Power measurement apparatus and method therefor

A self-balancing impedance bridge circuit apparatus includes a sensor device and an electrical element providing a selectable impedance value such that the impedance of the sensor device corresponds to the temperature of the sensor device remaining within acceptable limits.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to an apparatus for measuring RF power of the type, for example, comprising a self-balancing impedance bridge, one branch of which comprises a sensor element, the impedance of which can be altered. The present invention also relates to a method of measuring RF power for the above apparatus.

BACKGROUND ART

An output power level of a system is frequently a critical factor in the design and performance of almost all radio frequency and microwave equipment incorporating the system. For the measurement of certain power levels, power meters employing thermocouple sensors are considered preferable to power meters employing thermistor sensors since, in addition to possessing an inherent square-law detection characteristic, the thermocouple sensors exhibit a higher sensitivity and has a higher dynamic range of powers measured than the thermistor sensors.

However, one criticism of power measurements taken using thermocouple power meters is that the power meters that use thermocouples do not exercise direct power substitution. Consequently, a given measurement circuit can produce different DC output voltages as a result of sensitivity differences between different sensors being used with the given measurement circuit. Alternatively, or additionally, the different output voltages can be attributed to drift in the sensitivity of a given sensor unit due to aging of the thermocouple sensor of the given sensor unit or temperature effects. Since power meter systems using thermocouple sensors do not possess a feedback path to enable correction for differences in sensor sensitivities, aging of the thermocouple sensors, or temperature effects, power measurements taken with thermocouple sensors are said to be uncorrected and are, hence, considered less accurate than power measurements taken using thermistor power meters. In contrast, power meters using thermistor sensors employ a so-called DC-substitution process.

In order to overcome the above shortcomings of power meters that use thermocouple sensors, it is known to equip the power meters with a power reference oscillator, typically operating at a frequency of 50 MHz and an output power of 1 mW. If a user of the power meter needs to verify the accuracy of the power meter, thermocouple sensor and cable coupled in-between (hereinafter referred to as the “power measurement system”), or adjust the power meter for a sensor of a different sensitivity, the user can connect the thermocouple sensor to an output of the power reference oscillator of the power meter and, using a calibration adjustment, set the power meter to read a known value of a reference power generated by the power reference oscillator, for example 1.00 mW, or a value derived from the known value of the reference power. The overall accuracy of the power measurement system is dependent upon the accuracy of the power reference oscillator.

The reference oscillator is therefore clearly an important part of power measurement systems, especially those using thermocouple or diode sensors, if accuracy of power measurements is to be maintained. One important parameter of the reference oscillator which needs to be maintained is an output impedance of the reference oscillator in order to ensure that the impedances of the meter/cable/sensor combination and the reference oscillator are matched so that a correct amount of RF power is transferred from the reference oscillator to the power measurement system.

In the context of testing the output impedance of the reference oscillator, it therefore follows that the transfer of RF power from a source (the reference oscillator) to a test load (a test power meter/cable/sensor combination) is dependent upon the impedance of the load and the effective impedance of the source. The RF power, PA, transferred can be expressed in terms of Voltage Reflection Coefficients (VRCs):PA=PZ0×1-Γ221-ΓS⁢ΓL2(1)
where:PZ0is the power that the source can deliver to a load equal to Z0Ω; andΓsand ΓLare the respective, complex number, VRCs of the source and the load.

However, in most cases, only magnitudes of the source VRC and the load VRC are known, and so only upper and lower limits can be placed on the transferred power level, PA. Consequently, an uncertainty as to the exact amount of power transferred from the reference oscillator to the test power meter exists. Mathematically, the uncertainty, U, can be expressed approximately as follows:
U=±200|ΓSΓL|%  (2)

As an example, for a known reference oscillator of an Agilent Technologies, Inc. E4418B power meter generating an output signal having a frequency of 50 MHz at a power level of 1 mW, an overall uncertainty attributable to a measurement of the power level of the output signal is of the order of ±0.5% to 0.7%. Approximately, 0.1% to 0.3% of the overall uncertainty can be attributed to the mismatch uncertainty associated with the transfer of the power of the reference oscillator output signal to the test power meter. The mismatch uncertainty can therefore make a significant contribution to the overall uncertainty attributable to the measurement of the power level of the output signal mentioned above. Given the purpose served by reference oscillators, and more generally power reference sources, the mismatch uncertainty therefore needs to be maintained at a very low value. There is therefore clearly a need to calculate the mismatch uncertainty associated with the amount of power transferred from the reference oscillator to the test power meter, and so values for the load and source VRCs, ΓL, ΓS, need to be measured or calculated.

