Method and apparatus for providing internetworking service reliability

A method and apparatus include processing for providing reliable internetworking services that begins by determining whether identified internetworking resources and identified intranetworking resources provide a reliable intranetworking service. For example, the internetworking service may be a communication, data transfer, file share, etc., between two or more users affiliated with different networks. The identified intranetworking resources are those links within each network to support the communication (i.e., the internetworking service) and the identified internetworking resources are those that couple the networks. The processing continues by determining whether the reliable internetworking service cannot be provided due to a failure of one of the identified intranetworking resource. When this occurs, the identified internetworking resources that are associated with the failed intranetworking resource are flagged. Having flagged the associated internetworking resources, a new internetworking service is established using newly identified intranetworking resources and newly identified internetworking resources. Such newly identified intranetworking resources and internetworking resources are exclusive of the flagged internetworking resources when possible.

TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to communications networks and more particularly to providing reliable internetworking communications.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Communication networks are known to include a plurality of switches that are interoperably coupled to support communications between users coupled to ports of the communication network. The users may be end-users such as personal computers, telephones, videophones, etc., or may be servers, routers, private branch exchange (PBX), etc. Such users communicate in various forms such as voice, data, or a combination thereof via communication paths supported by the communication networks. The communication paths may be established using dedicated links or allocating links upon receipt of communication requests.

Many communication networks include a network service controller such as the network service controller 46020 manufactured and distributed by Newbridge Networks Corporation. The network service controller (NSC) manages the communication network by establishing the dedicated communication links, performing diagnostics on switches and/or links within the network, and configuring the switches and/or links.

To expand coverage area of a communication network, several communication networks may be linked together. To support such linking, each communication network includes a plurality of network-to-network interfaces (NNI) and a plurality of user-to-network interface (UNI). As the names imply, the UNI allows a user to interface with the network(s) while the NNI provides coupling, on a one-to-one or a one-to-many basis, between networks. To further support the linking of multiple communication networks, a Multi-Network Service Controller (MNSC), such as the 48020 manufactured and distributed by Newbridge Networks Corporation, is included. The MNSC manages the resources of the outer edges of the network (i.e., the UNIs and NNIs). As part of the MNSC's management function, it establishes communication links between UNIs based on user request to form a communication path, which may be comprised of dedicated communication links (i.e., links that are permanently assigned) or allocated communication links (i.e., links that are assigned when needed). In either case, the MNSC manages the internetworking links (i.e., the links coupling the networks) and requests of the NSC to establish intranetworking links (i.e., the links within a network). At this point, the NSC establishes the intranetworking links to complete the communication path between the endpoint users.

An issue arises when an NSC is unable to establish an intranetworking communication link, or when an intranetworking link (i.e., resource) fails. Such failure may occur due to all resources being used, not having sufficient bandwidth to support the current request, the intranetworking communication resources are broken, etc. When an intranetworking resource fails, the NNSC is unaware of the type of failure, thus, to the MNSC, the communication path has failed and has no way to correct the failure. Only the NSC of the network containing the failed intranetworking resource(s) is aware of the type of failure and is the only entity capable of fixing the failure. As such, the NSC attempts to reestablish reliable intranetworking paths while the MNSC remains idle for this communication. Depending on the type of failure, it may take several hours to repair the intranetworking resource(s).

Therefore, a need exists for a method and apparatus for a Multi-Network Service Controller to provide reliable internetworking services when an intranetworking resource fails.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Generally, the present invention provides a method and apparatus that includes processing for providing reliable internetworking services. Such processing begins by determining whether identified internetworking resources and identified intranetworking resources provide a reliable intranetworking service. For example, the internetworking service may be a communication, data transfer, file share, etc., between two or more users affiliated with different networks. The identified intranetworking resources are those links within each network to support the communication (i.e., the internetworking service) and the identified internetworking resources are those that couple the networks. The processing continues by determining whether the reliable internetworking service cannot be provided due to a failure of one of the identified intranetworking resource. When this occurs, the identified internetworking resources that are associated with the failed intranetworking resource are flagged. Having flagged the associated internetworking resources, a new internetworking service is established using newly identified intranetworking resources and newly identified internetworking resources. Such newly identified intranetworking resources and internetworking resources are exclusive of the flagged internetworking resources, when possible. For example, the newly internetworking service may be a communication path that is established using different intranetworking resources (i.e., different links within the network) and different internetworking resources than in the failed communication path. With such a method and apparatus, reliable internetworking services can be provided by a multi-network service controller when communication links (i.e., intranetworking resources) within a network fail.

