# A Stress Hub in Scedosporium apiospermum: The High Osmolarity Glycerol (HOG) Pathway

Hajar Yaakoub, Sara Mina, Agnès Marot, Nicolas Papon, Alphonse Calenda,

Jean-Philippe Bouchara

► To cite this version:

Hajar Yaakoub, Sara Mina, Agnès Marot, Nicolas Papon, Alphonse Calenda, et al. A Stress Hub in Scedosporium apiospermum: The High Osmolarity Glycerol (HOG) Pathway. Kinases and Phosphatases, 2022, 1 (1), pp.4-13. 10.3390/kinasesphosphatases1010002. hal-04480264

HAL Id: hal-04480264

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04480264v1

Submitted on 3 Dec 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
A Stress Hub in *Scedosporium apiospermum*: The High Osmolarity Glycerol (HOG) Pathway

Hajar Yaakoub ¹,†, Sara Mina ²,† ID, Agnès Marot ¹, Nicolas Papon ¹,* ID, Alphonse Calenda ¹,* and Jean-Philippe Bouchara ¹,∗

¹ Univ Angers, IRF, SFR ICAT, F-49000 Angers, France

² Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Beirut Arab University, Beirut P.O. Box 11-5020, Lebanon

* Correspondence: nicolas.papon@univ-angers.fr (N.P.); alphonse.calenda@univ-angers.fr (A.C.); jean-philippe.bouchara@univ-angers.fr (J.-P.B.)

† The authors contributed equally to this work.

**Abstract:** *Scedosporium* species are opportunistic filamentous fungi found in human-impacted areas. Clinically relevant species, such as *S. apiospermum*, rank as the second most frequent colonizers of the airways of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), which are characterized by persistent oxidative stress. This raises the question of how *Scedosporium* species abate conditions imposed in hostile environments. Since the High Osmolarity Glycerol (HOG) pathway plays a central role in fungal adaptation to stress, we aimed to pheno-profile the involvement of the pathway in response to stress in *S. apiospermum* using Western blot. We show for the first time that a wide range of stress distinctively activates the HOG pathway in *S. apiospermum*, including oxidants (H₂O₂, menadione, cumene hydroperoxide, diamide, paraquat, and honokiol), osmotic agents (sorbitol and KCl), cell-wall stress agents (caffeine, calcofluor white, and Congo Red), heavy metals (cadmium and arsenite), fungicides (fludioxonil and iprodione), antifungals (voriconazole and amphotericin B), and acid stress (pH 4). We suggest that the function of the HOG pathway as a general stress regulator is also conserved in *S. apiospermum*.

**Keywords:** stress adaptation; signaling pathway; fungi

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Yaakoub, H.; Mina, S.; Marot, A.; Papon, N.; Calenda, A.; Bouchara, J.-P. A Stress Hub in *Scedosporium apiospermum*: The High Osmolarity Glycerol (HOG) Pathway. *Kinases Phosphatases* **2023**, *1*, 4–13.
https://doi.org/10.3390/kinasesphosphatases1010002

Academic Editor: Mauro Salvi

Received: 16 October 2022

Revised: 5 November 2022

Accepted: 17 November 2022

Published: 21 November 2022

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2022 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).

# 1. Introduction

*Scedosporium* species are opportunistic filamentous fungi belonging to the *Microascaceae* family. Among the ten species that have been so far identified in the *Scedosporium* genus, only *S. apiospermum*, *S. boydii*, *S. aurantiacum*, and *S. minutisporum* are clinically relevant [1]. These fungi are mesophilic, eutrophic, and environmental saprophytes frequently found in human-impacted areas, including industrial regions and wastewater [2]. When introduced into the human body by inhalation and/or traumatic injury, conidia of these species are virulent enough to cause infections in both healthy and immunocompromised subjects, with attributable mortality of alarming rates in the case of disseminated infections [3]. One example of a vulnerable population is patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), whose airways are often chronically colonized by *S. apiospermum*, *S. boydii*, and *S. aurantiacum*. Colonized patients are usually not at risk of invasive pulmonary infections unless lung transplantation takes place [4,5]. In addition to their therapy-refractory nature, the treatment of infections caused by these species is impinged by their nocuous virulent features that lead to irreparable harm to invaded tissues. This includes the presence of cell wall components with immunomodulatory effects, the secretion of proteins and metabolites that promote the ability to establish infections, and the attitude of the fungus toward the stressful conditions imposed in the host [6–8]. In this regard, and since the release of the first whole-genome sequencing of *S. apiospermum* [9], special attention has been paid to the antioxidant repertoire that permits the fungus to modulate host-imposed oxidative stress. Genomic and transcriptomic studies have elicited the key involvement of specific antioxidant enzymes in
the tolerance of *S. apiospermum* to chemically derived oxidants and phagocytes-mediated killing, such as the conidia-specific Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase (SOD), the thioredoxin reductases (TrxR), and SaPrx2 (a peroxiredoxin) [10–12]. Such evidence relative to the behavior of *Scedosporium* in their natural niches and the human host infers that the ability of these fungi to adapt to stress is high. As a matter of fact, it is assumptive that the cellular response to any threats should have been operated by cellular regulators. As the stress-signaling pathways in *Scedosporium* are still completely unexplored, deciphering the signaling pathways, especially that related to oxidative stress, is needed in order to pave the way for new therapeutic approaches.

