2001. Bakers yeast rises to the challenge: reconstitution of mammalian steroid receptor signalling in S. cerevisiae. Trends in Genetics **17**:239–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02273-9, PMID: 11335020

Meister L, Escriva H, Bertrand S. 2022. Functions of the FGF signalling pathway in cephalochordates provide insight into the evolution of the prechordal plate. Development **149**:dev200252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200252, PMID: 35575387

Morris SC, Caron JB. 2012. Pikaia gracilens Walcott, a stem-group chordate from the Middle Cambrian of British Columbia. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society **87**:480–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00220.x, PMID: 22385518

Nelson GE. 1968. Amphioxus in old Tampa Bay, Florida. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences **31**:93–100.

Nishikawa T. 2004. A new deep-water lancelet (Cephalochordata) from off Cape Nomamisaki, SW Japan, with a proposal of the revised system recovering the genus Asymmetron. Zoological Science **21**:1131–1136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.21.1131, PMID: 15572865

Nohara M, Nishida M, Miya M, Nishikawa T. 2005. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome in cephalochordata as inferred from complete nucleotide sequences from two Epigonichthys species. Journal of Molecular Evolution **60**:526–537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-004-0238-x, PMID: 15883887

Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by Gene Duplication Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3

Onai T, Yu J-K, Blitz IL, Cho KWY, Holland LZ. 2010. Opposing Nodal/Vg1 and BMP signals mediate axial patterning in embryos of the basal chordate amphioxus. Developmental Biology **344**:377–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.05.016, PMID: 20488174

Orton JH. 1914. On a hermaphrodite specimen of Amphioxus with notes on experiments in rearing amphioxus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom **10**:506–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400008262

Pallas PS, Richmond CW, Tucker MB. 1774. Spicilegia Zoologica: Quibus Novae Imprimis et Obscurae Animalium Species Iconibus, Descriptionibus Atque Commentariis Illustrantur. Fasciculus Decimus Lange: Berolini. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl title.39832

Paris M, Escriva H, Schubert M, Brunet F, Brtko J, Ciesielski F, Roecklin D, Vivat-Hannah V, Jamin EL, Cravedi J-P, Scanlan TS, Renaud J-P, Holland ND, Laudet V. 2008. Amphioxus postembryonic development reveals the homology of chordate metamorphosis. Current Biology **18**:825–830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.078, PMID: 18514519

Peters WCH. 1876. Über Epigonichthys cultellus eine neue Gattung und Art der Leptocardii. Ber. Akad. Wiss. Berlin **1875**:322–326.

Piyakarnchana T, Vajropala K. 1961. Some ecological factors that limit the distribution of three species of
lancelets in the Gulf of Thailand. *J. Nat. Res. Council Thailand* **2**:1–6.

**Poss SG**, Boschung HT. 1996. Lancelets (Cephalochordata: Branchiostomatidae): How many species are valid. *Israel J Zool* **42**:S13–S66.

**Putnam NH**, Butts T, Ferrier DEK, Furlong RF, Hellsten U, Kawashima T, Robinson-Rechavi M, Shoguchi E, Terry A, Yu J-K, Benito-Gutiérrez E, Dubchak I, Garcia-Fernández J, Gibson-Brown JJ, Grigoriev IV, Horton AC, de Jong PJ, Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Kohara Y, et al. 2008. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. *Nature* **453**:1064–1071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06967

**Ravitch-Stcherbo** J. 1936. De l'origine bactérienne du pigment rouge de l'Amphioxus lanceolatum, cause de sa mort et destruction Trudy Sevastopol Biol Stan Akad Nauk SSSR. SSSR. 287-296.

**Ren Q**, Zhong Y, Huang X, Leung B, Xing C, Wang H, Hu G, Wang Y, Shimeld SM, Li G. 2020. Step-wise evolution of neural patterning by Hedgehog signalling in chordates. *Nature Ecology & Evolution* **4**:1247–1255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1248-9, PMID: 32661406

**Richardson BJ**, McKenzie AM. 1994. Taxonomy and distribution of Australian Cephalochordates (Chordata : Cephalochordata). *Invertebrate Systematics* **8**:1443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/IT9941443

**Riisgard HU**, Svane I. 1999. Filter feeding in lancelets (amphioxus), *Branchiostoma lanceolatum*. *Invertebrate Biology* **118**:423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3227011

