# Micronekton distributions and assemblages at two shallow seamounts of the south-western Indian Ocean: Insights from acoustics and mesopelagic trawl data

Pavanee Annasawmy, Jean-François Ternon, Pascal Cotel, Yves Cherel, Evgeny V. Romanov, Gildas Roudaut, Anne Lebourges-Dhaussy, Fréderic Ménard, Francis Marsac

► To cite this version:

Pavanee Annasawmy, Jean-François Ternon, Pascal Cotel, Yves Cherel, Evgeny V. Romanov, et al. Micronekton distributions and assemblages at two shallow seamounts of the south-western Indian Ocean: Insights from acoustics and mesopelagic trawl data. Progress in Oceanography, 2019, 178, 10.1016/j.pocean.2019.102161. insu-03668089

HAL Id: insu-03668089

https://insu.hal.science/insu-03668089v1

Submitted on 11 Aug 2025

**HAL** is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire **HAL**, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Micronekton distributions and assemblages at two shallow seamounts of the south-western Indian Ocean: Insights from acoustics and mesopelagic trawl data

Pavanee Annasawmy<fnref n="1" />, <fnref n="2" />*, Jean-François Ternon<fnref n="1" />, Pascal Cotel<fnref n="1" />, Yves Cherel<fnref n="3" />, Evgeny V. Romanov<fnref n="4" />, Gildas Roudaut<fnref n="5" />, Anne Lebourges-Dhaussy<fnref n="5" />, Fréderic Ménard<fnref n="6" />, Francis Marsac<fnref n="1" />, <fnref n="2" />

<footnote n="1">¹ MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Avenue Jean Monnet, CS 30171, 34203 Sète cedex, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Department of Biological Sciences and Marine Research Institute, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, Cape Town, South Africa</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR7372 du CNRS-Université de la Rochelle, 79360 Villiers-en-bois, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Centre technique d’appui à la pêche réunionnaise (CAP RUN)-NEXA, 97420 Le Port, Île de la Réunion, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵ Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR LEMAR 195 (UBO/CNRS/IRD), Campus Ifremer, BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, IRD, MIO, Marseille, France</footnote>

<footnote>* Corresponding author: angelee-pavanee.annasawmy@ird.fr</footnote>
1 Abstract

2 Micronekton distributions and assemblages were investigated at two shallow seamounts of
3 the south-western Indian Ocean using a combination of trawl data and multi-frequency
4 acoustic visualisation techniques. La Pérouse (~60 m) seamount is located on the outskirts of
5 the oligotrophic Indian South Subtropical Gyre province with weak mesoscale activities and
6 low primary productivity all year round. The “MAD-Ridge” seamount (thus termed in this
7 study; ~240 m) is located in the productive East African Coastal (EAFR) province with high
8 mesoscale activities to the south of Madagascar. This resulted in higher micronekton species
9 richness at MAD-Ridge compared to La Pérouse. Resulting productivity at MAD-Ridge
10 seamount was likely due to the action of mesoscale eddies advecting larvae and productivity
11 from the Madagascar shelf rather than local dynamic processes such as Taylor column
12 formation. Mean micronekton abundance/biomass, as estimated from mesopelagic trawl
13 catches, were lower over the summit compared to the vicinity of the seamounts, due to net
14 selectivity and catchability and depth gradient on micronekton assemblages. Mean acoustic
15 densities in the night shallow scattering layer (SSL: 10-200 m) over the summit were not
16 significantly different compared to the vicinity (within 14 nautical miles) of MAD-Ridge. At
17 La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge, the night and day SSL were dominated by common diel vertical
18 migrant and non-migrant micronekton species respectively. While seamount-associated
19 mesopelagic fishes such as *Diaphus suborbitalis* (La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge) and
20 *Benthosema fibulatum* performed diel vertical migrations (DVM) along the seamounts’
21 flanks, seamount-resident benthopelagic fishes, including *Cookeolus japonicus* (MAD-
22 Ridge), were aggregated over MAD-Ridge summit both during the day and night. Before
23 sunrise, mid-water migrants initiated the first vertical migration event from the intermediate
24 to the deep scattering layer (DSL, La Pérouse: 500-650m; MAD-Ridge: 400-700 m) or
25 deeper. During sunrise, the other taxa contributing to the night SSL exhibited a successive
26 series of vertical migration events from the surface to the DSL or deeper. Some scatterers
27 were blocked in their upward and downward migrations due to the seamount topography,
28 more commonly known as the sound scattering layer interception/topographic blockage
29 hypothesis. Possible mechanisms leading to the observed patterns in micronekton vertical and
30 horizontal distributions are discussed. This study contributes to a better understanding of how
31 seamounts influence the diel vertical migration, horizontal distribution and community
32 composition of micronekton and seamount-associated/resident species at two poorly studied
33 shallow topographic features in the south-western Indian Ocean.
34

Keywords: micronekton, seamount, south-western Indian Ocean, acoustics, seamount-associated fauna

35

36
## 1. Introduction

Seamounts are ubiquitous underwater topographic features, usually of volcanic origin, which rise steeply through the water column from abyssal depths. They exhibit various shapes (conical, circular, elliptical or elongated) with the summit reaching various depths below the sea surface. Shallow seamounts are those reaching into the euphotic zone. As topographic obstacles, seamounts may influence prevailing ocean currents by disrupting the oceanic flow and causing spatial and temporal variability in the current field (Royer, 1978; White et al., 2007). The combined interaction of various seamount characteristics, stratification and oceanic flow conditions may provide local dynamic responses at seamounts such as formation of a Taylor Column or Cone, isopycnal doming (Mohn & Beckmann, 2002), enclosed circulation cells and enhanced vertical mixing (White et al., 2007). The aforementioned physical processes may cause various responses over seamounts, notably, upwelling and vertical mixing of nutrient-rich waters from deeper to shallower layers and enhanced productivity (Boehlert & Genin, 1987; Genin, 2004). The enclosed, semi-enclosed circulation pattern around seamounts may also be important retention mechanisms for drifting organisms produced over, or advected from the far field into the vicinity of the seamount (White et al., 2007).

Seamounts are important for fisheries around the world since they aggregate large pelagic organisms of commercial value such as tunas (Fonteneau, 1991; Holland & Grubbs, 2007; Dubroca et al., 2013), alfonsinos and orange roughy (Ingole & Koslow, 2005; Bensch et al., 2009). In the southwestern Indian Ocean seamount-associated fisheries gradually developed since the early 1970s, targeting various species, including alfonsinos (*Beryx* sp.), rubyfish (*Plagiogeneion rubiginosus*), cardinalfish (*Epigonus* sp.), pelagic armourhead (*Pentaceros richardsoni*), rudderfish (*Centrolophus niger*), bluenose (*Hyperoglyphe antarctica*), and later expanded to orange roughy (*Hoplostethus atlanticus*) and oreos (Oreosomatidae) throughout
ridge systems of the southern Indian Ocean including Walters Shoal and deeper areas such as Madagascar and Mozambique ridges (Collette & Parin, 1991; Romanov, 2003; Clark et al., 2007; Parin et al., 2008; Rogers et al., 2017), Tunas are also subjected to fishing pressures at the Travin Bank, also known as the “Coco de Mer” (Indian Ocean), since its discovery in the late 1970s (Marsac et al., 2014). Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the high densities of marine megafauna associated with seamounts. La Pérouse seamount may present favourable breeding habitats for humpback whales (Dulau et al., 2017). Seamounts may provide navigation aids in fish movements and tunas may gather around these features to enhance the encounter rate with other con-specifics (Fréon & Dagorn, 2000) or they may be attracted by aggregations of prey (Holland & Grubbs, 2007; Morato et al., 2008). Organisms inhabiting the mesopelagic zone, the micronekton, represent an important forage fauna for top predators (Guinet et al., 1996; Cherel et al., 2010; Danckwerts et al., 2014; Jaquemet et al., 2014; Potier et al., 2004, 2007, 2014).

Micronekton can be divided into the broad taxonomic groups- crustaceans, cephalopods, fishes (Brodeur & Yamamura, 2005; De Forest & Drazen, 2009) and gelatinous organisms (Lehodey et al., 2010; Kloser et al., 2016). They typically range in size from 2-20 cm. They form dense sound-scattering layers since some of them reflect sound in the water, due to their swimbladders, hard shells and gas inclusions (Simmonds & MacLennan, 2005; Kloser et al., 2009). Different scatterers are expected to have different relative frequency responses (Benoit-Bird & Lawson, 2016). While organisms with gas-filled structures such as epimesopelagic fishes with gas-filled swimbladders and gelatinous organisms with pneumatophores dominate the 38 kHz frequency (Porteiro & Sutton, 2007; Kloser et al., 2002, 2009; 2016; Davison et al., 2015; Cascão et al., 2017; Proud et al., 2018), large crustaceans, small copepods, squids and non-gas bearing fishes are relatively weak scatterers at this frequency (Cascão et al., 2017; Proud et al., 2018). Euphausiid shrimps are better
targets at 70 kHz (Furusawa et al., 1994; Simmonds & MacLennan, 2005). Smaller plankton are stronger targets at 120 kHz compared to the 38 kHz and is a commonly used feature for separating plankton and fish marks on echograms (Simmonds & MacLennan, 2005).

Some micronekton taxa undergo diel vertical migration (DVM) from deep to shallow layers (upper 200 m) at dusk and from shallow to deep layers (below 400 m) at dawn (Lebourges-Dhaussy et al., 2000; Béhagle et al., 2014; Annasawmy et al., 2018). Other taxa were shown to exhibit delayed migration (Watanabe et al., 2002), reverse migration (Alverson, 1961; Gjosaeter, 1978, 1984; Marchal & Lebourges-Dhaussy, 1996; Lebourges-Dhaussy, 2000; Annasawmy et al., 2019c), mid-water migration or non-migration (Annasawmy et al., 2018).

It is thought that the spatial/horizontal distribution of micronekton communities is also not uniform across the Atlantic (Judkins & Haedrich, 2018) and south-western Indian Ocean (Annasawmy et al., 2018). Various physical processes such as mesoscale eddies, proximity to continental shelves and landmasses, and seamounts may influence micronekton's distributions (Annasawmy et al., 2019c). Seamounts, by introducing irregularities into the pelagic environment, such as a hard substrate, disrupted current flows, increased primary productivity, entrapment of plankton, and presence of benthic predators, are thought to influence the abundance, biomass, diversity and taxonomic composition of micronekton (Genin 2004; Wilson & Boehlert, 2004; De Forest & Drazen, 2009).

Although seamounts in other ocean basins are hypothesized to have a general influence on mesopelagic communities (De Forest & Drazen, 2009; Tracey et al., 2012), little is known about the micronekton dynamics at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts, two shallow topographic features of the south-western Indian Ocean. La Pérouse is located 90 nautical miles (nmi) to the North West of Reunion Island (Fig. 1a; Fig. 2), on the outskirts of the oligotrophic Indian South Subtropical Gyre Province (ISSG) (Longhurst, 2007). The summit depth is ~ 60m below the sea surface and is 10 km long with narrow and steep flanks. MAD-
Ridge seamount (thus termed in this study) is located along the Madagascar Ridge, 130 nmi to the South of Madagascar (Fig. 1b; Fig. 2). The summit depth is 240 m below the surface and is 33 km long (North to South) and 22 km wide (East to West). MAD-Ridge is located within an “eddy-corridor” along the Fort Dauphin upwelling area and is frequently crossed by mesoscale eddies spinning off the South East Madagascar Current (Pollard & Read, 2015; Vianello et al., 2019). These eddies may become trapped over the seamount and have an influence on the assemblages and DVM patterns of micronekton communities (Annasawmy et al., 2019c).

The main objectives of this study are to investigate (1) the prevailing environmental conditions at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts using satellite data, (3) the vertical and horizontal distributions of the scattering layers at MAD-Ridge using acoustic data, (2) the micronekton assemblages at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge using trawl data, and (4) whether La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge summits aggregate higher biomasses/densities of micronekton compared to the immediate vicinity of the seamounts, using acoustic and trawl data.

## 2. Methods

### 2.1 Study area and scientific cruises

La Pérouse cruise (DOI: 10.17600/16004500) was carried at latitude 19°43'S and longitude 54°10'E on board the R.V. ANTEA from the 15th to the 30th of September 2016, departing from/returning to Reunion Island (Fig. 1a). MAD-Ridge cruise (DOI: 10.17600/16004800 and 10.17600/16004900) was divided into two legs: leg 1 from Reunion Island to Fort Dauphin (Madagascar) from the 8th to the 24th of November 2016, and leg 2 from Fort Dauphin (Madagascar) to Durban (South Africa) from the 26th of November to the 14th of December 2016. MAD-Ridge seamount (latitude 27°28.38'S and longitude 46°15.67'E), was
sampled for acoustics and trawling during leg 2 of this cruise on board the R.V. ANTEA (Fig. 1b).

