# Early formation of GABAergic synapses governs the development of adult-born neurons in the olfactory bulb.

Marta Pallotto, Antoine Nissant, Jean-Marc Fritschy, Uwe Rudolph, Marco

Sassoè-Pognetto, Patrizia Panzanelli, Pierre-Marie Lledo

► To cite this version:

Marta Pallotto, Antoine Nissant, Jean-Marc Fritschy, Uwe Rudolph, Marco Sassoè-Pognetto, et al. Early formation of GABAergic synapses governs the development of adult-born neurons in the olfactory bulb. Journal of Neuroscience, 2012, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0214-12.2012. pasteur-01586974

HAL Id: pasteur-01586974

https://pasteur.hal.science/pasteur-01586974

Submitted on 13 Sep 2017

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
# Early Formation of GABAergic Synapses Governs the Development of Adult-Born Neurons in the Olfactory Bulb

Marta Pallotto,<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />,³ Antoine Nissant,<fnref n="2" />,³ Jean-Marc Fritschy,⁴ Uwe Rudolph,⁵,⁶ Marco Sassoè-Pognetto,<fnref n="1" /> Patrizia Panzanelli,<fnref n="1" /> and Pierre-Marie Lledo<fnref n="2" />,³

In mammals, olfactory bulb granule cells (GCs) are generated throughout life in the subventricular zone. GABAergic inputs onto newborn neurons likely regulate their maturation, but the details of this process remain still elusive. Here, we investigated the differentiation, synaptic integration, and survival of adult-born GCs when their afferent GABAergic inputs are challenged by conditional gene targeting. Migrating GC precursors were targeted with Cre–eGFP-expressing lentiviral vectors in mice with a floxed gene encoding the GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor α2-subunit (i.e., *Gabra2*). Ablation of the α2-subunit did not affect GC survival but dramatically delayed their maturation. We found a reduction in postsynaptic α2-subunit and gephyrin clusters accompanied by a decrease in the frequency and amplitude of GABAergic postsynaptic currents beginning ~14 d post-injection (dpi). In addition, mutant cells exhibited altered dendritic branching and spine density. Spine loss appeared with mislocation of glutamatergic synapses on dendritic shafts and a reduction of spontaneous glutamatergic postsynaptic currents, underscoring the relevance of afferent GABAergic transmission for a proper synaptic integration of newborn GCs. To test the role of GABAergic signaling during much early stages of GC maturation, we used a genetic strategy to selectively inactivate *Gabra2* in precursor cells of the subventricular zone. In these mice, labeling of newborn GCs with eGFP lentiviruses revealed similar morphological alterations as seen on delayed *Gabra2* inactivation in migrating neuroblasts, with reduced dendritic branching and spine density at 7 dpi. Collectively, these results emphasize the critical role of GABAergic synaptic signaling for structural maturation of adult-born GCs and formation of glutamatergic synapses.

## Introduction

Adult neurogenesis is a unique form of structural plasticity that sculpts preexisting circuit function through the continuous addition and removal of newly formed neurons. Importantly, the impact of this process depends on the overall synaptic activity of the preexisting circuit (Kelsch et al., 2010; Ming and Song, 2011). As a result, some of the most important parameters regulating

adult neurogenesis are guided by the properties of the early synapses impinging onto developing adult-born neurons. The mechanisms that link synaptogenesis with morphological differentiation and functional maturation of the newcomers are particularly interesting because it means that some of the major forces driving synaptic plasticity also act on the long-term survival of adult-born neurons (Yamaguchi and Mori, 2005; Whitman and Greer, 2007; Kelsch et al., 2008; Nissant et al., 2009).

Neurogenic niches persist in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus and the subventricular zone (SVZ) of the adult mammal brain (Altman, 1969; Alvarez-Buylla and Garcia-Verdugo, 2002; Kempermann et al., 2004). Neuroblasts generated in the SVZ migrate along the rostral migratory stream (RMS) to reach the olfactory bulb (OB), in which they differentiate as granule cells (GCs) and periglomerular cells and integrate functionally over several weeks (Lledo et al., 2006). GCs are axonless GABAergic interneurons; their apical dendrites extend radially into the external plexiform layer (EPL) and grow spines that establish reciprocal synapses with the dendrites of mitral cells and tufted cells (Shepherd et al., 2007). In addition, GCs receive axo-dendritic excitatory synapses, as well as inhibitory synapses from local microcircuits. GABAergic signaling regulates early steps of adult neurogenesis (Platel et al., 2008; Ming and Song, 2011); however, its impact on the maturation and synaptic integration

Received Jan. 16, 2012; revised April 6, 2012; accepted April 27, 2012.

Author contributions: J.-M.F., M.S.P., and P.-M.L. designed research; M.P., A.N., and P.P. performed research; U.R. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; M.P., A.N., J.-M.F., M.S.P., P.P., and P.-M.L. analyzed data; J.-M.F., M.S.P., P.P., and P.-M.L. wrote the paper.

The Lledo laboratory was supported by the life insurance company Novalis Taitbout, the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, the Laboratory for Excellence Programme Revive, Agence Nationale de la Recherche Grants ANR-BLAN-SVSE4-LS-110624 and ANR-09-NEUR-004 in the frame of ERA-NET NEURON of the FP7 program by the European Commission. M.P. is the recipient of fellowships sponsored by Università Italo-Françese e Institut Servier, J.-M.F. by Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 31003A_130495, PP by Compagnia di San Paolo Grant 2008-2254, and M.S.P. by the Compagnia di San Paolo (2007) and Regione Piemonte (Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata 2008/bis). We thank Matt Valley for critical reading of this manuscript and Françoise Lazarini for her help in transferring the mouse lines at the Pasteur Institute Animal facility.

Correspondence should be addressed to either of the following Dr. Pierre-Marie Lledo, Institut Pasteur, Perception and Memory Laboratory, 25 rue du Dr. Roux, F-75724 Paris Cedex 15, France, E-mail: pmlledo@pasteur.fr; or Dr. Marco Sassoè-Pognetto, Department of Anatomy, Pharmacology, and Forensic Medicine, University of Turin, and Istituto Nazionale di Neuroscienze, Corso Massimo d’Azeglio 52, I-10126 Turin, Italy, E-mail: marco.sassoe@unito.it.
DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0214-12.2012

<footnote n="1">¹Department of Anatomy, Pharmacology, and Forensic Medicine and National Institute of Neuroscience–Italy, University of Turin, I-10126 Turin, Italy,</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Institut Pasteur, Laboratory for Perception and Memory, Department of Neurosciences, F-75015 Paris, France, ³Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité de Recherche Associée 2182, F-75015 Paris, France, ⁴Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich and Neuroscience Center Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland, and ⁵Laboratory of Genetic Neuropharmacology, McLean Hospital and ⁶Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts 02478-1064</footnote>
<table><caption>**Table 1. Primary antibodies used in this study**</caption><thead><tr><th>Protein target</th><th>Species</th><th>Dilution</th><th>Source; catalog #</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Doublecortin</td><td>Guinea pig</td><td>1:2000</td><td>Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents; AB2253</td><td>Waclaw et al., 2006</td></tr><tr><td>Gephyrin</td><td>Mouse</td><td>1:1000</td><td>Synaptic Systems; mAb7a; 147711</td><td>Panzanelli et al., 2009</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">GFP</td><td>Rabbit</td><td>1:2000</td><td>Synaptic Systems; 132002</td><td rowspan="2">Panzanelli et al., 2009; Duveau et al., 2011</td></tr><tr><td>Chicken</td><td>1:5000</td><td>Aves Laboratories; GFP-1020</td></tr><tr><td>GAD65</td><td>Mouse</td><td>1:1000</td><td>Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa; GAD-6</td><td>Chang and Gottlieb, 1988</td></tr><tr><td>GABA<sub>A</sub>R α2-subunit</td><td>Guinea pig</td><td>1:1000</td><td>Self-made</td><td>Panzanelli et al., 2011</td></tr><tr><td>GABA<sub>A</sub>R α3-subunit</td><td>Guinea pig</td><td>1:8000</td><td>Self-made</td><td>Panzanelli et al., 2011</td></tr><tr><td>PSD95</td><td>Mouse</td><td>1:1000</td><td>University of California, Davis/National Institutes of Health NeuroMab; 75-028</td><td>Panzanelli et al., 2009</td></tr><tr><td>Tyrosine hydroxylase</td><td>Mouse</td><td>1:4000</td><td>Immunostar; 22941</td><td>Holderith et al., 2003</td></tr></tbody></table>

of newborn GCs is unknown. Recently, we have demonstrated that newborn GCs form functional GABAergic and glutamatergic synapses shortly after entering the OB, with an initial predominance of GABAergic synapses (Panzanelli et al., 2009; Katagiri et al., 2011). This observation raises the possibility that GABAergic synaptic transmission regulates the morphological and functional maturation of GCs, which has been previously shown to be controlled by activity-dependent mechanisms (Kelsch et al., 2010; Ming and Song, 2011).

We took advantage of the selective expression of α2-subunit containing GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors (GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs) in GCs (Panzanelli et al., 2009) to irreversibly alter synaptic GABAergic inputs in adult-born GCs through two distinct means. First, cell-specific *Gabra2* ablation was done in neuroblasts migrating to the OB by injecting a lentiviral vector encoding Cre-eGFP into the RMS of mice carrying floxed *Gabra2* alleles. The morphological development of mutant GCs and formation of functional synapses were analyzed with immunohistochemistry and electrophysiology. These experiments revealed impaired GABAergic synaptic responses in mutant cells and striking defects in dendritic development and spine formation, without changing GC survival. The impact of *Gabra2* inactivation on plasticity produced by chronic olfactory deprivation and enrichment was tested to indicate any possible interaction between GABAergic synaptic transmission and the experience-sensitive regulation of GC development. Second, using the Tet-on system in double-transgenic mice, *Gabra2* was deleted in progenitor cells expressing the glial-specific glutamate transporter (GLAST), yielding results comparable with those gained with floxed *Gabra2* mice. Collectively, these data reveal that early GABAergic synaptic transmission controls the activity-dependent development of adult-born GC and influences their synaptic integration into preexisting networks.

