Ideal treatment timing of orthodontic anomaliesa German clinical S3 practice guideline



## Bernabe e, sheiham
[fig] 132 Oral[: Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 112(6): e75-80. doi: 133 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.024 134 46. Borzabadi-Farahani A, Lane CJ, Yen SL (2014) Late maxillary protraction in patients 135 with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a retrospective study. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 136 51(1): e1-e10. doi: 10.1597/12-099 137 47. Bourdiol P, Soulier-Peigue D, Lachaze P et al. (2017) Only severe malocclusion 138 correlates with mastication deficiency. Arch. Oral Biol. 75: 14-20. doi: 139 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.12.002 140 48. Bucci R, Montanaro D, Rongo R et al. (2019) Effects of maxillary expansion on the 141 upper airways: Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. [Review]. Journal 142 of Oral Rehabilitation 46(4): 377-387. doi: 10.1111/joor.12766 143 49. Burden DJ (1995) An investigation of the association between overjet size, lip coverage, 144 and traumatic injury to maxillary incisors. Eur. J. Orthodont. 17(6): 513-517. doi: 145 10.1093/ejo/17.6.513 146 50. Buyuknacar GB, Gulec A (2020) Correlation between the cephalometric measurements 147 and acoustic properties of /s/ sound in Turkish. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 28: e20190399. doi: 148 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0399 149 51. Cacciatore G, Ghislanzoni LT, Alvetro L et al. (2014) Treatment and posttreatment 150 effects induced by the Forsus appliance: A controlled clinical study. Angle Orthodontist 151 84(6): 1010-1017. doi: 10.2319/112613-867.1 152 52. Chadwick SM, Aird JC, Taylor PJ et al. (2001) Functional regulator treatment of Class II 153 division 1 malocclusions. Eur. J. Orthodont. 23(5): 495-505. doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.5.495 154 53. Chatzoudi MI, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Papadopoulos MA (2014) Clinical effectiveness 155 of chin cup treatment for the management of Class III malocclusion in pre-pubertal 156 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [Review]. Progress in Orthodontics 157 15: 62. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0062-9 158 54. Chen DR, McGorray SP, Dolce C et al. (2011) Effect of early Class II treatment on the 159 incidence of incisor trauma. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial 160 Orthopedics 140(4): e155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.023 161 55. Chen X, Liu D, Liu J et al. (2015) Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Upper Airway 162 Morphological Changes in Growing Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion 163 Treated by Protraction Headgear and Rapid Palatal Expansion: Choi T-H, Kim B-I, Chung CJ et al. (2015) Assessment of masticatory function in 168 patients with non-sagittal occlusal discrepancies. J. Oral Rehabil. Cordasco G, Matarese G, Rustico L et al. (2014) Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with 174 protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-175 analysis. [Review]. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 17(3): 133-143. doi: 176 10.1111/ocr.12040 177 60. Correa-Faria P, Martins CC, Bonecker M et al. (2016) Clinical factors and socio-178 demographic characteristics associated with dental trauma in children: a systematic 179 review and meta-analysis. Dent Traumatol 32(5): 367-378. doi: 10.1111/edt.12268 180 61. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Mucedero M et al. (2010) Treatment and posttreatment effects of a 181 facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion. American 182 Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 138(3): 300-310. doi: 183 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.001 184 62. Cozza P, De,Toffol,L, Colagrossi S (2004) Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile 185 changes during activator therapy. European Journal of Orthodontics 26(3): 293-302 186 63. Croft RS, Buschang PH, English JD et al. (1999) A cephalometric and tomographic 187 evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition. American Journal of Orthodontics 188 & Dentofacial Orthopedics 116(4): 435-443 189 64. Danaei SM, Ajami S, Etemadi H et al. (2018) Assessment of the effect of maxillary 190 protraction appliance on pharyngeal airway dimensions in relation to changes in tongue 191 posture. Dental Research Journal 15(3): 208-214 192 65. de,Almeida,MR, Flores-Mir C, Brandao AG et al. (2008) Soft tissue changes produced 193 by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients. De,Clerck,H, Cevidanes L, Baccetti T (2010) Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored 196 maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients. Review]. European Journal of Orthodontics 37(3): 238-247. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju046 211 71. Dogan S (2012) The effects of face mask therapy in cleft lip and palate patients. Annals 212 of Maxillofacial Surgery 2(2): 116-120. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.101332 213 72. Dorri M (2015) In children with prominent lower front teeth (class III malocclusion), 214 how does orthodontic treatment affect outcomes? Cochrane Clinical Answers. doi: 215 10.1002/cca.996 216 73. Doshi UH, Bhad-Patil WA (2011) Speech defect and orthodontics: a contemporary 217 review. Orthodontics : The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement 12(4): 340-353 218 74. Duarte-Rodrigues L, Ramos-Jorge ML, Alves-Duarte AC et al. (2020) Oral disorders 219 associated with the experience of verbal bullying among Brazilian school-aged children: 220 A case-control study. Journal of the American Dental Association 151(6): 399-406. doi: 221 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.02.001 222 75. Ehmer U, Tulloch CJ, Proffit WR et al. (1999) An international comparison of early 223 treatment of angle Class-II/1 cases. Skeletal effects of the first phase of a prospective 224 clinical trial. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 60(6): 392-408 225 76. Eissa O, ElShennawy M, Gaballah S et al. (2018) Treatment of Class III malocclusion 226 using miniscrew-anchored inverted Forsus FRD: Controlled clinical trial. Angle 227 Orthodontist 88(6): 692-701. doi: 10.2319/110717-760.1 228 77. Eissa O, El-Shennawy M, Gaballah S et al. (2017) Treatment outcomes of Class II 229 malocclusion cases treated with miniscrew-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A 230 randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthodontist 87(6): 824-833. doi: 10.Elfeky HY, Fayed MS, AlHammadi MS et al. (2018) Three-dimensional skeletal, 233 dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional 234 appliance. J. Orofac. Orthop. 79(4): 245-258. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0137-1 235 79. ElKordy SA, Abouelezz AM, Fayed MM et al. (2016) Three-dimensional effects of the 236 mini-implant-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial. [/fig]
