# Gadolinium-doped carbon dots derived from peanut shell waste for bioimaging applications

Federica Mancini, Arianna Menichetti, Alessio Adamiano, Marco Montalti, Konstantin Paliienko, Alain Géloën, Vladimir Lysenko, Michele Iafisco

► To cite this version:

Federica Mancini, Arianna Menichetti, Alessio Adamiano, Marco Montalti, Konstantin Paliienko, et al.. Gadolinium-doped carbon dots derived from peanut shell waste for bioimaging applications. Journal of materials chemistry B, In press, 10.1039/D5TB01420D. hal-05246674

HAL Id: hal-05246674

https://hal.science/hal-05246674v1

Submitted on 9 Sep 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Journal of Materials Chemistry B

Materials for biology and medicine

Accepted Manuscript

This article can be cited before page numbers have been issued, to do this please use: F. MANCINI, A. Menichetti, A. Adamiano, M. Montalti, K. Paliienko, A. Géloën, V. Lysenko and M. Iafisco, *J. Mater. Chem. B*, 2025, DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D.

This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been accepted for publication.

Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance, before technical editing, formatting and proof reading. Using this free service, authors can make their results available to the community, in citable form, before we publish the edited article. We will replace this Accepted Manuscript with the edited and formatted Advance Article as soon as it is available.

You can find more information about Accepted Manuscripts in the **Information for Authors**.

Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the text and/or graphics, which may alter content. The journal's standard **Terms & Conditions** and the **Ethical guidelines** still apply. In no event shall the Royal Society of Chemistry be held responsible for any errors or omissions in this Accepted Manuscript or any consequences arising from the use of any information it contains.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
# Gadolinium-doped carbon dots derived from peanut shell waste for bioimaging applications

Federica Mancini<sup>a</sup>, Arianna Menichetti<sup>b</sup>, Alessio Adamiano<sup>a</sup>, Marco Montalti<sup>b</sup>, Konstantin Paliienko<sup>c,d</sup>, Alain Géloën<sup>e</sup>, Vladimir Lysenko<sup>f</sup> and Michele Iafisco<sup>a,*</sup>

View Article Online

This study explores the synthesis, characterization, and biomedical potential of carbon dots (CDs) derived from food industry by-products. Gd-doped CDs were synthesized using peanut shells as a sustainable carbon source. The resulting CDs were smaller than 20 nm in size and exhibited a negative zeta potential. FTIR analysis revealed the presence of polar surface functional groups, which contributed to excellent dispersibility in water and other polar solvents. Photophysical characterization showed strong absorption in the UV region and blue fluorescence under UV irradiation. Gd<sup>3+</sup> doping enhanced the absorption intensity in the 2–5.5 eV range and partially quenched fluorescence at high concentrations. The MRI performance of Gd-doped CDs as positive contrast agent was assessed using 7 and 11.7 Tesla scanners. Despite their lower Gd content, Gd-doped CDs exhibited signal intensities comparable to other Gd-based contrast agents. Furthermore, cytotoxicity assays confirmed their biocompatibility with A549 cells at concentrations up to 0.1 mg/mL. This approach not only provides an innovative and environmentally sustainable strategy for valorising food industry waste within a circular economy framework, but also introduces a new biocompatible material for MRI imaging applications.

Received 00th January 20xx,

Accepted 00th January 20xx

DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x

## 1. Introduction

Considering growing environmental challenges and increasing resource scarcity, the concept of circular economy has emerged as a promising alternative to the traditional linear model of production and consumption¹. Unlike the linear economy, which follows a 'take-make-dispose' approach, the circular economy aims to minimize waste and maximize resource efficiency by promoting reuse, recycling, and regeneration²,³. This model represents a paradigm shift towards sustainability, emphasising the preservation of natural resources, the reduction of environmental impact, and the creation of new economic opportunities.

One promising strategy in the pursuit of sustainable materials is the valorisation of by-products from

food industry⁴. In this context, carbon dots (CDs) synthesised from food by-products have gained significant attention. CDs are nanoscale carbon-based particles that exhibit exceptional optical, electronic, and magnetic properties, making them attractive for various biomedical and technological applications⁵⁻⁷. In recent years, CDs have been studied for bioimaging and diagnostic applications, due to their intrinsic luminescence, low toxicity, and ease of synthesis⁸⁻¹¹. These nanomaterials can be prepared from different types of food-derived waste materials through methods such as hydrothermal, microwave-assisted, or solvothermal synthesis, which facilitate the conversion of organic precursors into fluorescent nanomaterials¹²,¹³. Several different food by-products have been explored for CD preparation including orange and watermelon waste peels¹⁴,¹⁵, onion waste¹⁶ and fennel seeds¹⁷.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive and versatile imaging modality that provides detailed anatomical and functional information¹⁸. In this context, gadolinium (Gd), a lanthanide element, is widely used in MRI contrast agents and for enhancing radiosensitization due to

Journal of Materials Chemistry B Accepted Manuscript

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<footnote><sup>a</sup>Institute of Science, Technology and Sustainability for Ceramics (ISSMC), National Research Council (CNR), 48018 Faenza (RA), Italy</footnote>

<footnote><sup>b</sup>Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy</footnote>

<footnote><sup>c</sup>Corporation Science Park, Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, Kyiv 01033, Ukraine</footnote>

<footnote><sup>d</sup>Palladin Institute of Biochemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; 9, Leontovicha Str, Kyiv 01054, Ukraine</footnote>

<footnote><sup>e</sup>Claude Bernard University of Lyon, UMR Ecologie Microbienne Lyon (LEM), CNRS 5557, INRAE 1418, VetAgro Sup, 69622 Villeurbanne, France</footnote>

<footnote><sup>f</sup>Claude Bernard University of Lyon, Light Matter Institute (ILM), CNRS UMR 5306, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.</footnote>

<footnote>*Correspondence: michele.iafisco@issmc.cnr.it</footnote>
ARTICLE

its unique physical and chemical properties¹⁹⁻²¹. The Gd(3+) ion is particularly suited for MRI applications because of its long electron spin relaxation time (10⁻⁹ s) and high magnetic moment²², both of which contribute to superior contrast in MRI scans. Gd chelates, such as gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) and gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA), are commonly employed due to their high relaxivity²³. These agents work by shortening the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of nearby water protons, resulting in enhanced signal intensity in T1-weighted images and improved tissue contrast. However, free Gd ions can be highly toxic to living organisms²⁴,²⁵. As a result, Gd-doped CDs (Gd-CDs) represent a valuable and safer alternative to these compounds²⁶⁻²⁸. Gd-CDs offer improved stability, and a reduced risk of free Gd ions release compared to traditional chelates, potentially mitigating associated toxicities²⁹⁻³¹.

Several types of Gd-CDs have been developed in recent years³²⁻³⁴. Gd-CDs were typically synthesized from chemical precursors using a one-step hydrothermal or solvothermal method with citric acid as the carbon source and a Gd-compound, such as gadolinium chloride or Gd-DTPA²⁷,³⁵⁻³⁸. This approach generally ensures the efficient incorporation of Gd into carbon structures. However, it does not enable the valorization of existing biomasses and biowastes. To the best of our knowledge, very few examples of Gd-CDs produced from natural sources have been reported in the literature²²,²⁸,³⁹.

This study investigates the synthesis, characterisation and application of Gd-CDs derived from food industry by-products as potential MRI contrast agents. Specifically, we describe the synthesis of Gd-free (PSC) and Gd-doped (PSGd) CDs from peanut shells. In comparison to previous works on Gd-CDs from food industry by-products, this study explores the use of fruit peels, which, compared to other waste materials⁴⁰, account for approximately 1750 million tons of discarded fruit and vegetable by-products worldwide each year⁴¹. Thanks to the MRI contrast-enhancing capabilities of Gd, these materials demonstrated improved

imaging performance with significant potential for advancing biomedical diagnostics. Furthermore, this approach offers an innovative and environmentally sustainable strategy by converting discarded food industry by-products, such as peanut shells, into high-value nanomaterials, aligning with circular economy principles.

Journal Name

DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

## 2. Methodology

### 2.1 Materials

Peanuts were purchased from a local market, and the shells were separated manually. Ultrapure water was produced with an Arium® Pro instrument from Sartorius (Goettingen, Germany). Ammonia aqueous solution (NH₄OH, ACS reagent, 28–30% solution) was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Gadolinium chloride hexahydrate (GdCl₃·6H₂O, 99%) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Luis, MO, USA). 9,10-Diphenylanthracene (>99%) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Luis, MO, USA). Dialysis membrane with a molecular weight cut off of 3500 Da (Spectra/Por® dialysis membrane, standard RC tubing, flat width 18 mm, volume per length 1.1 ml/cm) were purchased from Repligen (Waltham, Massachusetts, USA).