## Materials and Methods

### Animals

All experiments were conducted in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive of November 24, 1986 (86/609/EEC) and with institutional approval. The generation of mice carrying the gene for *Gabra2* flanked by LoxP sites (hereafter called α2-FL) has been described previously (Witschi et al., 2011). These transgenic mice were backcrossed on the C57BL/6J background for more than nine generations. Homozygous α2-FL mice were used for conditional deletion of *Gabra2* by Cre-eGFP lentiviral transduction of neuroblasts migrating through the RMS, with wild-type (WT) mice as control. In a second series of experiments, α2 fl/fl-GLAST::CreERT2<sup>+/−</sup> transgenic mice were obtained by cross-mating GLAST::CreERT2 mice (a gift from Prof. Magdalena Götz, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany; see Mori et al., 2006) with α2-FL mice. In these double-mutant mice, hereafter called α2-GLAST, *Gabra2* deletion was induced in GLAST-expressing (GLAST<sup>+</sup>) progenitor cells during systemic tamoxifen (Tam) administration. Control mice were injected with vehicle [corn oil (Oil)].

Mice were housed under a 12 h light/dark cycle, with food and water available *ad libitum*.

### Lentiviral vectors

A replication-deficient lentiviral vector was used to express Cre recombinase and eGFP in newborn GCs of α2-FL and WT control mice. We used a plasmid generously provided by Tyler Jacks (Addgene, Cambridge, MA) (Plasmid 20781: UbC-GFP.PGK-Cre vector). The concentration of lentiviral vector particles used was 115 ng of p24 per microliter (the p24 protein is a nucleocapsid protein used as an important early marker of HIV infection). Average vector titers were in the order of 10<sup>9</sup> transduction units per milliliter. For visualization of eGFP in newborn GC of α2-GLAST mice, we used a custom-built lentivirus driven by the phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter as described previously (Grubb et al., 2008).

### Stereotaxic injections

Adult male mice, 8 to 12 weeks old at the time of virus injection, were used for morphological analyses (n = 94) and electrophysiological recordings (n = 48). Mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of xylazine (Rompun; Bayer Health Care) and ketamine (Imalgene; Merial) dissolved in PBS at a dose of 10 and 120 mg/kg respectively, and mounted on a stereotaxic apparatus (David Kopf Instruments). We performed bilateral injections into the RMS at the following coordinates, using bregma as reference: mediolateral, ±0.82 mm; anteroposterior, +3.3 mm; and −2.90 mm from the pial surface (Panzanelli et al., 2009). Viral vector particles (200 nl) were injected using nanoliter injector Nanoject II (Drummond Scientific) with a glass micropipette at a rate of 23 nl/s. Animals were killed at the indicated survival times after virus injection (in which dpi is days post-injection).

### Olfactory enrichment and deprivation

**Chemical ablation of olfactory epithelium.** Seven days after lentivirus injection, α2-FL and WT mice were given one intraperitoneal injection of dichlobenil (2,6-dichlobenonzitrile, 25 µg/g body weight; Fluka) in dimethylsulfoxide (2 µl/g body weight) or vehicle as control as described previously (Vedin et al., 2004). Mice were killed at 30 dpi. The efficacy of this sensory deafferentation protocol was confirmed by assessing the decrease of tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity in the glomerular layer of the OB (data not shown; but see Stone et al., 1991).

**Olfactory enrichment.** Starting 7 d after viral injection, mice were exposed daily to three different aromatic fragrances during 3 weeks (Rochefort et al., 2002). The odorants were placed inside a tea ball hanging from the cage roof. In the control group, empty tea balls were placed in the cage. The substances used have been listed by Alonso et al. (2008). Mice were killed for analysis after 30 dpi.

### Tissue processing for immunohistochemistry

Two different protocols were used for optimal detection of the markers.

**Quickly fixed tissue.** Mice were deeply anesthetized (sodium pentobarbital; 50 mg/kg, i.p.; Sanofi-Aventis) and decapitated. The OB was removed, collected in ice-cold artificial CSF (ACSF), and cut in 300-µm-thick horizontal slices with a sliding microtome (VT 1000S; Leica), as described previously (Schneider Gasser et al., 2006). Slices were incubated in oxygenated ACSF for 30 min at 35°C, fixed by immersion in 4%
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

**Figure 1.** Effects of Cre-mediated deletion of *Gabra2* gene in adult-born GCs. **A**, Schematic diagram of the experimental approach to label adult-born GCs by stereotaxic injection of a lentiviral vector expressing Cre recombinase and eGFP into the RMS. Infected cells are readily recognized by eGFP labeling. **B**, Schematic localization of the markers analyzed by immunohistochemistry at GABAergic synapses made on adult-born GCs. **C**, Images from confocal laser-scanning microscopy depicting the presence of α2-subunit-immunoreactive clusters (red) in eGFP + cells of WT and α2-FL mice after 90 dpi, confirmed by colocalization analysis (yellow; arrowheads). Note the almost complete disappearance of α2-subunit clusters in adult-born cells of α2-FL mice at this stage. Each image represents a 3-D projection of a stack of confocal layers spaced 0.35 µm, shown in the three Cartesian planes. **D**, Images depicting the presence of α3-subunit clusters (red) in eGFP + cells of WT and α2-FL mice after 90 dpi, as confirmed by colocalization analysis (yellow, arrowheads). **E, F**, Quantification of α2- and α3-subunit clusters (mean ± SEM) in the cell body and apical dendrite of adult-born GCs in WT and α2-FL mice. **G**, Images of gephyrin clusters (red) in eGFP + cells of WT and α2-FL mice after 90 dpi, as confirmed by colocalization analysis (yellow; arrowheads). **H**, Quantification of gephyrin clusters (mean ± SEM) showing the decreased gephyrin cluster density in cell body and in the apical dendrite in mutant cells at 30–90 dpi. **I**, Images depicting the presence of GAD65-immunoreactive puncta apposed to eGFP + cells (yellow, arrowheads) after 90 dpi in both genotypes. **J**, Quantification of GAD65 puncta, representing putative synaptic input, onto the cell body and apical dendrite of adult-born GCs (mean ± SEM). No difference was observed at any time point. \*p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with *post hoc* test (for statistical analyses, see Table 2). Scale bars, 10 µm.

formaldehyde at room temperature for 12 min, cryoprotected in 30% sucrose, flat frozen, and sectioned with a cryostat (Microm HM 560). The 16-µm-thick cryosections were mounted onto gelatin-coated glass slides and stored at –20°C.

*Perfused tissue.* Mice were anesthetized as above and fixed by intracardial perfusion of PBS, followed by ice-cold 4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. The brains were removed, postfixed in the same fixative overnight, and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose. The OBs were then

frozen with dry ice and cut into 50-µm-thick coronal sections with a cryostat. Sections were stored in antifreeze solution (15% glucose and 30% ethylene glycol in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) at –20°C.

*Immunofluorescence staining*

Double and triple immunofluorescence was performed by incubating tissue sections in a mixture of primary antibodies raised in different species (Table 1), diluted in PSB with 5% normal donkey serum (Jackson Immuno
Research) and 0.05% Triton X-100. Sections were then washed in PBS, incubated for 30 min at room temperature in secondary antibodies raised in donkey, and conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen), Cy3, or Cy5 (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Finally, the sections were rinsed again and mounted on glass slides using a fluorescence mounting medium (Dako).

## Image acquisition and data analysis

Sections were visualized by confocal laser-scanning microscopy (LSM5 Pascal; Carl Zeiss) using sequential acquisition of separate channels to avoid fluorescence crosstalk. Stacks of confocal sections were acquired with either a 40× (numerical aperture 1.3) or 100× (numerical aperture 1.4) objective, with the pinhole set at 1 Airy unit. For display, images were processed with the image analysis software Imaris (version 4.3; Bitplane). For quantification of the number of GABA<sub>A</sub> subunit, gephyrin, and PSD95 clusters, as well as vesicular GABA transporter-expressing boutons, single confocal layers were used (pixel size, 70–90 nm). The colocalization algorithm of Imaris was used with a threshold set ~100 to determine the presence of clusters in eGFP<sup>+</sup> structures. All counting was performed manually on dendrite segments measuring 20–50 µm. The results were averaged per animal, with each group and time point comprising at least three mice.

The dendritic morphology of newborn GCs was analyzed in 50-µm-thick sections from perfused tissue stained for eGFP. Confocal images of randomly selected deep and superficial GCs were acquired, spaced by 1 µm across the entire thickness of the section with a 40× objective and analyzed with the software NIH Image J 1.34S. Total dendritic length and number of branches were determined on 3-D projections using the NeuronJ plug-in. Sholl analysis was performed with concentric circles spaced 10 µm and centered on the cell soma (Sholl Analysis plugin, Anirvan Ghosh Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA). For statistical comparison, the area under the curve (AUC) of the resulting function was calculated. Quantifications were performed on 12–15 cells from three mice of each experimental group.

Spine density was determined on apical dendritic segments of eGFP<sup>+</sup> GCs, including secondary and tertiary branches in the EPL. At least 10 stacks consisting of 10–15 confocal sections were analyzed per animal using NIH ImageJ software. All dendritic protrusions with a clearly recognizable neck connected to the shaft of the dendrite were counted as spines. Measurement of spine density was performed on 3-D-projected image stacks.

## Preembedding immunoelectron microscopy

α2-FL mice were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, i.p.) and perfused with 2% formaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in sodium acetate buffer, pH 6, for 2 min, followed by 1 h perfusion with 2% formaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M borate buffer, pH 9 (Kollo et al., 2008). The

brain was taken out and postfixed in the second fixative overnight. Tissue blocks containing the OBs were cut into 80 µm coronal sections with a vibrating microtome (VT 1000S; Leica). Sections were cryoprotected with 30% sucrose and frozen/thawed three times with liquid nitrogen to enhance antibody penetration. Sections were then incubated in primary

<table><caption>**Table 2. Statistical analysis of synaptic markers in newborn granule cells**</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Two-way ANOVA</th><th>p<sub>genotype</sub></th><th>p<sub>time</sub></th><th>Interaction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>α2-Subunit</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Apical dendrite</td><td>F<sub>(3,16)</sub> = 7.207</td><td>0.014</td><td>0.170</td><td>0.003</td></tr><tr><td>Cell body</td><td>F<sub>(3,16)</sub> = 8.617</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>0.071</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gephyrin</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Apical dendrite</td><td>F<sub>(3,16)</sub> = 6.703</td><td>0.001</td><td>0.849</td><td>0.004</td></tr><tr><td>Cell body</td><td>F<sub>(3,16)</sub> = 6.622</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>0.009</td><td>0.004</td></tr><tr><td><strong>GAD65</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Apical dendrite</td><td>F<sub>(3,16)</sub> = 1.561</td><td>0.525</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>0.238</td></tr><tr><td>Cell body</td><td>F<sub>(3,16)</sub> = 0.352</td><td>0.292</td><td>0.348</td><td>0.788</td></tr></tbody></table>

The density of α2-subunit and gephyrin clusters, representing putative postsynaptic sites, as well as GAD65<sup>+</sup> puncta, representing presynaptic terminals, was analyzed in WT and α2-FL mice. For each genotype, data were further analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunn's post hoc test (see Results).

