# The invalidation of HspB1 gene in mouse alters the ultrastructural phenotype of muscles

Malek Kammoun, Brigitte B. Picard, Thierry T. Astruc, Mohammed Gagaoua, Denise Aubert, Muriel Bonnet, Véronique V. Blanquet, Isabelle Cassar-Malek

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Malek Kammoun, Brigitte B. Picard, Thierry T. Astruc, Mohammed Gagaoua, Denise Aubert, et al. The invalidation of HspB1 gene in mouse alters the ultrastructural phenotype of muscles. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11 (8), pp.1-19. 10.1371/journal.pone.0158644. http://02633628

HAL Id: hal-02633628

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02633628

Submitted on 27 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

RESEARCH ARTICLE

# The Invalidation of *HspB1* Gene in Mouse Alters the Ultrastructural Phenotype of Muscles

Malek Kammoun<sup>1,2</sup>, Brigitte Picard<sup>1,2</sup>, Thierry Astruc<sup>3</sup>, Mohammed Gagaoua<sup>1,4</sup>, Denise Aubert<sup>5</sup>, Muriel Bonnet<sup>1,2</sup>, Véronique Blanquet<sup>6</sup>, Isabelle Cassar-Malek<sup>1,2,*</sup>

1 INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France, 2 Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, BP 10448, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 3 INRA, UR0370, Qualité des Produits Animaux, F-63122, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France, 4 Equipe Maquav, INATAA, Université Frères Mentouri Constantine, Constantine, Algeria, 5 Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69364, Lyon, France, 6 INRA, UMR1061 Génétique Moléculaire animale, F-87060, Limoges, France

* isabelle.cassar-malek@clermont.inra.fr

## Abstract

Even though abundance of Hsp27 is the highest in skeletal muscle, the relationships between the expression of *HspB1* (encoding Hsp27) and muscle characteristics are not fully understood. In this study, we have analysed the effect of Hsp27 inactivation on mouse development and phenotype. We generated a mouse strain devoid of Hsp27 protein by homologous recombination of the *HspB1* gene. The *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mouse was viable and fertile, showing neither apparent morphological nor anatomical alterations. We detected a gender dimorphism with marked effects in males, a lower body weight (P < 0.05) with no obvious changes in the growth rate, and a lower plasma lipids profile (cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides, 0.001 < P< 0.05). The muscle structure of the animals was examined by optical microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Not any differences in the characteristics of muscle fibres (contractile and metabolic type, shape, perimeter, cross-sectional area) were detected except a trend for a higher proportion of small fibres. Different myosin heavy chains electrophoretic profiles were observed in the *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mouse especially the presence of an additional isoform. Electron microscopy revealed ultrastructural abnormalities in the myofibrillar structure of the *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mouse mutant mice (e.g. destructured myofibrils and higher gaps between myofibrils) especially in the m. *Soleus*. Combined with our previous data, these findings suggest that Hsp27 could directly impact the organization of muscle cytoskeleton at the molecular and ultrastructural levels.

## Introduction

The heat shock proteins (Hsps) are among the most conserved molecules in phylogeny. They are up-regulated in response to various adverse changes of the environmental conditions inducing cellular stress (e.g. heat shock, nutrient deficiencies, viral infections, various chemicals) [1].

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

OPEN ACCESS

**Citation:** Kammoun M, Picard B, Astruc T, Gagaoua M, Aubert D, Bonnet M, et al. (2016) The Invalidation of *HspB1* Gene in Mouse Alters the Ultrastructural Phenotype of Muscles. PLoS ONE 11(8): e0158644. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158644

**Editor:** Shao Jun Du, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, UNITED STATES

**Received:** February 3, 2016

**Accepted:** June 20, 2016

**Published:** August 11, 2016

**Copyright:** © 2016 Kammoun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Data Availability Statement:** All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

**Funding:** INRA Phase Division funded the study (http://www phase.inra.fr/en/).

**Competing Interests:** The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Their up-regulation in stressful conditions is a universal phenomenon, occurring in plant and animal species. In mammals, Hsps are grouped into six main families according to their molecular weight—Hsp110, Hsp90, Hsp70, Hsp60, Hsp47 (Large Hsp)—and the Hsp20 family (Small Hsps, 12–43 kDa). The small Hsp family comprises eleven members (including Hsp27) with various tissue distributions that share a conserved α-crystallin domain [2].

The small Heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27, also denoted Hsp25 in mouse) is constitutively present in a wide variety of tissues and cell lines. Hsp27 belongs to the Hsp chaperone network and plays a key role in the cellular response to stress including heat shock, oxidative and chemical stresses. It is constitutively expressed in small concentrations in the cytosol during unstressed conditions and translocates into or around the nucleus under stress conditions [3]. This protein is encoded by the *HspB1* gene and is transcriptionally regulated by HSF-1. Its post-translational phosphorylation allows for up to 4 isoelectric variants [4]. It is one of the most induced Hsps in response to stress, reaching 1% of the total cellular protein, but accumulates in a slower kinetics than that of Hsp70 the other highly stress responsive Hsp [5]. There is increasing evidences to substantiate Hsp27 as a molecular protector against disease [6] thus used as a biomarker in several disease states [7].

Muscle-specific transcriptional regulatory sequences are found in the *HspB1* gene and the abundance of Hsp27 is the highest in skeletal muscle [8] indicating a crucial role for muscle physiology. *HspB1* expression in muscle is induced by a variety of stimuli [9] e.g. increased physical activity [10] [11] including lifelong training [12], endurance training [13], and eccentric exercise [14]. Some protective functions of Hsp27 are suggested by its translocation from the cytosolic to myofibrillar fraction and binding to cytoskeletal structures such as Z-disk proteins [15] [14]. The chaperone-like properties of Hsp27 may stabilize myofibrillar proteins during stress conditions and prevent them from loss of function. The relationships between expression of *HspB1* and muscle phenotype have not yet been fully understood apart from a muscle type specific pattern of expression [8]. Hsp27 expression is further detected in zygotes and early embryos [16] and is regulated during mammalian development [17]. To date the role of constitutively expressed Hsp27 is still questioned during development. In this study we have examined the role of constitutive Hsp27 in mouse development and physiology, especially in muscle, by engineering an *HspB1*-null mouse and examining the associated phenotype.

# Material and Methods

## Animals and samples

**Generation of an HspB1-null mouse.** To investigate the role of Hsp27, we generated a constitutive *HspB1*-null mouse using embryonic stem (ES) cells. The cells were provided by the International Knockout Mouse Consortium in which 1.381 bases of the nucleotide sequence of the *HspB1* gene (http://www.velocigene.com/komp/detail/13573) were replaced by a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) based vector obtained from BMQ BAC library (Mouse Micer vector set 369N20) (Fig 1A). In the targeting vector, the reporter *LacZ* gene was fused in frame with the start codon of *HspB1* to replace the *HspB1* coding sequence. The mutated ES cells were derived from VGB6 ES cells (C57BL/6NTac background). Three different mutated clones were injected into Balb/c blastocysts to generate 13 chimeras at the SFR Biosciences—Plateau de Biologie Expérimentale de la Souris (PBES, Lyon, France). Male chimeras transmitting the targeted mutation were mated with females from C57BL/6J strain to generate F1 offspring at the experimental facility of nutrition and microbiology of the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA-France). Heterozygous animals (*HspB1⁺/⁻*) were identified by PCR analysis from tail DNA using different primers as depicted in Table 1. They were intercrossed to generate homozygous F2 mice (*HspB1⁻/⁻*) (Fig 1B). The F2 offspring were mated in
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 1.** Generation of the *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup>-null mouse. (A) The targeting vector was constructed by replacing 1.381 bases of the genomic DNA A, including the three exons of the *HspB1* gene, with a neomycin resistance (Neo) gene and *LacZ* reporter gene. The sequences of the primers used are given in Table 1. (B) PCR-based genotyping amplifies targeted construction of *LacZ* reporter gene and *Neo* gene by using primers P5 and P6 respectively. (C) β-gal activity encoded by the *LacZ* reporter gene was used to monitor gene expression in the m. *Tibialis anterior* of the *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> mouse. (D) Absence of Hsp27 protein as confirmed by western blotting on muscle homogenates prepared from *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> mouse and the wild-type (*HspB1*<sup>+/+</sup>) mouse.</figcaption></figure>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158644.g001

order to grow the heterozygous and homozygous strains. Data from heterozygous mice with intermediary phenotype between controls and mutants are not given here.

