# AlgaeTraits: a trait database for (European) seaweeds

Sofie Vranken, Marine Robuchon, Stefanie Dekeyzer, Ignacio Bárbara, Inka Bartsch, Aurélie Blanfuné, Charles-François Boudouresque, Wim Decock, Christophe Destombe, Bruno de Reviers, et al.

► To cite this version:

Sofie Vranken, Marine Robuchon, Stefanie Dekeyzer, Ignacio Bárbara, Inka Bartsch, et al. Algae-Traits: a trait database for (European) seaweeds. Earth System Science Data, 2023, 15 (7), pp.2711-2754. 10.5194/essd-15-2711-2023. mnhn-04158627

HAL Id: mnhn-04158627

https://mnhn.hal.science/mnhn-04158627

Submitted on 12 Jul 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# AlgaeTraits: a trait database for (European) seaweeds

Sofie Vranken<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />,*, Marine Robuchon<fnref n="3" />,<fnref n="4" />,<fnref n="5" />,*, Stefanie Dekeyzer<fnref n="1" />, Ignacio Bárbara<fnref n="6" />, Inka Bartsch<fnref n="7" />,
Aurélie Blanfuné<fnref n="8" />, Charles-François Boudouresque<fnref n="8" />, Wim Decock<fnref n="1" />, Christophe Destombe<fnref n="9" />,
Bruno de Reviers<fnref n="3" />, Pilar Díaz-Tapia<fnref n="6" />,<fnref n="10" />, Anne Herbst<fnref n="11" />, Romain Julliard<fnref n="4" />, Rolf Karez<fnref n="12" />, Priit Kersen<fnref n="13" />,
Stacy A. Krueger-Hadfield<fnref n="14" />, Ralph Kuhlenkamp<fnref n="15" />, Akira F. Peters<fnref n="16" />, Viviana Peña<fnref n="6" />,
Cristina Piñeiro-Corbeira<fnref n="6" />, Fabio Rindi<fnref n="17" />, Florence Rousseau<fnref n="4" />, Jan Rueness<fnref n="18" />, Hendrik Schubert<fnref n="19" />,
Kjersti Sjøtun<fnref n="20" />, Marta Sansón<fnref n="21" />, Dan Smale<fnref n="22" />, Thierry Thibaut<fnref n="8" />, Myriam Valero<fnref n="9" />, Leen Vandepitte<fnref n="1" />,
Bart Vanhoorne<fnref n="1" />, Alba Vergés<fnref n="23" />, Marc Verlaque<fnref n="8" />, Christophe Vieira<fnref n="24" />, Line Le Gall<fnref n="3" />,
Frederik Leliaert<fnref n="25" />, and Olivier De Clerck<fnref n="1" />

<footnote n="1">¹Biology Department, Research Group Phycology, Ghent University, Ghent, 9000, Belgium</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), InnovOcean Campus, Jacobsenstraat 1, Oostende, 8400, Belgium</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Sorbonne Université, École Pratique des Hautes Études, Université des Antilles, Paris, 75005, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴Centre d'Écologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75005, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission, Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Ispra (VA), 21027, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶BIOCOST Research Group, Faculdade de Ciencias, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, 15071, Spain</footnote>

<footnote n="7">⁷Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany</footnote>

<footnote n="8">⁸CNRS, IRD, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), Aix-Marseille University and Université de Toulon, Marseille, UM 110, France</footnote>

<footnote n="9">⁹IRL 3614, CNRS, SU, UACH, PUC, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, Roscoff, 29688, France</footnote>

<footnote n="10">¹⁰Centro Nacional Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), Centro Oceanográfico de A Coruña, A Coruña, 15001, Spain</footnote>

<footnote n="11">¹¹Department Maritime Systeme, Interdisziplinäre Fakultät, 18057 Rostock, Germany</footnote>

<footnote n="12">¹²State Agency for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Areas Schleswig-Holstein, 24220 Flintbek, Germany</footnote>

<footnote n="13">¹³Plant Protection and Fertilisers Department, Agriculture and Food Board, Teaduse 2, Saku, Harjumaa, 75501, Estonia</footnote>

<footnote n="14">¹⁴Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="15">¹⁵Phycomarin, 21149 Hamburg, Germany</footnote>

<footnote n="16">¹⁶Bezhin Rosko, Santec, 29250, France</footnote>

<footnote n="17">¹⁷Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona, 60131, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="18">¹⁸Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0315, Norway</footnote>

<footnote n="19">¹⁹Institute for Biosciences, University Rostock, Rostock, 18051, Germany</footnote>

<footnote n="20">²⁰Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, 5020, Norway</footnote>

<footnote n="21">²¹Departamento de Botánica, Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, 38200, Canary Islands, Spain</footnote>

<footnote n="22">²²Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK</footnote>

<footnote n="23">²³Marine Resources and Biodiversity Research Group (GRMAR), Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, Girona, 17003, Spain</footnote>

<footnote n="24">²⁴Research Institute for Basic Sciences, Jeju National University, Jeju, 63243, South Korea</footnote>

<footnote n="25">²⁵Meise Botanic Garden, Meise, 1860, Belgium</footnote>
★These authors contributed equally to this work.

**Correspondence:** Sofie Vranken (sofie.vranken@ugent.be) and Olivier De Clerck
(olivier.declerck@ugent.be)

Received: 27 September 2022 – Discussion started: 14 October 2022

Revised: 19 April 2023 – Accepted: 20 April 2023 – Published: 4 July 2023

**Abstract.** The analysis of biological and ecological traits has a long history in evolutionary and ecological research. However, trait data are often scattered and standardised terminology that transcends taxonomic and biogeographical context are generally missing. As part of the development of a global trait database of marine species, we collated trait information for European seaweeds and structured the data within the standardised framework of the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS). We collected 45 175 trait records for 21 biologically and ecologically relevant traits of seaweeds. This resulted in a trait database for 1745 European seaweed species of which more than half (56%) of the records were documented at the species level, while the remaining 44% were documented at a higher taxonomic level and subsequently inherited at lower levels. The trait database for European seaweeds will serve as a foundation for future research on diversity and evolution of seaweeds and their responses to global changes. The data will contribute to developing detailed trait-based ecosystem models and will be an important tool to inform marine conservation policies. The data are publicly accessible through the AlgaeTraits portal, https://doi.org/10.14284/574 (AlgaeTraits, 2022).

# 1 Introduction

Trait-based approaches, focusing on diversity of organis-
mal characteristics rather than species diversity, are an ef-
fective data source to answer important biological questions
(Costello et al., 2015; Beauchard et al., 2017; Degen et al.,
2018). Traditionally, traits have been and still are of signifi-
cant value for taxonomic research (Voultsiadou et al., 2017).
Moreover, as they enable the description and investigation of
complex ecosystems in relatively simple ways without hav-
ing to laboriously study each individual component species,
they are also integral to the study of the ecological and evolu-
tionary dynamics of populations, species, communities, and
ecosystems (Violle et al., 2007; Kattge et al., 2011; Degen
et al., 2018; Schleuning et al., 2020). For example, the anal-
ysis of trait data can assist in estimating responses to mul-
tiple stressors, including anthropogenic and climate change
impacts (Degen et al., 2018; Schleuning et al., 2020), and
may provide crucial information needed to develop effective
management strategies to counter negative consequences of
climate change (Bremner, 2008).

Although the importance of trait-based approaches is
widely recognised, there remains a general lack of accessible,
standardised, and harmonised trait data for aquatic organisms
(Costello et al., 2015; Beauchard et al., 2017; Degen et al.,
2018; Martini et al., 2021). Recent initiatives have intended
to resolve this gap and made significant progress for some
marine animals, including fishes, polychaetes, copepods, and
macroinvertebrates (reviewed in Martini et al., 2021), but
aquatic photoautotrophs, including marine macroalgae (or
seaweeds), remain underrepresented.

Seaweed traits and functional forms have been used for
at least one century as a tool to answer various ecologi-
cal and evolutionary questions. Since the early 1900s, traits
have been explored to formulate life-form classification
schemes for algae which intended to reflect habitat require-
ments and responses to environmental fluctuations (Chap-
man and Chapman, 1976; Feldmann, 1966) or describe dif-
ferent reproductive strategies (De Wreede and Kinger, 1988;
Bell, 1994) used to explain various evolutionary questions
(Heesch et al., 2021). In the 1980s, Littler and Littler (1980)
and Littler et al. (1983) used the adaptive value of mor-
phological traits to categorise algal species into morpho-
functional groups, which cluster species with similar ecolog-
ical functioning. As the concept of morpho-functional groups
is relatively easy to apply and can limit processing time
and associated costs, it has been frequently applied in sea-
weed ecology (Veiga et al., 2013; Vélez-Rubio et al., 2021).
As a result, multiple variations of the original six morpho-
functional groups have been developed and applied in a wide
range of contexts. For example, they have been applied to un-
derstand the distribution of communities along spatial (Ste-
neck and Dethier, 1994; Wieters et al., 2012; Gaspar et al.,
2017) or environmental scales (Balata et al., 2007; Gaspar et
al., 2017; Gómez et al., 2019; Gómez and Huovinen, 2020),
to understand the potential of communities to resist invasion
(Arenas et al., 2006), and to evaluate the ecological status of
coastal waters (Orfanidis et al., 2011). Yet, other recent re-
search indicates that current morpho-functional groups may
not capture enough variation to describe ecological function-
ing (Mauffrey et al., 2020; Ryznar et al., 2020) and call for
further development towards a broader trait-based approach
that includes non-morphological and other traits (Mauffrey et al., 2020).

Seaweed trait information remains largely scattered, not widely available, and not semantically standardised, which has hampered the development and application of phyco-logical trait-based approaches over broad taxonomic, spa-tial, or temporal scales. To overcome such drawbacks and enhance the development of a common ontology favour-ing the use and comparability of trait-based approaches on seaweeds, we present AlgaeTraits, a seaweed trait database for 1745 species occurring along the Atlantic and Mediter-ranean coasts of Europe. We expand the spectrum of com-monly used functional traits (i.e. measurable or quantifi-able properties of individuals; McGill et al., 2006) to in-clude data on habitat, seasonality, morphology, life cycle, life history, and biogeographical range (Fig. 1, Table A1). In total, we describe 21 traits linked to taxonomic infor-mation, covering 9 of the 10 previously prioritised traits in Costello et al. (2015). These data are available on the Algae-Traits data portal https://doi.org/10.14284/574 (AlgaeTraits, 2022), which is a subregister of the World Register of Ma-rine species (WoRMS, 2022; Marine Species Traits, 2022). Here we introduce AlgaeTraits by (i) presenting the method-ologies used to collect data, (ii) highlighting trait coverage for the current and first version of the database, and (iii) ex-ploring trait variability for a selected subset of traits.

## 2 Data

### 2.1 Trait collection

Trait data collection started with an extensive literature re-view in 2013, supported by the Biology project of the Eu-ropean Marine Observation and Data Network (EMODnet). In 2015, the data were further refined with expert opinions (Supplement S1). In total, more than 200 references were used and 33 experts (all co-authors on this article) con-tributed by filling out a survey. For specific traits where inter-specific variation is known to be minimal, trait information was documented in the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS, 2022) at the genus level. The database behind WoRMS (Aphia, Vandepitte et al., 2015, 2018, see further) is built in such a way that the information at the genus level is then automatically inherited to all species within this genus, if no information at the species level was provided or avail-able. Traits that may have substantial interspecific variation, such as blooming, seasonality, wave exposure, zonation, and body size (Table A1), were not inherited from the genus to species level and were only documented at the species level. Contributions were quality-checked to verify whether they conformed to the survey and the database format.

### 2.2 Trait data

We included 21 traits for marine seaweeds: 8 ecological traits, 4 morphological traits, 6 life cycle traits, and 3 life his-tory related traits (Fig. 1, Table A1). Ecological traits relate to the habitat of the seaweed with respect to environment (ma-rine, freshwater, brackish), tidal zonation, various degrees of wave exposure, environmental position (substrate), tolerance to organic pollutants, vertical space use, and seasonality. In the few instances where seaweed species are known for their potential to form blooms, this has been indicated as well (Fig. 1, Table A1). Morphological traits describe the thallus based on body shape, body size, calcification, and cytomor-phology (Fig. 1, Table A1). Body size is the only quantita-tive trait included in AlgaeTraits and can be documented as a mean, maximum, or minimum value to describe the thallus length or diameter. Life-history-related traits describe pat-terns that influence demography and population dynamics, while life cycle traits relate to the various stages an organism undergoes from one stage in its development (e.g. fertilisa-tion) to the same stage in the next generation (Albecker et al., 2021) (Fig. 1, Table A1). In addition to these 21 traits, species distributions were documented as ecoregions defined by Spalding et al. (2007) and can be used to subset the database according to geographic region. Moreover, WoRMS also displays species' occurrences of the Ocean Biodiver-sity Information System (OBIS; https://www.obis.org, last access: 2 March 2022) (Fig. 1). Contrary to the other traits, environment and distribution were not uploaded as traits (i.e. attributes) in the database system (Aphia; see further) but as environment flags and distributions. This implies that envi-ronment and distribution are slightly differently visualised on the AlgaeTraits data portal (https://www.algaetraits.org, last access: 10 September 2022).

### 2.3 Taxonomy

The total number of described seaweeds is estimated at 9250 species on a global scale (Appeltans et al., 2012; Guiry, 2012), of which at least 1800 species occur in Europe (Costello et al., 2022). The taxonomic classification of these species is not always straightforward and is continuously updated. To provide the best possible taxonomic accu-racy, the trait data were implemented in WoRMS. WoRMS aims to provide a complete taxonomic authoritative list of all currently published names of marine species and is synchronised with AlgaeBase, the most complete database on global algal taxonomic information (Guiry and Guiry, 2022).

### 2.4 Metadata

Every trait value is linked to a source (expert or literature) and a note field that can be used to include relevant meta-data related to specific trait values. As values for the traits asexual reproduction, macroalgal blooming, body size, and seasonality may display considerable geographic variation,
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** (a) Relation of AlgaeTraits to other databases. AlgaeTraits is a subregister of the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS), which aims to provide a comprehensive authoritative list of all published names of marine organisms and other biological information including traits. AlgaeBase, the most complete list on global algal taxonomy, is used as the main source for algal taxonomy in WoRMS. WoRMS and AlgaeTraits display OBIS occurrence data. All traits included in WoRMS and AlgaeTraits were collected under the EMODnet project. (b) All 21 traits currently included in AlgaeTraits can be categorised under morphology, life history, life cycle, and ecology.</figcaption></figure>

we assigned a specific locality to these trait values. Localities are defined as georegions obtained from the Marine Regions platform, which provides a hierarchical, standardised list of georeferenced marine regions and areas (https://www.marineregions.org, last access: 6 April 2022). As mentioned above, life cycles of seaweeds can be complex and often consist of different life stages with radically different morphological, physiological, and ecological characteristics (Fig. 2). When relevant, trait values are documented for the specific life cycle stage they apply to (i.e. sporophyte, gametophyte, microthallus, macrothallus).

## 2.5 Database structure and management

The AlgaeTraits database is a thematic subregister of WoRMS, part of the Aphia platform. The Aphia platform is an MS SQL (Microsoft Structured Query Language)

database specifically built to include taxonomic data and related information such as biological traits. In total, Aphia contains more than 400 data fields, which are maintained by more than 500 experts under guidance of the WoRMS steering committee, which takes the lead on setting priorities and future directions and coordination of the experts (Vandepitte et al., 2015, 2018). Both editors and database users are supported by a data management team that includes technical and scientific staff hosted at the Flinders Marine Institute (VLIZ) and can be contacted through info@marinespecies.org. This data management team is committed to safeguarding the integrity and online access of the database.
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Haplodiplontic**

a biphasic life cycle with free living haploid
gametophytic and diploid sporophytic phases
that both undergo mitosis. The gametophytic
and sporophytic phase can be similar in size
and morphology (isomorphic) or different
(heteromorphic). Here, sex determination
happens in the haploid phase.

