# Reply to: 'Flooding is a key driver of the Tonle Sap dai fishery in Cambodia'

Gaêl Grenouillet, Kevin S. Mccann, Bailey C. Mcmeans, Evan Fraser, Nam So, Zeb S. Hogan, Sovan Lek, Peng Bun Ngor

► To cite this version:

Gaêl Grenouillet, Kevin S. Mccann, Bailey C. Mcmeans, Evan Fraser, Nam So, et al. 'Flooding is a key driver of the Tonle Sap dai fishery in Cambodia'. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11 (1), pp.3815. 10.1038/s41598-021-81437-8. hal-04717366

HAL Id: hal-04717366

https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-04717366v1

Submitted on 2 Oct 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

OPEN

MATTERS ARISING

# Reply to: 'Flooding is a key driver of the Tonle Sap dai fishery in Cambodia'

Gaël Grenouillet<sup>1,2</sup>, Kevin S. McCann<sup>3</sup>, Bailey C. McMeans<sup>4</sup>, Evan Fraser<sup>3</sup>, Nam So<sup>5</sup>, Zeb S. Hogan<sup>6</sup>, Sovan Lek<sup>1</sup> & Peng Bun Ngor<sup>1,7&</sup>

REPLYING TO: A. S. Halls and K. G. Hortle; Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81248-x (2021).

We empirically analyzed<fnref n="1" /> an industrial-scale ‘Dai’ fishery (2000/2001–2014/2015) presenting the signatures of indiscriminate fishing effects on the Tonle Sap’s fish community. Halls and Hortle² suggest that apparent recent changes in Tonle Sap’s fish catch are more likely to reflect changing hydrological conditions than fishing-down effects, possibly caused by climate change and hydropower development. In addition, they question (1) the use of the *Dai* fishery data from 2000/01 onwards, as the fishery has been assessed since 1994³,⁴; (2) the *Dai* data being generated from a ‘standardized biological catch assessment’; (3) the explanation of compensatory response from small-bodied species in stabilizing the *Dai* seasonal catches; and (4) the mean fish weight used in<fnref n="1" /> being subject to ‘sampling related bias’. Finally, they claim that fishing effort from Tonle Sap may have declined as a result of fishing lot removal since 2012, and conclude that our findings may distract attention from irreversible and growing threats to fisheries caused by ongoing hydropower dam developments. We appreciate Halls and Hortle’s contributions and the opportunity to discuss these issues.

To begin with, we re-analyzed our data and quantified temporal trends in species' catch while accounting for both Flood Index (FI) suggested by Halls and Hortle and water temperature effects. To do this, we computed FI using mean daily water level data from Kampong Loung (Tonle Sap Lake) following⁴ and mean annual water temperature at Prek Kdam in Tonle Sap River where the *Dai* fishery operates. We then computed for each species a linear model expressing species abundance as a function of the two drivers, and assessed temporal trends in the residuals of these models (i.e. the part of variation not explained by FI and water temperature). The results indicated that 50% of species still showed a declining trend in residuals, with declines significantly more pronounced for large-bodied species (p-value = 0.016, Fig. 1). Here, we reiterate that our results support the findings of others, stressing the increasing contribution of catches of small-bodied species and the decline in the average fish size of the lower Mekong fisheries, both signs of overfishing⁵⁻⁷ and indiscriminate fishing effects⁸,⁹.

We analyzed the *Dai* data using 14 rows (*Dai* row 2–15) from 2000/01 onwards because of changes in sampling schemes and sampling intensity applied to assess the fishery. From 2000/01 onwards, *Dai* row 1 was discontinued, and it was only from that time that sampling intensity was relatively stable (see Halls et al. 2013, Table 11⁴) with *Dai* rows and their location unchanged. Although variation in the use of net types and mesh sizes may happen, the *Dai* gear is long-lasting of about 7 years on average¹⁰ and those gears are used seasonally to exploit fish systematically. This makes it seasonally comparable, particularly when the catch is assessed for the entire fishery.

