Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: ER
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code 99285 billed for date of service November 
20, 2022.   
You asked the Plan to pay for procedure code 99285. You say that you disagree with the Plan's denial. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says the number of units billed exceeds the maximum allowed.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that submitted claims in which the unit of service 
exceeds the MUE value cannot be paid when the MAI value is 3, unless there is evidence justifying the excess 
units.  
 
In this case, the MUE for CPT code 99285 is 1. The MAI value for this code is 3. You billed 2 units of this 
code, exceeding the MUE. One unit was already processed/paid by the Plan. You did not provide all the 
required evidence showing that the excess units were actually provided, were correctly coded, and were 
medically necessary. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for coverage of procedure code 
99285 have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code 99285 
billed for date of service November 20, 2022.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that an IRF level of care will provide you with the 
services necessary for a full recovery. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that you do not meet the 
criteria for admission to an IRF.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found that you do not require treatment by multiple therapies. While the medical record 
supports a need for physical or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation 
services. Medically necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code 87481 billed for date of service December 
20, 2022. 
 You asked the Plan to pay for procedure code 87481. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says payment for 
code 87481 is bundled into payment for code 87801. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly. 
Providers must report services with the appropriate CPT code. In this case, we have confirmed that code 87481 
is a column II code to column I code 87801. This claim has not been billed with an appropriate modifier to 
bypass the edit. Based on the claim submitted, Medicare billing criteria have not been met. Therefore, we 
decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code 87481 billed for date of service December 20, 
2022.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure codes 84436 and 84479 billed for date of service 
November 10, 2022.  
 
You asked the Plan to pay for procedure codes 84436 and 84479. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says 
payment for codes 84436 and 84479 is bundled into payment for code 84439. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly. 
Providers must report services with the appropriate CPT code. In this case, we have confirmed that codes 84436 and 84479 are column II codes to column I code 84439 with a modifier indicator of 0. The column II 
code is therefore not payable. Based on the claim submitted, Medicare billing criteria have not been met. 
Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure codes 84436 and 84479 billed for date 
of service November 10, 2022.
Appeal type: DME/ Orthotics
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for  the infusion supplies not used with external infusion pump, 
per cassette or bag (list drugs separately) (A4223) and disposable drug delivery system (A4305) provided 
November 9, 2022, to November 30, 2022. 
 You asked the Plan to pay for  the infusion supplies. You say that you provided IV infusion therapy for the 
enrollee at home and the home IV infusion supplies was omitted from reimbursement. The Plan denied your 
request. The Plan says these services are not covered benefits. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that items and services that are not medically 
necessary are not covered.  
 
We looked at the file and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for 
coverage of the infusion supplies have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay 
for  the infusion supplies not used with external infusion pump, per cassette or bag (list drugs separately) 
(A4223) and disposable drug delivery system (A4305) provided November 9, 2022, to November 30, 2022.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that you need acute rehabilitation to get back home. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says you do not meet the Medicare criteria for admission to an IRF. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the complexity of your nursing, medical and rehabilitation needs does not require an 
acute hospital inpatient stay with an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation care. You do not require 
treatment by multiple therapies, including either physical therapy or occupational therapy, and an intensive 
rehabilitation therapy program. Our reviewer found that while the medical record supports a need for physical 
and/or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation services. Medically 
necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. Our physician reviewer also found that there is not a 
reasonable expectation that you will be able to fully participate in and benefit from the intensive rehabilitation 
therapy program provided in an IRF. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve LTACH services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that LTACH services are medically 
necessary. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that the admission to a LTACH is not medically 
necessary. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found that the enrollee appears to be improving and should only require short-term 
additional acute care services that can safely be provided at the current facility until more appropriate for a  
 lower level of care soon. The enrollee does not require services at the LTACH that are not already available at 
the current facility.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve LTACH services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that it is medically necessary. The Plan denied your 
request. The Plan says the enrollee does not meet the requirements for approval. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines.  
 
Our physician reviewer found the enrollee will not make significant functional progress in a reasonable period 
of time in an IRF, and the enrollee does not need specialized and intensive therapies consisting of at least 3 
hours of therapy per day at least 5 days per week with multidisciplinary approach in an IRF. The document 
does not support necessity for admission to an IRF. When medically stable, the enrollee's rehab needs can be 
provided in an alternate and low-intensity setting in an SNF. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that it is medically necessary. The Plan denied your 
request. The Plan says the enrollee does not meet the requirements for approval. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines.  
 
 
Our physician reviewer found the complexity of the enrollees nursing, medical and rehabilitation needs does 
not require an acute hospital inpatient stay with an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation care. The 
enrollee was admitted for surgical repair of a hip fracture after a fall. Medical problems are stable. There are no 
complex nursing or rehabilitation needs.  
 
The enrollee does not require treatment by multiple therapies, including either physical therapy or occupational 
therapy, and an intensive rehabilitation therapy program. While the medical record supports a need for physical 
and/or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation services. Medically 
necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. 
 