E.g. isomorphic monoicous:
*Dermocorynus*; heteromorphic monoicous:
*Atractophora, Gloiosiphonia*; isomorphic
dioicous: *Gracilaria*; heteromorphic dioicous:
*Cutleria, Derbesia, Laminariales* (*kelps*)

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

Diplontic

a monomorphic life cycle where mitosis only
happens in the diploid phase, the haploid
phase is restricted to the unicellular gametes.
Here, sex determination happens in the diploid
phase. E.g. *Fucus, Cystoseira*

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

Haplontic

a monomorphic life cycle where mitosis only
happens in the haploid phase. Here, sex
determination happens in the haploid phase.
E.g. *Chara, Tolypella, Rhodophysema,*
*Pantoneura*

**Figure 2.** Life cycles of seaweeds. The sexual life cycle of seaweeds can be divided in three main categories: (1) biphasic haplodiplontic life cycle, (2) monophasic haplontic life cycle, or (3) monophasic diplontic life cycle. Male and female reproductive structures (haploid gametes) can be formed on the same or separate thalli (mono- vs. di-; light blue indicates production of male and female gametes on separate individuals), and sex determination can happen in both the haploid and diploid life phase (-oicous vs. -oecious). The form of the gametes can be (1) identical in size and morphology (isogamous), (2) different in size but both motile with flagella (anisogamous), or (3) different in morphology and size with a bigger non-motile female gamete lacking a flagella and smaller motile male gametes with flagella (oogamous), except for red algae in which the male gamete is also non-motile. n – haploid, 2n – diploid, F! – fertilisation, R! – meiosis.

3 Results

Twenty-one traits were documented resulting in 45 195 en-
tries for 2830 accepted taxa according to AlgaeBase, among
which 681 were at the genus level and 1742 at the species
level. Fifty-six percent of the trait entries for species were in-
herited from the genus level. Environment and cytomorphol-
ogy were the traits most documented for species, while the
least information was provided for the traits that show sub-
stantial variation within genera and that were not inherited
from genus to species level (Fig. 3).

3.1 Morphology-related traits

3.1.1 Body shape

Seaweeds are known for their wide variation in body shapes,
as illustrated in Fig. 4. For example, seaweeds can exist as

filaments (filamentous) or be leaf-like (foliose) or cushion-
like (saccate). They can trail closely along the surface (pros-
trate), be upright (erect), or take many other shapes (Ta-
ble A1, Fig. 4). Body shape had a high data coverage of 96 %
(1678 species) at the species level (Figs. 3, 5–7).

3.1.2 Body size

Seaweed body size was described in several dimensions (thallus length, diameter, width, thickness, height) and varied from a few micrometres in thickness or width (e.g. filamentous, turf forming species such as *Hapalospongidion macrocarpum*) to several metres long (e.g. kelp such as *Saccharina latissima*). Compared to other traits, body size had a relatively low data coverage of 28 % (490 species) for European accepted seaweed species (Figs. 3, 5–7).
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Number of taxonomically accepted species from Europe with trait information by trait. The dashed red line indicates the total number of accepted species (1742) according to AlgaeBase.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.1.3 Calcification

Several species in different taxonomic groups have calcified thalli (Figs. 8–10). In the green seaweed orders Dasycladales and Bryopsidales, calcification can occur as intra- or extracellular aragonite deposition, and both orders contain calcified articulated and calcified non-articulated species (Fig. 8). In European brown seaweeds, calcification is restricted to *Padina* (Dictyotales), where the surface of several species is covered with aragonite crystals (Benita et al., 2018) (Figs. 4a, 9). Calcification in various forms is present in four European orders of red seaweeds: in the Corallinales and Sporolithales as calcite in the cell walls (Figs. 4d, 10), whereas the Peyssonneliales and Nemaliales deposit aragonite (Pentecost, 1980). Calcification had a high data coverage of 96% (1670 species) on a European level (Figs. 3, 5–7).

### 3.1.4 Cytomorphology

Cytomorphology was the trait best documented on a European level and reached a data coverage of 99% (1726 species) (Figs. 4, 5–7). Although the trait which distinguishes unicellular from multicellular organisms and therefore might be perceived as trivial, in a seaweed context, it does set apart macroscopic multicellular thalli from a series of exotic cytomorphologies, including coenocytic and siphonal growth forms. Especially in green seaweeds (e.g. Bryopsidales and Dasycladales), the morphology of the thallus is decoupled from the formation of cells, which may result in thalli tens of centimetres tall and differentiated in blade-like structures, stolons and rhizoids while still being essentially unicellular.

## 3.2 Ecology-related traits

### 3.2.1 Environmental position

Environmental position was well documented on the European level with 94% (1636 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7). Most seaweeds grow attached to rock (epilithic) or other macrophytes (epiphytic), while some other species grow on animals (epizoic) or within rocks (endolithic), macrophytes (endophytic), or animals (endozoic) (Table A1). Many seaweeds are not very specific with respect to the substrate onto which they are attached. The same species may grow epilithically or epiphytically, but some species show high substrate specificity. Several diminutive algal species (e.g. *Acrochaete*, *Acrochaetium*, *Laminariocolax* and *Myrionema*) grow exclusively epiphytically, endophytically, or even endozoically on a variety of hosts. At least for some species (e.g. *Vertebrata lanosa* being associated with *Ascophyllum nodosum*), high substrate specificity has been demonstrated (Garbary, 2017).

### 3.2.2 Macroalgal blooming

Macroalgal blooming indicates the demonstrated capacity of a species to produce blooms. This trait had relatively low data coverage of 13% (233 species) on a European level (Figs. 3, 5–7). Notorious examples of blooming species include *Ulva prolifera*, *Cladophora glomerata*, *Caulerpa cylindracea*, and holopelagic *Sargassum* and *Rugulopteryx okamurae*, and events have been often linked to eutrophication (Charlier et al., 2008; Pierucci et al., 2019; Smetacek and Zingone, 2013). The trait, however, shows considerable variation with geographic location. This is exemplified by several non-native species, which bloom in the invaded region while showing non such behaviour in their regions of origin. This variation was incorporated in the database by linking entries for macroalgal blooming to geographic localities.

### 3.2.3 Seasonality

Seasonality had a relatively low data coverage of 14% on a European level (249 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7). Seaweeds with large geographical ranges adapt to local seasonal conditions by adjusting their phenology (Lüning, 1991). It is therefore possible for a species to be present in one season in one part of its range while being absent elsewhere.

### 3.2.4 Vertical space

All types of vertical space (encrusting, turf, sub-canopy, canopy; Table A1) occur and vary among and within orders of the green (Fig. 8), brown (Fig. 9), and red seaweeds (Fig. 10). Vertical space had a moderate coverage of 46% on European level (808 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Morphological body shape diversity of seaweeds. (a) Flabellate and calcified *Padina*, (b) foliose *Ulva*, (c) branched *Asparagopsis*, (d) crustose and calcified *Mesophyllum*, (e) branched *Pelvetia*, (f) siphonous and calcified *Acetabularia*, and (g) branched and siphonous *Codium*. (h) *Chondrus* (left) and *Mastocarpus* (right) (i) erect *Laminaria*, (j) dichotomously branched *Dictyota*, (k) filamentous *Rhizoclonium*, and (l) calcified and articulated *Jania*. Photo credits: (a–d), (f–h), (k–l): Ignacio Bárbara; (e, j): Olivier De Clerck; (i) Cristina Piñeiro-Corbeira.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.2.5 Tolerance to organic pollutants

Some seaweeds have a lower tolerance to turbidity or nutrient concentrations than others (Table A1). For example, *Choristocarpus tenellus* is mainly observed in waters with low nutrient levels and high visibility (oligotrophic, clear water; Table A1), while *Ulva* spp. are mainly observed from waters with mid to high nutrient concentration (mesotrophic, eutrophic; Table A1). Tolerance to organic pollutants was covered for 39% of European accepted seaweeds (678 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).

### 3.2.6 Wave exposure

Some seaweed species are solely known from habitats with low-energy wave forces (sheltered; Table A1) such as *Chaetomorpha adrianii* or from habitats with solely high-energy wave forces (exposed; Table A1) such as *Valonia utricularis*. Other seaweeds can occur in a variety of wave exposures including sheltered semi-exposed and exposed such as the non-native *Sargassum muticum*. Wave exposure had a relatively low coverage of 18% on the European level (315 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Data coverage for green seaweeds. The taxonomic coverage is restricted to marine representatives. The order Charales is included to accommodate a limited number of species that occur in brackish habitats. The left side shows a phylogenetic tree at the ordinal level. Next to the tree the number of species with trait information available in the database is indicated as the total number (no. of species), the percentage relative to the total number of European species (% Europe), and the percentage relative to the total number of global species (% global). The heatmap indicates the percentage of trait coverage relative to the total number of European species per order per trait included in the database. At the bottom of the figure, average species coverage per trait is presented as a percentage of the total number of European (% Europe) and global (% global) species. Oltmannsiellopsid refers to Oltmannsiellopsidales.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.2.7 Zonation

Many species are physiologically adapted to endure the stress of tidal differences and daily changes between desiccation and submersion (e.g. *Pelvetia canaliculata*). Other species will only occur below the low water mark and do not endure such high variation in desiccation, salinity, temperature, or other stressors under normal conditions (e.g. *Alaria escu-lenta*). Zonation had a relatively low data coverage of 18% on a European level (316 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).

## 3.3 Life-cycle-related traits

### 3.3.1 Life cycle

Information on life cycle was available for 95 % of European seaweed species (1660 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7). Many seaweeds have a biphasic or haplodiplontic life cycle in which a diploid sporophytic and a haploid gametophytic life phase al-

ternate. These can have a similar (isomorphic; e.g. *Chondrus crispus*) or distinct (heteromorphic) body shape (e.g. Lam-inariales) (Fig. 2). Haplodiplontic life cycles are the domi-nant type of life cycle in the brown (Fig. 9) and red (Fig. 10) seaweeds. Other seaweeds have a monophasic life cycle that is either diploid (diplontic) or haploid (haplontic) (Fig. 2). Variation in the life cycle has been documented in several species either in the lab (e.g. in reds, Maggs, 1988; in *Ecto-carpus*, Coelho et al., 2012) or in the field (e.g. in *Gracilaria*, Destombe et al., 1989). However, the knowledge about the processes driving this variation (e.g. epigenetic (plastic) or genetic bases) is not known.

### 3.3.2 Asexual reproduction

In many seaweeds, sexual reproduction occurs alongside asexual reproduction (i.e. partial clonality) that does not involve fusion of gametes or meiosis and usually results in
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Data coverage for brown seaweeds (Phaeophyceae). The left side shows a phylogenetic tree at the ordinal level. Next to the tree the number of species with trait information available in the database is indicated as the total number (no. of species), the percentage relative to the total number of European species (% Europe), and the percentage relative to the total number of global species (% global). The heatmap indicates the percentage of trait coverage relative to the total number of European species per order per trait included in the database. At the bottom of the figure, average species coverage per trait is presented as a percentage of the total number of European (% Europe) and global (% global) species.</figcaption></figure>

progeny with an identical genetic constitution to the parent and to each other (Table A1). Asexual reproduction is widely spread in green, brown, and red seaweeds (Figs. 8–10) and can happen through fragmentation, direct development of spores, parthenogenesis, or other mechanisms. Asexual reproduction had a high data coverage of 95% on a European level (1649 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).

persal over longer distances is also possible when the species can for example drift, or the dispersal is mediated by vectors such as boat hulls (Table 1A). Dispersion mode has a moderate data coverage of 80% on the European level (1401 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).

### 3.3.3 Dispersion mode

Seaweed dispersal is heavily influenced by ocean currents and water motion (but in red seaweeds, animal mediated transport of male gametes could be important; Lavaut et al., 2022) and is in most cases limited in spatial scale. But dis-
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Data coverage for red seaweeds (Rhodophyta). The left side shows a phylogenetic tree at the ordinal level. Next to the tree the number of species with trait information available in the database is indicated as the total number (no. of species), the percentage relative to the total number of European species (% Europe), and the percentage relative to the total number of global species (% global). The heatmap indicates the percentage of trait coverage relative to the total number of European species per order per trait included in the database. At the bottom of the figure, average species coverage per trait is presented as a percentage of the total number of European (% Europe) and global (% global) species. Orders with blank bars are not present in European marine waters.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

**Figure 8.** Trait variability for a selected set of traits (asexual reproduction, calcification, gamete type, life cycle, life span, vertical space) for European green seaweeds. The left side shows a phylogenetic tree at the ordinal level. On the right stacked bar plots indicate trait variability as the proportion of species exhibiting a certain trait value by order and by trait.

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

**Figure 9.** Trait variability for a selected set of traits (asexual reproduction, calcification, gamete type, life cycle, life span, vertical space) for European brown seaweeds (Phaeophyceae). The left side shows a phylogenetic tree at the ordinal level. On the right stacked bar plots indicate trait variability as the proportion of species exhibiting a certain trait value by order and by trait. Grey bars indicate missing data.
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 10.** Trait variability for a selected set of traits (asexual reproduction, calcification, gamete type, life cycle, life span, vertical space) for European red seaweeds. The left side shows a phylogenetic tree at the ordinal level. On the right stacked bar plots indicate trait variability as the proportion of species exhibiting a certain trait value by order and by trait. Orders with blank bars are not present in European marine waters, and grey bars indicate missing data.</figcaption></figure>
### 3.3.4 Gamete type

Gamete type varies among and within orders of green and brown seaweeds (Figs. 8, 9). In red seaweeds, gamete type is more conserved: male gamete is unflagellated (spermatia), and fertilisation takes place in the female organ called the carpogonium. This type of reproduction is considered oogamous when information is available. This trait was documented for 95% of the European seaweeds (1661 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).

### 3.3.5 Gametophyte arrangements

In seaweeds, the male and female gametes can be formed on the same or separate thalli (mono- vs. di-); sex determination can happen in both the haploid and diploid life phase depending on the taxon (-oicous vs. -oecious) (Fig. 3, Table A1). For example, in fucoids, sex determination occurs in the diploid-dominant stage, whereas, in all red seaweeds, sex determination occurs in the haploid stage. Gametophyte arrangement was documented for 93% of the European seaweed species (1626 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).

### 3.3.6 Spawning

For the majority of the brown and green seaweeds, fertilisation occurs in the water column, but in red seaweeds, male gametes are not flagellated and fertilisation occurs on the female gametophyte and gives rise to the “third phase” of the life cycle called the carposporophyte. Spawning has been documented for 95% of European species (1658 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).

## 3.4 Life history-related traits

### 3.4.1 Generation time

Of all traits, least information was collected for the trait generation time (Fig. 4b). In seaweeds, generation time can vary from just a few weeks in *Ulva* (Wichard et al., 2015) to multiple decades such as in *Gracilaria* (Engel et al., 2001) or *Ascophyllum* (Åberg, 1992). Generation time was documented for only 7% of the European seaweed (117 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).

### 3.4.2 Life span

Life span varies within and among European green, brown, and red seaweeds (Figs. 8–10). Perennial macroalgae can live up to multiple years such as for several years. Many kelp species such as Laminariales or *Gracilaria gracilis* can live for more than 50 years (Engel et al., 2001); *Ascophyllum nodosum* can live for more than 120 years (Åberg, 1992). In contrast, annuals live only a few months, such as several small filamentous species (e.g. *Chaetomorpha*). At the European level, data coverage was high for life span, 95% (1652 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).

### 3.4.3 Reproductive frequency

Data coverage was limited for reproductive frequency, with data available for only 25% for the European species (427 species) (Figs. 3, 5–7).

