# Antimicrobial Potential of Food Lactic Acid Bacteria: Bioactive Peptide Decrypting from Caseins and Bacteriocin Production

Stefano Nebbia, Cristina Lamberti, Giuliana Lo Bianco, Simona Cirrincione, Valerie Laroute, Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet, Laura Cavallarin, Maria Gabriella Giuffrida, Enrica Pessione

► To cite this version:

Stefano Nebbia, Cristina Lamberti, Giuliana Lo Bianco, Simona Cirrincione, Valerie Laroute, et al. "Antimicrobial Potential of Food Lactic Acid Bacteria: Bioactive Peptide Decrypting from Caseins and Bacteriocin Production." *Microorganisms*, 2021, 9 (1), 10.3390/microorganisms9010065. hal-03274558

HAL Id: hal-03274558

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03274558

Submitted on 30 Jun 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Article

# Antimicrobial Potential of Food Lactic Acid Bacteria: Bioactive Peptide Decrypting from Caseins and Bacteriocin Production

Stefano Nebbia<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />, Cristina Lamberti<fnref n="2" />, Giuliana Lo Bianco<fnref n="1" />, Simona Cirrincione<fnref n="2" />,*, Valerie Laroute<fnref n="3" />,†, Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet<fnref n="3" />, Laura Cavallarin<fnref n="2" />,†, Maria Gabriella Giuffrida<fnref n="2" />,† and Enrica Pessione<fnref n="1" />,†

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Nebbia, S.; Lamberti, C.; Lo Bianco, G.; Cirrincione, S.; Laroute, V.; Cocaign-Bousquet, M.; Cavallarin, L.; Giuffrida, M.G.; Pessione, E.
Antimicrobial Potential of Food Lactic Acid Bacteria: Bioactive Peptide Decrypting from Caseins and Bacteriocin Production.
*Microorganisms* **2021**, *9*, 65.
https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/microorganisms9010065

Received: 30 November 2020
Accepted: 24 December 2020
Published: 29 December 2020

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

**Abstract:** Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) potential in the food industry and in the biotechnological sector is a well-established interest. LAB potential in counteracting especially food-borne infections has received growing attention, but despite being a road full of promises is yet poorly explored. Furthermore, the ability of LAB to produce antimicrobial compounds, both by ribosomal synthesis and by decrypting them from proteins, is of high value when considering the growing impact of multidrug resistant strains. The antimicrobial potential of 14 food-derived lactic acid bacteria strains has been investigated in this study. Among them, four strains were able to counteract *Listeria monocytogenes* growth: *Lactococcus lactis* SN12 and *L. lactis* SN17 by high lactic acid production, whereas *L. lactis* 41FLL3 and *Lactobacillus sakei* I151 by Nisin Z and Sakacin P production, respectively. Strains *Lactococcus lactis* MG1363, *Lactobacillus rhamnosus* 17D10 and *Lactobacillus helveticus* 4D5 were tested and selected for their potential attitude to hydrolyze caseins. All the strains were able to release bioactive peptides with already known antimicrobial, antihypertensive and opioid activities. These features render these strains or their bioactive molecules suitable for use in food as biocontrol agents, or as nutraceutical supplements to treat mild disorders such as moderate hypertension and children insomnia. These results highlight once again that LAB potential in ensuring food safety, food nutraceutical value and ultimately in favoring human health is still underexplored and underexploited.

**Keywords:** antimicrobial peptides; casein; lactic acid; mass spectrometry; Sakacin; Nisin Z. *Lactobacillus sakei* I151; *Lactococcus lactis*; *Lactobacillus rhamnosus* 17D10; *Lactobacillus helveticus* 4D5

## 1. Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are GRAS (generally recognized as safe) organisms that have been employed as starters since the last century in different food sectors such as the dairy industry, breweries, wine-making and many others (fermented sausages and sauerkrauts production) [1]. Their probiotic role as health-promoting microorganisms, firstly perceived at the beginning of the 20th century by the Russian biologist Metchnikoff [2] has been extensively investigated in the last decades and a huge number of LAB species have been included in the probiotic list [3]. Probiotics can control almost all physiological functions of the host organism among which the most important are nutritional status [4], metabolism [5], immunity [6], mental health and mood [7]. More recently, LAB have found application also as cell factories for bioconversions. As an example, waste conversion into

<footnote n="1">¹ Laboratory of Microbial and Applied Biochemistry-Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Università di Torino, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123 Torino, Italy; stefano.nebbia@ispa.cnr.it (S.N.); giuliana.lobianco@gmail.com (G.L.B.); enrica.pessione@unito.it (E.P.)</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche-Istituto di Scienze delle Produzioni Alimentari, Largo Braccini, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy; cristina.lamberti@ispa.cnr.it (C.L.); laura.cavallarin@ispa.cnr.it (L.C.); gabriella.giuffrida@ispa.cnr.it (M.G.G.)</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Laboratoire d'ingénierie des systèmes biologiques et des procédés, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRA, INSA 135 Avenue de Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse, France; vlaroute@insa-toulouse.fr (V.L.); cocaign@insa-toulouse.fr (M.C.-B.)</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: simona.cirrincione@ispa.cnr.it; Tel.: +39-011-670-9231</footnote>

<footnote>† These authors contributed equally to this work.</footnote>
lactic acid has been used as the building block for polylactide biodegradable polymers (PLA) production [4].

However, a well-known but still underexploited role is their ability to control food spoilage and food-borne infections. Regarding spoilage, LAB have been employed to extend the shelf-life of food [8], when suitably tested to avoid reciprocal antagonistic action with starter strains when fermented food is concerned. Attempts were also made to counteract food-borne infections such as those caused by *Staphylococcus aureus* [9] and *Listeria monocytogenes* [10]. More recently, LAB have attracted researcher's attention as alternative treatment to antibiotic therapy [11]. Antibiotic resistance is considered a major threat to public health (World Health Organization 2014) since it is widespread in pathogenic, commensal and food bacteria. The growing impact of multidrug resistant (MDR) strains originating from selective pressure by unnecessary antibiotic abuse in the past 60 years, requires the urgent finding of new antimicrobial drugs [12]. The prolonged antibiotic treatments on farm animals is also responsible of antibiotic resistance among cheese starters or meat biocontrol strains [13]. Together with the emergence of severe food-borne infections such as those caused by *Listeria monocytogenes* and *Staphylococcus aureus* [14], this makes the food ecological niche an ideal habitat for horizontal gene transfer promoting acquisition of resistance genes by pathogens. Therefore, a solution should urgently be found to ensure food safety for the consumers [15].

Several strategies have been proposed in the past two decades to respond to the need of new antibacterial agents. From one side, a bacteriostatic and bactericidal effect can be obtained by the use of inorganic and organic compounds such as metals [16], surfactants [17] and plant essential oils [18], however these molecules are not always suitable for food use. From another side, the use of living organisms, although sometimes controversial, such as bacteriophages [19,20] and competing probiotic strains [21] has been suggested as well. In addition, quorum-quenchers have been proposed for fighting infections caused by both Gram negative [22] and Gram-positive [23] bacteria, since in some cases an alternative to killing bacteria is to prevent the production of toxins and other virulence factors that are synthesized under quorum sensing control.

However, a current winning strategy is the use of bacterial derived compounds such as metabolic end-products and bacteriocins [24]. The microbial world has a great potential in producing antibacterial compounds which differ deeply in their structure, including catabolic end-products such as solvents (acetone, butanol, and ethanol) and acids (lactic, acetic, formic, and butyric) but also peptides, proteins and enzymes [21]. Screening natural microbial strains to find the ones able to produce antimicrobial molecules is a promising strategy. In particular, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are good candidates for finding molecules preventing food-borne infections since they have a long evolutionary history in the food ecological niche in which fighting competitive species is pivotal for surviving. A huge number of either bacteriostatic or bactericidal compounds from LAB have been described [1]. An emblematic example is *Lactobacillus reuteri* that can synthesize at least three molecules interfering with bacterial growth: reuterin, reuterocyclin and reutericin. Reuterin has a molecular mass lower than 100 Da and exerts its antimicrobial activity thanks to the complex formed with gut amines [25]. Reuterocyclins are small hydrophobic compounds with a molecular mass of 349 Da that exhibits a broad inhibitory spectrum against *Bacillus subtilis*, *Bacillus cereus*, *Enterococcus faecalis*, *Listeria innocua*, and *Staphylococcus aureus*. On the latter microorganisms, a bactericidal mode of action triggering cell lysis has been demonstrated [26]. Reutericin 6 is a bacteriocin-like proteinaceous molecule with a molecular weight of 2.700 Da and its amino acid analysis reveals a composition characterized by 67% of hydrophobic and polar neutral amino acids [27].

Bacteriocins are small peptides or proteins, secreted or surface-bound, active at very low concentration (nanomolar). They are highly specific and generally can kill the target bacteria by acting at the cell surface (membrane or cell-wall) level [14]. Some bacteriocins are involved in the dissipation of the proton gradient across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane, other inhibit the biosynthesis of the cell wall or also create "pores" which cause
loss of metabolites [28,29]. In spite of the fact that some of them have been used for about 50 years as food additives (to prevent spoilage and food borne infections) only few cases of resistance against bacteriocins have been reported [30,31].

LAB are high performing producers of these molecules [11]: nisin A (the first patented bacteriocin) has been isolated in 1928 [32] and also pediocin, enterocin, sakacin, lactococcin, helveticin, reutericin, lactacine, salivaricine, mutacine, gassericine represent examples of LAB products [33]. The present limit of bacteriocin use in human infection control lies in the fact that most of these molecules are peptides, hence they can be hydrolyzed during the gastric transit by endogenous peptidases. Several attempts have been made to protect bacteriocins from degradation, and, among these, the resistance to proteases is one of the most promising [34]. However, these molecules can be purified and encapsulated to reach the lower gastrointestinal tract intact, where they can exert a beneficial activity both for controlling gut infections and being absorbed and having a systemic action.

