# Shigella sonnei utilises colicins during inter-bacterial competition

P. Leung, X. Matanza, B. Roche, K. Ha, H. Cheung, S. Appleyard, T. Collins, O. Flanagan, B. Marteyn, A. Clements

► To cite this version:

P. Leung, X. Matanza, B. Roche, K. Ha, H. Cheung, et al., Shigella sonnei utilises colicins during inter-bacterial competition. Microbiology, 2024, 170 (2), 10.1099/mic.0.001434. hal-04772330

HAL Id: hal-04772330

https://hal.science/hal-04772330v1

Submitted on 12 Nov 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# *Shigella sonnei* utilises colicins during inter-bacterial competition

P. B. Leung¹, X. M. Matanza¹, B. Roche², K. P. Ha¹, H. C. Cheung¹, S. Appleyard¹, T. Collins¹, O. Flanagan¹, B. S. Marteyn²,³,⁴
and A. Clements¹,*

## Abstract

The mammalian colon is one of the most densely populated habitats currently recognised, with 10¹¹–10¹³ commensal bacteria per gram of colonic contents. Enteric pathogens must compete with the resident intestinal microbiota to cause infection. Among these enteric pathogens are *Shigella* species which cause approximately 125 million infections annually, of which over 90% are caused by *Shigella flexneri* and *Shigella sonnei*. *Shigella sonnei* was previously reported to use a Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) to outcompete *E. coli* and *S. flexneri* in *in vitro* and *in vivo* experiments. *S. sonnei* strains have also been reported to harbour colicinogenic plasmids, which are an alternative anti-bacterial mechanism that could provide a competitive advantage against the intestinal microbiota. We sought to determine the contribution of both T6SS and colicins to the anti-bacterial killing activity of *S. sonnei*. We reveal that whilst the T6SS operon is present in *S. sonnei*, there is evidence of functional degradation of the system through SNPs, indels and IS within key components of the system. We created strains with synthetically inducible T6SS operons but were still unable to demonstrate anti-bacterial activity of the T6SS. We demonstrate that the anti-bacterial activity observed in our *in vitro* assays was due to colicin activity. We show that *S. sonnei* no longer displayed anti-bacterial activity against bacteria that were resistant to colicins, and removal of the colicin plasmid from *S. sonnei* abrogated anti-bacterial activity of *S. sonnei*. We propose that the anti-bacterial activity demonstrated by colicins may be sufficient for niche competition by *S. sonnei* within the gastrointestinal environment.

## INTRODUCTION

*Shigella* is a major causative agent of bacterial dysentery (shigellosis). It remains a major cause of infant morbidity and mortality for children under the age of five, especially in resource-limited nations [1]. In resource-rich nations, *Shigella* has become an emerging pathogen of concern due to extensive and expanding resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobial drugs [2–9]. *Shigella* is spread via the faecal-oral route, most commonly through contaminated food and water sources but also via fomites. *Shigella* is thought to be a successful human-adapted pathogen due to its low infectious dose required to start an infection: this is estimated to be between 10 and 500 colony-forming units (CFUs) [10]. *Shigella* is not known to have animal or environmental reservoirs unlike many other human enteric pathogens.

The genus *Shigella* is composed of four species: *S. boydii*, *S. dysenteriae*, *S. flexneri* and *S. sonnei*. All four species have their own characteristics and epidemiology [11, 12]. The majority of contemporary cases are caused by *S. flexneri* and *S. sonnei*. These two species account for over 90% of all shigellosis cases [13]. However, an interesting pattern has emerged where the infection ratio of these two species is inversed in middle-high income countries (low *S. flexneri*: high *S. sonnei*) when compared to low-income countries (high *S. flexneri*: low *S. sonnei*). Therefore, as a country undergoes economic improvements, *S. sonnei* displaces *S. flexneri* as the primary causative agent of shigellosis [1, 8, 14, 15]. Several theories have emerged as to why this shift occurs, with one theory focusing on how *S. sonnei* interacts with competitors within a polymicrobial environment.

Received 11 December 2023; Accepted 25 January 2024; Published 20 February 2024

**Author affiliations:** ¹Department of Life Sciences, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, UK; ²Université de Strasbourg, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS UPR9002, F-67000 Strasbourg, France; ³University of Strasbourg Institute for Advanced Study (USIAS), F-67000 Strasbourg, France; ⁴Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Inserm U1225, Unité de Pathogenèse des Infections Vasculaires, F-75015 Paris, France.

*Correspondence: A. Clements, a.clements@imperial.ac.uk

Keywords: anti-bacterial activity; colicins; Interbacterial competition; polymicrobial; Shigella; T6SS.

Abbreviations: BtuB, Vitamin B12 Receptor; CFU, Colony Forming Unit; CRP, Catabolite Repressor Protein; H-NS, Histone-like Nucleoid Structuring; IPTG, Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside; LA, Lysogeny Agar; MS, Mass Spectrometry; MW, Molecular Weight; TSA, Tryptone Soy Agar; T6SS, Type 6 Secretion System; WT, Wild Type.

001434 © 2024 The Authors

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author's institution.
Whilst there are a number of differences between *S. sonnei* and *S. flexneri* [16], in the context of anti-bacterial activity, one of the key distinctions is the presence of a Type VI Secretion System (T6SS). A T6SS has been identified in *S. sonnei* but only remnants remain in *S. flexneri* (16). In one clinical isolate it has been demonstrated that this T6SS plays a key role in outcompeting *S. flexneri* during infection or in polymicrobial environments thus allowing *S. sonnei* to gain a competitive advantage [17].

The T6SS is a proteinaceous molecular machinery that is capable of delivering effector proteins directly to adjacent cells, both to the host and other microbes [18]. The T6SS has been found in approximately 25% of all Gram-negative bacteria [19]. It is one of many mechanisms that allow bacteria to gain a competitive advantage within complex polymicrobial communities where habitat and resources are limited. Recent discoveries have shown that the T6SS is capable of mediating interbacterial interactions [18, 20], targeting host cells during infection [21, 22], targeting eukaryotic competitors such as yeast [23] and even to play a role in the scavenging of metal ions [24].

The assembly and multi-protein structure of the T6SS is well conserved across the Proteobacteria, but there are large variations in their regulation [20, 25–27] and effector repertoire [28, 29]. The minimum functionality of the T6SS requires 13 sub-units (TssA-TssM), which are sometimes referred to as the core T6SS genes [30, 31]. Secreted T6SS effector proteins are genetically encoded with cognate immunity proteins which prevent self-intoxication and toxicity to kin-bacteria [28, 29, 32]. A recent study investigating the anti-bacterial activity of *S. sonnei* using bacterial genome wide association studies combined with high throughput phenotyping indicated that the ability of *S. sonnei* to kill *E. coli* had no association with the T6SS [33].

An additional anti-bacterial mechanism common to *S. sonnei* but not *S. flexneri* is the expression of E-class colicins from a small multi-copy plasmid, spB. Colicins were named due to their first characterisation in *E. coli*, with later discoveries classifying colicins into sub-groups based on their import mechanism [34]. Further advances into bacterial-secreted compounds revealed that many other species of bacteria also encoded their own versions of colicins, collectively named bacteriocins. Colicins generally have a narrow target range due to target receptor specificity [34, 35], with E-class colicins utilising the vitamin B-12 receptor (BtuB) for uptake into target cells. Genetically, colicins are usually encoded on plasmids, with E-class colicins encoded on small high-copy number plasmids. These colicinogenic plasmids encode for the colicin, cognate immunity gene and colicin lysis protein. The majority of E-class colicins are nucleases except for colicin E1 which has a pore-forming active domain [34]. Colicin immunity proteins are produced to prevent self-intoxication and toxicity to sister bacteria. Unlike the T6SS, colicins are a collective anti-bacterial mechanism as they do not benefit the producer but rather cells of the same genotype.

In this study, we investigated the contribution of the anti-bacterial activity of a contemporary clinical isolate of *S. sonnei* (SS381) alongside a *S. sonnei* isolate (CIP106347) that was previously demonstrated to exhibit T6SS-mediated anti-bacterial activity [17]. In our experiments the anti-bacterial activity was derived from the carriage of E-class colicins encoded on the plasmid, spB, rather than from the T6SS. We also provide evidence that the *S. sonnei* T6SS is in the process of functional degradation with multiple mutations inactivating key components.

## RESULTS

### *S. sonnei* has potent anti-bacterial activity in vitro against *E. coli* that is not due to T6SS activity

To investigate the contribution of the *S. sonnei* T6SS during competition with competitor bacteria, two representative isolates of *S. sonnei* were competed against *E. coli*, *S. typhimurium* or *K. pneumoniae*. T6SS competition assays were conducted on agar plates to ensure bacteria were in physical contact with each other as the T6SS is a contact-dependent secretion system. Isogenic *S. sonnei* T6SS-defective mutants were made by deleting a core component of the T6SS, Δ*tssF*. Both wild-type *S. sonnei* strains displayed potent anti-bacterial activity against *E. coli* ((Fig. 1a, b) but not against *S. typhimurium* (Fig. 1c) or *K. pneumoniae* (Fig. 1d). Unexpectedly, the T6SS mutants (ΔT6) for both *S. sonnei* strains displayed no statistically significant difference compared to the wild-type strains in their ability to inhibit the growth of *E. coli* (Fig. 1a, b). This suggests that the anti-bacterial activity measured in these assays is not due to T6SS activity.

