Structure for probe insertion

An insert structure is proposed for insertion into an orifice, a canal, a tube and the like of a human or animal creature such as an ear canal, an intestinal tract, a gullet, etc. The insert structure comprises at least one longitudinally extending insert member (3) and a plurality of at least nearly perpendicularly extending further members (5, 7, 9), placed longitudinally at a distance to each other along the insert member, the further members (5, 7, 9) being at least of a flexible and/or soft material.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention refers to an insert structure for insertion into an orifice, a canal, a tube, etc. of a human or animal body such as an ear canal, an intestinal tract, a gullet, etc. and a method of introducing a sensor, a scanning device, a video head and the like into an orifice, a canal, a tube, etc. of a human or an animal creature.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

For a proper fit e.g. of a hearing device it has always been considered vital to obtain good data of the ear canal. In case of hearing instruments for hard of hearing patients the data needs to cover a significant part of the canal and preferably beyond the “second bend”. Traditionally, data has been obtained with a silicon ear impression and this process is well-established. Being a manual and quite difficult process, alternative technologies have been searched for a long time and currently the focus is on direct scanning of the ear. An intermediate stage is scanning of ear impressions for computer-based in-the-ear (ITE) shell or behind-the-ear (BTE) mold production.

The pursuit of direct ear scanning is still ongoing and there are several approaches being studied. A number of problems remain to be solved, one being the way to insert the scanning head (probe) into the ear canal without hurting the patient, changing the shape of the canal or impacting the data acquisition. This is one of the subjects of the present invention.

In this respect in WO 02/091920 A1 the insertion of a scanning probe into an ear canal is proposed. Therefore, this prior art document is highly relevant and interesting, but does not give any contribution to the above mentioned problem.

In WO 02/16867 A1 a 360° probe-shaped non-contact scanning device is described. It also includes the post-processing of the data to obtain high-precision 3D data for individual ear canal shapes. But again nothing in this prior art document is addressing the issue relating to bends within the ear canal and insertion depth control.

In WO 02/16865 A2 a calibration method for ear scanning probes in order to achieve needed precision is described. The invention itself again does not touch the topic of the present invention.

There are several still open issues and real problems pursuing replacement of traditional ear impression taking by “direct ear scanning” one way or another. Most approaches involve the use of light (LED, laser, etc.); some propose video, ultrasound, computer tomography and even MRI (magnetic resonance imaging). Challenges relate to issues like: resolution, physical reference points, ear canal skin surface condition, post-processing of 3D information and touchless insertion/extraction of probes. The latter problem has not really been solved by any significant patent documents or publications to date and remains an obstacle in obtaining good 3D data of the undistorted ear canal. In addition, there are problems like skin scratches during insertion and extraction and even more severe: harm to the tympanic membrane, which is both very unpleasant and bears the risk of a distorted tympanic membrane function (e.g. conductive hearing loss).

Besides the described problem in relation particularly to insertion into the ear canal, this of course is a general problem in relation to the insertion of any kind of scanning probes, sensors, video heads, tubes like cannulas or catheters etc. into orifices, canals, tubes and the like of the human or animal body. Besides the ear canal this could be e.g. the intestinal tract, the gullet, etc.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore a subject of the present invention to propose a solution for introducing in an easy and reliable manner a device such as a scanning device, a sensor, a cannula or catheter, a testing probe, a video head, etc. into an orifice, a canal, a tube, etc. of a human or animal body without causing skin scratching, injuring, harming, etc. of tissues, cartilage or bone skin etc.

According to the present invention an insert structure is proposed. The inventive insert structure for insertion into an orifice, a canal, a tube, etc. of the human or animal body or creature respectively such as an ear canal, an intestinal tract, a gullet of a human or animal being comprises at least one longitudinally extending insert member and a plurality of at least nearly perpendicularly extending further members placed longitudinally at a distance in between the further members along the insert member, the further members being at least of a flexible and/or soft material.

According to a further design the insert member is a tube- or rod-like flexible member.

Again according to a further design it is proposed that the insert member being a tube-like member open at both ends, such that the tube acts like a guidance or supporting structure for the introduction of a sensor, a viewing probe, a scanning probe, a video head, a cannula or catheter, etc. being inserted into the canal or tube of the human or animal being through the tube-like member.

If e.g. optical scanning, viewing or video scanning is planned, it is preferred that the tube-like insert member is transparent, so that viewing, scanning etc. through the tube wall is possible.

Furthermore, according to a further design it is proposed that the at least nearly perpendicularly extending further members are arranged with equal spacing between each other.

Further preferred designs are described in the dependent claims.

Furthermore, a method for introducing a sensor, a scanning probe, a video scanning device, a cannula or catheter, etc. into an orifice, a canal, a tube, etc. of a human or animal body is proposed according to the wording of claim10. The sensor, the scanning device, etc. can be introduced by using an insert structure as proposed above having a tube-like insert member being open at least on one end. The e.g. pin-like sensor or scanning device can be introduced into the orifice of the tube-like insert member and can be moved within the ear canal or tube of the human or animal body either by moving the insert structure into the canal or tube of the body and/or by moving the sensor within the tube-like insert member.

Again, further preferred methods are described within the dependent claims.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1shows schematically and in lengthwise perspective view an inventive insert structure1mainly comprising a central tube- or rod-like insert member3, which preferably has to be very flexible. Along the insert member3various at least nearly perpendicularly extending further members or disk-like members5are arranged, whereby the distance between the various disk-like further members5preferably is approx. equal.

