# Safety Profile of Ibrutinib: An Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database

Marion Allouchery, Cecile Tomowiak, Thomas Lombard, Marie Christine

Perault-Pochat, Francesco Salvo

► To cite this version:

Marion Allouchery, Cecile Tomowiak, Thomas Lombard, Marie Christine Perault-Pochat, Francesco Salvo. Safety Profile of Ibrutinib: An Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2021, 12, pp.769315. 10.3389/fphar.2021.769315. hal-03514429

HAL Id: hal-03514429

https://hal.science/hal-03514429

Submitted on 6 Jan 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for
updates

# Safety Profile of Ibrutinib: An Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database

Marion Allouchery<sup>1,2,3*</sup>, Cécile Tomowiak<sup>4,5</sup>, Thomas Lombard<sup>6</sup>, Marie-Christine Pérault-Pochat<sup>1,7†</sup> and Francesco Salvo<sup>3,8†</sup>

<sup>1</sup>Pharmacologie Clinique et Vigilances, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France, <sup>2</sup>Faculté de Médecine, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France, <sup>3</sup>Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, UMR1219, Bordeaux, France, <sup>4</sup>Onco-Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France, <sup>5</sup>INSERM CIC 1402, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France, <sup>6</sup>Pharmacie à Usage Intérieur, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France, <sup>7</sup>Laboratoire de Neurosciences Expérimentales et Cliniques, INSERM, UMR1084, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France, <sup>8</sup>CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, Bordeaux, France

**OPEN ACCESS**

**Edited by:**
Elena Ramirez,
University Hospital La Paz, Spain

**Reviewed by:**
Guacira Matos,
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil
Xuefeng Bai,
The Second Affiliated Hospital of
Fujian Medical University, China

**\*Correspondence:**
Marion Allouchery
marion.allouchery@univ-poitiers.fr

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship

**Specialty section:**
This article was submitted to *Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies*, a section of the journal *Frontiers in Pharmacology*

**Received:** 01 September 2021

**Accepted:** 11 October 2021

**Published:** 28 October 2021

**Citation:**
Allouchery M, Tomowiak C, Lombard T, Pérault-Pochat M-C and Salvo F (2021) Safety Profile of Ibrutinib: An Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database. *Front. Pharmacol.* 12:769315
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.769315

As ibrutinib has become a standard of care in B-cell malignancies in monotherapy or in combination with other agents, definition of its safety profile appears essential. The aim of this study was to further characterize the safety profile of ibrutinib through the identification of potential safety signals in a large-scale pharmacovigilance database. All serious individual case safety reports (ICSRs) in patients aged ≥18 years involving ibrutinib suspected in the occurrence of serious adverse drug reactions or drug interacting from November 13th, 2013 to December 31st, 2020 were extracted from VigiBase, the World Health Organization global safety database. Disproportionality reporting was assessed using the information component (IC) and the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), with all other anticancer drugs used as the reference group. To mitigate the confounding of age, two subgroups were considered: patients aged<75 years and ≥75 years. A signal of disproportionate reporting (SDR) was defined if both IC and PRR were significant. A total of 16,196 ICSRs were included. The median age of patients was 72.9 years, 42.6% of ICSRs concerned patients aged ≥75 years, and 64.2% male patients. More than half (56.2%) of ICSRs resulted in hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. Among 713 SDRs, 36 potential safety signals emerged in ibrutinib-treated patients, mainly ischemic heart diseases, pericarditis, uveitis, retinal disorders and fractures. All potential safety signals having arisen in this analysis may support patient care and monitoring of ongoing clinical trials. However, owing to the mandatory limitations of this study, our results need further confirmation using population-based studies.

**Keywords:** ibrutinib, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, drug safety, adverse drug reaction, pharmacovigilance

**Abbreviations:** ATC, anatomical therapeutic chemical, BCR, b-cell receptor; BTK, bruton's tyrosine kinase; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; EMA, european medicines agency; FDA, US food and drug administration; IC, information component; IC025, credibility interval; ICSR, individual case safety report; IQR, interquartile range; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; MedDRA, medical dictionary for regulatory activities; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; PDGFR-β, platelet derived growth factor receptor β, PRR, proportional reporting ratio; PT, preferred term; rT3, reverse triiodothyronine; SADR, serious adverse drug reaction; SDR, signal of disproportionate reporting; SmPC, summary of product characteristics; T4, thyroxin; UMC, uppsala monitoring center; VEGF, vascular endothelium growth factor; VEGFR, vascular endothelium growth factor receptor; WHO, world health organization; WM, waldenström macroglobulinemia; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
# INTRODUCTION

Ibrutinib, a first-in-class, oral, once-daily, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has been demonstrated as an effective treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), marginal zone lymphoma and chronic graft versus host disease (Treon et al., 2015; Chanan-Khan et al., 2016; Miklos et al., 2017; Dimopoulos et al., 2018; Burger et al., 2019; Byrd et al., 2019; Moreno et al., 2019; Shanafelt et al., 2019). By targeting BTK, ibrutinib impairs B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway and inhibits B-cell proliferation, survival and migration, leading to significant prolonged survival in high-risk, relapsed or refractory diseases (Herman et al., 2011; Ponader et al., 2012).

Discrepancies in discontinuation rates due to toxicity have been highlighted between initial pivotal clinical trials and real-world studies, where adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were responsible for 51, 29, and 21% of ibrutinib discontinuations in CLL, WM and MCL respectively (Gustine et al., 2018; Mato et al., 2018; Sharman et al., 2020). Higher treatment discontinuation for safety reasons in real-world settings is likely due to differences in patient characteristics. Ibrutinib is prescribed mostly to elderly patients for whom chemo-immunotherapy is unsuitable. As a result, comorbidity burden and co-medications could compromise the safety of ibrutinib in real-life practice. In a previously published cohort study (n = 102 patients), patients aged ≥80 years were at higher risk of serious adverse drug reaction (SADR) within the first year of ibrutinib treatment (Allouchery et al., 2021).

Despite increasing use in B-cell malignancies, the post-marketing safety profile of ibrutinib remains unclear. While several studies have assessed the safety of ibrutinib in real life settings, but they have been focused on specific ADRs, such as infectious, bleeding or cardiovascular ADRs (Lipsky et al., 2015; Varughese et al., 2018; Dartigeas et al., 2019; Dickerson et al., 2019; Salem et al., 2019; Frei et al., 2020). Unlike chemotherapy, which is given for a finite number of cycles, ibrutinib is continued until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Data on long-term safety of ibrutinib are especially important in light of prolonged ibrutinib exposure but are mainly limited to clinical trial settings. In the 6-years follow-up in the phase 3 RESONATE study of relapsed/refractory CLL (n = 195 patients, median ibrutinib treatment duration of 41 months), the most commonly treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade remained consistent with previous reports of patients treated with ibrutinib, and generally decreased over time for patients remaining on ibrutinib therapy, with exceptions for hypertension and bleeding ADRs (Munir et al., 2019).

As ibrutinib has become a standard of care in B-cell malignancies in monotherapy or in combination with other agents, definition of its safety profile appears essential. The aim of this study was to further characterize the safety profile of ibrutinib through identification of potential safety signals in a large-scale pharmacovigilance database.

# MATERIALS AND METHODS

## Data Source

The Uppsala Monitoring Center (UMC) receives individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of suspected ADRs from national pharmacovigilance systems, which are stored in VigiBase, the World Health Organization (WHO) global database of ICSRs (Lindquist, 2008). In December 2020, VigiBase contained more than 24 million ICSRs from >130 countries. ADRs originate from physicians, pharmacists or other healthcare professionals, patients and pharmaceutical companies.

