Pillows and other filled articles and in their filling materials

Pillows and other filled articles are filled with bicomponent polyester fibers that have "spiral crimp" on account of a difference in chain-branched content of the polyester polymers of the components. Such bicomponent fibers are preferably novel "spiral crimp" bicomponent fibers that are hollow and/or are slickened.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
This invention concerns improvements in and relating to pillows and other 
filled articles, more generally, in and relating to their filling 
materials, and more particularly in and relating to polyester fiberfill 
filling material such as has "spiral crimp", including new such polyester 
fiberfill filling material, and new processes and new spinnerets for 
making them. 
BACKGROUND ART 
Polyester fiberfill filling material (sometimes referred to herein as 
polyester fiberfill) has become well accepted as a reasonably inexpensive 
filling and/or insulating material especially for pillows, and also for 
cushions and other furnishing materials, including other bedding 
materials, such as sleeping bags, mattress pads, quilts and comforters and 
including duvets, and in apparel, such as parkas and other insulated 
articles of apparel, because of its bulk filling power, aesthetic 
qualities and various advantages over other filling materials, so is now 
manufactured and used in large quantities commercially. "Crimp" is a very 
important characteristic. "Crimp" provides the bulk that is an essential 
requirement for fiberfill. Slickeners, referred to in the art and 
hereinafter, are preferably applied to improve aesthetics. As with any 
product, it is preferred that the desirable properties not deteriorate 
during prolonged use; this is referred to generally as durability. Hollow 
polyester fibers have generally been preferred over solid filaments, and 
improvements in our ability to make hollow polyester fiberfill with a 
round periphery has been an important reason for the commercial acceptance 
of polyester fiberfill as a preferred filling material. Examples of hollow 
cross-sections are those with a single void, such as disclosed by 
Tolliver, U.S. Pat. No. 3,772,137, and by Glanzstoff, GB 1,168,759, 
4-hole, such as disclosed in EPA 2 67,684 (Jones and Kohi), and 7-hole, 
disclosed by Broaddus, U.S. Pat. No. 5,104,725, all of which have been 
used commercially as hollow polyester fiberfill filling material. Most 
commercial filling material has been used in the form of cut fibers (often 
referred to as staple) but some filling material, including polyester 
fiberfill filling material, has been used in the form of deregistered tows 
of continuous filaments, as disclosed, for example by Watson, U.S. Pat. 
Nos. 3,952,134, and 3,328,850. 
Generally, for economic reasons, polyester fiberfill fiberfilling material, 
especially in the form of staple, has been made bulky by mechanical 
crimping, usually in a stuffer box crimper, which provides primarily a 
zigzag 2-dimensional type of crimp, as discussed, for example, by Halm et 
al in U.S. Pat. No. 5,112,684. A different and 3-dimensional type of 
crimp, however, can be provided in synthetic filaments by various means, 
such as appropriate asymmetric quenching or using bicomponent filaments, 
as reported, for example, by Marcus in U.S. Pat. No. 4,618,531, which was 
directed to providing refluffable fiberballs (sometimes referred to in the 
trade as "clusters") of randomly-arranged, entangled, spirally-crimped 
polyester fiberfill, and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,794,038, which was directed to 
providing fiberballs containing binder fiber (in addition to the polyester 
fiberfill) so the fiberballs containing binder fiber could be molded, for 
example, into useful bonded articles by activating the binder fibers. Such 
fiberballs of both types have been of great commercial interest, as has 
been the problem of providing improved polyester fiberfill having "spiral 
crimp". The term spiral crimp is frequently used in the art, but the 
processes used to provide synthetic filaments with a helical configuration 
(perhaps a more accurate term than spiral crimp) does not involve a 
"crimping" process, in a mechanical sense, but the synthetic filaments 
take up their helical configuration spontaneously during their formation 
and/or processing, as a result of differences between portions of the 
cross-sections of the filaments. For instance, asymmetric quenching can 
provide "spiral crimp" in monocomponent filaments, and bicomponent 
filaments of eccentric cross-section, preferably side-by-side but also 
with one component off-centered, can take up a helical configuration 
spontaneously. 
Polyester fibers having spiral crimp are sold commercially. For instance 
H18Y polyester fibers are available commercially from Unitika Ltd. of 
Japan, and 7-HCS polyester fibers are available commercially from Sam Yang 
of the Republic of Korea. Both of these commercially-available bicomponent 
polyester fibers are believed to derive their spiral crimp because of a 
difference in the viscosities (measured as intrinsic viscosity, IV, or as 
relative viscosity RV), i.e., a difference in molecular weight of the 
poly(ethylene terephthalate), used as the polymer for both components to 
make the bicomponent fiber. Use of differential viscosity (delta 
viscosity) to differentiate the 2 components presents problems and 
limitations, as will be discussed. This is primarily because spinning 
bicomponent polyester filaments of delta viscosity is difficult, i.e., it 
is easier to spin bicomponent filaments of the same viscosity, and there 
is a limit to the difference in viscosity that can be tolerated in 
practice. Since it is the delta viscosity that provides the desirable 
spiral crimp, this limit on the difference that can be tolerated 
correspondingly limits the amount of spiral crimp that can be obtained in 
a delta viscosity type of bicomponent filament. Accordingly it has been 
desirable to overcome these problems and limitations. 
Crimpable composite filaments have been disclosed by Shima et al, U.S. Pat. 
No. 3,520,770, by arranging two different components of polymeric ethylene 
glycol terephthalate polyesters eccentrically and in intimate adherence to 
each other along the whole length of the filaments, at least one of the 
said components being a branched polymeric ethylene glycol terephthalate 
polyester chemically modified with at least one branching agent having 3 
to 6 ester-forming functional groups and at least one of said components 
being an unbranched polymeric ethylene glycol terephthalate polyester. 