It is preferred that at least some of the perpendicularly extending further members or disk-like members are specially marked, like e.g. a first bend marker7and a second bend marker9. Using marked disk-like members it is possible to know at any time the depth of the insertion of the insert member into e.g. an ear canal. Standard markers will give a good indication of the depth of the introduction into the ear canal.

InFIG. 2the insertion structure1ofFIG. 1is shown in a longitudinal section view in more detail. Again, the central insert member3is shown, which is preferably a tube with open ends on both sides. Therefore, e.g. an optical sensor probe, such as an optical fiber, is introduced through the tube-like insert member until the tip of the fiber slightly extends beyond the front end of the insert member by a very short distance21. In case of an ear canal, this distance may be e.g. approx. 2 mm. Such a tip on an optical scanning probe is shown and designated with the reference no.11inFIG. 2. In addition again the disk-like members5,7and9are shown. The disks are arranged, each at a distance23from the next disk-like member, whereby the distance23in case e.g. of an ear canal may be approx. 5 mm.

At the back end of the insert member3e.g. an electric wire, an optical fiber, etc.15can be introduced and be connected through the tube-like insert member3with the tip11of the optical scanning probe or optical fiber, respectively, extending at the front end of the tube-like insert member.

As already explained in relation toFIG. 1it is very important always to know the depth of the introduction of the insertion structure into e.g. the ear canal, so that there is no danger of injuring the tympanic membrane or tympanum respectively. Therefore, again inFIG. 2e.g. the disk-like members7and9are especially marked.

In order to ensure that an inserted scanning probe11does not extend beyond the front end of the insert member3by more than a certain predetermined distance21, a marker13can be arranged on the electric wire, optical fiber, etc.15. This prevents the scanning probe11from being inserted too far into e.g. the ear canal, and therefore safeguards the tympanic membrane or tympanum respectively from being injured. The marker13can also be a mechanical stopper which is securely attached to the electric wire, optical fiber, etc.15.

InFIG. 3it shall now be shown in more detail and based on an example how the insertion structure shall be introduced into e.g. an ear canal.

FIG. 3shows schematically and in a longitudinal section view an ear canal31extending from the ear opening30to the tympanic membrane33which separates the ear canal31from the middle-ear35.

Looking atFIG. 3it becomes very obvious that the contours of the ear canal wall are quite complex and furthermore it has to be understood that these contours differ very substantially from one ear canal to another. In other words, an ear canal structure is very individual and the structures may differ quite dramatically from one human or animal being to another.

Therefore, when introducing any kind of a sensor, a scanning device and the like it is very difficult to introduce such a device without injuring or harming the internal skin of the ear canal. Furthermore, it is important that the introduction of such a device is stopped before it reaches the tympanic membrane33. Both problems, which mean injuring the skin of the ear canal as well as safely inserting the scanning probe through the tube-like insert member3, are solved by using the inventive insert structure since e.g. the scanning head can never come into contact with the skin of the ear canal. Furthermore, by using marked disk-like members7and9and/or by using marks on the tube-like insert member one always knows the depth of the insertion of the insert structure. Furthermore, due to the marker13arranged on the electric wire, optical fiber, etc.15one always knows when the scanning probe which is inserted through the insert tube has reached the front end of the tube-like insert member and one can stop the further insertion of the device.

A further advantage of the inventive structure is that the tube-like member is more or less within the center axis of the ear canal and any kind of scanning of the ear canal structure can be executed in the more or less optimal position of the optical scanning probe, the video camera, the sensor, etc.

But of course, the invention is not at all limited to the introduction of scanning probes or sensors as described above, but it is also possible to introduce cannulas or catheters into at least a first section of the intestinal tract or into the gullet, etc. Also the introduction of cannulas or catheters may cause harm to the skin, e.g. of the intestinal tract, of the gullet and the like.

The flexibility either of the insert member as well as of the disk-like members may be of great importance. Preferably, both members are made out of a flexible material such as e.g. an elastomeric polymer, rubber, silicon rubber, at least partially foamed material, etc. Of course any kind of suitable e.g. polymeric material may be used, the important point is that the material has a high compatibility to skin, is acid resistant and resistant against water. And of course the material should not be toxic even at a very low level.

Furthermore, instead of using the disc-like members, it is also possible to use star-like members or parts comprising perpendicularly extending fingers also made out of an elastomeric polymer, the elastic fingers sliding along the interior wall of the ear canal during the introduction of the insert structure. In that sense it is possible to use any kind spacing members to guide the insert member into the canal or tube, such as e.g. the ear canal.

In summary, the idea of the present invention is to propose a structure that will address and solve the following problems:Insertion and extraction of e.g. an ear scanner probe without touching the ear canal independent of the canal shape,insertion depth control. There are indicators on the insertion support structure indicating e.g. by color coding insertion depth. E.g. ear canal depth is on average about 28 mm from the first bend with a standard deviation of about 2.6 mm. From the second bend in the canal the average is about 17 mm with a similar standard deviation. Hence there will be no risk to affect the tympanic membrane if the probe extends e.g. 2 mm from the front end of the supporting structure. In addition the probe itself could contain viewing properties such as in case e.g. of a video head, an optical scanner, etc.

Furthermore, an optional solution could be to make the supporting structure transparent to allow recording while pulling the probe out through the tube.

A further solution could be to apply a flexible and possibly disposable membrane or envelope10over the whole supporting or insert structure3, as shown inFIG. 4. This membrane10would be slightly pressed towards e.g. the ear canal by the disk-like members such as e.g. the silicon rings on the central insert tube. The probe would then record the membrane shape, which may be provided with a specific pattern and which is prepared to allow optimal e.g. optical scanning. The offset or the difference to the real canal wall data can be corrected by geometric (e.g. thickness of the membrane) and statistical data.