Methods and systems for assessing loan portfolios

Methods and systems for assessing a loan portfolio for variance are described. In an example embodiment, the method comprises the steps of identifying a milestone for at least one loan in the portfolio at a selected time of assessment, determining planned collections for the loan for the selected time of assessment, determining actual collections for the loan the selected time period of assessment, and populating a spreadsheet identifying a current milestone and a cumulative variance between planned collections and actual collections at the milestone for the loan.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to assessing loan portfolios, and more specifically, to assessing collections variance in non-performing loan portfolios.

The term “loan portfolio” refers to a group of loans related by, for example, market segment or a geographic market. For example, a loan portfolio may consist of thousands of automobile loans in a particular country. A non-performing loan portfolio is a loan portfolio in which each loan is in late stages of delinquency (i.e., has many payments due). The term “variance” refers in this context to a difference between actual payments and planned payments arising from a re-negotiation.

A lender may have many non-performing loans (e.g., 10,000 to 20,000 loans) having a total value of billions of dollars, worldwide. Management of non-performing loan portfolios typically involves monitoring the productivity and yield of the overall collection process, and its constituent steps. More specifically, managing non-performing loans involves administration of the following matters:status of borrower negotiations, as asset managers work with borrowers through a series of standard settlement milestones,annual business plans established for each borrower in each portfolio, ascribing the expected amount and timing of cash flows, and collection method strategy,actual monthly payments made by each borrower to retire the debt, andaccount characteristics (borrower, loan, collateral, asset manager).

A lender may seek investors to participate in the risk and rewards associated with acquiring and managing non-performing loan portfolios. Among typical investor requests in connection with non-performing portfolios the investor owns, or is considering investing in, are forecasts of monthly amounts collected for each portfolio up to one year in advance, as well as detailed explanations of actual differences or variances from the targeted, or planned, collection amounts.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, a method for assessing a loan portfolio for variance is provided. In an example embodiment, the method comprises the steps of identifying a milestone for at least one loan in the portfolio at a selected time of assessment, determining planned collections for the loan for the selected time of assessment, determining actual collections for the loan for the selected time period of assessment, and populating a spreadsheet identifying a current milestone and a cumulative variance between planned collections and actual collections at the milestone for the loan.

In another aspect, a database for a variance tracking system is provided. The database comprises a memory storage having data stored therein, and the data comprises a milestone status for each of a plurality of loans, planned payments for each loan, actual payments for a plurality of loans, and indexes of time associated with each planned payment and with each actual payment.

In yet another aspect, a computer program for controlling operation of a computer to determine variance in a loan portfolio is provided. In an example embodiment, the computer program is executable to control the computer to associate each loan in the portfolio with one of a plurality of milestones, determine cumulative planned collections for a selected loan for the selected time of assessment, determine cumulative actual collections for the loan for the selected time period of assessment, and determine a cumulative variance for the loan for the selected time period of assessment based on the cumulative planned collections and cumulative actual collections.

In still yet another aspect, a variance tracker system for tracking variance in a loan portfolio is provided. The system comprises a database comprising a memory storage having data stored therein. The data comprises a milestone status for each of a plurality of loans, planned payments for each loan, actual payments for a plurality of loans, and indexes of time associated with each planned payment and with each actual payment. The system further comprises a processor coupled to the database. The processor is programmed to associate each loan in the portfolio with one of a plurality of milestones, determine cumulative planned collections for a selected loan for the selected time of assessment, determine cumulative actual collections for the loan for the selected time period of assessment, and determine a cumulative variance for the loan for the selected time period of assessment based on the cumulative planned collections and cumulative actual collections.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Set forth below is a description of an information management system for tracking portfolio variance of non-performing loan portfolios. The technical effect produced by the system is the generation of a spreadsheet for analyzing and understanding variances between planned and actual performance at the portfolio level, and improved forecast capability for near and long term.

In an example embodiment, the variance tracking system is implemented on a personal computer in a Microsoft Office operating system environment. Microsoft Office software is commercially available from Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Wash. A spreadsheet program, such as Excel (also commercially available from Microsoft Corporation) is loaded into the personal computer. A data management system, such as Access (also commercially available from Microsoft Corporation) also is loaded into the personal computer. Of course, other operating systems, other spreadsheet programs, and other data management systems can be utilized. In addition, the processor need not be in the form of a personal computer. The processor selected need only be capable of performing the processing described herein to be utilized.

The example system described below tracks plan versus actual collections for non-performing loan portfolios. In addition, the system enables an end-user to dynamically rank portfolio segments (or borrowers) by their contribution to plan versus actual collections variance.

Referring now specifically to the drawings,FIG. 1is a block diagram10illustrating an example embodiment of an information system for variance tracking. A system server12provides users with access to operational information for asset management14, recorded into a data warehouse16in an ongoing basis from other applications residing on a network, e.g., a local area network. The data warehouse16, in an example embodiment, is an Oracle database, commercially available from Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, Calif.

