Office Action 1: Non-Final Rejection (2023-12-07)
Rejection types: 102 - Lack of Novelty, 103 - Obviousness

CLAIMS:
Listing of Claims:

This listing of claims reflects all claim amendments and replaces all prior versions, and listings, of claims in the application. Material to be inserted is in bold and underline, and material to be deleted is in or in double brackets \[\[ \]\]. Any cancellations are without prejudice.

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:

1\. (Original) A screen projection control method applied to a first device, the method comprising:acquiring touch information sent by a second device, wherein the touch information comprises a touch type, a coordinate position of a touch point on a screen of the second device, and a screen rotation direction of the second device, the screen of the second device and a screen of the first device display a same interface; and
determining, according to the screen rotation direction of the second device, a target position on the screen of the first device corresponding to the coordinate position of the touch point, wherein the target position is a position for performing a touch operation corresponding to the touch type.

2\. (Original) The method according to claim 1, wherein the determining, according to the screen rotation direction of the second device, the target position on the screen of the first device corresponding to the coordinate position of the touch point comprises:acquiring screen information of the first device; and
performing, according to the screen information of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device, a conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point, to obtain the target position.

3\. (Original) The method according to claim 2, wherein the screen information of the first device comprises a screen rotation direction of the first device and size information of the screen of the first device, and the performing, according to the screen information of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device, the conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point, to obtain the target position comprises:

when it is determined that the screen rotation direction of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device are the same, performing, according to the size information of the screen of the first device, the conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point based on a first preset rule, to obtain the target position; and
when it is determined that the screen rotation direction of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device are different, performing, according to the size information of the screen of the first device, the conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point based on a second preset rule, to obtain the target position.

4\. (Original) The method according to claim 3, wherein the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point; the target position comprises a target width coordinate and a target height coordinate; the size information of the screen of the first device comprises a width and a height of the screen of the first device.

5\. (Original) The method according to claim 4, wherein the first preset rule is TX=Width\*OX, TY=Height\*OY, wherein TX is the target width coordinate, Width is the width of the screen of the first device, OX is the proportional width coordinate of the touch point, TY is the target height coordinate, Height is the height of the screen of the first device, and OY is the proportional height coordinate of the touch point.

6\. (Original) The method according to claim 4, wherein the second preset rule is TX=Width\*OY, TY=Height\*(1-OX), wherein TX is the target width coordinate, Width is the width of the screen of the first device, OY is the proportional height coordinate of the touch point, TY is the target height coordinate, Height is the height of the screen of the first device, and OX is the proportional width coordinate of the touch point.

7\. (Currently amended) The method according to claim\[\[s\]\] 1\[\[ to 6\]\], wherein the touch information is generated based on a preset touch event transfer protocol.

8\. (Original) A screen projection control method applied to a second device, the method comprising:generating, in response to a touch operation acting on a screen of the second device, corresponding touch information, wherein the touch information comprises a touch type, a coordinate position of a touch point corresponding to the touch operation on the screen of the second device, and a screen rotation direction of the second device;
sending the touch information to a first device, to enable the first device to determine, according to the screen rotation direction of the second device, a target position on a screen of the first device corresponding to the coordinate position of the touch point, wherein the target position is a position for performing a touch operation corresponding to the touch type.

9\. (Original) The method according to claim 8, wherein the generating the corresponding touch information comprises:acquiring the touch type corresponding to the touch operation and the screen rotation direction of the second device; and
generating, based on a preset touch event transfer protocol, the touch information according to the touch type, the coordinate position of the touch point and the screen rotation direction of the second device.

10\. (Currently amended) The method according to claim 8\[\[ or 9\]\], wherein the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point, and the method further comprises:acquiring size information of the screen of the second device, wherein the size information of the screen of the second device comprises a width of the screen of the second device and a height of the screen of the second device;
acquiring, for each touch point, an actual width coordinate and an actual height coordinate of the touch point, and acquiring a ratio of the actual width coordinate to the width of the screen of the second device and using \[\[it\]\]the ratio as the proportional width coordinate of the touch point; and
acquiring a ratio of the actual height coordinate to the height of the screen of the second device and using \[\[it\]\]the ratio as the proportional height coordinate of the touch point.

11-20. (Canceled)1219

21\. (New) The method according to claim 9, wherein the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point, and the method further comprises:acquiring size information of the screen of the second device, wherein the size information of the screen of the second device comprises a width of the screen of the second device and a height of the screen of the second device;
acquiring, for each touch point, an actual width coordinate and an actual height coordinate of the touch point, and acquiring a ratio of the actual width coordinate to the width of the screen of the second device and using the ratio as the proportional width coordinate of the touch point;
and acquiring a ratio of the actual height coordinate to the height of the screen of the second device and using the ratio as the proportional height coordinate of the touch point.

22\. (New) A screen projection control device applied to a first device, the screen projection control device comprising: at least one processor and a memory;wherein the memory has, stored therein, computer executable instructions; and
the at least one processor performs the computer executable instructions stored in the memory, to enable the at least one processor to:
acquire touch information sent by a second device, wherein the touch information comprises a touch type, a coordinate position of a touch point on a screen of the second device, and a screen rotation direction of the second device, the screen of the second device and a screen of the first device display a same interface; and
determine, according to the screen rotation direction of the second device, a target position on the screen of the first device corresponding to the coordinate position of the touch point, wherein the target position is a position for performing a touch operation corresponding to the touch type.

