# Invasion of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) into central Africa: what consequences for emerging diseases?

Carine Ngoagouni, Basile Kamgang, Emmanuel Nakouné, Christophe Paupy, Mirdad Kazanji

► To cite this version:

Carine Ngoagouni, Basile Kamgang, Emmanuel Nakouné, Christophe Paupy, Mirdad Kazanji. Invasion of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) into central Africa: what consequences for emerging diseases?. Parasites & Vectors, 2015, 8 (1), pp.191. 10.1186/s13071-015-0808-3. hal-03002414

HAL Id: hal-03002414

https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-03002414

Submitted on 12 Jan 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Invasion of *Aedes albopictus* (Diptera: Culicidae) into central Africa: what consequences for emerging diseases?

Carine Ngoagouni<fnref n="1" />, Basile Kamgang<fnref n="1" />, Emmanuel Nakouné<fnref n="1" />, Chistophe Paupy²,³ and Mirdad Kazanji<fnref n="1" />*

**Abstract**

*Aedes albopictus*, a mosquito native to Asia, has invaded all five continents during the past three decades. It was reported in central Africa in the 2000s, first in Cameroon, and, since then, has colonised almost all countries of the region. The species, originally considered a secondary vector of dengue viruses, has been showed to play a major role in transmission of chikungunya virus in numerous countries, including in the central African region. We review the current spread of *Ae. albopictus* in central Africa, its larval ecology and its impact on indigenous species such as *Ae. aegypti*. We explore the potential of *Ae. albopictus* to affect the epidemiology of emerging or re-emerging arboviruses and discuss the conventional means for its control, while emphasizing the importance of data on its susceptibility to insecticides to cope with potential outbreaks.

**Keywords:** *Aedes albopictus*, *Aedes aegypti*, Invasive species, Arboviruses, Public health, Central Africa

**Introduction**

During the past three decades, *Aedes albopictus* (Skuse, 1894), an invasive species originating in Asia, has invaded the Americas, Europe and Africa [1,2]. This rapid global spread was favoured by international trade, especially of used tyres [3], and by its physio-local and ecological plasticity, which allow the species to thrive in a wide range of climates and habitats [4]. *Ae. albopictus* is considered to be a vector or potential vector of several pathogens of human and veterinary importance. Viral isolation and vector competence studies have shown that this mosquito is an efficient vector of more than 20 arboviruses [2,5].

In continental Africa, *Ae. albopictus* was first identified in South Africa in 1989, probably due to trade in used tyres from Japan, and it was promptly controlled [6]. It was identified in Nigeria 2 years later as an invasive species [7]. In central Africa, it was first reported in 2000 in Cameroon [8] and has since been found in almost all countries of the region. *Ae. albopictus* is often found with resident species in the same city and larval breeding sites, particularly with *Ae. aegypti* [4,9,10].

Several arboviruses have been isolated from mosquitoes and human samples in central Africa [11-14], but no massive outbreak has been reported before introduction of the new competent vector *Ae. albopictus*. In this paper, we report the current understanding of the biology, behaviour and vector status of this species and discuss the possible role for emerging new arboviruses in central Africa.

**Review**

**Current distribution of *Ae. albopictus***

The global spread of *Ae. albopictus* is due mainly to human activities, such as increase in intercontinental trade, especially in the past three decades [5]. In central Africa, *Ae. albopictus* was first described in 2000 in Cameroon [8], then in 2003 in Equatorial Guinea [15], in 2007 in Gabon [16], in 2009 in the Central African Republic (CAR) [17] and in 2011 in Republic of Congo [18] (Figure 1). In Cameroon, entomological investigation on a macrogeographical scale revealed that *Ae. albopictus* is present only in the southern part of the country, which is characterized by an equatorial climate, whereas the native species *Ae. aegypti* is present throughout the country [9,10]. A study in CAR showed that *Ae. albopictus* predominated over *Ae. aegypti* at all sites where both species were

<footnote>* Correspondence: mirdad.kazanji@pasteur.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Institut Pasteur de Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic</footnote>

