System and method for detecting a possible loss of integrity of a flexible bag for biopharmaceutical product

Integrity of a flexible bag is verified by a testing system, using helium to detect existence of a possible hole. The bag is preliminary placed in vacuum chamber of a fluid-tightly isolated enclosure. After connecting a port of the bag to a helium feeding pipe and after pre-pressurizing the bag with nitrogen, a test is performed in a vacuum suction mode for a detection area outside the bag in the enclosure. Before starting the test phase, the bag is additionally filled with an amount of helium. A detection detects information representative of helium partial pressure in the internal volume, to allow detection of helium escaping from the bag, by analysis of a helium partial pressure drop. A small amount of nitrogen is sufficient to decrease leak rate mean value, so that uncertainty regarding integrity of some bags decreases.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a national stage filing under section 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2020/066690, filed on Jun. 17, 2020, published on Dec. 30, 2020 as WO 2020/260083 A1 which claims priority to European Patent Application No. 19182710.4, filed on Jun. 26, 2019. The entire disclosures of each application are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to systems and methods for detecting a possible loss of integrity of a flexible packaging, for instance a flexible bag intended for receiving a biopharmaceutical fluid.

The term “biopharmaceutical fluid” is understood to mean a product resulting from biotechnology (culture media, cell cultures, buffer solutions, artificial nutrition liquids, blood products and derivatives of blood products) or a pharmaceutical product or more generally a product intended for use in the medical field. Such a product is in liquid, paste, or possibly powder form. The invention also applies to other products subject to similar requirements concerning their packaging. Such products are typically of high added value and it is important to ensure integrity of packaging where such products are contained, particularly the absence of any contamination.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

For storage and transport purposes, it is customary to place such biopharmaceutical fluids in bags having a wall made of plastic that is flexible, closed, and sterile. It is essential that such bags be fluidtight when they receive biopharmaceutical fluid prior to use or during use of the biopharmaceutical fluid, or at least have a satisfactory level of fluidtightness, so that their possible content is preserved from any deterioration originating externally to the bag, such as contamination. It is therefore necessary to be able to easily detect any loss of integrity of the bag before, during, or after use.

Various methods are currently known for verifying the integrity of a bag suitable for containing a biopharmaceutical fluid. A first known method consists of a physical test to determine if the wall of the bag has a leak or hole. Patent EP 2,238,425 describes a method in which the pressure inside an empty and sterile bag is increased between two plates which limit its expansion. A porous material is placed between the wall of the bag and each plate to prevent the contact of the wall and the expansion-limiting plates from concealing any leaks. The bag is inflated and then the variation of the pressure inside the bag (in a state where the bag is sandwiched/restrained between the two plates) is measured. A pressure drop inside the bag is analyzed. If there is bag leakage, in such a restrained state, the measured pressure falls over time below a given threshold, which allows concluding a loss of integrity.

Patent US 2014/0165707 discloses another method for testing the integrity of a bag. The bag is placed in a compartment and a structured permeable reception layer is placed between the bag and the compartment. The bag is then connected to a source of filling fluid in order to generate a predetermined positive pressure therein. Then the pressure variation in the bag is analyzed to determine whether it is fluidtight and therefore intact. Similarly, also known are U.S. Pat. No. 8,910,509 or US 2014/0083170 which describe a portable device for verifying the integrity of a bag wherein the bag is filled with air, preferably sterile, before measuring the pressure therein in order to detect any loss of integrity.

There are also other known methods for verifying integrity using an inert tracer gas. For example, an integrity test using Helium as gas tracer, involves placing an entire bag in a fluid-tight enclosure and then creating a vacuum in the enclosure once it is hermetically closed around the bag. A specific amount of helium (He) is then introduced into the bag. If there is bag leakage, a mass spectrometer detects abnormal presence of helium outside the bag in the enclosure volume. Documents US 2017/205307 and EP 3 499 207 A1 describe such test methods.

These physical test methods are suitable for testing integrity of flexible container or bag, provided that it can prove absence of leak path down to a size as from which no microbiological ingress is possible. The most sensitive method, known at that time and suitable for flexible containers is the gas tracer method.

Current gas tracer measuring devices (Mass spectrometers) are able to detect low partial pressures representative of micro-leaks far below 2 μm. However, the detection of leak size below 2 μm encounters other limitations. In order to have a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio, a 2 μm leak size already requires working with a level of residual He in vacuum chamber below the natural concentration/partial pressure of He in air at 1000 mbar and typically below natural partial pressure of He in vacuum (5.10-3 mbar). When performing the test practically, residual He in vacuum chamber creates a background noise that hides the leak to be detected.

In the case of flexible plastic containers, the measurement of conforming product is affected by several sources of noise, which increase signal amplitude (one of them being natural He concentration/partial pressure) so that the leak rate cannot be easily identified (the signal representing rate measured in case of a good bag that should pass the test can be similar to a kind of signal representing defective products).

The noise may be caused by various conditions, depending on humidity levels in the enclosure, flexibility and/or physicochemical state of the bag. Despite gas barrier films that are typically present in the flexible bag or similar device under test, permeation of helium through plastic film creates a leak rate even for tight products.

There is a need for a method that provides a very high level of sensitivity (down to 10-8 mbar·L/sec), for obtaining quantifiable and reliable results, and the possibility to partly or fully automate the process, integrating it directly into the manufacturing line too if required.

Current physical methods are ineffective for detecting microleaks in the bag, for example holes smaller than two microns in diameter. In addition, detection of a leak due to a hole smaller than 2 microns is difficult to detect because the leak rate is often too small to distinguish from the background leak rate or noise inherent to the bag (permeation of helium cannot be prevented, even when using an oxygen barrier layer such as EVOH). However, it is known that some microorganisms can pass through a hole smaller than this size, in particular through a hole of sub-micrometric size under specific conditions such as during immersion bacteriological challenge test for example. The use of the physical test methods described above therefore does not ensure the absence of microbial entry into the bag under such specific conditions.

There is therefore a need, in the specific field of the invention, for efficiently testing a bag intended to be filled with biopharmaceutical fluid, while detecting micrometric and sub-micrometric holes as small as possible when testing the integrity of such bag before its use, simply and with the same level of reliability, or even with a higher level of reliability, than the methods currently known or used.

OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

For improving situation, embodiments of the invention provide a testing system for verifying the integrity of a flexible bag, using a gas tracer, comprising:an enclosure delimiting a chamber (vacuum chamber) in which an internal volume is fluid-tightly isolated from outside of the enclosure in an operating configuration of the enclosure;a gas tracer supplying device provided with a feeding pipe for filling an inner volume of the flexible bag at a filling step with the gas tracer, via an outlet of the feeding pipe when the flexible bag is placed in the vacuum chamber so as to be surrounded by the internal volume, the inner volume of the flexible bag being suitable for receiving and holding the gas tracer in the absence of a leak (no defect);a vacuum suction assembly for performing vacuum suction and extracting gas from the internal volume outside the flexible bag, in a suction mode;a vacuum suction line for performing vacuum suction and extracting gas from inside the flexible bag, in a suction mode, the vacuum suction line comprising a valve;at least one sensor associated with the vacuum chamber and capable of sensing the gas tracer external to the inner volume of the flexible bag, in a detection area of the internal volume, the detection area communicating with a suction inlet of the vacuum suction assembly; the testing system further comprising:a first valve arrangement comprising at least one first valve for delivering additional pressure inside the flexible bag;a second valve arrangement comprising second valves that belong to the vacuum suction assembly and to the vacuum suction line, the second valves being each in an open state (active state) so as to allow helium from air, initially contained inside the flexible bag and inside the chamber, to be extracted;a pressure controlling device connected to the first valve arrangement and to the second valve arrangement, the pressure controlling device being configured to inject and maintain a gaseous content of nitrogen inside the flexible bag at a predetermined pressure below a pressure threshold, after vacuum suction by the vacuum suction assembly and vacuum suction by the vacuum suction line have been performed, in order to keep the flexible bag in an inflated state in the vacuum chamber before the filling step;an analysis module using information representative of evolution over time of a gas tracer partial pressure detected using the at least one sensor before and after the filling step, the analysis module being configured to detect a gas tracer leak reflecting a flexible bag integrity defect, on the basis of said information;
and wherein, before the filling step, the pressure controlling device is configured to successively:actuate the vacuum suction assembly and the vacuum suction line;then trigger selective injection of the gaseous content of nitrogen in a closed or inactive state of a determined valve of the first valve arrangement;and then trigger the gas tracer supplying device, by setting the determined valve in an open or active state, to initiate the filling step.

