# Circular Economy and Zero-Energy Factories: A Synergistic Approach to Sustainable Manufacturing

Nwamekwe Charles Onyeka, Nwabunwanne Emeka

► To cite this version:

Nwamekwe Charles Onyeka, Nwabunwanne Emeka. Circular Economy and Zero-Energy Factories: A Synergistic Approach to Sustainable Manufacturing. Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2025, 10 (1), pp.829 - 835. hal-04999687

HAL Id: hal-04999687

https://hal.science/hal-04999687v1

Submitted on 20 Mar 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Circular Economy and Zero-Energy Factories: A Synergistic Approach to Sustainable Manufacturing

¹Nwamekwe Charles Onyeka and ²Nwabunwanne Emeka Celestine

¹,²Industrial/Production Engineering Department,
Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P.M.B. 5025 Awka,
Anambra State - Nigeria

Email: co.nwamekwe@unizik.edu.ng

²ec.nwabunwanne@unizik.edu.ng

## Abstract

The global pursuit of sustainability in manufacturing has necessitated a shift toward innovative frameworks that integrate environmental stewardship with economic viability. This paper explores the intersection of the circular economy (CE) and zero-energy factories (ZEFs), presenting a synergistic approach to sustainable manufacturing. The circular economy emphasizes the minimization of waste and the continuous reuse of materials, while zero-energy factories aim to achieve net-zero energy consumption by harnessing renewable energy and optimizing energy efficiency. Through a comprehensive review of current practices, this study identifies key strategies for integrating CE principles with ZEF objectives, such as resource recovery, closed-loop supply chains, and smart energy systems.

The paper also highlights enabling technologies, including Internet of Things (IoT), digital twins, and advanced manufacturing systems, as critical to operationalizing this synergy. Case studies of successful implementations in diverse industries illustrate the environmental and economic benefits, including reduced carbon footprints, cost savings, and enhanced resource resilience. The findings underscore the potential of aligning CE and ZEF principles to create a paradigm shift in manufacturing, driving innovation and sustainability simultaneously. This research concludes with a roadmap for policymakers, manufacturers, and stakeholders to collaboratively adopt and scale such integrated models, fostering sustainable industrial transformation.

**Key Words** - Circular Economy, Zero-Energy Factories, Sustainable Manufacturing, Closed-Loop Systems, Energy Efficiency, Smart Technologies, Waste Reduction.

## 1. Introduction

### 1.1 Background

The rapid industrialization has led to significant environmental challenges, primarily due to manufacturing's substantial contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and resource depletion. As industries seek to mitigate these impacts, innovative strategies such as the Circular Economy (CE) and Zero-Energy Factories (ZEF) have emerged. These frameworks emphasize resource efficiency and energy conservation, aligning with global sustainability goals [1].

Research indicates that adopting sustainable manufacturing practices can significantly reduce energy consumption and waste generation [2][3][4]. For instance, the implementation of cleaner production strategies has been shown to lower emissions and enhance resource utilization [2][4]. Furthermore, advancements in technologies such as Cyber-Physical Systems and Industry 4.0 are facilitating real-time energy monitoring

and optimization, thereby promoting energy efficiency in manufacturing processes [5].

The principles of CE focus on minimizing waste and maximizing resource efficiency through practices such as recycling, reusing, and reducing material consumption [6]. CE promotes closed-loop systems that conserve resources and mitigate environmental impacts. In contrast, ZEF emphasizes achieving net-zero energy consumption by balancing energy usage with renewable energy generation. This alignment of goals presents a unique opportunity for manufacturers to adopt practices that enhance sustainability while also improving operational efficiency. The benefits of integrating CE and ZEF are manifold. By adopting CE practices, manufacturers can significantly reduce their energy consumption, thereby supporting the energy efficiency goals of ZEF [7]. For instance, implementing recycling processes can lower the energy required for producing new materials, which is crucial for achieving energy neutrality in manufacturing operations. Conversely, the energy efficiency of ZEF can facilitate the effective implementation of CE by reducing the carbon footprint associated with resource recycling and reuse processes.
However, several challenges must be addressed to fully
realize the potential of integrating CE and ZEF. These
include technological limitations, high initial investment
costs, and the need for supportive regulatory frameworks.
Future research should focus on lifecycle analyses of
combined systems, cross-sector collaboration, and the
economic feasibility of large-scale implementation to
better understand the implications of this integration [8].

