# Biosynthesis and Cellular Functions of Tartaric Acid in Grapevines

Crista Burbidge, Christopher Michael Ford, Vanessa Jane Melino, Darren C.J. Wong, Yong Jia, Colin Leslie Dow Jenkins, Kathleen Lydia Soole, Simone Diego Castellarin, Philippe Darriet, Markus Rienth, et al.

► To cite this version:

Crista Burbidge, Christopher Michael Ford, Vanessa Jane Melino, Darren C.J. Wong, Yong Jia, et al. Biosynthesis and Cellular Functions of Tartaric Acid in Grapevines. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12, pp.643024. 10.3389/fpls.2021.643024. hal-03500929

HAL Id: hal-03500929

https://hal.science/hal-03500929

Submitted on 22 Dec 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for
updates

# Biosynthesis and Cellular Functions of Tartaric Acid in Grapevines

Crista Ann Burbidge¹, Christopher Michael Ford², Vanessa Jane Melino³,
Darren Chern Jan Wong⁴, Yong Jia⁵, Colin Leslie Dow Jenkins⁶, Kathleen Lydia Soole⁶,
Simone Diego Castellarin⁷, Philippe Darriet⁸, Markus Rienth⁹, Claudio Bonghi¹⁰,
Robert Peter Walker¹¹, Franco Famiani¹¹ and Crystal Sweetman⁶*

¹ Agriculture and Food, CSIRO, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia, ² School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Urrbrae, SA, Australia, ³ King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia, ⁴ Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia, ⁵ Western Barley Genetic Alliance, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia, ⁶ College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia, ⁷ Wine Research Centre, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, ⁸ Université Bordeaux, Unité de recherche Œnologie, EA 4577, USC 1366 INRAE, Institut des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, Villenave d'Ornon, France, ⁹ University of Sciences and Art Western Switzerland, Changins College for Viticulture and Oenology, Nyon, Switzerland, ¹⁰ Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, Legnaro, Italy, ¹¹ Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy

OPEN ACCESS

**Edited by:**
Dorothea Tholl,
Virginia Tech, United States

**Reviewed by:**
Robert D. Hancock,
The James Hutton Institute,
United Kingdom
Nicholas Smirnoff,
University of Exeter, United Kingdom

**\*Correspondence:**
Crystal Sweetman
crystal.sweetman@flinders.edu.au

**Specialty section:**
This article was submitted to
Plant Metabolism
and Chemodiversity,
a section of the journal
Frontiers in Plant Science

**Received:** 17 December 2020

**Accepted:** 09 February 2021

**Published:** 04 March 2021

**Citation:**
Burbidge CA, Ford CM,
Melino VJ, Wong DCJ, Jia Y,
Jenkins CLD, Soole KL,
Castellarin SD, Darriet P, Rienth M,
Bonghi C, Walker RP, Famiani F and
Sweetman C (2021) Biosynthesis
and Cellular Functions of Tartaric Acid
in Grapevines.
Front. Plant Sci. 12:643024.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.643024

Tartaric acid (TA) is an obscure end point to the catabolism of ascorbic acid (Asc). Here, it is proposed as a “specialized primary metabolite”, originating from carbohydrate metabolism but with restricted distribution within the plant kingdom and lack of known function in primary metabolic pathways. Grapes fall into the list of high TA-accumulators, with biosynthesis occurring in both leaf and berry. Very little is known of the TA biosynthetic pathway enzymes in any plant species, although recently some progress has been made in this space. New technologies in grapevine research such as the development of global co-expression network analysis tools and genome-wide association studies, should enable more rapid progress. There is also a lack of information regarding roles for this organic acid in plant metabolism. Therefore this review aims to briefly summarize current knowledge about the key intermediates and enzymes of TA biosynthesis in grapes and the regulation of its precursor, ascorbate, followed by speculative discussion around the potential roles of TA based on current knowledge of Asc metabolism, TA biosynthetic enzymes and other aspects of fruit metabolism.

**Keywords:** grape, fruit, tartaric acid, metabolism, gene, enzyme, antioxidant

## INTRODUCTION

L-Tartaric acid, (2,3-Dihydroxybutanedioic acid, L-threaric acid, TA) accumulates in comparatively few plant species despite its close structural similarity to many other C₄-dicarboxylates. A product of the oxidation of sugars, in many cases via L-ascorbate (Asc) breakdown, it appears to have no known physiological or biochemical function. In cultivated crops the accumulation of TA is largely non-responsive to stresses or environmental or cultural management practices. A five or six-step synthesis pathway was proposed almost 40 years ago, and whilst candidate enzymes have been characterized for two steps, little is understood about how, where or indeed why this relatively simple compound accumulates in the tissues of just a few plant species (DeBolt et al., 2007).
Scientific interest in TA would likely have been minimal were it not for the happy circumstance that it is the principal acid found in berries of the cultivated grapevine *Vitis vinifera* (Kliewer, 1966). At harvest, there are 4 to 8 grams of TA per L of grape juice, contributing in large part to a pH of 2.9 to 3.8 (Amerine et al., 1965). TA is thereby responsible for much of the 'vitality' of wine, balancing out the inherent sweetness of alcohol on the palate and contributing to low pH conditions needed to enable the wine to age over an appropriate period whilst minimizing spoilage from microbial and oxidative processes (Plane et al., 1980; Zoecklein et al., 1995; Liu et al., 2007).

Notwithstanding its economic and cultural value, important questions remain unanswered about TA. The most widely accepted TA synthesis pathway begins with Asc, although precisely how Asc is converted to 2-keto L-gulonate, the first intermediate in the pathway, remains unknown. Some suggest that the oxidized form of Asc, dehydroascorbate (DHA; a product of ROS scavenging), serves as the precursor (Hancock and Viola, 2005; Melino et al., 2009a). Either way, it would seem an unusual fate for Asc, more commonly referred to as vitamin C, which is better known for its role in regulating the cellular redox state, among other metabolic and signaling processes (Gilbert et al., 2009; Smirnoff, 2011; Foyer et al., 2020). None of the intermediate compounds in the pathway are commonly found in plants, nor do they have roles in alternative pathways. It is therefore to be wondered why five or six enzymes have been retained in grapevine for the sole function of producing a compound with no known role, from a compound with several enormously important roles.

It is of course likely that we are yet to elucidate its function, a fate which for many plant compounds has previously seen them allocated to the category of 'secondary metabolite'. More recent definitions have revised this classification to 'plant specialized metabolites', with the defining characteristics of such compounds being that they are (i) not directly involved in growth or development, (ii) restricted to a narrow set of species, (iii) not necessary for survival and (iv) support stress responses. Additionally, specialized metabolites are classified as either phenolics, alkaloids or terpenes. TA does not fit this latter requirement and may therefore be proposed as a 'specialized primary metabolite', being a product of essentially primary (i.e., carbohydrate) metabolism, but with none of the energy conservation, biosynthetic or regulatory functions normally associated with these biomolecules.

Trending decreases in titratable acidity and increases in pH of grape juice have been observed over time and in response to increased temperatures or other climatic effects (Spayd et al., 2002; de Orduña, 2010; Sadras et al., 2013; Godden et al., 2015). These can lead to the need for acid additions to restore appropriate pH and TA levels if wine quality is to be preserved. This is often a significant expense to winemakers, particularly during warmer growing seasons. In the broader food industry, TA can be used as an additive for its acidic and antioxidant properties (Silva and Lidon, 2016; EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings et al., 2020). Unlike TA, malic acid (MA), which also accumulates in grapes during early development, is susceptible to enzymatic catabolism during ripening, particularly

at high temperatures (Buttrose et al., 1971; Kliewer, 1971; Ruffner et al., 1976). Potassium levels in grape berries can increase with temperature due to increased water uptake, thus exacerbating the effect on pH that arises from the exchange of protons from the vacuole during cation transport (Boulton, 1980; Coombe 1987). With increased pH of juice and must (the mixture of juice, skins and seeds that is fermented to make red wines), larger SO₂ additions may be required to effectively curb the growth of undesirable microbes. This can lead to wines exceeding legal SO₂ thresholds, also affecting wine flavor and aroma (de Orduña, 2010). Several decades of work has explored acidity in winegrapes, including the variation of acidity measured among different *Vitis* species (Stafford, 1959; Kliewer et al., 1967; Shiraishi et al., 2010; reviewed by Dai et al., 2011), *V. vinifera* cultivars (Shiraishi, 1995; Liu et al., 2007) and within populations (Liang et al., 2011; Viana et al., 2013; Duchêne et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015; Houel et al., 2015; Ban, 2016), as well as the metabolic effects of temperature on organic acids in grapes (Kliewer, 1973; Ruffner et al., 1976; Sweetman et al., 2014).

The aim of this review is to summarize new developments in the area of TA accumulation and biosynthesis in grape berries, although some parallels are drawn with other fruits. Furthermore, potential roles of TA in fruit metabolism are proposed, drawing on what is now known of the biosynthetic enzymes and precursors.

## TARTARIC ACID ACCUMULATION IN GRAPE BERRIES (CONCENTRATION AND DISTRIBUTION)

In fruit, TA was once thought to be uniquely accumulated in grapes, but it has since been shown to occur at significant levels in a range of other fruits, including avocado (Pedreschi et al., 2019), lychee (Wang et al., 2006), sweet cherry (Mahmood et al., 2012), blueberry (Li et al., 2015), tamarind (Van den Bilcke et al., 2014), some citrus fruits (Nour et al., 2010) and in one report, banana (Wyman and Palmer, 1964). A tabulated summary is available in a recent review on fruit organic acids (Walker and Famiani, 2018). TA has also been measured in leaves of bean (Saito and Loewus, 1989), tamarind (Lewis and Neelakanthan, 1959), geranium and grapevine (Williams and Loewus, 1978). Recent technological advances have enabled very accurate and high-throughput quantification of organic acids in individual grapes (Melino et al., 2009b; Higginson et al., 2016), revealing large variation in TA concentrations between bunches within a vine and between berries of a single bunch, likely due to asynchronous development of the individual fruit.

Net TA accumulation is exclusive to the first stage of berry development, associated with rapid cell division (Kliewer and Nassar, 1966). Asc shares an almost identical developmental accumulation pattern although at approximately one-fiftieth the concentration (Melino et al., 2009a; Cholet et al., 2016). TA biosynthesis reactions are thought to occur in the cytosol of plant cells (Pignocchi et al., 2003), however the proposed involvement of transketolase and succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase in late steps (Salusjärvi et al., 2004; DeBolt et al., 2006), as well as a
protein localization study of the L-idonate dehydrogenase (Wen et al., 2010), discussed in later sections, suggest that additional cellular compartments and even the apoplast may be involved in grape TA biosynthesis. Once synthesized, TA resides in the vacuole (DeBolt et al., 2004).

Accumulation of TA occurs in all V. vinifera cultivars and across the Vitaceae family (Stafford, 1959). TA levels in V. vinifera fruit are largely unaffected by environmental conditions other than in a small handful of studies that report responses to light (Melino et al., 2011; Reshef et al., 2017), water deficit (Grimplet et al., 2009; Savoi et al., 2017), fertilization with silicon and calcium chloride (Gomes et al., 2020), grafting onto different rootstocks (Zhang et al., 2020b) and seasonal variability due to water status and light exposure (Cholet et al., 2016). Notwithstanding these reports, there is no evidence that any one or combination of cultural practices can be used to modulate levels of TA in berries at harvest.

The search for QTLs relating to grape berry acidity has seen a lot of activity in the last decade, with some promising breakthroughs for total or titratable acidity (Liang et al., 2011; Duchêne et al., 2014; Ban, 2016), pH (Viana et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2015), MA (Chen et al., 2015; Duchêne et al., 2020) and various acid ratios in young berries (Houel et al., 2015), however in most cases there was no satisfactory marker for TA level (Liang et al., 2011; Viana et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2015; Bayo-Canha et al., 2019). This may be due to the involvement of several biochemical steps and potential sites of regulation, as well as other factors that affect berry acid levels such as potassium accumulation (Duchêne et al., 2020). Despite these challenges, two major QTLs for TA concentration on linkage groups LG7 and LG4 were stably detected using a Picovine x Ugni Blanc flb population under different environmental conditions (Houel et al., 2015). Most of the above QTL analyses were based on mapping within bi-parental populations, which may be restricted by the limited genetic diversity between the specific parental varieties or species. Therefore, the selection of appropriate crossing parents may be critical for the success of TA QTL studies. In addition, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that exploit the great genetic and phenotypic diversities of large grapevine germplasm collections deserve more attention for the study of complex biological traits such as TA accumulation. This approach is becoming increasingly feasible for woody species like grapevine (c.f. cereal crops), due to the lower costs of high-throughput sequencing and phenotyping techniques. Recently, GWAS analyses of 472 Vitis accessions (Liang et al., 2019) and 279 V. vinifera L. cultivars (Flutre et al., 2020), were employed to identify loci associated with traits including TA accumulation, detailed further in Section 9.

## BIOSYNTHETIC ENZYMES OF TARTARIC ACID

Three pathways of TA biosynthesis occur in higher plants, each identified by the precursor and cleavage site, namely “Asc C4/C5,” “Asc C2/C3,” and “D-gluconic acid C4/C5,” (Loewus, 1999), the former being the primary pathway in grape and described in

detail by Ford (2012). Briefly, in the Asc C4/C5 pathway (depicted in **Figure 1**), Asc is converted by one or more uncharacterized steps to 2-keto L-gulonate and thence via reduction to L-idonate and oxidation to form 5-keto D-gluconate. This six-carbon intermediate is cleaved by an unknown enzyme to yield a four-carbon intermediate, possible tartaric acid semialdehyde that is finally oxidized to produce TA. In the Asc C2/C3 pathway, Asc is cleaved between carbons two and three: the two-carbon fragment forms oxalic acid and the four-carbon fragment forms L-threonic acid which is subsequently oxidized to form TA. The D-gluconic acid C4/C5 pathway, which has been identified in leguminous species, has a direct conversion of D-gluconic acid to 5-keto-D-gluconic acid via an unidentified oxidation step, whereafter the formation of TA is thought to occur by the same steps as proposed for the Asc C4/C5 pathway. The sequence of redox-associated steps in the confirmed reactions of TA synthesis, which may feature also in the conversion of Asc to 2-keto L-gulonate and in the steps leading from 5-keto D-gluconate, has been suggested to reflect a common strategy in the generation of phytochemical diversity (Horn, 2021).

By feeding labeled Asc to immature berries of a number of species from the Vitaceae family it was determined that [1-¹⁴C]Asc and [4-¹⁴C]Asc corresponded to the C1 and C4 carbons respectively of the TA skeleton (Williams and Loewus, 1978). Earlier studies that identified the key intermediates and organization of the C4/C5 pathway (Saito and Kasai, 1969; Wagner and Loewus, 1974; Wagner et al., 1975) were complemented by later work identifying the final intermediates (Saito and Kasai, 1982, 1984). Accumulation of radiolabeled L-idonate in grapevine leaves also fed with labeled Asc confirmed that the oxidation of L-idonate to 5-keto-gluconic acid is a rate-limiting step of TA synthesis (Malipiero et al., 1987).

Non-targeted metabolomics studies in grape berries provide opportunities to look for accumulation of other intermediates under a range of conditions, however our own search of published metabolomics datasets for the purpose of this review, turned up little evidence. One report showed developmental and temperature regulation of ketogluconate levels (Gouot et al., 2019), but it is unclear which isomer(s) were present in the analysis. Although the steps of the “Asc C4/C5” pathway were identified decades ago, further work on the biosynthesis of TA in grape berries and identification of the enzymes responsible has been limited (Ford, 2012), but some recent findings warrant summarizing.

## L-Idonate Dehydrogenase

L-idonate dehydrogenase (L-IDH) catalyzes the above-mentioned “rate-limiting” step of L-idonate to 5-keto-gulonic acid (Figure 1) and was the first enzyme of the TA biosynthetic pathway to be identified and characterized (DeBolt et al., 2006). In V. vinifera there are three L-IDH isoforms, which are co-located on chromosome 16 but only one (VvLIDH3; Q1PSI9; VIT_16s0100g00290) has been shown definitively to oxidize L-idonate (DeBolt et al., 2006; Sweetman et al., 2012; Higginson et al., 2016). VvLIDH1 (ABA01327) has a very high sequence identity to VvLIDH3 with only three like-for-like (e.g., hydrophobic-for-hydrophobic or neutral) amino
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**FIGURE 1** | Biosynthetic and redox pathways of ascorbic acid and tartaric acid in the plant cell. Chloroplastic ascorbate redox reactions are omitted from this schematic. Black arrows/metabolites/enzymes represent ascorbate biosynthesis steps. Green represents ascorbate recycling pathways in various cell compartments. Orange represents tartrate biosynthesis pathway. Dashed arrows or boxes indicate hypothetical reactions or enzymes. Enzyme abbreviations as follows. PMI phosphomannose isomerase, PMM phosphomannomutase, VTC1 GDP-D-mannose pyrophosphorylase, GME GDP-D-mannose epimerase, VTC2 GDP-galactose phosphorylase, VTC4 L-galactose-1-phosphate phosphatase, L-GalDH L-galactose dehydrogenase, GLDH L-galactonolactone dehydrogenase, MIPS myo-inositol-3-phosphate synthase, MIOX myo-inositol oxidase, GluUR D-glucuronic acid reductase, AL(gul) aldono-lactonase for L-gulonate, GLOX L-gulonolactone oxidase, GalUR D-galacturonic acid reductase, AL(gal) aldono-lactonase for L-galactonate, MDAR monodehydroascorbate reductase, DHAR dehydroascorbate peroxidase, APX ascorbate peroxidase, GR glutathione reductase, AO ascorbate oxidase, 2KGR 2-ketogulonic acid reductase, L-IDH L-idonate dehydrogenase, TSDH tartaric acid semialdehyde dehydrogenase, TK transketolase, ALMT aluminum-activated malate transporter, cytB Cytochrome B561. Figure adapted from Melino et al. (2009a), Burbidge (2011), and Podgórska et al. (2017).
acid substitutions at non-critical sites (Higginson, 2015; Jia, 2015). *VvLidh1* and *VvLidh3* transcripts both show preferential expression in young fruit (Deluc et al., 2007; Melino et al., 2009a; Sweetman et al., 2012; Rienth et al., 2014; Massonnet et al., 2017), thus aligning with the timing of TA accumulation. This may be seasonally dependent in some cultivars such as Trincadeira (Fortes et al., 2011), although it is unclear whether the microarray used in this study could discriminate between the three *VvLidh* isoforms. Data from another study using microarray data and potted vines in climate chambers suggest that *VvLidh3* may be up-regulated at night in ripening berries (Rienth et al., 2014).

