# Functionalized Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery, One- and Two-photon Photodynamic Therapy as a Promising Treatment of Retinoblastoma

Audrey Gallud, Afitz da Silva, Marie Maynadier, Ilaria Basile, Fontanel Simon, Lemaire Cyndie, Philippe Maillard, Mireille Blanchard-Desce, Olivier Mongin, Alain Morère, et al.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## ► To cite this version:

Audrey Gallud, Afitz da Silva, Marie Maynadier, Ilaria Basile, Fontanel Simon, et al.. Functionalized Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery, One- and Two-photon Photodynamic Therapy as a Promising Treatment of Retinoblastoma. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2013, pp.100288. 10.4172/2155-9570.1000288. hal-01133740

HAL Id: hal-01133740

https://hal.science/hal-01133740

Submitted on 1 Jun 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Functionalized Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery, One- and Two-photon Photodynamic Therapy as a Promising Treatment of Retinoblastoma

Audrey Gallud<fnref n="1" />, Afitz Da Silva<fnref n="1" />, Marie Maynadier<fnref n="1" />, Ilaria Basile<fnref n="1" />, Simon Fontanel<fnref n="1" />, Cyndie Lemaire<fnref n="1" />, Philippe Maillard<fnref n="2" />, Mireille Blanchard-Desce<fnref n="3" />, Olivier Mongin<fnref n="3" />, Alain Morère<fnref n="1" />, Jean-Olivier Durand<fnref n="4" />, Laurence Raehm<fnref n="4" />, Marcel Garcia<fnref n="1" /> and Magali Gary-Bobo<fnref n="1" />*

## Abstract

Retinoblastoma is a rare cancer triggered by genetic mutation that forms in the eyes of children. In industrialized countries, 95% of patients are cured by chemotherapy and conservative treatments. However these treatments can increase the risk of secondary tumors in patients with a constitutional alteration of the retinoblastoma gene *Rb1*. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) represents a therapeutic approach and may reduce the incidence of secondary tumors. PDT is an established cancer treatment based on the light activation of a photosensitizing agent thus generating cytotoxic reactive oxygen species that cause cellular damage. We focused on mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) for one-photon excited PDT combined with drug delivery and carbohydrate targeting applied on retinoblastoma. We demonstrated that bitherapy (camptothecin delivery and PDT) performed with MSN was efficient in inducing retinoblastoma cell death. Alternatively, MSN designed for two-photon excited PDT were also studied and irradiation in near-infrared at low fluency efficiently killed retinoblastoma cancer cells. These data provide new evidences of the potential of functionalized and targeted MSN for treatment of retinoblastoma and could lead to propose a non-invasive therapy with reduced side effects.

**Keywords:** Mesoporous silica nanoparticles; Two-photon; Photodynamic therapy; Drug delivery; Mannose; Galactose; Targeting; Retinoblastoma

## Introduction

Retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular malignant tumor in childhood with an incidence of 1 for 20,000 births which occurs during the first five years of life. The retinoblastoma cell of origin has been debated for over a century; however, we now have a detailed understanding of the neuronal pathways that are deregulated in the primitive cells of the retina. The role of genomic instability of the retinoblastoma gene *Rb1* localized on chromosome 13q and the most relevant epidemiological issues concerning retinoblastoma have recently been pointed out to explain the variegated clinical expression of the disease [1-3]. The most common signs of retinoblastoma are a visible whiteness in the pupil called leukocoria and a strabismus. The unilateral form of the disease represents 70% of cases; however 30% of children develop the bilateral form in both eyes.

Retinoblastoma is often curable when it is diagnosed early, but if it is not treated promptly, this cancer can spread beyond the eye to other parts of the body. When tumor is exclusively localize into the eye, the majority of patients can be cured by therapeutic treatments including enucleation or conservative treatments using, intravenous and/or intra-arterial chemotherapy [4,5], cryotherapy [6], local thermotherapy or brachytherapy. External beam radiotherapy is increasingly restricted due to the risk of late effects. The potential risks of late effects associated with chemotherapy and carboplatin include increased risk of second cancer, as well as short-term important side effects. Besides, due to the lack of blood supply to vitreous seeding, chemotherapy drugs could not reach the vitreous body through blood-retinal barrier. This is one of the important limiting factors which triggered intravenous chemotherapy as a new injection technique for vitreous disease in retinoblastoma [7].

