# A tool-box for designing an agroecological transition with local stakeholders

Elise Audouin, Jacques-Eric Bergez, Gaël Plumecocq, Olivier Therond

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Elise Audouin, Jacques-Eric Bergez, Gaël Plumecocq, Olivier Therond. A tool-box for designing an agroecological transition with local stakeholders. 12. Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE), Jun 2017, Budapest, Hungary. 35 p. hal-01607886

HAL Id: hal-01607886

https://hal.science/hal-01607886

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
# PROGRAMME ANR - AGROBIOSPHERE 2013

## Projet ANR-13-AGRO-0006-01

## TATABOX

Transition agroécologique des territoires : une boîte à outil pour concevoir et mettre en œuvre une transition agroécologique des territoires agricoles avec les acteurs locaux.

Date de début du projet: 16 janvier 2014

Durée: 48 mois

Production non identifiée comme livrable: Presentation for the 12th conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, 20th to 23rd of June 2017 in Budapest (Hungary), on "Ecological Economics in action: building a reflective and inclusive community" in the parallel session « Science-society contributions to sustainability transformation: citizens science, Community-Based Research, Participatory Action Research, Responsible Research and Innovation», titled: "TATA-BOX: "Territorial Agroecological Transition in Action": a tool-Box for designing an agroecological transition with local stakeholders"

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="3">Dissemination Level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PU</td><td>Public</td><td>☒</td></tr><tr><td>AN</td><td>Restreint aux membres d'autres projets ANR (Commission ANR incluse)</td><td>☐</td></tr><tr><td>RE</td><td>Restreint à un groupe désigné par le consortium (Commission ANR incluse)</td><td>☐</td></tr><tr><td>CO</td><td>Confidentiel, uniquement pour les membres (Commission ANR incluse)</td><td>☐</td></tr></tbody></table>
TATABOX vise à tester et adapter une méthodologie pour aider les acteurs agricoles locaux à développer une vision de la transition agroécologique souhaitable et à la gérer. Le projet implique 9 unités de recherche et 986 ETP. Les chercheurs sont de différentes disciplines permettant une bonne analyse des différents processus en jeu : agronomes, zootechniciens, écologues, sciences de l'informatique, ergonomes, sciences de gestion, géographie sociale, économistes. Le cas d'étude est un grand bassin versant agricole dans la partie sud-ouest de la France (Aveyron et Tarn-et-Garonne).

E-mail : jacques-eric.bergez@inra.fr

Internet : http://www6.inra.fr/tatabox

Auteurs de ce livrable :

Elise Audouin,
Unité de recherche : INRA, UMR 1248 AGIR
E-mail : elise.audouin@inra.fr

Jacques-Éric Bergez,
Unité de recherche : INRA, UMR 1248 AGIR
E-mail : jacques-eric.bergez@inra.fr

Gaël Plumecocq,
Unité de recherche : INRA, UMR 1248 AGIR
E-mail : gael.plumecocq@inra.fr

Olivier Therond,
Unité de recherche : INRA, UMR 1248 AGIR
E-mail : olivier.therond@inra.fr

Clause de non-responsabilité :

Ce manuscrit a été rédigé dans le cadre du projet TATABOX, financé par l'Agence Nationale de la Recherche au travers du programme AGROBIOSPHERE 2013. Son contenu ne représente en aucun cas la position officielle de l'Agence Nationale de la Recherche et est entièrement sous la responsabilité de son(ses) auteur(s). L'information contenue dans ce document est délivrée telle quelle. Il appartient au lecteur d'utiliser ces informations avec discernement.
tatabox

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

Territorial Agroecological Transition in Action

# A tool-box for designing an agroecological transition with local stakeholders

Elise Audouin

Jacques-Eric Bergez

Gaël Plumecocq

Olivier Therond

UMR AGIR

INRA Centre Occitanie Toulouse, France

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

12th ESEE conference
21th of June 2017

Session: Science-society contributions to sustainability transformation: Citizens Science, Community-Based Research, Participatory Action Research, Responsible Research and Innovation