## HspB1-null mice handling

Mouse strains were housed at the technical platform of animal experimentation of UMR 1019 Human Nutrition (Theix, France). They were maintained in a light/dark cycle of 12 hrs, under a controlled room at a temperature of 22°C and humidity of 45–55%. They were fed *ad libitum* with a conventional diet. Experimental procedures and animal handling were done according to the French animal protection legislation including licensing of experimenters. They were reviewed and approved by the French Veterinary Services and the ethics committee, named “Comité Régional d’Ethique en Matière d’Expérimentation Animale Région Auvergne” (agreement number CE 84–12). All efforts were made to minimize suffering. None of the animals

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Primer sequences used for PCR-based genotyping.</caption><thead><tr><td>Primer pair</td><td>Forward sequence</td><td>Reverse sequence</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>P1</td><td>CTCGGAGATCCGACAGACG</td><td>TCTGGGCAC AAGGGAACTC</td></tr><tr><td>P2</td><td>GGGCTGCTTCTGACCTTCTG</td><td>CCATGTTCGTCTGCCTTTC</td></tr><tr><td>P3</td><td>TCCAGCTACCGGTATTACGC</td><td>CTCTGCATT CCTCCCCCTAA</td></tr><tr><td>P4</td><td>GGTTATCTCTTTTCCCACAG</td><td>ATTATGGTGGGCTAGGGATG</td></tr><tr><td>P5</td><td>TTGACTGTAGCGGGCTGATGTTG</td><td>GGTAAACTGGCTCGGATTAGGG</td></tr><tr><td>P6</td><td>TACTTTCTCGGCAGGAGCAAGGTG</td><td>TGGGATCGGCCATTGAACAAGATG</td></tr></tbody></table>

The location of the different primers are presented in Fig 1A

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158644.t001
utilized for this work became ill or died prior to the experimental endpoint. For plasma and tissue collection, the animals were anesthetized prior to euthanasia by cervical dislocation. Anaesthesia was induced by placing each mouse in an inhalation chamber with 4% isoflurane regulated with calibrated vaporizer.

The mice were weighed once a week during the first 12 postnatal weeks (wk) in order to follow the evolution of their body weight (BW). The average daily gain (ADG) during this period was calculated. Body weight and length were recorded at 8-wk (24 *HspBI*⁻/⁻ and 19 *HspBI*⁺/⁺), 12-wk (25 *HspBI*⁻/⁻ and 20 *HspBI*⁺/⁺) and 52-wk (6 *HspBI*⁻/⁻ and 6 *HspBI*⁺/⁺) of age. The body composition was also determined using the EchoMRI™ method that offers measurements of body fat mass and lean mass in live animals.

**Blood sampling.** Blood samples were collected from the retro orbital sinus under general anaesthesia at 4, 8 and 12 wk. Blood were sampled in tubes containing heparin to prevent the formation of clots or extension of existing clots within the blood. Then samples were centrifuged at 4°C (4000 rpm, 10 min) for plasma separation. Plasmas were kept as aliquot fractions at -80°C until analysis.

**Tissue collection.** Mice were sacrificed at 8-wk, 12-wk, and 52-wk of age after blood sampling. Three muscles differing in their fibre types composition were sampled immediately after death, namely the m. *Soleus* (Slow and Fast oxidative), m. *Gastrocnemius* (Fast oxido-glycolytic) and m. *Tibialis anterior* (Fast glycolytic). The liver and three adipose tissues (AT) namely inguinal AT, interscapular AT, and epididymal AT for males were sampled. Tissues were collected at 8-wk, 12-wk, and 52-wk of age. These ages were chosen in order to analyse the effect of Hsp27 inhibition at different stages of development. All the tissues were weighted, frozen in liquid nitrogen for molecular biology analyses or in an isopentane bath cooled by liquid nitrogen for histochemical analyses, and kept at -80°C until use. Ultrastructure analysis, was performed on 2 *HspBI*⁻/⁻ and 2 *HspBI*⁺/⁺mice of 12 weeks old. (*Soleus* and *Tibialis anterior* muscles were removed immediately after death from posterior members of mice. Muscles were pinned to each tendon on a plate cork preserving their lengths before dissection. Muscles were fixed overnight at 4°C by immersion in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.2.

## Measurements

**Plasma analyses.** The plasma concentrations of 26 parameters representative of muscular, hepatic, lipidic, and energetic metabolism (urea, glucose, amylase, uric acid, phosphorus, calcium, cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), cholinesterase, total bilirubin, total proteins, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, iron, albumin, creatinine, creatine kinase, creatine kinase MB, lactate, lactate dehydrogenase, magnesium, transferrin and hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase) were measured using a KONELAB 30 automat (Thermo scientific, Cergy Pontoise, France) at the Faculty of Science and Technology of Limoges (France) as described by Magnol et al. [18].

**Histology, immunohistochemical and β-galactosidase staining.** Serial sections of 10 µm thick, were cut on a cryostat (Cryo-star HM 560 Microm International GmbH, Germany) at -26°C, perpendicular to the muscle fibres. Adjacent sections were used for immunohistochemical and histochemical analyses and for β-galactosidase staining.

A semi-automatic classification of fibres was used for classification of muscle fibre by using a combination of only two anti- Myosin heavy chain (MyHC) antibodies [19]. For m. *Soleus* BA-D5 (specific of slow MyHC I) and SC71 (specific of IIa MyHC) were used on serial sections. For m. *Tibialis anterior* BF-F3 specific of IIb MyHC and SC71 were used on serial sections according to Kammoun et al. [19]. The anti-MyHC antibodies were purchased from
AGRO-BIO (La Ferté Saint-Aubin, France). After immuno-staining of MyHC isoforms, histo-
logical sections were visualized under an Olympus fluorescence microscope BX 51, using a 10X
objective (NA = 0.3) and adequate band pass filter (Alexa 488: excitation filter 460-495, emis-
sion filter 510-550, dichromatic mirror 505LP; Cy3: excitation filter 530-550, emission filter
575-625, dichromatic mirror 565LP) as described by Meunier et al. [20]. This technique
allowed us to determine the muscle fibre type proportions, meaning cross-sectional for an aver-
age 300 fibres per serial image. The metabolic fibre type was determined by revealing the succi-
nate dehydrogenase (SDH, a mitochondrial enzyme representative of oxidative metabolism)
activity according to Ashmore [21].

For *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mice muscles, serial sections were also stained for β-galactosidase (β-gal) activity in order to detect reporter gene expression. Individual images were assembled into composite panoramic images of MyHC analysis, SDH activity and β-gal staining.

**Electrophoretic separation of MyHC isoforms.** Myofibrillar proteins were extracted using a buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM NaPPi, 50 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM DTT according to the protocol described by Picard *et al.* [22]. After homogenization using a Polytron (x22 000), the muscle extract was subjected to a centrifugation at 2500 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Then the supernatants were diluted 1:1 (v/w) with glycerol and stored at -20°C until use. The protein concentrations of the extracts were determined according to the Bradford method [23] using the Bio-Rad Protein assay. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) at a concentration of 1 mg/mL was used as standard.

The samples were suspended in 1:1 v/v in a basic 2 x Laemmli solution containing 4% w/v SDS, 10% v/v β-mercaptoethanol, 20% v/v glycerol, 125 mM Tris (pH 6.8) and 0.01% w/v pyro nin Y, incubated at room temperature for 10 min and then heated (70°C) for 10 min. The MyHC isoforms were separated with SDS glycerol gel electrophoresis according to Picard *et al.* [22]. The stacking gel contained 4% polyacrylamide with a cross-link of 1.96%. The separating gel was an 8% polyacrylamide gradient with a cross-link of 1%. Three micrograms of protein extracts were loaded per well onto 0.75-mm-thick gels. The electrophoresis was run a Mini- PROTEAN® II vertical chamber (Bio-Rad, USA) at a constant voltage of 140V for 15 hours at 4°C. After staining in a Coomassie Blue dye solution, the gels were scanned using the Expression 10000XL Pro scanner (Epson) and the proportions of the different MyHCs bands were quanti- fied by densitometry with ImageQuant Software 5500 (Amersham Biosciences/GE Healthcare).