Shima taught use of such filaments in woven fabrics made of such cut 
staple filaments. Shima did not teach use of his bicomponent filaments as 
filling material. Shima did not provide any teaching regarding pillows, 
nor about filled articles, nor about filling materials. 
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
We have found, according to the present invention, that a difference 
between the chain-branched contents of polyester components can provide 
advantages in polyester bicomponent fibers for use as polyester fiberfill 
filling materials in filled articles, especially in pillows, and in new 
hollow polyester bicomponent fibers for such use. We use herein both terms 
"fiber" and "filament" inclusively without intending use of one term to 
exclude the other. 
According to one aspect of the invention, therefore, we provide a pillow 
filled with filling material that includes polyester fiberfill, said 
polyester fiberfill filling material comprising at least 10%, preferably 
at least 25%, and especially at least 50% by weight of bicomponent 
polyester fiberfill fibers of helical configuration that has resulted from 
a difference between chain-branched contents of polyester components of 
said bicomponent polyester fiberfill fibers. Preferably 100% of the 
filling material is such bicomponent fibers but, as will be understood, 
blends of filling materials may be used in practice by some operators, 
e.g., 10/90 or more, 25/75 or more, 50/50 or whatever may be considered 
desirable for any reason. 
As indicated, pillows are a very significant part of the market for filled 
articles, but this invention is not restricted only to pillows, and, 
accordingly, we provide, more generally, filled articles filled with 
filling material, said filling material comprising at least 10%, 
preferably at least 25%, and especially at least 50% by weight of 
bicomponent polyester fiberfill fibers of helical configuration that has 
resulted from a difference between chain-branched contents of polyester 
components of said bicomponent polyester fiberfill fibers. In particular, 
preferred such filled articles, according to the invention, include 
articles of apparel, such as parkas and other insulated or insulating 
articles of apparel, bedding materials (sometimes referred to as sleep 
products) other than pillows, including mattress pads, comforters and 
quilts including duvets, and sleeping bags and other filled articles 
suitable for camping purposes, for example, furnishing articles, such as 
cushions, "throw pillows" (which are not necessarily intended for use as 
bedding materials), and filled furniture itself, toys and, indeed, any 
articles that can be filled with polyester fiberfill. The remainder of the 
filling material may be other polyester filling material, which has an 
advantage of being washable, and is preferred, but other filling material 
may be used if desired. 
Such articles may be filled (at least in part) with fiberballs (clusters), 
in which the bicomponent polyester fiberfill fibers of helical 
configuration are randomly entangled into such fiberballs. Such may be 
moldable, on account of the presence of binder fiber, as disclosed by 
Marcus in U.S. Pat. No. 4,794,038, for example, and Halm et al in U.S. 
Pat. No. 5,112,684, or refluffable, as disclosed, for example by Marcus in 
U.S. Pat. No. 4,618,531 and also by Halm et al. 
Also provided, according to the invention, are such fiberballs themselves, 
wherein the bicomponent polyester fiberfill fibers of helical 
configuration are randomly entangled to form such fiberballs. 
Filled articles according to the invention also include articles wherein 
(at least some of) the filling material is in the form of batting, which 
may be bonded, if desired, or left unbonded. 
Preferably, (some at least of) such bicomponent polyester fiberfill fibers 
are hollow in filled articles, according to the invention, especially with 
multiple voids, i.e., contain more than one continuous voids along the 
fibers, as has been disclosed in the art. Particularly preferred are such 
fibers having three continuous voids, e.g., as disclosed hereinafter, with 
a round peripheral cross-section. We believe no one has disclosed how to 
spin round filaments with 3 holes. In other words, we believe this is a 
new cross-section for any fiber. 
Also provided, according to other aspects of the invention, are such new 
hollow bicomponent polyester fiberfill fibers themselves, and new 
processes and new spinnerets for making them, and other new processes, 
including for making filled articles. 
For example, a new process for preparing filled articles is provided 
according to the invention, wherein such articles are filled with 
fiberfill filling fibers that comprise at least 10% by weight of 
bicomponent polyester fiberfill fibers of helical configuration that has 
resulted from a difference between chain-branched contents of polyester 
components of said bicomponent polyester fiberfill fibers; as examples of 
such filled articles, as indicated herein, we specifically include a 
pillow, an article of apparel, a bedding material, a furnishing article or 
a toy. Examples of processes for preparing filled articles include those 
in which an article is filled with fiberfill fibers that are randomly 
entangled into fiberballs, and those in which an article is filled with 
filling material in the form of batting, including those wherein the 
batting or other filling material is bonded. 
Also provided, according to the present invention, is a process for 
preparing polyester bicomponent fibers of helical configuration and having 
one or more continuous voids throughout their fiber length, comprising the 
steps of post-coalescence melt-spinning polyester components that differ 
in their chain-branched contents, and that are arranged eccentrically with 
respect to each other, into filaments through segmented spinning capillary 
orifices so the resulting freshly-spun molten streams coalesce and form 
continuous filaments having one or more continuous voids throughout their 
fiber length, and having an eccentric bicomponent cross-section, and 
quenching to solidify the filaments, and of developing the helical 
configuration by drawing the resultant solid filaments and heating to 
relax them, and preferably such process wherein the fibers are slickened. 
Further provided, according to the present invention, is included a process 
for preparing polyester bicomponent fibers of helical configuration, 
comprising the steps of melt-spinning polyester components that differ in 
their chain-branched contents, and that are arranged eccentrically with 
respect to each other, into filaments through spinning capillary orifices 
to form continuous filaments having an eccentric bicomponent 
cross-section, quenching to solidify the filaments, drawing the resultant 
solid filaments, coating the drawn filaments with a slickener, and heating 
to relax the filaments and develop the helical configuration. 
