# Canine leishmaniosis in Tunisia: Growing prevalence, larger zones of infection

Ali Bouattour, Amine Amri, Jaber Amine Belkhiria, Adel Rhim, Ons Fezaa, Jean-Charles Gantier, Youmna M’Ghirbi

► To cite this version:

Ali Bouattour, Amine Amri, Jaber Amine Belkhiria, Adel Rhim, Ons Fezaa, et al.. Canine leishman-
iosis in Tunisia: Growing prevalence, larger zones of infection. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases,
2021, 15 (12), pp.e0009990. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009990. pasteur-03559666

HAL Id: pasteur-03559666

https://riip.hal.science/pasteur-03559666

Submitted on 7 Feb 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
RESEARCH ARTICLE

# Canine leishmaniosis in Tunisia: Growing prevalence, larger zones of infection

Ali Bouattour<sup>1*</sup>, Amine Amri<sup>1</sup>, Jaber Amine Belkhiria<sup>2</sup>, Adel Rhim<sup>1</sup>, Ons Fezaa<sup>1</sup>, Jean-Charles Gantier<sup>3</sup>, Youmna M'ghirbi<sup>1</sup>

1 Laboratoire de Virus, Vecteurs et Hôtes: LR20IPT02, Institut Pasteur de Tunis, Université Tunis El Manar, Tunis-Belvédère, Tunisia, 2 One Health Institute, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America, 3 Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Faculté de Pharmacie, France

* ali.bouattour@pasteur.tn

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

## Abstract

### Background

Discovered by Nicolle and Comte in 1908 in Tunisia, *Leishmania infantum* is an intracellular protozoan responsible for zoonotic canine leishmaniosis (CanL) and zoonotic human visceral leishmaniasis (HVL). It is endemic in several regions of the world, including Tunisia, with dogs considered as the main domestic reservoir. The geographic expansion of canine leishmaniosis (CanL) has been linked to global environmental changes that have affected the density and the distribution of its sand fly vectors.

### Methodology/Principal findings

In this study, a cross-sectional epidemiological survey on CanL was carried out in 8 localities in 8 bioclimatic areas of Tunisia. Blood samples were taken from 317 dogs after clinical examination. Collected sera were tested by indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT; 1:80) for the presence of anti-*Leishmania infantum* antibodies. The overall seroprevalence was 58.3% (185/317). Among positive dogs, only 16.7% showed clinical signs suggestive of leishmaniosis. Seroprevalence rates varied from 6.8% to 84.6% and from 28% to 66% by bioclimatic zone and age group, respectively. Serological positivity was not statistically associated with gender. The presence of *Leishmania* DNA in blood, using PCR, revealed 21.2% (64/302) prevalence in dogs, which varied by bioclimatic zone (7.3% to 31%) and age group (7% to 25%). The entomological survey carried out in the studied localities showed 16 species of the two genera (*Phlebotomus* and *Sergentomyia*). *P. perniciosus*, *P. papatasi*, and *P. perfiliewi* were the most dominant species with relative abundances of 34.7%, 25% and 20.4%, respectively.

### Conclusions/Significance

The present report suggests a significant increase of CanL in all bioclimatic areas in Tunisia and confirms the ongoing spread of the infection of dogs to the country's arid zone. Such an expansion of infection in dog population could be attributed to ecological, agronomic, social and climatic factors that affect the presence and density of the phlebotomine vectors.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

OPEN ACCESS

**Citation:** Bouattour A, Amri A, Belkhiria JA, Rhim A, Fezaa O, Gantier J-C, et al. (2021) Canine leishmaniosis in Tunisia: Growing prevalence, larger zones of infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 15(12): e0009990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009990

**Editor:** Christine A. Petersen, University of Iowa, UNITED STATES

**Received:** June 28, 2021

**Accepted:** November 10, 2021

**Published:** December 10, 2021

**Copyright:** © 2021 Bouattour et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Data Availability Statement:** All relevant data are within the manuscript.

**Funding:** The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

**Competing interests:** The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
## Author summary

Visceral leishmaniasis caused by *Leishmania infantum* is an endemic disease in several regions of the world, especially, in the Mediterranean basin, where dogs constitute the main domestic reservoir for humans. This zoonotic vector-borne disease is closely associated with the environment.

We carried out studies in 8 different regions of Tunisia, collecting and testing blood samples from 317 dogs. Out of which, more than half (58.3%) tested positive for *L. infantum* (IFAT+), although, only one-third of these displayed clinical signs. However, the detection of *Leishmania* DNA by blood PCR revealed a global prevalence in dogs of 21.2% (64/302) with a variation between bioclimatic zones. Our entomological survey revealed 16 sand fly species, dominated by the *Phlebotomus* and *Sergentomyia* genera, of which the most dominant were *P. perniciosus*, *P. perfiliewi* and *P. papatasi*. The first two of these are recognized vectors of *L. infantum*. Canine leishmaniosis continues to spread across Tunisia, moving southward, to arid zones because of global warming and agronomic and social factors affecting the presence and density of the phlebotomine vectors.

## Introduction

Global environmental changes (e.g. global warming, deforestation, land use) and the effects of such changes on wildlife species and insect fauna are potentially affecting vector-borne diseases such as leishmaniasis [1–5]. Discovered by Nicolle and Comte in 1908 in Tunisia, *Leishmania infantum* is an intracellular protozoan that causes canine leishmaniosis (CanL) and Human visceral leishmaniasis (HVL). It has become endemic in the Mediterranean basin, the Middle East, South America, and Asia [6]. Its geographical expansion has been proposed to be linked to global environmental changes affecting the distribution of both the pathogen’s sand fly “vectors” (order Diptera, family Psychodidae, subfamily Phlebotominae) and also of the reservoirs of *L. infantum* composed from a wide range of mammal species, especially domestic and stray dogs (*Canis familiaris*) [7].

An estimated 50000 to 90000 new visceral leishmaniasis cases occur worldwide annually. Most cases occur in Brazil, East Africa and in India with primary signs that include irregular bouts of fever, weight loss, anemia and hepato-splenomegaly [6].

In Tunisia, human visceral leishmaniasis (HVL) is caused by the same *Leishmania* species zymodeme MON-1 (set of strains with the same enzymatic profile) [8–10]. The parasite is transmitted to mammalian hosts through bites of infected phlebotomine sandflies of the genus *Phlebotomus*, such as *P. perniciosus* and *P. perfiliewi* [11,12]. During the last decades, the mean annual average of HVL was 99.6 cases/year, with a mean annual incidence of 1.04 cases/ 100,000 inhabitants [9], indicating an important increase with respect to previous studies. Indeed, the mean incidence rate rose from 12.8 cases in the 1960s and 1970s to 56.8 cases in the 1980s. As of the 1990s, it reached epidemic levels of approximately 100 cases [9,13–15].

A spatial correlation was confirmed between the occurrence of HVL and the high rate of *Leishmania* infection in Tunisian dogs, which are the main reservoir host of *L. infantum* [10,14,16]. In addition, previous serological surveys carried out in several regions of Tunisia also confirmed the endemic and progressive nature of CanL and showed that it is expanding to new parts of the country previously presumed to be free of the disease–the central and southern regions [10,14,17–19].

Several factors, including environmental and climatic changes affecting the presence and density of the phlebotomine sand fly vectors, are suspected causes of the epidemiological
changes of leishmaniasis in North Africa, particularly in Tunisia [5]. The surveillance of the expansion of canine leishmaniosis and its vector sandflies is essential to understand the epidemiology of the disease and to develop a health control program in Tunisia for both humans and dogs.

The primary objective of the present work is to study the prevalence of canine leishmaniosis by bioclimatic region using serological and molecular techniques to detect *L. infantum* infection in dogs. We also aimed to collect sand fly fauna in the sampled dog's surroundings, to identify the role of these insects in the spread of CanL and contribute to developing a disease control strategy.