**Western-blot analyses.** Invalidation of *HspB1* gene was validated in the muscle of *HspB1*⁻/⁻ vs controls using a quantitative western-blotting technique as described by Chaze *et al.* [24]. Fifteen or thirteen µg of total protein extracts were separated by gel electrophoresis using SDS-PAGE [25]. After migration, the proteins were transferred onto PVDF membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA01730 U S A). Membranes were blocked using a TBS 1x buffer con- taining 5% skimmed milk and incubated under gentle agitation overnight at room temperature in the presence of the Hsp27 primary antibody (Santa Cruz: SC13132; 1/1000). The morning, the membranes were incubated at 37°C for 30 min. with the secondary fluorochrome-conju- gated LICOR-antibody. Infrared fluorescence detection was then used for protein quantifica- tion Membranes were scanned by the scanner Odyssey (LI-COR Biosciences) at 800 nm. Band volumes were quantified in the images using ImageQuant TL v 2003 software (Amersham).

**Ultrastructure and image analysis.** Small blocks (1 to 3 mm³ with fibre direction identi-
fied) were prepared from the glutaraldehyde fixed muscles and were post-fixed in 1% osmium
tetroxide in 0.1 M SCB with adapted pH (7.2 or 5.8) for 1 hr at room temperature. The blocks
were dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol and embedded in epoxy resin (TAAB, Euro-
bio France) by using an automatic microwave tissue processor for electron microscopy (EM
AMW, Leica company,Vienna, Austria). Ultra-thin sections (90 nm) were stained with uranyl
acetate and lead citrate and observed using a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi HM
7650) at 80 kV acceleration voltage. Micrographs were obtained using a Hamamatsu AMT digital camera system coupled to the microscope. All samples were prepared and observed at the Cellular Imaging Center for Health (CICS) lab at Clermont-Ferrand University (France).

The width of myofibrils and the intermyofibrillar spaces were determined on the images of soleus and tibialis longitudinal sections of 12 weeks old mice using the open source ImageJ software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). The grey scale ranges extend from 0 (black) to 255 (white). The image analysis included automatic thresholding, and morphological measuring. For each numerical object labelled the area estimation was based on pixels number count, the coloration intensity corresponded on an 8 bit grey level mean value. The analysis was performed on a total of 210 images distributed in 96 images for wild-type (n = 2 mice) and 114 images for *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mice (n = 2). Four fields were analysed per image and therefore the measurements were performed in 480 electron microscopy fields.

**Statistical analysis.** Statistical analyses were performed using the PROC GLM procedure (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) and mean comparisons by using post hoc procedures (Newman-Keuls) were performed to analyse differences (*P* < 0.05). The first model tested fixed effects of genotype, age, and gender, and all interactions for growth, body composition, tissue weights and plasma chemistry parameters. The second model tested fixed effects of genotype, muscle, and gender, and all interactions for muscle ultrastructure. Least squares means were generated for all interactions and main effects. For electronic microscopy micrographs the statistical analysis was carried out according to [26] using a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed by multiple comparisons *post-hoc* Tukey correction for analyzing the interactions. The analyses were performed using the repeated measure option of the PROC GLM of SAS software, and results were considered significant at *p* < 0.05. Values are presented as means ± sem.

# Results

## Broad general phenotyping of the *HspB1*-null mouse

The generated *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mice were viable, fertile and born after 21 days of gestation at the expected Mendelian distribution. Revelation of β-gal activity in muscle confirmed that the endogenous *HspB1* promoter driven construction was expressed in the *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mice (Fig 1C). Western blotting analysis of muscles homogenates confirmed the absence of Hsp27 (Fig 1D).

The *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mutant mice showed no apparent morphological or anatomical alterations compared to homozygous controls until up to 18 months. The weights of new born mice were lower compared to controls (1.3 g for *HspB1*⁻/⁻ vs 2 g for *HspB1*⁺/⁺, *P* < 0.001) at one day after birth. As expected, during postnatal development (S1 Dataset), there was a significant effect of age (0.001 *P* < 0.01, Table 2) and of gender (0.001 *P* < 0.05, Table 2) on growth and body composition parameters however a genotype effect was observed only for body weight (BW) (*P* < 0.05, Table 2). There was no genotype effect on tissue weights expressed as a proportion of animal BW (Table 2). Significant interactions were detected and reported in Table 2 for BW and relative weight of fat (gender × genotype, *P* < 0.05) liver and m. *Soleus* tissues (age × gender × genotype, *P* < 0.05).

Fig 2A illustrates BW evolution from 1 to 12 weeks of age in both genotypes. The BW of *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mice were significantly lower than that of controls from week 2 to 12 of age (*P* < 0.01) but the average daily gain (data not shown) did not differ between the two groups (0.21 to 0.23, *P* > 0.05). The *HspB1*⁻/⁻ males were lighter from 12-wk-old onwards (Fig 2B). Similar differences were recorded for females only at 12- wk of age. No differences were observed in length at the three ages analysed.

Of the 26 plasma parameters measured (Table 3), significant differences were detected between genotypes for the lipids profile (cholesterol, HDL, and triglycerides, 0.001 *P* < 0.05),
<table><caption>Table 2. Influence of *HspB1* gene disruption on growth parameters, body composition and relative tissue weights <fnref n="1" />.</caption><thead><tr><th>Main effect</th><th>BW, g</th><th>Length, cm</th><th>Fat, mg/g</th><th>Lean mg/g</th><th>Liver mg/g</th><th>m. Soleus mg/g</th><th>m. Gastrocnemius mg/g</th><th>m. Tibialis anterior mg/g</th><th>AT. Epididymal mg/g</th><th>AT. Inguinal mg/g</th><th>AT. Interscapular mg/g</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Genotype (Ge) <sup>2</sup></strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>HspB1<sup>+/+</sup> (n = 45)</td><td>23.20</td><td>6.71</td><td>9.74</td><td>85.93</td><td>5.64</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.87</td><td>0.31</td><td>1.29</td><td>0.79</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>Male (n = 25)</td><td>25.24</td><td>6.85</td><td>9.14</td><td>86.42</td><td>5.83</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.89</td><td>0.31</td><td>1.29</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.62</td></tr><tr><td>Female (n = 20)</td><td>20.64</td><td>6.53</td><td>10.50</td><td>85.32</td><td>5.39</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.32</td><td>/</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.69</td></tr><tr><td>HspB1<sup>-/-</sup> (n = 55)</td><td>22.0</td><td>6.59</td><td>9.22</td><td>86.66</td><td>5.40</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.89</td><td>0.35</td><td>1.21</td><td>0.75</td><td>0.60</td></tr><tr><td>Male (n = 33)</td><td>23.43</td><td>6.71</td><td>8.15</td><td>87.71</td><td>5.40</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.92</td><td>0.37</td><td>1.21</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.55</td></tr><tr><td>Female (n = 22)</td><td>19.84</td><td>6.41</td><td>10.84</td><td>85.08</td><td>5.39</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.32</td><td>/</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.67</td></tr><tr><td>P-value<sup>3</sup></td><td>*</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gender (G)</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Male (n = 58)</td><td>24.21</td><td>6.77</td><td>8.57</td><td>87.15</td><td>5.59</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.90</td><td>0.35</td><td>1.24</td><td>0.71</td><td>0.58</td></tr><tr><td>Female (n = 42)</td><td>20.22</td><td>6.46</td><td>10.68</td><td>85.20</td><td>5.39</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.85</td><td>0.32</td><td>/</td><td>0.85</td><td>0.68</td></tr><tr><td>P-value</td><td>***</td><td>**</td><td>**</td><td>*</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>/</td><td>**</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Age (A) <sup>4</sup></strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8 wk (n = 43)</td><td>19.59<sup>c</sup></td><td>6.36<sup>c</sup></td><td>7.75<sup>b</sup></td><td>88.06<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.80<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.07<sup>a,b</sup></td><td>0.88</td><td>0.37</td><td>0.87<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.67<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.58<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td>12 wk (n = 45)</td><td>23.03<sup>b</sup></td><td>6.61<sup>b</sup></td><td>7.95<sup>b</sup></td><td>87.65<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.44<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.074<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.90</td><td>0.32</td><td>1.18<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.67<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.53<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td>52 wk (n = 12)</td><td>31.25<sup>a</sup></td><td>7.71<sup>a</sup></td><td>21.23<sup>a</sup></td><td>75.17<sup>b</sup></td><td>4.80<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.065<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.83</td><td>0.29</td><td>3.13<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.46<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.11<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td>P-value</td><td>***</td><td>***</td><td>***</td><td>***</td><td>**</td><td>**</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>***</td><td>***</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Interactions</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ge x G</td><td>*</td><td>ns</td><td>*</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>/</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td>Ge x A</td><td>**</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td>G x A</td><td>***</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>/</td><td>**</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td>Ge x G x A</td><td>*</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>/</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td></tr></tbody></table>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158644.t002

total bilirubin (*P* < 0.05), calcium (*P* < 0.01) and iron (*P* < 0.05). The data showed a decrease in lipidic metabolites for the *HspB1*-null mouse. Significant age × gender × genotype interactions (*P* < 0.05) were also detected for glucose, total bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase (Table 3) indicating that the liver functions (probably lipogenesis and detoxification) has been likely affected by *HspB1* gene invalidation.

