# Reproducibility and transparency: why following MISEV guidelines is beneficial for the studies on EVs and brain barriers

Julien Saint-Pol

► To cite this version:

Julien Saint-Pol. Reproducibility and transparency: why following MISEV guidelines is beneficial for the studies on EVs and brain barriers. Extracellular Vesicles and Circulating Nucleic Acids, 2025, 6, pp.328 - 35. 10.20517/evcna.2024.63. hal-05142699

HAL Id: hal-05142699

https://hal.science/hal-05142699v1

Submitted on 3 Jul 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
**Letter to Editor**

**Open Access**

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Reproducibility and transparency: why following MISEV guidelines is beneficial for the studies on EVs and brain barriers

Julien Saint-Pol

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Université d'Artois, Blood-Brain Barrier laboratory (LBHE - UR2465), Faculté des Sciences Jean Perrin, F-62300 Lens, France.

**Correspondence to:** Dr. Julien Saint-Pol, Université d'Artois, Blood-Brain Barrier laboratory (LBHE - UR2465), Faculté des Sciences Jean Perrin, Rue Jean Souvraz, F-62300 Lens, France. E-mail: julien.saintpol@univ-artois.fr

**How to cite this article:** Saint-Pol J. Reproducibility and transparency: why following MISEV guidelines is beneficial for the studies on EVs and brain barriers. *Extracellular Vesicles Circ Nucleic Acids*. 2025;6:328-35. https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/evcna.2024.63

**Received:** 22 Aug 2024 **First Decision:** 27 Sep 2024 **Revised:** 20 Jun 2025 **Accepted:** 25 Jun 2025 **Published:** 3 Jul 2025

**Academic Editor:** Shilpa Buch **Copy Editor:** Ting-Ting Hu **Production Editor:** Ting-Ting Hu

**Keywords:** Extracellular vesicles, MISEV, brain barriers, blood-brain barrier, blood-CSF barrier, blood-retina barrier, arachnoid-CSF barrier, blood-nerve barrier

Over the past two decades, research on extracellular vesicles (EVs) has surged, driven by their role as key regulators of intercellular communication, pathological biomarkers, and their potential use as therapeutic vectors. A particular area of interest is their ability to traverse biological barriers, notably the brain barriers, such as the blood-brain barrier (BBB), to optimize the delivery of pharmacological and epigenetic regulatory compounds to the brain. However, to ensure the reproducibility and transparency of findings and to standardize EV nomenclature, it is imperative to adopt rigorous research methodologies. Under the guidance of the International Society of Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV), the Minimum Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (MISEV) was first published in 2014 and updated in 2018 and 2023 to reflect advances in technology and theory. The objective of this editorial is to inform researchers and journal reviewers of the key considerations necessary for producing high-quality publications in the EV and brain barrier research domains.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

© The Author(s) 2025. **Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>
THE BRAIN BARRIERS AS A PROVIDENTIAL PLAYGROUND FOR EV STUDIES

The central and peripheral nervous systems are protected by five specialized barriers - the BBB, blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB), arachnoid-cerebrospinal fluid (CFS) barrier, blood-retina barrier (BRB), and blood-nerve barrier (BNB) - that regulate nutrient transport, waste clearance, and homeostasis[¹⁻⁶] [Figure 1]. While structurally distinct, these barriers share a dependence on intercellular communication to maintain their integrity.

The BBB, the most studied, is composed of endothelial cells sealed by tight junctions, supported by astrocytes, pericytes, and neurons forming the neurovascular unit (NVU). It restricts paracellular transport and employs efflux pumps (e.g., P-gp, BCRP) and enzymes (e.g., MAO, CYPs) to protect the brain; dysfunction is linked to neurodegenerative diseases[⁷⁻¹¹]. The BCSFB, formed by choroid plexus epithelial cells, fenestrated endothelial cells, and immune components, regulates CSF production and molecular exchange[²,⁵,¹²]. The arachnoid-CSF barrier, located within the meninges, protects CSF from toxic infiltration[¹]. The BRB consists of inner endothelial and outer retinal pigment epithelial cells (RPECs), reinforced by Müller cells and pericytes, and employs transporters such as GLUT1 and P-gp[⁴,¹³]. The BNB comprises endoneurial endothelial cells, supported by Schwann cells, tactocytes, and perineurial cells, to regulate the peripheral nerve microenvironment[¹⁴,¹⁵].