23\. (New) The screen projection control device according to claim 22, wherein the at least one processor is specifically enabled to:acquire screen information of the first device; and
perform, according to the screen information of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device, a conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point, to obtain the target position.

24\. (New) The screen projection control device according to claim 23, wherein the screen information of the first device comprises a screen rotation direction of the first device and size information of the screen of the first device, and the at least one processor is specifically enabled to:when it is determined that the screen rotation direction of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device are the same, perform, according to the size information of the screen of the first device, the conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point based on a first preset rule, to obtain the target position; and
when it is determined that the screen rotation direction of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device are different, perform, according to the size information of the screen of the first device, the conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point based on a second preset rule, to obtain the target position.

25\. (New) The screen projection control device according to claim 24, wherein the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point; the target position comprises a target width coordinate and a target height coordinate; the size information of the screen of the first device comprises a width and a height of the screen of the first device.

26\. (New) The screen projection control device according to claim 25, wherein the first preset rule is TX=Width\*OX, TY=Height\*OY, wherein TX is the target width coordinate, Width is the width of the screen of the first device, OX is the proportional width coordinate of the touch point, TY is the target height coordinate, Height is the height of the screen of the first device, and OY is the proportional height coordinate of the touch point.

27\. (New) The screen projection control device according to claim 25, wherein the second preset rule is TX=Width\*OY, TY=Height\*(1-OX), wherein TX is the target width coordinate, Width is the width of the screen of the first device, OY is the proportional height coordinate of the touch point, TY is the target height coordinate, Height is the height of the screen of the first device, and OX is the proportional width coordinate of the touch point.

28\. (New) A screen projection control device applied to a second device, the screen projection control device comprising: at least one processor and a memory;wherein the memory has, stored therein, computer executable instructions; and
the at least one processor executes the computer executable instructions stored in the memory, to enable the at least one processor to execute the screen projection control method according to claim 8.

29\. (New) A non-transitory computer readable storage medium in which computer executable instructions are stored, wherein when a processor executes the computer executable instructions, the screen projection control method according to claim 1 is implemented.

30\. (New) A non-transitory computer readable storage medium in which computer executable instructions are stored, wherein when a processor executes the computer executable instructions, the screen projection control method according to claim 8 is implemented.