As not all T6SS have anti-bacterial activity, Hcp secretion was also measured. Hcp forms the tube of the T6SS and is released into the extracellular milieu during active T6SS secretion [36]. Two genes encoding Hcp were identified within the *S. sonnei* T6SS operons and both were cloned and expressed as IPTG-inducible HA-fusion proteins. Secreted (supernatant) and non-secreted (cellular) fractions were separated and probed by immunoblot for Hcp presence. Hcp1 and Hcp2 HA-fusion proteins were detected in the cellular fractions for both wild-type and Δ*tssF* strains upon induction with IPTG (Fig. 1e, f). However, there was no detection of Hcp HA-fusion proteins in any of the supernatant fractions indicating a lack of T6SS secretion activity. DnaK was used as a control to demonstrate there was no contamination of cytoplasmic proteins in the supernatant fraction.
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1.** *S. sonnei* has potent anti-bacterial activity against *E. coli* but not *S. typhimurium* or *K. pneumoniae*. (a and b) Competition assays of *S. sonnei* and *E. coli* were conducted to assess the anti-bacterial activity of *S. sonnei*. Two representative isolates a) SS381 and b) CIP106347 and their isogenic T6SS mutants were competed against *E. coli* BZB1011-Km (a) or *E. coli* BZB1011 (b). The two *S. sonnei* isolates were also competed against c) *S. typhimurium* SL1344 d) and *K. pneumoniae* 43816. The amount of *E. coli*, *S. typhimurium* and *K. pneumoniae* remaining after a competition with *S. sonnei* was enumerated to measure the anti-bacterial activity of *S. sonnei*. Each graph represents the mean±SEM of at least three biological replicates. A one-way ANOVA with Tukey's correction was applied. \*\*\*\* = *p*<0.00001, *ns*=non-significant. LOD=Limit of detection. (e and f) Inducible Hcp1 and Hcp2 with C-terminal HA fusions were expressed from plasmids in (e) SS381 and (f) SS381ΔT6. Following Hcp induction, bacteria were centrifuged to separate the secreted fraction (supernatant) and the cellular fraction. Proteins were then separated by SDS-PAGE. The cytoplasmic protein DnaK was used as a loading control for the cellular fraction. Hcp-HA fusion proteins were detected in all induced cellular fractions but not the supernatant fractions.</figcaption></figure>

**Contemporary *S. sonnei* have acquired mutations within the T6SS and are therefore non-functional T6SS**

Given the recent study indicating the ability of *S. sonnei* to kill *E. coli* had no association with the T6SS [33], we decided to investigate the T6SS in more detail. The T6SS gene clusters from a selection of strains were identified and compared: EHEC EDL933 which contains a T6SS closely related to *S. sonnei* [18] that has been demonstrated to be functional [21], *S. sonnei* 53G (a well-studied isolate of lineage two), SS381 and CIP106347 as the representative isolates from lineage three (Fig. 2a). This analysis illustrated that the *S. sonnei* T6SS is analogous to the EHEC EDL933 T6SS as predicted through sequence homology. However, a more detailed analysis revealed that several T6SS core genes in *S. sonnei* appear to be non-functional when translated (ORFs coloured in red, Fig. 2a). This is due to indels leading to a frameshift and premature stop codon, or the presence of an insertion sequence in the case of *tssM* for SS381 and CIP106347. We then searched SS381 and CIP106347 genomes for paralogs of TssM, TssA2, TssH (ClpV), TssK and TssC. TssH from SS381 and CIP106347 have 33.64% and 35.04% homology respectively to the ClpB ATPase. *Francisella tularensis* has been reported to use ClpB instead of TssH for a functional, but atypical T6SS [37] and
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2.** An *in silico* analysis of the T6SS cluster across three isolates of *S. sonnei* reveal mutations within the T6SS operon. (a) The T6SS operons were identified and aligned using BlastN and visualised in EasyFig. The reference genome in this synteny analysis was the T6SS operon from EHEC EDL933. Nucleotide percentage identity is denoted by the strength of the orange shading as indicated by the legend in the bottom right. EHEC EDL933 has a T6SS operon that is very similar to the published *S. sonnei* T6SS operon and has been shown to be functionally active. Core genes are labelled for EDL933 and *S. sonnei* 53G. Genes predicted to be non-functional are denoted in red. Genes of unknown function or unable to be annotated are coloured in black. Insertion sequence elements or transposons are coloured in purple. TssC is annotated as TssC1 (182 bp) and 2 (296 bp). (b) *In silico* analysis of 20 *S. sonnei* T6SS clusters reveal predicted non-functional proteins in red and predicted functional proteins in grey. The strain name is labelled on the left of the graph and the genotype of each isolate is indicated on the right of the graph. The non-functional status of TssM is acquired through different mutations; 53G, AR0426, KCCM 41282 have a point mutation leading to a premature stop codon while all others have an IS integrated. (c) A graphical representation of the *S. sonnei* T6SS with predicted non-functional components highlighted in bold.</figcaption></figure>

therefore we cannot rule out that TssH can be complemented by ClpB in these *S. sonnei* strains. No paralogs were identified for TssM, TssA2, TssK or TssC.

To investigate the predicted functionality of the T6SS further, a larger set of *S. sonnei* WGS were extracted from the NCBI database to examine their T6SS locus. This collection of 23 additional *S. sonnei* isolates (accession numbers available in Table 1) was examined to investigate the prevalence and variety of functional and non-functional T6SS core components. The analysis showed that among the *S. sonnei* isolates, the T6SS core components; TssM, TssH, TssK and TssC were routinely predicted to be non-functional. A summary heatmap is shown in Fig. 2b. Of note, lineage two *S. sonnei* isolates 53G, AR0030, AR0426 and KCCM 41282 have a single TssM which is predicted non-functional by the presence of an internal stop codon. Lineage three isolates in this dataset have a TssM which is predicted non-functional due to an insertion sequence in the gene, annotated as TssM1 and 2. This genomic data provides further evidence that the *S. sonnei* T6SS may not be active due to mutations within multiple core components as illustrated in Fig. 2c.
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Bacterial accession numbers used in *in silico* analysis</caption><thead><tr><th>Strain name</th><th>Accession no.</th><th>S. sonnei genotype [49]</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>EHEC EDL933</td><td>NC_002655.2</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei SRR7274801</td><td>SRR7274801</td><td>1.5.3</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei SRR7209033</td><td>SRR7209033</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei AR-0030</td><td>NZ_CP032523.1</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei AR-0426</td><td>NZ_CP044151.1</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei KCCM 41282</td><td>NZ_CP041511</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei 53G</td><td>HE616528.1</td><td>2.8.2</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei H140500074 (SS074)</td><td>SRR5034528</td><td>2.11.4</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei ERR316286</td><td>ERR316286</td><td>5.1.1</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei ERR1009136</td><td>ERR1009136</td><td>5.1.4</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei 866</td><td>NZ_CP022672.1</td><td>3.1.1</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei 75/02</td><td>NZ_CP019689.1</td><td>3.1.1</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei SRR1033691</td><td>SRR1033691</td><td>3.4.1</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei ERR316239</td><td>ERR316239</td><td>3.4.3</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei H141240641 (SS641)</td><td>SRR5034532</td><td>3.6.0</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei H140860381 (SS381)</td><td>SRR10996750</td><td>3.6.1.1</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei FC1428</td><td>NZ_CP041322.1</td><td>3.6.1.1</td></tr><tr><td>AUSMDU00008333</td><td>NZLR213458.1</td><td>3.6.1.1.2</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei CIP106347</td><td>GCF_025908455.1 [33]</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei 2015C-3566</td><td>NZ_CP022457.1</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei H140460474 (SS474)</td><td>SRR5034518</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei 2015AM-1099</td><td>NZ_CP021144.1</td><td>3.7.18</td></tr><tr><td>FDAARGOS_715</td><td>NZ_CP046286.1</td><td>3.7.18</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei H144900595 (SS595)</td><td>SRR4195720</td><td>3.7.25</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei H144260580 (SS580)</td><td>SRR4195771</td><td>3.7.25</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei SS046</td><td>NC_007384.1</td><td>3.7.6</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei FORC_011</td><td>NZ_CP010829.1</td><td>3.7.6</td></tr></tbody></table>

## The S. sonnei T6SS is transcribed *in vitro*

Despite the mutations observed within components of the T6SS it is still possible the T6SS remains functional but has not been activated in our *in vitro* conditions. T6SS activity is often tightly regulated at a transcriptional level [26], we therefore investigated the region between the two operons in more detail. *In silico* prediction of this region indicated two predicted promoters controlling transcription of both operons with potential H-NS and CRP binding sites (Fig. 3a). The closest homolog of the *S. sonnei* T6SS operon in EHEC EDL933 was experimentally validated to be regulated by H-NS [21].

We used qRT-PCR to determine whether the T6SS operons were transcribed *in vitro* (Fig. 3b-g). We observed expression for all the genes tested (*tssB*, *tssH* and *tssA1* from operon 1 and *hcp2* from operon 2). We used two additional genes to compare the expression level: *rpoS* for high and *aat* for low expression respectively [38, 39]. This indicated that there was expression, albeit at a low level for both operons.