Development of an antibody to L-IDH (*VvLIDH3* peptide was used as a target but the antibody was not checked for cross-reactivity against the other isoforms) and an enzyme assay compatible with berry extracts enabled the first observations that the L-IDH protein and its activity peak during early berry development, similar to transcript levels of both *VvLidh1* and *VvLidh3*, but linger during ripening (Wen et al., 2010, 2014; Cholet et al., 2016). Given the persistence of the protein beyond the period of TA accumulation, post-translational mechanisms such as protein degradation or sequestration of the enzyme by vacuolar autophagy (Wen et al., 2010), feedback inhibition (Cholet et al., 2016), or the availability of precursors (Melino et al., 2009a, 2011) may explain the cessation of TA accumulation at veraison. Wen et al. (2010) suggested that L-IDH continues to function in the berry vacuole during ripening: if so, it must occur at a low rate, with optimal pH of the recombinant enzyme between pH 8 and 9 and a five-fold drop in specific activity at pH 7 (DeBolt, 2006; Jia, 2015).

Berries of the wild Chinese grapevine *Ampelopsis aconitifolia* lack *Lidh* transcripts and TA (DeBolt et al., 2006), suggesting that L-IDH is essential for TA biosynthesis. Wen et al. (2014) showed that the transcript levels of *Lidh* (in this case a combination of *VvLidh3* and *VvLidh1* orthologs, as it is difficult to design unique primer sets) did not correlate with berry TA levels across *Vitis* species but instead, a high TA accumulator had a slower decline of the L-IDH protein throughout ripening as compared to a lower TA-accumulator. However, it is important to factor in berry size, which can differ significantly across species and cultivars, exerting a dilution effect on the TA content of berries. This warrants further analysis of the data by Wen et al. (2014). In one of the first successful CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis studies in grapevine, disruption of *VvLidh3* led to a decrease, but not a total loss of TA in Chardonnay cell cultures (Ren et al., 2016). The authors suggested that residual TA synthesis could be symptomatic of the type of mutation (i.e., no frameshift) or due to a combination of wild type and transgenic cells present within the cell mass. Complementary activity from the *VvLIDH1* isoform might also explain this, unless the guide RNA could not discriminate between both copies and thereby both isoforms were edited within the same cell.

L-IDH enzymes have recently been classified as “Class II” plant sorbitol dehydrogenases (SDH), with a set of key amino acid residues (His42, Gly112, and Ser113) likely responsible for the evolutionary diversification from sorbitol to L-idonate substrate binding and oxidation (Jia et al., 2015). These key residues are conserved in *VvLIDH1* and *VvLIDH3* but not *VvLIDH2*, which

is instead designated as a “Class I” SDH and likely involved in sorbitol metabolism rather than TA biosynthesis. Residues predicted to be important for L-idonate selectivity have also been highlighted in the L-IDH ortholog of the TA-accumulating geranium (Narnoliya et al., 2018). The expression patterns of the Class I and Class II SDHs of grapevine also differ, with the former increasing throughout development and the latter aligning more closely with the timing of TA biosynthesis, i.e., decreasing throughout development (Sweetman et al., 2012; Jia et al., 2015; Cholet et al., 2016). *VvLidh1* and *VvLidh3* are genetically linked at 10 kb apart, in the same orientation on chromosome 16, whereas *VvLidh2* is also situated nearby but in the opposite orientation (Higginson, 2015; Jia et al., 2015), suggesting regulation by different promoters.

In apple and sweet orange, the presence of putative L-IDH orthologs did not equate to TA accumulation, leading to some doubt as to the importance of L-IDH in TA biosynthesis (Shangguan et al., 2015). Upon closer inspection of the apple genome, 11 of the 12 potential orthologs had low sequence similarity to the confirmed *VvLIDH3* and importantly, they lacked the key residues identified by Jia et al. (2015) and Narnoliya et al. (2018). That is, only one copy of a Class II plant SDH is present in apple and sweet orange (Jia et al., 2015) and the Class I SDHs may not catalyze the L-idonate oxidation reaction. The only “Class I” SDH to be tested for L-IDH activity, COC280 (Uniprot: A0A061FZU3) from *Theobroma cacao* did not display any convincing oxidation of L-idonate despite its close homology to *VvLIDH3* (Jia, 2015). Therefore, the enzymatic function of these L-IDH orthologs remains undetermined. With respect to the lack of TA in apple and sweet orange, low expression of proteins responsible for upstream steps of the pathway could also conceivably deprive these fruits of L-idonate precursors, an avenue yet to be explored. Therefore L-IDH remains the best-characterized enzyme of the grape berry TA biosynthesis pathway.

## 2-Keto-L-Gulonic Acid Reductase

Efforts to identify enzymes responsible for other steps of the TA biosynthesis pathway have proven challenging, however some progress has been made toward the 2-keto-L-gulonic reductase (2-KGR; VIT_09s0002g04300), which precedes the L-IDH step (Figure 1). A grape gene with homology to the *Escherichia coli* 2-KGR from Yum et al. (1998) showed the same developmental expression pattern as *VvLidh3* (Burbidge, 2011). The recombinant enzyme had 2-KGR activity, however substrate affinity kinetics favored the enzyme as a glyoxylate or hydroxypyruvate reductase that may have additional activity as a 2-KGR (Burbidge, 2011; Jia et al., 2019). Indeed, in plants the grape *Vv2KGR* has the highest sequence similarity with the cytosolic *Arabidopsis thaliana* hydroxypyruvate reductase isoform 2 (*AtHPR2*), which acts as a compensatory bypass for hydroxypyruvate and glyoxylate reduction (Timm et al., 2008). However, recombinantly expressed *Vv2KGR* was also active, albeit far less efficiently, with L-idonate (i.e., the reverse reaction) as well as Asc, formate, sorbitol, D-glucose, 6-phosphogluconate, 5-keto-D-gluconate and D-gluconate (Burbidge, 2011). Subsequently, the protein structure of *Vv2KGR*
was resolved using x-ray crystallography, and molecular docking studies revealed 2-keto-L-gulonate as the optimal substrate, while GC-MS confirmed the product of this reaction as L-idonate (Jia et al., 2019). Based on *in vitro* studies this enzyme may be considered a 2-KGR that has been commandeered from another metabolic pathway. Both *Vv2KGR* and *VvLIDH3* retain significant “original” enzyme activities, i.e., HP/glyoxylate reduction and sorbitol oxidation, respectively (Jia, 2015; Jia et al., 2019). This is a common observation for gene evolution via duplication, in which the newly duplicated genes evolve novel functions while still retaining their original functions (Flagel and Wendel, 2009).

## Intracellular Transporters

Once synthesized, TA is translocated to the vacuole for storage. An aluminum-activated malate transporter (ALMT) protein, encoded by *VvAlmt9* (XM_002275959), is likely to shuttle both TA and MA into the vacuole (Patel, 2008; Rongala, 2008; De Angeli et al., 2013). It is expressed throughout berry development but highest in ripe fruit according to transcriptomic data from Shiraz berries (Sweetman et al., 2012) and qPCR data from Aragonez berries (De Angeli et al., 2013), therefore its activity is likely to remain important long after net accumulation of MA and TA.

At present there are no candidates for TA transport at any other membrane of the plant cell but there are some candidates for transport of the precursor, Asc. There are twelve candidate genes for nucleobase ascorbate transporters (NAT) in Arabidopsis, three of which (*AtNat7*, *8* and *12*) are localized to the plasma membrane and at least one in the thylakoid membrane. However, it is unknown if these transport Asc or nucleobases (Maurino et al., 2006; reviewed by Foyer et al., 2020). A chloroplast envelope transporter of Asc (*AtPht4:4*) has also been identified (Miyaji et al., 2015), and chloroplast uptake is dependent on membrane potential and cytosolic Asc concentration. There is little understanding of the mechanisms by which Asc travels from its site of synthesis in the mitochondrion throughout the berry cell.

## TA CATABOLISM

Endogenous TA in the grape berry is not catabolized at any appreciable rate (Ruffner, 1982). Instead, it is widely accepted that the acid forms a stable salt of potassium bitartrate, which is sequestered in the vacuole away from potential catabolizing enzymes and thereby essentially untouched throughout ripening (Takimoto et al., 1976; Moskowitz and Hrazdina, 1981; Ruffner, 1982; DeBolt et al., 2004). However, degradation of exogenously applied radiolabeled TA could be recovered as CO₂ from excised grape berries, suggesting that TA-catabolizing enzymes do exist in *V. vinifera* (Hrazdina et al., 1984). *E. coli* and *Pseudomonas* spp. can use D-tartrate as a carbon source via oxidation to oxaloacetate or glycerate and eventually pyruvate (Vaughn et al., 1946; Dagley and Trudgill, 1963; Kohn and Jakoby, 1968). L-tartrate, the isomer present in grapes, can be used for carbon fixation by *Agrobacterium vitis*; a bacterium that harbors genes

for TA-metabolizing enzymes and is hosted by *V. vinifera* (Otten et al., 1995). L-tartrate from grape must can also be catabolized by *Botrytis cinerea*, resulting in several different organic acids including malate, pyruvate, acetate, oxalate and oxaloacetate (Shimazu et al., 1984). Therefore, while the berry is intact, TA remains sheltered from catabolism; however, upon its release from the vacuole via mechanical damage (i.e., during harvest and crush), or upon pathogen invasion, TA likely becomes susceptible to catabolic enzymes from such microorganisms.

## ASCORBATE AS A PRECURSOR FOR TA BIOSYNTHESIS

In plants, Asc is amongst the major vital antioxidants and fulfils a plethora of functions in different cellular components (Smirnoff, 2011; Foyer et al., 2020). For example, Asc acts as an enzyme cofactor and modulator of enzyme activity in the thylakoid membrane (Müller-Moulé et al., 2004), a reducing agent in the chloroplast (Krieger-Liszkay et al., 2008), a substrate for ethylene biosynthesis (Mirica and Klinman, 2008), and has roles in regulation of cell expansion, fruit-ripening and softening in the apoplast (Green and Fry, 2005; Gilbert et al., 2009). Physiological roles of Asc in plants also include defense (Conklin et al., 1996), growth and development (Dowdle et al., 2007), hormone and pathogen responses (Pastori et al., 2003) and programmed cell death (de Pinto et al., 2006). The redox couple Asc to DHA can influence the cellular redox state, which may be an important component in ROS signaling (Foyer and Noctor, 2005; Noctor, 2006).

Asc does not accumulate to high quantities in grapes compared to some other fruits, for example, ripe Shiraz grapes contain approximately 0.7 µmol.g⁻¹ FW (Melino et al., 2009b) which is significantly lower than ripe strawberries (3.37 µmol.g⁻¹ FW) and kiwifruits (3.41 µmol.g⁻¹ FW) (Davey et al., 2000). It is not known for certain whether low Asc accumulators have a lower rate of Asc biosynthesis or an increased turn-over capacity, although *A. aconitifolia* berries, which do not accumulate TA, contain 3-fold more ascorbate compared to *V. vinifera* cv. Cabernet Sauvignon (DeBolt et al., 2006). Therefore, TA may primarily function to catabolize excess Asc, as recently proposed by Cholet et al. (2016) and blocking the TA biosynthetic pathway may increase vitamin C content in *V. vinifera* berries. Considering that there is no sudden accumulation of Asc at the conclusion of net TA biosynthesis in grapes, but there is reduced transcription of Asc biosynthetic genes in the Smirnoff-Wheeler pathway, a halt in the biosynthesis of Asc is a likely contributor to the plateau in TA levels from veraison (Melino et al., 2009a).

## DEHYDROASCORBATE AS A PRECURSOR FOR TA BIOSYNTHESIS

Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) catalyzes the two-electron oxidation of Asc, reducing hydrogen peroxide (a potent ROS that can inactivate CO₂-fixation enzymes) to water and forming DHA (via monodehydroascorbate, MDHA) in numerous cellular
compartments. Asada (1992) described the value of regenerating reduced Asc as two-fold: to maintain capacity to donate electrons for the reduction of hydrogen peroxide and to protect against inactivation of APX.

In very young grape berries (10 days after flowering), over 70% of ¹⁴C from exogenously applied Asc was recovered within TA (Saito and Kasai, 1969). Generally, the reduced form of Asc is considered the fundamental precursor of TA in the cytosol due to its vast predominance over oxidized forms in the cell (Smirnoff, 2018). However, the cellular location of TA biosynthesis has not yet been definitively shown. Radiolabelling studies may largely represent apoplastic events due to the methods of radiolabel application (Smirnoff, 2018) and in the apoplast the Asc pool is rapidly oxidized to DHA (Pignocchi et al., 2003). Hancock and Viola (2005) proposed DHA as an important intermediate of TA biosynthesis; also labeled a “branch-point” for Asc catabolism by Parsons et al. (2011). When fed to grapevine leaf apices, radiolabeled DHA led to 2KGA, L-idonate and ultimately TA in a similar manner to radiolabeled Asc (Saito and Kasai, 1984). This suggests DHA as an intermediate in the conversion of L-Asc to 2KGA, a reaction that at the present time remains to be characterized. DHA catabolism to oxalic acid (OA) and other products in the culture media of Rosa cells suggest that such Asc catabolism can occur via DHA in the apoplast (Green and Fry, 2005). In grapes, OA and TA both accumulate within the same cells and demonstrate strikingly similar developmental accumulation profiles that show highest biosynthesis at a time when ascorbate is predominantly in the oxidized form (DeBolt et al., 2004; Melino et al., 2009a). During ripening, when net TA accumulation no longer occurs, there is a gradual shift to the reduced form (i.e., increased Asc to DHA ratio), likely due to decreased transcription of key genes responsible for Asc biosynthesis and increased transcription of genes responsible for recycling Asc from its oxidized forms (Melino et al., 2009a). There is also a substantial increase in the concentration and reduction state of glutathione (Adams and Liyanage, 1993; Okuda and Yokotsuka, 1999), which may redirect DHA toward Asc recycling and away from catabolic processes. Further correlative support arises through different grapevine tissues: roots have a small and highly reduced ascorbate pool (Asc to DHA ratio of 13.4) and accumulate little or no TA as compared to berries, rachis and leaves which have an Asc to DHA ratio of 1.1, 1.9, and 2.6 respectively (Kliewer, 1966; Melino et al., 2009b).

# POTENTIAL ROLES OF TA IN GRAPE BERRIES BASED ON PREDECESSORS OF TA BIOSYNTHETIC ENZYMES

## An Incidental Route to TA Accumulation?

As new enzymes of the TA biosynthesis pathway are uncovered, it will be interesting to see if these too are adapted from, or closely related to orthologs from other metabolic pathways, as proposed for L-IDH and 2-KGR. If so, TA accumulation could be a consequence of unrelated biochemical phenomena: high expression of enzyme isoforms that primarily catalyze

other reactions but have adapted to recognize TA precursors as substrates, and where low affinity can be overcome by high precursor concentration (Melino et al., 2009a; Jia et al., 2015, 2019). That is, enzymes from other metabolic pathways could become “hijacked” when DHA or Asc levels are high, provided a particular (as yet unidentified) set of primary metabolic pathways are operating. This “incidental” route of TA biosynthesis might explain the narrow distribution of TA in the plant kingdom and the specific developmental pattern of accumulation in grape berries. Even the ALMT responsible for TA uptake into the vacuole (Terrier et al., 1998; De Angeli et al., 2013) could have been adapted from an exclusively MA transport function. Such evolution of a metabolic pathway is not unheard of in plants and may not mean that the pathway is unimportant: consider the glycolate pathway, adopted by modification of probably existing enzymes, now occurring in at least three organelles and cytosol, and essential in dealing with oxygenic photosynthesis (reviewed by Fernie and Bauwe, 2020).

From what we have garnered of grape berry TA biosynthetic enzymes so far, one enzyme (Vv2KGR) probably diverged from, or shares functionality with, a hydroxypyruvate or glyoxylate reductase (Jia et al., 2019) while another (VvLIDH3) diverged from a sorbitol dehydrogenase (Jia et al., 2015). The functions of these precursor enzymes will be explored below, to speculate on potential roles or reasons for TA biosynthesis in grape berries. Importantly, TA is also synthesized in grapevine leaves, likely by the same C4/C5 cleavage pathway found in grape berries (Williams and Loewus, 1978). Therefore, the roles of these divergent or promiscuous enzymes (outside of TA biosynthesis) are likely to be common between young berries and leaves. A role in photosynthesis or photorespiration seems most likely.

## A Sink for Ascorbate – The Hydroxypyruvate/Glyoxylate Reductase Alternative

Hydroxypyruvate reductase catalyzes the reversible conversion between hydroxypyruvate and glycerate in the peroxisome accompanied by the oxidation of NADH to NAD⁺. This reaction is essential during carbon recovery in photorespiration (Fernie and Bauwe, 2020). Glyoxylate reductase converts glyoxylate to glycolate in the cytosol, oxidizing NADPH to NADP⁺, and probably participates in the removal of toxic glyoxylate leaked from peroxisomes (Zhang et al., 2020a). Interestingly, these two activities arise from the same enzyme, along with 2-KGR activity. Considering the proposed dual roles of 2-KGR in reactions related to photorespiration, early reports of increased TA levels in light-exposed grape berries (Saito and Kasai, 1969; DeBolt et al., 2006) would seem to support a function for this enzyme in its synthesis. However, further investigation of berries grown for extended periods in light-excluding boxes suggested that the regulation by light applies also to the biosynthesis of Asc and that the transcription of VvLidh3 was unaffected by light (Melino et al., 2011). These observations complicate the story, the light-mediated effects on ascorbate probably act to provide antioxidant buffering when ROS-generating photosynthetic activities are high. Only immature grape berries are capable of photosynthesis
(Ollat and Gaudillère, 2000), coinciding with the timing of TA accumulation, which may therefore act as a sink for excess Asc as recently proposed elsewhere (Cholet et al., 2016). However, while the over-exposure of ripening berries to light caused depletion of Asc and glutathione levels, likely due to oxidation (DHA was not measured), there was no effect on TA levels (Rustioni et al., 2020).

