An OTDM coherent transceiver and related methods and apparatus that employ a pulsed source which advantageously allows higher symbol rates without requiring higher speed electronics.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates generally to the field of optical communications and in particular to an optical time division multiplexed (OTDM) coherent transceiver.

BACKGROUND

Contemporary optical communications and related systems require an increasingly greater symbol rate to meet ever increasing capacity demands for such communications. Attempts at increasing the symbol rate of such systems however, are oftentimes accompanied by a corresponding increase in the speed of associated electronics. Consequently, methods, structures and systems that enhance the symbol rate of optical communications systems while not requiring a corresponding increase in electronic performance, would represent a welcome addition to the art.

SUMMARY

An advance in the art is made according to an aspect of the present disclosure directed to methods, structures and systems for OTDM optical communications and in particular an OTDM optical transceiver.

Operationally, and according to an aspect of the present disclosure, the OTDM optical transceiver integrates both a receiver and a transmitter on a single chip and employs a pulsed optical input signal. More particularly, in response to the receipt of the pulsed optical signal—the transceiver generates a number of delayed optical pulses which are subsequently used by both the receiver and the transmitter.

Advantageously, a transceiver according to the present disclosure does not require temperature stabilized PICs, generates a high baud rate signal that is tolerant to nonlinearities and laser line width, it allows for a very high spectral efficiency, and it does not require long finite-impulse response filters in the DAC(s).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the disclosure, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently-known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in the future, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure.

Thus, for example, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the diagrams herein represent conceptual views of illustrative structures embodying the principles of the invention.

In addition, it will be appreciated by those skilled in art that any flow charts, flow diagrams, state transition diagrams, pseudocode, and the like represent various processes which may be substantially represented in computer readable medium and so executed by a computer or processor, whether or not such computer or processor is explicitly shown.

Thus, for example, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the diagrams herein represent conceptual views of illustrative structures embodying the principles of the disclosure.

By way of some additional background, it is noted that—in the prior art—in order to increase the data rate exhibited by a coherent transceiver, one could increase the speed of the electronics (i.e., analog-to-digital converters (ADCs), digital-to-analog converters (DACs)), to increase the baud rate, increase the number of points in constellations used, or increase the number of carriers used (i.e., wavelength-division-multiplexing (WDM) or orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM)). However, as is known by those skilled in the art, the speed of the electronics is limited by the technology(ies) employed and the number of constellation points is limited by the required sensitivity.

More particularly, a multicarrier transceiver exhibits a poor spectral efficiency unless one uses long finite-impulse response filters in the DAC to generate steep “side walls”, and the nonlinear tolerance is limited by the nonlinear tolerance of each carrier—unless joint processing is performed, which significantly adds to the complexity. Furthermore, temperature-stabilized filters are usually required with Wavelength Division Multiplexing/Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (WDM/OFDM) approaches.

R. Nagarajan et. al., in an article entitled “10 Channel, 100 Gbit/s per Channel, Dual Polarization Coherent QPSK, Monolithic InP Receiver Photonic Integrated Circuit”, which was presented at Optical Fiber Communication Conference in 2011 and published at p.OML7, described a multicarrier InP coherent receiver. As described, the receiver includes 10 integrated lasers, which those skilled in the art will readily appreciate are difficult to make with high yield on a single chip and as all of the lasers must be wavelength stabilized. Additionally, it employed separate chips for transmit and receive—requiring additional packaging than a single chip. Additionally, it exhibited poor spectral efficiency as the lasers are limited by their wavelength stability to a relatively wide wavelength separation. Finally, its channels are narrow-band and therefore susceptible to nonlinearities.

In sharp contrast, and according to an aspect of the present disclosure, a single chip transmitter/receiver (transceiver) is described which provides a higher baud rate signal through the effect of optical time-division multiplexing (OTDM). A schematic of such a device is shown schematically inFIG. 1.

With reference to thatFIG. 1, there is shown a single chip, Silicon Photonics, Photonic Integrated Circuit (SiPh PIC) including both receiver and transmitter integrated onto the single chip. As shown, optical output from a pulsed source (i.e., laser) is applied to a polarization maintaining—Er-doped fiber amplifier (PM-EDFA), the output of which is applied to the transmitter input—a 1×N splitter (where N=3 in the FIGURE). At this point those skilled in the art will appreciate that while a 1×3 splitter is shown in this exemplary embodiment, the specific configuration and/or number of splits may vary depending upon the type of transceiver constructed.

The output of the 1×3 splitter is directed into three (N) unequal length waveguides which in turn are optically connected to three, 1×4 splitters. As implemented the unequal length waveguides are constructed such that they each exhibit an increasing delay differential with respect to one another, wherein the delay differential is substantially equal to a symbol period/N.

The outputs of the three 1×4 splitters are further directed to a series of six (2N) Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK) modulators and 90 degree hybrids. As shown schematically inFIG. 1, two of the outputs of each of the 1×4 splitters are directed to two of the QPSK modulators while the remaining two of the outputs of each of the 1×4 splitters are directed to two of the 90 degree hybrids. For example, the outputs of the first 1×4 splitter are directed to the first and fourth QPSK modulator and the first and fourth 90 degree hybrids. Similarly, the four outputs of the second 1×4 splitter are directed to the second and fifth QPSK modulators and the second and fifth 90 degree hybrids. Finally, the four outputs of the third 1×4 splitter is directed to the third and sixth QPSK modulator and the third and 6th90 degree hybrids.

