Method of analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems

The present invention relates to a method of analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems, including receiving, by an interference analysis unit, interference parameters from a parameter input unit; receiving, by the interference analysis unit, polarized information from a polarized information input unit and calculating a Polarized Mismatch Loss Factor (PMLF) between a transmission antenna of an interference transmitter and a reception antenna of a victim receiver; and analyzing, by the interference analysis unit, an interference influence of the interference transmitter on the victim receiver based on the interference parameters and the PMLF. In accordance with the present invention, an interference influence between heterogeneous wireless communication systems using different polarized waves can be precisely analyzed by incorporating a loss characteristic according to a polarized mismatch between transmission and reception antennas into the interference influence.

CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C 119(a) to Korean Application No. 10-2012-0027982, filed on Mar. 19, 2012, in the Korean Intellectual Property Office, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety set forth in full.

BACKGROUND

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention relate to a method of analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems, and more particularly, to a method of analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems, which analyzes an interference influence between the heterogeneous wireless communication systems by incorporating a loss characteristic according to a polarized mismatch between transmission and reception antennas into the interference influence.

Methods chiefly used to analyze interference between wireless communication systems include a Minimum Coupling Loss (MCL) method and a Monte-Carlo method.

First, in the MCL method, the degree of isolation necessary for a plurality of wireless communication systems to be operated without mutual interference, and an isolation distance and an isolation frequency based on the degree of isolation are calculated using system parameters and a propagation model.

Interference between the wireless communication systems may be prevented by isolating the distances or frequencies between a victim receiver and an interference transmitter form each other based on the calculated isolation distance and isolation frequency.

In contrast, the Monte-Carlo method is a method of setting all parameter values related to an interference environment and then statistically calculating an interference probability. The Monte-Carlo method is a little great in complexity and different in a calculated interference probability according to an input parameter value, but is advantageous in that an interference probability into which a real environment has been incorporated may be calculated and all interference environments may be simulated.

In accordance with the MCL method and the Monte-Carlo method, however, it is difficult to precisely analyze an interference influence between wireless communication systems using different polarized waves.

A pertinent prior art includes Korean Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 10-2010-0053640 (May 20, 2010) entitled ‘Adaptation of Transmit Power Based on Maximum Received Signal Strength’.

SUMMARY

An embodiment of the present invention relates to a method of analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems, which is capable of precisely analyzing an interference influence between wireless communication systems using different polarized waves when the wireless communication systems use neighboring frequencies.

In an embodiment, a method of analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems includes receiving, by an interference analysis unit, interference parameters from a parameter input unit; receiving, by the interference analysis unit, polarized information from a polarized information input unit and calculating a Polarized Mismatch Loss Factor (PMLF) between a transmission antenna of an interference transmitter and a reception antenna of a victim receiver; and analyzing, by the interference analysis unit, an interference influence of the interference transmitter on the victim receiver based on the interference parameters and the PMLF.

In the calculating of the PMLF of the present invention, the interference analysis unit calculates the PMLF based on an isolation angle between the transmission antenna and the reception antenna.

In the present invention, the PMLF is calculated according to Equation 1 below.
PMLF(dB)=20 log(cos θ)  (Equation 1)

wherein θ is the isolation angle between the transmission antenna and the reception antenna.

In the calculating of the polarized mismatch loss of the present invention, the polarized information is polarized pattern information about the transmission antenna and the reception antenna.

In the present invention, analyzing the interference influence includes calculating, by the interference analysis unit, the intensity of an interference signal, radiated from the interference transmitter and received by the victim receiver, based on the interference parameters and the PMLF and calculating, by the interference analysis unit, calculating a degree of isolation based on the intensity of the interference signal.

The method of the present invention further includes calculating, by the interference analysis unit, a target isolation distance and a target isolation frequency between the interference transmitter and the victim receiver based on the degree of isolation.

In the calculating of the intensity of the interference signal of the present invention, the interference analysis unit calculates the intensity of the interference signal based on one or more of transmit power of the interference transmitter, gains of the transmission antenna and the reception antenna, and an isolation distance and an isolation frequency between the interference transmitter and the victim receiver.

In the present invention, analyzing the interference influence includes calculating, by the interference analysis unit, the intensity of a normal signal, radiated from a target transmitter and received by the victim receiver, based on the interference parameters and the PMLF; calculating, by the interference analysis unit, the intensity of a interference signal, radiated from the interference transmitter and received by the victim receiver, based on the interference parameters and the PMLF; and calculating, by the interference analysis unit, an interference probability based on the intensity of the normal signal and the intensity of the interference signal.

The interference parameters of the present invention include information having a form of a statistically calculated distribution value.

