[ {"created_timestamp": "02-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5230", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Benjamin Rush, 18 February 1808\nFrom: Rush, Benjamin\nTo: Adams, John\nMy venerable & dear friend\nPhiladelphia Feb: 18th 1808\nI have escaped for ten minutes from the pressure of business, lectures\u2013pupils, and the Charge of the Pennsylvania hospital, to drop you a few lines which I beg you will consider as the preface only of a longer letter a few Weeks hence, when I shall be relieved from three fourths of my present labors.\nOur Citizens are making great preparations for celebrating the birth day of the first President of the United States. Is this not a Unique in the history of nations\u2013thus to perpetuate the memories of their benefactors and deliverers? I exclude from this Question the homage that has been paid by all nations to the birth day of the Saviour of the World. By such Acts we Shall gradually be prepared for much higher degrees of devotion to the name of our great man. What do you think of hearing the Clerk minister of your Church seven years hence begin public worship by saying \u201cLet us sing to the praise & glory of Geo:\u201d?\nGreat Clamors are every where excited against the embargo. How different were the feelings and Conduct of our Citizens in 1774 upon the Subject of the more oppresive non importation Act of that memorable year! The Clamors against the embargo originate in our Cities, and chiefly among one Class of Citizens. \u201cAnd he causeth all, both small & great, rich and poor, bond & free to recieve a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads and that no man might buy or sell, save he had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the Number of his name.\u201d It is easy to tell who are the persons alluded to that have received this mark, as also the nature of the impression made by it upon the hand, or upon the forehead (Dollars. an eagle and the figure of liberty.), but who is the beast that has imposed this mark upon the buyers and Sellers of our Country? Is it Napolion?\u2014or is three the number of his name\u2013that is George the third? or is it by the the Lord and master of them both, Lucifer the first?\u2014\nWhat monuments of ignorance, folly & pride will Congress leave behind them, Should they finally escape from the City of Washington?!\u2014\nWith Affectionate regard to Mrs Adams in which my Dear Mrs Rush joins I am Dear sir your / sincere & obliged friend\nBenj\u2019n Rush", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5231", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 25 February 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Rush, Benjamin\nMy dear Philosopher\nQuincy Feb. 25 1808\nYour two last Letters have puzzled me. In one you tell me that your Citizens are clamorous against the Residence of Congress at Washington. Now Washington was the Father of the Columbian Territory, the City of Washington and the Residence of Congress in it: and Washington Jefferson and L\u2019Enfant were the Triumvirate who planned the City the Capitol and the Prince\u2019s Palace. In your last Feb. 18 you tell me, that your Citizens are making Preparations for celebrating a kind of Adoration to Divus Washington. How can these two Clamours be reconciled? The Celebration of the Birth day I can account for, by Blounts Motion to repeal the Funding System, because Hamiltons adulation can be Supported only by Washingtons Adoration. Another Obvious Motive is to cast disgrace, upon Washington\u2019s two Successors, Adams and Jefferson. Similar Motives have produced a Phenomenon in Boston. On the fourth of July, Washingtons Picture is placed behind the Table of the Principal Magistrates, Hamiltons opposite to him in the most conspicuous Spot in the whole Hall while the Pictures of Samuel Adams and John Hancock are crowded away in two obscure Corners. Thus is Fanuel Hall which ought to be as Sacred in Boston, as the Temple of Jupiter was on the Capitol Hill in Rome, made the Head Quarters of Fornication Adultery Incest, Libelling and Electioneering Intrigue. Yet Boston is the head Quarters of good Principles. One of the most Superb Blocks of Brick Buildings, too, erected lately by the Richest Man in the Town is which called Hamilton Place, and twenty other proud Palaces deserve the name as well.\nThe Clamours against the Embargo are no doubt intended to disgrace Jeffersons Administration. France and England had embargoed our Trade before We embargoed it. No prudent Merchant would Send a Ship to Sea, unless She had the Mark of one or other of the Beasts, perhaps both, for Some are capable of making their Court to both.\nMy old Acquaintance King George has broke his Word. He promised me he would be the last to disturb our Independence. But his Tyrannical Proclamation for impressing Seamen from our Merchant Ships is a flagrant disturbance of our Independence. He has Selected the hereditary Remnants of the old Butran Administration for his Ministry and they are reviving his old feelings. We must revive ours.\nCharge as much Ignorance Folly and Pride as you please upon the City of Washington. But lay none of it to me. Not one Shilling was spent upon it, by me. I could not get Bells Wires put up, to my Bells, when I lived in the Royal Palace.\nYou ask how different were our Feelings and Conduct in 1774? Different indeed. We then loved Liberty better than Money. Now We love Money better than Liberty. Then Liberty meant Security for Life Liberty Property and Character. Now the Word has changed its meaning and Signified Money, electioneering Tricks and Libels, and perhaps the Protection of French Armies and British Fleets.\nI am, dear Rush Still\nJ. Adams\nWhen my Parson Says \u201cLet Us Sing to the praise and Glory of G. W.\u201d your Church will adopt a new Collect in its Liturgy and Say \u201cSancte Washington ora pro nobis.\u201d\nBut you know that all this Adulation in the Leaders of it, is Shearly hypocritical. It would have added at Washington a Mausoleum of an hundred feet Square at the base, and an hundred feet high to the other Monuments of \u201cIgnorance Folly and Pride\u201d to be left in that place when Congress shall remove from it. I told my Friend Powell of Virginia at my own Table, that if that Bill for a Mausoleum passed I should be obliged to do the most unpopular Act of my whole unpopular Life, by Sending it back with a Negative and Reasons. Oh! Said Powell I hope not! I hope that when Anarchy shall invade Us, it will Stumble on that Rock and break its Shins.\nAt the time of Hamiltons Death, the Federal Papers avowed that Hamilton was the Soul and Washington the Body, or in other Words that Washington was the painted wooden head of the Ship and Hamilton the Pilot and Steersman.\nThus the World goes, has ever gone, and ever will go. And so let it go", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5232", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Henry Guest, 28 February 1808\nFrom: Guest, Henry\nTo: Adams, John\nHonorable Sir\nBrunswick 28 Febuary E\u2014Jersy 1808\u2014\nYour Letter of 18 January 1806 Per post Came duly to hand and I Assure you that it gave Me greate pleasure,\u2014for which be pleased to Except My Most Greatefull Thanks\u2014until Very Lately I had no Subject that I thought Worthy of my the Notice of your Superior Mind\u2014The Rever John Murry of Boston Lately paid Me A Short Visit As An Old frind that took him by the hand When he Was A Strainger in this Country\u2014I Asked him what Was Our friend Mr. Adams About in this Critical time of Our Country\u2014His Answer\u2014He is about his Farm mending up his fences &c &c\u2014So far so good Was my thought I Dair Say his Mind was Not Idly for the Salvation of his Country as his Second Self is high in the Estimation of his Fellow Citizens His Fathers Expierence and Advice, is Not Wanting to him\u2014of this I was fully Sensible,\u2014When I Read his Repourt of the 31 of December Last to the Senate, in the Case of John Smith of the State of Ohio\u2014I Congratelated our Country that We had a Man of Such Superiour powers in that Honorb. Department of Our Government and heartly Wished That At the Next Election He Might be Brought forward to fill the Vice Presidants Seat at Least. And As I am informd He is about the Middle Age, hope he May rise to that of the Highest honour Our grateful Country has it in their Country to Give\u2014\nSir It apears there has been Consultations at the Seat of Govern. Whom to nomenate at the next Election and that this forwardness is Much Dispised by Men of Superior Understanding\u2014I trust the Sons of Our Eastren States Will Come forward and Claim A right to Nominate and Suppourt one at Least of the Candidates As that Most respectable part in Our Government Certainly was and Ought to Come forward for that purpose\u2014Nither Do I think that the honist parts of Our Country Will be Sattisfied if one of the hiest Departments is Not fixed in one of the Eastren States\nSir My pen has Carried its ink Much farther than perhaps four Score Years Should have gone in this Vale of Struggle I trust that your Superior Knoledge will pardon All that is not Agreable to your Piercing Eye\u2014\nYours Most Affectionately\u2014\nHenry Guestpost. please to turn over.\nWhen Mr Murry Made the Answer As in the Enclosed I rose and got My Cane that is Made of true American grought 4 feet 6 inches Long and Desired him to prefetch it to you, But on Examining it found Some of the Varnish Worn off, Which was A Disappointment to Me, and He Excepted it. This thought Struck Me that As it Could Not be Broke It Might Serve you to Kill the Stoutest Serpent that was among the grass as Well as to Support Your tottring Limbs if You reached My Age, Some times Our Disappointments turns Out to Advantage Let Me try this point. I have Another Made for you, and As Your Son Will Come by My Dore on his return home Will You be So good as to desire him to Call on Me for it As I Shall be greately pleased to See one of our Most Superior Men before I go to the World of Spirits or if it is Not too Much for Me to Ask for him to Stay one Night With Me, He shall have A Clean Bed And if A Dry Excalent Soft Water I dare Say As good as That of Father Jacobs well that So Much is Said of it in times of old\u2014Most heartily Wishing You health and As Much happyness As this Lower Region Can Affoard\nI Am Hond. Sir your Most Humble Servt\u2014\nHenry Guest", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5233", "content": "Title: To John Adams from James Lovell, 10 March 1808\nFrom: Lovell, James\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir\nBoston March 10th 1808.\nHoping to have, very speedily, an opportunity of testifying my Esteem of you, at your own house, in propria person\u00e2; I now take the freedom of making a previous intreaty that you would find from Judge Cranch the origin of the Katascoptic Club; which met at the Chamber of Edmd. Quincy 3. times in a Chamber at in the Widow Salter\u2019s House where Gl. Donnison now lives; \u2013 in 1756 or 57.\nI beg you also to consider whether you have, in your Library, any continuation of what is historically inserted in your \u201cDefense\u201d respecting Bologna;\u2014as I shall put into my Pocket a silver Medal the Legend of which I cannot decypher with any tollerable accuracy, without further assistance.\nWith cordial Regards for your Lady, I am as ever to You\nJames Lovell", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5234", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan Van der Kemp, 17 March 1808\nFrom: Van der Kemp, Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir!\nOlden barneveld 17 March. 1808.\nI flatter me Self with the fond hope, that m\u00ff old and high-revered friend Shall not, after Such a long Silence, be displeased by m\u00ff intrusion. I can not bear it longer, to withold me Self the Satisfaction\u2014of assuring you once more of m\u00ff warm attachment, and unabated respect\u2014tho I must appear before you with empty hands\u2014So empty\u2014as not to defra\u00ff the loss of you precious time, in the perusal of these few lines. I might yet have delay\u2019d this Letter a while, had I, as usuall\u00ff, Seen the annual proof of your continued health in the Public-papers; but even this had been witholden\u2014and now I can alone appeal\u2014to your condescending kindness\u2014with which You have favored me, nearl\u00ff 28 years\u2014to inform me\u2014at your leasure\u2014with a few words, that Mr and Mrs Adams enjo\u00ff\u2014in their advancing age\u2014health and contentment. Ma\u00ff the Almighty preserve it to your Both un-interrupted, as far human nature allows and with your final happiness is compatible, till the last breath of your Lives\u2014and may these be prolonged, till I Shall be no more!\n I dare not touch an\u00ff political Subject\u2014tho man\u00ff\u2014in these days of darkness have occupied my mind\u2014as I am apprehensive that you ma\u00ff have been disgusted too much by Similar topics\u2014thro the forlorn Situation of our countr\u00ff. God forbid, that you Should deem it desperate, tho I fear that lenient measures Shall in vain be applied for its recover\u00ff\u2014the time is, I am apprehensive, fast approaching\u2014that no cure is to be expected\u2014without applying the extremes of Hippocrates ense\u2014and if that is not powerful enough\u2014igne. I presume howewer, that, if the Severe rod of chatisement must be inflicted upon us, you will devoutly wish with me, that we ma\u00ff fall in\u2014and rather be chastised by God\u2014than by man\u2014The worst I dread deprecate is that the angel of perdition\u2014who desolates Europe\u2014ma\u00ff not be permitted, to Stretch his Sword to this continent\u2014then I Should Scarce witthstand the desponding apprehension, that this nation was devoted to destruction even in its youth\u2014Excuse me, worthy man! I did not intend to touch this String.\nI have Spend the best part of this winter in revolving Plin\u00ff and Cicero\u2014and am now advanced in the later\u2019s Philosophical works\u2014what a vast deal of knowledge is accumulated by the first! how far does he excel the host of our modern Philosophasters\u2014who often plume themselves with his feathers, and give it for modern discoveries\u2014to an ignorant crowd. How much might be learned by our modern Orators\u2014and Speech-mongers from Tull\u00ff! I lament that So few Study him\u2014even in a translation\u2014But they are, generally, So enlightened\u2014So original\u2014that they Scorn Similar aids\u2014and\u2014with a little of it, they often would escape man\u00ff blunders. I perused this winter a well-written pamphlet upon our foreign relations\u2014in which\u2014to my Sensible mortification\u2014as I had admired it through-out\u2014I found Eaton compared with Mithridates\u2014Had the first page been Sullied with this comparison, I Should Scarce have possessed courage enough, to read it to the end.\nI perused this winter Marshall\u2019s life of Washington\u2014and have been highly gratified with it\u2014tho\u2019 I consider the first vol. as the less Significant\u2014and Should not have complained, if it had received no imprimatur. In my opinion\u2014it would have had a better if not greater affect\u2014to have taken Robertsons Introduction for his pattern\u2014and have delineated with a philosophical acutenes from the then Situation of Europe and America generally, and especially from the individual nations, concerned in that high contest\u2014the outlines of a grand Tableau\u2014b\u00ff which the grand events of the 18 & 19 Cent.\u2014might have been illuminated\u2014\nI had no tidings from Holland Since m\u00ff worth\u00ff frend\u2019s decease\u2014this alone\u2014I cannot forbear transcribing from a Letter of m\u00ff Son at Philadelphia to his mother, as I know\u2014you feel for that devoted Countr\u00ff\u2014The Dutch had been Severil\u00ff handled in the Moniteur\u2014the following was the repl\u00ff of Le journal Politique de Le\u00ffde:\n\u201cL\u2019on a lu ic\u00ff avec le plus vif Sentiment de peine l\u2019article inser\u00e9e dans le Moniteur du 11 de ce mois. Depuis la paix continentale, et principalement depuis le retour du notre Roi, nous avons et\u00e9 temoins des mesures rigoureuses, que l\u2019on a introduites pour la Stricte execution du Blocus. Nous Souffrons avec patience, esperant que le Grand Napoleon nous S\u00e7auroit gre de notre devouement a la cause commune, et de notre constante admiration pour lui: aussi nous esperons, qu\u2019il Soutiendra notre courage, en ne donnant pas creance a des reproches, que nous ne meritons pas. La meilleure preuve, qu\u2019il n\u2019existe aucune Correspendence entre L\u2019Angleterre et la Hollande, c\u2019est, que les Lettres passent par Hambourg: qui pourroit empecher qu\u2019on ne lui addressat des lettres? S\u2019il etoit besoin, de citer d\u2019autres preuves de la rigidite extreme, que l\u2019on port au Blocus, nous dirions, que plusieurs batimens avec des cargaisons considerables se sont echou\u00e9s sur nos c\u00f6tes, par le refus, qu\u2019on a fait, de les admettre. Que les Proprietaires des fonds Anglois n\u2019en recoivent rien depuis longtems, et qu\u2019enfin nos propres denrees Coloniales ont et\u00e9 confisques. Mais nous esperons, que le grand Genie, qui preside au destin\u00e9e de l\u2019Univers, S\u00e7aura gr\u00e9 un jours de Sa constante lo\u00ffaut\u00e9, de Sa fidilite, et de Son devoument a un Peuple, qui possede moins qu\u2019un autre peut-etre l\u2019art de bien exprimer, ou d\u2019exaggerer Ses Sentiments, mais qui depuis douze ans fait profession d\u2019une profonde admiration pour le plus grand des Mortels\u201d \nIf the Dutch, Says my Son, had not, l\u2019art de bien exprimer ou d\u2019exaggerer Ses Sentiments, the\u00ff begin to learn it\u2014\nAlas poor Dutchman! but does the American name Stand higher\u2014at present? or is it rather a Subject of Scorn and contempt? and can truth Sanction the assertion\u2014that the fault is that of the Administration\u2014When the People at large continue to Support it\u2014notwithstanding they are brought on the brink of perdition?\nPermit me\u2014to recommend once mor an old affectionate and devoted frend to your kind remembrance. I Shall remain / with high respect your obliged friend and St\u2014\n P.S. having Spent a part of the winter in researches\u2014appartening to Euly: histor\u00ff\u2014at the Request of Correspondents\u2014I have now finished a Sketch of the life of Servetus\u2014I would have Send it, could I have expected\u2014that you were not averse from Similar discussions\u2014the newness might perhaps recommend it. If So, and you\u2014wish to See\u2014a Single word of command\u2014and I Shall conve\u00ff it the instant it is returned by a Literar\u00ff frend?", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5235", "content": "Title: From John Adams to James Sullivan, March 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Sullivan, James\nDraught of a review of the letter of Timothy Pickering to Governor Sullivan published in March 1808. Not printed.March 1808\nMr Pickerings Letter\nNeither Mr Pickerings claim to a Share of Attention, nor the republican duty to be jealous of public Men, if resonably interpreted, will be controverted, by me, upon this occasion. I must nevertheless acknowledge, that I am not one of those Republicans, who admire the Doctrine of the Duty and Virtue of Jealousy. Much Savage Brutality, I fear, has been introduced into the World, by it. Every Man cannot comprehend, how a mean Passion, can be transformed, by Republican Magic into a great quality, or an odious Vice, into an heroic Virtue. The Disposition intended, would be better expressed, by Republican Vigilance: or an Attentive observation, and carefull Examination of the Characters of public Men and the Conduct of public measures. The Candor of a Man, the Charity of a Christian, and the generous confidence of Friendship, ought forever to be extended by Republicans, to their Rulers, Men of their own Selection from the rest of their Fellow Citizens, for their Guides and Rulers, at least untill Evidence appears of Error or Misconduct. (As it is, however, of little consequence to dispute about Words, I shall consent to use Mr Pickerings Expression, for the purpose of the present argument, in the Sense in which he appears to have intended it.)\nThere are Jealousies abroad, that Some public Men are desirous of a War with Great Britain, and others of a War with France. I Shall not discuss the Question, whether any or all of these Jealousies are well or ill founded, or none of them. This Republican Virtue of Jealousy, ought at least, to be as wide awake, against the Motives and designs of foreign Courts, as against those of our own Rulers, Men of our own Choice and Bone of our Bone. Nor are the Measures of Great Britain and the designs of her Court, objects of less reasonable Jealousy, than those of France. The mercantile Capitals, and the Naval Power of Great Britain, all the World knows, are her Pride and boast. A reasonable Man may Suspect, that our great Capitals So Suddenly grown up, the multiplication of our Seamen, the Increase of our Tonnage, and the astonishing extension of our Navigation and Enterprize, have excited in Great Britain, a Jealousy of our maritime Resources; and a terror too, that these Advantages may soon excite a feeling in our bosoms of our national Strength and dissipate our prejudices against a Navy: Prejudices which have been greatly fomented, both by French and English Influence. A Republican ought to be jealous of the Jealousy of foreign Nations as well as of his own Governors, and indeed that of his own heart. He can never to be too jealous of himself. Jealousy like Charity Should begin at home. Republicans who reserve to themselves Such a Trust as is implied, in the multiplied Elections of this Country, ought to be very attentive to their own Motives, and examine their own hearts, in order to be sure, that under a pretext of Republican Jealousy, they do not conceal, Ambition Avarice Envy, Revenge Resentment, hatred or any other Sinister Passion or Interest.\nI shall not charge Mr Pickering with any intentional deception in any part of his Letter: but in Stating the Papers laid by the President before Congress as the Grounds of the Embargo, he has given So partial a description of one of them, as might have a tendency to deceive many and I doubt not has deceived thousands of his Readers. I mean the Proclamation of the King of Great Britain. Mr Pickering calls it \u201cThe Proclamation of the King of Great Britain, requiring the Return of his Subjects, the Seamen especially from foreign Countries, to Aid, in this hour of peculiar danger in the defence of their Country.\u201d But this is concealing the Asp in a Basket of Figgs. The dangerous, alarming and fatal Part of the Proclamation is kept carefully out of Sight.\nProclamations of this kind though perhaps of immemorial Usage in the Beginnings of Wars, are in Substance and Effect, Simple Invitations to natural born Britons who happen to be abroad to return home. Today the Right of the King to issue them, would be as absurd as to deny his right to Send a Card of Compliment to any of his Subjects to dine with him on St. George\u2019s day. As it is natural to every human Mind to Sympathize with its native Country, when in danger and distress, it is well known that considerable numbers of British Subjects commonly return home from various foreign Countries in consequence of these Invitations. The British Ambassadors, Consuls, Agents, Governors and other officers give the Proclamations a general Circulation, Stimulate and encourage the People to return, and contrive many means to facilitate their Passages. All this is very well.\u2014Nobody will object to it.\nBut on the other hand it is equally clear, that British Subjects in foreign Countries are under no indispensible obligation of Religion Morality, Law or Policy to return. No Penalty is annexed by English Laws, to any neglect; no, nor to any direct and formal disobedience. Hundreds neglect and disobey the Proclamations to one who complies with them. Thousands who have formed Establishments and Settled Families, or became naturalized, or made Contracts, or inlisted on board Merchant Ships, or even Ships of War, in foreign Countries, pay no regard to these orders or Invitations of their former Sovereign. Indeed all who have become naturalized in foreign Countries, or entered into Contracts of any kind public or private, with Government, or Merchants, or Farmers or Manufacturers, have no right to return, untill they have fulfilled their Covenants and Obligations.\nThe President of the United States has as legal Authority to issue Similar Proclamations, and they would be as much respected by American Citizens all over the Globe. But every American would Say his complyance was voluntary, and none whose Engagements abroad were incompatible with Complyance, would obey.\nMr Pickering Says it is an acknowledged Principle, that every Nation has a Right to the Service of its Subjects in time of War.\u2014By whom is this Principle acknowledged?\u2014By no Man, I believe, in the unlimited Sense, in which it is here asserted.\u2014With certain qualifications and restrictions it may be admitted. Within the Realm and in his own Dominions The King has a Right to the Service of his Subjects by voluntary Inlistments by Sea and Land, and to Send them abroad upon foreign Voyages and Expeditions: but it would be difficult to prove the Right of any Sovereign of a free People to compell free Subjects, into Service by Conscriptions and Impressments, like Galley Slaves, at the Point of the Bayonett. Extream Cases and imperious Necessities, it is said have no Laws. But such Extremities and Necessities must be very obvious, to the whole Nation, or freemen will not comply. Impressments of Seamen from British Merchant Ships, in Port or at Sea, is are no better than the Conscriptions of Soldiers by Napoleon, or Lewis the fourteenth who Set him the Example.\u2014So much for that part of the Proclamation, which Mr Pickering has produced to public View; Now for the other Part, which he has concealed.\nThe King not only commands his Subjects to return, but he commands the officers of his Navy to Search the Merchant Ships of Neutrals, (that is Americans, for it is not applicable to any other\u2019s nor intended to be applied to any others) and impress all British Seamen they find on board without regard to any Allegations of Naturalization, without regard to any Certificates of Citizenship; without regard to any Contracts Covenants or Connections they have formed with Captains or Owners; and without regard to any Marriages, Families or Children they may have in America. And in what Principle or Law is this founded? Is there any Law of God to Support it? Is there any Law of Nature to justify it? Is there any Law of England to justify authorize it? Certainly not. The Laws of England have no binding force, on board American Ships. No more than the Laws of the Medes and Persians. The Laws of the United States alone have Dominion over our Merchant Ships. In what Law then is it grounded? In the Law of Nations? It is but Proclamation, for the first time a Counterfeit foisted into that Law by this arbitrary fraud, an Interpolation into that Law with a Vengeance. Such a Title as \u201cImpressment of Seamen,\u201d was never found in any Code of Laws since the first Canoe was launched into the Sea; not even in that of England. Whoever Claims a Right must produce a Law to Support it. But this Proclamation attempts to transfer the pretended Right, of impressing Seamen from their own Ships which in truth is only an enormous Abuse, of to the Impressment of Seamen over from foreign Nations, foreign Ships and foreign Subjects. The horror of this gross Attempt; this affront to our Understandings as well as Feelings; this contempt of our natural and national Resentment of Injuries, as well as of our Sympathies with fellow Creatures and Fellow Citizens, Suffering the vilest oppression under Inhumanity and Cruelty; could never have appeared in the World, had not the Spirits of Lord Bute and Lord George Germain risen again at St James\u2019s.\nIt is in vain for Britons to Say, these Men are the Kings Subjects. How are they the Kings Subjects? By British Laws. And what are British Laws to Us on the high Seas? No more than the Laws of Draco. We Americans must Say, they are our Fellow Citizens by our Laws. They have Sworn Allegiance to the United States. We have admitted them to all the Rights and Priviledges of American Citizens, and by this have contracted with them to Support and defend them in the Enjoyment of them. Our Laws acknowledge no divine Rights of Kings, greater than those of Subjects nor any indefeasible Duty of Subjects more than that of Kings to obedience. These Remnants of Feudal Tyranny and Ecclesiastical Superstition are long Since exploded in America. The King claims them, not to protect them but to make them Slaves: The President of the United States claims them, as it is his duty to do by his office and his oath, not to enslave them but to protect them and preserve them force. Our Laws are as good as British Laws; our Citizens have as good a Right to protection, as British Subjects and our Government is as much bound to afford it.\nWhat is Impressment of Seamen in England in their own Ports, from their own Ships, or within the four Seas?\u2014It is said to be an Usage: So was Ship Money, Loans and Benevolences in the Reign of Charles the first: and arguments were used by his Courtiers to prove their Legality at least as conclusive as any that are produced by Judge Foster, in favour of Impressment. It is at best, but an Abuse tolerated and connived at, like the Kidknapping in Holland, of Settlers for Batavia. It is in direct contradiction and Violation of every Principle of English Liberty. It is in direct Violation of Magna Charta and the fifty five Confirmations of it in Parliament and a defyance of all the Ecclesiastical Execrations against the Violators of it. It is in direct Contradiction to all their other Statutes, Bills and Petitions of Right. It deprives Men of their Liberty, Property, and often of their Lives, without Allegation or pretence of Crime or Sin. It deprives them of all Tryal by Jury, and Subjects them to Scourges and to death, by Martial-Law and the Judgment of Courts Martial. It is a kind of civil War. It is said that in a general Impressment like that of Admiral Keppel, it cost the Nation an hundred Pounds a Man for every Man they obtained, in Cutter\u2019s Luggers Press Gangs and it might have been added, in Nanny houses and Rendezvouses of Corruption and Debauchery. The Practice is not avowed or acknowledged by the Nation. No Parliament ever dared to legitimate or Sanction it. No Court of Law ever dared to give a Judgment in favour of it. No Jury ever gave a verdict to countenance it. No Judge that I ever heard of, till Foster, ever ventured to give a private opinion to encourage it. Thurlow when he was Chancellor, hazarded a Saying to a Committee of the City of London, that the Practice of the Impressment of Seamen was legal. But the Committee answerd, respectfully but firmly, though before the King in Council \u201cWe acknowledge the high Authority of your Lordships opinion but We must declare, that We are of a very different opinion\u201d and their Answer appeared to be applauded by the Nation.\u2014Press Gangs are continually opposed and resisted at Sea, by the Sailors whenever they have the means or the least hope of escaping. Navy officers and Men are not unfrequently killed: yet there is no Inquisition for their blood. As little Noise as possible is made about it.\u2014It is known to be justifiable homicide to take the Life of an Assailant, in the necessary defence of a Mans Liberty. There is not a Jury in England, who would find a Verdict of Murder of or Manslaughter, against any Sailor on Land or at Sea, who should kill any one of a Pressgang, in the necessary defence of his Liberty from Impressment. Pressgangs on Shore, are often resisted by the People fired on, and Some of them wounded and sometimes killed. Yet no Inquisition is made for this. The Practice is held in Abhorrence by the Man of Warsmen, themselves. The Boatswain of the Rose Frigate After the Acquittal of the four Irish Sailors, who were prosecuted in a Special Court of Admiralty for killing a gallant and amiable officer Lieutenant Panton, said \u201cThis is a kind of Work in which I have been almost constantly engaged for the last twenty years, that is in fighting with brave and honest Men Sailors to deprive them of their Liberty. I always thought I deserved to be hang\u2019d for it: and now I know it.\u201d\u2014Since I have alluded to the Case of the four Irish Sailors it may not be amiss to recollect Some other Circumstances of it. A Press Gang from the Rose Frigate, commanded by Lieutenant Panton with a Midshipman and a Number of ordinary Seamen, visited and Searched a Ship from Marblehead belonging to Mr Hooper at Sea. The Lieutenant enquired if any English, Irish or Scotchmen were on board. Not Satisfied with the Answers to his Questions, he proceeded to Search the ship, from Stern to Stem. At last he found four Irishmen hid in the forepeake Forepeake. With Swords and Pistols, he immediately laid Sigge Siege and blockaded the Forepeake, Summoning the four Sailors to Surrender. Corbett who had the cool Intrepidity of a Nelson or a Smith, reasoned and remonstrated; and Lord Mansfield could not have laid down the Law with more Precision than he did. \u201cI know you.\u2014You are the Lieutenant of a Man of War, come with a Press Gang to deprive me of my Liberty. You have no Right to impress me. I have retreated from you, as far as I can. I can go no farther. I, and my Companions are determined to Stand upon our defence. Stand off.\u201d The Sailors used their Usual Language to each other, and the Midshipman in Confusion, fired a Pistol into the Forepeake which broke the Arm of one of the four. Corbett Stood at the Entrance and the Lieutenant, was engaged in a Contest of Menaces and Defyances with him. Corbett repeated what he had before said and added and marking a Line with a Harpoon in the Salt with which the Ship was loaded, Said with a great oath, You are determined to deprive me of my Liberty and I am determined to defend it. If you Step over that Line I shall consider it as proof that you are determined to impress me & (here a he Swore a great oath) you are a dead Man.\u201d Aye! My Lad Said the Lieutenant, I have Seen many a brave Fellow before you.\u201d Taking his Snuff box, out of his Pockett, and taking a Pinch of Suff Snuff, he very deliberately Stepped over the Line in the Salt and attempted to Seize Corbett!\u2014Corbet drawing back his Arm, and driving his harpoon with all his Force, laid the Lieutenant dead at his feet. The Rose sent a Reinforcement to the Press Gang, broke down the Bulkhead Seized the four Irishmen and brought them to Tryal for Pyracy and Murder. The Court consisted of Governor Bernard Governor Wentworth, Chief Justice Hutchinson, Judge Auchmuty, Commodore Hood himself who commanded then all the Ships of War on the Station, now a Peer of the British Empire, and twelve or fifteen others Councillors of Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Rhode Island. After the Tryal The President, Governor Bernard pronounced the Judgment of the Court, that the Action of the Prisoners was Justifiable Homicide, and in this opinion the Court was unanimous. The Sailor who was wounded in the Arm brought an Action against the Midshipman, and Commodore Hood himself interposed, & made Compensation to the Sailor to his Satisfaction, after which the Action was withdrawn.\nSuch was the Impressment of Seamen, as it Stood by Law, before our Revolution. Yet Mr Pickering thinks, that as every Nation has a Right to the Service of its Subjects in time of War, the Proclamation of the King of Great Britain, commanding his naval officers, to practice Such Impressments, on board, not the Vessels of his own Subjects, but of the United States, a foreign Nation, could not furnish the Slightest ground for an Embargo! It is not enough necessary for me to Say that any Thing could furnish a Sufficient ground for the Embargo for any long time. This I leave to the Responsibility of our Government. But I Say with confidence, that it furnished a Sufficient ground for a declaration of War. Not the Murder of Pierce, nor all the Murders on board the Chesapeake, nor all the other Insults and Injuries, We have received from foreign Nations, atrocious as they have been, can be of Such dangerous lasting and pernicious Consequence to this Country, as this Proclamation, if We have Servility enough to submit to it.\nWhat would Mr Pickering have advised? Would he counsel, the President to Stipulate, in a Treaty with the King of Great Britain, that his Navy officers Should forever hereafter have a Right to visit and Search all American Merchant Ships and impress from them all English Scotch and Irish Seamen? Will Mr Pickering be So good as to explain the distinction between Ships of War and Merchant Ships? Are not Merchant Ships, under the Jurisdiction and intitled to the Protection of the Laws of their own Country upon the high Seas as much as Ships of War? Is not a Merchant Ship as really the Territory of the United States as a Ship of War? Would Mr Pickering Advise the President and Congress to acquiesce Silently in this Proclamation and permit it to be executed forever hereafter? Would not Such a tame and Silent acquiescence, as effectually yield the point, and establish the Law and the Practice, as an express Stipulation in a Solemn Treaty? If the United States had as powerful a Navy as Great Britain, and Great Britain as feeble a force at Sea as ours is, would Mr Pickering advise the President either to concede the Principle by Treaty, or acquiesce in it, in Silence? Does the Circumstance of Great Power, or great Weakness, make any alteration in the Principle or the Right? Should the Captain and Crew of an American Merchantman, resist a British Press gang, on the high Seas, and in defence of their Liberty kill the Commander and all under him, and then make their Escape, and after returning to Salem be prosecuted, would Mr Pickering as a Judge or a Juror, give his Judgment for finding them guilty of Murder or Piracy?\nAlthough the Embargo was made the Watchword in our late Elections the Votes in our greatest Nurseries of Seamen, for Examples, in Salem Marblehead, Barnstable, Sandwich and other Places, Seemed to Shew that our Seamen preferred to be embargoed rather than to go to Sea to be impressed.\nPerhaps it may be Said, that We have nothing to do with the Question in England concerning the Legality or Illegality of Impressment. This is readily acknowledged, as long as they confine the Law and the Practice to their own territory; their own Ships, and their own Seamen.\u2014We Shall leave them to justify their own Usage, whether it is a mere Abuse, or a legitimate Custom, to their own Conciences, to their own Sense of Equity, Humanity or Policy. But when they arrogate a Right, and presume in fact, to transfer this Usage to foreign Nations, or rather to Americans whom they presume to distinguish from all other foreign Nations, it becomes the indispensable Duty of our Government to their fellow Citizens, to oppose and resist it, and the Duty of the People to Support their Government, in Such opposition to the Utmost of their Power.\nPermit Us now to inquire, what will be the Effects, of an established Law and Practice of British Impressment of Seamen from American Ships, upon the Commerce, the Navigation and the Peace of the United States, and above all upon the Minds and Hearts of the our Seamen?\nIn considering those innumerable dangers from Winds and Seas, Rocks and Shoals, to which Ships are exposed in their Voyages, The Owner and the Master of his Ship, must Sitt down together, and in order to determine the Number of Seamen necessary for the Voyage, they must calculate the Chances of Impressment, and engage a Supernumerary List of Sailors that they may be able to Spare as many as a British Lieutenant Shall please to take, and have enough left to Secure the Safety of the Ship and Cargo, and above all, the Lives of the Master and the Crew. They know not how many British Ships of War they may meet, nor how many Sailors, the Conscience of each Lieutenant, may allow him to impress. For the Lieutenant is to be Judge, Jury, Sheriff and Goaler, to every Seaman in American Vessells. He is to try many important Questions. Whether the Sailor is a Native of America? Whether he is an Englishman, Scotchman? Whether he emigrated to America before the Revolutionary War or Since? For no Evidence is to be admitted of any Naturalization by our Laws, in any of the States, Since the Revolution. Indeed the Doctrine of the inherent and unalienable Duty of Allegiance is asserted So peremptorily in the Proclamation, that the Lieutenant may think it his Duty to impress, every Man who was born in the British Dominions. It may be the opinion of this august Judge, that the Connection between the King and Subject, is so Sacred and divine, that Allegiance cannot be dissolved by any Treaty the King has made, or even by any Act of Parliament. And this pious Sentiment may Subject all of Us to Impressment at once. This however, en passant.\nThe Lieutenant is to order the Captain of the Merchant Ship to lay before him, a List of his Crew.\u2014He is then to command the Crew to be ordered or Summoned, or mustered, to pass in review before him. A Trybunal ought to be erected. The Lieutenant is to be the Judge, possessed of greater Authority than the Chief Justice of any of our particular States, or even than the Chief Justice of the United States. The Midshipman is to be Clerk, and the Boatswain Sheriff, or Marshall. And who are these Lieutenants? Commonly very young Gentlemen, the younger Sons of wealthy Families who have purchased their Commissions, to give them a living, instead of putting them Apprentices to Trade Merchandize, Law, Physick or Divinity. Their Education, their Experience, their Manners their Principles are so well known that I Shall Say nothing of them. Lord Keppell Said that he knew the Universal Maxim of British Seamen to be \u201cto do no right and receive no Wrong.\u201d The Principles of the officers I believe to be Somewhat better. But in this they all Agree officers and Men, that the World was created for the British Nation, and that all Nature and Nations were made for the Dignity and Omnipotence of the British Navy.\nIt is impossible to figure to ourselves, in imagination, this Solemn Tribunal and this venerable Judge\nHigh on a Splendid Seat which far outshone\nHenleys gilt Tub or Flecno\u2019s Irish Throne\nwithout Laughter,\u2014till the Humiliation of our Country comes into our Thoughts and interrupts the Sense of ridicule by the Tears of Grief or Vengeance.