## 4 Discussion

AlgaeTraits includes 21 traits and 1742 European seaweed species, and it is structured within a general framework and ontology aiming to describe all marine species (Costello et al., 2015). With a mean coverage of ~60% per trait, this database will be a solid tool for a variety of biological research and related fields, including marine conservation, nature-based solutions, and aquaculture. For example, traits can be used to monitor community and ecosystem changes (McGill et al., 2006; Vélez-Rubio et al., 2021) or to identify conservation priorities (Albouy et al., 2017; Cardeccia et al., 2018; Esmaeili et al., 2022). In addition, they can be incorporated into predictive modelling to assess eco-evolutionary consequences of climate change (Schleuning et al., 2020), can contribute to predicting the invasiveness of species (Nyberg and Wallentinus, 2005; Quell et al., 2021), can be used in research aiming to better understand the driving forces of evolutionary trait history (Heesch et al., 2021) or the mechanisms of community assembly (Weiss and Ray, 2019), and can even help to assess ecosystem service vulnerability (Díaz et al., 2013; Stevenson, 2014).

The AlgaeTraits database complements recent efforts to collect and publicly provide well-structured and organised seaweed trait data. Just as MarLIN (2006) and SeaTrain (2022) we focussed on biologically important traits. But contrary to these other initiatives, AlgaeTraits includes all European seaweed species and presents a different, yet overlapping, set of traits. MarLIN (2006) covers over 40 traits, of which 12 overlap with AlgaeTraits, but it is limited to only 30 seaweed species. SeaTrain (2022) covers around 10 traits, of which 2 traits overlap with AlgaeTraits, and includes 96 seaweed species. As to taxonomic coverage (1742 species) and inclusion of functional important traits as prioritised by Costello et al. (2015), AlgaeTraits is the most extensive seaweed trait database published so far.

In this first version of AlgaeTraits, not all traits are available for all species yet, and the current list of traits is not yet complete. For example, other key eco-evolutionary traits that might be considered to be included in the database are tolerance to light, tolerance to temperature, tolerance to grazing, tolerance to sedimentation, or tolerance to epiphytism. There is currently no possibility to describe parasitic algal life forms in the database, ignoring a relatively diverse group of red algae. Completion and further refining and expanding the database will be an ongoing effort of the AlgaeTraits editor community. AlgaeTraits currently has 30 trained thematic editors who actively update the trait information on a voluntary basis through the online editing inter-
face (https://www.algaetraits.org, lastaccess: 10/09/2022) and
gradually work on the expansion of this European database to
a global database. The AlgaeTraits editorial community will
also need to report to the WoRMS steering committee. As
the database expands, adding new traits or trait values can
be considered under thorough consideration and discussion
with the WoRMS steering committee and data management
team.

For now, traits are included at the species level in Al-
gaeTraits. However, multiple traits can exhibit substantial
intraspecific variation (Kattge et al., 2011). For example,
morphological seaweed traits can differ among populations
depending on underlying genetic patterns (Serisawa et al.,
2003) or depending on environmental conditions such as
wave exposure with rather smaller and more slender indi-
viduals in exposed than sheltered localities (Ruuskanen et
al., 1999; Fowler-Walker et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2022). But
also habitat-preference, life-history (Araújo et al., 2011), or
life-cycle traits can vary intraspecifically. Some seaweeds
reproduce sexually under normal conditions but change to
asexual reproduction under specific environmental condi-
tions (Demes and Graham, 2011; Murúa et al., 2017) or at the
limits of their distribution (i.e. geographic parthenogenesis:
Oppliger et al., 2014; Hoshino et al., 2021). Intraspecific trait
variation is thus caused by both genetic variation and phe-
notypic plasticity and can be a response to improve perfor-
mance under specific environmental biotic or abiotic condi-
tions (Kattge et al., 2011). At the moment, we considered in-
traspecific variation by assigning localities (or life stages) to
the trait values when possible or specifying detailed informa-
tion in the note field. However, complementary approaches
measuring trait information at specimen level (e.g. Mauffrey
et al., 2020; Cappelatti et al., 2019) are useful, especially for
quantitative traits, to fully capture intraspecific trait variabil-
ity and allow more in-depth analysis.

5 Data availability

The data can be accessed from the AlgaeTraits portal,
https://doi.org/10.14284/574 (AlgaeTraits, 2022).

6 Conclusions

We provided a consolidated database of important traits of European seaweeds that is distinct in its completeness and taxonomic coverage. Because the database is standardised and fits within the broader framework of WoRMS that aims to include all taxa described, it serves not only as a significant resource for phycological research focusing on trait-based ecology or evolution, but also for general macro-ecological and macroevolutionary research in general. The database can help to explore ecological questions about relations among traits or help to unravel taxonomic and evolutionary patterns of traits in seaweeds. Because some trait values vary geographically and some traits values were documented at the genus level, the database may not always provide the highest variation at the species level. However, an active thematic editorial community is currently committed to further updating and improving the quality of this European database and expanding it to a global level to facilitate thorough and broad-scale trait-based analysis.
Appendix A

<table><caption>Table A1. Trait definitions as applied in AlgaeTraits.</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait group</th><th>Trait</th><th>Trait value</th><th>Trait child value</th><th>Definition</th><th>Genus or species example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="10">Morphology</td><td>Body shape</td><td>Branched</td><td>–</td><td>Forming main and lateral branches (and branchlets).</td><td>Plumaria</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Capitate</td><td>–</td><td>(1) Enlarged or swollen at tip; (2) gathered into a mass at tip or apex.</td><td>Penicillus</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Crustose</td><td>–</td><td>Forming a thin crust on the substratum, applicable to certain lichens, sponges, and algae (Lawrence, 2005).</td><td>Hydrolithon</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Cushion-like</td><td>–</td><td>Approximating the shape of a cushion (Womersley, 1987).</td><td>Cladophoropsis membranacea</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Discoid</td><td>–</td><td>(1) Flat and circular; (2) disc-shaped (Lawrence, 2005).</td><td>Ulvella, Scytosiphon lomentaria (sporophyte)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Erect</td><td>–</td><td>Upright.</td><td>Cystoseira</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Filamentous</td><td>–</td><td>Existing out of a branched or unbranched row of cells joined end to end (Womersley, 1987).</td><td>Antithamnionella</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Filiform</td><td>–</td><td>Resembling a filament.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Flabellate</td><td>–</td><td>Fan-shaped, thallus usually expanding upward from a narrow base.</td><td>Flabellia</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Foliose</td><td>–</td><td>Leaf-like (Womersley, 1987).</td><td>Palmaria, Halymenia</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Mucilaginous</td><td>–</td><td>Consisting of a slippery and slimy texture (Maggs and Hommersand, 1993)</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Pinnate</td><td>–</td><td>With laterals or branches arranged along each side of an axis or branch (Womersley, 1987).</td><td>Haliptilon</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Prostrate</td><td>–</td><td>Trailing on the ground or lying closely along a surface (Lawrence, 2005).</td><td>Parviphycus</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Saccate</td><td>–</td><td>Inflated, or sac-like (Womersley, 1987).</td><td>Colpomenia</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Spheric</td><td>–</td><td>Approximating the shape of a sphere (Womersley, 1987).</td><td>Valonia</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Stoloniferous</td><td>–</td><td>Forming a prostrate axis, lying on or in the substrate, from which erect branches arise (Womersley, 1984).</td><td>Caulerpa</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Tubular</td><td>–</td><td>In the form of a tube, having tubes, consisting of tubes (Lawrence, 2005).</td><td>Chorda filum</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table A1. Continued.**</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait group</th><th>Trait</th><th>Trait value</th><th>Trait child value</th><th>Definition</th><th>Genus or species example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td><td>So far it has not been reported in the literature what the body shape (thallus) is for this taxon.</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Body size</td><td>[numerical value]</td><td>–</td><td>A measurement of the size of the organism. The measurement used to express body size varies within taxonomic groups. For example, some disciplines measure diameter, others carapace length, total body length or wingspan. Also, body size can vary with gender and life stage.</td><td>Caulerpa prolifera: 25 cm maximum thallus length</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Calcification</td><td>Calcified articulated</td><td>–</td><td>Algal thallus that is encrusted or impregnated with lime with non-calcified joints rendering the thallus a segmented nature.</td><td>Halimeda, Corallina</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Calcified non-articulated</td><td>–</td><td>Algal thallus that is encrusted or impregnated with lime lacking non-calcified joints.</td><td>Hydrolithon</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Non-calcified</td><td>–</td><td>Algal thallus not encrusted or impregnated with lime.</td><td>Cladophora</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td><td>So far it has not been reported in the literature whether the thallus is calcified.</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cytomorphology</td><td>Unicellular</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>Having only one cell or consisting of one cell.</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Unicellular</td><td>Siphonous</td><td>–</td><td>An algal growth form that is filamentous, tubular, multinucleate, and with a few cross-walls, if any (Brodie et al., 2007).</td><td>Acetabularia, Bryopsis, Caulerpa, Codium</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Non-unicellular</td><td>Having more than one cell or consisting of more than one cell (adapted from Lawrence, 2005).</td><td>–</td><td>Furcellaria</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Non-unicellular</td><td>Coenocytic</td><td>–</td><td>With cells being multinucleate.</td><td>Cladophora, Dictyosphaeria, Valonia</td></tr><tr><td>Ecology</td><td>Distribution*</td><td>–</td><td>Species distributions documented as georegions. See https://www.marineregions.org (last access: 26 August 2022) for the full list of georegions.</td><td>–</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Environmental position</td><td>Endolithic</td><td>–</td><td>Growing within a rock or other hard inorganic or organic substrate (Lincoln et al., 1998).</td><td>Porphyra (Conchocelis Ostreobium) (Con-stage),</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Endophytic</td><td>–</td><td>Living within a plant tissue or macroalgal thallus and not deriving nourishment from it.</td><td>Callocolax</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table A1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait group</th><th>Trait</th><th>Trait value</th><th>Trait value</th><th>child</th><th>Definition</th><th>Genus or species example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Endozoic</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Living within or passing through the body of an animal and not deriving nourishment from it.</td><td>Callocolax</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Epilithic</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Growing on rocks or other hard inorganic or organic substrata (Lincoln et al., 1998).</td><td>Acanthophora</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Epiphytic</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Living on the surface of a plant or alga and not deriving nourishment from it.</td><td>Vertebrata lanosa</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Epipsammic</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Growing in or on sand or other soft inorganic or organic substratum</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Epizoic</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Living attached to the body of an animal used for a non-parasitic organism that lives attached to the outer surface of an animal.</td><td>Polysiphonia carettia</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unattached</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Growing without attachment to any type of substrate.</td><td>Ulva</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Environment*</td><td>Marine</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>Occurring at salinities higher than 30 ppt</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Brackish</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>Occurring at a salinity range of 0.5–30 ppt</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Freshwater</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>Occurring at a salinity range of 0–0.5 ppt</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Terrestrial</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>Occurring on land</td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Macroalgal blooming</td><td>Yes</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>The species has the potential to go through episodes of intense thallus growth, reproduction, and mass proliferation under specific environmental conditions such as high nutrient and temperature conditions</td><td>Rugulopteryx okamurae, Ulva spp.</td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>The species does not have the obvious potential to go through episodes of intense growth and mass proliferation of the thallus under specific environmental conditions such as high nutrient and temperature conditions</td><td>Jania adhaerens</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Seasonality</td><td>Spring</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>The organism can be observed in spring.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Summer</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>The organism can be observed in summer.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Autumn</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>The organism can be observed in autumn.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Winter</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>The organism can be observed in winter.</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table A1. Continued.**</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait group</th><th>Trait</th><th>Trait value</th><th>Trait value</th><th>child</th><th>Definition</th><th>Genus or species example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Seasonality not reported in the literature.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Vertical space</td><td></td><td>Canopy</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Vegetation of macroalgae or plants partially blocking light penetration, thereby creating a shaded understorey.</td><td>Fucus, Laminaria, Saccorhiza</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Encrusting</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>With a crustose growth form</td><td>Hydrolithon</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Sub-canopy</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Forming a secondary cover, usually of 20 cm height maximum</td><td>Dictyota, Halimeda</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Turf</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Vegetation dominated by macroalgae with limited vertical height, usually &lt; 5 cm height</td><td>Gelidium pusillum</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="8">Tolerance to organic pollutants</td><td></td><td>Clear waters</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Occurring in waters where visibility is most of the time &gt; 10 m.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Eutrophic waters</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Occurring in waters with high primary productivity; pertaining to waters rich in nutrients.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Mesotrophic waters</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Occurring in waters with intermediate levels of primary productivity; pertaining to waters having intermediate levels of the nutrients.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Moderately turbid waters</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Occurring in waters where visibility is most of the time &gt; 1 and &lt; 10 m.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Oligotrophic waters</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Pertaining to waters with low levels of the nutrients resulting in low primary net productivity.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Turbid waters</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Occurring in waters where visibility is most of the time &lt; 1 m</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Water with variable turbidity</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Occurring in waters where turbidity varies periodically.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Exposed</td><td>Exposed</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Occurring in habitats that are subject to high-energy wave forces.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Exposed</td><td>High-energy rock</td><td></td><td>Occurring on rocky substrate subject to high-energy wave forces.</td><td>Chondrus crispus</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Features of rock</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Specific characteristics of rocky substrate such as pools, caves, overhangs, surge gulleys, artificial hard substrata.</td><td>Pylaiella littoralis</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table A1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait group</th><th>Trait</th><th>Trait value</th><th>Trait child value</th><th>Definition</th><th>Genus or species example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Semi-exposed</td><td>–</td><td>Occurring in habitats that are subject to moderate energy wave forces.</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Semi-exposed</td><td>Moderate energy rock</td><td>Occurring on rocky substrate subject to moderate energy wave forces.</td><td>Himanthalia elongata</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Sheltered</td><td>–</td><td>Occurring in habitats that are subject to low-energy wave forces.</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Sheltered</td><td>Coarse sediments</td><td>Occurring on coarse sediments such as gravel, pebbles, shingles, and cobbles occurring at sheltered locations.</td><td>Saccharina latissima</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Sheltered</td><td>Low-energy rock</td><td>Occurring on rocky substrate subject to low-energy wave forces.</td><td>Polysiphonia elongata</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Sheltered</td><td>Macrophyte-dominated sediments</td><td>Sediments with a high cover of macroalgae or seagrasses.</td><td>Laurencia caspica</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Sheltered</td><td>Mud-dominated sediments</td><td>Sediments composed of a mixture of clay (&lt; 2 µm) and silt (4–62 µm) typically deposited in a low-energy environment.</td><td>Chaetomorpha linum</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Sheltered</td><td>Sand-dominated sediments</td><td>Sediments composed of a mixture of sand particles (0.074–4.75 mm) typically deposited in a low-energy environment.</td><td>Codium fragile</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td><td>Not been reported in the literature in what type of wave exposure the species occurs.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Zonation</td><td>Intertidal</td><td>–</td><td>The part of the shore between high and low tide.</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Littoral zone</td><td>–</td><td>The part of the shore covering the intertidal and the splash zone, with the upper limit marked by the top of the lichen zone and the lower limit marked by the top of the laminarian kelp zone.</td><td>Ascophyllum nodosum</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Subtidal</td><td>–</td><td>The part of the shore continuously covered by water, below the intertidal zone.</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Lower intertidal zone</td><td>–</td><td>The part of the intertidal zone that supports scattered kelp plants.</td><td>Bryopsis plumosa</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table A1. Continued.**</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait group</th><th>Trait</th><th>Trait value</th><th>Trait child value</th><th>Definition</th><th>Genus or species example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Upper circalittoral zone</td><td>Dominated by animals with sparse foliose algae except where grazed. The part of the circalittoral subzone on hard substrata distinguished by the presence of scattered foliose algae amongst the dominating animals; its lower limit is the maximum limit of depth for foliose algae</td><td>Corallina officinalis</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Upper infralittoral zone</td><td>The region of the sublittoral which extends from the lower limit of the infralittoral to the maximum depth at which photosynthesis is still possible.</td><td>Gracilaria gracilis</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="10">Life cycle</td><td rowspan="10">Life cycle</td><td>Diplontic</td><td>–</td><td>Having a life cycle in which the direct products of meiosis act as gametes; only the gametes are haploid (Lincoln et al., 1998).</td><td>Sargassum</td></tr><tr><td>Haplodiplontic</td><td>–</td><td>Having a life cycle with alternating free-living gametophyte and sporophyte phases (Womersley, 1987).</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Haplodiplontic</td><td>Heteromorphic</td><td>Organisms with the gametophyte and sporophyte of different morphology and size (Womersley, 1987).</td><td>Laminaria ochroleuca</td></tr><tr><td>Haplodiplontic</td><td>Isomorphic</td><td>Organisms with the gametophyte and sporophyte of similar morphology and size (Womersley, 1987).</td><td>Dictyota dichotoma</td></tr><tr><td>Haplodiplontic</td><td>Not applicable</td><td>It is not applicable whether this taxon is heteromorphic or isomorphic.</td><td>Parvocaulis</td></tr><tr><td>Haplodiplontic</td><td>Unknown</td><td>According to the literature it is unknown whether this organism is heteromorphic or isomorphic.</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Haplodiplontic</td><td>Unreported</td><td>So far it has not been reported in the literature whether this taxon is heteromorphic or isomorphic.</td><td>Metapeyssonnelia</td></tr><tr><td>Haplontic</td><td>–</td><td>Having a life cycle in which meiosis occurs in the zygote to produce the haploid phase; only the zygote is diploid (Lincoln et al., 1998).</td><td>Tolypella</td></tr><tr><td>Unknown</td><td>–</td><td>According to the literature it is unknown what life cycle this organism has.</td><td>Epicladia</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table A1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait group</th><th>Trait</th><th>Trait value</th><th>Trait child value</th><th>Definition</th><th>Genus or species example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td><td>So far it has not been reported in the literature what life cycle this taxon has.</td><td><i>Hecatonema</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Asexual reproduction</td><td>Asexual reproduction</td><td>–</td><td>Reproduction which does not involve fusion of gametes or meiosis and usually results in progeny with an identical genetic constitution to the parent and to each other. Asexual reproduction may amongst others occur by binary fission, budding, asexual spore formation or vegetative propagation.</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Asexual reproduction</td><td>Asexual reproduction by an unknown mechanism</td><td>Asexual reproduction is detected, but the underpinning mechanism is unknown.</td><td><i>Bryopsis hypnoides</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Asexual reproduction</td><td>Asexual reproduction by direct development of spores</td><td>Reproduction by asexual spores resulting in a new individual of the same ploidy (exospore, endospore, monospore, bispore, paraspore, zoospore, aplanospore, autospore).</td><td><i>Corallina officinalis</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Asexual reproduction</td><td>Asexual reproduction by fragmentation</td><td>Type of asexual reproduction in which the organism breaks up into smaller pieces, each of which can develop into a new individual, as in some algae (Lawrence, 2005).</td><td><i>Caulerpa</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Asexual reproduction</td><td>Asexual reproduction by parthenogenesis</td><td>Direct development of a new individual from an unfused gamete.</td><td><i>Ulva prolifera</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Asexual reproduction</td><td>Asexual reproduction by vegetative propagules</td><td>Asexual reproduction by development of a new individual from a vegetative propagule.</td><td><i>Prasiola crispa</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>No asexual reproduction</td><td>–</td><td>The taxon does not reproduce asexually, which is reproduction which does not involve formation and fusion of gametes and results in progeny with an identical genetic constitution to the parent and to each other. Reproduction may occur by binary fission, budding, asexual spore formation or vegetative propagation. In asexual division in eukaryotic organisms, all cell divisions are by mitosis.</td><td><i>Acanthophora</i></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table A1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait group</th><th>Trait</th><th>Trait value</th><th>Trait value</th><th>child</th><th>Definition</th><th>Genus or species example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unknown</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>According to the literature it is unknown whether this organism reproduces asexually.</td><td><i>Tolypella</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Dispersion mode</td><td>Aplanospores</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>A non-motile, asexual spore.</td><td><i>Cymopolia</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Monospores</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>An undivided spore.</td><td><i>Monosporus</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Motile spores</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Spores are flagellate and can therefore disperse.</td><td><i>Ectocarpus</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>One motile gamete</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Only the male gamete is flagellate and can therefore disperse.</td><td><i>Chondracanthus</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Two motile gametes</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Both male and female gametes are flagellate and can therefore disperse.</td><td><i>Colpomenia, Scytosiphon</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Vegetative fragmentation</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Type of asexual reproduction in which the organism breaks up into smaller pieces, each of which can develop into a new individual.</td><td><i>Chaetomorpha</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Vegetative fragmentation</td><td>Thallus fragmentation and drift</td><td></td><td>A part of the thallus can be lost and drift.</td><td><i>Gracilaria</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Vegetative propagation</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Vegetative reproduction by propagules that can also be used as a means of dispersal.</td><td><i>Asparagopsis</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Presence of buoyancy structures</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Individuals exhibit gas-filled structures that favour their floating.</td><td><i>Sargassum</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Species cultivated or sold in aquaria trade</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>The species is cultivated or sold in aquaria trade.</td><td><i>Caulerpa taxifolia</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Species growing on artificial substrate</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>The species is growing on artificial substrate such as harbour walls, boat hulls, piers, buoys.</td><td><i>Undaria pinnatifida</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unknown</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>According to the literature it is unknown which dispersion mode this organism has.</td><td><i>Bornetia</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>So far it has not been reported in the literature which dispersion mode this taxon has.</td><td><i>Herponema</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Gamete type</td><td>Anisogamous</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Having gametes of dissimilar size, shape, or behaviour (Lincoln et al., 1998).</td><td><i>Scytosiphon</i></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table A1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait group</th><th>Trait</th><th>Trait value</th><th>Trait value</th><th>child</th><th>Definition</th><th>Genus or species example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Isogamous</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Having gametes that are similar in size, shape and behaviour; having gametes (isogametes) not differentiated into male and female (Lincoln et al., 1998).</td><td>Ectocarpus</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Oogamous</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Having a reproduction involving a large, non-motile female gamete (egg cell) and a small, motile male gamete (sperm cell or equivalent), except for red algae in which the male gamete is also non-motile (Womersley, 1987).</td><td>Cryptonemia, Dictyota, Fucus</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Not applicable</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>The attribute gamete type is not applicable for this taxon.</td><td>Halothrix</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unknown</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>According to the literature it is unknown which gamete type this organism has.</td><td>Fosliea</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>So far it has not been reported in the literature what the gamete type is for this taxon.</td><td>Rosenvingea</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Gametophyte arrangement</td><td>Dioecious</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>When male and female reproductive structures are formed on the separate individual and the sex is determined in diploid phase.</td><td>Alaria esculenta</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Dioicous</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>When male and female reproductive structures are formed on the separate individual and the sex is determined in haploid phase (Beukeboom and Perrin, 2014).</td><td>Dasya elongata</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Mixed</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>With individuals bearing only male or female reproductive structures and individuals bearing both male and female reproductive structures in one species.</td><td>Griffithsia</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Monoecious</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>When male and female reproductive structures are formed on same individuals and the sex is determined in diploid phase.</td><td>Fucus distichus</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Monoicous</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>When male and female reproductive structures are formed on same individuals and the sex is determined in haploid phase.</td><td>Hydrolithon</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Not applicable</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>The attribute gametophyte arrangement is not applicable for this taxon.</td><td>Pedobesia</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unknown</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>According to the literature it is unknown which gametophyte arrangement this organism has.</td><td>Stilopsis</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table A1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait group</th><th>Trait</th><th>Trait value</th><th>Trait value</th><th>child</th><th>Definition</th><th>Genus or species example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>So far it has not been reported in the literature what the gametophyte arrangement is for this taxon.</td><td>Chaetosiphon</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Spawning</td><td></td><td>Fertilisation in the water column</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Fertilisation with gametes released in the water column.</td><td>Batophora</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Fertilisation on the female gametophyte</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Female gamete retained on the female gametophyte (e.g. Rhodophyta).</td><td>Atractophora hypnoides</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Not applicable</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>The attribute spawning is not applicable for this taxon.</td><td>Porphyridium purpureum</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Unknown</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>According to the literature it is unknown which spawning mechanism this organism has.</td><td>Chordaria</td></tr><tr><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>So far it has not been reported in the literature whether there is spawning for this taxon.</td><td>Spongonema</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Life history</td><td>Generation time</td><td>1 to 3 months</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Life cycle completed in 1 to 3 months in the lab.</td><td>Ulva</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>3 to 12 months</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Life cycle completed in 3 to 12 months in the lab.</td><td>Cystoseira barbata</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1 to 3 years</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>Life cycle completed in 1 to 3 years in the lab.</td><td>Saccharina latissima</td></tr><tr><td>More than 3 years</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>Life cycle completed in more than 3 years in the lab.</td><td>Furcellaria lumbricalis</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Life span</td><td>Annual</td><td>–</td><td></td><td></td><td>(1) Applicable to structures or growth features that are marked off or completed yearly; (2) living for a year only; (3) completing life cycle in a year from germination; (4) plant that completes its life cycle in a year. (Lawrence, 2005). Thallus which survives only one growing season (less than 1 year) (Womersley, 1987).</td><td>Acrosymphyton purpuriferum</td></tr><tr><td>Annual</td><td>Ephemeral</td><td></td><td></td><td>(1) Short-lived; (2) taking place once only, applicable to plant movements as expanding buds; (3) completing life cycle within a brief period; (4) a short-lived plant or animal species (Lawrence, 2005). Thallus which survives for only a few weeks (less than 1 month) (Womersley, 1987).</td><td>Osmundea hybrida</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table A1. Continued.**</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait group</th><th>Trait</th><th>Trait value</th><th>Trait value child</th><th>Definition</th><th>Genus or species example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Perennial</td><td>–</td><td>Plant which persists for several years (Lawrence, 2005).</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Perennial</td><td>Long perennial</td><td>Thallus or part thereof with a lifespan exceeding 3 years (more than 3 years)</td><td><i>Cystoseira barbata</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Perennial</td><td>Short perennial</td><td>Thallus or part thereof with a lifespan exceeding 1 year but under 3 years.</td><td><i>Undaria pinnatifida</i></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Unreported</td><td>–</td><td>So far it has not been reported in the literature which life span this organism has.</td><td><i>Spatoglossum</i></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Reproductive frequency</td><td>Throughout the year</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>Fertile individuals observed throughout the year.</td><td><i>Codium fragile</i></td></tr><tr><td>One long period a year</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>A unique fertility period lasting more than 1 month.</td><td><i>Pelvetia canaliculata</i></td></tr><tr><td>One short period a year</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>A unique fertility period lasting less than 1 month.</td><td><i>Desmarestia viridis</i></td></tr><tr><td>Several long periods a year</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>Several distinct fertility periods lasting more than 1 month each.</td><td><i>Ceramium virgatum</i></td></tr><tr><td>Several short periods a year</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>Several distinct fertility periods lasting less than 1 month each.</td><td><i>Pyropia elongata</i></td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote>* Not uploaded as traits or attributes in the Aphia database but as distributions or environmental flags.</footnote>
Appendix B

