# Supplementation with rumen-protected proteins induces resistance to Haemonchus contortus in goats

Steve Ceriac, Harry Archimède, Dalila Feuillet, Yoann Felicite, Mario Giorgi, Jean-Christophe Bambou

► To cite this version:

Steve Ceriac, Harry Archimède, Dalila Feuillet, Yoann Felicite, Mario Giorgi, et al. Supplementa-
tion with rumen-protected proteins induces resistance to Haemonchus contortus in goats. Scientific
Reports, 2019, 9, pp.1-10. 10.1038/s41598-018-37800-3. hal-02625948

HAL Id: hal-02625948

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02625948

Submitted on 26 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

OPEN

# Supplementation with rumen-protected proteins induces resistance to *Haemonchus contortus* in goats

S. Cériac<fnref n="1" />, H. Archimède<fnref n="1" />, D. Feuillet<fnref n="1" />, Y. Félicité<fnref n="1" />, M. Giorgi² & J.-C. Bambou<fnref n="1" />

Received: 29 June 2018

Accepted: 11 December 2018

Published online: 04 February 2019

Resistance to gastro-intestinal nematode (GIN) in small ruminant is expected to arise from protein-rich rather than from energy-rich feeds. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the quality of the dietary proteins on the response of Creole goats to *Haemonchus contortus*. Three diets were compared: no supplementation (Hay: hay *ad libitum*), Control supplement (CS: hay *ad libitum* +2% BW of CS at 70 g of by-pass proteins/kg) and supplement enriched in rumen-protected proteins (RPP: hay *ad libitum* +2% BW of RPP at 139 g of by-pass proteins/kg). The FEC (faecal eggs counts) and the TFEC (total faecal eggs excreted/day) were significantly lower in the RPP. No difference was found between the supplemented diets for the total number of nematodes, but the RPP reduced the parasite prolificacy. The highest IgA responses were observed in animals with the highest nematode burden (Hay compared with CS diets). However, while the FEC and the TFEC were lower in animals feed with the RPP the IgA response were similar to those of the Hay. The IgA response that control GIN egg production in sheep could be one mediator of the resistance to *H. contortus* induced with by-pass proteins in goats.

Small ruminant breeding, like other livestock production systems, now faces the major challenge of increasing its output with fewer resources by environmentally-friendly practices. In addition to these constraints, internal parasites among which gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) threaten small ruminant husbandry throughout the world due to the evolution of anthelmintics resistance, the mainstay of current treatments<fnref n="1" />,². Furthermore, the recent knowledge about the environmental side-effect of anthelmintic residues and the issues of public health about chemical residues in animal products reinforce the need to develop additional control strategies for sustainable production³,⁴. Three of the most promising methods which aim at enhancing the host immune response are exploitation of genetic resistance, potentially vaccination and nutritional supplementation.

In small ruminants, numerous studies have shown that the nutritional status affects significantly the host response against GIN infection⁵. Indeed, it has been suggested that an improved nutritional status would fulfil the increasing needs in proteins and calories of the immune response for the production of immune cells, mediators and the repairing of damaged tissues to face invading pathogens⁶⁻⁸. In small ruminants, numerous studies have shown that nutrient supplementation improve either the resilience or the resistance to GIN infections⁹,¹⁰. The respective impact of metabolizable energy or proteins on the host response to GIN has long been discussed in ruminants because metabolizable energy supplementation induces metabolizable proteins supply from the ruminal microbial synthesis. Indeed, in ruminant intestinal proteins derived from both dietary proteins escaping ruminal degradation (i.e. by-pass protein) and microbial proteins synthesized in the rumen. Nonetheless, Houdijk concluded in a literature review, that it is likely that the host response would be more sensitive to moderate metabolizable protein scarcity than metabolizable energy¹¹. The poorer compatibility in term of amino acid composition of microbial proteins to the needs of the immune response compared with by-pass protein would explain this difference. Since high level of protein supplementation is not an option when production efficiency is an objective, manipulation of dietary protein that affects the quality of intestinal proteins is a key step for fine-tuning of nutritional strategies for a better control of GIN.

<footnote n="1">¹URZ, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques INRA, 97170, Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France. ²PTEA, Plateforme d'Expérimentation sur l'Animal INRA, 97170, Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.-C.B. (email: jean-christophe.bambou@inra.fr)</footnote>
<table><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Chemical composition</th><th colspan="3">Diets</th></tr><tr><th>Hay<sup>1</sup></th><th>CS<sup>2</sup></th><th>RPP<sup>3</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CP<sup>4</sup> (%)</td><td>8.1</td><td>23.3</td><td>23.3</td></tr><tr><td>DCP<sup>5</sup> (%)</td><td>5.0</td><td>18.9</td><td>19.3</td></tr><tr><td>PDIA/kg<sup>6</sup></td><td>24</td><td>70</td><td>139.3</td></tr><tr><td>PDIN/kg<sup>7</sup></td><td>66</td><td>160.9</td><td>182.8</td></tr><tr><td>PDIE/kg<sup>8</sup></td><td>51</td><td>126.5</td><td>174.5</td></tr><tr><td>FU/kg<sup>9</sup></td><td>0.6</td><td>0.98</td><td>0.99</td></tr><tr><td>RDS<sup>10</sup> (%)</td><td>—</td><td>61.1</td><td>37.8</td></tr><tr><td>RDN<sup>11</sup> (%)</td><td>49</td><td>68.3</td><td>33.5</td></tr></tbody></table>