\nThe Lieutenant examines the Countenance, the Gate and Air of every Seaman; commands him to speak that he may know him. He pronounces his Accent and Dialect to be that of the Scotch Irish, West Country, Yorkshire, Welch, Jersey Guernsey, Alderney or Park. Many Native Americans, are the Sons of Emigrants from all those Countries and retain a tincture of the Language of their Fathers and Grandfathers. These will be decided to be The Kings Subjects. Many will be found to be Emigrants, or descendants of Emigrants from Germany Holland, Sweeden, Spain Portugal, Italy. These will be adjudged by the Lieutenant not to be native Americans. The will be thought to have no Friends in America, who will care enough about them to make much noise, and these will be impressed. If there Should be any Natives or Sons of Natives, of any of the West India Islands, or of any part of the East Indies, where The King is said to have thirty Millions of Subjects, these must all be impressed, for Conquest confers, the indelible Character of Subject as well as Birth. But if neither English Scotch Irish, Welch, Italian, German Dutchman, Spaniard Portuguese, East or West Indiaman is found, the Lieutenant will think, if he is prudent enough not to Say \u201cJura negat sibi lata, nihil non Arrogat Armis.\u201d \u201cOur Ship is So weakly manned that We cannot fight an Ennemy; We cannot even navigate her with Safety in bad Weather. Procul a Jove, procul a fulmine. I will take as many native Americans as I please; it will be long before I can be called to account; and at last I can Say, that I Saved the Kings Ship, and perhaps beat a Frenchman a Spaniard or a Dutchman, by this meritorious Impressment; and I am Sure of Friends who will not only bring me off, but obtain Promotion for me, even for the merit of this patriotic Action.\u201d\nAll these Things the Captain and the owner of an American Merchant Ship must take into consideration and make the Subjects of calculation before they can venture to Sea. In Short there Should be a Corporation erected in every State, for the express purpose of insuring against the Impressment of Seamen. In a course of time and Experience, the Chances might be calculated, So that the Insurers and insured, might at a great expence be Secure: but the poor Sailors can never be Safe.\nThe law must be Settled or remain unsettled.\u2014If Such Impressments are determined to be legal, either by Treaty or by tacit Acquiescence in the Kings Proclamation, it will establish in the Minds of British Seamen, a Sense of Superiority and a Spirit of Domination, and in the Minds of American Seamen, a Conciousness of Inferiority and a Servile Spirit of Submission, that Ages will not eradicate. If the question is allowed to remain undetermined, American Seamen will fight in defence of their Liberty whenever they See the Smallest prospect of escaping, and Sometimes when there is none. They will kill and be killed. Some will be punished for their resistance, on board the British Men of War, and some may be carried to Some British Port and there prosecuted for Pyracy and Murder. This however will Seldom if never if ever be done for I Still believe there is Sense and Justice enough in the British Nation and their Juries to acquit any Sailor American or British, who Should kill a Press gang in defence of his Liberty. But if he should escape and return to America and be here prosecuted, I will not believe there is a Judge or a Juror on the Continent So ignorant of the Law, So dead to every Sense of Justice So abandoned by every feeling of humanity, as to find him guilty of any Crime, if it were proved that he had killed a dozen Press gangs in defence of his freedom. We shall have a continual Warfare at Sea, like that lately at Canton. Our Secretary of States office will be filled with Representations and Complaints, our Nation will be kept in a constant State of Irritation and fermentation, and our Government always distressed between their Anxiety to relieve their Fellow Citizens and their inability to Serve them.\nA Republican who asserts the Duty of Jealousy, So peremptorily as Mr Pickering has done, ought to have Suspected, that this Proclamation was dictated, by a Spirit as hostile and malicious as it is insidious, for one the determined purpose of depressing the Character of our Seamen. Take from a Sailor his Pride and his Spirit, and he remains a poor Animal indeed; broken hearted, dejected, depressed even below the Standard of other Men of his own level in Society. An habit of Fear will be establish\u2019d in his Mind. At the Sight of a British Man of War, a panick will Seize him; his Spirits will Sink, and if it be only a Cutter or Lugger, he will think of nothing but flight and Escape. What, but the haughty Spirit of their Seamen which has been encouraged and Supported for Ages by the Nation, has given the British Navy its Superiority over France and Spain?\n\u201cWho Shall dare to Sett bounds, to the Commerce and Naval Power of Great Britain?\u201d is the magnificent Language in Parliament, and it vibrates and ecchoes, from every heart in the Nation. Every British Sailor is made to believe himself, the Master and Commander of the World. If the Right of Impressment is conceded by Us, in Theory or practice, our Seamens hearts will be broken: and every British Seaman will Say to every American Seaman, as the Six Nations of Indians Said to the Southern Tribes whom they had conquered \u201cWe have put Petticoats on you.\u201d\nIn Such a Case Mr Pickerings Republican Jealousy ought to Say, let Us no longer think of a Navy: let Us no longer think of Independence: let Us no longer hope for Commerce, or any rank in the World; let Us again bow our Necks to the yoke of Great Britain\nBut if the Spirit of a Man, Should Still remain in our Seamen or any of them, they will fight in defence of their Liberty, whenever they See the Smallest chance of Success, and Sometimes when they See none. Suppose, a British Cutter, Should demand to visit and Search an American Merchant Ship of five hundred Tons burthen armed with Swivels and Musquetry and perhaps Some Small Pieces of Cannon as Merchant Ships have a right to be, and often are, at least for defence against Pirates. The Commander of the Cutter calls for a Muster of the Men, in order to impress Such as he in his Wisdom Shall judge to be British Subjects. Is it to be Supposed that the Captain and the Crew of the Merchantmen, will Submit to Such Visitation and Impressment? No. He will Sink the Boat and the Cutter too, if he can, rather than be so insulted, and Every American must applaud him for his Spirit.\nIs this right of Visitation, Search and Impressment to be all on one Side, or is it to be reciprocal? British Modesty may Say, it is an exclusive Priviledge which We claim, assert and will maintain, because it is necessary to the Support of our Domination over the Ocean, which is necessary to preserve a ballance of Power in Europe against France, and to prevent Napoleon from Sending over fifty thousand Men to conquer the United States of America. All this will not convince American Seamen. They will answer, \u201cWe think a ballance of Power on the Ocean, as necessary as on the Continent of Europe. We thank you for your Civility in kindly giving Us hopes that you will defend Us from the French Army of fifty Thousand Men. But We are very willing to take our defence upon ourselves. If you claim have a Right to impress Seamen from our Ships We have an equal Right to impress from yours.\u201d Suppose one of our gun boats should meet a British East Indiaman armed as they Sometimes are with fifty guns, though only a private Ship and a Merchantman. The Commander of the gun boat, demands a Search for American Seamen. Calls for the Muster Roll commands the Men to be mustered and pass in review before him. Would the East India Captain submit? No: he would Sooner throw overboard the Press gang from the Gun boat overboard, and run down and Sink the Gun Boat.\u2014Such will be the perpetual Altercations and Hostilities at Sea between Britons and Americans, and lay the immoveable foundation of eternal hatred between the two Nations. It will be f The Kings Proclamation will be found, as impolitic a Step as ever the Court of St. Jamess has taken.\nMr Pickering Says \u201cThe British Ships of War, agreably to a Right, claimed and exercised for Ages\u2014a Right claimed and exercised during the whole of the Administrations of Washington, of Adams and of Jefferson, continue to take some of the British Seamen, found on board our Merchant Vessells, and with them a Small Number of ours, from the impossibility of always distinguishing Englishmen from the Citizens of the United States.\u201d\nWe have before Seen what Sort of a Right to Impress Men from their own Ships, has been claimed, and in what manner it has been exercised, and in what light it has been considered by the English Nation. It amounts to a right of getting their officers lawfully killed. But Surely No Right was ever claimed or exercised to impress Men from foreign Ships. If Such a Crime was ever committed, I presume it would be no more a proof of a Right than a Robbery, Burglary or Murder committed on shore would prove that Such Actions were innocent and lawful. To argue from Single Facts or a few Instances to a general Law has been too much the practice of Writers on the Law of Nations. But None of them ever went the to Such Extravagance as this. Impressment of Seamen in America was expressly forbidden by Parliament long before a Proclamation No Claim or Pretension of Such a Right to search foreign Vessels for Seamen therefore ever existed before that \u00c6ra our Revolution: and no Exercise of Such a Right ever prevailed, except Such as resembled the Exercises of the Right of Robbery Burglary and Murder in Some of our American Cities. No Ages have passed Since our Revolution. The Right was never asserted or claimed, till the late Proclamation of the King appeared: and this Proclamation will make an Epocha of Disaster, Disgrace and Ruin, to one Nation or the other, possibly to both. From the Peace of 1783 to the Commencement of our Government under the present National Constitution, whenever any American Seamen were impressed, they were immediately demanded in the Name of the old Congress, and immediately discharged without ever pretending to any Such Right of Impressment. During the Administration of Washington, whenever information was received of any Impressment, immediate orders were sent to demand the Men, and the Men were liberated. Washington Sent Captain Talbot to the West Indies as an Agent to demand Seamen impressed on board British Men of War. Talbot demanded them of the British Commanders, Captains and Admirals and was refused. He went then on shore and demanded and obtained of the Chief Justice of the Island, Writs of Habeas Corpus, by Virtue of which, the Commanders not daring to resist them, the impressed Seamen were brought from the Kings ships and Sett at Liberty by Law, the Kings Commanders not daring to disobey the Kings Writ. During the Administration of Adams, Mr Pickering knows what Remonstrances and Demands were made, and the Success of them while he was Secretary of State: and Mr Madison can Shew him, in the office of State what Representations were made and what Instructions were given to our Minister in London, while Chief Justice Marshall was Secretary of State; and Mr King can inform him, what Memorials he presented to the British Court, upon this Subject, in conformity to his Instructions. The Instructions and Memorials were drawn in as Strong terms as the English Language could furnish. Mr Pickering himself could not have employed Stronger Sentiments or Expressions; nor could any other Writer without violating that Respect and Decorum, which ought always to be preserved between Nations and Governments, even in Declarations of War. The Practice and the Pretension were represented, not only as incompatible with every Principle of Justice and every feeling of Humanity, but as wholly irreconcile irreconcileable with all thoughts of a Continuance of Peace and Friendship between the two Nations. Mr King can tell the Effect and Success of his Memorial. It was an immediate order to all the Commanders of the Navy, to liberate and discharge, the demanded Men, that is all impressed American Seamen. I Shall Say nothing of Mr Jeffersons Administration, because the Negotiations already made public Sufficiently Shew what he has done.\nDuring all this time a Claim of Right was never Sett up. Excuses and Apologies were made, and Necessity was Sometimes Sett u hinted: but a Serious Pretension of Right, was never advanced.\u2014No: The first formal Claim was the Kings Proclamation. With what Propriety then? with what decency? can Mr Pickering call this a Right claimed and exercised for Ages, and during the whole of the Administrations of Washington, of Adams and of Jefferson?", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5237", "content": "Title: Review of James Hillhouse, Propositions, 12 April 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: \nDraught of a Review of an Amendment of J. A. Hillhouse, to the Constitution of the United States, proposed in the Senate in 1808. Incomplete and never published.post 12 April 1808\nReview\nPropositions for amending the Constitution of the United States, Submitted by Mr Hillhouse to the Senate, on the twelfth day of April 1808, with his explanatory Remarks.\nIn Pages five and Six, Mr Hillhouse defines his Terms, Monarchy, Aristocracy, Democracy, Federalists and Republicans. To his Idea of Aristocracy alone, Shall We make any objection, at present: but before We State our grounds of dissent, even from that, We must take notice of what he Says at the bottom of page 6.\n\u201cSome of the important Features of our Constitution, were borrowed from a Model which did not very well Suit our condition; I mean the Constitution and Government of England, a mixed Monarchy, in which Monarchy, Aristocracy and Democracy are so combined as to form a check on each other. One important and indispensable requisite of Such a Government is that the two first branches Should be hereditary.\u201d\nWould it not have been more conformable to the Fact, to have Said that these important Features of our Constitution, were borrowed from our own colonial Constitutions? Every Colony on the Continent, except Pensylvania, had a Governor, a Council, or Senate, and an House of Representatives. The Governors were not hereditary: the Counsellors were not hereditary. Some of the Governors were chosen by the People So were some of the Councils and these States, contented with their original form of Government have undergone no change. Some were appointed by a King in Europe, but commonly changed, upon an Average in less than Seven Years. These Features were borrowed from the Constitution of England, leaving out the hereditary quality, and they So well Suited the Condition of our Ancestors that they not only lived hapily under them, but founded a respectable and flourishing Nation and died contented. There is little difference between our present Governments, and those under which our Ancestors emigrated, lived and died excepting that their Governors and Senators in Some Instances were appointed from abroad, and our Governors and Presidents are chosen by ourselves. It would grieve to Say, that We Shew the Executive Authorities of our own choice and our own blood, less respect than our Ancestors paid to those who were Foreigners and appointed by a King. Governments therefore may be mixed and compounded of Monarchical, Aristocratical and Democratical Ingredients, without one particle of hereditary Power or Priviledge, in them, except the common Priviledges of the People, Such as their hereditary Lands Goods and Liberties. In Such an Empire as the British Some People may perhaps Suppose that it is necessary that the Executive Authority and the Senate Should be hereditary: because Elections to those Powers would corrupt the Nation and produce a civil War and a military Despotism at the first Tryal. As this is a Point in which We have no immediate Interest We need not form any Opinion or Conjectures concerning it. But We may Say with confidence, that in a Course of more than twenty years, We have not experienced Such Effects among Us.\nPropositions for amending the Constitutions of the United States, Submitted by Mr Hillhouse to the Senate, on the twelfth day of April 1808, with his explanatory Remarks.\nReview.\nWhen a Speech or a Pamphlet appears in Public from the Press, the most rational Course would be to read it, and judge of its Merits, with out prejudice. But Republican Jealousy is so much the Spirit of the times that the first question is who is the Author,? of what party is he? what are his motives? and whose Election is he aiming to promote? This inquisitive temper has been Sufficiently alive, concerning this the Publication of Mr Hillhouse. Some have conjectured that his design was to throw the Nation into confusion, in hopes that a better order than prevails at present, might in time arise out of it. Others have Suggested that this Work is a burlesque on the crude project of Amendment, which appear in Such numbers. One Sett of Men have Suspected that this Gentleman has been So long in publick Business and been So much disappointed, growing becoming yearly of less and less Influence and at present finding himself in a Minority consisting at most of three or four in the Senate, he is grown impatient, and determined at any rate to make himself a Name and increase his Importance.\nI Shall leave these uncandid Insinuations to those who delight in them: and take it for granted that Mr Hillhouse was Sincere, that he honestly believes what he Says and proposes his Amendments for the public good. It Shall be my Endeavour to be as concise as possible in a few observations, which I hope may Shew in a clear light the Merit of the Work.\nIn Pages 5 and 6. Mr Hillhouse defines his Terms Monarchy Aristocracy and Democracy, Federalists and Republicans. I shall make no Objection to any Thing here but his Idea of Aristocracy. But before We come to that, We must take Notice of what he Says at the bottom of p. 6.\n\u201cSome of the important features of our Constitution were borrowed from a Model which did not very well Suit our Condition; I mean the Constitution and Government of England, a mixed Monarchy in which Monarchy, Aristocracy and Democracy are So combined as to form a Check on each other. One important and indispensable requisite of Such a Government is that the two first Branches Should be hereditary.\u201d\nWould it not have been more conformable to the fact, to have Said that \u201cthese important Features of our Constitution were borrowed from from our own Colonial Constitutions.\u201d Every Colony on the Continent, except Pensilvania, has a Governor, a Council or Senate, and a House of Representatives. The Governors were not hereditary, the Councillors were not hereditary. Some of the Governors were chosen by the People, and So were Some of the Councils. Some were appointed by the King, but commonly changed, upon an Average in less than Seven years. There is little difference between our present Governments and those under which our Ancestors emigrated lived and died, after having founded a respectable and flourishing Nation, died; excepting that their Governors were appointed from abroad and our President and Governors are chosen by ourselves. I am Sorry to add that We Shew the Executives of our own Choice and own blood infinitely less respect than our Ancestors did those who were foreigners and appointed by a King. Governments therefore may be mixed, and compounded of Monarchical, Aristocratical and Democratical Ingredients, without one Particle of hereditary Power or Priviledge in them, except the common Priviledges of the People, Such as their hereditary Lands Goods and Liberties. Say, if you will that in Such a Nation as an Empire of the as the British, it is necessary that the Executive and Senate Should be hereditary: because Elections to those Powers would totally corrupt the Nation and produce a Civil War and a military Despotism at the first Tryal. But in an Experiment of twenty years, We have not yet found Such dangers among Us. In Page 39 and forty, Mr Hillhouse observes that \u201cto form an Aristocracy hereditary Succession is indispensible.\u201d In this But Mr Hillhouse is mistaken. Holland was an Aristocracy But the Burgomasters, Pensionaries Councillors And Schopens in whom the Sovereignty resided were not hereditary. There is a Small Number of Nobles, in the Legislature of each State, but this body has but one Vote; every City has an equal Vote with the whole body of Nobles, and in critical times they have no Influence. Berne was an Aristocracy. But the Members of the Grand Council were not hereditary but elective. There were Six Noble Families, but they had no Prerogatives but mere Preceedency. And those were not Councillors unless elected into a Legislature of two hundred and Ninety nine Members Councillors and Assessors.\nIn Short hereditary Powers and peculiar Priviledges, enter in no into the Deffinition of Aristocracy. There may be an Aristocracy for Life or for years or for half a year or a Month or a Day. Infinite Art and Chicanery has have been employed in this Country to deceive the People in their Understanding of this term Aristocracy as well as the Well born, as if Aristocracy could not exist without hereditary Power and exclusive Priviledge and as if a Man could not be well born without being an hereditary Nobleman and a Peer of a Realm. Chancellor Livingston inherited a Name, numerous and wealthy Family Connections and a fine Manor. These are all hereditary Priviledges and have given him more Influence in this Country than all the Titles and immens landed Estates, of the Duke of Norfolk, with all the hereditary Titles and Seat in the House of Lords have given him in England. Mr John Randolph inherited his name, Family Connections, his fine plantations and thousand Negroes, which have given him more power in this Country than the Duke of Bedford has in England and more than he would have if he possessed all the brilliant Wit th fine Imagination and flowing Eloquence of the young that celebrated Virginian. Were not then Mr Livingston and Mr Randolph well born? The State of Connecticutt has always been governed by an Aristocracy more decisively than the Empire of Great Britain is. Mr Hillhouse well knows that half a dozen or at most a dozen Families have governed that State Country when a Colony as well as Since it has been a State. An Aristocracy can govern the Elections of the People, better without hereditary legal Dignities, Priviledges and Powers, better than with them.\nIn the Massachusetts many of our prime Quality were banished in the Revolution. Most of our present Rulers are new Men. But these have been promoted by an Aristocracy. Mr Hillhouse Says \u201cThe United States do not possess the Materials for forming an Aristocracy.\u201d But We do possess one Material, which actually constitutes an Aristocracy, that governs the Nation. That Material is Wealth. Talents, Birth, Virtues, Services, Sacrifices are of little consideration with Us. The Greatest Talents, the brightest Virtues the most important Services, are thrown aside as Useless unless they are Supported by Riches or Parties, and the object of both Parties is chiefly wealth. When the rich observe a young Man, and See he has Talents to Serve their Party, they court and employ him, but if he deviates from their Line, let him have a care. He will Soon be discarded. In the Roman History We See a Constant Struggle between the Rich and the Poor, from Romulus to C\u00e6sar. The great Division was not So much between Patricians and Plebeians, as between Debtor and Creditor. Speculation and Usury kept the State in perpetual Broils. The Patricians usurped the Lands and the Plebeians demanded Agrarian Laws. The Patricians lent Money at exorbitant Interest and the Plebeians were Sometimes unable and always unwilling to pay it. These were the Causes of dividing the People into two Parties as distinct and jealous and almost as hostile to each other as two Nations. Let Mr Hillhouse Say whether We have not two Parties in this Country Springing from the Same Sources? Whether a Rage Spirit for Speculation in Land has not always existed in this Country, from the Days of William Pen and even long before? Whether this Spirit has not become a Rage from Georgia to New Hampshire, within the last thirty years? Whether foundations have not been laid for immense fortunes in a few families for their Posterity? Whether the Variations of a fluctuating Medium, and an unsteady public faith, have not raised vast fortunes in personal Property in Banks in Commerce, in Roads, Bridges &c? Whether there are not distinctions arising from Corporations and Societies of all kinds, even those of Religion Science and Litterature? and whether the Professions of Law Physick and Divinity are not distinctions? Whether all these are not Materials for forming an Aristocracy that governs the Country? Whether they do not in fact constitute an Aristocracy, that governs the Country? On the other Side the common People, by which appellation I designate the Farmers, Tradesmen and Labourers, many of the Smaller Merchants and Shopkeepers, and even the unfortunate and necessitous who are obliged to fly into the Wilderness for a Subsistence, and all the Debtors, cannot See these inequalities with out Grief and Jealousy and Resentment. A Farmer or a Tradesman who cannot by his Utmost Industry and frugality in a Life of Seventy years do more that Support a moderate family and lay up four or five thousand dollars must think it very hard, when he Sees these vast fortunes made per Saltum; these Mushrooms growing up in a Night, and they throw themselves naturally into the arms of a Party whose professed object is to oppose the other Party.\nTwo Such Parties, therefore allways will exist, as they always have existed in all Nations, especially in Such as have property, and most of all in commercial Countries. Each of these Parties must be represented in the Legislature, and they must be checks on each other. But without a Mediator between them, they will oppose each other in all Things and go to War, till one Subjugates the other. The Executive Authority is the only Mediator that can maintain Peace between them.\nMr Hillhouse thinks \u201cWe have not the means of making an Aristocratical Branch to our Government.\u201d I think We have the means and that We have in Fact an Aristocratical Branch to our Government and that is the Senate: and a very useful, honourable and necessary Branch it is: but it would be more Usefull and more Safe, if every Particle of executive Power was taken away from it. There are materials in great plenty, out of which to form this Aristocratical Branch. Mercuries ought not indeed to be Sculptured out of every kind of Wood. But there are Gentlemen of Fortune Talents Experience and Integrity in every State out of whom the Legislatures may Select the most eminent, and So they might if the Number of Senators in Congress was doubled, as I wish it was and hope it will be. These would compose an Aristocratical Branch as respectable as any in the World. Our Senate for twenty years has been very well chosen and has abounded with able and excellent Men. How Mr Hillhouse can be at a loss for means of making an Aristocratical Branch, I know not. Our Senators are not hereditary nor have they any exclusive Priviledges, nor are these necessary, as long as We have not an hereditary Executive, nor is an hereditary Executive necessary as long as We have not an hereditary Senate. When one is So the other must be, or it will be no Check.\nIt is to no purpose to declaim against \u201cDemagogues.\u201d There are as many and as dangerous Aristocratical Demagues, as there are democratical. Neither Party will get any thing by such invectives. Sylla and Pompey were as arrant Aristocratical Demagues as Marius and C\u00e6sar or even Cataline were democratical ones. Sylla was more cruel than Marius, and Pompey had less humanity than C\u00e6sar. Even Cicero and Brutus the honestest Men in Rome were but Aristocratical Demagues: and Milo was as much an Agitator for the Senate Patricians as Cladius for the Plebeians and Hamilton was as much a Demagogue as Burr. An independent Executive to mediate between the two Parties, was wanting, and this defect was the ruin of the Republic, and will be of ours if Mr Hillhouses motion prevails. When Mr Hillhouse, declares, that \u201cWhen a Citizen claims to be an Exclusive Patriot, and is very officious in proclaiming his own Merit, it is time for the People to be allarmed.\u201d I agree with him. But I must Add When a Senator declaims against Executive Influence, under our Constitution, it is time for the People to be upon their guard against an Aristocratical Spirit and Preponderance.\nPage 41 and 42 Mr Hillhouse Says \u201cthere is always Such a Spirit of Jealousy existing between Aristocracy and Democracy, and between Monarchy and Democracy, they cannot long exist together without a third ballancing Power; Mr Hillhouse should have added an equal Jealousy between Aristocracy and Monarchy, and then I Should agree with have agreed with him. But this last Jealousy it was not convenient for Mr Hillhouse to acknowledge. Mr Hillhouse Says \u201cas well might a Man take up his abode in a Tygers Den, as Aristocracy with Democracy, unless protected by the Strong Arm of Monarchy.\u201d And I Say as well might a Man take up his abode with Shadrach Meshach and Abelnego in the fiery furnace, as Democracy with Aristocracy without the Strong Arm of Monarchy to protect it. Witness the thirty Tyrants of Athens and the Decemvirs at Rome and every other instance Since the Creation in which Democracy has been in the Power of Aristocracy. I Say farther, that as well might a Man take up his abode with Daniel in the Lyons Den as Monarchy with Aristocracy, without the Million Arms of Democracy to defend it. All these Jealousies exist in Some degree, but the greatest Jealousy of all is that of Aristocracy against Monarchy. Aristocracy is the natural Enemy of Monarchy; and Monarchy and Democracy are the natural allies against it, and they have always felt the Necessity of Uniting against it, Sooner or later. Hence the Ultimate Destruction of all Republicks. The Aristocracy would not Suffer the Executive to have Power to defend the Constitution, to defend itself or to defend the People. The Aristocracy has oppressed the People, and the Executive, till the People, out of all Patience, have given the Aristocracy and themselves too a Master. As to \u201cSurrounding the Throne by a powerfull Aristocracy,\u201d they have allways proved to be pretorian Guards and cutt off the head of their General, when the Discipline of the Laws has by any Calamity been weakened. It is true when the People have been Seditious and rebellious against them their Property Priviledges and distinctions, they have united with the Executives to defend themselves. Like Fire they are good Servants but all consuming Masters.\nLittle need be Said on Shortening the Period of the Elections of the two houses. This instead of diminishing the Spirit of Party will only increase and inflame it. There will be no time for it to cool. The causes of the two Parties, I have already shown to be permanent and unanswerable unchangeable. Both must be represented in the Legislature, and there must be a Mediator between them in the Executive. This must have Power for the Purpose. He must calm and restrain the ardor of both and be more impartial between them than any President ever yet has been. And the Senators themselves must not constrain him to be partial as they So often have done. They Power to do it instead of being increased as Mr Hillhouse proposes ought to be wholly taken from them. They ought to have nothing to do with Executive Power. If Mr. Hillhouse should carry this point, and the People instead of being glutted and satiated with Elections Should wish to double the Number, I hope he will introduce that Admirable Aristocratical Invention of Connecticut, a Nomination List, that every Thing may not depend upon the Election fever, the Ictus febrile of one Election day.\nThe Sixth Article of Mr Hillhouse\u2019s Amendments reduces the Presidents office to a mere Doge of Venice, a mere head of Wood, a mere tool of the Aristocracy of the Country. He is to be appointed by Chance, from the most Aristocratical Branch, the Senate. Although the Senators in general have been respectable Men and Some of them illustrious for Virtues Talents, Experience and Services, Yet it must be confessed that there have been very weak Men in that Body. These will have as good a Chance as the best, a Blount or a Burr as good a Chance as an Elsworth or a Strong or a Richard Henry Lee: But this is of less importance, than the Proposal to Submit all Nominations and Removals to the Senate and House of Representatives. There never was and never can be a more Project more perfectly Aristocratical than this.\nMr Hillhouse informs Us that \u201cMan is fond of Power. True; but is not Man, in the Shape of a Senator, or a Representative, as fond of Power as a President? Mr Hillhouse also admonishes Us, that Ambition and Favouritism, (and he Should have Added avarice, Jealousy Envy hatred Love and Lust) are evils to be guarded against, in a Republican Government.\u201d True again, but are not Ambition and favouritism and every other vicious Passion and Sinister Interest as Strong and active in a Senator or a Representative as in a President? Cannot indeed the Members of the Legislature conceal, their private Views and improper motives more easily than a President? Every Senator and every Representative has in his own district Friends and Favourites, to whose Esteem Affection and Activity and Influence, he has been indebted for his Election. Is it not natural that his mutual Esteem Affection and Gratitude, to these Friends Should excite him to exert himself in Obtaining favours and offices and Employments for them? Mr Hillhouse probably knows that great Pains have Sometimes been taken by Senators and Representatives too to obtain Nominations to Offices, Sometimes for themselves and Sometimes for their Favourites, Sometimes with Success and Sometimes without. Again; has Mr Hillhouse never known Combinations and consultations between General Officers, Heads of Departments, leading Members of the Senate, and House of Representatives, I will not Say to overawe, but to influence the President in favour of Some Appointments and against others. Has he never known Such Combinations resisted and Nominations made in opposition to them all. I Say Such Instances have been, and Such Nominations have proved the most fortunate important and Successful of any that were ever made under the Constitution. Has Mr Hillhouse never known Combinations and Committees of Senators Sent to the President to remonstrate privately against Nominations, and when they could not prevail, have they not obtained Majorities in Senate to Negative Such Nominations? Mr Hillhouse has known Favouritisms and Antifavouritisms enough in both houses, I Should think to be convinced, that Favouritism would be increased by his Project, at least one hundred and fifty fold.\nLet Us now consider how Mr Hillhouses Project would operate. The President Sends a Nomination to the Senate. Probably the Person named has been Selected by the President out of twenty Candidates who have been previously recommended to him by Some Senator and Some Representative. Nineteen Senators are of Course disappointed, because their favourites have been Sett aside. These nineteen will then combine together to negative the present Nomination in hopes that their favourites will have a better chance at the next time. There is to be no debate. How is this possible. Members are to give Information, and information may be Sent in from abroad by Petition or Remonstrance. Vices, Follies Crimes, Incapacity may be alledged, and contradicted. How can these questions be determined but by Witnesses, and how can false Witnesses be counteracted but by Confrontation. And after all the favourite Member of the Senate by Intrigue Artifice or Eloquence, out of Door will carry his Candidate. After this it must go down to the House of Representatives, and what will happen there? The Member who has previously recommended him to the President, will rise and give him a Character. Twenty other Members perhaps a hundred, who have recommended another Man or other Men will be disappointed. Sins and Crimes and disqualifications may be alledged against the Nomination. The Subject will be postponed for days or Weeks. In the mean time Caucus\u2019s will be held of evenings, combinations will be formed, and the Favourite Members of the House will carry their favourites.\nBut Removals from office too must be laid before both Houses. The Mischiefs and Inconveniences of this would be greater, if possible than the other. The officers of the Army Navy and Revennue are necessarily numerous. Complaints and Accusations often occur. These must be laid before Congress, Witnesses must be Summoned, examined and cross examined. Council would be humbly requested. It would be Inhumanity to refuse it. Parties, Cabals and Caucuses would be formed, and Corruption introduced in a thousand Shapes. Those who had favourites gaping for the place would be tempted too Slightly to vote for Removal, and those who had no Such favourites to gratify would be too tender. The year would be too Short for both Houses to go through with all these appointments and Removals. Again how is military Discipline to be maintained in your Army and Navy. How is the Subordination of the Military to the civil Power to be Supported. Give your General an Estate for Life in his office defeasible only on the Vote of the two Houses and he will Soon be Master of your President. He will Soon have ten times as much influence in the Nation. + See the Sheet A.\nNo. The real fault is that the President is has not influence enough and is not independent enough. Parties will not allow him to act himself. For twelve years one Party prevailed, and that Party would not allow their Presidents to be impartial. The other Party has now prevailed Eight years, and they have not permitted their President in many Instances to Act his own Judgment. The Power of Removal was never abused in the first twelve years, except in the two Cases of Gardner and Whipple at Portsmouth, except perhaps in 2 Instances and those Removals were made at the earnest and repeated Solicitations of all the Members of the House and one of the Members of the Senate from New Hampshire, a State much against the Inclination of the President. Representations of Misconduct in office were made And probably credited by the Members of Congress to the President: they But there is now reason to Suspect that they were dictated by too much of a Party Spirit.\nIn Short Presidents must break asunder their leading Strings and the People must Support them in it. They must unite the two Parties instead of inflaming their Divisions. They must look out for Merit wherever they can find it, and Talents and Integrity must be a Recommendation to Office wherever they are Seen, though differing in Sentiments from the President and in an opposite Party to that whose little Predominance brought him into Power.\nPeople of the United States. You knew not half the Solicitude of your Presidents for your Happiness and Welfare, nor an hundredth part of the Obstructions and Embarrassments they must endure from Intrigues of Individuals of both Parties. You must Support them in their Independence, and turn a deaf Ear to all the false Charges against them. But if you Suffer them to be overawed and Shackled in the Exercise of their constitutional Powers, either by Aristocratical or Democratical Maneuvres, you will Soon repent of it, in bitter anguish. Anarchy and civil War cannot be far off.\u2014Whereas by a Steady Support of the Independence of the Presidents office your Liberties and happiness will be Safe, in defyance of all foreign Influence french or English, and of all popular commotion and Aristocratical Intrigue.\nThe Proposal of diminishing the Presidents Salary to fifteen thousand dollars is so mean a thought that it Scarcely deserves to be mentioned. If the present Compensation is too high for Seven or Eight Millions of industrious People possessing a very fertile and productive Agricultural Country and the Second Commerce in the Universe, to Support a President who represents their Majesty and must Support their Dignity in the Eyes of all Nations and People, let it be diminished by an Amendment of the Constitution as it is, without making the President a mere painted head of a Ship made of Wood, and incapable of being Helmsman or Pilot.\nSheet A.\n+Sheet third page 3d. To illustrate this Subject Still farther, recollect the Instances already recorded. In the Case of Blount, a conspiracy was fully proved, to dismember the Empire and carry off an immense portion of it, to a foreign Dominion. Yet how much time was consumed and how much debate excited, before that important Subject could be decided? And the accused Person, with all his guilt upon his head, was finally Suffered to escape with impunity. In the Case of Judge Pickering although his Incapacity to discharge the Functions of his office, were indisputable, and although Incapacity and Non User are a legal forfeiture of a Judicial office; Yet it is well remembered how much time was necessarily employed in the Investigation of the Law and the Evidence and how much the Judges House and the Senate were divided in opinions on the final decision. In the Case of Judge Chace, the time the Expence, and the public anxiety of his Impeachment and Tryal are well known, and how much Exertion of the ablest and best Men in the Legislature, as well as of the Counsell were requisite to safe save a great and upright Judge from unmerited Ignominy, disgrace and Ruin. In the more recent Case of Mr John Smith of Ohio, what a vast Expence of time and Money and travel what Numbers of Witnesses, what intricate questions of Law as well collisions of testimony, occurred, and how critical was the final determination upon his Innocence? In the Case of General Wilkinson the Complication of Law and fact, the length of time through the whole of which his conduct is to be examined, the Number of Witnesses, the various parts of the Union from whence they must be collected, the conflicts of Parties, the great legal and political questions which arise and the vast importance to the Public as well as the Individual, are all, to be taken into Consideration. The time already passed in this Inquiry is very great and how much longer it will continue to irritate and inflame the Public and divide the Nation no Man can conjecture. The Case of Colonel Burr is the most remarkable of all. If this was to be tryed first in the Senate and then in the House of Representatives, when would it have an End and who can pretend to divine what would be the decision?