Such processes for preparing new polyester bicomponent fibers according to 
the present invention include those wherein the continuous filaments are 
converted to staple fiber. A particularly advantageous such process 
includes one wherein the staple fiber is formed into fiberballs having a 
random distribution and entanglement of fibers within each ball, and 
having an average diameter of 2-20 mm, and wherein the individual fibers 
have a length of 10-100 mm. 
Preferably, at least some bicomponent polyester fiberfill fibers are 
slickened in the filled articles, according to the invention, i.e., are 
coated with a durable slickener, as disclosed in the art. As disclosed 
hereinafter, a blend (mixture) of slickened and unslickened bicomponent 
polyester fiberfill fibers according to the invention may have processing 
advantages. 
Also provided, according to another aspect of the invention are such new 
slickened bicomponent polyester fiberfill fibers themselves.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
As indicated, an important aspect of the invention is a novel use for 
bicomponent polyester fibers of helical configuration that has resulted 
from a difference between chain-branched contents of polyester components 
of said bicomponent polyester fibers. The idea of using a difference 
(between one component being unbranched polymeric ethylene glycol 
terephthalate polyester and another component being branched with at least 
one branching agent having 3 to 6 ester-forming functional groups) in a 
bicomponent polyester filament for use in woven fabrics has already been 
disclosed by Shima (et al, U.S. Pat. No. 3,520,770) more than 20 years 
earlier. Chain-branching for polyester fiberfill purposes has also been 
disclosed in EP published application 0,294,912 (DP-4210) in a different 
context entirely. Examples of technology for making such chain-branched 
polyester polymer have accordingly already been disclosed in this art (the 
disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference), and it 
would be redundant to repeat such technology herein. In practice, it will 
generally be preferred to use unbranched polyester polymer as one 
component, and a chain-branched polymer as the other component, as did 
Shima, and it will generally be preferred to use the unbranched polyester 
polymer as the major component, since unbranched polymer is cheaper. 
Neither of these is, however, necessary, and it may sometimes, for 
instance, be desirable for both components to be chain-branched, with 
differences between the chain-branching in order to provide the desired 
helical configuration, as shown, for example, in Example 4 hereinafter. 
Similarly, it may be desirable to make the bicomponent filament from more 
than two components, but, in practice, only two components are likely to 
be preferred. Shima was not concerned with the field of the present 
invention, namely filled articles, such as and especially pillows, and 
their filling materials, and did not disclose how to make such articles. 
Although Shima disclosed his own preferred techniques for making 
chain-branched polymer and bicomponent polyester fibers, we prefer to use 
somewhat different techniques, as disclosed hereinafter, especially in our 
Examples. Shima disclosed formulas for calculating upper and lower limits 
(mole %) for the amounts of his (chain-)branching agents; these meant 
that, for a trifunctional agent, such as trimethylolethane (or trimethyl 
trimellitate, which has been used successfully by us), 0.267 to 3.2 mole % 
should be used; for pentaerythritol having 4 functional groups, his limits 
were 0.1 to 1.2 mole %; Shima taught that if lower amounts were used, 
bicomponent filaments having satisfactory crimpability could not be 
obtained. In contrast to Shima's negative teaching against using lower 
amounts of chain-branching agent, we prefer to use 0.14 mole % of 
trimethyl trimellitate (a trifunctional chain-branching agent), as can be 
seen in our Examples (in combination with unbranched homopolymer, i.e., 
2G-T). 0.14 mole % of a trifunctional chain-brancher is only about half as 
much as the lowest amount that Shima indicated had to be used to obtain 
satisfactory crimpability; we doubt (from incomplete experimentation) that 
0.07 mole % gives adequate spontaneous crimp; so we prefer to use more, at 
least 0.09 mole %, or about 0.1 mole %; we believe we can use as much as 
about 0.25 mole %; Shima was successful with larger amounts, as he 
indicated. Shima preferred to use a terminating (or end-capping) agent 
with his branching agent, so as to be able to exceed his upper limit of 
branching agent; we find this unnecessary, at least in our preferred 
operation, as can be seen, and we prefer to avoid this. 
Shima did not disclose the relative proportions of modified 
(chain-branched) 2G-T to unmodified 2G-T in his Examples or elsewhere. We 
have assumed he used a 50:50 ratio. We have found that useful bicomponent 
fiberfill can result from as little as 8% by weight chain-branched 2G-T 
(using 0.14 mole %), i.e., an 8:92 weight ratio in the bicomponent 
fiberfill. 
We have also found it possible to spin useful fiberfill filaments with 
voids, as indicated herein, and also filaments of non-round cross-section. 
This was not taught by Shima, and we doubt that would have been possible 
using the technology expressly taught by Shima. 
Reverting to the field of the invention, namely filled articles and their 
filling with polyester fiberfill, the bicomponent polyester fiberfill 
fibers of the present invention have important advantages over 
bicomponents available commercially hitherto as follows: 
1--Our polymer selection allows us to spin solid, 1-hole, or multi hole 
cross sections as self-crimping fibers. We can thus tailor the 
cross-section to several different particular end use needs. We have 
demonstrated solid, 1-hole, 3-hole and 7-hole fibers of round 
cross-section peripherally. A round peripheral cross-section is generally 
preferred for use as fiberfill filling material. We have also, however, 
succeeded in spinning 3-hole fibers of approximately triangular 
cross-section from bicomponent polymer systems according to the present 
invention. In effect, we believe that, if a capillary can be used to spin 
a conventional fiber we can spin a self-crimping bicomponent with that 
capillary; this is because we have been able to match the melt viscosities 
of the different component polymers that we use to spin bicomponent 
filaments according to our invention. 
