Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Methylphenidate 20 milligram tablets prescribed to treat other fatigue and major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features. The Part D plan denied your request. We received a reconsideration request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. We also researched Medicare regulations and Medicare approved compendia. The Medicare approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, as prescribed, for the treatment of the enrollees condition. The drug is not approved by the food and drug administration to treat the diagnoses submitted. Therefore, the requested drug is not eligible for coverage under Medicare Part D.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover Methylphenidate.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a tiering exception request for Ipratropium Bromide nasal spray 0.06% to treat vasomotor rhinitis.   The Part D plan denied the request.  We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Ipratropium Bromide nasal spray 0.06%  is a generic drug on Tier 3 of the plans formulary. The prescriber has not indicated if all alternatives required by the plan have been tried and failed, or why the plans lower tiered drugs would likely not be as effective as the requested drug.  Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.Our physician reviewer's opinion is that tiering exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a tiering exception request for Gabapentin 300 milligram capsules to treat neuropathy.   The Part D plan denied the request.  We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Gabapentin 300 milligram capsule is a generic drug on Tier 2 of the plans formulary. There are no generic drugs of the same type on the lower tiers of the plans formulary to treat the same condition. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.Our physician reviewer's opinion is that tiering exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Brilinta 90 milligram tablets prescribed as directed. The Part D plan denied your request for a tiering exception.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Brilinta is a brand drug on Tier 3 of the plans formulary. There are no brand drugs of the same type on the lower cost sharing tiers. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to grant your request for a tiering exception.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Hetlioz 20 milligram to treat non-24 hour sleep-wake disorder. The Part D plan denied the request. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The documentation provided addressed the plans coverage criteria and those criteria were not satisfied. A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested a tier exception for Tradjenta 5 milligram tablets prescribed daily for diabetes. The Part D plan denied your request for a tiering exception because Tradjenta is a brand name Tier 3 drug and the lower cost-sharing tiers only contain generic alternative drugs. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. We also researched Medicare systems and reviewed the enrollment data available. The plan shows Tradjenta is a brand name Tier 3 drug. There are no brand name drugs of the same type on the lower cost sharing levels. Therefore, the requested drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Dronabinol to treat nausea and vomiting secondary to gastroparesis. The Part D plan denied the request stating that the provided diagnosis is a non-medically accepted indication. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The use of the requested drug to treat the provided diagnosis is an off-label use. The Medicare approved compendia does not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, as prescribed, for the treatment of this condition. Therefore, the requested drug is not eligible for coverage under Medicare Part D.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Methylphenidate hydrochloride 10 milligram tablets prescribed as directed. The Part D plan denied your request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. We asked your prescriber to send us a supporting statement and medical records to show why Methylphenidate hydrochloride is medically necessary. However, we did not receive the documentation.No medical records were provided by the prescriber to support the enrollees diagnosis. It could not be determined whether the requested drug was being prescribed for a medically accepted indication. Therefore, the requested drug is not eligible for coverage under Medicare Part D.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover Methylphenidate hydrochloride.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Leflunomide 20 milligram tablets prescribed as directed for rheumatoid arthritis. The Part D plan denied your request for a tiering exception.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Leflunomide is a generic drug on Tier 3 of the plans formulary. Your doctor did not address why both of the medications on Tier 2 would not work for you. All generic drugs on lower tiers have not been tried. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to grant your request for a tiering exception.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a tiering exception request for Incruse Ellipta 62.5 microgram inhaler to treat the enrollees condition. The Part D plan denied the request. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.This drug is being provided by the plan under a formulary exception. It is not on the plans formulary but they have agreed to provide it at a cost sharing level assigned to all formulary exceptions. Per Medicare rules, non-formulary drugs are not eligible for a tiering exception.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Descovy 200-25milligram tablets. The Part D plan denied your request for a tiering exception because the drug you requested is in the specialty tier; drugs placed in the specialty tier are not eligible for tiering exceptions. We received a reconsideration request.  We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. This drug is being provided by the plan at the cost sharing level of the Specialty tier. Specialty tier drugs are not available for a tiering exception per Medicare rules. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that a tiering exception cannot be granted for a drug on the specialty tier of this plan.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Xeljanz XR 11milligrams tablets to treat seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. The Part D plan denied your request to cover this drug at a lower tier cost. The plan indicated this is a non-formulary approved drug and cannot be provided at a lower tier cost. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The record shows Xeljanz XR was prescribed; however, Xeljanz XR is a non-formulary approved drug and is not eligible for a tiering exception. A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to grant a tiering exception for the Xeljanz XR.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Xalatan Ophthalmic Solution to the enrollees condition. This case was auto-forwarded.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed your appeal carefully. We reviewed all documentation available.The physician submitted a supporting statement. The prescriber statement indicates that the enrollee has tried and failed with formulary alternatives. However, medical records have not been submitted for review. Therefore, the documentation available does not support the enrollee has satisfied the plan's coverage criteria.Our physician reviewer's opinion is that formulary exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Tymlos 80 microgram dose pen injector prescribed daily for osteopenia. The Part D plan denied the request stating that the provided diagnosis is a non-medically accepted indication. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Your medical records show your doctor prescribed Tymlos to treat osteopenia. However, the Medicare approved compendia do not support the use of this drug for your condition. A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover Tymlos.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Restasis 0.05 percent eye solution prescribed daily for dry eye syndrome. The Part D plan denied your request for a tiering exception. We received a reconsideration request. We performed and independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Restasis is a brand drug on Tier 3 of the plans formulary. There are no brand drugs of the same type on the lower cost sharing tiers. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to grant your request for a tiering exception.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Dupixent 300 milligram/2 milliliter to treat severe persistent asthma. The Part D plan denied the request.  The requested drug is not on the plans formulary. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The prescriber provided patient specific clinical rationale supported by medical records. However, the documentation does not include all alternatives required by the plan would likely not be as effective as the requested drug; and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm. Therefore, an exception to the plans formulary coverage criteria is not supported. Our physician reviewer's opinion is that formulary exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Corlanor to treat coronary artery disease and ischemic cardiomyopathy. The Part D plan denied the request stating that the provided diagnosis is a non-medically accepted indication. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The use of the requested drug to treat the provided diagnosis is an off-label use. The Medicare approved compendia does not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, as prescribed, for the treatment of this condition. Therefore, the requested drug is not eligible for coverage under Medicare Part D.  Also note that the left ventricular ejection fraction from the office note dated 3/3/2021 is 50%.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Amphetamine/Dextroamphetamine 20 milligrams tablets. The Part D plan denied a request for this drug. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The physician submitted a supporting statement. The prescriber statement indicates that Amphetamine/Dextroamphetamine is prescribed to treat hypersomnia with severe obstructive sleep apnea. However, the Medicare approved compendia do not support the use of this specific drug for the enrollees condition(s).A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to Amphetamine/Dextroamphetamine.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Odactra Sublingual Tablet prescribed to treat dust mite allergy. The Part D plan denied your request. We received a reconsideration request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. We also researched Medicare regulations and Medicare approved compendia. The Medicare approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, as prescribed, for the treatment of the enrollees condition. Therefore, the requested drug is not eligible for coverage under Medicare Part D.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover Odactra.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Omega 3 Acid Ethyl Esters 2 grams twice daily prescribed to treat pure hypercholesterolemia. The Part D plan denied your request. We received a reconsideration request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. We also researched Medicare regulations and Medicare approved compendia. The Medicare approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, as prescribed, for the treatment of the enrollees condition. The drug is not approved by the food and drug administration to treat the diagnoses submitted. Therefore, the requested drug is not eligible for coverage under Medicare Part D.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover Omega 3 Acid Ethyl Esters.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Dapsone 5% cream to treat acne. The Part D plan denied the request. The requested drug is not on the plans formulary. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The prescriber has not provided patient specific clinical rationale, supported by medical records, as to why all alternatives required by the plan would likely not be as effective as the requested drug; and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm. Therefore, an exception to the plans formulary coverage criteria is not supported. Our physician reviewer's opinion is that formulary exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a tiering exception request for Brimonidine tartrate 0.15% solution prescribed as directed to treat the enrollees condition. The Part D plan denied the request. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Brimonidine tartrate is a generic drug on Tier 3 of the plans formulary. The prescriber has not indicated that you have tried all alternatives required by the plan, or why the plans lower tiered drugs would likely not be as effective as the requested drug. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.Our physician reviewer's opinion is that tiering exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Calcipotriene Ointment for psoriasis. The Part D plan denied the request because it does not meet the criteria of a medically accepted indication. The plan requires prior authorization before covering some prescription drugs. If prior approval is not obtained, the plan may not cover the drug. We received a reconsideration request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Your medical records show your doctor prescribed the requested drug to treat psoriasis. However, the enrollee does not satisfy the plan's prior authorization coverage criteria. There was no documentation provided that supports you had an inadequate response, intolerance, or contraindication to a generic topical steroid.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover the requested drug.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Anoro Ellipta 62.5-25 microgram oral inhalation to treat centrilobular emphysema. The Part D plan denied the request.  The requested drug is not on the plans formulary. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The prescriber provided patient specific clinical rationale supported by medical records. However, the documentation does not include all alternatives required by the plan would likely not be as effective as the requested drug; and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm. Therefore, an exception to the plans formulary coverage criteria is not supported. Our physician reviewer's opinion is that formulary exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Auryxia 1 gram/210-milligram tablet to treat anemia. The Part D plan denied the request. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Drugs prescribed for use as vitamins and minerals are excluded from coverage under Medicare Part D. Therefore, the requested drug is excluded from coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Restasis Emulsion 0.05% prescribed daily for chronic dry eye. The Part D plan denied your request for a tiering exception. We received a reconsideration request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Restasis is a brand drug on Tier 3 of the plans formulary. Brand name drugs are eligible for tiering exceptions to the lowest applicable cost-sharing associated with brand name alternatives. There are no brand drugs of the same type on the lower cost sharing tiers to treat the enrollees condition. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to grant your request for a tiering exception.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested  Carisoprodol 350 milligram tablets twice daily to treat chronic pain related to fibromyalgia with severe spasms. The Part D plan denied your request.  We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. The records indicate that the Carisoprodol is being prescribed to treat chronic pain related to fibromyalgia with severe back spasms. However, the Medicare approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, as prescribed, for the treatment of the noted conditions. Therefore, the requested drug is being prescribed for non-medically accepted indications and is not eligible for coverage under Medicare Part D. A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover the Carisoprodol.