ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                40 CFR Part 52
                [EPAR09OAR20220795; FRL1021701R9]
                Air Plan Approval; California; Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District
                
                    AGENCY:
                    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
                
                
                    ACTION:
                    Proposed rule.
                
                
                    SUMMARY:
                    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing an approval of a revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District (YSAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvent cleaning and degreasing operations. We are proposing action on a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.
                
                
                    DATES:
                    Comments must be received on or before January 12, 2023.
                
                
                    ADDRESSES:
                    
                        Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPAR09OAR20220795 at 
                        https://www.regulations.gov.
                         For comments submitted at 
                        Regulations.gov
                        , follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
                        Regulations.gov
                        . The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (
                        i.e.,
                         on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the 
                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
                         section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit 
                        https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
                         If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please 
                        
                        contact the person identified in the 
                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
                         section.
                    
                
                
                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                    
                        Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 9723024, 
                        lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
                    
                
            
            
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                Throughout this document, we, us and our refer to the EPA.
                Table of Contents
                
                    I. The State's Submittal
                    A. What rule did the State submit?
                    B. Are there other versions of this rule?
                    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision?
                    II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
                    A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
                    B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
                    C. Proposed Action and Public Comment
                    III. Incorporation by Reference
                    IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
                
                I. The State's Submittal
                A. What rule did the State submit?
                Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the date that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).
                
                    Table 1Submitted Rule
                    
                        Local agency
                        Rule No.
                        Rule title
                        Revised
                        Submitted
                    
                    
                        YSAQMD
                        2.31
                        Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing
                        07/14/2021
                        07/18/22
                    
                
                On September 30, 2022, the submittal for YSAQMD Rule 2.31 was determined to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.
                B. Are there other versions of this rule?
                There is a previous version of Rule 2.31 in the SIP, revised on April 12, 2017, submitted to us by CARB on August 9, 2017, and finalized with a limited approval and limited disapproval into the SIP on July 30, 2021 (86 FR 40959). If we take final action to approve the July 18, 2022 version of Rule 2.31, this version will replace the previously approved version of this rule in the SIP.
                C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision?
                VOCs contribute to the production of ground-level ozone, smog, and particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that control emissions of VOCs. The purpose of Rule 2.31 is to limit the emissions of VOCs from solvent cleaning operations and solvent degreasing operations, and from the storage and disposal of materials used for such operations. The EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about this rule.
                II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
                A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
                Rules in the SIP must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193).
                
                    Generally, SIP rules must require reasonably available control technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as each major source of VOCs in ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate or above (see CAA section 182(b)(2)). The YSAQMD regulates an ozone nonattainment area classified as Severe nonattainment for the 2008 and 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS); 
                    1
                    
                     and Moderate nonattainment for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
                    2
                    
                     Therefore, this rule must implement RACT.
                
                
                    
                        1
                         (40 CFR 81.305).
                    
                
                
                    
                        2
                         Id.
                    
                
                Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:
                1. State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).
                2. Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations, EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January 11, 1990).
                3. Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies, EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
                4. Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning, EPA450/277022, November 1977.
                5. Control Technique Guidelines for Industrial Cleaning Solvents EPA453/R06001, September 2006.
                6. Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Coating Operations at Aerospace manufacturing and Rework Operations EPA453/R97004, December 1997.
                7. Control Technique Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing EPA 453/R06003, September 2006.
                B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
                Rule 2.31 improves the SIP by eliminating an exemption that was not approvable. The rule is largely consistent with CAA requirements and with relevant guidance regarding enforceability and SIP revisions. The EPA's TSD has more information regarding the EPA's analysis of this rule.
                C. Proposed Action and Public Comment
                As authorized in sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the Act, the EPA is proposing a full approval of the submitted rule. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until January 12, 2023. If finalized, this action would incorporate the submitted rule into the SIP.
                III. Incorporation by Reference
                
                    In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the YSAQMD Rule 2.31, which regulates VOC emissions from solvent cleaning and degreasing operations. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials available through 
                    www.regulations.gov
                     and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the 
                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
                     section of this preamble for more information).
                
                IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
                
                    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
                    
                    Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action:
                
                 Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
                
                     Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 
                    et seq.
                    );
                
                
                     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
                    et seq.
                    );
                
                 Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 1044);
                 Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
                 Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
                 Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
                 Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and
                 The State did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as part of its SIP submittal. There is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goals of E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and indigenous peoples.
                In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
                
                    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
                    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
                
                
                    Authority:
                    
                        42 U.S.C. 7401 
                        et seq.
                    
                
                
                    Dated: December 4, 2022.
                    Martha Guzman Aceves,
                    Regional Administrator, Region IX.
                
            
            [FR Doc. 202226763 Filed 121222; 8:45 am]
            BILLING CODE 656050P