<footnote>Full list of author information is available at the end of the article</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1** Chronology of invasion by *Ae. albopictus* in central Africa. The black circle represent the continental African countries infested by *Ae. albopictus*. 1st: Cameroon in 2000; 2nd: Equatorial Guinea in 2003; 3rd: Gabon in 2007; 4th: Central African Republic in 2010; 5th: Republic of Congo in 2011.</figcaption></figure>

sympatric [4], and data on the spatial distribution of *Ae. albopictus* showed that this invasive species is widespread in southern sites, such as Mbaïki, Batalimo, Mongoumba, Boda and Berberati, except in Bouar (located near Cameroon at 6°N latitude), where *Ae. aegypti* is found alone. High densities of *Ae. albopictus* were also reported in several cities in Gabon (Libreville, Lastouville in the south-east, Franceville, Oyem and Cocobeach in the north-west) [19-21]. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that invasive species are more likely to establish themselves in environments that are similar to their native environment but can also evolve to adapt better to their new environment [22]. The absence of *Ae. albopictus* above 6°N in Africa suggests a climatic limitation for invasion of the species [9,10].

## Biology

### i.) Breeding sites of *Ae. albopictus*

*Aedes albopictus* has strong ecological plasticity, which allows its rapid adaptation to a wide range of habitats. Studies in central Africa show that its larval

breeding sites are diverse, ranging from natural sites (e.g. tree holes, snail shells, rock holes, cacao shells, coconut shells and leaf axils) to artificial containers (e.g. water storage containers, used tyres, tin cans, car wrecks, flower-pots) [4,8-10] (Figure 2). Detailed characterisation of larval ecology in Cameroon and CAR showed that *Ae. albopictus* breeds mainly in used tyres, discarded tanks and flower-pots and prefers containers with plant debris and/or surrounded by vegetation. The most productive containers were used tyres, follow by discarded tanks [4,10].

### ii.) Feeding hosts and daily dynamics of host-seeking activity

*Aedes albopictus* has long been considered mainly zoophilic and able to feed on most groups of cold- and warm-blooded vertebrates, including reptiles, birds and amphibians [2,23,24]. Analysis of ingested blood in outdoor-resting females in Cameroon showed that *Ae. albopictus* preferentially fed on humans rather than on domestic animals (95% of blood meals contained human blood) [25]. These results conflict with the assumption that *Ae. albopictus* is mainly zoophilic [2,23,26] and are
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2** Examples of larval breeding sites of *Ae. albopictus*. A. tree holes; B. leaf axil; C. used tyres; D. flower-pot saucer.</figcaption></figure>

consistent with observations made in regions outside Africa, such as Thailand [27], the USA [28], Italy [29] and La Réunion [30]. These results indicate that the authors chose sites where animals were available, while *Ae. albopictus* prefers to feed on humans. The propensity of *Ae. albopictus* females to feed on humans in urban areas in Cameroon is a concern, as it suggests a risk for human-human pathogen transmission. Moreover, observation of a few blood meals in pigs and reptiles, and especially mixed animal-human meals, confirms that this species could act as a bridge vector for zoonotic pathogens [25]. Mosquito collection with a double-net device in Cameroon demonstrated that *Ae. albopictus* females feed during daytime, from 05:00 to 19:00, with a peak from 15:00-19:00 [25]. Although *Ae. albopictus* is sometimes observed indoors, it is generally considered exophilic and exophagic in Africa and elsewhere [5,23,30].

## Interaction with indigenous species *Ae. aegypti*

Numerous studies on the spatial coexistence of *Ae. aegypti* and *Ae. albopictus* have been conducted outside Africa, where the two species are sympatric [31,32]. In North America [33] and Brazil [31], the two species have similar larval ecological niches and often share the same

larval habitat. Likewise, in Mayotte, *Ae. albopictus* co-exists with *Ae. aegypti* in 40% of larval habitats [34]. As suggested by Paupy et al. [5], however, the apparent coexistence of the two species could be a transient situation, followed by a reduction [35-37] or displacement [38,39] of the resident species; interspecific larval competition for resources is the most likely reason for this process.

