# "One Method to Label Them All": A Single Fully Automated Protocol for GMP-Compliant 68Ga Radiolabeling of PSMA-11, Transposable to PSMA-I&T and PSMA-617

Juliette Fouillet, Charlotte Donzé, Emmanuel Deshayes, Lore Santoro, Léa Rubira, Cyril Fersing

► To cite this version:

Juliette Fouillet, Charlotte Donzé, Emmanuel Deshayes, Lore Santoro, Léa Rubira, et al. "One Method to Label Them All": A Single Fully Automated Protocol for GMP-Compliant 68Ga Radiolabeling of PSMA-11, Transposable to PSMA-I&T and PSMA-617. Current Radiopharmaceuticals, 2024, 17 (3), pp.285-301. 10.2174/0118744710293461240219111852. hal-04544435

HAL Id: hal-04544435

https://hal.science/hal-04544435v1

Submitted on 2 Dec 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
RESEARCH ARTICLE

# “One Method to Label Them All”: A Single Fully Automated Protocol for GMP-Compliant <sup>68</sup>Ga Radiolabeling of PSMA-11, Transposable to PSMA-I&T and PSMA-617

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Juliette Fouillet¹, Charlotte Donzé¹, Emmanuel Deshayes¹,², Lore Santoro¹,², Léa Rubira¹ and Cyril Fersing¹,³,*

¹Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; ²Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; ³IBMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Montpellier, France

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

**Abstract:** **Background:** Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an ideal target for molecular imaging and targeted radionuclide therapy in prostate cancer. Consequently, various PSMA ligands were developed. Some of these molecules are functionalized with a chelator that can host radiometals, such as <sup>68</sup>Ga for PET imaging. The <sup>68</sup>Ga radiolabeling step benefits from process automation, making it more robust and reducing radiation exposure.

**Objective:** To design a single automated radiolabeling protocol for the GMP-compliant preparation of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, transposable to the production of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T.

**Methods:** A GAIA® synthesis module and a GALLIAD® generator were used. Radio-TLC and radio-HPLC methods were validated for radiochemical purity (RCP) determination. Three [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 validation batches were produced and thoroughly tested for appearance and pH, radionuclide identity and purity, RCP, stability, residual solvent and sterility. Minimal modifications were made to the reagents and disposables for optimal application to other PSMA ligands.

**Results:** [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 for clinical application was produced in 27 min. The 3 validation batches met the quality criteria expected by the European Pharmacopoeia to allow routine production. For optimal transposition to PSMA-617, the solid phase extraction cartridge was changed to improve purification of the radiolabeled product. For application to PSMA-I&T, the buffer solution initially used was replaced by HEPES 2.7 M to achieve good radiochemical yields. Residual HEPES content was checked in the final product and was below the Ph. Eur. threshold.

**Conclusion:** A single automated radiolabeling method on the GAIA® module was developed and implemented for <sup>68</sup>Ga radiolabeling of 3 PSMA ligands, with slight adjustments for each molecule.

**Keywords:** PET imaging, prostate cancer, PSMA-11, PSMA-617, PSMA-I&T, <sup>68</sup>Ga, automated synthesis, radiopharmacy.

ARTICLE HISTORY

Received: November 17, 2023

Revised: January 24, 2024

Accepted: February 01, 2024

DOI:
10.2174/0118744710293461240219111852

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

CrossMark

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

1. INTRODUCTION

First described in the late 1980s [1], prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein found on cells surface as a monomer or homodimer [2-4]. Its structure consists of a short cytoplasmic N-terminal region, a 24-amino acid transmembrane domain,

and a 707-amino acid extracellular C-terminal region [5-7]. Early studies on brain cells PSMA highlighted an N-acetylated-alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase (NAALDase) activity [2]. Also known as folate hydrolase 1 (FOLH1) or glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII), PSMA plays a role in folates and glutamate metabolism by releasing glutamic acid from folate polyglutamate derivatives and catalyzing the hydrolysis of N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) into glutamate and N-acetyl aspartate. In prostate cancer, PSMA-expressing cells consequently display increased folate uptake and rapid proliferation [8-10], as PSMA-catalyzed glutamate

<footnote>*Address correspondence to this author at the Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France and IBMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Montpellier, France; E-mail: cyril.fersing@icm.unicancer.fr</footnote>
release activates phospholipase C pathway and promotes
tumor growth [11, 12]. In prostate cancer cells, PSMA ex-
pression levels are approximately a thousand-fold higher
compared to normal prostate tissues, with the highest levels
observed in poorly differentiated and castration-resistant
tumor cells [13, 14]. Furthermore, only minimal PSMA ex-
pression is found in other organs such as proximal kidney
tubules, brain, lacrimal and salivary glands, peripheral gan-
glia, breast tissue, and duodenal brush border epithelium [13,
15, 16]. Accordingly, PSMA represents an ideal target for
the specific delivery of molecular imaging or targeted thera-
py agents to prostate cancer cells. In this perspective, small
molecules with high affinity and specificity for PSMA were
designed to bind this target, in particular for diagnostic and
therapy applications in nuclear medicine [17]. Regarding
their chemical structure, all PSMA ligands for clinical pur-
poses are composed of 3 parts (Fig. 1). First, a non-variable
PSMA-binding motif is formed of a pentanedioic acid acting
as glutamate mimic, a urea moiety acting as a complexing
group for a zinc atom located in the catalytic site of the en-
zyme [18, 19], and a lysine residue to obtain an easily func-
tionalizable pseudo-dipeptide. Then, a linker (or spacer) part
is used to introduce distance between the Glutamate-Urea-
Lysine (KuE) scaffold and the radiolabel-bearing moiety.
Most importantly, the linker tends to modulate the overall
physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of the
molecule [20–23]. For example, while a simple 6-
aminohexanoic acid (Ahx) chain is used in PSMA-11 [24], a
naphtylalanine/tranexamic acid group is introduced in
PSMA-617 to enhance tumor uptake and reduce renal
tracer accumulation [25, 26]. Similarly, the longer linker of
PSMA-I&T (PSMA-1) containing both phenylalanine and
iodotyrosine contributes to the higher internalization capaci-
ty of the molecule [27, 28]. Finally, a chemical group suita-
ble for bearing a radioactive atom functionalizes these con-
structs. This includes dedicated prosthetic groups to accom-
modate non-metallic radioelements (e.g. ¹⁸F, carried by a 6-
[¹⁸F]fluoronicotinic acid prosthetic group in [¹⁸F]DCFPyL
[29]) and chelating moieties for radiometals complexation.
For diagnostic applications, ⁶⁸Ga emerged as an ideal radio-
element for PET imaging, owing to its availability via a
⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga generator and its straightforward, well-mastered
radiochemical characteristics [30]. For the complexation of
⁶⁸Ga, linear chelators such as HBED-CC are widely adopted,
as they allow rapid complexation and low-demand radio-
labeling conditions [21, 31-33]. Featured in PSMA-11 [21],
HBED-CC is especially suited to ⁶⁸Ga, but is incompatible
with other radiometals. Consequently, cyclic chelating
agents are more likely to be used for theranostic applications.
Although such complexing agents are more demanding re-
garding radiolabeling conditions, they are also more versatile
and accommodate a wide variety of radiometals. Thus, a
DOTA chelator was chosen in PSMA-617, allowing com-
plexation with both ⁶⁸Ga for PET imaging and beta-minus
emitter ¹⁷⁷Lu, or even alpha emitter ²²⁵Ac for targeted radio-
nuclide therapy [34]. Similarly, a DOTAGA chelator derived
from DOTA was introduced in PSMA-I&T, enabling
theranostic use and enhancing the overall hydrophilicity of
the molecule [27]. To date, PSMA-11 stands out as the most
widely used PSMA ligand for ⁶⁸Ga PET imaging of prostate

cancer, however, PSMA-617 [35-43] and PSMA-I&T [44-
52] can also be radiolabeled with ⁶⁸Ga and used in clinical
settings, mostly through research protocols.

To ensure a reliable, robust, and good manufacturing
process (GMP)-compliant preparation procedure, the in-
house radiolabeling of molecules such as PSMA ligands
benefits from automation, with the growing use of synthesis
modules [53]. A series of models is commercially available,
most of them relying on single-use tubing sets and dedicated
reagent kits. So far, the radiosynthesis of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-
11 was reported in detail on Scintomics GRP [54, 55], GE
TRACERlab FX<sub>FN</sub> [56, 57], Trasis miniAiO [58, 59], Eckert
& Ziegler Modular-Lab PharmTracer [60] and iPHASE Mul-
tiSyn [61] modules, but was not extensively described on the
GAIA® automaton (Elysia-Raytest) [62]. Thus, we present
herein a comprehensive report on the development and vali-
dation of all the protocols for the automated, GMP-compliant
⁶⁸Ga radiolabeling of PSMA-11 on a GAIA® synthesis mod-
ule and for the corresponding quality controls (QCs). In ad-
dition, the applicability of this automated radiolabeling pro-
cess to other PSMA ligands was studied with the preparation
of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T.