**Table 1.** Nutritional values of the diets. ¹Hay distributed ad libitum. ²CS, Control Supplement, Hay distributed ad libitum + CS 2% of BW. ³RPP, Supplement enriched in Rumen Protected Proteins, Hay distributed ad libitum + RPP 2% of BW. ⁴CP: Crude Protein. ⁵DCP: Digestible Crude Protein. ⁶PDIA: Dietary protein undegraded in the rumen, but truly digestible in small intestine. ⁷PDIN: Amount of microbial protein that could be synthetized in the rumen from the dietary nitrogen when energy and other nutrient are not limiting factors. ⁸PDIE: Amount of microbial protein that could be synthetized in the rumen from Energy available in the rumen when nitrogen and other nutrient are not limiting factors. ⁹FU: Feed Unit (Net Energy). ¹⁰RDS starch: Rumen Degradable Starch. ¹¹RDN nitrogen: Rumen Degradable Nitrogen.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**Figure 1.** Average daily gain means (ADG) of Creole kids according to the diets (Hay¹, CS², RPP³) infected with an oral single dose of 10,000 third-larvae stage (L3) of *Haemonchus contortus* or non-infected. Different superscripts indicate differences between least square means at *P* < 0.05. ¹Hay distributed *ad libitum* non supplemented. ²CS, Control Supplement, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + CS 2% of BW. ³RPP, Supplement enriched in Rumen Protected Proteins, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + RPP 2% of BW.

## Results

**Zootechnical, nutritional and parasitological parameters.** The composition and nutritional values of the diets are shown in Table 1. In the non-infected groups the highest average daily gain (ADG) was observed for supplemented animals (CS and RPP) (Fig. 1). The ADG was higher for the animals fed with the CS diet compared with the RPP (*P* < 0.001). A significant weight loss was observed during the experimental infection for animals fed with Hay (–2.85 g/day, *P* < 0.001). No difference was observed between the infected animals in the CS and the RPP groups. However, the reduction of the ADG between infected and non-infected animals was higher in the CS group compared with the RPP (–42.4% vs. –27.3%, *P* < 0.05).

A significant effect of the supplementation was observed for 6 out of the 8 blood metabolites measured (*P* < 0.005, Table 2). Blood Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), glucose and urea were significantly higher in the CS and the RPP groups (*P* < 0.0001). In contrast, Aspartate amino-transferase (AST), Alanine amino-transferase (ALT) and Creatine kinase (CK) were significantly lower in the CS and the RPP groups (*P* < 0.05).

The amino acids composition of the duodenum-ileum contents of the animals was determined at 49 days post-infection (d.p.i.) after slaughtering (Table 3). No significant effect of the infection was observed (data not shown). The amounts (g/100 g DM) of the different amino acids were not different between the diets except for Ala and Pro which were higher in the supplemented groups (*P* < 0.05). The amounts of the total amino acids contents were also higher in the supplemented groups (*P* < 0.05). The composition (%) of the total amino acids were not different between the diets except for Asp, Thr, Glu, Tyr, Trp. Compared with RPP, the percentage of Thr and Tyr were higher in Hay and CS (*P* < 0.05). For Glu the percentage was higher in the RPP group (*P* < 0.05). The percentages of Asp were significantly higher in the CS group compared with the Hay and RPP groups (*P* < 0.05). The reverse was observed for Trp with higher percentages in the Hay and RPP groups compared with the CS groups (*P* < 0.05).
<table><caption>**Table 2.** Least square means of serum metabolites of Creole kids according to the dietary groups (Hay¹, CS², RPP³) infected or non-infected with an oral single dose of 10,000 third-larvae stage (L3) of *Haemonchus contortus*: Hay¹; CS²; RPP³. Different superscripts indicate differences between least square means at *P* < 0.05.

