# Enceladus and Titan: emerging worlds of the Solar System

Ali H. Sulaiman, Nicholas Achilleos, Cesar Bertucci, Andrew Coates, Michele Dougherty, Lina Hadid, Mika Holmberg, Hsiang-Wen Hsu, Tomoki Kimura, William Kurth, et al.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

To cite this version:

Ali H. Sulaiman, Nicholas Achilleos, Cesar Bertucci, Andrew Coates, Michele Dougherty, et al., *Enceladus and Titan: emerging worlds of the Solar System*. Experimental Astronomy, 2022, 54, pp.849-876.
10.1007/s10686-021-09810-z . insu-03463351v2

HAL Id: insu-03463351

https://insu.hal.science/insu-03463351v2

Submitted on 17 Mar 2023

**HAL** is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

# Enceladus and Titan: emerging worlds of the Solar System

Ali H. Sulaiman¹ · Nicholas Achilleos² · Cesar Bertucci³ · Andrew Coates⁴,⁵ ·

Michele Dougherty⁶ · Lina Hadid⁷ · Mika Holmberg⁸ · Hsiang-Wen Hsu⁹ ·

Tomoki Kimura¹⁰ · William Kurth¹ · Alice Le Gall¹¹ · James McKevitt⁴,¹² ·

Michiko Morooka¹³ · Go Murakami¹⁴ · Leonardo Regoli¹⁵ · Elias Roussos¹⁶ ·

Joachim Saur¹⁷ · Oleg Shebanits¹⁴ · Anezina Solomonidou¹⁸ ·

Jan-Erik Wahlund¹³ · J. Hunter Waite¹⁹

Received: 28 July 2020 / Accepted: 15 October 2021 / Published online: 1 December 2021

© The Author(s) 2021

## Abstract

Some of the major discoveries of the recent *Cassini-Huygens* mission have put Titan and Enceladus firmly on the Solar System map. The mission has revolutionised our view of Solar System satellites, arguably matching their scientific importance with that of their host planet. While *Cassini-Huygens* has made big surprises in revealing Titan’s organically rich environment and Enceladus’ cryovolcanism, the mission’s success naturally leads us to further probe these findings. We advocate the acknowledgement of Titan and Enceladus science as highly relevant to ESA’s long-term roadmap, as logical follow-on to *Cassini-Huygens*. In this White Paper, we will outline important science questions regarding these satellites and identify the science themes we recommend ESA cover during the Voyage 2050 planning cycle. Addressing these science themes would make major advancements to the present knowledge we have about the Solar System, its formation, evolution, and likelihood that other habitable environments exist outside the Earth’s biosphere.

**Keywords** Titan · Enceladus · Voyage 2050

White paper submitted in response to Voyage 2050 long-term plan in the ESA Science Programme.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

Extended author information available on the last page of the article

<footnote>Ali H. Sulaiman
ali-sulaiman@uiowa.edu</footnote>

<footnote>Nicholas Achilleos</footnote>
# 1 Introduction

## 1.1 Why explore Titan?

From *Voyager 1*'s glimpse of a hazy atmosphere to the successful entry and landing of the *Huygens* probe, Saturn's largest moon, Titan, remains an enigmatic Solar System body [100, 52]. Arguably the closest resembling Solar-System body to the Earth, Titan boasts a diverse landscape of lakes and rivers that are kept 'flowing' by the methane cycle - a striking parallel with the water cycle on Earth. Moreover, its thick, hazy atmosphere is sustained by a whole host of chemical processes that create complex organic compounds. For these reasons, we advocate Titan exploration as one of ESA's science priorities in the pursuit of emerging worlds in our Solar System and its potential to inform us about exotic exoplanetary systems.

## 1.2 Why explore Enceladus?

Enceladus is another unique planetary body. It is a small active moon that hides a global ocean under its thick icy crust. In its south polar region, the ocean material escapes through cracks in the ice. The escaping material forms a large plume of salty water that is rich in organic chemical compounds [24, 74, 104, 119]. Such key chemicals, in concert with ongoing hydrothermal activities and a tidally heated interior, make Enceladus a prime location for the search of a habitable world beyond the Earth. Enceladus science should be highly relevant to ESA's goals in the next planning cycle and we recommend the acknowledgement that exploring Enceladus can make major advancements, as well as provide a unique opportunity to answering outstanding questions on habitability and the workings of the Solar System.

# 2 Overarching science themes

Figure 1 shows the locations and scales of major satellites in Saturn's systems. The exploration of Titan and Enceladus will address science themes that are central to ESA's existing Cosmic Vision programme, particularly on **habitability** and **workings of the Solar System**. The remarkable discoveries revealed by *Cassini-Huygens*, led to the proposal of a Large-class mission in response to the Cosmic Vision call with the goal of exploring Titan and Enceladus [19]. The proposal was accepted for further studies, however did not go further. Over the last decade, numerous NASA missions have been proposed to build on the successes of *Cassini-Huygens* and explore these emerging worlds. In June 2019, NASA selected *Dragonfly* as their next New Frontiers mission to advance the search for the building blocks of life on Titan.

We advocate for these overarching themes since they encompass some of human-kind's biggest open questions and should therefore remain a priority in ESA's next planning cycle. Missions to Titan and Enceladus would not only be a natural and

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 1 Locations and scales of major satellites in Saturn’s system. Credit: David Seal, NASA/JPL</figcaption></figure>

logical follow-on to the successes of *Cassini-Huygens*; they would provide opti-
mal laboratories to test questions pertaining to these overarching themes, namely:
(i) What are the conditions for the emergence of life? (ii) How does the Solar Sys-
tem work? (iii) How are planetary bodies formed and how do they evolve? In addi-
tion to bringing multi-disciplinary Solar System science, addressing these questions
can enhance our knowledge of exoplanetary systems and therefore foster synergy
between Solar System scientists and the rapidly growing community of exoplanetary
scientists.

**3 Science themes for Titan**

**3.1 Titan's atmosphere**

Titan is well-known for its extensive atmosphere (e.g. [71, 115]). Because of its
composition and complex organic chemistry ([117]; Titan's atmosphere is thought
to be similar to that of early Earth, making it an obvious choice for studies on the
origin of life.

The first signs of significant chemical complexity in Titan’s atmosphere came
from *Voyager* images of the satellite, which was obscured by an orange haze with
a blue outer layer at the top of the atmosphere. This hid the surface from the vis-
ible cameras, and led Sagan et al. [86] to suggest tholins at Titan. *Cassini’s* instru-
ments were able to penetrate this with radar, infrared, and visible imaging, and the
*Huygens* probe descended through the atmosphere. From orbit, complex chemistry involving neutrals, cations, and anions [117, 14] was found.

Some of the remarkable new results from the *Cassini* mission included: the unexpected presence of heavy negatively charged molecular ions (up to 13,800 u/q) and dust/aerosol particles (e.g. [16, 22]) making up a global dusty ionosphere [92]; the formation of a ‘soup’ of organic (pre-biotic) compounds, including contributions to Titan’s signature orange haze, as shown in Fig. 2 (e.g. [117, 114]); the unexpected impact of the solar EUV on the un-Chapman-like ionosphere [2].

Titan’s atmospheric chemistry is initiated in the ionosphere (thermosphere) primarily by the solar EUV on the dayside and energetic particle influx on the nightside (e.g. [20, 91]). It should be noted that while remote sensing provides an excellent overview of Titan’s ionosphere (e.g. [48]), detailed studies require *in-situ* measurements, not in the least due to the influence of the heavy negative charge carriers – molecular ions and dust/aerosols.