**1.2. Research Objectives**

The objective of this review is to explore the synergy
between CE and ZEF principles, highlighting their core
concepts, benefits, and challenges. By analysing their
intersection, this paper aims to demonstrate how
integrating these concepts can revolutionize
manufacturing and create pathways for sustainable
development.

**1.3. Structure of the Review**

The paper begins with an overview of CE in
manufacturing, followed by an examination of ZEF
principles. It then explores the synergies between CE and
ZEF, discusses future research directions, and concludes
by summarizing the key findings.

**2. Circular Economy in Manufacturing**

**2.1 Principles of Circular Economy**

The CE framework is fundamentally anchored in the
principles of Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle (3Rs), which
collectively promote closed-loop systems aimed at
minimizing waste and resource extraction. This paradigm
shifts from traditional linear models—characterized by
the "take-make-dispose" approach—to sustainable
circular models is essential for enhancing material
efficiency throughout the product lifecycle [9][10]. By
prioritizing the optimization of resources, CE encourages
industries to rethink their operational strategies, thereby
fostering a more sustainable economic environment [11].
Material efficiency is a cornerstone of CE, emphasizing
the importance of maximizing the utility of resources
while minimizing environmental impact. Research
indicates that organizations adopting CE principles can
achieve significant reductions in waste and resource
consumption, ultimately contributing to economic growth
and environmental sustainability [12]. Furthermore,
stakeholder engagement is critical in facilitating the
transition to CE, as it ensures that diverse perspectives are
integrated into the development and implementation of
circular practices [13].

**2.2 Benefits of CE in Manufacturing**

The adoption of CE practices in manufacturing yields
numerous benefits, including reduced waste, lower
production costs, and enhanced resource conservation. By
transitioning to a CE model, industries can significantly
minimize their dependency on raw materials, which not
only lowers operational costs but also mitigates
environmental impacts associated with resource extraction.
This shift towards resource efficiency is crucial, as it
allows manufacturers to optimize their processes and
reduce material waste throughout the product lifecycle
[14].

Moreover, CE fosters innovation by encouraging the
design of sustainable products and systems. This
innovation is essential for manufacturers aiming to remain
competitive in an increasingly eco-conscious market while
complying with stringent environmental regulations [15].
Research indicates that integrating CE principles with
Industry 4.0 technologies can further enhance
sustainability performance, enabling firms to leverage
digital tools for better resource management and
operational efficiency [16].

**2.3. Challenges in Implementing CE**

Despite the numerous advantages associated with the CE,
its implementation faces significant challenges that hinder
widespread adoption. One of the primary obstacles is the
technological limitations inherent in recycling and reuse
processes. Current recycling technologies may not be
sufficiently advanced to handle the complexity of materials
used in modern products, leading to inefficiencies and
increased costs [9]. Additionally, the high upfront costs
associated with transitioning to circular systems can deter
companies from investing in necessary infrastructure and
technologies.

Moreover, the lack of comprehensive policies and
incentives further complicates the transition to CE.
Without supportive regulatory frameworks, businesses
may lack the motivation to adopt circular practices, as they
may perceive them as financially burdensome rather than
beneficial [17]. Furthermore, effective implementation of
CE requires extensive collaboration across supply chains,
which can be challenging due to varying interests and
levels of commitment among stakeholders [18]. This
complexity necessitates a coordinated approach to ensure
that all parties are aligned in their efforts to promote
sustainability and resource efficiency.

