Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: Outpatient Therapies
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code S9328 billed for date of service January 29, 
2023, to February 25, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for procedure code S9328. You say that you would like the Plan to reconsider their 
denial of payment. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the billed code is invalid for Medicare 
purposes.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly. 
Providers must report services with the appropriate procedure code. 
 We find that procedure code S9328 has a Status Indicator of I on the Physician Fee Schedule. This means that 
procedure code S9328 is not valid for Medicare purposes. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare 
rules for coverage of procedure code S9328 have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not 
have to pay for procedure code S9328 billed for date of service January 29, 2023, to February 25, 2023.
Appeal type: Outpatient Mental Health
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the psychotherapy services provided on February 15, 2023, 
by an out-of-network (OON) provider.  
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the psychotherapy services. You say that the provider was unaware that they 
were out-of-network. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says enrollees must receive their care from a 
network provider. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
 The requested provider in this case is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan had network providers 
available who could have provided the items/services at issue in this appeal. The Plan did not pre-approve the 
items/services at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay for these items/services. 
Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the psychotherapy services provided on February 
15, 2023, by an out-of-network (OON) provider.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that the services are medically necessary for 
the enrollee's complex medical needs. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee's medical needs 
are being met in the current setting.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found the enrollee appears to be improving slowly but still somewhat unstable and requires 
additional acute care hospital services that can safely be provided until the enrollee is more stable and 
appropriate for transfer. The enrollee does not require services at the LTACH that are not already available at 
the current facility.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for each anticoagulant management services 
provided on January 06, 2023, to March 24, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the copayment for each anticoagulant management services. You say that you 
have not had to pay for this service in the past. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing 
was charged correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay a $20 
copayment for in-network outpatient diagnostic tests and therapeutic services and supplies. 
 
You have been asked to pay a $20 copayment for each anticoagulant management services. This item/service falls within the in-network outpatient diagnostic tests and therapeutic services and supplies benefit category. 
This means that you have been asked to pay the correct amount based on your contract with the Plan. This cost 
sharing is a contractual obligation you agreed to pay when you enrolled in the Plan. However, since the 
allowed amount is less than the standard copayment, you only owe $11.39 for each service. The total amount 
you owe is 56.95 ($11.39 copayment x 5 services = $56.95). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to waive the copayment for each anticoagulant management services provided on January 06, 2023, to March 
24, 2023.
Appeal type: DME/ Orthotics
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the coinsurance for the prosthetics and supplies provided on 
October 28, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the coinsurance for the prosthetics and supplies. You say that you were quoted a 
different price originally. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay 20% 
coinsurance for prosthetic devices and related supplies. 
 
You have been asked to pay 20% coinsurance for the prosthetics and supplies. This item/service falls within the 
prosthetic devices and related supplies benefit category. This means that you have been asked to pay the correct 
amount based on your contract with the Plan. This cost sharing is a contractual obligation you agreed to pay when you enrolled in the Plan. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to waive the coinsurance for 
the prosthetics and supplies provided on October 28, 2022.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that the services are medically necessary for the enrollee 
to regain prior level of function. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says ongoing skilled care can be 
provided in an alternative setting.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the enrollee does not require treatment by multiple therapies. While the medical 
record supports a need for physical or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive 
rehabilitation services. Medically necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for home evaluation visit provided on February 07, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for home evaluation visit. You say that it is the responsibility of the facility to obtain 
authorization. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for home evaluation visit 
provided on February 07, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for subsequent nursing facility care provided on November 01, 
2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for subsequent nursing facility care. You say that the provider was not responsible 
for obtaining authorization. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care 
is not covered. 
 Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for subsequent nursing 
facility care provided on November 01, 2022.
Appeal type: Testing
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for a colonoscopy with removal of polyps 
provided on January 24, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the copayment for a colonoscopy with removal of polyps. You say that you had 
this procedure done before and did not have a copayment. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost 
sharing was charged correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay a $200 
copayment for in-network surgery performed in an outpatient hospital setting. 
 
You have been asked to pay a $200 copayment for a colonoscopy with removal of polyps. This item/service 
falls within the in-network surgery performed in an outpatient hospital setting benefit category. This means that you have been asked to pay the correct amount based on your contract with the Plan. This cost sharing is a 
contractual obligation you agreed to pay when you enrolled in the Plan. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to waive the copayment for a colonoscopy with removal of polyps provided on January 24, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the eye exam provided on January 18, 2023, by an OON 
provider.  
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the eye exam. You say that you are requesting reconsideration for the denied 
claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the services were not authorized. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. The Plan contract says the enrollees POS benefit only applies to 
covered routine dental services. 
 
