Office Action 2: Final Rejection (2024-12-19)
Rejection types: 112 - Written Description/Enablement

CLAIMS:
Amendments to the Claims

This listing of claims replaces all prior versions and listings of claims in the application:

Listing of Claims:

1\. (Currently Amended) A handle trigger control apparatus, comprising a trigger bracket, wherein the handle trigger control apparatus further comprises:
a trigger (1) that is movably disposed on the trigger bracket and is provided thereon with a trigger magnet (3);
a bracket magnet (2) that is movable and can be fixedly provided on the trigger bracket; and
a control device configured to control the bracket magnet (2) to approach or go away from the trigger magnet (3) to adjust an action distance between the trigger magnet (3) and the bracket magnet (2),
wherein the bracket magnet (2) is directly opposite to the trigger magnet (3), so that a facing area of the bracket magnet (2) and the trigger magnet (3) remains unchanged when the control device controls the bracket magnet (2) to approach or go away from the trigger magnet (3).

2\. (Cancelled).
3\. (Currently Amended) The handle trigger control apparatus according to claim \[\[2\]\], wherein magnetic poles of opposite sides of the bracket magnet (2) and the trigger magnet (3) are same, and the bracket magnet (2) is located in a moving direction of pressing the trigger magnet (3).SVG {EMBED HERE} 0.1370.08

4\. (Original) The handle trigger control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the trigger (1) is provided thereon with a groove, and the trigger magnet (3) is disposed in the groove.

5\. (Original) The handle trigger control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the trigger (1) is connected with the trigger bracket via an elastic member, and the elastic

member is configured to drive the trigger in the pressed state to return its Original position.

6\. (Original) The handle trigger control apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the elastic member is a position restoring spring, one end of the position restoring spring is connected with the trigger bracket, and the other end of the position restoring spring is connected with the trigger.

7\. (Original) The handle trigger control apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the trigger (1) is hinged to the trigger bracket via a hinge shaft.

8\. (Original) The handle trigger control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein an area of the trigger magnet (3) is same as that of the bracket magnet (1).

9\. (Original) The handle trigger control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the control device is provided with a signal receiving device configured to receive an adjustment command for the bracket magnet (2); or the control device is preset with an adjustment command for the bracket magnet (2) in advance.

10\. (Currently Amended) A handle comprising a handle trigger control apparatus according to claim 1.

11\. (Cancelled).

12\. (Currently Amended) The handle according to claim 10 \[\[11\]\], wherein magnetic poles of opposite sides of the bracket magnet (2) and the trigger magnet (3) are same, and the bracket magnet (2) is located in a moving direction of pressing the trigger magnet (3).

13\. (Previously Presented) The handle according to claim 10, wherein the trigger (1) is provided thereon with a groove, and the trigger magnet (3) is disposed in the groove.

14\. (Previously Presented) The handle according to claim 10, wherein the trigger (1) is connected with the trigger bracket via an elastic member, and the elastic member is configured to drive the trigger in the pressed state to return its Original position.

15\. (Previously Presented) The handle according to claim 14, wherein the elastic member is a position restoring spring, one end of the position restoring spring is connected with the trigger bracket, and the other end of the position restoring spring is connected with the trigger.

16\. (Previously Presented) The handle according to claim 14, wherein the trigger (1) is hinged to the trigger bracket via a hinge shaft.

17\. (Previously Presented) The handle according to claim 10, wherein an area of the trigger magnet (3) is same as that of the bracket magnet (1).

18\. (Previously Presented) The handle according to claim 10, wherein the control device is provided with a signal receiving device configured to receive an adjustment command for the bracket magnet (2); or the control device is preset with an adjustment command for the bracket magnet (2) in advance.

OFFICE ACTION:
DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA  or AIA  Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Applicant’s amendments dated 12/10/24 are hereby entered.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b)  CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 1, 3-10, and 11-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA  35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
Claim 1 is directed to an apparatus (a “handle trigger”) and a method step of employing that apparatus (“so that a facing area of the bracket magnet (2) and the trigger magnet (3) remains unchanged when the control device controls the bracket magnet (2) to approach or go away from the trigger magnet (3)”, emphasis added) and is thereby indefinite.  See MPEP 2173.05(p)(II).
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments are addressed by the updated statement of rejection made supra under 35 USC 112, which was necessitated by Applicant’s amendments.
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL.  Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.  In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action.  In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.