# Methods

## Ethics statement

This study was approved by the ethical review committee of the Institute Pasteur of Tunis. Dogs were examined and sampled by veterinary clinicians following procedures of this committee and after obtaining the owner's consent. Owners presented their dogs for rabies vaccination.

## Study area and data collection

A cross-sectional study was carried out in 8 localities, representing 8 bioclimatic zones in Tunisia (Table 1 and Fig 1). Mixed-breed dogs were randomly sampled during rabies

<table><caption>Table 1. Prevalence rates of *L.infantum* in dogs determined by IFAT (1:80) and PCR according to the locality.</caption><thead><tr><th>Studied locality (Governorate)</th><th>Geographic Coordinates</th><th>Bioclimatic zones (annual rainfall)</th><th>Agricultural landscape and natural vegetation</th><th>IFAT positive dogs/ tested dogs seroprevalence % [95%CI]</th><th>PCR positive/tested dogs prevalence % [95%CI]</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Zaga (Béja)</td><td>36°55'20.41"N 8°59'30.6"E</td><td>Humid (950 mm).</td><td>Rural. Mountainous site with oaks, river whose water used to irrigate vegetable crops and tobacco. Cattle breeding</td><td>33/46<br>71.7<br>[58.7-84.7]</td><td>6/44<br>13.6<br>[3.5-23.7]</td></tr><tr><td>Utique (Bizerte)</td><td>37° 6'36.68"N 10° 1'18.74"E</td><td>Sub-humid (600 mm)</td><td>Rural. Hilly, grain cultivation, cattle breeding</td><td>18/31<br>58<br>[40.7-75.4]</td><td>8/31<br>25.8<br>[10.4-41.2]</td></tr><tr><td>Tunis</td><td>36°51'52.1"N 10°10'53.2"E</td><td>Higher semi-arid (450 mm)</td><td>Peri-urban. Small home gardens</td><td>14/32<br>43.7<br>[26.5-60.9]</td><td>9/29<br>31<br>[14.2-47.8]</td></tr><tr><td>Sômaa (Nabeul)</td><td>36°32'31.7"N 10°46'50.6"E</td><td>Middle Semi-arid (costal) (450 mm)</td><td>Rural. Agricultural, primarily citrus trees and market gardening. Very few cattle</td><td>26/33<br>78.8<br>[64.8-92.7]</td><td>9/32<br>28.1<br>[12.5-43.7]</td></tr><tr><td>Beni Darraj (Zaghouan)</td><td>36°24'6.53"N 10°15'40.02"E</td><td>Middle Semi-arid (continental) (400 mm)</td><td>Rural. Flatlands, grain production. Cattle and sheep breeding</td><td>22/29<br>75.8<br>[60.3-91.4]</td><td>7/27<br>26<br>[9.4-42.4]</td></tr><tr><td>Moknine (Monastir)</td><td>35°36'13.84"N 10°53'27.40"E</td><td>Lower semi-arid (250 mm)</td><td>Rural. Coastal, relatively low, olives trees. Poultry</td><td>25/50<br>50<br>[36.1-63.8]</td><td>10/48<br>20.8<br>[9.3-32.3]</td></tr><tr><td>Zaafrana (Kairouan)</td><td>35°32'41.74"N 10° 4'27.35"E</td><td>Higher arid (250 mm)</td><td>Rural. Plains, olive, and other fruit trees. Sheep and poultry farming</td><td>44/52<br>84.6<br>[74.8-94.4]</td><td>12/50<br>24<br>[12.16-35.8]</td></tr><tr><td>Thyna (Sfax)</td><td>34°39'29.95"N 10°40'7.18"E</td><td>Middle arid (200 mm)</td><td>Rural. Lowland, olive trees. Poultry farming</td><td>3/44<br>6.8<br>[0-14.3]</td><td>3/41<br>7.3<br>[0-15.3]</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>185/317<br>58.3<br>[52.9-63.8]</td><td>64/302<br>21.2<br>[16.6-25.8]</td></tr></tbody></table>
vaccination campaigns organized by regional veterinary services between June and August 2016. Informed consent was obtained from each owner. Stray dogs were not included in our study as they were difficult to catch. All dogs were subjected to a rapid physical examination for compatible clinical signs with CanL, including skin lesions, exfoliative dermatitis, erosive-ulcerative lesions, lymphadenomegaly, weight loss, and onychogryphosis [20].

A sample of peripheral blood (5 mL) was taken from each dog's radial vein. Whole blood was collected in tubes with no additives for an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and also in tubes with Ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid (EDTA)-anticoagulant for DNA extraction and PCR analysis. Data for each dog included age (3-8 months, 9-18 months, 18-36 months, more than 36 months), gender, and the sampling site's bioclimatic zone (Fig 1 and Table 1). According to the owners, no insecticide or other treatment has been used against sandflies.

## Detection of *Leishmania infantum*

**Serological survey.** The seroprevalence of *L. infantum* was investigated using a commercially available IFAT. The *Leishmania*-spot IF test (BioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) was carried out as per the manufacturer's recommendations. Sera were screened at a single dilution of 1:80 in Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and considered positive for anti-*Leishmania* antibodies when two readers observed fluorescence at this dilution. Dog sera and controls (positive and negative) were diluted to 1:80 in PBS. Aliquots of 10 µL were spotted on each circle and slides were incubated for 10 min at 37°C with 95% humidity. Fluorescent staining was performed using a fluorescein-labeled anti-dog gamma globulin (BioMakor, France) diluted at 1:100 and colored with 0.002% Evans blue-PBS solution.

## Molecular survey

**DNA extraction.** DNA was extracted from 200 mL of whole blood from each dog using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany), as per the manufacturer's instructions. DNA was eluted on 100 µL and extracts were stored at -20°C until use. Distilled water was included as a negative control for every 10 samples to test for possible contamination. DNA concentration was examined with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE).

**PCR amplification.** A set of primers RV1 and RV2 was used to amplify the 145 bp of the conserved region of *L. infantum* kinetoplast DNA [21]. These primers are specific to *L. infantum*, which belongs to the *L. donovani* sensu lato complex. Using a commercially available PCR assay kit, PCR reactions were performed in 25 µL final volume reactions that included 0.5 µM of each primer, 200 µM (each dNTP) (Takara, Japan), 0.75 U Taq DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa Ex Taq, Hilden, Germany), 1× Taq buffer and 4 µL extracted genomic DNA. Amplification was carried out in a thermocycler (Applied Biosystems 2720, Germany) as follows: initial annealing at 94°C for 4 min, 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 59°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, a final elongation at 72°C for 10 min. To avoid cross-contamination and false-positive reactions, PCRs were performed in a separate room, used plugged tips, and included a negative (water) and a positive control in each run. PCR products were visualized by SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen, France), staining after electrophoresis in a 1.5% Agarose gel.

**Entomological survey.** Phlebotomine sand fly sampling was performed in June and July 2016, the main phlebotomine sand fly season [12]. Sandflies were collected using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention miniature light traps (CDC-LT) (John W. Hock Co., Gainesville, FL, U.S.A). In each sampling site, four CDC-LT were suspended proximate to the dog's habitat and operated for 2 nights between 6:00 pm and 08:00 am. CDC-LT were then transferred to the laboratory and kept in the freezer for 15 min to immobilize collected
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
**Fig 1. Map of Tunisia showing the studied localities according to bioclimatic zones.** The base layers of the map is on this link: https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/content/carte-bioclimatique-de-la-tunisie-selon-la-classification-demberger-etages-et-variantes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009990.g001

phlebotomine sandflies. Specimens were examined under a binocular dissecting microscope and identified at the species level according to the morphological characteristics described by Croset et al., [22] and Ghrab et al., [23]. The relative abundance of each species was estimated as the percentage of samples collected per species from the total number of species collected.