The information representative of evolution over time of the gas tracer partial pressure (helium partial pressure for instance) may be a time derivative and/or a leak rate (expressed in mbar·L·s-2 or mbar·L·s-1, respectively). Such information may be analyzed in view of similar information recorded with an integral (non-defective) test sample.

Typically, the analysis module may be adapted to use information representative of evolution over time of helium partial pressure or similar gas tracer partial pressure detected by the sensor, before and after the filling step, in order to obtain a test result representative of a helium partial pressure drop in the detection area.

The analysis module is configured to:use information representative of detected helium partial pressure detected by the sensor after selective injection of the gaseous content of nitrogen inside the flexible bag, for a period that includes a period subsequent to the filling step, when the vacuum suction assembly is in the suction mode;subtract a determined background value from raw measurements, after determining the determined background value on the basis of information representative of helium partial pressure detected by the at least one sensor before the filling step, when the vacuum suction assembly is in the suction mode; andcompare the test result to at least one reference result, so as to determine if the flexible bag filled with nitrogen and helium is considered to have or not to have passed the integrity verification.

Subtracting the determined background value may be performed after adding tracer gas in the internal volume. Assuming Helium is the tracer gas, injection of nitrogen may be a step dependent on value of the first time derivative of Helium partial pressure in the detection area. Injection is typically done after a calculation routine and only if a condition is met (such condition may typically reflect bad context for direct analysis). Indeed, for each test, the analysis module is calculating a first time derivative of the partial pressure of Helium in the detection area; when partial pressure of Helium measured in the detection area reaches a trigger point (meaning noise is small enough to trigger the measurement phase), it is checked if the first time derivative of partial pressure of Helium is in a predetermined range (between a lower limit and an upper limit). If the “slope” (in leak rate graph) is outside the suitable range (i.e. range not representative of measurements considered as repeatable), Nitrogen injection is performed by opening a specific valve, in response to a command from the pressure controlling device. This will allow detecting lower leak rate, due to stabilization effect.

Conversely, if the first time derivative of partial pressure of Helium is inside the predetermined range, there is no need for nitrogen injection (no need for stabilization effect). Subtracting the determined background value may be performed without such injection and conclusion of the test is obtained in a more conventional manner.

The test result may be representative of the end of the helium partial pressure drop in the detection area. It can thus be determined, at the end of a usual duration (for instance period of about 2.5 seconds) of the partial pressure variation due to the inflation of the bag. If the test result reflects a sufficient decrease in helium partial pressure as such decrease in helium partial pressure is observed when there is no leak in the bag under test.

With such arrangement, the testing system reduces impact of the following limitations:flexibility of the bag or similar container, which artificially creates an increase in the helium rate (leak rate) when measured during its filling with helium (decrease of the internal volume around the inflated bag causing increase in pressure (partial pressure of helium) within the chamber),

variable tracer gas release during test time due to tracer gas desorption from tested material.

Indeed, injection of nitrogen inside the flexible bag before the filling step, while the testing system is in a suction mode, may be advantageous as it has been observed leak rate mean value decreases for conforming bags (it decreases the bump of leak rate in first seconds of test). This is because desorption from surface of the bag material in test phase is performed more homogenously, volume variation of the bag being highly reduced when having a pre-pressurization of nitrogen during the prior phase called “background waiting time” phase. In other words, the testing system is advantageous to have the background value regulated (for helium leak rate or similar gas tracer rate which remains inside the vacuum chamber—despite the vacuum).

The pressure controlling device, coupled to a source of gaseous Nitrogen, may be considered as a part of a regulating system for regulating amount of helium able to be desorbed present in the inner volume just before the filling step. The inventors have observed that there is finally less variation due to desorption and/or due to the movement of the bag wall as it is less inflated at the filling step. The measurements are accurate and form repeatable measurements.

It has been advantageously observed that, for a flexible bag of a volume comprised between 50 mL and 50 L, the testing system can efficiently detect a leak with leak sizes below 2 micrometers in the flexible bag, typically around 0.2 micrometers. It means that the testing system is also efficient to efficiently detect a leak having a sub-micrometric size or of about 1 or 2 micrometers for bags of larger capacity.

More generally, such testing system increases efficiency of the test for pouches having a wide range of capacities, including pouches of larger capacity, for instance from 50 L to 650 L (for example using a specifically sized testing system for high pouch capacity superior to 50 L).

When a subtracting step is performed to subtract a background value determined in the preparation phase (before the filling step), the analysis module can typically use information representative of evolution over time of helium partial pressure detected by the sensor (which may be any pressure measurement member) before the filling step, so as to determine such background value (for instance a leak rate value) to be subtracted to the raw measurements (about the leak rate) as obtained shortly after the filling step.

In some embodiments, specific injection of nitrogen inside the bag before the filling step could be made through a porous material.

Optionally, there is an acceptance threshold, which may be lower than 2.00 10-8 mbar·L·s-1, in order to determine or not if the bag passes the integrity test.

As the bag reaches an inflated state after an initial suction phase and before reaching a low threshold for the leak rate, the helium background value related to helium which remains inside the vacuum chamber (despite the vacuum) cannot vary with as various profiles as in previous methods. In other words, the testing method is suitable to decrease standard deviation of leak rate measurement after subtracting the background value from raw measurement.

Moreover, the testing system may operate with a very short test time (about 3 to 4 seconds for instance after starting the filling step), to avoid negative effect due to permeation of helium through plastic film of the bag under test. Regulation effect due to the nitrogen injection inside the bag prevents the drawback that (within such short test times) the leak rate measurement of conforming flexible containers is randomly affected by the flexibility of the bag (i)) and the tracer gas desorption (ii)).

Finally at the end of a test, if no detectable increase of the helium leak rate is observed, the flexible bag (which may have a single envelope) is considered conform to prevent a microorganism from traveling from outside to inside the bag. More precisely, the increased accuracy can confirm that there is no hole of greater size than a minimal sub-micrometric size detectable when regulating the amount of helium present in the inner volume just before the filling step.

More generally, comparison between the test result and the reference result may be performed on the basis of a test result reflecting evolution over time of the helium partial pressure in a time slot comprised between 1 second and 10 seconds after starting the filling step, preferably between 3 seconds and 10 seconds. In such time slot, the effect of permeation is sufficiently low or not significant, which provides a great accuracy of the test. Of course, the steps can be chronologically controlled and addition of the amount of nitrogen may typically be performed at a predetermined moment, before the filling step and with a time interval (between the introduction of the amount of helium for the internal volume and start of the filling step) that is adapted to regulate the bump or pressure drop present in the graph of leak rate in the vacuum chamber. The bump is a short increase of Helium partial pressure because of bag inflation at the time of filling with helium.

Typically, the pressure controlling device is configured to inject nitrogen below a pressure threshold, so that a pressure in the flexible bag remains relatively low. Such pressure may be comprised between 10 mbar to 100 mbar, so that it is a positive pressure greater than pressure provided in the internal volume outside the flexible bag. Optionally, the difference in pressure may be inferior to 100 mbar and superior to 1 mbar.

