# Male fertility in Pyricularia oryzae: Microconidia are spermatia

Alexandre Lassagne, Sylvain Brun, Fabienne Malagnac, Henri Adreit, Joëlle Milazzo, Elisabeth Fournier, Didier Tharreau

► To cite this version:

Alexandre Lassagne, Sylvain Brun, Fabienne Malagnac, Henri Adreit, Joëlle Milazzo, et al. Male fertility in Pyricularia oryzae: Microconidia are spermatia. Environmental Microbiology, 2022, 24 (12), pp.6365-6375. 10.1111/1462-2920.16226. hal-03850717

HAL Id: hal-03850717

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03850717

Submitted on 14 Nov 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
RESEARCH ARTICLE

# Male fertility in *Pyricularia oryzae*: Microconidia are spermatia

Alexandre Lassagne<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" /> | Sylvain Brun<fnref n="3" /> | Fabienne Malagnac<fnref n="4" /> |
Henri Adreit<fnref n="1" /> | Joëlle Milazzo<fnref n="1" /> | Elisabeth Fournier<fnref n="2" /> | Didier Tharreau<fnref n="1" />

Correspondence

Didier Tharreau, Plant Health Institute of
Montpellier (PHIM), CIRAD, TA A120/K,
34398 Montpellier, France.

Email: didier.tharreau@cirad.fr

Funding information

Centre de Coopération Internationale en
Recherche Agronomique pour le
Développement, Grant/Award Number: PhD
grant to AL; Institut National de Recherche
pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et
l'Environnement; French National Research
Agency, Grant/Award Number: ANR-10-INSB-
04; INRAE; CIRAD

Abstract

Sexual reproduction in Ascomycetes is well described in several model organisms such as *Neurospora crassa* or *Podospora anserina*. Deciphering the biological process of sexual reproduction (from the recognition between compatible partners to the formation of zygote) can be a major advantage to better control sexually reproducing pathogenic fungi. In *Pyricularia oryzae*, the fungal pathogen causing blast diseases on several Poaceae species, the biology of sexual reproduction remains poorly documented. Besides the well-documented production of asexual macroconidia, the production of microconidia was seldom reported in *P. oryzae*, and their role as male gamete (i.e., spermatia) and in male fertility has never been explored. Here, we characterised the morphological features of microconidia and demonstrated that they are bona fide spermatia. Contrary to macroconidia, microconidia are not able to germinate and seem to be the only male gametes in *P. oryzae*. We show that fruiting body (perithecium) formation requires microconidia to get in contact with mycelium of strains of opposite mating type, to presumably fertilise the female gametes.

INTRODUCTION

The reproductive system influences the apparition and
the evolution of adaptive variants in response to selec-
tive pressures. Asexual reproduction induces clonality
which allows an adapted genotype to spread quickly in
a homogeneous environment. By contrast, sexual
reproduction induces recombination which generates
new genotypic combinations that can be advantageous
in heterogeneous environments (De Meeûs
et al., 2007; Stukenbrock & McDonald, 2008). Recom-
bination also permits to slow down the accumulation of
deleterious mutations (Bruggeman et al., 2003). Some
eukaryote taxa like Ascomycete fungi exhibit a wide
variety of reproductive systems, from strictly clonal to
strictly sexual species, including numerous species that

alternate both (Billiard et al., 2012). To understand how
reproduction systems and genes involved in these pro-
cesses evolved in Ascomycete fungi, a prerequisite is
to document how sexual reproduction takes place and
what the biological determinants of fertility are.

Sexual reproduction implies the succession of hap-
loid, dikaryotic and diploid phases implemented during
meiosis and syngamy (Billiard et al., 2012). In Ascomy-
cete fungi, the reproduction cycle starts by the encoun-
ter of a male gamete (either contained in antheridia, or
present as individualised specialised cells called sper-
matia) with a female differentiated gamete (the ascogo-
nium), a step called fertilisation. The ascogonium is a
multinucleate haploid cell produced by mitosis (Billiard
et al., 2012) which differentiates specialised hyphae
called trichogynes (Debuchy et al., 2010). Hormonal

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.

© 2022 The Authors. *Environmental Microbiology* published by Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

<footnote n="1">¹Plant Health Institute of Montpellier (PHIM), CIRAD, Montpellier, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Plant Health Institute of Montpellier (PHIM), University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRD, Montpellier, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Institut Jacques Monod, Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France</footnote>
attraction directs the growth of trichogynes towards spermatia (Bistis, 1996). This hormonal chemotropism is controlled by the mating type genes on a pheromone/receptor recognition basis and occurs only between cells of opposite mating type in heterothallic species (Bistis, 1983). The contact between the trichogyne and the spermatia triggers cell fusion, that is, plasmogamy, after which the spermatia nucleus migrates across the trichogyne into the ascogonium (Brun et al., 2021). Plasmogamy is controlled by mating-type genes (Bistis, 1996; Peraza-Reyes & Malagnac, 2016). Plasmogamy is followed by syngamy, meiosis and differentiation of the ascus that will contain the ascospores produced after meiosis. Asci are contained in fruiting bodies (perithecia in *P. oryzae*), which are composed of an envelope of maternal origin that shelters the ascogonium. Hence, sexual reproduction in heterothallic Ascomycetes is an intricate process which requires, on the one hand, mating type compatibility between partners, and on the other hand, female and male fertile gametes.

