Phase locked loop circuit

A Phase Locked Loop circuit, includes: a main path through which an input signal is propagated, and an actual signal is output; a main feedback path through which the actual signal is fed back to an input stage of the main path; and a local feedback path through which feedback is carried out from a path middle of the main path to a path middle of an input stage side; the main path including a phase detector, a loop filter, and a controlled oscillator, and the local feedback path including a replica portion, a delay portion, a first subtracter, and a second subtracter.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a Phase Locked Loop (PLL) circuit, and more particularly to a PLL circuit containing therein dead time.

2. Description of the Related Art

The evolution of signal processing from analog to digital results in that complicated processing which had been difficult to carry out is realized in related art, and problems in process variation are fundamentally dissolved.

On the other hand, however, the signal processing based on the digital implementation has a tendency to increase delay due to the digital processing.

Although this increase is not a problem so much when a signal flows in one direction, in loop processing in the PLL or the like, a system is easy to become instable.

In a control theory, this delay is referred to as “dead time,” and is distinguished from “delay time” which occurs in a low-pass filter or the like.

The PLL containing the dead time in the loop appears in various kinds of actual applications such as storage, a communication or a broadcasting.

As well known in the control theory, this dead time causes the loop characteristics to be unstable, and deteriorates stabilization characteristics.

A Smith method has been known from time immemorial as a method of compensating for the dead time in the loop. The Smith method is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,141,982, Filed on Jan. 6, 1960, Patented on Jul. 21, 1964, “CONTROL SYSTEM FOR USE IN CONTROL OF LOOPS WITH DEAD TIME” by Otto J. M. Smith.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

However, the Smith method supposes a feedback control system for a plant, and thus cannot be used in the PLL circuit as it is.

With regard to one of the difficulties resulting from the use application of the Smith method, a control amount is a virtual amount called as “a phase,” and thus steadily increases with time. The Smith method is a system based on the premise of following a step-like input change, and thus cannot be applied to a ramp input.

Another problem about the Smith method is such that a Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO) (or a mechanism corresponding to the VCO) as a constituent element of the PLL circuit operates as a perfect integrator. Since the Smith method compensates for the dead time by using a replica of the object of the control, it is deduced that the Smith method cannot be used in such an unstable system.

The extension of the Smith method for the lossless integrator system has been variously tried. One extension of the Smith method for the lossless integrator system, for example, is described in M. R. Matausek and A. D. Micic, “A modified Smith Predictor for controlling a process with an integrator and long dead-time,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, Vol 41, No. 8, pp. 1199 to 1203, August 1996 (hereinafter referred to as Non-Patent Document 1).

However, the method proposed by M. R. Matausek and A. D. Micic is also limited to the control object falling under the same category as that supposed by Otto J. M. Smith. Thus, the method proposed by M. R. Matausek and A. D. Micic cannot cope with the ramp input which endlessly increases such as phase in the PLL circuit. In addition, any tries to apply the Smith method to the PLL containing therein the dead time have not been found out until now.

On the other hand, a method originating from the different idea is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,236,343, Filed on May 13, 1999, Patented on May 22, 2001, “Loop Latency compensated PLL,” by A. Patapoutian. This method is such that a configuration of a Kalman Predictor is applied to the PLL circuit, and thus is a superior method in principle. However the Kalman Predictor itself is merely an estimation mechanism, and thus how the loop characteristics are designed remains as another problem.

In addition, any descriptions on an overflow problem for an internal description of phase which infinitely increases is not found out.

Hereinafter, a problem when the Smith method is simply applied to the PLL circuit will be discussed in detail.

When the loop characteristics of the PLL circuit is discussed, usually, a block diagram is used in which steadily increasing phase is omitted. The reason for this is because although the phase of the input signal increases approximately at a constant frequency, since the PLL forms a closed loop so as to control a phase difference between the input signal and the VCO to be zero, the phase of the VCO also increases at the rate approximately equal to that in the input signal, all it takes is only the phase error in the response characteristics matters.

