# Design Principles and Challenges in Achieving Zero-Energy Manufacturing Facilities

Charles Onyeka Nwamekwe, Charles Chikwendu Okpala, Emeka Celestine Nwabunwanne

► To cite this version:

Charles Onyeka Nwamekwe, Charles Chikwendu Okpala, Emeka Celestine Nwabunwanne. Design Principles and Challenges in Achieving Zero-Energy Manufacturing Facilities. Journal of Engineering Research and Applied Science, 2025, 14 (1), pp.1-21. [hal-05209694](https://hal.science/hal-05209694v1)

HAL Id: hal-05209694

https://hal.science/hal-05209694v1

Submitted on 14 Aug 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Design Principles and Challenges in Achieving Zero-Energy Manufacturing Facilities

Charles Onyeka Nwamekwe¹,*, Chikwendu Charles Okpala², Emeka Celestine Nwabunwanne³

¹,²,³Industrial/Production Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria

¹(0009-0002-1918-1350) ID, ²(0000-0002-6512-419X) ID, ³(0009-0009-6422-4429) ID

Accepted 22 April 2025

## Abstract

The global push towards sustainability has amplified the importance of Zero-Energy Manufacturing Facilities (ZEMFs), which aim to achieve energy neutrality by balancing energy consumption with on-site renewable generation. This research explores the foundational principles, design considerations, and challenges inherent in realizing ZEMFs. It begins by addressing the architectural and engineering design principles, emphasizing energy-efficient materials, passive design strategies, and optimal site selection to maximize natural resource utilization. The study also delves into advanced technological integrations, such as renewable energy systems, smart energy management, and industrial energy recovery solutions, which are critical for achieving operational energy balance. Furthermore, the research identifies economic, regulatory, and technical challenges, such as high initial costs, evolving policy landscapes, and integration complexities, that hinder the widespread adoption of ZEMFs. By proposing scalable frameworks and actionable recommendations, this study contributes to the development of sustainable manufacturing practices, aligning with global climate goals and industrial decarbonization efforts. The findings underscore the transformative potential of ZEMFs in reducing environmental footprints while ensuring economic viability, paving the way for future advancements in sustainable industrial operations.

**Keywords:** Net-Zero Energy, Energy Efficiency, Green Manufacturing, Industrial Energy Management, Circular Economy, Environmental Sustainability

## 1. Introduction

The transition towards Zero-Energy Manufacturing Facilities (ZEMFs) is critical in addressing the industrial sector's substantial energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. ZEMFs are defined as facilities that generate as much energy as they consume annually, primarily through renewable sources, thus aligning with global sustainability goals [1]. Implementing ZEMFs involves intricate design principles, including energy-efficient building designs, integration of renewable energy technologies, and optimization of energy flows within manufacturing processes [2,3].

Challenges in achieving ZEMFs include the need for advanced energy management systems, which can effectively balance energy supply and demand, particularly in the context of intermittent renewable energy sources [4]. Moreover, the complexity of manufacturing operations necessitates innovative approaches such as digital twin simulations and energy flexibility measures to enhance operational

efficiency and minimize waste [5]. As industries strive for net-zero emissions, the adoption of these principles and technologies will not only mitigate environmental impacts but also yield long-term economic benefits through reduced operational costs and enhanced resilience against energy price fluctuations.

Achieving zero-energy status in manufacturing facilities necessitates a comprehensive understanding of foundational design principles and the identification of critical challenges. The design principles for ZEMFs include the integration of renewable energy sources, energy-efficient building designs, and advanced energy management systems. These principles are essential for ensuring that the energy produced on-site meets or exceeds the energy consumed annually, thereby minimizing reliance on non-renewable energy sources [6].

However, several challenges impede the widespread implementation of ZEMFs. These include the need for sophisticated energy modelling and simulation tools to
optimize energy flows and the integration of intermittent renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind [5]. Additionally, the complexity of manufacturing processes requires a holistic approach to energy management that encompasses both production and facility energy consumption [3,4]. Addressing these challenges will require collaboration across architectural and engineering disciplines to develop innovative solutions that facilitate the transition to sustainable manufacturing practices [1].

## 1.2. Objective of the Review

The objective of this review is to explore the foundational design principles and critical challenges associated with achieving ZEMFs. The ZEMFs concept is increasingly vital in the context of global sustainability goals and the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the manufacturing sector, which is responsible for a significant portion of global energy consumption and emissions [7].

The ZEMFs principles necessitate a holistic approach that considers not only the energy consumption of manufacturing processes but also the energy dynamics of the facility as a whole. For instance, employing big data analytics and intelligent systems can optimize energy usage and enhance decision-making processes in manufacturing environments [2]. Furthermore, the application of energy-efficient practices in machining operations is crucial, as machining is a fundamental process that significantly contributes to overall energy demand in manufacturing.

Despite the promising potential of ZEMFs, several challenges hinder their widespread adoption. These include the need for substantial upfront investments, the complexity of integrating renewable energy sources into existing manufacturing systems, and the necessity for skilled personnel to manage advanced energy technologies [8]. Additionally, the variability of renewable energy sources poses a challenge for maintaining consistent energy supply, which can be addressed through innovative energy storage solutions and flexible energy management strategies. Overcoming these barriers requires collaboration across disciplines, including architecture, engineering, and data science, to develop comprehensive strategies that facilitate the transition to sustainable manufacturing.

## 1.3. Scope and Structure of the Review

The scope of this review encompasses the architectural and engineering design principles necessary for ZEMFs and the technological, economic, and operational challenges they face. The

analysis of academic literature, industry reports, and case studies will be conducted to identify common themes and successful strategies. This paper is organized to first present the design principles, followed by an analysis of challenges and practical examples, and concludes with future research directions.

# 2. Design Principles for Zero-Energy Manufacturing Facilities

## 2.1. Definition of Zero-Energy Facilities

Zero-energy facilities (ZEFs) are defined as buildings or infrastructures that achieve net-zero energy consumption over the course of a year as shown in figure 1 below. This concept is particularly relevant in the context of manufacturing facilities, where the challenge lies in balancing energy-intensive processes with on-site renewable energy generation. For a manufacturing facility to be classified as zero-energy, it must meet specific criteria, including high energy efficiency, reliance on renewable energy sources, and the integration of advanced energy management systems.

Manufacturing facilities differ from residential or commercial zero-energy buildings due to their complex operational demands. These facilities often operate continuously, requiring a consistent energy supply to support various processes, which can include heavy machinery and climate control systems. Consequently, the design of ZEFs in manufacturing must account for process-specific energy requirements, which can fluctuate based on production schedules and operational intensity.

To achieve zero-energy status, manufacturers must implement innovative strategies that encompass energy-efficient technologies, such as advanced machinery that minimizes energy consumption during operation, and renewable energy systems like solar panels or wind turbines that can generate power on-site. Furthermore, the integration of smart energy management systems is crucial for monitoring energy usage in real-time and optimizing energy flows to ensure that production demands are met without exceeding energy generation capabilities [9].

## 2.2. Architectural Design Principles

Architectural design plays a crucial role in minimizing energy consumption in manufacturing facilities, particularly in the pursuit of ZEMFs. The architectural framework must prioritize energy efficiency, renewable energy integration, and the optimization of operational workflows to achieve net-zero energy consumption over a year. The key design principles
include the utilization of passive solar design, energy-
efficient materials, and advanced building
technologies that collectively contribute to reducing

the overall energy footprint of manufacturing
processes [10].

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Figure 1. A Schematic Diagram Representing Zero-Energy Manufacturing Facilities (Author's Simulated Design)</figcaption></figure>

One of the fundamental aspects of architectural design in ZEMFs is the incorporation of renewable energy sources, such as solar panels and wind turbines, which can provide on-site energy generation. This integration not only reduces reliance on external energy sources but also enhances the facility's resilience against energy price fluctuations [80]. Furthermore, the design must facilitate the efficient use of space and resources, ensuring that energy-intensive processes are strategically located to minimize energy loss and maximize operational efficiency [10].

The implementation of digital twin technologies is another innovative approach that can significantly enhance energy management in manufacturing facilities. By creating virtual replicas of physical systems, manufacturers can simulate various scenarios to optimize energy consumption and identify potential inefficiencies in real-time. This capability allows for proactive adjustments to be made in response to changing operational demands, thereby ensuring that energy usage remains within sustainable limits.

However, the architectural design of ZEMFs faces
several challenges. Manufacturing processes often
requires a tailored approach to energy management, as

different processes have unique energy demands [11]. Additionally, the initial investment costs for implementing advanced energy-efficient technologies can be a barrier for many manufacturers, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises [12]. Overcoming these challenges necessitates a collaborative effort among architects, engineers, and manufacturing professionals to develop integrated solutions that align with sustainability goals while maintaining operational effectiveness. The key principles of Architectural design include:

**Energy-Efficient Building Materials:** The selection of energy-efficient building materials is pivotal in minimizing energy consumption within manufacturing facilities, particularly in the context of achieving Zero-Energy Manufacturing Facilities (ZEMFs). High-performance insulation, reflective roofing, and double-glazed windows are essential components that contribute significantly to reducing heating and cooling demands, thereby enhancing the overall energy efficiency of the building envelope [13].