<table><caption>Table B1. Sources used in the database, ordered from most to least used.</caption><thead><tr><th>Type</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Bunker, F., Brodie, J. A., Maggs, C. A., & Bunker, A. R. (2017). Sea-weeds of Britain and Ireland. Princeton University Press.</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Blanfuné, Aurélie. Institut Méditerranéen d'Océanologie. aurelie.blanfune-thibaut@mio.osupytheas.fr; Boudouresque, Charles-François. Institut Méditerranéen d'Océanologie. charles.boudouresque@mio.osupytheas.fr; Thibaut, Thierry. Institut Méditerranéen d'Océanologie. thierry.thibaut@mio.osupytheas.fr; Verlaque, Marc. Institut Méditerranéen d'Océanologie. marc.verlaque@mio.osupytheas.fr</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Rueness, Jan. University of Oslo. jan.rueness@ibv.uio.no</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Rodriguez-Prieto, C.; Ballesteros, E.; Boisset, F.; Afonso-Carrillo, J. (2013). Guía de las macroalgas y fanerógamas marinas del Mediterráneo occidental. Ediciones Omega. S.A., Barcelona.</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Krueger-Hadfield, Stacy A. University of Alabama at Birmingham. sakh@uab.edu</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Peña, Viviana. Universidad A Coruña. vpena@udc.es</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Criado, Ignacio Bárbara. Universidad A Coruña. barbara@udc.es</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Piñeiro-Corbeira, Cristina. Universidad A Coruña. c.pcorbeira@udc.es</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Guiry, M.D. & Guiry, G.M. (2022). AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. searched on YYYY-MM-DD.</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Le Gall, Line. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle. legall@mnhn.fr</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Kersen, Priit. Agriculture and Food Board. priit.kersen@gmail.com</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Leliaert, Frederik. frederik.leliaert@meisebotanicgarden.be</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Díaz-Tapia, Pilar. Universidad A Coruña. pdiaz@udc.es</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Sjøtun, Inga Kjersti. University of Bergen. Kjersti.Sjotun@bio.uib.no</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Brodie, J.; Maggs, C. A.; John, D. M. (2007). Green Seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. British Phycological Society.</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Smale, Dan. Marine Biological Association. dansma@MBA.ac.uk</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Maggs, C. A.; Hommersand, M. H. (1993). Seaweeds of the British Isles Volume 1 Rhodophyta Part 3A Ceramiales. British Museum (Natural History.</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>de Reviers, Bruno. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle. reviers@mnhn.fr</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Vergés, Alba. Universitat de Girona. alba.verges@udg.edu</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>De Clerck, Olivier. Olivier.declerck@ugent.be</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table B1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><th>Type</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Dixon, P. S. I. L. M. (1977). Seaweeds of the British Islands, vol. 1, Rhodophyta. British Museum, London.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Fletcher, R. L. (1987). Seaweeds of the British Isles: Volume 3. Part 1 Fucophyceae (Phaeophyceae). Natural History Museum: London. ISBN 0-11-310003-5. 359 pp.</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Rindi, Fabio. Università Politecnica delle Marche. f.rindi@univpm.it</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Peters, Akira. Station Biologique de Roscoff. akirapeters@gmail.com</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Destombe, Christophe. Station Biologique de Roscoff. destombe@sb-roscoff.fr; Valero, Myriam. Station Biologique de Roscoff. valero@sb-roscoff.fr</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Irvine, L.M. (1983). Seaweeds of the British Isles. Vol. 1: Rhodophyta. Part 2A: Cryptonemiales (sensu stricto) Palmariales, Rhodymeniales. British Museum (Natural History) London, p. 115 pp.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Cormaci, M.; Furnari, G.; Catra, M.; Alongi, G.; Giaccone, G. (2012). Flora marina bentonica del Mediterraneo: Phaeophyceae. Bollettino dell'Accademia Gioenia. 45: 1-508.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Womersley, H. B. S. (1987). The marine benthic flora of southern Australia. Part II. Adelaide: South Australian Government Printing Division. Adelaide: South Australian Government Printing Division, pp. 481, 169 figs, 1 table, 8 plates, 4 maps.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Bartsch, Inka. Alfred-Wegener-Institute. inka.bartsch@awi.de; Herbst, Anne. University Rostock. anne.herbst2@uni-rostock.de; Karez, Rolf. State Agency for Agriculture. Environment and Rural Areas. Rolf.Karez@llur.landsh.de; Kuhlenkamp, Ralph. Phycomarin. ralph.kuhlenkamp@phycomarin.de; Schubert, Hendrik. University Rostock. hendrik.schubert@uni-rostock.de</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Brodie, J. A. I. L. M. (2003). Seaweeds of the British Isles. Vol. 1: Rhodophyta. Part 3B: Bangiophycidae. Intercept Ltd, Hampshire SP10 1YG, United Kingdom.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Irvine, L.M.; Chamberlain, Y.M. (1994). Seaweeds of the British Isles: Rhodophyta, Part 2B. Corallinales, Hildenbrandiales. Seaweeds of the British Isles, 1. Natural History Museum: London. ISBN 0-11-310016-7. 276 pp. Part of: Seaweeds of the British Isles. ISSN 8769-8522</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Athanasiadis, A. (1996). Morphology and classification of the Ceramioideae (Rhodophyta) based on phylogenetic principles. Opera Botanica, 128, 216 pp.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Womersley, H. B. S. (1994). The marine benthic flora of southern Australia - Rhodophyta - Part III A: Bangiophyceae and Florideophyceae (Acrochaetiales, Nemaliales, Gelidiales, Hildenbrandiales and Gignartinales sensu lato). Australian biological resources study, Canberra.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Carpenter, K. E.; Niem, V. H. (1998). The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific. Volume 1. Seaweeds, corals, bivalves and gastropods. FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. FAO: Rome. ISBN 92-5-104051-6. XIV, 686 pp.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table B1. Continued.**</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Womersley, H. B. S. (1996). The marine benthic flora of southern Australia - Rhodophyta - Part III B. In: Flora of Australia, supplementary series, number 5. Australian biological resources study Canberra, p. 392 pp.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Barcelo Marti, M.; Gallardo Garcia, T.; Gomez Garreta, A.; Perez Ruzafa, I.; Ribera Siguan, M.; Rull Luch, J. (2001). Flora Phycologica Iberica, vol 1: Fucales. Universidad de Murcia.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Taylor, W. R. (1985). Marine algae of the eastern tropical and sub-tropical coasts of the Americas. The University of Michigan press, Michigan.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Abbott, I. A. (1999). Marine red algae of the Hawaiian Islands. Bishop Museum Press, Hawaii, Honolulu.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Burrows, E.M. (1991). Seaweeds of the British Islands, vol. 2 Chlorophyta. Natural History Museum Publications London, p. 238 pp.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Womersley, H. B. S. (2003). The marine benthic flora of southern Australia - Rhodophyta - Part III D (Ceramiales, Delesseriaceae, Sarcomeniaceae, Rhodomelaceae). In: Flora of Australia, supplementary series, number 18. Australian biological resources study and the State Herbarium of South Australia Canberra, pp. 533 pp., ill.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Stegenga, H.; Anderson, R. J.; Bolton, J. J. (2000). Notes on Ceramiaceae (Rhodophyta) from the eastern Cape Province, South Africa. III. New records from the Tsitsikamma coastal park, with the description of <i>Scageliopsis tsitsikammae</i>. Blumea. 45, 485-494.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Wang, W. J.; Zhu, H. Y.; Xu, P.; Xu, J. R.; Lin, X. Z.; Huang, C. K. (2008). Characterization of the life history of <i>Bangia fuscopurpurea</i> (Bangiaceae, Rhodophyta) in connection with its cultivation in China. Aquaculture. 278, 101-109.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Womersley, H.B.S. (1984). The marine benthic flora of southern Australia. Part I: Chlorophyta. Woolman, Government Printer, South Australia, Adelaide.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Womersley, H.B.S. (1998). The marine benthic flora of Southern Australia. Rhodophyta. Part III C: Rhodophyceae, Ceramiaceae, Dasycladeae. State Herbarium, South Australia.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Schnetter, R.; Brück, B.; Gerke, K.; Seibold, G. (1990). Notes on heterokaryotic life cycle phases in some Dasycladales and Bryopsidales (Chlorophyta). In: Cell Walls and Surfaces, Reproduction, Photosynthesis. Springer, pp. 124-133.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Díaz-Tapia, P.; Bárbara, I. (2013). Seaweeds from sand-covered rocks of the Atlantic Iberian Peninsula. Part 1. The Rhodomelaceae. (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Cryptogamie Algologie. 34(4): 325-422.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Van Reine, W. P. (1982). A taxonomic revision of the European Sphacelariaceae:(Sphacelariales, Phaeophyceae). Brill Archive.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Coppejans, E. (1995). Flore algologique des côtes du Nord de la France et de la Belgique. In: Scripta botanica Belgica, p. 454.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table B1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><th>Type</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Harper, J. T.; Saunders, G. W. (2002). A re-classification of the Acrochaetiales based on molecular and morphological data, and establishment of the Colaconematales ord. nov. (Florideophyceae, Rhodophyta). European Journal of Phycology. 37(3): 463-476.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>South, G. R.; Hooper, R. G.; Irvine, L. M. (1972). The life history of Turnerella pennyi (Harv.) Schmitz. Brit Phycol J. 7, 221-233.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Denizot, M. (1968). Les algues floridees encroutantes (a l'excursion des Corallinacees). Laboratoire Cryptogamie, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 310 pp.</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Vranken, Sofie. Ghent University. sofiemvranken@gmail.com</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>De Clerck, O.; Anderson, R. J.; Bolton, J. J.; Robertson-Andersson, D. (2002). <i>Schimmelmannia elegans</i> (Gloiosiphoniaceae, Rhodophyta): South Africa's first introduced seaweed?. Phycologia. 41(2): 184-190.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Maggs, C. A.; Ward, B. A. (1996). The genus <i>Pikea</i> (Dumontiaceae, Rhodophyta) in England and the North Pacific: comparative morphological, life history, and molecular studies. J Phycol. 32, 176-193.</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Robuchon, Marine. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, marine robuchon@mnhn.fr</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kraft, G. T. (2007). Algae of Australia: Marine Benthic Algae of Lord Howe Island and the Southern Great Barrier Reef, 1: Green Algae. ABRS-CSIRO Publishing, Canberra Melbourne. [i-iv], v-vi, 1-347.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Leliaert, F.; Coppejans, E. (2007). Morphological re-assessment of the <i>Boodlea composita</i>-<i>Phyllodictyon anastomosans</i> species complex (Siphonocladales: Chlorophyta). Australian Systematic Botany. 20, 161-185.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Edelstein, T. (1970). The life history of <i>Gloiosiphonia capillaris</i> (Hudson) Carmichael. Phycologia. 9, 55-59.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Peters, A. F.; Novaczek, I.; Müller, D. G.; Mclachlan, J. (1987). Culture studies on reproduction of <i>Sphaerotrichia divaricata</i> (Chordariales, Phaeophyceae). Phycologia. 26, 457-466.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Hillis-Colinvaux, L. (1980). Ecology and taxonomy of <i>Halimeda</i>: Primary producer of coral reefs. Advances in Marine Biology Volume 17. 1-327.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Vroom, P. S.; Smith, C. M.; Coyer, J. A.; Walters, L. J.; Hunter, C. L.; Beach, K. S. et al. (2003). Field biology of <i>Halimeda tuna</i> (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta) across a depth gradient: comparative growth, survivorship, recruitment, and reproduction. Hydrobiologia. 501, 149-166.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Peters, A. (1998). Ribosomal DNA sequences support taxonomic separation of the two species of <i>Chorda</i>: reinstatement of <i>Halosiphon tomentosus</i> (Lyngbye) Jaasund (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales). Eur. J. Phycol. 33, 65-71.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table B1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Schneider, C. W. S. J. S. (1991). Seaweeds of the southeastern United States. Duke University Press, Durham, London.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kim, M. S.; Lee, I. K. (1999). <i>Neosiphonia flavimarina</i> gen. et sp. nov. with a taxonomic reassessment of the genus <i>Polysiphonia</i> (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Phycol Res. 271-281.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Maggs, C. A. (1989). <i>Erythrodermis allenii</i> Batters in the life history of <i>Phyllophora traillii</i> Holmes ex Batters (Phyllophoraceae, Rhodophyta). Phycologia. 28, 305-317.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Peña, V.; Bárbara, I. (2010). New records of crustose seaweeds associated with subtidal maerl beds and gravel bottoms in. Galicia (NW Spain). Bot Mar. 53, 41-61.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Littler, D. S. L. M. M. (2000). Caribbean reef plants. Offshore Graphics, Inc. Washington.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Sanson, M.; Martin, M. J.; Reyes, J. (2006). Vegetative and reproductive morphology of <i>Cladosiphon contortus</i>, <i>C. occidentalis</i> and <i>C. cymodoceae</i> sp. nov. (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae) from the Canary Islands. Phycologia. 45, 529-545.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Saunders, G. W.; Lane, C. E.; Schneider, C. W.; Kraft, G. T. (2006). Unraveling the <i>Asteromenia peltata</i> species complex with clarification of the genera <i>Halichrysis</i> and <i>Drouetia</i> (Rhodymeniaceae, Rhodophyta). Botany. 84, 1581-1607.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Breeman, A. M.; Ten Hoopen, A. (1981). Ecology and distribution of the subtidal red alga <i>Acrosymphyton purpuriferum</i> (J. AG.) Sjöst. (Rhodophyceae, Cryptonemiales). Aquatic Botany. 11: 143-166.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Draisma, S. G.; Prud'homme Van Reine, W. F.; Kawai, H. (2010). A revised classification of the Sphacelariales (Phaeophyceae) inferred from a <i>psbC</i> and <i>rbcL</i> based phylogeny. Eur. J. Phycol. 45, 308-326.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>McCarthy, P.M., Huisman, J. & Kraft, G.T. (2006). Algae of Australia: Nemaliales. Australian Government - SCIRO publishing, Canberra.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Schneider, C. W.; Searles, R. B. (1997). Notes on the marine algae of the Bermudas. 2. Some Rhodophyta, including <i>Polysiphonia ton-gatensis</i> and a discussion of the Herposiphonia secunda/tenella complex. Cryptogamia, algol. 2, 187-210.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kawai, H.; Sasaki, H. (2004). Morphology, life history, and molecular phylogeny of <i>Stschapovia flagellaris</i> (Tilopteridales, Phaeophyceae) and the erection of the Stschapoviaceae fam. nov. Journal of Phycology. 40(6): 1156-1169.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Breeman, A. M. (1979). The caryological phases in the life history of <i>Acrosymphyton purpuriferum</i> (J. Ag.) Sjöst. (Rhodophyceae, Cryptonemiales). Phycologia. 18(2): 146-148.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Wilce, R. T. (1969). <i>Papenfussiella callitricha</i>: new observations on a little-known endemic brown alga from southwest Greenland. J Phycol. 5, 173-180.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Bartsch, I.; Wiencke, C.; Bischof, K.; Buchholz, C. M.; Buck, B. H.; Eggert, A. (2008). The genus <i>Laminaria sensu lato</i>: recent insights and developments. Eur. J. Phycol. 43, 1-86.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Maggs, C. A.; Pueschel, C. M. (1989). Morphology and development of <i>Ahnfeltia plicata</i> (Rhodophyta): proposal of Ahnfeltiales ord. nov. J Phycol. 25, 333-351.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table B1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>De Jong, Y. S. D. M.; Prud'homme van Reine, W. F.; Lokhorst, G. M. (1997). Studies on Dasyaceae. II. A revision of the genera <i>Eupogodon</i> and <i>Dipterocladia</i> gen. nov. (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Botanica Marina. 40(1-6): 421-450.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Mathieson, A. C.; Dawes, C. J.; Wallace, A. L.; Klein, A. S. (2006). Distribution, morphology, and genetic affinities of dwarf embedded <i>Fucus</i> populations from the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Botanica Marina. 