FIG. 1is a block diagram showing a control system in which the dead time compensation is applied to the PLL model in the form close to the original Smith method in which such omission described above is taken.

The PLL model10has a phase detector11, an adder (subtracter)12, a loop filter13, and a Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO)14in a main path. Also, this PLL model10has an integrator15, a delay block16, and an adder (subtracter)17in a local path.

It is a part of the phase detector11to provide a bridge between the virtual phase signal and the real phase error signal managed by the PLL.

Since the dead time is tend to occur in the phase detector11, in the model shown inFIG. 1, the dead time is concentrated on the phase detector11. Actually, the dead time decentrally occurs in various places in the loop.

In addition, according to the original of the Smith method, the dead time is concentrated on the VCO portion rather than the phase detector11. However, it is obvious to be able to result in such a form through an equivalent transformation (the technique of the equivalent transformation is widely known by those skilled in the art).

The adder12disposed in the subsequent stage of the phase detector11is a path for compensating for the dead time. A description thereof will be given later.

The loop filter13is disposed in a subsequent stage of the adder12, and thus is a control module for the response characteristics of the loop of the PLL. Also, the VCO14is controlled in accordance with an output signal from the loop filter13.

The VCO14is a module in which an output phase is changed in accordance with an input voltage, and thus can be conceptually interpreted as a function of outputting a signal having a designated phase by a control input as a frequency. Thus, the VCO14is expressed as the perfect integrator in the block diagram because the input and output thereof are coupled in relationship thereof through an integral arithmetic operation. The output signal from the VCO14is fed back to the phase detector11, thereby closing the control loop.

It is noted that the signals from the output signal from the phase detector11to the input signal to the VCO14are signals which really exist in the actual PLL as well.

Although the VCO14sometimes becomes a Current Controlled Oscillator (ICO) or otherwise becomes a Numerically Controlled Oscillator (NCO) which is directly controlled in accordance with a digital signal, the distinction between them needs not to be cared in this discussion.

While the above is the ordinary block configuration of the PLL circuit, a local feedback between the loop filter13and the VCO14is a dead time compensation system based on the Smith method.

In the dead time compensation system, the integrator15corresponding to a replica is firstly disposed. KiKv as an integral gain is made to match the loop gain of the main PLL rather than is made to correspond exactly to the gain of the VCO14of the main body. In principle, all it takes is that the gain of the local feedback, and the circuit loop gain of the main system are the same with each other. Therefore, a change where a gain stage is placed in the local loop is so flexible as to the convenience of the implementation.

Another difference between the replica VCO and the main VCO is described as follows.

That is to say, in the actual PLL, the main VCO14is an oscillator which oscillates at a free-run frequency. However, the replica of the VCO is not realized as an oscillator, but is realized either as a pure integrator as shown in the block diagram, or as an accumulate adder (accumulator) in the case of a discrete system.

Simulating the free-run frequency in the replica VCO is completely useless.

In a delay stage placed after the replica VCO, a delay amount is made to correspond to a circuit delay amount of the main PLL loop. Also, a difference between the portion in the preceding stage of the delay stage, and the portion in the subsequent stage of the delay stage is fed back to the main loop as shown inFIG. 1, thereby making it possible to compensate for the dead time. This is the idea of the Smith method. The input/output characteristics of this system are calculated as expressed by Expression (1):

Here, a dead time factor, exp(−sL), is not included in a denominator. Since the property represented by the denominator is the same as that in the PLL not containing therein the dead time, the same discussion as that in the ordinary PLL can be carried out with respect to the response and the stability. However, since a relationship between a linear range of the phase detector, and a PLL pull-in range ought to be influenced by the dead time, there is no way that the completely same discussion has to be made. Since this relationship is not theoretically understood so well, this relationship is confirmed by carrying out the simulation or the like in a phase of the design. This dead time compensation system successfully functions by simulations.

However, when this dead time compensation system is applied to the actual control PLL circuit, in the case where there is a frequency error between the input frequency and the free-run frequency of the VCO, there is caused such a problem that a phase difference does not converge into zero.