¹Hay distributed ad libitum. ²CS, Control Supplement, Hay distributed ad libitum + CS 2% of BW. ³RPP, Supplement enriched in Rumen Protected Proteins, Hay distributed ad libitum + RPP 2% of BW. ⁴SEM, Standard Error of the Mean. ⁵D, *P*-value of diets. ⁶T, *P*-value of the days post-infection. ⁷I, *P*-value of the infection status (infected vs non-infected). ⁸D × T × I, *P*-value of the interaction of the 3 fixed effects.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="4">Diets</th><th colspan="5">P-value</th></tr><tr><th>Hay<sup>1</sup></th><th>CS<sup>2</sup></th><th>RPP<sup>3</sup></th><th>SEM<sup>4</sup></th><th>D<sup>5</sup></th><th>T<sup>6</sup></th><th>I<sup>7</sup></th><th>D × T × I<sup>8</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Alkaline Phosphatase, U/L</td><td>125.90<sup>a</sup></td><td>317.91<sup>b</sup></td><td>396.36<sup>b</sup></td><td>37.32</td><td>0.0001</td><td>0.97</td><td>0.76</td><td>0.93</td></tr><tr><td>Gamma-Glutamyl-Transférase, U/L</td><td>36.95</td><td>42.11</td><td>36.98</td><td>3.34</td><td>0.5823</td><td>0.88</td><td>0.76</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>Aspartate Amino-Transferase, U/L</td><td>103.84<sup>a</sup></td><td>76.75<sup>b</sup></td><td>73.28<sup>b</sup></td><td>5.43</td><td>0.0009</td><td>0.93</td><td>0.82</td><td>0.38</td></tr><tr><td>Alanine Amino-Transferase, U/L</td><td>34.11<sup>a</sup></td><td>30.00<sup>b</sup></td><td>29.36<sup>b</sup></td><td>7.35</td><td>0.0122</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.19</td></tr><tr><td>Creatine Kinase, U/L</td><td>294.33<sup>a</sup></td><td>168.28<sup>b</sup></td><td>180.42<sup>b</sup></td><td>23.21</td><td>0.0016</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.88</td><td>0.43</td></tr><tr><td>Creatinine, mg/L</td><td>9.15</td><td>11.67</td><td>9.75</td><td>0.99</td><td>0.2113</td><td>0.39</td><td>0.60</td><td>0.55</td></tr><tr><td>Glucose, g/L</td><td>0.46<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.52<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.56<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.08</td><td>0.0001</td><td>0.001</td><td>0.79</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>Urea, g/L</td><td>0.34<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.55<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.52<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.09</td><td>0.0001</td><td>0.009</td><td>0.36</td><td>0.58</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>**Table 3.** Amino acids composition of the duodenum-ileum contents of Creole kids according to the diets: Hay; CS, RPP. Different superscripts indicate differences between least square means at *P* < 0.05. ¹Amino acids, g/100 g of Dry Matter (DM) and (% of the total amino acids measured). ²Hay, Hay distributed *ad libitum*. ³CS, Control Supplement, Hay distributed ad libitum + CS 2% of BW. ⁴RPP, Supplement enriched in Rumen Protected Proteins, Hay distributed ad libitum + RPP 2% of BW.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Amino Acids<sup>1</sup> g/100 g DM (% of total AA)</th><th colspan="4">Diets</th></tr><tr><th>Hay<sup>2</sup></th><th>CS<sup>3</sup></th><th>RPP<sup>4</sup></th><th>P values</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ASP</td><td>2.22 (9.6<sup>a</sup>)</td><td>2.83 (10.1<sup>b</sup>)</td><td>2.70 (9.6<sup>a</sup>)</td><td>0.13 (0.015)</td></tr><tr><td>THR</td><td>1.64 (7.1<sup>a</sup>)</td><td>1.92 (6.8<sup>a</sup>)</td><td>1.87 (6.5<sup>b</sup>)</td><td>0.49 (0.05)</td></tr><tr><td>SER</td><td>1.10 (4.7)</td><td>1.35 (4.8)</td><td>1.35 (4.8)</td><td>0.15 (0.67)</td></tr><tr><td>GLU</td><td>3.02 (13.1<sup>a</sup>)</td><td>3.76 (13.3<sup>a</sup>)</td><td>3.87 (13.8<sup>b</sup>)</td><td>0.19 (0.05)</td></tr><tr><td>GLY</td><td>1.22 (5.3)</td><td>1.44 (5.1)</td><td>1.47 (5.1)</td><td>0.41 (0.78)</td></tr><tr><td>ALA</td><td>1.24<sup>a</sup> (5.4)</td><td>1.54<sup>b</sup> (5.5)</td><td>1.58<sup>b</sup> (5.7)</td><td>0.05 (0.31)</td></tr><tr><td>VAL</td><td>1.25 (5.4)</td><td>1.51 (5.3)</td><td>1.47 (5.2)</td><td>0.38 (0.34)</td></tr><tr><td>ILEU</td><td>1.03 (4.4)</td><td>1.26 (4.4)</td><td>1.24 (4.4)</td><td>0.38 (0.88)</td></tr><tr><td>LEU</td><td>1.85 (8.0)</td><td>2.26 (7.9)</td><td>2.33 (8.2)</td><td>0.27 (0.33)</td></tr><tr><td>TYR</td><td>1.28 (5.5<sup>a</sup>)</td><td>1.50 (5.3<sup>a</sup>)</td><td>1.37 (4.8<sup>b</sup>)</td><td>0.48 (0.05)</td></tr><tr><td>PHE</td><td>1.05 (4.5)</td><td>1.32 (4.7)</td><td>1.28 (4.6)</td><td>0.19 (0.15)</td></tr><tr><td>HIS</td><td>0.53 (2.3)</td><td>0.59 (2.2)</td><td>0.69 (2.5)</td><td>0.17 (0.51)</td></tr><tr><td>LYS</td><td>1.62 (7.0)</td><td>2.14 (7.5)</td><td>2.01 (6.9)</td><td>0.26 (0.2)</td></tr><tr><td>ARG</td><td>1.09 (4.7)</td><td>1.38 (4.8)</td><td>1.37 (4.6)</td><td>0.41 (0.85)</td></tr><tr><td>PRO</td><td>1.51<sup>a</sup> (6.6)</td><td>1.81<sup>b</sup> (6.6)</td><td>1.92<sup>b</sup> (7.1)</td><td>0.05 (0.61)</td></tr><tr><td>MET</td><td>0.28 (1.2)</td><td>0.34 (1.2)</td><td>0.34 (1.2)</td><td>0.48 (0.99)</td></tr><tr><td>CYS</td><td>0.67 (2.9)</td><td>0.81 (2.9)</td><td>0.84 (3.1)</td><td>0.22 (0.68)</td></tr><tr><td>TRP</td><td>0.51<sup>a</sup> (2.2<sup>a</sup>)</td><td>0.36<sup>b</sup> (1.35<sup>b</sup>)</td><td>0.48<sup>a</sup> (1.8<sup>a</sup>)</td><td>0.01 (0.01)</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>23.1</td><td>28.1</td><td>28.2</td><td>0.05</td></tr></tbody></table>

The FEC and TFE were significantly higher in the Hay and the CS groups (Table 4, *P* < 0.05). The total number of adult nematodes (nematode burden) was significantly lower in the supplemented groups (CS and RPP, *P* > 0.05). No difference was observed between groups for the number of adult female nematodes (*P* > 0.05).