Journal of Materials Chemistry B Accepted Manuscript

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
## 2.2 Synthesis of CDs

Gd-doped (PSGd) and Gd-free (PSC) CDs were prepared through a multi-step process according to the scheme reported in Figure 1. In Step 1, the peanut shells were ground at 5000 rpm for 10 minutes using a blade mill (IKA MultiDrive basic, IKA®-Werke GmbH, Staufen, Germany) equipped with blades for fibrous materials (IKA MultiDrive accessories: MultiDrive MI 250 Milling chamber and MultiDrive MI 250.2 star-shaped cutter). In Step 2, for PSGd synthesis, 150 ml of 0.1 or 0.5 M GdCl₃ solution were added to 50 g of the peanuts shell powder in a 500 ml round-bottom flask. The mixture was then refluxed at 100 °C for 1 hour to promote interaction between the source material and Gd³⁺ ions. The resulting materials were named as PSGd 0.1 M and PSGd 0.5 M. For PSC synthesis, this step was carried out identically using 150 ml of water instead of the GdCl₃ solution. In Step 3, the product was dried in air at 100 °C for 3 hours. In Step 4, the dried product was mixed with 20 ml of a 10 wt. % NH₄OH solution in a 250 ml glass flask, and the mixture was heated in a domestic microwave oven (700 W consumption power) for 20 minutes. In Step 5, the microwaved product was suspended

in 200 ml of water and sonicated for 45 minutes at full power using a tip sonicator (Bandelin electronic, GM 2070 model, 70-Watt, 20 kHz). In step 6, the ultrasonicated suspension was centrifuged at 3000 rcf for 3 hours in 50 ml tubes to remove the insoluble debris. The supernatant was then subjected to ultra-filtration using Vivaspin 20® spin concentrators (50000 MWCO, PES membrane) and centrifuged at 2000 rcf for 30 minutes. In step 7, the filtrate obtained from Step 6 was placed into dialysis membranes with a molecular weight cut-off of 3500 Da. Dialyzing membrane containing PSGd and PSC suspensions were placed separately into 10 L water tanks, with water being refreshed every 12 hours for 72 hours in the case of PSC or 120 hours for PSGd 0.1 and 0.5 M. In Step 8, PSC and PSGd samples were preconcentrated by centrifugation of the dialyzed dispersions using 3000 MWCO Vivaspin 20® PES membranes at 3000 rcf for 2 hours. For each sample, filtrate and retentate were collected for further analysis.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Schematic illustration of the preparation process of Gd-doped and Gd-free CDs.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>
## 2.3 CDs characterization

Proton magnetic resonance relaxation time T1 of the CDs in water suspensions was measured by Bruker Minispec MQ60 nuclear magnetic resonance analyser (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), operating at 40 °C under 1.4 T (60 MHz) magnetic field. Aliquots of 300 µl were taken from concentrated samples and measured in NMR glass tubes. Gd content of the suspensions was determined by ICP-MS analysis using a Perkin Elmer NexION2000 (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with Elemental Scientific Inc. SC-FAST Sample Introduction system. Measurements were done in a standard mode with argon plasma. Calibration curve was done using the PlasmaCAL® Gadolinium standard for ICP-AES and MS analysis. The samples were prepared by dilution in an aqueous solution of 1 % v/v HNO₃ with 5 ppb of Indium as an internal standard. The experimental data were expressed as the mean value ± standard deviation (SD) of several abundant Gd isotopes (¹⁵⁶Gd, ¹⁵⁸Gd, ¹⁶⁰Gd) of n (n = 3) independent experiments. CDs aqueous dispersions were analyzed through dynamic light scattering (DLS) to determine the hydrodynamic diameter distribution and electrophoretic mobility (ζ-potential). DLS and ζ-potential analyses were performed after dilution using a Zetasizer Nano ZSP Instrument (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK). The hydrodynamic diameter distribution of the samples was measured using the carbon dot refractive index (1.55) and water refractive index (1.33) as working parameters for the samples and the solvent, respectively. Size results are reported as the Z-average of the hydrodynamic diameter of the particles of three measurements at 25 °C of at least 10 runs. ζ-potentials were quantified as the electrophoretic mobility at 25 °C of three separate measurements (maximum 100 runs each) using laser Doppler velocimetry using a disposable electrophoretic cell (DTS1061, Malvern Ltd., Worcestershire, UK) with the same sample and solvent parameters.

The concentration of CDs was estimated by freeze drying the samples and weighting the solid residue. Dry mass content was found to be 7.8, 6.4 and 2.1 mg/mL for PSC, PSGd 0.1 M and PSGd 0.5 M, respectively. Freeze-dried CDs were further

characterized using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The PXRD pattern was collected with a D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). Cu Kα X-rays were generated at 40 kV and 40 mA. The pattern was collected in the 10–60° 2θ range with a step size of 0.02° 2θ and a counting time of 0.5 s. FT-IR spectra were collected in attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode with a Nicolet iS5 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific INC., Waltham, MA, USA) using an iD7 diamond ATR accessory. The spectra were collected with a resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ by accumulation of 32 scans covering the 4000 to 400 cm⁻¹ spectral range.

Photo-physical characterization of CDs was performed on as-synthesized suspensions after dilution. CDs absorption spectra were recorded using a Perkin Elmer Lambda 650 UV/Vis spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA). In addition, spectral deconvolution was performed, after subtraction of an exponential-like baseline, in the full wavenumber range using ORIGIN 2018 software. The obtained UV-Vis spectra were deconvolved on elementary Gaussian-like peaks. Emission spectra and 3D excitation and emission maps were recorded using a Horiba Fluoromax-4 spectrofluorometer (Horiba, Edison, NJ, USA). Emission lifetimes were obtained through time-correlated single photon counting (Edinburgh Instruments, Levington, UK). Emission lifetimes were obtained through time-correlated single photon counting (Edinburgh Instruments, Levington, UK). Fluorescence quantum yields were calculated using 9,10-diphenylanthracene as the standard, by means of the following equation⁴²:

$$ \Phi = \Phi_s \frac{I A_s n^2}{I_s A n_s^2} \quad (1) $$

where Φ is the quantum yield, Φs is the quantum yield of the standard, I is the integrated area of the emission spectrum of the sample and Is is that of the standard, A is the absorbance at the excitation wavelength of the sample and As is that of the standard, and n is the refractive index of the solvent of the sample and ns is that of the standard.

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>
## 2.4 Cytotoxicity

Cell number measurements were performed using a non-destructive impedance-based technique called xCELLigence (ACEA Biosciences Inc., Biotek, Colmar, France). Cells were cultured on a special plate with electrodes at the bottom. The system measures the electrical impedance across interdigitated microelectrodes located at the bottom of the culture wells. Measurements were made by applying an alternative excitation signal (with a control voltage amplitude of 20 mV) at 3 different frequencies (10, 25 and 50 kHz) through the microelectrodes in the E-plates while monitoring the voltage drop across the electrodes. The impedance data were processed over time, resulting in a cell index value. The cell index was related to factors such as cell number, cell surface area and adhesion strength. Of these factors, cell number was found to be the primary determinant of the cell index value for a given cell line, although changes on adhesion strength can also affect cell index. The impedance measurement method used was non-destructive and allowed continuous real-time monitoring of cell proliferation under different conditions, including the presence of CDs and after their removal (washout), on the same cell population. To assess the effects of cell toxicity, the time-dependent evolution of the cell index was recorded in response to increasing CDs concentrations. Each curve represents the average cell index measured in six wells. Experiments were carried out using human alveolar basal epithelial A549 adenocarcinoma cells, as a key aim of this study was to explore the potential of CDs for in vivo tumor imaging and therapy. Cells were seeded at 2500 cells/well and allowed to grow for several days until a cell index value close to 1 was reached, then the culture medium was replaced with the same composition including CDs. Cells were maintained for 24 h in the presence of CDs, then the culture medium was replaced with fresh culture medium without CDs (washout).

## 2.5 MRI measurements

MRI was conducted using a mouse phantom (Bioemtech, Athens, Greece) composed of a soft-tissue-mimicking material insensitive to magnetic fields. Scanning was performed at 11.7 T using MR scanner Bruker BioSpec 117/16 USR magnet (500 MHz) associated with a sheath of gradients BGA09S HD (750mT/m), coil RF RES 500 1H 089/072 QUAD TO AD (BMRIDET11232V3/0047) and software version Paravision PV360.3.4MR. To get the best contrast of T₁-weighted image we applied a regime with a short constant echo time (TE) = 6.5 ms, and variable repetition time (TR) with middle range sequence (364, 376, 390, 405, 423, 443, 468, 499, 541, and 606 ms). Field Of View (FOV) = 60x30 mm (128x64 pixels), slice thickness = 0.6 mm, factor of rapid imaging with refocused echo (RARE) was 4. To get T₂-weighted image we used a regime of constant long TR (2500 ms) and constant short TE (64 ms). FOV = 60x30 mm (256x128 pixels), slice thickness = 0.6 mm, RARE factor = 4. Moreover, we performed MRI using another magnetic scanner with field of 7 T using Bruker BioSpec 70/20 magnet (300 MHz) associated with a sheath of gradients BGA12S2 (670mT/m), coil RF RES 300 1H 112/072 QUAD TR M (BMRIDET9562V3/0031) and software version Paravision PV7.0. T₁-weighted image was obtained in a regime with short constant echo time (TE) = 5.75 ms, and variable repetition time (TR) with middle range sequence (28.6, 183.6, 382.9, 662.7, 1135.8, and 3500 ms). FOV = 60x30 mm (128x64 pixels), slice thickness = 1.6 mm, RARE factor = 1. T₂-weighted image was formed in regime of constant long TR (2500 ms) and constant short TE (29.18 ms). FOV = 60x30 mm (256x128 pixels), slice thickness = 0.6 mm, RARE factor = 8. These measurements were done on the PILoT facility (PILoT, INSA LYON, Bât. Léonard de Vinci, 21 Av. Jean Capelle 69621 Villeurbanne).