In the calculating of the intensity of the normal signal of the present invention, the interference analysis unit calculates the intensity of the normal signal based on one or more of transmit power of the target transmitter, a gain of a transmission antenna of the target transmitter, a gain of the reception antenna of the victim receiver, and a path loss between the target transmitter and the victim receiver.

In the calculating of the intensity of the interference signal of the present invention, the intensity of the interference signal is calculated by applying a blocking interference method.

In the calculating of the intensity of the interference signal of the present invention, the intensity of the interference signal is calculated by applying an unwanted radiation interference method.

In the calculating of the intensity of the interference signal of the present invention, the intensity of the interference signal is calculated by applying an inter-modulation interference method.

In the calculating of the interference probability of the present invention, the interference analysis unit calculates a probability that a value obtained by dividing the intensity of the normal signal by the intensity of the interference signal is a preset reference value or lower, as the interference probability.

DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to accompanying drawings. However, the embodiments are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

FIG. 1is a diagram illustrating a condition in which interference is generated between common wireless communication systems, andFIG. 2is a diagram illustrating a polarized mismatch loss between a transmission antenna and a reception antenna.

Referring toFIG. 1, a system subject to interference10, that is, the subject of interference analysis includes a victim receiver11and a target transmitter12. An interfering system20that generates interference affecting the system subject to interference10includes an interference transmitter21and a target receiver22.

That is, the victim receiver11and the target transmitter12form one wireless communication system, and the interference transmitter21and the target receiver22form the other wireless communication system.

Accordingly, the victim receiver11receives a signal from the target transmitter12, and the interference transmitter21sends a signal to the target receiver22.

Here, the signal radiated from the interference transmitter21may be transferred to the victim receiver11forming the other wireless communication system, other than the target receiver22, with the result that an interference phenomenon may be generated.

That is, the victim receiver11may receive an interference signal from the interference transmitter21forming the other wireless communication system, together with a normal signal received from the target transmitter12.

In this case, the intensity of the interference signal that is radiated from the interference transmitter21and then received by the victim receiver11may be determined based on an antenna gain of the interference transmitter21, an antenna gain of the victim receiver11, the distance between the interference transmitter21and the victim receiver11, and a difference in transmission and reception frequencies.

Furthermore, as shown inFIG. 2, if the antennas of the interference transmitter21and the victim receiver11use different polarized patterns A and B, a loss due to a polarized mismatch between the polarized patterns A and B also has an effect on the intensity of the interference signal.

Accordingly, the present invention is intended to propose a method of precisely analyzing an interference influence between heterogeneous wireless communication systems by incorporating a loss characteristic according to a polarized mismatch between a transmission antenna of the interference transmitter21, generating interference, and a reception antenna of the victim receiver11, subject to the interference, into the interference influence.

FIG. 3is a block diagram of an apparatus for performing a method of analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As shown inFIG. 3, the apparatus for performing the method of analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems according to the embodiment of the present invention includes a polarized information input unit30, a parameter input unit40, an interference analysis unit50, and an output unit60.

The polarized information input unit30receives polarized information about the transmission antenna of the interference transmitter21and the reception antenna of the victim receiver11and provides the polarized information to the interference analysis unit50.

Here, the polarized information input unit30may receive an isolation angle between the transmission antenna of the interference transmitter21and the reception antenna of the victim receiver11as the polarized information and receive polarized pattern information about the interference transmitter21and the victim receiver11as the polarized information.

The parameter input unit40receives interference parameters necessary to analyze interference between the system subject to interference10and the interfering system20and provides the interference parameters to the interference analysis unit50.

The interference parameters may include a variety of values necessary to analyze interference, such as the transmit power of a transmitter included in each of the system subject to interference10and the interfering system20, the antenna gains of a transmitter and receiver included therein, and an isolation distance and isolation frequency between the transmitter and the receiver included therein. Proper values may be selected according to an interference analysis method which is performed in the interference analysis unit50.

The interference analysis unit50calculates a Polarized Mismatch Loss Factor (PMLF) based on the polarized information provided by the polarized information input unit30and analyzes the interference influence of the interference transmitter21on the victim receiver11based on the calculated PMLF and the interference parameters provided by the parameter input unit40.

That is, the interference analysis unit50analyzes the interference influence of the interfering system20on the system subject to interference10by incorporating a loss characteristic according to a polarized mismatch between the system subject to interference10and the interfering system20into the interference influence.

Here, the interference analysis unit50may calculate a target isolation distance and a target isolation frequency between the victim receiver11and the interference transmitter21which may prevent interference or calculate an interference probability between the victim receiver11and the interference transmitter21by using the interference parameters and the PMLF. A detailed method in which the interference analysis unit50analyzes an interference influence is described later.