In this context, nanotechnologies seem to offer new perspectives for the treatment of retinoblastoma [8]. From day to day nanomedicine

appears as a non-invasive therapeutic solution. Encapsulated in nanocarriers, drugs could target only cancer cells by considering the tumor microenvironment, the biomarkers overexpressed on the cancer cells and different physical methods for non-invasive therapies [9]. The photodynamic therapy (PDT) is one of the biophysical methods of nanoparticle activation based on the combination of three partners which are a light-activated photosensitizer encapsulated in the nanoparticle, the surrounding oxygen able to produce a toxic compound and an energy laser beam to induce activation [10]. The activated photosensitizers transfer their energy to molecular oxygen which forms highly reactive singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen species. This phenomenon induces the death of cells having internalized photosensitizers. It is important to note that the photosensitizers are photoactivable by a near-infrared wavelength that is non-mutagenic [11]. Since few years, the specific targeting of nanomedicine to carbohydrate receptors performs a useful strategy for improving the efficacy of treatments. Recently, carbohydrate-targeted systems have been developed to target cancer. Nanoparticles loaded with photosensitizers and covalently linked with mannose residues were synthesized and their improvement uptake in cancer cells was demonstrated *in vitro* and *in vivo* [12-15].

*Corresponding author: Magali Gary-Bobo, Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron, CNRS UMR5247, Université de Montpellier 1, Université de Montpellier 2, Faculté de Pharmacie, 15 avenue Charles Flahault, 34093 Montpellier, France, E-mail: magali.gary-bobo@inserm.fr

Received June 14, 2013; Accepted July 17, 2013; Published July 23, 2013

**Citation:** Gallud A, Silva J.D., Maynadier M, Basile I, Fontanel S, et al. (2013) Functionalized Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery, One- and Two-photon Photodynamic Therapy as a Promising Treatment of Retinoblastoma. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 4: 288. doi:10.4172/2155-9570.1000288

**Copyright:** © 2013 Gallud A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

<footnote n="1">¹Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron, CNRS UMR5247, Université de Montpellier 1, Université de Montpellier 2, Faculté de Pharmacie, 15 avenue Charles Flahault, 34093 Montpellier, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Institut Curie, Section de Recherches, Centre Universitaire, Université Paris-Sud, F-91405 Orsay, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Chimie et Photonique Moléculaires, CNRS UMR 6510, Campus de Beaulieu, Université Rennes 1, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier, UMR 5253, CNRS-UM2-ENSCM-UM1, CC1701 Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France</footnote>
In this study, we followed-up of the efficiently internalization of
mannose functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) in
solid tumor. Then, we focused on MSN potential for one-photon PDT
combined with drug delivery and carbohydrate targeting applied on a
human retinoblastoma cell line. A comparison with MSN designed for
two-photon PDT indicated the potential of this technique to efficiently
kill retinoblastoma cancer cells using irradiation at low fluency.

Materials and Methods

Synthesis of MSN

Different nanoparticles were designed linked or not with galactose (Gal) or mannose (Man) residues and loaded with or without fluorescein (FITC), camptothecin (CPT), one-photon photosensitizer (1γPS) or two-photon photosensitizer (2γPS). Synthesizes of MSN-FITC, MSN-FITC-Man, MSN-(CPT)-Gal or -Man, MSN-(CPT+1γPS)-Gal or -Man, MSN-(1γPS)-Man and MSN-(2γPS)-Man were already described in our previous work [8,12,13].

Cell culture conditions

Human retinoblastoma cancer cells (Y-79) were purchased from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA). Cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 (RPMI 1640) culture medium supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum, 100 U.mL⁻¹ streptomycin and allowed to grow in humidified atmosphere at 37°C under 5% CO₂.

