Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules say that medically necessary services are those that are reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or 
treatment of an illness or injury. Medically necessary services include services to improve the functioning of a 
malformed body member. You can find this rule in the Social Security Act, Section 1862(a)(1)(A). 
 
The rules say that services that are not medically necessary are not covered. The rules also say that 
experimental and investigational devices are not covered. You can find this rule at 42 CFR Sections 411.15 and 
411.15(o). 
 
The rules say that the accepted treatments for eliminating saphenous (great saphenous vein (GSV), anterior 
accessory GSV (AAGSV), small saphenous vein (SSV)) reflux (saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal) are 
radiofrequency ablation (RFA), laser ablation (EVLA), polidocanol microfoam (PEM), cyanoacrylate 
embolization (CAE) ablation, and mechanochemical ablation (MOCA). Coverage is only for devices with FDA 
approval or clearance consistent with saphenous ablation and used according to its approved instructions for 
use (IFU). 
 
RFA and EVLA are classified as thermal tumescent (TT) techniques; PEM, CAE and MOCA are non-thermal 
non-tumescent (NTNT) techniques. Each endovenous ablation approach has advantages and disadvantages; 
which one is best depends on the unique clinical/anatomical scenario. While saphenous vein ligation and 
stripping remains an important option in selected cases, it has been largely supplanted by endovenous ablation 
therapy as primary treatment of saphenous (axial/truncal) vein incompetence. The treatments to eliminate the 
saphenous vein reflux will be considered medically necessary if the patient remains symptomatic after a six-
week trial of conservative therapy and has reflux in a saphenous vein. You can find this rule in Local Coverage 
Determination (LCD) Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremity, Treatment of L33575. 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules state that tier 2 genetic tests are unlikely to impact therapeutic decision-making, directly impact 
treatment, outcome and/or clinical management in the care of the beneficiary and will be denied as not 
medically necessary. You can find this information in Local Coverage Determination (LCD): Molecular 
Pathology Procedures (L35000). 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules say that varicose veins are caused by venous insufficiency as a result of valve reflux (incompetence). 
The venous insufficiency results in dilated, tortuous, superficial vessels that protrude from the skin of the lower 
extremities. Spider veins (telangiectases) are dilated capillary veins that are most often treated for cosmetic 
purposes. The accepted treatments for eliminating saphenous (great saphenous vein (GSV), anterior accessory 
GSV (AAGSV), small saphenous vein (SSV)) reflux (saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal) are radiofrequency 
ablation (RFA), laser ablation (EVLA), polidocanol microfoam (PEM), cyanoacrylate embolization (CAE) 
ablation, and mechanochemical ablation (MOCA).  
 
RFA and EVLA are classified as thermal tumescent (TT) techniques; PEM, CAE and MOCA are non-thermal 
non-tumescent (NTNT) techniques. Each endovenous ablation approach has advantages and disadvantages; 
which one is best depends on the unique clinical/anatomical scenario. While saphenous vein ligation and 
stripping remains an important option in selected cases, it has been largely supplanted by endovenous ablation 
therapy as primary treatment of saphenous (axial/truncal) vein incompetence. The treatments to eliminate the 
saphenous vein reflux will be considered medically necessary if the patient remains symptomatic after a six-
week trial of conservative therapy and has reflux in a saphenous vein. 
 
The treatments for symptomatic varicose tributaries are either compressive sclerotherapy or microphlebectomy. 
The treatments of the tributary veins will be considered medically necessary if saphenous reflux is not present 
or already successfully eliminated, the veins are greater than 4 mm in diameter and if the patient remains 
symptomatic after a six-week trial of conservative therapy.   
The patient is considered symptomatic if any of the following signs and symptoms of significantly diseased 
vessels of the lower extremities are documented in the medical record: 
 stasis ulcer of the lower leg, 
 significant pain and significant edema that interferes with activities of daily living, 
 bleeding associated with the diseased vessels of the lower extremities, 
 recurrent episodes of superficial phlebitis, 
 stasis dermatitis, or 
 refractory dependent edema. 
 