## Muscle changes associated with Hsp27 deficiency

**Muscle properties.** As illustrated in Table 2, the skeletal muscles analysed, whether oxidative or glycolytic types, showed no differences with respect to weights between *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> mice and wild-types. To investigate muscle phenotyping, we focused on 12-wk old adult males. Examination of fibre types (Fig 3) showed that the expression of MyHC isoforms, cross-sectional areas, shapes and perimeters of fibres did not differ between genotypes in the *Soleus* and *Tibialis anterior* muscles (Fig 3C–3F). However the frequency profiles of fibre sizes were different between genotypes, with a tendency to higher numbers of small fibres in the *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> mouse than wild-type for both *Soleus* and *Tibialis anterior* muscles (Fig 3A and 3B). SDH activity, an indicator of mitochondria content, revealed no obvious differences between the *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> mouse and wild-type mouse (data not shown). In the muscles of *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> mouse,

<footnote n="1">¹ Muscle weight, adipose tissues (AT) weight, Liver weight, Fat and Lean are relative to animal body weight.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup>: *HspB1*-null mouse; *HspB1*<sup>+/+</sup>: Wild type littermates.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Significance: *: *P* < 0.05; **: *P* < 0.01; ***: *P* < 0.001; ns: not significant.</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ LS-means with different superscripts (a, b, c) within a column for age effect are significantly different (*P* < 0.05).</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 2.** Influence of *HspB1* gene disruption on the growth and size of animals. (A) Evolution of body weight from 1 to 12 weeks of age. (B) Body weight at 8-wk, 12-wk, and 52-wk of age; *HspB1*^−/−: *HspB1*-null mice; *HspB1*^+/+: Wild type littermates; F: Females; M: Males. LS-means (± SD) with different superscripts (a, b, c, d, e) are significantly different (*P* < 0.05).</figcaption></figure>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158644.g002

expression of the *HspB1* promoter driven construction was found to be fibre-type specific (type IIB < type IIA < type I and IIX) (Fig 1 and data not shown). An adequate electrophoresis technique to quantify proportions of MyHC revealed distinct profiles between the *HspB1*^−/− mouse and the wild-type mouse in the m. *Soleus* (Fig 3G right panel). A third MyHC was detected in *HspB1*^−/− mice comparatively to their controls. As illustrated in Fig 3G (left panel) this MyHC could be similar to the developmental isoform detected at 4 weeks of age in the wild-type mouse. However, this could not be validated by immunohistochemistry likely because the fast antibody cross-reacted with developmental MyHC [27].

**Muscle ultrastructure.** To examine the in-depth phenotype of muscle, we performed electron microscopy of longitudinal muscle sections and measurements. Figs 4–6 illustrate changes in muscle ultrastructure following Hsp27 invalidation. Compared to the wild-type muscle (Fig 4A, 4C and 4E), the soleus muscle of the *HspB1*^−/− mouse (Fig 4B, 4D and 4F) showed increased intermyofibrillar spaces (Table 4) and altered sarcomere (longitudinally repeating subunit of myofibrils) structure with Z lines deformation, A band and I band junctions not well defined. The sarcomere length (1.70 µm ± 0.3) was not changed. The costamers were stretched (Fig 5B vs. 5A). Some disintegration of the lateral attachments between myofibrils and the sarcolemma were also observed (Fig 5B). The morphology of nuclei appeared to be normal. They were localized at the periphery of myofibrils (data not shown). There appeared to be no differences in mitochondria numbers between *HspB1*^−/− mice and controls (Fig 4C and 4D). However, an alteration was observed in the morphology of some mitochondria in *HspB1*^−/− muscles. Several fibres showed unaltered ultrastructure suggesting a high heterogeneity in the ultrastructure with altered and non-altered regions (Fig 4).

