[12] J. Rossmanith, An unstaggered, high-resolution constrained transport method for magnetohydrodynamic flows, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28 (2006) 1766-1797, https://doi.org/10.1137/050627022.

[13] G. Tóth, D.L. De Zeeuw, T.I. Gombosi, K.G. Powell, A parallel explicit/implicit time stepping scheme on block-adaptive grids, J. Comput. Phys. 217 (2) (2006) 722-758, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2006.01.029.

[14] D. Lee, A.E. Deane, An unsplit staggered mesh scheme for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (4) (2009) 952-975, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2008.08.026.

[15] A. Mignone, P. Tzeferacos, G. Bodo, High-order conservative finite difference GLM-MHD schemes for cell-centered MHD, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (17) (2010) 5896-5920, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.04.013, arXiv:1001.2832.

[16] C.D. Meyer, D.S. Balsara, T.D. Aslam, A second-order accurate Super TimeStepping formulation for anisotropic thermal conduction, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 422 (3) (2012) 2102-2115, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20744.x.

[17] A. Mignone, M. Flock, M. Stute, S.M. Kolb, G. Muscianisi, A conservative orbital advection scheme for simulations of magnetized shear flows with the PLUTO code, Astron. Astrophys. 545 (2012) A152, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219557, arXiv:1207.2955.

[18] A. Mignone, L. Del Zanna, Systematic construction of upwind constrained transport schemes for MHD, J. Comput. Phys. 424 (2021) 109748, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109748, arXiv:2004.10542.

[19] P. Londrillo, L. Del Zanna, High-order upwind schemes for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamics, Astrophys. J. 530 (1) (2000) 508-524, https://doi.org/10.1086/308344, arXiv:astro-ph/9910086.

[20] L. Del Zanna, O. Zanotti, N. Bucciantini, P. Londrillo, ECHO: a Eulerian conservative high-order scheme for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics and magnetodynamics, Astron. Astrophys. 473 (2007) 11-30, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077093, arXiv:0704.3206.

[21] A.J. Christlieb, J.A. Rossmanith, Q. Tang, Finite difference weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with constrained transport for ideal magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 268 (2014) 302-325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03.001, arXiv:1309.3344.

[22] Y. Chen, G. Tóth, T.I. Gombosi, A fifth-order finite difference scheme for hyperbolic equations on block-adaptive curvilinear grids, J. Comput. Phys. 305 (2016) 604-621, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.11.003.

[23] T. Minoshima, T. Miyoshi, Y. Matsumoto, A high-order weighted finite difference scheme with a multistate approximate Riemann solver for divergence-free magnetohydrodynamic simulations, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 242 (2) (2019) 14, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab1a36, arXiv:1903.04759.

[24] A. Reyes, D. Lee, C. Graziani, P. Tzeferacos, A variable high-order shock-capturing finite difference method with GP-WENO, J. Comput. Phys. 381 (2019) 189-217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.12.028, arXiv:1808.04960.

[25] C.-W. Shu, High order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems, SIAM Rev. 51 (1) (2009) 82-126, https://doi.org/10.1137/070679065.

[26] D.S. Balsara, Divergence-free reconstruction of magnetic fields and WENO schemes for magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (14) (2009) 5040-5056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.03.038, arXiv:0811.2192.

[27] P. Colella, M.R. Dorr, J.A.F. Hittinger, D.F. Martin, High-order, finite-volume methods in mapped coordinates, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (8) (2011) 2952-2976, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.044.

[28] P. McCorquodale, P. Colella, A high-order finite-volume method for conservation laws on locally refined grids, Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 6 (1) (2011) 1-25, https://doi.org/10.2140/camcos.2011.6.1.

[29] C. Helzel, J.A. Rossmanith, B. Taetz, An unstaggered constrained transport method for the 3D ideal magnetohydrodynamic equations, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (10) (2011) 3803-3829, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2011.02.009, arXiv:1007.2606.

[30] A. Susanto, L. Ivan, H. De Sterck, C.P.T. Groth, High-order central ENO finite-volume scheme for ideal MHD, J. Comput. Phys. 250 (2013) 141-164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.04.040.