Optionally, the pressure controlling device is a control unit configured to control:a first valve allowing circulation of helium in the feeding pipe in the filling step; anda second valve allowing circulation of nitrogen in a feeding member of the feeding pipe.

The second valve may be arranged between a source of gaseous nitrogen and a feeding member connected to same port of the bag which is used for later injection of helium (filling step).

According to another aspect, the pressure controlling device is a control unit configured to control the gas tracer supplying device and to control another gas tracer supplying device. For instance, the gas tracer supplying device is a first helium supplying device, the gas tracer being helium, the system further comprising a second helium supplying device for adding helium in the internal volume outside the flexible bag, the second helium supplying device comprising a feeding member that is:distinct from the feeding pipe,communicating with a helium source.

Optionally, the determined valve, preferably a solenoid valve, is provided to allow gas communication between a nitrogen source and the inside of the flexible bag, for an inactive state of the vacuum suction line.

The testing system comprises two plates that are in a spaced relationship, preferably parallel; and a housing for receiving the flexible bag between the two plates, the plates forming constraining plates for constraining expansion of the flexible bag when filled with helium during filling step.

Typically, the two plates also form constraining plates for constraining expansion of the flexible bag before the filling step, when nitrogen is injected in the bag. Besides, the two plates entirely extend inside the vacuum chamber.

Optionally, the two plates are two vertical plates configured for restraining inflation of the bag before the filling step.

Using another option, the two plates are two horizontal plates configured for restraining inflation of the bag before the filling step. Optionally, a top plate of the two horizontal plates may slide vertically upward toward a second position, from a first position. Injection of nitrogen is adjusted to allow the top plate to move upward to the second position.

In various embodiments of the invention, one and/or the other of the following particulars may possibly also be employed, separately or in combination:a port of the flexible bag connects the flexible bag to a pressurization system including the gas tracer supplying device, using the feeding pipe.a port of the flexible bag connects the flexible bag to a pressurization system including a source of nitrogen, using the feeding pipe.the vacuum chamber is a hermetically sealed detection chamber.the flexible bag is a sterilized bag for positioning in the vacuum chamber, the inner space of the flexible bag being suitable for receiving and holding the detectable gas (gas tracer) in the absence of a leak.the testing system may comprise at least one source of pressurized gas tracer intended to be introduced inside the flexible bag.the vacuum suction line may be made separate from the vacuum suction assembly or be made as part of a common vacuum suction apparatus that includes the vacuum suction assembly.the pressure controlling device works as a control unit for emptying gas from the chamber and from the bag, with higher vacuum outside the flexible bag to prevent the bag from collapsing.the pressure controlling device is configured to have the following steps performed successively: emptying the chamber and emptying the bag/injecting nitrogen inside the bag until the bag is sandwiched between the two plates (with respective opposite contacts)/injection of gas tracer inside the bag/measuring the leak rate of gas tracer.the first valve arrangement comprises at least one valve disposed between a source of pressurized nitrogen and the feeding pipe.the first valve arrangement comprises at least one valve disposed between a source of pressurized nitrogen and at least one auxiliary feeding pipe intended to be connected to a port of the flexible bag, the auxiliary feeding pipe being separate from the feeding pipe.the at least one source of pressurized helium is a helium source including a single tank outside the internal volume for containing all helium to be injected in the chamber, the single tank being operatively coupled to the first helium supplying device and to the second helium supplying device.a source of helium, preferably pressurized helium, extends adjacent the bag and/or is embedded as a part of the bag (actuation of a valve, associated to such embedded source of helium, may be optionally performed by remote control means).the testing system comprises two plates (preferably rigid plates) that are in a spaced relationship, preferably parallel, and a housing for receiving the flexible bag between the two plates, the plates preferably forming constraining plates for constraining expansion of the flexible bag when filled with helium during filling step.the two plates are stationary plates.

In various embodiments, one or more of the following may possibly be used, separately or in combination:the bag has an outer envelope/wall delimiting a single internal space of the bag;the outer wall of the bag comprises a port suitable for being closed or connected in a fluidtight and removable manner to a source of gas or fluid;the bag is provided with a fill and/or discharge tube, which is located outside the outer envelope/wall.the bag may include one or more connectors, filters, sensors.

It is also optionally provided a system for verifying the integrity of a bag according to the invention, comprising:a bag according to the invention,a source of pressurized gas intended to be introduced inside the bag,a member for measuring the pressure of the gas inside the bag, andtwo fixed expansion-limiting plates, spaced apart from and facing one another, suitable for not obstructing any leak in the wall of the second envelope placed against them.

According to a particular, the expansion-limiting plates are respectively covered with linings that are porous to the gas (helium).

The invention also relates to a test method using tracer gas for verifying the integrity of a flexible bag in order to detect the existence of a possible hole, wherein the test method comprises:in a preparation phase:providing a testing system comprising an enclosure that delimits a vacuum chamber adapted to be fluid-tightly isolated from outside of the enclosure in an operating configuration of the enclosure;providing an injection device suitable for delivery of a tracer gas in the vacuum chamber, the tracer gas being preferably helium;placing the flexible bag in the vacuum chamber and connecting a port of the bag to a feeding pipe in communication with a tracer gas source, the tracer gas being typically helium;performing vacuum suction inside the flexible bag and outside the flexible bag in the vacuum chamber, using vacuum suction means;pre-pressurizing an inner volume of the flexible bag, using nitrogen, below a pressure threshold, in order to obtain vacuum outside the flexible bag in an internal volume of the vacuum chamber, while the flexible bag remains in an inflated state due to a gaseous content of nitrogen in the inner volume;in a test phase, while said vacuum suction is still performed outside the flexible bag in an internal volume of the vacuum chamber:filling the inner volume of the flexible bag with an amount of the tracer gas at a filling step, using at least one first valve in an open or active state, the first valve being separate from second valves of a valve arrangement involved for allowing helium from air initially contained inside the flexible bag and inside the chamber to be extracted;detecting information representative of helium partial pressure outside the flexible bag in the internal volume, to allow detection of helium escaping from the flexible bag, by using at least one sensor;then, in a subsequent step, comparing a test result representative of a tracer gas partial pressure drop in the internal volume outside the flexible bag, which is obtained using the at least one sensor, to at least one reference result, so as to determine if the flexible bag is considered to have or not to have passed the integrity verification.

With such method, sensitivity is good due to more stable conditions. All the steps can be performed in a same measuring cycle (for instance with a substantially constant suction performed by at least one vacuum pump or similar vacuum means). Accordingly, 1 μm leak detection limit (and sub-micrometer leak detection) is available in efficient manner, for instance to insure/verify the integrity against micro-organisms under immersion BCT (Bacterial Challenge Testing) conditions.

Unlike previous methods with analysis of a pressure drop, the detection method is not at risk on larger container (such as 3D bags, typically having 10-L, 50-L or larger capacity), due to decrease of standard deviation of Leak rate measurement after subtracting the background value from raw measurement.

Such method may be used to calculate a leak rate based on determination of helium partial pressure in the test chamber (typically by using a mass spectrometer) and then compare such calculated leak rate to an acceptance criteria (threshold value), in order to determine whether the tested flexible bag passes or fails the test.

In order that the measurement is sensitive enough, subtracting the background makes the test more efficient and reliable.

According to a particular embodiment, in the test phase:comparison between the test result and the reference result is performed based on helium partial pressure measured in a time slot comprised between 3 seconds and 10 seconds after starting the filling step, preferably in a time slot comprised between 3 and 6 seconds;and/or comparison between the test result and the reference result is performed by taking into account a pressure drop background value obtained after nitrogen injection and before the filling step, the test result being determined on the basis of raw measurements obtained in a time slot comprised between 3 seconds and 10 seconds after starting the filling step.