**Statistical analysis.** Statistical analysis was carried out with R software [24]. Descriptive methods were used to characterize dogs sampled and the diagnostic test results (IFAT and PCR). Proportions were presented for categorical variables and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Chi-square was used to test the associations between possible risk factors and both the presence of the parasite (PCR) and antibodies against *L. infantum* (IFAT). When the sample size was small, Fisher's exact test was used instead. The differences were considered sta- tistically significant with a p-value was ≤0.05. Odds ratios (OR) and the 95% CI were estimated by binary logistic regression. The degree of agreements between IFAT, PCR results, and pres- ence of symptoms were determined by calculating the Kappa (k) values with 95% CI. Kappa was considered statistically significant with a p-value ≤ 0.05.

## Results

A total of 317 dogs were sampled. The sex ratio was 2:1 (214 males: 103 females). The average age of the dogs was 2.8 years (ranging from 5 months to 16 years). Of the dogs that were exam- ined, 41 (12.9%) presented at least two clinical signs compatible with leishmaniosis.

### IFAT test

Among 317 tested dogs by IFAT (single dilution 1:80), 185 (58.3%) presented IgG anti-*L. infantum* (Table 2). Only 31 (16.7%) of the seropositive dogs presented clinical signs suggestive of CanL. Seroprevalence rates varied from 6.8% to 84.6% according to bioclimatic zone and between 28% and 66% according to age group (Table 1). Both age and bioclimatic zones were significantly associated with the presence of antibodies against *L. infantum* (p<0.05). In female dogs, the seroprevalence rate (61%; 63/103) was higher than in males (57%; 122/214), but this difference was not statistically different (p>0.05) (Table 2).

### PCR test

A total of 302 dogs were tested by PCR, which yielded 64 positives (21.2%) out of which 12 pre- sented CanL clinical signs (10 weight loss; 5 lymphadenomegaly). In 15 dogs, the blood sample was insufficient to be tested by PCR. The PCR *Leishmania* prevalence varied with age group from 7% to 25%; and among bioclimatic zones (7.3% to 31%) (Table 2). Neither age nor biocli- matic zone were significantly associated with a *Leishmania* infection rate detected by PCR (p>0.05) (Table 2).

### IFAT vs PCR and presence of clinical signs

Only 46 samples (15.2%) were positive by PCR an IFAT, among them only 10 dogs showed CanL sings. Of 136 (45%) dogs positive only by IFAT, 19 showed symptoms (Table 3). The cal- culated Kappa value with a 95% confidence interval was k = 0.09 (0.07, 0.17) for serology and PCR, indicating a low agreement between the results of these methods. Similarly, low
<table><caption>Table 2. Descriptive of CanL prevalence.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Risk Factors</th><th colspan="3">IFAT</th><th colspan="3">PCR</th></tr><tr><th>Nb positives /Nb tested dogs</th><th>Prevalence [95% CI]</th><th>OR [95%CI]</th><th>Nb positives/ Nb tested dogs</th><th>Prevalence [95% CI]</th><th>OR [95%CI]</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sex</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Female</td><td>63/103</td><td>0.61 [0.52-0.70]</td><td>Reference</td><td>23/98</td><td>0.20 [0.14-0.25]</td><td>Reference</td></tr><tr><td>Male</td><td>122/214</td><td>0.57 [0.5-0.64]</td><td>1.188 [0.735-1.919]</td><td>41/204</td><td>0.23 [0.15-0.32]</td><td>0.688 [0.372-1.274]</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Age</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3-8 months</td><td>7/25</td><td>0.28 [0.10-0.45]</td><td>Reference</td><td>1/13</td><td>0.7 [0-0.23]</td><td>Reference</td></tr><tr><td>9-18 months</td><td>24/50</td><td>0.48 [0.34-0.61]</td><td>0.223 [0.087-0.572]</td><td>10/42</td><td>0.23 [0.10-0.36]</td><td>0.193 [0.025-1.487]</td></tr><tr><td>&gt;18-36 months</td><td>42/74</td><td>0.56 [0.45-0.68]</td><td>0.470 [0.248-0.891]</td><td>19/74</td><td>0.25 [0.15-0.35]</td><td>1.168 [0.524-2.603]</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 36 months</td><td>112/168</td><td>0.66 [0.59-0.73]</td><td>0.648 [0.371-1.130]</td><td>35/173</td><td>0.20 [0.14-0.26]</td><td>1.356 [0.711-2.583]</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Bioclimatic zones</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Sub-humid</td><td>18/31</td><td>0.58 [0.40-0.75]</td><td>Reference</td><td>8/31</td><td>0.25 [0.10-0.4]</td><td>Reference</td></tr><tr><td>Humid</td><td>33/46</td><td>0.71 [0.58-0.84]</td><td>1.833 [0.702-4.786]</td><td>6/44</td><td>0.13 [0.35-0.23]</td><td>0.454 [0.140-1.475]</td></tr><tr><td>Higher semi-arid</td><td>14/32</td><td>0.43 [0.26-0.60]</td><td>0.562 [0.207-1.524]</td><td>9/29</td><td>0.31 [0.14-0.47]</td><td>1.294 [0.420-3.986]</td></tr><tr><td>Middle Semi-arid (costal)</td><td>26/33</td><td>0.78 [0.64-0.92]</td><td>2.683 [0.895-8.042]</td><td>9/32</td><td>0.28 [0.12-0.43]</td><td>1.125 [0.369-3.427]</td></tr><tr><td>Middle Semi-arid (continental)</td><td>22/29</td><td>0.75 [0.60-0.91]</td><td>2.270 [0.748-6.888]</td><td>7/27</td><td>0.26 [0.94-0.42]</td><td>1.006 [0.310-3.269]</td></tr><tr><td>Lower semi-arid</td><td>25/50</td><td>0.50 [0.36-0.63]</td><td>0.722 [0.293-1.783]</td><td>10/48</td><td>0.20 [0.93-0.32]</td><td>0.757 [0.261-2.193]</td></tr><tr><td>Higher arid</td><td>44/52</td><td>0.84 [74.8-0.94]</td><td>3.972 [1.408-11.210]</td><td>12/50</td><td>0.24 [0.12-0.35]</td><td>0.908 [0.323-2.552]</td></tr><tr><td>Middle arid</td><td>3/44</td><td>0.60 [0-0.14]</td><td>0.053 [0.013-0.208]</td><td>3/41</td><td>0.73 [0-0.15]</td><td>0.227 [0.055-0.943]</td></tr></tbody></table>

Nb: Number; OR: Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009990.t002

agreement was also observed for both tests and presence of symptoms k = 0.03 (0.09, 0.16) for serology and k was non-significant for PCR (p>0.05) (Tables 3 and 4).

## Entomological survey

A total of 3,210 phlebotomine sandflies were captured. Of these, 2,654 (83%; 1,574 males, 1,080 females for a ratio of 1.46) specimens were identified as belonging to 16 species of two genera—*Phlebotomus* and *Sergentomyia*. *P. perniciosus*, *P. papatasi*, and *P. perfiliewi* were the

<table><caption>Table 3. IFAT vs PCR results and compatible clinical signs of CanL.</caption><thead><tr><th>IFAT</th><th>PCR</th><th>Nb of dogs</th><th>Presence of CanL symptoms</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>+</td><td>+</td><td>46</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>102</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>+</td><td>-</td><td>136</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>-</td><td>+</td><td>18</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td></td><td>302</td><td>35</td></tr></tbody></table>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009990.t003
<table><caption>Table 4. The agreements between IFAT, PCR results and compatible clinical signs of CanL.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>PCR / IFAT</th><th>PCR / CanL Symptoms</th><th>IFAT / CanL Symptoms</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Expected Agreement</td><td>0.44</td><td>0.72</td><td>0.42</td></tr><tr><td>Observed Agreement</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.75</td><td>0.47</td></tr><tr><td>Kappa coefficient</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>95% Confidence interval</td><td>0.007-0.17</td><td>0.003-0.21</td><td>0.003-0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Z (Kappa); P value</td><td>2.13; p <0.05</td><td>2.01; p <0.05</td><td>2.90; p <0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Classification</td><td>Minimal</td><td>Minimal</td><td>Minimal</td></tr></tbody></table>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009990.t004

dominant species with relative abundances of 34.7%, 25% and 20.4% respectively. Most sand-flies were collected in continental medium semi-arid and lower semi-arid areas (Table 5).

