# Reconstituted systems for studying the architecture and dynamics of actin networks.

Alice Cantat, Alexandra Colin

► To cite this version:

Alice Cantat, Alexandra Colin. Reconstituted systems for studying the architecture and dynamics of actin networks.. Biochemical Journal, 2025, 482 (11), pp.623-640. 10.1042/BCJ20253044. hal-05098497

HAL Id: hal-05098497

https://hal.science/hal-05098497v1

Submitted on 5 Jun 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

PORTLAND
PRESS

## Review Article

# Reconstituted systems for studying the architecture and dynamics of actin networks

Alice Cantat and Alexandra Colin

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

¹Interdisciplinary Research Institute of Grenoble, Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, CytoMorpho Lab, University of Grenoble-Alpes, CEA, CNRS, INRA, Grenoble, France

Correspondence: Alexandra Colin (alexandra.colin@cnrs.fr)

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

Actin, a ubiquitous protein essential for numerous cellular functions, is found in all eukaryotes. Despite extensive research across molecular to organismal scales, fundamental questions persist regarding the regulation of dynamic actin architectures, their interaction with membranes, and their mechanical properties. Characterizing the factors governing these processes presents significant challenges. This review emphasizes the value of simplified, reconstituted systems in addressing these unresolved questions. We particularly highlight the critical importance of macroscopic, network-level reconstitutions for tackling these issues. We first describe the available methodological toolkit for (1) controlling actin polymerization spatiotemporally and (2) confining actin networks within closed environments to examine boundary constraint effects or the impact of limited component availability on network properties. We then review studies employing these reconstituted systems to investigate how actin architecture influences various processes and how dynamic actin structures are established and maintained. Further, we discuss how network-level reconstitutions have enhanced our understanding of actin networks' mechanical properties and their interaction with the lipid membranes. Throughout the review, we discuss future perspectives for each topic and explain how macroscale reconstitutions can provide deeper mechanistic insights into actin-related processes.

## Introduction

Actin is ubiquitous, being present in all sequenced eukaryotic organisms [1], and is found at very high concentrations ranging from 10 to 150 µM depending on cell type [2–5]. With the help of actin-binding proteins, actin filaments self-organize into different architectures for key functions in the cell [4,6,7]. Since its discovery in 1942 by Albert Szent-Györgyi [8], actin and its molecular partners have been intensively studied from the molecular scale to the organism scale [9–14]. Actin networks play key roles in shape maintenance, generation of forces for cell migration, and generation of forces to separate cells after division or endocytosis [10]. However, despite this intense research, many aspects of the actin cytoskeleton are still not fully understood, particularly at the mechanistic level. This includes the following questions:

* How are the sizes of actin structures defined?

* How is the balance between assembly and disassembly rates achieved to maintain the various sizes and turnover rates of the different actin networks?

* How are actin networks with various sizes and turnovers assembled from a common pool of monomers?

* How are those various network architectures dynamically transformed *in vivo* while keeping their integrity?

* How do actin filament mechanics or network geometry affect the activities of other actin-binding proteins?

* How does membrane geometry affect actin assembly? And reciprocally, how does actin architecture affect membrane properties?

Addressing these questions in a cellular context is extremely challenging. Indeed, the complexity of the cell's interior, with hundreds of molecular actors present at the same time, makes it difficult to gain a mechanistic understanding of the processes at work in the cell. This is why, in this review, we will discuss the importance of using reconstituted systems to answer these major questions [15–18].

More specifically, we will explain why macroscopic reconstitutions, at the level of the networks, are key for addressing those questions. Here, we will focus exclusively on actin-based processes and how they have been investigated using purified proteins. Indeed, cell extracts provide an alternative approach for

Received: 21 January 2025

Accepted: 24 April 2025

Version of Record

Published: 23 May 2025
generating actin structures, as many relevant proteins are already present in the system: actin comet tails, contractile rings, and cortices have been successfully generated and studied in cell extracts [19–24]. However, studies using purified proteins offer distinct advantages for mechanistic investigations, as they allow for precise determination of the minimal set of components and their concentrations required for a given process.

# Importance of single-filament studies and CryoEM approaches to uncover molecular details of actin dynamics

Actin dynamics have been extensively studied *in vitro* through bulk experiments, which served to determine the effects of regulatory proteins on actin assembly and disassembly and to measure the rate constants of actin with its main partners [25–28]. The studies on individual filaments using first fluorescence microscopy and then TIRF (Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence) imaging [29,30] as well as the development of microfluidic systems [31] complemented these approaches. They allowed to study separately the steps of assembly [3,32–36], disassembly [37–42], and recycling [43–45], all key for actin dynamics. Experiments on individual filaments also identified specific properties such as branch formation [46,47], mechanical responses [48–50], or interaction with microtubules [51–54] that are not accessible with bulk experiments [55,56]. These studies have been complemented by single-molecule studies, which, for example, have given a better view of the branch formation by WASP and the Arp2/3 complex [57,58]. More recently, the drastic improvement of cryo-electron microscopy resolution [59] allowed to gain new molecular details about actin polymerization [60,61] and its dependence on actin-associated proteins [62–66]. Altogether, these studies have provided valuable insights into the interactions between actin and its binding proteins, the kinetics of their associated reactions, and other molecular mechanisms involved in these interactions. However, to understand how these proteins work together to control the dynamics of actin networks—and to address the key unresolved questions mentioned earlier—it is essential to extend reconstitution studies to the mesoscale. This scale bridges the gap between discrete molecular complexes and the intracellular environment [67–69].

## Why go for macroscopic reconstitutions?

Reconstituting dynamic actin networks in vitro at the network level offers several advantages. First, it is well-established that actin-binding proteins can exhibit different behaviors depending on the architecture of the network they interact with [6]. Therefore, reconstituting networks is essential for understanding how these proteins bind differently depending on the network's structure. Additionally, reconstituting actin structures in three dimensions has revealed notably how applied forces influence network architecture and biochemical dynamics [70,71]. It is also widely recognized that physicochemical parameters play key roles in shaping the properties of the cytoskeleton within the cell [72–76]. Factors such as macromolecular crowding and viscosity [68,69,73,77] or energy availability [69] are, for example, critical parameters to consider when studying cytoskeleton-based processes. Finally, the effect of local and global depletion of actin and actin-binding proteins on the size and dynamics of actin networks is also an important factor to consider.

## Importance of the environment: the cell as a “constrained” environment

In cells, the reaction space is in the micrometer range. This implies that the number of molecules is small and potentially limited and that the boundaries can be reached by the various structures built into the cell. To assess the impact of these physicochemical parameters on cellular processes, the reconstitution of an environment mimicking the cell's cytoplasm is of paramount importance. This environment is often established with confinement, achieved through microwells, water-in-oil droplets, or vesicles [78]. Most studies employ confinement for mechanical purposes, for example, to observe how it affects actin filament curvature [79–83]. In this case, the boundary condition is introduced to guide the spatial organization of the system. Recently, some studies have proposed using confinement to limit the amount of available components (similar to cellular conditions) and to examine how this global limitation affects the maintenance of actin dynamics over extended time periods and the coexistence of competitive actin
networks [84,85]. The confinement of actin structures will also be critically important for studying the effects of local protein depletion mentioned previously.

**Toolbox: what kind of macroscopic reconstitutions?**

To properly reconstitute actin networks, actin polymerization must be spatiotemporally controlled. In cells, actin polymerization and consequently the formation of the actin network is regulated locally by various activators and nucleators [86]. Over the years, different laboratories have developed various methods to spatiotemporally control the actin polymerization. Currently, the main tools used in reconstituted systems include beads and micropatterns, covered with lipids and/or activators for actin polymerization (WASP or formins, for example).

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1: Toolbox for macroscopic reconstitutions.**</figcaption></figure>

(A) Strategies for controlled actin polymerization in space and time. Top: micropatterns are obtained by burning a Silane PEG layer and then adding lipids and/or the NPF to localize the actin polymerization on the micropattern. Bottom: NPF can be coated on a bead (polystyrene or glass) or on a vesicle. The force generated by the actin network growth triggers the bead or vesicle movement. (B) Strategies for the design of confined environments with various sizes and properties. Abbreviations: NOA: Norland Optical Adhesive, GUVs: giant unilamellar vesicles. SLB: Supported Lipid Bilayer. NPF: Nucleation-Promoting Factor.
## Protein photoactivation

In order to localize actin network formation or function, the first option is to photoactivate actin monomers [87] or motors [88,89]. In this case, the activation is transient (defined by the illumination timing) and the size and shape of the activated area are controllable.

## Micropatterns

Micropatterning consists of burning a selected region on a passivated surface, in order to create “spots” of actin polymerization. Reymann *et al.* [90] developed this method in order to localize a nucleation-promoting factor (NPF) and generate branched networks of various shapes in controlled locations. The localization of the NPF triggers the generation of specific architectures in 2D [91,92] or in 3D [93,94]. More recently, the development of micropatterns covered with lipid bilayers allowed to mimic the activation of actin polymerization close to a membrane [95–97]. In the case of micropatterns, the activation is permanent and static while size and shape of the pattern remain controllable during the burning stage (Figure 1A).

## Beads and vesicles

The reconstitution of actin networks around beads or vesicles comes from the historical reconstitution of the sustained motility of the bacterium *Listeria monocytogenes* with purified proteins [98]. The reconstitution of actin structures around beads was first done in egg extracts [19,99–101] and then with purified proteins [102]. By coating the bead with an NPF and putting it in the appropriate mixture of proteins [102,103], a comet of branched actin filaments grows from the bead, with actin polymerization propelling the bead forward (Figure 1A). One of the main advantages of this assay is that the movement of the bead provides a reliable readout of actin dynamics. Additionally, the size, shape, and intensity of the network can be easily measured using fluorescence microscopy [84]. Activation is permanent as the NPF coating the bead is constitutively active, and bead size and shape can be modified and controlled [77,101]. The reconstitution of motility using NPF-coated vesicles in egg extracts has been used to probe the mechanical forces exerted by F-actin networks on membranes (Figure 1A [104,105]).

## Various compartments can be used for mechanical constraints and component limitations

Microwells (or microfabricated chambers, Figure 1B) have been used for a long time to create 3D confinement of microtubules [106]. They can be constructed using lithography methods, and the walls of the chambers can be easily functionalized with specific proteins or lipids [106,107]. Actin has been successfully encapsulated in microfabricated chambers [79,108].

Vesicles (or liposomes) are based on a lipid bilayer made of phospholipids (Figure 1B). They are currently the first choice of encapsulation for people working in the field of synthetic cell (which aims to understand how cells work by reproducing their molecular mechanisms [109,110]), and actin has also already been successfully encapsulated in liposomes [111]. However, even if various methods were developed to produce the vesicles, protein encapsulation is challenging and not always reproducible [83,112–114]. Another alternative is to use water-in-oil droplets (Figure 1B), which can be more easily created and filled with proteins. Phospholipids are usually dissolved in oil to stabilize the emulsion interface: they act as a surfactant, reducing the surface tension between the oil and water phases, and thus reducing droplet coalescence [115]. With this method, the outside medium being oil, exchanges with the outside medium are prohibited. The main advantage of droplets and vesicles is that they can be deformed [80] to modify their shape and see the influence on protein organization. Therefore, they are a potent tool, in the field of synthetic cells, to tackle the challenges of the reconstitution of motility and cell division, for example [116].