**3. ZERO-ENERGY FACTORIES (ZEF)**

**3.1. Concept and Design Principles**

ZEF represent a transformative approach to manufacturing,
characterized by their operation with net-zero energy
consumption. This is achieved by balancing energy usage
with renewable energy generation, thereby minimizing reliance on non-renewable energy sources. The core principles of ZEF include energy efficiency, the integration of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind, and the implementation of smart technologies for effective energy management [19].

Designing ZEF involves incorporating advanced insulation materials and energy recovery systems to minimize energy loss. For instance, the use of composite panels with high thermal insulation properties can significantly reduce heat infiltration, thus enhancing overall energy efficiency. Additionally, the application of innovative materials, such as silica aerogels, has been shown to provide superior thermal insulation, making them ideal for ZEF applications.

Furthermore, smart technologies play a crucial role in the management of energy flows within ZEF. These technologies enable real-time monitoring and optimization of energy consumption, facilitating the efficient use of renewable energy sources [20]. By integrating these principles and technologies, ZEF not only contributes to sustainability goals but also enhances operational efficiency and reduces long-term operational costs.

## 3.2. Case Studies of ZEF

Leading manufacturers such as Siemens and Tesla have pioneered the implementation of ZEF practices, establishing facilities that operate with net-zero energy consumption. These factories achieve energy neutrality by balancing energy usage with renewable energy generation, primarily through the integration of solar and wind energy systems. For example, Tesla's Gigafactory in Nevada is designed to be powered primarily by renewable energy, utilizing extensive solar panels and energy storage systems to meet its operational energy demands.

The design principles of ZEF emphasize energy efficiency and the use of advanced energy management systems. Siemens has implemented smart technologies that monitor and optimize energy consumption in real-time, significantly enhancing operational efficiency. Such systems not only reduce energy costs but also minimize the environmental impact of manufacturing processes. Additionally, ZEF designs often incorporate energy recovery systems and advanced insulation techniques to further reduce energy loss, ensuring that the facilities can operate sustainably while maintaining high productivity levels.

These case studies of Siemens and Tesla not only demonstrate the feasibility of ZEF practices but also set benchmarks for sustainable industrial operations. By showcasing the successful integration of renewable energy and smart technologies, these manufacturers are

leading the way in the transition towards more sustainable manufacturing practices.

## 3.3. Barriers to Achieving ZEF

Achieving ZEF presents several barriers that hinder widespread adoption, despite the potential benefits of such systems. One of the most significant challenges is the high initial investment required for renewable energy systems and energy-efficient infrastructure. The upfront costs associated with installing solar panels, wind turbines, and advanced energy management systems can be prohibitive for many manufacturers, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises [21]. This financial barrier often leads to hesitation in transitioning to ZEF models, as companies may prioritize short-term financial returns over long-term sustainability goals.

Technological challenges also play a crucial role in limiting the adoption of ZEF. For instance, inefficiencies in energy storage technologies can impede the effective utilization of renewable energy sources. Current battery technologies may not provide adequate storage capacity or efficiency, leading to energy losses that undermine the benefits of renewable energy generation [22]. Furthermore, the intermittent nature of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, necessitates reliable energy storage solutions to ensure a consistent energy supply, which is still a developing area in many regions [23].

Additionally, the lack of supportive regulations and incentives further complicates the transition to ZEF. In many jurisdictions, regulatory frameworks do not adequately support the integration of renewable energy technologies or provide sufficient incentives for manufacturers to invest in ZEF practices. Without a conducive policy environment, companies may be reluctant to invest in the necessary infrastructure to achieve energy neutrality.

# 4 SYNERGIES BETWEEN CIRCULAR ECONOMY AND ZERO-ENERGY FACTORIES

## 4.1 Integration of CE and ZEF Principles

The integration of CE and ZEF principles presents a synergistic approach to sustainable manufacturing, aligning waste reduction and resource optimization with energy efficiency goals. CE practices, which focus on minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization, can significantly reduce energy consumption within ZEF frameworks. For instance, by implementing strategies such as material recovery and recycling, manufacturers can decrease the energy required for producing new materials, thereby enhancing the overall energy efficiency
of their operations [24].