This stems from that the frequency error remains as a constant value of the input of the VCO. This constant value is integrated by the replica VCO to turn into a ramp signal and to turn into a difference between the portion in the preceding stage of the delay stage, and the portion in the subsequent stage of the delay stage, thereby creating an offset proportional to a product of a ramp slope of the ramp signal, and a delay amount in an output from a difference circuit. Since there is an integral term in the loop filter13, an input to the loop filter13need to converge into zero. Therefore, the stabilization is obtained in a state in which the phase offset enough to match the output signal from the difference circuit is output from the phase detector.

In addition, since the ramp signal as the output signal from the replica VCO has a property of endlessly increasing, even when any kind of signal expression is used, it may be impossible to avoid the overflow in principle. Speaking by changing a point of view, in the PLL in which the dead time is taken into consideration, the phase itself needs to be explicitly managed.

Summarizing the foregoing, when the Smith method is applied to the PLL circuit, it is necessary to solve the following two problems:

(1) The phase offset generated by the dead time compensation

(2) The overflow of the ramp signal generated in the output signal from the replica VCO

The present embodiment has been made in order to solve the problems described above, and it is therefore desirable to provide a PLL circuit in which dead time within a loop is compensated for, and thus desired characteristics can be obtained.

In order to attain the desire described above, according to an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a PLL circuit including: a main path through which an input signal is propagated, and an actual signal is output; a main feedback path through which the actual signal is fed back to an input stage of the main path; and a local feedback path through which feedback is carried out from a path middle of the main path to a path middle of an input stage side. The main path includes: a phase detector disposed in the input stage for detecting phases of the input signal and the actual signal; a loop filter disposed on an output side of the phase detector; and a controlled oscillator for oscillating at a frequency corresponding to an output signal from the loop filter to generate an oscillation signal, thereby outputting the oscillation signal as the actual signal to the main feedback path. The local feedback path includes: a replica portion to which an output signal from the loop filter is input, and which functions as a replica of the controlled oscillator; a delay portion for delaying an output signal from the replica portion by circuit dead time; a first subtracter for obtaining a difference between an input signal to the delay portion, and an output signal from the delay portion; and a second subtracter for subtracting a signal obtained by multiplying an internal signal within the loop filter by a constant value from an output signal from the first subtracter thereby outputting a resulting signal to the input side of the loop filter.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a PLL circuit including: a main path through which an input signal is propagated, and an actual signal is output; a main feedback path through which the actual signal is fed back to an input stage of the main path; and a local feedback path through which feedback is carried out from a path middle of the main path to a path middle of an input stage side. The main path includes: a phase detector disposed on the input stage for detecting phases of the input signal and the actual signal; an adder disposed on an output side of the phase detector for adding an output signal from the phase detector, and a feedback signal propagated through the local feedback path to each other; a first subtracter disposed on an output side of the adder for subtracting a signal before delay is carried out in the local feedback path by circuit dead time from an output signal from the adder; a loop filter disposed on an output side of the first subtracter; and a controlled oscillator for oscillating at a frequency corresponding to an output signal from the loop filter to generate an oscillation signal, thereby outputting the oscillation signal as the actual signal to the main feedback path. The local feedback path includes: a replica portion which functions as a replica of the controlled oscillator, and which outputs a part of an output signal thereof to the first subtracter of the main path; a delay portion for delaying an output signal from the replica portion by circuit dead time, and outputting a resulting output signal to the adder of the main path; and a second subtracter for outputting a signal obtained by subtracting a signal corresponding to an output signal from the adder from an output signal from the loop filter of the main path to the replica portion.

As set forth hereinabove, according to the present embodiment, it is possible to provide the PLL circuit in which the dead time within the loop is compensated for, and thus desired characteristics can be obtained.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

It is noted that the description will be given below in accordance with the following order.

1. First Embodiment of PLL circuit

2. Second Embodiment of PLL circuit

1. First Embodiment of PLL Circuit

FIG. 2is a block diagram, partly in circuit, showing a configuration of a PLL circuit according to a first embodiment of the present invention.