To determine if the level of transcription could be increased under different conditions, we constructed fluorescent T6SS reporter plasmids using the promoter regions of both operons to drive GFP expression. The OmpA promoter region was used as a control [40]. These three constructs were then tested in conditions that should relieve H-NS or CRP repression (temperature and glucose availability, respectively) or mimic T6SS attack (polymyxin B treatment) [41] (Fig. 3h-k). However, we
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3.** The *S. sonnei* T6SS is expressed at very low levels when under the control of its native promoters. (a) *In silico* analysis of the T6SS operon in *S. sonnei* reveals a bi-directional regulatory region. For both promoters the predicted transcriptional start sites (TSS) is indicated with an arrow. Putative binding sites for transcriptional regulators, H-NS and CRP identified by BProm are also indicated. (b-e) qRT-PCR was performed to determine the expression level of genes within both operons. Relative gene expression was determined by normalisation to *rhoB* as the bacterial house-keeping gene. Expression of (b) *tssB*, (c) *tssH* and (d) *tssA1* from T6SS operon 1 and (e) *hcp2* from T6SS operon 2 were quantified. For comparison highly expressed *rpoS* (f) and the lowly expressed *aat* (g) were measured. (h-k) The intergenic region between the two operons was inserted in both orientations into a promoter-less GFP vector to create a reporter construct to determine promoter activity. The promoter of *ompA* was used as a positive control. Transcriptional activity was measured by determining the relative fluorescence compared to bacteria without a reporter construct. Conditions tested included: (h) osmolarity, by culturing in low [8 mM] or high [595 mM] salt concentrations; (i) nutrient availability, by culturing in low (M9 minimal media) and high (TSB) nutrient conditions; (j) temperature, by culturing at 30°C or 37°C; and (k) membrane stress and permeability by adding polymyxin B (10 µg ml⁻¹). A two-way ANOVA with Sidak's correction was applied to test for significance. **= p<0.01, NS=non-significant.</figcaption></figure>

saw no increased GFP expression under these conditions and therefore could not identify conditions to increase T6SS activity
*in vitro*.

To activate the operon, we therefore chose to artificially induce T6SS transcription with a divergent promoter in which the two
operons can be induced with arabinose and IPTG [42] (Fig. 4a). We confirmed transcription of both operons by qRT-PCR
of the first gene in each operon (*tssB* and *hcp2* respectively, Fig. 4b, c). The inducible strains, SS381<sup>IND</sup> and CIP1063447<sup>IND</sup>,
showed arabinose-dependent expression of *tssB* from P<sub>BAD</sub>. However, *hcp2* was expressed even in the absence of IPTG, suggesting
leaky expression from P<sub>tac</sub>. Importantly induction of SS381<sup>IND</sup> and CIP1063447<sup>IND</sup> expressed significantly more *tssB* and *hcp2* in
comparison to the strains with the native promoters.

These strains were then used in bacterial killing assays (Fig. 4d, e) to determine whether increased expression of the T6SS would
alter the anti-bacterial activity of *S. sonnei*. As previously observed, *E. coli* was efficiently killed by *S. sonnei* regardless of induction
state or the absence/presence of the inducible promoter (Fig. 4d, e).

S. sonnei anti-bacterial activity is mediated by colicins

Since the anti-bacterial activity displayed by *S. sonnei* against *E. coli* in the competition assays does not appear to be due to T6SS activity, we next investigated the role of colicins. *S. sonnei* strains often harbour colicins on a small multicopy plasmid, spB which encodes E-class colicins. The spB backbone consists of plasmid mobilisation genes (*mobA*, *exc1*, *exc2*) and genes essential for colicin expression; *cea* (the colicin gene), *cei* (the colicin immunity gene) and *cel* (colicin lysis gene required for colicin release)
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 4.** Replacement of the native promoters of the T6SS with an inducible version increases T6SS gene expression but does not show evidence of increased anti-bacterial activity. (a) A divergent promoter containing the *P*<sub>BAD</sub> and *P*<sub>tac</sub> was inserted to replace the native promoters within the regulatory region of the *S. sonnei* T6SS locus. The inducible promoters allowed for regulated control via the supplementation of arabinose and IPTG during bacterial culture. (b-c) RT-qPCR experiments were conducted using extracted RNA to determine gene expression of (b) *tssB* and c) *hcp2*. (d-e) The wild-type and inducible strains of *S. sonnei* were then utilised in competition assays with *E. coli*. The amount of *E. coli*, remaining after competition was enumerated to measure the anti-bacterial activity of *S. sonnei*. Two-way ANOVAs were performed with uncorrected Fisher's LSD. *** = p<0.0001, ns = non-significant.</figcaption></figure>

(Fig. 5a). In order to examine if the anti-bacterial activity we observed in Figs 1 and 4 was due to colicin activity we used two approaches: removal of the colicin plasmid from *Shigella* strains or using a colicin-resistant prey strain.

E-class colicins exert their activity on susceptible bacteria after uptake via the OM receptor, BtuB [35, 43]. By using an *E. coli* Δ*btuB* strain, the effects of E-class activity should therefore be eliminated as they cannot enter the target cell. When *E. coli* Δ*btuB* was used as the prey strain against SS381 and CIP106347 T6SS⁺ and T6SS⁻ strains (Fig. 5b, c), the majority of anti-bacterial activity from *S. sonnei* was eliminated. This confirmed the anti-bacterial killing required the presence of BtuB and was therefore likely to be due to colicin activity.

To remove the colicin plasmid we used a CRISPR system targeting the pColE1 ori to cure spB from CIP106347 and CIP106347ΔT6 [44], creating strains CIP106347ΔspB and CIP106347ΔspBΔT6. Interestingly we were unable to cure spB from strain SS381, which may be due to the different activity of the colicins encoded by CIP106347 and SS381 (a pore-forming or DNAse colicin respectively). Removal of spB and therefore colicin production abrogated the anti-bacterial activity of CIP106347 when competed against *E. coli* (Fig. 5c). This further indicated that the anti-bacterial activity being measured was due to colicin activity.

We then went on to test the inducible T6SS strains in bacterial killing assays using the colicin resistant *E. coli* Δ*btuB* as the prey to determine whether any T6SS activity could now be detected. The colicin resistant *E. coli* Δ*btuB* was not killed by either the native or inducible versions of SS381 confirming no T6SS activity was occurring (Fig. 5d). We did see a significant difference in *E. coli* Δ*btuB* recovery when competed with the induced versus non-induced CIP106347<sup>IND</sup> (Fig. 5e). However, this difference was also seen for the native CIP106347 and even the negative control (no competing bacteria). Therefore we conclude that the
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 5.** The anti-bacterial activity of *S. sonnei* is due to the activity of E-type colicins encoded on spB. (a) A plasmid map of CIP106347 spB depicting the colicin genes encoded: *cea* (the colicin gene), *cei* (the colicin immunity gene) and *cel* (colicin lysis gene required for colicin release). Also depicted are regions involved in replication (ori and *rop*), recombination (cer) and plasmid mobilisation genes (*mobA*, *exc2* and *exc1*). (b-e) Competition assays of an *E. coli* prey strain against attacker strains of *S. sonnei* were conducted at 37°C during their exponential growth phases on agar plates. (b and c) The colicin-susceptible *E. coli* (*or* *E. coli*<sup>*km*</sup>) but not the colicin-resistant *E. coli* Δ*btuB* (*or* *E. coli* Δ*btuB*<sup>*km*</sup>) were efficiently killed by both SS381 and SS381ΔT6 (b) and CIP106347 and CIP106347ΔT6 (c). In addition, the anti-bacterial activity of CIP106347 was significantly reduced when the plasmid encoding spB was removed from CIP106347 (ΔspB and ΔspBΔT6). (d and e) The wild-type and inducible strains of *S. sonnei* were then utilised in competition assays with colicin resistant *E. coli* Δ*btuB* (*or* *E. coli* Δ*btuB*<sup>*km*</sup>). The amount of *E. coli* Δ*btuB* remaining after competition was enumerated to measure the anti-bacterial activity of *S. sonnei*. Each graph represents the mean±SEM of at least three biological replicates. Mixed-effects models (b and c) or two-way ANOVAs were performed with uncorrected Fisher's LSD (d and e). \*= *p*<0.05, \*\*= *p*<0.01, \*\*\*= *p*<0.00001, ns=non-significant.</figcaption></figure>

addition of arabinose and IPTG caused an unexplained small reduction in the recoverable *E. coli* Δ*btuB* in this assay. Therefore
this is no evidence of T6SS activity even following synthetic induction of the T6SS operons.

**Colicins produced by *S. sonnei* are active against closely related bacteria**

To further test the anti-bacterial activity of colicins we measured the killing activity present in the supernatant of our isogenic
mutants on *E. coli* and *E. coli* Δ*btuB* using an overlay method (Fig. 6a). As predicted from the competition assays the supernatant
of all strains except those cured of spB were able to kill wild-type *E. coli*, but not *E. coli* Δ*btuB*. This indicates the presence of a
secreted anti-bacterial agent encoded on spB that requires BtuB for activity.

Colicins target closely related bacteria [34, 35, 45, 46]. To test the specificity of the colicins produced by our clinical isolates we screened a panel of human-associated commensal bacteria, which also included some potential pathogens (Fig. 6b). The majority of *E. coli* isolates tested were susceptible to colicin-mediated killing, with only two wild-type isolates (a hospital isolate 3111E2-3 and a faecal isolate APC110) resistant to colicin mediated killing. All non-*E. coli* strains tested were resistant to colicin-mediated killing demonstrating the narrow activity spectrum of these colicins.