High-performance insulation materials are designed to minimize heat transfer, thereby maintaining stable indoor temperatures and reducing the reliance on heating and cooling systems. These materials can
include advanced composites, aerogels, and cellulose-
based insulations, which offer superior thermal
resistance compared to traditional insulation options
[14]. The use of such materials not only lowers energy
consumption but also contributes to improved
occupant comfort and reduced operational costs over
the building's lifecycle.

Reflective roofing is another critical design element that can significantly impact energy efficiency. By reflecting solar radiation, reflective roofing materials help to reduce the heat absorbed by the building, thereby decreasing the need for air conditioning during warmer months. This is particularly beneficial in regions with high solar exposure, where cooling demands can be substantial [15]. Studies have shown that implementing reflective roofing can lead to energy savings of up to 20% in cooling costs, making it a viable option for energy-conscious manufacturing facilities [16].

Double-glazed windows also play a crucial role in enhancing energy efficiency. These windows consist of two panes of glass separated by a gas-filled space, which provides excellent insulation against heat loss and gain. The incorporation of low-emissivity (Low-E) coatings further enhances their performance by reflecting infrared energy, thus keeping indoor spaces cooler in the summer and warmer in the winter. The use of double-glazed windows can reduce heating and cooling loads significantly, contributing to the net-zero energy goal of manufacturing facilities [17].

The challenges associated in the widespread adoption
of energy-efficient materials are discussed below. The
initial costs for high-performance materials can be
higher than conventional options, which may deter
manufacturers from investing in these solutions.
Additionally, the integration of advanced materials
requires careful consideration of the overall building
design and construction practices to ensure optimal
performance. Overcoming these barriers necessitates
collaboration among architects, engineers, and
manufacturers to develop cost-effective strategies that
promote the use of energy-efficient materials while
maintaining operational efficiency [18].

**Passive Design Strategies:** In the quest for ZEMFs, the incorporation of passive design strategies is essential for optimizing the use of natural resources and minimizing energy consumption. The key passive design strategies include natural ventilation, daylighting, and building orientation, which collectively enhance the energy efficiency of

manufacturing facilities while reducing reliance on
mechanical systems.

Natural ventilation is a critical component of passive
design, allowing for the circulation of fresh air without
the need for mechanical systems. This can be achieved
through strategically placed windows, vents, and
openings that facilitate cross-ventilation, thereby
reducing the need for air conditioning. Studies have
shown that effective natural ventilation can
significantly decrease indoor temperatures, leading to
lower energy consumption for cooling purposes.
Furthermore, integrating natural ventilation into the
design can improve indoor air quality, which is
particularly important in manufacturing environments
where air quality can be compromised by emissions
from machinery and materials.

Daylighting is another vital passive design strategy that leverages natural light to illuminate interior spaces, reducing the need for artificial lighting. By incorporating features such as skylights, light tubes, and large windows, manufacturers can maximize daylight penetration while minimizing glare and heat gain. Research indicates that effective daylighting can reduce energy consumption for lighting by a significant margin, thereby contributing to the overall energy efficiency of the facility. Additionally, exposure to natural light has been linked to improved worker productivity and well-being, which can enhance operational efficiency in manufacturing settings.

Building orientation is also crucial in passive design, as it determines how a building interacts with solar radiation and prevailing winds. Proper orientation can optimize solar gain during winter months while minimizing heat gain in the summer. For instance, orienting a building to maximize southern exposure can enhance passive solar heating, reducing the need for active heating systems. Moreover, thoughtful orientation can facilitate natural ventilation by aligning openings with prevailing winds, further enhancing energy efficiency.

Despite the benefits associated with passive design
strategies, some challenges exist in their
implementation. The manufacturing processes often
necessitates specific environmental controls that may
conflict with passive design principles. Additionally,
initial design and construction costs for implementing
these strategies can be higher than conventional
methods, potentially deterring manufacturers from
adopting them. Overcoming these challenges requires
a collaborative approach among architects, engineers,
and facility managers to ensure that passive design strategies are effectively integrated into the overall design of ZEMFs.

**Site Selection:** Site selection is a critical factor in the design and implementation of ZEMFs. Choosing locations that provide optimal access to renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, while minimizing environmental impact is essential for achieving net-zero energy consumption. The strategic placement of manufacturing facilities can significantly influence their energy efficiency and sustainability outcomes.

Access to renewable energy sources is paramount in site selection. For instance, locations with high solar insolation are ideal for solar photovoltaic (PV) installations, which can generate substantial amounts of electricity to meet the facility's energy needs [2]. Similarly, sites with consistent wind patterns are suitable for wind turbine installations, which can provide a reliable energy supply. Research indicates that integrating renewable energy systems into the design from the outset can lead to significant reductions in operational energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, the potential for energy generation should be assessed in conjunction with local climate conditions to ensure that the chosen site

## 2.3 Engineering Design Principles

Engineering innovations are vital to achieving zero-energy goals in manufacturing facilities, as they directly influence the efficiency and sustainability of energy use. The integration of advanced engineering design principles can significantly enhance the performance of ZEMFs by optimizing energy consumption and facilitating the incorporation of renewable energy sources. Key engineering design principles include the application of energy-efficient technologies, the use of sustainable materials, and the implementation of smart energy management systems.

One of the primary engineering design principles is the adoption of energy-efficient technologies. This includes the use of high-efficiency machinery and equipment that minimizes energy consumption during manufacturing processes. For instance, the implementation of variable frequency drives (VFDs) in motors can lead to significant energy savings by adjusting the motor speed to match the load requirements. Additionally, innovations in automation and robotics can optimize production processes, reducing energy waste and improving overall efficiency.

Sustainable materials also play a crucial role in engineering design for ZEMFs. The selection of materials with lower embodied energy can significantly reduce the overall energy footprint of manufacturing operations. For example, using recycled materials or sustainably sourced raw materials can minimize the environmental impact associated with material extraction and processing. Furthermore, the design of products and processes should consider lifecycle assessments to evaluate the environmental impacts from production through disposal, promoting a circular economy approach.

The implementation of smart energy management systems is another essential engineering principle. These systems utilize advanced data analytics and machine learning algorithms to monitor and optimize energy usage in real-time. By integrating Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, manufacturers can gain insights into energy consumption patterns, enabling them to make informed decisions that enhance energy efficiency. Moreover, the use of predictive maintenance techniques can reduce downtime and energy waste by ensuring that equipment operates at optimal efficiency.

**Energy Systems Integration:** Energy systems integration is a fundamental aspect of achieving ZEMFs, as it combines renewable energy technologies, such as solar photovoltaics (PV) and wind turbines, with traditional energy systems to ensure reliability and sustainability. This integration is essential for balancing energy supply and demand, particularly in manufacturing environments that often have fluctuating energy needs due to varying production schedules and operational intensities [19,20].

The integration of renewable energy technologies into manufacturing facilities begins with the assessment of the site's renewable energy potential. For instance, solar PV systems can be strategically installed on rooftops or adjacent land to harness solar energy, while wind turbines can be deployed in areas with favourable wind conditions. Research indicates that the combination of these renewable sources can provide a more stable and reliable energy supply, reducing dependence on grid electricity and fossil fuels [19,21]. Moreover, the use of hybrid systems that incorporate both solar and wind energy can enhance energy resilience, particularly in regions prone to energy shortages or fluctuations.

In addition to renewable energy generation, energy systems integration involves the implementation of
energy storage solutions, such as batteries or thermal storage systems. These technologies allow facilities to store excess energy generated during peak production times for use during periods of high demand or low renewable energy generation. This capability is crucial for maintaining operational continuity and minimizing energy costs [22]. For example, integrating battery storage with solar PV systems can enable manufacturers to utilize stored energy during non-sunny periods, thus optimizing energy use and reducing reliance on grid power [9].

Furthermore, advanced energy management systems play a vital role in the integration of renewable energy technologies. These systems utilize data analytics and machine learning algorithms to monitor energy consumption patterns and optimize energy flows within the facility. By analysing real-time data, manufacturers can make informed decisions regarding energy usage, ensuring that renewable energy is utilized efficiently while minimizing waste [1]. The implementation of demand-side management strategies, such as load shifting and peak shaving, can further enhance energy efficiency by aligning energy consumption with available renewable energy supply.

**Efficient HVAC Systems:** Implementing advanced heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems with smart controls is crucial for reducing energy use in Zero-Energy Manufacturing Facilities (ZEMFs). HVAC systems are among the largest energy consumers in buildings, accounting for approximately 40% to 50% of total energy consumption [23]. Therefore, optimizing these systems is essential for achieving energy efficiency and sustainability goals.

One of the key principles in designing efficient HVAC systems is the integration of advanced technologies that enhance operational performance while minimizing energy consumption. For instance, variable air volume (VAV) systems allow for the adjustment of airflow based on occupancy and demand, which can lead to significant energy savings compared to constant air volume systems [24]. Additionally, the use of demand-controlled ventilation (DCV) systems, which adjust ventilation rates based on real-time occupancy data, can further optimize energy use by ensuring that only the necessary amount of conditioned air is supplied.

