# Boot camp approach to surgical residency preparation: feedback from a French university hospital

Etienne Buscail, Fabrice Muscari, Aurélien Hostalrich, Manon Bolzinger, Sandra Malavaud, Vincent Minville, Charlotte Martin, Magali Delhoste, Charles Henri Houze-Cerfon, Simon Buscail, et al.

► To cite this version:

Etienne Buscail, Fabrice Muscari, Aurélien Hostalrich, Manon Bolzinger, Sandra Malavaud, et al. Boot camp approach to surgical residency preparation: feedback from a French university hospital. BMC Medical Education, 2022, 22 (1), 9 p. 10.1186/s12909-022-03745-5. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03745-5

HAL Id: hal-03795857

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03795857

Submitted on 4 Oct 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
RESEARCH

Open Access

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for
updates

# Boot camp approach to surgical residency preparation: feedback from a French university hospital

Etienne Buscail<fnref n="1" />,²,³*, Fabrice Muscari<fnref n="1" />, Aurélien Hostalrich⁴, Manon Bolzinger⁵, Sandra Malavaud⁶, Vincent Minville⁷, Charlotte Martin⁷, Magali Delhoste<fnref n="1" />, Charles Henri Houze-Cerfon⁸, Simon Buscail⁹, Bruno Bastiani¹⁰, Mathieu Roumiguié¹¹, Ariane Weyl¹², Nicolas Carrère<fnref n="1" />† and Olivier Abbo⁵†

**Abstract**

**Introduction:** The transition from medical student to surgical resident is not a simple one. The aim of this study was to report the experience of a university hospital in the organization of the induction course for future surgical residents and the contribution of a video support in the learning of the suture.

**Material and method:** We were able to study two consecutive years of students (October 2020 and 2021). Concerning the practical and technical workshops (learning suture) we carried out a comparative study between two groups of students. A group that had video support for learning suture (video group) and a group without video (control group). The evaluation of the suture was performed in a blinded manner by two supervising surgeons. The other practical workshop was drain fixation; the students did not have a video for this workshop. A comparative study was also performed for the drain fixation workshop between the two groups (video group and control group). A program of theoretical courses was also set up. This program is established according to the different future functions of the residents by integrating medico-legal notions and teamwork. Satisfaction questionnaires were given to the students and the answers were given two months after taking up their duties in the hospital (6 questions with Likert scale and 4 free questions).

**Results:** The cohort consisted of 58 students (29 each in 2020 and 29 in 2021). Comparative analyses of the evaluation of the suture workshops showed better performance in the video group compared with the group without video. The comparison of these two groups did not show significant differences in the drain fixation workshop. The theoretical teaching was broken down according to the students' future tasks and each speaker was a specialist in his or her field of expertise. The results of the questionnaires showed a desire on the part of the students to increase the time spent on practical workshops and theoretical forensic teaching.

**Conclusion:** We were able to show through these two years of a program that we were able to offer a surgical resident preparation course. In addition, we have highlighted the contribution of a video support in the learning curve of the suture.

<footnote>†Nicolas Carrère and Olivier Abbo contributed equally to this work.</footnote>

<footnote>*Correspondence: ebuscail@me.com</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ Department of Digestive Surgery, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article</footnote>
**Keywords:** Education, Surgery, Video-based learning, Surgical residency program in France, Surgical skills, Curriculum design, Medical student education, Preparedness surgical residency

**Introduction**

The transition from graduate medical school to residency is often considered the most difficult transition by students and supervisors [1]. The goals of residency are to adequately perform their new clinical role, integrate into a healthcare team, and integrate their new responsibilities from day one [1]. In specialties that include a technical platform and skills such as surgical specialties, additional adaptation is required. However, despite the identification of these difficulties, the data show that students and future residents feel "underprepared" [1–3]. This phenomenon is well described in North America, particularly in Canada where it is called the "July phenomenon", and is even accompanied by a significant decrease in the efficiency of care in certain departments [4]. The purpose of such an induction program is to bridge the gap between the graduate level [5], where students are learners, and the resident level, which is a dual status of practitioner and learner (Fig. 1). The reform of the third cycle of medical studies in France now implies early choice and orientation in the specialist model requiring rapid adaptation to the student’s future surgical specialization [6]. The goal of the boot camp for future surgical residents is to introduce and prepare for technical aspects and notions related to the role and objectives of the basic phase of surgical residency. The effect of COVID-19 on medical education has led to the replacement of in-person learning with virtual experiences [7]. Thus, health restrictions and constraints have led us to reorganize to minimize the impact on students of the decrease in face-to-face teaching [8]. The aim of this study is to present the results of the seminar program at the Toulouse University Hospital. Within this program we have included

the evaluation of the contribution of video support in the learning of suturing through a comparative study.