\nNow every Custom House officer every Judge and every Marshall every offi and Every Attorney General and District Attorney, every Secretary of State, Treasury, War or Navy, and every Officer of the Army or Navy, every Post Master General or particular, would have as fair a right to a public and impartial Tryal, as a Judge of the Supream Court upon an Impeachment. In Tryals of Law the Jurors cannot be Solicited, but the Solicitations of Members of Congress from Culprits and their Friends would be infinite, and where Guilt or innocence is to be determined by a Single Vote in one hundred and fifty, as would often happen, if a corrupt Member could be found, a Bribe not would not Seldom be offered. Especially in cases where foreign Interests and Intrigues could intervene. This is the System Mr Hillhouse would introduce. It may without Scruple be pronounced, though Mr Hillhouse certainly did not See it in that Light, the most corrupt Project that ever was conceived by a Man of Sense and Virtue. The endless confusion and distraction that would arise from it, would be as certain as its Injustice, Inhumanity and Corruption.\nThe Appointment and Removal of Ambassadors, and foreign Ministers and Consuls, as well as Judges, and General\u2013Officers and Admirals would take the whole year, and convulse the whole Continent. Take away from the President the Nominations to these offices, and give it to every Member of the Senate and House, and how many Nominations would there be to every Vacancy. The Disputes would be endless between the North and the South the East and the West; one State would have more than its proportion, and others less. The Question would be more concerning the Abode of the Candidate and less concerning the Talents Qualifications and Merits, than ever it has been yet, and it has already and always been more So than it ought to have been for the public Good. The Members of the House of Representatives are so numerous, and often So young and inexperienced that they must vote for Men, nine times in ten, of whom they know nothing, not even by common fame and as often will be incompetent to judge of the appropriate qualifications for the office.\nThe old Congress was a Small Body of Men in comparison of the present\u2014two Branches and their deliberations were always in Secret. Yet if there is any body living who was present and knew the Contests about on the appointment of General officers and foreign Ministers, let him recollect the Disputes about Dr Franklin Silas Deane and Arthur and William Lee, Mr Izard, Mr Williams Mr Morris, Commodore Jones Captain Landais and Lt Simpson General Lincoln General Arnold, General Worcester, Commodore Hopkins and many others, nay even concerning General Washington General Ward General Lee, General Schuyler and General Gates &c and he must remember that Congress was torn to Pieces by these disputes, and that days and months and years were wasted in Such Controversies to the inexpressible Injury of the Service. To these Causes are to be attributed the Wants of the Army, the distresses of General Washington, the Loss of Canada, after We had conquered all but Quebec, the Loss of the Penobscutt Enterprize and almost all the Disasters of the War. The Complaints against General officers, the Financier, and his Agents and especially against Foreign Ministers were as perpetual and endless as the debates in Congress, not to say intrigues, to the delay and Neglect of the most essential Measures for the Support and Supply of the Army, and the Navy.\nB\nIn p. 27. and in pages 47. 48 and forty nine, Mr Hillhouse is very anxious, and with great reason, about Party Spirit: he calls it a Demon and a Fiend, by a Figure which is natural enough for indeed it is\nA Monster of So frightfull mien\nAs to be hated needs but to be Seen\nBut how Shall this Monster be chained? How Shall this foul Fiend be exorcised? Sermons, orations Speeches Pamphets, odes, Hymns and Heroic Poems, have been long enough tried to no Purpose. Homer Milton and Spencer whose immortal Poems were all written expressly to Shew the dreadful Effects of Party Spirit and Discord among Aristocrats Chiefs and the passions of Envy Jealousy Ambition and Revenge from whence they Spring: have been as little heeded as Mr Hillhouse and his humble Reviewer will be. It is a Devil I believe that will not be cast out even by fasting and Prayer. It was turned out of Paradise with the first Pair, and immediately made a Division in their Family, and produced a Dual or an Assassination between their two first Sons. From that Family it has descended, through all Successive generations to the present most enlightened and virtuous Age and Still produces Assassinations and Duels as frequently as ever. It inhabits all Climes, and under all forms of government, It prevails in Turkey and Persia, Morocco and Tripoli, as well as in France and England: and in every Tribe of Savages in Affrica and America as well as among the most enlightened People on Earth. There never existed three Men together, two of whom did not love one another better than either of them loved the third, and better than the third loved either of the two. If this fact is indubitable as I believe it is, it will necessarily follow, that three Men never lived together without a Party Spirit among them.\nIn Despotisms and Simple Monarchies, it is well known by what means the Monster is quelled: but in limited Monarchies and free Republicks, the conquest is attended with more difficulty. If Mr Hillhouse will run over in his thought all his Researches into History and the Science of Government, he will oblige the Public, by pointing out one Instance, in which Party Spirit has been confined within any bounds compatible with public Good and National Happiness but by a Counterpoise of Interests, Passions and Parties. Party Spirit confounds the distinctions between Truth and Falshood, Right and Wrong and corrupts the Moral Sense; there can be therefore no ultimate Remedy in any moral Principle or political Maxim, against its final and fatal Excesses. Nothing but Power lodged Somewhere in impartial hands, can ever moderate Soften or controul it.\nWhen Mr Hillhouse Says, that \u201cState or local Parties will have but a feeble Influence on the General Government\u201d I cannot comprehend him. Will not State Parties a State Party avail itself of the Influence of the general Government, to increase their its own influence at home, and to diminish that of its Rival? Will not a local Party request Mr Pickering, Mr Hillhouse and Mr Ely to write publick and private Letters, to Stimulate their own Friends, and disgrace their Antagonists? And will not the these opposite Party avail themselves of even a Letter from a Man of no Party, whose Conscience is not yet Seared with the red hot iron of Faction, to Support itself if it can? Will not both Parties cutt off at a Blow at present and after Sometime perhaps by a Proscription or a Guillotine, or a banishment to Cayenne or to Bottany bay, every Man who dares to vote or Speak or write from his Conscience and his honor? \u201cCurse ye Meroz, Curse ye Bitterly the Inhabitants thereof, because they came not up to the help of the Lord, to the help of the Lord against the Mighty,\u201d is the language of all Parties, and when it is infalibly known to be the cause of the Lord, it is just, but when it is the cause of mere faction, the Language Should be changed to cursed be the Anger for it was fierce and their Wrath for it was cruel. The Time is well remembered when Mr Madison, Mr Giles and Several other Members of Congress, finding themselves unable to elevate their Party in the Great Council of the Nation, resigned their Seats and became Members of their State Legislatures, in order to revolutionize the Primary Assemblies, influence the Elections to the General Government and overawe the national Measures. Mr Hillhouse, no doubt remembers The great Efforts, and among many others the Representations and Legislative Pamphlets against the Alien Law and Sedition Law. Mr Hillhouse must clearly See and readily acknowledge, that his Amendments will be no Remedy, against Such Party Spirit and Party Contrivances. Senators and Representatives of the National Government, and Ministers of State too will continue to resign, in order to increase their fame, to be made Governors at home and promote the Views of their Party and on the other hand Governors &c of States will resign, in order to be made Senators, Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, Judges &c and Presidents. As long as the State Governments retain their Sovereignty and that is their Legislatures, or in other Words as long as the national Government is in any Sense a Federative Republicke mutual Sympathies or mutual Antipathies will Subsist between them and the national Government: and there can never exist the Smallest Spirit of Party in one without producing a Sinister Spirit of Party in the other.\nThat there are \u201cregular, organized Parties, extending from the northern to the Southern Extremity, and from the Atlantic to the Western Limits of the United States\u201d is very true. And it is equally certain that there ever have been and ever Such, and that there ever will be Such unless you lay an Embargo, over all on all printing Presses private Letters, privates Clubbs, and on all travelling from one State to another. A Standing Army of an hundred thousand Men Infantry and another hundred thousand Cavalry, and twenty thousand Gun Boats will not effect it. Caucus\u2019s of Patricians, and Caucuses of Plebeians always prevailed in Rome, and in all other free Countries. Our Revolution was effected by Caucuses. The federal Constitution was formed by Caucuses and the federal Administrations for twenty years have been Supported or Subverted by Caucuses. There is little more of the kind now than there was twenty years ago. Alexander Hamilton was the greatest organist, that ever played upon this Instrument. He made all the Use he could of those Bodies of Cincinnati and others, to prevent Mr Adams from being chosen Vice President. The Reason of his Antipathy I know not, for he had never Seen him. He caused it to be propagated in the Northern States that Virginia would not vote for Washington, and in the Southern States that New England would not vote for Washington, at least that their Votes would not be unanimous: at the Same time that there was a great Probability there would be an unanimous Vote for Adams: that therefore the Elections must throw away So many of their Votes that Adams could not have a Majority, and consequently could not be President. At the Second Election, our perpetual Dictator permited Mr Adams If he believed one Word of the Apprehensions he propagated, it is very unaccountable: for there was a very great Certainty in the public opinion that Washington would have an unanimous Vote.\nAt the Second Election our perpetual Dictator, was graciously pleased to permit Mr Adams to have a considerable Majority as V. President.\nAt the third Election, he intrigued with all his might, to get Major Thomas Pinckney chosen President. He dared not attempt to exclude Mr Adams, because he knew that Such a project would defeat his plan: but his Scheme was to get a Vote or two more for Pinkney than for Adams, or at least an equal Number for each, in hopes that his intrigues in the House might prevail to have Pinkney preferred to Adams.\nAt the fourth Election, his Intrigues and Caucuses were more \u201cbold open and decided.\u201d Not only a Caucus of Members of Congress was assembled at Philadelphia, to exclude Mr Jefferson and turn him out, but to bring in General Pinckney with an equal Vote, with Mr Adams. This was given out as a point determined and the whole Continent pledged to it, upon their Sacred honor. In the mean time Hamilton prepared his famous Pamphlet, intending to keep it Secret, till the Election was passed, and then put it into the hands of the Members of the house, to decide the Election there in favour of Pinkney. Besides all this a Caucus of the Cincinnati was called at New York in which he was chosen President of that Society, but it was determined to Sacrify Adams, and even the two Clergymen President Dwight and Dr Hitcock, were found explicit, in the pious opinion, of Sacrificing Adams.\nNot Satisfied with all this, he made a Journey through New England to Boston and to Providence in prosecution of this patriotic design. In Boston I doubt not he found Some as patriotic as himself. In Rhode Island he was less Successful. He laboured with Governor Fenner to no purpose. Fenner would not Sacrifice Adams. The opposite Party had their Caucuses too, and Burr made as many Journeys and reasoned to greater Effect than Hamilton. The Republican Party had a Caucus in Boton in 1793 and wrote to Mr Jefferson, upon his Resignation of the Office of Secretary of State that if he would place himself at their head, they would choose him at the next Election, and, they organized their Party by their Correspondencies through the States.\nThis detail Sufficiently Shews that Caucuses have been from the Beginning. There is no doubt Some regard to public good, in the prosecution of these measures. They are considered as necessary. There is also Ambition, Avarice, Envy Jealousy and Revenge. As these causes good and bad, have hitherto produced Such Combinations, and as these Causes will continue to the End of the World, We may presume the Combinations will continue too. They have been perhaps too openly avowed and published in too dictatorial a Style: but they will continue, with more or less reserve. You cannot prevent them any more than you can prevent Gentlemen from conversing at their Lodgings.\nThe Question now is whether Mr Hillhouses Amendments of the Constitution will remedy or qualify the Evil? I think not. On the contrary it will aggravate the distemper and make it mutual. If the Government vibrates at present between Parties about once in twelve years, if you make the Elections annual, there will be a Chance of it vibrating every year, and you will have no Stability in Government at all. If that \u201cPrince of the Power of the air\u201d that \u201cFiend Party Spirit\u201d can now \u201cinvade every Sphere,\u201d if that D\u00e6mon can pass the bounds of every State\u201d and by will he be cast down to hurled headlong, flaming from the flaming etherial Sky to bottomless Perdition, there to dwell in adamantine Chains, when Elections become annual? Will Hamilton be prohibited from visiting Boston and Rhode Island and Burr from travelling in New Jersey and Pennsilvania? The Communication by Letters in the Post offices and by private hands will be as easy as ever, and mercenary Emissaries from the British and french Courts may write Speak and hold Caucuses as well as Federalists and Republicans, when Elections are annual as well as now, at this time when they are for four two years, for Six years and for four years. The Monster who now fremit ore cruento but can not gorge himself but more than once in Six years, will then have his appetite increased by being annually feasted. He will then be monthly and daily employed all the year round \u201cin Sowing discord and divisions destroying Social harmony, overturning the most valuable institutions and endangering the Liberties of our Country.\u201d\nIt is true that Parties have commenced in this Country, but that they are progressing with more gigantic Strides than Usual I know not. At every Election of Representatives, Senators and Presidents they have appeared, and the Nation was as much divided in 1787 1788 and 1789 as it is now. It was united in nothing but in the choice of Washington. When Mr Benson moved, that the blank, in the Bill directing what officer, Should hold the office of President in case of the death of the President and Vice President, Should be filled with the Chief Justice, meaning Mr Jay, Mr Madison instantly moved that it Should be filled with the Secretary of State, meaning Mr Jefferson. So fierce a Spirit of Party between the Friends of the two Rivals appeared all at once, that neither Side had the Courage to engage in the debate, the blank was never filled and the Bill was dropped. And both Parties have ever had a Successor in View from that time to this. Notwithstanding all the Ardour of popular Affection for Washington, and the great, I will not say unlimited confidence in him, Congress and the Nation were more divided during the Eight years of his Administration than they ever have been Since. The Senate in all constitutional questions and Subjects of foreign Relations were in most instances divided half and half. The federal Majority in the House of Representatives was very Small. During the Administration of his immediate Successor, The Federalists had a Majority of two thirds in the Senate, and a larger Majority in the House, than at any Period of the first Eight years. This Appearance of Strength made them, or at least their great Leader Hamilton presumptuous, and proved their ruin. During the whole Administration of Mr Jefferson the Nation has been more united, and the Majorities in both Houses has been uniformly much greater than under either of his Predecessors. How then can it be Said that Parties are progressing with Gigantic Strides. It Should rather Seem that the Nation is advancing towards greater Unanimity. The next Election however of President will Shew whether Party Spirit or Unanimity is increasing. The belligerent Powers have indeed driven Us by their intemperate Measures into Circumstances of danger and distress which have increased the Anxiety of all Men of all Parties: but it does not yet appear that the Parties are more dangerous or allarming than they have been. A little time may decide: but however this may be, the question Still remains whether Mr Hillhouses Amendment will quell one Monster or propagate more and fiercer? Mr Hillhouse is for \u201ccutting off the head of the Demon\u201d I think he will find it the head of an Hydra and that an hundred heads will Sprout from the blood of the one excinded. \u201cWithout a head, no dangerous party can be formed, no Such Party can exist\u201d Says Mr Hillhouse. Indeed! Is it So?\u2014Perhaps it is. But Parties will find heads enough: an Oligarchy of heads, an Aristocracy of heads, a Democracy of heads: for the deepest Democracies always have heads. One would think that the ancient Experiment of cutting off the heads of the tallest Poppies had been tried often enough. Go into your field and Strike off the heads of all the tallest, and when you have gone over the whole ground, turn round and Survey the whole ground and you will find as many taller than others as ever, and you must cutt off every Plant but one, before you can Say there is no Poppy taller than another. One would think that the recent Example of France could not be So Soon forgotten. Mirabeau, Marat, Brissot, Danton Robespierre, were all heads cutt of in Succession, and all Succeeding heads were Saved only by having recourse to one head and one Arm in the Emperor Napoleon. The common Sense, and common feeling of Mankind operated in France after beholding the horrible Massacres of Aristocracy and Democracy, as it has done in all other nations, when these frantic parties have not been ballanced. If you cutt off one head, three other heads at least, will Spring up in its Stead. The Aristocratical Party will have one head: The Democratical Party another: and the Quids a third; but the last will always be a Small feeble and insignificant Party. They will be Men of Candour, impartiality and Equity who will have no View but the public good: and this Party has unhappily in all times been very Small and feeble, in comparison with the other two Parties. That I may be more clearly understood, the Federal Party will have their head, their Leader, their Aristocracy and Democracy: The Republican Party will have their head and Leader, their Aristocracy and Democracy. The Quids will probably be too feeble and timid, finding themselves unsupported by either of the other great Parties and discountenanced by both, to fix upon any head: but if they should ever become a numerous Party, as has Seldom if ever happened, they must have an head, an Aristocracy and Democracy too: for no Party ever can exist without these three divisions.\nWe will Suppose then Mr Hillhouses Amendment adopted. The Divisions of rich and poor, debtor and Creditor will Still continue and produce a Federal and a Republican party in every State. All Appointments to office and Removals from it, will be in the Senate and House of the United States. These two Parties then in every State will live in a constant Struggle, which Shall Send the Representatives in to the Senate and house of the United States, and each will Strive to Send its head, that he may have the greatest Influence in determining national Measures and especially in appointing officers and bestowin favours to favourites. The Senate and House of the United States will thus be divided into federal and Republican Parties as much as they are now, and as all offices will be their Gift their whole time will be consumed in eternal intrigues and furious conflicts for the Loaves and Fishes. Each Party will have its head in each house, and even the Quids once in an Age may have their Leader too. Mr Hillhouse will find two or three heads in the Senate as many in the House, and this have Six heads to cutt off after he has cutt of one: and then he will instantly find Six more Shoot up in their Stead, in the Persons next esteemed in their respective Parties. The Caucuses in each State and correspondencies, between different StatesB. 3.will not be lessened, there will Still be central Committees, and Committees of Correspondence, from the North to the South and from the East to the West. As long as Education Talents, Property, or even Beauty or Stature or colour Shall make inequalities among Mankind, there will be an Aristocratical and a Democratical and a minor Party in every Country especially in oppulent commercial Countries. Mr Hillhouses Amendments instead of diminishing will increase them: instead of moderating will inflame, them: instead of reducing them to order, will throw them into greater confusion, and exasperate their passions and multiply their Intrigues without end. For Example an eminent Judge or a learned Lawyer in Connecticut or Massachusetts or any other State may wish to be a Judge or a Chief Justice of the United States, or his Friends and Admirers may desire to promote him. If he is really of no Party, neither Party will promote him. If he is of the Federal Party, the leading Members of the Senate and House of the United States will be Solicited by Letters, throughout the Union to exert their influence to obtain his Election. If he is of the Republican Party, the heads of that Party in congress will be instigated in the Same manner to obtain his Election: and there will be always a Federal Judge and a Republican Judge, and perhaps Such a pair in every State, contending intriguing and lyeing perhaps in the Newspapers: and how shall Congress judge? If federalism has a Majority in the Senate and House, a Federalist will be chosen: if Republicanism predominates a Republican will undoubtedly be elected. But what if Republicanism Should prevail in the House and Federalism in the Senate? A case that may often happen. What is to be done then? Why, No Appointment can be made.\nAgain: a Gentleman of Talents Education, Fortune, Family, aspires to visit foreign Countries in the Capacity of an Ambassador. He will certainly have one name or another: he must be either Federalist, Republican or Quid. If the latter he must Stay at home the first he will have all the Federalists in his State for him: if the Second all the Republicans: if the third he must Stay at home at his Farm Merchandize or Books. Central Committees and organized Correspondences, will be at work, in recommending him to their respective parties through the Union. When the Choice comes before Congress perhaps, a Candidate or two of each Party in each State will be nominated and after Weeks of debate in public and Intrigues and Caucuses in private an Ambassador may be chosen unless either house Should be equally divided as they were between Jefferson and Burr and then no Ambassador can be Sent, though Peace or War may depend upon the Mission. But in every case the Ambassador will be of the party that outnumbers the other in Congress.\nBut of all Party Contensions the Choice of a Commander in Chief of the Army will be the Sharpest, because a Commander in Chief of the Army in time of War will be a more popular and powerful Man than a President is now. What will become of your come by chance President if he presumes to dispute any Point with your General, who has ten thousand officers and twenty thousand Soldiers under him drawn from all parts attached to his Person and trumpetting his fame through the Union, and all espousing his opinions and Reputation against the President?\nWhen Such an office is to be filled, all the Militia officers All the old Soldiers all the Societies of the Cincinnati will be Sett in Motion; and for what I know all the religious Sects, the Catholicks the Protestant Episcopalians, the Anabaptists, even the Presbyterian assemblies and Conventions and even the Quaker Meetings may interest themselves in the Choice. And after all it must be a Federalist or a Republican who will carry the day. As one Party will always rather lean to France and the other to England, foreign Emissaries will certainly not be idle, and if a hand can be found to receive a bribe, We certainly know that both Courts are in the habit of employing money in other Countries.\nWe might go through the List of all offices under the general Government and all Elections would be made upon the Same general Principles.\nAnarchy Confusion and every evil Work, besides a total depravation of Morals and honest public Principles, would be the unavoidable Effect.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5238", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 18 April 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Rush, Benjamin\nDear Rush\nQuincy April 18. 1808.\nI have your favour of the 5th. My dear Mrs Adams bids me present her friendly regards to you and Mrs Rush and all your family, and to say to you that she has read your Letter with pleasure excepting what relates to a Gentleman from whom she had before a great Esteem, and all she can Say upon that Subject is that she wished she had not read it.\nIn my jocular prayer to the Saint I meant No reflection or insinuation against your Church or any other.\nI Shall esteem you the more for having become a Christian on a large Scale. Bigotry superstition and Enthusiasm on religious subjects I have long Since Sett at Defyance. I have attended public Worship in all Countries and with all Sects and believe them all much better than no religion, though I have not thought myself obliged to believe all I heard. Religion I hold to be essential to Morals; I never read of an irreligious Character in Greek or Roman History, nor in any other History, nor have I known one in Life, who was not a Rascal. Name one if you can living or dead. I shall be very glad to receive your Creed, as you give me Encouragement to hope.\nYou have heard the mercantile Maxim \u201cIf it is necessary in the Course of commerce to send a ship through the fire, you must run the risque of burning your Sails.\u201d Not all the Politicians of the World, the Pharasees, the Jesuits, the Bramins the Druids, the Romans The Carthaginians the Britons or the French, have ever employed more Subtilty in Negotion than Merchants. We may depend upon it that every device that human Wit can conceive will be employed to evade the Embargo\u2014The 37 Cargoes of Flour at the Havanna therefore are no Surprize to me. I fear that a practice and habit of Smuggling too, will be introduced by this irksome Stagnation.\nTell Mrs Rush, that Mrs A. and Mr A. felicitate themselves in Retirement but not much for that retirement. We have both, been enough at Sea to know that the Midshipmen and even the Passengers and common Sailors in a leaky crazy ship in a Storm Hurricane in the Gulph Stream, are as anxious as the Captain and the Helmsman. The higher Duty and the greater Vigilance and Activity, are a relief from terror, rather than an increase of it. I know not that I was ever more attentive to public affairs, or more concerned about them. You and I have been deceived in conceiving too high an opinion of the Sense and Honesty of our Nation. We are driven up in a Corner, can retreat no farther. Bayonetts and Cannons mouths are at our Bosoms. We are insulted and injured, ridiculed and Scorned by the Belligerent Powers. We have no Defence prepared by Sea and Land: and all this because Tench Coxe and a few other foolish Knaves like him would have it so, and the People would say Amen.\nMr Jefferson has reason to reflect upon himself. How he will get rid of his Remorse in his Retirement I know not. He must know that he leaves the government infinitely worse than he found it and that from his own Error or Ignorance. I wish his Telescopes and Mathematical Instruments, however, may secure his Felicity. But If I have not mismeasured his Ambition, he will be uneasy, and the Sword will cutt away the Scabbard. As he has, however a good Taste for Letters and an ardent curiosity for Science, he may and I hope will find Amusement and consolation from them: for I have no resentment against him, though he has honoured and Salaried almost every Villain he could find who had been an Enemy to me.\nOur People will not Suffer the Constitution to operate According to its true Principles, Spirit and design. The Presidents office ought to mediate between the Rich and the Poor. But neither will have it so. Each Party will have the Executive, and Judiciary too wholly and exclusively to itself. The Consequence has been and will be that our Government is a Game at Leap frog. Once in a dozen years there will be a Revolution in Administration. The Democrats will reign for about that Period, and make the President their Slave, then the Aristocrats will leap over their backs and Shoulders, and reign in their turn making the President their Machine. I think instead of opposing Systematically any Administration, running down their Characters and opposing all their Measures right or wrong, We ought to Support every Administration as far as We can in Justice. For my Part I always thought and am Still determined to Support every Administration whenever I think them in the right. I care not whether they call me Federalist, Jacobin or Quid.\nThat elegant Monument which your Friendship has erected to the Memory of Dr Redman has given much pleasure to your / Friend and Servant\n P. S. I have omitted to answer your close question, \u201cWhether Such a Country is worthy of the Patriotism of honest Men? I answer, Such a Country is as worthy as any other Country. Our People are like other People. Our Obligations to our Country never cease but with our Lives. We ought to do all We can. Instead of being Frenchmen or Englishmen; Federalists or Republicans, Jacobins, We ought to be Americans and exert every Nerve to convince and persuade our Country to conquer its Sordid Stinginess, to defend our exposed Cities and prepare a Naval Force. This must be our ultimate resort. The miserable struggle for place and power, must be laid aside, and heart and hand united for defence.The Judgments of heaven cannot be averted, but Dr Rush can mitigate the yellow Fever, and he can do much to guard against that Avarice which is our national Sin, which is most likely to draw down Judgments. An Aristocracy of Wealth, without any Check but a Democracy of Licentiousness is our Curse. I wish that Aristocracy was in a hole, guarded by Hercules with his Club on one Side and an honest People with their Millions of hands on the other. The eternal Intrigues of our monied and Landed and Slaved Aristocracy, are and will be our ruin. I will be neither Aristocrat nor Democrat; without a Mediator between the two. With such a Mediator I will be both. Answer me candidly to this.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5239", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan Van der Kemp, 25 April 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Van der Kemp, Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan\nDear Van Der Kemp\nQuincy April 25. 1808\nYou were a Letter in my debt, when you wrote yours of March 17th but you did not know it. I wrote you Some months ago, and asked the favour of you to inform me, what is the Christian Name the Place of Residence, and the present Titles of our Friend Mr De Gyselaer, formerly Pensionary of Dort. I had particular reasons for this Inquiry which you would not disapprove, though I am not at present at Liberty to explain them. My Letter must have been lost in the Post Office, by Some Accident, for there was nothing in it to excite the curiosity of Politicians.\nIn Politicks, one of my Maxims is Nil Desperandum you deprecate the Angel of Perdition who desolats Europe and you pray that he may not be permitted to stretch his Sword to this Continent. To this I say Amen! because I have not a taste for your Ense or Igne. But if I were a Scipio, (observe I do not Say an Alexander a C\u00e6sar, a Charles the twelfth or a Marlborough) I would not wish for a better Employment, that that of giving the first Check to this Destroyer in America. I dread him not.\u2014How many Men can he transport to America? Fifty\u2013thousand Men, would require one hundred and fifty thousand Tons of ships, that is five hundred Ships of Three hundred Tons Burthen to transport them to America, and then one half of them would be Sick, and unfit for service. But where can he find five hundred ships of 300 tons. All Europe at present, could not furnish them. Ships of War can hardly Stow away their own Sailers and Marines. Put an Additional Number of Soldiers on board for the long Voyage to America and you breed a plague. If this Country could not resist fifty thousand Men, it deserves to be enslaved. Rome with 250,000 Citizens fought Carthage Siria Macedonia, Gaul Spain and Etolia. We have a Million of Citizens: and an immense Continent, not a Single City to Subdue.\nI shall never forget the Evenings I Spent with our Friend Luzac, with his Father and Unkle, one of four Score and the other near it. These venerable Sages entertained me with the Controversies in your Country between the Maritime Provinces and the Inland: between Navy and Army. They told me of Addresses to the Prince of orange in their Youth in which the Speaker pronounced the Words \u201cShips! Ships! Schippen! Schippen! forgive me if I have forgotten the Dutch Word.\nI have always cryed \u201cShips! Ships! Hamiltons Hobby Horse was Troops! Troops! With all the Vanity and Timidity of Cicero, all the Debauchery of Marc Anthony and All the Ambition of Julius Caesar, his object was the command of fifty thousand Men. My object was the Defence of my Country, and that alone, which I knew could be effected only by a Navy.\nYour Sons observation is very Shrewd; but the Paragraph from the Leyden Paper, has Spirit concealed under flattery.\nThe present Administration taught the People at large many of their Errors and the People mislead them: but all these Enquiries are as little to the purpose at present as the original Sin of Adam. The Question is what is to be done?\nMy Family is all well and as happy as public / Affairs will allow\nJ. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "06-13-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5240", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Benjamin Rush, 13 June 1808\nFrom: Rush, Benjamin\nTo: Adams, John\nMy venerable & dear friend\nPhiladelphia June 13th: 1808\nPublic and private news & anecdotes are now so limited by the present state of our Country, that I have had nothing worth putting upon paper for your Amusement since the reciept of your letter. The principal design of this hasty scrawl is to inform you that you still live in my Affections, and that few persons occur oftener to my thoughts. Indeed I can scarcely review any of the memorable events of the Revolution, or revolve any leading principle of Action of in man without associating them with your name, or with your letters and Conversation.\nI perceive by the papers that your son is dismissed from the Senate of the United States. I do not regret it. His talents will command the first business in his profession, and the results of that business in the evening of his life, will afford him more comfort than the praises of a party, or even of his whole Country, & perhaps still more than the Consciousness of having served a forgetting country with fidelity & success.\n\u201cO! had I but one ten thousand of those precious days which did no work\u201d for my family between the years 1774 & 1780, they should be very differently not be again employed in exposing the Acts of British tyrants, and American Demagogues. I feel pain when I am reminded of my exertions in the cause of what we called liberty; and sometimes wish I could erase my name from the declaration of Independence. In Case of a rupture with Britain or France\u2014what shall we we fight for?\u2014for our Constitution? I cannot meet with a man who loves it. It is considered as too weak, by an half of our Citizens, and too strong by the Other half.\u2014Shall we fight rally round the standard of a popular Chief? Since the death of Washington there has been no such Centre of Union. Shall We contend for our paternal acres and dwelling houses? Alas! how few of these are owned by the Men who will in case of a War be called to the helm of our Government. Their property consists chiefly in Bank stock, and that to such an extent that among some of them it is considered as a mark of bad Calculation for a man to live in a house of his own. with all I lately attended an old man who died under my care in the 81st year of his Age & of Course he knew America in his youthful and innocent days. In speaking of the Change in the principles & morals of our people which has taken place since the Revolution, he said, \u201cthey had all become idolaters\u2014they worshipped but one god it is true, if but that god was God Dollar.\u201d Were I permitted to coin a word suggested by my patients remark I would say, we were a \u201cbedollared nation.\u201d In walking our streets I have often been struck with the principal subjects of conversation of our citizens. Seldom have I heard a Dozen words of which \u201cDollar discount \u2014and a good Spec\u201d did not compose a part. \u201cO! Civitas mox peritura si emptorem invenias.\u201d St. Paul places coveteousness and Uncleaness together as improper subjects of Conversation. But not only our Streets, but our parlours are constantly vocal with the language of a broken office, and even at our Convivial dinners, \u201cDollars\u201d are a standing dish upon which all feed with rapacity and Gluttony. But I will quit this loathsome subject, and proceed to the Conclusion of my letter, but not without mentioning the great pleasure I enjoyed a few weeks ago in hearing your old pupil Mr Mason of Boston speak of your in terms of the highest veneration. None of your talents or services appear to be lost upon him. My wife & Daughter are now at Princeton. Were they at home they would unite with all my Sons in respects to you and your excellent lady with Dear Sir yours sincerely & Affectionately\nBenjn: Rush\u2014\nPS: General Moreau compares our Country to the trunk of a G and limbs of a Giant, with the muscles of an infant.\nA Union has taken place between the Quids and Democrats in favor of Mr Snyder as our future Governor. This Union it is said was the effect of the rejection of your Son from the Senate of the U States.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "06-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5241", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Henry Guest, 15 June 1808\nFrom: Guest, Henry\nTo: Adams, John\nYour Very Frindly Letter of the 14th. March last Came Duly to hand. it gave and Still gives Me Much pleasure\u2014I am allso Much pleased with my son Henry for doing himself so Much Sattisfaction As his Paying you that respect that He Knew I should have done if Near you on a Journey to Boston\u2014He realy gave Me Much Sattisfaction that his Pollitical ideas pleased you. His Lettes to Me Are full of your kind treatments of him and he Seems not to know how to say Enough in praise of your good Lady\u2014In fear that I should not have the pleasure to See your Son in his return from Senate, I wrote him a Short Note that I had A Little Staff to Send by him that was to Support your tottring Limbs if you Arrived at My age, of A true American growth. He Caled and I felt Overjoyd Joyed to have A son of yours Within My Wals But Could not Speack of Such Matters As I Could have Wished having Company that I could not trust\u2014When I deliverd the Staff I Desired My best wishes for your health and happyness and to him to tell You, to have it Christned Your Guest and Wished it to have the Honour to attend you Whenever you walked out to View Your Farm\u2014\nThese Sir, I Acknowledgeto be Small Matters and Might pass with you if our Country was in A tranquil State\u2014But in this preasent unhappy Crisis Your Mind and All your Superiour powers Must be Supposed to Extricate Your Country from these at present Dismal Dark and Dreary times\u2014But in your present Private Station Without power to inforce your salutory Advice, We feele Moste Sensibly its Want. Your time in Life, With Experience in public Affairs Calls Loudly on you to Come once More out of Your Retreat And if you are assailed Again With Detraction from Rascals Your Philosophy and Knowledge of Man With the Example of Washington Jefferson their invenemored Shafts Will have No Effect With the honest parts of Our Country. My best Wishes Are with you Who Are Honoured Sir your Most Humble Servt.\nHenry Guest", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "06-20-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5242", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 20 June 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Rush, Benjamin\nMy dear Physical and Medical Philosopher.\nQuincy June 20, 1808\nI give you this Title for the present only. I Shall Scarcely allow you to be a political, moral, or Christian Philosopher, till you retract Some of the Complaints Lamentations, Regrets and Penitences in your Letter of the 13th.