## Mimicking the proximity with a membrane: lipid bilayers

Many processes related to actin cytoskeleton function happen close to a membrane. Supported lipid bilayers (SLBs) are a powerful system to mimic the plasma membrane [117]. They consist of a glass coverslip functionalized with various lipids that are separated from the substrate by a thin layer of water to
allow the lateral mobility of lipids. They can be easily imaged with TIRF microscopy and they have been
combined with the other tools described above to create lipid micropatterns, for example [96].

Combination of these approaches

Interestingly, all the above approaches can be used in combination. Indeed, SLBs have been adapted for the design of lipid micropatterns to study the effect of frictional forces on actomyosin contractility [96], NPF-coated beads or micropatterns can be introduced into microwells to study the effect of a limited amount of components [84,85], and giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) can be spread on micropatterns to see the influence of vesicle shape on actin orientation [118,119]. The use of various lipid compositions that spontaneously segregate into domains also makes it possible to target actin polymerization in a specific domain on GUVs [120].

What kind of questions have been and can be addressed
using macroscopic reconstitutions?

Influence of actin architecture on various processes

Context. In cells, various architectures coexist and share the same pool of actin monomers and actin-binding proteins [6,7,121]. Understanding how the same pool of proteins can mediate various functions in the cells has been a key question in the actin cytoskeleton field for the last decade.

Reconstitution of various architectures on micropatterns has made it possible to investigate the role
of several factors on network contractility and how it leads to global shape changes. Indeed, architecture
(branched or linear network [91,92]), connectivity (degree of filament cross-linking [92,122]), boundaries
(zone in which myosin is active [88]), or friction between the actin network and its interacting substrate
[96] are all factors that influence global actin network contraction. Large-scale reconstitution of various
architectures on lipid bilayers gave insights into the impact of network architecture on the generation
of stresses [123] and showed that contractility is highly cooperative and telescopic (i.e. that the speed
of contraction is proportional to the size of the region where myosin activity has been activated) [89].
By reconstituting actomyosin networks in oil droplets, Sakamoto and Murrell [124] showed the impact

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2: Mechanistic details obtained on the influence of actin architecture and turnover using macroscopic reconstructions.**</figcaption></figure>

(A) Actin architecture (linear bundles or branched network) has been shown to influence protein binding such as capping protein or tropomyosin and alpha-actinin. (B) Actin turnover has been looked at from several angles. Motility of branched or linear networks was reconstituted from different components. Then, NPF density and disassembly rate were shown to influence the size of branched networks. Fascin-cross-linked bundles are protected from ADF/cofilin disassembly. Finally, recycling has been shown to be necessary for long-lived branched networks in a dynamic steady state.
of network architecture on energy consumption by myosin. In a similar fashion, reconstitutions on micropatterns allowed to show the selectivity of actin architecture on disassembly of the network [125] and the impact of network density on Actin Depolymerization Factor (ADF)/cofilin-mediated disassembly [126] (Figure 2B).

The binding and localization of proteins have also been addressed in the context of the competition between branched and linear networks thanks to the reconstitution of branched and linear networks on polystyrene beads [127,128]. In addition, reconstitution of branched and linear actin networks on beads has demonstrated that profilin—an abundant actin monomer-binding protein that inhibits spontaneous filament polymerization—restricts the growth of branched networks while promoting the growth of linear networks [129,130]. With the same system, Suarez et al. and Winkelman et al. [131,132] showed how protein competition and sorting depend on actin architecture (Figure 2A).

The reconstitution of branched networks on micron-sized beads has also provided valuable insights into the functional interaction between the various molecular players involved in these networks [133–139]. On beads’ surface, two different proteins can be localized, therefore allowing to decipher the effect of proximity between proteins (and therefore subsequent binding) on the formation of dendritic networks. For example, by co-localizing lamellipodin and VCA on a glass bead coated with a lipid bilayer, Hansen and Mullins [140] proposed that lamellipodin slows the assembly of branched networks. In another study, by functionalizing polystyrene beads simultaneously with an activator of the Arp2/3 complex and Myosin-I, Xu et al. [141] showed that myosin I can boost the force-generation capacity of a branched network (Figure 2A). All these examples show that reconstitution of actin networks on micropatterns or around micron-sized beads is a versatile system to address the effect of actin architecture on the binding and localization of actin-related proteins.

**Perspectives.** Taking into account, in the reconstitution, the association of actin-binding proteins on various actin isoforms and on actin with various post-translational modifications will certainly be of primary importance to understanding the formation of networks with various biochemical identities in the cell [142]. In addition, how the shape and function of actin networks evolved and diversified in the eukaryotic lineage is still poorly understood [1]. Understanding how different organisms have evolved different actin dynamics for their specific functions has begun to be addressed with structural and single-filament methods [143–145] but could now easily be tackled at the network scale. This will make it possible to assess the impact of these different dynamics on the functions and properties of different actin networks [1,146].

## Interaction between actin and microtubule networks

It is well known that the interaction of actin filaments with microtubules is critical for several cellular functions [147]. The set-up of biochemical conditions to reconstitute simultaneously dynamic actin networks and dynamic microtubules [148] was key for showing how actin network architecture regulates microtubule growth and dynamics [53,149,150], how actin filaments can guide microtubule organization or movement and act as a structural memory [151,152], and how actin architecture can mediate centrosome positioning [107] without the need for cross-linker between the two networks. Engineering of a protein that links growing microtubule ends to actin filaments (TipAct [51]), showed that growing microtubules can be captured and guided by stiff actin bundles, leading to global actin-microtubule alignment. Thus, the simultaneous reconstitution of actin and microtubule networks has shown that actin can impose its organization on microtubules, and vice versa.

**Perspectives.** The molecular mechanisms behind the effects of actin–microtubule interaction mentioned above are not yet well understood. The hypothesis of a frictional force between actin and microtubule fibers has been put forward to explain the impact on polymer dynamics when the two networks align [53,54] but still needs further validation. In addition, future works studying the positioning of the two networks in relation to each other and the potential impact on signaling [21] are exciting avenues to better understand the cross-talk between those two networks in the cell.

## Dynamic/turnover of structures

**Context.** The dynamic nature of actin architectures is of paramount importance when cells have to adapt to a changing environment [153–155]. In cells, the different coexisting architectures have various turnover rates, depending on their functions, with very fast turnover rates for lamellipodial or endocytic structures and slower turnover rates for stress fibers, for example [156]. However, understanding how these
different turnover rates are established and maintained remains a challenge, and how the assembly and disassembly rates are coordinated to maintain a constant structure size through various feedbacks is still unclear. Therefore, the reconstitution of structures in a dynamic steady state is of primary importance to understand the basic mechanisms of actin turnover [156].

Mc Call *et al.* [157] reconstituted entangled actin filaments and showed the impact of nonequilibrium turnover on the dynamics and mechanics of the filaments. In particular, they demonstrated that the severing protein ADF/cofilin promotes fluidization of the network. On another hand, Guo *et al.* [158] showed that actin-binding proteins CAP (Cyclase-associated Protein) and Abp1 (Actin-binding protein 1) can drastically coalesce branched actin networks into bundles.

Studies reconstituting branched or linear actin networks on beads or micropatterns have provided valuable insights into the different steps of the turnover cycle. Reconstitution of branched networks around WASP-coated beads showed the minimal ingredients necessary for the formation of star-like networks, resembling the filopodia found in cells [100] (Figure 2B). The reconstitution of bacteria motility with purified proteins showed the dependence on the capping protein for the motility velocity [98]. Further work on branched networks reconstituted on beads demonstrated how capping protein increases the rate of motility by promoting more frequent filament nucleation [134]. Bead motility assays also allowed to point out the key role of ATP hydrolysis in branched actin network assembly and disassembly [84,159]. Interestingly, the formin-based motility does not require capping protein, which even causes arrest of formin-coated beads [160] (Figure 2B). Regarding the disassembly step, reconstitution of actin turnover on beads or on micropatterns has been instrumental in understanding how stochastic severing by ADF/cofilin facilitates the network turnover by releasing large parts of the actin bundles [38,103] and how the disassembly rate depends on the actin network density and architecture as well as on cofilin concentration [125,126]. By reconstituting linear bundles cross-linked by fascin, Chikireddy *et al.* [161] showed that fascin cross-linking protects the bundles from ADF/cofilin disassembly (Figure 2B). Moreover, Pollard *et al.* [162] identified that a mixture of seven purified proteins was sufficient to reconstitute cable formation with a polarized turnover. Finally, coating of beads with NPF for branched actin networks as well as formins showed a synergic activity of the two proteins and a formin-mediated protection from debranching by ADF/cofilin [163]. Until recently, the recycling step has been overlooked in macroscopic reconstitutions. However, recent studies combining bead motility assay and confinement in microwells demonstrated how recycling is necessary to ensure long-lived turnover of actin networks, and how this turnover allows several competitive structures to coexist in the same environment [84,85].

**Perspectives.** The different steps of actin turnover (assembly, disassembly, and recycling) are now well understood at the molecular level. Even if some studies started to address their coordination with reconstituted systems, how these steps are balanced and, more precisely, what types of feedback exist between them is still unclear and requires more exploration. The hypothesis that the size of the available actin monomer pool serves as feedback for the assembly rate has been proposed by different studies in cells [129,164] and in reconstituted systems [84] but still needs further validation. Furthermore, understanding how architectures with different sizes and turnover rates share the same limiting pool of proteins remains a key unanswered question. Theoretical studies have proposed possible mechanisms behind dynamic scaling [165–169] and the reconstituted systems at the mesoscale mentioned above have the power to test the validity of those mechanisms. More precisely, with the use of confined environments, it is possible to finely tune the number of proteins, as well as their concentration or density, and the physical properties of the medium, and therefore to study the impact of these factors on the size and dynamic of different actin architectures.

## Mechanical properties of actin networks

**Context.** Cells are intrinsically subjected to several mechanical constraints, and they also produce forces during the processes of morphogenesis, migration, endocytosis, organelle transport, or cell division [7]. Historical reconstitutions of entangled and branched networks and their analysis with passive or active micro-rheology tools have been key to understanding the viscoelastic properties of actin networks [170–172]. Addition of myosin and cross-linkers to these networks allowed to show that contractility occurs at optimal concentrations of motors and cross-linkers [92,173–175].

Then, the reconstitution of actin networks around beads or vesicles has been key to obtaining a better understanding of the forces generated by a growing actin network. Indeed, by first using beads coated with ActA and introduced in HeLa cell extracts, Noireaux *et al.* [176] estimated that forces exerted by an actin
gel are about 10 pN. Subsequent studies with purified proteins showed the impact of physical properties on the growth of branched networks [77,102] and the tight coupling between biochemical and physical properties of the networks [177,178]. Moreover, this type of assay allowed to show that the symmetry breaking required to move the bead is based on the release of elastic energy, analogous to the fracture of polymer gels [179,180] (Figure 3A) and that the elastic gel exerts a friction force on the bead [181,182]. Reconstitution of motility on deformable objects (GUVs) coated with an activator of the Arp2/3 complex showed that the deformability of the object and the mobility of the activator at the lipid surface affect dynamic and structural parameters of the actin networks [183,184]. Altogether, these assays provide a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying motility initiation [134,185].