Smart controls are another critical component of efficient HVAC systems. These controls utilize sensors and data analytics to monitor and manage HVAC operations dynamically. For example, systems

equipped with occupancy sensors can adjust heating and cooling based on the presence of occupants, thereby reducing energy waste during unoccupied periods. Moreover, predictive control strategies that incorporate weather forecasts and historical energy usage patterns can optimize HVAC performance, ensuring that energy is used efficiently while maintaining occupant comfort [23].

The integration of renewable energy sources, such as solar thermal systems, with HVAC systems can also enhance energy efficiency. By utilizing solar energy for heating water or air, manufacturers can reduce their reliance on conventional energy sources, further contributing to the zero-energy goal. Additionally, combined heat and power (CHP) systems can provide both electricity and thermal energy, improving overall energy efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions [20].

**Energy Storage Solutions:** Utilizing energy storage solutions, such as batteries and thermal storage, is essential for managing the intermittent energy supply from renewable sources in Zero-Energy Manufacturing Facilities (ZEMFs). These storage systems play a critical role in ensuring a reliable energy supply, optimizing energy use, and enhancing the overall sustainability of manufacturing operations.

Batteries, particularly lithium-ion batteries, are widely used in energy storage applications due to their high energy density and efficiency. They allow for the storage of excess energy generated during peak production times or sunny/windy days, which can then be utilized during periods of high demand or low renewable energy generation. This capability is crucial for manufacturing facilities that often experience fluctuating energy needs based on production schedules. Research indicates that integrating battery storage with renewable energy systems can lead to significant reductions in energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions, making it a viable option for achieving zero-energy goals.

Thermal storage systems, such as phase change materials (PCMs) and water tanks, are another effective solution for managing energy supply. These systems store thermal energy generated from renewable sources, such as solar thermal collectors, and release it when needed. For instance, during the day, excess solar energy can be used to heat water, which can then be stored and utilized for heating during the night or on cloudy days. This approach not only enhances energy efficiency but also reduces the
load on HVAC systems, contributing to overall energy savings in manufacturing facilities.

Moreover, the integration of energy management systems with storage solutions allows for real-time monitoring and optimization of energy use. These systems can analyse data from various sources, including weather forecasts and energy consumption patterns, to make informed decisions about when to charge or discharge storage systems. By optimizing energy flows, manufacturers can ensure that they are utilizing renewable energy to its fullest potential while minimizing reliance on grid electricity.

**Smart Manufacturing Technologies:** Leveraging smart manufacturing technologies, including the Internet of Things (IoT), sensors, and automation, is essential for achieving real-time energy optimization and process efficiency in ZEMFs. These technologies enable manufacturers to monitor, control, and optimize energy consumption dynamically, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and reducing environmental impact.

The IoT plays a pivotal role in smart manufacturing by connecting various devices and systems within a manufacturing facility. This connectivity allows for the collection and analysis of vast amounts of data related to energy consumption, equipment performance, and production processes. For instance, IoT-enabled sensors can monitor energy usage in real-time, providing insights into when and where energy is being consumed most heavily. This data can then be used to identify inefficiencies and implement targeted energy-saving measures. Research has shown that IoT applications can lead to significant energy savings in manufacturing operations by enabling better decision-making and resource management.

Sensors are integral to the functionality of smart manufacturing technologies. They can be deployed throughout the manufacturing process to gather data on various parameters, such as temperature, humidity, and equipment status. This information can be utilized to optimize HVAC systems, ensuring that energy is used efficiently while maintaining optimal working conditions for employees and equipment. For example, integrating occupancy sensors with HVAC systems allows for demand-controlled ventilation, which adjusts airflow based on the presence of workers, thereby reducing unnecessary energy consumption.

Automation also plays a crucial role in enhancing energy efficiency in manufacturing. Automated

systems can optimize production schedules and processes, reducing energy waste associated with idle machinery or inefficient workflows. For instance, advanced robotics can be programmed to operate during off-peak energy hours, taking advantage of lower energy costs and reducing the overall energy load during peak times. Moreover, automation can facilitate predictive maintenance by analysing equipment performance data to anticipate failures before they occur, thus minimizing downtime and energy waste.

## 2.4 Systems Integration and Optimization

Achieving synergy between architectural and engineering components is essential for the successful implementation of ZEMFs. Systems integration and optimization involve the coordinated design and operation of various building systems—such as HVAC, energy generation, and energy storage—to maximize energy efficiency and minimize environmental impact. This integrated approach is crucial for meeting the ambitious energy performance goals associated with ZEMFs.

One of the primary benefits of systems integration is the ability to create a holistic energy management strategy that encompasses all aspects of a facility's energy use. For instance, integrating renewable energy sources, such as solar photovoltaics (PV) and wind turbines, with energy storage solutions allows for the effective management of intermittent energy supply. This integration ensures that excess energy generated during peak production times can be stored and utilized during periods of high demand or low renewable energy generation [25,26]. Research indicates that a well-designed energy storage system can significantly enhance the reliability and resilience of manufacturing operations, thereby supporting the transition to zero-energy goals.

Moreover, optimizing the interaction between architectural features and engineering systems is critical for enhancing energy performance. For example, the design of building envelopes, including insulation and window placement, can significantly influence heating and cooling loads. When combined with advanced HVAC systems equipped with smart controls, these architectural features can lead to substantial reductions in energy consumption [27]. The integration of thermal energy storage systems, such as phase change materials (PCMs), can further enhance energy efficiency by storing excess thermal energy generated during the day for use during peak demand periods [28].
The role of advanced modelling and simulation tools cannot be overstated in the context of systems integration. These tools enable engineers and architects to analyse the interactions between various building systems and optimize their performance. For instance, building performance simulation (BPS) can be used to evaluate the energy consumption of different design alternatives, allowing for informed decision-making during the design phase [29]. Additionally, automated optimization techniques can help identify the best configurations for renewable energy systems, energy storage, and HVAC systems to achieve desired energy performance outcomes [30]. The systems integration and optimization involve the following:

**Developing Integrated Building Energy Models to Simulate and Optimize Performance:** The development of integrated building energy models is a critical step in achieving Zero-Energy Manufacturing Facilities (ZEMFs). These models enable the simulation and optimization of energy performance by providing a comprehensive understanding of how various building systems interact and affect overall energy consumption. By integrating architectural design, engineering systems, and operational parameters, these models facilitate informed decision-making that aligns with sustainability goals.

One of the primary advantages of integrated building energy models is their ability to simulate the dynamic interactions between different systems, such as heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC), lighting, and renewable energy sources. For instance, [6] emphasizes the importance of incorporating load and renewable generation uncertainties into energy models to enhance their realism and predictive accuracy. This approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of how energy demands fluctuate in response to varying operational conditions and external factors, such as weather changes.

Moreover, the use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in conjunction with energy modelling tools has gained traction in recent years. [31] highlight that BIM-based multi-objective optimization can significantly improve the design and performance of low-carbon and energy-saving buildings. By allowing for the visualization and analysis of building components and systems, BIM facilitates the identification of critical parameters that influence energy performance during the early design stages. This proactive approach can lead to more effective

energy conservation measures and a reduction in operational costs.

Model predictive control (MPC) is another innovative technique that can be integrated into building energy models to optimize performance. [32] describes the Technology, Architecture, Culture, and Operations (TACO) framework, which automates model predictive control of building systems. This framework enables real-time adjustments to HVAC and lighting systems based on occupancy patterns and energy availability, thereby enhancing energy efficiency and occupant comfort. The implementation of MPC can lead to substantial energy savings, particularly in facilities with variable occupancy and usage patterns.

Furthermore, the integration of various modelling tools and techniques can pose technical challenges. The interoperability of different software platforms and the need for standardized data formats can complicate the modelling process. To overcome the challenges of integration, it is essential to foster collaboration among architects, engineers, and software developers to create integrated workflows that streamline the modelling process and enhance the usability of energy simulation tools.

**Coordinating Design Teams Across Disciplines to Ensure Seamless Implementation:** Achieving ZEMFs requires the seamless integration of various design disciplines, including architecture, engineering, and operations management. Coordinating design teams across these disciplines is essential to ensure that all components of the facility work harmoniously towards the common goal of energy efficiency and sustainability. This coordination facilitates the development of integrated systems that optimize energy performance while addressing the complexities associated with modern manufacturing processes.

One of the primary challenges in coordinating design teams is the need for effective communication and collaboration among diverse stakeholders. Each discipline brings unique expertise and perspectives that must be aligned to achieve the desired outcomes. For instance, architects must consider the building's orientation and envelope design to maximize natural light and minimize heat gain, while engineers focus on the efficiency of HVAC systems and renewable energy integration [33]. Establishing a collaborative framework that encourages open dialogue and information sharing is critical for overcoming
potential conflicts and ensuring that all design
elements complement each other.

The use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) can significantly enhance coordination among design teams. BIM allows for the creation of a digital representation of the building, enabling various stakeholders to visualize and analyse the interactions between architectural and engineering systems [34]. This technology facilitates real-time collaboration, allowing teams to identify potential issues early in the design process and make necessary adjustments before construction begins. Research indicates that BIM can lead to improved project outcomes, including reduced energy consumption and enhanced sustainability [35].

