IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome newly affects 1-3 per 100,000 children per year. Approximately 85% of cases show complete remission of proteinuria following glucocorticoid treatment. Patients who do not achieve complete remission within 4-6 weeks of glucocorticoid treatment have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). In 10-30% of steroid-resistant patients, mutations in podocyte-associated genes can be detected, whereas an undefined circulating factor of immune origin is assumed in the remaining ones. Diagnosis and management of SRNS is a great challenge due to its heterogeneous etiology, frequent lack of remission by further immunosuppressive treatment, and severe complications including the development of end-stage kidney disease and recurrence after renal transplantation. A team of experts including pediatric nephrologists and renal geneticists from the International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA), a renal pathologist, and an adult nephrologist have now developed comprehensive clinical practice recommendations on the diagnosis and management of SRNS in children. The team performed a systematic literature review on 9 clinically relevant PICO (Patient or Population covered, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions, formulated recommendations and formally graded them at a consensus meeting, with input from patient representatives and a dietician acting as external advisors and a voting panel of pediatric nephrologists. Research recommendations are also given.Pediatr Nephrol (2020) 35:1529-1561 of the members of the voting panel representing the IPNA regional societies, i.e., ESPN:

# Introduction
Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (NS), characterized by severe proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, and/or presence of edema , newly affects about 1-3 per 100,000 children aged below 16 years. Approximately 85% of cases experience complete remission of proteinuria following daily oral prednisolone/prednisone (PDN) treatment at standard doses. Those who do not achieve remission after 4-6 weeks of treatment are presumed to have steroid resistant NS (SRNS). The duration of PDN required before a patient is considered steroid-resistant is a matter of discussion and longer treatment periods , as well as additional intravenous methylprednisolone (MPDN) pulses, have been reported.
In 10-30% of patients with non-familial SRNS, mutations in podocyte-associated genes can be detected, whereas an undefined circulating factor(s) is assumed in the remaining cases. The principal histopathological entities encountered in SRNS are focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), minimal change disease (MCD), and diffuse mesangial sclerosis. Treatment usually includes inhibitors of the reninangiotensin-aldosterone system (RAASi) and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in patients with non-genetic forms of SRNS. With this approach, complete or partial remission can be achieved in 50-70% of cases. Management of SRNS is a great challenge due to its heterogeneous etiology, frequent lack of remission induced by immunosuppressive treatment, and complications including drug toxicity, infections, thrombosis, the development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and recurrence after renal transplantation. There are currently no evidence-based, systematically developed recommendations on the diagnosis and management of children with SRNS available, with the exception of a focused document from KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) Glomerulonephritis guideline. Therefore, the International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA) convened a clinical practice recommendation (CPR) workgroup in December 2018 to develop CPRs for the diagnosis and management of children with SRNS. Future research recommendations regarding key outcome measures in patients with SRNS are also presented.

# Methods

## Overview of the guideline project
We have followed the RIGHT (Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare) Statement for Practice Guidelines. Three groups were assembled: a core leadership group, an external expert group, and a voting panel. The core group comprised 18 members of IPNA, including pediatric nephrologists, renal geneticists, epidemiologists, an adult nephrologist, and a renal pathologist. The individual expertise and responsibilities of the core group members are given in. The external expert group included 3 patient representatives and one dietician. The patient representatives discussed the manuscript provided by the core group members within their local parents' association, and their suggestions were then incorporated into the manuscript. The voting panel included 23 pediatric nephrologists including 3-5 representatives of each IPNA Regional Society with expertise in the management of SRNS in children. Voting group members were asked by electronic questionnaire to provide a level of agreement on a 5-point scale (strongly disagree, disagree, neither agree/disagree, agree, strongly agree) (Delphi method). For topics that failed to achieve a 70% level of consensus, the recommendations were re-evaluated and modified by the core group and then reviewed again by the voting panel until a consensus level of > 70% was achieved.

## Developing the pico questions
We developed PICO (Patient or Population covered, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions as follows: Population: Children (> 3 months and < 18 years) with SRNS; Intervention and Comparators: treatment compared with no treatment, other treatment or placebo; Outcomes Addressed: We addressed recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of children with SRNS (including efficacy to induce remission and side effects of medications).

## Literature search
The PubMed database was searched for studies published by 15 September 2019; all systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of SRNS in children, RCTs, prospective uncontrolled trials, observational studies, and registry studies on diagnosis and treatment of children with SRNS, restricted to human studies in English. Where possible, metaanalyses of RCTs using risk ratios were cited from the updated Cochrane systematic review regarding interventions for childhood steroid resistant NS (SRNS). Further details and a summary of the publications used for this CPR are given in the Supplementary material (Supplementary Tables S2-S5).

## Grading system
We followed the grading system of the American Academy of Pediatrics ;. The quality of evidence was graded as High (A), Moderate (B), Low (C), Very low (D), or Not applicable (X). The latter refers to exceptional situations where validating studies cannot be performed because benefit or harm clearly predominates. This letter was used to grade contra-indications of therapeutic measures and safety parameters. The strength of a recommendation was graded as strong, moderate, weak, or discretionary (when no recommendation can be made).

## Limitations of the guideline process
SRNS is a rare disease. Consequently, the sizes and numbers of some RCTs were small and of poor methodological quality so most recommendations are weak to moderate. Due to the limited budget of this IPNA initiative, patient representatives and dieticians were only included as external experts.

## Clinical practice recommendations

## Definitions and diagnostic work-up
Definitions & We recommend quantification of proteinuria by protein/ creatinine ratio (UPCR) in either a first morning (AM) urine or 24-h urine sample at least once before defining a patient as SRNS and/or starting alternative immunosuppression. We suggest using this baseline value for assessment of subsequent response (grade A, strong recommendation).
& We suggest using the definitions listed infor the diagnosis and management of SRNS (grade B, moderate recommendation). & We suggest using the "confirmation period," which is the time period between 4 and 6 weeks from start of oral PDN at standard doses, to assess the response to further treatment with glucocorticoids and initiate RAASi (grade C, weak recommendation). We also recommend performing genetic testing and/or a renal biopsy at this time (grade B, moderate recommendation). & We suggest the submission of histological, clinical, and genetic data from all SRNS patients into patient registries and genetic databases to help improve our understanding of the disease and its treatment (ungraded).

## Evidence and rationale

## Assessment of proteinuria
The conventional definition of NS in children is proteinuria > 40 mg/h/m 2 or  1000 mg/m 2 /day or urinary protein creatinine ratio (UPCR)  200 mg/mmol (2 mg/mg) or 3+ on urine dipstick plus either hypoalbuminemia (< 30 g/l) or edema. Urinary dipstick analysis is useful for screening and at home monitoring of proteinuria, but therapeutic decisions should be based on at least one precise quantification of proteinuria, i.e., UPCR on a first-morning urine sample, or 24-h urine collection after treatment for > 4 weeks with full-dose PDN. Firstmorning urine samples are preferred over random spot samples to reduce the influence of orthostatic proteinuria. Given the linear relationship between UPCR in spot and 24-h urine protein, determination of UPCR is recommended. If either UPCR measurement is  200 mg/mmol (2 mg/mg), then treatment for SRNS should begin. Semiquantitative expression of dipstick results is given in .

