Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that the enrollee needs to go to acute rehab because they 
live alone and need to rebuild their strength to get back to normal. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says 
the enrollee does not meet the criteria for admission to an IRF.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the enrollee does not require treatment by multiple therapies. While the medical 
record supports a need for physical or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive 
rehabilitation services. Medically necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Drugs
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve Farxiga. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve Farxiga. You say that Farxiga is medically necessary. The Plan denied your 
request. The Plan says the medication is not covered as a medical benefit under the Plan. 
 The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that Medicare Part B generally does not pay for self-
administered drugs. The self-administered drugs requested here are not among the types which are covered by 
Medicare Part B. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve Farxiga.
Appeal type: Surgery
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve L3, L4, and L5 kyphoplasty (22514, 22515 x2). 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve L3, L4, and L5 kyphoplasty. You say that this is medically necessary. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee does not meet inclusion criteria. 
 
The Plan follows Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that kyphoplasty can be covered when specific criteria are 
met. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve L3, L4, and L5 kyphoplasty. Our 
reviewer says that the enrollee does not meet coverage criteria. Our physician reviewer found there is no trial of 
fracture bracing. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of L3, L4, and L5 kyphoplasty have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the 
Plan does not have to pre-approve L3, L4, and L5 kyphoplasty (22514, 22515 x2).
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that the services are medically necessary for 
the enrollee to receive the care needed.  The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee is receiving 
the appropriate inpatient care and is currently unstable for transfer to an LTACH.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found the enrollee is receiving appropriate care in the current acute care setting provided by 
Health Plan. Documentation does not support that LTACH transfer is medically appropriate at this time. 
 We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that the enrollee needs stroke management 
and recovery rehab, oxygen weaning, nebulizer treatments every four hours, nutrition management and wound 
care. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee does not meet the criteria for admission to an 
LTACH.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
 
 
 
 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found the record indicates that the enrollee has ongoing acute medical issues and still 
requires acute care services. The enrollee continues to receive acute care services, and these have not been 
denied. The medical record does not indicate that the enrollee requires services that they are not currently 
receiving but that would be available at the LTACH facility. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that you had a fall and broke your hip and shoulder. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says you do not meet the criteria for admission to an IRF.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found you do not require treatment by multiple therapies. While the medical record 
supports a need for physical or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation 
services. Medically necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: DME/ Orthotics
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve a Baha 6 Max sound processor, auditory osseointegrated 
device (L8691). 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve a hearing aid. You say that your current hearing aid does not work properly, 
and the battery is dying. You also say your provider referred you to an audiologist and the hearing aid should 
have been ordered. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the documentation requirements have not been 
met. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules state that DMEPOS is covered only when there is a valid 
physician order, proof of delivery and relevant medical records which support medical necessity.  
 
 
 The record does not contain a valid physician order, or relevant medical records which support medical 
necessity for the supplies provided in this case. The record shows that the Plan made several attempts to obtain 
the necessary documentation without success. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve 
a Baha 6 Max sound processor, auditory osseointegrated device (L8691).
Appeal type: SNF
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve continued skilled nursing facility (SNF) care after July 
31, 2023. 
 You asked the Plan to pre-approve SNF care after July 31, 2023. You say that the continued admission to a 
SNF is medically necessary. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the continued admission to a SNF is 
not medically necessary. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that Medicare pays for care in a SNF when the four factors 
listed in the Medicare rules section are met. Custodial care is not covered. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve SNF care after July 31, 2023. Our 
reviewer says that the requested SNF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on 
Medicare guidelines. Our physician reviewer found you do not have daily skilled nursing needs that require the 
specialized skill, knowledge, and judgment of a skilled professional nurse. You do not have daily skilled 
therapy needs that require the specialized skill, knowledge, and judgment of a skilled professional therapist. 
You do not require daily skilled nursing and/or skilled therapy on an inpatient basis in a skilled nursing facility 
(SNF) setting. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of SNF care after July 31, 2023, have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the 
Plan does not have to pre-approve continued skilled nursing facility (SNF) care after July 31, 2023.
Appeal type: Surgery
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve laparoscopy, surgical, gastric restrictive procedure; with 
gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy (73644). 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve laparoscopy, surgical, gastric restrictive procedure; with gastric bypass and 
Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy. You say that this is medically necessary. The Plan denied your request. The 
Plan says records do not show that the enrollee has a BMI greater or equal to 35 
   
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that Medicare will cover bariatric surgery for enrollees 
who have:  
 
(1) a body mass index (BMI) of greater than or equal to 35;  
 
(2) at least one co-morbidity related to obesity; and 
 
(3) been unsuccessful with medical treatment for obesity.   
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve laparoscopy, surgical, gastric restrictive 
procedure; with gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy. Our reviewer says that the enrollee does not 
meet criteria for coverage. Our physician reviewer found the record indicates that the enrollee has a body mass 
index of 34. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of laparoscopy, surgical, gastric restrictive procedure; with gastric bypass and 
Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pre-
approve laparoscopy, surgical, gastric restrictive procedure; with gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y 
gastroenterostomy (73644).
Appeal type: Imaging
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve a positron emission tomography (PET) scan.  
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the PET scan. You say that the services are medically necessary.  The Plan 
denied your request. The Plan says the criteria for coverage have not been met. 
 