**Material and methods**

**Location and context of the boot camp**

The boot camp for future surgical residents in Toulouse (so called “SAICT”) takes place the week before the beginning of the first internship in a surgical department and must be attended after a specialty is chosen during the third week of September (September 18, 2020; September 17, 2021). The start of surgical residency in France takes place on November 1st and each internship lasts six months (e.g., from November to April or from May to October). For organizational and practical reasons, the workshops and classes are spread out over two days. The SAICT program is coordinated by three surgeons (two professors and one associate professor). Teaching is multi-disciplinary and includes the intervention of one or more members of the following teams: digestive surgery, pediatric surgery, vascular surgery, gynecologic surgery, the Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) team, the department of anesthesiology, the emergency department and a lawyer. The SAICT has access to the premises and infrastructures of the Toulouse Institute of Health Simulation (ITSIMS) on the Toulouse Purpan University Hospital site. The study population included all students who chose a surgical specialty available in the Toulouse University Hospital (Table 1).

**Skills station**

The skills stations include the first actions performed by the basic phase surgical intern. The goal of the practical workshops is to reproduce the different sequences

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Schematic representation of the roles of surgical residents</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 1** Student cohort</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Video group n = 30</th><th>Control group (without video) n = 28</th><th>p</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Suture experience</td><td>n = 30 (100%)</td><td>n = 27 (97%)</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td>Suture and knot simulation training course</td><td>n = 18 (60%)</td><td>n = 18 (65%)</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td>Gender—male n (%)</td><td>n = 12 (40%)</td><td>n = 12 (42%)</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td>Chosen specialty</td><td>ENT and maxillofacial surgery n = 7<br>Gynecology n = 6<br>Digestive surgery n = 2<br>Ophthalmology n = 6<br>Cardiovascular and thoracic surgery n = 2<br>Orthopedic surgery n = 5<br>Urology n = 2</td><td>ENT and maxillofacial surgery n = 8<br>Gynecology n = 6<br>Digestive surgery n = 2<br>Ophthalmology n = 4<br>Cardiovascular and thoracic surgery n = 2<br>Orthopedic surgery n = 4<br>Urology n = 2</td><td>ns</td></tr></tbody></table>

Abbreviation: ENT Ear nose and throat, ns not significant

and steps of patient management in the operating room (Table 2). These workshops are organized as follows:

- An IPC workshop focused on the prevention of surgical site infection supervised and taught by an IPC practitioner, which includes all the steps and rules of asepsis from the OR changing room to setting up sterile surgical drapes: surgical hand scrubbing, rules for setting up surgical drapes, rules for moving around the surgical theatre, skin preparation rules.

- A suture skill station supervised by the teaching surgical team. This step was comparative between two groups of students: a group with video support (Group A) one week before and another group without video support (Group B). A pre-test on the student's knowledge on theory is completed at the beginning of the seminar (Supplemental data 1). This workshop includes standardized evaluation of a suture using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) [9, 10] scale (Supplemental data 2). We incorporated video learning assessment using a comparative study with blinded evaluation. We created a didactic video on simple suturing and showed it to half of the cohort 3 days before the workshop. The other half did not view the video. Only one member of the teaching staff was informed of the student allocation. This team member did not participate in the theoretical and practical teaching activities. His role was to supervise the boot camp, he was not present during the suture workshops. Evaluation was performed by two members of the surgical teaching team in a blinded fashion. In case of disagreement on the evaluation, a third evaluator who was also blinded was called on. Students were randomly distributed

between the two groups according to the choice of future specialty so that the two groups would be comparable for this variable.