Adopting a systems thinking approach is vital for
integrating various design components effectively.
This approach emphasizes the interdependencies
between different systems and encourages teams to
consider the broader implications of their design
choices. For example, decisions related to materials
selection can impact not only the building's energy
performance but also its lifecycle sustainability and
operational costs. By fostering a holistic perspective,
design teams can develop solutions that optimize
energy use while minimizing environmental impact.

Despite the benefits of coordinated design efforts,
several challenges persist. One significant barrier is
the potential for resistance to change among
stakeholders accustomed to traditional design
practices. As manufacturing technologies evolve,
there is a need for ongoing education and training to
ensure that all team members are equipped with the
knowledge and skills necessary to implement
innovative solutions effectively. Additionally, the
complexity of integrating advanced technologies,
such as IoT and automation, into existing
manufacturing processes can pose technical
challenges that require specialized expertise [36].

To address these challenges, it is essential to establish
clear leadership and governance structures that
facilitate collaboration among design teams. This
includes defining roles and responsibilities, setting
common goals, and implementing project
management practices that promote accountability
and transparency [34]. Furthermore, engaging
stakeholders early in the design process can help build
consensus and foster a shared commitment to
achieving zero-energy objectives.

**Using advanced energy management systems to monitor and adjust energy usage dynamically:** The implementation of advanced energy management systems (EMS) is crucial for achieving ZEMFs. These systems enable real-time monitoring and dynamic adjustment of energy usage, facilitating the integration of renewable energy sources and enhancing overall energy efficiency. By leveraging data analytics, IoT technologies, and automation, advanced EMS can optimize energy consumption patterns, reduce operational costs, and minimize environmental impacts.

One of the primary functions of advanced EMS is to
provide real-time monitoring of energy consumption
across various systems within a manufacturing
facility. This capability allows for the identification of
energy-intensive processes and equipment, enabling
manufacturers to make informed decisions regarding
energy use. For instance, by analysing energy
consumption data, manufacturers can pinpoint
inefficiencies and implement targeted interventions,
such as adjusting operational schedules or upgrading
equipment. Research has shown that facilities
equipped with advanced EMS can achieve energy
savings of up to 30% compared to those relying on
traditional energy management practices [1].

The integration of IoT technologies into energy
management systems further enhances their
effectiveness. IoT-enabled sensors can collect data on
energy usage, environmental conditions, and
equipment performance, providing a comprehensive
view of energy dynamics within the facility. This data
can be analysed to optimize energy flows and adjust
settings in real time. For example, if a manufacturing
process is consuming more energy than anticipated,
the EMS can automatically adjust the operation of
HVAC systems or machinery to reduce energy
consumption. This level of automation not only
improves energy efficiency but also enhances
operational flexibility, allowing manufacturers to
respond quickly to changes in production demands or
energy availability.

Advanced EMS can facilitate the integration of
renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, into
manufacturing operations. By dynamically adjusting
energy usage based on the availability of renewable
energy, manufacturers can maximize their use of clean
energy and minimize reliance on grid electricity. For
instance, during periods of high solar generation, the
EMS can prioritize the operation of energy-intensive
processes, effectively utilizing excess renewable
energy. This capability is particularly important in
achieving the net-zero energy goals of ZEMFs, as it
allows for a more sustainable and resilient energy
supply.

# 3. Challenges in Achieving Zero-Energy Manufacturing

## 3.1 Technological Challenges

Achieving zero-energy manufacturing presents significant technological challenges that hinder the effective deployment of renewable energy systems. One primary obstacle is the insufficient advancement of technologies necessary for integrating renewable sources into manufacturing processes. [37] highlight that technological barriers are moderately significant in this context, indicating a need for improved deployment strategies for renewable energy solutions. Furthermore, the transition towards an additive economy necessitates a radical restructuring of organizational frameworks, as noted by Melnyk which complicates the integration of new technologies into existing systems [38].

The complexity of manufacturing processes exacerbates these challenges. As Krugh and Mears discuss, the energy demand reduction in manufacturing is often met with difficulties in optimizing energy conservation techniques [39]. The implementation of smart technologies, as explored by [40], introduces additional layers of complexity, requiring robust data management and real-time monitoring to ensure energy efficiency. Overall, the synthesis of these findings underscores the multifaceted nature of technological challenges in achieving zero-energy manufacturing, necessitating innovative solutions and collaborative efforts across various sectors [1]. The key technological barriers include:

**Energy Storage Limitations:** The transition to zero-energy manufacturing is significantly hampered by energy storage limitations, particularly in current battery technologies. Traditional lithium-ion batteries, while prevalent, often lack the capacity to meet the high energy demands of manufacturing operations, especially during peak usage times. [41] emphasize that advancements in lithium-ion battery manufacturing are crucial for enhancing energy density and efficiency, yet challenges remain in scaling these technologies for industrial applications. Furthermore, the need for flexible and high-performance energy storage solutions is underscored by Gao who discuss the potential of supercapacitors as alternatives due to their rapid charge and discharge capabilities, although they too face limitations in energy density compared to batteries [42,40].

The integration of renewable energy sources into manufacturing processes necessitates robust energy storage systems that can handle variability in energy supply and demand. Nwamekwe and Okpala highlights that incorporating battery storage into manufacturing systems can significantly improve energy flexibility, yet the current technologies do not adequately address the scale required for industrial applications [43]. Additionally, innovative approaches such as 3D printing of energy storage devices are being explored to enhance performance and reduce costs. However, the challenge remains to develop energy storage systems that can efficiently support the dynamic energy requirements of modern manufacturing environments [21].

**Renewable Energy Reliability:** Achieving zero-energy manufacturing is significantly challenged by the reliability of renewable energy sources, particularly solar and wind, which are inherently variable. This variability necessitates the implementation of robust backup systems to ensure continuous energy supply during periods of low generation. As noted by Rekioua, the integration of hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) is crucial, as they combine multiple energy sources to mitigate the unpredictability of individual renewables [44]. The need for backup systems is further emphasized by Vavrík who discuss the design of machine backups in reconfigurable manufacturing systems, highlighting the importance of flexibility in manufacturing processes to adapt to energy supply fluctuations [45].

The economic implications of renewable energy reliability are significant. Mingolla indicates that regions with abundant wind energy can reduce costs by minimizing reliance on extensive backup systems, suggesting that strategic location selection can enhance energy reliability [46]. However, the transition to a more renewable-centric energy infrastructure requires careful planning and investment in backup technologies, as highlighted by Kozlova and Lohrmann, who advocate for a hybrid model that balances renewable investments with reliability needs [47]. Ultimately, the successful implementation of zero-energy manufacturing will depend on overcoming these reliability challenges through innovative energy management strategies and the integration of diverse energy sources.

**Smart Grid Integration:** The integration of smart grids into zero-energy manufacturing systems faces significant challenges, primarily due to inconsistent grid infrastructure and interoperability issues. The existing electrical grid often relies on outdated
technologies that are not conducive to the dynamic requirements of smart grids, which necessitate advanced communication and control systems. Ahsan highlights that the integration of electric vehicles (EVs) with the grid exemplifies the need for smart charging solutions that can adapt to variable energy demands; however, the current infrastructure lacks the capability to support such innovations effectively.

Interoperability between various devices and systems is another critical barrier. According to Panda and Das, the development of a comprehensive smart grid architecture model is essential for optimizing control and data analytics, yet many existing systems are not designed to communicate effectively with one another [48]. This lack of standardization complicates the integration of renewable energy sources and smart technologies, as noted by Radoglou-Grammatikis and Sarigiannidis, who emphasize that the combination of legacy and smart devices creates substantial security vulnerabilities and operational inefficiencies [49].

The complexity of integrating diverse technologies into a cohesive smart grid system can lead to increased operational risks. As discussed by Bernsmed, the introduction of advanced technologies into the grid raises security concerns that must be addressed to ensure reliable operation [50]. Therefore, overcoming these challenges is crucial for the successful adoption of smart grids in zero-energy manufacturing, necessitating a concerted effort to modernize infrastructure, enhance interoperability, and secure systems against potential threats.

## 3.2 Economic Barriers

### 3.2.1 High Costs of Renewable Energy Systems and Energy-Efficient Technologies

The high costs associated with renewable energy systems and energy-efficient technologies present significant barriers to achieving zero-energy manufacturing. Despite the declining costs of technologies such as solar panels and wind turbines, initial capital investments remain substantial. Bistline emphasize that while policy measures can drive emissions reductions, the financial implications of transitioning to renewable energy sources can deter investment, particularly in sectors with tight profit margins [51]. This is compounded by the need for complementary technologies, such as energy storage systems, which can further escalate costs [52].

The economic viability of energy-efficient technologies is often challenged by their upfront costs. Karali illustrate that while energy-efficient solutions can lead to significant long-term savings, the initial

investment can be a deterrent for many manufacturers [53]. This is particularly relevant in industries like iron and steel, where the adoption of energy-efficient technologies is critical yet often economically unfeasible without external support or incentives [53].

Additionally, the integration of renewable energy systems into existing manufacturing processes requires substantial modifications to infrastructure, which can incur high costs. Fernández highlights the need for decentralized systems in ammonia production as a case study, where the transition to cleaner technologies necessitates significant investment in new equipment and training [52]. Thus, addressing the high costs of renewable energy systems and energy-efficient technologies is essential for facilitating the transition to zero-energy manufacturing, requiring coordinated efforts from policymakers, industry stakeholders, and financial institutions to create a more favourable economic landscape.