Whilst the VRC of the load (the test meter system) can be measured with relative ease using conventional methods, the VRC of the source (the reference oscillator) can only be established when the reference oscillator is active. As a result of the need for the reference source to be active, known measurement techniques, such as Vector Network Analysis (VNA), can not be used, because VNA relies upon a principle of applying a sinusoidal signal to the reference oscillator and measuring relative amplitude and phase of a reflected signal; the reflected signal will be distorted by the signal generated by the reference oscillator. It will therefore be impossible to measure accurately the proportion of the VNA signal that has been reflected, as the VNA signal and the signal generated by the reference oscillator are at a same frequency.

Another known technique is a so-called impedance bridge for measuring the output impedance of the reference oscillator. However, the signal generated by the reference oscillator will also interact with the impedance bridge in such a way as to render any measurement of the impedance of the reference oscillator inaccurate.

In order to obviate the above disadvantage of the impedance bridge measurement technique, another known measurement technique disclosed in the Agilent E4416A/E4417A Service Guide (Agilent Technologies Limited, E4416-90014) provides a way of measuring the source match using a modified impedance bridge. In particular, the technique employs an Agilent Technologies Inc 432A power meter having a self-adjusting impedance bridge, one branch of the impedance bridge comprising thermistors, the impedance of which can be altered by altering a switchable resistance, in an adjacent branch, between two settings: 200Ω and 100Ω. The switching of the resistance results in a consequential change in the impedance of the thermistors, and hence the VRC of the test meter system, or load. Consequently, a mechanism is provided to switch the load VRC, ΓL, between two values, allowing the source VRC, ΓS, to be calculated approximately, and verified by measurement using conventional means. Once the source VRC, ΓS, is known, it is possible, using equation (2), to calculate the mismatch uncertainty, U, associated with the transfer of power from the reference oscillator to the 432A test power meter and with the adjustment of the output power of the reference oscillator.

However, some thermistors employed in sensor units have a negative temperature coefficient with respect to resistance. As a result, the temperature of the thermistor(s) rise(s) when the resistance of the thermistor(s) fall(s). This temperature rise can make the sensor unit less reliable, or can even damage the thermistor(s) and hence the sensor unit.

DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION

According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a self-balancing impedance bridge circuit apparatus for measuring RF power, the apparatus comprising: a bridge circuit comprising a first branch connected to a second branch thereof; wherein the first branch comprises a sensor device having an impedance value and a temperature coefficient associated therewith, a temperature of the sensor device being related to the impedance value; the second branch comprises at least one electrical element capable of providing a selectable impedance value, the selectable impedance value biasing, when in use, the impedance value of the sensor device; and the selectable impedance value is such that the impedance value of the sensor device corresponds to the temperature of the sensor device not exceeding a predetermined temperature.

The temperature coefficient may be a negative temperature coefficient.

The sensor device may be a bolometric device, and in one possible embodiment the bolometric device may be a thermistor.

The at least one electrical element capable of providing the selectable impedance value may be switchable and/or the at least one electrical element capable of providing the selectable impedance value may be a network of impedances.

The network of impedances may comprise a first impedance, a second impedance, and a switch for connecting the first impedance or the second impedance in-circuit with respect to the bridge circuit.

The apparatus may further comprise another sensor device coupled to the sensor device. The sensor device may behave as series coupled to the another sensor device with respect to the bridge circuit, and the sensor device may behave as parallel coupled to the another sensor device, when an RF signal is applied at a node between the sensor device and the another sensor device.

The bridge circuit may further comprise: a third branch that may be coupled to a fourth branch, the third and fourth branches including a substantially same impedance; and the third branch may be coupled to the second branch and the fourth branch may be coupled to the first branch.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a power meter and sensor unit comprising the apparatus as set forth above in accordance with the first aspect of the present invention.

According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of measuring RF power for a self-adjusting impedance bridge, the method comprising the steps of: setting a selectable impedance value of a first branch of a bridge circuit so as to bias an impedance of a sensor device in a second branch of the bridge circuit coupled to the first branch of the bridge circuit, a temperature of the sensor device relating to the impedance of the sensor device; wherein the sensor device has a temperature coefficient associated therewith; and the selectable impedance value is such that the impedance of the sensor device corresponds to the temperature of the sensor device not exceeding a predetermined temperature.

