# Multifunctionalized Mesostructured Silica Nanoparticles Containing Mn2 Complex for Improved Catalase-Mimicking Activity in Water

Tristan Pelluau, Saad Sene, Beltzane Garcia-Cirera, Belen Albela, Laurent

Bonneviot, Joulia Larionova, Yannick Guari

► To cite this version:

Tristan Pelluau, Saad Sene, Beltzane Garcia-Cirera, Belen Albela, Laurent Bonneviot, et al. "Multi-functionalized Mesostructured Silica Nanoparticles Containing Mn2 Complex for Improved Catalase-Mimicking Activity in Water." Nanomaterials, 2022, 12 (7), pp.1136. 10.3390/nano12071136. hal-03649298

HAL Id: hal-03649298

https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-03649298

Submitted on 30 Aug 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Article

# Multifunctionalized Mesostructured Silica Nanoparticles Containing Mn2 Complex for Improved Catalase-Mimicking Activity in Water

Tristan Pelluau<fnref n="1" />, Saad Sene<fnref n="1" />, Beltzane Garcia-Cirera<fnref n="2" />, Belen Albela<fnref n="3" />,* and Laurent Bonneviot<fnref n="3" />, Joulia Larionova<fnref n="1" />,* and Yannick Guari<fnref n="1" />,†

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Pelluau, T.; Sene, S.; Garcia-Cirera, B.; Albela, B.; Bonneviot, L.; Larionova, J.; Guari, Y. Multifunctionalized Mesostructured Silica Nanoparticles Containing Mn2 Complex for Improved Catalase-Mimicking Activity in Water. *Nanomaterials* **2022**, *12*, 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12071136

Academic Editor: Lyudmila M. Bronstein

Received: 25 February 2022

Accepted: 25 March 2022

Published: 29 March 2022

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

**Abstract:** We report the synthesis of a hybrid nanocatalyst obtained through the immobilization of bio-inspired [{Mn(bpy)(H₂O)}(µ-2-MeC₆H₄COO)₂(µ-O){Mn(bpy)(NO₃)}]NO₃ compound into functionalized, monodispersed, mesoporous silica nanoparticles. The in situ dual functionalization sol-gel strategy adopted here leads to the synthesis of raspberry-shaped silica nanoparticles of ca. 72 nm with a large open porosity with preferential localization of 1,4-pyridine within the pores and sulfobetaine zwitterion on the nanoparticles' periphery. These nano-objects exhibit improved catalase-mimicking activity in water thanks to the encapsulation/immobilization of the catalytic active complex and high colloidal stability in water, as demonstrated through the dismutation reaction of hydrogen peroxide.

**Keywords:** nanoparticle; mesostructured silica; dendritic silica; manganese compounds; catalytic activity; catalase

## 1. Introduction

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) have seen an extensive development for the last several decades due to numerous advantages linked with their tunable size, morphology, important surface area and volume of pores, mesoporosity, functionalizable surface, chemical and thermal stability, and mechanical resistance and biocompatibility within certain concentration ranges [1]. MSN of different morphologies (spherical, helical fibers, tubules, crystals nanoparticles, etc.) and porosities (hexagonal, cubic, lamellar, wormhole-like, etc.) with size ranging from a few tens to several hundred nanometers have been widely designed and investigated for applications in different fields including catalysis, biology, optics, gas capture, or waste remediation [2–9].

Among different challenges related to the design of MSN with controlled size, morphology and optimized properties, the functionalization of their internal and external surfaces has attracted particular attention. Two approaches consisting of: (i) the direct condensation during the MSN synthesis, or (ii) the post-synthetic anchoring of functional groups, have been developed for this purpose. The choice between these two strategies is usually governed by the targeted application, MSN morphology and the preferential area of grafting [10,11]. The external surface functionalization is often used to increase the colloidal stability of MSN, because the latter suffers from a high density of surface silanol groups causing aggregation [12]. Such functionalization is also essential for biomedical applications because an appropriate surface coverage permits enhancing the blood circulation time,

<footnote n="1">1 ICGM, University Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, 34000 Montpellier, France; tristan.pelluau@umontpellier.fr (T.P.); saad.sene@umontpellier.fr (S.S.)</footnote>

<footnote n="2">2 Departament de Química Inorgànica i Orgànica, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; beltzane.garcia@antares.qi.ub.edu</footnote>

<footnote n="3">3 Laboratoire de Chimie, ENS de Lyon, Université de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France; laurent.bonneviot@ens-lyon.fr</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: belen.albela@ens-lyon.fr (B.A.); joulia.larionova@umontpellier.fr (J.L.); yannick.guari@umontpellier.fr (Y.G.); Tel.: +33-472-728-856 (B.A.); +33-778-446-903 (Y.G.)</footnote>
and ensures cells' internalization and targeting to desired cells and tissues [1,13]. Moreover, it can also decrease biological side effects and increase bioavailability and selectivity [14–16]. Numerous works have reported the external surface functionalization with polymers and biopolymers, peptides, enzymes, aptamers, antibodies, as well as with simple molecules bearing free functional groups (such as amines, carboxylates, thiols, etc.) allowing further MSN functionalization [17–19]. On the other hand, the inner MSN surface functionalization is crucial because it permits the anchoring/encapsulation of a wide range of functional molecules and biomolecules, complexes and nanoparticles bringing additional physical and chemical properties [20].

Among various investigated MSN, relatively recently developed dendritic or stellate-like shaped nanoparticles have attracted a particular interest. They present several advantages in comparison with their more conventional MSN counterparts: (i) large tunable porosity with pores size ranging from ca. 10–20 nm, permitting loading of functional species with a size larger than 5 nm (such as complexes, biomolecules, small nanoparticles, or enzymes) relevant for biomedical applications, catalysis and others, (ii) tunable and relatively small particle size (lower than 200 nm), (iii) unique dendritic pore structure, (iv) and a special center-radial pore morphology allowing optimized diffusion/mass transport inside the pores [21,22]. As in the case of more conventional MSN morphologies, stellate-like silica nanoparticles can be functionalized by co-condensation and post grafting approaches depending on the targeted effect. However, the works devoted to a dual functionalization of both internal and external surfaces and investigation of the functionalization impact on the nanoparticles morphology are relatively scarce [23]. Indeed, to our knowledge, there is not yet any report on the change of morphology from stellate to raspberry upon the use of an organosilane co-condensed with the tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) silica precursor.

Among different applications of stellate-like MSN, their employment as a platform in the aim to protect and support catalytically active species and improve their activity has attracted a particular interest. In fact, the open porosity of the dendritic nanoparticles allows the incorporation into the pores of various large species presenting promising catalytic properties, such as enzymes, complexes, and small nanoparticles, while keeping a great diffusion of the active molecules [16,21,24]. For instance, small PdO nanoparticles for the catalysis of methane combustion [25], Pd nanoparticles for the Suzuki coupling reactions [26], and Ru nanoparticles for the hydrogenolysis of alkanes have been incorporated inside the pores [27]. Molecular catalysts were also immobilized, though the number of works on this topic is relatively scarce. We can cite the encapsulation of a tantalum hydride complex for the hydrometathesis reaction of olefins [28], heteropolyacids for the dehydration of n-butanol to di-n-butyl-ether [29] or amine functions for Knoevenagel condensation and transesterification reaction [30]. It is noteworthy that stellate-like MSN incorporating either nanoparticles [27] or molecular immobilized catalysts [29,30] demonstrated enhanced catalytic activity compared to SBA-15 or MCM-41 supports, due to their above-mentioned specific advantages. The advantage of raspberry-like morphologies has yet to be proved.

The bio-inspired [{Mn(bpy)(H₂O)}(µ-2-MeC₆H₄COO)₂(µ-O){Mn(bpy)(NO₃)}]NO₃ complex (denoted in the text afterwards as Mn-cat) presents an interesting catalase-like activity, which could be highly promising for the regulation of oxidative stress [31]. However, as with many bioinspired complexes, its poor solubility in water and its catalytic activity possible only in organic solvents prevents its use for biological applications. In order to overcome this problem, it has previously been encapsulated in bulk functionalized mesoporous silica MCM-41 and used as a catalyst for the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide [32]. However, the employment of bulk silica is highly limited, and MSN have already demonstrated their better accessibility for reactants, a more uniform distribution in the reaction media because of their colloidal nature, and therefore better performance. With the aim of using the full catalytic capacities of Mn-cat in aqueous medium, we develop in this work an optimized synthetic strategy [33] for the dual internal-external surface functionalization of MSN by two distinct organic functions: (i) 1,4-pyridine preferentially anchored on the internal surface used for the immobilization of Mn-cat [23], and (ii) sulfobetaine zwitterion
(SBS) preferentially grafted on the external surface to ensure high colloidal stability of the nano-objects [34]. The Mn-cat complex was then immobilized inside the MSN porosity thanks to the presence of large open pores and the pyridine moieties, in order to obtain new hybrid nano-objects, which can be used as an efficient nanocatalyst. A particular emphasis is given on the investigation of the functionalization on the morphology of the nanoparticles, on the evaluation of their colloidal stability, and their catalytic activity for the dismutation of hydrogen peroxide in water.

