# CARGO-ACT D5.3 Recommendations for sustainable international access strategies to global RIs

Sabine Philippin, Matilde Oliveri, Jim Mather, Elisabeth Andrews

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Sabine Philippin, Matilde Oliveri, Jim Mather, Elisabeth Andrews. CARGO-ACT D5.3 Recommendations for sustainable international access strategies to global RIs. CNRS. 2025. hal-05356051

HAL Id: hal-05356051

https://hal.science/hal-05356051v1

Submitted on 9 Nov 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Deliverable 5.3: Recommendations for sustainable international access strategies to global RIs

Authors: Sabine Philippin, Matilde Oliveri, Jim Mather, Elisabeth Andrews

<table><tr><td>Work package no</td><td>WP5</td></tr><tr><td>Deliverable no.</td><td>D5.3</td></tr><tr><td>Lead beneficiary</td><td>CNRS</td></tr><tr><td>Deliverable type</td><td>X R (Document, report)<br/>☐ DEC (Websites, patent filings, videos, etc.)<br/>☐ OTHER: please specify</td></tr><tr><td>Dissemination level</td><td>X PU (public)<br/>☐ CO (confidential, only for members of the Consortium, incl. Commission)</td></tr><tr><td>Estimated delivery date</td><td>M17</td></tr><tr><td>Actual delivery date</td><td>22/08/2025</td></tr><tr><td>Version</td><td>Final</td></tr><tr><td>Reviewed by</td><td>Paolo Laj</td></tr><tr><td>Accepted by</td><td>Ewan O'Connor</td></tr><tr><td>Comments</td><td></td></tr></table>
## Contents

<table><tr><td>Executive summary</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>1. Purpose and scope</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>2. Strategic vision for international access</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3. Recommendations for a sustainable international access strategy</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>3.1 Policy and strategic consideration</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>3.2 Legal and organisational frameworks</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>3.3 Financial and operational arrangements</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>3.4 Governance and coordination mechanisms</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>4. Implementation considerations</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>5. Concluding remarks</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>6. Reference documents</td><td>14</td></tr></table>
Executive summary

This deliverable outlines strategic recommendations to support sustainable international access to global
research infrastructures (RIs), building on the work carried out under the CARGO-ACT project. It
synthesizes insights from the analysis of access practices and frameworks in Europe and the United States
(MS19 and MS20) and the development of common access principles and governance elements
(D5.1+D5.2). While focused on the atmospheric research domain, the recommendations are applicable
more broadly, building on experience from European and US infrastructures and networks, and aim to
support long-term, structured, and effective international cooperation.

Access to state-of-the-art atmospheric RIs is vital for producing the scientific knowledge needed to understand and address global environmental challenges, such as climate change, air pollution, and extreme weather. However, current access mechanisms at the international level often remain fragmented, project-based, or limited by national regulations and institutional structures. Achieving sustainable international access requires a strategic, systemic approach that accommodates the diversity of organisational models, such as the legally established RI ACTRIS ERIC in Europe, and the network-based and agency-driven approach in the US.

The report proposes a strategy based on the following aspects:

* **Policy and strategic alignment**, integrating international access into national and regional research agendas, with a strong emphasis on reciprocity, transparency, and step-wise progress from pilot initiatives to structured frameworks;

* **Legal and organisational flexibility**, including model agreements and mutual recognition of key access principles to bridge differences across governance models and regulatory frameworks;

* **Sustainable financial and operational arrangements**, supported by co-funding models such as those enabled under Horizon Europe's INFRA-SERV programme, with considerations to cost-sharing and long-term data stewardship;

* **Effective governance and coordination**, involving platforms/interfaces for exchange and coordination, performance monitoring, and regular stakeholder dialogue. Global bodies with a scientific mandate, such as the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), can play a valuable role in facilitating best practices, interoperability, data sharing, while respecting national and institutional responsibilities.

The current geopolitical context brings both opportunities and added complexity to international scientific cooperation. Despite these challenges, global collaboration, particularly the transatlantic partnership with the US, remains both strategically relevant and technically feasible. Differently phased approaches will be needed to implement international access. While short-term actions can focus on exchange of practices, pilot projects, and testing interoperability, medium-term efforts should scale successful practices, and integrate access and data policies into governance, and align data management and cost frameworks.
Long-term objectives involve establishment of durable and globally coherent mechanisms for
international access, supported by stable funding and institutional commitment.