The PLL circuit100according to the first embodiment of the present invention has such a configuration that a system for compensating for a ramp output signal from a replica portion (replica VCO) generated based on a difference between an input frequency and a VCO free-run frequency is added in order to dissolve the shortcoming of the Smith method.

Although the various kinds of compensating methods are possible, methods of carrying out the compensation without degrading the original response characteristics of the Smith method are few.

One of the compensating methods is such that a stationary difference between a portion in a preceding stage of a delay circuit and a portion in a subsequent stage of the delay circuit is estimated, and nullify the difference. The first embodiment is shown as a preferred embodiment based on this idea inFIG. 2.

Since the PLL circuit having this configuration is partially identical to the Kalman Predictor, it is referred to as “a Kalman type PLL circuit.”

The PLL circuit100of the first embodiment is configured so as to include a signal processing system for compensating for dead time.

The PLL (Phase Locked Loop) circuit100includes a main path110, a main feedback path120, and a local feedback path130, and is configured in the form of a negative feedback type signal processing system having the dead time within the loop.

A feedback loop LFDB1is composed of the main path110and the main feedback path120.

In the main path110, a phase detector111, an adder (subtracter)112, a loop filter113, and a VCO114as a controlled oscillator are disposed in this order from an input side of an input signal r.

Also, an output signal (actual signal) y from the VCO114is fed back to an adder (subtracter)1111provided in the phase detector111through the main feedback path120.

The phase detector111detects a phase of the input signal r, and a phase of the actual signal y.

The loop filter113has a function of controlling the response characteristics of the loop, and thus includes a portion1131for obtaining an integral term (βΣ), a portion1132for obtaining a proportional term (α+βL), and an adder1133for adding the integral term and the proportional term to each other, thereby outputting a resulting addition signal.

It, is noted that βL in the proportional term presents a correction term.

The VCO114oscillates at a frequency corresponding to the output signal from the loop filter113to generate an oscillation signal, and outputs the oscillation signal as an actual signal to each of a signal processing system (not shown) in a subsequent stage, and the main feedback path120.

The local feedback path130includes a replica integrator (replica portion)131, a delay circuit132, and a subtracter (first subtracter)133. In this case, the replica integrator131corresponds to a replica of the VCO114. The delay circuit132delays an output signal from the replica integrator131by circuit dead time. Also, the subtracter133obtains a difference between an output signal from the replica integrator131, and an output signal from the delay circuit132.

The local feedback path130includes an amplitude adjusting portion134for feeding a signal having an adjusted amplitude back to an input terminal of the loop filter113through the adder112in the preceding stage of the loop filter113.

The local feedback path130further includes a constant multiplication circuit135, and a subtracter (second subtracter)136. In this case, the constant multiplication circuit135multiplies the integral term (βΣ) in the portion1131of the loop filter113by a constant value L. Also, the subtracter136subtracts the output signal from the constant multiplication circuit135from the output signal from the subtracter133.

An input terminal of the local integrator131is connected to an output terminal of the loop filter113, specifically, an output terminal of the adder1133. An output signal from the local integrator131is supplied to the delay circuit132.

The subtracter133subtracts the output signal from the delay circuit132from the output signal from the local integrator131.

In addition, in the first embodiment, as will be described in detail later, the PLL circuit100is configured in such a way that the replica integrator131and the subtracter133are implemented in the digital domain, and are made an accumulator and a subtracter each using two's complement as an expression of a numerical number thereof, respectively, thereby carrying out the dead time compensation.

Hereinafter, the Kalman type PLL circuit having the configuration described above will be considered.

When the state in which the PLL circuit100is equilibrium is considered, the input signal to the VCO114has a constant value proportional to a difference between the input frequency and the VCO free-run frequency.

This level agrees with a level of the output signal from the portion1131for obtaining the integral term (βΣ) within the loop filter113. The replica integrator131of the VCO integrates the same signal as the input signal to the VCO114, and thus a value obtained by multiplying a slew rate of the integrated signal by dead time, L, becomes a phase offset.