AGENCE NATIONALE DE LA RECHERCHE

ANR

ANR-13-AGRO-0006

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

le cnam

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

EFTS
EDUCATION FORMATION
TRAVAIL SAVOIRS

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

SenS
Sciences en Société

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_16.png" /></figure>

# Agroecological transition: a challenge that requires new tools

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /></figure>

Multiple challenges
Conventional agriculture
<figure><img src="image_18.png" /></figure>

# Agroecological transition: a challenge that requires new tools

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /></figure>

Multiple challenges
Conventional agriculture

<figure><img src="image_20.png" /></figure>

Weak ecologization

Efficiency

<figure><img src="image_21.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_22.png" /></figure>

# Agroecological transition: a challenge that requires new tools

<figure><img src="image_23.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_24.png" /></figure>

Multiple challenges
Conventional agriculture

<figure><img src="image_25.png" /></figure>

Weak ecologization

<figure><img src="image_26.png" /></figure>

Weak ecologization

Substitution

Efficiency

<figure><img src="image_27.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_28.png" /></figure>

# Agroecological transition: a challenge that requires new tools

<figure><img src="image_29.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_30.png" /></figure>

?

Redesign

<figure><img src="image_31.png" /></figure>

Substitution

Strong ecologization

<figure><img src="image_32.png" /></figure>

Weak ecologization

<figure><img src="image_33.png" /></figure>

Weak ecologization

Efficiency

<figure><img src="image_34.png" /></figure>

Multiple challenges
Conventional agriculture

<figure><img src="image_35.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_36.png" /></figure>

# Agroecological transition: a challenge that requires new tools

<figure><img src="image_37.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_38.png" /></figure>

?

Redesign

<figure><img src="image_39.png" /></figure>

Substitution

<figure><img src="image_40.png" /></figure>

Strong ecologization

<figure><img src="image_41.png" /></figure>

Weak ecologization

<figure><img src="image_42.png" /></figure>

Weak ecologization

Efficiency

<figure><img src="image_43.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_44.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_45.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_46.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_47.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_48.png" /></figure>

Multiple challenges
Conventional agriculture
<figure><img src="image_49.png" /></figure>

# This presentation focuses on the participatory methods and tools design and application on 2 territories

<figure><img src="image_50.png" /></figure>

## Frameworks for agroecological transition

<figure><img src="image_51.png" /></figure>

## Methods and tools design

<figure><img src="image_52.png" /></figure>

## Results obtained
<figure><img src="image_53.png" /></figure>

# Conceptual framework: agroecological transition needs to consider various stakeholders and scales

<figure><img src="image_54.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_55.png" /></figure>

# Conceptual framework: agroecological transition needs to consider various stakeholders and scales

<figure><img src="image_56.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_57.png" /></figure>

# Conceptual framework: agroecological transition needs to consider various stakeholders and scales

Stakeholder system

CAHORS

Farm Resource
Management
System

<figure><img src="image_58.png" /></figure>

Territory Resource
Management System

<figure><img src="image_59.png" /></figure>

Supply Chain Resource
Management System

ALBI

MILLAU

0 10 20 30 km
<figure><img src="image_60.png" /></figure>

# Conceptual framework: agroecological transition needs to consider various stakeholders and scales

Stakeholder system

CAHORS

Farm Resource
Management
System

<figure><img src="image_61.png" /></figure>

Territory Resource
Management System

MILLAU

0 10 20 30 km
<figure><img src="image_62.png" /></figure>

Social and biological diversities and connectivities

Ecosystem services

<figure><img src="image_63.png" /></figure>

Step 1
Analysis

<figure><img src="image_64.png" /></figure>

Natural Resources

MR-
Farming Systems

Currently

Medium term

<figure><img src="image_65.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_66.png" /></figure>

# Agroecological transition in a 5-step iterative process

Step 2
Scenarios

scenarios

Social and biological diversities and connectivities

Ecosystem services

<figure><img src="image_67.png" /></figure>

Step 1

<figure><img src="image_68.png" /></figure>

Currently

Medium term

<figure><img src="image_69.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_70.png" /></figure>

# Agroecological transition in a 5-step iterative process

Social and biological diversities and connectivities

Ecosystem services

Step 2

scenarios

<figure><img src="image_71.png" /></figure>

MR-NR

MR-SC

MR-FS

Step 3
TAES design

Step 1

<figure><img src="image_72.png" /></figure>

Natural Resources

Farming Systems

Currently

Medium term

<figure><img src="image_73.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_74.png" /></figure>

