Dual polarized based station antenna

An improved antenna system for transmitting and receiving electromagnetic signals comprising a mounting plate having a length and a longitudinal axis along the length. A plurality of staggered dipole radiating elements project outwardly from a surface of the mounting plate. Each of the radiating elements includes a balanced orthogonal pair of dipoles aligned at first and second predetermined angles with respect to the longitudinal axis, forming crossed dipole pairs. The mounting plate is attached to a longitudinally extending chassis. An unbalanced feed network is connected to the radiating elements. The feed network extends along the mounting plate and is spaced from the mounting plate by a plurality of clips. The feed network is disposed between the chassis and the mounting plate. A plurality of microstrip hooks are provided, each of the microstrip hooks being positioned adjacent to, and spaced from, each of the dipoles by one of the clips.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
The present invention relates generally to the field of antennas. More 
particularly, it concerns a dual polarized base station antenna for 
wireless telecommunication systems. 
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
Base stations used in wireless telecommunication systems have the 
capability to receive linear polarized electromagnetic signals. These 
signals are then processed by a receiver at the base station and fed into 
a telephone network. In practice, the same antenna which receives the 
signals can also be used to transmit signals. Typically, the transmitted 
signals are at different frequencies than the received signals. 
A wireless telecommunication system suffers from the problem of multi-path 
fading. Diversity reception is often used to overcome the problem of 
severe multipath fading. A diversity technique requires at least two 
signal paths that carry the same information but have uncorrelated 
multi-path fadings. Several types of diversity reception are used at base 
stations in the telecommunications industry including space diversity, 
direction diversity, polarization diversity, frequency diversity and time 
diversity. A space diversity system receives signals from different points 
in space requiring two antennas separated by a significant distance. 
Polarization diversity uses orthogonal polarization to provide 
uncorrelated paths. 
As is well-known in the art, the sense or direction of linear polarization 
of an antenna is measured from a fixed axis and can vary, depending upon 
system requirements. In particular, the sense of polarization can range 
from vertical polarization (0 degrees) to horizontal polarization (90 
degrees). Currently, the most prevalent types of linear polarization used 
in systems are those which use vertical/horizontal and 
+45.degree./-45.degree. polarization (slant 45.degree.). However, other 
angles of polarization can be used. If an antenna receives or transmits 
signals of two polarizations normally orthogonal, they are also known as 
dual polarized antennas. 
An array of slant 45.degree. polarized radiating elements is constructed 
using a linear or planar array of crossed dipoles located above a ground 
plane. A crossed dipole is a pair of dipoles whose centers are co-located 
and whose axes are orthogonal. The axes of the dipoles are arranged such 
that they are parallel with the polarization sense required. In other 
words, the axis of each of the dipoles is positioned at some angle with 
respect to the vertical or longitudinal axis of the antenna array. 
One problem associated with a crossed dipole configuration is the 
interaction of the electromagnetic field of each crossed dipole with the 
fields of the other crossed dipoles and the surrounding structures which 
support, house and feed the crossed dipoles. As is well known in the art, 
the radiated electromagnetic (EM) fields surrounding the dipoles transfer 
energy to each other. This mutual coupling influences the correlation of 
the two orthogonally polarized signals. The opposite of coupling is 
isolation, i.e., coupling of -30 dB is equivalent to 30 dB isolation. 
Dual polarized antennas have to meet a certain port-to-port isolation 
specification. The typical port-to-port isolation specification is 30 dB 
or more. The present invention increases the port-to-port isolation of a 
dual polarized antenna. This isolation results from the phase-adjusted 
re-radiated energy that cancels with the dipole mutual coupling energy. 
Generally, dual polarized antennas must meet the 30 dB isolation 
specification in order to be marketable. Not meeting the specification 
means the system integrator might have to use higher performance filters 
which cost more and decrease antenna gain. The present invention overcomes 
these concerns because it meets or exceeds the 30 dB isolation 
specification. Additionally, dual polarized antennas generally must 
achieve 10 dB cross polarization discrimination at 60 degrees in order to 
be marketable, i.e., must achieve 10 dB cross polarization discrimination 
at a position perpendicularly displaced from the central axis of the 
antenna and 60 degrees away from the plane intersecting that axis. The 
present invention provides a means to meet the 10 dB cross polarization 
discrimination specification. 