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Reduction of GABAergic currents in newborn GCs from α2-FL mice. Electrophysiological properties of eGFP<sup>+</sup> GCs were assessed by whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. A, Recording configuration. Rec, Recording electrode; Stim, stimulation electrode located in the GCL to elicit IPSCs (glass pipette). B, Examples of eIPSCs recorded at V<sub>e</sub> = 0 mV at 14 dpi. Representative traces were averaged from >20 recorded IPSCs. Calibration: 20 ms, 25 pA. C, Histograms of eIPSC amplitude (picoamperes; mean ± SD) for WT and α2-FL cells. D, Examples of sIPSCs recorded from a WT cell (gray) and an α2-FL cell (red) at 30 dpi (V<sub>e</sub> = 0 mV; calibration: 50 ms, 10 pA). In the right, normalized sIPSC amplitudes are displayed to illustrate their relative kinetics. E, F, Histograms of the frequency and amplitude of sIPSCs in WT and α2-FL cells (mean ± SD). G, H, Histograms of sIPSC decay time constant (Tau<sub>fast</sub> derived from double-exponential fitting) and rise time (measured from 20 to 80% of peak amplitude). For statistical analysis, see Tables 3 and 4 A (*p* < 0.05; **p* < 0.01; ***p* < 0.001).</figcaption></figure>

antibodies against gephyrin and GFP (Table 1) diluted in Tris-buffered saline containing 10% normal goat serum for 72 h at 4°C. After several rinses, the sections were incubated with rabbit IgGs coupled to biotin (1:250; Vector Laboratories) and mouse IgGs coupled to 1.4 nm colloidal gold particles (1:200; Nanoprobes) for 24 h at room temperature. A standard immunoperoxidase reaction was performed to detect eGFP
(Vectastain Elite; Vector Laboratories), whereas nanogold particles were visualized with the gold enhanced-EM formulation (Nanoprobes), as described by the manufacturer. The sections were treated with 0.5% $OsO_4$ and 1% uranyl acetate, dehydrated, and embedded into Epon 812. Serial ultrathin sections were collected on copper single-hole grids and observed in a JEM-1010 transmission electron microscope (Jeol) equipped with a side-mounted CCD camera (Mega View III; Soft Imaging System) for photography.

## Electrophysiology

For patch-clamp recordings, α2-FL and WT mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane (Mundipharma) and swiftly decapitated. The OB and frontal cortices were rapidly dissected and placed in ice-cold ACSF containing the following (in mM): 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.3 $MgSO_4$, 26 $NaHCO_3$, 1.25 $NaHPO_4$, 20 glucose, and 2 $CaCl_2$ (~310 mOsm, pH 7.3) when bubbled with a mixture of 95% $O_2$ and 5% $CO_2$; all chemicals from Sigma). They were then glued to a block of 4% agarose and placed, submerged in ice-cold ACSF, in the cutting chamber of a vibrating microtome (VT 1200S; Leica). Horizontal slices (300 µm thick) of the OBs were placed in bubbled ACSF in a warming bath at 35°C for 30 min and then at room temperature (i.e., 22 ± 1°C). For whole-cell recordings, individual slices were placed in a chamber mounted on a Carl Zeiss Axioskop upright microscope and continuously perfused (1.5 ml/min) with room temperature bubbled ACSF. Slices were visualized using a 40× water-immersion objective, a halogen light source, differential interference contrast filters (Carl Zeiss), and a CCD camera (C7500; Hamamatsu). We obtained whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from visually targeted eGFP-labeled GCs. Patch pipettes, pulled from borosilicate glass [1.5 mm outer diameter, 1.17 mm inner diameter (Harvard Apparatus); P-87 Flaming/Brown micropipette puller (Sutter Instrument)], had resistances of 6–10 MΩ, and were filled with a cesium gluconate-based solution [in mM: 126 Cs-gluconate, 6 CsCl, 2 NaCl, 10 Na-HEPES, 10 D-glucose, 0.2 Cs-EGTA, 0.3 GTP, 2 Mg-ATP, and 0.2 cAMP (with 0.15% biocytin; 280–290 mOsm, pH 7.3)]. Rhodamine (0.1–0.4%) was included in the internal solution for eGFP + cell recordings. All membrane potentials indicated in the text are corrected for a measured liquid junction potential of +10 mV.

Adult-born cells were identified by either double labeling with both eGFP and rhodamine during recording or the presence of eGFP in the tip of the patch pipette after membrane rupture. eGFP-targeted recordings that did not meet either of these criteria were discarded from our analyses. Recordings were obtained via an Axopatch 1D amplifier. Signals were Bessel filtered at 2 kHz, digitized, and sampled at intervals of 20–450 µs (2.2–50 kHz) according to the individual protocols. Compensation for fast capacitance in cell-attached mode was ~80% (12–13 pF, 3–5 µs); we also compensated for membrane capacitance ($C_m$) but not series resistance ($R_s$), after membrane rupture. With $C_m$ compensation inactivated, values of $C_m$, $R_s$ and membrane resistance ($R_m$) were estimated using peak and steady-state currents, respectively, observed in response to a 5 mV membrane step. Any experiment in which $R_s$ changed by >20% was discarded from our analyses. Currents mediated by Na⁺ voltage-gated channels were measured under voltage-clamp conditions. Depolarizing pulses (100 ms) from –70 mV to incremental steps (5 mV), up to +10 mV, were given at a rate of 1 Hz. Na⁺ currents were measured after subtraction of scaled passive current responses to the appropriate voltage steps.

Synaptic responses were evoked using a small monopolar stimulating glass pipette (3–4 µm tip diameter, pulled from 1.5 mm outer diameter and 1.17 mm inner diameter borosilicate glass, and filled with ACSF), finely positioned in the GC layer (GCL). Spontaneous (s) and evoked (e) synaptic currents were analyzed with Elphy software (Gerard Sadoc, Gif-sur-Yvette, France). The amplitude of ePSCs was measured from averaged traces (10–30 traces). Spontaneous synaptic currents were recorded during ≥5 min. Rise times were measured between 20 and 80% of peak amplitude. For IPSCs, decay time constants were derived by fitting the formula $F(t) = a \times \exp(-t/t_{fast}) + b \times \exp(-t/t_{slow})$, where a and b are the peak amplitude of fast and slow components, respectively, and $t_{fast}$ and $t_{slow}$ are the respective decay time constants. A monoexponential fitted all EPSCs.

<table><caption>**Table 3. Statistical analysis of postsynaptic currents**</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Two-way ANOVA</th><th>p<sub>genotype</sub></th><th>p<sub>time</sub></th><th>Interaction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>eIPSC amplitude</td><td>F<sub>(3,99)</sub> = 8.569</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>0.0001</td></tr><tr><td>sIPSC amplitude</td><td>F<sub>(3,75)</sub> = 0.876</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>0.017</td><td>0.458</td></tr><tr><td>sIPSC frequency</td><td>F<sub>(3,85)</sub> = 2.105</td><td>0.001</td><td>0.014</td><td>0.105</td></tr><tr><td>sIPSC decay time</td><td>F<sub>(3,63)</sub> = 0.243</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>0.691</td><td>0.866</td></tr><tr><td>sIPSC rise time</td><td>F<sub>(3,64)</sub> = 1.363</td><td>0.049</td><td>0.011</td><td>0.262</td></tr><tr><td>sEPSC amplitude</td><td>F<sub>(3,98)</sub> = 0.301</td><td>0.595</td><td>0.348</td><td>0.823</td></tr><tr><td>sEPSC frequency</td><td>F<sub>(3,95)</sub> = 0.981</td><td>0.006</td><td>0.006</td><td>0.405</td></tr><tr><td>sEPSC decay time</td><td>F<sub>(3,99)</sub> = 1.199</td><td>0.772</td><td>0.728</td><td>0.314</td></tr><tr><td>sEPSC rise time</td><td>F<sub>(3,108)</sub> = 0.683</td><td>0.703</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.564</td></tr><tr><td>Capacitance</td><td>F<sub>(3,126)</sub> = 0.815</td><td>0.484</td><td>0.0011</td><td>0.488</td></tr><tr><td>Membrane resistance</td><td>F<sub>(3,115)</sub> = 1.12</td><td>0.052</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>0.3442</td></tr><tr><td>Na<sup>+</sup> current density</td><td>F<sub>(3,122)</sub> = 0.579</td><td>0.4143</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>0.630</td></tr></tbody></table>

Additional analysis per genotype and/or time point is presented in Table 4.

## Statistical analyses

Data are presented as mean ± SD or SEM (see Tables 2–6). Statistical analyses include one-way and two-way ANOVA with *post hoc* correction using Prism5 software (GraphPad Software). For a given day post-injection, α2-FL and WT groups were compared two-by-two by Student's *t* test and Mann–Whitney *U* test.

# Results

## Conditional deletion of *Gabra2* causes delayed removal of α2-GABAARs in adult-born GCs

GABAergic inhibition in GCs is mediated mainly by α2-containing GABAARs (Panzanelli et al., 2009). To investigate the functional impact of GABAergic inputs in adult-born GCs, we silenced GABAergic transmission by injecting a Cre–eGFP-encoding lentivirus into the RMS of adult α2-FL mice (Fig. 1A,B). Cre recombinase inactivates *Gabra2* by inducing a site-specific recombination of exon 5 flanked by LoxP sites (Panzanelli et al., 2011), whereas eGFP allows the visualization of transduced cells. Immunohistochemistry revealed the presence of Cre recombinase in the nucleus of eGFP + cells from 7 to 90 dpi (data not shown).