The tracer gas is helium and the test method comprises, in the preparation phase:performing vacuum suction inside the flexible bag to empty an internal space of the flexible bag;measuring the partial pressure of Helium in a detection area of the internal volume (outside the bag);calculating a first time derivative of the partial pressure of Helium in the detection area (using a sensor, mass spectrometer or similar pressure measurement member);

wherein, when partial pressure of Helium measured in the detection area reaches a trigger point (i.e. such pressure has sufficiently decreased (high vacuum), meaning noise is small enough to trigger the measurement phase), it is checked if the first time derivative of partial pressure of Helium is in a predetermined range, between a lower limit and an upper limit, and only if the first time derivative of partial pressure of Helium is outside the predetermined range, pre-pressurization with nitrogen inside the flexible bag is performed by an injection device including a valve of the first valve arrangement.

According to a particular embodiment, in the preparation phase, pre-pressurization with nitrogen is performed inside the flexible bag during/for a background waiting period required to determine a background value, preferably after a helium partial pressure has been measured in the internal volume as low as or below a predetermined threshold. Such threshold is below 5.10-3 mbar (typically 4.10-3 mbar or below), which means that the threshold typically corresponds to helium pressure lower than helium partial pressure in ambient air.

It means that before the test phase (i.e. before measures are used for the helium integrity test), the bag has been significantly inflated to cause some additional helium desorption, in conditions of low helium partial pressure around the bag.

Optionally, the reference result is or reflects a predefined pressure drop threshold, obtained by calculating a time derivative of a helium leak rate as detected by at least one pressure measurement member in a detection area of the internal volume.

A leak may be detected as helium leaking from the bag would reduce or annihilate the partial pressure drop (pressure quick decrease) that should be normally present when there is no leak.

According to a particular embodiment, the filling step is performed in order to have the flexible bag maintained between two expansion-limiting plates, spaced apart from and facing one another, suitable for not obstructing any leak in the wall of the flexible bag placed against them. This may be of interest to control expansion of the internal space of the bag. A porous layer may be used to form the contact against the outer wall of the bag.

According to a particular embodiment, the flexible bag constitutes or is a part of a device under test intended to receive biopharmaceutical product and is provided with several flexible pipes each connected to a respective port of the device under test, the device under test being placed in the chamber before performing vacuum suction.

Optionally, in the preparation phase, performing vacuum suction implies evacuating gas at different suction areas of the enclosure, in order to obtain vacuum inside the flexible bag and outside the flexible bag in the enclosure.

Typically, the pre-pressurization with nitrogen inside the flexible bag is a step performed after obtaining a pressure inside the flexible bag which is a pressure below a threshold reflecting a sufficient vacuum.

Optionally, the pre-pressurization with nitrogen inside the flexible bag is a step performed before reaching a helium pressure as low as 5.10-3 mbar outside the flexible bag in the enclosure.

The invention also relates to a system for verifying the integrity of a bag according to the invention, comprising a gas detection member.

In various embodiments of the invention one and/or the other of the following may possibly also be employed, separately or in combination:the system comprises:a bag according to the invention,a source of pressurized gas intended to be introduced into the intermediate space,a control unit including a gas pressure control and management member; andthe system further comprises an outer container or enclosure adapted and intended for receiving the bag in its entirety.

MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A detailed description of several embodiments of the invention is provided below, accompanied with examples and with reference to the drawings.

In the various figures, the same references are used to designate identical or similar elements.

Referring toFIG.1, it is shown a testing system1for verifying the integrity of a flexible bag2, the system comprising a an enclosure10, one or more sources of pressurized helium4and a pressure measurement member, here constructed as a sensor unit or sensor9, that is typically suitable to provide measures reflecting partial pressure of helium in a chamber CH delimited by the enclosure10. The chamber CH forms an airtight closed space (and thus isolated from the ambient air).

The enclosure10may be provided with opposite faces delimiting a receiving compartment for a flexible bag2. Optionally, two plates12,14, for instance two rigid plate members, are provided to delimit the compartment where the bag2is located. The bag2is typically introduced in the chamber CH, here in the compartment, in a non-inflated state/non-filled state. Only a small amount of air due to the pressure balancing may be initially present in the bag2as introduced in the chamber CH. This is advantageous to limit amount of gas to be evacuated. At least one port, here only one port11of the bag2may provide communication between internal space SP of the bag2and the source of pressurized helium4.

When the enclosure10is tightly closed, the outer wall W of the bag2may be seen as a partition wall, made of plastic material (typically plastic without any mineral or metal layer), between the internal space SP inside the bag2and the internal volume10aaround the bag2which is fluid-tightly isolated from outside of the enclosure10.

The enclosure10has at least one feeding parts to allow a tracer gas to be introduced in the internal space SP. In some variants, two feeding parts may be provided to allow a tracer gas to be introduced in the chamber CH, respectively in the internal space SP and in the internal volume10aoutside the bag2. Typically, the outer wall W of the bag2is the wall directly inflated when filling the bag2with a gaseous content and this outer wall W directly separates the internal space SP from the internal volume10a.

For instance, as illustrated inFIGS.1and4in particular, the testing system1may be provided with a helium supplying device3having a feeding pipe3aor similar injection line27for connecting the source of pressurized helium4to a given port11of the flexible bag2.

In the embodiment ofFIG.1, at least one valve V1is included in the helium supplying device3, such valve V1being arranged between a tank of the source of pressurized helium4and the outlet3bfor connection with the port11of the bag2. The source of pressurized helium4typically comprises or is a helium source including a single tank (outside the chamber CH) for containing all helium to be injected in the chamber CH, the single tank being operatively coupled to the helium supplying device3. In variants, several tanks or separate helium sources may be used.

The testing system1is provided with a leak detector assembly that comprises the sensor9, the enclosure10, a control unit acting as a pressure controlling device20and a communication assembly28or similar interface coupled to the pressure controlling device20, valves V1, V2or V2′, V3, V4to be actuated during a measuring cycle by the control and communication assembly28and/or the pressure controlling device20. The pressure controlling device20may be provided with an analysis module15using information representative of helium partial pressure detected by the sensor9during a measuring cycle such as illustrated inFIG.6.

A mass spectrometer is typically provided to form the pressure measurement member or sensor9, such mass spectrometer having or being in communication with a detection area10dwhere pressure drop PD (drop due to quick variation of helium partial pressure in the chamber CH around the bag2that has been inflated and filled with helium) can be measured and analyzed. A pressure drop PD is systematically created after starting filling the bag2with helium when a difference in pressure is generated between the internal space SP of the bag2and the internal volume10aaround the bag2(with increase in concentration in the internal volume10a).

According to preferred embodiments, the pressure drop PD is attenuated due to pre-pressurization of the flexible bag2, as it will be described further below.

The mass spectrometer is suitable for tracer gas detection (helium detection), in particular if a vacuum is created in the enclosure10prior to the phase of testing the bag2with the system1.

In embodiments ofFIGS.1and5, the testing system1is used to detect the integrity of the outer wall W of the bag2, such wall W extending entirely within the limits of the chamber, typically between the two plates12,14present inside the chamber CH.

The enclosure10of the testing system1is here an outer container in which the bag1according to the invention can be placed. The outer container is larger than the bag2(or symmetrically the bag2is smaller than such outer container), so that the bag2in inflated state remains inside the chamber CH. Optionally, the enclosure10may comprise a lining porous to the gas inside the chamber10, such lining being a contact part in contact with the bag2at least when the bag is in inflated state after the bag2is in an inflated condition by using a gaseous content of nitrogen and/or after an additional filling step where the bag2is filled with helium (inert tracer gas). The lining, against which the bag2is placed, does not block any leakage of the outer wall W when the bag2under test is placed inside the chamber CH.