## 2. Materials and Methods

The Mn-cat complex was synthesized according to the protocol described by Fernandez et al. in 2007 [31]. TEOS was purchased from abcr (Karlsruhe, Germany); hexadecyltrimethylammonium p-toluenesulfonate (CTATos) was purchase from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany); 2-(4-pyridylethyl)triethoxysilane (1,4-pyr) was purchased from fluorochem (Hadfield, UK); 3-dimethyl(3-trimethoxysilyl)propyl)-ammonio)propane-1-sulfonate (SBS) was purchased from Gelest (Morrisville, NC, USA); Mn(NO₃)₂·4H₂O was purchased from Alfa-Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA); 2,2-bipyridine was purchased from TCI Europe (Zwijndrecht, Belgium); NBu₄Br was purchased from Fluorochem (Hadfield, UK); o-toluic acid, KMnO₄, ammonium nitrate and triethanolamine (TEAH₃) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).

### 2.1. Synthesis of the Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles

The mesoporous silica nanoparticles were synthesized by using a previously reported method with slight modifications [33].

**Pure silica nanoparticles:** 1.91 g of CTATos and 0.39 g of TEAH₃ were dissolved in 100 mL of ultrapure water and heated at 80 °C for one hour under magnetic stirring at 500 rpm. A total of 70 mmol of TEOS was then added into the solution and which was vigorously stirred for 2 h at 80 °C. At the end of the reaction, the solution was cooled down at room temperature and the nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation at 20 krpm for 10 min. The surfactant CTATos was extracted by three washings of 30 min each in an ethanolic solution of ammonium nitrate at 6 gL⁻¹ using an ultrasonic bath. The nanoparticles were then washed three times with water and one time with ethanol and dried overnight at 80 °C in an oven.

**MSN.** Infrared (IR): v(Si–O–Si) = 980–1250 cm⁻¹ (SiO₂), δ(O–H) = 1608 cm⁻¹ (crystallized water); Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA): Estimated proportion of Si from residual mass at 1100 °C: 45.6%; Elemental analysis found (%): C(1.86), H(1.27), N(0.11); Estimated formula (M): (SiO₂)₁(CTA)₀.₀₀₅ (61.4 g mol⁻¹); Nitrogen sorption: S<sub>BET</sub> = 461 m² g⁻¹; d<sub>TEM</sub> = 100.4 nm.

**Hybrid silica nanoparticles with pyridine:** 1.91 g of CTATos and 0.39 g of TEAH₃ were dissolved in 100 mL of ultrapure water and heated at 80 °C for one hour under magnetic stirring at 500 rpm. The corresponding amount of 1,4-pyr (Table 1) and TEOS (70 mmol of Si) were then added into the solution and vigorously stirred for 2 h at 80 °C. At the end of reaction, the solution was cooled down at room temperature and the nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation at 20 krpm for 10 min. The surfactant CTATos was extracted by three washings of 30 min each in an ethanolic solution of ammonium nitrate at 6 gL⁻¹ using an ultrasonic bath. The nanoparticles were then washed three times with water and one time with ethanol and dried overnight at 80 °C in an oven.

**MSN-1a.** IR: v(Si–O–Si) = 980–1250 cm⁻¹ (SiO₂), v(C=C) = 1575 cm⁻¹ (pyridine), v(C=N) = 1610 cm⁻¹ (pyridine), δ(O–H) = 1630 cm⁻¹ (crystallized water); TGA: Estimated proportion of Si from residual mass at 1100 °C: 45.0%; Elemental analysis found (%): C(2.89), H(1.27), N(0.29); Estimated formula (M): (SiO₂)₁(CTA)₀.₀₀₅(1,4-pyr)₀.₀₀₈ (63.2 g mol⁻¹); Nitrogen sorption: S<sub>BET</sub> = 480 m² g⁻¹; d<sub>TEM</sub> = 79.3 nm.
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Proportional molar amounts of the different reactants added to the synthesis.</caption><thead><tr><th>Sample</th><th>TEOS</th><th>1,4-pyr</th><th>SBS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MSN</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-1a</td><td>0.99</td><td>0.01</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-1b</td><td>0.95</td><td>0.05</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-1c</td><td>0.9</td><td>0.1</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-2</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0.04</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-3a</td><td>0.99</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.04</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-3b</td><td>0.95</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.04</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-3c</td><td>0.9</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.04</td></tr></tbody></table>

**MSN-1b.** IR: $v(\text{Si}-\text{O}-\text{Si}) = 980-1250 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (SiO$_2$), $v(\text{C}=\text{C}) = 1575 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (pyridine), $v(\text{C}=\text{N}) = 1610 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (pyridine), $\delta(\text{O}-\text{H}) = 1630 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (crystallized water); TGA: Estimated proportion of Si from residual mass at 1100 °C: 42.4%; Elemental analysis found (%): C(7.35), H(2.01), N(1.06); Estimated formula (M): $(\text{SiO}_2)_1(\text{CTA})_{0.006}(1,4-\text{pyr})_{0.047}$ (72.2 g mol$^{-1}$); Nitrogen sorption: $S_{\text{BET}} = 442 \text{ m}^2 \text{ g}^{-1}$; $d_{\text{TEM}} = 63.8 \text{ nm}$; $\delta^{13}\text{C}$ (ss-NMR): 12.3 ppm (3C), 123.7 ppm (1C), 148.2 ppm (1C), 154.7 ppm (1C); Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (ss-NMR): $\delta^{29}\text{Si}$ (ss-NMR): -58 ppm (T$_2$), -69 ppm (T$_3$), -91 ppm (Q$_1$), -102 ppm (Q$_2$), -110 ppm (Q$_3$).

**MSN-1c.** IR: $v(\text{Si}-\text{O}-\text{Si}) = 980-1250 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (SiO$_2$), $v(\text{C}=\text{C}) = 1575 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (pyridine), $v(\text{C}=\text{N}) = 1610 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (pyridine), $\delta(\text{O}-\text{H}) = 1630 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (crystallized water); TGA: Estimated proportion of Si from residual mass at 1100 °C: 40.0%; Elemental analysis found (%): C(12.01), H(2.88), N(1.78); Estimated formula (M): $(\text{SiO}_2)_1(\text{CTA})_{0.007}(1,4-\text{pyr})_{0.09}$ (82.1 g mol$^{-1}$); Nitrogen sorption: $S_{\text{BET}} = 592 \text{ m}^2 \text{ g}^{-1}$; $d_{\text{TEM}} = 63.7 \text{ nm}$.

**Silica nanoparticles functionalized with a zwitterion on the surface:** 1.91 CTATos and 0.39 g of TEAH$_3$ were dissolved in 100 mL of ultrapure water and heated at 80 °C for one hour under magnetic stirring at 500 rpm. A total of 70 mmol of TEOS was then added into the solution, which was vigorously stirred for 2 h at 80 °C. For functionalization with SBS, 1 g was added after 2 h and stirred at 80 °C overnight. At the end of reaction, the solution was cooled down at room temperature and the nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation at 20 krpm for 10 min. The surfactant CTATos was extracted by three washings of 30 min each in an ethanolic solution of ammonium nitrate at $6 \text{ gL}^{-1}$ using an ultrasonic bath. The nanoparticles were then washed three times with water and one time with ethanol and dried overnight at 80 °C in an oven.

**MSN-2.** IR: $v(\text{Si}-\text{O}-\text{Si}) = 980-1250 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (SiO$_2$), $v(\text{C}-\text{N}) = 1485 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (SBS), $\delta(\text{O}-\text{H}) = 1608 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (crystallized water); TGA: Estimated proportion of Si from residual mass at 1100 °C: 41.7%; Elemental analysis found (%): C(7.41), H(2.09), N(0.92), S(2.19); Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS): Si/S = 97.2/2.8; Estimated formula (M): $(\text{SiO}_2)_1(\text{CTA})_{0.005}(\text{SBS})_{0.03}$ (70.8 g mol$^{-1}$); Nitrogen sorption: $S_{\text{BET}} = 345 \text{ m}^2 \text{ g}^{-1}$; $d_{\text{TEM}} = 102.9 \text{ nm}$; $\delta^{13}\text{C}$ (ss-NMR): 17.6 ppm (3C), 49.0 ppm (1C), 59.0 ppm (3C); $\delta^{29}\text{Si}$ (ss-NMR): -69 ppm (T$_3$), -91 ppm (Q$_1$), -102 ppm (Q$_2$), -110 ppm (Q$_3$).