# Agroecological transition in a 5-step iterative process

Social and biological diversities and connectivities

Ecosystem services

Step 2

scenarios

<figure><img src="image_75.png" /></figure>

TAES

MR-SC

MR-NR

Step 5
Gouvernance
Management

<figure><img src="image_76.png" /></figure>

Step 4

Backcasting

Step 3

MR-FS

Step 1

ASaT

<figure><img src="image_77.png" /></figure>

Farming Systems

Currently

Initiation of the innovation process: 1st step
of an iterative and cyclic process from step
2 to 5

Medium term

<figure><img src="image_78.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_79.png" /></figure>

42 pluridisciplinary researchers

<figure><img src="image_80.png" /></figure>

AGENCE NATIONALE DE LA RECHERCHE

ANR

<figure><img src="image_81.png" /></figure>

le cnam

<figure><img src="image_82.png" /></figure>

Dynafor

EFTS
EDUCATION FORMATION
TRAVAIL SAVOIR

<figure><img src="image_83.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_84.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_85.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_86.png" /></figure>

SenS
Sciences en Société

<figure><img src="image_87.png" /></figure>

+ Ergonomics + Sociology
<figure><img src="image_88.png" /></figure>

# Almost as many researchers as participants

42 pluridisciplinary researchers

<figure><img src="image_89.png" /></figure>

+ Ergonomics + Sociology

Selection

AGENCE NATIONALE DE LA RECHERCHE

ANR

<figure><img src="image_90.png" /></figure>

le cnam

<figure><img src="image_91.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_92.png" /></figure>

EFTS
EDUCATION FORMATION
TRAVAIL SAVOIR

<figure><img src="image_93.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_94.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_95.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_96.png" /></figure>

SenS
Sciences en Soutien

<figure><img src="image_97.png" /></figure>

Territory partners:

<figure><img src="image_98.png" /></figure>

Centre Ouest
Aveyron

Terre d'équilibre

<figure><img src="image_99.png" /></figure>

Pays Midi-Quercy

Pôle d'Equilibre Territorial Rural

<figure><img src="image_100.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_101.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_102.png" /></figure>

# Almost as many researchers as participants

## Selection

42 pluridisciplinary researchers

AGENCE NATIONALE DE LA RECHERCHE

ANR

<figure><img src="image_103.png" /></figure>

le cnam

<figure><img src="image_104.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_105.png" /></figure>

EFTS
EDUCATION FORMATION
TRAVAIL SAVORS

<figure><img src="image_106.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_107.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_108.png" /></figure>