### 3.2.2 Uncertainty in Return on Investment, Particularly in Regions with Volatile Energy Markets

The uncertainty in return on investment (ROI) in renewable energy projects, particularly in regions with volatile energy markets, poses a significant challenge to achieving zero-energy manufacturing. Investors often face unpredictable market conditions, which can lead to hesitancy in committing capital to renewable energy technologies. Gazheli and Bergh discuss how real options analysis can help navigate these uncertainties by allowing investors to diversify their portfolios across different renewable technologies, thereby mitigating risks associated with price fluctuations [54]. This approach is particularly relevant in volatile markets where the costs and benefits of renewable energy investments can vary significantly over time.

The impact of economic uncertainty on renewable energy investments is underscored by Liu who found that fluctuations in energy prices can significantly affect the stock performance of renewable energy companies [41]. This volatility can deter potential investors who are concerned about the stability of returns, particularly in regions where energy prices are subject to rapid changes due to geopolitical factors or market dynamics. Similarly, Chen highlights that interest rate uncertainty can negatively impact investments in renewable energy, further complicating the financial landscape for potential investors [55].

The evolving policy environment can create further uncertainty. As noted by Chronopoulos, frequent
changes in government support schemes can complicate investment decisions, making it difficult for investors to assess the long-term viability of renewable energy projects [56]. This uncertainty can lead to a reluctance to invest, as stakeholders may prefer to wait for more stable conditions before committing resources. Therefore, addressing the uncertainties surrounding ROI in renewable energy investments is crucial for fostering a conducive environment for zero-energy manufacturing initiatives.

## 3.3 Regulatory and Policy Constraints

### 3.3.1 Lack of Standardized Regulations for Zero-Energy Certification

The lack of standardized regulations for zero-energy certification significantly impedes the progress toward achieving zero-energy manufacturing. Without a unified framework, manufacturers face challenges in understanding the criteria and processes required for certification, leading to inconsistencies in implementation and compliance. Olatunde emphasizes that the absence of consistent green industry standards can result in confusion among stakeholders, ultimately hindering the adoption of eco-friendly practices in industries [57]. This inconsistency can deter investment in renewable technologies, as potential investors may perceive the lack of clear guidelines as a risk.

Moreover, the variability in certification standards across regions complicates the ability of manufacturers to benchmark their performance against peers. The proliferation of private certification schemes can lead to market fragmentation, where multiple, often conflicting standards coexist. Timmermans and Epstein argue that this situation creates a "world of standards but not a standard world," where organizations may comply with various certifications without achieving meaningful sustainability outcomes [58]. The need for a harmonized approach to zero-energy certification is critical for fostering transparency, accountability, and trust among stakeholders, which are essential for driving the transition to zero-energy manufacturing.

### 3.3.2 Limited Government Subsidies and Tax Benefits for Renewable Energy Adoption

The limited availability of government subsidies and tax benefits for renewable energy adoption presents a significant challenge to achieving zero-energy manufacturing. Such financial incentives are crucial for offsetting the high initial costs associated with renewable energy technologies and energy-efficient systems. Dınçer argue that government subsidies play

a vital role in promoting investments in renewable energy technologies, particularly in sectors like healthcare, where the financial burden can be substantial [59]. Without adequate financial support, manufacturers may hesitate to invest in renewable technologies, fearing insufficient returns on investment.

Moreover, the effectiveness of existing subsidy programs can be undermined by bureaucratic inefficiencies and a lack of clarity in policy implementation. Xu emphasize that improving government funding mechanisms can enhance the innovative performance of renewable energy enterprises by providing the necessary financial support for research and development [60]. However, when subsidies are limited or poorly structured, they fail to stimulate significant advancements in technology adoption, leaving manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage.

Additionally, Luo highlight those regulatory incentives, such as investment subsidies and tax exemptions, are essential for motivating small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to adopt green manufacturing practices [61]. The absence of such incentives can create a barrier for SMEs, which often lack the capital to invest in renewable energy solutions independently. This situation is further exacerbated in regions where energy markets are volatile, as manufacturers may be reluctant to invest in technologies that do not have guaranteed financial backing.

## 3.4 Operational and Behavioural Issues

### 3.4.1 Skill Gaps

The challenge of skill gaps in the workforce significantly impedes the transition to ZEMFs. A shortage of trained personnel capable of designing, implementing, and maintaining these advanced systems can hinder the adoption of innovative technologies essential for achieving energy efficiency and sustainability. Adnan emphasizes that understanding and training in sustainability concepts are critical prerequisites for the successful introduction of sustainable practices in manufacturing [62]. Without a skilled workforce, companies may struggle to effectively implement energy-efficient technologies, leading to suboptimal performance and increased operational costs.

Moreover, traditional education and training methods often fail to equip students with the necessary skills for the rapidly evolving manufacturing landscape. Several literatures have pointed out that there is a
pressing need to complement conventional training approaches with modern methods that facilitate knowledge transfer and practical application in the context of Industry 4.0.

### 3.4.2 User Resistance

User resistance to adopting new practices or investing in innovative technologies is a significant barrier to achieving zero-energy manufacturing. Stakeholders, including management, employees, and investors, often exhibit hesitation due to concerns about the costs, risks, and uncertainties associated with transitioning to zero-energy practices. Otsuka notes that the manufacturing sector's energy demand is primarily influenced by efficiency efforts, suggesting that stakeholders may be reluctant to change established practices that have historically met their operational needs [63]. This resistance can stem from a lack of understanding of the benefits of zero-energy manufacturing or fear of the unknown, particularly regarding the implementation of new technologies.

Moreover, Tuo highlights that explicit emissions from various sectors contribute significantly to energy-related pollution, which underscores the urgency for change [64]. However, stakeholders may resist adopting new technologies that could disrupt existing workflows or require retraining. Akil emphasizes that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often face additional barriers, as they may lack the resources to invest in new technologies and may be more risk-averse compared to larger firms [65]. This hesitance can lead to stagnation in innovation and a failure to capitalize on potential energy savings and environmental benefits.

Furthermore, the perception of high upfront costs associated with renewable energy technologies can deter stakeholders from making necessary investments. Ingeli and Čekon discuss how the initial financial outlay for implementing zero-energy concepts can be a significant hurdle, particularly when the return on investment is not immediately apparent [66]. This financial apprehension can exacerbate user resistance, as stakeholders may prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability goals.

## 4. Case Studies and Practical Examples

### 4.1 Success Stories

Several facilities worldwide exemplify successful implementations of ZEMF, showcasing innovative design principles and operational strategies that contribute to sustainability. One prominent example is the Tesla Gigafactory, which integrates renewable energy generation with efficient design to achieve

near-zero energy status. The Gigafactory utilizes a combination of solar panels and energy storage systems to meet its energy needs, significantly reducing its carbon footprint while enhancing production efficiency [67].

The design of the Tesla Gigafactory emphasizes sustainability through its architectural layout and operational practices. According to Mawson and Hughes effective thermal modelling of manufacturing processes and HVAC systems is crucial for optimizing energy flows within such facilities [5]. The Gigafactory employs advanced energy management systems that monitor and control energy consumption in real-time, allowing for adjustments that maximize efficiency and minimize waste.

Another notable example is the Net Zero Energy Residential Test Facility developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). This facility serves as a research platform to explore energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy systems, demonstrating that it is possible to achieve a net-zero energy balance through careful design and integration of various energy sources. The facility's design incorporates passive solar heating, energy-efficient appliances, and a robust insulation system, which collectively contribute to its energy performance.

Moreover, the implementation of zero-energy principles in manufacturing is not limited to large-scale facilities. Smaller enterprises, such as certain food processing plants, have also adopted ZEMF strategies by utilizing local renewable energy sources and implementing energy-efficient technologies. These facilities often serve as case studies for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of zero-energy practices in diverse manufacturing contexts.

### 4.2 Lessons Learned

The analysis of successful examples in achieving ZEMFs reveals several common factors that contribute to their effectiveness. One of the most critical lessons learned is the early integration of energy goals during the design phase. This proactive approach allows for the incorporation of energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy systems from the outset, ensuring that the facility operates at optimal energy performance from day one. For instance, the Tesla Gigafactory exemplifies this principle by embedding energy generation capabilities, such as solar panels, into its design, thereby achieving significant energy savings and reducing reliance on external energy sources.
Collaboration among stakeholders is another vital factor identified in successful ZEMF implementations. Effective communication and cooperation between architects, engineers, manufacturers, and energy providers facilitate the sharing of knowledge and resources, leading to innovative solutions that enhance energy efficiency. Pawanr emphasized that cross-disciplinary collaboration can lead to the development of empirical models that optimize energy consumption in manufacturing processes, thereby contributing to the overall sustainability of the facility. This collaborative spirit is essential for addressing the multifaceted challenges associated with zero-energy goals, as it fosters a culture of innovation and shared responsibility [7].