Each of the QPSK modulators are driven by a number (4N) of serializers/deserializers (SERDES) or digital to analog converters (DACs) and the outputs of the modulators are combined through the effect of a power combiner, filtered, and finally combined through the effect of a polarization splitter and rotator (PBSR) and output as TxOut. As shown inFIG. 1, three of the QPSK modulator (modulators 1-3) outputs are combined by a single power combiner and the other three QPSK modulator (modulators 4-6) outputs are combined by a second power combiner, the filtered outputs of which are combined by the PBSR prior to output.

As may be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the effect of applying a pulsed input to the first 1×3 splitter and then delaying the output(s) of that splitter through the effect of the unequal length waveguides as the effect of “producing” a series of pulses applied to the 1×4 splitters delayed by an amount equal to the symbol period/N. Consequently, an effective series of pulses is produced from each single pulse received from the pulse source.

With continued reference toFIG. 1and in particular with respect to the receiver portion of the transceiver, it may be observed that a received signal Rx in is applied to a polarization splitter and rotator (PBSR) which splits the received signal and applies the split signals to two, 1×3 splitters which in turn direct their outputs to the series of six 90 degree hybrids. The 90 degree hybrids, which as noted previously each receive pulses output from the three 1×4 splitters comprising the transmitter—are output to a respective photodetector the outputs of which are further directed to a series of 4N ADCs. As may be appreciated at this point by those skilled in the art, the pulsed inputs to the 90 degree hybrids (from the transmitter 1×4 splitters) serve as pulsed local oscillators for the 90 degree hybrids.

It may be readily understood that Si photonics chips are preferred for these embodiments as they produce high yields and exhibit high index contrast. Operationally, the first pulsed source—which may reside on a separate chip—generates the optical pulses as input. The pulses are shorter or equal to the desired symbol period T. The pulses are amplified and applied to a second PIC (the transceiver) where they are split into N copies—where TN is the symbol period. The N copies are selectively time delayed by a different integer number T—through the effect of the unequal length waveguides—and then split further. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the order of the time delaying and splitting may be interchanged or varied such that particular one(s) of the signals are time delayed before splitting and particular one(s) split after.

Portions of the time delayed, split signals are applied to an array of 2N, I-Q modulators exhibiting a symbol period of TN. The signals are then combined for each target polarization, and one of the two target polarizations is rotated to an orthogonal polarization and then polarization combined through the effect of the PBSR. Consequently, an OTDM transmit signal is produced from lower speed tributaries.

Notably, the PBSR may be—for example—a 2D grating coupler. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that such a 2D grating coupler advantageously provides both polarization splitting and rotation in one compact device. Show further inFIG. 1, are the tunable optical filters—one for each polarization—positioned in the transmitter immediately before the PBRS. Such filters advantageously narrow the spectrum of the OTDM signal, converting it from RZ to NRZ thereby increasing the spectral efficiency. Importantly, the ultimate OTDM signal may be made indistinguishable from a signal created directly by higher speed DACs. Consequently, the high-baud rate signal may take advantage of the nonlinear tolerance improvement found as baud rate is increased.

With respect to the receiver portion of the PIC, time-delayed split portions output from the 1×4 splitters that are not directed to the modulators are directed to the 90 degree hybrids of the receiver where they serve substantially as pulsed local oscillators. Accordingly, signals received at receiver input (Rx in) are polarization split and rotated through the effect of a PBSR and subsequently split to 2N 90 degree hybrids. As noted previously, the time-delayed split (pulsed local oscillator) signals provide other input to the hybrids. The hybrid outputs are directed to photodetectors and finally to a digital signal processor. Operationally, the pulsed local oscillator demultiplexes the OTDM received signal into low-speed tributaries. The DSP therefore must perform joint processing on the tributaries to compensate the chromatic and polarization mode dispersion. Advantageously, this may be pipelined in the DSP and should not require any extra power consumption as compared to N times the power consumption of processing a single tributary.

As may be further understood, the pulse timing must be synchronized between both transceivers at each end of a link. Accordingly, for a given transceiver pair, one operates as a master and the other as a slave. The master has a free-running clock for the pulses, and the slave synchronizes its pulses to the master's clock. Alternatively, one could have both transceivers of a transceiver pair “slave” off of each other using a fast control loop while both slave to a reference clock using a slow control loop.

FIGS. 2(a) and 2(b)show in schematic form pulse generating chips that may advantageously operate with the transceiver PIC according to the present disclosure. More particularly,FIG. 2(a)shows a CW laser that is externally modulated comprising a gain chip, the output of which is input to an ext. cavity which in turn is applied to a pulse carver. Similarly,FIG. 2(b)shows a mode-locked laser suitable for applying pulsed input to a transceiver according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 3shows an exemplary mode-locked laser design having a modulated Bragg grating for use with the transceiver PIC of the present disclosure. More specifically, the mode locked laser includes two high-order (of sampled) Bragg reflectors with slightly different periods. One of the Bragg reflectors includes a modulaton that is electrically driven at a desired pulse rate. Also included are DC phase shifters that ensure that reflected signals from the two gratings are in phase and that the transmitted signals are also in phase. In addition, there is an optional saturable absorber in the gain chip to shorten the pulses. The saturable absorber may advantageously be a section of gain medium that is reverse biased.

Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that while the methods, techniques and structures according to the present disclosure have been described with respect to particular implementations and/or embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosure is not so limited. Accordingly, the scope of the disclosure should only be limited by the claims appended hereto.