<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

HAL
open science

# Differences Between Normal and Malignant Tissues of Stomach Cancer On a Molecular Level

Douglas Vessy

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Douglas Vessy. Differences Between Normal and Malignant Tissues of Stomach Cancer On a Molecular Level. Cellular & Molecular Medicine: Open access, 2021, Differences Between Normal and Malignant Tissues of Stomach Cancer On a Molecular Level, 7 (6). [https://hal.science/hal-04032200](https://hal.science/hal-04032200)

HAL Id: hal-04032200

https://hal.science/hal-04032200

Submitted on 16 Mar 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Differences Between Normal and Malignant Tissues of Stomach Cancer On a Molecular Level

## Abstract

It would be critical in the research of stomach cancer to be able to define the distinctions between normal and malignant tissues at a molecular level. Expression profiling of 86 tissues on 17K complementary DNA microarrays was used to study the gene expression pattern in the two kinds of gastric cancer tissues. A class classification technique was used to find differentially expressed genes. To choose predictors, samples were separated into two groups: training (n = 58) and test (n = 28). A t-test was utilised to pick a group of 894 genes in a training set, which were then used for cross-validation and class (normal or tumour) prediction in the test set. PBDs are a complex set of autosomal recessive illnesses that are divided into two clinically different subtypes: the Zellweger syndrome spectrum (ZSS) disorders and rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata (RCDP) type 1. Defects in any of at least 14 distinct PEX genes, which encode proteins involved in peroxisome formation and proliferation, are the cause of PBDs. Real-time RT-PCR may be used to confirm the expression ratios of the 5 genes picked from microarray data over 6 tissue samples, resulting in a high level of correlation, either alone or in combination. When a representative predictor set of 92 genes was examined, the pathways of 'focal adhesion' (with gene components of THBS2, PDGFD, MAPK1, COL1A2, COL6A3), 'ECM-receptor interaction' (THBS2, COL1A2, COL6A3, FN1), and 'TGF-beta signalling' (THBS2, MAPK1, INHBA) represented some of the major molecular differences.

**Received:** November 11, 2021, **Accepted:** November 24, 2021, **Published:** November 30, 2021

**Douglas Vessy***

Editorial Office, Cellular & Molecular
Medicine, Germany

*Corresponding author: Douglas Vessy

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

douglas@medicine.edu

Editorial Office, Cellular & Molecular
Medicine, Germany

**Citation:** Vessy D (2021) Differences Between Normal and Malignant Tissues of Stomach Cancer On a Molecular Level. Cell Mol Med. Vol. 7 No. 6: 30.

## Introduction

As a result, more objective molecular techniques to assessing stomach carcinogenesis and prognosis are required. Recent genomic tool applications have yielded a wealth of data on the differential gene expression patterns associated with stomach cancer. These include gene expression profiling of gastric carcinoma cell lines using oligonucleotide or cDNA microarrays, identification of gastric cancer metastasis-related genes, and the selection of differentially expressed gene sets that can distinguish between normal and cancerous gastric tissues, or between gastric cancer subtypes. Identify the gene abnormalities that are causing the problem. PEX cDNA transfection complementation tests, followed by sequencing of the resulting PEX genes, and a PEX gene screen, in which the most commonly altered exons of the various PEX genes are studied, are two examples. Carrier testing of relatives, early prenatal testing or preimplantation genetic diagnosis in families with a recurring risk for ZSS illnesses, and insight into genotype-phenotype correlations are all advantages of DNA testing for PBDs. The predictor gene sets were selected and the classifier was constructed in the training set, and the

efficiency in the classification of normal vs tumour tissues was tested in the test set, employing 86 stomach tissues divided into a training set and a test set. The chosen genes will aid in explaining the nature of molecular alterations in normal and malignant gastric cancer tissues. PBDs are a complex collection of autosomal recessive illnesses made up of two clinically different subtypes: the Zellweger syndrome spectrum (ZSS) disorders and rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata (RCDP) type 1 disorders.

## RNA extraction from tissue samples

The existence of widespread and resilient RNases that destroy RNA samples makes RNA extraction in molecular biology investigations extremely difficult. In comparison to neutralising DNases, certain RNases might be highly resilient, making inactivation challenging. There are other RNases in the environment in addition to the cellular RNases that are released. In many species, RNases have evolved to perform a variety of extracellular tasks. RNase 7, for example, is a member of the RNase A superfamily that is released by human skin and acts as an antipathogen defence. Enzymatic activity may not even be required for the exapted function of
these secreted RNases. Immune RNases, for example, work by disrupting bacterial cell membranes. Carrier testing of relatives, early prenatal testing or preimplantation genetic diagnosis in families with a recurring risk for ZSS illnesses, and insight into genotype-phenotype correlations are all advantages of DNA testing for PBDs, which may eventually help to enhance patient care. We explain the current state of genetic studies and the molecular underpinnings of PBDs in this review. The purification of RNA from biological sources is known as RNA extraction. The presence of ribonuclease enzymes in cells and tissues, which may rapidly breakdown RNA, complicates this approach. Several techniques for isolating RNA from materials are employed in molecular biology, the most popular of which being guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. The lysis and elution process based on filter paper has a high throughput capacity.

Discussion

The training set's t-test comparing tissue types (normal or malignant) resulted in the selection of 894 genes out of 12,891 with an adjusted p 0.05. The tissue types of all 58 samples in the training set were accurately predicted using cross-validation with the 894 genes. The test set's tissue types were predicted using the same collection of 894 genes. In the test set, 27 out of 28 samples (96.4 percent) were accurately predicted. The 894 genes were ranked according to their prediction strength (a negative natural log of p-values, Materials and methods) as a consequence of the cross-validation and prediction procedure. The hydrophobic lipids will partition into the lower organic phase, while the proteins

will remain in the interphase between the two phases, and the nucleic acids (along with other impurities like salts, sugars, and so on) will stay in the upper aqueous phase. After that, the top aqueous phase can be pipetted off. Pipetting any of the organic phase or substance at the contact must be avoided. To enhance the purity of the DNA, this step is generally repeated several times. This technique produces big double-stranded DNA suitable for PCR or RFLP.

Discussion

The training set's t-test comparing tissue types (normal or malignant) resulted in the selection of 894 genes out of 12,891 with an adjusted p 0.05. The tissue types of all 58 samples in the training set were accurately predicted using cross-validation with the 894 genes. The test set's tissue types were predicted using the same collection of 894 genes. In the test set, 27 out of 28 samples (96.4 percent) were accurately predicted. The 894 genes were ranked according to their prediction strength (a negative natural log of p-values, Materials and methods) as a consequence of the cross-validation and prediction procedure. The hydrophobic lipids will partition into the lower organic phase, while the proteins will remain in the interphase between the two phases, and the nucleic acids (along with other impurities like salts, sugars, and so on) will stay in the upper aqueous phase. After that, the top aqueous phase can be pipetted off. Pipetting any of the organic phase or substance at the contact must be avoided. To enhance the purity of the DNA, this step is generally repeated several times. This technique produces big double-stranded DNA suitable for PCR or RFLP.