The outer container forming the enclosure10may in particular consist in a box or a rigid or semi-rigid fluid tight shell. More particularly, in one configuration, the enclosure has a parallelepiped shape. The enclosure10may comprise an opening for introducing the bag1, which can be selectively open or closed. To this end, the outer container of the enclosure10may comprise for example a removable cover or door provided with members for gripping and handling. Where appropriate, gripping members are provided for quickly locking the cover in the closed position, capping the opening.

Referring toFIG.1, the testing system1comprises a source4of pressurized gas (here pressurized helium in this non-limiting embodiment) and a line including the feeding pipe3afor the injection of pressurized helium, able to be associated in fluid communication or being associated in fluid communication with the outlet of the port11of the bag1.

The helium supplying device3is connected to the enclosure10at a location distinct/separate from the port30or pipe connecting the pressure measurement member or sensor9to the chamber CH.

The testing system1also comprises another source of pressurized gas, here a source24of pressurized nitrogen. Referring toFIG.1, the source24may be connected to the feeding pipe3a, using one or more connection points between the helium supplying device3and the port11.

As illustrated in the embodiment ofFIG.4, this source24can also be connected to another port of the bag2, for example the port11via a specific injection line27.

The source is suitable to inject an amount of gaseous nitrogen that represents a pressure comprised between 1 mbar and 3 mbar for a variety of bags2. Such pressure can be lower than 25 or 100 mbar. More generally, it is understood that the pressure controlling device20can inject and maintain a gaseous content of nitrogen, supplied from the source24, inside the flexible bag2at a predetermined pressure below a pressure threshold. Pressure inside the flexible bag2may be provided in the internal volume10aoutside the flexible bag2, so that the bag is in an inflated state suitable to attenuate undesirable deviations when having the pressure drop PD.

An amount of nitrogen (in gaseous state, of course) is intended to be inserted into the internal space SP of the bag2via the port11or any other suitable port (port12binFIG.4) and appropriate connecting elements of the nitrogen supplying device200that includes the source24. It is understood that nitrogen is a gas neutral and non-toxic to the biopharmaceutical fluid that can form content of the bag2, in order not to contaminate the biopharmaceutical fluid. The same applies for helium or equivalent inert gas that can act as tracer gas, which is injected in the internal space SP after nitrogen.

WhileFIG.1shows the outer wall W under the form of a single wall of the bag, the bag2may be provided, in variants, with one or more external parts partly covering the outer wall W and in spaced relationship relative to the outer wall W.

As illustrated inFIG.2, the flexible bag2in the folded state has two opposing flat faces, with ports11and12a-12being provided on one of these main faces. The two other faces are folded. The bag portions forming these two other faces are sheets of plastic material, which have the shape of flattened bellows (forming tow opposite gussets) and are inserted between the two initially flat sheets forming the opposing faces. The flat state of the flexible bag2, as obtained immediately after manufacture, is allowed by the superposition of weld seams61,61′ and62,62′. The free edges2eand2fmay be rectilinear edges of the bag2. Thanks to a typically hexagonal shape of the opposite faces, the bag2may easily reach a parallelepiped shape, by expansion of the gussets and folding along the parallel folding lines FL1, FL2(with L1being a distance separating the folding lines FL1, FL2of a same plastic sheet of the bag2.

This a non-limiting example of 3D flexible pouch or bag2. The parallel folding lines FL1, FL2, as obtained in inflated/filled state of the bag2, are predetermined folding lines formed in the main opposite face of the bag2(unlike 2D containers).

Such a bag2comprises a bottom wall, a top wall, and a flexible side wall which may be in two extreme states—folded flat, or unfolded and deployed—and be reshaped to change from one to the other of these states or be in any intermediate state. When the flexible bag2is filled with biopharmaceutical fluid or filled with gas during a test, it is inflated to a greater or lesser degree. It may form a parallelepiped container. While its bottom wall can rest on the inner face of the base of the enclosure10or inner face of a constraining plate12,14, its side wall is deployed toward the inner face of the side wall of the enclosure.

The flexible bag2is here illustrated as having a hexagonal shape in a non-filled state. Each of the sheets forming the bag2may have a length L1which is greater than a longer side L2of hexagonal shape the flexible bag2in the non-inflated/non-filled state (shape clearly visible inFIG.2).

It is understood that the length L1of the flexible bag2in its initial state before filling, when measured from the lower end2ato the upper end2b, is greater than the height of the flexible bag or pouch2in its deployed and filled state (this height being substantially equal to length L2, for instance).

The flexible pouch or bag2has here one or more inlet or filling or supply openings, in particular in the form of ports12a-12b(which may form upper ports), in particular in the top wall, and one or more outlet or discharge or evacuation openings, in particular in the bottom wall, in particular in the form of ports11. The outer wall W of the bag2thus may be provided with at least two orifices, in other words two passages, at least one for filling with a biopharmaceutical fluid, and at least one orifice for discharging the biopharmaceutical fluid.

Preferably, any line7,9a,9bconnected to the bag2, here to a same face of the bag,2bis referred to as a flexible supply line. Furthermore, each of flexible lines7and9a-9bis preferably equipped with a clamping member such as clamp C1, C2, C3.

The inlet openings are adapted to be closed when necessary and/or a clamp member C1-C2is used to close off access to the interior of the flexible pouch2. Similarly, the outlet opening or openings are adapted to be open when necessary and/or a clamp member C3is used to allow passage through the flexible line7. The fill orifice and discharge orifice of the wall W are respectively associated by fluidtight connections with fill tubes. For example, the fill orifices at the ports12a-12bare associated to the flexible line9aand the flexible line9b(typically with clamps C1and C2shifted away from the ports12a-12b).

While the illustrated embodiment shows use of port11for filling with helium, any one of the fill orifices and outlet opening may be used for filling with helium an internal space SP of the flexible bag2, provided that it is connected to a source4of pressurized helium by a corresponding flexible line, while the other flexible lines are in a closed state. InFIG.4, the port11where helium is injected in the internal space of the flexible bag2may be an outlet orifice. The other lines may be attached, using a fixture device39, while clamps (here clamps C1, C2) prevent any escape of helium present in the bag2into the chamber CH, in the internal volume10aaround the bag2.

Now referring toFIG.4, it can be seen that clamps C1, C2, C3may be used to hermetically close the flexible bag2when placed in the enclosure10. In variants, the flexible lines7,9a,9bof the bag2may be each linked to a vacuum circuit, for instance a same vacuum circuit.

The testing system may be provided with a valve arrangement including the valve V2′ arranged between the source24of pressurized nitrogen and an auxiliary feeding pipe3cthat is here connected to the port12b. It can be seen that the auxiliary feeding pipe3cis separate from the feeding pipe3aused for gas tracer injection.

In some variants, the bag2comprises an envelope that may be 2D, in which two wall members are directly joined to one another. The bag2may also have an envelope of the 3D type, in other words three-dimensional. The wall W then typically include the two parts that form the main faces, such two parts being fixedly and sealingly connected to two side gussets by four longitudinal fluidtight weld seams61,61′ and62,62′ (and two transverse weld seams).