View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>
## 3. Results and discussion

### 3.1 Relaxometry

To use these nanomaterials as MRI contrast agents, it is crucial to evaluate the potential presence of free Gd³⁺ ions in the final dispersion and the strength of their complexation with the carbon core ²². Free Gd³⁺ ions are known to be toxic, but their toxicity can be significantly reduced by chelating them with a suitable organic ligand or by entrapping them into a carbon skeleton⁴³. The Gd³⁺ content in a sample, as well as the sample's purity and the effectiveness of Gd incorporation into the CDs, can be assessed through relaxometry by measuring the longitudinal proton relaxation time (T1). To this end, aliquots of both filtrates and retentates from PSC and PSGds samples were collected as described in Step 8 of the production process (Figure 1), and their T1 values were measured (Figure 2) to evaluate the success of the synthesis, particularly the effectiveness of the dialysis and the overall purification process. Throughout this study, PSC was used as the control, while ddH₂O served as the reference for the filtrate samples. The T1 values of pure water remained constant at 4000 ± 20 ms, confirming the accuracy of the measurements. Following preconcentration of PSC, the relaxation time of the filtrate passing through the 3000 Da membrane was measured at 3970 ± 10 ms, closely matching that of water. However, a slight decrease in T1 was observed in the filtrates of PSGd 0.1 and 0.5 M after preconcentration, with recorded values of 3210 ± 10 ms and 3160 ± 10 ms, respectively, compared to the reference value of 4000 ± 20 ms. This decrease may be attributed to the intrinsic paramagnetic properties of these samples, likely due to the

presence of unpaired electrons in organic free radicals. Paliienko et al.²² observed a similar behaviour, which they attributed to relatively stable paramagnetic organic radicals at room temperature. These include high-spin polymer radicals⁴⁴ and dimerized small organic radicals⁴⁵. The preconcentration products, i.e. PSGd 0.1 and 0.5 M retentates, exhibited significant reduced T1 values of 21.71 ± 0.05 ms and 33.7 ± 0.05 ms, respectively. These findings suggest the presence of a large number of Gd-CDs with molecular weights greater than 3500 Da, which are unable to pass through the 3000 Da membrane. This also supports the conclusion that most of the Gd is incorporated into CDs with molecular weights above 3500 Da, rather than existing as free Gd³⁺ ions, which would otherwise permeate the membrane.

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** T1 relaxation time of the retentates (R) and filtrates (F) of PSC, PSGd 0.1 M and PSGd 0.5 M.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.2 Physico-chemical characterisation

The Gd content of CDs was determined using ICP-MS to quantify the exact concentration of Gd in PSGd 0.1 and 0.5 M samples (Table 1). The measured values, consistent with the relaxometry results, confirm successful synthesis and a relatively

high Gd mass content in the PSGd 0.1 and 0.5 M retentates. In contrast, no Gd was detected in the PSC sample. Additionally, a Gd concentration of approximately 0.05 µg/ml was found in the filtrates of both Gd-doped samples, indicating effective purification process and the absence of free Gd³⁺ ions.

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Physico-chemical properties of CDs: Gd content, size, Pdl and ζ-potential.</caption><thead><tr><th>Sample</th><th>µg of Gd per<br>1 mg of CDs</th><th>% w/w of Gd/CDs</th><th>Size (nm)†</th><th>Pdl</th><th>ζ-potential (mV)</th><th>pH</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PSC</td><td>*0.0206</td><td>*0.00207</td><td>17 ± 4</td><td>0.259</td><td>-26 ± 7</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>PSGd 0.1 M</td><td>2.64</td><td>0.264</td><td>6 ± 1</td><td>0.252</td><td>-13 ± 3</td><td>6.2</td></tr><tr><td>PSGd 0.5 M</td><td>6.20</td><td>1.91</td><td>5 ± 2</td><td>0.255</td><td>-9 ± 1</td><td>6.2</td></tr></tbody></table>

View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

* Data indicates absence of Gd. † Size distribution by number.

The size and surface charge of the nanoparticles were analyzed at their native pH after dilution to 0.150 mg/mL in water, with the results summarized in Table 1. All samples exhibited small particle sizes (<20 nm). The PSC sample had a larger average size of about 17 nm, whereas the PSGd samples were smaller, with diameters around 5-6 nm. The smaller size of the PSGd samples may be influenced by the limited particle growth due to the coordination of a higher amount of Gd³⁺ on the CD¹ surface⁴⁶. Additionally, all samples displayed a negative ζ-potential, which became progressively less negative with increasing Gd³⁺ concentration. Notably, the PSGd 0.5 M sample demonstrated lower stability than the other two, consistent with material sedimentation observed after approximately one month of storage.

The FTIR spectra of PSC and PSGds are reported in Figure 3A. In all spectra, the presence of the carboxyl group was confirmed by the characteristic band between 3500 and 3000 cm⁻¹ due to the stretching vibration of O–H and the intense band at 1035 cm⁻¹ due to the stretching vibration of C–O⁴⁷. The band at 2926 cm⁻¹ can be attributed to the stretching vibration of sp³-hybridized alkane bonds. The band at 1580 cm⁻¹ could be related either to C=N stretches in conjugated systems or to C=O bond stretching, indicating the presence of carbonyl groups on the surface of CDs. Furthermore, the band at 1384 cm⁻¹ may arise from various phenomena, such as the deformation vibrations of C–H and O–H bonds in organic species, the stretching of carboxylate groups, the C-N stretching³⁸ or some vibrations of aromatic

fragments²². The band at 1241 cm⁻¹ could correspond to the C-O stretching of an epoxy/ether group, as reported also in our previously published paper⁴⁸, or to the C-N vibration in amides III. While this band is clearly visible in the spectra of PSC and PSGd 0.1 M, it only appears as a shoulder in the case of PSGd 0.5 M. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the spectrum of PSGd 0.5 M shows more pronounced peaks between 1580 and 1384 cm⁻¹ compared to PSC and PSGd 0.1 M, suggesting that Gd ions may be chelated by carboxyl/carboxylate groups⁴⁹.

To further investigate the surface chemistry of the produced CDs and the coordination of Gd³⁺ ions, FTIR deconvolution was performed in the region between 1200 and 1750 cm⁻¹, where both protonated and deprotonated carboxyl groups are typically observed. Specifically, protonated groups are usually found in the region between 1650 and 1850 cm⁻¹, while the deprotonated asymmetric groups are found around 1385 cm⁻¹⁴⁶,⁵⁰. The deconvoluted spectra are shown in Figure S1 of the Supplementary section. In general, a gradual decrease in the contribution of the protonated carboxyl group (Figure S1 B) at around 1725 cm⁻¹ and an increase in the contribution of the deprotonated carboxyl group (Figure S1 A) at around 1370 cm⁻¹ were observed with increasing Gd concentration. This trend has recently been observed in the literature⁴⁶ and may be related to the coordination of the carboxyl groups with Gd, a phenomenon that becomes more pronounced as the Gd concentration increases.

Overall, the FTIR spectra indicate that the surface of CDs is rich in polar functional groups, such as hydroxyl, amide, and carboxyl/carboxylate

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>
moieties. These groups enhance the dispersibility of the CDs in water and other polar solvents, facilitating simpler manipulation of the samples³⁸,⁵¹. These observations are consistent with the negative ζ-potential values reported in Table 1, further confirming the presence of polar functionalities introduced during the oxidation process.

The PXRD patterns of CDs are shown in Figure 3B. All the samples display a single broad band at 30° 2θ, which is characteristic of an amorphous carbon phase¹⁵,⁵². No significant differences are observed among the three samples. These results align with the previous findings, as it is well established in the literature that CDs derived from both natural and synthetic carbon sources typically exhibit an amorphous structure⁵²⁻⁵⁵.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) (Figure S2) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (Figure S3) equipped with Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) (Figure S4) were employed to gain information on the morphology and the elemental composition of CDs in terms of C, O, N and Gd content, respectively. The nanoparticles appear spherical and, in some instances, tend to form aggregates. Excluding these agglomerates, the particle sizes are consistent with the DLS results,

averaging around 20 nm. The TEM image shown in Figure S2 is representative of PSC sample; however, no significative differences were observed when compared to the Gd-containing samples. It is worth noting that CDs are intrinsically difficult to image by TEM because of their small size, low atomic contrast, and high sensitivity to electron beam damage. While high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) could potentially improve image clarity, in the present case it would not provide additional morphological information beyond that already obtained through the combined TEM, PXRD, and DLS analyses.

