Do not do in COPD: consensus statement on overuse

 [bib_ref] Setting a research agenda for medical overuse, Morgan [/bib_ref] [bib_ref] Academic physicians' views on low-value services and the choosing wisely campaign: a..., Bishop [/bib_ref] [bib_ref] Choosing Wisely: how the UK intends to reduce harmful medical overuse, Wise [/bib_ref] [bib_ref] Prevalence of COPD in Spain: impact of undiagnosed COPD on quality of..., Miravitlles [/bib_ref] [bib_ref] Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age..., Lozano [/bib_ref] [bib_ref] BOLD Collaborative Research Group, the EPI-SCAN Team, the PLATINO Team, and the..., Bernd [/bib_ref] 

# Introduction
Overuse of resources for diagnosis and therapy puts patients at risk without providing sufficient clinical benefit. Moreover, overuse has cost implications and has been linked to errors in clinical treatment. [bib_ref] Setting a research agenda for medical overuse, Morgan [/bib_ref] We must seek to eliminate practices that run contrary to existing evidence; these include carrying out procedures that do not add value for the patient and/or subject patients to unnecessary risk and failing to take actions that have been shown to produce favorable patient outcomes.
Reports in the literature have described this phenomenon using the terms "overuse," "overdiagnosis," "overmedicalization," and "low-value care." [bib_ref] Setting a research agenda for medical overuse, Morgan [/bib_ref] [bib_ref] Academic physicians' views on low-value services and the choosing wisely campaign: a..., Bishop [/bib_ref] According to the definition of the Institute of Medicine, overuse consists of providing healthcare when there is no evidence in support of such decisions or when the benefit of the treatment fails to outweigh its risk. [bib_ref] Setting a research agenda for medical overuse, Morgan [/bib_ref] Overuse has been linked to unsafe, inappropriate, and/or inefficient care. [bib_ref] Setting a research agenda for medical overuse, Morgan [/bib_ref] To counter this trend, the movement called "Less is more medicine" has taken hold in recent years. [bib_ref] Academic physicians' views on low-value services and the choosing wisely campaign: a..., Bishop [/bib_ref] Driven by scientific societies, medical associations and institutions, and healthcare authorities across different countries, in recent years there has been a growing effort to eliminate certain aspects of medical practice that have been broadly shown to be inappropriate. [bib_ref] Choosing Wisely: how the UK intends to reduce harmful medical overuse, Wise [/bib_ref] Examples of this include initiatives by scientific institutions and 452 societies to issue "do not do" (DND) guidelines and informational and educational campaigns urging practitioners to "choose wisely."In an attempt to encourage patient participation in these measures, the foundation Advancing Medical Professionalism to Improve Health Care (ABIM)conducted an awarenessraising campaign among patients and care professionals to prevent improper use of resources within diagnosis and therapy. There is a well-known body of improper healthrelated beliefs and behaviors among patients, and these habits lead to harmful practices that must be eradicated if health outcomes are to be improved. [bib_ref] Choosing Wisely: how the UK intends to reduce harmful medical overuse, Wise [/bib_ref] Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) varies in prevalence from country to country; [bib_ref] Epidemiology and costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Chapman [/bib_ref] in Spain, the prevalence of COPD is 10.2% among adults between the ages of 40 and 80. [bib_ref] Prevalence of COPD in Spain: impact of undiagnosed COPD on quality of..., Miravitlles [/bib_ref] Of all the most prevalent illnesses, COPD is the only one that is on the rise. [bib_ref] Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age..., Lozano [/bib_ref] COPD is currently the third leading cause of death, behind ischemic heart disease and stroke. [bib_ref] Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age..., Lozano [/bib_ref] One of the main problems with this disease is underdiagnosis. [bib_ref] BOLD Collaborative Research Group, the EPI-SCAN Team, the PLATINO Team, and the..., Bernd [/bib_ref] The burden the disease poses for healthcare resources is substantial: the European Union estimates that the direct cost of COPD totals 38.6 billion euros in Europe, whereas the disease burden in the United States is also high, at 29.5 billion dollars.Major clinical guidelines for management of COPD, such as the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), an international standard,or the Spanish COPD guidelines (GesEPOC), 14 establish a series of recommendations on preventing, diagnosing, and treating this disease, both for stable as well as exacerbated cases, including indications adapted for different care levels.
Clinical guidelines advise healthcare professionals on appropriate procedures for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up in step with evolving knowledge of the disease.Despite this information, guides are not always applied correctly and a number of inappropriate practices persist with a certain degree of frequency. [bib_ref] Clinical audit of COPD in outpatient respiratory clinics in Spain: the EPOCONSUL..., Rubio [/bib_ref] [bib_ref] European COPD Audit team. Variability of hospital resources for acute care of..., Lopez-Campos [/bib_ref] [bib_ref] Overuse of short-acting betaagonist bronchodilators in COPD during periods of clinical stability, Fan [/bib_ref] Overuse continues in practice (defensive medicine or pressure from patients or relatives are common causes). [bib_ref] Physician response to patient request for unnecessary care, Kaul [/bib_ref] Moreover, the patient's health beliefs, customs, or misinterpretation could be causes of harm during self-care. These suboptimal measures can be ineffective, inefficient, or even deleterious for patients. [bib_ref] Physician response to patient request for unnecessary care, Kaul [/bib_ref] Making changes to routine clinical practice is less than simple, and requires sustained effort in the benefit of effective care. For this reason, a DND approach like the one presented here is useful in that it calls attention to certain aspects of clinical practice that were once widespread but are now known to be inappropriate -because there is no proof of their efficacy, due to scant or doubtful effectiveness, or because they are not cost-effective.This study aims to identify practices in diagnosis, therapy, and self-care of stable and exacerbated COPD that are inappropriate, have doubtful effectiveness, or are scarcely costeffective, and develop a list of DND recommendations for COPD health professionals and patients.