The present invention can be more fully described with reference to FIGS. 1-7 . FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic block diagram of a plurality of networks 20 - 26 operably coupled to a multi-network service controller 10 and a plurality of network service controllers 12 - 18 . Each of the networks 20 - 26 include a plurality of switches 36 , 40 , 46 , and 48 that are interoperably coupled to provide communication links between the switches and network ports, such as user-to-network interface ports 74 , 54 , 62 , and 66 and network-to-network interface ports 52 , 56 , 58 , 60 , 64 , 68 , 70 , and 72 . The coupling between each switch is referred to as an intranetworking resource 38 , 42 , 44 , and 50 , or as a communication link. Such switches may be the 36120 manufactured and distributed by Newbridge Networks, which supports frame relay communications, or the 36170 which supports frame relay to ATM communications. As one of average skill in the art will appreciate, other types of transport protocols may be used.

Network service controller (NSC) 12 is operably coupled to network 24 and to the multi-network service controller 10 . The network service controller 12 may be a 46020 network service controller as manufactured and distributed by Newbridge Networks, which includes functionality that is in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. As shown, NSC 12 manages the intranetworking resources 50 of network 24 . Similarly, NSC 14 manages the intranetworking resources 44 of network 22 , while NCS 18 manages the intranetworking resource 42 of network 20 , and NCS 16 manages the intranetworking resources 38 of network 26 .

The multi-network service controller (MNSC) 10 is operably coupled to each of the network service controllers 12 - 18 . The MNSC 10 may be the 48020 as manufactured and distributed by Newbridge Networks, which includes functionality that is in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. In general, the MNSC 10 manages the internetworking resources 28 , 30 , 32 , and 34 . Such internetworking resources couple the networks together via the network-to-network interface ports 52 , 56 , 68 , 60 , 64 , 68 , 70 , and 72 . In addition, the MNSC also manages the user-to-network interfaces 54 , 62 , 66 , and 74 . As such, when a user requests that a communication path be established between multiple networks, the MNSC allocates the particular UNIs and NNIs to establish the internetworking service. The associated NSCs 12 - 18 of the networks 20 - 26 involved in establishing and supporting the internetworking service (e.g., a communication) manage the intranetworking resources of their respective networks.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of an initial establishment of a communication service as represented by the heavy dotted line between UNI 74 of network 26 to UNI 62 of network 22 . Such a connection represents the initial internetworking service, which may be established in a variety of ways. For example, the service may be established via a dedicated communication path (i.e., private virtual circuit), established via a communication path for a particular request, established via a communication path for network overhead data transportation or for another type of data transportation, and/or for any other type of service supported by the networks singly or in combination.

As shown, the initial internetworking service is via two switches within network 26 and is coupled to network 20 via the NNI 70 and NNI 52 . Network 22 is coupled to network 20 via NNI 56 and 58 . As previously mentioned, the NSCs are responsible for establishing the intranetworking resources (i.e., allocation of switches and/or links supported by these switches). In this example, a link within network 20 fails, causing the internetworking service to become unreliable. In this instance, the MNSC 10 flags internetworking resources 32 and 34 as being coupled to the intranetworking resource that has failed. Having flagged the failed internetworking resources, the MNSC attempts to establish a new internetworking service (e.g., a new communication path) between the users without using the flagged internetworking resources, if possible. Note that the flagging of internetworking resources is done on a service-by-service basis. For example, if another call were to be established via different users that utilize UNI 74 and UNI 62 , the internetworking resources 34 and 32 would not be initially flagged for the establishment of the new call.

In this example, the newly established internetworking service is illustrated by the solid heavy line between UNI 74 of network 26 and UNI 62 of network 22 . As shown, network 26 is operably coupled now to network 24 via internetworking resource 30 . Network 24 is coupled to network 22 via new internetworking resource 28 . The establishment of the intranetworking resources (i.e., the allocation of communication links with the networks) is performed by the associated NSCs.