Conversely, the energy efficiency inherent in ZEF supports CE objectives by lowering the carbon footprint associated with resource recycling and reuse processes. ZEF facilities, which utilize renewable energy sources like solar and wind, not only achieve energy neutrality but also contribute to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions during the recycling and reuse phases of product life cycles. This dual benefit underscores the importance of integrating renewable energy systems and energy-efficient technologies in manufacturing processes.

Moreover, the application of advanced energy management systems in ZEF can facilitate real-time monitoring and optimization of energy flows, further enhancing resource efficiency. By adopting a holistic approach that combines CE and ZEF principles, manufacturers can create a more sustainable industrial ecosystem that not only meets regulatory requirements but also drives innovation and competitiveness in the market [25].

## 4.2. Technological Innovations Enabling Synergy

Technological innovations such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Digital Twins (DTs) are pivotal in enabling the synergy between CE and ZEF principles. These technologies facilitate real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and optimization of manufacturing processes, thereby enhancing both resource and energy efficiency.

The IoT plays a crucial role in creating interconnected systems that allow for continuous data collection and analysis. By integrating IoT devices within manufacturing environments, companies can monitor energy consumption patterns and resource usage in real-time, leading to more informed decision-making [26]. For instance, IoT sensors can detect inefficiencies in energy use, prompting immediate adjustments that align with both CE and ZEF objectives.

Artificial Intelligence further amplifies these capabilities by providing advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms that can predict future energy needs and optimize resource allocation. AI can analyse vast datasets to identify trends and anomalies, enabling manufacturers to implement proactive measures that reduce waste and enhance energy efficiency [27]. For example, AI-driven predictive maintenance can minimize downtime and ensure that machinery operates at peak efficiency, directly supporting ZEF goals.

Digital Twins, which create virtual replicas of physical systems, allow manufacturers to simulate and optimize processes before implementation. This technology enables the testing of various scenarios to determine the

most efficient use of resources and energy, thereby facilitating the integration of CE and ZEF principles [28]. By employing Digital Twins, manufacturers can visualize the impact of different operational strategies on energy consumption and resource utilization, leading to more sustainable practices.

## 4.2 Case Studies of Combined Implementation

Manufacturers such as BMW have successfully integrated CE and ZEF principles, demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of combining these approaches to achieve sustainable manufacturing. BMW's commitment to sustainability is evident in its use of renewable energy sources to power its facilities, which aligns with ZEF objectives of achieving net-zero energy consumption [29]. By harnessing solar and wind energy, BMW not only reduces its carbon footprint but also enhances energy efficiency across its manufacturing processes [30].

In addition to renewable energy utilization, BMW has adopted closed-loop systems for material recycling, a core tenet of CE. This approach minimizes waste by ensuring that materials are reused and recycled within the production cycle, thereby reducing the demand for virgin resources [23]. For example, BMW's recycling initiatives include the recovery of aluminium and plastics from end-of-life vehicles, which are then reintegrated into the manufacturing process. This closed-loop system not only conserves resources but also significantly lowers energy consumption associated with material extraction and processing.

The integration of CE and ZEF principles at BMW serves as a benchmark for the automotive industry, showcasing how sustainable practices can lead to operational efficiencies and cost savings. By investing in renewable energy technologies and implementing circular practices, BMW has positioned itself as a leader in sustainable manufacturing, setting a precedent for other manufacturers to follow [22]. This case study illustrates the potential for manufacturers to achieve significant environmental and economic benefits through the combined implementation of CE and ZEF principles.

# 5. Future Directions

## 5.1 Research Gaps

While the principles of CE and ZEF have been extensively studied, their integration remains underexplored, presenting significant research gaps. Future investigations should prioritize lifecycle analysis of combined systems to understand the environmental impacts and resource efficiencies that arise from their
integration. Such analyses can provide insights into how
CE practices can enhance the energy efficiency of ZEFs
and vice versa, ultimately contributing to more
sustainable manufacturing processes.

