Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements
Authors: Ashley L Juavinett
Steven Gluf
Matthew T Kaufman
Simon Musall
Anne K Churchland
Journal: Nature neuroscience (2019)
Discipline: NEUROSCIENCE & BEHAVIOR
Keywords: neural activity; movements; task-related; cognitive computations; widefield imaging
Affiliations: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Neuroscience, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA., Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA., The Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology and Human Behavior, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA., Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Neuroscience, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA. .

Abstract:  When experts are immersed in a task, do their brains prioritize task-related activity? Most efforts to understand neural activity during well-learned tasks focus on cognitive computations and task-related movements. We wondered whether task-performing animals explore a broader movement landscape and how this impacts neural activity. We characterized movements using video and other sensors and measured neural activity using widefield and two-photon imaging. Cortex-wide activity was dominated by movements, especially uninstructed movements not required for the task. Some uninstructed movements were aligned to trial events. Accounting for them revealed that neurons with similar trial-averaged activity often reflected utterly different combinations of cognitive and movement variables. Other movements occurred idiosyncratically, accounting for trial-by-trial fluctuations that are often considered 'noise'. This held true throughout task-learning and for extracellular Neuropixels recordings that included subcortical areas. Our observations argue that animals execute expert decisions while performing richly varied, uninstructed movements that profoundly shape neural activity. 

Retracted: No

PubPeer comments:
 In this study, lice were collected from diverse groups of people, including homeless persons in Marseille, for genotyping. I have a question about the IRB approval for this study, since homeless persons might be considered to be a  vulnerable population (i.e., vulnerable to coercion), similar to veterans or prisoners in the US, although IRB rules might differ per country. Surprisingly, the IRB approval number listed in this paper (2010-A01406-33) is used for at least 17 studies, including this one. Although all of them involve homeless persons recruited from Marseille shelters, the studies themselves vary in terms of study protocols and treatment sample collection. The studies vary from collecting lice, treating subjects with drug-impregnated underwear, filling out questionnaires, medical exams, to nasal and pharyngeal sampling, skin swabbing, blood draw, rectal samples, sputum collection, and chest X rays. Moreover, the studies were performed from 2011 to 2020, spanning almost 10 years. Would the authors be willing to share the original 2010 ethical approval application here? Did they get approval for all these different studies spanning 10 years, in one single application? There is also confusion about which institution or ethical board approved the study. Some papers state that the study was approved by  our institutional review board , suggesting that this was a number referring to IRB approval by the Aix-Marseille Universitu00e9 and or Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Mu00e9diterranu00e9e Infection, both listed as author affiliations. But in other papers, the IRB approval number appears to be an ANSM RCB authorization ID, as per  Informed consent was obtained from these subjects, and the study was approved by the u2018u2018Comitu00e9 de Protection des Personnes Sud Mediterranu00e9eu2019u2019 on January, 12, 2011 (ID RCB: 2010-A01406-33) , e.g. as mentioned in PLoS ONE 8(2): e58088. Either way, it would be of interest to take away any concern whether studies on this vulnerable populations were all performed within the original IRB approval scope. Here is the list of 17 papers that all appear to share the same ethical approval number: * Rezak Drali et al. - Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2012) p. 2229u20132233 - DOI: 10.1128 JCM.00808-12 * Rezak Drali et al. - PLoS ONE 8(2): e58088 (2013) - DOI: 10.1371 journal.pone.0058088 * Samir Benkouiten et al. - JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(3):273-279 (2014) - DOI: 10.1001 jamadermatol.2013.6398 * Rezak Drali et al - Infection, Genetics and Evolution 39 (2016) 225u2013231 - DOI: 10.1016 j.meegid.2016.02.008 * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - Emerging Infectious Diseases (2017) - DOI: 10.3201 eid2311.170516 * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - Clinical Microbiology and Infection 25 (2019) 249.e1e249.e6 - DOI: 10.1016 j.cmi.2018.04.032 * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 9:86 (2019) - DOI: 10.3389 fcimb.2019.00086 * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health (2019) - DOI: 10.2991 jegh.k.190510.001 * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - Infection and Drug Resistance 2019:12 1139u20131151 - DOI: 10.2147 IDR.S202048 * Nadia Amanzougaghene et al. - Parasites Vectors (2020) 13:177 - DOI: 10.1186 s13071-020-04036-y * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Infectious Diseases (2020) - DOI: 10.1007 s10096-020-03889-6 * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 36 (2020) 101768 - DOI: 10.1016 j.tmaid.2020.101768 * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases (2020) - DOI: 10.1089 vbz.2019.2603 * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - Acta Microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica (2021) - DOI: 10.1556 030.2021.01346 * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health (2021) - DOI: 10.2991 jegh.k.201009.001 * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - Journal of Infection Volume 82, Issue 1, January 2021, Pages 60-66 - DOI: 10.1016 j.jinf.2020.11.026 * Tran Duc Anh Ly et al. - European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Infectious Diseases (2021) - DOI: 10.1007 s10096-020-04127-9 ,