We performed double labeling for eGFP and the α2-subunit to verify the efficacy and time course of Cre-mediated deletion of *Gabra2*. Quantification was done in both the cell body and the proximal domain (i.e., the initial portion of the apical dendrite located in the GCL and extending up to 50 µm away from the cell body) of the apical dendrite (Fig. 1C–E). Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of genotype and a significant interaction between time and genotype in both regions (Table 2). In WT mice, the density of α2-subunit-positive perisomatic clusters increased significantly from 7 to 90 dpi, whereas that of dendritic clusters remained constant during the same period (one-way ANOVA; cell body, $F_{(3,8)} = 5.752, p = 0.0214$; apical dendrite, $F_{(3,8)} = 3.438, p = 0.07$). Surprisingly, in α2-FL mice, α2-subunit-positive clusters were still detectable on eGFP + cells at 7 and 14 dpi. However, a strong decrease was observed at 30 and 90 dpi in both the somatic and dendritic compartments (Fig. 1E; one-way ANOVA; cell body, $F_{(3,8)} = 5.677, p = 0.022$; apical dendrite, $F_{(3,8)} = 7.879, p = 0.009$). These results suggest that *Gabra2* is expressed early in adult-born GCs and that, after Cre-mediated inactivation, the loss of α2-subunit is a protracted process that becomes detectable after 14 dpi.

We next verified whether the α3 subunit, which is also expressed in GCs (Fritschy and Mohler, 1995), is upregulated after *Gabra2* inactivation (Fig. 1D, F). At 90 dpi, there was no difference in α3-subunit cluster density in GCs of α2-FL and WT mice (cell body, $t_{(3)} = 1.147, p = 0.315$; apical dendrite, $t_{(3)} = 0.284, p = 0.790$), suggesting that deletion of the α2-subunit is not
<table><caption>**Table 4. Properties of postsynaptic currents**</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>dpi</th><th>WT</th><th>α2-FL</th><th>t test</th><th>MW test</th><th>Dunn's test</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="7"><strong>A, IPSCs</strong></td></tr><tr><td>eIPSC amplitude (pA)</td><td>7</td><td>56.86 ± 8.21 n = 11</td><td>41.15 ± 5.32 n = 13</td><td>0.113</td><td>0.132</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>14</td><td>111.80 ± 15.24 n = 15</td><td>46.60 ± 9.01N = 12</td><td>0.002</td><td>0.0059</td><td>**</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>30</td><td>155.70 ± 19.20 n = 12</td><td>51.04 ± 8.05 n = 18</td><td>***</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>90</td><td>186.01 ± 23.32 n = 13</td><td>33.78 ± 11.09 n = 13</td><td>***</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>One-way ANOVA</td><td></td><td>p = 0.0002<br>7 versus 14**; 7 versus 90***</td><td>p = 0.1627</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>sIPSC frequency (Hz)</td><td>7</td><td>0.06 ± 0.01 n = 9</td><td>0.05 ± 0.01 n = 12</td><td>0.452</td><td>0.546</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>14</td><td>0.12 ± 0.03 n = 11</td><td>0.05 ± 0.01 n = 7</td><td>0.037</td><td>0.0774</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>30</td><td>0.10 ± 0.02 n = 15</td><td>0.04 ± 0.01 n = 17</td><td>0.0041</td><td>0.0034</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>90</td><td>0.24 ± 0.07 n = 15</td><td>0.05 ± 0.02 n = 7</td><td>0.068</td><td>0.0048</td><td>**</td></tr><tr><td>One-way ANOVA</td><td></td><td>p = 0.031<br>7 versus 90*</td><td>p = 0.1627</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>sIPSC amplitude (pA)</td><td>7</td><td>16.30 ± 2.34 n = 9</td><td>11.48 ± 0.98 n = 8</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.074</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>14</td><td>19.17 ± 1.94 n = 12</td><td>12.57 ± 0.90 n = 9</td><td>0.0124</td><td>0.0062</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>30</td><td>23.46 ± 1.48 n = 14</td><td>13.93 ± 1.04 n = 13</td><td>***</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>90</td><td>22.90 ± 1.54 n = 13</td><td>13.81 ± 1.76 n = 5</td><td>0.0043</td><td>0.0078</td><td>**</td></tr><tr><td>One-way ANOVA</td><td></td><td>p = 0.220</td><td>p = 0.537</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>sIPSC decay time constant (ms)</td><td>7</td><td>29.29 ± 3.97 n = 7</td><td>44.27 ± 5.53 n = 6</td><td>0.0463</td><td>0.0734</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>14</td><td>28.15 ± 2.73 n = 12</td><td>53.49 ± 12.90 n = 7</td><td>0.0249</td><td>0.09</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>30</td><td>33.73 ± 3.30 n = 14</td><td>54.98 ± 10.33 n = 9</td><td>0.0305</td><td>0.0298</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>90</td><td>27.02 ± 3.242 n = 13</td><td>52.67 ± 5.47 n = 3</td><td>0.0035</td><td>0.0222</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>One-way ANOVA</td><td></td><td>p = 0.438</td><td>p = 0.889</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>sIPSC rise time 20–80% (ms)</td><td>7</td><td>0.59 ± 0.05 n = 7</td><td>0.82 ± 0.06 n = 6</td><td>0.012</td><td>0.008</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>14</td><td>0.78 ± 0.07 n = 12</td><td>0.95 ± 0.08 n = 7</td><td>0.119</td><td>0.139</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>30</td><td>0.68 ± 0.07 n = 14</td><td>0.70 ± 0.04 n = 9</td><td>0.815</td><td>0.378</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>90</td><td>0.64 ± 0.04 n = 13</td><td>0.62 ± 0.15 n = 4</td><td>0.841</td><td>0.533</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>One-way ANOVA</td><td></td><td>p = 0.28</td><td>p = 0.0263</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><strong>B, EPSCs</strong></td></tr><tr><td>sEPSC frequency (Hz)</td><td>7</td><td>1.14 ± 0.74 n = 11</td><td>1.12 ± 0.27 n = 11</td><td>0.653</td><td>0.5546</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>14</td><td>4.43 ± 0.82 n = 12</td><td>1.78 ± 0.58 n = 11</td><td>0.0175</td><td>0.0151</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>30</td><td>5.42 ± 0.94 n = 12</td><td>3.13 ± 0.52 n = 19</td><td>0.028*</td><td>0.0744</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>90</td><td>3.87 ± 0.68 n = 11</td><td>2.21 ± 0.67 n = 16</td><td>0.1051</td><td>0.0543</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>One-way ANOVA</td><td></td><td>p = 0.021<br>7 versus 14*; 7 versus 30**</td><td>p = 0.126</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>sEPSC amplitude (pA)</td><td>7</td><td>8.88 ± 0.91 n = 11</td><td>8.35 ± 1.10 n = 11</td><td>0.7147</td><td>0.4307</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>14</td><td>9.31 ± 1.36 n = 12</td><td>9.37 ± 0.62 n = 13</td><td>0.968</td><td>0.849</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>30</td><td>8.64 ± 0.84 n = 14</td><td>9.38 ± 0.88 n = 19</td><td>0.5561</td><td>0.392</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>90</td><td>7.26 ± 0.37 n = 12</td><td>8.33 ± 0.65 n = 14</td><td>0.1819</td><td>0.2077</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>One-way ANOVA</td><td></td><td>p = 0.583</td><td>p = 0.251</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>sEPSC decay time constant (ms)</td><td>7</td><td>7.58 ± 1.57 n = 11</td><td>9.57 ± 1.31 n = 10</td><td>0.3471</td><td>0.1698</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>14</td><td>9.61 ± 1.76 n = 13</td><td>8.69 ± 1.63 n = 13</td><td>0.7036</td><td>0.7976</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>30</td><td>9.46 ± 1.37 n = 14</td><td>10.79 ± 1.65 n = 19</td><td>0.5586</td><td>0.8698</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>90</td><td>12.16 ± 2.41 n = 11</td><td>8.36 ± 1.25 n = 16</td><td>0.1414</td><td>0.1671</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>One-way ANOVA</td><td></td><td>p = 0.2673</td><td>p = 0.718</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>sEPSC rise time 20–80% (ms)</td><td>7</td><td>1.03 ± 0.05 n = 11</td><td>0.98 ± 0.06 n = 15</td><td>0.5043</td><td>0.6037</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>14</td><td>0.90 ± 0.05 n = 13</td><td>0.82 ± 0.042 n = 16</td><td>0.2173</td><td>0.3131</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>30</td><td>0.83 ± 0.06 n = 14</td><td>0.78 ± 0.06 n = 19</td><td>0.5617</td><td>0.6229</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>90</td><td>0.87 ± 0.04 n = 12</td><td>0.98 ± 0.13 n = 16</td><td>0.506</td><td>0.9815</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>One-way ANOVA</td><td></td><td>p = 0.0775</td><td>p = 0.1314</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

Values are mean ± SEM. General statistics are presented in Table 3. Each genotype was analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunn's post hoc test (NS, *p* > 0.05; \* *p* < 0.05; \*\* *p* < 0.01; \*\*\* *p* < 0.001). WT and FL groups were compared two-by-two by Student's *t* test and Mann–Whitney *U* test (MW).

compensated by increased expression of the α3-subunit. We then analyzed how deletion of the α2-subunit affects GABAergic innervation of GCs. We first quantified postsynaptic gephyrin clusters (Fig. 1G,H) and found a significant decrease in GCs of α2-FL mice, in parallel with the depletion of the α2-subunit (one-way ANOVA; cell body, $F_{(3,8)} = 6.735, p = 0.014$; apical dendrite, $F_{(3,8)} = 7.472, p = 0.01$; for complete statistics, see Table 2). In contrast, there was no difference, at any time point, in the number of GAD65 + terminals impinging onto the cell body and the apical dendrite of eGFP + GCs (Fig. 1I,J; Table 2). These data indicate that GABAergic innervation of new GCs is maintained

after deletion of the α2-subunit despite the disruption of the postsynaptic gephyrin scaffold.

