# Association of Amlodipine with the Risk of In-Hospital Death in Patients with COVID-19 and Hypertension: A Reanalysis on 184 COVID-19 Patients with Hypertension

Gwenole Loas, Philippe van de Borne, Gil Darquennes, Pascal Le Corre

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Gwenole Loas, Philippe van de Borne, Gil Darquennes, Pascal Le Corre. Association of Amlodipine with the Risk of In-Hospital Death in Patients with COVID-19 and Hypertension: A Reanalysis on 184 COVID-19 Patients with Hypertension. Pharmaceuticals, 2022, 15 (3), pp.380. 10.3390/ph15030380. hal-03664666

HAL Id: hal-03664666

https://hal.science/hal-03664666

Submitted on 11 May 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Article

# Association of Amlodipine with the Risk of In-Hospital Death in Patients with COVID-19 and Hypertension: A Reanalysis on 184 COVID-19 Patients with Hypertension

Gwenolé Loas <fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />,* , Philippe Van de Borne <fnref n="3" />, Gil Darquennes <fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" /> and Pascal Le Corre <fnref n="4" />,<fnref n="5" />,<fnref n="6" />

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Loas, G.; Van de Borne, P.; Darquennes, G.; Le Corre, P. Association of Amlodipine with the Risk of In-Hospital Death in Patients with COVID-19 and Hypertension: A Reanalysis on 184 COVID-19 Patients with Hypertension. *Pharmaceuticals* **2022**, *15*, 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15030380

Academic Editor: Juan Carlos Saiz

Received: 7 March 2022

Accepted: 18 March 2022

Published: 21 March 2022

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

**Abstract:** Association between calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase (FIASMAs) use and decreased mortality in people with COVID-19 has been reported in recent studies. Since amlodipine is both a CCB and a FIASMA, the aim of this study was to investigate the association between chronic amlodipine use and the survival of people with hypertension infected with COVID-19. This retrospective cohort study used data extracted from the medical records of adult inpatients with hypertension and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 between 1 March 2020 and 31 August 2020 with definite outcomes (discharged from hospital or deceased) from Erasme Hospital (Brussels, Belgium). We re-analyzed the data of the retrospective cohort study using only the 184 patients (103 males, 81 females) with a mean age of 69.54 years (SD = 14.6) with hypertension. The fifty-five participants (29.9%) receiving a chronic prescription of amlodipine were compared with the 129 patients who did not receive a chronic prescription of amlodipine. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to explore the relationships between mortality and sex, age, comorbidities, smoking, and amlodipine status. Out of the 184 participants, 132 (71.7%) survived and 52 (28.3%) died. The mortality rates were, respectively, 12.73% (n = 7) and 34.88% (n = 45) for the amlodipine and non-amlodipine groups. Multivariate logistic regression was significant (Chi square (5) = 29.11; *p* < 0.0001). Chronic kidney disease and malignant neoplasm were significant predictors as well as amlodipine status. For chronic kidney disease and malignant neoplasm, the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were, respectively, 2.16 (95% CI: 1.04–4.5; *p* = 0.039) and 2.46 (95% CI: 1.01–6.01; *p* = 0.047). For amlodipine status the odds ratio was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11–0.74; *p* = 0.009). The result of the present study suggests that amlodipine may be associated with reduced mortality in people with hypertension infected with COVID-19. Further research and randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the potential protective effect of amlodipine in people with hypertension infected with COVID-19.

**Keywords:** functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase (FIASMAs); COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; mortality; amlodipine; calcium channel blockers (CCBs); calcium

## 1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic due to the novel severe acute respiratory virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1] with more than 437 million cases and 6 million deaths

<footnote n="1">1 Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium; gil.darquennes@erasme.ulb.ac.be</footnote>

<footnote n="2">2 Research Unit (ULB 266), Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium</footnote>

<footnote n="3">3 Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium; philippe.van.de.borne@erasme.ulb.ac.be</footnote>

<footnote n="4">4 Pôle Pharmacie, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Pharmacie, CHU de Rennes, 35033 Rennes, France; pascal.le-corre@univ-rennes1.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="5">5 Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail)-UMR_S 1085, CHU Rennes, INSERM, EHESP, University of Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France</footnote>

<footnote n="6">6 Laboratoire de Biopharmacie et Pharmacie Clinique, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Rennes 1, 35043 Rennes, France</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: gwenole.loas@erasme.ulb.ac.be</footnote>
in March 2022. Epidemiological studies have suggested that individuals with chronic underlying comorbidities such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, or diabetes are at risk for a severe outcome. Beyond the interest of vaccination, therapeutic strategies targeting the immune response or endothelial cell barrier integrity are currently under investigation in clinical trials. Viruses use the human cell environment for replication and induce abnormal function in host cells.