2--We can vary and have varied the polymer ratio to obtain levels of crimp 
from no crimp to microcrimp. With other technologies such as delta RV, 
there is not enough differential between the polymers to allow straying 
too far from 50/50 (equal amounts of each component of different RV). 
3--We can use and have used a single spinneret to spin a variety of crimp 
levels by changing the polymer ratio. Other technologies would require 
changing the capillary geometry if the polymer ratio were changed 
significantly. As indicated, we have demonstrated polymer ratios varying 
from less than 10:90 wt. ratio to equal amounts (50:50). 
4--We believe the use of these two higher viscosity polymers (both 
components being of higher viscosity) vs. delta RV results in a more 
durable crimp. 
5--We can make void contents up to 40% in a "spiral crimp" fiber, whereas 
fibers of such high void content would collapse at the nodes if 
mechanically-crimped. 
6--We were surprised to find that the crimp development did not depend on 
the draw ratio selected, but on the polymer ratio selected. Thus, we were 
surprised to find we got the same crimp level even when a draw ratio was 
varied from 2.5.times. to 5.times.. This is an important and surprising 
advantage in processing, since it enables a manufacturer to maintain a 
constant level of crimp despite fluctuations in drawing conditions. 
Suitable filament deniers will generally range from 1.5 to 20 dtex for the 
final drawn fiberfill, 2-16 dtex being preferred in most cases, and 4-10 
dtex being generally most preferred, it being understood that blends of 
different deniers may often be desirable, especially with the current 
interest in low deniers (e.g. microdeniers), especially for insulating 
and/or aesthetic purposes. 
As indicated, we believe that the bicomponent "spiral crimp" polyester 
fibers that are commercially available (H18Y and 7-HCS) use both 
components of ethylene terephthaiate homopolymer (2G-T), but with 
differing viscosities (RV for relative viscosity). We have found that a 
delta (difference) of about 6 RV units is the only delta that is easily 
spinnable and that gives good bicomponent spiral crimp, that a delta less 
than about 6 RV units can be spun but gives low "spiral crimp", whereas it 
is difficult to spin filaments with a delta higher than about 6 RV units. 
We believe H-18Y has an average RV of 17.9 LRV (LRV is measured as 
disclosed in Example 1 of Broaddus U.S. Pat No. 5,104,725) which means 
that we believe H-18Y is probably a 50/50 side-by-side bicomponent of 2G-T 
polymers of 15 LRV and of 21 LRV. We believe 7-HCS has an average LRV of 
15, which means that we believe 7-HCS is probably a 50/50 side-by-side 
bicomponent of 2G-T polymers of 12 LRV and of 18 LRV. In contrast, with a 
combination of chain-branched and unbranched 2G-T polymers we can spin 
filaments according to the invention of equivalent LRVs, and indeed the 
LRV of the blend of polymers that we used in our Examples was measured at 
22.7. 
Of particular interest, as indicated, are round multivoid bicomponent 
filaments according to the invention and slickened bicomponent filaments 
according to the invention, both of which are believed to be new. A 
preferred round multivoid filament is now described and illustrated in the 
accompanying Drawings. 
Referring to the accompanying Drawings, FIG. 1 is a photograph to show 
several cross-sections of 3-hole bicomponent filaments spun from a 
spinneret capillary as shown in FIG. 2. Three voids (holes) can clearly be 
seen in each of the filaments shown in FIG. 1, but the borderline between 
the two components is not so visible, so an enlarged photograph of another 
3-hole filament cross-section (82/18 proportions of the two components) is 
provided stained for this purpose in FIG. 3. Referring to FIG. 3, the 
filament generally is indicated by reference numeral 11, and contains 
three voids 12. Two polymeric components 13 and 14 are shown in FIG. 3, 
with a clearly defined borderline between these different components. This 
boundary was visible after the filament cross-section had been stained 
with osmium tetroxide, which stained the components differently so the 
borderline shows up better in FIG. 3 than in FIG. 1. In this instance, all 
three voids 11 are shown located within the majority polymeric component 
13. It will be understood that this will not and need not necessarily 
happen, so long as there is an eccentric arrangement, especially when more 
of a second component is present than shown in FIG. 3 for component 14. 
The filaments have round (circular) peripheral cross-section, which is 
important and preferred for fiberfill materials. 
FIG. 2 shows a spinneret capillary for spinning filaments with three voids. 
It will be noted that the capillary is segmented, with three segments 21 
disposed symmetrically around an axis or central point C. Each segment 21 
consists of two slots, namely a peripheral arcuate slot 22 (width E) and a 
radial slot 23 (width G), the middle of the inside edge of peripheral 
arcuate slot 22 being joined to the outer end of radial slot 23, so each 
segment forms a kind of "T-shape" with the top of the T being curved 
convexly to form an arc of a circle. Each peripheral arcuate slot 22 
extends almost 120.degree. around the circumference of the circle. Each 
radial slot 23 comes to a point 24 at its inner end. Points 24 are spaced 
from central point C. Outer diameter H of the capillary is defined by the 
distance between the outer edges of peripheral arcuate slots 22. Each 
peripheral arcuate slot 22 is separated from its neighbor by a distance F, 
which is referred to as a "tab". 
The short faces of neighboring peripheral arcuate slots 22 on either side 
of each tab are parallel to each other and parallel to the radius that 
bisects such tab. In many respects, the capillary design shown in FIG. 2 
is typical of designs used in the art to provide hollow filaments by 
post-coalescence spinning through segmented orifices. A segmented design 
for post-coalescence spinning 4-hole filaments is shown, for example, by 
Champaneria et al in U.S. Pat. No. 3,745,061. Points 24 at the inner ends 
of radial slots 23 are provided in the spinneret capillary design shown in 
FIG. 2, however, to improve coalescence of the polymer at the center of 
the filament, i.e., to ensure that the three voids do not become 
connected. 
