Orthopaedic femoral component having controlled condylar curvature

An orthopaedic knee prosthesis includes a femoral component having a condyle surface. The condyle surface is defined by one or more radii of curvatures, which are controlled to reduce or delay the onset of anterior translation of the femoral component relative to a tibial bearing.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED U.S. PATENT APPLICATION

Cross-reference is made to U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/165,574 entitled “Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Orthopaedic Knee Prosthesis Having Controlled Condylar Curvature” by Christel M. Wagner, which was filed on Jun. 30, 2008; to U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/165,575 entitled “Posterior Stabilized Orthopaedic Knee Prosthesis Having Controlled Condylar Curvature” by Joseph G. Wyss, which was filed on Jun. 30, 2008; and to U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/165,582 entitled “Posterior Stabilized Orthopaedic Prosthesis” by Joseph G. Wyss, which was filed on Jun. 30, 2008; and to U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/488,107 entitled “Orthopaedic Knee Prosthesis Having Controlled Condylar Curvature” by Mark A. Heldreth, which was filed on Jun. 19, 2009; the entirety of each of which is incorporated herein by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to orthopaedic prostheses, and particularly to orthopaedic prostheses for use in knee replacement surgery.

BACKGROUND

Joint arthroplasty is a well-known surgical procedure by which a diseased and/or damaged natural joint is replaced by a prosthetic joint. A typical knee prosthesis includes a tibial tray, a femoral component, and a polymer insert or bearing positioned between the tibial tray and the femoral component. Depending on the severity of the damage to the patient's joint, orthopaedic prostheses of varying mobility may be used. For example, the knee prosthesis may include a “fixed” tibial bearing in cases wherein it is desirable to limit the movement of the knee prosthesis, such as when significant soft tissue damage or loss is present. Alternatively, the knee prosthesis may include a “mobile” tibial bearing in cases wherein a greater degree of freedom of movement is desired. Additionally, the knee prosthesis may be a total knee prosthesis designed to replace the femoral-tibial interface of both condyles of the patient's femur or a uni-compartmental (or uni-condylar) knee prosthesis designed to replace the femoral-tibial interface of a single condyle of the patient's femur.

The type of orthopedic knee prosthesis used to replace a patient's natural knee may also depend on whether the patient's posterior cruciate ligament is retained or sacrificed (i.e., removed) during surgery. For example, if the patient's posterior cruciate ligament is damaged, diseased, and/or otherwise removed during surgery, a posterior stabilized knee prosthesis may be used to provide additional support and/or control at later degrees of flexion. Alternatively, if the posterior cruciate ligament is intact, a cruciate retaining knee prosthesis may be used.

Typical orthopaedic knee prostheses are generally designed to duplicate the natural movement of the patient's joint. As the knee is flexed and extended, the femoral and tibial components articulate and undergo combinations of relative anterior-posterior motion and relative internal-external rotation. However, the patient's surrounding soft tissue also impacts the kinematics and stability of the orthopaedic knee prosthesis throughout the joint's range of motion. That is, forces exerted on the orthopaedic components by the patient's soft tissue may cause unwanted or undesirable motion of the orthopaedic knee prosthesis. For example, the orthopaedic knee prosthesis may exhibit an amount of unnatural (paradoxical) anterior translation as the femoral component is moved through the range of flexion.

In a typical orthopaedic knee prosthesis, paradoxical anterior translation may occur at nearly any degree of flexion, but particularly at mid to late degrees of flexion. Paradoxical anterior translation can be generally defined as an abnormal relative movement of a femoral component on a tibial bearing wherein the contact “point” between the femoral component and the tibial bearing “slides” anteriorly with respect to the tibial bearing. This paradoxical anterior translation may result in loss of joint stability, accelerated wear, abnormal knee kinematics, and/or cause the patient to experience a sensation of instability during some activities.

SUMMARY

According to one aspect, an orthopaedic knee prosthesis may include a femoral component and a tibial bearing. The femoral component may include a condyle surface that is curved in the sagittal plane. The tibial bearing may include a bearing surface configured to articulate with the condyle surface of the femoral component. In some embodiments, the condyle surface of the femoral component may contact the bearing surface at a first contact point on the condyle surface at a first degree of flexion equal to about 0 degrees. The condyle surface may also contact the bearing surface at a second contact point on the condyle surface at a second degree of flexion. The second degree of flexion may be greater than the first degree of flexion. For example, the second degree of flexion may be in the range of about 10 degrees to about 100 degrees. In one particular embodiment, the second degree of flexion is about 30 degrees.

