# Multidisciplinary Integration in Zoology Education: Bridging Biological, Computational, and Environmental Sciences

Gopal Anapana, Shivaganesh Donkada, Nagaraju Surarapu, Venkata

Rathnamma V

► To cite this version:

Gopal Anapana, Shivaganesh Donkada, Nagaraju Surarapu, Venkata Rathnamma V. Multidisciplinary Integration in Zoology Education: Bridging Biological, Computational, and Environmental Sciences. UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2025, 46 (8), pp.317-331. 10.56557/up-joz/2025/v46i84916. hal-05032209

HAL Id: hal-05032209

https://hal.science/hal-05032209v1

Submitted on 13 Apr 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Multidisciplinary Integration in Zoology Education: Bridging Biological, Computational, and Environmental Sciences

Gopal Anapana a++*, Shivaganesh Donkada a++, Nagaraju Surarapu a++ and Venkata Rathnamma V b#

## Authors' contributions

This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. Author GA conceptualized the study, did the methodology, formal analysis, investigation, wrote the original draft of the manuscript and did the visualization. Author SD did the data curation, software, validation, writing, review & editing the manuscript. Author NS did the methodology, data curation, validation, writing, review & editing the manuscript. Author VRV did the supervision, resources, project administration, writing, review & editing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

## Article Information

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56557/upjoz/2025/v46i84916

**Open Peer Review History:**

This journal follows the Advanced Open Peer Review policy. Identity of the Reviewers, Editor(s) and additional Reviewers, peer review comments, different versions of the manuscript, comments of the editors, etc are available here: https://prh mbimph com/review-history/4799

Received: 08/02/2025

Accepted: 10/04/2025

Published: 12/04/2025

**Original Research Article**

<footnote>a Department of Zoology, Maharajah's College Autonomous Vizianagaram - 535002, Andhra Pradesh, India.</footnote>

<footnote>b Department of Zoology & Aquaculture, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur - 522510, Andhra Pradesh, India.</footnote>

<footnote>**++** Assistant Professor;</footnote>

<footnote>**# Professor;**</footnote>

<footnote>**\*Corresponding author: Email: gopalzoology@gmail.com;**</footnote>
ABSTRACT

Interdisciplinary education is becoming increasingly essential in zoology to equip students for complex scientific and real-world challenges. The integration of multidisciplinary approaches— drawing from genetics, bioinformatics, biomechanics, veterinary medicine, and environmental sciences – enhances student learning, engagement, and problem-solving skills. Using a mixed-methods design, this study combined a systematic literature review with a large-scale survey of over 3,500 zoology students and educators across multiple institutions. Data were collected over six months through structured questionnaires and faculty interviews to compare traditional and interdisciplinary teaching models. A comparative analysis of pre- and post-test assessments, engagement surveys, and faculty evaluations revealed a 15% improvement (Table 1) in conceptual application scores for students exposed to interdisciplinary modules (p = 3.48 × 10⁻¹⁹), with the highest gains observed in bioinformatics and biomechanics-based curricula. Engagement levels also increased significantly, averaging 4.8/5 and 4.6/5, respectively (Table 2), compared to 3.4/5 in traditional instruction. Faculty perspectives identified key implementation challenges, including curriculum constraints, faculty training gaps, and resource limitations, which are addressed through modular curriculum redesign, targeted faculty development programs, and digital learning investments. By adopting interdisciplinary educational strategies, zoology programs can better prepare students for careers in research, conservation, biotechnology, and ecological sustainability, equipping them with the skills needed to navigate and address complex global challenges.

Keywords: Multidisciplinary education; zoology; interdisciplinary learning; STEM education; Bioinformatics; conservation biology; veterinary sciences; educational innovation.

1. INTRODUCTION

The field of zoology has evolved beyond its
traditional focus on classification and physiology
into an interdisciplinary field that integrates
genetics, bioinformatics, biomechanics, and
environmental science. This transformation is
driven by the increasing complexity of biological
questions and global challenges that necessitate
cross-disciplinary expertise. The integration of
computational biology and bioinformatics, for
example, has significantly advanced genetic
research and molecular system analyses (Alves
et al., 2008). Similarly, citizen science initiatives
and environmental education have broadened
the scope of zoological research, fostering
sustainability and conservation awareness
(Ballard et al., 2024). Additionally, artificial
intelligence (AI) is reshaping zoological studies
by enabling species classification, ecological
monitoring, and evolutionary modeling (Saba &
Balwan, 2025). These advancements highlight
the need for a modernized, multidisciplinary
approach to zoology education that equips
students with the problem-solving skills
necessary to navigate contemporary scientific
and technological challenges (Osman et al.,
2013; Hanisch & Eirdosh, 2020).

1.1 Problem Statement

Despite the clear benefits of interdisciplinary
education, traditional zoology curricula remain

largely discipline-specific and often fail to
integrate modern technological and
computational advancements. This lack of
interdisciplinary exposure may hinder students'
ability to apply zoological concepts to real-world
challenges, particularly in fields such as
biomedical research, ecological modeling, and
bioengineering. Moreover, although
interdisciplinary approaches have been widely
adopted in fields such as medicine and
environmental science, their systematic
incorporation into zoology education remains
inconsistent. Addressing these gaps is crucial for
ensuring that students are prepared for the
demands of contemporary scientific research and
industrial applications.

