# Protection over restoration to ensure water sustainability

Filomena Silva, Ramia Al Bakain, Gilles Pradeau, Mathieu Ben Braham,

Jelena Prtorić, Nassim Ait-Mouheb, Elena Gomez, Patrick Allard

► To cite this version:

Filomena Silva, Ramia Al Bakain, Gilles Pradeau, Mathieu Ben Braham, Jelena Prtorić, et al. Protection over restoration to ensure water sustainability. Communications Earth & Environment, 2024, 5 (1), pp.638. 10.1038/s43247-024-01798-6. hal-04759377

HAL Id: hal-04759377

https://hal.science/hal-04759377v1

Submitted on 30 Oct 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Protection over restoration to ensure water sustainability

Filomena Silva, Ramia Al Bakain, Gilles Pradeau, Mathieu Ben Braham, Jelena Prtorić, Nassim Ait-Mouheb, Elena Gomez & Patrick Allard

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

Plastics pollution, persistent chemical contamination and inadequately treated wastewater are three key aspects that hinder access to safe and affordable water for all. We argue that a strong priority on pollution avoidance, research for remediation, and tighter regulation and monitoring must be implemented to make progress.

The ambitious goal of achieving universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water by 2030 was outlined by the United Nations (UN) in 2015¹. This goal is now unlikely to be met². In particular, in contrast to pathogen contamination, chemical water pollution remains a significant but under-scrutinized issue³. Water bodies bear the brunt of the 2 billion tons of synthetic chemicals produced annually globally⁴ and of the 540,000+ chemical substances registered with limited environmental fate data⁵. As such, a substantial fraction of water bodies are severely polluted⁶ and water is the environmental medium with the highest number of detectable chemical contaminants⁷ (Fig. 1).

Access to safe water is remarkably inequitable. Two thirds of the world's population experience severe water scarcity every year⁸. For these people, water low on environmental contaminants is an unattainable luxury. Water contamination and water scarcity are emphasized in the UN Sustainable Development Goals, but these two aspects are rarely linked – although clearly, contaminated water cannot be used to fulfill most of human's water-related needs. Global water inequality is causing substantial water-related forced displacement, not only in the Middle East and North Africa, but increasingly also in the rest of the world⁸,⁹.

These threats to our water systems are neither novel nor unrecognized. Nevertheless, at the 2023 UN Water Conference, which was aimed at assessing the progress made mid-way through the International Decade for Action (“Water for Sustainable Development”, 2018-2028), practical solutions were scarce and centered on the vague recommendation of fostering “innovative, affordable local solutions”¹⁰.

To highlight science/policy gaps in water sustainability, we considered and compared three distinct and pressing water issues: pollution by micro- and nano-plastics; contamination by per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), sometimes termed ‘forever chemicals’; and the use of wastewater in agriculture. Based on discussions at a conference on water management, contamination and toxicity¹¹, we identify five priorities to make progress with the United Nations’ water-related goals: (1) heavily favor pollution prevention strategies, i.e. stopping contamination at the source; to be paired with (2) research into degradation and removal of contaminants already present in the environment; (3) mapping of water contaminants and research into their health effects; (4) transparent communication of

presence and health effects of contaminants to stakeholders and the public; and lastly (5) tightening regulations and closing loopholes.

## Recycling plastics is part of the problem

It is now clear that micro- and nanoplastics are an integral part of our lives as they are detectable in a wide array of human tissues including blood, lung, placenta, and testis¹²⁻¹⁵. Exposure to micro- and nanoplastics is associated with negative health outcomes in laboratory models and humans including neurotoxicity, inflammation, cancer and cardiovascular events¹¹,¹⁶,¹⁷. However, there is still a large gap in our understanding of their generation at all stages of their life cycle and of their environmental fate¹⁸,¹⁹. Nevertheless, there is a heavy focus of international agreements on the circularity of the plastics economy that ignores the predicted dramatic 44-fold increase in micro- and nanoplastics generation as a result of increased mechanical recycling or downcycling of plastics²⁰.