# Materials and methods
A qualitative research approach was applied. Qualitative research methods analyze phenomena from an overall perspective, attempting to describe reality without formulating hypotheses or setting concrete measures, thereby distinguishing them from quantitative approaches. [bib_ref] La investigacion cualitativa: una alternativa tambien valida, Mira [/bib_ref] This study was carried out in two phases. The first phase comprised an exploratory analysis (using the Metaplan technique), in which we created a list of overused practices, whereas in the second phase we aimed to reach a consensus definition of DND guidelines pertaining to practices that are still relatively common despite the fact that evidence makes a clear case that they have a poor risk-benefit ratio (using a consensus conference technique). The Spanish health system is mainly a public system in which COPD patients are evaluated, at first, by general practitioners, who initiate the treatment and send the patient to a pulmonologist to complete the evaluation. If there is a problem in the evaluation of the patient, the general practitioner begins the treatment. Some COPD patients are treated by physiotherapists and most of them are evaluated by nurses. Therefore, a panel with several pulmonologists, general practitioners, physiotherapists, and nurses is adequate to make a correct evaluation. Ten healthcare professionals participated in this study, each with .10 years' experience in treating COPD patients and involved in research and committees in their professional groups and healthcare levels. This group of collaborators was chosen to include a variety of perspectives drawn from different experiences with clinical practice and by balancing primary and in-hospital care. To do this, six pulmonologists (with experience in hospitalization, consultation, emergencies, home care, mechanical ventilation, and healthcare administration), two general practitioners, one nurse, and one physiotherapist were recruited by the Board of Neumomadrid (Madrid Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery). Two of the expert pulmonologists and a researcher with expertise in qualitative approaches acted as coordinators.
Once the working group had been formed, both the pulmonologist coordinators and the expert in qualitative research

## 453
Do not do in COPD designed an action plan that called for an initial meeting to be attended by all specialists involved, so as to brainstorm care or self-care practices used in COPD having benefits that do not outweigh their risks. Poor risk-benefit ratio was understood as doubtful effectiveness or deleterious patient outcomes, thus indicating that they were not cost-effective. During this first meeting, the group debated the frequency with which these practices are employed and the strength of the evidence used to deter continued use of these practices. The Metaplan technique [bib_ref] Use of qualitative methods in published health services and management research: a..., Weiner [/bib_ref] was used to identify such practices, to elaborate on them, and to rank them based on frequency. All members of the group began the analysis by noting down the practices they considered to be ill-advised. Based on the results of this method, a decision was made to ask three questions to be answered consecutively [fig_ref] Figure 1: Summary of the methodology used in the study, including the number of... [/fig_ref] : 1) Indicate which practices you consider to be both widely used in the management of patients with stable COPD and also inappropriate because of their poor risk-benefit ratio.
2) Indicate which practices you consider to be both widely used in the management of patients with exacerbated COPD and also inappropriate because of their poor risk-benefit ratio.
3) Indicate which self-care practices you believe are widespread among COPD patients and are inappropriate because of their poor risk-benefit ratio. Responses to these questions were gathered individually, and each collaborator was able to present as many practices as they saw fit. Similar questions were grouped together.
Subsequently, an open, unmoderated debate was held to discuss each of the examples of overuse that had been proposed in the previous phase so that the participants could assess the pertinence, degree of consensus, and sources of evidence for each one. Lastly, each individual coauthor evaluated the different proposed inappropriate practices according to the degree of prevalence in routine clinical practice. For this, a scale of 1-5 was employed, with 1 indicating scarce frequency of use and 5 representing practices that are relatively frequent despite being inadvisable or not cost-effective -that is, those practices discouraged by scientific evidence or professional consensus. In addition, the analysis took into account proposals referring to the same practice which were made by more than one study participant (spontaneity) and the level of agreement between participants (coefficient of variation). During this initial phase, scores around the 75th percentile were considered the cutoff; therefore, practices