## Definition of srns
The initial treatment of children with idiopathic NS usually comprises oral PDN 60 mg/m 2 /day or 2 mg/kg/day (maximum 60 mg/day) for 4-6 weeks, followed by 40 mg/m 2 or 1.5 mg/kg per dose on alternate days (QOD) for another 4-6 weeks. After the initial 4 weeks of full-dose oral PDN, a child can achieve complete remission (UPCR  20 mg/mmol (0.2 mg/mg) or negative or trace dipstick on three or more consecutive occasions), which confirms SSNS. If partial remission is observed, given the fact that a small percentage of children achieve complete remission if given 2 additional weeks of time, the "confirmation period" begins. During this time, responses to further daily oral PDN with or without 3 pulses of MPDN (500 mg/m 2 or 15 mg/kg), and RAASi are ascertained. If complete remission is achieved by 6 weeks, the child is defined as "late responder" SSNS and treated as SSNS. If no remission is achieved by 6 weeks, the diagnosis of SRNS is confirmed. We recommend performing a renal biopsy as well as obtaining genetic testing results (where available) as soon as possible, ideally within the 2-week confirmation period. If genetic results are not available at the end of the confirmation period, we suggest to start treatment with CNI and to reassess treatment after receiving genetic results. In the setting of low-resource countries where genetic and/or histopathology assessment is not available, immediate immunosuppressive treatment with CNI may be started. If CNI are not available intravenous or oral cyclophosphamide (CPH) may be started (vide infra). Details on evidence and rationale for these definitions are given in the Supplementary Material.

## Definition of cni-resistant nephrotic syndrome
Among those children defined as SRNS without a genetic cause, a substantial proportion will respond to CNIs in a variable amount of time (weeks to months). Children with initial Matrix for grading of evidence and assigning strength of recommendations as currently used by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Reproduced with permission fromSRNS who are CNI responders subsequently either remain in stable remission with no or infrequent relapses or may develop secondary SSNS. Resistance to CNIs is defined when a child fails to attain at least partial remission after at least 6 months of CNI treatment administered at adequate doses and blood levels.
Definition of multi-drug resistant nephrotic syndromebe performed to search for immunological or infectious causes of SRNS and to evaluate the degree of

## Relapse
Recurrence of nephrotic-range proteinuria. In children, relapse is commonly assessed by urine dipstick and is thus defined as dipstick  3+ on 3 consecutive days, or UPCR  200 mg/mmol (2 mg/mg) on a first morning urine sample, with or without reappearance of edema in a child who had previously achieved partial or complete remission.

## Cni-resistant srns
Absence of at least partial remission after 6 months of treatment with a CNI at adequate doses and/or levels.
Multi-drug-resistant SRNS Absence of complete remission after 12 months of treatment with 2 mechanistically distinct steroid-sparing agents at standard doses (see text). Secondary steroid resistance Children with initial steroid-sensitivity who in subsequent relapses develop SRNS Recurrent nephrotic syndrome post-renal transplantation A child with SRNS presenting post-renal transplantation with a relapse of nephrotic-range proteinuria in the absence of other apparent causes and/or podocyte foot process effacement on kidney biopsy. This diagnosis should also be considered in case of persistent proteinuria (UPCR  100 mg/mmol (1 mg/mg) in a previously anuric patient, or an increase of UPCR  100 mg/mmol (1 mg/mg) in a patient with prevalent proteinuria at the time of transplant in the absence of other apparent causes.
UPCR urine protein/creatinine ratio, SSNS steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome, SRNS steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, PDN prednisolone or prednisone, MPDN methylprednisolone, RAASi renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, CNI calcineurin inhibitor proteinuria, estimated GFR, and renal histology (grade B, moderate recommendation). & We suggest offering urinalysis to siblings of SRNS patients even before genetic testing is done (grade C, moderate recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Early identification of genetic forms of SRNS (listed in immunosuppressive treatment with CNI may be started. If CNI are not available intravenous or oral cyclophosphamide may be started. * = We suggest tapering PDN after CNI initiation as follows: 40 mg/m 2 QOD for 4 weeks, 30 mg/m 2 QOD for 4 weeks, 20 mg/m 2 QOD for 4 weeks, 10 mg/m 2 QOD for 8 weeks, and discontinuing thereafter; ** = CNI may be continued in case of partial remission; *** = in cases of no complete response within 4 weeks, frequent relapses or side effects of medications, we recommend following the refractory SRNS protocol; SRNS, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome; ACEi, angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin-receptor blocker; PDN, prednisolone; IV, intravenous; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil Depending on underlying disease and clinically evident extrarenal features: -Brain MRI (e.g., microcephaly, psychomotor delay, mental retardation, myoclonic epilepsy, tremor, ataxia, hypotonia) -Interdisciplinary evaluation by Ophthalmology (e.g., microcoria, cataract, glaucoma, optic atrophy, keratoconus, macular spots, lenticonus, nystagmus), -Cardiology (e.g., congenital heart defects),

## 

## If indicated
If indicated genetic testing, and/or assessment of complement C3, C4, antinuclear antibodies, anti-streptococcal antibodies, and ANCA. Later in the disease course, a low eGFR may signal progression of disease, acute kidney injury (AKI), or drug toxicity. Renal ultrasound including Doppler evaluation assists with evaluation of congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract and vascular thrombosis, which can also be a cause of proteinuria. Given the 25% risk of disease in siblings if a patient has autosomal recessive SRNS, urinalysis is advisable for siblings.

## Indications for genetic testing and renal biopsy
& We recommend, if available, that genetic testing be performed in all children diagnosed with primary SRNS (grade B, moderate recommendation). & We suggest giving priority to genetic testing in familial cases (family history of proteinuria/hematuria or CKD of unknown origin), cases with extra-renal features, and those undergoing preparation for renal transplantation (grade C, weak recommendation). & We recommend a kidney biopsy in all children diagnosed with SRNS, except in known infection or malignancyassociated secondary disease or potentially in patients with familial and/or syndromic cases or genetic causes of SRNS (grade A, strong recommendation). & We suggest genetic testing before a kidney biopsy in children with SRNS, especially in priority cases (see above), provided the results will be readily available (within few weeks) (grade D, weak recommendation). & We do not recommend performing genetic testing in patients with initial steroid sensitivity who subsequently develop steroid resistance later in their disease course (i.e., secondary steroid resistance) (grade C, moderate recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale

## Genetic testing
Genetic testing in SRNS patients (i) may provide patients and families with an unequivocal diagnosis, (ii) may uncover a form of SRNS that is amenable to treatment (e.g., coenzyme Q10), (iii) may avoid the necessity of a renal biopsy and allow early weaning of immunosuppressive therapy, (iv) may allow accurate, well-informed genetic counseling including risk of recurrence post-transplantation, and (v) may allow appropriate diagnosis and management of extrarenal manifestations. With whole exome sequencing (WES) technology, 10-30% of children are now diagnosed with a monogenic disease. Mutations in NPHS2, WT1, and NPHS1 are the most common genetic SRNS causes in European patients, accounting for 42, 16, and 13% of genetic cases, respectively. Mutations in the NPHS2 gene caused SRNS in~20-30% of sporadic Caucasian cases. The likelihood of identifying a causative mutation is inversely related to age at disease onset and is increased with either a positive family history or the presence of extrarenal manifestations, but genes commonly implicated in one population may not be common in another population. In patients with monogenic forms of SRNS, immunosuppressive treatment should be withdrawn since there is evidence supporting the ineffectiveness of this treatment.