## An Osmolyte – The Sorbitol Dehydrogenase Alternative

SDHs oxidize sorbitol and other sugar alcohols such as xylitol and ribitol to their corresponding monosaccharides (i.e., fructose, xylulose, and ribulose), reducing NAD(P)⁺ to NAD(P)H in the cytosol (Aguayo et al., 2013). Sorbitol is the main form of translocated sugar in some plants (mostly Rosaceae), though *V. vinifera* transports predominantly sucrose instead, and does not accumulate sorbitol to a high level (Swanson and El-Shishiny, 1958). In water-deficit conditions, grape berry SDH activity is down regulated, allowing sorbitol levels to increase (Conde et al., 2015). Knockdown of SDH in Arabidopsis led to improved tolerance to drought stress, likely due to osmo-protection from the higher levels of sorbitol (Aguayo et al., 2013). TA has also been suggested to enhance osmotic potential, especially in pre-veraison berries (Bigard et al., 2018) where it can be responsible for over 50% of total berry osmolarity, followed by MA at approximately 25% (Diakou et al., 1997). In the fruits of *Citrus reticulata*, *C. sinensis* and *C. paradisi*, treatment with proline (a stress-induced amino acid and osmo-protectant) led to decreased levels of TA, H₂O₂, and MDA (a lipid peroxidation product indicative of oxidative stress), as well as decreased lipoxygenase activity and increased APX activity (Mohammadrezakhani et al., 2019). In this case, excess proline may have reduced the need for other osmoprotective or ROS-protective mechanisms such as TA biosynthesis. Support for an osmo-protectant role of TA in grape and other fruits is merely correlative but warrants a targeted investigation.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**FIGURE 2** | Correlation between (A) tartaric acid and (B) oxalic acid, with total ascorbate across *V. vinifera* c.v. Shiraz berry developmental series. Data points are labeled with physiological stage of berry (days after flowering). Correlation analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 5.01. The spearman correlation coefficients (rs) are 0.6486 and 0.4466, respectively. Adapted from Melino (2009).

## POTENTIAL ROLES OF TA IN GRAPE BERRIES BASED ON PRECURSORS OF THE TA BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAY

### An Incidental or Dedicated Route to TA Accumulation?

In young grape berries a significant proportion of Asc is present as DHA (i.e., a low Asc to DHA ratio), which is engaged in the biosynthesis of OA and TA (Melino et al., 2009a). There is a strong positive correlation between the accumulation of total ascorbate (the sum of reduced and oxidized forms), and TA or OA in young berries (Figure 2). A regulatory link between total ascorbate levels and *VvLidh3* transcription has been proposed, and it follows that TA biosynthesis could be a storage mechanism for excess Asc or DHA under certain conditions (Cholet et al., 2016), generating an osmolyte that is sequestered in the vacuole during times of high Asc biosynthesis. Such a role is also consistent with the substantial accumulation of TA in grapevine leaves (Ruffner, 1982). This may support the

hypothesized “incidental” route of TA biosynthesis, whereby the availability of precursors (i.e., Asc or DHA) is the limiting factor.

### Apoplastic Redox State, ROS Signaling and Cell Wall Softening

Additional roles for TA in grape berries may be found in the apoplast where it co-exists with other organic acids including Asc, OA and MA, as well as sugars and cations such as potassium (Wada et al., 2008; Keller and Shrestha, 2014; Podgórska et al., 2017). In leaves, the apoplast can contain up to 10% of the total cellular Asc content but this is highly oxidized due to the activity of ascorbate oxidase (AO), localized to the cell wall (Pignocchi et al., 2003; Karpinska et al., 2018). Although AO activity is enhanced by photosynthetic O₂ (De Tullio et al., 2007), excessive AO activity can impair photosynthesis (Karpinska et al., 2018). In tobacco, high AO activity also led to the accumulation of apoplastic threonate, a DHA degradation product (Karpinska et al., 2018). The genome of *V. vinifera* (cv Pinot Noir) contains an unusually large
number of genes encoding AO (9 copies) and APX (12 copies) compared to Arabidopsis (3 and 6 copies, respectively) and sweet orange (2 and 5 copies, respectively). Transcript levels of at least three AO genes (*VvAO1*, VIT_06s0009g01320; *VvAO3*, VIT_07s0031g01010; and *VvAO4*, VIT_07s0031g01040) followed a consistent developmental down-regulation in the grape berry (Fasoli et al., 2012; Sweetman et al., 2012; Savoi et al., 2017), analogous to the pattern of TA accumulation. In young *V. vinifera* berries with their multitude of AO genes and highly oxidized ascorbate pool, the accumulation of TA (instead of, or in addition to threonate) in the presence of light and photosynthetic O₂, could provide an avenue for DHA degradation, in an attempt to balance the redox state of the apoplastic Asc pool.

The redox state of the apoplastic Asc pool is involved in ROS signaling (reviewed by Podgórska et al., 2017; Karpinska et al., 2018; Smirnoff, 2018). Signal transmission from the environment requires that some of the apoplastic Asc is kept in an 'active' (reduced) state (Pignocchi and Foyer, 2003), while an oxidized apoplastic Asc pool (i.e., high DHA) can inhibit photosynthesis and cell division but promote cell elongation and cell wall loosening (Pignocchi and Foyer, 2003; Pignocchi et al., 2003; Sanmartín et al., 2003; Karpinska et al., 2018). In tomato fruit, at the beginning of ripening Asc is excreted from the cell to the apoplast where it can generate hydroxyl radicals by reacting with H₂O₂ in the presence of ascorbate peroxidase, facilitating non-enzymatic degradation of polysaccharides in the cell wall and thus cell expansion (Dumville and Fry, 2003; Green and Fry, 2005). On the other hand, upon entry into the cell as a signal from the apoplast, DHA can slow cell cycle and proliferation in tobacco cell cultures (de Pinto et al., 1999; Potters et al., 2000). Reduction of DHA to Asc can apparently only occur in the cytosol, likely due to the lack of NADH and NADPH in the apoplast (Pignocchi and Foyer, 2003). Therefore, a specific transporter that can exchange apoplastic DHA for cytosolic Asc (Horemans et al., 2008), could simultaneously facilitate inhibition of cell division and enhancement of cell expansion – hallmarks of fruit ripening. It follows that TA biosynthesis could postpone cell wall loosening by catabolizing Asc (or DHA) in the apoplast. Based on transcriptomic datasets, higher transcription of *VvLidh3* may be associated with the firmer berries of Red Globe compared to soft berries of Muscat Hamburg (Ma et al., 2020). This transcript was also upregulated in berries afflicted with shrivel compared to non-shriveled berries co-existing on the same Zweigelt vines (Savoi et al., 2019). From veraison, phloem unloading into the berry switches from a symplastic route to apoplastic (Zhang et al., 2006), flooding the apoplast with high concentrations of hexoses and other solutes, potentially interrupting TA biosynthesis at the cell wall. Changes in apoplastic solutes affect cell turgor and berry firmness associated with veraison and necessary for ripening (Wada et al., 2008; Keller and Shrestha, 2014; Rogiers et al., 2017), as also seen in other fruits (Canton et al., 2020).

Although TA synthesis could take place in either or both cytosol and apoplast, further work is needed to confirm the apoplast as a site of synthesis. If a significant proportion of TA is synthesized in the apoplast there must be a transport mechanism for entry into the cell, to enable accumulation in the vacuole. Identification and characterization of this, and other transporters

of the grape plasmalemma will help to determine DHA import kinetics and a mechanism for TA import, if it exists.

## Antioxidant Metabolism and the Oxidative Burst

ROS, antioxidants and their interactions are key to regulating fruit developmental stages and ripening (Muñoz and Munné-Bosch, 2018; Decros et al., 2019). Despite being classified as a non-climacteric fruit, grapes exhibit an oxidative burst in the skin cells as the berries begin to soften but prior to color change (Pilati et al., 2007). The ROS in this oxidative burst accumulate as superoxide in the chloroplast and hydrogen peroxide in the cytosol (Pilati et al., 2014). Hydrogen peroxide, when applied to bunches of young berries can also advance ripening (Guo et al., 2019). The mechanism by which hydrogen peroxide accumulates in the cytosol is unknown but a loss of catalase activity is unlikely to explain it (Pilati et al., 2014). Most likely it originates from another organelle and is transported to the cytosol via aquaporins (Bienert et al., 2006; Smirnoff and Arnaud, 2019).

Hydrogen peroxide accumulation may be a side-effect from the removal of superoxide from the chloroplast or from the loss of photosynthetic functionality. Alternatively, hydrogen peroxide could be released from the peroxisomes/glyoxysomes or mitochondria for example during photorespiration or oxidation of excess reducing equivalents that have exited the chloroplast (Smirnoff and Arnaud, 2019). Pilati et al. (2014) also speculate that it may signal a temporary switch to fermentative respiration. In any case it likely relies on the activity of a superoxide dismutase (SOD), of which isoforms are present in almost all organelles (Alscher et al., 2002). Up-regulation of a SOD transcript (VIT_214s0030g00950) has been reported at veraison in berries of both Kyoho and its early ripening mutant Fengzao (Guo et al., 2016). Despite considerable differences in ripening time between the two cultivars, the SOD transcript began to accumulate in skins of both cultivars at the initiation of berry softening and peaked at the initiation of berry coloring. It was unclear what type of SOD isoform this gene encoded, although a follow-up study found transcriptional up-regulation of a putative cytosolic Cu/Zn-SOD (Vitvi14g02607) and a putative mitochondrial MnSOD (Vitvi13g00177) in veraison berries of both cultivars (Guo et al., 2020). This work would benefit from more biological replication and expansion to other cultivars, and it would be of great interest to know which organelle generates the hydrogen peroxide that is involved in regulating berry ripening.

The accumulation of ROS is followed by a surge in the appearance of ROS-detoxification transcripts and their cognate proteins including ascorbate and glutathione peroxidases, ascorbate oxidase, catalase, polyphenol oxidase, peroxiredoxins, thioredoxins, glutaredoxins, glutathione-S-transferases, metallothioneins, tocopherol cyclase and lipoxygenases (Jimenez et al., 2002; Pilati et al., 2007, 2014; Negri et al., 2008; Agudelo-Romero et al., 2013; Rienth et al., 2014). During ripening, increases in total glutathione and total ascorbate levels have also been observed as well as an increase in their reduction state (Melino et al., 2009a; Fortes et al., 2011). There is also an increase in the production of galactolipid peroxidation products, directed
by lipoxygenase activity (Pilati et al., 2014). The molecular and biochemical changes that occur with the oxidative burst at veraison are indicative of an oxidative stress or “oxidative signaling” event (Foyer and Noctor, 2005) analogous to that of the climacteric burst of tomato fruit (Jimenez et al., 2002).

A negative regulator of transcription, NOR (non-ripening) was recently discovered in tomato, which prevents the transcription of ripening-related genes. The NOR protein is susceptible to post-translational regulation via methionine sulfoxidation (i.e., oxidative damage), causing a loss of DNA-binding capacity and thus enabling the transcription of ripening-related genes (Jiang et al., 2020). Therefore, oxidative stress signals are involved in the initiation of ripening, and such a transcription factor could be explored in relation to grape berry oxidative stress and ripening. A surge in ROS levels in the chloroplasts was also observed during the chloroplast-to-chromoplast transition in the exocarp. The trigger for the oxidative burst in grape berries is currently unknown but it is tempting to speculate that the developmental degeneration of chloroplasts, or chloroplast-to-chromoplast transition (Jimenez et al., 2002; Decros et al., 2019), and diminishing capacity for photosynthesis (Palliotti and Cartechini, 2001) leads to decreased accumulation of Asc and TA at veraison, thus the ascorbate/glutathione antioxidant system becomes overwhelmed, resulting in excess ROS generated from respiration or from photons that can no longer be captured for photosynthesis. As such, it would be expected that decreased Asc (or TA) levels and increased ROS could advance ripening. However, in Micro-Tom tomato fruit lacking GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase (VTC2), low levels of Asc (30% relative to wild type fruit) attenuated the ripening-related peak in H₂O₂ and delayed ripening, which was recoverable with the addition of exogenous Asc but further delayed by H₂O₂ (Steelheart et al., 2020). Meanwhile ripening of Kyoho grape berries could be brought forward by spraying with H₂O₂ (Guo et al., 2019). This underscores the importance, and complicated interplay of Asc and H₂O₂ for fruit ripening. Non-enzymatic catabolism of Asc (via DHA) to either OA and threonate (then potentially on to TA, at least in tomato), or to 2,3-diketogulonic acid (and several downstream catabolites) can generate H₂O₂ in the apoplast (Green and Fry, 2005; Kärkönen et al., 2017). Therefore, diversion of Asc to TA via the 4,5 cleavage pathway and L-idonate, as seen in grapes, could avert this pro-oxidant characteristic of Asc. Transgenic lines of tomato overexpressing VTC2 resulted in very large increases in Asc (3 to 6-fold) but impaired fruit growth and seed production (Bulley et al., 2012). Therefore a potentially important role for TA may be prevention of Asc or DHA over-accumulation in the apoplast, thus postponing the initiation of ripening until the seed is ready for dispersal. It should be noted, however, that translational repression of VTC2 via an upstream ORF (uORF) may prevent over-accumulation of Asc via a clever negative feedback loop as seen in Arabidopsis, tomato and lettuce leaves (Laing et al., 2015; Broad et al., 2020). If this mechanism is active in fruit cells, TA is less likely to be involved in the moderation of Asc accumulation except perhaps in circumstances where very rapid Asc accumulation requires an immediate overflow valve. A link between the

oxidative burst and the abrupt changes in TA biosynthesis and ascorbate/glutathione redox state is hereby tentatively proposed. A higher level of regulation is also likely to occur via crosstalk between hormones including ethylene and ABA (Chervin et al., 2004; Lijavetzky et al., 2012; Böttcher et al., 2013a; Carvalho et al., 2015; Pilati et al., 2017).

## Stress Tolerance

Several studies (many reviewed by Gill and Tuteja, 2010) have used over-expression of DHAR genes from various sources, to improve tolerance of tobacco, potato, and Arabidopsis plants to stresses such as salinity, drought, cold, ozone, heavy metal, herbicide treatment, or H₂O₂ application (Chen et al., 2003; Kwon et al., 2003; Chen and Gallie, 2005, 2008; Eltayeb et al., 2006, 2011; Ushimaru et al., 2006; Yin et al., 2010; Chang et al., 2017). Generally, the transgenic leaves demonstrated increased Asc due to recycling and in some cases increased levels of total ascorbate, leading to lower ROS accumulation and improved growth metrics in response to stressors. These studies demonstrate the importance of DHA recycling to Asc for tolerating oxidative stress. A study with tomato found that over-expression of DHAR increased total ascorbate levels in fruit but not leaves (Haroldsen et al., 2011). Redirection of DHA to TA biosynthesis removes the potential for Asc recycling and necessitates continuous biogenesis of Asc in pre-veraison berries. It is unclear whether this would have an impact on the antioxidant capacity of the Asc pool and stress tolerance. Studies of transgenic grapevines or natural mutants with impaired or increased TA accumulation are necessary to determine whether the promotion of TA biosynthesis could increase or decrease stress tolerance of grapevines. An exploration of publicly available datasets (below, **Table 1**) showed that TA biosynthesis genes are largely unaffected by environmental conditions.

