Golf ball with fluorescent cover

An improved colored golf ball is disclosed. The golf ball is made with a fluorescent coloring. In order to improve durability and give very pleasing aesthetics, the fluorescent coloring is blended into the cover stock. The name and/or number preferably are stamped directly onto the core for surprisingly superior durability. The cover stock can suitably be a clear ionomer resin and for highest gloss a clear final coating can be applied. If the name or trademark is stamped directly onto the core, it is visible through the clear cover. A UV stabilizer may be included. If a dye is used, it is preferred that it be 0.01-0.4% by weight of the cover and if a pigment is used the preferred range is 0.5-6% by weight of the cover.

The present invention relates to golf balls and, in particular, golf balls 
having a fluorescent appearance rather than the traditional white 
appearance. 
For approximately the last 40-50 years golf balls have been made by bonding 
a cover about a core. The cover can either be compression molded from two 
half shells or it can be directly injection molded as a fluid about the 
core. Until about the mid 1960's most golf ball covers were made of a 
natural resin, notably balata. Since the mid 60's a synthetic resin sold 
under the trademark "Surlyn" by E. I. Dupont has increasingly assumed a 
greater position as a golf ball cover material and it has, today, the 
major share of the market. Covers made of such materials are described in 
prior U.S. patents. 
Various attempts have been made over the years to make one piece solid golf 
balls. However, no one has succeeded in making a top grade one piece golf 
ball. Top grade golf balls today are made with a cover material as 
mentioned hereinbefore molded about a core, with the core being either a 
wound core or a solid core, both of which are very well known in the art. 
No matter what the construction of the golf ball or the composition of the 
cover, it has been the practice in the art to apply a finish to the 
surface of the golf ball cover. This is an elaborate, expensive and highly 
developed technology. A typical painting operation with a Surlyn covered 
golf ball involves sand blasting the surface of the cover, washing, drying 
and then the successive steps of applying a primer, drying the primer at 
about 100.degree. F., applying a first white coat, drying the first coat 
at about 100.degree. F., applying a second white coat, drying the second 
coat at about 100.degree. F., stamping a trademark and numbers, and then 
following with a clear finish coat and drying it at about 100.degree. F. 
Despite these many steps, even the best of manufacturers have some wearing 
away of the paint surface, especially after extensive use of the ball. 
This is especially true with the Surlyn covered golf balls. 
The problem is paraticularly acute when the cover is a different color from 
the paint system as is the case with both balata and Surlyn covers when 
they are painted white. Most manufacturers attempt to compensate for this 
color difference by including a whitening agent, usually titanium dioxide, 
in the cover composition. This imparts a white appearance to the cover. 
However, this is quite a dull white appearance and the difference between 
the surface color and the cover, even where the cover contains titanium 
oxide, is generally quite noticeable to the golfer as the paint wears 
away. 
While they have generally fallen out of favor today, there was a time when 
red coated golf balls were manufactured and sold, particularly for play by 
"snow birds". One of the reasons that these were not generally accepted, 
even though they could be very well seen as compared to a white golf ball 
when played in snowy or heavy frost conditions, was that the paint would 
come off fairly quickly revealing the white cover. This caused the balls 
to be associated with poor quality, as a result of which sale of them was 
never very great. There have also been attempts from time to time to 
market pastel coated golf balls as "ladies balls". These have, however, 
never achieved great success and this is also believed to be a result of 
the appearance-durability problem. 
At the present time there is a craze sweeping the golf ball world with 
respect to golf balls covered with fluorescent paint. These golf balls 
have been found by many to be substantially more visible than the 
traditional white golf balls. While some have predicted that this craze 
will go the way of aluminum shafts, graphite shafts, floating golf balls, 
steel centers and the like, others predict that fluorescent golf balls 
will become a permanent and large share of the golf ball market. 