## 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

### 2.1. Reagent and Devices

GMP-grade PSMA-11 and [naïtGa]Ga-PSMA-11 reference
standards were purchased from ABX pharmaceuticals (Ad-
vanced Biochemical Compounds, Germany) as lyophilized
products in aliquots of 10 µg and 500 µg per vial, respective-
ly. Sterile, single-use fluidic labelling kits for ⁶⁸Ga labeling
(reference RT-01-H) and reagent kits (reference RT-101)
were also purchased from ABX Pharmaceuticals. A reagent
kit included SCX (Bond Elut 100 mg with appropriate Luer
adapter cap) and C₁₈ cartridges (Sep-Pak® Plus 360 mg
sorbent), ammonium acetate buffer 0.08 M pH 4.6 (~4 mL),
isotonic saline 0.9% (~8.6 mL), ethanol 60% (1.5 mL) and
absolute ethanol (5 mL) vials, sodium chloride 5 M pH 1
(0.5 mL) syringe, water for injections (WFI, 100 mL) and
0.22 µm filter (Minisart® 0.22 µm, 13 mm). ⁶⁸Ga was ob-
tained by elution of a pharmaceutical-grade ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga gener-
ator (GALLIAD® 1850 MBq, IRE Elit, Belgium) with ~1.1
mL of a 0.1 M HCl solution. The automated radiosynthesis
of ⁶⁸Ga-labeled PSMA ligands was conducted on a GAIA®
synthesis module (Elysia-Raytest, Germany) driven by the
appropriate software (GAIA control, Elysia-Raytest, Germa-
ny). Production was conducted within the radiopharmaceuti-
cals preparation unit (GMP grade C clean room) in a grade A
shielded cell with a laminar airflow (MEDI 9000 Research
4R, LemerPax, France), with both the automated synthesis
module and the ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga generator placed in the hot cell.
Radioactivity in the product vial and in patient doses was
measured in a calibrated ionization chamber (CRC®-25R,
Capintec, USA).

### 2.2. Detailed Production Process of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11

Before starting the synthesis, the C₁₈ cartridge was
properly preconditioned with 5 mL absolute ethanol and 5
mL WFI, then the single-use kit was set up with reagents on
the automaton (Fig. 2). After initialization of the customized
synthesis protocol, the module performed a kit integrity test
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. (1).** Comparison of the chemical structure of the linker and chelator moieties found in ⁶⁸Ga-radiolabelled PSMA ligands used as PET imaging agents. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. (2).** Configuration of the GAIA® module for the synthesis of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The ramps are identified A, B and C and the valves are numbered from 1 to 5 on each ramp. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>Table 1. Summary of process steps of the automated synthesis of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11.</caption><tr><td>1</td><td>Drying of the tubing set and of the C<sub>18</sub> SPE cartridge with filtered air.</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Kit integrity test (pressurization >1500 mbar and pressure reduction of not more than 400 mbar over 20 sec).</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Addition of PSMA-11 solubilized in the buffer to the reaction vial.</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Conditioning of SCX and C<sub>18</sub> cartridges with WFI and purging of the tubing with filtered air.</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Generator elution: vacuum building-up and natural elution for 60 sec followed by final active elution for 140 sec.</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>The passing of the eluate through the SCX cartridge and retention of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga<sup>3+</sup> on the cartridge.</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Washing of the SCX cartridge with WFI, purge with filtered air and elution of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga<sup>3+</sup> with 0.5 mL NaCl 5 M pH 1 to the reaction vial.</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Labeling at 97°C during 8 min.</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Transfer of the reaction mixture from the reaction vial onto the C<sub>18</sub> SPE cartridge.</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>Washing of the reaction vial with 10 mL WFI and transfer from the reaction vial onto the C<sub>18</sub> SPE cartridge.</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>C<sub>18</sub> cartridge rinsing with WFI and purging of the tubing with filtered air.</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 elution to the product vial with alternating ethanol 60% (total 1.5 mL) and NaCl 0.9% (total 1.5 mL).</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>Formulation of the final product with 7.1 mL NaCl 0.9%.</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>Product vial release and filter integrity testing.</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>Closing all valves, end of synthesis.</td></tr></table>

to prevent any leakage during preparation. Then, PSMA-11 solubilized in 2.8 mL of ammonium acetate buffer solution was transferred to the reaction vial and the SPE cartridges were conditioned with WFI, before the tubing lines were purged with filtered air. The ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga generator was subsequently eluted with 1.1 mL of 0.1 N HCl, the vacuum suction transferring the eluate through the SCX cartridge on which ⁶⁸Ga was trapped. After peristaltic pumping to finish the elution process, the SCX cartridge was washed with WFI before the tubing lines were purged with filtered air. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga³⁺ from the SCX cartridge was then eluted to the reaction vial with 0.5 mL of NaCl 5M pH 1. The radiolabeling reaction proceeded for a total of 8 minutes at a temperature of 97°C. The reaction medium was then transferred to the SPE cartridge, with subsequent rinsing of the reaction vial and tubing with ~10 mL WFI. Free [⁶⁸Ga]Ga³⁺, not retained by the SPE cartridge, was removed to the waste vial through a washing step with WFI while [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was trapped on the cartridge. The active substance was then eluted from the cartridge to the product vial by alternating fractions of 60% ethanol (1.5 mL total) and 0.9% NaCl (8.6 mL total). The majority of ⁶⁸Ga colloids potentially formed during radiolabeling remained trapped on the cartridge. Sterilizing filtration was ensured by a 0.22 µ end filter and the integrity of the filter was finally checked by the module at the end of the preparation by a bubble point integrity test (minimum value set at 2.5 bar). The overall [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 radiosynthesis process on the GAIA® module is summarized in Table 1 and the detailed automated sequence is provided in Supplementary materials.

To validate the preparation process of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, three standardized validation batches were produced and subjected to extensive QCs. The definition of the product

specifications was based on the Ph. Eur. monograph for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 [63].

## 2.3. Radiochemical Yield Calculation

Throughout the automated synthesis process, the activities measured on the SCX cartridge and on the C<sub>18</sub> cartridge were used to calculate radiochemical yields (RCY), expressed in %, according to the formula:

$$RCY = \frac{\text{Activity loaded on C}_{18} - \text{Post-elution activity on C}_{18}}{\text{Activity loaded on SCX cartridge}} \times 100$$

For routine production in clinical settings, a minimum total activity of 150 MBq at the end of the synthesis was set for the preparation of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, approximately representing the average dose for a single patient of standard weight.

## 2.4. Quality Controls for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11

### 2.4.1. Appearance and pH

The visual inspection of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparations was performed right after the end of the synthesis to check the absence of particulates in the sample and the colorlessness of the solution [63].

The pH was checked on the final compounded [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparations by using 2-zones Rota pH 1 - 11 indicator paper (VWR, PA, USA) to ensure that this value is within the accepted range (4 to 8 [63]) according to the synthesis process and is appropriate for intravenous injection.

### 2.4.2. Radionuclide Identity

A gamma-spectrometry analysis was conducted on a sample (~150 kBq) of each [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 validation batch using a Hidex AMG® (LabLogic, UK) gamma counter. This analysis aimed to measure the emitted energies, with a
special focus on the 511 keV and 1077 keV peaks from the
annihilation photons, as specified by the European Pharma-
copoeia [63, 64]. Half-life was determined by repeated
measurements of each validation batch sample over ~4 h (6
to 8 measurements per batch), aiming for a result within the
expected range of 61 to 75 minutes and with an anticipated
value of 67.71 min [65, 66].

To validate the linearity of the gamma counter-response,
successive dilutions of a $^{68}$Ga generator eluate were made to
obtain a range of 16 standards between 430 kBq/mL and 13
Bq/mL. Radioactive concentration (in Bq/mL) was plotted
with the gamma counter response (in CPM) normalized to
the initial measurement time to determine the linear correla-
tion coefficient R².

2.4.3. Radionuclide Purity

For radionuclide purity determination, the same valida-
tion batch samples used for radionuclide identity assays were
measured for 120 min in the gamma spectrometer, after a 48-
h decay and under the same geometric conditions. With these
settings, the eventual activity of $^{68}$Ga resulting from a $^{68}$Ge
breakthrough and any other radionuclide impurity with a
long half-life (t > 5 h) was measured. The total radioactivity
measured after 48 h should not be more than 0.001% of the
radioactivity initially measured in each sample [65].

2.4.4. Analytical HPLC Procedures

Radio-high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
analyses were carried out on a Nexera X3 apparatus (Shi-
madzu, Japan) using HPLC-grade solvents. The radio-HPLC
station consisted of a solvent degasser (DGU-405), a solvent
pump (LC40D), an autosampler (SIL-40) set at 20 µL injec-
tion volume, a column oven (CTO-40S) set at 30°C, a UV
detector (SPD-40 190-700 nm) set at 220 and 280 nm and a
radioactivity detector (GABI Nova with mid-energy probe
and 2 × 5 µL flow cell) connected in series. The stationary
phase was a C₁₈ ACE® Equivalence™ column, 3.0 x 150
mm, 110 Å pore size and 3 µm particle size. The flow rate
was 0.6 mL/min, and the mobile phase gradient was pro-
grammed from 0.1% TFA in water (A) to 0.1% TFA in ace-
tonitrile (B) as follows: 0 – 0.5 min 95/5 A/B; 0.5 – 10 min
linear gradient from 95/5 A/B to 60/40 A/B; 10 – 11 min
linear gradient from 60/40 A/B to 95/5 A/B; 11 – 16 min
95/5 A/B. Radio-HPLC analyses were performed using the
appropriate acquisition and analysis software (Gina Star 10,
Elysia-Raytest, Germany).

2.4.4.1. Radio-HPLC Method Validation

Validation of the radio-HPLC analytical method for RCP
determination of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was conducted by
adapting ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines to the analysis of radioac-
tive compounds [67].

To determine the linearity of radio detection, considering
the short physical half-life of <sup>68</sup>Ga, successive analyses from
the same [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 final product batch were car-
ried out. The areas of the two isomer peaks were summed up
to express the total area as a function of volume activity at
the time of analysis. The coefficient of determination R<sup>2</sup> was
then calculated by linear regression. Thus, eleven HPLC
measurements were performed between 21 min and 461 min
after the end of synthesis on a [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 sample

with an initial volume activity of 69.4 MBq/mL. The range
of activity volumes used for linearity assays covered the
range of values observed in clinical practice. A coefficient R²
≥0.99 was expected.

Specificity was determined by analyzing in triplicate three independent [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 batches, containing all components that may be present at the time of the HPLC QC of the preparation. Impurities that could be detected included free ⁶⁸Ga³⁺ (2 radio-HPLC peaks), ⁶⁸Ga-containing impurities (4 radio-HPLC peaks) probably consisting of radiolysis products and possibly the third isomer of the PSMA-HBED-CC complex with gallium-68 [24]. As the HPLC peaks of the two main [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 isomers were close, the specificity of the method was considered sufficient for a resolution >1.5 between these two peaks and with surrounding signals.

