Amplifier arrangement, and method for compensating for an offset

An amplifier arrangement and a method for compensating for an offset in an amplifier is provided. A respective switch for connecting together the inputs in a compensation operating mode and for interrupting the feedback path in this operating mode is provided in an amplifier. A control device detects an output signal and drives a controllable current source, which can be coupled to one of the two inputs of the amplifier, in such a manner that a compensation current which minimizes the offset is provided. The arrangement and method can be used, for example, in transmission arrangements.

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of the priority date of German application DE 10 2005 007 632.7, filed on Feb. 18, 2005, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an amplifier arrangement, to the use thereof, and to a method for compensating for an offset in an amplifier.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Offsets may have different causes in a signal processing chain of an integrated circuit. Fluctuations in the supply voltage, temperature drift effects, fluctuations in process parameters during fabrication and matching problems between electronic components in the case of differential signal routing thus contribute, for example, to the occurrence of offsets.

Such direct current (DC) offsets may have undesirable effects in transmission arrangements, for example. DC offsets which occur in the baseband signal processing system of a transmitter thus result in a sinusoidal signal at the respective transmission frequency at the output of the modulator. This significantly increases error vectors in digital modulation methods. It is therefore desirable to be able to compensate for such DC offsets.

It is possible to reduce the DC offsets by introducing a compensation signal, which compensates for the offset, at the input of the baseband signal processing system of a transmission arrangement. This may be carried out, for example, when fabricating mobile radios. In this case, the compensation voltage (which is respectively needed for the purpose of compensation) for each individual device may be stored in a nonvolatile memory of the baseband chip. In the reception path of a mobile radio, a DC offset may even result in system failure since the extremely high gain in the analog baseband may result in transient spikes which may drive individual stages of the signal processing chain into saturation and may result in analog/digital converters being overdriven.

It goes without saying that DC offsets may be avoided using AC coupling, that is to say a high-pass filter having a low cut-off frequency. However, such AC coupling requires a relatively large chip area on account of the series capacitances which are normally provided for implementation. In addition, information components of useful information may be removed or filtered out in an undesirable manner.

Code division multiple access (CDMA) methods which operate in a continuous-time mode are used in modern mobile radio methods, for example the so-called Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS). Accordingly, it is not possible, in contrast to earlier mobile radio methods, for example GSM (Global System for Mobile Communication), which operate using time division multiple access, to periodically interrupt the signal chain in order to be able to carry out calibrations during transmission operation.

DC feedback affords another possible way of compensating for DC offsets. However, this principle has the disadvantage that a relatively low cut-off frequency of the high-pass filter is required in order to avoid the useful signal being excessively distorted. However, this means that the transient response time becomes relatively long, which, in turn, has adverse effects on the received signal. Another disadvantage results from transients which may occur when there is a sudden change in the gain, even in the case of high-pass filters which settle more rapidly, and may exceed the useful signal many times over. The analog/digital converter thus cannot be controlled in an ideal manner. In particular, the switching transients which have been mentioned and occur when the gain value is changed in the reception path of a transmission/reception unit result in considerably impaired electrical properties of the receiver.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of one or more aspects of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention, and is neither intended to identify key or critical elements of the invention, nor to delineate the scope thereof. Rather, the primary purpose of the summary is to present one or more concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.

The invention is directed to an amplifier arrangement and a method for compensating for an offset in an amplifier arrangement. The arrangement and method, on account of their accuracy, are suitable for methods which operate in a continuous-time mode and for use in mobile radios.

In one embodiment of the invention, the amplifier arrangement comprises an amplifier with two inputs and an output, and a feedback path that couples the output to at least one of the two inputs. The arrangement further comprises a first switch configured to couple the two inputs to one another, such that they can be switched in a compensation operating mode, and a second switch configured to interrupt the feedback path in the compensation operating mode. The arrangement also includes a controllable current source coupled to at least one of the two inputs of the amplifier, and a control device configured to couple the output of the amplifier to the controllable current source in order to reduce an offset at the inputs of the amplifier in the compensation operating mode by providing a compensation current.

In another embodiment of the invention, a method for compensating for an offset in an amplifier comprises interrupting a feedback path of the amplifier from an output to at least one input of the amplifier, and coupling two inputs of the amplifier to one another. The method further comprises detecting an output signal from the amplifier, and providing a controllable compensation current at one of the inputs of the amplifier on the basis of the detected output signal.

