Comparison of natural prey Tetranychus turkestani,
date palm pollen, and bee pollen diets on development,
reproduction, and life table parameters of the predator
Amblyseius swirskii

Atefeh Rahmani Piyani, Parviz Shishehbor, Farhan Kocheili, Eric W Riddick

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

To cite this version:

Atefeh Rahmani Piyani, Parviz Shishehbor, Farhan Kocheili, Eric W Riddick. Comparison of natural prey Tetranychus turkestani, date palm pollen, and bee pollen diets on development, reproduction, and life table parameters of the predator Amblyseius swirskii. Acarologia, 2021, 61 (4), pp.890-900. 10.24349/G9ed-QB9h . hal-03391617v2

HAL Id: hal-03391617

https://hal.science/hal-03391617v2

Submitted on 25 Oct 2021

**HAL** is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Acarologia
Open Science in Acarology

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

Acarologia

A quarterly journal of acarology, since 1959
Publishing on all aspects of the Acari

All information:
http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/acarologia/
acarologia-contact@supagro.fr

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

OPEN ACCESS

Acarologia is proudly non-profit,
with no page charges and free open access

Please help us maintain this system by
encouraging your institutes to subscribe to the print version of the journal
and by sending us your high quality research on the Acari.

Subscriptions: Year 2021 (Volume 61): 450 €
http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/acarologia/subscribe.php

Previous volumes (2010-2020): 250 € / year (4 issues)
Acarologia, CBGP, CS 30016, 34988 MONTFERRIER-sur-LEZ Cedex, France
ISSN 0044-586X (print), ISSN 2107-7207 (electronic)

The digitalization of Acarologia papers prior to 2000 was supported by Agropolis Fondation under the reference ID 1500-024 through the « Investissements d'avenir » programme
(Labex Agro: ANR-10-LABX-0001-01)

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

agropolis fondation

Supporting agricultural research
for sustainable development

Acarologia is under **free license** and distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons-BY.
Comparison of natural prey

*Tetranychus turkestani*, date palm pollen,
and bee pollen diets on development,
reproduction, and life table parameters
of the predator *Amblyseius swirskii*

Atefeh Rahmani Piyaniª, Parviz Shishehborª, Farhan Kocheiliª, Eric W. Riddickᵇ

Original research

ABSTRACT

The predatory mite *Amblyseius swirskii* Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) is produced commercially for biological control of insects and mites on crop plants around the world. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a diet of natural prey, *Tetranychus turkestani* Ugarov and Nikolskii (Acari: Tetranychidae), date palm pollen, or bee-collected pollen on *A. swirskii* development, reproduction, and life table parameters. Completely randomized, no-choice experiments were conducted in replicated experimental units, i.e., 3 x 3 cm plastic sheets inside Petri dishes. A life table analysis was also conducted. Results indicated that diet type did not affect *A. swirskii* preimaginal survival; it ranged from 97-100% on *T. turkestani* and both pollen diets. However, total development time was significantly shorter for *A. swirskii* females fed date palm pollen than *T. turkestani* or bee pollen. Adult females fed *T. turkestani* lived longer, had longer oviposition periods, and produced more eggs. The intrinsic rate of natural increase (0.396 d⁻¹) was higher for *A. swirskii* fed date palm pollen than *T. turkestani* or bee pollen. The finite rate of increase, net reproductive rate, and gross reproductive rate did not differ significantly between *A. swirskii* fed date palm pollen or *T. turkestani*. Mean generation time (7.56 d) and population doubling time (1.043 d) were shorter for *A. swirskii* fed date palm pollen than *T. turkestani* or bee pollen. This study suggests that the *T. turkestani* diet or date palm pollen diet is suitable for *A. swirskii*. Date palm pollen has great potential as a cost effective diet to mass produce *A. swirskii* in the absence of natural prey. Future research could determine whether long-term rearing on date palm pollen reduces the ability of *A. swirskii* to locate, capture, and consume *T. turkestani* or other *Tetranychus* species on crop plants.

**Keywords** agricultural acarology; biological control; life table analysis; nutrition; rearing

Introduction

*Amblyseius swirskii* Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) is a type III generalist predatory mite, which has a wide diet range including insect and mite prey, pollen, plant exudates, and honeydew (McMurtry *et al.* 2013). More specifically, laboratory studies indicate that *A. swirskii* develops and reproduces on a diet of tetranychid mites (Riahi *et al.* 2017b), eriophyid

Received 05 May 2021
Accepted 12 October 2021
Published 21 October 2021

Corresponding author
Eric W. Riddick:
eric.riddick@usda.gov

Academic editor
Palevsky, Eric

https://doi.org/
10.24349/G9ed-QB9h

ISSN 0044-586X (print)
ISSN 2107-7207 (electronic)

Copyright
Rahmani Piyani A. et al.

Distributed under
Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0

<footnote>ªDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz 6135783151, Iran.</footnote>

<footnote>ᵇNational Biological Control Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA.</footnote>
mites (Park *et al.* 2010), tenuipalpid mites (Peña *et al.* 2009), tarsonemid mites (Abou-Awad *et al.* 2014), psyllids (Juan-Blasco *et al.* 2012), whiteflies (Medd and Greatrex 2014), thrips (Messelink *et al.* 2006), and plant pollen (Nemati *et al.* 2019). *Amblyseius swirskii* is used in augmentative biological control of pests on greenhouse-grown crops such as cucumber *Cucumis sativus* L., and sweet pepper *Capsicum anuum* L. in more than 50 countries (Knapp *et al.* 2018).