## 454
Villar-Alvarez et al that had been given an average score of 3.5 points or lower, as it was believed that there was no consensus opinion indicating that these were in widespread use (variability coefficient .0.27; [fig_ref] Figure 1: Summary of the methodology used in the study, including the number of... [/fig_ref] , were proposed as inappropriate.
The methodology used in the second phase was the consensus conference. [bib_ref] Uso adecuado de la evidencia en la toma de decisiones. Metodo RAND/UCLA...., Martinez-Sahuquillo Amuedo [/bib_ref] For this, a web application was used to select DND recommendations that were most widely chosen. Each inappropriate practice was assigned a DND recommendation.
To assign each DND recommendation, all inappropriate practices were individually assessed (a scale from 1 to 10 was used) again by the group of experts to establish their perceived frequency of use, the degree to which the practice was considered useless, deleterious, or failed to add value, and, lastly, whether the practice was more prevalent among specialists in pulmonology, primary care, or nursing. Moreover, this phase included an opportunity for the collaborators to propose modifications and clarifications to the language used in the originally proposed description of these inappropriate practices. The expert participants had been given information on the degree of consensus reached in the previous phase for each practice perceived to be inappropriate (ie, mean, spontaneity, and coefficient of variation). These recommendations were ranked according to the result obtained by applying the formula frequency  intensity (range 1-100) once they were grouped according to COPD into stable, exacerbated, or related to self-care. We set a data-driven cutoff point of 57 points, meaning that scores below this value indicated a lower level of consensus [fig_ref] Figure 1: Summary of the methodology used in the study, including the number of... [/fig_ref].
An operational description was created for each of the recommendations processed according to this method, and we evaluated the level of evidence justifying the proposed inappropriateness of the measure. For proposals made for patient self-care, we based these assessments on literature concerning patient education and clinical experience. The resulting recommendations were distributed among the participants, and a descriptive file was created for each one, including the following fields: recommendation title, operative definition of the practice to be eradicated, description of the practice to be eradicated, justification given for the eradication proposal, level of evidence and recommendation grade according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN),bibliographical sources, and recommended indices to assess whether a change has taken place in the practice and to enable follow-up of the level of uptake of these DND recommendations [fig_ref] Figure 2: Description file for each "do not do" recommendation in COPD [/fig_ref].

# Results
When the Metaplan technique was applied, a total of 157 proposals were made concerning overuse practices in the treatment of patients with COPD, and 95 of these were intrinsically different from each other. Practices were eliminated if they received an average score of 3.5 points or lower, as it was believed that there was no consensus opinion surrounding them. This resulted in a total of 28 practices in stable COPD, 30 in exacerbated disease, and 37 self-care practices. Finally, we eliminated 40 examples of inappropriate practices for which there was insufficient consensus among the members of the research group or because they overlapped with others.
During the final phase, which consisted of a consensus conference, 55 proposals were assessed for possible inappropriateness or cost-ineffectiveness, and each one was assigned a DND recommendation: 17 for stable COPD, 18 for exacerbated COPD, and 20 concerning self-care among this population of patients. After the list was reviewed by the group of experts taking part in the study, the number of recommendations was reduced to 16 (after applying the formula frequency  intensity, and eliminating those recommendations with ,57 points): six for stable disease, six for exacerbated COPD, and four for patient selfcare [fig_ref] Table 1: Do not discontinue taking inhaled medication because an improvement in clinical symptoms... [/fig_ref].