1.2 Research Gap

While prior studies have explored the integration
of individual interdisciplinary components, such
as biomechanics in bioinspired robotics (Mo et
al., 2020) and AI in conservation biology
(Pettorelli et al., 2024)-there is limited research
on the comprehensive impact of a
multidisciplinary curriculum on student learning
outcomes and engagement in zoology education.
The existing literature primarily focuses on case-
specific applications rather than a holistic
assessment of interdisciplinary teaching
methods. In our previous work, we examined
innovative instructional strategies in zoology
education, particularly focusing on enhancing student engagement through thematic and experiential learning modules. However, those studies were limited to single-discipline approaches. This study fills this gap by systematically analyzing the effects of incorporating biomechanics, bioinformatics, and ecological modeling into zoology education, providing empirical evidence of its impact on student performance, engagement, and faculty perspectives.

## 1.3 Research Objective and Hypothesis

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach in zoology education by addressing the following research question:

Does integrating interdisciplinary elements such as biomechanics, bioinformatics, and ecological modeling enhance student learning outcomes, engagement levels, and faculty acceptance compared with traditional zoology teaching methods?

Based on prior research and preliminary observations, we hypothesize that:

1. Student Performance: Students exposed to interdisciplinary teaching will demonstrate statistically significant improvements in academic performance compared with those in traditional zoology courses.

2. Engagement Levels: Interdisciplinary teaching leads to higher student engagement, particularly in applied and technology-driven topics.

3. Faculty Perception: Faculty will acknowledge the benefits of interdisciplinary teaching but may highlight challenges such as curriculum constraints and resource limitations.

## 1.4 Significance of the Study

By providing empirical evidence on the benefits and challenges of interdisciplinary education in zoology, this study contributes to the ongoing discussions on curriculum reform. These findings can inform educational policymakers, curriculum designers, and instructors in developing more adaptive and application-driven learning models that align with the evolving demands of the field. Additionally, the study offers insights into overcoming barriers, such as faculty expertise gaps and resource constraints, ultimately fostering a more integrative and innovative approach to zoology education.

# 2. LITERATURE REVIEW

## 2.1 The Importance of Multidisciplinary Approaches in Science Education

Multidisciplinary learning has become a cornerstone of modern science education, particularly in life sciences, where fields such as genetics, ecology, bioinformatics, and biophysics are inherently interconnected. Research has highlighted that integrating diverse scientific disciplines enhances critical thinking (Hwang et al., 2024), stimulates innovation (Pathak & Sheth, 2023), and strengthens problem-solving abilities by providing students with broader analytical perspectives (Scherer & Beckmann, 2014). Furthermore, interdisciplinary approaches in STEM education have been shown to improve student engagement and academic achievement, particularly for learners facing challenges in traditional siloed educational models (Hwang et al., 2024).

The integration of zoology with biomechanics and robotics has led to groundbreaking innovations in prosthetic design because studies on animal locomotion have directly influenced the development of robotic limbs and adaptive prosthetics (van der Geest & Garcia, 2023). Similarly, advances in molecular genetics and computational biology have revolutionized conservation strategies by identifying genetic variations that are crucial for species preservation (Khan et al., 2016). These developments highlight the growing necessity of interdisciplinary education, as traditional single-discipline approaches may no longer be sufficient to equip students with the complex challenges of the modern biological sciences.

## 2.2 Multidisciplinary Applications in Zoology Education

Zoology has traditionally been regarded as a descriptive discipline, but recent research has underscored the importance of cross-disciplinary learning methods in enhancing academic performance and student engagement. Studies indicate that integrating multidisciplinary approaches into zoology education improves conceptual understanding and practical skill development, equipping students with the tools needed to address complex biological challenges (Chhablani, 2024). Integrating chemistry, physics, and bioinformatics into zoological studies has yielded several innovative educational models, such as:
* Bioinformatics in species classification: Advances in DNA sequencing and deep learning have significantly improved the accuracy of phylogenetic mapping, allowing for more precise classification of species based on genetic markers (Mock et al., 2022).

* Biomechanics in ecological studies – Physics-based models and computational simulations have been instrumental in analyzing predator-prey interactions and animal locomotion, providing deeper insights into ecological dynamics (Diz-Pita & Otero-Espinar, 2021).

* Environmental chemistry in marine biology: The study of ocean acidification, pollution impact, and ecosystem health increasingly relies on an interdisciplinary approach combining zoology, chemistry, and climate science to develop effective conservation strategies (Ferraro et al., 2024).

* Recent research underscores the benefits of interdisciplinary learning in zoology education. A systematic review by Rodríguez-Muñoz and Huincahue (2024) highlighted that students exposed to multidisciplinary teaching methods exhibit enhanced analytical reasoning and applied problem-solving skills, outperforming those in traditional curricula. These findings emphasize the need for education systems that replicate real-world scientific collaborations, fostering critical thinking and adaptability in future zoologists.