Distribution of MSN in xenografted nude mice

Eight nude mice were subcutaneously injected in the flank with 10⁶
cells of pancreatic cancer cell line (capan-1). One month after cancer
cell injection, 6 mice had developed subcutaneous tumors with a mean
tumor volume of 500 mm³. Mice (n=2) were injected intravenously
with 200 µL of physiological serum alone (control) or supplemented
with MSN-FITC (n=2) or MSN-FITC-Man (n=2) (16 mg.kg⁻¹). Three
hours later, mice were sacrificed and tumor, kidneys and liver were
removed. Then organs were crushed and distribution of MSN was
quantified by measurement of FITC intensity, excitation 485 nm and
emission 538 nm, through a fluorescence microplate reader (Gemini,
Molecular Devices).

PDT one and two-photon excitation and phototoxicity
measurement

For monophotonic irradiation, Y-79 cells were seeded into 96-well
plates at 10,000 cells per well in 100 µL culture medium and allowed
to grow for 24 h. Then cells were incubated for 24 h with or without
20 µg.mL⁻¹ MSN. After incubation, cells were submitted or not to laser
irradiation for 30 min (650 nm, 90 J.cm⁻²). For two-photon excitation
irradiation, Y-79 cells were seeded into 384 multi-well glass bottom
(thickness 0.17 mm), with a black polystyrene frame, 2,000 cells per well
in 50 µL culture medium and allowed to grow for 24 h. Cells were then
incubated for 24 h with or without 20 µg.mL⁻¹ MSN. After incubation
with MSN, cells were submitted or not to laser irradiation. Scanned
areas were 1.5 × 1.5 mm². The entire area of the well was irradiated
at 760 nm by 3 scans of 1.25 s each. The average power delivered to
the sample was measured with a thermoelectric optical energy meter
and was 47 J.cm⁻². The laser beam is focused by a microscope objective
lens (10X, NA 0.4). Two day after irradiations (one- or two-photon),
a MTS assay was performed to evaluate the phototoxicity of MSN
by adding 333 µg.mL⁻¹ of tetrazolium salt (CellTiter 96 aqueous One
Solution Reagent, Promega) solution. Cells were incubated 3 h at 37°C

and the absorbance was read at 490 nm in a plate reader to determine
the formazan concentration, which is proportional to the number of
living cells.

Cytotoxicity assay for drug delivery

For these experiments, Y-79 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 10,000 cells per well in 100 µL culture medium and allowed to grow for 24 h. Then cells were incubated at different times with or without 20 µg.mL⁻¹ MSN. To evaluate the cytotoxicity of MSN, a MTS assay was performed as described above.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t test to
compare paired groups of data. A *p* value of <0.05 was considered to be
statistically significant.

Results

In previous work, we demonstrated the lectin-mediated cellular
uptake of functionalized nanoparticles and the specific endocytosis
involving carbohydrate receptors expressed by cancer cells [8]. Here, we
designed MSN encapsulated with fluorescein (FITC) or camptothecin
(CPT) or a porphyrin derivative one-photon photosensitizer (1γPS)
[11] or a fluorene derivative two-photon photosensitizer (2γPS) [16]
grafted with mannose or galactose through a squarate linker (Figure 1).
In this work, we first verified the potential accumulation of MSN linked
with mannose residue into mice tumors. For this, nude mice with
subcutaneous tumors were intravenously injected with FITC-loaded
MSN covered or not with mannose (Figure 1A). Three hours after
injection we observed a higher accumulation in tumor of mice treated
with MSN-FITC-Man, while MSN-FITC was mainly retained by liver
(Figure 2). This demonstrates the high tumor-targeting efficiency of
mannose residues grafted at the surface of MSN.

Then, we focused on Y-79 retinoblastoma cells in order to provide
new evidences of the potential of targeted MSN for the treatment of
retinoblastoma. To evaluate the efficiency of drug delivery combining

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1: Structure of MSN-(CPT)-Gal/Man, MSN-(CPT+1sPS)-Gal/Man, MSN-(1sPS)-Man and MSN-(2sPS)-Man nanoparticles.** A. Structure of fluorescein (FITC) B. Structure of camptothecin (CPT) C. Structure of porphyrin derivative one photon photosensitizer (1sPS) D. Structure of fluorene derivative two photon photosensitizer (2sPS).</figcaption></figure>
to PDT, cells were treated with MSN-(CPT)-Gal or -Man, MSN-(CPT+1vPS)-Gal or -Man (Figure 1B and 1C). CPT-drug delivery on Y-79 cells treated with MSN-(CPT)-Gal or -Man induced 24% and 26% of cell death, respectively. In contrast, when irradiated MSN-(CPT+1vPS)-Gal or -Man induced 68% and 58% of cell death, respectively (Figure 3). We have verified that MSN-(CPT+1vPS)-Gal/ Man were no more toxic in the dark than MSN-(CPT)-Gal/Man and that irradiation alone was not toxic for cells (data not shown). These results suggest that a high therapeutic potential of synergistic use of drug delivery and PDT can be provided using the same MSN.