We used WGS data and PCR sequencing of the *cea* and *cei* genes to identify the colicins present in a selection of clinical isolates and identified the colicins encoded by these strains as E1 (CIP106347), E7 (SS381), E2 (SS595), E5 (SS474) and E7 (SS074). Of these colicins E1 is a pore-forming colicin while the remainder cleave either DNA (E2 and 7) or tRNA (E5). We confirmed the presence of colicin E1 in the supernatant of CIP106347 by mass spectrometry (MS). Colicin expression was upregulated by addition of mitomycin C and visualised by SDS-PAGE of the concentrated supernatants. A band at 57 kDa (MW of colicin E1) was
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 6.** *S. sonnei* secreted colicins only target closely related bacteria and are dependent on the presence of BtuB. (a) A diffusible indicator assay where a susceptible *E. coli* or non-susceptible *E. coli* Δ*btuB* are seeded in soft LB-agar. Filtered supernatants from the indicated strains were then spotted onto the *E. coli* lawns. Zones of clearance indicate the presence of a secreted colicin. (b) A panel of human associated commensal bacteria were also tested for their susceptibility to colicin. Zone of clearance (grey) indicates the presence of a secreted colicin and a sensitive strain. No zone of clearance (red) indicates either no colicin secreted or a resistant strain. Abbreviations; SL: *S. typhimurium*, KP: *K. pneumoniae*, KO: *K. oxytoca*, EC: *E. coli*, PA: *P. aeruginosa*, CR: *C. rodentium*, CF: *C. freundii*. (c) CIP106347 was grown in LB medium with or without the SOS agent Mitomycin C for 5h, pelleted, the supernatant filtered and concentrated. Concentrated *S. sonnei* supernatants were subjected to SDS-PAGE and proteins visualised by Coomassie blue staining. The predicted position of ColE1 (57.2 kDa) is indicated by the red arrow. MS analysis of this band indicated it was colicin E1. Molecular weight markers (in kDa) are indicated on the left.</figcaption></figure>

excised and analysed by MS. The most abundant protein identified was Colicin E1 with 222 spectral counts in the no mitomycin C lane and 1055 counts in the presence of mitomycin C (Fig. 6c).

We then used our collection of *S. sonnei* strains encoding different colicins to investigate colicin killing using a quantitative plate reader assay (Fig. 7a–g). The supernatant of each strain was added to *E. coli* and *E. coli* Δ*btuB* and the OD₆₀₀ measured over a 3 h time course. In the presence of *E. coli* EDL933 supernatant, which contains no identifiable colicins, or CIP106347ΔspB both strains grew equally well (Fig. 7a, b). By contrast the supernatant of all *S. sonnei* strains restricted the growth of wild-type *E. coli*, but not *E. coli* Δ*btuB* over the time course, suggesting the presence of E-type colicins in all tested *S. sonnei* supernatants (Fig. 7c–g).

E1 colicin activity has previously been demonstrated to be dependent on TolA for import into the prey bacteria, while other E-type colicins can use either TolA or TonB for import [34, 47]. We tested the ability of supernatants containing pore-forming (E1), and non-pore-forming (E2 and E7) to inhibit the growth of SS381 and SS381Δ*tolA* (Fig. 7h–l). The supernatants of EDL933 and CIP106347ΔspB were inactive against both SS381 strains as expected (Fig. 7h, i). The supernatant of SS381 (colicin E7) was
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 7.** Colicin activity is dependent on BtuB and, for Colicin E1, TolA. Colicin-containing supernatant from the indicated strains of *S. sonnei* or EHEC was added to (a-g) *E. coli* WT and *E. coli* Δ*btuB* or (h-l) SS381 and SS381Δ*tolA*. The OD600 of *E. coli* or *S. sonnei* was measured every ten minutes for 3 h while shaking at 37°C. (a-g) Growth inhibition of the WT *E. coli* but not *E. coli* Δ*btuB* was observed for all colicin-containing supernatants tested. (h-l) No growth inhibition of SS381 and SS381Δ*tolA* was seen for (h) EHEC control supernatant, (i) CIP106347Δ*s*pB or (j) SS381 E7-containing supernatant. (k) Growth inhibition of the SS381 but not SS381Δ*tolA* was observed for CIP106347 E1-containing supernatant, while (l) both SS381 and SS381Δ*tolA* were inhibited by SS595 E2-containing supernatant. Each graph represents the mean±SEM of three biological replicates.</figcaption></figure>

also inactive against both SS381 strains due to the presence of the E7 immunity protein in this strain (Fig. 7j). As predicted the supernatant containing the pore-forming E1 colicin was able to inhibit the growth of SS381 but was unable to inhibit growth of SS381Δ*tolA* (Fig. 7k). The supernatant containing the E2 colicin was able to inhibit both SS381 and SS381Δ*tolA*, indicating TolA-independent import (Fig. 7l).

DISCUSSION

The discovery of a T6SS in *S. sonnei* but not in *S. flexneri* was predicted to favour *S. sonnei* during niche competition in the gut [17]. We were unable to demonstrate T6SS-dependent anti-bacterial killing by *S. sonnei* in our *in vitro* assays. Initially, we used isogenic T6SS⁺ and T6SS⁻ *S. sonnei* strains and found no difference in their anti-bacterial capability against *E. coli*. *E. coli* were very efficiently killed in this competition assay, however the effect was independent of the T6SS. The *S. sonnei* strains tested were unable to inhibit closely related Enterobacteriaceae such as *S. typhimurium* or *K. pneumoniae*, indicating a narrow spectrum of anti-bacterial activity. We then used a secretion assay to determine if the T6SS was active, but perhaps not involved in anti-bacterial competition. While Hcp expression was observed no Hcp was detected in the supernatant indicating there was no T6SS activity.

The lack of measurable T6SS activity led us to perform an *in silico* analysis of the T6SS from *S. sonnei* WGS. This showed that all T6SS clusters were predicted to be non-functional due to inactivation of at least one, but often multiple T6SS core gene across all lineages [48, 49]. While all strains had mutations in key T6SS components there is variability in the requirement for different components in different bacteria and it may be that some of these mutations do not disrupt the function of the T6SS. For example, the *C. rodentium* TssM is expressed as a truncated 807aa protein but translational slippage allows a 1129aa full length protein to also be translated. In fact, both forms of TssM are required for T6SS activity in *C. rodentium* [50]. As we had been unable to find a condition in which we could increase expression from the native T6SS promoters we instead chose to create an inducible T6SS to confirm whether the T6SS was functional despite the observed mutations. However, even this strain displayed no anti-bacterial activity suggesting that the accumulated mutations within the *S. sonnei* T6SS may render it non-functional.
<table><caption>**Table 2. Bacterial strains table**</caption><thead><tr><th>Strain name</th><th>Description</th><th>Origin</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S. sonnei 53G</td><td>Lab isolate.<br>(Lineage 2)</td><td>[59]</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei H140860381 (SS381)</td><td>Clinical isolate belonging to the global lineage III<br>clade. Fluroquinolone resistant.<br>(Lineage 3.6.1.1)</td><td>Claire Jenkins (UK Health Security Agency,<br>UKHSA)</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei H140500074 (SS074)</td><td>Clinical isolate belonging to the Latin America<br>lineage II-b. (Lineage 2.11)</td><td>Claire Jenkins (UKHSA)</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei H144900595 (SS474)</td><td>Clinical isolate belonging to the global lineage III<br>clade.<br>(Lineage 3.7)</td><td>Claire Jenkins (UKHSA)</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei H144900595 (SS595)</td><td>Clinical isolate belonging to the global lineage III<br>clade.<br>(Lineage 3.7.25)</td><td>Claire Jenkins (UKHSA)</td></tr><tr><td>SS381ΔtolA</td><td>SS381 TolA mutant deleted by homologous<br>recombination.</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>SS381ΔT6</td><td>T6SS mutant. tssF deleted by homologous<br>recombination.</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>SS381<sup>IND</sup></td><td>SS381 derivative with native T6SS promoters<br>replaced with pBAD and pTac.</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>S. sonnei CIP106347 (CIP106347)</td><td>Clinical isolate. Sm<sup>R</sup> and Tet<sup>R</sup>.<br>(Lineage 3.7)</td><td>Kind gift from Marteyn Lab (University of<br>Strasbourg) [17]</td></tr><tr><td>CIP106347ΔT6</td><td>T6SS mutant. tssF deleted by homologous<br>recombination [17]</td><td>Kind gift from Marteyn Lab (University of<br>Strasbourg)</td></tr><tr><td>CIP106347ΔspB</td><td>Colicin plasmid (spB) removed from parental strain<br>CIP106347</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>CIP106347ΔT6ΔspB</td><td>Colicin plasmid (spB) removed from CIP106347<br>ΔtssF</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>CIP106347<sup>IND</sup></td><td>CIP106347 derivative with native T6SS promoters<br>replaced with pBAD and pTac.</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>E. coli BZB1011 tn7-Pmax-GFP (E. coli)</td><td>W33110, NaI<sup>R</sup>, Str<sup>R</sup></td><td>Kind gift from Elisa Granato (University of Oxford)</td></tr><tr><td>E. coli BZB1011 tn7-Pmax-GFPΔbtuB (E. coli<br>ΔbtuB)</td><td>btuB deletion strain that renders this strain resistant<br>to all E-class colicins</td><td>Kind gift from Elisa Granato (University of Oxford)</td></tr><tr><td>E. coli BZB1011 tn7-Pmax-GFP + pULTRA-GFP-<br>Km (E. coli<sup>Km</sup>)</td><td>W33110, NaI<sup>R</sup>, Str<sup>R</sup>, Km<sup>R</sup></td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>E. coli BZB1011 tn7-Pmax-GFPΔbtub+pULTRA-<br>GFP-Km (E. coli Δbtub<sup>Km</sup>)</td><td>btuB deletion strain that renders this strain resistant<br>to all E-class colicins. NaI<sup>R</sup>, Str<sup>R</sup>, Km<sup>R</sup></td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>EHEC EDL933</td><td>Enterohemorrhagic E. coli. Human pathogen</td><td>[60]</td></tr><tr><td>EPEC E2348/69</td><td>Enteropathogenic E. coli. Human pathogen</td><td>[61]</td></tr><tr><td>E. coli 3101E3-33</td><td>Human commensal strain. Isolated from a human<br>faecal sample from a Crohn's patient.</td><td>Kind gift from Frankel Lab (Imperial College<br>London)</td></tr><tr><td>E. coli 3111E2-3</td><td>Human commensal strain. Isolated from a human<br>faecal sample from a Crohn's patient.</td><td>Kind gift from Frankel Lab (Imperial College<br>London)</td></tr><tr><td>E. coli APC110</td><td>Hospital isolate</td><td>Kind gift from Frankel Lab (Imperial College<br>London)</td></tr><tr><td>E. coli K12</td><td>Non-pathogenic E. coli</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>E. coli MG1655</td><td>Non-pathogenic E. coli</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>E. coli DH5α</td><td>E. coli used for routine cloning.</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