Repeatability, as a part of precision, was determined by
measuring the RCP of a [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparation,
repeated 6 times under identical operating conditions and
over a short time period. For each analysis, the area of each
detected chemical species was corrected for decay to calcu-
late the coefficient of variation (%CV) according to the for-
mula: %CV = s/m × 100, where s is the standard deviation of
the peak areas and m is the average of the peak areas. CV
values ≤ 5.0% were expected for each chemical species.

To appreciate accuracy and exclude underestimation of
impurities by irreversible retention on the stationary phase,
the proportion of injected activity recovered at the column
outlet was measured in triplicate over RCP analyses of a
single [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparation. Aliquots of the final
product and the post-column recuperation were counted in a
gamma counter, decay corrected, and volume activities were
compared to calculate recovery (%).

The limit of quantification (LOQ) of the radio-HPLC method was determined experimentally by successive analyses of samples from the same [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparation until the lowest volume activity with a signal-to-noise ratio >10 was reached. The LOQ was determined for both isomer 2 of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (characterized by a smaller peak than isomer 1) and for the smallest ⁶⁸Ga³⁺ impurity peak.

The limit of detection (LOD) of the radio-HPLC method for isomer 2 of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and for ⁶⁸Ga³⁺ impurity was determined in the same way as the LOQ until the lowest volume activity with a signal-to-noise ratio greater than 3 was reached.

To determine whether the method is capable of efficiently
resolving close chromatographic peaks, and that no com-
pound is co-eluted with another chemical species, a high-
resolution test was carried out on 3 [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11
batches. For this test, the gradient time set in the HPLC
method studied (9.5 min) was doubled to improve compound
separation. All other parameters remained unchanged.

2.4.4.2. Chemical Identity Determined by HPLC

A reference solution was prepared by dissolving 500 µg of [nαGa]Ga-PSMA-11 reference complex in 1 mL of a NaCl 0.9%/ethanol 60% (85/15) mixture. The reference solution was measured in triplicate under the HPLC conditions used
for the radiochemical purity analysis of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (see 2.4.4.). A [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparation batch was also measured in triplicate and relative retention times (RRT) between [natGa]Ga-PSMA-11 and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 were calculated according to the formula:

$$RRT = \frac{\text{Retention time of [}^{68}\text{Ga}\text{Ga-PSMA-11}}}{\text{Retention time of [nat}\text{Ga}\text{Ga-PSMA-11}}$$

RRT had to be between 0.95 and 1.05 for the peak of each isomer.

### 2.4.4.3. Radiochemical Purity Determined by HPLC

After synthesis, an aliquot of the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 product was analyzed by radio-HPLC according to the previously described method for RCP determination. Considering the high sensitivity of the radio-HPLC technique, an RCP >91% was expected.

### 2.4.5. Radiochemical Purity Determined by TLC

Radio-thin layer chromatography (TLC) analyses were performed using iTLC-SG strips (2 cm × 10 cm). A small drop of the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 product was placed on a strip 2 cm above the baseline. The strip was then placed in a development chamber containing aqueous 1 M NH₄OAc in methanol (1:1) as a mobile phase. The mobile phase was allowed to migrate approximately 1 cm below the top end of the strip. It was then removed from the chamber and placed into a TLC scanner (miniGITA® Star, Elysia-Raytest, Germany) to determine the % areas of radioactivity at the origin and the solvent front, using the appropriate acquisition software (TLC Control v.2.30, Raytest, Germany) and analysis software (GINA Star TLC™ v.6.0, Elysia-Raytest, Germany). In these conditions, Rf (⁶⁸Ga impurities) = 0.0–0.2 and Rf ([⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11) = 0.8–1.0. TLC analysis of a ⁶⁸Ga solution at pH 1 (metal in the form of gallium (III) ions) and a gallium solution at pH 9 (metal in the form of colloids) was carried out in triplicate to confirm the Rf of ⁶⁸Ga impurities (see Supplementary materials). It was also used to determine the LOQ of these impurities, measured at 5.65 kBq.

### 2.4.6. Radiochemical Stability

The RCP of the three validation batches was measured by radio-TLC and radio-HPLC immediately after synthesis and then every hour up to 4 h after preparation. The final product was stored over this period at room temperature, at 24 ± 2°C.

### 2.4.7. Adsorption in the Product Vial

A study was performed to prove the suitability of the product vial (TC-ELU-5, Curium, France), especially in terms of container-content interactions. From each [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 validation batch, 1 mL was withdrawn right after the end of synthesis and every hour up to 4 h. Each sample was measured in an ionization chamber, corrected for decay to the first measurement time, and the volumetric activities of each sample were compared. The coefficient of variation between the 4 volume activities of the same validation batch was expected <5%.

### 2.4.8. Bacterial Endotoxins

The endotoxin level was determined by using a calibrated Endosafe® nexgen-PTS™ unit (Charles River, MA, USA) that complies with Ph. Eur. 2.6.14. A limit of 175 endotoxin

units (EU) per maximal injected dose is recommended; thus, for the 10.1 mL preparation of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, the theoretical maximum limit would be 17.3 EU/mL. However, to guarantee the microbiological quality of the preparation, a slightly lower endotoxin limit was set at 12.5 EU/mL. The maximum significant dilution (MSD) of the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparation to be tested was calculated according to the formula:

$$MSD = L/S$$

With L being the detection limit for endotoxins in the sample tested set at <1.0 EU/mL, and S being the intrinsic sensitivity of the technique, which is 0.05 EU/mL. This dilution ensures that the sample does not interfere with the UV measurement of the assay (% recovery between 50 and 200 and low %CV between measurements).

### 2.4.9. Sterility Testing

Sterility tests were carried out on the three validation batches by direct inoculation method (Ph. Eur. 2.6.1 and 0125). Three 1 mL aliquots of the drug products were tested by a GMP-certified laboratory in accordance with Ph. Eur. It was expected that culture media containing preparation samples would not show microbial growth.

### 2.4.10. Determination of Residual Ethanol Content

To keep the ethanol concentration in the final product lower than 10% v/v, the volume of physiological saline in the final formulation was increased to 8.6 mL, so that the use of 1.5 mL of 60% ethanol is inevitably less than 9% v/v. In addition, gas chromatography (GC) analyses on the 3 standardized validation batches were performed on a GC-2010 AF instrument (Shimadzu, Japan) to quantify final ethanol concentration.

## 2.5. Reproducibility of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 Synthesis

After validation of the fully automated radiolabeling protocol for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparation, the final activity concentration of all the preparations made over the 9 months of use of a single ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga generator was recorded.

## 2.6. Transposition of the Automated Radiolabeling Procedure to the Preparation of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617

PSMA-617 was purchased from MedChem Express (NJ, USA). For [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 preparation, the automated sequence described above was used unchanged. The radiolabeling reaction involved 40 µg of vector. Among the reagents and consumables, the Sep-Pak® C₁₈ SPE cartridge (360 mg sorbent per cartridge) was replaced by a Sep-Pak® lite C₁₈ SPE cartridge (130 mg sorbent per cartridge). TLC and HPLC conditions for RCP determination of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 were the same as for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11.

## 2.7. Transposition of the Automated Radiolabeling Procedure to the Preparation of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T

PSMA-I&T was purchased from ABX (Germany). HEPES was purchased from Merck (Germany) and was of the highest available purity grade. For [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T preparation, the automated sequence described above was used unchanged. The radiolabeling reaction involved 40 µg
of vector. Among the reagents and consumables, ammonium acetate 0.08 M was replaced by HEPES 2.7 M as the reaction buffer. TLC and HPLC analytical conditions for RCP determination of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T were the same as for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The residual HEPES content in the final preparation was determined according to the standard TLC method listed in Ph. Eur. monographs [35]. Briefly, two separate spots (40 µL) of a 49.5 µg/mL HEPES reference solution (i.e., 500 µg in 10.1 mL) and test solution (final [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T) were deposited with capillary tubes on a TLC silica gel F254 plate coated with aluminum foil and dried during 10 min in a 37°C oven. The TLC was then developed in a chamber containing an acetonitrile/water/methanol solution (75:15:10) as the mobile phase. The development was stopped when the front of the mobile phase was 0.5 cm below the top end of the plate. Finally, HEPES was visualized after treatment of the developed TLC plate by exposure to iodine vapor. A 200 cm³ hermetically sealed iodine chamber containing a mixture of 2 g of solid iodine and 8 g of silica was used; complete burying of the TLC plate under the iodine/silica mixture for 5 min at 37°C allowed optimal revelation. Any spot had to be less intense than the reference solution spot.

# 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

## 3.1. Automated Radiolabeling Protocol

The fully automated production of ⁶⁸Ga-labeled PSMA ligands on the GAIA® module was completed in 27 min, from the start of the synthesis to the delivery of the radio-labeled compound in the product vial. The GMP-compliant sequence relied on two “bind and elute” approaches (for ⁶⁸Ga eluate concentration and radiocomplex purification) separated by an 8-minute heating step to allow radiolabeling. Of note, the use of an SCX cartridge eliminates the influence of the volume of ⁶⁸Ga eluate (and, therefore, the generator model), and could even allow eluates from more than one ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga generator to be processed for the same synthesis [68-70]. Therefore, this automated protocol potentially displays the necessary qualities for straightforward adaptation to the 68Ga radiolabeling of other chelator-bearing agents, for which preparation would follow the steps outlined in Table 1.