[31] D.S. Balsara, Higher-order accurate space-time schemes for computational astrophysics—Part I: finite volume methods, Living Rev. Comput. Astrophys. 3 (1) (2017) 2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41115-017-0002-8, arXiv:1703.01241.

[32] D. Lee, H. Faller, A. Reyes, The piecewise cubic method (pcm) for computational fluid dynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 341 (2016) 230-257.

[33] S. Li, A fourth-order divergence-free method for MHD flows, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (20) (2010) 7893-7910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.06.044.

[34] J. Núñez-de la Rosa, C.-D. Munz, XTROEM-FV: a new code for computational astrophysics based on very high order finite-volume methods - I. Magnetohydrodynamics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455 (4) (2016) 3458-3479, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2531.

[35] J. Núñez-de la Rosa, C.-D. Munz, xtroem-fv: a new code for computational astrophysics based on very high order finite-volume methods - II. Relativistic hydro- and magnetohydrodynamics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460 (1) (2016) 535-559, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw999, https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/460/1/535/8116559/stw999.pdf.

[36] K.G. Felker, J.M. Stone, A fourth-order accurate finite volume method for ideal MHD via upwind constrained transport, J. Comput. Phys. 375 (2018) 1365-1400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.025, arXiv:1711.07439.

[37] Y. Matsumoto, Y. Asahina, Y. Kudoh, T. Kawashima, J. Matsumoto, H.R. Takahashi, T. Minoshima, S. Zenitani, T. Miyoshi, R. Matsumoto, Magnetohydrodynamic simulation code CANS+: assessments and applications, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 71 (4) (2019) 83, https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psz064, arXiv:1611.01775.

[38] P.S. Verma, J.-M. Teissier, O. Henze, W.-C. Müller, Fourth-order accurate finite-volume CWENO scheme for astrophysical MHD problems, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 482 (1) (2019) 416-437, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2641.

[39] A. Suresh, H.T. Huynh, Accurate monotonicity-preserving schemes with Runge Kutta time stepping, J. Comput. Phys. 136 (1997) 83-99, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcp.1997.5745.

[40] G.-S. Jiang, C.-W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 126 (1) (1996) 202-228, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcp.1996.0130.

[41] R. Borges, M. Carmona, B. Costa, W.S. Don, An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (6) (2008) 3191-3211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.11.038.

[42] M. Castro, B. Costa, W.S. Don, High order weighted essentially non-oscillatory WENO-Z schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (5) (2011) 1766-1792, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.11.028.

[43] L. Isherwood, Z.J. Grant, S. Gottlieb, Downwinding for preserving strong stability in explicit integrating factor Runge-Kutta methods, arXiv:1810.04800, 2018.

[44] R.J. Spiteri, S.J. Ruuth, A new class of optimal high-order strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40 (2) (2003) 469-491.

[45] C.R. Evans, J.F. Hawley, Simulation of magnetohydrodynamic flows - a constrained transport method, Astrophys. J. 332 (1988) 659-677, https://doi.org/10.1086/166684.

[46] D. Ryu, F. Miniati, T.W. Jones, A. Frank, A divergence-free upwind code for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamic flows, Astrophys. J. 509 (1) (1998) 244-255, https://doi.org/10.1086/306481, arXiv:astro-ph/9807228.

[47] P. Londrillo, L. Del Zanna, On the divergence-free condition in Godunov-type schemes for ideal magnetohydrodynamics: the upwind constrained transport method, J. Comput. Phys. 195 (2004) 17-48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2003.09.016, arXiv:astro-ph/0310183.

[48] J.U. Brackbill, D.C. Barnes, The effect of nonzero V-B on the numerical solution of the magnetohydrodynamic equations, J. Comput. Phys. 35 (3) (1980) 426-430, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(80)90079-0.

[49] K. Yee, Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 14 (3) (1966) 302-307, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1966.1138693.

[50] S.H. Brecht, J. Lyon, J.A. Fedder, K. Hain, A simulation study of east-west IMF effects on the magnetosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett. 8 (4) (1981) 397-400, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL008i004p00397.
[12] J. Rossmanith, An unstaggered, high-resolution constrained transport method for magnetohydrodynamic flows, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28 (2006) 1766-1797, https://doi.org/10.1137/050627022.

