Persius/hicric huggingface dataset:
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that the services are medically necessary for 
the enrollee and will help them to gain mobility to be able to return home. The Plan denied your request. The 
Plan says the enrollee is receiving appropriate inpatient acute care and is currently unstable for transfer to an 
LTACH. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
 
 
 
 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found the enrollee appears to be improving with the current treatment and should only 
require short-term additional acute care services that can safely be provided at the current facility until more 
appropriate for a lower level of care. The enrollee does not require services at the LTACH that are not already 
available at the current facility. Completion of treatment at the current facility is recommended. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that the enrollee has not recovered from a mild stroke, 
has been weak and gets dizzy. You say the enrollee is not independent and needs IRF services to build up their 
strength. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee does not meet the Medicare guidelines for 
services in an IRF. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found that the complexity of the enrollee's nursing, medical, and rehabilitation needs does 
not require an acute hospital inpatient stay with an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation care. The 
enrollee does not require treatment by multiple therapies, including either physical therapy or occupational 
therapy, and an intensive rehabilitation therapy program. While the enrollee may have a need for physical 
therapy and/or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation services. 
Medically necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. There is not a reasonable expectation that 
the enrollee will be able to fully participate in and benefit from the intensive rehabilitation therapy program 
provided in an IRF. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve an IRF admission and services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that you say that you were in an LTACH and 
had to return to hospital for medical issues and are now ready to return to complete the extensive care. The Plan 
denied your request. The Plan says you are receiving medically necessary acute care in the current setting. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found the record indicates that you are improving but still require acute care services before 
transitioning to a lower level of care. You continue to receive acute care services, and these have not been 
denied. The medical record does not indicate that you require services that you are not currently receiving but 
that would be available at the LTACH facility. The elements of the coverage rules are not satisfied.  The 
requested service cannot be recommended. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve an IRF admission and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that the requested IRF admission is medically necessary, 
and you would like reconsideration based on the records submitted. The Plan denied your request. The Plan 
says the enrollee does not meet the requirements for an IRF admission. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found that the complexity of the enrollee's nursing, medical, and rehabilitation needs does 
not require an acute hospital inpatient stay with an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation care. The 
enrollee does not require treatment by multiple therapies, including either physical therapy or occupational 
therapy, and an intensive rehabilitation therapy program. While the enrollee may have a need for physical 
therapy and/or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive rehabilitation services. 
Medically necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. There is not a reasonable expectation that 
the enrollee will be able to fully participate in and benefit from the intensive rehabilitation therapy program 
provided in an IRF. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve an IRF admission and services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that the services are medically necessary for 
the enrollee to receive daily physician management with close medical monitoring along with intensive skilled 
services. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee can safely receive this care in another 
setting, such as a skilled nursing facility. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
 
 
 
 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found the record indicates that the enrollee is improving but still requires acute care 
services before transitioning to a lower level of care. The enrollee continues to receive acute care services, and 
these have not been denied. The medical record does not indicate that the enrollee requires services that they 
are not currently receiving but that would be available at the LTACH facility. The elements of the coverage 
rules are not satisfied. The requested service cannot be recommended. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve long term acute care hospital (LTACH) services.
Appeal type: Testing
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for procedure code 94761 billed for date of service February 3, 
2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the billed services. You say that medical records were provided. The Plan denied 
your request. The Plan says code 94761 is bundled into code 94664. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly.  
 
We find that procedure code 94761 has a status indicator of T on the Physician Fee Schedule. Since code 
94761 was billed with other payable services, this code is not payable. Based on this information, we decided 
that Medicare rules for coverage of the billed services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pay for procedure code 94761 billed for date of service February 3, 2022.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission 
and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that the enrollee requires multiple therapies after their 
stroke. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the services the enrollee needs can be provided safely in 
another setting such as a skilled nursing facility, home with home health services or home with outpatient 
therapy. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found the enrollee does not require treatment by multiple therapies. While the medical 
record supports a need for physical or occupational therapy, there is no documented need for intensive 
rehabilitation services. Medically necessary care can be provided in a different level of care. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admission and services.
Appeal type: DME/ Orthotics
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve procedure codes E2300, E2311, E2313, and E2377. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve procedure codes E2300, E2311, E2313, and E2377. You say that the 
requested wheelchair is medically necessary for the enrollee. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the 
seat elevator does not serve a primary medical purpose. The Plan also says that the requested features are not 
medically necessary. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that items and services that are not medically 
necessary are not covered.  
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve procedure codes E2300, E2311, E2313, 
and E2377. Our reviewer says that the requested items/services are not considered medically reasonable and 
necessary in this case. Our physician reviewer found the provided records document that the enrollee has 3-/5 
to 5/5 upper extremity strength, with no reported limitations of the hands or wrists and they are independent 
with eating, thus indicating he has adequate upper extremity strength and function to operate the wheelchair's 
power options with their own switches. The reviewer also found that the requested power seat elevation feature 
is statutorily non-covered as it serves no primary medical purpose. Therefore, the reviewer found that the 
requested upgraded electronics and seat elevation feature are not medically reasonable or necessary. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of procedure codes E2300, E2311, E2313, and E2377 have not been met. 
Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve procedure codes E2300, E2311, E2313, and 
E2377.
Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the laboratory service (87500) provided on July 26, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the laboratory service. You say that this service was necessary and is supported 
as billed. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says this code is not supported by the records provided. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly. 
Providers must report services with the appropriate CPT code. 
 