You can find this rule in the Local Coverage Determination for Treatment of Varicose Veins of the Lower 
Extremity, L33575. 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules state that: 
 
1. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) will be considered medically reasonable and necessary when the following 
three (3) requirements are met: 
 History, physical examination, and concordant radiological image-based diagnostic testing supporting 
one of the following: 
1.  
 Lumbar, cervical or thoracic radiculopathy, radicular pain and/or neurogenic 
claudication due to disc herniation, osteophyte or osteophyte complexes, severe 
degenerative disc disease, producing foraminal or central spinal stenosis
5
; OR 
 Post-laminectomy syndrome; OR 
 Acute herpes zoster associated pain 
AND 
 Radiculopathy, radicular pain and/or neurogenic claudication is severe enough to greatly impact quality 
of life or function. An objective pain scale or functional assessment must be performed at baseline 
(prior to interventions). The same scale* must be repeated at each follow-up for assessment of response. 
AND 
 Pain duration of at least four (4) weeks, and the inability to tolerate noninvasive conservative care or 
medical documentation of failure to respond to four (4) weeks of noninvasive conservative 
care or acute herpes zoster refractory to conservative management where a four (4) week wait is not 
required. 
You can find this rule at the Medicare Local Coverage Determination (LCD)- L39036, Epidural Steroid 
Injections for Pain Management. 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules say that Medicare considers panniculectomy medically necessary when the panniculus hangs below 
the level of the pubis, and the medical records document that the panniculus causes chronic intertrigo 
(dermatitis occurring on opposed surfaces of the skin, skin irritation, infection or chafing) that consistently 
recurs over 3 months while receiving appropriate medical therapy or remains refractory to appropriate medical 
therapy over a period of 3 months. You can find this information in the Local Coverage Determination (LCD): 
Cosmetic and Reconstructive Surgery (L33428). 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
  
  
   
The rules state that readmission review involves admissions to an acute, general, short-term hospital occurring 
less than 31 calendar days from the date of discharge from the same or another acute, general, short-term 
hospital. Neither the day of discharge nor the day of admission is counted when determining whether a 
readmission has occurred. Obtain the appropriate medical records for the initial admission and readmission. 
Perform case review on both stays. Analyze the cases specifically to determine whether the patient was 
prematurely discharged from the first confinement, thus causing readmission. Perform an analysis of the stay at 
the first hospital to determine the cause(s) and extent of any problem(s) (e.g., incomplete or substandard 
treatment). Consider the information available to the attending physician who discharged the patient from the 
first confinement. Do not base a determination of a premature discharge on information that the physician or 
provider could not have known or events that could not have been anticipated at the time of discharge. Deny 
readmissions if the readmission was medically unnecessary, if the readmission resulted from a premature 
discharge from the same hospital or if the readmission was a result of circumvention of PPS by the same 
hospital. You can find this rule in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Internet Only Manual, 
Publication 100-10, Quality Improvement Organizations Manual, Chapter 4, Section 4240. 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules. acute 
inpatient services from December 6, 2022, forward
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules say that Medicare will not pay for dental services. Dental services are items and services involving 
the care, treatment, filling, removal or replacement of teeth or structures directly supporting the teeth. Medicare 
defines "structures directly supporting the teeth" as the periodontium, which includes the gingivae, 
dentogingival junction, periodontal membrane, cementum of the teeth, and alveolar process. You can find this 
rule in the Social Security Act, Section 1862(a)(12) and in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 
Internet Only Manual, Publication 100-02, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 15, Section 150. 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules. The contract 
says that the Plan covers certain dental services as a supplemental (extra) benefit. This benefit does not include 
a cone beam CT image capture. You can find this information on pages 75, and 162-167 of the Plans 2022 
Evidence of Coverage (EOC).
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
The rules say that a Group 3 PWC with no power options (K0848, K0849, K0850, K0851, K0852, K0853, 
K0854, K0855) is covered if: 
A. All of the coverage criteria (a)-(e) for a PWC are met; and 
B. The beneficiary's mobility limitation is due to a neurological condition, myopathy, or congenital 
skeletal deformity; and 
C. The beneficiary has had a specialty evaluation that was performed by a licensed/certified 
medical professional, such as a PT or OT, or practitioner who has specific training and 
experience in rehabilitation wheelchair evaluations and that documents the medical necessity for 
the wheelchair and its special features (see Documentation Requirements section). The PT, OT, 
or practitioner may have no financial relationship with the supplier; and 
D. The wheelchair is provided by a supplier that employs a RESNA-certified Assistive Technology 
Professional (ATP) who specializes in wheelchairs and who has direct, in-person involvement in 
the wheelchair selection for the beneficiary. 
If a Group 3 PWC is provided and if criteria (IV)(A)  (IV)(D) are not met, it will be denied as not reasonable 
and necessary. 
 