The condyle surface in the sagittal plane may have a first radius of curvature at the first contact point and a second radius of curvature at the second contact point. The second radius of curvature may be greater than the first radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters. For example, the second radius may greater than the first radius by a distance of at least 2 millimeters or by at least 5 millimeters. in some embodiments, the ratio of the first radius of curvature to the second radius of curvature is in the range of 0.50 to 0.99. For example, the ratio of the first radius of curvature to the second radius of curvature may be in the range of 0.90 to 0.99.

Additionally, in some embodiments, the condyle surface may contact the bearing surface at a third contact point on the condyle surface at a third degree of flexion. The third degree of flexion may be greater than the second degree of flexion and less than about 90 degrees. The condyle surface in the sagittal plane may have a third radius of curvature at the third contact point. The third radius of curvature may be greater than the first radius of curvature and less than the second radius of curvature. For example, in some embodiments, the third radius is greater than the second radius by at least 0.5 millimeters. However, in other embodiments, the third radius of curvature may be greater than the first and second radii of curvature.

In some embodiments, the condyle surface of the femoral component is a medial condyle surface and the bearing surface of the tibial bearing is a medial bearing surface. The femoral component may include a lateral condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane. The tibial bearing may include a lateral bearing surface configured to articulate with the lateral condyle surface of the femoral component. In some embodiments, the lateral condyle surface and the medial condyle surface are substantially symmetrical in the sagittal plane. However, in other embodiments, the lateral condyle surface and the medial condyle surface are not substantially symmetrical in the sagittal plane.

Additionally, in some embodiments, the lateral condyle surface may contact the lateral bearing surface at a first point on the lateral condyle surface at a third degree of flexion. The third degree of flexion may be less than about 30 degrees. The lateral condyle surface may also contact the lateral bearing surface at a second point on the lateral condyle surface at a fourth degree of flexion. The fourth degree of flexion may be greater than the third degree of flexion. Additionally, the lateral condyle surface in the sagittal plane may include a first radius of curvature at the first contact point and a second radius of curvature at the second contact point. The second radius of curvature may be greater than the first radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters. In some embodiments, the second radius of curvature of the lateral condyle may be different from the second radius of curvature of the medial condyle. Additionally, in some embodiments, the second degree of flexion may be different from the fourth degree of flexion. Further, in some embodiments, the difference between the first radius of curvature and the second radius of curvature is different from the difference between the third radius of curvature and the fourth radius of curvature.

According to another aspect, and orthopaedic knee prosthesis may include a femoral component and a tibial bearing. The femoral component may include a condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane. The tibial bearing may include a bearing surface configured to articulate with the condyle surface of the femoral component. The condyle surface may contact the bearing surface at a first contact point on the condyle surface at a first degree of flexion. The first degree of flexion may be less than 30 degrees. The condyle surface may also contact the bearing surface at a second contact point on the condyle surface at a second degree of flexion. The second degree of flexion may be greater than about 30 degrees.

In such embodiments, the condyle surface in the sagittal plane has a first radius of curvature at the first contact point and a second radius of curvature at the second contact point. The ratio of the first radius of curvature to the second radius of curvature may be in the range of 0.80 to 0.99. For example, the ratio of the first radius of curvature to the second radius of curvature may be in the range of 0.90 to 0.99.

According to a further aspect, an orthopaedic knee prosthesis may include a femoral component and a tibial bearing. The femoral component may include a condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane. The tibial bearing may include a bearing surface configured to articulate with the condyle surface of the femoral component. The condyle surface may contact the bearing surface at a first contact point on the condyle surface at a first degree of flexion. The first degree of flexion may be, for example, about 0 degrees. The condyle surface may also contact the bearing surface at a second contact point on the condyle surface at a second degree of flexion. The second degree of flexion may be greater than about 50 degrees. For example, in some embodiments, the second degree of flexion may be greater than about 70 degrees.

In some embodiments, the condyle surface in the sagittal plane may include a curved surface section extending from the first contact point to the second contact point. The curved surface section may be defined by a substantially constant radius of curvature.

