Dot-tag visibility IP protocol

The system employs full transceivers, each having peer-to-peer, client/server, and IP networking capabilities, and covering open-area ranges of up to 100 feet. The system uses Low Frequency for data communications so it can achieve both low cost (less costly than many RF-ID tags) and long battery life (10-15 years). Additionally, since these tags have batteries, static RAM maybe be added at very low cost, as well as sensors, LED's displays etc.

BACKGROUND

It is not easy to provide worldwide and arbitrarily scalable visibility of radio tags.

Prior-art systems use fixed tag IDs and require prodigious database resources available at all times to be able to interpret the meaning of a fixed-ID tag.

Such systems require that all tags in a given area be interrogated in order to discern whether a particular tag of interest happens to be in the given area.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The inventive system employs full transceivers, each having peer-to-peer, client/server, and IP networking capabilities, and and covering open-area ranges of up to 100 feet. The system uses Low Frequency for data communications so it can achieve both low cost (less costly than many RF-ID tags) and long battery life (10-15 years). Additionally, since these tags have batteries, static RAM maybe be added at very low cost, as well as sensors, LED's displays etc. The only disadvantage of this approach is that Baud rates will always be limited to under 9,600 baud and in most case the tags operate at 1,200 baud. In contrast both passive and active RF-ID tags now on the market use non-radiating backscattered mode, and all work as transponders, i.e they require a carrier.

Current RFID tags all have a pre-assigned fixed ID serial number. In most cases this serial number is created when the tag itself is manufactured. As a result current RFID tags and tag network depend on addressing schemes based on fixed arbitrary numbers, often 128 bits long. This also requires that key data and information all be stored in remote IT systems.

A good analogy is shown inFIG. 1. As seen at “A”, packages24could be identified with a unique number20with all information about ship to, ship from, packing slip etc. all contained on a server21with a key based on the random number20.

In contrast as shown at “B”, the same information22can also be contained on the package23itself either as human readable or machine readable data. This B approach is far too expensive with current RFID tags since they must use EEPROM to store any read/write data and the read write cycles are both slow and extremely power hungry.

Tags according to the invention use low-cost static RAM. On a bit-by-bit comparison batteries and static RAM are faster and much lower cost than EEPROM. Batteries and RAM continue to be used for critical BIOS and date/time storage on PCs and laptops. The ability to use RAM in tags according to the invention opens up many other unexpected advantages. It is possible to use assignable addresses (consistent with IP addresses) that have become the standard. Protocols and programs that do things that have to be done with billions of addresses now found on the internet exist have been in use for many years and are free of charge.

Tags according to the invention can use addresses that are IPv4 computable and in combination with a suitable router are IPv6 compatible. Each such tag is in effect a web server with an IPv6 address and a subnet address.

This makes it possible to search all routers (according to the invention) that connected to the Internet and find any tag anywhere in the world using the existing www infrastructure. With either the IPv4 or the IPv6 standard mobility world wide and search schemes are established and tested. It is possible to create Virtual Private Networks (VPN), with same security now used by all major financial institutions, or communications may be carried out with little or no security—it is the customer's choice.

Because RuBee tags work in harsh environments, for example near steel and water, they have applications in many different industries. Some examples include medical devices, pharmaceuticals, asset tracking in health care, asset tracking in business, records tracking, tools, aircraft parts, livestock, retail visibility at item level, and airline baggage. The visibility network can transparently provide visibility at a low cost to all of these industries.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Each tag according to the invention has a 32-bit standard IP address and a 32-bit subnet address. Each tag also has a unique Network Interface Card (NIC) ID, equivalent to a MAC (media access control layer) address. The two IP addresses are manufactured as a standard 11.11.11.0. This is used for discovery when a new tag is introduced into a RuBee network. A suitable variant of the well-known Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) as well as a Reverse Address Resolution Protocol (RARP) is used for radio tags according to the invention. This means a RuBee router can discover all tags NIC's, and can assign an IP address in about a second per tag, when it is introduced within a communications area. The tags can all work within a suitable the Top Level Domain (TLD) such as “.tag”, and word-based names may be registered for individual (e.g. www.drjacksmith.tag) or groups of tags (www.Medco.tag), and these maybe accessed through a name server called a Tag Name Server (TNS), functioning much like a well-known Domain Name Server (DNS).