There is not a reasonable expectation that this enrollee will be able to fully participate in and benefit from the 
intensive rehabilitation therapy program provided in an IRF. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that the services are medically necessary for 
the enrollee's medical needs. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee is receiving the care they 
need in the hospital where they are now and there is no need to transfer to the LTACH at this time.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found the enrollee is receiving appropriate care at the present acute care hospital. The 
enrollee does not require services at the LTACH that are not available at the acute care hospital where they are 
currently receiving care. We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that it is medically necessary. The Plan denied your 
request. The Plan says the enrollee does not meet the requirements for approval. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines.  
 
Our physician reviewer found the enrollee does not need specialized and intensive therapies consisting of at 
least 3 hours of therapy per day at least 5 days per week with multidisciplinary approach in an IRF. Document 
does not support necessity for admission to an IRF. The complexity of the enrollee's nursing, rehab, and 
medical, needs (combined complexity) does not require an acute hospital inpatient rehab stay with an 
interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitative care. The enrollee's rehab needs can be safely provided in an 
alternate and low intensity setting such an SNF. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Surgery
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve an Intracept procedure. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve an Intracept procedure. You say that the requested procedure is medically 
necessary and supported by strong science. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the requested 
procedure is not medically necessary.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that items and services that are not medically 
necessary are not covered.  
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve an Intracept procedure. Our reviewer 
says that the requested Intracept procedure is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. 
Our physician reviewer found the provided documentation does not include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 
indicating only modic changes. The documentation does not indicate facet degenerative joint disease or 
foraminal stenosis. Therefore, the reviewer found that the requested procedure is not medically reasonable or necessary.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of an Intracept procedure have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve an Intracept procedure.
Appeal type: Drugs
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve Tecentriq, Carboplation and Etoposide. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve Tecentriq, Carboplation and Etoposide. You say that due to the progression 
of the enrollee's disease while on single agent Tecentriq you feel that adding Carboplation and Etoposide is 
medically necessary. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the services are not medically necessary.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that Medicare may pay for unlabeled uses for anti-cancer 
drugs if they are medically accepted as safe and effective or appropriate for the particular use.  
 
 
 
 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve Tecentriq, Carboplation and Etoposide. 
Our reviewer says that the services are not medically necessary. Our physician reviewer found the record 
indicates that the enrollee has had disease progression following Tecentriq monotherapy. The Food and Drug 
Administration has not stated that the requested drugs are indicated for the enrollee's condition. The Medicare 
approved cancer drug compendia does not contain a supportive citation for the use of the requested drugs in the 
enrollee's clinical situation.  No literature from Medicare approved cancer journals were submitted for review.  
The elements of the coverage criteria are not satisfied.  The requested services cannot be recommended. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of Tecentriq, Carboplation and Etoposide have not been met. Therefore, we 
decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve Tecentriq, Carboplation and Etoposide.
Appeal type: ER
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code 99291 billed for date of service June 7, 2022.  
 
You asked the Plan to pay for procedure code 99291. You say that this was medically necessary. The Plan 
denied your request. The Plan says the number of units billed exceeds the maximum allowed.  
 The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that claims submitted where the unit of service 
exceeds the MUE value cannot be paid when the MAI value is 2.  
 
In this case, the MUE for CPT code 99291 is 1. The MAI value for this code is 2. You billed 2 units of this 
code, one of which was previously paid, exceeding the MUE. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of procedure code 99291 have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pay for procedure code 99291 billed for date of service June 7, 2022.
Appeal type: Supplemental Benefit
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve special supplemental benefits for the chronically ill 
(SSBCI).  
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve SSBCI benefits. You say that the services are medically necessary. The Plan 
denied your request. The Plan says the criteria for eligibility have not been met.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that, to qualify for SSBCI, an enrollee must have a 
documented chronic condition that is life threatening or significantly limits the health or function of the 
enrollee, has a high risk of hospitalization or adverse health outcomes, and requires intensive care coordination.   
We looked at the file and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for 
coverage of SSBCI benefits have not been met. Specifically, we have confirmed that you do not have an 
eligible condition that meets all the required criteria. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pre-
approve special supplemental benefits for the chronically ill (SSBCI).
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the laboratory services related to end-stage renal disease 
(ESRD) provided on January 4, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the ESRD-related laboratory services. You say that at this time, there is no 
contractual agreement which indicates these tests should be included in the dialysis rate. The Plan denied your 
request. The Plan says Medicare does not separately pay for ESRD-related laboratory testing. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules state that routine ESRD laboratory services are not 
separately payable. Laboratories should bill the facility directly for laboratory services as they are considered 
part of the composite rate. No other payment for these services is allowed. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pay for the laboratory services related to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) provided on January 
4, 2023.
Appeal type: Home Health
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the home health services provided from July 1, 2022, to July 
30, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the home health services as billed. You say that the required NOA was 
submitted. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the claim has not been billed with the correct 
admission date. 
 The Plan follows Medicare rules. The rules say that for home health services that are continuing from 2021, a 
NOA must be submitted for the first period of care in 2022, using the first date of the period as the admission 
date. Subsequent claims must report this new date as the admission date in order for the claim to be matched to 
the correct NOA.  
 
We reviewed the file and the Medicare rules. We find that the admission date reported on the claim at issue 
does not match the date for the NOA which is filed for the first date in 2022 as required. Based on this 
information, we find that the Medicare rules for payment of the claim at issue have not been met. Therefore, we 
decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the home health services provided from July 1, 2022, to July 30, 
2022.