A Group 3 PWC with Single Power Option (K0856, K0857, K0858, K0859, K0860) or with Multiple Power 
Options (K0861, K0862, K0863, K0864) is covered if: 
E. The Group 3 criteria IV(A) and IV(B) are met; and 
F. The Group 2 Single Power Option (criteria II[A] and II[B]) or Multiple Power Options (criteria 
III[A] and III[B]) (respectively) are met. 
You can find this rule at Local Coverage Determination (LCD) L33789: Power Mobility Devices (eff. 1/1/20). 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules say that minimally invasive surgical (MIS) fusion of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) utilizing a lateral 
transfixation approach is considered medically necessary when ALL of the following criteria are met: 
 Have moderate to severe pain with functional impairment and pain that persists, despite a minimum 6 
months of intensive nonoperative treatment that must include medication optimization, activity 
modification, bracing, and active therapeutic exercise targeted at the lumbar spine, pelvis, SIJ and hip 
including a home exercise program 
 Patients report of typically unilateral pain that is caudal to the lumbar spine (L5 vertebrae), localized 
over the posterior SIJ, and consistent with SIJ pain 
 A thorough physical examination demonstrating localized tenderness with palpation over the sacral 
sulcus (Fortins point, i.e., at the insertion of the long dorsal ligament inferior to the posterior superior 
iliac spine (PSIS) in the absence of tenderness of similar severity elsewhere (e.g., greater trochanter, 
lumbar spine, coccyx) and that other obvious sources for their pain do not exist 
 Positive response to a cluster of 3 provocative tests (e.g., thigh thrust test, compression test, Gaenslens 
test, distraction test, Patricks sign, posterior provocation test) 
 Absence of generalized pain behavior (e.g., somatoform disorder) or generalized pain disorders (e.g., 
fibromyalgia) 
 Diagnostic imaging studies that include ALL of the following: 
o Imaging (plain radiographs and a computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging 
(MRI)) of the SIJ that excludes the presence of destructive lesions (e.g., tumor, infection), 
fracture, traumatic SIJ instability, or inflammatory arthropathy that would not be properly 
addressed by percutaneous SIJ fusion (SIJF) 
o Imaging of the pelvis (anteroposterior (AP) plain radiograph) to rule out concomitant hip 
pathology 
o Imaging of the lumbar spine (CT or MRI) to rule out neural compression or other degenerative 
condition that can be causing low back or buttock pain 
 At least 75% reduction of pain for the expected duration of 2 anesthetics (on separate visits, each with a 
different duration of action), and the ability to perform previously painful maneuvers, following an 
image-guided, contrast-enhanced intra-articular SIJ injection 
 A trial of at least 1 therapeutic intra-articular SIJ injection (i.e., corticosteroid injection) 
 
You can find this rule in the Local Coverage Determination for Minimally Invasive Surgical (MIS) Fusion of 
the Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ), L39025.  
 If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules say that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS) has established units of service edits 
referred to as Medically Unlikely Edits (MUEs). An MUE for a Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System 
(HCPCS)/Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code is the maximum number of units of service under most 
circumstances allowable by the same provider for the same enrollee on the same date of service. Claims 
submitted where the unit of service exceeds the MUE value for that HCPCS/CPT code will be denied.   
 