OFFICE ACTION:
Notice of Pre-AIA  or AIA  Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA  35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA  35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA  to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1-4 7-10 21-25 and 28-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee (US 2019.0295498).
Regarding claim 1, Lee disclose:
A screen projection control method applied to a first device, the method comprising: acquiring touch information sent by a second device, wherein the touch information comprises a touch type, a coordinate position of a touch point on a screen of the second device, and a screen rotation direction of the second device, the screen of the second device and a screen of the first device display a same interface; and determining, according to the screen rotation direction of the second device, a target position on the screen of the first device corresponding to the coordinate position of the touch point, wherein the target position is a position for performing a touch operation corresponding to the touch type (see Fig. 3, 5, 9, 11; [0072, 0103, 0111-0128, 0133]; second device 100 to send touch information (type and coordinate of touch on 110) as well as orientation (rotation) of 100; where 100 and 200 show some interface; where based on touch information of 100 the target positions (e.g., desired input) is determined on 200).
Regarding claim 2, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the determining, according to the screen rotation direction of the second device, the target position on the screen of the first device corresponding to the coordinate position of the touch point comprises: acquiring screen information of the first device; and performing, according to the screen information of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device, a conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point, to obtain the target position (see Fig. 3, 5, 9, 11; [0072, 0103, 0111-0128, 0133]).
Regarding claim 3, the rejection of claim 2 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the screen information of the first device comprises a screen rotation direction of the first device and size information of the screen of the first device, and the performing, according to the screen information of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device, the conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point, to obtain the target position comprises:  when it is determined that the screen rotation direction of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device are the same, performing, according to the size information of the screen of the first device, the conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point based on a first preset rule, to obtain the target position; and when it is determined that the screen rotation direction of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device are different, performing, according to the size information of the screen of the first device, the conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point based on a second preset rule, to obtain the target position (see Fig. 11; [0115, 0119, 0123, 0128, 0133])
Regarding claim 4, the rejection of claim 3 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point; the target position comprises a target width coordinate and a target height coordinate; the size information of the screen of the first device comprises a width and a height of the screen of the first device (see Fig. 11; [0105, 0115, 0119, 0123, 0128, 0133])
Regarding claim 7, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the touch information is generated based on a preset touch event transfer protocol (see Fig. 3, 5, 9, 11; [0072, 0103, 0111-0128, 0133]; where the ‘preset touch even transfer protocol’ is the touch information sent)
Regarding claim 8, Lee disclose:
A screen projection control method applied to a second device, the method comprising: generating, in response to a touch operation acting on a screen of the second device, corresponding touch information, wherein the touch information comprises a touch type, a coordinate position of a touch point corresponding to the touch operation on the screen of the second device, and a screen rotation direction of the second device; sending the touch information to a first device, to enable the first device to determine, according to the screen rotation direction of the second device, a target position on a screen of the first device corresponding to the coordinate position of the touch point, wherein the target position is a position for performing a touch operation corresponding to the touch type (see Fig. 3, 5, 9, 11; [0072, 0103, 0111-0128, 0133]; second device 100 generates touch information (type and coordinate of touch on 110) as well as orientation (rotation) of 100 to send to first device 200; where 100 and 200 show some interface; where based on touch information of 100 the target positions (e.g., desired input) is determined on 200).
Regarding claim 9, the rejection of claim 8 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the generating the corresponding touch information comprises: acquiring the touch type corresponding to the touch operation and the screen rotation direction of the second device; and generating, based on a preset touch event transfer protocol, the touch information according to the touch type, the coordinate position of the touch point and the screen rotation direction of the second device (see Fig. 3, 5, 9, 11; [0115, 0119, 0123, 0128, 0133]; where the ‘preset touch even transfer protocol’ is the touch information sent)
Regarding claim 10, the rejection of claim 8 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
wherein the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point, and the method further comprises: acquiring size information of the screen of the second device, wherein the size information of the screen of the second device comprises a width of the screen of the second device and a height of the screen of the second device; acquiring, for each touch point, an actual width coordinate and an actual height coordinate of the touch point, and acquiring a ratio of the actual width coordinate to the width of the screen of the second device and using the ratio as the proportional width coordinate of the touch point; and acquiring a ratio of the actual height coordinate to the height of the screen of the second device and using the ratio as the proportional height coordinate of the touch point (see Fig. 11; [0105, 0115, 0119, 0123, 0128, 0133])
Regarding claim 21, the rejection of claim 9 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point, and the method further comprises: acquiring size information of the screen of the second device, wherein the size information of the screen of the second device comprises a width of the screen of the second device and a height of the screen of the second device; acquiring, for each touch point, an actual width coordinate and an actual height coordinate of the touch point, and acquiring a ratio of the actual width coordinate to the width of the screen of the second device and using the ratio as the proportional width coordinate of the touch point; and acquiring a ratio of the actual height coordinate to the height of the screen of the second device and using the ratio as the proportional height coordinate of the touch point (see Fig. 11; [0105, 0115, 0119, 0123, 0128, 0133]).
Regarding claim 22, claim 22 is rejected under the same rationale as claim 1, where Lee further disclose:
at least one processor and a memory; wherein the memory has, stored therein, computer executable instructions; and the at least one processor performs the computer executable instructions stored in the memory, to enable the at least one processor (see [0037-0038])
Regarding claims 23-25 and 28. Claims 23-25 and 28 are rejected under the same rationale as claims 2-4 and 6, respectively.
Regarding claim 29, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
A non-transitory computer readable storage medium in which computer executable instructions are stored, wherein when a processor executes the computer executable instructions, the screen projection control method according to claim 1 (see [0037-0038])
Regarding claim 29, the rejection of claim 8 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
A non-transitory computer readable storage medium in which computer executable instructions are stored, wherein when a processor executes the computer executable instructions, the screen projection control method according to claim 8 (see [0037-0038])
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA  35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA  35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA  to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
Claim(s) 5-6 and 26 -27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Yang (CN 108255398).
Regarding claim 5, the rejection of claim 4 is incorporated herein. While Lee is able to determine the target coordinates based on the landscape or portrait rotation of second device 100, it is not explicit as to, but Yang disclose:
the first preset rule is TX=Width*OX, TY=Height*OY, wherein TX is the target width coordinate, Width is the width of the screen of the first device, OX is the proportional width coordinate of the touch point, TY is the target height coordinate, Height is the height of the screen of the first device, and OY is the proportional height coordinate of the touch point (see pg. 5-6, where the dimensions of a smaller screen can be transformed to match the coordinates of the larger screen in proportion, thus would have been obvious to try by one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to applicant’s effective filing date, since there are a finite number of identified, predictable potential solutions (e.g., various equations to arrive at a proportional alignment of a target coordinates between displays) to be pursued by one of ordinary skill in the art with a reasonable expectation of success.).
Regarding claim 6, the rejection of claim 4 is incorporated herein. While Lee is able to determine the target coordinates based on the landscape or portrait rotation of second device 100, it is not explicit as to, but Yang disclose:
the second preset rule is TX=Width*OY, TY=Height*(1-OX), wherein TX is the target width coordinate, Width is the width of the screen of the first device, OY is the proportional height coordinate of the touch point, TY is the target height coordinate, Height is the height of the screen of the first device, and OX is the proportional width coordinate of the touch point (see pg. 5-6, where the dimensions of a smaller screen can be transformed to match the coordinates of the larger screen in proportion, thus would have been obvious to try by one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to applicant’s effective filing date, since there are a finite number of identified, predictable potential solutions (e.g., various equations to arrive at a proportional alignment of a target coordinates between displays) to be pursued by one of ordinary skill in the art with a reasonable expectation of success).
Regarding claims 26-27, claims 26-27 are rejected under the same rationale as claims 5-6, respectively.
Conclusion