## Renal biopsy
Renal biopsy allows the exclusion of the other differential diagnoses listed above (e.g., membranous nephropathy) and the confirmation of a primary podocytopathy (MCD, FSGS, or DMS). Moreover, it allows the detection and grading of -Endocrinology (ambiguous genitalia, delayed puberty, primary amenorrhea, pesudohermaphroditism, diabetes mellitus), -Dermatology (e.g., epidermolysis bullosa), -Orthopedics (absent or hypoplastic patella, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia), -Immunology (T cell immunodeficiency), -Hematology (thrombocytopenia with large platelets, Dohle bodies), -Audiology (sensorineural hearing loss) ALP alkaline phosphatase, PTH parathyroid hormone, CNI calcineurin inhibitor, CsA cyclosporine A, BP blood pressure, MMF mycophenolate mofetil a Anthropometric data should be compared with updated national or international (WHO chartsstandards b eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) = k height (cm)/plasma creatinine (mg/dl); where k is a constant = 0.413. In malnourished or obese patients cystatin-based equations should be usedc According to Gellerman et al.tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and glomerulosclerosis as prognostic markers. Therefore, once a child is defined as having SRNS, a renal biopsy should be performed according to current standards as described in Supplementary Material to determine the underlying pathology before initiating treatment with CNI, unless a clear monogenic form of SRNS known to be unresponsive to immunosuppression is identified. This is particularly relevant in settings where access to genetic testing is limited.
[formula] NPHS1 * AR NM_004646 CNS/SRNS NPHS2 * AR NM_014625 CNS, SRNS NUP85 AR NM_024844.5 SRNS NUP93 * AR NM_014669 Childhood SRNS NUP107 * AR NM_020401 Childhood SRNS NUP160 AR NM_015231.2 SRNS NUP205 AR NM_015135 Childhood SRNS NXF5 XR NM_032946 FSGS with co-segregating heart block disorder OCRL * XR NM_000276 Dent's disease-2, Lowe syndrome,  FSGS,  nephrotic range proteinuria OSGEP AR NM_017807.4 NS with primary microcephaly PAX2 AD NM_003987 Adult-onset FSGS without extrarenal manifestations PDSS2 AR NM_020381 Leigh syndrome PLCe1 AR NM_016341 CNS/SRNS PMM2 AR NM_000303 Congenital disorder of glycosylation PODXL * AD NM_005397 FSGS PTPRO AR NM_030667 NS SCARB2 AR NM_005506 [/formula]

## Genetic testing and counseling
& We recommend comprehensive gene panel analysis (i.e., a next generation sequencing panel to include all currently known SRNS genes, which is currently the most costeffective approach to genetic testing) (genes are listed in

## Evidence and rationale
We recommend performing genetic testing according to current standards. This includes confirmation of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants by Sanger sequencing. In cases where no causative mutations are found in known gene panels, whole exome sequencing or whole genome sequencing may be considered, especially if the suspicion of a genetic etiology is high. Caution and expertise are required in interpreting variants of unknown significance. Without genetic counseling patients and their families may not understand the significance of genetic findings.

## Screening for infections
& We recommend evaluation for subclinical tuberculosis according to country-specific guidelines (i.e., chest radiography, tuberculin test, quantiferon assay), if clinically suspected, or in case of residence in or travel from endemic areas (grade C, moderate recommendation).
& We suggest testing for hepatitis B, C, syphilis, and HIV: (i) to rule out secondary causes of NS and (ii) before immunosuppression, especially rituximab, given the endemicity of these infections in various countries (grade C, weak recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Accounting for country-specific disease prevalence and individual risk assessment, evaluations for infections causing secondary forms of SRNS should be completed.

## Treatment
First-line non-immunosuppressive treatment in children with SRNS & We recommend starting RAASi with either angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) once the diagnosis of SRNS is made(grade B, moderate recommendation). & We suggest quantifying the change in first-morning proteinuria after starting RAASi therapy (grade D, weak recommendation). & We suggest aiming for the maximum approved dosages given in as tolerated (grade C, weak recommendation). & ACEi or ARBs should be used with caution in patients with CKD stage 4, and they should not be started or should be stopped in case of intravascular volume depletion, acute kidney injury (AKI), hyperkalemia, or frequent vomiting/diarrhea (grade X, strong recommendation). & We suggest using RAASi with non-renal metabolism (i.e., ramipril and ARBs) since they do not accumulate in renal failure (grade D, weak recommendation). & In female adolescents, contraception should be ensured in order to avoid the teratogenic effects of RAASi (grade X, strong recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
In CKD patients RAAS blockade by ACEi or ARBs decreases intraglomerular pressure, decelerates progression of CKD, and reduces proteinuria . We recommend aiming for the maximum approved dosages as tolerated since dosedependent antiproteinuric effects of ACEi with reductions of 30% are expected. Complete remissions have been reported in children with SRNS after therapy with ACEi or ARBs without additional medications other than PDN. Therefore, in children with confirmed or suspected SRNS, this treatment may be commenced as early as 4 weeks from PDN initiation, during the so-called confirmation period. However, ACEi/ARBs may increase the risk for AKI, especially in patients with advanced CKD or intravascular volume depletion. Combined treatment with ACEi and ARBs is discouraged due to the increased risk for adverse events including AKI and death. Agents with non-renal metabolism should be preferred since they do not accumulate in CKD . Contraception is essential in female adolescents to avoid RAAS blocker fetopathy.(grade X, strong recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale

## Calcineurin inhibitors
The use of CNI as first-line therapy in children with SRNS was assessed in 8 RCTs comparing the efficacy of cyclosporine (CsA) with either placebo, no treatment, intravenous MPDN, MMF with dexamethasone, or tacrolimus (TAC), and CsA or TAC with intravenous CPH, on the outcome of "number with complete or partial remission" (Supplementary. When CsA was compared with placebo, no treatment, or MPDN, no differences were detected in the number of patients developing ESKD but event numbers were very small. When CNIs were compared with intravenous CPH, there was an increase in serious adverse effects with CPH, but there were no differences in persistent nephrotoxicity or death. No differences were detected in comparisons of CsA, MMF + dexamethasone, or TAC in terms of outcomes of ESKD, or 50% decline in eGFR. Treatment with CNIs is discouraged in patients with reduced eGFR, AKI, and/or uncontrolled hypertension due to their nephrotoxic effects. However, in patients with chronic CKD and no other option for disease control, CNIs may improve proteinuria and long-term kidney survival.
SRNS patients who do not show at least partial remission to CNI by 6 months are deemed CNI resistant, and those who do not respond to CNI plus another agent that is mechanistically distinct by 12 cumulative months of therapy as multi-drug resistant (vide supra). If a monogenic form of SRNS known not to respond to immunosuppression is identified in a patient and no response to immunosuppression has previously been observed in the patient, then immunosuppression should be discontinued. We suggest that patients in these categories remain off immunosuppression but continue on RAASi therapy until they reach advanced stages of CKD and can no longer tolerate RAASi.