SEM analysis revealed that PSC sample (Figure S3 A) and the Gd-doped samples (Figures S3 B, C) exhibit an amorphous, disordered structure without a definite geometry or shape. EDX analysis confirmed the presence of C and O as the main constituent elements, along with Gd, in both doped samples. As expected, Gd was not detected in the PSC sample, consistent with the ICP-MS analysis. Additionally, the Gd content was higher in PSGd 0.5 M compared to PSGd 0.1 M, in agreement with the ICP-MS results. The C content was approximately 55-65 atomic % and the O content around 30-35 atomic % across all samples.

DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

A

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

B

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** FTIR spectra (A) and PXRD patterns (B) of PSC, PSGd 0.1 M and PSGd 0.5 M.</figcaption></figure>
### 3.3 Photo-physical characterisation

UV-Vis spectroscopy and photoluminescence were used to further characterize the samples and evaluate the optical properties of CDs. All three samples appeared brownish under daylight and exhibited blue fluorescence under UV irradiation (Figure S5).

As reported in our previous work⁴⁸, CDs typically exhibit one or more strong ultraviolet absorption bands between 220–270 nm and 280–350 nm. However, the exact position of these peaks can vary considerably within the UV and the visible wavelength regions, depending on both the production process and the carbon source used⁵,⁵⁶. The absorption spectra shown in Figure 4A indicate no significant differences in shape among the three samples. All spectra display a strong absorption maximum in the UV region at approximately 200 nm, along with a broad adsorption band extending into the visible range⁵⁷,⁵⁸. The shoulder observed between 250 and 300 nm is attributed to the π-π* transition of C=C bonds⁵⁵,⁵⁶,⁵⁸, while the broad tail in the visible range is primarily associated with transitions involving surface states, which are

typically influenced by the surface functional groups⁵⁹.

DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

To better understand the effect of Gd³⁺ incorporation into CDs, the UV-Vis spectra shown in Figure 4A were deconvolved to elementary Gaussian-like peaks (Figure 4B, C and D). After subtracting the exponential-like baselines, complex multi-component spectra were obtained, revealing clearly distinguishable deconvoluted features. Overall, the incorporation of Gd³⁺ ions leads to an increased intensity of the main absorption bands in the 2-5.5 eV range. Notably, a significant relative increase in the intensity of the peak at 4 eV - compared to those centered at 3.5 and 4.5 eV - was observed, particularly in the case of PSGd 0.5 M (Figure 4D). According to literature, the high energy bands (6-4.5 eV) correspond to π→π* transitions associated with aromatic sp2 carbons (e.g., aromatic C=C bonds). In contrast, the bands between 4 and 3 eV are typically attributed to the intrinsic n→π* transitions of C=O or C=N bonds within the carbon cores. The absorption feature at 2.5 eV is instead mainly influenced by surface functionalities⁶⁰.

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Absorption spectra (A) and deconvoluted absorption spectra of PSC (B), PSGd 0.1 M (C) and PSGd 0.5 M (D).</figcaption></figure>

Excitation-emission maps for the three samples are shown in Figure 5. All samples exhibit a main photoluminescence band with excitation wavelength in the 330-430 nm range and emission between 350-550 nm. The emission maximum occurs at approximately 450 nm, when the CDs are excited at around 350 nm. Compared to PSC, the PSGd 0.1 M sample shows subtle differences, including a minor band with excitation at 300 nm and emission around 320-330 nm, as well as a very weak band with excitation at 300 nm and emission near 700 nm. In contrast, the PSGd 0.5 M sample displays significantly reduced emission intensity. As a result, the excitation-emission map also reveals the Raman scattering signal from water⁶¹. This diminished fluorescence is likely due to the lower colloidal stability and dispersibility of PSGd 0.5M in water, as discussed in section 3.2. Additionally, the

high Gd content in this sample may contribute to fluorescence quenching, a phenomenon reported for various metal cations⁶²⁻⁶⁴.

Quantum yields (QYs) were measured at 350 nm to compare the emission properties of the three samples. The PSC and the PSGd 0.1 M samples exhibit QYs of approximately 1%, while PSGd 0.5 M shows a significantly lower emission with a QY of 0.2%, consistent with the water Raman scattering signal visible in its excitation-emission map. It is worth noting that CDs derived from biowastes typically display lower QYs than those synthesized from high-purity chemicals. This difference is mainly attribute to the higher purity of precursors in the latter, which result in fewer structural defects and reduced non-radiative recombination sites⁶⁵⁻⁶⁷. To improve QY, one possible strategy involves the addition of citric acid to the biomass precursor.

Journal of Materials Chemistry B Accepted Manuscript

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /></figure>
Citric acid is a low-molecular-weight compound rich in carboxyl groups, which can promote the formation of well-defined carbon cores during carbonisation. These structures are believed to

enhance the development of emissive centres,
thereby increasing QY⁶⁸.

DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

Fluorescence lifetime measurements yielded values between 2.7 and 3.3 ns for all samples, confirming their intrinsic fluorescent nature.

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Excitation-emission maps of PSC (A), PSGd 0.1 (B) and PSGd 0.5 M (C).</figcaption></figure>

3.4 *In vitro* cell toxicity

Given its superior physico-chemical and photophysical properties - particularly in terms of stability and emission intensity - PSGd 0.1 M was selected for biocompatibility assessment as a potential contrast agent, and its performance was compared to the control sample, PSC.

Figure 6 shows the average normalized cell index curves, calculated from six replicates, or various CD concentrations. The cell index reflects cell viability and proliferation. As illustrates in Figure 6A, PSC led to a concentration-dependent increase in cell index

during incubation. Since values returned close to near-control values after the washout step, the observed increase suggests an enhancement in cell adhesion rather than cell proliferation. Importantly, cells continued to proliferate after the washout, indicating that PSC is non-toxic across all tested concentrations. Conversely, Figure 6B reveals a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect of PSGd 0.1 M. At 0.1 mg/mL, the sample shows negligible impact on cell viability, with values similar to the control. At 0.25 mg/mL a slight reduction in the cell index is observed, while higher concentrations (0.5 and 1.0 mg/mL) exhibit clear cytostatic effects.

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_20.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_21.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Cell culture (A549) toxicity evaluation of PSC (A) and PSGd 0.1 M (B).</figcaption></figure>

### 3.5 MRI assessment

PSGd 0.1 M was evaluated as a T1-weighted MRI contrast agent using a mouse phantom model containing 9 wells (Figure 7). Wells #1 and #2 were left unused, while wells #8 and #9 contained samples unrelated to this study (marked with a red rectangle). Well #3 contained a 3 mM GdCl₃ solution, chosen to match the T1 relaxation time of PSGd 0.1 M. Well #4 contained AGuIX® (1.0 mg/ml in water), which are Gd-based polymeric nanoparticles currently in clinical trials⁶⁹. Well #5 was filled with deionized water as the control. Well #6 and #7 contained PSC (6.4 mg/ml in water) and PSGd 0.1 M (6.4 mg/ml in water), respectively.

MRI scans were performed using 11.7 Tesla (Figure 7B, C), and 7 Tesla (Figure 7D, E) scanners. Comparative Gd concentrations for each sample are provided in Table S1, with AGuIX® values sourced from the literature⁷⁰,⁷¹. Figure 7 shows four MRI scans with varying signal intensities and

contrast. As expected, the images produced with the 11.7 Tesla scans are significantly brighter than those obtained with the 7 Tesla scans, though the overall trends are consistent across both field strength. This difference is mainly attributable to the higher signal-to-noise ratio and increased sensitivity to T1 contrast at higher magnetic fields, which is particularly relevant for low-Gd-content formulations such as PSGd 0.1 M.

T₁-weighted images revealed high intensity (bright) regions in wells #3, #4 and #7, corresponding to GdCl₃, AGuIX® and PSGd 0.1 M, respectively. This confirms that PSGd 0.1 M effectively acts as a positive contrast agent, which shortens T₁ relaxation times, causing the areas where it is localized to appear bright in T₁-weighted images⁷². Notably, despite its lower Gd content (Table S1), PSGd 0.1 M produced signal intensity comparable to GdCl₃ and AGuIX®. Such performance at lower Gd

View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

Journal of Materials Chemistry B Accepted Manuscript

<figure><img src="image_22.png" /></figure>
content is particularly advantageous from a safety perspective, as it may reduce risks associated with Gd retention without compromising image quality. The strong contrast-enhancing capabilities of PSGd 0.1 M is further emphasised by its significantly lower Gd concentration (1.08x10⁻⁴ mol/L) compared to clinically approved Gd-based contrast agents, such as gadoteridol, gadoterate meglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine, which are typically formulated at a Gd concentration of 0.5 mol/L for intravenous injection in humans⁷³⁻⁷⁵. Moreover, its T1 longitudinal relaxation time of 21.71 ± 0.05 ms at 1.4 T (60 MHz, 40 °C) is comparable to that reported for other Gd-doped CDs synthesised from coffee wastes (7.96 ms)²², and substantially lower than the T1 values for traditional positive contrast agents like Gd-DTPA (Magnevist ®) (250-350 ms)⁷⁶. These data further support its valuable imaging performance.