Ultimately, sustainable international access is a strategic imperative. By fostering cooperation across borders and continents, RIs can remain resilient, relevant, and responsive to global scientific and societal needs. Maintaining access to both facilities and data across institutional and national boundaries enables reproducibility, long-term monitoring, and wider scientific use, ensuring that the outputs of international collaboration benefit the global research community.
# 1. Purpose and scope

This deliverable presents a set of strategic recommendations to support sustainable international access to global research infrastructures (RIs). It builds on previous work carried out in the CARGO-ACT project under WP5 (Strategies for enabling common access) and in particular the analysis of existing access practices in Europe and the United States (MS19), the review of associated legal and financial frameworks (MS20), and the development of common principles and access governance elements (D5.1+2).

Based on the recent work, the focus of D5.3 is to propose recommendations that can guide research infrastructures (RI) and key stakeholders including funding agencies, policymakers, research performing organisations (RPO) in establishing and maintaining a long-term, effective framework for access on a global scale, given the example of the EU and US collaborations in the atmospheric domain. High-quality and efficient access to data, facilities and services provided by atmospheric RIs is essential for advancing our understanding of complex atmospheric processes and interactions. State-of-the-art facilities in Europe and the United States (US) offer the necessary tools to carry out long-term observations and investigations of the atmosphere's critical role in regulating climate, weather, and air pollution. Facilitating access to these infrastructures supports scientific progress and the development of evidence-based responses to environmental challenges. As atmospheric phenomena transcend national borders, international collaboration, particularly through access, is indispensable for monitoring global trends and generating the scientific knowledge needed to develop solutions and address shared societal concerns.

This document discusses the strategic and structural conditions required to ensure sustainable international access. It focuses on four key dimensions of strategy and sustainability and includes policy frameworks, legal instruments, funding mechanisms, and coordination structures. While these recommendations particularly concern the context of access in the EU & US, the approaches may also provide reference points for broader global cooperation between European RIs and other international countries and partners. Access comprises both physical/remote access to facilities and related services, as well as virtual access to data and digital services. Each type of access entails distinct strategic, operational, and financial considerations, which require tailored approaches in planning, governance, and funding. For definition of access types, please, refer to the ACTRIS IMP deliverable D6.5 ACTRIS Access and Service Management Plan.

Ensuring sustainable international access therefore requires dedicated approaches to strategy, governance, interoperability, and access mechanisms and frameworks, and is a complex, step-wise process which involves short-term actions (e.g., validation of procedures and pilot cooperation), medium-term efforts (to scale and harmonize policies and operational practices), as well as long-term objectives (aiming to establish coherent, globally recognized frameworks for access to facilities and data).
## 2. Strategic vision for international access

The ability of RIs to serve international scientific communities is critical for addressing today's complex and global research challenges. Access to facilities, services, and data contributes not only to scientific excellence but also to the societal relevance and resilience of RIs. However, ensuring sustainable international access requires more than individual efforts by RIs, institutions, or short-term project goals. It requires a strategic orientation that embeds structured and coordinated access mechanisms as a core element of cooperation between institutions and countries worldwide. While Europe has historically hosted many state-of-the-art facilities, relevant infrastructures and unique environments are increasingly distributed globally, including in regions of high scientific interest or environmental sensitivity. Facilitating access for researchers, regardless of their location, to these facilities strengthens scientific collaboration and broadens the scope of research. A global access strategy must be built on shared values and practical arrangements. While scientific excellence should remain the primary criterion for access, it must be supported by legal clarity, adequate funding mechanisms, and operational compatibility. For access to data, excellence must be coupled with principles of open science, FAIR data management, and interoperability to ensure usability and trust. Long-term sustainability depends on strong institutional commitments and a solid economic model that goes beyond short-term funding cycles or individual bilateral agreements.

It is essential to recognise that RI structures for physical facilities are not equally developed or formalised across countries and continents. In Europe, access is often included within the RI operations, as in the case of ACTRIS ERIC for the atmospheric domain. In the US, access to major atmospheric research facilities is typically organised through governmental agencies, national facilities and networks, such as the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement network (ARM), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), or the Atmospheric Science and Chemistry Measurement Network (ASCENT), the latter co-funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). A global access strategy involving the US or other parts of the world must therefore be flexible enough to accommodate these diverse operational models. Reciprocity and mutual benefit between participating countries and institutions should be encouraged, supporting joint infrastructure development, in-kind contributions, joint capacity building etc. Achieving equitable access on a global level requires frameworks that are adaptable yet coherent across national and regional systems.