Several authors, considering: (1) the importance of intracellular calcium for the life cycle of viruses, (2) the positive association between hypocalcemia with COVID-19 severity; (3) the importance of promoting perfusion with pulmonary vasodilatation, have suggested an interest in calcium channel blockers (CCBs) for the treatment of people infected with COVID-19 [2–4]. To satisfy their need for calcium, several viruses induce an increased flux of calcium across cell membranes: CCBs reduce the levels of intracellular calcium [2]. CCBs, notably amlodipine, also have anti-inflammatory and anticoagulation effects in humans and cell models [2]. Several authors have proposed the hypothesis that hypocalcemia could be a physiological state characterizing COVID-19 and representing a beneficial host defense rather than a pathology [2]. The inhibitory effect of CCBs during viral infections has been reported for verapamil, an influenza A virus inhibitor, cilnidipine and manidipine, inhibitors for Japanese encephalitis virus, and L-type Ca<sub>V</sub> channel inhibitor gabapentin, effective against hemorragic fever arenavirus [5].

There are two distinct chemical classes of CCBs: the dihydropyridines (DHP) (such as nifedipine and amlodipine) and the non-dihydropyridines (diltiazem and verapamil).

Our interest in CCBs is based on in vitro or clinical studies. Six in vitro studies [6–11] have reported that several CCBs (amlodipine, benidipine, cilnidipine, diltiazem, efonidipine, felodipine, fendiline, lercanidipine, manidipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, and verapamil) can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication (see Discussion for detailed descriptions of the studies).

Several retrospective or prospective clinical studies have explored the association between use of CCBs and clinical outcome in people infected with COVID-19. These studies have been analyzed in two meta-analyses [12,13]. In the first meta-analysis [12], 31 eligible studies were retained, including 119,298 patients with COVID-19 with or without hypertension, and CCB use was not associated with reduced mortality. Subgroup analysis in patients with hypertension (10 studies with 11,548 patients) revealed significantly reduced mortality (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52–0.91, *p* = 0.009). No difference in use of dihydropyridine was reported (5 studies with 5895 patients with or without hypertension). The second meta-analysis [13] explored the clinical outcome of only patients with hypertension infected with COVID-19. The authors retained 9 studies with 18,835 patients, and the meta-analysis of seven studies with 8413 patients revealed a significant reduction of mortality with the pre-admission use of CCBs (OR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.49–0.86). There was only one common study between the two meta-analyses.

Thus, the two meta-analyses reported that, in patients with hypertension infected with COVID-19, significant reduced mortality was associated with CCB use, confirming the in vitro studies that found significant effects of CCB drugs on SARS-CoV-2 replication. However, this relationship has not been explored in hypertensive patients when only dihydropyridine (DHP) drugs are prescribed. One open and unresolved question is the possibility that DHP drugs could have variable action on the SARS-CoV-2. For example, among the six in vitro studies, two [6,10] reported the superiority of amlodipine over other DHP drugs. The cause for the different effects of DHP drugs could be related to an additional mechanism of action against the SARS-CoV-2.

Acid sphingomyelinase (ASM) plays a crucial role in viral infection and the antiviral properties of functional inhibitors of ASM have been reported for several decades. Various FDA-approved drugs have been tested in vitro to explore their potential inhibition of ASM. Kornhuber et al. [14] have identified 72 FIASMAs that are defined by a reduction of ASM activity of at least 50% at 10 µM concentration. Among the FDA-approved drugs tested there were four DHP drugs (amlodipine, lercanidipine, barnidipine, cilnidipine) and
only amlodipine had a reduction of ASM activity of at least 50% (88%). To the best of our knowledge, the FIASMA properties of the other DHP drugs have not been studied.

Several studies (see review in [15]) have found that FIASMAs have anti-SARS-CoV-2 properties, notably amlodipine.

Among the different FIASMAs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), notably fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, are the most studied drugs. Several in vitro studies have reported that fluoxetine inhibited the entry and propagation of SARS-CoV-2 in the cell culture model without cytotoxic effects [16,17], and two studies have found that combination therapy including fluoxetine exerts antiviral effects against SARS-CoV-2. The first study [18] reported that a combined treatment with fluoxetine and GS-441524, the principal serum metabolite of remdesivir, displayed antiviral effects against three SARS-CoV-2 variants in vitro. The second study [19] tested the fluoxetine–remdesivir combination on the SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro and found impaired viral replication with combination treatment to be well-tolerated. Several clinical retrospective and prospective studies have been reported, suggesting that fluvoxamine and fluoxetine could be a potential treatment of COVID-19. However, important methodological limitations of the different studies mean they should be interpreted with caution [20].

The studies on amlodipine comprised five in silico studies, three in vitro studies, and five clinical studies. There were four retrospective studies [6,21–23] and only one prospective study [24] that showed a more favorable outcome in four of the five studies for subjects treated with amlodipine compared to those not treated with amlodipine (see discussion for detailed descriptions of the studies). The effect of FIASMAs is related to the duration of the prescription within the study. The elimination half-life of amlodipine ranges from 30 to 50 h, therefore a duration of at least 9 to 15 days (7 half-lives) is required.

