94. Kraxner, F., Nordstrom, E.-M., Havlik, P., Gusti, M., Mosnier, A., Frank, S., Valin, H., Fritz, S., Fuss, S., Kindermann, G., et al. (2013). Global bioenergy scenarios - Future forest development, land-use implications, and trade-offs. *Biomass & Bioenergy* **57**, 86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.003.

95. Searle, S., and Malins, C. (2015). A reassessment of global bioenergy potential in 2050. *GCB Bioenergy* **7*, 328-336. doi:: 10.1111/gcbb.12141.

96. Searle, S.Y., and Malins, C.J. (2014). Will energy crop yields meet expectations? *Biomass and Bioenergy* **65**, 3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.001.

97. Schueler, V., Fuss, S., Steckel, J.C., Weddige, U., and Beringer, T. (2016). Productivity ranges of sustainable biomass potentials from non-agricultural land. *Environmental Research Letters* **11**. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074026.

98. Schueler, V., Weddige, U., Beringer, T., Gamba, L., and Lamers, P. (2013). Global biomass potentials under sustainability restrictions defined by the European Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC. *Global Change Biology* *Bioenergy* **5**, 652-663. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12036.

99. Blanco-Canqui, H. (2016). Growing Dedicated Energy Crops on Marginal Lands and Ecosystem Services. *Soil Science Society of America Journal* **80**, 845-858. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2016.03.0080.

100. Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H., and Plutzar, C. (2012). Dependency of global primary bioenergy crop potentials in 2050 on food systems, yields, biodiversity conservation and political stability doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.066.

101. Henry, R.C., Engstrom, K., Olin, S., Alexander, P., Arneth, A., and Rounsevell, M.D.A. (2018). Food supply and bioenergy production within the global cropland planetary boundary. *Plos One* **13**, e0194695-e0194695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194695.

102. Humpenoeder, F., Popp, A., Bodirsky, B.L., Weindl, I., Biewald, A., Lotze-Campen, H., Dietrich, J.P., Klein, D., Kreidenweis, U., Mueller, C., et al. (2018). Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs? *Environmental Research Letters* **13**. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b.

103. Krause, A., Pugh, T.A.M., Bayer, A.D., Li, W., Leung, F., Bondeau, A., Doelman, J.C., Humpenoder, F., Anthoni, P., Bodirsky, B.L., et al. (2018). Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land-based climate-change mitigation efforts. *Global Change Biology*. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14144.

104. Harper, A.B., Powell, T., Cox, P.M., House, J., Huntingford, C., Lenton, T.M., Sitch, S., Burke, E., Chadburn, S.E., Collins, W.J., et al. (2018). Land-use emissions play a critical role in landbased mitigation for Paris climate targets. *Nature Communications* **9**, 2938. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05340-z.

105. Harris, Z.M., Spake, R., and Taylor, G. (2015). Land use change to bioenergy: A meta-analysis of soil carbon and GHG emissions. *Biomass & Bioenergy* **82**, 27-39. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.05.008.

106. Ter-Mikaelian, M., J. Colombo, S., and Chen, J. (2015). The Burning Question: Does Forest Bioenergy Reduce Carbon Emissions? A Review of Common Misconceptions about Forest Carbon Accounting doi: 10.5849/jof.14-016.

107. Kato, E., and Yamagata, Y. (2014). BECCS capability of dedicated bioenergy crops under a future land-use scenario targeting net negative carbon emissions. *Earth's Future* **2**, 421-439. doi: 10.1002/2014ef000249.

108. Krause, A., Pugh, T.A.M., Bayer, A.D., Doelman, J.C., Humpenoder, F., Anthoni, P., Olin, S., Bodirsky, B.L., Popp, A., Stehfest, E., and Arneth, A. (2017). Global consequences of afforestation and bioenergy cultivation on ecosystem service indicators. *Biogeosciences* **14**, 4829-4850. doi: 10.5194/bg-14-4829-2017.

109. Favero, A., Mendelsohn, R., and Sohngen, B. (2017). Using forests for climate mitigation: sequester carbon or produce woody biomass? *Climatic Change* **144**, 195-206. doi: 10.1007/s10584-017-2034-9.

110. Reilly, J., Melillo, J., Cai, Y.X., Kicklighter, D., Gurgel, A., Paltsev, S., Cronin, T., Sokolov, A., and Schlosser, A. (2012). Using Land To Mitigate Climate Change: Hitting the Target, Recognizing the Trade-offs. *Environmental Science & Technology* **46**, 5672-5679. doi: 10.1021/es2034729.

111. van Meijl, H., Havlik, P., Lotze-Campen, H., Stehfest, E., Witzke, P., Domínguez, I.P., Bodirsky, B.L., van Dijk, M., Doelman, J., Fellmann, T., et al. (2018). Comparing impacts of climate change and mitigation on global agriculture by 2050. *Environmental Research Letters* **13**, 064021. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aabdc4.
112. Robledo-Abad, C., Althaus, H.-J., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Corbera, E., Creutzig, F., Garcia-Ulloa, J., Geddes, A., Gregg, J.S., Haberl, H., et al. (2017). Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited. *Global Change Biology Bioenergy* 9, 541-556. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12338.

113. Popp, A., Calvin, K., Fujimori, S., Havlik, P., Humpenöder, F., Stehfest, E., Bodirsky, B.L., Dietrich, J.P., Doelmann, J.C., Gusti, M., et al. (2017). Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. *Global Environmental Change* 42, 331-345. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.doi: 10.002.

114. Hasegawa, T., Fujimori, S., Havlik, P., Valin, H., Bodirsky, B.L., Doelman, J.C., Fellmann, T., Kyle, P., Koopman, J.F.L., Lotze-Campen, H., et al. (2018). Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy. *Nature Climate Change* 8, 699-+. doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0230-x.