49(4): 283-303.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Wynne, M. J.; Leliaert, F. (2001). <i>Pedobesia simplex</i> (Kutzing) comb. nov (Chlorophyta), a new name for <i>P. lamourouxii</i> and its first report from the Indian Ocean. Cryptogam. Algol. 22, 3-14.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Mineur, F., Verlaque, M. & Johnson, M.P. (2005 (unpublished)). Traits of invasive macroalgae found in Europe. Results of the ALIENS (Algal Introductions to European Shores) project.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Rodríguez-Prieto, C.; De Clerck, O. (2009). <i>Leptofauchea coralligena</i> (Faucheaceae, Rhodophyta), a new species from the Mediterranean Sea. European Journal of Phycology. 44: 107-121.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Abbott, I. A.; Ballantine, D. L.; ODoherty, D. C. (2010). Morphological relationships within the genus <i>Lophocladia</i> (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) including a description of <i>L. kuesteri</i> sp. nov. from Hawaii. Phycologia. 49(4): 390-401.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Pedersen, P.M. (1984). Studies on primitive brown algae (Fucophyceae). Opera botanica, 74, 5-76.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Bergström, A.; Tatarenkov, A.; Johannesson, K.; Jonsson, R. B.; Kautsky, L. (2005). Genetic and morphological identification of <i>Fucus radicans</i> sp. nov (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) in the brackish Baltic Sea. Journal of Phycology. 41: 1025-1038.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Tabares, N.; Afonsocarrillo, A.-C. (1997). Morfología y distribución de <i>Thuretella schousboei</i> en las islas Canarias (Rhodophyta, Gloiosiphoniaceae). Vieraea. 26, 77-85.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Nam, K. W.; Choi, H. G. (2000). A detailed morphological study of the type species of <i>Osmundea</i> (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Bot Mar. 43, 291-297.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Cecere, E.; Perrone, C. (2002). Morphology of <i>Acanthophophora nayadiformis</i> (Ceramiales, Rhodophyceae). Phycologia. 41, 523-532.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kim, S. H.; Peters, A. F.; Kawai, H. (2003). Taxonomic revision of <i>Sphaerotrichia divaricata</i> (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae), with a reappraisal of <i>S. firma</i> from the north-west Pacific. Phycologia. 42, 183-192.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Cormaci, M.; Furnari, G. (1994). <i>Halosia elisae</i> gen. et sp. nov. (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta) from the Mediterranean Sea and Halosieae trib. nov. Phycologia. 33(1), 19-23.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Verges, A. & Rodriguez-Prieto, C. (2006). Anatomical characteristics and reproductive structures of <i>Kallymenia lacerata</i> (Kallymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) from the Mediterranean Sea. Cryptogam. Algol., 27, 31-43.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table B1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Van der Strate, H. J.; Van de Zande, L.; Stam, W. T.; Olsen, J. L. (2002). The contribution of haploids, diploids and clones to fine-scale population structure in the seaweed <i>Cladophoropsis membranacea</i> (Chlorophyta). Mol. Ecol. 11, 329-345.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Leliaert, F.; Coppejans, E.; De Clerck, O. (1998). The Siphonocladales sensu Egerod (Chlorophyta) from Papua New Guinea and Indonesia (Snellius-II Expedition). Belgian Journal of Botany. 130, 177-197.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kawai, H.; Tokuyama, M. (1995). <i>Laminarionema elsbetiae</i> gen. et sp. nov. (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae), a new endophyte in Laminaria sporophytes. Phycol Res. 43, 185-190.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Maggs, C. A.; Douglas, S. E.; Fenety, J.; Bird, C. J. (1992). A molecular and morphological analysis of the <i>Gymnogongrus devoniensis</i> (Rhodophyta) complex in the North Atlantic. Journal of Phycology. 28(2): 214-232.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Bressan, G.; Babbini, L. (2003). Biodiversità marina delle coste Italiane: Corallinales del Mar Mediterraneo: guida all'deteminazione. 10, 1-237.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Norris, R. E. (1991). The structure, reproduction and taxonomy of <i>Vidalia</i> and <i>Osmundaria</i> (Rhodophyta, Rhodomelaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 106(1): 1-40.</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Verlaque, Marc. Institut Méditerranéen d'Océanologie. marc.verlaque@mio.osupytheas.fr</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Cochrane, et al. (2010). Marine Strategy Framework Directive Task Group 1 Report. Biological Diversity. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports; OSPAR 2010 Background Document for Maërl beds. OSPAR Commission Biodiversity Series. Publication Number: 491/2010. ISBN 978-1-907390-32-6.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Cortel-Breeman, M. C.-B.; Van Den Hoek, C. (1970). Life-history studies on Rhodophyceae I. <i>Acrosymphyton purpuriferum</i>. J. Ag.) Kyl. Acta Bot. Neerl. 19, 265-284.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Clayden, S. L.; Saunders, G. W. (2010). Recognition of <i>Rubrointrusa membranacea</i> gen. et comb. nov., <i>Rhodonematella subimmersa</i> gen. et comb. nov. (with a reinterpretation of the life history) and the Meiodiscaceae fam. nov. within the Palmariales (Rhodophyta). Phycologia. 49(3), 283-300.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Loiseaux-de-Goër, S.; Noailles, M. C. (2008). Algues de Roscoff. Editions de la Station Biologique de Roscoff. p. 215.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Schneider, C. W.; Chengsupanimit, T.; Saunders, G. W. (2011). A new genus and species from the North Atlantic, <i>Archestenogramma profundum</i> (Phyllophoraceae, Rhodophyta), with taxonomic resolution of the orphaned <i>Leptofauchea brasiliensis</i>. Eur. J. Phycol. 46, 442-452.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Hasle, G. R.; Syvertsen, E. E. (1997). Marine Diatoms. pp. 5-385. In: C.R. Tomas (ed.) (1997). Identifying Marine Phytoplankton. Academic Press: San Diego, CA [etc.] (USA). ISBN 0-12-693018-X. XV, 858 pp.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table B1. Continued.**</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>DeCew, T. C.; West, J. A. (1982). A sexual life history in Rhodophy-sema (Rhodophyceae): a re-interpretation. Phycologia. 21(1): 67-74.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Burkhardt, E.; Peters, A. F. (1998). Molecular evidence from nrDNA ITS sequences that Laminariocolax (Phaeophyceae, Ectocarpales sensu lato) is a worldwide clade of closely related kelp endophytes. J Phycol. 34, 682-691.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Hooper, R.; South, G. R. (1977). Distribution and ecology of Papen-fussiella callitricha (Rosenv.) Kylin (Phaeophyceae, Chordariaceae). Phycologia. 16, 153-157.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Ercegovic, A. (1955). Contribution à la connaissance des phéophycées de l'Adriatique moyenne. Acta adriatica, 7, 5-49.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Lin, S. -M.; Yang, S. -Y.; Huisman, J. M. (2011). Systematics of Liagora with diffuse gonimoblasts based on rbcL sequences and car-posporophyte development, including the description of the new gen-era Neoizziella and Macrocarpus (Liagoraceae, Rhodophyta). Euro-pean Journal of Phycology. 46(3): 249-262.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Woelkerling, W.J. (1988). The Coralline Red Algae: an analysis of the genera and subfamilies of nongeniculate Corallinaceae. British mu-seum (Natural history) - Oxford university press London, Oxford, pp. i-xi, 1-268.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Leliaert, F.; Coppejans, E. (2006). A revision of Cladophoropsis Børgesen (Siphonocladales, Chlorophyta). Phycologia. 45, 657-679.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kawai, H. (1986). On the life history of Japanese Eudesme virescens (Carm.). J. Ag. Jap. J. Phycol. 34, 203-208.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>de Jong, Y. ; van Reine, W. F. P. (1997). A review of the genus Nema-cystus (Spermatochnaceae, Chordariales, Phaeophyceae), including phylogenetic and biogeographical hypotheses. Nova Hedwigia. 64, 1-40.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Jaasund, E. (1951). Marine algae from Northern Norway. I. Bot. No-tiser. 128-142.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Britton, N. L.; Millspaugh, C. F. (1920). The Bahama Flora. authors, New York.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Artré, F.; Boudouresque, C.-F.; Cabioch, J. (1974). Présence remar-quable du Symphyocladia marchantioides (Harvey) Falkenberg aux Açores. Bulletin de la société phycologique de France. 19: 178-182.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Rueness, J. (1974). Life history in culture and chromosome number in Isthmoplea sphaerophora (Phaeophyceae) from southern Scandi-navia. Phycologia. 13, 323-328.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Maggs, C. (1997). Life history of the rare red alga Tsengia bairdii. Cryptogamie. Algologie, 18, 151-161.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Peters, A. F. (1992). Culture studies on the life history of Chordaria linearis (Phaeophyceae) from Tierra del Fuego, South America. Jour-nal of Phycology. 28(5): 678-683.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table B1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kuhlenkamp, R.; Müller, D. (1985). Culture studies on the life history of <i>Haplospora globosa</i> and <i>Tilopteris mertensii</i> (Tilopteriidales, Phaeophyceae). Brit Phycol J. 20, 301-312.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Wilce, R.; Maggs, C. (1989). Reinstatement of the genus <i>Haemescharia</i> (Rhodophyta, Haemeschariaceae fam. nov.) for <i>H. polygyria</i> and <i>H. hennedyi</i> comb. nov. (= <i>Petrocelis hennedyi</i>). Canadian Journal of Botany. 67, 1465-1479.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Fredericq, S.; Hommersand, M. H. (1990). Morphology and systematics of <i>Holmsella pachyderma</i> (Pterocladiophilaceae, Gracilariales). Brit Phycol J. 25, 39-51.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kato, A.; Baba, M.; Kawai, H.; Masuda, M. (2006). Reassessment of the little-known crustose red algal genus <i>Polystrata</i> (Gigartinales), based on morphology and SSU rDNA sequences. J. Phycol. 42, 922-933.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Parente, M. I.; Fletcher, R. L.; Neto, A. I.; Tittley, I.; Sousa, A. F.; Draisma, S. (2010). Life history and morphological studies of <i>Punctaria tenuissima</i> (Chordariaceae, Phaeophyceae), a new record for the Azores. Bot Mar. 53, 223-231.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kawai, H. (1997). Morphology and life history of <i>Coelocladia arcitica</i> (Dictyosiphonales, Phaeophyceae), new to Japan. Phycol Res. 45, 183-187.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Forward, S. G.; South, G. R. (1985). Observations on the taxonomy and life history of North Atlantic <i>Acrothrix Kylin</i> (Phaeophyceae, Chordariales). Phycologia. 24, 347-359.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Rodríguez-Prieto, C.; Freshwater, D. W.; Hommersand, M. H. (2013). Vegetative and reproductive development of Mediterranean <i>Gulsonia nodulosa</i> (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) and its genetic affinities. Phycologia. 52(4): 357-367.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Huisman, J. M.; Kraft, G. T. (1983). <i>Gymnophycus</i>, a new genus of Ceramiaceae (Rhodophyta) from eastern Australia. Phycologia. 22(3): 285-294.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Borgesen, F. (1972). Marine algae of the Canary islands.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Coppejans, E. (1975). Végétation marine de l'île de Port-Cros (Parc National) XI. Sur Halodictyon mirabile Zanard. (Rhodophyceae). Biol. Jb. Dodonaea. 43, 116-126.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Chen, L.-M.; Edelstein, T. (1979). The life history of <i>Coilodesme bulligera</i> Strömf. (Phaeophyta, dictyosiphonales). Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science. 29: 405-410.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Díaz-tapia, P.; Bárbara, I. (2014). Seaweeds from Sand-Covered Rocks of the Atlantic Iberian Peninsula. Part 2. Palmariales, Ceramiales (Excluding Rhodomelaceae), Gelidiales, Gigartinales, Plocamiales, Rhodymeniales and Scytothamnales. Cryptogamie, Algologie. 35(2): 157-199.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Morabito, M.; Gargiulo, G. M.; Genovese, G. (2010). A review of life history pathways in bryopsis. AAPP Atti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti, Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali. 88(2).</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table B1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Coppejans, E.; Boudouresque, C.-F. (1984). Découverte du gamétophyte femelle et du tétrasporophyte de Dasyella gracilis Falkenberg (Rhodophyta, Ceramiales). Bulletin de la société royale de botanique de Belgique. 117, 8-18.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Woelkerling, W. J.; Irvine, L. M. (1982). The Genus Schmitziella Bornet-Et-Batters (Rhodophyta) - Corallinaceae or Acrochaetiaceae. Brit Phycol J. 17, 275-295.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Littler, D. S.; Littler, M. M. (1991). Systematics of Anadyomene species (Anadyomenaceae, Chlorophyta) in the tropical western Atlantic. J Phycol. 27, 101-118.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Athanasiadis, A. (1988). North Aegean marine algae. II. Studies on the thallus structure and reproduction of Nemastoma dichotomum J. Agardh and Predaea ollivieri J. Feldmann (Rhodophyta, Gigartinales). Bot Mar. 31, 23-32.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Saunders, G.; Mclachlan, J. (1991). Morphology and reproduction of Meiodiscus spetsbergensis (Kjellman) gen. et comb. nov., a new genus of Rhodophysemataceae (Rhodophyta). Phycologia. 30, 272-286.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Santelices, B. (2004). Parviphycus, a new genus in the Gelidiellaceae (Gelidiales:Rhodophyta). Cryptogamie. Algologie. 25: 313-326.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Clayton, M. N. (1979). The life history and sexual reproduction of Colpomenia peregrina (Scytosiphonaceae, Phaeophyta) in Australia. Brit Phycol J. 14, 1-10.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Gabrielson, P. W.; Hommersand, M. H. (1982). The atlantic species of Solieria (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta): their morphology, distribution and affinities. J Phycol. 18, 31-45.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Magne, F. (1990). Reproduction sexuée chez Erythrotrichia carnea (Rhodophyceae, Erythropeltidales). Cryptog., Algol., 11, 157-170.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Newton, C.; Bracken, M. E. S.; Mcconville, M.; Rodrigue, K.; Thornber, C. S. (2013). Invasion of the Red Seaweed Heterosiphonia japonica Spans Biogeographic Provinces in the Western North Atlantic Ocean. PLoS One. 8, 7.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Ardré, F. (1970). Observations sur le genre Aphanocladia Falkenberg et sur ses affinités. Revue algologique, 1, 37-55.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Pedersen, P. M. L. (1974). On the systematic position of Delamarea attenuata (Phaeophyceae). Brit Phycol J. 9, 313-318.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Abbott, I. A.; Doty, M. S. (1960). Studies in the Helminthocladiaceae II. Trichogloeopsis. American Journal of Botany. 632-640.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kornmann, P. (1972). Ein Beitrag zur Taxonomie der Gattung Chaetomorpha (Cladophorales, Chlorophyta). Helgol. Wiss. Meeresunters. 23, 1-31.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Saunders, G. W.; Virginia Lehmkuhl, K. (2005). Molecular divergence and morphological diversity among four cryptic species of Plocamium (Plocamiales, Florideophyceae) in northern Europe. European Journal of Phycology. 40(3): 293-312.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table B1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><th>Type</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Müller, D. G.; Parodi, E. R.; Peters, A. F. (1999). <i>Asterocladon lobatum</i> gen. et sp. nov., a new brown alga with stellate chloroplast arrangement, and its systemic position judged from nuclear rDNA sequences. Phycologia. 37: 425-432, 14 figs, 4 tables.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Pedersen, P. M. (1989). Studies on <i>Kuckuckia spinosa</i> (Fucophyceae, Sorocarpaceae): life history, temperature gradient experiments, and synonymy. Nordic Journal of Botany. 9(4): 443-447.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Masuda, M.; Guiry, M. D. (1995). Reproductive morphology of <i>Itonoa marginifera</i> (J. Agardh) gen. et comb. nov. (Nemastomataceae, Rhodophyta). European Journal of Phycology. 30(1): 57-67.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Cecere, E.; Saracino, O. D.; Petrocelli, A. (2002). Propagules of <i>Altidium corallinum</i> (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Botanica Marina. 45(6): 580-585.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Hamel, G. (1931). Phéophycées de France. Paris.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Berecibar, E.; Wynne, M. J.; Santos, R. (2009). Report of the brown alga <i>Zosterocarpus oedogonium</i> (Ectocarpales) from Portugal, its first recorded occurrence outside of the Mediterranean Sea. Nova Hedwigia. 