## Alkylating agents and low resource settings
When compared with PDN/placebo, CPH showed no difference in the outcome of complete remission (risk ratio 1.06 95% CI 0.61-1.87). Overall, 36% children on CPH compared with 35% on PDN achieved complete remission. Similar remission rates were noted in patients receiving intravenous or oral CPH (each~50%). The response to CPH reported in some observational studies may indicate a certain overlap of SSNS and SRNS. Older studies may have included children with monogenic causes of NS, given that genetic testing was not commonly available for patients before 2000-2010 resulting in low response rates to CPH. CPH may be trialed to induce remission in resource-limited settings, but should be stopped in case of achieving no-response. Since chlorambucil was not evaluated in any RCTs, we make no suggestions for its use.

## Evidence and rationale
Although monitoring of CsA at 2 h post dose (C2) is the most accurate single time point for assessment for therapeutic level, C2 target levels in SRNS patients are not widely established or practical for routine use. Instead, whole blood trough measurements by tandem mass spectrometry are recommended. These assays give lower readings than immunoassays, which were previously used. The ranges of CsA levels reported in RCTs vary widely. More recent studies use lower levels of CsA (troughs of 80-150 ng/ml), with an initial starting dose of 5-6 mg/kg/day. Since, even low CsA trough levels can be associated with long-term nephrotoxicity in children with NS, we suggest targeting CsA trough levels of 80-120 ng/ml, although higher levels may be more effective but should be analyzed together with serum creatinine as a safety parameter. High dosages of CsA (C2 levels > 600 ng/ml) showed increased risk for CsA nephrotoxicity especially when given in combination with ACEis/ARBs in children with SDNS. Levels should be monitored weekly until steady state and then every 1-3 months.

## Duration of cni treatment
& We suggest a minimum treatment period of 6 months to determine the response to CNIs (grade B, weak recommendation). & We recommend that CNIs should be stopped if partial remission is not achieved at 6 months (grade B, moderate recommendation). & If complete remission is achieved, CNI dosages should be reduced to the lowest dosage required to maintain remission. We also suggest considering discontinuation of CNIs after 12-24 months in these patients to reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity (grade C, weak recommendation). In these patients, switching to MMF can be considered to minimize nephrotoxicity and maintain remission (vide infra). & If relapses occur after CNI discontinuation, we suggest restarting patients on CNIs for a trial together with 4 weeks of high-dose oral PDN. Alternately MMF or may be considered (grade C, weak recommendation). & If partial remission is achieved, we suggest continuing CNI at the same dosage for a minimum of 12 months (grade C, weak recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Due to the risk of nephrotoxicity and side effects related to long-term immunosuppression (see, CNIs should be discontinued after 6 months if at least a partial remission is not achieved. If complete remission is achieved, we suggest considering discontinuation of CNIs after 12-24 months. See "Treatment of relapse" for relapse therapy.

## Mycophenolate mofetil
& If immunosuppression is considered in a child with SRNS and an eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , we suggest that MMF rather than CNIs be used due to the risk for nephrotoxicity with CNI (grade C, weak recommendation). & We suggest considering the use of MMF to maintain remission in children with SRNS in remission following CNI if they develop a steroid sensitive relapse (grade C, weak recommendation). & In patients with SRNS who have attained full remission on CNI therapy for at least 12 months, we suggest considering conversion to MMF as an alternative immunosuppressive agent rather than continuing CNIs (grade C, weak recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
If immunosuppression is considered in a child with SRNS and an eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , then MMF may be used to avoid CNI nephrotoxicity. CsA was not superior in achieving remission when compared with MMF in combination with dexamethasone (45% vs. 33%). When a child with SRNS achieves remission following CNI therapy but subsequently has a steroid sensitive relapse, then based on RCTs evaluating MMF in relapsing SSNS, MMF may be used to maintain remission. The rationale to switch to a CNIfree immunosuppressive protocol is to avoid long-term CNI toxicity. A CNI-to-MMF conversion protocol was applied successfully in children with SRNS after a mean of 1.7 years of CNI therapy with regular drug monitoring. However, in an RCT conversion from TAC to MMF was shown to be inferior to maintain remission in patients achieving remission by TAC. We suggest a MMF starting dose of 1200 mg/m 2 per day, and performing therapeutic drug monitoring in SRNS patients aiming for a mycophenolic acid exposure (AUC) > 50 g  h/ml based on the results in SSNS patients.

## Repeat kidney biopsy
& If there is an unexplained drop in eGFR or increase in proteinuria during follow-up, we suggest considering a repeat kidney biopsy for assessment of CNI nephrotoxicity (grade C, weak recommendation). & We suggest considering a renal biopsy in those patients who have prolonged CNI exposure (> 2 years) or when being restarted on CNI-treatment for a second course (grade C, weak recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
An unexplained eGFR decrease or an increase in proteinuria may be due to disease progression or drug toxicity, especially in patients on long-term CNI treatment. The latter is supported in the presence of arteriolar hyalinization and smooth muscle vacuolization, ischemic glomerular collapse, juxtaglomerular apparatus hyperplasia, (striped) interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy on light microscopy, and mitochondrial damage on transmission electron microscopy.

## Co-intervention with glucocorticoids
& We do not recommend prolonged (> 6 months) routine PDN treatment in conjunction with CNI and RAASi (grade C, moderate recommendation) & We suggest tapering PDN after CNI initiation as follows: 40 mg/m 2 QOD for 4 weeks, 30 mg/m 2 QOD for 4 weeks, 20 mg/m 2 QOD for 4 weeks, 10 mg/m 2 QOD for 8 weeks, and discontinuing thereafter (grade D, weak recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Prednisone was used as a co-intervention in several RCTs. The dose and duration of PDN ranged from 1 mg/kg/day for 6 months QOD to 0.3 mg/kg/day for 6 months. There is no evidence that prolonged treatment with oral PDN is beneficial in SRNS patients but may cause steroid toxicity; therefore, we suggest a gradual reduction of PDN using the regimen suggested above,. PDN may be weaned off more quickly especially in patients presenting with glucocorticoid toxicity. However, this does not apply to a proportion of SRNS patients who achieve complete remission with CNI and subsequently behave as SDNS patients. These patients may be treated accordingly with additional low-dose alternate day oral PDN.