It was postulated at Titan that the high mass anions would drift down through the atmosphere, as tholins, eventually reaching the surface causing the dunes and falling in the lakes. The observations showed the highest masses of anions at the lowest altitudes [15] with the density showing similar trends [123]. The first chemical models showed that the low mass anion species may be CN⁻, C₃N₄⁻, and C₅N₇⁻ [114]. Chemical schemes are only beginning to provide theories as to how the larger species can be produced. Charging models may explain how species of ~100 u could be ionized and aggregated to form >10,000 u molecules [50, 55], but only a few studies have looked at precise chemical routes for producing molecules >100 u. An example is the formation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) and more complex tholins, which are prebiotic polymer molecules, from simple hydrocarbons

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** Schematic representation of Titan’s complex atmospheric chemistry. Adapted from Waite et al. [117]</figcaption></figure>
and nitrogen available as aerosols in Titan's atmospheric haze. It is clear the whole picture of chemical chains connecting all species of molecules is unclear.

Dusty plasma in Titan's ionosphere (e.g. [93]) as well as Enceladus' plume (e.g. [67]) deserves special attention. Dusty plasma in space physics generally is a relatively new field, relevant for moon-produced plasma tori in Saturn and Jupiter systems, ionospheres of Earth (noctilucent clouds, e.g. [94]) and Saturn [68], cometary comas (e.g. [27]), and interstellar clouds [85]. For Titan's ionosphere, the dust in question may have different names (tholins, aerosols, dust grains, heavy negative ions) but generally refers to nm-sized grains or larger, with masses of more than a few hundred atomic mass units (e.g. [14, 51]). The lack of consensus on the nomenclature in fact underlines the recency of the field.

Titan's dust grains form in the *in-situ*-accessible ionosphere and are indeed impossible to measure with the available remote sensing methods. Dusty plasma is also important for the energy budget as it increases ionospheric conductivities [125]. Aerosols/dust grains in general are also relevant to cloud formation [3].

**Key measurements** Ultraviolet, visible, infrared, and millimeter/micrometer wave spectra will remotely constrain organic compounds in Titan's atmosphere and surface. High resolution mass/energy spectrometers and Langmuir probes will differentiate and constrain properties of neutrals, positive and negative ions, electrons, and aerosols/dust grains. Radio occultations will resolve structure of the atmosphere.

**Summary** Titan's atmosphere is an excellent laboratory to study pre-biotic organic chemistry that directly ties into the question of the origin of life, and it is one of the available sites to study dusty plasma, a rapidly emerging field in the space community.

**Key scientific question** What is the nature of atmospheric chemistry and cloud formation at Titan?

## 3.2 Titan's energy budget

Titan is the largest moon in the Saturnian system and the only moon in the Solar System known to harbor a significant atmosphere. The moon lacks an intrinsic magnetic field and its radial distance from the planet at 20 Saturn radii (1 Saturn radius = 60,268 km) places it very close to the nominal distance of the subsolar outermost boundary of Saturn's magnetosphere, which is not static in response to variations in the solar wind dynamic pressure. This means Titan is at times inside the magnetosphere of Saturn, and at other times outside making it fully exposed to the solar wind. All of this adds to a very complex plasma interaction, where the moon can encounter not only the corotating plasma from the Saturnian magnetosphere, but also shocked solar wind (e.g. [120]) and even unperturbed solar wind [7]. Figure 3 is an illustration summarizing the various physical and chemical processes that affect Titan's energy budget.
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3** Energy and mass balance at Titan. Adapted from Sittler et al. [99]</figcaption></figure>

### 3.2.1 Atmospheric evolution and space weathering

The surfaces and atmospheres of Saturnian moons are continuously irradiated with the magnetospheric plasma, solar photon, cosmic dust, and ring grains, all of which are responsible for long-term alteration of surface and atmospheric materials on geological timescales (Giga years), known as ‘space weathering’. The space weathering accompanies dissociation and synthesis of molecules in the materials, followed by modification in surface and atmospheric spectra.

Titan represents the epitome of a non-stationary interaction and only through a detailed exploration of its environment (with a space weathering perspective), can the escape mechanisms and the amount of atmospheric loss to Saturn’s magnetosphere and interplanetary space be appropriately addressed. The understanding of present-day escape conditions for Titan will contribute greatly to the elaboration of more realistic hypotheses about the evolution of Titan’s atmosphere in the past and also the importance of atmospheric evolution in relation to habitability.

While Mars represents an evolved system embedded in the solar wind without a global magnetic field, where most of the atmosphere has been lost, Titan represents a system that, even without a global field, is protected by the Saturnian magnetosphere (most of the time) and the presence of a thick atmosphere, with a composition similar to that of the early Earth. Thus, understanding the relative contribution of the different escape mechanisms is important to further enhancing our current understanding of atmospheric evolution in the Solar System and the conditions for habitability both in our Solar System and in exoplanets and exomoons. During the
Cassini era, several studies focused on understanding both the neutral escape (e.g. [113]) and ion escape (e.g. [17, 80]). However, current datasets are neither sufficient nor instructive enough to separate the complex interaction due to the large variability of the upstream conditions [83, 96, 4].

### 3.2.2 An early Earth

The atmosphere of Titan, composed mainly of $N_2$ (~94%) and $CH_4$ (~6%) has been likened to that of the primordial Earth, making this moon a natural environment to study processes that took place during the evolution of our own atmosphere. Modeling has shown Earth's early atmosphere may have been rich in hydrogen and methane [110]. Moreover, key organic molecules in terrestrial prebiotic chemistry, such as hydrogen cyanide (HCN), cyanoacetylene ($HC_3N$) and, cyanogen ($C_2N_2$), are formed at Titan [108].

**Key measurements** Plasma, neutral, and dust measurements will constrain influx and escape of material. Magnetic and electric field measurements will measure current systems that may arise and help constrain the energy budget of the system.

**Summary** Titan's atmosphere and surface are subjected to large variability in the ambient plasma and magnetic field by virtue of its orbit radius, continuous galactic cosmic rays, interplanetary dust, and solar photons. Altogether, these make the physical and chemical interactions of Titan and its environment inherently non-steady state at varying timescales.

**Key scientific questions** What is the response of Titan's atmosphere to extreme solar wind events, and how does it compare to quiescent events in the magnetosphere? What is the energy budget of Titan's atmosphere? Does Titan have an equilibrium state? How similar is Titan to an early Earth?

## 3.3 Titan's geology and interior

Titan has one of the most diverse surfaces across the Solar System, mainly due to its active methane cycle, which is somewhat analogous to the water cycle on Earth. Titan's complex surface has been modified by a variety of geological exogenic and/or endogenic processes. Some of the exogenic ones include impact cratering and aeolian/fluvial and/or lacustrine processes, while the endogenic ones include tectonism and potentially cryovolcanism (e.g. [25, 73, 42, 53, 57, 124]).

Titan's surface investigation is complicated by its atmosphere. The thick and dense atmosphere of Titan can only be penetrated remotely in specific windows at near-infrared and radar wavelengths. Before 2004 and the entry of *Cassini* in the Saturnian system, bright and dark albedo Titan features were observed in near-infrared images taken by ground based telescopes and the Hubble Space Telescope (e.g. [18]). The 13 years of Titan investigation by *Cassini* and *Huygens'* landing on the surface in 2005 eventually revealed a remarkably Earth-like
surface in terms of geomorphology, with dunes, highlands, dried and filled lakes, river channels, and more. The *Cassini* investigation also unveiled Titan to be an organic-rich world (e.g. [41, 61, 32]). Indeed, while Titan's crust is made of water ice, it is covered almost everywhere at the surface by a sedimentary organic layer of likely photochemical origin. The sediment materials are eroded, transported, and deposited from sources that are yet unclear, and organized to form landscapes that vary with latitude (dunes in the equatorial belts, plains at mid-latitude, labyrinthic terrains near the poles; [58, 102]). The role of the methane cycle in the landscape distribution on Titan is yet to be understood. In addition, even if sedimentary processes seem to dominate Titan's surface, some features also suggest tectonism and cryovolcanism. The pursuit of the study of Titan's surface composition and its connection with the interior may unveil locations that are of importance to astrobiology and the search for life in the Solar System.