*Amblyseius swirskii* was first discovered along the eastern Mediterranean coast but has expanded its natural range throughout the Middle East and neighboring regions (Calvo *et al.* 2014). It is a candidate for augmentative biological control of the strawberry spider mite *Tetranychus turkestani* Ugarov and Nikolskii (Acari: Tetranychidae) on crop plants in greenhouses and fields in Khuzestan province, southwestern Iran, and elsewhere. *Tetranychus turkestani* is an important pest of crop plants in multiple families in the southwestern region of Iran (Mossadegh and Kocheili 2003; Sohrabi and Shishehbor 2008) and other countries including Russia (Popov 1981), USA (Jeppson *et al.* 1975), China (Li *et al.* 2014), India and some European countries (Migeon and Dorkled 2021). Characterized by frequent outbreaks coupled with acaricide resistance, this mite poses a threat to field and glasshouse crop producers (Sohrabi and Shishehbor 2008). *Tetranychus turkestani* has several generations during the growing season, tolerates high temperatures and low humidity, and has a short generation time of approximately 6 to 7 days (Sohrabi and Shishehbor 2008). Different developmental stages initially feed on the lower leaf surface but can cover an entire plant as populations increase. Early damage symptoms appear as chlorotic stripples on leaves, but large areas will turn yellow as feeding damage builds-up. Leaves may also become bronzed, and the plant can defoliate. Webbing is often very evident, giving a bright appearance to the plant (Jeppson *et al.* 1975).

Developing or improving techniques to mass produce *A. swirskii* for augmentative releases against *T. turkestani* are needed. In efforts to reduce rearing costs, factitious prey, e.g., *Carpoglyphus lactis* (L.) (Acari: Carpoglyphidae), has been used to rear *A. swirskii* (San *et al.* 2020). Yet, additional time, labor, and space will be required to maintain *C. lactis* colonies. Hence, the incorporation of a non-prey diet would be most cost-effective. Research has tested the utility of non-prey diets, e.g., plant pollen, in lieu of natural prey. For example, pollen from cattail *Typha latifolia* L., almond *Prunus amygdalus* Batsch, date palm *Phoenix dactylifera* L., castor bean *Ricinus communis* L., maize *Zea mays* L., and apricot *Prunus armeniaca* L. are potential plant pollen diets for mass rearing *A. swirskii* (Riahi *et al.* 2017a). Bee-collected pollen (from unidentified plant sources) is less suitable for *A. swirskii* development and reproduction (Goleva and Zebitz 2013; Calvo *et al.* 2014), but this is not always the case if the nutritional content of bee pollen exceeds that of date palm pollen (Khanamani *et al.* 2017). If plant pollen is readily obtained from plants grown locally or purchased from a supplier in the region, *A. swirskii* mass production could become more time and cost efficient. Culturing of tetranychids requires more time and labor because host plants must also be cultured to provide food for the tetranychids. Currently, there are no suitable artificial diets for continuous mass rearing of tetranychids (Van der Geest *et al.* 1983; He *et al.* 2019).

Although biological characteristics of *A. swirskii* fed tetranychids such as *Tetranychus urticae* Koch (Fadaei *et al.* 2018), *Panonychus citri* (McGregor) (Ji *et al.* 2013), *Eotetranychus frosti* (McGregor) (Bazgir *et al.* 2018), and *Eutetranychus orientalis* (Klein) (All-Azzazy and Alhewairini 2020) have been studied previously, no information is available on *A. swirskii* attacking or feeding on *T. turkestani* in Iran or elsewhere. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to compare the effects of natural prey *T. turkestani*, date palm pollen, and bee pollen diets on *A. swirskii* development, reproduction, and life table parameters.
# Material and methods

## Spider mite and predatory mite colonies

The *T. turkestani* used in this study originated from field bindweed *Convolvulus arvensis* L. (Solanales: Convolvulaceae) growing on the premises of the Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. A stock colony of *T. turkestani* was maintained on seedlings of cowpea *Vigna unguiculata* (L.) Walp. (Fabales: Fabaceae) grown from seeds and transplanted into compost in plastic pots (20 cm diam.) in a laboratory of the Department of Plant Protection. Infested plants were held in wooden framed rearing cages (120 × 60 × 60 cm) covered with nylon mesh, 210 µm aperture. The cages were maintained in a laboratory at 25 ± 2 °C, 50 ± 5% RH and a 16: 8 (L: D) h with illumination (4000 lux) provided by fluorescent lamps. New plants were introduced as required.

The *A. swirskii* population was obtained from laboratory colonies at Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran, which had been purchased from Koppert Biological Systems (Berkel en Rodenrijs, The Netherlands) in 2012. It was reared on *T. urticae* at Bu-Ali Sina University. At Shahid Chamran University, Department of Plant Protection, the *A. swirskii* colony was maintained in a laboratory in rearing units comprised of a plastic sheet (11 x 7 x 0.1 cm) on a foam mat maintained in humid conditions (approximately 70% RH) with distilled water in a Plexiglas box (as described by Wazler and Schausberger 1999). To provide food, cowpea leaves infested with *T. turkestani* were added to the units twice a week. Date palm pollen was also made available to immature and adult *A. swirskii* in the rearing units for several generations when *T. turkestani* immatures and adults were in short supply. The *A. swirskii* colony was reared for several generations prior to commencing the experiments.

## Pollen

Date palm production is a major industry in Ahaz city, Iran. Very fresh date palm pollen of the Stamaran cultivar was harvested directly from a tree growing in Ahvaz city in April 2019. Even if date palm pollen was not harvested from the field, it could have been purchased at a low price. In a previous study, date palm pollen sheaths were obtained from a rural supplier in Ahvaz at a cost of 3.0-3.5 USD per kg (equivalent to four sheaths); approximately 6 g of pollen grains were within each kg of sheath (Ebrahimifar et al. 2021). Commercial bee-collected pollen (of unknown plant origin) was purchased from a rural supplier in Ahvaz city. The average price of bee pollen was 12.0 USD per kg in Ahvaz (PS, personal observations). Bee pollen was stored in a freezer at -18 °C for up to four months, before experimentation.