APPLICANT REBUTTAL: Remarks:
These remarks are responsive to the Office action dated December 7, 2023. Prior to entry of this response, claims 1-10 and 21-30 were pending in the application. By way of this response, claims 1, 4, 8, 10, 21, 22, and 25 are amended. Applicant respectfully requests reconsideration of the application and allowance of the pending claims.
Rej
ections under 35 U.S.C.
@
Claims 1-4, 7-10, 21-25, and 28-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2019/0295498 (Lee et al., hereinafter Lee).
Applicant respectfully traverses the rejection. Nonetheless, Applicant amends claim 1 to recite "wherein the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point, the proportional width coordinate of the touch point being a proportion of an actual width coordinate of the touch point to a width of the screen of the second device, the proportional height coordinate of the touch point being a proportion of an actual height coordinate of the touch point to a height of the screen of the second device, and wherein the touch information is determined based on a user inputting a touch operation corresponding to the touch type on the screen of the second device." Support for this amendment can be found at least at Pars. [0050], [0067], and [0096] of the subject application. No new matter is added.
Applicant respectfully submits that Lee fails to disclose or suggest at least the following technical features of claim 1 (emphasis added):
a) acquiring touch information sent by a second device, wherein the touch
information comprises a touch type, a coordinate position of a touch point on a screen of the second device, and a screen rotation direction of the second device,
wherein
the screen of the second device and a screen of the first device display a same
interface, wherein the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional hei
gz
ht coordinate of the touch point, the proportional width coordinate of the touch point bein
z a
proportion of an actual width coordinate of the touch point to a width of the
screen of the second device, the proportional hei
gz
ht coordinate of the touch point bein
gz
a proportion of an actual hei
gz
ht coordinate of the touch point to a hei
gz
ht of the screen of the second device, and wherein the touch information is determined based on a user inputtin
g
a touch operation correspondin
g
to the
touch type on the screen of the second device
;
b) determining, according to the screen rotation direction of the second device, a
target position on the screen of the first device corresponding to the coordinate position of the touch point, wherein the target position is a position for
performing the touch operation corresponding to the touch type.
Lee discloses a method for supporting user input and electronic device supporting the same. Specifically, as disclosed by Lee, "when a user input using a user's body or a stylus pen is applied to at least part of the first region included in the graphical user interface 30 described above with reference to FIGS. 5, 6, 7, and 8, the processor 150 may convert the first coordinate value according to the user input into
the second coordinate value correspondin
g
to the size or area of the displa
y
210 of the external displa
y
device 200 to provide the second coordinate value to the external displa
y
device 200.
As such, the external display device 200 may apply the user input applied to the electronic device 100, to the screen 20 being output by that the display 210 by receiving and processing the second coordinate value" (see Par. [0109] of Lee);
"For example, the processor
may convert the
fi
rst coordinates into the second coordinates correspondin
g
to the size, area, or resolution of the displa
y
of the external displa
y
device 200, and may provide the external displa
y
device 200 with data for the converted second coordinates"
(see Par. [0128] of Lee); and "For example, when the electronic device 100 is mounted on the mediation device 300 in FIG. 2 in
a first orientation (e.
.
, landscape),
... when the orientation of the electronic device 100 is changed to
a second orientation (e.
g
., portrait),
the processor 150 may reduce the graphical user interface 30 in the central region of the active region of the electronic device 100, based on the first orientation and the second orientation" (see Par. [0133] of Lee).
As can be seen from the above disclosure of Lee, when the user operates input on the graphical user interface of the electronic device 100, the electronic device 100 detects
inputs of the user as first coordinates, performs the conversion from the first coordinates to the second coordinates corresponding to the size or area of the external display device 200, and provides data of the second coordinates to the external display device 200 so as to enable the display of the user's input on the external display device 200. It is the electronic device 100 which receives the user's input that converts the coordinates rather than the external display device 200 which displays the converted coordinates, in fact, the external display device 200 does NOT perform conversion of coordinates. By contrast, as recited in amended claim 1, the touch information is determined at the second device which receives the user's input and sends the touch information to the first device, and then the first device determines the target position based on the touch information.
Moreover, second coordinates are converted coordinates of the inputs of the user and cannot be regarded as being equivalent to the coordinate position of a touch point on a screen of the second device as recited in amended claim 1, even if the second coordinates may be sent to and processed by the external display device 200, such processing cannot be regarded as being equivalent to the determination of the target position based on the touch information as recited in amended claim 1.