As illustrated inFIGS.2and5-6, it can be seen that suction has to be performed, in order to decrease pressure in the chamber CH. When remaining pressure is sufficiently low, the monitoring phase (test phase) of the measuring cycle may be performed. The test phase is here starting at to. Steps VS1and VS2, as illustrated inFIG.3, respectively reflect a vacuum suction performed for the internal volume10aand a vacuum suction performed for the internal space SP. Such steps VS1and VS2have to be performed before using the nitrogen to inflate the bag2. Indeed, before injecting nitrogen, air present in the chamber CH has to be emptied. The vacuum suction assembly (P1, P3) may be involved to perform vacuum suction in chamber CH, while the vacuum suction line P2is used to decrease pressure in the internal space SP. Typically, vacuum in the chamber CH must be greater to prevent the bag2from collapsing. In the non-limiting example ofFIG.3, the following steps are successively performed:Vacuum suction step VS1for emptying the chamber CH;Vacuum suction step VS2for emptying the bag2;Pre-pressurization step PPS, by injecting nitrogen (i.e. gaseous N2) in the internal space SP of the bag2until the outer wall W of the bag2is in contact with the plates12,14;Filling step FS, in which helium (i.e. gaseous He) is injected in the internal space SP of the bag2, so that the bag2reaches an enhanced inflated state, with nitrogen and helium contained in the internal space SP;Test phase T, started after t0, to estimate integrity of the bag2based on information supplied by the sensor9after a pressure drop PD.

At the beginning of the measuring cycle, the testing system1may be similar to known systems in that it is required to reach a low pressure threshold in the chamber CH, after a waiting period T1. The valve V1is actuated at t0to obtain an inflated bag2adapted to be tested. But, unlike a bag under test as inFIG.5, an increase in detectable helium has already been performed by inflating the bag2at step VS2, reflected by period b2/inFIG.6. As the valve V2is open, external surface of the outer wall W is inflated and helium adsorbed on this external surface can be detected: this may correspond to a Helium peak as schematically illustrated onFIG.6.

The pressure controlling device20may control the pressurized inflation gas in the feeding pipe3, ordering the injection of tracer gas (helium) when desired (here at t0) and controlling the injection at the desired pressure. A controlling part of the device20may be provided with a pressure gauge, an adjustable valve, and/or a control line between them. The communication assembly28may be used to coordinate steps during a measuring cycle. The communication assembly28may form a part of the pressure controlling device20.

In accordance with preferred embodiments, as shown inFIG.6, the valve V2for operation of the nitrogen supplying device200, allowing circulation of helium toward the internal volume10a, may be temporarily open before opening the valve V1for the filling of the bag2. Due to nitrogen injection at the pre-pressurization step PPS, there is an increase of the partial pressure of helium in the internal volume10a. Unlike a conventional preparing phase (such as shown inFIG.5) without any helium partial pressure increase around the bag2, a specific peak18can be observed in the internal volume10aat a time period of performing suction (using at least the vacuum pump P3, preferably alone), while the bag2is not filled with helium yet.

Referring toFIGS.5and7, when comparing several leak rate curves for conform products under test, it is apparent that after t0, the leak rate as measured by a sensor9can deviate (not forming expected pressure drop PD with significant decrease of the leak rate), so that a curve51for a perfectly intact bag2may be similar to a curve52reflecting situation where the bag2has a hole of about 1 or 2 micrometers size, causing a leak.

Using the specific pre-pressurization step PPS as illustrated inFIG.6, such deviation is greatly minimized and/or test conclusion for conform products is easier. Actually, the problematic case reflected by curve51inFIG.5can optionally be solved, due to significant decrease of the artefact of conforming bags.

Now referring toFIG.1, it is understood that the specific pre-pressurization step PPS, using nitrogen, is allowed before the gas, here helium, is flowing in the feeding pipe3aof the supplying device3. The vacuum pump P1participates to evacuate gas from the chamber CH, typically before starting the pre-pressurization step PPS. The pump P1functions as or is part of a vacuum suction assembly for performing vacuum suction and extracting gas from the internal volume10aoutside the flexible bag2, in a suction mode.

A vacuum pump P2may be associated to the supplying device3. The vacuum pump P2communicates with the feeding pipe3a, for instance via a lateral passage downstream relative to position of the valve V1. This vacuum pump P2is not used during the test phase of the measuring cycle (the valve V4being closed just at t0and just after such closing, the valve V1is open). The vacuum pump P2is of interest to evacuate air from the flexible bag2to then have a reproducible test gas amount or concentration (He) inside the bag2; otherwise, Helium from source4will mix with the rest of the air in the bag2. In a preferred option, as illustrated inFIG.6, the pump P2may operate shortly in the preparing phase after starting suction by the main vacuum pump P1, in order to prevent too great inflation of the bag2. Here, the suction by the pump P2may be stopped well before t0, by closing the associated valve V4. The vacuum pump P2may optionally be used for suction before a measuring cycle and possibly after the measuring cycle.

The sensor9comprises one or more mass spectrometers, typically a mass spectrometer suitable to detect helium concentration (partial pressure) in the detection area10dof the internal volume10a. Here, the detection area10ddirectly communicates with a suction inlet of the vacuum suction assembly, which is inlet of vacuum pump P1for instance in embodiment illustrated inFIG.1.

At least one vacuum pump P3may be associated to the mass spectrometer. Another pump (secondary pump, not shown) may be embedded in the mass spectrometer forming the sensor9. The valve V3may be a conventional valve for such mass spectrometer, which is typically provided with a turbo-pump assembly or similar pump means. The detection assembly, forming or including the sensor9, may be chosen amongst some commercially available products, possibly improved to enhance accuracy of measurements.

In a variant, the main vacuum pump P1may be arranged in a line in direct communication with the duct30a, downstream the valve V3. The principle of leak detector in such detection assembly can be based on a sector field mass spectrometer. Analyzed entry gasses (in this case Helium) are ionized in vacuum. Ions of helium are accelerated using added voltage and further separated in the magnetic field. For instance, the ion current is, using a special detector (known per se), turned into an electric current. This current is accelerated and displayed on the screen using leak detection units. The measured current is in direct proportion to helium partial pressure and therefore equal to the measured leak.

Embodiments with another supplying device6, possibly forming a second helium supplying device, is described in relation withFIGS.1and4.

The helium supplying device6for adding helium in the internal volume10a, here from the source of pressurized helium4, comprises a feeding member that is separate from the feeding pipe3a, and a tube32or similar part for diffusion of the helium through a wall having an outer face in the chamber CH in the internal volume10aor delimiting all or part of an area directly communicating with the internal volume10a.

The tube32is typically made of silicone adapted to supply helium by diffusion through a silicone wall or porous type glass wall of the tube32. A face, preferably the interior face, of the tube32delimits an area communicating with the at least one source of pressurized helium4via a pipe of the feeding member5. A valve V6may be a solenoid valve controlled by a control unit including the pressure controlling device. Using a routine in such control unit, the valve V6may be selectively open to cause helium injection that increases helium partial pressure in the internal volume10aaround the bag2, possibly few seconds after the bag2has been inflated (for instance the valve V6may be open after closure of the valve V2).

The helium supplying device6may be provided with a gas permeable wall that comprises a microporous and/or mesoporous membrane of silicone rubber (or optionally a porous glass member), suitable for diffusing helium toward the internal volume10a.

The helium supplying device6can be actuated by a command from the control unit, depending on a result of a calculation performed at early stage, when reaching a low vacuum. Typically, the first time derivative of Helium partial pressure in the detection area10dis analyzed. If such slope is too high or too low, measurements will not considered as repeatable. Here, injection of helium by using the additional helium supplying device6, will be done if the slope as analyzed/determined does not reflect appropriate context for repeatable measurements. Such analysis is performed when Helium partial pressure is as low as 4E-5 mbar (see slope on the left inFIGS.3and4for example).

When partial pressure of Helium measured in the detection area10dreaches a trigger point (meaning noise is small enough to trigger the measurement phase), it is checked if the first time derivative of partial pressure of Helium is in a predetermined range, between a lower limit and an upper limit. Only if the slope as observed on leak rate graphs (such as inFIGS.5-6) is outside the suitable range, the specific Helium injection is performed by the helium supplying device6. The calculation routine to detect need or not for such helium injection is performed at each test, which is of interest as for some tests, accurate result will be obtained quickly, without the injection and without additional waiting period of decrease in Helium partial pressure.