89, 237-244.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Hanic, L. A.; Lindstrom, S. C. (2008). Life history and systematic studies of <i>Pseudothrix borealis</i> gen. et sp. nov. (=North Pacific Capsosiphon Groenlandicus, Ulotrichaceae, Chlorophyta). Algae. 23: 119-133.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Wilce, R. T.; Pedersen, P. M.; Sekida, S. (2009). <i>Chukchia pedicellata</i> gen. et sp. nov. and C. endophytica nov. comb., arctic endemic brown algae (Phaeophyceae). Journal of Phycology. 45: 272-286.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Mols-Mortensen, A.; Neefus, C. D.; Nielsen, R.; Gunnarsson, K.; Egilsdottir, S.; Pedersen, P. M.; Brodie, J. (2012). New insights into the biodiversity and generic relationships of foliose Bangiales (Rhodophyta) in Iceland and the Faroe Islands. European Journal of Phycology. 47(2): 146-159.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Probyn, T. A.; Chapman, A. R. O. (1983). Summer growth of <i>Chordaria flagelliformis</i> (O.F. Muell.) C. Ag.: Physiological strategies in a nutrient stressed environment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 73(3): 243-271.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Müller, D. G.; Meel, H. (1982). Culture studies on the life history of <i>Arthrocladia villosa</i> (Desmarestiales, Phaeophyceae). British Phycological Journal. 17(4): 419-425.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kawai, H.; Hanyuda, T.; Draisma, S. G. A.; Müller, D. G. (2007). Molecular phylogeny of <i>Discosporangium mesarthrocarpum</i> (Phaeophyceae) with a reinstatement of the order Discosporangiales. Journal of Phycology. 43(1): 186-194.</td></tr><tr><td>Expert</td><td>Le Gall, Line; Leliaert, Frederik and De Clerck, Olivier.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Montanes, M. A.; Sanson, M.; Reyes, J. (2006). Vegetative and reproductive phenology of <i>Zonaria tournefortii</i> (Dictyotales, Phaeophyceae) in sublittoral populations off the Canary Islands. Bot Mar. 49, 406-416.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table B1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kornmann, P. (1989). Sahlingia nov. gen. based on <i>Erythrocladia subintegra</i> (Erythropeltidales, Rhodophyta). Brit Phycol J. 24, 223-228.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Rodriguez-Prieto, C.; Hommersand, M.H. (2009). Behaviour of the nuclei in pre- and postfertilization stages in <i>Kallymenia</i> (Kallymeniaceae, Rhodophyta). Phycologia. 48, 138-155.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Woelkerling, W. J. (1987). The genus <i>Choreonema</i> in southern Australia and its subfamilial classification within the Corallinaceae (Rhodophyta). Phycologia. 26, 111-127.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Mshigeni, K. (1977). The morphology and distribution ecology of <i>Corynomorpha prismatica</i>: A red seaweed of potential economic significance in southeast Tanzania. Marine Biology. 42, 157-160.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Mayhoub, H., Gayral, P. & Jacques, R. (1976). Action de la composition spectrale de la lumière sur la croissance et la reproduction de <i>Calosiphonia vermicularis</i> (J. Agardh) Schmitz (Rhodophycées, Gигartinales). Comptes rendus de l'académie des sciences à Paris, série D, 283, 1041.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>South, G. R.; Hooper, R. G. (1976). <i>Stictyosiphon soriferus</i> (Phaeophyta, Dictyosiphonales) from eastern North America. J Phycol. 12, 24-29.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Whittick, A. (1977). The reproductive ecology of <i>Plumaria elegans</i> (Bonnem.) Schmitz (Ceramiaceae: rhodophyta) at its northern limits in the western Atlantic. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 29(3): 223-230.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Roberts, K. R.; Stewart, K. D.; Mattox, K. R. (1982). Structure of the anisogametes of the green siphon <i>Pseudobryopsis</i> sp. (Chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology. 18(4): 498-508.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Falkenberg, P. (1901). Die Rhodomelaceen des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. O. Koeltz science publishers Berlin. 754 pp. + 724 Taf.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Afonso-Carrillo, J. (1988). Structure and reproduction of <i>Spongites wildpretii</i> sp. nov. (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta) from the Canary Islands, with observations and comments on <i>Spongites absimile</i> comb. nov. British Phycological Journal. 23(1): 89-102.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Peters, A. F. (1988). Culture studies of a sexual life history in <i>Myriotrichia clavaeformis</i> (Phaeophyceae, Dictyosiphonales). Brit Phycol J. 23, 299-306.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Jaasund, E. (1960). Fosliea curta (Fosl.) Reinke and <i>Isthmoplea sphaerophora</i> (Carm.) Kjellman. Bot Mar. 2, 174-181.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Phillips, L. E.; De clerck, O. (2005). The terete and sub-terete members of the red algal tribe Amansieae (Ceramiales, Rhodomelaceae). Cryptogam. Algol. 26, 5-33.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Saunders, G. W.; McLachlan, J. L. (1990). Taxonomic considerations of the genus <i>Rhodophysema</i> and the Rhodophysemataceae fam. nov. (Rhodophyta, Florideophycidae). Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science. 39: 19-26.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table B1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Wang, W.-L.; Liu, S.-L.; Lin, S.-M. (2005). Systematics of the calcified genera of the <i>Galaxauraceae</i> (Nemaliales, Rhodophyta) with an emphasis on Taiwan species. Journal of Phycology. 41(3): 685-703.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>N'Yeurt, A. D. R.; Payri, C. E. (2010). Marine algal flora of French Polynesia III. Rhodophyta, with additions to the Phaeophyceae and Chlorophyta. Cryptogamie. Algologie. 31(1): 3-205.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Berger, S.; Kaever, M. J. (1992). Dasycladales: an illustrated monograph of a fascinating algal order. Thieme, Stuttgart.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Di Camillo, C.; Puce, S.; Romagnoli, T.; Tazioli, S.; Totti, C.; Bavestrello, G. (2006). Coralline algae epibionthic on thecate hydrozoans (Cnidaria). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK. 86(06): 1285-1289.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Sauvageau, C. (1933). Sur quelques Algues phéosporées de Guéthary (Basses-Pyrénées). Bull. Stn biol. Arcachon. 30, 1-128.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Loiseaux, S. (1969). Sur une espèce de <i>Myriotrichia</i> obtenue en culture à partir de zoïdes d'Hecatonema maculans Sauv. Phycologia. 8(1), 11-15.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Fredersdorf, J.; Müller, R.; Becker, S.; Wiencke, C.; Bischof, K. (2009). Interactive effects of radiation, temperature and salinity on different life history stages of the Arctic kelp <i>Alaria esculenta</i> (Phaeophyceae). Oecologia. 160, 483-492.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Bedini, R.; Bonechi, L.; Piazzi, L. (2011). Spread of the introduced red alga <i>Lophocladia lallemandii</i> in the Tuscan Archipelago (NW Mediterranean Sea). Cryptogam. Algol. 32, 383-391.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Sartoni, G. (1992). <i>Stichothamnion cymatophilum</i> (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) a new record for mediterranean algal flora. Cryptogamie, algologie, 13, 39-43.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Martin, M.J., Sansón, M. & Reyes, J (1996). Morphology and anatomy of <i>Papenfussiella Kuromo</i> (Chordariaceae, Phaeophyta) from the Canary Islands. Cryptogamie, algologie, 17, 165.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Hoek Van den, C. (1983). <i>Bryobesia johannae</i>, a small tropical representative of the order Cladophorales (Chlorophyceae). J Phycol. 19, 116-118.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Baardseth, E. (1975). <i>Cryptopleura ramosa</i> (Huds.) Kylin ex Newton (Rhodophyceae) and <i>Omphalophyllum ulvaceum</i> Rosenv. (Phaeophyceae) new to Norway. Sarsia. 57, 109-112.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Zuccarello, G.; West, J.; Bitans, A.; Kraft, G. (2000). Molecular phylogeny of <i>Rhodochaete parvula</i> (Bangiophycidae, Rhodophyta). Phycologia. 39, 75-81.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Phillips, J. A. (2006). Drifting blooms of the endemic filamentous brown alga <i>Hincksia sordida</i> at Noosa on the subtropical east Australian coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 52(8): 962-968.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Van de Poll, W. H.; Bischof, K.; Buma, A. G. J.; Breeman, A. M. (2003). Habitat related variation in UV tolerance of tropical marine red macrophytes is not temperature dependent. Physiologia Plantarum. 118(1): 74-83.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table B1. Continued.**</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Clayton, M. N. (1982). Life history studies in the Ectocarpales (Phaeophyta): contributions toward the understanding of evolutionary processes. Botanica Marina. 25: 111–16.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>De Clerck, O.; Leliaert, F.; Verbruggen, H.; Lane, C. E.; De Paula, J. C.; Payo, D. A.; Coppejans, E. (2006). A revised classification of the Dictyoteae (Dictyotales, Phaeophyceae) based on rbcL and 26S ribosomal DNA sequence analyses. J Phycol. 42, 1271–1288.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Nam, K. W. (1999). Morphology of <i>Chondrophycus undulata</i> and <i>C. parvipapillata</i> and its implications for the taxonomy of the <i>Laurencia</i> (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) complex. Eur. J. Phycol. 34, 455–468.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Peña, V.; Bárbara, I. (2013). Non-coralline crustose algae associated with maerl beds in Portugal: a reappraisal of their diversity in the Atlantic Iberian beds. Botanica Marina. 56(5-6): 481–493.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Wysor, B.; O’Kelly, C. J.; Bellows, W. K.; Brown, J. F. (2004). The demise of the Chaetosiphonaceae (Cladoporales, Chlorophyta): Morphology and molecular phylogeny of <i>Chaetosiphon moniliformis</i>, <i>Blastosypha</i> spp. and <i>Wittrockiella</i> spp. Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences USA.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Verbruggen, H.; Vlaeminck, C.; Sauvage, T.; Sherwood, A. R.; Leliaert, F.; De Clerck, O. (2009). Phylogenetic analysis of <i>Pseudochlorodesmis</i> strains reveals cryptic diversity above the family level in the siphonous green algae (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology. 45(3): 726–731.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Boudouresque, C.-F.; Coppejans, E.; Marcot, J. (1976). Un nouveau genre de Peysonneliaceae, <i>Metapeyssonnelia</i> (Rhodophyta). Phycologia. 15, 283–288.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Catra, M.; Alongi, G. (2013). On some new and interesting marine macroalgae from the Greek coasts (Mediterranean Sea). Nova Hedwigia. 97, 3–4.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Perrone, C.; Cecere, E. (1994). Two Solieriacean algae new to the mediterranean: <i>Agardhiella subulata</i> and <i>Solieria filiformis</i> (Rhodophyta, Gigartinales). J. Phycol. 30, 98–108.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Seoane-Camba, S. A. (1989). Origin and structure of secondary synapses between the parasite <i>Gelidiocolax deformans</i> (Gelidiaceae, Rhodophyceae) and its host <i>Gelidium sesquipedale</i> (Gelidiaceae, Rhodophyta). Cryptogamie, Algologie. 10, 259.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Decew, T. C.; West, J. A.; Ganesan, E. (1981). The life histories and developmental morphology of two species of <i>Gloiosiphonia</i> (Rhodophyta: Cryptonemiales, Gloiosiphoniaceae) from the Pacific Coast of North America. Phycologia. 20, 415–423.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kraft, G.T. (2009). Algae of Australia. Marine benthic algae of Lord Howe Island and the southern Great Barrier Reef, 2. Brown algae. pp. [i-iv], v-vi, 1-364, 107 figs. Erratum of fig. 73 from vol. 1. Canberra & Melbourne: Australian Biological Resources Study and CSIRO Publishing.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table B1. Continued.</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Taskin, E. (2013). First report of the North Atlantic myriomastoid brown alga <i>Ulonema rhizophorum</i> Foslie (Phaeophyceae, Chordariaceae) in the Mediterranean Sea. Mediterranean Marine Science. 14(1): 125-128.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Lee, R. (1973). General Ecology of the Canadian Arctic Benthic Marine Algae. ARCTIC. 26(1).</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Clayton, M.N. (1974). Studies on the development, life history and taxonomy of the Ectocarpales (Phaeophyta) in southern Australia. Australian journal of botany. 22(4), 743-813.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Borja, A.; Franco, J.; Pérez, V. (2000). A Marine Biotic Index to Establish the Ecological Quality of Soft-Bottom Benthos Within European Estuarine and Coastal Environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 40(12), 1100-1114 + updated in http://ambi.azti.es (last access: 26 September 2022) (AMBI list of June 2019).</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Adams, N. M. (1994). Seaweeds of new Zealand. An illustrated guide. 306p.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Zubia, M.; Draisma, S. G. A.; Morrissey, K. L.; Varela-Álvarez, E.; De Clerck, O. (2019). Concise review of the genus <i>Caulerpa</i> J.V. Lamouroux. Journal of Applied Phycology. 32(1): 23-39.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Kornmann, P.; Sahling, P.-H. (1988). Die Entwirrung des Botrytella (Sorocarpus)-Komplexes (Ectocarpaceae, Phaeophyta). Helgol. Meeresunters. 42, 1-12.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>O'Kelly, C. J.; Wysor, B.; Bellows, W. K. (2004). Gene sequence diversity and the phylogenetic position of algae assigned to the genera <i>Phaeophila</i> and <i>Ochlochaete</i> (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology. 40(4): 789-799.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Steentoft, M.; Irvine, L. M.; Farnham, W. F. (1995). Two terete species of <i>Gracilaria</i> and <i>Gracilariopsis</i> (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) in Britain. Phycologia. 34, 113-127.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Laturnus, F. (1996). Volatile halocarbons released from Arctic macroalgae. Mar. Chem. 55, 359-366.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Hind, K. R.; Saunders, G. W. (2013). A molecular phylogenetic study of the tribe Corallineae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) with an assessment of genus-level taxonomic features and descriptions of novel genera. Journal of Phycology. 49(1): 103-114.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Maggs, C. A.; Guiry, M. D. (1987). An Atlantic population of <i>Pikea californica</i> (Dumontiaceae, Rhodophyta). Journal of Phycology. 23(1): 170-176.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Hayakawa, Y. I.; Ogawa, T.; Yoshikawa, S.; Ohki, K.; Kamiya, M. (2012). Genetic and ecophysiological diversity of <i>Cladophora</i> (Cladophorales, Ulvophyceae) in various salinity regimes. Phycol Res. 60, 86-97.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Secilla, A., Santolaria, A., Diez, I., Berecibar, E., Diaz, P., Bárbara, I. et al. (2008). <i>Scageliopsis patens</i> (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta), a new introduced species along the European coast. Cryptogam. Algol., 29, 191-199.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>De Clerck, O.; Gavio, B.; Fredericq, S.; Barbara, I.; Coppejans, E. (2005). Systematics of <i>Grateloupia filicina</i> (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta), based on rbcL sequence analyses and morphological evidence, including the reinstatement of <i>G. minima</i> and the description of <i>G. capensis</i> sp nov. J Phycol. 41: 391-410.</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table B1. Continued.**</caption><thead><tr><td>Type</td><td>Source</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Olsen, J. L.; Zechman, F. W.; Hoarau, G.; Coyer, J. A.; Stam, W. T.; Valero, M. (2010). The phylogeographic architecture of the fucoid seaweed <i>Ascophyllum nodosum</i>: an intertidal 'marine tree' and survivor of more than one glacial-interglacial cycle. Journal of biogeography, 37, 842-856.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Leliaert, F.; Rueness, J.; Boedeker, C.; Maggs, C. A.; Cocquyt, E.; Verbruggen, H.; De Clerck, O. (2009). Systematics of the marine microfilamentous green algae <i>Uronema curvatum</i> and <i>Urospora microscopica</i> (Chlorophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 44, 487-496.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>R. D. Wood. 1951. The Characeae. Botanical Review, Vol. 18, No. 5 (May, 1952), pp. 317-353</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Rodríguez-Prieto, C.; De Clerck, O.; Huisman, J.M.; Lin, S.-M. (2018). Systematics of the red algal genus <i>Halymenia</i> (Halymeniaaceae, Rhodophyta): characterization of the generitype <i>H. floresii</i> and description of <i>Neofolia rosea</i> gen. et sp. nov. European Journal of Physiology. 53(4): 520-536.</td></tr><tr><td>Literature</td><td>Huvé, P.; Huvé, H. (1976). Contribution à la connaissance de l'algue <i>Halichrysis depressa</i> (Montagne 1838 in J. Ag. 1851) Bornet 1892 (Rhodophycées, Rhodyméniales). Phycologia. 15(3-4): 377-392.</td></tr></tbody></table>