Reconstitution of branched actin networks growing from micropatterns in 3D, combined with an AFM tip to apply force on the growing network, allowed showing in a very elegant manner that growth of a branched network against a load leads to a denser network and to an adaptation of the architecture [70,71] (Figure 3B), similarly to what has been described in cellular systems [153,186]. In addition, the growth of branched networks in 2D from similar micropatterns with different densities of NPF led to the generation of heterogeneous networks; this network heterogeneity was shown to impose a direction in motility [187].

The generation of forces relies a lot on the adhesive properties of the cells. This aspect has been studied by using micropatterns functionalized with the talin protein. These studies revealed that actomyosin-dependent dynamics of the talin–vinculin complex and activation of vinculin by stretched talin induce a positive feedback that reinforces the actin–talin–vinculin association, and that actomyosin force triggers protein binding on the mechanosensitive protein talin [188,189]. Study of vinculin’s interaction with branched networks grown from micropatterns showed that vinculin can bundle dendritic actin networks at nascent adhesions [190].

**Perspectives.** Altogether, the experiments on beads and on micropatterns shed some light on the mechanical properties of branched actin networks, a key feature for motility, endocytosis, and more. In the next years, the reconstitution of motility from purified proteins will certainly help to understand the minimal elements necessary for cell movement and the mechanisms associated with different types of migration [191]. In this context, in order to understand the molecular mechanisms and minimal requirements for cell motility, the reconstitution of adhesion will be of primary importance. First steps toward this adhesion reconstitution has been done by binding talin at the surface of GUVs and by looking at the effect of the presence of talin, as well as kindlin and actomyosin, on the ability of the system to cluster integrins [192].

## Actin interaction with membrane (2D and 3D)

**Context.** Interaction between actin and the plasma membrane plays a key role in many biological processes (cell division, cell migration, endocytosis, cell spreading, membrane trafficking, long-range coordination of cell polarity, etc.) [193–198]. Actin is present below the membrane (forming the cortex) and the plasma membrane is a big spot of actin polymerization regulation (via the Pip2, Rho pathways, etc.). For a cell to move, actin assembly must generate a force sufficient to move the plasma membrane. There is a reciprocal interaction between actin and the cell membrane: indeed, actin polymerization can increase membrane tension but actin polymerization can also be triggered at the curved regions (via the recruitment of BAR proteins, for example) [197].

Many studies have reconstituted actin networks close to lipid membranes [117]. By using SLBs in two dimensions, Murrell and Gardel, and Vogel et al. [199,200] showed that the extent of actin adhesion to a membrane can regulate the coupling between network contraction and F-actin severing. In more recent studies, variation of lipid composition was shown to have an impact on the connectivity to the membrane [201] and VASP (Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein) binding on lipids was shown to facilitate the formation of large bundles [202]. By adding myosin II to an actin cortex polymerized on a lipid bilayer, Sonal et al. [203] observed a dynamic reorganization of the actin network. In addition, it was shown that linkage between branched actin network and lipids can modulate the friction and orient the axis of contraction [96]. On the other hand, it was also shown that actin polymerization can reorganize lipids (and promote phase separation) [204–206]. Indeed, the use of SLB allows to see how large-scale reorganization of proteins can have an impact on actin polymerization. For example, Banjade et al. [207] showed that attachment of nephrin to a lipid bilayer promotes multivalent interactions and then phase separation of the protein with its cytoplasmic partners Nck and N-WASP. These clusters can then assemble branched actin network, therefore giving hints about the regulation of local actin assembly at membranes.
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**B** Load adaptation capacities</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**C**

**Actin cortex formation**

**Contraction of actin cortex**

**Capping Protein**

**Membrane deformation**

**Filopodia-like protrusions**

**Actomyosin ring formation**</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Generation of deformations**</figcaption></figure>

<caption>**Figure 3: Mechanistic details gained on mechanical properties of actin networks and on their interaction with the membrane using macroscopic reconstitutions.**</caption>

(A) When coated with an NPF and placed in a mix of purified proteins, an actin network grows around the beads and then accumulates elastic strain. The release of this stress triggers a symmetry breaking and therefore the bead movement. (B) Networks grown from micropatterns in three dimensions were shown to adapt their density, depending on the applied load. (C) Actin networks were polymerized inside and outside of GUVs and were shown to break their symmetry in the presence of molecular motors. Depending on the protein present in the experiment, membrane deformation, filopodia-like protrusions, or actomyosin rings can be observed.

In three dimensions, the interactions between actin and membranes have mainly been studied with GUVs [208] but water-in-oil emulsions stabilized with lipids are also a good option to study actin-membrane interactions. Many studies focused on the generation of cortex-like structures outside or inside the vesicles (Figure 3C). The study of Pontani et al. [209] was the first to reconstitute an actin cortex inside a liposome. Next, Carvalho et al. and Loiseau et al. [210,211] added myosin to the cortex-like structures to generate cortical tension, the level of which is determined by the amount of motors, the connectivity of the network, and its attachment to the membrane. They observed remodeling of the actin cortex as well as changes in membrane shape (Figure 3C). Subsequent studies looked at the effect of actin-binding proteins like cross-linkers [212–214] or capping protein [215] on vesicle shape. Altogether, these studies demonstrated the importance of actin network connectivity and membrane attachment to drive large-scale shape changes (Figure 3C). Those shape changes of the vesicles have also been widely studied in the context of protrusion generation. For example, Liu et al. [216] showed that branched actin networks can deform a liposome membrane in “filopodia-like” bundled actin protrusions. Then, Simon et al. and Allard et al. [217,218] demonstrated that reconstitution of branched actin network (with capping protein) is sufficient to drive inward and outward membrane deformation. Moreover, heterogeneities in the actin network can favor membrane protrusions [219]. Actin networks can sense membrane curvature [83], and actin rings formed inside water-in-oil droplets spontaneously positioned at the equator of the droplet [220]. Recently, a few studies showed that actomyosin rings, targeted at the equatorial plane of vesicles, could deform the vesicles [221,222]. Moreover, addition of a membrane curvature sensor can recruit the actin polymerase VASP to assemble actin filaments locally on membranes and then generate protrusions that are similar to filopodia [223]. Therefore, reconstitution of assembly-based actin network inside deformable vesicles revealed a large range of deformations, which can be compared with those observed in cells. In addition, different methods give quantitative measures of the magnitude of those forces, which is necessary for a mechanistic understanding of the actin-based processes associated with the membrane.

Interaction of actin with membrane also happens in cargo transport where most of the cargos are vesicles. Interaction of actin filaments with motors transporting cargos is important for polarized transport of material in the cell [224]. By reconstituting liposomes transported by myosin Va in a 3D actin network, Lombardo et al. [225] demonstrated the impact of actin architecture, and therefore of actin
filament polarity, on the transport of liposomes. Moreover, reconstitution of composite actin–microtubules networks with myosin1C and kinesin1 motors showed the influence of the motors on the vesicles deformation and therefore on the tubule formation [226].

**Perspectives.** As discussed in [227], there is still the need to precisely decipher the mechanisms of actin assembly at the membrane, and more precisely the mechanisms of the interaction between actin-membrane linkers and actin-associated proteins for the regulation of polymerization. In addition, understanding how actin-membrane linkers propagate membrane tension will give better insights for all the processes involving actin-membrane interaction. Moreover, in the field of synthetic cell development, reconstitution of dynamic actin networks inside vesicles is still a challenge. Reconstituting networks able to generate sufficient forces to divide the vesicle is an even bigger but exciting challenge.

## Future perspectives

Thanks to advances in biochemistry, the study of single filaments, and electron microscopy, many of the molecular players involved in actin structures are now well characterized and their functions better understood. With the tools described above, it is now conceivable to reconstitute any actin architecture under physicochemical conditions that mimic those found in cells, using a limited number of components. This approach could make it possible to identify the minimal set of ingredients required for key cellular processes such as motility, endocytosis, and division. However, a major limitation is the number of proteins that can be introduced simultaneously into a closed environment. Beyond the technical challenge of precise pipetting, the incorporation of multiple proteins leads to an exponential increase in the number of possible concentration combinations, which can exceed practical experimental capabilities. To meet this challenge, predictive mathematical models could prove invaluable. These models would make it possible to identify the key parameters to be varied, thus reducing the space of parameters to be experimentally tested. They would also make it easier to interpret the data, which becomes increasingly complex as the number of proteins and reactions in the assay increases. Alternatively, to test multiple combinations of parameters and protein concentrations, automated systems could be developed. Automation would allow precise pipetting and enable parallel experimentation, significantly increasing throughput and efficiency.

As mentioned above, the incorporation of physical parameters in the reconstitutions will certainly be of primary importance. Indeed, parameters like osmolarity, viscosity heterogeneity in the cytoplasm, or pH gradients were shown to be crucial for cytoskeleton-based processes in cellular studies [74,228–230]. Moreover, a cell is not a homogeneous medium, so incorporating heterogeneity into reconstituted systems will also be of paramount importance. This can be achieved by confining some reactions to certain compartments (with or without membrane) [231,232] or by incorporating spatio-temporally controlled signaling [21,233–236]. On a longer and more technological timescale, reconstitution of actin at the macroscopic level could find applications in electronics [93] or in living materials fields [237].

The combination of studies reconstituting networks at the macroscopic level, with work studying actin at the single-molecule or single-filament level, and with research studying actin at the cellular or organismal level, provides a multi-scale approach and powerful tools for linking the different scales of actin complexity. The use of these complementary approaches will certainly enable us to fully answer the questions mentioned in the introduction in the years to come.

## Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Funding

This work was supported by the grant ANR-24-CE13-3582 SCALING to A.Co., who also thanks CNRS Biology for the allocation of new CNRS entrants. This work received funding from GRAL, the Grenoble Alliance for Integrated Structural and Cell Biology, a program of the Chemistry Biology Health Graduate School of Université Grenoble Alpes (ANR-17-EURE-0003).

## CRediT Author Contribution

Conceptualization: A.Co; Visualization: A.Ca; Funding acquisition: A.Co; Writing - original draft: A.Co; Writing - review & editing: A.Co, A.Ca
**Acknowledgments**

We thank Laurent Blanchoin and Cristian Suarez for careful reading of the manuscript and all the members of Cytomorpholab for instructive discussions.

**Abbreviations**

GUV, giant unilamellar vesicles; NOA, Norland Optical Adhesive; NPF, nucleation-promoting factor; SLB, supported lipid bilayer.

