Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided on March 06, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for an office visit. You say that you are requesting a reconsideration of the denied 
charges. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided 
on March 06, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for lab testing provided on February 15, 2023, by an out-of-
network (OON) provider.  
 
 
 You asked the Plan to pay for lab testing. You say that you are requesting reconsideration. The Plan denied 
your request. The Plan says the enrollee must receive their care from a network provider (for more information 
about this, see Section 2 of Chapter 3). In most cases, care the enrollee receives from an out-of-network 
provider (a provider who is not part of the plans network) will not be covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The requested provider in this case is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan had network providers 
available who could have provided the items/services at issue in this appeal. The Plan did not pre-approve the 
item/service at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay for these items/services. 
Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for lab testing provided on February 15, 2023, by an 
out-of-network (OON) provider.
Appeal type: DME/ Orthotics
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve a continuous glucose monitor (CGM). 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve a CGM. You say that you would like the Plan to reconsider their denial. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee does not meet criteria for the requested CGM. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that therapeutic CGMs are considered medically 
reasonable and necessary when prescribed in accordance with their FDA indications for enrollees with diabetes 
who are insulin treated or who have a history of problematic hypoglycemia, and have had an in-person visit 
with their treating physician to evaluate their diabetes control and determine whether the criteria for coverage 
have been met. 
 
We looked at the file and Medicare rules. The documentation indicates that the enrollee does not use insulin or 
have a history of problematic hypoglycemia. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for 
coverage of a CGM have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve a 
continuous glucose monitor (CGM).
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided on November 21, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for an office visit. You say that the enrollee did not provide insurance and was seen 
due to continuity of healthcare. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network 
care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided 
on November 21, 2022.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for a specialist office visit provided on 
February 22, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the copayment for a specialist office visit. You say that you disagree with the 
copayment. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay a $45 
copayment for physician/practitioner services/specialist. 
 
You have been asked to pay a $45 copayment for a specialist office visit. This item/service falls within the 
physician/practitioner services/specialist benefit category. This means that you have been asked to pay the 
correct amount based on your contract with the Plan. This cost sharing is a contractual obligation you agreed to pay when you enrolled in the Plan. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment 
for a specialist office visit provided on February 22, 2023.
Appeal type: Imaging
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure codes 77066 and 76642 billed for date of service 
March 9, 2023.  
 You asked the Plan to pay for procedure codes 77066 and 76642. You say that you would like the Plan to 
reconsider their denial of payment. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the number of units billed 
exceeds the maximum allowed.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that claims submitted where the unit of service 
exceeds the MUE value cannot be paid when the MAI value is 2.  
 
In this case, the MUE for CPT codes 77066 and 76642 is 1. The MAI value for these codes is 2. You billed 2 
units of each of these codes, exceeding the MUE. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules 
for coverage of procedure codes 77066 and 76642 have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does 
not have to pay for procedure codes 77066 and 76642 billed for date of service March 9, 2023.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for the inpatient hospital stay provided on 
March 19, 2022, to March 22, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the copayment for the inpatient hospital stay. You say that the Plan did not pay 
because you were in a private room. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged 
correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay a $350 
copayment for inpatient hospital care. 
 
You have been asked to pay a $350 copayment for the inpatient hospital stay. This item/service falls within the 
inpatient hospital care benefit category. This means that you have been asked to pay the correct amount based on your contract with the Plan. This cost sharing is a contractual obligation you agreed to pay when you 
enrolled in the Plan. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for the inpatient 
hospital stay provided on March 19, 2022, to March 22, 2022.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided on April 15, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for an office visit. You say that the records attached support the services provided. 
The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided 
on April 15, 2022.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the chiropractic services provided on September 19, 2022, to 
October 17, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the chiropractic services. You say that you are requesting reconsideration of the 
denied claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the chiropractic services 
provided on September 19, 2022, to October 17, 2022.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for a specialist telehealth visit provided on 
March 07, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the copayment for a specialist telehealth visit. You say that you should not be 
charged for a 5 minute phone call. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged 
correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay a $35 
copayment for physician/practitioner services, including doctors office visits. 
 