Then, when the output signal from the portion1131for obtaining the integral term (βΣ) in the loop filter113is subtracted from the dead time difference in the subtracter136in terms of a correction path, the phase offset can be canceled.

It is noted that even when the output signal itself from the VCO114is used, the same principles ought to be used in terms of an operation. However, the actual characteristics in this case have a tendency to be slightly inferior to the case of the correction path.

The signal processing portion is digital, thereby coping with the problem about the overflow in the replica integrator131of the VCO114.

This digital implementation is reflected in the configuration of the block diagram shown inFIG. 2, and thus the portions from the output terminal of the phase detector111to the input terminal of the VCO114are digital.

Along with this digital implementation, inFIG. 2, the dead time, L, is expressed in the form of L steps of delays instead of being expressed in the form of the time, and the replica integrator131is expressed in the form of the accumulator Σ.

In addition, in the first embodiment, the internal signal of the PLL circuit100is expressed in the form of a two's complement.

The expression of the two's complement has such a property that even when the overflow occurs, the result of the arithmetic substraction is proper unless the difference exceeds a half of the expression range.

By utilizing the property, the proper difference is obtained as long as the signal expression has a sufficient width.

This property will now be described by giving a simple example.

Let us consider the case where a data width is 4 bits, and the data of an addition circuit of the replica integrator131of the VCO114becomes large by 3LSB (Least Significant Bit) while the data passes through the delay circuit132.

When the output signal from the replica integrator131of the VCO114is taken to be “a,” the output signal, b, from the delay circuit132expressed by b=a−3.

When “a” overflows from binary value (0111=7 in decimal), “a” makes wraparound to {1000 (=−8 in decimal)}.

A subtracter of (a−b) is a mechanism for carrying out full addition by obtaining two's complement.

All the cases are calculated as expressed by TABLE 3.

Table 1 shows that desired result can be obtained regardless of existence or nonexistence of overflows.

The PLL circuit100of the first embodiment positively adopts this property of the expression of the two's complement, thereby dissolving the overflow problem.

A minimum amount of necessary bit width can be said as a width within which double of a product of the expression (VCO input conversion) of a frequency error which needs to be followed in terms of the PLL, and the dead time, L, can be expressed.

Since this width changes depending on the setting of the VCO gain, it is preferable that the actual design has several extra bits for safer side.

It is noted that although the VCO114is expressed by a continuous system symbol inFIG. 2, the VCO114may be expressed by a discrete system from a request made from the implementation, and may also be embodied by a virtual module such as Interpolated Timing Recovery (ITR).

It is taken for granted that in any of these changes, there is no essential change required in the present invention.

Next, a transfer function of the Kalman type PLL circuit100shown inFIG. 2will be calculated.

The following substitutions are carried out as expressed by Expression (2):

where T is a clock period.

As a result, Expression (3) is obtained as a transfer function of an equivalent continuous time system:

It is understood from Expression (3) that the dead time disappears in the denominator similarly to the case of the PLL circuit based on the original Smith method.

The reason that inFIG. 2, the proportional term in the portion1132of the loop filter113is taken to be {α+βL} is because a first-order term coefficient in the denominator is made to correspond to α instead of {α+βL}.

In other words, in order to obtain the same damping factor ζ in the Kalman type PLL circuit with the ordinary PLL, the proportional term in the portion1132of the loop filter113needs to become large by βL.

2. Second Embodiment of PLL Circuit

FIG. 3is a block diagram, partly in circuit, showing a configuration of a PLL circuit according to a second embodiment of the present invention.

A method of subtracting a residual phase error from the input signal to the VCO replica is the idea, which is different from that for the Kalman type PLL circuit100of the first embodiment.

Although the configuration based on this method is partially similar to that found in the Non-Patent Document 1 (the paper by M. R. Matausek and A. D. Micic) introduced previously herein, their method cannot be used in the PLL circuit because their correction is carried out for the main path.