Numerous experimental models have been developed to study these barriers. *In vitro* systems, including co-cultures and organ-on-chip platforms, are widely used but often lack full physiological complexity[¹⁶⁻¹⁸]. Barrier-specific *in vitro* models, e.g., BBB co- or tri-cultures, retinal pigment epithelial cells (RPECs) monolayers for the BRB, and choroid plexus cultures for the BCSFB, enable targeted studies, though glial components are often underrepresented[²,⁴,⁶,¹⁹⁻²¹]. In vivo rodent models remain essential for understanding barrier dynamics and drug delivery but face translational limitations due to interspecies differences[²²⁻²⁵]. The zebrafish has emerged as a complementary model, offering optical transparency, conserved barrier features, and suitability for developmental and pharmacological studies[²⁶⁻²⁹]. Meanwhile, human stem cell-derived models and 3D brain/retina organoids are improving *in vitro* relevance by better replicating human transporter expression and cellular architecture, although challenges in reproducibility and scalability persist[³⁰⁻³²].

In parallel, EVs have gained attention as key players in brain barriers research. These lipid bilayer-enclosed vesicles, secreted by nearly all eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, include exosomes and ectosomes and are found in fluids such as blood, CSF, urine, and saliva[³³,³⁴]. EVs carry bioactive cargo - proteins, lipids, mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs, and DNA fragments - and mediate intercellular communication through membrane fusion, endocytosis, or receptor binding[³⁵⁻³⁷]. Owing to their presence in accessible fluids and tissue-specific molecular signatures, EVs are promising non-invasive biomarkers in diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and glioblastoma[³⁸⁻⁴¹]. Moreover, their biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and targeting ability position them as attractive therapeutic vehicles, capable of delivering siRNAs, anti-inflammatory agents, and chemotherapeutics across CNS barriers[⁴²,⁴³]. Stem cell-derived EVs also offer intrinsic neuroprotective and regenerative potential, with applications in neurodegenerative diseases and spinal cord repair[⁴⁴,⁴⁵]. Their ability to cross barriers such as the BBB and BRB in both directions enables them to modulate barrier integrity, immune responses, and neuroinflammatory pathways, as well as regulate neuronal signaling, glial interactions, and neuroimmune responses[⁴⁶⁻⁵²]. Their transport properties have been studied *in vitro* using BBB and BRB models and *in vivo* through rodent and zebrafish tracking studies[⁵³⁻⁵⁵]. Nevertheless, challenges persist in standardizing EV isolation, quantification, and mechanistic understanding of such transport.
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Location and main features of the brain barriers. Brain barriers serve as protective interfaces for both the central and peripheral nervous systems. While their anatomical locations vary, they share structural similarities and undergo comparable postnatal maturation processes. These features collectively contribute to their essential role in safeguarding the nervous system and maintaining its homeostasis. For further details, see reviews [1-6].</figcaption></figure>

Consequently, no single model can fully capture the complexity of the brain barriers. A multimodal, cross-species strategy - integrating *in vitro* platforms, rodent and zebrafish models, human stem cell-derived systems, and EV-based approaches - is essential for advancing mechanistic insights and fostering translational progress in barrier-related diagnostics and therapeutics. However, key challenges persist, including the heterogeneity of EV populations, the lack of standardized isolation protocols, and the need for scalable production methods. In this context, adherence to the MISEV [56-59] guidelines is particularly relevant to brain barrier research, as it promotes methodological transparency and improves the reproducibility of EV-based experiments.