In this case, the CPT Code Manual definition of code 87500 is infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA 
or RNA); vancomycin resistance (eg, enterococcus species van A, van B), amplified probe technique. 
 We asked our coder to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to determine if the 
Plan was correct in denying the request to pay for the laboratory service. Our reviewer found the 
documentation submitted was reviewed and does not meet criteria. Medicare record does not include 
documentation of Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); vancomycin resistance (eg, 
enterococcus species van A, van B), amplified probe technique was performed.  Our reviewer was unable to 
cite report as this procedure was not found in medical record and therefore, cannot be verified. 
 
We looked at this coder's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the laboratory service have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pay for the laboratory service (87500) provided on July 26, 2022.
Appeal type: Surgery
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the requested services. You say that the enrollee has calcification secondary 
to radiation. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the enrollee does not meet the guideline 
requirements. 
 
The Plan follows Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that a TAVR procedure is only covered under certain 
medical indications. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the requested services. Our physician 
reviewer found that the enrollee has coronary artery disease and aortic stenosis. The most recent data from the 
echocardiogram and cardiac catheterization showed aortic stenosis, with hemodynamic indices consistent with 
moderate aortic stenosis, with valve area 1 - 1.25 sq cm. Guidelines would not support aortic valve replacement 
based on the submitted medical records. As a result, at this time the requested TAVR would not be considered 
medically necessary in this enrollees clinical management. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the requested services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve LTACH services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve the LTACH services. You say that the enrollee needs LTACH level of care 
as their current medical needs are too medically complex for a lower level of care. You say that the enrollee 
needs continued acute care to prevent further complications and possible readmission to a short-term acute care 
hospital. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says an LTACH admission is not medically necessary, and the 
enrollee's needs can be met in the current hospital setting. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that LTACH services are covered if they are medically 
necessary, reasonable, and appropriate for the diagnosis and condition of the enrollee. 
 
   
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve the LTACH services. Our reviewer says 
that the requested LTACH care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary in this case. Our 
physician reviewer found that the enrollee is receiving the appropriate level of care in the present setting. 
Continued care in the short term-term acute hospital is appropriate until the enrollee is stable to transfer to a 
lower level of care. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of the LTACH services have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan 
does not have to pre-approve LTACH services.
Appeal type: Inpatient Hospital
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve an IRF admission and services. 
 
You asked the Plan to pre-approve IRF care. You say that the enrollee meets criteria and will benefit from IRF 
services that cannot be accomplished at a lower level of care. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says the 
enrollee does not meet the requirements for an IRF admission. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that IRF admission is covered only when it is medically 
reasonable and necessary as described in the Medicare rules section. 
 
 We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve IRF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested IRF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found that based on the documentation provided, the Plans denial should be upheld. The 
enrollee does not require the intensity of services provided at an IRF. Specifically, the enrollee is not shown to 
require fifteen hours per week of rehabilitative services and regular physician evaluation. The enrollees care 
needs can be met at a lower level of care. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of IRF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve an IRF admission and services.
Appeal type: Practitioner Services
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the post emergency follow up care provided on October 1, 
2022, through October 5, 2022. 
 
You asked the Plan to pay for the post emergency follow up care. You say that the service was medically 
necessary. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says follow-up care is not covered when obtained outside of 
the United States. 
 
Medicare says that plans must pay for emergency and urgently needed services. The Plan contract says that 
while outside of the service area, coverage is limited to emergencies, urgently needed care, renal dialysis and pre-approved care.   
 
We looked at the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for 
coverage of the post emergency follow up care have not been met. Specifically, follow-up care is not covered 
when obtained outside of the United States. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have to pay for the 
post emergency follow up care provided on October 1, 2022, through October 5, 2022.
Appeal type: SNF
Decision: Unfavorable

 
We decided that the Plan does not have to pre-approve skilled nursing facility (SNF) care. 
 You asked the Plan to pre-approve SNF care. You say that the enrollee would like reconsideration because the 
services are medically necessary. The Plan denied your request. The Plan says a SNF admission is not 
medically necessary. 
 
The Plan must follow Medicare rules. The rules say that Medicare pays for care in a SNF when the four factors 
listed in the Medicare rules section are met. Custodial care is not covered. 
 
We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to 
determine if the Plan was correct in denying the request to pre-approve SNF care. Our reviewer says that the 
requested SNF care is not considered medically reasonable and necessary based on Medicare guidelines. Our 
physician reviewer found that the enrollee does not have daily skilled nursing needs that require the specialized 
skill, knowledge, and judgment of a skilled professional nurse. The enrollee does not have daily skilled therapy 
needs that require the specialized skill, knowledge, and judgment of a skilled professional therapist. The 
enrollee does not require daily skilled nursing or skilled therapy on an inpatient basis in a SNF setting. 
 
We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that 
Medicare rules for coverage of SNF care have not been met. Therefore, we decided that the Plan does not have 
to pre-approve SNF care.