Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Levothyroxine 100 microgram tablet. The Part D plan denied the request. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The enrollee is requesting reimbursement for Levothyroxine given as a self-administered drug, while in a hospital outpatient stay. We researched Medicare resources and found that the requested drug has a National Drug Code (NDC) listed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that indicates it is repackaged. Therefore, the drug is excluded from coverage under the Medicare Part D benefit and not eligible for reimbursement.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Oxybutynin 5 milligram tablet. The Part D plan denied the request. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The enrollee is requesting reimbursement for Oxybutynin given as a self-administered drug, while in a hospital outpatient stay. We researched Medicare resources and found that the requested drug has a National Drug Code (NDC) listed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that indicates it is repackaged. Therefore, the drug is excluded from coverage under the Medicare Part D benefit and not eligible for reimbursement.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Oxycodone 5 milligram tablet. The Part D plan denied the request. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The enrollee is requesting reimbursement for Oxycodone given as a self-administered drug, while in a hospital outpatient stay. We researched Medicare resources and found that the requested drug has a National Drug Code (NDC) listed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that indicates it is repackaged. Therefore, the drug is excluded from coverage under the Medicare Part D benefit and not eligible for reimbursement.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Pantoprazole delayed release 20 milligram tablet. The Part D plan denied the request. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The enrollee is requesting reimbursement for Pantoprazole given as a self-administered drug, while in a hospital outpatient stay. We researched Medicare resources and found that the requested drug has a National Drug Code (NDC) listed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that indicates it is repackaged. Therefore, the drug is excluded from coverage under the Medicare Part D benefit and not eligible for reimbursement.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Tetanus Diphtheria and Acellular Pertussis (TDAP) vaccine and administration fee. The Part D plan auto-forwarded the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The submitted documentation shows the enrollee was administered the requested drug for vaccination in the prescriber's office. The plans Evidence of Coverage states, if the enrollee pays the full cost of a prescription, then they may submit a request for reimbursement with proof of payment to ask the plan to pay its share of the cost. In this case, proof of payment in the form of a receipt or physician's statement showing the amount that was paid by the enrollee was not provided. Therefore, the reimbursement criteria have not been met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Humulin 70/30 100 unit solution prescribed for an unspecified diagnosis. The Part D plan auto-forwarded the enrollees request for additional reimbursement.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review of this request for coverage. We reviewed all documentation submitted for review, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The plan submitted documentation that shows the claims for the tier 3 drug were approved and copayment was charged to the enrollee at the point of sale for dates of fill January 1, 2022 through November 30, 2022. The plans Evidence of Coverage indicates reimbursement is calculated based on the total cost of the drug, minus the required copayment or coinsurance amount, and minus the difference between what the plan approves for the drug and what the pharmacy charges for the tier 3 drug, at the enrollee's cost share stage on the date of purchase. The enrollee was in the initial coverage stage and charged a copay for each date of service of $45.00, which is the lesser of the 15 percent of the total cost of the drug or copay for dates of fill January 1, 2022 through July 7, 2022. The enrollee transitioned into the Coverage Gap cost share stage for dates of fill August 8, 2022 through November 30, 2022 and was charged 15 percent of the plan approved cost of the drug. Therefore, we determined the copay's charged were correct and no further reimbursement is required by the plan.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Spironolactone 100 percent compounded powder prescribed to treat dry eye disease. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Drugs that fall into the category of bulk powders are excluded from coverage under Part D. In addition, over the counter drugs are excluded from coverage under Medicare Part D. The requested compounded drug includes both bulk powder ingredients and over the counter ingredients and is therefore, excluded from coverage and not eligible for reimbursement. This decision does not address the medical necessity or appropriateness of the requested drug. It only establishes if payment can be made under the Medicare Part D benefit.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Nubeqa 300 milligram tablets to treat metastatic castrate sensitive prostate cancer, not in combination with Docetaxel. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare-approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug as prescribed, for treatment of the noted diagnosis. There was no peer-reviewed, clinically relevant, medical literature from an approved journal submitted to support this appeal. Therefore, the requested drug is not being prescribed for a medically accepted indication as defined by Medicare.