In accordance with the invention, DC offsets at the input of the amplifier are compensated for by adding a correction current at the input of the amplifier. In this case, the inputs of the amplifier are connected to one another during calibration or compensation. During the compensation operating mode, the amplifier is operated without an external connection, namely with the feedback path interrupted. This is also referred to as open-loop operation of an amplifier. If there is an offset, the output of the amplifier tilts toward the positive or negative supply voltage of the amplifier, depending on the polarity of the offset. This property is used to determine the suitable compensation signal. A DC offset at the input of the amplifier can thus be avoided or at least considerably reduced.

Since it is only necessary to detect the output signal from the amplifier in order to determine whether the signal corresponds to the supply potential or to the reference potential, compensation can be carried out with particularly little complexity.

In one example the correction current is generated using a number of “n” weighted current sources, beginning with the largest current source which is controlled by the most significant bit (MSB) down to the smallest current source which is controlled by the least significant bit (LSB). Depending on accuracy, this is effected with a resolution of “n” bits.

Successive approximation is carried out as an iterative method in one example of the invention.

A flipping of the output voltage of the amplifier from the supply potential to the reference potential of the amplifier or vice versa indicates that the optimum correction current has been exceeded. That correction current which was impressed one iteration step beforehand therefore represents or is associated with the intrinsic offset of the amplifier for this bit. The method is then repeated for the next, less significant bit, that is to say using the next current source with a lower weighting.

In order to dimension the maximum correction current which needs to be determined in an initial simulation in order to compensate for an offset, the amplifier is regarded as being connected. If an adjustable gain is provided, the maximum gain is taken as a basis. On account of the high gain during open-loop operation, linear operation is not employed.

If a plurality of amplifiers are provided in a circuit, for example in a transceiver, the compensation operations described can be carried out concurrently, e.g., in parallel, for each operational amplifier. This is made possible by the fact that the inputs of each amplifier are short-circuited in one example and the outputs are disconnected anyway. Adjusting the amplifiers but not the individual programming positions makes it possible to considerably reduce the complexity. Therefore the amplifier itself and not its external connection is evaluated for the offset.

The amplifier in one example is an operational amplifier. Alternatively or additionally, the amplifier may be a differential amplifier.

In one example the amplifier arrangement described is used in a transmission path and/or a reception path of a transmission and reception unit.

By way of example, the amplifier arrangement may be respectively provided in the in-phase path and in the quadrature path at the input of a radio frequency module of a transmission arrangement.

If the input-side short-circuiting of the inputs of the operational amplifier is not effected directly at the input but rather at the input of an upstream stage, for example a baseband block, the entire baseband block may be advantageously concomitantly adjusted, or one or more other upstream stages may be concomitantly adjusted. This condition may be taken into account when dimensioning the adjustment range of the controllable current source.

In one embodiment the controllable current source comprises a plurality of current sources which are connected and disconnected independently of one another. In such an example, the current sources are graduated in binary fashion.

In addition, instead of the successive approximation method, it is also possible to use another method, for example a counting method or a weighing method, depending on the application in accordance with the invention.

Both area-intensive AC coupling and DC feedback can be dispensed with as a result of the compensation in accordance with the invention.

In one example a memory is employed to store the programming (which is determined during compensation operation) of the plurality of current sources for subsequent normal operation.

The compensation in accordance with the invention is accurate enough to significantly improve operation of the amplifier arrangement despite being carried out once, for example when the mobile radio which comprises said amplifier arrangement is switched on. The primary factors of influence for a DC offset are dictated typically by the technology and are dependent on matching of the components and are not primarily caused by temperature and/or drift effects or by supply voltage fluctuations. The DC offset at the input of an amplifier can thus be considerably reduced in accordance with the invention.

Yet another reduction in the DC offset can be achieved by means of combination with a DC feedback loop of the amplifier arrangement. This makes it possible to increase the compensation accuracy and thus to further reduce its execution speed and implementation complexity. Transients which interfere with the system are nevertheless reduced to a negligible level.