[fig] 364: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 146(6): 776-785. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.08.Janson GR, da,Silva,CC, Bergersen EO et al. (2000) Eruption Guidance Appliance 372 effects in the treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusions. American Journal of 373 Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 117(2): 119-129 374 125. Janson GR, Toruno JL, Martins DR et al. (2003) Class II treatment effects of the Frankel 375 appliance. European Journal of Orthodontics 25(3): 301-309 376 126. Jarvinen S (1978) Incisal overjet and traumatic injuries to upper permanent incisors. Jarvinen S (1979) Traumatic injuries to upper permanent incisors related to age and 380 incisal overjet. A retrospective study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 37(6): 335-338. 381 doi: 10.3109/00016357909004705 382 128. Javidi H, Vettore M, Benson PE (2017) Does orthodontic treatment before the age of 18 383 years improve oral health-related quality of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis. 384 Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 151(4): 644-655. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.011 385 129. Jena AK, Duggal R (2010) Treatment Effects of Twin-Block and Mandibular Protraction 386 Appliance-IV in the Correction of Class II Malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 80(3): 485-491. 387 doi: 10.2319/062709-359.1 388 130. Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H (2006) Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block 389 and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study. [/fig]
[fig] 439: Surg. 39(4): 260-265. doi: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0576 440 147. Koike S, Sujino T, Ohmori H et al. (2013) Gastric emptying rate in subjects with 441 malocclusion examined by (13) C breath test. J. Oral Rehabil. 40(8): 574-581. doi: 442 10.1111/joor.12073 443 148. Kragt L, Dhamo B, Wolvius EB et al. (2016) The impact of malocclusions on oral 444 health-related quality of life in children-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral 445 Investig. 20(8): 1881-1894. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1681Kunz F, Platte P, Ke S et al. (2018) Correlation between oral health-related quality of 452 life and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents-Impact of specific orthodontic parameters on the oral health-related quality of life in 462 children and adolescents : A prospective interdisciplinary, multicentre, cohort study). J 463 Orofac Orthop 80(4): 174-183. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00181-x 464 153. LaHaye MB, Buschang PH, Alexander RG et al. (2006) Orthodontic treatment changes 465 of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients. American Journal of Orthodontics & 466 Dentofacial Orthopedics 130(6): 732-741 467 154. Lange DW, Kalra V, Broadbent,BH,Jr et al. (1995) Changes in soft tissue profile 468 following treatment with the bionator. Angle Orthodontist 65(6): 423-430 469 155. Laranjo F, Pinho T (2014) Cephalometric study of the upper airways and dentoalveolar 470 height in open bite patients. International Orthodontics 12(4): 467-482. doi: 471 10.1016/j.ortho.2014.10.005 472 156. Latkauskiene D, Jakobsone G (2012) Immediate post-treatment crowned Herbst effects 473 in growing patients. Stomatologija 14(3): 89-92 474 157. Lee D-H, Yu H-S (2012) Masseter muscle changes following orthognathic surgery A 475 long-term three-dimensional computed tomography follow-up. Angle Orthod. 476 82(5): 792-798. doi: 10.2319/111911-717.1 477 158. Lee W-C, Tu Y-K, Huang C-S et al. (2018) Pharyngeal airway changes following 478 maxillary expansion or protraction: A meta-analysis. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 21(1): 4-479 11. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12208 480 159. Levin AS, McNamara,JA,Jr, Franchi L et al. (2008) Short-term and long-term treatment 481 outcomes with the FR-3 appliance of Frankel. American Journal of Orthodontics & 482 Dentofacial Orthopedics 134(4): 513-524. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.036 483 160. Li L, Liu H, Cheng H et al. (2014) CBCT evaluation of the upper airway morphological 484 changes in growing patients of class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular retrusion 485 using twin block appliance: a comparative research. PLoS ONE [Electronic Resource] 486 9(4): e94378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.JA, Mokrys K, Kinzinger GS et al. (2013) Changes in soft-tissue profiles after 494 treatment of class II/1 patients with bite-jumping appliances. ZP, Li CJ, Hu HK et al. (2011) Efficacy of short-term chincup therapy for 500 mandibular growth retardation in Class III malocclusion. [Review]. Lombardo G, Vena F, Negri P et al. (2020) Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in the 503 different stages of dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Paediatr. 504 Dent. 21(2): 115-122. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2020.21.02.05 505 167. Lucchese A, Carinci F, Brunelli G (2012) SKELETAL EFFECTS INDUCED BY TWIN 506 BLOCK IN THERAPY OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. Eur. J. Inflamm. 10(1): 83-507 87 508 168. Lund DI, Sandler PJ (1998) The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study. [/fig]