Using medical comics to explore challenging everyday topics in medicine: lessons learned from teaching medical humanities
Authors: Gerhard Zlabinger
Anna Kitta
Andrea Praschinger
Herbert Hans Watzke
Eva Katharina Masel
Philipp Pavelka
Matthias Unseld
Feroniki Adamidis
Andreas Gruebl
Journal: Annals of palliative medicine (2020)
Discipline: CLINICAL MEDICINE
Keywords: Art; education; humanities; medicine; students
Affiliations: Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Palliative Care, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. ., Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Palliative Care, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Teaching Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Abstract:  Background: Studying medicine requires an extensive acquisition of knowledge, skills and attitudes. At the MedUni Vienna, this wide range of skills is strengthened by discussing aspects of medical humanities (MH) with medical students in their pre-clinical fifth study year. Medical comics (MCs), as a part of MH, offer the possibility to address challenging situations within medical settings through the use of graphic illustrations. Thus, patient stories as well as different perspectives of patients, caregivers, and medical staff can be addressed. Methods: A total of 506 medical students were randomly assigned to one of three MCs within a blended learning setting via the Moodle online learning platform. The medical students were instructed to reflect on the MC by answering three questions within one week. Depending on the MC assigned, the learning objectives were to (I) comprehend demands on a young doctor during a night shift, (II) reflect on a patient examination situation, or (III) recognize patients' physical and/or emotional needs. The word counts of the answers and the time spent online answering the questions in the learning platform were analyzed. This was followed by an analysis in which the answers and their content were rated on a three-point Likert scale (insufficient, sufficient, exceptional). Subsequently, an MH and MCs lecture was held that incorporated the medical students' reflections. After the lecture, a one-minute paper (OMP) survey comprising two questions was conducted on the learning platform. Results: Of the 506 medical students assigned the online task, 505 completed it. On average, each medical student wrote 110.87 words (SD: 78.54; range, 4.00-602.00) and spent 12.75 minutes (SD: 11.60) on the task. Of all the answers, 84% were rated as sufficient or exceptional. Two OMP questions: (I) "What was the most important thing you learned today?", and (II) "What questions remain unanswered?" were answered by the medical students. "What was the most important thing you learned today?" was answered by 78% (n=393) of the medical students with a profound statement. When asked "What questions remain unanswered?", 85% (n=429) of the medical students stated that nothing was left unanswered. All the answers included 154 positive and 28 negative comments on the lecture. Conclusions: The study results indicate that medical students saw great potential in the use of MCs in medical teaching in terms of addressing challenging topics and reflecting on them deeply. This kind of blended learning (a form of learning in which the advantages of face-to-face events and e-learning are combined) successfully showed that medical students can gain a deeper understanding of MH and be inspired through the use of MCs. 

Retracted: No

PubPeer comments:
 Figure 2. In the top row, two panels look more similar to each other than expected. I have marked several areas that look similar to each other with boxes of the same color. ![file] ,