Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

 
The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
 
The rules say Covered Indications:   
 
Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA or Kyphoplasty) procedures will 
be considered medically reasonable and necessary for the following indications: 
 
    1. Painful, debilitating, osteoporotic vertebral collapse/compression fractures, defined as those that have not 
responded to non-surgical medical management (e.g., narcotic and/or non- narcotic medication, physical 
therapy modalities) with and without methods of immobility (e.g., rest, bracing). 
        Both PVP and PVA will be considered reasonable and necessary when ALL of the following criteria are 
met: 
            Acute (less than 6 wks) or subacute (6-12 wks) osteoporotic VCF (T1 L5), based on symptom onset, 
and documented by advanced imaging demonstrating bone marrow edema on MRI or bone-scan/SPECT/CT 
uptake and 
            The beneficiary is symptomatic and is hospitalized with severe pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] or 
Visual Analog Scale [VAS] pain score greater than or equal to 8) or is non-hospitalized with moderate to 
severe pain (NRS or VAS greater than or equal to 5) despite optimal non-surgical management (NSM) with 
one of the following: 
                Worsening Pain or 
                Stable to improved pain (but NRS or VAS greater than or equal to 5) when 2 or more of the 
following are present: 
                    Progression of vertebral body height loss 
                    Greater than 25% vertebral body height reduction 
                    Kyphotic deformity 
                    Severe impact of VCF on daily functioning (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RDQ] 
Greater than 17) 
 
Continuum of care: All patients presenting with vertebral compression fractures (VCF) should be referred for 
evaluation of bone mineral density and osteoporosis education for subsequent treatment as indicated and 
instructed to take part in an osteoporosis prevention/treatment program.8  
    2. Malignant Vertebral Fractures 
 
Osteolytic vertebral metastasis or myeloma with severe back pain related to a destruction of the vertebral body, 
not involving the major part of the cortical bone. 
 
Limitations 
 
    1. Exclusion criteria: Absolute contraindication; Current back pain is not primarily due to the identified acute 
or subacute VCF(s); Osteomyelitis, discitis or active systemic infection; Pregnancy; Active surgical site 
infection 
 
        Relative contraindication: Greater than three vertebral fractures per procedure; Allergy to bone cement or 
opacification agents; Uncorrected coagulopathy; Spinal instability; Myelopathy from the fracture; Neurologic 
deficit; Neural impingement; Fracture retropulsion/canal compromise 
 
You can find this information in Medicare's Local Coverage Determination (LCD): Percutaneous Vertebral 
Augmentation (PVA) for Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) (L34976). 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com.