<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

HAL
open science

# The Moleka Grid for African Cities : Designing Ontological Urban Futures

Pitshou Moleka

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Pitshou Moleka. The Moleka Grid for African Cities : Designing Ontological Urban Futures. 2025. [https://hal.science/hal-05189449v1](https://hal.science/hal-05189449v1)

HAL Id: hal-05189449

[https://hal.science/hal-05189449v1](https://hal.science/hal-05189449v1)

Preprint submitted on 28 Jul 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 4.0 International License
# The Moleka Grid for African Cities : Designing Ontological Urban Futures

Pitshou Moleka

Managing African Research Network, Kinshasa/DR Congo.

Email: sodecordc1@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0668-0919

## Abstract

Contemporary African cities are shaped by inherited colonial logics, fragmented planning systems, and extractive global models that often ignore the ontological, cultural, and systemic specificities of African urban life. This paper introduces the Moleka Grid, a pioneering diagnostic framework that moves beyond surface-level symptoms to reveal the paradigmatic and ontological layers of urban transformation. Drawing on complexity science, indigenous cosmologies, and systems thinking, the Moleka Grid helps to unpack the often-invisible codes shaping African urban realities. It offers a powerful tool for reimagining cities not as failed copies of the West, but as emergent, fractal systems rooted in unique histories, epistemologies, and possibilities. Through the Grid, this paper articulates a new vision for ontological urbanism — a design language that centres spatial justice, ecological coherence, and cultural regeneration in the future of African cities.

**Keywords** : Ontological urbanism, Spatial justice, Informality, Indigenous intelligence, Regenerative city-making, Fractal urban systems

## Introduction : Unveiling the Ontological Crisis of African Urbanism

African cities are undergoing profound transformations, yet the frameworks used to diagnose and shape these urban environments often remain trapped in outdated, exogenous models. While urbanization across the continent is proceeding at unprecedented speed—with projections suggesting that by 2050, more than 60% of Africans will live in urban areas (UN-Habitat, 2020)—the dominant paradigms guiding city-making are still rooted in colonial
legacies and neoliberal developmentalism (Myers, 2011; Pieterse & Parnell, 2014; Moleka, 2025a; 2025b; 2025c; 2025d; 2025e; 2025f). These paradigms reproduce what Arturo Escobar (2018) calls *ontological monocultures*, privileging Eurocentric views of the city as a technocratic machine rather than as a living, intelligent, and emergent system.

In this context, conventional urban diagnostic tools such as the Iceberg Model and the Three Horizons Framework have provided useful entry points into systemic thinking (Sharpe et al., 2016). However, these models often stop short of interrogating the ontological foundations— the deeper worldviews, metaphysical assumptions, and cosmological codes—that structure how urban problems are framed and addressed (Escobar, 2018; de Sousa Santos, 2014). What remains under-theorized is the city not just as a spatial-economic system, but as an expression of collective being—of how a society understands life, space, time, and intelligence.

This paper introduces the Moleka Grid, a new diagnostic and design framework that seeks to fill this epistemic and ontological gap. It builds on and transcends existing systemic models by layering three interconnected levels of analysis:

1. Symptomatic Layer: The visible problems—traffic, pollution, informal housing, poor infrastructure;

2. Paradigmatic Layer: The dominant models and frameworks that inform urban policy—modernist planning, smart cities, sustainable development;

3. Ontological Layer: The invisible assumptions and cosmologies about space, time, value, and life that inform how the city is *imagined* and *lived*.

By working across these three levels, the Moleka Grid enables scholars, urbanists, policymakers, and grassroots actors to not only diagnose dysfunctions but also co-design ontologically coherent, culturally grounded, and regenerative urban futures.

Rather than positioning African cities as “incomplete” versions of the Global North, this framework invites us to see them as epistemological laboratories—dynamic crucibles where new urban paradigms are being forged from the bottom up (Simone, 2004; Mbembe & Nuttall, 2004). The Moleka Grid reclaims African urbanism as a site of ontological innovation and positions the city as a fractal intelligence—a system capable of learning, adapting, and evolving in alignment with its own ancestral rhythms and future potentialities.
# I. The Urban Iceberg: Seeing Beyond the Visible City

In conventional urban policy and planning, interventions often target only the symptomatic layer of problems: traffic congestion, housing deficits, poor waste management, and infrastructural decay. This superficial focus reflects what systems theorists call the *tip of the iceberg*—the visible and immediate manifestations of deeper, systemic forces (Meadows, 2008). The metaphor of the iceberg, widely used in systems thinking, illustrates how most urban challenges are surface-level symptoms of invisible structures and paradigms below (Kania, Kramer, & Senge, 2018).