## 2.3 Challenges in Implementing a Multidisciplinary Curriculum

Despite its numerous advantages, multidisciplinary zoology teaching faces significant implementation challenges. Chuene and Teane (2024) identified curriculum rigidity and resource inadequacy as key barriers, making it difficult for educators to integrate interdisciplinary content with core zoology topics. Additionally, Harvie (2020) highlighted that faculty expertise limitations often hinder effective cross-disciplinary teaching, as many instructors lack formal training in multiple scientific fields. Addressing these obstacles requires curriculum flexibility, professional development, and institutional support to enhance multidisciplinary zoology education.

Technological limitations remain a significant barrier to multidisciplinary zoological education. Advanced bioinformatics tools, ecological

modeling software, and laboratory equipment often require substantial financial investment, which is unavailable in resource-limited institutions (Tafa et al., 2011). Moreover, Xu et al. (2022) found that some students struggle with interdisciplinary content, particularly when they lack foundational knowledge of auxiliary subjects such as physics or mathematics. Addressing these challenges requires increased funding, accessible digital resources, and interdisciplinary preparatory coursework to ensure the effective integration of technology-driven learning.

## 2.4 Solutions and Future Directions in Multidisciplinary Zoology Education

To address these challenges, researchers recommend several strategies:

* Professional development of educators plays a crucial role in enhancing faculty expertise in interdisciplinary zoology education. Regular workshops and interdisciplinary training programs equip instructors with the skills necessary to effectively integrate multiple disciplines into their teaching (Harvie, 2020). Expanding access to continuous professional learning opportunities can help educators overcome knowledge gaps and foster more engaging and comprehensive learning environments for students.

* A flexible curriculum design is essential for integrating interdisciplinary learning into zoology education. By offering elective modules in physics, chemistry, and bioinformatics, institutions can enable students to explore complementary disciplines without overburdening their core coursework (Chhablani, 2024). This approach fosters a customized learning experience by equipping students with the diverse scientific competencies needed for modern research and industrial applications.

* Investment in technology is crucial to enhance interdisciplinary education in zoology. Universities should prioritize funding for laboratory equipment, simulation software, and virtual learning platforms to facilitate hands-on scientific exploration and cross-disciplinary collaboration (Tafa et al., 2011). Such investments ensure that students gain practical experience with advanced research tools and prepare them to meet the evolving demands of modern science.

* Collaborative learning models play a vital role in interdisciplinary education by fostering
cross-departmental collaboration and student-led projects. These initiatives enhance problem-solving skills, promote deeper engagement with multiple scientific disciplines, and prepare students for real-world challenges (Nagle, 2013). By working together across fields, students can develop a more integrated understanding of biology and related sciences.

By implementing these strategies, educators can bridge disciplinary gaps and create a more holistic, dynamic approach to zoology education that reflects the complexity of the biological sciences in the 21st century.

# 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS

## 3.1 Study Design

This study employed a mixed-methods approach that integrates qualitative and quantitative research to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary teaching methodologies in zoology education. The study was conducted in two phases:

1. **Literature Review:** A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles, Scopus-indexed journals, and educational reports was conducted to analyze existing research on interdisciplinary approaches in life sciences.

2. **Empirical Survey Study:** A large-scale survey was administered to students and educators from institutions that have implemented multidisciplinary zoology curricula, assessing their perceptions, learning outcomes, and challenges.

This study provides comparative insights by analyzing survey responses from institutions with traditional zoology education models versus those with interdisciplinary approaches.

## 3.2 Participants and Data Collection

To ensure a robust and comprehensive dataset, the study surveyed 3,500 undergraduate and postgraduate zoology students across multiple universities. The participants were selected using random stratified sampling to ensure representation across different educational institutions.

* Inclusion Criteria:

* Students enrolled in Zoology programs with exposure to interdisciplinary courses.

* Institutions implementing integrated teaching approaches combine zoology with computational, environmental, and bioinformatics sciences.

* Exclusion Criteria:

* Students without exposure to interdisciplinary learning.

* Institutions following strictly traditional Zoology curricula without cross-disciplinary components.

The survey was conducted over a six-month period (July 2024 – December 2024) using an online questionnaire distributed via institutional emails, student forums, and academic networks.

## 3.3 Teaching Approach and Implementation

The study reviewed different models of implementing multidisciplinary education in Zoology, including:

* Integrated Course Modules – courses combining Zoology with Physics (biomechanics), chemistry (Molecular Biology), and Computational Sciences (bioinformatics).

* Project-Based Learning (PBL): Case studies of universities where students engaged in cross-disciplinary research projects in zoology.

* Technology-Enhanced Learning institutions incorporate GIS mapping, bioinformatics tools, and AI-driven ecological modeling into their curricula.

* Collaborative Interdisciplinary Learning – Evaluation of student engagement in joint coursework and research collaborations between life sciences and computational science departments.

Additionally, survey data from educators and students at selected institutions were analyzed to understand the challenges and benefits of these approaches.

## 3.4 Survey Instrument & Evaluation Metrics

A structured survey instrument was designed with both quantitative and qualitative questions to assess:

* Student Learning Outcomes

* Pre- and post-course assessments were analyzed to measure improvements in
problem-solving, critical thinking, and conceptual integration across disciplines.