The Plan follows Medicare rules. Medicare rules state that a PET scan for dementia and neurodegenerative 
diseases are only covered under certain conditions. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the PET scan. Our reviewer says that 
the service is not medically necessary. Our physician reviewer found you have severe chronic obstructive 
pulmonary disease (COPD) and an enlarging lung nodule that is suspicious for lung cancer. According to the 
records, the intended study is body FDG-PET scan from the skull base to the mid-thigh. The records do not 
indicate any brain abnormalities that would warrant brain imaging.  The denial is upheld. 
 
 We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the PET scan have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not 
have to pre-approve a positron emission tomography (PET) scan.
Appeal type: Transportation
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the wheelchair van transportation (A0130) and case worker 
or social worker per mile (A0160) provided on February 11, 2023. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the wheelchair van transportation and case worker or social worker per mile. 
You say that you are requesting the claim reprocess with the enrollee being responsible for the full charges, in 
order to bill secondary insurance. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this request is not medically 
necessary because wheelchair vans do not meet the vehicle or crew requirements to be covered as ambulance 
transport.  
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that Medicare does not pay for wheelchair van transport 
services.  
 
The services you have asked the Plan to pay for are wheelchair van transport services. Therefore, we decided 
that the Plan does not have to pay for the wheelchair van transportation (A0130) and case worker or social 
worker per mile (A0160) provided on February 11, 2023.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute IRF admission and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that this is medically necessary. The Plan denied your 
request. The Plan says the services you need can be provided safely in other settings, for example, a skilled 
nursing facility, home with home health services or home with outpatient therapy. Under Medicare, the request 
is not medically necessary. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found your medical problems are stable and there are no complex nursing or rehabilitation 
needs. There is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation services and medically necessary care can be 
provided in a different level of care. 
 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute IRF admission and services.
Appeal type: DME/ Orthotics
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve exercise equipment (A9300). 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the exercise equipment. You say that this equipment is medically necessary. 
The Plan denied your request. The Plan says exercise equipment is not a covered benefit. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that for equipment to be covered, it must primarily serve a 
medical purpose.   
 
The item at issue in this appeal does not serve a purpose that is primarily medical in nature. This item is 
available to the general public and would be helpful even to those who are not sick or injured. Therefore, we 
decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve exercise equipment (A9300).
Appeal type: DME/ Orthotics
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve a continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) machine to 
be provided by an out-of-network (OON) provider.  
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the CPAP machine. You say that this service was medically necessary. The 
Plan denied your request. The Plan says coverage criteria has not been met. There are network providers 
available. 
 
Medicare rules say that plans can require enrollees to get care from network providers. The contract with the 
Plan says that the Plan has to pre-approve care from out-of-network providers only in cases involving 
emergencies, out of area urgent care and care that cannot be provided by network providers.  
The requested provider in this case is not a network provider with the Plan. The Plan has network providers 
available who can provide the items at issue in this appeal. We found no exception that would require the Plan 
to pre-approve these items. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve a continuous 
positive air pressure (CPAP) machine to be provided by an out-of-network (OON) provider.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that you want to get back on your feet and believe that 
IRF can help you get back to normal. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says you do not meet the criteria 
for admission to an IRF.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found you do not require treatment by multiple therapies. While the medical record 
supports a need for physical or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation 
services. Medically necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: Step-Therapy
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve Rituxan. 
 You asked the Plan to pre-approve Rituxan. You say that Rituxan is the only medication that is assisting the 
enrollee. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the step therapy requirements have not been met.  
 
Medicare covers Part B medications when they are reasonable and necessary but allows health plans to 
implement step therapy criteria. The Plan's contract indicates that it has implemented such criteria for certain 
Part B medications. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve Rituxan. Our reviewer says that 
Rituxan is not medically necessary. Our physician reviewer found that the enrollee has seropositive rheumatoid 
arthritis, and the requested medication is a new start. However, there is no indication that the enrollee has tried 
and failed the Plan's preferred step on alternative. Also, there is no indication that the enrollee has a 
contraindication to or would have an adverse effect from the Plan's preferred step one alternative. Therefore, 
the elements of coverage criteria have not been satisfied. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of Rituxan have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve Rituxan.
Appeal type: SNF
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve skilled nursing facility (SNF) care. 
 You asked the Plan to pre-approve SNF care. You say that the services are medically necessary to continue 
receiving care. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says you do not meet criteria for continued skilled 
nursing facility coverage.  
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that Medicare pays for care in a SNF when the four factors 
listed in the Medicare rules section are met. Custodial care is not covered. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve SNF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested SNF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found you do not have daily skilled nursing needs that require the specialized skill, 
knowledge, and judgment of a skilled professional nurse. You do not have daily skilled therapy needs that 
require the specialized skill, knowledge, and judgment of a skilled professional therapist. You do not require 
daily skilled nursing or skilled therapy on an inpatient basis in a skilled nursing facility (SNF) setting. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of SNF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve skilled nursing facility (SNF) care.