**Haematological and serological parameters.** The levels of serum pepsinogen increased significantly in all infected groups at 7 d.p.i. to reach a plateau until 28 d.p.i. (*P* < 0.05, Fig. 2). Thereafter, the levels of serum pepsinogen decreased in all groups but remained significantly higher in the non-infected groups (*P* < 0.05). No effect of the diet was observed in the infected and the non-infected groups (*P* > 0.05). In contrast, for the PCV, the hemoglobin and the mean corpuscular volume (MCV), significant interaction was observed between the diet and the infection status (infected vs. non-infected, *P* < 0.01, Fig. 3). A transitory anemia observed only in the Hay groups from 14 until 28 d.p.i. (significant decrease of PCV and hemoglobin, *P* < 0.05) was correlated with an increase of the MCV (Fig. 3). In contrast, a thrombocytopenia was observed in all the infected animals but was significantly more important in the Hay group (*P* < 0.05).
<table><caption>**Table 4.** Least squares means of the parasitological parameters of Creole kids according to the dietary groups (Hay¹, CS², RPP³) infected with an oral single dose of 10,000 third-larvae stage (L3) of *Haemonchus contortus*. Different superscripts indicate differences between least square means at *P* < 0.05. ¹Hay distributed *ad libitum* non supplemented. ²CS, Control Supplement, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + CS 2% of BW. ³RPP, Supplement enriched in Rumen Protected Proteins, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + RPP 2% of BW. ⁴FEC, back-transformed faecal eggs counts (eggs/g of faeces). ⁵TFE/day, back-transformed total excreted faecal eggs per day. ⁶Male, total adult male nematodes. ⁷Female, total adult female nematodes. ⁸Nematode burden, total adult nematodes. ⁹Prolificacy, mean number of eggs produced per female adult nematode per day.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="5">Diets</th></tr><tr><th>Hay<sup>1</sup></th><th>CS<sup>2</sup></th><th>RPP<sup>3</sup></th><th>SEM</th><th>P value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FEC<sup>4</sup></td><td>9.08<sup>a</sup></td><td>8.42<sup>a</sup></td><td>7.56<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.37</td><td>0.018<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td>TFE/day<sup>5</sup></td><td>13.46<sup>a</sup></td><td>13.06<sup>a</sup></td><td>12.02<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.17</td><td>0.013<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Male<sup>6</sup></td><td>661<sup>a</sup></td><td>211<sup>b</sup></td><td>117<sup>b</sup></td><td>345</td><td>0.013<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Female<sup>7</sup></td><td>614</td><td>329</td><td>167</td><td>368</td><td>0.082</td></tr><tr><td>Nematode burden<sup>8</sup></td><td>1276<sup>a</sup></td><td>543<sup>b</sup></td><td>296<sup>b</sup></td><td>703</td><td>0.036<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Prolificacy<sup>9</sup></td><td>3842<sup>a</sup></td><td>8296<sup>b</sup></td><td>5243<sup>a</sup></td><td>768</td><td>0.048</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Least square means of serum pepsinogen in Creole kids according to the diets (Hay¹, CS², RPP³) infected with an oral single dose of 10,000 third-larvae stage (L3) of *Haemonchus contortus* or non-infected. ¹Hay distributed *ad libitum* non supplemented. ²CS, Control Supplement, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + CS 2% of BW. ³RPP, Supplement enriched in Rumen Protected Proteins, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + RPP 2% of BW.</figcaption></figure>

The percentage of circulating lymphocytes decreased slightly but significantly in infected animals (*P* < 0.01, Fig. 4). At 35 and 49 d.p.i. the percentage of circulating lymphocytes was significantly lower in the infected animals of the Hay group compared with the other groups infected and non-infected. A significant effect of the d.p.i. was observed for the percentage of neutrophils but no effect of the diet, the infection or their interaction was observed. The percentage of circulating eosinophils was higher in the CS group whatever the infection status (*P* < 0.05). No effect of the d.p.i., the infection status or their interaction was observed (*P* > 0.05). No significant effect was observed for the percentage of circulating basophile and monocytes (data not shown, *P* > 0.05).

Following the experimental infection with *H. contortus* the levels of IgA anti-L3 and anti-ESP responses increased in all the infected animals from 7 d.p.i. to peak between 21 and 28 d.p.i., and then decreased rapidly to reach a baseline at 42 d.p.i. to the end of the infection (*P* < 0.05, Fig. 5). Infected animals in the Hay and the RPP groups had IgA responses more pronounced than those of the CS group (*P* < 0.05). The level of IgA anti-PES was higher in animals of the Hay group at 28 and 35 d.p.i. (*P* < 0.05).