Access to data across international research infrastructures also presents unique challenges. Unlike physical facilities, data can be distributed, replicated, and accessed virtually, but it requires robust governance, interoperability, and long-term stewardship to ensure usability and trust. Data stewardship refers to the responsible management and oversight of data throughout its lifecycle, ensuring its quality, security, accessibility, and proper use in line with ethical and legal standards. European RIs often implement integrated data management policies, including FAIR principles and central repositories, whereas in other countries, data may be managed through national agencies, distributed networks, or project-based platforms. In the United States, these are generally also governed by FAIR principles.
some countries, national ministries or governmental authorities may establish laws, regulations, and guidelines that directly affect data sharing, privacy, and intellectual property, which must be carefully navigated in international cooperation. Effective international data strategies therefore need to reconcile these legal and operational differences, while promoting common standards, shared metadata practices, and open science principles. Reciprocity in data access can include mutual sharing of datasets, collaborative development of digital services, and joint curation or archiving initiatives. Ensuring sustainable and equitable access to data globally depends on adaptable frameworks that balance openness, usability, and long-term preservation across countries/regions.

It is important to recognise that achieving international access to both facilities and data is complex. Institutional structures, legal frameworks, funding mechanisms, and operational procedures vary widely across countries and RIs. Some aspects, such as harmonising funding models, aligning data policies with regulatory requirements, or ensuring interoperability of digital services, will be particularly challenging. Differently phased approaches can be implemented. While short-term actions can focus on pilot projects such as CARGO-ACT, or joint calls and targeted coordination actions to validate access procedures and user support, medium-term efforts can scale successful practices and integrate access and data policies into governance, and build interoperability. In the long-term, objectives should aim at establishing robust, sustainable, and globally coherent access frameworks. Some elements, including fully harmonised legal agreements or commonly acknowledged cost models, take considerable time and negotiation to implement.

This strategic vision considers the diversity of RI structures and funding models and promotes interoperability, while promoting coherence and mutual understanding between actors involved in enabling access across borders, in support of global scientific advancement.

## 3. Recommendations for a sustainable international access strategy

Building on the comparative analysis of existing practices, legal and financial frameworks, and shared access principles developed in the CARGO-ACT project, this section outlines key strategic dimensions for enabling sustainable international access to research infrastructures. The following recommendations are structured around four interlinked components: i) policy and strategic considerations, ii) legal and organisational frameworks, iii) financial and operational arrangements, and iv) governance and coordination mechanisms. These components provide the basis for a coherent approach to international access that recognises the differences in favour of the joint objective.
## 3.1 Policy and strategic consideration

Establishing a sustainable international access framework requires alignment among the policy and actors involved. Given the diversity of organisational models, i.e., research infrastructures in Europe versus a network of research facilities and/or programmes managed by governmental agencies or RPOs in the United States, corresponding policy frameworks must accommodate these differences while pursuing common goals.

Although an alignment of policies and strategies is an essential step, differences in national priorities, regulatory frameworks, and institutional mandates can bring significant challenges. Short-term actions can focus on pilot coordination and data/facility sharing. As a next step, efforts should include harmonising policies and access processes and criteria, to aim in the long-term for an establishment of durable and mutually recognised frameworks.

Integrating international access priorities into national and international research strategies and roadmaps can help facilitate sustained political and financial commitment. Such integration supports the understanding that international access is not a peripheral activity, but a core mission towards achieving scientific excellence and global collaboration. At the same time, it must be recognised that political priorities may shift over time, whereas scientific goals and needs are typically more stable. Therefore, sustainable access strategies should combine top-level alignment with practical mechanisms that can endure despite political fluctuation. Access policies and data policies should support open, transparent, and merit-based processes, while also encouraging reciprocity. In the case of data, reciprocity may involve mutual commitments to open standards, metadata quality, and shared stewardship responsibilities. Reciprocity mechanisms can take different forms, including joint funding schemes, international user quotas, or complementary contributions to infrastructure development (e.g., upgrading and sharing of facilities and equipment) and to operational support (user services and support, FAIR data management, etc.).

