Appeal type: unknown
Decision: unknown

The rules say that plans must pay for a medical service or item if regular Medicare would pay for it in this case. 
You can find this rule at 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 422.101. 
The rules say thermal radiofrequency destruction of cervical, thoracic or lumbar paravertebral facet joint 
(median branch) nerves will be considered to be medically reasonable and necessary as follows: 
o Initial thermal RF ablation:  
&61607; After the patient has had at least two (2) medically reasonable and necessary diagnostic MBBs, 
with each one providing a minimum of 80% relief of primary (index) pain (with the duration of 
relief being consistent with the agent used) or at least 50% improvement in the ability to 
perform previously painful movements and ADLs;  
OR 
&61607; After the patient has had at least one (1) medically reasonable and necessary therapeutic 
injection that provided at least 50% pain relief for at least three (3) months. 
o Repeat thermal facet joint RF ablation at the same anatomic site is considered medically reasonable and 
necessary provided the patient had a minimum of 50% improvement in pain for at least six (6) months.  
Limitations 
 
The following are considered not reasonable and necessary and therefore will be denied: 
1. Facet joint interventions done without CT or fluoroscopic guidance are considered not reasonable and 
necessary. This includes facet joint interventions done without any guidance, performed under 
ultrasound guidance, or with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Please refer to LCD L35094 
Services That Are Not Reasonable and Necessary, for information on paravertebral facet injections with 
ultrasound guidance. 
2. Intraarticular and extraarticular facet joint prolotherapy are considered not reasonable and necessary. 
3. Non-thermal modalities for facet joint denervation including chemical, low-grade thermal energy (less 
than 80 degrees Celsius), pulsed, laser, and cryoablation are considered not reasonable and necessary. 
4. General anesthesia is considered not reasonable and necessary for facet joint interventions. Neither 
conscious sedation nor Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) is routinely necessary for intraarticular facet 
joint injections or medial branch blocks and are not routinely reimbursable. Individual consideration 
may be given on redetermination (appeal) for payment in rare unique circumstances if the medical 
necessity of sedation is unequivocal and clearly documented in the medical record. Please refer to LCD 
L35049 Monitored Anesthesia Care for additional information. Frequent reporting of these services 
together may trigger focused medical reviews. 
5. It is not expected that patients will routinely present with pain in both cervical/thoracic and lumbar 
spinal regions. Therefore, the routine performance of facet joint interventions (both diagnostic and 
therapeutic) to both spinal regions may trigger focused medical review. 
6. It is not routinely necessary for multiple blocks (e.g., epidural block, sympathetic block) to be provided 
to a patient on the same day as facet joint injections. Multiple blocks on the same day could lead to 
improper or lack of diagnosis. If performed, the medical necessity of each injection (at the same or at 
different level[s]) must be clearly documented in the medical record. For example, performance of both 
paravertebral facet joint injection(s) and a transforaminal epidural injection (EI) at the same spinal level 
at the same encounter would not be expected unless a synovial cyst is compressing the nerve root. In 
this situation, EI may provide relief for the radicular pain while the facet cyst rupture allows nerve root 
decompression. For additional information on epidural injections, please refer to LCD L36920 Epidural 
Injections for Pain Management. Frequent reporting of multiple blocks on the same day may trigger 
focused medical review. 
You can find this rule in the Local Coverage Determination (LCD): Facet Joint Interventions for Pain 
Management (L34892) effective November 21, 2019. 
 
If you want to read these Medicare rules, you can go to this website www.medicareappeal.com. 
 
The Plan contract says that the Plan covers items and services in accordance with Medicare rules.