Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is coverage for Tacrolimus 1 milligram capsule prescribed for kidney transplant rejection prophylaxis. The Part D plan denied the request for coverage.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all available documentation. Additionally, we researched Medicare systems.Medicare systems show that the enrollee was eligible for Medicare Part A coverage from May 1, 2015, through May 31, 2018. Therefore, the enrollee was eligible for Medicare Part A coverage when undergoing a kidney transplant on May 12, 2015. If the enrollee was eligible for Medicare Part A coverage on the date of the transplant, immunosuppressive drugs prescribed for transplant rejection prophylaxis would be covered under Medicare Part B. Medicare rules state that any drug available for coverage under Medicare Part B cannot be covered under Part D. Therefore, the requested drug is not eligible for Medicare Part D coverage.This decision does not address the medical necessity of the drug. It only establishes that payment cannot be made under the Medicare Part D benefit. Please submit the request for coverage through Medicare Part B.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is coverage for Octagam 100 milligram per milliliter injection to treat livedoid vasculitis. The Part D plan denied the request for coverage.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all available documentation. In order for a drug to be covered by Medicare Part D, it must be prescribed for a medically accepted indication outlined in the Medicare approved compendia. The use of the requested drug to treat the noted condition is an off-label use. The Medicare-approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, as prescribed, for the treatment of this condition. Therefore, the drug is being prescribed for a non-medically accepted indication.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Favorable

At issue is coverage for Dupixent 300 milligram per 2 milliliter pen injector to treat bullous pemphigoid. The Part D plan denied the request for coverage. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all available documentation.In order for a drug to be covered by Medicare Part D, it must be prescribed for a medically accepted indication outlined in the Medicare approved compendia. The Medicare approved compendium, DrugDex, includes an off-label citation for the use of the requested drug to treat bullous pemphigoid. Therefore, the requested drug is being prescribed to treat a medically accepted indication.The plan has prior authorization requirements that must be met before coverage of this drug is provided. However, the plans prior authorization requirements are diagnosis-specific and not related to the condition being treated. Since the condition being treated is a medically accepted indication outlined in DrugDex, an exception to the plans diagnosis-specific coverage requirements is supported.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is coverage for Refresh Optive Solution Mega 3, 0.5/1/0.5 percent eye drops in droperette to treat the enrollees condition. The Part D plan denied the request for coverage. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all available documentation.Refresh Optive Solution Mega 3 is available over the counter without a prescription. Drugs available without a prescription, even when a prescription has been written, are excluded from coverage under Medicare Part D. Therefore, the requested drug is excluded from Medicare Part D coverage. This decision does not address the medical necessity of the drug. It only establishes that payment cannot be made under the Medicare Part D benefit.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is coverage for Cresemba 186 milligram capsule to treat unspecified, coccidioidomycosis, pulmonary mycobacterial infection, latent tuberculosis, kidney transplant patient with multiple pulmonary infections, and non tuberculous mycobacterium. The Part D plan denied the request for coverage.  We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all available documentation. In order for a drug to be covered by Medicare Part D, it must be prescribed for a medically accepted indication outlined in the Medicare approved compendia. The use of the requested drug to treat the noted condition is an off-label use. The Medicare-approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, as prescribed, for the treatment of this condition. Therefore, the drug is being prescribed for a non-medically accepted indication. A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Favorable

At issue is coverage for Repatha 140 milligram per milliliter auto injector to treat atherosclerosis of coronary artery with post percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The Part D plan auto-forwarded the case to us for review.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all available documentation.The plan has prior authorization requirements for this drug that must be met before coverage will be provided. The submitted documentation supports that all of the plans requirements for coverage have been satisfied. Specifically, the prescriber who is a cardiologist has indicated the enrollee is intolerant of statins. The enrollee is not on statins due a long-documented history of intolerance and listed as an allergy in medical records. Therefore, the plans prior authorization requirements have been met and coverage for the drug is supported.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is coverage for Rybelsus 7 mg tablet to treat not provided . The Part D plan auto-forwarded the case to us for review.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all available documentation.During this review, we requested additional information from the prescriber. Specifically, we requested medical records and a prescriber statement to support that the enrollee has satisfied the plans prior authorization coverage criteria. However, the prescriber did not respond to our request,In order for a drug to be covered by Medicare Part D, it must be prescribed for a medically accepted indication outlined in the Medicare approved compendia. The submitted documentation does not include medical records or evidence of a prescribed diagnosis. This information was requested by the Part D plan with no response from the prescriber. As such, there is insufficient documentation available to establish that the requested drug has been prescribed for a medically accepted indication.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is coverage for Metaxalone 800 milligram tablet to treat muscle spasm of back. The Part D plan auto-forwarded the case to us for review.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all available documentation.The requested drug is not on the plans formulary. To grant an exception for a drug that is not on the plans formulary, alternative formulary drugs must have been tried and failed or must be deemed contraindicated. In this case, the prescriber has not provided patient-specific clinical rationale as to why the alternative drugs on the plans formulary to treat the enrollees condition would likely not be as effective as the requested drug and/or would likely cause adverse reactions or other harm. Additionally, the submitted documentation does not support that the enrollee has tried and failed all of the formulary alternative drugs. Therefore, the formulary exception requirements have not been met.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride 500 milligram tablet for an unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan auto-forwarded the case to us for review.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all available documentation.The plans Evidence of Coverage states, if the enrollee pays the full cost of a prescription, then they may submit a request for reimbursement with proof of payment to ask the plan to pay its share of the cost. In this case, proof of payment in the form of a receipt showing the amount that was paid for the drug was not provided. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide reimbursement.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Prednisolone Acetate 1 percent ophthalmic 5 milliliter solution prescribed for an unspecified diagnosis. The Part D plan auto-forwarded the enrollees request for reimbursement.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The plans Evidence of Coverage indicates reimbursement is calculated based on the total cost of the drug, minus the required copayment or coinsurance amount, and minus the difference between what the plan approves for the drug and what the pharmacy charges. The pharmacy documents labeled receipt indicate the amount charged was for a co-pay. We determined no reimbursement is required by the plan as the enrollee is responsible for the co-pay of medication costs.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Favorable