Another problem associated with prior antenna arrays is their size. Prior 
antenna arrays provided a plurality of radiating elements along the length 
of the antenna. Therefore, the length of the antenna was dictated by the 
number and spacing of the radiating elements. Because the gain of an 
antenna is proportional to the number and spacing of the radiating 
elements, the width and height of prior antennas could not be reduced 
significantly without sacrificing antenna gain. 
In order to prevent corrosion, there is a need for an antenna capable of 
preventing water and other environmental elements from impinging upon 
active antenna components. One solution is providing the antenna with a 
protective radome. However, one problem with prior antennas is the 
attachment of the protective radome to the antenna. Because of the manner 
of attachment of prior radomes, prior radome designs allow water and other 
environmental elements to impinge upon active antenna components, thereby 
contributing to antenna corrosion (e.g., the failure of sealants such as 
caulk). Furthermore, because those prior radomes do not maintain seal 
integrity over both time and thermal excursions, such radomes allow water 
and other environmental contaminants to enter the antenna. 
Moreover, the visual impact of base station towers on communities has 
become a societal concern. It has become desirable to reduce the size of 
these towers and thereby lessen the visual impact of the towers on the 
community. The size of the towers can be reduced by using base station 
towers with fewer antennas. This can be achieved if dual polarized 
antennas and polarization diversity are used. Such systems replace systems 
using space diversity which requires pairs of vertically polarized 
antennas. Some studies indicate that, for urban environments, polarization 
diversity provides signal quality equivalent to space diversity. With the 
majority of base station sites located in urban environments, it is likely 
that dual polarized antennas will be used in place of the conventional 
pairs of vertically polarized antennas. Another way to reduce the size of 
the base station towers is by using smaller base station antennas. The 
present invention addresses the problems associated with prior antennas. 
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
An improved antenna system is provided for transmitting and receiving 
electromagnetic signals comprising a mounting plate having a length and a 
longitudinal axis along the length. A plurality of staggered dipole 
radiating elements project outwardly from a surface of the mounting plate. 
Each of the radiating elements includes a balanced orthogonal pair of 
dipoles aligned at first and second predetermined angles with respect to 
the longitudinal axis, forming crossed dipole pairs. The mounting plate is 
attached to a longitudinally extending chassis. An unbalanced feed network 
is connected to the radiating elements. The feed network extends along the 
mounting plate and is spaced from the mounting plate by a plurality of 
clips. The feed network is disposed between the chassis and the mounting 
plate. A plurality of microstrip hooks are provided, each of the 
microstrip hooks being positioned adjacent to, and spaced from, each of 
the dipoles by one of the clips. 
The present invention therefore provides an antenna array which produces 
dual polarized signals. The invention also provides an antenna capable of 
at least 30 dB port-to-port isolation. The invention further provides an 
antenna capable of at least 10 dB cross polarization discrimination at 60 
degrees. The invention also provides an antenna capable of high gain while 
reducing the width and height of the antenna by staggering the dual 
polarized radiating elements contained therein. The inventive antenna 
incorporates an axially-compliant labyrinth seal that is both integral to 
the radome and maintains seal integrity over both time and thermal 
excursions. The antenna is capable of matching an unbalanced transmission 
line connected to the feed network with the balanced dipole elements. The 
antenna is relatively inexpensive to produce because substantially all the 
parts in the antenna can be mass produced at a low per unit cost; the 
number of unique parts and total parts is relatively small; adhesive, 
soldering and welding is eliminated; and the number of mechanical 
fasteners is minimized.

DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS 
The present invention is useful in wireless communication systems. One 
embodiment of the present invention operates in a range of frequencies 
between 800-1,000 MHz (this includes the ESMR, GSM and cellular bands of 
frequencies). Generally, wireless telephone users transmit an EM signal to 
a base station tower that includes a plurality of antennas which receive 
the signal transmitted by the wireless telephone users. Although useful in 
wireless base stations, the present invention can also be used in all 
types of telecommunications systems. 