After the *Cassini* golden era and despite the great number of ground-breaking discoveries made by the 127 *Cassini* flybys of Titan, there are still open questions regarding the formation and evolution of the surface, its chemical composition, and the interactions between the surface, the interior, and the atmosphere. September 2017 marked the end of the *Cassini* mission; by then, ~65% of the surface had been imaged by the radar instrument with a spatial resolution in the range of 300 m – 4 km, and only ~20% of the surface had been captured by the Visual and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (VIMS) with a resolution better than 10 km/pixel. It therefore remains terra incognita. The analysis of VIMS data provided significant results and insights on Titan's nature. However, the aforementioned resolution is not adequate for thorough and detailed investigation of the geology of a planetary body. In addition, the optimal use of surface data with *Cassini* instruments were made through the combinations of radar and VIMS data, which unfortunately were very limited due to the spacecraft's orbital constraints. In the future, such synergy between instruments would be of great value for a better understanding of Titan's geological history and evolution.

The *Cassini* and *Huygens* data, the multiple years of data analysis, laboratory studies, and theoretical and experimental modeling prompt the science goals for the future planetary missions to Titan. Below are a number of key features and processes at Titan. Figure 4 illustrates the multiple layers of Titan across which biosignatures could be transported.

### 3.3.1 Impact craters

The abundance and size distribution of impact craters usually provide insight into the relative age of planetary surfaces. Titan, compared to other Saturnian moons, displays a very limited number of impact craters on its surface, indicating a relatively young and active surface (e.g. [124]). Even though some studies have provided constraints [78, 69, 59], the surface age of Titan still remains uncertain (probably between 200 Ma and 1 Ga).
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 4** Diagram illustrating Titan's multiple layers from the atmosphere down to the interior and how biosignatures could also be transported from the subsurface ocean to the surface of Titan. (Image Credit: A. Karagiotas/T. Shalamberidze/NAI/JPL)</figcaption></figure>

### 3.3.2 Winds

One of the major geological processes on Titan's low latitudes is the aeolian (wind) activity. The dark, organic-rich terrains that dominate the equator are giant dune fields, which are hundreds of km long, a few km wide, and about 50-150 m in height. Strong winds occurring at the equinoxes seem to control their direction [11], but local topography and ground humidity seem to play a role too. Further
investigation of the dune morphometry and composition would help better understand Titan's meteorology and geology.

### 3.3.3 Plains

60% of the surface of Titan is covered by plains that appear uniform at the resolution of the *Cassini* radar (300 m at best). Future missions will have to unravel the mystery of these features, which likely hold important clues on the evolution of Titan's surface.

### 3.3.4 Lakes

Titan is the only other planetary body in the Solar System to possess bodies of liquid on its surface that are stable in time. *Cassini* observations of Titan have revealed three seas and ~650 polar lakes, 200 being empty and more than 300 filled or partially filled (e.g. [105, 31]). Modeling suggests the liquid composition to be a mixture of methane and ethane with the contribution of dissolved nitrogen (e.g., Sagan and Dermott, [84]). However, *Cassini* data rather suggest a dominance of the methane [62, 63]. It remains to explain the fate of ethane which is produced in abundance in the atmosphere by photochemistry. In addition, most of Titan's smaller lakes are characterised as sharp-edged depressions with raised rims and ramparts surrounding some of them (e.g. [9, 103]). The origin of both and, more generally, the formation mechanism of Titan's lakes remains unknown.

### 3.3.5 Tectonism and cryovolcanism

Titan's tectonism and cryovolcanism is still, after *Cassini*'s exploration, under debate. Features on Titan such as linear dark features, ridges, mountains, and canyons [73, 77, 65, 57] suggest tectonism [89] followed by exogenous processes. However, *Cassini* imagery is insufficient to understand the origin of the observed surface deformations (tides, crust cooling etc.).

Another surface process that has not yet been identified, but is speculated, is cryovolcanism. Outgassing by cryovolcanism has been proposed as a possible replenishment mechanism for Titan's atmospheric methane (e.g. [56]) and a number of plausible cryovolcanic landforms were proposed on the basis of their morphology (e.g. lobate flows in Sotra Patera) and/or because surface changes were observed [101]. However, there is no “smoking gun” for cryovolcanism on Titan and the idea of cryovolcanism as a possible shaping process remains controversial (e.g. [66]). Future missions will shed light on the exchanges between the interior, the surface, and the atmosphere of Titan.

### 3.3.6 Astrobiology

Titan harbors a combination of complex hydrocarbons and organic molecules in addition to a water ocean beneath its ice shell and potential cryovolcanism. Liquid water can also exist at the surface for a limited time, e.g. after an impact

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>
or a cryoeruption. All these suggest conditions potentially suitable for life as we
know it and future missions should investigate Titan's chemistry and search for
biosignatures.

**Key measurements** High spatial resolution radar and infrared spectrometer will map Titan's surface. Complete coverage will be achieved by an orbiter. Mass spectrometer will determine chemistry of Titan lakes. Sonar will determine depth of a Titan sea. Gravity measurements will characterise Titan's interior. High-resolution and high-sensitivity mass spectrometry will identify key molecules in search of biosignatures.

**Summary** Titan is arguably the most Earth-like Solar System body. Its methane cycle draws an analogy with Earth's water cycle. The abundance of organic material, water, and energy source due to potential cryovolcanism qualifies the satellite as a prime candidate for a habitable world in the Solar System.

**Key scientific questions** What are the characteristics of Titan's habitability and what potential biosignatures should we look for? What is the composition and distribution of materials on and beneath Titan's surface? What are the lakes made of? Is the interior active?

**3.4 Titan's Interaction with Saturn's Magnetosphere**

Titan's orbital radius of 20 Saturn radii places it, most of the time, within Sat-
urn's magnetosphere. Titan is therefore embedded in the rapidly rotating, mag-
netised plasma that flows at ~100 km s⁻¹, much faster than the Titan orbital speed
of ~6 km s⁻¹. As the plasma flows past and around Titan, magnetic field lines
that are 'frozen' into the moving plasma drape around the moon, thus forming
downstream lobes in which the field generally points towards Titan in one lobe,
and away in the other. The magnetic field configuration arising from this type of
interaction depends on the field and plasma conditions upstream of Titan.