## Experimental setup

Experimental units were prepared according to the method described by Riahi *et al.* (2017a) with some modifications. Each experimental unit was comprised of a green plastic sheet (3 x 3 cm) located on a thick foam pad, cut to a similar size (3 x 3 cm), in a plastic Petri dish (9 cm diam., 2 cm high) that was half-filled with distilled water (Figure 1). The edges of the plastic sheet were covered with moist tissue paper to prevent *A. swirskii* from escaping. In addition, a few cotton threads were placed on each plastic sheet to serve as shelter and oviposition substrates for *A. swirskii*. Eggs of *A. swirskii* (less than 24 h old) were transferred individually to each experimental unit using a fine squirrel-hair brush. After emergence of the larvae, mites were fed according to treatments, i.e., *T. turkestani* prey, date palm pollen, or bee pollen. The experimental units were monitored daily, and developmental duration and survival of immature stages were recorded. Molting was confirmed by the presence of exuviae in the experimental units. After adult emergence, each newly emerged female and male (less than 24 h old) was coupled and transferred to a new experimental unit provided with the same food they were fed in immature stages. The experimental units were checked daily and pre-oviposition period, oviposition period, post-oviposition period, adult longevity, and total fecundity were recorded. The experiments were carried-out in a completely randomized design to test the effects of diet
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1** Experimental rearing unit to test the effects of diet treatments on *A. swirskii* development and reproduction.</figcaption></figure>

treatment type on *A. swirskii* life history parameters. All experiments were conducted in a growth chamber at 25 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH and a 16L: 8D h photoperiod.

Approximately 5 mg of date palm pollen or bee pollen was added to respective treatment dishes with a single *A. swirskii* male or female. Every other day, old pollen was replaced with new pollen. In the prey treatment, live *T. turkestani* immatures and adults were added to dishes with a single *A. swirskii* male or female. Every other day, dead and uneaten *T. turkestani* were replaced with live *T. turkestani* from the stock colony. Sample sizes for female development and immature survival tests were 25, 35, and 33 individuals in *T. turkestani*, date palm pollen, and bee pollen treatments, respectively. Sample sizes for male development and immature survival tests included 20, 9, and 11 individuals in *T. turkestani*, date palm pollen, and bee pollen treatments, respectively. Sample sizes for reproduction and longevity tests included 25, 35, and 33 individuals in *T. turkestani*, date palm pollen, and bee pollen treatments, respectively. Number of replications (n) for immature development (female and male), reproduction and longevity (female and male) of diet treatments are listed in Tables 1, 2, and 3.

**Statistical analysis**

The datasets were first verified for normal distribution by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Developmental time, immature survival, preoviposition period, oviposition period, postoviposition period, adult longevity, and total fecundity of *A. swirskii* fed different diets were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA). Immature survival data were arcsine transformed to homogenize variances prior to the one-way ANOVA. Means were separated using Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test at $\alpha = 0.05$. SPSS version 22 statistical software (SPSS for windows, SPSS Institute Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.) was used for data analysis.
Life table parameters are important in defining the effects of external factors on populations (Birch 1948). Life table parameters can confirm which diets are most suitable for predator life history parameters (Grenier and De Clercq 2003). In the context of this study, they were used to confirm results obtained from experiments determining the effects of three diets on *A. swirskii* development and reproduction. An age-stage, two-sex life-table procedure (Chi and Liu 1985) was selected for data analysis to account for variable development rates among individuals and stages of development of *A. swirskii* fed different diets. Life table, i.e., population growth parameters including net reproductive rate (*R*₀), gross reproductive rate (*GRR*), intrinsic rate of natural increase (*r*<sub>m</sub>), finite rate of increase (*λ*), and mean generation time (*T*) were calculated with the TWOSEX-MSChart program (Chi 2018). Population doubling time (*DT*), the number of days required for the *A. swirskii* population to double in numbers, was also calculated *DT = ln(2)/r*<sub>m</sub>. Standard error (SE) of the population growth parameters was obtained using the bootstrap technique and multiple comparisons were made by the paired bootstrap test with 100,000 samples (Maia *et al.* 2000).

Results

Immature development and survival rate

The time in the egg stage was shortest for *A. swirskii* in the date palm pollen treatment than the *T. turkestani* or bee pollen treatments. Parental females and males in the stock colony had exposure to date palm pollen, *T. turkestani*, but not bee pollen. The protonymph stage was shorter for females and males in the date palm pollen treatment than the *T. turkestani* treatment. Total developmental time of *A. swirskii* females and males was affected significantly by diet type (females: F = 40.83; df = 2, 90; P < 0.001; males: F = 6.64; df = 2, 37; P = 0.003) (Tables 1 and 2). Total development time was significantly shorter for females fed date palm pollen than *T. turkestani* or bee pollen (Table 1). It was significantly shorter for males fed date palm pollen than *T. turkestani* or bee pollen (Table 2). Diet type had no significant effect on percent survival rate of males and females, combined (F = 1.50; df = 2, 6; P = 0.29); it was 100 ± 0.00a, 98.22 ± 1.82a, and 97.78 ± 1.81a for *A. swirskii* fed *T. turkestani*, date palm pollen, and bee pollen, respectively.

Diet type had a significant effect on pre-oviposition (F = 31.64; df = 2, 90; P < 0.001), oviposition (F = 43.12; df = 2, 90; P < 0.001) and post-oviposition (F = 12.66; df = 2, 90; P < 0.001) periods of *A. swirskii* females (Table 3). Pre-oviposition period was longest for females fed bee pollen rather than date palm pollen or *T. turkestani*. Oviposition and post-oviposition periods were longest for females fed *T. turkestani* than date palm pollen or bee pollen. Diet type had a significant effect on total fecundity (F = 31.64; df = 2, 90; P < 0.001; Table 3); females fed *T. turkestani* laid 1.7 and 5.7 times more eggs than females fed date palm pollen and bee pollen, respectively.