## 3.2. Radio-HPLC Method Validation

The analytical conditions described above allowed the identification of two main peaks on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 radio-HPLC chromatograms attributable to the two major stereomeric forms of the radiocomplex [24]. As the mean retention times of the two main peaks of the [nªGa]Ga-PSMA-11 reference solution detected in UV were comparable to those obtained in radiochemical detection with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (8'00 vs 8'05 for isomer 1 and 8'26 vs 8'29 for isomer 2), the chemical species identity was confirmed. A difference of 3-5 seconds was observed between the UV and radio measurements as the detectors were connected in series.

Results from the validation of the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 radio-HPLC control method are summarized in Table 2. Linearity of the radioactive detector was confirmed over the volume activity range 1-56 MBq/mL, with a good correlation

coefficient ($R^2$ = 0.9975) (Fig. 3). Sufficient resolution ($R > 3.31$) was observed between isomer 1 of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and the nearest radio-impurity (⁶⁸Ga radio-impurity 3), as well as between isomers 1 and 2 ($R > 1.99$), supporting the specificity of the method.

Successive RCP analyses of a [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparation showed very low variability in ⁶⁸Ga radio-impurity and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 isomers proportions (%CV from 0.069 to 0.19 and from 0.064 to 0.32, respectively), confirming that the method is repeatable. Slightly higher coefficients of variation were observed for the two ⁶⁸Ga³⁺ peaks (%CV from 1.39 to 1.58), probably due to their very small surface area. Good recovery (>95%) of the injected activity at the column outlet confirmed the accuracy of the method. LOQ and LOD for isomer 2 were reached with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparations of 8 MBq/mL and 1.05 MBq/mL, respectively. LOQ and LOD for the smallest ⁶⁸Ga³⁺ peak were reached with solutions containing 228 kBq/mL and 97 kBq/mL of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga³⁺, respectively. The total activity of the preparations used in these assays was systematically lower than the 150 MBq threshold set previously. The high-resolution test did not reveal any additional peaks when the solvent gradient time was doubled. Thus, HPLC discrimination of radioactive compounds contained in the final [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 solution was validated.

## 3.3. Production of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 Validation Batches

Overall quality control specifications and results for the three [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 validation batches are presented in Table 3. At the end of the synthesis, the final vial contained the mean activity of 660.7 ± 56.1 MBq, representing an average specific activity of 66.1 ± 5.6 MBq/µg of PSMA-11. These three validation batches were produced with a mean RCY of 68.3% ± 2.1%. Each final product appeared as a clear, colorless solution, with a pH of 6-7, as expected for a mixture of 0.9% saline and ethanol.

Gamma-spectrometry analysis performed on the validation batches identified the expected energy peaks, confirming radionuclide identity. Similarly, successive activity measurements on a sample from each validation batch found an average half-life of 69.16 ± 2.03 min (gamma counter linearity: $R^2$ = 0.994), compatible with the radionuclide ⁶⁸Ga. As expected from a radiopharmaceutical-grade ⁶⁸Ga eluate, the final preparation displayed excellent radionuclidic purity, with ⁶⁸Ge and γ-emitting impurities in a mean proportion of $2.06 \times 10^{-4}\% \pm 1.16 \times 10^{-4}\%$.

[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 validation batches were produced with high RCP, especially when measured by radio-TLC (mean RCP = 97.72% ± 0.04%). RCP values measured by radio-HPLC were slightly lower (from 91.24% to 94.81%), primarily due to the higher sensitivity of the method that detected 4 distinct radio-impurities, in addition to free ⁶⁸Ga³⁺. General aspects of the chromatograms obtained when measuring [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 RCP are shown in Fig. 4.

Radiochemical stability assessment on the final product, measured by radio-TLC and radio-HPLC, showed a steady mean RCP over a period of 4 h (Fig. 5), proving the strength of the radiometal-chelator association. Indeed, this result was expected in view of the high stability constant of the Ga(III)-
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. (3).** Concentration–peak area linear regression for RAD detector. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Summary of the specifications and results for the validation of the radio-HPLC method (RAD detection).</caption><thead><tr><th>Parameter</th><th>Criteria</th><th>Specifications</th><th>Results</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Identity</td><td>RRT</td><td>0.95–1.05</td><td>Isomer 1:1.01<br>Isomer 2:1.006</td></tr><tr><td>Linearity</td><td>R<sup>2</sup> value</td><td>R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.99</td><td>0.9975</td></tr><tr><td>Specificity</td><td>R value</td><td>R > 1.5</td><td>1.99–4.76</td></tr><tr><td>Repeatability (%)</td><td>RRT</td><td>CV ≤ 2</td><td>&lt; 1.8</td></tr><tr><td>Accuracy (%)</td><td>Recovery</td><td>≥ 95</td><td>95.6 ± 0.6</td></tr><tr><td>LOQ (MBq/mL)</td><td>Radio detection</td><td>Signal/noise ratio > 10</td><td>Isomer 2:8<br><sup>68</sup>Ga<sup>3+</sup>:0.228</td></tr><tr><td>LOD (MBq/mL)</td><td>Radio detection</td><td>Signal/noise ratio > 3</td><td>Isomer 2:1.05<br><sup>68</sup>Ga<sup>3+</sup>:0.097</td></tr><tr><td>HR test</td><td>Radio detection</td><td>No extra signal</td><td>No extra signal</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>**Table 3.** Summary of the product specifications of the three [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 validation batches.</caption><thead><tr><th>Test</th><th>Specifications</th><th>Batch 1</th><th>Batch 2</th><th>Batch 3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Appearance</td><td>Clear, colorless solution</td><td>Clear, colorless solution</td><td>Clear, colorless solution</td><td>Clear, colorless solution</td></tr><tr><td>Identification</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Energy of gamma photons (MeV)</td><td>0.511 and 1.077</td><td>0.511 and 1.077</td><td>0.511 and 1.077</td><td>0.511 and 1.077</td></tr><tr><td>Half-life (min)</td><td>61 – 75</td><td>71.23</td><td>67.33</td><td>68.09</td></tr><tr><td>Chemical identity</td><td>RRT between 0.95 and 1.05</td><td>Isomer 1: 1.010<br>Isomer 2: 1.006</td><td>Isomer 1: 1.010<br>Isomer 2: 1.006</td><td>Isomer 1: 1.008<br>Isomer 2: 1.006</td></tr></tbody></table>

(Table 3) Contd...
<table><thead><tr><th>Test</th><th>Specifications</th><th>Batch 1</th><th>Batch 2</th><th>Batch 3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>pH</td><td>4-8</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Sterility</td><td>Sterile</td><td>Sterile</td><td>Sterile</td><td>Sterile</td></tr><tr><td>Bacterial endotoxins</td><td>&lt; 12.5 EU/mL</td><td>&lt; 1 EU/mL</td><td>&lt; 1 EU/mL</td><td>&lt; 1 EU/mL</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>Radionuclidic Purity</strong></td></tr><tr><td>(⁶⁸Ga) Gallium</td><td>≥99.9%</td><td>99.999669%</td><td>99.999814%</td><td>99.999898%</td></tr><tr><td>(⁶⁸Ge) Germanium and γ-emitting impurities</td><td>≤0.001%</td><td>0.000331%</td><td>0.000186%</td><td>0.000102%</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><strong>Radiochemical Purity</strong></td></tr><tr><td>[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (HPLC)</td><td>≥91%</td><td>94.81%</td><td>91.24%</td><td>91.24%</td></tr><tr><td>[⁶⁸Ga]Ga³⁺ (HPLC)</td><td>≤2%</td><td>1.47%</td><td>1.05%</td><td>1.20%</td></tr><tr><td>[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (TLC)</td><td>≥95%</td><td>97.69%</td><td>97.71%</td><td>97.76%</td></tr><tr><td>[⁶⁸Ga]gallium impurities (TLC)</td><td>≤5%</td><td>2.31%</td><td>2.29%</td><td>2.24%</td></tr><tr><td>Filter integrity test</td><td>Bubble point measurement &gt;2500 mbar</td><td>3759 mbar</td><td>4107 mbar</td><td>3963 mbar</td></tr><tr><td>Radioactivity</td><td>&gt;150 MBq</td><td>721 MBq</td><td>610 MBq</td><td>651 MBq</td></tr><tr><td>Specific activity</td><td>-</td><td>72.1 MBq/µg</td><td>61.0 MBq/µg</td><td>65.1 MBq/µg</td></tr><tr><td>Radiochemical yield</td><td>-</td><td>70%</td><td>66%</td><td>69%</td></tr><tr><td>Stability over 4 h</td><td>-</td><td>≥92.71% (HPLC)<br>≥95.69% (TLC)</td><td>≥91.0% (HPLC)<br>≥95.28% (TLC)</td><td>≥91.09 (HPLC)<br>≥97.75% (TLC)</td></tr><tr><td>Adsorption in the product vial (%CV)</td><td>-</td><td>4.73</td><td>3.11</td><td>4.72</td></tr><tr><td>Ethanol content</td><td>&lt;10%</td><td>7.15%</td><td>7.55%</td><td>7.55%</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>(Fig. 4) Contd...</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. (4).** Representative radio-TLC (A) and radio-HPLC (B) chromatograms for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. (*A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article*).</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. (5).** Time course of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 RCP during stability tests, assessed by radio-TLC and radio-HPLC. (*A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article*).</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. (6).** Activity concentration values of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparations produced over the 9-months use of a single ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga generator. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).</figcaption></figure>

HBED complex (log Kd = 38.5 [71, 72]), which forms with rapid kinetics at room temperature.

Successive measurements of decay-corrected volume activities over 4 h were consistent, both within the same batch and between the three [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 validation batches (mean volume activity = 59.7 ± 3.2 MBq/mL). Coefficient of variation between measurements of a single sample were <5%, confirming the absence of significant radiocomplex adsorption on the vial surfaces.

Although not expected to exceed 9% of the total final volume, the average residual ethanol quantity in the three validation batches was measured by GC at 7.42% ± 0.23%, confirming the intended <10% value.