*Pyricularia oryzae* (syn. *Magnaporthe oryzae*) is a phytopathogenic fungus of Pyriculariaceae (Klaubauf et al., 2014), causing blast disease on many cultivated cereals (rice, wheat, maize, millets...) and others Poaceae (Couch et al., 2005; Gladieux et al., 2018a). This fungus is responsible for the rice blast disease causing the loss of 3% of global rice yield (Savary et al., 2019). The genetic lineage of *P. oryzae* pathogenic on rice likely emerged in South Asia, close to the Himalayas (Gladieux et al., 2018b; Saleh et al., 2014; Pharreau et al., 2009; Zeigler, 1998) and is reported in more than 80 countries across the world (Boddy, 2016). The asexual mode of reproduction, through asexual spores (macroconidia) or mycelium multiplication, is commonly observed on rice host and most of the pathogen populations are clonal (Zeigler, 1998). Although sexual reproduction of *P. oryzae* has never been observed in the field on any host, evidences from biology, genetic and genomic studies of populations from rice suggest that sexual reproduction took place or is still taking place in limited areas in the putative centre of origin (Gladieux et al., 2018b; Saleh et al., 2012b; Thierry et al., 2021). *P. oryzae* is a heterothallic species with two idiomorphs at the mating type locus named Mat1.1 and Mat1.2 (Kanamori et al., 2007). Sexual reproduction is easy to complete in vitro in this species. Formation of perithecia is easily observed in the laboratory by crossing fertile strains of opposite mating types, on artificial medium (Nottéghem & Silué, 1992). However, only some strains are able to form perithecia, and are then defined as female fertile. Similarly, male fertility has so far been defined as the capacity to induce perithecia formation in a female fertile strain of opposite mating type (Saleh et al., 2012a). However, the mechanisms of fertilisation have not yet been described. By analogy with other Ascomycetes, microconidia have

been supposed to be the male fertilising elements (Fukumori et al., 2004). Microconidia were observed for the first time by Kato et al. (1994). Microconidia as well as specialised hyphae bearing them (phialides) were also observed by Chuma et al. (2009) and more recently by Zhang et al. (2014). But the role of microconidia in fertilisation was not demonstrated yet. Here, we demonstrate that microconidia are fertilising cells, that is, spermatia in *P. oryzae*. We propose a new and direct biological definition of male fertility in *P. oryzae*, independent of the stimulation by a female fertile strain.

# EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

## Biological materials

We used 12 *P. oryzae* strains isolated from six different host plants and collected in seven different countries (Table 1). Strains of both mating types (Mat1.1 and Mat1.2) were used to measure the production of microconidia. The strains CH0997 (Mat1.2) and CH0999 (Mat1.1) (Saleh et al., 2012a), used for the fertilisation and mating assays, were collected on *Oryza sativa* in China in 2008 and belong to lineage 1 (Gladieux et al., 2018b; Latorre et al., 2020; Thierry et al., 2021). All strains were stored at -20°C on dried filter paper (Valent et al., 1986).

## Growing media

Rice flour agar (RFA) medium was prepared with 20 g of organic rice flour, 15 g of Bacto agar, 2 g of Yeast Extract (Bacto™) in 1 L water with 500,000 units of penicillin G added after autoclaving for 20 min at 120°C. Fresh homemade potato dextrose broth (PDB) was prepared with 200 g of sliced organic potatoes boiled for 30 min in 800 ml sterile water. The preparation was filtrated through multilayer gauze. The filtrated solution was added with 20 g of glucose and replenished to 1 L.