The broad diversity of fungal niches has always been attractive for fundamental research, which provided a paradigm of adaptation to stress in the eukaryotic world. As a matter of fact, the ability of fungi to evoke adaptive responses to unforeseen conditions relies on sensor-effector complex networks that orchestrate global cellular reprogramming. One of the most conclusive pieces of evidence in this regard states that the high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway constitutes the key molecular apparatus that accounts for fungal adaptation to myriad types of stress [13,14]. This is also reflected by the fact that Hog1, a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family and the key element in the HOG pathway, is highly conserved in the fungal kingdom regardless of the species niche (identity of 80 to 100%) [15]. When activated under stress, the HOG pathway undergoes sequential reactions of phosphorylation of its three tiers: MAP kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK), MAP kinase kinase (MAPKK), and Hog1 MAPK (Figure 1) [16]. The activation of the latter is represented by dual phosphorylation on its TGY (Threonine-Glycine-Tyrosine) motif, thus allowing the Hog1-mediated transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of cellular targets. The shuttling of cues to the HOG pathway is mainly facilitated by a two-component system (TCS), which is a multi-step histidine-aspartate phosphorelay system formed by a hybrid histidine kinase (HK), and a histidine-containing phosphotransfer protein (HPT) acting as a mediator between HK and a response regulator [17]. Although formed by a limited number of components, the HOG pathway intriguingly constitutes a nexus regulator required to instigate fine-tuned responses to diverse stress, including osmotic, oxidative, antifungals, heat, acid, ethanol, and many others [13,14]. Interestingly, recent findings outlined that the HOG pathway plays a critical role in the adaptation of strains of *Aspergillus fumigatus* to the lung microenvironment, including CF lungs [18,19].

In light of the nodal role played by the HOG pathway in fungal adaptive responses, we intended to probe the role of this pathway in the tolerance of *S. apiospermum* to stress, with a focus on oxidative stress. The established methodology was based on functional genomic approaches to produce mutants devoid of pathway components and to verify the phosphorylation of Hog1 in response to various stresses by Western blot. Here, we present the first record of the stress-induced phosphorylation of Hog1 in *S. apiospermum* (SaHog1). We report distinct responsiveness of SaHog1 to several types of stress, suggesting that the HOG pathway constitutes a stress Hub in *S. apiospermum*.
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** The High Osmolarity Glycerol (HOG) pathway and the Two-Component System (TCS) signaling pathways in fungi. TCS model in fungi is a four-step histidine (His)-aspartate (Asp) phosphorelay system formed by one or more hybrid histidine kinases (HK), a histidine-containing phosphotransfer protein (HPT), and at least one response regulator (RR). Once HK detects signals through its sensing domain, it auto-phosphorylates on the histidinyl (His) residue in the histidine kinase domain, followed by the phosphorylation of the aspartyl (Asp) residue in its receiver domain</figcaption></figure>
(RD). The phosphate group is then transferred to the His residue in the HPT, which in turn activates the RR on the Asp residue. Depending on the input, fungal TCS can feed into one or more Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathways. When the input consists of stress, the HOG pathway is most likely to intervene. Once activated, the HOG pathway undergoes sequential reactions of phosphorylation of its three tiers: Ssk2 MAP kinase kinase kinase (MAPK3), Pbs2 MAP kinase kinase (MAPK2), and Hog1 MAPK. The dual phosphorylation of Hog1 on its threonyl (Thr) and tyrosyl (Tyr) residues allows Hog1 to translocate to the nucleus and regulate the stress-dependent response. The kinetics of the stress-induced phosphorylation of Hog1 may therefore mirror the stress-specific regulatory roles of activated Hog1.

