# Correction to: Quantitative trait loci for resistance to Flavobacterium psychrophilum in rainbow trout: effect of the mode of infection and evidence of epistatic interactions

Clémence Fraslin, Nicolas Dechamp, Maria Bernard, Francine Krieg, Caroline Hervet, René Guyomard, Diane Esquerré, Johanna Barbieri, Claire Kuchly, Éric Duchaud, et al.

► To cite this version:

Clémence Fraslin, Nicolas Dechamp, Maria Bernard, Francine Krieg, Caroline Hervet, et al. Correction to: Quantitative trait loci for resistance to Flavobacterium psychrophilum in rainbow trout: effect of the mode of infection and evidence of epistatic interactions. Food Policy, 2019, 51, Non paginé. 10.1186/s12711-019-0451-0. hal-02618168

HAL Id: hal-02618168

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02618168

Submitted on 25 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
CORRECTION

Open Access

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for
updates

# Correction to: Quantitative trait loci for resistance to *Flavobacterium psychrophilum* in rainbow trout: effect of the mode of infection and evidence of epistatic interactions

Clémence Fraslin¹,², Nicolas Dechamp¹, Maria Bernard³, Francine Krieg¹, Caroline Hervet¹,⁶, René Guyomard¹, Diane Esquerré⁴, Johanna Barbieri⁴, Claire Kuchly⁴, Eric Duchaud⁵, Pierre Boudinot⁵, Tatiana Rochat⁵, Jean-François Bernardet⁵ and Edwige Quillet¹*

**Correction to: Fraslin et al. Genet Sel Evol (2018) 50:60**
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0431-9](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0431-9)

After publication of this work [1], we noted that there
was an error in Table 3 Line 4: $^bOmy2_{Omy3}$ should be
$^bOmy21_{Omy3}$.

The correct Table 3 is included here.

<footnote>*Correspondence: edwige.quillet@inra.fr
¹GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article</footnote>
<table><caption>Table 3 Results of QTL analysis using the model M2 for resistance trait following injection or immersion challenges</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Infection route</th><th rowspan="2">QTL</th><th rowspan="2">LRTmax</th><th rowspan="2">Position (cM)</th><th rowspan="2">CI (95%)</th><th colspan="2">Increase in survival rate</th><th colspan="2">Resistance origin</th><th rowspan="2">P value fixed effect</th><th rowspan="2">P value interaction</th></tr><tr><th>Fixed_R (%)</th><th>Fixed_S (%)</th><th>Fixed_R</th><th>Fixed_S</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2">IMMERSION</td><td>Omy17<sub>Omy3</sub></td><td>13.97*</td><td>61</td><td>0–92</td><td>38</td><td>7</td><td>AP2</td><td>AP2</td><td>***</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Omy25a<sub>Omy3</sub></td><td>10.41*</td><td>4</td><td>0–35</td><td>10</td><td>18</td><td>B57</td><td>B57</td><td>***</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td colspan="11">Type 1 interaction</td></tr><tr><td>INJECTION</td><td><sup>a</sup>Omy3<sub>Omy29</sub></td><td>15.27**</td><td>89</td><td>46–105</td><td>16</td><td>47</td><td>AP2</td><td>AP2</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">IMMERSION</td><td><sup>b</sup>Omy21<sub>Omy3</sub></td><td>15.35**</td><td>97</td><td>63–104</td><td>4</td><td>39</td><td>B57</td><td>B57</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td><sup>b</sup>Omy3<sub>Omy21</sub></td><td>40.73***</td><td>87</td><td>82–93</td><td>20</td><td>55</td><td>AP2</td><td>AP2</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td><sup>c</sup>Omy3<sub>Omy2</sub></td><td>35.66***</td><td>87</td><td>81–94</td><td>17</td><td>44</td><td>AP2</td><td>AP2</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>Omy29.2<sub>Omy3</sub></td><td>14.85*</td><td>23</td><td>8–49</td><td>5</td><td>48</td><td>B57</td><td>AP2</td><td>***</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">IMMERSION</td><td>Omy17<sub>Omy25a</sub></td><td>15.85**</td><td>73</td><td>53–79</td><td>11</td><td>53</td><td>AP2</td><td>B57</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>Omy7.2<sub>Omy21</sub></td><td>11.48*</td><td>7</td><td>0–103</td><td>5</td><td>31</td><td>AP2</td><td>B57</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td colspan="11">Type 2 interaction</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">INJECTION</td><td><sup>d</sup>Omy25a<sub>Omy3</sub></td><td>25.49***</td><td>14</td><td>10–18</td><td>53</td><td>16</td><td>B57</td><td>B57</td><td>***</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td><sup>d</sup>Omy3<sub>Omy25a</sub></td><td>35.35***</td><td>89</td><td>86–92</td><td>59</td><td>22</td><td>AP2</td><td>AP2</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>Omy26<sub>Omy29</sub></td><td>11.75*</td><td>18</td><td>0–34</td><td>30</td><td>26</td><td>AP2</td><td>AP2</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">INJECTION</td><td>Omy17<sub>Omy29</sub></td><td>18.29***</td><td>74</td><td>58–92</td><td>47</td><td>11</td><td>AP2</td><td>B57</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>Omy24<sub>Omy2</sub></td><td>12.71*</td><td>4</td><td>0–19</td><td>20</td><td>1</td><td>B57</td><td>AP2</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td colspan="11">Type 3 interaction</td></tr><tr><td>IMMERSION</td><td>Omy7.1<sub>Omy2</sub></td><td>16.42**</td><td>61</td><td>32–87</td><td>19</td><td>19</td><td>B57</td><td>AP2</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr></tbody></table>

The table presents chromosome-wide or genome-wide significant QTL detected for STATUS using model M2; Reciprocal interactions could be tested only for QTL detected in the first STATUS analysis (model M1); LRTmax = maximum of likelihood ratio test; Position in the genetic map in centimorgans (cM); CI = confidence interval; Chromosome-wide significant = *P ≤ 0.01; Genome-wide significant = **P ≤ 0.05 or ***P ≤ 0.01; P values for fixed effect and interaction corrected with Benjamini-Hochberg method: Non-significant = NS; *P value ≤ 0.05; ***P value ≤ 0.01

a The reciprocal interaction could not be tested as a new QTL (Omy29.2<sub>Omy3</sub>-QTL) was detected with the reciprocal model

b,d Reciprocal models for QTL pairs

c The QTL in the reciprocal model (Omy2<sub>Omy3</sub>-QTL) was only suggestive (P ≤ 0.05) at the chromosome-wide level

Author details

¹ GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France. ² SYSAAF Section Aquacole, Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 Rennes, France. ³ GABI, SIGENAE, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France. ⁴ GeT-PlaGe, Genotoul, INRA US1426, 31320 Casteanet-Tolosan Cedex, France. ⁵ Virologie et Immunologie Moléculaires, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France. ⁶ Present Address: BIOEPAR, INRA, Oniris, Université Bretagne Loire, 44307 Nantes, France.

The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0431-9.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Received: 20 February 2019 Accepted: 20 February 2019

Published online: 20 March 2019

Reference

1. Fraslin C, et al. Quantitative trait loci for resistance to *Flavobacterium psychrophilum* in rainbow trout: effect of the mode of infection and evidence of epistatic interactions. *Genet Sel Evol.* 2018;50:60.