In central Africa, when *Ae. albopictus* was widespread, it was suspected to have played a major role in transmission of the viruses of dengue and chikungunya. Most of the studies therefore focused on viral detection or isolation, and few studies have been conducted on its interactions with the resident species *Ae. aegypti*. Nevertheless, two studies conducted in Cameroon [10] and CAR [4] provide more detail (such as building density, type of container, vegetation around the container and plant debris inside the container) on the spatial distribution and interactions between the invasive species *Ae. albopictus* and the resident species *Ae. aegypti*. Data obtained showed that immature stages of both species colonized a variety of artificial natural breeding sites and were often found together at the same larval development sites. *Ae. albopictus*, however, colonizes preferentially containers containing plant debris or surrounded by vegetation. Thus, although the two vectors are sympatric, significant differences in
their relative proportions and their spatial distribution are likely, due to environmental factors (e.g. climate, vegetation and building density). In the detailed study in Bangui (CAR), *Ae. aegypti* species represented the majority in the early rainy season, whereas *Ae. albopictus* was most abundant in the late rainy season. This is probably due to the better tolerance of *Ae. aegypti* eggs to desiccation than those of *Ae. albopictus*, as suggested by Juliano et al. [40]. All the studies undertaken in the sympatric area in central Africa suggest that *Ae. albopictus* tends to supplant the resident species *Ae. aegypti* [4,10,20,41].

## Population genetics and phylogeography

Since introduction of *Ae. albopictus* into central Africa, genetic studies have been conducted only in Cameroon [42,43] and CAR [4]. Analyses of Cameroonian samples with microsatellite markers showed moderate, statistically significant overall genetic differentiation between samples. No obvious relation between genetic and geographical distances was found, suggesting that the genetic structure has been shaped by additional biotic or abiotic factors. Analysis of mtDNA sequences revealed four haplotypes each for the *COI* and *ND5* genes, with a dominant haplotype shared by all Cameroonian samples [42]. Phylogeographical analysis based on *COI* polymorphism indicated that *Ae. albopictus* populations in Cameroon are related to tropical rather than temperate or subtropical outgroups [42]. Similar analysis of the CAR samples also showed little overall mtDNA diversity [4], which is consistent with the recent introduction of a few founder females or may be related to ubiquitous *Wolbachia* infection in populations of this species, as suggested by Armbruster et al. [44]. Phylogeographical analysis based on *COI* polymorphism indicated that the *Ae. albopictus* haplotype in the CAR population segregated into two lineages (Figure 3), suggesting multiple sources [4]. The moderate genetic diversity observed among Cameroonian and CAR *Ae. albopictus* isolates is in keeping with recent introduction and spread in these countries.

## Impact on health

Invasive mosquito species are defined by their ability to colonize new territories and can affect human health by concurrently harbouring novel pathogens, transmitting native pathogens or transmitting novel pathogens introduced independently [39]. Changes in the epidemiology of arboviruses after the introduction of invasive species have been seen throughout the world, including simultaneous introduction of *Ae. aegypti* and yellow fever virus in the Americas between the 16th and 17th centuries [38], the re-emergence of dengue in Asia after introduction of *Ae. aegypti* [45] and the emergence of dengue in Hawaii after *Ae. albopictus* was established in 2001 [46].

The introduction of *Ae. albopictus* and its subsequent rapid spread in numerous countries of central Africa is

particularly disturbing, as it is suspected to have played a major role in the transmission of Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) in Cameroon in 2006 [47] and was the main vector of CHIKV and dengue virus (DENV) in Gabon in 2007 [20,21,41,48]. In Cameroon, additional *Ae. albopictus* populations were shown to be orally susceptible to DENV-2 and highly competent for CHIKV [41]. In Republic of Congo more recently, Mombouli et al. [49] confirmed that *Ae. albopictus* together with the native species *Ae. aegypti* played a role in the dissemination and spread of CHIKV during the 2011 outbreak, after 39 years of absence. The role of *Ae. albopictus* in the transmission of DENV and CHIKV has been recognized since 2009 [5], and, in 2013, Grard et al. [50] provided the first direct evidence of human Zika virus (ZIKV) infection in the Asian tiger mosquito, *Ae. albopictus*, in Gabon. Phylogenetic analysis placed the Gabonese ZIKV at a basic position in the African lineage, in agreement with previously obtained complete sequences of ZIKV strains, indicating an African lineage and an Asian lineage [51]. Therefore, the emergence of ZIKV in Gabon was not due to an imported strain but rather to the diversification and spread of an ancestral strain belonging to the African lineage. These data from Libreville in 2007 are the first proof of human ZIKV infection in an urban environment during concurrent CHIKV and DENV outbreaks and its first occurrence in the invasive mosquito *Ae. albopictus*.