Continued
<table><caption>**Table 2. Continued**</caption><thead><tr><td>Strain name</td><td>Description</td><td>Origin</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>E. coli CC118λpir</td><td>pSEVA plasmid propagating strain</td><td>[55]</td></tr><tr><td>E. coli 1047 helper pRK2013</td><td>Helper strain to mobilise pSEVA-612S from CC118λpir to receiver strains</td><td>[62]</td></tr><tr><td>Salmonella enterica typhimurium SL1344</td><td>Wild-type</td><td>[63]</td></tr><tr><td>Klebsiella oxytoca KO4.5</td><td>Isolated from murine gastrointestinal tract</td><td>Kind gift from Frankel lab (Imperial College London)</td></tr><tr><td>Klebsiella pneumoniae 43816</td><td>Wild-type</td><td>ATCC</td></tr><tr><td>Klebsiella pneumoniae INF206</td><td>Clinical isolate</td><td>Kind gift from Holt Lab (Monash University)</td></tr><tr><td>Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAK</td><td>A laboratory reference strain</td><td>Kind gift from Filloux Lab (Imperial College London)</td></tr><tr><td>Citrobacter rodentium ICC168</td><td>Mouse pathogen</td><td>Kind gift from Frankel Lab (Imperial College London)</td></tr><tr><td>Citrobacter freundii P079E</td><td>Human commensal opportunistic pathogen isolated from infant faeces.</td><td>[64]</td></tr><tr><td>C. freundii P106E</td><td>Human commensal opportunistic pathogen isolated from infant faeces.</td><td>[64]</td></tr></tbody></table>

One of the strains used in this study S. sonnei CIP106347 was previously demonstrated to possess T6SS-dependent anti-bacterial activity *in vitro* and *in vivo* against a lab isolate of E. coli and two isolates of S. flexneri [17]. Under the conditions we tested, we were unable to show T6SS-dependent anti-bacterial activity with this isolate. We cannot rule out that a threshold level of induction is required for activity to be observed which we did not reach even with our inducible strains. However, our data is in agreement with a recent computational-based study which indicated the ability of S. sonnei to kill E. coli was strongly associated with colicin genes rather than the T6SS [33].

We therefore sought to provide experimental data to show that the anti-bacterial activity that we observed for S. sonnei against E. coli was due to colicin activity [13]. By using both an E. coli strain that was resistant to E-class colicins (ΔbtuB) and S. sonnei isogenic strains with no colicins (ΔspB), we confirmed that the S. sonnei anti-bacterial activity measured in our assays was indeed due to the presence of colicins. We further demonstrate for colicin E1 from strain CIP106347 that it is upregulated by mitomycin C and is reliant on TolA for import into the recipient cell. Also in concordance with existing literature about colicins [34, 35, 45, 51, 52], we show that activity of S. sonnei colicins tested within this study is restricted to closely related bacteria, i.e. E. coli strains. It is of note that two out of eight of the E. coli isolates were resistant to colicin-mediated killing. These two strains were a human faecal isolate and a hospital isolate respectively. The ability of these strains to resist colicin killing could be due to a resistant BtuB phenotype or the presence of compatible colicin immunity genes.

To conclude, we have experimental evidence validating observations that S. sonnei anti-bacterial activity is associated with colicins rather than the T6SS [33]. We hypothesise that this anti-bacterial activity is likely one factor that helps S. sonnei establish itself during infection of the human gut by competing with closely related strains for common resources in the nutrient limited colon. *Shigella* species are human adapted pathogens and the primary replicative niche of S. flexneri is the nutrient-rich IEC cytosol. However, S. sonnei does not access the IEC cytosol as efficiently as S. flexneri [53] and therefore it may require additional mechanisms in order to compete with the resident microbiota for limited resources in the terminal ileum and colon. S. sonnei strains are closely related to E. coli [54] and are likely to directly compete with the resident E. coli commensals for nutrient availability in this niche. Our study suggests that S. sonnei may achieve this through the action of colicins.

# METHODS

## Bacterial strains

Bacteria strains are described in Table 2. All *Shigella* strains were routinely cultured in Tryptic soy broth (TSB) or on Tryptic soy agar (TSA). TSA plates were supplemented with 0.01% Congo red to identify and culture *Shigella* colonies that retained the large virulence plasmid. *Shigella* strains were maintained at 37°C. Non-*Shigella* strains were routinely maintained in Lysogeny Broth (LB) or on Lysogeny Agar (LA) unless otherwise stated. The following antibiotics were supplemented as required: ampicillin (Amp, 100 µg ml⁻¹), kanamycin (Km, 50 µg ml⁻¹), chloramphenicol (Cm, 30 µg ml⁻¹), gentamicin (Gm, 20 µg ml⁻¹), nalidixic acid
<table><caption>**Table 3.** Primers table</caption><thead><tr><th>Primer name</th><th>Primer sequence (5'-3')</th><th>Description</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>tssF-fw</td><td>TAGTCGACATCCACACCGCCGTTACGAAAACTGATGT</td><td>500 bp of homology and coding region of tssF for cloning into pSEVA-612S.</td></tr><tr><td>tssF-rv</td><td>CTATCTAGATACCAGGTTGCGCTAAGCGTGAGA</td><td>With SalI and XbaI sites.</td></tr><tr><td>tssF-inv-fw</td><td>TTGTCAGTCCACCCGGTAATGCTGGC</td><td>Inverse primers to remove the coding sequence of tssF from pSEVA-612S-tssF</td></tr><tr><td>tssF-inv-rv</td><td>ATGGACGGAAAGAATCGGGCAGCATC</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>tssF-check fw</td><td>GAGGGTCGTTCTTCCGGTGTGC</td><td>Primers to check deletion of tssF</td></tr><tr><td>tssF-check rv</td><td>GGCCTGGATGCTGGCATGCAAT</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>colE-replicon fw</td><td>CCGACAGGACTATAAAGATACC</td><td>Primers to check removal of plasmids with colE-like replicons</td></tr><tr><td>colE-replicon rv</td><td>CTCAAGACGATAGTTACCGG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>pRL128-inv-rv</td><td>GAAGCAGCTCCAGCCTACAC</td><td>Primers to remove KanR cassette from pRL128</td></tr><tr><td>pRL128-inv-fw</td><td>GAACTGCAGGTCGACGGATC</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>pRL128-prom-fw</td><td>GTGTTGGCATTTGGCTGTTTCCTGTGTG</td><td>Primers to amplify inducible promoters from pRL128-ΔkanR</td></tr><tr><td>pRL128-prom-rv</td><td>TTTTGCTCATGGGTATGGAGAAACAGTAG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>T6-Operon1-fw</td><td>GGATTACCCTGTTATCCCTACGCCAGTCGTCGGCACCG</td><td>Primers to amplify the Rv promoter and 500 bp of homology for the T6SS (tssB)</td></tr><tr><td>T6-Operon1-rv</td><td>AAACAGCCAAATGCCAACACCGTGTTATATCTCCATCACTG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>T6-Operon2-fw</td><td>CTCCATACCCATGAGCAAAAAAATTTGAAGG</td><td>Primers to amplify the Fw promoter and 500 bp of homology for the T6SS (hcp2)</td></tr><tr><td>T6-Operon2-rv</td><td>TAATTACCCTGTTATCCCTATATTTATTGCTCACCAGAC</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>hcp1-exp fw</td><td>ATTCCCGGGATGGCAAATATAAGTTATTTATC</td><td>hcp1 from 53G with XmaI and KpnI sites for cloning into pSA10-4XHA</td></tr><tr><td>hcp1-exp rv</td><td>CAGGGTACCCCTGTACACGATCCTGCC</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>hcp2-exp fw</td><td>ATTCCCGGGATGCCAACACCGTGTTATATC</td><td>hcp2 from 53G with XmaI and KpnI sites for cloning into pSA10-4XHA</td></tr><tr><td>hcp2-exp rv</td><td>CAGGGTACCCTGCTTCCAGTGGTCGC</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>GFP-T6SS-1 fw</td><td>CGTTAACAAGGAGTTTACAAATGCGTAAAGGCGAAGAGC</td><td>Promoter region from T6SS operon 1 (tssB) cloned into pULTRA-GFP for fluorescent reporter assay</td></tr><tr><td>GFP-T6SS-1 rv</td><td>TAACATGACGGATCACTTTTCAGAAATCATCCTTAGCGAAAGCTAAG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>GFP-T6SS-2 fw</td><td>TAACATGACGGATCACTTTTATGCGTAAAGGCGAAGAGC</td><td>Promoter region from T6SS operon 2 (hcp2) cloned into pULTRA-GFP for fluorescent reporter assay</td></tr><tr><td>GFP-T6SS-2 rv</td><td>CGTTAACAAGGAGTTTACAACAGAAATCATCCTTAGCGAAAGCTAAG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>GFP-ompA fw</td><td>ATGATAACGAGGCGCAAAAAATGCGTAAAGGCGAAGAGC</td><td>Promoter region for ompA cloned into pULTRA-GFP for fluorescent reporter assay</td></tr><tr><td>GFP-ompA rv</td><td>TCAGACAAGCCTCCGCAAGGCAGAAATCATCCTTAGCGAAAGC</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>T6HR2 fw</td><td>GGATTACCCTGTTATCCCTACGCCAGTCGTCGGCACCG</td><td>Amplify 500 bp homology from T6SS operon 2</td></tr><tr><td>T6HR2 rv</td><td>AAACAGCCAAATGCCAACACCGTGTTATATCTCCATCACTG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>pInd fw</td><td>GTGTTGGCATTTGGCTGTTTCCTGTGTG</td><td>Amplify inducible promoter from pRL128ΔkanR</td></tr><tr><td>pInd rv</td><td>TTTTGCTCATGGGTATGGAGAAACAGTAG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>T6HR1 fw</td><td>CTCCATACCCATGAGCAAAAAAATTTGAAGG</td><td>Amplify 500 bp homology from T6SS operon 1</td></tr><tr><td>T6HR1 rv</td><td>TAATTACCCTGTTATCCCTATATTTATTGCTCACCAGAC</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR rho fw</td><td>GTGATGGCGTACTGGAGATATT</td><td>qPCR primers for rho.</td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR rho rv</td><td>GGTTGAAACGGCGGATTTG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR tssB fw</td><td>CTGAAGGGAAGCACAACAGA</td><td>qPCR primers for tssB.</td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR tssB rv</td><td>ACGCAGTTCCAGCAATTTATTC</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