## Practices discouraged for treatment of copd

## Name:
Operative definition of the practice that should be discontinued:

## Description:
Justification/remarks:

## Evidence:
Level of evidence:
Strength of recommendation:

## References:
Indicator proposed for follow-up of changes in the practice: The definitive list of six DND recommendations for stable COPD was as follows:
- Do not administer inhaled corticosteroids as routine treatment in patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) .60% and ,2 acute exacerbations in the previous year or in patients without an overlapping COPD-asthma phenotype. - Do not neglect to perform spirometry as part of the diagnostic work-up in patients with a past history of smoking and symptoms of COPD. - Do not assume that patients correctly administer inhaled medication in the absence of proper confirmation. - Do not initiate treatment without previously confirming the diagnosis by spirometry. - Do not change inhaled treatment without first assessing treatment compliance.
- Do not perform pulmonary function testing systematically at each follow-up visit if there is no change in symptoms, in the number of previous acute exacerbations, or in treatment. Six other DND recommendations, which concerned acute exacerbations of COPD, were as follows:
- Do not prescribe antibiotic treatment in all cases of acute exacerbation. - Do not prescribe nebulized medication in all cases of acute exacerbation. - Do not administer high-flow oxygen if oxygen saturation is .90% or if partial pressure of oxygen (PaO 2 ) is $60 mmHg. - Do not prescribe home oxygen therapy following an acute exacerbation if PaO 2 is $60 mmHg. - Do not prescribe corticosteroid therapy for periods of .14 days or with progressive reduction in therapy. Lastly, the four DND recommendations for self-care among patients with COPD were as follows:
- Do not discontinue taking inhaled medication because an improvement in clinical symptoms has taken place. - Do not use the inhaler incorrectly.
- Do not stop walking due to feelings of dyspnea.
- Do not take unprescribed treatments.
Subsequently, descriptive files containing technical specifications of each recommendation were created [fig_ref] Figure 2: Description file for each "do not do" recommendation in COPD [/fig_ref]. This file included the level of evidence and grade of recommendation -bases that justify DND recommendations -as well as indicators that allow for an assessment of the data collected [fig_ref] Table 2: level of evidence and grade of recommendation as indicated in sIgn 24... [/fig_ref]. Clinical guidelines, such as GOLDor GesEPOC,have been evaluated in the level of evidence and in the analysis of data collected.

# Discussion
Using a multi-phase methodology we identified a number of practices used in diagnosis, therapy, and other careincluding the self-care procedures that are the responsibility of patients -that are inappropriate, have doubtful effectiveness, or are not cost-effective for COPD patients. The results of this study should bring about an increase in care quality by reducing the frequency of practices that add no value or are harmful for patients, as well as by increasing patient safety, improving physician-patient communication, and better enabling patients to undertake self-care.
The National Physicians Alliance, a medical organization operating in the United States, set in motion a project called "Choosing Wisely," which called on a variety of medical societies -initially, those concerned with primary care, internal medicine, and pediatrics -to propose a list of five recommendations for medical practices with the aim of optimizing healthcare resources used to diagnose and treat different illnesses.In the United Kingdom, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has also published a set of DND recommendations, highlighting care practices that do not benefit patients or for which there is insufficient evidence upon which to base suggestions for use. Along these same lines, the American Thoracic Society (ATS), in partnership with the American College of Chest Physicians, created a list of five practices that are widely used to treat respiratory diseases in adults but that, nonetheless, should be avoided. [bib_ref] An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: the..., Wiener [/bib_ref] Although none of these concern COPD, the previous list of ten practices contained two that are relevant to COPD -that is, "Do not perform frequent spirometry in patients with COPD in patients who are clinically stable and gOlDMiravitlles et al [bib_ref] Spanish guideline for COPD (GesEPOC). Update, Miravitlles [/bib_ref] Vogelmeier et al [bib_ref] Efficacy and safety of once-daily QVA149 compared with twice daily salmeterol-fluticasone in..., Vogelmeier [/bib_ref] Zhong et al [bib_ref] LANTERN: a randomized study of QVA149 versus salmeterol/fluticasone combination in patients with..., Zhong [/bib_ref] Price et al [bib_ref] Management of COPD in the UK primary-care setting: an analysis of real-life..., Price [/bib_ref] have an established diagnosis" and "Do not routinely administer intravenous steroids for patients hospitalized for acute exacerbations of asthma and COPD." In Spain, the Ministry of Health, Social Services, and Equality launched the project titled "Commitment to Quality in Scientific Societies" 27 in order to reduce unnecessary interventions. As in the present study, the initiative took unnecessary interventions to mean those for which there was no proven efficacy, practices with scant or doubtful effectiveness, or procedures that are not cost-effective. A multitude of scientific societies took part in the initia-Miravitlles et al [bib_ref] Spanish guideline for COPD (GesEPOC). Update, Miravitlles [/bib_ref] Tashkin et al [bib_ref] UPLIFT Study Investigators. A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary..., Tashkin [/bib_ref] Vogelmeier et al [bib_ref] POET-COPD Investigators. Tiotropium vs salmeterol for the prevention of exacerbations of COPD, Vogelmeier [/bib_ref] Wise et al [bib_ref] Tiotropium respimat inhaler and the risk of death in COPD, Wise [/bib_ref] Decramer et alCelli et al Indicators used for assessment of "do not do" recommendations