The introduction in central Africa of a new vector that is now known to be competent for more than 20 arboviruses is a public health problem, because three arboviruses (CHIKV, DENV and ZIKV) that are endemic in the region have re-emerged. *Ae. albopictus* can also transmit filarial nematodes, which are primarily parasites of dogs but can also affect humans. Evidence of its transmission by Italian *Ae. albopictus* populations [52,53] has been linked to an increased prevalence of human dirofilariosis [54]. The emergence of a new strain of CHIKV in Gabon shows that *Ae. albopictus* can interfere with the indigenous virus-vector system and augment viral emergence. This is a particular problem in areas such as central Africa where malaria is still a public health problem because of the diversity of pathogens transmitted by mosquitoes. In CAR, where a high infestation index of *Ae. albopictus* has been reported, there is thus an imminent risk for large outbreaks of arboviral infections, such as dengue, chikungunya and zika, as observed elsewhere in the region. It would be interesting to evaluate the vector competence of numerous arbovirus for *Ae. albopictus* populations and *Ae. aegypti* in central Africa to assess the risk for emergence or re-emergence in the region.

## Control of *Ae. albopictus*

In view of the occurrence in central Africa of large outbreaks of dengue and chikungunya, the main diseases
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3** Phylogeographical tree of *Ae. albopictus* from CAR and Cameroon based on COI. **A.** Subtropical or temperate region: GREE, Greece; REU, Reunion; HAWAI, Hawaii; FRAN, France; MADA, Madagascar; USA, United State of the America. **B.** Tropical region: CAR, Central African Republic; CAM, Cameroon; BRAZ, Brazil; VIET, Vietnam; THAI, Thailande; INDIA, India; CAMB, Cambodge.</figcaption></figure>

transmitted by *Ae. albopictus*, preventive measures are required in all countries of the region, because there is no vaccine or specific treatment against these diseases. Surveillance of invasive species is therefore essential to assess the risks for mosquito-borne diseases and to prepare for a disease outbreak. The conventional strategies for controlling *Ae. albopictus* are based on reduction of breeding sites and using larvicides such as temephos and *Bti* in natural and/or peridomestic breeding sites [55]. If treatment with larvicides fails and in emergency situations, space spraying with pyrethroids or organophosphates can reduce the density of adult mosquitoes [55]. Alternative strategies consist of biological control (e.g., the use of larvivorous organisms or bioinsecticides), reduction of human-to-vector contact with insect repellents and insecticide-treated materials and genetic control (e.g., releasing factory-produced sterile insects or genetically modified mosquitoes that are unable to transmit diseases to humans). Unfortunately, few studies have shown effective, sustainable control of the *Aedes* mosquitoes with these methods [5]. Meanwhile, biological control, using copepod in genus *Mesocyclops* has allowed eliminating immature stage of *Ae. aegypti* in water storage containers in Vietnam [56]. Recent data showed that all *Ae. aegypti* and *Ae. albopictus* samples collected in Cameroon and Libreville (Gabon) were susceptible to *Bti* and temephos, and both species were fully susceptible to deltamethrin, except in Yaoundé, where the *Ae. albopictus* population had a mortality rate of about 80%, strongly suggesting resistance. WHO bioassays on adult mosquitoes showed resistance to

dichloro-diphenyl trichlorethane (DDT) in one *Ae. aegypti* population in Gabon and two *Ae. albopictus* populations in Cameroon and suspected resistance to DDT in an *Ae. albopictus* sample from another site in Cameroon [57]. Vector surveillance and enhanced disease surveillance will enable early detection of cases and prompt implementation of control measures.

