# The Arabidopsis thaliana-Alternaria brassicicola pathosystem: A model interaction for investigating seed transmission of necrotrophic fungi

Stéphanie Pochon, Emmanuel Terrasson, Thomas Guillemette, Beatrice

Iacomi-Vasilescu, Sonia Georgeault, Marjorie Juchaux, Romain Berruyer,

Isabelle Debeaujon, Philippe Simoneau, Claire Campion

► To cite this version:

Stéphanie Pochon, Emmanuel Terrasson, Thomas Guillemette, Beatrice Iacomi-Vasilescu, Sonia Georgeault, et al.. The Arabidopsis thaliana-Alternaria brassicicola pathosystem: A model interaction for investigating seed transmission of necrotrophic fungi. Plant Methods, 2012, 8, 10.1186/1746-4811-8-16. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-8-16](https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-8-16). [hal-01190780](https:// HAL Id: hal-01190780)

Submitted on 29 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# The *Arabidopsis thaliana*-Alternaria brassicicola pathosystem: A model interaction for investigating seed transmission of necrotrophic fungi

Stephanie Pochon<sup>1,2,3</sup>, Emmanuel Terrasson<sup>1,2,3</sup>, Thomas Guillemette<sup>1,2,3</sup>, Beatrice Iacomi-Vasilescu<sup>4</sup>, Sonia Georgeault<sup>5</sup>, Marjorie Juchaux<sup>6</sup>, Romain Berruyer<sup>1,2,3</sup>, Isabelle Debeaujon<sup>7</sup>, Philippe Simoneau<sup>1,2,3*</sup> and Claire Campion<sup>1,2,3</sup>

**Abstract**

**Background:** Seed transmission constitutes a major component of the parasitic cycle for several fungal pathogens. However, very little is known concerning fungal or plant genetic factors that impact seed transmission and mechanisms underlying this key biological trait have yet to be clarified. Such lack of available data could be probably explained by the absence of suitable model pathosystem to study plant-fungus interactions during the plant reproductive phase.

**Results:** Here we report on setting up a new pathosystem that could facilitate the study of fungal seed transmission. Reproductive organs of *Arabidopsis thaliana* were inoculated with *Alternaria brassicicola* conidia. Parameters (floral vs fruit route, seed collection date, plant and silique developmental stages) that could influence the seed transmission efficiency were tested to define optimal seed infection conditions. Microscopic observations revealed that the fungus penetrates siliques through cellular junctions, replum and stomata, and into seed coats either directly or through cracks. The ability of the osmosensitive fungal mutant nik1Δ3 to transmit to *A. thaliana* seeds was analyzed. A significant decrease in seed transmission rate was observed compared to the wild-type parental strain, confirming that a functional osmoregulation pathway is required for efficient seed transmission of the fungus. Similarly, to test the role of flavonoids in seed coat protection against pathogens, a *transparent testa* *Arabidopsis* mutant (*tt4-1*) not producing any flavonoid was used as host plant. Unexpectedly, *tt4-1* seeds were infected to a significantly lower extent than wild-type seeds, possibly due to over-accumulation of other antimicrobial metabolites.

**Conclusions:** The *Arabidopsis thaliana*-Alternaria brassicicola pathosystem, that have been widely used to study plant-pathogen interactions during the vegetative phase, also proved to constitute a suitable model pathosystem for detailed analysis of plant-pathogen interactions during the reproductive phase. We demonstrated that it provides an excellent system for investigating the impact of different fungal or plant mutations on the seed transmission process and therefore paves the way towards future high-throughput screening of both *Arabidopsis* and fungal mutant.

**Keywords:** Seed transmission, *Alternaria brassicicola*, *Arabidopsis thaliana*, Seed colonization, *Transparent testa*, Osmotic stress

<footnote>* Correspondence: simoneau@univ-angers.fr
¹Université d'Angers, UMR 1345 IRHS, SFR QUASAV, 2 Bd Lavoisier, Angers cedex, F-49045, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²INRA, UMR 1345 IRHS, 16 Bd Lavoisier, Angers cedex, F-49045, France
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article</footnote>
**Background**

Transmission from infected to healthy hosts is a key
component of pathogen fitness, as pathogens strongly
depend on this process for their long-term survival [1].
For several plant-parasite interactions, transmission is
strictly “horizontal” with a pathogen spreading between
related and unrelated individuals through mechanisms
ranging from direct contact to wind-dispersal. In other
systems, transmission may also be “vertical”, that is to
say the pathogen infects the host’s offspring [2]. Al-
though many pathogens spread by a combination of
horizontal and vertical transmission, these two transmis-
sion modes require specific adaptations of the pathogen
that can be mutually exclusive, resulting in a trade-off
between horizontal and vertical transmission [1]. While
an inverse relation between aggressiveness and vertical
transmission has been shown for some pathogens [3],
the ability to transmit by seed may have significant
advantages for pathogens, such as long-term survival,
maximum opportunity for progeny infection and long
distance dissemination [4,5].