* Comparative analysis of student performance in traditional and interdisciplinary programs based on GPA, project quality, and concept application tests.

* Faculty & Institutional Feedback

* Qualitative interviews were conducted with faculty members teaching interdisciplinary Zoology courses.

* Institutional reports evaluating curriculum changes and implementation challenges were reviewed.

* Student Perception & Engagement

* Likert-scale questions measuring student engagement, confidence in cross-disciplinary applications, and the perceived relevance of interdisciplinary education.

## 3.5 Data Analysis & Statistical Methods

The collected data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics to evaluate the effectiveness of the interdisciplinary teaching approaches.

* Quantitative Analysis

* Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) were used to summarize survey responses.

* ANOVA Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare student performance before and after exposure to interdisciplinary courses.

* Chi-square tests measured correlations between interdisciplinary exposure and perceived learning benefits.

* Qualitative Analysis

* A thematic analysis was conducted on open-ended survey responses and faculty interviews to identify key themes related to interdisciplinary teaching challenges and successes.

## 3.6 Case Study Comparison

To provide further empirical evidence, this study conducted a comparative analysis of three universities with well-established interdisciplinary zoology programmes. These institutions were selected based on the following criteria.

* Curriculum innovation in integrating multidisciplinary approaches

* Proven success in student engagement and learning outcomes

* Availability of institutional reports on interdisciplinary education

Each case study was evaluated based on:

* Course structure and implementation strategies

* Student performance metrics

* Faculty and student feedback on interdisciplinary curriculum effectiveness

# 4. RESULTS

This section presents the findings of the study and evaluates the impact of a multidisciplinary approach on student performance, engagement levels, and faculty perspectives. The results are supported by statistical analyses and comparisons with the existing literature.

## 4.1 Impact on Student Performance

A paired t-test was conducted to measure student performance before and after implementing the multidisciplinary zoology education approach. Statistical results indicated a significant improvement.

* t-statistic = 69.57

* p-value = $3.48 \times 10^{-19}$ (highly significant)

**Key Findings:** Students exposed to interdisciplinary modules (e.g., biomechanics, bioinformatics, and ecological modeling) demonstrated an average 15% improvement in conceptual application tests (Table 1, Fig. 1) compared to those following traditional zoology curricula.

This statistically significant improvement reflects not only enhanced conceptual understanding but also higher student engagement and motivation. The increase in performance suggests that interdisciplinary teaching methods help students make real-world connections, fostering critical thinking and long-term retention. These outcomes align with educational goals of producing biologically literate graduates capable of addressing complex ecological and technological challenges.

**Interpretation:** These findings confirm that incorporating cross-disciplinary content leads to substantially improved comprehension and problem-solving skills among students.
<table><caption>Table 1. Comparison of student performance across different teaching approaches</caption><thead><tr><td>Teaching Approach</td><td>Pre-Test Score (Avg)</td><td>Post-Test Score (Avg)</td><td>% Improvement</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Traditional Zoology</td><td>72.1</td><td>74.5</td><td>+3.3%</td></tr><tr><td>Biomechanics Integrated</td><td>70.8</td><td>81.6</td><td>+15.2%</td></tr><tr><td>Bioinformatics Applied</td><td>71.5</td><td>82.4</td><td>+15.3%</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 1. Average student scores before and after the integration of multidisciplinary approaches</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>Table 2. Engagement score distribution</caption><thead><tr><td>Teaching Approach</td><td>Engagement Score (Avg)</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Traditional Zoology</td><td>3.4 / 5</td></tr><tr><td>Biomechanics Integrated</td><td>4.6 / 5</td></tr><tr><td>Bioinformatics Applied</td><td>4.8 / 5</td></tr></tbody><tfoot><tr><td colspan="2"><strong>Student-reported engagement scores on a 5-point scale</strong></td></tr></tfoot></table>

Key Insight: Students reported higher engagement levels when they were exposed to interdisciplinary methods, reinforcing the idea that real-world content enhances motivation and participation.

## 4.2 Engagement Levels Across Teaching Methods

Student engagement levels were analyzed across three teaching approaches: (Table 2)

1. Traditional Zoology Education

2. Biomechanics-Integrated Zoology

3. Bioinformatics-Enhanced Zoology

A one-way ANOVA test revealed significant differences in engagement levels:

* F-statistic = 226.89

* p-value = 1.71 × 10⁻¹³ (highly significant)

## 4.3 Faculty Perspectives on Implementation Challenges

To assess faculty perspectives, a chi-square test was conducted on the survey responses.

* Chi-square value = 0.53

* p-value = 0.76 (not significant)

**Interpretation:** Faculty responses were largely consistent, revealing three key challenges:

1. Curriculum Constraints: Difficulty in integrating new disciplines owing to time limitations and rigid course structures.

2. Faculty Expertise Gaps – Lack of training in multiple disciplines (e.g., computational sciences and biomechanics).

3. Resource Limitations – Need for specialized tools, software, and laboratory infrastructure.

**Potential Solutions:**

* Curriculum redesign to incorporate modular interdisciplinary courses.

* Faculty development workshops on bioinformatics, ecological modeling, and biomechanics.
* Investment in digital tools to support computational learning.