The ultrastructure of the m. *Tibialis anterior* in the mutant mouse is presented in Fig 6. Four fibre types (I, IIA, IIB and IIX) are observed. The oxidative fibres (Fig 6A, 6B, 6C and 6D) are characterized by a high content of mitochondria while glycolytic fibres (Fig 6E and 6F) are poor in mitochondria. Changes in m. *Tibialis anterior* ultrastructure were less marked than in the *Soleus* muscle. Glycolytic fibres showed very small intermyofibrillar spaces and their
<table><caption>Table 3. Influence of HspB1 gene disruption on the plasma chemistry parameters during postnatal growth.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Albumin<br>g/L</th><th>Transferrin<br>g/L</th><th>Alkaline<br>phosphatase<br>UI/L</th><th>Alanine<br>aminotransf.<br>UI/L</th><th>Aspartate<br>aminotransf.<br>UI/L</th><th>Total<br>bilirubin µmol/<br>L</th><th>Amylase<br>UI/L</th><th>Cholinesterase<br>UI/L</th><th>Creatine<br>Kinase<br>C UI/<br>L</th><th>Creatine<br>Kinase<br>MB, UI/L</th><th>Creatinine<br>UI/L</th><th>Uric<br>acid µmol/L</th><th>Urea<br>mmol/<br>L</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="14"><strong>A</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="14"><strong>Main effect</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="14"><strong>Genotype (Ge)<sup>1</sup></strong></td></tr><tr><td>HspB1<sup>+/+</sup> (n = 30)</td><td>27.0</td><td>1.01</td><td>124.52</td><td>41.51</td><td>105.7</td><td>1.24</td><td>2742.6</td><td>1452.8</td><td>439.5</td><td>396.6</td><td>21.86</td><td>78.86</td><td>9.84</td></tr><tr><td>Male (n = 18)</td><td>26.64</td><td>1.00</td><td>121.14</td><td>48.96</td><td>101.73</td><td>1.11</td><td>2914.14</td><td>1274.1</td><td>439.4</td><td>387.9</td><td>20.97</td><td>79.14</td><td>9.76</td></tr><tr><td>Female (n = 12)</td><td>27.54</td><td>1.02</td><td>153.29</td><td>30.33</td><td>111.62</td><td>1.42</td><td>2485.30</td><td>1721.0</td><td>439.7</td><td>409.6</td><td>23.20</td><td>78.45</td><td>9.97</td></tr><tr><td>HspB1<sup>-/-</sup> (n = 27)</td><td>26.63</td><td>1.00</td><td>119.25</td><td>43.10</td><td>107.4</td><td>1.48</td><td>2812.2</td><td>15.28.2</td><td>460.9</td><td>348.1</td><td>21.52</td><td>77.25</td><td>9.40</td></tr><tr><td>Male (n = 15)</td><td>26.29</td><td>1.01</td><td>116.49</td><td>55.70</td><td>101.53</td><td>1.63B</td><td>2986.60</td><td>1320.5</td><td>368.9</td><td>351.9</td><td>21.35</td><td>71.69</td><td>8.80</td></tr><tr><td>Female (n = 12)</td><td>27.05</td><td>0.99</td><td>134.77</td><td>27.35</td><td>114.68</td><td>1.29</td><td>2594.33</td><td>1787.7</td><td>575.8</td><td>343.5</td><td>21.74</td><td>84.19</td><td>10.14</td></tr><tr><td colspan="14"><strong>P-value<sup>2</sup></strong></td></tr><tr><td>Gender (G)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Male (n = 33)</td><td>26.5</td><td>1.01</td><td>106.63</td><td>52.02</td><td>101.64</td><td>1.35</td><td>2947.1</td><td>1295.2</td><td>507.8</td><td>371.5</td><td>21.14</td><td>75.75</td><td>9.33</td></tr><tr><td>Female (n = 24)</td><td>27.3</td><td>1.00</td><td>137.15</td><td>28.84</td><td>113.15</td><td>1.35</td><td>2539.8</td><td>17.54.3</td><td>407.4</td><td>376.5</td><td>22.50</td><td>81.32</td><td>10.06</td></tr><tr><td colspan="14"><strong>P-value</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Age (A)<sup>3</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8 wk (n = 24)</td><td>26.40</td><td>0.98</td><td>169.07<sup>a</sup></td><td>22.1<sup>b</sup></td><td>104.5<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.27</td><td>2608.5<sup>b</sup></td><td>1295.7<sup>c</sup></td><td>542</td><td>408.5</td><td>21.41</td><td>75.78</td><td>9.41<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td>12 wk (n = 21)</td><td>27.16</td><td>1.04</td><td>112.90<sup>b</sup></td><td>35.14<sup>b</sup></td><td>94.90<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.43</td><td>2677.7<sup>b</sup></td><td>1527.1<sup>b</sup></td><td>426</td><td>318.9</td><td>23.54</td><td>79.89</td><td>9.09<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td>52 wk (n = 12)</td><td>27.13</td><td>1.00</td><td>79.40<sup>c</sup></td><td>95.02<sup>a</sup></td><td>130.8<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.36</td><td>3281.1<sup>a</sup></td><td>1806.5<sup>a</sup></td><td>486</td><td>397.7</td><td>19.07</td><td>79.58</td><td>11.04<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td colspan="14"><strong>P-value</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Interactions</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ge x G</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>***</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td>Ge x A</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>*</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>**</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>G x A</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>**</td><td>**</td><td>**</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>Ge x G x A</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>*</td><td>**</td><td>**</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td colspan="14"><strong>B</strong></td></tr><tr><td colspan="14"><strong>Main effect</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Genotype (Ge)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>HspB1<sup>+/+</sup> (n = 30)</td><td>26.71</td><td>0.81</td><td>2.59</td><td>2.28</td><td>12.32</td><td>6308.1</td><td>1042.4</td><td>169.4</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.69</td><td>0.22</td><td>1.10</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Male (n = 18)</td><td>26.94</td><td>0.79</td><td>2.66</td><td>2.30</td><td>12.42</td><td>6459.8</td><td>1047.3</td><td>167.6</td><td>2.57</td><td>1.86</td><td>0.19</td><td>1.23</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Female (n = 12)</td><td>26.38</td><td>0.85</td><td>2.49</td><td>2.24</td><td>12.18</td><td>6082.2</td><td>1035.1</td><td>172.2</td><td>2.05</td><td>1.44</td><td>0.27</td><td>0.90</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>HspB1<sup>-/-</sup> (n = 27)</td><td>23.71</td><td>0.80</td><td>2.75</td><td>2.04</td><td>11.69</td><td>6020.1</td><td>884.5</td><td>153.9</td><td>2.08</td><td>1.49</td><td>0.21</td><td>0.91</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Male (n = 15)</td><td>22.69</td><td>0.77</td><td>2.85</td><td>2.06</td><td>11.80</td><td>6220.1</td><td>936.8</td><td>159.7</td><td>2.25</td><td>1.68</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.87</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Female (n = 12)</td><td>24.99</td><td>0.84</td><td>2.63</td><td>2.00</td><td>11.54</td><td>5771.9</td><td>819.0</td><td>146.8</td><td>1.86</td><td>1.27</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.95</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="14"><strong>P-value</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Gender (G)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Male (n = 33)</td><td>25.00</td><td>0.78</td><td>2.74</td><td>2.19</td><td>12.14</td><td>6351</td><td>997.1</td><td>164</td><td>2.42</td><td>1.76</td><td>0.18</td><td>1.07</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Female (n = 24)</td><td>25.70</td><td>0.85</td><td>2.56</td><td>2.12</td><td>11.86</td><td>5927</td><td>927.1</td><td>160</td><td>1.96</td><td>1.35</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.92</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="14"><strong>P-value</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Age (A)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8 wk (n = 24)</td><td>26.40</td><td>0.81</td><td>2.94<sup>a</sup></td><td>2.20</td><td>12.86<sup>a</sup></td><td>6073.3<sup>b</sup></td><td>891.2<sup>b</sup></td><td>153.12</td><td>2.20</td><td>1.57</td><td>0.25<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.99<sup>b</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>12 wk (n = 21)</td><td>24.50</td><td>0.80</td><td>2.64<sup>b</sup></td><td>2.07</td><td>12.10<sup>a</sup></td><td>5529.2<sup>b</sup></td><td>926.4<sup>b</sup></td><td>150.63</td><td>2.22</td><td>1.62</td><td>0.21<sup>a,b</sup></td><td>0.88<sup>b</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>52 wk (n = 12)</td><td>24.64</td><td>0.83</td><td>2.17<sup>c</sup></td><td>2.24</td><td>10.28<sup>b</sup></td><td>7496.2<sup>a</sup></td><td>1192.4<sup>a</sup></td><td>200.12</td><td>2.28</td><td>1.60</td><td>0.16<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.24<sup>a</sup></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="14"><strong>P-value</strong></td></tr></tbody></table>

(Continued)
<table><caption>**Table 3.** (Continued)</caption><thead><tr><th colspan="10">Interactions</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Ge x G</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>Ge x A</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>**</td><td>ns</td><td>**</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td>G x A</td><td>ns</td><td>*</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>**</td><td>ns</td></tr><tr><td>Ge x G x A</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>*</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td></tr></tbody></table>

Abbreviation: aminotransf: aminotransferase; dehyd: dehydrogenase

¹ *HspB1*<sup>1</sup>·: *HspB1*-null mouse; *HspB1*<sup>++</sup>: Wild type littermates.

² Significance: *: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01; ***: P < 0.001; ns: not significant.

³ LS-means with different superscripts (a, b, c) within a column for age effect are significantly different (P < 0.05).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158644.t003
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 3.** Influence of *HspB1* gene invalidation on muscle fibre characteristics. (A, B) Frequency profiles of muscle fibre cross sectional area at 12 weeks of age in the m. *Soleus* (A) and the m. *Tibialis anterior* (B). (C-F) Myosin heavy chain (MyHC) immunostaining in the m. *Soleus* (C, D, BAD5 staining) and m. *Tibialis anterior* (E, F, BF-F3 immuno-staining) at 12 weeks of age. (C, E) wild type controls; (D, F) *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> mice. Fibre types: I, slow oxidative fibre; IIA and IIX, fast oxido-glycolytic fibre; IIB, fast glycolytic fibre. Scale bar: 50 µm; (G) electrophoretic separation of MyHC at 3 ages in wild type controls (*HspB1*<sup>+/+</sup>) and *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> mutant mice.</figcaption></figure>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158644.g003

ultrastructure was apparently not affected in the mutant mouse. *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> oxidative fibres exhibited larger space between myofibrils than controls (Table 4). Lastly *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> fibres showed more altered mitochondria.

**Discussion**

Small heat shock proteins (sHsps) play a fundamental role in multiple organisms through pleiotropic and more specific effects [28]. They are tightly regulated during development [17]. To investigate the role of constitutive Hsp27 *in vivo*, we generated a mouse strain carrying targeted invalidation of the *HspB1* gene. We examined the consequences of Hsp27 deficiency on the broad phenotype of mutant mouse, and specifically on muscle development and fine characteristics. The final objective was to look for molecular mechanisms regulated by Hsp27 that could account for muscle development, structure, and physiology.