## Review conclusion

We have reviewed the current spread of the invasive species *Ae. albopictus* in central Africa, its larval ecology and its impact on the resident species, *Ae. aegypti*, and have explored the possible implication of *Ae. albopictus* in emerging or re-emerging arbovirus diseases. Various studies conducted in the region indicate that establishment and expansion of *Ae. albopictus* populations were facilitated by its ecological plasticity and by its ability to outcompete the indigenous species *Ae. aegypti*. *Ae. albopictus* thus found an environment similar to its native one, suggesting competition between this and native species. This invasive species is an efficient epidemic viral vector rather than a simple pest. The fact that central Africa has many potentially suitable niches for *Ae. albopictus*, as described in this review, and the presence of several endemic arboviruses of medical and veterinary importance could increase the risk for transmission of arboviruses such as DENV, CHIKV and ZIKV in central Africa. We have therefore reported measures for assessing the risk for mosquito-borne diseases and for preparing to control disease outbreaks.
**Competing interests**

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

**Authors' contributions**

CN and BK designed the study and wrote the manuscript. EN, CP and MK revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

**Acknowledgements**

This review was supported by Institut Pasteur of Bangui and the International Network of Pasteur Institutes (Actions Concertées Inter-Pasteuriennes) ACIP n° A12-12.

**Author details**

¹Institut Pasteur de Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic. ²Centre International de Recherches Médicales de Franceville (CIRMF), BP 769 Franceville, Gabon. ³Laboratoire des Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs: Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle, UMR 224-5290, CNRS-IRD-UM1-UM2, IRD, Montpellier, France.

Received: 22 October 2014 Accepted: 16 March 2015

Published online: 31 March 2015

**References**

1. Enserink M. Entomology. A mosquito goes global. Science. 2008;320 (5878):864-6.

2. Gratz NG. Critical review of the vector status of Aedes albopictus. Med Vet Entomol. 2004;18(3):215-27.

3. Reiter P. Aedes albopictus and the world trade in used tires, 1988-1995: the shape of things to come? J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1998;14(1):83-94.

4. Kamgang B, Ngoagouni C, Manirakiza A, Nakoune E, Paupy C, Kazanji M. Temporal patterns of abundance of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) and mitochondrial DNA analysis of Ae. albopictus in the Central African Republic. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(12):e2590.

5. Paupy C, Delatte H, Bagny L, Corbel V, Fontenille D. Aedes albopictus, an arbovirus vector: from the darkness to the light. Microbes Infect. 2009;11(14-15):1177-85.

6. Cornel AJ, Hunt RH. Aedes albopictus in Africa? First records of live specimens in imported tires in Cape Town. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1991;7(1):107-8.

7. Savage HM, Ezike VI, Nwankwo AC, Spiegel R, Miller BR. First record of breeding populations of Aedes albopictus in continental Africa: implications for arboviral transmission. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1992;8(1):101-3.

8. Fontenille D, Toto JC. Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse), a potential new Dengue vector in southern Cameroon. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(6):1066-7.

9. Simard F, Nchoutpouen E, Toto JC, Fontenille D. Geographic distribution and breeding site preference of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: culicidae) in Cameroon, Central Africa. J Med Entomol. 2005;42(5):726-31.

10. Kamgang B, Happi JY, Boisier P, Njiokou F, Herve JP, Simard F, et al. Geographic and ecological distribution of the dengue and chikungunya virus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in three major Cameroonian towns. Med Vet Entomol. 2010;24(2):132-41.

11. Mathiot CC, Gonzalez P, Georges AJ. Problèmes actuels des arboviroses en Centrafrique. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1988;81:396-401.

12. Gonzalez JP, Josse R, Johnson ED, Merlin M, Georges AJ, et al. Antibody prevalence against haemorrhagic fever viruses in randomized representative Central African populations. Res Virol. 1989;140:319-31.

13. Saluzzo JF, Gonzalez JP, Herve JP, Georges AJ. Epidemiological study of arboviruses in the Central African Republic: demonstration of Chikungunya virus during 1978 and 1979. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1980;73:390-9.

14. Meunier DM, Johnson ED, Gonzalez JP, Georges-Courbot MC, Madelon MC, et al. Current serologic data on viral hemorrhagic fevers in the Central African Republic. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1987;80:51-61.

15. Toto JC, Abaga S, Carnevale P, Simard F. First report of the oriental mosquito Aedes albopictus on the West African island of Bioko, Equatorial Guinea. Med Vet Entomol. 2003;17(3):343-6.

16. Coffinet T, Mourou JR, Pradines B, Toto JC, Jarjaval F, Arnalvict R, et al. First record of Aedes albopictus in Gabon. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007;23(4):471-2.