* In addition, establishing interdisciplinary teaching fellowships or collaborative teaching models can allow faculty from different departments to co-develop and deliver content, fostering both expertise and confidence in interdisciplinary education. Online platforms such as NPTEL, Coursera, and SWAYAM offer accessible resources for continuous upskilling in emerging fields relevant to zoology. Furthermore, pilot programs with limited interdisciplinary modules can help faculty gradually adapt to this shift while allowing institutions to assess feasibility and outcomes before large-scale implementation.

## 4. DISCUSSION

The results of this study strongly support the growing body of research advocating multidisciplinary approaches to zoology education. Our findings suggest that integrating diverse disciplines, such as biomechanics, bioinformatics, and environmental science, enhances students' learning outcomes, engagement, and real-world problem-solving skills. This discussion compares our results with those of recent studies published in 2024 and earlier literature, highlighting evolving trends in multidisciplinary education. Preliminary classroom experiences and informal observations from earlier teaching sessions hinted at the potential benefits of integrating allied disciplines into core zoology topics. These experiences served as a motivation for conducting a structured study, which now confirms that a multidisciplinary framework significantly enhances student engagement and learning outcomes.

### 4.1 Multidisciplinary Learning Enhances Student Performance

Our study demonstrated that students who engaged in interdisciplinary learning performed significantly better in assessments, which aligns with the recent literature emphasizing the benefits of integrating multiple scientific disciplines.

**Comparative Analysis:**

* Recent Studies (2023-2025):

* Veterinary professionals play a crucial role in multidisciplinary teams, advocating greater collaboration between zoology and medical education. This interdisciplinary integration

enhances comparative medicine, public health strategies, and biomedical research, and ultimately strengthens the connection between human and animal health. A systems-informed approach to veterinary education incorporating positive psychology and interdisciplinary cooperation has been identified as essential for fostering professional well-being and advancing veterinary medicine (Corrigan et al., 2025).

* Erkoc et al. (2024) explored the pharmacological potential of linear pseudoscorpion toxins and indirectly supported the need for pharmacological education in zoology curricula to enhance interdisciplinary research and applications.

* Singh et al. (2023) examined oral myiasis caused by *Chrysomya bezziana* in an immunocompromised patient, emphasizing the importance of integrating zoological knowledge with medical expertise for effective diagnosis and treatment.

* Earlier Studies (2019–2021):

* Davidesco and Tanner (2020) demonstrated that students engaged in interdisciplinary learning, particularly biology and computational modeling, achieved 23% higher assessment scores than those taught through conventional methods.

* Similarly, Pereira et al. (2020) observed a significant improvement in student performance when genetics instruction incorporated bioinformatic tools, underscoring the effectiveness of technology-driven approaches in zoological education.

These findings reinforce the effectiveness of integrating fields such as biomechanics and bioinformatics into zoology education. The shift from memorization-based learning to applied interdisciplinary problem solving is crucial for modernizing zoology curricula (Fig. 2).

This line graph shows a steady rise in research publications in multidisciplinary zoology over the past 20 years, indicating a growing interest and advancements in the field.

### 4.2 Increased Engagement through Interdisciplinary Approaches

Our results indicated that student engagement significantly increased when exposed to real-world zoology applications, particularly when integrating technological and computational tools.
Increase in Research Publications in Multidisciplinary Zoology (2005-2025)

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 2. Increase in Research Publications in Multidisciplinary Zoology (2005-2025)</figcaption></figure>

**Comparative Analysis:**

* Recent Studies (2024 & 2025):

* Dantani and Ige (2024) examined the conservation status and ecological characteristics of tree species in the Kano Zoological Garden and emphasized the role of education in promoting public engagement in wildlife conservation. Their findings highlight the need to incorporate economics, environmental science, and public policy into zoology curricula.

* Guo, He, and Yan (2025) explored the effectiveness of case-based learning in pharmacy education, suggesting that this approach could be adapted for zoology training, particularly for disease management in wildlife.

* Earlier Studies (2018–2022):

* Keogh, Moro, and Knudson (2021) found that incorporating biomechanics into biology courses through game-based activities significantly enhanced student engagement,

leading to a 30% increase in participation in hands-on projects.

* Additionally, Johnston, Slater, and Cazier (2022) examined interdisciplinary approaches in bioinformatics education, demonstrating that students utilizing bioinformatics tools for species classification were more likely to pursue research careers, emphasizing the importance of computational methods in zoology education.

These findings confirm that integrating real-world applications into zoology courses fosters deeper engagement and encourages students to explore their research and conservation efforts (Table 3).

## 4.3 Faculty Perspectives and Implementation Challenges

Despite clear advantages, faculty members in our study acknowledged several barriers to implementing multidisciplinary teaching, including curriculum constraints, expertise gaps, and resource limitations.