**References**

1 Velle, K.B., Swafford, A.J.M., Garner, E. and Fritz-Laylin, L.K. (2024) Actin network evolution as a key driver of eukaryotic diversification. *J. Cell. Sci.* **137**, jcs261660 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.261660

2 Koestler, S.A., Rottner, K., Lai, F., Block, J., Vinzenz, M. and Small, J.V. (2009) F- and G-actin concentrations in lamellipodia of moving cells. *Plos One* **4**, e4810 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004810

3 Funk, J., Merino, F., Venkova, L., Heydenreich, L., Kierfeld, J., Vargas, P. et al. (2019) Profilin and formin constitute a pacemaker system for robust actin filament growth. *Elife* **8**, e50963 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50963

4 Pollard, T.D., Blanchoin, L. and Mullins, R.D. (2000) Molecular mechanisms controlling actin filament dynamics in nonmuscle cells. *Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.* **29**, 545–576 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.545

5 Gonzalez Rodriguez, S., Wirshing, A.C.E., Goodman, A.L. and Goode, B.L. (2023) Cytosolic concentrations of actin binding proteins and the implications for in vivo F-actin turnover. *J. Cell Biol.* **222**, e202306036 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202306036

6 Blanchoin, L., Boujemaa-Paterski, R., Sykes, C. and Plastino, J. (2014) Actin dynamics, architecture, and mechanics in cell motility. *Physiol. Rev.* **94**, 235–263 https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00018.2013

7 Lappalainen, P., Kotila, T., Jégou, A. and Romet-Lemonne, G. (2022) Biochemical and mechanical regulation of actin dynamics. *Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.* **23**, 836–852 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00508-4

8 Bugyi, B. and Kellermayer, M. (2020) The discovery of actin: “to see what everyone else has seen, and to think what nobody has thought”. *J. Muscle Res. Cell. Motil.* **41**, 3–9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10974-019-09515-z

9 Theriot, J.A. (1994) Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in living cells. *Semin. Cell Biol.* **5**, 193–199 https://doi.org/10.1006/scel.1994.1024

10 Pollard, T.D. and Cooper, J.A. (2009) Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement. *Science* **326**, 1208–1212 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175862

11 Pollard, T.D. (2016) Actin and actin-binding proteins. *Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.* **8**, a018226 https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a018226

12 Lebreton, G., Géminard, C., Lapraz, F., Pyrpassopoulos, S., Cerezo, D., Spéder, P. et al. (2018) Molecular to organismal chirality is induced by the conserved myosin 1D. *Science* **362**, 949–952 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8642

13 Svitkina, T. (2018) The actin cytoskeleton and actin-based motility. *Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.* **10**, a018267 https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a018267

14 Bai, Y., Zhao, F., Wu, T., Chen, F. and Pang, X. (2023) Actin polymerization and depolymerization in developing vertebrates. *Front. Physiol.* **14**, 1213668 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1213668

15 Liu, A.P. and Fletcher, D.A. (2009) Biology under construction: *in vitro* reconstitution of cellular function. *Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.* **10**, 644–650 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2746

16 Cáceres, R., Abou-Ghali, M. and Plastino, J. (2015) Reconstituting the actin cytoskeleton at or near surfaces *in vitro*. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* **1853**, 3006–3014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.07.021

17 Jia, H. and Schwille, P. (2019) Bottom-up synthetic biology: reconstitution in space and time. *Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.* **60**, 179–187 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.05.008

18 Mullins, R.D. and Hansen, S.D. (2013) *In vitro* studies of actin filament and network dynamics. *Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.* **25**, 6–13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2012.11.007

19 Cameron, L.A., Footer, M.J., Van Oudenaarden, A., Theriot, J.A. (1999) Motility of ActA protein-coated microspheres driven by actin polymerization. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **96**, 4908–4913 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.9.4908

20 Abu Shah, E. and Keren, K. (2014) Symmetry breaking in reconstituted actin cortices. *Elife* **3**, e01433 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01433

21 Colin, A., Bonnemay, L., Gayrard, C., Gautier, J. and Gueroui, Z. (2016) Triggering signaling pathways using F-actin self-organization. *Sci. Rep.* **6**, 34657 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34657

22 Tan, T.H., Malik-Garbi, M., Abu-Shah, E., Li, J., Sharma, A., MacKintosh, F.C. et al. (2018) Self-organized stress patterns drive state transitions in actin cortices. *Sci. Adv.* **4**, eaar2847 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar2847

23 Sakamoto, R., Izri, Z., Shimamoto, Y., Miyazaki, M. and Maeda, Y.T. (2022) Geometric trade-off between contractile force and viscous drag determines the actomyosin-based motility of a cell-sized droplet. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **119**, e2121147119 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2121147119

24 Krishna, A., Savinov, M., Ierushalmi, N., Mogilner, A. and Keren, K. (2024) Size-dependent transition from steady contraction to waves in actomyosin networks with turnover. *Nat. Phys.* **20**, 123–134 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02271-5

25 Pollard, T.D. and Cooper, J.A. (1986) Actin and actin-binding proteins: a critical evaluation of mechanisms and functions. *Annu. Rev. Biochem.* **55**, 987–1035 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.005011

26 Pollard, T.D., Goldberg, I. and Schwarz, W.H. (1992) Nucleotide exchange, structure, and mechanical properties of filaments assembled from ATP-actin and ADP-actin. *J. Biol. Chem.* **267**, 20339–20345 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)88707-0
27 Didry, D., Carlier, M.F. and Pantaloni, D. (1998) Synergy between actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin and profilin in increasing actin filament turnover. *J. Biol. Chem.* **273**, 25602–25611 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.40.25602

28 Blanchoin, L. and Pollard, T.D. (1998) Interaction of actin monomers with Acanthamoeba Actophorin (ADF/cofilin) and profilin. *J. Biol. Chem.* **273**, 25106–25111 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.39.25106

29 Tokunaga, M., Kitamura, K., Saito, K., Iwane, A.H. and Yanagida, T. (1997) Single molecule imaging of fluorophores and enzymatic reactions achieved by objective-type total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. *Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.* **235**, 47–53 https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1997.6732

30 Amann, K.J. and Pollard, T.D. (2001) Direct real-time observation of actin filament branching mediated by Arp2/3 complex using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **98**, 15009–15013 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211556398

31 Jégou, A., Niedermayer, T., Orbán, J., Didry, D., Lipowsky, R., Carlier, M.F. et al. (2011) Individual actin filaments in a microfluidic flow reveal the mechanism of ATP hydrolysis and give insight into the properties of profilin. *Plos Biol.* **9**, e1001161 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001161

32 Blanchoin, L., Pollard, T.D. and Mullins, R.D. (2000) Interactions of ADF/cofilin, Arp2/3 complex, capping protein and profilin in remodeling of branched actin filament networks. *Curr. Biol.* **10**, 1273–1282 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00749-1

33 Michelot, A., Derivery, E., Paterski-Boujemaa, R., Guérin, C., Huang, S., Parcy, F. et al. (2006) A novel mechanism for the formation of actin-filament bundles by a nonprocessive formin. *Curr. Biol.* **16**, 1924–1930 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.054

34 Kovar, D.R., Harris, E.S., Mahaffy, R., Higgs, H.N. and Pollard, T.D. (2006) Control of the assembly of ATP- and ADP-actin by formins and profilin. *Cell* **124**, 423–435 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.038

35 Shekhar, S., Kerleau, M., Kühn, S., Pernier, J., Romet-Lemonne, G., Jégou, A. et al. (2015) Formin and capping protein together embrace the actin filament in a ménage à trois. *Nat. Commun.* **6**, 8730 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9730

36 Bombardier, J.P., Eskin, J.A., Jaiswal, R., Corrèa, I.R., Jr, Xu, M.Q., Goode, B.L. et al. (2015) Single-molecule visualization of a formin-capping protein "decision complex" at the actin filament barbed end. *Nat. Commun.* **6**, 8707 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9707

37 Andrianantoandro, E. and Pollard, T.D. (2006) Mechanism of actin filament turnover by severing and nucleation at different concentrations of ADF/cofilin. *Mol. Cell* **24**, 13–23 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.006

38 Michelot, A., Berro, J., Guérin, C., Boujemaa-Paterski, R., Staiger, C.J., Martiel, J.L. et al. (2007) Actin-filament stochastic dynamics mediated by ADF/cofilin. *Curr. Biol.* **17**, 825–833 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.037

39 Suarez, C., Roland, J., Boujemaa-Paterski, R., Kang, H., McCullough, B.R., Reymann, A.C. et al. (2011) Cofilin tunes the nucleotide state of actin filaments and severs at bare and decorated segment boundaries. *Curr. Biol.* **21**, 862–868 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.064

40 Wioland, H., Guichard, B., Senju, Y., Myram, S., Lappalainen, P., Jégou, A. et al. (2017) ADF/Cofilin accelerates actin dynamics by severing filaments and promoting their depolymerization at both ends. *Curr. Biol.* **27**, 1956–1967 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.048

41 Wioland, H., Jegou, A. and Romet-Lemonne, G. (2019) Torsional stress generated by ADF/cofilin on cross-linked actin filaments boosts their severing. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **116**, 2595–2602 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812053116

42 Shekhar, S., Hoeprich, G.J., Gelles, J. and Goode, B.L. (2021) Twinfilin bypasses assembly conditions and actin filament aging to drive barbed end depolymerization. *J. Cell Biol.* **220**, e202006022 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202006022

43 Johnston, A.B., Collins, A. and Goode, B.L. (2015) High-speed depolymerization at actin filament ends jointly catalysed by twinfilin and Srv2/CAP. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **17**, 1504–1511 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3252

44 Shekhar, S., Chung, J., Kondev, J., Gelles, J. and Goode, B.L. (2019) Synergy between cyclase-associated protein and Cofilin accelerates actin filament depolymerization by two orders of magnitude. *Nat. Commun.* **10**, 5319 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13268-1

45 Kotila, T., Wioland, H., Enkavi, G., Kogan, K., Vattulainen, I., Jégou, A. et al. (2019) Mechanism of synergistic actin filament pointed end depolymerization by cyclase-associated protein and coflin. *Nat. Commun.* **10**, 5320 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13213-2

46 Mullins, R.D., Heuser, J.A. and Pollard, T.D. (1998) The interaction of Arp2/3 complex with actin: nucleation, high affinity pointed end capping, and formation of branching networks of filaments. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **95**, 6181–6186 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.11.6181

47 Blanchoin, L., Amann, K.J., Higgs, H.N., Marchand, J.B., Kaiser, D.A. and Pollard, T.D. (2000) Direct observation of dendritic actin filament networks nucleated by Arp2/3 complex and WASP/Scar proteins. *Nature* **404**, 1007–1011 https://doi.org/10.1038/35010008

48 Kovar, D.R. and Pollard, T.D. (2004) Insertional assembly of actin filament barbed ends in association with formins produces piconewton forces. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **101**, 14725–14730 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405902101

49 Romet-Lemonne, G. and Jégou, A. (2013) Mechanotransduction down to individual actin filaments. *Eur. J. Cell Biol.* **92**, 333–338 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2013.10.011

50 Cao, L., Kerleau, M., Suzuki, E.L., Wioland, H., Jouet, S., Guichard, B. et al. (2018) Modulation of formin processivity by profilin and mechanical tension. *Elife* **7**, e34176 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34176