Regarding microbiological evaluation, the limulus amebocyte lysate test for bacterial endotoxin resulted in < 1 EU/mL in the three [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 validation batches. Similarly, sterility testing conducted on fluid thioglycollate medium and tryptic soy broth treated with samples of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and incubated at 30-35°C and 20-25°C, respectively, validated the sterility of the radiopharmaceuticals.

Following the approval of these batches, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was used for patients within our center. At the end of each synthesis, pH, RCP by TLC and HPLC, and bacterial endotoxins were measured as release QCs prior to patient injection. Over the 9-months use of a single ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga generator, the average volume activity of the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 preparations produced ranged between 70 and 40 MBq/mL (55 syntheses), with satisfactory reproducibility (Fig. 6).

However, in some syntheses, specific steps such as purifications could lead to a significant loss of activity.

### 3.4. Application of the Radiolabeling Method to the Preparation of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617

The ⁶⁸Ga radiolabeling protocols for PSMA-617 reported in the literature mention the use of different vector amounts [38, 72]. Initial experiments with the automated method described above involving only 20 µg of PSMA-617 were conducted, and were associated with low RCY (<20%). This was due to both the retention of a significant fraction of radioactivity on the C₁₈ cartridge and the elimination of a substantial amount of free ⁶⁸Ga³⁺ in the waste vial. In addition, the radiolabeled product was associated with a poor RCP (<80%). The use of 40 µg PSMA-617 solved this issue (mean RCP by TLC = 97.4% ± 1.1%; mean RCP by HPLC = 93.6% ± 0.9%, n = 3), this amount remaining lower than the maximum PSMA-617 vector quantities reported in the literature (i.e., 50 µg [72]). At the final purification step by SPE, the use of a Sep-Pak® C₁₈ cartridge containing 360 mg sorbent was associated with late elution of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 after all 60% ethanol (~1.5 mL) had passed through the cartridge. Comparatively, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was fully eluted after the passage of only two-thirds of the ethanol volume (~1 mL). The use of a smaller cartridge containing only 130 mg sorbent was a convenient solution for both retaining the radiolabeling product after the reaction and eluting it more effectively after a smaller proportion of the total ethanol eluent passed through the cartridge (Table 4). Of note, this change required a closer control of the formulation step completion, as a smaller cartridge implied greater
<table><caption>Table 4. Summary of changes made to the ⁶⁸Ga radiolabeling protocol of PSMA-11 for transposition to PSMA-617 and PSMA-I&T.</caption><thead><tr><th>Parameter</th><th>PSMA-11</th><th>PSMA-617</th><th>PSMA-I&T</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Vector amount</td><td>10 µg</td><td>40 µg</td><td>40 µg</td></tr><tr><td>Reaction buffer</td><td>Ammonium acetate 0.08 M</td><td>Ammonium acetate 0.08 M</td><td>HEPES 2.7 M</td></tr><tr><td>SPE cartridge</td><td>Sep-Pak® C<sub>18</sub><br>360 mg sorbent</td><td>Sep-Pak® lite C<sub>18</sub><br>130 mg sorbent</td><td>Sep-Pak® C<sub>18</sub><br>360 mg sorbent</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>(Fig. 7) Contd...</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. (7).** Representative radio-HPLC chromatograms for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (A), [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 (B) and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T (C). (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).</figcaption></figure>

resistance to liquid flow and, therefore, an increased throughput time for the 8.6 mL saline. The radio-TLC analysis of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 showed no difference when compared to [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. In radio-HPLC analysis, the retention time of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 was significantly longer compared to the two [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 isomers (10.68 min and 8.30/8.62 min, respectively) (Fig. 7). This may be due to the less hydrophilic properties of PSMA-617 compared with PSMA-11 (logP = -3.4 for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and logP = -4.3 for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 [73]). It can be assumed that this difference in physicochemical properties is partly due to the presence of a naphthyl moiety in the structure of PSMA-617, which slightly increases lipophilicity.

### 3.5. Application of the Radiolabeling Method to the Preparation of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T

For the ⁶⁸Ga radiolabeling of PSMA-I&T, the strict transposition of the conditions retained for PSMA-11 initially resulted in the retention of ~1/3 of the post-reaction activity on the C₁₈ cartridge, which could not be eluted by the 1.5 mL of ethanol 60%. The remaining ~2/3 of the activity was directly eliminated in the waste vial without retention on the SPE cartridge. Replacing the SPE cartridge with a C₁₈ 130 mg or a less lipophilic OASIS HLB 130 mg cartridge did not solve this issue. The pH of the reaction medium was checked and measured at 3.2, demonstrating good compatibility with ⁶⁸Ga radiolabeling. Most of the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T preparation conditions reported in the literature mention the use of high-concentration HEPES buffer (2.7 M) for radiolabeling [27, 28]. Thus, ammonium acetate 0.08 M buffer was replaced in the original PSMA-11 radiolabeling protocol with HEPES 2.7 M buffer, allowing efficient transposition to PSMA-I&T (Table 4). As expected, the results obtained with

this buffer were considerably better, with a 65% RCY and a >95% RCP in HPLC.

Notably, the radio-HPLC spectrum of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T was characterized by a particular profile (Fig. 7C), already described in the literature [74] and probably due to the formation of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-(R)- and (S)-DOTAGA isomers (mean retention times: 10.51/10.61 min, respectively) [75]. The final SPE purification step should allow the elimination of the HEPES buffer involved in the radiolabeling reaction. To ensure that HEPES traces in the final preparation remained below the thresholds recommended by the Ph. Eur. (< 500 µg/injected dose, i.e., 10.1 mL if the total preparation volume was injected into a single patient), the semi-quantitative TLC control method recommended by Ph. Eur. [63] was used, and confirmed a concentration below the specified limit (see Supplementary materials). A 10-fold lower molarity (0.3 M) of HEPES was tested to investigate the influence of the buffer concentration on the radiolabeling outcome, but only ~30% of the radioactivity involved in the reaction was effectively recovered as [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T at the end of the synthesis.

This underlines the importance of the nature and concentration of the buffer solution in the reliability of the radiolabeling process. Therefore, although the general automated radiolabeling protocol developed here can be transposed to the various PSMA ligands studied, a detailed evaluation of the influence of each reaction parameter involved in ⁶⁸Ga radiolabeling seems worthwhile to be performed for every specific vector molecule in order to identify the most suitable preparation conditions. In addition, the application of this automated radiolabeling protocol to the synthesis of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 or [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T for human use would require the use of pharmaceutical-grade reagents
and ingredients, such as those complying with Ph. Eur. specifications.

## CONCLUSION

In the present work, a GMP-compliant synthesis method of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 on the GAIA® module was validated, as well as the associated QCs. This protocol was successfully applied to the related prostate-targeting molecules PSMA-617 and PSMA-I&T to prepare the corresponding ⁶⁸Ga complexes, with slight adaptations of the reagents and disposables used. This highlights that although all PSMA ligands are directed at the same target, each of these molecules offers specific physicochemical characteristics that should be considered when developing an automated ⁶⁸Ga radiolabeling method. Furthermore, the variety of PSMA ligands tends to continuously expand, given the ongoing interest in these compounds as molecular targeting agents in nuclear medicine. In this context, new vectors susceptible to automated radiolabeling continue to be developed and evaluated in humans, such as PSMA-11-derived [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 [40, 76-80], NOTA derivative [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P137 [81, 82] or the latest FDA-approved radiohybrid agent flotufolastat [83, 84].

## LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

CPM = Counts Per Minute

GMP = Good Manufacturing Process

HPLC = High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

LOD = Limit of Detection

LOQ = Limit of Quantification

PSMA = Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen

RCP = Radiochemical Purity

RCY = Radiochemical Yield

TLC = Thin-Layer Chromatography

## ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATION

Not applicable.

## HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

Not applicable.

## CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

## AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data that support the findings of this study will be made available from the corresponding author [C.F.] upon request.

## FUNDING

None.

## CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

## SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary material is available on the publisher's website along with the published article.

## REFERENCES

[1] Horoszewicz, J.S.; Kawinski, E.; Murphy, G.P. Monoclonal antibodies to a new antigenic marker in epithelial prostatic cells and serum of prostatic cancer patients. *Anticancer Res.*, **1987**, *7*(5B), 927-935.

PMID: 2449118

[2] Carter, R.E.; Feldman, A.R.; Coyle, J.T. Prostate-specific membrane antigen is a hydrolase with substrate and pharmacologic characteristics of a neuropeptidase. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.*, **1996**, *93*(2), 749-753.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.2.749 PMID: 8570628

[3] Pinto, J.T.; Suffoletto, B.P.; Berzin, T.M.; Qiao, C.H.; Lin, S.; Tong, W.P.; May, F.; Mukherjee, B.; Heston, W.D. Prostate-specific membrane antigen: A novel folate hydrolase in human prostatic carcinoma cells. *Clin. Cancer Res.*, **1996**, *2*(9), 1445-1451.

PMID: 9816319

[4] Schülke, N.; Varlamova, O.A.; Donovan, G.P.; Ma, D.; Gardner, J.P.; Morrissey, D.M.; Arrigale, R.R.; Zhan, C.; Chodera, A.J.; Surowitz, K.G.; Maddon, P.J.; Heston, W.D.W.; Olson, W.C. The homodimer of prostate-specific membrane antigen is a functional target for cancer therapy. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.*, **2003**, *100*(22), 12590-12595.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1735443100 PMID: 14583590

[5] Israeli, R.S.; Powell, C.T.; Fair, W.R.; Heston, W.D. Molecular cloning of a complementary DNA encoding a prostate-specific membrane antigen. *Cancer Res.*, **1993**, *53*(2), 227-230.