## 1.1. From Symptoms to Systems

The “urban iceberg” includes three layers:

* Surface (Symptomatic Layer): Observable events and crises—such as flooding, traffic jams, or power outages.

* Structural (Paradigmatic Layer): The patterns, institutional logics, and models (e.g., neoliberal urbanism, technocratic planning) that produce and reproduce those symptoms.

* Foundational (Ontological Layer): The deep, often unspoken assumptions about what a city *is*, what it *should be*, and who it *serves*—shaped by cultural worldviews, cosmologies, and systems of value.

For instance, informal settlements are typically treated as anomalies to be eradicated. But from a systemic lens, they are expressions of exclusionary planning logics and deeper assumptions about land, property, and modernity (Roy, 2005; Watson, 2014). Addressing only the symptoms (e.g., building more housing) without shifting paradigms (e.g., from “smart city” to “just city”) or ontologies (e.g., from colonial to pluriversal spatial imaginaries) ultimately leads to cyclical failures.

## 1.2. Why Current Models Are Not Enough

While frameworks such as the Three Horizons Model (Sharpe et al., 2016) help navigate transitions between present and future systems, they often remain confined to technocratic imagination. Similarly, even participatory models frequently neglect how
people's *worldviews*—their ontological assumptions—shape their understanding of what is possible or desirable in urban futures (Escobar, 2018).

In the African context, many urban plans fail precisely because they are not rooted in the ontological realities of the people they aim to serve. Cities are treated as blank slates, ignoring centuries of indigenous knowledge about spatial organization, community, and cosmology (Nabudere, 2006). Thus, the iceberg is not just hiding structures beneath symptoms—it is concealing entire worlds.

## 1.3. From Iceberg to Grid

The Moleka Grid builds upon and extends the iceberg metaphor by incorporating a third, ontological dimension, often left out in conventional diagnosis. By integrating the symptomatic, paradigmatic, and ontological layers, the Grid serves as a fractal map of urban intelligence, offering a more coherent and holistic way to understand African cities not as problems to fix, but as intelligent systems to decode and living entities to co-evolve with.

# 2. From Crisis Diagnostics to Ontological Realignment – The Need for a New Grid

## 2.1. The Limits of Symptomatic Urbanism

Urban theory and planning across the Global South—and particularly in postcolonial African contexts—have long operated within frameworks focused on symptoms: informal settlements, traffic congestion, sanitation failures, and infrastructure deficits. These symptomatic approaches, dominant since the colonial era, have persisted under the guise of "development" (Escobar, 2018), rebranded through projects such as smart cities or urban upgrading. Yet beneath these visible crises lies a deeper architecture of dysfunction: a colonial-modernist ontology that sees the city as a mechanistic and extractive entity, severed from its spiritual, ecological, and cosmological roots (Ndlovu-Gatsheni, 2020).

The failure of most urban interventions is not primarily technical but ontological. They arise from an epistemological void and ontological dislocation (Santos, 2014; Tavares, 2019). In Kinshasa, Nairobi, or Lagos, slums are often treated as engineering problems rather than
expressions of historical dispossession and cosmological rupture (Myers, 2021). As such, the urban crisis is fundamentally a crisis of worldviews (Mbembe, 2017).

## 2.2. Why We Need an Ontological Diagnostic Framework

To design cities that are livable, equitable, and regenerative, we must transition from transactional planning to transformational frameworks (Akom et al., 2016). This demands diagnostic tools that penetrate beneath infrastructure into the soul of the urban system. While frameworks like the Iceberg Model (Scharmer, 2009), the Three Horizons (Curry & Hodgson, 2008), and Integral Theory (Wilber, 2000) offer valuable insights, they remain largely anchored in Western epistemologies—emphasizing systems thinking, abstraction, and universal logics.

What is needed instead is a pluriversal framework—one that accommodates multiple coexisting ontologies, particularly those historically marginalized by colonial modernity (Escobar, 2020; de la Cadena & Blaser, 2018). The Moleka Grid emerges in response, functioning not merely as a tool but as an ontological compass. It invites us to re-sense and re-situate cities in alignment with ancestral rhythms, spiritual ecologies, and community-based sovereignties.