17. Diallo M, Laganier R, Nangouma A. First record of Ae. albopictus (Skuse 1894), in Central African Republic. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15(10):1185-9.

18. Kelvin AA. Outbreak of Chikungunya in the Republic of Congo and the global picture. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011;5(6):441-4.

19. Paupy C, Brengues C, Ndiath O, Toty C, Herve JP, Simard F. Morphological and genetic variability within Aedes aegypti in Niakhar, Senegal. Infect Genet Evol. 2010;10(4):473-80.

20. Pages F, Peyrefitte CN, Mve MT, Jarjaval F, Brisse S, Iteman I, et al. Aedes albopictus mosquito: the main vector of the 2007 Chikungunya outbreak in Gabon. PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4691.

21. Paupy C, Kassa Kassa F, Caron M, Nkoghe D, Leroy EM. A chikungunya outbreak associated with the vector Aedes albopictus in remote villages of Gabon. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12(2):167-9.

22. Lockwood JL, Hoopes M, Marchetti M. Invasion ecology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.

23. Hawley WA. The biology of Aedes albopictus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc Suppl. 1988;1:1-39.

24. Scholte EJ, Takken W, Knols BG. Infection of adult Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquitoes with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. Acta Trop. 2007;102(3):151-8.

25. Kamgang B, Nchoutpouen E, Simard F, Paupy C. Notes on the blood-feeding behavior of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Cameroon. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:57.

26. Scholte EJ, Schaffner F. Waiting the tiger: establishment and spread of the Aedes albopictus mosquito in Europe. In: Takken W, Knols BGJ, editors. Emerging Pest and Vecto-Borne Diseases in Europe. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2007. p. 241-60.

27. Ponlawat A, Harrington LC. Blood feeding patterns of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Thailand. J Med Entomol. 2005;42(5):844-9.

28. Richards SL, Ponnusamy L, Unnasch TR, Hassan HK, Apperson CS. Host-feeding patterns of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in relation to availability of human and domestic animals in suburban landscapes of central North Carolina. J Med Entomol. 2006;43(3):543-51.

29. Valerio L, Marini F, Bongiorno G, Facchinelli L, Pombi M, Caputo B, et al. Host-feeding patterns of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in urban and rural contexts within Rome province, Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10(3):291-4.

30. Delatte H, Desvars A, Bouetard A, Bord S, Gimonneau G, Vourc'h G, et al. Blood-feeding behavior of Aedes albopictus, a vector of Chikungunya on La Reunion. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10(3):249-58.

31. Braks MA, Honorio NA, Lourencqo-De-Oliveira R, Juliano SA, Lounibos LP. Convergent habitat segregation of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in southeastern Brazil and Florida. J Med Entomol. 2003;40(6):785-94.

32. Chen CD, Nazni WA, Lee HL, Seleena B, Mohd Masri S, Chiang YF, et al. Mixed breeding of Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes albopictus Skuse in four dengue endemic areas in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor, Malaysia. Trop Biomed. 2006;23(2):224-7.

33. Juliano SA, Lounibos LP, O'Meara GF. A field test for competitive effects of Aedes albopictus on A. aegypti in South Florida: differences between sites of coexistence and exclusion? Oecologia. 2004;139(4):583-93.

34. Bagny L, Freulon M, Delatte H. [First record of Aedes albopictus, vector of arboviruses in the Eparse Islands of the Mozambique Channel and updating of the inventory of Culicidae]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2009;102(3):193-8.

35. Bagny L, Delatte H, Quilici S, Fontenille D. Progressive decrease in Aedes aegypti distribution in Reunion Island since the 1900s. J Med Entomol. 2009;46(6):1541-5.

36. Bagny L, Delatte H, Elissa N, Quilici S, Fontenille D. Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) vectors of arboviruses in Mayotte (Indian Ocean): distribution area and larval habitats. J Med Entomol. 2009;46(2):198-207.

37. Raharimalala FN, Ravaomanarivo LHO, Ravelonandro P, Rafaraso LS, Zouache K, Tran-Van V, et al. Biogeography of the two major arbovirus mosquito vectors, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera, Culicidae), in Madagascar. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:56.