AS IN ALL AREAS OF RESEARCH, STANDARDIZATION AND TRANSPARENCY ARE
CRUCIAL TO ENSURE THE QUALITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF EV-BASED STUDIES
ON BRAIN BARRIERS

Given the expanding body of research on EVs, the risk of inconsistencies in nomenclature and characterization has increased, potentially undermining study transparency and reproducibility. This justified the introduction of the MISEV guidelines in 2014[56], followed by updates in 2018[58] and 2023[59] to accommodate evolving techniques and knowledge. The widespread adoption of these guidelines, as evidenced by their global implementation [Figure 2], reflects a collective commitment among research teams to refine and standardize EV studies for improved accuracy and reproducibility. These principles are vital, particularly considering EVs’ promising applications in therapeutics. Notably, the MISEV guidelines are not restrictive but provide a flexible framework that encourages innovation and the integration of novel techniques for EV analysis and characterization. As in any field of research, EV-based studies on brain barriers benefit in robustness and reliability when conducted in accordance with MISEV recommendations, whether using *in vitro* or *in vivo* approaches.
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** The Global Expansion of MISEV from 2014 to 2023. The growing awareness of the need for standardization, transparency, and reproducibility in EV-based research has spread worldwide like a wave. Since the first MISEV guidelines were introduced in 2014, co-authored by 15 researchers, their impact has significantly expanded. The 2018 update was endorsed by 390 authors, while the 2023 edition saw contributions from 72 principal authors and over 1,000 members of the MISEV Consortium. This map illustrates the geographic distribution of MISEV authors from its inception to its most recent update in 2023, reflecting its increasing global adoption. MISEV: Minimum information for studies of extracellular vesicles; EV: extracellular vesicle.</figcaption></figure>

In alignment with prior versions, MISEV2023 maintains “extracellular vesicle” as the preferred term, acknowledging the inherent diversity of EVs in terms of size, biogenesis, and function. The guidelines encourage precise classification when possible, employing descriptors such as “small EVs” (sEVs) or “medium/large EVs” (m/LEVs) based on size. A recent study by Dahlstroem *et al*. further underscores this diversity by demonstrating an alternative pathway for exosome secretion via ALG-2-interacting protein X (Alix), recruiting CD63+ late endosomes rather than following the canonical early-to-late endosome and multivesicular body (MVB) pathway[60]. This finding reinforces the notion that “exosome” remains a broad term encompassing heterogeneous vesicle populations.