Discussion

CanL caused by *L. infantum* is the most important vector-borne disease in dogs in the Mediterranean region which also raises human health concerns [25-28]. The IFAT is considered the serological method of choice for diagnosing CanL [29-31]; it is useful for assaying specific IgG against *L. infantum* in large numbers of dogs. Using IFAT 1:80 in our CanL survey, we found an overall seroprevalence of 58.3% across the 8 localities in 8 different bioclimatic zones (ranging from 6.8% to 84.6%). This overall seroprevalence is higher than those previously reported in Eastern-Central and Central Tunisia 6% and 26.7% respectively [10,17]. Similarly, in the north of Tunisia Diouani et al., [18] showed seroprevalence rates of 18% and 22% in 1994 and 1995 respectively. In neighboring Algeria and Morocco, seroprevalence rates varied by region and by test with Algeria at 36% [28] and Morocco at 18.7%) [32].

This seroprevalence is also in the range of rates in highly endemic regions of several Mediterranean countries such as Spain, Italy, and France, where the mean reported seroprevalence varied between 65% and 98% [25,33]. Seroprevalence in our study, varied significantly among bioclimatic zones ranging from 84.6% to 6.8%. Zoghlami et al., [10] reported an overall CanL

<table><caption>Table 5. Entomological survey by locality.</caption><thead><tr><th>Locality Phlebotomus species</th><th>Zaga</th><th>Utique</th><th>Tunis</th><th>Sòmaa</th><th>Beni Darraj</th><th>Moknine</th><th>Zaafrana</th><th>Thyna</th><th>Total</th><th>Relative abundance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>P. alexandri</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>13</td><td>0</td><td>3</td><td>16</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>P. ariasi</td><td>4</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>4</td><td>0.2</td></tr><tr><td>P. chabaudi</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>12</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>21</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>P. langeroni</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>8</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>8</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>P. longicuspis</td><td>5</td><td>13</td><td>0</td><td>30</td><td>0</td><td>9</td><td>11</td><td>16</td><td>84</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>P. papatasi</td><td>54</td><td>2</td><td>25</td><td>23</td><td>221</td><td>128</td><td>120</td><td>88</td><td>661</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>P. perfiliewi</td><td>85</td><td>149</td><td>96</td><td>28</td><td>117</td><td>37</td><td>20</td><td>11</td><td>543</td><td>20.4</td></tr><tr><td>P. perniciosus</td><td>70</td><td>143</td><td>126</td><td>45</td><td>205</td><td>209</td><td>91</td><td>32</td><td>921</td><td>34.7</td></tr><tr><td>P. riouxi</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>9</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>9</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>P. sergenti</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>12</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>12</td><td>0.4</td></tr><tr><td>S. antennata</td><td>5</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>7</td><td>0</td><td>6</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>19</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>S. christophersi</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td>0</td><td>15</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>S. clydei</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>5</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>5</td><td>0.2</td></tr><tr><td>S. dreyfussi</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>14</td><td>29</td><td>20</td><td>63</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>S. fallax</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>4</td><td>21</td><td>13</td><td>38</td><td>1.4</td></tr><tr><td>S. minuta parroti</td><td>11</td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>115</td><td>58</td><td>23</td><td>6</td><td>235</td><td>8.85</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>234</td><td>308</td><td>265</td><td>136</td><td>658</td><td>531</td><td>326</td><td>196</td><td>2654</td><td>100</td></tr></tbody></table>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009990.t005
seroprevalence of 26.7% with a maximum of 52.7% in central Tunisia. Similar variations in prevalence were recorded in Morocco, Algeria, and Iran [28,32,34,35].

The easily-performed IFAT remains the reference serological method for the detection of antibodies against *Leishmania* in dogs [31]. Like any diagnostic technique, it comes with limitations, such as the significantly lower sensitivity for identifying asymptomatic dogs as compared with tests like ELISA [36,37].

Nevertheless, in endemic areas, IFAT 1:80 positive dogs does not confirm the infection, as it could only indicate exposure to the parasite [38]. To confirm the infected dog, an end-point serial serum dilution should be obtained to determine the level of the antibodies [39]. Indeed, dogs with higher IFAT titer are known to display more clinical signs of leishmaniosis. Many studies have found a positive correlation between anti-*Leishmania* antibodies and clinical manifestations [40,41]. IFAT may also lead to false-positive results [42] from cross reactivity with antibodies against other infectious agents such as *Ehrlichia*, *Babesia*, *Trypanosoma* [43–46]. In addition, cross reactions can be observed with *Leishmania major* and *L. tropica* (*L. kill-icki*) which are endemic in Central and Southern Tunisia [47], and may also infect dogs [48].

To complement the serological test, we used a specific *Leishmania* PCR analysis. Among 302 tested dogs by PCR, only 21% were positive, a prevalence rate lower than that obtained by IFAT but similar to other findings [49]. The low agreement between PCR and IFAT was not surprising. Previous studies have reported conflicting results between PCR and IFAT [50]. In dogs from endemic area in Tunisia, Chargui et al., [51] showed that PCR was more sensitive than IFAT. Indeed, PCR is very sensitive and specific when multicopy DNA sequences are targeted. On another side, there is no consensus among laboratories on the IFAT cut-off titer, which can vary from 1:40 to 1:320; those could explain the variation in seroprevalences [52].

Dogs that are PCR positive but seronegative might have been recently infected, not having detectable antibodies since seroconversion can take several months [53]. Indeed, some dogs can remain antibody-negative indefinitely [26,27]. In fact, seropositive dogs with clinical signs should have a positive PCR, as the parasite load in tissues is higher. So, negative PCR results could be attributed to the DNA extraction protocol, the primers used and the used biological samples [54,55]. Indeed, higher sensitivity values were found for PCR dot blot tests performed on lymph node aspirates than for tests with blood samples [54]. Furthermore, seropositive dogs testing negative by PCR (n = 136) might have a strong, persistent humoral response (IgG) [56,57].

PCR on blood, which is less sensitive when compared to lymph nodes and bone marrow, cannot replace the “Gold Standard test” for a large epidemiological study [44,45]. Less invasive methods such as swab rubbing of the conjunctiva and oral mucosa or snout, did however provide samples with higher parasite loads than blood, and could be used to improve sensitivity of molecular techniques such as PCR, which can be used as complement tests for the diagnosis of Leishmaniosis [37].

Only 16.7% of the seropositive dogs presented clinical signs possibly linked to leishmaniosis. This supports a study in northern Tunisia reporting similar results [18]. It is more likely that naturally selected local dog populations show no symptoms of infection [58], as several studies in CanL-endemic areas have reported that approximately 80% of infected local dogs are asymptomatic [49,59,60] and can remain so for a prolonged period of time [34,61,62]. Such asymptomatic dogs may play an important role in the transmission cycle of visceral leishmaniasis [63] as they can still transmit *Leishmania* to sandflies [63,64].

Seroprevalence did not differ by gender, as previously described in Tunisia [18] and elsewhere [25,61,65,66]. Seropositivity does increase significantly with age; older dogs have a higher risk of exposure to infected phlebotomine sandflies [25,34,61,65]. In puppies (less than 8 months) seropositivity (28%) is higher comparing to the PCR rate (7%). This could be
attributed to the vertical transmission of *Leishmania* parasite as it was previously shown. This transplacental transmission of *Leishmania* may be considered a factor in the increase of sero-prevalence [67–69].