38. Lounibos LP. Invasions by insect vectors of human disease. Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:233-66.

39. Juliano SA, Lounibos LP. Ecology of invasive mosquitoes: effects on resident species and on human health. Ecol Lett. 2005;8(5):558-74.

40. Juliano SA, O'Meara GF, Morrill JR, Cutwa MM. Desiccation and thermal tolerance of eggs and the coexistence of competing mosquitoes. Oecologia. 2002;130(3):458-69.

41. Paupy C, Ollomo B, Kamgang B, Moutailler S, Rousset D, Demanou M, et al. Comparative role of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti in the emergence
of Dengue and Chikungunya in central Africa. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10(3):259-66.

42. Kamgang B, Brengues C, Fontenille D, Njiokou F, Simard F, Paupy C. Genetic structure of the tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus, in Cameroon (Central Africa). PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20257.

43. Usmani-Brown S, Cohnstaedt L, Munstermann LE. Population Genetics of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) Invading Populations, Using Mitochondrial nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Dehydrogenase Subunit 5 Sequences. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2009;102(1):144-50.

44. Armbruster P, Damsky Jr WE, Giordano R, Birungi J, Munstermann LE, Conn JE. Infection of New- and Old-World Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) by the intracellular parasite Wolbachia: implications for host mitochondrial DNA evolution. J Med Entomol. 2003;40(3):356-60.

45. Weaver SC, Reisen WK. Present and future arboviral threats. Antiviral Res. 2010;85(2):328-45.

46. Effler PV, Pang L, Kitsutani P, Vorndam V, Nakata M, Ayers T, et al. Dengue fever, Hawaii, 2001-2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(5):742-9.

47. Peyrefitte CN, Rousset D, Pastorino BA, Pouillot R, Bessaud M, Tock F, et al. Chikungunya virus, Cameroon, 2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(5):768-71.

48. Caron M, Paupy C, Grard G, Becquart P, Mombo I, Nso BB, et al. Recent introduction and rapid dissemination of Chikungunya virus and Dengue virus serotype 2 associated with human and mosquito coinfections in Gabon, central Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(6):e45-53.

49. Mombouli JV, Bitsindou P, Elion DO, Grolla A, Feldmann H, Niama FR, et al. Chikungunya virus infection, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(9):1542-3.

50. Grard G, Caron M, Mombo JM, Nkoghe D, Mboui Ondo S, Jiolle D, et al. Zika virus in Gabon (Central Africa)-2007: a new threat from Aedes albopictus? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(2):e2681.

51. Haddow AD, Schuh AJ, Yasuda CY, Kasper MR, Heang V, Huy R, et al. Genetic characterization of Zika virus strains: geographic expansion of the Asian lineage. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(2):e1477.

52. Cancrini G, Frangipane di Regalbono A, Ricci I, Tessarin C, Gabrielli S, Pietrobelli M. Aedes albopictus is a natural vector of Dirofilaria immitis in Italy. Vet Parasitol. 2003;118(3-4):195-202.

53. Cancrini G, Romi R, Gabrielli S, Toma L, DIP M, Scaramozzino P. First finding of Dirofilaria repens in a natural population of Aedes albopictus. Med Vet Entomol. 2003;17(4):448-51.

54. Pampiglione S, Rivasi F, Angeli G, Boldorini R, Incensati RM, Pastormerlo M, et al. Dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria repens in Italy, an emergent zoonosis: report of 60 new cases. Histopathology. 2001;38(4):344-54.

55. WHO: Haemorrhagic Fever. Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control, second ed. WHO, Geneva, 1997, pp.1-84. Geneva: WHO; 1997. p. 1-84.

56. Vu SN, Nguyen TY, Tran VP, Truong UN, Le QM, Le VL, et al. Elimination of dengue by community programs using Mesocyclops(Copepoda) against Aedes aegypti in central Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;72(1):67-73.

57. Kamgang B, Marcombe S, Chandre F, Nchoutpouen E, Nwane P, Etang J, et al. Insecticide susceptibility of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Central Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:79.

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:

* Convenient online submission

* Thorough peer review

* No space constraints or color figure charges

* Immediate publication on acceptance

* Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

* Research which is freely available for redistribution

Submit your manuscript at
www.biomedcentral.com/submit

BioMed Central