In parallel to bacteriocins, other interesting antimicrobial molecules released by LAB are not of metabolic origin but rather the result of a proteolytic action on different proteins, generally present in food [35]. Casocidin (αs2-casein-derived peptide), isracidin, consisting of the first 23 amino acids of αs1-casein, and the k-casein-derived kappacin display antimicrobial action against S. aureus but also towards *Bacillus*, *L. monocytogenes*, *Escherichia coli*, *Klebsiella*, *Salmonella* and *Pseudomonas* [36,37]. LAB are equipped with a very efficient proteolytic system (which includes extracellular proteases, surface peptidases, transporters and intracellular oligopeptidases) and they can liberate encrypted antibacterial peptides from food proteins such as milk proteins (casein, alpha-lactalbumin, lactoferrin, lactadherine, lactoglobulines), gluten, soya and bovine hemoglobin [1]. The mode of action of these peptides is based upon a strongly positively charged domain that can interact with teichoic acids (in Gram-positive bacteria) or LPS (in Gram-negative bacteria) [38]. Later the hydrophobic moiety of the peptide can bind to bacterial membranes, dissipating the proton gradient and causing membrane depolarization (like the antibiotics polymixin B and colistin) and cell lysis, similarly to what happens with bacteriocins [39]. Other mechanisms, for instance a synergic action with host innate immunity and a metabolic perturbation, were also described [40]. The stability of these peptides in human blood render them promising anti-infection agents.

The aim of the present investigation was to test the antimicrobial potential of different food-isolated LAB by detecting antimicrobial activities against *L. monocytogenes*. In parallel, negative strains (not able to counteract Listeria growth) were tested for their capability to decrypt antibacterial peptides from alpha, beta and kappa casein. The experimental plan concerned: (i) the evaluation of lactate dehydrogenase activity, (ii) the characterization and purification of bacteriocins, (iii) the evaluation of bacterial ability to hydrolyze milk proteins and release antimicrobial peptides, characterized by mass spectrometry. The final objective is to have information on the potential antimicrobial and proteolytic attitude of different LAB strains in order to optimize methods to obtain molecules possibly useful in counteracting food-borne infections afigurend food spoilage.

## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. *Chemicals and Instruments*

All chemicals were from Merck KGaA (Saint Luis, MI, USA). VersaMax Microplate and SoftMax Pro were from Molecular Devices (San Jose, CA, USA). Bradford assay, Mini-PROTEAN Tetra Cell and Mini-Protean Tricine precast gels were from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). Plus DNA Ladder and PageRuler Low range unstained protein ladder were from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Stericup filters were from Milipore (Burlington, MA, USA). HiTrap SP FF cation exchange column and HiTrapOctyl FF hydrophobic interaction column were from GE Healthcare (Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). Vivacel 250 membrane filter were from Sartorius (Gottinga, Germany). Ultraflex III MALDI-TOF/TOF instrument and Flex Analysis software were from Bruker Daltonik GmbH (Bremen, Germany).
## 2.2. Isolation of LAB from Food Samples

Fourteen LAB, isolated from food samples, were grown on both MRS (allowing growth of lactobacilli) and M17 (allowing growth of lactococci) media, both at 30 °C and 37 °C and were identified by the Crystal ANR and GP (BBL) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) based on fluorogenic and chromogenic analysis of metabolic products. Twelve bacterial strains were isolated from cheese. They belonged to the following species: *Lactobacillus. acidophilus* (4 strains), *Lactobacillus. casei* (3 strains), *Lactobacillus hilgardii* (1 strain), *Lactobacillus helveticus* (1 strain 4D5), *Lactobacillus rhamnosus* (1 strain 17D10) and *Lactococcus lactis* (2 strains). Further two strains (*Lactobacillus.sakei* I151 and *Lactococcus lactis* 41FLL3) were isolated from fermented sausages. We also considered a reference strain (*L. lactis* MG1363) belonged to the culture collection of the Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Biologiques et des Procédés (LISBP), Toulouse. The strains were maintained in suitable culture medium at -20 °C in 0.5 mL aliquots with 0.5 mL of 40% (v/v) glycerol.

## 2.3. Selection of Strains Producing Antimicrobial Molecules

All isolated strains, potentially producing antimicrobial compounds, were tested against *L. monocytogenes* using in liquid assay. Aliquots (50 µL) of cell free supernatants obtained by centrifugation (4000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C) of LAB cultures grown for 18 h in closed 250 mL screw cap bottles in either MRS or M17 broth were added to 1 mL of a freshly inoculated *L. monocytogenes* culture and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated by observing the OD₆₀₀ decrease, using the OD₆₀₀ value of *L. monocytogenes* alone as reference. The inhibition percentage was calculated through the formula: 1- (OD₆₀₀ fraction / OD₆₀₀ * L. monocytogenes) × 100). In order to confirm the proteinaceous nature of the antimicrobial molecules, 20 µL of proteinase K (buffered aqueous glycerol solution ≥ 10 mg/mL) were incubated with 50 µL of supernatants for 1 h at 37 °C. Then, the samples were incubated for 10 min at 70 °C to inactivate the enzyme. The treated samples were processed as the other samples for antimicrobial activity.

## 2.4. Detection of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Activity

Ten mg of bacteria were collected by centrifugation (4000× g, 20 min, 4 °C), washed 3 times with 0.2% KCl, and mixed with 0.5 g of glass beads and 1 mL of extraction buffer (70% Tris/HCl 1 M pH 7.5, 23% glycerol, 7% MgCl₂ 50 mM and 170 µL DTT 300 mM). Bacterial lysis was performed by alternating six cycles of 30 s Vortex (6.5 rpm) with 1 min on ice. Bacterial lysate diluted in water (5 and 30 times, respectively for lactobacilli and lactococci) was used to evaluate the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity. Samples (80 µL) were mixed with 110 µL of enzymatic buffer (46% Tris/HCl 400 mM, 18% MgCl₂ 50 mM, 18% NADH 6 mM and 18% Fructose 1-6 bisphosphate 30 mM) and 10 µL of 400 mM pyruvate as substrate. LDH activity was measured as the decrease of NADH peak at 340 nm in 96 wells microtiter plates and SoftMax Pro was used for data processing. The activity was expressed as Units (U)/mL of cell lysate/g protein (1 U = 1 µmol of substrate hydrolyzed per minute). Total protein content from bacterial lysate were quantified by the Bradford assay [41], using BSA as the standard.

## 2.5. Identification of the *nisZ* Gene in *L. lactis* 41FLL3 by PCR

*L. lactis* 41FLL3 was grown in M17 medium and cells were collected at the log phase by centrifugation (4000× g, 20 min, 4 °C) and resuspended in water. Based on the work of Sunita et al. (2012) [42], specific primers (Forward: 5'-ATGAGTACAAAAGATTTTAA CTTGG-3' and Reverse: 5'-TTATTTGCTTACGTGAATACTACA-3') were used to amplify *nisZ* gene using a Bio-Rad thermal cycler. Thermocycling conditions were as follows: initial cell lysis for 16 min at 95 °C then 34 cycles of 15 sec at 95 °C, 15 sec at 55 °C and 30 sec at 72 °C. The final cycle was followed by 5 min of incubation at 72 °C. Ultrapure water was used as the negative control. After reaction, 6 µL of sample was loaded in 2.5% (w/v) agarose gel in TBE (Tris Borate, EDTA) and 1Kb Plus DNA Ladder was used as the marker.
## 2.6. Purification and Quantification of Nisin Z and Sakacin P

At the beginning of the stationary phase, 200 mL of supernatants from *L. sakei* I151 and *L. lactis* 41FLL3 culture was recovered. Bacteria were removed by centrifugation (4000× g, 20 min, 4 °C) followed by filtration in stericup 0.22 µm filters.

Nisin Z purification: Supernatants obtained from *L. lactis* 41FLL3 cultures were diluted with 400 mL of 50 mM lactic acid pH 3 and loaded on a 5 mL HiTrap SP FF cation exchange column using a flow rate of 4 mL/min. The column was washed with 50 mL lactic acid pH 3 to remove non-specific contaminants. The elution was performed with 50 mL lactic acid pH 3 added with a NaCl gradient increasing from 0.2 M to 1 M (10 mL for all the NaCl concentration; gradient step 0.2 M). Two mL fractions were collected and their Nisin Z content was evaluated by both OD₂₁₅ measurement and the previously described in-liquid assay using *L. monocytogenes* as indicator. *L. lactis* 41FLL3 was grown in M17 broth at 30 and 37 °C and in the same medium fortified with 2% (*w/v*) fructose and 2% (*w/v*) glucose in order to improve Nisin Z production.

Sakacin P purification: The solution obtained from *L. sakei* I151 was loaded on a 5 mL HiTrap SP FF cation exchange column, previously equilibrated with 20 mM sodium acetate pH 4.2 (start buffer), using a flow rate of 5 mL/min. After sample loading, the column was washed with 25 mL of start buffer and the bacteriocin was eluted with 25 mL of elution buffer (start buffer fortified with NaCl 1M). Two mL fractions were collected and their antimicrobial activity was measured by the previously described in-liquid assay using *L. monocytogenes* as indicator. The fractions displaying antimicrobial activity were pooled and supplemented with 10% (*w/v*) ammonium sulphate as anti-chaotropic salt and immediately filtered to remove turbidity (0.45 µm filter). The obtained solution was applied to a 1 mL HiTrapOctyl FF hydrophobic interaction column, previously equilibrated with 20 mM sodium acetate pH 4.2 containing 10% (*w/v*) ammonium sulfate, using a flow rate of 1mL/min. The column was washed with the same buffer and the bacteriocin was then eluted with ethanol/start buffer 70:30. One mL fractions were collected and their anti-*Listeria monocytogenes* activity was evaluated by the in-liquid assay.