## Second-line approaches
& Patients with SRNS who fail to achieve at least partial remission with CNIs (and who do not have genetic or syndromic disease) should be approached for participation in a clinical trial evaluating novel potential therapies for SRNS (ungraded). & If a clinical trial is not available, the use of rituximab may be considered (grade C, weak recommendation). & We suggest administering two rituximab infusions at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 per infusion in order to reduce the CD19 cell count below 5 per microliter or 1% (usually 1-2 infusions within 2 weeks) (grade C, weak recommendation). & Rituximab should not be given in the presence of tuberculosis, hepatitis B, or JC virus infections. In case of clinical suspicion and endemic background, patients should undergo screening by a chest X-ray, tuberculosis skin or blood test, HBs-Ag serology in case of elevated liver enzymes, and spinal fluid examination in case of neurological symptoms suggesting JC virus infection before commencing rituximab (grade X, strong recommendation). & In rituximab-resistant or rituximab-intolerant patients, the use of ofatumumab and extracorporeal blood purification therapies such as plasma exchange, immunoadsorption, or lipid apheresis may be considered (grade C, weak recommendation)

## Evidence and rationale
Observational studies showed complete remissions in~30% of patients treated with rituximab as a rescue therapy for multidrug-resistant SRNS. However, rituximab was not superior compared with treatment protocols including plasma exchange and immunoadsorption. In most studies, patients with multidrug-resistant SRNS received rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 per infusion, and 1-2 infusions over 2 weeks were usually sufficient to reduce the CD19 cell count below 5 per microliter or 1% of lymphocyte count. In patients achieving partial or complete remission, first-AM proteinuria and B cell counts should be monitored and a second course of rituximab be administered when proteinuria increases substantially after B cell reconstitution (CD19 cell count > 5 per microliter or 1% of lymphocyte count). Contraindications for rituximab include hepatitis B, tuberculosis, or JC virus infections. Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and completion of age appropriate vaccination schedule is recommended (see sections Antibiotic prophylaxis and Vaccination). Serum levels of IgG should be monitored after rituximab treatment as they were found to be low in~30% of patients.
In several small pediatric studies, rituximab-resistant or rituximab-intolerant cases as well as patients without rituximab pretreatment reportedly underwent complete remission with the alternative CD20 cell-depleting agent ofatumumab. Ofatumumab was administered in two studies at an initial dose of 300 mg/1.73 m 2 (max 300 mg) followed by 5 weekly doses of 2000 mg/1.73 m 2 (max 2000 mg)and in a single case report 750 mg/1.73 m 2.
Various pharmacological and extracorporeal therapies have been applied experimentally in patients with multidrug resistant SRNS. Partial or complete remission has been observed in individual case reports or in a few cases within small series of patients receiving plasmapheresis, plasma exchange, immunoadsorption, lipid apheresis, the B7-1 inhibitor abatacept, and oral galactose. Inclusion of patients in clinical trials testing these and other novel therapies is strongly encouraged (ongoing studies are listed here: https:// kidneyhealthgateway.com/trials-research/). The genetic variant(s) should be reviewed to confirm whether it is indeed pathogenic or likely pathogenic (grade A, strong recommendation). A decision to continue or discontinue immunosuppression should follow parental counseling regarding the anticipated benefits of remission (symptomatic relief; potentially lower risk of disease progression) versus the potential risks (therapy related toxicity; infections) and cost of therapy (grade A, strong recommendation).

## Withdrawing immunosuppression in non-responsive patients

## Evidence and rationale
Non-response is associated with rapid progression to ESKD. In patients with genetic forms of SRNS, low rates of complete (2.7-3.0%) or partial response (10.8-16%) to immunosuppression were reported. Patients with genetic forms of SRNS progress to ESKD more often than those without inherited defects (71-74% vs. 4-29%) and show shorter median renal survival (45-48 months vs. 58-205 months). Given the likelihood of harm versus benefit, we suggest withdrawing immunosuppression in nonresponsive monogenic SRNS patients. In those with defects in the COQ pathway, COQ10 supplementation may be considered. While the probability of response to experimental therapies is low in patients with multi-drug-resistant disease, therapy could be contemplated after direct counseling of patients and parents about the low likelihood of benefit, and the possibility of toxicity with such therapies.

## Additional measures to reduce symptoms and control edema
Salt & We suggest that excessive salt intake should be avoided in children with SRNS(grade C, weak recommendation). & When available, a dietician should provide advice to patients and families on suitable low-salt foods and on the high-salt foods to avoid (grade D, weak recommendation).

## Fluid
& We do not recommend routine fluid restriction in SRNS patients (grade C, weak recommendation). & We suggest a balanced fluid intake taking into account the urine output, volume status, and serum sodium (grade C, weak recommendation).

## Diuretics
& We suggest considering treatment with loop diuretics (e.g., furosemide) in patients with severe edema. In patients with refractory edema, the addition of metolazone, thiazides, or potassium sparing diuretics may also be considered (grade C, moderate recommendation). & Diuretics should not be given to patients with signs of intravascular volume depletion including prolonged capillary refill time, tachycardia, hypotension, and oliguria due to the risk of thrombosis and AKI (grade X, strong recommendation).

## Albumin infusions
& We suggest treating patients with refractory edema (pericardial/pleural effusions, anasarca, genital edema) and/or symptomatic hypovolemia or with prerenal crisis (oliguria due to intravascular volume depletion) with human albumin infusions (grade C, moderate recommendation). & We suggest a starting dose of 20-25% albumin of 0.5-1 g/kg body weight given intravenously over a period of 4-8 h, and adding furosemide (1-2 mg/kg given i.v.) in the middle and/or at the end of the infusion (grade C, weak recommendation). & Children receiving albumin infusions should initially be monitored with blood pressure and heart rate measurements every 30 min, and the infusion slowed or ceased if they develop any symptoms suggestive of vascular overload (grade X, strong recommendation).
Protein & There is insufficient evidence to recommend an increased protein intake in SRNS patients (ungraded).

## Evidence and rationale
Severe edema in NS may be associated with either intravascular volume contraction ("underfilled patient") or volume expansion ("overfilled patient"). Therefore, all measures should be tailored according to the degree of edema and intravascular volume status. Clinical indicators for intravascular volume depletion are peripheral vasoconstriction (prolonged capillary refill time), tachycardia, hypotension, and oliguria, in the setting of urinary sodium retention (fractional sodium excretion (FeNa) < 0.2%). In contrast, hypertension and a FeNa > 0.2% would suggest an overfilled patient.

## Salt
According to the "underfilled" and "overfilled" hypotheses edema formation in idiopathic NS is thought to be associated with salt retention and/or diminished excretion of salt. Consequently, a strict dietary restriction of sodium intake < 2 mEq/kg/day (< 35 mg/kg/day) was proposed for children with NS. However, such a strong sodium restriction seems not to be feasible in children and may not be required in many patients. Therefore, instead of an upper limit, we recommend avoiding excessive salt intake depending on the degree of edema. This usually requires dietary advice-from a dietician.