**Hybrid nanoparticles presenting pyridine and zwitterionic functions:** 1.91 g of CTATos and 0.39 g of TEAH$_3$ were dissolved in 100 mL of ultrapure water and heated at 80 °C for one hour under magnetic stirring at 500 rpm. The corresponding amount of 1,4-pyr (Table 1) and TEOS (70 mmol of Si) were then added into the solution and vigorously stirred for 2 h at 80 °C. For functionalization with SBS, 1 g SBS was added after 2 h and stirred at 80 °C overnight. At the end of reaction, the solution was cooled down at room temperature and the nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation at 20 krpm for 10 min. The surfactant CTATos was extracted by three washings of 30 min each in an ethanolic solution of ammonium nitrate at $6 \text{ gL}^{-1}$ using an ultrasonic bath. The nanoparticles were then washed three times with water and one time with ethanol and dried overnight at 80 °C in an oven.

**MSN-3a.** IR: $v(\text{Si}-\text{O}-\text{Si}) = 980-1250 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (SiO$_2$), $v(\text{C}-\text{N}) = 1485 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (SBS), $v(\text{C}=\text{C}) = 1575 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (pyridine), $v(\text{C}=\text{N}) = 1610 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (pyridine), $\delta(\text{O}-\text{H}) = 1630 \text{ cm}^{-1}$ (crystallized water); TGA: Estimated proportion of Si from residual mass at 1100 °C: 40.0%; Elemental analysis found (%): C(7.35), H(2.01), N(1.06); Estimated formula (M): $(\text{SiO}_2)_1(\text{CTA})_{0.006}(1,4-\text{pyr})_{0.047}$ (72.2 g mol$^{-1}$); Nitrogen sorption: $S_{\text{BET}} = 442 \text{ m}^2 \text{ g}^{-1}$; $d_{\text{TEM}} = 63.8 \text{ nm}$; $\delta^{13}\text{C}$ (ss-NMR): 12.3 ppm (3C), 123.7 ppm (1C), 148.2 ppm (1C), 154.7 ppm (1C); Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (ss-NMR): $\delta^{29}\text{Si}$ (ss-NMR): -58 ppm (T$_2$), -69 ppm (T$_3$), -91 ppm (Q$_1$), -102 ppm (Q$_2$), -110 ppm (Q$_3$).
water); TGA: Estimated proportion of Si from residual mass at 1100 °C: 40.8%; Elemental analysis found (%): C(7.86), H(2.36), N(1.08), S(1.37); EDS: Si/S = 97.2/2.8; Estimated formula (M): (SiO₂)₁(CTA)₀.₀₀₅(1,4-pyr)₀.₀₁₇(SBS)₀.₀₃ (74.5 g mol⁻¹); Nitrogen sorption: S<sub>BET</sub> = 360 m² g⁻¹; d<sub>TEM</sub> = 81.3 nm.

**MSN-3b.** IR: ν(Si−O−Si) = 980−1250 cm⁻¹ (SiO₂), ν(C−N) = 1485 cm⁻¹ (SBS), ν(C=C) = 1575 cm⁻¹ (pyridine), ν(C=N) = 1610 cm⁻¹ (pyridine), δ(O−H) = 1630 cm⁻¹ (crystallized water); TGA: Estimated proportion of Si from residual mass at 1100 °C: 40.1%; Elemental analysis found (%): C(9.41), H(2.13), N(1.46), S(1.21); EDS: Si/S = 97.4/2.6; Estimated formula (M): (SiO₂)₁(CTA)₀.₀₀₁(1,4-pyr)₀.₀₄₈(SBS)₀.₀₂₈ (79.7 g mol⁻¹); Nitrogen sorption: S<sub>BET</sub> = 423 m² g⁻¹; d<sub>TEM</sub> = 66.8 nm.

**MSN-3c.** IR: ν(Si−O−Si) = 980−1250 cm⁻¹ (SiO₂), ν(C−N) = 1485 cm⁻¹ (SBS), ν(C=C) = 1575 cm⁻¹ (pyridine), ν(C=N) = 1610 cm⁻¹ (pyridine), δ(O−H) = 1630 cm⁻¹ (crystallized water); TGA: Estimated proportion of Si from residual mass at 1100 °C: 38.0%; EDS: Si/S = 97.5/2.5; Elemental analysis found (%): C(13.09), H(3.00), N(2.09), S(1.05); Estimated formula (M): (SiO₂)₁(CTA)₀.₀₀₂(1,4-pyr)₀.₀⁹⁶(SBS)₀.₀²⁷ (74.5 g mol⁻¹); Nitrogen sorption: S<sub>BET</sub> = 400 m² g⁻¹; d<sub>TEM</sub> = 72.7 nm; δ¹³C (ss-NMR): 12.3 ppm (3C), 17.6 ppm (3C), 49.0 ppm (1C), 59.0 ppm (3C), 123.7 ppm (1C), 148.2 ppm (1C), 154.7 ppm (1C).

## 2.2. Encapsulation of the Dinuclear Manganese Complex

**MSN-4a** and **MSN-4b**: 3 mg and 15 mg of Mn-cat for **MSN-4a** and **MSN-4b**, respectively, and 30 mg of **MSN-3c** were suspended in 25 mL of water and stirred overnight at 80 °C. A brown solid was then collected by centrifugation at 20 krpm for 10 min and the supernatant was colorless. The brown powder collected was then washed three times in CH₃CN to remove extra Mn-cat and finally dried overnight in an oven at 80 °C.

**MSN-4a.** EDS: Si/Mn = 98.4/1.6; Estimated formula (M): (SiO₂)₁(CTA)₀.₀₀₁(1,4-pyr)₀.₀⁹⁶(SBS)₀.₀²⁷(Mn-cat)₀.₀⁹⁶ (98.4 g mol⁻¹); Nitrogen sorption: S<sub>BET</sub> = 235 m² g⁻¹; d<sub>TEM</sub> = 72.5 nm.

**MSN-4b.** EDS: Si/Mn = 92.2/7.8; Estimated formula (M): (SiO₂)₁(CTA)₀.₀₀₁(1,4-pyr)₀.₀⁹⁶(SBS)₀.₀²⁷(Mn-cat)₀.₀⁵³ (136.1 g mol⁻¹); Nitrogen sorption: S<sub>BET</sub> = 167 m² g⁻¹; d<sub>TEM</sub> = 71.1 nm.

## 2.3. Nanoparticle's Characterization

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images were performed at 100 kV (JEOL 1200 EXII, Tokyo, Japan). Samples for TEM measurements were deposited from suspensions on copper grids and allowed to dry before observation. The size distribution histograms were determined using enlarged TEM micrographs taken at magnification of 100 K on a statistical sample of ca. 100 NPs. Scanning electron microscopy and EDS were performed on a FEI Quanta FEG 200 instrument (Hillsboro, OR, USA). The powders were deposited on an adhesive carbon film and analyzed under high vacuum. The quantification of the heavy elements was carried out with the INCA software, with a dwell time of 3 µs. High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and STEM-EDS measurements were performed on a JEOL 2200 FS instrument (Tokyo, Japan). Zeta potential and hydrodynamic diameter measurements were recorded on Malvern nanoseries (Malvern, UK), Zetasizer NanoZS (Model ZEN3600) in a DTS1060C Zetacell (for the zeta potential) in water at 25 °C with an equilibration time of 120 s with automatic measurement and data were treated by Zetasizer software using a Smoluchowski model. TGA was performed using a Netsch STA 409 PC analyzer in the temperature range 20−1100 °C at a heating speed of 5 °C min⁻¹ under air. The nanoparticles' composition was determined by elemental analysis (C, H, N, S) and the amount of Si was calculated based on the TGA results by considering the resulting mass at 1100 °C as pure SiO₂. Elemental analyses were performed with an Elementar Vario Micro Cube analyzer (Billerica, MA, USA). Powders were pyrolyzed at 1150 °C and then reduced at 850 °C over hot copper. Gases were separated by gas chromatography. Infrared spectra were recorded by attenuated total reflectance on a Perkin Elmer Spectrum (Waltham, MA, USA). Two spectrophotometer with four acquisitions at a resolution of 4 cm⁻¹. Nitrogen
adsorption and desorption isotherms at 77 K were measured using a TriStar 3000 (Norcross, GA, USA) (V6.06 A). Prior to the sorption experiment, the samples were dried under vacuum at 80 °C for 12 h. The specific surface area ($S_{BET}$) was calculated according to the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. Pore size distribution was obtained from the desorption branch of the nitrogen isotherm using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) equation. All solid-state NMR experiments were performed on a Varian VNMRS 300 MHz (7.05 T) NMR spectrometer (Santa Clara, CA, USA). A 3.2 mm Varian T3 HXY magic angle spinning (MAS) probe was used for ¹³C and ²⁹Si experiments, at operating frequencies of 599.82 and 564.33 MHz, respectively. ¹H–¹³C CPMAS NMR spectra were recorded spinning at 5 kHz, with a contact time of 2.5 ms and 300 kHz, ¹H decoupling during acquisition. A total of 15,000 scans were recorded for each measurement. ¹³C chemical shifts were referenced externally to adamantane (used as a secondary reference), the high frequency peak being set to 38.5 ppm.