Additionally, cross-sector collaboration is essential for the successful implementation of CE and ZEF principles. Research should explore how different industries can share best practices and technologies to facilitate the transition towards sustainable manufacturing. For instance, the automotive sector's experience with ZEF could inform the construction industry on energy-efficient practices, while the materials sector could provide insights into effective recycling methods that support CE.

Moreover, the economic feasibility of large-scale implementation of integrated CE and ZEF systems warrants further examination. Understanding the financial implications, including initial investments and long-term savings, is crucial for encouraging manufacturers to adopt these practices. Studies should assess the cost-benefit ratios of implementing renewable energy systems alongside closed-loop material processes, providing a clearer picture of the economic viability of such transitions.

## 5.2 Policy and Regulatory Recommendations

To effectively promote the adoption of CE and ZEF principles, governments and regulatory bodies must develop comprehensive policies that incentivize these sustainable practices. Such policies can include tax breaks for investments in renewable energy, subsidies for advanced recycling technologies, and stricter regulations on waste management and emissions. These measures are crucial for facilitating the transition towards a more sustainable industrial landscape.

Tax incentives for renewable energy investments can significantly lower the financial barriers that manufacturers face when transitioning to ZEF. By providing tax breaks, governments can encourage companies to invest in solar panels, wind turbines, and other renewable energy sources, thus promoting energy independence and sustainability [5]. For instance, countries that have implemented such tax incentives have seen a marked increase in renewable energy adoption among manufacturers, leading to reduced operational costs and enhanced energy efficiency.

Subsidies for recycling technologies are equally important. These financial supports can help offset the costs associated with developing and implementing advanced recycling processes, which are essential for achieving the closed-loop systems central to CE [31]. By investing in innovative recycling technologies, manufacturers can improve their resource recovery rates

and reduce waste, aligning with both CE and ZEF objectives [32]. Moreover, stricter regulations on waste and emissions can compel industries to adopt more sustainable practices, ensuring compliance with environmental standards and promoting accountability.

## 5.3 Emerging Trends

Emerging technologies such as blockchain and edge computing are poised to significantly enhance the synergy between CE and ZEF principles, offering innovative solutions for sustainable manufacturing. Blockchain technology, known for its ability to provide transparent and immutable records, can facilitate traceability in supply chains, thereby promoting responsible sourcing and resource management [33]. By ensuring that materials are sourced sustainably and that waste is minimized, blockchain can support the closed-loop systems central to CE while also enhancing the energy efficiency of ZEF by optimizing resource flows.

Edge computing, on the other hand, enables decentralized energy management by processing data closer to the source of generation. This technology allows for real-time monitoring and control of energy consumption in manufacturing processes, which is crucial for achieving the energy neutrality goals of ZEF. By leveraging edge computing, manufacturers can optimize energy usage dynamically, reducing reliance on centralized energy systems and enhancing the overall sustainability of their operations [15].

Furthermore, the integration of these technologies within the frameworks of CE and ZEF warrants further investigation. Research should focus on how blockchain can be utilized to enhance the efficiency of recycling processes and resource recovery, while edge computing can improve energy management strategies in real-time [34]. Understanding the interplay between these technologies and their collective impact on sustainable manufacturing practices will be essential for developing robust frameworks that facilitate the transition towards a more sustainable industrial ecosystem.

## 6. Conclusion

The integration of CE principles with the ZEF model represents a groundbreaking shift toward sustainable manufacturing. This synergy fosters a closed-loop production system, where resource efficiency and renewable energy utilization work in tandem to minimize waste, reduce emissions, and optimize energy consumption. By adopting this combined approach, industries can achieve a dual objective: significantly reducing their environmental footprint while enhancing economic viability through cost-effective resource and
energy management strategies.