\u2014But more of this presently.\nMr John Reed, the first Lawyer who left a great Reputation in our State, in the Administration of Governor Shirley was a Councillor, or in the Style of that day One of his Majesty\u2019s Honourable Council, according to our Charter. Shirley proposed a Law, that was inconsistent with Liberty and the public good, and Reed who was a Man of great Integrity and Fortitude, as well as Talents opposed it with such unanswerable Reasons as prevailed with the Council to reject the Bill.\u2014Shirleys Sychophants, a numerous host, were in Such a rage, that at the next Election, they exerted themselves in Caucus\u2019s and Intrigues so successfully that they turned out, Father Reed, as he was then called. After the Result of the Election was declared, the old Gentleman coming down the stair from the Council Chamber met one of his Friends and said to him \u201cI am dead, and it is well with me.\u201d My son may say the same, for the same reasons.\nOur good old Massachusetts, has undergone an instantaneous Conversion. Last year the Federalists were about Ninety in four hundred and fifty. This year they have a Majority, of about the Number of the Boston Seats. Have you never known or read of a good Sober, honest religious Man, who had passed his days in general in rational Piety and Steady Virtue, who falling in his old Age into bad Company, had become a little debauched both with Wine and Women, till all of a Sudden Some great Calamity befalling him he was instantaneously converted into a flaming Fanatic and became a furious Persecuter, of all his old sober Friends. Just so our good old Massachusetts, for a few years past has been declining into the rankest democratical Debauchery: but the Embargo, like a Plague Pestilence or Famine, has awakened her from her vicious dream and turned her into a furious persecuting Fanatick Enthusiast for hyperfederalism.\nNow Sir, for your Groans. You and I, in the Revolution acted from Principle; We did our Duty, as We then believed, according to our best Information Judgment and Consciences. Shall We now repent of this? God forbid! No! If a banishment to Cayenne, or to Bottany Bay or even the Guillotine were to be the necessary Consequence of it to us, We ought not to repent. Repent? this is impossible how can a Man repent of his Virtues?\u2014Repent of your Sins, and Crimes and willfull Follies, if you can recollect any: But for never repent of your Charities, of your Benevolences, of your Cures in the Yellow Fever, no, nor of the innumerable hazards of your Life you have run, in the prosecution of your duty.\nI can Say with you, that I do not regret my Sons Rejection from the next Senate nor his Resignation of this. His Resignation I fully approve. A Station in public Life is not desireable, at this time, though perhaps a Man ought not to refuse it, when called to it.\nYou ask, in case of a Rupture with Britain or France, what shall We fight for? I know of no better answer to give than this, to get rid of the Embargo. This object, as I understand the Politicks of the times is worth a War with all the World. But where are We to trade, when We are at War with all the World?\nMy Friend! Our Country is in Masquerade! No Party, No Man dares to avow his real Sentiments. All is disguise, Visard, Cloak. The People are totally puzzled and confounded. They cannot penetrate the Views, designs or objects of any Party or any Individual. If I was only forty year old, I would, as I did at that age, Sett all Disguise and fear at Defyance, and once More lead my Country. But now it would be Madness in me to attempt any Thing. I have not any Confidence in my own Judgments. My Strength of Body and Capacity of Application to Business or study, are gone. But Such is the Constitution of my Mind that I cannot, avoid forming an Opinion. It is happy and fortunate I believe for my Country, that I have no Call, to explain myself. But I have an opinion, that there is but one Course for my Country to pursue in the present Crisis. That course I would indicate to you if I could converse with you in secret Confidence, but I ought not to put it in Paper. I even doubt whether you would agree with me. I know not whether one Man in the Union would Support me. Indeed I fear that the critical moment is passed past.\nOur Constitution operates as I always foresaw and predicted it would. It is a Game at Leap-frog. The Federalists ruled for twelve years, by very Small Majorities: then the Republicans leaped over their heads and shoulders and have reigned Seven Years: it is even uncertain whether their Dominion will last another Year: but every Appearance indicates that it will not continue beyond twelve years, when the Federalists will leap over their heads and shoulders again. Thus from twelve years to twelve years We are to have a total revolution of Parties: and the Principle Seems to be established on both Sides that the Nation is never to be governed by the Nation: but the whole is to be exclusively governed by a Party. Integrity is as Tacitus Says certissimum Exitium, most certain destruction; and Impartiality is Treason.\nYou ask \u201cShall We rally round the Standard of a popular Chief\u201d? I know not whom you mean. I am determined to rally round the Standard of the President, as far as I can in honor, whether Mr Pinkney Mr Clinton or Mr Madison be the Man. I will engage in no systematical and universal opposition to any Man. We must rally round our Government, or be undone.\u2014Since the death of Washington, you say there has been no Center of Union. But what Center was Washington? He had unanimous Votes as President, but the two houses of Congress and the great Party of the People, were more equally divided under him than they ever have been since. Jonathan Dickenson Serjeant and Dr Hutchinson would have turned him out of his House, if the Yellow fever had not been Sent to save him, and a Majority of the People of the Union would then have applauded Genet, untill John Quincy Adams turned the Tide of popular fury and Delusion. Never was Man under greater obligation to another, than Washington was to that youth, and no Man was more Sensible of it, than Washington himself, as I can prove by indisputable Evidence.\nCommerce and Wealth have produced Luxury, Avarice and Cowardice. Luxuria incubuit, victamque ulciscitur Britaniam. Our bedollared Country has become a Miser and a Spendthrift, Alieni appetens Sui profusus. Former Ages have never discovered any Remedy against the Universal Gangrene of Avarice in commercial Countries, but Setting up Ambition as a Rival to it. Military Honors have excited Ambition, to Struggle against Avarice, till Military Honours have degenerated into hereditary Dignities. You and I have no military Ambition, nor any great Wealth, and both of us wish that Ambition and Avarice both may be restrained by Law, and be Subservient to Liberty: But Nature will have her Course and Corruption is coming in like a flood, accellerated by English Influence in the greatest degree and by French Influence in a very considerable Degree, and Still more by the eternal internal Struggle between Debtor and Creditor, which has overturned every Republic from the Beginning of time.\nYou have puzzled me with an Enigma, which I pray you to explain. You say the Quids have united with the Democrats in favour of Snyder, because J. Q. Adams was left out of the Senate of U. S.\u2014Pray unriddle this. What Connection could there be, between my Sons Election and the Election of your Governor? Did my old Friend McKean and his Whimsicals whom you call Quids consider J. Q.s rejection as a Tryumph of Republicanism, and take Courage from it to join in it? or as a Tryumph of Federalism, and intimidated by it, join the Republicans to check the Progress of it. I have not Penetration enough to see through it.\nFamily regards as usual\nJ. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "07-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5245", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 25 July 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Rush, Benjamin\nDear Benjamin\nQuincy July 25 1808\nHandsome Bradford, of thy City, allarmed me, the other day at our Athenaeum in Boston, by telling me, that Dr Rushes Business had amazingly encreased and was encreasing. Knowing thine Ardor in thy Profession, I was apprehensive that thy Zeal for the Health of the Sick would Soon eat thee Up, and consequently that thine Ether would escape from this Colluvies of Humanity to the Regions of Divinity before mine. As Charity \u201ccommence par Soi-m\u00eame,\u201d I charge thee, from regard to my own Self as well as thine own self to take care of thine own health, in preference to that of any of thy Patients!\nBut to change the Style a little; not much.\u2014I look at the Presidential Election as I do at the Squabbles of little Girls, about their Dolls and at the more Serious Wrangles of little Boys which Sometimes come to blows, about their Rattles & Whistles. It will be a mighty Bustle about a mighty Bauble.\nIn one of your Letters you Say that one half the People think the Government too Strong and the other half too weak. The Truth is it is too Strong, already, without being just.\u2014In the hands of Aristocrats it has been too Strong without being Sufficiently wise or just: in the hands of Democrats it has been too Strong without being either wise or just.\u2014Wisdom and Justice can never be promoted till the Presidents office instead of being a Doll and a Whistle, shall be made more independent and more respectable; capable of mediating between two infuriated Parties. Till this is done, the Government will be ride and tye a game at leap frog, one Party once in Eight or twelve years leaping over the head and shoulders of the other, kicking and Spurring when it rides. If the President must be the head of a Party, and not the President of the Nation, We have no hope of long escaping a civil Contest.\nYou justly observe that the Embargo operates in favour of a Revolution of Power. That is the Embargo will enable the Aristocrats to leap over the heads and Shoulders of the Democrats, as Taxes, &c enabled the Democrats eight Years ago to leap over theirs. But if the Aristocrats get the Power, how will they use it? Will they Submit to the Proclamations, Orders of in Council &c of the English, and go to War with France Spain Portugal Holland Italy Germany Prussia Denmark & Russia. Such a War I think would be worse than the Embargo. Though my System has always been Neutrality and I have Sacrificed every Thing to it yet I have always been convinced that it was our true Policy to preserve as long as possible a good Understanding with France, and that if We were driven to Extremities, We had better preserve Peace with France. Notwithstanding this I would not bear Insult and Injury from France. If We get into a Quarrell with France, and the War Passions are once excited between our People and the People of France and her Allies, our Presidents will be mere Statholders danced upon British Wires all Naval Defence will be discountinanced as it has been in Holland Since King William, and We shall have no Commerce but the miserable Pittance which British Avarice will allow Us.\nThough the Life of Hamilton, will be a made Up Picture, like Deane Swifts C\u0153lia, and Rags will be contrived to prop, the flabby dugs least down they drop, I shall be very glad to see it. I hope his famous Letter which produced the Army, the Sedition Law &c in which he recommended an Army of fifty thousand Men, ten thousands of them Horse, will not be omitted.\nThe Death of Dr Shippen has revived many Scenes in my Mind of ancient times. In more modern days he was too much of a Virginian to care much about me. His Son too, became a Democratic Dunce, though he had been under Obligations to me in England as another Father.\nI thank you for the two Pamphlets. Mr Cuthberts is ingenious, but I do not agree with him. Your Medical Department Shines with great Glory. I wish ours at Cambridge would emulate you but I despair of it. Mark I do not wish yours worse, but ours better than it is. So I am not guilty of Envy.\nMy Family all Salute yours, all yours.\nThe Aristocratical Tricks The Coups de Theatre played off in the Funerals of Washington Hamilton and Ames are all in Concert with the Lives and Histories, written and to be written all calculated like Drums and Trumpets and Fifes to drown in an Army to drown the Unpopularity of Speculations, Banks Paper Money and mushroom fortunes. You See through these Masks and Veils and Cloaks, but the People are dazzled and blinded by them and so will Posterity be. The Aristocrats know how to dupe the Democrats better than the latter to deceive the former, though both will lie with the most invincible front.AdieuJ. AdamsI have read Spences \u201cBritain independent of Comerce.\u201d Who could have expected to See the Doctrine of Artaxerxes, Aristotle, Mr Lock and Dr Quesnay conjured up by a British Ministry to reconcile the People to their Measures? The Principle Seems to be the Same with Harringtons political Axiom, that Mankind are led by the Teeth and that Dominion follows the Ballance of Property in Land. The foundation is true: but the Superstructure erroneous, Agriculture must be encouraged by Manufactures, and both by Commerce. The three by their reciprocal Action and Reaction on each other, produce national Prosperity.I doubt however, Whether We, for want of Manufactures, can say that America is independent of Commerce, so truly as the English. This our beloved Country, my dear Friend is indeed in a very dangerous Situation: It is between two great fires in Europe, and between two ignited Parties at home, Smashing Sparkling and flaming ready to burst into a Conflagration. In this State of Embarrassment, Confusion and Uncertainty, no Genius appears: no comprehensive mind: no exalted Courage. What shall We do? What will become of Us? To you and me, these Things are of little Consequence. But We have Children and Grand Children and shall soon have Great Grand Children. And indeed the Nation ought all to be dear to Us, and tenderly cherished as our offspring.\nThe Embargo is a cowardly measure. We are taught to be Cowards both by Federalists and Republicans. Our Gazettes and Pamphlets tell Us that Bonaparte is omnipotent by Land, that Britain is omnipotent at Sea: that Bonaparte will conquer England and command all the British Navy, and send I know not how many hundred thousand Soldiers here and conquer from New Orleans to Passamaquaddy. Though every one of these Bugbears is an empty Phantom, yet the People seem to believe the Every Article of this bombastical Creed and tremble and Shudder in Consequence. Who shall touch these blind Eyes? The American People are not Cowards nor Traitors. \nJ. A.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "08-03-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5246", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan Van der Kemp, 3 August 1808\nFrom: Van der Kemp, Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir!\nOldenbarneveld 3 Aug. 1808\nI can not express in words the livel\u00ff Satisfaction I enjoy\u2019d in receiving your favour of the 25th of april. It was Some time, before I observed, that it was more than three months old. From where does this originate. Is the correspondence of an Insignificant, forgotten western Inhabitant an object of alarm? but it can not be poor V. d kemp at whom these reptiles aim\u2014they gnaw with rancour at a mere illustrious object\u2014but god be praised\u2014they can not hurt Him. I Suppose\u2014the crime is perpetrated in Massachusetts\u2014Look at the inclosed Sealing\u2014It is from you? The Letter\u2014which you mentioned of unanswered\u2014never reached me\u2014It appears you are persuaded of it\u2014and so you ought to be\u2014knowing\u2014who I am I do not recollect that I wrote you since the 17th of march I had answered before that of apr. 23 1807, the last, I was honoured with\u2014and wrote, if I am not mistaken, again in Nov. or Dec. Your Sudden Silence was Strange in my e\u00ffe, but would not have prevented\u2014m\u00ff writing at decent intervals\u2014tho I Should have considered it becoming\u2014not to importune you too much\u2014I was confident you could not forget me\u2014and your advancing age might prevent your regular answer\u2014it was enough for me\u2014that you remained my friend! This is Something highly valuable indeed\u2014but after the loss of J. Luzac\u2014less could not Satisfy me.\nThis odious transaction remembers me a Similar accident, the first year of my arrival in America. I corresponded with my friend P. Vreede, late of the Dutch Director\u00ff, then at Laer, in Brabant\u2014at the period of the first Braband revelotion. Government intercepted all Letters of an\u00ff Suspicious nature\u2014mine Shared that fate. After Some months Vreede went to the Burgomaster, told him, there were Letters for him\u2014as he longe since had expected some, The Burgomaster made confession \u201cbut it were only Suspicious Letters! written in a mysterious wa\u00ff\u2014and dated from Esopus! which alone denoted, that other things were Said, and others understood\u201d deliver me Soon these Letters from my friend: good god! Burgomaster\u2014Esopus is a village 3000 miles from here on the American Continent\u2014my friend not even thinks upon your miserable revolution.\nI never received that Letter you mention, in which you asked Some information, with regard to my worthy friend de Gyselaer. \u201cCornelis de Gyselaer\u2014late Pensionar\u00ff of Dordrecht\u2014Le\u00ffden\u201d. I know no other titles of him. he chose, to fix his domicilium at Leyden\u2014to enjoy the Societ\u00ff of Luzac; and D. van Halteren\u2014both no more\u2014from time to time he Spent a part of the Summer Season at Brussels\u2014So Mr Blok of Enckhuisen, who visited me lately, informed me\u2014I hope not, my information comes too late. He enjoy\u2019s otium cum dignitate\u2014how few like him are remaining! his private Station is a more exalted dignit\u00ff\u2014than the great cross of any order could bestow upon him\u2014It would give him an additional value in his own e\u00ffes\u2014could I have him informed\u2014that he was yet remembered by John Adams!\nSince a year my Dutch Correspondence is entirely Kept\u2014no Letters\u2014from france or Holland reach us\u2014It is\u2014as if ever\u00ff one was dead\u2014ere long, it may be So with me\u2014a French Correspondent warns me\u2014in closing his correspondence for the present, that every Letter is opened\u2014even those, which are Sent for Holland\u2014and examined\u2014and often kept back, tho. in appearance\u2014insignificant.\nShips! Ships! yes Sir! with them\u2014with a Squadron of 16 men of war and an adequate number of frigates, America Should have now dictated to the Belligerent powers in the place of being the Scorn and derision of Europe. No nav\u00ff can endanger our Libert\u00ff\u2014a Standing arm\u00ff must sooner or later become its bane\u2014and its encrease, beyond what imperious necessity commands, must be viewed with a jealous eye by every lover of his Countr\u00ff.\nOne of m\u00ff friends\u2014an European of distinguished military talents highly recommended\u2014applied to the President\u2014a few months past\u2014and from him to the Secretary of the Arm\u00ff\u2014The first insinuated\u2014\u201cthat Both houses had resolved not to employ any foreigner\u201d\u2014but received him with great politeness\u2014the secretary told him\u2014\u201cwe Americans were thoroughly enough acquainted with Tactics\u201d (the proposal was to erect a Corps Artillerie legere) but by an b\u00ff he asked him \u201chow the canon was managed on a horse?\u201d\u2014I hope the Secretary was misunderstood, by want of m\u00ff friend\u2014but\u2014I must honestly confess, that I am induced to believe\u2014my friend\u2019s observation\u2014after having Seen the Museum at Philadelphia, is not altogether unfounded \u201cJ\u2019ai vu le Mammoth: quel animal! quel grandeur! imagin\u00e9z vous Monsieur! Je fus tent\u00e9 de faire une comparaison entre cet animal, et le Sage Secretaire d.l.g. mais je trouvais, que le dernier gagnerait le prix.\"\nI intended to touch another Subject\u2014a wish\u2014that as President you would honor our friend Luzac\u2014with a few words\u2014if it is not against the Rules of your Academ\u00ff\u2014what man deserves better your Panegyric\u2014and naked truth would make a ver\u00ff Sublime one, and could not be but highly affectionate, if pronounced by his admiring friend\u2014but I leave it to your consideration\u2014I can not continue being overwhelmed with thoughts\u2014thro the perusal of the last tidings from Spain\u2014alas! poor Bourbons, The Austrian Emperor and Russian Alexander ought to ask every morning their Chamberlain\u2019s\u2014if they are yet Emperors? impenetrable are the ways of Providence\u2014they are however wise and good\u2014Let us adore\u2014and Silently wait the issue\u2014Continue to favour me with your friendship, that I may enjo\u00ff the heartfelt Satisfaction, of continuing m\u00ff assurance, that I remain with the highest respect / your obliged\u2014and devoted / friend\nFr. Adr. vanderkemp", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "08-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5248", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan Van der Kemp, 15 August 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Van der Kemp, Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan\nSir,\nQuincy near Boston August 15th. 1808\u2014\nThe inclosed Letter came under cover, to me in a letter from your father dated the 3d. of August. After hinting that there had been some unfair play in the Post Office he says \u201cI suppose the Crime is perpetrated in Massachusetts\u2014Look at the inclosed sealing. It is from you?\u201d I looked at the sealing and concluded there was something within to unriddle the mystery. I accordingly clipped the wafer and behold instead of any Treason or other high Crime or Misdemeanor, I found a Letter as elegant as it was affectionate from an Amiable Sister to a deserving Brother. What to do with it was the question? To send it back would disappoint both Brother & Sister. I concluded then to inclose it directly to you, and throw myself entirely on your candor & goodness to pardon the freedom used with the Seal.\nWith much esteem & regard for your family / including yourself I am Sir your / most obedient Servant\nJ. A", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "08-31-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5250", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 31 August 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Rush, Benjamin\nMy dear Sir\nQuincy August 31. 1808\nInstead of preparing for Commencement, I am answering your delicious Letter of the 24th.\u2014But where to begin or where to end! I will follow your own order.\nIf I had ever heard that a Pen of Tacitus had been preserved among the Reliques of Antiquity, I Should Swear you had Stolen it to draw the Character of the most conspicuous moral political and military Character Phenomenon of this Age.\u2014 I tremble not however at his name. All the Ships in Europe, if he can procure, could not transport an Army to hurt Us! I see in him a Conqueror, who resembles Alexander C\u00e6sar, Mahomet and Couli Kan, and the Vices Follies and Madness, as well as the Genius Courage, and desperation, which belonged to them all. In Attention to the Arts and Sciences he is equal to any of them. His Religion is and Morality are very like that of all of them. I See nothing in him so very much Superiour to Dumourier or Pichegru, or several others, of the Generals now under him. The Impetus of the Revolution, Setting all Things at Defyance operated like a Steam Engine to bend the Character of the french Soldiers to the Severest military discipline the World ever witnessed. All this was done and the french Nation and Armies formed by the national assemblies and their Committees to the most absolute Submission before he came to the Command. With this Instrument he has defended himself against a Series of Coalitions and Combinations against him. In one Point he has been more hardy and impudent than C\u00e6sar or Cromwell: he has thrown off a Masque which they were obliged to wear and openly avowed his personal and Family Ambition. But what is he now? I believe him to be the most miserable Individual of the human Species. He must be conscious that he is brandishing a Beetle round his head upon the Pinnacle of a Steeple. His whole System must crumble under him. He is contending with England for a Superiority of Power, a glittering Object for which the English and French Nations have incessantly wrestled and fought for many Ages. It is in vain to Say the English are acting in Self defence, for So is Napoleon, and he is in more danger than the English. The Truth is the English are contending to be the dominant Power of the World, or if you will for universal Empire as much as the French. The Trident of Neptune is the Scepter of the World: and that unlimited Despotism on the Ocean for which Britain avowedly and openly contends would be a more dangerous Domination over the civilized World than any that Napoleon ever can accomplish.\nWhat is now the Power of Napoleon? Compare it with that of the House of Austria under Charles the 5th and his Successors. The Contention between the House of Austria under Charles and the House of Bourbon under Francis kept Mankind in a fire as consuming as this in our day. Charles, as ambitious and restless as Napoleon ran about Europe by Sea & Land Setting up and pulling down as notably as the Frenchman or Corsican. No longer ago than 1630 the Successor of Charles was Master of Spain, Portugal all the Treasures of America, the Low Countries, the Milanese, the Kingdom of Naples, of Bohemia, of Hungary, and even Germany was become his Patrimony. All this was a greater Power by far than Napoleon, now possesses. The Cry of Universal Empire was as loud then as it is now.\nCompare the Power of France now to that of Louis 14th who was hated and dreaded by all Europe as much as Bona is now, and whose Armies of 400 thousand Men bore a greater Preportion to the Standing Armies of Europe then, than those of France do now, and whose Generals Cond\u00e9 Turenne, Villars Luxembourg and many others were equal to any of Napoleons. Not to trouble you to read many books to refresh your memory: only run over the 14th Chapter of Voltaires Age of Louis 14 and See the Pride of the Monarch and the terror of the World. His Navy was then terrible even to the English, and his Armies invincible till Marlborough check\u2019d him as I hope Some Gallant English or Spanish officer will the Napoleons.\nCompare the Napoleons with the Capitian Rou in the time of Charlemaine who had as vast Views as much Skill in Arms and Policy and was as cruel as the present Hairbrain.\nThere are so many in Philadelphia, tho not more than in N.Y. Baltimore or Boston whose Principles I thought not very generous that I cannot guess who was the Blockhead who changed an orthodox opinion that I was a weak Man for the heretical conceit that I am a wise one, at a time when he can have no temptation to it. My own opinion has always agreed with his old opinion, and I am not about to change my opinion, it, was in complaisance to him, Settled more than half a Century ago upon a philosophical Investigation of my Perceptions retentions, Judgments, Reasons, Passions, Imaginations and Prejudices, in complaisance to him. Whoever he is I pronounce him a weak Man too. He never was capable of Understanding, even me. I never was for fixing a \u201cperpetual hereditary Chief Magistrate\u201d. This will never be done. Whenever, if ever, there is one Such Magistrate, there will be two or three. The U.S. will be divided into two or three Sections, and all of them became Vassalls to Uropean Powers. Call them Statholders, if you will\u2014Another Thing! whenever there is an hereditary Chief, there must be an hereditary Senate to check him, or he will soon be either guillotined like Charles 1. and Louis the 16 or become a Despot, like Napoleon. If I had not been a weak Man I should have explain\u2019d myself so as to be better understood: and if your Man had not been a weak Man he would have understood me better. All I have contended for, has been that the first Magistrate Should be made so respectable and So independent as to be able to mediate between the two great Factions of Aristocrats and Democrats which always has existed and always will tear Mankind to Pieces. Here I want, but have not time, to introduce a new Theory of Vanity which I have discovered\u2014 If I should not forget it, I may hereafter, explain it. It would be Somewhat to the Purpose in this place.\nThe Nomination to the Treasury of the Mint, is one of the Actions of my Life, which I have ever recollected with the most entire Satisfaction though it made me about thirty nine Enemies and among the rest Frederick Augustus Mughlenbourg.\nEvery Sprigg of Laurell you receive at home or from abroad gives me pleasure because I believe it, well merited. Your \u201cRules for the Preservation of health\u201d will be another Benefaction to Mankind, I doubt not.\nI was much pleased with handsome Bradford and should have asked a Visit of him to Quincy, if he had not told me he was obliged to return the next day.\nOf Mr Snyder I know nothing, but by Newspapers, the most faithless Tattlers, Busy bodies and Mischief Makers in the World. Mr Ross I know and esteem to a certain degree\nLow diet is good in some Cases, I know by Experience, and Bleeding too I have found necessary at times. But which of the Maniacks shall We bleed Napoleon or George?\nI once Said, in answer to a Virginia address that it would depend upon Virginians to determine, whether We should have a Faction to crush and humble. Virginians did determine, and the Faction was crushed, and humbled in dust, and ashes. Every Man convicted was obliged to pay Fines and Costs; to Germans the Severest of Punishments; and four of them were obliged to obtain twelve Thousand Petitioners for their Lives. I think this was dust and ashes, especially as they were all obliged to confess their faults express their penitence and promise Reformation. Shall I mention the names of Virginians and Pensilvanians who fomented this Insurrection? if you desire it, I will.\nThe Federalists are now turning the Tables upon them and imitating their Acts, and I fear will excite insurrections in their turn. In Short, my Friend, I fear We are in danger, if not upon the Point of introducing a foreign War by a civil one. The Stubble is dry and a Spark may raise a flame. The Spirits are on fire. When the Elections are decided, I hope, they will be kept under, if they cannot be extinguished.\nFamily to Family as ever\nJ. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "09-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5252", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 8 September 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Rush, Benjamin\nMy dear Friend\nQuincy September 8. 1808\nI will not Stand upon Ceremonies, with you, and wait for the Return of a Visit, or an Answer to my last Letter.\nWhatever proportion of Loyalty to an established Dinasty of Kings, or whatever taint of catholic Superstition there may be in the present Sensations of the Spanish People, I revere the Mixture of pure Patri or however their Conduct may have been excited by British or Austrian Gold, I revere the Mixture of pure Patriotism that appears to be in it and inseperable from it: and I wish to know the Sentiments of your Pensilvanian Statesmen concerning it.\nThe Contest between the Houses of Austria and Bourbon in the beginning of the last Century, for the Succession to the Throne of Spain is well known. Phillip the 5th and Charles the Sixth were Rivals, as Ferdinand the 7th and Joseph the 1st are now; Charles was Supported by the Emperor, England and Holland, and Phillip by France and her Allies. The Earls of Galloway and Pertersbourg ran about Spain with Armies at their backs and proclaimed Charles at Madrid and many other Places, till Louis 14th and his Grandson Phillip were in despair. In this Situation, Vauban the great Teacher of Fortification and one of the profound Statesmen as well as honest Patriots of France, proposed to his Court to Send Phillip to reign in America, that the Commerce of Mexico and Peru might be Secured to the French. The English Seem to have adapted this Project of Vauban and to aim at Securing the Commerce of South America to themselves. Have your Philadelphia Politicians considered what will be the Consequence of this to the United States? How will it affect our Louisiana Claims, our West India Commerce? I am almost afraid to ask so bold and hazardous a question, as Whether it will not make France the natural Ally of the U.S.?\nThe Inclination of the Spaniards were in favour of Phillip and the fortitude of the Castillians, turned the Scale in his favour. They made great Efforts when they found him in danger. It is a very arduous Enterprize to give impose upon a Nation, a King in Spight their Taste. The Austrians the Dutch the English and the Portuguese were harrassed in Spain, Suffered for Want of Provisions and were consumed by degrees.\nBy Some Accounts certain Provinces in Spain have proclaimed Prince Charles. This looks like a desire to revive the old Connection of Spain with the House of Austria, which might check the House of Napoleon for the present, but would lay a foundation for interminable future Wars in Europe.\nIs there room to hope that the French will meet with effectual obstructions in Spain? How will they procure Provisions? Not by Sea. The English fleet is in the Way. By Land from France and Italy will be almost impossible, and the Spaniards have not Onions and Turnips enough for themselves. An army of two or three hundred thousand Frenchmen will consume a great many Bushells. The Spaniards had better fight and die in Battle, than perish with Famine.\nThese occurrences in Spain open wide Views to those who have more Information and Sagacity than I have. They will give Trouble to Napoleon, employ a great part of his force and be a powerful temptation to Nations he has humbled to avenge their disgrace. The French have always been chased out of Italy. Germany and the North of Europe must be allarmed at the Prospect of having Spain and the Indies in the Power of the Corsicans. In Short, I know not but the Spaniards may produce in England a Marlborough, and in Germany a Eugene to give Napoleon a Fistula. What think you?\nI have always called our Constitution a Game at Leap frog. New England is again converted to Federalism. The Federal Administration lasted twelve years. The Republicans then leaped over their heads and shoulders, and have ruled Eight years; They may possibly hold out, four years more and then probably the Federalists will leap again. But neither Party will ever be Strong while they adhere to their austere exclusive Maxims. Neither Party will ever be able to pursue the true Interest, honor and Dignity of the Nation.\nI lament the narrow, Selfish Spirit of the Leaders of both Parties but can do no good to either. They are incorrigible. We must adopt the Dutch Motto, Incertum quo Fata ferunt.\nJ. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "09-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5253", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Henry Guest, 8 September 1808\nFrom: Guest, Henry\nTo: Adams, John\nI have Deferred Acknowleging the reipt. of your Very Obliging Lettr. Of 16 June Last wherein in a Peculiar Manner you are pleased to Except of your Guest. May it be to you the Service intended from the Simplicity of honist intentions\u2014And I hartily Wish I Could So Easily transpourt the Doner to your preasence for an hour when your Lasure Would Admit\u2014He which in the first Moments Endeavour to Convince you That the proposition Contained in his Address to your Son flowed from the Simplicity of his heart, As he had at that time Only Scene that the Sinful part of the Boston Legeslator had put Another in his room in the Senate When his Year Was Out.\u2014This Struck me with a thought That if his Father Could be made The presidant His Son Might be brought forward in Such Offices As Would baffel their Stupid and Malignant Mallice\u2014This Sir Was one of My Motives not Doubting your Very Supireor tallants and Long tryed Beside I have Long been of Oppinion that the New England States Should have their turn about in being at the head of our new formed Government As they abound in either of the first understanding and Patriotism But Sir When I Read your five reasons for Keeping Out of office I Cried Out Enough Enough Pardon the Simplicity of More than four Score years.\u2014Yours Most Sincearly\nHenry Guest\nHonbl. John Adams at Braintree\nTo the Honorable John Quincy Adams In Boston\nSir I have A bone to pick with You\u2014It seemes when the Fifty majority in Your Legislatur pick to serve in the Senate when your term Should Expire\u2014You gave up the Year that you had a right to serve and your Country had a right in Your Superior political Gifts. I Must acknowledge this gave me a shock that I am not yet Recovered of and I had pleased My Self that by Continuing your time you would by your Superior Tallents and strong patriotism become justly rising Charactor and in Due time would rise to the Head of Our Government. But by that fatal persipitancy Our Country Looses one of her Most Inlitned SONS\u2014Look to this fourth of July Last in which you was Celebrated in All honist Companeys Even to Charleston and Savana\u2014Wishing you health and Stidaness in your future Political Life. I am Sir, Your Most Humble Serv.Henry GuestTo the Hond\nJohn Quincy Adams Boston\nAgain to My Much Esteemed and Honoble, John, Adams at Quincy a few observations for his amusement in A Lessure Hour\u2014\nOur Latter Days is Cast in an Extrordinary Era of times Greater of our Globe is convulsed\u2014Murder and Slaughter of the Human beings seemes to be the order of the Day and in this heretofore friendly and happy country is gitting in a train of Evils that I fear Will lead to Distruction. The necessary and wholesome laws not only Evaded but broke in the face of Day our honist and worthy law Makers Chosen by their country traduced by Vile Publications and the Authors incouraged by a Set of men that ought to be bannished from our country. All this under the Mis freedom of the press and yet if an individial is traduced in his Charrector He has his remedy in Law And shall it be suffered that when our law Makers are traduced in the Most Vile Manner and their laws broken that they have no remedy to Make Example of these Vile printers that is Constantly agravating and pushing Our Country to Distruction condem the Stupid and fals of . I think by force\u2014What freedom to and Overturn the hapiest and freest government under the Son for Which the presses must be free, and these characters suffered to go on With their Diabolitical Work if there is no laws to stop their Career it is time their was one that reach their NECKS\u2014 up A doller or too our country would be happily clear of the greatest Villians that any country can produce And we should again be a band of Brothers Defying the power and the malice of Britain with all their Bribery to shake or overturn our Well poised Government and We would Laugh at the threats of Bonepart With all his s\u2014It is not unlikely but that it is by some Vile publication that has induced this Cool and premeditated Murders at Vermont for which if Example is not made Our government is Lost.\nSir I have wrote the above as these matters process in my mind whenever they are Excuse them by your most Mind. Wishing you and yours health and happiness I Am your\nHenry Guest", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "09-22-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5257", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Benjamin Rush, 22 September 1808\nFrom: Rush, Benjamin\nTo: Adams, John\nMy dear Old & tried friend,\nPhiladelphia Septr: 22. 1808\nThe politicks of our City are under the direction of three Classes of people, old tories, merchents, and brokers. They are neither anticipating, nor retrospective animals. All their calculations are for the present moment. They know nothing of its treaties, nor of the former volcanic eruptions of the power and tyranny of France. The last shower with them is always the heaviest. Why then do you ask me \u201cWhat our Statesmen think of the late events in Spain\u201d? Mr Clymer is almost the only Citizen of Philadelphia with whom I converse upon political Subjects. His mind retains the texture which the Revolution gave it. He is neither a Frenchman nor an Englishman, and laments that Americans partake too much of the principles of both. He is no Advocate for Mr Jefferson; but he boldly defends the embargo, and acquits him of partiality to the french nation. Your old friend Jos. Wharton who is another Citizen of Philada with to whose opinions I often listen in my medical Visits to his family, views the late events in Spain only not thru the medium of War, or Commerce, or government, but of the book of Daniel and the Revelations of St John only. He sees the fulfilment of the prophesies in every battle that is fought in that Country. He talks piously and learnedly upon the downfal of popery and Antichrist, of the dragon,\u2014of the beast that came out of the Sea & of his ten horns, and has no doubt but Napolion is to be the instrument of for preparing the world for the righteous and peaceable government of the Messiah over the Nations of the earth. Here my information respecting your question must end. I hasten from it to add that from the present appearances it is probable Mr Ross will have a Majority of votes for the Chair of our State at the Approaching election.\u2014In our city this will not probably be the next case from the Union that has taken place between the Democrats and Quids, and from the embargo being much less felt by our Citizens, than by the country part of the State, owing to and this from the employment given to all classes of mechanics by the building of above 600 houses, two Churches, and two shot manufactories, one of which is to be 160 feet in height. A gentleman who called to see me a few days ago intimated a desire to know to which of the Candidates for our government I wished success. I answered him by telling him a story of Sir Richard Steel who in travelling through Scotland stopped to ask a Shephard whom he saw watching a flock of Sheep what kind of weather it would be the next day. \u201cJust such weather Sir as I please,\u201d said the Shephard. \u201cYou mean\u201d said Sir Richard (supposing him to be mad from his Answer) just such weather as God pleases\u201d\u2014\u201cWell Sir\u2014what pleases him\u201d (said the Shephard) \u201cpleases me.