Transcriptional profiling of all three *VvLidh* genes and the *Vv2kgr* gene with publicly available datasets was difficult due to a lack of microarray probesets and genome accessions for *VvLidh2*, and due to the similarity between *VvLidh1* and *VvLidh3* isoforms such that they may have been indistinguishable in RNAseq experiments. For the purpose of this analysis we assumed that *VvLidh* (VIT_16s0100g00290) represents transcripts of both *VvLidh1* and *VvLidh3*. Most datasets (**Table 1**) exhibited no changes in expression of *VvLidh* nor *Vv2kgr* (VIT_09s0002g04300), including experiments featuring water limitation (Berdeja et al., 2015; Catacchio et al., 2019), cold night temperature (Sawicki et al., 2019), elevated light (du Plessis et al., 2017), diurnal regulation (Rienth et al., 2014), salt stress in leaves (Upadhyay et al., 2018; Das and Majumder, 2019), increased source-sink ratio via cluster thinning (Pastore et al., 2011), copper stress (Leng et al., 2015) and abscisic acid application (Rattanakon et al., 2016; Pilati et al., 2017). In an experiment reporting the differential terroir effect on Cabernet Sauvignon berries in Bordeaux and Reno, there was also no change, but these experimental samples were skins collected during late ripening so expression of *VvLidh* was likely low anyway (Cramer et al., 2020). In response to elevated temperature exposure there was a small down-regulation of *VvLidh* at green and veraison berry stages (Rienth et al., 2016) and a small up-regulation at
<table><caption>**TABLE 1** | Summary of transcriptomic responses of *VvLidh* and *Vv2kgr* to environmental cues.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Treatment/Condition</th><th colspan="2">Log2 FC</th><th rowspan="2">Source</th></tr><tr><th>VvLidh</th><th>Vv2kgr</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Water deficit</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Berdeja et al., 2015</td></tr><tr><td>Water deficit</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Catacchio et al., 2019</td></tr><tr><td>Cold night temperature</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Sawicki et al., 2019</td></tr><tr><td>Elevated light</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>du Plessis et al., 2017</td></tr><tr><td>Salt (leaves)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Upadhyay et al., 2018</td></tr><tr><td>Salt (leaves)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Das and Majumder, 2019</td></tr><tr><td>Increased source:sink</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Pastore et al., 2011</td></tr><tr><td>Copper stress</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Leng et al., 2015</td></tr><tr><td>Terroir</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Cramer et al., 2020</td></tr><tr><td>Abscisic acid</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Pilati et al., 2017</td></tr><tr><td>Abscisic acid</td><td>0.08</td><td>-0.001</td><td>Rattanakon et al., 2016</td></tr><tr><td>Water deficit</td><td>-0.01 to 0</td><td>-0.02 to 0.02</td><td>Dal Santo et al., 2016</td></tr><tr><td>Water deficit</td><td>-0.2 to 0.9</td><td>-0.4 to 0.3</td><td>Ghan et al., 2015</td></tr><tr><td>Water deficit</td><td><b>0.4 to 1.4 (veraison or ripening berries)</b></td><td>—</td><td>Savoi et al., 2017</td></tr><tr><td>Extended drought</td><td><b>0.6 (veraison berries)</b></td><td><b>0.4 (veraison berries)</b></td><td>Savoi et al., 2016</td></tr><tr><td>Elevated temperature</td><td>-0.5 to 1.0 (green or veraison berries)</td><td>—</td><td>Lecourieux et al., 2017</td></tr><tr><td>Elevated temperature</td><td><b>1.3 (ripening berries)</b></td><td>—</td><td>Lecourieux et al., 2017</td></tr><tr><td>Elevated temperature</td><td><b>-1.4 to -2.1 (green or veraison berries)</b></td><td>—</td><td>Rienth et al., 2016</td></tr><tr><td>Elevated temperature</td><td><b>1.1 (ripening berries)</b></td><td>—</td><td>Rienth et al., 2016</td></tr><tr><td>Day (c.f. Night)</td><td><b>-1.2 (late ripening)</b></td><td>—</td><td>Rienth et al., 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Cold, anaerobic storage</td><td><b>2.8</b></td><td>—</td><td>Maoz et al., 2019</td></tr></tbody></table>

Dashes indicate datasets where log2-fold data could not be retrieved, as only DEGs were presented. In these cases it is suspected, but not confirmed, that the transcript was unchanged between treatment groups, however it could also reflect limits of detection or data lost during filtering steps. Bold indicates statistically significant differences.

ripening stages (Rienth et al., 2016; Lecourieux et al., 2017). There was also a slight up-regulation of both *VvLidh* and *Vv2kgr* transcripts in response to extended drought stress at veraison and during ripening (Savoi et al., 2016), while another water deficit experiment showed up-regulation of *VvLidh* only but was accompanied by a slight increase in TA levels (Savoi et al., 2017). Cold storage of table grapes post-harvest led to an increase in *VvLidh3*, if stored under anaerobic conditions (Maoz et al., 2019). Overall the *VvLidh3* and *Vv2kgr* transcripts are largely unaffected by environmental conditions.

## Flowering Time and Senescence

As reviewed by Foyer et al. (2020), Asc can regulate flowering time via the NO-mediated flowering repression pathway (Kumar et al., 2016), such that application of Asc or L-galactonolactone delays flowering, while knockout mutants of various *Vtc* genes in *A. thaliana* (i.e., less Asc) flower earlier (Kotchoni et al., 2009). Genetic modification of AO led to altered expression and diurnal regulation of catalase genes and photorespiration-related genes in tobacco, as well as altered DHAR and APX activities, MAPK activity and growth response to auxins (Pignocchi et al., 2006). A cytosolic APX knockout in Arabidopsis increased H₂O₂ content, delayed flowering, decreased photosynthesis rates, prevented stomatal closure in the dark, and decreased expression of some photorespiration-related genes (Pnueli et al., 2003). Overall, Asc metabolism can regulate many developmental switches including flowering and senescence via altered ROS (or

reactive nitrogen species (Podgórska et al., 2017; Smirnoff, 2018; Foyer et al., 2020), while TA biosynthesis could indirectly regulate these by catabolizing Asc in the grape.

## OTHER POTENTIAL ROLES OF TA BIOSYNTHESIS

The high levels of TA in Vitaceae may be considered an evolutionary consequence to aid in the dispersion of the mature seed of the grape berry by birds or animals, ensuring the berry is unpalatable until the seed is mature (Hardie and Obrien, 1988; Hardie, 2000; Brummell et al., 2016). Asc has also long been linked to plant defense against biotic and abiotic stressors (Smirnoff, 2000; Zechmann, 2011). Therefore, the possibility of TA being synthesized and stored in the cell as an alternative defensive mechanism, should also be considered at the whole organism level. The potential role in defense against herbivores was suggested by Böll et al. (2005), who found evidence of calcium tartrate crystals in the midgut of the phloem-sucking grape leafhoppers (*Empoasca vitis*) after feeding on grapevine leaves, with levels increasing during ripening of berries of the vine. Although TA was ineffective at preventing leafhoppers from eating the grapevine leaves, calcium tartrate crystals may have a more toxic effect on other insects that feed on grapevine. Both TA and OA have been identified in the hairs of stinging nettle (*Urtica dioica*) as eliciting a pain response in rats (Fu et al., 2006). The
human body, along with rabbits, dogs and rats cannot process TA, which instead must be expelled, or destroyed by microorganisms in the intestinal tract (Underhill et al., 1931; Finkle, 1933; Lord et al., 2005). Nevertheless, TA has been deemed non-toxic and appropriate for use as a food additive (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings et al., 2020) although the nutritional benefits have not been fully investigated (Spiller et al., 2003).

TA may be used as a carbon source by some microorganisms. Grape berries infected with *Botrytis cinerea* contained less TA and more sorbitol than uninfected berries (Ribereau-Gayon et al., 2006; Blanco-Ulate et al., 2015), hinting at a negative relationship between these two osmolytes that warrants further investigation considering the *VvLIDH3* is a Class II SDH. Based on transcriptomic data (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2015), infection of Semillon berries with *B. cinerea* led to consistent and significant up-regulation of *VvLidh3* expression in harvest-ripe berries (r = 0.78 between transcript level and measures of rot). However at harvest-ripeness, net TA biosynthesis is expected to be low or negligible. Transcript levels of a Botrytis-encoded tartrate dehydrogenase were also enhanced (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2015), therefore catabolism of TA by the fungus could explain the loss of TA. There were also some changes in Asc biosynthesis genes of the grape (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2015), suggesting that this whole metabolic pathway may be reprogrammed, possibly to elicit an antioxidant response. Meanwhile, transcript levels of *Vv2kgr* were largely unaffected but there were negative correlations (r = -0.77 and -0.79) between measures of rot and the transcript levels of two genes putatively associated with later steps in the TA synthesis pathway, a transketolase and a succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase. This could offer another explanation for lower TA levels in infected fruit, however these genes are yet to be confirmed as components of the TA biosynthesis pathway. Some yeast strains can also utilize L(+)-tartaric acid as a sole carbon source, including a significant number of Basidiomycetous species (Fonseca, 1992). Basidiomycetes, responsible for white rot (Fischer and García, 2015) have been shown to preferentially degrade the L-isomer over the other isomers (Fonseca, 1992). *Pseudomonas syringae* pv. *Syringae*, responsible for bacterial inflorescence rot (Whitelaw-Weckert et al., 2011), has also been shown to utilize TA (Hall, 2015).

## IDENTIFYING NEW CANDIDATES FOR THE REMAINING STEPS OF TA BIOSYNTHESIS

Currently, candidate genes in TA biosynthesis have been mainly identified through a biochemistry-guided approach, i.e., based on their annotated enzymatic functions in catalyzing one of the proposed biochemical reactions in the TA biosynthetic pathway. Other than *Vv2kgr* and *VvLidh3*, no candidates have been identified for the remaining steps of TA biosynthesis. These include the first dedicated step, i.e., the conversion of either Asc or DHA to 2-keto-L-gulonate (which may occur in multiple steps), and the final two steps, i.e., 5-keto-D-gluconate to tartaric acid semialdehyde, and subsequently to TA (Figure 1). It was earlier proposed that a transketolase

could cleave 5-keto-D-gluconate into 4C and 2C fragments; its normal role would likely be in the Calvin Cycle or the pentose phosphate pathway but perhaps under certain conditions 5-keto D-gluconate could be a substrate (Salusjärvi et al., 2004). For the final step, we suspect a "tartaric acid semialdehyde dehydrogenase", which could be a promiscuous succinic acid semialdehyde dehydrogenase or a divergent isoform with tartaric acid semialdehyde as a new preferred substrate. It may also be possible that some of these reactions occur non-enzymatically, or that one enzyme may be responsible for multiple steps, e.g., the *Vv2KGR* could conceivably convert Asc directly to L-idonate, as some activity was observed when the recombinant protein was provided Asc as a substrate (Burbidge, 2011).

To overcome the limitations faced by the biochemistry approach, alternative solutions such as QTL analyses based on bi-parental genetic mapping and GWAS have also been used to identify genetic loci linked to TA production. However, due to the complexity of TA biosynthesis and also the challenges in accurately measuring TA content, many genetic mapping studies using bi-parental crossing populations have failed to identify significant QTLs associated with TA production (Liang et al., 2011; Viana et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2015; Bayo-Canha et al., 2019). Houel et al. (2015), however reported consistent QTLs for TA on linkage groups LG4 and LG7 under multiple environmental conditions. The successful identification of genetic loci in this study may be attributed to the specific parent varieties used, likely to be a critical consideration in designing future QTL studies. In addition to bi-parental mapping studies, GWAS analyses using large germplasm collections have emerged as a promising approach in the search for candidate genes for TA biosynthesis. For example, a recent whole-genome resequencing of 472 *Vitis* accessions allowed comprehensive GWAS analyses on many grapevine traits including TA accumulation (Liang et al., 2019), which identified a putative deacetoxyvindoline 4-hydroxylase (VIT_05s0049g00420) and a cinnamoyl-CoA reductase 1-like protein (VIT_13s0064g00270) as potential candidates related to TA biosynthesis. Noteworthy, deacetoxyvindoline 4-hydroxylase belongs to the oxidoreductase superfamily and catalyzes the oxidation of 2-oxoglutarate (5-carbon) to succinate (4-carbon), thereby potentiating this enzyme in the last two steps of TA biosynthetic pathway, i.e., the conversion of 5-keto gluconate to TA. Experimental evidence is required before we can further speculate on their potential functions in TA biosynthesis. In addition, another comprehensive GWAS analysis of 279 *V. vinifera* L. cultivars also identified loci associated with TA accumulation (Flutre et al., 2020), although at this stage there is insufficient publicly available data to link this to a specific gene or set of genes.

A new approach to identifying candidates for the remaining steps takes advantage of publicly available 'omics' data banks and analysis tools. Gene co-expression networks (GCNs) are an emerging resource to study grapevine metabolism (Malacarne et al., 2016; Vannozzi et al., 2018), fruit development/ripening (Massonnet et al., 2017) and stress responses (Savoi et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2018, 2019). Central to GCN analysis is the 'guilt-by-association' principle whereby genes that share common functions or related processes are often co-ordinately
regulated across a wide range of conditions (e.g., multiple tissues, developmental stages, stress, hormones, etc.). Resources providing customized gene co-expression interrogation are available for grapevine (e.g., Moretto et al., 2016; Wong, 2020). To give an example of how such resources could be used to assist functional gene characterization within grape biosynthetic pathways, we used VTC-Agg (https://sites.google.com/view/vtc-agg) to search for genes that are highly co-expressed with *VvLidh3* and *Vv2kgr*. The data from this database consist of 33 separate experiments including over 1300 different samples across a range of tissues and developmental stages (Wong, 2020). This includes the grapevine transcriptome atlas dataset of Fasoli et al. (2012), which surveyed 54 different sample types, representing vegetative and reproductive organs at numerous developmental stages, including postharvest. The

GCN data sets could be mined in multiple ways, including scanning for genes encoding specific proteins of interest such as transketolases and succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenases, or exploring the most highly co-expressed genes (i.e., the top 1% of genes) for other pathways that may occur in parallel with TA biosynthesis, or identify transcription factors or other regulators of the pathway. Surprisingly, *VvLidh3* and *Vv2kgr* were not highly co-expressed with one another based on expression patterns in >1,300 samples (**Figure 3**), despite showing strong developmental similarities (Jia et al., 2019). This suggests that other conditions, e.g., stress or hormones, affect the expression of these two genes differently. Interestingly, and encouragingly, the transcript that was most highly co-expressed with *VvLidh3*, belonged to a putative GDP-D-mannose pyrophosphorylase gene (*VvVtc1*), while the most highly co-expressed transcript

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

**FIGURE 3** | Gene co-expression subnetwork of selected Asc and TA biosynthesis genes. Genes are depicted as nodes and edges depict Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) between nodes. Node borders in purple indicate query gene. Node shapes indicate their annotated functional categories. Node color indicate association with known berry acidity QTLs [e.g., †, Houel et al. (2015); *, Duchêne et al. (2020)]. Edge width indicates increasing PCC. Gene abbreviations are SCoA-Ligase succinyl CoA ligase, NADP-ME NADP-dependent malic enzyme, MDAR monodehydroascorbate reductase, MIPS *myo*-inositol-3-phosphate synthase, L-IDH L-idonate dehydrogenase, SSADH succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase, TDT tonoplast dicarboxylate transporter, GME GDP-D-mannose epimerase, FALDH glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase, VTC1 GDP-D-mannose pyrophosphorylase, VTC2_5 GDP-galactose phosphorylase, NAD-ME NAD-dependent malic enzyme, GLDH L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase, GDH L-galactose dehydrogenase, cytAPX cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase, cpAPX chloroplastic ascorbate peroxidase, DHAR dehydroascorbate reductase, UGT74E2 UDP-glucosyltransferase, KONJAC a sugar pyrophosphorylase that can stimulate VTC1 activity, GLX glyoxylase, GPX glutathione peroxidase, CB5LP a cytochrome B5, PMM phosphomannomutase, 2KGR 2-ketogulonic acid reductase, mMDH mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase, CYB Cytochrome B561, CSN5B interacts and modulates activity of VTC1, VTC4 L-galactose-1-phosphate phosphatase, IsoDH isocitrate dehydrogenase. Relevant QTLs from Houel et al. (2015) include: ToAG, total acids at green lag phase; TaG: tartrate at green lag phase; MOG: malate/total acids ratio at green lag phase; MTG, malate/tartrate ratio at green lag phase; and TOG, tartrate/total acids ratio at green lag phase. Relevant QTLs from Duchêne et al. (2020) include: MT, malate/total acids ratio in green berries (Riesling); pH_S2, pH in mid-ripening berries (Gewurztraminer); TA, tartaric acid concentration; KTA, potassium/tartaric acid ratio in berries (Gewurztraminer). For the full lists of co-expressed genes, refer to Wong (2020) supplementary data at https://sites.google.com/view/vtc-agg.
with *Vv2kgr*, was a L-galactose-1-phosphate phosphatase gene (*VvVtc4*). Both of these gene products are involved in plant Asc biosynthesis (Figure 1), indicating close regulation of Asc and TA biosynthesis pathways. A succinic acid semialdehyde dehydrogenase was linked to *VvLidh3* and is therefore a good candidate for the final step of the TA biosynthetic pathway. This strategy was also extended by integrating data from QTL studies aimed at berry acidity (e.g., Houel et al., 2015; Duchêne et al., 2020), to assist with candidate prioritization (Figure 3). Some interesting candidates that were both highly co-expressed with *VvLidh3*, and associated with berry acidity QTLs included two putative tonoplast dicarboxylate transporters (VIT_00s2188g00010 and VIT_00s0187g00130), which associated with a QTL for berry MA:TA concentration ([MA]:[TA]) on chromosome 10 (Houel et al., 2015) and two glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenases, or GSNORs (VIT_07s0005g04600, VIT_07s0005g04610) associated with a major QTL for titratable acidity on chromosome 4 (Duchêne et al., 2020). For *Vv2kgr*, candidates included a L-galactose-1-phosphate phosphatase gene, *VvVtc4* (VIT_10s0405g00030) and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (VIT_10s0003g01000), which have been implicated with QTLs for [MA]:[TA] and combined pH, TA concentration and potassium:TA concentration ([K+]:[TA]), respectively on chromosome 10 (Duchêne et al., 2020) as well as a predicted glyoxalase (VIT_05s0102g01180), which aligns with a QTL for total acids at green lag phase (Houel et al., 2015). Therefore this analysis has identified several promising candidates for the regulation of TA accumulation in grapevine.

Co-expression analyses were also conducted with known Asc pathway genes (from enzymatic steps summarized in Figure 1), such as phosphomannomutase (*VvPmm*, VIT_15s0046g03520), GDP-D-mannose pyrophosphorylase (*VvVtc1*, VIT_13s0019g02330), GDP-D-mannose epimerase 1 and 2 (*VvGme1-1*, VIT_05s0020g04510; *VvGme1-2*, VIT_14s0030g02180), GDP-galactose phosphorylase (*VvVtc2_5*, VIT_19s0090g01000) and L-galactose-1-phosphate phosphatase (*VvVtc4*, VIT_10s0405g00030). L-Galactose dehydrogenase (*VvGdh*, VIT_03s0088g01250), L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase (*VvGldh*, VIT_08s0007g05710), and myo-inositol-3-phosphate synthase (*VvMips1*, VIT_07s0031g00920) demonstrated strong and extensive co-expression among various Asc biosynthetic pathway genes, as well as some co-expression with Asc degradation and recycling pathways. For example, co-expression of (i) *VvGdh* with chloroplastic and cytosolic APX (*VvCkapx* and *VvCytapx*), (ii) *VvGme1-2* with DHA reductase 2 (*VvDhar2*), and (iii) *Vv2kgr* and *VvVtc4* with Cytochrome B561. The latter is very interesting, as it links a TA biosynthesis candidate with an Asc biosynthesis candidate and an Asc-dependent oxidoreductase of the plasma membrane involved in electron transport, supporting the idea of TA biosynthesis in the apoplast. Together with the coordinated expression of *VvLidh3* with *VvVtc1*, and *Vv2kgr* with *VvVtc4*, as well as similar metabolite accumulation profiles, there is likely to be coordinated regulation of Asc and TA biosynthetic pathways, potentiating an efficient flux to the endpoint metabolite, as seen for other metabolic pathways in plants (Winkel, 2004; Obata, 2019).