The information stored in data warehouse16includes, for example:

Borrower Contact Information,

Borrower Characteristics (e.g., size of outstanding balance, nature of collateral security, lien information, historical payment performance, litigation status, and underwritten valuation), and

Asset Management Milestones (with corresponding dates and expected “recovery” amounts where appropriate*): Not Contacted, In Negotiation, Scheduled for Approval, Approved*, Approved Delinquent, Closed*, Closed Delinquent, Paid-In-Full, and Foreclosed*.

Portfolio administrators18construct periodic (e.g., annual, quarterly) business plans20for debtor groups (e.g., individuals, borrower alliances, and portfolio segments). The business plans20include the expected monthly cash payments made by the debtor groups. The time horizon (beginning month to ending month) of the business plans20for each debtor group is the same (e.g., January 2001 to December 2005).

Portfolio administrators18choose among various available borrower, loan, and collateral characteristics pertaining to the debtor group. These characteristics are used for subsequent “data mining” purposes (e.g., prioritizing debtor groups, stratified by their common group characteristics, according to each stratum's contribution to an overall variance calculation as described below).

Once debtor groups have progressed through asset milestone phases and achieve a negotiated settlement (i.e., are “closed”), loan servicing22issues notification of contractual cash payments. As payments are received, they are posted in a cash management system24, from which general ledger26accounting entries are made. For non-performing loans, these contractual cash flows usually sum to considerably less than the balance owed to the original credit issuer. A purchaser of non-performing loan portfolios (from the original credit issuer or subsequent purchaser) aims to collect more than his/her purchase price for each debtor group in the portfolio.

The systems and methods described herein facilitate determining how well the periodic business plans are borne out in reality and in addition, allow for the identification of portfolio segments (strata) which are the chief contributors to slippages (or accelerations) in actual payments made, as compared to the business plans (or contractual cash flows). These functions are sometimes referred to herein as variance tracking. Such functions are performed in the system illustrated inFIG. 1by the variance tracker database28(illustrated inFIG. 1and sometimes referred to herein as the variance tracker DataMart) and the variance tracker client30. More specifically, data from data warehouse16and from the business plans20is stored in database28, and variance tracker client30is an application program executed by the personal computer to perform the functions described above (i.e., variance tracking).

More particularly, and referring toFIG. 2, variance tracker database28, i.e., DataMart, is created by performing certain tasks on an annual/quarterly and monthly basis. For example, business plans20are created on an annual or quarterly basis. The DataMart28is data stored on the personal computer memory utilizing the data management system12(e.g., the Access data management system), as described above. The plans20are comprised of expected monthly cash flows for each debtor group, and are uploaded to variance tracker DataMart28. Business plans20can be for a single borrower, borrower alliances, and portfolio segments.

The business plans20are usually created in a normalized format (i.e., a matrix format—with debtor group ID's in rows, and monthly expected payments in columns). The normalized format is converted to a de-normalized36, or list-oriented, version of the business plan20. The number of months between a starting month and each payment month—a Time Series ID—is assigned (i.e., monitoring may start in January, 2001, and payments made in May, 2001, June, 2001, or months 5 and 6, respectively) to each plan20. De-normalization36occurs each time business plans20are uploaded.

On a monthly basis, debtors progress through a standardized series of asset milestones. Monitoring the transition of borrowers through these critical junctures provides indication of the asset management performance. The asset milestone38progress therefore is tracked and organized by asset ID. In addition, actual cash collections in each month are uploaded and assigned a Time Series ID. The cumulative cash collections40(Cume Cash Collections) are organized by SubAsset ID and by Asset ID in a table format. As cash payments may be tracked at a different level (e.g., by loan) than that of other database entities (e.g., asset milestones, data mining characteristics, business plans), a map associating these different levels (ID Maps42) is updated and uploaded. Specifically, the ID Map42associates Asset ID and SubAsset ID to specific loans. Expected payments from business plans for each debtor group, for each time series ID is associated, or linked44, with actual payments, aggregated from SubAsset ID to Asset ID (debtor group ID) by Time Series ID.

Appendix A contains database schematics (DS) that can be utilized in building one example embodiment of variance tracker DataMart28. Specifically, DS1is a database schematic for the CFIDs (a.k.a., “Cash Flow ID's”), DS2is for payment data, DS3is for approved (i.e., accepted by investors) business plans, DS4is for large (i.e., borrowers with large balances) business plans, DS5is for buckets (i.e., portfolio segments) business plan, DS6is for business plan totals, DS7is for milestones, DS8is for CFIDs without business plans, DS9is for variance tracking data, DS10is for variance tracking data, DS10is for subtype export data, and DS11is for subtype export data.