MA
TOULOUSE

SenS
Sciences en Soutien

<figure><img src="image_109.png" /></figure>

+ Ergonomics + Sociology

<figure><img src="image_110.png" /></figure>

## Territory partners:

<figure><img src="image_111.png" /></figure>

Centre Ouest
Aveyron

Terre d'équilibre

Pays Midi-Quercy

Pôle d'Equilibre Territorial Rural

<figure><img src="image_112.png" /></figure>

Midi-Quercy

## Selection

<figure><img src="image_113.png" /></figure>

## Workshops' participants
<figure><img src="image_114.png" /></figure>

# Key individual stakeholders part of a global representativeness of local agricultural system

<figure><img src="image_115.png" /></figure>

## Stakeholder analysis

<table><thead><tr><th>Organisme</th><th>Agriculteurs</th><th>Fonction</th><th>Contact</th><th>Mail</th><th>Contact de</th><th>Tel</th><th>Adresse1</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ADEAR Tarn</td><td>Animalier</td><td></td><td>Rémi Gachenot</td><td>adear.tarn@free.fr</td><td>Etienne</td><td>05 63 51 03 70</td><td>ADEAR Maison des associations</td></tr><tr><td>ADEFPAT</td><td>Directrice</td><td></td><td>Anne Froment</td><td>anne.froment@adefpat.fr</td><td>Etienne</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Albigeois</td><td>Chef projet Plan Climat Territorial</td><td></td><td>Julien frat</td><td>jfrat@pays-albigeois-bastique.fr</td><td>Etienne</td><td>05.63.36.87.01</td><td>Pays de l'Albigeois et des Bas</td></tr><tr><td>APABA</td><td>président</td><td></td><td>Olivier Izard</td><td>olivierizard@hotmail.fr</td><td>Marc</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Bio82</td><td>animatrice</td><td></td><td>Virgil Bezin</td><td>techniquebio82@gmail.com</td><td>Guillaume</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CA12</td><td>Conseillers d'entreprise</td><td></td><td>Héloïse Gonzalo-Turpin</td><td>heloise.gonzalo-turpin@av</td><td>Marc</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CA12</td><td>conseiller élevage bio</td><td></td><td>Stéphane Doumayzel</td><td>stephane.doumayzel(at)av</td><td>Guillaume</td><td>05.65.73.77.13</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CA12</td><td>conseiller agronomie fourrages</td><td></td><td>Benoît Delmas</td><td>benoit.delmas(at)aveyron.i</td><td>Guillaume</td><td>05 65 71 37 00</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CA12</td><td>conseiller fourrages élevage</td><td></td><td>Jean-Bernard Mis</td><td>jb.mis@tarn.chambagri.fr</td><td>Guillaume</td><td>05.63.48.83.87</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CA81</td><td>Conseillère agronomie-environnement</td><td></td><td>Cécile Fraysse</td><td>c.fraysse@tarn.chambagri.fr</td><td>Etienne</td><td>05.63.48.83.83</td><td>Chambre d'agriculture du Tar</td></tr><tr><td>CA81</td><td>Conseillère agronomie-environnement</td><td></td><td>Antoine Delaunois</td><td>a.delaunois@tarn.chambagri.fr</td><td>Etienne</td><td>05.63.48.83.83</td><td>Chambre d'agriculture du Tar</td></tr><tr><td>CA82</td><td>Conseillère Grande Cultures conventionnel et bio</td><td></td><td>Ingrid Barrier</td><td>ingrid.barrier@agri82.fr</td><td>Etienne</td><td>05.63.65.07.11</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CA82</td><td>Conseillère installation bio</td><td></td><td>Marie Cabarès</td><td>marie.cabarès@agri82.fr</td><td>Etienne</td><td>05.63.63.09.95</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CA82</td><td>Représenté du pôle végétal</td><td></td><td>Didier Lafage</td><td></td><td></td><td>05.63.63.63.46</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"><strong>CFPPA Albi</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Cle 2 Sol</td><td>X</td><td>présidente</td><td>Sarah Singla</td><td>s.singla@laposte.net</td><td>Etienne, JP5</td><td>05.65.73.61.70</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CRAMP</td><td></td><td>Pôle économie et prospective</td><td>Nelly Grillet</td><td>nelly.grillet@mp.chambagri</td><td>Olivier, Etienne</td><td>05.61.75.75.81</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>FDUMA82</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>fédé pêche 12</td><td></td><td>Ingénieure</td><td>Martine Guilmet</td><td></td><td>Alexandre</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fermes de Figeac</td><td></td><td>Directeur</td><td>Dominique Olivier</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>GPLV</td><td></td><td>Animatrice (permanence le mardi)</td><td>benedicte canredon</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>565451957 06 75 12 22 55</td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"><strong>Lactalis</strong></td></tr><tr><td>PMQ</td><td></td><td>Chargé de</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>QUALISOL</td><td></td><td>Responsable</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Res'EauSol</td><td></td><td>président</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Res'EauSol</td><td></td><td>directrice</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ruthénois</td><td></td><td>directrice</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>SODIAL</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Sol et Eau</td><td>X</td><td>Président</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>UNICOR</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

## Workshops' participants:

* Farmers

* Farmer groups

* Civil society (consumers or environmental associations)

* Advisory groups

* Institutions

* Supply chain (cooperative, label)

<figure><img src="image_116.png" /></figure>

## Stakeholders data basis
<figure><img src="image_117.png" /></figure>

# An operationalization of the conceptual framework in 3+1 steps

<figure><img src="image_118.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_119.png" /></figure>

# An operationalization of the conceptual framework in 3+1 steps

<figure><img src="image_120.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_121.png" /></figure>