**Supplement.** The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2711-2023-supplement.

**Author contributions.** SV, MR, IBD, IB, AB, C-FB, CD, BDR, PD-T, AH, RJ, RK. PK, SAKH, RK, AFP, VP, CP-C, FB, FR, JR, HS, IKS, MS, DS, TT, MVa, AV, MVe, CV, LL, FL, and ODC contributed data. SV and MR collated the data and performed quality control. SD, WD, BV, and LV supported data curation. SV performed analysis and wrote the original draft with help from MR, LV, LL, FL, and ODC. All authors approved and contributed to the final draft for submission. LLG, FL, and ODC contributed equally as last authors.

**Competing interests.** The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

**Disclaimer.** Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

**Financial support.** This research has been supported by the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (grant nos. GOH3817N, I001621N, I000819N, and I002021N) and the European Union (grant no. SI2.657705).

**Review statement.** This paper was edited by Giuseppe M.R. Manzella and reviewed by Annalisa Minelli and one anonymous referee.

## References

* Åberg, P.: A demographic study of two populations of the seaweed *Ascophyllum nodosum*, Ecology, 73, 1473-1487, https://doi.org/10.2307/1940691, 1992.

* Albecker, M. A., Wilkins, L. G., Krueger-Hadfield, S. A., Bашевкин, S. M., Hahn, M. W., Hare, M. P., Kindsvater, H. K., Sewell, M. A., Lotterhos, K. E., and Reitzel, A. M.: Does a complex life cycle affect adaptation to environmental change? Genome-informed insights for characterizing selection across complex life cycle, P. R. Soc. B, 288, 20212122, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2122, 2021.

* Albouy, C., Delattre, V. L., Mérigot, B., Meynard, C. N., and Leprieur, F.: Multifaceted biodiversity hotspots of marine mammals for conservation priorities, Divers. Distrib., 23, 615-626, https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12556, 2017.

* AlgaeTraits: A trait database for European seaweeds, AlgaeTraits [data set], https://doi.org/10.14284/574, 2022.

* Appeltans, W., Ahyong, S. T., Anderson, G., Angel, M. V., Artois, T., Bailly, N., Bamber, R., Barber, A., Bartsch, I., Berta, A., and Błažewicz-Paszkowycz, M.: The magnitude of global marine species diversity, Curr. Biol., 22, 2189-2202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.036, 2012.

* Arenas, F., Sánchez, I., Hawkins, S. J., and Jenkins, S. R.: The invasibility of marine algal assemblages: role of functional diversity and identity, Ecol-
ogy, 87, 2851-2861, https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2851:tiomaa]2.0.co;2, 2006.

Araújo, R., Serrão, E.A., Sousa-Pinto, I., and Åberg, P.: Phenotypic differentiation at southern limit borders: the case study of two fucoid macroalgal species with different life-history traits, J. Phycol., 47, 451-462, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.00986.x, 2011.

Balata, D., Piazzi, L., and Cinelli, F.: Increase of sedimentation in a subtidal system: effects on the structure and diversity of macroalgal assemblages, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 351, 73-82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.06.019, 2007.

Beauchard, O., Veríssimo, H., Queirós, A. M., and Herman, P. M. J.: The use of multiple biological traits in marine community ecology and its potential in ecological indicator development, Ecol. Indic., 76, 81-96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.011, 2017.

Bell, G.: The comparative biology of the alternation of generations, in: Lectures on mathematics in life sciences: The evolution of haplo-diploid life cycles, edited by: Kirpatrick M., American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1-26, ISBN 0-8218-1176-2, 1994.

Benita, M., Dubinsky, Z., and Iluz, D.: Padina pavonica: morphology and calcification functions and mechanism, Am. J. Plant Sci., 9, 1156-1168, https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2018.96087, 2018.

Beukeboom, L. W. and Perrin, N.: The evolution of sex determination, Oxford University Press, USA, ISBN 978-0-19-965714-8, 2014.

Bremner, J.: Species' traits and ecological functioning in marine conservation and management, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 366, 37-47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2008.07.007, 2008.

Brodie, J., Maggs, C. A., and John, D. M.: Green Seaweeds of Britain and Ireland, British Phycological Society, The United Kingdom, ISBN 0952711532, 2007.

Cappelatti, L., Mauffrey, A. R., and Griffin, J. N.: Applying continuous functional traits to large brown macroalgae: variation across tidal emersion and wave exposure gradients, Mar. Biol., 166, 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3574-5, 2019.