The requested provider in this case is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan had network providers 
available who could have provided the items/services at issue in this appeal. The Plan did not pre-approve the 
item/service at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay for these items/services. 
Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the eye exam provided on January 18, 2023, by an 
OON provider.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to provide reimbursement for the chiropractic services provided on 
January 31, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to provide reimbursement for the chiropractic services. You say that this should be covered 
under the Plan. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay a $40 
copayment for out-of-network chiropractic services.  
 
Since the allowed amount for the service ($28.39) is less than the standard $40 copayment, the full amount has 
been applied to your cost share. This means the Plan does not have to provide any reimbursement for this 
claim. This item/service falls within the chiropractic services benefit category. This means that you have been asked to pay the correct amount based on your contract with the Plan. This cost sharing is a contractual 
obligation you agreed to pay when you enrolled in the Plan. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to provide reimbursement for the chiropractic services provided on January 31, 2023.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that the services are medically necessary for 
the enrollee's care. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee does not meet the criteria for 
admission to a LTACH.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found the enrollee appears to be improving and requires only short-term additional acute 
care hospital services that can safely be provided until the enrollee is more stable and appropriate for a lower 
level of care. The enrollee does not require services at the LTACH that are not already available at the current 
facility.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the office visit and the treatment of the humerus bone 
provided on January 06, 2023. 
 You asked the Plan to pay for the office visit and the treatment of the humerus bone. You say that you are 
requesting reconsideration of the denied claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, 
out-of-network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the office visit and the 
treatment of the humerus bone provided on January 06, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the chiropractic manipulative treatment (98941) rendered by 
the out-of-network (OON) provider on December 26, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for this service. You say that you are requesting a reconsideration of the Plan's 
denial for payment. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this service was rendered by an out-of-
network provider, without prior authorization.  
  
 
 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider in this case is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan had network providers available 
who could have provided the service at issue in this appeal. The Plan did not pre-approve the service at issue. 
We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay for this service. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pay for the chiropractic manipulative treatment (98941) rendered by the out-of-network 
(OON) provider on December 26, 2022.
Appeal type: DME/ Orthotics
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve power scooter lift for a vehicle 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve power scooter lift. You say that you would like reconsideration because the 
requested power scooter lift is medically necessary. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the requested 
power scooter lift is not a covered benefit. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that for equipment to be covered, it must primarily serve a 
medical purpose.   
 
The item at issue in this appeal does not serve a purpose that is primarily medical in nature. This item is 
available to the general public and would be helpful even to those who are not sick or injured. Therefore, we 
decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve power scooter lift for a vehicle
Appeal type: Supplemental Benefit
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a periodic oral evaluation (D0120) and a cleaning (D1110) 
provided by an out-of-network provider on March 7, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the dental services. You say that you were unable to verify everything about the 
provider and you have been going to the same dentist for years. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says 
the dental services were received from an out-of-network provider and are not covered by your supplemental 
benefits.  
 
Medicare generally does not cover dental services. However, the Plan offers a dental benefit that exceeds 
Medicare coverage. For that reason, the Plans coverage rules apply in this case. 
 
  The record shows you received the requested dental services from an out-of-network provider. Though the Plan 
offers a dental benefit in excess of Medicare coverage, the requested items or services are not covered under 
this benefit when received from an out-of-network provider. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pay for a periodic oral evaluation (D0120) and a cleaning (D1110) provided by an out-of-network provider 
on March 7, 2023.
Appeal type: SNF
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for nursing facility discharge day. provided on April 19, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for nursing facility discharge day.. You say that you are appealing the claim 
payment denial. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for nursing facility 
discharge day. provided on April 19, 2023.
Appeal type: Supplemental Benefit
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a dental consultation (D9310) provided on December 2, 
2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the dental services. You say that the services should be covered as you disagree 
with the denial. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the services denied correctly as they do not fall 
within your dental benefits. 
 
Medicare generally does not cover dental services. However, the Plan offers a dental benefit that exceeds 
Medicare coverage. For that reason, the Plans coverage rules apply in this case. 
 
 
  Though the Plan offers a dental benefit in excess of Medicare coverage, the requested items or services are not 
among those covered under this benefit. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a dental 
consultation (D9310) provided on December 2, 2022.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for post-stabilization care provided from December 23, 2022, to 
January 5, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the post-stabilization care. You say that the records provided support medical 
necessity. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the services were not authorized. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules, which say that emergency care is covered. Plans must provide or pay for 
necessary post-stabilization care. When post-stabilization care is obtained from a non-contract provider, 
approval is required.  
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pay for the post-stabilization care. Our reviewer says 
that the services are not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our physician reviewer 
found the records do not document that at the time of admission the patient was too unstable for transfer to an 
in-network hospital, she was too unstable to have an in-network provider involved in her care, or that she was 
too unstable to have utilization management involved in oversight of her care. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the post-stabilization care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the 
Plan does not have to pay for post-stabilization care provided from December 23, 2022, to January 5, 2023.