## 2.3. Decolonizing Diagnosis: From Planning to Remembering

Urban planning in Africa often functions within epistemic dependency—relying on foreign expertise, imported models, and technocratic logic (Hountondji, 1997; Comaroff & Comaroff, 2012). Yet cities cannot be reimagined without first being remembered. The Moleka Grid insists on decolonizing diagnosis by foregrounding African ways of knowing and being, not as folklore, but as living epistemologies (Odora Hoppers, 2002; Medie & Kang, 2018).

This marks a shift from solutionism to sense-making. The planner becomes a custodian of coherence, responsible for identifying where the city has become dislodged from its spiritual axis, cosmological rhythm, or social contract (Mignolo & Walsh, 2018). This is where the Moleka Grid's triadic logic—symptom, paradigm, ontology—proves essential. It reveals how urban dysfunction is also metaphysical dysfunction, requiring spiritual and epistemic realignment.

## 2.4. Framing the Moleka Grid: Beyond Diagnosis, Toward Realignment
The Moleka Grid is both a diagnostic system and a healing methodology. It shows that potholes, youth unemployment, or institutional distrust are not simply failures of policy—they are symptoms of civilizational misalignment. The Grid poses critical questions:

* What paradigm has normalized this symptom?

* What ontology underpins that paradigm?

* What must be unlearned or re-indigenized for coherence to re-emerge?

This is a radical departure. Whereas conventional models aim to fix cities, the Moleka Grid seeks to re-indigenize them (Sarr, 2019). It posits that urban regeneration is not a technocratic process, but a metaphysical act. In doing so, it opens the door to pluriversal governance, cosmogrammic design, and the reemergence of cities as living, spiritual, and sovereign ecologies (Kane, 2020; Ramose, 2002; Moleka, 2024a; 2024b).

### 3. From Diagnosis to Design: Reframing Urban Transformation Through the Moleka Grid

A diagnostic without a pathway to design risks becoming either academic or fatalistic.

The Moleka Grid not only reveals the layers of dysfunction in urban systems, but also enables a transition from insight to intervention. It provides a scaffolding to reimagine how cities can be co-designed as living, intelligent, and pluriversal systems—rooted in local cosmologies while engaging global complexity.

#### 3.1. The Three Levels of Transformation

The Moleka Grid operates on three interrelated planes:

* Symptomatic Layer – the observable problems: e.g., congestion, crime, poor service delivery.

* Paradigmatic Layer – the mental models, institutional logics, and design patterns shaping systems.

* Ontological Layer – the deep assumptions about reality, value, time, space, and the human being.
Urban design processes that focus only on the symptomatic level yield short-lived results. Lasting transformation requires shifting paradigms and, ultimately, recalibrating ontologies (Escobar, 2018). For example, urban waste management cannot be fully addressed through better logistics alone—it requires rethinking our relationship to matter, decay, and the sacred (Nabudere, 2005).

## 3.2. Pluriversal Design: Making Room for Many Worlds

Following Arturo Escobar’s (2018) concept of *pluriversality*, the Moleka Grid encourages designs that embrace epistemic plurality. African cities are not failed versions of European cities—they are sites of ontological innovation, where multiple ways of being and organizing life coexist, collide, and co-create.

Designing with the Moleka Grid requires asking:

* What ontologies are embedded in our infrastructure?

* What paradigms are shaping this policy, technology, or urban plan?

* Are we privileging certain worldviews while marginalizing others?

Planners and policymakers are thus invited to become ontological facilitators, not just technical problem-solvers.

## 3.3. Cosmograms and Living Infrastructures

Urban design informed by the Moleka Grid may employ cosmograms—visual maps of cosmological order—as planning tools. In many African traditions, spatial organization is intimately tied to cosmology: roads, compounds, markets, and sacred sites are encoded with spiritual and temporal meanings (Blier, 1998).

For instance:

* Circularity may reflect ancestral time.

* Axial paths may represent life-death transitions.

* Nodes of convergence may be designed for spiritual resonance, not just efficiency.

In this view, infrastructure becomes alive—not simply functional, but symbolic, ethical, and vibrational.
### 3.4. Reworlding the City

Urban transformation, then, is a project of reworlding—constructing new relational ecologies between people, nature, spirits, and technologies. The Moleka Grid serves as a compass in this process, enabling cities to design not only for performance but for meaning, memory, and metaphysics (Mbembe & Nuttall, 2004).