- A drain-fixing workshop with demonstration and theory teaching was included in the seminar course. There was no video teaching for this workshop. An evaluation was also performed for this procedure with two blinded evaluators, using the Muresan scale [11, 12] (Supplemental data 3). This evaluation was also comparative between the two groups (with video and without video). No specific video was given for this skill station. The groups previously described for the suture workshop were used for the comparative study.

## Theory courses

The theoretical part is organized into presentations of 1 h to 1 h 30 min for each session. The lessons are articulated according to the pedagogical objectives set for the SAICT. As for the skills station, each lesson is focused on taking up future functions and the tripodal operating room service of hospitalization and advice to the emergency services. The list of courses and the pedagogical objectives inherent to each are detailed in Table 2.

## Feedback from participants

At the end of the SAICT, feedback was collected from the learners. First, through a discussion with the supervisors and then in a standardized way via a questionnaire and a Likert scale which were sent to each student at the beginning of January, two months after the start of the course. The aim was to evaluate the SAICT and its efficiency in the context of new residents taking up their functions after one month of training.
<table><caption>**Table 2** List of SAICT boot camp skills station and lecture</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th>Operating room</th><th>Surgical hospitalization department</th><th>Emergency surgical advice</th><th>Lecture supervisor, teacher</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2">Hygiene and infection</td><td>Lecture series</td><td>- Bacteriology<br/>- Guidelines for sterilization, asepsis and good practice<br/>- Iatrogenic infections</td><td></td><td></td><td rowspan="2">Infectiology unit team member</td></tr><tr><td>Skills station</td><td>- Dry and wet scrubbing<br/>- Gown and glove<br/>- Moving around the table<br/>- Prep and drape (plastic dummy)</td><td>- Dry and wet scrubbing</td><td>- Dry and wet scrubbing</td></tr><tr><td>Anesthesia management</td><td>Lecture series</td><td>- Anesthetic care in the operating room<br/>- Communication between the surgeon and the anesthesiologist</td><td>- Team-based pain management<br/>- Communication between the surgeon and the anesthesiologist</td><td>- Emergency management as a team<br/>- Communication between the surgeon and the anesthesiologist</td><td>Anesthesiologist team member</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Handing over instruments and suture</td><td>Skills station</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td rowspan="2">- Surgical coordination team and teaching surgeon<br/>- Member of the operating room nursing team</td></tr><tr><td>Lecture series</td><td>- Basic knot tying and suture*<br/>- Deep knot tying and suture*<br/>- Different knot types<br/>- Instrument handling<br/>- Instrument name<br/>- Clamp-cut-tie-cut techniques</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Skills station</td><td>- Deep, superficial suture and knot on artificial skin</td><td></td><td></td><td>- Surgical coordination team and teaching surgeon</td></tr><tr><td>Drain fixation device</td><td>Lecture series</td><td>- Principles of surgical drain fixation<br/>- Principles of surgical drainage and main indications</td><td>- Drain management</td><td></td><td>- Surgical coordination team and teaching surgeon</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Skills station</td><td>- Fixation of a tubular drain (redon type) on an artificial support</td><td></td><td></td><td>- Surgical coordination team and teaching surgeon</td></tr><tr><td>Medical law and good practice</td><td>Lecture series</td><td>- Medical law and responsibility<br/>- Forensics rules for writing a hospitalization report and surgical report<br/>- Informed consent</td><td></td><td></td><td>- Lawyer member of the Toulouse Bar Association</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Team work and communication</td><td>Skills station</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td rowspan="2">- Surgical coordination team<br/>- Member of the operating room nursing team</td></tr><tr><td>Lecture series</td><td>- Presentation of the composition of an operating room team: roles and relationships<br/>- Duality of being a learner and practitioner</td><td>- Postoperative care with patient and family<br/>- Effective handover during transition in care</td><td>- Recognizing and initiating early management for critically ill surgical patient</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Skills station</td><td>Helium stick</td><td></td><td></td><td>- Surgical coordination team</td></tr></tbody></table>

**Statistical analysis**

The chi-2 test, Mann-Whitney test, and Fisher's exact test were used to analyze the demographics of the cohort. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare unpaired nonparametric data for analysis of initial and final test results for the drain fixation and suture workshops. Data were analyzed with standard statistical

tools using GraphPad-Prism 9.1.2 software (GraphPad Software Inc. San Diego, CA, USA).