## 2. Results

### 2.1. SaHog1 Is Highly Conserved

Bioinformatic analysis showed that Hog1 is encoded in the genome of S. apiospermum IHEM 14462, by the gene SAPIO_CDS7351. Unlike Aspergillus genomes which harbor two paralogs of Hog1 [20,21], the genome of S. apiospermum IHEM 14462 comprises only one copy. The cladogram analysis of fungal Hog1 shown in Figure 2 reveals that SaHog1 (XP_016641060.1) belongs to the Hog1 cluster that is different from the Ssk1 response regulator cluster. Identity analysis shows that fungal Hog1 is more conserved than fungal Ssk1 response regulator, supporting findings brought by Nikolaou et al. [15]. SaHog1 (XP_016641060.1) is most and least identical to that of Fusarium oxysporum (92.72%) and Candida albicans (78.50%), supporting that it is highly conserved regardless of the phylogenetic distance. SaHog1 is of 357 amino acids in length, and the estimated molecular mass is 41.9 kDa.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

**Figure 2.** Cladogram analysis of fungal Hog1 MAPK and Ssk1 response regulator. The cladogram was generated with Clustal Omega using the protein sequences as inputs. Species names and sequence accession numbers are the following: *Saccharomyces cerevisiae* (Sc), NP_013214.1 (SchHog1), KAG2513672.1 (SaSsk1); *Candida albicans* (Ca), KAF6065155.1 (CaHog1), KHC88809.1 (CaSsk1); *Cryptococcus neoformans* (Cn), XP_012052578.1 (CnHog1), XP_012047235.1 (CnSsk1); *Schizosaccharomyces pombe* (Sp), NP_592843.1 (SpSty1, Hog1 ortholog), NP_596484.1 (SpMcs4, Ssk1 ortholog); *Aspergillus fumigatus* (Af), EAL90626.1 (AfSakA, Hog1 ortholog), EAL91759.1 (AfSskA); *Talaromyces marneffei* (Tm), XP_002146247.1 (TmSakA, Hog1 ortholog), XP_002147455.1 (TmSsk1); *Scedosporium apiospermum* (Sa), XP_016641060.1 (SaHog1), XP_016642576.1 (SaSsk1); *Fusarium oxysporum* (Fo), RKL37088.1 (FoHog1), EWY89392.1 (FoSsk1). Fungal Ssk1 included in the analysis served as an outgroup. The pairwise identities of fungal Hog1 and Ssk1 to SaHog1 and SaSsk1 were determined using BLASTp.
## 2.2. The Phosphorylation of SaHog1 Is Triggered by Many Stresses

The Western blot analysis showed that the phosphorylation of SaHog1 is induced in 18 out of the 20 tested conditions in comparison to unstressed conditions (Figure 3). The two conditions that had no discernable effect on the phosphorylation of SaHog1 are the thermal stress (45 °C) and the hypercapnia (5% CO₂). Interestingly, the kinetics of phosphorylation were diverse even within the same group of conditions. The kinetics for each group of stresses are described below.

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

**Figure 3.** Phosphorylation of SaHog1 in response to stressful agents. The phosphorylation of SaHog1 MAPK (P-Hog1) was investigated by Western blot in *S. apiospermum* IHEM 14462 challenged with the indicated stress for 15, 30, 60, and 120 min. Phosphorylated SaHog1 was revealed using the phospho-p38 MAP kinase antibody (9211S, Cell-signaling Technology). Total Hog1 was detected using anti-Hog1 (y-215) (sc-9079, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Note that according to its molecular mass (estimated at 41.9 kDa), SaHog1 corresponds to the lower band. Since the anti-Hog1 (y-215) targets a C-terminal epitope of 215 aa, this would result in non-specific binding to homolog proteins. For example, the Cell-Wall Integrity (CWI) MAPK known as Mccl (XP_016645022.1) shares 43.63% homology with SaHog1, and it is of 47 kDa. Thus, we assume Mccl corresponds to the higher band.

**Oxidative stress:** All oxidative stress conditions (10 mM H₂O₂, 2 mM menadione, 4 mM cumene hydroperoxide, 4 mM diamide, 4 mM paraquat, and 20 µg/mL honokiol) triggered the robust phosphorylation of SaHog1. However, the kinetics of phosphorylation were not always the same. The stress imposed by H₂O₂, honokiol, or paraquat-induced the rapid activation of SaHog1, with a maximum induction since the first 15 min, followed by an incremental decrease in intensity with time, so that the phosphorylation was barely detected after 120 min of incubation. The cumene- and diamide-induced phosphorylation of SaHog1 stress occurred at a slower pace; phosphorylation, weakly detected at 15 min, reached its maximum at 30 min, and then decreased with time. Treatment with menadione induced the very slow activation of SaHog1, with the maximum intensity attained at the latest tested time point (120 min).

**Osmotic stress:** Sorbitol and KCl (both at 1.4 M) induced the strong phosphorylation of SaHog1 with comparable patterns. The intensity of phosphorylation was sustained regardless of the time.

