Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the services (G0402) provided on May 10, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the services. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the billed code is not 
supported. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly. 
Providers must report services with the appropriate CPT code. 
 
In this case, the CPT Code Manual definition of code G0402 is "Initial preventive physical examination; face-
to-face visit, services limited to new beneficiary during the first 12 months of Medicare enrollment". 
 
We find that CPT code G0402 is not supported in the medical record. Specifically, the records do not show that 
the services were provided during the first 12 months of Medicare enrollment for the enrollee in this case. 
Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for coverage of the services have not been met. 
Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the services (G0402) provided on May 10, 2023.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the outpatient office visit (991213) provided on July 12, 
2023, by an out-of-network (OON) provider.  
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the office visit. You say that kindly find the attached claim form with supportive 
documents and process towards payment. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says enrollees must receive 
their medical services from an in-network provider with the exception being urgent or emergent services. Non-
emergent services with non-contracted providers require prior authorization before services being rendered. 
 Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care. 
 
The requested provider in this case is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan had network providers 
available who could have provided the items/services at issue in this appeal. The Plan did not pre-approve the 
item/service at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay for these items/services. 
Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the outpatient office visit (991213) provided on 
July 12, 2023, by an out-of-network (OON) provider.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to waive the deductible for the inpatient hospital stay on June 28, 2023, 
to June 29, 2023.  
 
You asked the Plan to waive the deductible for the inpatient hospital stay. You say that you want to appeal the 
amount being charged. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this cost sharing was charged correctly. 
 
The rules say a plan must disclose to its enrollees in clear, accurate terms all cost sharing information. Your 
contract with the Plan says that there is a $950 deductible which applies to inpatient hospital care.  
 
The item or service you asked the Plan to waive the deductible for falls within the inpatient hospital care 
benefit category. The Plan has followed Medicare rules by clearly disclosing in the contract that there is a $950 
deductible which applies to inpatient hospital care. This cost sharing is a contractual obligation that had not 
been met at the time the inpatient hospital stay was received on June 28, 2023, to June 29, 2023. Therefore, we 
decided that the Plan does not have to waive the deductible for the inpatient hospital stay on June 28, 2023, to 
June 29, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the laboratory services provided on July 27, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the laboratory services. You say that this testing was medically necessary. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says that unauthorized, out-of-network care is not covered. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pay for care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving emergencies, 
out of area urgent care and pre-approved care.  
The provider of the item(s)/service(s) at issue in this appeal is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan 
did not pre-approve the item(s)/service(s) at issue. We found no exception that would require the Plan to pay 
for the item(s)/service(s). Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the laboratory services 
provided on July 27, 2023.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for lab services provided on July 24, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the lab services. You say that you disagree with the Plan's denial. The Plan 
denied your request. The Plan says you billed with an incorrect place of service on the claim. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that, for lab services, the POS code must reflect the 
location in which the sample was taken. POS code 81 is used to describe samples taken by the laboratory 
directly. We looked at the file and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for 
coverage of the lab services have not been met. Specifically, this claim was billed with the laboratory POS 
code. The records do not support that the sample was taken in a laboratory setting. Therefore, we decided that 
the Plan does not have to pay for lab services provided on July 24, 2023.
Appeal type: Testing
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the needle electromyography of 2 extremities, cranial nerve 
supplied muscles, short-latency somatosensory evoked potential study, continuous intraoperative 
neurophysiology monitoring, sterile needle and electrodes billed with codes 95938, 95861, 95868, 95927, 
95940, A4215 and A4556 provided on November 8, 2022. You asked the Plan to pay for the tests. You say that the services were billed correctly and should be paid. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says codes 95938, 95861, 95868, 95927, 95940, A4215 and A4556 are 
included in the facility payment and are not separately payable, as codes 95938, 95861, 95868, 95927 were 
reported with modifier TC, which is paid by the facility. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly. 
Providers must report services with the appropriate CPT code. 
 