## Microconidia production

Microconidia were produced following a protocol modified by Zhang et al. (2014). Two circular plugs of 5 mm diameter of actively growing mycelium on RFA medium were used to inoculate 40 ml of fresh homemade PDB. The liquid culture was incubated for 3 days at 25°C, then 6 days at 20°C with permanent shaking at 150 rpm, and then filtrated on Miracloth (EMD Millipore Corp., 475855-1R) to remove mycelium fragments, and centrifuged at 4500g for 10 min. The pelleted microconidia were resuspended in 1 ml sterile distilled water. When microconidia production was too low, after
<table><caption>TABLE 1 Production of microconidia by different *Pyricularia oryzae* strains in liquid culture. Information on synonymous names, on the sampling, on accession numbers to publicly available genetic information, on the fertility in mating assays and on the number of microconidia produced</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Strain</th><th rowspan="2">Synonymous</th><th rowspan="2">References</th><th rowspan="2">Genetic information</th><th rowspan="2">Mating type</th><th rowspan="2">Isolated in</th><th rowspan="2">Isolated from</th><th rowspan="2">Lineage (rice strains only)</th><th colspan="3">Mating assays</th><th colspan="3">Microconidia production.m1<sup>-1</sup></th></tr><tr><th>Male fertility</th><th>Female fertility</th><th>Replicate 1</th><th>Replicate 2</th><th>Mean replicates</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>US0068</td><td>70-15</td><td>Dean et al. (2005)</td><td>INSDC Assembly GCA_000002495.2</td><td>Mat1.1</td><td>USA</td><td>Hybrid lab strain (pathogenic to rice)</td><td>1</td><td>Fertile</td><td>Fertile</td><td>2.36E+06</td><td>1.53E+06</td><td>1.94E+06</td></tr><tr><td>OG0002</td><td>UG771511, KA3</td><td>Kato et al. (2000)</td><td></td><td>Mat1.1</td><td>Ouganda</td><td>Eleusine coracana</td><td></td><td>Fertile</td><td>Fertile</td><td>8.57E+07</td><td>2.05E+08</td><td>1.46E+08</td></tr><tr><td>OG0003</td><td>UG771711, KA4</td><td>Tanaka et al. (2009)</td><td></td><td>Mat1.1</td><td>Ouganda</td><td>Eleusine coracana</td><td></td><td>Fertile</td><td>Fertile</td><td>7.03E+08</td><td>1.51E+09</td><td>1.10E+09</td></tr><tr><td>GY0006</td><td></td><td>This article</td><td></td><td>Mat1.2</td><td>French Guyana</td><td>Oryza sativa</td><td></td><td>Fertile</td><td>Fertile</td><td>2.80E+04</td><td>1.73E+04</td><td>2.27E+04</td></tr><tr><td>GY0011</td><td>GUY11</td><td>Leung et al. (1988)</td><td>NCBI database: ASM236848v1 (GY11 PacBio Bao 2016)</td><td>Mat1.2</td><td>French Guyana</td><td>Oryza sativa</td><td>1</td><td>Fertile</td><td>Fertile</td><td>1.04E+06</td><td>1.06E+06</td><td>1.05E+06</td></tr><tr><td>CD0141</td><td></td><td>This article</td><td></td><td>Mat1.2</td><td>Ivory Coast</td><td>Leersia hexandre</td><td></td><td>Fertile</td><td>ND</td><td>2.00E+04</td><td>2.13E+04</td><td>2.07E+04</td></tr><tr><td>TH0012</td><td></td><td>Gladieux et al. (2018a)</td><td>ENA repository: PRJEB8341 (TH16 GEMO)</td><td>Mat1.1</td><td>Thailand</td><td>Hordeum vulgare</td><td>1</td><td>Fertile</td><td>Fertile</td><td>6.13E+04</td><td>2.69E+06</td><td>1.38E+06</td></tr><tr><td>TH0016</td><td></td><td>Gladieux et al. (2018a)</td><td>ENA repository: PRJEB8341 (TH16 GEMO)</td><td>Mat1.2</td><td>Thailand</td><td>Hordeum vulgare</td><td>1</td><td>Fertile</td><td>Fertile</td><td>3.60E+04</td><td>4.40E+04</td><td>4.00E+04</td></tr><tr><td>CH0997</td><td></td><td>Saleh et al. (2012a, 2012b)</td><td></td><td>Mat1.2</td><td>China</td><td>Oryza sativa</td><td>1</td><td>Fertile</td><td>Fertile</td><td>5.33E+04</td><td>4.80E+04</td><td>5.07E+04</td></tr><tr><td>CH0999</td><td></td><td>Saleh et al. (2012a, 2012b)</td><td></td><td>Mat1.1</td><td>China</td><td>Oryza sativa</td><td>1</td><td>Fertile</td><td>Fertile</td><td>4.52E+05</td><td>5.49E+05</td><td>5.00E+05</td></tr><tr><td>BF0026</td><td></td><td>This article</td><td></td><td>Mat1.2</td><td>Burkina Faso</td><td>Eleusine indica</td><td></td><td>Fertile</td><td>Fertile</td><td>0.00E+00</td><td>0.00E+00</td><td>0.00E+00</td></tr><tr><td>CH0052</td><td></td><td>Gladieux et al. (2018a)</td><td></td><td>Mat1.1</td><td>China</td><td>Oryza sativa</td><td>2</td><td>Fertile</td><td>Sterile</td><td>0.00E+00</td><td>0.00E+00</td><td>0.00E+00</td></tr></tbody></table>
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 1 Interpretation of in vitro sexual crossing of *Pyricularia oryzae* with a tested strain of unknown fertility and a female fertile reference strain of opposite mating types. (A) Two lines of perithecia are formed: The tested strain is both male and female fertile. (B) One line of perithecia is formed: The tested strain is female sterile but male fertile. (C) Absence of perithecia: The tested strain is both male and female sterile.</figcaption></figure>

filtration on Miracloth, the liquid culture was filtrated at 0.45 µm and microconidia were collected from the filter surface by washing the filter in 3 ml sterile water. To evaluate the capacity of each studied strain to produce microconidia, two independent replicates were performed and microconidia were counted three times for each replicate using a Malassez cell of 5 mm² and a limit threshold of 4000 units per ml.

## Staining and microscopic observation

For staining of cell wall, a droplet of Uvitex 2B (biovalley, 19517-10) fluorescent dye was added directly in the suspension of macroconidia or microconidia on a microscopic slide and incubated in the dark for 15 min. The preparation was observed under photonic microscope Nikon ECLIPSE Ni-E with 390 nm GFP excitation filter. Ascogonia were observed with an inverted microscope Zeiss Axio observer Z.1 (objective 63× Plan Apo ON 1.4 Oil DIC) and photographed with an ORCA Flash4 LT CMOS camera (Hamamatsu). Images were analysed using Fiji software (Schindelin et al., 2012).

## Mating assays

Crosses between strains of opposite mating type were performed as described by Nottéghem and Silué (1992) on RFA medium in 90 mm Petri dishes. Plugs of mycelia grown on RFA at 25°C for 1 week were deposited on RFA medium following the design described in

Saleh et al. (2012a). Cultures were incubated under continuous light for 2 days at 25°C and then at 20°C. The reference strains CH0997 and CH0999 are known to be female fertile when crossed with a broad number of genetically diverse strains (Thierry et al., 2021). The production of mature perithecia was evaluated 21 days after inoculation to determine the fertility phenotype according to Saleh et al. (2012b): the formation of two rows of perithecia between a tested strain and a reference strain of opposite mating type indicated that both strains were male fertile and female fertile (Figure 1A); the observation of a single row indicated that only the reference strain produced perithecia, and that the tested strain was female sterile but male fertile (Figure 1B); the absence of perithecia indicated that the tested strain was both female-sterile and male-sterile (Figure 1C). The cross CH0997 × CH0999 was used as positive controls, the crosses CH0997 × CH0997 and CH0999 × CH0999 were used as negative controls.