The invalidation of *HspB1* appeared to have only a moderate effect on the development and physiology since the mutant mice were viable, fertile and apparently normal offspring were generated. Since Hsp27 is constitutively present in a wide variety of tissues as part of the chaperone network, the occurrence of a moderate phenotype in the *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> mouse was quite unexpected. Observation of *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> mice over a period of 12 months did not reveal any signs of major morphological or physiological disturbance nor locomotion troubles or disease including neuropathy as predicted by Kim *et al.* [29]. Thus, Hsp27 on its own did not appear to be essential for development as also reported in mouse [30–32], fly [33], and zebrafish [34] but in contrast to a study by Eroglu *et al.* [35]. The moderate phenotype of the *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> mouse
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 4.** The loosely ultrastructure of the Soleus muscle associated with invalidation of Hsp27. (A, C, and E): *HspB1*<sup>+/+</sup> (Wild type control); (B, D, and F): *HspB1*<sup>-/-</sup> (*HspB1*-null mouse). Fi: muscle fibre, ECS: extra cellular space, My: Myofibril, EMyS: Extramyofibrillar space, Mi: Mitochondria, Sr: Sarcomere, A: A band, I: I band.</figcaption></figure>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158644.g004
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 5.** Details of the ultrastructure of *Soleus* muscle of the *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mouse. Desmin lateral attachments between myofibrils to the sarcolemma are shown in the *HspB1*-null mouse. (A) Well defined sarcolemma in the wild type control; (B) disintegration of the lateral attachments between myofibrils to the sarcolemma. Fi: muscle fibre, My: Myofibril, Mi: Mitochondria, C: Costamers, D: Desmin Filaments, S: Sarcolemma, EMys: Extramyofibrillar space.</figcaption></figure>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158644.g005

indicates that the mutant has coped with the loss of Hsp27. This may be have been achieved through compensatory changes in the expression of cognate members of the sHsp family [2] sharing common functions with Hsp27 and transcriptionally regulated by HSF-1. Compensation which may be elicited by other small Hsps has probably occurred during early development and postnatal life. Consistently we previously reported changes in the status of sHsps in the muscles of the *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mouse [36, 37] that may support functional redundancy. However we report here specific characteristics of the *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mouse: a gender dimorphism with marked effects in males, an effect on body weight with no obvious changes in the growth rate, a lower plasma lipids profile, and an alteration of muscle ultrastructure. These gender differences agree with previous reports that the heat shock induction of *HspB1* is greater in males [38] and that Hsp27 regulates the activity [39] and expression [40] of the androgen receptor which plays a role in testosterone-related myogenesis [41].

Although Hsp27 is expressed at the highest levels of any tissues in muscle in basal condition [8], there was no specific apparent macroscopic or microscopic muscle phenotype associated with Hsp27 loss. There was no main impact of *HspB1* disruption neither on the relative weight of muscles nor on the size or types of muscle fibres. Similar observations were made in other vertebrate models, at the exception of the zebrafish for which Hsp27 was essential for optimal growth of craniofacial myofibres [34]. However, as we examined animals only postnatally we cannot exclude that the muscles of the mutant mouse could have developed slower than those of wild-type during foetal development. Interestingly, very specific differences between mutants and wild-type controls were detected at the protein level [37]. The electrophoretic profiles of m. *Soleus* proteins showed differences in myofibrillar proteins, especially the presence of a putative developmental MyHC isoform which remains to be confirmed. These differences may be explained by differences in the kinetics of myofibrillar protein expression between the *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mutant and the wild-type mouse during myogenesis. Thus they probably illustrate a
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 6.** Ultrastructure of the *Tibialis anterior* muscle of the *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mouse. (A, C, and E): *HspB1*⁺/⁺ (Wild type mouse); (B, D, and F): *HspB1*⁻/⁻ (*HspB1*-null mouse). My: Myofibril. Arrows: Altered mitochondria. (A, B, C, D): oxidative fibres characterized by high mitochondria content, (E, F) glycolytic fibres with small amount of mitochondria.</figcaption></figure>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158644.g006

slower development of mutant muscles as suggested above. Accordingly, the higher number of small fibres in the *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mouse may result from delayed muscle growth.

Most striking is the ultrastructure alteration of the skeletal muscles in the *HspB1*⁻/⁻ mouse. As a result of transgenic insertion to disrupt *HspB1* gene expression, introduction of *LacZ* gene via the targeting vector produces constitutive beta galactosidase expression. Albeit in the
<table><caption>Table 4. Influence of *HspB1* gene disruption on muscle ultrastructure.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="2">Genotype (Ge) <sup>1</sup></th><th colspan="2">Gender (G)</th><th colspan="2">Muscle (M)</th><th rowspan="2">SEM <sup>3</sup></th><th colspan="8">Significance <sup>2</sup></th></tr><tr><th>HspB1<sup>+/+</sup></th><th>HspB1<sup>-/-</sup></th><th>Female</th><th>Male</th><th>m. Soleus</th><th>m. Tibialis anterior</th><th>Ge</th><th>G</th><th>M</th><th>Ge x G</th><th>Ge x M</th><th>G x M</th><th>Ge x G x M</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Average width of the intermyofibrillar spaces <sup>4</sup> (nm)</td><td>227.5 (14.11)</td><td>275.2 (19.74)</td><td>200.7 (11.43)</td><td>302.0 (18.48)</td><td>284.0 (20.50)</td><td>218.7 (14.81)</td><td>12.22</td><td>*</td><td>***</td><td>**</td><td>**</td><td>***</td><td>**</td><td>**</td></tr><tr><td>Percentage occupied by the intermyofibrillar spaces (nm)</td><td>21.3 (0.91)</td><td>24.7 (1.42)</td><td>19.2 (0.89)</td><td>26.8 (1.20)</td><td>25.0 (1.68)</td><td>21.0 (0.91)</td><td>0.85</td><td>**</td><td>***</td><td>**</td><td>***</td><td>***</td><td>**</td><td>***</td></tr><tr><td>Average width of the myofibrils (nm)</td><td>770.0 (24.53)</td><td>754.7 (19.64)</td><td>754.3 (20.46)</td><td>770.4 (23.25)</td><td>814.5 (30.16)</td><td>710.2 (16.01)</td><td>15.60</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td><td>***</td><td>***</td><td>*</td><td>ns</td><td>ns</td></tr></tbody></table>

The measurements were performed in 480 electron microscopy fields.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158644.t004

absence of substrate at the optimal pH *in situ*, this may be expected to compromise development or structure of tissues and organs. *LacZ* is broadly used as a reporter gene in transgenic studies with not any dedicated effect nor demonstrated cytotoxicity of beta galactosidase even after long term expression. Overexpression of this enzyme following injection or transgenic expression was demonstrated by immunocytochemistry in several studies while not any obvious change was detected in the heart and muscle cell ultrastructure *in vivo* [42–46]. However this does not disprove an effect of the *LacZ* reporter in the muscle ultrastructure in the *HspB1* mouse but makes it very unlikely. We rather assume that change in muscle ultrastructure is a consequence of *HspB1* invalidation. Indeed *sHspS* are important in maintaining cytoskeletal integrity [28, 47]. Especially during intense exercise and associated hyperthermia, high levels of *sHspS* are needed to prevent cellular damage in skeletal muscles [30]. *Hsp27* interacts with key cytoskeletal protein elements and is associated with Z-disk maintenance [48]. This has been described at the level of microfilaments and intermediate filaments [49]. Under excise damage *Hsp27* and αB-crystallin translocate from the intermyofibrillar space to the cytoskeletal/myofibrillar structures after a repeated bout of exercise [50]. They accumulate in myofibrillar structures, especially in the Z-line and intermediate filament structures, and in areas of disrupted sarcomeres. Cytoplasmic *Hsp27* is thought to interact primarily with actin microfilaments [51], while cytoplasmic αB-crystallin appears most frequently to interact with intermediate filament proteins e.g. desmin [49]. Thus *Hsp27* likely modulates stability, structure and dynamics of actin filaments [52]. In Zebrafish, localization of *Hsp27* in resting length myofibrils correlates with regions adjacent to the Z-line. However in stretched myofibrils *Hsp27* localization does not depend on desmin, α-actinin, myosin, or filamentous actin, but is connected with titin filaments [47]. A fine control of muscle architecture is of paramount importance during muscle development and myoblast differentiation, or when facing excessive damage. In *Xenopus* embryos lacking *Hsp27* after morpholino injection, defects in myofibril architecture were observed in heart and skeletal muscle [53]. There were evidences of failure of myofibril assembly and sarcomere formation. Thus, the primary function of *Hsp27* may be the regulation of myofibril structure. In our gene knock-out study, constitutive loss of *Hsp27* also resulted in myofibril ultrastructural abnormalities in basal conditions as shown by disturbances in the cross-striation band pattern, deformation of myofibrillar structures, enlarged intermyofibrillar space, presence of some distorted mitochondria, and grouping of subsarcolemal mitochondria. Several hypotheses can be formulated to account for the muscle ultrastructural phenotype of

<footnote n="1">¹ *HspB1*<sup>+/-</sup>: *HspB1*-null mouse; *HspB1*<sup>+/-</sup>: Wild type littermates.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Significance: *: *P* < 0.05; **: *P* < 0.01; ***: *P* < 0.001; ns: not significant.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ SEM: standard error of the mean.</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ LS-means (± SD).</footnote>
the *HspB1* mutant mouse including misfolded proteins (loss of protective function through protein triage [54]), abnormal myofibrillogenesis and disorganization / loss of costameric proteins (e.g desmin) (loss of protective function from fragmentation) in the absence of Hsp27. Moreover, the alterations observed may be linked to altered maintenance of muscle homeostasis and activation of proteolysis through different mechanisms including proteolytic systems, apoptosis, proteasomal or autophagosomal protein degradation [55]. Interestingly, the specific phenotype of mutant muscle was associated with a lower abundance of desmin (a potential substrate of the calpain system and of caspase 3) and changes in the abundance of others proteins involved in muscle structure [36].