## Discussion

The positive effect of nutrient supplementation on the reduction of morbidity and mortality due to GIN infection in small ruminant has been described for a long time¹,²,¹³. It is now hypothesized that host resistance to GIN is expected to arise from protein-rich rather than from energy-rich feeds¹¹. However, since most of the studies used over-feeding of proteins to show host resistance to GIN, the adoption of this strategy as a non-chemical control method is not yet feasible from an economic or an environmental point of view. A fine-tuning of protein supplementation would be on the quality in term of amino acids contents. Indeed, it has been suggested that in case of metabolizable protein scarcity the effect of the quality of the feed on the resistance to GIN was significant¹¹. Unfortunately, due to the ruminal activity, the manipulation of the amino acids profiles absorbed by the intestine is not an easy task. Indeed, in ruminants the proteins arriving in the intestine are a mix of dietary proteins that escaped from the microbial degradation in the rumen (i.e. by-pass proteins), microbial proteins synthetized from dietary amino acids and endogenous intestinal proteins¹⁴. The profile of the microbial proteins is stable, but that of by-pass proteins and the proportion of both depends on the composition of the feed¹⁵,¹⁶. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a supplement enriched in rumen-protected proteins on the resistance of
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Least square means of haematological parameters in Creole kids according to the diets (Hay¹, CS², RPP³) infected with an oral single dose of 10,000 third-larvae stage (L3) of *Haemonchus contortus* or non-infected. ¹Hay distributed *ad libitum* non supplemented. ²CS, Control Supplement, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + CS 2% of BW. ³RPP, Supplement enriched in Rumen Protected Proteins, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + RPP 2% of BW.</figcaption></figure>

Creole kid goats to *H. contortus*. Except for Glu, Tyr and Thr the profile of intestinal amino acids of animals fed with the RPP diet was not different from the CS and/or the Hay diet. Since the flow of amino acids arising from the abomasum is not homogenous over time, it is tempting to hypothesize that the delay between the slaugh- tering and the last supplement intake which was 24 h in this study, was probably too important to measure the impact of the diet on the amino acids profiles in the duodenum-ileum. In the same manner, supplementation has a significant effect on blood metabolites, with no specific effect for the RPP diet. In accordance with previous studies in ruminants, urea and glucose were higher in supplemented animals¹⁷,¹⁸. Alkaline phosphatase levels, which is an index of skeletal and antler growth in artiodactyls and associated with osteoblastic activity, were also higher in supplemented animals which showed the higher growth rate¹⁹,²⁰. Aspartate Amino-Transferase, Alanine Amino-Transferase and Creatine Kinase levels were higher in the Hay groups showing the lower growth rate for the non-infected and weight loss for the infected ones. Such results would be markers of intense liver function to meet the energy and protein requirements for maintenance and production. These enzymes have been reported to be responsible for the protein balance during the lactation peak in dairy cattle and sheep²¹⁻²³. No significant difference was observed between the Hay and the CS diets on the FEC and the TFEC. In accordance with a previ- ous study in this biological model, the CS diet induced resilience (i.e. same level of parasitism with maintenance
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Least square means of blood immune cells in Creole kids according to the diets (Hay¹, CS², RPP³) infected with an oral single dose of 10,000 third-larvae stage (L3) of *Haemonchus contortus* or non-infected.
¹Hay distributed *ad libitum* non supplemented. ²CS, Control Supplement, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + CS 2% of BW. ³RPP, Supplement enriched in Rumen Protected Proteins, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + RPP 2% of BW.</figcaption></figure>

of production and physiological parameters) rather than resistance (i.e. decreased level of parasitism together with maintenance of production and physiological parameters) to *H. contortus* infection²⁴. In the same manner, we showed that the CS diet reduced the severity and the lengthening of the regenerative anaemia and the thrombocytopenia induced by *H. contortus*.

The study showing that depletion of CD4+ T lymphocytes significantly increased the parasitic load in a resistant sheep breed was the first to demonstrate a close association between the resistance to GIN infection and the host immune response²⁵. Thereafter, significant negative phenotypic correlation has been found between blood lymphocyte counts and *H. contortus* fecundity²⁶. Our results are in accordance with a previous study in lambs showing that *H. contortus* induced lymphopenia²⁷. In contrast with a previous study in Creole goat²⁸, blood eosinophil counts were not statistically affected by the nutritional status. The high mean blood eosinophil counts in non-infected animals suggested that the one month parasite-free period was probably not enough to allow a significant decrease of the circulating eosinophils. In contrast with sheep, in goat the peripheral blood eosinophils would not play a key role in the protective response to GIN²⁵,²⁹⁻³³.

Interestingly, the FEC and the TFEC were significantly lower in the RPP diet suggesting that this diet induced resistance to the experimental *H. contortus* infection. No difference was found between the two supplemented diets (CS vs. RPP) for the total number of nematodes, but the RPP diet reduced the prolificacy of the adult female nematodes. Here, the underlying mechanisms of resistance would not control the worm population establishment but rather the prolificacy of the adult female nematodes. The IgA response has been described as the major effector mechanism that control nematode egg production in sheep³⁴,³⁵. The strong association with GIN resistance and the favourable effects on growth have suggested that parasite-specific IgA might serve as a useful marker of resistance to infection³⁶. In goats, the IgA response was positively correlated to FEC, suggesting that this response would be a marker of the level of parasitism³³,³⁷. In this study, the highest IgA responses were observed in animals with the highest nematode burden (i.e. the Hay compared with the CS diets). However, while the FEC and the
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Least square means of serological IgA response against crude extract of L3 (anti-L3) antigens and against adults *Haemonchus contortus* excretion secretion products (anti-ESP) in Creole kids according to the diets (Hay¹, CS², RPP³) infected with an oral single dose of 10,000 third-larvae stage (L3) of *H. contortus* or non-infected. ¹Hay distributed *ad libitum* non supplemented. ²CS, Control Supplement, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + CS 2% of BW. ³RPP, Supplement enriched in Rumen Protected Proteins, Hay distributed *ad libitum* + RPP 2% of BW.</figcaption></figure>

TFEC were lower in animals fed with the RPP diet the IgA response were similar to those of the Hay diet. Our data suggested that the RPP diet would improve the goat IgA response to control nematode egg production as in sheep.