## Conditional deletion of *Gabra2* causes delayed decrease of GABAergic currents in adult-born GCs

To investigate the functional consequence of *Gabra2* inactivation, we performed whole-cell patch-clamp recordings on acute slices. Using a focal electrical stimulation delivered in the GCL (Fig. 2A), we recorded eIPSCs in adult-born GCs (Fig. 2B). Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of time and genotype and a significant interaction between these factors (for values and
<table><caption>**Table 5. Intrinsic membrane properties of newborn granule cells**</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>dpi</th><th>WT</th><th>α2-FL</th><th>t test</th><th>MW test</th><th>Dunn's test</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="4">C<sub>m</sub> (pF)</td><td>7</td><td>12.09 ± 1.42 n = 13</td><td>11.40 ± 0.89 n = 16</td><td>0.6727</td><td>0.8608</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>13.70 ± 0.86 n = 17</td><td>12.49 ± 0.80 n = 16</td><td>0.3148</td><td>0.3219</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>30</td><td>10.70 ± 0.74 n = 17</td><td>11.86 ± 0.85 n = 19</td><td>0.3188</td><td>0.2347</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>90</td><td>10.07 ± 0.91 n = 15</td><td>9.07 ± 0.61 n = 21</td><td>0.3487</td><td>0.4703</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">One-way ANOVA</td><td></td><td>p = 0.06</td><td>p = 0.0099<br>14 versus 90*</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>1.37 ± 0.14 n = 13</td><td>1.80 ± 0.28 n = 14</td><td>0.1992</td><td>0.6979</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">R<sub>m</sub> (GΩ)</td><td>14</td><td>0.79 ± 0.09 n = 16</td><td>0.76 ± 0.071 n = 16</td><td>0.8536</td><td>0.8358</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>30</td><td>0.73 ± 0.10 n = 16</td><td>0.80 ± 0.12 n = 17</td><td>0.6823</td><td>0.8712</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>90</td><td>0.67 ± 0.08 n = 14</td><td>0.90 ± 0.10 n = 16</td><td>0.0775</td><td>0.0504</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>p = 0.006<br>7 versus 14*; 7 versus 30**; 7 versus 90**</td><td>p = 0.0026<br>7 versus 14**; 7 versus 30**</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">iNa<sup>+</sup> (pA/pF)</td><td>7</td><td>87.08 ± 18.49 n = 12</td><td>93.68 ± 13.96 n = 16</td><td>0.7734</td><td>0.6260</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>141.0 ± 14.32 n = 17</td><td>146.1 ± 12.47 n = 16</td><td>0.7893</td><td>0.6787</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>30</td><td>179.2 ± 15.36 n = 17</td><td>168.4 ± 18.59 n = 19</td><td>0.6610</td><td>0.4661</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>90</td><td>174.6 ± 21.65 n = 11</td><td>158.5 ± 22.92 n = 17</td><td>0.6338</td><td>0.5409</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">One-way ANOVA</td><td></td><td>p = 0.0036<br>7 versus 30**; 7 versus 90*</td><td>p = 0.0192<br>7 versus 30*</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

C<sub>m</sub>, Membrane capacitance; R<sub>m</sub>, membrane resistance; iNa<sup>+</sup>, density of voltage-dependant Na<sup>+</sup> channels-mediated currents (normalized to C<sub>m</sub>). Values are mean ± SEM. General statistics are presented in Table 3. Each genotype was analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunn's post hoc test (NS, *p* > 0.05; \* *p* < 0.05; \*\* *p* < 0.01; \*\*\* *p* < 0.001). For a given time point, WT and α2-FL groups were compared two-by-two by Student's t test and Mann–Whitney U test (MW).

statistics, see Tables 3, 4A). In cells recorded from WT mice, we observed a significant increase in the amplitude of eIPSCs from 7 to 90 dpi (one-way ANOVA, *p* = 0.002), consistent with the progressive increase in α2-subunit and gephyrin clusters described above. However, the amplitude of eIPSCs remained constant in α2-FL mice, leading to a fivefold difference at 90 dpi when compared with WT (Fig. 2C; Table 4A). We next tested the consequences of ablation of the α2-subunit on the physiological properties of sIPSCs (Fig. 2D–H; Table 4A). Although there was no change over time in either genotype (two-way ANOVA; Table 3), the sIPSC amplitudes were significantly lower in α2-FL cells than in WT at all time points after 14 dpi (Fig. 2E; Table 4A). Concomitantly, the sIPSC frequency increased over time in WT cells but not in mutant GCs (one-way ANOVA, *p* = 0.031), reflecting the progressive increase in the number of functional synapses during unperturbed neuronal maturation (Fig. 2F). The decay time constants were longer in mutant cells (Fig. 2D, G), but the rise times remained unchanged (Fig. 2H; Tables 3, 4A). In contrast to these changes, we found no genotype effect on the membrane capacitance, input membrane resistance, and the Na<sup>+</sup> current density (Table 5). Thus, ablation of the α2-subunit led to a marked reduction in the functional properties of GABAergic synapses without changing the intrinsic membrane properties of newborn GCs. Collectively, these results are consistent with the immunohistochemical data showing an increased number of GABAergic synapses during the morphological maturation of GCs, a process that is dramatically altered in mutant cells. Inactivation of Gabra2 leads to the formation of adult-born GCs receiving fewer GABAergic inputs characterized by low amplitude and slow decay time constants. These alterations appear at ~14 dpi and become even more apparent at later time points.

## GC dendritic morphology is affected after Gabra2 inactivation

To determine whether the reduced afferent GABAergic signaling caused by conditional deletion of Gabra2 has an influence on the survival of newborn GCs, we measured the density of eGFP<sup>+</sup> cells at different time points after viral injection. We found that cell density did not differ between the two genotypes (i.e., at 90 dpi WT, 1350 ± 50 cells/mm<sup>2</sup>; α2-FL, 1200 ± 27 cells/mm<sup>2</sup>; unpaired t test, *p* = 0.676), indicating that deletion of the α2-

subunit does not affect GC survival. Moreover, the fraction of deep versus superficial GCs is not affected in α2-FL mice, as tested at 30 and 90 dpi (data not shown). However, double labeling for eGFP and doublecortin revealed that mutant GCs have a prolonged expression of doublecortin compared with control cells (30 dpi, 7.1 ± 0.9 and 19 ± 1.8% in WT and α2-FL mice, respectively; *n* = 688 and 394 cells; 90 dpi, 5 ± 0.1 and 11.1 ± 0.7% in WT and α2-FL mice; *n* = 710 and 564 cells). These results indicate that adult-born GCs lacking α2–GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs exhibit impaired structural maturation compared with WT counterparts.

We next asked whether the reduction in GABAergic inputs alters the dendritic arborization of newborn GCs. As expected for maturing cells, Sholl analysis of WT control cells revealed a progressive development of the dendritic tree, in particular in the distal portion starting ~100 µm away from the cell body (Fig. 3A). Calculating the total AUC (Fig. 3A), we observed a 44% increase between 7 and 30 dpi, followed by a significant reduction at 90 dpi (one-way ANOVA, F<sub>(3,8)</sub> = 30.07, *p* = 0.0001). This biphasic evolution suggests that the apical dendrite undergoes a prominent remodeling after an initial period of exuberant growth. In α2-FL mice, dendritic development beyond 14 dpi was altered compared with WT (Fig. 3B). The Sholl analysis revealed a slow increase of the AUC between 14 and 90 dpi, which reached significance only at later time points (Table 6). Likewise, analysis of the total dendritic length and the number of terminal branches revealed significant effects of genotype and time, as well as a strong interaction between both factors (two-way ANOVA; Table 7). Although these parameters increased significantly at 30 and 90 dpi in WT cells, there were only limited changes in GCs from α2-FL cells (Fig. 3C–E). Therefore, the dendritic growth of adult-born GCs is severely impaired during ablation of α2–GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs.

## Gabra2 inactivation causes rearrangements of glutamatergic synapses

To further describe how α2–GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs modulate GC differentiation and synaptic integration, we investigated whether excitatory synapses also change after Gabra2 inactivation. Quantification of spine density in the GCL and EPL (Fig. 4A–D) revealed highly significant effects of time and genotype, as well as a strong interaction between these factors (two-way ANOVA;
Table 7). In WT mice, spine density increased from 7 to 14 dpi, followed by a stabilization and decrease between 30 and 90 dpi (Fig. 4B,D). This transient peak in spine density is consistent with previous work (Whitman and Greer, 2007) and may be related to the critical window of activity-dependent plasticity that characterizes GC development (Kelsch et al., 2009; Nissant et al., 2009). A similar trend was seen in α2-FL mice, but the peak in spine density between 14 and 30 dpi was much less pronounced (Fig. 4B,D). Despite these changes in spine density, there were no obvious alterations in spine morphology, and spine neck length and head area were similar in α2-FL and WT mice (data not shown). These data indicate that the α2-subunit is necessary for exuberant spine growth, which are then pruned after 30 dpi.

We used antibodies against PSD95 to understand whether the lower spine density seen in mutant GCs is accompanied by a rearrangement of glutamatergic synapses (Fig. 4E,F). As seen at both 30 and 90 dpi, the number of PSD95 clusters located in spines was reduced in GCs of α2-FL mice, reflecting spine deficit (Fig. 4E; two-way ANOVA, $F_{(1,10)} = 1.028$; $p_{genotype} = 0.005$, $p_{time} = 0.334$, interaction = 0.582). In contrast, the density of PSD95 clusters located on dendritic shafts was significantly higher in mutant GCs than in WT; the difference was seen at both time points, although a reduction of these clusters occurs with time (Fig. 4E; two-way ANOVA, $F_{(1,10)} = 9.685$; $p_{genotype} = 0.007$, $p_{time} = 0.011$, interaction = 0.191). These observations suggest that deletion of α2–GABA~A~Rs in GCs causes glutamatergic synapses to persist on dendritic shafts. To confirm this possibility, we performed preembedding immunoelectron microscopy for eGFP and gephyrin on α2-FL mice at 90 dpi. This analysis revealed that mitral/tufted cell dendrites establish reciprocal synapses with eGFP~+~ profiles that lack the typical morphology of GC

spines, supporting the idea that the reduction of spine density in mutant GCs is concurrent with the persistence of excitatory synapses on the dendritic shaft (Fig. 4G,H).

Finally, we analyzed the properties of glutamatergic synapses in mutated GCs. For this, sEPSCs were recorded during a 5 min baseline period. Analysis of their frequency revealed a similar profile as spine density, with significant effects of time and genotype (for values and statistics, see Tables 3, 4B). At 14 and 30 dpi, α2-FL cells had significantly fewer sEPSCs compared with WT GCs (one-way ANOVA, *p* = 0.021; Fig. 4I,J), but their amplitude (one-way ANOVA, *p* = 0.583; Fig. 4K), decay kinetics (one-way ANOVA, *p* = 0.267; Fig. 4L), and rise time (one-way ANOVA, *p* = 0.08; data not shown) remained unchanged. Thus, we con-

clude that GCs lacking α2–GABA~A~Rs develop fewer glutamatergic synapses but without changes to their function.