Since (i) under physiological conditions Hsp27 loss does not impair mouse development and physiology and (ii) the protein is stress-inducible, the phenotype of mouse is questioned under stress conditions. Indeed, the analysis of Hsp27 deficient muscle in stress conditions (exercise or hyperthermic challenge) will provide key elements on the function of Hsp27 and its interactors during pre- and post-natal development. This has been partly examined by Huang et al [56] who did not detect any change in the levels of several Hsps following hyperthermic challenge. However, as stated by these authors multiple sHsp targeted disruption might be helpful for further understanding of Hsps functional redundancy in mouse development.

**Conclusions**

Overall, this study showed that mouse development and morphometric characteristics of their skeletal muscles were not impaired in the absence of the *HspB1* gene. These data suggest a functional redundancy between Hsps during development with subsequent apparently normal phenotype. However, the invalidation of the *HspB1* gene resulted in alteration of muscle ultrastructure. Therefore redundancy was not detected at ultrastructural levels suggesting a crucial role for Hsp27 in the regulation of protein make-up for muscle ultrastructure.

**Supporting Information**

**S1 Dataset. Individual zootechnical and metabolic parameters of HspB1 mice and their control littermates.**

(XLS)

**Acknowledgments**

The authors thank F. Guillou for helpful scientific discussions. We thank the Plateau de Biologie Expérimentale de la Souris (AniRA-PBES) of the UMS344/US8 SFR Biosciences for transgenic mouse production., G. Gentes, C. Barboiron, V. Largeau, N. Allegre, and J. Hermet for technical support for animal handling, sample collection and analysis, C. Szepaniack for electronic microscopy samples preparation, and A. Delavaud, for measurement of ultrastructure parameters.

**Author Contributions**

**Conceived and designed the experiments:** ICM BP.

**Performed the experiments:** DA MK MB TA VB.

**Analyzed the data:** MG.

**Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools:** DA MK.

**Wrote the paper:** ICM MK BP TA MG DA MB VB.
Advised on experimental design: MB DA. Supervised the analysis of whole data: ICM BP.
Coordinated the redaction of the manuscript: ICM BP.

## References

1. Kampinga HH, Hageman J, Vos MJ, Kubota H, Tanguay RM, Bruford EA, et al. Guidelines for the nomenclature of the human heat shock proteins. Cell Stress & Chaperones. 2009; 14(1):105-11. doi: 10.1007/s12192-008-0068-7. WOS:000261177600010.

2. Fontaine JM, Sun XK, Benndorf R, Welsh MJ. Interactions of HSP22 (HSPB8) with HSP20, alpha B-crystallin, and HSPB3. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2005; 337(3):1006-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.09.148. WOS:000232910300035. PMID: 16225851

3. Arrigo AP, Suhan JP, Welch WJ. Dynamic changes in the structure and intracellular locale of the mammalian low-molecular-weight heat shock protein. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1988; 8(12):5059-71. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5059 PMID: 3072471

4. Landry J, Lambert H, Zhou M, Lavoie JN, Hickey E, Weber LA, et al. Human HSP27 is phosphorylated at serines 78 and 82 by heat shock and mitogen-activated kinases that recognize the same amino acid motif as S6 kinase II. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1992; 267(2):794-803. PMID: 1730670

5. Garrido C, Brunet M, Didelot C, Zermati Y, Schmitt E, Kroemer G. Heat shock proteins 27 and 70. Cell Cycle. 2006; 5(22):2592-601. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.22.3448. WOS:000242897600011. PMID: 17106261

6. Kargul J, Laurent GJ. Small heat shock proteins: Molecular protectors against the disease. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2012; 44(10):1587-. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.06.022. WOS:000307801700001.

7. Vidyasagar A, Wilson NA, Djamali A. Heat shock protein 27 (HSP27): biomarker of disease and therapeutic target. Fibrogenesis & tissue repair. 2012; 5(1):7. Epub 2012/05/09. doi: 10.1186/1755-1536-5-7. 22564335; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3464729.

8. Neufer PD, Benjamin IJ. Differential Expression of alpha B-Crystallin and Hsp27 in Skeletal Muscle during Continuous Contractile Activity. Relationship to myogenic regulatory factors. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996; 271(39):24089-95. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.39.24089 PMID: 8798647

9. Welch WJ. Mammalian stress response: cell physiology, structure/function of stress proteins, and implications for medicine and disease. 1992; 72(4):1063-81.

10. Morton J, Kayani A, McArdle A, Drust B. The Exercise-Induced Stress Response of Skeletal Muscle, with Specific Emphasis on Humans. Sports Med. 2009; 39(8):643-62. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200939080-00003 PMID: 19769414

11. Huey K, Hilliard CA, Hunt CR. Effect of HSP25 Loss on Muscle Contractile Function and Running Wheel Activity in Young and Old Mice. Frontiers in Physiology. 2013; 4. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00398

12. Cobley JN, Sakellariou GK, Owens DJ, Murray S, Waldron S, Gregson W, et al. Lifelong training preserves some redox-regulated adaptive responses after an acute exercise stimulus in aged human skeletal muscle. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2014; 70(0):23-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.02.004.

13. Folkesson M, Mackey AL, Langberg H, Oskarsson E, Piehl-Aulin K, Henriksson J, et al. The expression of heat shock protein in human skeletal muscle: effects of muscle fibre phenotype and training background. Acta Physiologica. 2013; 209(1):26-33. doi: 10.1111/apha.12124 PMID: 23710799

14. Paulsen G, Lauritzen F, Bayer ML, Kalhovde JM, Ugelstad I, Ove SG, et al. Subcellular movement and expression of HSP27, αB-crystallin, and HSP70 after two bouts of eccentric exercise in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2009; 107(2):570-82. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00209.2009 PMID: 19498098

15. Koh TJ, Escobedo J. Cytoskeletal disruption and small heat shock protein translocation immediately after lengthening contractions. American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology. 2004; 286(3):C713-C22. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00341.2003 PMID: 14627610

16. Liu HY, Lundh T, Dicksved J, Lindberg JE. Expression of heat shock protein 27 in gut tissue of growing pigs fed diets without and with inclusion of chicory fiber. Journal of Animal Science. 2012; 90:25-7. doi: 10.2527/jas53724. WOS:000319673100009. PMID: 23365273

17. Morrow G, Tanguay RM. Small heat shock protein expression and functions during development. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2012; 44(10):1613-21. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.03.009. WOS:000307801700004.

18. Magnol L, Monestier O, Vuillier-Devillers K, Wagner S, Cocquempot O, Chevallier MC, et al. A sensitised mutagenesis screen in the mouse to explore the bovine genome: study of muscle characteristics. animal. 2011; 5(05):663-71. doi: 10.1017/S1751731110002405
19. Kammoun M, Cassar-Malek I, Meunier B, Picard B. A reliable immunohistochemical classification of skeletal muscle fibres in mice. European Journal of Histochemistry. 2014; 58(2). Epub 2014 june 24.

20. Meunier B, Picard B, Astruc T, Labas R. Development of image analysis tool for the classification of muscle fibre type using immunohistochemical staining. Histochem Cell Biol. 2010; 134(3):307-17. doi: 10.1007/s00418-010-0733-7. WOS:000281249500008. PMID: 20711601

21. Ashmore C, Parker W, Stokes H, Doerr L. Comparative aspects of muscle fibre types in fetuses of the normal and double muscled cattle. Growth. 1974; 38:501-6. PMID: 4282366

22. Picard B, Barboiron C, Chadeyron D, Jurie C. Protocol for high-resolution electrophoresis separation of myosin heavy chain isoforms in bovine skeletal muscle. Electrophoresis. 2011; 32(14):1804-6. Epub 2011/06/21. doi: 10.1002/elps.201100118 PMID: 21688279.

23. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry. 1976; 72(1/2):248-54. CABI:19761445771.