51 Preciado López, M., Huber, F., Grigoriev, I., Steinmetz, M.O., Akhmanova, A., Koenderink, G.H. et al. (2014) Actin-microtubule coordination at growing microtubule ends. *Nat. Commun.* **5**, 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5778

52 Henty-Ridilla, J.L., Rankova, A., Eskin, J.A., Kenny, K. and Goode, B.L. (2016) Accelerated actin filament polymerization from microtubule plus ends. *Science* **352**, 1004–1009 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf1709

53 Colin, A., Singaravelu, P., Théry, M., Blanchoin, L. and Gueroui, Z. (2018) Actin-network architecture regulates microtubule dynamics. *Curr. Biol.* **28**, 2647–2656 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.028

54 Alkemade, C., Wierenga, H., Volkov, V.A., Preciado López, M., Akhmanova, A., Ten Wolde, P.R. et al. (2022) Cross-linkers at growing microtubule ends generate forces that drive actin transport. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **119**, e2112799119 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112799119

55 Shekhar, S. and Carlier, M.F. (2016) Single-filament kinetic studies provide novel insights into regulation of actin-based motility. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **27**, 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-06-0352

56 Wioland, H., Jégou, A. and Romet-Lemonne, G. (2022) Celebrating 20 years of live single-actin-filament studies with five golden rules. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **119**, e2109506119 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109506119
57 Smith, B.A., Padrick, S.B., Doolittle, L.K., Daugherty-Clarke, K., Corrêa, I.R., Jr, Xu, M.Q. et al. (2013) Three-color single molecule imaging shows WASP detachment from Arp2/3 complex triggers actin filament branch formation. *Elife* 2, e01008 https://doi.org/10.7554/ eLife.01008

58 Smith, B.A., Daugherty-Clarke, K., Goode, B.L. and Gelles, J. (2013) Pathway of actin filament branch formation by Arp2/3 complex revealed by single-molecule imaging. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **110**, 1285–1290 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211164110

59 Merino, F., Pospich, S. and Raunser, S. (2020) Towards a structural understanding of the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton. *Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.* **102**, 51–64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.11.018

60 Reynolds, M.J., Hachicho, C., Carl, A.G., Gong, R. and Alushin, G.M. (2022) Bending forces and nucleotide state jointly regulate F-actin structure. *Nature* **611**, 380–386 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05366-w

61 Oosterheert, W., Klink, B.U., Belyy, A., Pospich, S. and Raunser, S. (2022) Structural basis of actin filament assembly and aging. *Nature* **611**, 374–379 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05241-8

62 Kotila, T., Kogan, K., Enkavi, G., Guo, S., Vattulainen, I., Goode, B.L. et al. (2018) Structural basis of actin monomer re-charging by cyclase-associated protein. *Nat. Commun.* **9**, 1892 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04231-7

63 Carman, P.J., Barrie, K.R., Rebowski, G. and Dominguez, R. (2023) Structures of the free and capped ends of the actin filament. *Science* **380**, 1287–1292 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg6812

64 Oosterheert, W., Boiero Sanders, M., Funk, J., Prumbaum, D., Raunser, S. and Bieling, P. (2024) Molecular mechanism of actin filament elongation by formins. *Science* **384**, eadn9560 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn9560

65 Boiero Sanders, M., Oosterheert, W., Hofnagel, O., Bieling, P. and Raunser, S. (2024) Phalloidin and DNase I-bound F-actin pointed end structures reveal principles of filament stabilization and disassembly. *Nat. Commun.* **15**, 7969 https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-024-52251-3

66 Palmer, N.J., Barrie, K.R. and Dominguez, R. (2024) Mechanisms of actin filament severing and elongation by formins. *Nature New Biol.* **632**, 437–442 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07637-0

67 Sear, R.P., Pagonabarraga, I. and Flaus, A. (2015) Life at the mesoscale: the self-organised cytoplasm and nucleoplasm. *BMC Biophys. 8*, 4 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13628-015-0018-6

68 Holt, L.J. and Delarue, M. (2023) Macromolecular crowding: sensing without a sensor. *Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.* **85**, 102269 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ceb.2023.102269

69 Bonucci, M., Shu, T. and Holt, L.J. (2023) How it feels in a cell. *Trends Cell Biol.* **33**, 924–938 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2023.05.002

70 Bieling, P., Li, T.D., Weichsel, J., McGorty, R., Jreij, P., Huang, B. et al. (2016) Force feedback controls motor activity and mechanical properties of self-assembling branched actin networks. *Cell* **164**, 115–127 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.057

71 Li, T.D., Bieling, P., Weichsel, J., Mullins, R.D. and Fletcher, D.A. (2022) The molecular mechanism of load adaptation by branched actin networks. *Elife* **11**, e73145 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73145

72 Cuneo, P., Magri, E., Verzola, A. and Grazi, E. (1992) “Macromolecular crowding” is a primary factor in the organization of the cytoskeleton. *Biochem. J.* **281**, 507–512 https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2810507

73 Garenne, D., Libchaber, A. and Noireaux, V. (2020) Membrane molecular crowding enhances MreB polymerization to shape synthetic cells from spheres to rods. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **117**, 1902–1909 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914656117

74 Molines, A.T., Lemière, J., Gazzola, M., Steinmark, I.E., Edrington, C.H., Hsu, C.T. et al. (2022) Physical properties of the cytoplasm modulate the rates of microtubule polymerization and depolymerization. *Dev. Cell* **57**, 466–479 https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.devcel.2022.02.001

75 Demosthene, B., Lee, M., Marracino, R.R., Heidings, J.B. and Kang, E.H. (2023) Molecular basis for actin polymerization kinetics modulated by solution crowding. *Biomolecules* **13**, 786 https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13050786

76 Watson, J.L., Seinkmane, E., Styles, C.T., Mihut, A., Krüger, L.K., McNally, K.E. et al. (2023) Macromolecular condensation buffers intracellular water potential. *Nature* **623**, 842–852 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06626-z

77 Wiesner, S., Helfer, E., Didry, D., Ducouret, G., Lafuma, F., Carlier, M.F. et al. (2003) A biomimetic motility assay provides insight into the mechanism of actin-based motility. *J. Cell Biol.* **160**, 387–398 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200207148

78 Kandiyoth, F.B. and Michelot, A. (2023) Reconstitution of actin-based cellular processes: why encapsulation changes the rules. *Eur. J. Cell Biol.* **102**, 151368 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2023.151368

79 Soares e Silva, M., Alvarado, J., Nguyen, J., Georgoulia, N., Mulder, B.M. and Koenderink, G.H. (2011) Self-organized patterns of actin filaments in cell-sized confinement. *Soft Matter* **7**, 10631 https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sm06060k

80 Fanalista, F., Birnie, A., Maan, R., Burla, F., Charles, K., Pawlik, G. et al. (2019) Shape and size control of artificial cells for bottom-up biology. *ACS Nano* **13**, 5439–5450 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b00220

81 Bashirzadeh, Y. and Liu, A.P. (2019) Encapsulation of the cytoskeleton: towards mimicking the mechanics of a cell. *Soft Matter* **15**, 8425–8436 https://doi.org/10.1039/c9sm01669d

82 Bashirzadeh, Y., Redford, S.A., Lorpaiboon, C., Groaz, A., Moghimianavval, H., Litschel, T. et al. (2021) Actin crosslinker competition and sorting drive emergent GUV size-dependent actin network architecture. *Commun. Biol.* **4**, 1136 https://doi.org/10.1038/ s42003-021-02653-6

83 Baldauf, L., Frey, F., Arribas Perez, M., Idema, T. and Koenderink, G.H. (2023) Branched actin cortices reconstituted in vesicles sense membrane curvature. *Biophys. J.* **122**, 2311–2324 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2023.02.018

84 Colin, A., Kotila, T., Guérin, C., Orhant-Prioux, M., Vianay, B., Mogilner, A. et al. (2023) Recycling of the actin monomer pool limits the lifetime of network turnover. *EMBO J.* **42**, e112717 https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2022112717

85 Guérin, C., N'Diaye, A.B., Gressin, L., Mogilner, A., Théry, M., Blanchoin, L. et al. (2025) Balancing limited resources in actin network competition. *Curr. Biol.* **35**, 500–513 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.11.067

86 Rafelski, S.M. and Theriot, J.A. (2004) Crawling toward a unified model of cell mobility: spatial and temporal regulation of actin dynamics. *Annu. Rev. Biochem.* **73**, 209–239 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073844

87 Liu, A.P. and Fletcher, D.A. (2005) Photopatterning of actin filament structures. *Nano Lett.* **5**, 625–628 https://doi.org/10.1021/ n0478878

88 Schuppler, M., Keber, F.C., Kröger, M. and Bausch, A.R. (2016) Boundaries steer the contraction of active gels. *Nat. Commun.* **7**, 13120 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13120
89 Linsmeier, I., Banerjee, S., Oakes, P.W., Jung, W., Kim, T. and Murrell, M.P. (2016) Disordered actomyosin networks are sufficient to produce cooperative and telescopic contractility. *Nat. Commun.* **7**, 12615 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12615

90 Reymann, A.C., Martiel, J.L., Cambier, T., Blanchoin, L., Boujemaa-Paterski, R. and Théry, M. (2010) Nucleation geometry governs ordered actin networks structures. *Nat. Mater.* **9**, 827–832 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2855

91 Reymann, A.C., Boujemaa-Paterski, R., Martiel, J.L., Guérin, C., Cao, W., Chin, H.F. et al. (2012) Actin network architecture can determine myosin motor activity. *Science* **336**, 1310–1314 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221708

92 Ennomani, H., Letort, G., Guérin, C., Martiel, J.L., Cao, W., Nédélec, F. et al. (2016) Architecture and connectivity govern actin network contractility. *Curr. Biol.* **26**, 616–626 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.069

93 Galland, R., Leduc, P., Guérin, C., Peyrade, D., Blanchoin, L. and Théry, M. (2013) Fabrication of three-dimensional electrical connections by means of directed actin self-organization. *Nat. Mater.* **12**, 416–421 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3569

94 Bieling, P., Hansen, S.D., Akin, O., Li, T.D., Hayden, C.C., Fletcher, D.A. et al. (2018) WH2 and proline-rich domains of WASP-family proteins collaborate to accelerate actin filament elongation. *EMBO J.* **37**, 102–121 https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201797039

95 Suzuki, E.L., Chikireddy, J., Dmitrieff, S., Guichard, B., Romet-Lemonne, G. and Jégou, A. (2020) Geometrical constraints greatly hinder formin mDia1 activity. *Nano Lett.* **20**, 22–32 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02241

96 Colin, A., Orhant-Prioux, M., Guérin, C., Savinov, M., Cao, W., Vianay, B. et al. (2023) Friction patterns guide actin network contraction. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **120**, e2300416120 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2300416120

97 Yamazaki, Y., Miyata, Y., Morigaki, K. and Miyazaki, M. (2024) Controlling physical and biochemical parameters of actin nucleation using a patterned model lipid membrane. *Nano Lett.* **24**, 1825–1834 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02742