From an epidemiological standpoint, seed transmission
represents a possible mode of primary infection from
which dangerous polycyclic microorganisms can start
epidemic attacks. The early presence of a small quantity
of infected plants (i.e. 0.05% of a crop) is sometimes suf-
ficient for the development of destructive attacks [6].
The use of seeds infected with pathogenic fungi thus
represents a major economic threat and prevention of
plant infection by seedborne pathogens in seed crops is
essential. Although the chain of events leading to seed
transfer through the plant has been extensively docu-
mented [4], almost nothing is currently known concern-
ing the factors that mediate seed transmission by fungal
pathogens. Iacomi-Vasilescu et al. [7] recently reported
that *Alternaria brassicicola* strains deficient in a group
III osmosensor histidine kinase were highly jeopardized
in their ability to infect radish seeds. This was inter-
preted as a consequence of their failure to overcome se-
vere osmotic stress conditions consecutive to the gradual
decrease in the water potential in maturing seeds. Be-
sides this pioneer study, no other data are available for
fungal pathogenic factors that impact seed transmission.
This could be probably explained by the difficulty to
carry out such experiments under field conditions, par-
ticularly due to the reduced number of reproduction
cycles per year and the lack of available model pathosys-
tem to study plant-fungus interactions during the plant
reproductive phase.

*Arabidopsis thaliana* has become an important model
host for studying plant-pathogen interactions during the
vegetative phase due to the development of numerous gen-
etic and genomic tools. However, to our knowledge, this
plant species has never been used as host to explore plant-

pathogen interactions during the reproductive phase al-
though it has several attributes such as small size and rapid
life cycle, which make it well suited for this kind of study
under carefully controlled environmental conditions.
Among the numerous *Arabidopsis* – pathogen systems that
have been developed to investigate the molecular mechan-
isms of virulence and plant resistance [8], the interaction of
*Arabidopsis* with *Alternaria brassicicola* has been exten-
sively used as a model for diseases caused by fungal necro-
trophs [9]. *Alternaria brassicicola* causes dark spot disease,
one of the most common and destructive fungal diseases of
*Brassicaceae* worldwide. This fungus can be seedborne via
mycelium within the seed and is the dominating *Alternaria*
spp. in *Brassica* seed crops and may be responsible for im-
portant yield losses [10-13]. In such crops, a vertical disease
gradient can be observed on fruits, with the lowest siliques
becoming infected first and infection spreading slowly up-
wards [14]. Concerning seeds, hilum was described to be
the more contaminated seed area, as a consequence of my-
celial growth through the suture of siliques and the funicle
[15,16]. To a lesser extent, *A. brassicicola* can infect seeds
in an internal manner. In this instance, the pathogen is
mainly found in seed coats. Both external and internal in-
oculum can survive for several years but the longevity of in-
ternal inoculum is higher than that of external inoculum
[10].

The main objective of the present study was to de-
velop, in controlled conditions, a model pathosystem
suitable for detailed analysis of the molecular mechan-
isms underlying the seed transmission stage in both the
host plant and the fungal pathogen. Reproductive organs
of *A. thaliana* Landsberg erecta (Ler), an ecotype suscep-
tible to *A. brassicicola*, were thus inoculated with fungal
conidia, and transmission levels of this pathogen to seeds
were evaluated. The influence of different parameters on
the seed transmission “probability” was established in
order to design a robust and easy to handle protocol.
This model pathosystem was then used to confirm that
an *A. brassicicola* strain deficient in the osmosensing his-
tidine kinase AbNIK1 was impaired in its capacity to effi-
ciently colonize seeds. In addition, transmission of *A.
brassicicola* to seeds of an *A. thaliana transparent testa
4* (*tt4-1*) mutant deficient with respect to flavonoid syn-
thesis was also analyzed.

**Results**

Seed transmission route and influence of the seed
collection date on seed transmission

As seed infection through the vascular supply has been
described for wilt pathogens [17], only floral and fruit
routes of seed infection were explored with *Alternaria
brassicicola*. The floral infection route for seed transmis-
sion was studied in plants at the bolting stage by inocu-
lating floral buds with an *A. brassicicola* (Abra43, WT)
conidial suspension adjusted to either 1 x 10⁴ or 1 x 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹. For inoculations, 5 µl drops of an *A. brassicicola* conidial suspension were deposited on intact host tissue. Six days after inoculation, necrotic lesions were observed on flower buds and 8 days later, flower buds were covered with mycelium and conidia, irrespective of the inoculum charge. As a consequence, flower formation was impeded (data not shown).

For examination of the fruit route for seed transmission, plants with 10 siliques on the main flowering stem, were inoculated by application of two distinct 2.5 µL drops of an *A. brassicicola* (Abra43) conidial suspension adjusted to 1 x 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹ on the outer surface of the 10 oldest siliques (one drop at the base of silique and one in the middle). Inoculations resulted in mycelium development, conidia formation and the appearance of necrotic lesions typical of black spot on siliques within a few days after inoculation (Figure 1a, 1b and 1c). Inoculated siliques were collected 10 or 20 days after inoculation, and seeds were individually harvested. Seeds showed mycelium development and conidia formation (Figure 1d). They were separately plated on PDA medium, to estimate the seed contamination level. Transmission of *A. brassicicola* to seeds was similar (32% of contaminated seeds) at the two collection dates (Figure 2). Siliques and seeds were thus harvested 10 days after inoculation for further experiments, since longer

incubation did not induce a higher contamination level. Seeds harvested in control plants that were integrated to all experiments, and whose siliques were treated with two 2.5 µL drops of a 0.01% Tween 20 solution, never showed any *A. brassicicola* development.