Further, although Lee discloses the orientation of the electronic device 100, however, such orientation is simply used at the electronic device 100 side for determining the display of the user interface 30, rather than being sent to the external display device 200. In fact, in Lee, the information exchanged between the external display device 200 and the electronic device 100 is "second coordinates," Lee mentions nothing about the touch type, the proportional width coordinate and the proportional height coordinate of the touch point, and the screen rotation direction of the second device sent from the second device to the first device as defined in amended claim 1, thus Lee fails to disclose the "touch information" as defined in amended claim 1, and consequently, Lee fails to disclose limitations related to the "touch information," such as the acquiring of the touch information (see the above distinguishing feature a) and the determination of the target position based on the screen rotation direction of the second device in the touch information (see the above distinguishing feature b). Therefore, Lee does not disclose or suggest at least the above distinguishing features a and b of claim 1.
Accordingly, Applicant respectfully submits that claim 1 as currently amended is not anticipated by or obvious over Lee, and thus claim 1 is in condition for allowance.
Claims 8 and 22 have been amended in a similar manner as claim 1, and thus claims
8 and 22 are also in condition for allowance for similar reasons.
Claims 2-4, 7, 9-10, 21, 23-25 and 28-30 depend from amended claims 1 and 8, respectively, and thus Applicant respectfully submits the claims are in condition for allowance at least for the reason of dependence from an allowable claim.
Therefore, for at least the reasons set forth above, withdrawal of the rejection of claims 1-4, 7-10, 21-25, and 28-30 under 35 U.S.C. 102 is respectfully requested.
Rej
ections under 35 U.S.C.
@
Claims 5, 6, 26, and 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Chinese Reference No. CN 108255398 (Yang et al., hereinafter Yang).
Applicant respectfully traverses the rejection.
Yang discloses a mobile device control method. Specifically, Yang discloses, "the mobile device receives the first coordinate value associated with the user's touch screen operation from the car, and the mobile device determines the second coordinate value according to the first coordinate value and the conversion relationship" (see Pars. [0069]- [0070] of Yang); "the phone can obtain its own screen size information, and according to the screen size information received from the car and its own screen size information to determine the coordinate conversion relationship between the car screen and the phone screen" (see Par. [0075] of Yang); "In particular, the conversion between the first and second coordinate systems (i.e. coordinate conversion) may include coordinate rotation and or coordinate scaling" (see Par. [0076] of Yang); and "If the available car screen size is c *d (c, d is the number ofpixels), the scaling value may be, for example, (c a, d b)" (see
Par. [0084] of Yang).
As can be seen from the above, Yang discloses that the mobile device calculates the coordinate conversion relationship between the car screen and the phone screen according to the screen size information received from the car and the phone's own screen size information, and then converts the first coordinate value received from the car associated with the user's touch screen operation into the second coordinate value of the
mobile device according to the above coordinate conversion relationship. However, in Yang, the first coordinate value sent from the car to the mobile device is the actual position information at the car, but in amended claim 1, the coordinate position included in the touch information sent from the second device to the first device includes a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point, with the proportional width coordinate of the touch point being a proportion of an actual width coordinate of the touch point to a width of the screen of the second device and the proportional height coordinate of the touch point being a proportion of an actual height coordinate of the touch point to a height of the screen of the second device, so the position information exchanged in amended claim 1 is proportional position information. Therefore, Yang fails to disclose the coordinate position included in the touch information as recited in amended claim 1. Further, Yang mentions nothing about the touch type included in the touch information as recited in amended claim 1.
Therefore, Yang fails to disclose the "touch information" as recited in amended claim 1, and consequently, Yang fails to disclose limitations related to the "touch information," such as the acquiring of the touch information (see the above distinguishing feature a) and the determination of the target position based on the screen rotation direction of the second device in the touch information (see the above distinguishing feature b).
Therefore, Yang does not disclose or suggest at least the above distinguishing features a and b of claim 1, and thus Yang fails to cure the deficiencies of Lee.
Based on the foregoing, it cannot be said that the applied references, whether taken individually or in combination, disclose the solution of claim 1, or render it obvious. Claim
1 is thus patentable over the applied references at least for the reasons discussed above.
Claims 8 and 22 have been amended in a similar manner as claim 1, and thus claims
8 and 22 are also in condition for allowance for similar reasons.
Claims 5 and 6 ultimately depend from claim 1, and claims 26 and 27 ultimately depend from claim 22, and thus Applicant respectfully submits the claims are in condition for allowance at least for the reason of dependence from an allowable claim.
Therefore, for at least the reasons set forth above, withdrawal of the rejection of claims 5, 6, 26, and 27 under 35 U.S.C. 103 is respectfully requested.
Conclusion