Each ICSR contains 1) anonymous administrative informations (reporter qualification, date of reporting, country of origin); 2) patient characteristics (sex, age); 3) description of the ADRs coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) (Brown et al., 1999), seriousness, time to onset, outcome; 4) drugs involved: international nonproprietary name and coded according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification, role in the ADRs, indication.

Per the Jardé law in France regarding research involving human participants, this study did not require ethical review or informed consent as it involved an existing anonymized database.

## Data Extraction and Selection

All serious ICSRs involving ibrutinib (ATC code: L01XE27) suspected in the occurrence of SADRs or drug interacting from November 13th, 2013 (first authorization in the United States) to December 31st, 2020 were extracted. Exclusion criteria were as follows: missing age, patient aged <18 years, no MedDRA preferred term (PT) and PT "no adverse event."

## Data Analysis

A descriptive analysis of included ICSRs was performed. Continuous variables were described by mean and standard deviation, or median and interquartile range (IQR) and categorical variables by number and proportion of subjects in each class.

Disproportionality analyses of spontaneous reporting databases are based on the identification of drug-event pairs reported more often than expected regarding the frequency of reporting of other drug-event pairs, resulting in signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) (Montastruc et al., 2011). In the present study, SDR detection was performed using the information component (IC) with its 95% credibility interval (IC<sub>0.25</sub>) and the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Specifically developed and validated by UMC, the IC is an indicator value for disproportionate reporting that compares observed and expected values, the objective being to find associations between drugs and ADRs (Bate et al., 1998). The PRR compares the rate of reporting of an event among all reports for a given drug with the rate of reporting of the same event among a control group of drugs (Evans et al., 2001). The IC and
<table><caption>**TABLE 1** | Characteristics of included individual case safety reports.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>n = 16,196</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Geographic area, n (%)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>North America</td><td>10,832</td><td>(66.9)</td></tr><tr><td>Europe</td><td>4,642</td><td>(28.6)</td></tr><tr><td>Asia</td><td>483</td><td>(3.0)</td></tr><tr><td>Oceania</td><td>145</td><td>(0.9)</td></tr><tr><td>South America</td><td>66</td><td>(0.4)</td></tr><tr><td>Africa</td><td>28</td><td>(0.2)</td></tr><tr><td>Reporter, n (%)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare professional</td><td>9,302</td><td>(57.4)</td></tr><tr><td>Non-health care professional</td><td>6,838</td><td>(42.2)</td></tr><tr><td>Missing data</td><td>56</td><td>(0.4)</td></tr><tr><td>Age, years</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Median, interquartile range</td><td>72.9</td><td>(65.0-79.1)</td></tr><tr><td>Min-max</td><td></td><td>18-99</td></tr><tr><td>Age, years, n (%)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;75</td><td>9,294</td><td>(57.4)</td></tr><tr><td>≥75</td><td>6,902</td><td>(42.6)</td></tr><tr><td>Sex, n (%)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Male</td><td>10,390</td><td>(64.2)</td></tr><tr><td>Female</td><td>5,640</td><td>(34.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Missing data</td><td>166</td><td>(1.0)</td></tr><tr><td>Seriousness criterion<sup>a</sup>, n (%)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Death</td><td>2,651</td><td>(16.4)</td></tr><tr><td>Life-threatening</td><td>613</td><td>(3.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Caused/Prolonged hospitalization</td><td>9,099</td><td>(56.2)</td></tr><tr><td>Persistent or significant disability/incapacity</td><td>201</td><td>(1.2)</td></tr><tr><td>Other medically important condition</td><td>8,177</td><td>(50.5)</td></tr><tr><td>Missing data</td><td>6</td><td>(0.0)</td></tr><tr><td>Suspected drugs, n (%)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Only ibrutinib</td><td>13,720</td><td>(84.7)</td></tr><tr><td>Ibrutinib +1 other drug</td><td>1,623</td><td>(10.0)</td></tr><tr><td>Ibrutinib + ≥2 other drugs</td><td>853</td><td>(5.3)</td></tr><tr><td>Indication, n (%)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Chronic lymphocytic leukemia</td><td>10,546</td><td>(65.1)</td></tr><tr><td>Mantle cell lymphoma</td><td>1,781</td><td>(11.0)</td></tr><tr><td>Waldenström macroglobulinemia</td><td>983</td><td>(6.1)</td></tr><tr><td>Graft versus host disease</td><td>121</td><td>(0.7)</td></tr><tr><td>Marginal zone lymphoma</td><td>92</td><td>(0.6)</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>1,346</td><td>(8.3)</td></tr><tr><td>Missing data</td><td>1,327</td><td>(8.2)</td></tr></tbody></table>

ICSR, individual case safety report; min-max, minimum-maximum.

the PRR were calculated for ibrutinib in comparison with all other anticancer drugs (ATC code: L01 “antineoplastic agents”), considering SADRs at the PT level. All other anticancer drugs were used as comparators because 1) the choice of relevant comparators for ibrutinib is complex since ibrutinib is mostly prescribed in elderly patients for whom chemo-immunotherapy is unsuitable; 2) other anticancer drugs prescribed in the same approved indications as ibrutinib, like rituximab or cyclophosphamide, are also used in a broad spectrum of indications in solid tumors or in hematological malignancies; 3) the large number of ICSRs with all other anticancer drugs allows for sufficient sensitivity to detect ibrutinib-associated safety signals. To mitigate the impact of age on safety profile of ibrutinib, two subgroups were considered: patients aged <75 years and ≥75 years. Drug-SADR associations were statistically significant if IC<sub>0.25</sub> ≥ 1, or if the lower limit of 95% confidence interval of the PRR >1, with at least 3 cases of interest

reported. A SDR was considered if both measures, i.e., IC and PRR, were significant. SDRs were then assessed carefully by two clinical pharmacologists trained in pharmacovigilance (MA, M-CP-P), according to their clinical relevance and their acknowledgment in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) (European Medicines Agency, 2021) and by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (US Food and Drug Administration, 2020). All SDRs which correspond to unexpected SADRs were classified as potential safety signals. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (v9.4, SAS Institute, NC, United States), and disproportionality analysis was performed by the UMC.

## RESULTS

### Population Characteristics

Among 806,474 patients aged ≥18 years experiencing SADRs associated with anticancer drugs, 16,196 were receiving ibrutinib.

The median (interquartile range, IQR) age of patients was 72.9 (65.0-79.1) years, 42.6% of ICSRs concerned patients aged ≥75 years, and 64.2% male patients. More than half (56.2%) of ICSRs resulted in hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, 16.4% were fatal and 3.8% were life-threatening. Ibrutinib was the only drug reported as suspected in 84.7% of ICSRs. The indication of ibrutinib treatment was available for 91.8% of ICSRs. The most frequently represented were CLL (65.1%), MCL (11.0%) and WM (6.1%). Two thirds (66.9%) of ICSRs were reported for North America and 28.6% for Europe, and 57.4% were reported by healthcare professionals (Table 1).

### Disproportionality Analyses

A total of 1,024 SDRs (713 unique drug-event pairs) were reviewed (patients aged <75 years n = 605, ≥75 years n = 419). The number and proportion of potential safety signals in each group, as well as expected SADRs, non-signals are displayed in Table 2. A total of 50 SDRs (4.9%) and 36 unique drug-event pairs were classified as potential safety signals (Table 3).

Considering cardiac disorders, significant disproportionality emerged for ischemic heart diseases and bradyarrhythmias (including conduction defects and sinus node dysfunctions), with some differences between patients aged <75 years and

<table><caption>**TABLE 2** | Number of assessed signals of proportional reporting by age group.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Assessed SDRs</th><th colspan="2">&lt;75 years<br>(n = 605)</th><th colspan="2">≥75 years<br>(n = 419)</th></tr><tr><th>n</th><th>%</th><th>n</th><th>%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Expected<sup>a</sup></td><td>323</td><td>53.4</td><td>233</td><td>55.6</td></tr><tr><td>Non-signal<sup>b</sup></td><td>250</td><td>41.4</td><td>168</td><td>40.1</td></tr><tr><td>Potential safety signal</td><td>32</td><td>5.2</td><td>18</td><td>4.3</td></tr></tbody></table>

SDR, signal of disproportionate reporting.

<footnote><sup>a</sup>ICSRs can have more than one seriousness criterion.</footnote>

<footnote><sup>a</sup>Considered well-described in the summary of product characteristics approved by the European Medicines Agency or by the US Food and Drug Administration.</footnote>

<footnote><sup>b</sup>SDRs with alternative explanations, or potentially related to the characteristics of ibrutinib-treated patients or B cell malignancies.</footnote>
<table><caption>TABLE 3 | Potential safety signals identified in VigiBase, according to age groups.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">MedDRA SOC/Sub-group SADRs</th><th rowspan="2"></th><th rowspan="2">Only ibrutinib among suspected drugs %</th><th rowspan="2">MedDRA PT</th><th colspan="3">&lt;75 years (n = 9,294)</th><th colspan="3">≥75 years (n = 6,902)</th></tr><tr><th>n</th><th>IC/IC<sub>025</sub></th><th>PRR (95%CI)</th><th>n</th><th>IC/IC<sub>025</sub></th><th>PRR (95%CI)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="12">Cardiac disorders</td><td rowspan="4">Ischemic heart diseases</td><td rowspan="4">84.5</td><td>Myocardial infarction</td><td>100</td><td>1.01/0.71</td><td>2.05</td><td>(1.68-2.50)</td><td>77</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Angina pectoris</td><td>26</td><td>1.00/0.39</td><td>2.07</td><td>(1.40-3.06)</td><td>8</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Coronary artery occlusion</td><td>11</td><td>1.26/0.28</td><td>2.61</td><td>(1.43-4.77)</td><td>11</td><td>1.41/0.44</td><td>3.16</td><td>(1.68-5.95)</td></tr><tr><td>Ischemic cardiomyopathy</td><td>4</td><td>2.02/0.28</td><td>7.13</td><td>(2.54-19.97)</td><td>2</td><td>NS</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Pericarditis</td><td rowspan="4">76.1</td><td>Pericardial effusion</td><td>81</td><td>1.83/1.50</td><td>3.75</td><td>(3.00-4.68)</td><td>53</td><td>1.77/1.35</td><td>3.96</td><td>(2.95-5.30)</td></tr><tr><td>Pericarditis</td><td>24</td><td>1.63/1.00</td><td>3.35</td><td>(2.23-5.05)</td><td>11</td><td>1.71/0.74</td><td>4.19</td><td>(2.20-8.01)</td></tr><tr><td>Cardiac tamponade</td><td>16</td><td>2.13/1.34</td><td>5.18</td><td>(3.12-8.62)</td><td>4</td><td>NS</td><td>3.23</td><td>(1.13-9.24)</td></tr><tr><td>Pericardial hemorrhage</td><td>14</td><td>3.87/3.01</td><td>47.40</td><td>(23.95-93.82)</td><td>9</td><td>2.66/1.57</td><td>14.52</td><td>(6.21-33.96)</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Bradyarrhythmia (including conduction defects and sinus node dysfunctions)</td><td rowspan="5">67.3</td><td>Sinus bradycardia</td><td>11</td><td>1.41/0.43</td><td>2.94</td><td>(1.61-5.38)</td><td>5</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Right bundle branch block</td><td>7</td><td>2.21/0.95</td><td>6.77</td><td>(3.11-14.72)</td><td>5</td><td>1.96/0.44</td><td>6.99</td><td>(2.54-19.23)</td></tr><tr><td>Sinus node dysfunction</td><td>6</td><td>2.10/0.72</td><td>6.35</td><td>(2.75-14.66)</td><td>4</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Atrioventricular block 1st degree</td><td>6</td><td>2.49/1.12</td><td>10.42</td><td>(4.41-24.60)</td><td>4</td><td>NS</td><td>5.24</td><td>(1.75-15.68)</td></tr><tr><td>Atrioventricular block 2nd degree</td><td>4</td><td>1.84/0.10</td><td>5.64</td><td>(2.04-15.65)</td><td>5</td><td>NS</td><td>3.75</td><td>(1.45-9.70)</td></tr><tr><td>Ear disorders</td><td>Hearing impairment</td><td>88.5</td><td>Deafness</td><td>21</td><td>1.27/0.59</td><td>2.55</td><td>(1.65-3.94)</td><td>31</td><td>1.54/0.99</td><td>3.32</td><td>(2.27-4.84)</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Endocrine disorders</td><td>Hypothyroidism</td><td>75.0</td><td>Thyroid hormones decreased</td><td>5</td><td>2.37/0.84</td><td>9.96</td><td>(3.90-25.46)</td><td>3</td><td>2.10/0.05</td><td>15.73</td><td>(3.52-70.28)</td></tr><tr><td>Cataract</td><td>85.7</td><td>Cataract</td><td>52</td><td>1.13/0.71</td><td>2.25</td><td>(1.71-2.96)</td><td>67</td><td>1.21/0.85</td><td>2.50</td><td>(1.94-3.22)</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Eye disorders</td><td>Uveitis</td><td>91.3</td><td>Uveitis</td><td>21</td><td>1.16/0.48</td><td>2.35</td><td>(1.52-3.64)</td><td>2</td><td>NS</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td>Glaucoma</td><td>80.8</td><td>Glaucoma</td><td>16</td><td>1.64/0.84</td><td>3.45</td><td>(2.09-5.70)</td><td>10</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Retinal disorders</td><td rowspan="3">92.9</td><td>Retinal tear</td><td>6</td><td>1.93/0.55</td><td>5.28</td><td>(2.30-12.11)</td><td>0</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td>Vitreous detachment</td><td>5</td><td>1.71/0.18</td><td>4.46</td><td>(1.80-11.01)</td><td>0</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td>Retinal vascular occlusion</td><td>4</td><td>2.65/0.91</td><td>24.63</td><td>(7.84-77.32)</td><td>0</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="10">Injury, poisoning and procedural complications</td><td rowspan="10">Fractures</td><td rowspan="10">93.4</td><td>Hip fracture</td><td>20</td><td>0.95/0.25</td><td>2.01</td><td>(1.29-3.13)</td><td>83</td><td>1.36/1.03</td><td>2.79</td><td>(2.23-3.51)</td></tr><tr><td>Spinal fracture</td><td>18</td><td>1.16/0.41</td><td>2.35</td><td>(1.47-3.76)</td><td>18</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Upper limb fracture</td><td>10</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td><td>(1.65-4.33)</td><td>19</td><td>0.83/0.11</td><td>1.89</td><td>(1.18-3.02)</td></tr><tr><td>Foot fracture</td><td>17</td><td>1.32/0.55</td><td>2.67</td><td>(1.65-4.33)</td><td>5</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Lower limb fracture</td><td>8</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td><td>(1.60-4.49)</td><td>14</td><td>1.20/0.84</td><td>2.58</td><td>(1.48-4.48)</td></tr><tr><td>Spinal compression fracture</td><td>15</td><td>1.31/0.49</td><td>2.68</td><td>(1.60-4.49)</td><td>6</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Lumbar vertebral fracture</td><td>3</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td><td>(2.04-9.42)</td><td>12</td><td>1.74/0.81</td><td>4.27</td><td>(2.29-7.93)</td></tr><tr><td>Stress fracture</td><td>7</td><td>1.79/0.53</td><td>4.39</td><td>(2.04-9.42)</td><td>0</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td>Hyponatremia</td><td>35</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td><td>(2.34-5.00)</td><td>51</td><td>0.48/0.06</td><td>1.43</td><td>(1.08-1.90)</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Psychiatric disorders</td><td rowspan="3">Depression</td><td rowspan="3">79.6</td><td>Blood sodium decreased</td><td>28</td><td>1.67/1.08</td><td>3.42</td><td>(2.34-5.00)</td><td>39</td><td>1.62/1.13</td><td>3.53</td><td>(2.51-4.95)</td></tr><tr><td>Depression</td><td>66</td><td>0.68/0.31</td><td>1.62</td><td>(1.27-2.07)</td><td>51</td><td>1.19/0.77</td><td>2.47</td><td>(1.85-3.30)</td></tr><tr><td>Depressed mood</td><td>20</td><td>1.02/0.33</td><td>2.13</td><td>(1.37-3.33)</td><td>16</td><td>1.27/0.48</td><td>2.73</td><td>(1.62-4.59)</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders</td><td rowspan="2">Pleurisy</td><td rowspan="2">82.3</td><td>Pleural effusion</td><td>247</td><td>1.63/1.44</td><td>3.21</td><td>(2.83-3.64)</td><td>221</td><td>1.48/1.29</td><td>3.08</td><td>(2.68-3.54)</td></tr><tr><td>Pleurisy</td><td>15</td><td>1.42/0.60</td><td>2.92</td><td>(1.47-4.89)</td><td>8</td><td>1.22/0.06</td><td>2.75</td><td>(1.32-5.75)</td></tr><tr><td>Vascular disorders</td><td>Arterial disorders</td><td>92.9</td><td>Aortic aneurysm</td><td>8</td><td>1.70/0.53</td><td>3.93</td><td>(1.93-8.00)</td><td>6</td><td>NS</td><td>NS</td></tr></tbody></table>

IC, information component; IC<sub>025</sub>, 95% credibility interval; MedDRA, medical dictionary for regulatory activities; NA, not applicable; NS, not significant; PT, preferred term; PRR, proportional reporting ratio; SADR, serious adverse drug reaction; SOC, system organ class; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval.
≥75 years. Only SDRs of coronary artery occlusion and right bundle branch were found in the older group, but with PRRs similar to those of patients aged <75 years. Ibrutinib was also associated with higher reporting of pericarditis (MedDRA PTs pericarditis, pericardial effusion and pericardial hemorrhage) in both age groups, even though IC and PRR reached statistical significance for cardiac tamponade only for patients aged <75 years. Similarly, regarding vascular SADRs, the SDR of aortic aneurysm was found only in the younger patients.

When focusing on respiratory disorders, a SDR of pleurisy was found for ibrutinib in comparison with other anticancer drugs in the two age groups.

A considerable number of eye disorders related to ibrutinib emerged from our analysis. Cataract was over-reported in both age groups, while uveitis, glaucoma, and retinal disorders (i.e. retinal tear, vitreous detachment and retinal vascular occlusion) were over-reported only in patients aged <75 years.

Overlap of cardiovascular, respiratory and ocular SADRs is shown in **Figure 1**.

We found potential safety signals referred to ibrutinib and fractures. Except for hip fracture, patterns of fractures differ between age groups. Ibrutinib was associated with higher reporting of hip fracture, spinal fracture, foot fracture, spinal compression fracture and stress fracture in patients aged <75 years, and upper and lower limb fractures and lumbar vertebral fracture in patients aged ≥75 years.

Other potential signals of interest were associated with ibrutinib in both age groups, especially deafness, hypothyroidism, hyponatremia and depression.

# DISCUSSION

## Main Results

We report the largest study to date on the safety profile of ibrutinib through analysis of ICSRs from the WHO pharmacovigilance database. Clinically relevant potential safety signals emerged from our analysis, with some differences between patients aged <75 years and ≥75 years: cardiovascular disorders (including ischemic heart disease, pericarditis, bradyarrhythmia and aortic aneurysm), deafness, hypothyroidism, eye disorders (including cataract, uveitis, glaucoma and retinal disorders), fractures, hyponatremia, depression and pleurisy. Potential underlying mechanisms are summarized in **Figure 2**.

## Potential Safety Signals

The cardiovascular safety profile of ibrutinib has been widely described, and includes hypertension (Dickerson et al., 2019), supraventricular arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation (Leong et al., 2016) and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (Lampson et al., 2017; Guha et al., 2018). More recently, ibrutinib-associated stroke (with/without AF/hypertension) and cardiac failure have also been listed in the European SmPC. However, our study provides new findings on ibrutinib-associated cardiotoxicity. These results show SDRs of ischemic heart diseases, e.g. myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, coronary artery occlusion and ischemic

cardiomyopathy, mostly in ibrutinib-treated patients aged <75 years. While SDRs of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris and ischemic cardiomyopathy disappeared in patients aged ≥75 years, the SDR of coronary artery occlusion still persists in this subgroup, underlining the potential role of ibrutinib. Growing evidence suggest that ibrutinib-associated cardiac toxicity may be explained by the multiple off-target effects of ibrutinib at clinically relevant concentrations. A recent structure-based drug repositioning identified ibrutinib as micromolar Vascular Endothelium Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) inhibitor (Adasme et al., 2020). Despite antiplatelet effects (Busygina et al., 2018, 2019), ibrutinib, like anti-angiogenic drugs, could produce conditions favoring hypertension and ischemic heart diseases, through the inhibition of nitric oxide formation and endothelial dysfunction (Mourad et al., 2008). Vascular Endothelium Growth Factor (VEGF) blockade may also be implicated in arterial wall injuries, leading to increased risk of artery dissections and aneurysms with antiangiogenic drugs (Oshima et al., 2017; Guyon et al., 2021). Interestingly, ibrutinib was shown to interrupt collagen fibrosis in a murine model of chronic graft-versus-host disease (Dubovsky et al., 2014). Furthermore, Wiedower et al. (2016) reported a cerebral aneurysm in a 46-year-old man treated for CLL, with spontaneous resolution after ibrutinib discontinuation, suggesting the possible direct role of ibrutinib on vascular remodeling. In addition to ibrutinib-induced hypertension, VEGF blockade may also explain the SDR of aortic aneurysm with ibrutinib in patients aged <75 years.

Our study identified bradyarrhythmias including conduction defects and sinus node function disorders, as emerging safety signals in patients aged <75 years receiving ibrutinib. In patients aged >75 years, probably due to low number of cases, only a SDR of right bundle branch was found. Conduction disorders signal over-reporting is concordant with a previous pharmacovigilance study in VigiBase evaluating the cardiovascular safety of ibrutinib (Salem et al., 2019). In a recent case-series of ibrutinib-induced high-grade heart block, 14 out of 18 cases of high degree heart block occurred within 13 months of ibrutinib initiation (Vartanov et al., 2021). All patients required pacemaker placement, and most resumed ibrutinib without recurrence of conduction disorders. It remains unclear whether or not the mechanisms that mediate ibrutinib-induced AF may be responsible for conduction disorders. Increased incidence of AF in ibrutinib-treated patients has been associated with not only with inhibition of C-terminal Src kinase (Xiao et al., 2020), but also with downregulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt pathway (McMullen et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2019). Cardiac fibrosis observed in these experimental murine models could contribute to the promotion of conduction disorders.

An association between pericardial/pleural effusions and ibrutinib has been reported in a few case-reports (Styskel et al., 2019; Miatech et al., 2020; Kidoguchi et al., 2021). This is consistent with emerging potential safety signals of pericarditis/ pleurisy in both subgroups. A SDR of pleural effusion was also found for ibrutinib in a study evaluating the risk of pleural effusion with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Mahé et al., 2018). Underlying mechanisms needs further investigation. Some
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 1** | Overlap of cardiovascular, respiratory and ocular serious adverse drug reactions associated with ibrutinib in VigiBase. (A) Overlap between ischemic heart diseases, pericarditis, bradyarrhythmia and arterial disorders. (B) Overlap between pericarditis and pleurisy. (C) Overlap between cataract, glaucoma and retinal disorders. Due to the lack of overlap with other ocular disorders, uveitis is not displayed.</figcaption></figure>

authors have suggested that tyrosine kinase inhibitors could cause serosal inflammation (pleural and pericardial effusions) by their ability to inhibit multiple targets as Platelet Derived Growth

Factor Receptor β (PDGFR-β) and Src family tyrosine kinases, which are involved in the maintenance of interstitial fluid tissue pressure and endothelial permeability (Kelly et al., 2009).

Our analysis highlights potential safety signals of ocular disorders: cataract in the two subgroups, uveitis, glaucoma and retinal ADRs (including retinal tear, vitreous detachment, retinal vascular occlusion) in patients aged <75 years. Since original studies on canine models have demonstrated corneal toxicity in animals receiving high doses of ibrutinib (US Food and Drug Administration, 2020), a concern emerged about the risk of cataract formation in ibrutinib-treated patients. Furthermore, blurred vision concerned 10% of ibrutinib-treated patients in the phase III RESONATE study (Byrd et al., 2014). Cataract was found to be one of the most commonly reported grade ≥3 adverse events in the 5-year follow-up of the phase III RESONATE study and was observed in 5.2% of patients (Burger et al., 2019). However, these results remain consistent with the background rate of cataract in the elderly (Asbell et al., 2005). Similarly, the higher reporting of glaucoma in the younger group may result from characteristics of ibrutinib-treated patients.

To date, ibrutinib-induced uveitis has been reported in only 3 case-reports (Arepalli et al., 2021; Bohn et al., 2021; Mehraban Far et al., 2021), in contrast with the 119 ICSRs documented in VigiBase. Selective pressure for Th1-mediated immunity has been proposed as a mechanism for ibrutinib-associated uveitis (Mehraban Far et al., 2021). Concerning retinal disorders, only macular edema has been previously reported with ibrutinib (Saenz-de-Viteri and Cudrnak, 2018; Mirgh et al., 2020). It is noteworthy that ibrutinib can penetrate the blood-brain barrier in mantle cell lymphoma patients (Bernard et al., 2015) and therefore reach the retina by passing through the blood-retinal barrier. Like MEK inhibitors (Huillard et al., 2014), retinal pigment epithelium toxicities may result from inhibition of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases or upregulation of aquaporins in the retinal pigment epithelium (Daruich et al., 2018).

Concomitantly with a well-known risk of fall (US Food and Drug Administration, 2020), ibrutinib was associated with higher reporting of fractures on ibrutinib in both age groups. Except for hip fracture, patterns of fractures differ between age groups. Spinal (including spinal compression), foot and stress fractures reporting was significantly increased in patients aged <75 years, while lower limb, upper limb and stress fractures significantly increased in the older group. A recent retrospective study found a higher risk of spinal fracture in ibrutinib-treated patients for CLL (Laroche et al., 2020). In contrast, some authors have suggested that ibrutinib could be a potential therapeutic agent for certain osteoclast-related diseases, such as osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Ibrutinib inhibits osteoclast differentiation and function *in vitro* by regulating the expression of osteoclast-associated genes (Shinohara et al., 2014). Moreover, in the same study, oral administration of ibrutinib was shown to protect against bone loss in a murine model of osteoporosis. It should be noted that confounders including B-cell malignancies, or risk factors of fractures (e.g., body mass index, prevalence of smoking, specific comorbidities, serum vitamin D levels, or use of medications)
<table><caption>**FIGURE 2** | Potential underlying mechanisms for ibrutinib-associated safety signals. *Including conduction defects and sinus node function dysfunctions. PDGFR-β, platelet derived growth factor receptor; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; rT3, reverse triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxin; VEGF, vascular endothelium growth factor.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>SAFETY SIGNALS</th><th>PROPOSED UNDERLYING MECHANISMS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td>Bradyarrhythmia*</td><td><ul><li>Inhibition of <b>Src</b> kinase</li><li>Downregulation of <b>PI3KT-AKT</b> pathway</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Pericarditis</td><td><ul><li>Inhibition of <b>Src</b> kinase</li><li>Inhibition of <b>PDGFR-β</b></li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Ischemic heart diseases</td><td><ul><li><b>VEGF</b> blockade</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Deafness</td><td><ul><li>Complication of otitis or haemotympanum</li><li><b>VEGF</b> blockade impacts on labyrinth vascularization</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Hypothyroidism</td><td><ul><li>Increased conversion of T4 into rT3 via type 3 deiodinase induction</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Uveitis</td><td><ul><li>Selective pressure for Th1-mediated immunity</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Retinal disorders</td><td><ul><li>Inhibition of <b>MAP kinases</b></li><li>Upregulation of aquaporins in the retinal pigment epithelium</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Cataract</td><td><ul><li>Unknown</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Glaucoma</td><td><ul><li>Unknown</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Fractures</td><td><ul><li>Inhibition of osteoclasts differentiation and function in vitro</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Hyponatremia</td><td><ul><li>Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Depression</td><td><ul><li>Unknown, ibrutinib penetrates through the blood-brain barrier</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Pleurisy</td><td><ul><li>Inhibition of <b>Src</b> kinase</li><li>Inhibition of <b>PDGFR-β</b></li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Aortic aneurysm</td><td><ul><li><b>VEGF</b> blockade</li></ul></td></tr></tbody></table>
could also affect our findings. Since BTK plays a role in bone resorption and metabolism, our results suggest a need for further assessments on the potential occurrence of fractures and osteoporosis in patients treated with ibrutinib.

Regarding endocrine and metabolic disorders, the SDR of hyponatremia is concordant with long-term safety data from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study, where hyponatremia was found to be one of the most common grade ≥3 adverse events. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment has been associated with syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, especially in patients under BCR-ABL inhibitors (Liamis et al., 2016). However, underlying mechanisms for ibrutinib-induced hyponatremia did not emerge from literature.

Nearly a dozen tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been implicated in hypothyroidism and definitive associations are known for 5 (axitinib, imatinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, and sunitinib) (Kust et al., 2016). Only one case-report described increased thyroid-hormone requirements in a thyroidectomized 80-year-old woman while on ibrutinib treatment (Mazori and Skamagas, 2021). The levothyroxine dose required to preserve a normal TSH decreased after ibrutinib discontinuation, indicating that ibrutinib-induced hypothyroidism is reversible. The authors hypothesize that the patient's hypothyroid state was caused by type 3 deiodinase induction, leading to increased conversion of thyroxine into reverse triiodothyronine.

We found that depression was more frequently reported with ibrutinib in both groups, in comparison with anticancer drugs. Only anxiety is listed in the US product information (US Food and Drug Administration, 2020). As underlined above, ibrutinib is able to pass through the blood-brain barrier, and could as a result induce psychiatrics ADRs, such as anxiety or depression.

Lastly, to the best of our knowledge, ototoxicity of ibrutinib has not been previously reported. Because of increased risk of infections (including otitis) and bleeding events (including hemotympanum) in patients treated with ibrutinib, our results should be interpreted with caution. Off-target effects of ibrutinib, in particular VEGF inhibition, may explain ibrutinib-associated deafness. Anti-VEGF agents may induce hearing loss by causing a reduction in local blood flow and/or microvascular thrombosis in the labyrinth (Dekeister et al., 2016; Cheng et al., 2019).

## Strengths and Limitations

This work has several important strengths. The present study used the world's largest and most representative spontaneous reporting database (VigiBase), which currently includes more than 124 million ICSRs from >130 countries. Reports from VigiBase represent data in the context of real-world settings, which have not been investigated in clinical trials (Bégaud and Montastruc, 2019; Montastruc et al., 2019). It used a validated method (i.e., disproportionality analysis) which was found to be able to detect unknown or rare safety signals (Montastruc et al., 2019).

From a statistical point of view, the combined use of two complementary disproportionality measures (i.e., PRR and IC) provides the most accurate estimate for drug-SADR

associations, especially for associations with few cases. Moreover, given the characteristics of ibrutinib-patients, this study was performed trying to limit confounding of age. Subgroup analyses (i.e. patients aged <75 years and ≥75 years) improve sensitivity and precision and are clearly beneficial over crude analyses in large databases (Seabroke et al., 2016; Sandberg et al., 2020).

Our study has some limitations. Underreporting is an intrinsic limitation to research performed using pharmacovigilance data. It mostly concerns less severe and/or expected adverse drug reactions (Lopez-Gonzalez et al., 2009; Alatawi and Hansen, 2017). Furthermore, González-Rubio et al. (2011) found that ADRs are more often reported for elderly patients. Therefore, the potential impact of under-reporting on this work appears to be low. The use of all anticancer drugs as the reference group should have minimized any potential indication bias, even if differences in cancer types and patient characteristics may account for the discrepancies found between the two age groups. ADR reporting comes from heterogeneous sources in VigiBase, thus raising the possibility of incomplete information for time to onset or comorbidities. Consequently, the impact of risk factors on potential safety signals cannot be ruled out. In addition, the volume of ICSRs for a specific drug may be different between countries according to its extent of use or time of registration.

## CONCLUSION

Using a large-scale pharmacovigilance database, we found clinically relevant potential safety signals in patients exposed to ibrutinib, mainly ischemic heart diseases, pericarditis, uveitis, retinal disorders and fractures. Owing to the mandatory limitations of this study, these results need further confirmation using population-based studies. However, all of these potential safety signals should be considered in patient care and in clinical trial designs.

## DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the UMC. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the authors with the permission of the UMC. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to marion.allouchery@univ-poitiers.

## ETHICS STATEMENT

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.
## AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Concept and design: MA, FS and M-CP-P. Acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data: MA, FS, and M-CP-P. Drafting of the manuscript: MA, FS and M-CP-P. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors. Supervision: FS and M-CP-P.

## REFERENCES

Adasme, M. F., Parisi, D., Van Belle, K., Salentin, S., Haupt, V. J., Jennings, G. S., et al. (2020). Structure-based Drug Repositioning Explains Ibrutinib as VEGFR2 Inhibitor. *PLOS ONE* 15, e0233089. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233089

Alatawi, Y. M., and Hansen, R. A. (2017). Empirical Estimation of Under-reporting in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). *Expert Opin. Drug Saf.* 16, 761–767. doi:10.1080/14740338.2017.1323867

Allouchery, M., Tomowiak, C., Guidez, S., Delwail, V., Delaunay, P., Lafay-Chebassier, C., et al. (2021). Patterns of Use and Safety of Ibrutinib in Real-Life Practice. *Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.* 87, 895–904. doi:10.1111/bcp.14440

Arepalli, S., Srivastava, S. K., Baynes, K., and Venkat, A. G. (2021). Panuveitis Presumed Secondary to Ibrutinib Therapy. *Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina* 52, 160–164. doi:10.3928/23258160-20210302-08

Asbell, P. A., Dualan, I., Mindel, J., Brocks, D., Ahmad, M., and Epstein, S. (2005). Age-related Cataract. *Lancet* 365, 599–609. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70803-5

Bate, A., Lindquist, M., Edwards, I. R., Olsson, S., Orre, R., Lansner, A., et al. (1998). A Bayesian Neural Network Method for Adverse Drug Reaction Signal Generation. *Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.* 54, 315–321. doi:10.1007/s002280050466

Bégaud, B., and Montastruc, J. L. (2019). Pharmacoepidemiology, the New Paradigm of Drug Evaluation. *Therapie* 74, 167–168. doi:10.1016/j.therap.2018.12.009

Bernard, S., Goldwirt, L., Amorim, S., Brice, P., Brière, J., de Kerviler, E., et al. (2015). Activity of Ibrutinib in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients with central Nervous System Relapse. *Blood* 126, 1695–1698. doi:10.1182/blood-2015-05-647834

Bohn, M., Bravo-Ljubetic, L., Lee, R. W. J., and Petrushkin, H. (2021). Ibrutinib-related Uveitis: A Report of Two Severe Cases. *Eur. J. Ophthalmol.*, 11206721211001268. doi:10.1177/11206721211001268

Brown, E. G., Wood, L., and Wood, S. (1999). The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). *Drug Saf.* 20, 109–117. doi:10.2165/00002018-199920020-00002

Burger, J. A., Barr, P. M., Robak, T., Owen, C., Ghia, P., Tedeschi, A., et al. (2019). Long-term Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Ibrutinib Treatment for Patients with CLL/SLL: 5 Years of Follow-Up from the Phase 3 RESONATE-2 Study. *Leukemia* 34, 787–798. doi:10.1038/s41375-019-0602-x

Busygina, K., Denzinger, V., Bernlochner, I., Weber, C., Lorenz, R., and Siess, W. (2019). Btk Inhibitors as First Oral Atherothrombosis-Selective Antiplatelet Drugs? *Thromb. Haemost.* 119, 1212–1221. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1687877

Busygina, K., Jamasbi, J., Seiler, T., Deckmyn, H., Weber, C., Brandl, R., et al. (2018). Oral Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Selectively Block Atherosclerotic Plaque-Triggered Thrombus Formation in Humans. *Blood* 131, 2605–2616. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-09-808808

Byrd, J. C., Brown, J. R., O'Brien, S., Barrientos, J. C., Kay, N. E., Reddy, N. M., et al. (2014). Ibrutinib versus Ofatumumab in Previously Treated Chronic Lymphoid Leukemia. *N. Engl. J. Med.* 371, 213–223. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1400376

Byrd, J. C., Hillmen, P., O'Brien, S., Barrientos, J. C., Reddy, N. M., Coutre, S., et al. (2019). Long-term Follow-Up of the RESONATE Phase 3 Trial of Ibrutinib vs Ofatumumab. *Blood* 133, 2031–2042. doi:10.1182/blood-2018-08-870238

Chanan-Khan, A., Cramer, P., Demirkan, F., Fraser, G., Silva, R. S., Grosicki, S., et al. (2016). Ibrutinib Combined with Bendamustine and Rituximab Compared with Placebo, Bendamustine, and Rituximab for Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (HELIOS): a Randomised, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study. *Lancet Oncol.* 17, 200–211. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00465-9

## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors acknowledge the UMC, which provided and gave permission to use the data (including disproportionality analyses) analyzed in the present study. The authors are indebted to the National Pharmacovigilance Centers that contributed data. The authors would like to thank Jeffrey Arsham for his help in the English editing.

Cheng, J., Wang, L., Zhu, L. N., and Wang, L. (2019). Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss Induced by Regorafenib. *J. Clin. Pharm. Ther.* 44, 963–965. doi:10.1111/jcpt.13009

Dartigeas, C., Feugier, P., Ysebaert, L., Dilhuydy, M.-S., Delmer, A., Tardy, A., et al. (2019). French Ibrutinib Observational Study (FIRE): Real-World Study of Ibrutinib Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in France. Available at: https://library.ehaweb.org/eha/2019/24th/266187/caroline.dartigeas.french.ibrutinib.observational.study.%28fire%29.real-world.html (Accessed August 12, 2021).

Daruich, A., Matet, A., Moulin, A., Kowalczuk, L., Nicolas, M., Sellam, A., et al. (2018). Mechanisms of Macular Edema: Beyond the Surface. *Prog. Retin. Eye Res.* 63, 20–68. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.10.006

Dekeister, K., Graillot, E., Durbec, M., Scoazec, J. Y., and Walter, T. (2016). Sunitinib-induced Sudden Hearing Loss. *Invest. New Drugs* 34, 792–793. doi:10.1007/s10637-016-0378-z

Dickerson, T., Wiczer, T., Waller, A., Philippon, J., Porter, K., Haddad, D., et al. (2019). Hypertension and Incident Cardiovascular Events Following Ibrutinib Initiation. *Blood* 134, 1919–1928. doi:10.1182/blood.2019000840

Dimopoulos, M. A., Tedeschi, A., Trotman, J., García-Sanz, R., Macdonald, D., Leblond, V., et al. (2018). Phase 3 Trial of Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia. *N. Engl. J. Med.* 378, 2399–2410. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1802917

Dubovsky, J. A., Flynn, R., Du, J., Harrington, B. K., Zhong, Y., Kaffenberger, B., et al. (2014). Ibrutinib Treatment Ameliorates Murine Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease. *J. Clin. Invest.* 124, 4867–4876. doi:10.1172/JCI175328

European Medicines Agency (2021). Imbruvica: EPAR - Product Information. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/imbruvica (Accessed August 23, 2021).

Evans, S. J., Waller, P. C., and Davis, S. (2001). Use of Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRRs) for Signal Generation from Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reports. *Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf.* 10, 483–486. doi:10.1002/pds.677

Frei, M., Aitken, S. L., Jain, N., Thompson, P., Wierda, W., Kontoyiannis, D. P., et al. (2020). Incidence and Characterization of Fungal Infections in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients Receiving Ibrutinib. *Leuk. Lymphoma* 61, 2488–2491. doi:10.1080/10428194.2020.1775215

González-Rubio, F., Calderón-Larrañaga, A., Poblador-Plou, B., Navarro-Pemán, C., López-Cabañas, A., and Prados-Torres, A. (2011). Underreporting of Recognized Adverse Drug Reactions by Primary Care Physicians: an Exploratory Study. *Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf.* 20, 1287–1294. doi:10.1002/pds.2172

Guha, A., Derbala, M. H., Zhao, Q., Wiczer, T. E., Woyach, J. A., Byrd, J. C., et al. (2018). Ventricular Arrhythmias Following Ibrutinib Initiation for Lymphoid Malignancies. *J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.* 72, 697–698. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.002

Gustine, J. N., Meid, K., Dubeau, T., Severns, P., Hunter, Z. R., Guang, Y., et al. (2018). Ibrutinib Discontinuation in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: Etiologies, Outcomes, and IgM Rebound. *Am. J. Hematol.* 93, 511–517. doi:10.1002/ajh.25023

Guyon, J., Gouverneur, A., Maumus-Robert, S., Bérard, X., Pariente, A., Bikfalvi, A., et al. (2021). Association between Antiangiogenic Drugs Used for Cancer Treatment and Artery Dissections or Aneurysms. *JAMA Oncol.* 7, 775–778. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0210

Herman, S. E., Gordon, A. L., Hertlein, E., Ramanunni, A., Zhang, X., Jaglowski, S., et al. (2011). Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Represents a Promising Therapeutic Target for Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Is Effectively Targeted by PCI-32765. *Blood* 117, 6287–6296. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-01-32848

Huillard, O., Bakalian, S., Levy, C., Desjardins, L., Lumbroso-Le Rouic, L., Pop, S., et al. (2014). Ocular Adverse Events of Molecularly Targeted Agents Approved in
Solid Tumours: A Systematic Review. *Eur. J. Cancer* 50, 638–648. doi:10.1016/
j.ejca.2013.10.016

Jiang, L., Li, L., Ruan, Y., Zuo, S., Wu, X., zhao, Q., et al. (2019). Ibrutinib
Promotes Atrial Fibrillation by Inducing Structural Remodeling and
Calcium Dysregulation in the Atrium. *Heart Rhythm* 16, 1374–1382.
doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.008

Kelly, K., Swords, R., Mahalingam, D., Padmanabhan, S., and Giles, F. J. (2009).
Serosal Inflammation (Pleural and Pericardial Effusions) Related to Tyrosine
Kinase Inhibitors. *Target. Oncol.* 4, 99–105. doi:10.1007/s11523-009-0110-4

Kidoguchi, K., Kubota, Y., Nishimura, Y., Sano, H., and Kimura, S. (2021).
Ibrutinib-induced Cardiac Tamponade in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
*Tjh* 38, 83–85. doi:10.4274/tjh.galenos.2020.2020.0446

Kust, D., Prpić, M., Kruljac, I., Bolanča, A., and Kusić, Z. (2016). Tyrosine Kinase
Inhibitors and Hypothyroidism - an Intriguing Link. *Endocrine Oncology and
Metabolism* 2(2), 102–113. doi:10.21040/eom/2016.2.2.3

Lampson, B. L., Yu, L., Glynn, R. J., Barrientos, J. C., Jacobsen, E. D., Banerji, V.,
et al. (2017). Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Death in Patients Taking
Ibrutinib. *Blood* 129, 2581–2584. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-10-742437

Laroche, M., Favuzeli, E., Aziza, R., and Ysebaert, L. (2020). Imputabilité de l'ibrutinib dans la survenue de fractures vertébrales multiples chez des malades traités pour leucémie lymphoïde chronique. *Revue du Rhumatisme* 87, A72. doi:10.1016/j.rhum.2020.10.119

Leong, D. P., Caron, F., Hillis, C., Duan, A., Healey, J. S., Fraser, G., et al. (2016).
The Risk of Atrial Fibrillation with Ibrutinib Use: a Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis. *Blood* 128, 138–140. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-05-712828

Liamis, G., Filippatos, T. D., and Elisaf, M. S. (2016). Electrolyte Disorders
Associated with the Use of Anticancer Drugs. *Eur. J. Pharmacol.* 777,
78–87. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.02.064

Lindquist, M. (2008). VigiBase, the WHO Global ICSR Database System: Basic
Facts. *Drug Inf. J* 42, 409–419. doi:10.1177/009286150804200501

Lipsky, A. H., Farooqui, M. Z., Tian, X., Martyr, S., Cullinane, A. M., Nghiem, K., et al. (2015). Incidence and Risk Factors of Bleeding-Related Adverse Events in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated with Ibrutinib. *Haematologica* 100, 1571–1578. doi:10.3324/
haematol.2015.126672

Lopez-Gonzalez, E., Herdeiro, M. T., and Figueiras, A. (2009). Determinants of
Under-reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions: a Systematic Review. *Drug Saf.* 32,
19–31. doi:10.2165/00002018-200932010-00002

Mahé, J., de Campaigno, E. P., Chené, A. L., Montastruc, J. L., Despas, F., and
Jolliet, P. (2018). Pleural Adverse Drugs Reactions and Protein Kinase
Inhibitors: Identification of Suspicious Targets by Disproportionality
Analysis from VigiBase. *Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.* 84, 2373–2383. doi:10.1111/
bcp.13693

Mato, A. R., Nabhan, C., Thompson, M. C., Lamanna, N., Brander, D. M., Hill, B.,
et al. (2018). Toxicities and Outcomes of 616 Ibrutinib-Treated Patients in the
United States: a Real-World Analysis. *Haematologica* 103, 874–879.
doi:10.3324/haematol.2017.182907

Mazori, A. Y., and Skamagas, M. (2021). Increased Thyroid-Hormone
Requirements Consistent with Type 3 Deiodinase Induction Related to
Ibrutinib in a Thyroidectomized Woman. *AACE Clin. Case Rep.* 7, 121–123.
doi:10.1016/j.aace.2020.11.025

McMullen, J. R., Boey, E. J., Ooi, J. Y., Seymour, J. F., Keating, M. J., and Tam, C. S. (2014). Ibrutinib Increases the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation, Potentially through Inhibition of Cardiac PI3K-Akt Signaling. *Blood* 124, 3829–3830. doi:10.1182/
blood-2014-10-604272