According to yet another aspect, an orthopaedic knee prosthesis may include a femoral component. The femoral component may include a condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane. The condyle surface may include an anterior surface and a posterior surface. The anterior surface and the posterior surface may meet at an inferior-most point on the condyle surface. The posterior surface may include a superior-most point and a mid-point located equidistance from the superior-most point and the inferior-most point. The posterior surface in the sagittal plane may have a first radius of curvature at a first point on the posterior surface between the inferior-most point and the mid-point. The posterior surface in the sagittal plane may have a second radius of curvature at a second point on the posterior surface between the first point and the superior-most point. The second radius of curvature may be greater than the first radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Terms representing anatomical references, such as anterior, posterior, medial, lateral, superior, inferior, etcetera, may be used throughout this disclosure in reference to both the orthopaedic implants described herein and a patient's natural anatomy. Such terms have well-understood meanings in both the study of anatomy and the field of orthopaedics. Use of such anatomical reference terms in the specification and claims is intended to be consistent with their well-understood meanings unless noted otherwise.

Referring now toFIG. 1, in one embodiment, an orthopaedic knee prosthesis10includes a femoral component12, a tibial bearing14, and a tibial tray16. The femoral component12and the tibial tray16are illustratively formed from a metallic material such as cobalt-chromium or titanium, but may be formed from other materials, such as a ceramic material, a polymer material, a bio-engineered material, or the like, in other embodiments. The tibial bearing14is illustratively formed from a polymer material such as a ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), but may be formed from other materials, such as a ceramic material, a metallic material, a bio-engineered material, or the like, in other embodiments.

As discussed in more detail below, the femoral component12is configured to articulate with the tibial bearing14, which is configured to be coupled with the tibial tray16. In the illustrative embodiment ofFIG. 1, the tibial bearing14is embodied as a rotating or mobile tibial bearing and is configured to rotate relative to the tibial tray12during use. However, in other embodiments, the tibial bearing14may be embodied as a fixed tibial bearing, which may be limited or restricted from rotating relative the tibial tray16.

The tibial tray16is configured to be secured to a surgically-prepared proximal end of a patient's tibia (not shown). The tibial tray16may be secured to the patient's tibia via use of bone adhesive or other attachment means. The tibial tray16includes a platform18having a top surface20and a bottom surface22. Illustratively, the top surface20is generally planar and, in some embodiments, may be highly polished. The tibial tray16also includes a stem24extending downwardly from the bottom surface22of the platform18. A cavity or bore26is defined in the top surface20of the platform18and extends downwardly into the stem24. The bore26is formed to receive a complimentary stem of the tibial insert14as discussed in more detail below.

As discussed above, the tibial bearing14is configured to be coupled with the tibial tray16. The tibial bearing14includes a platform30having an upper bearing surface32and a bottom surface34. In the illustrative embodiment wherein the tibial bearing14is embodied as a rotating or mobile tibial bearing, the bearing14includes a stem36extending downwardly from the bottom surface32of the platform30. When the tibial bearing14is coupled to the tibial tray16, the stem36is received in the bore26of the tibial tray16. In use, the tibial bearing14is configured to rotate about an axis defined by the stem36relative to the tibial tray16. In embodiments wherein the tibial bearing14is embodied as a fixed tibial bearing, the bearing14may or may not include the stem22and/or may include other devices or features to secure the tibial bearing14to the tibial tray12in a non-rotating configuration.

The upper bearing surface32of the tibial bearing14includes a medial bearing surface42and a lateral bearing surface44. The medial and lateral bearing surfaces42,44are configured to receive or otherwise contact corresponding medial and lateral condyles of the femoral component14as discussed in more detail below. As such, each of the bearing surface42,44has a concave contour.

The femoral component12is configured to be coupled to a surgically-prepared surface of the distal end of a patient's femur (not shown). The femoral component12may be secured to the patient's femur via use of bone adhesive or other attachment means. The femoral component12includes an outer, articulating surface50having a pair of medial and lateral condyles52,54. The condyles52,54are spaced apart to define an intracondyle opening56therebetween. In use, the condyles52,54replace the natural condyles of the patient's femur and are configured to articulate on the corresponding bearing surfaces42,44of the platform30of the tibial bearing14.

The illustrative orthopaedic knee prosthesis10ofFIG. 1is embodied as a posterior cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis. That is, the femoral component12is embodied as a posterior cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis and the tibial bearing14is embodied as a posterior cruciate-retaining tibial bearing14. However, in other embodiments, the orthopaedic knee prosthesis10may be embodied as a posterior cruciate-sacrificing knee prosthesis as illustrated inFIG. 2.