## Materials and Methods

All animal care, handling techniques, procedures as well as license for experimental infection and blood sampling were approved by the current law on animal experimentation and ethics (HC-69-2014-1 from the Animal Care and Use Committee of French West Indies and Guyana), according to the certificate number A-971-18-02 of authorization to experiment on living animals issued by the French Ministry of Agriculture, before the initiation of the experiment.

**Animals and experimental design.** The experiment was conducted at the experimental unit of the INRA Antilles-Guyane research center (PTEA, Tropical Platform of the Experiment on the animal, 16°12'06.6"N 61°39'51.6"W). The Creole goats male kids (n = 48, 13.34 ± 2.4 kg body weight (BW); 4 months old) had experienced GIN infection at pasture before being randomly placed indoors in the individual pens corresponding to their experimental groups balanced according to their BW, 4 weeks before the experimental infection. The animals were drenched with levamisole (Polystrongle®, Coophavet, Ancenis, France, 8 mg/kg BW), toltrazuril (Baycox ovis®, Bayer healthcare, Lille, France, 20 mg/kg BW) and albendazole (Valbazen® 1.9%, Zoetis, Paris, France, 7.5 mg/kg BW) and then were housed under worm-free conditions. During this period, nematode faecal egg counts (FEC) remained at zero. Each animal was placed under one of 3 distinct diets (n = 16 animals/diet): Hay (Hay *ad libitum* non supplemented), CS (Hay ad libitum + 2% of the BW of Control Supplement/kids), RPP (Hay ad libitum + 2% of the BW of Supplement enriched in Rumen Protected Proteins/kids) and had free access to fresh water. The supplements (CS and RPP) were distributed to the animals in form of pellets. The composition and nutritional values of the diets is shown in Table 1. After this 4 weeks period of adaptation to the diets and the individuals pens, a total of 10 animals/diet were experimentally infected with a single oral dose of 10,000 *H. contortus* third-stage infective larvae (L3) and 6 animals/diet remain non-infected: infected (I) and non-infected
(NI) groups. The experiment was conducted for a total time of 77 days: 28 days before and 49 days after the experimental infection.

The L3 were obtained 48 days before the experimental infection from coproculture of monospecifically infected donor Creole goats with isolates previously obtained from Creole goats reared on pasture in different farms in Guadeloupe³⁸.

**Animal samples and measurements.** From the day of infection until the end of the experiment each animal was weighed weekly to adjust individually the offered quantities at 120% of the maximum intake capacity according to the BW changes and to measure individual growth rates. Blood samples were collected weekly by jugular venipuncture on each animal by using disposable syringes and 20-Ga needles in tubes containing an anti-coagulant for complete blood counts (BD Vacutainer® spray-coated K3EDTA, Becton, Dickinson and Company, New Jersey, USA) and in dry tubes for serum analysis (BD Vacutainer®, Becton, Dickinson and Company, New Jersey, USA). Blood samples were analysed by an automaton (Melet Schloesing, MS9-5s, Osny, France). The number of circulating eosinophils was determined with Malassez cell counter³⁹. Blood samples from each animal were centrifuged for 5 min. at 5000 rpm. Serum samples were then frozen at -20°C until analysis. Serum pepsinogen levels were determined according to the method of Dorny and Vercruysse⁴⁰. The biochemical parameters of the blood were determined by serum analysis (Melet Schloesing, MScan2, Osny, France). For FEC measurements during the experimental infection, approximately 10 g of faeces were collected in plastic tubes directly from the rectum of each animal, and transported from the experimental facility to the laboratory in refrigerated vials. The samples were individually analysed using a modified McMaster method for rapid determination and FEC was expressed as the number of eggs/g faeces⁴¹. The faeces were collected twice a day in collection bags that had been fitted to each animal and weighted. The total faecal eggs excreted per day (TFEC) were calculated as follows: $TFEC = FEC (eggs per gram of faeces) \times weight of total faeces excreted per animal per day (g)$. At slaughter (49 d.p.i), the contents of the abomasum of infected animals were collected individually. The abomasum was isolated with contents to determine the worm burden. The parasites were collected, counted and sorted according to the method of Bambou *et al.*⁴². We collected and lyophilized the duodenum contents in order to perform amino-grams. Dry matter was determined for each sample and amino acids were assayed by HPLC after hydrolysis with 6 N hydrochloric acid at 110 °C for 23 h. Methionine and cystine underwent performic oxidation before hydrolysis. Tryptophan was hydrolysed with barite at 110 °C for 16 h. In general, the methods used for amino acids analyses were comparable with those described by Lahaye *et al.*⁴³ or Cozannet *et al.*⁴⁴ where more details are given. The levels of IgA anti-L3 and IgA anti-ESP was measured by indirect ELISA according to Bambou *et al.* (2008). Crude extracts of *H. contortus* L3 and excretory/secretory products of adults (ESP) were prepared according to Bambou, *et al.*³⁸. In order to compare results between assays, a positive control consisting of a pool of sera containing IgA antibody was included on each plate, and OD450 of unknown samples were altered in proportion with changes of this standard. To measure the animal's ingestion and digestibility, all feed offered and refused were individually weighed and sampled. During these periods, the whole of faeces excretions were individually measured and sampled. Daily, samples were proportionally pooled and preserved. The measures were realized during periods of 5 consecutive days. These measures were repeated during 8 measurements periods.