According to one or more aspects of the present invention, the control circuit comprises a signal input for disconnection. This signal input is connected to the circuit, with the circuit in the active operating state being designed to output a disconnection signal to the control circuit. This reduces the power consumption of the control circuit, since said control circuit is no longer required during the active operating state.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1shows an operational amplifier1having a first input2, a second input3and an output4. In addition, provision is made of respective connections5,6for supplying a supply potential and a reference potential for the operational amplifier1. A differential input7,8of the arrangement is coupled to the inputs2,3of the operational amplifier via a respective resistor9,10. A switch11which is in the form of a normally open contact is connected between the terminals7,8of the differential input in order to selectively short-circuit the inputs2,3of the operational amplifier in a compensation operating mode of the operational amplifier. In this case, the inputs2,3are connected to one another via the series circuit comprising the resistors9,10. The output4of the operational amplifier is coupled selectively to an output13of the amplifier arrangement via a switch12which is in the form of a normally closed contact.

The output13of the arrangement is connected to the first input2of the operational amplifier1in a feedback path. The feedback path has an impedance which, in the present example, is in the form of a resistor14. The output4of the operational amplifier1also is connected selectively to a control device16via a switch15which is in the form of a normally open contact. The switch12for interrupting the feedback path and the switch15are likewise provided for activation in the compensation operating mode. A controllable current source17is connected to a plurality of outputs of the control device16. An output of the controllable current source17is connected to each of the two inputs2,3of the operational amplifier1via a respective switch18,19. In order to be driven, the switches18,19are coupled to the control device16in such a manner that the controllable current source17selectively emits a controlled current to the input2or to the input3of the operational amplifier.

The control device16is configured to compensate for an offset at the differential input7,8of the amplifier arrangement. In the compensation operating mode, the switch11is closed in order to short-circuit the inputs of the operational amplifier1. At the same time, the switch12at the output is opened, so that the feedback path is interrupted and the amplifier is in open-loop operation. In addition, in the compensation operating mode, the control device16is connected to the output4via the switch15. In contrast, during normal operation, the switches11,12,15are in the switch position shown.

In the present example, the control device16is configured to carry out compensation in accordance with a successive approximation method. Since the differential inputs2,3of the operational amplifier are short-circuited, the output4tilts either to the supply voltage or to the reference potential, namely one of the potentials (which are supplied to the inputs5,6) of the voltage supply for the operational amplifier1, depending on the polarity and magnitude of the offset at the input. The offset is compensated for by adding a correction current at the input2,3of the operational amplifier.

The controllable current source supplies the correction current, in a controllable manner, to the first or second input2,3of the operational amplifier1depending on the polarity of the offset. When the correction current is generated in discrete steps, for example, in graduated, binary fashion, the requisite correction current is successively approximated, with a resolution of “n” bits, using a corresponding number of “n” weighted current sources, beginning with the largest current source which is controlled by the bit having the greatest significance (MSB (most significant bit)). Flipping of the output voltage at the output4from the supply potential to the reference potential indicates that the optimum correction current has been exceeded. In one example the current which was impressed one step beforehand for this bit is thus determined since said current represents or is associated with the intrinsic offset of the operational amplifier for this resolution. The method is then repeated for the next bit, that is to say the bit for the next current source with a lower weighting. This results in a correction current which is provided within the resolution accuracy, as defined by the bit having the least significant resolution (LSB (least significant bit)). In this example, the controllable current source17comprises the weighted current sources.

In one example the control device16comprises a memory for storing the compensation information, namely the “n” bits for programming the controllable current source17. During normal operation which follows compensation operation, the information regarding the generation of the correction current, both in terms of the magnitude and in terms of the selection of the noninverting or inverting input2,3of the operational amplifier, is thus available. During normal operation, the determined correction current is superimposed on a useful signal (which can be supplied to the inputs2,3of the operational amplifier) in a manner that compensates for the offset.

In order to dimension the maximum correction current needed, that is to say the maximum offset which occurs, in one example, the operational amplifier is regarded as being connected since linear operation is not possible on account of the high open-loop gain.

If a plurality of operational amplifiers1are provided, it is possible, on account of the disconnection at the input and output, to adjust the plurality of operational amplifiers in parallel without any problems in a common integrated circuit.

Since offsets in amplifiers often are generated and caused by transistor matching problems in the symmetrical signal paths and by process fluctuations, the invention compensation with a high degree of precision and accuracy even when compensation is carried out once, for example when the system which comprises the amplifier is switched on.