TEST METHODS 
The parameters mentioned herein are standard parameters and are mentioned 
in the art referenced herein, as are methods for measuring them. Since 
methods of measuring bulk of pillows can vary, the method we used to test 
the pillows in our Examples is summarized briefly: 
Pillows fabricated from a filling material having the most effective bulk 
or filling power will have the greatest center height. The Initial Height 
of the center of a pillow under zero load is determined by mashing in the 
opposite corners of the pillow several times (refluffing) and placing the 
pillow on the load-sensitive table of an Instron tester and measuring and 
recording its (Initial) Height at zero load. The Instron tester is 
equipped with a metal disc presser foot that is 4 in. (10.2 cm.) in 
diameter. The presser foot is then caused to compress the pillow by 
continuously increasing the load until 20 lbs. (9.08 kg) is applied. The 
load required to compress the center section of the pillow to 50% of the 
Initial Height under zero load is measured and this load-to-half-height is 
recorded as the "Firmness" of the pillow. 
Before the actual compression cycle in which the Initial Height and 
Firmness are measured and recorded, the pillow is subjected to one 
complete cycle of 20 lbs (9.08 kg) compression and load release for 
conditioning. Pillows having higher load-to-half-height values are more 
resistant to deformation and thus provide greater support bulk. 
Bulk and Firmness durability are determined by submitting the filling 
material in the pillow to repeated cycles of compression and load release, 
followed by a washing and drying cycle. Such repeated cycles, or workings, 
of the pillows are carried out by placing a pillow on a turntable 
associated with 2 pairs of 4.times.12 inch (10.2.times.30.5 cm) 
air-powered worker feet which are mounted above the turntable in such a 
fashion that, during one revolution, essentially the entire contents are 
subjected to compression and release. Compression is accomplished by 
powering the worker feet with 80 lbs. per square inch (5.62 kg/square cm.) 
gauge air pressure such that they exert a static load of approximately 125 
lbs (56.6 kg) when in contact with the turntable. The turntable rotates at 
a speed of one revolution per 110 seconds and each of the worker feet 
compresses and releases the filling material 17 times per minute. After 
being repeatedly compressed and released for a specified period of time, 
the pillow is refluffed by mashing in the opposite corners several times. 
As before, the pillow is subjected to a conditioning cycle and the Initial 
Height and Firmness (load-to-half-height) are determined. The pillow is 
then subjected to a normal home laundry washing and drying cycle. After 
drying it is again refluffed by mashing in the opposite corners several 
time and allowed to stand overnight. After this conditioning period, the 
pillow is again measured for Initial Height and Firmness 
(load-to-half-height) using the Instron technique above, and recording 
measurements after one complete cycle. 
Properties of the fibers are mostly measured essentially as described by 
Tolliver in U.S. Pat. No. 3,772,137, the fiber bulk measurements being 
referred to herein as "Initial Bulk" and "Support Bulk" (to avoid 
confusion with the heights measured for the pillows. Friction, however, is 
measured by the SPF (Staple Pad Friction) method, as described 
hereinafter, and for example, in allowed U.S. application Ser. No. 
08/406,355. 
As used herein, a staple pad of the fibers whose friction is to be measured 
is sandwiched between a weight on top of the staple pad and a base that is 
underneath the staple pad and is mounted on the lower crosshead of an 
Instron 1122 machine (product of Instron Engineering Corp., Canton, 
Mass.). 
The staple pad is prepared by carding the staple fibers (using a 
SACO-Lowell roller top card) to form a batt which is cut into sections, 
that are 4.0 ins in length and 2.5 ins wide, with the fibers oriented in 
the length dimension of the batt. Enough sections are stacked up so the 
staple pad weighs 1.5 g. The weight on top of the staple pad is of length 
(L) 1.88 ins, width (W) 1.52 ins, and height (H) 1.46 ins, and weighs 496 
gm. The surfaces of the weight and of the base that contact the staple pad 
are covered with Emery cloth (grit being in 220-240 range), so that it is 
the Emery cloth that makes contact with the surfaces of the staple pad. 
The staple pad is placed on the base. The weight is placed on the middle 
of the pad. A nylon monofil line is attached to one of the smaller 
vertical (W.times.H) faces of the weight and passed around a small pulley 
up to the upper crosshead of the Instron, making a 90 degree wrap angle 
around the pulley. 
A computer interfaced to the Instron is given a signal to start the test. 
The lower crosshead of the Instron is moved down at a speed of 12.5 
in/min. The staple pad, the weight and the pulley are also moved down with 
the base, which is mounted on the lower crosshead. Tension increases in 
the nylon monofil as it is stretched between the weight, which is moving 
down, and the upper crosshead, which remains stationary. Tension is 
applied to the weight in a horizontal direction, which is the direction of 
orientation of the fibers in the staple pad. Initially, there is little or 
no movement within the staple pad. The force applied to the upper 
crosshead of the Instron is monitored by a load cell and increases to a 
threshold level, when the fibers in the pad start moving past each other. 
(Because of the Emery cloth at the interfaces with the staple pad, there 
is little relative motion at these interfaces; essentially any motion 
results from fibers within the staple pad moving past each other.) The 
threshold force level indicates what is required to overcome the 
fiber-to-fiber static friction and is recorded. 
The coefficient of friction is determined by dividing the measured 
threshold force by the 496 gm weight. Eight values are used to compute the 
average SPF. These eight values are obtained by making four determinations 
on each of two staple pad samples. 
