Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that the enrollee would benefit from this care. The Plan 
denied your request. The Plan says the enrollees medical condition does not require IRF services, and care can 
be provided in another setting.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the complexity of the enrollee's medical, rehabilitation, and nursing needs does not 
require IRF care with an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitative care. The enrollee's rehabilitation needs 
can be safely provided in an alternate setting.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code 86077 billed for date of service August 9, 
2023.  
 
You asked the Plan to pay for procedure code 86077. You say that you disagree with the Plan's denial. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says the number of units billed exceeds the maximum allowed.   
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that claims submitted where the unit of service 
exceeds the MUE value cannot be paid when the MAI value is 2.  
 
In this case, the MUE for CPT code 86077 is 1. The MAI value for this code is 2. You billed 2 units of this 
code, exceeding the MUE. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for coverage of 
procedure code 86077 have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for 
procedure code 86077 billed for date of service August 9, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for laboratory services (procedure code 85025) rendered on 
April 24, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the services. You say that this should be paid for. The Plan denied your request. 
The Plan says Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 85025 (1 units) remains not supported 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly. 
Providers must report services with the appropriate CPT code. 
 
In this case, the CPT Code Manual definition of code  is "Blood count; complete (CBC), automated (Hgb, Hct, 
RBC, WBC and platelet count) and automated differential WBC count." 
 
We asked our coder to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to determine if the 
Plan was correct in denying the request to pay for the services. Our reviewer says that the services at issue in 
this case were not supported by the medical records. Our reviewer found that the documentation provided does not provide evidence that the CBC and automated differential were performed. 
 
We looked at this coder's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not 
have to pay for laboratory services (procedure code 85025) rendered on April 24, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the laboratory panel (87801, 87481, 87150 and 87798) billed 
for date of service July 17, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the laboratory panel. You say that this test was medically necessary and is 
supported in the medical record. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this panel was not billed in 
accordance with Medicare guidelines. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that a test panel is a single test with multiple 
components and is characterized by a single unit of service (UOS =1). A panel cannot be unbundled and billed 
as individual components regardless of the fact that the test reports multiple individual pathogens and/or 
targets. We looked at the file and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for 
coverage of the laboratory panel have not been met. Specifically, the service at issue is a test panel which was 
unbundled and billed as individual components. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for 
the laboratory panel (87801, 87481, 87150 and 87798) billed for date of service July 17, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code 86077 billed for date of service July 31, 
2023.  
 
You asked the Plan to pay for procedure code 86077. You say that you disagree with the denial. The Plan 
denied your request. The Plan says the number of units billed exceeds the maximum allowed.   
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that claims submitted where the unit of service 
exceeds the MUE value cannot be paid when the MAI value is 2.  
 
In this case, the MUE for CPT code 86077 is 1. The MAI value for this code is 2. You billed 2 units of this 
code, exceeding the MUE. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for coverage of 
procedure code 86077 have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for 
procedure code 86077 billed for date of service July 31, 2023.
Appeal type: DME/ Orthotics
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for prosthetic supplies (L5673, L8420, L8440, L8470) provided 
on June 14, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for prosthetic supplies. You say that you have submitted a proof of delivery. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says the documentation requirements have not been met. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules state that DMEPOS is covered only when there is a valid 
physician order, proof of delivery and relevant medical records which support medical necessity.  
 
The record does not contain a valid proof of delivery for the supplies provided in this case. The proof of delivery did not include an itemized delivery ticket showing what items were delivered. The record shows that 
the Plan made several attempts to obtain the necessary documentation without success. Therefore, we decided 
that the Plan does not have to pay for prosthetic supplies (L5673, L8420, L8440, L8470) provided on June 14, 
2023.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that the enrollee would benefit from these services. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says appropriate care can be managed at a lower level of care.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the complexity of the enrollee's nursing, medical and rehabilitation needs does not 
require an acute hospital inpatient stay with an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation care. There are no 
complex nursing or rehabilitation needs. The enrollee does not require treatment by multiple therapies. While 
the medical record supports a need for physical and/or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for 
intensive rehabilitation services. Medically necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. There is 
not a reasonable expectation that the enrollee will be able to fully participate in and benefit from the intensive 
rehabilitation therapy program provided in an IRF.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that the enrollee presents with significant functional 
deficits and medical comorbidities that requires close monitoring and 24-hour nursing care. The Plan denied 
your request. The Plan says admission to an IRF is not medically necessary.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the enrollee's medical problems are stable and there are no complex nursing or 
rehabilitation needs. The enrollee does not require treatment by multiple therapies and an intensive 
rehabilitation therapy program. While the medical record supports a need for physical or occupational therapy, 
there is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation services. Medically necessary care can be provided in a 
different level of care.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: DME/ Orthotics
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the walking sticks purchased on March 23, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for these services. You say that your previous walking sticks broke and you needed a 
replacement as soon as possible. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the provider is not covered. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that Medicare pays for services only when they are 
furnished by a provider or supplier enrolled in the Medicare program. 
 
We looked at the file and Medicare rules. The file shows that the provider was not Medicare-certified for the 
dates of service at issue. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the walking sticks 
purchased on March 23, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code G0483 billed for April 18, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for these services. You say that you disagree with the denial. The Plan denied your 
request. The Plan says procedure code G0483 is not supported. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly. 
Providers must report services with the appropriate CPT code. 
 