Strategic coordination at the international level benefits from platforms or fora where stakeholders can discuss and align policies, share best practices, harmonise access principles, and develop innovative models of cooperation. An **international coordination interface is needed** for the development of sustainable access strategies. Dedicated initiatives, such as the CARGO-ACT project, are therefore of great importance in exploring access frameworks and developing joint strategies. Global scientific organisations with a focused mandate, such as the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), are particularly well positioned to support these efforts. Within its mandate and global reach, WMO can act as an interface to facilitate the monitoring of atmospheric composition, access to observational data and information, research-to-operation initiatives, warning systems, and capacity building. While it does not directly coordinate exchange programmes or user access, its role in enabling shared standards and supporting interoperability is valuable for international collaboration.
## 3.2 Legal and organisational frameworks

The legal dimension of international access involves reconciling diverse institutional structures and regulatory environments (cf Milestone MS20). In Europe, many RIs operate as legal entities with established governance models and formal access policies. On the other hand, in the US and other world regions, access is generally governed by national programmes, research agencies, or networks that do not have such legal infrastructure status. **Legal frameworks must therefore be sufficiently flexible to enable cooperation across these varying models.** Model agreements, such as memoranda of understanding or framework contracts, can help to formalise access arrangements without imposing rigid institutional requirements and should be considered as solid bases for cooperation. These agreements provide clarity on key aspects such as user rights and responsibilities, data sharing, intellectual property, and liability, and possibly help to reduce administrative barriers and ensure smoother collaboration. Data access also raises specific issues around intellectual property rights, privacy, and long-term curation obligations, which require clarity in agreements and mutual recognition of data policies.

Legal and organisational differences between countries and institutions may complicate the mutual recognition of agreements and responsibilities. Some aspects, such as the diverse data protection laws and implications of cross-border facility use, will require a stepwise implementation process and careful negotiation to achieve broader international coherence.

At the organisational level, **clearly defined roles and responsibilities are necessary to coordinate access processes efficiently**. This includes identifying the entities responsible for managing access calls and overseeing the full user process, from application and evaluation to scheduling and operational support. Collaboration between European RIs and US research institutions typically involves complex organisational interfaces, engaging various institutional actors and structures on both sides. This requires well-structured communication channels and clearly documented procedures to streamline the access process and user engagement.

While complete policy harmonisation may not be achievable or necessary, an agreement on key principles, for example related to eligibility rules, data management, ethical standards, etc., is critical. Mutual recognition of these principles, supported by transparent information exchange, are essential to facilitate user mobility and access across systems.

## 3.3 Financial and operational arrangements

**Robust financial mechanisms are critical for enabling international access.** Funding models vary widely, reflecting the range of institutional contexts and funding mechanisms. In Europe, member states typically contribute to the operational costs of RIs, which partially also includes the provision of user access. In the US or other parts of the world, funding may come from national agencies or programmes supporting access through targeted calls or service contracts.
**Co-funding mechanisms specifically dedicated to supporting global user access are essential to ensure sustainability.** To ensure effective governance, fairness, and viability, such mechanisms should be based on mutual recognition and transparent accounting of access costs between the participating institutions, covering both financial and in-kind contributions. For data, financial sustainability includes the costs of storage, curation, updating, and providing user-friendly platforms, which may not be directly comparable to facility operations but are equally essential. A good example of targeted support to user access is the Horizon Europe "INFRA-SERV" programme. It provides targeted funding for coordination and service activities that enhance the sustainability and performance of the European RIs. International access is often explicitly encouraged, either by supporting access of non-European users to European facilities (including travel support), or by facilitating the access of European users to facilities in selected international countries (Brazil, Mexico, New Zealand, US, etc.). Such calls enable consortia to explore and develop shared governance frameworks, harmonise access policies, implement joint user support services, facilitate training and capacity building, and foster mutual access activities. INFRA-SERV projects therefore offer valuable tools to bridge institutional and policy differences between Europe and other international partners, towards the development of a more connected and global research infrastructure ecosystem.

It is important to consider that differences in funding schemes, accounting practices, and coverage of access costs including in-kind contributions can make fully harmonised cost recognition challenging. Practical approaches should prioritise achievable short-term arrangements (such as pilot co-funding as proposed by current INFRA-SERV projects) or partial cost recognition, while working toward medium- and long-term alignment of operational and data-related costs.

## 3.4 Governance and coordination mechanisms

**An established and effective governance framework is fundamental to the successful implementation of (sustainable) international access strategies.** While formal governance structures for RIs exist within Europe, transnational cooperation involving partners from the US and other world regions often requires complex, multi-layered governance models. These must respect the legal mandates and organizational frameworks of their participants and accommodate diverse institutional arrangements, without compromising the coherence of the action.