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Morphometric analysis of apical dendrite arborization in newborn GCs of WT and α2-FL mice. A, Quantification by Sholl analysis of apical dendrites in eGFP~+~ cells of WT mice. The number of intersections between eGFP~+~ dendritic segments and virtual concentric lines centered on the soma and spaced by 10 µm is displayed graphically. Each curve represents an individual time point after virus injection. For comparison between different time points, the AUC was calculated and analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA with *post hoc* tests (*p* < 0.05, **p** < 0.01, ***p* < 0.001). B, Sholl analysis comparison between WT (gray line) and α2-FL (red line) mice illustrating the reduction in dendritic complexity in newborn GCs from α2-FL mice. Most differences occur in the EPL (>100 µm from the soma) and are most pronounced at 30 dpi. For statistical comparison between genotypes, the corresponding AUC was calculated in each graph (for mean values and statistical results, see Table 6). C, Representative drawings of eGFP~+~ cells in WT and α2-FL mice used for Sholl analysis at 14 and 90 dpi. D, E, Histograms of the total apical dendrite length and number of terminal branches (mean ± SEM) in WT and α2-FL mice (one-way ANOVA with *post hoc* tests; for statistical analysis, see Table 7; *p* < 0.05).</figcaption></figure>

## Gabra2 inactivation in GCs occludes the effect of sensory deprivation on spine density

We examined the putative role of α2–GABA~A~Rs in activity-dependent regulation of structural plasticity by challenging the sensory inputs to the OB circuit. We used both olfactory enrichment and dichlobenil-mediated sensory deprivation to study the adaptability of adult-born GCs to their novel neuronal environment. Mice were exposed to the enriched environment or injected with dichlobenil at 7 dpi and were killed at 30 dpi (Fig. 5A). Two-way ANOVA analysis revealed significant
<table><caption>**Table 6. Statistical analysis of dendrite morphology: Scholl analysis**</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Genotype</th><th rowspan="2">N</th><th colspan="3">AUC</th></tr><tr><th>Mean ± SD</th><th>t</th><th>p</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7 dpi</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>WT</td><td>3</td><td>233 ± 16</td><td rowspan="2">t<sub>(4)</sub> = 0.412</td><td rowspan="2">NS</td></tr><tr><td>α2-FL</td><td>3</td><td>224 ± 12</td></tr><tr><td>14 dpi</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>WT</td><td>3</td><td>237 ± 19</td><td rowspan="2">t<sub>(4)</sub> = 0.172</td><td rowspan="2">NS</td></tr><tr><td>α2-FL</td><td>3</td><td>240 ± 7</td></tr><tr><td>30 dpi</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>WT</td><td>3</td><td>410 ± 22</td><td rowspan="2">t<sub>(4)</sub> = 3.748</td><td rowspan="2">0.02</td></tr><tr><td>α2-FL</td><td>3</td><td>262 ± 32</td></tr><tr><td>90 dpi</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>WT</td><td>3</td><td>385 ± 7</td><td rowspan="2">t<sub>(4)</sub> = 6.954</td><td rowspan="2">0.002</td></tr><tr><td>α2-FL</td><td>3</td><td>289 ± 12</td></tr></tbody></table>

Pairwise comparison was performed by unpaired Student's t test.

<table><caption>**Table 7. Statistical analysis of dendrite morphology: dendrite topology and spine density**</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Two-way ANOVA</th><th>p<sub>genotype</sub></th><th>p<sub>time</sub></th><th>Interaction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GCL spine density</td><td>F<sub>(4,20)</sub> = 9.164</td><td>0.000</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>0.000</td></tr><tr><td>EPL spine density</td><td>F<sub>(3,16)</sub> = 5.542</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>0.01</td></tr><tr><td>Number of terminal branches</td><td>F<sub>(3,16)</sub> = 5.887</td><td>0.0001</td><td>0.0009</td><td>0.007</td></tr><tr><td>Total dendritic tree length</td><td>F<sub>(3,16)</sub> = 1.506</td><td>0.003</td><td>&lt;0.0001</td><td>0.251</td></tr></tbody></table>

Differences in dendrite topology and spine densities were analyzed further by one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunn's post hoc test for each genotype (see Results).

effects of genotype (p = 0.001) and treatment (p < 0.0001), as well as a significant interaction (F(2,12) = 6.38, p = 0.013). In WT mice, odor enrichment caused a small increase in spine density that did not reach statistical significance, whereas olfactory deprivation caused a marked reduction in the density of spines (p < 0.001; Fig. 5B, C). In contrast, in α2-FL mice, neither enrichment nor sensory deafferentation caused significant changes in the density of spines. This indicates that inhibitory synaptic transmission mediated by α2-GABAARs is required for structural adaptations of newborn GCs triggered by sensory enrichment or deprivation during the phase of dendritic/spine exuberance.

### Effects of early ablation of Gabra2 in progenitor neural cells

In the α2-FL model, deletion of the α2-subunit is complete only after GCs have reached the OB and started to establish synaptic connections within the preexisting network. We devised a complementary approach to inactivate Gabra2 in neural precursor cells of adult mice, before their final mitotic division and migration to the OB. This was achieved by crossing α2-FL mice with mice expressing an inducible form of Cre (Cre-ERT2) under the control of the GLAST promoter (Mori et al., 2006). At the age of 8 weeks, mice were treated systemically with Tam or Oil, and, 4 weeks later, they were injected stereotaxically with a lentiviral vector encoding eGFP (Fig. 6A). Adult-born GCs were investigated morphologically and functionally at 7 and 90 dpi.

Quantification of the number of eGFP+ cells in the GCL showed no difference in mice injected with Tam or Oil at 7 dpi (Oil, 527 ± 159 cells/mm²; Tam, 414 ± 36 cells/mm²; unpaired t test, t(4) = 0.694, p = 0.525) and at 90 dpi (Oil, 780 ± 27 cells/mm²; Tam, 647 ± 143 cells/mm²; unpaired t test, t(4) = 0.915, p = 0.412). We then analyzed the density of α2-subunit clusters on the cell body and the apical dendrite of eGFP+ cells. We found a strong decrease in cluster density in Tam-injected mice compared with the control group already

at 7 dpi (cell body, t(4) = 6.119, p = 0.0036; apical dendrite, t(4) = 15.01, p < 0.0001; Fig. 6B, C). Similarly, we observed a decreased density of gephyrin clusters in the proximal portion of the apical dendrite of Tam mice (Oil, 0.169 ± 0.016 clusters/µm; Tam, 0.080 ± 0.016 clusters/µm; t(4) = 3.871, p = 0.018). Triple-immunofluorescence staining confirmed that these remaining gephyrin clusters were colocalized with the α3-subunit (data not shown). Accordingly, the density of α3/gephyrin clusters was similar in both groups (Fig. 6D) in the cell body (t(4) = 1.186, p = 0.30) and in the apical dendrite (t(4) = 0.381, p = 0.72), indicating that no compensation occurs, as in α2-FL mice.

We then investigated whether this early deletion of the α2-subunit impairs dendritic development similar to the situation in α2-FL mice. Measurements from eGFP+ cells in Tam-injected mice showed reduced dendritic branching (Fig. 6E), with the number of terminal branches being significantly lower already at 7 dpi (Fig. 6F; t(4) = 5.712, p = 0.0046), a defect that persisted until 90 dpi (Fig. 6F; t(4) = 5.129, p = 0.0068). This reduction was also reflected in the Sholl analysis made at 90 dpi, revealing significantly reduced AUC (Fig. 6G; Oil, 366 ± 7.7; Tam, 289 ± 11.8; t(4) = 6.895, p = 0.002), particularly at the 100–250 µm portion from the soma. Spine density was also significantly decreased in Tam-treated mice at 7 dpi (Fig. 6H), and this defect persisted at 90 dpi (7 dpi, t(4) = 11.44, p = 0.0003; 90 dpi, t(4) = 7.74, p = 0.0015; Fig. 6I, J). The reduced spine density was accompanied by a decreased number of PSD95 clusters in spines (t(4) = 12.02, p = 0.0003; Fig. 6J, K). However, in contrast with α2-FL mice, we did not observe an increase in the density of PSD95 clusters along dendritic profiles. These data indicate that early depletion of the α2-subunit accelerates developmental alterations in newborn GCs but eventually results in structural defects that primarily overlap with those seen in α2-FL mice.

### Discussion

In this study, we show that functional α2-GABAARs are required for proper structural development of adult-born GCs and for the onset of sensory-dependent structural plasticity. Major deficits of GCs lacking α2-GABAARs include the absence of spine/dendrite overproduction ~30 dpi, persistence of glutamatergic synapses on the dendritic shaft, and an inability to adjust their morphology to sensory challenges. Similar observations were made when Gabra2 was inactivated early in neural stem cells or later in migrating neuroblasts. Our work demonstrates that early GABAergic synaptic transmission is an important determinant for the development and function of adult-generated OB interneurons.

### Specificity and efficiency of α2-subunit deletion of GABAARs

Adult-born GCs express GABAARs early in development and are responsive to GABAergic signals already in the neurogenic zone and in the RMS (Platel et al., 2008). Sixteen GABAAR subunits are expressed in a time- and location-specific manner in the developing and adult brain (Laurie et al., 1992; Fritschy and Brünig, 2003). Because GABAAR subtypes have unique functional properties, they may differentially regulate distinct steps of adult neurogenesis (Duveau et al., 2011). In the SVZ–OB system, multiple GABAAR subunits have been detected in neonatal neuroblasts (Stewart et al., 2002) and polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule-positive progenitors derived from neurospheres (Nguyen et al., 2003). Adult GCs also express distinct GABAARs mediating tonic and phasic inhibition. Here, we focused on α2-
GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs, which represent the majority of postsynaptic receptors expressed in GCs and are absent from mitral and tufted cells (Panzanelli et al., 2009). We silenced these receptors by two means. We injected a Cre-eGFP-encoding lentivirus into the RMS of adult α2-FL mice, and we used an eGFP-encoding lentivirus in GLAST::creERT2<sup>+/−</sup> mice previously treated with Tam. We found that deletion of the α2-subunit occurs ≥3 weeks after injection of the lentiviral vector. Therefore, in the first model (i.e., α2-FL mice), α2-GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs were removed only after newly formed GCs had already reached the OB, thus avoiding potential compensatory mechanisms that could take place during earlier development. In the second approach, α2-GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs were deleted in adult neural stem cells (i.e., GLAST<sup>+</sup> cells) before their final neuronal commitment. Remarkably, most of the observations made with the first model were validated by the second approach, thus ruling out any potential bias attributable to early GABAergic signaling that was preserved in developing GCs of α2-FL mice. It is also worth noting that, in both genetic models, the dramatic reduction of α2-GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs was not compensated by the α3-subunit, resulting in a severe reduction of the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous synaptic GABAergic events. As expected, however, the strongly decreased expression of GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs correlated with reduced amplitude and frequency of spontaneous synaptic GABAergic events. These functional alterations were evident already at 14 dpi, preceding the loss of α2-subunit or gephyrin clusters seen morphologically. This discrepancy may reflect the greater sensitivity of electrophysiological analysis, probing not only synapse density but also the number of receptors active in each synapse and their functional properties. In addition, because the rise time of sIPSCs was unchanged after deleting the α2-subunit, we conclude that the downregulation of GABAergic currents is homogeneous between the somatic and dendritic compartments. The currents that remain in GCs of α2-FL mice have a kinetic profile consistent with GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs containing the α3-subunit (Schofield et al., 2009). Notably, these small and slow currents were not sufficient to rescue the maturation of newborn GCs.