Equally concerning is the widespread and persisting confusion regarding the recyclability, biodegradability, and compostability of plastics and bioplastics, and their environmental impacts. For example, products labelled as bioplastics may still contain fossil-fuel generated plastic material (e.g. plastics made of fossil-based but biodegradable polymers) while the vast majority of compostable plastics are only compostable following processes solely found in industrial composting facilities that are still not widely available²¹⁻²³. This confusion combined with a lack of adequate methodologies to assess plastic biodegradability in water and marine environments²⁴,²⁵ all cast strong doubts on the promises of plastic biodegradability in water²⁶. Indeed, the environmental degradation and composting of “biodegradable” plastics as well as the mechanical recycling of plastics lead to the generation of large amounts of micro- and nanoplastics²⁰⁻²⁴,²⁶. We therefore propose that secondary micro- and nanoplastics, that is those that originate from plastic degradation, need to be taken into account when assessing the effective footprint of plastic products and when trying to address plastic contamination. Elimination and reduction of plastic use is the only truly sustainable intervention (Fig. 2) and should be heavily prioritized over recycling, composting, or other environmental biodegradation strategies.

Since only 9% of plastics ever produced have been recycled, or, more accurately, downcycled, i.e. turned into products of lesser quality²⁷,²⁸, most plastics manufactured are still present in our environment. Thus, a second, parallel focus should be on the development and implementation at scale of bioengineering strategies for the degradation of existing plastics but inclusive of micro- and nanoplastics in water effluents²⁹. Again, an emphasis on micro- and nanoplastics in environmental plastic degradation strategies will be necessary to avoid their generation during in situ plastic degradation the processes³⁰.

Significant roadblocks in the implementation of this vision will likely originate from the need for harmonization on the definition and assessment of microplastics³¹, a strong and continuing involvement of oil
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 1 | Water unsustainability.</figcaption></figure>

and plastic-industry lobbyists in drafting international agreements³²⁻³⁴, the purposeful design of exemptions to elimination efforts³⁵, and the lack of transparency of the petrochemical industry³⁶.

**Comprehensive regulations for PFAS**

Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) represent a large family of over 15,000 synthetic chemicals³⁷ that are omnipresent in the environment³⁸ and that have sometimes been termed ‘forever chemicals’ because of their remarkable environmental persistence³⁹. PFAS are used in many materials for their high performance physico-chemical properties, and are found, for example, in water-resistant clothing, air conditioning, food packaging, cookware, medical devices, and many more⁴⁰. In 2020, in the EU alone, 75,000 tons of PFAS were emitted, and without regulation, it is estimated that 4.4 million more tons may be emitted in the next 30 years⁴¹. Because of their production volume and persistence, PFAS are an important water contaminant widely found in US and European drinking water systems, as well as in rain water⁴² and in over 75% of US water streams⁴³⁻⁴⁶.

Exposure to legacy PFAS, i.e. PFAS phased out of production in the early 2000's due to safety concerns, causes a plethora of health effects including the deregulation of lipid metabolism, lower birth weight, and cancer⁴⁷. Unfortunately, the new generation of PFAS chemicals claimed to be safer than the legacy PFAS are also showing clear toxicological effects⁴⁷.

Current legislation in Europe and in the US allows widespread PFAS contamination in water to persist. For example, since 2000, EU's water quality and quantity are regulated through the Water Framework Directive and its daughter directives, such as the Groundwater Directive and the Environmental Quality Standards Directive⁴⁸, with the aim to ensure that all the fresh- and groundwater bodies achieve good ecological, chemical, and quantitative status by 2027. In parallel, REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals)⁴⁹ regulation "aims to protect human health and the environment against the harmful effects of chemical substances", among which are PFAS. Despite these ambitious legislations, numerous water bodies - both surface and groundwater - still fail to achieve 'good status' due to widespread chemical pollution⁵⁰,⁵¹. Because there is still a great need to measure the extent of PFAS environmental contamination, the unique Forever Pollution collaborative project between journalists and scientists has comprehensively mapped PFAS contamination in water, soil or living organisms⁵². Their work has identified ~23,000 PFAS contaminated sites, many in water bodies, and over 2300 hotspots across Europe⁵².