98 Loisel, T.P., Boujemaa, R., Pantaloni, D. and Carlier, M.F. (1999) Reconstitution of actin-based motility of Listeria and Shigella using pure proteins. *Nature* **401**, 613–616 https://doi.org/10.1038/44183

99 van Oudenaarden, A., Theriot, J.A. (1999) Cooperative symmetry-breaking by actin polymerization in a model for cell motility. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **1**, 493–499 https://doi.org/10.1038/70281

100 Vignjevic, D., Yarar, D., Welch, M.D., Peloquin, J., Svitkina, T. and Borisy, G.G. (2003) Formation of filopodia-like bundles *in vitro* from a dendritic network. *J. Cell Biol.* **160**, 951–962 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200208059

101 Lacayo, C.I., Soneral, P.A.G., Zhu, J., Tsuchida, M.A., Footer, M.J., Soo, F.S. et al. (2012) Choosing orientation: influence of cargo geometry and ActA polarization on actin comet tails. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **23**, 614–629 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-06-0584

102 Bernheim-Groswasser, A., Wiesner, S., Golsteyn, R.M., Carlier, M.F. and Sykes, C. (2002) The dynamics of actin-based motility depend on surface parameters. *Nature* **417**, 308–311 https://doi.org/10.1038/417308a

103 Reymann, A.C., Suarez, C., Guérin, C., Martiel, J.L., Staiger, C.J., Blanchoin, L. et al. (2011) Turnover of branched actin filament networks by stochastic fragmentation with ADF/cofilin. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **22**, 2541–2550 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-01-0052

104 Upadhyaya, A., Chabot, J.R., Andreeva, A., Samadani, A., van OudenaardenA. (2003) Probing polymerization forces by using actin-propelled lipid vesicles. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **100**, 4521–4526 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0837027100

105 Giardini, P.A., Fletcher, D.A. and Theriot, J.A. (2003) Compression forces generated by actin comet tails on lipid vesicles. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **100**, 6493–6498 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1031670100

106 Romet-Lemonne, G., VanDuijn, M. and Dogterom, M. (2005) Three-dimensional control of protein patterning in microfabricated devices. *Nano Lett.* **5**, 2350–2354 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0507111

107 Yamamoto, S., Gaillard, J., Vianay, B., Guerin, C., Orhant-Prioux, M., Blanchoin, L. et al. (2022) Actin network architecture can ensure robust centering or sensitive decentering of the centrosome. *EMBO J.* **41**, e111631 https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2022111631

108 Alvarado, J., Mulder, B.M. and Koenderink, G.H. (2014) Alignment of nematic and bundled semiflexible polymers in cell-sized confinement. *Soft Matter* **10**, 2354–2364 https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sm52421c

109 Litschel, T. and Schwille, P. (2021) Protein reconstitution inside giant unilamellar vesicles. *Annu. Rev. Biophys.* **50**, 525–548 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-100620-114132

110 Van de Cauter, L., van Buren, L., Koenderink, G.H. and Ganzinger, K.A. (2023) Exploring giant unilamellar vesicle production for artificial cells - current challenges and future directions. *Small Methods* **7**, e2300416 https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202300416

111 Tsai, F.C., Stuhrmann, B. and Koenderink, G.H. (2011) Encapsulation of active cytoskeletal protein networks in cell-sized liposomes. *Langmuir* **27**, 10061–10071 https://doi.org/10.1021/la201604z

112 Horger, K.S., Estes, D.J., Capone, R. and Mayer, M. (2009) Films of agarose enable rapid formation of giant liposomes in solutions of physiologic ionic strength. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **131**, 1810–1819 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja805625u

113 Weinberger, A., Tsai, F.C., Koenderink, G.H., Schmidt, T.F., Itri, R., Meier, W. et al. (2013) Gel-assisted formation of giant unilamellar vesicles. *Biophys. J.* **105**, 154–164 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.024

114 Van de Cauter, L., Fanalista, F., van Buren, L., De Franceschi, N., Godino, E., Bouw, S. et al. (2021) Optimized cDICE for efficient reconstitution of biological systems in giant unilamellar vesicles. *ACS Synth. Biol.* **10**, 1690–1702 https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00068

115 Teh, S.Y., Lin, R., Hung, L.H. and Lee, A.P. (2008) Droplet microfluidics. *Lab Chip* **8**, 198–220 https://doi.org/10.1039/b715524g

116 Schwille, P., Spatz, J., Landfester, K., Bodenschatz, E., Herminghaus, S., Sourjik, V. et al. (2018) MaxSynBio: avenues towards creating cells from the bottom up. *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **57**, 13382–13392 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201802288

117 Vogel, S.K. and Schwille, P. (2012) Minimal systems to study membrane-cytoskeleton interactions. *Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.* **23**, 758–765 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2012.03.012

118 Fink, A., Doll, C.R., Yagüe Relimpio, A., Dreher, Y., Spatz, J.P., Göpfrich, K. et al. (2023) Extracellular cues govern shape and cytoskeletal organization in giant unilamellar lipid vesicles. *ACS Synth. Biol.* **12**, 369–374 https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.2c00516

119 Sakamoto, R. and Murrell, M.P. (2024) Substrate geometry and topography induce F-actin reorganization and chiral alignment in an adherent model cortex. *Cell Reports Physical Science* **5**, 102338 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102338

120 Lopes Dos Santos, R., Malo, M. and Campillo, C. (2023) Spatial control of Arp2/3-induced actin polymerization on phase-separated giant unilamellar vesicles. *ACS Synth. Biol.* **12**, 3267–3274 https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.3c00268

121 Kadzik, R.S., Homa, K.E. and Kovar, D.R. (2020) F-Actin cytoskeleton network self-organization through competition and cooperation. *Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.* **36**, 35–60 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-032320-094706
122 Senger, F., Pitaval, A., Ennomani, H., Kurzawa, L., Blanchoin, L. and Théry, M. (2019) Spatial integration of mechanical forces by α-actinin establishes actin network symmetry. *J. Cell. Sci.* **132**, jcs236604 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.236604

123 Muresan, C.G., Sun, Z.G., Yadav, V., Tabatabai, A.P., Lanier, L., Kim, J.H. et al. (2022) F-actin architecture determines constraints on myosin thick filament motion. *Nat. Commun.* **13**, 7008 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34715-6

124 Sakamoto, R. and Murrell, M.P. (2024) F-actin architecture determines the conversion of chemical energy into mechanical work. *Nat. Commun.* **15**, 3444 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47593-x

125 Gressin, L., Guillotin, A., Guérin, C., Blanchoin, L. and Michelot, A. (2015) Architecture dependence of actin filament network disassembly. *Curr. Biol.* **25**, 1437–1447 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.011

126 Manhart, A., Icheva, T.A., Guerin, C., Klar, T., Boujemaa-Paterski, R., Thery, M. et al. (2019) Quantitative regulation of the dynamic steady state of actin networks. *Elife* **8**, e42413 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42413

127 Antkowiak, A., Guillotin, A., Boiero Sanders, M., Colombo, J., Vincentelli, R. and Michelot, A. (2019) Sizes of actin networks sharing a common environment are determined by the relative rates of assembly. *Plos Biol.* **17**, e3000317 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000317

128 Boiero Sanders, M., Toret, C.P., Guillotin, A., Antkowiak, A., Vannier, T., Robinson, R.C. et al. (2022) Specialization of actin isoforms derived from the loss of key interactions with regulatory factors. *EMBO J.* **41**, e107982 https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2021107982

129 Suarez, C., Carroll, R.T., Burke, T.A., Christensen, J.R., Bestul, A.J., Sees, J.A. et al. (2015) Profilin regulates F-actin network homeostasis by favoring formin over Arp2/3 complex. *Dev. Cell* **32**, 43–53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.027

130 Pernier, J., Shekhar, S., Jegou, A., Guichard, B. and Carlier, M.F. (2016) Profilin interaction with actin filament barbed end controls dynamic instability, capping, branching, and motility. *Dev. Cell* **36**, 201–214 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.12.024

131 Suarez, C., Winkelman, J.D., Harker, A.J., Ye, H.J., McCall, P.M., Morganthaler, A.N. et al. (2023) Reconstitution of the transition from a lamellipodia- to filopodia-like actin network with purified proteins. *Eur. J. Cell Biol.* **102**, 151367 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2023.151367

132 Winkelman, J.D., Suarez, C., Hocky, G.M., Harker, A.J., Morganthaler, A.N., Christensen, J.R. et al. (2016) Fascin- and α-actinin-bundled networks contain intrinsic structural features that drive protein sorting. *Curr. Biol.* **26**, 2697–2706 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.080

133 Pantaloni, D., Boujemaa, R., Didry, D., Gounon, P. and Carlier, M.F. (2000) The Arp2/3 complex branches filament barbed ends: functional antagonism with capping proteins. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **2**, 385–391 https://doi.org/10.1038/35017011

134 Akin, O. and Mullins, R.D. (2008) Capping protein increases the rate of actin-based motility by promoting filament nucleation by the Arp2/3 complex. *Cell* **133**, 841–851 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.011

135 Funk, J., Merino, F., Schaks, M., Rottner, K., Raunser, S. and Bieling, P. (2021) A barbed end interference mechanism reveals how capping protein promotes nucleation in branched actin networks. *Nat. Commun.* **12**, 5329 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25682-5

136 Havrylenko, S., Noguera, P., Abou-Ghali, M., Manzi, J., Faqir, F., Lamora, A. et al. (2015) WAVE binds Ena/VASP for enhanced Arp2/3 complex-based actin assembly. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **26**, 55–65 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-07-1200

137 Bugyi, B., Didry, D. and Carlier, M.F. (2010) How tropomyosin regulates lamellipodial actin-based motility: a combined biochemical and reconstituted motility approach. *EMBO J.* **29**, 14–26 https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.316

138 Hsiao, J.Y., Goins, L.M., Petek, N.A. and Mullins, R.D. (2015) Arp2/3 complex and cofilin modulate binding of tropomyosin to branched actin networks. *Curr. Biol.* **25**, 1573–1582 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.038

139 Helfer, E., Nevalainen, E.M., Naumanen, P., Romero, S., Didry, D., Pantaloni, D. et al. (2006) Mammalian twinfilin sequesters ADP-G-actin and caps filament barbed ends: implications in motility. *EMBO J.* **25**, 1184–1195 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601019

140 Hansen, S.D. and Mullins, R.D. (2015) Lamellipodin promotes actin assembly by clustering Ena/VASP proteins and tethering them to actin filaments. *Elife* **4**, e06585 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06585

141 Xu, M., Rutkowski, D.M., Rebowski, G., Boczkowska, M., Pollard, L.W., Dominguez, R. et al. (2024) Myosin-I synergizes with Arp2/3 complex to enhance the pushing forces of branched actin networks. *Sci. Adv.* **10**, eado5788 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ado5788

142 Boiero Sanders, M., Antkowiak, A. and Michelot, A. (2020) Diversity from similarity: cellular strategies for assigning particular identities to actin filaments and networks. *Open Biol.* **10**, 200157 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.200157