## Influence of the plant and silique developmental stage on seed transmission

The influence of the plant developmental stage on the incidence of *A. brassicicola* on seeds was examined by inoculating all siliques of plants with either 10 or 20 siliques on the main flowering stem. For inoculations, two distinct 2.5 µL drops of a conidial suspension adjusted to 1 x 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹ were applied. The results indicated that the contamination level per plant was significantly higher (35%) when siliques were inoculated at the 10-silique stage rather than later at the 20-silique stage (8%) (Figure 3). Further experiments were thus conducted by inoculating plants at the 10-silique stage.

The impact of the silique developmental stage on *A. brassicicola* seed transmission was assessed through the inoculation of 10 siliques numbered from 1 (the oldest silique, at the base of the bolting stem) to 10 (the youngest silique) (Figure 4a), and the seeds were identified according to their corresponding silique. The global probability of seed infection by *A. brassicicola* was similar to previous

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1** Mycelium development, conidia formation on siliques and seeds, and necrotic lesions on siliques 10 days after inoculation with *Alternaria brassicicola*. (a) and (b), mycelium development and conidia formation (arrows) on siliques. (c), necrotic lesions (arrowhead) on siliques. (d), mycelium development and conidia formation (arrow) on seeds. Bar = 1 mm.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2** Influence of incubation duration on transmission capacity of *Alternaria brassicicola* (Abra43) to seeds of *Arabidopsis thaliana* plants (Ler ecotype). Harvesting was done 10 days and 20 days after inoculation (dai). Values represent means with IC<sub>95</sub>.</figcaption></figure>

results (32%, data not shown), but the seed infection prob-
ability differed depending on the silique: 74% for seeds
from the oldest silique at the base of the bolting stem (n°
1), only 7% for seeds from a younger silique near the apical
meristem (n°10) (Figure 4b). The incidence on seeds was
thus significantly different according to the silique devel-
opmental stage. As the *A. brassicicola* incidence on seeds
of the youngest siliques was very low, in further experi-
ments, evaluation of *A. brassicicola* seed transmission cap-
acity took only the results concerning the five oldest
siliques (n°1 to n°5) into account.

Microscopic assessment of seed and silique colonization
by *A. brassicicola*

Siliques and seeds harvested 10 days after inoculation of siliques with an *A. brassicicola* conidial suspension adjusted to 1 x 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹ were assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy. These studies focused on the histopathology of infected seeds and siliques, while observing the extent and amount of mycelium and conidia.

SEM observations of seeds provided evidence of *A. brassicicola* mycelium superficial growth and conidia formation on seeds harvested 10 days after inoculation (Figure 5a and 5b). Penetration of hyphae into seed coat tissues, directly (Figure 5c) or through cracks in the seed coat, was observed by SEM. Penetration and fungal development within the seed tissues were also revealed by staining hyphae with solophenyl flavin and observing the tissues under a confocal laser scanning microscope

(Figure 5d). These findings indicated that the fungus ac-
tively colonized the seed coat and was not only a passive
contaminant of the seed surface. After fungal colonization,
infected seeds frequently showed alteration of the seed
coat appearance (Figure 5e) by comparison with seeds har-
vested on control plants (Figure 5f): infected seeds seemed
shrivelled as if embryo aborted early during development.

On the outer surface of siliques, mycelium was found
to be growing in many directions from germinated co-
nidia in the inoculation zone (Figure 6a and 6b). Hyphae
penetrated into the fruit occasionally via stomata present
on the outer surface of siliques (Figure 6c) or, more often
directly, in particular at the cellular junctions (Figure 6d).
Stomata also allowed mycelium reemergence (Figure 6e).
Conidia formation was evident on the outer surface of
siliques (Figure 6f). Intense mycelium development and
conidia formation were also visible on the inner surface
of siliques (Figure 6g). Replum seemed to be a preferen-
tial zone for penetration into siliques (Figure 6h). The si-
lique results indicated that the fungal pathogen spread
into the seed from the fruit.

Influence of fungal and host genotypes on seed
transmission

In order to confirm that the above-described model patho-
system is a useful tool for analyzing the molecular factors
involved in the seed transmission process, the seed trans-
mission capacity of an osmosensitive fungal mutant nik1Δ3
[18] and its wild-type parental strain (Abra43) were assessed
on an *A. thaliana* Ler ecotype. This was performed as
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3** Influence of plant developmental stage on transmission capacity of *Alternaria brassicicola* (Abra43) to seeds of *Arabidopsis thaliana* plants (Ler ecotype). Siliques were inoculated when 10 or 20 siliques were present on the main flowering stem. Harvesting was done 10 days after inoculation. Values represent means with IC<sub>95</sub>.</figcaption></figure>

described above by inoculating the five oldest siliques on plants on which 10 siliques were present on the main flowering stem, and individually harvesting seeds 10 days after inoculation. Parallel leaf inoculation experiments were conducted to ensure that the *nik1Δ3* mutant strain was still virulent on *A. thaliana* vegetative organs (Additional file 1).

In comparison to the wild-type strain Abra43, the *nik1Δ3* mutant strain, defective in *AbNIK1*, encoding a group III osmosensor histidine kinase, was significantly affected with respect to the transmission capacity to *Ler* ecotype seeds (Figure 7). Indeed, infection probability was 40% after inoculation with Abra43, and 12% after inoculation with the *nik1Δ3* mutant strain (Figure 7a). This difference was statistically significant overall (p < 2 × 10<sup>-16</sup>), and for each silique (p ≤ 1.14 × 10<sup>-8</sup>) (Figure 7b). The gradient of fungal incidence from the oldest silique (n°1) to the youngest inoculated one (n°5) observed after inoculation with Abra43 was also noted for the *nik1Δ3* mutant strain.