NEXT OFFICE ACTION: Notice of Pre-AIA  or AIA  Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Arguments
Arguments filed 7 March 2024 have been fully considered, but are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Lee fails to provide the newly claimed subject matter, particularly that the external device does not perform calculation of secondary coordinates, nor provide the ‘touch type’ within the data communicated between devices. The Office disagrees. First, [0067] discloses the ‘touch type’ (e.g., a capacitive change is detected to indicate a type of touch. Further, [0109], to which applicant quotes, goes on to say “the external display device 200 may apply the user input applied to the electronic device 100, to the screen 20 being output by that the display 210 by receiving and processing the second coordinate value”, which allows for the external device to receive and process the touch coordinates received from the first device – in order to allow touch operation to occur at the same location on the external device. Therefore, for the touch to be the same on both displayed GUIs, each would have to be proportional to the second devices’ screen. Additionally, claim 1 does not require the external device to perform the ‘conversion’, only that such information received is determined “according to” the information determined on the second device. As such, newly amend claims continue to be read on by the Lee disclosure.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA  35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA  35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA  to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1-4 7-10 21-25 and 28-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee (US 2019.0295498).
Regarding claim 1, Lee disclose:
A screen projection control method applied to a first device, the method comprising: acquiring touch information sent by a second device, wherein the touch information comprises a touch type, a coordinate position of a touch point on a screen of the second device, and a screen rotation direction of the second device, the screen of the second device and a screen of the first device display a same interface, wherein the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point, the proportional width coordinate of the touch point being a proportion of an actual width coordinate of the touch point to a width of the screen of the second device, the proportional height coordinate of the touch point being a proportion of an actual height coordinate of the touch point to a height of the screen of the second device, and wherein the touch information is determined based on a user inputting a touch operation corresponding to the touch type on the screen of the second device; and determining, according to the screen rotation direction of the second device, a target position on the screen of the first device corresponding to the coordinate position of the touch point, wherein the target position is a position for performing a touch operation corresponding to the touch type (see Fig. 3, 5, 9, 11; [0072, 0103, 0109, 0111-0128, 0133]; second device 100 to send touch information (type and coordinate of touch on 110) as well as orientation (rotation) of 100; where 100 and 200 show some interface; where based on touch information of 100 the target positions (e.g., desired input) is determined on 200; [0067] discloses the ‘touch type’ (e.g., a capacitive change is detected to indicate a type of touch. Further, [0109], to which applicant quotes, goes on to say “the external display device 200 may apply the user input applied to the electronic device 100, to the screen 20 being output by that the display 210 by receiving and processing the second coordinate value”, which allows for the external device to receive and process the touch coordinates received from the first device – in order to allow touch operation to occur at the same location on the external device. Therefore, for the touch to be the same on both displayed GUIs, each would have to be proportional to the second devices’ screen).
Regarding claim 2, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the determining, according to the screen rotation direction of the second device, the target position on the screen of the first device corresponding to the coordinate position of the touch point comprises: acquiring screen information of the first device; and performing, according to the screen information of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device, a conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point, to obtain the target position (see Fig. 3, 5, 9, 11; [0072, 0103, 0111-0128, 0133]).
Regarding claim 3, the rejection of claim 2 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the screen information of the first device comprises a screen rotation direction of the first device and size information of the screen of the first device, and the performing, according to the screen information of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device, the conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point, to obtain the target position comprises:  when it is determined that the screen rotation direction of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device are the same, performing, according to the size information of the screen of the first device, the conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point based on a first preset rule, to obtain the target position; and when it is determined that the screen rotation direction of the first device and the screen rotation direction of the second device are different, performing, according to the size information of the screen of the first device, the conversion on the coordinate position of the touch point based on a second preset rule, to obtain the target position (see Fig. 11; [0115, 0119, 0123, 0128, 0133])
Regarding claim 4, the rejection of claim 3 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point; the target position comprises a target width coordinate and a target height coordinate; the size information of the screen of the first device comprises a width and a height of the screen of the first device (see Fig. 11; [0105, 0115, 0119, 0123, 0128, 0133])
Regarding claim 7, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the touch information is generated based on a preset touch event transfer protocol (see Fig. 3, 5, 9, 11; [0072, 0103, 0111-0128, 0133]; where the ‘preset touch even transfer protocol’ is the touch information sent)
Regarding claim 8, Lee disclose:
A screen projection control method applied to a second device, the method comprising: generating, in response to a touch operation acting on a screen of the second device, corresponding touch information, wherein the touch information comprises a touch type, a coordinate position of a touch point corresponding to the touch operation on the screen of the second device, and a screen rotation direction of the second device, wherein the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point, the proportional width coordinate of the touch point being a proportion of an actual width coordinate of the touch point to a width of the screen of the second device, the proportional height coordinate of the touch point being a proportion of an actual height coordinate of the touch point to a height of the screen of the second device, and wherein the touch information is determined based on a user inputting a touch operation corresponding to the touch type on the screen of the second device; and sending the touch information to a first device, to enable the first device to determine, according to the screen rotation direction of the second device, a target position on a screen of the first device corresponding to the coordinate position of the touch point, wherein the target position is a position for performing a touch operation corresponding to the touch type (see Fig. 3, 5, 9, 11; [0072, 0103, 0109, 0111-0128, 0133]; second device 100 generates touch information (type and coordinate of touch on 110) as well as orientation (rotation) of 100 to send to first device 200; where 100 and 200 show some interface; where based on touch information of 100 the target positions (e.g., desired input) is determined on 200; [0067] discloses the ‘touch type’ (e.g., a capacitive change is detected to indicate a type of touch. Further, [0109], to which applicant quotes, goes on to say “the external display device 200 may apply the user input applied to the electronic device 100, to the screen 20 being output by that the display 210 by receiving and processing the second coordinate value”, which allows for the external device to receive and process the touch coordinates received from the first device – in order to allow touch operation to occur at the same location on the external device. Therefore, for the touch to be the same on both displayed GUIs, each would have to be proportional to the second devices’ screen).