One of the circumstances that may prevent these fluorescent colored golf 
balls from becoming a permanent share of the market is the old problem of 
paint wear. As with the snow bird and ladies golf balls, the fluorescent 
covered golf balls are having a substantial problem with paint wear and 
the balls on the market today are showing quite poor 
appearance-durability. Not only do the paints wear away to show the cover 
color, but they also have a substantial tendency to chip off revealing 
large portions of the cover. 
The applicant has now discovered that the appearance-durability problem of 
fluorescent covered golf balls can be overcome by incorporating the 
fluorescent material directly into the cover composition. This is not a 
simple replacement of the titanium dioxide for white golf balls with a 
fluorescent coloring agent for fluorescent golf balls. Quite the contrary, 
the applicant has found that fluorescent material incorporated in the 
cover of the golf ball can be used as the finished cover of the golf ball. 
The final surface of the golf ball may be clear coated as in the past; 
however, no opaque coating is applied as has been done with golf balls, 
including colored golf balls, since the 20's. 
The present invention is especially advantageous where the golf ball cover 
material is clear, e.g. most Surlyn resins. While a wound golf ball can be 
used with a clear cover for "special effects" it is preferred that the 
core be a one-piece solid. It is also preferred that the core be 
essentially white in color. Where a white core is used with a clear cover, 
the stamping can be put directly on the core and can be seen through the 
cover. This is true even where a fluorescent material is used to color the 
golf ball cover material. This is of very great advantage since it ensures 
a long lasting and, indeed, relatively permanent retention of the 
trademark and identification number and any other markings put on the 
ball. This also overcomes one of the more difficult problems of high 
quality golf ball manufacture, poor stamping. It advantageously permits 
the use of a low quality foil for the stamping since the foil is not 
required to have durability characteristics. 
While the golf ball with the fluorescent material therein is a very good 
looking golf ball, the gloss can be made even greater by the application 
of one or more clear, or essentially clear, top coats. The top coat should 
be of sufficient clarity so that the covered material can be seen 
therebeneath. If the top coat is opaque, the primary advantages of the 
present invention cannot be obtained. 
The fluorescent materials useful in the present invention are commercially 
available fluorescent pigments and dyes. They are described in U.S. Pat. 
Nos. 2,809,954, 2,938,873, 2,851,424 or 3,412,036. A good commercial 
source for these products is Dayglo Color Corporation. As described in the 
cited patents, these fluorescent daylight materials are organic 
co-condensates. They are typically composed of melamine, an aldehyde such 
as formaldehyde, a heterocyclic compound and/or an aromatic sulfonamide. 
Typical of such materials is Solvent Yellow 44, compounds containing which 
are sold by DayGlo under the trademark Saturn Yellow and by Lawter under 
the trademark Lemon Yellow. The amount of fluorescent material to be used 
is largely a matter of choice depending on the brightness desired. 
However, it is preferred that the amount of fluorescent dye be from about 
0.01% to about 0.40% by weight of the cover composition and the amount of 
fluorescent pigment be from about 0.5% to about 6% by weight of the cover 
composition. 
Because of the relatively unstable nature of fluorescent pigments and dyes, 
and especially because of the outside use to which golf balls are put, it 
is preferred that a U.V. stabilizer be added to the cover composition. If 
either the fluorescent material or the cover material comes with 
sufficient U.V stabilizer, it is obviously not beneficial to add more. 
However, whether present in the cover materials or added thereto, it is 
preferred that a U.V. stabilizer be present in the amount of from about 
0.1% to about 3.0% by weight of the cover, more preferably from about 0.5% 
to about 2.0%. 
Where it is desired that the trademark and number be put on the surface of 
the golf ball cover rather than on the core, a fluorescent pigment can be 
used rather than a fluorescent dye. This will give a translucent 
fluorescent cover. However, as in the situation where the fluorescent dye 
is used, no opaque finish is applied to the surface of the golf ball; if 
any coating is used, it is an essentially clear coating. 
