PenguinMan/ARXIV huggingface dataset:
Evidence for time division multiplexing: Single neurons may encode simultaneous stimuli by switching between activity patterns
Authors: CARUSO, V. C.; Mohl, J. T.; Glynn, C.; Lee, J.; Willett, S. M.; Zaman, A.; Ebihara, A. F.; Estrada, R.; Freiwald, W.; Tokdar, S. T.; Groh, J. M.
Category: neuroscience
Date: 2018-06-26

How the brain preserves information about multiple simultaneous items is poorly understood. We report that single neurons can represent multiple different stimuli by interleaving different signals across time. We record single units in an auditory region, the inferior colliculus, while monkeys localize 1 or 2 simultaneous sounds. During dual-sound trials, we find that some neurons fluctuate between firing rates observed for each single sound, either on a whole-trial or on a sub-trial timescale. These fluctuations are correlated in pairs of neurons, can be predicted by the state of local field potentials prior to sound onset, and, in one monkey, can predict which sound will be reported first. We find corroborating evidence of fluctuating activity patterns in a separate data set involving responses of inferotemporal cortex neurons to multiple visual stimuli. Alternation between activity patterns corresponding to each of multiple items may therefore be a general strategy to enhance the brain processing capacity, potentially linking such disparate phenomena as variable neural firing, neural oscillations, and limits in attentional/memory capacity.
Stochastic satisficing account of confidence in uncertain value-based decisions
Authors: Hertz, U.; Bahrami, B.; Keramati, M.
Category: neuroscience
Date: 2018-03-01

Every day we make choices under uncertainty; choosing what route to work or which queue in a supermarket to take, for example. It is unclear how outcome variance, e.g. uncertainty about waiting time in a queue, affects decisions and confidence when outcome is stochastic and continuous. How does one evaluate and choose between an option with unreliable but high expected reward, and an option with more certain but lower expected reward? Here we used an experimental design where two choices payoffs took continuous values, to examine the effect of outcome variance on decision and confidence. We found that our participants probability of choosing the good (high expected reward) option decreased when the good or the bad options payoffs were more variable. Their confidence ratings were affected by outcome variability, but only when choosing the good option. Unlike perceptual detection tasks, confidence ratings correlated only weakly with decisions time, but correlated with the consistency of trial-by-trial choices. Inspired by the satisficing heuristic, we propose a \"stochastic satisficing\" (SSAT) model for evaluating options with continuous uncertain outcomes. In this model, options are evaluated by their probability of exceeding an acceptability threshold, and confidence reports scale with the chosen options thus-defined satisficing probability. Participants decisions were best explained by an expected reward model, while the SSAT model provided the best prediction of decision confidence. We further tested and verified the predictions of this model in a second experiment. Our model and experimental results generalize the models of metacognition from perceptual detection tasks to continuous-value based decisions. Finally, we discuss how the stochastic satisficing account of decision confidence serves psychological and social purposes associated with the evaluation, communication and justification of decision-making.\n\nAuthor SummaryEvery day we make several choices under uncertainty, like choosing a queue in a supermarket. However, the computational mechanisms underlying such decisions remain unknown. For example, how does one choose between an option with unreliable high expected reward, like the volatile express queue, and an option with more certain but lower expected reward in the standard queue? Inspired by bounded rationality and the notion of  satisficing, i.e. settling for a good enough option, we propose that such decisions are made by comparing the likelihood of different actions to surpass an acceptability threshold. When facing uncertain decisions, our participants confidence ratings were not consistent with the expected outcomes rewards, but instead followed the satisficing heuristic proposed here. Using an acceptability threshold may be especially useful when evaluating and justifying decisions under uncertainty.
Can model-free reinforcement learning operate over information stored in working-memory?
Authors: Feher da Silva, C.; Yao, Y.-W.; Hare, T. A.
Category: neuroscience
Date: 2018-07-26