A PLL circuit200of the second embodiment has a characteristic configuration such that a correction system is inserted into the input on the replica.

The PLL circuit200of the second embodiment is referred to as an M3 type PLL circuit because the exact spelling of their names is difficult, using the accent symbols. So the PLL circuit200is simply named from initials of Modified Matausek-Micic.

FIG. 3shows a preferred configuration of the M3 PLL circuit.

In this case, a continuous time transfer function is used.

The reason for this is because although it is supposed that the M3 PLL circuit200is also expressed in the form of the discrete time system in the digital implementation, unlike the Kalman type PLL circuit100, it is unnecessary to utilize the characteristics of the fixed point representation.

The PLL (Phase Locked Loop) circuit200includes a main path210, a main feedback path220, and a local feedback path230, and is configured in the form of a negative feedback type signal processing system having dead time within the loop.

In the main path210, a phase detector211, an adder (subtracter)212, a subtracter (first subtracter)213, a loop filter214, and a VCO215are disposed in this order from an input side of an input signal r.

Also, an output signal y from the VCO215is fed back to an adder (subtracter)2111provided in the phase detector211through the main feedback path220.

The phase detector211detects a phase of the input signal r, and a phase of the actual signal y.

The loop filter214has a role of determining the response characteristics of the loop.

The VCO215oscillates at a frequency corresponding to the output signal from the loop filter214to generate an oscillation signal, and outputs the oscillation signal as an actual signal to each of a signal processing system in a subsequent stage not shown, and the main feedback path220.

The local feedback path230includes a replica integrator231and a delay circuit232. In this case, the replica integrator231corresponds to a replica of the VCO215. Also, the delay circuit232delays the output signal from the replica integrator231by circuit dead time.

The local feedback path230has a constant multiplication circuit233which is connected to the output side of the loop filter214in a cascade style, and which multiplies the output signal from the adder212by a constant value.

The local feedback path230has a subtracter (second subtracter)234for subtracting the output signal from the constant multiplication circuit233from the output signal from the loop filter214, and inputting a resulting subtraction signal to the replica integrator231.

One of points of difference of the M3 type PLL circuit200of the second embodiment from the Kalman type PLL circuit100of the first embodiment is that difference circuits before and after the input terminal of the delay circuit232for the dead time are implemented in the form of the adder212and the subtracter213in the main path210in a divided manner.

That is to say, in the M3 type PLL circuit200, the adder212and the subtracter213are disposed in series with each other in a preceding stage of the input terminal of the loop filter214. The delay signal from the delay circuit232is input to the adder212, and the signal before being input to the delay circuit232is input to the subtracter213.

Also, in the M3 type PLL circuit200, a signal which is obtained by subtracting the output signal, from the adder212, multiplied by the constant value from the output signal from the loop filter214in the subtracter234disposed in a preceding stage of the input terminal of the replica integrator231is input to the replica integrator231.

As described above, in the M3 type PLL circuit200, the difference circuits before and after the delay circuit232for the dead time are implemented in the main path210in the division manner.

The output signal from the adder212in a first stage is a sum of a real phase error from the phase detector211, and a phase error produced by the replica integrator231.

The sum is multiplied by a suitable coefficient, and is subtracted from the input signal to the replica integrator231in the subtracter213.

Since the settling is not obtained unless the level of the input signal to the replica integrator231becomes zero, the settling is obtained at a time point when a certain ratio is obtained between the output signal from the loop filter214, that is, the frequency error, and the output signal from the adder212for the phase.

The settling is not obtained unless the input signal to the loop filter214also becomes zero. However, at this time, since the output signal from the replica integrator231has a constant value, that is, the signals before and after the delay circuit232have the same value, the settling is obtained at a time point when the level of the output signal from the phase detector211also becomes zero, that is, the phase error becomes zero.

As described above, in the M3 type PLL circuit200of the second embodiment, the residual phase error compensation is provided for the local feedback loop.