The base station apparatus employed may be that disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/462,981 filed Aug. 7, 2006, incorporated herein by reference. The passive tags can be those employed in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/419,750, filed May 22, 2006, incorporated herein by reference. The tags disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/423,509 (incorporated herein by reference) may be employed.

The subnet addresses in each tag are used to categorize the tag item type. For example all tags used to identify doctors in a hospital have a unique subnet, patients another subnet, tools used in surgery another subnet. When tags are used for livestock many sub-categories may be assigned etc. Each RuBee tag has 32 bits of subnet or about 4.2 billion separate possible categories. The major advantage of the subnet is that a router can quickly discover new entries (e.g can ping an area for doctors, nurses, patients, devices, tools, cows, airline baggage) and rapidly discover new members of an expected subnet. In this way the system need not waste time exchanging messages with tags that are not of interest.

Turning now toFIG. 1, we see a Conventional RF-ID tag using a license-plate fixed-ID approach. This may be analogized to the use of a fixed ID20on a package24. This requires an IT system21to look up name, address and content. This is seen in RF-ID systems that are now in place.

In contrast as shown at B, the system according to the invention includes as much information22as possible on the package23with the item to minimize IT costs.

FIG. 2shows an existing EPCglobal approach25. This approach25requires several steps to discover what a tag26is attached to. It has to get the fixed ID number27from a base station28or server. Then the system must go to an Object Name Server29to look up that ID, and to access a data base, which may also be ONS29, for information30provided to a user32in response to a request31.

FIG. 3shows a system35according to the invention, which uses IP addresses36and subnet addresses37and holds most of the critical information39in memory itself. The LF tags used in this system can do this at a much lower cost than the prior-art passive ID tags since prior-art tags use more expensive EEPROM for storage. A Battery and static memory in the tags of the present system, is less costly than EEPROM. Tags according to the invention are manufactured, as mentioned above, with a standard IP 11.11.11.1 and subnet. They may be programmed with data when the tag is attached to a product, an event portrayed inFIG. 3.

FIG. 4shows exemplary subnet addresses45based on categories the product or person might meet. For example a medical device has a different subnet address than a doctor46, and a patient47. A beef cow48has a different subnet address than a dairy cow49. This means that many subnet addresses may coexist within a network For example a router can ping a room to see if any physicians46are in the room and not have to talk to 200-300 stents that may also be stored in the same room. A user may ask 100's of routers that are online to ping hip implants50made by one manufacturer.

FIG. 5shows a tag56after it has been programmed with a serial number (same as a Mac address, or NIC number) as well as other data including the subnet address. It is then placed into a network57. The router55detects that it has the 11.11.11.1 address and provides a new IP address from a remote IP authority, or from a block of IP addresses contained in the router. This is equivalent to the well-known DHCP protocol used in many IP subnets. Thus, as shown inFIG. 6, the tag56may be programmed with a unique IP address59once it is placed with a network57and is discovered. Then, as shown inFIG. 7, once programmed the tag56maybe accessed via either a special IPv4 address61or a standard IPv6 address62via the router55.

FIG. 8-10show tags80as they are moved from one network81to another82to another83are discovered via a RARP in the router so that they always have a unique IP and can be localized within any network. The limit is 4.2 billion tags with 4.2 billion different subnets.

FIG. 11shows a user102who may search the web for a specific tag103. The tag103may be given a name104in the same manner a web site is given a name. An optional Tag Name Server104translates this name into an IPv6 address105and finds the tag on the web. The user may also simply enter in the IP address105of the tag.

FIG. 12shows a result, namely that the data107contained in the tag103is displayed in a way that is similar to what might be viewed on a web page. The Tag103becomes a server rather like an HTTP server. Such tags may be given domain names in a suitable Top Level Domain name .such as tag (Dot-Tag) and this designation may then be used for manual or automated searches initiated by middleware. Note that optionally the data path106may be an SSL (secure sockets layer) path, protecting the confidentiality of retrieved data.

Those skilled in the art will have no difficulty devising myriad obvious variants and improvements, none of which depart from the invention, and all of which are intended to be encompassed within the claims which follow.