143 Kotila, T., Wioland, H., Selvaraj, M., Kogan, K., Antenucci, L., Jégou, A. et al. (2022) Structural basis of rapid actin dynamics in the evolutionarily divergent leishmania parasite. *Nat. Commun.* **13**, 3442 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31068-y

144 Wirshing, A.C.E., Rodriguez, S.G. and Goode, B.L. (2023) Evolutionary tuning of barbed end competition allows simultaneous construction of architecturally distinct actin structures. *J. Cell Biol.* **222**, e202209105 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202209105

145 Hvorecny, K.L., Sladewski, T.E., De La Cruz, E.M., Kollman, J.M. and Heaslip, A.T. (2024) Toxoplasma gondii actin filaments are tuned for rapid disassembly and turnover. *Nat. Commun.* **15**, 1840 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46111-3

146 Qin, W., Hu, C., Gu, S., Zhang, J., Jiang, C., Chai, X. et al. (2024) Dynamic shape-shifting of the single-celled eukaryotic predator Lacrymaria via unconventional cytoskeletal components. *Curr. Biol.* **34**, 4869–4883 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.09.003

147 Pimm, M.L. and Henty-Ridilla, J.L. (2021) New twists in actin-microtubule interactions. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **32**, 211–217 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-09-0491

148 Farina, F., Gaillard, J., Guérin, C., Couté, Y., Sillibourne, J., Blanchoin, L. et al. (2016) The centrosome is an actin-organizing centre. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **18**, 65–75 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3285

149 Inoue, D., Obino, D., Pineau, J., Farina, F., Gaillard, J., Guerin, C. et al. (2019) Actin filaments regulate microtubule growth at the centrosome. *EMBO J.* **38**, e99630 https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201899630

150 Gélin, M., Schaeffer, A., Gaillard, J., Guérin, C., Vianay, B., Orhant-Prioux, M. et al. (2023) Microtubules under mechanical pressure can breach dense actin networks. *J. Cell. Sci.* **136**, jcs261667 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.261667

151 Kučera, O., Gaillard, J., Guérin, C., Théry, M. and Blanchoin, L. (2022) Actin-microtubule dynamic composite forms responsive active matter with memory. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **119**, e2209522119 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209522119

152 Kučera, O., Gaillard, J., Guérin, C., Utzschneider, C., Théry, M. and Blanchoin, L. (2022) Actin architecture steers microtubules in active cytoskeletal composite. *Nano Lett.* **22**, 8584–8591 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c03117

153 Plastino, J. and Blanchoin, L. (2017) Adaptive actin networks. *Dev. Cell* **42**, 565–566 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.09.005
154 Plastino, J. and Blanchoin, L. (2019) Dynamic stability of the actin ecosystem. *J. Cell. Sci.* **132**, jcs219832 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.219832

155 Banerjee, S., Gardel, M.L. and Schwarz, U.S. (2020) The actin cytoskeleton as an active adaptive material. *Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.* **11**, 421–439 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013231

156 Théry, M. and Blanchoin, L. (2024) Reconstituting the dynamic steady states of actin networks *in vitro*. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **26**, 494–497
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-024-01379-x

157 McCall, P.M., MacKintosh, F.C., Kovar, D.R. and Gardel, M.L. (2019) Cofilin drives rapid turnover and fluidization of entangled F-actin. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **116**, 12629–12637 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818808116

158 Guo, S., Hoeprich, G.J., Magliozzi, J.O., Gelles, J. and Goode, B.L. (2023) Dynamic remodeling of actin networks by cyclase-associated protein and CAP-Abp1 complexes. *Curr. Biol.* **33**, 4484–4495 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.09.032

159 Ingerman, E., Hsiao, J.Y. and Mullins, R.D. (2013) Arp2/3 complex ATP hydrolysis promotes lamellipodial actin network disassembly but is dispensable for assembly. *J. Cell Biol.* **200**, 619–633 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201211069

160 Romero, S., Le Clainche, C., Didry, D., Egile, C., Pantaloni, D. and Carlier, M.F. (2004) Formin is a processive motor that requires profilin to accelerate actin assembly and associated ATP hydrolysis. *Cell* **119**, 419–429 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.039

161 Chikireddy, J., Lengagne, L., Le Borgne, R., Durieu, C., Wioland, H., Romet-Lemonne, G. et al. (2024) Fascin-induced bundling protects actin filaments from disassembly by cofilin. *J. Cell Biol.* **223**, e202312106 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202312106

162 Pollard, L.W., Garabedian, M.V., Alioto, S.L., Shekhar, S. and Goode, B.L. (2020) Genetically inspired *in vitro* reconstitution of *Saccharomyces cerevisiae* actin cables from seven purified proteins. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **31**, 335–347 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-10-0576

163 Bleicher, P., Sciortino, A. and Bausch, A.R. (2020) The dynamics of actin network turnover is self-organized by a growth-depletion feedback. *Sci. Rep.* **10**, 6215 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62942-8

164 Raz-Ben Aroush, D., Ofer, N., Abu-Shah, E., Allard, J., Krichevsky, O., Mogilner, A. et al. (2017) Actin turnover in lamellipodial fragments. *Curr. Biol.* **27**, 2963–2973 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.066

165 Mohapatra, L., Goode, B.L. and Kondev, J. (2015) Antenna mechanism of length control of actin cables. *Plos Comput. Biol.* **11**, e1004160
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004160

166 Mohapatra, L., Goode, B.L., Jelenkovic, P., Phillips, R. and Kondev, J. (2016) Design principles of length control of cytoskeletal structures. *Annu. Rev. Biophys.* **45**, 85–116 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070915-094206

167 Mohapatra, L., Lagny, T.J., Harbage, D., Jelenkovic, P.R. and Kondev, J. (2017) The limiting-pool mechanism fails to control the size of multiple organelles. *Cell Syst.* **4**, 559–567 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2017.04.011

168 Banerjee, D.S. and Banerjee, S. (2022) Size regulation of multiple organelles competing for a limiting subunit pool. *Plos Comput. Biol.* **18**, e1010253 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010253

169 Banerjee, D.S. and Banerjee, S. (2022) Emergence and maintenance of variable-length actin filaments in a limiting pool of building blocks. *Biophys. J.* **121**, 2436–2448 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2022.05.014

170 Helfer, E., Harlepp, S., Bourdieu, L., Robert, J., MacKintosh, F.C. and Chatenay, D. (2001) Viscoelastic properties of actin-coated membranes. *Phys. Rev. E* **63**, 021904 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.021904

171 Gardel, M.L., Shin, J.H., MacKintosh, F.C., Mahadevan, L., Matsudaira, P. and Weitz, D.A. (2004) Elastic behavior of cross-linked and bundled actin networks. *Science* **304**, 1301–1305 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095087

172 Wong, I.Y., Gardel, M.L., Reichman, D.R., Weeks, E.R., Valentine, M.T., Bausch, A.R. et al. (2004) Anomalous diffusion probes microstructure dynamics of entangled F-actin networks. *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **92**, 178101–1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.178101

173 Bendix, P.M., Koenderink, G.H., Cuvelier, D., Dogic, Z., Koeleman, B.N., Brieher, W.M. et al. (2008) A quantitative analysis of contractility in active cytoskeletal protein networks. *Biophys. J.* **94**, 3126–3136 https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.117960

174 Alvarado, J., Sheinman, M., Sharma, A., MacKintosh, F.C. and Koenderink, G.H. (2013) Molecular motors robustly drive active gels to a critically connected state. *Nat. Phys.* **9**, 591–597 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2715

175 Soares e Silva, M., Stuhrmann, B., Betz, T. and Koenderink, G.H. (2014) Time-resolved microrheology of actively remodeling actomyosin networks. *New J. Phys.* **16**, 075010 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/7/075010

176 Noireaux, V., Golsteyn, R.M., Friederich, E., Prost, J., Antony, C., Louvard, D. et al. (2000) Growing an actin gel on spherical surfaces. *Biophys. J.* **78**, 1643–1654 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76716-6

177 Kawska, A., Carvalho, K., Manzi, J., Boujemaa-Paterski, R., Blanchoin, L., Martiel, J.L. et al. (2012) How actin network dynamics control the onset of actin-based motility. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **109**, 14440–14445 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117096109

178 Pujol, T., du Roure, O., Fermigier, M. and Heuvingh, J. (2012) Impact of branching on the elasticity of actin networks. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **109**, 10364–10369 https://doi.org/10.1038/pnas.1121238109

179 van der Gucht, J., Paluch, E., Plastino, J. and Sykes, C. (2005) Stress release drives symmetry breaking for actin-based movement. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **102**, 7847–7852 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502121102

180 Paluch, E., van der Gucht, J., Joanny, J.F. and Sykes, C. (2006) Deformations in actin comets from rocketing beads. *Biophys. J.* **91**, 3113–3122 https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.088054

181 Marcy, Y., Joanny, J.F., Prost, J. and Sykes, C. (2007) Probing friction in actin-based motility. *New J. Phys.* **9**, 431–431 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/9/11/431

182 Marcy, Y., Prost, J., Carlier, M.F. and Sykes, C. (2004) Forces generated during actin-based propulsion: A direct measurement by micromanipulation. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **101**, 5992–5997 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307704101

183 Delatour, V., Shekhar, S., Reymann, A.C., Didry, D., Lé, K.H.D., Romet-Lemonne, G. et al. (2008) Actin-based propulsion of functionalized hard versus fluid spherical objects. *New J. Phys.* **10**, 025001 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/2/025001

184 Delatour, V., Helfer, E., Didry, D., Lé, K.H.D., Gaucher, J.F., Carlier, M.F. et al. (2008) Arp2/3 controls the motile behavior of N-WASP-functionalized GUVs and modulates N-WASP surface distribution by mediating transient links with actin filaments. *Biophys. J.* **94**, 4890–4905 https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.118653

185 Achard, V., Martiel, J.L., Michelot, A., Guérin, C., Reymann, A.C., Blanchoin, L. et al. (2010) A "primer"-based mechanism underlies branched actin filament network formation and motility. *Curr. Biol.* **20**, 423–428 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.056
186 Mueller, J., Szep, G., Nemethova, M., Lieber, A.D., Winkler, C. et al. (2017) Load adaptation of lamellipodial actin networks. *Cell* **171**, 188–200 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.051

187 Boujemaa-Paterski, R., Suarez, C., Klar, T., Zhu, J., Guérin, C., Mogilner, A. et al. (2017) Network heterogeneity regulates steering in actin-based motility. *Nat. Commun.* **8**, 655 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00455-1

188 Ciobanasu, C., Fairev, B. and Le Clainche, C. (2014) Actomyosin-dependent formation of the mechanosensitive talin-vinculin complex reinforces actin anchoring. *Nat. Commun.* **5**, 3095 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4095

189 Vigouroux, C., Henriot, V. and Le Clainche, C. (2020) Talin dissociates from RIAM and associates to vinculin sequentially in response to the actomyosin force. *Nat. Commun.* **11**, 3116 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16922-1

190 Boujemaa-Paterski, R., Martins, B., Eibauer, M., Beales, C.T., Geiger, B. and Medalia, O. (2020) Talin-activated vinculin interacts with branched actin networks to initiate bundles. *Elife* **9**, e53990 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53990