## 2.2 Satellite monitoring of La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts

Delayed-time mean sea level anomalies (MSLAs) at a daily and 1/4° resolution, produced and distributed by the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service project (CMEMS) and available at http://marine.copernicus.eu/, were used to describe the mesoscale eddy field at the time of La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge cruises. Sea surface chlorophyll (SSC) data, with a daily and 4.5 km resolution was downloaded from the MODIS sensor (http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov) and was used to calculate 5-day averages to obtain a proxy of surface oceanic primary production. Monthly mean chlorophyll a concentrations for the defined regions (La Pérouse: 18.5°-20°S/53°-55°E; MAD-Ridge: 27°-28°S/44°-48°E; Fig. 2c) were averaged from January to December 2016 to investigate the annual variability in chlorophyll a concentration/productivity.

## 2.3 Acoustic surveys

Acoustic surveys were carried out with a Simrad EK60 echosounder operating at four frequencies during both cruises: 38 kHz (750 m of acquired range), 70 kHz (500 m), 120 kHz (250 m) and 200 kHz (150 m). The transducers were calibrated prior to the cruises following the procedures recommended in Foote et al. (1987). The pulse duration was set at 0.512 ms and the transmitted power at 1000 W (38 kHz), 750 W (70 kHz), 200 W (120 kHz) and 90 W (200 kHz) during data acquisition periods. The water column was correctly sampled to a depth of 750 m during data acquisition for the 38 kHz frequency. La Pérouse acoustic data were intermittently recorded during transits and few mesopelagic trawl stations. The acoustic transects during MAD-Ridge transit periods were petal-shaped (Petals I-VII, see Fig. 3a), starting from the seamount summit either at sunset between 3:48pm and 4:10pm Universal
159 Time (Petals I-II) or at night between 6:13pm and 7:20pm Universal Time (Petals III-VII) till
160 the next morning between 05:38am and 06:29am (see Fig. 3b-h).

161 Acoustic data were processed with the Matecho software (an open source IRD tool computed
162 with MATLAB 7.11.0.184, Release 2010b- and based on the Ifremer's Movies3D software;
163 Trenkel et al., 2009; Perrot et al., 2018). Acoustic data sampled during transit (~ 8-9 knots)
164 and trawl stations (~ 2-3 knots) were processed and echo-integrated separately, with different
165 parameters to account for the differing ship speed. Transient (multiple pings) and background
166 noises, bottom echoes and attenuated signals were removed using the algorithms designed by
167 De Robertis & Higginbottom (2007) and Ryan et al. (2015). The first 10 m below the sea
168 surface was removed to account for the presence and over amplification of the signal due to
169 surface bubbles. Echo-integrations of acoustic data were performed on 1-m layers at a
170 threshold of -80 dB to exclude scatterers not representative of the micronekton community
171 (Béhagle et al., 2017). The echo-integration cell size was fixed at 0.1 nmi during transit
172 periods and at 10 pings during trawl stations. The volume backscattering strength (Sv, dB re
173 1 m⁻¹, MacLennan et al., 2002) was calculated to obtain the relative acoustic densities of
174 scatterers per unit volume. The water column was separated into three depth categories, based
175 on epi-mesopelagic layers: surface/shallow (10-200 m), intermediate (200-400 m) and deep
176 (400-750 m).

177 Red Green Blue (RGB) composite images were generated in MATLAB (version 2016), based
178 on the 38, 70 and 120 kHz MAD-Ridge echo-integrated acoustic data. This acoustic
179 visualisation technique is useful in determining the relative contribution of each frequency to
180 the overall backscatter, in identifying the different scattering layers and identifying dense
181 micronekton aggregations. It is used to enhance and colour-code sample volumes with similar
182 acoustic features. The 38, 70 and 120 kHz echo-integrated acoustic data were given in red,
183 green and blue colour codes respectively on each RGB plot, with the dynamic of the Sv
184

values for each frequency being converted in 256 levels of each colour. A linear
transformation of the backscatter was applied for each frequency:

185

186

Color index (0 to 255) = [255 / (High scale threshold - Low scale threshold)] x [Sv (fr) - Low scale threshold], whereby

187

188

the high scale threshold is the maximum backscatter for hue visualisation, the low scale
threshold is the minimum backscatter for hue visualisation and Sv (fr) is the backscatter value
at frequency (fr) which can be the 38 kHz/70 kHz/120 kHz frequency.

189

190

191

In the resulting RGB composite, the “hue” gives the frequency with the highest backscatter.

192

On an RGB composite image based on the 38, 70 and 120 kHz echo-integrated acoustic data and given in red, green and blue color codes respectively, a dark red colour indicates a dominant but low 38 kHz backscatter, whereas a light red colour indicates a dominant and high 38 kHz backscatter. The same rule applies to the blue (70 kHz) and green (120 kHz) hues. A black dominating hue on the RGB plot indicates that all backscatters are under the low scale threshold of -80 dB whereas a white dominating colour indicates that all backscatters are close to the high scale threshold of -50 dB.

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

2.4 Net sampling

200

Ten epi-mesopelagic tows were performed at La Pérouse and 17 tows at MAD-Ridge (Table 1; Fig. 1a and 1b). Trawl MZC was carried in the Mozambique Channel (Fig. 1) and will be used as reference for open-water trawls compared to trawls 1-17 carried at MAD-Ridge seamount. A 40m long International Young Gadoid Pelagic Trawl (IYGPT) was used, having an 80 mm knotless nylon delta mesh netting at the front tapering and 5 mm at the codend and a mouth opening of ~ 96 m². The trawl was towed at a ship speed of 2-3 knots at the targeted depth for 60 minutes during La Pérouse cruise and 30 minutes during MAD-Ridge cruise.
During both cruises, the sampling depth was that of the sound scattering layer in that ship

201

202

203

204

205

206

207
position and at that time of day, with no rigid plan of sampling preselected depths. Trawl
depth was monitored with a Scanmar depth sensor during both cruises. The total volume of
water filtered by the net tows was calculated by multiplying the distance travelled during the
tows by the area of the trawl mouth opening to account for the differing sampling durations
during the cruises. The total volume of water filtered during La Pérouse ranged from 379 408
m³ to 871 181 m³, and from 154 086 m³ to 312 321 m³ during MAD-Ridge. Trawl stations
were further classified into the categories summit, flank and vicinity according to whether
they occurred on the summit plateaus of the seamounts, on the slopes or in the vicinity of the
seamounts (i.e. any trawl not carried out on the summit and flanks) (Table 1.0).

The micronekton organisms collected during both cruises were sorted on board, divided into four broad categories: gelatinous organisms, crustaceans, cephalopods and fishes. The wet mass (WM) in grams was recorded for each category. Total length of selected gelatinous organisms, abdomen and carapace length of selected crustaceans, dorsal mantle length of selected cephalopods and standard length of fishes were measured. The micronekton components were counted and identified to the lowest possible taxon on board and also onshore from frozen samples preserved at -20°C. The total micronekton abundance estimates were calculated by dividing the total number of individuals per trawl by the volume of water filtered and multiplying by the average thickness of the day/night backscattering layer (100 m) and expressed as abundance within the backscattering layer (ind. m⁻²) (as in Kwong et al., 2018). Similarly, the total biomass of organisms collected per trawl (g WM m⁻²) was calculated by dividing the total wet mass (WM g) of micronekton broad categories per trawl by the volume of water filtered and multiplying by the average thickness of the day/night backscattering layer (100 m). The habitat ranges of available micronekton taxa were obtained from literature (Clarke & Lu, 1975; Pearcy et al., 1977; Smith & Heemstra, 1986; Van der Spoel & Bleeker, 1991; Brodeur & Yamamura, 2005; Davison et al., 2015; Romero-Romero
233

et al., 2019). Detailed fish species size distributions and compositions from both La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge cruises are described in Cherel et al. (2019). Detailed habitat and size ranges, and trophic positions of selected micronekton taxa are given in Annasawmy et al. (2019a).

234

235

236

237

## 2.5 Data visualization and statistical analyses

238

La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamount bathymetry data were acquired with the 12 kHz frequency of a Simrad EA 500 echosounder and the 38 kHz of the Simrad EK60 echosounder. The bathymetry data were interpolated on a regular grid using the software Surfer Version 10.3.705. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed to investigate the differences in mesopelagic trawl abundance and biomass estimates between La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge and the mean acoustic densities over the summit and vicinity of MAD-Ridge.

239

240

241

242

243

244

Micronekton species richness was calculated using R (3.3.1) vegan package (2.5-1, Oksanen et al., 2018). The PRIMER v6 software was used to perform multivariate analyses according to Clarke & Warwick (2001) on La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge micronekton abundance datasets to test for the effects of depth, trawl location and time of day on micronekton abundance and to identify the shallow-dwelling/deep-dwelling and seamount-associated/resident fauna. The fourth root transformation was used on species abundance data to down-weight strongly abundant species, thus allowing rare species to exert some influence on the similarity calculation (Clarke & Warwick, 2001). Resemblance matrices were created from the Bray-Curtis measure of similarity and were used to run the SIMPROF (similarity profile) permutation testing to identify statistically significant cluster of samples. Non-metric dimensional scaling (MDS) were used to produce 2-dimensional ordination of samples according to the selected grouping variables Depth category, Trawl location and Time of day. Bubble plots were overlaid on the MDS ordination diagrams to represent the relative

245

246

247

248

249

250

251

252

253

254

255

256
abundance of the selected species per trawl station (plotted at the bubble centres). The larger
the bubble, the greater the mean number of individuals were captured at that site. One-way
ANOSIM (analysis of similarities) was calculated to test for significant differences in the
micronekton community composition according to the factors Depth, Trawl location and
Time of Day. The SIMPER (similarity percentages) analysis was carried out to identify the
taxa contributing most to the similarities/dissimilarities within each resultant cluster group.

263 **3. Results**

264 3.1 Prevailing environmental conditions at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts

265
During La Pérouse cruise in September 2016, the seamount was under the influence of a
266
weak cyclonic eddy with a MSLA of ~ -10 cm (Fig. 2a). MAD-Ridge was under the
267
influence of an eddy dipole with the anticyclonic feature being trapped on the seamount
268
during the cruise in November 2016 (Fig. 2b). The MSLA at MAD-Ridge was ~10 cm (eddy
269
periphery) to 40 cm (core of the anticyclone) during leg 1 of the cruise. The annual primary
270
productivity, derived from satellite observations, followed the same pattern in both regions of
271
La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts, with maximum values reached in July, as a result of
272
an intense mixing caused by the austral winter trade winds, and minimum values observed
273
during austral summer (January-March and November-December) (Fig. 2c). Both La Pérouse
274
and MAD-Ridge cruises took place during a decreasing trend of oceanic productivity.
275
Although, the annual mean chlorophyll a concentration depicted the same cycle at both
276
seamounts, chlorophyll a concentrations at MAD-Ridge were twice higher than at La Pérouse
277
all year round.

278 3.2 Vertical and horizontal distributions of biological scatterers at MAD-Ridge

279
The highest mean acoustic densities (Sv) of the 38 kHz frequency were observed at night in
280
the surface layer (10-200 m) across all petals (I-VII) at MAD-Ridge (Fig. 3a-h). The mean
281 acoustic densities in the surface layer showed a decreasing trend at sunrise and during day
282 time (Petals I to VII, Fig. 3b-h) while gradually increasing in the deep layer across petals II to
283 VI (Fig. 3c-g). The intermediate layer showed the lowest acoustic densities compared to the
284 surface and deep layers, although a peak can be observed during sunrise when organisms
285 vertically migrated towards deeper layers. A peak in day time acoustic densities in the deep
286 layer can be observed across petals II and IV (Fig. 3c and 3e) over the seamount flanks,
287 which can be attributed to topographic blockage of biological scatterers (Fig. 4a, b and c).

288 Echograms of the 38 kHz frequency showed organisms migrating from below 400 m (deep)
289 to above 200 m (surface) at dusk across Petal II (Fig. 4a). Biological scatterers were also
290 shown to perform a successive series of DVM events from the intermediate/surface layers to
291 deeper layers before sunrise and during sunrise, reaching the DSL before day time (Fig. 4a, b
292 and c). Across petals IV, an increase in the mean acoustic densities in the day time DSL can
293 be observed (Fig. 3e), indicating a likely downward migratory trend of the biological
294 scatterers to deeper layers and blockage and/or preferential association of some micronekton
295 taxa with the flanks of MAD-Ridge seamount (Fig. 4c). A dense SSL between ~10-200 m
296 and a DSL between ~400-700 m were observed throughout the night during MAD-Ridge
297 cruise (Fig. 4a, b and c). After vertical migration of scatterers to deeper depths at dawn, the
298 day SSL became less dense (compared to the night SSL) and persisted in the top 100 m of the
299 water column. Biological scatterers were associated with MAD-Ridge seamount summit and
300 flanks both during night time and day time.