Complementary to the role of more formal intergovernmental organisations such as WMO, which facilitate the sharing of best practices for monitoring atmospheric activities, RIs and thematic networks can coordinate on access-related issues, e.g., to align policies, strategic planning, and operational processes. RIs and networks also play a key role in monitoring international access activities, collecting data on user engagement, and assessing the scientific and societal impact of international cooperation. Essential actions include coordinated monitoring of data access and use, ensuring adherence to FAIR principles, and providing evidence for the long-term value of open and interoperable data. Developing and agreeing on shared performance indicators, such as access success rates, user diversity metrics, and
scientific outputs resulting from international access, provides solid evidence to guide ongoing international developments. Transparent reporting on these indicators enhances accountability and can support the efforts for sustained funding and political support. Maintaining such coordination mechanisms, however, requires regular engagement, e.g., through joint workshops and stakeholder meetings. These efforts help foster a culture of cooperation, strengthen institutional relationships, and reinforce the overall ecosystem for international access to research infrastructures.

However, while governance structures can support alignment and transparency, practical limitations such as institutional mandates, resource constraints, and regional differences may restrict the scope of coordination. Efforts should focus first on feasible mechanisms as for example the shared monitoring and reporting of key access and data indicators. Subsequently, activities should include a progressively building of more comprehensive, multilateral frameworks.

## 4. Implementation considerations

Implementing a sustainable international access strategy requires a realistic approach, acknowledging the diversity of existing organisational models, legal frameworks, and maturity levels of international RIs and networks. An effective implementation will depend on developing practical mechanisms and involve funding opportunities while promoting reciprocity and operational alignment among stakeholders.

**In the short term,** efforts should focus on testing key access mechanisms through targeted pilot actions. Initiatives such as joint access calls can serve to validate the operational feasibility. The current HE INFRA-SERV-2025 call on atmospheric chemistry and dynamics provides a timely and unique opportunity to develop and pilot such mechanisms. This call encourages access to European RIs for users outside Europe, but also promotes collaboration with international partners, notably the US, and thus offers a concrete framework for advancing international access goals. Despite current geopolitical uncertainties, science-driven cooperation with the US remains strategically important and technically feasible. Targeted pilots under this call can contribute to developing harmonised procedures, effective co-funding models, and user-oriented support services. While providing comprehensive user access to a wide range of services, activities under this call can support the development of harmonised access procedures, user support, and co-funding schemes between the atmospheric research facilities in Europe and the US. Pilot actions should also explicitly include data sharing and governance components, testing interoperability frameworks and evaluating sustainable funding models for long-term data stewardship.

**In the medium term,** insights from these pilots should support the gradual integration of international access strategies into the governance and funding models of participating RIs and networks. Co-funding mechanisms, reciprocal access, and alignment of access and data policies can be scaled up, building on lessons learned and successful use cases. To support this process, dedicated coordination platforms or interfaces should be put in place to maintain dialogue, facilitate interoperability, and monitor progress. These would serve as flexible coordination mechanisms for collaboration and mutual alignment (without
implying the creation of a formal governing body), and could provide a basis for further discussion among
international stakeholders if stronger structures are considered in the future.

In the long term, sustainable international access should become a core component of RI planning and
operations. This may include actions such as:

- establishment of, e.g., permanent coordination fora or interfaces at the multilateral level, supported by dedicated funding and monitoring systems.

- engagement with global science bodies (e.g. WMO) and alignment with international research agendas will be key to maintaining relevance and political support.

Even in the context of evolving global dynamics, long-term cooperation with the US and other global partners can be preserved by building on technical complementarity, common standards, and shared scientific goals.

Throughout all phases, the strategy must remain flexible and iterative. Feedback from users, RI operators, and funders should help to optimize and integrate the overall framework. The implementation process should not aim for uniformity, but for convergence of practices and mutual recognition, enabling global collaboration while respecting the structural diversity of RIs and national/institutional systems.