You have been asked to pay a $35 copayment for a specialist telehealth visit. This item/service falls within the 
physician/practitioner services, including doctors office visits benefit category. This means that you have been asked to pay the correct amount based on your contract with the Plan. This cost sharing is a contractual 
obligation you agreed to pay when you enrolled in the Plan. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to waive the copayment for a specialist telehealth visit provided on March 07, 2023.
Appeal type: Outpatient Therapies
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a clinic visit provided on February 20, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for a clinic visit. You say that you are requesting reconsideration of the denied 
claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a clinic visit provided on 
February 20, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for lab testing provided on February 24, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for lab testing. You say that you believe the services are medically necessary. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for lab testing provided on 
February 24, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Favorable

 
We decided that the Plan has to pay for code 99291 for date of service August 24, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for code 99291. You say that you disagree with the Plan's denial. The Plan denied 
your request. The Plan says that all benefits under this Medicare plan were already paid to the servicing 
provider. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that Medicare health plans must make reasonable and 
diligent efforts to gather and forward to the IRE information regarding its decision to deny coverage or 
payment. 
 
The Plan has not made reasonable and diligent efforts to gather and forward to us information regarding their 
decision to deny your request. Review of the file shows that the Plan states that these services were denied due 
to all benefits under this Medicare plan were already paid to the servicing provider. However, the 
documentation does not show exactly what was paid or why code 99291 cannot be paid as billed. No 
explanation on why this code was denied was provided. No other denial rationale was provided. The Plan did 
not substantiate their denial. Therefore, we decided that the Plan has to pay for code 99291 for date of service 
August 24, 2022.  
 
If the Plan does not agree with our decision, they can ask us to open a case again. We only open a case again 
if we believe there was a mistake or if there is new information to review. The Plan has to show us the mistake 
and/or send us the new information. This does not happen often. If we decide to open the case again, we will 
send you a letter.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a new patient office visit provided on August 25, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for a new patient office visit. You say that this service should not require a prior 
authorization. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a new patient office visit 
provided on August 25, 2022.
Appeal type: ER
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for the emergency room services provided on 
March 29, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the copayment for the emergency room services. You say that you were told to go 
to the emergency room. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay a $110 
copayment for emergency care. 
 
You have been asked to pay a $110 copayment for the emergency room services. This item/service falls within the emergency care benefit category. This means that you have been asked to pay the correct amount based on 
your contract with the Plan. This cost sharing is a contractual obligation you agreed to pay when you enrolled 
in the Plan. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for the emergency room 
services provided on March 29, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for subsequent nursing facility care visits provided on December 
15, 2022, to December 29, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for subsequent nursing facility care visits. You say that the records attached support 
the services provided. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is 
not covered. 
 Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for subsequent nursing 
facility care visits provided on December 15, 2022, to December 29, 2022.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided on September 01, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for an office visit. You say that the records attached support the services provided. 
The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided 
on September 01, 2022.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the nursing facility care and the debridement procedure 
provided on January 17, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the nursing facility care and the debridement procedure. You say that you are 
requesting reconsideration of the denied claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, 
out-of-network care is not covered. 
 Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the nursing facility care 
and the debridement procedure provided on January 17, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for office visit provided on February 20, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the copayment for office visit. You say that you say that it doesnt make sense that 
you have to pay a $20 copayment. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged 
correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay a $20 
copayment for physician/practitioner services, including doctors office visits. 
 
You have been asked to pay a $20 copayment for office visit. This item/service falls within the 
physician/practitioner services, including doctors office visits benefit category. This means that you have been 
asked to pay the correct amount based on your contract with the Plan. This cost sharing is a contractual obligation you agreed to pay when you enrolled in the Plan. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to waive the copayment for office visit provided on February 20, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for lab services provided on January 05, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for lab services. You say that the referring physician sent the specimen to be 
evaluated. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for lab services provided on 
January 05, 2023.
Appeal type: Surgery
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the cost for an in-network skin graft surgery provided on 
November 21, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the cost for an in-network skin graft surgery. You say that this is an extreme 
amount of money for this procedure. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged 
correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information. Your 
contract with the Plan says that there is a $1000 deductible, and a $350 copayment which applies to outpatient 
hospital services.  
 
You have been asked to pay a $350 copayment and $472.91 towards your deductible ($350 copayment + 
$472.91 total amount = $822.91). 
 
The item or service you asked the Plan to waive the cost for falls within the outpatient hospital services benefit 
category.  The Plan has followed Medicare rules by clearly disclosing in the contract that there is a $1000 deductible, and 
a $350 copayment which applies to outpatient hospital services. This cost sharing is a contractual obligation 
that had not been met at the time an in-network skin graft surgery was received on November 21, 2022. 
Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to waive the cost for an in-network skin graft surgery 
provided on November 21, 2022.