## Fertilisation assays

To assess the fertilisation capacity of microconidia, we first grew female fertile strains on RFA medium in 90 mm diameter Petri dishes for 3 days at 25°C and 6 days at 20°C. The two reference strains CH0997 (Mat1.2) and CH0999 (Mat1.1) were chosen as ‘female’ thalli in this experiment. After screening different strains, OG0002 (Mat1.1) was chosen as ‘male’ thallus in this experiment for its capacity to produce high quantities of microconidia. We prepared
microconidia suspensions of OG0002 following the pro-
tocol described above, and adjusted them to 11 different
concentrations: 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 4000, 6000,
8000, 12,000 and 24,000 microconidia.ml⁻¹. For each
suspension, 250 µl were sprayed on the mycelium of
CH0997 and CH0999 strains. The inoculated plates
were then cultured for 3 more days at 20°C before
observation of perithecia formation. Two replicates
were performed for each combination of female
strain × concentration of microconidia suspensions.

The fertilisation capacity of macroconidia was tested
in a similar way, using the same strains grown as
described above. Macroconidia of strain OG0002 were
harvested on aerial mycelium from cultures grown on
RFA medium for 2 weeks at 25°C. To release macroco-
nidia from the mycelium, cultures were gently scrapped
after addition of 4 ml distilled water. Macroconidia sus-
pensions were then filtrated on a 40 µm filter to eliminate
mycelium fragments. Female fertile strains CH0997 and
CH0999 were inoculated with 250 µl of suspensions at
9.00 × 10⁴ macroconidia.mL⁻¹ of OG0002.

We also tested the fertilisation capacity of mycelium
using the same strains as above (i.e., OG0002 as
'male', and CH0997 and CH0999 as 'female'). To pro-
duce mycelium fragments of OG0002, 40 ml of com-
mercial PDB (Difco™) were inoculated with two plugs
of 5 mm diameter of mycelium actively growing on RFA
medium. We observed that, in our conditions, microco-
nidia are not produced in commercial PDB. The liquid
culture was incubated with a permanent shaking at
150 rpm for 3 days at 25°C and then for 6 days at
20°C. The mycelium was then centrifuged at 4500g for
10 min and resuspended in 4 ml sterile water. Mycelium
was sonicated for 1 min at 12 W and 20 Hz to obtain
fragments. The female fertile strains CH0997 and
CH0999, grown as described above, were then inocu-
lated with 250 µl of mycelium fragment suspensions.
The same volume of suspensions of mycelium frag-
ments was also inoculated on two plates of RFA
medium to check their viability.

Quantification of perithecia on fertilised cultures

After 3 days of incubation, pictures of plates of fertilisa-
tion assays were taken with a camera. The proportion
of the surface occupied by perithecia formed on plates
was evaluated by image analysis with the software
IPSDK Explorer developed by Reactiv'IP. This software
uses machine learning techniques to classify pixels.
The software was trained to classify pixels into three
classes: background, mycelium and perithecia (model
in Supporting Information). Due to the difficulty to pre-
cisely count individual perithecia, we quantified the
number of pixels assigned to the ‘perithecia’ class. We

then calculated the proportion of surface occupied by
perithecia as the ratio of the number of pixels assigned
to the ‘perithecia’ class on the number of pixels
assigned to the ‘mycelium’ + ‘perithecia’ classes. We
used the ‘drc’ R package (Ritz et al., 2015) to fit a log-
logistic model with the lowest value fixed to 0 and three
parameters (b, d, e) as in the following equation:

$$
f(x) = \frac{d}{\left[1 + \exp\left(b * \left(\log(x) - \log(e)\right)\right)\right]}
$$

Time frame assay for production of
fertilisation competent female gametes

To determine the minimum time required for the
female thallus to become competent for fertilisation,
20 µl of a suspension of OG0002 microconidia of
opposite mating type (1 × 10⁶/ml) were poured on
mycelial cultures of the female strain CH0997 of eight
different ages (from 3 to 10 days). Eight plates of
CH0997 were cultured on RFA medium at 25°C for
2–9 days, respectively, before being placed at 20°C
1 day before the inoculation with microconidia of
OG0002. Perithecia formation was assessed every
day from the 10th to the 17th day of the experiment.
The presence of perithecia was assessed based on
the observation of fungal structures with the morpho-
logical characteristics of perithecia.

RESULTS

Production of microconidia by P. oryzae
strains

Ten out of the 12 studied strains produced microconidia in fresh homemade PDB (Table 1). All 10 strains inducing the formation of perithecia in classical in vitro tests produced from 2.07 × 10⁴ to 1.10 × 10⁹ (significant effect of the strain tested with a nested ANOVA: *F* = 1021.7, *p* = 2 × 10⁻¹⁶, *Df* = 11) microconidia (Figure 2). A significant difference in microconidia production was also observed when considering only the five strains isolated from the same host, rice (nested ANOVA: *F* = 232.57, *p* = 2 × 10⁻¹⁶, *Df* = 4). The two strains producing the highest number of microconidia were OG0002 and OG0003, with 1.46 × 10⁸ and 1.10 × 10⁹ microconidia.ml⁻¹, respectively, that is, 100 to 10,000 times more than the other producing strains. Based on its high microconidia production, OG0002 was chosen as ‘male’ fertilising strain in the following assays. The number of microconidia produced was consistent between the two biological replicates of the same strain, except for
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 2 Quantity of microconidia produced for different strains of *Pyricularia oryzae* from different countries and host plants.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 3 Crosses between strains CH0052 (Mat1.1) and BF0026 (Mat1.2) with four reference female fertile strains CH0999 (Mat1.1), CH1003 (Mat1.1), CH0997 (Mat1.2) and CH1019 (Mat1.2).</figcaption></figure>