It is also possible to obtain special effects by adding other coloring 
materials. For example, a white opacifying agent such as titanium dioxide 
or calcium carbonate can be used to make the cover essentially opaque. 
This can be used to hide the threads of a wound golf ball. Again, in this 
case, however, it is preferred that any coating be limited to a clear 
coating. 
These and other advantages of the present invention may be understood from 
the following drawings and examples:

Referring specifically to FIG. 1, there is shown a golf ball 10 having a 
transparent cover 12 over a solid core 16. The cover 12 may contain a 
fluorescent dye so long as the cover is still transparent. Affixed to the 
core 16 is indicia 18, suitably stamped, which is visible through the 
transparent cover 12. 
Turning now to FIG. 2, there is shown a golf ball 10 having a cover 14 
applied to a core 16. The core may be either solid or wound. The cover has 
a fluorescent dye or a fluorescent pigment incorporated therein and may 
also include an opacifying agent. On top of the cover 14 is affixed a 
transparent coating 20. There is no opaque coating between the cover 14 
and the transparent coating 20. 
The following are specific examples according to the present invention. 
EXAMPLE 1 
A solid core was used for the golf ball. The solid core was white in 
appearance and was the core from the commercially available PINNACLE golf 
ball. The cover composition was prepared by admixing 99.96% by weight 
Surlyn and 0.04% by weight Dayglo Fluorescent Dye Saturn Yellow. The cover 
composition was formed into golf ball half shells in the standard manner 
in an injection molding machine. At the same time, the golf ball core was 
stamped with a trademark and a number. Thereafter the golf ball half 
shells were compression molded about the core. The flash line from the 
compression molding was removed by buffing. It was noted that 
substantially less care was required in the buffing operation than that 
usually required with titanium dioxide pigmented golf ball covers. The 
buffed golf ball was then clear coated in the standard manner. 
The resulting golf ball had a very pleasing fluorescent appearance with a 
high degree of gloss. The trademark was clearly visible through the cover. 
In extended hitting tests, the golf ball was found to have substantially 
better appearance-durability than commercially available fluorescent 
colored golf balls. At the end of 200 hits equivalent to 200 yard drives, 
the appearance was almost the same as the initial appearance and the 
trademark was still fully intact and clearly visible. 
EXAMPLE 2 
Example 1 is repeated with the same cover composition on a wound core. In 
this case, however, the trademark is applied to the surface of the golf 
ball cover before the clear coat is applied. A golf ball with the windings 
visible is obtained. 
EXAMPLE 3 
Example 1 is again repeated except that in this case a clear coat is not 
employed. A comparable golf ball but somewhat less gloss is obtained. 
EXAMPLE 4 
Example 1 is repeated except that in the place of the Dayglo Saturn Yellow, 
the Lemon Yellow from the Lawter Chemical Co. of Skokie, Ill. is used. 
Comparable results are obtained. 
EXAMPLE 5 
Example 1 is repeated except that the amount of Dayglo Saturn Yellow is 
increased to 0.40%. A comparable golf ball is obtained but the high level 
of dye makes the ball somewhat less bright and so less visible. 
EXAMPLE 6 
Example 1 is repeated except that the amount of Dayglo Saturn Yellow is 
reduced to 0.01%. A comparable golf ball is obtained except that it does 
not have the fullness of the color of the golf ball of Example 1. 
EXAMPLE 7 
Example 1 is repeated except that a fluorescent pigment is used rather than 
a fluorescent dye and the trademark is applied to the surface of the golf 
ball cover before the clear coat is applied. The fluorescent pigment is 
Dayglo Saturn Yellow A-17-N and is used in the amount of 2.0% by weight. 
The resulting golf ball has a very pleasing fluorescent appearance but 
without the clear cover of the golf ball of Example 1. A translucent cover 
is obtained. 
It will be understood that the claims are intended to cover all changes and 
modifications of the preferred embodiment of the invention herein chosen 
for the purpose of illustration which do not constitute departures from 
the spirit and scope of the invention.