In embodiment ofFIG.1as in many options, there is no need for an additional tracer gas supplying device. Nitrogen injection can also be actuated by a command from a control unit (which may be the pressure controlling device20), depending on a result of a calculation performed at early stage, when reaching a low vacuum. Typically, the first time derivative of Helium partial pressure (or argon or SF6 partial pressure) in the detection area10dis analyzed. If such slope is too high or too low, measurements will not considered as repeatable. Here, injection of nitrogen at the step PPS will be done if the slope as analyzed/determined does not reflect appropriate context for repeatable measurements (same check/comparison as described above, the calculation routine to detect need or not for such gas tracer injection being performed at each test).

The following part describes some options for the preparation phase, such options being preferably used only when it has been determined that initial slope is outside the suitable range (situation ofFIG.6).

Referring toFIG.1, the pressure controlling device20is configured to trigger the nitrogen supplying device200before the tracer gas supplying device3, so that the valve V1is selectively actuated after the valve V2during the measuring cycle for a given bag2under test. The pressure controlling device20also triggers pumps, for example vacuum pumps P1and P2, possibly in a conventional manner. When actuating the pump P1for suction of gas present in the chamber CH (at step a/), a waiting period T1′ is typically required before starting the filling step for inflating the bag2. Indeed, it is usually necessary to wait for a stabilization period to end before proceeding with the test itself.

During this waiting period T1′, as illustrated inFIG.6, the valve V2is open when the helium partial pressure is sufficiently low, so that nitrogen injection is performed inside the bag2. This is done well before the filling step FS (i.e. well before t0) to produce a gas tracer drop (which may serve as reference drop).

Then, in a subsequent step, the pressure drop PD in the intermediate space or internal volume10ais compared, by means of the sensor9coupled to the controlling pressure device20, to a predefined pressure drop threshold. This threshold is for example the value of the pressure drop of a bag2undergoing integrity verification and considered to be intact.

However, if the pressure drop PD is detected with a value (at the end of usual duration) that is greater than the threshold, the outer wall W is considered not to have passed the integrity verification (the bag2failing the test).

Measurements are optionally made in the preparation phase and used to determine a background value for the reference drop due to the nitrogen injection. Such option may be implemented for a range of bags where pressure deviation cause issues for adequately detect leaks and/or for situations where it is required to systematically find leaks of sub micrometric size (for example of about 0.2 micrometers) that form a passage for some specific bacteria. The background value may be determined at the end of the reference drop (end of the peak), when decrease in helium partial pressure is sufficiently low. Such background value is of interest as it reflects physical conditions of the chamber CH around the bag2and the way helium is evacuated with such conditions. Indeed, such situation shows a profile for the helium leak rate when promptly increasing helium partial pressure in the internal volume10a(here due to configuration change of the bag2, toward inflated state, with accelerated release of helium adsorbed on the external surface of the bag2due to such change).

The test phase can begin when the level of the helium partial pressure is below a threshold. Possibly, a same or similar threshold, for example 0.00004 mbar or less may be used by the pressure controlling device20, so as to trigger the nitrogen supplying device200and the tracer gas supplying device3only after reaching a leak rate as low as or below such threshold, which is a predetermined threshold.

Measurements in the test phase reflect the end of the profile of the pressure drop PD. The analysis module15typically uses such measurements (here, helium partial pressure detected by the sensor9) to generate information representative of evolution over time of detected helium partial pressure. The analysis module15comprises a comparison routine to detect a helium leak on the basis of such information. A reference result, typically corresponding to a predefined threshold (predefined pressure drop threshold) is also used by the comparison routine.

In some embodiments, the reference result is a predefined pressure drop threshold, obtained by calculating a time derivative of a helium leak rate as detected by the sensor9in the detection area10d. In variants, duration of the pressure drop PD may be taken into account to determine a reference result, to be compared to a test result obtained at same or similar time reflecting the end of the peak/pressure drop.

More generally, it is understood that the analysis module15may be configured to:use information representative of helium partial pressure detected by the sensor9after addition of nitrogen at the pre-pressurization step PPS, for a period that includes a period subsequent to the filling step FS, when the suction mode is active; andcompare the test result to at least one reference result, in test phase T, so as to determine if the flexible bag2filled with helium is considered to have or not to have passed the integrity verification.

The pressure inside the bag2when performing the step FS and starting the step T can be significantly higher than in conventional tests. Here, in the mixture (gas tracer+nitrogen) inside all the bag2, same N2/He ratio is obtained at the time of ending the helium injection, when there is no hole (no leakage/bag2able to pass the test). The valves V1and V2or V2′ are thus configured to deliver same amounts of gas respectively for each test of a series of tests.

One or more bags2may be tested at same time in a testing system1, possibly using same plate(s) for constraining different bags2. In some embodiments, a plate12or14may be movable, for instance to reach a rear position in abutment against a stationary surface of the enclosure10. Such movable plate may be a top plate extending horizontally above the one or more bags under test.

According to experimental tests for bags varying in capacity, there is no need to inject a too high amount of nitrogen. The amount of N2 may be low to represent less than 5 mbar, for instance between about 1 and 3 mbar, when there is no initial constraint applied (from the top) to the bag2under test. Practically, the ratio between partial pressure of nitrogen and the partial pressure of helium can be between 1:100 or less and 4:100. In some options using a bag2extending horizontally (length of the bag being measured horizontally) under a top plate, the amount of N2 may be greater as the bag pressure has to be sufficient to overcome a residual weight of the top plate. For instance, the partial pressure of N2 can represent around 10% of the partial pressure of helium.

In such option with a movable top containment plate having a residual weight (less than the intrinsic weight due to use of a spring force or similar biasing action), the ratio of helium to nitrogen by partial pressure inside the bag2can increase with increase of the nominal volume of the bag2(here nominal volume is volume as filled with liquid in usual conditions). In any case, the bag2needs not to be filed with an amount of nitrogen representing a pressure superior to 150 or 200 mbar, and helium partial pressure remains significantly higher than nitrogen partial pressure immediately after the filling of the filling step FS.

Besides, series of tests may be performed with:a same short period for injecting helium (typically not superior to about 1 millisecond); anda same gas pressure immediately after the filling step FS, which is for instance comprised between 240 or 250 and 350 mbar.

For bags2having a large capacity, for instance greater than 10 or 20 liters, high thrust is obtained: to prevent excessive thrust, the partial pressure of helium is typically inferior or equal to 350 mbar, preferably not superior to 300 or 310 mbar.

Thanks to the inflated state obtained before the filling step FS, the test phase T ensures the way helium partial pressure is detected outside the bag2is not too dependent on interference/deviations due to high deformation of plastic material of the bag2. The test results, sensitive to helium amount present in the internal volume10a, may thus be considered as consistent.

The analysis module15may include or may be a part of the pressure controlling device20, which is for instance configured as a computer unit including a Central Processing Unit (CPU), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a Read Only Memory (ROM), a flash memory for storing a back-up data or the like, an input interface, and an output interface. Typically, the pressure controlling device20is an Electronic Control Unit (ECU) which electrically controls valves V1, V2or V2′, V3, V4, for instance by comprising the control and management member28. The control and management member28may be provided with a control line28aenabling actuation and/or transmittal of commands to the valves V1, V2or V2′, V3, V4, respectively.

The ROM of the pressure controlling device20stores a program for operating the computer unit as the control unit13. When the CPU executes the program stored in the ROM by using the RAM as a working area, the computer unit functions as the pressure controlling device20of this embodiment. The mass spectrometer or similar pressure measurement member, forming the sensor9for detecting gas in the enclosure10is connected to the input interface of the pressure controlling device20, in order to provide data to the analysis module15. Various control objects including the valves are connected to the output interface of the pressure controlling device20.