To address the widespread and persistent environmental contamination by PFAS, US⁵³,⁵⁴ and European⁵⁵ legislations to restrict these chemicals have been proposed. Some of these legislation drafts appear significantly more advanced than those addressing micro- and nanoplastics, since they are based on a broad definition of PFAS, which would regulate, in theory, the
# Reducing single-use plastics in hotels: a pilot study

## Examples of implemented changes

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

## Outcomes

* Waste production was reduced by 78% (in mass)

* Costs were down by 42% (for consumables)

* Staff engagement and time-saving

* No changes in costumer satisfaction

* One year later, most alternatives are still in place and made at the group level (Europe)

* The project is being adapted and replicated in other countries around the Mediterranean sea

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 2** | A pilot hotel case study towards reduction of single-use plastics in hotels. Plastic elimination can be implemented without delay, as successfully demonstrated by the efforts of the non-governmental organization BeyondPlasticMed. To curtail the more than 3000 billion particles of microplastic found in the Mediterranean Sea, the most polluted sea in the world, BeyondPlasticMed developed a toolkit method for removing single-use plastics from hotels that was successfully implemented at the InterContinental Marseille - Hotel Dieu, France. The methodology was comprised of six steps: (1) Assess the current state of plastic use at the hotel location

(2) Prioritize the single-use plastics (SUPs) that will be tackled (3) Develop strategies to remove, reduce, or replace these SUPs (4) Select the best sustainable alternative to SUPs (5) Trial run new alternatives in hotel environment (6) Gauge trial run impact. As a result of this initiative, waste production was reduced by 78% and costs for consumers went down by 42% with no change in consumer satisfaction. The hotel staff was engaged, and one year later most measures were still in place. The project is now being expanded to locations around the Mediterranean sea including in Tunisia, Greece, and Spain.

entire family of PFAS molecules. However, many of the shortcomings of current legislation, such as patchy monitoring data, an insufficient application of the polluter-pays principle, and pre-designed loopholes based on use are likely to apply to the proposed draft legislations as well.

The need for improved implementation and enforcement of environmental laws was highlighted in the 2021 EU Action Plan: 'Towards Zero Pollution for Air, Water and Soil⁵⁶'. The aforementioned purposely designed loopholes are of particular concern. For example, despite the estimated cost of €238 billion/year to remove PFAS from European drinking and wastewater, emission permits are allowed, and compensation deals can be struck in ways not proportionate to the emission's environmental impact⁵⁷. In California, while outlining a restriction of PFAS from many consumer products, the current Governor vetoed their proposed restriction from cleaning products⁵⁸. Meanwhile, in Europe proposed derogations, some up to 12 years, are proposed for PFAS used as fluoropolymers and in clothing⁵⁹. With more than 70 years of large-scale PFAS production and with over 15,000 PFAS in use, the establishment of drinking water limits of only 6 PFAS by the US Environmental Protection Agency falls short of its description as a major victory⁶⁰.

PFAS regulation must be accelerated and broadened to all uses, with low or no thresholds and with a strong enforcement of polluter-pay

principles⁶¹ that will directly be used towards improved monitoring and remediation efforts.

## When water is most needed: the challenges of wastewater use for agriculture

With over 80% of its population enduring extremely high water stress, the Middle East and North Africa region is the most water stressed region in the world⁶². This precarious state is only expected to worsen as it is intensified by climate change, limited water resources, inflation in the population size from local and immigration flow, as well as by the conversion of natural environments by human action⁶³. Water scarcity causes significant economic losses and environmental degradation, which affects agricultural production: over 50% of water withdrawal is used for agriculture⁶³,⁶⁴.

In this context, reuse of treated wastewater is viewed as a priority solution for agricultural sustainability⁶⁵. However, by 2020, less than 11% of municipal wastewater was directly reused in the Middle East and North Africa region⁶⁶,⁶⁷. Barriers to more widespread implementation of treated wastewater reuse include low trust level; lack of funding, infrastructure and expertise; fragmented governance; and unclear, ineffectively implemented regulations without enforcement⁶⁵,⁶⁸.
**Box 1 | A case study in the Algerian Sahara**

In the Berriane region in the north of Ghardaïa (center of Algerian Sahara), an agricultural perimeter called Oued El Bir (300 ha in total) was officially created in 2013, downstream of a wastewater treatment plant. However, inadequate project management and poor coordination between the institutional actors involved in the resource reuse process have severely limited the direct use of treated wastewater for agriculture. As part of the Massire project financed by IFAD (2018–2024), the objective of the study was to analyze the infiltration of insufficiently treated sewage from the treatment plant into the groundwater which is then recaptured and

therefore indirectly reused by farmers accessing it through their own boreholes. The main results indicated that while there is contamination of 4 out of 9 analyzed boreholes with pathogens (total coliforms, fecal coliforms, streptococcus and *E. coli*), there is no evidence of widespread mixing of wastewater and groundwater. Current efforts are focusing on the monitoring of microcontaminants to better understand the impact of indirect water reuse on water quality and better delineate the possible agricultural practices and crops for which the unregulated use of this water might be safe.