**Results**

**Population**

The cohort included 58 students, 28 for the class of 2020 and 30 for the class of 2021 (details in the Table 1). There
was no significant difference between the two groups, particularly in terms of previous experience and/or suture training.

## SAICT's program

The program for the different and practical and theory courses is detailed in Table 2.

## Results of the practical suture and drain fixation workshop evaluation

- The pretest showed a significant difference in knowledge of procedural theory between the video and non-video groups. Knowledge of the procedure was significantly better in the video group. This result is explained by the fact that the students watched the video explaining the steps of the suture (Fig. 2A).

- The suture was evaluated on six items; each one was graded from 1 to 5. The evaluation form is detailed in supplemental data 2. The quality of the suture and of the actions was significantly better for the students in the "video" group (Fig. 2B).

- The drain fixation was evaluated on a 5-item scale of actions to take at each step (supplemental data 3). There was no significant difference between the video group and the group without a video. This evaluation was also performed blindly by a surgical examiner (Fig. 2C).

## Feedback and satisfaction questionnaire

A time for discussion was included in the SAICT. Additionally, all students filled out a questionnaire in the form of a Likert scale (Table 3). The results of this questionnaire are shown in Fig. 3 (regarding question B—only students in the video group responded). In addition, the students had four additional questions (not included in the Likert scale questionnaire):

1. Which hands-on workshop would you like to increase in length?

2. Which theory workshop would you like to increase in duration?

3. Which practical workshop would you like to add?

4. Which theory workshop would you like to add?

Regarding the four open-ended questions, the majority of requests were:

1. 0.46 (79%) students expressed their desire to increase the duration of the practical suture workshops.

2. 0.26 (44%) students wished to increase the duration of the lessons on suture theory and 24 (41%) those on medical law.

3. 0.48 (82%) students wanted more theory lessons on the names of instruments.

4. Concerning the addition of a practical workshop, the answers were disparate and most often correlated with the orientation chosen by the students (22 students wanted a workshop on the introduction to laparoscopy, 4 on thoracic drain placement, 8 on the preparation of a plaster cast and the principles of osteosynthesis, and the remaining 22 interns from brain specialties gave disparate answers).

## Discussion

Through our results and our two years of training we showed the optimization of training time as well as the adaptation to the sanitary constraints. In fact, the efficiency of the video support for sutures indicates that time for theory lessons on this subject can be reduced. Through this optimization, the time and number of skills stations and theory courses can be increased. The objective is always to prepare residents in the best possible way to take up their future functions [13]. The reform of the third cycle of medical studies in France now divides internship into three distinct parts: the foundation phase, the enhancement phase and the consolidation phase, each of which is spread out over two years, for a total of six years. During the foundation phase, resident must complete their practice in a tertiary center of their future specialty, which implies early specialization. The SAICT allows the introduction of more general notions of surgery such as the use of instruments or notions of medical law required for daily practice (e.g. writing prescriptions, medical observations, the notion of professional secrecy).

One of the first areas requiring change for future surgical residents is the operative and execution side of daily practice. This aspect is also a source of apprehension. Therefore, progressive learning in a safe environment seemed appropriate [14]. The construction of the motor pattern is an essential element in the development of future technical skills [12]. Our cohort suggests that watching a video on how to suture contributes significantly to learning. In fact, we found significant differences in all items of the OSATS [10]. One of the difficulties encountered during this SAICT project was related to the health constraints of the COVID 19 pandemic [15]. This constraint allowed us to establish and refine our method of learning how to suture through a video. This method proved to be effective and will allow us to save time and implement our theory teaching
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** Results of the evaluation of the practical workshops; A results of the pre-test; B results of suture skills station (OSATS scale); C results of the drain fixation workshop (MURESAN scale)</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 3** feedback questionnaire (Likert scale) regarding question B—only students in the video group responded</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Question A—Before the skills station did you identify your educational goal(s)?</td><td>1- Not at all</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>5- Very precisely</td></tr><tr><td>Question B—Was the video useful for the suture workshop?</td><td>1- Not useful at all</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>5- Very useful</td></tr><tr><td>Question C—Were the adjustments made by the supervisors on the use of the instruments useful at the beginning of your practice?</td><td>1- Not useful at all</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>5- Very useful</td></tr><tr><td>Question D—How much did the hands-on suture and drain fixation skills station help you in your early practice?</td><td>1- Not useful at all</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>5- Very useful</td></tr><tr><td>Question E—Did the presentations during the boot-camp answer your questions about the beginning of your practice?</td><td>1- Not at all</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>5- Very instructive</td></tr><tr><td>Question F—Overall, what is your impression of the boot-camp?</td><td>1- Not useful at all</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>5- Very useful</td></tr></tbody></table>