The records indicate that this service was provided to the enrollee while in an inpatient or outpatient facility. 
Per the Physician Fee Schedule, there is a Professional/Technical indicator of 1 for CPT code 95938, 95861, 
95868, 95927. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for coverage of the tests have not 
been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the needle electromyography of 2 
extremities, cranial nerve supplied muscles, short-latency somatosensory evoked potential study, continuous 
intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring, sterile needle and electrodes billed with codes 95938, 95861, 
95868, 95927, 95940, A4215 and A4556 provided on November 8, 2022.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that an IRF with an intensive therapy program is the best 
setting for the enrollee. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the documentation does not support that 
the enrollee's needs could not be met at lower level of care such as a skilled nursing facility (SNF).  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the complexity of the enrollee's nursing, medical and rehabilitation needs does not 
require an acute hospital inpatient stay with an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation care. The enrollee's 
medical problems are stable and there are no complex nursing or rehabilitation needs. The enrollee does not 
require treatment by multiple therapies, including either physical therapy or occupational therapy, and an 
intensive rehabilitation therapy program. While the medical record supports a need for physical and/or 
occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation services. Medically necessary 
care can be provided in a different level of care. There is not a reasonable expectation that the enrollee will be 
able to fully participate in and benefit from the intensive rehabilitation therapy program provided in an IRF.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that the enrollee meets the full criteria for an IRF 
admission, and needs intensive therapy services to maximize their function and independence. The Plan denied 
your request. The Plan says an IRF admission is not medically necessary, but skilled therapies as an outpatient, 
at a skilled nursing facility (SNF), or at home with home healthcare may be approved upon request.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section.  
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the complexity of the enrollee's nursing, medical and rehabilitation needs does not 
require an acute hospital inpatient stay with an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation care. The enrollee's 
medical problems are stable and there are no complex nursing or rehabilitation needs. The enrollee does not 
require treatment by multiple therapies, including either physical therapy or occupational therapy, and an 
intensive rehabilitation therapy program. While the medical record supports a need for physical and/or 
occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation services. Medically necessary 
care can be provided in a different level of care. There is not a reasonable expectation that the enrollee will be 
able to fully participate in and benefit from the intensive rehabilitation therapy program provided in an IRF.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that inpatient rehabilitation treatment is necessary to help 
the enrollee return to daily activities and regain independence. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the 
enrollee's condition does not meet all the requirements for inpatient rehabilitation admission. The Plan says 
services may be provided at a lower level of care.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section.  
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the complexity of the enrollee's nursing, medical and rehabilitation needs does not 
require an acute hospital inpatient stay with an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation care. The medical 
records support a need for physical and/or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive 
rehabilitation services. Medically necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. It is not a 
reasonable expectation that the enrollee will be able to fully participate in and benefit from the intensive 
rehabilitation therapy program provided in an IRF.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code 00400-QX-P3 provided on August 1, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for procedure code 00400-QX-P3. You say that you would like the Plan to 
reconsider their denial of payment. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the services are not covered as 
billed. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that if more than one general anesthesia code is 
submitted on the same date of service by the same provider without a modifier to distinguish it as a separate 
surgical session or encounter, it will be denied. 
 
We looked at the file and Medicare rules. The same provider billed code 01270-QX-P3 for the same date of 
service, which was already paid. Procedure code 00400 was not billed with an appropriate modifier to 
distinguish it as a separate surgical session or encounter. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare 
rules for coverage of the anesthesia services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not 
have to pay for procedure code 00400-QX-P3 provided on August 1, 2023.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that you have medical conditions that require the level of 
monitoring that is provided at an IRF. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says an IRF admission is not 
medically necessary, but skilled therapies at a skilled nursing facility (SNF) may be approved upon request.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the complexity of your nursing, medical and rehabilitation needs does not require an 
acute hospital inpatient stay with an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation care. Your medical problems 
are stable and there are no complex nursing or rehabilitation needs. You do not require treatment by multiple 
therapies, including either physical therapy or occupational therapy, and an intensive rehabilitation therapy 
program. While the medical record supports a need for physical and/or occupational therapy, there is no 
documented need for intensive rehabilitation services. Medically necessary care can be provided in a different 
level of care. There is not a reasonable expectation that you will be able to fully participate in and benefit from 
the intensive rehabilitation therapy program provided in an IRF.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that admission is medically necessary for the 
enrollee. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee's care can continue to be provided in the 
current inpatient hospital. The Plan says the enrollee may be ready to move to another setting in the future. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found the enrollee does not require services at the LTACH that are not available at the acute 
care hospital. There are no services available at the LTACH that the enrollee requires that are not available at 
the health care setting being offered by the health plan. Given there are offered alternatives, LTACH is not medically necessary. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that the enrollee exceeds the criteria for long 
term acute hospital admission. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee is receiving 
appropriate inpatient acute care and is currently unstable for transfer to an LTACH. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found the enrollee does not require services at the LTACH that are not available at the acute 
care hospital. There are no services available at the LTACH that the enrollee requires that are not available at 
the health care setting being offered by the health plan. Given there are offered alternatives, LTACH is not medically necessary. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that the enrollee is weak and requires physical therapy to 
regain baseline that would allow them to function within normal daily activities. The Plan denied your request. 
The Plan says an IRF admission is not medically necessary, but Skilled therapies as an outpatient or at a skilled 
nursing facility (SNF) may be approved upon request.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section.  
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the complexity of the enrollee's nursing, medical and rehabilitation needs does not 
require an acute hospital inpatient stay with an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation care. The enrollee's 
medical problems are stable and there are no complex nursing or rehabilitation needs. The enrollee does not 
require treatment by multiple therapies, including either physical therapy or occupational therapy, and an 
intensive rehabilitation therapy program. While the medical record supports a need for physical and/or 
occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation services. Medically necessary 
care can be provided in a different level of care. There is not a reasonable expectation that the enrollee will be 
able to fully participate in and benefit from the intensive rehabilitation therapy program provided in an IRF.  
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.