Appeal type: Experimental/Investigational
Decision: Upheld

Physician 1: The patient is a 26-year-old female with degenerative disc disease at L5-S1. Artificial disc replacement has been recommended. The patient has failed conservative therapy and has persistent pain. The Health Plan has denied authorization for the requested procedure.The proposed procedure is experimental without established long-term safety and efficacy. Available data does not demonstrate an advantage to disc replacement over fusion. The long-term safety profile is unknown. There is no clinical indication demonstrating the proposed procedure is the best treatment option for this patient. There are other treatments available. For these reasons, I have determined the requested procedure is not likely to be more beneficial for treatment of the patients medical condition than any available standard therapy. Therefore, the Health Plans denial should be upheld.Physician 2: The patient is a 26-year-old female with degenerative disc disease at L5-S1. The patient is status post a surgical procedure in 1997. Her provider has recommended a single level disc replacement. The Health Plan considers this procedure experimental.The Health Plan is correct that the proposed procedure is considered experimental. There is no evidence to support disc replacement as the best available treatment for this patient. Artificial discs are currently being investigated for single level disc replacement in the treatment of degenerative disc disease in the lumbar spine. Current data for single level disc replacement demonstrates a 63% short-term success rate; however, long-term outcomes are unknown and complications may be severe. Because there is no evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of artificial disc replacement, I have determined the requested procedure is not likely to be more beneficial for treatment of the patients medical condition than any available standard therapy. Therefore, the Health Plans denial should be upheld.The proposed procedure is experimental without established long-term safety and efficacy. Available data does not demonstrate an advantage to disc replacement over fusion. The long-term safety profile is unknown. There is no clinical indication demonstrating the proposed procedure is the best treatment option for this patient. There are other treatments available. For these reasons, I have determined the requested procedure is not likely to be more beneficial for treatment of the patients medical condition than any available standard therapy. Therefore, the Health Plans denial should be upheld.Physician 3: The patient is a 26-year-old female with degenerative disc disease. The patient underwent a discography, which revealed pain at L5-S1. The patient has been tried on multiple conservative therapies without benefit. The patient wishes to undergo artificial disc replacement surgery. The Health Plan has denied coverage for the procedure on the basis it is considered experimental.The Health Plans denial should be upheld. The current clinical evidence regarding the Charite III disc has allowed for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval that it is not inferior compared to fusion. However, artificial disc replacement has not been proven to be more effective than fusion. Long-term, randomized studies are needed to determine if artificial disc replacement is superior to standard modalities. Therefore, I have determined the requested procedure is not likely to be more beneficial for treatment of the patients medical condition than any available standard therapy. The Health Plans denial should be upheld.