The tight co-regulation of Asc and TA metabolism pathways may involve regulatory control by hormones. A sizable proportion (ca. 10%) of co-expressed genes (of both Asc and TA genes) in the berry were differentially expressed in response to auxin (Dal Santo et al., 2020). A smaller proportion (ca. 5%) of co-expressed genes were modulated by abscisic acid (Pilati et al., 2017). Interestingly, *VvLidh3* was also significantly upregulated in berries by naphthalene acetic acid three hours post-treatment compared to the non-treated control (Dal Santo et al., 2020). These findings indicate a key role of auxin in the regulation of TA metabolism and co-expressed pathways both directly or indirectly. However, we cannot discount the involvement of other hormones given the lack of genome-wide transcriptome studies pertaining to hormonal regulation (e.g., ethylene, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid). Together, this demonstrates how Asc pathway genes can be effectively leveraged to identify more TA candidate genes (e.g., biosynthetic, regulatory, transporters) compared to the restricted lists when using just *VvLidh3* and *Vv2kgr* as guides. We predict that Asc pathway co-expressed genes that also associate with TA concentration or other acidity-related QTLs will likely be relevant in this endeavor.

## FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR TARTARIC ACID RESEARCH

Despite being first proposed over 50 years ago (Saito and Kasai, 1969), our understanding of the biochemical and genetic pathways to TA in grapes remains significantly under-developed. Two enzyme candidates have been characterized but definitive (i.e., genetic) evidence of their roles remains elusive. Thus far there are no known genetic nor biochemical regulators of the pathway. While 'conventional' molecular and biochemical approaches may in time yield additional candidates, research on TA biochemistry in grapes should be conducted with a mind to alternative possibilities. For example, some parts of TA biosynthesis may occur without the assistance of an enzyme, or a single enzyme may be responsible for multiple proposed steps. Meanwhile, the search for novel proteins contributing to a specialized pathway of TA biosynthesis could be directed instead to enzymes of common metabolic pathways with potential subfunctions, or "moon-lighting" functions. For example, genes that are transcribed in a pattern that is inconsistent with their sequence-predicted functions and more consistent with the transcriptional patterns of *VvLidh3* and *Vv2kgr*, and the timing and localization of TA biosynthesis. As TA accumulates to large quantities very quickly [up to 30% of assimilated CO₂ in very young berries (Saito and Kasai, 1968; 1969)], candidate proteins are likely to be highly abundant, especially during early development.

An intriguing aspect of TA is the existence of multiple biosynthetic pathways, which have arisen separately in different organisms, despite the limited distribution of this metabolite in plants. In the leaves of Geraniaceae plants Asc is cleaved between C2 and C3, with the C3-C6 fragment giving rise to L-threonate and subsequently converted to TA, and C1-C2 becoming OA (Williams and Loewus, 1978). In grape
berries L-threonate and OA also occur via 2,3 cleavage of Asc. However, TA arises from a separate pathway whereby Asc is first converted to 5-keto-D-gulonate before being cleaved between C4 and C5, with C1-C4 going on to become TA (reviewed by Ford, 2012). It is unknown why grapevines enlist an entirely new set of enzymes when the 2,3-cleavage activity for Asc is already active. Perhaps the enzyme(s) responsible for converting L-threonate to TA in Geraniaceae are absent or inactive in Vitaceae. OA accumulation typically, but not always, follows the same developmental pattern of accumulation as TA (Melino et al., 2009a; Simson and Debolt, 2012) and the two coexist in the same cell types, thus the pathways likely compete for Asc or DHA (DeBolt et al., 2004). The different biochemical routes to TA observed between species may also reflect contrasting roles of the acid. Updated radiolabelling experiments utilizing ¹³C-Asc and tandem mass spectrometry could be used to determine the proportion of TA biosynthesis that occurs via the 2,3 and 4,5 cleavage pathways in grapes. Measurement of TA precursors as part of wider ranging metabolomic studies may also assist in confirming the existence of a particular route(s) of TA biosynthesis without the need for radiolabeled precursors, and could identify environmental conditions that are favorable for the biosynthesis of TA precursors. Comprehensive studies taking into account environmental and vintage effects are also essential to understanding and anticipating future physiological consequences for grapevines (Cholet et al., 2016). Above all, transgenic grapevine studies with altered expression of *Vv2Kgr*, *VvLidh3* and any other candidates will be necessary for confirmation of the TA biosynthetic pathway genes. Further investigation into the potential of DHA as the precursor to TA should also be explored via transgenic work in TA-accumulating species and tissues.

The classification of *VvLIDH1* and *VvLIDH3* as “Class II” plant SDHs and *VvLIDH2* as a “Class I” SDH provides an opportunity to more deeply understand these enzymes in grapevine and in other plants. Class I SDHs should be clearly differentiated from Class II SDHs when analyzing their potential function in TA biosynthesis because the latter may be the only “genuine” L-IDH. Special attention should also be given to the clear transcriptional divergence between Class I and Class II SDHs, which may shed light on their different biological functions. While the transcript profiles of *VvLidh1* and *VvLidh3* strictly match the developmental pattern of TA accumulation in the berries, a characteristic that was key to the original functional characterization of *VvLidh3* (DeBolt et al., 2006), the Class I SDH (*VvLidh2*; VIT_16s0100g00300) transcripts actually increase from veraison (Sweetman et al., 2012; Conde et al., 2015). Therefore, the Class II SDH genes have not only diverged with respect to their substrate preference, but also expression pattern. The regulators of confirmed L-IDHs may activate transcription in response to photosynthetic, redox or ROS signals and should be investigated for such responsive elements.

Insights could also be gained from other species such as rose-scented geranium, where secondary structures have been predicted for Asc and TA biosynthesis enzymes, including substrate binding sites of L-IDH (Narnoliya et al., 2018). Some important residues included Cys47, His72, Glu73, Glu158,

consistent with those identified in *VvLIDH3* for substrate binding Cys36, His61, Glu62, Glu147 (Jia et al., 2015). Predictions of isoelectric point and other functional properties were also carried out in geranium (Narnoliya et al., 2018), followed by the identification of non-coding RNAs that may regulate expression of the gene (Narnoliya et al., 2019). Such information could assist functional analysis, mutagenesis and regulation studies of *V. vinifera* L-IDH. In addition to grapevine and geranium, although at a less significant level, TA production has also been reported in potato (Galdón et al., 2010), citrus fruits (Nour et al., 2010), and pear (Hudina and Stampar, 2000; Sha et al., 2011). These three species have been shown to contain a single copy L-IDH or “Class II” SDH (Jia et al., 2015). Of particular interest was potato, which as an annual herb plant may have an advantage over other species to be exploited as a model for the identification of other TA pathway genes. On another interesting note, TA has also been identified as the main acid in avocado (Pedreschi et al., 2019) and tamarind (Van den Bilcke et al., 2014) fruits. In contrast to most fruits including grape, avocado contains very low levels of citric and malic acids (Pedreschi et al., 2019). These species would be useful models to investigate the genetic and metabolic basis of distinct organic acid profiles and to elucidate the metabolic function, if any, of TA in these plants.

The elaborate regulation of Asc metabolism via biosynthesis, recycling and transport pathways, and its fundamental importance to the ascorbate/glutathione antioxidant pathway (Foyer et al., 2020) clashes with the idea that the irreversible catabolism of Asc (or DHA) to TA should occur by chance or as an “incidental” overflow valve. We propose that the catabolism of Asc or DHA to TA is a regulated process. The hypotheses that TA biosynthesis contributes to antioxidant metabolism, ROS avoidance or as a sink for excess ascorbate in pre-veraison berries, and the potential link to oxidative burst at veraison require further investigation. Gene editing experiments with grapevines, or other TA-accumulating models mentioned above, would be highly suited to this purpose, targeting *Vv2kgr* and *VvLidh3* in the first instance but also new candidates that arise from *in silico* and QTL analyses. Measurement of H₂O₂ evolution and TA localization in berries of cultivars that harbor different oxygen distribution patterns, such as those reported by Xiao et al. (2018), could be explored, as could the use of plant growth regulators that alter the timing of ripening (Böttcher et al., 2011, 2012, 2013b), or mutants with altered ripening times (Wei et al., 2020), to test the relationship between the oxidative burst and TA/Asc metabolism at veraison. A fleshless grape berry mutant, where TA accumulates to normal levels but the lack of mesophyll results in lower MA content (Fernandez et al., 2006), could also be a useful tool for investigating the dynamics of Asc metabolism and TA biosynthesis in grapes, and to determine whether metabolism in the flesh is required to support the oxidative burst observed in the skins. Eventually, once the entire TA biosynthetic pathway and the genes responsible have been established, integration of these genes into a non-TA-accumulating plant would be a valuable approach to investigate the hypothesized roles of TA in plant metabolism.

As a final thought, the pathway to TA synthesis in grape berries may only persist due to centuries of grapevine cultivation via
clonal propagation (therefore a lack of meiotic recombination) and selection for traits beneficial to winemaking processes and wine style rather than those essential for the competitive survival of the species. In this way, human activity has cemented the relevant biochemical activities and molecular regulators into the genetic lineage of *V. vinifera*. It is another example of artificial selection of a trait considered favorable by humans but otherwise biologically useless to the host, such as early flowering time, larger seed size and determinate habit in grain crops (Izawa, 2007; Shomura et al., 2008; Tian et al., 2010), increased milk production in dairy cattle (Flori et al., 2009) or appearance and temperament characteristics in dog breeds (Akey et al., 2010). In these examples, analysis of SNPs between breeds, cultivars, progeny and progenitors has shed light on genetic components of these domesticated traits. Such an approach may also be possible for TA accumulation in grapevines, considering the absence of TA in at least one species (DeBolt et al., 2006). In any case, this

unusual metabolic endpoint with its favorable acid property likely influenced the initial adoption of grapes for winemaking, as early as 5000 BC (McGovern et al., 1996) and remains a significant player in grape and wine biochemistry today. Now the technology is available to begin manipulating TA levels in grapes and wine, with an aim to improve the quality of products for both industry effectiveness and consumer preference.

## AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

CS and CAB formulated the fundamental structure and content of the manuscript. CF, VM, DW, YJ, CJ, and KS contributed significant ideas, text, and corrections. SC, PD, MR, CB, RW, and FF provided further useful discussions, comments, and corrections. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

## REFERENCES

Adams, D. O., and Liyanage, C. (1993). Glutathione increases in grape berries at the onset of ripening. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic.* 44, 333-338.

Aguayo, M. F., Ampuero, D., Mandujano, P., Parada, R., Muñoz, R., Gallart, M., et al. (2013). Sorbitol dehydrogenase is a cytosolic protein required for sorbitol metabolism in *Arabidopsis thaliana*. *Plant Sci.* 20, 63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci. 2013.01.012

Agudelo-Romero, P., Bortolloti, C., Pais, M. S., Tiburcio, A. F., and Fortes, A. M. (2013). Study of polyamines during grape ripening indicate an important role of polyamine catabolism. *Plant Physiol. Biochem.* 67, 105-119. doi: 10.1016/j. plaphy.2013.02.024

Akey, J. M., Ruhe, A. L., Akey, D. T., Wong, A. K., Connelly, C. F., Madeoy, J., et al. (2010). Tracking footprints of artificial selection in the dog genome. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 107, 1160-1165. doi: 10.1073/pnas.090991 8107

Alscher, R. G., Erturk, N., and Heath, L. S. (2002). Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. *J. Exp. Bot.* 53, 1331-1341. doi: 10.1093/jxb/53.372.1331

Amerine, M. A., Roessler, E. B., and Ough, C. S. (1965). Acids and the acid taste. I. The effect of pH and titratable acidity. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic.* 16, 29-37.

Asada, K. (1992). Ascorbate peroxidase – a hydrogen peroxide-scavenging enzyme in plants. *Physiol. Plant.* 85, 235-241. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb0 4728.x

Ban, Y. (2016). Genetic dissection of quantitative trait loci for berry traits in interspecific hybrid grape (*Vitis labruscana* × *Vitis vinifera*). *Euphytica* 211, 295-310. doi: 10.1007/s10681-016-1737-8

Bayo-Canha, A., Costantini, L., Fernández-Fernández, J. I., Martínez-Cutillas, A., and Ruiz-García, L. (2019). QTLs related to berry acidity identified in a wine grapevine population grown in warm weather. *Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.* 37, 157-169. doi: 10.1007/s11105-019-01145-6

Berdeja, M., Nicolas, P., Kappel, C., Dai, Z. W., Hilbert, G., Peccoux, A., et al. (2015). Water limitation and rootstock genotype interact to alter grape berry metabolism through transcriptome reprogramming. *Hortic. Res.* 2:15012. doi: 10.1038/hortres.2015.12

Bienert, G. P., Schjoerring, J. K., and Jahn, T. P. (2006). Membrane transport of hydrogen peroxide. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* 1758, 994-1003. doi: 10.1016/j. bbamem.2006.02.015

Bigard, A., Berhe, D. T., Maoddi, E., Sire, Y., Boursiquot, J.-M., Ojeda, H., et al. (2018). *Vitis vinifera* L. fruit diversity to breed varieties anticipating climate changes. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 9:455. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00455

Blanco-Ulate, B., Amrine, K. C. H., Collins, T. S., Rivero, R. M., Vicente, A. R., Morales-Cruz, A., et al. (2015). Developmental and metabolic plasticity of white-skinned grape berries in response to *Botrytis cinerea* during noble rot. *Plant Physiol.* 169, 2422-2443. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00852

Böll, S., Schmitt, T., Burschka, C., Schreier, P., Schwappach, P., and Herrmann, J. V. (2005). Calcium tartrate crystals in the midgut of the grape leafhopper. *J. Chem. Ecol.* 31, 2847-2856. doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-8398-8

Böttcher, C., Boss, P. K., and Davies, C. (2012). Delaying Riesling grape berry ripening with a synthetic auxin affects malic acid metabolism and sugar accumulation, and alters wine sensory characters. *Funct. Plant Biol.* 39, 745-753. doi: 10.1071/FP12132

Böttcher, C., Burbidge, C. A., Boss, P. K., and Davies, C. (2013a). Interactions between ethylene and auxin are crucial to the control of grape (*Vitis vinifera* L.) berry ripening. *BMC Plant Biol.* 13:222. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-222

Böttcher, C., Harvey, K., Forde, C. G., Boss, P. K., and Davies, C. (2011). Auxin treatment of pre-veraison grape (*Vitis vinifera* L.) berries both delays ripening and increases the synchronicity of sugar accumulation. *Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.* 17, 1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2010.00110.x

Böttcher, C., Harvey, K. E., Boss, P. K., and Davies, C. (2013b). Ripening of grape berries can be advanced or delayed by reagents that either reduce or increase ethylene levels. *Funct. Plant Biol.* 40, 566-581. doi: 10.1071/FP12347

Boulton, R. (1980). The relationships between total acidity, titratable acidity and pH in grape tissue. *Vitis* 19, 113-120.

Broad, R. C., Bonneau, J. P., Hellens, R. P., and Johnson, A. A. T. (2020). Manipulation of ascorbate biosynthetic, recycling, and regulatory pathways for improved abiotic stress tolerance in plants. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.* 21:1790. doi: 10.3390/ijms21051790

Brummell, D., Atkinson, R., Burdon, J. N., Patterson, K. J., and Schaffer, R. (2016). "Fruit growth, ripening and post-harvest physiology," in *Plants in Action*, eds B. J. Atwell, P. E. Kriedemann, and C. G. N. Turnbull (New York, NY: Macmillan Publishers), 350-380.

Bulley, S., Wright, M., Rommens, C., Yan, H., Rassam, M., Lin-Wang, K., et al. (2012). Enhancing ascorbate in fruits and tubers through over-expression of the *L*-galactose pathway gene *GDP-L*-galactose phosphorylase. *Plant Biotechnol. J.* 10, 390-397. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00668.x

Burbidge, C. A. (2011). *Identification and Characterisation of the Enzymes Involved in the Biosynthetic Pathway of Tartaric Acid in Vitis vinifera*. Ph.D. thesis, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide.

Buttrose, M. S., Hale, C. R., and Kliewer, W. M. (1971). Effect of temperature on the composition of 'Cabernet Sauvignon' berries. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic.* 22, 71-75.