APPLICANT REBUTTAL: REMARKS
I
Claim Status
Claims 1-18 are pending in the present Application but stand rejected. By this paper, claims 1, 3, 10, and 12 have been amended, claims 2 and 11 have been canceled, and no new claims have been added. Accordingly, claims 1, 3-10, and 12-18 remain pending and under consideration. Favorable reconsideration is respectfully requested in view of the amendments presented above and the arguments presented below.
II.    Summary
The Examiner considers that claims 1-18 allegedly do not possess novelty or non- obviousness compared with reference documents, and that claims 2, 10, 11 allegedly are not clear.
III.  Amendments
1. Technical feature of claim 2 is added to independent claim 1; that is, claims 1 and
2 have now been combined as a new independent claim 1.
2. Informalities in claims 2 and 10 are amended.
IV.   Arguments
According to "the bracket magnet 2 is disposed directly opposite to the trigger magnet 3 in the fully pressed state, and a facing area of the bracket magnet 2 and the trigger magnet 3 that is in a fully pressed state remains unchanged when the control device controls the bracket magnet 2 to approach or go away from the trigger magnet 3. Please refer to FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, the trigger 1 has been pressed from the state of FIG. 1 to the position of FIG. 2 or FIG. 3. At this moment, the bracket magnet 2 and the trigger magnet 3 are directly opposite to each other. FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the bracket magnet at a position close to the trigger magnet, and FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the bracket magnet at a position far away from the trigger magnet. It can be seen that in FIGS. 2 and 3, the bracket magnet 2 is located relatively close to and far away from the trigger magnet 3, and the two magnets are in a directly opposite state, that is, in a parallel
and non-misaligned state, in both cases" in paragraph 0048-0049 of the publication specification, and referring to FIG. 2 and 3, it is configured that a facing area of the bracket magnet 2 and the trigger magnet 3 remains unchanged when the bracket magnet
2 approaches or goes away from the trigger magnet 3. Therefore, technical feature of "the bracket magnet (2) is directly opposite to the trigger magnet (3) that is in a fully pressed state, and a facing area of the bracket magnet (2) and the trigger magnet (3) that is in the fully pressed state remains unchanged when the control device controls the bracket magnet (2) to approach or go away from the trigger magnet (3)" in claim 2 is amended to "the bracket magnet (2) is directly opposite to the trigger magnet (3), so that a facing area of the bracket magnet (2) and the trigger magnet (3) remains unchanged when the control device controls the bracket magnet (2) to approach or go away from the trigger magnet
(3)". The amended claims 2 and 11 describe the configuration of the bracket magnet 2 and trigger magnet 3, rather than the method steps.
In addition, "a handle comprises" in claim 10 is amended to correct "a handle comprising".
Regarding the novelty and non-obviousness of the amended claims of the present application, the following arguments are provided.
The main technical features of the amended independent claim 1 are: comprising a trigger bracket, wherein the handle trigger control apparatus further comprises: a trigger
(1) that is movably disposed on the trigger bracket and is provided thereon with a trigger magnet (3); a bracket magnet (2) that is movable and can be fixedly provided on the trigger bracket; and a control device configured to control the bracket magnet (2) to approach or go away from the trigger magnet (3) to adjust an action distance between the trigger magnet (3) and the bracket magnet (2), wherein the bracket magnet (2) is directly opposite to the trigger magnet (3), so that a facing area of the bracket magnet (2) and the trigger magnet (3) remains unchanged when the control device controls the bracket magnet (2) to approach or go away from the trigger magnet (3).
Thus, as described in paragraph 0050 of the specification, the present application achieves the following technical effects: the function of keeping the facing area unchanged is to make the change of the force between the two magnets completely determined by the distance between them, not affected by the angle and the corresponding area. It can be seen from the distribution of magnetic induction line around the magnet, within a certain range, the closer the distance is, the greater the action force is, and the farther the distance is, the smaller the action force is. Thus, the technical effect of "it can change the distance between the two magnets based on different game environments and game settings, so that users can experience different tactile shocks when pulling the trigger, and experience higher-level fun brought by the game during the change of trigger feedback force" (paragraph 0024 of the specification) is achieved more stably.
In Billington, a haptic peripheral is provided, whose main technical feature is "The magnetic actuator includes a first programmable magnet attached to the user input element and a second programmable magnet disposed within the housing. The first and second programmable magnets each have a pre-programmed pattern of magnetic elements that interact to output haptic effects to the user input element. The pre- programmed pattern of magnetic elements of the second programmable magnet is movable relative to the pre-programmed pattern of magnetic elements of the first programmable magnet such that when the second programmable magnet is in a first configuration, a first haptic effect is output to the user input element and when the second programmable magnet is in a second configuration, a second haptic effect is output to the user input element, the first and second haptic effects being different from each other" (paragraph 0007 of its specification).
However, by comparing Billington with the present application, the following differences can be found.
(1) In Billington, for example, in paragraphs 0049 and 0052 of its public
specification, it is described that "First programmable magnet 1132 has a triangular cross-section defining a base side or surface 1154, as well as two opposing angular