Significant differences in longevity were observed amongst the diets (F = 65.57; df = 2, 90; P < 0.001 for females; F = 13.91; df = 2, 37; P < 0.001 for males; Table 3). Both *A. swirskii* females and males lived longer when fed the *T. turkestani* diet rather than the date palm pollen or bee pollen diet. Longevity of *T. turkestani*-fed females and males was 34.57 d and 34.15 d, respectively (Table 3). Longevity of date palm pollen-fed and bee pollen-fed females (or males) did not differ significantly.

Life table analysis

Life table analysis confirmed that diet type had significant effects on *A. swirskii* life history (Table 4). The highest intrinsic rate of natural increase (*r*<sub>m</sub>) was observed for *A. swirskii* fed date palm pollen rather than *T. turkestani* or bee pollen. The finite rate of increase (*λ*), net reproductive rate (*R*₀), and gross reproductive rate (*GRR*) did not differ significantly between *A. swirskii* fed date palm pollen or *T. turkestani*. But *A. swirskii* fed bee pollen had the lowest
intrinsic and finite rates of increase and the lowest net and gross reproductive rates. Mean generation time (*T*) and population doubling time (*DT*) were significantly shorter for *A. swirskii* fed date palm pollen rather than *T. turkestani* or bee pollen (Table 4). Note that *A. swirskii* fed bee pollen had the longest mean generation and population doubling times.

Discussion

Diet type had a distinct influence on immature development of *A. swirskii* in this study. Total development time was shortest when *A. swirskii* immatures were fed the date palm pollen diet. Perhaps, nutrients in date palm pollen were easier to digest or assimilate than those in bee pollen or *T. turkestani*. A comparison of macronutrients, i.e., amino acids, lipids, carbohydrates, minerals, and phytochemicals, amongst the three diets would be necessary to help explain these results. In addition, geographic origin, climatic conditions, and soil type of individual plants from which date palm pollen and bee pollen originated could have influenced nutritional quality. The plant origin of bee pollen in this study was unknown. The plant species represented in the bee-collected pollen can have important consequences on its nutritional quality, i.e., amino acid profile and content (Taha *et al.* 2019).

The developmental time of 4.20 d for *A. swirskii* females fed date palm pollen in this study was short when compared to 9.09 d reported by Riahi *et al.* (2017a) and 8.3 d reported by Nemati *et al.* (2019). The developmental time of 5.79 d for females fed bee pollen in this study was also short in comparison to 10.38 d reported by Riahi *et al.* (2017a). Note that almond pollen, castor bean pollen, and date palm pollen were superior to bee-collected pollen as a diet to support the development of the phytoseiid *Neoseiulus cucumeris* (Oudemans) (Yazdanpanah *et al.* 2021). The authors indicated that bee pollen had the lowest nutritional value for *N. cucumeris*. In contrast, Khanamani *et al.* (2017) indicated that date palm pollen was inferior to bee pollen (collected from unidentified plant species), probably because the proportion of protein, lipids, and sugars were significantly lower in date palm pollen.

Prior research has not tested the effects of a diet of *T. turkestani* on development time of *A. swirskii*. Total development time of *A. swirskii* fed *T. turkestani* (at 25 °C, 5.97 d for females and 5.50 d for males) in this study was shorter than for *A. swirskii* fed *T. urticae* (7.60 d. Riahi *et al.* 2017a), *T. urticae* (6.89 d, Fadaei *et al.* 2018), *E. frosti* (6.94 d, Bazgir *et al.* 2018), and *E. orientalis* (11.17 d, All-Azzazy and Alhewairini 2020). Also, *T. turkestani*-fed *A. swirskii* developed faster than their prey. For example, development time of *T. turkestani* was approximately 10 d at 25°C (Bazazzadeh *et al.* 2020). Development time of *A. swirskii* fed *T. turkestani* in this study was also shorter than the development time reported for potential insect prey such as *Bemisia tabaci* (Gennadius) Bet-Dagen strain (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) (6.3 d, after modification, Nomokou *et al.* 2001), and two thripids *Frankliniella occidentalis* (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and *Thrips tabaci* Lindeman (7.8 d at 25°C, Wimmer

<table><caption>**Table 1** Mean (± SE) immature development time (d) of *Amblyseius swirskii* females fed different diets.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Parameters</th><th colspan="3">Natural prey and pollen diets</th></tr><tr><th><i>T. turkestani</i><br>(n = 25)</th><th>Date palm pollen<br>(n = 35)</th><th>Bee pollen<br>(n = 33)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Egg incubation period (d)</td><td>1.96 ± 0.08 a</td><td>1.59 ± 0.08 b</td><td>1.83 ± 0.05 a</td></tr><tr><td>Larva (d)</td><td>0.86 ± 0.05 a</td><td>0.70 ± 0.04 b</td><td>0.70 ± 0.04 b</td></tr><tr><td>Protonymph (d)</td><td>1.86 ± 0.10 a</td><td>1.01 ± 0.04 b</td><td>1.80 ± 0.08 b</td></tr><tr><td>Deutonymph (d)</td><td>1.28 ± 0.09 a</td><td>0.97 ± 0.05 a</td><td>1.86 ± 0.08 a</td></tr><tr><td>Total (d)</td><td>5.97 ± 0.13 a</td><td>4.20 ± 0.08 b</td><td>5.79 ± 0.16 a</td></tr></tbody></table>