Canton, M., Drincovich, M. F., Lara, M. V., Vizzotto, G., Walker, R. P., Famiani, F., et al. (2020). Metabolism of stone fruits: reciprocal contribution between primary metabolism and cell wall. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 11:1054. doi: 10.3389/fpls. 2020.01054

Carvalho, L. C., Vidigal, P., and Amâncio, S. (2015). Oxidative stress homeostasis in grapevine (*Vitis vinifera* L.). *Front. Environ. Sci.* 3:20. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2015. 00020

Catacchio, C. R., Alagna, F., Perniola, R., Bergamini, C., Rotunno, S., Calabrese, F. M., et al. (2019). Transcriptomic and genomic structural variation analyses
on grape cultivars reveal new insights into the genotype-dependent responses to water stress. *Sci. Rep.* 9:2809. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39010-x

Chang, L., Sun, H., Yang, H., Wang, X., Su, Z., Chen, F., et al. (2017). Over-expression of dehydroascorbate reductase enhances oxidative stress tolerance in tobacco. *Electron J. Biotechnol.* 25, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2016. 10.009

Chen, J., Wang, N., Fang, L.-C., Liang, Z.-C., Li, S.-H., and Wu, B.-H. (2015). Construction of a high-density genetic map and QTLs mapping for sugars and acids in grape berries. *BMC Plant Biol.* 15:28. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0428-2

Chen, Z., and Gallie, D. R. (2005). Increasing tolerance to ozone by elevating foliar ascorbic acid confers greater protection against ozone than increasing avoidance. *Plant Physiol.* 138, 1673–1689. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.062000

Chen, Z., and Gallie, D. R. (2008). Dehydroascorbate reductase affects non- photochemical quenching and photosynthetic performance. *J. Biol. Chem.* 283, 21347–21361. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m802601200

Chen, Z., Young, T. E., Ling, J., Chang, S.-C., and Gallie, D. R. (2003). Increasing vitamin C content of plants through enhanced ascorbate recycling. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 100, 3525–3530. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0635176100

Chervin, C., El-Kereamy, A., Roustan, J.-P., Latché, A., Lamon, J., and Bouzayen, M. (2004). Ethylene seems required for the berry development and ripening in grape, a non-climacteric fruit. *Plant Sci.* 167, 1301–1305. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci. 2004.06.026

Cholet, C., Claverol, S., Claisse, O., Rabot, A., Osowsky, A., Dumot, V., et al. (2016). Tartaric acid pathways in *Vitis vinifera* L. (cv. Ugni blanc): a comparative study of two vintages with contrasted climatic conditions. *BMC Plant Biol.* 16:144. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0833-1

Conde, A., Regalado, A., Rodrigues, D., Costa, J. M., Blumwald, E., Chaves, M. M., et al. (2015). Polyols in grape berry: transport and metabolic adjustments as a physiological strategy for water-deficit stress tolerance in grapevine. *J. Exp. Bot.* 66, 889–906. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru446

Conklin, P. L., Williams, E. H., and Last, R. L. (1996). Environmental stress sensitivity of an ascorbic acid-deficient *Arabidopsis* mutant. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 93, 9970–9974. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9970

Coombe, B. G. (1987). Influence of temperature on composition and quality of grapes. *Acta Hortic.* 206, 23–36. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1987.206.1

Cramer, G. R., Cochetel, N., Ghan, R., Destrac-Irvine, A., and Delrot, S. (2020). A sense of place: transcriptomics identifies environmental signatures in Cabernet Sauvignon berry skins in the late stages of ripening. *BMC Plant Biol.* 20:41. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2251-7

Dagley, S., and Trudgill, P. W. (1963). The metabolism of tartaric acid by a *Pseudomonas*. A new pathway. *Biochem. J.* 89, 22–31. doi: 10.1042/bj0890022

Dai, Z. W., Ollat, N., Gomès, E., Decroocq, S., Tandonnet, J.-P., Bordenave, L., et al. (2011). Ecophysiological, genetic, and molecular causes of variation in grape berry weight and composition: a review. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic.* 62, 413–425. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2011.10116

Dal Santo, S., Palliotti, A., Zenoni, S., Tornielli, G. B., Fasoli, M., Paci, P., et al. (2016). Distinct transcriptome responses to water limitation in isohydric and anisohydric grapevine cultivars. *BMC Genomics* 17:815. doi: 10.1186/s12864- 016-3136-x

Dal Santo, S., Tucker, M. R., Tan, H.-T., Burbidge, C. A., Fasoli, M., Böttcher, C., et al. (2020). Auxin treatment of grapevine (*Vitis vinifera* L.) berries delays ripening onset by inhibiting cell expansion. *Plant Mol. Biol.* 103, 91–111. doi: 10.1007/s11103-020-00977-1

Das, P., and Majumder, A. L. (2019). Transcriptome analysis of grapevine under salinity and identification of key genes responsible for salt tolerance. *Funct. Integr. Genomics* 19, 61–73. doi: 10.1007/s10142-018-0628-6

Davey, M. W., Montagu, M. V., Inzé, D., Sanmartin, M., Kanellis, A., Smirnoff, N., et al. (2000). Plant L-ascorbic acid: chemistry, function, metabolism, bioavailability and effects of processing. *J. Sci. Food Agric.* 80, 825–860. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(20000515)80:7<825::AID-JSFA598<3.0.CO;2-6

De Angeli, A., Baetz, U., Francisco, R., Zhang, J., Chaves, M. M., and Regalado, A. (2013). The vacuolar channel VvALMT9 mediates malate and tartrate accumulation in berries of *Vitis vinifera*. *Planta* 238, 283–291. doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1888-y

de Orduña, R. M. (2010). Climate change associated effects on grape and wine quality and production. *Food Res. Int.* 43, 1844–1855. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres. 2010.05.001

de Pinto, M. C., Francis, D., and De Gara, L. (1999). The redox state of the ascorbate-dehydroascorbate pair as a specific sensor of cell division in tobacco BY-2 cells. *Protoplasma* 209, 90–97. doi: 10.1007/BF01415704

de Pinto, M. C., Paradiso, A., Leonetti, P., and De Gara, L. (2006). Hydrogen peroxide, nitric oxide and cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase at the crossroad between defence and cell death. *Plant J.* 48, 784–795. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X. 2006.02919.x

De Tullio, M. C., Ciraci, S., Liso, R., and Arrigoni, O. (2007). Ascorbic acid oxidase is dynamically regulated by light and oxygen. A tool for oxygen management in plants? *J. Plant Physiol.* 164, 39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.09.016

DeBolt, S. (2006). *Tartaric acid biosynthesis in plants*. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide.

DeBolt, S., Cook, D. R., and Ford, C. M. (2006). L-tartaric acid synthesis from vitamin C in higher plants. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 103, 5608–5613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510864103

DeBolt, S., Hardie, J., Tyerman, S., and Ford, C. M. (2004). Composition and synthesis of raphide crystals and druse crystals in berries of *Vitis vinifera* L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon: ascorbic acid as precursor for both oxalic and tartaric acids as revealed by radiolabelling studies. *Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.* 10, 134–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2004.tb00016.x

DeBolt, S., Melino, V., and Ford, C. M. (2007). Ascorbate as a biosynthetic precursor in plants. *Ann. Bot.* 99, 3–8. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl236

Decros, G., Baldet, P., Beauvoit, B., Stevens, R., Flandin, A., Colombié, S., et al. (2019). Get the balance right: ROS homeostasis and redox signalling in fruit. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 10:1091. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01091

Deluc, L. G., Grimplet, J., Wheatley, M. D., Tillett, R. L., Quilici, D. R., Osborne, C., et al. (2007). Transcriptomic and metabolite analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon grape berry development. *BMC Genomics* 8:429. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-429

Diakou, P., Moing, A., Svanella, L., Ollat, N., Rolin, D. B., Gaudillere, M., et al. (1997). Biochemical comparison of two grape varieties differing in juice acidity. *Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.* 3, 1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.1997.tb00122.x

Dowdle, J., Ishikawa, T., Gatzek, S., Rolinski, S., and Smirnoff, N. (2007). Two genes in *Arabidopsis thaliana* encoding GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase are required for ascorbate biosynthesis and seedling viability. *Plant J.* 52, 673–689. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03266.x

du Plessis, K., Young, P. R., Eyéghé-Bickong, H. A., and Vivier, M. A. (2017). The transcriptional responses and metabolic consequences of acclimation to elevated light exposure in grapevine berries. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 8:1261. doi: 10. 3389/fpls.2017.01261

Duchêne, E., Dumas, V., Jaegli, N., and Merdinoglu, D. (2014). Genetic variability of descriptors for grapevine berry acidity in Riesling, Gewürztraminer and their progeny. *Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.* 20, 91–99. doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12051

Duchêne, É., Dumas, V., Butterlin, G., Jaegli, N., Rustenholz, C., Chauveau, A., et al. (2020). Genetic variations of acidity in grape berries are controlled by the interplay between organic acids and potassium. *Theor. Appl. Genet.* 133, 993–1008. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03524-9

Dumville, J. C., and Fry, S. C. (2003). Solubilisation of tomato fruit pectins by ascorbate: a possible non-enzymic mechanism of fruit softening. *Planta* 217, 951–961. doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-1061-0

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings, Younes, M., Aquilina, G., Castle, L., Engel, K.-H., Fowler, P., et al. (2020). Re-evaluation of *L(+)*-tartaric acid (E 334), sodium tartrates (E 335), potassium tartrates (E 336), potassium sodium tartrate (E 337) and calcium tartrate (E 354) as food additives. *EFSA J. Food Addit.* 18:e06030. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6030

Eltayeb, A. E., Kawano, N., Badawi, G. H., Kaminaka, H., Sanekata, T., Morishima, I., et al. (2006). Enhanced tolerance to ozone and drought stresses in transgenic tobacco overexpressing dehydroascorbate reductase in cytosol. *Physiol. Plant.* 127, 57–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00624.x

Eltayeb, A. E., Yamamoto, S., Habora, M. E. E., Yin, L., Tsujimoto, H., and Tanaka, K. (2011). Transgenic potato overexpressing Arabidopsis cytosolic *AtDHAR1* showed higher tolerance to herbicide, drought and salt stresses. *Breed. Sci.* 61, 3–10. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.61.3

Fasoli, M., Dal Santo, S., Zenoni, S., Tornielli, G. B., Farina, L., Zamboni, A., et al. (2012). The grapevine expression atlas reveals a deep transcriptome shift driving the entire plant into a maturation program. *Plant Cell* 24, 3489–3505. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.100230
Fernandez, L., Romieu, C., Moing, A., Bouquet, A., Maucourt, M., Thomas, M. R., et al. (2006). The grapevine *fleshless berry* mutation. A unique genotype to investigate differences between fleshy and nonfleshy fruit. *Plant Physiol.* 140, 537-547. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.067488

Fernie, A. R., and Bauwe, H. (2020). Wasteful, essential, evolutionary stepping stone? The multiple personalities of the photorespiratory pathway. *Plant J.* 102, 666-677. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14669

Finkle, P. (1933). The Fate of tartaric acid in the human body. *J. Biol. Chem.* 100, 349-355. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)76012-2

Fischer, M., and García, V. G. (2015). An annotated checklist of European basidiomycetes related to white rot of grapevine (*Vitis vinifera*). *Phytopathol. Mediterr.* 54, 281-298. doi: 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-16293

Flagel, L. E., and Wendel, J. F. (2009). Gene duplication and evolutionary novelty in plants. *New Phytol.* 183, 557-564. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02923.x

Flori, L., Fritz, S., Jaffrézic, F., Boussaha, M., Gut, I., Heath, S., et al. (2009). The genome response to artificial selection: a case study in dairy cattle. *PLoS One* 4:e6595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006595

Flutre, T., Le Cunff, L., Fodor, A., Launay, A., Romieu, C., Berger, G., et al. (2020). Genome-wide association and prediction studies using a grapevine diversity panel give insights into the genetic architecture of several traits of interest. *bioRxiv* doi: 10.1101/2020.09.10.290890

Fonseca, A. (1992). Utilization of tartaric acid and related compounds by yeasts: taxonomic implications. *Can. J. Microbiol.* 38, 1242-1251. doi: 10.1139/m92-205

Ford, C. M. (2012). "The biochemistry of organic acids in the grape," in *The Biochemistry of the Grape Berry*, eds H. Gerós, M. Chaves, and S. Delrot (Sharjah: Bentham Science Publishers), 67-88. doi: 10.2174/978160805360511201010067

Fortes, A. M., Agudelo-Romero, P., Silva, M. S., Ali, K., Sousa, L., Maltese, F., et al. (2011). Transcript and metabolite analysis in Trincadeira cultivar reveals novel information regarding the dynamics of grape ripening. *BMC Plant Biol.* 11:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-149

Foyer, C. H., Kyndt, T., and Hancock, R. D. (2020). Vitamin C in plants: Novel concepts, new perspectives, and outstanding issues. *Antioxid. Redox Signal.* 32, 463-485. doi: 10.1089/ars.2019.7819

Foyer, C. H., and Noctor, G. (2005). Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: A metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. *Plant Cell* 17, 1866-1875. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.033589

Fu, H. Y., Chen, S. J., Chen, R. F., Ding, W. H., Kuo-Huang, L. L., and Huang, R. N. (2006). Identification of oxalic acid and tartaric acid as major persistent pain-inducing toxins in the stinging hairs of the nettle, *Urtica thunbergiana*. *Ann. Bot.* 98, 57-65. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl089

Galdón, B., Mesa, D., Rodríguez, E., and Diaz, C. (2010). Influence of the cultivar on the organic acid and sugar composition of potatoes. *J. Sci. Food Agric.* 90, 2301-2309. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4086

Ghan, R., Van Sluyter, S. C., Hochberg, U., Degu, A., Hopper, D. W., Tillet, R. L., et al. (2015). Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (*Vitis vinifera* L.) cultivars. *BMC Genomics* 16:946. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2115-y

Gilbert, L., Alhagdow, M., Nunes-Nesi, A., Quemener, B., Guillon, F., Bouchet, B., et al. (2009). GDP-D-mannose 3,5-epimerase (GME) plays a key role at the intersection of ascorbate and non-cellulosic cell-wall biosynthesis in tomato. *Plant J.* 60, 499-508. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03972.x

Gill, S. S., and Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. *Plant Physiol. Biochem.* 48, 909-930. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016

Godden, P., Wilkes, E., and Johnson, D. (2015). Trends in the composition of Australian wine 1984-2014. *Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.* 21, 741-753. doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12195

Gomes, T. M., Mazon, L. F., Panceri, C. P., Machado, B. D., Brighenti, A., Burin, V. M., et al. (2020). Changes in vineyard productive attributes and phytochemical composition of sauvignon blanc grape and wine induced by the application of silicon and calcium. *J. Sci. Food Agric.* 100, 1547-1557. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10163

Gouot, J. C., Smith, J. P., Holzapfel, B. P., and Barril, C. (2019). Impact of short temperature exposure of *Vitis vinifera* L. cv. Shiraz grapevine bunches on berry development, primary metabolism and tannin accumulation. *Environ. Exp. Bot.* 168:103866. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103866

Green, M. A., and Fry, S. C. (2005). Vitamin C degradation in plant cells via enzymatic hydrolysis of 4-O-oxalyl-L-threonate. *Nature* 433, 83-87. doi: 10.1038/nature03172

Grimplet, J., Wheatley, M. D., Jouira, H. B., Deluc, L. G., Cramer, G. R., and Cushman, J. C. (2009). Proteomic and selected metabolite analysis of grape berry tissues under well-watered and water-deficit stress conditions. *Proteomics* 9, 2503-2528. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800158

Guo, D., Ji, X., Li, Q., Zhang, G., and Yu, Y. (2020). Genome-wide characterisation of superoxide dismutase genes in grape and their expression analyses during berry development process. *J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.* 95, 53-64. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2019.1647799

Guo, D. L., Wang, Z. G., Li, Q., Gu, S. C., Zhang, G. H., and Yu, Y. H. (2019). Hydrogen peroxide treatment promotes early ripening of Kyoho grape. *Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.* 25, 357-362. doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12399

Guo, D.-L., Xi, F.-F., Yu, Y.-H., Zhang, X.-Y., Zhang, G.-H., and Zhong, G.-Y. (2016). Comparative RNA-Seq profiling of berry development between table grape 'Kyoho' and its early-ripening mutant 'Fengzao'. *BMC Genomics* 17:795. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3051-1

Hall, S. (2015). *Effects of the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pathovar syringae on Vitis vinifera*. Ph.D. thesis, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst.

Hancock, R. D., and Viola, R. (2005). Biosynthesis and catabolism of L-ascorbic acid in plants. *Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.* 24, 167-188. doi: 10.1080/07352680591002165

Hardie, W., and Obrien, T. (1988). Considerations of the biological significance of some volatile constituents of grape (*Vitis* spp). *Aust. J. Bot.* 36, 107-117. doi: 10.1071/BT9880107

Hardie, W. J. (2000). Grapevine biology and adaptation to viticulture. *Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.* 6, 74-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2000.tb00165.x

Haroldsen, V. M., Chi-Ham, C. L., Kulkarni, S., Lorence, A., and Bennett, A. B. (2011). Constitutively expressed DHAR and MDHAR influence fruit, but not foliar ascorbate levels in tomato. *Plant Physiol. Biochem.* 49, 1244-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.08.003

Higginson, E. G. (2015). *The Genetic Basis of Acid Composition in Developing Berries of the Cultivated Grapevine Vitis vinifera*. Ph.D. thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide.

Higginson, E. G., Lloyd, N. D. R., Kravchuk, O., Ford, C. M., and Thomas, M. R. (2016). A high-throughput UHPLC MS/MS method for evaluation of tartaric and malic acid concentration in individual grapevine berries. *Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.* 22, 16-23. doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12170

Horemans, N., Szarka, A., De Bock, M., Raeymaekers, T., Potters, G., Levine, M., et al. (2008). Dehydroascorbate and glucose are taken up into *Arabidopsis thaliana* cell cultures by two distinct mechanisms. *FEBS Lett.* 582, 2714-2718. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.07.001

Horn, P. J. (2021). Where do the electrons go? How numerous redox processes drive phytochemical diversity. *Phytochem. Rev.* doi: 10.1007/s11101-020-09738-w

Houel, C., Chatbanyong, R., Doligez, A., Rienth, M., Foria, S., Luchaire, N., et al. (2015). Identification of stable QTLs for vegetative and reproductive traits in the microvine (*Vitis vinifera* L.) using the 18 K Infinium chip. *BMC Plant Biol.* 15:205. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0588-0

Hrazdina, G., Parsons, G. F., and Mattick, L. R. (1984). Physiological and biochemical events during development and maturation of grape berries. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic.* 35, 220-227.

Hudina, M., and Stampar, F. (2000). Sugars and organic acids contents of European (*Pyrus Communis* L.) and Asian (*Pyrus Serotina* REHD.) pear cultivars. *Acta Aliment* 29, 217-230. doi: 10.1556/AAlim.29.2000.3.2

Izawa, T. (2007). Adaptation of flowering-time by natural and artificial selection in *Arabidopsis* and rice. *J. Exp. Bot.* 58, 3091-3097. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm159

Jia, Y. (2015). *Molecular and Structural Characterization of the Candidate Enzymes Responsible for tartaric Acid Synthesis in the Grapevine*. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide.