## 5. Concluding remarks

Sustainable international access to global research infrastructures is not only a matter of operational efficiency, but a strategic imperative for advancing scientific collaboration and addressing complex global challenges related to climate change, air quality, and environmental resilience. The reflections and suggestions presented in this document offer a basis for developing more structured, equitable, and resilient international access frameworks. They are intended to foster sustained dialogue between RIs, funding agencies, and policymakers, and to support initiatives that reinforce the global relevance and interlinks with EU RIs. Ultimately, sustainable international access can be progressively embedded as a core component of RI planning and operations where feasible. This requires gradual progress, with initial actions focusing on transparency and pilot initiatives, evolving into more structured frameworks and ultimately establishing permanent coordination mechanisms supported by dedicated funding and political support. A stepwise approach is necessary, given that conditions for access are organised in very different ways between countries and institutions, due to national laws, diverse funding structures, and governance models. Convergence will require negotiation and time.

In the short term, progress can be made through improved transparency and understanding of national and institutional access models, communication of access opportunities to users, and pilot actions to test the interoperability of procedures for facility access and data sharing and, over time, demonstrate the feasibility and value of joint approaches. The early use of common key metrics (e.g., user diversity, selection criteria, access success rates, scientific outputs) can help document achievements and provide evidence for the added value of international access.
In the medium term, these experiences can be consolidated into more structured frameworks, integrated
into the governance of RIs and operational monitoring networks. This includes mutual recognition of
access costs, better alignment of data policies, implementation of FAIR principles, adoption of common
metadata standards, interoperability of facilities, etc. Such frameworks would enhance sustainability and
strengthen the societal impact of international cooperation and access.

In the long term, integrating sustainable international access into RI planning and operations should become a priority. This would require stable, structured mechanisms where countries, funding agencies, RIs and global networks can regularly meet and coordinate policies, align cost-sharing, and harmonise data standards on international access for example. To support this, a neutral international coordination interface (or facilitation mechanisms) could be envisaged to help maintain dialogue and contacts between countries/regions. Such mechanisms would need to be supported by dedicated funding streams and systematic monitoring of access and outcomes, while any move towards stronger governance structures would depend on future higher-level decisions beyond the scope of this project.

Significant challenges must be acknowledged. Sustainable reciprocity in facility access, particularly with infrastructures located outside Europe, requires not only scientific alignment, but also political commitment and financial investment. National regulations, e.g. those related to data ownership, can create constraints that are not easy to resolve, although long-term stewardship of data (storage, curation, and interoperability across scientific domains and national boundaries) will be essential for ensuring reproducibility, monitoring, and wider scientific use of RI services and outputs and support open and global science. Differences in governance structures (e.g., the European ERIC model versus US federal agencies) will require careful coordination, and unequal funding structures can make cost-sharing arrangements more complex. Maintaining political support and securing stable funding is crucial to avoid reliance solely on short-term project budgets. Organisations with a global scientific mandate, such as the WMO, can play a key role in supporting international coordination and providing neutral interfaces for cooperation across countries and regions, particularly in monitoring, data sharing, and fostering interoperability between infrastructures.

Overall, while challenges remain, the pathway outlined in this deliverable and the recommendations presented can offer a basis for developing a more structured and resilient access framework. Sustaining access to facilities and data across institutional and national boundaries remains a cornerstone of international cooperation, as it enables reproducibility, long-term monitoring, and wider scientific use of RI services and outputs.
6. Reference documents

* ACTRIS IMP Deliverable D6.5: ACTRIS Access and Service Management Plan
  https://www.actris.eu/sites/default/files/Documents/ACTRIS%20IMP/Deliverables/ACTRIS_D6_5_Access_Management_Plan.pdf

* CARGO-ACT Deliverable D5.1+D5.2: Report on common concepts, policies, and governance for access to global RIs
  https://public.lidar.fmi.fi/processing/CARGO-ACT/documents/CARGO-ACT_WP5_D5.1-D5.2_Report_oncommon_conceptpolicies_and_governance_for_access_to_global_RIs.pdf

* CARGO-ACT Milestone 19: Report on existing access practices at participating EU and US Research Infrastructures
  https://public.lidar.fmi.fi/processing/CARGO-ACT/documents/CARGO-ACT_WP5_MS19_Report_on_existing_access_practices_at_participating_EU_and_US_RIs.pdf

* CARGO-ACT Milestone 20: Report on existing legal and financial framework for access at participating EU and US RIs
  https://public.lidar.fmi.fi/processing/CARGO-ACT/documents/CARGO-ACT_WP5_MS20_Report_on_existing_legal_and_financial_framework_for_access_at_participating_EU_and_US_RIs.pdf