<table><caption>Table 3. Interdisciplinary Applications in Zoology</caption><thead><tr><td>Interdisciplinary Field</td><td>Applications</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Biomechanics</td><td>Prosthetic limb development, Robotics inspired by animals</td></tr><tr><td>Bioinformatics</td><td>Genetic sequencing, AI-driven species classification</td></tr><tr><td>Molecular Genetics</td><td>Evolutionary studies, Genetic modification, Disease research</td></tr><tr><td>Ecological Modeling</td><td>Predicting species migration, Conservation strategies</td></tr><tr><td>Veterinary Medicine</td><td>Improved diagnostics, Animal health monitoring</td></tr></tbody></table>
**Comparative Analysis:**

* Curriculum Constraints:

* Cai and Lönnqvist (2021) identified organizational and structural barriers as key challenges in implementing interdisciplinary degree programs, emphasizing that rigid institutional policies hinder curriculum innovation.

* Solution: Implementing modular curriculum designs that allow students to select interdisciplinary electives, foster flexibility in education, and promote cross-disciplinary learning.

* Faculty Expertise Gaps:

* Xu et al. (2022) highlighted that limited faculty expertise in interdisciplinary subjects poses a significant barrier to effective cross-disciplinary education as many educators lack formal training in multiple domains.

* Solution: Implementing faculty development workshops and fostering cross-disciplinary collaboration to enhance teaching confidence and interdisciplinary competency.

* Resource Limitations:

* Gouvea (2023) identified that inadequate access to computational tools and digital resources hinders the integration of bioinformatics and other technology-driven disciplines into undergraduate science education.

* Solution: Investing in open-access digital tools and software to enhance computational learning opportunities in zoology education.

Recent studies have reinforced these challenges and highlighted solutions (Table 4), such as integrating digital learning tools and fostering interdisciplinary faculty collaborations.

**4.4 Implications for Zoology Education and Future Research**

This study underscores the need to modernize zoology education by incorporating multidisciplinary learning approaches (Table 5, Fig. 3). Our findings, combined with recent research, suggest that future curricula should:

* Incorporate adaptive learning models integrating AI-driven ecological modeling.

* Longitudinal studies were conducted to track the impact of interdisciplinary education on career outcomes (Fig. 5).

* Conduct comparative studies across institutions to identify best practices in multidisciplinary science education (Fig. 4).

The bar chart (Fig. 3) compares students' performance based on Engagement, Understanding, Application Skills, and Career Readiness. Multidisciplinary learning shows higher performance across all aspects than traditional methods.

The diagram (Fig. 4) illustrates how zoology integrates with various disciplines, such as Bioinformatics, Biomechanics, Conservation Biology, and Veterinary Science, showing their respective applications.

<table><caption>Table 4. Challenges and Solutions in Implementing Multidisciplinary Teaching</caption><thead><tr><td>Challenge</td><td>Proposed Solution</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Rigid Curriculum</td><td>Introduce modular courses, flexible learning</td></tr><tr><td>Lack of Faculty Expertise</td><td>Faculty training, Interdisciplinary collaboration</td></tr><tr><td>Limited Access to Technology</td><td>Investment in digital tools, Virtual labs</td></tr><tr><td>High Implementation Cost</td><td>Government & private funding, Cost-effective tools</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>Table 5. Comparison with Traditional vs. Multidisciplinary zoology education</caption><thead><tr><td>Aspect</td><td>Traditional Zoology Education</td><td>Recent Multidisciplinary Approach</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Focus</td><td>Classification, anatomy, ecology</td><td>Applied zoology, conservation, veterinary medicine</td></tr><tr><td>Methods</td><td>Fieldwork, lectures, dissection</td><td>Interdisciplinary case studies, real-world problem-solving</td></tr><tr><td>Collaboration</td><td>Limited to biology and ecology</td><td>Integration with medicine, pharmacology, public policy</td></tr><tr><td>Application</td><td>Academic and research-based learning</td><td>Practical applications in conservation, medical sciences</td></tr></tbody></table>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 3. Comparison of student performance in Traditional vs. Multidisciplinary Learning</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 4. Concept Map of Multidisciplinary Zoology</figcaption></figure>
Career Opportunities for Multidisciplinary Zoology Graduates

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 5. Career Opportunities for Multidisciplinary Zoology Graduates</figcaption></figure>

This pie chart illustrates the career distribution of students specializing in multidisciplinary zoology, with many entering the research, biotechnology, AI and bioinformatics, and conservation fields.

**5. CONCLUSION**

This study reaffirms that integrating interdisciplinary approaches into zoology education significantly enhances students' learning outcomes, engagement, and real-world applicability. By incorporating elements from genetics, bioinformatics, biomechanics, environmental science, and technology-driven methodologies, zoology curricula can prepare students to address contemporary challenges in conservation, biomedical research, and ecological sustainability. The shift from traditional, discipline-specific education to a more holistic, integrated approach fosters innovation, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills, which are essential for navigating the evolving landscape of biological sciences.

However, implementing interdisciplinary education in zoology is challenging. Institutional barriers such as rigid curriculum structures, limited faculty expertise, and resource constraints hinder their widespread adoption. To maximize the benefits of this approach, universities must undertake strategic curriculum reforms that allow for greater flexibility in course

design, foster cross-disciplinary faculty collaboration, and invest in modern educational technologies, including AI-powered learning tools and laboratory advancements.

**5.1 Future Implications and Policy Recommendations**

Several key actions should be considered for the effective implementation of interdisciplinary zoology education.