**Cell wall stress:** The cell wall-imposing agents like caffeine, calcofluor white, and Congo Red (all at 30 µg/mL) promoted the phosphorylation of SaHog1 in distinct kinetics.
The caffeine-induced activation of SaHog1 was rapid and transient, while that induced by calcofluor white was slow and prolonged. Using Congo Red, a "discrete-activation effect" was observed, meaning that SaHog1 phosphorylation declined between two increases; at 30 min of stress, Congo Red-induced phosphorylated SaHog1 returned to nearly its basal level of phosphorylation before it arose again. This effect was reproducible even when different experimental runs were used.

**Heavy metal stress:** The activation of SaHog1 by cadmium [Cd (NO₃)₂, 50 µM] and arsenite (As₂O₃, 800 µM) was kinetically different. Cadmium also exhibited a discrete-activation effect; SaHog1 underwent intense activation within 15 min of exposure, then returned to a normal level 30 min before it was prompted again by 60 min. On the other hand, arsenite triggered the rapid and temporal activation of SaHog1.

**Fungicide stress:** The phenylpyrrole fludioxonil (20 µg/mL) also induced a discontinued activation pattern, with a marked activation of SaHog1 at 15 min followed by a decreased phosphorylation and its re-activation at 120 min. By contrast, exposure to the dicarboximide iprodione (20 µg/mL) resulted in a delayed and prolonged induction of SaHog1 phosphorylation.

**Other stress:** Voriconazole and amphotericin B (both at 16 µg/mL), as well as acid pH (pH 4), stimulated the time-independent and moderate phosphorylation of SaHog1, while the basal level of phosphorylated SaHog1 remained intact when challenged with thermal and hypercapnia stress.

Overall, these results infer that the role of the HOG pathway as a general stress-activated pathway is conserved in *S. apiospermum* and that SaHog1 responds to stress in an agent-dependent fashion.

### 3. Discussion

*Scedosporium* species are typical opportunistic fungi. Infections caused by these fungi are difficult to treat and are associated with high mortality rates when they take place in immunocompromised patients, such as lung transplant recipients [4]. These fungi are also renowned for being the second most frequent fungal colonizers of the CF airways, after *A. fumigatus* [4]. One questionable aspect that could be raised from these observations is the ability to tolerate immune defenses, especially oxidative-mediated killing, which is a prerequisite to persist in the CF airways. Previous studies in *S. apiospermum* showed that the fungus harbor a set of 33 genes encoding a battery of putative antioxidant enzymes, of which the expression was distinctly induced by exposure to oxidative stress derived from chemicals or phagocytes [10–12,22]. These enzymes arguably constitute one side of commander-effector networks of signaling pathways. On the other side, the natural occurrence of these fungi in polluted regions [2] also denotes the existence of signaling pathways orchestrating protective responses against unpredictable events. These pathways have never been addressed in *Scedosporium*. Knowledge gathered on fungal signaling pathways functioning during stress prioritized starting the investigations with the HOG pathway since it is the most cardinal general stress regulator in fungi [13]. We intended, therefore, to identify the role of the HOG pathway in the tolerance of *S. apiospermum* to stresses that are likely to be encountered in hostile environments, with particular attention to oxidative stress. Probing the phosphorylation of SaHog1 in conditions of stress using Western blot appeared to be a reliable way to verify its involvement. A bioinformatic analysis in the *S. apiospermum* IHEM 14462 genome was required to ensure the dosage of gene-encoding SaHog1 and its conservation degree. We showed that SaHog1 is highly identical to fungal Hog1 regardless of the harboring species, which agrees with the high conservation degrees of Hog1 in fungi [15]. Western blot experiments demonstrated that SaHog1 is a multi-stress-responding MAPK kinase as it boosts its activity upon a variety of stressful conditions, including oxidants (H₂O₂, menadione, cumene hydroperoxide, diamide, paraquat, and honokiol), osmotic agents (sorbitol and KCl), cell-wall stress agents (caffeine, calcofluor white, and Congo Red), heavy metals (cadmium and arsenite), fungicides (fludioxonil and iprodione), antifungals (voriconazole and amphotericin B),
and acid stress (pH 4). This is consistent with the fact that many of these conditions have already been identified as activators of Hog1 in other fungal species, which were recently reviewed elsewhere [13,14]. To the best of our knowledge, we report for the first time that voriconazole is an activator of the HOG pathway in fungi.