PMID: 8417812

[6] Leek, J.; Lench, N.; Maraj, B.; Bailey, A.; Carr, I.M.; Andersen, S.; Cross, J.; Whelan, P.; MacLennan, K.A.; Meredith, D.M.; Markham, A.F. Prostate-specific membrane antigen: Evidence for the existence of a second related human gene. *Br. J. Cancer*, **1995**, *72*(3), 583-588.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1995.377 PMID: 7669565

[7] Davis, M.I.; Bennett, M.J.; Thomas, L.M.; Bjorkman, P.J. Crystal structure of prostate-specific membrane antigen, a tumor marker and peptidase. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.*, **2005**, *102*(17), 5981-5986.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502101102 PMID: 15837926

[8] Figueiredo, J.C.; Grau, M.V.; Haile, R.W.; Sandler, R.S.; Summers, R.W.; Bresalier, R.S.; Burke, C.A.; McKeown-Eyssen, G.E.; Baron, J.A. Folic acid and risk of prostate cancer: Results from a randomized clinical trial. *J. Natl. Cancer Inst.*, **2009**, *101*(6), 432-435.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp019 PMID: 19276452

[9] Yao, V.; Berkman, C.E.; Choi, J.K.; O'Keefe, D.S.; Bacich, D.J. Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), increases cell folate uptake and proliferation and suggests a novel role for PSMA in the uptake of the non-polyglutamated folate, folic acid. *Prostate*, **2010**, *70*(3), 305-316.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pros.21065 PMID: 19830782

[10] Rycyna, K.J.; Bacich, D.J.; O'Keefe, D.S. Opposing roles of folate in prostate cancer. *Urology*, **2013**, *82*(6), 1197-1203.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.012 PMID: 23992971

[11] Carver, B.S.; Chapinski, C.; Wongvipat, J.; Hieronymus, H.; Chen, Y.; Chandarlapaty, S.; Arora, V.K.; Le, C.; Koutcher, J.; Scher, H.; Scardino, P.T.; Rosen, N.; Sawyers, C.L. Reciprocal feedback regulation of PI3K and androgen receptor signaling in PTEN-deficient prostate cancer. *Cancer Cell*, **2011**, *19*(5), 575-586.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.04.008 PMID: 21575859
[12] Kaittanis, C.; Andreou, C.; Hieronymus, H.; Mao, N.; Foss, C.A.; Eiber, M.; Weirich, G.; Panchal, P.; Gopalan, A.; Zurita, J.; Achilefu, S.; Chiosis, G.; Ponomarev, V.; Schwaiger, M.; Carver, B.S.; Pomper, M.G.; Grimm, J. Prostate-specific membrane antigen cleavage of vitamin B9 stimulates oncogenic signaling through metabotropic glutamate receptors. *J. Exp. Med.*, **2018**, *215*(1), 159-175.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20171052 PMID: 29141866

[13] Israeli, R.S.; Powell, C.T.; Corr, J.G.; Fair, W.R.; Heston, W.D. Expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen. *Cancer Res.*, **1994**, *54*(7), 1807-1811.
PMID: 7511053

[14] Kinoshita, Y.; Kuratsukuri, K.; Landas, S.; Imaida, K.; Rovito, P.M., Jr; Wang, C.Y.; Haas, G.P. Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in normal and malignant human tissues. *World J. Surg.*, **2006**, *30*(4), 628-636.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0544-5 PMID: 16555021

[15] Uhlén, M.; Fagerberg, L.; Hallström, B.M.; Lindskog, C.; Oksvold, P.; Mardinoglu, A.; Sivertsson, Å.; Kampf, C.; Sjöstedt, E.; Asplund, A.; Olsson, I.; Edlund, K.; Lundberg, E.; Navani, S.; Szigyarto, C.A.K.; Odeberg, J.; Djureinovic, D.; Takanen, J.O.; Hober, S.; Alm, T.; Edqvist, P.H.; Berling, H.; Tegel, H.; Mulder, J.; Rockberg, J.; Nilsson, P.; Schwenk, J.M.; Hamsten, M.; von Feilitzen, K.; Forsberg, M.; Persson, L.; Johansson, F.; Zwahlen, M.; von Heijne, G.; Nielsen, J.; Pontén, F. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. *Science*, **2015**, *347*(6220), 1260419.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1260419 PMID: 25613900

[16] Werner, R.A.; Sheikhbahaei, S.; Jones, K.M.; Javadi, M.S.; Solnes, L.B.; Ross, A.E.; Allaf, M.E.; Pienta, K.J.; Lapa, C.; Buck, A.K.; Higuchi, T.; Pomper, M.G.; Gorin, M.A.; Rowe, S.P. Patterns of uptake of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted ¹⁸F-DCFPyL in peripheral ganglia. *Ann. Nucl. Med.*, **2017**, *31*(9), 696-702.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1201-4 PMID: 28831739

[17] Debnath, S.; Zhou, N.; McLaughlin, M.; Rice, S.; Pillai, A.K.; Hao, G.; Sun, X. PSMA-Targeting imaging and theranostic agents—current status and future perspective. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.*, **2022**, *23*(3), 1158.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031158 PMID: 35163083

[18] Kozikowski, A.P.; Nan, F.; Conti, P.; Zhang, J.; Ramadan, E.; Bzdega, T.; Wroblewska, B.; Neale, J.H.; Pshenichkin, S.; Wroblewski, J.T. Design of remarkably simple, yet potent urea-based inhibitors of glutamate carboxypeptidase II (NAALADase). *J. Med. Chem.*, **2001**, *44*(3), 298-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm000406m PMID: 11462970

[19] Yang, X.; Mease, R.C.; Pullambhatla, M.; Lisok, A.; Chen, Y.; Foss, C.A.; Wang, Y.; Shallal, H.; Edelman, H.; Hoye, A.T.; Attardo, G.; Nimmagadda, S.; Pomper, M.G. [¹⁸F]Fluorobenzoyllylsentanediocytic acid carbamates: New scaffolds for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). *J. Med. Chem.*, **2016**, *59*(1), 206-218.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01268 PMID: 26629713

[20] Banerjee, S.R.; Foss, C.A.; Castanares, M.; Mease, R.C.; Byun, Y.; Fox, J.J.; Hilton, J.; Lupold, S.E.; Kozikowski, A.P.; Pomper, M.G. Synthesis and evaluation of technetium-99m- and rhodium-labeled inhibitors of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). *J. Med. Chem.*, **2008**, *51*(15), 4504-4517.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm800111u PMID: 18637669

[21] Eder, M.; Schäfer, M.; Bauder-Wüst, U.; Hull, W.E.; Wängler, C.; Mier, W.; Haberkorn, U.; Eisenhut, M. 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. *Bioconjug. Chem.*, **2012**, *23*(4), 688-697.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bc200279b PMID: 22369515

[22] Benešová, M.; Bauder-Wüst, U.; Schäfer, M.; Klika, K.D.; Mier, W.; Haberkorn, U.; Kopka, K.; Eder, M. Linker modification strategies to control the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting and pharmacokinetic properties of DOTA-Conjugated PSMA Inhibitors. *J. Med. Chem.*, **2016**, *59*(5), 1761-1775.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01210 PMID: 26878194

[23] Ray Banerjee, S.; Chen, Z.; Pullambhatla, M.; Lisok, A.; Chen, J.; Mease, R.C.; Pomper, M.G. Preclinical comparative study of ⁶⁸Ga-Labeled DOTA, NOTA, and HBED-CC chelated radiotracers for targeting PSMA. *Bioconjug. Chem.*, **2016**, *27*(6), 1447-1455.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00679 PMID: 27076393

[24] Eder, M.; Neels, O.; Müller, M.; Bauder-Wüst, U.; Remde, Y.; Schäfer, M.; Hennrich, U.; Eisenhut, M.; Afshar-Oromieh, A.; Haberkorn, U.; Kopka, K. Novel preclinical and radiopharmaceutical aspects of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC: A new PET tracer for imaging of prostate cancer. *Pharmaceuticals*, **2014**, *7*(7), 779-796.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph7070779 PMID: 24983957

[25] Benešová, M.; Schäfer, M.; Bauder-Wüst, U.; Afshar-Oromieh, A.; Kratochwil, C.; Mier, W.; Haberkorn, U.; Kopka, K.; Eder, M. Preclinical evaluation of a tailor-made DOTA-Conjugated PSMA inhibitor with optimized linker moiety for imaging and endoradiotherapy of prostate cancer. *J. Nucl. Med.*, **2015**, *56*(6), 914-920.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.147413 PMID: 25883127

[26] Afshar-Oromieh, A.; Hetzheim, H.; Kratochwil, C.; Benesova, M.; Eder, M.; Neels, O.C.; Eisenhut, M.; Kübler, W.; Holland-Letz, T.; Giesel, F.L.; Mier, W.; Kopka, K.; Haberkorn, U. The theranostic PSMA Ligand PSMA-617 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer by PET/CT: Biodistribution in humans, radiation dosimetry, and first evaluation of tumor lesions. *J. Nucl. Med.*, **2015**, *56*(11), 1697-1705.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.161299 PMID: 26294298

[27] Weineisen, M.; Simecek, J.; Schottelius, M.; Schwaiger, M.; Wester, H.J. Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of DOTAGA-conjugated PSMA ligands for functional imaging and endoradiotherapy of prostate cancer. *EJNMMI Res.*, **2014**, *4*(1), 63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-014-0063-1 PMID: 26116124

[28] Weineisen, M.; Schottelius, M.; Simecek, J.; Baum, R.P.; Yildiz, A.; Beykan, S.; Kulkarni, H.R.; Lassmann, M.; Klette, I.; Eiber, M.; Schwaiger, M.; Wester, H.J. ⁶⁸Ga- and ¹⁷⁷Lu-Labeled PSMA I&T: Optimization of a PSMA-Targeted Theranostic Concept and First Proof-of-Concept Human Studies. *J. Nucl. Med.*, **2015**, *56*(8), 1169-1176.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.158550 PMID: 26089548

[29] Chen, Y.; Pullambhatla, M.; Foss, C.A.; Byun, Y.; Nimmagadda, S.; Senthamizhchelvan, S.; Sgouros, G.; Mease, R.C.; Pomper, M.G. 2-(3-1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl-ureido)-pentanedioic acid, [18F]DCFPyL, a PSMA-based PET imaging agent for prostate cancer. *Clin. Cancer Res.*, **2011**, *17*(24), 7645-7653.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1357 PMID: 22042970