1. Curriculum Revision: Universities should develop modular or interdisciplinary courses that allow students to integrate knowledge from multiple scientific domains. This could include elective tracks in bioinformatics, conservation technologies, and biomechanics.

2. Faculty Training and Collaboration: Institutions should facilitate faculty development programs that equip educators with interdisciplinary teaching strategies. Encouraging cross-departmental collaboration can also bridge the expertise gaps.

3. Technology Integration: Investing in digital learning platforms, AI-based research tools, and virtual labs can enhance interdisciplinary learning, providing students with hands-on experience in computational zoology, data analysis, and ecological modeling.
4. Policy Support and Institutional Commitment: Higher education policies should support flexible degree structures that promote interdisciplinary learning, while maintaining core zoology competencies. Therefore, funding opportunities for research and curriculum innovation should be expanded.

As the field of zoology continues to intersect with emerging scientific disciplines, embracing a multidisciplinary educational approach is no longer optional; it is imperative. Institutions that proactively integrate interdisciplinary methodologies will not only enhance student learning, but also contribute to the development of future scientists capable of addressing complex biological and environmental challenges. By adopting these reforms, zoology education can evolve into a dynamic, future-ready discipline that fosters graduates who are both scientifically competent and adaptable to the ever-changing demands of the field.

## DISCLAIMER (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE)

The author(s) hereby declare that generative AI technologies, such as Large Language Models, have been used during the writing or editing of this manuscript. This explanation includes the name, version, model, and source of the generative AI technology, as well as representative input prompts provided to the AI.

The authors declare the use of ChatGPT (OpenAI) for the sole purpose of improving grammar, enhancing clarity, and simplifying language only. The tool was not used for generating original scientific content, data analysis, or interpretation of results. All AI-assisted content was critically reviewed, edited, and approved by the authors.

## Details of AI Usage:

1. **Name & Version:** ChatGPT (GPT-4)

2. **Source:** OpenAI (https://chat.openai.com)

3. **Usage:** Used only to improve grammar, clarity, and language in author responses to reviewer comments.

4. **Sample Prompts:**

* "Please check this academic abstract for grammar and clarity."

* "Format references according to APA/MLA/Journal guidelines."

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the faculty members of Acharya Nagarjuna University and Zoology Departments across Andhra Pradesh for their

valuable feedback during the development of this interdisciplinary curriculum. We also acknowledge the students who participated in case studies for their engagement and insights.

## COMPETING INTERESTS

Authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

## REFERENCES

Alves, R., Vilaprinyo, E., & Sorribas, A. (2008). Integrating bioinformatics and computational biology: Perspectives and possibilities for in silico network reconstruction in molecular systems biology. *Current Bioinformatics*, 3(2), 98–129.
https://doi.org/10.2174/157489308784340694

Ballard, H. L., Lindell, A. J., & Jadallah, C. C. (2024). Environmental education outcomes of community and citizen science: A systematic review of empirical research. *Environmental Education Research*, 30(6), 1007–1040.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2348702

Cai, Y., & Lönnqvist, A. (2021). Overcoming the barriers to establishing interdisciplinary degree programmes: The perspective of managing organisational innovation. *Higher Education Policy*. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00242-0

Chhablani, K. (2024). Challenges in implementation of multidisciplinary education. *Journal of Advanced Zoology*, 45, 332–337.
https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v45iS4.4209

Chuene, D., & Teane, F. (2024). Resource inadequacy as a barrier to effective curriculum implementation by life sciences teachers in South Africa. *South African Journal of Education*, 44(2), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v44n2a2387

Corrigan, V. K., Newman, R. L., Richmond, P., Strand, E. B., & Vaisman, J. M. (2025). The future of flourishing in veterinary medicine: A systems-informed positive psychology approach in veterinary education. *Frontiers in Veterinary Science*, 11, 1484412.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1484412

Dantani, A., & Ige, P. (2024). Determination of conservation status, growth, and yield
characteristics of tree species in Kano Zoological Garden, Kano State, Nigeria. [World Scientific News, EISSN 2392-2192], 191, 67-80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378634561_Determination_of_Conservation_Status_Growth_and_Yield Characteristic s_ofTree_Species_in_Kano_Zoological_Garden_Kano_State_Nigeria

Davidesco, I., & Tanner, K. D. (2020). Cross-disciplinary research in biology education: Challenges and opportunities. *CBE—Life Sciences Education*, 19(3), ed1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-07-0150

Diz-Pita, É., & Otero-Espinar, M. V. (2021). Predator–prey models: A review of some recent advances. *Mathematics*, 9(15), 1783. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9151783

Erkoc, P., Schiffmann, S., Ulshöfer, T., Henke, M., Marner, M., Krämer, J., Predel, R., Schäberle, T. F., Hurka, S., Dersch, L., Vilcinskas, A., Fürst, R., & Lüddecke, T. (2024). Determining the pharmacological potential and biological role of linear pseudoscorpion toxins via functional profiling. *iScience*, 27(7), 110209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.110209

