Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules state that percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA or 
Kyphoplasty) procedures will be considered medically reasonable and necessary for the following indications: 
 
    Painful, debilitating, osteoporotic vertebral collapse/compression fractures, defined as those that have not 
responded to non-surgical medical management (e.g., narcotic and/or non- narcotic medication, physical 
therapy modalities) with and without methods of immobility (e.g., rest, bracing). 
        Both PVP and PVA will be considered reasonable and necessary when ALL of the following criteria are 
met: 
            Acute (<6 wks) or subacute (6-12 wks)18,28,42 osteoporotic VCF (T1 L5), based on symptom onset, 
and documented by advanced imaging demonstrating bone marrow edema on MRI or bone-scan/SPECT/CT 
uptake 1-3,8,26,43 and 
            The beneficiary is symptomatic and is hospitalized with severe pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] or 
Visual Analog Scale [VAS] pain score = 8)4-7 or is non-hospitalized with moderate to severe pain (NRS or 
VAS =5) despite optimal non-surgical management (NSM)8 with one of the following: 
                Worsening Pain or 
                Stable to improved pain (but NRS or VAS =5) when 2 or more of the following are present: 
                    Progression of vertebral body height loss 
                    > 25% vertebral body height reduction 
                    Kyphotic deformity 
                    Severe impact of VCF on daily functioning (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RDQ] >17) 
 
Continuum of care: All patients presenting with vertebral compression fractures (VCF) should be referred for 
evaluation of bone mineral density and osteoporosis education for subsequent treatment as indicated and 
instructed to take part in an osteoporosis prevention/treatment program.8 
 
    Malignant Vertebral Fractures 
 
Osteolytic vertebral metastasis or myeloma with severe back pain related to a destruction of the vertebral body, 
not involving the major part of the cortical bone.  
Limitations 
 
    Exclusion criteria 2,5,8-10,28,31 
        Absolute contraindication 
            Current back pain is not primarily due to the identified acute or subacute VCF(s). 
            Osteomyelitis, discitis or active systemic infection 
            Pregnancy 
            Active surgical site infection 
 
        Relative contraindication 
            Greater than three vertebral fractures per procedure 
            Allergy to bone cement or opacification agents 
            Uncorrected coagulopathy 
            Spinal instability 
            Myelopathy from the fracture 
            Neurologic deficit 
            Neural impingement 
            Fracture retropulsion/canal compromise 
 
You can find this information in the Local Coverage Determination (LCD) Percutaneous Vertebral 
Augmentation (PVA) for Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) L34976. 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com.