[30] Meisenheimer, M.; Saenko, Y.; Eppard, E. Gallium-68: Radiolabeling of radiopharmaceuticals for pet imaging - a lot to consider. In: *Medical Isotopes*; Ali Raza Naqvi, S.; Babar Imrani, M., Eds.; IntechOpen, **2021**.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90615

[31] Taliaferro, C.H.; Martell, A.E. New Multidentate Ligands. XXVI: N,N'-Bis(2-Hydroxybenzyl)Ethylenediamine-N,N'-Bis(Methylenephosphonic Acid Monomethyl Ester), and N,N'-Bis(2-Hydroxybenzyl)Ethylenediamine-N,N'-Bis(Methylenephosphonic Acid Monoethyl Ester): New chelating ligands for trivalent metal ions. *J. Coord. Chem.*, **1984**, *13*(3), 249-264.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958978408073875

[32] Eder, M.; Wängler, B.; Knackmuss, S.; LeGall, F.; Little, M.; Haberkorn, U.; Mier, W.; Eisenhut, M. Tetrafluorophenolate of HBED-CC: A versatile conjugation agent for ⁶⁸Ga-labeled small recombinant antibodies. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging*, **2008**, *35*(10), 1878-1886.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0816-z PMID: 18509635

[33] Eder, M.; Krivoshein, A.V.; Backer, M.; Backer, J.M.; Haberkorn, U.; Eisenhut, M. ScVEGF-PEG-HBED-CC and scVEGF-PEG-NOTA conjugates: Comparison of easy-to-label recombinant proteins for [⁶⁸Ga]PET imaging of VEGF receptors in angiogenic vasculature. *Nucl. Med. Biol.*, **2010**, *37*(4), 405-412.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.02.001 PMID: 20447550

[34] Ling, S.W.; de Blois, E.; Hooijman, E.; van der Veldt, A.; Brabander, T. Advances in ¹¹⁷Lu-PSMA and ²²⁵Ac-PSMA radionuclide therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. *Pharmaceuticals*, **2022**, *14*(10), 2166.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102166 PMID: 36297601

[35] Liu, C.; Liu, T.; Zhang, N.; Liu, Y.; Li, N.; Du, P.; Yang, Y.; Liu, M.; Gong, K.; Yang, X.; Zhu, H.; Yan, K.; Yang, Z. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT: A promising new technique for predicting risk stratification.
fication and metastatic risk of prostate cancer patients. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging*, **2018**, *45*(11), 1852-1861.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4037-9 PMID: 29717333

[36] Wang, J.; Zang, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, Q.; Li, F.; Lin, Y.; Huo, L.; Jacobson, O.; Niu, G.; Fan, X.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, X. Pretherapeutic 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET May indicate the dosimetry of 177Lu-psma-617 and 177Lu-eb-psma-617 in main organs and tumor lesions. *Clin. Nucl. Med.*, **2019**, *44*(6), 431-438.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000002575 PMID: 30985422

[37] Li, Y.; Han, D.; Wu, P.; Ren, J.; Ma, S.; Zhang, J.; Song, W.; Lin, X.; Jiao, D.; Shi, S.; Yang, F.; Wu, J.; Meng, P.; Wen, W.; Kang, F.; Wang, J.; Qin, W. Comparison of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT with mpMRI for the detection of PCa in patients with a PSA level of 4–20 ng/ml before the initial biopsy. *Sci. Rep.*, **2020**, *10*(1), 10963.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67385-9 PMID: 32620790

[38] Liu, D.; Cheng, G.; Ma, X.; Wang, S.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, W.; Yang, W.; Wang, J. PET/CT using ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 versus ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose to differentiate low- and high-grade gliomas. *J. Neuroimaging*, **2021**, *31*(4), 733-742.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jon.12856 PMID: 34021667

[39] Wang, G.; Zhou, M.; Zang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, X. A pilot study of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT imaging and ¹⁷⁷Lu-EB-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma. *EJNMMI Res.*, **2022**, *12*(1), 52.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-022-00922-x PMID: 35984529

[40] Wang, G.; Hong, H.; Zang, J.; Liu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Fan, X.; Zhu, Z.; Zhu, L.; Kung, H.F. Head-to-head comparison of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 in dynamic PET/CT evaluation of the same group of recurrent prostate cancer patients. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging*, **2022**, *49*(3), 1052-1062.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05539-1 PMID: 34557930

[41] Lu, Q.; Long, Y.; Fan, K.; Shen, Z.; Gai, Y.; Liu, Q.; Jiang, D.; Cai, W.; Wan, C.; Lan, X. PET imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting tumor-associated endothelium using [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging*, **2022**, *49*(12), 4000-4013.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05884-9 PMID: 35763056

[42] Schollhammer, R.; Robert, G.; Asselineau, J.; Yacoub, M.; Vimont, D.; Balamoutoff, N.; Bladou, F.; Bénard, A.; Hindié, E.; Galerande, H.C.; Morgat, C. Comparison of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/CT in patients with localized prostate cancer who are candidates for radical prostatectomy: A prospective, single-arm, single-center, phase II study. *J. Nucl. Med.*, **2023**, *64*(3), 379-385.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.263889 PMID: 36215569

[43] Gao, X.; Tang, Y.; Chen, M.; Li, J.; Yin, H.; Gan, Y.; Zu, X.; Cai, Y.; Hu, S. A prospective comparative study of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM26 and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT imaging in suspicious prostate cancer. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging*, **2023**, *50*(7), 2177-2187.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06142-2 PMID: 36811661

[44] Derlin, T.; Weiberg, D.; von Klot, C.; Wester, H.J.; Henkenberens, C.; Ross, T.L.; Christiansen, H.; Merseburger, A.S.; Bengel, F.M. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for assessment of prostate cancer: Evaluation of image quality after forced diuresis and delayed imaging. *Eur. Radiol.*, **2016**, *26*(12), 4345-4353.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4308-4 PMID: 27011373

[45] Berliner, C.; Tienken, M.; Frenzel, T.; Kobayashi, Y.; Helberg, A.; Kirchner, U.; Klutmann, S.; Beyersdorff, D.; Budäus, L.; Wester, H.J.; Mester, J.; Bannas, P. Detection rate of PET/CT in patients with biochemical relapse of prostate cancer using [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA I&T and comparison with published data of [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA HBED-CC. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging*, **2017**, *44*(4), 670-677.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3572-5 PMID: 27896369

[46] Schmuck, S.; Mamach, M.; Wilke, F.; von Klot, C.A.; Henkenberens, C.; Thackeray, J.T.; Sohns, J.M.; Geworski, L.; Ross, T.L.; Wester, H.J.; Christiansen, H.; Bengel, F.M.; Derlin, T. Multiple time-point 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for characterization of primary prostate cancer. *Clin. Nucl. Med.*, **2017**, *42*(6), e286-e293.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000001589 PMID: 28221194

[47] Schmuck, S.; Nordlohne, S.; von Klot, C.A.; Henkenberens, C.; Sohns, J.M.; Christiansen, H.; Wester, H.J.; Ross, T.L.; Bengel, F.M.; Derlin, T. Comparison of standard and delayed imaging to improve the detection rate of [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA I&T PET/CT in patients

with biochemical recurrence or prostate-specific antigen persistence after primary therapy for prostate cancer. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging*, **2017**, *44*(6), 960-968.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3669-5 PMID: 28280856

[48] Meyrick, D.P.; Asokendaran, M.; Skelly, L.A.; Lenzo, N.P.; Henderson, A. The role of 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT in the pretreatment staging of primary prostate cancer. *Nucl. Med. Commun.*, **2017**, *38*(11), 956-963.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000738 PMID: 28922335

[49] Komek, H.; Can, C.; Yilmaz, U.; Altindag, S. Prognostic value of 68 Ga PSMA I&T PET/CT SUV parameters on survival outcome in advanced prostate cancer. *Ann. Nucl. Med.*, **2018**, *32*(8), 542-552.

[50] Yilmaz, U.; Komek, H.; Can, C.; Altindag, S. The role of (⁶⁸Ga)PSMA I&T in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Detection rate and the correlation between the level of PSA, Gleason score, and the SUVmax. *Ann. Nucl. Med.*, **2019**, *33*(8), 545-553.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-019-01360-x PMID: 31069696

[51] Cytawa, W.; Seitz, A.K.; Kircher, S.; Fukushima, K.; Tran-Gia, J.; Schirbel, A.; Bandurski, T.; Lass, P.; Krebs, M.; Polom, W.; Matuszewski, M.; Wester, H.J.; Buck, A.K.; Kübler, H.; Lapa, C. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for primary staging of prostate cancer. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging*, **2020**, *47*(1), 168-177.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04524-z PMID: 31529265

[52] Koehler, D.; Sauer, M.; Karimzadeh, A.; Apostolova, I.; Klutmann, S.; Adam, G.; Knipper, S.; Maurer, T.; Berliner, C. Evaluation of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT with additional late scans of the pelvis in prostate-specific antigen recurrence using the PROMISE criteria. *EJNMMI Res.*, **2022**, *12*(1), 66.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-022-00938-3 PMID: 36210356

[53] Decristoforo, C. Gallium-68 - a new opportunity for PET available from a long shelf-life generator - automation and applications. *Curr. Radiopharm.*, **2012**, *5*(3), 212-220.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874471011205030212 PMID: 22642389

[54] Szydlo, M.; Pogoda, D.; Kowalski, T.; Pociegieł, M.; Jadwinski, M.; Amico, A.d. Synthesis and quality control of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT tracer used in Prostate cancer imaging and comparison with 18F-fluorocholone as a reference point. *J. Pharm. Sci. Emerg. Drugs*, **2018**, *6*, 1.