The proposed amplifier arrangement is thus particularly suited to use in those circuits which are intended to process a continuous data stream without interruption and with a small offset. This is the case, for example, in modern mobile radio methods which use Code Division Multiple Access (abbreviated to CDMA) methods. The circuit arrangement described is thus particularly suited to the offset calibration of amplifiers in the baseband and radio frequency signal processing chain of transmission and reception paths in transceivers of mobile radios.

In one embodiment of the invention there is no need for any additional AC coupling or similar means in order to compensate for an offset. Nevertheless, depending on the application, other measures such as AC coupling or a DC feedback loop may be combined with the invention.

Accurate offset compensation leads to the avoidance of problems such as the carrier frequency showing through at the output of a transmitter. Problems of transient spikes and saturation, which are typically caused by DC offsets and can give rise to overdriving, are avoided in the reception path.

The proposed amplifier arrangement of the invention is also distinguished by the simple determination of whether or not a bit of a particular current source is to be set, since flipping of the output4from the supply voltage to the reference potential or vice versa can be detected in a very simple manner, and the signal to be detected is practically already present in the form of a digital signal at the output4during the compensation operation.

The invention may be executed fully automatically in one embodiment, for example by triggering with a signal when starting up the system which comprises the amplifier arrangement, with the result that any manual steps are dispensed with.

FIG. 2shows an example of a controlled current source according to one embodiment that comprises a plurality of current sources21,22,23,24which are connected in parallel and are graduated in binary fashion. In this case, the largest current source21provides eight times the current8I provided by the smallest current source24. Accordingly, the largest current source21is controlled using the most significant bit (MSB), while the smallest current source24is driven using the LSB (least significant bit). For this purpose, each current source21to24is connected in series with a respective switch25,26,27,28. The current sources in between provide twice and four times the current2I,4I (with regard to their weighting) of the smallest current source24controlled by the least significant bit. As proposed, the compensation current is determined, in accordance with successive approximation, from the bit with the highest weighting to the bit with the lowest weighting, that is to say from the current sources21to24. A resolution of n=4 bits is provided in this example, however, other resolutions may be employed.

In addition, in alternative designs, other weightings and other methods for compensating for the offset are also possible, depending on the application.

FIG. 3shows another exemplary embodiment of an amplifier arrangement according to the invention in a modification of the circuit shown inFIG. 1, wherein the controlled current source is not externally provided, but rather is internally accommodated within the operational amplifier. The circuit shown inFIG. 3largely corresponds, in terms of the components used, the design and the advantageous method of operation, to that shown inFIG. 1and, in this respect, it is not repeated again. However, in contrast toFIG. 1, a control input29is formed at the operational amplifier1inFIG. 3, said control input being connected to an output of the control device16in order to control the internal controlled current sources. The controlled current source still acts on an input2,3of the operational amplifier as discussed above.

Furthermore, in contrast toFIG. 1, a fully differential design of the signal path is provided inFIG. 3in such a manner that the output of the operational amplifier4,4′ is also designed to route differential signals and is coupled to the output13,13′ via a respective switch12,12′. The two connections of the output4,4′ are also correspondingly connected to a respective input of the control device16via a respective switch15,15′. The feedback path is also of differential design, namely with a respective resistor14,14′ between the output13,13′ and the inputs2,3of the operational amplifier. The resistors9,10have been replaced with short circuits.

As for the amplifier arrangement shown inFIG. 1, it holds true for the amplifier arrangement shown inFIG. 3that the correction current is impressed either at the input2or at the input3of the operational amplifier1under the control of the control device16.

In alternative embodiments, the features shown by way of example usingFIGS. 1 and 3may also be combined differently with one another in any desired manner without departing from the scope of the invention.

FIG. 4uses an exemplary embodiment to show one use of an amplifier arrangement (as described by way of example in accordance withFIGS. 1 and 3) in a transmission path of a mobile radio. In this case, a respective amplifier arrangement30,31according to the proposed principle is arranged at the in-phase input I and at the quadrature input Q of a radio frequency module32. The output of the radio frequency module32is coupled to an antenna33via a power amplifier (not depicted). The in-phase and quadrature inputs I, Q of the radio frequency module32are coupled to a respective corresponding output of a baseband module34. In the present case, the in-phase and quadrature paths are each designed to route differential signals.