The other interesting concept we exposed here is the diverse kinetics of stress-induced phosphorylation of SaHog1. This occurred even within the same group of stress, such as in the case of oxidative, parietal, heavy metal, and fungicide stress. For each of these groups, the agents tested display their proper mode of action, which reasonably drives stress-specific responses, and perhaps the stress-specific activation kinetics of SaHog1. Taking oxidative stress as an example, genetic screening studies performed in *S. cerevisiae* helped to unveil the mechanisms required to respond to such stress. The inorganic peroxide H₂O₂ leads to the formation of reactive hydroxyl radicals OH• via Fenton and Haber-Weiss reactions. Therefore, a protective response heavily depends on genes with mitochondrial respiratory functions. Likewise, honokiol is believed to induce mitochondrial dysfunction, which leads to the increased intracellular accumulation of superoxide anion O₂•⁻ and the activation of H₂O₂-related transcriptional response in fungi [23–27]. As for cumene, it is an organic hydroperoxide inducing lipid oxidation; therefore, yeast cells require genes with functions in transcriptional regulation and vacuolar acidification [28]. In contrast, menadione and paraquat are redox-cycling compounds that transfer electrons from electron carriers to the oxygen molecule to produce O₂•⁻. Surviving their odd effect requires a functional pentose phosphate pathway able to maintain NADPH flux [28]. Diamide depletes the pool of reduced glutathione by oxidizing thiol groups. In response, yeast cells employ endoplasmic reticulum protein sorting and vacuolar protein targeting and translocation [28]. Hence, we postulate that different kinetics observed here reflect that SaHog1 plays distinct regulatory roles. Moreover, sorbitol and KCl, which are believed to act osmotically the same, generated comparable kinetics. In fact, although osmotic stress agents are chemically different, their main effect on cells is the loss of turgor pressure. It was shown that the nuclear enrichment of *S. cerevisiae* Hog1 occurs within tens of seconds post-osmotic shock and gradually decreases as soon as turgor pressure begins to restore, and this adaptation was not specific to the chemical nature of the stimulus [29].

Another hypothesis that explains the distinct kinetics of phosphorylation of SaHog1 is that some stress types prompt negative and/or positive interplays between the HOG pathway and other regulatory pathways, which would affect the activities of each pathway throughout the time of exposure to stress. Reports in this regard highlight mutualistic relationships between the fungal HOG pathway and the Cell-Wall Integrity (CWI) pathway, thus allowing a cross-protection against cell-wall disturbing agents but also cadmium and heat upshift [13,30]. Taking this into account, one cannot disregard that the discrete activation effect seen for Congo Red and cadmium stress may reflect opposing interplays between the SaHOG and SaCWI pathways, in which the activity of SaHog1 is weakened when the other pathway is activated.

The activation of SaHog1 to fungicides like fludioxonil was expected. From a mechanistic point of view, the drug is toxic to fungal cells due to the hyperactivation of Hog1 mediated by HK group III that is characterized by HAMP domains (histidine kinases/adenylyl cyclases/methyl-accepting receptors/phosphatases) [13,31]. Unpublished work revealed that among the eight genes encoding HKs in the genome of *S. apiospermum* IHEM 14462, one encodes a group III HK, which justifies the activation of SaHog1 to the drug. Antifungals like fluconazole, caspofungin, and amphotericin B have already been reported as activators of fungal Hog1, but the involved mechanisms remain overlooked [13]. It is worth mentioning that the activation of SaHog1 to amphotericin B and voriconazole may be due to drug-associated secondary effects rather than to the mode of action. For instance, amphotericin B is known to promote nascent intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), although its fungicidal activity is only due to interaction with ergosterol [32]. Fluconazole was also shown to induce ROS [32]. Whether the same applies to voriconazole-induced activation of SaHog1 needs further investigation.
With regard to the responsiveness of SaHog1 to stress, we may postulate that the SaHOG pathway participates in the occurrence of these fungi in nature by rendering them recalcitrant to toxic events. The pathway may also contribute to fungal persistence in CF lungs since both oxidative and acid stress, which are characteristic of CF airways, induced the phosphorylation of SaHog1. Nevertheless, based on current findings, it is still premature to draw any definitive conclusion. This work should be ensued with functional genomic experiments to allow the identification of the downstream effectors of the SaHOG pathway, such as transcription factors and regulated genes. In addition, the identification of the upstream regulators of the HOG pathway will also help dissect whether stress signals are always relayed via TCS or non-canonical routes.

**4. Materials and Methods**

**4.1. Identification of HOG1 Gene**

The protein sequence of the Hog1 of the budding yeast *S. cerevisiae* S288C was used as a query input against *S. apiospermum* IHEM 14462 in BLAST (taxid: 563466). Once the *SaHOG1* gene was identified, the relative protein sequence was then blasted against the harboring genome to check the presence of paralogs. Cladogram analysis of fungal Hog1 was performed using Clustal Omega.