Investment in advanced technologies also plays a crucial role in the success of ZEMFs. Facilities that prioritize the adoption of cutting-edge technologies, such as smart energy management systems and energy-efficient machinery, can significantly reduce their energy consumption and carbon footprint. Nwamekwe highlighted the importance of integrating renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, into building designs to achieve net-zero energy status [68]. By leveraging these technologies, manufacturers can not only meet their energy needs sustainably but also position themselves as leaders in the transition to a low-carbon economy.

### 4.3 Comparison with Conventional Facilities

The comparison between ZEMFs and conventional manufacturing facilities highlights several advantages of ZEMFs, including superior energy efficiency, reduced carbon footprint, and improved long-term profitability. However, challenges remain in scalability and affordability, which must be addressed to facilitate broader adoption.

ZEMFs are designed to minimize energy consumption and maximize the use of renewable energy sources. This is achieved through advanced design principles that incorporate energy-efficient technologies and systems. For instance, Egelman emphasized the importance of integrating energy goals early in the design process, which allows for the optimization of energy flows and the implementation of sustainable practices from the outset [69]. In contrast, conventional facilities often retrofit energy-efficient technologies, which can lead to inefficiencies and higher costs.

Moreover, ZEMFs typically exhibit a significantly lower carbon footprint compared to traditional

facilities. This reduction is primarily due to their reliance on renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, which are integrated into the facility's operations. Ezzati highlighted that the adoption of renewable energy not only mitigates greenhouse gas emissions but also enhances the resilience of manufacturing operations against energy price volatility [70]. In contrast, conventional facilities that depend on fossil fuels are subject to fluctuating energy costs and regulatory pressures related to emissions. In terms of long-term profitability, ZEMFs can offer substantial savings on energy costs, which can offset the initial investment in advanced technologies. Mawson and Hughes point out that while the upfront costs of implementing energy-efficient systems can be high, the operational savings realized over time can lead to improved financial performance [5]. This contrasts with conventional facilities, where ongoing energy expenses can significantly erode profit margins.

Despite these advantages, challenges remain in scaling ZEMFs and making them affordable for a broader range of manufacturers. The initial capital investment required for advanced technologies and renewable energy systems can be a barrier, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that may lack the financial resources to undertake such projects. Kim suggested that government incentives and subsidies can play a crucial role in bridging this gap, making it easier for SMEs to invest in ZEMFs [71].

## 5. Future Directions and Research Opportunities

### 5.1 Innovations in Design and Technology

The future directions and research opportunities in achieving zero-energy manufacturing facilities (ZEMFs) are increasingly intertwined with innovations in design and technology, particularly through the use of emerging tools such as digital twins and artificial intelligence (AI). These technologies offer significant potential for predictive energy management and enhanced optimization, which are critical for the successful implementation of ZEMFs.

Digital twins, which are virtual replicas of physical systems, enable manufacturers to simulate and analyse energy flows and operational efficiencies in real-time. By leveraging data from sensors and IoT devices, digital twins can provide insights into energy consumption patterns and identify opportunities for optimization. Xia highlighted that the integration of machine vision systems with digital twins can facilitate a deeper understanding of manufacturing events, thereby enhancing decision-making processes
related to energy management [72]. This capability
allows for proactive adjustments to be made in
manufacturing processes, ultimately leading to
reduced energy waste and improved sustainability.

Artificial intelligence further complements the
capabilities of digital twins by enabling advanced data
analytics and machine learning algorithms that can
predict energy demands and optimize resource
allocation. Liu demonstrate that AI can significantly
improve energy efficiency in manufacturing by
analysing historical data and identifying trends that
inform operational adjustments [41]. The application
of AI in energy management systems allows for
dynamic responses to changing production needs,
ensuring that energy use is minimized while
maintaining productivity.

Moreover, the convergence of AI and digital twins
presents opportunities for the development of smart
manufacturing systems that can autonomously
manage energy resources. As noted by Clauberg, the
challenges posed by digitalization and AI require a
rethinking of traditional manufacturing paradigms,
emphasizing the need for a skilled workforce capable
of leveraging these technologies effectively [73]. This
shift not only enhances operational efficiency but also
contributes to the broader goals of sustainability and
resilience in manufacturing.

## 5.2 Policy and Economic Frameworks

To facilitate the transition to ZEMFs, policymakers
must develop consistent regulations and provide
financial incentives that effectively reduce barriers for
manufacturers. The establishment of a supportive
policy and economic framework is essential for
promoting sustainable manufacturing practices and
encouraging investment in renewable energy
technologies.

One of the primary challenges in achieving ZEMFs is
the inconsistency of regulations across different
regions and sectors. Abdul-Rashid emphasized that a
coherent regulatory framework is crucial for guiding
manufacturers toward sustainable practices and
ensuring compliance with environmental standards
[74]. Without clear and consistent regulations,
manufacturers may face uncertainty, which can deter
investment in energy-efficient technologies.
Policymakers should aim to create a unified set of
standards that facilitate the adoption of sustainable
practices while providing clear guidelines for
compliance.

Financial incentives play a pivotal role in encouraging manufacturers to invest in ZEMFs. These incentives can take various forms, including tax credits, grants, and subsidies for renewable energy projects. Ocampo argued that financial support mechanisms are vital for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which often lack the capital to invest in advanced technologies [75]. By providing targeted financial incentives, governments can lower the initial investment barrier and promote the widespread adoption of zero-energy practices.

Moreover, the integration of sustainability into
manufacturing strategies requires a comprehensive
approach that considers the economic, environmental,
and social dimensions of production. Alayón highlight
that successful sustainable manufacturing practices
are often sector-specific, with certain industries, such
as automotive and metalworking, demonstrating more
proactive sustainability efforts due to their higher
environmental impact [76]. Policymakers should
tailor incentives and regulations to address the unique
challenges and opportunities within different sectors,
ensuring that the support provided aligns with industry
needs.

Furthermore, regulatory compliance is closely linked
to environmental sustainability practices. Sendawula
found that adherence to regulations enhances green
development and encourages manufacturers to adopt
sustainable practices [77]. Therefore, establishing a
robust regulatory framework that incentivizes
compliance can drive the transition toward ZEMFs.

## 5.3 Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Interdisciplinary collaboration among architects,
engineers, and policymakers is critical for advancing
the development of ZEMFs and overcoming the
inherent implementation challenges. The complexity
of ZEMFs necessitates a holistic approach that
integrates diverse expertise and perspectives to
achieve optimal energy performance and
sustainability.

One of the key benefits of interdisciplinary
collaboration is the ability to leverage synergies
between different sectors. For instance, Li discussed
the importance of spatial co-location of green
industries, which can enhance resource sharing and
infrastructure efficiency, thereby facilitating the
transition to net-zero manufacturing [6]. By fostering
partnerships between various stakeholders, including
those in the plastics, textiles, and automotive sectors,
policymakers can create industrial clusters that
promote sustainable practices and reduce overall
emissions.

Moreover, the integration of advanced technologies
into ZEMFs requires close cooperation between
engineers and architects. Gao emphasized that the
fundamentals of atomic and close-to-atomic scale
manufacturing can significantly enhance precision
and efficiency in production processes [42]. This
necessitates a collaborative design approach that
incorporates insights from both fields to ensure that
energy-efficient technologies are seamlessly
integrated into the manufacturing environment.

In addition, effective policymaking is essential for
creating a supportive regulatory framework that
encourages innovation and investment in ZEMFs.
Kang highlighted the need for consistent standards
and regulations that align with the goals of nearly
zero-energy buildings (NZEBs) [78]. Policymakers
must engage with industry experts to develop
regulations that not only promote energy efficiency
but also facilitate the adoption of new technologies
and practices within the manufacturing sector.

Furthermore, the role of digital tools and data
 analytics in ZEMF development cannot be overstated.
Ueda et al. point out that intelligent process planning
and control can optimize energy use in manufacturing
through real-time data analysis and feedback loops
[79]. This requires collaboration among IT
professionals, engineers, and manufacturing experts to
develop integrated systems that enhance operational
efficiency and sustainability.

6. Conclusion

**6.1. Summary of Key Findings**

This research underscores the pivotal role of
architectural and engineering design principles in
realizing ZEMFs. Key findings emphasize that
achieving ZEMFs requires a synergistic integration of
energy-efficient materials, passive design strategies,
and renewable energy systems, coupled with a
conscientious selection of suitable sites. The outlined
principles provide a robust foundation for designing
manufacturing facilities that minimize energy
consumption while ensuring operational efficiency
and sustainability.

Despite these advancements, the journey toward
widespread adoption of ZEMFs is fraught with
challenges. Technological barriers, such as limitations
in renewable energy storage and integration with
manufacturing operations, continue to impede
progress. Economic considerations, including high

initial investment costs and the uncertain return on
investment, create additional hurdles. Policy and
regulatory landscapes remain fragmented, with
insufficient incentives to drive adoption at scale.
Furthermore, operational challenges, such as
maintaining system reliability and integrating
advanced energy management systems, demand
innovative solutions to ensure seamless functionality
in ZEMFs.

**6.2. Energy Consumption Savings**

This study highlighted energy savings of up to 20% specifically related to cooling costs through reflective roofing materials.
Additionally, this study positioned that facilities equipped with advanced Energy Management Systems (EMS) can achieve energy savings of up to 30% compared to traditional energy management practices.