301 To investigate the influence of MAD-Ridge summit, the mean night time acoustic densities of
302 the 38 kHz frequency between 10-250 m over the summit and at the seamount vicinity
303 (within 14 nmi from the summit) were investigated along petals III-VII (Fig. 5a, b and c).
304 Petals I and II were discarded since these transects were incomplete, not being carried from
305 the summit. The mean acoustic densities between the summit and vicinity of MAD-Ridge
306

seamount were not statistically different (W=43610, p > 0.05). The highest acoustic
responses to the 38 kHz frequency in the surface layer (10-250 m) at night can be observed
across Petals IV and V, while Petal VI exhibited the lowest acoustic responses (Fig. 5b).

307

308

309

RGB composites of the 38, 70 and 120 kHz frequencies across petals III-VII showed distinct
scattering layers in the top 150 m of the water column, with some scatterers being strong
targets at the 38 kHz frequency and others at the 70 kHz frequency (Fig. 5c). The peak in
acoustic densities at 0.1 nmi across petal IV (Fig. 5b) may be attributed to the relatively high
Sv at ~250 m (i.e. below the night SSL) on the seamount summit. Patches of relatively high
Sv (seen as “white patches”) can be observed on the seamount summit across petals IV, V
and VII (Fig. 5c).

310

311

312

313

314

315

316

## 3.3 Taxonomic composition of trawl catches

317

At La Pérouse seamount, 147 taxa from 10 trawls representing 7, 16, 17 and 107 taxonomic
groups of gelatinous organisms, crustaceans, cephalopods and epi-mesopelagic fishes,
respectively, were collected. At MAD-Ridge, 149 taxa from 17 trawls, representing 5, 13, 17
and 114 taxonomic groups of gelatinous organisms, crustaceans, cephalopods and epi-
mesopelagic fishes, respectively, were collected. Six individuals of the benthopelagic fish
species, *Cookeolus japonicus*, were further collected at MAD-Ridge seamount summit (Fig.
8d, 9b and 10c). MAD-Ridge and La Pérouse trawls caught 3, 12, 14 and 66 identical taxa of
gelatinous organisms (jellyfish, salps and pyrosomes), crustaceans, cephalopods and epi-
mesopelagic fishes respectively.

318

319

320

321

322

323

324

325

326

Micronekton abundance and biomass estimates were greater at MAD-Ridge compared to La Pérouse (Fig. 6a), however, values were not significantly different (Abundance: W= 144.5, p > 0.05; Biomass: W=115, p > 0.05). Mean micronekton abundance and biomass estimates were lower over La Perouse summit (0.004 ind m⁻² and 0.006 g WM m⁻²) compared to the

327

328

329
vicinity (0.15 ± 0.11 ind m⁻² and 0.26 ± 0.18 g WM m⁻²). At MAD-Ridge, the summit also recorded lower abundance and biomass estimates (0.03 ind m⁻² and 0.11 g WM m⁻²) compared to the vicinity (0.33 ± 0.43 ind m⁻² and 0.46 ± 0.22 g WM m⁻²). The species richness was higher at MAD-Ridge (maximum species richness of 155) compared to La Pérouse (138), with the probability of encountering new or rare species with increasing fishing effort being higher at MAD-Ridge (Fig. 6b). The length distributions of organisms captured during both La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge were heavily skewed towards smaller sizes. Most of the micronekton captured were less than 100 mm (Fig. 6c), except for a few larger nektonic squid and fish species such as Cranchiidae sp. (339 mm- mantle length) and Nemichthyidae (614mm- standard length) during La Pérouse and the gelatinous *Salpa* sp. (207 mm- total length), squid *Ommastrephes bartramii* (490 mm- mantle length) and fish Nemichthyidae (446 mm) during MAD-Ridge.

Multivariate analysis of the taxa collected at La Pérouse seamount indicated that the sampling depth and trawl location were significant factors influencing micronekton community composition (ANOSIM, sampling depth: R= 0.38, p < 0.05; trawl location: R= 0.52, p < 0.05), while there was no significant effect of the time of day probably due to the low daytime fishing effort (ANOSIM, R= 0.846, p > 0.05). The assemblages from the deepest (400-600 m) and shallowest (0-110m) depth categories (SIMPER, average dissimilarity= 69.1%) and those from the vicinity and seamount summit (SIMPER, average dissimilarity= 81.0%) were the most dissimilar, while those from the intermediate and deep categories were the least dissimilar (SIMPER, average dissimilarity= 58.3%). A main cluster at 40% similarity helped differentiate the night shallow, intermediate and deep tows carried at the flank and vicinity from the day trawl carried at the summit of La Pérouse (Fig. 7a).

The day shallow trawl over La Pérouse summit sampled a greater percentage abundance and biomass of gelatinous organisms, crustaceans and fishes (Fig. 7b). Cephalopods were caught
355

most abundantly and in greater biomass during the night shallow trawls compared to the night
deep, intermediate and day shallow trawls (Fig. 7b and 9a). Crustaceans were caught in all
trawls at La Pérouse seamount (Fig. 7b) except the meso-bathypelagic crustacean *Pasiphaea*
sp. and *Neognathophausia* which were caught in night deep and intermediate trawls only at
the vicinity of the seamount as shown by bubble plot overlays of the MDS ordination (Fig.
7c). The sternoptychid *Argyropelecus aculeatus* and *Argyropelecus hemigymnus* were absent
from the shallow trawls and were caught either in the intermediate and/or deep trawls at La
Pérouse flanks and vicinity (Fig. 7c and 9a). The myctophid fish *Diaphus suborbitalis* was
caught in high numbers, both in shallow and deep layers, on the flanks of La Pérouse
seamount at night. La Pérouse flanks also hosted four individuals of the sternoptychid
*Argyripnus hulleyi* in the deep layer at night (Fig. 7d and 9a).

356

357

358

359

360

361

362

363

364

365

366

At MAD-Ridge, sampling depth, time of day and trawl location were significant factors
influencing the micronekton community composition as shown by multivariate analyses of
the micronekton taxa and species abundance data (Effect of sampling depth: ANOSIM, R=
0.351, p < 0.05; Effect of time of day: ANOSIM, R=0.369, p < 0.05; Effect of trawl location:
ANOSIM, R=0.205, p < 0.05). A main cluster at 35% similarity confirmed a depth gradient
in community composition in shallow and deep layers (Fig. 8a). Clusters at 30% similarity
helped differentiate samples collected during night shallow tows at the seamount summit and
flanks from all other tows carried out during the cruise. The micronekton assemblages from
the deepest (440-550 m) and shallowest (0-210m) depth categories were the most dissimilar
(SIMPER, average dissimilarity= 69.9%; ANOSIM, R= 0.477, p < 0.05) and those from the
intermediate and deep categories were the least dissimilar (SIMPER, average dissimilarity=
50.8%; ANOSIM, R=-0.333, R > 0.05).

367

368

369

370

371

372

373

374

375

376

377

378

The majority of crustacean species were caught across all trawls (Fig. 8b), except *Pasiphaea*
sp. caught in night deep trawls only (Fig. 9b). Cephalopods were caught most abundantly and

379
in greater biomasses in the shallow trawls compared to the intermediate and deep trawls (Fig. 8b and 9b). Gelatinous organisms and fishes were abundantly caught across all trawls in the shallow, intermediate and deep layers and at MAD-Ridge seamount summit, flanks and vicinity (Fig. 8b). Juveniles of the reef-associated epipelagic fish Acanthuridae sp. was abundantly caught in night shallow trawls at the vicinity of MAD-Ridge seamount and not in the deep trawls (Fig. 8c and 9b). The vertical migrant *Ceratoscopelus warmingii* (Myctophidae) was abundantly caught in the shallow, intermediate and deep layers at the flanks and seamount vicinity (Fig. 8c and 9b). The fish *Cyclothone* sp. (Gonostomatidae) and *A. aculeatus* (Sternoptychidae) were absent from the shallow trawls during MAD-Ridge cruise (Fig. 8d and 9b). MAD-Ridge seamount attracted the mesopelagic fishes *D. suborbitalis*, *Benthosema fibulatum*, *Diaphus knappi* and *Neoscopelus macrolepidotus* (Fig. 8e). The summit also consisted of the apparently settled population of the benthopelagic *C. japonicus* as shown by bubble plot overlays of the MDS ordination (Fig. 8e).

3.4 Micronekton community compositions and acoustic backscatter intensities

At La Pérouse seamount, the gelatinous plankton *Pyrosoma* sp. and salps, the crustacean *Natantia* sp., phyllosoma larvae, the squid *Abraliopsis* sp., leptocephali larvae and the fish *C. warmingii* were caught across almost all trawls in the night SSL and DSL over the flanks and vicinity of the seamount (Fig. 9a). At MAD-Ridge seamount, *Pyrosoma* sp., salps, phyllosoma larvae, *Abraliopsis* sp. and the squid *Enoploteuthidae* sp. were caught across almost all trawls in the day and night SSL, DSL and intermediate layer over the summit, flanks and vicinity of the seamount (Fig. 9b). The myctophid fish *Hygophum hygomii* was abundantly caught over the summit, flanks and in the vicinity of MAD-Ridge (Fig. 9b). Since the IYGPT net had no closing device, shallow water species might have contributed to the catch in deeper trawls as the net was lowered and retrieved.
The backscatter intensity within the day SSL between 10-100 m over La Pérouse summit was lower compared to MAD-Ridge summit (Fig. 9a and b). Over La Pérouse summit, the day SSL consisted of a greater percentage abundance and biomass of gelatinous organisms including various types of jellyfishes, salps, and the siphonophore Diphyidae along with three leptocephali larvae and one juvenile of *Chaetodon* sp. (9a). The night SSL during La Pérouse cruise extended from the surface to 200 m. Over La Pérouse flanks, the night SSL consisted of high numbers of the crustacean Natantia sp. and the meso-bathypelagic squid *Abraliopsis* sp. and lower numbers of the cephalopods Cranchiidae sp., Oegopsida sp., *Abralia* sp., and Octopoda sp., and epi-, meso- and bathypelagic fishes of the Gonostomatidae, Malacosteidae, Myctophidae, Paralepididae and Synodontidae families. The night SSL in the vicinity of La Pérouse included similar specimens as those sampled over the flanks, such as *Pyrosoma* sp., jellyfishes, salps, Natantia sp., phyllosoma larvae, *Abraliopsis* sp., Cranchiidae sp., and Octopoda sp., and various types of fishes of the Myctophidae family.

The DSL over the flanks and vicinity of La Pérouse was less dense at night time compared to day time and was located between 500-650 m compared to MAD-Ridge (400-700 m) (Fig. 9a). The night deep trawls over La Pérouse flanks consisted of the seamount-associated fish *D. suborbitalis* in high numbers, the deep-dwelling *A. aculeatus*, the fish *A. hulleyi* (also see Cherel et al., 2019), and a variety of crustaceans and gelatinous plankton in lower numbers (Fig. 9a). *D. suborbitalis* were caught within the night SSL over the flanks of La Pérouse but not in the vicinity of the seamount. The night deep tows in the vicinity of La Pérouse consisted of the crustaceans Oplophoridae sp., Natantia sp., Sergestidae sp., Caridea sp., *Phronima* sp., *Funchalia* sp., *Pasiphaea* sp., and *Neognathophausia* sp., the cephalopods *Abraliopsis* sp. and Octopoda sp., the non-migrating fishes *A. aculeatus* and *A. hemigymnus* and diel vertically migrating and mid-water migrating fishes of the Gonostomatidae, Melanostomiidae, Myctophidae, Stomiidae, Paralepididae, Scorpaenidae and Phosichthyidae
families. Mid-water migrants showed earlier vertical migration from the intermediate to deeper layers at the end of the night, as shown by the echogram of the 38 kHz frequency. The majority of micronekton organisms however, migrated from the SSL to the DSL or deeper during sunrise in a successive series of migration events and contributed to the intensification of the backscatter within the DSL during day time. Micronekton taxa may be blocked by La Pérouse seamount in their upward migration as shown by the echogram of the 38 kHz frequency.

The night SSL over MAD-Ridge summit consisted of the gelatinous plankton salps and *Pyrosoma* sp., crustaceans Oplophoridae sp., and Natantia sp., squids Enoploteuthidae sp., *Ornithoteuthis volatilis*, *Abraliopsis* sp., and Onychoteuthidae sp., and a range of diel vertically migrating fishes of the Myctophidae, Nomeidae and Melanostomiidae families (Fig. 9b). Few individuals of the slope-associated benthopelagic fish *C. japonicus* and juveniles of the reef-associated fish *Chaetodon* sp. were collected within the night SSL over MAD-Ridge summit. The night SSL over the flanks of MAD-Ridge consisted of the crustaceans Oplophoridae sp., Sergestidae sp., *Funchalia* sp., *Euphausiacea* sp. and *Phronima* sp., squids including Ommastrephidae sp., mesopelagic fishes and high numbers of gelatinous plankton. *D. suborbitalis* were sampled in high numbers within the night SSL over the flanks and in lower numbers within the day deep tow over the flanks and in the vicinity of the seamount.

