49. Saini A. Superior: The Return of Race Science. HarperCollins UK; 2019.

50. Mekel-Bobrov N, Posthuma D, Gilbert SL, Lind P, Gosso MF, Luciano M, et al. The ongoing adaptive evolution of ASPM and Microcephalin is not explained by increased intelligence. Hum Mol Genet. 2007; 16(6):600–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddl487 PMID: 17220170

51. Rushton JP, Vernon PA, Bons TA. No evidence that polymorphisms of brain regulator genes Microcephalin and ASPM are associated with general mental ability, head circumference or altruism. Biol Lett. 2007; 3(2):157–160. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0586

52. Woodley MA, Rindermann H, Bell E, Stratford J, Piffer D. The relationship between Microcephalin, ASPM and intelligence: A reconsideration. Intelligence. 2014; 44:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.02.011

53. Frost P. The spread of alphabetical writing may have favored the latest variant of the ASPM gene. Med Hypotheses. 2008; 70(1):17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2007.04.039

54. Dediu D, Ladd DR. Genetic influences on tone? New experimental evidence and its consequences for linguistics. PsyArXiv; 2020. Available from: https://psyarxiv.com/vkb7w/.

55. Stromswold K. The Heritability of Language: A Review and Metaanalysis of Twin, Adoption, and Linkage Studies. Language. 2001; 77:647–723. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0247

56. Fisher SE. Tangled webs: tracing the connections between genes and cognition. Cognition. 2006; 101 (2):270–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.004

57. Lai CS, Fisher SE, Hurst JA, Vargha-Khadem F, Monaco AP. A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature. 2001; 413(6855):519–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/35097076

58. Dediu D. Non-spurious correlations between genetic and linguistic diversities in the context of human evolution [PhD Thesis]. University of Edinburgh, UK; 2007. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4252896.

59. Dediu D. Evolution of Syntax: Memes-Genes Coevolution in the Multiregional Context [MSc Thesis]. University of Bucharest, Romania; 2002.

60. Collins J. Real and spurious correlations involving tonal languages. In: Enfield N, editor. Dependencies in language: On the causal ontology of linguistics systems. No. 99 in Studies in Diversity Linguistics. Berlin: Language Science Press; 2016. p. 127–138.

61. Haspelmath M, Dryer MS, Gil D, Comrie B, editors. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press; 2005.

62. Cavalli-Sforza LL. The Human Genome Diversity Project: past, present and future. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2005; 6(4):333–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1596

63. Mace R, Pagel M. The comparative method in anthropology. Current Anthropology. 1994; 35:549–564. https://doi.org/10.1086/204317

64. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967; 27(2):209–20.

65. Nei M. Genetic Distance between Populations. The American Naturalist. 1972; 106:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1086/282771

66. Gordon RG, editor. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 15th ed. SIL International; 2005. Available from: http://www.ethnologue.com/.

67. Donohue M, Hetherington R, McElvenny J, Dawson V. World phonotactics database; 2013. Available from: http://phonotactics.anu.edu.au.

68. Hammarström H, Bank S, Forkel R, Haspelmath M. Glottolog 3.2. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History; 2018. Available from: http://glottolog.org.

69. Dryer MS. Large Linguistic Areas and Language Sampling. Studies in Language. 1989; 13:257–292. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.2.03dry

70. Nichols J. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. University of Chicago Press; 1999.

71. Hammarström H, Donohue M. Some Principles on the Use of Macro-Areas in Typological Comparison. Language Dynamics and Change. 2014; 4(1):167–187. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00401001

72. Reich D. Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the new science of the human past. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2018.

73. Josserand M, Allassonnière-Tang M, Pellegrino F, Dediu D. Interindividual variation refuses to go away: a Bayesian computer model of language change in communicative networks. Frontiers in Language Sciences. 2021;.

74. Pearl J. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press; 2000.
75. Pearl J, Mackenzie D. The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. Penguin UK; 2018.

76. Bürkner PC. brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software. 2017; 80(1):1–28.

77. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; 2020. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.

78. Stan Development Team. Stan Modeling Language Users Guide and Reference Manual; 2020. Available from: https://mc-stan.org.

79. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. 2015; 67(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

80. Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, et al. glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. The R Journal. 2017; 9(2):378–400. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-066

81. Kruschke JK, Liddell TM. The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2018; 25(1):178–206. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4

82. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press; 2006.

83. Bakker D. Language sampling. In: Song JJ, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.

84. Everett C, Blasi DE, Roberts SG. Climate, vocal folds, and tonal languages: Connecting the physiological and geographic dots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015; p. 201417413.

85. MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation Analysis. Annual review of psychology. 2007; 58:593. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542

86. Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, Imai K. mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. 2014; 59(5):1–38. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i05

87. Lüdecke D. sjstats: Statistical Functions for Regression Models (Version 0.18.0); 2020. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjstats.

88. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press; 2011.

89. Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012; 48(2):1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

90. Hothorn T, Zeileis A. partykit: A Modular Toolkit for Recursive Partytionsing in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2015; 16:3905–3909.

91. Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News. 2002; 2(3):18–22.

92. Revell LJ. phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2012; 3:217–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x

93. Höhna S, Landis MJ, Heath TA, Boussau B, Lartillot N, Moore BR, et al. RevBayes: Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference Using Graphical Models and an Interactive Model-Specification Language. Systematic Biology. 2016; 65(4):726–736. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw021 PMID: 27235697

94. Dediu D. Making Genealogical Language Classifications Available for Phylogenetic Analysis: Newick Trees, Unified Identifiers, and Branch Length. Language Dynamics and Change. 2018;(8):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00801001

95. Jäger G. Support for linguistic macrofamilies from weighted sequence alignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015; 112(41):12752–12757. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1500331112

96. Dediu D, Levinson SC. Abstract Profiles of Structural Stability Point to Universal Tendencies, Family-Specific Factors, and Ancient Connections between Languages. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(9):e45198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045198

97. Pagel M, Atkinson QD, Calude AS, Meade A. Ultraconserved words point to deep language ancestry across Eurasia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013; 110(21):8471–8476. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218726110

98. Green P, MacLeod CJ. simr: an R package for power analysis of generalised linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2016; 7(4):493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504

99. Piantadosi ST, Gibson E. Quantitative Standards for Absolute Linguistic Universals. Cognitive Science. 2014; 38(4):736–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12088

100. Bergström A. Genomic insights into the human population history of Australia and New Guinea [The sis]. University of Cambridge; 2018. Available from: https://www/repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/ 273775.
101. Butcher A. Australian aboriginal languages: Consonant-Salient Phonologies and the 'Place-of-Articulation Imperative'. In: Harrington J, Tabain M, editors. Speech Production: Models, Phonetic Processes, and Techniques. Macquarie Monographs in Cognitive Science. Psychology Press: NY; 2006. p. 187–210. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251509897_Australian_Aboriginal_languages_Consonant.salient.phonologies_and_the_%27place-of-articulation_imperative