**Statistical Analysis.** The parameters measured were analysed by a linear mixed model using the Proc Mixed of the software SAS (version 9.4 TS Level 1M3). Because of the skewed distributions, FEC, TFEC and eosinophils variables were logarithm transformed in Log (FEC + 15), Log (TFEC + 15) and log (eosinophils + 1) respectively to normalize the data. The other haematological and nutritional data were square-root-transformed to normalize residual variances. The model included fixed effects of time post-infection, diets, infection status, and the significant interaction. The comparisons between means were conducted by the least squares means procedure. The significance was fixed at $P \le 0.05$ of probability.

**Availability of Data and Material**

All data supporting the results of this study are included within this article.

**References**

1. Bishop, S. C. & Morris, C. A. Genetics of disease resistance in sheep and goats. *Small Rumin. Res.* **70**, 48–59 (2007).

2. Papadopoulos, E. Anthelmintic resistance in sheep nematodes. *Small Rumin. Res.* **76**, 99–103 (2008).

3. Beynon, S. A. Potential environmental consequences of administration of anthelmintics to sheep. *Vet. Parasitol.* **189**, 113–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.03.040 (2012).

4. Rocca, L. M., Gentili, A., Perez-Fernandez, V. & Tomai, P. Veterinary drugs residues: a review of the latest analytical research on sample preparation and LC-MS based methods. *Food Additives and Contaminants Part a-Chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment* **34**, 766–784, https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1298846 (2017).

5. Houdijk, J. G. M., Kyriazakis, I., Kidane, A. & Athanasiadou, S. Manipulating small ruminant parasite epidemiology through the combination of nutritional strategies. *Vet. Parasitol.* **186**, 38–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.044 (2012).

6. Lochmiller, R. L. & Deerenberg, C. Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: just what is the cost of immunity? *Oikos* **88**, 87–98, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880110.x (2000).

7. Adams, C. A. Nutrition-based health in animal production. *Nutrition Research Reviews* **19**, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.1079/nrr2005115 (2006).

8. Colditz, I. G. Six costs of immunity to gastrointestinal nematode infections. *Parasite Immunol.* **30**, 63–70, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3024.2007.00964.x (2008).

9. Torres-Acosta, J. F. J. *et al*. Nutritional manipulation of sheep and goats for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes under hot humid and subhumid tropical conditions. *Small Rumin. Res.* **103**, 28–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.10.016 (2012).

10. Walkden-Brown, S. W. & Kahn, L. P. Nutritional modulation of resistance and resilience to gastrointestinal nematode infection - A review. *Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences* **15**, 912–924 (2002).

11. Houdijk, J. G. M. Differential effects of protein and energy scarcity on resistance to nematode parasites. *Small Rumin. Res.* **103**, 41–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.10.017 (2012).
12. Sykes, A. R. & Coop, R. L. Interaction between nutrition and gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep. *New Zeal. Vet. J.* **49**, 222–226 (2001).

13. Walkden-Brown, S. W. & Kahn, L. P. In *International Symposium on New Challenges for Animal Science in a New Century*. 912–924.

14. Nozière, P., Sauvant, D. & Delaby, L. INRA. 2018. INRA feeding system for ruminants. *Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands*, 640 pp. (2018).

15. Clark, J. H., Klusmeyer, T. H. & Cameron, M. R. Microbial protein-synthesis and flows of nitrogen fractions to the duodenum of dairy-cows. *J. Dairy Sci.* **75**, 2304–2323, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77992-2 (1992).

16. Ouellet, D. R. et al. Effect of dietary fiber on endogenous nitrogen flows in lactating dairy cows. *J. Dairy Sci.* **85**, 3013–3025, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74387-7 (2002).

17. Stephenson, R. G. A. & Bird, A. R. Responses to protein plus energy supplements of pregnant ewes eating mature grass diets. *Aust. J. Exp. Agr.* **32**, 157–162, https://doi.org/10.1071/ea9920157 (1992).

18. Sawyer, J. E., Mulliniks, J. T., Waterman, R. C. & Petersen, M. K. Influence of protein type and level on nitrogen and forage use in cows consuming low-quality forage. *J. Anim. Sci.* **90**, 2324–2330, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4782 (2012).

19. Kie, J. G., White, M. & Drawe, D. L. Condition parameters of white-tailed deer in Texas. *J. Wildl. Manage.* **47**, 583–594, https://doi.org/10.2307/3808596 (1983).

20. Wolk, E. & Jozefczak, E. Bisoniana. 99. *Serum biochemistry of free-ranging european bison*. *Acta Theriologica* **33**, 47–56 (1988).

21. Whitaker, D. A. Interpretation of metabolic profiles in dairy cows (Reprinted from Cattle Practice). *Irish Veterinary Journal* **50**, 498–8 (1997).

22. Roubies, N. et al. Effects of age and reproductive stage on certain serum biochemical parameters of Chios sheep under Greek rearing conditions. *Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series a-Physiology Pathology Clinical Medicine* **53**, 277–281, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.2006.00832.x (2006).

23. Payandeh, S., Kafilzadeh, F., de la Fuente, M. A., Ghadimi, D. & Marin, A. L. M. Patterns of milk production, blood metabolite profile and enzyme activities of two fat-tailed sheep breeds. *Animal Production Science* **56**, 1469–1474, https://doi.org/10.1071/an141035 (2016).