Regarding claim 9, the rejection of claim 8 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the generating the corresponding touch information comprises: acquiring the touch type corresponding to the touch operation and the screen rotation direction of the second device; and generating, based on a preset touch event transfer protocol, the touch information according to the touch type, the coordinate position of the touch point and the screen rotation direction of the second device (see Fig. 3, 5, 9, 11; [0115, 0119, 0123, 0128, 0133]; where the ‘preset touch even transfer protocol’ is the touch information sent)
Regarding claim 10, the rejection of claim 8 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
wherein the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point, and the method further comprises: acquiring size information of the screen of the second device, wherein the size information of the screen of the second device comprises a width of the screen of the second device and a height of the screen of the second device; acquiring, for each touch point, an actual width coordinate and an actual height coordinate of the touch point, and acquiring a ratio of the actual width coordinate to the width of the screen of the second device and using the ratio as the proportional width coordinate of the touch point; and acquiring a ratio of the actual height coordinate to the height of the screen of the second device and using the ratio as the proportional height coordinate of the touch point (see Fig. 11; [0105, 0115, 0119, 0123, 0128, 0133])
Regarding claim 21, the rejection of claim 9 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
the coordinate position of the touch point comprises a proportional width coordinate and a proportional height coordinate of the touch point, and the method further comprises: acquiring size information of the screen of the second device, wherein the size information of the screen of the second device comprises a width of the screen of the second device and a height of the screen of the second device; acquiring, for each touch point, an actual width coordinate and an actual height coordinate of the touch point, and acquiring a ratio of the actual width coordinate to the width of the screen of the second device and using the ratio as the proportional width coordinate of the touch point; and acquiring a ratio of the actual height coordinate to the height of the screen of the second device and using the ratio as the proportional height coordinate of the touch point (see Fig. 11; [0105, 0115, 0119, 0123, 0128, 0133]).
Regarding claim 22, claim 22 is rejected under the same rationale as claim 1, where Lee further disclose:
at least one processor and a memory; wherein the memory has, stored therein, computer executable instructions; and the at least one processor performs the computer executable instructions stored in the memory, to enable the at least one processor (see [0037-0038])
Regarding claims 23-25 and 28. Claims 23-25 and 28 are rejected under the same rationale as claims 2-4 and 6, respectively.
Regarding claim 29, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
A non-transitory computer readable storage medium in which computer executable instructions are stored, wherein when a processor executes the computer executable instructions, the screen projection control method according to claim 1 (see [0037-0038])
Regarding claim 29, the rejection of claim 8 is incorporated herein. Lee further disclose:
A non-transitory computer readable storage medium in which computer executable instructions are stored, wherein when a processor executes the computer executable instructions, the screen projection control method according to claim 8 (see [0037-0038])
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA  35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA  35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA  to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
Claim(s) 5-6 and 26 -27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Yang (CN 108255398).
Regarding claim 5, the rejection of claim 4 is incorporated herein. While Lee is able to determine the target coordinates based on the landscape or portrait rotation of second device 100, it is not explicit as to, but Yang disclose:
the first preset rule is TX=Width*OX, TY=Height*OY, wherein TX is the target width coordinate, Width is the width of the screen of the first device, OX is the proportional width coordinate of the touch point, TY is the target height coordinate, Height is the height of the screen of the first device, and OY is the proportional height coordinate of the touch point (see pg. 5-6, where the dimensions of a smaller screen can be transformed to match the coordinates of the larger screen in proportion, thus would have been obvious to try by one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to applicant’s effective filing date, since there are a finite number of identified, predictable potential solutions (e.g., various equations to arrive at a proportional alignment of a target coordinates between displays) to be pursued by one of ordinary skill in the art with a reasonable expectation of success.).
Regarding claim 6, the rejection of claim 4 is incorporated herein. While Lee is able to determine the target coordinates based on the landscape or portrait rotation of second device 100, it is not explicit as to, but Yang disclose:
the second preset rule is TX=Width*OY, TY=Height*(1-OX), wherein TX is the target width coordinate, Width is the width of the screen of the first device, OY is the proportional height coordinate of the touch point, TY is the target height coordinate, Height is the height of the screen of the first device, and OX is the proportional width coordinate of the touch point (see pg. 5-6, where the dimensions of a smaller screen can be transformed to match the coordinates of the larger screen in proportion, thus would have been obvious to try by one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to applicant’s effective filing date, since there are a finite number of identified, predictable potential solutions (e.g., various equations to arrive at a proportional alignment of a target coordinates between displays) to be pursued by one of ordinary skill in the art with a reasonable expectation of success).
Regarding claims 26-27, claims 26-27 are rejected under the same rationale as claims 5-6, respectively.
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL.  Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.  In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action.  In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.

