MicroRNA-495 Inhibits Gastric Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion Possibly via Targeting High Mobility Group AT-Hook 2 (HMGA2)
Authors: Jun Xiang
Honglei Chen
Huashe Wang
Zhipeng Jiang
Xiaobin Wu
Junsheng Peng
Journal: Medical Science Monitor (2017)
Discipline: CLINICAL MEDICINE
Keywords: Gastric cancer; miR-495; HMGA2; cell migration; invasion
Affiliations: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland)., Department of Digestive Endoscopic Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).

Abstract:  BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies, and has a high mortality rate. miR-495 acts as a suppressor in some cancers and HMGA2 (high mobility group AT-hook 2) is a facilitator for cell growth and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), but little is known about their effect in gastric cancer. This study aimed to investigate the role and mechanism of miR-495 in gastric cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS miR-495 levels were quantitatively analyzed in gastric cancer tissue and GES-1, SGC-7901, BGC-823, and HGC-27 cell lines by qRT-PCR. Levels of miR-495 and HMGA2 were altered by cell transfection, after which cell migration and invasion were examined by Transwell and E-cadherin (CDH1); vimentin (VIM), and alpha smooth muscle actin (ACTA2) were detected by qRT-PCR and Western blotting. The interaction between miR-495 and HMGA2 was verified by dual-luciferase reporter assay. RESULTS miR-495 was significantly downregulated in cancer tissue and cell lines (p&lt;0.05). Its overexpression inhibited cell migration and invasion, elevated CDH1, and inhibited VIM and ACTA2 levels in BGC-823 and HGC-27 cells. miR-495 directly inhibited HMGA2, which was upregulated in gastric cancer tissue, and promoted cell migration and invasion, inhibited CDH1, and elevated VIM and ACTA2. CONCLUSIONS miR-495 acts as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer by inhibiting cell migration and invasion, which may be associated with its direct inhibition on HMGA2. These results suggest a promising therapeutic strategy for gastric cancer treatment. 

Retracted: Yes

PubPeer comments:
 Increasing the contrast of the Western Blots reveals a recurring background texture, repeated across bands. This, plus the stylised appearance of the blots, raises the possibility that they are the work of the  tadpole papermill . If I may [steal a comment from Elisabeth Bik] : ---------------------------------------- This paper belongs to a set of over 400 papers (as per February 2020) that share very similar Western blots with tadpole-like shaped bands, the same background pattern, and striking similarities in title structures, paper layout, bar graph design, and - in a subset - flow cytometry panels. Despite these similarities, these papers are authored by researchers from different departments and institutes, with almost no overlap in authors. The list of these papers is available here: https: docs.google.com spreadsheets d 1KXqTAyl4j-jVorFPMD2XRpr76LcIKJ0CVyIvRj0exYQ edit?usp=sharing A more detailed description of this set of papers, suspected to all be generated by a common source, a paper mill , can be found here: - https: forbetterscience.com 2020 01 24 the-full-service-paper-mill-and-its-chinese-customers (January 2020) - https: scienceintegritydigest.com 2020 02 21 the-tadpole-paper-mill (February 2020) The same paper mill has been described in these papers: - Jana Christopher - Systematic fabrication of scientific images revealed - FEBS Letters (2018) - https: febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com doi full 10.1002 1873-3468.13201 - Jennifer A Byrne and Jana Christopher - Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st centuryu2014how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? - FEBS Letters (2020) - https: febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com doi full 10.1002 1873-3468.13747 , 
 Retracted [14 December 2021] .  This publication has been retracted by the Editor due to the identification of non-original figure images and manuscript content that raise concerns regarding the credibility and originality of the study and the manuscript. ,