In such embodiments, the tibial bearing14is embodied as posterior stabilizing tibial bearing and includes a spine60extending upwardly from the platform30. The spine60is positioned between the bearing surfaces42,44and includes an anterior side62and a posterior side64having a cam surface66. In the illustrative embodiment, the cam surface66has a substantially concave curvature. However, spines60including cam surfaces66having other geometries may be used in other embodiments. For example, a tibial bearing including a spine having a substantially “S”-shaped cross-sectional profile, such as the tibial bearing described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/165,582, entitled “Posterior Stabilized Orthopaedic Prosthesis” by Joseph G. Wyss, et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference, may be used in other embodiments.

Additionally, in such embodiments, the femoral component12is embodied as a posterior stabilized femoral component and includes an intracondyle notch or recess57(rather than an opening56). A posterior cam80(shown in phantom) and an anterior cam82are positioned in the intracondyle notch57. The posterior cam80is located toward the posterior side of the femoral component12and includes a cam surface86configured to engage or otherwise contact the cam surface66of the spine60of the tibial bearing12during.

It should be appreciated that although the orthopaedic knee prosthesis10may be embodied as either a posterior cruciate-retaining or cruciate-sacrificing knee prosthesis, the femoral component12and the tibial bearing14of the knee prosthesis10are discussed below, and illustrated in the remaining figures, in regard to a posterior cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis with the understanding that such description is equally applicable to those embodiments wherein orthopaedic knee prosthesis10is embodied as a posterior cruciate-sacrificing (posterior stabilized) orthopaedic knee prosthesis.

It should be appreciated that the illustrative orthopaedic knee prosthesis10is configured to replace a patient's right knee and, as such, the bearing surface42and the condyle52are referred to as being medially located; and the bearing surface44and the condyle54are referred to as being laterally located. However, in other embodiments, the orthopaedic knee prosthesis10may be configured to replace a patient's left knee. In such embodiments, it should be appreciated that the bearing surface42and the condyle52may be laterally located and the bearing surface44and the condyle54may be medially located. Regardless, the features and concepts described herein may be incorporated in an orthopaedic knee prosthesis configured to replace either knee joint of a patient.

Referring now toFIGS. 3-5, the femoral component12is configured to articulate on the tibial bearing14during use. Each condyle52,54of the femoral component12includes a condyle surface100, which is convexly curved in the sagittal plane and configured to contact the respective bearing surface42,44. For example, in one embodiment as shown inFIG. 3, when the orthopaedic knee prosthesis10is in extension or is otherwise not in flexion (e.g., a flexion of about 0 degrees), the condyle surface100of the condyle52contacts the bearing surface42(or bearing surface44in regard to condyle54) at one or more contact points102on the condyle surface100.

Additionally, as the orthopaedic knee prosthesis10is articulated through the middle degrees of flexion, the femoral component12contacts the tibial bearing14at one or more contact points on the condyle surface100. For example, in one embodiment as illustrated inFIG. 4, when the orthopaedic knee prosthesis10is articulated to a middle degree of flexion (e.g., at about 45 degrees), the condyle surface100contacts the bearing surface42at one or more contact points104on the condyle surface100. Similarly, as the orthopaedic knee prosthesis10is articulated to a late degree of flexion (e.g., at about 70 degrees of flexion), the condyle surface100contacts the bearing surface42at one or more contact points106on the condyle surface100as illustrated inFIG. 5. It should be appreciated, of course, that the femoral component12may contact the tibial bearing14at a plurality of contact points on the condyle surface100at any one particular degree of flexion. However, for clarity of description, only the contact points102,104,106have been illustrated inFIGS. 3-5, respectively.

The orthopaedic knee prosthesis10is configured such that the amount of paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component12relative to the tibial bearing14may be reduced or otherwise delayed to a later (i.e., larger) degree of flexion. In particular, as discussed in more detail below, the condyle surface100of one or both of the condyles52,54has particular geometry or curvature configured to reduce and/or delay anterior translations and, in some embodiments, promote “roll-back” or posterior translation, of the femoral component12. It should be appreciated that by delaying the onset of paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component12to a larger degree of flexion, the overall occurrence of paradoxical anterior translation may be reduced during those activities of a patient in which deep flexion is not typically obtained.