Purified nisin and sakacin were checked by Tricine-SDS-PAGE as described by Schägger (2006) [43] in Mini-PROTEAN Tetra Cell with Mini-Protean Tricine precast gels. Samples were quantified by the Bradford assay [41] and diluted in the sample buffer (12% SDS (*w/v*), 6% mercaptoethanol (*v/v*), 30% glycerol (*w/v*), 0.05% Coomassie Blue, 150 mM Tris-HCl pH 7) in order to load into the gels 5 µg of proteins. Molecular weight markers were from PageRuler Low range unstained protein ladder. The gels were stained with colloidal Coomassie Blue [44,45].

## 2.7. Evaluation of the Proteolytic Ability Towards Caseins

In order to identify the decrypted peptides from caseins, the strains were grown at 30 °C in a Chemical Defined Medium (CDM) as reported previously [46], with some differences; 100 time less valine, isoleucine, leucine amino acids and enriched with 0.5 g/L bovine caseins. Samples were collected in the late exponential phase by centrifugation at 4000× g, for 20 min, at 4 °C. The supernatants were filtrated using Vivacel 250 membrane filter (cut-off 5 kDa) and subsequently lyophilized. In order to screen the strain for their hydrolytic potential towards caseins, lyophilized samples were resuspended in water and peptide release was calculated by measuring the primary amines (–NH₂) released, using a microplate analysis based on the reaction of ortho-phthal dialdehyde (OPA) and DTT, following the protocol reported by Deglaire et al. (2019) [47]. Only the strains with –NH₂ released up to 300 mg/L were considered for the MS analysis.
## 2.8. Protein Identification of SDS-PAGE Bands and Analyses on Decrypted Peptides by MALDI-TOF/TOF

Protein digestion from SDS-PAGE bands was carried out as previously described by Nebbia et al., (2019) [48]. The resulting peptide mixtures were analyzed by a Ultraflex III MALDI-TOF/TOF instrument, as already described [49]. Manual/visual evaluation of the mass spectra was performed using Flex Analysis software. MASCOT software (www.matrixscience.co) version 2.4.0 was used for the protein identification against UniProtKB database, with the taxonomy restriction to Other Firmicutes. The MASCOT search parameters were: "trypsin" as enzyme, allowing up to 3 missed cleavages, carbamidomethyl on cysteine residues as fixed modification, oxidation of methionine as variable modifications. The peptide mass tolerance was 30 ppm.

For the analyses of the decrypted peptides from caseins, lyophilized samples containing peptide mixture were dissolved in 25 mM NH₄HCO₃, at the concentration of 10 mg/mL and analyzed by a Ultraflex III MALDI-TOF/TOF instrument as already mentioned. The spectra were searched with MS-non-specific software (http://prospector.ucsf.edu/prospector/mshome.htm) using an in-house bovine casein database (UniProt accession number: P02668, P02666, P02663 and P02662). The peptide mass tolerance was set at 30 ppm.

## 2.9. *In Silico* Analyses of the Identified Peptides

The bioactivity potential of the identified peptide was searched by the MBPDB online database (http://mbpdb.nws.oregonstate.edu/) [50]. The similarity threshold was set to 100% and the amino acid scoring matrix was set to identity.

## 2.10. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.0.2. Results were analysed using the one-way ANOVA. Normality of the residuals was assessed by means of Shapiro-Wilk's test. Where significance was assessed, post hoc tests were conducted using Tukey's multiple comparison post hoc test. Differences were considered significant at a minimum *p* value of 0.05.

# 3. Results and Discussion

## 3.1. *Screening for Anti-Listeria Active LAB*

Fourteen LAB strains isolated from both cheese and fermented sausages and one strain, *L. lactis* MG1363, belonging to the culture collection of LISBP (Toulouse, France) were grown in liquid media. Once reached the end-logarithmic phase, cultures were centrifuged and the supernatant tested against a culture of *L. monocytogenes* to detect a possible inhibitory action. As shown in Table 1, only four strains were active against the target bacterium, namely *L. sakei* I151, *L. lactis* SN12, *L. lactis* SN17, and *L. lactis* 41FLL. Further investigations have been performed on these 4 strains. Twenty-one LAB isolated from brewer's grains, all belonging to the genera *Lactobacillus* and *Pediococcus* were able to inhibit *Listeria monocytogenes* growth in vitro [51]. In agreement with this finding, a recent report describes the efficacy of two LAB species, namely *Lactobacillus plantarum* and *Pediococcus pentosaceus* in reducing the amount of *Listeria monocytogenes* on cantaloupes whose consumption is cause of severe illnesses, hospitalization, and deaths [10]. A bacteriocinogenic strain of *Enterococcus* has been reported to be able to reduce *Listeria monocytogenes* contamination of meat especially at the presence of NaCl and ascorbic acid [52]. In addition, a review by [53] illustrates that control of listeriosis in meat can be obtained especially by means of LAB bacteriocins.
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Percentage of *L. monocytogenes* inhibition (pre- and post-proteinase K digestion), acidification profiles and LDH activity for the two control-strains not displaying antibacterial activity (*L. acidophilus* 41R and *L. lactis* MG1363) and for the four strains (*L. lactis* SN12, *L. lactis* SN17, *L. sakei* I151 and *L. lactis* 41FLL3) interfering with the growth of *L. monocytogenes*. Data represent means ± standard deviations (N = 3). Statistics: ANOVA *p* < 0.001 (**); *p* > 0.05 (ns). Tukey's post hoc tests were performed and letters indicate significant differences between strains.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>L. acidophilus<br>41R</th><th>L. lactis<br>MG1363</th><th>L. lactis<br>SN12</th><th>L. lactis<br>SN17</th><th>L. sakei<br>I151</th><th>L. lactis<br>41FLL3</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>L. monocytogenes<br>inhibition (%)</td><td>0.00 ± 0.11 <sup>a</sup></td><td>0.00 ± 0.13 <sup>a</sup></td><td>83.20 ± 3.02 <sup>b</sup></td><td>85.10 ± 2.30 <sup>b</sup></td><td>60.03 ± 1.21 <sup>c</sup></td><td>55.03 ± 2.02 <sup>c</sup></td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>L. monocytogenes<br>inhibition post<br>proteinase K<br>digestion (%)</td><td>0.00 ± 0.10 <sup>a</sup></td><td>0.00 ± 0.11 <sup>a</sup></td><td>84.20 ± 2.51 <sup>b</sup></td><td>86.10 ± 1.30 <sup>b</sup></td><td>3.30 ± 0.81 <sup>c</sup></td><td>4.30 ± 1.19 <sup>c</sup></td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>Time (h)</td><td colspan="6">pH</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>6.64 ± 0.05</td><td>6.64 ± 0.10</td><td>6.65 ± 0.10</td><td>6.71 ± 0.10</td><td>6.72 ± 0.10</td><td>6.56 ± 0.10</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>6.61 ± 0.03 <sup>a</sup></td><td>6.55 ± 0.03 <sup>c</sup></td><td>6.63 ± 0.02 <sup>ad</sup></td><td>6.68 ± 0.01 <sup>bd</sup></td><td>6.69 ± 0.01 <sup>d</sup></td><td>6.57 ± 0.01 <sup>ac</sup></td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>6.59 ± 0.03 <sup>a</sup></td><td>6.57 ± 0.01 <sup>a</sup></td><td>6.62 ± 0.03 <sup>abd</sup></td><td>6.66 ± 0.01 <sup>b</sup></td><td>6.65 ± 0.01 <sup>bd</sup></td><td>6.45 ± 0.02 <sup>c</sup></td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>6.58 ± 0.02 <sup>a</sup></td><td>6.51 ± 0.02 <sup>d</sup></td><td>6.59 ± 0.02 <sup>a</sup></td><td>6.64 ± 0.02 <sup>b</sup></td><td>6.63 ± 0.02 <sup>ab</sup></td><td>6.35 ± 0.01 <sup>c</sup></td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>6.55 ± 0.01 <sup>a</sup></td><td>6.37 ± 0.01 <sup>b</sup></td><td>5.93 ± 0.01 <sup>c</sup></td><td>6.61 ± 0.01 <sup>d</sup></td><td>6.60 ± 0.01 <sup>e</sup></td><td>6.24 ± 0.01 <sup>f</sup></td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>6.52 ± 0.01 <sup>a</sup></td><td>6.24 ± 0.02 <sup>b</sup></td><td>4.95 ± 0.01 <sup>c</sup></td><td>5.02 ± 0.02 <sup>d</sup></td><td>6.59 ± 0.01 <sup>e</sup></td><td>6.09 ± 0.01 <sup>f</sup></td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>24</td><td>5.29 ± 0.02 <sup>a</sup></td><td>5.00 ± 0.01 <sup>b</sup></td><td>4.17 ± 0.02 <sup>c</sup></td><td>4.21 ± 0.02 <sup>c</sup></td><td>4.96 ± 0.04 <sup>b</sup></td><td>4.98 ± 0.03 <sup>b</sup></td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>LDH activity<br>(U/mL of cell<br>lysate/g protein)</td><td>10.02 ± 0.07 <sup>a</sup></td><td>9.98 ± 0.05 <sup>a</sup></td><td>32.02 ± 3.63 <sup>b</sup></td><td>29.07 ± 0.38 <sup>b</sup></td><td>15.26 ± 0.05 <sup>c</sup></td><td>14.33 ± 0.09 <sup>c</sup></td><td>***</td></tr></tbody></table>