The output unit60outputs an analysis of the interference calculated by the interference analysis unit50, and the operation of the output unit60is controlled by the interference analysis unit50.

The output unit60may include a display panel (not shown) and display the analysis of the interference on a screen or may include a speaker (not shown) and output the analysis of the interference in the form of voice.

FIG. 4is a flowchart illustrating an operation of a method of analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems according to an embodiment of the present invention. A method of analyzing an interference influence by incorporating a loss characteristic according to a polarized mismatch into the MCL method is described in detail below with reference to FIG.4.

First, the interference analysis unit50receives interference parameters necessary to analyze interference from the parameter input unit40at step S100.

Next, the interference analysis unit50receives polarized information about the transmission antenna of the interference transmitter21and the reception antenna of the victim receiver11from the polarized information input unit30and calculates a PMLF between the transmission antenna and the reception antenna at step S110.

Here, the interference analysis unit50may calculate the PMLF as in Equation 1 below on the basis of an isolation angle between the transmission antenna of the interference transmitter21and the reception antenna of the victim receiver11.
PMLF(dB)=20 log(cos θ)  [Equation 1]

In Equation 1, the PMLF indicates a loss factor according to a polarized mismatch between the transmission antenna and the reception antenna, and A indicates the isolation angle between the transmission antenna and the reception antenna.

Next, the interference analysis unit50calculates the intensity of an interference signal, radiated from the interference transmitter21and then received by the victim receiver11, on the basis of the PMLF and the interference parameters received from the parameter input unit40at step S120.

Here, the interference analysis unit50may calculate the intensity of the interference signal as in Equation 2 below.
Icalculated=Pt+Gt+Gr−Lb(d)−FDR(Δf)+PMLF  [Equation 2]

Here, Ptindicates the transmit power of the interference transmitter21, Gtindicates the antenna gain of the interference transmitter21, Grindicates the antenna gain of the victim receiver11, Lb(d) indicates a transmission loss according to an isolation distance between the interference transmitter21and the victim receiver11, and FDR(Δf) indicates the amount of attenuation according to frequency isolation between the interference transmitter21and the victim receiver11.

Next, the interference analysis unit50calculates the degree of isolation by comparing the calculated intensity of the interference signal with a preset acceptable interference value as in Equation 3 at step S130.

Here, the acceptable interference value refers to the intensity of the interference signal which is acceptable to the victim receiver11, and it may be selected in various ways according to an intention of a designer and parameters regarding the victim receiver11and the target transmitter12.
Isolation(dB)=Iacceptable−Icalculated[Equation 3]

In Equation 3, Iacceptableindicates the acceptable interference value, and Icalculatedindicates the intensity of the interference signal which is radiated from the interference transmitter21and then received by the victim receiver11.

Next, the interference analysis unit50calculates a target isolation distance and a target isolation frequency on the basis of the calculated degree of isolation at step S140.

Here, the target isolation distance and the target isolation frequency refer to an isolation distance and an isolation frequency between the interference transmitter11and the victim receiver21which may prevent problems due to interference from occurring. The target isolation distance and the target isolation frequency may be calculated by applying a proper propagation model to the calculated degree of isolation.

Finally, the interference analysis unit50may control the output unit60so that an analysis of the interference is outputted at step S150. More particularly, the interference analysis unit50may control the output unit60so that at least one piece of information, from among pieces of information about the degree of isolation, the target isolation distance, and the target isolation frequency, is displayed on a screen or outputted in the form of voice.

FIG. 5is a flowchart illustrating an operation of a method of analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems according to another embodiment of the present invention. A method of analyzing an interference influence by incorporating a loss characteristic according to a polarized mismatch into the Monte-Carlo method is described in detail below with reference toFIG. 5.

First, the interference analysis unit50receives interference parameters necessary to analyze interference from the parameter input unit40at step S200. Here, the interference parameters may include information having a form of a statistically calculated distribution value.

Next, the interference analysis unit50receives polarized information about the transmission antenna of the interference transmitter21and the reception antenna of the victim receiver11from the polarized information input unit30and calculates a PMLF between the transmission antenna and the reception antenna at step S210.

Here, the interference analysis unit50may calculate the PMLF as in Equation 1 on the basis of an isolation angle between the transmission antenna of the interference transmitter21and the reception antenna of the victim receiver11. The calculation of the PMLF is the same as that described in connection with the previous embodiment, and a detailed description thereof is omitted.

Next, the interference analysis unit50calculates the intensity of a normal signal which is radiated from the target transmitter12and then received by the victim receiver11on the basis of the PMLF and the interference parameters received from the parameter input unit40at step S220.