## 4. The Moleka Grid Framework Explained: A Systemic Diagnostic Tool for Urban Transformation

In an age of planetary urbanization marked by overlapping crises—ecological degradation, social fragmentation, infrastructural failure, and ontological dislocation—traditional urban planning tools are insufficient. The Moleka Grid emerges as a meta-diagnostic framework designed to map not only urban dysfunctions, but the *worldviews* that reproduce them. It expands beyond existing models like the Iceberg Model and Three Horizons Framework by integrating symptomatic, paradigmatic, and ontological dimensions into a coherent analytic and design tool tailored for African urban futures.

### 4.1. The Urban Iceberg: Beyond Symptoms

Conventional diagnostics often operate like tip-of-the-iceberg models. The visible symptoms of urban breakdown—traffic congestion, informal settlements, housing deficits, water scarcity—are overemphasized while deeper systemic causes are obscured (Meadows, 1999). The Moleka Grid insists that the root problems lie below the surface, in how cities are conceptualized, governed, and spiritually encoded.

<table><caption>**Table 1: Urban Layers Table (Symptomatic, Paradigmatic, Ontological)**</caption><thead><tr><td>Level</td><td>Urban Example</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Symptomatic</td><td>Traffic gridlock, rising insecurity, power outages</td></tr><tr><td>Paradigmatic</td><td>Car-centric planning, colonial zoning logics, linear development thinking</td></tr><tr><td>Ontological</td><td>City as machine vs. city as organism; humans as separate from nature vs. Kinship</td></tr></tbody></table>
This table offers a layered diagnostic lens that captures the nested nature of urban problems. It challenges the dominant planning mindset that focuses exclusively on symptoms (e.g., congestion), by demonstrating how each symptom is anchored in deeper paradigms (e.g., modernist planning) and even deeper ontological imaginaries (e.g., mechanistic vs. organic views of the city).

*   **Critical value:** The table shows that effective urban transformation must go beyond technical solutions to address foundational worldviews and cosmologies.

*   **Interpretive depth:** For example, traffic is not just an engineering issue—it is a symptom of both paradigmatic models (like car-centric design) and ontological imaginaries that separate infrastructure from ecology or body from land.

*   **Pedagogical use:** The triadic layering makes this table an excellent teaching tool for systems thinking in urban studies.

## 4.2. Grid Structure: A Three-Dimensional Diagnostic

The Moleka Grid is structured as a 3x3 matrix, intersecting three layers of analysis with three zones of system expression:

<table><caption>**Table 2 : Grid Structure: A Three-Dimensional Diagnostic**</caption><thead><tr><td></td><td>Material Infrastructure</td><td>Social Systems</td><td>Cognitive-Cosmological Layer</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Symptomatic Level</td><td>Potholes, poor sanitation</td><td>Youth unemployment, urban violence</td><td>Distrust in public institutions</td></tr><tr><td>Paradigmatic Level</td><td>Technocratic planning assumptions</td><td>Western governance models</td><td>Developmentalism, linear time paradigms</td></tr><tr><td>Ontological Level</td><td>Disconnection from land as sacred</td><td>Erasure of ancestral knowledge</td><td>Loss of cosmological coherence</td></tr></tbody></table>

This matrix is not merely a planning tool, but an epistemic mirror and a civilizational design map. It enables planners, thinkers, and urban actors to move across vertical and horizontal dimensions of urban complexity—from surface-level issues to paradigmatic drivers and deep ontological ruptures—and across physical, social, and symbolic-spiritual domains.
* Horizontally: It reveals how urban breakdowns manifest across three core zones—physical infrastructure, socio-political systems, and worldview/cosmology.

* Vertically: It tracks how those breakdowns originate and interact across symptomatic expressions, paradigm-level logics, and ontological foundations.

This multi-scalar approach allows the Moleka Grid to function as a fractally recursive tool—where every node of the matrix contains deeper layers of relational complexity.

## -Material Infrastructure

* Symptomatic: “Potholes, poor sanitation” are obvious signs of decay, but they are often misread as technical failures alone.

* Paradigmatic: “Technocratic planning assumptions” reveal how material systems are often designed without community input, context, or ecological rhythm—based on one-size-fits-all models.