[55] Assadi, M.; Dadgar, H. Quality control and GMP synthesis of ⁶⁸Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 for detection of low- and high-grade prostate cancer. *World J. Nucl. Med.*, **2019**, *19*(2), 93-98.

PMID: 32939194

[56] Kleynhans, J.; Rubow, S.; le Roux, J.; Marjanovic-Painter, B.; Zeevaart, J.R.; Ebenhan, T. Production of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA: Comparing a manual kit-based method with a module-based automated synthesis approach. *J. Labelled Comp. Radiopharm.*, **2020**, *63*(13), 553-563.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.3879 PMID: 32865290

[57] Garcia-Arguello, S.F.; Lopez-Lorenzo, B.; Ruiz-Cruces, R. Automated production of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTANOC and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 using a TRACERlab FX FN synthesis module. *J. Labelled Comp. Radiopharm.*, **2019**, *62*(3), 146-153.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.3706 PMID: 30672007

[58] Sorensen, M.A.; Andersen, V.L.; Hendel, H.W.; Vriamont, C.; Warnier, C.; Masset, J.; Huynh, T.H.V. Automated synthesis of ⁶⁸Ga/ ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA on the Trasis miniAllinOne. *J. Labelled Comp. Radiopharm.*, **2020**, *63*(8), 393-403.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.3846 PMID: 32374450

[59] Reverchon, J.; Khayi, F.; Roger, M.; Moreau, A.; Kryza, D. Optimization of the radiosynthesis of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 using a Trasis MiniAiO synthesizer: Do we need to heat and purify? *Nucl. Med. Commun.*, **2020**, *41*(9), 977-985.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001233 PMID: 32796487

[60] Fuscaldi, L.L.; Sobral, D.V.; Durante, A.C.R.; Mendonça, F.F.; Miranda, A.C.C.; da Cunha, M.L.; Malavolta, L.; Mejia, J.; de Barboza, M.F. Standardization of the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 radiolabeling protocol in an automatic synthesis module: Assessments for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. *Pharmaceuticals*, **2021**, *14*(5), 385.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14050385 PMID: 33918987
[61] Wichmann, C.W.; Ackermann, U.; Poniger, S.; Young, K.; Nguyen, B.; Chan, G.; Sachinidis, J.; Scott, A.M. Automated radiosynthesis of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 on the iPHASE MultiSyn module for clinical applications. *J. Labelled Comp. Radiopharm.*, **2021**, *64*(3), 140-146.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jlr.c.3889 PMID: 33067810

[62] Meisenheimer, M.; Kürpig, S.; Essler, M.; Eppard, E. Manual vs automated ⁶⁸Ga-radiolabelling - A comparison of optimized processes. *J. Labelled Comp. Radiopharm.*, **2020**, *63*(4), 162-173.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jlr.c.3821 PMID: 31845408

[63] European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & Healthcare (EDQM). Gallium (68Ga) PSMA-11 Injection. *Euro. Pharma.*, **2021**, *3044*, 1276-1277.

[64] European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & Healthcare (EDQM). Gallium (68Ga) PSMA-11 Injection. *Euro. Pharma.*, **2022**, *2482*, 1274-1276.

[65] European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & Healthcare (EDQM). Gallium (68Ga) PSMA-11 Injection. *Euro. Pharma.*, **2013**, *2464*, 1273-1274.

[66] McCutchan, E.A. Nuclear data sheets for A = 68. *Nucl. Data Sheets*, **2012**, *113*(6-7), 1735-1870.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2012.06.002

[67] CPMP/ICH/381/95 - ICH harmonised tripartite guideline - Validation of analytical procedures: Text and methodology Q2(R1). **2014.** Available from: CPMP/ICH/381/95 - ICH harmonised tripartite guideline - Validation of analytical procedures: Text and methodology Q2(R1) (Accessed on: 27 Oct 2023).

[68] Nader, M.; Herrmann, K.; Kunkel, F.; Zarrad, F.; Pacelli, A.; Fendler, W.; Koplin, S. Improved production of ⁶⁸Ga-Pentixafor using cartridge mediated cation exchange purification. *Appl. Radiat. Isot.*, **2022**, *189*, 110447.

[69] Hörmann, A.A.; Plhak, E.; Klingler, M.; Rangger, C.; Pfister, J.; Schwach, G.; Kvaternik, H.; von Guggenberg, E. Automated Synthesis of ⁶⁸Ga-Labeled DOTA-MGS8 and preclinical characterization of cholecystokinin-2 receptor targeting. *Molecules*, **2022**, *27*(6), 2034.

[70] Plhak, E.; Pichler, C.; Dittmann-Schnabel, B.; Gößnitzer, E.; Aigner, R.M.; Stanzel, S.; Kvaternik, H. Automated synthesis of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 on a Scintomics GRP Synthesizer. *Pharmaceuticals*, **2023**, *16*(8), 1138.

[71] Price, E.W.; Orvig, C. Matching chelators to radiometals for radiopharmaceuticals. *Chem. Soc. Rev.*, **2014**, *43*(1), 260-290.

[72] Martin, R.; Weidlich, S.; Zerges, A-M.; Gameiro, C.; Lazarova, N.; Müllera, M. Fully automated synthesis of 68Ga-labelled peptides using the IBA Synthera® and Synthera® Extension modules. *18th ESRR- European Symposium on Radiopharmacy and Radiopharmaceuticals Conference*, Salzburg, Austria, 2016, pp. 7-10.

[73] Søborg Pedersen, K.; Baun, C.; Michaelsen Nielsen, K.; Thisgaard, H.; Ingemann Jensen, A.; Zhuravlev, F. Design, synthesis, computational, and preclinical evaluation of nafTi/⁴⁵Ti-labeled urea-based glutamate PSMA ligand. *Molecules*, **2020**, *25*(5), 1104.

[74] Uğur, A.; Elçi, Ş.G.; Yüksel, D. Validation of HPLC method for the determination of chemical and radiochemical purity of a ⁶⁸Ga-labeled EuK-Sub-kf-(3-iodo-y-) DOTAGA. *Turk. J. Chem.*, **2021**, *45*(1), 26-34.

[75] Zhao, R.; Ploessl, K.; Zha, Z.; Choi, S.; Alexoff, D.; Zhu, L.; Kung, H.F. Synthesis and evaluation of ⁶⁸Ga- and ¹⁷⁷Lu-Labeled (*R*)-vs (*S*)-DOTAGA prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeting derivatives. *Mol. Pharm.*, **2020**, *17*(12), 4589-4602.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00777 PMID: 33108189

[76] Green, M.A.; Hutchins, G.D.; Bahler, C.D.; Tann, M.; Mathias, C.J.; Territo, W.; Sims, J.; Polson, H.; Alexoff, D.; Eckelman, W.C.; Kung, H.F.; Fletcher, J.W. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 as a PSMA-targeted pet radiopharmaceutical for detection of cancer: Initial evaluation and comparison with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in prostate cancer patients presenting with biochemical recurrence. *Mol. Imaging. Biol.*, **2020**, *22*(3), 752-763.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-019-01421-7 PMID: 31429050

[77] Lee, H.; Scheuermann, J.S.; Young, A.J.; Doot, R.K.; Daube-Witherspoon, M.E.; Schubert, E.K.; Fillare, M.A.; Alexoff, D.; Karp, J.S.; Kung, H.F.; Pryma, D.A. Preliminary Evaluation of ⁶⁸Ga-P16-093, a PET radiotracer targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer. *Mol. Imaging Biol.*, **2022**, *24*(5), 710-720.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-022-01720-6 PMID: 35349040

[78] Wang, G.; Li, L.; Wang, J.; Zang, J.; Chen, J.; Xiao, Y.; Fan, X.; Zhu, L.; Kung, H.F.; Zhu, Z. Head-to-head comparison of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 and 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A pilot study. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging*, **2023**, *50*(5), 1499-1509.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-06101-3 PMID: 36600099

[79] Wang, G.; Li, L.; Zang, J.; Hong, H.; Zhu, L.; Kung, H.F.; Zhu, Z. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-P16-093 and 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT in patients with primary prostate cancer. *Clin. Nucl. Med.*, **2023**, *48*(4), 289-295.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000004566 PMID: 36727866

[80] Wang, G.; Li, L.; Zhu, M.; Zang, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, R.; Yan, W.; Zhu, L.; Kung, H.F.; Zhu, Z. A prospective head-to-head comparison of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with primary prostate cancer. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging*, **2023**, *50*(10), 3126-3136.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06283-4 PMID: 37233785

[81] Duan, X.; Cao, Z.; Zhu, H.; Liu, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Ren, Y.; Liu, F.; Cai, X.; Guo, X.; Xi, Z.; Pomper, M.G.; Yang, Z.; Fan, Y.; Yang, X. ⁶⁸Ga-labeled ODAP-Urea-based PSMA agents in prostate cancer: First-in-human imaging of an optimized agent. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging*, **2022**, *49*(3), 1030-1040.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05486-x PMID: 34453203

[82] Han, T.; Quan, Z.; Wang, M.; Meng, X.; Zhang, M.; Ye, J.; Li, G.; Wang, J.; Kang, F. Head-to-head comparison of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 with ⁶⁸Ga-P137 in patients with suspected prostate cancer. *Mol. Pharm.*, **2023**, *20*(11), 5646-5654.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00522

[83] Heo, Y.A. Flotufolastat F 18: Diagnostic first approval. *Mol. Diagn. Ther.*, **2023**, *27*(5), 631-636.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40291-023-00665-y PMID: 37439946

[84] Wurzer, A.; Di Carlo, D.; Schmidt, A.; Beck, R.; Eiber, M.; Schwaiger, M.; Wester, H.J. Radiohybrid ligands: A novel tracer concept exemplified by ¹⁸F- or ⁶⁸Ga-labeled rhPSMA inhibitors. *J. Nucl. Med.*, **2020**, *61*(5), 735-742.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.234922 PMID: 31862804