One common thread connecting these limitations is the issue of chemical contamination in treated wastewater. Despite regulations across the Middle East and North Africa, farmers must use what is available, which can be untreated or inadequately treated wastewater from a mix of municipal and industrial sources⁶⁶ and therefore contaminated with a wide variety of chemicals such as pharmaceuticals, pesticides, metals, endocrine disrupting chemicals, etc.⁶⁹,⁷⁰. Thus, intentional use of untreated wastewater occurs in many peri-urban areas while unintentional use by farmers happens via the contamination of groundwater downstream of released untreated or insufficiently treated wastewater⁶⁹. Importantly, the removal of micro-contaminants and contaminants of emerging concerns such as endocrine disruptors and PFAS cannot be achieved through the treatment levels currently deployed⁶⁹,⁷¹. The recent case study of water reuse in the Algerian Sahara (Box 1)⁷² highlights the need to (1) develop capacity in not only building but also operating and maintaining wastewater treatment plants to sustain agriculture, (2) deploy comprehensive environmental monitoring efforts inclusive of chemical pollutants, and (3) clear communication and coordination of the treated water uses (direct or indirect, Box 1) with the farming communities⁷⁰. Challenges to the implementation of participatory water governance are a lack of trust in the government, changes in government and their policies, shallow consultation process, and counter-productive involvement of the private sector⁷³,⁷⁴.

**Towards effective global pollution strategies**

Our focus on these three salient water-related contamination problems – plastics, persistent chemicals, and wastewater use – reveals important common bottlenecks to achieving clean water goals. We suggest the following paths forward.

1. **Protection over restoration.** Contaminant removal strategies are often insufficient or inadequate, such as with micro- and nanoplastics in drinking water¹⁹. Chemical replacement often leads to regrettable substitution as seen with PFAS⁴⁷ but also many other contaminants⁷⁵. Policies aiming to control the use of contaminated water are often ignored, especially in water-stressed areas⁷². We argue that strategies for the elimination, or at least the significant reduction of contamination, should be heavily prioritized in all water sustainability endeavors over other approaches, such as recycling, environmental capture, policy changes, etc.

2. **Comprehensive data collection.** The recent finding that bottled water contains several hundreds of thousands of micro- and nanoplastics⁷⁶ highlighted how little we know about their presence in our environment as well as the need for more accurate and sensitive detection

methods⁷⁶. Across the three water issues discussed here emerges a clear need to better map water contaminants across water bodies and sources⁵²,⁷²,⁷⁷,⁷⁸, and to gain a deeper understanding of the health effects of exposure to water contaminants, including substitutes to chemicals that are being phased out⁷⁹,⁸⁰.

3. **Improved communication.** Communication to consumers and policy makers is sorely needed around the life cycle of water pollutants, to address misunderstandings about their environmental fate. The lack of transparency surrounding the presence of water contaminants combines with the equal lack of clarity about the impact of human practices on water contamination. The confusion surrounding plastic biodegradability, recyclability, and compostability – which often leads to a worsening of plastic pollution²¹⁻²³ – is one example, but there is also a lack of awareness and trust in the safety of treated reused water⁷²,⁸¹⁻⁸³. Dissemination of knowledge on these issues will empower stakeholders to enact changes at all levels from practice to policy-level. Such efforts are especially important at the level of the general public to allow people to make smarter and more sustainable decisions and to maximize consumer pressure.

4. **Research towards environmental removal and degradation.** Humans have transformed their environment and created a world in which, for the foreseeable future, they will live alongside the chemicals and particles they produced. While elimination/reduction efforts need to be prioritized to prevent increased contamination, scientifically-sound removal and biodegradation methods must be developed and scaled to address the current, long-lasting, water contamination problem⁸⁴⁻⁸⁶.