By re-analysing the trends of seasonal catch of the three most prolific small species of the genus *Henichorynchus*, Halls and Hortle showed no compelling evidence of a compensatory response by small species, but did not consider the increasing trends of other small-bodied species (e.g. *Labiobarbus lineatus*) that were reported in the *Dai* catch (see Ngor et al.’s Supplementary Information Table S6¹). Moreover, Halls and Hortle claim that fishing effort has declined, referring to the fisheries reform in 2012¹<fnref n="1" />. This reform has led to the establishment of 516 community fisheries (CFi) countrywide. While such policy changes open larger space for local community participation, Cambodia is suffering from governance challenges to successfully implement this policy. The challenges include unclear roles and responsibilities of stakeholders, poor coordination among resource management agencies, limited decentralization of roles and responsibilities to the CFis, weak capacity of the CFi to manage their local resources, insufficient funding to implement the policy and strong livelihoods dependency of the local

<footnote n="1">¹CNRS, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, IRD, UMR5174 EDB (Laboratoire Évolution and Diversité Biologique), 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France. ²Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France. ³University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. ⁴University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada. ⁵Mekong River Commission Secretariat, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic. ⁶Global Water Center & Department of Biology, University of Nevada, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, USA. ⁷Wonders of the Mekong Project & Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Fisheries Administration, No. 186, Preah Norodom Blvd., Khan Chamcar Morn, P.O. Box 582, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. email: pengbun.ngor@gmail.com</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Temporal trend in residuals from the linear models relating species' catch to Flood Index and water temperature against (a) log-transformed fish species' maximum total length and (b) trophic level. The results indicated that 50% of species showed a declining trend in residuals, and this decline was significantly stronger for large-bodied fish species (p-value = 0.016).</figcaption></figure>

communities on fisheries, finally resulting in intensification of fishing effort and conflicts over access rights to fisheries resources<sup>12–17</sup>. Fishers indeed borrow money to buy fishing gears, and felt compelled to catch as many fish as possible to repay their loans and meet the household needs<sup>15</sup>. There is no data on changes in fishing effort, so the claims made by Halls and Hortle on its decrease since 2012 cannot be empirically confirmed or denied. Our reading of the situation is that the fisheries remain under intense pressure despite attempts to implement improved fisheries governance.

Finally, while Tonle Sap remains one of the world's largest inland fisheries, the system is facing many challenges, including intensive fishing pressure, with most large-sized Mekong fishes listed as threatened by IUCN and unsustainable fishing identified as a primary threat<sup>18</sup>. Our results do not imply that other impacts are unimportant, but rather that multiple (and potentially synergistic) stressors likely deteriorate the current status of the Tonle Sap fisheries<sup>19,20</sup> and need to be further assessed and considered in the decision-making process.

Received: 10 February 2020; Accepted: 5 January 2021

Published online: 15 February 2021

## References

1. Ngor, P. B. et al. Evidence of indiscriminate fishing effects in one of the world's largest inland fisheries. *Sci. Rep.* **8**, 8947. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27340-1 (2018).

2. Halls, A. S. & Hortle, K. G. Flooding is a key driver of the Tonle Sap dai fishery in Cambodia. *Sci. Rep.* https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81248-x (2021).

3. Lieng, S., Yim, C. & van Zalinge, N. Freshwater fisheries of Cambodia, I: The bagnet (Dai) fishery in the Tonle Sap River. *Asian Fish. Sci.* **8**, 255–262 (1995).

4. Halls, A. S. et al. *The Stationary Trawl (Dai) Fishery of the Tonle Sap-Great Lake System, Cambodia*. (Mekong River Commission, 2013).

5. Hortle, K. G., Lieng, S. & Valbo-Jorgensen, J. *An introduction to Cambodia's inland fisheries*. Mekong Development Series No. 4 (Mekong River Commission, 2004).