In the example shown inFIG. 4, it is advantageously not only possible to compensate for an offset at the input of the amplifiers30,31but also to concomitantly adjust for the entire baseband module34as regards any offsets which may be present. For this purpose, switches35,36are provided at the input of the baseband module, which switches can be used to short-circuit the amplifier inputs in the radio frequency module over the entire baseband signal path in the compensation operating mode. It goes without saying that additional or fewer functional units may also be concomitantly included in offset compensation. The switches may be integrated in the baseband module34in one example.

It goes without saying that the proposed measure of compensating for the offset in further functional blocks which are connected to the input of the amplifier can also be applied, within the scope of the invention, to other systems as transmission paths of transceivers, for example.

FIG. 5shows one example of a method for determining the respective suitable compensation current for compensating for an offset in an amplifier arrangement according to the proposed principle. This method may be implemented, for example, in the control devices16shown inFIGS. 1 and 3and may be used to control a programmable current source as shown inFIG. 2.

While the method and other methods of the invention are illustrated and described below as a series of acts or events, it will be appreciated that the invention is not limited by the illustrated ordering of such acts or events. For example, some acts may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts or events apart from those illustrated and/or described herein, in accordance with the invention. In addition, not all illustrated actions may be required to implement a methodology in accordance with the invention.

In an initialization at37, the feedback path of the amplifier1is first of all interrupted and a short circuit is formed between the inputs2and3of the operational amplifier. The potential at the output of the operational amplifier is then checked in a comparison at38. in order to determine whether or not it corresponds to the supply potential at the supply voltage input5. If so (Y), the count n is set to 1 at39and, at the inverting input of the operational amplifier, a partial current I of n (n=1 in the present case) is added to the inverting input of the amplifier at40. The output voltage of the amplifier is then compared again with the supply voltage in a comparison at41. If the result is the same as before (Y), the index n is incremented by 1 (act42) and the process then continues at40. If not (N at41), a partial current I(n) is subtracted from the inverting input and the index n is likewise incremented by 1 at43. If the largest bit n has been reached (which is checked at44), compensation is ended but, if not, the process again continues at step40in which a partial current I(n) is added to the inverting input and the output potential is then compared with the supply potential. An analogous method results for the noninverting input of the amplifier if, after initialization at37and comparison at38, the comparison result which indicates that the output voltage of the amplifier is not equal to the supply potential is provided.

This method corresponds to implementation of the successive approximation method for current sources which are weighted in binary fashion. It goes without saying that other approximation methods and other weightings are also possible, within the scope of the invention, when generating the correction currents, depending on the application.

FIG. 6is an exemplary graph illustrating the output voltage offset in volts plotted against the input voltage offset in volts in an amplifier according to the invention. In this case, the graph also shows the compensation limit which can be derived from the respective offset voltage at the output. It can be seen that input offsets of up to 2.1 mV can be corrected using the current source weighting selected in the present case (namely binary) and the exemplary number of current sources, namely 4. In the illustration shown, the maximum possible correction current was selected in such a manner that, in the case of random distribution, the 3-sigma offset current at the differential pair of inputs of the operational amplifier, whose effect corresponds to a voltage at the input of 2.1 mV, can only just be corrected. If this range is exceeded, the remaining residual error also becomes larger. This relationship is explained below with reference toFIG. 7.

FIG. 7shows, by way of example, a profile of an input offset voltage. In the graph, the resulting offset which converges toward zero is plotted against time. Within prescribed limits, the offset at the output is corrected using an error whose magnitude is smaller than that current which is provided by the source24having the least significant bit. This maximum error is likewise dependent on the number of current sources and thus on the number n of bits and can therefore also be reduced even further by increasing the number of current sources and the number of bits.

Although the invention has been illustrated and described with respect to a certain aspect or various aspects, it is obvious that equivalent alterations and modifications will occur to others skilled in the art upon the reading and understanding of this specification and the annexed drawings. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described components (e.g., assemblies, devices, circuits, etc.), the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such components are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any component which performs the specified function of the described component (i.e., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the herein illustrated exemplary embodiments of the invention. In addition, while a particular feature of the invention may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several aspects of the invention, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other aspects as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising.” Also, exemplary is merely intended to mean an example, rather than the best.