### 3.2. Screening of LAB for Bacteriocin Production and LDH Activity

Based on the hypothesis that a specific inhibitory activity on *L. monocytogenes* can be achieved by means of antimicrobial peptides, namely bacteriocins, bacterial supernatants from the four interfering strains were treated with proteinase K and the interfering activity measured again. Actually, for two of the four strains inhibiting *L. monocytogenes* growth, namely, *L. sakei* I151 and *L. lactis* 41FLL, the interfering activity was lost after protease treatment, thus suggesting that growth inhibition can be ascribed to proteinaceous molecules (Table 1). Excluding any bacteriocin production for the strains retaining antimicrobial activity after proteinase treatment (*L. lactis* SN12 and *L. lactis* SN17), and assuming that acidification can prevent *L. monocytogenes* growth [54], we evaluated medium pH and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity. As shown in Table 1, time-course acidification has been comparatively evaluated for the four interfering LAB and for 2 negative control strains (*L. lactis* MG1363 and *L. acidophilus* 41R). *L. lactis* SN12 and *L. lactis* SN17, showed an increased acidification after 24 h, reaching a pH of about 4. On the contrary, *L. sakei* I151 and *L. lactis* 41FLL displayed an acidification profile very similar to the control strains: maintaining a pH around 5.0 after 24 hrs. To ascertain if the pH lowering observed for *L. lactis* SN12 and *L. lactis* SN17 was due to increased lactic acid accumulation and hence to an enhanced catalysis, LDH activity was assessed. The data referred in Table 1 underline that the two strains responsible of significant pH lowering both possess a catalytically very efficient LDH as compared to the other tested strains. Furthermore, the two interfering strains (*L. sakei* I151 and *L. lactis* 41FLL) which induced a slight acidification, showed lower values of catalytic activity than *L. lactis* SN12 and *L. lactis* SN17, as expected. Therefore, the latter belong to the so-called high lactic acid producers that inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria by means of environment pH lowering described by Lado and Yousef [54].
Based on the assumption that the lost antibacterial activity detected for *L. sakei* I151 and *L. lactis* 41FLL following protease treatment is linked to specific antibacterial compounds, namely bacteriocins, further analyses aimed to partially characterize and purify the inhibiting molecules were performed on these two strains.

### 3.3. *Searching for Specific Antimicrobial Molecules: Bacteriocin Investigation*

First, we excluded the presence of folded proteins (bacteriolysins) by treating the supernatants of *L. lactis* 41FLL and *L. sakei* I151 at 90 °C. This procedure did not affect the inhibitory potential of cell-free supernatants (data not shown) thus supporting evidence for a peptide molecule. Considering that *L. lactis* is a good nisin producer, the genes for nisin were targeted after PCR in the strain *L. lactis* 41FLL. As shown in Figure 1, the NisZ band is clearly detectable in agarose gel. The most studied bacteriocin produced by LAB is Nisin A, which has been approved by the World Health Organization as food preservative. Nisin Z, a natural variant of Nisin A, was firstly isolated from *L. lactis* ssp. *lactis* NIZO 22186 by Mulders and co-workers (1991) [55]. Nisin Z differs from Nisin A for the presence of an asparagine instead of a histidine in position 27. This substitution has no effect on the antimicrobial activity, although the increased solubility of Nisin Z at pH 7.0 can offer greater potential applications at neutral pH [56].

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Identification of the NisZ gene at 174 bp, for the strain *L. lactis* 41FLL. M = molecular markers, Lane 1 = *L. lactis* 41FLL, Lane 2 = negative control.</figcaption></figure>

Besides being employed directly as biocontrol agents, LAB can also be exploited as cell factories for the production of antimicrobial molecules. Hence, purification strategies for Nisin Z were set up. Supernatants from *L. lactis* 41FLL3 cultures were fractionated by a cation exchange chromatography. The fraction displaying the highest inhibitory attitude (55%) was quantified by the Bradford assay. The total produced nisin Z content was 2.32 mg/L (Table 2). Since it has been reported that environmental factors can account for better production of interfering molecules [57], in order to improve the bacteriocin
yield, some culture parameters were changed. When the bacterial growth temperature was enhanced from 30 to 37 °C, the anti-*L. monocytogenes* activity of the purified Nisin Z increased from 55% up to 65%, although the purification yield was the same as the one measured at 37 °C (around 2 mg/L). Then, both glucose and fructose (in addition the M17 intrinsic lactose) were tested as sugar source for bacterial growth at 37 °C, because the importance of the sugar substrate in affecting bacteriocin production was previously described in the literature [58]. Both sugars were able to enhance the anti-*Listeria* activity of the 37 °C grown-cultures reaching around 95% of inhibition on *L. monocytogenes* growth. Furthermore, a remarkable enhancement of Nisin Z production was also assessed for both fructose- and glucose-fortified cultures, reaching 14.95 mg/L and of 10.55 mg/L of Nisin Z respectively.

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Percentage of L. monocytogenes inhibition by purified Nisin Z produced by *L. lactis* 41FLL3 grown at two different temperatures (30 and 37 °C) and with two different carbon sources (glucose and fructose) and Nisin Z purification yields (mg/L). Data represent means ± standard deviations (N = 3). Statistics: ANOVA *p* < 0.001 (**). Tukey's post hoc tests were performed and letters indicate significant differences between strains.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>L. lactis 41FLL3<br>30 °C</th><th>L. lactis 41FLL3<br>37 °C</th><th>L. lactis 41FLL3<br>37 °C + Glucose<br>(2% w/v)</th><th>L. lactis 41FLL3<br>37 °C + Fructose<br>(2% w/v)</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>L. monocytogenes<br>inhibition (%)</td><td>55.10 ± 1.19 <sup>a</sup></td><td>65.22 ± 1.09 <sup>b</sup></td><td>95.21 ± 1.89 <sup>c</sup></td><td>95.01 ± 1.60 <sup>c</sup></td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>Nisin Z purification yield<br>(mg/L)</td><td>2.32 ± 0.51 <sup>a</sup></td><td>1.90 ± 0.31 <sup>a</sup></td><td>10.55 ± 1.49 <sup>b</sup></td><td>14.95 ± 1.79 <sup>c</sup></td><td>***</td></tr></tbody></table>

The effectiveness of Nisin Z purification was evaluated by Tricine SDS-PAGE (Figure 2, panel A). As shown in Figure 2 (Panel A-1) the fraction purified from the fructose-enriched cultures is visualized as a single band with the typical molecular weight of Nisin Z (4.5 kDa). The fractions purified from the glucose-enriched cultures (Figure 2, Panel A-2) showed an additional band at a molecular weight of about 13 kDa. To confirm the presence of Nisin Z in the lower MW band and to identify the protein contained in the second band, a MS analysis was performed. The band at lower molecular weight was identified as Nisin Z (UniProt entry P29559), the higher molecular weight band as the phosphocarrier protein HPr (UniProt entry P29559), a membrane transporter belonging to the PTS (phosphotransferase) system which is involved in sugar uptake and whose expression is generally induced by glucose [59].

The enhanced abundance of Nisin Z under specific growth conditions (37 °C, presence of glucose or fructose) is in agreement with data indicating that environmental factors can modulate the biosynthesis of this bacteriocin. Actually, nisin synthesis is regulated by a two-component regulatory system made up of the membrane-bound histidine kinase sensor protein NisK and the regulator NisR [60]. In particular, glucose-inducing effect on bacteriocin production has been demonstrated in *Enterococcus* [61], and in *L. lactis* as well, whereas fructose-inducing effect was observed in *Pediococcus* [62]. The high yield of nisin Z obtained in these modified growth conditions, together with the efficacy of a simple, cheap and quick one-step purification render this process potentially suitable for industrial applications. Actually, among antibacterial compounds, bacteriocins [34] are the most promising for industrial use. In fermented food, they can be produced in situ as a consequence of the bacterial metabolism. Alternatively, they can be added directly to food in a semi-purified form, however in this case their antimicrobial activity may be lost due to inactivation by food components, such as proteases and lipids [63]. More recently, the possibility to immobilize bacteriocins directly into the food packaging started to be explored since the polymer can protect bacteriocins from inactivation [63,64]. Active packaging was defined as "a type of packaging that changes the condition of the packaging to extend shelf-life or improve safety or sensory properties while maintaining the quality of
the food” (European FAIR-project CT 98-4170) [65]. The concept of active packaging has been introduced as a response to the current consumer demands of healthy food (avoiding use of preservatives, high sugar, high salt) and in agreement with market trends aimed to counteract energy waste by the continuous cold-chain need [66]. Several studies verified the effectiveness of antimicrobial packaging material in inhibiting the development of a mi-crobial strain inoculated into food [67,68]. Successful bacteriocin-functionalized packaging is still not widely available due to problems linked to the immobilization procedure that must ensure bacteriocin diffusion into polymers and gradual migration of the antimicrobial compound into food, without loss of activity [1] over time, during transport and storage of the end-products [69]. However, the true bottleneck is the difficulty to have high amounts of purified bacteriocins. Therefore, the highly active Nisin Z, directly purified from the culture medium, could be further immobilized into food packaging according to a new and challenging technology [70]. The use of antimicrobial films containing nisin Z could improve the quality, microbial safety and shelf-life of food products. In the literature, there are some reports dealing with the potential efficiency of nisin-based active packaging. A nisin-containing cellophane coating reduced viable counts of total aerobic bacteria in fresh veal meat stored at 8 °C [71], and an active packaging obtained from nisin-treated film inhibited *Micrococcus luteus* ATCC 10240 in broth as well as in raw milk and pasteurized milk during storage [72]. Finally, one of the advantages of bacterial-derived antimicrobial agents is their low induction of acquired resistance phenomena: nisin itself, is in use since 1953, and no (or very few) resistant strains have been described [30].