Cardeccia, A., Marchini, A., Occhipinti-Ambrogu, A., Gali, I. B., Gollasch, S., Minchin, D., Narščius, A., Olenin, S., and Ojaveer, H.: Assessing biological invasions in European Seas: Biological traits of the most widespread non-indigenous species, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 201, 17-28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.02.014, 2018.

Chapman, V. J. and Chapman, D. J.: Life forms in the algae, Bot. Mar., 19, 65-74, https://doi.org/10.1515/botm.1976.19.2.65, 1976.

Charlier, R. H., Morand, P., and Finkl, C. W.: How Brittany and Florida coasts cope with green tides, Int. J. Environ. Sci., 65, 191-208, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230701791448, 2008.

Coelho, S. M., Scornet, D., Rousvoal, S., Peters, N. T., Dartevelle, L., Peters, A. F., and Cock, J. M.: Ectocarpus: A model organism for the brown algae, Cold Spring Harb. Protoc., 2, pdb.Emo065821, https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.emo065821, 2012.

Costello, M. J., Claus, S., Dekeyzer, S., Vandepitte, L., Tuama, E. O., Lear, D., and Tyler-Walters, H.: Biological and ecological traits of marine species, PeerJ, 3, e1201, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1201, 2015.

Costello, M. J., Bouchet, P., Boxshall, G., Arvanitidis, C., and Apeltans, W.: European Register of Marine Species, http://www.marbef.org/data/erms.php, last access: 29 April 2022.

Degen, R., Aune, M., Bluhm, B. A., Cassidy, C., Kędra, M., Kraan, C., Vandepitte, L., Włodarska-Kowalczuk, M., Zhulay, I., and Albano, P. G.: Trait-based approaches in rapidly changing ecosystems: A roadmap to the future polar oceans, Ecol. Indic., 91, 722-736, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.050, 2018.

Demes, K. W. and Graham, M. H.: Abiotic regulation of investment in sexual versus vegetative reproduction in the clonal kelp Laminaria Sinclairii (laminariales, Phaeophyceae), J. Phycol., 47, 463-470, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.00981.x, 2011.

Destombe, C., Valero, M., Vernet, P., and, Couvet, D.: What controls haploid-diploid ratio in the red alga, Gracilaria verrucosa?, J. Evol. Biol., 2, 317-338, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1989.2050317.x, 1989.

De Wreede, R. E. and Klinger, T.: Reproductive strategies in algae, in: Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies, edited by: Doust, J. L. and Doust, J. J., Oxford University Press, New York, 267-284, ISBN 0-19-505175-0, 1988.

Díaz, S., Purvis, A., Cornelissen, J. H., Mace, G. M., Donoghue, M. J., Ewers, R. M., Jordano, P., and Pearse, W. D.: Functional traits, the phylogeny of function, and ecosystem service vulnerability, Ecol. Evol., 3, 2958-2975, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.601, 2013.

Engel, C., Åberg, P., Gaggiotti, O. E., Destombe, C., and Valero, M.: Population dynamics and stage structure in a haploid-diploid red seaweed, Gracilaria gracilis, J. Ecol., 436-450, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00567.x, 2001.

Esmaeili, Y. S., Corte, G. N., Checon, H. H., Bilatto, C. G., Lefcheck, J. S., Zacagnini Amaral, A. C., and Turra, A.: Revealing the drivers of taxonomic and functional diversity of nearshore fish assemblages: Implications for conservation priorities, Divers. Distrib., 28, 1597-1609, https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13453, 2022.

Feldmann, J.: Les types biologiques d'algues marines benthiques, B. Soc. Bot. Fr., 113, 45-60, https://doi.org/10.1080/00378941.1966.10838473, 1966.

Fowler-Walker, M. J., Wernberg, T., and Connell S. D.: Differences in kelp morphology between wave sheltered and exposed localities: morphologically plastic or fixed traits?, Mar. Biol., 148, 755-767, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-005-0125-z, 2006.

Garbary, D. J.: Harvesting Ascophyllum nodosum (Phaeophyceae) reduces the abundance of its host-specific epiphyte Vertebrata lanosa (Rhodophyta), Bot. Mar., 60, 297-301, https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2016-0074, 2017.

Gaspar, R., Pereira, L., and Neto, J.M.: Intertidal zonation and latitudinal gradients on macroalgal assemblages: Species, functional groups and thallus morphology approaches, Ecol. Indic., 81, 90-103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.060, 2017.

Gómez, I. and Huovinen, P.: Form and Function in Antarctic Seaweeds: Photobiological Adaptations, Zonation Patterns, and Ecosystem Feedbacks, in: Antarctic Seaweeds, edited by: Gómez, I. and Huovinen, P., Springer, Cham, 217-237, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39448-6_11, 2020.

Gómez, I., Navarro, N. P., and Huovinen, P.: Bio-optical and physiological patterns in Antarctic seaweeds: a functional trait based
approach to characterize vertical zonation, Prog. Oceanogr., 174, 17-27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2018.03.013, 2019.

Guiry, M. D.: How many species of algae are there?, J. Phycol., 48, 1057-1063, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01222.x, 2012.

Guiry, M. D. and Guiry, G. M.: AlgaeBase, https://www.algaebase.org/, last access: 2 May 2022.

Heesch, S., Serrano-Serrano, M., Barrera-Redondo, J., Luthringer, R., Peters, A. F., Destombe, C., Cock, J. M., Valero, M., Roze, D., Salamin, N., and Coelho, S. M.: Evolution of life cycles and reproductive traits: insights from the brown algae, J. Evol. Biol., 34, 992-1009, https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13880, 2021.

Hoshino, M., Hiruta, S. F., Croce, M. E., Kamiya, M., Jomori, T., Wakimoto, T., and Kogame, K.: Geographical parthenogenesis in the brown alga Scytosiphon lomentaria (Scytosiphonaceae): Sexuals in warm waters and parthenogens in cold waters, Mol. Ecol., 30, 5814-5830, https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16152, 2021.

Kattge, J., Ogle, K., Bönisch, G., Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., Madin, J., Nadrowski, K., Nöllert, S., Sartor, K., and Wirth, C.: A generic structure for plant trait databases, Methods Ecol. Evol., 2, 202-213, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00067.x, 2011.

Kim, S., Choi, S. K., Van, S., Kim, S. T., Kang, Y. H., and Park, S. R.: Geographic differentiation of morphological characteristics in the brown seaweed *Sargassum thunbergii* along the Korean coast: A Response to Local Environmental Conditions, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10, 2-15, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10040549, 2022.

Lavaut, E., Guillemin, M.-L., Colin, S., Faure, A., Coudret, J., Destombe, C., and Valero, M.: Pollinators of the sea: A discovery of animal-mediated fertilization in seaweed, Science, 377, 528-530, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo6661, 2022.

Lawrence, E.: Henderson's dictionary of Biology, 13th edition, Pearson Education Limited, London, UK, ISBN 9780131273849, 2005.

Lincoln, R. J., Boxshall, G. A., and Clark, P. F.: Dictionary of ecology, evolution and systematics, 2nd ed, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9780521438421, 1998.

Littler, M. M. and Littler, D. S.: The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies in benthic marine macroalgae: field and laboratory tests of functional form model, Am. Nat., 116, 25-44, https://doi.org/10.1086/283610, 1980.

Littler, M. M., Littler, D. S., and Taylor P. R.: Evolutionary strategies in a tropical barrier reef system: functionale from groups of marine macroalgae, J. Phycol., 19, 229-237, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1983.00229.x, 1983.

Lüning, K.: Seaweeds: their environment, biogeography, and ecophysiology, John Wiley & Sons, https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.327001020, 1991.

Nyberg, C. and Wallentinus, I.: Can species traits be used to predict macroalgal introductions?, Biol. Invasions, 7, 265-279, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-004-0738-z, 2005.

Maggs, C. A.: Intraspecific life history variability in the Florideophycidae (Rhodophyta), Bot. Mar., 31, 465-490, https://doi.org/10.1515/botm.1988.31.6.465, 1988.

Maggs, C. A. and Hommersand, M. H.: Seaweeds of the British Isles Volume 1 Rhodophyta Part 3A Ceramiales, The Natural History Museum, London, UK, ISBN 0113100450, 1993.

Marine Species Traits: Marine Species Traits, https://www.marinespecies.org/traits, last access: 25 August 2022.

MarLIN: BIOTIC - Biological Traits Information Catalogue, Marine Life Information Network, Plymouth, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, https://www.marlin.ac.uk/ biotic, last access: 31 August 2022, 2006.

Martini, S., Larras, F., Boyé, A., Faure, E., Aberle, N., Archambault, P., Bacouillard, L., Beisner, B.E., Bittner, L., Castella, E., Danger, M., Gauthier, O., Karp-Boss, L., Lombard, F., Maps, F., Stemmann, L., Thiébaut, E., Usseglio-Polatera, P., Vogt, M., Laviale, M., and Ayata, S.-D.: Functional trait-based approaches as a common framework for aquatic ecologists, Limnol. Oceanogr., 66, 965-994, https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11655, 2021.

Mauffrey, A. R. L., Cappelatti, L., and Griffin, J. N.: Seaweed functional diversity revisited: confronting traditional groups with quantitative traits, J. Ecol., 3, 2390-2405, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13460, 2020.

McGill, B. J., Enquist, B. J., Weiher, E., and Westoby, M.: Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits, Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 178-185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002, 2006.

Murúa, P., Müller, D. G., Patiño, D. J., and Westermeier, R.: Giant kelp vegetative propagation: Adventitious holdfast elements rejuvenate senescent individuals of the *Macrocystis pyrifera* "integrifolia" ecomorph, J. Phycol., 53, 230-234, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12493, 2017.

Oppliger, L. V., Von Dassow, P., Bouchemousse, S., Robuchon, M., Valero, M., Correa, J. A., Mauger, S., and Destombe, C.: Alteration of sexual reproduction and genetic diversity in the kelp species *Laminaria digitata* at the southern limit of its range, PLoS One, 9, e102518, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102518, 2014.

Orfanidis, S., Panayotidis, P., and Ugland, K. I.: Ecological Evaluation Index continuous formula (EEI-c) application: a step forward for functional groups, the formula and reference condition values, Mediterr. Mar. Sci., 12, 199-231, https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.60, 2011.

Pentecost, A.: Calcification in plants, in: International Review of Cytology, Academic Press, 62, 1-27, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61897-5, 1980.

Pierucci, A., De La Fuente, G., Cannas, R., and Chiantore, M.: A new record of the invasive seaweed *Caulerpa cylindracea* Sonder in the South Adriatic Sea, Heliyon, 5, e02449, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02449, 2019.

Quell, F., Schratzberger, M., Beauchard, O., Bruggeman, J., and Webb, T.: Biological trait profiles discriminate between native and non-indigenous marine invertebrates, Aquat. Invasions, 16, 571-600, https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2021.16.4.01, 2021.

Ruuskanen, A., Bäck, S., and Reitalu, T.: A comparison of two cartographic exposure methods using *Fucus vesiculosus* as an indicator, Mar. Biol., 134, 139-145, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270050532, 1999.

Ryznar, E. R., Fong, P., and Fong, C. R.: When form does not predict function: Empirical evidence violates functional form hypotheses for marine macroalgae, J. Ecol., 109, 833-846, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13509, 2020.

SeaTraIn: SeaTraIn, https://seaweedtraits.github.io/, last access: 31 August 2022.

Serisawa, Y., Aoki, M., Hirata, T., Bellgrove, A., Kurashima, A., Tsuchiya, Y., Sato, T., Ueda, H., and Yokohama, Y.
Y.: Growth and survival rates of large-type sporophytes of Ecklonia cava transplanted to a growth environment with small-type sporophytes, J. Appl. Phycol., 15, 311–318, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025183100958, 2003.

Smetacek, V. and Zingone, A.: Green and golden seaweed tides on the rise, Nature, 504, 84–88, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12860, 2013.

Spalding, M. D., Fox, H. E., Allen, G. R., Davidson, N., Ferdaña, Z. A., Finlayson, M. A. X., Halpern, B. S., Jorge, M. A., Lombana, A. L., Lourie, S. A., and Martin, K. D.: Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas, BioScience, 57, 573–583, https://doi.org/10.1641/B570707, 2007.

Steneck, R. S. and Dethier, M. N.: A functional group approach to the structure of algal-dominated communities, Oikos, 69, 476–498, https://doi.org/10.2307/3545860, 1994.

Stevenson, J.: Ecological assessments with algae: a review and synthesis, J. Phycol., 50, 437–461, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12189, 2014.

Schleuning, M., Neuschulz, E. L., Albrecht, J., Bender, I. M., Bowler, D. E., Dehling, D. M., Fritz, S. A., Hof, C., Mueller, T., Nowak, L., and Sorensen, M. C.: Trait-based assessments of climate-change impacts on interacting species, Trends Ecol. Evol., 35, 319–328, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.12.010, 2020.

Vandepitte, L., Vanhoorne, B., Decock, W., Dekeyzer, S., Trias Verbeek, A., Bovit, L., Hernandez, F., and Mees, J.: How Aphia – the platform behind several online and taxonomically oriented databases – can serve both the taxonomic community and the field of biodiversity informatics, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 3, 1448–1473, https://hdl.handle.net/10.3390/jmse3041448, 2015.

Vandepitte, L., Vanhoorne, B., Decock, W., Vranken, S., Lanssens, T., Dekeyzer, S., Verfaille, K., Horton, T., Kroh, A., Hernandez, F., and Mees, J.: A decade of the World Register of Marine Species—General insights and experiences from the Data Management Team: Where are we, what have we learned and how can we continue?, PLoS One, 13, e0194599, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194599, 2018.

Veiga, P., Rubal, M., Vieira, R., Arenas, F., and Sousa-Pinto, I.: Spatial variability in intertidal macroalgal assemblages on the North Portuguese coast: consistence between species and functional group approaches, Helgoland Mar. Res., 67, 191–201, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-012-0315-2, 2013.

Vélez-Rubio, G. M., González-Etchebehere, L., Scarabino, F., Trinchin, R., Manta, G., Laporta, M., Zabaleta, M., Vidal, V., de Leon-Mackey, A., and Kruk, C.: Macroalgae morpho-functional groups in Southern marine ecosystems: rocky intertidal in the Southwestern Atlantic (33°–35° S), Mar. Biol., 168, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03960-6, 2021.

Violle, C., Navas, M. L., Vile, D., Kazakou, E., Fortunel, C., Hummel, I., and Garnier, E.: Let the concept of trait be functional!, Oikos, 116, 882–892, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x, 2007.

Voultsiadou, E., Gerovasileiou, V., Vandepitte, L., Ganias, K., and Arvanitidis, C.: Aristotle's scientific contributions to the classification, nomenclature and distribution of marine organisms, Mediterr. Mar. Sci., 18, 468–478, https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.13874, 2017.

Weiss, K. C. and Ray, C. A.: Unifying functional trait approaches to understand the assemblage of ecological communities: synthesizing taxonomic divides, Ecography, 42, 2012–2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04387, 2019.

Wichard, T., Charrier, B., Mineur, F., Bothwell, J. H., Clerck, O. D., and Coates, J. C.: The green seaweed *Ulva*: a model system to study morphogenesis, Front. Plant Sci., 6, 72, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00072, 2015.

Wieters, E. A., McQuaid, C., Palomo, G., Pappalardo, P., and Navarrete, S. A.: Biogeographical boundaries, functional group structure and diversity of rocky shore communities along the Argentinean coast, PLoS One, 7, e49725, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049725, 2012.

Womersley, H. B. S.: The marine benthic flora of southern Australia. Part I: Chlorophyta, Woolman, Government Printer, Adelaide, South Australia, ISBN 0724345523, 1984.

Womersley, H. B. S.: The marine benthic flora of southern Australia, Part II, Australian Government Printing Division, Adelaide, South Australia, 481 pp., ISBN 072436501X, 1987.

WoRMS: World Register of Marine Species: https://www.marinespecies.org, last access: 25 August 2022.