Jia, Y., Burbidge, C. A., Sweetman, C., Schutz, E., Soole, K., Jenkins, C., et al. (2019). An aldo-keto reductase with 2-keto-L-gulonate reductase activity functions in L-tartaric acid biosynthesis from vitamin C in *Vitis vinifera*. *J. Biol. Chem.* 294, 15932-15946. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.010196

Jia, Y., Wong, D. C. J., Sweetman, C., Bruning, J. B., and Ford, C. M. (2015). New insights into the evolutionary history of plant sorbitol dehydrogenase. *BMC Plant Biol.* 15:101. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0478-5
Jiang, G., Zeng, J., Li, Z., Song, Y., Yan, H., He, J., et al. (2020). Redox regulation of the NOR transcription factor is involved in the regulation of fruit ripening in tomato. *Plant Physiol.* 183, 671–685. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00070

Jimenez, A., Creissen, G., Kular, B., Firmin, J., Robinson, S., Verhoeyen, M., et al. (2002). Changes in oxidative processes and components of the antioxidant system during tomato fruit ripening. *Planta* 214, 751–758. doi: 10.1007/s004250100667

Kärkönen, A., Dewhirst, R. A., Mackay, C. L., and Fry, S. C. (2017). Metabolites of 2,3-diketogulonate delay peroxidase action and induce non-enzymic H₂O₂ generation: Potential roles in the plant cell wall. *Arch. Biochem. Biophys.* 620, 12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2017.03.006

Karpinska, B., Zhang, K., Rasool, B., Pastok, D., Morris, J., Verrall, S. R., et al. (2018). The redox state of the apoplast influences the acclimation of photosynthesis and leaf metabolism to changing irradiance. *Plant Cell Environ.* 41, 1083–1097. doi: 10.1111/pce.12960

Keller, M., and Shrestha, P. M. (2014). Solute accumulation differs in the vacuoles and apoplast of ripening grape berries. *Planta* 239, 633–642. doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-2004-z

Kliewer, W. (1971). Effect of day temperature and light intensity on concentration of malic and tartaric acids in *Vitis vinifera* L. grapes. *J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.* 96, 372–377.

Kliewer, W. M. (1966). Sugars and organic acids of *Vitis vinifera*. *Plant Physiol.* 41, 923–931. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.6.923

Kliewer, W. M. (1973). Berry composition of *Vitis vinifera* cultivars as influenced by photo- and nycto-temperatures during maturation. *J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.* 98, 153–159.

Kliewer, W. M., Howarth, L., and Omori, M. (1967). Concentrations of tartaric acid and malic acids and their salts in *Vitis vinifera* grapes. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic.* 18, 42–54.

Kliewer, W. M., and Nassar, A. R. (1966). Changes in concentration of organic acids, sugars, and amino acids in grape leaves. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic.* 17, 48–57.

Kohn, L. D., and Jakoby, W. B. (1968). Tartaric acid metabolism. 3. The formation of glyceric acid. *J. Biol. Chem.* 243, 2465–2471.

Kotchoni, S. O., Larrimore, K. E., Mukherjee, M., Kempinski, C. F., and Barth, C. (2009). Alterations in the endogenous ascorbic acid content affect flowering time in *Arabidopsis*. *Plant Physiol.* 149, 803–815. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.132324

Krieger-Liszkay, A., Fufezan, C., and Trebst, A. (2008). Singlet oxygen production in photosystem II and related protection mechanism. *Photosynth. Res.* 98, 551–564. doi: 10.1007/s11120-008-9349-3

Kumar, R. S., Shen, C.-H., Wu, P.-Y., Suresh Kumar, S., Hua, M. S., and Yeh, K.-W. (2016). Nitric oxide participates in plant flowering repression by ascorbate. *Sci. Rep.* 6:35246. doi: 10.1038/srep35246

Kwon, S.-Y., Choi, S.-M., Ahn, Y.-O., Lee, H.-S., Lee, H.-B., Park, Y.-M., et al. (2003). Enhanced stress-tolerance of transgenic tobacco plants expressing a human dehydroascorbate reductase gene. *J. Plant Physiol.* 160, 347–353. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-00926

Laing, W. A., Martínez-Sánchez, M., Wright, M. A., Bulley, S. M., Brewster, D., Dare, A. P., et al. (2015). An upstream open reading frame is essential for feedback regulation of ascorbate biosynthesis in *Arabidopsis*. *Plant Cell* 27, 772–786. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.133777

Lecourieux, F., Kappel, C., Pieri, P., Charon, J., Pillet, J., Hilbert, G., et al. (2017). Dissecting the biochemical and transcriptomic effects of a locally applied heat treatment on developing Cabernet Sauvignon grape berries. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 8:53. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00053

Leng, X., Jia, H., Sun, X., Shangguan, L., Mu, Q., Wang, B., et al. (2015). Comparative transcriptome analysis of grapevine in response to copper stress. *Sci. Rep.* 5:17749. doi: 10.1038/srep17749

Lewis, Y. S., and Neelakanthan, S. (1959). Synthesis of tartaric acid in tamarind leaves. *Curr. Sci.* 28, 152–153.

Li, B., Yongku, L., Wang, X., Wang, F., Wang, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2015). Simultaneous separation and determination of organic acids in blueberry juices by capillary electrophoresis- electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. *J. Food Sci. Technol.* 52, 5228–5235. doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1611-4

Liang, Z., Duan, S., Sheng, J., Zhu, S., Ni, X., Shao, J., et al. (2019). Whole-genome resequencing of 472 *Vitis* accessions for grapevine diversity and demographic history analyses. *Nat. Commun.* 10:1190. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09135-8

Liang, Z., Sang, M., Ma, A., Zhao, S., Zhong, G.-y., and Li, S. (2011). Inheritance of sugar and acid contents in the ripe berries of a tetraploid × diploid grape cross population. *Euphytica* 182:251. doi: 10.1007/s10681-011-0487-x

Lijavetzky, D., Carbonell-Bejerano, P., Grimplet, J., Bravo, G., Flores, P., Fenoll, J., et al. (2012). Berry flesh and skin ripening features in *Vitis vinifera* as assessed by transcriptional profiling. *PLoS One* 7:e39547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039547

Liu, H.-F., Wu, B.-H., Fan, P.-G., Xu, H.-Y., and Li, S.-H. (2007). Inheritance of sugars and acids in berries of grape (*Vitis vinifera* L.). *Euphytica* 153, 99–107. doi: 10.1007/s10681-006-9246-9

Loewus, F. A. (1999). Biosynthesis and metabolism of ascorbic acid in plants and of analogs of ascorbic acid in fungi. *Phytochemistry* 52, 193–210. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00145-4

Lord, R. S., Burdette, C. K., and Bralley, J. A. (2005). Significance of urinary tartaric acid. *Clin. Chem.* 51, 672–673. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.036368

Ma, L., Sun, L., Guo, Y., Lin, H., Liu, Z., Li, K., et al. (2020). Transcriptome analysis of table grapes (*Vitis vinifera* L.) identified a gene network module associated with berry firmness. *PLoS One* 15:e0237526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237526

Mahmood, T., Anwar, F., Abbas, M., Boyce, M. C., and Saari, N. (2012). Compositional variation in sugars and organic acids at different maturity stages in selected small fruits from Pakistan. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.* 13, 1380–1392. doi: 10.3390/ijms13021380

Malacarne, G., Coller, E., Czemmel, S., Rvhovsek, U., Engelen, K., Goremykin, V., et al. (2016). The grapevine VvibZIPC22 transcription factor is involved in the regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis. *J. Exp. Bot.* 67, 3509–3522. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw181

Malipiero, U., Ruffner, H. P., and Rast, D. M. (1987). Ascorbic to tartaric acid conversion in grapevines. *J. Plant Physiol.* 129, 33–40. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(87)80099-8

Maoz, I., De Rosso, M., Kaplunov, T., Vedova, A. D., Sela, N., Flamini, R., et al. (2019). Metabolomic and transcriptomic changes underlying cold and anaerobic stresses after storage of table grapes. *Sci. Rep.* 9:2917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39253-8

Massonnet, M., Fasoli, M., Tornielli, G. B., Altieri, M., Sandri, M., Zuccolotto, P., et al. (2017). Ripening transcriptomic program in red and white grapevine varieties correlates with berry skin anthocyanin accumulation. *Plant Physiol.* 174, 2376–2396. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00311

Maurino, V. G., Grube, E., Zielinski, J., Schild, A., Fischer, K., and Flügge, U.-I. (2006). Identification and expression analysis of twelve members of the nucleobase-ascorbate transporter (NAT) gene family in *Arabidopsis thaliana*. *Plant Cell Physiol.* 47, 1381–1393. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcl011

McGovern, P. E., Glusker, D. L., Exner, L. J., and Voigt, M. M. (1996). Neolithic resinated wine. *Nature* 381, 480–481. doi: 10.1038/381480a0

Melino, V., Soole, K., and Ford, C. (2009a). Ascorbate metabolism and the developmental demand for tartaric and oxalic acids in ripening grape berries. *BMC Plant Biol.* 9:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9_145

Melino, V., Soole, K., and Ford, C. (2009b). A method for determination of fruit-derived ascorbic, tartaric, oxalic and malic acids, and its application to the study of ascorbic acid catabolism in grapevines. *Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.* 15, 293–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00062.x

Melino, V. J. (2009). Ascorbate Metabolism in Grape Berries During Development. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide.

Melino, V. J., Hayes, M., Soole, K. L., and Ford, C. M. (2011). The role of light in the regulation of ascorbate metabolism during berry development in the cultivated grapevine *Vitis vinifera* L. *J. Sci. Food Agric.* 91, 1712–1721. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4376

Mirica, L. M., and Klinman, J. P. (2008). The nature of O₂ activation by the ethylene-forming enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 105, 1814–1819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.07116-26105

Miyaji, T., Kuromori, T., Takeuchi, Y., Yamaji, N., Yokosho, K., Shimazawa, A., et al. (2015). AtPHT4;4 is a chloroplast-localized ascorbate transporter in *Arabidopsis*. *Nat. Commun.* 6:5928. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6928

Mohammadrezakhani, S., Hajilou, J., Rezanejad, F., and Zaare-Nahandi, F. (2019). Assessment of exogenous application of proline on antioxidant compounds in three *Citrus* species under low temperature stress. *J. Plant Interact.* 14, 347–358. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2019.1629033
Moretto, M., Sonego, P., Pilati, S., Malacarne, G., Costantini, L., Grzeskowiak, L., et al. (2016). VESPUCCI: Exploring patterns of gene expression in grapevine. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 7:633. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00633

Moskowitz, A. H., and Hrazdina, G. (1981). Vacuolar contents of fruit subepidermal cells from *Vitis* species. *Plant Physiol.* 68, 686-692. doi: 10.1104/ pp.68.3.686

Müller-Moulé, P., Golan, T., and Niyogi, K. K. (2004). Ascorbate-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis grow in high light despite chronic photooxidative stress. *Plant Physiol.* 134, 1163-1172. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.032375

Muñoz, P., and Munné-Bosch, S. (2018). Photo-oxidative stress during leaf, flower and fruit development. *Plant Physiol.* 176, 1004-1014. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01127

Narnoliya, L. K., Kaushal, G., and Singh, S. P. (2019). Long noncoding RNAs and miRNAs regulating terpene and tartaric acid biosynthesis in rose-scented geranium. *FEBS Lett.* 593, 2235-2249. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13493

Narnoliya, L. K., Sangwan, R. S., and Singh, S. P. (2018). Transcriptome mining and in silico structural and functional analysis of ascorbic acid and tartaric acid biosynthesis pathway enzymes in rose-scented geranium. *Mol. Biol. Rep.* 45, 315-326. doi: 10.1007/s11033-018-4164-1

Negri, A. S., Prinsi, B., Rossoni, M., Failla, O., Scienza, A., Cocucci, M., et al. (2008). Proteome changes in the skin of the grape cultivar Barbera among different stages of ripening. *BMC Genomics* 9:378. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-378

Noctor, G. (2006). Metabolic signalling in defence and stress: the central roles of soluble redox couples. *Plant Cell Environ.* 29, 409-425. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 3040.2005.01476.x

Nour, V., Trandafir, I., and Ionica, M. E. (2010). HPLC organic acid analysis in different citrus juices under reversed phase conditions. *Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobot. Cluj.* 38, 44-48. doi: 10.15835/nbha3814569

Obata, T. (2019). Metabolons in plant primary and secondary metabolism. *Phytochem. Rev.* 18, 1483-1507. doi: 10.1007/s11101-019-09619-x

Okuda, T., and Yokotsuka, K. (1999). Levels of glutathione and activities of related enzymes during ripening of Koshu and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes and during winemaking. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic.* 50, 264-270.

Ollat, N., and Gaudillère, J. (2000). Carbon balance in developing grapevine berries. *Acta Hortic.* 526, 345-350. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.526.37

Otten, L., Crouzet, P., Salomone, J. Y., Ruffray, P. D., and Szegedi, E. (1995). *Agrobacterium vitis* strain AB3 harbors two independent tartrate utilization systems, one of which is encoded by the Ti plasmid. *Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact.* 8, 138-146. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-8-0138

Palliotti, A., and Cartechini, A. (2001). Developmental changes in gas exchange activity in flowers, berries, and tendrils of field-grown Cabernet Sauvignon. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic.* 52, 317-323.

Parsons, H. T., Yasmin, T., and Fry, S. C. (2011). Alternative pathways of dehydroascorbic acid degradation *in vitro* and in plant cell cultures: novel insights into vitamin C catabolism. *Biochem. J.* 440, 375-385. doi: 10.1042/ BJ20110939

Pastore, C., Zenoni, S., Tornielli, G. B., Allegro, G., Dal Santo, S., Valentini, G., et al. (2011). Increasing the source/sink ratio in *Vitis vinifera* (cv Sangiovese) induces extensive transcriptome reprogramming and modifies berry ripening. *BMC Genomics* 12:631. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-631

Pastori, G. M., Kiddle, G., Antoniw, J., Bernard, S., Veljovic-Jovanovic, S., Verrier, P. J., et al. (2003). Leaf vitamin C contents modulate plant defense transcripts and regulate genes that control development through hormone signaling. *Plant Cell* 15, 939-951. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010538

Patel, J. (2008). *Identification and Localization of AtALMT9-like Vacuolar Malate Transporters from Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)*. Masters thesis, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide.

Pedreschi, R., Uarrota, V., Fuentealba, C., Alvaro, J. E., Olmedo, P., Deflippi, B. G., et al. (2019). Primary metabolism in avocado fruit. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 10:795. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00795

Pignocchi, C., Fletcher, J. M., Wilkinson, J. E., Barnes, J. D., and Foyer, C. H. (2003). The function of ascorbate oxidase in tobacco. *Plant Physiol.* 132, 1631-1641. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.022798

Pignocchi, C., and Foyer, C. H. (2003). Apoplastic ascorbate metabolism and its role in the regulation of cell signalling. *Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.* 6, 379-389. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00069-4

Pignocchi, C., Kiddle, G., Hernández, I., Foster, S. J., Asensi, A., Taybi, T., et al. (2006). Ascorbate oxidase-dependent changes in the redox state of the apoplast modulate gene transcript accumulation leading to modified hormone signaling

and orchestration of defense processes in tobacco. *Plant Physiol.* 141, 423-435. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.078469

Pilati, S., Bagagli, G., Sonego, P., Moretto, M., Brazzale, D., Castorina, G., et al. (2017). Abscisic acid is a major regulator of grape berry ripening onset: New insights into ABA signaling network. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 8:1093. doi: 10.3389/fpls. 2017.01093

Pilati, S., Brazzale, D., Guella, G., Milli, A., Ruberti, C., Biasioli, F., et al. (2014). The onset of grapevine berry ripening is characterized by ROS accumulation and lipoxygenase-mediated membrane peroxidation in the skin. *BMC Plant Biol.* 14:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-87

Pilati, S., Perazzolli, M., Malossini, A., Cestaro, A., Demattè, L., Fontana, P., et al. (2007). Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of grapevine berry ripening reveals a set of genes similarly modulated during three seasons and the occurrence of an oxidative burst at vèraison. *BMC Genomics* 8:428. doi: 10.1186/ 1471-2164-8-428

Plane, R. A., Mattick, L. R., and Weirs, L. D. (1980). An acidity index for the taste of wines. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic.* 31, 265-268.

Pnueli, L., Liang, H., Rozenberg, M., and Mittler, R. (2003). Growth suppression, altered stomatal responses, and augmented induction of heat shock proteins in cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (Apx1)-deficient *Arabidopsis* plants. *Plant J.* 34, 187-203. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01715.x

Podgórska, A., Burian, M., and Szal, B. (2017). Extra-cellular but extra-ordinarily important for cells: Apoplastic reactive oxygen species metabolism. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 8:1353. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01353

Potters, G., Horemans, N., Caubergs, R. J., and Asard, H. (2000). Ascorbate and dehydroascorbate influence cell cycle progression in a tobacco cell suspension. *Plant Physiol.* 124, 17-20. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.1.17

Rattanakon, S., Ghan, R., Gambetta, G. A., Deluc, L. G., Schlauch, K. A., and Cramer, G. R. (2016). Abscisic acid transcriptomic signaling varies with grapevine organ. *BMC Plant Biol.* 16:72. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016- 0763-y

Ren, C., Liu, X., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Duan, W., Li, S., et al. (2016). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in Chardonnay (*Vitis vinifera* L.). *Sci. Rep.* 6:32289. doi: 10.1038/srep32289

Reshef, N., Walbaum, N., Agam, N., and Fait, A. (2017). Sunlight modulates fruit metabolic profile and shapes the spatial pattern of compound accumulation within the grape cluster. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 8:70. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00070

Ribereau-Gayon, P., Glories, Y., Maujean, A., and Dubourdieu, D. (2006). *Handbook of Enology. The Chemistry of Wine Stabilization and Treatments*. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.

Rienth, M., Torregrosa, L., Kelly, M. T., Luchaire, N., Pellegrino, A., Grimplet, J., et al. (2014). Is transcriptomic regulation of berry development more important at night than during the day? *PLoS One* 9:e88844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088844

Rienth, M., Torregrosa, L., Sarah, G., Ardisson, M., Brillouet, J.-M., and Romieu, C. (2016). Temperature desynchronizes sugar and organic acid metabolism in ripening grapevine fruits and remodels their transcriptome. *BMC Plant Biol.* 16:164. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0850-0

Rogiers, S. Y., Coetzee, Z. A., Walker, R. R., Deloire, A., and Tyerman, S. D. (2017). Potassium in the grape (*Vitis vinifera* L.) berry: Transport and function. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 8:1629. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01629

Rongala, J. (2008). *Identification and Localization of Vacuolar Organic Acid Carriers in Grapevine Berries*. Masters thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide.

