2010 Consensus Statement on the Worldwide Standardization of the Hemoglobin A1C Measurement

2010 Consensus Statement on the Worldwide Standardization of the Hemoglobin A1C Measurement ON BEHALF OF THE INTERNATIONAL HBA 1C CONSENSUS COMMITTEE*
MDFRCPATH2010 Consensus Statement on the Worldwide Standardization of the Hemoglobin A1C Measurement ON BEHALF OF THE INTERNATIONAL HBA 1C CONSENSUS COMMITTEE*
10.2337/dc10-0953
G lycated hemoglobin concentrations (most commonly hemoglobin A1C; HbA 1c ) reflect time-averaged blood glucose during the previous 2-3 months and are used as the gold standard for longterm follow-up of glycemic control. Standardization with common calibration was first proposed in 1984 [bib_ref] A comparative evaluation of glycosylated haemoglobin assays: feasibility of references and standards, Peterson [/bib_ref]. It was only after the publication of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) study in 1993, however, that the issue of international standardization of HbA 1c measurements became an important objective for scientists and clinicians. At that time, the lack of international standardization resulted in several countries developing National standardization programs; most notable of these are:
- in the U.S., the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP), with the DCCT HPLC method used as the primary reference method; - in Sweden, with the Mono S ion exchange chromatography designated as the comparison method; - in Japan, with use of common calibrators (six calibrators available for use) with HbA 1c values assigned by the Japan Diabetes Society.
A common feature of these national programs is the absence of primary and secondary reference materials. To overcome this lack of reference materials, achieve global standardization, and meet the requirements of the European Union directive on in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices, the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) established a Working Group on HbA 1c Standardization to develop a reference measurement system within the concept of metrological traceability. Such a system has been developed consisting of incubation with the enzyme endoproteinase Glu-C, cleavage of the NH 2 -terminal hexapeptide of the -chain, and separation and quantification of glycated and nonglycated hexapeptides by mass spectrometry or capillary electrophoresis (3). The analyte measured is a hemoglobin molecule having a stable adduct of glucose to the NH 2 -terminal valine of the hemoglobin -chain (N-1-deoxyfructosylhemoglobin). Pure HbA 1c and pure HbA 0 are isolated from human blood and mixed in well-defined proportions to produce a certified primary reference material set used to calibrate the primary reference measurement system (PRMS). The PRMS values are assigned to secondary reference materials (SRMs; whole blood), and the SRMs are used by the manufacturers to calibrate their instruments. A laboratory network has been established to implement and maintain the PRMS (4). Adopting the new IFCC standardization procedure will result in HbA 1c percentage values being lowered due to the higher specificity on the reference method. It has been suggested that lowering the percentage value of the HbA 1c reported may lead to poorer glycemic control in some patients [bib_ref] Psychological impact of changing the scale of reported HbA(1c) results affects metabolic..., Hanas [/bib_ref] , and IFCC has recommended the use of SI (Systeme International) units of mmol/mol, which would minimize the risk of confusion between IFCC percentage units and DCCT/ NGSP percentage units.
Expressing HbA 1c as an average glucose concentration has been widely discussed, as there is a convincing linear relationship between HbA 1c and average glucose concentration in both adults (7) and children. Nevertheless, not all population groups have been evaluated adequately.
Clinicians and scientists have unanimously welcomed the use of the IFCC reference method for calibration purposes, and the implementation of this standardization process is ongoing. There has been a considerable debate, however, regarding the number issue, i.e., whether HbA 1c should be expressed in percentage units related to the DCCT study or mmol/mol related to the IFCC method. There is an evident need to keep doctors, nurses, and people with diabetes educated to ensure a worldwide understanding of previously reported and upcoming scientific HbA 1c results. A first consensus meeting was held in 2007 (9 -10), where it was decided that the new IFCC reference system for HbA 1c represents the only valid anchor to implement standardization of the measurement, and that HbA 1c results were to be reported worldwide in IFCC units (mmol/mol) and derived NGSP units (%), using the IFCC-NGSP master equation.
A second consensus meeting was held at the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) meeting in Montreal on 21 October 2009. The American Diabetes Association (ADA), the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), the IDF, the IFCC, and the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) were represented at that meeting, as well as some editors from medical journals, and the following statements were approved by these organizations: material are strongly recommended to require that submitted manuscripts report HbA 1c in both SI (IFCC) and NGSP/DCCT units. 6. The reportable term for glycated hemoglobin is HbA 1c , although other abbreviations may be used in guidelines and educational material (A1C). 7. The above consensus recommendations apply through 2011, when they will be discussed again at the next consensus meeting at the IDF meeting in Dubai, December 2011.
HbA 1c -derived average glucose values (ADAGs) calculated from the HbA 1c results were not included in the consensus due to the above-mentioned limitations of this procedure. However, the use of an estimated average glucose (eAG) (7) in discussion with an individual patient may add to the consultation process, and the availability of such estimation may be advantageous. Agreement should be reached at a local level on how to make this estimation available. In a world of increased communication, and with the ever-increasing availability of information that both lay people and professionals may access via the Internet, it is inevitable that scientific results from studies such as the DCCT will be brought to the attention of interested individuals for decades to come. By report-ing in both IFCC and DCCT units, ongoing continuity between these reporting systems will be ensured. The submission of manuscripts containing both units will facilitate the alignment of the various HbA 1c methods, as the master equation will be used in the laboratory instruments for calculating the DCCT units, i.e., both the IFCC units and the DCCT units will have the same basis. It is therefore of vital importance that all laboratories and other users of instruments for measuring HbA 1c , either in the laboratory or at the point of care, take part in quality control and quality assessment programs to ensure accurate results (individual countries will vary in the way this is performed). We hope that the recommendation of dual reporting in submitted manuscripts will be adopted promptly by all scientific journals publishing diabetes articles.