The day SSL over MAD-Ridge flanks comprised squids such as *Cranchia scabra*, *Abraliopsis* sp., Enoploteuthidae sp., and fishes such as Nemichthyidae sp., Paralepididae sp. and leptocephali. The day deep tows on the flanks and in the vicinity of MAD-Ridge consisted of a range of crustaceans and migrating fish species of the Gonostomatidae, Myctophidae, Chauliodonthidae and Photichthyidae families commonly found in deeper layers during day time. Day and night deep tows over the flanks and seamount vicinity
454

consisted of the non-migrating fishes *A. aculeatus*, *A. hemigymnus*, *Cyclothone* sp.

455

Echograms of the 38 kHz frequency showed high backscatter intensities over the summit and

456

flanks of MAD-Ridge during night time and day time due to the presence of seamount

457

summit and flank-associated/resident species. Before sunset at MAD-Ridge vicinity, the DSL

458

was intensified and scatterers began streaming vertically upwards. A dense night SSL was

459

formed within the first 200 m of the water column. Some micronekton species started their

460

vertical migration from the DSL or deeper towards the SSL before sunset, other species

461

during sunset and at night time.

462

RGB composite images were analysed in conjunction with data of trawls #14, 15 and 16 to

463

determine the acoustic responses of the micronekton captured and to make inferences about

464

micronekton behaviour at the seamount summit as opposed to the South Mozambique

465

Channel (trawl #21) (Fig. 10). Trawls on the seamount summit predominantly sampled dense

466

aggregations of organisms (seen as “white patches” on RGB composites), being strong

467

targets to the 38, 70 and 120 kHz frequencies, and having a relatively flat response to all

468

three frequencies (Fig. 10a and c). These trawls predominantly sampled the swimbladdered

469

myctophid fishes *D. suborbitalis* and *B. fibulatum* over MAD-Ridge flanks (Fig. 10a), the

470

mesopelagic fishes *H. hygomii* and *N. macrolepidotus*, and the benthopelagic fish *C.*

471

*japonicus* over the summit (Fig. 10c). Trawl #15 sampled a greater number of the gelatinous,

472

*Pyrosoma* sp. which are strong targets at the 38 kHz frequency within the night SSL (Fig.

473

10b). Trawl #21 predominantly sampled organisms being strong targets at the 38 kHz

474

frequency, with the fish *H. hygomii*, the squid *Enoploteuthidae* sp., the gelatinous *Pyrosoma*

475

sp. and the crustaceans *Oplophoridae* sp. being most abundantly caught (Fig. 10d). No dense

476

aggregations (“white patches”) were observed on RGB composites of trawl #21, as opposed

477

to trawls over the seamount summit and flanks of MAD-Ridge. Organisms were more likely
478

dispersed in the water column in the Mozambique Channel as opposed to the seamount summit and flanks where they formed dense aggregations.

479

480

481

# 4. Discussion

482

## 4.1 Sampling biases and constraints

483

484

485

486

487

488

489

490

491

492

493

494

495

496

497

498

499

500

501

Pelagic trawls like the IYGPT have coarse meshes at the front through which an unknown fraction of mesopelagic organisms may escape (Kaartvedt et al., 2012). Highly mobile micronekton such as cephalopods and fishes may show avoidance reactions to nets which may lead to discrepancies between net-based and acoustic estimates (Reid, 1991; Kaartvedt et al., 2012). Organisms with fragile bodies, such as gelatinous plankton, may break apart, biasing final abundance/biomass estimates (Domokos et al., 2010; Rogers et al., 2017; Proud et al., 2018). La Pérouse acoustic data at sampling stations were incomplete and hence a thorough comparison in mean backscatter between La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge could not be carried out. Owing to bad quality acoustic data beyond 750 m, echo-integrations were limited to that depth. Biases in acoustic density estimates may arise from variations in fish swimbladder volume (that depends on the depth range and subsequent swimbladder compression), the swimbladder size distribution and aspect (Benoit-Bird & Lawson, 2016; Cascão et al., 2017; Proud et al., 2018). Some organisms also have low acoustic target strengths and hence low acoustic backscatter even if found in dense aggregations on seamounts (McClatchie & Combs, 2005). The RGB visualisation technique is color-vision dependent but however, provides information on the mean backscatter at all three frequencies on a single plot at high resolution compared to a single frequency echogram. Studies have demonstrated a seasonal effect in the variability of micronekton acoustic densities (Wilson & Boehlert, 2004; Cascão et al. 2017) owing to the life strategies and behaviour of the
502

seamount-associated fauna. This study therefore, only provided a snapshot in time of the
composition of micronekton at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge during a declining phase of
oceanic productivity.

503

504

505

## 4.2 Oceanography and biological response

506

This study highlighted contrasting environmental patterns at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge. While MAD-Ridge was under the influence of strong cyclonic and anticyclonic eddies originating from the South East Madagascar current, La Pérouse was under the influence of moderate mesoscale activities. As topographic obstacles, seamounts may either bifurcate, trap, split or destroy eddies (Schouten et al., 2000; Herbette et al., 2003; Adduce & Cenedese, 2004; Sutyrin, 2006; Lavelle & Mohn, 2010). Trapping duration of eddies may last several months, with important estimated effects on biological production and plankton retention (Bograd et al., 1997). Eddies are well known in influencing local water properties, such as the trapping of anomalous water masses (Swart et al., 2010; Pollard & Read, 2015), or the advection of coastal waters with high phytoplankton biomass from the coast to open waters (Quartly & Srokosz, 2004; Tew-Kai & Marsac, 2009; Kolasinski et al., 2012). Coastally upwelled waters of high biological productivity over the southern Madagascar shelf (Ramanantsoa et al., 2018) may be trapped by mesoscale features that propagate over MAD-Ridge (Annasawmy et al., 2019c).

507

508

509

510

511

512

513

514

515

516

517

518

519

520

Local productivity at MAD-Ridge did not result from a Taylor column (Annasawmy et al., 2019c) since the latter may form transiently, under specific conditions of summit depth, water column stratification and current speeds (Owens & Hogg, 1980, Freeland, 1994, Mohn et al., 2009, Wagawa et al., 2012; Bashmachnikov et al., 2013). Read & Pollard (2017) concluded that while, Taylor columns may theoretically be formed over several seamounts of the Madagascar Ridge, the relatively strong currents associated with mesoscale eddies may

521

522

523

524

525
prevent their formation or sweep away any incipient Taylor cap before settlement. The
current speeds at La Pérouse were too high and the summit depth too shallow for Taylor
column formation (Annasawmy et al., 2019c). The high yearly biological productivity at
MAD-Ridge and connectivity with neighbouring seamounts of the Madagascar Ridge
(Letessier et al., 2017) and with the Madagascar shelf might be one of the reasons accounting
for the greater micronekton species richness and denser SSL and DSL at MAD-Ridge
compared to La Pérouse. Higher mean acoustic responses were also recorded along Petal V
during MAD-Ridge, which may be an aggregating effect on organisms of the strong local
gradient of sea level anomalies at the anticyclonic eddy periphery (Sabarros et al., 2009).

## 4.3 Effect of seamounts on the DVM of micronekton

As evidenced in our study, the majority of micronekton taxa including various myctophids
performed daily DVM whereas the deep-dwelling *Pasiphaea* sp., *A. aculeatus*, *A. hemigymnus* and *Cyclothone* sp. did not migrate to surface layers at dusk. Diel vertical
migration did not occur as a single event, but as a successive series of events from, firstly, the
mid-water migrants which migrated from the intermediate layer to the DSL or deeper before
sunrise. Secondly, the surface migrants migrated from the SSL to the DSL or deeper during
sunrise. Various cues such as light penetration and intensity, productivity, oxygen minima,
temperature, food, clear oligotrophic waters and chemoreception of kairomones (chemical
cues) released by fish, are commonly thought to influence the vertical migration of organisms
and the onset of DVM (Youngbluth, 1975; Andersen et al., 1998; Cohen & Forward, 2009;
Ekau et al., 2010; Bernal et al., 2015; Olivar et al., 2012, 2017). The presence of a seamount
may cause some of the vertically migrating organisms to be temporarily blocked in their
upward ascent/downward descent and to be concentrated on the flanks of the seamount. This
"topographic blockage" mechanism/sound-scattering layer interception hypothesis has been
previously described (Isaacs & Schwartzlose, 1965; Genin, 2004; Porteiro & Sutton, 2007;
Hirch & Christiansen, 2010), whereby the pre-dawn migratory descent of some mesopelagic organisms was found to be temporarily halted by the seamount topography and presence of predators using the seamount as a barrier to concentrate prey (Johnston et al., 2008).

4.4 Micronekton scattering layers and assemblages at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge

At both La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts, the night SSL was shown to consist of gelatinous organisms (pyrosomes) and a range of common open-water swim-bladdered mesopelagic fishes that undergo DVM and are strong acoustic targets at the 38 kHz frequency. The day SSL, on the other hand, consisted of non-migrant gelatinous organisms, phyllosoma larvae, leptocephali (La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge) and few cephalopods (MAD-Ridge). While gelatinous organisms are strong targets at the 38 khz, phyllosoma larvae, leptocephali and cephalopods are relatively weak targets at this frequency. Scattering layers being strong targets at the 70 kHz frequency were observed at various distances from MAD-Ridge summit. These biological scatterers were not sampled by the IYGPT net but were shown to be associated with the depth of the maximum fluorescence (Annasawmy et al., 2019c). These organisms may be phytoplankton-eaters, siphonophores with pneumatophores smaller than those having a high response to the 38 kHz frequency (Arthur Blanluet, pers. comm.), or larger crustaceans that have a response to the 70 kHz frequency but have escaped our trawls. The day and night SSL may also have consisted of organisms that were horizontally advected in addition to species showing vertical migration (Annasawmy et al., 2019c).

A DSL was present both during the day and night at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts. The DSL is a ubiquitous acoustic signature and is commonly formed by mesopelagic fishes and invertebrates (Aksnes et al., 2017; Proud et al., 2017). DSLs were shown to be dominated by non-migrant swimbladdered sternopychids and gonostomatids in the Atlantic (Fennell &
Rose, 2015; Ariza et al., 2016), Pacific (Romero-Romero et al., 2019) and Indian Oceans, south of Mauritius Island and in the Mozambique Channel (Annasawmy et al., 2018). However, the DSL depth is not uniform across ocean basins. The DSL was deeper in the south-western Indian Ocean at La Pérouse (500-650m), MAD-Ridge (400-700 m), south of Mauritius and Reunion Islands and over the Madagascar Ridge (400-800 m) (Boersch-Supan et al., 2017), compared to the Chagos Archipelago in the central Indian Ocean, where it extended from 300 to 600 m (Letessier et al., 2015). Micronekton taxa showing delayed vertical migration and no DVM contributed to the backscatter intensities within the night DSL. Delayed vertical migration of organisms at night is commonly employed by organisms to reduce competition during feeding (Watanabe et al., 2002). Some of these organisms were bathypelagic species still ascending from depths deeper than 1000 m at the time that the acoustic transects were conducted.

The most common squids sampled at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge can be divided into the following main groups (as defined by Nesis, 1993): nerito-oceanic species that occur over seamounts as paralarvae, juveniles or sub-adults (eg. Onychoteuthidae and Histioteuthidae) and diel vertically migrating species that are advected over seamounts at night and descend to deeper depths at dawn (*Abraliopsis* sp.-Enoploteuthidae, Histioteuthidae and Octopoteuthidae). *Abraliopsis* sp. may descend deeper than 1000 m during day time, hence the low numbers caught in the day deep trawls. Of the 77 cephalopod taxa reported from the region of the Madagascar Ridge (Laptikhovsky et al., 2017), our study sampled only 17 taxa at both La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts, largely under sampling this broad category. Squids are also relatively weak acoustic targets at 38 kHz (Simmonds & MacLennan, 2005) and studies commonly used a combination of frequencies to locate squid schools (Starr and Thorne, 1998). Of the 32 species of decapods and lophogastrids reported from the Madagascar Ridge, (Letessier et al., 2017), only 16 and 13 crustacean taxa were correctly
identified at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge respectively. Studies have found elevated abundances of crustacean taxa in the vicinity of seamounts of the South West Indian Ridge and have concluded that some taxa may resist advective lost from seamounts by active migration (Letessier et al., 2017). These taxa were reported to support rich communities of benthopelagic fishes living close to the bottom of the ridge (Vereshchaka et al., 1995).