program through other lessons. The essential elements of this practical lesson are a debriefing stage by the supervisors [16], out-of-hospital boot camp and, above all, a preparation stage appears to be essential [1]. Debriefing was considered important here because this kind of process has already been proven to work in emergency situations and technical situation [17, 18]. Introducing debriefing concepts early in surgical training can help to establish a habit and adapt it for increasingly technical

procedures as the training progresses. The post-study Likert survey suggests that users appreciated the tool, feeling that it improved their early practice.

Concerning the follow-up and evolution of resident learning, it is integrated in the basic phase of the practical teaching in the form of a seminar every two months during the first year. These seminars allow the residents to give feedback on the technical procedures and to express any difficulties they may have in performing them. Our model and the changes in French residency teaching allow us to have a follow-up over the year [6]. This has the advantage of having feedback from all the students, especially on the Likert scales. On the learners' side, this allows an evolutive follow-up and adaptations of the SAICT each year according to the needs expressed by the residents during the SAICT and throughout the first year of practice. We can thereby follow residents in digestive, pediatric, gynecological, vascular and urological surgery by progressively integrating learning workshops, laparoscopic surgery and practical workshops in digestive and vascular anastomosis [19].

For the 2021 session, we also conducted a survey among the heads of the different surgical specialties in order to find out their expectations regarding the new interns taking up their duties in their departments, as well as their expectations, if any, regarding this seminar. We observed that the students were eager to increase the duration, the number and the type of practical sessions. To this end, the SAICT 2022 will be enhanced with an additional "more focused" day according to the various

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>
specialties. Future residents will be assigned to theory lessons and practical workshops according to their specialties. These days will be supervised by teachers of the respective specialties.

## Conclusion

The SAICT contains a wealth of new information concerning both theory and practice that future resident must acquire. In addition, we have highlighted the contribution of a video support in the learning curve of the suture. Based on the results of the SAICT, we were able to show that it is possible to organize an induction course that could cover the basic notions required by surgical residents before they take up their function. The SAICT will be implemented by consolidating the general bases common to all future residents, regardless of their specialty, as well as through targeted and specialized teaching provided by specialty teachers.

## Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03745-5.

### Additional file 1.

### Acknowledgements

Toulouse medical Simulation center (ITSIM).

### Competencies

Medical Knowledge, Professionalism, Interpersonal and Communication Skills.

### Authors' contributions

EB, OA conception, design, analysis, assembly and interpretation of data, manuscript writing; EB, OA collection and assembly of data, interpretation of data; EB, OA collection and assembly of data, interpretation of data; EB Statistical analyses; FM, AH, MB, MR, AW, SM, VM, CM, BB, MD, CHH, SB analysis and interpretation of data; FM design, analysis, assembly and interpretation of data; EB, OA and NC conception, design, analysis, interpretation of data, final approval of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

### Funding

There are no resources of funding to be reported or declared.

### Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

### Declarations

#### Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All participants gave informed consent to participate in the study via email and again verbally at the start of the interview. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. All study participants gave their written consent to take part, which they could withdraw at any time. The assessment protocol was approved by the institutional review board (French CNIL (Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés).

#### Consent for publication

Not applicable.

### Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

### Author details

¹Department of Digestive Surgery, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France. ²INSERM, U1220, University of Toulouse, Digestive Health Research Institute (IRSD), Toulouse, France. ³Department of Digestive Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, CHU Rangueil, 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France. ⁴Department of Vascular Surgery, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France. ⁵Department of Pediatric Surgery, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France. ⁶Department of Infection Control, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France. ⁷Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.

⁸Emergency Medical Service, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.

⁹The Toulouse Bar Association, Toulouse, France. ¹⁰Toulouse Institute for Health Stimulation, Toulouse, France. ¹¹Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France. ¹²Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.

