Summary of the Standards, Options and Recommendations for nutritional support in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (2002)

 [bib_ref] Recommended guidelines for the management of autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation...., Rowe [/bib_ref] 

## Objectives
The objective of these guidelines is to define the role of enteral and parenteral nutrition in the nutritional management of patients who have undergone or who will undergo bone marrow transplantation. The role of some specific substrates and emulsions (e.g. lipids, glutamine) in this clinical situation will also be considered.
There are several areas of controversy, for example, the role of glutamine supplementation [bib_ref] Prise en charge nutritionnelle des malades allogreffes de moelle, Ribaud [/bib_ref]. The importance and best means of nutritional management in patients who have undergone or are about to undergo bone marrow transplantation were addressed.
The questions addressed by the working group were:
What are the clinical and metabolic consequences of malnutrition? What factors should be taken into consideration in the nutritional assessment of these patients? What is the efficacy of artificial nutrition (enteral or parenteral) in terms of survival? What is the impact on risks and infectious complications? What nutritional support should be used (enteral or parenteral nutrition)? What protein and lipid supplements should be used? What therapeutic strategies should be adopted?

# Methods
Full details of the methodology used have been published [bib_ref] SOR: project methodology, Fervers [/bib_ref]. A multidisciplinary working group was set up by the French National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer -FNCLCC) to review the best available evidence concerning artificial nutrition in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. A literature search of Medline s from 1991 to 2001 and The Cochrane Library s (2001, issue 1) was performed. The search was limited to articles published in English and French. Editorials, letters, case reports and animal studies were eliminated by the search strategy. The key words were bone marrow transplantation or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation combined with nutrition or nutrition assessment. A specific search for randomised clinical trials was performed. Economic studies on this subject were not taken into consideration. The resulting reference list was completed with references from the personal reference databases of the members of the working group, including one reference published in Spanish.
Infection is the principle risk during bone marrow transplantation. Thus, the primary outcomes for evaluating the efficacy of nutritional support in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation are the reduction in number and type of clinical infections and survival.
The secondary outcomes are: reduction in the length of hospitalisation in a bone marrow transplantation unit; reduction of the incidence and severity of the GVH reactions; antibiotic use; reduction in the volume of red blood cell and platelet transfusions; improved anthropometrical and laboratory parameters; time to the resolution of bone marrow suppression.
After selection and critical appraisal of the articles, the working group developed the 'Standards', 'Options' and 'Recommendations' (SORs) for nutrition support in bone marrow transplant patients based on the best available scientific evidence or on expert agreement. These guidelines were then reviewed by a group of independent experts (see the Appendix) and finalised after taking into consideration their comments.
'Standards' identify clinical situations for which there exist strong indications or contraindications for a particular intervention, and 'Options' identify situations for which there are several alternatives, none of which have shown clear superiority over the others [fig_ref] Table 1: Definition of 'Standards, Options and Recommendations' [/fig_ref]. In any SOR, there can be several 'Options' for a given clinical situation. 'Recommendations' enable the 'Options' to be weighted according to the available evidence. Several interventions can be recommended for the same clinical situation, so that clinicians can make a choice according to specific clinical parameters, for example, local circumstances, skills, equipment, resources and patient preferences. The adaptation of the SOR to the local situation is allowable if the reason for the choice is sufficiently transparent and this is crucial for successful implementation. Inclusion of patients in clinical trials is an appropriate form of patient management in oncology and is recommended frequently within the SORs, particularly in situations where evidence is too weak to support an intervention.
The type of evidence underlying any 'Standard', 'Option' or 'Recommendation', is indicated using a classification developed by the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) based on previously published models. The level of evidence depends not only on the type and quality of the studies reviewed, but also on the concordance of the results [fig_ref] Table 2: Definition of level of evidence [/fig_ref]. When no clear scientific evidence exists, judgement is made according to the professional experience and consensus of the working group ('expert agreement').
These guidelines will be updated when new scientific evidence becomes available or when there is a change in expert agreement. The French full text version has been published [bib_ref] Standards, options and recommendations for nutritional support in bone marrow transplant patients, Raynard [/bib_ref] and is also available at: (http://www.fnclcc.fr). A French summary version was produced, based on the full text, and this has been translated into English here.

## Clinical and metabolic consequences of malnutrition
Moderate malnutrition is frequent before bone marrow transplantation (level of evidence: C). The prevalence of severe malnutrition before bone marrow transplantation has not been accurately assessed. Malnutrition is an independent risk factor for mortality after bone marrow transplantation (level of evidence: C).
Severe malnutrition occurs rapidly in the absence of appropriate nutritional support after myeloablative conditioning (level of evidence: C). Gut disorders are the chief cause of malnutrition and deficiency syndromes (level of evidence: C). Nitrogen deficiency is often severe after myeloablative conditioning (level of evidence: B2). A precise evaluation of the incidence of malnutrition in patients who have undergone bone marrow transplantation is necessary (recommendation, expert agreement).

## Nutritional assessment and follow-up (figure 1)
There is no standard. Nutritional assessment and follow-up can be considered in patients who have undergone or are about to undergo bone marrow transplantation (option). Routine nutritional evaluation should be carried out before transplantation (recommendation, expert agreement).