**6.3. Implications for Industry and Research**

The design of ZEMFs represents a significant step
towards sustainable industrial practices, where energy
efficiency, renewable energy integration, and
advanced building technologies converge to create
self-sustaining operations. From the architectural and
engineering design principles discussed in this
research, it is clear that achieving ZEMFs requires the
use of energy-efficient materials, the incorporation of
passive design strategies, and meticulous site selection
to optimize the natural environment. Moreover,
renewable energy systems such as solar panels, wind
turbines, and energy storage solutions are central to
the feasibility of ZEMFs, highlighting the importance
of a multidisciplinary approach involving
architecture, engineering, and renewable energy
systems.

However, the transition to ZEMFs is not without its
challenges. The primary barriers identified include the
high initial capital investment, the complexity of
integrating various energy systems, and the need for
advanced technologies to ensure operational
efficiency. Moreover, the long-term sustainability of
such facilities is dependent on the maintenance and
optimization of energy systems, which requires a shift
in industrial practices and a commitment to
continuous innovation. Additionally, achieving zero-
energy performance demands the collaboration of
various stakeholders, including government agencies,
private sector players, and research institutions, to
create policies and incentives that support the
transition.
Implications for industry and research are far-reaching. Industries must embrace new design paradigms and invest in cutting-edge technologies to meet the increasing demand for energy-efficient manufacturing processes. For researchers, the challenges of designing ZEMFs present numerous opportunities for advancing knowledge in energy systems integration, sustainable materials, and performance modelling. A holistic approach that brings together knowledge from multiple disciplines will be crucial to overcoming these challenges and ensuring the scalability of ZEMFs across different industrial sectors.

## References

[1]. Hsu, C. (2023). A survey on recent applications of artificial intelligence and optimization for smart grids in smart manufacturing. Energies, 16(22), 7660. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16227660

[2]. Wang, L., Luo, T., Shao, T., & Ji, G. (2023). Reverse passive strategy exploration for building massing design-an optimization-aided approach. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 21(3), 445-461. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771231177514

[3]. Islam, M., Rahman, M., Heidari, F., & Gude, V. (2021). Optimal onsite microgrid design for net-zero energy operation in manufacturing industry. Procedia Computer Science, 185, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.05.009

[4]. Tristán, A., Heuberger, F., & Sauer, A. (2020). A methodology to systematically identify and characterize energy flexibility measures in industrial systems. Energies, 13(22), 5887. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225887

[5]. Mawson, V. and Hughes, B. (2020). Thermal modelling of manufacturing processes and HVAC systems. Energy, 204, 117984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117984

[6]. Nwamekwe C., and Nwabunwanne E. (2025). Circular Economy and Zero-Energy Factories: A Synergistic Approach to Sustainable Manufacturing. Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JREAS), 10(1), 829-835. https://qtanalytics.in/journals/index.php/JREAS/article/view/4567

[7]. Pawanr, S., Garg, G., & Routroy, S. (2021). Development of an empirical model for variable power consumption machining processes: a case of end facing. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 47(7), 8273-8284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06198-y

[8]. Ringen, G. (2022). Value chain data integrity and quality – a case study. Incose International

Ultimately, this research underscores that the path to ZEMFs requires a collaborative, innovative, and sustainable approach that balances technological advancements with practical implementation, offering significant opportunities for environmental and economic benefits in the manufacturing sector.

## Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the efforts of the management of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Akwa in stimulating this research.

Symposium, 32(S2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.12899

[9]. Ghadimi, P., Mousavi, S., Wen, L., Kara, S., & Kornfeld, B. (2016). A combined approach for production parameter selection and on-site energy supply management in manufacturing industry. Modern Applied Science, 10(8), 230. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v10n8p230

[10]. Baumers, M., Tuck, C., Wildman, R., Ashcroft, I., Rosamond, E., & Hague, R. (2012). Transparency built-in. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17(3), 418-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00512.x

[11]. Assia, S., Ikram, E., Barkany, A., Darcherif, M., & Ahmed, E. (2020). Speed scaling technique integrated in scheduling of production and maintenance under energy constraints using genetic algorithms. E3s Web of Conferences, 170, 01029. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017001029

[12]. Zhu, W. and Liu, T. (2019). A novel multi-objective scheduling method for energy based unrelated parallel machines with auxiliary resource constraints. Ieee Access, 7, 168688-168699. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2954601

[13]. Kraus, M. and Kubečková, D. (2014). Analysis of the building materials in the energy efficient buildings. Advanced Materials Research, 1041, 3-6. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1041.3

[14]. Sheina, S. (2023). Energy-efficient construction materials in capital repair of apartment buildings (on the example of rostov-on-don). E3s Web of Conferences, 460, 10026. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346010026

[15]. Geissler, S., Österreicher, D., & Macharm, E. (2018). Transition towards energy efficiency: developing the Nigerian building energy efficiency code. Sustainability, 10(8), 2620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082620
[16]. Getun, G., Botvinovska, S., Kozak, N., Zapryvoda, A., & Sulimenko, H. (2019). Envelope life cycle costing of energy-efficient buildings in ukraine. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(10), 2314-2321.
https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.j1309.0881019

[17]. Ndujiuba, F., Taiwo, A., Oladigbolu, E., & Okon, E. (2022). Optimization strategy for energy-efficiency in institutional building: a case study of bells university, ota. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology, 06(08), 79-91.
https://doi.org/10.47001/irjiet/2022.608011

[18]. Yilmaz, İ. (2020). A techno-economic comparative study for wood and other building materials in terms of energy efficiency.
https://doi.org/10.3342/6th.steconf.2020.09.203

[19]. Namin, A., Eckelman, M., & Isaacs, J. (2023). Technical feasibility of powering u.s. manufacturing with rooftop solar PV. Environmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability, 3(1), 011002.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/acb5bf

[20]. Agha, M., Théry, R., Hétreux, G., Haït, A., & Lann, J. (2010). Integrated production and utility system approach for optimizing industrial unit operations. Energy, 35(2), 611-627.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.10.032

[21]. Karimi, S. and Kwon, S. (2021). Comparative analysis of the impact of energy-aware scheduling, renewable energy generation, and battery energy storage on production scheduling. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(13), 18981-18998.
https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6999

[22]. Jabeur, M. (2023). Sustainable production scheduling with on-site intermittent renewable energy and demand-side management: a feed-animal case study. Energies, 16(14), 5433.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16145433

[23]. Macarulla, M., Casals, M., Forcada, N., & Gangolells, M. (2017). Implementation of predictive control in a commercial building energy management system using neural networks. Energy and Buildings, 151, 511-519.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.027

[24]. Brooks, J., Goyal, S., Subramany, R., Lin, Y., Liao, C., Middelkoop, T., ... & Barooah, P. (2015). Experimental evaluation of occupancy-based energy-efficient climate control of vav terminal units. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 21(4), 469-480.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2015.1023162

[25]. Fonseca, P., Moura, P., Jorge, H., & Almeida, A. (2018). Sustainability in university campus: options for achieving nearly zero energy goals. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher

Education, 19(4), 790-816.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-09-2017-0145

[26]. Hunt, J., Nascimento, A., Zakeri, B., Jurasz, J., Dąbek, P., Barbosa, P., ... & Filho, W. (2022). Lift energy storage technology: a solution for decentralized urban energy storage. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4032342

[27]. Saarloos, B. and Quinn, J. (2021). Net-zero energy districts and the grid: an energy-economic feasibility case-study of the national western centre in Denver, co, USA. Buildings, 11(12), 638.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120638

[28]. Georgiou, G., Nikolaidis, P., Kalogirou, S., & Christodoulides, P. (2020). A hybrid optimization approach for autonomy enhancement of nearly-zero-energy buildings based on battery performance and artificial neural networks. Energies, 13(14), 3680.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143680

[29]. Bruno, S., Dicorato, M., Scala, M., Sbrizzai, R., Lombardi, P., & Arendarski, B. (2019). Optimal sizing and operation of electric and thermal storage in a net zero multi energy system. Energies, 12(17), 3389.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173389

[30]. Fuentes, J. (2023). Technical and economic viability of underground hydrogen storage. Hydrogen, 4(4), 975-1001.
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen4040057

[31]. Zhao, L., Zhang, W., & Wang, W. (2022). Bim-based multi-objective optimization of low-carbon and energy-saving buildings. Sustainability, 14(20), 13064.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013064

[32]. Jorissen, F., Boydens, W., & Helsen, L. (2018). Taco, an automated toolchain for model predictive control of building systems: implementation and verification. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 12(2), 180-192.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2018.1498537

[33]. R.Kennady, E. (2023). Optimising solar energy integration for efficient electric vehicle charging via intelligent shading charging systems. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(4), 440-446.
https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i4.9856

[34]. Mittal, S., Khan, M., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2017). Smart manufacturing: characteristics, technologies and enabling factors. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 233(5), 1342-1361.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405417736547

[35]. Medić, N., Anišić, Z., Tasić, N., Zivlak, N., & Lalić, B. (2020). Technology adoption in the industry 4.0 era: empirical evidence from manufacturing companies.. 115-122.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_14
[36]. Moseley, P. (2017). Eu support for innovation and market uptake in smart buildings under the horizon 2020 framework programme. Buildings, 7(4), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7040105