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Tricine-SDS-PAGE Coomassie stained gel of purified Nisin Z and Sakacin P. Panel (A): antimicrobial fractions of *L. lactis* 41FLL3 grown in M17 enriched with fructose (2% *w/v*) (1) and with glucose (2% *w/v*) (2). Panel (B): antimicrobial fraction of *L. sakei* I151 after purification with cation exchange column (3) and hydrophobic interaction column (4). M: marker.</figcaption></figure>

For *L. sakei* I151, sakacin was hypothesized as the most abundant and most fre-
quently produced bacterocin. Conversely with what observed in *L. reuteri* that can
produce different interfering molecules ranging from 100 to 2700 Da (see introduction)
and in *L. lactis* where a large variety of bacteriocins occur such as lactococcins [73], lac-
ticin [74] and nisin [60], *L. sakei* mainly produces sakacins. The first discovered was sakacin
A [75] but later other very similar bacteriocins like sakacin B [76], sakacin K [77], sakacin G [78], the chromosomally-encoded sakacin T and sakacin X [79], sakacin P [80], sakacin LSJ618 [81] and sakacin C2 [82] have been described.

Sakacins are class IIa bacteriocins characterized by the amino acid sequence motif YGNGVXCXXXXCXV (in which X is any amino acid) in the hydrophilic, cationic N-terminal “pediocin box” [83]. Even in this case, the possibility to purify sakacin for further immobilization into the food packaging was explored [65]. Hence, sakacin was purified from *L. sakei* I151 supernatants by a two-step method, coupling cation exchange with hydrophobic interaction chromatography. After the first purification step, the two fractions displaying the highest anti-*L. monocytogenes* activity (85% and 75%, respectively) were pooled and separated by Tricine-SDS-PAGE. As shown in Figure 2 (Panel B-3), the pooled fractions were not properly purified, and then were further submitted to hydrophobic interaction chromatography. As shown in the Panel B-4, we obtained an improved purification. The purified bacteriocin was identified by MS analysis as sakacin P (UniProt entry P35618). However, due to the low purification yield (1.4 mg/L) and lower antimicrobial activity (65%) as compared to the original fractions, and to the need of cheap, fast and simple methods of purifications for industrial applications, further projects on sakacin were dismissed. On the other hand, successful bacteriocin-functionalized packaging is still not widely available due to the difficulty to have high amounts of purified bacteriocins without loss of activity over time, during transport and storage of the food product [70]. In case, also partially purified fractions of active bacteriocins can be used, provided that high antibacterial activity is present. Actually, some studies confirmed the effectiveness of semipurified bacteriocins immobilized into functionalized antimicrobial packaging in inhibiting the development of microbial strains inoculated into food [66,67].

### 3.4. *Evaluation of the Ability to Decrypt Antimicrobial Peptides*

A further aim of this work was to assess if some of the 14 strains were able to obtain an indirect antimicrobial effect by decrypting antibacterial peptides from casein, being most of them of dairy origin. The objectives were: (i) evaluating the proteolytic activity towards casein; (ii) if this occurred, analyzing the resulting peptides by MS and; (iii) searching for bioactive peptides screening *online* in MBPDB peptide database. LAB are known for having an efficient and complex proteolytic system evolved during their adaptation to the milk ecological niche (and parallel involution of their amino acid synthetic capability), and therefore well-fitting with casein [1].

*L. lactis* MG1363, *L. rhamnosus* 17D10 and *L. helveticus* 4D5 showed to be the highest peptide producers as determined by OPA quantification of the supernatants harvested in late exponential phase (data not shown). These three strains were able to hydrolyze all the casein added to the culture medium (Figure 3). In particular, the αs1- and αs2-caseins were the best targets for the three strains in study. For instance, for *L. helveticus* 4D5, 40% of the released peptides were originated from αs1-casein. As regards to the other two caseins, β-casein was mostly hydrolyzed by *L. rhamnosus* 17D10 and *L. helveticus* 4D5, while k-casein and αs2-casein were mostly hydrolyzed by *L. lactis* MG1363. The list of the peptides identified by MS analysis is available as Table S1 in Supplementary Material.
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Percentage of casein-derived peptides harvested in the late exponential phase of *L. lactis* MG1363, *L. rhamnosus* 17D10 and *L. helveticus* 4D5 growth curves.</figcaption></figure>

As shown in Figure 4, all the three strains were able to hydrolyze even the central part of beta-casein reported to be the most resistant to proteolytic attack because of an alpha helix conformation [84]. Moreover, the same authors analyzed the proteolytic potential of some *L. helveticus* strains towards caseins and found that only certain domains, such as N-and C-terminus of αs1-casein that do not possess a true secondary structure, are suitable for hydrolysis. However, in the present investigation also the central part of the primary structure of αs1-casein was recognized by *L. helveticus* proteolytic system. Furthermore, the three strains displayed specificity of action since they released different peptides from αs1, αs2 and kappa caseins, suggesting that the target on the molecule was different. These results strongly indicate that the surface-bound proteases of these three strains are different in their mechanism of action. The selectivity of LAB proteolytic system towards specific amino acid sequences was previously described [85].

Peptides released by the strains in study were compared to known bioactive peptides reported in the data banks to find possible bioactivities. All the three strains were able to release bioactive peptides (Table 3). As far as antibacterial activity is concerned, four peptides showing 100% sequence identity to ascertained antimicrobial peptides were found, one of them being shared between *L. lactis* MG1363 and *L. helveticus* 4D5.
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Peptide coverage of the four caseins digested by *L. lactis* MG1363 (black), *L. rhamnosus* 17D10 (red) and *L. helveticus* 4D5 (green). Peptides with established bioactivity are underlined in yellow.</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 3.** List of the identified bioactive peptides released by *L. lactis* MG1363, *L. rhamnosus* 17D10 and *L. helveticus* 4D5.</caption><thead><tr><th>Sequence</th><th>Activity</th><th>Protein Precursor</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">L. lactis MG1363</td></tr><tr><td>YLGYLE</td><td>Opioid</td><td>αs1-casein (aa106-111)</td><td>[86]</td></tr><tr><td>LEQLRLKKY</td><td>Antimicrobial</td><td>αs1-casein (aa110-119)</td><td>[87]</td></tr><tr><td>AMKPWIQPK</td><td>ACE-inhibitory</td><td>αs2-casein (aa204-2012)</td><td>[88]</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">L. rhamnosus 17D10</td></tr><tr><td>RPKHPIKHQ</td><td>ACE-inhibitory</td><td>αs1-casein (aa16-24)</td><td>[89]</td></tr><tr><td>TKKTKLTEEEKNRL</td><td>Antimicrobial</td><td>αs2-casein (aa163-176)</td><td>[90]</td></tr><tr><td>VENLHLPLPLL</td><td>ACE-inhibitory</td><td>β-casein (aa145-155)</td><td>[91]</td></tr><tr><td>YQEPVLGPVRGPFPI</td><td>Antimicrobial</td><td>β-casein (aa206-220)</td><td>[92]</td></tr><tr><td>QEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV</td><td>ACE-inhibitory</td><td>β-casein (aa209-224)</td><td>[93]</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">L. helveticus 4D5</td></tr><tr><td>YLGYLE</td><td>Opioid</td><td>αs1-casein (aa106-111)</td><td>[86]</td></tr><tr><td>LEQLRLKKY</td><td>Antimicrobial</td><td>αs1-casein (aa110-119)</td><td>[87]</td></tr><tr><td>QKALNEINQF</td><td>Antimicrobial</td><td>αs2-casein (aa94-103)</td><td>[90]</td></tr><tr><td>MPFPKYPVEP</td><td>ACE-inhibitory</td><td>β-casein (aa124-133)</td><td>[94]</td></tr></tbody></table>

*L. lactis* MG1363 and *L. helveticus* 4D5 released the antimicrobial peptide LEQLRLKKY from αs1-casein. This peptide was previously investigated by [87] that performed an in silico screening for the antibacterial activity of 248 peptides in bovine milk. LEQLRLKKY was synthetized and tested in vitro against *E. coli* NEB 5, *B. subtilis* ATCC 6051 and *E. coli* ATCC 25922, showing inhibitory effect only towards the first two strains.

From the αs2-casein, *L. rhamnosus* 17D10 and *L. helveticus* 4D5 were able to decrypt other two antimicrobial peptides TKKTKLTEEEKNR and QKALNEINQF, respectively. Both peptides proved to have multifunctional biological properties, e.g., prolyl endopeptidase inhibition, ACE-inhibition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity [90]. This behavior is due to overlapping regions called “strategic zones” able to exert the already mentioned biological activities. Moreover, a very flexible and dynamic structural conformation could further explain this multifunctional feature. As regards antimicrobial activity, peptide QKALNEINQF showed a higher effectiveness against all the tested strains (*Bacillus cereus*, *S. aureus*, *L. monocytogenes* and *Helicobacter pylori*) when compared to TKKTKLTEEEKNRL [90].

The last antimicrobial peptide (YQEPVLGPVRGPFPI) was decrypted by *L. rhamnosus* 17D10 from β-casein and was consistent with the well-known casecidin. It was isolated by Birkemo and co-workers [95] as naturally present peptide in bovine colostrum and its antimicrobial activity was tested against *E. coli* DH5α. This peptide was also obtained from caprine beta-casein after in vitro digestion with human gastrointestinal enzymes and its antibacterial activity was observed against *E. coli* K12 but not against *B. cereus* RT INF01 and *L. monocytogenes* [92].