* Ontological: “Disconnection from land as sacred” shows how modern infrastructure is imposed on the land as a resource to extract from, not as a relative to commune with—violating African cosmologies of land-as-life.

This column shows that “infrastructure” must be reimagined as sacralized ecology, not neutral materiality. Urban healing begins when potholes are seen not just as failure of engineering, but of relational ethics with land and place.

## -Social Systems

* Symptomatic: “Youth unemployment, urban violence” reflect social rupture and disenfranchisement—symptoms that are often racialized or securitized rather than understood systemically.

* Paradigmatic: “Western governance models” impose hierarchical, state-centric logics that often clash with distributed African leadership models (e.g., palaver systems, relational authority).

* Ontological: “Erasure of ancestral knowledge” points to deep epistemic violence—the removal of indigenous systems of social organization, rites of passage, communal learning, and relational justice.
The social column exposes that social breakdown in African cities is not just institutional—it's ontological exile from ancestral systems of being-in-community.

## -Cognitive-Cosmological Layer

* Symptomatic: “Distrust in public institutions” is a direct consequence of cognitive dissonance between imposed governance systems and lived spiritual/cultural realities.

* Paradigmatic: “Developmentalism, linear time paradigms” show how time is conceived in rigid, teleological terms—progress, GDP, modernity—ignoring cyclical, ancestral, or sacred temporalities.

* Ontological: “Loss of cosmological coherence” reveals the deepest crisis—a rupture in meaning-making. Urban design, when decoupled from cosmology, creates soulless cities, metaphysical deserts.

This column makes the bold move of restoring cosmology as a planning category. It invites us to ask: *What gods, ancestors, or spiritual rhythms dwell in this city plan?*

## 4.3. Application: Diagnosing Kinshasa, Nairobi, or Lagos

To apply the Moleka Grid in a city like Kinshasa, for instance, planners might begin by asking:

* Symptomatic: What are the recurring, visible breakdowns in infrastructure, service delivery, and social cohesion?

* Paradigmatic: What models of urbanism are being uncritically imported or applied (e.g., Eurocentric zoning, GDP-driven growth)?

* Ontological: What indigenous cosmologies or temporalities have been suppressed? What role do spirituality, the ancestors, and land relations play in shaping space?

This diagnostic allows cities to see themselves systemically and spiritually—not as broken copies of the West, but as fields of emergent possibility.

## 4.4. Integration with Participatory Design

The Moleka Grid integrates seamlessly with participatory design methodologies by extending them beyond consultative practices toward epistemic and ontological co-creation. Traditional participatory design often invites community input at the level of needs or preferences
(Simonsen & Robertson, 2013), but it rarely interrogates the worldviews, cosmologies, or cultural logics that shape how different communities experience space, time, infrastructure, or even “the future.”

The Moleka Grid reframes participation as a multi-world encounter, where design becomes a process of negotiating not just functional solutions, but ontological realities. For instance, in contexts like Kinshasa or Nairobi, design must consider how ancestral presence, ritual space, or communal temporality inform the very meaning of shelter, mobility, or public space (Mbembe, 2017; Escobar, 2018).

By organizing diagnostics along symptomatic, paradigmatic, and ontological layers, the Moleka Grid encourages design processes that:

* Recognize participants not merely as users but as custodians of distinct intelligences—technical, cultural, spiritual, ecological.

* Surface hidden assumptions embedded in “expert” models that may conflict with local worldviews.

* Enable deep co-diagnosis, where community members and designers engage in reflexive inquiry to reveal misalignments and potential synergies.

* Support the co-design of pluriversal futures, where multiple realities can coexist and inform the built environment.

This layered participatory approach is especially vital in postcolonial and indigenous contexts, where design historically functioned as a tool of ontological erasure. The Moleka Grid restores design as an arena of justice, not just in terms of distribution but in terms of epistemic dignity and cosmological recognition.

**4.5. From Mirror to Map: The Moleka Grid as a Tool for Urban Navigation**

The Moleka Grid functions both as a mirror (revealing the deep structures shaping urban reality) and as a map (guiding transformative action). It helps transition urban interventions from fragmented solutions to coherent systemic realignments.

For example:
* Policy alignment: By diagnosing paradigm-level contradictions, the Grid can inform urban policies that align infrastructure with cultural logic (e.g., decentralizing governance in communities where authority is relational and distributed).

* Epistemic justice: The Grid legitimizes marginalized worldviews—oral traditions, sacred geographies, ecological kinship—as vital sources of planning intelligence.