The 7 Tesla scanner generated weaker signals, due to the reduced current generated by the transverse magnetization around the receiver coil at 7 Tesla

compared to the 11.7 Tesla scanner⁷⁷. As a result, in Figure 7D, we observe less intense signals according to the Gd concentration in the samples (Table S1), with only a barely discernible area for GdCl₃, and practically indistinguishable signals for AGulX® and PSGd 0.1 M. As positive contrast agents reduce signal intensity on T2-weighted images, negative contrast agents (e.g. dysprosium, ferromagnetic composites, etc.) are typically used⁷². The T2-weighted images in Figure 7C and E illustrate this phenomenon: the lower the Gd content, the brighter the observed area.

DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

In conclusion, PSGd 0.1 M demonstrated promising MRI capabilities, especially at 11.7 Tesla. Its comparable performance to existing Gd-based contrast agents, despite its lower Gd content, highlights its potential for further development. Future studies will explore its performance at varying concentrations and validate its safety and efficacy.

<figure><img src="image_23.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Mouse phantom under room light (A), and T1-weighted (B), T2-weighted (C) images acquired using an 11.7 Tesla MRI scanner, along with T1-weighted (D), T2-weighted (E) images obtained with a 7 Tesla scanner. Wells were filled as follows: #1 and #2 – empty; #3 – GdCl₃ (3 mM), #4 – AGulX® (1.0 mg/ml), #5 – H₂O, #6 – PSC (6.4 mg/ml), #7 – PSGd 0.1 M (6.4 mg/ml), #8 and #9 – samples unrelated to this study (marked with a red rectangle).</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_24.png" /></figure>
## 3.6 Literature comparison of doped and undoped CDs

View Article Online

DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

As recently reviewed by Lv et al.³², the properties of Gd-doped CDs — including size, absorption wavelength, quantum yield, and relaxation time — can vary extensively depending on the reagents and synthesis method employed. Direct comparison between biowaste-derived CDs and those produced from conventional synthetic precursors is challenging due to the different structural, optical, and surface properties arising from heterogeneous biowaste versus well-defined synthetic molecules. To provide a broader context, Table 2 summarizes key parameters (particle size, quantum yield, and relaxation properties) extracted from approximately ten representative studies, comparing our doped and undoped CDs with a wide range of reported systems used for bioimaging purposes, including fluorescence imaging (FI), MRI and X-ray computed tomography (CT). The size of reported CDs generally ranges from 2 to 20 nm, including those of this study, whereas only samples from references ⁴⁹ and ⁸⁰ reached up to 200 nm likely due to aggregation. Undoped CDs typically exhibit long T1 relaxation times, precluding their

use as MRI contrast agents despite often high photoluminescence quantum yields, particularly when derived from synthetic precursors. In contrast, doped CDs, including PSGd 0.1 M, display T1 values in the low millisecond range (7–22 ms) and high r1 relaxivities (up to approximately 15 mM⁻¹·s⁻¹) confirming their suitability as MRI contrast agents.

Analysis of Table 2 shows that biowaste-derived doped CDs achieve MRI performance comparable to conventional synthetic CDs. The r1 relaxivity of PSGd 0.1 M is comparable to or higher than many Gd-doped CDs from chemical precursors. Although undoped CDs often show higher photoluminescence quantum yields, their long T1 values preclude MRI applications, highlighting the essential role of metal doping. Trends in size, quantum yield, and relaxation properties across different precursors further demonstrate that co-doping with metals such as Gd, Yb, or Mn is key to enabling multi-modal imaging capabilities, including fluorescence, MRI, and CT.

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Comparison of doped and undoped CDs reported in the literature, highlighting key physicochemical and imaging properties.</caption><thead><tr><th>Precursor/Source</th><th>Doping</th><th>Size (nm)</th><th>QY (%)</th><th>T1 (ms) and r1 (mM<sup>-1</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>Reported application</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Peanut shells (this work)</td><td>Gd-doped</td><td>5-7</td><td>1.0</td><td>21.7 ms [1.4 T]</td><td>MRI</td><td>This work</td></tr><tr><td>Coffee waste</td><td>Gd-doped</td><td>2-7</td><td>n.d.</td><td>7.96 ms [1.4 T]</td><td>MRI</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>Citric acid, GdCl<sub>3</sub></td><td>Gd-doped</td><td>50-100</td><td>4.06</td><td>22.31 ms [0.5 T]/ 14.08 mM<sup>-1</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup></td><td>FI/MRI</td><td>49</td></tr><tr><td>Sucrose, GdCl<sub>3</sub></td><td>Gd-doped</td><td>~ 5</td><td>5.4</td><td>11.36 mM<sup>-1</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup></td><td>MRI/optical nanoprobes</td><td>78</td></tr><tr><td>Na<sub>2</sub>EDTA, GdCl<sub>3</sub>, YbCl<sub>3</sub>, L-arginine</td><td>Gd- and Yb-doped</td><td>5-6</td><td>16.84</td><td>6.65 mM<sup>-1</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup></td><td>FI/MRI/CT</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>DPH*, MnCl<sub>2</sub></td><td>Mn-doped</td><td>40-200</td><td>28.30</td><td>0.932 mM<sup>-1</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup></td><td>FI/MRI</td><td>80</td></tr><tr><td>Mn(CH<sub>3</sub>COO)<sub>2</sub>, o-phenylenediamine</td><td>Mn-doped</td><td>~ 5</td><td>9.57</td><td>12.69 mM<sup>-1</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup></td><td>FI/MRI</td><td>81</td></tr><tr><td>Peanut shells (this work)</td><td>Undoped</td><td>13-21</td><td>1.0</td><td>2214 ms [1.4 T]</td><td>Control sample in MRI</td><td>This work</td></tr><tr><td>Coffee waste</td><td>Undoped</td><td>4-11</td><td>n.d.</td><td>2030 ms [1.4 T]</td><td>Control sample in MRI</td><td>22</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_25.png" /></figure>
<table><tr><td>Citric acid, ethylene diamine</td><td>Undoped</td><td>~ 4</td><td>53</td><td>n.d.</td><td>FI</td><td>82<br/>View Article Online<br/>DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D</td></tr><tr><td>Lemon juice, ethanol</td><td>Undoped</td><td>~ 5</td><td>28</td><td>n.d.</td><td>FI</td><td>83</td></tr></table>

*DPH: 5,5'-Diphenylhydantoin.

## 4. Conclusion

Fluorescent Gd-doped CDs were successfully synthesised from peanut shells using a microwave-assisted method, representing a sustainable approach in line with the principles of circular economy. The preparation is simple and potentially scalable, although the dialysis purification step could be replaced with more efficient and reproducible systems, such as tangential flow filtration (TFF) or other membrane-based purification techniques, to facilitate industrial applications. Gd incorporation was confirmed by a significant decrease in longitudinal proton relaxation time (T1) compared to controls, indicating effective integration into the CD structure. The resulting CDs exhibited surface-rich polar functional groups —such as hydroxyl, amide, and carboxyl/carboxylate moieties— facilitating high dispersibility in water and polar solvents and thus enabling easier manipulation. Importantly, Gd-doped CDs showed no cytotoxicity towards human A549 adenocarcinoma cells up to 0.1 mg/mL and demonstrated substantial contrast enhancement, especially under an 11.7 Tesla MRI scanner in a mouse phantom model.

While conventional synthesis from chemical precursors allows for precise tuning of optical and physicochemical properties, biowaste-based methods emphasize sustainability and biocompatibility, often sacrificing fine control over material parameters. These intrinsic differences highlight the unique value and potential of biowaste-derived CDs, while also indicating that more studies and comprehensive reports are needed to fully evaluate and benchmark their performance. Looking ahead, these CDs could be functionalized with targeting ligands such as hyaluronic acid or folic acid, which bind to CD44 and folate receptors, respectively —both commonly

overexpressed in a variety of cancers—opening the way for cell-specific imaging and therapeutic applications<sup>84,85</sup>.

## Author contributions

Conceptualization: M.I., V.L.; Data curation: F.M., A. M., K.P.; Formal analysis: F.M., A.M.; Funding acquisition: M.I., V.L.; Investigation: F.M., A.M., K.P., A.G.; Methodology: F.M., K.P., V.L., A.A.; Supervision: M.I., M.M., V.L.; Writing – original draft: F.M.; Writing – review and editing: all the authors.