**4.2. Culture and Stress of Fungi**

The strain *S. apiospermum* IHEM 14462 was cultured for 9 days at 37 °C on yeast extract-peptone-dextrose agar (YPDA, containing in g/L: yeast extract, 5; pancreatic peptone, 10; glucose, 20; bacteriological agar, 20; and chloramphenicol, 0.5). The conidia were sterilely harvested in distilled water and filtered using Miracloth membranes. Fifteen microliters of the conidial suspension (2.5 × 10² conidia/mL) were spread on sterile cellophane membranes (autoclaved in water) laid on the surface of YPDA plates. The plates were then incubated for 7 days at 37 °C in the dark (to sidestep the potential light-induced phosphorylation of Hog1). Cellophane membranes, on which fungal colonies were grown, were then delicately removed from the original plates and placed on freshly prepared YPDA plates supplemented or not with the stressful agents. Tested stress included osmotic, oxidative, parietal, heavy metals, acid, and antifungals. The plates were reversed and left at room temperature (25 °C) and in the dark for 15, 30, 60, or 120 min. In the case of stress with high temperature (45 °C), colonies-containing cellophane membranes were laid on new YPDA plates that had already been incubated at 45 °C for a short time (30 min), and then the plates were left lidless and re-incubated at 45 °C, in the dark, for the indicated times. The plates were also left lidless in case of hypercapnia stress (5% CO₂). Afterwards, the cellophane membranes were removed, covered with aluminum foils, and put in liquid nitrogen. The samples were then lyophilized for 48 h and stored at -80 °C until use. Lyophilized colonies were put in 1.5 mL microtubes (100 µg of fungal biomass per tube) and proceeded to total protein extraction.

**4.3. Protein Extraction and Electrophoresis**

One milliliter of ice-cold, freshly prepared extraction Laemmli buffer (62.5 mM Tris, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, and 2.5% β-mercaptoethanol) supplemented with 1 mM phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) was added to sample tubes. After the addition of glass beads, tubes were vigorously shaken in a Mini-bead beater (Retsch™ MM 200) 4 times for 30 s with 30 s of incubation on ice in between. Tubes were then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were transferred to a new 1.5 mL microtube tube. Protein samples were stored at -20 °C until use. The protein concentration was determined using Pierce™ Microplate BCA Protein Assay Kit—Reducing Agent Compatible (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For protein separation using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, samples were diluted in loading buffer and heated in boiling water for 2 min, and equal amounts of proteins (75 µg) were deposited into the wells of 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The ladder used was PageRuler™ Plus Prestained Protein Ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Gels
were then electro-transferred to an Immuno-blot PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad) and blocked
with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The
membranes were left overnight at 4 °C in the blocking buffer and then washed 3 times (PBS
with 0.05% Tween-20) for 5 min before the performance of immunoblotting.

4.4. Western Blot

The anti-Hog1 (y-215) polyclonal antibody (sc-9079, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), kindly given by Pr. Thomas Guillemette (IRHS, Angers, France), was used to detect total SaHog1 at a 1:1000 dilution in PBS containing 0.3% BSA and 0.05% Tween-20. Given that the probing of total Hog1 serves as a loading control, we also ensured the validity of the anti-Hog1 (y-215) by probing in parallel the actin amount using as the primary antibody a rabbit anti-β-actin polyclonal antibody (GTX109639, GeneTex) diluted to 1:5000 in the same dilution buffer. To detect phosphorylated SaHog1, the phospho-p38 MAP kinase polyclonal antibody (9211S, Cell-signaling Technology) was used as the primary antibody at a 1:1000 dilution. The membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature under gentle agitation. After washing 3 times with the washing solution (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20), the membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibodies (7074S, Cell signaling Technology) used at a 1:1000 dilution. Signals were detected by chemiluminescence on LAS4000 (GE Healthcare) after a 5 min incubation of the membranes with Clarity™ Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad).

**Author Contributions:** H.Y. and S.M. contributed equally to the conduct of the experiments. H.Y. and A.M. developed the protocols. H.Y. wrote the manuscript. A.C., N.P. and J.-P.B. supervised this work and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** H.Y. was supported by a fellowship from the AZM association (#AWS-LOG298/2017, Lebanon).