## Fluid
General restriction of fluids to two-thirds of maintenance have been suggested in children with NS [7111]. However, this may put patients, who already have intravascular volume depletion ("underfilled patient") despite the presence of concomitant edema, at risk for symptomatic hypovolemia. Therefore, we do not recommend routine fluid restriction in SRNS patients. Instead, we suggest a balanced fluid intake taking into account urine output, volume status, and serum sodium (low serum sodium suggests fluid overload). Patients should avoid salty foods, as they increase thirst.

## Diuretics
Treatment of severe edema in children with NS with diuretics alone is safe and effective in the presence of volume expansion ("overfilled patient"), whereas aggressive treatment with diuretics carries the risk of intravascular hypovolemia, AKI, and thrombosis in "underfilled patients". Therefore, we suggest considering treatment with diuretics (preferably loop diuretics) in patients with severe edema only when intravascular volume depletion has been excluded based on the abovementioned clinical indicators. Combination therapy with metolazone, thiazides, or potassium sparing diuretics including the epithelial sodium channel blocker amiloride and the aldosterone antagonist spironolactone can enhance diuresis as compared with a loop diuretic alone and should be considered in patients with refractory edema. However, patients need to be carefully monitored to avoid severe hypokalemia or hyperkalemia, volume depletion and alkalosis. Since furosemide has a short duration of action (t 1/2 6 h) and great variation in oral bioavailability (10-100%), it should be administered at least twice daily as oral doses or intravenously if the diuretic response is poor.

## Albumin infusions
Albumin infusions in combination with loop diuretics increase diuresis via improved oncotic pressure and renal hemodynamics in patients with severe refractory edema, especially when used in "underfilled patients". However, they work only transiently, and are associated with allergic reactions, respiratory failure, and congestive heart failure, especially when given too rapidly, used in "overfilled patients," and patients with oliguria. Therefore, careful assessment of the patient's intravascular volume status and urine output is mandatory. Dosages up to 1 g/kg given as 20-25% albumin over a period of at least 4 h are thought to be safe. We suggest restricting albumin infusions to patients with severe edema (pericardial/ pleural effusions, anasarca, genital edema), symptomatic hypovolemia, or with prerenal crisis. Adding furosemide in the middle and/or at the end of the infusion enhances the diuretic response.

## Protein intake
Hypoalbuminemia is associated with several complications in SRNS including thrombosis and risk of AKI, but there is no evidence that increased oral protein intake improves serum albumin levels or patient outcome.

## Recommendations for lifestyle
& We recommend supporting physical activity and a healthy nutrition in children with SRNS and adapting to the patient's ability and stage of CKD. We recommend advising against smoking (grade C, moderate recommendation)

## Evidence and rationale
Patients with SRNS have an increased risk for cardiovascular diseaseand impaired bone health. Therefore, regular physical activity; refraining from smoking, vaping, or substance use; and a healthy nutrition as in the general population are recommended. Nutrition should be guided by a dietician allowing adequate energy intake and avoiding high salt (vide supra) or phosphorus intake and adapted to the child's age or height age in short children, and stage of CKD. Eating home-prepared meals using fresh ingredients instead of canned, frozen, or packaged meals are preferred, since the latter has a much higher content of salt and inorganic phosphorus which is up to 100% absorbed by the intestine.

## Monitoring and management of complications of ns and side effects of medications

## Monitoring of complications
& We recommend monitoring for complications of the persistent NS and medication side effects (see(grade B, moderate recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Disease-related complications include infections, hypogammaglobulinemia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, venous thromboembolism, vitamin D deficiency, growth failure, obesity, malnutrition, AKI, and CKD. Potential side effects of medications are shown in, and primary outcome parameters for use in registries/studies are shown in .

## Interventions-prevention and treatment
Hypogammaglobulinemia-immunoglobulin substitution & We suggest that immunoglobulin substitution be considered in cases of low serum IgG levels AND recurrent and/ or severe infections (grade D, weak recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Arguments against routine IgG substitution in patients with low IgG include (a) the rapid urinary loss following infusion, (b) commercial immunoglobulin preparations contain low IgG titers against bacteria mainly responsible for the septic episodes (staphylococci, streptococci, gram-negative bacteria), and (c) the high costs. We thus suggest considering prophylactic IgG substitution as in other cases of secondary hypogammaglobulinemia in patients presenting with recurrent and/or severe infections.

## Evidence and rationale
Although 60% of NS-associated deaths are attributable to infection, there is no evidence to recommend antibiotic prophylaxis in children with SRNS. Thirty to 50% of infections were due to pneumococcal infection, with the rest are due to gram-negative bacilli principally E. coli. It was estimated that 110 children would need to be treated for 1 year to prevent 1 pneumococcal peritonitis. Given the high mortality of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, we suggest to administer cotrimoxazole in patients on rituximab therapy for a period of 3 up to 6 months depending on B cell recovery and use of additional immunosuppressive comedications. Prophylactic cotrimoxazole dosing is recommend with 5-10 mg TMP/kg/day or 150 mg TMP/ m 2 /day in infants (at least 4 weeks of age) and children, given as single daily dose or in two divided doses every 12 h 3 times weekly (on consecutive or alternate days) with a maximum TMP dose of 320 mg/day . The oral dosing in adolescents is 80 to 160 mg TMP daily or 160 mg TMP 3 times per week. Whereas a 50% dose reduction of cotrimoxazole is required when eGFR < 30 ml/m 2 / min, use of cotrimoxazole is not recommend with eGFR < 15 ml/m 2 /min. In those cases, an alternative option may be prophylactic aerosolized pentamidin, but there is insufficient evidence in the efficacy.

## Vaccination
& We recommend reviewing the child's vaccination status at disease onset and completing all vaccinations without delay, especially for encapsulated bacteria (pneumococcal, meningococcal, Haemophilus influenzae) and, if possible, varicella-zoster virus (grade A, strong recommendation). & We suggest administering inactivated influenza vaccine annually (grade A, strong recommendation). & We recommend following national vaccination guidelines for the administration of inactive and live attenuated vaccines in immunocompromised patients (grade A, strong recommendation) & Live vaccines should not be given in SRNS patients on daily immunosuppressive medication including CNIs, MMF, and PDN (grade X, strong recommendation).

## Prevention of varicella infection
& We recommend treating susceptible patients (i.e., those not or inadequately immunized to varicella and exposed to chickenpox) with varicella-zoster immunoglobulin (VZIG) (grade A, strong recommendation). & If VZIG is not available, we suggest treatment with oral acyclovir (10 mg/kg QID for 7 days) within 7-10 days of exposure (grade C, moderate recommendation). & We recommend varicella vaccine should be administered to unimmunized patients in remission and not on immunosu ppres sive medic ations (gr ade A, stro ng recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Varicella infection can be life threatening in children with SRNS. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved VZIG for reducing chickenpox symptoms in susceptible patients, i.e., those not immunized and having no history of chickenpox. VZIG should be given as soon as possible up to 10 days post-exposure. Unfortunately, VZIG is not readily available in most countries. Two small studies in 52 immuno-competent children and one in 8 children with renal disease on corticosteroids suggest that administration of acyclovir reduces the risk of chickenpox when given within 7-10 days after exposure and continued for 7 days. Once in remission and not on immunosuppressive medications, varicella vaccine should be administered in unimmunized patients and family members.