## 2.4. *Resistance to Protein-Induced Aggregation and Colloidal Stability*

The nanoparticles' resistance against protein adsorption and its colloidal stability were analyzed by following the hydrodynamic diameter of the nanoparticles by DLS. Nanoparticles were suspended at 1 mg mL⁻¹ in 10 mL of water or of a mix of fetal bovine serum (FBS) and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) high glucose. The hydrodynamic diameter of a 2 mL solution in a cell was followed over a few days for **MSN-3c**.

## 2.5. *Catalytic Tests*

For each test, the number of nanoparticles was chosen and calculated to keep the same amount of Mn-cat (3.9 µmol) in the solution. In a closed flask of 25 mL containing a suspension of nanoparticles in CH₃CN or water, 0.2 mL of hydrogen peroxide 30% (H₂O₂ without inhibitors) were added and the volume of O₂ produced by the dismutation of H₂O₂ was tracked over time. The reaction advancement was calculated based on a theoretical volume of 24 mL considering the dioxygen as a perfect gas in standard conditions (1 atm., 25 °C). For comparison, the same experiments were done using the same amount of Mn-cat dissolved in CH₃CN and water. To address the catalyst resistance/recyclability, the measurements were restarted in situ with the same materials several times.

# 3. Results and Discussion

## 3.1. *Synthesis and Characterisations*

The design of hybrid nanocatalysts was performed through encapsulation of the bio-inspired [{Mn(bpy)(H₂O)}(µ-2-MeC₆H₄COO)₂(µ-O){Mn(bpy)(NO₃)}]NO₃ complex inside the porosity of dually functionalized mesostructured silica by using the two step procedure depicted in Scheme 1. In the first step, the functionalized MSN nanoparticles (**MSN-3a-c**) containing 1,4-pyridine moieties anchored inside the pores and sulfobetaine zwitterion on the nanoparticles surface were synthesized by a sol–gel process using CTATos as surfactant and TEAH₃ as basic catalyst. The functionalization of the MSNs was performed in situ, first by the co-condensation procedure during the sol–gel reaction by adding 1,4-pyridine siloxane and TEOS for its preferential grafting within the nanoparticles, and second by post-functionalization with SBS to promote its preferential grafting at the nanoparticles’ periphery as the pores were obstructed by the surfactant. The latter was then removed by further thorough washings to liberate the porosity and to allow accessibility to the 1,4-pyridine, even though it should be noted that some traces of residual CTA could always be observed. In order to evaluate the impact of 1,4-pyridine moiety on the morphology of nanoparticles, different amounts were anchored inside the porosity leading to the nanoparticles **MSN-3a**, **MSN-3b** and **MSN-3c** (see Table 1 for the initial number of reagents and Table 2 for characteristics).
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 1.** Scheme of the strategy for inner and outer sequential in situ functionalization of MSN nanoparticles with 1,4-pyridine and zwitterion followed by Mn-cat complex encapsulation.</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Chemical and morphologic characteristics of the nanoparticles.</caption><thead><tr><th>Sample</th><th>Composition<sup>b</sup></th><th>M (g mol<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>S<sub>BET</sub> (m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>Pore Size (nm)</th><th>d<sub>TEM</sub> (nm)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MSN<sup>a</sup></td><td>(SiO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CTA)<sub>0.005</sub></td><td>62.7</td><td>547</td><td>19.4</td><td>100.4 ± 10.8</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-1a</td><td>(SiO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CTA)<sub>0.005</sub>(1,4-pyr)<sub>0.008</sub></td><td>63.2</td><td>480</td><td>12.6</td><td>79.3 ± 8.4</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-1b</td><td>(SiO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CTA)<sub>0.006</sub>(1,4-pyr)<sub>0.047</sub></td><td>72.2</td><td>442</td><td>7.7</td><td>63.8 ± 5.7</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-1c</td><td>(SiO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CTA)<sub>0.007</sub>(1,4-pyr)<sub>0.090</sub></td><td>82.1</td><td>407</td><td>-</td><td>63.7 ± 6.3</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-2<sup>a</sup></td><td>(SiO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CTA)<sub>0.005</sub> (SBS)<sub>0.030</sub></td><td>70.8</td><td>480</td><td>17.1</td><td>102.9 ± 13.2</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-3a</td><td>(SiO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CTA)<sub>0.005</sub>(1,4-pyr)<sub>0.017</sub>(SBS)<sub>0.030</sub></td><td>74.5</td><td>360</td><td>14.5</td><td>81.3 ± 1.8</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-3b</td><td>(SiO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CTA)<sub>0.001</sub>(1,4-pyr)<sub>0.048</sub>(SBS)<sub>0.028</sub></td><td>79.7</td><td>423</td><td>7.6</td><td>66.8 ± 5.7</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-3c</td><td>(SiO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CTA)<sub>0.002</sub>(1,4-pyr)<sub>0.096</sub>(SBS)<sub>0.027</sub></td><td>90.1</td><td>400</td><td>-</td><td>72.7 ± 6.3</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-4a</td><td>(SiO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CTA)<sub>0.001</sub>(1,4-pyr)<sub>0.096</sub>(SBS)<sub>0.027</sub>(Mn-cat)<sub>0.0096</sub></td><td>98.4</td><td>235</td><td>-</td><td>72.5 ± 5.8</td></tr><tr><td>MSN-4b</td><td>(SiO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CTA)<sub>0.001</sub>(1,4-pyr)<sub>0.096</sub>(SBS)<sub>0.027</sub>(Mn-cat)<sub>0.048</sub></td><td>136.1</td><td>166</td><td>-</td><td>71.1 ± 5.4</td></tr></tbody></table>

Secondly, the bioinspired [{Mn(bpy)(H<sub>2</sub>O)}(μ-2-MeC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>COO)<sub>2</sub>(μ-O){Mn(bpy)(NO<sub>3</sub>)}]NO<sub>3</sub> (Mn-cat) compound was then incorporated into the silica pores of the nanoparticles **MSN-3c** containing the largest amount of the grafted 1,4-pyridine by its impregnation in water. The manganese complex is poorly soluble in water, but the internal structure of the hybrid silica presents a hydrophobic environment thanks to the pyridine functionalization, which is favorable for the complex incorporation into the nanoparticles. During this reaction, a notable change of color of the silica powder from white to brownish concomitantly with a complete discoloration of the supernatant solution was consistent with a quantitative incorporation of the Mn-cat complexes inside the nanoparticle porosity. The relation between the catalytic activity and the amount of inserted Mn-cat was investigated comparing samples **MSN-4a,b** containing different Mn-cat loadings (composition from EDS, elemental analysis

<footnote><sup>a</sup> Stellate morphology (all other samples have an intermediate stellate-raspberry morphology). <sup>b</sup> Calculated from the elemental analysis.</footnote>
and TGA, see experimental, Figure S1 and Table S1, ESI, Table 2). Relative to the initial con-
centration, the Mn-cat retention yields were 92.7% and 98.1%, corresponding to 0.0096 and
0.053 Mn-cat per SiO2 unit in **MSN-4a** and **MSN-4b**, respectively. Relative to the pyridine
moieties eventually available to coordinate Mn-cat, it corresponds to Mn-cat/pyridine ratio
of 0.10 and 0.55 for **MSN-4a** and **MSN-4b**, respectively.

In order to investigate the impact of the inner and external surface functionalization
with 1,4-pyridine and zwitterion, non-functionalized MSN (MSN) and mono-functionalized
MSN, either with 1,4-pyridine alone with different amounts (MSN-1a-c) or SBS alone,
(MSN-2) were also prepared and characterized for comparison.

