# Review of: ""Toupee or not Toupee?" Sic (et Non). Social perceptions of Male Pattern Baldness (Androgenetic Alopecia)"

Safi Ullah¹

1 University of Arkansas - Little Rock

Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare.

The authors have undertaken commendable work. Upon reviewing the paper, I've identified certain areas of concern.

Addressing these major and minor points can significantly enhance the paper's quality and credibility within the realm of social perceptions of male pattern baldness.

Thank you!

Safi

## Comments:

1. The study should provide additional information regarding the sample size utilized for judgments to ensure statistical significance and representativeness.

2. It's important to consider the extent to which findings can be generalized beyond the specific sample used in the research.

3. Enhancing the detail within the methodology section is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of how judgments were collected and analyzed.

4. Addressing potential biases, including cultural or personal preferences of judges, is essential for the integrity of the study.

5. The paper should discuss any ethical considerations pertaining to the use of individuals as stimuli for attractiveness judgments and other traits.