TH0012. Although microconidia were not observed for strains CH0052 and BF0026 (Table 1), these strains induced the formation of a low quantity of perithecia on female reference strain. Furthermore, CH0052 and BF0026 induced perithecia formation with only one of the two female reference strains (Figure 3). As expected from previous reports, microconidia were

produced regardless of the mating type of the strains, with four strains of each mating type producing microconidia and one strain of each mating type not producing microconidia. It is important to note that microconidia were obtained from cultures of single strains, confirming that the stimulation by another strain is not necessary to induce their production.
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 4 Macroconidia and microconidia of *Pyricularia oryzae* strain OG0002 under differential interference contrast light microscopy (100×) and with 0.05% Uvitex stain. (A) Macroconidia, (B) microconidia, (C) macroconidia (350 nm excitation light) and (D) microconidia (350 nm excitation light).</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 5 Fluorescence microscopy of microconidia worn by phialides hyphae of the transformed strain CH0997_GFP. (mi) microconidia, (ph) phialide.</figcaption></figure>

Morphological characteristics of
microconidia

The mean length of OG0002 microconidia was 7.36 µm (n = 62, standard deviation = 1.15). Hence microconidia are smaller than macroconidia whose dimensions are 16–33 µm long and 6–13 µm wide (Biju-Duval, 1994; Chuma et al., 2009; Ou, 1985). Microconidia are also clearly distinguishable from macroconidia

in their structure and shape (Figure 4): they are single-celled and crescent-shaped (Figure 4B,D), whereas macroconidia are three-celled and pyriform with a characteristic light grey pigmentation (Figure 4A,C). Microconidia have a hyaline aspect (Figure 4B), which makes them uneasy to observe under microscope at low magnification and on cultures on solid medium. Both types of conidia have a chitinous cell wall evidenced by Uvitex staining (Figure 4C,D). Microconidia are worn by specialised hyphae called phialides (Figure 5).

Fertilisation assays

Spraying of pure suspension of microconidia of strain OG0002 (Mat1.1) on a 'female' strain of opposite mating type previously cultured for 9 days induced the formation of perithecia (Figure 6). Perithecia were formed on cultures of CH0997 (Mat1.2) for all concentrations of sprayed suspensions of microconidia in both replicates. Perithecia were observed 3 days after spraying. No perithecium was formed on cultures of CH0997 either sprayed with sterile water or unsprayed. As expected, no perithecia were formed by CH0999 (Mat1.1) after spraying with OG0002 microconidia, since both strains were of the same mating type.

We observed a significant positive relationship between the number of microconidia sprayed on the 'female' thalli and a proxy of the number of perithecia (i.e., the proportion of surface occupied by perithecia on the fertilised culture). The relationship between the number of microconidia sprayed and the proportion of
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 6** Observation of perithecia formation on female fertile strains 3 days after spraying with microconidia of OG0002 (Mat 1.1). (A) 100 microconidia sprayed on CH0997 (Mat 1.2) compatible strain. (B) 6000 microconidia sprayed on CH0997 (Mat 1.2) compatible strain. (C) 6000 microconidia sprayed on CH0999 (Mat 1.1) incompatible strain.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 7** Relationship between the number of microconidia of OG0002 deposited and the number of perithecia formed on CH0997 is approximate by image analysis. The fitted model is a logistic curve with the lowest value fixed at 0 and 3 parameters (b, d, e).</figcaption></figure>

surface occupied by perithecia was explained by a log-
logistic model with minimum value fixed at 0 and three
parameters (b: slope, d: plateau, and e: ED50), with
$b = -1.59 \times 10^{-3}$, $d = 0.39$ and $e = 2670$ (Figure 7).
A plateau seems to be reached around 0.39 corre-
sponding to 39% of pixels assigned to perithecia.

Unlike for microconidia spraying, no perithecia were
formed 3 days after spraying with macroconidia or with
mycelium fragments of OG0002 on CH0997. However,
perithecia started to appear 2 weeks after spraying
mycelium fragments or macroconidia. As expected,
since they have the same mating type, no perithecia
were formed at all after spraying with macroconidia or
with mycelium fragments of OG0002 on CH0999.

Production of fertilisation competent
female gametes

Ascogonia were observed on female fertile strain thalli
aged 11 days (Figure 8). To determine a putative

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 8** Inverted microscopy of ascogonium of the strain CH0997. Scale bar = 10 µm.</figcaption></figure>

minimum age for female receptivity, microconidia sus-
pensions were sprayed on cultures of the female fertile
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 9 Time frame of perithecia development of strain CH0997 inoculated at different ages with spermatia of OG0002. Time scale corresponds to the number of days after the start of the culture of CH0997. The inoculation corresponds to the deposition of the microconidia suspension of OG0002 on the mycelial culture of CH0997.</figcaption></figure>

strain CH0997 from 4 to 11 days after the starting of the culture. When the female fertile strain was grown for 7 days or more on RFA medium before inoculation (i.e., 6 days or more at 25°C and 1 day at 20°C), the formation of perithecia in those conditions occurred 6 days after spraying microconidia suspension. For younger cultures, that is, when the female fertile strain was grown 6 days or less on RFA medium before inoculation (i.e., 5 days or less at 25°C and 1 day at 20°C), it took more than 6 days for perithecia to be formed (7–10 days for cultures aged of 6–3 days, respectively; Figure 9). Hence, the age of the female thallus influences the ability to form perithecia.