Received: 17 April 2022 Accepted: 8 September 2022

Published online: 15 September 2022

### References

1. Perez AR, Boscardin CK, Pardo M. Residents' challenges in transitioning to residency and recommended strategies for improvement. J Educ Perioper Med JEPM. 2022;24:E679.

2. Atherley A, Dolmans D, Hu W, Hegazi I, Alexander S, Teunissen PW. Beyond the struggles: a scoping review on the transition to undergraduate clinical training. Med Educ. 2019;53:559-70.

3. Eskander J, Rajaguru PP, Greenberg PB. Evaluating wellness interventions for resident physicians: a systematic review. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13:58-69.

4. Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Moazed F, Caprio T, Didwania A, McGaghie WC, et al. Making July safer: simulation-based mastery learning during intern boot camp. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2013;88:233-9.

5. Young M, Lewis C, Kailavasan M, Satterthwaite L, Safir O, Tomlinson J, et al. A systematic review of methodological principles and delivery of surgical simulation bootcamps. Am J Surg. 2021;S0002-9610(21)00663-72.

6. Farges O, Bertolus C, Thomazeau H, Audry G, Kreitmann B, Favre JP, et al. Reform of the 3rd cycle in surgery training. J Visc Surg. 2020;157(3 Suppl 2):S77-85.

7. Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323:2131-2.

8. Nnamani Silva ON, Hernandez S, Kim AS, Campbell AR, Kim EH, Alseidi A, et al. Where do we go from here? assessing medical students' surgery clerkship preparedness during COVID-19. J Surg Educ. 2021;78:1574-82.

9. Asif H, McInnis C, Dang F, Ajzenberg H, Wang PL, Mosa A, et al. Objective Structured Assessment of technical skill (OSATS) in the Surgical Skills and Technology Elective Program (SSTEP): comparison of peer and expert raters. Am J Surg. 2022;223:276-9.

10. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg. 1997;84:273-8.

11. Muresan C, Lee TH, Seagull J, Park AE. Transfer of training in the development of intracorporeal suturing skill in medical student novices: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2010;200:537-41.

12. Boettcher J, Klippgen L, Mietzsch S, Grube F, Krebs T, Berholz R, et al. Spaced education improves the retention of laparoscopic suturing skills: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2020;30:193-200.

13. Zhang J, Zilundu PLM, Zhang W, Yu G, Li S, Zhou L, et al. The use of a surgical boot camp combining anatomical education and surgical simulation for internship preparedness among senior medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:459.

14. Cassidy DJ, McKinley SK, Ogunmuyiwa J, Mullen JT, Phitayakorn R, Petrusa E, et al. Surgical autonomy: a resident perspective and the balance of teacher development with operative independence. Am J Surg. 2021;221:336-44.
15. Brocard E, Antoine P, Mélihan-Cheinin P, Rusch E. COVID-19's impact on home health services, caregivers and patients: lessons from the French experience. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;8:100197.

16. Caskey RC, Owei L, Rao R, Riddle EW, Brooks AD, Dempsey DT, et al. Integration of hands-on team training into existing curriculum improves both technical and nontechnical skills in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Educ. 2017;74:915–20.

17. Popat S, Hubbard C, Mayer WA, Taylor JM. Education time out and debrief: structured implementation of perioperative resident technical education discussion. J Am Coll Surg. 2021;232:65-72.e2.

18. Zhou NJ, Kamil RJ, Hillel AT, Tan M, Walsh J, Russell JO, et al. The role of preoperative briefing and postoperative debriefing in surgical education. J Surg Educ. 2021;78:1182–8.

19. Mota P, Carvalho N, Carvalho-Dias E, João Costa M, Correia-Pinto J, Lima E. Video-based surgical learning: improving trainee education and preparation for surgery. J Surg Educ. 2018;75:828–35.

**Publisher's Note**

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ready to submit your research? Choose BMC and benefit from:

* fast, convenient online submission

* thorough peer review by experienced researchers in your field

* rapid publication on acceptance

* support for research data, including large and complex data types

* gold Open Access which fosters wider collaboration and increased citations

* maximum visibility for your research: over 100M website views per year

At BMC, research is always in progress.

Learn more biomedcentral.com/submissions

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

BMC