The method may further comprise the step of: making a first measurement of the power of an RF signal. A second measurement of the power of the RF signal may be made after changing the selectable impedance value.

The temperature coefficient may be a negative temperature coefficient.

The sensor device may be a bolometric device, the bolometric device may be a thermistor.

The step of changing the selectable impedance value may comprise the step of: switching the selectable impedance value between a first impedance value and a second impedance value so as to bias the impedance of the sensor device, and/or the selectable impedance value may be provided by a network of impedances.

The network of impedances may comprise a first impedance, a second impedance, and a switch; and the method may further comprise the step of: switching the first impedance or the second impedance in-circuit with respect to the bridge circuit.

The method may further comprise the step of: providing another sensor device coupled to the sensor device. The sensor device may behave as series coupled to the another sensor device with respect to the bridge circuit, and the sensor device may behave as parallel coupled to the another sensor device when an RF signal is applied at a node between the sensor device and the another sensor device.

It is thus possible to provide a self-balancing impedance bridge circuit apparatus, and a method therefor, that does not increase the temperature of one or more sensor device in a branch of the bridge circuit above a predetermined temperature associated with inaccurate operation of, or even damage to, the one or more sensor device.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring toFIG. 1, a power meter100is coupled to a test power meter system102, the test system102comprising a sensor unit104, a cable106and a test meter unit108. The power meter100comprises a power reference source (not shown), for example a reference source oscillator, coupled to a reference source port110. Under test conditions, the reference source port110is coupled to the sensor unit104in order to achieve coupling of the power meter100to the test system102, the sensor unit104being coupled to the test meter unit108via the cable106. In this example, the test meter unit108is a 432A meter unit supplied by Agilent Technologies, and the sensor unit104is a 478A option H75 or H76 sensor unit supplied by Agilent Technologies. The test meter unit108and the sensor unit104are suitably adapted in order to conform with the structure described hereinbelow.

With regard toFIG. 2, the test system102comprises, in part, a self-adjusting impedance bridge200. The skilled person will appreciate that the test meter unit108can, and does in this example, comprise a second “compensation” self-adjusting bridge (not shown). The self-adjusting impedance bridge200comprises a bridge circuit202having a first thermistor204having a first terminal coupled to an earth205and a second terminal coupled to a first terminal of a second thermistor206and an RF input port208via a first capacitor210; the junction of the first and second thermistors204,206constitute a topological node. A second terminal of the second thermistor206is also coupled to the earth205via a second capacitor212, the second terminal of the second thermistor206also being coupled to a non-inverting terminal214of an operational amplifier216. The first and second thermistors204,206constitute a first branch of the bridge circuit202. In this example, the thermistors are 33A501/5 thermistors manufactured by Victory Engineering Corporation.

The second terminal of the second thermistor206is also coupled to a first terminal of an impedance network218, the first terminal of the impedance network218being coupled to a first terminal of a first resistor220, for example a 200Ω resistor constituting a first selectable impedance value, and a first terminal of a second resistor222, for example a 400Ω resistor constituting a second selectable impedance value.

A second terminal of the first resistor220and a second terminal of the second resistor222are coupled to a first terminal224and a second terminal226, respectively, of a two-way switch228. A third terminal230of the two-way switch228is coupled to an output terminal232of the operational amplifier216and an output terminal234of the self-adjusting impedance bridge200. The first and second resistors220,222and the two-way switch228constitute a second branch of the bridge circuit202. Whilst resistors have been used in this example, other electrical elements capable of providing impedances can be employed in addition to or to replace the first and second resistors220,222.

The third terminal230of the two-way switch218is also coupled to a first terminal of a third resistor236, for example a 1 kΩ resistor, a second terminal of the third resistor236being coupled to an inverting input terminal238of the operational amplifier216. The third resistor236constitutes a third branch of the bridge circuit202.

The second terminal of the third resistor236is also coupled to a first terminal of a fourth resistor240, for example a 1 kΩ resistor, a second terminal of the fourth resistor240being coupled to the first terminal of the first thermistor204and hence the earth205.

In order, ultimately, to determine an uncertainty value, U, of the amount of power transferred from the reference source (the source) to the test system102(the load), a source VRC and a load VRC need to be calculated. As will be appreciated by a person skilled in the art, the load VRC is known approximately, by virtue of the knowledge of the values of the first and second resistances220,222forming the impedance network218, and the values of the third resistor236and fourth resistor240. Alternatively, the load VRC can be measured by a conventional technique, for example, by using a VNA.