5. **Broadening and tightening of regulatory loopholes.** Draft versions of policies to regulate primary micro- and nanoplastics and PFAS in the US and in Europe already contain exceptions that are perhaps better termed loopholes⁷⁷,⁵⁹. Regulations need to be broadened to also include secondary micro- and nanoplastics (i.e. not intentionally produced as such but instead generated from degradation or recycling) as well as a closing of existing loopholes. Policies should include strong polluter-pay counter-incentives commensurate to the scale of the damage to our ecosystems and health. Finally, it is important that these policies find support across the political spectrum and communities to ensure their persistence, in particular in the context of wildly fluctuating political landscapes in the world⁸⁷,⁸⁸.

Achieving water sustainability in the decades to come will require a shift in focus and bolder steps and actions than those currently considered by international and national governmental bodies.
Filomena Silva¹,²,¹⁰, Ramia Al Bakain³,¹⁰, Gilles Pradeau⁴,¹⁰, Mathieu Ben Graham⁵, Jelena Ptoric⁶, Nassim Ait-Mouheb⁷, Elena Gomez⁸ & Patrick Allard ⁹,¹⁰

¹Aragonese Foundation for Research & Development (ARAID), Zaragoza, Spain. ²Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. ³The University of Jordan, School of Science, Department of Chemistry, Amman, Jordan. ⁴MAK'IT, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France. ⁵Générations Futures, Paris, France.

⁶Arena for Journalism in Europe, Amsterdam, Netherlands. ⁷INRAE, UMR GEAU, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France. ⁸HydroSciences Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.

⁹Institute for Society & Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA. ¹⁰These authors contributed equally: Filomena Silva, Ramia Al Bakain, Gilles Pradeau. ✉e-mail: pallard@ucla.edu

Received: 24 July 2024; Accepted: 16 October 2024;
Published online: 29 October 2024

## References

1. United Nations Statistics Division. — SDG indicators. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023.

2. Malekpour, S. et al. What scientists need to do to accelerate progress on the SDGs. *Nature* **621**, 250–254 (2023).

3. WHO/UNICEF joint monitoring programme for water supply, sanitation and hygiene. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene. https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/jmp-2023-wash-households-launch-version.pdf (2023).

4. Environment, U. N. Global Chemicals Outlook II: From Legacies to Innovative Solutions. UNEP-UN Environment Programme https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-chemicals-outlook-ii-legacies-innovative-solutions (2019).

5. Judson, R. et al. ACToR — aggregated computational toxicology resource. *Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.* **233**, 7–13 (2008).

6. Andersen, I. Globally, 3 billion people at health risk due to scarce data on water quality. UNEP https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/globally-3-billion-people-health-risk-due-scarce-data-water-quality (2021).

7. Egephy, P. P. et al. The exposure data landscape for manufactured chemicals. *Sci. Total Environ.* **414**, 159–166 (2012).

8. Water scarcity. https://www.unicef.org/wash/water-scarcity.

9. Africa, N. EBB AND FLOW. https://environmentalmigration.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl1411/files/documents/9781464817465.pdf.

10. Report of the United Nations Conference on the Midterm Comprehensive Review of the Implementation of the Objectives of the International Decade for Action. 2018–2028.

11. Yee, M. S.-L. et al. Impact of microplastics and nanoplastics on human health. *Nanomaterials* (Basel) **11**, 496 (2021).

12. Amato-Lourenço, L. F. et al. Presence of airborne microplastics in human lung tissue. *J. Hazard. Mater.* **416**, 126124 (2021).

13. Ragusa, A. et al. Plasticenta: first evidence of microplastics in human placenta. *Environ. Int.* **146**, 106274 (2021).

14. Leslie, H. A. et al. Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. *Environ. Int.* **163**, 107199 (2022).

15. Hu, C. J. et al. Microplastic presence in dog and human testis and its potential association with sperm count and weights of testis and epididymis. *Toxicol. Sci.* kfae060 https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae060 (2024).

16. Marfella, R. et al. Microplastics and nanoplastics in atheromas and cardiovascular events. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **390**, 900–910 (2024).

17. Ali, N. et al. The potential impacts of micro-and-nano plastics on various organ systems in humans. *EbioMedicine* **99**, 104901 (2024).