As described by Zhang et al. [33], the synthesis of pristine non-functionalized stellate-
like silica MSN leads to the formation of nanoparticles presenting a size of ca. 100 nm with
an open morphology (Figure 1A). However, the functionalization of their inner surface
with pyridine siloxane by using the in situ approach (sample MSN-1c) led to two notable
modifications (Figure 1B): (i) a slight change of the nanoparticles’ shape from stellate to an
intermediate stellate-raspberry-like one, (ii) and a size decrease from 100.4 nm to 63.7 nm
(Table 2). On the other hand, the addition of the SBS at the end of the nanoparticles’ growth
with or without the pyridine moieties (samples MSN-3a-c or MSN-2, respectively) has a
minor impact on their size (100.4 nm vs. 102.9 nm without pyridine or 63.7 nm vs. 72.7 nm
with pyridine, see Table 1) or their morphology (Figure 1C and Figure S2, ESI). Such effects
are induced by the addition of the pyridine siloxane into the MSN and the absence of any
major influence of the zwitterion siloxane is consistent with a preferential location of each
organic function in the core or at the external corona of the nanoparticles, respectively.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** TEM images of: (A) MSN, (B) MSN-1c, (C) MSN-3c and (D) MSN-4a.</figcaption></figure>

Finally, the post-synthetic incorporation of Mn-cat into the silica porosity (sample **MSN-4a** and **MSN-4b**) did not bring any changes in the morphology of the nanoparticles (Figure 1D, Figure 2 and Figure S3, ESI). The nanoparticles keep both their size (Table 1) and their stellate-raspberry-like shape independently on the amount of incorporated Mn-cat.

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** HRTEM images of **MSN-4a** with different magnifications.</figcaption></figure>

Nitrogen sorption measurements were performed on the different nanomaterials
obtained (Figure 2 and Figures S4–S8, ESI) to assess the impact of each step of function-
alization on both surface area and pore size. As observed by TEM, non-functionalized **MSN** and only SBS-functionalized **MSN-2** possess a typical stellate-like morphology with an open porosity presenting pore sizes of 19 nm and 17 nm and high specific surfaces of 547 m² g⁻¹ and 480 m² g⁻¹, respectively. The slightly lowest accessible surface in the latter may be attributed to the presence of the sulfobetaine zwitterion at the periphery, which may partly obstruct the pore entry. Comparatively, introducing 1,4-pyridine siloxane during the sol–gel reaction (**MSN-1c**) leads to an obvious change of morphology from stellate-like to intermediate stellate-raspberry-like, together with a slightly more pronounced decrease in surface area. At low level of addition (0.008 1,4pyr/TEOS) the surface area falls down to 480 m² g⁻¹ and even lower to 442 and 407 m² g⁻¹ at a higher level of addition (0.047, 0.090 1,4pyr/TEOS). Comparing **MSN-1** series to **MSN-3** series of nanoparticles suggests that the effect is additive moving from mono to dual functionalization (Figure 3, Figures S4 and S5). Morphology changes and loss of surface area are consistent with the specific location of the 1,4-pyridine function in the core of the nanoparticles and the sulfobetaine zwitterion at their more open periphery. Even if the pores are less open than in pristine stellate nanoparticles [33], the pore size distribution of the present dual-functionalized nanoparticles remains large and centered at a larger value than a single micelle would template (ca. 7 nm instead of 3 nm) (Figures S4–S7, ESI) [33,35,36]. Indeed, a close look to the external contour of the nanoparticle reveals a marked roughness of 10 to 15 nm, close to that of stellate nanoparticles, although in absence of any radial aspect expected for this morphology, placing these nanoparticles in an intermediate state between stellate and raspberry.

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** N₂ adsorption isotherms of various silica nanoparticles: **MSN** (black), **MSN-3c** (red), **MSN-4a** (blue) and **MSN-4b** (green).</figcaption></figure>

The encapsulation of the Mn-cat complex leads to further decrease in the specific surface area to 235 m² g⁻¹ for **MSN-4a** and 166 m² g⁻¹ for **MSN-4b** (Figures 3 and S8, Table 2). Such results are coherent with an increased clogging of the pores consequent to the incorporation of the complex within the porosity where pyridine moieties are available. Moreover, **MSN-4b** presenting higher amount of the incorporated complex exhibits a much lower specific surface area.

IR spectroscopy allowed us to confirm the grafting of the 1,4-pyridine and sulfobetaine zwitterion moieties into the silica nanoparticles (Figure S9, ESI). In addition to the C–H vibrational band between 2900–3000 cm⁻¹ we can identify various bands from the pyridine function (υ(C=N) = 1610 cm⁻¹, υ(C=C): 1575 cm⁻¹, δ(Si–O–C): 1420 cm⁻¹) and the zwitterion function (υ(C–NH₃): 1485 cm⁻¹, δ(Si–O–C): 1420 cm⁻¹) (Figure S9B, ESI) [37]. Furthermore, a new band at 1440 cm⁻¹ specific to the bipyridine function arising from the Mn-cat complex can be identified on the IR spectrum of **MSN-4b** confirming therefore the incorporation of the latter (Figures S10 and S11, ESI) [32]. On the other hand, the
disappearance of the strong stretching vibration of the NO₃⁻ group on the IR spectrum of **MSN-4b**, which is clearly visible at 1375 cm⁻¹ of the spectrum of the initial complex Mn-cat (Figures S10 and S11, ESI), suggests the probable coordination of Mn-cat to the pyridine functions of silica during immobilization and the loss of the labile NO₃⁻ [31].

The grafting of the pyridine siloxane (**MSN-1b**) and SBS zwitterion siloxane (**MSN-2**) were also confirmed by using ²⁹Si solid-state NMR, which shows the presence of the T₂ and T₃ signals at -59 ppm and -69 ppm, respectively (Figure S12, ESI). The same samples were characterized by ¹³C solid state NMR. In both samples, we observe the peaks at 23, 30, 33 and 54 ppm due to residual CTA. For **MSN-1b**, we can also clearly identify the unshielded ¹³C signals of the pyridine aromatic carbons at 124, 148 and 155 ppm and the methylene alkane chain carbons as a broad peak around 10 ppm (Figure S13A, Table S2, ESI). On the ¹³C NMR spectrum of **MSN-2** we can identify the carbon signals in α position of the nitrogen of the ammonium as a broad peak at 61 ppm, the carbon signal in α position of the sulfonate group at 49 ppm and the other methylene carbons of the alkane chain as a broad peak at 12 ppm. The grafting of both 1,4-pyridine and zwitterion in sample **MSN-3c** was also confirmed by ¹³C NMR. The peak characteristic for each function is clearly visible in the spectrum (Figure S13B, ESI). The NMR characterizations of **MSN-4a** and **MSN-4b** have not been done due to the paramagnetic behavior of the Mn-cat complex at room temperature.

Further, the obtained nanocatalysts have been characterized by STEM/EDS analysis, which allows visualizing the homogeneity of atomic distribution of sulfur from the sulfobetaine zwitterion moieties and manganese atoms from the Mn-cat complex. Figure 4 demonstrates the homogeneous distribution of sulfur and the presence of manganese atoms confirming the encapsulation of the Mn-cat complex for **MSN-4b**.

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** STEM-EDS images of **MSN-4b** with topochemical distribution of Si (pink), O (cyan), N (orange), S (green) and Mn (Red).</figcaption></figure>

The zeta potential and the colloidal stability were investigated for the non-functionalized, mono- and dual-functionalized nanoparticles (Figure S14, ESI) [34]. Indeed, the functions affect the zeta potential that obviously shift to a higher pH. The effect is well pronounced in the presence of 1,4-pyr functions with the zero-point charge moving from a pH of ca. 2.5 to 3.9 for **MSN-1a** and 5.1 for **MSN-1c**, and rather modest for the zwitterionic SBS function, ca. 3.2 for **MSN-2** (Figure S14, ESI). Apparently, the effect of each function is additive as in the dual-functionalized nanoparticles **MSN-3c**, the zero-point charge moves to a slightly higher pH, ca. 5.5. In comparison to non-porous silica nanoparticles grafted with a zwitterion, the zeta potential remains zero. This difference can be explained, in part, by the lower amount of grafted zwitterion in our work (0.69 µmol m⁻² instead of 1.7 µmol m⁻² in
ref. [34]). The open porosity is likely the second reason as it allows the exposition of some 1,4-pyr functions and certainly also some silanol groups to the environment, preventing the achievement of a zero zeta potential.