[13] G. Tóth, D.L. De Zeeuw, T.I. Gombosi, K.G. Powell, A parallel explicit/implicit time stepping scheme on block-adaptive grids, J. Comput. Phys. 217 (2) (2006) 722-758, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2006.01.029.

[14] D. Lee, A.E. Deane, An unsplit staggered mesh scheme for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (4) (2009) 952-975, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2008.08.026.

[15] A. Mignone, P. Tzeferacos, G. Bodo, High-order conservative finite difference GLM-MHD schemes for cell-centered MHD, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (17) (2010) 5896-5920, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.04.013, arXiv:1001.2832.

[16] C.D. Meyer, D.S. Balsara, T.D. Aslam, A second-order accurate Super TimeStepping formulation for anisotropic thermal conduction, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 422 (3) (2012) 2102-2115, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20744.x.

[17] A. Mignone, M. Flock, M. Stute, S.M. Kolb, G. Muscianisi, A conservative orbital advection scheme for simulations of magnetized shear flows with the PLUTO code, Astron. Astrophys. 545 (2012) A152, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219557, arXiv:1207.2955.

[18] A. Mignone, L. Del Zanna, Systematic construction of upwind constrained transport schemes for MHD, J. Comput. Phys. 424 (2021) 109748, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109748, arXiv:2004.10542.

[19] P. Londrillo, L. Del Zanna, High-order upwind schemes for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamics, Astrophys. J. 530 (1) (2000) 508-524, https://doi.org/10.1086/308344, arXiv:astro-ph/9910086.

[20] L. Del Zanna, O. Zanotti, N. Bucciantini, P. Londrillo, ECHO: a Eulerian conservative high-order scheme for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics and magnetodynamics, Astron. Astrophys. 473 (2007) 11-30, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077093, arXiv:0704.3206.

[21] A.J. Christlieb, J.A. Rossmanith, Q. Tang, Finite difference weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with constrained transport for ideal magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 268 (2014) 302-325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03.001, arXiv:1309.3344.

[22] Y. Chen, G. Tóth, T.I. Gombosi, A fifth-order finite difference scheme for hyperbolic equations on block-adaptive curvilinear grids, J. Comput. Phys. 305 (2016) 604-621, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.11.003.

[23] T. Minoshima, T. Miyoshi, Y. Matsumoto, A high-order weighted finite difference scheme with a multistate approximate Riemann solver for divergence-free magnetohydrodynamic simulations, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 242 (2) (2019) 14, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab1a36, arXiv:1903.04759.

[24] A. Reyes, D. Lee, C. Graziani, P. Tzeferacos, A variable high-order shock-capturing finite difference method with GP-WENO, J. Comput. Phys. 381 (2019) 189-217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.12.028, arXiv:1808.04960.

[25] C.-W. Shu, High order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems, SIAM Rev. 51 (1) (2009) 82-126, https://doi.org/10.1137/070679065.

[26] D.S. Balsara, Divergence-free reconstruction of magnetic fields and WENO schemes for magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (14) (2009) 5040-5056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.03.038, arXiv:0811.2192.

[27] P. Colella, M.R. Dorr, J.A.F. Hittinger, D.F. Martin, High-order, finite-volume methods in mapped coordinates, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (8) (2011) 2952-2976, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.044.

[28] P. McCorquodale, P. Colella, A high-order finite-volume method for conservation laws on locally refined grids, Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 6 (1) (2011) 1-25, https://doi.org/10.2140/camcos.2011.6.1.

[29] C. Helzel, J.A. Rossmanith, B. Taetz, An unstaggered constrained transport method for the 3D ideal magnetohydrodynamic equations, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (10) (2011) 3803-3829, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2011.02.009, arXiv:1007.2606.

[30] A. Susanto, L. Ivan, H. De Sterck, C.P.T. Groth, High-order central ENO finite-volume scheme for ideal MHD, J. Comput. Phys. 250 (2013) 141-164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.04.040.

[31] D.S. Balsara, Higher-order accurate space-time schemes for computational astrophysics—Part I: finite volume methods, Living Rev. Comput. Astrophys. 3 (1) (2017) 2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41115-017-0002-8, arXiv:1703.01241.