We next compared the PDT efficiency between 2vPS encapsulated
mannose-grafted MSN (Figure 1D) and 1vPS-loaded one (Figure
1C). Cells were incubated for 24 h with 20 µg.mL⁻¹ of MSN-(1vPS)-
Man or MSN-(2vPS)-Man and one-photon (90 J.cm⁻²) or two-photon
(47 J.cm⁻²) irradiations were performed. As shown in Figure 4, the
photodynamic therapeutic potential of MSN-(2vPS)-Man is clearly
higher even if power is less intense, 67% of cell death, than MSN-
(1vPS)-Man, 28% of cell death. The nanoparticles were found to be
non-toxic without irradiation and irradiation alone did not damage the
cells (data not shown). These results indicate that MSN designed for
two-photon excitation PDT present interesting therapeutic properties
to kill retinoblastoma cancer cells.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2:** Distribution of nanoparticles intravenously injected in tumor-xenografted nude mice. MSN were covalently loaded with fluorescein (FITC) and grafted or not with mannose (Man). Mice were treated with 16 µg.mL⁻¹ and sacrificed 3 h after injection.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3:** Additional effect of drug delivery and one photon PDT on retinoblastoma cells. Y-79 cells were incubated or not (control) with 20 µg.mL⁻¹ for 24 h with MSN-(CPT)-Gal or -Man and MSN-(CPT+1vPS)-Gal or -Man and then submitted to laser irradiation (650 nm, 90 J.cm⁻²). Cells were allowed to grow for 2 days and cell viability was quantified. Statistically different *p* < 0.05 from control (Student's test).</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4:** Comparison of PDT effect between two photon excitation and one photon excitation on retinoblastoma cells. A. Y-79 cells were incubated or not (control) with 20 µg.mL⁻¹ for 24 h with MSN-(1vPS)-Man or MSN-(2vPS)-Man, and then irradiated at 650 nm (30 min, 90 J.cm⁻²) or at 760 nm (3 x 1.25 s, 47 J.cm⁻²), respectively. Cell viability was quantified two days after. Statistically different *p* < 0.05 from control (Student's test). B. Irradiated zone showing photo-induced cell death.</figcaption></figure>

Conclusion

In this study, a significant therapeutic synergy between one-photon PDT combined with CPT-drug delivery has been revealed. Furthermore, promising results of two-photon PDT were obtained at 760 nm irradiation and low fluency 47 J.cm⁻². Using of two-photon photosensitizers the window for excitation is extended into the near infrared region, thereby making the process more viable to be used on the human body. The data provide new evidences of the potential of functionalized and targeted MSN for treatment of retinoblastoma and could lead to propose a non-invasive therapy. Considering their sizes and properties in release, specific targeting and minimizing or eliminate side effects resulting directly from current administration methods, MSN appear to be the most promising tool to meet the primary requirements of an ideal ocular delivery system [17]. Current investigations are carried out to identify which carbohydrate receptors are overexpressed in retinoblastoma to improve therapeutic efficiency.

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by ANR PNANO 07-102, GDR "GDR CNRS 3049
Photomed "Médicaments photoactivables – Photochimiothérapie", Association
pour la Recherche sur le Cancer" n° SFI20101201906 and the non-profit
organization "Rétinostop".

References

1. De Francesco S, Galluzzi P, Del Longo A, Piozzi E, Renieri A, et al. (2012) 13q deletion syndrome and retinoblastoma in identical dichorionic diamniotic monozygotic twins. Eur J Ophthalmol 22: 857-860.

2. Mastrangelo D, De Francesco S, Di Leonardo A, Lentini L, Hadjistilianou T (2008) The retinoblastoma paradigm revisited. Med Sci Monit 14: RA231-240.