The invention is further illustrated in the following Examples; all parts 
and percentages are by weight, unless otherwise indicated. The spinneret 
capillary used for spinning 3-hole polyester fiber in the Examples was as 
illustrated in FIG. 2, with the following dimensions in inches: H (outer 
diameter) 0.060 inches; E (width of slot 22), F (tab) and G (width of slot 
23) all 0.004 inches; points 24 were defined by the faces at the inner end 
of each radial slot 23 on either side of point 24, each such face being 
aligned with a short face at the extremity of the corresponding peripheral 
arcuate slot 22, i.e., on one side of a tab of width F, so as to provide 
corresponding distances also of width F (0.004 inches) between each pair 
of parallel faces at the inner ends of each pair of radial slots 23. The 
capillary slots were of depth 0.010 inches, and were fed from a reservoir 
as shown in FIG. 6A of U.S. Pat. No. 5,356,582 (Aneja et al) and with a 
meter plate registered for spinning side-by-side bicomponent filaments, as 
disclosed in the art. 
EXAMPLE 1 
Bicomponent fibers according to the invention were produced from two 
different component polymers, both of 0.66 IV. One component polymer (A) 
was 2G-T, homopoly(ethylene terephthalate), while the other component 
polymer (B) contained 0.14 mole %, 3500 ppm, of trimellitate 
chain-brancher (analyzed as trimethyl trimellitate, but added as 
trihydroxyethyl trimellitate). Each was processed simultaneously through a 
separate screw melter at a combined polymer throughput of 190 lbs/hr. (86 
kg/hr). Use of a meter plate with orifices just above each of 1176 
spinneret capillaries allowed these molten polymers to be combined in a 
side-by-side manner in a ratio of 80% (A) and 20% (B) and spun into 
filaments at 0.162 lbs/hr/capillary (0.074 kg/hr/capillary) and 500 ypm 
(457 m/min). The post-coalescent capillaries (FIG. 2) were designed to 
give fibers with three equi-spaced and equi-sized voids parallel to the 
fiber axis. The resulting hollow fibers (of spun denier=25 and void 
content 12.5%) were quenched in a cross-flow manner with air at 55.degree. 
F. (18.degree. C.). The spun fibers were grouped together to form a rope 
(relaxed tow denier of 360,000). This rope was drawn in a hot wet spray 
draw zone maintained at 95.degree. C. using a draw ratio of 3.5.times.. 
The drawn filaments were coated with a slickening agent containing a 
polyaminosiloxane and laid down with an air jet on a conveyor. The 
filaments in the rope on the conveyor were now observed to have helical 
crimp. The (crimped) rope was relaxed in an oven at 175.degree. C., after 
which it was cooled, and an antistatic finish was applied at about 0.5% by 
weight, after which the rope was cut in a conventional manner to 3 in. (76 
mm). The finished product had a denier per filament of 8.9. The fibers had 
a cross section similar to that shown in FIG. 3 (which fiber actually 
contained slightly different (82/18) proportions of polymer A/B), 
containing three continuous voids which were parallel and substantially 
equal in size and substantially equi-spaced from each other. The periphery 
of the fiber was round and smooth. Various properties of the fibers were 
measured and are compared in Table 1A with commercial bicomponent fibers 
of the delta-RV type marketed by Unitika (Japan) and Sam Yang (South 
Korea). 
Pillows were prepared from cut bicomponent staples of the Example above and 
also from the commercially available 6-H18Y (Unitika) and 7-HCS (Sam Yang) 
were opened by passing them through a picker and then processing on a 
garnett (such as a single cylinder double doffer model manufactured by 
James Hunter Machine Co. of North Adams, Mass.). Two webs of opened fibers 
were combined and rolled up to form pillow batting. The weight of each 
pillow was adjusted to 18 oz. (509) gm) and each was then conveyed into 20 
in. (51 cm).times.26 in. (66 cm) tickings of 200 count 100% cotton fabric 
using a Bemiss pillow stuffer. The pillows (after a refluffing) were 
measured for Initial Height and Firmness, which are shown in Table 1B. 
The 18 oz (509 gm) pillows of the invention made by this Example have very 
good filling power, much more so than typical mechanically-crimped 
slickened fibers, to the extent that we believe that such a pillow filled 
with as little as 18 oz of our novel hollow bicomponent spiral crimp fiber 
can provide as much filling power in a pillow as a prior art pillow filled 
with 20 oz of commercial mechanically crimped fiber, which is a 
significant saving; there is also an economic advantage in avoiding the 
need to use a stuffer box (for mechanical crimping) which can also risk 
damaging the fibers. These pillows had Initial Height superior to 7-HCS 
and about equivalent to H-18Y. In contrast to 18 oz (509 gm) pillows with 
good filling power of the art, these pillows of Example 1 were firm. Their 
Firmness was greater than for either competitive fiber. 