A major effect of the zwitterion anchoring on the nanoparticles surface was observed in the colloidal stability. Indeed, after drying the nanoparticles, the non-functionalized **MSN** or the 1,4-pyr functionalized **MSN-1a–c** cannot be dispersed in water at 1 mgmL⁻¹ even with an ultrasound treatment, while nanoparticles **MSN-3c** with 10% pyridine and zwitterion were easily dispersed in water and in a biological medium (DMEM high glucose and FBS 50/50) and showed colloidal stability over a few days (Figure 5). Thus, the little amount of zwitterion grafted on the external surface (2.6%, Table 2) was enough to create a water barrier against adsorption and aggregation, even though silanol groups from the porosity may also be exposed to the environment of the MSN [38]. Similar colloidal stability is observed for hybrid nanoparticles **MSN4a** and **MSN4b** containing the inserted Mn-cat complex.

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Colloidal stability study of **MSN-3c** in water (■) and in a biological media DMEM High glucose and FBS 50/50 (●) at 1 mg mL⁻¹.</figcaption></figure>

## 3.2. $H_2O_2$ Catalytic Dismutation Reaction

The catalase activity was determined by measuring the advancement of the dismutation reaction of hydrogen peroxide ($2H_2O_2 \rightarrow 2H_2O + O_2$) in the presence of a suspension of **MSN-4a** or **MSN-4b** nanoparticles and compared with the activity of free-Mn-cat complex in water or in $CH_3CN$. To allow direct comparison of the respective catalytic activities, the same amount of free- and inserted Mn-cat complex in the nanoparticles was used for the catalytic tests to keep a comparable amount of the active species. The results are shown in Figure 6 and the catalytic activity data are summarized in Table S3, ESI. In acetonitrile, the hydrogen peroxide conversion after 1 and 5 min is of 44% and 89% for **MSN-4a**, 27% and 77% for **MSN-4b** and 33% and 73% for free-Mn-cat, respectively. Notably, **MSN4a** contains 5.5 times less immobilized Mn-cat complex than **MSN-4b** and shows a greater catalytic activity, while being normalized relative to the active catalytic centers. That may be attributed to the increased pore clogging in the latter, as shown from $N_2$-sorption experiments and thus to the lower accessibility of reactive $H_2O_2$ to the catalytic centers. After 20 min, 100% conversion is obtained for **MSN4a**, **b** and 95% for free-Mn-cat. In water, a large difference between the free-Mn-cat and the inserted one into the silica pores in **MSN-4a**, **b** is obtained. Indeed, while nanoparticles show excellent catalytic activity with hydrogen peroxide with the 63% and 100% of conversion for **MSN-4a** and 58% and 100% for **MSN-4b** after 1 and 5 min, respectively, the free-Mn-cat compound shows almost no activity with 0.3% and 1% of conversion after 1 and 5 min. The extremely low activity of the latter is explained by its poor solubility in water. Such a difference emphasizes the interest in Mn-cat encapsulation in MSN to preserve its catalytic activity for further biological experiments [32].
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Percentage of H₂O₂ decomposed (% of conv.) over time for: (A) **MSN-4a** (■) and **MSN-4b** (□) in CH₃CN and **MSN-4a** (●) and **MSN-4b** (○) in H₂O; (B) free-Mn-cat in CH₃CN (■) and in H₂O (●).</figcaption></figure>

The comparison of the results obtained in our system with the ones of the Mn-cat complex immobilized into a bulk mesoporous LUS-type silica normalized by the ratio [Mn-cat]/[H₂O₂] of the catalytic species [32] indicates that the catalytic activity of both systems is similar, as expected for the systems with full accessibility of catalytic species in the pores. As an example, with a fixed Mn-cat unit/H₂O₂ ratio of 6.80 × 10⁻⁴, the Mn-cat complex immobilized into a bulk mesoporous LUS-type silica gave 19% of the dismutation of H₂O₂ in water after 1 min. When using **MSN-4a** and **MSN-4b** with a fixed Mn-cat unit/H₂O₂ ratio of 1.99 × 10⁻³, the dismutation of H₂O₂ in water after 1 min is 63% and 58%, respectively. If both activities are thus similar, the total material amount of **MSN-4b** nanocatalyst needed is five times lower than the total material amount for Mn-cat/LUS-type mesoporous bulk silica. This result confirms the interest in the elaborated strategy to design an efficient nanocatalyst working in water with an increased amount of the inserted catalytically active species (Mn-cat complex), while preserving its full activity and integrity.

Even more interesting and unexpected is the fact that the catalytic activity of **MSN-4a,b** is greater in water than in acetonitrile. Indeed, after 5 min, 100% conversion is obtained for **MSN-4a,b** in water, while it is 89% and 77% for **MSN-4a** and **MSN4b**, respectively, in acetonitrile. This can be attributed to the colloidal behavior of the nanoparticles: the nanoparticles in CH₃CN aggregate during the catalytic process which may limit access to the active catalytic centers; whereas, in water, thanks to the presence of the zwitterion, the nanoparticles show a great colloidal stability and excellent dispersibility. This increases the accessibility to its inner hydrophobic environment and thus the accessibility to the complex and its catalytic activity. Such results underline the interest of the dual functionalization developed here for the immobilization of a molecular catalyst for reactions in an aqueous medium.

To check the robustness of the nanomaterial, three successive cycles consisting of additions of the same volume of H₂O₂ in the same solution were performed (Figure 7). **MSN-4a** showing superior catalytic activity was chosen for these experiments. The results are shown in Figure 7 with the conversion of H₂O₂ in % and turnover number (TON) over time (defined as moles of O₂ evolved per mole of catalyst); the latter provides the efficiency of the catalyst. The initial rate slopes were determined in order to compare the efficiency of the system during its first use and the two following ones. There was a significant difference in the initial rate slopes with an important drop between the first and second runs with values of 0.62 s⁻¹ and 0.14 s⁻¹, while between the second and third runs, the initial rate slopes were comparable with 0.12 s⁻¹ for the latter. Furthermore, a slight delay can be observed on the second and third runs, while not present for the first run (Figure S15, ESI). Those results may suggest that at the end of the first run, the remaining state of the catalyst was different from the initial state, which is the reason for the induction
time of the second and third runs [32]. Furthermore, there is an additional decrease in the decomposition speed for the second and third cycles. Very similar results were observed with the complex immobilized within bulk silica, with a slight loss of speed and a slight delay at the beginning [32]. Such a delay was explained by the remainder of the complex being in a different state after the first run, and the loss of catalytic activity was explained by changes in the pH after the addition of hydrogen peroxide. Indeed, the catalase activity is known to be greatly affected by the acidification of the media after the additions of H₂O₂.

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Percentage of H₂O₂ decomposed over time by a suspension of **MSN-4a** in water for the 1st run (■), 2nd run (●) and 3rd run (▲).</figcaption></figure>

**4. Conclusions**

In summary, in this work, we successfully designed a new efficient hybrid nanocatalyst through the encapsulation of the bio-inspired [{Mn(bpy)(H₂O)}(μ-2-MeC₆H₄COO)₂(μ-O){Mn(bpy)(NO₃)}]NO₃ complex inside the porosity of dually functionalized stellate-raspberry-like mesostructured silica and demonstrated its catalytic activity for the dismutation reaction of hydrogen peroxide.

First, we developed a series of stellate-raspberry-like MSN with a size of ca. 72 nm presenting a dual internal-external functionalization with 1,4-pyridine and the sulfobetaine zwitterion. The preferential localization of the 1,4-pyridine moiety within the cavities inside the silica porosity and the preferential location of the sulfobetaine zwitterion on the nanoparticles' surface were performed through an in situ approach implying the growth of the silica stellate-raspberry-like architecture in presence of the templating agent concomitant with the grafting of the 1,4-pyridine siloxane, followed by the anchoring of the sulfobetaine zwitterion just before removal of the templating agent. The success of this dual internal-external functionalization was demonstrated through a bundle of structural and textural characterization techniques and systematic comparison with the pristine and the mono-functionalized, with only 1,4-pyridine or with only the sulfobetaine zwitterion stellate-like MSN. The dual-functionalized stellate-raspberry-like MSN present a size of ca. 72 nm and large size of pores (7.6–14.5 nm), which depend on the amount of 1,4-pyridine anchored and which are suitable for the encapsulation of catalytically active species of a relatively large size.