24. Chaze T, Meunier B, Chambon C, Jurie C, Picard B. In vivo proteome dynamics during early bovine myogenesis. PROTEOMICS. 2008; 8(20):4236-48. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200701101 PMID: 18924180

25. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227(5259):680-5. Epub 1970/08/15. PMID: 5432063.

26. Peca J, Feliciano C, Ting JT, Wang W, Wells MF, Venkatraman TN, et al. Shank3 mutant mice display autistic-like behaviours and striatal dysfunction. Nature. 2011; 472(7344):437-42. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v472/n7344/abs/10.1038-nature09965-unlocked.html#supplementary-information. doi: 10.1038/nature09965 PMID: 21423165

27. Picard B, Duris MP, Jurie C. Classification of bovine muscle fibres by different histochemical techniques. Histochem J. 1998; 30(7):473-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1003207922944. WOS:000074954000003.

28. Bakthisaran R, Tangirala R, Rao CM. Small heat shock proteins: Role in cellular functions and pathology. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Proteins and Proteomics. 2015; 1854(4):291-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bkapap.2014.12.019.

29. Kim M, Geum D, Khang I, Park YM, Kang BM, Lee KA, et al. Expression pattern of HSP25 in mouse preimplantation embryo: Heat shock responses during oocyte maturation. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2002; 61(1):3-13. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1125. WOS:000172558900002. PMID: 11774370

30. Huang L, Min JN, Masters S, Mivechi NF, Moskophidis D. Insights into function and regulation of small heat shock protein 25 (HSPB1) in a mouse model with targeted gene disruption. Genesis. 2007; 45 (8):487-501. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20319. WOS:000249911300003. PMID: 17661394

31. Crowe J, Aubareda A, McNamee K, Przybycien PM, Lu X, Williams RO, et al. Heat Shock Protein B1-Deficient Mice Display Impaired Wound Healing. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(10):e77383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077383. PMC3797036. PMID: 24143227

32. consortium Imp. https://www mousephenotype org/ 2015.

33. Hao X, Zhang S, Timakov B, Zhang P. The Hsp27 gene is not required for Drosophila development but its activity is associated with starvation resistance. Cell Stress & Chaperones. 2007; 12(4):364-72. PMC2134798.

34. Middleton RC, Shelden EA. Small heat shock protein HSPB1 regulates growth of embryonic zebrafish craniofacial muscles. Experimental Cell Research. 2013; 319(6):860-74. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.01.002. WOS:000316374600009. PMID: 23313812

35. Eroglu B, Min J-N, Zhang Y, Szurek E, Moskophidis D, Eroglu A, et al. An Essential Role for Heat Shock Transcription Factor Binding Protein 1 (HSBP1) During Early Embryonic Development. Development biology. 2014; 386(2):448-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.12.038. PMC4114229. PMID: 24380799

36. Kammoun M, Picard B, Henry-Berger J, Cassar-Malek I. A network-based approach for predicting Hsp27 knock-out targets Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 2013; 6(7):e201303008.

37. Picard B, Kammoun M, Gagaoua M, Barboiron C, Meunier B, Chambon C, et al. Calcium Homeostasis and Muscle Energy Metabolism Are Modified in HspB1-Null Mice. Proteomes. 2016; 4(2):17. doi: 10.3390/proteomes4020017

38. Morrow G, Hightower LE, Tanguay RM. Small heat shock proteins: big folding machines. Cell Stress and Chaperones. 2014; 20(2):207-12. doi: 10.1007/s12192-014-0561-0 PMID: 25536931

39. Zoubeidi A, Zardan A, Beraldi E, Fazli L, Sowery R, Rennie P, et al. Cooperative interactions between androgen receptor (AR) and heat-shock protein 27 facilitate AR transcriptional activity. Cancer research. 2007; 67(21):10455-65. Epub 2007/11/03. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2057. PMID: 17974989

40. Stope MB, Schubert T, Staar D, Ronnau C, Streitborger A, Kroeger N, et al. Effect of the heat shock protein HSP27 on androgen receptor expression and function in prostate cancer cells. World Journal of
Urology. 2012; 30(3):327-31. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0843-z. WOS:000304558800008. PMID: 22362414

41. Zhang Q, Lee HG, Han JA, Kang SK, Lee NK, Baik M, et al. Differentially expressed proteins associated with myogenesis and adipogenesis in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue between bulls and steers. Molecular Biology Reports. 2012; 39(2):953-60. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-0821-3. WOS:000298751300022. PMID: 21594731

42. Fuoco C, Rizzi R, Biondo A, Longa E, Mascaro A, Shapira-Schweitzer K, et al. In vivo generation of a mature and functional artificial skeletal muscle. EMBO Molecular Medicine. 2015; 7(4):411-22. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201404062 PMID: 25715804

43. Hoofnagle MH, Neppl RL, Berzin EL, Teg Pipes GC, Olson EN, Wamhoff BW, et al. Myocardin is differentially required for the development of smooth muscle cells and cardiomyocytes. AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2011; 300(5):H1707-H21. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01192.2010

44. MacKenzie TC, Kobinger GP, Louboutin J-P, Radu A, Javazon EH, Sena-Esteves M, et al. Transduction of satellite cells after prenatal intramuscular administration of lentiviral vectors. The Journal of Gene Medicine. 2005; 7(1):50-8. doi: 10.1002/jgm.649 PMID: 15515139

45. Miana-Mena FJ, Roux S, Benichou JC, Osta R, Brulet P. Neuronal activity-dependent membrane traffic at the neuromuscular junction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002; 99(5):3234-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052023599

46. Pappas CT, Mayfield RM, Henderson C, Jamilpour N, Cover C, Hernandez Z, et al. Knockout of Lmod2 results in shorter thin filaments followed by dilated cardiomyopathy and juvenile lethality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015; 112(44):13573-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508273112

47. Tucker NR, Shelden EA. Hsp27 associates with the titin filament system in heat-shocked zebrafish cardiomyocytes. Experimental Cell Research. 2009; 315(18):3176-86. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.06.030. WOS:000271178700010. PMID: 19580808

48. Dubińska-Magiera M, Jabłońska J, Saczko J, Kulbacka J, Jagla T, Daczewska M. Contribution of small heat shock proteins to muscle development and function. FEBS Letters. 2014; 588(4):517-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.01.005. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.01.005 PMID: 24440355

49. Perng MD, Cairns L, van den Ijssel P, Prescott A, Hutcheson AM, Quinlan RA. Intermediate filament interactions can be altered by HSP27 and alpha B-crystallin. Journal of Cell Science. 1999; 112 (13):2099-112. WOS:000081603500005.

50. Paulsen G, Lauritzen F, Bayer ML, Kalhovde JM, Ugelstad I, Ove SG, et al. Subcellular movement and expression of HSP27, alpha beta-crystallin, and HSP70 after two bouts of eccentric exercise in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2009; 107(2):570-82. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00209.2009. WOS:000268500200027. PMID: 19498098

51. Mounier N, Arrigo AP. Actin cytoskeleton and small heat shock proteins: how do they interact? Cell Stress & Chaperones. 2002; 7(2):167-76. WOS:000180194000006.

52. Guay J, Lambert H, GingrasBreton G, Lavoie JN, Huot J, Landry J. Regulation of actin filament dynamics by p38 map kinase-mediated phosphorylation of heat shock protein 27. Journal of Cell Science. 1997; 110:357-68. WOS:A1997WJ70000008. PMID: 9057088

53. Brown DD, Christine KS, Showell C, Conlon FL. Small heat shock protein hsp27 is required for proper heart tube formation. Genesis. 2007; 45(11):667-78. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20340. WOS:000251636300002. PMID: 17987658

54. Garrido C, Paul C, Seigneuric R, Kampinga HH. The small heat shock proteins family: The long forgotten chaperones. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2012; 44(10):1588-92. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.02.022. WOS:000307801700002.

55. Acunzo J, Katsogiannou M, Rocchi P. Small heat shock proteins HSP27 (HspB1), alpha B-crystallin (HspB5) and HSP22 (HspB8) as regulators of cell death. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2012; 44(10):1622-31. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.04.002. WOS:000307801700005.

56. Huang L, Min J-N, Masters S, Mivechi NF, Moskophidis D. Insights into function and regulation of small heat shock protein 25 (HSPB1) in a mouse model with targeted gene disruption. genesis. 2007; 45 (8):487-501. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20319. http://wwwjacobslab.org/ PMID: 17661394