FIG. 3 illustrates the plurality of communication networks 20 - 26 , the plurality of network service controllers 12 - 18 , operably coupled to a plurality of multi-network service controllers 10 and 80 . In the embodiment of FIG. 3 , the multiple MNSCs 10 and 80 each control portions of each of the networks that support their clientele. For example, one MNSC may be owned and operated by one telephone company while the other may be owned and operated by a different telephone company. The telephone companies share the resources of networks 20 - 26 to reduce the cost of communications.

FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic block diagram of a plurality of network 82 - 84 , operably coupled to associated NSCs 12 , 14 , 18 and operably coupled to MNSC 10 . As shown, each of the networks 82 - 86 includes a plurality of sub-networks 82 - 1 through 82 - 4 , 84 - 1 through 84 - 4 , and 86 - 1 through 86 - 4 that are logically coupled via logical connections 89 . Accordingly, the networks are not physically divided in subnetworks, but logically to provide finer granularity when re-routing services. In this embodiment, the multi-network service controller is provided with information regarding the sub-networks, such that the MNSC may establish internetworking services by defining sub-network resources to be utilized. The sub-network resources are internally controlled by the associated network service controller 12 , 14 , 18 .

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of the MNSC providing reliable internetworking services within networks that include a plurality of sub-networks. In this illustration, the initial internetworking service is illustrated by the heavy dashed line between UNI 94 of network 82 and UNI 100 of network 84 . In this illustration, a failure occurred within sub-network 84 - 1 . Accordingly, the MNSC flags the logical connections of sub-network 84 - 1 . As such, the logical connection of the sub-network 84 - 1 to NNI 96 is flagged, as is the logical connection to subnetworks 84 - 2 , 84 - 3 and 84 - 4 . Having flagged these links (i.e., intranetworking resources), the MNSC establishes a new communication path as illustrated by the solid heavy line. The internetworking resources and intranetworking resources of the newly established internetworking service are not flagged for this particular call. By comparing the illustration of the FIG. 5 with that of FIG. 2 , the dividing of networks into sub-networks, provides the MNSC with greater flexibility in establishing new internetworking services. As in the example of FIG. 2 , when an intranetworking resource failed within the network, the network was typically unavailable for the newly established internetworking service. In contrast, by subdividing the network, network 84 is still available for supporting the newly established internetworking service, but using different sub-network portions.

When the MNSC is establishing the new internetworking service, it follows several guidelines when working with sub-network internetworking resources. The guidelines include maintaining a list of flagged internetworking resources for each internetworking service (e.g., a call) which is segment rerouted. A link (i.e., an internetworking resource) is added to the list if it is full, is fractional, or is a logic link on the MNSC level and is adjacent to a device containing the end point of a failed segment. For example, if a DS 0 is a segment endpoint, the full and all the fractional links originating on the parent DS 1 device will be flagged. If a DS 0 is a frame relay segment endpoint, all the frame relay links passing through the parent DS 1 device will be flagged. Note that marking of the links influences the routing only of the service (e.g., call) on whose list they are maintained and not the routing of any other service. The MNSC deletes the flag list for a service when the service becomes connected or when a certain number of segment reroute attempts have passed.

When a service has both endpoints within the same sub-network, the service cannot be segment rerouted unless the new route goes out via an NNI and into the sub-network over some internetworking links. For example, if both endpoints were contained within sub-network 82 - 2 , and a failure occurred within the sub-network, the segment rerouting would require internetworking resources to be incorporated. For example, in FIG. 5 the internetworking resource coupled between NNI 90 and NNI 96 of network 84 would need to be utilized. Intranetworking resources of sub-network 84 - 1 , - 2 , - 3 and/or - 4 would need to be allocated and internetworking resource between NNI 98 of network 84 and NNI 102 of network 86 would be allocated. Additionally, internetworking resources of sub-network 86 - 1 , - 2 , - 3 , and/or - 4 would need to be allocated such that the internetworking resource between NNI 92 of network 82 and NNI 104 of network 86 completes the coupling to network 82 . Having completed the internetworking coupling, additional intranetworking resources of network 82 would need to be established to perform the segment rerouting.

As one of average skill in the art will appreciate, a new internetworking service can be established without the use of flagged links in many ways. As further example, when a service spans a single network and reliability of the service becomes an issue, the service may be re-routed outside that network onto the backbone of the network. Other re-routing options may readily be derived from the examples presented and such other re-routing options are far too numerous to individually mention.