Once a DataMart28is created, then a variance tracker client30is utilized to generate a transition inventory matrix46, which illustrates key portfolio statistics and variance calculations for any selected (drilled-down) segment of the portfolio, and by asset milestone one-month status changes. The matrix is generated by the personal computer using, for example, the Excel spreadsheet program, as described above. A transition inventory matrix can be created for any historical month, beginning with the first month of portfolio monitoring. Using the transition inventory matrix46, sources and movements over time of borrowers, payments, and variances can be assessed48. Such assessment48can be utilized to better identify asset management process improvements, resulting in an improved ability to manage strategic operations.

FIGS. 3-9Fillustrate one example of creating DataMart28and constructing a transition inventory matrix46. More particularly,FIG. 3illustrates normalization of a business plan20. Specifically, from an initial plan matrix50which depicts accounts (rows) across plan months (columns), normalization creates a list-oriented format52which is useful for subsequent matching.

Planned payments are then coded as illustrated inFIG. 4. Such coding refers to translating the contents of a time field54(in the example, a “Month”) into an index of time56, namely, identify the number of months from a selected point in time to which the record pertains. For example, if the selected point in time is November, 2000 (i.e., November, 2000= month index 1), then the month of January, 2001 corresponds to a month index of 3 as illustrated inFIG. 4.

Actual payments58also are coded60, as illustrated inFIG. 5. The same coding methodology utilized to code the planned payments is utilized to code the actual payments.

Referring now toFIG. 6, and for variance analysis of cumulative plan versus actual differences, from a specific point in time through a current month62(e.g., from November, 2000 through March, 2001), the user must specify the index of the time assessment (in the example, month index 5). By so specifying the month index64, then a transition inventory matrix46can be created for assessment.

Once the month index64is specified, then as shown inFIG. 7, matching and cumulative variance through the specified period of time can be determined. Cumulative (cume) variance70is the difference between cume plan72and cume actual74up through and including the time of assessment76(in the example, the 5thmonth index).

Referring toFIG. 8, the cume variance70can be performed for any desired time of assessment76. Assessments between two different time periods80,82are used to create a transition inventory matrix46, which illustrates how accounts move through a management system, and which accounts are producing the largest contribution to cume variance. In the example illustrated inFIG. 8, accounts that were approved84and previously closed currently86are producing 28 units of cume variance. Accounts that were closed previously88and now delinquent90are also producing this amount of cume variance.

FIGS. 9A-Fillustrate a transaction inventory matrix46representing an assessment of 3376 accounts. The matrix is created using, for example, the Excel spreadsheet program commercially available from Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Wash. The spreadsheet is populated using the data stored in DataMart28and based on the time period selected by the analyst for assessment.

Typically, accounts will advance in management milestones from one month (or time of assessment) to the next. Bottlenecks can be identified by accumulation of variance. In the example shown inFIGS. 9A-F, accounts which are ‘prior to-approval’ 100 in both the current and previous periods (1487 accounts) have generated the greatest amount of plan versus actual variance (approximately −2 MM currency units).

Using the pivot tables in the Excel program, an analyst can “drill down” using account characteristics that may be drivers of variance. More particularly, and in the example shown inFIGS. 9A-F, in the upper left hand corner of the pivot tables, five variables102are listed. These variables102can be used to isolate problematic account segments. An analyst simply uses the ‘drop down’ boxes to select an account segment (for example, “Real Estate Secured” as an attribute of the characteristic “Collateral Type”). The pivot table is automatically updated to reflect the selected segment's contribution to variance. Account segments can be rank-ordered in terms of their contribution.

Example user interfaces are described below in connection withFIGS. 10-13. Of course, many different formats and selections can be utilized for the user interface and the user interfaces illustrated below inFIGS. 10-13are example user interfaces.FIG. 10is a screen shot of an example user interface. A date selection110(i.e., Today's date is) points to a current date as a default. The date can be changed by selecting a drop down button. Once the drop down button is selected, a calendar112, as shown inFIG. 11, is displayed. A new date is selected by ‘double clicking’ on the desired date. Once the date is selected, the user then selects “Transistion Inventory with new data”114.

As shown inFIG. 12, a user can select “Transistion Inventory with existing data”116, which results in display of a pivot table with the most recently accessed data. A user also can select “Transition Inventory with new data”114, which results in display of a pivot table with newly generated data and the selected date. A user can also select “View data”118, which results in display of data for which the pivot table is being displayed. A user can also select “View sub-type data”120, which results in display of sub-type data. A user can further select “Import new files into the database”122, which results in importing new data into the system using a user interface as shown inFIG. 13.

As shown inFIG. 13, the import new files user interface includes a browse selecting button so that a user can select a data file to import. Selecting the “Import Sub Asset” button124results in importing the sub-asset data from the data file. Selecting the import payments buttons126(in the example, shown as the “Import Silverlake Payments”

The system described above provides an ability to analyze and understand variances between planned and actual performance at the portfolio level, and improved forecast capability for near and long term. In addition, the system provides the ability to adjust portfolio management to improve efficiency, as well as analytical data for future (i.e., planned purchases) portfolio valuation and acquisition.