**Ruppert EE**, Nash TR, Smith AJ. 2000. The size range of suspended particles trapped and ingested by the filter-feeding lancelet *Branchiostoma floridae* (Cephalochordata: Acrania). *Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom* **80**:329–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315499001903

**Satoh N**, Tominaga H, Kiyomoto M, Hisata K, Inoue J, Nishitsuji K. 2021. A preliminary single-cell RNA-seq analysis of embryonic cells that express *Brachyury* in the Amphioxus, *Branchiostoma japonicum*. *Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology* **9**:696875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.696875, PMID: 34336847

**Schubert M**, Yu J-K, Holland ND, Escriva H, Laudet V, Holland LZ. 2005. Retinoic acid signaling acts via Hox1 to establish the posterior limit of the pharynx in the chordate amphioxus. *Development* **132**:61–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01554, PMID: 15576409

**Shu D-G**, Morris SC, Han J, Zhang Z-F, Yasui K, Janvier P, Chen L, Zhang X-L, Liu J-N, Li Y, Liu H-Q. 2003a. Head and backbone of the Early Cambrian vertebrate Haikouichthys. *Nature* **421**:526–529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01264, PMID: 12556891

**Shu D**, Morris SC, Zhang ZF, Liu JN, Han J, Chen L, Zhang XL, Yasui K, Li Y. 2003b. A new species of yunnanozoan with implications for deuterostome evolution. *Science* **299**:1380–1384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079846, PMID: 12610301

**Simakov O**, Marlétaz F, Yue J-X, O'Connell B, Jenkins J, Brandt A, Calef R, Tung C-H, Huang T-K, Schmutz J, Satoh N, Yu J-K, Putnam NH, Green RE, Rokhsar DS. 2020. Deeply conserved synteny resolves early events in vertebrate evolution. *Nature Ecology &

Evolution **4**:820–830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1156-z

**Somorjai IML**, Camasses A, Rivière B, Escrivà H. 2008. Development of a semi-closed aquaculture system for monitoring of individual amphioxus (*Branchiostoma lanceolatum*), with high survivorship. *Aquaculture* **281**:145–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.05.023

**Stokes MD**, Holland ND. 1992. Southern stingray (*Dasyatis americana*) feeding on lancelets (*Branchiostoma floridae*). *Journal of Fish Biology* **41**:1043–1044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1992.tb02732.x

**Stokes MD.** 1996. Larval settlement, post-settlement growth and secondary production of the Florida lancelet (= amphioxus) *Branchiostoma floridae*. *Marine Ecology Progress Series* **130**:71–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps130071

**Stokes MD**, Holland ND. 1996a. Life-history characteristics of the Florida lancelet, *Branchiostoma floridae*: some factors affecting population dynamics in Tampa Bay. *Israel Journal of Zoology* **42**:67–86.

**Stokes MD**, Holland ND. 1996b. Reproduction of the Florida lancelet (*Branchiostoma floridae*): Spawning patterns and fluctuations in gonad indexes and nutritional reserves. *Invertebrate Biology* **115**:349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3227024

**Stolk A.** 1961. Two types of ribonucleoprotein in the nucleolus of intestinal carcinoma of the newt following injection of herring-sperm deoxyribonucleic acid. *Nature* **192**:1215–1216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1921215a0, PMID: 14039539

**Su L**, Shi C, Huang X, Wang Y, Li G. 2020. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease in Amphioxus genome editing. *Genes* **11**:1311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111311, PMID: 33167309

**Subirana L**, Farstey V, Bertrand S, Escriva H. 2020. Asymmetron lucayanum: How many species are valid? *PLOS ONE* **15**:e0229119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229119, PMID: 32130230

**Sundevall C.** 1852. Ny art af Amphioxus. Öfversigt Af Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens Forhandlinger **9**:147–148.

**Sundevall C J.** 1853. Ny art af Branchiostoma (Amphioxus caribaeum). Öfversigt Af Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens Forhandlinger **10**:11–13.

**Theodosiou M**, Colin A, Schulz J, Laudet V, Peyrieras N, Nicolas J-F, Schubert M, Hirsinger E. 2011. Amphioxus spawning behavior in an artificial seawater facility. *Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution* **316**:263–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21397, PMID: 21271675

**Wang Y.** 2004. Taxonomic status of amphioxus *Branchiostoma belcheri* in Xiamen Beach estimated by homologous sequence of Cyt b gene. *Acta Zool Sinica* **50**:60–66.