All Phlebotomine identified in this study were previously recorded, which indicate that no new *Phlebotomus* species have been detected in this investigation. The number of night trap samples surveyed, during our investigation, do not allow definitive statement about sand fly fauna. However, they do provide information about sandflies living in proximity of dogs. Phlebotomine vectors were collected in July, the normal season for sand fly activity in Tunisia [22,23]. Previous studies strongly suspected *P. longicuspis*, *P. langeroni* and *P. ariasi* were the main vectors of *L. infantum* in North Africa [11,70,71]. Interestingly, this study caught very few sandflies of these species compared to *P. perniciosus* Newstead, 1911 and *P. perfiliewi* Parrot, 1939 which were found in proximity to dogs at all localities of the study and represented 55% of all captured specimens. This finding matched other studies that considered these two species to be the main vectors of *L. infantum* in the Mediterranean basin [11], especially in North African countries [10,12,71]. Both *P. perniciosus* and *P. perfiliewi* are opportunistic feeders [72,73] and the principal vector of the viscerotropic *L. infantum* zymodeme MON1, the etiologic agent for both CanL and HVL in Tunisia [74,75]. *P. papatasi* was quite abundant (25%) in our Phlebotomine collection. This species, known as the vector of *L. major* and the agent of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the central and southern Tunisia, can bite dogs and transmit *L. major* [48].

This study confirms that CanL is gaining ground in Tunisia. The parasite first found to be endemic in the sub-humid and upper semi-arid zones of northern Tunisia [76–79] has slowly expanded southward [9,10,14,17,80,81]. Our study showed a clear increase in CanL seroprevalence, particularly in the arid zone (49% vs 1.6%) [82]. Boussaa et al., [32] reported a similar south ward geographical expansion in Morocco where a CanL seroprevalence of 82% was found in southern regions that had been considered disease-free merely a few years ago.

Changes in agricultural practices and land use in the last few decades may contribute to this growth in prevalence in Tunisia's central and southern regions [83]. Indeed, ecological changes can affect the abundance of some wildlife species which can be a reservoir of *Leishmania*. Indeed, in some regions of Tunisia, Chemkhi et al., [84] have observed an abundance of hedgehogs and demonstrated they are infected by *L. infantum*. In addition, ecological changes, subsequent to the construction of a dam in central Tunisia, were at the origin of the abundance of rodents (*Meriones shawi* and *Psammomys obesus*) reservoirs of *L. major* that caused an epidemic zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in local human population [5]. The migratory habits of mammal reservoirs may contribute to spreading out the disease. Worldwide, several wild animals have been reported to act as reservoirs in the transmission cycle of leishmaniasis, including in North Africa [85,86]. The proliferation of wild animals and rodents, in particular, offers a suitable habitat and blood sources to sandflies, which contribute to increasing vector abundance [87]. Studying the role of these animals is highly complex and requires multidisciplinary expertise a One Health approach.

Recent increases in livestock farming, particularly of sheep [88], poultry, and cattle may have created a propitious context for the exponential growth of phlebotomine species [83,89,90]. In fact, the development of animal husbandry, especially in Tunisia's semi-arid and arid regions, has produced enormous quantities of poultry feces and livestock manure that are favorable breeding sites for the development of phlebotomine sand fly larvae. Farmers also use manure and poultry feces to enrich the soil. The majority of farmers in arid areas irrigate with groundwater pumped from wells. This change in land use generates moisture in a soil enriched with organic matter that makes it more favorable for phlebotomine larval development, particularly *P. perniciosus* and *P. perfiliewi*. Indeed, the larvae of these phlebotomines colonize
domestic environments and are adapted to moist soil enriched with organic matter (livestock excrement) in which females have most probably laid eggs [91-93]. Climate change, including global warming, are proven influences on vector abundance and therefore on CanL prevalence [94,95]. In central Tunisia (Kairouan), average temperatures oscillating between a 20°C minimum and 38°C maximum from June-September (the active period of phlebotomines) are quite favorable for the development of *Leishmania* in the vector. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects a likely rise in global mean temperatures of 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 [96]; the Mediterranean region is considered one of the most sensitive areas for such higher temperatures.

Ecological, agronomic, social, and climatic factors have all contributed to the expansion of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in dogs and in humans in Tunisia and elsewhere. In Tunisia, agricultural practices such as breeding activities are the primary factor in favoring the establishment and proliferation of phlebotomine sandflies and must, therefore, be considered in any leishmaniasis control program. Consequently, and in view of our results and field observations, manure should be buried in the ground and plowed frequently as an additional prevention for zoonotic leishmaniasis in endemic areas. In addition, (i) stray and owned dogs should be monitored, and health and preventive methods should be put in place (e.g. sterilization, insecticide-impregnated dog collars, vaccine), (ii) Sand fly population should be controlled with insecticides in nearby animal shelters and potential phlebotomine sand fly habitats [97]. Adopting all of these strategies together has been suggested. We note that euthanizing infected dogs as a control method is unacceptable for ethical and social reasons and was therefore abandoned in Tunisia.

## Conclusion

In conclusion, this epidemiological survey highlighted that CanL infection in dog populations is prevalent in all bioclimatic areas in Tunisia and confirms the ongoing spread of the infection of dogs in arid zones. This expansion of infection in the dog population may well result from ecological, agronomic, social and climatic factors affecting the presence and density of phlebotomine vectors and wild and domestic animals but further investigations in CanL in arid regions are necessary to identify the factors implicated in the rapid spread and evolution of this disease to develop better prevention measures for humans and animals alike.

## Acknowledgments

We would like to express our thanks to veterinarians for their help in dog sampling. We also thank Dr. Deborah Glassman for English corrections and Aymen Mamlouk for statistics analysis help.

## Author Contributions

**Conceptualization:** Ali Bouattour, Youmna M'ghirbi.

**Data curation:** Amine Amri, Ons Fezaa.

**Formal analysis:** Amine Amri.

**Investigation:** Ali Bouattour, Adel Rhim, Ons Fezaa, Jean-Charles Gantier, Youmna M'ghirbi.

**Methodology:** Ali Bouattour, Jean-Charles Gantier, Youmna M'ghirbi.

**Software:** Jaber Amine Belkhiria.

**Supervision:** Ali Bouattour, Youmna M'ghirbi.
**Validation:** Ali Bouattour, Jean-Charles Gantier.

**Visualization:** Ali Bouattour.

**Writing – original draft:** Ali Bouattour.

**Writing – review & editing:** Jaber Amine Belkiria, Youmna M'ghirbi.

## References

1. Carvalho BM, Rangel EF, Vale MM. Evaluation of the impacts of climate change on disease vectors through ecological niche modelling. Bull Entomol Res. 2017; 107:419-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485316001097 PMID: 27974065

2. Koch LK, Kochmann J, Klimpel S, Cunze S. Modeling the climatic suitability of leishmaniasis vector species in Europe. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:13325. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13822-1 PMID: 29042642

3. Toumi A, Chlif S, Bettaieb J, Ben Alaya N, Boukthir A, Ahmadi ZE, et al. Temporal dynamics and impact of climate factors on the incidence of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in central Tunisia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012; 6:e1633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001633 PMID: 22563513

4. Palatnik-de-Sousa CB, Day MJ. One Health: The global challenge of epidemic and endemic leishmaniasis. Parasit Vectors. 2011; 4:197. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-197 PMID: 21985335

5. Ben Slah A, Kamarianakis Y, Chlif S, Alaya NB, Prastacos P. Zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in central Tunisia: spatio-temporal dynamics. Int J Epidemiol. 2007; 36:991-1000. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dym125 PMID: 17591639

6. Leishmaniasis [Internet]. [cited 4 juin 2021]. available on https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis

7. Ripani A, Mérot J, Bouguedour R, Zrelli M. Review of rabies situation and control in the North African region with a focus on Tunisia. Rev Sci Tech Int Off Epizoot. 2017; 36:831-8. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.36.3.2718 PMID: 30160705

8. Belhadj S, Pratlong F, Toumi NH, Kallel K, Mahjoub H, Babba H, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis in Tunisia: result of the isoenzymatic characterization of 65 Leishmania infantum strains. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002; 96:627-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90332-9 PMID: 12625137

9. Aoun K, Jeddi F, Amri F, Ghrab J, Bouratbine A. Current epidemiological data on visceral leishmaniasis in Tunisia. Med Mal Infect. 2009; 39:775-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2009.08.010 PMID: 19796895