FIG. 6 illustrates a logic diagram of the method for providing reliable internetworking services. The process begins at step 120 where a determination is made as to whether identified intranetworking resources and identified internetworking resources provide a reliable internetworking service. The identified intranetworking resources and internetworking resources may be identified when a service request is received to establish the reliable internetworking service (i.e., establish a logical communication path via simulation prior to allocation) or when the reliable internetworking service is established (i.e., test after allocation of resources). The determination that an intranetworking resource has failed may be received from a network resource manager, i.e., an NSC, affiliated with the unreliable intranetworking resource.

The process then proceeds to step 122 where a determination is made as to whether a reliable internetworking service cannot be provided due to one of the identified intranetworking resources. If the internetworking service can be provided, the process repeats at step 120 . If, however, the internetworking service cannot reliably be provided, the process proceeds to step 124 . At step 124 , at least one of the identified internetworking resources that are associated with the failed intranetworking resources is flagged. An identified internetworking resource is associated with the failed, or unreliable, intranetworking resource by being adjacent thereto. This was illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 5 .

The process then proceeds to step 126 where a determination is made as to whether a new internetworking service can be established without using flagged internetworking resources. If so, the process proceeds to step 130 where the new internetworking service is provided with the newly identified internetworking and intranetworking resources. The process then proceeds to step 132 where a terminate service request is provided to the NSC to terminate the initial internetworking service. Such a termination request instructs the NSC to de-allocate the initially identified intranetworking resources that were supporting the internetworking service.

If, however, the new internetworking service cannot be established without using flagged internetworking resources, the process proceeds to step 128 . At step 128 , the new internetworking service is established using a minimum number of flagged internetworking resources. As one of average skill in the art will appreciate, the processing steps 120 through 132 may be done on a service-by-service basis and are executed by the MNSC, which may be a personal computer, work station, or includes processing circuitry and memory to store and execute programming instructions according to the logical steps of FIG. 6 .

Steps 134 through 144 illustrate the determination process of establishing the new internetworking service. At step 134 , a potential internetworking service (e.g., a potential communication path between endpoints) is identified that includes intranetworking resources and non-flagged internetworking resources. The process then proceeds to step 136 where the determination is made as to whether the potential internetworking service can support the new internetworking service. If so, the internetworking resources and the intranetworking resources are allocated at step 138 .

If, however, the internetworking resources of the potential internetworking service cannot support the new internetworking service, the process proceeds to step 140 . At step 140 , the internetworking resources that are unable to support the new internetworking service are flagged. The process then proceeds to step 142 where a determination is made as to whether all potential internetworking services have been exhausted. If not, the process repeats at step 134 . If, however, the potential internetworking services have been exhausted, the process proceeds to step 144 . At step 144 , the flagged internetworking resources are cleared and the process repeats at step 134 . Alternatively, the originally allocated internetworking resources and intranetworking resources may be maintained and the service queued until such resource become available.

FIG. 7 illustrates a logic diagram of an alternate method for providing reliable internetworking services. The process begins at step 150 where a determination is made as to whether intranetworking resources provide a reliable networking service. Note that the intranetworking resources may include a plurality of logical sub-internetworking resources, as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 . The determination that an intranetworking resource is unavailable may be determined based on lack or available bandwidth, cost of links, failed links, excessive link delays, etc.

If the intranetworking resources provide a reliable internetworking service, the process proceeds to step 152 where the internetworking service is established using the intranetworking resources. If not, the process proceeds to step 154 where an internetworking service is established using at least one intranetworking resource and at least one internetworking resource such that the internetworking resource is established without using the intranetworking resource that would not provide a reliable service. This was discussed with reference to FIG. 5 and is further illustrated with respect to steps 134 through 144 of FIG. 6 . The process then proceeds to step 156 where notice is provided of the internetworking service to a network resource manager associated with the intranetworking resource.

The preceding discussion has presented a method and apparatus for providing reliable internetworking services. Such services include dedicated communication paths, diagnostics, per-call requests, and/or any other service supported by a communication network. By allowing the MNSC to reallocate internetworking resources for a particular service, substantial improvement in service quality may be obtained in comparison to past embodiments where it was entirely up to the individual NSC to repair unreliable intranetworking resources. As one of average skill in the art will readily appreciate, other embodiments of the present invention may be readily derived from the teachings contained herein without deviating from the scope of the claims.