If the intensity of the normal signal radiated from the target transmitter12and then received by the victim receiver11is defined as a Desired Receiving Signal Strength (DRSS), the DRSS may be calculated according to Equation 4 below.
DRSS=Pwtsupplied±gwt→vr−plwt→vr(fvr)+gvr→wt+PMLF  [Equation 4]

In Equation 4, Pwtsuppliedindicates power supplied to the target transmitter12, gwt→vrindicates an antenna gain directing from the target transmitter12to the victim receiver11, gvr→wtindicates an antenna gain directing from the victim receiver11to the target transmitter12, and plwt→vr(fvr) indicates a path loss between the target transmitter12and the victim receiver11.

Next, the interference analysis unit50calculates the intensity of an interference signal which is radiated from the interference transmitter21and then received by the victim receiver11on the basis of the calculated PMLF and the interference parameters received from the parameter input unit40at step S230.

Here, the intensity of the interference signal radiated from the interference transmitter21and received by the victim receiver11may be defined as an Interfering Receiving Signal Strength (IRSS).

Here, interference methods in which interference is performed may chiefly include blocking, unwanted radiation, inter-modulation. IRSSs according to the respective interference methods may be calculated as in Equations 5 to 7 below.
IRSSblock,i=pitsupplied+gitPC+git→vr−plit→vr(fvr)−avr+gvr→it+PMLF[Equation 5]

Here, IRSSblock,iindicates the intensity of a blocking interference signal which is transmitted by an ithinterference transmitter21and received by the victim receiver11, pitsuppliedindicates power supplied to the interference transmitter21, gitPCindicates a power control gain for the interference transmitter21in a power control function, git→vrindicates an antenna gain directing from the interference transmitter21to the victim receiver11, gvr→itindicates an antenna gain directing from the victim receiver11to the interference transmitter21, avrindicates blocking attenuation of the victim receiver11, and plit→vrindicates a path loss between the interference transmitter21and the victim receiver11.
IRSSunwanted,i=emissionit(fit,fvr)+git→vr=plit→vr(fvr)+gvr→it+PMLF  [Equation 6]

In Equation 6, IRSSunwanted,iindicates the intensity of an interference signal received by the victim receiver11owing to unwanted radiation of an ithinterference transmitter21, and emissionit(fit, fvr) indicates the intensity of an interference signal received in the reception bandwidth of the victim receiver11. In general, the emissionit(fit, fvr) may be calculated by using functions, such as a known unwanted radiation mask and the intensity of transmit power of the interference transmitter21.
Ii,jRSSintermod=2*IiRSSint+IjRSSint−3*intermod−3sensvr−9(dB)+PMLF  [Equation 7]

In Equation 7, Ii,jRSSintermodindicates the intensity of an inter-modulation interference signal received from an interference transmitter21and a jthinterference transmitter21, intermod indicates third inter-modulation attenuation, and sensvrindicates the sensitivity of the victim receiver11.

Next, the interference analysis unit50calculates an interference probability by comparing a value, obtained by dividing DRSS by the IRSS, with a preset reference value (Carrier-to-Interface (C/I)) as in Equation 8 at step S240.

That is, the interference analysis unit50may calculate a probability in which the DRSS/IRSS will become the reference value (C/I) or less as an interference probability on condition that the DRSS is received in a reference reception sensitivity (sens) or higher.

Finally, the interference analysis unit50may control the output unit60so that an analysis of the interference is outputted at step S250. More particularly, the interference analysis unit50may control the output unit60so that the calculated interference probability is displayed on a screen or outputted in the form of voice.

As described above, in accordance with the method of analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems according to the present invention, an interference influence between heterogeneous wireless communication systems using different polarized waves can be precisely analyzed by incorporating a loss characteristic according to a polarized mismatch between transmission and reception antennas into the interference influence.

Furthermore, in accordance with the present invention, wireless communication service with high quality can be provided because guard band and technological conditions capable of minimizing interference by precisely analyzing an interference influence between heterogeneous wireless communication systems can be proposed.

Meanwhile, in the present embodiment, an example in which each of the system subject to interference10and the interfering system20includes a pair of the transmitter and receiver has been illustrated, but the present invention is not limited thereto. The present invention may also be likewise applied to an example in which each wireless communication system includes a plurality of transceivers.

That is, a specific victim receiver11may receive a plurality of interference signals from a plurality of the interference transmitters21, and in this case, the interference analysis methods according to the present invention may also be likewise applied.

Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the methods of incorporating a loss characteristic according to a polarized mismatch into the MCL method and the Monte-Carlo method have been described, but the loss characteristic according to a polarized mismatch may be also applied to various other interference analysis methods.

Furthermore, when analyzing interference between heterogeneous wireless communication systems, an interference influence between heterogeneous wireless communication systems using different polarized waves can be precisely analyzed by incorporating a loss characteristic according to a polarized mismatch between transmission and reception antennas into the interference influence.