An important advantage of pillows of the invention (and of our novel 
filling fiber therein) over pillows filled with prior 
commercially-available spiral crimp fiber is also the versatility and 
flexibility that use of our technology provides, as will be shown in 
Example 
TABLE 1A 
______________________________________ 
Physical Properties of Bicomponent Fibers 
Item Example 1 H18Y 7-HCS 
______________________________________ 
DPF 8.9 6.0 7.0 
Crimp/in (/cm) 6.1 (15.5) 5.0 (12.7) 
5.4 (11.9) 
% void 11.4 25.1 3.8 
TBRM 
Initial Bulk, In. (cm) 
5.56 (14.1) 
5.81 (14.8) 
5.76 (14.6) 
Support Bulk, In. (cm) 
0.66 (1.68) 
0.56 (1.42) 
0.36 (0.91) 
Staple Pad Friction 
0.353 0.262 0.246 
% silicon 0.324 0.210 0.215 
______________________________________ 
TABLE 1B 
______________________________________ 
Properties of 18 oz. rolled batting pillows 
Item Example 1 H18Y 7-HCS 
______________________________________ 
Initial Height in (cm) 
8.98 (19.8) 
9.18 (23.3) 
7.69 (19.5) 
Firmness lbs (kg) 
7.97 (3.62) 
7.04 (3.20) 
3.29 (1.50) 
______________________________________ 
EXAMPLE 2 
A series of bicomponent fibers according to the invention with differing 
crimp frequencies were prepared by varying the ratio of the two polymer 
components, A and B, of Example 1. The proportion of polymer A was varied 
from 70% up to 84% as the proportion of polymer B was varied from 30% down 
to 16% as shown in Table 3. Using the same spinning process as in Example 
1, the differing polymer combinations were spun into a series of 
bicomponent fibers having visually different crimp frequencies. Their 
physical properties are given in Table 2. Each of these fibers was 
converted into standard roll batting pillows as in Example 1. The 
properties of the pillows are given in Table 2. In general, an increase in 
pillow Firmness was noted as the content of polymer B in the fiber was 
increased from 16% to 22%, corresponding to the increase in crimp 
frequency obtained for the bicomponent fibers, a B polymer content of 22% 
giving a crimp frequency of about 7 cpi and a pillow Firmness of about 10 
lbs, both of which are even better than those of the pillow of Example 1 
which, in turn, had values better than those of the commercially available 
products (as shown in Table 1), while a B polymer content of 30% gave an 
even higher void content and good values of crimp frequency and Firmness. 
TABLE 2 
______________________________________ 
PROPERTIES OF FIBERS AND PILLOWS IN CRIMP SERIES 
Item A B C D 
______________________________________ 
% polymer A 70 78 80 84 
% polymer B 30 22 20 16 
DPF 8.7 8.8 8.9 9.6 
Crimp/in (/cm) 
6.8 (17.3) 
7.1 (18.0) 
5.7 (14.5) 
3.9 (9.90) 
% void 14.6 11.4 11.5 9.4 
TBRM 
Initial Bulk, In (cm) 
4.52 (11.5) 
5.24 (13.3) 
5.54 (14.1) 
5.64 (14.3) 
Support Bulk, In (cm) 
0.95 (2.4) 
0.82 (2.1) 
0.65 (1.7) 
0.50 (1.3 
SPF 0.558 0.405 0.355 0.294 
% silicon 0.313 0.317 0.324 0.303 
Pillow: 
Initial Height, in (cm) 
9.40 (23.9) 
9.14 (23.2) 
8.98 (22.8) 
9.16 (23.3) 
Firmness, lbs (kg) 
9.20 (4.18) 
10.02 (4.55) 
7.97 (3.62) 
6.33 (2.87) 
______________________________________ 
Preferred proportions of the different polymers in bicomponent fibers 
according to our invention range upwards from about 8/92, e.g., from about 
5/95 to 30/70. In Example 2, one component was branched with 3500 ppm 
(measured as disclosed above) of a chain-brancher which is preferred for 
reasons discussed in EPA published application 0,294,912, but other 
chain-branchers as disclosed therein and by Shima may, if desired, be 
used, and, with this preferred chain-brancher, such proportions correspond 
to crimp frequencies of about 2-8 CPI, respectively. Even 50/50 
bicomponent proportions would be expected to be useful if modifications 
were made to various features, such as the amount of chain-brancher, for 
instance using about 700 ppm, whereas proportions of 10/90 might give 
useful results with as much as 17,500 ppm (the chain-brancher being 
measured as disclosed above) 
Preferred void contents in bicomponent hollow fibers according to our 
invention range from 5% up to 40%, especially 10-30%. 
EXAMPLE 3 
Because opened slickened bicomponent fibers give such weak web cohesion 
that some find it difficult to combine the webs into batting and to handle 
the batting in a pillow ticking stuffing operation; we combined a minor 
proportion of unslickened fibers with a majority of slickened fibers in 
the cutting operation. A 75%/25% slickened/unslickened blend was prepared 
by cutting three 390,000 denier ropes of the slickened fiber from item B 
in Example 2 combined with one equivalent rope of the same bicomponent 
fiber to which no silicone slickener had been applied. The resulting 
staple blend (cut length 3 inches, 7.6 cm) had a noted increase in 
fiber-fiber friction as measured by an SPF increase from 0.391 to 0.412. 
This blend was processed easily on a garnett with much improved 
operability vs. the all-slickened product of item B of Example 2 into 
batting of weight 18 oz and into a pillow for comparison with the pillow 
of the all-slick product in Example 2, item B. A comparison of pillow 
properties in Table 3 before and after 1 stomp/wash/dry cycle shows that 
the addition of unslickened fiber did not adversely affect the 
advantageous properties of the pillow. 
TABLE 3 
______________________________________ 
Properties of Blended Bicomponent Pillows 
75/25 
slickened/non-slick blend 
all-slick 
height firmness height firmness 
in (cm) lbs (kg) in (cm) 
(kg) 
______________________________________ 
Before cycle 
9.16 (23.3) 
9.68 (4.40) 
9.14 (23.2) 
10.02 (4.55) 
After 1 cycle 
9.06 (23.0) 
6.70 (3.05) 
9.01 (22.9) 
7.00 (3.18) 
______________________________________ 
The proportions of slickened to unslickened bicomponent polyester fiberfill 
fibers may be varied as desired for aesthetic purposes and/or as needed or 
desirable for processing, e.g. as little as 5 or 10% of one type of fiber, 
or more, and the 25/75 mixture used in Example 3 is not intended to be 
limiting and may not even be optimum for some purposes. 