[32] D. Lee, H. Faller, A. Reyes, The piecewise cubic method (pcm) for computational fluid dynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 341 (2016) 230-257.

[33] S. Li, A fourth-order divergence-free method for MHD flows, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (20) (2010) 7893-7910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.06.044.

[34] J. Núñez-de la Rosa, C.-D. Munz, XTROEM-FV: a new code for computational astrophysics based on very high order finite-volume methods - I. Magnetohydrodynamics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455 (4) (2016) 3458-3479, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2531.

[35] J. Núñez-de la Rosa, C.-D. Munz, xtroem-fv: a new code for computational astrophysics based on very high order finite-volume methods - II. Relativistic hydro- and magnetohydrodynamics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460 (1) (2016) 535-559, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw999, https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/460/1/535/8116559/stw999.pdf.

[36] K.G. Felker, J.M. Stone, A fourth-order accurate finite volume method for ideal MHD via upwind constrained transport, J. Comput. Phys. 375 (2018) 1365-1400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.025, arXiv:1711.07439.

[37] Y. Matsumoto, Y. Asahina, Y. Kudoh, T. Kawashima, J. Matsumoto, H.R. Takahashi, T. Minoshima, S. Zenitani, T. Miyoshi, R. Matsumoto, Magnetohydrodynamic simulation code CANS+: assessments and applications, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 71 (4) (2019) 83, https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psz064, arXiv:1611.01775.

[38] P.S. Verma, J.-M. Teissier, O. Henze, W.-C. Müller, Fourth-order accurate finite-volume CWENO scheme for astrophysical MHD problems, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 482 (1) (2019) 416-437, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2641.

[39] A. Suresh, H.T. Huynh, Accurate monotonicity-preserving schemes with Runge Kutta time stepping, J. Comput. Phys. 136 (1997) 83-99, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcp.1997.5745.

[40] G.-S. Jiang, C.-W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 126 (1) (1996) 202-228, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcp.1996.0130.

[41] R. Borges, M. Carmona, B. Costa, W.S. Don, An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (6) (2008) 3191-3211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.11.038.

[42] M. Castro, B. Costa, W.S. Don, High order weighted essentially non-oscillatory WENO-Z schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (5) (2011) 1766-1792, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.11.028.

[43] L. Isherwood, Z.J. Grant, S. Gottlieb, Downwinding for preserving strong stability in explicit integrating factor Runge-Kutta methods, arXiv:1810.04800, 2018.

[44] R.J. Spiteri, S.J. Ruuth, A new class of optimal high-order strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40 (2) (2003) 469-491.

[45] C.R. Evans, J.F. Hawley, Simulation of magnetohydrodynamic flows - a constrained transport method, Astrophys. J. 332 (1988) 659-677, https://doi.org/10.1086/166684.

[46] D. Ryu, F. Miniati, T.W. Jones, A. Frank, A divergence-free upwind code for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamic flows, Astrophys. J. 509 (1) (1998) 244-255, https://doi.org/10.1086/306481, arXiv:astro-ph/9807228.

[47] P. Londrillo, L. Del Zanna, On the divergence-free condition in Godunov-type schemes for ideal magnetohydrodynamics: the upwind constrained transport method, J. Comput. Phys. 195 (2004) 17-48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2003.09.016, arXiv:astro-ph/0310183.

[48] J.U. Brackbill, D.C. Barnes, The effect of nonzero V-B on the numerical solution of the magnetohydrodynamic equations, J. Comput. Phys. 35 (3) (1980) 426-430, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(80)90079-0.

[49] K. Yee, Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 14 (3) (1966) 302-307, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1966.1138693.

[50] S.H. Brecht, J. Lyon, J.A. Fedder, K. Hain, A simulation study of east-west IMF effects on the magnetosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett. 8 (4) (1981) 397-400, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL008i004p00397.
[51] V.A. Titarev, E.F. Toro, Finite-volume WENO schemes for three-dimensional conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 201 (1) (2004) 238-260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.05.015.

[52] N.K. Yamaleev, M.H. Carpenter, Third-order energy stable WENO scheme, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009) 3025-3047, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.01.011.

[53] P.L. Roe, Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 43 (2) (1981) 357-372, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5.