* Temporal harmonization: Instead of forcing cities into “modernist time,” it embraces multiple urban temporalities (e.g., festival rhythms, ancestral cycles, ecological time).

Through these functions, the Moleka Grid reshapes the urban design question—from “What infrastructure do we need?” to “What reality are we reinforcing, and whose future are we building?”

## 4.6. Comparison with Other Frameworks

<table><thead><tr><td>Framework</td><td>Strengths</td><td>Limitations</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Iceberg Model</td><td>Introduces surface/deep distinction</td><td>Lacks ontological depth; limited to system dynamics</td></tr><tr><td>Three Horizons Framework</td><td>Supports futures thinking across timelines</td><td>Can be abstract; misses cultural or cosmological logic</td></tr><tr><td>Integral Theory (Wilber)</td><td>Offers quadrant-based multiperspectivality</td><td>Western-centric metaphysics; lacks decolonial lens</td></tr><tr><td>Moleka Grid</td><td>Integrates symptom, paradigm, and ontology in context</td><td>Designed for African urban systems and worldviews</td></tr></tbody></table>

This comparison table highlights how the Moleka Grid advances beyond existing frameworks by explicitly integrating ontological and decolonial dimensions. While the Iceberg Model, Three Horizons, and Integral Theory each offer useful insights into systems and futures thinking, they largely operate within Western epistemic boundaries. In contrast, the Moleka Grid is rooted in African worldviews, addressing spiritual dislocation, ontological erasure, and epistemic injustice—making it uniquely equipped for transformative urbanism in postcolonial contexts.

## 4.7. Urban Planners as Ontological Architects
A final implication of the Grid is that urban planners are not merely engineers or bureaucrats—they are ontological architects. Every zoning law, road layout, and building code encodes a worldview: about what is real, what matters, who counts, and how life flows.

Training future African urbanists must therefore include:

* Cosmological literacy: Understanding local beliefs, sacred ecologies, and relational ontologies.

* Paradigm fluency: Identifying and critiquing imported development paradigms.

* Systemic reflexivity: Seeing how one's own epistemology affects urban design.

As Escobar (2018) reminds us, cities are not just physical but pluriversal fields—sites where multiple ways of being and knowing co-exist or collide.

## 4.8. Toward a Grid of Regeneration

Ultimately, the Moleka Grid is a call to re-enchant the city. It affirms that urban transformation requires more than bricks and budgets—it demands a reweaving of cosmologies, communities, and conditions for life.

By shifting the diagnostic gaze from merely *what is broken* to *what is ontologically misaligned*, the Moleka Grid opens the path toward cities of coherence, sacredness, and regenerative potential.

# 5. Case Study: Applying the Moleka Grid in Kinshasa

## 5.1. Contextual Background

Kinshasa, the capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo, is a city of paradoxes—simultaneously a megacity of over 17 million and a constellation of decentralized lifeworlds, informal systems, and spiritual geographies. Despite large-scale urban projects and state-led modernization efforts, Kinshasa remains largely self-organized through vernacular logics, communal economies, and cosmo-political beliefs (De Boeck, 2011; Trefon, 2004).
This makes Kinshasa an ideal context to test the Moleka Grid, especially for revealing misalignments between imported urban paradigms and local ontological infrastructures.

## 5.2. Symptomatic Layer

Surface symptoms in Kinshasa include:

* Chronic traffic congestion and decaying roads.

* Inconsistent energy supply despite electrification initiatives.

* Unregulated informal settlements sprawling at the periphery.

* Persistent pollution in rivers and open waste dumps.

Urban policy tends to treat these symptoms technocratically—as failures of planning, finance, or institutional capacity.

## 5.3. Paradigmatic Layer

However, deeper diagnostics reveal that these symptoms are consequences of imported paradigms:

* Modernist Planning Logic: Emphasis on masterplans, grid layouts, and zoning ignores the organic fluidity of Kinshasa's self-organized settlements.

* Economic Formalization: Policies attempt to “formalize” informal economies without recognizing them as resilient social infrastructures.

* Temporal Standardization: Planning operates on bureaucratic time, disregarding the relational temporality of local livelihoods (e.g., daily survival rhythms, ritual calendars).

Thus, dysfunction emerges from a mismatch of paradigms, not just resource scarcity.