In addition to peptides with antimicrobial effect, other informational peptides displaying different biological activities were found. This is of interest since some nutraceutical applications of bioactive peptides originating by microbial hydrolysis were described [35]. Five sequences showed a 100% of sequence identity to ACE-inhibitory peptides. Among them, three were released by *L. rhamnosus* 17D10 (RPKHPIKHQ, VENLHLPLPLL and QEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV), one by *L. lactis* MG1363 (AMKPWIQPK) and one by *L. helveticus* 4D5 (MPFPKYPVEP). ACE-inhibitors bioactive peptides from milk have gained attention in the formulation of new food products having antihypertensive properties and the strains able to produce ACE-inhibitor peptides are currently added to fermented dairy products [96]. The ACE-inhibitor peptide RPKHPIKHQ, released from αs1-casein by *L. rhamnosus* 17D10, was previously found by Saito et al. [89] in Gouda cheese and a significant hypotensive activity was demonstrated. The peptide VENLHLPLPLL, derived
from β-casein hydrolysis by *L. rhamnosus* 17D10, was discovered by [91] after *L. helveticus*
NCC2765 hydrolysis of skimmed milk and its resistance to pepsin and pancreatin digestion
was demonstrated. Another peptide produced from β-casein by *L. rhamnosus* 17D10 was
QEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV, already described as ACE-inhibitor peptide from Cheddar cheese
by Lu et al. [93]. The AMKPWIQPK peptide, released from the αs2-casein by *L. lactis*
MG1363 was previously found by Maeno et al. [88] after caseinate hydrolysis carried out
by *L. helveticus* CP790. This peptide has the ability to induce a slightly decrease in the
systolic blood pressure. *L. helveticus* 4D5 was able to decrypt the peptide MPFPKYPVEP
from β-casein. As described by Hayes et al. [94], this peptide proved to have a strong
ACE-inhibitory activity during in vitro tests and to be resistant to gastrointestinal digestive
enzymes as well.

Finally, *L. lactis* MG1363 and *L. helveticus* 4D5 were also able to release the peptide YLGYLE from αs1-casein, which shows 100% sequence identity to an already known opioid peptide, previously identified from pepsin digestion of casein and named bovine α-casein exorphin [97]. This peptide is characterized by a negative charge conferring a weak affinity to μ- or δ-opioid receptors when compared to endogenous endorphins. More recently, Martínez-Maqueda and co-workers [86] suggested that its reduced opioid effect could be due to the hydrolytic activity of the intestinal peptidases that partially inactivate the peptide.

**4. Conclusions**

In the present study, besides the presence of naturally occurring high lactic acid
producers, both bacteriocin and antimicrobial peptide (resulting from casein hydrolysis)
producers have been detected from a pool of food-isolated LAB. Both these antibacterial
compounds have gained great attention in recent years due to their low toxicity and
large availability. From one side, they are appreciated in the food industry as natural
preservatives, counteracting undesired contamination (resulting in food spoilage and shelf-
life shortening) and controlling food-borne infections. This allows to reduce chemical
preservatives and the amount of sugar and salt with excellent benefits for diabetics, obese
and hypertensive subjects also supporting sustainable food storage with a lower need of the
cold-chain. From the other side, their stability in blood and serum render them promising
infection control agents and, after suitable modification or encapsulation or immobilization
in polymeric matrices, they could represent a valuable strategy also for treating systemic
infections. Furthermore, the present research has highlighted the potential of the proteolytic
system of food-isolated lactic acid bacteria in decrypting also antihypertensive and opioid
peptides useful as nutraceutical supplements to treat mild hypertension and children
insomnia respectively. In the nutraceutical era, every effort directed to extend the number
of natural compounds available is of interest. To reach these goals, the road is still long and
winding and the present results, although circumscribed to *L. monocytogenes*, can add a
further contribution in highlighting the richness of opportunities that LAB can offer, due to
their plasticity, adaptability to changing conditions and because of their long history in
food production.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/9/1/65/s1, Table S1: List of peptides identified by MS analysis.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, E.P. and M.C.-B.; methodology, S.N., G.L.B. and V.L.; validation, C.L., E.P. and M.G.G.; formal analysis, S.N., C.L., S.C. and M.G.G.; investigation, S.N., C.L. and S.C.; resources, M.G.G., M.C.-B. and L.C.; data curation, S.N., C.L. and M.G.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.C., C.L., M.G.G. and E.P.; writing—review and editing, V.L., S.C., E.P. and C.L.; supervision, M.C.-B. and M.G.G.; project administration, M.C.-B. and E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research project has been achieved with the financial support of the University of Torino, Italy (Fondi Ricerca Locale ex 60%). SN beneficiated of an Erasmus student exchange between
the universities of Torino and Toulouse and some experimental parts have been performed in the context of this agreement.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

**References**

1. Pessione, E. Lactic Acid Bacteria Contribution to Gut Microbiota Complexity: Lights and Shadows. *Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.* **2012**, *2*, 86. [CrossRef]

2. Mackowiak, P.A. Recycling Metchnikoff: Probiotics, the Intestinal Microbiome and the Quest for Long Life. *Front. Public Health* **2013**, *1*. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Quinto, E.J.; Jiménez, P.; Caro, I.; Tejero, J.; Mateo, J.; Girbés, T. Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria: A Review. *Food Nutr. Sci.* **2014**, *5*, 1765–1775. [CrossRef]

4. Lamberti, C.; Mangiapane, E.; Pessione, A.; Mazzoli, R.; Giunta, C.; Pessione, E. Proteomic Characterization of a Selenium-Metabolizing Probiotic *Lactobacillus Reuteri* Lb2 BM for Nutraceutical Applications. *Proteomics* **2011**, *11*, 2212–2221. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5. Dicks, L.; Botes, M. Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Gastro-Intestinal Tract: Health Benefits, Safety and Mode of Action. *Benef. Microbes* **2010**, *1*, 11–29. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Perdigón, G.; Fuller, R.; Raya, R. Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Effect-on the Immune System. *Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol.* **2001**, *2*, 27–42. [PubMed]

7. Mazzoli, R.; Pessione, E. The Neuro-Endocrinological Role of Microbial Glutamate and GABA Signaling. *Front. Microbiol.* **2016**, *7*. [CrossRef]

8. Odeyemi, O.A.; Alegbeleye, O.O.; Strateva, M.; Stratev, D. Understanding Spoilage Microbial Community and Spoilage Mechanisms in Foods of Animal Origin. *Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.* **2020**, *19*, 311–331. [CrossRef]

9. Castro, R.C.S.; de Oliveira, A.P.D.; de Souza, E.A.R.; Correia, T.M.A.; de Souza, J.V.; Dias, F.S. Lactic Acid Bacteria as Biological Control of Staphylococcus Aureus in Goat “Coalho” Cheese. *Food Technol. Biotechnol.* **2018**, *56*, 431–440. [CrossRef]

10. Yin, H.-B.; Chen, C.-H.; Boomer, A.; Byun, S.; Venkitanarayanan, K.; Macarisin, D.; Patel, J. Biocontrol of *Listeria* on Cantaloupes with Lactic Acid Bacteria. *J. Food Process. Preserv.* **2020**, *44*, e14465. [CrossRef]

11. Mokoena, M.P. Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Bacteriocins: Classification, Biosynthesis and Applications against Uropathogens: A Mini-Review. *Molecules* **2017**, *22*, 1255. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. Breithaupt, H. Tackling Resistence: Bacteria, Humans, Animals and the Environment: An Interview with Stuart Levy, Professor at Tufts University School of Medicine and President of the Alliance for the Prudent Use of Antibiotics. *EMBO Rep.* **2014**, *15*, 127–130. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Ben, Y.; Fu, C.; Hu, M.; Liu, L.; Wong, M.H.; Zheng, C. Human Health Risk Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance Associated with Antibiotic Residues in the Environment: A Review. *Environ. Res.* **2019**, *169*, 483–493. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14. Lamberti, C.; Genovese, F.; Coisson, J.D.; Bianco, G.L.; Cocolin, L.; Pessione, E. Anti-S. Aureus and Anti-L. Monocytogenes Molecules Produced by Cheese-Isolated Lactic Acid Bacteria. *Czech J. Food Sci.* **2014**, *32*, 7. [CrossRef]

15. Zaman, S.B.; Hussain, M.A.; Nye, R.; Mehta, V.; Mamun, K.T.; Hossain, N. A Review on Antibiotic Resistance: Alarm Bells Are Ringing. *Cureus* **2017**. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16. Le Ouay, B.; Stellacci, F. Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles: A Surface Science Insight. *Nano Today* **2015**, *10*, 339–354. [CrossRef]

17. Viscardi, G.; Quagliotto, P.; Barolo, C.; Savarino, P.; Barni, E.; Fisicaro, E. Synthesis and Surface and Antimicrobial Properties of Novel Cationic Surfactants. *J. Org. Chem.* **2000**, *65*, 8197–8203. [CrossRef]

18. Burt, S. Essential Oils: Their Antibacterial Properties and Potential Applications in Foods—A Review. *Int. J. Food Microbiol.* **2004**, *94*, 223–253. [CrossRef]

19. Adhya, S.; Merril, C.R.; Biswas, B. Therapeutic and Prophylactic Applications of Bacteriophage Components in Modern Medicine. *Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med.* **2014**, *4*, a012518. [CrossRef]

20. Lin, D.M.; Koskella, B.; Lin, H.C. Phage Therapy: An Alternative to Antibiotics in the Age of Multi-Drug Resistance. *World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther.* **2017**, *8*, 162. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

21. Makras, L.; Triantafyllou, V.; Fayol-Messaoudi, D.; Adriany, T.; Zoumpopoulou, G.; Tsakalidou, E.; Servin, A.; De Vuyst, L. Kinetic Analysis of the Antibacterial Activity of Probiotic Lactobacilli towards Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium Reveals a Role for Lactic Acid and Other Inhibitory Compounds. *Res. Microbiol.* **2006**, *157*, 241–247. [CrossRef]

22. Pacheco, A.R.; Sperandio, V. Shiga Toxin in Enterohemorrhagic *E. coli*: Regulation and Novel Anti-Virulence Strategies. *Front. Cell. Inf. Microbiol.* **2012**, *2*. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23. Cech, N.B.; Horswill, A.R. Small-Molecule Quorum Quenchers to Prevent *Staphylococcus aureus* Infection. *Future Microbiol.* **2013**, *8*, 1511–1514. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Cotter, P.D.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. Bacteriocins—A Viable Alternative to Antibiotics? *Nat. Rev. Microbiol.* **2013**, *11*, 95–105. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25. Engels, C.; Schwab, C.; Zhang, J.; Stevens, M.J.A.; Bieri, C.; Ebert, M.-O.; McNeill, K.; Sturla, S.J.; Lacroix, C. Acrolein Contributes Strongly to Antimicrobial and Heterocyclic Amine Transformation Activities of Reuterin. *Sci. Rep.* **2016**, *6*, 36246. [CrossRef]
26. Gänzle, M.G.; Höltzel, A.; Walter, J.; Jung, G.; Hammes, W.P. Characterization of Reutericyclin Produced by Lactobacillus Reuteri LTH2584. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **2000**, *66*, 4325–4333. [CrossRef]

