MicroRNA-375 targets PAX6 and inhibits the viability, migration and invasion of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells
Authors: Fenfen Fu
Dewu Zhong
Jianghai Huang
Qiongyan Zou
Wenjun Yi
Gannong Chen
Journal: Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine (2017)
Discipline: CLINICAL MEDICINE
Keywords: breast cancer; invasion; microRNA-375; migration; paired box 6
Affiliations: Department of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, P.R. China.

Abstract:  MicroRNAs (miRs) are a type of small non-coding RNA that serve crucial roles in the development and progression of breast cancer. However, the exact role and underlying molecular mechanism of miR-375 in mediating the growth and metastasis of breast cancer remains unknown. In the present study, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis were conducted to examine RNA and protein expression. A luciferase reporter assay was performed to determine the association between miR-375 and paired box 6 (PAX6). The results of the current study indicate that the expression of miR-375 was reduced in breast cancer tissues compared with matched adjacent normal tissues. Transfection with miR-375 mimics led to a significant increase in levels of miR-375 in human breast cancer Michigan Cancer Foundation (MCF)-7 cells (P&lt;0.05). The increase in miR-375 expression caused a significant decrease in the viability, migration and invasion of MCF-7 cells (P&lt;0.05), accompanied by a reduced expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 and MMP9 proteins. Luciferase reporter assay identified PAX6 as a novel target of miR-375 and miR-375 in turn, negatively regulated the protein expression of PAX6 in MCF-7 cells. By contrast, overexpression of PAX6 led to a significant increase in MCF-7 cell viability (P&lt;0.01) but did not affect the migration and invasion of MCF-7 cells, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of miR-375 on MCF-7 cell viability may be occurring, in part, via the direct targeting of PAX6. 

Retracted: Yes

PubPeer comments:
 Figs 3B, 7B. Transwell assays. ![file] I set up a spreadsheet to include the various papers using this versatile suite of Transwell images to represent all possible combinations of cell-lines and treatments. This is the 37th manifestation. For comparison: Fig 3 C D from [Zhang et al (2016)] .  Transwell assay were performed to examine the migratory and invasive capacities of Saos-2 and U2OS cells transfected with miR-205 mimic or miR-negative control (NC) mimic , and Fig 7C D,  Transwell assay were performed to examine cell migration and invasion of MG63 or U2OS cells transfected with miR-205 mimic, or co-transfected with miR-205 mimic and RUNX2 plasmid . ![] Figs 4D, 6D from [Xia et al (2016)] . ![] Also *[above]* Fig 4C from [Lai, Chen Li (2015)] .  a Transwell assay were performed to examine the cell proliferation of AGS cells transfected with miR-133a mimics, miR-133a inhibitor, or co-transfected with miR-133a mimics and FSCN1 plasmid. Control: AGS cells without any transfection. *[below]* Figs 3(B), 6(B) from [Shi et al (2015)] .  Transwell assay was performed to determine the invasive capacity of the Saos-2 and U-2 OS cells transfected with NC scramble miRNA or miR-204 mimics, respectively. Control, Saos-2 and U-2 OS cells without any transfection ...  Transwell assay was performed to determine the invasive capacity of the Saos-2 and U-2 OS cells transfected with Sirt1 siRNA or co-transfected with miR-204 mimics and the Sirt1 plasmid, respectively. Control, Saos-2 and U-2 OS cells without any transfection . ![file] , 
 Retracted [12 August 2021] . ---------------------------- Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editorsu2019 attention by a concerned reader that the Transwell cell migration assay data shown in Figs. 3B and 7B were strikingly similar to data appearing in different form in other articles by different authors. Owing to the fact that the contentious data in the above article had already been published elsewhere, or were already under consideration for publication, prior to its submission to *Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine*, the Editor has decided that this paper should be retracted from the Journal. The authors were asked for an explanation to account for these concerns, but the Editorial Office did not receive any reply. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused ,