# Inventory and multicriteria approach to identify priority commercial timber species for conservation in Benin

Jean Didier Tèwogbade AKPONA¹
Achille Ephrem ASSOGBADJO¹, ²
Adandé Belarmain FANDOHAN¹, ², ³
Romain GLÈLÈ KAKAÏ¹

¹ Université d'Abomey-Calavi
Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques
Laboratoire de Biomathématiques et
d'Estimations Forestières (UAC/FSA/LABEF)
05 BP 1752, Cotonou
Bénin

² Université d'Abomey-Calavi
Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques
Laboratoire d'Écologie Appliquée (LEA)
(UAC/FSA/LEA)
05 BP 1752, Cotonou
Bénin

³ Université d'Agriculture de Kétou
École de foresterie et ingénierie du bois
Unité de recherche en foresterie,
agroforesterie et biogéographie
BP 43, Kétou
Bénin

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /><figcaption>**Photo 1.**
Wood of *Pterocarpus erinaceus* logged in Pendjari Biosphere Reserve.
Photo J. D. T. Akpona.</figcaption></figure>
# RÉSUMÉ

## INVENTAIRE ET APPROCHE MULTICRITÈRES POUR IDENTIFIER LES ESSENCES PRIORITAIRES POUR LA CONSERVATION AU BÉNIN

Diverses essences forestières, dont certaines sont menacées, sont exploitées pour leur bois, légalement ou non. Les essences prioritaires pour la conservation à long terme doivent donc être définies. La présente étude a permis de réaliser un inventaire des essences exploitées au Bénin et d'identifier les essences prioritaires pour lesquelles des actions urgentes de conservation et de restauration sont nécessaires. Des recherches bibliographiques complétées par des entretiens avec différentes parties prenantes ont été menées afin de recueillir les données requises pour dresser une liste exhaustive des essences prioritaires. Dix critères et quatre méthodes de priorisation ont été utilisés. Au final, l'approche a retenu 10 essences parmi les 15 essences prioritaires définies par chacune des méthodes. Au total, 24 espèces végétales ont été identifiées, appartenant à 9 familles : Fabacées (25 %), Malvacées (20,83 %), Méliacées (16,67 %), Combrétacées (8,33 %), Moracées (8,33 %), Verbénacées (8,33 %), Ébénacées (4,17 %), Rutacées (4,17 %) et Myrtacées (4,17 %). Des mesures de conservation et de restauration sont préconisées d'urgence pour les 10 essences prioritaires ainsi retenues.

**Mots-clés** : essences forestières, conservation, méthodes de priorisation, Afrique de l'Ouest.

# ABSTRACT

## INVENTORY AND MULTICRITERIA APPROACH TO IDENTIFY PRIORITY COMMERCIAL TIMBER SPECIES FOR CONSERVATION IN BENIN

A variety of timber species, some of which are under threat, are targets for both legal and illegal logging. Priority timber species for long-term conservation therefore need to be defined. This study produced an inventory of timber species logged in Benin and defined priority Timber Species (TS) requiring urgent conservation and restoration measures. Data to establish an exhaustive list of TS in Benin were collected through a review of the literature and interviews with different stakeholders. Ten criteria were applied to four different prioritization methods. The top 15 species obtained with each of these methods were identified and the top 10 were shortlisted. A total of 24 plant species belonging to nine families were identified. Those most represented were: Fabaceae (25%), Malvaceae (20.83%), Meliaceae (16.67%), Combretaceae (8.33%), Moraceae (8.33%), Verbaceae (8.33%), Ebenaceae (4.17%), Rutaceae (4.17%) and Myrtaceae (4.17%). The ten top species deserve urgent conservation and restoration measures.

**Keywords:** timber species, conservation, prioritization methods, West Africa.

# RESUMEN

## INVENTARIO Y ENFOQUE MULTICRITERIO PARA IDENTIFICAR LAS ESPECIES MADERABLES COMERCIALES PRIORITARIAS PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN EN BENÍN

Diversas especies forestales, algunas de ellas en peligro, son objeto de explo-tación maderera legal e ilegal. Hay que definir las especies prioritarias para su conservación a largo plazo. Este estu-dio permitió realizar un inventario de las especies madereras explotadas en Benín y priorizar aquellas que requieren medidas urgentes de conservación y res-tauración. Se efectuó una investigación bibliográfica, completada con entrevistas a las distintas partes interesadas, a fin de recopilar los datos necesarios para elaborar una lista exhaustiva de especies prioritarias. Se utilizaron diez criterios y cuatro métodos de priorización. Al final, el enfoque permitió seleccionar 10 de las 15 especies prioritarias obtenidas con cada uno de los métodos. Se identi-ficaron un total de 24 especies vegetales pertenecientes a 9 familias: Fabáceas (25%), Malváceas (20,83%), Meliáceas (16,67%), Combretáceas (8,33%), Morá-ceas (8,33%), Verbenáceas (8,33%), Ebenáceas (4,17%), Rutáceas (4,17%) y Mirtáceas (4,17%). Se recomiendan medidas urgentes de conservación y res-tauración para las 10 especies priorita-rías seleccionadas.

**Palabras clave:** especies forestales, conservación, métodos de priorización, África Occidental.
Introduction

In several regions of the tropics, timber species are har-
vested at rates that are far beyond their rhythm of regenera-
tion. These species are preferred by people as the first interest
is timber for building material, lumber, etc. and can have other
uses for people. It was showcased that, in all International
Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) member countries, only
3.5% of permanent forest estates are sustainably managed
(ITTO, 2007). In most developing countries, untrained and
unsupervised tree fellers and skidder drivers are used for legal
and illegal logging and they often work without planned paths
of log extraction, and without financial incentives to reduce
the negative environmental impacts of their activities (ITTO,
2007). According to Putz (1991), even at low harvesting inten-
sities (e.g., < 5 trees extracted per hectare), forests lose much
of their sylviculture value due to soil damage and damage to
future crop trees, coupled with the increased livelihood of
invasion by lianas and alien species.

Benin is a moderately forested country with vegetation
dominated by savanna mosaics whereby degradation of
forests is still a major concern. According to FAO (2011), the
forest cover is estimated at 4,511,000 ha, which represents
40% of the country total area. Yet, recent investigations
show that Benin loses 50,000 hectares of natural forest in
average yearly (FAO, 2011). Illegal tree felling, land clearing
for agriculture, bushfires, charcoal production and overgra-
zing are often referred to as the main drivers of forest degra-
dation and destruction in Benin. This has resulted in decline
of the populations of many economically important indi-
genous timber species (Dimobe et al., 2014). Developing
sylvicultural packages to guide reforestation and/or forest
enrichment is necessary to ensure conservation and sustai-
nability use of these species. In Benin, several species are
used for timber and few studies have been focused on the
commercial timber species and identifying priority species

for conservation. People have developed specific choice cri-
teria for choosing timber species so that when one species
becomes rare, they move to another one more abundant.
This process negatively impacts biodiversity conservation.
Since all species cannot be focused on at once, prioritiza-
tion is necessary to select the most important species that
need urgent conservation effort. This prioritization informs
a wide array of conservation decisions and can help for
decision-making.

Establishing priorities for conservation is an obvious
and key step to designing a realistic and efficient conser-
vation strategy. According to Magos Brehm et al. (2010),
species prioritization is particularly important when the
focus is the conservation of socio-economically important
species and prioritization for conservation can be under-
taken at different levels (species, ecosystem, etc.). It allows
conservation managers to know which species are not pri-
rities and which have information gaps to be filled (Idohou
et al., 2013). Different methods of prioritization based on
range, habitat specificity and local abundance have been
described (Rabinowitz et al., 1986). There has been consid-
erable debate over which criteria should be considered when
prioritizing species for conservation (see Maxted et al.,
1997). Magos Brehm et al. (2010) proposed various criteria
and different prioritization schemes. Their methodology has
recently been used to set priorities for crop wild relatives in
Benin (Idohou et al., 2013) as well as medicinal tree species
(Yaoitcha et al., 2015). Developing an innovative prioritiza-
tion scheme and making use of the available data so as to
identify priority TS for conservation in order to establish a
national timber conservation strategy is the main goal of
this study. Two questions were asked: What is the diversity
of commercial timber species in Benin? And, which species
need urgent priority conservation at national scale? It stands
as a useful case study that establishes a national list of log-
ged timber species in Benin and highlights priority species
for conservation.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**Photo 2.**
*Ceiba pentandra* trees in Sacred Forest of Bonou.</figcaption></figure>

Photo J. D. T. Akpona.
# Materials and methods

## Study area

The study was carried out in the Republic of Benin, located between 6° N and 12°50' N and 1° E and 3°40' E in West Africa (Adomou, 2005). The study system encompasses three centres of plants endemism subdivided into ten phytogeographical districts: the Sudanian (Atacora Chain, Mekrou-Pendjari and Borgou-North districts), the Sudano-Guinean (South-Borgou, Bassila and Zou districts), the Guineo-Congolian (Coastal, Plateau, Pobè and Oueme Valley districts) (Adomou, 2005). The National flora is estimated at 2,807 species of plants divided into 1,129 genera and 185 families (Akoègninou et al., 2006). The ratio of timber species among the total number of species in the country is 8‰. Vegetation in the Guineo-Congolian centre is dominated by undifferentiated savanna mosaics, semi-diduous forests and swamp forests. *Isoberlinia*-dominated woodlands and *Acacia* and *Combretum*-dominated savannas are the major vegetation types in the Soudano-Guinean and the Sudanian centre, respectively (White, 1983). Rainfall is bimodal in the Guineo-Congolian region but tends to be unimodal in the Sudano-Guinean and Sudanian region.

Generally, mean monthly temperatures oscillate between 26 and 30°C over the country with peaks of 35°C to 40°C in the dry season upmost north (Adomou, 2005). Since 1960, forest exploitation has targeted several indigenous timber species of high economic (More than 64.600m³ for a period of 5 years) and socio-cultural value: *Milicia excelsa* (Welw.) C.C. Berg, *Triplochiton scleroxylon* K. Schum., *Khaya senegalensis* (Desv.) A. Juss., *Afzelia africana* Sm. and *Pterocarpus erinaceus* Poir. While these species are faced with local extirpation, no silviculture package (tree establishment, growth, health and quality of forests to meet diverse needs and values) has been so far developed to promote their conservation and integration into national reforestation plan (Gogan, 2010).

## Inventory of marketable timber species in Benin

The starting point for preparing a national timber conservation strategy is the inventory of logged species. First of all, a literature review was done in order to investigate the existing knowledge on species used as timber using especially the book "Flore du Bénin" (de Souza, 2008). Secondly, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions were conducted among different stakeholders (sawyers, joiners, loggers, timber traders and wood industrials) involved in the timber sector over the three biogeographical zones of Benin.

The data collection phase took place between June and October 2013. Before starting the survey, prior informed consent was obtained from local leaders in the target zones. Detailed information of the study and its importance were provided to the leaders. An exploratory survey was conducted in two districts randomly chosen in each phytochorological zone: Tanguïeta, Natitingou in the Sudanian zone; Bassila, Dassa in the Sudano-Guinean zone and Aplahoué,

Zogbodomey in the Guineo-Congolian zone. In each zone, 140 informants were asked if they are involved in the timber sector. The proportion (p) of positive answers was used to compute the numbers (n) of the individuals to be surveyed following Dagnelie (1998):

$$n = \frac{U_{1-\alpha/2}^2 \times p(1-p)}{d^2}$$

Where n is the sample size considered in the phytodistrict, p is the proportion of stakeholders or interviewees that were involved in logging. The interviewees were asked if they are involved in logging.

* U is the value of the Normal random variable at probability value of $1 - \alpha/2$.

* For a probability value of 0.975 (or $\alpha = 0.05$), $U_{1-\alpha/2} \approx 1.96$;

* d is the margin of error of the estimation of any parameter to be computed from the survey and a value of 5% was considered.

At the end, in order to have only one sample size, one proportion was considered by putting together the answers from each phytochorological zone. By computing with the formula above, the number of informants randomly considered for all the phytodistricts was 650.

In each biogeographical zone, the informants were asked to list all timber species used as well as their specific usage types apart for timber. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted orally with, sometimes, the assistance of a local translator. Different demographic parameters (gender, age, education, ethnicity, etc.) were collected before the listing of timber species.

## Setting priorities for timber species conservation

The process of establishing priorities among a set of species is a first step in any conservation strategy (Maxted and Kell, 2009ab). The criteria used for the prioritization were adapted from those proposed by Magos Brehm et al. (2010) and used by Idohou et al. (2013). Ten criteria were used and described in the current study (table I).

## Prioritization approach

Four different methods of combining the above mentioned ten criteria (figure 1) were adapted from Magos Brehm et al. (2010) and Idohou et al. (2013): point scoring procedure (PSP), point scoring procedure with weighting (PSPW), compound ranking system (CRS) and binomial ranking system (BRS).

In the PSP, the priority value of each reported species was computed as follows:

$$ \text{Score1} = \sum (\text{native status} + \text{economic importance} + \text{ethnobotanical value} + \text{knowledge of technical routes} + \text{conservation status} + \text{global distribution} + \text{plasticity} + \text{legislation} + \text{international threat status} + \text{national threat status}) $$
<table><caption>**Table I.**
Criteria used for establishment of priority timber species for conservation with their different levels or modalities.</caption><thead><tr><td>Criteria</td><td>Description</td><td>Modalities</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Origin of the species</td><td>Since the inventory has native, introduced and unknown/doubtful origin species, priority was given to species belonging to the natural flora of Benin (indigenous species).</td><td>Three modalities were considered: (a) indigenous, (b) introduced, (c) No data/doubt.</td></tr><tr><td>Economic importance</td><td>We collected information from forest administration on the cubage meters of each species exploited and the list of species used at local, national, regional and international market.</td><td>Four levels were considered: local, regional, national and international. Priority was given to the species having higher economic importance.</td></tr><tr><td>Ethnobotanical value</td><td>This was assessed through local knowledge on the uses of the species. Priority was given to the species having higher importance for local people in the number of uses listed.</td><td>The categories considered: (a) 1 use, (b) 2 uses, (c) 3 uses, (d) 4 uses, (e) 5 uses, (f) 6 uses, (g) 7 uses, (h) 8 uses, (i) No data.</td></tr><tr><td>Knowledge of technical routes of production</td><td>Introduction of native species in reforestation plan requires a strong knowledge of germination and seedling growth. Priority was given to species with no silviculture package.</td><td>Two categories were considered: (a) silviculture known, (b) silviculture not known.</td></tr><tr><td>Global distribution</td><td>Priority decreases with larger distribution; therefore, nationally- or regionally- restricted species (or endemics) were given more priority than species occurring worldwide.</td><td>The categories considered were the distribution at the level of: (a) Est Africa/West Africa/North/South/Center, (b) Throughout Africa, (c) World, (d) No data.</td></tr><tr><td>National distribution</td><td>A species occurring in a few provinces and in a few ecological conditions was considered rarer than a species occurring throughout the country and can be established in different ecological conditions.</td><td>Flora of Benin was used. These level were considered (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, (d) 4, (e) 5, (f) 6, (g) 7, (h) 8, (i) 9, (j) 10, (k) No data.</td></tr><tr><td>Conservation status</td><td>The existing conservation strategy or not were considered. Data were collected from thesis, books and articles.</td><td>The categories concerned were: (a) conservation Protected (b) Non protected.</td></tr><tr><td>Legislation</td><td>Priorities for conservation are given to species listed in national/international legislation (Magos Brehm et al., 2010).</td><td>The categories are: (a) Decree N°96-271 of 2 July 1996 of the Law 93-009 related to forest regime in Republic of Benin, (b) international convention CITES, (c) No data.</td></tr><tr><td>Threats assessments</td><td>IUCN Red List as well as Benin Red List of threatened species were used.</td><td>The categories are: (a) EN, (b) NE, (c) VU, (d) LC, (e) NT, (f) NF.</td></tr></tbody></table>

This methodology was adapted from Bhrem *et al.* (2010) and Idohou *et al.* (2013).

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.**
Methodology used for establishing conservation priorities for timber species in Benin, Adapted from Magos Brehm *et al.* (2010).</figcaption></figure>
The above formula was combined with specific weight (Magos Brehm et al., 2010) for each criterion to get the PSPW approach:

$$
\text{Score2} = \sum \{0.15(\text{native status}) + 0.075 (\text{economic importance}) + 0.05 (\text{ethnobotanical value}) + 0.075 (\text{knowledge of technical routes}) + 0.1 (\text{conservation status}) + 0.15 (\text{global distribution}) + 0.1 (\text{plasticity}) + 0.1 (\text{legislation}) + 0.1 (\text{international threatened status}) + 0.1 (\text{national threatened status})\}
$$

For the CRS approach, the rank varied between 1 to n
(number of the criterion).

The total ranking is obtained by summing individual
ranks of each criterion (see Magos Brehm *et al.*, 2010).

$$
\text{Total rank} = \sum_{i}^{n} = \alpha R\beta
$$

$\alpha$ represent the coefficient of the rank ($R$) and $\beta$ represent the index of the rank.

From this ranking perceptive, we could not derive prio-
rities species. So, we got scores from those ranks as follows:
Score3 = (α1*β1) + (α2*β2) + ... + (αn*βn)

Considering the score rank by each species, priorities
were given to decreasing value of the score.

For the BRS method, binomial approach was used with
value 1 if the criterion is verified and 0 otherwise. The score
is obtained as follows:

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.**
Percentage of respondents involved in the activity.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.**
Number of commercial timber species per family in Benin.</figcaption></figure>

$$
\text{Score4} = \sum (\text{native status} + \text{economic importance} + \text{ethnobotanical value} + \text{knowledge of technical routes} + \text{conservation status} + \text{global distribution} + \text{plasticity} + \text{legislation} + \text{international threat status} + \text{national threat status})
$$

Using the abovementioned different approaches, the
top 15 selected species were the same across the four prior-
itization methods with the same ranking (PSP, PSPW, CRS
and BRS). To identify the most important timber species for
conservation in Benin, the new score was affected to each
species in each method used by order of appearing of each
species in each of the methods.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of interviewees

The interviewees were mostly men (96.43%). A categorization of surveyed people according to age, educational level and seniority showed that all interviewees are mostly adults (81.43%); and their level of education range from primary (10.38%) to secondary school (69.29%). There were two main groups in terms of seniority in the timber sector, namely: those who have been involved for less than ten years (46.43%), and those who have been involved over ten years (14.29%). A total of 18 socio-cultural groups were represented with the top three being Fon (28.57%), Nago (13.57%) and Bariba (12.15%). Surveyed people were mainly from five specialties (profession): sawyers, joiners, wood industry, logger, timber traders (figure 2).

Priority timber species for active
conservation

Twenty four species belonging to nine
families were recorded. The three most repre-
sented families are the Fabaceae (25%) with
six species: *A. africana*, *Daniellia oliveri* (Rolfe)
Hutch. & Dalz., *Isoberlinia doka* Craib & Stapf,
*Isoberlinia tomentosa* (Harms) Craib & Stapf.,
*Prosopis africana* Guill. et Perr., *P. erinaceus*;
Malvaceae (20.83%), five species: *Bombax
costatum* Pellegr. & Vuillet., *Ceiba pentan-
dra* (L.) Gaertn., *Cola cordifolia* (Cav.) R. Br.,
*Cola gigantean* A. Chev., *T. scleroxylon* and
Meliaceae (16.67%), four species: *Azadi-
rachta indica* A. Juss., *Khaya grandifoliola* C.
DC., *K. senegalensis*, *Pseudocedrala kotschyi*
(Schweinf.) Harms (figure 3). These spe-
cies were used for other purposes including
firewood, art and sculpture, food and medi-
cine (table II).

The top 10 species were those who
reached the highest score (table III). For the
PSP and PSPW methods, the five top priori-
tized species were: *K. senegalensis*, *K. gran-
difoliola*, *P. kotschyi* (Meliaceae), *A. africana*
(Fabaceae) and *M. excelsa* (Moraceae). For the CRS method, the top species were *K. senegalensis*, *K. grandifoliola*, *A. africana*, *P. erinaceus* and *M. excelsa*. Finally, for the BRS method, the top species were *A. africana*, *K. senegalensis*, *K. grandifoliola*, *M. excelsa* and *P. erinaceus*. Two species

appeared at the top, whatever the method used: *K. senegalensis* and *K. grandifoliola*. From this ranking results, *K. senegalensis* could be considered the most important species for active conservation in Benin.

<table><caption>**Table II.**
Family diversity and derived products of timber species.</caption><thead><tr><th>Botanical family</th><th>Species</th><th>Common name</th><th>Derived Product</th><th>Uses</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="5">Malvaceae</td><td>Bombax costatum Pellegr. &amp; Vuillet</td><td>Faux-Kapokier<sup>a</sup></td><td>Formwork</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaert.</td><td>Fromager<sup>a</sup>, wutin<sup>b</sup>, agugu<sup>d</sup> secma<sup>e</sup> Aaba<sup>d</sup></td><td>Formwork, pirogues</td><td>1, 3</td></tr><tr><td>Cola cordifolia (Cav.) R. Br.</td><td>Wutin wi<sup>b</sup></td><td>Formwork</td><td>1, 2</td></tr><tr><td>Cola gigantea A. Chev.</td><td>Wutin<sup>b</sup></td><td>Formwork</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Triplochiton scleroxylon K. Schum</td><td>Samba<sup>a</sup>, Arere<sup>d</sup></td><td>Wooden furniture, doors, windows</td><td>1, 4</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Combretaceae</td><td>Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC.) Guill. &amp; Perr.</td><td>Hlihon<sup>b</sup>, kakala<sup>c</sup>, ayin<sup>d, f</sup>, kolo<sup>e</sup>, agbangag</td><td>Chevrons</td><td>1, 2</td></tr><tr><td>Terminalia glaucesens. Planch. ex Benth.</td><td>Alotu<sup>b</sup>, kpoba<sup>f</sup></td><td>Wooden tools, tool handles (brooms, hoes)</td><td>1, 3</td></tr><tr><td>Ebenaceae</td><td>Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A. DC.</td><td>Ebene<sup>a</sup>, kinwi<sup>b</sup>, donko<sup>d</sup>, tokag</td><td>Chevrons, joint covers ceilings, wooden statues</td><td>1, 2, 3</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="6">Fabaceae</td><td>Afzelia africana Sm.</td><td>Lingué<sup>a</sup>, kpakpadjidé<sup>b</sup>, gbébouc, akpaka<sup>d</sup></td><td>Wooden furniture, doors, windows, frames, statues</td><td>1, 3</td></tr><tr><td>Daniellia oliveri (Rolfe) Hutch. &amp; Dalziel</td><td>Zab, gnannouc, iya<sup>d</sup>, n'yobolo<sup>e</sup>, ferma<sup>g</sup></td><td>Shuttering for concrete, wooden seats</td><td>1, 2, 3</td></tr><tr><td>Isoberlinia doka Craib &amp; Stapf</td><td>Kpakpa<sup>b</sup>, gbaba<sup>c</sup>, goutouché<sup>e</sup></td><td>Chevrons, joint covers, ceilings frame, school furniture</td><td>1, 2</td></tr><tr><td>Isoberlinia tomentosa (Harms) Craib &amp; Stapf</td><td>Kpakpa<sup>b</sup>, gbaba<sup>c</sup>, goutouché<sup>e</sup></td><td>Chevrons, joint covers ceilings frame, school furniture</td><td>1, 2</td></tr><tr><td>Prosopis africana (Guill. &amp; Perr.) Taub.</td><td>Kaké<sup>b</sup>, woure<sup>e</sup>, dédjitouhouria</td><td>Mortars</td><td>1, 3</td></tr><tr><td>Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir.</td><td>Vena, kosso<sup>b</sup>, tonan/toro<sup>c</sup> osun dudu<sup>d</sup></td><td>Wooden furniture, school furniture, doors, windows, frames, statuettes, ornaments objects, tables</td><td>1, 3, 4</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Meliaceae</td><td>Azadirachta indica A. Juss.</td><td>Neem<sup>a</sup>, kinintin<sup>b</sup></td><td>Wooden tools, tool handles (brooms, hoes...)</td><td>1, 2</td></tr><tr><td>Khaya grandifoliola C. DC.</td><td>faux acadjou<sup>a</sup></td><td>School furniture, wooden tables frames, doors, windows ...</td><td>1, 2, 4</td></tr><tr><td>Khaya senegalensis (Desv.) A. Juss.</td><td>Calceidrat<sup>a</sup>, acadjou<sup>b</sup>, fele<sup>c</sup></td><td>School furniture, door and their frames, windows</td><td>1, 2, 3, 4</td></tr><tr><td>Pseudocedrala kotschyi (Schweinf.) Harms</td><td>Tchagligli<sup>b</sup></td><td>School furniture</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Moraceae</td><td>Antiaris toxicaria Lesch. subsp. welwitschii (Engler)</td><td>Faux iroko<sup>a</sup>, ororo<sup>f</sup></td><td>Formwork</td><td>1, 2</td></tr><tr><td>Milicia excelsa (Welw.) C.C. Berg</td><td>Iroko<sup>a</sup>, loko<sup>b</sup></td><td>Framework, craft, seats</td><td>1, 2, 3</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Verbenaceae</td><td>Gmelina arborea Roxb.</td><td>Faux teck<sup>a</sup></td><td>Wooden furniture, formwork, beds</td><td>1, 2, 3</td></tr><tr><td>Tectona grandis L.f.</td><td>Teck<sup>a</sup></td><td>Wooden furniture, statuettes, ornaments wooden objects</td><td>1, 2, 3</td></tr><tr><td>Rutaceae</td><td>Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides (Lam.) Zepem. &amp; Timler</td><td>Fagara<sup>a</sup>, ata<sup>d</sup></td><td>Wooden furniture, doors, windows</td><td>1, 4</td></tr><tr><td>Myrtaceae</td><td>Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.</td><td></td><td>Chevrons, other items, wooden ornaments</td><td>1, 4</td></tr></tbody></table>

Legend. a = Common name, b = fon, c = bariba, d = nago, e = agni, f = idatcha, g = dendi, 1 = Timber species, 2 = Wood services, 3 = Art and sculpture, 4 = Food-Medicine.
**Table III.**

List of the top 10 priority timber species for active conservation and sylviculture in Benin, obtaining by combining four different priority methods.

Species

PSP

PSPW

CRS

BRS

Total

Scoring

Khaya senegalensis (Desv.) A. Juss.

Khaya grandifoliola C. DC.

Afzelia africana Sm.

Milicia excelsa (Welw.) C.C. Berg

Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir.

Isoberlinia tomentosa (Harms) Craib & Stapf

Antiaris toxicaria Lesch. subsp. welwitschii (Engler)

Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC.) Guill. & Perr.

Pseudocedrela kotschyi (Schweinf.) Harms

Isoberlinia doka Craib & Stapf

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

PSP, point scoring procedure; PSPW, point scoring procedure with weighing; CRS, compound ranking system; BRS, binomial ranking system. For further information see Magos Brehm *et al.* (2010).

**Table IV.**

Ethnobotanical uses, national distribution and threats of the most prioritized timber species.

Species

Uses

National distribution

National Legislation

Threats assessment (Adomou *et al.*, 2010)

Threats assessment (IUCN Red List)

Khaya senegalensis (Desv.) A. Juss.

Khaya grandifoliola C. DC.

Afzelia africana Sm.

Milicia excelsa (Welw.) C.C. Berg

Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir.

Isoberlinia tomentosa (Harms) Craib & Stapf

Antiaris toxicaria Lesch. subsp. welwitschii (Engler)

Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC.) Guill. & Perr.

Pseudocedrela kotschyi (Schweinf.) Harms

Isoberlinia doka Craib & Stapf

Timber, medicinal use, food

Timber, medicinal use, food

Medicinal, soil fertilization, timber use, firewood

Ornamental, timber use, medicinal use

Medicinal, soil fertilization, timber, firewood, Food

Charcoal production, timber use, firewood

Timber

Timber, medicinal use, firewood, Charcoal

Medicinal, firewood, timber

Medicinal, firewood, timber

Charcoal, timber, firewood

Charcoal, timber, firewood

5 phytodistricts

3 phytodistricts

6 phytodistricts

4 phytodistricts

6 phytodistricts

3 phytodistricts

2 phytodistricts

4 phytodistricts

3 phytodistricts

4 phytodistricts

Décret n° 96-271 du 2 juillet 1996

Décret n° 96-271 du 2 juillet 1996

Décret n° 96-271 du 2 juillet 1996

Décret n° 96-271 du 2 juillet 1996

Décret n° 96-271 du 2 juillet 1996

No legislation

No legislation

Décret n° 96-271 du 2 juillet 1996

No legislation

Décret n° 96-271 du 2 juillet 1996

EN, endangered; NE, not evaluated; VU, vulnerable; NT, near threatened; LC, least concern.
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Map of the Republic of Benin showing the phytogeographical districts and the occurrence of the most prioritized timber species.</figcaption></figure>

In order of importance, the top ten species are listed in the table IV with their uses, national distribution and threats. Different uses were recorded for the top 10 timbers species. These uses were mostly timber, medicinal, food, charcoal and firewood. At national level, the "Décret n° 96-271 du 2 juillet 1996" (law 93.009 related to forest regime in Republic of Benin) has targeted 7 species as protected. Some priority species are under this law. The top 10 timber species are distributed along the 10 phyto districts. The most widely distributed species (figure 4) are *A. africana* and *P. erinaceus* (6 phytodistricts); *K. senegalensis* (5 phytodistricts); *M. excelsa*, *A. leiocarpa* and *I. doka* (4 phytodistricts); *K. grandifoliola*, *I. tomentosa* and *P. kotschyi* (3 phyto districts) and *A. toxicaria* (2 phytodistricts). According to the threat assessment, five species are endangered (*K. senegalensis*, *K. grandifoliola*, *A. africana*, *M. excelsa* and *P. erinaceus*) and using IUCN red list (international), three species are vulnerable (*K. senegalensis*, *K. grandifoliola*, *A. africana*), one near threatened (*M. excelsa*) and one of least concern (*I. doka*).

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Photo 3.**
Woody species used in charcoal production.
Photo J. D. T. Akpona.</figcaption></figure>
Discussion

This study aimed at establishing the first national TS inventory using multicriteria approach and setting priority for conservation in Benin. Our procedure for developing effective biodiversity conservation priorities of timber species in Benin was adapted from Magos Bhrem et al. (2010) and based on the availability of data information of local perceptions (UNEP, 1995). As many West African countries shared in a given degree the same timber species, we believe that it can be used or adapted to assist in species' prioritization and can also help in regional conservation of socio-economically important plant species. An active conservation of woody species is required, particularly timber species diversity, by establishing priority within species (Maxted et al., 2006). But effective strategies for biodiversity conservation (Maxted et al., 2006) has been developed using different methods. Our approach differs methodologically, from those used by Lawrence et al. (2005), Maraseni (2008), Vodouhe et al. (2009) and N'Danikou et al. (2011) who identified the most important Non-Timber Forest Products in Cameroun, Nepal, and Benin, respectively using community independent scoring in species value and conservation criteria. All these methodologies differ from the one used in this study and recently used by Idohou et al. (2013) because their findings were not based on the combination of criteria and in different methods. They argue on the importance of the use of the scoring method for studies of this type (N'Danikou et al., 2011). Brehm et al. (2010) argue that prioritization of species should be a dynamic process and multicriteria approach should be more relevant and criteria can change depending to the species or group of species considered (Idohou et al., 2013).

There were 24 timber species currently used in Benin. Much attention has historically been given to plant conservation (Codjia et al., 2003; Vodouhê et al., 2010; N'Danikou et al., 2011; Idohou et al., 2013; Yaoitcha et al., 2015; Sèwadé et al., 2016) and priority plant species have previously been suggested for conservation plans. These studies were related to crop wild relatives, wild edible plants and useful medicinal tree species.

Overall, 10 timber tree species were highlighted as priority for conservation in Benin. Among these species, *K. senegalensis*, *K. grandifoliola*, *A. africana*, *M. excelsa*, *P. erinaceus* appear as the top 5 priority species as available financial resources were not enough to conserve all species at once. Among the top 10 priorities species, 7 were protected under Benin Law 93.009 related to forest regime in Republic of Benin. This shows the importance of these species for conservation since 1993. Recent works from Yaoitcha et al. (2015) covering a single forest reserve, reported *A. africana*, *K. senegalensis*, *M. excelsa*, *P. erinaceus*, to be rare as perceived by local population around Wari-Maro forest reserve (Central Benin). Some other related works also revealed that prioritized species such as *K. senegalensis*, *P. erinaceus* and *M. excelsa* are threatened by overexploitation (Quinsavi et al., 2005; Gaoué et al., 2007; Glèlè Kakaï et al., 2008; Bonou et al., 2009; Houehanou et al., 2013); which support their importance as priority species for active conservation. Three species (*K. senegalensis*, *A. africana* and *P. erinaceus*) identified as priority for conservation were reported to be threatened in both open access and protected areas of Pendjari Biosphere Reserve of Benin (Houehanou et al., 2013). Besides it being a good lumber species, *M. excelsa* is also believed to

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Photo 4.**
*Khaya senegalensis* tree in urban area in Benin.
Photo J. D. T. Akpona.</figcaption></figure>
## References

possess some diabolic powers, thus making it severely overexploited in Benin (Quinsavi *et al.*, 2005). To date, a detailed threat assessment using IUCN Red List Criteria has only been assessed for a few species (table IV), yet most species facing human harvesting pressure were often exposed to decline (Idohou *et al.*, 2013). According to the IUCN Red List, *P. erinaceus* has not yet been evaluated but was evaluated in for Benin Red List (Adomou *et al.*, 2011) as endangered, along with *A. africana*, *K. senegalensis*, *M. excelsa*. The last three species were identified as vulnerable on the international IUCN Red List. *P. kotschyi* used also as medicinal and animal feed plant, appears in the top 10 important timber species and was listed as a socio-economically important species that needs close attention regarding its current exploitation trends (Yaoitcha *et al.*, 2015; Sèwadé *et al.*, 2016).

Active conservation of TS in Benin should be a priority as the country occupies an important part in the “Dahomey Gap” (Akoègninou *et al.*, 2006) who is a Savannah corridor separating the African rainforest into the western Guinea zone and the Central African Congo zone and where Biodiversity occur. Assuming the flora of Benin shares many species with that of other neighbouring countries covered by dense forests, then they may be facing the same problems because of the presence of similar timber species. The implications of this must be the implementation of trans-boundary strategies of conservation.

Many studies have previously been conducted on some of the identified priority species in Africa such as *P. erinaceus* (Ouédraogo *et al.*, 2006; Nacoulma *et al.*, 2011; Segla *et al.*, 2016), *A. africana* and *K. senegalensis* (Gaoué *et al.*, 2007; Traoré *et al.*, 2011; Delvaux *et al.*, 2009). All these studies have assessed population variations across ecological regions, the impact on population structure under different land use systems, viability of these species and proposed conservation strategies for their sustainable management and finally targeted sensitization of populations around habitats where the species occur to ensure conservation of these highly valued species. More attention should now be given to developing sylviculture packages for priority species.

## Conclusion

This study highlights timber species diversity in Benin and yield substantial information on priority species for conservation and sylviculture. A total of 24 timber species were inventoried and most of them are used for medicine, food and charcoal. Ten species were selected as priority active conservation of these species requires allocating more effort for developing sylviculture packages and policy need to be developed to conserve the remains populations.

## Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by Rufford Foundation through grant N° 14635-1 provided to the first author. We are very grateful to the members of the Laboratoire de Bi mathématiques et d'Estimations Forestières (University of Abomey-Calavi).

Adomou A. C., 2005. Vegetation patterns and environmental gradient in Benin: implications for biogeography and conservation. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands, 136 p.

Adomou A. C., Sinsin B., Akoègninou A. A., van der Maesen J., 2010. Plant species and ecosystems with high conservation priority in Benin. In: System Conservation African Plants, Eds van der Burgt X., van der Maesen J., Onana J-M., Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 429-444.

Adomou C. A., Agbani O. P., Sinsin B., 2011. Plantes. In: Protection de la nature en Afrique de l'Ouest: Une liste rouge pour le Bénin / Nature Conservation in West Africa: Red List for Benin, Eds Neuenschwander P. S., Sinsin B., Goergen G., International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria, 365 p.

Albuquerque U. P., Medeiros P. M., Almeida A. L., Monteiro J. M., LinsNeto E. M. F., de Melo J. G., *et al.*, 2007. Medicinal plants of the caatinga (semi-arid) vegetation of NE Brazil: a quantitative approach. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 114: 325-354.

Amadé O., Adjima T., Karen Hahn-H., Sita G., 2006. Diagnostic de l'état de dégradation des peuplements de quatre espèces ligneuses en zone soudanienne du Burkina Faso. Science et changements planétaires / Sécheresse, 17 (4): 485-491.

Akoègninou A., van der Burg W. J., van der Maesen L. J. G., 2006. Flore Analytique du Bénin. Backhuys Publishers, Wageningen, 1034 p.

Bonou W., Glèlè Kakaï R., Assogbadjo A. E., Fonton H. N., Sinsin B., 2009. Characterisation of *Afelia africana* Sm. habitat in the Lama Forest reserve of Benin. Forest Ecology and Management, 258: 1084-1092.

Codjia J. T. C., Assogbadjo A. E., Ekue M. R. M., 2003. Diversité et valorisation au niveau local des ressources végétales forestières alimentaires du Bénin. Cahiers d'Agricultures, 12, 321-331.

Dagnelie P., 1998. Statistiques théoriques et appliquées Tomes 1 et 2. Brussels, De Boeck et Larcier, 555 p. et 733 p. Delvaux C., Sinsin B., Darchambeau F., Van Damme P., 2009. Recovery from bark harvesting of 12 medicinal tree species in Benin, West Africa. Journal of Apply Ecology, 46 (3): 703-712.

de Souza S., 2008. Flore du Bénin Tome 3. Nom des plantes dans les langues nationales béninoises. Cotonou, 679 p.
Dimobe K., Wala K., Dourma M., Kiki M., Woegan Y., Folega F., et al., 2014. Disturbance and Population Structure of Plant Communities in the Wildlife Reserve of Oti-Mandouri in Togo (West Africa). *Annual Research & Review in Biology*, 4 (15): 2501-2516.

FAO, 2009. Situation des forêts du monde. FAO, Rome, Italy, 43 p.

FAO, 2011. Situation des forêts du monde. FAO, Rome, Italy, 33 p.

Gaoue O.G., Ticktin T., 2007. Patterns of harvesting foliage and bark from the multipurpose tree *Khaya senegalensis* in Benin: Variation across ecological regions and its impacts on population structure. *Biological Conservation*, 137 (3): 424-436.

Glèlè Kakaï R. L., Sinsin B., Palm R., 2008. Étude dendrométrique de *Pterocarpus erinaceus* Poir. des formations naturelles de la zone soudanienne au Bénin. *Agronomie Africaine*, 20 (3): 245-255.

Glèlè Kakaï R., Sinsin B., 2009. Structural description of two *Isoberlinia* dominated vegetation types in the Wari-Maro Forest Reserve (Benin). *South African Journal of Botany*, 75: 43-51.

Gogan Y., 2010. Évaluation des espèces ligneuses actuelles et potentiellement candidates à l'exploitation forestière dans deux zones biogéographiques du Bénin : implication au reboisement et à la gestion durable des ressources forêtières. *Mémoire de licence*, UCAO, 60 p.

Houehanou D. T., Assogbadjo A. E., Glèlè Kakaï R., Kyndt T., Sinsin B., 2013. How far a protected area contributes to conserve habitat species composition and population structure of endangered African tree species. *Ecological Complexity*, 13: 60-68.

Idohou R., Assogbadjo A. E., Fandohan B., Gouwakinnou G. N., Glélé Kakaï R. L., Sinsin B., et al., 2012. National inventory and prioritization of crop wild relatives: case study for Benin. *Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution*, 60: 1337-1352.

IUCN, 2015. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015-4. http://www.iucnredlist.org (03/03/2016).

ITTO. 2007. Status of Tropical Forest Management 2005. International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan, 32 p.

Magos Brehm J. M., Maxted N., Martins-Loucao M. A., Ford-Lloyd B. V., 2010. New approaches for establishing conservation priorities for socio-economically important plant species. *Biodiversity Conservation*, 19: 2715-2740.

Maxted N., Ford-Lloyd B. V., Hawkes J. G. (Eds), 1997. Plant genetic conservation: the in-situ approach. Springer, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 446 p.

Maxted N., Kell S. P., 2009a. Establishment of a global network for the in-situ conservation of crop wild relatives: status and needs. FAO Consultancy Report, FAO, Rome, Italy, 265 p.

Maxted N., Kell S. P., 2009b. Commission on genetic resources for food and agriculture. Establishment of a global network for the in-situ conservation of crop wild relatives: status and needs. Background study, 39: 212 p.

Nacoulma B. M. I., Schumann K., Traoré S., Bernhardt-Römermann M., Hahn K., Wittig R., et al., 2011. Impacts of land-use on West African savanna vegetation: a comparison between protected and communal area in Burkina Faso. *Biodiversity Conservation*, 20 (14): 3341-3362.

N'danikou S., Achigan-Dako E., Wong J. L. G., 2011. Eliciting local values of wild edible plants in Southern Bénin to identify priority species for conservation. *Economic Botany*, 65 (4): 381-395.

Ouinsavi C., Sokpon N., Bada O., 2005. Utilization and traditional strategies of in situ conservation of iroko (*Milicia excelsa* Welw. C.C. Berg) in Benin. *Forest Ecology and Management*, 207: 341-350.

Putz F. E., 1991. Silvicultural effects of lianas. *In: The Biology of Vines*, Eds Putz F. E., Mooney H. A., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 493-501.

Rabinowitz D., Cairns S., Dillon T., 1986. Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles, *In: Conservation Biology: the science of scarcity and diversity*, Soulé M. E. (Ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, p. 182-204.

Segla N. K., Habou R., Adjonou K., Mamoudou B. M., Saley K., Radji R. A., Kokutse A. D., Bationo A. B., Ali M., Kokou K., 2016. Population structure and minimum felling diameter of *Pterocarpus erinaceus* Poir. in arid and semi-arid climate zones of West Africa. *South African Journal of Botany*, 103: 17-24.

Sèwadé C., Azihou A. F., Fandohan A. B., Houéhanou T. D., Houinato M., 2016. Diversité, priorité pastorale et de conservation des ligneux fourragers des terres de parcours en zone soudano-guinéenne du Bénin. *Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement*, 20: 113-129.

Tabuti J. R. S., Muwanika V. B., Arinaitwe M. Z., Ticktin T., 2011. Conservation of priority woody species on farmlands: a case study from Nawaikoke sub-county, Uganda. *Applied Geography*, 31: 456-462.

Traore L., Ouedraogo I., Ouedraogo A., Thiombiano A., 2011. Perceptions, usages et vulnérabilité des ressources végétales ligneuses dans le Sud-Ouest du Burkina Faso. *International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences*, 5 (1): 258-278.

UNEP (United National Environment Programme), 1995. *In: Global biodiversity assessment*, Heywood (Ed.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1152 p.

Yaoitcha A. S., Houehanou T. D., Fandohan A. B., Houinato M. R. B., 2015. Prioritization of useful medicinal tree species for conservation in Wari-Maro Forest Reserve in Benin: A multivariate analysis approach. *Forest Policy and Economics*, 61: 135-146.