Despite its transformative potential, the widespread implementation of CE-ZEF frameworks faces notable challenges, including technological limitations, high initial capital investments, and a lack of comprehensive policy incentives. However, advancements in smart technologies—such as IoT, Artificial Intelligence, and Blockchain—can overcome these barriers by enabling real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and transparent resource tracking. Moreover, the establishment of supportive government policies, industry partnerships, and global sustainability commitments can drive the transition from traditional manufacturing paradigms to more sustainable alternatives.

This synergistic approach does not merely address the pressing challenges of climate change and resource depletion; it redefines manufacturing as a catalyst for global sustainability. By fostering innovation and resilience, Circular Economy and Zero-Energy Factories position industries as key contributors to a greener, more sustainable future, ensuring long-term ecological balance and economic growth.

## Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the efforts of the management of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Akwa in stimulating this research.

## References

[1]. M. Moktadir, T. Rahman, H. Rahman, S. Ali, & S. Paul, "Drivers to sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy: a perspective of leather industries in Bangladesh," *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 174, 2018, 1366-1380.

[2]. M. Isa & M. Najamuddin, "Carbon emission reduction strategies through cleaner production at coconut milk processing plant," *Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences*, 90(1), 2021, 146-153.

[3]. D. Sharma, "Strategies for assessment and implementation of sustainable manufacturing," *Journal of Engineering Research*, 2021.

[4]. R. Rahim, A. Raman, R. Shah, & K. Chiong, "A methodology for identifying cleaner production options to reduce carbon emission in the manufacturing industry," *Research Communication in Engineering Science and Technology*, 4, 2020, 24-37.

[5]. P. Dias, M. Cenci, A. Bernardes, & N. Huda, "What drives WEEE recycling? A comparative study concerning legislation, collection and recycling," *Waste Management and Research the Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy*, 40(10), 2022, 1527-1538.

[6]. M. Burykina, T. Danilova, T. Лапыко, V. Камынин, & A. Tonkikh, "The educational process in the aspect of the study of circular economy," *SHS Web of Conferences*, 172, 2023, 01027.

[7]. S. Bawono, "Circular economy role in industry and environmental sustainability: qualitative content analysis approach," *Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education*, 5(3), 2022, 1-13.

[8]. P. Chen, "The spatial impacts of the circular economy on carbon intensity - new evidence from the super-efficient SBM-DEA model," *Energy and Environment*, 35(1), 2022, 47-63.

[9]. J. Kirchherr, L. Piscicelli, R. Bour, E. Kostense-Smit, J. Muller, A. Huibrechtse-Truijens, et al., "Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU)," *Ecological Economics*, 150, 2018, 264-272.

[10]. N. Solomon, "Circular economy principles and their integration into global supply chain strategies," *Finance and Accounting Research Journal*, 6(5), 2024, 747-762.

[11]. C. Baah, E. Afum, Y. Agyabeng-Mensah, & D. Agyeman, "Stakeholder influence on adoption of circular economy principles: measuring implications for satisfaction and green legitimacy," *Circular Economy and Sustainability*, 2(1), 2021, 91-111.

[12]. M. Hina, C. Chauhan, R. Sharma, & A. Dhir, "Circular economy business models as pillars of sustainability: where are we now, and where are we heading?" *Business Strategy and the Environment*, 32(8), 2023, 6182-6209.

[13]. N. Obiuto, "Implementing circular economy principles to enhance safety and environmental sustainability in manufacturing," *IJAMRS*, 4(2), 2024, 22-29.

[14]. A. Supanut, "Circular economy strategies in practice: a qualitative examination of industry adaptation and innovation," *Revista De Gestão Social e Ambiental*, 18(3), 2024, e06723.

[15]. A. Ghaithan, Y. Alshammakhi, A. Mohammed, & K. Mazher, "Integrated impact of circular economy, industry 4.0, and lean manufacturing on sustainability performance of manufacturing firms," *International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health*, 20(6), 2023, 5119.