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

**References**

1. Ramirez-Garcia, A.; Pellon, A.; Rementeria, A.; Buldain, I.; Barreto-Bergter, E.; Rollin-Pinheiro, R.; de Meirelles, J.V.; Xisto, M.; Ranque, S.; Havlicek, V.; et al. *Scedosporium* and *Lomentospora*: An updated overview of underrated opportunists. *Med. Mycol.* **2018**, *56*, 102–125. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Rougeron, A.; Giraud, S.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Cano-Lira, J.F.; Rainer, J.; Mouhajir, A.; Le Gal, S.; Nevez, G.; Meyer, W.; Bouchara, J.P. Ecology of *Scedosporium* species: Present knowledge and future research. *Mycopathologia* **2018**, *183*, 185–200. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Seidel, D.; Meissner, A.; Lackner, M.; Piepenbrock, E.; Salmanton-Garcia, J.; Stecher, M.; Mellinghoff, S.; Hamprecht, A.; Duran Graeff, L.; Kohler, P.; et al. Prognostic factors in 264 adults with invasive *Scedosporium* spp. and *Lomentospora prolificans* infection reported in the literature and FungiScope®. *Crit. Rev. Microbiol.* **2019**, *45*, 1–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Bouchara, J.P.; Le Govic, Y.; Kabbara, S.; Cimon, B.; Zouhair, R.; Hamze, M.; Papon, N.; Nevez, G. Advances in understanding and managing *Scedosporium* respiratory infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. *Expert Rev. Respir. Med.* **2020**, *14*, 259–273. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5. Schwarz, C.; Eschenhagen, P.; Bouchara, J.P. Emerging fungal threats in cystic fibrosis. *Mycopathologia* **2021**, *186*, 639–653. [CrossRef]

6. Mello, T.P.; Bittencourt, V.C.B.; Liporagi Lopes, L.C.; Aor, A.C.; Branquinha, M.H.; Santos, A.L.S. Insights into the social life and obscure side of *Scedosporium/Lomentospora* species: Ubiquitous, emerging and multidrug-resistant opportunistic pathogens. *Fungal Biol. Rev.* **2019**, *33*, 16–46. [CrossRef]

7. Rollin-Pinheiro, R.; Xisto, M.; Rochetti, V.P.; Barreto-Bergter, E. *Scedosporium* cell wall: From carbohydrate-containing structures to host-pathogen interactions. *Mycopathologia* **2020**, *185*, 931–946. [CrossRef]

8. Vandeputte, P.; Dugé de Bernonville, T.; Le Govic, Y.; Le Gal, S.; Nevez, G.; Papon, N.; Bouchara, J.P. Comparative transcriptome analysis unveils the adaptative mechanisms of *Scedosporium apiospermum* to the microenvironment encountered in the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis. *Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J.* **2020**, *18*, 3468–3483. [CrossRef]
9. Vandeputte, P.; Ghamrawi, S.; Rechenmann, M.; Iltis, A.; Giraud, S.; Fleury, M.; Thornton, C.; Delhaes, L.; Meyer, W.; Papon, N.; et al. Draft genome sequence of the pathogenic fungus *Scedosporium apiospermum*. *Genome Announc.* **2014**, *2*, e00988-14. [CrossRef]

10. Staerck, C.; Yaakoub, H.; Vandeputte, P.; Tabiasco, J.; Godon, C.; Gastebois, A.; Giraud, S.; Guillemette, T.; Calenda, A.; Delneste, Y.; et al. The Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored superoxide dismutase of *Scedosporium apiospermum* protects the conidia from oxidative stress. *J. Fungi* **2021**, *7*, 575. [CrossRef]

11. Yaakoub, H.; Staerck, C.; Mina, S.; Godon, C.; Fleury, M.J.J.; Bouchara, J.P.; Calenda, A. Repurposing of auranofin and honokiol as antifungals against *Scedosporium* species and the related fungus *Lomentospora prolificans*. *Virulence* **2021**, *12*, 1076-1090. [CrossRef]

12. Staerck, C.; Tabiasco, J.; Godon, C.; Delneste, Y.; Bouchara, J.P.; Fleury, M.J.J. Transcriptional profiling of *Scedosporium apiospermum* enzymatic antioxidant gene battery unravels the involvement of thioredoxin reductases against chemical and phagocytic cells oxidative stress. *Med. Mycol.* **2019**, *57*, 363-373. [CrossRef]

13. Yaakoub, H.; Sanchez, N.S.; Ongay-Larios, L.; Courdavault, V.; Calenda, A.; Bouchara, J.P.; Coria, R.; Papon, N. The high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway in fungi. *Crit. Rev. Microbiol.* **2021**, *657-695*. [CrossRef]

14. Yaakoub, H.; Mina, S.; Calenda, A.; Bouchara, J.P.; Papon, N. Oxidative stress response pathways in fungi. *Cell. Mol. Life Sci.* **2022**, *79*, 333. [CrossRef]

15. Nikolaou, E.; Agrafioti, I.; Stumpf, M.; Quinn, J.; Stansfield, I.; Brown, A.J.P. Phylogenetic diversity of stress signalling pathways in fungi. *BMC Evol. Biol.* **2009**, *9*, 44. [CrossRef]

16. Marshall, C.J. MAP kinase kinase kinase, MAP kinase kinase and MAP kinase. *Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.* **1994**, *4*, 82-89. [CrossRef]