\u201d\u2014My blood circulates now too slowly through my Veins to expect any change for the better in our affairs from the exertions of an individual however well disposed he may be to accomplish it. The old game of \u201cleap frog\u201d will be played over again should Mr: Ross be elected, and Snyder will not sacrifice the extensive powers our Constitution gives him, by advising, or Consenting to a Convention in order to change it.\nOur papers teem with electioneering Scandal. From all treason, sedition, Conspiracies, and party rage good Lord deliver Us!\u2014I have often heard when a boy of men\u2019s selling their Souls to the Devil to releive a pressing want of money. This practice is now in disuse, but we do the same thing in another way by selling our time, our talents, our tempers, our moral feelings and principles, and sometimes our Wills, as well as our money, to a party. Under the constant pressure of the two powerful and opposite Currents that divide our City, I am enabled to keep my feet. Sooner that float after either of them, I would quit my Country, and go where these were human folly and madness had exhausted themselves, and where the extremity of Despotism had left nothing to fear,\u2014I would in other words end my days in Constantinople or Paris.\u2014\nCould the Absurdities and Contradictions in principle and conduct of our two great parties be for the last 12 years be laid before the world in a candid & dispassionate manner we should be ashamed to call ourselves\u2014men. The disputes of children about their nuts & gingerbread have less folly and wickedness in them.\nFrom a dozen instances of what I allude to, I shall select but two. When the Spaniards shut the port of new Orleans against our Vessels, the cry of the whole federal party was for War, and the Acquisition of Louisissiana by force. Its immense resources in West & East India produce were enumerated in long, sensible & eloquent Speeches & pamphflets. When that country was purchased by Mr Jefferson, the same party condemned his Conduct, depreciated the trade, Soil, & people of that Country, and represented it as a Millstone about the neck of the United States. In the year 1798 the Democrats Opposed the election of Mr Ross upon the ground of his being a Deist. The federalists either denied it, or said his religious tenets had nothing to do with his qualifications for governor. In 1799 the federalists opposed the election of Mr Jefferson upon the ground of his being a Deist. The Democrats denied it, or said his infidel principles had nothing to do with his qualifications for President.\u2014!!!\u2014\u201cNon aula, non eclesia, solum\u2014sed totus mundus histrionem agunt.\u201d\nThe Scriptures speak of nations being drunk, and of all the individuals of the human race being mad. What sober man or what man in his senses would think ing of walking in company, or reasoning with either of them?\u2014\nIn reviewing my Attempts to regulate the winds, or in other words in reviewing my political life, which with the intervals of some years ended with the establishment of the general government, I often wish in the words of Shakespeare King Henry before one of his battles in France \u201cfor One tenthousand of those (not brave men) but hours that did no work for God, nor man nor myself, nor family during the time I have mentioned.\u2014\u201cWhat profit has the world, or my country had of from those things to use the words of an Apostle wherof I am now ashamed\u201d? none, none\u2014none. Dr Jebb used to say \u201cno good effort is lost.\u201d If this be true, let us console myself ourselves with the hope, that my our labors (like the conversations of the people in the Winter at the North pole described by Mr Addison, which froze as they came out of their mouths and thawed in the Spring), will in like manner be thawed by time, and produce their fruits in knowledge & happiness in Centuries to come.\nWhen I took up my pen I expected to write fill but a page or two with its contents, but my imagination has run away with it. Adieu! Adieu! with respects as usual I am Dear Sir ever yours\nBenjn: Rush", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "09-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5258", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 27 September 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Rush, Benjamin\nDear Sir\nQuincy Septr. 27. 1808\nThat Rosicrusian Sylph, that Fairy Queen Mab, or that other familiar Spirit whatever it is, that inspires your nightly dreams, I would not exchange, if I had it, for the D\u00e6mon of Socrates. You have more Wit and humour and Sense in your Sleep, than other People I was about to Say, than you have yourself when awake. I know not whether I have ever read two finer Allegories, than the two you have given me; from your nocturnal Slumbers. I agree, well enough with you in the moral of them both.\nI believe with you, \u201ca Republican Government,\u201d while the People have the Virtues Talents and Love of Country necessary to Support it \u201cthe best possible Government to promote the Interest, dignity and Happiness of Man.\u201d But you know that Commerce Luxury and Avarice have destroyed every Republican Government; England and France have try\u2019d the Experiment, and neither of them could preserve it, for twelve years; It might be said with truth, that they could not preserve it for a moment: for the Commonwealth of England from 1640 to 1660 was in reality a Succession of Monarchies under Pym Hambden Fairfax and Cromwell. And the Republick of France was a Similar monarchy Under Mirabeau Brissot, Danton Robespierre, and a Succession of others like them down to Napoleon the Emperor. The Mercenary Spirit of Commerce has recently destroyed the Republicks of Holland, Switzerland and Venice. Not one of those Republicks, however, dared at any time to trust the People with any Elections whatever, much less with the Elections of First Magistrates. In all those Countries the Monster Venality would instantly have appeared and Swallowed at once all Security of Liberty Property Fame and Life.\nWhen public Virtue is gone, when the national Spirit is fled, when a Party is Substituted for the Nation, and Faction for a Party, when Venality lurks and Skulks in Secret, and much more when it impudently braves the public Censure, whether it be Sent in the form of Emissaries from foreign Powers, or is employed by ambitious and Intriguing domestic Citizens, the Republic is lost in Essence, though it may still exist in form. The Form of a Senate is Still preserved in Rome. The Prince Rezzonico was presented to me in London under the Title of \u201cSenatore di Roma.\u201d But what Sort of a Republick is Rome at present?\nWhen Commerce and Luxury and Dissipation had introduced Avarice among the Greeks, The artfull Policy and military discipline of Phillip and his Son, prevailed over all the Toils, Negotiations, and Eloquence of Demosthenes. The People who in virtuous times, or if you will in times of national Pride had Set the Hosts of Persia at Defyance, now Sold themselves and bowed their Necks to the yoke of a petty Prince of Macedonia. And poor Demosthenes, abandoned, persecuted while he lived was pursued to an ignominius Death, as the only Reward of his Patriotism. Immortal Glory has followed his Eloquence: but this he could not enjoy while he lived: and We know not that he enjoys it Since his death. I hope he has enjoyments Superiour to this.\nThe same Causes produced the Same Effects in Rome, and the Labours Eloquence and Patriotism of Cicero, were to as little purpose as those of Demosthenes, and were equally rewarded.\nWe Mortals cannot work Miracles: We Struggle in vain against the Constitution and Course of Nature.\nAmericans, I fondly hope, and candidly believe are not yet arived at the Age of Demosthenes or Cicero. If We can preserve our Union entire, We may preserve our Republick. But if the Union is broken We become two petty Principalities, little better than the Feudatians one of France and the other of England.\nIf I could lay an Embargo, or pass a Non importation Law against Corruption and foreign Influence, I would not make it a temporal but a perpetual Law, and I would not repeal it, though it Should raise a Clamour as loud as my Gag Law or your Grog Law or Mr Jeffersons Embargo.\nThe Majorities in the five States of New England, though Small are all on one Side. New York has fortified the Same party with half a dozen Members, and anxious are the Expectations from New Jersey Pensilvania and Maryland. There is a body of the Same Party in every other State. The Union I fear is in Some danger. Nor is the danger of foreign War much diminished. An Alliance between England of and Spain, is a new Aspect of Planets towards Us. Surround by Land on the East, North, West and South by the Territories of two Such Powers, and blockaded by Sea by two Such Navies as the English and Spanish, without a Friend or Ally by Sea or Land, We may have all our Republican Virtues put to a Tryal.\nI am weary of Conjectures but not in despair.\nJ. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "09-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5259", "content": "Title: From John Adams to William Cunningham, 27 September 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Cunningham, William\nDear Sir\nQuincy Septr. 27. 1808\nThe papers to No. 6, which you mention in your kind letter of the 19th I have never seen nor heard. In what paper or pamphlet were they published?\nThe federalists, I think, might suffer my old lamp to go out without administering their nauseous oil, merely to excite a momentary flash before it expires.\nDo you think the federalists believe themselves when they say that I am on the side of the executive, through the whole of his administration?\u2014Do they believe that I approve of the repeal of the Judiciary law, which I recommended to Congress? which I believe to be one of the best laws ? which was made by the advice and repeated solicitations of the Judges for several years? which I took infinite pains to organize with a selection of the ablest and fairest characters in the nation? a repeal which I have always believed to be a violation of the constitution? Do they believe that I approve of the neglect and mismanagement of the navy? the omission to build more ships? the neglect to fortify our most important cities and exposed places? Do they believe that I approve of the repeal of the taxes, which would have enabled us not only to make the necessary preparations against the formidable dangers that surrounded us, but gradually to diminish the national debt? Do they believe that I approve of the removal of so many of the best men, or the appointments of so many of the worst? Do they believe that I approve of twenty other things too many to be enumerated? oh ho! they believe no such things. But they are conscious they have injured me and mine and are only forging false and awkward excuses for it.\nIt is true I have not joined in the clamour against the purchase of Louisiana because I know that if the union of the northern, southern, and western states was to continue, the free navigation of the Missisippi was essential to its preservation. I have not joined in the clamour against gun boats, though I des, because I thought gun boats better than nothing, and because I thought the Government ought not to be opposed in any measures of defence, merely because they would not adopt such as I thought the best. I have not clamoured against the Embargo because I thought it a necessary temporary measure, well knowing that it could not be of long duration. I agree with you that it ought to have been limited to some period. Any long continuance of it is not conformable to any feelings or judgment. I had much rather hear a cry in Congress like that which has so often sounded in the British Parliament \u201cWho shall dare to set limits to the Commerce and naval power of this Country?\u201d In refusing to acknowledge a right in Great Britain to impress seamen from our ships, in opposing and resisting the decrees and orders of France and England, in resisting the outrages and hostilities committed upon us, the Administration have my hearty wishes for their success.\u2014You have read in Thompson\u2019s \u201cLiberty\u201d\nAmidst the low murmers of submissive fear\nAnd mingled rage, my Hampden rais\u2019d his voice,\nAnd to the laws appealed.\nMingled rage and fear are now the predominant passions of our nation, and such is the noise and fury that the still, small voice of Reason cannot be heard. If I were only forty years old I might have Enthusiasm enough to hope that I could ride in the whirlwind But at seventy three it would be a delirium.\nI have nothing to hope or wish but repose, and they will not allow me even that small consolation. \nAs I am not consulted by any party or any Individual I take no share and but very little interest in the approaching election. Hamilton\u2019s Ambition, intrigues and Caucuses have ruined the cause of rational federalism by encumbering and entangling it with men and measures that ought never to have been brought forward. I have no objection to Pinckney, but a full persuasion that he never can rise to the chair, and a more compleat conviction still that he ought never to have been nominated for it.\nAs you have mentioned my son, I shall only take the liberty to say that his conduct as far as I know it, has been able, upright, candid, impartial & Independent. His letter to Mr Otis I applaud and admire. His resignation I approve. He would have been more politic if he had declined his invitation to the caucus, though the question was only between Mr Madison and Mr Monroe, and, knowing both, I should certainly as he did prefer the former to the latter. The policy of a limitation to the Embargo is, in a national view, and on a large scale, a nice question. I should probably have been for it, but there is so much to be said on the other side, that I cannot censure my son, for agreeing to it without a limitation, believing as he did, and had reason to believe, that it would soon be repealed. The Federalists by their intolerance have gone far towards justifying or at least excusing Jefferson for his, and for the future it seems to be established as a principle that our Government is forever to be, not a national, but a party Government. How long such a maxim can be maintained, consistently with any civil government at all, time will determine. While it lasts, all we can hope is that in the Game at Leap Frog once in eight or twelve years, the party of the Outs will leap over the head and shoulders of the Ins, for I own to you I have so little confidence in the wisdom, prudence, or virtue of either party that I should be nearly as willing that one party should be unchecked & absolute as the other.\nThus, Sir, I have given you Some hints of my general views of things, but I wish to remain in obscurity, and by no means to become the subject of conversation or speculation.\nMy family return your compliments to yours with your friend\nJ. A.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "09-30-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5260", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Henry Guest, 30 September 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Guest, Henry\nRespected Sir\nQuincy Septr. 30, 1808\nI agree with you in your obliging letter of the eighth of this month that the new England states ought to have their equitable share in the government of the nation and I think that hitherto they have not, I think too that hitherto they have not I think too, that they ought not to bear more than their just proportion of the public burden; but I know that they have. They are so much outnumbered by the Southern states with whom the middle states have always too strong a propensity to join; that the union has not been fairly governed. What remedy may be found for this inequality I presume not to conjecture: and if none should be found, I pretend not to foresee the consequences.\nI cannot agree with you in your disapprobation of the conduct of J. Q. A. in his resignation of a remnant of his last six years in the Senate of the United States. I have seen too many instances of the awkward figure made by Senators in the last Session after it was known that they were superceded for the next year, to wish my Son to have remained a butt to all the malignant newspapers and the no less equally malignant speeches in Congress, without the prospect of doing any good.\nThe last forty or fifty years have been an aweful period in human affairs abounding in great events, which might afford many useful lessons to mankind Philosophers, Theologians, and statesmen have been confounded in their views, reasonings, speculations, and expectations, perhaps they have all proceeded upon false principles. Great Geniuses for confusion have arisen in great numbers: But no great assertor of Order has yet appeared. Those, who have attempted something in this way not having been Princes nor Warriors who could boast of having slaughtered their millions in battle, have not been heard. Mankind, I think, submit ultimately to nothing but the roar of battles, and the splendor of victories. I am So old fashioned as to believe that nothing but a balance of power in Europe can restore peace to the world, and nothing but the balance of power in our national Government, can secure our union or our peace. I have written and laboured and harrangued in vain for almost fifty years, and have no ambition that my Son should do the Same after me, to as little purpose, with as little satisfaction, and the Same reward.\nWith real regard, I am your friend & humble servant\nJ. A.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "09-30-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5261", "content": "Title: To John Adams from J. J. Van der Kemp, 30 September 1808\nFrom: Van der Kemp, J. J.\nTo: Adams, John\nSir\nPhiladelphia September 30th. 1808.\nThe letter you did me the honor to write to me, reached this place during my absence on a visit to my esteemed Parents and that beloved Sister, whose letter to me accidentally fell into your hands, and which you had the goodness to enclose.\u2014I returned only a few days ago from Oldenbarneveld, or I should have embraced an earlier opportunity of expressing my sincere thanks for your kindness and the flattering manner in which you are pleased to speak of my sister and myself.\u2014As it is my chief wish to possess, so it shall always be my constant aim to merit the good opinion of such men, as him whom I have now the honor to address.\nI am, with sentiments of great Esteem / and Respect / Sir, / Your Most Obedt. Humbl Servt.\nJ:J: Vanderkemp", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "10-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5262", "content": "Title: To John Adams from William Cunningham, 5 October 1808\nFrom: Cunningham, William\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir\nFitchburg, Oct. 5th. 1808.\nThe papers, to which you have obligingly ask\u2019d a more particular reference, were published in the Palladium, with the signature of Chatham. I deem\u2019d their composition in a higher strain than my principles suggested, to be necessary to arrert the public attention\u2014in moments of peculiar excitement, the ruling passion is frequently the only avenue through which sober reflections can be conveyed to the judgment, and that pass is often times best secured by a vaporing Herald; but bold and boisterous as mine was, Delusion kept the ground against him. My design, as I communicated it to the Editors in the envelope of my first number, was to shew that neither Mr Jefferson, nor a convert to his crude opinions, would be proper to preside over this Commercial Nation\u2014and to an enlarged view of Commerce, I intended the illustration of its advantages by examples. Objections to Mr. Jefferson brought after them an obligation to specify the qualifications which a free, opulent and an independent people should regard in the choice of their Chief Magistrate. These qualifications are I conceive eminently combined in Mr. A. I spoke of him on a thorough acquaintance with his political course, and it did not escape me that he was the first writer in this country who publickly arraigned the pretensions of Genet; and that his appointment to the Hague was the well-earn\u2019d, but unsolicited, reward of his extrication of the Executive from the embarrassment and perplexities in which he was involved by that hairbrained and contagious Revolutionist. But in addition to a competent capacity, another an indication should be taken from the temper of the times, in which there may be something either to impede or to facilitate \u201cthe march of great talents.\u201d From this consideration, the pretensions of Mr. A. derived, vast accession; it appeared, to me as if Providence, in favour, had caused proof of his patriotism and independence to spring out of his integrity, in a trying situation, for the very purpose of ensuring to his virtues a passage to the Presidency. It was for acting conformably to these impressions that I met the repulse I have before related. The declination of the Editors to print the panegyric was graciously enough expressed in a letter\u2014it was by others that I was reprimanded. In a succeeding number to that which contained the exceptionable matter above (for I sent two numbers at once.) I was so unfortunate as to provoke censure for advancing what is now considered an indefensible tenet in politicks:\u2014in opposition to the opinion of a sprightly author who has lately appeared with the signature of Espriella, I asserted it to be politick in a Nation to associate Manufactures with their Trade, and that it was not too soon to begin, in this country, to link them together. Denied a vehicle for such speculations, I discontinued writing them. Indeed I believe that the presses throughout the country are as much under the controul of a junto, as they are in France under Buonaparte\u2019s licensers.\nThe frankness Sir, with which you have replied to my letter of the 19. ult. encourages me to seek an elucidation of an event, the causes of which I have never seen publickly unfolded, and which Col. Pickering has nearly pronounced inexplicable\u2014I mean his Dissmission. In his last printed letter, he says, you never told him what it was for. I was in Philadelphia soon after that transaction, where I heard, it accounted for in the following manner:\u2014That Mr. Liston, expressing to the Secretary his apprehensions of another mission to France, was quieted by the Secretary\u2019s assurances that another would not be made: That when another mission was soon after concluded on, his aversions to any farther negociation with France were so untameable, and so indecorously expressed as to render him an unfit medium for the communications between the two Governments, and unsuitable to remain in a minesterial station. As this explanation furnished adequate reason for his dismission, I was easy with it, but it cannot give me the satisfaction of your own exposition.\nI have taken the freedom to enclose a news-paper, which contains, on its first page, some observations, written by me, on the manufacture of Cider, which may possibly amuse.\nWith veneration and esteem, / I am, Dear Sir, / Your most obliged Friend & Servant,\nWm. Cunningham, Jun.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "10-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5263", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 10 October 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Rush, Benjamin\nMy dear Sir\nQuincy Oct. 10, 1808.\nThe three Classes of People in Boston, who direct our public Affairs are the Same as those you describe in your favour of 22 of Sept.\nIt gives me great pleasure, to learn that our old Friend Mr Clymer is as he always was a pure-American. I cannot however boldly defend the long Continuance of the Embargo. I thought it at first a necessary Measure, but was fully apprehensive it could not be long continued. I am neither an Advocate nor an Accuser of Mr Jefferson without discrimination. I can acquit him of Partiality to Napoleon, but not entirely, to the french Nation. I have long known his bias to the French and his bitterness to the English. Of Napoleon I have reason to believe he thinks justly.\nMr Jefferson in my opinion has long ago adopted two very erroneous Opinions. 1. That England was tottering to her fall, that her Strength and Resources were exhausted, that She must Soon be a Bankrupt and unable to maintain her naval Superiority. This I never believed and We Shall yet have proofs enough and to Spare of her tremendous Power, though I dread it not. Tom Pains Reflections on the Rubicon and his other Prophecies of British Ruin I personally know were Mr Jeffersons opinions and continued to be So even when he was Vice President. 2. But the Second opinion was Still more erroneous and Still more fatal. He did not Study the French Nation, nor consider the Character of her Court, her Nobility, her Clergy, her Lawyers, her Institutions, and much less the nature of her common People, not one in fifty of whom could write or read. He had Studied so little the nature of Man, and Still less the nature of Government, that he came from France and continued for years, fully persuaded, that that Nation would establish a free Republican Government and even a levelling Democracy, and that Monarchy and Nobility would be forever abolished in France. I have reason to rember those Things, for I have heard him assert them and enlarge upon them, with the utmost Astonishment. I have reason to remember them moreover, because these were the first Topicks upon which We ever differed in Opinions upon Political Subjects. I have reason to remember them too because, his opinions recommended him to the French Revolutionary Government and Nation; and especially to all the French Ambassadors Consulls and other Agents as well as to all other Frenchmen in America, even to Tallerand and the Duke de Liancourt, who all exerted all their influence and all their Presses to exalt Mr Jefferson over my Shoulders, and to run me down as an Aristocrat and a Monarchist. I have reason to rember it too because my opinion of the French Revoloution, produced a coldness towards me in all my old Revolutionary Friends, and an Inclination towards Mr Jefferson, which broke out in violent Invectives and false imputations upon me and in flattering Panegyricks upon Mr Jefferson, till they ended in a consignment of me, forever to private Life and the elevation of him to the Presidents Chair. My Writings were but a Pretext. They knew that neither Aristocracy or Monarchy were recommended to this Country in any of them.\nDecember 19. 1808. Thus far had I written, on the 10th. of October and had planned in my head of a Letter to be composed of more History and of observation on my Friend Mr Whartons Prophecies, which I found would take four or five Sheets of Paper and this Idea frightened me. Tell Mr Wharton that the Prophecies in the old and New Testament were not intended to make Us Prophets.\nYour Favour of December 14 has reminded me of the Project I had begun. My right hand has not been palsied by Pain or Sickness, to Such a degree as to be wholly incapable of holding a Pen, nor have I ceased to contemplate the Crisis of our Affairs. Nor am I fearful of committing my Thoughts to Paper. I could trace back our Errors, but to what purposes? It would be weakness to exult over my Ennemies. It would be Vanity to Sett up my own System as the only one that could have Saved Us. When a Man has been led by a Will with a Whisp into a Salt Pond and has Sunk, like Marius, up to his Chin in mud, it would be madness to waste his time in Disquisitions on the Nature and Properties of those Meteors, in questions whether they are composed of Sulphur or Mephitic Air or fixed Air or Phosphorus or what else. The Question first in order, and which demands immediate Attention is, How shall he get out?\nTo what Purpose, my Friend, is it for me to give my opinion, when every Appearance indicates that it will not be followed now any more than it was in 1800.\u2014My opinion will not be regarded by either or any Party.\nSi velis Pacem para bellum, is by the Federalists Said to be Washingtons Doctrine. So it was and So it has been the Maxim of every Patriot and Hero and indeed of every Man of Sense, who knew the Power of Jealousy and Envy in the human Breast, Since Cain murdered his Brother because he was a more pious Man and more approved by his Maker than himself.\nMy System has always been to prepare for War So far as to fortify our more important and most exposed Places on the Frontier and on the Seaboard, and to prepare for War by Sea So far as to build Frigates and other Smaller Vessels Schooners, and Brigantines, by degrees as our Revenues could afford. So that in case of an unforeseen rupture our immense Commerce might not be all liable to be Swept at once into the Coffers of our Ennemies. To what Use are 100,000 Militia to defend our Merchandize at Sea? To what End are 2 or 300 Gun boats to protect our Commerce? For what Purpose are Ten thousand regular Troops on the Continent of America, for the protection of our ships in the Mediterranian the Baltic the English Channell the Bay of Biscay, or the West indian or East indian Oceans? The Embargo I presume must be relaxed. If not it will either produce a general violation of it, which will cost more than foreign War to Suppress it, or it will turn out of office at least in New England every Man who Supports it. There will not be a Select Man nor a Representative left who will advocate the Administration. The Same Spirit will increase in the middle and even in the Southern and Western States. Mr Madisons Administration will be a Scene of Distraction and Confusion if not of Insurrections and Civil War, and foreign War at the Same time both with France and England if the Embargo is not lightened. Why then are not orders given to equip and Man all the Frigates We have and to build more in all our Great Seaports? It is in vain for me, who Stand unconnected and alone, the object of the Jealousy and aversion of both Parties, to repeat the Opinion which I have uniformly held and always inculcated for more than thirty years that a Navy is our natural and our only Defence. It is infinitely more economical as well as consistent with our Liberties than any other. But as long as the People are encouraged in that pernicious Spirit which will hazard Anarchy foreign and domestic War, rather than pay the Expence of Wooden Walls, though these are infinitely cheaper than regular Troops or Militia which can do nothing We must be the Sport of Fortune. The Chapter of Accidents can alone Save Us. Those who believe that that Fortune and that Chapter of Accidents are under a wise controul, as you and I do must have recourse to their Religion and that alone for their Comfort.\nMy Opinion of Embargoes Non Importation and Non, Exportation Agreements, Non Intercourse Laws, Non Importation Laws &c &c has never varied. In 1774 Congress was unanimously Sanguine two only excepted, that the Non Importation Agreement would procure Us ample redress of all our Complaints. I went with the rest because the People every where were of the Same opinion. But at that very time I Said, in conversation with \u201cThe greatest orator that ever Spoke\u201d as Mr Randolph calls him, \u201cI look upon all this as labour lost. These Measures will be despized and We must fight.\u201d \u201cBy God\u201d Said P. Henry \u201cI am of your Mind.\u201d When Mr Madison Sent up to Senate his Resolutions of Non Importation; I decided the Question in a divided Senate against them. When the present Embargo was laid I was of the Same opinion, that We could give Law neither to England nor France by Such means. Yet I have raised no clamour against these Measures, being determined to Support the Government, in whatever hands as far as I can in Conscience and in honour\nJ. AdamsDecr 20th. I have no Clerk and must Send this Letter without preserving a Copy. Therefore burn it.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "10-13-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5264", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Gabriel Duvall, 13 October 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Duvall, Gabriel\nCopySir\nQuincy October 13 1808\nI have received the Letter you did me the honor to write me on the Seventeenth of September; and in Answer to it I beg leave to inform you, that the account of the fourteen thousand dollars granted on the Second of March 1797 for the further Accommodation of the Household of the President of the United States was Settled before I left Washington, as appears by the enclosed Copy of a Letter to me from Mr Wolcott, Secretary of the Treasury, the Original of which Subscribed by him is now in my possession, and by my Certificate given in consequence of it. The Money that remained unexpended, I returned to the Treasy and the Articles purchased with that which had been expended, together with all the Articles that had been left by my Predecessor were delivered to the Agent appointed by Congress to receive them, before I left Washington.\nHoping that this will be Satisfactory, I am / very respectfully, Sir your most humble Servant\nJ. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "10-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5265", "content": "Title: From John Adams to William Cunningham, 15 October 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Cunningham, William\nDear Sir,\nQuincy, Oct. 15, 1808.\nThe information in your last letter, to look in the Palladium for certain speculations, is very agreeable. As I have never subscribed for that paper, I have never read them. Indeed I seldom see it. Your friendship for J. Q. Adams, encourages me to say, that Washington was indeed under obligations to him, for turning the tide of sentiment against Genet, and he was sensible of it and grateful for it. The enthusiasm for Genet and France and the French revolution, was at that time, almost universal throughout the United States, but, in Pennsylvania, and especially in Philadelphia, the rage was irresistible. Mifflin, M\u2019Kean, and all the principal popular men in that state, were openly for war against England in alliance with France. Marat, Robespiere, Brissot, and the Mountain, were the constant themes of panegyric and the daily toasts at table. Gov. Mifflin invited me to dine with him; Genet and his suite were there, with many others of the principal men of Philadelphia. The Governor gave for a toast,\u2014\u201cThe ruling powers in France;\u2014May the United States of America, in alliance with them, declare war against England.\u201d Mifflin perceived, that I did not drink his toast, and, as I sat next to him, he whispered to me in a friendly way, \u201cI know I shall be too high for you, and therefore no offence will be taken if you withdraw from the company.\u201d I accordingly took French leave. Jonathan Dickensen Sargent and Dr. Hutchinson, two old revolutionary Americans, extremely popular, put themselves at the head of the mob. Washington\u2019s house was surrounded by an innumerable multitude, from day to day, huzzaing, demanding war against England, cursing Washington, and crying success to the French patriots and virtuous republicans. Frederic A. Muhlenburg, the speaker of the house of representatives, toasted publicly,\u2014\u201cThe Mountain, may it be a pyramid that shall reach the skies,\u201d J. Q. Adams\u2019 writings first turned this tide; and, the yellow fever completed the salvation of Washington. Sargeant and Hutchinson died of it. I was assured soon after by some of the most sensible, substantial, and intelligent of the Quakers, that nothing but the yellow fever saved Washington from being dragged out of his house, or being compelled to declare war against England. Not all Washington\u2019s ministers, Hamilton and Pickering included, could have written those papers, which were so fatal to Genet. Washington saw it, and felt his obligations. He took great pains to find out their author. The first notice I had, of his design to appoint my son to a mission abroad, was from his secretary of state, Randolph, who told me he had been ordered to enquire of the members of congress, and others, concerning the life and character of J. Q.\u00a0Adams,\u00a0and, he was, that day, to report in favour of his appointment. His\u00a0correspondence\u00a0with government, and with his private friends, was so universally admired, and especially by Pickering and Washington, that the latter not only felt his present obligations, but remembered the past. I will give you one proof, selected from many, in a letter from him to me, in these words, the original of which, all in his own hand writing, is now before me.\nDear Sir, Monday, Feb. 20th 1797.\nI thank you for giving me the perusal of the enclosed. The sentiments do honor to the head and heart of the writer;\u2014and if my wishes would be of any avail, they should go to you in a strong hope, that you will not withhold merited promotion from Mr. John Q. Adams, because he is your son.\u2014For without intending to compliment the father or the mother, or to censure any others, I give it as my decided opinion, that Mr. Adams is the most valuable public character we have abroad;\u2014And, that there remains no doubt in my mind, that he will prove himself to be the ablest of all our diplomatic corps. If he was now to be brought into that line, or into any other public walk, I could not, upon the principle which has regulated my own conduct, disapprove of the caution, which is hinted at in the letter. But he is already entered;\u2014the public, more and more, as he is known, are appreciating his talents and worth;\u2014and his country would sustain a loss, if these were to be checked by over delicacy on your part. With sincere esteem and affectionate regard, / I am ever yours,\nGEO. WASHINGTON.\nVice-President.\nPlease to recollect who were our ambassadors abroad, at the date of that letter. The presses, in this country, are under party licences. Many pieces in honor of Mr. J. Q. Adams have been refused admittance into all the federal papers, as I have been informed.\nMr. Pickering\u2019s conscience, if it was faithful to its trust, must have suggested to him very sufficient reasons for his removal. If his memory is not decayed he may easily now recollect them.\nC\u00e6sar\u2019s wife must not be suspected, was all the reason he gave for repudiating her. Reasons of state, are not always to be submitted to newspaper discussion. It is sufficient for me to say, that I had reasons enough not only to satisfy me, but to make it my indispensible duty. Reasons which upon the coolest deliberation, I still approve. I was not so ignorant of Mr. Pickering, his family relations, his political, military and local connections, as not to be well aware of the consequences to myself. I said, at the time, to a few confidential friends, that I signed my own dismission when I signed his, and that he would rise again, but I should fall forever. The reason you heard in Philadelphia, was quite sufficient, if there had been no other, but there were many others and much stronger reasons. His removal was one of the most deliberate, virtuous and disinterested actions of my Life. If any future historian should have access to the letter books of the Secretaries of state and compare Mr. Pickering\u2019s negotiations with England, with those of his successor, Mr. Marshall, he will see reasons enough for the exchange of ministers. In consequence of Mr. Pickering\u2019s removal, I was enabled to negotiate and complete a peace with France, and an amicable settlement with England. This is reason enough. Mr. Pickering would have made a good collector of the customs; but, he was not so well qualified for a Secretary of state. He was so devoted an Idolater of Hamilton, that he could not judge impartially of the sentiments and opinions of the President of the U. States. Look into Hamilton\u2019s Pamphlet. Observe the pretended information of things which could have only passed between me and my cabinet. False and abusive as they were, where could he pretend to have derived them? But, I am not yet to reveal the whole mystery. What I have said is to remain in your own breast. I have no disposition to enter into newspaper controversies with Pickering, or his friends or Editors.\nI thank you for your observations on cider, and remain your friend and humble servant. \nJohn Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "10-22-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5267", "content": "Title: To John Adams from William Cunningham, 22 October 1808\nFrom: Cunningham, William\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir.\nFitchburgh, Oct. 22d. 1808\nAnxious as I am for the due appreciation by the publick of the merits of Mr. J.Q.A. the invaluable testimonial of President Washington, contained in your Letter of the 15. inst. could scarcely have been more gratifying to yourself than it is pleasing to me. I perceive, with much satisfaction, that the most essential parts of it may go into circulation without the least hazard to your repose\u2014to that extent I shall not consider myself interdicted in its use by the obligations I owe to the confidence you have reposed in me\u2014I am happy in the thought, that it has been too deliberately reposed to suffer your peace to be disturbed by any fear of my indiscretion.\nI am deeply sensible to your kindness in making me acquainted with many of the reasons for the Dismission of Mr. Pickering. What you have disclosed shall be inviolably kept. If by the expression\u2014\u201cBut I am not yet to reveal the whole mystery.\u201d I am to understand your fixed resolution to make, at present, no farther development, I beg that I may not be suspected of attempting to change it, nor of even entertaining a curiosity to know its reasons\u2014I will only entreat to be initiated into the whole mystery when you may deem it to be proper. But if the disclosure is too interesting to be made but on engagements of fidelity made with more than common solemnity, you may, Dear Sir, consider such an engagement as conditional to a farther communication.\nWith affection and respect, / I am, Dear Sir, / Your Friend & Servant,\nWm. Cunningham, jun.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "11-07-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5268", "content": "Title: From John Adams to William Cunningham, 7 November 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Cunningham, William\nDear Sir\nQuincy November 7th. 1808.