[16]. C. O. Nwamekwe, N. V. Ewuzie, N. C. Igbokwe, C. C. Okpala, & C. M. U-Dominic, "Sustainable manufacturing practices in Nigeria: optimization and implementation appraisal," *Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences*, 9(3), 2024.
[17]. O. Romero-Hernández & S. Romero, "Maximizing the value of waste: from waste management to the circular economy," Thunderbird International Business Review, 60(5), 2018, 757-764.

[18]. M. Linder, S. Sarasini, & P. Loon, "A metric for quantifying product-level circularity," *Journal of Industrial Ecology*, 21(3), 2017, 545-558.

[19]. C. O. Nwamekwe, N. V. Ewuzie, N. C. Igbokwe, C. M. U-Dominic, & C. V. Nwabueze, "Adoption of smart factories in Nigeria: problems, obstacles, remedies, and opportunities," *International Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering*, 2(2), 2024.

[20]. A. Hidayatulloh, "Eco-friendly methods of silica extraction from pyrophyllite rocks using sol-gel versus alkali fusion method," *E3S Web of Conferences*, 481, 2024, 05001.

[21]. A. Namin, M. Eckelman, & J. Isaacs, "Technical feasibility of powering U.S. manufacturing with rooftop solar PV," *Environmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability*, 3(1), 2023, 011002.

[22]. M. Jabeur, "Sustainable production scheduling with on-site intermittent renewable energy and demand-side management: a feed-animal case study," *Energies*, 16(14), 2023, 5433.

[23]. S. Jena & C. Behera, "Modelling sustainable supply chain process considering cost-sharing and stock-dependence demand under uncertain environment," 2022.

[24]. P. Gabrielli, "Optimal combination of net-zero pathways for minimum energy, land, and water consumption in chemical production," *Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research*, 63(31), 2024, 13929-13942.

[25]. G. Budak, X. Chen, S. Çelik, & B. Öztürk, "A systematic approach for assessment of renewable energy using analytic hierarchy process," *Energy Sustainability and Society*, 9(1), 2019.

[26]. P. Wang, Y. Zhong, & Z. Yao, "Modelling and estimation of CO2 emissions in China based on artificial intelligence," *Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience*, 2022, 1-14.

[27]. M. Orooje & M. Latifi, "A review of embedding artificial intelligence in internet of things and building information modelling for healthcare facility maintenance management," *Energy and Environment Research*, 11(2), 2021, 31.

[28]. C. Klemt, A. Uzosike, M. Harvey, S. Laurencin, Y. Habibi, & Y. Kwon, "Neural network models accurately predict discharge disposition after revision total knee arthroplasty," *Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy*, 30(8), 2021, 2591-259.

[29]. I. Maji & M. Saari, "Renewable energy consumption and sectoral based output," *International Journal of Finance Research*, 2(3), 2021, 143-153.

[30]. K. Rafi, "The impact of various renewable energy sources to reduce the case of resource scarcity in the global business market area," *Technoarete Transactions on Renewable Energy Green Energy and Sustainability*, 2(1), 2022.

[31]. Y. Gong, S. Xie, D. Arunachalam, J. Duan, & J. Luo, "Blockchain-based recycling and its impact on recycling performance: a network theory perspective," *Business Strategy and the Environment*, 31(8), 2022, 3717-3741.

[32]. S. Xie, Y. Gong, M. Kunc, Z. Wen, & S. Brown, "The application of blockchain technology in the recycling chain: a state-of-the-art literature review and conceptual framework," *International Journal of Production Research*, 61(24), 2022, 8692-8718.

[33]. A. Khanfar, M. Iranmanesh, M. Ghobakhloo, M. Senali, & M. Fathi, "Applications of blockchain technology in sustainable manufacturing and supply chain management: a systematic review," *Sustainability*, 13(14), 2021, 7870.

[34]. A. Jamwal, R. Agrawal, & M. Sharma, "A framework to overcome blockchain enabled sustainable manufacturing issues through circular economy and industry 4.0 measures," *International Journal of Mathematical Engineering and Management Sciences*, 7(6), 2022, 764-90.
https://doi.org/10.33889/ijmems.2022.7.6.05