The characteristics of the clinical studies examining the relationship between amlodipine and mortality are summarized in Table S1. Unfortunately, there are not any studies exploring the mortality rate only for inpatients with hypertension and COVID-19 infection, with chronic prescription of amlodipine, taking into account the comorbidities and confounding covariables.

In order to meet the limitations of the previous retrospective studies we have performed a new analysis of our retrospective cohort study [22].

## 2. Results

Of the participants, 184 with hypertension were retained (see Table 1). Of these 184 participants, 55 were treated with amlodipine (before the infection) and 129 received either antihypertensive drugs (including amlodipine prescribed after the hospitalization, and 22 patients receiving at least one another FIASMA) or had no antihypertensive drugs.

For the first analysis (55 Amlodipine versus 129 *n*-Amlodipine), five univariate logistic regressions reported significant associations between mortality and age, chronic kidney disease, malignant neoplasm, dementia, and amlodipine status. All five significant predictors were introduced in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The regression was significant (Chi square (5) = 29.11; *p* < 0.0001). Chronic kidney disease and malignant neoplasm were significant predictors, the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were, respectively, 2.16 (95% CI: 1.04–4.5; *p* = 0.039) and 2.46 (95% CI: 1.01–6.01; *p* = 0.047). For amlodipine status the odds ratio was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11–0.74; *p* = 0.009) (see Table 2).

For the second analysis (55 Amlodipine versus 107 *n*-Amlodipine and other FIASMAs), five univariate logistic regressions reported significant associations between mortality and age, chronic kidney disease, malignant neoplasm, dementia, and amlodipine status. All five significant predictors were introduced in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The regression was significant (Chi square (5) = 26.66; *p* < 0.0001). Chronic kidney disease and malignant neoplasm were significant predictors, as well as amlodipine status. The odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were, respectively, 2.47 (95% CI: 1.09–5.58; *p* = 0.028) and 3.11 (95% CI: 1.16–8.31; *p* = 0.022). For amlodipine status the odds ratio was 0.3 (95% CI: 0.11–0.78; *p* = 0.013) (see Table 2).
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Demographic and clinical characteristics of inpatients with COVID-19 with hypertension (n = 184).</caption><thead><tr><th>Demographic/Clinical Characteristics.</th><th>n (%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Age</td><td>69.54 +/− 14.6 *</td></tr><tr><td>Sex</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Female</td><td>81 (44)</td></tr><tr><td>Male</td><td>103 (56)</td></tr><tr><td>Comorbidities</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Diabetes</td><td>76 (41.3)</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic lung diseases</td><td>38 (20.6)</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic liver diseases</td><td>23 (12.5)</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic cardiac diseases</td><td>81 (44)</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic rheumatic disease</td><td>33 (17.9)</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic kidney disease</td><td>60 (32.6)</td></tr><tr><td>Malignant neoplasm</td><td>28 (15.2)</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic neurologic disorders</td><td>47 (25.5)</td></tr><tr><td>Dementia</td><td>20 (10.9)</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic hematologic disease</td><td>29 (15.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Asthma</td><td>13 (7)</td></tr><tr><td>Obesity</td><td>54 (29.3)</td></tr><tr><td>Smoking</td><td>13 (7.1)</td></tr><tr><td>Mortality</td><td>52 (28.3)</td></tr><tr><td>Amlodipine (chronic)</td><td>55 (29.9)</td></tr><tr><td>Other antihypertensive drugs</td><td>26 (14.1)</td></tr><tr><td>No antihypertensive drugs</td><td>103 (56)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Risk factors for mortality among patients with COVID-19 with hypertension.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Variable</th><th colspan="3">n = 184, (55 Amlodipine, 129 n-Amlodipine)</th><th colspan="3">n = 162, (55 Amlodipine, 107 n-Amlodipine)</th></tr><tr><th>Univariate Analysis</th><th>Multivariable Analysis</th><th>Univariate Analysis</th><th>Multivariable Analysis</th><th>Univariate Analysis</th><th>Multivariable Analysis</th></tr><tr><th></th><th>OR</th><th>95% CI</th><th>p-Value</th><th>aOR</th><th>95% CI</th><th>p-Value</th><th>aOR</th><th>95% CI</th><th>p-Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Age</td><td>1.04</td><td>1.01–1.07</td><td>0.0018</td><td>1.03</td><td>0.99–1.06</td><td>0.05</td><td>1.03</td><td>1–1.06</td><td>0.016</td></tr><tr><td>Female sex (vs. male)</td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Comorbidities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Diabetes</td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic lung diseases</td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic liver diseases</td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic cardiac diseases</td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic rheumatic disease</td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic kidney disease</td><td>2.57</td><td>1.31–5.02</td><td>0.006</td><td>2.16</td><td>1.04–4.5</td><td>0.039</td><td>2.71</td><td>1.31–5.62</td><td>0.007</td></tr><tr><td>Malignant neoplasm</td><td>2.6</td><td>1.13–5.97</td><td>0.023</td><td>2.46</td><td>1.01–6.01</td><td>0.047</td><td>3.45</td><td>1.4–8.5</td><td>0.007</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic neurologic disorders</td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Dementia</td><td>2.9</td><td>1.12–7.51</td><td>0.027</td><td>1.57</td><td>0.55–4.51</td><td>0.4</td><td>3.66</td><td>1.23–10.89</td><td>0.019</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic hematologic disease</td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Asthma</td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Obesity</td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>Smoking</td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>AMLODIPINE</td><td>0.27</td><td>0.11–0.65</td><td>0.003</td><td>0.29</td><td>0.11–0.74</td><td>0.009</td><td>0.29</td><td>0.12–0.70</td><td>0.006</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote>* Mean +/− SD.</footnote>