Therefore, it is necessary to carry out measurements in order to calculate the source VRC, ΓS. The ability to vary the impedance value switched into the bridge circuit202at the second branch, results in an ability to vary the impedance of the first and second thermistors204,206, thereby causing the load VRC, ΓL, to be varied as well. Hence, two different conditions under which power is delivered to the test power meter108, or load, are provided.

It should be understood that the second compensation self-adjusting bridge (not shown) also comprises a corresponding secondary bridge circuit (not shown). The structure of the secondary bridge circuit is the same as the bridge circuit202.

In order to understand how the above two conditions under which power can be delivered to the test power meter system102can be used to calculate the source VRC, ΓS, and hence the mismatch uncertainty value, U, a mathematical basis for calculation of the source VRC, ΓS, is set out below.

Based upon equation (1) above, if the load VRC can assume two different values, Γ1and Γ2, and the two different values give rise to two different respective power measurements, P1and P2(the available powers remaining the same), the equation (1) can be expressed as:PZ0=P1⁢1-ΓS⁢Γ121-Γ12=P2⁢1-ΓS⁢Γ221-Γ22(3)

Given that P1, P2, Γ1, Γ2can either be calculated or measured, the left side of equation (4) can be replaced by a factor, M, giving:M=1-ΓS⁢Γ21-ΓS⁢Γ1(5)

Whilst equation (5) can not be directly solved for the source VRC, ΓS, because the source VRC, ΓS, is a complex quantity, an approximate solution using the two values of the load VRC, ΓL, is:ΓS=(2⁢Γ1⁢M-2⁢Γ2)±(2⁢Γ2-2⁢Γ1⁢M)2-4⁢(Γ12⁢M-Γ22)⁢(M-1)2⁢(Γ12⁢M-Γ22)(6)

Using equation (6) above, an adequately accurate result for the source VRC, ΓS, can be obtained provided a phase angle θ of the reference source is within one of the ranges −40°≦θ≦40°, 140°≦θ≦180°, or −180°≦θ≦−140°. Consequently, in order to be able to calculate the source VRC, ┌S, the following measurement steps are carried out.

In operation, the sensor unit104is coupled to the reference source port110and the power meter100and the test system102are powered-up (step300). The switch230of the test meter unit108is then set to, or a user verifies that the switch230is already set to, the first impedance value (step302), in this example 200Ω. The reading of the test meter unit108is then recorded (step304) by the user. The switch230is then set by the user to the second impedance value (step306), in this example 400Ω, and the reading of the test meter unit108is again recorded (step308) by the user. A corresponding switch (not shown) of the second compensation bridge circuit (not shown) is actuated at substantially the same time as the switch230is actuated.

The impedance network218and the first and second thermistors204,206are part of the self-adjusting impedance bridge200, and so the effective replacement of the first resistor220with the second resistor222in the second branch of the bridge circuit202by means of actuating the two-way switch230biases an impedance value provided by the first and second thermistor combination204,206. Whilst, at DC, the first and second thermistors204,206behave as series coupled, at RF, the first and second thermistors204,206behave as parallel coupled, and so the impedance value is biased from approximately 50Ω at RF to 100Ω at RF.

Given that the first and second thermistors204,206have, in this example, negative temperature coefficients, the increase in impedance of the first and second thermistors204,206does not result in a consequential rise in temperature of the first and second thermistors204,206, which would have occurred had the second resistor222been rated at a value less than the first resistor220. Consequently, undesirable heating of the first and/or second thermistor204,206, beyond a predetermined temperature corresponding to damage or inaccurate operation of the first and/or second thermistor204,206, is avoided.

Once the source and load VRCs, ΓLand ΓS, are known, the uncertainty value, U, is calculated (step312) from the equation (2).

Whilst the above examples have been described in the context of one or more thermistors, it should be appreciated that other sensor devices, such as other types of bolometric devices, can be employed in place of, or in combination with, the one or more thermistor, where heating of the sensor device above, or even below, a predetermined temperature threshold is to be avoided, depending upon the temperature coefficient(s) of the sensor device(s). Additionally, the skilled person will understand that references, implicit or explicit, herein to DC operation of the self-adjusting impedance bridge (and the second compensation self-adjusting impedance bridge) do not preclude operation of these bridges with higher frequency signals than DC, for example, 10 KHz audio signals. In such cases, references to resistances should be read as references to impedances.