10. Zoghlami Z, Chouihi E, Barhoumi W, Dachraoui K, Massoudi N, Helel KB, et al. Interaction between canine and human visceral leishmaniasis in a holoendemic focus of Central Tunisia. Acta Trop. 2014; 139:32-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acatropica.2014.06.012 PMID: 25004438

11. Killick-Kendrick R. Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review. Med Vet Entomol. 1990; 4:1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.1990.tb00255.x PMID: 2132963

12. Benabid M, Ghrab J, Rhim A, Ben-Romdhane R, Aoun K, Bouratbine A. Temporal dynamics and Leishmania infantum infection prevalence of Phlebotomus perniciosus (Diptera, Phlebotominae) in highly endemic areas of visceral leishmaniasis in Tunisia. PloS One. 2017; 12:e0184700. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184700 PMID: 28934263

13. Ben Rachid MS, Hamza B, Tabbane C, Gharbi R, Jedidi H, Ben Said M. Current status of leishmaniasis in Tunisia. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop. 1983; 63:29-40. PMID: 6859971

14. Ben Salah A, Ben Ismail R, Amri F, Chlif S, Ben Rzig F, Kharrat H, et al. Investigation of the spread of human visceral leishmaniasis in central Tunisia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000; 94:382-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0035-9203(00)90112-3 PMID: 11127239

15. Chadli: Chronique des leishmanioses en Tunisie—Google Scholar [Internet]. [cited 2 juin 2021]. Available on https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Chronique%20des%20leishmanioses%20en%20Tunisie&journal=Arch%20Inst%20Pasteur%20Tunis&volume=45&pages=1-14&publication_year=1968&author=Chadli%2CA&author=Ben%20Rachid%2CS&author=Fhaiel%2CA

16. Chargui N, Haouas N, Slama D, Gorcii M, Jaouadi K, Essabbah-Aguir N, et al. Transmission of visceral leishmaniasis in a previously non-endemic region of Tunisia: detection of Leishmania DNA in Phlebotomus perniciosus. J Vector Ecol J Soc Vector Ecol. 2013; 38:1-5.

17. Chargui N, Haouas N, Gorcii M, Akrout Messaidi F, Zribi M, Babba H. Increase of canine leishmaniasis in a previously low-endemicity area in Tunisia. Parasite Paris Fr. 2007; 14:247-51.

18. Diouani MF, Ben Alaya Bouafif N, Bettaib J, Louzir H, Jedidi S, Ftaiti A, et al. Dogs L. infantum infection from an endemic region of the north of Tunisia: a prospective study. Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis. 2008; 85:55-61. PMID: 19469416
19. Zhioua E, Kaabi B, Chelbi I. Entomological investigations following the spread of visceral leishmaniasis in Tunisia. Journal of Vector Ecology. 2007; 32(2), 371–374. https://doi.org/10.3376/1081-1710(2007)32[371:EIFTSO]2.0.CO;2

20. Solano-Gallego L, Baneth G. Canine Leishmaniosis: a challenging zoonosis. The European Journal of Companion Animal Practice. 2008 Jan 1; 18:1–10.

21. Lachaud L, Marchergui-Hammami S, Chabbert E, Dereure J, Dedet JP, Bastien P. Comparison of six PCR methods using peripheral blood for detection of canine visceral leishmaniasis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002; 40:210–5. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.1.210-215.2002 PMID: 11773118

22. Croset H, Rioux JA, Maistre M, Bayar N. The phlebotomines of Tunisia (Diptera-Phlebotominae). A revision of the systematics, distribution and behaviour (author's transl). Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1978; 53:711–49. PMID: 754625

23. Ghrab J, Rhim A, Bach-Hamba D, Chahed MK, Aoun K, Nouira S, et al. Phlebotominae (Diptera: Psychodidae) of human leishmaniosis sites in Tunisia. Parasite Paris Fr. 2006; 13:23–33. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2006131023 PMID: 16605064

24. R Core Team (2020).—European Environment Agency [Internet]. [cited 11 oct 2021]. Available on https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/oxygen-consuming-substances-in-rivers/r-development-core-team-2006

25. Velez R, Ballart C, Domenech E, Abras A, Fernández-Arévalo A, Gómez SA, et al. Seroprevalence of canine Leishmania infantum infection in the Mediterranean region and identification of risk factors: The example of North-Eastern and Pyrenean areas of Spain. Prev Vet Med. 2019; 162:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.015 PMID: 30621900

26. Solano-Gallego L, Morell P, Arboix M, Alberola J, Ferrer L. Prevalence of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs living in an area of canine leishmaniasis endemicity using PCR on several tissues and serology. J Clin Microbiol. 2001; 39:560–3. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.2.560-563.2001 PMID: 11158106

27. Leontides LS, Saridomichelakis MN, Billinis C, Kontos V, Koutinas AF, Galatos AD, et al. A cross-sectional study of Leishmania spp. infection in clinically healthy dogs with polymerase chain reaction and serology in Greece. Vet Parasitol. 2002; 109:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00201-7 PMID: 12383622

28. Medkour H, Laidoudi Y, Lafri I, Davoust B, Mekroud A, Bitam I, et al. Canine vector-borne protozoa: Molecular and serological investigation for Leishmania spp., Trypanosoma spp., Babesia spp., and Hepatozoon spp. in dogs from Northern Algeria. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Rep. 2020; 19:100353.

29. Mancianti F, Falcone ML, Giannelli C, Poli A. Comparison between an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a detergent-soluble Leishmania infantum antigen and indirect immunofluorescence for the diagnosis of canine leishmaniosis. Vet Parasitol. 1995; 59:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(94)00738-x PMID: 7571333

30. Boelaert M, Aoun K, Liinev J, Goetghebeur E, Van der Stuyft P. The potential of latent class analysis in diagnostic test validation for canine Leishmania infantum infection. Epidemiol Infect. 1999; 123:499–506. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268899003040 PMID: 10694163

31. Terrestrial Manual Online Access [Internet]. OIE—World Organ. Anim. Health. [cited 1 juin 2021]. Available on https://www.oie.int/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-manual-online-access/

32. Boussaa S, Kasbari M, El Mzabi A, Boumezzough A. Epidemiological Investigation of Canine Leishmaniasis in Southern Morocco. Adv Epidemiol. Hindawi; 2014; 2014:e104697.

33. Alonso F, Giménez Font P, Manchón M, Ruiz de Ybáñez R, Segovia M, Berriatua E. Geographical variation and factors associated to seroprevalence of canine leishmaniosis in an endemic Mediterranean area. Zoonoses Public Health. 2010; 57:318–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01228.x PMID: 19486495

34. Mahshid M, Baharak A, Iraj S, Sina K, Javad K, Mehdi B. Seroprevalence of canine visceral leishmaniasis in southeast of Iran. J Parasit Dis Off Organ Indian Soc Parasitol. 2014; 38:218–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-012-0226-9 PMID: 24808656

35. Adel A, Berkvens D, Abatih E, Soukehal A, Bianchini J, Saegerman C. Evaluation of Immunofluorescence Antibody Test Used for the Diagnosis of Canine Leishmaniasis in the Mediterranean Basin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PloS One. 2016; 11:e0161051. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161051 PMID: 27537405

36. Mettler M, Grimm F, Capelli G, Camp H, Deplazes P. Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, an immunofluorescent-antibody test, and two rapid tests (immunochromatographic-dipstick and gel tests) for serological diagnosis of symptomatic and asymptomatic Leishmania infections in dogs. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43:5515–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.11.5515-5519.2005 PMID: 16272479
37. Travi BL, Cordeiro-da-Silva A, Dantas-Torres F, Miró G. Canine visceral leishmaniasis: Diagnosis and management of the reservoir living among us. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018; 12:e0006082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006082 PMID: 29324838

38. Solano-Gallego L, Koutinas A, Miró G, Cardoso L, Pennisi MG, Ferrer L, et al. Directions for the diagnosis, clinical staging, treatment and prevention of canine leishmaniosis. Vet Parasitol. 2009; 165:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.022 PMID: 19559536