191 Siton-Mendelson, O. and Bernheim-Groswasser, A. (2016) Toward the reconstitution of synthetic cell motility. *Cell Adh. Migr.* **10**, 461–474 https://doi.org/10.1080/19336918.2016.1170260

192 Pernier, J., Cardoso Dos Santos, M., Souissi, M., Joly, A., Narassimprakash, H., Rossier, O. et al. (2023) Talin and kindlin cooperate to control the density of integrin clusters. *J. Cell. Sci.* **136**, jcs260746 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.260746

193 Salbreux, G., Charras, G. and Paluch, E. (2012) Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis. *Trends Cell Biol.* **22**, 536–545 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2012.07.001

194 Diz-Muñoz, A., Fletcher, D.A. and Weiner, O.D. (2013) Use the force: membrane tension as an organizer of cell shape and motility. *Trends Cell Biol.* **23**, 47–53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2012.09.006

195 Kaplan, C., Kenny, S.J., Chen, X., Schöneberg, J., Sitarska, E., Diz-Muñoz, A. et al. (2022) Load adaptation by endocytic actin networks. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **33**, ar50 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E21-11-0589

196 Chugh, P., Clark, A.G., Smith, M.B., Cassani, D.A.D., Dierkes, K., Ragab, A. et al. (2017) Actin cortex architecture regulates cell surface tension. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **19**, 689–697 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3525

197 Sitarska, E. and Diz-Muñoz, A. (2020) Pay attention to membrane tension: mechanobiology of the cell surface. *Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.* **66**, 11–18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2020.04.001

198 De Belly, H. and Weiner, O.D. (2024) Follow the flow: actin and membrane act as an integrated system to globally coordinate cell shape and movement. *Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.* **89**, 102392 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2024.102392

199 Murrell, M.P. and Gardel, M.L. (2012) F-actin buckling coordinates contractility and severing in a biomimetic actomyosin cortex. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **109**, 20820–20825 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214753109

200 Vogel, S.K., Petrasek, Z., Heinemann, F. and Schwille, P. (2013) Myosin motors fragment and compact membrane-bound actin filaments. *Elife* **2**, e00116 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00116

201 Liebe, N.L., Mey, I., Vuong, L., Shikho, F., Geil, B., Janshoff, A. et al. (2023) Bioinspired membrane interfaces: controlling actomyosin architecture and contractility. *ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces* **15**, 11586–11598 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmami.3c00061

202 Nast-Kolb, T., Bleicher, P., Payr, M. and Bausch, A.R. (2022) VASP localization to lipid bilayers induces polymerization driven actin bundle formation. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **33**, ar91 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E21-11-0577

203 Sonal, S., Ganzinger, K.A., Vogel, S.K., Mücksch, J., Blumhardt, P. and Schwille, P. (2019) Myosin-II activity generates a dynamic steady state with continuous actin turnover in a minimal actin cortex. *J. Cell. Sci.* **132**, jcs219899 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.219899

204 Liu, A.P. and Fletcher, D.A. (2006) Actin polymerization serves as a membrane domain switch in model lipid bilayers. *Biophys. J.* **91**, 4064–4070 https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.090852

205 Köster, D.V., Husain, K., Iljazi, E., Bhat, A., Bieling, P., Mullins, R.D. et al. (2016) Actomyosin dynamics drive local membrane component organization in an in vitro active composite layer. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **113**, E1645–54 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514030113

206 Vogel, S.K., Greiss, F., Khmelinskaia, A. and Schwille, P. (2017) Control of lipid domain organization by a biomimetic contractile actomyosin cortex. *Elife* **6**, e24350 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24350

207 Banjade, S. and Rosen, M.K. (2014) Phase transitions of multivalent proteins can promote clustering of membrane receptors. *Elife* **3**, 1–24 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04123

208 Lopes Dos Santos, R. and Campillo, C. (2022) Studying actin-induced cell shape changes using giant unilamellar vesicles and reconstituted actin networks. *Biochem. Soc. Trans.* **50**, 1527–1539 https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20220900

209 Pontani, L.-L., Van der Gucht, J., Salbreux, G., Heuvingh, J., Joanny, J.-F. and Sykes, C. (2009) Reconstitution of an actin cortex inside a liposome. *Biophys. J.* **96**, 192–198 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.029

210 Carvalho, K., Tsai, F.C., Lees, E., Voituriez, R., Koenderink, G.H. and Sykes, C. (2013) Cell-sized liposomes reveal how actomyosin cortical tension drives shape change. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **110**, 16456–16461 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221524110

211 Loiseau, E., Schneider, J.A.M., Keber, F.C., Pelzl, C., Massiera, G., Salbreux, G. et al. (2016) Shape remodeling and blebbing of active cytoskeletal vesicles. *Sci. Adv.* **2**, e1500465 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500465

212 Tsai, F.C. and Koenderink, G.H. (2015) Shape control of lipid bilayer membranes by confined actin bundles. *Soft Matter* **11**, 8834–8847 https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sm01583a

213 Litschel, T., Kelley, C.F., Holz, D., Adeli Koudehi, M., Vogel, S.K., Burbura, L. et al. (2021) Reconstitution of contractile actomyosin rings in vesicles. *Nat. Commun.* **12**, 2254 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22422-7

214 Bashirzadeh, Y., Moghimianavval, H. and Liu, A.P. (2022) Encapsulated actomyosin patterns drive cell-like membrane shape changes. *iScience* **25**, 104236 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104236

215 Dürre, K., Keber, F.C., Bleicher, P., Brauns, F., Cyron, C.J., Faix, J. et al. (2018) Capping protein-controlled actin polymerization shapes lipid membranes. *Nat. Commun.* **9**, 1630 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03918-1

216 Liu, A.P., Richmond, D.L., Maibaum, L., Pronk, S., Geissler, P.L. and Fletcher, D.A. (2008) Membrane-induced bundling of actin filaments. *Nat. Phys.* **4**, 789–793 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1071

217 Simon, C., Kusters, R., Caorsi, V., Allard, A., Abou-Ghali, M., Manzi, J. et al. (2019) Actin dynamics drive cell-like membrane deformation. *Nat. Phys.* **15**, 602–609 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0464-1

218 Allard, A., Bouzid, M., Betz, T., Simon, C., Abou-Ghali, M., Lemière, J. et al. (2020) Actin modulates shape and mechanics of tubular membranes. *Sci. Adv.* **6**, eaaz3050 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.eaz3050
219 Gat, S., Simon, C., Campillo, C., Bernheim-Groswasser, A. and Sykes, C. (2020) Finger-like membrane protrusions are favored by heterogeneities in the actin network. *Soft Matter* **16**, 7222–7230 https://doi.org/10.1039/c9sm02444a

220 Miyazaki, M., Chiba, M., Eguchi, H., Ohki, T. and Ishiwata, S. (2015) Cell-sized spherical confinement induces the spontaneous formation of contractile actomyosin rings *in vitro*. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **17**, 480–489 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3142

221 Sakamoto, R. and Murrell, M.P. (2024) Mechanical power is maximized during contractile ring-like formation in a biomimetic dividing cell model. *Nat. Commun.* **15**, 9731 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53228-y

222 Reverte-López, M., Kanwa, N., Qutbuddin, Y., Belousova, V., Jasnin, M. and Schwille, P. (2024) Self-organized spatial targeting of contractile actomyosin rings for synthetic cell division. *Nat. Commun.* **15**, 10415 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54807-9

223 Tsai, F.C., Henderson, J.M., Jarin, Z., Kremneva, E., Senju, Y., Pernier, J. et al. (2022) Activated I-BAR IRSp53 clustering controls the formation of VASP-actin-based membrane protrusions. *Sci. Adv.* **8**, eabp8677 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abp8677

224 Ross, J.L., Ali, M.Y. and Warshaw, D.M. (2008) Cargo transport: molecular motors navigate a complex cytoskeleton. *Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.* **20**, 41–47 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2007.11.006

225 Lombardo, A.T., Nelson, S.R., Kennedy, G.G., Trybus, K.M., Walcott, S. and Warshaw, D.M. (2019) Myosin Va transport of liposomes in three-dimensional actin networks is modulated by actin filament density, position, and polarity. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **116**, 8326–8335 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901176116

226 McIntosh, B.B., Pyrpassopoulos, S., Holzbaur, E.L.F. and Ostap, E.M. (2018) Opposing kinesin and myosin-I motors drive membrane deformation and tubulation along engineered cytoskeletal networks. *Curr. Biol.* **28**, 236–248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.007

227 Tsai, F.C., Guérin, G., Pernier, J. and Bassereau, P. (2024) Actin-membrane linkers: Insights from synthetic reconstituted systems. *Eur. J. Cell Biol.* **103**, 151402 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2024.151402

228 Garner, R.M., Molines, A.T., Theriot, J.A. and Chang, F. (2023) Vast heterogeneity in cytoplasmic diffusion rates revealed by nanorheology and doppelgänger simulations. *Biophys. J.* **122**, 767–783 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2023.01.040

229 Dinet, C. and Michelot, A. (2023) pH gradients guide ADF/cofilin isoforms in pollen tubes. *J. Cell Biol.* **222**, e202310012 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202310012

230 Wang, J., Shen, J., Xu, Y., Jiang, Y., Qu, X., Zhao, W. et al. (2023) Differential sensitivity of ADF isovariants to a pH gradient promotes pollen tube growth. *J. Cell Biol.* **222**, e202206074 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202206074

231 Trantidou, T., Friddin, M., Elani, Y., Brooks, N.J., Law, R.V., Seddon, J.M. et al. (2017) Engineering compartmentalized biomimetic micro- and nanocontainers. *ACS Nano* **11**, 6549–6565 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b03245

232 Cho, E. and Lu, Y. (2020) Compartmentalizing cell-free systems: toward creating life-like artificial cells and beyond. *ACS Synth. Biol.* **9**, 2881–2901 https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00433

233 Bonnemay, L., Hostachy, S., Hoffmann, C., Gautier, J. and Gueroui, Z. (2013) Engineering spatial gradients of signaling proteins using magnetic nanoparticles. *Nano Lett.* **13**, 5147–5152 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl402356b

234 Bonnemay, L., Hoffmann, C. and Gueroui, Z. (2015) Remote control of signaling pathways using magnetic nanoparticles. *WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol.* **7**, 342–354 https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1313

235 Case, L.B., Zhang, X., Ditlev, J.A. and Rosen, M.K. (2019) Stoichiometry controls activity of phase-separated clusters of actin signaling proteins. *Science* **363**, 1093–1097 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6313

236 Groaz, A., Moghimianavval, H., Tavella, F., Giessen, T.W., Vecchiarelli, A.G., Yang, Q. et al. (2021) Engineering spatiotemporal organization and dynamics in synthetic cells. *Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol.* **13**, e1685 https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1685

237 Jia, H., Flommersfeld, J., Heymann, M., Vogel, S.K., Franquelim, H.G., Brückner, D.B. et al. (2022) 3D printed protein-based robotic structures actuated by molecular motor assemblies. *Nat. Mater.* **21**, 703–709 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01258-6