In a typical orthopaedic knee prosthesis, paradoxical anterior translation may occur whenever the knee prosthesis is positioned at a degree of flexion greater than zero degrees. The likelihood of anterior translation generally increases as the orthopaedic knee prosthesis is articulated to larger degrees of flexion, particularly in the mid-flexion range. In such orientations, paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component on the tibial bearing can occur whenever the tangential (traction) force between the femoral component and the tibial bearing fails to satisfy the following equation:
T<μN  (1)

wherein “T” is the tangential (traction) force, “μ” is the coefficient of friction of the femoral component and the tibial bearing, and “N” is the normal force between the femoral component and the tibial bearing. As a generalization, the tangential (traction) force between the femoral component and the tibial bearing can be defined as
T=M/R(2)

wherein “T” is the tangential (traction) force between the femoral component and the tibial bearing, “M” is the knee moment, and “R” is the radius of curvature in the sagittal plane of the condyle surface in contact with the tibial bearing at the particular degree of flexion. It should be appreciated that equation (2) is a simplification of the governing real-world equations, which does not consider such other factors as inertia and acceleration. Regardless, the equation (2) provides insight that paradoxical anterior translation of an orthopaedic knee prosthesis may be reduced or delayed by controlling the radius of curvature of the condyle surface of the femoral component. That is, by controlling the radius of curvature of the condyle surface (e.g., increasing or maintaining the radius of curvature), the right-hand side of equation (2) may be reduced, thereby decreasing the value of the tangential (traction) force and satisfying the equation (1). As discussed above, by ensuring that the tangential (traction) force satisfies equation (1), paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component on the tibial bearing may be reduced or otherwise delayed to a greater degree of flexion.

Based on the above analysis, to reduce or delay the onset of paradoxical anterior translation, the geometry of the condyle surface100of one or both of the condyles52,54of the femoral component12is controlled. For example, in some embodiments, the radius of curvature of the condyle surface100is controlled such that the radius of curvature is held constant over a range of degrees of flexion and/or is increased in the early to mid flexion ranges. Comparatively, typical femoral components have decreasing radii of curvatures beginning at the distal radius of curvature (i.e., at about 0 degrees of flexion). However, it has been determined that by maintaining a relatively constant radius of curvature (i.e., not decreasing the radius of curvature) over a predetermined range of degrees of early to mid-flexion and/or increasing the radius of curvature over the predetermined range of degrees of flexion may reduce or delay paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component12. Additionally, in some embodiments, the rate of change in the radius of curvature of the condyle surface in the early to mid flexion ranges (e.g., from about 0 degrees to about 90 degrees) is controlled such that the rate of change is less than a predetermined threshold. That is, it has been determined that if the rate of decrease of the radius of curvature of the condyle surface100is greater than the predetermined threshold, paradoxical anterior translation may occur.

Accordingly, in some embodiments as illustrated inFIGS. 6-8, the condyle surface100of the femoral component12has an increased radius of curvature in early to middle degrees of flexion from a smaller radius of curvature R1to a larger radius of curvature R2. By increasing the radius of curvature, paradoxical anterior translation may be reduced or delayed to a later degree of flexion as discussed in more detail below.

The amount of increase between the radius of curvature R2and the radius of curvature R3, as well as, the degree of flexion on the condyle surface100at which such increase occurs has been determined to affect the occurrence of paradoxical anterior translation. Multiple simulations of various femoral component designs were performed using the LifeMOD/Knee Sim, version 1007.1.0 Beta 16 software program, which is commercially available from LifeModeler, Inc. of San Clemente, Calif., to analyze the effect of increasing the radius of curvature of the condyle surface of the femoral components in early and mid flexion. Based on such analysis, it has been determined that paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component relative to the tibial bearing may be reduced or otherwise delayed by increasing the radius of curvature of the condyle surface by an amount in the range of about 0.5 millimeters to about 5 millimeters or more at a degree of flexion in the range of about 30 degrees of flexion to about 90 degrees of flexion.

For example, the graphs200,250illustrated inFIGS. 10 and 11present the results of a deep bending knee simulation using a femoral component wherein the radius of curvature of the condyle surface is increased by 0.5 millimeters (i.e., from 25.0 millimeters to 25.5 millimeters) at 30 degrees of flexion, at 50 degrees of flexion, at 70degrees of flexion, and at 90 degrees of flexion. Similarly, the graphs300,350illustrated inFIGS. 12 and 13present the results of a deep bending knee simulation using a femoral component wherein the radius of curvature of the condyle surface is increased by 1.0 millimeters (i.e., from 25.0 millimeters to 26.0 millimeters) at 30 degrees of flexion, at 50 degrees of flexion, at 70 degrees of flexion, and at 90 degrees of flexion. The graphs400and450illustrated inFIGS. 14 and 15present the results of a deep bending knee simulation using a femoral component wherein the radius of curvature of the condyle surface is increased by 2.0 millimeters (i.e., from 25.0 millimeters to 27.0 millimeters) at 30 degrees of flexion, at 50 degrees of flexion, at 70 degrees of flexion, and at 90 degrees of flexion. Additionally, the graphs500,550illustrated inFIGS. 16 and 17present the results of a deep bending knee simulation using a femoral component wherein the radius of curvature of the condyle surface is increased by 5.0 millimeters (i.e., from 25.0 millimeters to 26.0 millimeters) at 30 degrees of flexion, at 50 degrees of flexion, at 70 degrees of flexion, and at 90 degrees of flexion.