## 5.4. Ontological Layer

At its deepest level, the Moleka Grid helps reveal ontological fractures:

* Disenchanted Urbanism: Imported models exclude ancestral presence, sacred geographies, and spiritual ecologies that shape Kinshasa's spatial logics.
* Fractured Identity: Colonial and postcolonial regimes imposed European city-making ideals that delegitimize indigenous ontologies and spatial epistemes.

* Worldview Misalignment: Infrastructure assumes atomized individuals, not relational selves embedded in community, lineage, and spiritual fields.

Here, the Moleka Grid doesn't just critique design—it reclaims reality. It urges planners to recognize the city as a living cosmogram, not just a technocratic machine.

## 5.5. Regenerative Realignments

Using the Grid, we propose alternative principles for urban planning in Kinshasa:

<table><thead><tr><th>Diagnostic Layer</th><th>Conventional Paradigm</th><th>Moleka-Aligned Realignment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>Symptom</th><td>Slums as disorder</td><td>Settlements as emergent ecologies</td></tr><tr><th>Paradigm</th><td>State-led formalization</td><td>Community-based cosmo-governance</td></tr><tr><th>Ontology</th><td>City as infrastructure</td><td>City as spirit-anchored field</td></tr></tbody></table>

These shifts reposition Kinshasa as a site of ontological intelligence—where healing urbanism begins with worldview reconciliation.

## 5.6. Lessons for Urban Africa

Kinshasa's case demonstrates:

1. The limits of technical rationality when worldviews clash.

2. The power of ontological diagnostics to reveal hidden logics and regenerative possibilities.

3. The necessity of decolonizing the urban gaze, aligning design with pluriversal ontologies.

As other African cities experience similar tensions between modernization and metaphysical continuity, the Moleka Grid offers a scalable yet deeply contextual tool for navigating the complexity of urban becoming.
## 7. Conclusion

The Moleka Grid offers more than a diagnostic tool—it is a transformative lens through which African cities can reclaim their ontological sovereignty and redefine their futures. By peeling back the layers of symptoms to expose the paradigmatic assumptions and ontological foundations that undergird urban life, the Grid challenges inherited colonial legacies and developmentalist mimicry. It invites planners, policymakers, and communities to engage in a decolonial praxis that honors indigenous knowledge systems, sacred spatialities, and emergent urban intelligences.

In embracing the Moleka Grid, African cities can transcend reductionist approaches and instead become fractals of possibility — complex, adaptive, and regenerative systems that embody their own histories, cosmologies, and aspirations. This ontological urbanism demands a shift from viewing cities as mechanical constructs toward seeing them as living cosmograms, where spatial justice, ecological stewardship, and cultural vitality are inseparable.

As the continent faces unprecedented challenges—climate crises, rapid urbanization, socio-political upheavals—the Moleka Grid provides a compass for navigation. It empowers diverse actors to co-create urban futures grounded in pluralism, relationality, and systemic coherence. Ultimately, the Grid is a call to reimagine African urbanism not as a derivative or delayed modernity, but as a bold civilizational project that can contribute uniquely to the global tapestry of planetary regeneration and collective flourishing.

## References

* Akom, A. A., Shah, A., Nakai, A., & Cruz, T. (2016). *Youth participatory action research (YPAR) and its impact on urban planning*. *Environment and Urbanization*, 28(1), 189–204.

* Blier, S. P. (1998). *The Anatomy of Architecture: Ontology and Metaphor in Batammaliba Architectural Expression*. University of Chicago Press.

* Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (2012). *Theory from the South: Or, How Euro-America is Evolving Toward Africa*. Paradigm Publishers.
* Curry, A., & Hodgson, A. (2008). Seeing in multiple horizons: Connecting futures to strategy. *Journal of Futures Studies*, 13(1), 1–20.

* De Boeck, F. (2011). Inhabiting ocular ground: Kinshasa's future in the light of Congo's spectral urban politics. *Cultural Anthropology*, 26(2), 263–286.

* de la Cadena, M., & Blaser, M. (Eds.). (2018). *A World of Many Worlds*. Duke University Press.

* de Sousa Santos, B. (2014). *Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide*. Routledge.

* Escobar, A. (2018). *Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds*. Duke University Press.

* Escobar, A. (2020). *Pluriversal Politics: The Real and the Possible*. Duke University Press.

* Hountondji, P. (1997). *Endogenous Knowledge: Research Trails*. Codesria.