## Group "do not do" recommendations indicators

## Patients with stable copd
Do not administer inhaled corticosteroids as routine treatment for patients with FeV 1 .60% and ,2 acute exacerbations in the previous year or in patients without an overlapping COPD-asthma phenotype.
number of patients with FeV 1 .60% and with 0-1 acute exacerbations in the previous year and who receive inhaled corticosteroids as routine treatment (exclusive of patients with an overlapping COPD-asthma phenotype)/number of patients diagnosed with COPD who receive inhaled corticosteroids as routine treatment. Do not neglect to perform spirometry as part of the diagnostic work-up in patients with a past history of smoking and symptoms of COPD.
number of patients who are smokers (at least 10 pack-years) over age 35 presenting respiratory symptoms and who have not received spirometry/number of patients who are smokers and have a diagnosis of COPD. Do not assume that patients correctly administer inhaled medication in the absence of proper confirmation. number of patients for whom the patient chart contains references to inhaled therapy (direct observation or as obtained through compliance questionnaires such as Test of adherence to Inhalers [TaI])/total number of patients with COPD and inhaled treatment. Do not initiate treatment without previously confirming the diagnosis by spirometry. number of patients prescribed home oxygen therapy following an acute exacerbation with PaO 2 $60 mmhg/total number of cases prescribed home oxygen therapy following an acute exacerbation. Do not prescribe corticosteroid therapy for periods of .14 days or with progressive reduction in therapy.
number of patients prescribed with long-term (.14 days) treatment with corticosteroids/total number of patients undergoing corticosteroid therapy. number of patients prescribed to receive progressive reduction of corticosteroid therapy/total number of patients undergoing corticosteroid therapy. Do not perform spirometry in patients with known COPD. number of spirometry studies performed during acute exacerbations in patients with previously known COPD/number of COPD patients with acute exacerbations. self-care in patients with COPD Do not discontinue taking inhaled medication because an improvement in clinical symptoms has taken place.
number of consultations assessing degree of compliance and proper therapy administration/total number of consultations.
Do not use the inhaler incorrectly.
number of consultations assessing errors in dosage or inhaler use/total number of consultations. Do not stop walking due to feelings of dyspnea.
Daily/weekly/monthly log of distance walked compared to the results of the individual 6-minute walking test. Improved score on surveys and rating scales for physical activity or activities of daily living. Do not take unprescribed treatments.
Total number of COPD patients receiving unprescribed therapy/total number of patients with COPD.
Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FeV 1 , forced expiratory volume in 1 second; PaO 2 , partial pressure of oxygen.

