Retracted : LncRNA AWPPH inhibits SMAD4 via EZH2 to regulate bladder cancer progression
Authors: Fengxia Diao
Yan Zhang
Qinnan Yu
Xinjun Zhang
Guangye Han
Feng Zhu
Chunlei Wu
Journal: Journal of Cellular Biochemistry (2018)
Discipline: MOLECULAR BIOLOGY & GENETICS
Keywords: EZH2; SMAD4; bladder cancer; cell proliferation and migration; lncRNA AWPPH.
Affiliations: Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, Henan, China., Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.

Abstract:  This study aimed to investigate the effect and underlying mechanism of lncRNA AWPPH in bladder cancer (BC). A total of 20 Ta-T1 stage BC tissues, 20 T2-T4 stage BC tissues, and 20 normal bladder tissues, as well as human bladder epithelial cell line SV-HUC-1, human BC cell lines RT4, and T24 were obtained to detect the levels of AWPPH, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) and SMAD4 using RT-qPCR or Western blotting. RT4 cells were transfected with pc-AWPPH, pc-EZH2, or pc-control and T24 cells were transfected with si-AWPPH, si-EZH2, si-control, or pc-AWPPH + pc-SMAD4, respectively. Then, cell proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, and migration, were detected using MTT assay, colony formation assay, Annexin V-FITC/PI method, Western blotting, and Transwell analysis, respectively. The relationship of AWPPH and EZH2 or SMAD4 was evaluated by RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay or Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. Compared with normal bladder tissues or cells, the levels of AWPPH and EZH2 were overexpressed, while SMAD4 was down-regulated in BC tissues or cells (all P &lt; 0.01). Cell viability, colony number, and migration were significantly increased, while cell apoptosis ratio was reduced in cells with pc-AWPPH compared with cells with pc-control (all P &lt; 0.05), meanwhile, these effects were reversed by the treatment of pc-SMAD4. Then, RIP assay revealed that AWPPH could bind to EZH2 and ChIP assay showed SMAD4 was regulated by EZH2. LncRNA AWPPH can promote cell proliferation, autophagy, and migration, as well as inhibit cell apoptosis in BC by inhibiting SMAD4 via EZH2. 

Retracted: Yes

PubPeer comments:
 ![file] Plagiarising [a comment by Elisabeth Bik] : This paper belongs to a set of over 400 papers (as per February 2020) that share very similar Western blots with tadpole-like shaped bands, the same background pattern, and striking similarities in title structures, paper layout, bar graph design, and - in a subset - flow cytometry panels. Despite these similarities, these papers are authored by researchers from different departments and institutes, with almost no overlap in authors. The list of these papers is available here: https: docs.google.com spreadsheets d 1KXqTAyl4j-jVorFPMD2XRpr76LcIKJ0CVyIvRj0exYQ edit?usp=sharing A more detailed description of this set of papers, suspected to all be generated by a common source, a paper mill , can be found here: - https: forbetterscience.com 2020 01 24 the-full-service-paper-mill-and-its-chinese-customers (January 2020) - https: scienceintegritydigest.com 2020 02 21 the-tadpole-paper-mill (February 2020) The same paper mill has been described in these papers: - Jana Christopher - Systematic fabrication of scientific images revealed - FEBS Letters (2018) - https: febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com doi full 10.1002 1873-3468.13201 - Jennifer A Byrne and Jana Christopher - Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st centuryu2014how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? - FEBS Letters (2020) - https: febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com doi full 10.1002 1873-3468.13747 , 
 Retracted [9 June 2021] . ----------------- The above article, published online on 12 December 2017 in Wiley Online Library , has been retracted by agreement between the the journal s Editor in Chief, Prof. Dr. Christian Behl, and Wiley Periodicals LLC. The retraction has been agreed following an investigation based on allegations raised by a third party. Several flaws and inconsistencies between results presented and experimental methods described were found, the editors consider the conclusions of this article to be invalid. The authors collaborated in the investigation initially, but were not available for a final confirmation of the retraction. ,