The antenna illustrated in FIGS. 1-5 is a 55-70 degree azimuthal, half 
power beam width (HPBW) antenna, i.e., the antenna achieves a 3 dB 
beamwidth of between 55 and 70 degrees. FIG. 1 shows an antenna array 10 
of crossed, dual polarized dipole radiating elements 11a-n that are 
connected to a mounting plate 12. The mounting plate 12 is a metal ground 
plane and, as shown in FIG. 7, has a first side 14 and a second side 16. A 
longitudinally extending chassis 52 houses the mounting plate 12 and the 
radiating elements 11a-n. A longitudinally extending molding 70 attaches 
to the chassis 52 and supports the mounting plate 12. The number of 
radiating elements, the amount of power presented to the feed network and 
the composition and dimensions of the radiating elements and the mounting 
plate all contribute to the radiation pattern generated by the antenna. 
Preferably, the radiating elements 11a-n and the mounting plate 12 are 
composed of a metal such as aluminum. However, other metals such as copper 
or brass can be used to construct the radiating elements 11a-n and the 
mounting plate 12. 
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the gain of the 
antenna is proportional to the number of staggered radiating elements 
present in the array and the spacing of the elements. In other words, 
increasing the number of radiating elements in the antenna 10 increases 
the gain while decreasing the number of radiating elements reduces the 
antenna's gain. Therefore, although 14 radiating elements are illustrated, 
the number of radiating elements can be increased to increase the gain. 
Conversely, the number of radiating elements can be decreased to reduce 
the gain. The gain of the antenna 10 is maximized due to the use of dipole 
radiating elements 11a-n which are efficient radiators and by using an 
efficient microstrip feed network 31. 
The radiating elements 11a-n transmit and receive EM signals and are 
comprised of pairs of dipoles 18a and 18b, 20a and 20b, 22a and 22b, 24a 
and 24b, 26a and 26b, 28a and 28b, 30a and 30b, 32a and 32b, 34a and 34b, 
36a and 36b, 38a and 38b, 40a and 40b, 42a and 42b, and 44a and 44b, 
respectively. The radiating elements 11a-n form angles of +45 degrees and 
-45 degrees with respect to the longitudinal axis 13a or 13b, 
respectively. Each of the radiating elements 11a-n receives signals having 
polarizations of +45 degrees and -45 degrees. That is, the axes of the 
dipoles are arranged such that they are parallel with the polarization 
sense required. In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 1, the slant angles 
+.alpha. and -.alpha. are +45 degrees and -45 degrees, respectively. 
Although shown with slant angles of +45 degrees and 45 degrees, it will be 
understood by those skilled in the art that these angles can be varied to 
optimize the performance of the antenna. Furthermore, the angles +.alpha. 
and -.alpha. need not be identical in magnitude. For example, +.alpha. and 
-.alpha. can be +30 degrees and -60 degrees, respectively. In the 
illustrated embodiment of FIG. 1, one dipole in each of the radiating 
elements 11a-n receives signals having polarizations of +45 degrees while 
the other dipole in each of the radiating elements 11a-n receives signals 
having polarizations of -45 degrees. 
As illustrated in FIG. 5, the feed network 31 comprises two branches 31a 
and 31b. Branch 31a is electromagnetically coupled to each of the parallel 
dipoles 18a, 20a, 22a, 24a, 26a, . . . , and 44a by a microstrip hook 
adjacent to each of the respective dipoles. Branch 31b is 
electromagnetically coupled to each of the parallel dipoles 18b, 20b, 22b, 
24b, 26b, . . . , and 44b by a microstrip hook adjacent to each of the 
respective dipoles. The received signals from parallel dipoles 18a, 20a, 
22a, 24a, 26a, . . . , and 44a are distributed to a receiver using branch 
31a for that polarization. Likewise, the received signals from parallel 
dipoles 18b, 20b, 22b, 24b, 26b, . . . , and 44b are distributed to a 
receiver using branch 31b for the other polarization. As illustrated in 
FIGS. 7-8, the feed network 31 extends along the mounting plate 12 and is 
spaced below the second side 16 of the mounting plate 12 by a plurality of 
clips 50. The feed network 31 is located between the mounting plate 12 and 
the chassis 52 in order to isolate the feed network 31 from the radiating 
elements 11a-n and to substantially reduce the amount of EM radiation from 
the feed network 31 that escapes from the antenna 10. The feed network 31 
distributes the received signals from the radiating elements 11a-n to a 
diversity receiver for further processing. Each of the radiating elements 
11a-n can also act as a transmitting antenna. 