Before *Cassini*, the common perception was that the upstream field would be oriented north-south, the equatorial direction of Saturn's dipole field. The *Cassini* mission, however, has shown a very different picture. Saturn's disc-like plasma sheet continuously flaps up and down past Titan, with a period close to what we believe is the true rotation period of the planet – around 10.7 h. This flapping does not come from any tilt in Saturn's magnetic equator (Saturn's internal field is almost perfectly aligned with the planet's rotational axis). Rather, it arises from a rotating wave-like pattern imposed on the sheet by rotating systems of electric currents in the magnetosphere, flowing on field lines extending ~10-15 Saturn radii. As the plasma sheet moves, the upstream field changes, being dominantly north-south when Titan is near the centre of the plasma sheet [6, 83, 96, 4].
### 3.4.1 Fossil magnetic field

Later, Achilleos et al. [1] used a model of the plasma sheet (magnetodisc) to study one fly-by in detail. They found that the magnetospheric flux tubes that flow closest to Titan may carry with them the imprint of a very different kind of upstream field compared to the imprint carried by plasma in the far-Titan space. This is because the upstream field is continually changing. This change in magnetic ‘imprint’ could become even more pronounced if the boundary of Saturn’s magnetosphere moves inward or outward past Titan, as shown in Fig. 5. When this happens (albeit relatively rarely), Titan transitions between a magnetospheric and a solar wind regime, a process first discovered by Bertucci et al. [8] in the T32 flyby of *Cassini*. At T32 closest approach (CA) to Titan, the magnetic field, remarkably, had a southward component. By contrast, the ambient solar wind magnetic field surrounding the CA interval had a northward component. The southward component near CA is consistent with the draped field that *would* have been seen, had Titan been continuously immersed in Saturn’s magnetosphere throughout the encounter. But at CA, both Titan and *Cassini* were, unambiguously, outside the magnetosphere. In fact, Titan had been there for at least ~15 min, just after spending up to three hours in the magnetosphere. Hence, the field that was imprinted on Titan’s ionosphere during its magnetospheric excursion survived there for at least 15 min. The time range of the (external) magnetic imprint on Titan was found to be ~15 min to ~3 h, hence constraining the lifetime of the imprint *fossil field* at Titan, and raising the intriguing prospect of ‘magnetic archeology’, where close flybys of Titan could potentially reveal details of ambient fields to which Titan has been exposed up to about three hours in the past.

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 5** Sketch describing how Titan’s plasma interaction depends on solar wind pressure. Under nominal solar wind conditions, Titan interacts with Saturn’s rotating magnetosphere (A). When solar wind pressure is high, Titan exits Saturn’s magnetosphere and is exposed to the solar wind (B). Figure adapted from Bertucci et al. [8]</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>
The interaction between Titan and the magnetosphere is bidirectional. While the incoming plasma and magnetic field defines many aspects of the interaction at the moon, the presence of the moon itself affects the local magnetosphere in ways that are yet not fully understood. The model of the interaction, as described by computer simulations (e.g. [98]) predicts the existence of a pair of extended Alfvén wings (standing Alfvén waves) that connect with the planet’s ionosphere. However, these wings have not yet been detected, most probably due to the limited spatial coverage of the *Cassini* flybys.

### 3.4.2 Internal magnetic field

A study of *Cassini* magnetometer data in the near-Titan environment by Wei et al. [121] demonstrated that the upper limit of a putative permanent dipole moment would be ~0.78 nT $R_{Titan}^3$, not significantly different from zero. The lack of a magnetic dynamo inside Titan is consistent with the incompletely differentiated interior suggested by *Cassini* gravity measurements [39]. The existence of an induced dipole moment, arising from the penetration of a slowly varying external field into a subsurface conducting region, remains an open question – the variation of the magnetospheric field on the ~29-year orbital timescale of Saturn, for example, may be a viable candidate for induction. Any induced dipole moment would be expected to change direction during Saturn’s equinox, at which the time average direction of the ambient magnetospheric field changes direction, due to the displacement of the mean current sheet from above to below the equator (for the equinox captured by *Cassini*). Wei et al. [122] have recently reported finding a possible reversing induced field signature through comparing pre- and post-equinox field data from *Cassini*. This suggests that further characterisations or constraints on the induced dipole at Titan are needed for finally answering the question of whether an electrically conducting region, such as an ocean, exists beneath the surface.

**Key measurements** Magnetometers will measure the fossil magnetic field of Titan and measure any induced magnetic field generated in Titan’s interior. Electric field antennas, magnetometers and plasma spectrometers will measure any potential electrodynamic coupling between Titan and Saturn.

**Summary** Titan’s interaction with Saturn is both highly dynamic and bi-directional. It is unclear whether Titan has an internally generated magnetic field.

**Key scientific questions** Is there an induced magnetic field generated in Titan’s interior that might be associated with a subsurface ocean or a weak dynamo? How exactly does Titan chemically and electrodynamically interact with Saturn’s magnetosphere?
# 4 Science themes for Enceladus

## 4.1 Enceladus’ plume

Cassini has also dramatically revolutionised our view of the small icy moon Enceladus, of ~500 km in diameter, orbiting at 4 Saturn radii. A strong plume was discovered emanating from warm ‘tiger stripe’ features on its south polar surface [24, 74, 104]. The plume of water vapour and ice grains are thought to be the long-suspected source of particles making up Saturn’s E-ring, and also the dominant source for neutrals and plasma in Saturn’s magnetosphere. *In-situ* observations here revealed primarily water vapour and trace amounts of hydrocarbon-based neutral gas [118], as well as water-group positive ions that slow, divert, and even stagnate the magnetospheric flow [111]. Directly over the plume sources, charged nanograin populations have been observed that are related to the tiger stripes but dispersed in their motion by Saturn’s magnetic field [44]. Negative water group ions, possibly with additional species consistent with hydrocarbons, are also seen.

### 4.1.1 Ongoing hydrothermal activities

Repeated Cassini sampling of Enceladus’ plume ejecta, simulations, and laboratory experiments have concluded present-day hydrothermal activity at Enceladus may resemble what is seen in the deep oceans of Earth. The detection of sodium-salt-rich ice grains emitted from the plume suggests that the grains formed as frozen droplets from a liquid reservoir that has been in contact with rocks [75]. Libration measurements and interior structure modeling are consistent with the presence of a global subsurface ocean [109, 10]. Gravity measurements suggest depths of 30-40 km and extension up to southern latitudes of about 50° [40]. These findings hint at rock-water interactions in regions surrounding the core of Enceladus resulting in chemical ‘footprints’ being preserved in the liquid and subsequently transported upwards to the near-surface plume sources, where they are eventually ejected. Furthermore, the detection of nanometer-sized silica particles indicates ongoing high-temperature (>90°C) hydrothermal reactions associated with global-scale geothermal activity [38, 90, 13]. Figure 6 is an illustration of Enceladus’ global liquid ocean between its rocky core and icy crust.

### 4.1.2 Tidal forces

The brightness of the plume of Enceladus has been shown to depend on the orbital phase of Enceladus [33]. Since Enceladus’ orbit is slightly elliptical, tidal stresses will act on the moon and the cracks in its south polar region will either be more or less open depending on the distance between Enceladus and Saturn. Hedman et al. [33] showed that the plume’s brightness is several times greater when Enceladus is around apocenter (farthest away from Saturn) than when the moon is around

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 6** Illustration of the interior of Enceladus showing a global liquid water ocean between its rocky core and icy crust. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech</figcaption></figure>

pericenter (closest to Saturn). A change in plume brightness may be caused by a change in the size distribution of the grains and not solely to their total mass.

Several studies (e.g. [88]) have shown variability in the amount of water molecules ejected from the cracks in the icy crust of Enceladus. However, the correlation between the orbital phase of Enceladus and the modulation in the ejected material has been difficult to confirm (e.g. [30]). The *Cassini* observations of the plume have raised many questions about the driving processes, the time modulations, the structure of the plume, and the dynamics of the ejected material.

The water that is ejected from the south polar region of Enceladus creates a neutral water torus around Saturn, along the orbit of the moon. Subsequently, transport, photoionization, and electron impact ionization of the neutral material creates a plasma disc at the same location. The disk has been suggested to vary with longitude [29], local time [35], season [112], and the solar cycle [36]. These asymmetries found in the plasma disc are still under investigation. A complicating factor to finding a clear modulation in the plasma disc is that the source of disc material, i.e., the Enceladus plume, is also varying.