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Econazole Nitrate 1 percent cream to treat tinea pedis. The Part D plan denied the request. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.We requested additional information from the prescriber. Specifically, we requested medical records and a prescriber statement to support that all formulary alternatives were tried and failed or were contraindicated. We received additional documentation and included it in the review.The requested drug is not on the plans formulary. In order to grant an exception for a drug not on the plans formulary, alternative formulary drugs must have been tried, failed, or deemed contraindicated. In this case, the documentation does not support why the formulary alternatives, required by the plan would likely not be as effective for this diagnosis, and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Zeposia 0.92 milligram capsule to treat multiple sclerosis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The requested drug is not on the plans formulary. In order to grant an exception for a drug not on the plans formulary, alternative formulary drugs must have been tried, failed, or deemed contraindicated. In this case, the documentation does not support why the formulary alternatives, required by the plan would likely not be as effective for this diagnosis, and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm. A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a tiering exception request for Memantine Hydrochloride 5 milligram tablet to treat chronic migraine without aura, not intractable, without status migrainosus, other amnesia. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Memantine Hydrochloride 5 milligram table is a generic drug on Tier 3 of the plans formulary. There are no generic drugs of the same type on the lower tiers of the plans formulary to treat the same diagnosis. Additionally, the Medicare approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, as prescribed, for the treatment of this diagnosis. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.A physician reviewer determined that the tiering exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Zioptan 0.0015 percent solution. The Part D plan denied the request as an excluded drug in the Medicare Part D program.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.For the drug at issue to be covered under Medicare Part D, the manufacturer must participate in the Medicare Coverage Gap Discount Program. This manufacturer is not participating in the program; therefore, the drug is excluded from Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Favorable

At issue is coverage for Epclusa 400 milligram/100 milligram tablet, 28 tablets per 28 days, to treat chronic hepatitis C virus infection (genotype 1a or 1b without hepatic coma). The Part D plan denied the request for coverage.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.During this review, we requested additional information from the prescriber. Specifically, we requested medical records and a prescriber statement to support that the enrollee has satisfied the plans prior authorization coverage criteria. We received additional documentation and included it in the review. The newly submitted documentation satisfies the plans coverage criteria. The prescriber provided information for a treatment-native enrollee with genotype 1a or 1b hepatitis C that has been confirmed by presence of hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) in serum prior to start of treatment. Additionally, the medical records show that the enrollee does not have cirrhosis or decompensated cirrhosis; the enrollee does not have recurrent hepatitis C infection post liver transplantation; the requested drug will be used alone; and the enrollee has not received greater than or equal to 12 weeks of treatment with the requested medication. As such, the plan's prior authorization requirements have been met.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Lynparza 150 milligram tablets as maintenance therapy in an enrollee with endometrial cancer. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Medicare-approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug as prescribed, for treatment of the noted diagnosis. There was no peer-reviewed, clinically relevant, medical literature from an approved journal submitted to support this appeal. Therefore, the requested drug is not being prescribed for a medically accepted indication as defined by Medicare.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Alogliptin 25 milligram tablet to treat diabetes. The Part D plan denied the request. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The requested drug is not on the plans formulary. In order to grant an exception for a drug not on the plans formulary, alternative formulary drugs must have been tried, failed, or deemed contraindicated. In this case, the documentation does not support why the formulary alternatives, required by the plan would likely not be as effective for this diagnosis, and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a request for coverage of Novolog 100 unit per milliliter vial to treat type 1 diabetes mellitus. The Part D plan denied the request for coverage and then auto-forwarded the case to us for review. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted. The submitted documentation indicates that the requested drug is being administered with a home infusion pump. Medicare classifies insulin infusion pumps for home use as durable medical equipment. Medicare rules state that Medicare Part B pays for the rental and purchase of durable medical equipment. Additionally, payment will be made under Medicare Part B for supplies necessary for the effective use of durable medical equipment, including drugs and biologicals. Coverage under Part D is excluded for any drug for which payment would be available under Part B. As such, the requested drug is not eligible for Medicare Part D coverage. This decision does not address the medical necessity of the drug. It only establishes that payment cannot be made under the Medicare Part D benefit. It has been noted by the plan that the requested drug has already been approved for coverage under the enrollees Medicare Part B benefits. Please submit the request for coverage through Medicare Part B.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Lyrica 200 milligram capsule to treat diabetic neuropathy. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The requested drug is not on the plans formulary. In order to grant an exception for a drug not on the plans formulary, alternative formulary drugs must have been tried, failed, or deemed contraindicated. In this case, the documentation does not support why the formulary alternatives, required by the plan would likely not be as effective for this diagnosis, and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Cyanocobalamin 1000 microgram per milliliter injection solution to treat pernicious anemia. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Drugs prescribed for use as vitamins and minerals are excluded from coverage under Medicare Part D. Therefore, the requested drug is excluded from coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a tiering exception request for Famotidine 20 milligram tablet to treat the enrollee's condition. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Famotidine 20 milligram tablet is a generic drug on Tier 2 of the plans formulary. There are no generic drugs of the same type on the lower tiers of the plans formulary to treat the same diagnosis. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.A physician reviewer determined that the tiering exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a tiering exception request for Levothyroxine Sodium 50 microgram tablet to treat the enrollee's condition. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Levothyroxine Sodium 50 microgram tablet is a generic drug on Tier 2 of the plans formulary. There are no generic drugs of the same type on the lower tiers of the plans formulary to treat the same diagnosis. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.A physician reviewer determined that the tiering exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Ozempic 8 milligrams per 3 milliliters subcutaneous solution to treat obesity in an enroll with prediabetes. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The use of the requested drug to treat the provided diagnosis is an off-label use. The Medicare approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, as prescribed, for the treatment of this diagnosis. Therefore, the requested drug(s) is not eligible for coverage under Medicare Part D.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Mycophenolate mofetil 500 milligram tablet prescribed for pulmonary fibrosis/idiopathic interstitial pneumonitis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The use of the requested drug to treat the provided diagnosis is an off-label use. The Medicare approved compendia do not contain any citations to support the use of the requested drug, as prescribed, for the treatment of this diagnosis. Therefore, the requested drug is not eligible for coverage under Medicare Part D. This decision does not speak to the medical necessity of this drug; it speaks to whether the Part D drug plan is responsible for payment under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rules.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a tiering exception request for Xifaxan 550 milligram tablet. The case was auto-forwarded by the plan.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Xifaxan 550 milligram tablet is a brand drug on Tier 5 of the plans formulary. This drug is being provided by the plan at the cost sharing level of the Specialty tier. Specialty tier drugs are not available for a tiering exception per Medicare rules. A physician reviewer determined that the tiering exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Cosentyx 150 milligram per milliliter pen injector to treat psoriatic arthritis. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The plan has prior authorization requirements for this drug. These requirements must be met before coverage can be extended. The submitted documentation does not satisfy the plans coverage criteria.A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a tiering exception request for Ajovy 225 milligram per 1.5 milliliter subcutaneous solution auto-injector for the prevention of migraine headache. The Part D plan denied the request. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Ajovy is a biologic on Tier 3 of the plans formulary. There are no biologics of the same type on the lower tiers of the plans formulary to treat the same diagnosis. Therefore, this biologic is not eligible for a tiering exception. A physician reviewer determined that the tiering exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Repatha Sureclick 140 milligram per milliliter auto-injector to treat mixed hyperlipidemia. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we reviewed all documentation submitted, including the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The requested drug is not on the plans formulary. In order to grant an exception for a drug not on the plans formulary, alternative formulary drugs must have been tried, failed, or deemed contraindicated. In this case, the documentation does not support why the formulary alternatives, required by the plan would likely not be as effective for this diagnosis, and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm. A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.