At issue is Shingrix 0.5 milliliter injection prescribed for vaccination. The Part D plan auto-forwarded the case to us for review.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all available documentation.The submitted documentation shows the enrollee received the vaccine at the prescriber's office. The plans Evidence of Coverage states that payment for vaccines including administration fee is required up front from the enrollee when provided at an out of network pharmacy or prescribers office. If an enrollee pays the full cost of a prescription, the enrollee may submit a request for reimbursement with proof of payment to ask the plan to pay its share of the cost. The enrollee provided a statement from the prescribers office and a receipt indicating full payment was made for the vaccine and administration fee. Therefore, we determined the reimbursement criteria have been met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Paxlovid 150 milligram per 100 milligram tablet. The Part D plan denied the request for reimbursement.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The submitted documentation shows the enrollee requested the Part D plan to provide reimbursement for the requested drug provided while on a cruise ship. Drugs purchased on a cruise ship are considered foreign claims outside of the United States and are excluded from coverage. In addition, the physician that prescribed the drug does not have an active National Provider Identification number on file. Therefore, we determined the reimbursement criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Albuterol Sulfate Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) date of service 5/28/202 and 6/1/2021, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.At issue is Albuterol Sulfate Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) date of service 3/4/2022, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The plan submitted documentation that shows the enrollee was still in the deductible stage of the Part D benefit when the requested drug was purchased. The plans Evidence of Coverage states that the enrollee is responsible for the full cost of covered drugs until the deductible amount is satisfied. We determined this drug was paid correctly and no reimbursement is required by the plan.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Alprazolam 0.5 milligram tablet date of service 8/5/2020, 9/2/2020, 12/11/2020, 2/3/2021, 3/24/2021, 5/8/2021, 9/13/2021, and 5/26/2023, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.At issue is Alprazolam 0.5 milligram tablet date of service 3/14/2022, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The plan submitted documentation that shows the enrollee was still in the deductible stage of the Part D benefit when the requested drug was purchased. The plans Evidence of Coverage states that the enrollee is responsible for the full cost of covered drugs until the deductible amount is satisfied. We determined this drug was paid correctly and no reimbursement is required by the plan.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Armodafinil 200 milligram tablet date of service 10/28/2020, 12/7/2020, 12/11/2020, 2/2/2021, 3/25/2021, 5/27/2021, 9/19/2021, and 5/30/2023, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.At issue is Armodafinil 200 milligram tablet date of service 8/13/2022 and 12/2/2022, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The plan submitted documentation that shows the enrollee was still in the deductible stage of the Part D benefit when the requested drug was purchased. The plans Evidence of Coverage states that the enrollee is responsible for the full cost of covered drugs until the deductible amount is satisfied. We determined this drug was paid correctly and no reimbursement is required by the plan.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Azithromycin 250 milligram tablet date of service 7/17/2021, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Cefdinir 300 milligram capsule date of service 7/17/2021, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Celecoxib 200 milligram tablet date of service 5/26/2023, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.At issue is Celecoxib 200 milligram tablet date of service 3/14/2022 and 9/14/2022, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The plan submitted documentation that shows the enrollee was still in the deductible stage of the Part D benefit when the requested drug was purchased. The plans Evidence of Coverage states that the enrollee is responsible for the full cost of covered drugs until the deductible amount is satisfied. We determined this drug was paid correctly and no reimbursement is required by the plan.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Colestipol Hydrochloride 1 gram tablet date of service 3/18/2021, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Cyanocobalamin 1000 microgram per milliliter solution date of service 6/12/2021, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Doxycycline Hyclate 100 milligram tablet date of service 7/23/2021, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Ferrous Sulfate 325 (65 Fe) milligram tablet date of service 3/18/2021, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 5/325 milligram tablet date of service 6/01/2022, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The plan submitted documentation that shows the enrollee was still in the deductible stage of the Part D benefit when the requested drug was purchased. The plans Evidence of Coverage states that the enrollee is responsible for the full cost of covered drugs until the deductible amount is satisfied. We determined this drug was paid correctly and no reimbursement is required by the plan.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Hydroxyzine Hydrochloride 50 milligram tablet date of service 1/7/2021, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Metoprolol Tartrate 25 milligram tablet date of service 12/10/2020, prescribed for unknown diagnosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare records show the enrollee was not enrolled with the Part D plan for the dates of service requested. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to provide coverage or reimbursement for the requested drug.