While *D. suborbitalis*, *N. macrolepidotus* and *B. fibulatum* are diel vertical migrants, associated with the summit and flanks of seamounts but can also be found in the open ocean at the seamount's vicinity, the non-migrant benthopelagic fish species *C. japonicus* and larvae from the Priacanthidae family, were exclusively caught over the summit of MAD-Ridge and were hence truly resident at the seamount. Large populations of *D. suborbitalis* have previously been found to be associated with the Equator seamount (close to the shallow peak called Travin Bank) in the Indian Ocean (Parin & Prut'ko, 1985; Porteiro & Sutton, 2007). These fishes were reported to be located on the slopes at 500-600 m depth during daylight hours and to ascend in dense schools to 80-150 m depth at night for feeding on oceanic plankton, mainly copepods (Gorelova & Prut'ko, 1985), while at the same time being preyed upon by several top predators such as tunas and swordfish (Parin & Prut'ko, 1985). The fish *B. fibulatum* was found to be associated with the Hawaiian Cross seamount summit (330 m below the sea surface) in the Pacific (De Forest & Drazen, 2009), but abundance estimates at the seamount depended largely on lunar illumination (Drazen et al., 2011).

4.5 Do seamounts have higher abundance/biomasses/densities over the summit?

The physical obstruction created by a seamount has been hypothesized to reduce the density of animals over the flanks and summits, particularly at night (eg. Genin et al., 1988; Diekmann et al., 2006; De Forest & Drazen, 2009), hence the lower abundance/biomass estimates of micronekton over the summit compared to the immediate vicinity. However,
624 gas-bearing seamount-associated/resident fauna including *D. suborbitalis*, *N. macrolepidotus*,
625 *B. fibulatum*, *C. japonicus* (MAD-Ridge) and *D. suborbitalis* (La Pérouse), might have
626 formed dense aggregations below the SSL, in close proximity to the summits and flanks
627 (hence the “white patches” seen on RGB composites). The densities and/or target strengths of
628 these organisms are high. These high acoustic detections might also have been caused by
629 deep-water fish aggregations (more commonly described as “plumes”) (Bull et al., 2001;
630 O'Driscoll et al., 2012) that were not sampled by the IYGPT net. Fish species such as orange
631 roughy which are commercially fished at Walter Shoals along the Madagascar Ridge
632 (Collette & Parin, 1991), are poor acoustic targets due to their oil-filled swimbladders and are
633 known to avoid mesopelagic trawls (Kloser et al., 2002). The plume peaks that rose above the
634 summits of La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts into the water column might have been
635 caused by horizontal fish movements from elsewhere on the seamount or vertical movements
636 when fish moved in the water column (O'Driscoll et al., 2012). These plumes may represent
637 aggregations of seamount-resident fishes that avoided advective loss from the seamount and
638 formed dense aggregations over the summits and flanks. In the open ocean such as the South
639 Mozambique Channel, micronekton were more dispersed in the water column since no dense
640 aggregations (“white patches”) were observed.

641 Organisms may associate with the La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts: (1) to increase
642 feeding efficiency (Vereshchaka et al., 1995; Wilson & Boehlert, 2004), (2) to take advantage
643 of a broader range of habitat diversity created by the topography (Wilson & Boehlert, 2004;
644 Porteiro & Sutton, 2007) such as shelter regions for spawning, and (3) to decrease energy loss
645 by using this habitat as a shelter during non-feeding intervals whereby in the open ocean
646 organisms may have to swim constantly. Annasawmy et al., (2019a) showed these seamount-
647 associated fishes to prey on calanoida and chaetognatha at the MAD-Ridge summit and to
648 display similar trophic levels irrespective of their body sizes, confirming the importance of
649

MAD-Ridge seamount as a feeding ground for some mesopelagic/benthopelagic taxa.

650

Benthopelagic animals (such as *C. japonicus*) were reported to prefer rocky seabeds and may take advantage of strong currents over seamounts for advection of their main prey items while avoiding being swept from the summit by using rocky canyons within the seamount topography as shelter regions (Vereshchaka et al., 1995).

651

652

653

654

The reasons for the observed variability in mean backscatter at MAD-Ridge summit compared to the immediate vicinity and the reasons for the observed decrease in trawl abundance/biomass estimates at the summit are further discussed with respect to the sampling strategy and IYGPT net used. Although trawl surveys are necessary to determine the taxonomic composition of micronekton present in the water column in space and time, the composition and biomass obtained largely depend on the type of trawl used (Kwong et al., 2018), their catchability towards various taxonomic groups of nekton and the depth range sampled. Trawl sampling is difficult on shallow topographies because of the high risk of damaging the sampling gear (Christiansen et al., 2009). Hence, the time spent surveying the summit is generally limited. The trawls #14, 15 and 16 over the summit and flanks of MAD-Ridge were directed to specifically sample dense aggregations observed by acoustics and hence the trawl had failed to capture the full suite of organisms present at the study sites.

655

656

657

658

659

660

661

662

663

664

665

666

667

668

669

670

While trawl surveys are useful in terms of the determination of the species composition and assemblages of micronekton, they are also generally expensive, time-consuming and allow a relatively limited collection of samples at any given area. Trawl catches provide only a snapshot of the communities dwelling at seamounts which depends strongly on the time of day and the sampling depths.

671

Active acoustics, on the other hand, while not being able to correctly resolve the taxonomic composition of the micronekton fauna yet, provide continuous measurements of the mesopelagic layer and can be used to determine organisms' abundances/densities,

672

673
movements and migrations at various spatial and temporal scales. The combination of active
acoustics with trawl and Scanmar data in the form of RGB composites provide invaluable
insights into the distributions, the depths of the different scattering layers, the scattering
properties of organisms and can be used to speculate about organisms' aggregating
behaviour. Kloser et al. (2002) used a similar approach, but the composite image was
produced by assigning a separate colour palette to each frequency (12 kHz, 38 kHz and 120
kHz) and dynamically optimising the frequencies to highlight the amplitude differences in the
echogram. Our RGB composite approach has the added advantage of further highlighting the
presence of structures under-sampled by trawls due to their patchy distribution ("blue
patches" with a high frequency response to the 120 kHz; Fig. 10d, Trawl #21 at ~30m) and
that could be further investigated using multi-frequency classification.

Due to the successful collection of mesopelagic organisms that can be used to ground-truth
the biological scatterers observed under acoustics, our future work will focus on multi-
frequency classification to better discriminate sound scatterers, thus allowing us to investigate
the relative composition and density of the most common micronekton taxa across the whole
cruises where trawl data are missing. This study allowed accurate visual observations of
communities present over seamounts at the time of the cruises and will allow the
development of accurate schematics, representing the various DVM strategies and the
different scattering properties of the micronekton broad categories (gelatinous organisms,
crustaceans, cephalopods and fishes) in the open ocean, on the flanks and summits of
seamounts.

Concluding remarks

We used a combination of datasets (active acoustics and mesopelagic trawls) to investigate
the dynamics of micronekton at two shallow seamounts. The eddy dynamics, advection of
productivity from the Madagascar landmass and connectivity with neighbouring seamounts and landmasses may result in greater micronekton species richness at MAD-Ridge compared to La Pérouse which is located in an oligotrophic environment. As topographic obstacles, seamounts may have an impact on the vertical distribution of micronekton by temporarily halting the latter in their upward and downward migrations. The night SSL (between 10-200 m) over the summit and flanks concentrated common open-water species of gelatinous (salps and pyrosomes), crustaceans (Euphausiacea sp., *Funchalia* sp. and phyllosoma larvae), squids (Enoplotethidae sp., *C. scabra* and *Abraliopsis* sp.), and fishes (leptocephali larvae, *H. hygomii* and various species of *Diaphus* sp.). In addition to the vertically migrant organisms forming the SSL, we provided evidence that La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts support an important community of seamount-associated/resident fishes (La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge: *D. suborbitalis*; MAD-Ridge: *B. fibulatum* and *C. japonicus*) that occur in dense aggregations over the summits and flanks. Despite several shortcomings in this work, notably during La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge cruise sampling, this study fills an important knowledge gap. The combined use of satellite, mesopelagic trawl and acoustic data at the time of the cruises, provides an integrative and accurate picture as to the mechanisms involved in micronekton vertical/horizontal distributions and assemblages at shallow topographies. More importantly, this study helps contribute to our growing understanding of seamount ecosystems in the south-western Indian Ocean. Improving our knowledge of the ecosystems associated to shallow seamounts is a key issue towards the promotion of specific sustainable use and conservation measures dedicated to protecting such critical environments.

## Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the work carried by the non-scientific staff on board the R.V. ANTEA and the scientific staff who participated in the data acquisition and data processing, including Delphine Thibault (MIO, Marseille, France), P. Alexander Hulley (South Africa)
723 for confirming the taxonomy of the micronekton taxa and Hervé Demarcq (IRD, Sète,

724 France) for providing the SSC data. This study was mainly supported by the Flotte

725 Océanographique Française (French Oceanographic Fleet) and IRD in relation to the logistics

726 of the R.V. ANTEA. Additional funding was received from Région Reunion (Réunion

727 Regional Council) for La Pérouse cruise, and from the Fonds Français pour l'Environnement

728 Mondial (FFEM) as part of the FFEM-SWIO project on Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction

729 (ABNJ) of the South West Indian Ocean for MAD-Ridge cruise. Pavanee Annasawmy is the

730 beneficiary of a doctoral bursary granted by the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement

731 (IRD, France) and the ICEMASA French-South African International Laboratory.
References

Adduce, C., Cenedese, C., 2004. An experimental study of a mesoscale vortex colliding with topography of varying geometry in a rotating fluid. J. Mar. Res. 62, 611-638.
https://doi.org/10.1357/0022240042387583

Aksnes, D. L., Røstad, A., Kaartvedt, S., Martinez, U., Duarte, C.M., Irigoien, X., 2017. Light penetration structures the deep acoustic scattering layers in the global ocean. Sci. Adv. 3: e1602468

Alverson, F.G., 1961. Daylight Surface Occurrence of Myctophid Fishes Off the Coast of Central America. Pac Sci. 15(3): 483. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/9088

Andersen, V., François, F., Sardou, J., Picheral, M., Scotto, M., Nival, P., 1998. Vertical distributions of macroplankton and micronekton in the Ligurian and Tyrrhenian Seas (northwestern Mediterranean). Oceanol. Acta 21, 5.

Annasawmy, P., Cherel, Y., Romanov, E., Le Loc'h, F., Ménard, F., Ternon, J.F., Marsac, F., 2019a. Stable isotope patterns of mesopelagic communities over two shallow seamounts of the south-western Indian Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. II, submitted.

Annasawmy, P., Ternon, J-F., Lebourges-Dhaussy, A., Roudaut, G., Herbette, S., Ménard, F., Cotel. P., Marsac, F., 2019c. Micronekton distribution as influenced by mesoscale eddies, Madagascar shelf and shallow seamounts in the south-western Indian Ocean: An acoustic approach. Deep-Sea Res. II-submitted.

Annasawmy, P., Ternon, J.F., Marsac, F., Cherel, Y., Béhagle, N., Roudaut, G., Lebourges-Dhaussy, A., Demarcq, H., Moloney, C.L., Jaquemet, S., Ménard, F., 2018. Micronekton diel migration, community composition and trophic position within two biogeochemical provinces of the South West Indian Ocean: Insight from acoustics and stable isotopes. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 138, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2018.07.002

Ariza, A., Landeira, J.M., Escánez, A., Wienerroither, R., Aguilar de Soto, N., Røstad, A., Kaartvedt, S., Hernández-León, S., 2016. Vertical distribution, composition and migratory patterns of acoustic scattering layers in the Canary Islands. J. Mar. Syst. 157, 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.01.004

Bashmachnikov, I., Loureiro, C.M., Martins, A., 2013. Topographically induced circulation patterns and mixing over Condor seamount. Deep-Sea Res. II. 98: 38-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.09.014

Béhagle, N., du Buisson, L., Josse, E., Lebourges-Dhaussy, A., Roudaut, G., Ménard, F., 2014. Mesoscale features and micronekton in Mozambique Channel: An acoustic approach. Deep Sea Res. Part II. 100, 164-173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.10.024

Béhagle, N., Cotté, C., Lebourges-Dhaussy, A., Roudaut, G., Duhamel, G., Brehmer, P., Josse, E., Cherel, Y., 2017. Acoustic distribution of discriminated micronektonic organisms from a bi-frequency processing: the case study of eastern Kerguelen oceanic waters. Prog. Oceanogr. 156, 276-289.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.06.004

Benoit-Bird, K. J., Lawson, G. L., 2016. Ecological Insights from Pelagic Habitats Acquired Using Active Acoustic Techniques. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 8, 21.1-21.28.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-034001

Bensch, A., Gianni, M., Gréboval, D., Sanders, J., Hjort, A., 2009. Worldwide review of bottom fisheries in the high seas. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. 522(1). Rome. 145p.
Bernal, A., Olivar, M.P., Maynou, F., Fernández de Puelles, M.L., 2015. Diet and feeding strategies of mesopelagic fishes in the western Mediterranean. Progr. Oceanogr. 135, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j-pocean.2015.03.005.