Seed transmission efficiencies of *A. brassicicola* (Abra43) on two *A. thaliana* genotypes, the *Ler* ecotype and the *tt4-1* mutant, inactivated in flavonoid biosynthesis, were also compared. Unexpectedly, the infection probability of *A. brassicicola* to *tt4-1* seeds was significantly lower (15%) than to seeds of the parental wild-type *Ler* ecotype (27%) (Figure 8a). The difference in the infection probability was significant overall (p < 2 × 10<sup>-16</sup>), and for each inoculated silique (p ≤ 12 × 10<sup>-4</sup>) (Figure 8b). Parallel leaf inoculation assays did not reveal any obvious difference in the capacity of *A. brassicicola* to develop symptoms on vegetative

organs from either *A. thaliana* genotypes (Additional file 1).

## Discussion

The main purpose of this study was to set up a new pathosystem that could be used to analyze molecular factors that mediate the transmission of fungal pathogens to seeds. *Arabidopsis thaliana* reproductive organs were inoculated with the seedborne pathogen *A. brassicicola*. Some general conclusions can be drawn from the findings of experiments designed to define the optimal conditions for studying fungal transmission to seeds of *A. thaliana*. First, concerning the seed transmission routes, our results did not reveal whether *A. brassicicola* was able to cause seed infection via flowers, since floral development was interrupted due to inoculation with a virulent isolate. Oliver et al. [2] demonstrated, via glasshouse inoculation trials and examination of naturally infected *Cakile* seeds, that seed infection could occur through the flowers, though less efficiently than the fruit route. Indeed, the floral route seems to be more specific to opportunistic pathogenic strains of *Alternaria alternata*, with this phenomenon being explained by the weakness of flower defence mechanisms. By contrast, we found that the fruit route was efficient and the seed contamination levels (30%) thus observed in *A. thaliana* under our experimental conditions were comparable to those obtained by Oliver et al. [2] for *Cakile maritima* seeds in field and laboratory conditions, with the frequency of infection positively correlated with the lesion density on the fruit surface.
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4** Influence of silique stage on transmission capacity of *Alternaria brassicicola* (Abra43) to seeds of *Arabidopsis thaliana* plants (Ler ecotype). (a) Representation of the silique nomenclature. (b) Seed transmission level according to silique stage. Harvesting was done 10 days after inoculation. Values represent means with IC95.</figcaption></figure>

Our results also confirmed data obtained on *Brassica* seed crops in field conditions, indicating a vertical disease gradient on fruits, with the infection first affecting the lowest siliques and then spreading slowly upwards [14]. This was explained by the observation that conidia are often disseminated short distances and retained within the canopy. As in our laboratory conditions, inoculum was distributed equally on all siliques, the more efficient transmission to seeds from the lower siliques could be mainly due to silique maturity differences, as *Alternaria* development is favored on senescent tissues [19].

The mode of seed infection by *A. brassicicola* and its localization on the reproductive organ tissues was already described several years ago [15]. We used our model pathosystem to perform a microscopic analysis of contaminated seeds, but also of contaminated siliques. Concerning seeds, surface colonization via conidia and hyphae was observed and resulted in desquamation of the seed surface, in accordance with previously published data [15]. Such intensive fungal development could be favored by the release of carbohydrates at the surface of damaged seeds as proposed by Knox-Davies [15]. Conidiogenesis has frequently been observed on contaminated seeds, with spores preferentially located in seed coat folds and cracks, which may provide protection against harsh environments [20]. Superficial hyphae also penetrated within the seed, as confirmed by SEM and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Our observations did not allow us to determine if *A. brassicicola* was

limited to the seed coat or also present inside the endosperm and embryo. However, according to Singh & Mathur [17], whereas biotrophic fungi are often located in the embryo, necrotrophic fungi like *A. brassicicola* are generally located on seed and fruit coats, and deeper penetration is uncommon. In line with this, *A. brassicicola* was found to be confined to the testa of naturally infected Brussels sprout seeds while being mainly on the surface cabbage seeds [15]. The extent of testa colonization could not be accurately determined and would require transmission electronic microscopy analysis of ultra-thin seed cuts or confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of seed cuts. Nevertheless, hyphal penetration of *A. thaliana* seed coats was evidently accompanied by seed surface damage. This phenomenon could be due to the production of plant tissue degradation enzymes, for example cutinases, as already described for *A. brassicicola*, and it could potentially accompany the penetration of cabbage tissues [21,22]. The same hypothesis was put forward by Vaughan et al. [23] with respect to soybean seed colonization by several *Alternaria* sp.. To our knowledge, no detailed microscopic analysis has ever been reported concerning silique colonization. A few days before seed harvest, typical black-spot symptoms developed on fruits at inoculation sites where intensive development of the fungus was observed on the outer surface of siliques. Penetration inside the fruit was either via stomata, intercellular spaces or replum, with occasional differentiation of appressoria-like structures.
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5** *A. brassicicola* localization on *A. thaliana* seeds. Scanning electron microscopy a, b, c, e and f) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (d) images of *Arabidopsis thaliana* seeds (Ler ecotype) 10 days after inoculation with *Alternaria brassicicola* (Abra43). (a) Global colonization of a seed by *A. brassicicola*. (b) conidia formation on a seed. (c) direct hyphal penetration into the seed coat (white arrow). (d) mycelium development on a seed. Hyphae were stained with solophenyl flavin, and seed coat with propidium iodide. Hyphae grew on the seed surface, then penetrated into the seed coat (white arrows): hyphal brightness was lower when hyphae were growing within the seed coat. (e) and (f), alteration of the seed surface after fungal colonization: seed seemed shrivelled (e) by comparison with a seed harvested on a control plant (f).</figcaption></figure>

