Appeal type: Lab
Decision: Unfavorable

We decided that the Plandoes not haveto pay fordrug testing services provided to the enrollee on September 26, 2019.You asked the Planto pay forthe services. You say that this should be paid for.The Plandenied your request. The PlansaysCurrent Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 80307 and HCPCS G0483 remains not supported.The Plan must follow Medicare rules. Medicare rules say that providers must report services correctly. Providers must report services with the appropriate CPT code.In this case, the CPT Code Manual definition of the denied codes is:CPT 80307:Drug test(s), presumptive, any number of drug classes, qualitative; any number of devices or procedures, by instrument chemistry and analyzers (e.g., utilizing immunoassay [EIA, ELISA, EMIT, FPIA, IA, KIMS, RIA]), chromatography (e.g., GC, HPLC), and mass spectrometry either with or without chromatography, (DAT, DESI, GC-MS, GC-MS/MS, LC-MS, LC-MS/MS, LDTD, MALDI, TOF) includes sample validation when performed, per date of service (maps to 80301, 80302, 80303, 80304 and G0479HCPCS G0481:Drug test(s), definitive, utilizing (1) drug identification methods able to identify individual drugs and distinguish between structural isomers (but not necessarily stereoisomers), including, but not limited to gc/ms (any type, single or tandem) and lc/ms (any type, single or tandem and excluding immunoassays (e.g., ia, eia, elisa, emit, fpia) and enzymatic methods (e.g., alcohol dehydrogenase)), (2) stable isotope or other universally recognized internal standards in all samples (e.g., tocontrol for matrix effects, interferences and variations in signal strength), and (3) method or drug-specific calibration and matrix-matched quality control material (e.g., to control for instrument variations and mass spectral drift); qualitative or quantitative, all sources, includes specimen validity testing, per day; 8-14 drug class(es), including metabolite(s) if performed We asked our physician reviewer to carefully review the case file and apply the relevant Medicare rules to determine if the Planwas correct in denying the request to pay for the services. Our reviewer says that the services at issue in this case were not supported by the medical records. Our physician reviewer found Medicare rules state that if a lab bills laboratory services to Medicare, there must be a signed order from the treating physician (or a progress note to support the intent to order) and documentation to support the medical necessity of the ordered services. In this case, the case file contains only a Custom Toxicology Profile order form and the results of the testing. There are no medical records in the case file. There is no evidence that a review of the UDS was completed prior to ordering the UDT. There is no evidence that the UDT was tailored to the enrollee's medical condition. There is no documentation supporting an established relationship between the ordering physician and the enrollee. Therefore, the documentation does not support that the UDS and UDT were medically reasonable and necessary for the enrollee in this case.We looked at this physician's review, the file, and Medicare rules. Based on this information, we decided that Medicare rules for coverage of the services have not been met.Therefore, we decided that the Plandoes not haveto pay fordrug testing services provided to the enrollee on September 26, 2019.