Secondly, the as-obtained stellate-raspberry-like MSN were further used for the encapsulation of the bio-inspired [{Mn(bpy)(H₂O)}(μ-2-MeC₆H₄COO)₂(μ-O){Mn(bpy)(NO₃)}]NO₃ complex through the pyridine moieties generating hydrophobic pockets in the cavities of the raspberry-stellate-like MSN, auspicious for the manganese complex encapsulation. The latter presents interesting catalase-like activity, which could be promising for the regulation of the oxidative stress, but of limited use due to its poor solubility and catalytic activity in water. We showed that its immobilization within the as-prepared stellate-raspberry-like MSN allows exploiting the catalase-mimicking activity of this manganese complex through the dismutation reaction of hydrogen peroxide in water, while the manganese complex
in the same conditions is inefficient. The obtained normalized catalytic activities for the
Mn-cat complex immobilized into stellate-raspberry-type MSN and in the porosity of the
bulk LUS-type mesoporous silica are similar, as expected for efficient porous systems
offering a full accessibility of an inserted catalytic species. However, the amount of the
nanocatalyst employed for the tests is much more favorable in comparison with the bulk
mesoporous silica. Of note, the activity of the as-obtained nanocatalysts is even greater
in water than in acetonitrile, thanks, according to our hypothesis, to the presence of the
sulfobetaine zwitterion that prevents nanoparticle aggregation in water more efficiently.
The robustness and efficiency of the nanocatalyst was confirmed through its successive
uses in water showing that its catalytic activity is maintained with minimal activity loss
after the first run. Taking into account the excellent colloidal stability of these nano-objects,
this work represents a further step toward the rational design of efficient nanocatalysts for
biomedical applications and can serve as a model nano-system for other catalytic systems
exploiting hydrophobic complexes that need to be used in aqueous media. The developed
dually functionalized stellate-raspberry-like MSN provide an appropriate environment
for the catalytic operation of the sequestered complexes in water and can even make an
improvement on their catalytic activity.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12071136/s1, Figure S1. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) from 200 °C to 1100 °C at 5 °C.min⁻¹ under air of the nanoparticles with various amount of pyridine silane: MSN (black), MSN-2 (red), MSN-1c (blue), MSN-3c (green), Figure S2. TEM images and size distribution of the nanoparticles with an increasing amount of pyridine with and without zwitterion grafted (A) **MSN**, (B) **MSN-1a**, (C) **MSN-1b**, (D) **MSN-1c**, (E) **MSN-2**, (F) **MSN-3a**, (G) **MSN-3b** and (H) **MSN-3c**, Figure S3. High Resolution TEM images of the complete nanoparticles **MSN-4b** with different magnifications, Figure S4. N₂ adsorption isotherms of silica nanoparticles with different amount of pyridine silane: **MSN** (black), **MSN-1a** (red), **MSN-1b** (blue) and **MSN-1x** (green), Figure S5. N₂ adsorption isotherms of silica nanoparticles with different amount of pyridine silane with zwitterion on the surface: **MSN-2** (black), **MSN-3a** (red), **MSN-3b** (blue) and **MSN-3c** (green), Figure S6. Pore size distribution curves calculated by BJH method of silica nanoparticles with different amount of pyridine silane: **MSN** (black), **MSN-1a** (red), **MSN-1b** (blue) and **MSN-1c** (green), Figure S7. Pore size distribution curves calculated by BJH method of silica nanoparticles with different amount of pyridine silane with zwitterion on the surface: **MSN-2** (black), **MSN-3a** (red), **MSN-3b** (blue) and **MSN-3c** (green), Figure S8. Pore size distribution curves calculated by BJH method of silica nanoparticles: **MSN** (black), **MSN-3c** (red), **MSN-4a** (blue) and **MSN-4b** (green), Figure S9. (A) Infrared spectra of **MSN** (dark), **MSN-2** (red), **MSN-1c** (blue), **MSN-3c** (green): (B) Magnification in the 1700–1300 cm⁻¹ window, Figure S10. (A) Infrared spectra of **MSN** (dark), **MSN-3c** (green) and **MSN-4b** (purple); (B) Magnification in the 1700–1300 cm⁻¹ window, Figure S11. (A) Infrared spectra of [(Mn(bpy)(H₂O))](µ-2-MeC₆H₄COO)₂(µ-O)[Mn(bpy)(NO₃)]]NO₃ (**Mn-cat**); (B) Magnification in the 1700–1300 cm⁻¹ window, Figure S12: ¹²⁹Si CPMAS solid-state NMR of MSN-1b (dark) and MSN-2 (red). CTA indicates the peaks from the remaining molecules of surfactant for both samples, Figure S13. ¹¹³C CPMAS solid-state NMR of (A): MSN-1b (dark) and MSN-2 (red) and (B): MSN-3c (blue). CTA indicates the peaks from the remaining molecules of surfactant for all samples and ssb indicates the spinning sidebands from the pyridine peaks (4, 5, 6), Figure S14. Zeta potential measurement of **MSN** (■), **MSN-2** (□), **MSN-1a** (●), **MSN-1c** (▲) and **MSN-3c** (△) as a function of pH, Figure S15: Percentage of H₂O₂ decomposed over time by a suspension of **MSN-4a** in water and its Turnover Number (TON) for the 1st run (■), 2nd run (●) and 3rd run (▲), Table S1. Composition and molar mass of the nanoparticles determined by elemental analysis, Table S2. ¹³C chemical shift of the carbons from zwitterion (left side; **MSN-2**) and pyridine functions (right side; **MSN-1c**). The carbon count goes from the silicon atom to the end of the chain (see Figure S13), Table S3. Catalytic activity: Percentage of H₂O₂ decomposed and turnover number (TON).
**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, S.S., B.A., L.B., J.L. and Y.G.; methodology, T.P., S.S., B.A., L.B., J.L. and Y.G.; validation, T.P. and B.G.-C.; formal analysis, T.P.; investigation, T.P.; resources, J.L. and Y.G.; data curation, T.P.; writing—original draft preparation, T.P., J.L. and Y.G.; writing—review and editing, S.S., B.G.-C., B.A., L.B., J.L. and Y.G.; visualization, T.P. and Y.G.; supervision, S.S., B.A., L.B., J.L. and Y.G.; project administration, J.L. and Y.G.; funding acquisition, J.L. and Y.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

**Data Availability Statement:** The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

**Abbreviations**

MSN: Mesoporous silica nanoparticles; Mn-cat: {[Mn(bpy)(H₂O))(μ-2-MeC₆H₄COO)₂(μ-O){Mn(bpy)(NO₃)}}][NO₃; TEOS: Tetraethyl orthosilicate; bpy: Bipyridine; SBS: 3-dimethyl(3-trimethoxysilyl)propyl)-ammonio)propane-1-sulfonate also known as sulfobetaine silane; CTATos: Hexadecyltrimethylammonium p-toluenesulfonate; TEAH₃: Triethanolamine; IR: Infrared; TGA: Thermogravimetric analysis; ssNMR: Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance; EDS: Energy dispersive spectroscopy; BET: Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method; TEM: Transmission electron microscopy; HRTEM: High resolution TEM; DLS: Diffusion light scattering; FBS: Fetal bovine serum; DMEM: Dulbecco's modified eagles medium; TON: Turnover number.

**References**

1. Vivero-Escoto, J.L.; Slowing, I.I.; Trewyn, B.G.; Lin, V.S. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular controlled drug delivery. *Small* **2010**, *6*, 1952–1967. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Albela, B.; Bonneviot, L. Surface molecular engineering in the confined space of templated porous silica. *New J. Chem.* **2016**, *40*, 4115–4131. [CrossRef]

3. Li, X.; Yuan, J.; Du, J.; Sui, H.; He, L. Functionalized Ordered Mesoporous Silica by Vinyltriethoxysilane for the Removal of Volatile Organic Compounds through Adsorption/Desorption Process. *Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.* **2020**, *59*, 3511–3520. [CrossRef]

4. Molnar, A.; Rac, B. Organic Transformations over Silica Materials Modified by Covalently Bonded Surface Functional Groups. *Curr. Org. Chem.* **2006**, *10*, 1697–1726. [CrossRef]

5. Narayan, R.; Nayak, U.A.-O.; Raichur, A.M.; Garg, S. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: A Comprehensive Review on Synthesis and Recent Advances. *Pharmaceutics* **2018**, *10*, 118. [CrossRef]

6. Rahikkala, A.; Pereira, S.A.P.; Figueiredo, P.; Passos, M.L.C.; Araújo, A.R.T.S.; Saraiva, M.L.M.F.S.; Santos, H.A. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Targeted and Stimuli-Responsive Delivery of Chemotherapeutics: A Review. *Adv. Biosyst.* **2018**, *2*, 1800020. [CrossRef]

7. Shylesh, S.; Samuel, P.P.; Sisodiya, S.; Singh, A.P. Periodic Mesoporous Silicas and Organosilicas: An Overview towards Catalysis. *Catal. Surv. Asia* **2008**, *12*, 266. [CrossRef]

8. Singh, B.; Na, J.; Konarova, M.; Wakihara, T.; Yamauchi, Y.; Salomon, C.; Gawande, M.B. Functional Mesoporous Silica Nanomaterials for Catalysis and Environmental Applications. *Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.* **2020**, *93*, 1459–1496. [CrossRef]