Mehraban Far, P., Rullo, J., Farmer, J., and Urton, T. (2021). Recurrent Uveitis Related to Ibrutinib for Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. *Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm.*, 1–4. doi:10.1080/09273948.2020.1841802

Miatech, J. L., Hughes, J. H., McCarty, D. K., and Stagg, M. P. (2020). Ibrutinib-Associated Cardiac Tamponade with Concurrent Antiplatelet Therapy. *Case Rep. Hematol.* 2020, 1–5. doi:10.1155/2020/4282486

Miklos, D., Cutler, C. S., Arora, M., Waller, E. K., Jagasia, M., Pusic, I., et al. (2017).
Ibrutinib for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Failure of Prior Therapy.
*Blood* 130, 2243–2250. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-07-793786

Mirgh, S. P., Ahmed, R., Agrawal, N., Bothra, S., Mohan, B., Garg, A., et al. (2020).
Knowing the Flip Side of the coin: Ibrutinib Associated Cystoid Macular
Edema. *Indian J. Hematol. Blood Transfus.* 36, 208–210. doi:10.1007/s12288-019-01181-y

Montastruc, J. L., Benevent, J., Montastruc, F., Bagheri, H., Despas, F., Lapeyre-Mestre, M., et al. (2019). What Is Pharmacoepidemiology? Definition, Methods, Interest and Clinical Applications. *Therapie* 74, 169–174. doi:10.1016/
j.therap.2018.08.001

Montastruc, J. L., Sommet, A., Bagheri, H., and Lapeyre-Mestre, M. (2011). Benefits and Strengths of the Disproportionality Analysis for Identification of Adverse Drug Reactions in a Pharmacovigilance Database. *Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.* 72, 905–908. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04037.x

Moreno, C., Greil, R., Demirkan, F., Tedeschi, A., Anz, B., Larratt, L., et al. (2019).
Ibrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab versus Chlorambucil Plus Obinutuzumab in
First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (iLLUMINATE): a
Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial. *Lancet Oncol.* 20, 43–56.
doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30788-5

Mourad, J. J., des Guetz, G., Debbabi, H., and Levy, B. I. (2008). Blood Pressure Rise Following Angiogenesis Inhibition by Bevacizumab. A Crucial Role for Microcirculation. *Ann. Oncol.* 19, 927–934. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm550

Munir, T., Brown, J. R., O'Brien, S., Barrientos, J. C., Barr, P. M., Reddy, N. M., et al. (2019). Final Analysis from RESONATE: Up to Six Years of Follow-Up on Ibrutinib in Patients with Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma. *Am. J. Hematol.* 94, 1353–1363. doi:10.1002/ajh.25638

Oshima, Y., Tanimoto, T., Yuji, K., and Tojo, A. (2017). Association between Aortic Dissection and Systemic Exposure of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pathway Inhibitors in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database. *Circulation* 135, 815–817. doi:10.1161/
CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025144

Ponader, S., Chen, S. S., Buggy, J. J., Balakrishnan, K., Gandhi, V., Wierda, W. G., et al. (2012). The Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor PCI-32765 Thwarts Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cell Survival and Tissue Homing *In Vitro* and *In Vivo*. *Blood* 119, 1182–1189. doi:10.1182/
blood-2011-10-386417

Saenz-de-Viteri, M., and Cuadrak, T. (2018). Bilateral Cystoid Macular Edema in a
Patient with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated with Ibrutinib. *Leuk.
Lymphoma* 60, 842–844. doi:10.1080/10428194.2018.1508673

Salem, J. E., Manouchehri, A., Bretagne, M., Lebrun-Vignes, B., Groarke, J. D., Johnson, D. B., et al. (2019). Cardiovascular Toxicities Associated with Ibrutinib. *J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.* 74, 1667–1678. doi:10.1016/
j.jacc.2019.07.056

Sandberg, L., Taavola, H., Aoki, Y., Chandler, R., and Norén, G. N. (2020). Risk Factor Considerations in Statistical Signal Detection: Using Subgroup Disproportionality to Uncover Risk Groups for Adverse Drug Reactions in VigiBase. *Drug Saf.* 43, 999–1009. doi:10.1007/s40264-020-00957-w

Seabroke, S., Candore, G., Juhlin, K., Quarcoo, N., Wisniewski, A., Arani, R., et al. (2016). Performance of Stratified and Subgrouped Disproportionality Analyses in Spontaneous Databases. *Drug Saf.* 39, 355–364. doi:10.1007/s40264-015-0388-3

Shanafelt, T. D., Wang, X. V., Kay, N. E., Hanson, C. A., O'Brien, S., Barrientos, J.,
et al. (2019). Ibrutinib-Rituximab or Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic
Lymphocytic Leukemia. *N. Engl. J. Med.* 381, 432–443. doi:10.1056/
NEJMoa1817073

Sharman, J., Kabadi, S. M., Clark, J., and Andorsky, D. (2020). Treatment
Patterns and Outcomes Among Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients Treated
with Ibrutinib in the United States: a Retrospective Electronic Medical Record
Database and Chart Review Study. *Br. J. Haematol.* 192, 737–746.
doi:10.1111/bjh.16922

Shinohara, M., Chang, B. Y., Buggy, J. J., Nagai, Y., Kodama, T., Asahara, H., et al. (2014). The Orally Available Btk Inhibitor Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) Protects against Osteoclast-Mediated Bone Loss. *Bone* 60, 8–15. doi:10.1016/
j.bone.2013.11.025

Styskel, B. A., Lopez-Mattei, J., Jimenez, C. A., Stewart, J., Hagemeister, F. B., and
Faiz, S. A. (2019). Ibrutinib-associated Serositis in Mantle Cell Lymphoma. *Am.
J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.* 199, e43–e44. doi:10.1164/rccm.201809-1738IM

Treon, S. P., Tripsas, C. K., Meid, K., Warren, D., Varma, G., Green, R., et al. (2015).
Ibrutinib in Previously Treated Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia. *N. Engl.
J. Med.* 372, 1430–1440. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1501548

US Food and Drug Administration (2020). IMBRUVICA: Label. Available at:
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/
205552s033,210563s010lbl.pdf (Accessed August 23, 2021).
Vartanov, A. R., Lampson, B. L., Jacobsen, E. D., Alyea, E. P., Moslehi, J. J., and Brown, J. R. (2021). High-grade Heart Block Associated with Ibrutinib Therapy. *HeartRhythm Case Rep.* 7, 391–394. doi:10.1016/j.hrcr.2021.03.013

Varughese, T., Taur, Y., Cohen, N., Palomba, M. L., Seo, S. K., Hohl, T. M., et al. (2018). Serious Infections in Patients Receiving Ibrutinib for Treatment of Lymphoid Cancer. *Clin. Infect. Dis.* 67, 687–692. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy175

Wiedower, E., Hare, F., Arthur, A., Chandler, J., and Martin, M. G. (2016). Unusual, Spontaneous Aneurysm Formation in a Patient Being Treated with Ibrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. *Ther. Adv. Hematol.* 7, 231–232. doi:10.1177/2040620716648563

Xiao, L., Salem, J. E., Clauss, S., Hanley, A., Bapat, A., Hulsmans, M., et al. (2020). Ibrutinib-mediated Atrial Fibrillation Due to Inhibition of CSK. *Circulation* 22, 2443–2445. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.120.049210

**Author Disclaimer:** The supplied data from VigiBase come from various sources. The likelihood of a causal relationship is not the same in all reports. The opinions and conclusions in this study are not necessarily those of the UMC or the WHO.

**Conflict of Interest:** The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

**Publisher's Note:** All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright © 2021 Allouchery, Tomowiak, Lombard, Pérault-Pochat and Salvo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.