\nThe letter of General Washington would have remained in obscurity forever, as far as I know, as it has been for twelve years past, had not a mean vengeance been hurled on the subject of it, for no other offence than his sterling integrity. You are the first person except one who ever asked me a question concerning the reasons for releasing, a certain Gentleman from the burthen of public office. That one was Barnabus Bidwell, in the violence of the tempest occasioned by the Presidential election in 1800. Believing his curiosity to be insidious, I gave him a civil but short answer, that he was a man of too much information not to perceive the impropriety of my complying with his request. Though circumstances are now altered, I shall insist that whatever I write to you upon the Subject, shall be confidential as long as I live.\nWhat is it you require of me? Nothing less than a volume, which I have neither eyes nor hands nor time nor inclination to write, because it must contain the portraits of all my five Ministers; of a Dayton a Hillhouse a Goodhue in the Senate; of an Otis a Sitgreaves a Bayard and a Harper and several others in the house, with a Hamilton behind the scene; of a MacDonald a William Moore Smith Agent for British Creditors, a John Ward Fenno and a Porcupine, Cobbetts and many others out of doors. I have not mentioned a Liston nor a Bond, because whatever their secret influence might be, they were at least discreet. The subterranean intrigues as well as the overt acts must be develloped and described. The gentleman has wreaked his revenge on my Son in letters which Shew the character of the man; bitter and malignant, ignorant and Jesuitical. His revenge has been sweet and he has rolled it as a delicious morsel under his tongue. Suppose I should tell you that the studies of his early youth and of his riper years, had not been competent to the profound investigations, which his office required. We had discussions of great importance with France, England and Spain, especially the two former, Involving questions respecting neutral rights, respecting British and Tory claims of Ante\u2013revolutionary debts. I could get nothing done as I would have it. My new Minister Marshall, did all to entire satisfaction. Suppose I should say he was very superficially read in the law of Nations. Suppose I should say, he was very far from any familiar and extensive acquaintance with the laws of England and indeed of his own land. Who would believe me? The Gentleman himself would believe me, because he is conscious of it, but he would not be likely to confess it in public. Perhaps half a dozen or a dozen men in the Union knew it, but these would be very unwilling to testify to it. Would it be decent, would it be possible for a President to publish such reasons and enter into endless disputes in the Newspapers to support them? His intrigues with Senators in opposition to me, and to measures I had adopted and nominations I had made led the Senators into violations of the Constitution, particularly in the nominations of Mr. Murray, Mr. Gerry, and Col. Smith. His \u00e9charnement against Mr. Gerry whose negotiations were more useful and successful than those of either of his Colleagues, was so furious, that he urged upon me a Report containing a Philippic against Gerry, as violent and outrageous as it was false and groundless. I blotted it out, but he was so angry with me that he scarcely treated me with decency. I finally, however admitted some expressions to pass, which I am now very sorry for. In every step of the progress of the negotiations with France, he opposed obstructed and embarrassed me to the utmost of his power, and in some instances with the secret aid of Hamilton as I suppose, had the art to get all the other four of my Ministers to join him.\nBefore I left Philadelphia I had called together all the five heads of Departments to consult upon instructions to Mr: Ellsworth Mr: Davie and Mr: Murray in their negotiations with France. We had met several days and discussed every point in controversy. We had reasoned and examined and convinced one another, until we had agreed unanimously upon every article and reduced the whole to writing. I gave it to the Secretary of State to reduce it into form, correct the language where it wanted any alteration; make a fair copy and send it as soon as possible to me at Quincy for revision and correction, that I might sign the instructions to be delivered to the Envoys. Arrived at Quincy I expected them by every post. Week after Week passed away, and no instructions arrived. I was uneasy, because our Envoys ought to be upon their passage. After a long time, instead of instructions came a letter to me signed by all five of the heads of departments, advising and most earnestly entreating me to suspend the embarkation of the Ministers. This triffling, this negligence of duty; this downright disobedience of my orders, most seriously alarmed me. I was responsible alone for measures to my Country which I knew to be indispensable to avoid a war abroad with France and a civil war at home, while we were involved and embroiled with England in very difficult controversies and I could get nothing done. I very cooly however preserved my temper and sat off immediately for Trenton to meet my Gentlemen face to face. At Trenton I found the gentlemen had wrought themselves up to a perfect enthusiasm and delusion. They appeared to be fully convinced that the first Ships would bring intelligence of the restoration of Louis 18th. Suwarrow at the head of a Russian Army on one side and Prince Charles at the head of an Austrian army on the other, were to conduct Louis 18th. to Paris and Versailles in Splendor & triumph. I preserved my temper very happily; called my Ministers together; heard all their reasons with the utmost coolness and candor; gave my reasons and opinions in answer to theirs and decided that the instructions should be finished and the Ambassadors embarked as soon as possible, which was done and they brought back peace abroad and at home. I found Hamilton at Trenton; he came to visit me. I said nothing to him upon politicks. He began to give his advice unasked. I heard him with perfect good humour; though never, in my life did I hear a man talk more like a fool. \u201cThe English Nation had the most perfect confidence in Mr: Pitt, and Mr. Pitt was determined to restore the house of Bourbon. The two Imperial Courts were determined to support the Bourbon\u2019s; their Armies were triumphant; Louis 18 would be in glory at Versailles before my Ministers could arrive there. Offence would be taken at my sending a mission to the Directory,\u201d and twenty other wild extravagances in the same style of dogmatical confidence. I answered every one of his topicks with candor and temper in too long a detail to be repeated here. Time has shewn that I was right and he wrong in every particular. They had even wrought upon Mr: Ellsworth to believe that the Bourbons would be restored before winter. He and Mr: Davie at dinner alone with me conversing upon the Subject, Ellsworth let fall an expression to that purpose, when I turned to him and said Mr: Ellsworth do you seriously believe that the Bourbons will be restored so soon. He answered, \u201cWhy, it looks a good deal so.\u201d Upon that I said to them both, Gentlemen you may depend upon it, the Bourbons will not be restored these seven years, if they ever are. I request you seven years hence to recollect what I now say to you, and I supported my opinions by a long argument drawn from the nature and history, of all coalitions, from the waste of the Northern armies by sickness and desertion in France, and that forest of fortifications with which France is every where defended; from the property now possessed by Revolutionary men, and especially, from the enthusiasm and Revolutionary fury that still possessed the people of France. Mr: Ellsworth however behaved with perfect propriety throughout, and Mr: Davie was of my opinion in all points.\nYou shall now give me your opinion whether I was wrong in giving Mr: Pickering his cong\u00e9. He is, for any thing I know a good Son, husband, father, Grandfather, brother, Unckle and cousin; but he is a man in a mask; sometimes of silk, sometimes of iron, and sometimes of brass; and he can change them very suddenly and with some dexterity, as I could shew you in many instances, though I have said little or nothing about him till now for nine or ten years.\nJ. Adams\u2014", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "11-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5269", "content": "Title: To John Adams from William Cunningham, 12 November 1808\nFrom: Cunningham, William\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir.\nFitchburg, Nov: 12. 1808.\nTo my letter of the 22d. ult. I have not been favoured with an answer; indeed my expectations of an answer were not confident, for in case of your disinclination to a farther disclosure concerning Mr. Pickering, the most delicate and intelligible intimation of it could be given in silence, and from that, too, I might infer your assent to another proposition in my letter, which you would not favour with your express approbation.\nWhen the speculations, to which I have lately referred, were published, I did not take the Palladium, but since its establishment as the Government paper, I have received it. In that of last Tuesday, I see that the publication of my pieces is resumed, and from the editorial note which is prefixed, it appears, that instead of six, as I have informed you, the Editors, in Feb. & March, published seven numbers. Of my writings for the press, I do not retain copies, and it was only from recollection, which had not much room to err, that I said it was my seventh number which contained the matter treated by the printers as inadmissible. If, in the insertion of my numbers, they have been numerally correct, they suppressed, in the seventh, my encomiums on Mr. J. Q. A. But, with their files before them, to what inference are they liable if they have not printed a word of that number? I should not hazard a question so pointed at their veracity, and solvible by turning over of a few leaves, if I had not the most entire confidence, that not a single line of it has appeared in print.\nI commenced the papers with the design I have communicated to you\u2014I expected it would hold me to the full length of \u201cDiscourses on Davila,\u201d incapable of their imitation in any other particular. Frustrated, in part, I am embarrassed with a doubt, whether the prosecution of my plan will answer any valuable purpose. I take the liberty to enclose the Palladium which contains number eight.\nPermit me, Dear Sir, to renew through you my Respects to Mrs Adams, and your Family.\nWith veneration and esteem, / I am, Dear Sir, / Your Friend & Servt.\nWm. Cunningham, Jr.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "11-16-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5270", "content": "Title: To John Adams from William Cunningham, 16 November 1808\nFrom: Cunningham, William\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir.\nFitchburg, Nov. 16. 1808.\nThe person who carried to the office my the letter which I had the pleasure to write to you the 12th. inst. brought me yours of the 9th. You may depend, most assuredly, that your disclosures concerning the ci devant Secretary, shall not be divulged while you live, and may the day be distant which shall discharge me to my discretion in the use of the important matter you have deposited in my bosom.\nThe answer which you demand on the question you have referred to my opinion, I give, without hesitation, in the affirmative. I ask myself, what would have been done in such a case by any other person, conscious of his competency to the duties of his high Station, and alive to the responsibility in which it was holden by his Country? What, for instance, would have been done by Cicero? What by the Earl of Chatham? But, if for your conduct there was required the authority of precedent, it was furnished by your predecessor in his treatment of Randolph, and in his answer to the call of the House of Representatives for the papers in the case of the British Treaty. Of what avail to the Nation is the responsibility of the First Officer in the Republic, if his schemes, constitutionally sanctioned, can be frustrated by his Servants? And where is his regard to his honour, his dignity and the interests of his country, if, under the most flagrant instances of their misdemeanour, he will forbear the exercise of his authority over their stations?\nWith affection and esteem, / I am, Dear Sir, / Your Friend & Servt.\nWm. Cunningham, Jr.I have taken the freedom to send herewith another news-per.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "11-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5271", "content": "Title: From John Adams to William Cunningham, 25 November 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Cunningham, William\nDear Sir\nQuincy November 25th: 1808\nI have your favour\u2019s of the 12th and 16th: of the month. The letter of President Washington concerning J Q A. is at your discretion to make what use of it you please. All the communications concerning the other Gentleman made or to be made I confide to your sacred confidence. The great regard I had for your Grandfather and for your Grandmother, who was a beloved Sister of my Mother, and for your father, have induced me, especially as you was the first and the only person, who ever candidly asked me the question to commit to you a few hints concerning a subject on which I have been silent for so many years As against all the vile slanders, which have been published I have never said or written a word in my own vindication, I am not about to begin by a justification of myself for one of the most virtuous actions of my life. If my actions have not been sufficient to support my fame, let it perish. No higher ambition remains with me than to build a Tomb upon the summit of the hill before my door, covered with a six foot Cube of Quincy Granite, with an inscription like this.\u2014\nSiste viator.\nWith much delight these pleasing hills you view\nWhere Adams from an envious world withdrew\nWhere sick of Glory, faction, power and pride\nSure Judge how empty all, who all had try\u2019d.\nBeneath his shades the weary chief repos\u2019d\nAnd life\u2019s great scene in quiet virtue clos\u2019d.\nTo return to the famous Gentleman. He is extremely susceptible of violent and inveterate prejudices, and yet, such are the contradictions to be found in human characters, he is capable of very violent and sudden transitions from one extreme to an opposite extreme. Under the simple appearance of a bald head and straight hair, and under professions of profound Republicanism he conceals an Ardent ambition, envious of every superior and impatient of obscurity. I always think of a coal-pit covered over with red earth, glowing within, but unable to conceal its internal heat for the interstices which let out the smoke and now and then a flash of flames. He has been several years in Senate, but so totally obscure and insignificant as to keep him in an agony. Almost always in a minority of two, three, four or five in thirty-four, rarely saying anything that has been worth reporting, he broke out at last in a rage and threw a fire-brand into our Massachusetts Legislature against his colleague. The stubble was dry and the flame easily took hold. He has an hereditary right to this distinction, I mean a strong desire of celebrity with feeble means of obtaining it. If ever you Should see the Salem Newspapers published forty or fifty years ago, you will find them abounding with the writings of the good Deacon his father in vindication of the rights and prerogatives of the first Church in Salem. He became so emboldened by the noise he made that he wrote and published several letters to the King, subscribed with his own name. One part of the publick was amused, another diverted and a third fatigued with his ostentatious vanity for some years. Some 35 or 36 years ago I was engaged in a cause at Salem Court in which the Deacon was a witness; while he was under examination, though I treated him with the utmost respect and civility, he broke out without the smallest provocation into a rude personal attack upon me. I was then as a Son of liberty, obnoxious to the Judges, to the government, to the British Ministry and to the king. Though I was astonished at the Deacon\u2019s manners I took no notice of them, till I came to examine his testimony in my arguments to the Jury. I then said I could not account for his unprovoked animosity to me, an entire Stranger to him, unless he meant to recommend himself to somebody to whom I was obnoxious, and I should not be surprized if in his next letter to the King he should do me the honour to denounce me to his Majesty. This little folly raised a general laugh at the Deacon\u2019s expence, and as I suppose the Son was present he has never forgiven me. The concatenation of little and great events in this world is often very whimsical and very ridiculous. Have you never seen the Son\u2019s speech to the Indians in 1794 or thereabouts? If you have not I may send you a copy of it. Great light may be thrown upon his character by this document. No man I ever knew had so deep a contempt for Washington. I have had numerous proofs of it from his own lips; yet he appears to the World a devout adorer of him. No man was a more animated advocate for the french; yet now he is as zealous for the English. But enough of this unpleasant subject. Thank you for the two numbers of Chatham, which discover a good deal of reading and reflection. Have you read Bruce\u2019s travels into Abyssinia in search of the source of the Nile? You will find in the 2d volume much learning concerning David\u2019s Commerce with Ophir and Tarshish in gold and silver &ca.\nI am &ca.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-03-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5272", "content": "Title: To John Adams from William Cunningham, 3 December 1808\nFrom: Cunningham, William\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir,\nFitchburg, Dec. 3d. 1808.\nYour favour of the 25th. ult. came duly to hand. What you have already confided to me concerning Mr. P. and what more you may have the goodness to disclose, I shall not impart to any one. I repeat this assurance to relieve the solicitude which I perceive you cherish to have me sensibly impressed with the delicacy and importance of the communications, with which you have honoured me.\nI hope, Dear Sir, that when the great Acts of your Life shall be told in Marble, that your countrymen will recover that just estimation of your worth, which shall consecrate in their hearts through every convulsive scene, the spot of your interment. I have a voucher in the majority of virtue, and in apposite examples, for asserting that it will be so.\nI will get, if I can, the Salem Gazettes containing the anathemas of Dean. P. In the old block I may see the nature of the chip.\nOf the speech of the Straight-hair\u2019d Minister Plenipotentiary to the Indians, I have only some indistinct recollections. I would be much obliged to you for a copy of it\u2014I shall strictly analyze its bearings on the Orator\u2019s character. His contempt of Washington, and advocacy of French fanaticism are facts which, unfortunately, are unknown to the public. I wish my suspicions were obviated or confirmed, that his far-fam\u2019d Report to Congress on our Foreign Relations was not his own unassisted performance. It is due to the deservedly laurel\u2019d head, that the baldness conceal\u2019d under a Cardinal\u2019s Hat, should be exposed.\nI thank you for the reference to Bruce\u2019s Travels. I have some extracts from his books, but I have not the work itself. I am not unacquainted with, though I do not own, a work of much higher worth; but I know not how to speak of the \u201cDefence of the American Constitutions,\u201d without your taking an intimation that you can make me indebted for more than the perusal of it.\nWhen Young & Minns resumed the publication of Chatham, they tendered to me their press as the a channel of communication to the public of my essays. Presuming that this offer would hold them, I concluded to write a few more papers, and to incorporate into one of them some notices of Mr. J. Q. A. To this I was induced by seeing the declination of Mr. Clinton to serve as Vice President\u2014And as the Electors, on the popular side, must make a selection of another for that office, I thought it would be neither impolitic, nor too late to bring Mr. Adams into view thro\u2019 a Federal paper. Accordingly in number XIII, I have spoken of him at some length. The papers containing Nos X and XI I send herewith.\nWith veneration and esteem, / I am, Dear Sir, / Your obliged Friend & Servt.\nWm. Cunningham, Jr.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5273", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Isaiah L. Green, 9 December 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Green, Isaiah L.\nSir\nQuincy Decr. 9. 1808\nI received, yesterday, from the Post Office, under your franc, the nervous Reply of Nine of our Representatives to the certain resolutions. Having read it with pleasure I thank you for your politeness in Sending it to me. while it treats our Legislature with all the respect it deserves, it is written with as much candor and moderation as perspicuity and Energy. The Facts are fairly stated, and the conclusions are so urgent, that I know of but one Answer that your Antagonists can give, and that is \u201cRepeal the Embargo, let us arm our Ships give us letters of Mark, and We will Seek our fortune and fight our Way, in the Mean time build frigates as fast as you can to protect and assist Us and we will chearfully pay Coach Rates, Stamp Duties Land Taxes and bear all other Burthens the War may produce.\u201d\nIf I had not known, by fifty years Experience, the enormous Gullet of Party, I should Scarcely have believed that a Majority of five hundred wise Men of the East, could have Swallowed Such large lumps, as that \u201cin the Embargo Laws only We are to look for the cause of the public distress\u201d and that in their repeal We may look \u201cfor permanent relief.\u201d\nBut in a Letter intended only to thank you for your Civility I am not about to trouble you with political discussions of which I presume you have enough and to Spare.\nI am Sir respectfully your most / humble Servt.\nJ. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-14-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5277", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan Van der Kemp, 14 December 1808\nFrom: Van der Kemp, Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir!\nOlden barneveld 14 Dec. 1808\nTho I have actuall\u00ff nothing interesting to communicate, your kindness Shall make m\u00ff apolog\u00ff, when I indulge a wish of Sending you a few lines. I hope, your health remains unimpaired\u2014and your domestic enjoyments unaltered. These valuable blessings are indeed the utmost, which we can aim to attain here\u2014To live alone for the Public\u2014to endeavor to make Nations wise\u2014and happ\u00ff\u2014approaches vanity\u2014folly perhaps\u2014when not checked b\u00ff Some latent Sparks of Public Spirit\u2014I Should become disgusted with an infatuated ungrateful multitude! But what would have become of America, if you and your friends had been actuated by Such Selfish motives\u2014unwilling to Sacrifice your ease\u2014and place all what was dear to you in life in jeopardy? I know not\u2014If I Should withstand the temptation\u2014when my Country called me up in defence of its rights and Independence\u2014but this I know, that I Should repent of my rashness. Perhaps m\u00ff Stud\u00ffing this Season Europe\u2019s history during the 15 & 16 Cent Spread this gloom over m\u00ff ideas\u2014tho I can not See\u2014what\u2014other effect must follow from the consideration of the histor\u00ff of the last fort\u00ff years: neither is the prospect in futurity more bright\u2014\nMr. Block from Enckhuizen Spent with us a few weeks\u2014This was an unexpected agreable visit. He waits for an opportunity of embarking to Batavia\u2014as a member of the high court of judicature in the Indies\u2014and the promise of direct promotion, at his arrival He is thoroughly acquainted with European affairs, and can unfold a tale, which fills with horror. Never was Similar Despotism established\u2014never continued by Similar means\u2014and yet his colours are allways Softened\u2014as having kissed his hand to the rising moon He is in man\u00ff respects a man of a ver\u00ff respectable character and talents\u2014you must have Seen him at the Hague\u2014He then was Secretar\u00ff of de Gecommi Meerde Raeden van het Noorder-Quartier\u2014one of the warmest and influential friends of the American cause\u2014But he too joined the French in 1795\u2014howewer\u2014he considered the State of his countr\u00ff desperate\u2014Tho he did not then yet See\u2014that a master alone could be its final doom\u2014a master in 1795\u2014if limited\u2014would have been the Saviour of that devoted countr\u00ff\u2014May America, long yet See retarded that fatal period\u2014but is there no reason to fear\u2014that we are ripening with gigantic Steps for destruction\u2014that the axe is already laid at the roots of our Liberty tree?\nAs you have identified yourselves So much with the Dutch\u2014I must place here an Extract of the Journal Politique by J. C. Texier Westmuller\u2014which Newspaper was before the property of our frend Luzac\u2014of which he was robbed\u2014by order of the French Despot.\nLeyde 30 Aug.\n\u201cGouvernor Daendels is arrived at Batavia\u2014\nAll the Ministers of his Majesty the king, have received ordres\u2014to be with their Bureaux at the Royal residence (Amsterdam) before the first of Nov. by which the value of the houses\u2014as well as the rent had risen.\nThe king appointed Van Le\u00ffden van Westbarendrecht, Minister of the interior departement\u2014and Mollerus Minister of the Public Worship\nAs Ladies of the court are appointed My lad\u00ff van Randw\u00ffck, van Zuylen van Nieveld, Cliffort, van der Hoop, Snoekaert, Corver Hooft Schut van Castricum. First Groom Chevalier John Barend Bicker!! Grooms Col. Trip and Schut van Castericum\u2014Chamberlains of the king Corver Hooft and Temmink\u2014Governor of the Palace Marshal Zuylen van Nieveld\u201d\nBesides the Large perriwigs, the Burgomasters are decorated with a Toga and the Pews of honor are rebuild in all the churches\nThe Haring-vessels have not been Sent to Sea this year\u2014by which the Public credit looses infinitely\u2014and the poor crews are reduced to beggar\u00ff\u2014\nThe Public intrests\u2014when due, are paid one half cash\u2014the other in paper mone\u00ff\u2014So too\u2014the payment of all Salaries, pensions, contracts &c the paper mone\u00ff looses already 7 pc.\nIt is permitted to destroy houses, without rebuilding others\u2014only the Proprietors must acquaint the Magistrats with their intention, So that they, if inclined, may take for the Public\u2014paying, what has been offered for the benefit of the ruins. In Enckhuizen have been already three of the greatest and most conspicous houses\u2014one of these right opposite the City Hall (Stadshuys) demolished\u2014and it is to be presumed, that man\u00ff of the principal houses at the Hague, and other cities Shall Share a Similar fate.\nSo that, my Dear Sir! if you and I after a few years more were Suddenly transplanted in the Hague or Amsterdam\u2014we be as much Strangers to the places, as to the Inhabitants.\nCan you instruct me\u2014when and where Machiavel\u2019s arte di guerra is published and printed? What a wonderful genius was that Machiavel\u2014a Profound Politician an elegant historian! his mandragone!\u2014what an excellent comedie\u2014his Novelles! how full of wit and humour\u2014going a par with Aristo\u2019s and Boccacio. I Should wish to peruse his art of war:\nContinue to live content and happ\u00ff\u2014your own heart will bless you with a reward which an ungrateful Countr\u00ff will not bestow,\u2014till you are deaf to its voice. Continue me a Share in your frend Ship\u2014while I remain worthy of it, and permit me, to renew my Solemn assurance\u2014that I remain with the Sincerest respect. / Dear Sir! / Your most ob\u2014and obliged frend!\nFr. Adr. vanderkemp", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5278", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Joseph Bradley Varnum, 15 December 1808\nFrom: Varnum, Joseph Bradley\nTo: Adams, John\nHon\u2019d Sir.\nWashington December 15th. 1808\nHaving seen a Letter over your Signature, Addressed to Mr. Green, I feel myself constrain\u2019d to return You my most Grateful Acknowledgement, for the high & Respectful Compliment, which you have been pleased to pay, bestow, on our Reply to the Resolutions of the Resolutions of the Massachusetts Legislature.\nWe conceived it a duty, we Owed to Ourselves, to Our Constituents, and to Our Country, to make a reply, and we feel high Consolation, in finding, that Our friends approve of the Manner, while we feel Conscienciously Responsible for the Correctness of the Matter, contained in it.\nIt would be Vanity in me to pretend to point out to you Sir, the Numerous Injuries & Insults, which Our Nation have Received from the Europea Belligerents; or the Measures which have been Adopted for redressing those Wrongs: presuming, that they Are all well known to you.\u2014But at this portentous Crisis, both in Relation to Our Exterior concerns, & the Virolence of party Spirit which so lamentably pervades our Own Nation, I hope it will not be considered Amiss in me, to request the Aid of a Gentleman whose Abilities and patriotism, have done so much for the Independence of the Nation, and the happiness of the people, as is well known to have fallen to your Share , in Order, if the Measures which have been taken are incorrect, That I may be convinced of their incorrectness, and through in my might to Recind them, and in Order to form A correct Opinion of the Measures now proper to be pursued. The Opinions of so great a Statesman, would have much weight on my mind, and I have no doubt, on the public mind. And Sir, from these consideration, in connection with my great Anxiety to render the most Service to my Country, that my feble Abilities are capable of, I am constrained to Request your Opinion on the Whole Subject.\u2014Any thing which may be communicated for my Individual Information, being intimated by you, may be considered a Sacred pledge in me, not to disclose it; but I should feel a peculiar pride in Quoting your Sentiments on Our General concerns publicly, so far as you may permit it; And I cannot doubt of the promotion of the National Interest by it.\u2014\nI am Hon\u2019d Sir, with great / Respect, Your Obdt. Servt.\nJ. B. Varnum", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5279", "content": "Title: To John Adams from William Cunningham, 17 December 1808\nFrom: Cunningham, William\nTo: Adams, John\nSince I enjoyed the pleasure of addressing you on the 10th. inst. I have seen two numbers of the Palladium and found them both silent respecting Mr. J. Q. A. Doubtful whether the Editors would publish my encomium on him I retained a copy, which is subjoined, and which shall release your patience from any farther tax on that subject.\n\u201cThe causes of the Embargo originating unperceived, and operating, at first, in concealment, surprised us like a pestilence whose attack we could not instantly parry, and whose ravages we could not prescribe. In a situation so peculiar, to pause and ponder were undoubtedly proper. This is an apology for the Embargo, when it was imposed, to which I have never denied it a title. If this situation was seized by some as auspicious to their the experiment of their anti-commercial speculations\u2014if a foreign dictation led these, or others to its adoption, yet the apology, with respect to the most venal, should qualify suspicion, and it is ample for the justification of those who, acquiescing in the Embargo, were unactuated by the motive, and unmoved by the servility which a vigilant jealousy has decried. It is time that these were rescued from the opprobrium with which this jealousy has covered them\u2014it is a moment of danger, and we should recal every Coriolanus whom we have undeservedly banished. But I shall concern myself no farther than with the case of one in whose political course, intelligence, probably probity, and the high spirit of an American have been remarkably displayed. If party rage has intercepted and thrown aside the tribute to his merit which has been expressed by Truth, its violence can have no present object in impeding the fair examination of his pretensions to the unabated confidence of his countrymen. Against the insinuation that John Quincy Adams\u2019 assent to the Embargo with was contaminated with one or the other of the corrupt motives which are so justly censurable, I would ask neither candour nor charity to defend him; his defence is perfect in his public conduct preceding that assent, in a particular official act immediately succeeding it, and in his public explanation. That he is in favour of the duration of the Embargo, that he considers it a proper abiding \u201crefuge of our violated peace,\u201d cannot be presumed without refusing to his veracity the courtesy which no act of his life can give a colourable warrant for withholding. I have other views than justice to Mr. Adams in his vindication. The cause of rational Liberty is concerned in it, for if opinions must be controuled by the Strength of party, of what use is wisdom, or any mental excellence? Our present awful crisis in concerned in it, for if party rumours have been unjust to reputation, it may be material to its issue that our sober reflections should repair their injuries. Referring to the Life of Mr. Adams as the best witness of his worth, I shall submit the testimony of an attentive and judicious observer of it to those who may be indisposed to the research.\n\u201cPhiladelphia, Feby. 20. 18797\n\u201cDear Sir.\nWithout intending to censure any others, I give it as my decided opinion, that Mr. Adams is the most valuable public character we have abroad; and that there remains no doubt in my mind, that he will prove himself to be the ablest of all our Diplomatic Corps.\u2014The public, more and more, as he is known, are appreciating his talents and worth; and his country would sustain a loss if these were to be checked.\u201d\nGeo. Washington.\u201d\nIt was obligation in union with justice, that dictated this panegyric. The personal safety of Gen. Washington had been much oweing to the arraignment of by Mr. Adams of the pretensions of that pestilential Revolutionist, Genet, who, with Gov. Mc.Kean, Mifflin, Cheif Justice Mc.Kean, Mr. Speaker Muhlenburgh, J. D. Sargent and others, had fomented so much disaffection in Philadelphia as to overawe the deliberations of Congress, and to menace the President. Let the panegyric at least shield the talents of Mr. Adams from the shafts of half-read wits. It is in the simplicity of narrative, and not in the fervour of friendship, that I have Spoken of Mr. Adams\u2014appendant to my subject, it has restricted me to a mode and measure in my praise.\u201d\nI see it asserted in the Boston papers, that the Democratic Electors will vote for Mr. Clinton for Vice-President. In the New York Evening Post of an early date in Nov. I saw an article formally announcing that he declined being a Candidate for that office. I may have admitted it too hastily from an impression long before imbibed that he would refuse to serve in that station.\nMrs. Warren, in her History of the Revolution, vol. II, page 207, has given, in a note, a sketch of the character of the Count de Vergennes, drawn, I presume, by your pen. Before the appearance of this history, I had publickly coupled the venality of Vergennes and the obsequiousness of his American vassals, to explain the cause of an intermission in your Diplomatic career. I am covetous of the information which will enable me to fortify this explanation with the direct proofs of his being a visionary, and of his destitution of moral worth. Mrs. Warren had amassed much information, and where she has confined herself to plain narration she appears very well. In the difficult undertaking of portraying characters she has betrayed her own incapacity, though it must be acknowledged that she has not been unhappy in her delineations in the instances which did not require a deep investigation. She is the most unfortunate when she assumes the umpirage of political division.\nWith veneration and esteem, / I am, Dear Sir, / Your Friend & Servt\n Wm. Cunningham, Jun.\nP.S. As I have not yet received Mr. Pickerings Speech to the Indians, I am fearful that the letter containing it may has been miscarried.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-20-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5280", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Isaiah L. Green, 20 December 1808\nFrom: Green, Isaiah L.\nTo: Adams, John\nSir\nWashington Decr 20th 1808.\n I was highly gratified by the receipt of the letter of the 9th instant which you did me the honor to write me. Your Approbation of the Reply to the Legislature of Massachusetts, and of the measures of the General Government was extremely flattering. The crisis is highly important, but I trust and hope that the Almighty Guardian of America will still protect her against the open attacks and insidious plans, of all her enemies\u2014\n I take the liberty to inclose you the annual report of the Secretary of the Treasury, and am with great respect your very Humble Servant.\nIsaiah L Green", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-21-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5281", "content": "Title: To John Adams from William Cunningham, 21 December 1808\nFrom: Cunningham, William\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir.\nFitchburg, Dec. 21. 1808.\nI have received your favour of the 13th. inst. and give you my thanks for the offer of the 2d. & 3d. volumes of the Defence. If you would be at the trouble of putting them under a blank cover, superscribed with my address and cause them to be left at Wheelock\u2019s, at the sign of the Indian Queen in Marlborough-Street, they will be brought to me by the driver of the Leominster stage\u2014\nI shall be unsusceptible of instruction if experience, much longer protracted, shall fail to convince me of an Oligarchic oversight of the Federal presses.\nYour Advice to imprison in my bosom the friendship I feel for yourself and family, is entitled to all the gratitude which is due to a kind and generous intention, but its observance is impracticable. Although there is no one to whom a place of some profit could be more welcome, yet I have no prospect of any, nor would I take any at the costly price of mental sacrifice. I happened to be at Worcester at the first Court holden after the acquittal of Selfridge. There I was told by Mr. Speaker Bigelow, and others, that I was accused of having apostatized from Federalism. I informed them, that the expression of my firm conviction that Selfridge had been guilty of murder, and ought to have been hanged, was the sole ground of the accusation, and if that was eno\u2019 to constitute a secession from Federalism, I wished to be considered as seceding. But I was not ejected. The great political parties in the State, arranged under their respective standards, on the simple question of the guilt or innocence of an individual, under a criminal accusation, was a curious spectacle. I am thoroughly persuaded of the power of Prejudice\u2014through the heat of party feuds she sits, in regal pomp, in the human breast, dictating, most despotically, its decisions. But this heat must subside, and the tranquil scene succeed, when Reason shall be reinstated in her government\u2014\nAs to Governour, if the democratic party greatly overmatched the other side, there could be no doubt of their adherance to Mr. Lincoln, but equipoised as are the parties. Candidates of the most commanding combinations should be held up. There are two things which, under present circumstances, discourage the friends of Lincoln from supporting him\u2014The first is, that Creation is not only his \u201celder scripture,\u201d but his only scripture. This brings out against him the whole body of the Clergy. The second is, that those most intimate with him, represent him as a man of inadequate attainments, and sanguinary as Marat or Robespierre. I convened yesterday with two of the most intelligent of the Republicans here, and they told me, that notwithstanding their own satisfaction with Lincoln, they should prefer a less exceptionable Candidate\u2014Whom? They answered Mr. Adams\u2014Why? They replied, that of whatever party he is, they were convinced of, and confided in, his capacity, his independence and in his integrity. If Mr. Adams could be chosen, on these considerations, I should hope he would think them so auspicious to a prosperous Administration, as authoritatively to require the sacrifice of every personal consideration. I will apprise you of whatever more I may hear.\nWith veneration and respect, / I am, Dear Sir, / Your Friend & Servt.\nWm. Cunningham. Jun.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-22-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5282", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 22 December 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Rush, Benjamin\nMy dear Sir,\u2014\nQuincy, December 22. 1808.\nI know not whether I shall make you smile or weep, excite your ridicule or pity or contempt when I reveal to you the mistery of my long delay to answer your last Letters. But before I unriddle that unusual negligence, I must say a few words concerning our Friend Whartons Attachment to Prophecies and his habit of applying them to passing events. I have no objection to the Study, but I am aware of extream dangers in applying the Predictions to Characters and occurrences as they appear or approach, and before they are complete and at an end. Public Men especially would make wild steerage were they to judge of Men and things, by their sense of the Prophecies.