## Declaration of Competing Interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

## Funding

This work was supported by the EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Staff Exchange Programme (RISE) under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action (H2020-MSCA-RISE-2020, project 101008159 "UNAT").

## Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the Supplementary Information.
References

(1) Geisendorf, S.; Pietrulla, F. The Circular Economy and Circular Economic Concepts—a Literature Analysis and Redefinition. *Thunderbird International Business Review* **2018**, *60* (5), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21924.

(2) Circular economy: definition, importance and benefits | Topics | European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20151201STO05603/circular-economy-definition-importance-and-benefits (accessed 2024-03-19).

(3) Environment Agency, G. 9 PRINCIPLES FOR A CIRCULAR ECONOMY.

(4) Lugo, S. D. R.; Kimita, K.; Nishino, N. Circular Food Economy Framework: Challenges and Initiatives. *Procedia CIRP* **2022**, *112*, 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.09.019.

(5) Kang, C.; Huang, Y.; Yang, H.; Yan, X. F.; Chen, Z. P. A Review of Carbon Dots Produced from Biomass Wastes. *Nanomaterials* **2020**, *10* (11), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112316.

(6) Salimi Shahraki, H.; Ahmad, A.; Bushra, R. Green Carbon Dots with Multifaceted Applications–Waste to Wealth Strategy. *FlatChem* **2022**, *31*, 100310. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FLATC.2021.100310.

(7) Zhu, P.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Yan, X.; Luo, D. Carbon Dots in Biomedicine: A Review. **2022**. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c01215.

(8) Kaur, P.; Verma, G. Converting Fruit Waste into Carbon Dots for Bioimaging Applications. *Materials Today Sustainability* **2022**, *18*, 100137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100137.

(9) Song, Y.; Zhu, S.; Yang, B. Bioimaging Based on Fluorescent Carbon Dots. *RSC Adv* **2014**, *4* (52), 27184. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra47994c.

(10) Li, L.; Lu, C.; Li, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Cai, W.; Xu, W.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, R. A High-Yield and Versatile Method for the Synthesis of Carbon Dots for Bioimaging Applications. *J Mater Chem B* **2017**, *5* (10), 1935–1942. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TB03003C.

(11) Li, H.; Yan, X.; Kong, D.; Jin, R.; Sun, C.; Du, D.; Lin, Y.; Lu, G. Recent Advances in Carbon Dots for Bioimaging Applications. *Nanoscale Horiz* **2020**, *5* (2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NH00476A.

(12) Newman Monday, Y.; Abdullah, J.; Yusof, N. A.; Abdul Rashid, S.; Shueb, R. H. Facile Hydrothermal and Solvothermal Synthesis and Characterization of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots from Palm Kernel Shell Precursor. *Applied Sciences* **2021**, *11* (4), 1630. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041630.

DOI: 10.3390/app11041630

(13) Ng, H. K. M.; Lim, G. K.; Leo, C. P. Comparison between Hydrothermal and Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Carbon Dots from Biowaste and Chemical for Heavy Metal Detection: A Review. *Microchemical Journal* **2021**, *165*, 106116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2021.106116.

(14) Zhou, J.; Sheng, Z.; Han, H.; Zou, M.; Li, C. Facile Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Dots Using Watermelon Peel as a Carbon Source. *Mater Lett* **2012**, *66* (1), 222–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.08.081.

(15) Prasannan, A.; Imae, T. One-Pot Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Dots from Orange Waste Peels. *Ind Eng Chem Res* **2013**, *52* (44), 15673–15678. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie402421s.

(16) Bandi, R.; Gangapuram, B. R.; Dadigala, R.; Eslavath, R.; Singh, S. S.; Guttena, V. Facile and Green Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Dots from Onion Waste and Their Potential Applications as Sensor and Multicolour Imaging Agents. *RSC Adv* **2016**, *6* (34), 28633–28639. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra01669c.

(17) Dager, A.; Uchida, T.; Maekawa, T.; Tachibana, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Mono-Disperse Carbon Quantum Dots from Fennel Seeds: Photoluminescence Analysis Using Machine Learning. *Sci Rep* **2019**, *9* (1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50397-5.

(18) Caspani, S.; Magalh, R.; Sousa, T. Magnetic Nanomaterials as Contrast Agents for MRI. **2020**, No. lii.

(19) Sherry, A. D.; Woods, M. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CONTRAST AGENTS: HISTORICAL. **2009**, 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.0609 06.151929.Chemical.

(20) Hao, D.; Ai, T.; Goerner, F.; Hu, X.; Runge, V. M.; Tweedle, M. Review: MR Physics for Clinicians MRI Contrast Agents: Basic Chemistry and Safety. **2012**, *1071*, 1060–1071. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23725.

(21) Bellin, M. MR Contrast Agents, the Old and the New. **2006**, *60*, 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.06.021.
(22) Paliienko, K.; Topchylo, A.; Alekseev, S.; Géloën, A.; Milovanov, Y.; Lysenko, T.; Skryshevsky, V.; Borisova, T.; Lysenko, V. Green Synthesis of Biocompatible Gd3+-Doped Ultrasmall Carbon-Based Nanohybrids from Coffee Wastes. *Carbon Resources Conversion* **2023**, 7 (September 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2023.09.001.

(23) Mao, X.; Xu, J.; Cui, H. Functional Nanoparticles for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. *Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol* **2016**, *8* (6), 814–841. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1400.

(24) Kajjumba, G. W.; Attene-Ramos, M.; Marti, E. J. Toxicity of Lanthanide Coagulants Assessed Using Four in Vitro Bioassays. *Science of the Total Environment* **2021**, *800*, 149556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149556.

(25) Lee, J.; Ger, T.; Hsiao, C. Their Atomic Number. **2022**.

(26) Li, J.; Bianco, A. Gadolinium-Incorporated Carbon Nanodots for T 1 - Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging. **2021**. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c02993.

(27) Jiao, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhou, X.; Xu, J.; Xing, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, M.; Xu, K.; Zheng, S. Gadolinium Doped Red-Emissive Carbon Dots as Targeted Theranostic Agents for Fluorescence and MR Imaging Guided Cancer Phototherapy. *Chemical Engineering Journal* **2022**, *440* (March), 135965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.135965.

(28) Molaei, M. J. Gadolinium-Doped Fluorescent Carbon Quantum Dots as MRI Contrast Agents and Fluorescent Probes. *Sci Rep* **2022**, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22518-0.

(29) Eriksson, P.; Truong, A. H. T.; Brommesson, C.; du Rietz, A.; Kokil, G. R.; Boyd, R. D.; Hu, Z.; Dang, T. T.; Persson, P. O. A.; Uvdal, K. Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles with Entrapped Gadolinium for High T₁ Relaxivity and ROS-Scavenging Purposes. *ACS Omega* **2022**, *7* (24), 21337–21345. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03055.

(30) Hou, W.; Xia, F.; Alfranca, G.; Yan, H.; Zhi, X.; Liu, Y.; Peng, C.; Zhang, C.; de la Fuente, J. M.; Cui, D. Nanoparticles for Multi-Modality Cancer Diagnosis: Simple Protocol for Self-Assembly of Gold Nanoclusters Mediated by Gadolinium Ions. *Biomaterials* **2017**, *120*, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.12.027.

(31) Cao, M.; Wang, P.; Kou, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Chen, C. Gadolinium(III)-Chelated Silica Nanospheres Integrating Chemotherapy and Photothermal Therapy for Cancer Treatment and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. *ACS Appl Mater Interfaces* **2015**, *7* (45), 25014–25023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b06938.

(32) Lv, X.; Chen, L.; Guo, R.; Yang, Y.; Liu, X.; Yu, S. Gadolinium Functionalized Carbon Dot Complexes for Dual-Modal Imaging: Structure, Performance, and Applications. *ACS Biomater Sci Eng* **2025**. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c02278.

(33) Du, J.; Zhou, S.; Ma, Y.; Wei, Y.; Li, Q.; Huang, H.; Chen, L.; Yang, Y.; Yu, S. Folic Acid Functionalized Gadolinium-Doped Carbon Dots as Fluorescence / Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent for Targeted Imaging of Liver Cancer. *Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces* **2024**, *234*, 113721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113721.

(34) Ansari, L.; Hallaj, S.; Hallaj, T.; Amjadi, M. Doped-Carbon Dots: Recent Advances in Their Biosensing, Bioimaging and Therapy Applications. *Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces* **2021**, *203*, 111743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111743.

(35) Wang, L.; Zhou, W.; Yang, D.; Zhe, H.; Mei, S.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, W.; Li, H.; Fan, H.; Xie, F.; Guo, R. Gadolinium-Doped Carbon Dots with High-Performance in Dual-Modal Molecular Imaging. *Analytical Methods* **2021**, *13* (21), 2442–2449. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1AY00270H.

(36) Yu, C.; Xuan, T.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, X.; Lian, G.; Li, H. Gadolinium-Doped Carbon Dots with High Quantum Yield as an Effective Fluorescence and Magnetic Resonance Bimodal Imaging Probe. *J Alloys Compd* **2016**, *688*, 611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.226.

(37) Li, D.; Jing, P.; Sun, L.; An, Y.; Shan, X.; Lu, X.; Zhou, D.; Han, D.; Shen, D.; Zhai, Y.; Qu, S.; Zbořil, R.; Rogach, A. L. Near-Infrared Excitation/Emission and Multiphoton-Induced Fluorescence of Carbon Dots. *Advanced Materials* **2018**, *30* (13). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201705913.

(38) Mauro, N.; Cillari, R.; Gagliardo, C.; Utzeri, M. A.; Marrale, M. Gadolinium-Doped Carbon Nanodots as Potential Anticancer Tools for Multimodal Image-Guided Photothermal

<figure><img src="image_26.png" /></figure>
Therapy and Tumor Monitoring. **2023**, 0–11.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c03583.

(39) Yao, Y.-Y.; Gedda, G.; Girma, W. M.; Yen, C.-L.; Ling, Y.-C.; Chang, J.-Y. Magnetofluorescent Carbon Dots Derived from Crab Shell for Targeted Dual-Modality Bioimaging and Drug Delivery. *ACS Appl Mater Interfaces* **2017**, *9* (16), 13887–13899.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b01599.

(40) Echeverria, M. C.; Nuti, M. Valorisation of the Residues of Coffee Agro-Industry: Perspectives and Limitations. *The Open Waste Management Journal* **2017**, *10* (1), 13–22.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1876400201710010013.

(41) Kumar Gupta, R.; AE Ali, E.; Abd El Gawad, F.; Mecheal Daood, V.; Sabry, H.; Karunanithi, S.; Prakash Srivastav, P. Valorization of Fruits and Vegetables Waste Byproducts for Development of Sustainable Food Packaging Applications. *Waste Management Bulletin* **2024**, *2* (4), 21–40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2024.08.005.

(42) Ma, X.; Tian, H. Photochemistry and Photophysics. Concepts, Research, Applications. By Vincenzo Balzani, Paola Ceroni and Alberto Juris. *Angewandte Chemie International Edition* **2014**, *53* (34), 8817–8817.
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201405219.

(43) Ersoy, H.; Rybicki, F. J. Biochemical Safety Profiles of Gadolinium-Based Extracellular Contrast Agents and Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis. **2007**, *1197*, 1190–1197.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21135.

(44) Weckhuysen, B. M.; Ramachandra Rao, R.; Pelgrims, J.; Schoonheydt, R. A.; Bodart, P.; Debras, G.; Collart, O.; Van Der Voort, P.; Vansant, E. F. Synthesis, Spectroscopy and Catalysis of [Cr(Acac)3] Complexes Grafted onto MCM-41 Materials: Formation of Polyethylene Nanofibres within Mesoporous Crystalline Aluminosilicates. *Chemistry - A European Journal* **2000**, *6* (16), 2960–2970.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3765(20000818)6:16<2960::AID-CHEM2960>3.0.CO;2-7.

(45) Fujita, W.; Awaga, K. Room-Temperature Magnetic Bistability in Organic Radical Crystals. *Science* (1979) **1999**, *286* (5438), 261–262.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5438.261.

(46) Mitiushev, N.; Musaeva, D. U.; Artemov, D. A.; Syuy, A. V.; Pavlova, O. S.; Pirogov, Y. A.;

Kabachkov, E.; Fionov, A.; Kytin, V. G.; Konstantinova, E.; Timoshenko, V. Y.; Baranov, A. N. Gadolinium-Doped Carbon Nanoparticles: Coordination, Spectroscopic Characterization and Magnetic Resonance Relaxivity. *Dalton Transactions* **2025**.
https://doi.org/10.1039/D5DT00362H.

(47) Kurdekar, A.; Chunduri, L. A. A.; Bulagonda, E. P.; Haleyurgirisetty, M. K.; Kamisetti, V.; Hewlett, I. K. Comparative Performance Evaluation of Carbon Dot-Based Paper Immunoassay on Whatman Filter Paper and Nitrocellulose Paper in the Detection of HIV Infection. *Microfluid Nanofluidics* **2016**, *20* (7).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-016-1763-9.

(48) Mancini, F.; Menichetti, A.; Esposti, L. D.; Montesi, M.; Panseri, S.; Bassi, G.; Montalti, M.; Lazzarini, L.; Adamiano, A.; Iafisco, M. Fluorescent Carbon Dots from Food Industry By-Products for Cell Imaging. **2023**.

(49) Liao, H.; Wang, Z.; Chen, S.; Wu, H.; Ma, X.; Tan, M. One-Pot Synthesis of Gadolinium-Doped Carbon Dots for Fluorescence/Magnetic Resonance Bimodal Imaging. *RSC Adv* **2015**, *5* (82), 66575–66581.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA09948J.

(50) Saito, K.; Xu, T.; Ishikita, H. Correlation between C=O Stretching Vibrational Frequency and PKa Shift of Carboxylic Acids. *J Phys Chem B* **2022**, *126* (27), 4999–5006.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c02193.

(51) Chem, J. M. Carbon Dots: Surface Engineering and Applications. **2016**, 5772–5788.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c6tb00976j.

(52) Xue, M.; Zhan, Z.; Zou, M.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, S. Green Synthesis of Stable and Biocompatible Fluorescent Carbon Dots from Peanut Shells for Multicolor Living Cell Imaging. *New Journal of Chemistry* **2016**, *40* (2), 1698–1703.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nj02181b.

(53) Chen, G.; Wu, S.; Hui, L.; Zhao, Y.; Ye, J.; Tan, Z.; Zeng, W.; Tao, Z.; Yang, L.; Zhu, Y. Assembling Carbon Quantum Dots to a Layered Carbon for High-Density Supercapacitor Electrodes. *Sci Rep* **2016**, *6*, 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19028.

(54) Dong, Y.; Wan, L.; Cai, J.; Fang, Q.; Chi, Y.; Chen, G. Natural Carbon-Based Dots from Humic Substances. *Sci Rep* **2015**, *5*, 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10037.

<figure><img src="image_27.png" /></figure>
(55) Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Kong, H.; Wang, Y.; Qin, G.; Cao, P.; Song, X.; Yan, X.; Wang, Q.; Qu, H. Novel Carbon Quantum Dots from Egg Yolk Oil and Their Haemostatic Effects. *Sci Rep* **2017**, *7* (1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04073-1.

(56) Khan, W. U.; Wang, D.; Zhang, W.; Tang, Z.; Ma, X.; Ding, X.; Du, S.; Wang, Y. High Quantum Yield Green-Emitting Carbon Dots for Fe(III) Detection, Biocompatible Fluorescent Ink and Cellular Imaging. *Sci Rep* **2017**, *7* (1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15054-9.

(57) Baker, S. N.; Baker, G. A. Luminescent Carbon Nanodots: Emergent Nanolights. *Angewandte Chemie - International Edition* **2010**, *49* (38), 6726–6744. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200906623.

(58) Suzuki, K.; Malfatti, L.; Takahashi, M.; Carboni, D.; Messina, F.; Tokudome, Y.; Takemoto, M.; Innocenzi, P. Design of Carbon Dots Photoluminescence through Organo-Functional Silane Grafting for Solid-State Emitting Devices. *Sci Rep* **2017**, *7* (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05540-5.

(59) Ding, H.; Yu, S. B.; Wei, J. S.; Xiong, H. M. Full-Color Light-Emitting Carbon Dots with a Surface-State-Controlled Luminescence Mechanism. *ACS Nano* **2016**, *10* (1), 484–491. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b05406.

(60) Amzel, L. M.; Covey, D. F.; Fenselau, C.; Nickon, A.; Robinson, C. H. Organic Structural Analysis. *Biol Mass Spectrom* **1977**, *4* (6), vii–ix. https://doi.org/10.1002/bms.1200040612.

(61) Kalita, A.; Deka, K.; Kalita, M. P. C. On the Influence of Raman Scattering of Water in the Photoluminescence Measurement of Water Dispersed ZnO Nanocrystals. *Methods Appl Fluoresc* **2017**, *5* (2), 027001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2050-6120/aa6ab8.

(62) Wang, B.; Cai, H.; Waterhouse, G. I. N.; Qu, X.; Yang, B.; Lu, S. Carbon Dots in Bioimaging, Biosensing and Therapeutics: A Comprehensive Review. **2022**. https://doi.org/10.1002/smsc.202200012.

(63) Ehrat, F.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Schneider, J.; Lo, A.; Wyrwich, R.; Rogach, A. L.; Stolarczyk, J. K.; Urban, A. S.; Feldmann, J. Tracking the Source of Carbon Dot Photoluminescence: Aromatic Domains versus Molecular Fluorophores. **2017**. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03863.

(64) Han, Y.; Shi, L.; Luo, X.; Chen, X.; Yang, W.; Tang, W.; Wang, J.; Yue, T.; Li, Z. A Signal-on-Off Uorescent Sensor for Ultra-Trace Detection of Hg 2+ via Ag + Mediated Sulfhydryl Functionalized Carbon Dots. *Carbon N Y* **2019**, *149*, 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.052.

(65) Ramanan, V.; Thiyagarajan, S. K.; Raji, K.; Suresh, R.; Sekar, R.; Ramamurthy, P. Outright Green Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Dots from Eutrophic Algal Blooms for In Vitro Imaging. *ACS Sustain Chem Eng* **2016**, *4* (9), 4724–4731. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00935.

(66) Ding, H.; Wei, J.; Zhang, P.; Zhou, Z.; Gao, Q.; Xiong, H. Solvent-Controlled Synthesis of Highly Luminescent Carbon Dots with a Wide Color Gamut and Narrowed Emission Peak Widths. *Small* **2018**, *14* (22). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201800612.

(67) Cheng, C.; Xing, M.; Wu, Q. A Universal Facile Synthesis of Nitrogen and Sulfur Co-Doped Carbon Dots from Cellulose-Based Biowaste for Fluorescent Detection of Fe3+ Ions and Intracellular Bioimaging. *Materials Science and Engineering: C* **2019**, *99*, 611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.003.

(68) Li, X.; Liu, X.; Su, Y.; Jiang, T.; Li, D.; Ma, X. Green Synthesis of Carbon Quantum Dots from Wasted Enzymatic Hydrolysis Lignin Catalyzed by Organic Acids for UV Shielding and Antioxidant Fluorescent Flexible Film. *Ind Crops Prod* **2022**, *115568*, 115568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115568.

(69) Thivat, E.; Casile, M.; Moreau, J.; Molnar, I.; Dufort, S.; Seddik, K.; Le Duc, G.; De Beaumont, O.; Loeffler, M.; Durando, X.; Biau, J. Phase I/II Study Testing the Combination of AGuIX Nanoparticles with Radiochemotherapy and Concomitant Temozolomide in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (NANO-GBM Trial Protocol). *BMC Cancer* **2023**, *23* (1), 344. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10829-y.
Mowat, P.; Mignot, A.; Rima, W.; Lux, F.; Tillement, O.; Roulin, C.; Dutreix, M.; Bechet, D.; Huger, S.; Humbert, L.; Barberi-Heyob, M.; Aloy, M. T.; Armandy, E.; Rodriguez-Lafrasse, C.; Le Duc, G.; Roux, S.; Perriat, P. Radiosensitizing Effects of Ultrasmall Gadolinium Based Particles on Tumour Cells. *J Nanosci Nanotechnol* **2011**, *11* (9), 7833–7839. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.4725.

<figure><img src="image_28.png" /></figure>
ARTICLE

Journal Name

(71) Borisova, T.; Pozdnyakova, N.; Krisanova, N.; Pastukhov, A.; Dudarenko, M.; Paliienko, K.; Grytsaenko, V.; Lux, F.; Lysenko, V.; Rocchi, P.; Komisarenko, S.; Tillement, O. Unique Features of Brain Metastases-Targeted AGulX Nanoparticles vs Their Constituents: A Focus on Glutamate-/GABA-Ergic Neurotransmission in Cortex Nerve Terminals. *Food and Chemical Toxicology* **2021**, *149*, 112004.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112004.

(72) Xiao, Y.-D.; Paudel, R.; Liu, J.; Ma, C.; Zhang, Z.-S.; Zhou, S.-K. MRI Contrast Agents: Classification and Application. *Int J Mol Med* **2016**, *38* (5), 1319–1326.
https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2744.

(73) Aime, S.; Caravan, P. Biodistribution of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents, Including Gadolinium Deposition. *Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging* **2009**, *30* (6), 1259–1267.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21969.

(74) Iacobellis, F.; Di Serafino, M.; Russo, C.; Ronza, R.; Caruso, M.; Dell'Aversano Orabona, G.; Camillo, C.; Sabatino, V.; Grimaldi, D.; Rinaldo, C.; Barbuto, L.; Verde, F.; Giacobbe, G.; Schillirò, M. L.; Scarano, E.; Romano, L. Safe and Informed Use of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent in Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Where We Were and Where We Are. *J Clin Med* **2024**, *13*(8), 2193.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082193.

(75) Fujita, S.; Nakazawa, M.; Hagiwara, A.; Ueda, R.; Horita, M.; Maekawa, T.; Irie, R.; Andica, C.; Kunishima Kumamaru, K.; Hori, M.; Aoki, S. Estimation of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Concentration Using Quantitative Synthetic MRI and Its Application to Brain Metastases: A Feasibility Study. *Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences* **2019**, *18*(4), 260–264.
https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0119.

(76) Doeblin, P.; Schilling, R.; Wagner, M.; Luhur, R.; Huppertz, A.; Hamm, B.; Taupitz, M.; Durmus, T. Intraindividual Comparison of T1 Relaxation Times after Gadobutrol and Gd-DTPA Administration for Cardiac Late Enhancement Imaging. *Eur J Radiol* **2014**, *83* (4), 660–664.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.12.019.

(77) Bitar, R.; Leung, G.; Perng, R.; Tadros, S.; Moody, A. R.; Sarrazin, J.; McGregor, C.; Christakis, M.; Symons, S.; Nelson, A.; Roberts, T. P. MR Pulse Sequences: What Every Radiologist Wants to Know but Is Afraid to Ask. *RadioGraphics* **2006**, 26 (2), 513–537.
https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.262055063.

(78) Gong, N.; Wang, H.; Li, S.; Deng, Y.; Chen, X.; Ye, L.; Gu, W. Microwave-Assisted Polyol Synthesis of Gadolinium-Doped Green Luminescent Carbon Dots as a Bimodal Nanoprobe. *Langmuir* **2014**, *30* (36), 10933–10939.
https://doi.org/10.1021/la502705g.

(79) Zhao, Y.; Hao, X.; Lu, W.; Wang, R.; Shan, X.; Chen, Q.; Sun, G.; Liu, J. Facile Preparation of Double Rare Earth-Doped Carbon Dots for MRI/CT/FI Multimodal Imaging. *ACS Appl Nano Mater* **2018**, *1*(6), 2544–2551.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnanm.8b00137.

(80) Stan, C. S.; Coroaba, A.; Simionescu, N.; Uritu, C. M.; Bejan, D.; Ursu, L. E.; Dascalu, A.-I.; Doroftei, F.; Dobromir, M.; Albu, C.; Ania, C. O. Mn-Doped Carbon Dots as Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance and Fluorescence Imaging. *Int J Mol Sci* **2025**, *26*(13), 6293.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136293.

(81) Sun, S.; Zhao, L.; Wu, D.; Zhang, H.; Lian, H.; Zhao, X.; Wu, A.; Zeng, L. Manganese-Doped Carbon Dots with Redshifted Orange Emission for Enhanced Fluorescence and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. *ACS Appl Bio Mater* **2021**, *4* (2), 1969–1975.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01597.

(82) Ding, H.; Wei, J.-S.; Zhong, N.; Gao, Q.-Y.; Xiong, H.-M. Highly Efficient Red-Emitting Carbon Dots with Gram-Scale Yield for Bioimaging. *Langmuir* **2017**, *33*(44), 12635–12642.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02385.

(83) Ding, H.; Ji, Y.; Wei, J.-S.; Gao, Q.-Y.; Zhou, Z.-Y.; Xiong, H.-M. Facile Synthesis of Red-Emitting Carbon Dots from Pulp-Free Lemon Juice for Bioimaging. *J Mater Chem B* **2017**, *5* (26), 5272–5277.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TB01130J.

(84) Essa, M. L.; Elashkar, A. A.; Hanafy, N. A. N.; Saied, E. M.; El-Kemary, M. Dual Targeting Nanoparticles Based on Hyaluronic and Folic Acids as a Promising Delivery System of the Encapsulated 4-Methylumbelliferone (4-MU) against Invasiveness of Lung Cancer in Vivo and in Vitro. *Int J Biol Macromol* **2022**, *206*, 467–480.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.095.

(85) Askar, M. A.; Thabet, N. M.; El-Sayyad, G. S.; El-Batal, A. I.; Abd Elkodous, M.; El Shawi, O. E.; Helal, H.; Abdel-Rafei, M. K. Dual Hyaluronic Acid and Folic Acid Targeting PH-Sensitive Multifunctional 2DG@DCA@MgO-Nano-Core–Shell-Radiosensitizer for Breast Cancer Therapy.

<figure><img src="image_29.png" /></figure>

Journal of Materials Chemistry B Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name

Cancers (Basel) **2021**, *13* (21), 5571.

https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13215571.

ARTICLE

View Article Online

DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

<figure><img src="image_30.png" /></figure>
The datasets supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. All relevant experimental data, including characterization files, imaging results, and supplementary figures, are provided within the article and its Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI).

DOI: 10.1039/D5TB01420D

<figure><img src="image_31.png" /></figure>