Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a device evaluation provided on February 08, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for a device evaluation. You say that you are requesting reconsideration of the 
denied claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a device evaluation 
provided on February 08, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the anticoagulant management provided on May 02, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the anticoagulant management. You say that you are requesting reconsideration 
for the denied claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the anticoagulant 
management provided on May 02, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for infusion therapy, and related services provided on March 09, 
2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for infusion therapy, and related services. You say that these services were 
medically necessary. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for infusion therapy, and 
related services provided on March 09, 2023.
Appeal type: Surgery
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve L5 kyphoplasty (22514). 
 You asked the Plan to pre-approve L5 kyphoplasty. You say that the services are necessary. The Plan denied 
your request. The Plan says medical necessity has not been established. Therefore, coverage criteria have not 
been met. 
 
The Plan follows Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that PVA (percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or 
kyphoplasty (PKP)) is covered when specific criteria are met. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve L5 kyphoplasty. Our reviewer says that 
the services are not medically necessary. Our physician reviewer found detailed documentation is not evident 
regarding worsening pain. There is no indication of a progression of the body height loss, greater than 25% 
vertebral body height loss, kyphotic deformity, or a severe impact on daily activities. Moreover, there is 
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) corroboration of retropulsion and other plausible causes of lower back 
pain. Therefore, you do not meet the coverage criteria detailed in the LCD. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of L5 kyphoplasty have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not 
have to pre-approve L5 kyphoplasty (22514).
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the office visit and the biopsy provided on December 23, 
2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the office visit and the biopsy. You say that you are requesting reconsideration of 
the denied claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the office visit and the 
biopsy provided on December 23, 2022.
Appeal type: Drugs
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve Wegovy. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the medication. You say that you disagree with the denial. The Plan denied 
your request. The Plan says the medication is not covered as a medical benefit under the Plan. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that Medicare Part B generally does not pay for self-
administered drugs. The self-administered drugs requested here are not among the types which are covered by 
Medicare Part B. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve Wegovy.   
Benefits for the medication may be available under Medicare Part D. Contact the Plan that administers Part D 
benefits for further information concerning any benefits and appeal rights.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the coinsurance for colorectal cancer screening provided on 
March 29, 2023, to April 14, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the coinsurance for colorectal cancer screening. You say that you disagree with 
the coinsurance. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information (such as 
copayments, deductibles and coinsurance). Your contract with the Plan clearly says that you must pay 50% 
coinsurance for colorectal cancer screening. 
 
You have been asked to pay 50% coinsurance for colorectal cancer screening. This item/service falls within the 
colorectal cancer screening benefit category. This means that you have been asked to pay the correct amount 
based on your contract with the Plan. This cost sharing is a contractual obligation you agreed to pay when you enrolled in the Plan. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to waive the coinsurance for colorectal 
cancer screening provided on March 29, 2023, to April 14, 2023.
Appeal type: Testing
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an esophagogastroduodenoscopy provided on April 24, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the esophagogastroduodenoscopy. You say that the service was medically 
necessary. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network 
providers only in cases involving emergencies, out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. The Plan says 
that the Plan has also determined that these services are not urgent or emergent, nor were they approved in 
advance. 
 
 Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The requested provider in this case is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan did not pre-approve the 
services at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay for these services. Therefore, we 
decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an esophagogastroduodenoscopy provided on April 24, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the laboratory services provided on March 30, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the laboratory services. You say that you are requesting reconsideration of the 
denied claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the laboratory services 
provided on March 30, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a home visit evaluation provided on March 17, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for a home visit evaluation. You say that you are requesting reconsideration of the 
denied claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a home visit evaluation 
provided on March 17, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) provided on March 22, 
2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for a fecal occult blood test (FOBT). You say that the enrollee did not have the 
option on what lab service to use. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-
network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a fecal occult blood test 
(FOBT) provided on March 22, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the laboratory services provided on February 03, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the laboratory services. You say that you are requesting reconsideration due to 
medical necessity. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the laboratory services 
provided on February 03, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the office visit provided on January 11, 2023, by an OON 
provider.  
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the office visit. You say that you are requesting reconsideration of the denied 
claim. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the service was not authorized. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. The requested provider in this case is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan had network providers 
available who could have provided the items/services at issue in this appeal. The Plan did not pre-approve the 
item/service at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay for these items/services. 
Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the office visit provided on January 11, 2023, by 
an OON provider.
Appeal type: Drugs
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve Supartz (J7321, 20610). 
 You asked the Plan to pre-approve Supartz. You say that the services are necessary. The Plan denied your 
request. The Plan says based on the documentation provided, coverage criteria has not been met. 
 
The Plan follows Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that viscosupplementation therapy for the knee via intra-
articular injections of hyaluronic preparations will be considered medically reasonable and necessary when 
certain conditions are met. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve Supartz. Our reviewer says that the 
services are not medically necessary. Our physician reviewer found this would be an off-label use of this 
medication and is not evidence-based therapy. The request is not medically reasonable and necessary. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of Supartz have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to 
pre-approve Supartz (J7321, 20610).
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided on February 08, 2023, to March 22, 
2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for an office visit. You say that the services were medically necessary. The Plan 
denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for an office visit provided 
on February 08, 2023, to March 22, 2023.
Appeal type: Drugs
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve Lidocaine-Prilocaine cream. 
 You asked the Plan to pre-approve the medication. You say that you disagree with the denial. The Plan denied 
your request. The Plan says the medication is not covered as a medical benefit under the Plan. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that Medicare Part B generally does not pay for self-
administered drugs. The self-administered drugs requested here are not among the types which are covered by 
Medicare Part B. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve Lidocaine-Prilocaine cream.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the cost share. for an out-of-network office visit provided on 
February 22, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to waive the cost share. for an out-of-network office visit. You say that you disagree with 
the cost share. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information. Your 
contract with the Plan says that there is a $1000 deductible which applies to out-of-network 
physician/practitioner services. You are being asked to pay $286.49 towards your $1,000 deductible. 
 
The item or service you asked the Plan to waive the cost share for falls within the out-of-network 
physician/practitioner services benefit category. The Plan has followed Medicare rules by clearly disclosing in 
the contract that there is a $1000 deductible which applies to out-of-network physician/practitioner services. 
This cost sharing is a contractual obligation that had not been met at the time an out-of-network office visit was 
received on February 22, 2023. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to waive the cost share. for 
an out-of-network office visit provided on February 22, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the outpatient therapy services provided on December 16, 
2022, to January 30, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the outpatient therapy services. You say that you are requesting reconsideration 
due to medical necessity. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is 
not covered. 
 Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the outpatient therapy 
services provided on December 16, 2022, to January 30, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a home visit for the evaluation and management provided on 
March 28, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for a home visit for the evaluation and management. You say that the services were 
medically necessary. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for a home visit for the 
evaluation and management provided on March 28, 2023.
Appeal type: Outpatient Mental Health
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for psychiatric diagnostic evaluation with medical services 
provided on March 16, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for psychiatric diagnostic evaluation with medical services. You say that the services 
should be covered. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for psychiatric diagnostic 
evaluation with medical services provided on March 16, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the laboratory services provided on April 19, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the laboratory services. You say that you have submitted medical documentation 
with your appeal. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not 
covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the laboratory services 
provided on April 19, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for laboratory testing provided on November 04, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for laboratory testing. You say that this was medically necessary and should be 
covered. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for laboratory testing 
provided on November 04, 2022.