Values in rows followed by the same small letter are not significantly different, using the Tukey test at 5% significance level. n = number of individuals reaching the adult stage.
<table><caption>**Table 2** Mean (± SE) immature development time (d) of *Amblyseius swirskii* males fed different diets.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Parameters</th><th colspan="3">Natural prey and pollen diets</th></tr><tr><th><i>T. turkestani</i><br>(n = 20)</th><th>Date palm pollen<br>(n = 9)</th><th>Bee pollen<br>(n = 11)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Egg incubation period (d)</td><td>2.05 ± 0.10 a</td><td>1.56 ± 0.53 c</td><td>1.84 ± 0.09 b</td></tr><tr><td>Larva (d)</td><td>0.95 ± 0.06 a</td><td>0.72 ± 0.16 ab</td><td>0.67 ± 0.07 b</td></tr><tr><td>Protonymph (d)</td><td>1.45 ± 0.10 a</td><td>0.89 ± 0.22 b</td><td>1.50 ± 0.19 a</td></tr><tr><td>Deutonymph (d)</td><td>1.06 ± 0.11 a</td><td>0.84 ± 0.25 b</td><td>1.38 ± 0.17 a</td></tr><tr><td>Total (d)</td><td>5.50 ± 0.18 a</td><td>4.13 ± 0.13 c</td><td>5.11 ± 0.42 b</td></tr></tbody></table>

Values in rows followed by the same small letter are not significantly different, using the Tukey test at 5% significance level. n = number of individuals reaching the adult stage.

et al. 2008). The ability of *A. swirskii* to develop faster than prey species has profound implications for augmentative biological control. It suggests that augmentative releases of *A. swirskii* could eliminate pest populations in the greenhouse or open field.

Diet type had a distinct effect on reproduction (fecundity) in this study. The observation that *A. swirskii* produced more progeny, i.e., more eggs, when fed the *T. turkestani* diet (rather than the date palm pollen or bee pollen diet) could suggest that the quantity or quality of macronutrients necessary for ovary (gonad) development and egg maturation are greater in *T. turkestani*. Unfortunately, the macronutrient profile in *T. turkestani* is unknown and specific nutrients that could stimulate *A. swirskii* oviposition have not been reported. Note that *A. swirskii* reproduction (fecundity) was greatest on a diet of *T. turkestani* (this study) than on a diet of *T. urticae* (Abou-Awad et al. 1992; Riahi et al. 2017a, b; Fadaei et al. 2018), *E. frosti* (Bazgir et al. 2018), *E. orientalis* (All-Azzazy and Alhewairini 2020), *B. tabaci* (Nomokou et al. 2001), *F. occidentalis*, or *T. tabaci* (Wimmer et al. 2008). These observations suggest that a diet of *T. turkestani* is suitable for *A. swirskii* reproduction.

Although the *T. turkestani* diet was best for *A. swirskii* reproduction, this observation does not diminish the value of the date palm pollen diet. In prior research, *A. swirskii* fecundity was greatest on a diet of date palm pollen rather than eggs of two scale insects *Insulaspis pallidula* (Green) and *Phoenicococcus marlatti* Cockerell (Homoptera: Diaspididae) (Abou-Elella et al. 2013). Similarly, *A. swirskii* fecundity was greater on a diet of date palm pollen than a diet of *T. urticae* eggs or immatures, but less than on a diet of *E. orientalis* immatures or adults (Ali and Zaher 2007). Date palm pollen contains sterols, saponins, flavonoids, fatty acids, amino

<table><caption>**Table 3** Mean (± SE) pre-oviposition, oviposition, post-oviposition, longevity, and fecundity of *Amblyseius swirskii* adults fed different diets.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Parameters</th><th colspan="3">Natural prey and pollen diets</th></tr><tr><th><i>T. turkestani</i><br>(n = 25)</th><th>Date palm pollen<br>(n = 35)</th><th>Bee pollen<br>(n = 33)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pre-oviposition period (d)</td><td>2.24 ± 0.09 b</td><td>1.71 ± 0.15 b</td><td>5.00 ± 0.5 a</td></tr><tr><td>Oviposition period (d)</td><td>20.40 ± 1.60 a</td><td>10.29 ± 0.60 b</td><td>11.69 ± 1.02 b</td></tr><tr><td>Post-oviposition period (d)</td><td>5.96 ± 1.24 a</td><td>1.83 ± 0.74 b</td><td>1.94 ± 0.25 b</td></tr><tr><td>Female longevity (d)</td><td>34.57 ± 1.34 a</td><td>26.64 ± 0.75 b</td><td>24.33 ± 1.65 b</td></tr><tr><td>Male longevity (d)</td><td>34.15 ± 1.85 a</td><td>23.83 ± 1.65 b</td><td>21.83 ± 1.63 b</td></tr><tr><td>Total fecundity (eggs/fem)</td><td>45.52 ± 1.51 a</td><td>25.77 ± 1.56 b</td><td>7.97 ± 0.66 c</td></tr></tbody></table>

Values in rows followed by the same small letter are not significantly different, using the Tukey test at 5% significance level. n = number of reproducing females observed.
<table><caption>**Table 4** Estimated life table parameters of *Amblyseius swirskii* fed different diets. Values are expressed as means ± SE.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Parameters</th><th colspan="3">Natural prey and pollen diets</th></tr><tr><th>T. turkestani</th><th>Date palm pollen</th><th>Bee pollen</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Intrinsic rate of increase (r<sub>m</sub>)(d<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>0.291 ± 0.014 b</td><td>0.396 ± 0.013 a</td><td>0.159 ± 0.123 c</td></tr><tr><td>Finite rate of increase (λ)(d<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>1.338 ± 0.019 a</td><td>1.486 ± 0.021 a</td><td>1.123 ± 0.015 b</td></tr><tr><td>Net reproductive rate (R<sub>0</sub>) (offspring)</td><td>25.28 ± 3.48 a</td><td>20.04 ± 1.99 a</td><td>5.67 ± 0.71 b</td></tr><tr><td>Gross reproductive rate (GRR)</td><td>28.29 ± 3.48 a</td><td>24.55 ± 1.99 a</td><td>5.88 ± 0.71 b</td></tr><tr><td>Mean generation time (T) (d)</td><td>11.09 ± 1.22 b</td><td>7.56 ± 1.12 c</td><td>12.88 ± 1.29 a</td></tr><tr><td>Doubling time (DT) (d)</td><td>1.753 ± 0.001 b</td><td>1.043 ± 0.062 c</td><td>2.394 ± 0.008 a</td></tr></tbody></table>

Values in rows followed by the same small letter are not significantly different, using the paired bootstrap test at 5% significance level.

acids, and other components that purportedly improve fertility in humans (Tahvilzadeh et al. 2016). The presence of these nutrients at suitable concentrations could affect the fecundity of *A. swirskii*. More research is necessary to identify the nutrients in date palm pollen and to manipulate their concentrations to maximize reproduction in *A. swirskii* and other phytoseiids in mass rearing systems.