17. Singh, D.; Gupta, P.; Singla-Pareek, S.L.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Pareek, A. The journey from two-step to multi-step phosphorelay signaling systems. *Curr. Genom.* **2021**, *22*, 59-74. [CrossRef]

18. Ross, B.S.; Lofgren, L.A.; Ashare, A.; Stajich, J.E.; Cramer, R.A. *Aspergillus fumigatus* in-host HOG pathway mutation for cystic fibrosis lung microenvironment persistence. *mBio* **2021**, *12*, e0215321. [CrossRef]

19. Kirkland, M.E.; Stannard, M.; Kowalski, C.H.; Mould, D.; Caffrey-Carr, A.; Temple, R.M.; Ross, B.S.; Lofgren, L.A.; Stajich, J.E.; Cramer, R.A.; et al. Host Lung Environment Limits Aspergillus fumigatus Germination through an SskA-Dependent Signaling Response. *mSphere* **2021**, *6*, e0092221. [CrossRef]

20. Hagiwara, D.; Suzuki, S.; Kamei, K.; Gonoi, T.; Kawamoto, S. The role of AtfA and HOG MAPK pathway in stress tolerance in conidia of *Aspergillus fumigatus*. *Fungal Genet. Biol.* **2014**, *73*, 138-149. [CrossRef]

21. Bruder Nascimento, A.C.; Dos Reis, T.F.; de Castro, P.A.; Hori, J.I.; Bom, V.L.; de Assis, L.J.; Ramalho, L.N.; Rocha, M.C.; Malavazi, I.; Brown, N.A.; et al. Mitogen activated protein kinases SakA(HOG1) and MpkC collaborate for *Aspergillus fumigatus* virulence. *Mol. Microbiol.* **2016**, *100*, 841-859. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. Staerck, C.; Vandeputte, P.; Gastebois, A.; Calenda, A.; Giraud, S.; Papon, N.; Bouchara, J.P.; Fleury, M.J.J. Enzymatic Mechanisms Involved in Evasion of Fungi to the Oxidative Stress: Focus on Scedosporium apiospermum. *Mycopathologia* **2018**, *183*, 227-239. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23. Ma, D.; Cui, X.; Zhang, Z.; Li, B.; Xu, Y.; Tian, S.; Chen, T. Honokiol suppresses mycelial growth and reduces virulence of *Botrytis cinerea* by inducing autophagic activities and apoptosis. *Food Microbiol.* **2020**, *88*, 103411. [CrossRef]

24. Sun, L.M.; Liao, K.; Wang, D. Honokiol induces superoxide production by targeting mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I in *Candida albicans*. *PLoS ONE* **2017**, *12*, e0184003. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25. Wang, Z.; Shen, Y. Antifungal compound honokiol triggers oxidative stress responsive signalling pathway and modulates central carbon metabolism. *Mycology* **2016**, *7*, 124-133. [CrossRef]

26. Zhu, X.; Cai, J.; Zhou, F.; Wu, Z.; Li, D.; Li, Y.; Xie, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Liang, Y. Genome-wide screening of budding yeast with honokiol to associate mitochondrial function with lipid metabolism. *Traffic* **2018**, *19*, 867-878. [CrossRef]

27. Sun, L.; Liao, K.; Hang, C.; Wang, D. Honokiol induces reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis in Candida albicans through mitochondrial dysfunction. *PLoS ONE* **2017**, *12*, e0172228. [CrossRef]

28. Thorpe, G.W.; Fong, C.S.; Alic, N.; Higgins, V.J.; Dawes, I.W. Cells have distinct mechanisms to maintain protection against different reactive oxygen species: Oxidative-stress-response genes. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **2004**, *101*, 6564-6569. [CrossRef]

29. Muzzey, D.; Gomez-Uribe, C.A.; Mettetal, J.T.; van Oudenaarden, A. A systems-level analysis of perfect adaptation in yeast osmoregulation. *Cell* **2009**, *138*, 160-171. [CrossRef]

30. Gonzalez-Parraga, P.; Alonso-Monge, R.; Pla, J.; Arguelles, J.C. Adaptive tolerance to oxidative stress and the induction of antioxidant enzymatic activities in *Candida albicans* are independent of the Hog1 and Cap1-mediated pathways. *FEMS Yeast Res.* **2010**, *10*, 747-756. [CrossRef]

31. Wen, Z.; Wang, J.; Jiao, C.; Shao, W.; Ma, Z. Biological and molecular characterizations of field fludioxonil-resistant isolates of Fusarium graminearum. *Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.* **2022**, *184*, 105101. [CrossRef]

32. Delattin, N.; Cammue, B.P.; Thevissen, K. Reactive oxygen species-inducing antifungal agents and their activity against fungal biofilms. *Future Med. Chem.* **2014**, *6*, 77-90. [CrossRef]

**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.