39. Solano-Gallego L, Miró G, Koutinas A et al. LeishVet guidelines for the practical management of canine leishmaniosis. Parasites Vectors. 2011; 4, 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-86

40. Proverbio D, Spada E, Bagnagatti de Giorgi G, Perego R, Valena E. Relationship between Leishmania IFAT titer and clinicopathological manifestations (clinical score) in dogs. BioMed Res Int. 2014; 2014:412808. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/412808 PMID: 24995294

41. de Freitas JCC, Lopes-Neto BE, de Abreu CRA, Coura-Vital W, Braga SL, Reis AB, et al. Profile of anti-Leishmania antibodies related to clinical picture in canine visceral leishmaniasis. Res Vet Sci. 2012; 93:705-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.12.009 PMID: 22226072

42. Mendonça IL de Batista JF, Schallig H, Cruz M do SPE, Alonso DP, Ribolla PEM, et al. The performance of serological tests for Leishmania infantum infection screening in dogs depends on the prevalence of the disease. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2017; 59:e39. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946201759039 PMID: 28591267

43. Lira RA, Cavalcanti MP, Nakazawa M, Ferreira AGP, Silva ED, Abath FGC, et al. Canine visceral leishmaniosis: a comparative analysis of the EIE-leishmaniose-visceral-canina-Bio-Manguinhos and the IFI-leishmaniose-visceral-canina-Bio-Manguinhos kits. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 137:11-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.12.020 PMID: 16446034

44. Selder R, Weber K, Bergmann M, Geisweid K, Hartmann K. Sensitivity and specificity of an in-clinic point-of-care PCR test for the diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis. Vet J Lond Engl 1997. 2018; 232:46-51.

45. Zanette MF, Lima VMF de, Laurenti MD, Rossi CN, Vides JP, Vieira RF da C, et al. Serological cross-reactivity of Trypanosoma cruzi, Ehrlichia canis, Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Babesia canis to Leishmania infantum chagasi tests in dogs. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical-SBMT; 2014; 47:105-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-1723-2013 PMID: 24603745

46. Laurenti MD, de Santana Leandro MV, Tomokane TY, De Lucca HRL, Aschar M, Souza CSF, et al. Comparative evaluation of the DPP CVL rapid test for canine serodiagnosis in area of visceral leishmaniasis. Vet Parasitol. 2014; 205:444-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.09.002 PMID: 25257505

47. Aoun K, Amri F, Chouihi E, Haouas N, Bedoui K, Benikhlef R, et al. Epidemiology of Leishmania (L.) infantum, L. major and L. killicki in Tunisia: results and analysis of the identification of 226 human and canine isolates. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 1990. 2008; 101:323-8. https://doi.org/10.3185/pathexo3201 PMID: 18956815

48. Baneth G, Yasur-Landau D, Gilad M, Nachum-Biala Y. Canine leishmaniosis caused by Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica: comparative findings and serology. Parasit Vectors. 2017; 10:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2050-7 PMID: 28285601

49. Monteiro FM, Machado AS, Rocha-Silva F, Assunção CB, Graciele-Melo C, Costa LE, et al. Canine visceral leishmaniasis: Detection of Leishmania spp. genome in peripheral blood of seropositive dogs by real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR). Microb Pathog. 2019; 126:263-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.10.036 PMID: 30419342

50. Lopes EG, Sevá AP, Ferreira F, Nunes CM, Keid LB, Hiramoto RM, et al. Serological and molecular diagnostic tests for canine visceral leishmaniasis in Brazilian endemic area: one out of five seronegative dogs are infected. Epidemiol Infect. 2017; 145:2436-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268817001443 PMID: 28726597

51. Chargui N, Haouas N, Gorcii M, Lahmar S, Guesmi M, Ben Abdelhafidh A, et al. Use of PCR, IFAT and in vitro culture in the detection of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs and evaluation of the prevalence of canine leishmaniasis in a low endemic area in Tunisia. Parasite Paris Fr. 2009; 16:65-9.

52. Paltrinieri S, Solano-Gallego L, Fondati A, Lubas G, Gradoni L, Castagnaro M, Crotti A, Maroli M, Oliva G, Roura X, Zatelli A, Zini E; Canine Leishmaniasis Working Group, Italian Society of Veterinarians of Companion Animals. Guidelines for diagnosis and clinical classification of leishmaniasis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010;1; 236(11):1184-91. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.236.11.1184 PMID: 20513195.

53. Sykes JE, Baneth G, Petersen CA. Leishmaniosis. Canine Feline Infect Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2013;713-26.
54. Reale S, Maxia L, Vitale F, Glorioso NS, Caracappa S, Vesco G. Detection of Leishmania infantum in dogs by PCR with lymph node aspirates and blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37:2931-5. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.37.9.2931-2935.1999 PMID: 10449478

55. Reithinger R, Lambson BE, Barker DC, Davies CR. Use of PCR to detect Leishmania (Viannia) spp. in dog blood and bone marrow. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38:748-51. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.38.2.748-751.2000 PMID: 10655379

56. Rodríguez A, Solano-Gallego L, Ojeda A, Quintana J, Riera C, Gállego M, et al. Dynamics of Leishmania-specific immunoglobulin isotypes in dogs with clinical leishmaniasis before and after treatment. J Vet Intern Med. 2006; 20:495-8. https://doi.org/10.1892/0891-6640(2006)20[495:doliii]2.0.co;2 PMID: 16734080

57. Olías-Molero AI, Corral MJ, Jiménez-Antón MD, Alunda JM. Early antibody response and clinical outcome in experimental canine leishmaniasis. Sci Rep. 2019; 9:18606. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55087-w PMID: 31819140

58. Solano-Gallego L, Llull J, Ramos G, Riera C, Arboix M, Alberola J, et al. The Ibizian hound presents a predominantly cellular immune response against natural Leishmania infection. Vet Parasitol. 2000; 90:37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(00)00223-5 PMID: 10828510

59. Dantas-Torres F, de Brito MEF, Brandão-Filho SP. Seroepidemiological survey on canine leishmaniasis among dogs from an urban area of Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 140:54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.03.008 PMID: 16621286

60. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F. The prevention of canine leishmaniasis and its impact on public health. Trends Parasitol. 2013; 29:339-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2013.05.003 PMID: 23746747

61. Moreno J, Alvar J. Canine leishmaniasis: epidemiological risk and the experimental model. Trends Parasitol. 2002; 18:399-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1471-4922(02)02347-4 PMID: 12377257

62. Fisa R, Gállego M, Castillejo S, Aisa MJ, Serra T, Riera C, et al. Epidemiology of canine leishmaniosis in Catalonia (Spain) the example of the Priorat focus. Vet Parasitol. 1999; 83:87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(99)00074-6 PMID: 10392965

63. Molina R, Amelia C, Nieto J, San-Andrés M, González F, Castillo JA, et al. Infectivity of dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum to colonized Phlebotomus perniciosus. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1994; 88:491-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0035-9203(94)90446-4 PMID: 7570854

64. Miró G, Gálvez R, Fraile C, Descalzo MA, Molina R. Infectivity to Phlebotomus perniciosus of dogs naturally parasitized with Leishmania infantum after different treatments. Parasit Vectors. 2011; 4:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-52 PMID: 21489241

65. Rami M, Atarhouch T, Sabri M, Cadi Soussi M, Benazzou T, Dakkak A. Canine leishmaniasis in the Rif mountains (Moroccan Mediterranean coast): a seroepidemiological survey. Parasite Paris Fr. 2003; 10:79-85. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2003101p77 PMID: 12669354

66. Mohebali M, Moradi-Asl E, Rassi Y. Geographic distribution and spatial analysis of Leishmania infantum infection in domestic and wild animal reservoir hosts of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in Iran: A systematic review. J Vector Borne Dis. 2018; 55:173-83. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9062.249125 PMID: 30618442