In the graphs200,300,400,500, the condylar lowest or most distal points (CLP) of the medial condyle (“med”) and the lateral condyle (“lat”) of the femoral component are graphed as a representation of the relative positioning of the femoral component to the tibial bearing. As such, a downwardly sloped line represents roll-back of the femoral component on the tibial bearing and an upwardly sloped line represents anterior translation of the femoral component on the tibial bearing. In the graphs250,350,450,550, the amount of relative internal-external rotation in degrees between the simulated femoral component and tibial bearing for each illustrative embodiment are graphed with respect to each degree of flexion. An upwardly sloped line in graphs250,350,450,550corresponds to an amount of internal rotation of the tibia with respect to the femur (or external rotation of the femur with respect to the tibia).

As illustrated in the graphs200,300,400,500, anterior sliding of the femoral component was delayed until after about 100 degrees of flexion in each of the embodiments; and the amount of anterior translation was limited to less than about 1 millimeter. In particular, “roll-back” of the femoral component on the tibial bearing was promoted by larger increases in the radius of curvature of the condyle surface at earlier degrees of flexion. Additionally, as illustrated in graphs250,350,450,550, internal-external rotation between the femoral component and tibial bearing was increased by larger increases in the radius of curvature of the condyle surface at earlier degrees of flexion. Of course, amount of increase in the radius of curvature and the degree of flexion at which such increase is introduced is limited by other factors such as the anatomical joint space of the patient's knee, the size of the tibial bearing, and the like. Regardless, based on the simulations reported in the graphs200,250,300,350,400,450,500,550, paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component on the tibial bearing can be reduced or otherwise delayed by increasing the radius of curvature of the condyle surface of the femoral component during early to mid flexion.

Accordingly, referring back toFIGS. 6-9, the condyle surface100in the sagittal plane is formed in part from a number of curved surface sections102,104in one embodiment. The sagittal ends of each curved surface section102,204are tangent to the sagittal ends of any adjacent curved surface section of the condyles surface100. Each curved surface section102,104is defined by a respective radius of curvature. In particular, the curved surface section102is defined by a radius of curvature R1and the curved surface section104is defined by a radius of curvature R2.

As discussed above, the condyle surface100of the femoral component12is configured such that the radius of curvature R2of the curved surface section104is greater than the radius of curvature R1of the curved surface section102. In one embodiment, the radius of curvature R2is greater than the radius of curvature R1by 0.5 millimeters or more. In another embodiment, the radius of curvature R2is greater than the radius of curvature R1by 1 millimeters or more. Additionally in another embodiment, the radius of curvature R2is greater than the radius of curvature R1by 2 millimeters or more. In a particular embodiment, the radius of curvature R2is greater than the radius of curvature R3by a distance in the range of about 0.5 millimeters to about 5 millimeters.

It should be appreciated, however, that the particular increase of radius of curvature between R1and R2may be based on or scaled to the particular size of the femoral component12in some embodiments. For example, in some embodiments, the increase of the radius of curvature between R1and R2may be based on the size of R1. That is, the ratio of the radius of curvature R1to the radius of curvature R2may be below a predetermined threshold or within a specified range of a target value in some embodiments. For example, in some embodiments, the ratio of the radius of curvature R1to the radius of curvature R2is between 0.80 and 0.99. In one particular embodiment, the ratio of the radius of curvature R1to the radius of curvature R2is between 0.90 and 0.99.

Each of the curved surface sections102,104contacts the bearing surface42(or44) of the tibial bearing14through different ranges of degrees of flexion. For example, the curved surface section102extends from an earlier degree of flexion θ1to a later degree of flexion θ2. The curved surface section104extends from the degree of flexion θ2to a later degree of flexion θ3. The particular degrees of flexion θ1, θ2, and θ3, may vary between embodiments and be based on criteria such as the type of orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized), positioning of other component of the orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., the positioning of a cam of the femoral component12), the size of the femoral cam, the curvature of the tibial bearing14, the anatomy of a patient, etc. For example, in one embodiment, as illustrated inFIG. 6, the curved surface section102extends from a degree of flexion θ1of about 0 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ2of about 30 degrees of flexion. The curved surface section104extends from the degree of flexion θ2of about 30 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ3of about 110 degrees of flexion.