27. Toba, T.; Samant, S.K.; Yoshioka, E.; Itoh, T. Reutericin 6, a New Bacteriocin Produced by Lactobacillus Reuteri LA 6. *Lett. Appl. Microbiol.* **1991**, *13*, 281–286. [CrossRef]

28. Van Heijenoort, J. Lipid Intermediates in the Biosynthesis of Bacterial Peptidoglycan. *Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.* **2007**, *71*, 620–635. [CrossRef]

29. Zacharof, M.P.; Lovitt, R.W. Bacteriocins Produced by Lactic Acid Bacteria a Review Article. *APCBEE Procedia* **2012**, *2*, 50–56. [CrossRef]

30. Nishie, M.; Nagao, J.-I.; Sonomoto, K. Antibacterial Peptides "Bacteriocins": An Overview of Their Diverse Characteristics and Applications. *Biocontrol Sci.* **2012**, *17*, 1–16. [CrossRef]

31. Guinane, C.M.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Spontaneous Resistance in Lactococcus Lactis IL1403 to the Lantibiotic Lacticin 3147. *FEMS Microbiol. Lett.* **2006**, *260*, 77–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

32. Rogers, L.A. Limiting Factors in the Lactic Fermentation. *J. Bacteriol.* **1928**, *16*, 211. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

33. Perez, R.H.; Zendo, T.; Sonomoto, K. Novel Bacteriocins from Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB): Various Structures and Applications. *Microb. Cell Fact.* **2014**, *13*, S3. [CrossRef]

34. Field, D.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. Developing Bacteriocins of Lactic Acid Bacteria into next Generation Biopreservatives. *Curr. Opin. Food Sci.* **2018**, *20*, 1–6. [CrossRef]

35. Pessione, E.; Cirrincione, S. Bioactive Molecules Released in Food by Lactic Acid Bacteria: Encrypted Peptides and Biogenic Amines. *Front. Microbiol.* **2016**, *7*. [CrossRef]

36. Sharma, S.; Singh, R.; Rana, S. Review Article Bioactive Peptides: A Review. *Bioautomation* **2012**, *15*, 223.

37. Clare, D.A.; Swaisgood, H.E. Bioactive Milk Peptides: A Prospectus. *J. Dairy Sci.* **2000**, *83*, 1187–1195. [CrossRef]

38. Vorland, L.H.; Svein, A.; Osbakk, T. Interference of the Antimicrobial Peptide Lactoferricin B with the Action of Various Antibiotics against *Escherichia coli* and *Staphylococcus aureus*. *Scand. J. Infect. Dis.* **1999**, *31*, 173–177. [CrossRef]

39. Bruni, N.; Capucchio, M.T.; Biasibetti, E.; Pessione, E.; Cirrincione, S.; Giraudo, L.; Corona, A.; Dosio, F. Antimicrobial Activity of Lactoferrin-Related Peptides and Applications in Human and Veterinary Medicine. *Molecules* **2016**, *21*, 752. [CrossRef]

40. Brogden, K.A. Antimicrobial Peptides: Pore Formers or Metabolic Inhibitors in Bacteria? *Nat. Rev. Microbiol.* **2005**, *3*, 238–250. [CrossRef]

41. Bradford, M.M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. *Anal. Biochem.* **1976**, *72*, 248–254. [CrossRef]

42. Macwana, S.J.; Muriana, P.M. A "bacteriocin PCR Array" for Identification of Bacteriocin-Related Structural Genes in Lactic Acid Bacteria. *J. Microbiol. Methods* **2012**, *88*, 197–204. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

43. Schägger, H. Tricine–SDS-PAGE. *Nat. Protoc.* **2006**, *1*, 16–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

44. Candiano, G.; Bruschi, M.; Musante, L.; Santucci, L.; Ghiggeri, G.M.; Carnemolla, B.; Orecchia, P.; Zardi, L.; Righetti, P.G. Blue Silver: A Very Sensitive Colloidal Coomassie G-250 Staining for Proteome Analysis. *Electrophoresis* **2004**, *25*, 1327–1333. [CrossRef]

45. Waśko, A.; Kieliszek, M.; Targoński, Z. Purification and characterization of a proteinase from the probiotic *Lactobacillus rhamnosus* OXY. *Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol.* **2012**, *42*, 476–488. [CrossRef]

46. Cocaign-Bousquet, M.; Garrigues, C.; Novak, L.; Lindley, N.D.; Loublere, P. Rational Development of a Simple Synthetic Medium for the Sustained Growth of *Lactococcus Lactis*. *J. Appl. Bacteriol.* **1995**, *79*, 108–116. [CrossRef]

47. Deglaire, A.; Oliveira, S.D.; Jardin, J.; Briard-Bion, V.; Kroell, F.; Emily, M.; Ménard, O.; Bourlieu, C.; Dupont, D. Impact of Human Milk Pasteurization on the Kinetics of Peptide Release during in Vitro Dynamic Digestion at the Preterm Newborn Stage. *Food Chem.* **2019**, *281*, 294–303. [CrossRef]

48. Nebbia, S.; Giribaldi, M.; Cavallarin, L.; Bertino, E.; Coscia, A.; Briard-Bion, V.; Ossemond, J.; Henry, G.; Ménard, O.; Dupont, D.; et al. Differential Impact of Holder and High Temperature Short Time Pasteurization on the Dynamic in Vitro Digestion of Human Milk in a Preterm Newborn Model. *Food Chem.* **2020**, *328*, 127126. [CrossRef]

49. Zava, S.; Barello, C.; Pessione, A.; Garoffo, L.P.; Fattori, P.; Montorfano, G.; Conti, A.; Giunta, C.; Pessione, E.; Berra, B.; et al. Mare's Colostrum Globules Stimulate Fibroblast Growth In Vitro: A Biochemical Study. *J. Med. Food* **2009**, *12*, 836–845. [CrossRef]

50. Nielsen, S.D.; Beverly, R.L.; Qu, Y.; Dallas, D.C. Milk Bioactive Peptide Database: A Comprehensive Database of Milk Protein-Derived Bioactive Peptides and Novel Visualization. *Food Chem.* **2017**, *232*, 673–682. [CrossRef]

51. Asurmendi, P.; García, M.J.; Pascual, L.; Barberis, L. Biocontrol of Listeria Monocytogenes by Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Brewer's Grains Used as Feedstuff in Argentina. *J. Stored Prod. Res.* **2015**, *61*, 27–31. [CrossRef]

52. Orihuel, A.; Bonacina, J.; Vildoza, M.J.; Bru, E.; Vignolo, G.; Saavedra, L.; Fadda, S. Biocontrol of Listeria Monocytogenes in a Meat Model Using a Combination of a Bacteriocinogenic Strain with Curing Additives. *Food Res. Int.* **2018**, *107*, 289–296. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

53. Castellano, P.; Pérez Ibarreche, M.; Blanco Massani, M.; Fontana, C.; Vignolo, G. Strategies for Pathogen Biocontrol Using Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Metabolites: A Focus on Meat Ecosystems and Industrial Environments. *Microorganisms* **2017**, *5*, 38. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

54. Lado, B.H.; Yousef, A.E. 6 Characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes Important to Food Processors. In *Listeria, Listeriosis, and Food Safety*, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 157–215.
55. Mulders, J.W.M.; Boerrigter, I.J.; Rollema, H.S.; Siezen, R.J.; Vos, W.M. Identification and Characterization of the Lantibiotic Nisin Z, a Natural Nisin Variant. *Eur. J. Biochem.* **1991**, *201*, 581–584. [CrossRef]

56. Rollema, H.S.; Kuipers, O.P.; Both, P.; de Vos, W.M.; Siezen, R.J. Improvement of Solubility and Stability of the Antimicrobial Peptide Nisin by Protein Engineering. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **1995**, *61*, 2873–2878. [CrossRef]

57. Kim, M.-H.; Kong, Y.-J.; Baek, H.; Hyun, H.-H. Optimization of Culture Conditions and Medium Composition for the Production of Micrococcin GO5 by *Micrococcus* Sp. GO5. *J. Biotechnol.* **2006**, *121*, 54–61. [CrossRef]

58. Suganthi, V.; Mohanasrinivasan, V. Optimization Studies for Enhanced Bacteriocin Production by Pediococcus Pentosaceus KC692718 Using Response Surface Methodology. *J Food Sci. Technol.* **2015**, *52*, 3773–3783. [CrossRef]

59. Tanaka, Y.; Kimata, K.; Inada, T.; Tagami, H.; Aiba, H. Negative Regulation of the Pts Operon by Mlc: Mechanism Underlying Glucose Induction in *Escherichia coli*. *Genes Cells* **1999**, *4*, 391–399. [CrossRef]

60. Kuipers, O.P.; Beerthuyzen, M.M.; de Ruyter, P.G.G.A.; Luesink, E.J.; de Vos, W.M. Autoregulation of Nisin Biosynthesis in *Lactococcus lactis* by Signal Transduction. *J. Biol. Chem.* **1995**, *270*, 27299–27304. [CrossRef]

61. Kanmani, P.; Kumar, R.S.; Yuvaraj, N.; Paari, K.A.; Pattukumar, V.; Arul, V. Design and Optimization of Fermentation Medium for Enhanced Bacteriocin Production by Probiotic Bacterium Enterococcus Faecium MC13. *Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol.* **2011**, *41*, 40–52. [CrossRef]

62. Turgis, M.; Vu, K.D.; Millette, M.; Dupont, C.; Lacroix, M. Influence of Environmental Factors on Bacteriocin Production by Human Isolates of Lactococcus Lactis MM19 and Pediococcus Acidilactici MM33. *Probiotics Antimicrob. Prot.* **2016**, *8*, 53–59. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

63. Jung, D.-S.; Bodyfelt, F.W.; Daeschel, M.A. Influence of Fat and Emulsifiers on the Efficacy of Nisin in Inhibiting Listeria Monocytogenes in Fluid Milk. *J. Dairy Sci.* **1992**, *75*, 387–393. [CrossRef]

64. Han, J.H. Antimicrobial packaging systems. In *Innovations in Food Packaging*; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 80–107. ISBN 978-0-12-311632-1.

