Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Liothyronine Sodium powder prescribed for hypothyroidism. The Part D plan denied your request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.We determined that the plan is not required to cover Liothyronine Sodium powder. Drugs compounded from bulk powders are not Food and Drug Administration approved and are therefore not covered under Part D. Your plan does not offer supplemental (additional) coverage for this drug. If you purchased drugs that are excluded, you must pay for them yourself. This decision does not address the medical necessity or appropriateness of the drug. It only establishes that payment cannot be made under the Medicare Part D benefit.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Zolpidem Tartrate 10 milligram tablet prescribed daily for insomnia. The Part D plan denied your request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.We asked your prescriber to send us information regarding your condition. We also asked for medical records or other documentation to show why you need this amount of the medication. We did not receive the documentation requested.Your medical records show your doctor prescribed Zolpidem Tartrate to treat your insomnia. Your plan has prior authorization requirements for this drug that must be met before they will cover the requested drug. The documentation provided does not show you have satisfied the plan's coverage criteria.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover Zolpidem Tartrate. The physician reviewer also determined that an exception to the plans prior authorization requirements cannot be granted at this time.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Mekinist 2 milligram tablets prescribed for cervical cancer. The Part D plan denied your request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The submitted documentation does not include medical records to support a prescribed diagnosis. As it cannot be determined that the drug was prescribed for a medically accepted indication, coverage cannot be allowed.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover the requested drug.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Modafinil 200 milligram tablet prescribed for narcolepsy. The Part D plan denied your request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. We asked your prescriber to send us information regarding your condition. We also asked for medical records or other documentation to show why you need this amount of the medication. We did not receive the documentation requested.The prescriber statement shows your doctor prescribed 800 milligrams of Modanafil daily to treat your narcolepsy. However, there are no medical records submitted to substantiate the prescriber statement submitted. A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover the Modafinil 200 milligram tablet, as the drug exceeds the number of doses that may be dispensed during a specific period of time.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Imvexxy 10-microgram Maintenance PAK to treat postmenopausal atrophic vaginitis. The case was auto-forwarded by the plan. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The prescriber has not provided patient specific clinical rationale, supported by medical records, as to why all alternatives required by the plan would likely not be as effective as the requested drug; and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm. Therefore, an exception to the plans formulary coverage criteria is not supported.Our physician reviewer's opinion is that formulary exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Oxycontin ER 15 milligram tablet prescribed every 12 hours for chronic pain and chronic pruritis. The Part D plan denied your request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. In order to grant an exception for a drug not on the plans formulary, alternative formulary drugs must have been tried, failed, or deemed contraindicated. In this case, the medical records do not support why other drugs on the plans formulary would not work for you. A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover Oxycontin ER 15 milligram tablet.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Nevanac 0.1% Droptainer to treat punctate keratitis, bilateral. The Part D plan denied the request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The prescriber has not indicated that all alternatives required by the plan have been tried and failed, or why the plans required step therapy drugs would likely not be as effective as the requested drug.  Our physician reviewer's opinion is that neither step therapy nor step therapy exception criteria are met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Dronabinol 2.5 milligram capsules prescribed as directed for radiculopathy, cervical region. The Part D plan denied your request. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The documentation shows your doctor prescribed Dronabinol to treat your radiculopathy, cervical region. However, the Medicare approved compendia do not support the use of this drug, as prescribed, for your condition. A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover Dronabinol.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Coenzyme Q10 powder prescribed for propionic acidemia. The Part D plan denied your request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. According to Medicare rules, drugs that fall into the category of over the counter drugs are excluded from coverage under Part D. Therefore, we determined that the plan is not required to cover the Coenzyme Q10. This decision does not address the medical necessity or appropriateness of the requested drug. It only establishes if payment can be made under the Medicare Part D benefit.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Phospha 250 Neutral 155-852-130 milligram tablets prescribed twice daily for prostate cancer. The Part D plan denied your request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.We determined that the plan is not required to cover Sildenafil because it is a vitamin or mineral product. Drugs prescribed for prescription vitamins and mineral products, except prenatal vitamins and fluoride preparations are excluded from coverage. Your plan does not offer supplemental (additional) coverage for this drug. If you purchased drugs that are excluded, you must pay for them yourself. This decision does not address the medical necessity or appropriateness of the drug. It only establishes that payment cannot be made under the Medicare Part D benefit.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a request for coverage of Repatha SureClick 140 milligram per milliliter subcutaneous injection pen prescribed for hypercholesterolemia. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Repatha SureClick is not included in the plans formulary. The prescriber has not provided patient specific clinical rationale, supported by medical records, as to why all formulary alternatives included in the plan to treat the noted condition would likely not be as effective as the requested drug and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm. Therefore, an exception to the plans coverage criteria is not supported. Our physician reviewer's opinion is that formulary exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Octreotide Acetate 100 micrograms per milliliter solution prescribed three times daily for hepatorenal syndrome. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The medical records show the doctor prescribed Octreotide Acetate to treat the enrollees hepatorenal syndrome. However, the Medicare approved compendia do not support the use of this drug for your condition. A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover Octreotide Acetate.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Farxiga 10 milligram tablet prescribed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure in an enrollee with reduced ejection fraction. The Part D plan denied your request for a tiering exception.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Farxiga 10 milligram tablet is a brand drug on Tier 4 of the plans formulary. There are no brand drugs of the same type on the lower cost sharing tiers. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to grant your request for a tiering exception.