Asymmetries around the visual field: From retina to cortex to behavior
Authors: Eline R Kupers, Noah C Benson, Marisa Carrasco, Jonathan Winawer
Journal: PLOS Computational Biology
Accepted: 2021-12-19T00:00:00Z


Visual performance varies around the visual field. It is best near the fovea compared to the periphery, and at iso-eccentric locations it is best on the horizontal, intermediate on the lower, and poorest on the upper meridian. The fovea-to-periphery performance decline is linked to the decreases in cone density, retinal ganglion cell (RGC) density, and V1 cortical magnification factor (CMF) as eccentricity increases. The origins of polar angle asymmetries are not well understood. Optical quality and cone density vary across the retina, but recent computational modeling has shown that these factors can only account for a small percentage of behavior. Here, we investigate how visual processing beyond the cone photon absorptions contributes to polar angle asymmetries in performance. First, we quantify the extent of asymmetries in cone density, midget RGC density, and V1 CMF. We find that both polar angle asymmetries and eccentricity gradients increase from cones to mRGCs, and from mRGCs to cortex. Second, we extend our previously published computational observer model to quantify the contribution of phototransduction by the cones and spatial filtering by mRGCs to behavioral asymmetries. Starting with photons emitted by a visual display, the model simulates the effect of human optics, cone isomerizations, phototransduction, and mRGC spatial filtering. The model performs a forced choice orientation discrimination task on mRGC responses using a linear support vector machine classifier. The model shows that asymmetries in a decision maker’s performance across polar angle are greater when assessing the photocurrents than when assessing isomerizations and are greater still when assessing mRGC signals. Nonetheless, the polar angle asymmetries of the mRGC outputs are still considerably smaller than those observed from human performance. We conclude that cone isomerizations, phototransduction, and the spatial filtering properties of mRGCs contribute to polar angle performance differences, but that a full account of these differences will entail additional contribution from cortical representations.
Author summary: The neural circuitry of the visual system is organized into multiple maps of the visual field. Each map is orderly, as nearby cells represent nearby points in the visual field. Each map is also non-uniform, in that some portions of the visual field are sampled more densely than others. These non-uniformities emerge from the first stage of processing, the photoreceptor array in the retina. The cone photoreceptors vary in density with eccentricity—they are denser in the central than the peripheral retina—and with polar angle—they are denser on the horizontal than vertical meridian. Our analyses show that both the eccentricity gradient and polar angle asymmetries become more pronounced in each of two subsequent processing stages, the midget retinal ganglion cells and primary visual cortex. We then implement a computational observer model incorporating several components of the early visual system. The model shows that the information present in the cone array can explain a small portion of the polar angle asymmetries in human visual performance, and the information present in the midget retinal ganglion cells can explain more, but still less than half, of the performance asymmetries. A full account of performance asymmetries will entail additional contributions from cortex.