65. Kruijf, N.D.; Beest, M.V.; Rijk, R.; Sipiläinen-Malm, T.; Losada, P.P.; Meulenaer, B.D. Active and Intelligent Packaging: Applications and Regulatory Aspects. *Food Addit. Contam.* **2002**, *19*, 144–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

66. Quintavalla, S.; Vicini, L. Antimicrobial Food Packaging in Meat Industry. *Meat Sci.* **2002**, *62*, 373–380. [CrossRef]

67. Lee, C.H.; Park, H.J.; Lee, D.S. Influence of Antimicrobial Packaging on Kinetics of Spoilage Microbial Growth in Milk and Orange Juice. *J. Food Eng.* **2004**, *65*, 527–531. [CrossRef]

68. Siragusa, G.R.; Cutter, C.N.; Willett, J.L. Incorporation of Bacteriocin in Plastic Retains Activity and Inhibits Surface Growth of Bacteria on Meat. *Food Microbiol.* **1999**, *16*, 229–235. [CrossRef]

69. Cutter, C.N. Microbial Control by Packaging: A Review. *Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.* **2002**, *42*, 151–161. [CrossRef]

70. Gálvez, A.; Abriouel, H.; López, R.L.; Omar, N.B. Bacteriocin-Based Strategies for Food Biopreservation. *Int. J. Food Microbiol.* **2007**, *120*, 51–70. [CrossRef]

71. Guerra, N.P.; Macias, C.L.; Agrasar, A.T.; Castro, L.P. Development of a Bioactive Packaging Cellophane Using NisaplinR as Biopreservative Agent. *Lett. Appl. Microbiol.* **2005**, *40*, 106–110. [CrossRef]

72. Mauriello, G.; De Luca, E.; La Storia, A.; Villani, F.; Ercolini, D. Antimicrobial Activity of a Nisin-Activated Plastic Film for Food Packaging. *Lett. Appl. Microbiol.* **2005**, *41*, 464–469. [CrossRef]

73. Holo, H.; Nilssen, O.; Nes, I.F. Lactococcin A, a New Bacteriocin from Lactococcus Lactis Subsp. Cremoris: Isolation and Characterization of the Protein and Its Gene. *J. Bacteriol.* **1991**, *173*, 3879–3887. [CrossRef]

74. Powell, I.B.; Ward, A.C.; Hillier, A.J.; Davidson, B.E. Simultaneous Conjugal Transfer in *Lactococcus* to Genes Involved in Bacteriocin Production and Reduced Susceptibility to Bacteriophages. *FEMS Microbiol. Lett.* **1990**, *72*, 209–213. [CrossRef]

75. Schillinger, U.; Lücke, F.K. Antibacterial Activity of Lactobacillus Sake Isolated from Meat. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **1989**, *55*, 1901–1906. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

76. Samelis, J.; Roller, S.; Metaxopoulos, J. Sakacin B, a Bacteriocin Produced by Lactobacillus Sake Isolated from Greek Dry Fermented Sausages. *J. Appl. Bacteriol.* **1994**, *76*, 475–486. [CrossRef]

77. Leroy, F.; de Vuyst, L. Temperature and PH Conditions That Prevail during Fermentation of Sausages Are Optimal for Production of the Antilisterial Bacteriocin Sakacin K. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **1999**, *65*, 974–981. [CrossRef]

78. Simon, L.; Fremaux, C.; Cenatiempo, Y.; Berjeaud, J.M. Sakacin G, a New Type of Antilisterial Bacteriocin. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **2002**, *68*, 6416–6420. [CrossRef]

79. Vaughan, A.; Eijsink, V.G.H.; van Sinderen, D. Functional Characterization of a Composite Bacteriocin Locus from Malt Isolate Lactobacillus Sakei5. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **2003**, *69*, 7194–7203. [CrossRef]

80. Katla, T.; Moretro, T.; Sveen, I.; Aasen, I.M.; Axelsson, L.; Rorvik, L.M.; Naterstad, K. Inhibition of Listeria Monocytogenes in Chicken Cold Cuts by Addition of Sakacin P and Sakacin P-Producing Lactobacillus Sakei. *J. Appl. Microbiol.* **2002**, *93*, 191–196. [CrossRef]

81. Jiang, J.; Shi, B.; Zhu, D.; Cai, Q.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Qi, K.; Zhang, M. Characterization of a Novel Bacteriocin Produced by Lactobacillus Sakei LSJ618 Isolated from Traditional Chinese Fermented Radish. *Food Control* **2012**, *23*, 338–344. [CrossRef]

82. Gao, Y.; Li, D.; Liu, X. Bacteriocin-Producing Lactobacillus Sakei C2 as Starter Culture in Fermented Sausages. *Food Control* **2014**, *35*, 1–6. [CrossRef]

83. Kazazic, M.; Nissen-Meyer, J.; Fimland, G. Mutational Analysis of the Role of Charged Residues in Target-Cell Binding, Potency and Specificity of the Pediocin-like Bacteriocin Sakacin P. *Microbiology* **2002**, *148*, 2019–2027. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
84. Kunji, E.R.S.; Mierau, I.; Hagting, A.; Poolman, B.; Konings, W.N. The Proteolytic Systems of Lactic Acid Bacteria. *Antonie Leeuwen-hoek* **1996**, *70*, 187–221. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

85. Sadat-Mekmene, L.; Genay, M.; Atlan, D.; Lortal, S.; Gagnaire, V. Original Features of Cell-Envelope Proteinases of Lactobacillus Helveticus. A Review. *Int. J. Food Microbiol.* **2011**, *146*, 1–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

86. Martínez-Maqueda, D.; Miralles, B.; De Pascual-Teresa, S.; Reverón, I.; Muñoz, R.; Recio, I. Food-Derived Peptides Stimulate Mucin Secretion and Gene Expression in Intestinal Cells. *J. Agric. Food Chem.* **2012**, *60*, 8600–8605. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

87. Liu, Y.; Eichler, J.; Pischetsrieder, M. Virtual Screening of a Milk Peptide Database for the Identification of Food-Derived Antimicrobial Peptides. *Mol. Nutr. Food Res.* **2015**, *59*, 2243–2254. [CrossRef]

88. Maeno, M.; Yamamoto, N.; Takano, T. Identification of an Antihypertensive Peptide from Casein Hydrolysate Produced by a Proteinase from Lactobacillus Helveticus CP790. *J. Dairy Sci.* **1996**, *79*, 1316–1321. [CrossRef]

89. Saito, T.; Nakamura, T.; Kitazawa, H.; Kawai, Y.; Itoh, T. Isolation and Structural Analysis of Antihypertensive Peptides That Exist Naturally in Gouda Cheese. *J. Dairy Sci.* **2000**, *83*, 1434–1440. [CrossRef]

90. Sistla, S. Structure–Activity Relationships of As-Casein Peptides with Multifunctional Biological Activities. *Mol. Cell Biochem.* **2013**, *384*, 29–38. [CrossRef]

91. Robert, M.-C.; Razaname, A.; Mutter, M.; Juillerat, M.A. Identification of Angiotensin-I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptides Derived from Sodium Caseinate Hydrolysates Produced by *Lactobacillus Helveticus* NCC 2765. *J. Agric. Food Chem.* **2004**, *52*, 6923–6931. [CrossRef]

92. Almaas, H.; Eriksen, E.; Sekse, C.; Comi, I.; Flengsrud, R.; Holm, H.; Jensen, E.; Jacobsen, M.; Langsrud, T.; Vegarud, G.E. Antibacterial Peptides Derived from Caprine Whey Proteins, by Digestion with Human Gastrointestinal Juice. *Br. J. Nutr.* **2011**, *106*, 896–905. [CrossRef]

93. Lu, Y.; Govindasamy-Lucey, S.; Lucey, J.A. Angiotensin-I-Converting Enzyme-Inhibitory Peptides in Commercial Wisconsin Cheddar Cheeses of Different Ages. *J. Dairy Sci.* **2016**, *99*, 41–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

94. Hayes, M.; Stanton, C.; Slattery, H.; O'Sullivan, O.; Hill, C.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Ross, R.P. Casein Fermentate of Lactobacillus Animalis DPC6134 Contains a Range of Novel Peptide Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **2007**, *73*, 4658–4667. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

95. Birkemo, G.A.; O'Sullivan, O.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. Antimicrobial Activity of Two Peptides Caseicin 15 and 17, Found Naturally in Bovine Colostrum. *J. Appl. Microbiol.* **2009**, *106*, 233–240. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

96. Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E.; Márquez-Hernández, R.I.; Hernández-Castellano, L.E. Bioactive Peptides from Milk: Animal Determinants and Their Implications in Human Health. *J. Dairy Res.* **2019**, *86*, 136–144. [CrossRef]

97. Loukas, S.; Varoucha, D.; Zioudrou, C.; Streaty, R.A.; Klee, W.A. Opioid Activities and Structures of Alpha.-Casein-Derived Exorphins. *Biochemistry* **1983**, *22*, 4567–4573. [CrossRef]