Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

Medicare rules require a Part D Plan to issue a decision regarding coverage within the specified timeframe.If the Plan does not make a timely decision, this is considered a denial. The Plan forwarded this case to usas required by Medicare rules because it did not make a timely decision.You asked the Plan to cover Verzenio. The Plan did not grant this request. We received this case to conductan independent review.We asked our Physician Reviewer to determine whether the Part D Plan was correct in denying the requestfor Verzenio. The drug is requested to treat breast cancer in combination with Tamoxifen, which is an offlabel(non-FDA approved) use.The enrollee is a 73 year old woman with metastatic hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breastcancer involving skin and bones. She has been treated with adjuvant Aromasin and Arimidex. Formetastatic disease, she has been treated with Fulvestrant plus Ibrance and with Olaparib on a clinical trial.She has also had Aromasin and Afinitor. She has progression of the cancerous skin rash. You requestVerzenio to be given with Tamoxifen to treat her. You state there are other options though the enrolleedeclines Xeloda pills and intravenous chemotherapy. An abstract was submitted in support of the request.Abstracts cannot be used to determine medically accepted use.The Medicare-approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, asprescribed, for treatment of the noted condition. There was no peer-reviewed, clinically relevant, medicalliterature from an approved journal submitted to support this appeal. Therefore, the requested drug is notbeing prescribed for a medically accepted indication as defined by Medicare law. As such, an exceptionsrequest based on medical necessity cannot be considered because the requested drug, as prescribed, doesnot meet the definition of a Medicare Part D drug. Therefore, the requested drug is not eligible for coverageunder Medicare Part D for the noted condition.For coverage under Part D, Medicare requires that the drug must be prescribed for a medically acceptedindication. For Part D drugs used in an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen, a medically acceptedindication means a use that is approved by the FDA or a use that is supported by one or more citations inMedicare approved compendia or peer-reviewed medical literature in CMS-approved journals orpublications.Our Physician Reviewer reviewed this file and determined that there are no citations in the Medicareapproved compendia and there was no peer-reviewed literature from an approved journal submitted tosupport the use of Verzenio for the diagnosed condition. As a result, the drug is not being prescribed for amedically accepted indication as defined by Medicare law. As such, it cannot be covered under theMedicare Part D benefit for this condition. An exceptions request based on medical necessity cannot beconsidered because this drug, as prescribed, does not meet the definition of a Medicare Part D drug.Therefore, our decision is that the Plan is not required to provide coverage for Verzenio.This decision does not concern the medical necessity of the requested drug. It only establishes if paymentcan be made under the Medicare Part D benefit.