# 83+65 targets for an agroecological system in 2025 represented at different scales

## Workshop 2

<figure><img src="image_122.png" /></figure>

Step 3

* ↗ crop rotation's length

* spread calving time to optimize the use of mountain lands

* create common compost platform

* ↗ pilot farm to test innovations

* ↗ direct selling

* ↗ certification label to export

* ↗ wooded network

* ↘ urbanization dynamics

* ↗ soil cover

...
<figure><img src="image_123.png" /></figure>

# 83+65 targets for an agroecological system in 2025 represented at different scales

<figure><img src="image_124.png" /></figure>

## 5W1H -HRI

<figure><img src="image_125.png" /></figure>

## Multidimensional text analysis (IRAMUTEQ)

<figure><img src="image_126.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_127.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_128.png" /></figure>

## Target individual representation

<figure><img src="image_129.png" /></figure>

## Interdependency representation on yed

<figure><img src="image_130.png" /></figure>

## Target clustering

<figure><img src="image_131.png" /></figure>

## Rich picture

<figure><img src="image_132.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_133.png" /></figure>

Italy + North Africa

<figure><img src="image_134.png" /></figure>
# A diversity of methods and tools to go progressively into details on how to reach the targets

<figure><img src="image_135.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_136.png" /></figure>

## What did you already produced?

<figure><img src="image_137.png" /></figure>

Maintain and value the wooded landscape

<figure><img src="image_138.png" /></figure>

## Are there prioritary clusters?

<figure><img src="image_139.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_140.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_141.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_142.png" /></figure>

## How do you organize the targets in each cluster?

<figure><img src="image_143.png" /></figure>
tatabox

# A diversity of methods and tools to go progressively into details on how to reach the targets

<figure><img src="image_144.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_145.png" /></figure>

## What did you already produced?

<figure><img src="image_146.png" /></figure>

## Are there prioritary clusters?

<figure><img src="image_147.png" /></figure>

## How do you organize the targets in each cluster?

<figure><img src="image_148.png" /></figure>

## Which pathway to reach this target?

Governance
Chamber of
agriculture of
the
department 82
tatabox

# A diversity of methods and tools to go progressively into details on how to reach the targets

<figure><img src="image_149.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_150.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_151.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_152.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_153.png" /></figure>

## What did you already produced?

## Are there prioritary clusters?

<figure><img src="image_154.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_155.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_156.png" /></figure>

## How do you organize the targets in each cluster?

<figure><img src="image_157.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_158.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_159.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_160.png" /></figure>

## Which pathway to reach this target?

<figure><img src="image_161.png" /></figure>
tatabox

# A diversity of methods and tools to go progressively into details on how to reach the targets

<figure><img src="image_162.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_163.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_164.png" /></figure>

Maintain and value the wooded landscape

<figure><img src="image_165.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_166.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_167.png" /></figure>

## Icebreaker

<figure><img src="image_168.png" /></figure>

Initial state

47

Final state

<figure><img src="image_169.png" /></figure>

Target

connaissances

agriculteurs
écosystèmes

<figure><img src="image_170.png" /></figure>

1 formation

67

Initial state

<figure><img src="image_171.png" /></figure>

porteurs

de projets

collectifs

diversification

<figure><img src="image_172.png" /></figure>

Target
exemple noix:

¼ UTH

= 120 ha

10 exploitations

4

Final state

Initial state

170 producteurs

>50% broutard

vendus Italie +

Maghreb

<figure><img src="image_173.png" /></figure>

Target
Jeunes bovins

pour

restauration

collective

<figure><img src="image_174.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_175.png" /></figure>

47

67

Target
porteurs

<figure><img src="image_176.png" /></figure>

Target

de projets

collectifs

diversification

<figure><img src="image_177.png" /></figure>

exemple noix:

¼ UTH

= 120 ha

10 exploitations

Initial state

0 fo

Action

Organic
vegetable
production

training
course

Governance
Chamber of
agriculture of
the
department 82

Target

connaissances

<figure><img src="image_178.png" /></figure>

Final state

1 formation

Interm.