In this case, the CPT Code Manual definition of code G0483 is definitive drug testing, 22 or more drug classes. 
 
We find that CPT code G0483 is not supported in the medical record. Specifically, the records show that only 9 
drug classes were screened. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for coverage of these 
services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code G0483 
billed for April 18, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve otolaryngology services from an out-of-network (OON) 
provider. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the OON otolaryngology services. You say that this is the only specialist in 
the area. You say that you are worried for the condition of your ears.  The Plan denied your request. The Plan 
says there are in-network options that are available. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans must make care accessible to enrollees. According to Medicare rules, care is 
considered accessible to an enrollee if contract providers are available within reasonable distance and travel 
time from the enrollees home. The Plan says that enrollees must use contract providers.   
The provider is a non-contract provider. We were able to confirm that the Plan has contract providers located 
within reasonable distance and travel time from your home who can provide the otolaryngology services. 
Under Medicare rules, this means that contract providers are accessible to you. Therefore, we decided that the 
Plan does not have to pre-approve otolaryngology services from an out-of-network (OON) provider.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure codes 99223 and 99356 rendered on December 17, 
2022. 
 You asked the Plan to pay for the services. You say that this should be paid for. The Plan denied your request. 
The Plan says the denied codes remain not supported. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly. 
Providers must report services with the appropriate CPT code. 
 
In this case, the CPT Code Manual definition of the denied codes is: 
 
CPT 99223: 
 
Initial hospital care, per day, for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires these 3 key 
components: A comprehensive history; A comprehensive examination; and Medical decision making of high 
complexity. Counseling and/or coordination of care with other physicians, other qualified health care 
professionals, or agencies are provided consistent with the nature of the problem(s) and the patient's and/or 
family's needs. Usually, the problem(s) requiring admission are of high severity. Typically, 70 minutes are 
spent at the bedside and on the patient's hospital floor or unit 
 
CPT 99356: 
 
Prolonged service in the inpatient or observation setting, requiring unit/floor time beyond the usual service; 
first hour (List separately in addition to code for inpatient or observation Evaluation and Management service) 
 
We asked our coder to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to determine if the 
Plan was correct in denying the request to pay for the services. Our reviewer says that the services at issue in 
this case were not supported by the medical records. Our reviewer found that in terms of CPT 99223, the 
documentation supports a comprehensive exam, but not a comprehensive history or medical decision making of 
high complexity or that 70 minutes were spent. The records do not support that prolonged services were 
performed; therefore, CPT 99356 was not supported. 
 
We looked at this coder's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not 
have to pay for procedure codes 99223 and 99356 rendered on December 17, 2022.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for evaluation and management services (procedure code 99233) 
performed on May 29, 2023, and May 30, 2023. 
 You asked the Plan to pay for the services. You say that this should be paid for. The Plan denied your request. 
The Plan says the denied code remains not supported. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly. 
Providers must report services with the appropriate CPT code. 
 
In this case, the CPT Code Manual definition of code 99233 is "Subsequent hospital inpatient or observation 
care, per day, for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires a medically appropriate history 
and/or examination and high level of medical decision making. When using total time on the date of the 
encounter for code selection, 50 minutes must be met or exceeded." 
 
We asked our coder to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to determine if the 
Plan was correct in denying the request to pay for the services. Our reviewer says that the services at issue in 
this case were not supported by the medical records. Our reviewer found that an enrollee with history of 
coronary artery disease presented with chest pain and was found to have a myocardial infarction. The 
documentation supports an appropriate exam, but not an appropriate history or medical decision making of 
high level or that 50 minutes were spent. 
 
We looked at this coder's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not 
have to pay for evaluation and management services (procedure code 99233) performed on May 29, 2023, and 
May 30, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for an office visit provided on July 31, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the copayment for an office visit. You say that you were told that this provider 
was a primary care provider. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged 
correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay a $40 
copayment for each in-network Medicare-covered specialist visit. 
 
You have been asked to pay a $40 copayment for an office visit. This item/service falls within the each in-
network Medicare-covered specialist visit benefit category. This means that you have been asked to pay the 
correct amount based on your contract with the Plan. This cost sharing is a contractual obligation you agreed to pay when you enrolled in the Plan. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment 
for an office visit provided on July 31, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for physician services provided on November 09, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for physician services. You say that you are requesting reconsideration for the 
denied claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for physician services 
provided on November 09, 2022.
Appeal type: Transportation
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for an in-network medical van provided on 
July 10, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the copayment for an in-network medical van. You say that this copayment 
amount is too high for a one way trip for physical therapy. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this 
cost sharing was charged correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay a $200 
copayment for ambulance services. 
 
You have been asked to pay a $200 copayment for an in-network medical van. This item/service falls within 
the ambulance services benefit category. This means that you have been asked to pay the correct amount based on your contract with the Plan. This cost sharing is a contractual obligation you agreed to pay when you 
enrolled in the Plan. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to waive the copayment for an in-
network medical van provided on July 10, 2023.
Appeal type: Imaging
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the neck and spine x-ray provided on April 26, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the neck and spine x-ray. You say that you are requesting reconsideration of the 
denied claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the neck and spine x-ray 
provided on April 26, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided on June 28, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for an office visit. You say that you are asking for the review of the documents 
provided. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided 
on June 28, 2023.