\nPoliticians, such as Pharisees, Machivilians and Jesuits have often employed interpretations of the Prophecies to excite superstitious Princes and enthusiastic Nations to engage in enterprizes, in no wise calculated for the good of Mankind. The Crusades which lasted two hundred years intoxicated all Europe and cost the Lives of three millions of Men were excited and supported by the Prophecies. The French Prophets too excited great troubles and brought horrible Persecutions upon themselves as well as great Calamities upon others by their presumptuous Prognostications. The Dissenters in England, some of them I mean and Dr. Tower among others, contributed I fear to assist and propagate that democratical Fury which desolated France and has subjugated the continent of Europe, and came very near producing in England a Revolution similar to that of France.\nThe most Atheistical Philosophers of France and of Europe encouraged in secret this engine to work upon popular Credulity and excite popular passions.\nBonaparte and his Politicians are manifestly holding out the Idea of the Restoration of the Jews to Jerusalem, and this delusion preceeded and accompanied his expedition to Egypt, and is still propagated far and wide. Fabers very fashionable Book I consider as a mere British political Pamphlet calculated to excite religious abhorrence in England against Napoleon. The Man may be pious and sincere, so might Archbishop Sand for what I know, but sincerity in error cannot convert it into Truth, and a Mans Passions, Prejudices and even his Patriotism often induce Men to adopt opinions without sufficient evidence.\nIt grieves me to relate an Anecdote of our Friend Dr. Priestley whom I greatly esteemed and sincerely loved, though I think he was seduced by a hot headed Friend Cooper to injure me very grossly. At Breakfast with me alone when I was Vice President, he talked very freely of the French Revolution and with great satisfaction. I heard him a long time in silent wonder, but in perfect good humour, till at last, when he pauzed, I asked him very cooly \u201cDr. Do you really believe that the French Nation will succeed in establishing a free Government?\u201d He answered me with a good natured smile \u201cYes I do believe they will.\u201d I then enquired \u201cUpon what principles and by what Reasons do you ground your opinion? Is not all experience and all History against it?\u201d \u201cWhy I fear it is,\u201d said the Dr. \u201cbut I found my Judgment wholly upon the Prophecies. I understand the King of France to be the first of the ten horns of the great Beast which were to fall off, and I believe that the nine others will fall off after him at no very distant period of time.\u201d \u201cI am very glad to know your Reason, sir, and it is impossible for me to say that it is not sufficient: but it would be dangerous for public Men to hazard any great and decisive critical Measure upon such Information only\u201d was my answer. The Doctor after a little pause added, with a smile \u201cThere is however I confess still some uncertainty attending it, for I was but yesterday reading The Travels of a French Gentleman in England in the year 1659. He had visited all parts of England, and said he found the Nation universally engaged in Deliberations upon the permanent form of Government they were to assume for the Preservation of Liberty for their Posterity. Various Parties were for different forms of a Republick, but all Parties unanimously agreed in this that there should never be Kings, Nobles or Bishops any more in England. Monarchy, Nobility and Prelacy were to be abolished forever. This was in 1659 when the Nation was so unanimous against Monarchy yet in 1660 the whole Nation went mad for Monarchy, Nobility and Prelacy again.\u201d Thus the Dr. I thought as he did that this example had great weight. I was not unacquainted with the passage in the French Traveller, tho I have forgot his name; and the rise, progress and Termination of the civil war in England was very familiar to me. I read very early in Life Clarendon and Whitelock and all the principal writers upon that Period, and I know of no Book of mere History that was ever of more service to me than Clarendon or gave me so much insight into Men and Government, though I knew him to be partial. If our youth would read Clarendon more tho they should be obliged to read Johnson, Hume and Gibbon less there would be no loss.\nWhether the Prophesies, my Friend, are divine, as you and I believe them to be, or whether they are mere human Inventions of learned and ingenious Men as Voltaire his Masters and Disciples represent them to be they profess to comprehend a vast dispensation of Providence beginning with the Creation and ending with the Conflagration of the World. The Universal History of the whole Family of Mankind therefore comes within the limits of this incomprehensible system. Not only the Hebrews, the Christians and Mahometans, but all the other Nations of the earth for all these have been more or less connected with the others, may be traced with a view to illustrate some passage or other in these ancient Predictions. A subject so sublime never fails to engage the attention, and often wholly engrosses it, of every Man of Learning and Genius who indulges himself in turning his Thought that way. It always excites enthusiasm and often transporting visions, and not infrequently Delirium. I do not think it an unlawful study, but I believe it to be a very dangerous one to any Man who is not well fortified with Philosophical as well as Theological Caution. To me it appears Presumption, I had almost said Impiety to pretend to foresee future events through this Telescope.\nHaving named Voltaire I may now explain my long silence. For three or four months I have been in company with such great Personages as Moses, Zoroaster, Sanchoniathan, Confucius, Numa, Mahomet and others of that Rank. In that period I have read four volumes of Voltaires Essai sur les M\u0153urs et l\u2019esprit des Nations and three of his Louis 14 and fifteen, and these led me to read his Bible expliqu\u00e9e, his Philosophy of History, his Sermons, Homilies, Dialogues and a multitude of other Pieces in which his whole stock of Learning, wit, humour, satyr, scurrility, Buffoonery were exhausted. Many of these I had seen before. Indeed all his Materials have been familiar to me for more than fifty years. Morgans Moral Philosopher and some others of the same stamp fell into my hands at Worcester in 1755 and before and after that I had been acquainted with Lelands View of the Deistical Writers. And all my Life time some Deistical writer or other has fallen from time to time into my hands. Nothing new to me therefore has occurred from reading this Fatrass of Voltaire. Indeed I have been somewhat surprized to find that there is nothing new in him. He borrows every Thing from Herbert Blount, Tindal, Collins, Woolston, Shaftsbury, Bolinbroke, and the other English Infidels with a few additions from his Countryman Boulanger and two or three others.\nThe vast extent and variety of Talents which this mortal possessed had given him a Reputation, through the world and his wit and style attracted readers of all Nations. Every Body read his works. His Dramatic Compositions, his Epick Poems, his Historical Works, his astonishing Multitude of fugitive Pieces, his favourite Doctrines of Liberty temporal and spiritual and his daring attacks upon the Pope, the Monastic orders, and the whole Hierarchy of the Romish Church occasioned him to be more universally read than any other author that ever lived. This reputation gave him power to propagate through the world the miserable spoils which he borrowed or stole from the English Infidels with an effrontery more unjustifiable and inexcusable than that of the Hebrews which he censures so bitterly, when they borrowed Gold and Silver and Jewells of the Egyptians.\nIn opposition to him I have been consulting the Letters of the Jews of Portugal, Holland, Germany and Poland.\nNever was poor Culprit more genteely whipped at the whipping post. They have convicted him of ignorance of every Thing he pretended to know and in multitude of Instances proved him to be guilty of the grossest Lies and Impostures as well as of inconsistencies and contradictions innumerable.\nAlthough I have been so highly entertained as to neglect my most precious Correspondent I would not advise him ever to spend his time so idly, at least unless he should ever have as much Leisure as I have, and that I am very sure can never happen.\nI have no Amanuensis and if I had I would not copy this Letter and therefore I pray you to burn it. \nJ. Adams.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5283", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Amos J. Cook, 23 December 1808\nFrom: Cook, Amos J.\nTo: Adams, John\nSir,\nFryeburg December 23d. 1808.\nYour obliging letter of November 30. 1807. I had the pleasure of receiving, soon after its date, containing a copy of Latin Verses &c. in your own hand writing. Such a compliance with my wishes fills my heart with grateful emotions. It adds a stimulous to my exertions to be useful. You will please to accept my thankful acknowledgements.\nAt your request, I present you a translation of the verses, made by one of my pupils, Mr. Thomas Fessenden, aged 18. soon after they were received. This unfortunate youth, however, before he had time to write a copy from his first performance for your inspection, was violently seized with an apoplectic complaint, of which he is not yet entirely recovered. Not being able to copy them himself, I hope, will be some justification, for their coming in my hand, and at this late date. I delayed, hoping that the young man that would recover, that you might the better judge of the performance from his own pen.\nSome of my other scholars translated them in prose. Mr. Fessenden\u2019s, I supposed, would be the more acceptible for its being in rhyme.\nIf, Sir, you should think proper to give me your opinion on the performance, you would make my obligation to you greater than I can express.\nWith sentiments of unfeigned affection and respect, / your very humble servant,\nAmos J. Cook", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-26-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5284", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Joseph Bradley Varnum, 26 December 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Varnum, Joseph Bradley\nSir.\nQuincy December 26th. 1808.\nI receive very kindly your obliging letter of the 15th. of this month. Ever since my return from Europe, where I had resided ten years and could not be fully informed of the state of affairs in my own Country, I have been constantly anxious and alarmed at the intemperance of party spirit and the unbounded license of our presses. In the same view I could not but lament some things, which have lately passed in public bodies. To instance, at Dedham and Topsfield; and last of all in the Resolutions of our Massachusetts Legislature. Upon principle, I see no right in our Senate and House to dictate, nor to advise, or to request our Represenatives in Congress. The right of the people to instruct their Representatives is very dear to them and will never be disputed by me. But this is a very different thing from an interference of a State legislature. Congress must be the \u201cCloud by day and the pillar of fire by night,\u201d to conduct this Nation, and if their eyes are to be diverted by wandering light, accidentally springing up, in every direction, we shall never get through the Wilderness.\nI have not been inattentive to the course of our publick affairs, and agree with Congress in their Resolutions to resist the decrees, edicts and orders of France and England; but I think the king\u2019s proclamation for the impressment of Seamen on board our Merchantships has not been distinctly enough notified reprobated. It is the most groundless pretension of all. Retired as I am, conversing with very few of any party; out of the secret of affairs; collecting information only from publick papers and pamphlets, many links in the great chain of deliberations, actions and events, may have escaped me. You will easily believe, that an excessive diffidence in my own opinions, has not been the sin, that has most easily beset me. I must nevertheless confess to you that in all the intricate combinations of our affairs, to which I have ever been a witness, I never found myself so much at a loss to form a judgment of what the Nation ought to do, or what part I ought to act. No man then, I hope, will have more confidence in the solidity of any thing I may suggest, than I have myself.\nI revere the upright and enlightened general sense of our American Nation. It is nevertheless capable, like all other Nations of general prejudices and National errors. Among these, I know not whether there is any more remarkable than that opinion so universal, that it is in our power to bring foreign nations to our terms, by with-holding our Commerce. When the Executive and Legislative authority of any Nation, especially in the old Governments and great powers of Europe, have adopted measures upon deliberation and published them to the World, they cannot recede, without a deep humiliation and disgrace, in the eyes of their own Subjects, as well as all Europe. They will therefore obstinately adhere to them at the expence even of great sacrifices and in defiance of great dangers. In 1774 Congress appeared almost unanimously sanguine, that a non-importation and a non-consumption association would procure an immediate repeal of acts of parliament and Royal orders. I went heartily along with the rest in all these measures, because I knew that the sense of the Nation, the publick opinion in all the Colonies required them, and I did not see that they could do harm. But I had no confidence in their success in any thing but uniting the American people. I expressed this opinion freely to some of my friends, particular to Mr. Henry of Virginia, and to Major Hawley of Massachusetts. These two and these only agreed with me in opinion, that we must fight, after all. We found by experience, that a war of eight years in addition to all our Resolutions was necessary, and the aid of France Spain and Holland too, before our purposes could be accomplished. Do we presume that we can excite insurrection, rebellion and a Revolution in England? Even a Revolution would be no benefit to us. A Republican government in England would be more hostile to us than the government Monarchy is. The resources of that country are so great; their Merchants, Capitalists and principal manufacturers are so rich, that they can employ their Manufacturers and Store their productions for a long time, perhaps longer than we can or will bear to hoard ours. In 1794 upon these principles and for these reasons I thought it my duty to decide in Senate, against Mr Madison\u2019s resolutions, as they were called, and I have seen no reason to alter my opinion since. I own I was sorry when the late non-importation law passed. When a war with England was seriously apprehended in 1794, I approved of an Embargo, as a temporary measure to preserve our Seamen and property, but not with any expectation that it would influence England. I thought the Embargo, which was laid a year ago, a wise and prudent measure for the same reason; viz to preserve our Seamen and as much of our property as we could get in, but not with the faintest hope, that it would influence the British Councils. At the same time I confidently expected that it would be raised in a few months. I have not censured any of these measures because I knew the fond attachment of the Nation to them; but I think the Nation must soon be convinced that they will not answer their expectations. The Embargo and the Non-intercourse laws I think ought not to last long. They will lay such a foundation of disaffection to the National Government as will give great uneasiness to Mr. Jefferson\u2019s Successor and produce such distractions and confusions as I shudder to think of. The Naval and Military force to carry them into execution would maintain a war. Are you then for war, you will ask? I will answer you candidly I think a war would be a less evil than a rigorous enforcement of the Embargo and Non-intercourse. But we have no necessity to declare war against England or France, or both. We may raise the Embargo, repeal the non-intercourse, authorize our Merchants to arm their Vessells, give them special letters of Mark to defend themselves against all unlawful aggressors, and take burn or destroy all vessels or make prize of them as Enemies that shall attack them. In the mean time apply all our resources to build frigates, some in ever principal Seaport. These frigates ought not to be assembled in any one port to become an object of a hostile expedition to destroy them. They should be separated and scattered as much as possible from New Orleans to Passamaquoddy. I never was fond of the plan of building Line of battle-ships. Our policy is not to fight Squadron\u2019s at Sea, but to have fast sailing Frigates to scour the Seas and make impression on the Enemies\u2019 Commerce; and in this way we can do great things. Our great Sea ports and most exposed frontier places ought not to be neglected in their fortifications; but I cannot see for what purpose an hundred thousand Militia are called out, nor why we should have so large an army at present. The Revenues applied to these Uses would be better appropriated to building Frigates. We may depend upon it we shall never be respected by foreign powers until they see that we are sensible of the great resources which the Almighty in his benevolent providence has put into our hands. No Nation under the sun has better materials, architects or Mariners for a respectable Maritime power. I have no doubt but our people, when they see a necessity will cheerfully pay the taxes necessary for their defence and to support their Union, Independence and National honour. When our Merchants are armed if they are taken they cannot blame the Government; if they fight well and captivate their enemies they will acquire glory and encouragement at home, and England or France may determine for themselves whether they will declare war. I believe neither will do it, because each will be afraid of our joining the other. If either should, in my opinion the other will rescind; but if we should have both to fight, it would not be long before one or the other would be willing to make peace and I see not much difference between fighting both and fighting England alone. My heart is with the Spanish Patriots and I should be glad to assist them as far as our Commerce can supply them. I conclude with acknowledging that we have received greater injuries from England than from France, abominable as both have been. I conclude that whatever the Government determines I shall support as far as my small voice extends.\nI am Sir with respect and esteem Your humble Servt.\nJ A\nN. B. The Tribute and the British licenses must be prohibited under adequate penalties.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-31-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5285", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan Van der Kemp, 31 December 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Van der Kemp, Fran\u00e7ois Adriaan\nDear Sir\nQuincy Decr 31 1808\nIn answer to your kind Inquiries concerning my health, in your favour of the 14th, I can inform you that I enjoy as good health as a Man in his fifteenth Lustre, can reasonably expect, except a little paralytic trembling in the hands, which does not much incommode me however in Writing.\nI have been engaged this Summer as you have in reading History. Voltaires Moeurs et Esprit des Nations and the Histories of Louis 14th and 15th have been for some time my Amusement and Employment. The World has been a Scene of horrors as it is now and ever will be: and all Efforts to enlighten reform or amend it, if they are not wholly lost, will have very little and very Slow Effects.\nMr Block descriptions are no doubt just: but I am very far from despairing of our Commonwealth. I believe that no Axe is laid to the Root of our Liberty Tree, but We may be reduced to hard Necessities in defending it.\nYour Court Kalender, extracted from the Journal Politique is indeed very curious. What would Burgomasters Hooft and Temmink, Mr Van Berkel and Mr Dumas Say if they should read it\u2014I wish you would write a Dialogue between those Personages in the Elisian Fields and express their Sentiments upon this Subject.\nHow are our public Interests paid in America, instead of a depretiation of Seven Per Cent as in holland, our Medium is depreciated two or three hundred per Cent.\nWhat can be the motive for demolishing Houses?\nMachiavels Art of War is in the fourth Volume of an English Translation of Machiavels Works, published in London in 1775. Printed for T. Davies, Russel Street Covent Garden; J. Dodsley Pall Mall; J. Robson New Bond Street; G. Robinson Pater Noster Row; T. Becket T. Cadel and T. Evans, Strand. The Translator was Ellis Farnesworth M.A. Late Vicar of Rosthern in Cheshire. Translator of the Life of Pope Sixtus 5, and Davilla\u2019s History of the Civil Wars of France. 2d Edition corrected in four volumes.\nI may now inform you that you have been elected a Member of the Massachusetts M Academy of Arts and Sciences, and I hope you have received a Diploma. If you have not it has been owing to the corresponding Secretary\u2019s having too much Business.\n\u201cWhat a wonderful Genius was Machiavel\u201d? you exclaim. Wonderful indeed. What a wonderful Genius was Hobbs? Priestley? Bonaparte? Voltaire? all very Strange Genius\u2019s however. I have read this last fall half a dozen Volumes of this last wonderful Genius\u2019s Ribaldry against the Bible. How is it possible this old Fellow Should represent the Hebrews in Such a contemptible Light? They are the most glorious Nation that ever inhabited this Earth. The Romans and their Empire were but a Bauble in comparison of the Jews. They have given Religion to three quarters of the Globe and have influenced the Affairs of Mankind more, and more happily than any other Nation ancient or modern.\nThere\u2019s a flight for you! more extravagant you will Say than any thing in Voltaire! Tel me why?\nThis Vault of Air, this congregated Ball\nSelf center\u2019d Sun and Stars that rise and fall\nThere are, my Friend whose Philosophic Eyes\nLook through and trust the Ruler with his Skies.\nOn the Brink of the Precipice I am not afraid to look down and to leap at the Word of Command.\nYours to the last\nJ. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-31-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-02-02-5286", "content": "Title: To John Adams from William Cunningham, 31 December 1808\nFrom: Cunningham, William\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir.\nFitchburg. 31st. Dec. 1808.\nEnclosed is a News-paper containing, under the Worcester head, a copy of some remarks made at a Meeting of this Town. The author is so plainly indicated by the style of his address, and by his initial, that it is unnecessary, and might appear ostentatious, to be more particular.\nWith affection and gratitude, / I am, Dear Sir, / Your Friend & Servt.\nWm. Cunningham, Jr.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1629", "content": "Title: From John Adams to John Quincy Adams, 8 January 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nMy great and good Son\nQuincy January 8. 1808\nThe distance between Us, the total retirement in which I live and the Want of Facts, render a Correspondence between Us, upon public affairs of very little use to you, though it is a great pleasure to me. The Storm that has agitated the Elements for twenty Years in Europe must be drawing towards a Conclusion, and the last blasts may be the fiercest of all. We have been favoured by Providence beyond our deserts in five and twenty years of Peace. But the last Waves will dash upon Us.\nYour Situation you think critical. I think it is clear, plain and obvious. You are supported by no Party. You have too honest a heart, to independent a Mind and too brilliant Talents, to be Sincerely and confidentially trusted by any Man who is under the Dominion of Party Maxims or Party Feelings,: and where is there another Man who is not.? You may depend upon it then that your fate is decided. You will be countenanced neither by France, Spain or England. You will be supported neither by Federalists or Republicans. In the next Congress, Dr Eustis will be chosen Senator, and you will be numbered among the dead like Jay, Elsworth, King, Ames, Dexter and an hundred others of the brightest Geniuses of this Country. You ought to know and expect this, and by no means to regret it.\u2014Return to your Professorship but above all to your Office as a Lawyer devote yourself to your Profession and the Education of your Children.\nHaving explained to you my sincere Judgment of the Consequences of your present and past conduct, I shall now tell you that I fully approve it. Your Votes for Gun Boats, and Non Importation Laws, ridiculous as are the objects I consider as mere compliments to the silly humours and ignorant Notions of the People at a time when all depends upon them. These measures considered on the great national Scale can do little good or little harm. The Aggression Bill I cannot think \u201ctoo high toned for our Situation, nor too hazardous to our peace. If Resentment of such Slaughters as that, of Pearce and those in the Chesapeake, is not excited in our bosoms and cannot excite Us to assert our own Jurisdiction We are degraded People\nThe Embargo I cannot blame, though I know its duration must be short. That of 1775 and that of 1794, I had opportunity to observe.\u2014Yesterday, about an hundred Sailors marched in Procession, in the Streets in Boston, and the same will be done in every Seaport very soon. You may as well drive hoops of wood or iron on a Barrell of Gunpowder, to prevent its Explosion when a red hot heater is in the Center of it, as pretend to enforce an Embargo on this Country for six months. It would be utterly impracticable, if you had a regular army of ten thousand Men employed with all their Bayonettes and balls to keep the Peace. We bought the best of butter yesterday for a Shilling which has been long sold for one and six pence or two Shillings. A Drove of Store Swine was sold yesterday for five Cents which used to be sold for Eight or ten. If our Country produce has fallen already fifty per Cent, you may infer what will happen in a few months. Repeal or War will be the only Alternative, very soon. We shall save what We have on hand and all that shall come in. But arming our Merchantmen, unless they sail in Fleets, and even then will be but frail protection. You will be compelled to give Letters of Mark, and build frigates. Your Gun boats will never be built.\nBefore the British Proclamation appeared, I thought that Peace might be preserved. Since that Event I see no possibility of it. We may submit to the annihilation of our Naturalization Laws, and to Empressment of our Seamen from our Merchant Vessells for a Year or Years but every Instance of it will be complain\u2019d of to our Government, to whom it will be a perpetual Source of Vexation and humiliation as well as to the People and the whole Nation. It will keep alive an eternal hatred between the two Countries, and End in a War at last. I agree with you We ought not and cannot Suffer this New Encroachment, nor do I know how We can take a Stand against it, unless by Resolutions of both Houses of Congress and Remonstrance of the President against it, as a new and unjust Interpolation into the Law of Nations, made by arbitrary Power against America alone, and distinguishing her from all other Nations. Impressment of Seamen by the Law of Nations! What a daring Act of Despotism! What Impudence! This Style is not proper for a Public Man: but it is only calling a Cat, a Cat.\nI believe I have said to you, and I know I have said formerly to your Colleague Mr. Pickering, to Mr. Woolcot and McHenry, and others, that there was no distinction between Ships of War and Merchant Ships, in this respect. If the Britons have a right to impress Seamen, from a Fishing Smack they have the same right from an hundred and twenty Gun Ship. The Deck of a Jolly Boat, at Sea, is as much the Territory of its Sovereign as the hold of a seventy four, and as much under its Jurisdiction, as the House of its Ambassador in a foreign Country. Children born on board Merchant Ships at Sea, are considered as natural born Subjects or Citizens of the Power to which they belong. Elizabeth Breisler who was born at Sea, half way between England and America, is as good a Citizen of the United States as Joseph Arnold Junior, her Husband who was born in Quincy and never was out of it, farther than Boston. This little domestic Anecdote will illustrate the Argument as well as any thing more Solemn.\nWith all due respect for his Majesty the King of England I cannot justify his Proclamation from the Charge of Usurpation and arbitrary Power by the Constitution of his own Kingdom. Nothing short of an Act of Parliament could authorize his Navy officers, to impress a Seaman out of any foreign ship. And if one of his subjects on board such a Ship, should kill a Midshipman in self defence it would be justifiable Homicide by their own Laws. On the contrary if an English officer should kill an English sailor, in attempting to impress him from an American Vessell, it would be Murder. And this Proclamation could not be pleaded in Justification or Excuse of the Crime. Such Killings on both Sides will often happen, and the Ears of the two Nations will be dinned with the Clamour about them forever. I am very willing to keep the affair of the Chesapeake distinct from all other Points. Perhaps We ought to be satisfyed with the Concession they have made upon this Point. They have reserved only the Liberty of representing to our Government, and this I shall hardly wish them to give up, if our Government will be so impolitick as to suffer deserters to be enlisted in any of our ships of War or Commerce. Une Pomme gat\u00e9, gatera bien d\u2019autres. We shall not be obliged to comply with their representations, nor can the President surrender a Deserter without a Law of Congress.\nMichael Corbett and three other Irish Sailors, coming in from Sea on board a Vessell of Mr Hoopers of Marblehead, were attacked fought by Lt Panton and a Midshipman of the Rose Frigate at the head of a Presgang. The Sailors retreated to the Forepeake, and there, armed with such Instruments as they could snatch in their flight, stood upon their defence. A Parley ensued. Corbett said I know you are a Lt of a Man of War, come to impress Us. We are determined to defend ourselves. You have no right to force Us. We have retreated far as We could. We can go no farther. Much altercation ensued. Some attempts were made to break down the Bulk head and the Midshipman in Confusion fired a Pistol and wounded one of the four Sailors in the Arm. This the Lt reproved, but attempted to enter. Corbett thrust him back, and marking a Line in the Cargo of Salt in the hold, said if you step over that mark again I shall take it as a proof of your determination to impress me, and by the eternal God of Heaven you are a dead Man.\u2014Ay my Lad says Panton, I have seen a brave fellow before now, took his Snuff box out of his Pocket, and snuffing up a pinch, resolutely stepped over the Line. Corbet instantly threw an Harpoon Iron, which cutt off the Carrotid Artery and Jugular Vein. Panton cry\u2019d the Rascall has killed me and fell, dead in a few minutes.a Reinforcement came to the Press Gang, and the four Men were taken. They were tryed by a Special Court of Admiralty according to the Statute. Governor Bernard Presided, Mr Huchinson then Lt Governor and Chief Justice, Governor Wentworth of N. Hampshire, Mr Auchmuty Judge of Admiralty, Commodore Hood, now Ld Bridport, and many others were the Judges. I prepared long Special Pleadings in Behalf of the Prisoners, demanding a Tryal by Jury, but these were overruled as I expected.\nUpon the Tryal the Evidence of all the Facts was very clear. I was much affected by the Testimony of the English Sailors. Their Attention to their Oaths and punctual Veracity and impartiallity was very striking. Not a circumstance which made against themselves was concealed or disguised.\nI had prepared an elaborate Investigation of all the Doctrines of Homicide in the Civil Law as well as common Law, and the Statute which expressly forbid Impressment in America. The Civil Law Authority on which I relyed the most was Gail, Foster, Hawkins Ld Coke in the Common Law. But I had not advanced far in my Argument, before Chief Justice Hutchinson arose and moved an Adjournment of the Court till the next Day. His secret motives were two 1st. To prevent me from reaping an Harvest of Glory. 2. To avoid a public Exhibition of the Law in all its details before the People.\nNext Morning Governor Bernard arose and said that the Court had been together in private and as they were all of one Mind they judged it unnecessary to proceed further in the Consideration of the Law or the Evidence, and had ordered him to pronounce, the Action of the Prisoners Justifiable Homicide and the Sentence not Guilty. Not a Word was said by any other Judge.\nI brought an Action for the wounded Sailor against the Midshipman, and received a Letter from Commodore Hood asking favour, for his Midshipman as being worth nothing but his small Pay and offering to give my Client the place of Cook on board the Rose, worth twenty five Guineas a Year. This he refused because he had fallen in Love and would be married. The officers gave him such Satisfaction as he demanded and he wrote me orders to drop the Action: and Sailor like, without ever paying my Fees. This Negligence made me laugh but gave me no Pain.\nI had ample minutes of my Researches in this Case, but like all my other Briefs, they are lost. The only Minutes left are the Report of the Tryal on Writs of Assistance, which Mr Minot has preserved in his History. And this was saved by the Roguery of a Clerk.\nI was amused with the feelings of the Sailors, of the Crew of the Rose. I met many of them in the Street and on the floor of the Court House, who could not conceal their Joy at the Acquittal of my Client. Some of them thanked me for my noble Conduct as they called it, in behalf of those brave fellows. One of them a Boatswain who had been a Witness, and given his Testimony with remarkable coolness and candour, to the Satisfaction of every Body, said to me \u201cSir I have been almost constantly employed for twenty Years in Work of this kind, impressing Seamen, and I always thought I ought to be hanged for it, but now I know it, yet I cant help it.\u201d\nI dont believe there is a Jury in England at this day who would not justify a Sailor in Resistance and condemn an officer for an Impressment. When I was in England, a Committee of the City of London or of the Merchants of that City were before the King in Council. Thurlow then Chancellor said\u2014this Practice of Impressing is legal. The Committee by their Chairman answered \u201cWe acknowledge the high Authority of your Lordships opinion, but We cannot concurr in it.\u201d\nJudge Foster in his Crown Law, has assembled every Colour of Argument and Authority to support the Legality of Impressment of Seamen. Read it. You will find that it is only in Case of a Special Warrant from the Admiralty or King in Council that Impressments are countenanced and that only within the Rivers Harbours and nearest Seas.\nA right or Pretension so equivocal and contestable in their own Country and by their own Laws, can never be transferred into the Law of Nations without the Consent of all the World, a more groundless pretence was never advanced. They might as justly claim from all our Vessells at Sea, the Ship Money of Charles the first or his Loans and Benevolences. They might as well set up their Star Chamber and high Commissioned Courts.\nBy the Laws of England Allegiance and is perpetual and inallienable. What then? You have or ought to have the Power of Commanding the Allegiance and Obedience of your own Subjects. By our This Doctrine may be feudal, may be ecclesiastical. It may be implied by the old Doctrine of the divine Right of Kings. It may have descended with the holy oil with which they are anointed and consecrated. We acknowledge no such Law divine or human. By our Laws, it is allowed to any Englishman Irishman or Scotchman to renounce his Allegiance to the King and become a naturalized Citizen and then We are bound to protect him. If you get him into your territory You will do with him as you please: but you shall not come to Philadelphia from Sea nor to Pitsbourg by from Canada and steal him nor take him by force. If you do, We will arrest you and try you and punish you by our Laws not by yours. We would do the same at Sea, if We could. But want of Power takes away no right.\nI see no difference between the Cases you have stated. A recruiting officer from Canada might as well come within our Lines, and take away a Man by force and make him a British Soldier. A recruiting officer in Liverpool, Hallifax or Jamaica might as well go on board our Ships and take away their Sailors to make them Soldiers. There is just as much reason and Justice, in interpolating a Right of impressing Soldiers as Seamen, into the Law of Nations. It is in vain to look into Books on the Law of Nations, relative to this Subject: because so absurd and extravagant a Pretension was never thought of by any Nation in the World, till now.\nThe Policy of the Romans was very different. They allowed even their capital Criminals to banish themselves. The Priviledge, the Honor the Glory, the Power and Security of a Roman Citizen was held to be of such inestimable Value, that no Man would voluntarily renounce it. To take it away from him was to many a punishment worse than death.\nThe Word Plagiat, I do not find in any Book but the French. Kidknapping you may find in the American Encyclopedia. Plagium, you may find in Calvin\u2019s Lexicon Juridicum, in Stephens\u2019s Dictionary and all the other Dictionaries.\nIn the Dictionaire de Trevoux. Tom. 6. Plagiat. Crime du Plagiaire. Plagiaire. s.m. Plagiarius. Dans les Lois Romaines, ceux qu\u2019on appelloit, Plagiarii, etoient des Seducteurs, ou des especes de voleurs, qui attiroient, retenoit, achetoient ou receloient les enfans de famille, de l\u2019un ou de 1\u2019autre Sexe, pour les depayser pour les vendre et les negocier, a l\u2019inscu, et contre le gr\u00e9 de ceux \u00e0 qui ils appartenoient. De la, par Similitude, et par extension, on appelle Plagiaire, chez nous, celui qui pille derobe les ouvrages d\u2019autrui pour se les approprier.\nFabri Thesaurus. Plagium proprie, crimen, quo quis sciens liberum hominem, aut alienum mancipium, dolo malo vendit, emit, donat, celat.\nCalvins Lexicon. Plagium est, cum quis, hominem ingenuum vel libertinum invitum celat, vinctum habet, dolove malo sciens emit, aut in earum rerum aliqua Socius est, vel cum Servo alieno, Serv\u00e6ve persuasit, ut a domino dominave fugeret, Servum Servamve invito domino dominave celavit, vinctum habuit dolo malo sciens emit, quive in ea re Socius fuit. Hinc plagiarii sunt, qui furantur homines liberos vel Servos eosque vendunt, aut iis persuadent, ut a parentibus vel dominis suis aufugiant.\nPlagiariorum poena olim erat pecuniaria, qu\u00e6 propter Sceleris frequentiam in Usu esse desinit: postea capitalis esse c\u00e6pit, et plerumque exilium, sive in metallum damnatio. Sane hominis liberi Suppressio, p\u0153nam habet mortis, qu\u00e6 p\u0153na etiam Sacris litteris est consentanea. Deut. c 24.\nThe Britons had better, devise a new Article or Title in the Law of Nations and call it The Right of Britons to Kidknap Americans. There Custom of Impressment from their own Ships is not more legal, than the Dutch Custom of Kidknapping Men for Inhabitants of Batavia\nWhy should not these modest Gentry set up a right to Kidknap Us all who were born before the Revolution. We have all the indelible Character of British Subjects. The King could not absolve Us from that Allegiance under which We were born, according to the English Law. Why should they not kidknap your Unkle Cranch who has been sixty Years in this Country and begotten a Son and Daughters. The Pretension is so much the more extravagant as it is inconsistent with their own whole Conduct towards other Nations, and the System of their Laws. They have passed many Acts of Parliament, which you will find in the Statute Book granting various priviledges to foreign Seamen, and declaring such of them as shall serve a certain number of Years to be naturalized and entitled to all the Priviledges of British Subjects. Frenchmen Spaniards, Sweeds Danes Portuguese &c have the indelible Character of perpetual, inherent, unalienable Allegiance to the Kings in whose dominions they were born yet an Act of Parliament can absolve them. Why not then an Act of Congress or the Constitution of the United States.\nYou and I cannot follow our federal Friends, if We ever had any such, in their present Doctrines and Politicks. Yet on the other Side a close Connection with France is to be dreaded. Intrigues like that of Beaumarchais, and that of X Y. Z to pillage Money into private Pocketts and other Intrigues of Courtiers will aim at gaining Advantages of Us in Negotiation. But by employing such Ambassadors as Arthur Lee, Ralph Izzard, John Marshall, C. C. Pinkney and Elbridge Gerry, and above all John Jay, We may as We ever have prevented them from gaining any great Advantage to our Injury.\nMy System of impartial Neutrality might have been pursued and this War avoided. J. Randolph might well say that they ought to go to Braintree and ask pardon of John Adams for opposing him, in his Plan of foreign Affairs.\nThere is no Law or Usage of Nations which forbids an American Merchant or Master of a Vessell, from engaging by Contract any foreign Seaman not ever a Deserter, to serve as a Sailor upon a lawful Voyage. Nor is there in England. On the contrary there are by many Statutes granting Rewards and Encouragements to Merchants to employ, to Officers of the Navy to enlist foreign Seamen without limitation, and to any such Seamen to enlist and serve.\u2014Such Seamen are undoubtedly engaged, in honour, Conscience and Law to serve by such Shipping Paper, and their personal Service is a Right, and why should it not be called a Debt? it is an undoubted duty. Deserters to be sure, must have contracted inconsistent Engagements. They are bound in duty to serve, according to their first Contract and especially according to their Oath.\nAs to electioneering you and I may as well have nothing to do with it: but if I must vote for Madison or Monroe I should not hesitate to prefer Madison as at present informed. It is not worth while for the Federalists to name any Man. They are dwindled down to an handful of Disciples of Hamilton, and their System of internal Government is not much better than that of our present Rulers, their Ideas of foreign affairs I fear are not so good. If our present Rulers would not garble the Constitution and would let Us have a reasonable Revenue, fortifications Ships and Trops I would not quarrell with them at all.