## Prevention of thrombosis

## Evidence and rationale
A 3% incidence of thromboembolic events has been reported in children with NS (summarized in. Risk factors include disease-related hypercoagulability, underlying thrombophilic predisposition, infections , and treatment, e.g., central venous lines. In all SRNS children, baseline coagulation tests (stated inshould be performed during the initial workup. We suggest extending the thrombophilic screening in patients with high-risk (previous thrombotic events or known hereditary thrombotic predisposition) by screening for hereditary deficiencies of anticoagulant proteins (e.g., protein C, protein S, and antithrombin) and singlenucleotide polymorphisms in the prothrombin (factor II G20210A) and factor V genes (factor V G1691A). We also suggest considering preventive anticoagulation with low-molecular weight heparin in SRNS patients at high thrombotic risk for the short term, with vitamin K antagonists for the long term.

## Evidence and rationale
Prolonged hyper-/dyslipidemia complicates persistent NS and is a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity, but data to guide antihyperlipidemic treatment in children are scarce.
Uncontrolled studies in children with NS showed a reduction in LDL and total cholesterol levels by 30-40% using a combination of statins and lifestyle changes, but a RCT in children with SRNS showed no significant reduction in lipid levels. Given the high cardiovascular morbidity associated with dyslipidemia, we suggest considering lipid-lowering treatment in children with SRNS and persistent LDLcholesterol levels > 130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/l), starting with lifestyle changes, including dietary modifications, enhanced physical activity and weight control. There is no evidence to recommend the use of lipid-lowering statins in NS. Some experts suggest considering statins when fasting LDLcholesterol is persistently > 160 mg/dl (4.1 mmol/l)or earlier (> 130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/l)), in case of additional cardiovascular risk factors.

## Evidence and rationale
Children with SRNS have urinary losses of vitamin-D binding protein and 25-dihydroxyvitamin D and may develop vitamin D deficiency leading to hypocalcemia, hyperparathyroidism, and impaired bone mineralization. Vitamin D supplementation in these patients is effective , and recommended as in other CKD patients. CNI treatment may cause hypomagnesemia causing leg cramps. Administering oral magnesium will avoid symptomatic hypomagnesemic episodes.

## Thyroid hormone replacement
& We recommend substituting levothyroxine (T4) in case of hypothyroidism (grade A, strong recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Hypothyroidism in children with SRNS is a result of urinary loss of thyroxine-binding proteins. Therefore, TSH and free T4 levels should be regularly monitored in patients with persistently high-grade proteinuria. For those children with TSH levels > 10 mU/l and low free T4, we recommend treating with levothyroxine (T4). In asymptomatic children with TSH elevations of 4.5-10 mU/l and normal free T4, thyroid function can be monitored periodically and the indication for treatment re-evaluated.

## Treatment of hypertension and ckd-associated complications
& We recommend treatment of hypertension and CKDassociated complications such as anemia, metabolic acidosis, and hyperparathyroidism, according to current guidelines (grade A, strong recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Children with SRNS have a significantly increased risk for cardiovascular disease. As in any child with CKD, high blood pressure (> 95th age-sex and height specific percentile) should be treated aiming for blood pressure values < 75th percentile in children without proteinuria, and < 50th percentile in children with proteinuria. Other CKDassociated complications should be treated according to current guidelines.

## Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of relapsing srns in native kidneys

## Prevention of relapse
& No clinical or histological parameters at initial clinical presentation are available to predict relapsing SRNS (ungraded).

## Evidence and rationale
It is unknown to what degree medications should be tapered or discontinued once remission is achieved. Relapse occurred in up to 70% of those responding to CNI therapy after discontinuation at 6 or 12 months. We recommend continuing immunosuppressive therapy with CNI or MMF after remission over a period of at least 1 year. Gradual reduction of CNI/MMF instead of abrupt stopping may prevent an early relapse.

## Treatment of relapse
Relapse on CNI treatment & We recommend adherence to CNIs be monitored using serum trough levels according to the monitoring schedule shown in(grade C, moderate recommendation) & We suggest administering oral PDN 60 mg/m 2 daily until remission is achieved or for a maximum period of 4 weeks, with subsequent taper when remission is achieved (grade C, weak recommendation). & In case of no response, frequent relapses, or side effects of medications, we recommend following the refractory SRNS protocol (see "Second-line approaches") (ungraded).

## Relapse post withdrawal of immunosuppressive treatment
& We suggest giving oral PDN (60 mg/m 2 daily) until remission is achieved or for a maximum period of 4 weeks, with subsequent taper when remission is achieved. Alternatively, we suggest restarting the immunosuppressive agent, which was able to prevent, relapses (grade D, weak recommendation). & In cases of no complete response within 4 weeks, frequent relapses or side effects of medications, we recommend following the refractory SRNS protocol (see "Second-line approaches") (ungraded).

## Evidence and rationale

## Relapsing srns and role of steroids
Several studies have shown the effectiveness of PDN in relapsing SRNS at 2 mg/kg/day to induce remissionwith a change to QOD PDN, followed by tapering until the end of month 6. Intravenous MPDN was also effective in inducing remission in relapsing patients. Re-starting non-glucocorticoid medications which were effective in the particular patient is also reasonable.

## Management of children with eskd

## Evidence and rationale
Preparation for transplantation ideally requires the resolution of NS to minimize the risk for venous thromboembolism and improve the accuracy of monitoring for posttransplant recurrence. If adequate resolution of proteinuria does not occur after the initiation of dialysis based on 24-h urine protein, we suggest considering medical or surgical nephrectomies. However, the benefits of residual kidney function and urine output in facilitating dialysis should also be considered.

## Selection of transplant recipients

## Evidence and rationale
Factors associated with post-transplant recurrence of SRNS are non-genetic vs. monogenic forms of SRNS (recurrence 24% vs. 0% in Brazilian cohortand 50% vs. 7% in European cohort; initial steroid resistance vs. sensitivity (OR 30, 95% CI 6.6-135.9); time to ESKD < 48 vs. > 4 8 m o n t h s ( O R 11 . 7 , 9 5 % C I 1 . 5 3 -8 9 . 1 ) a n d glomerulosclerosis percentage < 55% at renal biopsy (OR 16, 95% CI 1.45-1.76). Children with a history of SRNS recurrence in a prior transplant have a > 80% likelihood of recurrence in a subsequent transplant. Complete and partial remission has been reported in 63% and 8% of patients with recurrent NS post-transplant with a 10 years allograft survival of 50%.