surfaces 1152, 1156. As trigger 118 is operated, first programmable magnet 1132 rotates or pivots around a pivot point 1150, which is formed between opposing angular surfaces 1152, 1156 thereof, as indicated by directional arrow 1158 shown on FIG. 11", "In order to vary or change the haptic effects output by magnetic actuator 120, second programmable magnet 1138 is spun, rotated, or otherwise moved by motor 1140 to change the orientation of the pre-programmed pattern thereof', that is, the first programmable magnet 1132 and the second programmable magnet 1138 perform rotation actions. Furthermore, in Billington, no other specific implementations are disclosed. In other words, as mentioned above, in order to achieve "the first and second haptic effects being different from each other", it is necessary to rotate at least one of the first programmable magnet 1132 and the second programmable magnet 1138. However, when at least one of the first programmable magnet 1132 and the second programmable magnet 1138 rotates relative to the other, their facing areas will inevitably change, meaning that their facing areas will not remain unchanged. This is different from the above-mentioned "the bracket magnet 2 is located relatively close to and far away from the trigger magnet 3, and the two magnets are in a directly opposite state, that is, in a parallel and non- misaligned state, in both cases" in the present application. Therefore, Billington does not disclose the technical feature of "the bracket magnet (2) is directly opposite to the trigger magnet (3), so that a facing area of the bracket magnet (2) and the trigger magnet (3) remains unchanged when the control device controls the bracket magnet (2) to approach or go away from the trigger magnet (3)" in the amended independent claim 1 of the present application.
Furthermore, it is pointed out in the Office Action that "In regard to Claim 2,
Billington teaches these limitations. See e.g., F12". However, for example, in paragraph 0051 of Billington's specification, it is described that "When a downward force is applied to trigger 118 as indicated by directional arrow 1346 on FIG. 13, trigger 118 and first programmable magnet 1132 attached thereto rotate or pivot around pivot point 1150 until angular surface 1152 of first programmable magnet 1132 faces or is adjacent to second programmable magnet 1138 as shown in FIG. 13", and Referring to FIG. 12 and 13, FIG.
12 shows the initial state of the first programmable magnet 1132 before rotation. Then, in FIG. 13, the first programmable magnet 1132 rotates around the pivot point 1150, thereby achieving "the first and second haptic effects being different from each other" described above. Furthermore, as mentioned above, "second programmable magnet 1138 is spun, rotated, or otherwise moved by motor 1140 to change the orientation of the pre- programmed pattern thereof', meaning that the second programmable magnet 1138 can also rotate. In summary, in Billington, in order to achieve different haptic effects, at least one of the first programmable magnet 1132 and the second programmable magnet 1138 is rotated, and after rotation, the facing areas of the first programmable magnet 1132 and the second programmable magnet 1138 (1154 and 1138 are the facing areas) will inevitably change. This is completely different from "It can be seen that in FIGS. 2 and 3, the bracket magnet 2 is located relatively close to and far away from the trigger magnet 3, and the two magnets are in a directly opposite state, that is, in a parallel and non- misaligned state, in both cases" (paragraph 0049 of the specification) in the present application.
(2) As described above, in the present application, "making the change of the force between the two magnets completely determined by the distance between them, not affected by the angle and the corresponding area" is realized by the technical feature of "the bracket magnet (2) is directly opposite to the trigger magnet (3), so that a facing area of the bracket magnet (2) and the trigger magnet (3) remains unchanged when the control device controls the bracket magnet (2) to approach or go away from the trigger magnet
(3)", thereby achieving the above technical effects of the present application more stably.
However, for example, in paragraph 0053 of Billington's specification, it is described that "in the nominal configuration of first and second programmable magnets 1132, 1138, the haptic effects output by magnetic actuator 120 include a programmed resistive force on trigger 118 as well as a programmed spring force of trigger 118. In order to vary or change the haptic effects output by magnetic actuator 120, second programmable magnet 1138 is spun, rotated, or otherwise moved by motor 1140 to change the orientation of the pre-programmed pattern thereof. The re-oriented pattern of second
programmable magnet 1138 changes the interaction between first and second programmable magnets 1132, 1138 and thereby results in different haptic effects being output to the user input device as described above with respect to first and second programmable magnets 432, 438, respectively". That is, different haptic effects are output by rotating (changing direction of) the first programmable magnet 432 relative to the second programmable magnet 438. This is opposite to the technical effect described above in the present application. That is to say, the technical effect of Billington is completely different from that of the present application.
In summary, the reference document does not disclose the special technical features and effects of the amended independent claim 1 of the present application, therefore the amended independent claim 1 of the present application possesses novelty and non- obviousness compared to the reference document. In addition, the dependent claims referring from the independent claim 1, 12, as well as corresponding claim 12, also possess novelty and non-obviousness.
CONCLUSION

NEXT OFFICE ACTION: DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA  or AIA  Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Applicant’s amendments dated 2/19/25 are hereby entered.
Claims 1, 3-10, and 12-18 are allowed.
Conclusion