DISCUSSION

The first aim of our study was to confirm that *P. oryzae* from different origins were capable of producing microconidia. The other aim was to determine whether, in *P. oryzae* life cycle, microconidia could play the role of spermatia, that is, the biological elements inducing fertilisation and perithecia formation on compatible and competent strains.

Among the three previous studies describing microconidia, Chuma et al. (2009) and Zhang et al. (2014) focused on a single strain (G10-1 and 70-15, respectively), whereas Kato et al. (1994) tested 45 strains from different host plants, without quantifying microconidia production. In our experiments, 10 out of the 12 studied strains produced microconidia in quantities varying from 2.07 × 10⁴ to 1.10 × 10⁹ per ml. It is worth to note that strains from both mating types were capable of producing microconidia. Furthermore, the capacity of producing microconidia did not seem to depend on the original host of the strain either, since strains collected from *Hordeum vulgare*, *Eleusine coracana* or *Oryza sativa* produced microconidia. Morphological observations of *P. oryzae* microconidia confirmed previous studies (Chuma et al., 2009; Kato et al., 1994): they

are crescent-shaped hyaline and are two to four times smaller than macroconidia, which makes their observation harder and could explain why they were so scarcely reported in the literature.

Fertilising cells in Ascomycetes can be either unspecialised cells like macroconidia or mycelial fragments, or specialised cells, that is, microconidia (Pöggeler et al., 2018). Microconidia were proved to be spermatia in several Ascomycete species, including *Botrytis cinerea* (Fukumori et al., 2004) and *Neurospora crassa* (Maheshwari, 1999). In these two species, however, microconidia designate the male gametes, are able to germinate, and are distinct from macroconidia (often called conidia) which are asexual spores but can also be fertilising elements (Brun et al., 2021); hence both microconidia and macroconidia are spermatia in *B. cinerea* and *N. crassa*.

In *P. oryzae*, the role of microconidia as spermatia is commonly accepted, but this had never been demonstrated so far (Chuma et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2014). Here, we demonstrate that in *P. oryzae*, microconidia are the only fertilising elements, hence that they are spermatia. Contrarily to macroconidia and mycelium fragments, only microconidia sprayed on a compatible female fertile strain led to the formation of perithecia after only 3 days. In addition, the number of perithecia formed was positively correlated to the number of microconidia sprayed, confirming that microconidia have the capacity to induce perithecia formation. Reaching a plateau of perithecia formation despite growing numbers of sprayed spermatia suggests that the number of female gametes competent for fertilisation could be the limiting parameter. Although no microconidia were observed for two strains (CH0052 and BF0056), they induced the formation of perithecia on female fertile strains of the opposite mating type. We hypothesised that the two strains produce quantities of microconidia that are below the detection threshold of the counting method, that is, 4000 microconidia per ml. The apparition of perithecia after spraying
macroconidia or mycelium fragments of the male strains on a female-compatible strain was clearly delayed (15 days compared to 3 days after spraying microconidia). We hypothesised that the female strain has been fertilised by microconidia produced de novo by new thalli resulting from the growth of mycelium fragments or macroconidia germination. However, we cannot exclude that a yet unknown alternative way of fertilisation may take place when macroconidia or mycelium fragments are sprayed.

We observed that the age of the female thallus influenced its ability to produce perithecia when inoculated with spermatia of a compatible strain (Figure 9). In our conditions, a minimum age of 7 days of culture is required for female thalli to be able to produce perithecia when sprayed with spermatia. This minimum age could correspond to the time needed for female gametes to differentiate. In *Podospora anserina*, male and female gametes start to differentiate after 3 days of growth on minimal medium at optimal temperature (Coppin et al., 1997; Silar, 2011). In *P. oryzae*, other parameters such as temperature or nutrient supplies might probably also play a role on the time needed for female thalli to become competent.

Before the present study, microconidia had never been observed in our laboratory conditions despite successful in vitro crossing between strains. One explanation could be the low quantity of microconidia produced on RFA medium (the medium routinely used for growing strains and performing in vitro crosses; Nottéghem & Silué, 1992). Here, we used the modified protocol of Zhang et al. (2014) to obtain high quantity of microconidia. Sporulation is a highly variable developmental process subjected to many environmental parameters. In *N. crassa*, several external factors such as humidity, temperature or starvation have an effect on male gamete production (Debuchy et al., 2010; Maheshwari, 1999). For instance, a low concentration of carbon source and a shift from high to low temperature also facilitates the production of microconidia in *N. crassa* (Ebbole & Sachs, 1990; Rossier et al., 1977). The production of microconidia in *P. oyyzae* might also rely on specific conditions, which might be related to the fact that sexual reproduction was seldom observed in nature.

Ten strains that produced microconidia in our conditions showed significant differences in the quantity of microconidia produced. The strains OG0002 and OG0003, that were isolated from *Eleusine corocana* in the same field, produced more microconidia than other. Confirming the difference of production of microconidia between strains from different host-specific groups will require additional studies. However, differences within host-specific groups of *P. oryzae* are also worth documenting. For example, in this study, we observed significant quantitative differences in the production of microconidia between strains isolated from rice. Male fertility likely depends not only on the original host but also

on the reproduction mode of the populations or genetic groups sampled. If spermatia have no other role than fertilisation, their production is expected to decrease and to be lost in populations that are no longer experiencing sexual reproduction. *P. oryzae* populations from rice allow to test this hypothesis and to investigate the heritability and genetic bases of microconidia production.