6. MRC. *State of the Basin Report 2010*. (Mekong River Commission, 2010).

7. Allan, J. D. et al. Overfishing of Inland Waters. *Bioscience* **55**, 1041–1051 (2005).

8. McCann, K. S. et al. Food webs and the sustainability of indiscriminate fisheries. *Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.* **73**, 1–10 (2016).

9. KC, K. B. et al. Exploring tropical fisheries through fishers' perceptions: Fishing down the food web in the Tonlé Sap, Cambodia. *Fish. Manag. Ecol.* **24**, 452–459 (2017).

10. Hap, N. & Ngor, P. B. An economic analysis of fish production in the Dai Fisheries in Phnom Penh/Kandal Province, Cambodia. in *Cambodia fisheries technical paper series, Volume III* (eds. Zalinge, N. van, Nuov, S., Ounsted, R. & Lieng, S.) (The Management of the Freshwater Capture Fisheries of Cambodia Component of the Mekong River Commission's Program for Fisheries Management and Development and the Department of Fisheries, 2001).

11. Cooperman, M. S. et al. A watershed moment for the Mekong: newly announced community use and conservation areas for the Tonle Sap Lake may boost sustainability of the world's largest inland fishery. *Cambodian J. Nat. History* **2012**, 101–106 (2012).

12. Thol, D. & Sato, J. The cost of privatizing the commons: Overlapping property systems in Tonle Sap, Cambodia. *Int. J. Commons* **9**, 261–280 (2015).

13. Thol, D. & Sato, J. Is greater fishery access better for the poor? Explaining de-territorialisation of the Tonle Sap, Cambodia. *J. Dev. Stud.* **50**, 962–976 (2014).
14. Ratner, B. D. Policy review community management by decree? Lessons from Cambodia's fisheries reform. *Soc. Nat. Resour.* **19**, 79–86 (2006).

15. Ratner, B. D., So, S., Mam, K., Oeur, I. & Kim, S. Conflict and collective action in Tonle Sap fisheries: Adapting governance to support community livelihoods. *Nat. Resour. Forum* **41**, 71–82 (2017).

16. Chap, S., Touch, P. & Diepart, J.-C. Fisheries reforms and right-based fisheries: Insights from community fisheries across Cambodia. (2016).

17. Chan, B., Ngor, P. B., Hogan, Z. S., So, N. & Brosse, S. Temporal dynamics of fish assemblages as a reflection of policy shift from fishing concession to co-management in one of the world's largest tropical flood pulse fisheries. *Water* **12**, 1–18 (2020).

18. Campbell, T., Pin, K., Ngor, P. B. & Hogan, Z. Conserving Mekong Megafishes: Current status and critical threats in Cambodia. *Water* **12**, 1820 (2020).

19. Ngor, P. B., Lek, S., McCann, K. S. & Hogan, Z. S. Dams threaten world's largest inland fishery. *Nature* **563**, (2018).

20. Arias, M., Holtgrieve, G., Ngor, P. B., Dang, T. D. & Piman, T. Maintaining perspective of ongoing environmental change in the Mekong floodplains. *Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.* **37**, 1–7 (2019).

## Acknowledgements

Our study is supported by the USAID-supported project: Wonders of the Mekong. All authors thank the Mekong River Commission and the Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute (IFReDI) of Cambodia for access to data. The Evolution et Diversité Biologique laboratory was supported by ‘Investissement d’Avenir’ Grants (CEBA, ref. ANR-10-LABX-0025; TULIP, ref. ANR-10-LABX-41).

## Author contributions

G.G., P.B.N and S.L. performed analysis. P.B.N. wrote the draft response. G.G., P.B.N., Z.S.H, S.L., K.M., B.M., E.F. and N.S. commented, edited and revised the draft response.

## Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Additional information

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to P.B.N.

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.

**Publisher's note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

© The Author(s) 2021