Continued
<table><caption>**Table 3. Continued**</caption><thead><tr><td>Primer name</td><td>Primer sequence (5'-3')</td><td>Description</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>RT-qPCR hcp2 fw</td><td>TGGTCAGACCCAGGGAAATA</td><td>qPCR primers for hcp2.</td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR hcp2 rv</td><td>AATTCCTGCACCAGCATCTC</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR tssF fw</td><td>AAATGTATCTGCTCGGTACGG</td><td>qPCR primers for tssF.</td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR tssF rv</td><td>ATGTCTCCTGGCTTTCTGTG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR tssH fw</td><td>ATGTGCTCAACCTGTTCTACC</td><td>qPCR primers for tssH.</td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR tssH rv</td><td>GGCATGCTCGACTATTACCTG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR tssA1 fw</td><td>GCCAGGACTTACATGCTTTTG</td><td>qPCR primers for tssA1.</td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR tssA1 rv</td><td>CGTCAACAGAGACTCAATGGG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR rpoS fw</td><td>AGCTTATGGGACAACTCACG</td><td>qPCR primers for rpoS.</td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR rpoS rv</td><td>CGCTTCTCAACATACGCAAC</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR aat fw</td><td>CCTCACAGAATACCAGAAGCG</td><td>qPCR primers for aat.</td></tr><tr><td>RT-qPCR aat rv</td><td>TCATGCCCACTCCATTGAAG</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

(Nal, 50 µg ml⁻¹). Where required for the inducible T6SS strains, liquid media was supplemented with 0.2% (v/v) L-arabinose and 500 µM IPTG.

## Molecular biology

All routine PCR cloning used Q5 DNA polymerase or OneTaq DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, NEB) following manufacturer protocols. Primers are shown in Table 3 and plasmids in Table 4. Cloning constructs were generated using restriction digests and ligations or using Gibson Assembly as per the manufacturer's protocols (all enzymes from NEB). Constructs were confirmed by sequencing (Eurofins Genomics). S. sonnei deletion mutants were made using a tri-parental conjugation and recombination method as previously described [55, 56]. In brief, the T6SS deletion mutant was constructed by cloning *tssF* ±500 bp into the vector pSEVA-612S. *tssF* was then removed by an inverse amplification of this vector to yield a plasmid only containing the flanking regions of *tssF*. This deletion vector was mobilised and conjugated into the parental S. sonnei strain to yield merodiploid clones. Activation of the inducible I-SceI from pACBSR removed merodiploids and deletion mutants were screened by PCR for confirmation (Table 3). Subsequent removal of pACBSR was achieved by serial passaging in liquid culture without antibiotic selection.

KanR was removed from pRL128 by inverse PCR using primers pRL128inv fw and rv. Then 500 bp flanking the intergenic T6SS promoter region, and the promoter region of pRL128ΔkanR were amplified with primers T6HR1 fw and rv, T6HR2 fw and rv and pInd fw and rv respectively. Fragments were Gibson assembled and cloned into pJET1.2 to form pJET-T6<sup>IND</sup>. The inducible promoter with flanking homology regions was digested from pJET-T6<sup>IND</sup> with I-SceI and ligated into I-SceI digested pSEVA612S to form pSEVA-T6<sup>IND</sup> which was then used in a tri-parental conjugation and recombination as above.

The removal of the small S. sonnei plasmid encoding colicin (spB) was achieved using the pFREE plasmid curing system (Table 4) [44].

Protein expression constructs for Hcp1 and Hcp2 (Table 3) were amplified from S. sonnei 53G and cloned into the pSA10-4xHA vector to add C-terminal HA tags to Hcp1 and Hcp2. These constructs were transformed into S. sonnei strains.

## RT-qPCR analysis of the T6SS

RNA was prepared from bacterial strains that were grown to exponential state as per manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen RNeasy). cDNA was synthesised from the extracted RNA by following the manufacturer's instructions (Promega, M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase). Samples were then probed with the appropriate primer sets with PowerUp SYBR Green (Thermofisher) in a Quantstudio 1 Real-Time PCR system (Thermofisher). Samples were compared by relative gene fold expression normalised to the housekeeping gene (*rhoB*) with the following formulas:

$$ \Delta Ct = Ct (\text{gene of interest}) - Ct (\text{housekeeping gene, (rhoB)}) $$

$$ \text{Relative gene expression} = 2^{-\Delta Ct} $$
<table><caption>**Table 4.** Plasmids table</caption><thead><tr><td>Plasmid</td><td>Description</td><td>Origin</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>pSEVA612S</td><td>Integrative plasmid with ori R6K and oriT for conjugation. Used in tri-parental conjugation based cloning. GmR.</td><td>[55]</td></tr><tr><td>pSEVA612S-tssF</td><td>pSEVA-612S derivative with flanking and coding region of SS381-tssF.</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>pSEVA612S-ΔtssF</td><td>pSEVA-612S derivative constructed with inverse PCR of parental plasmid, used for genomic deletion of tssF.</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>pACBSR</td><td>Expresses I-SceI and lambda-red induced by L-Ara used in tri-parental conjugation based cloning.</td><td>[65]</td></tr><tr><td>pFREE</td><td>Inducible CRISPR-Cas9 plasmid that removes ColE-like replicons. AmpRs</td><td>[44], pFREE was a gift from Morten Norholm (Addgene plasmid # 92050</td></tr><tr><td>pRL128</td><td>Plasmid with pBAD and pTac in divergent orientations.</td><td>[42], pRL128 was a gift from Eric Cascales (Addgene plasmid # 40180</td></tr><tr><td>pRL128ΔkanR</td><td>pRL128 derivative with kanamycin resistance cassette removed</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>pJET-T6<sup>IND</sup></td><td>pJET1.2 with promoter region from pRL128-ΔkanR and flanking T6SS operon 1 and 2 homology regions</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>pSEVA612S-T6<sup>IND</sup></td><td>pSEVA612S derivative with promoter region from pRL128-ΔkanR and flanking T6SS operon 1 and 2 homology regions. Used to replace the native promoters by tri-parental conjugation based cloning</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>pSA10-4XHA</td><td>IPTG inducible protein over-expression plasmid with integrated 4xHA tags</td><td>[66]</td></tr><tr><td>pSA10-4XHA-hcp1</td><td>pSA10 derivative with SS53G-hcp1</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>pSA10-4XHA-hcp2</td><td>pSA10 derivative with SS53G-hcp2</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>pULTRA-gfp-P<sub>T6SS1</sub></td><td>Fluorescent reporter plasmid containing intergenic region of the S. sonnei T6SS, orientated to transcribe operon 1</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>pULTRA-gfp-P<sub>T6SS2</sub></td><td>Fluorescent reporter plasmid containing intergenic region of the S. sonnei T6SS, orientated to transcribe operon 2</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>pUTRA-gfp-P<sub>ompA</sub></td><td>Fluorescent reporter plasmid containing promoter region for S. sonnei ompA</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><td>pULTRA-GFP-Km</td><td>Fluorescent reporter plasmid with a kanamycin resistance cassette used for selective plating</td><td>[67]</td></tr></tbody></table>

## T6SS Hcp secretion assay

S. sonnei cultures were induced with 1 mM IPTG at OD<sub>600</sub>=0.2. After a further 60 min of growth, liquid cultures were harvested and concentrated to an OD<sub>600</sub>=5.0. The cell pellet (cellular fraction) was resuspended in reducing Laemmli buffer and heated at 95°C for 5 min. The supernatant fraction was filtered sterilised with a 0.22 µm filter and precipitated with trichloroacetic acid. The precipitated supernatant fraction was resuspended in reducing Laemmli buffer and heated at 95°C for 5 min. All samples were separated on a 15% SDS-PAGE and proteins transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were probed with mouse α-HA (Biolegend) or mouse α-DnaK (Stressgen). Followed by an anti-mouse HRP conjugated secondary antibody (Sigma Aldrich). Membranes were then incubated with ECL reagent and visualised on a BioRad ChemiDoc XRS+system.