The demonstration of the role of microconidia as spermatia allows to reconsider the definition of male fertility in *P. oryzae*. Until now, male fertility was only defined as the capacity of a strain to induce perithecia formation on a strain of opposite mating type in a cross (Nottéghem & Silué, 1992; Saleh et al., 2012a). There are several limitations to this initial definition. The use of a female auxiliary strain is necessary to assess male fertility, which introduces an additional variable parameter. A second limitation is the potential existence of prezygotic barriers. Here, we define male fertility of *P. oryzae* strains as the ability of a strain to produce male gametes (i.e., microconidia), and without crossing with a reference strain. Counting the spermatia produced will in addition permit a quantitative phenotyping of male fertility.

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors want to thank the ImagoSeine facility, member of the France Biomaging infrastructure supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR-10-INSB-04, 'Investments for the future'). AL was supported by grants of INRAE and CIRAD.

## REFERENCES

* Biju-Duval M.P. (1994) Etude de la structure génétique des populations du champignon pathogène des graminées *Magnaporthe grisea*. PhD Thesis, University Paris 6. p. 156.

* Billiard, S., López-Villavicencio, M., Hood, M.E. & Giraud, T. (2012) Sex, outcrossing and mating types: unsolved questions in fungi and beyond: sexy fungi. *Journal of Evolutionary Biology*, 25, 1020–1038.

* Bistis, G.N. (1983) Evidence for diffusible, mating-type-specific trichogynie attractants in *Neurospora crassa*. *Experimental Mycology*, 7, 292–295.

* Bistis, G.N. (1996) Trichogynes and fertilization in uni- and bimating type colonies of *Neurospora tetrasperma*. *Fungal Genetics and Biology*, 20, 93–98.

* Boddy, L. (2016) Pathogens of autotrophs. In: *The fungi*. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, pp. 245–292.

* Bruggeman, J., Debets, A., Wijngaarden, P., De Visser, J.A. & Hoekstra, R.F. (2003) Sex slows down the accumulation of deleterious mutations in the homothallic fungus *Aspergillus nidulans*. *Genetics*, 164, 479–485.

* Brun, S., Kuo, H.C., Jeffree, C.E., Thomson, D.D. & Read, N. (2021) Courtship ritual of male and female nuclei during fertilization in *Neurospora crassa*. *Microbiology spectrum*, 9(2), 00335–21.

* Chuma, I., Shinogi, T., Hosogi, N., Ikeda, K., Nakayashiki, H., Park, P. et al. (2009) Cytological characteristics of microconidia of *Magnaporthe oryzae*. *Journal of General Plant Pathology*, 75, 353–358.

* Coppin, E., Debuchy, R., Arnaise, S. & Picard, M. (1997) Mating types and sexual development in filamentous ascomycetes. *Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews*, 61(4), 411–428.
Couch, B.C., Fudal, I., Lebrun, M.-H., Tharreau, D., Valent, B., van Kim, P. et al. (2005) Origins of host-specific populations of the blast pathogen *Magnaporthe oryzae* in crop domestication with subsequent expansion of pandemic clones on rice and weeds of rice. *Genetics*, 170, 613–630.

De Meeûs, T., Prugnolle, F. & Agnew, P. (2007) Asexual reproduction: genetics and evolutionary aspects. *Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences*, 64, 1355–1372.

Dean, R.A., Talbot, N.J., Ebbole, D.J., Farman, M.L., Mitchell, T.K., Orbach, M.J. et al. (2005). The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. *Nature*, 434(7036), 980–986.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03449

Debuchy, R., Berteaux-Lecellier, V. & Silar, P. (2010) Mating systems and sexual morphogenesis in ascomycetes. In: Borkovich, E., & Ebbole, D.J. (Eds.) *Cellular and molecular biology of filamentous fungi*. Washington, USA: American Society of Microbiology, pp. 501–535.

Ebbole, D. & Sachs, M.S. (1990) A rapid and simple method for isolation of *Neurospora crassa* homokaryons using microconidia. *Fungal Genetics Reports*, 37, 7.

Fukumori, Y., Nakajima, M. & Akutsu, K. (2004) Microconidia act the role as spermatia in the sexual reproduction of *Botrytis cinerea*. *Journal of General Plant Pathology*, 70, 256–260.

Gladieux, P., Condon, B., Ravel, S., Soanes, D., Maciel, J.L.N., Nhani, A. et al. (2018a) Gene flow between divergent cereal- and grass-specific lineages of the Rice blast fungus *Magnaporthe oryzae*. *mBio*, 9, e01219-17.

Gladieux, P., Ravel, S., Rieux, A., Cros-Arteil, S., Adreit, H., Milazzo, J. et al. (2018b) Coexistence of multiple endemic and pandemic lineages of the rice blast pathogen. *mBio*, 9, e01806-17.

Kanamori, M., Kato, H., Yasuda, N., Koizumi, S., Peever, T.L., Kamakura, T. et al. (2007) Novel mating type-dependent transcripts at the mating type locus in *Magnaporthe oryzae*. *Gene*, 403, 6–17.

Kato, H., Mayama, S., Sekine, R., Kanazawa, E., Izutani, Y., Ura-shima, A., & Kunoh, H. (1994) Microconidium formation in magnaporthe grisea. *Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan*, 60, 175–185.