<footnote>OR: Odds ratio; aOR: adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval. NS: no significance; 107 n-Amlodipine = 129 n-Amlodipine -22 subjects receiving another chronic FIASMA.</footnote>
### 3. Discussion

The main result of the present study is a significant relationship between chronic intake of amlodipine and decreased mortality in inpatients with hypertension and COVID-19 infection. This significant relationship was found in unadjusted analyses as well as in adjusted analyses, taking into account sociodemographic variables and comorbidities. The results of the present study could suggest a protective effect of chronic intake of amlodipine in patients with COVID-19.

Six in vitro studies reported that several CCBs, notably amlodipine, could be candidates in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2.

The first study [6] tested whether CCBs can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication. Vero E6 cells were treated with a panel of nine CCBs (benidipine, amlodipine, cilnidipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, isradipine, nimodipine, nisodipine, felodipine) and then infected with SARS-CoV-2. Benidipine, amlodipine, cilnidipine, and nicardipine showed more significant effect, and antihypertensive drugs angiotensin II receptors blockers (ARBs) and angiotensine-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) did not show an in vitro anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect.

The second study [7] screened 2000 approved drugs and found that 17 could be inhibitors of the main protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2. These 17 drugs were tested in vitro (kinetic assay) for Mpro inhibition. Among the 17 drugs, 5 provided IC50 values below 40 µM: manidipine, boceprevir, lercanidipine, bedaquiline, and efonidipine.

The third study [8] screened 1700 USA FDA-approved using human coronavirus strain OC43 to identify drugs with anti corona viral effects. The retained compounds were screened for their inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 using Vero cells. Twenty anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs were retained, including two CCBs: amlodipine and fendiline.

The fourth study [9] screened 1971 FDA-approved drugs using a nano-luciferase SARS-CoV-2 tag. Thirty-five drugs, including manidipine, reduced replication in vero cells and human hepatocytes when infected prior to SARS-CoV-2.

The fifth study [10] selected five drugs from different classes that all inhibit high voltage-activated Ca2+ channels of L-type (three dihydropyridines: amlodipine, nifedipine, felodipine; phenylalkylamine: verapamil; benzothiazepine: diltiazem). Vero E6 cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2. Amlodipine, felodipine, and nifedipine were highly selective against SARS-CoV-2.

The sixth study [11] identified eight small molecules, including amlodipine, capable of reversing the transcriptional landscape induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection. These eight drugs were tested on Vero-E6 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 as well as on human pluripoent stem-cell-derived pancreatic endocrine organoid cultures. Among the eight drugs, four were the most potent (amlodipine, berbamine, loperamide, and terfenadine).

Thus, among the six studies that included at least one DHP drug, four included amlodipine. Among these four studies, three reported that amlodipine was one of the most potent drugs retained.

Five clinical studies have explored the association between amlodipine intake and prognosis in patients infected with COVID-19 (see Table S1 for studies exploring mortality).

The first retrospective study [21] studied 65 inpatients who were at or above the age of 65 years. Twenty-four patients took amlodipine and nifedipine and 41 did not take CCBs. The rates of hypertension were, respectively, 91.7% (n= 22) and 82.9% (n= 34): the difference was not significant. The mortality rates were, respectively, 50 and 85.4% in the CCB and non-CCB groups (p = 0.0036). No information on the duration of prescription before hospitalization was given.

The second study [6] explored 96 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with hypertension (without other comorbidities): 19 were treated by amlodipine and 77 treated by non-amlodipine. The rates of mortality were, respectively, 0 (n = 0) and 19.5% (n = 15) on amlodipine and non-amlodipine (p = 0.0037). No information on the duration of prescription before hospitalization was given.
The third study [22] explored 317 hospitalized patients with COVID-19: 60 patients (55 with hypertension) on chronic intake of amlodipine and 257 (129 with hypertension) without chronic intake of amlodipine or other FIASMAs. Multiple regression controlling for age and comorbidities found that amlodipine intake was significantly associated with lower risk of intubation or mortality (Adjusted OR = 0.24, *p* = 0.0031).

The fourth study [23] reported on, in an observational multicenter study on individuals hospitalized for severe COVID-19, the relationship between FIASMAs and risk of intubation or death. There were 97 patients receiving amlodipine (% hypertension unknown) and these were compared to 2569 patients (873 with cardiovascular disorders, 34%) who had no FIASMA medication. Amlodipine was received within the first 24 h of hospital admission. Multivariable Cox regression analysis found that amlodipine intake was significantly associated with lower risk of intubation or mortality (Hazard Ratio = 0.7, *p* = 0.037).

The prospective study [24] was a randomized clinical trial comparing hospitalized primary patients with hypertension receiving either 50 mg of losartan or 5 mg of amlodipine per day for 2 weeks. The main outcomes were 30-day mortality rate and length of hospital stay. No significant difference between the two groups was reported. Unfortunately, the study has many weaknesses (e.g., no a priori calculation of number of subjects to detect significant difference, no a priori stratification on age before randomization), calling the results into question [25].

The strengths of the present study relative to other published studies (see Table S1) are the hypothesis of a particular effect of amlodipine related to its FIASMA status, the chronic prescription of the drug, the mortality as the main criterion, the study on only inpatients with COVID-19 with hypertension, the control of other comorbidities, and the control of prescription of other FIASMAs. To the best of our knowledge no study has explored the role of amlodipine in patients with COVID-19 with hypertension using this methodological caution.

The limitations of the study are related to its retrospective design, the use of only one hospital for the recruitment, and that the precise cause of death has not been verified by systematic autopsies.

Concerning bioavailability, amlodipine has a low hepatic extraction ratio leading to a high bioavailability (around 65%) and is metabolized by CYP3A4 with a small contribution of CYP3A5. However, co-administration of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors may increase amlodipine plasma exposure. Co-administration amlodipine with indinavir co-administered with low-dose ritonavir (a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor) has led to a 1.9-fold increase in area under the curve (AUC) [26]. However, co-administration of amlodipine with grapefruit juice did not modify its AUC, while other dihydropyridines showed an increase in AUC (2- and 3-fold for nisoldipine and felodipine, respectively) [27]. Hence, co-administration with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors including drugs to be used in COVID-19 treatment such as Paxlovid (association of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir) may be used with caution, and dose adjustment strategies have been described [28]. Caution should also be considered in patients with HIV with ritonavir-boosted treatments, where halving the dosage has been suggested [29].

Concerning the mechanisms of action, amlodipine and other CCBs reduce levels of intracellular calcium, exert anti-inflammatory and anticoagulation effects, and have vasodilatory effects in the lungs and vascular system [2].

From a genetic point of view, one author has tested the hypothesis that the excessive immune-defense reactions with inflammation and coagulation (cytokines storm) could be a primary cause of death in patients with COVID-19 [30]. Genetic studies have explored the genetic risk factors associated with COVID-19 mortality. Allelic variation at seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) has been significantly associated with COVID-19 mortality. These seven SNPs were relevant to inflammation, coagulation, and respiratory functions. The association study exploring the phenotypes that could be associated to the seven SNPs has reported that use of amlodipine has been linked with four of the seven SNPs (see Table 1 in reference [30]).
In addition to the effect on calcium metabolism, amlodipine as a FIASMA has a protective ability against SARS-CoV-2, as shown in *in vitro* studies [15].

In addition to the effect on SARS-CoV-2, it is interesting to point out that both CCBs (verapamil, nimodipine, diltiazem) and fluoxetine reduced ebola infection efficiency using *in vitro* models [31,32].

# 4. Materials and Methods

## 4.1. Study Design and Participants

We used data from the Erasme Hospital of Brussels (Belgium) using the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC) COVID-19 database. The database includes individuals for whom data collection commenced on or before 1 September 2020. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Erasme Hospital (Protocol P2020/358 approved on 16 July 2020). Using the initial cohort of 616 individuals, we selected 350 participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by laboratory testing who were either alive on the 31 August 2020, or deceased in the hospital during the course of their hospitalization. Seventy-two patients died during hospitalization and 278 survived. Demographic data regarding symptoms, comorbidities, laboratory findings on admission, and outcomes were retrieved from the ISARIC COVID-19 database of the Erasme hospital and retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The "Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Epidemiology" statement guidelines were followed in the conduct and reporting of the study.

Patients with a long-term prescription of FIASMAs at admission were noted as FIASMAs positive (F+). Chronicity was defined as a duration equal to or higher than seven half-lives for each FIASMA (half-life range: 35–50 min (melatonin) to 20–100 days (amiodarone).

In Belgium, 28 FIASMAs are available, including one calcium-channel blocker (amlodipine), one Class 1 and 3 antiarrhythmic drugs (amiodarone), and one beta blocking agent (carvedilol). The participants who did not receive chronic FIASMAs on admission were noted as FIASMAs negative (F-). If a patient who did not receive chronic FIASMAs on admission had a new prescription of FIASMAs on the first day of hospitalization then they were classified as FIASMAs negative except for melatonin (7 half-lives: 6–7 h), alverine (7 half-life: 6 h), or cloperastine (7 half-lives: 24 h).

The following comorbidities were recorded: diabetes, hypertension, chronic liver disease, chronic rheumatic disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic cardiac disease (except hypertension), malignant neoplasm, chronic neurological disorders (except dementia), dementia, chronic lung disease (except asthma), chronic hematologic disease, asthma, obesity (defined by body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m²), and smoking.

In the previously published study the analysis was completed on 317 subjects (60 subjects on amlodipine and 257 subjects FIASMAs negative). For the present study only the 184 patients with hypertension were retained (see Figure S1 flow chart and Table S2). Fifty-five patients were treated with amlodipine (before the infection) and 129 received either antihypertensive drugs (including amlodipine prescribed after the hospitalization) or had no antihypertensive drugs. Among the 129 subjects, those receiving antihypertensive treatment had as the main pharmacological class of drugs: beta-blockers (32%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (19%), angiotensin receptor blockers (16%), CCBs (16%), and diuretics (13%). Among the 129 subjects, 22 received at least one other FIASMA. The prescribed daily dose of amlodipine on the 55 subjects was given using the rate of defined daily dose (DDD). The rate of DDD for amlodipine was 137.6% (SD = 53%). Since the DDD of amlodipine is 5 mg per day, the rate of DDD for amlodipine on the 55 subjects was 6.88 mg per day (SD = 2.65). Antibiotics were received by 82.2% patients, and 10.5% received antivirals (notably remdesivir).

## 4.2. Statistical Analysis

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate risk factors of mortality among patients with COVID-19 using Statistica (version 7.1) software [33].
The dependent variable was the status (alive or deceased) and the independent variables
were sex, age, each comorbidity, smoking, and amlodipine status.

From univariate analyses, each independent variable with significant association with mortality (*p* < 0.05) was included in the multivariate analysis, except for the amlodipine status, which is a forced variable.

Two analyses were completed.

First, the 55 subjects treated chronically by amlodipine were compared with the 129 pa-
tients treated or not for their hypertension (including patients receiving an acute prescrip-
tion of amlodipine at the start of hospitalization). The mortality rates were, respectively,
12.73% (n = 7) and 34.88% (n = 45) for the amlodipine and non-amlodipine groups.

Second, the 55 subjects treated chronically by amlodipine were compared with the 107 patients treated or not for their hypertension and who did not receive another FIASMAs given chronically (n = 22), as these drugs could have protective effects on patients with COVID-19. The mortality rates were, respectively, 12.73% (n = 7) and 33.64% (n = 36) for the amlodipine and non-amlodipine groups.

**5. Conclusions**

The present study suggests a protective effect of amlodipine in inpatients with COVID-19 and hypertension. It must be confirmed, firstly, in larger multicenter retrospective studies, and secondly, by double-blind controlled randomized clinical trials in patients with COVID-19 and hypertension. Re-analysis of data on amlodipine of previously published CCB retrospective studies is also suggested. Taking into account that there is some data for, firstly, the combination treatment in cells infected by SARS-CoV-2 with remdesivir or its predominant serum metabolite GS-441524 with fluoxetine [18,19], or secondly, the combination treatment in infected cells with remdesivir and diltiazem and another CCB [34], combination treatment using amlodipine with remdesivir could be investigated.

From a practical point of view, we can suggest, only for patients with COVID-19 infection and treated by CCBs for their hypertension, a switch to amlodipine.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph15030380/s1, Figure S1: Population flow chart for Amlodipine study in patients with COVID-19; Table S1: Characteristics of clinical studies exploring relationships between mortality in patients with COVID-19 with hypertension. Table S2: STROBE for amlodipine study in patients with COVID-19.

**Author Contributions:** G.L. and P.L.C. conceived the idea and designed the study. G.L. had full access to all the data in the study and took responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. G.D. collected the data and took responsibility for its integrity. P.V.d.B. conceived the idea. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** The present study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Erasme Hospital (Protocol P2020/358 approved the 16 July 2020).

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** Anonymized individual-level data from the survey will be made available through the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC) COVID-19 database. Requests for access will be reviewed by the data access committee of the Erasme hospital.

**Acknowledgments:** We acknowledge Jean-Charles Preiser (Research Department of the Erasme Hospital) for guidance in the use of the ISARIC database, Patrice Navez for help with the mortality data, and Olivier Le Moine for help to explore the feasibility of the study.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.
## References

1. Wang, C.; Horby, P.W.; Hayden, F.G.; Gao, G.F. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. *Lancet* **2020**, *395*, 470–473.
[CrossRef]

2. Crespi, B.; Alcock, J. Conflicts over calcium and the treatment of COVID-19. *Evol. Med. Public Health* **2021**, *9*, 149–156. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Sadeghpopur, S.; Ghasemnejad-Berenji, H.; Pashapour, S.; Ghasemnejad-Berenji, M. Using of calcium channel blockers in patients with COVID-19: A magic bullet or a double-edged sword? *J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol.* **2021**, *33*, 117–119. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Solaimanzadeh, I. Why Pulmonary Vasodilation May Be Part of a Key Strategy to Improve Survival in COVID-19. *Cureus* **2021**, *13*, e20746. [CrossRef]

5. Berlansky, S.; Sallinger, M.; Grabmayr, H.; Humer, C.; Bernhard, A.; Fahrner, M.; Frischauf, I. Calcium Signals during SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Assessing the Potential of Emerging Therapies. *Cells* **2022**, *11*, 253. [CrossRef]

6. Zhang, L.; Sun, Y.; Zeng, H.L.; Peng, Y.; Jiang, X.; Shang, W.J. Calcium channel blocker amlodipine besylate is associated with reduced case fatality rate of COVID-19 patients with hypertension. *Cell Discov.* **2020**, *6*, 96. [CrossRef]

7. Ghahremanpour, M.M.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Deshmukh, M.; Ippolito, J.A.; Zhang, C.H.; Cabeza de Vaca, I.; Liosi, M.E.; Anderson, K.S.; Jorgensen, W.L. Identification of 14 Known Drugs as Inhibitors of the Main Protease of SARS-CoV-2. *ACS Med. Chem. Lett.* **2020**, *11*, 2526–2533. [CrossRef]

8. Xiao, X.; Wang, C.; Chang, D.; Wang, Y.; Dong, X.; Jiao, T.; Zhao, Z.; Ren, L.; Cruz, C.S.D.; Sharma, L.; et al. Identification of Potent and Safe Antiviral Therapeutic Candidates Against SARS-CoV-2. *Front. Immunol.* **2020**, *11*, 586572. [CrossRef]

9. Pickard, A.; Calverley, B.C.; Chang, J.; Garva, R.; Gago, S.; Lu, Y.; Kadler, K.E. Discovery of re-purposed drugs that slow SARS-CoV-2 replication in human cells. *PLoS Pathog.* **2021**, *17*, e1009840. [CrossRef]

10. Straus, M.R.; Bidon, M.K.; Tang, T.; Jaimes, J.A.; Whittaker, G.R.; Daniel, S. Inhibitors of L-Type Calcium Channels Show Therapeutic Potential for Treating SARS-CoV-2 Infections by Preventing Virus Entry and Spread. *ACS Infect. Dis.* **2021**, *7*, 2807–2815. [CrossRef]

11. Hoagland, D.A.; Clarke, D.J.B.; Møller, R.; Han, Y.; Yang, L.; Wojciechowicz, M.L.; Lachmann, A.; Oguntuyo, K.Y.; Stevens, C.; Lee, B.; et al. Modulating the transcriptional landscape of SARS-CoV-2 as an effective method for developing antiviral compounds. *Biorxiv* **2020**. [CrossRef]

12. Alsagaff, M.Y.; Mulia, E.P.B.; Magfirah, I.; Luke, K.; Nugraha, D.; Rachmi, D.A.; Septianda, I.; A'Yun, M.Q. Association of calcium channel blocker use with clinical outcome of COVID-19: A meta-analysis. *Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev.* **2021**, *15*, 102210. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Kow, C.S.; Ramachandram, D.S.; Hasan, S.S. Clinical outcomes of hypertensive patients with COVID-19 receiving calcium channel blockers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. *Hypertens. Res.* **2021**, *45*, 360–363. [CrossRef]

14. Kornhuber, J.; Tripal, P.; Reichel, M.; Mühle, C.; Rhein, C.; Muehlbacher, M.; Groemer, T.W.; Gulbins, E. Functional Inhibitors of Acid Sphingomyelinase (FIASMAs): A Novel Pharmacological Group of Drugs with Broad Clinical Applications. *Cell. Physiol. Biochem.* **2010**, *26*, 9–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15. Loas, G.; Le Corre, P. Update on Functional Inhibitors of Acid Sphingomyelinase (FIASMAs) in SARS-CoV-2 Infection. *Pharmaceuticals* **2021**, *14*, 691. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16. Schloer, S.; Brunotte, L.; Goretzko, J.; Mecate-Zambrano, A.; Korthals, N.; Gerke, V.; Ludwig, S.; Rescher, U. Targeting the endolysosomal host-SARS-CoV-2 interface by clinically licensed functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase (FIASMA) including the antidepressant fluoxetine. *Emerg. Microbes Infect.* **2020**, *9*, 2245–2255. [CrossRef]

17. Dechaumes, A.; Nekoua, M.P.; Belouzard, S.; Sane, F.; Engelmann, I.; Dubuisson, J.; Alidjinou, E.K.; Hober, D. Fluoxetine Can Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 In Vitro. *Microorganisms* **2021**, *9*, 339. [CrossRef]

18. Brunotte, L.; Zheng, S.; Mecate-Zambrano, A.; Tang, J.; Ludwig, S.; Rescher, U.; Schloer, S. Combination Therapy with Fluoxetine and the Nucleoside Analog GS-441524 Exerts Synergistic Antiviral Effects against Different SARS-CoV-2 Variants In Vitro. *Pharmaceuticals* **2021**, *13*, 1400. [CrossRef]