[37]. Nwamekwe, C. O., Ewuzie, N. V., Igbokwe, N. C., U-Dominic, C. M., and Nwabueze, C. V. (2024). Adoption of Smart Factories in Nigeria: Problems, Obstacles, Remedies and Opportunities. International Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 2(2). Retrieved from https://journals.unizik.edu.ng/ijipe/article/view/4167

[38]. Melnyk, L., Kalinichenko, L., Kubatko, O., Dobrowolski, Z., & Babczuk, A. (2023). Restructuring the economic systems on the way to an additive economy. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(3), 230-243. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(3).2023.18

[39]. Krugh, M. and Mears, L. (2018). A complementary cyber-human systems framework for industry 4.0 cyber-physical systems. Manufacturing Letters, 15, 89-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.01.003

[40]. Zhang, C. and Ji, W. (2020). Edge computing enabled production anomalies detection and energy-efficient production decision approach for discrete manufacturing workshops. IEEE Access, 8, 158197-158207. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3020136

[41]. Liu, T., Nakajima, T., & Hamori, S. (2021). The impact of economic uncertainty caused by covid-19 on renewable energy stocks. Empirical Economics, 62(4), 1495-1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02087-3

[42]. Gao, J., Luo, X., Fan, P., & Sun, J. (2021). Fundamentals of atomic and close-to-atomic scale manufacturing: a review. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 4(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ac3bb2

[43]. Nwamekwe C. O., and Okpala C. C. (2025). Circular economy strategies in industrial engineering: From theory to practice. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 6(1), 1773-1782. https://www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com/uploads/archives/20250212103754_MGE-2025-1-288.1.pdf

[44]. Rekioua, D. (2023). Optimization and intelligent power management control for an autonomous hybrid wind turbine photovoltaic diesel generator with batteries. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49067-4

[45]. Vavrík, V., Fusko, M., Bučková, M., Gašo, M., Krajčovič, M., & Štaffenová, K. (2022). Designing of machine backups in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Applied Sciences, 12(5), 2338. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052338

[46]. Mingolla, S. (2024). Towards sustainable fertilizer production: cost comparison of flexible and continuous electrolytic ammonia production. https://doi.org/10.46855/energy-proceedings-10982

[47]. Kozlova, M. and Lohrmann, A. (2021). Steering renewable energy investments in favor of energy system reliability: a call for a hybrid model. Sustainability, 13(24), 13510. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413510

[48]. Panda, D. and Das, S. (2021). Smart grid architecture model for control, optimization and data analytics of future power networks with more renewable energy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 301, 126877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126877

[49]. Radoglou-Grammatikis, P. and Sarigiannidis, P. (2019). Securing the smart grid: a comprehensive compilation of intrusion detection and prevention systems. IEEE Access, 7, 46595-46620. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2909807

[50]. Bernsmed, K., Jaatun, M., & Frøystad, C. (2019). Is a smarter grid also riskier? 36-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31511-5_3

[51]. Bistline, J., Hodson, E., Rossmann, C., Creason, J., Murray, B., & Barron, A. (2018). Electric sector policy, technological change, and U.S. emissions reductions goals: results from the emf 32 model intercomparison project. Energy Economics, 73, 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.012

[52]. Fernández, C. (2024). Achieving decentralized, electrified, and decarbonized ammonia production. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(16), 6964-6977. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c10751

[53]. Karali, N., Park, W., & McNeil, M. (2017). Modelling technological change and its impact on energy savings in the u.s. iron and steel sector. Applied Energy, 202, 447-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.173

[54]. Gazheli, A. and Bergh, J. (2018). Real options analysis of investment in solar vs. wind energy: diversification strategies under uncertain prices and costs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 2693-2704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.096

[55]. Chen, Y. (2024). The impact of interest rate uncertainty on renewable energy investments: compared with conventional energy investments. Applied and Computational Engineering, 60(1), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/60/20240840

[56]. Chronopoulos, M., Hagspiel, V., & Fleten, S. (2016). Stepwise green investment under policy uncertainty. The Energy Journal, 37(4), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.4.mchr
[57]. Olatunde, T. (2024). Review of energy-efficient hvac technologies for sustainable buildings. International Journal of Science and Technology Research Archive, 6(2), 012-020. https://doi.org/10.53771/ijstra.2024.6.2.0039

[58]. Timmermans, S. and Epstein, S. (2010). A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629

[59]. Dınçer, H., Eti, S., Yüksel, S., Gökalp, Y., & Celebi, B. (2023). Strategy generation for risk minimization of renewable energy technology investments in hospitals with sf top-dematel methodology. Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering, 3(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewjcce32021141

[60]. Xu, X., Chen, X., Xu, Y., Wang, T., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Improving the innovative performance of renewable energy enterprises in China: effects of subsidy policy and intellectual property legislation. Sustainability, 14(13), 8169. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138169

[61]. Luo, Y., Jie, X., Li, X., & Yao, L. (2018). Ranking Chinese SMEs green manufacturing drivers using a novel hybrid multi-criterion decision-making model. Sustainability, 10(8), 2661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082661

[62]. Adnan, Q. (2023). IoT implementation framework to support industry 4.0 in the Malaysian manufacturing industries: a systematic review. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 14(1), 875-888. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/140168

[63]. Otsuka, A. (2016). Regional energy demand in Japan: dynamic shift-share analysis. Energy Sustainability and Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-016-0076-x

[64]. Tuo, S., Chang, L., Brou, E., Kassi, D., & Gnangoin, Y. (2022). Estimating the carbon dioxide emission levels of g7 countries: a count data approach. Energy & Environment, 35(4), 1753-1772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x221143416

[65]. Akil, Y., Miyauchi, H., Mangngenre, S., & Amar, K. (2020). Perceptions and determinants of SMEs consumers' behaviours for electricity saving: evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(3), 168-174. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.9055

[66]. Ingeli, R. and Čekon, M. (2016). Analysis of energy consumption in building with nzeb concept. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 824, 347-354. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.824.347

[67]. Esmaeili, A., McGuire, C., Overcash, M., Ali, K., Soltani, S., & Twomey, J. (2018). Environmental impact reduction as a new dimension for quality measurement of healthcare services. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 31(8), 910-922. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-10-2016-0153

[68]. Nwamekwe, C. O., Ewuzie, N. V., Igbokwe, N. C., Okpala, C. C., & U-Dominic, C. M. (2024). Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in Nigeria: Optimization and Implementation Appraisal. Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 9(3). https://qtanalytics.in/journals/index.php/JREAS/article/view/3967

[69]. Egelman, C., Epple, D., Argote, L., & Fuchs, E. (2017). Learning by doing in multiproduct manufacturing: variety, customizations, and overlapping product generations. Management Science, 63(2), 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2352

[70]. Ezzati, F., Mosadeghrad, A., & Pooyan, E. (2022). The health organization resilience in covid-19 pandemic. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1234494/v1

[71]. Kim, J., Kim, H., & Kim, J. (2015). Analysis of photovoltaic applications in zero energy building cases of iea shc/ebc task 40/annex 52. Sustainability, 7(7), 8782-8800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078782

[72]. Xia, K., Saidy, C., Kirkpatrick, M., Anumbe, N., Sheth, A., & Harik, R. (2021). Towards semantic integration of machine vision systems to aid manufacturing event understanding. Sensors, 21(13), 4276. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21134276

[73]. Clauberg, R. (2020). Challenges of digitalization and artificial intelligence for modern economies, societies and management. Rudn Journal of Economics, 28(3), 556-567. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2020-28-3-556-567

[74]. Abdul-Rashid, S., Sakundarini, N., Ghazilla, R., and Ramayah, T. (2017). The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(2), 182-204. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-04-2015-0223

[75]. Ocampo, L., Clark, E., & Tanudtanud, K. (2015). Structural decisions of sustainable manufacturing strategy with fuzzy analytic network process (fanp). International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences, 6(2), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsds.2015040102

[76]. Alayón, C., Säfsten, K., & Johansson, G. (2017). Conceptual sustainable production principles in practice: do they reflect what companies do?
Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 693-701.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.079

[77]. Sendawula, K., Turyakira, P., Ikiror, C., & Bagire, V. (2021). Regulatory compliance and environmental sustainability practices of manufacturing entrepreneurial ventures in Uganda. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 62-74.
https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-08-2020-0122

[78]. Kang, Y., Wu, J., Rui-jie, L., He, L., Yu, Z., & Yang, Y. (2020). Handshaking towards zero-concept analysis and technical measures of leed zero-energy building in connection with technical standard of nearly zero-energy building in China. Energy

Exploration & Exploitation, 39(2), 669-689.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598720923149

[79]. Ueda, M., Carter, D., Yamazaki, K., & Kakinuma, Y. (2020). Intelligent process planning and control of ded (directed energy deposition) for rapid manufacturing. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design Systems and Manufacturing, 14(1), JAMDSM0015-JAMDSM0015.
https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2020jamdsm0015

[80]. Yakovenko, Y. (2024). Study of digital twins as the driving force of digital transformation and achieving the goals of sustainable development. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(4(76)), 11-20.
https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2024.301423