### 4.1.3 Astrobiology

The Ion Neutral Mass Spectrometer (INMS) onboard *Cassini* sampled Enceladus' plume and found ammonia, along with various other organic compounds, deuterium, and very probably $ ^{40}Ar $ [118], as shown in Fig. 7. Since ammonia acts as an anti-freeze, its presence is strong evidence for the existence of liquid water, given that the measured temperatures exceed 180 K near the fractures from which the jets emanate [104]. Temperatures were measured by *Cassini*'s Composite Infrared Spectrometer (CIRS), which detected 3-7 GW of thermal emission from the south polar
<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 7** Composition of Enceladus’ plume as measured by Cassini’s Ion and Neutral Mass Spectrometer [118]</figcaption></figure>

troughs and confirming an internal heat source. This makes Enceladus the third known solid planetary body that is sufficiently geologically active for its internal heat to be detected by remote sensing – after Earth and Io.

INMS also detected molecular hydrogen in the plume [119]. Ongoing hydrothermal reactions of rock containing reduced minerals and organic materials have been invoked as the most plausible source of this hydrogen. Waite et al. [119] further postulated that the relatively high hydrogen abundance in the plume signals thermodynamic disequilibrium that favours the formation of methane from CO₂ in Enceladus’ ocean. This state of disequilibrium is exploited by some forms of life (chemolithotrophs) as a source of chemical energy. H₂ metabolisms are used by some of the most phylogenetically ancient forms of life on Earth [79], while on modern Earth, geochemical fuels such as H₂ support thriving ecosystems even in the absence of sunlight [45].

That said, while *Cassini* has flown through and directly sampled Enceladus’ plume, it did so with instruments that were 20 years old and with very limited capabilities. The aforementioned discoveries cannot categorically confirm evidence of biological processes. More complex and highly sensitive analyses will recognise long chain molecules and amino acids that are uniquely interesting targets in the search for life. Even more complex analyses such as identifying the chirality (left-handed vs. right-handed) of amino acids will be very instructive. Nearly all amino acids on Earth are left-handed since biological processes requires this basic consistency for proteins to fold. It is therefore expected that any protein-based life will “choose” a particular chirality, i.e. all left-handed or all right-handed, rather than an equal mixture of the two [21].

### 4.1.4 Dusty plasmas

In the plume, the exhaust from the south pole creates a different plasma regime, dusty plasma. When the ice particles from the fractures immerse into the ambient plasma, they acquire charges. The charge state of the particle varies depending on the surrounding plasma condition. In the dense plasma, as in Saturn’s inner magnetosphere, the electrical potential of the dust becomes slightly negative [46, 116], and
the grain charge number varies from single to several thousand (e.g., [37, 126]). The charged grains from Enceladus in Saturn's magnetosphere are under the influences of both gravity as well as electromagnetic forces. When the number of charged grains is large and inter-grain distance is small compared to the plasma Debye length, charged dust particles participate in the collective behavior, i.e. dusty plasma in contrast to dust-laden plasma.

A number of Enceladus flybys by *Cassini* provided direct measurements of the dust and plasma in the plume regions. The charged grains have been directly confirmed by the Cosmic Dust Analyzer (CDA; [47]), the Radio Plasma Wave Science (RPWS) antenna [49], and the plasma spectrometer (CAPS) as high energy charged particles [34]. The total charge number of the grains has been inferred by the Langmuir probe and the magnetic field measurements [67]. Combining these measurements concluded that the typical size of the outgas from the south pole are nanometers to micrometers, however, the overall negative charge in the plume is carried by the nanometer to sub-micrometer grains [23], and they are in the dusty plasma regime [67].

**Key measurements** Modern chemical spectrometers will identify long chain molecules, such as essential amino acids required for biological processes, with the capability of discriminating between left-handed and right-handed chirality. Chemical spectrometers will also identify other important compounds, relative abundances, and oxidation states that are key ingredients for biological processes. Infrared and ultraviolet spectrometers will monitor the plume gas, its activity and dust distributions. Dust analysers and plasma spectrometers (electron and ion) will measure a wide range of the size distribution of grains. Plasma spectrometers and Langmuir probes will measure electrical potential of the grains, as well as electron temperature and ion speeds. Gravity measurements will characterise Enceladus' interior.

**Summary** Enceladus has ongoing hydrothermal activity from its tidally heated interior. The plume emanates from the southern polar region and has been measured to contain water, volatiles, and organic compounds. The plume originates from a subsurface salty ocean. Altogether, the knowns of (i) an accessible salty ocean, (ii) organic compounds, (iii) energy, and (iv) hydrothermal activity make Enceladus a prime candidate to explore habitability outside the Earth's biosphere.

**Key scientific questions** Is life present in Enceladus now? What is the chemistry of its plume? How does the chemistry evolve over time? Does the chemistry contain signatures of biology?

## 4.2 Enceladus' interaction with Saturn's magnetosphere

### 4.2.1 Electric current system

The coupling between Enceladus and Saturn is in many aspects similar to the one observed near Jupiter's moon Io [70]. It includes the existence of accelerated plasma
and magnetically field-aligned electric currents, associated with Alfvén wings, pro-
ducing auroral footprints on Saturn’s atmosphere. Indeed, two striking observations
of the Enceladus auroral footprint have been reported by Pryor et al. [76] and obser-
vations of accelerated electron beams associated with plasma wave emissions [28]
and field aligned electric currents [26] have been also reported near the moon at the
edge of the plume. Figure 8 illustrates how an auroral footprint on Saturn is con-
nected to Enceladus via Saturn’s magnetic field lines.

Since the plume is located near the south pole of Enceladus, a north-south asymmetry in Enceladus’ plasma interaction and the Alfvén wing system is introduced. The south pole plume launches Alfvén waves, which are partially blocked by the solid body of Enceladus. This leads to hemispheric coupling currents along the Enceladus flux tube and associated discontinuities in the magnetic field [87, 97]. In addition to the spatial asymmetries of the interaction, the plasma interaction is also time-dependent due to the diurnal variability of Enceladus’ plume activity [88, 33].

More recently when *Cassini* sampled Saturn’s topside ionosphere, Sulaiman et al. [107] reported observations of plasma processes and strong electric currents demonstrably linked to Enceladus. The detection of such phenomena when *Cassini* was so close to Saturn underlined the nonlocality and spatial extent of the ever-present coupling between Enceladus and Saturn, thus indicating these two bodies are in continuous energy exchange between each other. The magnitude of this energy, however, remains to be quantified.

4.2.2 Space weathering

As introduced earlier, prebiotic polymers are synthesized in Titan’s atmosphere.
Such a process could also happen on Enceladus’ surface because there are source

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 8** Artist’s concept of the coupling between Enceladus and Saturn creating an auroral footprint on Saturn’s atmosphere. Credit: K. Moscati and A. Rymer; JHU/APL</figcaption></figure>
materials, e.g., ammonia and tholins, already suggested from surface reflectance at ultraviolet wavelengths [127].

Space weathering inhomogeneity potentially exists at Enceladus because it has an inhomogeneous magnetic field induced by electromagnetic interactions between Saturn's magnetosphere, Enceladus' surface, plume, and subsurface ocean (e.g., [43]).

If we successfully associate characteristics of the space weathering with the cumulative dose of irradiation, the duration of weathering can be estimated from the surface spectrum, i.e. more weathered surfaces have been irradiated for a longer time. The absolute duration of weathering, in turn, tells us the duration of the induced magnetic field that modifies the weathering. The induced magnetic field duration constrains when the interiors were molten, started pluming, and simultaneously induced the magnetic field.