To ensure the rigorous characterization of EVs, MISEV2023 advocates for the application of multiple orthogonal methods. These include the quantification and standardized preparation of EVs to enhance reproducibility. Researchers must distinguish EV markers to refine their characterization: (i) EV-associated transmembrane or cytosolic protein markers such as tetraspanins (CD9, CD81, CD63) and ESCRT-associated proteins; (ii) negative markers to confirm the absence of contaminants from non-EV structures, such as apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoA-1); (iii) non-EV markers that indicate specific cellular or subcellular origins such as α-actinin 4. Additionally, complementary omics approaches (proteomics, lipidomics, and transcriptomics) are recommended for in-depth EV characterization. Given the wide variety of cell types that constitute brain barrier phenotypes or contribute to their respective microenvironments, it is crucial to consider the diverse biogenesis pathways of EVs when identifying so-called “signature” proteins of specific EV populations. This consideration is particularly important for ectosomes, due to their high heterogeneity and the fact that their biogenesis can be closely linked to the cell of origin or the physiopathological context under investigation - such as in the case of protrusion-derived EVs[61]. For functional studies, MISEV2023 insists on stringent controls to ensure that observed effects are attributable to EVs rather than co-isolated molecules or experimental artifacts. The guidelines also underscore recent advances in EV isolation techniques, including differential ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), and affinity-based methods. To ensure transparency and reproducibility, researchers are expected to thoroughly document methodological parameters such as processing times, centrifugation speeds, and materials used[59]. In the context of brain barrier research, it is further recommended to provide detailed information on the experimental models employed and, where feasible, to include validation in *in vivo* systems to support physiological relevance.
To further align with MISEV recommendations, researchers are encouraged to follow a structured checklist encompassing EV characterization, quantification, and functional validation. In *in vivo* studies, EV tracking commonly relies on labeling strategies such as CD63 tagging or staining with lipophilic dyes like PKH. However, despite their widespread use and apparent relevance for brain barrier studies[54,62,63], PKH dyes present significant limitations due to their poor stability and potential for non-specific signal retention, warranting cautious application[64]. Additionally, MISEV2023 emphasizes the importance of data transparency and reproducibility, advocating for the use of public repositories and standardized formats - such as those supported by the EV-TRACK platform - to enhance data comparability across studies[65,66]. The guidelines also underscore ethical considerations, particularly in the context of *in vivo* experimentation and clinical translation, and highlight the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to address the technical and conceptual challenges that persist in the EV research field. While MISEV provides overarching guidelines applicable to all EV studies, it is complemented by sample-specific recommendations that are commonly used for brain barrier studies and developed by ISEV task forces: "Blood" task force provides some recommendations for studying EVs from blood and plasma referred to as MIBlood[67,68]; "Cerebrospinal Fluid" task force generated guidelines tailored for CSF-derived EVs[69]; "Conditioned Medium" task force produced a position paper with all the considerations for studying EVs from conditioned media[70] (https://www.isev.org/task-forces). These specialized recommendations ensure that EV research on brain barriers accounts for sample-specific nuances, whether derived from cell culture media or biological fluids. Specifically, for biofluids such as CSF and plasma - both of which have complex and diverse compositions - strict adherence to standardized collection and pre-processing methods is essential to enhance experimental reproducibility. Filtration and/or double centrifugation steps are recommended to remove cellular debris and contaminants[68,69], including platelets[68]. A shared recommendation across these references is to ensure higher sample quality and EV purity using SEC. Moreover, it is strongly recommended to perform a comprehensive characterization of EV-associated protein markers using complementary techniques such as nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), proteomics, and flow cytometry[68-70]. Incorporating these approaches in accordance with established guidelines significantly enhances the transparency, rigor, and reproducibility of EV research, particularly in the context of brain barrier studies.

## CONCLUSION

Expanding research on EVs is essential for deepening our understanding of their role in major physiological and pathological processes. These insights will pave the way for developing targeted therapies and identifying early disease biomarkers, ultimately improving patient care[71]. In the context of brain barriers, investigating EVs can enhance our ability to protect the central and peripheral nervous systems, fortify these barriers under pathological conditions, and facilitate their controlled permeation for therapeutic purposes. The prospect of using EVs to selectively target key compartments (brain, nerves, eyes) by modulating barrier integrity or influencing the fate of neural cells holds significant potential for treating associated disorders.

Adhering to MISEV and sample-specific recommendations from ISEV task forces is instrumental in ensuring the reproducibility and transparency of findings. Moreover, addressing critical open questions will propel the field forward: (i) what mechanisms govern EV transport across brain barriers?; (ii) are these mechanisms dependent on EV subtypes?; and (iii) how can these insights be leveraged to optimize therapeutic delivery to the brain? These unresolved inquiries highlight the importance of EV research in brain barrier studies, forming the foundation for future innovations in this rapidly evolving field.
# DECLARATIONS

## Acknowledgments

Saint-Pol J would like to thank Prof. Laurence Tilloy-Fenart, Prof. Fabien Gosselet, and Prof. Yannis Karamanos for their precious advice, support, and proofreading assistance.

## Authors' contributions

The author contributed solely to the article.

## Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

## Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR-21-CE14-0002).

## Conflicts of interest

Saint-Pol J is a Junior Editorial Board member of *Extracellular Vesicles and Circulating Nucleic Acids*. Saint-Pol J was not involved in any steps of editorial processing, notably including reviewer selection, manuscript handling, or decision making.

## Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

## Consent for publication

Not applicable.