24. Ceriac, S. et al. The nutritional status affects the complete blood count of goats experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. *Bmc Veterinary Research* **13** 32610.1186/s12917-017-1248-4 (2017).

25. Gill, H. S. In *Parasite Immunol. Vol. 13* 617–628 (1991).

26. Rowe, A., McMaster, K., Emery, D. & Sangster, N. Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep: Parasite fecundity correlates with worm size and host lymphocyte counts. *Vet. Parasitol.* **153**, 285–293, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.01.040 (2008).

27. Ortolani, E. L. et al. Effects of parasitism on cellular immune response in sheep experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. *Vet. Parasitol.* **196**, 230–234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.02.014 (2013).

28. Bambou, J. C. et al. Effect of dietary supplementation on resistance to experimental infection with Haemonchus contortus in Creole kids. *Vet. Parasitol.* **178**, 279–285, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.030 (2011).

29. Adams, D. B. Systemic responses to challenge infection with Haemonchus contortus in immune Merino sheep. *Vet. Res. Commun.* **17**, 25–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01839177 (1993).

30. Woolaston, R. R. et al. The value of circulating eosinophil count as a selection criterion for resistance of sheep to trichostrongyle parasites. *Int. J. Parasitol.* **26**, 123–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7519(95)00105-0 (1996).

31. Bambou, J. C. et al. Serum antibody responses in Creole kids experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. *Vet Parasitol.* **158**, 311–318 (2008).

32. Bambou, J. C. et al. Peripheral immune response in resistant and susceptible Creole kids experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. *Small Rumin. Res.* **82**, 34–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.01.008 (2009).

33. McBean, D. et al. Faecal egg counts and immune markers in a line of Scottish Cashmere goats selected for resistance to gastrointestinal nematode parasite infection. *Vet. Parasitol.* **229**, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.08.027 (2016).

34. Stear, M. J. et al. The relationship between IgA activity against 4th-stage larvae and density-dependent effects on the number of 4th-stage larvae of Teladorsagia circumcincta in naturally infected sheep. *Parasitology* **129**, 363–369, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182004005736 (2004).

35. Stear, M. J., Boag, B., Cattadori, I. & Murphy, L. Genetic variation in resistance to mixed, predominantly Teladorsagia circumcincta nematode infections of sheep: from heritabilities to gene identification. *Parasite Immunol.* **31**, 274–282, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01105.x (2009).

36. Strain, S. A. J. et al. The genetic control of IgA activity against Teladorsagia circumcincta and its association with parasite resistance in naturally infected sheep. *Parasitology* **124**, 545–552, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182002001531 (2002).

37. de la Chevrotiere, C., Bambou, J. C., Arquet, R., Jacquiet, P. & Mandonnet, N. Genetic analysis of the potential role of IgA and IgE responses against Haemonchus contortus in parasite resistance of Creole goats. *Vet Parasitol* **186**, 337–343 (2012).

38. Bambou, J. C. et al. Serum antibody responses in Creole kids experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. *Vet. Parasitol.* **158**, 311–318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.09.020 (2008).

39. Dawkins, H. J. S., Windon, R. G. & Eagleson, G. K. Eosinophil responses in sheep selected for high and low responsiveness to Trichostrongylus colubriformis. *Int. J. Parasitol.* **19**, 199–205 (1989).

40. Dorny, P. & Vercruysse, J. Evaluation of a micro method for the routine determination of serum pepsinogen in cattle. *Res. Vet. Sci.* **65**, 259–262, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-5288(98)90153-9 (1998).

41. Aumont, G., R., Pouillot & Mandonnet, N. Le dénombrement des éléments parasitaires: Un outil pour l'étude de la résistance génétique aux endo-parasites chez les petits ruminants. *In Workshop final de l'AT CIRAD-MIPA 72/94, Guadeloupe, France* (1997).

42. Bambou, J. C., Larcher, T., Cei, W., Dumoulin, P. J. & Mandonnet, N. Effect of experimental infection with Haemonchus contortus on parasitological and local cellular responses in resistant and susceptible young Creole goats. *Biomed Res Int* **902759**, 11 (2013).

43. Lahaye, L., Ganier, P., Thibault, J. N. & Seve, B. Technological processes of feed manufacturing affect protein endogenous losses and amino acid availability for body protein deposition in pigs. *Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.* **113**, 141–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.07.005 (2004).

44. Cozannet, P. et al. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in wheat distillers dried grains with solubles for pigs. *Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.* **158**, 177–186, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.04.009 (2010).

## Acknowledgements

The authors want to give thanks to the Duclos team for care and handling of the animals: C. Barbier, P.-J. Dumoulin, F. Periacarpin and C. Deloumeaux. This study was funded by the Project Agroecodiv (La Région Guadeloupe and Fonds Européens FEDER) and the INRA métaprogramme GISA (Gestion Intégrée de la Santé Animale) Project Strep (drastic and Sustainable Treatment Reduction against Parasitism in livestock). S. Cériac was supported by a doctoral fellowship from la Région Guadeloupe and the division of animal genetics of INRA.
**Author Contributions**

J.C.B. and H.A. designed the experiment. S.C. and M.G. performed the experiment. D.F., Y.F. and S.C. performed the laboratory analysis. J.C.B. performed the statistical analysis. J.C.B., H.A. and S.C. contributed to interpretation of the data and to writing the manuscript.

**Additional Information**

**Competing Interests:** The authors declare no competing interests.

**Publisher's note:** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

© The Author(s) 2019