**Key measurements** A magnetometer will measure the strength and direction of the electric current and Alfvén wing coupling Saturn to Enceladus, as well as measure any induced magnetic field. Plasma spectrometers will measure the beam speeds and energies associated with the coupling. Electric field antennas and magnetic search coils will constrain frequencies and powers of plasma waves that arise as a result of this interaction. Altogether the fields and particles suite will constrain the power of this coupling. A highly sensitive ultraviolet spectrometer will remotely detect the auroral footprints on Saturn's atmosphere, that have only been detected very few times by *Cassini*. *In-situ* plasma measurements will quantify incident plasma flux and composition irradiated to Enceladus' surface. Ultraviolet, visible, infrared, millimeter/micrometer wave spectra will remotely detect the distribution of space weathering activity.

**Summary** Saturn is persistently coupled to Enceladus through a large and extensive system of electric currents along Saturn's magnetic field lines. As Enceladus orbits Saturn, it traces a circle of dynamism on Saturn's northern and southern atmospheres that are magnetically conjugate to Enceladus' orbit. The combination of spatial asymmetries on Enceladus' surface and temporal variability of its plume activity means this interaction is highly non-uniform. Enceladus is prone to space weathering by incident plasma, which might be capable of synthesising organic compounds.

**Key scientific questions** What is the strength of Saturn's interaction with Enceladus? In other words, how much energy is transferred between the two bodies? How is Enceladus' surface affected by space weathering? What organic compounds are synthesized by the space weathering process at Enceladus?

## 5 Titan and Enceladus science in context

The scientific themes summarised in the previous sections are relevant to a wide range of disciplines within physics, chemistry, and biology spanning micro- (e.g. fundamental chemistry) to macro-scales (e.g. evolution). Below is a list of some
emerging and fast-growing fields that are relevant to the exploration of Titan and Enceladus.

## 5.1 Exoplanets and exomoons

The rapid growth of the exoplanetary community is reflected by multiple selected European and international missions, such as PLATO, Euclid, Ariel, JWST, etc. The exploration of Titan and Enceladus will uniquely complement these remote observations by providing an in-situ perspective to the knowledge of exoplanetary and/or exomoon composition, structure, and formation.

## 5.2 Ocean worlds and astrobiology

The topic of ocean worlds in the Solar System has witnessed a ‘boom’ in the last decade with the selection of ESA’s JUICE and NASA’s Europa Clipper missions to the Galilean moons. The potential to understand ocean worlds through the exploration of Titan and Enceladus is limitless. These moons together offer a diverse range of topics in this area that include: (i) Bodies of liquid of various sizes (e.g. lakes on Titan, ocean on Enceladus), (ii) Surface and subsurface bodies, (iii) Depletion and replenishment of bodies (e.g. lakes on Titan), (iv) Tidally heated interiors, and (v) Chemical and geological processes (e.g. rock-water interactions). Combined with JUICE and Europa Clipper findings, the exploration of Titan and Enceladus will bring strong constraints on the presence of liquid water further away from the Sun than previously supposed by the standard habitability zone models in the Solar System, and would provide essential new constraints for the search for habitable worlds outside our Solar System, in exoplanetary systems.

The recent selection of Dragonfly, a mission that will send a mobile robotic rotor-craft lander to Titan, for the NASA New Frontiers program, testifies to the interest of the international planetary science community for Saturn’s largest moon. Titan is one of the most compelling astrobiology targets in the Solar System and Dragonfly will assess its prebiotic chemistry and habitability visiting multiple locations at the surface including dunes and a young crater.

## 5.3 Atmospheres

The combination of Titan’s chemically rich atmosphere and highly variable space environment affords a vast spectrum of atmospheric dynamics, chemistry, and cloud formation phenomena that can be explored. In tandem with comparative datasets of other Solar System bodies, a large parameter space can be constructed from which exoplanet and exomoon atmospheres can be characterised.

## 5.4 Origin and evolution of the Solar System

The satellites around giant planets can offer clues of how the Solar System evolved in time. For example, the mass-distance relationship of the icy moons suggests a
possible linkage to the origin and evolution of giant planets’ ring systems [12].
Moreover, the circumstances allowing the capture of small objects into satellites do
not exist in the current stage of the Solar System. Understanding the properties of
the irregular satellites around giant planets therefore provides a unique window to
look into the past of the Solar System evolution.

**5.5 Dust in the Solar System and planetary formation**

Dust and gases are the fundamental elements for the formation of stars and planets. Recent studies consider the effects of magnetorotational instability of plasmas. However, the evolution of dusty plasma in the absence of the UV ionization at the center of the protoplanetary disc and the interactions between dust and plasma are missing links. It is postulated that dust-plasma interaction must influence the nucleation of grains as well as their subsequent agglomeration. The Enceladus plume and Titan’s atmosphere are the sites to investigate the nature of charged dust and its interaction with plasma, and may give hints to addressing questions on planetary formation mechanisms.

# 6 Titan and Enceladus missions

**6.1 Mission considerations**

**6.1.1 Payload**

The diverse scientific opportunities highlighted in Sections 3 and 4 call for a range
of instruments, most of which can participate in more than one experiment. *In-situ*
instrumentation is required for direct sampling of Titan's atmosphere and lakes,
Enceladus' plume and their interaction with Saturn's environment. Their capabili-
ties include, but are not limited to: mass spectroscopy of ions and neutrals, plasma
analysis (ions, electrons), aerosol and dust detection, electric and magnetic field
direction, frequency, and power. Multi-spectral remote sensing instrumentation is
required for the characterisation of Titan's atmosphere, as well as the surfaces and
interiors of Titan and Enceladus. These capabilities include, but are not limited to:
radar imaging and sounder, ultraviolet, visible, infrared, millimeter, and micrometer
spectroscopy and imaging, gravity radiometry, seismometer, thermal sensing. These
instruments have strong European heritage from previous, existing and upcoming
missions such as *JUICE*, *Cassini-Huygens*, *Rosetta*, *BepiColombo*, etc.

**6.1.2 Planetary protection**

Titan and Enceladus hold the likelihood of hosting biosignatures, thus making plan-
etary protection considerations necessary. Fortunately, collecting samples from
Enceladus' plume means possible biosignatures originating from the moon's inte-
rior can be obtained without penetrating the surface. This greatly mitigates risks
associated with planetary protection, as well as mission complexities and costs in general. For this reason, we argue that Enceladus poses the least risk for the search for biosignatures in the outer Solar System.

### 6.1.3 Radiation

Saturn has relatively weak radiation belts, thus making radiation considerations manageable. The outermost edge of the main radiation belt is situated at 3.5 Saturn radii, which is planetward of Enceladus’ orbit (4 Saturn radii) and Titan’s orbit (20 Saturn radii).

## 6.2 Architectures

### 6.2.1 L-class or M-class (Titan and Enceladus orbiter; bioinspiration and biomimetrics)

An orbiter with a probe/lander would cover all the identified scientific goals. This will ensure the spatial coverage required to fully map the surfaces of the satellites and characterise their interiors using gravity and induction measurements. A Titan orbiter would also serve as a communication link between Earth and a probe/lander on the ground or lake. Titan has a relatively large mass and is far enough away from Saturn to impose a reasonable $\Delta V$ cost. Enceladus, on the other hand, possesses a very low mass (0.8% Titan’s mass) and orbits deep within Saturn’s gravity well thus demanding an orbit insertion $\Delta V$ that is prohibitively large. Efficient tour designs have been explored such as a leveraging tour with Titan, Rhea, Dione, and Tethys to reach Enceladus orbit. This was found to require less than half of the $\Delta V$ of a direct Titan-Enceladus transfer [106]. Free-return cycler trajectories are also possible, where a spacecraft shuttles between Enceladus and Titan using little or no fuel [82].