The model pathosystem thus defined was then used to
specify the molecular factors impacting the seed
colonization process by using mutant genotypes of the
pathogen and host plant. In maturing seeds, the water con-
tent dramatically decreases, leading to a reduction in the
metabolism necessary for seed conservation. During seed
colonization, fungi could thus be exposed to severe water
and osmotic stresses that they have to overcome to be effi-
ciently transmitted to seeds and complete their infection

cycle. Then the ability to cope with water and osmotic
stress could be a factor that determines their transmission
to seeds. *Arabidopsis thaliana* silique inoculation in con-
trolled conditions allowed us to repeatedly show a lower
seed transmission capacity for nik1Δ3, a disruption mutant
deficient in a group III histidine kinase involved in the os-
motic stress response [18], by comparison with its wild-type
parental strain Abra43. The contamination level was signifi-
cantly lower at every silique stage, with a gradient from the
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

**Figure 6** *A. brassicicola* localization on *A. thaliana* siliques. Scanning electron microscopy images of *Arabidopsis thaliana* (Ler ecotype) siliques 10 days after inoculation with *Alternaria brassicicola* (Abra43). (a), mycelium development on the outer surface of a silique in many directions from the inoculation point. (b), conidia germination (white arrow) on the outer surface of a silique. (c), hyphal penetration into silique tissues via a stomatum (St). (d), direct hyphal penetration into silique tissues at cellular junctions (white arrowhead). (e), hyphal reemergence from silique tissues via a stomatum (St). (f), conidia formation (double white arrowheads) on the outer surface of a silique. (g), mycelium development and conidia formation (double white arrowheads) on the inner surface of a silique. (h), abundant fungal colonization of the replum.
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7** Influence of *A. brassicicola* genotypes on seed transmission capacity. Transmission capacity of two *Alternaria brassicicola* genotypes, Abra43 and nik1Δ3, to *Arabidopsis thaliana* seeds (Ler ecotype). (a), global seed transmission capacity. (b), seed transmission capacity according to the silique stage. Hatched bars: Abra43, white bars: nik1Δ3. Harvesting was done 10 days after inoculation. Values represent means with IC<sub>95</sub>.</figcaption></figure>

oldest to the youngest silique, as observed after Abra43 in-
oculation. This confirms previous findings indicating that
*A. brassicicola* null mutants in the *AbNIK1* gene, although
their virulence on host vegetative tissues remained intact,
were affected in their transmission to radish seeds after arti-
ficial inoculation in field conditions [7].

Using our model pathosystem, we took advantage of
the availability of *A. thaliana transparent testa (tt)*
mutants, to assess the influence of flavonoids present in
seed testa on their susceptibility to fungal infection. The
selected mutant line *tt4* is altered in the chalcone syn-
thase gene [24] and therefore disrupted in the first step
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8** Influence of *A. thaliana* genotypes on seed transmission capacity. Transmission capacity of *Alternaria brassicicola* (Abra43) to seeds of two *Arabidopsis thaliana* genotypes: *Ler* ecotype and *tt4-1* mutant. (a), global seed transmission capacity. (b), seed transmission capacity according to silique stage. Hatched bars: *Ler* ecotype, white bars: *tt4-1* mutant. Harvesting was done 10 days after inoculation. Values represent means with IC95.</figcaption></figure>

of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway. It produces pale
yellow seeds and does not produce any of the flavonoid
compounds present in WT seeds, i.e. proanthocyanidins
and flavonols [25]. Based on the well-documented plant
protection functions of flavonoids against abiotic and

biotic stresses [26], and previously published data show-
ing that peas with dark seed coats were less susceptible
to fungal infections than those with light-colored coats
[27], we anticipated that *A. brassicicola* would colonize
seeds of the *tt4-1* allele more efficiently than the wild
type. Unexpectedly, although a downward vertical gradient of seed infection was still observed for both wild-type and mutant genotypes, significantly lower *A. brassicicola* infection probabilities were obtained with the flavonoid deficient mutant. A recent metabolomic study characterized several compounds over-accumulating in seeds of *tt4-1* plants compared to those of wild-type *Ler*, as phenolic choline esters, sinapate-derived metabolites and glucosinolate breakdown products [28]. Although the antimicrobial properties of the former compounds have yet to be characterized, glucosinolate derivatives have been well documented as potentially toxic for pathogens, including *A. brassicicola* [29], and such metabolomic changes in *tt4-1* seeds might explain our observations. These hypotheses can be tested by investigating the transmission behaviour of *Arabidopsis* mutants disrupted in sinapate and glucosinolate metabolisms. Complementary investigations using different *tt* mutants and different *tt4* alleles are required to reliably conclude on the role of flavonoids in the seed transmission process of *A. brassicicola* to *A. thaliana*.