Beginning on April 1, 2013, CMS introduced the MUE Adjudication Indicator (MAI) to differentiate between 
types of MUEs. If a code has an MAI of 1, appropriate use of a modifier may be used to report the same code 
on separate lines of the claim. MUEs for codes with an MAI of 2 are absolute date of service edits. These are 
per day edits based on policy. Codes with an MAI of 2 have been rigorously reviewed and vetted within 
CMS and obtain this MAI designation because units of service on the same date of service (DOS) in excess of 
the MUE value would be considered impossible because it was contrary to statute, regulation, or subregulatory 
guidance. 
 
You can find this rule in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare National Correct Coding 
Initiative Policy Manual for Medicare Services, Chapter I(V). 
 
The rules say that MUEs for HCPCS codes with an MAI of 3 are date of service edits. These are per day 
edits based on clinical benchmarks. If claim denials based on these edits are appealed, MACs may pay UOS in 
excess of the MUE value if there is adequate documentation of medical necessity of correctly reported units. If 
MACs have pre-payment evidence (e.g. medical review) that UOS in excess of the MUE value were actually 
provided, were correctly coded, and were medically necessary, the MACs may bypass the MUE for a HCPCS 
code with an MAI of 3 during claim processing, reopening, or redetermination, or in response to effectuation 
instructions from a reconsideration or higher level appeal. You can find this rule in the Centers for Medicare 
and Medicaid Services, Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 23, Section 20.9.3.2. 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules say that providers/suppliers must report services correctly. Procedures should be reported with the 
Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code that describes the services performed. You can find this rule in 
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare National Correct Coding Initiative Policy Manual 
for Medicare Services, Chapter I(A). 
 
The rules say that the Physician Fee Schedule Status Indicator I means that this code is not valid for Medicare 
purposes. Medicare uses another code for reporting of, and payment for, these services. You can find this 
information in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Internet Only Manual, Publication 100-04, 
Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 23, 30.2.2. 
 
The rules say that a mastectomy sleeve (L8010) is denied as noncovered, since it does not meet the definition 
of a prosthesis. You can find this rule in Local Coverage Article: External Breast Prostheses - Policy Article 
(A52478). 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules say that providers/suppliers must report services correctly. Procedures should be reported with the 
Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code that describes the services performed. You can find this rule in 
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare National Correct Coding Initiative Policy Manual 
for Medicare Services, Chapter I(A). 
 
The rules say that, when reporting ground ambulance services, providers should report the most appropriate 
ICD-10 code that adequately describes the patients medical condition at the time of transport as the primary 
diagnosis. In addition, a secondary diagnosis, from ICD-10 Code Group 3 of the article, must be reported. 
Group 3 codes include Z74.01 (bed confinement status), Z74.3 (need for continuous supervision), Z78.1 
(physical restrain status) and Z99.89 (dependence on other enabling machines and devices). You can find this 
information in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Local Coverage Article: Billing and Coding: 
Ambulance Services (Ground Ambulance) (A54574). 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.
Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
  
  
   
The rules say that if medically necessary and reasonable, Medicare will cover one Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) 
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan to determine the initial level of cancer treatment needed for an 
enrollee. After the completion of the initial anti-cancer therapy, additional FDG PET scans may be covered at 
the discretion of Medicare. You can find this rule in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Internet 
Only Manual, Publication 100-03, National Coverage Determinations Manual, Section 220.6.17. 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.