Despite these postsynaptic alterations and the loss of gephyrin clusters caused by *Gabra2* inactivation, innervation by GABAergic terminals was not visibly affected. This finding is in line with previous studies showing that postsynaptic GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs are not essential for inhibitory synaptogenesis (Panzanelli et al., 2011). Finally, in both experimental settings, *Gabra2* inactivation did not affect GC survival (as assessed by quantifying the number of eGFP<sup>+</sup> cells in the GCL),

<caption>**Figure 4.** Altered excitatory inputs in newborn GCs from α2-FL mice. **A, C,** Representative images of dendritic spines on the apical dendrites of eGFP<sup>+</sup> cells of WT and α2-FL mice in the GCL (**A**) and EPL (**C**) at 30 and 90 dpi. **B, D,** Quantification of spine density (mean ± SEM) on apical dendrites in the GCL (**B**) and EPL (**D**); one-way ANOVA with *post hoc* tests (*p* < 0.05; for general statistical analysis, see Table 7). **E,** Quantification of PSD95 clusters colocalized with eGFP on the spines and shaft of apical dendrites at 30 and 90 dpi in the EPL (mean ± SEM; *p* < 0.05, Bonferroni's *post hoc* test). **F,** Images (3-D projection) depicting PSD95-immunoreactive clusters (red) on eGFP<sup>+</sup> spine-like structures and dendritic shafts in the EPL at 90 dpi in WT and α2-FL mice; colocalization is depicted in yellow (arrowheads). **G, H,** Double immunoelectron microscopy for gephyrin (silver grains, arrowheads) and eGFP (*) in eGFP<sup>+</sup> GCs of α2-FL mice. Each pair of serial sections depicts an asymmetric (excitatory) synapse (arrow) formed by a mitral cell dendritic profile on an eGFP<sup>+</sup> GC dendrite profile, which in turn makes a gephyrin-positive (arrowhead) symmetric synapse on the same mitral cell profile. The crossed arrows in **H** point to an asymmetric synapse onto an eGFP<sup>−</sup> spine profile. **I,** Representative traces of sEPSCs recorded at −70 mV at 14 dpi. **J–L,** Histograms of sEPSC frequency (hertz) (**J**), amplitude (picoamperes) (**K**), and decay time constant (milliseconds) (**L**) in GCs from WT and α2-FL mice (mean ± SD). For statistical analysis, see Tables 3 and 4 **B**; WT and α2-FL groups were compared by one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni's *post hoc* tests (*p* < 0.05; **p* < 0.01). Scale bars: **A, C**, 5 µm; **F, J**, 2 µm; **G, H**, 0.2 µm.</caption>

indicating that functional GABAergic synapses are dispensable for long-term survival of adult-born GCs.

### Impaired dendritic and synaptic development in GCs with decreased GABAergic input

GABA is considered as a key actor at early stages of adult neurogenesis. In the SVZ, it reduces the number of proliferative neural

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_18.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Effects of sensory stimulation and deprivation on spine development in new-born GCs. A, Schematic diagram of the experimental protocol used for olfactory enrichment or deprivation. Adult mice were injected in the SVZ with the Cre-eGFP lentivirus. One week after virus injection, mice were either exposed to enriched olfactory stimuli for 3 weeks or injected with dichlobenil for sensory deprivation. B, Representative images of eGFP+ spines on apical dendrites of newborn GCs in enriched (top row) and deprived (bottom row) WT and α2-FL mice. C, Quantification of spine density (mean ± SEM) in the EPL of deprived and enriched mice (one-way ANOVA with *post hoc* tests; for statistical analysis, see Results; **p** < 0.01). Scale bar, 2 µm.</figcaption></figure>

stem cells via tonic activation of GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs (Liu et al., 2005). Similarly, GABAergic signaling controls neuroblast migration in the RMS via paracrine effects (Bolteus and Bordey, 2004; Ge et al., 2006; Platel et al., 2008). These early functions demonstrate that GABA spillover might provide important information to neural stem cells and migrating progenitors about the size of the population of neuroblasts already formed (Platel et al., 2007). However, although GABA controls these early developmental stages, the function of GABAergic signaling on the ensuing maturation of GCs has remained elusive.

We show here that reducing synaptic transmission mediated by α2-GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs in developing GCs has detrimental effects on their structural maturation. Specifically, postsynaptic GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs are required to control dendritic growth and spine formation after GCs have reached their final destination in the OB. During their maturation, adult-born GCs receive synaptic inputs from several distinct glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons (Whitman and Greer, 2009; Kelsch et al., 2010; Nissant and Pallotto, 2011). Furthermore, GC maturation is characterized by an initial overproduction of spines and glutamatergic synapses, followed by a phase of synaptic pruning (Whitman and Greer, 2007), likely corresponding to a phase of maturation during which synapses are refined by activity-dependent mechanisms. Strikingly, this window of increased plasticity was suppressed in newborn GCs lacking the

α2-subunit, in which dendritic length and spine density remained constant during the entire developmental period. Therefore, functional α2-GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs at afferent GABAergic synapses are essential for proper synaptic integration of adult-born GCs. This conclusion supports another study showing that blockade of GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs triggered a rapid stabilization of new dendritic segments in acute OB slices (Gascon et al., 2006). Of particular interest is the fact that the reduced spinnogenesis in mutant GCs was accompanied by a persistence of PSD95 clusters on dendritic shafts up to 90 dpi. We showed previously in WT mice that dendro-dendritic synapses initially form on the shaft of GC dendrites, before being transferred to spines (Panzanelli et al., 2009). Our present results indicate that this morphological rearrangement is disrupted in mutant GCs, most likely reflecting an intrinsic deficit in spine formation.

The mechanisms by which GABA<sub>A</sub>R activation contributes to regulate dendritic development and glutamatergic synaptogenesis are unclear. One possibility is that GABAergic transmission is linked to signaling cascades controlling multiple aspects of neuronal development. Indeed, in the dentate gyrus, GABA supports neuronal maturation by increasing the expression of transcription factors and by regulating CREB-dependent transcriptional events (Tozuka et al., 2005). At the dendritic level, GABAergic activity may be essential for regulating local activity patterns and calcium transients that are involved in the stabilization and maturation of axo-dendritic contacts in hippocampal neurons (Lohmann and Bonhoeffer, 2008).

The present results also reveal apparent differences in the role of α2-GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs during maturation of adult-born GCs in the OB and in the dentate gyrus (Duveau et al., 2011). In the latter study, analysis of both global *Gabra2* inactivation and single-cell deletion with Cre<sup>+</sup> viruses demonstrated normal initial dendritic growth and spine formation, followed by excessive dendritic pruning in 4- to 6-week-old cells. This dendritic pruning was prevented by pharmacologically reducing glutamatergic synaptogenesis, suggesting that it either was a homeostatic mechanism to preserve inhibitory-excitatory balance in newborn neurons or it was a consequence of activity-dependent dendritic development. This phenotype is relatively mild compared with the one reported here in OB GCs and likely reflects the fact that α1-GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs are primarily preserved in the dentate gyrus during *Gabra2* inactivation, implying a less dramatic impairment of postsynaptic GABAergic function. These studies collectively indicate that functional α2-GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs are required for normal structural development and functional maturation of adult-born neurons in the brain.

## Absence of activity-dependent regulation in new neurons lacking GABAergic input

Our study supports an important role of GABAergic synaptic transmission for the activity-dependent selection of synaptic connectivity that occurs during a critical window of maturing GCs (Lledo and Gheusi, 2003). Because the OB circuit is only one synapse away from the external world, we sought to examine the potential role for GABA in mediating circuit remodeling induced by sensory experience (Saghatelyan et al., 2005). When challenging the degree of sensory inputs to the OB, we found that neither sensory enrichment nor sensory deafferentation caused significant changes in spine density in GCs lacking α2-GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs. This observation indicates that functional afferent GABAergic synaptic transmission is required for structural adaptations occurring in adult-born GCs
<figure><img src="image_19.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Effects of early inactivation of Gabra2 in progenitor cells. A, Schematic diagram of the experimental design: 8-week-old GLAST mice were injected with Tam or Oil once a day for 5 d. At 12 weeks of age, mice were injected with the eGFP lentivirus in the SVZ; they were then analyzed at 7 or 90 dpi. B, Representative images (3-D projections) showing α2-subunit clusters (red) in newborn GCs of GLAST mice (Oil- and Tam-injected) after 7 dpi, confirmed by colocalization analysis (yellow; arrowheads). Note the loss of α2-subunit clusters in eGFP + cells of Tam-injected mice. C, Quantification of α2-subunit clusters (mean ± SEM) in Tam-injected (green) and Oil-injected (gray) mice at 7 dpi in cell body and in the apical dendrite. D, Quantification of α3-subunit and gephyrin clusters (mean ± SEM) in the cell body and apical dendrite of Tam-injected (green) and Oil-injected (gray) mice at 7 dpi, as determined by triple fluorescence staining. There was no significant difference in the density of α3-subunit clusters colocalized with gephyrin (α3/geph) in either compartment. E, Representative drawings of eGFP + cells used for Sholl analysis in Oil-injected (gray) and Tam-injected (green) GLAST mice. F, Histogram of the number of terminal dendritic branches (mean ± SEM) showing a reduction at 7 and 90 dpi in Tam-injected mice. G, Sholl analysis comparison between Oil-injected mice (gray line) and Tam-injected mice (green line) at 7 dpi illustrating the reduced dendritic complexity in Tam mice. H, Representative images of eGFP + dendritic spines in the EPL of Oil- and Tam-injected mice at 7 and 90 dpi. I, J, Histograms of spine density in the EPL (mean ± SEM) at 7 and 90 dpi and PSD95 cluster density on spines and dendritic shafts (clusters per micrometer of dendrite). The decrease of spines correlates with that of PSD95 clusters in Tam-injected mice. Two-tailed Student's t test; \*p < 0.05. K, Immunofluorescence staining for PSD95 clusters (red) colocalized with eGFP + spine-like structures and dendritic shafts in the EPL after 7 dpi in Oil-injected control and Tam-injected mice; arrowheads point to sites of colocalization (yellow). Scale bars: B, 10 µm; H, 2 µm; I, 1 µm.</figcaption></figure>

as a response to sensory stimulation during the phase of dendritic/spine exuberance. Therefore, GABAergic transmission in adult-generated GCs may set appropriate levels of local inhibition to support a critical period of plasticity, as also shown in other sensory systems (Hensch, 2005). Additional studies will have to explore whether the crucial contribution of α2-GABA~A~Rs to activity-dependent plasticity depends on the depolarizing or hyperpolarizing action of GABA.