## Conclusions

We have established a reliable *Arabidopsis*-based pathosystem allowing investigations of fungal transmission to seeds. The results obtained by comparing the seed transmission ability of two fungal genotypes (wild-type vs. *nik1Δ3*) on the *Ler* ecotype and of the wild-type isolate Abra43 on two plant genotypes (*Ler* vs. *tt4-1*) confirmed that the described assay was suitable for assessing the impact of different fungal or plant mutations on the seed transmission process. This new pathosystem therefore paves the way towards future studies involving other fungal genotypes, e.g. hypersensitive to osmotic and/or water stresses, and other plant genotypes, e.g. mutants producing abnormal seed coats. Moreover, fungus-infected seeds can now be reproducibly obtained and used as starting material to study the ability of the pathogen to survive in seeds during storage and to transmit from seeds to seedlings.

## Methods

### Fungal strains and growth conditions

The *A. brassicicola* strains Abra43 (wild-type) and *nik1Δ3* (mutant inactivated in the *AbNIK1* gene) used in this study have previously been described [18,29]. For routine culture, Abra43 and *nik1Δ3* were grown and maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and PDA supplemented with 12 µg/ mL hygromycin B, respectively.

### *Arabidopsis thaliana* genotypes and growth conditions

The capacity of *Alternaria brassicicola* to transmit to seeds was studied in plants obtained by sowing seeds of *Arabidopsis thaliana* individually in pots (7 x 7 x

7 cm) containing prewetted compost (NEUHAUS HUMINSUBSTRAT *N4*®, NFU 44–551). The Landsberg *erecta* (*Ler*) ecotype and its *tt4-1* mutant allele (NASC reference N85), inactivated in the chalcone synthase gene and totally defective in flavonoids [24,30], were used. The plants were grown in a controlled climatic room with day/night temperatures of 22°C/19°C and a 16 h photoperiod. ARACON base and tube (ARASYSTEM, BETATECH bvba, Gent, Belgium) were placed as soon as the floral stem appeared.

### Infection assays and seed contamination assessment

The floral infection route for seed transmission was tested by inoculating *A. thaliana* floral buds with 5 µL drops of an *A. brassicicola* conidial suspension. Two parallel experiments were performed with conidial suspension adjusted to either 1 x 10⁴ or 1 x 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹. The plants were maintained under saturating humidity for 2 days in the dark and were monitored 6 and 14 days after inoculation.

Most of the seed transmission assays used 1-month-old *A. thaliana* plants with 10 (or 20 for determination of the influence of the plant developmental stage on seed transmission) siliques. The position of a silique at a precise stage of development is determined by the number of flowers produced per inflorescence per day, which is in general three or four. Two 2,5 µL drops of an *A. brassicicola* conidial suspension (1 x 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹ in water) supplemented with 0,01% (v/v) Tween 20 were placed on the 10 (or 20 for determination of the influence of the plant developmental stage on seed transmission) youngest siliques (one drop at the silique base and one in the middle). The oldest silique (at the base of the bolting stem) was numbered 1 and the youngest 10 (or 20 for determination of the influence of the plant developmental stage on seed transmission). At least three plants per fungal or plant genotype were inoculated and the experiment was repeated twice. As a control for all experiments, two 2,5 µL drops of a 0,01% (v/v) Tween 20 solution were placed on 10 siliques of one plant. The plants were then maintained under saturating humidity for 2 days in the dark.

Contaminated siliques were harvested 10 days after inoculation (or 20 days after inoculation for determination of the influence of the harvest date on seed transmission). Inoculated or control siliques were dissected with sterile forceps and seeds were carefully harvested to avoid contact with the fungus potentially present on the outer surface of siliques. Seeds were incubated separately on PDA medium for 2 days. A seed was considered to be contaminated when incubation resulted in typical colony development. As the first results showed that contamination levels were
very low for siliques n°6 to n°10, only results for siliques n°1 to n°5 were taken into account for further experiments.

## Statistical analysis

Because of their dichotomous nature (i.e. each seed is either contaminated or not), seed contamination data were analyzed using logistic (logit) generalized linear models (for an introduction, see [31]). Statistical analyses were performed with the R software package (version 2.12.0, [32]), using the `glm` function with “family” set to “binomial” (link = “logit”)). `IC<sub>95</sub>` (95% confidence interval) values were extracted from such models. For ease of reading, log odd values predicted by the models were converted to infection probabilities, thus resulting in slightly asymmetric `IC<sub>95</sub>`. Repetitions were treated as a factor, and were found not to have a significant effect.

## Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM)

For SEM observations, specimens (siliques valves and seeds harvested 10 days after inoculation) were fixed under vacuum in 4% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 4 h at 4°C and stored overnight at 4°C in the same fixative buffer. Specimens were rinsed once in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) and post-fixed in 2% (w/v) osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) in the dark for 2 h. Samples were rinsed three times with distilled water, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (50, 70, 95 and 100% for 10 min each). The last 100% ethanol bath was repeated three times. The dehydration process was completed by treating samples in ethanol/acetone (1:1, v/v) for 15 min and then twice in acetone for 15 min. Specimens were dried by the critical-point method. Silique walls and seeds were then sputter-coated with a thin carbon layer and examined using a JSM 6301-F (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) scanning electron microscope operating at 3 kV.