**Webb JE.** 1958. The ecology of Lagos Lagoon V. Some physical properties of lagoon deposits. *Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences* **241**:393–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1958.0009

**Webb JE**, Hill MB. 1958. The ecology of Lagos lagoon. IV. On the reactions of *Branchiostoma nigeriense*. Webb to its environment. *Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological
Sciences **241**:355-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1958.0008

Webb JE. 1969. On the feeding and behaviour of the larva of *Branchiostoma lanceolatum*. *Marine Biology* **3**:58-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355593

Webb JE. 1975. The distribution of amphioxus. *Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond* **36**:179-212.

Wells MM. 1926. Collecting amphioxus. *Science* **64**:187-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.64.1651.187, PMID: 17730864

Wickstead J. 1975. Chordata: Acrania (Cephalochordata). Giese AC, Pearse JS (Eds). *Reproduction of Marine Invetebrates. Vol. II. Entoprocta and Lesser Coelomates* New York: Academic Press. p. 283-319.

Williams JB. 1996. Sessile lifestyle and origin of chordates. *New Zealand Journal of Zoology* **23**:111-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1996.9518072

Winchell CJ, Sullivan J, Cameron CB, Swalla BJ, Mallatt J. 2002. Evaluating hypotheses of deuterostome phylogeny and chordate evolution with new LSU and SSU ribosomal DNA data. *Molecular Biology and Evolution* **19**:762-776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004134, PMID: 11961109

Xiang K, He Z, Fu J, Wang G, Li H, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Chen L. 2022. Microplastics exposure as an emerging threat to ancient lineage: A contaminant of concern for abnormal bending of amphioxus via neurotoxicity. *Journal of Hazardous Materials* **438**:129454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129454, PMID: 35803186

Xu QS, Ma F, Wang YQ. 2005. Morphological and 12S rRNA gene comparison of two Branchiostoma species in Xiamen waters. *Journal of Experimental Zoology*. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution **304**:259-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21036, PMID: 15791653

Yamaguchi T, Henmi Y. 2003. Biology of the amphioxus, *Branchiostoma belcheri* in the Ariake Sea, Japan. II. Reproduction. *Zoological Science* **20**:907-918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2108/ztj.20.907, PMID: 12867721

Yarrell W. 1836. *A History of British Fishes* London: John van Voors.

Yasui K, Urata M, Yamaguchi N, Ueda H, Henmi Y. 2007. Laboratory culture of the Oriental lancelet *Branchiostoma belcheri*. *Zoological Science* **24**:514-520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2108/ztj.24.514, PMID: 17867851

Yu J-K, Satou Y, Holland ND, Shin-I T, Kohara Y, Satoh N, Bronner-Fraser M, Holland LZ. 2007. Axial patterning in cephalochordates and the evolution of the organizer. *Nature* **445**:613-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05472, PMID: 17237766

Zhang S, Li G, Zhu J, Su F. 2001. Sex reversal of the female amphioxus *Branchiostoma belcheri* tsingtauense reared in the laboratory. *Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom* **81**:181-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315401003599

Zhang Q-J, Zhong J, Fang S-H, Wang Y-Q. 2006. *Branchiostoma japonicum* and *B. belcheri* are distinct lancelets (Cephalochordata) in Xiamen waters in China. *Zoological Science* **23**:573-579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2108/ztj.23.573, PMID: 16849846

Zhong Y, Herrera-Übeda C, Garcia-Fernández J, Li G, Holland PWH. 2020. Mutation of amphioxus Pdx and Cdx demonstrates conserved roles for ParaHox genes in gut, anus and tail patterning. *BMC Biology* **18**:68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00796-2, PMID: 32546156

Zhu X, Shi C, Zhong Y, Liu X, Yan Q, Wu X, Wang Y, Li G. 2020. Cilia-driven asymmetric Hedgehog signalling determines the amphioxus left-right axis by controlling *Dand5* expression. *Development* **147**:dev182469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.182469, PMID: 31826864

Zou Y, Ma C, Zhang Y, Du Z, You F, Tan X, Zhang P-J. 2016. Isolation and characterization of Vibrio alginolyticus from cultured amphioxus *Branchiostoma belcheri* tsingtauense. *Biologia* **71**:757-762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0102

Zou J, Wu X, Shi C, Zhong Y, Zhang L, Yan Q, Su L, Li G. 2021. A potential method for rapid screening of amphioxus founder harboring germline mutation and transgene. *Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology* **9**:702290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.702290, PMID: 34458263