As discussed above, the particular degrees of flexion θ1, θ2, θ3may be determined based on the particular embodiment and other features of the femoral component12. For example, the larger degree of flexion θ3may be determined or otherwise based on the desire to allow the most posterior-superior end110of the femoral component12to “wrap” around. Such a configuration may properly size or configure the femoral component12for positioning within the joint gap of a patient. The end110of the femoral component12may be formed from a number of additional radii of curvatures, which begin at the degree of flexion θ3. As such, the particular degree of flexion θ3may be determined or based on the degree of flexion at which the additional radii of curvatures must begin to form the end110as desired.

In another embodiment, as illustrated inFIG. 7, the curved surface section102extends from a degree of flexion θ1of about 0 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ2of about 50 degrees of flexion. The curved surface section104extends from the degree of flexion θ2of about 50 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ3of about 110 degrees of flexion. Additionally, in another embodiment, as illustrated inFIG. 8, the curved surface section102extends from a degree of flexion θ1of about 0 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ2of about 70 degrees of flexion. The curved surface section104extends from the degree of flexion θ2of about 70 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ3of about 110 degrees of flexion. In another illustrative embodiment, as illustrated inFIG. 9, the curved surface section102extends from a degree of flexion θ1of about 0 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ2of about 90 degrees of flexion. The curved surface section104extends from the degree of flexion θ2of about 90 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ3of about 110 degrees of flexion.

Again, it should be appreciated that the embodiments ofFIGS. 6-9are illustrative embodiments and, in other embodiments, each of the curved surface sections102,104may extend from degrees of flexion different from those shown and discussed above in regard toFIGS. 6-9. For example, in each of the embodiments ofFIGS. 6-9, although the curved surface section102is illustrated as beginning at about 0 degrees of flexion, the curved surface section102may begin at a degree of flexion prior to 0 degrees of flexion (i.e., a degree of hyperextension) in other embodiments.

Referring now toFIG. 18, it should be appreciated that although the illustrative embodiments ofFIGS. 6-9include only one increase of radius of curvature (i.e., between R1and R2), the condyle surface may include any number of increases in radius of curvature in other embodiments. For example, in one embodiment as shown inFIG. 18, the condyle surface100may be formed from a number of curved surface sections600,602,604,606,608, the sagittal ends of each of which are tangent to adjacent curved surface sections. The curved surface section600extends from an earlier degree of flexion θ1to a later degree of flexion θ2. The curved surface section602extends from the degree of flexion θ2to a later degree of flexion θ3. The curved surface section604extends from the degree of flexion θ3to a later degree of flexion θ4. The curved surface section606extends from the degree of flexion θ4to a later degree of flexion θ5. The curved surface section608extends from the degree of flexion θ5to a later degree of flexion θ6.

Each of the curved surface sections600,602,604,606,608is defined by a respective radius of curvature. In particular, the curved surface section600is defined by a radius of curvature R1, the curved surface section602is defined by a radius of curvature R2, the curved surface section604is defined by a radius of curvature R3, the curved surface section606is defined by a radius of curvature R4, and the curved surface section607is defined by a radius of curvature R5. The radius of curvature R2is greater than the radius of curvature R1. Similarly, the radius of curvature R3is greater than the radius of curvature R2. The radius of curvature R4is greater than the radius of curvature R3. And, the radius of curvature R5is greater than the radius of curvature R4. In this way, the condyle surface100is formed from a plurality of curved surface sections, each having a radius of curvature greater than the adjacent anterior curved surface section. Again, the embodiment illustrated inFIG. 18is just one illustrative embodiment. In other embodiments, the condyle surface100may be formed from a greater or lesser number of curved surface sections having an increased radius of curvature relative to an anteriorly adjacent curved surface section.

Referring now toFIG. 19, the condyle surface100may include an increase in radius of curvature and a decrease in radius of curvature in the early to middle degrees of flexion. That is, in some embodiments, the radius of curvature of the condyle surface100may initially increase from an initial radius of curvature to an increased radius of curvature and subsequently decrease to a decreased radius of curvature that is larger than the initial radius prior to late flexion (e.g., prior to about 90 degrees of flexion).