## Selection of transplant donors

## Evidence and rationale
Living-related kidney donation in the context of genetic kidney diseases should follow detailed donor evaluation, careful review of pattern of disease inheritance, and genetic counseling and testing. While a family history of a genetic kidney disease with an autosomal recessive (AR) mode of inheritance is not considered a contraindication for living kidney donation, long-term follow-up data are lacking. In cases where SRNS follows an autosomal dominant (AD) mode of inheritance, donation from living related donors from the side of family with affected members is discouraged. If it remains uncertain whether the donor candidate has a genetic kidney disease and whether the disease can cause CKD, donation should proceed only after informing the donor candidate of the risks of donation if the disease manifests later in life. Hemizygous carriers (mothers and sisters) of COL4A5 defects should be dissuaded from kidney donation, since they are known to develop ESKD. Similar advice should be given to donors with pathogenic heterozygous defects in other COL4A . Further, the risk to donors carrying heterozygous NPHS2 mutations may be modified by variants such as R229Q, which are considered to have a dominant-negative variant that might theoretically pose risk to the donor. Tests including evaluation of proteinuria and hematuria done as part of the donor assessment should be interpreted with special consideration in the setting of familial SRNS. If genetic evaluation of the potential donor is normal but the family history is positive, donation should proceed only after a full informed consent.

## Evidence and rationale
Similar proportions of patients with recurrence were observed among living versus deceased allografts (10-50% vs. 3-45%), but allograft survival was superior in living donor allografts with recurrent FSGS compared with deceased donor allografts.
Withholding transplantation from patients who have previously recurred & We recommend, discouraging living related donation for recipients who have had disease recurrence in the first transplant (grade B, moderate recommendation). & Deceased donor transplant may be offered to potential recipients with a history of prior allograft loss to recurrence of NS, particularly if dialysis is difficult to sustain, or associated with life-threatening events, serious infections, poor growth, and/or low quality of life (grade C, weak recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Transplantation should not be delayed in SRNS patients, since this does not reduce the recurrence risk . Recurrence in first allograft indicates a 60-80% risk of recurrence in subsequent allografts . Strategies used to manage recurrent disease (high-dose CNI, intravenous MPDN, rituximab; and extracorporeal therapies) induced remission in~60% of cases. While a few reports suggest that early diagnosis and aggressive therapy of recurrent disease may result in outcomes comparable to those in allografts without recurrence, outcomes after recurrence are usually poor for patients who do not respond to interventions . Therefore, repeat transplants from living donors are discouraged in the setting of prior SRNS disease recurrence and deceased donor transplantation, rather than dialysis, is considered ethically appropriate.

## Prevention of recurrence after renal transplantation
& There is insufficient evidence to recommend intervention strategies for the prevention of recurrence in children undergoing a first kidney transplant (ungraded). & We s u g g e s t p r o p h y l a c t i c p l a s m a p h e r e s i s o r immunoadsorption or lipid apheresis and perioperative rituximab for use in children with a history of allograft loss due to NS recurrence in a prior transplant (grade C, weak recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
There are no proven preventative strategies to reduce the likelihood of recurrence in SRNS patients undergoing the first renal transplantation. Preventative strategies for SRNS recurrence in primary, non-genetic SRNS with a history of SRNS recurrence within 1 year of transplant were shown to be effective in case reports and small series including 8 patients. They include prophylactic plasmapheresis three times weekly for 2 weeks, beginning 1 week prior to living donor transplant or within 1 day of deceased donor transplant with 1.5 plasma volume exchanges and rituximab peri-operatively or immediately after transplant with/or without a second dose posttransplant day 7 .
Transplant recurrence (as defined in& We recommend surveillance for recurrence beginning on the day of kidney transplantation by monitoring UPCR, continued daily throughout the initial transplant hospitalization, and then continued periodically (e.g., weekly for 4 weeks, monthly for 1 year, then quarterly thereafter) (grade C, moderate recommendation).
& We suggest in a previously anuric patient, post-transplant UPCR  100 mg/mmol (1 mg/mg) may be indicative of early recurrence, infection, or other diagnoses and requires evaluation (grade C, weak recommendation). & We suggest in a patient with prevalent proteinuria at the time of transplant, an increase of UPCR  100 mg/mmol (1 mg/mg) may be indicative of early recurrence, infection or other diagnoses and requires evaluation (grade C, weak recommendation). & We suggest that early onset acute tubular necrosis or graft non-function/dysfunction should be regarded as first signs of recurrence (grade C, weak recommendation). & We suggest that an allograft biopsy is not required to diagnose rapid recurrence of NS as defined in, but allograft biopsy is recommended for the exclusion of differential diagnosis in the setting of subnephrotic proteinuria, recurrence after 48 h, or in the setting of delayed graft function (grade B, moderate recommendation). & We suggest that a diagnostic evaluation precede adjustments of immunosuppression therapy in the setting of late NS recurrence (> 3 months post-transplant) including assessment of infection, donor-specific antibodies serologies, and histopathology including electron microscopy (grade B, moderate recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Nephrotic syndrome may recur as early as within 24 h after transplantation and is indicated by a UPCR ratio  100 mg/ mmol (1 mg/mg) in a previously anuric patient. Early onset acute tubular necrosis (ATN) or graft non-function/dysfunction should be considered as a first sign of transplant recurrence. A diagnosis of FSGS recurrence can be inferred on renal biopsy with diffuse foot process effacement in the absence of other histopathological findings, even if the glomerular scar defining FSGS is not present. Late-onset or insidious proteinuria requires a renal biopsy for the exclusion of the differential diagnoses including de novo TMA and antibody-mediated rejection with transplant glomerulopathy, since both can show secondary FSGS.

## Treatment of recurrence
& We recommend implementing NS recurrence-specific therapy as soon as possible after diagnosis is established (grade X, strong recommendation). & We suggest applying increasing doses of CNI, intravenous M P D N p u l s e s , a n d / o r p l a s m a p h e r e s i s ( o r immunoadsorption) with or without rituximab (grade C, weak recommendation). & We suggest initiating RAASi when no complete remission is achieved following recurrence targeted therapy (grade C, weak recommendation).

## Evidence and rationale
Strategies used to manage recurrent disease including high-dose CNI, intravenous MPDN, rituximab, and extracorporeal blood purification induced remission in~60% of transplant recurrence . We suggest in patients, treated with rituximab, to administer a second dose of rituximab (375 mg/m 2 ) in the setting of incomplete B cell depletion and/or recurrence of proteinuria.
Funding information Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL. The International Pediatric Nephrology Association launched, organized, and funded this initiative, which included travel and accommodation costs for the core group members. The funder had no influence on the content of the guideline.

## Compliance with ethical standards
Competing interests D.H. has received research grants from Kyowa Kirin and Amgen, and has received speaker and/or consultant fees from Amgen, Sandoz, Kyowa Kirin, Pfizer, Merck Serono, Horizon, and Chiesi. O.B. has received speaker and/or consultant fees from Amgen, Chiesi, Novartis, and Octapharma. These were all unrelated to the topic of this guideline. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.