Each dipole is comprised of a metal such as aluminum. Each dipole includes 
two half dipoles. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 5, the dipole 42b 
includes half dipoles 42b' and 42b". Each of the half dipoles has a 
generally inverted L-shaped profile, as illustrated in FIG. 5. The four 
half dipoles that comprise one radiating element are all physically part 
of the same piece of metal, as illustrated in FIG. 6, and are all at earth 
ground at DC. However, each of the two dipoles that comprise a radiating 
element operate independently at RF. As shown in FIG. 5, each half dipole 
is attached to the other three half dipoles at the base 46 of each 
radiating element. The base 46 includes four feet 48 that allow the 
radiating element to be attached to the mounting plate 12 (shown in FIG. 5 
and 6). The radiating elements are attached to the mounting plate 12 by a 
cold forming process developed by Tox Pressotechnik GmbH of Weingarten, 
Germany (the cold forming process). The cold forming process deforms the 
four metal feet 48 and the metal mounting plate 12 together at a button. 
The cold forming process uses pressure to lock the metal of the feet 48 
and the metal of the mounting plate 12 together. This process eliminates 
the need for mechanical fasteners to secure the radiating elements to the 
mounting plate 12. 
The present invention also improves the cross polarization discrimination 
of antenna 10. As illustrated in FIG. 5, a downwardly extending vertical 
portion 57 is provided at the distal end of each generally L-shaped 
dipole. The vertical portion 57 improves the cross polarization 
discrimination of the antenna such that at least 10 dB cross polarization 
discrimination is achieved at 60 degrees. 
A portion of each generally L-shaped half dipole forms a vertical support. 
For example, as illustrated in FIG. 5, half dipole 42b' includes vertical 
support 54 and half dipole 42b" includes vertical support 55. A microstrip 
hook is attached to, and spaced from, each of the dipoles by one of the 
clips 50. The microstrip hooks electromagnetically couple each dipole to 
the feed network 31. For example, adjacent dipole 42b is microstrip hook 
56 which is integral with branch 31b of the feed network 31. A 
balanced/unbalanced (balun) transformer 58 is provided for each of the 
dipoles 18a, 18b, 20a, 20b, 22a, 22b, 24a, 24b, 26a, 26b, . . . , 44a and 
44b. The general operation of a balun is well known in the art and is 
described in an article by Brian Edward & Daniel Rees, A Broadband Printed 
Dipole with Integrated Balun, MICROWAVE JOURNAL, May 1987, at 339-344, 
which is incorporated herein by reference. Each of the baluns 58 comprise 
one microstrip hook and the vertical support for each half dipole. For 
example, as illustrated in FIG. 5, the dipole 42b includes the balun 58 
which comprises the microstrip hook 56 and the vertical supports 54 and 
55. Each of the microstrip hooks 56 is generally shaped like an inverted 
U. However, in order to achieve a symmetrical pair of crossed dipoles, one 
leg of the inverted U is substantially longer than the other leg. The 
baluns 58 match the unbalanced transmission lines connected to the feed 
network 31 with the balanced pairs of dipole elements 18a and 18b, 20a and 
20b, 22a and 22b, 24a and 24b, 26a and 26b, . . . , and 44a and 44b, 
respectively. The microstrip hooks 56 are each integrally connected to the 
feed network 31. The plurality of microstrip hooks 56 are each attached 
to, and spaced from, each of their respective dipoles by one of the clips 
50. The clips 50 are composed of a dielectric material such as, for 
example, a glass fiber loaded polypropylene. As illustrated in FIGS. 9-12, 
each of the clips 50 include two generally U-shaped upper projections 49 
extending upwardly from a base 51 and two generally U-shaped lower 
projections 53 extending downwardly from the base 51. The lower 
projections 53 allow the clips 50 to attach to, for example, one of the 
dipoles or the mounting plate. The upper projections 49 allow the clips 50 
to attach, for example, the feed network 31 to the mounting plate 12 or 
one of the microstrip hooks 56 to one of the dipoles. 