CITED REFERENCE SUMMARIES: Ref 20231201: [content unavailable]
Ref CN108255398: Claims:
A kind of 1. method for being used to perform at mobile equipment, which is characterized in that the method includes：
Receive the first usable screen size information from vehicle device；
Obtain the second screen size information of the mobile equipment；
It is determined according to the first usable screen size information and second screen size information for available vehicle device screen
First coordinate system and for the transformational relation between the second coordinate system of mobile device screen；
It receives from the vehicle device the first coordinate value associated with user's contact action；
Second coordinate value is determined according to first coordinate value and the transformational relation；And
Second coordinate value is input to the input subsystem of the mobile equipment.
2. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterized in that, between first coordinate system and second coordinate system
Conversion includes coordinate rotation and/or coordinate scaling.
3. according to the method described in claim 2, it is characterized in that, coordinate rotation includes：
The direction of vehicle device screen can be used according to determining the first usable screen size information；
The direction of vehicle device screen can be used whether consistent with the direction of the mobile device screen described in determining；
If described inconsistent with the direction of vehicle device screen and the direction of the mobile device screen, calculate described first and sit
Coordinate rotational value between mark system and second coordinate system.
4. according to the method described in claim 2, it is characterized in that, coordinate scaling includes：
First coordinate system and institute are calculated according to the first usable screen size information and second screen size information
State the scale value between the second coordinate system.
5. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterized in that, user's contact action include click, slide then from
Open it is described can use vehicle device screen, first coordinate value includes set of coordinate values, each coordinate value in the set of coordinate values
Corresponding to can be with vehicle device screen described in click when position coordinates and leave it is described can use vehicle device screen when position coordinates in
One.
6. method as claimed in any of claims 1 to 5, which is characterized in that the first usable screen size letter
Breath is the dimension information of vehicle device screen or the dimension information of the form on the vehicle device screen.
A kind of 7. method for the mobile equipment of vehicle device control, which is characterized in that the method includes：
The vehicle device is established with the mobile equipment and is interconnected；
The mobile equipment throws screen to the vehicle device；
The mobile equipment receives the first usable screen size information from the vehicle device；
The mobile equipment obtains the second screen size information of the mobile equipment；
The mobile equipment is determined according to the first usable screen size information and second screen size information for can
Transformational relation between the first coordinate system with vehicle device screen and the second coordinate system for mobile device screen；
The mobile equipment is received from the vehicle device the first coordinate value associated with user's contact action；
The mobile equipment determines the second coordinate value according to first coordinate value and the transformational relation；And
Second coordinate value is input to the input subsystem of the mobile equipment by the mobile equipment.
8. the method according to the description of claim 7 is characterized in that between first coordinate system and second coordinate system
Conversion includes coordinate rotation and/or coordinate scaling.
9. according to the method described in claim 8, it is characterized in that, coordinate rotation includes：
The mobile equipment can use the direction of vehicle device screen according to determining the first usable screen size information；
Whether the mobile equipment can use the direction of vehicle device screen consistent with the direction of the mobile device screen described in determining；
If described inconsistent with the direction of vehicle device screen and the direction of the mobile device screen, the mobile equipment meter
Calculate the coordinate rotational value between first coordinate system and second coordinate system.
10. according to the method described in claim 8, it is characterized in that, coordinate scaling includes：
The mobile equipment calculates described the according to the first usable screen size information and second screen size information
Scale value between one coordinate system and second coordinate system.
11. the method according to the description of claim 7 is characterized in that user's contact action include click, slide then from
Open it is described can use vehicle device screen, first coordinate value includes set of coordinate values, each coordinate value in the set of coordinate values
Corresponding to can be with vehicle device screen described in click when position coordinates and leave it is described can use vehicle device screen when position coordinates in
One.
12. the method according to any one in claim 7 to 11, which is characterized in that first usable screen size
Information is the dimension information of vehicle device screen or the dimension information of the form on the vehicle device screen.
13. a kind of mobile equipment, which is characterized in that the mobile equipment includes：
Receiver is configured to receive the first usable screen size information and associated with user's contact action first from vehicle device
Coordinate value；And
Processor is configured to：
Obtain the second screen size information of the mobile equipment；
It is determined according to the first usable screen size information and second screen size information for available vehicle device screen
First coordinate system and for the transformational relation between the second coordinate system of mobile device screen；
Second coordinate value is determined according to first coordinate value and the transformational relation；And
Second coordinate value is input to the input subsystem of the mobile equipment.
14. mobile equipment according to claim 13, which is characterized in that first coordinate system and second coordinate system
Between conversion include coordinate rotate and/or coordinate scaling.
15. mobile equipment according to claim 14, which is characterized in that the coordinate rotation includes：
The direction of vehicle device screen can be used according to determining the first usable screen size information；
The direction of vehicle device screen can be used whether consistent with the direction of the mobile device screen described in determining；
If described inconsistent with the direction of vehicle device screen and the direction of the mobile device screen, calculate described first and sit
Coordinate rotational value between mark system and second coordinate system.
16. mobile equipment according to claim 14, which is characterized in that the coordinate scaling includes：
First coordinate system and institute are calculated according to the first usable screen size information and second screen size information
State the scale value between the second coordinate system.
17. mobile equipment according to claim 13, which is characterized in that user's contact action includes clicking, slide
Be then departed from it is described can use vehicle device screen, first coordinate value includes set of coordinate values, each in the set of coordinate values
Coordinate value correspond to click described in position coordinates when can be with vehicle device screen and leaving described can use position during vehicle device screen to sit
One of mark.
18. the mobile equipment according to any one in claim 13 to 17, which is characterized in that the first available screen
Dimension information is the dimension information of vehicle device screen or the dimension information of the form on the vehicle device screen.
19. a kind of communication system, which is characterized in that the communication system includes：
Vehicle device and the mobile equipment with vehicle device interconnection；
The mobile equipment is configured to：
Screen is thrown to the vehicle device；
The first usable screen size information is received from the vehicle device；
Obtain the second screen size information of the mobile equipment；
It is determined according to the first usable screen size information and second screen size information for available vehicle device screen
First coordinate system and for the transformational relation between the second coordinate system of mobile device screen；
It receives from the vehicle device the first coordinate value associated with user's contact action；
Second coordinate value is determined according to first coordinate value and the transformational relation；And
Second coordinate value is input to the input subsystem of the mobile equipment.
20. communication system according to claim 19, which is characterized in that first coordinate system and second coordinate system
Between conversion include coordinate rotate and/or coordinate scaling.
21. communication system according to claim 20, which is characterized in that the coordinate rotation includes：
The mobile equipment can use the direction of vehicle device screen according to determining the first usable screen size information；
Whether the mobile equipment can use the direction of vehicle device screen consistent with the direction of the mobile device screen described in determining；
If described inconsistent with the direction of vehicle device screen and the direction of the mobile device screen, the mobile equipment meter
Calculate the coordinate rotational value between first coordinate system and second coordinate system.
22. communication system according to claim 20, which is characterized in that the coordinate scaling includes：
The mobile equipment calculates described the according to the first usable screen size information and second screen size information
Scale value between one coordinate system and second coordinate system.
23. communication system according to claim 19, which is characterized in that user's contact action includes clicking, slide
Be then departed from it is described can use vehicle device screen, first coordinate value includes set of coordinate values, each in the set of coordinate values
Coordinate value correspond to click described in position coordinates when can be with vehicle device screen and leaving described can use position during vehicle device screen to sit
One of mark.
24. the method according to any one in claim 19 to 23, which is characterized in that first usable screen size
Information is the dimension information of vehicle device screen or the dimension information of the form on the vehicle device screen.