* Kane, O. (2020). *Beyond Timbuktu: An Intellectual History of Muslim West Africa*. Harvard University Press.

* Kania, J., Kramer, M., & Senge, P. (2018). The water of systems change. *FSG Publications*.

* Mbembe, A. (2017). *Critique of Black Reason*. Duke University Press.

* Mbembe, A., & Nuttall, S. (2004). Writing the world from an African metropolis. *Public Culture*, 16(3), 347–372.

* Meadows, D. H. (2008). *Thinking in Systems: A Primer*. Chelsea Green Publishing.

* Medie, P. A., & Kang, A. J. (2018). Power, knowledge and the politics of gender in the Global South. *European Journal of Politics and Gender*, 1(1-2), 37–54.

* Mignolo, W. D., & Walsh, C. E. (2018). *On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis*. Duke University Press.

* Moleka, P. (2024a). The Transformative Power of Innovationology. doi: 10.20944/preprints202410.2225.v1

* Moleka, P. (2024b). The Theology of Innovation: Unveiling the Divine Spark in Human Creativity. doi: 10.20944/preprints202411.1738.v2
* Moleka, P. (2025a). The Moleka Grid: An Ontological Diagnostic Framework for Systemic Transformation. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5267882 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5267882

* Moleka, P. (2025b). Towards an Infinity Economy: Designing Post-Scarcity Economic Systems in the Age of AI and Quantum Abundance. doi: 10.20944/preprints202506.0414.v1

* Moleka, P. (2025c). Metawar and the Future of Cognitive Sovereignty: Rethinking National Security Beyond Cyberspace. doi: 10.20944/preprints202506.2053.v1

* Moleka, P. (2025d). Post-Extractivism and the Crisis of Development: Reimagining the Congo Basin as a Knowledge Economy. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5261537 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5261537

* Moleka, P. (2025e). *Mode 4 Knowledge Production and the Transcendental Knowledge Nexus. A New Paradigm for Sustainable Development*. GRIN Verlag.

* Moleka, P. (2025f). Ubuntu and Sustainable Cities in Africa. In *The Palgrave Handbook of Ubuntu, Inequality and Sustainable Development* (pp. 355-370). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

* Myers, G. A. (2011). *African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice*. Zed Books.

* Myers, G. A. (2021). *Rethinking Urbanism: Lessons from Postcolonialism and the Global South*. Bristol University Press.

* Nabudere, D. (2005). *Towards an Afrokology of Knowledge Production and African Regeneration*. Real African Publishers.

* Nabudere, D. W. (2006). Towards an Afro-centric education for African liberation. *African Journal of Political Science and International Relations*, 1(1), 1–15.

* Nandy, A. (1987). *Tradition, Tyranny and Utopia: Essays in the Politics of Awareness*. Oxford University Press.

* Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2020). *Decolonization, Development and Knowledge in Africa: Turning Over a New Leaf*. Routledge.

* Odora Hoppers, C. A. (2002). *Indigenous Knowledge and the Integration of Knowledge Systems*. New Africa Books.

* Pieterse, E., & Parnell, S. (2014). *Africa's Urban Revolution*. Zed Books.
* Ramose, M. B. (2002). *African Philosophy Through Ubuntu*. Mond Books.

* Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. *Journal of the American Planning Association*, 71(2), 147–158.

* Santos, B. de S. (2014). *Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide*. Routledge.

* Sarr, F. (2019). *Afrotopia*. University of Minnesota Press.

* Scharmer, O. (2009). *Theory U: Leading from the Future as It Emerges*. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

* Sharpe, B., Hodgson, A., Leicester, G., Lyon, A., & Fazey, I. (2016). Three horizons: A pathways practice for transformation. *Ecology and Society*, 21(2), 47.

* Simone, A. (2004). *For the City Yet to Come: Changing African Life in Four Cities*. Duke University Press.

* Tavares, P. (2019). *The Political Life of Plants*. e-flux, (104).

* Trefon, T. (2004). *Reinventing order in the Congo: How people respond to state failure in Kinshasa*. Zed Books.

• UN-Habitat. (2020). *World Cities Report 2020: The Value of Sustainable Urbanization*. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

* Watson, V. (2014). African urban fantasies: Dreams or nightmares? *Environment and Urbanization*, 26(1), 215–231.

* Wilber, K. (2000). *A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science and Spirituality*. Shambhala.