Model-free learning creates stimulus-response associations. But what constitutes a stimulus? Are there limits to types of stimuli a model-free or habitual system can operate over? Most experiments on reward learning in humans and animals have used discrete sensory stimuli, but there is no algorithmic reason that model-free learning should be restricted to external stimuli, and recent theories have suggested that model-free processes may operate over highly abstract concepts and goals. Our study aimed to determine whether model-free learning processes can operate over environmental states defined by information held in working memory. Specifically, we tested whether or not humans can learn explicit temporal patterns of individually uninformative cues in a model-free manner. We compared the data from human participants in a reward learning paradigm using (1) a simultaneous symbol presentation condition or (2) a sequential symbol presentation condition, wherein the same visual stimuli were presented simultaneously or as a temporal sequence that required working memory. We found a significant effect of reward on human behavior in the sequential presentation condition, indicating that model-free learning can operate on information stored in working memory. Further analyses, however, revealed that the behavior of the participants contradicts the basic assumptions of our hypotheses, and it is possible that the observed effect of reward was generated by model-based rather than model-free learning. Thus it is not possible to draw any conclusions from out study regarding model-free learning of temporal sequences held in working memory. We conclude instead that careful thought should be given about how to best explain two-stage tasks to participants.
Pattern separation of spiketrains in hippocampal neurons
Authors: Madar, A. D.; Ewell, L. A.; Jones, M. V.
Category: neuroscience
Date: 2018-08-05

Pattern separation is a process that minimizes overlap between patterns of neuronal activity representing similar experiences. Theoretical work suggests that the dentate gyrus (DG) performs this role for memory processing but a direct demonstration is lacking. One limitation is the difficulty to measure DG inputs and outputs simultaneously. To rigorously assess pattern separation by DG circuitry, we used mouse brain slices to stimulate DG afferents and simultaneously record DG granule cells (GCs) and interneurons. Output spiketrains of GCs are more dissimilar than their input spiketrains, demonstrating for the first time temporal pattern separation at the level of single neurons in the DG. Pattern separation is larger in GCs than in fast-spiking interneurons and hilar mossy cells, and is amplified in CA3 pyramidal cells. Analysis of the neural noise and computational modelling suggest that this form of pattern separation is not explained by simple randomness and arises from specific presynaptic dynamics. Overall, by reframing the concept of pattern separation in dynamic terms and by connecting it to the physiology of different types of neurons, our study offers a new window of understanding in how hippocampal networks might support episodic memory.
Unifying Temporal Phenomena in Human Visual Cortex
Authors: Zhou, J.; Benson, N. C.; Kay, K.; Winawer, J.
Category: neuroscience
Date: 2018-07-08

Neuronal responses in visual cortex show a diversity of complex temporal properties. These properties include sub-additive temporal summation, response reduction with repeated or sustained stimuli (adaptation), and slower dynamics at low stimulus contrast. Here, we hypothesize that these seemingly disparate effects can be explained by a single, shared computational mechanism. We propose a model consisting of a linear stage, followed by history-dependent gain control. The model accounts for these various temporal phenomena, tested against an unusually diverse set of measurements - intracranial electrodes in patients, fMRI, and macaque single unit spiking. The model further enables us to uncover a systematic and rich variety of temporal encoding strategies across visual cortex: First, temporal receptive field shape differs both across and within visual field maps. Second, later visual areas show more rapid and pronounced adaptation. Our study provides a new framework to understand the transformation between visual input and dynamical cortical responses.\n\nAuthor SummaryThe nervous system extracts meaning from the distribution of light over space and time. Spatial vision has been a highly successful research area, and the spatial receptive field has served as a fundamental and unifying concept that spans perception, computation, and physiology. While there has also been a large interest in temporal vision, the temporal domain has lagged the spatial domain in terms of quantitative models of how signals are transformed across the visual hierarchy. Here we present a model of temporal dynamics of neuronal responses in human cerebral cortex. We show that the model can accurately predict responses at the millisecond scale using intracortical electrodes in patient volunteers, and that the same model generalizes to multiple types of other measurements, including functional MRI and action potentials from monkey cortex. Further, we show that a single model can account for a variety of temporal phenomena, including short-term adaptation and slower dynamics at low stimulus contrast. By developing a computational model and showing that it successfully generalizes across measurement types, cortical areas, and stimuli, we provide new insights into how time-varying images are encoded and transformed into dynamic cortical responses.
A computational model of shared fine-scale structure in the human connectome
Authors: Guntupalli, J. S.; Feilong, M.; Haxby, J. V.
Category: neuroscience
Date: 2018-04-01