[54] A. Harten, P. Lax, B. Leer, On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM Rev. 25 (1) (1983) 35-61, https://doi.org/10.1137/1025002.

[55] E.F. Toro, M. Spruce, W. Speares, Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver, Shock Waves 4 (1994) 25-34, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01414629.

[56] S. Li, An HLLC Riemann solver for magneto-hydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 203 (1) (2005) 344-357, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.08.020.

[57] T. Miyoshi, K. Kusano, A multi-state HLL approximate Riemann solver for ideal magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 208 (1) (2005) 315-344, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.02.017.

[58] A. Mignone, M. Ugliano, G. Bodo, A five-wave Harten-Lax-van Leer Riemann solver for relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 393 (2009) 1141-1156, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14221.x, arXiv:0811.1483.

[59] E. Toro, Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics: a practical introduction, https://doi.org/10.1007/b79761, 2009.

[60] E.F. Toro, V.A. Titarev, MUSTA fluxes for systems of conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 216 (2) (2006) 403-429, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.12.012.

[61] C.-W. Shu, S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 77 (2) (1988) 439-471, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5.

[62] S. Gottlieb, C.-W. Shu, E. Tadmor, Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods, SIAM Rev. 43 (1) (2001) 89-112, https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450036757X.

[63] S. Gottlieb, D. Ketcheson, C. Shu, High order strong stability preserving time discretizations, J. Sci. Comput. 38 (3) (2009) 251-289, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-008-9239-z.

[64] S. Gottlieb, D. Ketcheson, C. Shu, Strong Stability Preserving Runge-Kutta and Multistep Time Discretizations, World Scientific, 2011, https://books.google.it/books?id=MHmAINTBikQC.

[65] D.I. Ketcheson, Highly efficient strong stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods with low-storage implementations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30 (4) (2008) 2113-2136, https://doi.org/10.1137/07070485X.

[66] A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, E. Turkel, Numerical Solution of the Euler Equations by Finite Volume Methods Using Runge Kutta Time Stepping Schemes, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1981.

[67] M.L.B. de Oliveira, V.A. Pires, Analysis of a high-order finite difference detector for discontinuities, Int. J. Comput. Math. 94 (4) (2017) 676-689, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2015.1124100.

[68] A. Mignone, G. Bodo, S. Massaglia, T. Matsakos, O. Tesileanu, C. Zanni, A. Ferrari, PLUTO: a numerical code for computational astrophysics, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 170 (2007) 228-242, https://doi.org/10.1086/513316, arXiv:astro-ph/0701854.

[69] A. Mignone, C. Zanni, P. Tzeferacos, B. van Straalen, P. Colella, G. Bodo, The PLUTO code for adaptive mesh computations in astrophysical fluid dynamics, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 198 (2012) 7, https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/7, arXiv:1110.0740.

[70] D. Ryu, T.W. Jones, A. Frank, Numerical magnetohydrodynamics in astrophysics: algorithm and tests for multidimensional flow, Astrophys. J. 452 (1995) 785, https://doi.org/10.1086/176347, arXiv:astro-ph/9505073.

[71] T.A. Gardiner, J.M. Stone, An unsplit Godunov method for ideal MHD via constrained transport in three dimensions, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (8) (2008) 4123-4141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.12.017, arXiv:0712.2634.

[72] D. Balsara, Total variation diminishing scheme for relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 132 (1) (2001) 83-101, https://doi.org/10.1086/318941.

[73] L. Antón, J.A. Miralles, J.M. Martí, J.M. Ibáñez, M.A. Aloy, P. Mimica, Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics: renormalized eigenvectors and full wave decomposition Riemann solver, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 188 (1) (2010) 1-31, https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/188/1/1, arXiv:0912.4692.

[74] M. Dumbser, D.S. Balsara, E.F. Toro, C.-D. Munz, A unified framework for the construction of one-step finite volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes on unstructured meshes, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (18) (2008) 8209-8253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2008.05.025.

[75] A. Mignone, A simple and accurate Riemann solver for isothermal MHD, J. Comput. Phys. 225 (2) (2007) 1427-1441, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.033, arXiv:astro-ph/0701798.

