Coding Locations Relative to One or Many Landmarks in Childhood
Authors: James Negen, Linda Bou Ali, Brittney Chere, Hannah E Roome, Yeachan Park, Marko Nardini
Journal: PLOS Computational Biology
Accepted: 2019-09-04T00:00:00Z


Cognitive development studies how information processing in the brain changes over the course of development. A key part of this question is how information is represented and stored in memory. This study examined allocentric (world-based) spatial memory, an important cognitive tool for planning routes and interacting with the space around us. This is typically theorized to use multiple landmarks all at once whenever it operates. In contrast, here we show that allocentric spatial memory frequently operates over a limited spatial window, much less than the full proximal scene, for children between 3.5 and 8.5 years old. The use of multiple landmarks increases gradually with age. Participants were asked to point to a remembered target location after a change of view in immersive virtual reality. A k-fold cross-validation model-comparison selected a model where young children usually use the target location’s vector to the single nearest landmark and rarely take advantage of the vectors to other nearby landmarks. The comparison models, which attempt to explain the errors as generic forms of noise rather than encoding to a single spatial cue, did not capture the distribution of responses as well. Parameter fits of this new single- versus multi-cue model are also easily interpretable and related to other variables of interest in development (age, executive function). Based on this, we theorize that spatial memory in humans develops through three advancing levels (but not strict stages): most likely to encode locations egocentrically (relative to the self), then allocentrically (relative to the world) but using only one landmark, and finally, most likely to encode locations relative to multiple parts of the scene.
Author summary: As children get older, they develop better ways to store information in memory. Here we investigate one key aspect of this: how they remember locations in a scene. We asked children from 3 to 9-years-old to remember a target location inside a virtual reality (VR) scene, and then to point to it after they had been ‘teleported’ to a new location within the scene. Young children in particular often made a certain kind of (relatively minor) error. They usually responded near the correct landmark, but had trouble correctly orienting their responses around this landmark, which would require them to also make use of the other landmarks. Our interpretation is that they do not necessarily store the full scene in memory. On most trials, they seem to store only the area immediately around the target. Formally, we made a mathematical model of this algorithm and used cross-validation to show that it holds better than alternative explanations. This provides new depth to our understanding of the different ways that memory changes during childhood. An important avenue for future research is testing the potential of VR tasks of this kind for screening and interventions to improve childhood science and math education.