## Confocal laser scanning microscopy

For confocal laser scanning microscopy observations, seeds harvested 10 days after inoculation were observed after double staining: seed cell walls were stained with propidium iodide [33] and fungal cell walls, with solophenyl flavin [34].

Seeds were immersed for 2 min in a 1% (w/v) propidium iodide solution and rinsed twice in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2). Then the seeds were incubated in a 0.1% (w/v) solophenyl flavin solution for 5 min and rinsed twice in ultrapure water, and then stored in 50% (v/v) glycerol at 4°C until analysis under a Nikon (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY) A1S1 confocal laser microscope equipped with argon-ion (488 nm) and diode (561 nm) lasers. Solophenyl flavin staining was detected with the emission light set at 520 nm, and propidium

iodide staining with the emission light set at 617 nm. Several images were overlapped to obtain a tridimensional picture.

## Additional file

Additional file 1: Effects of the disruption of AbNIK1 on the virulence of *A. brassicicola* on *A. thaliana* and of the *tt4* mutation on the susceptibility of *A. thaliana* to *A. brassicicola*. Leaves of *A. thaliana* *Ler* ecotype or its *tt4* mutant were inoculated with conidia suspensions of Abra43 and nik1Δ3 strains. For each plant-pathogen combination, five leaves are shown that correspond to representative symptoms obtained at 6 dpi.

## Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

## Authors' contributions

SP developed the seed transmission pathosystem, performed the experimental work and wrote a draft of the manuscript. ET prepared most of the plant samples for microscopy. BI carried out initial experiments aimed at studying the seed transmission routes. TG and IB supervised experiments involving *A. brassicicola* and *A. thaliana* mutants, respectively. SG and MJ provided technical assistance with scanning electronic and confocal laser scanning microscopy, respectively. RB performed the statistical analyses. PS and CC designed and coordinated the project and wrote the manuscript. All authors performed a critical reading and approved the final version of the manuscript.

## Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the French Région Pays de la Loire (QUALISEM research program). We are grateful to Sylvain Hanteville and Bruno Hamon for technical assistance. We thank David Manley for editing the manuscript.

## Author details

¹Université d'Angers, UMR 1345 IRHS, SFR QUASAV, 2 Bd Lavoisier, Angers cedex, F-49045 France. ²INRA, UMR 1345 IRHS, 16 Bd Lavoisier, Angers cedex, F-49045, France. ³Agrocampus-Ouest, UMR 1345 IRHS, 2 Bd Lavoisier, Angers cedex, F-49045, France. ⁴USAMV, 59 Bd Marasti, Bucharest, Ro-71331, Romania. ⁵Université d'Angers, SCIAM, IBS, 4 rue Larrey, Angers cedex, F-49933, France. ⁶Université d'Angers, SFR QUASAV, IMAC, rue Georges Morel, Beaucouzé cedex, F-49071, France. ⁷INRA, UMR1318 IJPB, Saclay Plant Sciences, Route de Saint-Cyr, Versailles Cedex 78026, France.

Received: 23 January 2012 Accepted: 9 May 2012
Published: 9 May 2012

## References

1. Van den Bosch F, Fraaije BA, van den Berg F, Shaw MW: Evolutionary bi-stability in pathogen transmission mode. *Proc Royal Soc B* 2010, 277:1735-1742.

2. Oliver EJ, Thrall PH, Burdon JJ, Ash JE: Vertical disease transmission in the *Cakile-Alternaria* host-pathogen interaction. *Aust J Bot* 2001, 49:561-569.

3. Hewett PD: *Septoria nodorum* on seedlings and stubble of winter wheat. *Trans Br Mycol Soc* 1975, 65:7-18.

4. Baker KF, Smith SH: Dynamics of seed transmission of plant pathogens. *Annu Rev Phytopathol* 1966, 14:311-332.

5. Elmer WH: Seeds as vehicles for pathogen importation. *Biol Invasions* 2001, 3:263-271.

6. Cappelli C: Seeds: pathogen transmission through. In *Encyclopedia of Plant and Crop Science*. Boca Raton. Florida: Taylor & Francis; 2007:1142-1147.

7. Iacomi-Vasilescu B, Bataillé-Simoneau N, Campion C, Dongo A, Laurent E, Serandat I, Hamon B, Simoneau P: Effect of null mutations in the *AbNIK1* gene on saprophytic and parasitic fitness of *Alternaria brassicicola* isolates highly resistant to dicarboximides fungicides. *Plant Pathol* 2008, 57:937-947.

8. Schlaich NL: *Arabidopsis thaliana*: the model plant to study host-pathogen interactions. *Curr Drug Targets* 2011, 12:955-966.

9. Lawrence CB, Mitchell TK, Craven KD, Cho Y, Cramer RA, Kim KH: At death's door: *Alternaria* pathogenicity mechanisms. *Plant Pathol J* 2008, 24:101-111.
10. Maude RB, Humpherson-Jones FM: *Studies on the seed-borne phases of dark leaf spot (Alternaria brassicicola) and grey leaf spot (Alternaria brassicae) of brassicas*. *Ann Appl Biol* 1980, **95**:311–319.

11. Maude RB, Humpherson-Jones FM, Shuring CG: Treatments to control *Phoma* and *Alternaria* infections of brassica seeds. *Plant Pathol* 1984, **33**:525–535.