Variation in cortical connectivity profiles is typically modeled as having a coarse spatial scale parcellated into interconnected brain areas. We created a high-dimensional common model of the human connectome to search for fine-scale structure that is shared across brains. Projecting individual connectivity data into this new common model connectome accounts for substantially more variance in the human connectome than do previous models. This newly discovered shared structure is closely related to fine-scale distinctions in representations of information. These results reveal a shared fine-scale structure that is a major component of the human connectome that coexists with coarse-scale, areal structure. This shared fine-scale structure was not captured in previous models and was, therefore, inaccessible to analysis and study.\n\nAuthor SummaryResting state fMRI has become a ubiquitous tool for measuring connectivity in normal and diseased brains. Current dominant models of connectivity are based on coarse-scale connectivity among brain regions, ignoring fine-scale structure within those regions. We developed a high-dimensional common model of the human connectome that captures both coarse and fine-scale structure of connectivity shared across brains. We showed that this shared fine-scale structure is related to fine-scale distinctions in representation of information, and our model accounts for substantially more shared variance of connectivity compared to previous models. Our model opens new territory -- shared fine-scale structure, a dominant but mostly unexplored component of the human connectome -- for analysis and study.
1/f neural noise is a better predictor of schizophrenia than neural oscillations
Authors: Peterson, E. J.; Rosen, B. Q.; Campbell, A. M.; Belger, A.; Voytek, B.
Category: neuroscience
Date: 2018-06-27

Diagnosis and symptom severity in schizophrenia are associated with irregularities across neural oscillatory frequency bands, including theta, alpha, beta, and gamma. However, electroencephalographic signals consist of both periodic and aperiodic activity characterized by the (1/fX) shape in the power spectrum. In this paper we investigated oscillatory and aperiodic activity differences between patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls during a target detection task. Separation into periodic and aperiodic components revealed that the steepness of the power spectrum better predicted group status than traditional band-limited oscillatory power in a classification analysis. Aperiodic activity also outperformed the predictions made using participants behavioral responses. Additionally, the differences in aperiodic activity were highly consistent across all electrodes. In sum, compared to oscillations the aperiodic activity appears to be a more accurate and more robust way to differentiate patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls.

Significance statementUnderstanding the neurobiological origins of schizophrenia and identifying reliable and consistent biomarkers are of critical importance to improving treatment of that disease. Numerous studies have reported disruptions to neural oscillations in patients with schizophrenia. This has, in part, led to schizophrenia being characterized as a disease of disrupted neural coordination, reflected by changes in frequency band power. We report however that changes in the aperiodic signal can also predict clinical status. Unlike band-limited power though, aperiodic activity predicts status better than participants own behavioral performance and acts as a consistent predictor across all electrodes. Alterations in the aperiodic signal are consistent with well-established inhibitory neuron dysfunctions associated with schizophrenia, allowing for a direct link between noninvasive EEG and chronic, widespread, neurobiological deficits.
Decoding across sensory modalities reveals common supramodal signatures of conscious perception
Authors: Sanchez, G.; Hartmann, T.; Fusca, M.; Weisz, N.
Category: neuroscience
Date: 2018-09-28

An increasing number of studies highlight common brain regions and processes in mediating conscious sensory experience. While most studies have been performed in the visual modality, it is implicitly assumed that similar processes are involved in other sensory modalities. However, the existence of supramodal neural processes related to conscious perception has not been convincingly shown so far. Here, we aim to directly address this issue by investigating whether neural correlates of conscious perception in one modality can predict conscious perception in a different modality. In two separate experiments, we presented participants with successive blocks of near-threshold tasks involving tactile, visual or auditory stimuli during the same magnetoencephalography (MEG) acquisition. Using decoding analysis in the post-stimulus period between sensory modalities, our first experiment uncovered supramodal spatio-temporal neural activity patterns predicting conscious perception of the feeble stimulation. Strikingly, these supramodal patterns included activity in primary sensory regions not directly relevant to the task (e.g. neural activity in visual cortex predicting conscious perception of auditory near-threshold stimulation). We carefully replicate our results in a control experiment that furthermore show that the relevant patterns are independent of the type of report (i.e. whether conscious perception was reported by pressing or withholding a button-press). Using standard paradigms for probing neural correlates of conscious perception, our findings reveal a common signature of conscious access across sensory modalities and illustrate the temporally late and widespread broadcasting of neural representations, even into task-unrelated primary sensory processing regions.
The most informative neural code accounts for population heterogeneity
Authors: Zavitz, E.; Price, N. S. C.
Category: neuroscience
Date: 2018-02-20