Boehlert, G.W., and Genin, A., 1987. A review of the effects of seamounts on biological processes. In: Seamounts, Islands and Atolls (eds. Keating, B.H., Fryer, P., Batiza, R. and Boehlert, G.W.), p. 319-34. Geophysics Monographic Series 43. American Geophysical Union. Washington, DC.

Boersch-Supan, P., Rogers, A.D., Brierley, A.S., 2017. The distribution of pelagic sound scattering layers across the southwest Indian Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. II. 136: 108-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.06.023

Bograd, S.J., Rabinovich, A.B., LeBlond, P.H., Shore, J.A., 1997. Observations of seamount-attached eddies in the North Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans. 102, 12441-12456. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC00585

Brodeur, R., and Yamamura, O., 2005. PICES Scientific Report No. 30 Micronekton of the North Pacific. PICES Scientific Report, Sidney, B.C., Canada, pp. 1-115.

Bull, B., Doonan, I., Tracey, D., Hart, A., 2001. Diel variation in spawning orange roughy (*Hoplostethus atlanticus*, Trachichthyidae) abundance over a seamount feature on the north-west Chatham Rise. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 35(3): 435-444. DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2001.9517013

Cascão, I., Domokos, R., Lammers, M.O., Marques, V., Domínguez, R., Santos, R.S., Silva, M.A., 2017. Persistent enhancement of micronekton backscatter at the summits of seamounts in the Azores. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00025

Cherel, Y., Fontaine, C., Richard, P., Labat, J-P., 2010. Isotopic niches and trophic levels of myctophid fishes and their predators in the Southern Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 55(1), 324-332. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0324

Cherel, Y., Romanov, E.V., Annasawmy, P., Thibault, D., Ménard, F., 2019. Micronektonic fish species over three seamounts in the southwestern Indian Ocean and myctophid infestation by the copepod *Cardiodectes bellotti*. Deep-Sea Res. II-submitted.

Christiansen, B., Martin, B., Hirch, S., 2009. The benthopelagic fish fauna on the summit of Seine seamount, NE Atlantic: Composition, population structure and diets. Deep Sea Res. Part II. 56(25), 2705-2712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.032

Clark, M.R., Vinnichenko, V.I., Gordon, J.D.M., Beck-Bulat, G.Z., Kukharev, N.N., Kakora, A.F., 2007. Large-scale distant-water trawl fisheries on seamounts. In: Pitcher, T.J., Morato, T., Hart, P.J.B., Clark, M.R., Haggan, N., Santos, R.S. (Eds.), Seamounts: Ecology, Fisheries & Conservation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp. 361-399. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470691953.ch4

Clarke, M.R., Lu, C.C., 1975. Vertical distribution of cephalopods at 18°N 25°W in the North Atlantic. J. mar. biol. Ass. 55: 165-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400015812

Clarke, K. R., Warwick, R. M., 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edition. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK.

Cohen, J.H., Forward, R.B., 2009. Zooplankton diel vertical migration- a review of proximate control. Oceanography and marine biology. 47: 77-109. DOI: 10.1201/9781420094220.ch2

Collette, B.B., Parin, N.V., 1991. Shallow-water fishes of Walters Shoals, Madagascar Ridge. Bulletin of Marine Science. 48(1):1-22.

Danckwerts, D.K., McQuaid, C.D., Jaeger, A., McGregor, G.K., Dwight, R., Le Corre, M., Jaquemet, S., 2014. Biomass consumption by breeding seabirds in the western Indian Ocean: indirect interactions with fisheries and implications for management. ICES Jour. of Mar. Sci. 71(9), 2589-2598. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu093
Davison, P. C., Koslow, J. A., Kloser, R. J., 2015. Acoustic biomass estimation of mesopelagic fish: backscattering from individuals, populations, and communities. ICES Jour. Mar. Sci. 72(5), 1413-1424. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv023

De Forest, L., Drazen, J., 2009. The influence of a Hawaiian seamount on mesopelagic micronekton. Deep Sea Res Part I. 56(2), 232-250.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2008.09.007

De Robertis, A., Higginbottom, I., 2007. A post-processing technique to estimate the signal-to-noise ratio and remove echosounder background noise. ICES Jour. Mar. Sci. 64, 1282-1291. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm112

Diekmann, R., Nellen, W., Piatkowski, U., 2006. A multivariate analysis of larval fish and paralarval cephalopod assemblages at Great Meteor Seamount. Deep-Sea Res. I. 53: 1635-1657. DOI:10.1016/j.dsr.2006.08.00

Domokos, R., Pakhomov, E.A., Suntsov, A.V., Seki, M.P., Polovina, J.J., 2010. PICES Scientific Report. No. 38. Acoustic characterization of the mesopelagic community off the leeward coast of Oahu Island, Hawaii. E. A. Pakhomov, O. Yamamura (Eds.), Report of the Advisory Panel on Micronekton Sampling Intercalibration Experiment.pp 19-26.

Drazen, J. F., De Forest, L. G., Domokos, R., 2011. Micronekton abundance and biomass in Hawaiian waters as influenced by seamounts, eddies and the moon. Deep Sea Res Part I. 58, 557-566. http/doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2011.03.002

Dubroca, L., Chassot, E., Floch, L., Demarcq, H., Assan, C., Delgado de Molina, A., 2013. Seamounts and tuna fisheries: Tuna hotspots or fishermen habits? Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT. 69(5), 2087-2102.

Dulau, V., Pinet, P., Geyer, Y., Fayan, J., Mongin, P., Cottarel, G., Zerbini, A., Cerchio, S., 2017. Continuous movement behavior of humpback whales during the breeding season in the southwest Indian Ocean: on the road again! Movement Ecology. 5(11):2-17. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-017-0101-5

Ekau, W., Auel, H., Pörtner, H.-O., Gilbert, D., 2010. Impacts of hypoxia on the structure and processes in pelagic communities (zooplankton, macro-invertebrates and fish). Biogeosciences 7, 1669-1699. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1669-2010.

Fennell, S., Rose, G., 2015. Oceanographic influences on Deep Scattering Layers across the North Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res I. 105: 132-141.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2015.09.002

Foote, K. G., Knudsen, H. P., Vestnes, G., MacLennan, D. N., Simmonds, E. J., 1987. Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation: a practical guide. ICES Coop. Res. Rep. 144, 1-69.

Fonteneau, A. 1991. Monts sous-marins et thons dans l'Atlantique tropical est. Aquat. Living Resour. 4, 13-25.

Freeland, H., 1994. Ocean circulation at and near Cobb Seamount. Deep-Sea Res. I. 41(11/12): 1715-1732.

Fréon, P., and Dagorn, L., 2000. Review of fish associative behaviour: Toward a generalisation of the meeting point hypothesis. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 10, 183-207. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016666108540

Furusawa, M., Miyanohana, Y., Ariji, M., Sawada, Y., 1994. Prediction of krill target strength by liquid prolate spheroid model. Fisheries Science. 60(3): 261-265.

Genin, A., Haury, L., Greenblatt, P., 1988. Interactions of migrating zooplankton with shallow topography: predation by rockfishes and intensification of patchiness. Deep-Sea Res. 35(2): 151-175.

Genin, A., 2004. Bio-physical coupling in the formation of zooplankton and fish aggregations above adrupt topographies. J. Mar. Syst. 50, 3-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2003.10.008

Gjosaeter, J., 1978. Aspects of the distribution and ecology of the Myctophidae from the Western and Northern Arabian Sea. Development Report Indian Ocean Programme, 43: 62–108.

Gjosaeter, J., 1984. Mesopelagic fish, a large potential resource in the Arabian Sea. Deep-Sea Res. Part A. 31:1019–1035.

Gorelova, T. A., and Prut'ko, V. G., 1985. Feeding of *Diaphus suborbitalis* (Myctophidae, Pisces) in the Equatorial Indian Ocean. Okeanologiya, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, (25): 523-529

Guinet, C., Cherel, Y., Ridoux, V., Jouventin, P., 1996. Consumption of marine resources by seabirds and seals in Crozet and Kerguelen waters: changes in relation to consumer biomass 1962-85. Antarctic Sci. 8(1), 23-30.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102096000053

Herbette, S., Morel, Y., Arhan, M., 2003. Erosion of a surface vortex by a seamount. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 33(1), 664-679. https://doi.org/10.1175/2382.1

Hirch, S., Christiansen, B., 2010. The trophic blockage hypothesis is not supported by the diets of fishes on Seine seamount. Mar. Ecol. 31(Suppl. 1): 107-120.
DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0485.2010.00366.x

Holland, K. N., and Grubbs, R. D., 2007. Fish visitors to seamounts: Tunas and billfish at seamounts. In Seamounts: Ecology, Fisheries and Conservation. 189-201.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470691953.ch10a.

Ingole, B., Koslow, J.A., 2005. Deep-sea ecosystems of the Indian Ocean. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences. 34(1): 27-34.

Isaacs, J. D., Schwartzlose, R. A., 1965. Migrant sound scatterers: Interaction with the sea floor. Science. 150(3705), 1810-1813. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3705.1810

Jaquemet, S., Ternon, J. F., Kaehler, S., Thiebot, J. B., Dyer, B., Bemanaja, E., Marteau, C., Le Corre, M., 2014. Contrasted structuring effects of mesoscale features on the seabird communities in the Mozambique Channel. Deep Sea Res Part II. 100, 200-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.10.027

Johnston, D. W., McDonald, M., Polovina, J., Domokos, R., Wiggins, S., Hildebrand, J., 2008. Temporal patterns in the acoustic signals of beaked whales at Cross Seamount. Biol. Lett. 4, 208–211. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0614

Judkins, D.C., and Haedrich, R.L., 2018. The deep scattering layer micronektonic fish faunas of the Atlantic mesopelagic ecoregions with comparison of the corresponding decapod shrimp faunas. Deep Sea Res. Part I. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2018.04.008

Kaartvedt, S., Klevjer, T.A., Aksnes, D.L., 2012. Internal wave-mediated shading causes frequent vertical migrations in fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 452: 1-10.
DOI: 10.3354/meps09688

Kloser, R. J., Ryan, T., Sakov, P., Williams, A., Koslow, J. A., 2002. Species identification in deep water using multiple acoustic frequencies. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1139/f02-076

Kloser, R. J., Ryan, T. E., Young, J. W., Lewis, M. E., 2009. Acoustic observations of micronekton fish on the scale of an ocean basin: potential and challenges. ICES Jour. Mar. Sci. 66(6), 998-1006. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsp077

Kloser, R.J., Ryan, T.E., Keith, G., Gershwin, L., 2016. Deep-scattering layer, gas-bladder density, and size estimates using a two-frequency acoustic and optical probe. ICES J Mar Sci. 73(8): 2037-2048. DOI:10.1093/icesjms/fsv257

Kolasinski, J., Kaehler, S., Jaquemet, S., 2012. Distribution and sources of particulate organic matter in a mesoscale eddy dipole in the Mozambique Channel (south-western Indian
Ocean): Insight from C and N stable isotopes. J. Mar. Syst. 96-97, 122-131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.02.015

Kwong, L.E., Pakhomov, E.A., Suntsov, A.V., Seki, M.P., Brodeur, R.D., Pakhomova, L.G., Domokos, R., 2018. An intercomparison of the taxonomic and size composition of tropical macrozooplankton and micronekton collected using three sampling gears. Deep Sea Res. Part I. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2018.03.013

Lack, M., Short, K., Willock, A., 2003. Managing risk and uncertainty in deep-sea fisheries: lessons from Orange Roughy. TRAFFIC Oceania and WWF Endangered Seas Programme.

Laptikhovsky, V., Boersch-Supan, P., Bolstad, K., Kemp, K., Letessier, T., Rogers, A.D., 2017. Cephalopods of the Southwest Indian OceanRidge: A hotspot of biological diversity and absence of endemism. Deep-Sea Res II. 136: 98-107.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.07.002

Lavelle, J. W., Mohn, C., 2010. Motion, commotion, and biophysical connections at deep ocean seamounts. Oceanography. 23(1), 90-103.
https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2010.64

Lebourges-Dhaussy, A., Marchal., E., Menkès, C., Champalbert, G., Biessy, B., 2000.
*Vinciguerria nimbaria* (micronekton), environment and tuna: their relationships in the
eastern Tropical Atlantic. Oceanologica Acta. 23(4), 515-528.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(00)00137-7

Lehodey, P., Murtugudde, R., Senina, I., 2010. Bridging the gap from ocean models to population dynamics of large marine predators: A model of mid-trophic functional groups. Prog. in Oceanography. 84: 69-84. DOI:10.1016/j-pocean.2009.09.008

Letessier, T.B., Cox, M.J., Meeuwig, J.J., Boersch-Supan, P.H., Brierley, A.S., 2015. Enhanced pelagic biomass around coral atolls. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 546: 271-276. DOI: 10.3354/meps11675

Letessier, T.B., De Grave, S., Boersch-Supan, P.H., Kemp, K.M., Brierley, A.S., Rogers, A.D., 2017. Seamount influences on mid-water shrimps (Decapoda) and gnathophausiids (Lophogastridea) of the South-West Indian Ridge. Deep-Sea Res. II. 136: 85-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.05.009

Longhurst, A., 2007. Ecological geography of the sea. 2nd edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

MacLennan, D. N., Fernandes, P. G., Dalen, J., 2002. A consistent approach to definitions and symbols in fisheries acoustics. ICES Jour. Mar. Sci. 59, 365-369.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2001.1158

Marchal, E., Lebourges-Dhaussy, A., 1996. Acoustic evidence for unusual diel behaviour of a mesopelagic fish (*Vinciguerria nimbaria*) exploited by tuna. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 53, 443-447. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1996.0062

Marsac, F., Fonteneau, A., Michaud, P., 2014. Le « Coco de Mer », une montagne sous la mer. In: L'or bleu des Seychelles: Histoire de la pêche industrielle au thon dans l'océan Indien. IRD Editions, pp 151-163.

McClatchie, S., Coombs, R.F., 2005. Low target strength fish in mixed species assemblages: the case of orange roughy. Fisheries Research. 72: 185-192.
DOI:10.1016/j.fishres.2004.11.008

Mohn, C., Beckmann, A., 2002. The upper ocean circulation at Great Meteor Seamount. Ocean Dyn. 52, 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-002-0017-4

Mohn, C., White, M., Bashmachnikov, I., Jose, F., Pelegri, J.L., 2009. Dynamics at an elongated, intermediate depth seamount in the North Atlantic (Sedlo Seamount, 40°20′N, 26°40′W). Deep-Sea Res. II. 56: 2582-2592.
DOI:10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.037
Morato, T., Varkey, D. A., Damaso, C., Machete, M., Santos, M., Prieto, R., Santos, R. S., and Pitcher, T. J., 2008. Evidence of a seamount effect on aggregating visitors. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 357, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07269

Nesis, K., 1993. Cephalopods of seamounts and submarine ridges. In: Okutani, T., O'Dor, R.K., Kubodera, T. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Cephalopod Fisheries Biology. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 365-374.

O'Driscoll, R., De Joux, P., Nelson, R., Macaulay, G.J., Dunford, A.J., Marriott, P.M., Stewart, C., Miller, B.S., 2012. Species identification in seamount fish aggregations using moored underwater video. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 69(4): 648-659.
DOI:10.1093/icesjms/fss010

Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., 2018. Package 'vegan': Community Ecology Package, R package version 2.5-1.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

Olivar, M.P., Bernal, A., Molí, B., Peña, M., Balbín, R., Castellón, A., Miquel, J., Massutí, E., 2012. Vertical distribution, diversity and assemblages of mesopelagic fishes in the western Mediterranean. Deep Sea Res. Part I 62, 53-69.

Olivar, M.P., Hulley, P.A., Castellón, A., Emelianov, M., López, C., Tuset, V.M., Contreras, T., Molí, B., 2017. Mesopelagic fishes across the tropical and equatorial Atlantic: biogeographical and vertical patterns. Progr. Oceanogr. 151, 116-137.

Owens, W.B., Hogg, N.G., 1980. Oceanic observations of stratified Taylor columns near a bump. Deep-Sea Res. 27A: 1029-1045.

Parin, N. V., and Prut'ko, V. G., 1985. Thalassal mesobenthopelagic ichthyocoenosis above the Equator Seamount in the western tropical Indian Ocean. Okeanologiya, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 25(6): 1017-1020.

Parin, N.V., Timokhin, I.G., Novikov, N.P., Shcherbachev, Y.N., 2008. On the composition of talassobathyal ichthyofauna and commercial productivity of Mozambique Seamount (the Indian Ocean). Journal of Ichthyology. 48(5): 361-366.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945208050019

Pearcy, W.G., Krygier, E.E., Mesecar, R., Ramsey, F., 1977. Vertical distribution and migration of oceanic micronekton off Oregon. Deep-Sea Res. 24: 223-245.

Perrot, Y., Brehmer, Y., Habasque, J., Roudaut, G., Béhagle, N., Sarré, A., Lebourges-Dhaussy, A., 2018. Matecho: An open-source tool for processing fisheries acoustics data. Acoust Aust. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-018-0135-x

Pollard, R., Read, J., 2015. Circulation, stratification and seamounts in the Southwest Indian Ocean. Deep Sea Res Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 136, 36-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.02.018

Porteiro, F.M., and Sutton, T., 2007. Midwater Fish Assemblages and Seamounts, in: Pitcher, T.J., Morato, T., Hart, P.J.B., Clark, M.R., Haggan, N., Santos, R.S. (Eds.), Seamounts: Ecology, Fisheries & Conservation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp. 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470691953.ch6

Potier, M., Marsac, F., Lucas, V., Sabatié, R., Hallier, J-P., Ménard, F., 2004. Feeding partitioning among tuna taken in surface and mid-water layers: The case of Yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and Bigeye (T. obesus) in the Western Tropical Indian Ocean. Western Indian Ocean J. Mar. Sci. 3(1), 51-62.

Potier, M., Marsac, F., Cherel, Y., Lucas, V., Sabatié, R., Maury, O., Ménard, F., 2007. Forage fauna in the diet of three large pelagic fishes (lancetfish, swordfish and yellowfin tuna) in the western equatorial Indian Ocean. Fisheries Research. 83, 60-72.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2006.08.020
Potier, M., Bach, P., Ménard, F., Marsac, F., 2014. Influence of mesoscale features on micronekton and large pelagic fish communities in the Mozambique Channel. Deep Sea Res Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 100, 184-199.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.10.026

Proud, R., Cox, M. J., Brierley, A. S., 2017. Biogeography of the global ocean's mesopelagic zone. Current Biology. 27, 113-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.003

Proud, R., Handegard, N. O., Kloser, R. J., Cox, M. J., Brierley, A. S., 2018. From siphonophores to deep scattering layers: uncertainty ranges for the estimation of global mesopelagic fish biomass. ICES J. Mar. Sci. fsy037.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy037

Quartly, G. D., and Srokosz, M. A., 2004. Eddies in the southern Mozambique Channel. Deep Sea Res Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 51, 69-83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2003.03.001

Ramanantsoa, J. D., Krug, M., Penven, P., Rouault, M., Gula, J., 2018. Coastal upwelling south of Madagascar: Temporal and spatial variability. J. Mar. Syst. 178, 29-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.10.005

Read, J., Pollard, R., 2017. An introduction to the physical oceanography of six seamounts in the southwest Indian Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. II. 136: 44-58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.06.022

Reid, S.B., Hirota, J., Young, R.E., Hallacher, L.E., 1991. Mesopelagic-boundary community in Hawaii: micronekton at the interface between neritic and oceanic ecosystems. Mar. Biol. 109: 427-440.

Rogers, A.D., Bemanaja, O.A.E., Benivary, D., Boersch-Supan, P., Bornman, T.G., Cedras, R., Du Plessis, N., Gotheil, S., Høines, A., Kemp, K., Kristiansen, J., Letessier, T., Mangar, V., Mazungula, N., Mørk, T., Pinet, P., Pollard, R., Read, J., Sonnekus, T., 2017. Pelagic communities of the South West Indian Ocean seamounts: R/V Dr *Fridtjof Nansen* Cruise 2009-410. Deep Sea Res. II. 136: 5-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.12.010

Romanov, E.V., (2003). Summary and review of Soviet and Ukrainian scientific and commercial fishing operations on the deepwater ridges of the southern Indian Ocean. FAO Fisheries Circular. No. 991. Rome, FAO. 84p.

Romero-Romero, S., Choy, C.A., Hannides, C.C.S., Popp, B.N., Drazen, J.C., 2019. Differences in the trophic ecology of micronekton driven by diel vertical migration. Limnol. Oceanogr. 9999:1-11. DOI: 10.1002/lno.11128

Royer, T.C., 1978. Ocean eddies generated by seamounts in the North Pacific. Science. 199, 1063-4.

Ryan, T. E., Downie, R. A., Kloser, R. J., Keith, G., 2015. Reducing bias due to noise and attenuation in open-ocean echo integration data. ICES Jour. Mar. Sci. 72, 2482-2493.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv121

Sabarros, P.S., Ménard, F., Lévénez, J-J., Tew-Kai, E., Ternon, J-F., 2009. Mesoscale eddies influence distribution and aggregation patterns of micronekton in the Mozambique Channel. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 395: 101-107. DOI: 10.3354/meps08087

Schouten, M. W., De Ruijter, W. P. M., van Leeuwen, P. J., 2000. Translation, decay and splitting of Agulhas rings in the southeastern Atlantic Ocean. JGR. 105(9), 21913-21925. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC000046

Simmonds, J., MacLennan, D., 2005. Fisheries Acoustics: theory and practice. Second Edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK. 437 pp.

Smith, M.M., Heemstra, P.C., 1986. Smith's Sea Fishes. J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Grahamstown, South Africa. 1047 p.
Starr, R.M., Throne, R.E., 1998. Acoustic assessment of squid stocks. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 181-198.

Sutyrin, G. G., 2006. Critical effects of a tall seamount on a drifting vortex. J. Mar. Res. 64(2), 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1357/002224006777606489

Swart, N. C., Lutjeharms, J. R. E., Ridderinkhof, H., de Ruijter, W. P. M., 2010. Observed characteristics of Mozambique Channel eddies. J. Geophys. Res. 115, C09006/1-C09006/14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005875

Tew-Kai, E., and Marsac, F., 2009. Patterns of variability of sea surface chlorophyll in the Mozambique Channel: A quantitative approach. J. Mar. Sys. 77, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.11.007

Tracey, D. M., Clark, M. R., Anderson, O. F., Kim, S. W., 2012. Deep-sea fish distribution varies between seamounts: Results from a seamount complex off New Zealand. PLOS One. 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036897

Trenkel, V. M., Berger, L., Bourguignon, S., Doray, M., Fablet, R., Massé, J., Mazauric, V., Poncelet, C., Quemener, G., Scalabrin, C., Villalobos, H., 2009. Overview of recent progress in fisheries acoustics made by Ifremer with examples from the Bay of Biscay. Aquatic Living Res. 22, 433-445. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2009027

Van der Spoel, S., Bleeker, J., 1991. Distribution of Myctophidae (Pisces, Myctophiformes) during the four seasons in the mid North Atlantic. Contributions to Zoology. 61(2): 89-106.

Vereshchaka, A.L., 1995. Macroplankton in the near-bottom layer of continental slopes and seamounts. Deep-Sea Res. I. 42(9): 1639-1668.

Vianello, P., Ternon, J-F., Herbette, S., Demarcq, H., Roberts, M.J., 2019. Circulation and hydrography in the vicinity of a shallow seamount on the northern Madagascar Ridge. Deep-Sea Res. II-submitted

Wagawa, T., Yoshikawa, Y., Isoda, Y., Oka, E., Uehara, K., Nakano, T., Kuma, K., Takagi, S., 2012. Flow fields around the Emperor Seamounts detected from current data. Journal of Geophysical Research. 117(C06006). DOI: 10.1029/2011JC007530

Watanabe, H., Kawaguchi, K., Hayashi, A., 2002. Feeding habits of juvenile surface-migratory myctophid fishes (family Myctophidae) in the Kuroshio region of the western North Pacific. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 236: 263-272.

White, M., Bashmachnikov, I., Arstegui, J., Martins, A., 2007. Physical Processes and Seamount Productivity. In: Pitcher, T.J., Morato, T., Hart, P.J.B., Clark, M.R., Haggan, N., Santos, R.S. (Eds.), Seamounts: Ecology, Fisheries & Conservation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp. 62-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470691953.ch4

Wilson, C.D., and Boehlert, G.W., 2004. Interaction of ocean currents and resident micronekton at a seamount in the central North Pacific. J. Mar. Syst. 50, 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2003.09.013

Youngbluth, M.J., 1975. The vertical distribution and diel migration of euphausiids in the central waters of the eastern South Pacific. Deep-Sea Res. 22, 519-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(75)90033-9
List of tables and figures:

Table 1 Summary of trawl stations carried out at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts.

Figure 1 Map of the (a) La Pérouse trawl stations numbered 1 to 10, (b) MAD-Ridge trawl stations numbered 1 to 17 plotted on the bathymetry (m). Colour bar indicates depth below the sea surface (m). “Trawl MZC” refers to Trawl #21 carried in the Mozambique Channel.

Figure 2 Averaged sea level anomaly (MSLA) map, with La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts shown as black star symbols, and dated (a) 16-28 September 2016, (b) 14-23 November 2016. Colour bar indicates the SLA in cm, with positive SLA (red) and negative SLA (blue). (c) Averaged satellite image of chlorophyll *a* distribution from 18/09/2016 to 07/12/2016. Monthly mean chlorophyll *a* values for the region defined by the red squares are depicted from January to December 2016. The dates of La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge cruises are marked by grey bars on the monthly mean plot. Colour bar indicates the chlorophyll *a* concentration in mg m⁻³.