67. Boggiatto PM, Gibson-Corley KN, Metz K, Gallup JM, Hostetter JM, Mullin K, et al. Transplacental transmission of Leishmania infantum as a means for continued disease incidence in North America. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011; 5:e1019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001019 PMID: 21532741

68. Vida B, Toepp A, Schaut RG, Esch KJ, Juelsgaard R, Shimak RM, et al. Immunologic progression of canine leishmaniosis following vertical transmission in United States dogs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2016; 169:34-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2015.11.008 PMID: 26827836

69. Ben Slimane T, Chouihi E, Ben Hadj Ahmed S, Chelbi I, Barhoumi W, Cherni S, et al. An investigation on vertical transmission of Leishmania infantum in experimentally infected dogs and assessment of off-spring's infectiousness potential by xenodiagnosis. Vet Parasitol. 2014; 206:282-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.10.020 PMID: 25468025

70. Maroli M, Gramiccia M, Gradoni L. Natural infection of Phlebotomus perfiliewi with Leishmania infantum in a cutaneous leishmaniasis focus of the Abruzzi region, Italy. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987; 81:596-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0035-9203(87)90420-2 PMID: 3445341

71. Maroli M, Feliciangeli MD, Bichaud L, Charrel RN, Gradoni L. Phlebotomine sandflies and the spreading of leishmaniasis and other diseases of public health concern. Med Vet Entomol. 2013; 27:123-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2012.01034.x PMID: 22924419

72. Bongiorno G, Habluetzel A, Khoury C, Maroli M. Host preferences of phlebotomine sand flies at a hypoendemic focus of canine leishmaniasis in central Italy. Acta Trop. 2003; 88:109-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-706x(03)00190-6 PMID: 14516922
73. Rossi E, Bongiorno G, Ciolli E, Di Muccio T, Scalone A, Gramiccia M, et al. Seasonal phenology, host-blood feeding preferences and natural Leishmania infection of Phlebotomus perniciosus (Diptera, Psychodidae) in a high-endemic focus of canine leishmaniasis in Rome province, Italy. Acta Trop. 2008; 105:158-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.10.005 PMID: 18035329

74. Bouratbine A, Aoun K, Gharbi M, Haouas N, Zaroui J, Harrat Z, et al. Epidemiological, clinical and parasitological data about canine leishmaniasis in Tunisia. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 1990. 2005; 98:359-62. PMID: 16425713

75. Chargui N, Amro A, Haouas N, Schönian G, Babba H, Schmidt S, et al. Population structure of Tunisian Leishmania infantum and evidence for the existence of hybrids and gene flow between genetically different populations. Int J Parasitol. 2009; 39:801-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.11.016 PMID: 19211023

76. Dancesco P, Chadli A. Bioecologic aspects of Phlebotomine sandflies in relation to human and canine visceral leishmaniasis in northern Tunisia. Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis. 1982; 59:225-41. PMID: 7168593

77. Vermeil C. Leishmaniasis in Tunisia. Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis. 1956; 33:195-201.

78. Chadli A, Ben Rachid MS, Fhaïel A. Chronique des leishmanioses en Tunisie. Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis. 1968; 45:1-14.

79. Dedet JP. Épidémiologie de la Leishmaniose viscérale en Tunesie: étude des réservoirs de virus: incidence et répartition de la Leishmaniose canine [PhD Thesis]. 1971.

80. Ayadi A, Ben Ismail R, Ben Rachid MS. Extension of the transmission area of kala-azar caused by Leishmania infantum (Nicolle 1908) to the center and south of Tunisia. Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis. 1991; 68:269-73. PMID: 1824507

81. Besbes A, Pousse H, Ben Said M, Kharrat H, Ghenimi L. Leishmanioses viscérales infantiles du centre tunisien (221 cas). Médecine Mal Infect. 1994; 24:628-34.

82. Dedet J, Osman FB, Chadli A, Croset H, Rioux JA. Leishmaniasis in Tunisia. Sero-immunological survey about the frequency of infestation (author's transl). Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1973; 48:653-60. PMID: 4208566

83. Barhoumi W, Qualls WA, Archer RS, Fuller DO, Chelbi I, Cherni S, et al. Irrigation in the arid regions of Tunisia impacts the abundance and apparent density of sand fly vectors of Leishmania infantum. Acta Trop. 2015; 141:73-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.10.008 PMID: 25447265

84. Chemkhi J, Souguir H, Ali IBH, Driss M, Guizani I, Guerbouj S. Natural infection of Algerian hedgehog, Atelerix algirus (Lereboulet 1842) with Leishmania parasites in Tunisia. Acta Trop. 2015; 150:42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.06.009 PMID: 26086952

85. Ghawar W, Toumi A, Snoussi M-A, Chlif S, Zåatour A, Boukthir A, et al. Leishmania major infection among Psammomys obesus and Meriones shawi: reservoirs of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Sidi Bouzid (central Tunisia). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis Larchmt N. 2011; 11:1561-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2011.0712 PMID: 21919726

86. Millán J, Ferroglio E, Solano-Gallego L. Role of wildlife in the epidemiology of Leishmania infantum infection in Europe. Parasitol Res. 2014; 113:2005-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-3929-2 PMID: 24804923

87. Navea-Pérez HM, Díaz-Sáez V, Corpas-López V, Merino-Espinosa G, Morillas-Márquez F, Martín-Sánchez J. Leishmania infantum in wild rodents: reservoirs or just irrelevant incidental hosts? Parasitol Res. 2015; 114:2363-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4434-y PMID: 25797596

88. Jemaa T, Huguenin J, Moulin C-H, Najar T. Les systèmes d'élevage de petits ruminants en Tunisie Centrale: stratégies différenciées et adaptations aux transformations du territoire. Cah. Agric. 2016; 25, 45005-45013. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2016030

89. Harhay MO, Olliaro PL, Costa DL, Costa CHN. Urban parasitology: visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil. Trends Parasitol. 2011; 27:403-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2011.04.001 PMID: 21596622

90. Saraiva L, Andrade Filho JD, Falcão AL, de Carvalho DAA, de Souza CM, Freitas CR, et al. Phlebotominae fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an urban district of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, endemic for visceral leishmaniasis: characterization of favored locations as determined by spatial analysis. Acta Trop. 2011; 117:137-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.11.007 PMID: 21110938

91. Bettini S, Contini C, Atzeni MC, Tocco G. Leishmaniasis in Sardinia I. Observations on a larval breeding site of Phlebotomus perniciosus, Phlebotomus perfiliewi perfiliewi and Sergentomyia minuta (Diptera: Psychodidae) in the canine leishmaniasis focus of Soleminis (Cagliari). Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1986; 80:307-15. PMID: 3800470

92. Bettini S, Melis P. Leishmaniasis in Sardinia. III. Soil analysis of a breeding site of three species of sandflies. Med Vet Entomol. 1988; 2:67-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.1988.tb00049.x PMID: 2980160
93. Feliciangeli MD. Natural breeding places of phlebotomine sandflies. Med Vet Entomol. 2004; 18:71-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-283x.2004.0487.x PMID: 15009450

94. Ballart C, Guerrero I, Castells X, Barón S, Castillejo S, Alcover MM, et al. Importance of individual analysis of environmental and climatic factors affecting the density of Leishmania vectors living in the same geographical area: the example of Phlebotomus ariasi and P. perniciosus in northeast Spain. Geospatial Health. 2014; 8:389-403. https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2014.28 PMID: 24893016

95. Prudhomme J, Rahola N, Toty C, Cassan C, Roiz D, Vergnes B, et al. Ecology and spatiotemporal dynamics of sandflies in the Mediterranean Languedoc region (Roquedur area, Gard, France). Parasit Vectors. 2015; 8:642. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1250-2 PMID: 26683841

96. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T. IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. (eds.) World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 32 pp. 2018.

97. Bi K, Chen Y, Zhao S, Kuang Y, John Wu C-H. Current Visceral Leishmaniasis Research: A Research Review to Inspire Future Study. BioMed Res Int. 2018; 2018:9872095. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9872095 PMID: 30105272