Diet type also affected longevity (adult lifespan) of *A. swirskii* in this study; *A. swirskii* males and females lived longer when fed *T. turkestani* than date palm pollen or bee pollen. Many highly fecund arthropod species are not long-lived because energy and resources are diverted to oviposition rather than body maintenance (Hosking et al. 2019). The observation that the most fecund *A. swirskii* females (fed the *T. turkestani* diet) lived longer in this study does not follow this pattern. More research on the potential association between fecundity and longevity in phytoseiids is warranted. If phytoseiid females emerge as adults with only one or two mature eggs in their ovaries, it is possible that long-lived females generate more eggs than short-lived ones over time. The rate at which eggs mature in the ovaries of phytoseiids would also provide clues to whether fecundity and longevity are positively or negatively related. Research on egg maturation or ovarian dynamics in phytoseiids is scarce (Di Palma and Alberti 2001).

The benefits of date palm pollen and *T. turkestani* diets on *A. swirskii* development and reproduction was confirmed by a life table analysis. Although intrinsic rate of natural increase (r<sub>m</sub>) was greatest for *A. swirskii* fed the date palm pollen rather than *T. turkestani*, the finite rate of increase (λ), net reproductive rate (R<sub>0</sub>), and gross reproductive rate (GRR) did not differ significantly between the two diets. The observation that mean generation time (T) and doubling time (DT) were least for *A. swirskii* fed date palm pollen (rather than *T. turkestani*) suggests that *A. swirskii* will require less time to complete a generation and double in population size when fed date palm pollen.

The highest intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm) in this study was recorded when *A. swirskii* was fed date palm pollen (0.396 d<sup>-1</sup>). This value is higher than those reported by Riahi et al. (2017a) (0.080 d<sup>-1</sup>), Fadaei et al. (2019) (0.050 d<sup>-1</sup>) and Nemati et al. (2019) (0.031 d<sup>-1</sup>) for *A. swirskii* fed date palm pollen. These dissimilarities might be explained by disparities in freshness of date palm pollen or differences in date palm cultivar. A follow-up study to examine date palm pollen quality in relation to freshness, cultivar, and geographic location would be informative.

In addition, the r<sub>m</sub> value calculated for *A. swirskii* fed date palm pollen in this study was higher than the r<sub>m</sub> value reported for *A. swirskii* fed cattail pollen (0.158 d<sup>-1</sup>), a commonly used and recommended food to maintain *A. swirskii* laboratory colonies (Lee and Gillespie 2011). Furthermore, the r<sub>m</sub> found in this study was higher than those reported for *A. swirskii* fed *T. urticae* (0.167 d<sup>-1</sup>) (El-Leithy and Fouly 1992), the western flower thrip *F. occidentalis* (0.056 d<sup>-1</sup>), and onion thrip *T. tabaci* (0.024 d<sup>-1</sup>) (Wimmer et al. 2008), and the eriophyoid fig mites
*Aceria ficus* (Cotte) (0.155 d⁻¹) and *Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae* Keifer (0.122 d⁻¹) (Abou-Awad *et al.* 2000), tomato russet mite *Aculops lycopersici* (Massee) (0.201 d⁻¹) (Park *et al.* 2011), and cotton whitefly *B. tabaci* (0.213 d⁻¹) (Nomikou *et al.* 2001).

In conclusion, date palm pollen has great potential as a diet to support *A. swirskii* in a cost-effective mass rearing system. Date palm pollen is readily available in Iran, easily harvested, amenable to cold storage, and very inexpensive to purchase. In contrast, additional labor costs and rearing space would be required to maintain a *T. turkestani* colony and host plants as food. Host plants are necessary because a satisfactory artificial diet for *T. turkestani* is not available. Although factitious prey, e.g., *C. lactis*, is available for *A. swirskii* (San *et al.* 2020), additional time, labor, and space will be required to maintain *C. lactis* colonies. Therefore, the incorporation of a non-prey diet would be most cost-effective. Although the date palm pollen diet would be more advantageous for mass rearing of *A. swirskii*, future research must determine if long-term rearing on this diet would cause any deterioration of the colony. Research is also necessary to determine if long-term rearing on date palm pollen reduces the capacity of *A. swirskii* to locate, capture, and consume natural prey, such as *T. turkestani*, on plants in greenhouses or open fields.

## Acknowledgements

The authors thank the research deputy of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz for supporting this research. Two anonymous peer reviewers commented on a previous version of this manuscript. The U.S. Government has the right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright of this article. This article reports the results of research only. Mention of a commercial or proprietary product does not constitute an endorsement of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.

## References

* Abou-Awad B.A., Reda A., Elsawi S. 1992. Effects of artificial and natural diets on the development and reproduction of two phytoseiid mites *Amblyseius gossipi* and *Amblyseius swirskii* (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci., 13: 441-445. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400013746

* Abou-Awad B.A., El-Sawaf B.M., Abdel-Khalek A.A. 2000. Impact of two eriophyoid fig mites, *Aceria ficus* and *Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae*, as prey on postembryonic development and oviposition rate of the predacious mite *Amblyseius swirskii*. Acarologia, 40: 367-371.