EXAMPLE 4 
Bicomponent fibers according to the invention were produced from two 
different component polymers, (B) and (C), and were used to show that 
useful bicomponent fibers can be prepared and used as fiberfill according 
to the invention when both component polymers contain branching agent, the 
amounts of branching agent being different. A polymer (C) (of 0.66 IV) 
with 175 ppm of trimellitate chain brancher was prepared by blending the 
two polymers of Example 1 in a ratio of 95% of component polymer (A), 
homopoly(ethylene terephthalate), to 5% of component polymer (B) (which 
contained 3500 ppm of trimellitate chain-brancher). Polymer (C) and 
polymer (B) of Example 1 were then processed simultaneously into 
side-by-side bicomponent filaments having three voids, following 
essentially the procedure described in Example 1, except as indicated, 
through separate 1.0 in (2.54 cm) screw melters at a combined polymer 
throughput of 22.3 lbs/hr (10.1 kg/hr), and a meter plate above a 144 
capillary post-coalescent spinneret to combine polymer (C) and polymer (B) 
in a 78/22 ratio, respectively, to spin (three void side-by-side 
bicomponent) filaments at 0.155 lbs/hr/capillary (0.070 kg/hr/capillary), 
at 500 yds/min (457 m/min) spinning speed. The resulting filaments had a 
single filament denier of 23 (25.2 dtex) and 20.8% void. These filaments 
were then combined to form a rope (relaxed tow denier of 51,800) which was 
drawn in a hot wet spray draw zone at 95.degree. C. using a draw ratio of 
3.5.times.. The drawn filaments were coated with a polyaminosilicone 
slickener (same as used in Example 1), laid down on a conveyor, and 
relaxed in an oven, heated at 170.degree. C., after which an antistatic 
finish was applied. The resultant fibers had denier per filament of 8.4 
(9.2 dtex), Crimp Frequency of 2.8 crimps/in (7.1 crimps/cm), Crimp 
Take-up of 30%, Initial TBRM Bulk of 5.99 in (15.2 cm) and Support TBRM 
Bulk of 0.32 in (0.81 cm), and SPF fiber-fiber friction of 0.265. A sample 
of this fiber was cut to 1.5 in (38 mm), processed on a 36 in (91 cm) 
Rando opener (Rando/CMC, Gastonia, N.C.), and 18 oz. (509 gm) of the 
resulting opened staple was blown into a 20.times.26 in (51.times.66 cm) 
ticking of 80/20 polyester/cotton. The pillow's initial Height was 7.7 in. 
(19.25 cm) and Firmness was 3.9 kg. 
EXAMPLE 5 
To show improvement achievable by blending some bicomponent fibers into 
mechanically-crimped fiberfill, even at low blend levels, two-inch (51 mm) 
staple fibers of the 9 dpf (10 dtex) slickened bicomponent fiber of 
Example 1 were blended in amounts of both 15% and 30%, with 85% and 70%, 
respectively, of DuPont DACRON T-233A, which is a blend of 55% 1.65 dpf 
slickened 2G-T solid fibers, 27% 1.65 dpf non-slickened 2G-T solid fibers 
and 18% 4dpf sheath-core binder fiber, the core being 2G-T, and the sheath 
being lower melting copolyester, and the resulting battings are compared 
in the Table herein with a comparable batting of 100% T-233A. The blends 
were processed essentially as described in application Ser. No. 
08/542,975, being filed by Kwok simultaneously herewith. The blends were 
processed on a garnett into battings, which were crosslapped and sprayed 
with 18% of an acrylic resin (Rohm & Haas 3267). The resin was cured and 
the battings were bonded by passing through an oven heated at 150.degree. 
C. The resultant battings were measured for thickness under a 0.002 psi 
load using a MEASURE-MATIC" thickness measuring device (CertainTeed Corp., 
Valley Forge, Pa.) and for CLO insulation value using a Rapid-K tester 
(Dynatech R/D Co. Cambridge, Mass.). The measured thickness and CLO values 
are shown in the following Table after being normalized to equivalent 
batting weight, so as to be able to compare the CLO values. Those battings 
containing bicomponent fiber were more bulky (somewhat thicker), and had 
significantly higher CLO insulation values than the batting containing 
only T-233A. 
______________________________________ 
Batting Wt. 
Batting Thickness 
CLO 
g/m.sup.2 
cm/g/m.sup.2 CLO/g/m.sup.2 
______________________________________ 
T-233A 115 0.0113 0.0151 
85/15 Blend 
115 0.0119 0.0176 
70/30 Blend 
113 0.0135 0.0189 
______________________________________ 
EXAMPLE 6 
Component polymers (A) and (B) of Example 1 were combined in an 82/18 (A/B) 
ratio to spin side-by-side bicomponent filaments having three voids, and 
of 14.8 dpf (16.3 dtex) at a total throughput of 140 lbs/hr (63.6 kg/hr), 
using a spinneret with 1176 capillaries and a spinning speed of 600 yd/min 
(548 m/min), and otherwise essentially as described in Example 1. These 
filaments had void content of 11.4%, and were combined to form a rope of 
relaxed denier of 400,000, and were drawn 3.5.times., opened in an air 
jet, coated with 0.7% of an aminosilicone slickener, relaxed at 
165.degree. C. and coated with an antistatic finish. The rope was cut to 
0.75 in. (19 mm) staple, and the staple was processed to make fiberballs 
as described by Kirkbride in U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,783, at 800 lb/hr (364 
kg/hr). When characterized as described by Marcus U.S. Pat. No. 4,618,531, 
the fiberballs were essentially round, and their bulk values at loads of 
0, 5, 88.5, and 121.5 Newtons were 33.7, 28.8, 9.6, and 7.1 cm, 
respectively. These fiberballs were then blown into tickings to produce 
pillows and cushions.