Numerous diverse Titan missions have been proposed in the last decade [81, 72, 5]. A mission to the Titan-Enceladus system, *TandEM*, has been extensively studied as an L-class mission by Coustenis et al. [19], where they explored the possibilities of a hot air balloon (Titan), mini-probes (Titan), and penetrators (Titan and Enceladus). In June 2019, *Dragonfly* was selected as NASA’s next New Frontiers mission. The mission will send a robotic rotorcraft lander to Titan in order to explore prebiotic chemistry and habitability. Such heavier-than-air flight is made possible by Titan’s thicker atmosphere (1.5x that of the Earth’s) and smaller gravitational acceleration.

A recent concept of a versatile aerial-aquatic robotic aircraft provides the capability of *in-situ* near-surface atmosphere and surface liquid observations [64]. The operation has heritage in robotic work inspired by observations of the natural world – the field of bioinspiration and biomimetrics. A ‘plunge diving’ manoeuvre, inspired by the gannet seabird [54], involves the aircraft plunging nose-first into the surface of Titan’s lake. The vehicle is capable of relaunching and ejecting a mass of liquid collected from the area of launch, as shown in Fig. 9 [95]. Through this, measurements of the compositions of Titan’s lakes and near-surface atmosphere can
<figure><img src="image_18.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 9** Impression of a 'plunge diving' manoeuvre by an aerial-aquatic aircraft inspired by the gannet seabird (inset). Inset adapted from Liang et al. [54]</figcaption></figure>

be achieved. Entry and descent data can also be used to perform upper and mid-atmospheric observations, in a similar way to the *Huygens* descent.

A Saturn orbiter with multiple satellite flybys would also provide significant scientific return on the aforementioned themes. The Saturn orbiter would have state-of-the-art payload that exclusively performs satellite science.

### 6.2.2 S-class or F-class (Plume flyby)

A flyby mission could provide significant scientific return, however this would focus on a single theme, namely habitability. A spacecraft with focused payload would fly through Enceladus' plume and conduct ultra-high resolution and sensitivity measurements of its composition in search for biosignatures.

## 6.3 Enabling technology

### 6.3.1 Radioactive power sources

Electrical power sources for outer planet missions are a key enabling technology. Electrical power and spacecraft heating are issues for any mission beyond the orbit of Jupiter due to the low solar irradiance at such distances. This is further complicated by the decrease in solar panel efficiency at low intensities (LILT). To supply sufficient, long-term, and uninterrupted power, solar panels of an unfeasibly large area would be required. This makes both Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) and Radioisotope Heating Units (RHUs) necessary to power and heat the spacecraft, respectively. Within Europe, $^{241}$AM is favoured over $^{238}$Pu as a source of radioisotopes. Despite $^{241}$AM having a lower power density that that of $^{238}$Pu, its longer half-life and more cost-effective production makes it the economical alternative. A mission to explore Titan and Enceladus would greatly benefit from an independent European power source.
### 6.3.2 Electromagnetic cleanliness

EMC issues should be explored to satisfy requirements imposed by some of the listed payload elements on the spacecraft, e.g. plasma packages and magnetometers. This would be especially crucial to resolve any induced and fossil magnetic fields that may be found on Titan.

### 6.3.3 Telecommunications

Given the range of the proposed target, science data return will be limited by bandwidth. Most deep space missions use X-band links, while few also use Ka-band, to transmit telemetry. Nowadays, NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN) 70-m radio antennas provide the maximum rates. Since *Cassini* relied on NASA’s DSN, a mission to Titan and Enceladus would therefore require similar capabilities to achieve the minimum science data return. Further studies of new or upgraded telecommunications technologies are welcomed. This includes both Earth-direct and intra-spacecraft (i.e. relay between probe and spacecraft) communications.

### 6.3.4 Autonomous guidance, navigation and control

Autonomous GN&C systems are required whenever position and attitude must be known precisely and updated quickly. Proximity missions, particularly small body proximity, will require onboard autonomous GN&C to detect and avoid surface hazards and especially to minimise planetary protection risks. This technology more broadly applies to flyby, small body rendezvous and orbiting, landing, atmospheric entry, and “touch and go” sampling, for example to cope with severe and unpredictable contact forces and torques.

### 6.3.5 Mass spectrometry and dust analysis

The surprise discovery of Enceladus’ plume by Cassini meant the mass spectrometer and dust analyser onboard were not specifically designed for such measurements. The composition of the plume was determined using a low resolution mass spectrometer. A more detailed analysis of the plume in search for complex biosignatures would require a mass spectrometer with higher capability of measuring masses up to 1000 u, with a high resolution exceeding 24,000 m/Δm and a high sensitivity of one part per trillion. The state-of-the-art mass spectrometer should not only be capable of identifying complex organic chains, but also differentiating their chirality. Similarly, the dust and ice analysers should have higher capabilities, resolution and sensitivity to pick up individual ice and dust grains with micron and sub-micron diameters. These requirements have been studied in detail by the Enceladus Life Finder team [60].
# 7 Summary and perspectives

This White Paper briefly describes outstanding questions pertaining to Titan and Enceladus - legacies of the successful *Cassini-Huygens* mission. We make the case that such questions are not merely specific to these two mysterious systems but have much broader and deeper implications for humankind’s outstanding questions at large of habitability in the Solar System. For these reasons, we recommend the acknowledgement of Titan and Enceladus as priorities for ESA’s *Voyage 2050 programme* and to combine efforts, in science and technology, with international agencies to launch a dedicated mission to either or both targets, much like ESA’s key involvement in some of the most successful planetary missions like *Cassini-Huygens*.

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

## References

1. Achilleos, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. 41 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061747

2. Ågren, et al.: Ann. Geophys. 25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2359-2007

3. Anderson, et al.: Space Sci. Rev. 214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0559-5

4. Arridge, et al.: Space Sci. Rev. 162 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9849-x

5. Barnes, et al.: Exp. Astron. 33 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-011-9275-9

6. Bertucci, et al.: Planet. Space Sci. 57 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2009.02.009

7. Bertucci, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. 42 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062106

8. Bertucci, et al.: The magnetic memory of Titan’s ionized atmosphere. Science 321 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159780

9. Birch, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. 46 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078099

10. Cadek, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068634

11. Charnay, et al.: Nat. Geosci. 8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2406

12. Charnoz, et al.: Nature 465 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09096

13. Choblet, et al.: Nat. Astron (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0289-8

14. Coates, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030978

15. Coates, et al.: Planet. Space Sci. 57 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2009.05.009

16. Coates, et al.: Space Sci. Rev. 162 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9826-4

17. Coates, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. 117 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017595

18. Coustenis, et al.: Icarus 177 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2005.03.012

19. Coustenis, et al.: Exp. Astron. 23 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-008-9103-z

20. Cravens, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025575

21. Creamer, et al.: Anal. Chem. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04338

22. Desai, et al.: Astrophys. J. Lett. 844 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa7851

23. Dong, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. 120 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020288
24. Dougherty, et al.: Science **311** (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120985

25. Elachi, et al.: Science **308** (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1109919

26. Engelhardt, et al.: Planet. Space Sci. **117** (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2015.09.010

27. Gombosi, et al.: Astron. Astrophys. **583** (2015). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526316

28. Gurnett, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. **38** (2011). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL046854

29. Gurnett, et al.: Science **316** (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138562

30. Hansen, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. **44** (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071853

31. Hayes, et al.: Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. **44** (2016). https://doi.org/10.1146/annur ev-earth-060115-012247

32. Hayes, et al.: Nat. Geosci. **11** (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0103-y

33. Hedman, et al.: Nature **500** (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12371

34. Hill, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. **117** (2012). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017218

35. Holmberg, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060229

36. Holmberg, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. **122** (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024311