* Abou-Awad B.A., Hafez S.M., Farhat B.M. 2014. Biological studies of the predacious mite *Amblyseius swirskii*, a predator of the broad mite *Polyphagotarsonemus latus* on pepper plants (Acari: Phytoseiidae: Tarsonemidae). Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot., 47: 349-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2013.809908

* Abou-Elella G.M., Saber S.A., El-Sawi S.A. 2013. Biological aspects and life tables of the predacious mites, *Typhlodromips swirskii* (Athias-Henriot) and *Euseius scutalis* (Athias-Henriot) feeding on two scale insect species and plant pollen. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot., 46: 1717-1725. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2013.774715

* Ali F.S., Zaher M.A. 2007. Effect of food and temperature on the biology of *Typhlodrompis swirskii* (Athias-Henriot) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). ACARINES: J. Egypt. Soc. Acarol., 1: 17-21. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajesa.2007.4986

* All-Azzazy M.M., Alhewairini S.S. 2020. Effect of temperature and humidity on development, reproduction, and predation rate of *Amblyseius swirskii* (Phytoseiidae) fed on *Phyllocoptruta oleivore* (Eriophyiidae) and *Eutetranychus orientalis* (Tetranychidae). Int. J. Acarol., 46: 304-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647954.2020.1773922

* Bazgir F., Shakarami J., Jafari SH. 2018. Life table and predation rate of *Amblyseius swirskii* (Acari: Phytoseiidae) fed on *Eotetranychus frosti* (Tetranychidae) and *Cenopalpus irani* (Tenuipalpidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol., 23: 1614-1626. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.23.8.11

* Bazazzadeh F., Shishehbor P., Esfandiari M., Farahi S. 2020. Development, reproduction and life table parameters of *Tetranychus turkestani* (Acari: Tetranychidae) on three different host plants. Acarologia, 60: 643-655. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20204393

* Birch L.C. 1948. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J. Anim. Ecol., 17: 15-26. https://doi.org/10.2307/1605

* Calvo F.J., Knapp M., Yvonne M., Houten V., Hoogerbrugge H., Belda J.E. 2014. *Amblyseius swirskii*: What made this predatory mite such a successful biocontrol agent? Exp. Appl. Acarol., 65: 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-014-9873-0
Chi H., Liu H. 1985. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sinica, 24: 225-240.

Chi H. 2018. TWOSEX-MSChart: a computer program for the age-stage, two-sex life-table analysis. http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/prod02.htm

Di Palma A., Alberti G. 2001. Fine structure of the female genital system in phytoseiid mites with remarks on egg nutrimentary development, sperm-access system, sperm transfer, and capacitation (Acari, Gamasida, Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 25, 525-591.

Ebrahimifar J., Shishehbor P., Rasekh A., Hemmati S.A., Riddick E.W. 2021. Evaluation of *Artemia franciscana* cysts to improve diets for mass rearing *Stethorus gilvifrons*, a predator of *Tetranychus turkestani*. Insects, 12: 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12070632

El-Laithy A.Y.M., Fouly H. 1992. Life table parameters of the two phytoseiid predators *Amblyseius scutalis* (Athias-Henriot) and *A. swirskii* A.-H. (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Egypt. J. Appl. Entomol., 113: 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1992.tb00631.x

Fadaei E., Hakimitabar M., Seiedy M., Sarraf Moaieri H.R. 2018. Effects of different diets on biological parameters of the predatory mite *Amblyseius swirskii* (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol., 44: 341-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647954.2018.1525428

Goleva I., Zebitz C.P.W. 2013. Suitability of different pollen as alternative food for the predatory mite *Amblyseius swirskii* (Acari, Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 61: 259-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-013-9700-z

Grenier S., De Clercq P. 2003. Comparison of artificially vs. naturally reared natural enemies and their potential for use in biological control. In: van Lenteren J.C. (Ed.) Quality control and production of biological control agents: theory and testing procedures. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp. 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851996882.0115

He Y., Lv J., Wang E., Xu X. 2019. Reproductive performance and transcriptome analyses of *Tetranychus urticae* when feeding on bean leaves and an artificial diet. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 24: 1272-1283. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.24.7.11

Hosking C.J., Raubenheimer D., Charleston M.A., Simpson S.J., Senior A.M. 2019. Macronutrient intakes and the lifespan-fecundity trade-off: a geometric framework agent-based model. J. Royal Soc. Interface, 16:20180733. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0733

Jeppson L.R., Keifer H.H., Buker E.W. 1975. Mites injurious to economic plants. Univ. Calif. Press. Berkeley, pp. 614. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520335431

Ji J., Lin T., Zhang Y., Lin J., Sun L., Chen X. 2013. A comparison between *Amblyseius (Typhlodromips) swirskii* and *Amblyseius eharai* with *Panonychus citri* (Acari: Tetranychidae) as prey: developmental duration, life table and predation. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 18: 123-129. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.18.2.4

Juan-Blasco M., Oureshi J.A., Urbaneja A., Stansly P.A. 2012. Predatory mite, *Amblyseius swirskii* (Acari: Phytoseiidae), for biological control of Asian citrus psyllid, *Diaphorina citri* (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Fla. Entomol., 95: 543-551. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0302

Khanamani M., Fathipour Y., Talebi A.A., Mehrabadi M. 2017. Linking pollen quality and performance of *Neoseiulus californicus* (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in two-spotted spider mite management programmes. Pest Manag. Sci., 73: 452-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4305

Knapp M., van Houten Y., van Ball E., Groot T. 2018. Use of the predatory mites in commercial biocontrol: current status and future prospects. Acarologia, 58 (Suppl): 72-82. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20184275

Lee H., Gillespie D. 2011. Life table and development of *Amblyseius swirskii* (Acari: Phytoseiidae) at different temperatures. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 53: 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-010-9385-5

Li G.Y., Li J.J., Xia W., Qu H.L., Yang S., Zhang J.P. 2014. Effects of Bt+ Cp T1 transgenic cotton on the performance of *Tetranychus turkestani* (Acari: Tetranychidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol., 19: 236-247. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.19.2.14

Maia A.H.N., Alfredo J.B., Campanhola C. 2000. Statistical influence on associated fertility life table parameters using Jackknife technique: computational aspects. J. Econ. Entomol., 93: 511-518. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.2.511

McMurtry J.A., Moraes G.J., Famah Sourasson, N.F. 2013. Revision of the lifestyle of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 18: 297-320. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.18.4.1

Medd N.C., Greatrex R.M. 2014. An evaluation of three predatory mite species for the control of greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum). Pest Manag. Sci., 70. 1492-1496. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3794

Messelink G.J., Van Steenpaal E.F., Ramakers P.M.J. 2006. Evaluation of phytoseiid predators for control of western flower thrips on greenhouse cucumber. BioControl, 51: 753-768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9013-9

Migeon A., Dorkled F. 2021. Spider Mites Web: a comprehensive database for the Tetranychidae. Available from: http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/spmweb (Accessed 14/08/2021)

Mossadegh M.S., Kocheili F. 2003. A semi-descriptive checklist of identified species of arthropods (agricultural, medical) and other pests from Khuzestan, Iran. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz Press, Ahvaz, Iran.

Nemati A., Riahi E., Khalili Moghadam A., Gwiazdowicz D.J., Bahari M.R., Amini P. 2019. Comparison of different pollen grains and a factitious prey as food sources for *Amblyseius swirskii* (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol., 24: 2427-2438. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.24.12.10

Nomikou M., Janssen A., Schraag R., Sabelis M.W. 2001. Phytoseiid predators as potential biological control agents for *Bemisia tabaci*. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 25: 271-291. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017976725685
Overmeer W.P.J. 1985. Alternative prey and other food resources. In Helle W., Sabelis M.W. (Eds.), World crop pests. Spider mites. Their biology, natural enemies and control. Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp: 131-139.

Park H., Shipp L., Buitenhuis R. 2010. Predation, development, and oviposition by the predatory mite *Amblyseius swirskii* (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on tomato russet mite (Acari: Eriophyidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 103: 563-569. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC09161

Park H.-H., Shipp L., Buitenhuis R., Ahn J.J. 2011. Life history parameters of a commercially available *Amblyseius swirskii* (Acari: Phytoseiidae) fed on cattail (*Typha latifolia*) pollen and tomato russet mite (*Aculops lycopersici*). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol., 14: 497-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2011.07.010

Peña J.E., Rodrigues J.C.V., Roda A., Carrillo D., Osborne L.S. 2009. Predator-prey dynamics and strategies for control of the red palm mite (*Raoiella indica*) (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) in areas of invasion in the Neotropics. IOBC WPRS Bull, 50: 69-79.

Popov S. J. 1981. Survival tables and biological parameters of the spider mite *Tetranychus turkestani*. *Izvestia Timiryazevskoi Kakhazyaistvennoi Akademii, 1: 124-133.

Riahi E., Fathipour Y., Talebi A.A., Mehrabadi M. 2017a. Linking life table and consumption rate of *Amblyseius swirskii* (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in presence and absence of different pollens. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 110: 244-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saw091

Riahi E., Fathipour Y., Talebi A.A., Mehrabadi M. 2017b. Natural diets versus factitious prey: Comparative effects on development, fecundity and life table of *Amblyseius swirskii* (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol., 22: 711-723. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.22.5.10

San P.P., Tuda M., Nakahira K., Takagi M. 2020. Optimal rearing medium for the population growth of the predatory mite, *Amblyseius swirskii* (Athias-Henriot) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 30: 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00332-y

Schausberger, P., Croft, B.A. 1999. Activity, feeding and development among larvae of specialist and generalist phytoseiid mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol., 28: 322-329.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/28.2.322

Sohrabi F., Shishehbor P. 2008. Effects of host plant and temperature on growth and reproduction of the strawberry spider mite *Tetranychus turkestani* Ugarov & Nikolskii (Acari: Tetranychidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol., 13: 26-32. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.13.1.2

Taha E.-K.A., Al-Kahtani S., Taha, R. 2019. Protein content and amino acids composition of bee-pollens from major floral sources in Al-Ahsa, eastern Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 19: 232-237.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.06.003

Tahvilzadeh M., Hajimahmoodi M., Rahimi R. 2016. The role of date palm (*Phoenix dactylifera* L.) pollen in fertility: A comprehensive review of current evidence. J. Evidence-Based Comp. Alter. Med., 21: 320-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587215609851

Van der Geest L.P.S., Bosse Th.C., Veerman A. 1983. Development of an artificial diet for the two-spotted spider mite *Tetranychus urticae*. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 33: 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1983.tb03272.x

Wazler A., Schausberger P. 1999. Predation preferences and discrimination between con- and heterospecific prey by phytoseiid mites *Phytoseiulus persimilis* and *Neoseiulus californicus*. BioControl, 43: 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009974918500

Wimmer D., Hoffmann D., Schausberger P. 2008. Prey suitability of western flower thrips, *Frankliniella occidentalis*, and onion thrips, *Thrips tabaci*, for the predatory mite *Amblyseius swirskii*. Biocontrol Sci. Technol., 18: 533-542. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150802029784

Yazdanpanah S., Fathipour Y., Riahi E. 2021. Pollen grains are suitable alternative food for rearing the commercially used predatory mite *Neoseiulus cucumeris* (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Sys. Appl. Acarol., 26: 109-1020. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.26.5.14