Figure 3(a) Petal-shaped acoustic transects I to VII carried at MAD-Ridge, starting at sunset/night (red/blue) at the summit (star symbol) and ending during the day (yellow) at the summit. Arrow heads give an example of change in ship direction. The Madagascar land mass is shown in grey. (b-h) Biomass density (Sv, dB re 1 m⁻¹) estimates for the 38 kHz frequency in the surface (10-200 m, red), intermediate (200-400 m, grey), deep layers (400-750 m, black), and total water column (yellow) for Petals I-VII. The time of day is denoted by coloured rectangles and the change in ship direction is denoted by black arrowheads. The position of MAD-Ridge seamount is denoted by grey rectangles on plots c-h.

Figure 4 Echograms of the 38 kHz frequency during (a) Petal II at sunset, night, sunrise and daytime denoted by red, blue, violet and gold coloured rectangles respectively, (b) Petal III, and (c) Petal IV. Diel vertical migraton (DVM) at dusk is denoted for Petal II. The successive series of DVM events from the intermediate layer and from the SSL are denoted by circular dotted lines. The night SSL and day SSL are denoted by solid and dotted rectangles respectively. The DSL is denoted by solid rectangles. Seamount-associated species and topographic blockage mechanism are also noted. Colour bar indicates Sv in dB re 1 m⁻¹.

Figure 5(a) Night time acoustic transects III to VII from the MAD-Ridge seamount summit (star symbol) to 14 nmi from the summit. The Madagascar land mass is shown in grey. Arrow indicates ship direction. (b) Biomass density (Sv, dB re 1 m⁻¹) estimates for the 38 kHz frequency in the surface layer (10-250 m) at night, from the summit (grey bar) to 14 nmi away from the seamount (vicinity), for Petals III to VII. (c) RGB composites of Sv values (dB re 1 m⁻¹) from 10-250 m for the selected acoustic transects III to VII, with the 38 kHz, 70 kHz and 120 kHz frequencies given red, green and blue colour codes respectively.

Figure 6 At La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts, (a) boxplot of total abundance and biomass estimates (in ind m⁻² and g WM⁻² respectively), (b) species richness with increasing sampling effort (volume of water filtered in 1000 m³), (c) length distributions of selected gelatinous plankton, crustaceans, cephalopods and epi-mesopelagic fishes sampled.

Figure 7(a) Similarity cluster dendrogram of species abundance at La Pérouse trawl stations 1 to 10. Brackets represent cluster groups at 40% (Summit; Night shallow, flank and vicinity; Night intermediate, vicinity; Night deep, vicinity). (b) Schematic diagram of La Pérouse seamount. Pie charts represent the abundance and biomass of micronekton (gelatinous organisms in blue, crustaceans in orange, cephalopods in violet and fishes in yellow) within the cluster groups. (c-d) Bubble plot overlays of the MDS ordination representing the relative
abundance of common (c) deep dwelling, (d) and seamount flank associated species. Trawl stations are numbered 1 to 10 on the bubble plots and the 40% similarity clusters are denoted by dotted lines. The larger the bubble, the greater the number of individuals captured at that trawl station.

Figure 8(a) Similarity cluster dendrogram of species abundance at MAD-Ridge trawl stations 1 to 17. Brackets represent cluster groups at 35% (Night shallow, vicinity and flank; Day deep, vicinity and flank); and 30% similarities (Night shallow, summit and flank). b) Schematic diagram of MAD-Ridge seamount. Pie charts represent the abundance and biomass of micronekton (gelatinous organisms in blue, crustaceans in orange, cephalopods in violet and fishes in yellow) within the cluster groups. (c-e) Bubble plot overlays of the MDS ordination representing the relative abundance of common (c) shallow-dwelling and vertical migratory fish species, (d) deep-dwelling, (e) and seamount summit and flank associated fish species. Trawl stations are numbered 1 to 17 on the bubble plots and the 35% and 30% similarity clusters are denoted by dotted lines. The larger the bubble, the greater the number of individuals captured at that trawl station.

Figure 9 Schematics of (a) La Pérouse, and (b) MAD-Ridge seamounts listing the most dominant taxa (gelatinous organisms in blue, crustaceans in orange, cephalopods in violet and fishes in yellow) within the cluster groups. The numbers in brackets indicate the number of individuals caught. Organisms are classified as being epi (epipelagic), meso (mesopelagic), bathy (bathypelagic) and benth o (benthopelagic). Echograms of the 38 kHz frequency at sunset, night, sunrise and daytime are denoted by red, blue, violet and gold coloured rectangles respectively. The successive series of DVM events from the intermediate layer and from the SSL are denoted by circular dotted lines. The night SSL and day SSL are denoted by solid and dotted rectangles respectively. The DSL is denoted by solid rectangles. Seamount- associated species and topographic blockage mechanism are also noted. Colour bar indicates Sv in dB re 1 m⁻¹.

Figure 10 (a-d) RGB composites of Sv values (dB re 1 m⁻¹) of trawls 14 and 15 (flank), 16 (summit) and 21 (South Mozambique Channel) during MAD-Ridge. White dotted lines represent the trawl path as determined from Scanmar depth sensor. The seamount summit is denoted by the black polygon and labelled accordingly. The 38 kHz, 70 kHz and 120 kHz frequencies were given red, green and blue colour codes respectively. Corresponding frequency diagrams of the species count and frequency responses for trawls #14, 15, 16 and 21 are given. Broad categories are coloured orange (crustaceans), yellow (fishes), blue (gelatinous organisms), and violet (cephalopods).
a) La Pérouse

Depth (m)

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

b) MAD-Ridge

Depth (m)

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>Figure 1</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Figure 2</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>c)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>d)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>a)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>e)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>h)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>g)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>f)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>Figure 3</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>Figure 4</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_17.png" /><figcaption>b)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /><figcaption>c)</figcaption></figure>

Red: 38 kHz; Green: 70 kHz; Blue: 120 kHz

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /><figcaption>Figure 5</figcaption></figure>
a) Total abundance estimates (ind. m⁻²)

<figure><img src="image_20.png" /></figure>

Total biomass estimates (g WM⁻²)

<figure><img src="image_21.png" /></figure>

b)

Species accumulation curve

<figure><img src="image_22.png" /></figure>

c) La Pérouse

<figure><img src="image_23.png" /></figure>

MAD-Ridge

<figure><img src="image_24.png" /><figcaption>Figure 6</figcaption></figure>
a)

La Pérouse

Group average

Transform: Fourth root

Resemblance: S17 Bray Curtis similarity

<figure><img src="image_25.png" /><figcaption>Figure 7</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_26.png" /><figcaption>Figure 7</figcaption></figure>
c) Deep dwelling organisms at La Pérouse

*Pasiphaea sp. (crustacean)*

<figure><img src="image_27.png" /></figure>

*Argyropelecus aculeatus (fish)*

<figure><img src="image_28.png" /></figure>

d) Seamount flank associated fish species at La Pérouse

*Diaphus suborbitalis*

<figure><img src="image_29.png" /></figure>

*Argyripnus hulleyi*

<figure><img src="image_30.png" /><figcaption>Figure 7</figcaption></figure>
a)

<figure><img src="image_31.png" /><figcaption>Figure 8</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_32.png" /><figcaption>Figure 8</figcaption></figure>
c) Shallow-dwelling and vertical migratory fish at MAD-Ridge

Acanthuridae sp.

<figure><img src="image_33.png" /></figure>

Ceratoscopelus warmingii

<figure><img src="image_34.png" /></figure>

d) Deep-dwelling fish species at MAD-Ridge

Cyclothone sp.

<figure><img src="image_35.png" /></figure>

Argyropelecus aculeatus

<figure><img src="image_36.png" /></figure>

e) Seamount-associated fish species at MAD-Ridge

Diaphus suborbitalis

<figure><img src="image_37.png" /></figure>

Neoscopelus macrolepidotus

<figure><img src="image_38.png" /></figure>

Benthosema fibulatum

<figure><img src="image_39.png" /></figure>

Cookeolus japonicus

<figure><img src="image_40.png" /><figcaption>Figure 8</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_41.png" /><figcaption>Figure 9</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_42.png" /><figcaption>Figure 9</figcaption></figure>
RGB Composites of MAD-Ridge seamount

Red: 38 kHz; Green: 70 kHz; Blue: 120 kHz

<figure><img src="image_43.png" /><figcaption>b) Trawl #15</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_44.png" /><figcaption>c) Trawl #16</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_45.png" /><figcaption>d) Trawl #21</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_46.png" /></figure>

Frequency Diagrams and Frequency
Responses

<figure><img src="image_47.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_48.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_49.png" /><figcaption>Figure 10</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>Table 1 Summary of trawl stations at La Pérouse and MAD-Ridge seamounts</caption><thead><tr><th>Cruise</th><th>Trawl #</th><th>Latitude Beginning (°)</th><th>Longitude Beginning (°)</th><th>Maximum Trawl Depth (m)</th><th>Trawl Position</th><th>Day/Night</th><th>Trawling Speed (knots)</th><th>Filtered water volume (in 1000 m³)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="10">La Pérouse</td><td>1</td><td>-19.77</td><td>54.09</td><td>590</td><td>Vicinity</td><td>Night</td><td>3.0</td><td>837</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>-19.79</td><td>54.10</td><td>400</td><td>Flank</td><td>Night</td><td>3.2</td><td>379</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>-19.65</td><td>53.85</td><td>90</td><td>Vicinity</td><td>Night</td><td>2.7</td><td>444</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>-19.68</td><td>54.15</td><td>110</td><td>Flank</td><td>Night</td><td>3.0</td><td>512</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>-19.76</td><td>54.18</td><td>35</td><td>Summit</td><td>Day</td><td>3.6</td><td>808</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>-19.72</td><td>54.18</td><td>60</td><td>Flank</td><td>Night</td><td>3.0</td><td>485</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>-19.63</td><td>54.10</td><td>500</td><td>Vicinity</td><td>Night</td><td>3.0</td><td>502</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>-19.80</td><td>54.17</td><td>430</td><td>Vicinity</td><td>Night</td><td>3.2</td><td>512</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>-19.81</td><td>54.08</td><td>240</td><td>Vicinity</td><td>Night</td><td>3.2</td><td>622</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>-19.76</td><td>54.21</td><td>250</td><td>Vicinity</td><td>Night</td><td>4.0</td><td>871</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="16">MAD-Ridge</td><td>1</td><td>-27.41</td><td>45.67</td><td>500</td><td>Vicinity (North West)</td><td>Day</td><td>3.2</td><td>228</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>-27.65</td><td>46.43</td><td>542</td><td>Vicinity (North West)</td><td>Night</td><td>2.3</td><td>211</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>-27.44</td><td>46.23</td><td>43</td><td>Vicinity (North West)</td><td>Night</td><td>2.2</td><td>163</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>-27.67</td><td>46.44</td><td>100</td><td>Flank (West)</td><td>Day</td><td>2.8</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>-27.75</td><td>46.28</td><td>324</td><td>Vicinity (South West)</td><td>Night</td><td>2.8</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>-27.69</td><td>46.46</td><td>45</td><td>Flank (South West)</td><td>Night</td><td>2.6</td><td>154</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>-27.64</td><td>46.37</td><td>437</td><td>Vicinity (South West)</td><td>Day</td><td>3.1</td><td>276</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>-27.78</td><td>46.35</td><td>38</td><td>Flank (South)</td><td>Night</td><td>2.7</td><td>240</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>-27.70</td><td>46.45</td><td>76</td><td>Vicinity (South East)</td><td>Night</td><td>2.6</td><td>179</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>-27.60</td><td>46.53</td><td>470</td><td>Flank (North East)</td><td>Day</td><td>2.2</td><td>212</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>-27.69</td><td>46.53</td><td>90</td><td>Flank (North East)</td><td>Night</td><td>2.3</td><td>172</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>-27.41</td><td>46.38</td><td>550</td><td>Vicinity (North)</td><td>Night</td><td>2.8</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>-27.65</td><td>46.31</td><td>460</td><td>Flank (North)</td><td>Day</td><td>3.2</td><td>303</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>-27.68</td><td>46.27</td><td>210</td><td>Flank (West)</td><td>Night</td><td>2.7</td><td>228</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>-27.67</td><td>46.22</td><td>150</td><td>Flank (West)</td><td>Night</td><td>2.1</td><td>187</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>-27.59</td><td>46.32</td><td>205</td><td>Summit</td><td>Night</td><td>3.4</td><td>312</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>-27.51</td><td>46.32</td><td>550</td><td>Vicinity (North West)</td><td>Day</td><td>2.3</td><td>222</td></tr></tbody></table>