Kato, H., Yamamoto, M., Yamaguchi-Ozaki, T., Kadouchi, H., Iwamoto, Y., Nakayashiki, H. et al. (2000) Pathogenicity, mating ability and DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms of pyricularia populations isolated from gramineae, bambusideae and zingiberaceae plants. *Journal of General Plant Pathology*, 66(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00012919

Klaubauf, S., Tharreau, D., Fournier, E., Groenewald, J.Z., Crous, P.W., de Vries, R.P. et al. (2014) Resolving the polyphyletic nature of *Pyricularia* (Pyriculariaceae). *Studies in Mycology*, 79, 85–120.

Latorre, S.M., Reyes-Avila, C.S., Malmgren, A., Win, J., Kamoun, S. & Burbano, H.A. (2020) Differential loss of effector genes in three recently expanded pandemic clonal lineages of the rice blast fungus. *BMC Biology*, 18, 88.

Leung, H. (1988). Genetic analysis of virulence in the rice blast fungusMagnaporthe grisea. *Phytopathology*, 78(9), 1227. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-78-1227

Maheshwari, R. (1999) Microconidia of *Neurospora crassa*. *Fungal Genetics and Biology*, 26, 1–18.

Nottéghem, J.L. & Silué, D. (1992) Distribution of the mating type alleles in *Magnaporthe grisea* populations pathogenic on rice. *Phytopathology*, 82, 421–424.

Ou, S.H. (1985) *Rice diseases*, 2nd edition. Slough, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, pp. 109–201.

Peraza-Reyes, L. & Malagnac, F. (2016) Sexual development in fungi. In: Wendland, J. (Ed.) *Growth, differentiation and sexuality*. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 407–455.

Pöggeler, S., Nowrousian, M., Teichert, I., Beier, A. & Kück, U. (2018) Fruiting-body development in ascomycetes. In: Anke, T. & Schüffler, A. (Eds.) *Physiology and genetics*. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–56.

Ritz, C., Baty, F., Streibig, J.C. & Gerhard, D. (2015) Dose-response analysis using R. *PLoS One*, 10, e0146021.

Rossier, C., Ton-That, T. & Turian, G. (1977) Microcyclic microcondiation in *Neurospora crassa*. *Experimental Mycology*, 1, 52–62.

Saleh, D., Milazzo, J., Adreit, H., Fournier, E. & Tharreau, D. (2014) South-East Asia is the center of origin, diversity and dispersion of the rice blast fungus *Magnaporthe oryzae*. *The New Phytologist*, 201, 1440–1456.

Saleh, D., Milazzo, J., Adreit, H., Tharreau, D. & Fournier, E. (2012a) Asexual reproduction induces a rapid and permanent loss of sexual reproduction capacity in the rice fungal pathogen *Magnaporthe oryzae*: results of in vitro experimental evolution assays. *BMC Evolutionary Biology*, 12, 42.

Saleh, D., Xu, P., Shen, Y., Li, C., Adreit, H., Milazzo, J. et al. (2012b) Sex at the origin: an Asian population of the rice blast fungus *Magnaporthe oryzae* reproduces sexually. *Molecular Ecology*, 21, 1330–1344.

Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, S.J., Esker, P., McRoberts, N. & Nelson, A. (2019) The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. *Nature Ecology & Evolution*, 3, 430–439.

Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T. et al. (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. *Nature Methods*, 9, 676–682.

Silar, P. (2011) Grafting as a method for studying development in the filamentous fungus *Podospora anserina*. *Fungal Biology*, 115(8), 793–802.

Stukenbrock, E.H. & McDonald, B.A. (2008) The origins of plant pathogens in agro-ecosystems. *Annual Review of Phytopathology*, 46, 75–100.

Tanaka, M., Nakayashiki, H., & Tosa, Y. (2009). Population structure of Eleusine isolates of Pyricularia oryzae and its evolutionary implications. *Journal of General Plant Pathology*, 75(3), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-009-0158-0

Tharreau, D., Fudal, I., Andriantsimialona, D., Santoso, Utami, D., Fournier, E., Lebrun, M.-H. et al. (2009) World population structure and migration of the rice blast fungus, *Magnaporthe oryzae*. In: Wang, G.-L. & Valent, B. (Eds.) *Advances in genetics, genomics and control of rice blast disease*. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 209–215.

Thierry, M., Charriat, F., Milazzo, J., Adreit, H., Ravel, S., Cros-Arteil, S. et al. (2022). Maintenance of divergent lineages of the Rice Blast Fungus Pyricularia oryzae through niche separation, loss of sex and post-mating genetic incompatibilities. *PLOS Pathogens*, 18(7), e1010687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1010687

Valent, B., Crawford, M.S., Weaver, C.G. & Chumley, F.G. (1986) *Genetic studies of fertility and pathogenicity in Magnaporthe grisea* (*Pyricularia oryzae*). USA: Iowa State Journal of Research.

Zeigler, R.S. (1998) Recombination in *Magnaporthe grisea*. *Annual Review of Phytopathology*, 36, 249–275.

Zhang, H., Wu, Z., Wang, C., Li, Y. & Xu, J.R. (2014) Germination and infectivity of microconidia in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. *Nature Communications*, 5, 4518.

**How to cite this article:** Lassagne, A., Brun, S., Malagnac, F., Adreit, H., Milazzo, J., Fournier, E. et al. (2022) Male fertility in *Pyricularia oryzae*: Microconidia are spermatia. *Environmental Microbiology*, 1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16226