## Copyright

© The Author(s) 2025.

# REFERENCES

1. Czarniak N, Kamińska J, Matowicka-Karna J, Koper-Lenkiewicz OM. Cerebrospinal fluid-basic concepts review. *Biomedicines*. 2023;11:1461. DOI PubMed PMC

2. Ghersi-Egea JF, Strazielle N, Catala M, Silva-Vargas V, Doetsch F, Engelhardt B. Molecular anatomy and functions of the choroidal blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier in health and disease. *Acta Neuropathol*. 2018;135:337-61. DOI PubMed

3. Gosselet F, Loiola RA, Roig A, Rosell A, Culot M. Central nervous system delivery of molecules across the blood-brain barrier. *Neurochem Int*. 2021;144:104952. DOI PubMed

4. O'Leary F, Campbell M. The blood-retina barrier in health and disease. *FEBS J*. 2023;290:878-91. DOI PubMed

5. Solár P, Zamani A, Kubíčková L, Dubový P, Joukal M. Choroid plexus and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier in disease. *Fluids Barriers CNS*. 2020;17:35. DOI PubMed PMC

6. Ubogu EE. Biology of the human blood-nerve barrier in health and disease. *Exp Neurol*. 2020;328:113272. DOI PubMed PMC

7. Zlokovic BV, Apuzzo ML. Strategies to circumvent vascular barriers of the central nervous system. *Neurosurgery*. 1998;43:877-8. DOI PubMed

8. Armulik A, Genové G, Betsholtz C. Pericytes: developmental, physiological, and pathological perspectives, problems, and promises. *Dev Cell*. 2011;21:193-215. DOI PubMed

9. Daneman R, Zhou L, Kebede AA, Barres BA. Pericytes are required for blood-brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. *Nature*. 2010;468:562-6. DOI PubMed PMC

10. Menaceur C, Gosselet F, Fenart L, Saint-Pol J. The blood-brain barrier, an evolving concept based on technological advances and cell-cell communications. *Cells*. 2021;11:133. DOI PubMed PMC

11. Nikolakopoulou AM, Montagne A, Kisler K, et al. Pericyte loss leads to circulatory failure and pleiotrophin depletion causing neuron loss. *Nat Neurosci*. 2019;22:1089-98. DOI PubMed PMC

12. Ueno M, Chiba Y, Murakami R, Matsumoto K, Kawauchi M, Fujihara R. Blood-brain barrier and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier in normal and pathological conditions. *Brain Tumor Pathol*. 2016;33:89-96. DOI PubMed

13. Campbell M, Humphries P, et al. The blood-retina barrier: tight junctions and barrier modulation. *Adv Exp Med Biol*. 2012;763:70-84. DOI PubMed
14. Malong L, Napoli I, Casal G, et al. Characterization of the structure and control of the blood-nerve barrier identifies avenues for therapeutic delivery. *Dev Cell*. 2023;58:174-91.e8. DOI PubMed

15. Ma B, Yin C, Hu D, et al. Distribution of non-myelinating Schwann cells and their associations with leukocytes in mouse spleen revealed by immunofluorescence staining. *Eur J Histochem*. 2018;62:2890. DOI PubMed PMC

16. Buchroithner B, Mayr S, Hauser F, et al. Dual channel microfluidics for mimicking the blood-brain barrier. *ACS Nano*. 2021;15:2984-93. DOI PubMed PMC

17. Helms HC, Abbott NJ, Burek M, et al. *In vitro* models of the blood-brain barrier: an overview of commonly used brain endothelial cell culture models and guidelines for their use. *J Cereb Blood Flow Metab*. 2016;36:862-90. DOI PubMed PMC

18. Pérez-López A, Torres-Suárez AI, Martín-Sabroso C, Aparicio-Blanco J. An overview of in vitro 3D models of the blood-brain barrier as a tool to predict the *in vivo* permeability of nanomedicines. *Adv Drug Deliv Rev*. 2023;196:114816. DOI PubMed

19. Brochner CB, Holst CB, Møllgård K. Outer brain barriers in rat and human development. *Front Neurosci*. 2015;9:75. DOI PubMed PMC

20. Monnot AD, Zheng G, Zheng W. Mechanism of copper transport at the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier: influence of iron deficiency in an *in vitro* model. *Exp Biol Med*. 2012;237:327-33. DOI PubMed PMC

21. Reinhold AK, Rittner HL. Barrier function in the peripheral and central nervous system-a review. *Pflugers Arch*. 2017;469:123-34. DOI PubMed

22. Hladky SB, Barrand MA. Fluid and ion transfer across the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers; a comparative account of mechanisms and roles. *Fluids Barriers CNS*. 2016;13:19. DOI PubMed PMC

23. Obermeier B, Daneman R, Ransohoff RM. Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. *Nat Med*. 2013;19:1584-96. DOI PubMed PMC

24. Saunders NR, Dziegielewska KM, Møllgård K, Habgood MD. Recent developments in understanding barrier mechanisms in the developing brain: drugs and drug transporters in pregnancy, susceptibility or protection in the fetal brain? *Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol*. 2019;59:487-505. DOI PubMed

25. Sweeney MD, Zhao Z, Montagne A, Nelson AR, Zlokovic BV. Blood-brain barrier: from physiology to disease and back. *Physiol Rev*. 2019;99:21-78. DOI PubMed PMC

26. Bill BR, Balciunas D, McCarra JA, et al. Development and Notch signaling requirements of the zebrafish choroid plexus. *PLoS One*. 2008;3:e3114. DOI PubMed PMC

27. Jeong JY, Kwon HB, Ahn JC, et al. Functional and developmental analysis of the blood-brain barrier in zebrafish. *Brain Res Bull*. 2008;75:619-28. DOI PubMed

28. van Leeuwen LM, Evans RJ, Jim KK, et al. A transgenic zebrafish model for the *in vivo* study of the blood and choroid plexus brain barriers using *claudin 5*. *Biol Open*. 2018;7. DOI PubMed PMC

29. Xie J, Farage E, Sugimoto M, Anand-Apte B. A novel transgenic zebrafish model for blood-brain and blood-retinal barrier development. *BMC Dev Biol*. 2010;10:76. DOI PubMed PMC

30. Nzou G, Wicks RT, Wicks EE, et al. Human cortex spheroid with a functional blood brain barrier for high-throughput neurotoxicity screening and disease modeling. *Sci Rep*. 2018;8:7413. DOI PubMed PMC

31. Vatine GD, Barrile R, Workman MJ, et al. Human iPSC-derived blood-brain barrier chips enable disease modeling and personalized medicine applications. *Cell Stem Cell*. 2019;24:995-1005.e6. DOI PubMed

32. Völkner M, Zschätzsch M, Rostovskaya M, et al. Retinal organoids from pluripotent stem cells efficiently recapitulate retinogenesis. *Stem Cell Reports*. 2016;6:525-38. DOI PubMed PMC

33. Buzas EI. The roles of extracellular vesicles in the immune system. *Nat Rev Immunol*. 2023;23:236-50. DOI PubMed PMC

34. van Niel G, D'Angelo G, Raposo G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. *Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol*. 2018;19:213-28. DOI PubMed

35. Budnik V, Ruiz-Cañada C, Wendler F. Extracellular vesicles round off communication in the nervous system. *Nat Rev Neurosci*. 2016;17:160-72. DOI PubMed PMC

36. Saint-Pol J, Gosselet F, Duban-Deweer S, Pottiez G, Karamanos Y. Targeting and crossing the blood-brain barrier with extracellular vesicles. *Cells*. 2020;9:851. DOI PubMed PMC

37. van Niel G, Carter DRF, Clayton A, Lambert DW, Raposo G, Vader P. Challenges and directions in studying cell-cell communication by extracellular vesicles. *Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol*. 2022;23:369-82. DOI PubMed

38. Mustapic M, Eitan E, Werner JK Jr, et al. Plasma extracellular vesicles enriched for neuronal origin: a potential window into brain pathologic processes. *Front Neurosci*. 2017;11:278. DOI PubMed PMC

39. Osti D, Del Bene M, Rappa G, et al. Clinical significance of extracellular vesicles in plasma from glioblastoma patients. *Clin Cancer Res*. 2019;25:266-76. DOI PubMed

40. Thompson AG, Gray E, Heman-Ackah SM, et al. Extracellular vesicles in neurodegenerative disease - pathogenesis to biomarkers. *Nat Rev Neurol*. 2016;12:346-57. DOI PubMed

41. Welton JL, Loveless S, Stone T, von Ruhland C, Robertson NP, Clayton A. Cerebrospinal fluid extracellular vesicle enrichment for protein biomarker discovery in neurological disease; multiple sclerosis. *J Extracell Vesicles*. 2017;6:1369805. DOI PubMed PMC

42. Nieland L, Mahjoum S, Grandell E, Breyne K, Breakefield XO. Engineered EVs designed to target diseases of the CNS. *J Control Release*. 2023;356:493-506. DOI PubMed PMC

43. Pauwels MJ, Vandendriessche C, Vandenbroucke RE. Special delEVery: extracellular vesicles as promising delivery platform to the
brain. *Biomedicines*. 2021;9:1734. DOI PubMed PMC

44. Bang OY, Kim JE. Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle therapy for acute brain insults and neurodegenerative diseases. *BMB Rep.* 2022;55:20-9. DOI PubMed PMC

45. Yavuz B, Mutlu EC, Ahmed Z, Ben-Nissan B, Stamboulis A. Applications of stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in nerve regeneration. *Int J Mol Sci.* 2024;25:5863. DOI PubMed PMC

46. Hosseinkhani B, Duran G, Hoeks C, et al. Cerebral microvascular endothelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles regulate blood-brain barrier function. *Fluids Barriers CNS*. 2023;20:95. DOI PubMed PMC

47. Lucero R, Zappulli V, Sammarco A, et al. Glioma-derived miRNA-containing extracellular vesicles induce angiogenesis by reprogramming brain endothelial cells. *Cell Rep.* 2020;30:2065-74.e4. DOI PubMed PMC

48. Tominaga N, Kosaka N, Ono M, et al. Brain metastatic cancer cells release microRNA-181c-containing extracellular vesicles capable of destructing blood-brain barrier. *Nat Commun.* 2015;6:6716. DOI PubMed PMC

49. Vandendriessche C, Balusu S, Van Cauwenberghe C, et al. Importance of extracellular vesicle secretion at the blood-cerebrospinal fluid interface in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. *Acta Neuropathol Commun.* 2021;9:143. DOI PubMed PMC

50. Xu B, Zhang Y, Du XF, et al. Neurons secrete miR-132-containing exosomes to regulate brain vascular integrity. *Cell Res.* 2017;27:882-97. DOI PubMed PMC

51. Chen CC, Liu L, Ma F, et al. Elucidation of exosome migration across the blood-brain barrier model *in vitro*. *Cell Mol Bioeng.* 2016;9:509-29. DOI PubMed PMC

52. Kuroda H, Tachikawa M, Yagi Y, et al. Cluster of differentiation 46 is the major receptor in human blood-brain barrier endothelial cells for uptake of exosomes derived from brain-metastatic melanoma cells (SK-Mel-28). *Mol Pharm.* 2019;16:292-304. DOI PubMed

53. Busatto S, Morad G, Guo P, Moses MA. The role of extracellular vesicles in the physiological and pathological regulation of the blood-brain barrier. *FASEB Bioadv.* 2021;3:665-75. DOI PubMed PMC

54. Counil H, Silva RO, Rabanel JM, et al. Brain penetration of peripheral extracellular vesicles from Alzheimer's patients and induction of microglia activation. *J Extracell Biol.* 2025;4:e70027. DOI PubMed PMC

55. Ridder K, Keller S, Dams M, et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated transfer of genetic information between the hematopoietic system and the brain in response to inflammation. *PLoS Biol.* 2014;12:e1001874. DOI PubMed PMC

56. Lötvall J, Hill AF, Hochberg F, et al. Minimal experimental requirements for definition of extracellular vesicles and their functions: a position statement from the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles. *J Extracell Vesicles*. 2014;3:26913. DOI PubMed PMC

57. Saint-Pol J, Culot M. Minimum information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV) as toolbox for rigorous, reproducible and homogeneous studies on extracellular vesicles. *Toxicol In Vitro*. 2025;106:106049. DOI PubMed

58. Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. *J Extracell Vesicles*. 2018;7:1535750. DOI PubMed PMC

59. Welsh JA, Goberdhan DCI, O'Driscoll L, et al; MISEV Consortium. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): from basic to advanced approaches. *J Extracell Vesicles*. 2024;13:e12404. DOI PubMed PMC

60. Dahlstroem C, Barezani J, Li J, et al. Mechanism of centrosomal protein 55 (CEP55) loading into exosomes. *J Extracell Vesicles*. 2025;14:e70046. DOI PubMed PMC

61. Duro MG, Tavares LA, Furtado IP, Saint-Pol J, D'Angelo G. Protrusion-derived extracellular vesicles (PD-EVs) and their diverse origins: key players in cellular communication, cancer progression, and T cell modulation. *Biol Cell*. 2025;117:e70018. DOI PubMed PMC

62. Morales-Prieto DM, Murrieta-Coxca JM, Stojiljkovic M, et al. Small extracellular vesicles from peripheral blood of aged mice pass the blood-brain barrier and induce glial cell activation. *Cells*. 2022;11:625. DOI PubMed PMC

63. Ramos-Zaldívar HM, Polakovicova I, Salas-Huenuleo E, et al. Extracellular vesicles through the blood-brain barrier: a review. *Fluids Barriers CNS*. 2022;19:60. DOI PubMed PMC

64. Wan Z, Liu T, Xu N, et al. PKH Dyes should be avoided in the EVs biodistribution study of the brain: a call for caution. *Int J Nanomedicine*. 2024;19:10885-98. DOI PubMed PMC

65. Roux Q, Van Deun J, Dedeyne S, Hendrix A. The EV-TRACK summary add-on: integration of experimental information in databases to ensure comprehensive interpretation of biological knowledge on extracellular vesicles. *J Extracell Vesicles*. 2020;9:1699367. DOI PubMed PMC

66. Deun J, Hendrix A; EV-TRACK consortium. Is your article EV-TRACKed? *J Extracell Vesicles*. 2017;6:1379835. DOI PubMed PMC

67. Clayton A, Boilard E, Buzas EI, et al. Considerations towards a roadmap for collection, handling and storage of blood extracellular vesicles. *J Extracell Vesicles*. 2019;8:1647027. DOI PubMed PMC

68. Lucien F, Gustafson D, Lenassi M, et al. MIBlood-EV: minimal information to enhance the quality and reproducibility of blood extracellular vesicle research. *J Extracell Vesicles*. 2023;12:e12385. DOI PubMed PMC

69. Sandau US, Magaña SM, Costa J, et al; International Society for Extracellular Vesicles Cerebrospinal Fluid Task Force. Recommendations for reproducibility of cerebrospinal fluid extracellular vesicle studies. *J Extracell Vesicles*. 2024;13:e12397. DOI PubMed PMC

70. Shekari F, Alibhai FJ, Baharvand H, et al. Cell culture-derived extracellular vesicles: considerations for reporting cell culturing parameters. *J Extracell Biol.* 2023;2:e115. DOI PubMed PMC

71. Cheng L, Hill AF. Therapeutically harnessing extracellular vesicles. *Nat Rev Drug Discov.* 2022;21:379-99. DOI PubMed