FIG. 7 illustrates a radome 60 that encloses the antenna array 10. The 
radome 60 includes two longitudinally extending bottom edges 62 that are 
integrally formed with the radome 60. The chassis 52 includes two 
longitudinally extending rails 63. The radome 60 is secured to the antenna 
10 by, for example, sliding the radome 60 onto the chassis 52 such that 
the longitudinally extending bottom edges 62 are in spring engagement with 
the rails 63 of the chassis 52. Alternatively, the radome 60 is secured to 
the antenna 10 by snapping the bottom edges 62 into the rails 63 of the 
chassis. The tight, frictional engagement between the bottom edges 62 and 
the rails 63 inhibits water and other environmental elements from entering 
the antenna, to prevent corrosion of the antenna 10. The guide rails 
secure the radome 60 to the antenna 10 and prevent movement of the radome 
60 with respect to the chassis 52 in two directions, i.e., laterally and 
vertically away from the mounting plate 12. End caps 73 snap onto the ends 
of the antenna 10 to seal in the radiating elements 11a-n and to protect 
the antenna 10 from adverse environmental conditions. Extending through 
the chassis 52 approximately halfway down the length of the antenna 10 are 
a pair of connectors 64 that electrically connect branch 31a and branch 
31b of the feed network 31 with, for example, an external receiver or 
transmitter. Alternatively, the connectors 64 may be located in one of the 
end caps of the antenna 10. A pair of integrated mounting bracket 
interfaces 65 extend along the exterior of the chassis 52 and allow the 
antenna 10 to be connected to a base station tower. 
In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 1, the 14 crossed dipole radiating 
elements 11a-n are attached to a mounting plate 2.6 m long by 0.25 m wide. 
The antenna 10 operates in a range of frequencies between 800-1,000 MHz 
(this includes the ESMR, GSM and cellular bands of frequencies). The 
longitudinal axes 13a and 13b extend along the longitudinal length of the 
array 10. Seven of the radiating elements (11a, 11c, 11e, 11g, 11i, 11k, 
and 11m) are aligned along the longitudinal axis 13a while the other seven 
radiating elements (11b, 11d, 11f, 11h, 11j, 11l, and 11n) are aligned 
along the longitudinal axis 13b. Thus, the radiating elements are aligned 
in a first longitudinally extending row 66 and a second longitudinally 
extending row 68 on the mounting plate 12. Each radiating element in the 
first row 66 is staggered from each of the radiating elements in the 
second row 68. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the radiating elements in row 66 
and the radiating elements in row 68 are each longitudinally separated 
from each other by a distance D. However, the radiating elements in the 
first row 66 are longitudinally separated from the radiating elements in 
the second row 68 by a distance equal to approximately D/2. 
The antenna of the present invention includes dual polarized radiating 
elements that produce two orthogonally polarized signals. The present 
invention further provides an antenna array comprised of crossed dipoles. 
The invention comprises a plurality of staggered radiating elements that 
provide the antenna with high gain while reducing the width and height of 
the antenna. The elements of the inventive antenna improve the isolation 
between the EM fields produced by the crossed dipoles. The downwardly 
extending vertical portion at the distal end of each generally L-shaped 
dipole improves the cross polarization discrimination of the antenna such 
that at least 10 dB cross polarization discrimination is achieved at 60 
degrees. The antenna also minimizes the number of antennas required in a 
wireless telecommunication system, thereby providing an aesthetically 
pleasing base station that is of minimum size. The inventive antenna 
incorporates an axially-compliant labyrinth seal that is both integral to 
the radome and maintains seal integrity over both time and thermal 
excursions. The antenna is less expensive to produce because substantially 
all the parts in the antenna can be mass produced at a low per unit cost; 
the number of unique parts and total parts is relatively small; adhesive, 
soldering and welding is eliminated; and the number of mechanical 
fasteners is minimized. 
While the present invention has been described with reference to one or 
more preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that 
many changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and 
scope of the present invention which is set forth in the following claims.