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Albuterol Sulfate 0.083% (2.5 milligram/3 milliliter) nebulizer solution prescribed for asthma. The Part D plan denied the request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The drug at issue is for use with a nebulizer in the enrollees home. This is eligible for coverage under Part B. The drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.We determined that the plan is not required to cover Albuterol Sulfate.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Tobramycin 300 milligram/5 milliliter nebulizer solution prescribed for atelectasis. The Part D plan denied the request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The documentation on hand indicates the enrollee is to use the drug at issue via a nebulizer in the home. This may be eligible for coverage under Part B. The item is not eligible for Part D coverage.We determined that the plan is not required to cover Tobramycin nebulizer solution.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a tiering exception request for Shingrix 50 microgram/0.5 milliliter injection prescribed for the enrollees condition. The Part D plan denied your request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Shingrix is a brand biologic on Tier 4 of the plans formulary. There are no brand biologics of the same type on the lower cost sharing tiers. Therefore, this biologic is not eligible for a tiering exception.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to grant your request for a tiering exception.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Sodium Benzoate powder prescribed for propionic acidemia. The Part D plan denied your request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.We determined that the plan is not required to cover Sodium Benzoate powder because it is an over-the-counter product. Nonprescription or over-the-counter drugs are excluded from coverage. Your plan does not offer supplemental (additional) coverage for this drug. If you purchased drugs that are excluded, you must pay for them yourself. This decision does not address the medical necessity or appropriateness of the drug. It only establishes that payment cannot be made under the Medicare Part D benefit.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a request for coverage of Cymbalta 20 milligram capsules prescribed for fibromyalgia. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Cymbalta is not included in the plans formulary. The prescriber has not provided patient specific clinical rationale, supported by medical records, as to why all formulary alternatives included in the plan to treat the noted condition would likely not be as effective as the requested drug and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm. Therefore, an exception to the plans coverage criteria is not supported. Our physician reviewer's opinion is that formulary exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a request for coverage of Motegrity 2 milligram tablets prescribed for chronic idiopathic constipation. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Motegrity is not included in the plans formulary. The prescriber has not sufficiently addressed why the alternative medications that are included in the plans formulary to treat the noted condition would likely not be as effective as the requested drug and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm. Therefore, an exception to the plans coverage criteria is not supported. Our physician reviewer's opinion is that formulary exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a tiering exception request for Pilocarpine 4% eye drops prescribed for open angle glaucoma. The Part D plan denied the request. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Pilocarpine is a generic drug on Tier 3 of the plans formulary. The prescriber has not sufficiently addressed all of the generic drugs of the same type on the lower tiers of the plans formulary to treat the noted condition. The prescriber has not explained why each lower tier alternative has been tried and failed or is contraindicated. A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover the Pilocarpine at a lower cost tier.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is a request for coverage of Lyrica 50 milligram capsules prescribed for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.Lyrica is not included in the plans formulary. The prescriber has not provided patient specific clinical rationale, supported by medical records, as to why the formulary alternatives included in the plan to treat the noted condition would likely not be as effective as the requested drug and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm. Therefore, an exception to the plans coverage criteria is not supported. Our physician reviewer's opinion is that formulary exception criteria are not met.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

You requested Promethazine Hydrochloride/Codeine Phospate 6.25-10 milligram syrup prescribed for relief of cough. The Part D plan denied your request. We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.We determined that the plan is not required to cover Promethazine Hydrochloride/Codeine Phospate because it was prescribed to treat a cough. Drugs prescribed for symptomatic relief of cough and colds are excluded from coverage. Your plan does not offer supplemental (additional) coverage for this drug. If you purchased drugs that are excluded, you must pay for them yourself. This decision does not address the medical necessity or appropriateness of the drug. It only establishes that payment cannot be made under the Medicare Part D benefit.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Opicapone 50 milligram tablet prescribed nightly for Parkinsons disease.   The Part D plan denied the request.  The requested drug is not on the plans formulary. We received a reconsideration request.We performed an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan, and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The prescriber has not provided patient specific clinical rationale, supported by medical records, as to why all formulary alternatives required by the plan would likely not be as effective as the requested drug for this condition, and/or would likely cause adverse reaction(s) or other harm. Therefore, an exception to the plans formulary coverage criteria is not medically necessary. A physician reviewed the appeal and determined that the requested drug is not eligible for Part D coverage.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Nucynta 50 milligram tablets prescribed twice daily for ten days for chronic knee pain. The Part D plan denied the request. We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. The documentation shows the doctor prescribed Nucynta 50 milligram tablets to treat the enrollees chronic knee pain. However, the Medicare approved compendia do not support the use of this drug for this condition. A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover Nucynta.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Spiriva 18 microgram HandiHaler prescribed as directed. The Part D plan denied your request for a tiering exception.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read your case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level. Spiriva is a brand drug on Tier 3 of the plans formulary. There are no brand drugs of the same type on the lower cost sharing tiers. Therefore, this drug is not eligible for a tiering exception.A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to grant your request for a tiering exception.
Appeal type: Prescription Drug
Decision: Unfavorable

At issue is Lidocaine 5% adhesive patch prescribed every 12 hours for thoracic intervertebral disc degeneration pain. The Part D plan denied the request.We received the case to perform an independent and de novo review. To make our decision, we read the case file carefully. We reviewed all documentation submitted. This includes the case file from the plan and any information submitted at the reconsideration level.The medical records show the doctor prescribed Lidocaine 5% adhesive patches to treat the enrollees thoracic intervertebral disc degeneration pain. However, the Medicare approved compendia do not support the use of this drug for this condition. A physician reviewed your appeal and determined that the plan is not required to cover Lidocaine 5% adhesive patch.