[76] K. Beckwith, J.M. Stone, A second-order Godunov method for multi-dimensional relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 193 (1) (2011) 6, https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/6, arXiv:1101.3573.

[77] J.F. Hawley, J.M. Stone, MOCCT: a numerical technique for astrophysical MHD, Comput. Phys. Commun. 89 (1-3) (1995) 127-148, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(95)00190-Q.

[78] S.A. Orszag, C.M. Tang, Small-scale structure of two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 90 (1979) 129-143, https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211207900210X.

[79] C.F. Gammie, J.C. McKinney, G. Tóth, HARM: a numerical scheme for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, Astrophys. J. 589 (1) (2003) 444-457, https://doi.org/10.1086/374594, arXiv:astro-ph/0301509.

[80] M. Dumbser, O. Zanotti, Very high order $P_N P_M$ schemes on unstructured meshes for the resistive relativistic MHD equations, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (18) (2009) 6991-7006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.06.009, arXiv:0903.4832.

[81] S. Landi, L. Del Zanna, E. Papini, F. Pucci, M. Velli, Resistive magnetohydrodynamics simulations of the ideal tearing mode, Astrophys. J. 806 (1) (2015) 131, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/131, arXiv:1504.07036.

[82] E. Papini, S. Landi, L. Del Zanna, Fast magnetic reconnection: secondary tearing instability and role of the Hall term, Astrophys. J. 885 (1) (2019) 56, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4352, arXiv:1906.06779.

[83] G. Mattia, A. Mignone, A comparison of approximate non-linear Riemann solvers for relativistic MHD, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510 (1) (2022) 481-499, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab337, arXiv:2111.09369.

[84] U. Ziegler, A central-constrained transport scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 196 (2) (2004) 393-416, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2003.11.003.

[85] F. Miniati, D.F. Martin, Constrained-transport magnetohydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement in CHARM, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 195 (1) (2011) 5, https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/195/1/5, arXiv:1103.1878.
[51] V.A. Titarev, E.F. Toro, Finite-volume WENO schemes for three-dimensional conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 201 (1) (2004) 238–260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.05.015.

[52] N.K. Yamaleev, M.H. Carpenter, Third-order energy stable WENO scheme, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009) 3025–3047, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.01.011.

[53] P.L. Roe, Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 43 (2) (1981) 357–372, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5.

[54] A. Harten, P. Lax, B. Leer, On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM Rev. 25 (1) (1983) 35–61, https://doi.org/10.1137/1025002.

[55] E.F. Toro, M. Spruce, W. Speares, Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver, Shock Waves 4 (1994) 25–34, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01414629.

[56] S. Li, An HLLC Riemann solver for magneto-hydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 203 (1) (2005) 344–357, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.08.020.

[57] T. Miyoshi, K. Kusano, A multi-state HLL approximate Riemann solver for ideal magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 208 (1) (2005) 315–344, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.02.017.

[58] A. Mignone, M. Ugliano, G. Bodo, A five-wave Harten-Lax-van Leer Riemann solver for relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 393 (2009) 1141–1156, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14221.x, arXiv:0811.1483.

[59] E. Toro, Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics: a practical introduction, https://doi.org/10.1007/b79761, 2009.

[60] E.F. Toro, V.A. Titarev, MUSTA fluxes for systems of conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 216 (2) (2006) 403–429, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.12.012.

[61] C.-W. Shu, S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 77 (2) (1988) 439–471, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5.

[62] S. Gottlieb, C.-W. Shu, E. Tadmor, Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods, SIAM Rev. 43 (1) (2001) 89–112, https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450036757X.

[63] S. Gottlieb, D. Ketcheson, C. Shu, High order strong stability preserving time discretizations, J. Sci. Comput. 38 (3) (2009) 251–289, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-008-9239-z.

[64] S. Gottlieb, D. Ketcheson, C. Shu, Strong Stability Preserving Runge-Kutta and Multistep Time Discretizations, World Scientific, 2011, https://books.google.it/books?id=MHmAINTBikQC.

[65] D.I. Ketcheson, Highly efficient strong stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods with low-storage implementations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30 (4) (2008) 2113–2136, https://doi.org/10.1137/07070485X.