## Bacterial competition assays

Bacteria strains were cultured in LB media and harvested during the exponential growth phase. Subsequently, they were concentrated to OD<sub>600</sub>=1.0, mixed in a 10:1 ratio (attacker: prey bacteria) and competed against each other on an LB agar plate at 37°C for 5 h. For the inducible T6SS strains, bacteria were competed against each other on a LB agar plate supplemented with 2% (v/v) L-arabinose and 500 µm IPTG and incubated at 37°C for 5 h. After competition, prey CFUs were recovered by plating serial dilutions onto selective media for the prey bacteria. E. coli (BZB1011) and the Δbtub derivative were selected for using nalidixic acid. SS381 however is resistant to nalidixic acid and therefore competition assays with SS381 as the attacker strain required the use of E. coli transformed with a selective plasmid (pULTRA-GFP-Km) to allow kanamycin selection of the E. coli prey.
## Colicin diffusion assays

Exponential phase indicator bacteria were inoculated into soft LA (0.7% w/v) and overlaid on top of an LA plate (1.5% w/v). Bacterial strains that were tested for colicin activity were harvested by centrifugation at 17500 g for 5 mins followed by filtration of the supernatant through sterile 0.22 µm filters. Supernatants were spotted onto the indicator bacteria plates and incubated overnight at 37°C with zones of clearances indicating the presence of a diffusible anti-bacterial compound, i.e. colicins.

## Quantitative colicin plate reader assays

Overnight cultures of indicator strains *E. coli* (WT and Δ*btuB*) or SS381 (WT and Δ*tolA*) were diluted to OD600=0.75. Then 100 µl of supernatant from each *S. sonnei* strain or EHEC was added to 100 µl of either *E. coli* WT or *E. coli* Δ*btuB* in a 96 well plate in triplicate. The plate was incubated at 37°C for 3 h with shaking in a plate reader to measure the OD600 of the *E. coli* indicator strains in the presence of the colicins.

## Preparation of culture supernatants for proteomics analysis

*S. sonnei* CIP106347 were diluted from overnight cultures and grown in LB until OD600=1, in triplicate. Cells were then incubated with or without mitomycin C (final concentration of 0.5 µg ml⁻¹) at 37°C for 2 h to induce colicin production. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation at 4200 g for 10 min at 4°C followed by filtration of the supernatant through sterile 0.22 µm filters and precipitated with trichloroacetic acid. Acetone was removed and the pellets air dried.

Proteins precipitated from 30 ml of culture supernatant were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and visualised by Coomassie staining. SDS-PAGE bands were excised from the gel, destained in cycles of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and 50 mM ammonium containing 50% (v/v) acetonitrile, dehydrated with acetonitrile and then reduced with 10 mM DTT and alkylated with 55 mM iodoacetamide (45 min each at 56°C or at RT in the dark, respectively). Samples were washed and dehydrated then 40 ng of modified sequencing-grade trypsin (Promega, Fitchburg, MA, USA) was added on each dehydrated gel piece for overnight digestion at 37°C. Resulting peptides were then extracted from the gel pieces in 60% acetonitrile and 5% formic acid and vacuum-dried before injection in mass spectrometry. The peptide mixtures were separated on a C-18 analytic column (75 µm ID ×25 cm nanoViper, 3 µm Acclaim PepMap) on an Easy-nanoLC-1000 system and analysed on a Q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany).

MS data were searched with Mascot (version 2.8.0.1, Matrix Science) against the databases of *S. sonnei*, contaminants (UniprotKB, version 2021_02, 22 219 and 111 sequences, respectively), as well as a homemade database of *E. coli* colicins' sequences (48 sequences). Proteins were validated on Mascot rank equal to one, a Mascot score threshold set at 25, and 1% FDR on both peptide spectrum matches (PSM) and protein sets (based on Mascot score) in ProlineStudio v2.1.2 (ProFI).

## Bioinformatics analysis

Easyfig (V2.2.2) [57] was used to generate the nucleotide synteny figure. Proksee was used to generate and annotate (integrated tools pLannote v1.1.0 and Prokka v1.1.1) the CIP106347 spB plasmid map [58]. *S. sonnei* typing was performed using the open source genotyping tool (V20210201) based on the *Shigella* genotyping scheme [49].

## Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed in Graphpad Prism (V.10.1.0). Statistical tests are described in figure legends. Data from competition assays were log transformed and statistical analysis performed on the transformed data. Significance values are annotated as ns=non significant, P≤0.05=*, P≤0.01=**, P≤0.001=***, P≤0.0001=****.

## Funding information

This work was supported by a Medical Research Council grant MR/X00080X/1 and a Research England GCRF grant (A.C). P.B.L was supported by a Wellcome Trust PhD studentship (220057/Z/19/Z). The instruments used for the mass spectrometry analysis was funded by the IdEx 'Equipement mi-lourd' 2015 from the University of Strasbourg.

## Acknowledgements

The Clements group would like to thank members of the Centre for Microbial Resistance Biology (CBRB) at Imperial College London for their scientific input and advice. We acknowledge Johana Chicher from the Plateforme Protéomique Strasbourg Esplanade (CNRS) for performing the mass spectrometry analysis. We thank Claire Jenkins (UKHSA) for the provision of *S. sonnei* clinical isolates and their corresponding WGSs.

## Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Author contributions

P.B.L and X.M.M contributed to the conceptualization, supervision, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing, and visualization. B.R, K.P.H, H.C.C, S.A, T.C, O.F contributed to methodology, investigation, data curation, writing and visualisation. A.C. and B.M contributed to conceptualization, project administration, funding, resources, validation, supervision, data curation, writing and visualization.

References

1. Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. *Lancet* 2013;382:209–222.

2. Ashkenazi S, Levy I, Kazaronovski V, Samra Z. Growing antimicrobial resistance of Shigella isolates. *J Antimicrob Chemother* 2003;51:427–429.

3. Baker KS, Dallman TJ, Field N, Childs T, Mitchell H, et al. Genomic epidemiology of Shigella in the United Kingdom shows transmission of pathogen sublineages and determinants of antimicrobial resistance. *Sci Rep* 2018;8:7389.

4. Bardsley M, Jenkins C, Mitchell HD, Mikhail AFW, Baker KS, et al. Persistent transmission of shigellosis in England is associated with a recently emerged multidrug-resistant strain of *Shigella sonnei*. *J Clin Microbiol* 2020;58:e01692–01619.

5. Chung The H, Bodhidatta L, Pham DT, Mason CJ, Ha Thanh T, et al. Evolutionary histories and antimicrobial resistance in *Shigella flexneri* and *Shigella sonnei* in Southeast Asia. *Commun Biol* 2021;4:353.

6. Salleh MZ, Nik Zuraina NMN, Hajissa K, Ilias MI, Banga Singh KK, et al. Prevalence of multidrug-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing *Shigella* Species in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. *Antibiotics* 2022;11:1653.

7. Tajbakhsh M, García Migura L, Rahbar M, Svendsen CA, Mohammadzadeh M, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant Shigella infections from Iran: an overlooked problem? *J Antimicrob Chemother* 2012;67:1128–1133.

8. Thompson CN, Duy PT, Baker S. The rising dominance of *Shigella sonnei*: an intercontinental shift in the etiology of bacillary dysentery. *PLoS Negl Trop Dis* 2015;9:e0003708.

9. Vinh H, Nhu NTK, Nga TVT, Duy PT, Campbell JI, et al. A changing picture of shigellosis in southern Vietnam: shifting species dominance, antimicrobial susceptibility and clinical presentation. *BMC Infect Dis* 2009;9:204.

10. DuPont HL, Levine MM, Hornick RB, Formal SB. Inoculum size in shigellosis and implications for expected mode of transmission. *J Infect Dis* 1989;159:1126–1128.

11. Yang F, Yang J, Zhang X, Chen L, Jiang Y, et al. Genome dynamics and diversity of *Shigella* species, the etiologic agents of bacillary dysentery. *Nucleic Acids Res* 2005;33:6445–6458.

12. Hershberg R, Tang H, Petrov DA. Reduced selection leads to accelerated gene loss in Shigella. *Genome Biol* 2007;8:R164.

13. Holt KE, Thieu Nga TV, Thanh DP, Vinh H, Kim DW, et al. Tracking the establishment of local endemic populations of an emergent enteric pathogen. *Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A* 2013;110:17522–17527.

14. Kotloff KL, Winickoff JP, Ivanoff B, Clemens JD, Swerdlow DL, et al. Global burden of Shigella infections: implications for vaccine development and implementation of control strategies. *Bull World Health Organ* 1999;77:651–666.

15. Lima IFN, Havt A, Lima AAM. Update on molecular epidemiology of Shigella infection. *Curr Opin Gastroenterol* 2015;31:30–37.

16. Matanza XM, Clements A. Pathogenicity and virulence of *Shigella sonnei*: a highly drug-resistant pathogen of increasing prevalence. *Virulence* 2023;14:2280838.

17. Anderson MC, Vonaesch P, Saffarian A, Marteyn BS, Sansonetti PJ. *Shigella sonnei* encodes a functional T6SS used for interbacterial competition and niche ccupancy. *Cell Host Microbe* 2017;21:769–776.

18. Journet L, Cascales E. The type VI secretion system in *Escherichia coli* and related species. *EcoSal Plus* 2016;7.

19. Bingle LE, Bailey CM, Pallen MJ. Type VI secretion: a beginner's guide. *Curr Opin Microbiol* 2008;11:3–8.

20. Salomon D, Gonzalez H, Updegraff BL, Orth K. Vibrio parahaemolyticus type VI secretion system 1 is activated in marine conditions to target bacteria, and is differentially regulated from system 2. *PLoS One* 2013;8:e61086.

21. Wan B, Zhang Q, Ni J, Li S, Wen D, et al. Type VI secretion system contributes to Enterohemorrhagic *Escherichia coli* virulence by secreting catalase against host reactive oxygen species (ROS). *PLoS Pathog* 2017;13:e1006246.