18. INTERIM FINDINGS. A Policy Scenario Analysis. https://www.oecd.org/environment/plastics/Interim-Findings-Towards-Eliminating-Plastic-Pollution-by-2040-Policy-Scenario-Analysis.pdf.

19. Documents. UNEP - UN Environment Programme https://www.unep.org/inc-plastic-pollution/session-4/documents.

20. Suzuki, G. et al. Global discharge of microplastics from mechanical recycling of plastic waste. *Environ. Pollut.* **348**, 123855 (2024).

21. Beyond Plastics. The False Promise Of Bioplastics and Compostable Plastics. https://www.beyondplastics.org/fact-sheets/bad-news-about-bioplastics (2024).

22. ANSES. Plastics are not compatible with domestic composting. https://www.anses.fr/en/content/plastics-not-compatible-domestic-composting (2022).

23. Růžičková, J. et al. Fate of microplastics during composting and their leachability. *Sustain. Chem. Pharm* **30**, 100867 (2022).

24. Kaing, V. et al. Photodegradation of biodegradable plastics in aquatic environments: Current understanding and challenges. *Sci. Total Environ.* **911**, 168539 (2024).

25. Wong, C. S. & Weisberg, S. B. Development of an accreditation process for analytical methods to measure microplastics in drinking water for regulatory monitoring. *Chemosphere* **353**, 141568 (2024).

26. Ribba, L. et al. Biodegradable plastics in aquatic ecosystems: latest findings, research gaps, and recommendations. *Environ. Res. Lett.* **17**, 033003 (2022).

27. Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R. & Law, K. L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. *Sci. Adv.* **3**, e1700782 (2017).

28. Beyond Plastics. The real truth about the U.S. plastics recycling rate. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5eda91260bbb7e7a4bf528d8/t62b2238152acaee761414d698/1655841666913/The-Real-Truth-about-the-USPlastic-Recycling-Rate-2021-Facts-and- Figures-5-4-22.pdf (2022).

29. INMAweb. BMRex, a European project designed to develop a technology for the removal and degradation of nano- and microplastics, is launched. *Instituto de Nanociencia y Materiales de Aragón* https://inma.unizar-csic.es/en/bmrex-a-european-project-designed-to-develop-a-technology-for-the-removal-and-degradation-of-nano-and-microplastics-is-launched/ (2023).

30. Malafeev, K. V., Apicella, A., Incarnato, L. & Scarfato, P. Understanding the impact of biodegradable microplastics on living organisms entering the food chain: A review. *Polymers* (Basel) **15**, 3680 (2023).

31. Microplastics initiative. https://ilsi.eu/scientific-activities/food-safety/ilsi-europe-initiative-on-microplastics-new/.

32. Fossil fuel and chemical industries registered more lobbyists at plastics treaty talks than 70 countries combined. Center for International Environmental Law https://www.ciel.org/news/fossil-fuel-and-chemical-industries-at-inc-3/ (2023).

33. Farrelly, T., Gammage, T., Carney Almroth, B. & Thompson, R. Global plastics treaty needs trusted science. *Science* **384**, 281 (2024).

34. United Nations Environment Programme. Intergovernmental negotiating committee to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment Fourth session - List of Participants. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/45553/INC4ListofParticipants.pdf (2024).

35. United Nations Environment Programme. Revised draft text of the international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/44526/RevisedZeroDraftText.pdf (2024).

36. Baztan, J. et al. Primary plastic polymers: Urgently needed upstream reduction. *Camb. prisms Plast.* **2**, e7 (2024).

37. CompTox Chemicals Dashboard. in *Encyclopedia of Toxicology* 221–224 (Elsevier, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824315-2.00840-x.

38. Brunn, H. et al. PFAS: forever chemicals—persistent, bioaccumulative and mobile. Reviewing the status and the need for their phase out and remediation of contaminated sites. *Environ. Sci. Eur.* **35**, 20 (2023).

39. Cousins, I. T. et al. The high persistence of PFAS is sufficient for their management as a chemical class. *Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts* **22**, 2307–2312 (2020).

40. Kotthoff, M., Müller, J., Jürling, H., Schlummer, M. & Fiedler, D. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in consumer products. *Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.* **22**, 14546–14559 (2015).

41. European Chemicals Agency. Consultation on a proposed restriction on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/aea5537d-b698-3b75-4b67-0cadd0f11d3 (2023).

42. Cousins, I. T., Johansson, J. H., Salter, M. E., Sha, B. & Scheringer, M. Outside the safe operating space of a new planetary boundary for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). *Environ. Sci. Technol.* **56**, 11172–11179 (2022).

43. Andrews, D. Q. & Naidenko, O. V. Population-wide exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from drinking water in the United States. *Environ. Sci. Technol.* **7**, 931–936 (2020).

44. Smalling, K. L. et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in United States tapwater: Comparison of underserved private-well and public-supply exposures and associated health implications. *Environ. Int.* **178**, 108033 (2023).

45. Breitmeyer, S. E. et al. Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in Pennsylvania surface waters: A statewide assessment, associated sources, and land-use relations. *Sci. Total Environ.* **888**, 164161 (2023).

46. Concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in tapwater collected throughout the United States. 2021–2022.

47. Fenton, S. E. et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance toxicity and human health review: Current state of knowledge and strategies for informing future research. *Environ. Toxicol. Chem.* **40**, 606–630 (2021).

48. Water framework directive. *Environment* https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/water/water-framework-directive_en.

49. REACH regulation. *Environment* https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/chemicals/reach-regulation_en.

50. Surface water chemical status. https://water.europa.eu/freshwater/europe-freshwater/water-framework-directive/surface-water-chemical-status-pressures.

51. Europe's groundwater — a key resource under pressure. *European Environment Agency* https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/europes-groundwater/europes-groundwater (2022).

52. Cordner, A. et al. PFAS contamination in Europe: Generating knowledge and mapping known and likely contamination with "expert-reviewed" journalism. *Environ. Sci. Technol.* **58**, 6616–6627 (2024).

53. Us Epa, O. A. Biden-Harris Administration Finalizes First-Ever National Drinking Water Standard to Protect 100M People from PFAS pollution. (2024).

54. California's approach to PFAS regulation creates compliance challenges. *BakerHostetler* https://www.bakerlaw.com/insights/califomias-approach-to-pfas-regulation-creates-compliance-challenges/ (2024).

55. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) - ECHA. https://echa.europa.eu/hot-topics/perfluoroalkyl-chemicals-pfas.
56. No title. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0400.

57. European Environmental Bureau. Policy briefing: Toxic tide rising: time to tackle PFAS National approaches to address PFAS in drinking water across Europe. https://eeb.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/PFAS-in-drinking-water-briefing-final-1.pdf (2023).

58. Oct, O. Office of the governor. https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AB-727-VETO.pdf.

59. PROPOSAL FOR A RESTRICTION. ANNEX XV RESTRICTION REPORT. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/f605d4b5-7c17-7414-8823-b49b9fd43aea.

60. Us Epa, O. A. Biden-Harris Administration Proposes First-Ever National Standard to Protect Communities from PFAS in drinking water. (2023).

61. Council of the European Union. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning urban wastewater treatment. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7108-2024-INIT/en/pdf (2024).

62. Aqueduct country ranking. https://www.wri.org/applications/aqueduct/country-rankings/.

63. Jagerskog, A. Water Scarcity Challenges in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). (New York, 2006).

64. Open knowledge repository. Ref. Rev. 29, 21-22 (2015).

65. Mateo-Sagasta, J. et al. Expanding water reuse in the Middle East and North Africa. https://rewater-mena.iwmi.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2023/04/Expanding_water_reuse_in_the_Middle_East_and_North_Africa-Policy_report.pdf (2023).

66. Sourcebook, A. Water reuse in the Middle East and North Africa. https://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/Books/PDF/water_reuse_in_the_middle_east_and_north_africa-a_sourcebook.pdf.

67. Ait-Mouheb, N. et al. The reuse of reclaimed water for irrigation around the Mediterranean Rim: a step towards a more virtuous cycle? Reg. Environ. Change 18, 693-705 (2018).

68. Kherbache, N. & Oukaci, K. Assessment of capital expenditure in achieving sanitation-related MDG targets and the uncertainties of the SDG targets in Algeria. World Dev. Perspect. 19, 100236 (2020).