9. Tang, F.; Li, L.; Chen, D. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Biocompatibility and Drug Delivery. *Adv. Mater.* **2012**, *24*, 1504–1534. [CrossRef]

10. Kecht, J.; Schlossbauer, A.; Bein, T. Selective Functionalization of the Outer and Inner Surfaces in Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. *Chem. Mater.* **2008**, *20*, 7207–7214. [CrossRef]

11. Von Baeckmann, C.; Guillet-Nicolas, R.; Renfer, D.; Kählig, H.; Kleitz, F. A Toolbox for the Synthesis of Multifunctionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. *ACS Omega* **2018**, *3*, 17496–17510. [CrossRef]

12. Huh, S.; Wiench, J.W.; Trewyn, B.G.; Song, S.; Pruski, M.; Lin, V.S.Y. Tuning of particle morphology and pore properties in mesoporous silicas with multiple organic functional groups. *Chem. Commun.* **2003**, *18*, 2364–2365. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Vallet-Regí, M.; Balas, F.; Arcos, D. Mesoporous Materials for Drug Delivery. *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2007**, *46*, 7548–7558. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14. Nel, A.E.; Mädler, L.; Velegol, D.; Xia, T.; Hoek, E.M.V.; Somasundaran, P.; Klaessig, F.; Castranova, V.; Thompson, M. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano–bio interface. *Nat. Mater.* **2009**, *8*, 543–557. [CrossRef]

15. Wu, S.-H.; Hung, Y.; Mou, C.-Y. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as nanocarriers. *Chem. Commun.* **2011**, 9972–9985. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16. Gomes, M.C.; Cunha, Â.; Trindade, T.; Tomé, J.P.C. The role of surface functionalization of silica nanoparticles for bioimaging. *J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci.* **2016**, *9*, 1630005. [CrossRef]
17. Huang, R.; Shen, Y.-W.; Guan, Y.-Y.; Jiang, Y.-X.; Wu, Y.; Rahman, K.; Zhang, L.-J.; Liu, H.-J.; Luan, X. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: Facile surface functionalization and versatile biomedical applications in oncology. *Acta Biomater.* **2020**, *116*, 1–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18. Natarajan, S.K.; Selvaraj, S. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: Importance of surface modifications and its role in drug delivery. *RSC Adv.* **2014**, *4*, 14328–14334. [CrossRef]

19. Wieszczycka, K.; Staszak, K.; Woźniak-Budych, M.J.; Litowczenko, J.; Maciejewska, B.M.; Jurga, S. Surface functionalization–The way for advanced applications of smart materials. *Coord. Chem. Rev.* **2021**, *436*, 213846. [CrossRef]

20. Gößl, D.; Singer, H.; Chiu, H.-Y.; Schmidt, A.; Lichtnecker, M.; Engelke, H.; Bein, T. Highly active enzymes immobilized in large pore colloidal mesoporous silica nanoparticles. *New J. Chem.* **2019**, *43*, 1671–1680. [CrossRef]

21. Du, X.; Qiao, S.Z. Dendritic Silica Particles with Center-Radial Pore Channels: Promising Platforms for Catalysis and Biomedical Applications. *Small* **2015**, *11*, 392–413. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. Polshettiwar, V.; Cha, D.; Zhang, X.; Basset, J.M. High-Surface-Area Silica Nanospheres (KCC-1) with a Fibrous Morphology. *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2010**, *49*, 9652–9656. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23. Li, S.; Jiao, X.; Yang, H. Hydrophobic core/hydrophilic shell structured mesoporous silica nanospheres: Enhanced adsorption of organic compounds from water. *Langmuir* **2013**, *29*, 1228–1237. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Dai, Q.; Yang, L.; Wang, Y.; Cao, X.; Yao, C.; Xu, X. Surface charge-controlled electron transfer and catalytic behavior of immobilized cytochrome P450 BM3 inside dendritic mesoporous silica nanoparticles. *Anal. Bioanal. Chem.* **2020**, *412*, 4703–4712. [CrossRef]

25. Dardouri, R.; Navarro Yerga, R.M.; Mota, N.; Albela, B.; Bonneviot, L.; Zina, M.S. Lower methane combustion temperature on palladium nanoparticles anchored on TiOx subnano-islets in stellate mesoporous silica nanospheres. *New J. Chem.* **2020**, *44*, 906–919. [CrossRef]

26. Fihri, A.; Cha, D.; Bouhrara, M.; Almana, N.; Polshettiwar, V. Fibrous Nano-Silica (KCC-1)-Supported Palladium Catalyst: Suzuki Coupling Reactions Under Sustainable Conditions. *ChemSusChem* **2012**, *5*, 85–89. [CrossRef]

27. Fihri, A.; Bouhrara, M.; Patil, U.; Cha, D.; Saih, Y.; Polshettiwar, V. Fibrous Nano-Silica Supported Ruthenium (KCC-1/Ru): A Sustainable Catalyst for the Hydrogenolysis of Alkanes with Good Catalytic Activity and Lifetime. *ACS Catal.* **2012**, *2*, 1425–1431. [CrossRef]

28. Polshettiwar, V.; Thivolle-Cazat, J.; Taoufik, M.; Stoffelbach, F.; Norsic, S.; Basset, J.-M. "Hydro-metathesis" of Olefins: A Catalytic Reaction Using a Bifunctional Single-Site Tantalum Hydride Catalyst Supported on Fibrous Silica (KCC-1) Nanospheres. *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2011**, *50*, 2747–2751. [CrossRef]

29. Park, D.S.; Yun, D.; Choi, Y.; Kim, T.Y.; Oh, S.; Cho, J.-H.; Yi, J. Effect of 3D open-pores on the dehydration of n-butanol to di-n-butyl ether (DNBE) over a supported heteropolyacid catalyst. *Chem. Eng. J.* **2013**, *228*, 889–895. [CrossRef]

30. Bouhrara, M.; Ranga, C.; Fihri, A.; Shaikh, R.R.; Sarawade, P.; Emwas, A.-H.; Hedhili, M.N.; Polshettiwar, V. Nitridated Fibrous Silica (KCC-1) as a Sustainable Solid Base Nanocatalyst. *ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.* **2013**, *1*, 1192–1199. [CrossRef]

31. Fernández, G.; Corbella, M.; Aullón, G.; Maestro, M.A.; Mahía, J. New Dinuclear Mn<sup>III</sup> Compounds with 2-MeC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>COO and 2-FC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>COO Bridges–Effect of Terminal Monodentate Ligands (H<sub>2</sub>O, ClO<sub>4</sub><sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) on the Magnetic Properties. *Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.* **2007**, *2007*, 1285–1296. [CrossRef]

32. Garcia-Cirera, B.; Corbella, M.; Bonneviot, L.; Albela, B. Bio-inspired manganese mesoporous silica hybrid material as a water compatible antioxidant. *Microporous Mesoporous Mater.* **2018**, *261*, 150–157. [CrossRef]

33. Zhang, K.; Xu, L.L.; Jiang, J.G.; Calin, N.; Lam, K.F.; Zhang, S.J.; Wu, H.H.; Wu, G.D.; Albela, B.; Bonneviot, L.; et al. Facile large-scale synthesis of monodisperse mesoporous silica nanospheres with tunable pore structure. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2013**, *135*, 2427–2430. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

34. Estephan, Z.G.; Jaber, J.A.; Schlenoff, J.B. Zwitterion-stabilized silica nanoparticles: Toward nonstick nano. *Langmuir* **2010**, *26*, 16884–16889. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

35. Wang, Y.; Song, H.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tang, J.; Yu, C. Kinetically Controlled Dendritic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: From Dahlia- to Pomegranate-like Structures by Micelle Filling. *Chem. Mater.* **2018**, *30*, 5770–5776. [CrossRef]

36. Xiong, L.; Du, X.; Shi, B.; Bi, J.; Kleitz, F.; Qiao, S.Z. Tunable stellate mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular drug delivery. *J. Mater. Chem. B* **2015**, *3*, 1712–1721. [CrossRef]

37. Chen, S.; Chen, S.; Jiang, S.; Mo, Y.; Tang, J.; Ge, Z. Synthesis and characterization of siloxane sulfobetaine antimicrobial agents. *Surf. Sci.* **2011**, *605*, L25–L28. [CrossRef]

38. Pombo Garcia, K.; Zarschler, K.; Barbaro, L.; Barreto, J.A.; O'Malley, W.; Spiccia, L.; Stephan, H.; Graham, B. Zwitterionic-coated "stealth" nanoparticles for biomedical applications: Recent advances in countering biomolecular corona formation and uptake by the mononuclear phagocyte system. *Small* **2014**, *10*, 2516–2529. [CrossRef]