12. Humpherson-Jones FM: The incidence of *Alternaria* spp. and *Leptosphaeria maculans* in commercial brassica seed in the United Kingdom. *Plant Pathology* 1985, **34**:385–390.

13. Kubota M, Abiko K, Yanagisawa Y, Nishi K: Frequency of *Alternaria brassicicola* in commercial cabbage seeds in Japan. *J Gen Plant Pathol* 2006, **72**:197–204.

14. Humpherson-Jones FM, Maude RB: *Studies on the epidemiology of *Alternaria brassicicola* in Brassica oleracea* seed production crops. *Ann Appl Biol* 1982, **100**:61–71.

15. Knox-Davies PS: Relationships between *Alternaria brassicicola* and *Brassica seeds*. *Trans Br Mycol Soc* 1979, **73**:235–248.

16. Maude RB: Seed-borne diseases and their control: principles and practice. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB International; 1996.

17. Singh D: *Mathur SB: Histopathology of seed-borne infections*. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press LLC; 2004.

18. Dongo A, Bataillé-Simoneau N, Campion C, Guillemette T, Hamon B, Iacomi-Vasilescu B, Katz L, Simoneau P: The group III two-component histidine kinase of filamentous fungi is involved in the fungicidal activity of the bacterial polyketide ambruticin. *Appl Environ Microbiol* 2009, **75**:127–134.

19. Thomma BPHJ: *Alternaria* spp.: from general saprophyte to specific parasite. *Molecular Plant Pathology* 2003, **4**:225–236.

20. Köhl J, van der Wolf JM: *Alternaria brassicicola* and *Xanthomonas campestris* pv. *campestris* in organic seed production of *Brassicae*: epidemiology and seed infection. *Wageningen: Plant Research International* 2005, Note 363, [http://edepot.wur.nl/17130].

21. Fan CY, Köller W: Diversity of cutinases from plant pathogenic fungi: differential and sequential expression of cutinolytic esterases by *Alternaria brassicicola*. *FEMS Microbiol Lett* 1998, **158**:33–38.

22. Srivastava A, Ohm RA, Oxiles L, Brooks F, Lawrence CB, Grigoriev IV, Cho Y: A zinc finger family transcription factor *AbVf19* is required for the induction of a gene subset important for virulence in *Alternaria brassicicola*. *Mol Plant-Microbe Interact* 2012, **25**:443–452.

23. Vaughan DA, Kunwar IK, Sinclair JB, Bernard RL: Routes of entry of *Alternaria* sp. into soybean seed coats. *Seed Science and Technology* 1988, **16**:725–731.

24. Shirley BW, Kubasek WL, Storz G, Bruggemann E, Koornneef M, Ausubel FM, Goodman HM: Analysis of *Arabidopsis* mutants deficient in flavonoid biosynthesis. *Plant Journal* 1995, **8**:659–671.

25. Routaboul JM, Kerhoas L, Debeaujon I, Pourcel L, Caboche M, Einhorn J, Lepiniec L: Flavonoid diversity and biosynthesis in seed of *Arabidopsis thaliana*. *Planta* 2006, **224**:96–107.

26. Pourcel L, Routaboul JM, Cheynier V, Lepiniec L, Debeaujon I: Flavonoid oxidation in plants: from biochemical properties to physiological functions. *Trends Plant Sci* 2007, **12**:29–36.

27. Mohamed-Yaseen Y, Barringer SA, Splittstoesser WE, Costanza S: The role of seed coats in seed viability. *Bot Rev* 1994, **60**:246–260.

28. Böttcher C, von Roepenack-Lahaye E, Schmidt J, Schmotz C, Neumann S, Scheel D, Clemens S: Metabolome analysis of biosynthetic mutants reveals a diversity of metabolic changes and allows identification of a large number of new compounds in *Arabidopsis*. *Plant Physiol* 2008, **147**:2107–2120.

29. Sellam A, Iacomi-Vasilescu B, Hudhomme P, Simoneau P: *In vitro* antifungal activity of brassinin, camalexin and two isothiocyanates against the crucifer pathogens *Alternaria brassicicola* and *Alternaria brassicae*. *Plant Pathol* 2007, **56**:296–301.

30. Debeaujon I, Léon-Kloosterziel KM, Koornneef M: Influence of the testa on seed dormancy, germination, and longevity in *Arabidopsis*. *Plant Physiol* 2000, **122**:403–413.

31. Rodríguez G: Lecture Notes on Generalized Linear Models. 2007, [http://data.princeton.edu/wws509/notes/].

32. R Development Core Team: *R: a language and environment for statistical computing*. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010.

33. Truernit E, Haseloff J: A simple way to identify non-viable cells within living plant tissue using confocal microscopy. *Plant Methods* 2008, **4**:15.

34. Hoch HC, Galvani CD, Szarowski DH, Turner JN: Two new fluorescent dyes applicable for visualization of fungal cell walls. *Mycologia* 2005, **9**:580–588.

doi:10.1186/1746-4811-8-16

Cite this article as: Pochon et al.: The *Arabidopsis thaliana*-*Alternaria brassicicola* pathosystem: A model interaction for investigating seed transmission of necrotrophic fungi. *Plant Methods* 2012 8:16.

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:

• Convenient online submission

• Thorough peer review

• No space constraints or color figure charges

• Immediate publication on acceptance

• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

• Research which is freely available for redistribution

Submit your manuscript at
www.biomedcentral.com/submit

BioMed Central