For example, in one embodiment shown inFIG. 19, the condyle surface100be formed from a number of curved surface sections700,702,704, the sagittal ends of each of which are tangent to adjacent curved surface sections. The curved surface section700extends from an earlier degree of flexion θ1to a later degree of flexion θ2. The curved surface section72extends from the degree of flexion θ2to a later degree of flexion θ3. The curved surface section704extends from the degree of flexion θ3to a later degree of flexion θ4.

Each of the curved surface sections700,702,704is defined by a respective radius of curvature. In particular, the curved surface section700is defined by a radius of curvature R1, the curved surface section6702is defined by a radius of curvature R2, and the curved surface section704is defined by a radius of curvature R3. The radius of curvature R2is greater than the radius of curvature R1. The radius of curvature R3is less than the radius of curvature R2and greater than the radius of curvature R1. In this way, the radius of curvature of the condyle surface100initially increases from R1to R2and subsequently decreases to R3. However, because R3is still greater than the distal radius R1, paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component12may be reduced or delayed as discussed in detail above.

Additionally, as discussed above, the particular amount of increase between R1and R2and between R1and R3may vary between embodiments and be based on one or more of a number of various criteria such as, for example, the type of orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized), positioning of other component of the orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., the positioning of a cam of the femoral component12), the size of the femoral cam, the curvature of the tibial bearing14, the anatomy of a patient, etc. In one particular embodiment, each of the radius of curvature R2, R3is greater than the radius of curvature R1by at least 0.5 millimeters.

Referring now toFIG. 20, another way to control the radius of curvature of the condyle surface100is to maintain the radius of curvature through early to middle degrees of flexion. As discussed above, typical femoral components have decreasing radii of curvatures beginning at the distal radius of curvature (i.e., at about 0 degrees of flexion). However, it has been determined that maintaining a relatively constant radius of curvature (i.e., not decreasing the radius of curvature) over a predetermined range of degrees of early to mid-flexion may reduce or delay paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component12.

Accordingly, in one embodiment as shown inFIG. 20, the condyle surface100may be formed from a curved surface section800. The curved surface section800extends from an earlier degree of flexion θ1to a later degree of flexion θ2. The curved surface section800is defined by a constant or substantially constant radius of curvature R1. In the illustrative embodiment, the curved surface section800subtends an angle of about 110 degrees, but may be larger or small in other embodiments. For example, in one particular embodiment, the curved surface section800subtends an angle of at least 50 degrees. Additionally, as discussed above, the particular degrees of flexion θ1, θ2may be based on one or more of a number of various criteria such as, for example, the type of orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized), positioning of other component of the orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., the positioning of a cam of the femoral component12), the size of the femoral cam, the curvature of the tibial bearing14, the anatomy of a patient, etc.

The overall shape and design of the condyle surface100of the femoral component12has been described above in regard to a single condyle52,54of the femoral component12. It should be appreciated that in some embodiments both condyles52,54of the femoral component12may be symmetrical and have similar condyle surfaces100. However, in other embodiments, the condyles52,54of the femoral component12may asymmetrical. For example, as illustrated inFIG. 21, the femoral component12may include a second condyle52,54having a condyle surface900, which is defined in part by a plurality of curved surface sections902,904. The curved surface section902extends from an earlier degree of flexion θ4to a later degree of flexion θ5. The curved surface section904extends from the degree of flexion θ5to a later degree of flexion θ6. The curved surface section902is defined by a radius of curvature R3and the curved surface section904is defined by a radius of curvature R4.

As such, in embodiments wherein the condyles52,54are symmetrical, the degree of flexion θ4is substantially equal to the degree of flexion θ1, the degree of flexion θ5is substantially equal to the degree of flexion θ2, and the degree of flexion θ6is substantially equal to the degree of flexion θ3. Additionally, the radius of curvature R3is substantially equal to the radius of curvature R1and the radius of curvature R4is substantially equal to the radius of curvature R2.

However, in other embodiments, the condyles52,54are asymmetrical. As such, the degree of flexion θ4may be different from the degree of flexion θ1. Additionally or alternatively, the degree of flexion θ5may be different from the degree of flexion θ2. That is, the increase in radius of curvature from R1to R2and from R3to R4may occur at different degrees of flexion between the condyles52,54. Further, the degree of flexion θ6may be different from the degree of flexion θ3. Additionally, in those embodiments wherein the condyles52,54are asymmetrical, the radius of curvature R3may be different from the radius of curvature R1and/or the radius of curvature R4may be different from the radius of curvature R2.