On the other hand, the phase compensation made by the Kalman type PLL circuit100of the first embodiment can be said as the feed forward compensation.

In addition, since in the M3 type PLL circuit200of the second embodiment, no internal state of the loop filter is used, the form of the loop filter is more freely chosen.

Since the output signal from the replica of the VCO215converges into a finite amount, it is possible to naturally cope with the analog implementation.

A transfer function of the M3 type PLL circuit200is expressed by Expression (4):

In this case, the dead time term remains in a denominator. For this reason, Kf cannot be made large so much.

Thus, although the response speed of the M3 type PLL circuit200is inferior to that of the Kalman type PLL circuit100in principle, it is confirmed from the detailed simulation using the actual signal that a performance difference between the M3 type PLL circuit200and the Kalman type PLL circuit100is merely slight.

As has been described so far, according to the first and second embodiments of the present invention, the following effects can be obtained.

That is to say, according to the first and second embodiments of the present invention, it is possible to fundamentally compensate the intra-loop dead time which often results in the unstable factor in the digital PLL circuit.

As a result, the large ωn or ζ which cannot be used in the related art can be used, and thus the high speed pull-in becomes possible. In addition, it is possible to stabilize the PLL circuit.

According to the simulation, the effect of increasing the frequency pull-in range of the PLL is also found out.

FIG. 4is a graph showing an example of a calculation of phase error response characteristics when no dead time compensation is carried out, and an example of a calculation of phase error response characteristics when the Kalman type compensation is carried out.

InFIG. 4, an axis of abscissa represents time, and an axis of ordinate represents a phase error. In addition, inFIG. 4, a curve indicated by a solid line represents the phase error response characteristics when the Kalman type compensation is carried out, and a curve indicated by a broken line represents the phase error response characteristics when no Kalman type compensation is carried out.

In this case, with a period of T=0.1, 20T is supposed as the dead time. Also, KiKv is set as 0.1, and β is set as 0.01. Also, a is set as 1.0 when no dead time compensation is carried out, and a is set as 1.2 when the dead time compensation is carried out so that the damping factors become identical to each other between both when no dead time compensation is carried out and when the Kalman type compensation is carried out.

Since the simulation which will be shown below uses a linear model, the pull-in range of the phase detector111is not modeled.

For this reason, although a set value for the phase error is not important because a scale of the axis of ordinate has merely to be changed, 2π rad/s is given as the slew rate of the input signal, and 0.1 rad/s is given as the phase error.

When parameters with which excellent response characteristics are respectively obtained are searched for by adjusting α and β, the characteristics as shown inFIG. 5are obtained.

In the case of the Kalmam type PLL circuit100, α=2.5 and β=0.05. Also, in the case of the simulation in which no dead time compensation is carried out, α=0.4 and β=0.005.

From the above, the effect of the dead time compensation is obvious. On the other hand, it should be noted that the target values of α and β with which the suitable response is obtained are quite different from each other. Also, the target values of β are different between when no dead time compensation is carried out and when the Kalman type compensation is carried out by one digit.

FIG. 6is a graph showing response characteristics of the Kalman type PLL circuit100, and the M3 type PLL circuit200.

InFIG. 6, a curve indicated by a solid line represents the response characteristics of the Kalman type PLL circuit100, and a curve indicated by a broken line represents the response characteristics when the M3 type PLL circuit200.

The response of the Kalman type PLL circuit100is identical to that shown inFIG. 5.

In the M3 type PLL circuit200, a is set as 2.0, and a damping constant is made equal to that in the Kalman type PLL circuit100.

The value of β in the Kalman type PLL circuit100and the M3 type PLL circuit200are each set as 0.05, and the value of Kf/(KvKi) of the M3 type PLL circuit200is set as 0.2. Although the response of the M3 type PLL circuit200is slightly slow than that of the Kalman type PLL circuit100as indicated by the theory, this difference is not so large.

The present application contains subject matter related to that disclosed in Japanese Priority Patent Application JP 2009-157256 filed in the Japan Patent Office on Jul. 1, 2009, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.