Ferraro, A., Siciliano, A., Spampinato, M., Morello, R., Trancone, G., Race, M., Guida, M., Fabbricino, M., Spasiano, D., & Fratino, U. (2024). A multi-disciplinary approach based on chemical characterization of foreshore sediments, ecotoxicity assessment, and statistical analyses for environmental monitoring of marine-coastal areas. *Marine Environmental Research*, 202, 106780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.1.06780

Gouvea, J. S. (2023). Integrating computation into science education. *CBE—Life Sciences Education*, 22(3), fe2. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.23-05-0093

Guo, Z., He, Y., & Yan, J. (2025). Undergraduate pharmacy students' preference for case-based learning: A discrete choice experiment in China. *Frontiers in Pharmacology*, 16, 1529492. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1529492

Hanisch, S., & Eirdosh, D. (2020). Educational potential of teaching evolution as an interdisciplinary science. *Evolution: Education and Outreach*, 13, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-020-00138-4

Harvie, J. (2020). Interdisciplinary learning: Addressing the implementation gap. *Scottish Educational Review*, 52(2), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1163/27730840-05202011

Hwang, J., Choo, S., Morano, S., Liang, M., & Kabel, M. (2024). From silos to synergy in STEM education: Promoting interdisciplinary STEM education to enhance the science achievement of students with learning disabilities. *Learning Disabilities Research & Practice*, 39. https://doi.org/10.1177/09388982241245452

Johnston, I. G., Slater, M., & Cazier, J.-B. (2022). Interdisciplinary and transferable concepts in bioinformatics education: Observations and approaches from a UK MSc course. *Frontiers in Education*, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.826951

Keogh, J. W. L., Moro, C., & Knudson, D. (2021). Promoting learning of biomechanical concepts with game-based activities. *Sports Biomechanics*, 23(3), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1845470

Khan, S., Nabi, G., Ullah, M. W., Yousaf, M., Manan, S., Siddique, R., & Hou, H. (2016). Overview on the role of advance genomics in conservation biology of endangered species. *International Journal of Genomics*, 2016, 3460416. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3460416

Mo, X., Ge, W., Miraglia, M., Inglese, F., Zhao, D., Stefanini, C., & Romano, D. (2020). Jumping locomotion strategies: From animals to bioinspired robots. *Applied Sciences*, 10(23), 8607. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238607

Mock, F., Kretschmer, F., Kriese, A., Böcker, S., & Marz, M. (2022). Taxonomic classification of DNA sequences beyond sequence similarity using deep neural networks. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*, 119(35), e2122636119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122636119

Nagle, B. (2013). Preparing high school students for the interdisciplinary nature of modern biology. *CBE—Life Sciences Education*, 12(2), 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-03-0047

Osman, K., Hiong, L., & Vebrianto, R. (2013). 21st Century Biology: An interdisciplinary approach of biology, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. *Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 102, 188-194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.73
2

Pathak, D., & Sheth, M. (2023). *STEM education: An interdisciplinary and integrated approach of teaching*. ISBN: 978-93-5813-132-1.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370229578_STEM EDUCATION_AN_INTE RDISCIPLINARY_AND_INTEGRATED_A PPROACH_OF_TEACHING

Pereira, R., Oliveira, J., & Sousa, M. (2020). Bioinformatics and computational tools for next-generation sequencing analysis in clinical genetics. *Journal of Clinical Medicine*, **9**(1), 132.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010132

Pettorelli, N., Williams, J., Schulte to Bühne, H., & Crowson, M. (2024). Deep learning and satellite remote sensing for biodiversity monitoring and conservation. *Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation*. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.415

Rodríguez-Muñoz, C., & Huincahue, J. (2024). Interdisciplinary practices for teaching biology: A systematic review. *Journal of Biological Education*, **1-19**.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2024.2399516

Saba, N., & Balwan, W. (2025). AI and future of zoology. *Current Concepts in Integrative Journal of Molecular Biology*. https://doi.org/10.36344/ccijmb.2024.v06i06.003

Scherer, R., & Beckmann, J. F. (2014). The acquisition of problem-solving competence: Evidence from 41 countries that math and science education matters. *Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 2*, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-014-0010-7

Singh, T. K., Sankar, H., E. A., Gupta, A., & Kumar, M. (2023). Oral myiasis in an immunocompromised adult undergoing chemotherapy: A rare case and comprehensive treatment protocol. *Cureus*, **15**(7), e42555.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42555

Tafa, Z., Rakocevic, G., Mihailovic, D., & Milutinovic, V. (2011). Effects of interdisciplinary education on technology-driven application design. *IEEE Transactions on Education*, **54**(3), 462-470.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2010.2080359

Van der Geest, N., & Garcia, L. (2023). Employing robotics for the biomechanical validation of a prosthetic flipper for sea turtles as a substitute for animal clinical trials. *Biomechanics*, **3**(3), 401-414.
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics3030033

Xu, C., Wu, C.-F., Xu, D.-D., Lu, W.-Q., & Wang, K.-Y. (2022). Challenges to student interdisciplinary learning effectiveness: An empirical case study. *Journal of Intelligence*, **10**(4), 88.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040088

**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of the publisher and/or the editor(s). This publisher and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© Copyright (2025): Author(s). The licensee is the journal publisher. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Peer-review history:
The peer review history for this paper can be accessed here:
https://prh mbimph com/review-history/4799