## Modalities for nutritional assessment and follow-up and for assessing protein-energy intake
The initial nutritional assessment should include a body weight measurement and percentage loss of body weight (standard, expert agreement). The initial nutritional evaluation can include assays for albumin, transthyretin and C-reactive protein (option).
Nutritional follow-up should include weekly determination of body weight, clinical surveillance of the hydration status and weekly evaluation of oral food intake (standard, expert agreement). Nutritional surveillance can include an assay for transthyretin in the absence of liver and/or kidney failure (option).
The recommended daily nonprotein calorie intake is between 25 and 35 kcal kg A1 and the recommended daily nitrogen intake is between 200 and 250 mg kg A1 (recommendation, expert agreement).

## Artificial nutrition
Artificial nutrition is indicated in patients after bone marrow transplantation with myeloablative conditioning (standard) [fig_ref] Figure 3: Management of patients with denutrition detected during pretransplantation assessment [/fig_ref]. In other situations, there is no routine indication for artificial nutrition. The different modalities of nutritional support available are artificial nutrition, intravenous hydration and oral nutrition.
The recommendations depend on the patients' initial nutritional status and the expected duration of any gastrointestinal problems. In patients who are not suffering from malnutrition after nonmyeloablative conditioning and whose oral intake is more than 60% of the requirements, oral nutrition should be maintained with intravenous hydration during hospitalisation (recommendation, expert agreement). In patients who are not suffering from malnutrition after myeloablative conditioning, artificial nutrition should be started from day 1 (recommendation, expert agreement).
Artificial nutrition should be given to patients suffering from malnutrition (more than 10% loss of body weight) irrespective of the type of transplant or conditioning (recommendation, expert agreement).

## Oral or parenteral nutrition
There are no standard modalities for artificial nutrition (level of evidence: B1). Total enteral or parenteral nutrition or enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition can be considered (option). Enteral and parenteral nutrition give the same clinical and metabolic results (level of evidence: B1).
Enteral nutrition is theoretically possible, but its safety is variable (recommendation, level of evidence: B1). Enteral nutrition rather than parenteral nutrition should be the preferred first-line treatment in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation without myeloablative conditioning (recommendation, expert agreement). This should be combined with parenteral nutrition when the calorie-nitrogen intake is less than 60% of the requirements (recommendation, expert agreement).
Total parenteral nutrition should be reserved for patients who have an intolerance of oral or enteral nutrition, those who have an obstruction in the digestive tract or those who have severe mucositis (recommendation, expert agreement). Dietetic follow-up should be continued for some time after the graft to facilitate resumption of oral feeding and withdrawal from artificial nutrition (recommendation, expert agreement). Randomised clinical trials should be undertaken to compare enteral and parenteral nutrition (recommendation, expert agreement).

## Lipid intake
A lipid intake of 30% of the nonprotein energy intake, should be used during bone marrow transplantation (standard, level of evidence: B1) with no preference for medium-chain or long-chain triglycerides (standard, level of evidence: B1). A lipid intake of more than 30% can be considered without increasing the risk of adverse effects (option, level of evidence: B1).
Other types of lipid emulsions should only be used in the setting of a randomised clinical trial using relevant clinical outcomes in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (recommendation, expert agreement). A reduction in the incidence of serious GVH reactions by a high lipid intake should be confirmed (recommendation, expert agreement).

## Protein substrates
There is no justification for supplementation with nitrogencontaining substrates or oral glutamine in the nutritional support of these patients. Parenteral glutamine supplementation can be considered (option). Nitrogen-containing substrates (glutamine, branched chain amino acids, arginine, ornithine alpha-ketogluta-

## Strategies for nutritional support
Patients with myeloablative conditioning Artificial nutrition should be considered in patients with myeloablative conditioning (standard) [fig_ref] Figure 3: Management of patients with denutrition detected during pretransplantation assessment [/fig_ref]. There are no standard modalities. Enteral nutrition with or without intravenous glutamine, enteral and parenteral nutrition, total parenteral nutrition with or without intravenous glutamine can all be considered. Total parenteral nutrition is recommended for patients with severe mucositis (expert agreement). Artificial nutrition should be started on day 1 (expert agreement).
Patients without myeloablative conditioning There are no standards. Artificial nutrition (enteral nutrition with or without intravenous glutamine, enteral and parenteral nutrition) intravenous hydration or oral nutrition can be considered [fig_ref] Figure 3: Management of patients with denutrition detected during pretransplantation assessment [/fig_ref]. Total parenteral nutrition is recommended for patients with severe mucositis (expert agreement * When enteral nutrition provides less than 60% of the calorie-nitrogen intake requirements and/or the patient has a digestive intolerance, enteral nutrition should be replaced or completed with parenteral nutrition.

## Patient with denutrition
Transplant with myeloablative conditioning?
Patient with denutrition having undergone myeloablative conditioning Severe mucositis?
[fig] Figure 1, Figure 2: Assessment of the pretransplantation nutritional status. Nutritional of Cancer (2003) 89(Suppl 1), S101 -S106 & 2003 FNCLCC rate) should be evaluated in large randomised clinical trials (recommendation, expert agreement). [/fig]
[fig] Figure 3: Management of patients with denutrition detected during pretransplantation assessment. [/fig]
[fig] Figure 4: Management of patients with no denutrition detected during pretransplantation assessment Nutritional support in patients undergoing BMT B Raynard et al S105 British Journal of Cancer (2003) 89(Suppl 1), S101 -S106 & 2003 FNCLCC [/fig]
[table] Table 1: Definition of 'Standards, Options and Recommendations' [/table]
[table] Table 2: Definition of level of evidence [/table]