19. Schloer, S.; Brunotte, L.; Mecate-Zambrano, A.; Zheng, S.; Tang, J.; Ludwig, S.; Rescher, U. Drug synergy of combinatory treatment with remdesivir and the repurposed drugs fluoxetine and itraconazole effectively impairs SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. *J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.* **2021**, *178*, 2339–2350. [CrossRef]

20. Le Corre, P.; Loas, G. Difficulty in repurposing SSRIs and other antidepressants with functional inhibition of acid sphingomyelinase in COVID-19 infection. *Front. Pharmacol.* **2022**, *13*, 849095. [CrossRef]

21. Solaimanzadeh, I. Nifedipine and Amlodipine Are Associated with Improved Mortality and Decreased Risk for Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation in Elderly Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19. *Cureus* **2020**, *12*, e8069. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. Darquennes, G.; Le Corre, P.; Le Moine, O.; Loas, G. Association between Functional Inhibitors of Acid Sphingomyelinase (FIASMAs) and Reduced Risk of Death in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. *Pharmaceuticals* **2021**, *14*, 226. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23. Hoertel, N.; Sánchez-Rico, M.; Gulbins, E.; Kornhuber, J.; Carpinteiro, A.; Lenze, E.J.; Reiersen, A.M.; Abellán, M.; De La Muela, P.; Vernet, R.; et al. Association Between FIASMAs and Reduced Risk of Intubation or Death in Individuals Hospitalized for Severe COVID-19: An Observational Multicenter Study. *Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.* **2021**, *110*, 1498–1511. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Nouri-Vaskeh, M.; Kalami, N.; Zand, R.; Soroureddin, Z.; Varshochi, M.; Ansarin, K.; Rezaee, H.; Taghizadieh, A.; Sadeghi, A.; Maleki, M.A.; et al. Comparison of losartan and amlodipine effects on the outcomes of patient with COVID-19 and primary hypertension: A randomised clinical trial. *Int. J. Clin. Pract.* **2021**, *75*, e14124. [CrossRef]

25. Loas, G.; Le Corre, P. Comment on ‘Comparison of losartan and amlodipine effects on the outcomes of patient with COVID-19 and primary hypertension: A randomised clinical trial’. *Int. J. Clin. Pr.* **2021**, *75*, e14957. [CrossRef]

26. Kummer, S.; Lander, A.; Goretzko, J.; Kirchoff, N.; Rescher, U.; Schloer, S. Pharmacologically induced endolysosomal cho-lesterol imbalance through clinically licensed drugs itraconazole and fluoxetine impairs Ebola virus infection in vitro. *Emerg. Microbes Infect.* **2022**, *11*, 195–207. [CrossRef]

27. Sakurai, Y.; Kolokoltsov, A.A.; Chen, C.-C.; Tidwell, M.W.; Bauta, W.E.; Klugbauer, N.; Grimm, C.; Wahl-Schott, C.; Biel, M.; Davey, R.A. Two-pore channels control Ebola virus host cell entry and are drug targets for disease treatment. *Science* **2015**, *347*, 995–998. [CrossRef]

28. Glesby, M.J.; Aberg, J.A.; Kendall, M.A.; Fichtenbaum, C.J.; Hafner, R.; Hall, S.; Grosskopf, N.; Zolopa, A.R.; Gerber, J.G. Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5159 Protocol Team. Pharmacokinetic interactions between indinavir plus ritonavir and calcium channel blockers. *Clin. Pharm. Ther.* **2005**, *78*, 143–153. [CrossRef]

29. Vincent, J.; Harris, S.I.; Foulds, G.; Dogolo, L.C.; Willavize, S.; Friedman, H.L. Lack of effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amlodipine. *Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.* **2000**, *50*, 455–463. [CrossRef]

30. Crespi, B. Evolutionary medical insights into the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. *Evol. Med. Public Health* **2020**, *2020*, 314–322. [CrossRef]

31. Mukherjee, D.; Zha, J.; Menon, R.M.; Shebley, M. Guiding dose adjustment of amlodipine after co-administration with ritonavir containing regimens using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. *J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn.* **2018**, *45*, 443–456. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

32. Courlet, P.; Guidi, M.; Saldanha, S.A.; Cavassini, M.; Stoeckle, M.; Buclin, T.; Marzolini, C.; Decosterd, L.A.; Csajka, C. Population pharmacokinetic modelling to quantify the magnitude of drug-drug interactions between amlodipine and antiretroviral drugs. *Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.* **2021**, *77*, 979–987. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

33. *Statistica Software*, Version 7.1; Statsoft: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2005.

34. Pizzorno, A.; Padey, B.; Julien, T.; Trouillet-Assant, S.; Traversier, A.; Errazuriz-Cerda, E.; Rosa-Calatrava, M. Charac-terization and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 in nasal and bronchial human airway epithelia. *Cell Rep. Med.* **2020**, *1*, 100059. [CrossRef] [PubMed]