Perception is produced by  reading out the representation of a sensory stimulus contained in the firing rates of a population of neurons. To examine experimentally how populations code information, a common approach is to decode a linearly-weighted sum of the neurons firing rates. This approach is popular because of its biological validity: weights in a computational decoder are analogous to synaptic strengths. For neurons recorded in vivo, weights are highly variable when derived through machine learning methods, but it is unclear what neuronal properties explain this variability, and how the variability affects decoding performance. To address this, we recorded from neurons in the middle temporal area (MT) of anesthetized marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) viewing stimuli comprising a sheet of dots that moved coherently in one of twelve different directions. We found that high gain and direction selectivity both predicted that a neuron would be weighted more highly in an optimised decoding model. Although learned weights differed markedly from weights chosen according to a priori rules based on a neurons tuning profile, decoding performance was only marginally better for the learned weights. In the models with a priori rules, selectivity is the best predictor of weighting, and defining weights according to a neurons preferred direction and selectivity improves decoding performance to very near the maximum level possible, as defined by the learned weights.\n\nNew & NoteworthyWe examined which aspects of a neurons tuning account for its contribution to sensory coding. Strongly direction-selective neurons were weighted most highly by machine learning algorithms trained to discriminate motion direction. Models with a priori defined decoding weights demonstrate that the learned weighting scheme causally improved direction representation by a neuronal population. Optimising decoders (using machine learning) lead to only marginally better performance than decoders based purely on a neurons preferred direction and selectivity.
DLPFC Transcriptome Defines Two Molecular Subtypes of Schizophrenia
Authors: Rhodes, C. H.; Bowen, E. F. W.; Burgess, J. L.; Granger, R.
Category: neuroscience
Date: 2018-02-16

The Clinical Brain Disorders Branch of the Intramural Research Program at the National Institutes of Health assembled a large collection of frozen post-mortem human brains from individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and other psychiatric diagnoses, as well as matched control individuals. Illumina HumanHT-12 v4 expression array data was collected from dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the data deposited at dbGaP (Study ID: phs000979). We report an analysis of the data from the 189 adult schizophrenics and 206 adult controls in that cohort.\n\nTranscripts from 633 genes are differentially expressed in the DLPFC of schizophrenics as compared to the controls at levels of statistical significance which survive Bonferroni correction. Seventeen of those genes are differentially expressed at a level of statistical significance less than 10-8 after Bonferroni correction.\n\nWeighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) of the schizophrenic subjects using differentially expressed gene module eigengenes divides them into two groups, \"type 1\" and \"type 2.\" There are 2,635 genes differentially expressed in the DLPFC of type 2 schizophrenics at a level of statistical significance which survives Bonferroni correction. Of them 221 have P-values less than 10-15 after Bonferroni correction. In the type 1 schizophrenics however, only 6 genes are differentially expressed in the DLPFC at a level of statistical significance which survives Bonferroni correction. This striking difference in their DLPFC transcriptomes emphasizes the fundamental biologic difference between these two groups of patients.
Effect size and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature - a systematic review
Authors: Carneiro, C. F. D.; Moulin, T. C.; Macleod, M. R.; Amaral, O. B.
Category: neuroscience
Date: 2018-03-08

Proposals to increase research reproducibility frequently call for focusing on effect sizes instead of p values, as well as for increasing the statistical power of experiments. However, it is unclear to what extent these two concepts are indeed taken into account in basic biomedical science. To study this in a real-case scenario, we performed a systematic review of effect sizes and statistical power in studies on learning of rodent fear conditioning, a widely used behavioral task to evaluate memory. Our search criteria yielded 410 experiments comparing control and treated groups in 122 articles. Interventions had a mean effect size of 29.5%, and amnesia caused by memory-impairing interventions was nearly always partial. Mean statistical power to detect the average effect size observed in well-powered experiments with significant differences (37.2%) was 65%, and was lower among studies with non-significant results. Only one article reported a sample size calculation, and our estimated sample size to achieve 80% power considering typical effect sizes and variances (15 animals per group) was reached in only 12.2% of experiments. Actual effect sizes correlated with effect size inferences made by readers on the basis of textual descriptions of results only when findings were non-significant, and neither effect size nor power correlated with study quality indicators, number of citations or impact factor of the publishing journal. In summary, effect sizes and statistical power have a wide distribution in the rodent fear conditioning literature, but do not seem to have a large influence on how results are described or cited. Failure to take these concepts into consideration might limit attempts to improve reproducibility in this field of science.