## References

Alonso M, Ortega-Pérez I, Grubb MS, Bourgeois JP, Charneau P, Lledo PM (2008) Turning astrocytes from the rostral migratory stream into neurons: a role for the olfactory sensory organ. J Neurosci 28: 11089–11102.

Altman J (1969) Autoradiographic and histological studies of postnatal neurogenesis. IV. Cell proliferation and migration in the anterior fore-brain, with special reference to persisting neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol 137:433–457.
Alvarez-Buylla A, Garcia-Verdugo JM (2002) Neurogenesis in adult sub-ventricular zone. *J Neurosci* 22:629–634.

Bolteus AJ, Bordey A (2004) GABA release and uptake regulate neuronal precursor migration in the postnatal subventricular zone. *J Neurosci* 24:7623–7631.

Chang YC, Gottlieb DI (1988) Characterization of the proteins purified with monoclonal antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase. *J Neurosci* 8:2123–2130.

Duveau V, Laustela S, Barth L, Gianolini F, Vogt KE, Keist R, Chandra D, Homanics GE, Rudolph U, Fritschy JM (2011) Spatiotemporal specificity of GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor-mediated regulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. *Eur J Neurosci* 34:362–373.

Fritschy JM, Brünig I (2003) Formation and plasticity of GABAergic synapses: physiological mechanisms and pathophysiological implications. *Pharmacol Ther* 98:299–323.

Fritschy JM, Mohler H (1995) GABA<sub>A</sub>-receptor heterogeneity in the adult rat brain: differential regional and cellular distribution of seven major subunits. *J Comp Neurol* 359:154–194.

Gascon E, Dayer AG, Sauvain MO, Potter G, Jenny B, De Roo M, Zgraggen E, Demaurex N, Muller D, Kiss JZ (2006) GABA regulates dendritic growth by stabilizing lamellipodia in newly generated interneurons of the olfactory bulb. *J Neurosci* 26:12956–12966.

Ge S, Goh EL, Sailor KA, Kitabatake Y, Ming GL, Song H (2006) GABA regulates synaptic integration of newly generated neurons in the adult brain. *Nature* 439:589–593.

Grubb MS, Nissant A, Murray K, Lledo PM (2008) Functional maturation of the first synapse in olfaction: development and adult neurogenesis. *J Neurosci* 28:2919–2932.

Hensch TK (2005) Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. *Nat Rev Neurosci* 6:877–888.

Holderith NB, Shigemoto R, Nusser Z (2003) Cell type-dependent expression of HCN1 in the main olfactory bulb. *Eur J Neurosci* 18:344–354.

Katagiri H, Pallotto M, Nissant A, Murray K, Sassoè-Pognetto M, Lledo PM (2011) Dynamic development of the first synapse impinging on adult-born olfactory neurons. *Neural Syst Circuits* 1:6.

Kelsch W, Lin CW, Lois C (2008) Sequential development of synapses in dendritic domains during adult neurogenesis. *Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A* 105:16803–16808.

Kelsch W, Lin CW, Mosley CP, Lois C (2009) A critical period for activity-dependent synaptic development during olfactory bulb adult neurogenesis. *J Neurosci* 29:11852–11858.

Kelsch W, Sim S, Lois C (2010) Watching synaptogenesis in the adult brain. *Annu Rev Neurosci* 33:131–149.

Kempermann G, Jessberger S, Steiner B, Kronenberg G (2004) Milestones of neuronal development in the adult hippocampus. *Trends Neurosci* 27:447–452.

Kollo M, Holderith N, Antal M, Nusser Z (2008) Unique clustering of A-type potassium channels on different cell types of the main olfactory bulb. *Eur J Neurosci* 27:1686–1699.

Laurie DJ, Wisden W, Seeburg PH (1992) The distribution of thirteen GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor subunit mRNAs in the rat brain. III. Embryonic and postnatal development. *J Neurosci* 12:4151–4172.

Liu X, Wang Q, Haydar TF, Bordey A (2005) Nonsynaptic GABA signaling in postnatal subventricular zone controls proliferation on GFAP-expressing progenitors. *Nat Neurosci* 8:1179–1187.

Lledo PM, Gheusi G (2003) Olfactory processing in a changing brain. *Neuroreport* 14:1655–1663.

Lledo PM, Alonso M, Grubb MS (2006) Adult neurogenesis and functional plasticity in neuronal circuits. *Nat Rev Neurosci* 7:179–193.

Lohmann C, Bonhoeffer T (2008) A role for local calcium signaling in rapid synaptic partner selection by dendritic filopodia. *Neuron* 59:253–260.

Ming GL, Song H (2011) Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain: significant answers and significant questions. *Neuron* 70:687–702.

Mori T, Tanaka K, Buffo A, Wurst W, Kühn R, Götz M (2006) Inducible gene deletion in astroglia and radial glia—a valuable tool for functional and lineage analysis. *Glia* 54:21–34.

Nguyen L, Malgrange B, Breuskin I, Bettendorff L, Moonen G, Belachew S,

Rigo JM (2003) Autocrine/paracrine activation of the GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor inhibits the proliferation of neurogenic polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule-positive (PSA-NCAM<sup>+</sup>) precursor cells from postnatal striatum. *J Neurosci* 23:3278–3294.

Nissant A, Pallotto M (2011) Integration and maturation of newborn neurons in the adult olfactory bulb—from synapses to function. *Eur J Neurosci* 33:1069–1077.

Nissant A, Bardy C, Katagiri H, Murray K, Lledo PM (2009) Adult neurogenesis promotes synaptic plasticity in the olfactory bulb. *Nat Neurosci* 12:728–730.

Panzanelli P, Bardy C, Nissant A, Pallotto M, Sassoè-Pognetto M, Lledo PM, Fritschy JM (2009) Early synapse formation in developing interneurons of the adult olfactory bulb. *J Neurosci* 29:15039–15052.

Panzanelli P, Gunn BG, Schlatter MC, Benke D, Tyagarajan SK, Scheiffele P, Beledi D, Lambert JJ, Rudolph U, Fritschy JM (2011) Distinct mechanisms regulate GABAA receptor and gephyrin clustering at perisomatic and axoaxonic synapses on CA1 pyramidal cells. *J Physiol* 589:4959–4980.

Platel JC, Lacar B, Bordey A (2007) GABA and glutamate signaling: homeostatic control of adult forebrain neurogenesis. *J Mol Histol* 38:602–610.

Platel JC, Dave KA, Bordey A (2008) Control of neuroblast production and migration by converging GABA and glutamate signals in the postnatal forebrain. *J Physiol* 586:3739–3743.

Rochefort C, Gheusi G, Vincent JD, Lledo PM (2002) Enriched odor exposure increases the number of newborn neurons in the adult olfactory bulb and improves odor memory. *J Neurosci* 22:2679–2689.

Saghatelyan A, Roux P, Migliore M, Rochefort C, Desmaisons D, Charneau P, Shepherd GM, Lledo PM (2005) Activity-dependent adjustments of the inhibitory network in the olfactory bulb following early postnatal deprivation. *Neuron* 46:103–116.

Schneider Gasser EM, Straub CJ, Panzanelli P, Weinmann O, Sassoè-Pognetto M, Fritschy JM (2006) Immunofluorescence in brain sections: simultaneous detection of presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins in identified neurons. *Nat Protoc* 1:1887–1897.

Schofield CM, Kleiman-Weiner M, Rudolph U, Huguenard JR (2009) A gain in GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor synaptic strength in thalamus reduces oscillatory activity and absence seizures. *Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A* 106:7630–7635.

Shepherd GM, Chen WR, Willhite D, Migliore M, Greer CA (2007) The olfactory granule cell: from classical enigma to central role in olfactory processing. *Brain Res Rev* 55:373–382.

Stewart RR, Hoge GJ, Zigova T, Luskin MB (2002) Neural progenitor cells of the neonatal rat anterior subventricular zone express functional GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors. *J Neurobiol* 50:305–322.

Stone D, Grillo M, Margolis F, Joh T, Baker H (1991) Differential effect of functional olfactory bulb deafferentation on tyrosine hydroxylase and glutamic acid decarboxylase messenger RNA levels in rodent juxtaglomerular neurons. *J Comp Neurol* 311:223–233.

Tozuka Y, Fukuda S, Namba T, Seki T, Hisatsune T (2005) GABAergic excitation promotes neuronal differentiation in adult hippocampal progenitor cells. *Neuron* 47:803–815.

Vedin V, Slotnick B, Berghard A (2004) Zonal ablation of the olfactory sensory neuroepithelium of the mouse: effects on odorant detection. *Eur J Neurosci* 20:1858–1864.

Waclaw RR, Allen ZJ 2nd, Bell SM, Erdélyi F, Szabó G, Potter SS, Campbell K (2006) The zinc finger transcription factor Sp8 regulates the generation and diversity of olfactory bulb interneurons. *Neuron* 49:503–516.

Whitman MC, Greer CA (2007) Synaptic integration of adult-generated olfactory bulb granule cells: basal axodendritic centrifugal input precedes apical dendrodendritic local circuits. *J Neurosci* 27:9951–9961.

Whitman MC, Greer CA (2009) Adult neurogenesis and the olfactory system. *Prog Neurobiol* 89:162–175.

Witschi R, Punnakkal P, Paul J, Walczak JS, Cervero F, Fritschy JM, Kuner R, Keist R, Rudolph U, Zeilhofer HU (2011) Presynaptic α2-GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors in primary afferent depolarization and spinal pain control. *J Neurosci* 31:8134–8142.

Yamaguchi M, Mori K (2005) Critical period for sensory experience-dependent survival of newly generated granule cells in the adult mouse olfactory bulb. *Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A* 102:9697–9702.