22. Ma AT, Mekalanos JJ. In vivo actin cross-linking induced by Vibrio cholerae type. *Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A* 2010;107:4365–4370.

23. Trunk K, Peltier J, Liu Y-C, Dill BD, Walker L, et al. The type VI secretion system deploys antifungal effectors against microbial competitors. *Nat Microbiol* 2018;3:920–931.

24. Si M, Zhao C, Burkinshaw B, Zhang B, Wei D, et al. Manganese scavenging and oxidative stress response mediated by type VI secretion system in *Burkholderia thailandensis* *Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A* 2017;114:E2233–E2242.

25. Bernard CS, Brunet YR, Gueguen E, Cascales E. Nooks and crannies in type VI secretion regulation. *J Bacteriol* 2010;192:3850–3860.

26. Bernard CS, Brunet YR, Gavioli M, Lloubès R, Cascales E. Regulation of type VI secretion gene clusters by sigma54 and cognate enhancer binding proteins. *J Bacteriol* 2011;193:2158–2167.

27. Stolle A-S, Meader BT, Toska J, Mekalanos JJ. Endogenous membrane stress induces T6SS activity in pseudo. *Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A* 2021;118:e2018365118.

28. Monjarás Feria J, Valvano MA. An overview of anti-eukaryotic T6SS effectors. *Front Cell Infect Microbiol* 2020;10:584751.

29. Hernandez RE, Gallegos-Monterrosa R, Coulthurst SJ. Type VI secretion system effector proteins: effective weapons for bacterial competitiveness. *Cell Microbiol* 2020;22:e13241.

30. Boyer F, Fichant G, Berthod J, Vandenbrouck Y, Attree I. Dissecting the bacterial type VI secretion system by a genome wide in silico analysis: what can be learned from available microbial genomic resources? *BMC Genomics* 2009;10:104.

31. Jani AJ, Cotter PA. Type VI secretion: not just for pathogenesis anymore. *Cell Host Microbe* 2010;8:2–6.

32. Allsopp LP, Bernal P, Nolan LM, Filloux A. Causalities of war: the connection between type VI secretion system and microbiota. *Cell Microbiol* 2020;22:e13153.

33. De Silva PM, Bennett RJ, Kuhn L, Ngondo P, Debande L, et al. *Escherichia coli* killing by epidemiologically successful sublineages of *Shigella sonnei* is mediated by colicins. *EBioMedicine* 2023;97:104822.

34. Cascales E, Buchanan SK, Duché D, Kleanthous C, Lloubès R, et al. Colicin biology. *Microbiol Mol Biol Rev* 2007;71:158–229.

35. Smarda J, Obdrzálek V. Incidence of colicinogenic strains among human *Escherichia coli*. *J Basic Microbiol* 2001;41:367–374.

36. Pukatzki S, McAuley SB, Miyata ST. The type VI secretion system: translocation of effectors and effector-domains. *Curr Opin Microbiol* 2009;12:11–17.

37. Alam A, Golovliov I, Javed E, Sjöstedt A. ClpB mutants of Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica and tularensis are defective for type VI secretion and intracellular replication. *Sci Rep* 2018;8:11324.

38. Dong T, Kirchhof MG, Schellhorn HE. RpoS regulation of gene expression during exponential growth of *Escherichia coli* K12. *Mol Genet Genomics* 2008;279:267–277.

39. Gomes AÉI, Stuchi LP, Siqueira NMG, Henrique JB, Vicentini R, et al. Selection and validation of reference genes for gene expression
studies in Klebsiella pneumoniae using reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR. *Sci Rep* 2018;8:9001.

40. Choi U, Lee C-R. Distinct roles of outer membrane porins in antibiotic resistance and membrane integrity in *Escherichia coli*. *Front Microbiol* 2019;10:953.

41. Ho BT, Basler M, Mekalanos JJ. Type 6 secretion system-mediated immunity to type 4 secretion system-mediated gene transfer. *Science* 2013;342:250–253.

42. Gueguen E, Cascales E. Promoter swapping unveils the role of the citrobacter rodentium CTS1 type VI secretion system in interbacterial competition. *Appl Environ Microbiol* 2013;79:32–38.

43. Calcuttawala F, Hariharan C, Pazhani GP, Ghosh S, Ramamurthy T. Activity spectrum of colicins produced by *Shigella sonnei* and genetic mechanism of colicin resistance in conspecific *S. sonnei* strains and *Escherichia coli*. *Antimicrob Agents Chemother* 2015;59:152–158.

44. Lauritsen I, Porse A, Sommer MOA, Nørholm MHH. A versatile one-step CRISPR-Cas9 based approach to plasmid-curing. *Microb Cell Fact* 2017;16:135.

45. Gordon DM, O'Brien CL. Bacteriocin diversity and the frequency of multiple bacteriocin production in *Escherichia coli*. *Microbiology* 2006;152:3239–3244.

46. Kleanthous C. Swimming against the tide: progress and challenges in our understanding of colicin translocation. *Nat Rev Microbiol* 2010;8:843–848.

47. Schendel SL, Click EM, Webster RE, Cramer WA. The TolA protein interacts with colicin E1 differently than with other group A colicins. *J Bacteriol* 1997;179:3683–3690.

48. Holt KE, Baker S, Weill F-X, Holmes EC, Kitchen A, et al. *Shigella sonnei* genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis indicate recent global dissemination from Europe. *Nat Genet* 2012;44:1056–1059.

49. Hawkey J, Paranagama K, Baker KS, Bengtsson RJ, Weill F-X, et al. Global population structure and genotyping framework for genomic surveillance of the major dysentery pathogen, *Shigella sonnei*. *Nat Commun* 2021;12:2684.

50. Gueguen E, Wills NM, Atkins JF, Cascales E. Transcriptional frameshifting rescues *Citrobacter rodentium* type VI secretion by the production of two length variants from the prematurely interrupted tssM gene. *PLoS Genet* 2014;10:e1004869.

51. Mock M, Pugsley AP. The BtuB group col plasmids and homology between the colicins they encode. *J Bacteriol* 1982;150:1069–1076.

52. Pugsley AP. *Escherichia coli* K12 strains for use in the identification and characterization of colicins. *J Gen Microbiol* 1985;131:369–376.

53. Caboni M, Pédron T, Rossi O, Goulding D, Pickard D, et al. An O antigen capsule modulates bacterial pathogenesis in *Shigella sonnei*. *PLoS Pathog* 2015;11:e1004749.

54. The HC, Thanh DP, Holt KE, Thomson NR, Baker S. The genomic signatures of Shigella evolution, adaptation and geographical spread. *Nat Rev Microbiol* 2016;14:235–250.

55. Herrero M, de Lorenzo V, Timmis KN. Transposon vectors containing non-antibiotic resistance selection markers for cloning and stable chromosomal insertion of foreign genes in gram-negative bacteria. *J Bacteriol* 1990;172:6557–6567.

56. Ruano-Gallego D, Sanchez-Garrido J, Kozik Z, Núñez-Berrueco E, Cepeda-Molero M, et al. Type III secretion system effectors form robust and flexible intracellular virulence networks. *Science* 2021;371:eabc9531.

57. Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. *Bioinformatics* 2011;27:1009–1010.

58. Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK, et al. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. *Nucleic Acids Res* 2023;51:W484–W492.

59. Kopecko DJ, Washington O, Formal SB. Genetic and physical evidence for plasmid control of *Shigella sonnei* form I cell surface antigen. *Infect Immun* 1980;29:207–214.

60. O'Brien AO, Lively TA, Chen ME, Rothman SW, Formal SB. *Escherichia coli* O157:H7 strains associated with haemorrhagic colitis in the United States produce a Shigella dysenteriae 1 (SHIGA) like cytotoxin. *Lancet* 1983;1:702.

61. Levine MM, Bergquist EJ, Nalin DR, Waterman DH, Hornick RB, et al. *Escherichia coli* strains that cause diarrhoea but do not produce heat-labile or heat-stable enterotoxins and are non-invasive. *Lancet* 1978;1:1119–1122.

62. Figurski DH, Helinski DR. Replication of an origin-containing derivative of plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function provided in trans. *Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A* 1979;76:1648–1652.

63. Aswad D, Koshland DE Jr. Isolation, characterization and complementation of Salmonella typhimurium chemotaxis mutants. *J Mol Biol* 1975;97:225–235.

64. Chen Y, Brook TC, Alcon-Giner C, Clarke P, Hall LJ, et al. Draft genome sequences of citrobacter freundii and citrobacter murliniae strains isolated from the feces of preterm infants. *Microbiol Resour Announc* 2019;8:33.

65. Ruano-Gallego D, Álvarez B, Fernández LÁ. Engineering the controlled assembly of filamentous injectisomes in *E. coli* K-12 for protein translocation into mammalian cells. *ACS Synth Biol* 2015;4:1030–1041.

66. Clements A, Stoneham CA, Furniss RCD, Frankel G. Enterohaemorrhagic *Escherichia coli* inhibits recycling endosome function and trafficking of surface receptors. *Cell Microbiol* 2014;16:1693–1705.

67. Mavridou DAI, Gonzalez D, Clements A, Foster KR. The pUltra plasmid series: a robust and flexible tool for fluorescent labeling of Enterobacteria. *Plasmid* 2016;87–88:65–71.

Edited by: M. Welch and D. Mavridou

The Microbiology Society is a membership charity and not-for-profit publisher.

Your submissions to our titles support the community – ensuring that we continue to provide events, grants and professional development for microbiologists at all career stages.

Find out more and submit your article at microbiologyresearch.org