Ruffner, H. P. (1982). Metabolism of tartaric and malic acids in *Vitis*: A review - Part A. *Vitis* 21, 247-259. doi: 10.5073/VITIS.1982.21.247-259

Ruffner, H. P., Hawker, J. S., and Hale, C. R. (1976). Temperature and enzymic control of malate metabolism in berries of *Vitis vinifera*. *Phytochemistry* 15, 1877-1880. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)88835-4

Rustioni, L., Fracassetti, D., Prinsi, B., Geuna, F., Ancelotti, A., Fauda, V., et al. (2020). Oxidations in white grape (*Vitis vinifera* L.) skins: comparison between ripening process and photooxidative sunburn symptoms. *Plant Physiol. Biochem.* 150, 270-278. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.03.003

Sadras, V. O., Petrie, P. R., and Moran, M. A. (2013). Effects of elevated temperature in grapevine. II juice pH, titratable acidity and wine sensory attributes. *Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.* 19, 107-115. doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12001

Saito, K., and Kasai, Z. (1968). Accumulation of tartaric acid in the ripening process of grapes. *Plant Cell Physiol.* 9, 529-537. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals. pcp.a079370
Saito, K., and Kasai, Z. (1969). Tartaric acid synthesis from L-ascorbic acid-1-¹⁴C in grape berries. *Phytochemistry* 8, 2177-2182. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00) 88177-7

Saito, K., and Kasai, Z. (1982). Conversion of L-ascorbic acid to L-idonic acid, L-idono-gamma-lactone and 2-keto-L-idonic acid in slices of immature grapes. *Plant Cell Physiol.* 23, 499-507. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076374

Saito, K., and Kasai, Z. (1984). Synthesis of L-(+)-tartaric acid from L-ascorbic acid via 5-keto-D-gluconic acid in grapes. *Plant Physiol.* 76, 170-174. doi: 10.1104/ pp.76.1.170

Saito, K., and Loewus, F. A. (1989). Formation of L-(+)-tartaric acid in leaves of the bean, *Phaseolus vulgaris* L.: Radioisotopic studies with putative precursors. *Plant Cell Physiol.* 30, 629-636. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a077786

Salusjärvi, T., Povelainen, M., Hvorslev, N., Eneyskaya, E. V., Kulminskaya, A. A., Shabalin, K. A., et al. (2004). Cloning of a gluconate/polyol dehydrogenase gene from *Gluconobacter suboxydans* IFO 12528, characterisation of the enzyme and its use for the production of 5-ketoglucuronate in a recombinant *Escherichia coli* strain. *Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.* 65, 306-314. doi: 10.1007/s00253-004- 1594-6

Sanmartín, M., Drogoudi, P. A., Lyons, T., Pateraki, I., Barnes, J., and Kanellis, A. K. (2003). Over-expression of ascorbate oxidase in the apoplast of transgenic tobacco results in altered ascorbate and glutathione redox states and increased sensitivity to ozone. *Planta* 216, 918-928. doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0944-9

Savoi, S., Herrera, J. C., Forneck, A., and Griesser, M. (2019). Transcriptomics of the grape berry shrivel ripening disorder. *Plant Mol. Biol.* 100, 285-301. doi: 10.1007/s11103-019-00859-1

Savoi, S., Wong, D. C. J., Arapitsas, P., Miculan, M., Bucchetti, B., Peterlunger, E., et al. (2016). Transcriptome and metabolite profiling reveals that prolonged drought modulates the phenylpropanoid and terpenoid pathway in white grapes (*Vitis vinifera* L.). *BMC Plant Biol.* 16:67. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016- 0760-1

Savoi, S., Wong, D. C. J., Degu, A., Herrera, J. C., Bucchetti, B., Peterlunger, E., et al. (2017). Multi-omics and integrated network analyses reveal new insights into the systems relationships between metabolites, structural genes, and transcriptional regulators in developing grape berries (*Vitis vinifera* L.) exposed to water deficit. *Front. Plant. Sci.* 8:1124. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01124

Sawicki, M., Rondeau, M., Courteaux, B., Rabenoelina, F., Guerriero, G., Gomès, E., et al. (2019). On a cold night: transcriptomics of grapevine flower unveils signal transduction and impacted metabolism. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.* 20:1130. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051130

Sha, S., Li, J., Wu, J., and Zhang, S. (2011). Characteristics of organic acids in the fruit of different pear species. *Afr. J. Agric. Res.* 6, 2403-2410. doi: 10.5897/ AJAR11.316

Shangguan, L., Sun, X., Zhang, C., Mu, Q., Leng, X., and Fang, J. (2015). Genome identification and analysis of genes encoding the key enzymes involved in organic acid biosynthesis pathway in apple, grape, and sweet orange. *Sci. Hortic.* 185, 22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.01.012

Shimazu, Y., Uehara, M., and Watanabe, M. (1984). Decomposition of L-tartaric and L-malic acids in grape must by *Botrytis cinerea*. *Agric. Biol. Chem.* 48, 1565-1573. doi: 10.1080/00021369.1984.10866360

Shiraishi, M. (1995). Proposed descriptors for organic acids to evaluate grape germplasm. *Euphytica* 81, 13-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00022454

Shiraishi, M., Fujishima, H., and Chijima, H. (2010). Evaluation of table grape genetic resources for sugar, organic acid, and amino acid composition of berries. *Euphytica* 174, 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10681-009-0084-4

Shomura, A., Izawa, T., Ebana, K., Ebitani, T., Kanegae, H., Konishi, S., et al. (2008). Deletion in a gene associated with grain size increased yields during rice domestication. *Nat. Genet.* 40, 1023-1028. doi: 10.1038/ng.169

Silva, M. M., and Lidon, F. C. (2016). An overview on applications and side effects of antioxidant food additives. *Emir. J. Food Agric* 28, 823. doi: 10.9755/ejfa. 2016-07-806

Simson, M., and Debolt, S. (2012). 'Chambourcin' grapevine (*Vitis vinifera* Vitis L.) berries display sustained post-veraison accumulation of oxalic acid. *J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.* 87, 424-428. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2012.11512889

Smirnoff, N. (2000). Ascorbic acid: Metabolism and functions of a multi-faceted molecule. *Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.* 3, 229-235. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(00) 80070-9

Smirnoff, N. (2011). "Vitamin C: the metabolism and functions of ascorbic acid in plants," in *Adv. Bot. Res.*, eds F. Rébeillé and R. Douce (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 107-177.

Smirnoff, N. (2018). Ascorbic acid metabolism and functions: A comparison of plants and mammals. *Free Radic. Biol. Med.* 122, 116-129. doi: 10.1016/j. freeradbiomed.2018.03.033

Smirnoff, N., and Arnaud, D. (2019). Hydrogen peroxide metabolism and functions in plants. *New Phytol.* 221, 1197-1214. doi: 10.1111/nph.15488

Spayd, S. E., Tarara, J. M., Mee, D. L., and Ferguson, J. C. (2002). Separation of sunlight and temperature effects on the composition of *Vitis vinifera* cv. merlot berries. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic.* 53, 171-182.

Spiller, G. A., Story, J. A., Furumoto, E. J., Chezem, J. C., and Spiller, M. (2003). Effect of tartaric acid and dietary fibre from sun-dried raisins on colonic function and on bile acid and volatile fatty acid excretion in healthy adults. *Br. J. Nutr.* 90, 803-807. doi: 10.1079/BJN2003966

Stafford, H. A. (1959). Distribution of tartaric acid in the leaves of certain Angiosperms. *Am. J. Bot.* 46, 347-352. doi: 10.2307/2439194

Steelheart, C., Alegre, M. L., Baldet, P., Rothan, C., Bres, C., Just, D., et al. (2020). The effect of low ascorbic acid content on tomato fruit ripening. *Planta* 252:36. doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03440-z

Sun, X., Matus, J. T., Wong, D. C. J., Wang, Z., Chai, F., Zhang, L., et al. (2018). The GARP/MYB-related grape transcription factor AQUIMO improves cold tolerance and promotes the accumulation of raffinose family oligosaccharides. *J. Exp. Bot.* 69, 1749-1764. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery020

Sun, X., Zhang, L., Wong, D. C. J., Wang, Y., Zhu, Z., Xu, G., et al. (2019). The ethylene response factor VaERF092 from Amur grape regulates the transcription factor VaWRKY33, improving cold tolerance. *Plant J.* 99, 988-1002. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14378

Swanson, C. A., and El-Shishiny, E. D. (1958). Translocation of sugars in the concord grape. *Plant Physiol.* 33, 33-37. doi: 10.1104/pp.33.1.33

Sweetman, C., Sadras, V. O., Hancock, R. D., Soole, K. L., and Ford, C. M. (2014). Metabolic effects of elevated temperature on organic acid degradation in ripening *Vitis vinifera* fruit. *J. Exp. Bot.* 65, 5975-5988. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru343

Sweetman, C., Wong, D. C., Ford, C. M., and Drew, D. P. (2012). Transcriptome analysis at four developmental stages of grape berry (*Vitis vinifera* cv. Shiraz) provides insights into regulated and coordinated gene expression. *BMC Genomics* 13:691. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-691

Takimoto, K., Saito, K., and Kasai, Z. (1976). Diurnal change of tartrate dissimilation during the ripening of grapes. *Phytochemistry* 15, 927-930. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84372-1

Terrier, N., Deguilloux, C., Sauvage, F.-X., Martinoia, E., and Romieu, C. (1998). Proton pumps and anion transport in *Vitis vinifera*: the inorganic pyrophosphatase plays a predominant role in the energization of the tonoplast. *Plant Physiol. Biochem.* 36, 367-377. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(98)80078-8

Tian, Z., Wang, X., Lee, R., Li, Y., Specht, J. E., Nelson, R. L., et al. (2010). Artificial selection for determinate growth habit in soybean. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 107, 8563-8568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000088107

Timm, S., Nunes-Nesi, A., Pärnik, T., Morgenthal, K., Wienkoop, S., Keerberg, O., et al. (2008). A cytosolic pathway for the conversion of hydroxypyruvate to glycerate during photorespiration in *Arabidopsis. Plant Cell* 20, 2848-2859. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.062265

Underhill, F. P., Leonard, C. S., Gross, E. G., and Jaleski, T. C. (1931). Studies on the metabolism of tartrates II. The behavior of tartrate in the organism of the rabbit, dog, rat and guinea pig. *J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.* 43, 359-380.

Upadhyay, A., Gaonkar, T., Upadhyay, A. K., Jogaiah, S., Shinde, M. P., Kadoo, N. Y., et al. (2018). Global transcriptome analysis of grapevine (*Vitis vinifera* L.) leaves under salt stress reveals differential response at early and late stages of stress in table grape cv. Thompson Seedless. *Plant Physiol. Biochem.* 129, 168-179. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.05.032

Ushimaru, T., Nakagawa, T., Fujioka, Y., Daicho, K., Naito, M., Yamauchi, Y., et al. (2006). Transgenic *Arabidopsis* plants expressing the rice dehydroascorbate reductase gene are resistant to salt stress. *J. Plant Physiol.* 163, 1179-1184. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.10.002

Van den Bilcke, N., Alaerts, K., Ghaffaripour, S., Simbo, D. J., and Samson, R. (2014). Physico-chemical properties of tamarind (*Tamarindus indica* L.) fruits from Mali: selection of elite trees for domestication. *Genet. Resour. Crop Evol.* 61, 537-553. doi: 10.1007/s10722-014-0080-y
Vannozzi, A., Wong, D. C. J., Höll, J., Hmmam, I., Matus, J. T., Bogs, J., et al. (2018). Combinatorial regulation of stilbene synthase genes by WRKY and MYB transcription factors in grapevine (*Vitis vinifera* L.). *Plant Cell Physiol.* 59, 1043–1059. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy045

Vaughn, R. H., Marsh, G. L., Stadtman, T. C., and Cantino, B. C. (1946). Decomposition of tartrates by the Coliform bacteria. *J. Bacteriol.* 52, 311–325. doi: 10.1128/jb.52.3.311-325.1946

Viana, A. P., Riaz, S., and Walker, M. A. (2013). Genetic dissection of agronomic traits within a segregating population of breeding table grapes. *Genet. Mol. Res.* 12, 951–964. doi: 10.4238/2013.April.2.11

Wada, H., Shackel, K. A., and Matthews, M. A. (2008). Fruit ripening in *Vitis vinifera*: apoplastic solute accumulation accounts for pre-veraison turgor loss in berries. *Planta* 227, 1351–1361. doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0707-3

Wagner, G., and Loewus, F. A. (1974). L-ascorbic acid metabolism in Vitaceae: Conversion to (+)-tartaric acid and hexoses. *Plant Physiol.* 54, 784–787. doi: 10.1104/pp.54.5.784

Wagner, G., Yang, J. C., and Loewus, F. A. (1975). Stereoisomeric characterization of tartaric acid produced during L-ascorbic acid metabolism in plants. *Plant Physiol.* 55, 1071–1073. doi: 10.1104/pp.55.6.1071

Walker, R. P., and Famiani, F. (2018). “Organic acids in fruits: metabolism, functions and contents,” in *Horticultural Reviews*, ed. I. Warrington (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons), 371–430. doi: 10.1002/9781119431077.ch8

Wang, H. C., Huang, H. B., Huang, X. M., and Hu, Z. Q. (2006). Sugar and acid compositions in the arils of *Litchi chinensis* Sonn.: cultivar differences and evidence for the absence of succinic acid. *J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.* 81, 57–62. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2006.11512029

Wei, L., Cao, Y., Cheng, J., Xiang, J., Shen, B., and Wu, J. (2020). Comparative transcriptome analyses of a table grape 'Summer Black' and its early-ripening mutant 'Tiangong Moyu' identify candidate genes potentially involved in berry development and ripening. *J. Plant Interact.* 15, 213–222. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2020.1760367

Wen, Y.-Q., Cui, J., Zhang, Y., Duan, C.-Q., and Pan, Q.-H. (2014). Comparison of organic acid levels and L-*IdnDH* expression in Chinese-type and European-type grapes. *Euphytica* 196, 63–76. doi: 10.1007/s10681-013-1014-z

Wen, Y.-Q., Li, J.-M., Zhang, Z.-Z., Zhang, Y.-F., and Pan, Q.-H. (2010). Antibody preparation, gene expression and subcellular localization of L-idonate dehydrogenase in grape berry. *Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.* 74, 2413–2417. doi: 10.1271/bbb.100448

Whitelaw-Weckert, M. A., Whitelaw, E. S., Rogiers, S. Y., Quirk, L., Clark, A. C., and Huang, C. X. (2011). Bacterial inflorescence rot of grapevine caused by *Pseudomonas syringae* pv. *syringae*. *Plant Pathol.* 60, 325–337. doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-3059.2010.02377.x

Williams, M., and Loewus, F. A. (1978). Biosynthesis of (+)-tartaric acid from L-[4-¹⁴C] ascorbic acid in grape and geranium. *Plant Physiol.* 61, 672–674. doi: 10.1104/pp.61.4.672

Winkel, B. S. J. (2004). Metabolic channeling in plants. *Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.* 55, 85–107. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141714

Wong, D. C. J. (2020). Network aggregation improves gene function prediction of grapevine gene co-expression networks. *Plant Mol. Biol.* 103, 425–441. doi: 10.1007/s11103-020-01001-2

Wyman, H., and Palmer, J. K. (1964). Organic acids in the ripening banana fruit. *Plant Physiol.* 39, 630–633. doi: 10.1104/pp.39.4.630

Xiao, Z., Rogiers, S. Y., Sadras, V. O., and Tyerman, S. D. (2018). Hypoxia in grape berries: the role of seed respiration and lenticels on the berry pedicel and the possible link to cell death. *J. Exp. Bot.* 69, 2071–2083. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery039

Yin, L., Wang, S., Eltayeb, A. E., Uddin, M. I., Yamamoto, Y., Tsuji, W., et al. (2010). Overexpression of dehydroascorbate reductase, but not monodehydroascorbate reductase, confers tolerance to aluminum stress in transgenic tobacco. *Planta* 231, 609–621. doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-1075-3

Yum, D.-Y., Lee, B.-Y., Hahm, D.-H., and Pan, J.-G. (1998). The *yiaE* gene, located at 80.1 minutes on the *Escherichia coli* chromosome, encodes a 2-ketoaldonate reductase. *J. Bacteriol.* 180, 5984–5988. doi: 10.1128/JB.180.22.5984-5988.1998

Zechmann, B. (2011). Subcellular distribution of ascorbate in plants. *Plant Signal. Behav.* 6, 360–363. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.3.14342

Zhang, X.-Y., Wang, X.-L., Wang, X.-F., Xia, G.-H., Pan, Q.-H., Fan, R.-C., et al. (2006). A shift of phloem unloading from symplastic to apoplasmic pathway is involved in developmental onset of ripening in grape berry. *Plant Physiol.* 142, 220–232. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.081430

Zhang, Z., Liang, X., Lu, L., Xu, Z., Huang, J., He, H., et al. (2020a). Two glyoxylate reductase isoforms are functionally redundant but required under high photorespiration conditions in rice. *BMC Plant Biol.* 20:357. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02568-0

Zhang, Z., Liu, H., Sun, J., Yu, S., He, W., Li, T., et al. (2020b). Nontarget metabolomics of grape seed metabolites produced by various scion-rootstock combinations. *J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.* 145:247. doi: 10.21273/jashs04844-19

Zoecklein, B. W., Fugelsang, K. C., Gump, B. H., and Nury, F. S. (1995). *Wine Analysis and Production*. Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc.

**Conflict of Interest:** The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Burbidge, Ford, Melino, Wong, Jia, Jenkins, Soole, Castellarin, Darriet, Rienth, Bonghi, Walker, Famiani and Sweetman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.