Referring toFIG.1, the testing system1may be a complete system provided with one or more sources4of pressurized tracer gas (here helium), the enclosure10, and with the following modules:Helium mass spectrometer leak detector, comprising the mass spectrometer which is made to function as a pressure measurement member/sensor9and optionally an inlet interface19for communication between the chamber CH and the port30or pipe for circulating gas toward the sensor9,Vacuum system coupled to the enclosure10to maintain sufficiently low pressure in the mass spectrometer,Vacuum pumps, including a pump P2to evacuate the tested flexible bag2(typically at step b/illustrated inFIGS.5and6), another pump P3to cause circulation of helium toward the mass spectrometer forming the sensor9(when the mass spectrometer is arranged outside the chamber CH as in the embodiment shown inFIG.1), and possibly a main pump P1used to evacuate the internal volume10aaround the bag2,Valves V1, V2or V2′, V3, V4which control individual steps of a measuring cycle (the preparation phase and the test phase being parts of such measuring cycle), from evacuation to testing to airing,Electronic measuring and control system, which is here made to function as a control unit or pressure controlling device20,Power sources for individual components—valves, circuits, etc.Fixtures and positioning members (which may include the feeding pipe3, the fixture device39and the two plates12,14), which connect in particular the tested product, here the flexible bag2, in the chamber CH of the enclosure10.

Such testing system1is a complete system suitable for detecting a leak, here by simply continuously measuring helium partial pressure and analysis, by the analysis module15of the pressure controlling device20, evolution over time of information representative of such helium partial pressure, so as to detect leaks in the outer wall W of the bag2.

The test method uses so called tracer gas—helium, which is used to fill up the bag2placed in the chamber CH, while the internal volume10aaround/outside the bag2is connected to the detection assembly provided with sensor9.

If Helium quickly leaks out of the tested bag2into the detection area10dwhere helium partial pressure is measured (and possibly displayed on a screen), no significant pressure drop PD can be identified by the analysis module15, which means that detected helium is helium coming from the internal space SP via a hole in the bag2. Indeed, permeability through the bag2(with a plastic wall W typically having a thickness greater than 150 or 200 micrometers) only allows escape of helium after a minimal time period, which may be superior to 4 seconds.

Referring toFIGS.5-6and7, after time t0that reflects moment of filling the bag2with helium (at step c/, the valve V1being open to allow such filling), it can be seen that there is a pressure drop PD, while the minimal time period has not elapsed. Duration of the pressure drop PD is typically inferior to the minimal time period and may be considered as substantially constant. Indeed, for all the experiments, the start and the end of the pressure drop PD are substantially the same. Duration of the pressure drop PD is here about 2.5 or 2.6 seconds, not superior to 3 seconds, with the arrangement of the enclosure10and the kind of detection means used in the testing system1.

During first seconds of test time, after helium injection in the bag2, the flexible bag2slightly inflates (the bag being already in inflated state) and accordingly slightly compresses the remaining air in the vacuum chamber CH outside the bag2(i.e. the internal volume10aslightly decreases).

As a consequence, partial residual helium pressure in chamber CH increases for a short period of time before decreasing again, due to continuous evacuation. It is read by the mass spectrometer as a leak rate increase followed by a decrease, usually called pressure drop PD; whereas the bag2is perfectly tight. InFIG.7, all the bags2under test are perfectly tight but there is no injection of nitrogen in the internal volume10a. It can be seen that it creates an artefact (bump) that reduces the segregation power by a factor1000for the leak detection. The leak rate curves38are exemplary curves (worst cases for bags2that should be identified as test compliant) reflecting a high deviation, causing high loss of the segregation power.

In several tests, when injecting nitrogen by the nitrogen supplying device2006, it has been surprisingly found that curves38are practically not encountered (or less encountered), provided that suction has been efficiently performed after such specific nitrogen.

As a result, when having only curves with late increase after the pressure drop period elapses, such as curve50inFIG.7with late increase of the leak rate after the pressure drop PD or such as curve50′ inFIG.7with relatively quick increase of the leak rate after the pressure drop PD, the analysis module15may use a comparison with a preset reference result reflecting a no-leak state, for example a reference result similar to the case of curve50′. Indeed, if a leak rate may be measured as low or lower than a suitable threshold, for instance 10-7 mbar·L/sec at about 3.5 seconds after t0(or within a time slot around that moment), it may be efficiently concluded that the flexible bag2filled with helium has passed the integrity verification.

OnFIGS.5-6, step d/corresponds to the period, starting at t0or shortly after to, when a monitoring is performed on the basis of the measurements (at least the measurements made after t0), in order to analyze the pressure drop. The horizontal scale may be exaggerated at such step d/to better illustrate the pressure drop PD. The step e/shows that helium partial pressure usually increases after a while, after the end of the pressure drop PD for normal situation (see curve50in particular) where the bag2is leak-free.

Of course, the way the final leak rate value is calculated may vary. For instance, the analysis module15may firstly determine the turning-up point (down point) of the curve50,50′ when the pressure drop PD elapsed and then estimate if the level of leak rate at such turning-up point is sufficiently low (below an acceptance criteria/threshold). If such turning-up point is not present or is found for a value higher that the acceptance threshold, it is concluded that the tested bag2has failed the test.

Advantageously, the acceptance threshold may optionally be lower than 2.00 10-8 mbar·L·s-1.

In the preparation phase, a bag2as described and a system1as described are provided, as illustrated inFIG.4. The bag2is empty (without any biopharmaceutical fluid) and may be initially flat, before initiating steps VS1, VS2and PPS. The line28bfor injecting nitrogen, in connection with the nitrogen supplying device200, may be functionally coupled to the control and management member28, so that the pressure controlling device20can synchronize different gas injections performed in the enclosure10. The enclosure10is provided with an injection line27or similar connection that is part of the helium supplying device3, so that at time t0it is then possible to send the pressurized gas, here helium. Before to, the nitrogen supplying device200is already used to perform the pre-pressurization step PPS, while the bag2is already in the enclosure10(the measuring cycle being started before the nitrogen injection).

Accelerated suction of helium may be obtained due to the nitrogen injection to have the bag2inflated. This may be of interest to have a period T1′ different from conventional period T1, as more helium can be evacuated, provided that t0is dependent from a threshold for helium partial pressure in the internal volume10a. In a preferred option, the period T1′ may be such that helium rate is stabilized. The method advantageously reduces deviation effects for the background noise (background noise that could hide the leak to be detected), especially the background at the time of the pressure drop, following the filling step performed at the beginning in the test phase.

While the above detailed embodiments show use of a source of pressurized helium4, which typically contains helium with usual purity suitable for medical use, the amount of helium injected around the flexible bag2could possibly be added using a different kind of source, possibly using a gas mixture or helium without same level of purity.

The test method is appropriate for detecting a leak of micrometric and submicrometric size, even for high capacity bags2. The enclosure10may be suitable to receive a bag having a capacity of at least 2 L, and possibly close to 500 or 650 L. In some embodiment the bag2has a capacity comprised between 20 and 50 L. In such cases, a single outer wall W may be provided to delimit the internal space SP that can be filled with the biopharmaceutical fluid.

Of course, the invention is not limited to the embodiments described above and provided only as examples. It encompasses the various modifications, alternative forms, and other variants conceivable to a skilled person within the context of the invention, and in particular any combinations of the various modes of operation described above, which may be taken separately or in combination.

In particular, a flexible bag2may comprise more than four plastic sheets for containing the biopharmaceutical fluid, possibly with each additional sheet increasing the integrity of the bag2to prevent any contamination of the biopharmaceutical fluid it contains.