Goal

10% in

2020

Obstacle
outlet

Action

Creation of
a CSA
network

Resource

CSA

network of

the

department

82
tatabox

# A diversity of methods and tools to go progressively into details on how to reach the targets

<figure><img src="image_179.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_180.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_181.png" /></figure>

Maintain and value the wooded landscape

<figure><img src="image_182.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_183.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_184.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_185.png" /></figure>

4

Final state

Initial state

170 producteurs
>50% broutard
vendus Italie +
Maghreb

Target

Jeunes bovins

pour
restauration
collective

<figure><img src="image_186.png" /></figure>

47

Final state

Initial state

<figure><img src="image_187.png" /></figure>

Target
connaissances

agriculteurs
écosystèmes

<figure><img src="image_188.png" /></figure>

1 formation

Initial state

<figure><img src="image_189.png" /></figure>

Target
porteurs

de projets

collectifs

diversification

<figure><img src="image_190.png" /></figure>

67

Final state

exemple noix:

¼ UTH

= 120 ha

10 exploitations

<figure><img src="image_191.png" /></figure>

47

Final state

Target

connaissances

<figure><img src="image_192.png" /></figure>

1 formation

Initial state

0 fo

Action

Organic
vegetable
production
training
course

Obstacle
outlet

Interm.
Goal
10% in
2020

Action

Creation of
a CSA
network

Resource
CSA
network of
the
department
82

<figure><img src="image_193.png" /></figure>

67

Final state

exemple noix:

¼ UTH

= 120 ha

10 exploitations

<figure><img src="image_194.png" /></figure>

Target
porteurs
de projets
collectifs
diversification

Governance
Chamber of
agriculture of
the
department 82

Convergence
# Processing results to create useful tools for the territorial planning

<figure><img src="image_195.png" /></figure>
# In summary, we designed outputs for scientists and local stakeholder to move toward agroecology

## From theory to practice:

* Operational replicable method

* Validated by the local stakeholders

✔ Credible

✔ Salient

✔ Legitimate

<figure><img src="image_196.png" /></figure>

## Ready to use outputs for stakeholders

✔ Shared Diagnosis + Vision + Action plan

✔ Methodological guide

<figure><img src="image_197.png" /></figure>

## Prospects:

? Researcher position on long term processes

: design + implementation

? Polycentric governance/Step by step design

? Analysis learning process and position evolution

Questions?

<figure><img src="image_198.png" /></figure>

Step 5
Gouvernance
Management
<figure><img src="image_199.png" /></figure>

References

* Berg, T., & Pooley, R. (2013). *Rich Pictures: Collaborative Communication Through Icons*. *System Practice and Action Research*, 26(4), pp361-376.

* Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., ... Mitchell, R. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. In *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America* 100 (pp. 8086–8091).

* Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). *Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its Use, for Practitioners, Teachers and Students* (John Wiley).

* Duru, M., Therond, O., & Fares, M. (2015). Designing agroecological transitions; A review. *Agronomy for Sustainable Development*. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x

* Duru, M., Therond, O., Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Magne, M. A., Justes, E., ... Sarthou, J. P. (2015). How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a review. *Agronomy for Sustainable Development*, 35(4), 1259–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0306-1

* Grimble, R., & Wellard, K. (1997). Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. *Agricultural Systems*, 55(2). Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X97000061

* Hill, S. B., & MacRae, R. J. (1995). Conceptual framework for the transition from conventional to sustainable agriculture. *Journal of Sustainable Agriculture*, 7(1), 81–87.

* Horlings, L. G., & Marsden, T. K. (2011). Towards the real green revolution? Exploring the conceptual dimensions of a new ecological modernisation of agriculture that could “feed the world” *Global Environmental Change*, 21(2), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.004

* Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. *Biological Conservation*, 141(10), 2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014

* Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., ... Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. *Journal of Environmental Management*, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001

* Vinck, D. (2009). De l'objet intermédiaire à l'objet-frontière, Vers la prise en compte du travail d'équipement. *Revue D'anthropologie Des Connaissances*, 3(1), 51–72.

* Watson, R. T., Rosswall, T., Steiner, A., Töpfer, K., Arico, S., & Bridgewater, P. (2005). *Ecosystems and human well-being*. (R. T. Watson, T. Rosswall, A. Steiner, K. Töpfer, S. Arico, & P. Bridgewater, Eds.), *Ecosystems* (Vol. 5). World Resources Institute. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1439.003