37. Horanyi, et al.: **97** (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(92)90131-P

38. Hsu, et al.: Nature **519** (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14262

39. Iess, et al.: Science **327** (2010). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182583

40. Iess, et al.: Science **344** (2014). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250551

41. Janssen, et al.: Icarus **270** (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.09.027

42. Jaumann, et al.: Saturn from Cassini-Huygens. In: Dougherty, M.K., Esposito, L.W., Krimigis, S.M. (eds.) p. 637–681, Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

43. Jia, et al.: Space Sci. Rev. **152** (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-009-9507-8

44. Jones, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. **36** (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038284

45. Kelley, et al.: Nature **412** (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35084000

46. Kempf, et al.: Planet. Space Sci. **54** (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2006.05.012

47. Kempf, et al.: Planet. Space Sci. **56** (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2007.11.022

48. Kliore, et al.: J. Geophys. Space **116** (2011). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016694

49. Kurth, et al.: Planet. Space Sci. **54** (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2006.05011

50. Lavvas, et al.: Icarus **213** (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.03.001

51. Lavvas, et al.: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. **110** (2013). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217059110

52. Lebreton, et al.: Nature **438** (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04347

53. Le Gall, et al.: Icarus **207** (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.12.027

54. Liang, et al.: J. Bionic. Eng. **10** (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(13)60224-3

55. Lindgren, et al.: Icarus **291** (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.12.013

56. Lopes, et al.: Icarus **186** (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2006.09.006

57. Lopes, et al.: Icarus **205** (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.08.010

58. Lopes, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. **118** (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/jgre.20062

59. Lopes, et al.: Icarus **270** (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.11.034

60. Lunine, et al.: Enceladus life finder: the search for life in a habitable moon. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (2015)

61. Malaska, et al.: Icarus **270**, 130–161 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.02.021

62. Mastrogiuseppe, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. **41** (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058618

63. Mastrogiuseppe, et al.: Icarus **300** (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2017.09.009

64. McKevitt: 'ASTRAEUS: An aerial-aquatic mission to Titan', British Interplanetary Society Re inventing Space 2021. London, 28-30 June. British Interplanetary Society, London (2021)

65. Mitri, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. **115** (2010). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JE003592

66. Moore and Pappalardo: Titan: An exogenic world? Icarus **212** (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. icarus.2011.01.019

67. Morooka, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. **116** (2011). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017038

68. Morooka, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. **124** (2019). https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026154

69. Neish and Lorenz: Planet. Space Sci. **60** (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2011.02.016

70. Neubauer: J. Geophys. Res. **85** (1980). https://doi.org/10.1029/JA085iA03p0117

71. Niemann: Nature **438** (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04122

72. Oleson, et al.: AIAA SPACE Forum (2015). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-4445

73. Porco, et al.: Nature **434** (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03436

74. Porco, et al.: Science **311** (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123013

75. Postberg, et al.: Nature **459** (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08046

76. Pryor, et al.: Nature **472** (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09928
77. Radebaugh, et al.: Icarus **192** (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2007.06.020

78. Radebaugh, et al.: Icarus **194** (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2007.10.015

79. Raymann, et al.: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. **112** (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420858112

80. Regoli, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. **121** (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022617

81. Reh, et al.: IEEE Aerospace conference, 2009, pp. 1-8 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2009.4839316

82. Russell, Strange: J. Guid. Control Dyn. **32** (2012). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36610

83. Rymer, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. **36** (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039427

84. Sagan, Dermott: Nature **300** (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/300731a0

85. Sagan, Khare: Nature **277** (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/277102a0

86. Sagan, et al.: Astrophys. J. **414** (1993). https://doi.org/10.1086/173086

87. Saur, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. **112** (2007). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012479

88. Saur, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. **35** (2008). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035811

89. Scheidegger: Morphotectonics. Springer, Berlin (2004)

90. Sekine, et al.: Nat. Commun. **6** (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9604

91. Shebanits, et al.: Planet Space Sci. **84** (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2013.05.021

92. Shebanits, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. **122** (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA023987

93. Shebanits, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. **121** (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022980

94. Shukla, P.K.: Phys. Plasmas **8** (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1343087

95. Siddall, Kovac: Bioinspir. Biomim. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/9/3/031001

96. Simon, et al.: Planet. Space Sci. **58** (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2010.04.021

97. Simon, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. **41** (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060081

98. Simon, et al.: Phys. Rep. **602** (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.09.005

99. Sittler, et al.: In: Brown, R.H., Lebreton, J.P., Waite, J.H., et al. (eds.) Titan from Cassini-Huygens. Springer, Dordrech (2009)

100. Smith, et al.: Science **212** (1981). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.212.4491.163

101. Solomonidou, et al.: Icarus **270** (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.05.003

102. Solomonidou, et al.: J. Geophys. Res. **123** (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JE005477

103. Solomonidou, et al.: Icarus, in press (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.05.040

104. Spencer, et al.: Science **311** (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121661

105. Stofan, et al.: Nature **445** (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05438

106. Strange, et al.: Adv. Astronaut. Sci. **135**(2), 919-934 (2009)

107. Sulaiman, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. **45** (2018). https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078130

108. Teanby, et al.: Icarus **181** (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2005.11.008

109. Thomas, et al.: Icarus **264** (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.037

110. Tian, et al.: Science **308** (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106983

111. Tokar, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. **36** (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038923

112. Tseng, et al.: Icarus **206** (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.05.019

113. Tucker, Johnson: Planet. Space Sci. **57** (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2009.06.003

114. Vuitton, et al.: Planet. Space Sci. **57** (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2009.04.004

115. Wahlund, et al.: Science **308** (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1109807

116. Wahlund, et al.: Planet. Space Sci. **57** (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2009.03.011

117. Waite, et al.: Science **316** (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139727

118. Waite, et al.: Nature **460** (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08153

119. Waite, et al.: Science **356** (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8703

120. Wei, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. **36** (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041048

121. Wei, et al.: Upper limits on Titan's magnetic moment and implications for its interior. J. Geophys. Res. **115** (2010). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JE003538

122. Wei, et al.: In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, vol. 20 of EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, p. 2639 (2018)

123. Wellbrock, et al.: Geophys. Res. Lett. **40** (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50751

124. Wood, et al.: Icarus **206** (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.08.021

125. Yaroshenko, Lühr: Icarus **278** (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.05.033

126. Yaroshenko, et al.: Planet. Space Sci. **57** (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2009.03.002

127. Zastrow, et al.: Icarus **220** (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2012.04.002
**Publisher's Note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Authors and Affiliations

Ali H. Sulaiman¹ · Nicholas Achilleos² ID · Cesar Bertucci³ · Andrew Coates⁴,⁵ ·

Michele Dougherty⁶ · Lina Hadid⁷ · Mika Holmberg⁸ · Hsiang-Wen Hsu⁹ ·

Tomoki Kimura¹⁰ · William Kurth¹ · Alice Le Gall¹¹ · James McKevitt⁴,¹² ·

Michiko Morooka¹³ · Go Murakami¹⁴ · Leonardo Regoli¹⁵ · Elias Roussos¹⁶ ·

Joachim Saur¹⁷ · Oleg Shebanits¹⁴ · Anezina Solomonidou¹⁸ ·

Jan-Erik Wahlund¹³ · J. Hunter Waite¹⁹

¹ University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA

² University College London, London, UK

³ Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

⁴ Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Dorking, UK

⁵ Centre for Planetary Sciences at UCL/Birkbeck, London, UK

⁶ Imperial College London, London, UK

⁷ LPP, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France

⁸ Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, Toulouse, France

⁹ University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

¹⁰ Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan

¹¹ LATMOS, Université Versailles Saint Quentin, Versailles, France

¹² University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

¹³ Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden

¹⁴ Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Tokyo, Japan

¹⁵ Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA

¹⁶ Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Göttingen, Germany

¹⁷ University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

¹⁸ California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

¹⁹ Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA