The affiliations of the members of the Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table can be found at https:// covid19-sciencetable.ca/.# 
Once a Public Health Unit or neighborhood approaches 50 new COVID-19 cases per million per day (corresponding to 35 cases per 100,000 per week) and is in sustained exponential growth, we advise weekly voluntary screen testing of unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated individuals in elementary schools. Public health units in this situation may also decide to deploy rapid antigen testing in other settings, such as workplaces and congregate settings.
If a Public Health Unit's or neighborhood's new daily case rate approaches 250 COVID-19 cases per million per day (corresponding to 175 cases per 100,000 per week), weekly testing is likely not frequent enough to reduce spread effectively. In that case, we advise testing unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated individuals 2 to 3 times per week. Public health units in this situation may also consider voluntary screen testing of fully vaccinated individuals at the same frequency.
Rapid antigen tests may also present a valuable alternative to individual isolation after exposure in schools. Implementing voluntary "test to stay" protocols, where exposed students remain in school as long as daily tests are negative for SARS-CoV-2, could help prevent the harms of isolation without increasing transmission.
Individuals with positive rapid antigen tests should immediately isolate and undergo confirmatory Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing. Evaluation of the performance of rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of the Omicron variant is urgently needed.
Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table Rapid Antigen Tests for Voluntary Screen Testing

# Lay Summary
The Delta Variant and Rapid Antigen Tests
Rapid antigen tests identify SARS-CoV2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in the nose or throat by detecting proteins attached to the surface of the virus (the "antigen"). This approach makes rapid antigen tests different than PCR tests, which determine whether someone is infected with SARS-CoV2 by amplifying the virus' genetic material at a lab. Because rapid tests are more easily accessible for many people than PCR tests, can be deployed in a wide range of settings including homes and schools, and produce immediate results, accurate rapid antigen testing could be a useful tool for detecting COVID-19 early and isolating infected people before they have a chance to spread the virus. Understanding the accuracy of rapid antigen tests against the Delta variant, which currently dominates in Ontario, is a key piece of disease control.
This brief establishes the high accuracy of rapid antigen tests in detecting the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, which is currently the dominant variant in Ontario. The Delta variant multiplies rapidly in the human body, and so the viral load of infected individuals peaks sooner with Delta than with earlier variants, often before symptoms appear. That high viral load at an earlier stage of infection makes the Delta variant more contagious than earlier variants; it is also what makes rapid antigen testing more accurate with Delta than with earlier variants.
Using studies on people carrying a range of SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, we (1) confirmed that people with high viral loads are likely to transmit the virus to the people around them, and (2) established that rapid antigen tests can reliably detect those cases. Rapid antigen tests could therefore help interrupt the chain of transmission by identifying infectious cases of COVID-19 quickly, leading to prompt isolation of the infected person.

# Our Advice
Ontario could apply rapid antigen tests in many ways, but this brief focuses on voluntary screen testing: the practice of testing asymptomatic volunteers at regular intervals in settings where there is a moderate risk of transmission, such as schools and workplaces. We considered elementary schools a priority for voluntary screen testing given that students less than 12 years of age are not fully vaccinated in Ontario.
If the COVID-19 case rate in an elementary school's Public Health Unit or neighborhood approaches 50 cases per million per day (corresponding to 35 cases per 100,000 per week), we recommend that unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated people be tested once per week. If the COVID-19 case rate approaches 250 cases per million per day (175 cases per 100,000 per week), we recommend that unvaccinated people, and possibly also vaccinated people, be tested 2 to 3 times per week.
We also recommend using a "test to stay" approach in schools for individuals who have been exposed to someone with COVID-19 but do not have symptoms (often referred to as "contacts"). With this approach, contacts are offered daily rapid antigen testing as an alternative to self-isolation, and can continue with in-person learning as long as they test negative and remain asymptomatic for a defined risk period after exposure.

# Summary

# Background
Delta is currently the predominant variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in Ontario and internationally. It is more than twice as transmissible as the wild type virus that caused the first and second waves in Ontario, and 1.5 times as transmissible as the Alpha variant, which caused the third wave. While this early increase in viral load makes transmission of the Delta variant challenging to control, now that it predominates globally, rapid antigen tests may become more sensitive and more useful because of it.

# Questions
What is the peak viral load after infection with the Delta variant?
What is the relationship between viral load and transmission?
What is the performance of rapid antigen tests according to viral load or cycle threshold?
How do rapid antigen tests perform in people who are likely to be infectious?
How can rapid tests be used optimally to prevent transmission as well as the negative impacts of testing?

# Findings
The Delta variant reliably incites viral loads greater than 100,000 copies/mL (5 log 10 units). A higher viral load is reliably associated with a higher probability of transmission: a ten-fold increase in viral load (e.g., from 100,000 copies/mL to 1 million copies/mL) is, on average, associated with a 4.69-fold and 1.33-fold increase in the odds of a positive viral culture and onward transmission of the virus, respectively.
The ability of rapid antigen tests to detect a SARS-CoV-2 infection depends on the viral load of the sample, but diagnostic accuracy studies typically do not quantify viral load directly, and instead report cycle threshold (Ct) values. In subgroups of patients with Ct values of less than 30, the pooled sensitivity for any rapid antigen test and for the Abbott Panbio test (the most commonly used test in Ontario) was 79.9% and 83.4%, respectively. In subgroups of patients with Ct values of less than 25, sensitivity increased to 95.8% for any rapid antigen test, and to 94.1% for the Abbott Panbio test.
The post-test probability of an infectious case after a positive test at 50 cases per 1 million inhabitants per day (corresponding to 35 cases per 100,000 per week) was 25% in unvaccinated individuals, but only 5% in fully vaccinated individuals, which justifies rapid antigen tests only in unvaccinated individuals. However, at a rate of 200 cases per 1 million inhabitants per day, the post-test probability after a positive test was 57% in unvaccinated individuals and 18% in vaccinated individuals, justifying rapid antigen test use in both groups.
If the effective reproduction number (R t ) is consistently above 1.25, or if R t is around 1 and the rate in a Public Health Unit (or other geographical unit as appropriate) approaches 50 cases per million per day (35 cases per 100,000 per week) and if there is sustained exponential growth, weekly voluntary screen testing of unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated individuals is recommended in elementary schools. If the rate in a Public Health Unit approaches 250 cases per million per day (175 cases per 100,000 per week), weekly testing is unlikely to sufficiently reduce transmission and testing of unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated individuals 2 to 3 times per week is required. In this scenario, voluntary screen testing of fully vaccinated individuals at the same frequency should also be considered.
A "test-to-stay" approach with daily rapid testing of school-based contacts appears non-inferior to self-isolation for control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, with similar rates of symptomatic infections among students and staff with both approaches.

# Interpretation
Rapid antigen tests available in Ontario can reliably detect individuals with a viral load greater than 100,000 copies/mL of SARS-CoV-2, who therefore are likely to be infectious. As the viral load of Delta-infected individuals increases earlier in the disease process, these tests likely perform better in the face of the Delta variant compared to previous strains of SARS-CoV-2.
Individuals with positive rapid antigen tests should immediately isolate and undergo confirmatory PCR testing, which will reduce the potential harm of unnecessary prolonged isolation in rare false positive cases, and will also ensure provincial case and contact tracing.

# Background
Delta is currently the predominant variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in Ontario and internationally. 1 It is more than twice as transmissible as the wild type virus that caused the first and second waves in Ontario, and 1.5 times as transmissible as the Alpha variant. 2 The Delta variant also causes more severe illness than the wild type and the Alpha variant. 3 While the Omicron variant appears to spread more quickly than Delta, as of December 7, 2021 Delta remains dominant in Ontario. The effectiveness of rapid antigen testing in detecting Omicron also remains unclear, and needs to be studied urgently. This brief thus does not include any evidence or recommendations regarding rapid antigen testing for the Omicron variant.
The increased transmissibility of the Delta variant compared to previous strains can be partially explained by the viral load trajectory after infection. Figure 1 shows the progression of viral load in individuals infected with the delta variant compared to the wild type virus. Within the first four days after exposure, the viral load of the Delta variant increases considerably faster and peaks sooner than the wild type virus, 4,5 typically producing a viral load of 100,000 copies/mL (5 log 10 units) only one to two days after exposure.

# Figure 1. Representative Trajectories of Viral Loads for the Delta Variant as Compared with the Wild Type
The viral load of the Delta variant increases quickly and reaches its peak earlier than the wild type virus, 4 typically producing a viral load of 100,000 copies/mL (5 log 10 units) one to two days after exposure. After reaching the peak viral load, the trajectories are likely similar between the two variants. Each log 10 unit corresponds to a 10-fold increase in viral load (copies/mL). Graph based on data from Li et al 4 and Kang et al. 5 While this early increase in viral load makes transmission of the Delta variant challenging to control, now that it predominates in Ontario and internationally, rapid antigen tests may become more sensitive and more useful because of it.  Consistent with this concept, Bekliz et al recently found that rapid antigen tests are sufficiently sensitive to detect variants of concern, including the Delta variant. 9 Rapid antigen tests might be particularly useful for voluntary screen testing, which entails regular voluntary testing of asymptomatic individuals to find cases in moderate-risk settings such as schools and workplaces (Box 1). This Science Brief will only discuss voluntary screen testing and test to stay strategies, as indicated in the Box below.

# Type of Testing Description
Addressed in this Brief? Rapid Antigen Testing in Asymptomatic Individuals Voluntary screen testing Regular voluntary testing of asymptomatic individuals to find cases in moderate-risk settings such as schools and workplaces.

# Yes

# Test to stay
Daily voluntary testing of asymptomatic contacts of individuals with a positive COVID-19 test in schools instead of requiring isolation.

# Yes

# Test to protect
Regular mandatory testing of asymptomatic individuals to find cases in high-risk settings to protect the vulnerable (e.g., hospitals, long-term care homes, prisons).

# No

# Test to enable (including "test to play")
Regular mandatory testing of asymptomatic individuals to enable participation in activities with a high risk of transmission (e.g., close-contact sports, visits to long-term care homes).

# No

# Test to release
One-time or repeated mandatory testing of asymptomatic contacts or travelers to allow for early release from quarantine.

# No

# Outbreak response testing
One-time or repeated voluntary or mandatory testing of asymptomatic individuals in a facility, such as a workplace or congregate setting, with a COVID-19 outbreak as an alternative to closure.

# No

# Rapid Antigen Testing in Symptomatic Individuals Diagnostic testing
One-time or repeated testing of symptomatic individuals in settings where PCR testing is less accessible, or in individuals with few or atypical symptoms.

# No

# Box 1. Potential Indications for Rapid Antigen Testing and Whether they Are Addressed in this Science Brief
Adapted from Crozier et al. 8 In this Science Brief, we assessed the usefulness of rapid antigen testing through a sequence of questions derived from the following logic. Rapid antigen tests detect proteins attached to the surface of a virus. PCR, the established gold standard for testing, identifies the virus by replicating its genetic material through enough cycles to make it detectable; the fewer cycles that are necessary to make viral material detectable, the more viral material there is. The number of cycles needed to surpass this threshold of detection is called cycle threshold. In this Science Brief, we assessed whether cases with high viral loads/low cycle thresholds are likely to be infectious, and if so, whether rapid antigen tests can reliably detect those cases.

# Questions
What is the peak viral load after infection with the Delta variant?

# What is the relationship between viral load and transmission?
What is the performance of rapid antigen tests according to viral load or cycle threshold?
How do rapid antigen tests perform in people who are likely to be infectious?
How can rapid tests be used optimally to prevent transmission as well as the negative impacts of testing? 

# Findings Peak Viral Load after Infection with the Delta Variant
Figure 2 presents the peak viral load observed in 45 individuals infected with the Delta variant who underwent daily testing after exposure. A total of 43 individuals had peak viral loads greater than 100,000 copies/mL (5 log 10 units), and 41 individuals (91.1%) had peak viral loads greater than 1 million copies/mL (6 log 10 units). 10 The Delta variant therefore reliably incites high viral loads greater than 100,000 copies/mL. The peak viral loads were similar between unvaccinated and fully vaccinated individuals, but viral load declined faster in vaccinated individuals after reaching the peak. A total of 43 individuals had peak viral loads greater than 100,000 copies/mL (5 log 10 units), and 41 individuals (91.1%) had peak viral loads greater than 1 million copies/mL (6 log 10 units). Data from Singanayagam et al. 10 

# Relationship between Viral Load and Transmission
In the sections above, we established that Delta carries a higher viral load at an earlier stage of infection than other variants. If rapid antigen tests can reliably detect cases with a high viral load, then it is important to know if those are the cases that are likely to be infectious. Here, we determine whether a high viral load is associated with a higher probability of transmission.
Table 1 presents the results of the seven identified studies that estimated the association between viral load and the odds of a positive viral culture for the wild type virus and Alpha variant.  A positive viral culture suggests viable virus that can potentially be transmitted to others. Conversely, a negative culture implies low transmission potential, as no viable virus could be grown.
The median odds ratio per log 10 increase in viral load was 4.69, indicating that a tenfold increase in viral load (e.g., from 100,000 copies/mL to 1 million copies/mL) is associated with a 4.69-fold increase in the odds of a positive viral culture, on average. Results were consistent across studies, with the exception of those reported by Korenkov et al, which suggested a considerably stronger relationship between viral load and the odds of a positive culture. 12 Six of the seven identified studies were suitable for inclusion in a meta-analysis of the probability of a positive viral culture by viral load. At a viral load of 10,000 copies/ mL (4 log 10 units), there was little variation between estimates, resulting in a pooled probability of a positive culture of 0.2% (Figure 3). The probability increased alongside viral load, with higher variation between studies at a viral load of 10 million copies/mL (7 log 10 units) or more. At the maximum viral load of 1 billion copies/mL, the pooled probability of a positive culture was 92.5%.
Table 2 presents the results of five identified studies that estimated the association between viral load and the odds of transmission, mainly for the wild type virus and Alpha variant.  The association for the Delta variant was consistent. 22 The median odds ratio per log 10 increase in viral load in any setting, or within a non-household setting, was 1.33, indicating that, on average, a ten-fold increase in viral load (e.g., from 100,000 copies/mL to 1 million copies/mL) is associated with a 1.33-fold increase in the odds of transmission. The only study that assessed the association in a household setting specifically found an odds ratio of 1.77 per log 10 increase in viral load. 19 Since there is less variation in the exposure of contacts in household settings, this stronger association is expected.  

# Five Studies Estimating the Association Between Observed Viral Load and Odds of Transmission by Virus Strain and Setting
The median odds ratio per log 10 increase in viral load in any setting, or within a non-household setting, was 1.33, indicating that a ten-fold increase in viral load (e.g., from 100,000 copies/mL to 1 million copies/mL) is associated with a 1.33-fold increase in the odds of transmission, on average. The only study that assessed the association in a household setting specifically found an odds ratio of 1.77 per log 10 increase in viral load. 19 Figure 4 shows the estimated relationship between viral load and the probability of positive culture, the probability of transmission in households, and the probability of transmission in any setting, based on the studies included in Tables 1 and 2. The association with viral load was strong in all three cases. Below a viral load of 1 million copies/mL (6 log 10 units), the estimated probability of transmission is higher than the estimated probability of a positive culture, which may be due to the timing of sampling: individuals with viral loads below 1 million copies/mL who caused transmission may not have been sampled at their peak viral load. Regardless, a high viral load appears to be associated with a higher probability of positive viral culture and onward transmission for the wild type virus and the Alpha variant, and this relationship likely also holds true for the Delta variant. At a viral load of 10,000 copies/mL (4 log 10 units), there was little variation between estimates, resulting in a pooled probability of a positive culture of 0.2%. The probability increased alongside viral load, with higher variation between studies at a viral load of 10 million copies/mL (7 log 10 units) or more. At the maximum viral load of 1 billion copies/mL, the pooled probability of a positive culture was 92.5%.

# Figure 4. Estimated Association Between Observed Viral Load and Probability of Positive Culture, Transmission in Households and Transmission in Any Setting
There are strong associations between viral load and the probability of positive culture, the probability of transmission in household settings, and the probability of transmission in any setting. Median estimates of the associations were taken from Tables 1 and 2, the association for household settings is from Marc et al. 19 

# Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests According to Viral Load and Cycle Threshold
Having established that Delta is characterized by early, high viral loads and that a higher viral load is associated with a higher probability of cultured virus and transmission, we assessed whether rapid antigen tests are effective at detecting infections in people with early, high viral loads that appear to drive Delta's transmission. Below, we relate the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by rapid antigen tests with minimum cycle threshold (Ct) values found in PCR tests.  23 The Abbott Panbio test is the most commonly used test in Ontario. 24 A higher viral load is associated with a lower PCR Ct value, as less amplification of the viral genetic material in the sample is needed to reach the threshold for detection.
At a viral load of 100,000 copies/mL (corresponding to a Ct value of 25.0 according to a single study by Peto et al) 23 , the estimated sensitivity of the Abbott Panbio test was 84.3%. At a viral load of 1 million copies/mL (corresponding to a Ct value of 21.5), the estimated sensitivity was 94.1%. At 100 million copies/mL, which corresponds to the peak viral load in more than 50% of the 45 people studied in Figure 2, the estimated sensitivity was 99.3%.   6 The manufacturer of the BTNX Rapid Response test reported a specificity of 100%. 25 There are many rapid antigen tests available globally, and their sensitivity can vary widely; 26 however, the tests available in Ontario are all sufficiently sensitive and specific to be useful.

# Relationship between Cycle Threshold (Ct) Values and Viral Load
In the course of establishing that rapid antigen tests are effective in detecting cases with high viral loads, we now assess the variation in the reported relationship between Ct values and actual viral loads. This relationship is established at the level of the laboratory performing the PCR tests during test calibration. Our assessment allows us to define a maximum Ct value, that may be used to identify the subgroup of people with SARS-CoV-2 infections that should be analyzed to estimate the diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests when detecting infectious cases.
The relationship between Ct value and viral load depends on the type of assay, the RNA primer and the calibration process. Figure 5 shows the estimated range of Ct values at a viral load of 100,000 Copies/mL from 42 identified standard curves. 20,22,23, The median Ct value at this viral load was 25 20,22,23, The median Ct value at this viral load was 25.82 (interquartile range 23.03 to 29.27). Ct, cycle threshold.
Figure 6 shows the cumulative distribution of viral loads at a Ct value of 30 from the same 42 standard curves used to produce Figure 5. At a Ct value of 30, the median viral load was 5,400 copies/mL (interquartile range 500 to 60,000 copies/mL), and an estimated 83% of assays reported viral loads below 100,000 copies/mL at this threshold.
The pooled sensitivity estimates provided by Brummer et al 6 for the subgroup of patients with Ct values below 30 can therefore be used to produce conservative estimates of the diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests when detecting infectious cases with viral loads of 100,000 copies/mL or more.

# Ability of Rapid Antigen Tests to Detect or Rule Out Infectious Cases
In the previous sections, we established that rapid antigen tests can detect the high viral loads that characterize an early Delta infection, and that these high viral loads are associated with the likelihood of transmission. We also established that samples with a Ct value of less than 30 can be used to conservatively estimate the ability of rapid antigen tests to detect or rule out with reasonable certainty currently infectious cases. Here, we return to the patient themselves to assess the probability of being an infectious case after a positive or negative rapid antigen test, taking into account case rates in the community or a Public Health Unit, and the individual's vaccination status.
Figure 7 presents the number of COVID-19 cases per 1 million inhabitants per day in Ontario by vaccination status. The case numbers are currently five to six times greater in unvaccinated individuals compared to fully vaccinated individuals, which means that the pre-test probability of SARS-CoV-2 infection is also five to six times greater in the unvaccinated population. The results of a rapid antigen test should therefore always be interpreted taking the individual's vaccination status into consideration.  20,22,23, At a Ct value of 30, the median viral load was 5,400 copies/mL, and an estimated 83% of assays reported viral loads below 100,000 copies/mL at this threshold. Ct, cycle threshold.
The most conservative pooled estimate of the sensitivity of rapid antigen tests for detecting an infectious case reported by Brummer et al is 79.9% in patients with Ct values less than 30. The most conservative pooled estimate of specificity (reported for the Quidel Sofia test) is 99.1%. 6 We feel that our estimates of sensitivity are conservative, and would account for the lower test sensitivity that occurs when the test is performed by a lay person instead of a professional, such as a laboratory scientist or health worker. 23 These estimates can be used to calculate likelihood ratios for a positive or negative test result, which depend on sensitivity and specificity.
The likelihood ratio for a positive test result specifies how much more likely it is to obtain a positive test result in an infectious case compared to someone who is not infected or unlikely to be infectious. 44 Using the aforementioned sensitivity and specificity, the positive likelihood ratio is 0.799/(1-0.991)=88.8, indicating that the test has the power to confidently rule in an infectious case.
The likelihood ratio for a negative test result indicates how much less likely it is to obtain a negative result in a potentially infectious case compared to someone who is not infected or unlikely to be infectious. 44 Using the aforementioned sensitivity and specificity, the negative likelihood ratio is (1-0.799)/ 0.991=0.20, which is low enough to be clinically relevant and have the power to rule out an infectious case.
Figure 8 presents the relationship between the daily rate of COVID-19 cases in Ontario and the post-test probability of an infectious case after a positive or negative rapid antigen test. The post-test probability is influenced by the pre-test probability, and the test result (positive vs. negative) and by the likelihood ratio of the rapid antigen test being used.

# Figure 7. COVID-19 Cases per 1 Million Inhabitants per Day in Ontario by Vaccination Status
The number of COVID-19 Cases per 1 million inhabitants per day in unvaccinated people is currently 4 to 6 times higher than in fully vaccinated people, which needs to be taken into account when interpreting results of rapid antigen tests.

# Figure adapted from Ontario Dashboard. 1
Unvaccinated people have a higher pre-test probability of disease, and therefore have a higher probability of being an infectious case after both a positive or a negative test compared to vaccinated people. This information is relevant to decisions about rapid antigen test use. For example, the post-test probability of an infectious case after a positive test at 50 cases per 1 million inhabitants per day (corresponding to 740 cases per day in Ontario, or to 35 cases per 100,000 per week) is 25% in unvaccinated individuals, but only 5% in fully vaccinated individuals, which justifies rapid antigen tests only in unvaccinated individuals. However, at a rate of 200 cases per 1 million inhabitants per day (140 cases per 100,000 per week), the post-test probability after a positive test is 57% in unvaccinated individuals and 18% in vaccinated individuals, justifying rapid antigen test use in both groups. Individuals with positive rapid antigen tests should immediately isolate and undergo confirmatory PCR testing. The post-test probability of an infectious case after a negative test is always below 1% when the rate is below 600 cases per 1 million inhabitants per day (420 cases per 100,000 per week).

# Frequency of Voluntary Screen Testing
Having established the value of rapid antigen testing as a screening test, we can now ask when and how Public Health Units should deploy them to control the spread of Delta and possibly other variants.
Figure 9 presents different epidemiological and testing scenarios modelled by Paltiel et al for unvaccinated college students, 45 suggesting that the rate of COVID-19 cases and the effective reproduction number (Rt) in the community dictates testing frequency. Scenario A assumed a rate of 40 COVID-19 cases per million per day in the community and moderate exponential growth with an R t of 1.5. Scenario B assumed 80 cases per million per day in the community, and high exponential growth with an R t of 2.5. Scenario C assumed 200 cases per million per day in the community, and explosive exponential growth with an R t of 3.5.  Rapid antigen tests can be used as a tool to reduce transmission when they identify infectious cases of COVID-19 quickly and lead to prompt isolation of the infected person. In scenario A, weekly testing resulted in an 84% reduction of COVID-19 cases, with only small reductions in transmission with further increases in the frequency of testing. However, in scenario B, the increase in frequency from once to twice a week resulted in a further 22% reduction in cases, which could justify more frequent testing.
In scenario C, weekly testing was insufficient to reduce transmission; testing should be performed 2 to 5 times per week.  

# Test to Stay Approach
Rapid antigen tests are a potentially useful alternative to isolation following exposure to a SARS-CoV-2-infected individual, particularly in schools. A randomized cluster trial performed in England by Young et al found no difference in rates of SARS-CoV-2 infections in staff and students between schools that offered daily rapid antigen testing to close contacts of cases, and schools that used self-isolation to manage close contacts when COVID-19 case rates were low to moderate. 46 The trial took place over a 10-week period between April and June of 2021, before the Delta variant predominated, and randomly allocated participating schools to two groups. 102 schools with approximately 112,000 students and 12,000 staff offered daily rapid antigen testing to close contacts as an alternative to self-isolation. 99 schools with 103,000 students and 12,000 staff were assigned to the control: mandatory 10day self-isolation after close contact with a case. 42% of the contacts of cases in the intervention group consented to daily testing as an alternative to self-isolation. The study reported 59.1 infections per 100,000 person-weeks at risk in the control group and 61.8 infections per 100,000 person-weeks at risk in the intervention group, for an adjusted incidence rate ratio of 0.96 (95% CI 0.75-1.22). The authors concluded that daily rapid testing of school-based contacts was non-inferior to self-isolation for control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, with similar rates of symptomatic infections among students and staff with both approaches. Using a "test to stay" approach could therefore allow in-person learning of those who do test negative to continue whenever possible, minimizing the harm of voluntary screen testing and isolation of contacts of detected cases.

# Interpretation
Rapid antigen tests available in Ontario can reliably detect individuals with a viral load greater than 100,000 copies/mL of SARS-CoV-2, who therefore are likely to be infectious (see Figure 1). As the viral load of Delta-infected individuals increases earlier in the disease process, these tests likely perform better in the face of the Delta variant compared to previous strains of SARS-CoV-2.
Rapid antigen tests, when used for voluntary screen testing to identify asymptomatic infectious cases at specific thresholds, can be a useful tool to reduce transmission in schools and other settings. If the rate in a Public Health Unit approaches 50 COVID-19 cases per million per day (corresponding to 35 cases per 100,000 per week), weekly voluntary screen testing of unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated individuals is recommended in elementary schools, and potentially in other settings.
If the rate in a Public Health Unit approaches 250 COVID-19 cases per million per day (corresponding to 175 cases per 100,000 per week), weekly testing is unlikely to sufficiently reduce transmission and testing of unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated individuals 2 to 3 times per week is required. In this scenario, voluntary screen testing of fully vaccinated individuals should also be considered.
It is important to note that while rapid tests may help with earlier detection of Delta variant cases, they are not sufficient for controlling spread. Successful implementation of a rapid testing program relies on ensuring that supports are in place for all related activities, including distribution, case and contact tracing and lab-based testing, results management, and education. This brief does not address the additional challenges associated with implementation.
Individuals with positive rapid antigen tests should immediately isolate and undergo confirmatory PCR testing, which will reduce the potential harm of unnecessary prolonged isolation in rare false positive cases, and will also ensure provincial case and contact tracing. The recommended thresholds were derived based on the assumptions outlined in this Science Brief and can serve as a guidance for Public Health Units. Evaluation of the performance of rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of the Omicron variant is urgently needed. 47

# Methods Used for This Science Brief
We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, the COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews, the Joanna Briggs Institute's COVID-19 Special Collection, LitCovid in PubMed, the Oxford COVID-19 Evidence Service, the World Health Organization's Global Literature on Coronavirus Disease, and other COVID-19 specific resources listed by the Guidelines International Network and the McMaster Health Forum. In addition, we retrieved reports citing relevant articles through Google Scholar and reviewed references from identified articles for additional studies. The search was last updated on November 18, 2021.
The COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Network performed a research evidence scan for this Science Brief, published in an Evidence Synthesis Briefing Note. 48 The COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Network is comprised of organizations in Ontario's evidence synthesis and knowledge translation community who collectively provide high-quality, relevant, and timely synthesized research evidence about COVID-19. The Methods for the evidence scan can be found in the methods section of the Briefing Note.
We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of the probability of a positive viral culture by viral load. The relationship between the rate of cases per million inhabitants per day and the post-test probability after a positive or negative rapid antigen test in unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals was estimated based on pre-test probabilities, which were a function of rates of diagnosed cases. We transformed these probabilities into pre-test odds, multiplied the pre-test odds with likelihood ratios to derive post-test odds, and back-transformed these post-test odds into posttest probabilities. To derive pre-test probabilities we assumed that 40% of actual SARS-CoV-2 infections were diagnosed in Ontario; that diagnosed cases would remain active and contributed to community transmission for an average of 6 days, while undiagnosed cases contributed to community transmission for an average of 10 days; and that the average rate of COVID-19 cases would need to be multiplied by a factor of 3.5 to estimate the rate in unvaccinated individuals, and by 0.6 to estimate the rate in vaccinated individuals. These factors corresponded to the mean of observed multiplication factors of 3.5 (standard deviation 0.1) for unvaccinated and 0.6 (standard deviation 0.02) for vaccinated individuals during the previous 30 days.

# Author Contributions
PJ conceived the Science Brief. PJ and PB performed analyses. PJ and SB performed literature searches and wrote the first draft of the Science Brief. PJ and PB extracted data. All authors revised the Science Brief critically for important intellectual content and approved the final version.