## 459
Do not do in COPD These working groups base their recommendations on the views of a group of subject-matter experts, selecting those practices that should not be subjected to assessment using qualitative methods. Each group works with a preliminary list of possible recommendations appearing in clinical practice guidelines, using these guidelines as a primary source. Use of this method allows for high levels of consensus on DND recommendations, although this method is limited in that, sometimes, discouraged practices are seldom used. We have taken measures to adjust for this by including recommendations that are commonly made in the context of routine practice.
In addition to the study's focus on a single disease such as COPD, one novel aspect of our article is the inclusion of DND recommendations concerning patient self-care. Specifically, we identified practices that are prevalent in COPD patient self-care despite their lack of effectiveness or even deleteriousness for these patients. Self-care in patients with COPD can improve health-related quality of life and reduce hospital admissions. [bib_ref] Five-year follow-up of a one-year selfmanagement program for patients with COPD, Lomundal [/bib_ref] [bib_ref] Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Axis of the Respiratory Health Network, Fonds de..., Gadoury [/bib_ref] Clari et al has provided evidence on the self-care behaviors and strategies that people with COPD undertake to prevent, control, and manage the physical, psychological, and social consequences of this pathology. [bib_ref] Self-care of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-synthesis, Clari [/bib_ref] Our four recommendations for self-care in patients with COPD and the proposed indicators for their evaluation could enable COPD patients to reduce the physical, psychological, and social effects of COPD, and help healthcare professionals to tailor self-care educational programs to the experiences and priorities of these patients. [bib_ref] Self-care of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-synthesis, Clari [/bib_ref] [bib_ref] Self-management programmes for COPD: moving forward, Effing [/bib_ref] Another strength of this study is its use of level of evidence and grade of recommendation in accordance with SIGN 24 and citations from the literature that support these recommendations.
Our study, furthermore, includes a series of proposals for follow-up of the frequency with which the cases of overuse included in the DND guidelines continue to be employed. These are COPD-related care-quality indicators that could be used by health authorities to assess outcomes. Additionally, these could be incorporated into the balanced scorecards used in care units or form part of the yearly targets set by management agreements. Proper deployment of recommendations enables appropriate oversight of the degree to which targets are being met and aids in target setting. These aspects have been scarcely used in other studies, [bib_ref] An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: the..., Wiener [/bib_ref] although we believe them to be necessary to address the problem of overuse.
Due to its local setting in Spain and the implications that this setting had for the design of the study, one limitation of this research is this local nature, as results may vary in other locations. Moreover, we did not include an analysis of the frequency with which the practices selected as inadvisable are employed in current clinical practice or in patient home care. Despite this, the study focuses on clinical and self-care practices that become evident in the clinical context due to their prolonged time of use.
In addition, the study is limited by the fact that, to date, no DND indicators have been included in quality assessments and, as a result, data concerning the efficacy of these recommendations are scarce. We do, however, make a proposal which would allow for a follow-up to be conducted on the degree of uptake of these recommendations. The DND included in this study as examples of overuse were chosen because of their cost-ineffectiveness, but they are not based on empirical evidence. Moreover, the list of inappropriate practices is not supported by any investigation of real prevalence, and is based on level of agreement for opinion and experience of a small panel of experts. No quantitative study has been undertaken to measure the degree of agreement with these DND recommendations among professional groups or patient representatives, and further research should examine data on the implementation of these recommendations as well as continuous follow-up.
We can conclude from this study that DND recommendations in COPD are likely to improve management of patients with the disease by reducing the rate with which improper or scarcely cost-effective practices are used in clinical care and patient self-care. Furthermore, the use of these recommendations will lower care risks, improve physicianpatient communication, and empower patients to undertake in-home self-care.

# Acknowledgments
This study was carried out under the auspices of the Madrid Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (Neumomadrid). The work was supported by the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (semFYC) and was funded without restriction by a grant from the AstraZeneca pharmaceutical company. We are grateful to Oliver Shaw (IIS-FJD) for his valuable assistance in preparing the manuscript in English. S Nunez-Palomo declares that she has written monographs or participated in courses and conferences sponsored by Boehringher, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, GSK, and Rovi, and has no other conflicts of interest in this work. P Vaquero-Lozano declares that in the last 5 years he has received payments for participating in meetings or congresses organized by the following pharmaceutical companies: Chiesi, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Almirall, Novartis, Sandoz, Pfizer, and Linde (Carburos Medica), and has no other conflicts of interest in this work.

# Disclosures
[fig] Figure 1: Summary of the methodology used in the study, including the number of ideas identified, selection criteria, and procedure used to screen "do not do" recommendations in COPD. Abbreviation: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal of COPD 2018:13 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress [/fig]
[fig] Figure 2: Description file for each "do not do" recommendation in COPD. Abbreviation: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal of COPD 2018:13 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress. [/fig]
[fig] F: Villar-Alvarez, R Moreno-Zabaleta, JJ Mira-Solves, E Calvo-Corbella, S Diaz-Lobato, Gonzalez-Torralba, A Hernando-Sanz, S Salgado-Aranda, B Simon-Rodriguez, and IM Navarro-Soler report no conflicts of interest in this work. International Journal of COPD 2018:13 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress. [/fig]
[table] Table 1: Do not discontinue taking inhaled medication because an improvement in clinical symptoms has taken place. Do not use the inhaler incorrectly. [/table]
[table] Table 2: level of evidence and grade of recommendation as indicated in sIgn 24 including bases that justify the "do not do" recommendations [/table]