[66] A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, E. Turkel, Numerical Solution of the Euler Equations by Finite Volume Methods Using Runge Kutta Time Stepping Schemes, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1981.

[67] M.L.B. de Oliveira, V.A. Pires, Analysis of a high-order finite difference detector for discontinuities, Int. J. Comput. Math. 94 (4) (2017) 676–689, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2015.1124100.

[68] A. Mignone, G. Bodo, S. Massaglia, T. Matsakos, O. Tesileanu, C. Zanni, A. Ferrari, PLUTO: a numerical code for computational astrophysics, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 170 (2007) 228–242, https://doi.org/10.1086/513316, arXiv:astro-ph/0701854.

[69] A. Mignone, C. Zanni, P. Tzeferacos, B. van Straalen, P. Colella, G. Bodo, The PLUTO code for adaptive mesh computations in astrophysical fluid dynamics, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 198 (2012) 7, https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/7, arXiv:1110.0740.

[70] D. Ryu, T.W. Jones, A. Frank, Numerical magnetohydrodynamics in astrophysics: algorithm and tests for multidimensional flow, Astrophys. J. 452 (1995) 785, https://doi.org/10.1086/176347, arXiv:astro-ph/9505073.

[71] T.A. Gardiner, J.M. Stone, An unsplit Godunov method for ideal MHD via constrained transport in three dimensions, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (8) (2008) 4123–4141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.12.017, arXiv:0712.2634.

[72] D. Balsara, Total variation diminishing scheme for relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 132 (1) (2001) 83–101, https://doi.org/10.1086/318941.

[73] L. Antón, J.A. Miralles, J.M. Martí, J.M. Ibáñez, M.A. Aloy, P. Mimica, Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics: renormalized eigenvectors and full wave decomposition Riemann solver, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 188 (1) (2010) 1–31, https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/188/1/1, arXiv:0912.4692.

[74] M. Dumbser, D.S. Balsara, E.F. Toro, C.-D. Munz, A unified framework for the construction of one-step finite volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes on unstructured meshes, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (18) (2008) 8209–8253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2008.05.025.

[75] A. Mignone, A simple and accurate Riemann solver for isothermal MHD, J. Comput. Phys. 225 (2) (2007) 1427–1441, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.033, arXiv:astro-ph/0701798.

[76] K. Beckwith, J.M. Stone, A second-order Godunov method for multi-dimensional relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 193 (1) (2011) 6, https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/6, arXiv:1101.3573.

[77] J.F. Hawley, J.M. Stone, MOCCT: a numerical technique for astrophysical MHD, Comput. Phys. Commun. 89 (1–3) (1995) 127–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(95)00190-Q.

[78] S.A. Orszag, C.M. Tang, Small-scale structure of two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 90 (1979) 129–143, https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211207900210X.

[79] C.F. Gammie, J.C. McKinney, G. Tóth, HARM: a numerical scheme for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, Astrophys. J. 589 (1) (2003) 444–457, https://doi.org/10.1086/374594, arXiv:astro-ph/0301509.

[80] M. Dumbser, O. Zanotti, Very high order $P_N P_M$ schemes on unstructured meshes for the resistive relativistic MHD equations, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (18) (2009) 6991–7006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.06.009, arXiv:0903.4832.

[81] S. Landi, L. Del Zanna, E. Papini, F. Pucci, M. Velli, Resistive magnetohydrodynamics simulations of the ideal tearing mode, Astrophys. J. 806 (1) (2015) 131, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/131, arXiv:1504.07036.

[82] E. Papini, S. Landi, L. Del Zanna, Fast magnetic reconnection: secondary tearing instability and role of the Hall term, Astrophys. J. 885 (1) (2019) 56, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4352, arXiv:1906.06779.

[83] G. Mattia, A. Mignone, A comparison of approximate non-linear Riemann solvers for relativistic MHD, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510 (1) (2022) 481–499, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab337, arXiv:2111.09369.

[84] U. Ziegler, A central-constrained transport scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 196 (2) (2004) 393–416, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2003.11.003.

[85] F. Miniati, D.F. Martin, Constrained-transport magnetohydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement in CHARM, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 195 (1) (2011) 5, https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/195/1/5, arXiv:1103.1878.