3. McEvoy J, Flores-Otero J, Zhang J, Nemeth K, Brennan R, et al. (2011) Coexpression of normally incompatible developmental pathways in retinoblastoma genesis. Cancer Cell 20: 260-275.

4. Abramson DH, Marr BP, Dunkel JI, Brodie S, Zabor EC, et al. (2011) Intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma in eyes with vitreous and/or subretinal seeding: 2-year results. Br J Ophthalmol 96: 499-502.

5. Choi S, Han JW, Kim H, Kim BS, Kim DJ, et al. (2013) Combined chemotherapy and intra-arterial chemotherapy of retinoblastoma. Korean J Pediatr 56: 254-259.

6. Shields JA, Shields CL, De Potter P (1993) Cryotherapy for retinoblastoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 33: 101-105.

7. Munier FL, Gaillard MC, Balmer A, Soliman S, Podilsky G, et al. (2012)
Intravitreal chemotherapy for vitreous disease in retinoblastoma revisited: from prohibition to conditional indications. Br J Ophthalmol 96: 1078-1083.

8. Gary-Bobo M, Hocine O, Brevet D, Maynadier M, Raehm L, et al. (2012) Cancer therapy improvement with mesoporous silica nanoparticles combining targeting, drug delivery and PDT. Int J Pharm 423: 509-515.

9. Gary-Bobo M, Vaillant O, Maynadier M, Basile I, Gallud A, et al. (2013) Targeting multiplicity: the key factor for anti-cancer nanoparticles. Curr Med Chem 20: 1946-1955.

10. Wilson BC, Patterson MS (2008) The physics, biophysics and technology of photodynamic therapy. Phys Med Biol 53: R61-109.

11. Laville I, Pigaglio S, Blais JC, Doz F, Loock B, et al. (2006) Photodynamic efficiency of diethylene glycol-linked glycoconjugated porphyrins in human retinoblastoma cells. J Med Chem 49: 2558-2567.

12. Brevet D, Gary-Bobo M, Raehm L, Richeter S, Hocine O, et al. (2009) Mannose-targeted mesoporous silica nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy. Chem Commun (Camb) 28: 1475-1477.

13. Gary-Bobo M, Mir Y, Rouxel C, Brevet D, Basile I, et al. (2011) Mannose-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for efficient two-photon photodynamic therapy of solid tumors. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50: 11425-11429.

14. Hocine O, Gary-Bobo M, Brevet D, Maynadier M, Fontanel S, et al. (2010) Silicalites and Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy. Int J Pharm 402: 221-230.

15. Lupu M, Thomas CD, Maillard P, Loock B, Chauvin B, et al. (2009) 23Na MRI longitudinal follow-up of PDT in a xenograft model of human retinoblastoma. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 6: 214-220.

16. Blanchard-Desce M, Brevet D, Durand JO, Garcia M, Gary-Bobo M, et al. (2011) Photosensibilisateurs biphotoniques, nanoparticules les contenant et leur utilisation comme médicaments. Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) WO 2011/073054 A1: 1-12.

17. Liu S, Jones L, Gu FX (2012) Nanomaterials for ocular drug delivery. Macromol Biosci 12: 608-620.

**Citation:** Gallud A, Silva AD, Maynadier M, Basile I, Fontanel S, et al. (2013) Functionalized Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery, One- and Two-photon Photodynamic Therapy as a Promising Treatment of Retinoblastoma. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 4: 288. doi:10.4172/2155-9570.1000288

## Submit your next manuscript and get advantages of OMICS Group submissions

**Unique features:**

* User friendly/feasible website-translation of your paper to 50 world's leading languages

* Audio Version of published paper

* Digital articles to share and explore

**Special features:**

* 250 Open Access Journals

* 20,000 editorial team

* 21 days rapid review process

* Quality and quick editorial, review and publication processing

* Indexing at PubMed (partial), Scopus, EBSCO, Index Copernicus and Google Scholar etc

* Sharing Option: Social Networking Enabled

* Authors, Reviewers and Editors rewarded with online Scientific Credits

* Better discount for your subsequent articles

Submit your manuscript at: www.editorialmanager.com/clinicalgroup