69. Ait-Mouheb, N., Mayaux, P.-L., Mateo-Sagasta, J., Hartani, T. & Molle, B. Water reuse: A resource for Mediterranean agriculture. in Water Resources in the Mediterranean Region 107-136 (Elsevier, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818086-0-0.00005-4.

70. Tortajada, C. Contributions of recycled wastewater to clean water and sanitation Sustainable Development Goals. Npj Clean Water 3, 1-6 (2020).

71. Zekri, S., Ahmed, M., Chaieb, R. & Ghaffour, N. Managed aquifer recharge using quaternary- treated wastewater: an economic perspective. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 30, 246-261 (2014).

72. Bekaddour, S., Hartani, T., Mayaux, P.-L. & Ait-Mouheb, N. A story of hope and frustration: a wastewater-based agricultural frontier in the Algerian Sahara. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 1-14 https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2024.2311803 (2024).

73. Molle, F., Closas, A. & Al-Zubari, W. Governing groundwater in the Middle East and North Africa Region. https://www.g-eau.fr/images/PRODUCTION/Articles_chercheurs/Molle_F/Governing_groundwater_in_the_MENA_region_Advances_in_Groundwater_Governance.pdf.

74. Tawfik, M. H. "Participatory" water and wastewater governance: an enabling development approach...or business as usual? ReWater MENA https://rewater-mena.iwmi.org/stories/participatory-water-and-wastewater-governance-an-enabling-development-approach-or-business-as-usual-2/ (2020).

75. Maertens, A., Golden, E. & Hartung, T. Avoiding regrettable substitutions: Green toxicology for sustainable chemistry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9, 7749-7758 (2021).

76. Qian, N. et al. Rapid single-particle chemical imaging of nanoplastics by SRS microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 121, e2300582121 (2024).

77. US Geological Survey. PFAS in US Tapwater Interactive Dashboard. https://www.usgs.gov/tools/pfas-us-tapwater-interactive-dashboard (2023)

78. Nyadjro, E. S. et al. The NOAA NCEI marine microplastics database. Sci. Data 10, 1-12 (2023).

79. United Nations Environment Programme. Plastic pollution science (updated for the fourth session of the intergovernmental negotiating committee). https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/45368/PlasticPollutionScience.pdf (2023)

80. Ng, C. et al. Addressing urgent questions for PFAS in the 21st century. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 12755 (2021).

81. Helmecke, M., Fries, E. & Schulte, C. Regulating water reuse for agricultural irrigation: risks related to organic micro-contaminants. Environ. Sci. Eur. 32, 4 (2020).

82. Al-Hazmi, H. E. et al. Wastewater reuse in agriculture: Prospects and challenges. Environ. Res. 236, 116711 (2023).

83. Asaad, S. & Suleiman, A. Socio-demographic factors and treated wastewater reuse in the MENA region: Insights and implications. Desalination 565, 116830 (2023).

84. Merino, N. et al. Degradation and removal methods for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in water. Environ. Eng. Sci. 33, 615-649 (2016).

85. Miri, S. et al. Biodegradation of microplastics: Better late than never. Chemosphere 286, 131670 (2022).

86. Valhondo, C. et al. Assessing the feasibility of sustainable materials to boost the sorption of pharmaceutical active compounds when included in reactive barriers in soil aquifer treatment for water reuse. Water (Basel) 15, 1393 (2023).

87. Mathiesen, K., Weise, Z. & Guillot, L. A triumphant right's first post-election target: Overturning Green Deal car ban. POLITICO https://www.politico.eu/article/european-election-green-deal-rollback-europes-far-right-greenhouse-gas-pollution-global-warming/ (2024).

88. Millman, O. US supreme court puts hold on EPA attempt to reduce pollution that drifts across states. The guardian (2024).

## Acknowledgements

The authors want to express their gratitude to the University of Montpellier MAK'IT team, especially Alvaro Romera and Gabriel López Porras, for their feedback on the manuscript. Credit for Fig. 1 to Amisha Gadani.

## Author contributions

FA, RAB, GP, and PA conceptualized the manuscript; FA, RAB, GP, MBB, JP, NAM, EG, and PA wrote and edited the manuscript.

## Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Additional information

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Patrick Allard.

Reprints and permissions information is available at
http://www.nature.com/reprints

Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

© The Author(s) 2024