\nI hope Wilkinson and Randolph will not meet in the field of honor. I feel so much regard for both of them that I should be very sorry to hear that either was killed or wounded.\nWe are all pretty well\u2014John especially\u2014Love to all where it is due. Ever yours\nJ. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1630", "content": "Title: From John Quincy Adams to William Smith Shaw, 8 January 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Shaw, William Smith\nMy dear Sir.\nWashington 8. Jany: 1808.\nI send you occasionally, the public documents of the most interesting nature, but I have not the opportunity of writing to you so frequently as I could wish\u2014My time is so much engross\u2019d by business equally unpleasant and important that I can very seldom catch a moment for my private affairs, or the more agreeable communications of friendship\u2014I believe I have repeatedly told you as much, before, but what we continually feel, we are apt sometimes unconsciously to repeat.\nI now enclose you an order for $350 on the branch Bank, which I will thank you to deposit at the Bank, and have placed to my credit in Bank\u2014You have my Book in your possession.\nMr: Rose is not yet arrived\u2014There is something singular in his detention, the cause of which is not yet explicitly known.\nYour\u2019s truly.\nJohn Quincy Adams.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1631", "content": "Title: From Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to John Quincy Adams, 10 January 1808\nFrom: Peabody, Elizabeth Smith Shaw\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nMy Dear Nephew,\nAtkinson. Janry. 10th. 1808.\nMr Peabody, & your Aunt, were much gratified last Fall, by a visit from your venerable Parents, who presented me with a Letter from you, requesting our parental care & attention to your eldest Son. With heartfelt pleasure, I received the precious Charge, considering it as a pledge of your regard, & former affection; & of the Opinion you still entertain of my Integrity, in discharging the important Offices, incumbent upon those, to whom the Education of Youth is committed.\u2014\nEvery day, I am more convinced that the very earliest periods of Life, are the best time to check the turbulent Passions, to sow the seeds of Knowledge, Virtue, & Religion; to impress upon their infant minds, that the great Object of Life, was to do good; that our beneficent Creator, did not send us here, merely to walk the Earth, to gaze, & draw fresh air, but gave us Time & Intellects to improve, great and important buisness to perform; & that the Ultimate view of Instruction, was to render them Useful & happy\u2014\nYour Son is a lovely Child\u2014He appears to have more regard to truth, & justice, than is common to one of his age.\u2014Many things which he says, appear to be the result of thought, & principle; which to me, is peculiarly pleasing, for half the Evils we suffer, are because we do not accustom ourselves to thought & reflection.\nMaster George claims my promise, that when he had commited the English Accidence to memory, & began to Pars, I would write, & inform you, & his Mother of his proficiency. He really learns very well, is fond of reading, & often comes home from the Academy, delighted by the encomiums of his Preceptor, when he tells him, he learns like a Hero\u2014for he is charmed, with everything martial.\u2014\nI have frequently written to your Mother, & requested her to inform you, respecting your Sons Health\u2014But I presume, it will not be an unpleasant Task to hear particularly from your Son by a letter, from an absent Aunt, who always loved you as her Nephew, & Friend; & revered you, for clasical and scientific Knowledge, which you have early devoted to your Country, & which claims your Talents as a Statesman, a Philosopher, & a Patriot. And, while you view with contemplative Eye, the Causes, by which Empires rise, & fall, you cannot but breathe a Sigh, responsive with the Fathers of Columbia, & weep over the fair Edifice of virtuous Liberty, which has lost its \u201cstability,\u201d & now totters to its Base.\u2014\nMay Heaven preserve us, from the envenomed arrows of civil Discord,\u2014may the sword never be unsheathed but for the defence of our natural Rights\u2014never, to aggrandize a fellow Worm\u2014nor to monopolize Wealth, or to extend dominion over a vast Territory.\u2014\nAnd, may the cloud which now darkens our Horison, & casts a deep gloom over every Face, be dispelled, by the energies of united Wisdom; & Peace, still, extend her Olive Branch, over an happy Nation.\u2014\nYou will be so kind as to present my Affectionate regards, to my much loved Nephew, Judge Cranch, & his Family,\u2014& to Mr Quincy, who appears an able & zealous advocate for his Constituents.\u2014\nMaster George begs you would accept of his dutiful love, he cannot Yet write well enough, to tell you himself\u2014but hopes to very soon, he wishes me to tell his Mamma he is well, & very happy.\u2014My Daughter pays great attention to him, & he is good Lydia\u2019s Favorite.\u2014We have a post Office very near, & if you could sometimes be good enough to send a Washinton news paper, it will please both him, & Mr Peabody / & your Aunt, who with esteem, & affection, / Subscribes,\nElizabeth Peabody\u2014", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1632", "content": "Title: From John Adams to John Quincy Adams, 17 January 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nMy great and good Son\nQuincy Jan. 17. 1808\nAs I know you hold a higher Rank in the intellectual Scale and a more estimable Situation in the moral Gradations of the Universe than Admiral Nelson, I know of no reason why I should not borrow his Fathers Epithets and for once or twice bestow them upon you.\nI, who perhaps ought to be indifferent to all Things in this World, and certainly Should conscientiously resign all Men Measures and Events to Providence, must acknowledge myself to be not less anxious about public Affairs, than in my Youth or middle Age. I know not but I am as Solicitous about your responsibility as I was formerly for my own: and the public affections are the same as ever\nYour Vote for the Gun boats, I have Supposed arose from your desire to have Some thing done, and your despair of having any Thing better: a general opinion too that the Administration ought to be Supported in their own measures, if nothing more could be obtained, might influence you. But certainly you cannot be insensible of the Imbecility of the Measure. A Short Essay has been printed in New York, and reprinted in the Centinel and Fred. Town Herald, written by my Old Friend Captain Talbot, in which the futility and Extravagance of them has been demonstrated beyond all possibility of Refutation. They could not have been better exposed to contempt, unless by Adding from Moliere, I will not look to See whether it is in The Femmes Scavantes or in the Precieuses ridicules, the Story of the two Lackies who assumed the Dress Arms and Airs of a Marquis and a Count, imposed themselves upon the Ladies for fashionable Wits, and in recounting their Services, one of them Says to the other \u201cI remember at that time you commanded a Brigade of Horse on board the Gallies of Malta. Certainly Brigades of Horse, will be necessary to make our Naval Armament of much Utility towards our Defence. I do not however blame you for voting for them, the Money is appropriated, and that is a great Point gained. The Boats most certainly will not be built, and the Appropriation may hereafter be changed for Frigates.\nThe Embargo is a Stroke instantaneously felt, and will be more and more irksome every day. The Gazettes, in opposition, will continually expose the miseries resulting from it and will increase in their Zeal, their pathetic lamentations, their bitter Sarcasms and their rhetorical Exaggerations and uncandid misrepresentations, till they make the measure unpopular and raise a clamourous resentment against those who voted for it, and especially against you. This you must have foreseen and you must fortify yourself with Patience to bear it. I will not presume to conjecture how long this Stagnation of Business can be borne, but I certainly know it will not be tollerated many Months. Congress will be forced to the Alternative, of granting Letters of Marke letting loose Privateers and Sending out Frigates, or repealing the Law. How it will opperate to Sing the Simple Palinodia I leave you to judge. What Sentiments but contempt and ridicule can it produce in England France Spain and indeed all Europe? What but Scorn and Insolence and Tryumph in those who have opposed and vilified the Measure?\nIf England Should be wise, which however I cannot very confidently expect, She will not declare War against Us. This Congress and this Administration I am convinced will never declare War against her. We shall remain therefore in this State of Inactivity, till the People will burst open the Doors We have closed upon the ocean, either by overawing Congress, or by down right Disobedience to the Laws. My Advice to you is, stedily to pursue the Course you are in, with moderation and caution however, because I think it the Path of Justice. B But you must e\u2019er long Vote for the repeal.\nBut You and I must have a care what We Say or do. We are in an Enemy\u2019s Country, because We are mere Americans, and Such at present have few if any friends. Already has a Scribbler of french Paragraphs Sent all the Family of Adams to Cayenne by a future decree of Napoleon, and the Other Side may as well Send Us to Botany Bay by a Proclamation of the King of Great Britain. Future Ages however will do Us Justice if the present Should not. Park has denounced You as No Federalist, and I wish he would denounce me in the Same manner, for I have long Since renounced, abdicated and disclaimed the Name and Character and Attributes of a T that Appellation Sect as it is now applied appears. We have no favour to expect from France or England nor from the Partisans of either.\nIf this Country Submits to the Unjust demands of the Britons and throws herself into their Arms she will find their Gripe as cruel as that of France. If our Hyperfederalists Should get Us into a War with France and an Alliance with England it will be the all Society of the Wolf and the Sheep.\nFrance, before our Conquest of Canada was never able to get into America including the Continent and Islands, more than ten thousand Men. She never will be able to transport a large Army here. She will want all her Men in Europe. I am told indeed there are great Numbers of French officers and Soldiers Scattered all over the United States: that there are ten thousands of them in the City of New York and its neighbourhood on long Island. Moreau is gone to New orleans, and Napoleon is about to buy or beg the Floridas. And Apprehensions are entertained that Napoleon could Stamp his foot and raise an Army in a moment in the midst of Us. These terrors and Alarms may have Some cause and Some foundation, for what I know. That Spain has been intriguing to seduce our transalleganian Fellow Citizens is now but too evident and notorious. Your Report in the Case of John Smith, must if any Thing can put this Country on its guard in that quarter. Yet our Hyperfederalists are nettled at it and abuse it as much as they can. Do they Still mean to countenance Burr? Do they not See our danger in that point of the Compass?\nWhen poor Cicero found himself almost the only Roman left Surrounded by Clodius, Cataline C\u00e6sar and Pompey, all alike ambitious and Selfish, the two last with Legions at their heels Sufficient to overawe every independent Soul, by four and twenty per Cent, Men by in thousands to gripe the People and by Millions of the People in desperate Poverty and more desperate Vice, he had no Consolations but in his own Vanity as most men call it, but his own Conscience of Merit as I deem it. I believe you will find little other Comfort. You remember the Proclamation of Ephesus, when she banished Hormodorus. \u201cNo Man among Us Shall excell. If any Such Man Shall arise let him carry his merit to Some other Country.\u201d Nemo de nobis Unus excellat. Sed Si quis extiterit, alia in loco et apud alios Sit.\u201d You remember too, no doubt Ciceros Comment upon this memorable Vote of the Ephesians. \u201cAn hoc non ita Sit, in omni populo? Nonne omnem exuperantiam virtutis oderunt? Tusc. Quest. l. 5. n. 105.\nThe Constitution of our Country is already far advanced in decay under this corroding Cancer of Envy. Witness Jay and Elsworth and an hundred others of superiour conspicuous merit already exiled to their Lands, though not yet to Cayenne or Botany Bay. Your Exile will be to your Office and Chair and you may Soon be called again to higher Cares. If I could have been banished to the Bar, I Should have thought it an exaltation: but that was impossible. Nature was disqualified, worne out by long Use and hard Service: So that nothing remained to me but my plough, between me and Six foot by two in the Ground. I am your Affectionate Father\nJ. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1634", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Caroline Amelia Smith De Windt, 24 January 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: De Windt, Caroline Amelia Smith\nmy dear caroline\nQuincy, January 24th, 1808.\nTo-morrow will be a fortnight since you left me; I have watched the weather with much solicitude, and when we had snow, as we had the Thursday after you set out, I hoped it might speed your journey, provided there should not be too great a quantity; although the storm was severe and cold on Saturday, it was pleasant sleighing. I flattered myself we should enjoy it for a week or ten days, but so changeable the season that on Monday we had a partial thaw. If you have had similar weather I fear you have not reached your journey\u2019s end. We were rejoiced to hear from you at Worcester, and afterward at Northampton. A letter from a travelling friend is a great treat to those who sit by their firesides, compassionate their toils, sometimes fancying that they must suffer from the cold, from the snow, from the rain, hard beds, scanty clothes, small pillows, &c. But patience, my dear girl, will make a smooth road where the pick-axe has never levelled the inequalities, and soften the mattress and the pillow.\nYou will find new scenes opening before you; in the venerable oaks, you must fancy you see the image of those grandparents you have left behind, and every tree of the forest you must picture some friend or acquaintance, even to our little A., who daily calls for you. You must write me how you spend your time, what are your daily occupations and amusements, what acquaintance you make with the quail, the partridge, and the pheasant. If you find sufficient amusement in the winter, the spring will give you new employment, and new pleasures.\n\u201cYou must mark how spring the tended plants,\nHow Nature paints her colours, how the bee\nSits on the bloom extracting liquid sweets.\u201d\nI shall fancy you flitting about among the trees gathering the sweets of the season. Your friends were all much surprised at your sudden flight, and regret that they had not the opportunity of bidding you adieu. I shall send my regards to uncle Justus, and congratulate him on the acquisition of his female friends; tell him they will make the wilderness blossom like the rose, and add much comfort, I hope, to his domestic happiness. He deserves, I think, all they can bestow.\nI think of you more on Sunday than on any other day. If you cannot attend public worship, you can spend your Sabbaths in a useful manner, as Mr. W. told us to-day, every moment should be devoted to some useful purpose, that we might ask the moments as they passed, what report they bore to Heaven\u2014that the more we cultivated and improved our intellectual powers, the more capable we should be of enjoyment in a higher and more perfect state of existence; the nearer we should be allied to angels, and the spirits of just men made perfect; and that in order to cultivate our faculties to advantage, we must have order and method in all our affairs.\nI am called to close my letter, yet I have not said half I intended; take it as it is, warm from the heart of your affectionate grandmother,\nA. Adams.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1635", "content": "Title: From Louisa Catherine Johnson Adams to Abigail Smith Adams, 24 January 1808\nFrom: Adams, Louisa Catherine Johnson\nTo: Adams, Abigail Smith\nMy Dear Mother\nWashington Jan 24th. 1808\nI have delay\u2019d answering your very kind letter owing to my Baby\u2019s having been very seriously sick and requiring all my attention during a fortnight. He is now entirely recover\u2019d and has two teeth\u2014\nI much fear it will be a long time before I shall be permitted to see you as every thing appears to be in such a state of confusion and hostility that it is impossible to form any idea of the time that Congress may remain in Session. Since Mr Rose\u2019s arrival the cry for War seems to redouble, and it is generally supposed impossible to avoid it with one or other of the contending Powers\u2014but the present system so evidently inclines to France the Negociation with G.B. is not likely to terminate very amicably of this however very little has transpired and it is only from common reports that we hear any thing on the subject\u2014\nThe Presidential Election is a subject which likewise furnishes a large proportion of our present conversation parties are becoming extremely violent and there is a decided opposition between Clinton and Madison which I think is likely to produce a complete division of the present Party there are now evidently four distinct parties of which Mr M\u2019s is undoubtedly at present much the strongest. it appears to me in the present desperate situation of Public affairs it will not prove an enviable station and as the path is so thickly strew\u2019d with thorns that the few flowers with which it is decorated only serve to conceal the poison by which it is surrounded\u2014Our situation here this winter is not very pleasant as it is universally believed your Son has changed his party and the F., are extremely bitter about his talents are of too much real importance for them to venture publickly to throw him off but in private they circulate reports very much to his disadvantage he bears it with great fortitude and keeps up his health & spirits surprizingly indeed our time now so short that I myself do not feel very anxious although I almost impatiently anticipate the moment of our release\u2014\nWe are very solicitous to hear from you. Sister T. B. must I think be confined ere this, and I wish much to know how my dear Mrs Smith is, and if she, and her family, are still with you\u2014I will thank you to make my love to all and particularly to Louisa tell her that Mrs Buchanan has had a misfortune so she need not part of the work she promised though I dare say it will not be long before it is wanted Mrs B. has nearly recover\u2019d her health but is still delicate\nI hope my dear Mother as I am conscious of not shining very much in the art of letter writing that you will confine the perusal of this to yourself Kiss my lovely Boy remember me to Mrs Cranch and believe me very respectfully and affectionately\nL. C. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1637", "content": "Title: To John Adams from John Quincy Adams, 27 January 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Adams, John\nMy dear Sir.\nWashington 27. Jany: 1808.\nI have already written you a very long letter in answer to your favour of the 8th: instt:\u2014and after writing it, upon reading it over concluded the best disposition I could make of it would be to burn it\u2014Accordingly the flames have consumed it, and I must begin again.\nYour answers and observations upon my inquiries respecting the impressment of our seamen by the British are of the highest interest\u2014But this general question has been absorbed by the new decrees of the great contending belligerent powers\u2014Right and wrong are no longer subjects of discussion in our concerns with the European Nations\u2014They appear to be agreed in the determination that there shall be no more neutrality, and our only choice is, which of the two we will resist.\nI am very sensible of that situation in which you consider me to stand, and that being now wholly unsupported by any great party, the expiration of my present term of service will dismiss me from my public Station\u2014By this Event my vanity may be affected; but in every other respect it will be a relief\u2014Deeming it inconsistent with my duties ever to shrink from the service of my Country, I have always adhered to the principle that I should not solicit any of its favours\u2014The present time, and the prospects of the Nation are such that a seat in the public Councils, cannot be an object of my desire\u2014My literary profession and the Education of my children will occupy all my time in a manner which will furnish me duties enough to discharge\u2014I shall also resume the practice of the Law, as far as that will resume me, and although this is a business for which I know myself to be indifferently qualified, I shall still pursue it as far as my circumstances will admit.\nNotwithstanding the critical situation of the Country, the two Houses of Congress are acting very much at their leisure, and from their present proceedings one would imagine we were in a state of profound peace\u2014The Presidential Election engrosses the principal attention of the Members\u2014About one half the members of both houses here, have declared in favour of Mr: Madison; and to re elect the Vice-President.\u2014In the Legislature of Virginia also the friends of Mr: Madison have outnumbered those of Mr: Monroe nearly three to one\u2014I understand that by way of making a temporary provision for Mr: Monroe, he is to be chosen Governor of Virginia.\nI think you mentioned to me before I came on here, that there were two of the notes due at Hingham, which you would wish to have discharged the next Spring\u2014I will therefore if it is agreeable to you enable and request Mr. Shaw, at the end of the present quarter (which will be I think the 22d: of March) to pay you so much of the debt I owe you, as will reduce it to 4000 dollars\u2014It is now a little more than 6000.\u2014Of course he will pay you upwards of 2000 dollars of the principal, which will be sufficient to discharge two of the Notes, as far as I recollect\u2014If this arrangement should suit you, I will thank you to let me know, as early as convenient\u2014That I may give directions in season to Mr: Shaw.\nI remain, Dear Sir, ever faithfully yours.\nJ. Q. Adams\nP.S. My wife and child have been afflicted with colds, but are now well, and present their duty\u2014The boy has two teeth\u2014We received two days ago a letter from my Mother, to whom we offer our best affections\u2014", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1638", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Sarah Smith Adams, January 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Adams, Sarah Smith\nMy dear daughter\nca. January 1808\nI will not delay a single hour to replie to your Letter of Jan\u2019ry 8th just recived, and to acknowledge the receipt of that of Novbr which ought not to have lain so long unanswerd; Since Mrs Smith has been with me I have not been in the habit of writing, and when once a reluctance to the pen commences, it increases by time with time untill it becomes urksome. I know I ought to have written to you. my pen has not performd its duty. my mind has best been occupied about you and yours, and your future prospects\u2014equally tho not perhaps so anxiously as for Mrs Smith and her family now destined to the wilderness\u2014tho from her natural disposition to submit with chearfullness to whatever situation she is calld to share and participate with her family She may be inclined to considering it as blosomeing like the Rose and be disposed to accommodate her mind to her situation. her Friends cannot consider view it in in any other way other light, than a deprivation and sacrifice of social enjoyment, and a seclusion from the world. patience and good humour will mitigate every sacrifice\u2014and serve as a panacea to heal all the wounds the rubs and Scratches one receives in this rough world. It will make a smooth road where the pickaxe has never levelled the inequalities, and soften the mattress and pillow\u2014I strive to reconcile myself to it, but find it a hard task. If you have received Susans Letter you will find that your Brother came on with the first snow, and took Mrs. Smith and Caroline with him to Chenang. It was so late in the Season before the house was compleated, that I thought it best Mrs. Smith and should pass the winter with me, and go up in the spring\u2014I had prevaild upon her to write thus, but your Brother came as far as Albany, and wishd her to meet him there. I could not consent that She should go in the Stage, and he took advantage of the first snow and came on for her. When that was the case I could do no otherways than consent to her going. You may easily suppose how sensibly I feel her loss and that of Carolines who is a most amiable child William remains with us. John left us in October...William is engaged for the winter Months as an assistant to mr Whitney\u2014not to preach, but to assist him in his by taking those scholars to instruct who were learning arithmatic. this gives him some employ, and will qualify him for going into a store which he is desirious of, in the Spring, if buisness Should revive and peace continue\u2014William is an amiable modest engageing youth, and I hope will make his way in the world\u2014but through the unsuspecting credulity of his Father, he has been placed in a perilious and Situation and his Father deprived of the means of supporting himself and family nor can he hope or expect to be any way employd under the present Administration. he has pursued the wisest course left him to follow withdrawn to the wilderness\u2014there with his own hands and by the Sweat of his Brow to earn his Bread. May success crown his honest endeavours.\u2014he appeard very pleasent and happy, and assured me that he did not feel a wish to quit his situation\u2014I have had a very huge family through the Summer Seldom less than 22\u2014and you know where the care falls to to whose lot the care falls\u2014I have been blest with more health than usual, and should have enjoyd my family as much as I could consistant with the anxiety I have felt for their future subsistance\u2014\nI ask not why the world has delt thus hardly with us; we have lived in perilious times\u2014and tho we reap not the full Harvest we have earnd\u2014I presume future generation will feel the benifit of the sacrifices we have made and do justice to the memory of those who have sufferd much and endured much for their benefit. At present they seem disposed to sacrifice all the blessings of independence\nI rejoice that you have a kind sister to whom you can be mutually beneficial. I hope she has quite recoverd her Health, and will never forget the hand which healed her. the world looks very different to us when surrounded with pleasures and allured by its temptations\u2014we pass heedless on. In sickness we feel our dependence and our obligations.\nSusan is very well. She does not attend any school now. She has made a considerable proficiency in arithmatic which she pursues at home. She has also some knowledg in drawing. My greatest difficulty is to convince her of the utility of order method and diligence towards improvement. She may properly be calld an outsizd girl for she is already as tall as her cousin Louissa, and almost as large, and a woman already tho not yet 12 years of age. all these things are dissadvantages because the world expect the maturity of years and discretion from a girl not yet in her teens\u2014She is I think improveing. I have been distresst least she should be crooked for she would stoop in spight of constant admonition and out her head, which gave her a very awkard appearence\u2014but Caroline who you know is a fine figure has been of much service to her, and she has improved in her Shape for the last Six months\u2014She will never be half as handsome in her face as Abbe, but I think her form will be Majestic. I hope time will fashion her manner and disposition to my mind, but she was not born with that femenine softness and yealding disposition which some children possess. I hope it will be compensated to her in strength of mind, and sound judgment\u2014She will write to You again soon as I shall and inclose you a remittence, which I should have done now, but I wishd to assist mrs Smith as much as I could when she left me\u2014I am my &\nLouisa, Mrs T B Adams Sister Cranch and all your old acquaintance desire to be rememberd to you\nMy Love to my dear Abbe/ from her affectionate Grandmother\nA Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1639", "content": "Title: From Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to Mary Smith Cranch, January 1808\nFrom: Peabody, Elizabeth Smith Shaw\nTo: Cranch, Mary Smith\nMy Dear Sister,\nJan\u20141808 Atkinson\nAbby was indeed very happy to receive a letter from so worthy, beloved, & good an Aunt\u2014& it gives me sincere pleasure to find you were able to take your pen in hand, & convey Instruction & entertainment to your Friend\u2014The long turn of cold weather has been very unfavourable for retiring into a chamber, for any literary pursuit, even at the other end of the room the Ink would freeze The only way we had was to make a great fire, & by a well heated Parlour, make as many of the family as comfortable as we possibly could\u2014And with such a number of Boarders it has been work enough\u2014I desire to be thankful to a kind Providence that thus far through the winter, we have been favored with a good share of health. This with food, the necessaries of Life, contented, & intelligent Faces smiling upon me should, & does lighten the many Cares, with which I am involved, by the unremitted attention, Duty demands should be payed to a youthful family\u2014 It calls for Precept upon Precept, for Wisdom & Judgment to know how & when to convey the gentle remonstrance, the kind monition\u2014& to convince them that our whole aim, is their improvement, honour, reputation, & Usefulness in life\u2014\nHow happy for us that in the midst of company, business, & care, the mind unseen can be employed in the kindest wishes, for our dear absent Friends, & beloved relatives, when no leisure, or place can be found for our hands to write, or convey the warm wish, the benevolent purpose, a salutory cordial, to the equally glowing heart\u2014\nThe Situation of your health my Sister last Fall, & the advanced age of the Husband of your youth, the dear Partner of your Joys, & Griefs\u2014& my own often Infirmities, led me to fear the time could not be far distant, when flesh & heart must fail, & a separation take place, perhaps, of a much longer date\u2014And when I bid you adieu, it excited those emotions, & thoughts which an affectionate virtuous mind, ever experiences upon similar occasions\u2014 But Hope, sweet Hope, cheered & solaced me on my homeward way, & bid me \u201clook beyond the grave\u201d\u2014", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-06-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1640", "content": "Title: From John Quincy Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams, 6 February 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Adams, Thomas Boylston\nMy dear Brother.\nWashington 6. Feby: 1808.\nI am indebted to you, I believe for two letters; but there is so much in the last, of what parson Gardner in one of his Sermons said was called in the barbarous jargon of modern times quizzing, that I hardly know how to answer it at-all\u2014For the use or abuse of my name in the newspapers, whether from friend or foe, in good or in evil I hope I shall not be held accountable\u2014Neither do I suppose any of my friends, nor even the nearest of my relations can expect or wish that for every malicious or every silly paragraph which either federalists or republicans can find a motive for pointing at me, I am bound to explanation\u2014to admission\u2014or to denial. Because a certain portion of federalists have thought fit to connect the fortunes of their Cause with that of Admiral Berkley, and with that of Emperor Burr, and because in these two hopeful projects of theirs, I have thought it my duty not only to abandon them but to take a part active and decided against them, I am not at-all surprized to see the whole pack of their blood-hounds opening upon me\u2014I expected it, and am as well prepared for it as I could be for any trial of that description\u2014But I did suppose that I had friends in the world who had knowledge of my general character and confidence in the stability of my principles enough to be satisfied that my course of conduct as a public man never was and never would be regulated or governed by any base motive or any selfish consideration.\nThe Coalition of the Berkley-ites and the federalists, at the commencement of the present Session of Congress was highly exasperated against me, for what was termed my Bill\u2014They began immediately to shew their teeth, but had generally the wit to restrain their rage for that time\u2014My vote upon the embargo increased their virulence, but they still thought some measures with me were to be kept\u2014They knew perfectly well that with regard to that measure I was responsible for much more than my vote\u2014for all the influence, and all the exertions I could use\u2014But they still reserved much of their resentments in petto.\nThe Coalition of the Burrites and of the federalists, which is nearly the same with the other, but which includes some individuals of consequence who dared not pledge themselves quite so far, was driven to the last extremeties by my report on the case of John Smith\u2014Since then, they have avowedly excluded me from the ranks of federalism\u2014have endeavoured by sly insinuations in Congress, and by open denunciations in the public prints to impute every false and atrocious motive to my conduct, and among others of their ingenious devices, have bent no small portion of their anxiety to inform the world that I am professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Cambridge\u2014They have attacked my Report for its style\u2014for its principles\u2014for its argument\u2014for every thing that it did, and for every thing that it did not contain\u2014They have amused me with insulting anonymous letters, and are very assiduous in the common routine of slander and invective, by which a man\u2019s character is hunted down by these doughty champions of order and good Government.\nAll this as I have before told you is no more than I expected\u2014But this very Berkleyan-Burrite-Federal violence against me, has produced a counteraction, which I believe years of mere public service, would never have obtained\u2014It has made their opponents not only willing to number me on their side, but to give me a puff upwards for every blast downwards of their antagonists\u2014It has given me a standing of Consideration in the Senate, certainly more distinguished than I ever before possessed; and has even led some of them in newspapers and Caucuses, to talk about me for Offices to which I have neither pretension, expectation nor wish.\nYou have seen, and by the manner in which you mention the Circumstance, it seems to have given you pain if not suspicion, newspaper intelligence from supposed Caucuses here; in which it was asserted that the Monroe party talked of linking me, for the Vice-Presidency with him, as President\u2014and this in opposition to Madison, with Genl: Dearborn\u2014I have also seen these news-paper Publications, and I know nothing more of them than you do\u2014I never received the most distant intimation from any one of Mr: Monroe\u2019s friends, that could warrant a supposition that such an idea had ever been entertained by them\u2014I did attend, by invitation the Caucus or Convention of Members which recommended Madison for President & Clinton for Vice-President, and voted at it. But in other respects I took no part in the proceedings\u2014I was a mere Spectator and Hearer\u2014You may be assured that if any suggestion of connecting my name with that of Mr: Monroe upon this occasion had been made to me, I should have discountenanced it without hesitation, and in the most pointed mannerI do not think that he ought to be chosen President, and I have made no scruple of saying so at any period of the present Session\u2014\nIntimations from other quarters (not from either of the candidates) I have received\u2014It is unnecessary for me to say any thing more to you about them than this\u2014I have explicitly declared that in any support which I have given or may hereafter give to this or to any other administration, I have no personal views or expectations whatsoever\u2014Nothing to ask\u2014nothing even to wish\u2014That the only reason upon which I have supported or may support the Administration, is a conviction that they are struggling to maintain the best interests and rights of the Country\u2014Whether this answer was satisfactory or not, is unimportant\u2014You may perhaps hear less of my prospects for the Vice-Presidency, or for any thing else, than you have hitherto, but you may rely that I neither am nor ever will be pledged to any thing but to the interest of my Country.\nThe laborious part of our public business, in the Senate, is now chiefly transacted in Committees, and there have been but two Committees on any subject of national importance yet raised this Session, of which I have not been a member\u2014The time I have spent in the Committee-Room has I believe exceeded in quantity that in which the Senate has been sitting, and the time employed in my own chamber upon the subjects discuss\u2019d in Committee has perhaps been more than either\u2014I have therefore had very few moments that I could have devoted to the canvass of election had it been a sort of occupation congenial to my taste\u2014But I am observing not inattentively the attack and defence, the mines and countermines of the political combatants, and I find in them ample materials for reflections upon human nature and human Events, as well as considerable insight into the recesses of individual character\u2014In this respect I am a mere by-stander, and without taking a hand myself find amusement and instruction in overlooking the Cards.\nThe subject for the last four or five days which has engaged the deliberations of the House of Representatives has been a proposal of Mr: Sloan for removing the Seat of Government to Philadelphia\u2014 It is not yet decided, but the probability seems to be that the project will not succeed. I suspect its real and principal object is to produce an effect on the Election\u2014We had also two days ago a new Yazoo Petition\u2014from New-York\u2014presented in Senate by Dr: Mitchill, who has heretofore always voted against those claimants\u2014Warm debate on the question whether the petition should be received\u2014taken at last by yeas and nays\u2014You have seen in the newspapers how the memorial from the Massachusetts Legislature was treated in the other house\u2014Perhaps the New-York Legislature may take it up next\u2014Congress may refuse to hear those People, untill they will find inducements to listen stronger than the naked sense of Justice\u2014It is now one of the most powerful electioneering Engines that has yet been brought into play. The Extinguishment of the State Balances has also been worked for the same purpose, but that was at length dismiss\u2019d from the Senate by a bare majority\u2014\nThe Negotiation with Mr: Rose is said to have been suspended, and nearly broken off ten days ago, by his requiring as a preliminary the repeal of the President\u2019s interdicting Proclamation\u2014His legation certainly then did talk of going home immediately, and the Berkleyans in Congress were writing paragraphs for publication at home charging our Administration with the rupture of the Negotiation\u2014The rumour of departure has since subsided, but it is said Mr: Rose is negotiating with others besides Mr: Madison\u2014 I believe there is foundation for the report.\nMy wife and child are well\u2014I hope the same of yours, and ask affectionate remembrance to the whole fire-side.\nYour\u2019s.\nP.S.\u2014If you should discover in this Letter an unreasonable number of metaphors too incorrect for the Professor of Rhetoric, get Shaw to ask the favour of the Anthology-Reviewer of the pamphlet called the British Treaty to correct them.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1641", "content": "Title: From John Adams to John Quincy Adams, 12 February 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nMy good Son\nQuincy Feb. 12. 1808\nSince you will not allow me the whole of Parson Nelsons Epithets for his Son I will insist upon retaining the better half of them. Nothing was farther from my intention than to underrate the Character of Admiral Nelson. I can Subscribe to all that you Say in his praise: yet I would not exchange Sons with the Parson, though the Admiral were still living with all his Wealth, Virtues, Titles and Victories.\nThe proposed Amendment to the Constitution, to make the Judges removeable by Address of the two houses alarms me. The Question was debated in Boston yesterday in our H. of Reps. I have not heard the Result. I am grieved to see that you favour the Amendment! What can be at the bottom of this Maneuvre? Is it for the express or implied Purpose of removing Marshall Cushing and Chace? According to present Appearance if that Amendment was now in Force, those three Judges at least would be discarded before Congress would rise. The Independence of the Judges is fortified in our national Constitution beyond all former Example. So much the better. It is the only Security of our Lives, and Liberties. Our Executive is the Creature of a Party: our Legislature in both Houses is the Creature of a Party: nothing remains but the Judiciary which has any Appearance of independence of Party. The Spirit of Party is insatiable. If this Amendment is embraced it will not be long before others will be proposed, to make their Commissions during pleasure, to limit them to a few Years, or to make the Judgs eligible by Congress or by the People for Six Years, for four Years, for two Years, or for one. To this Part of the Constitution I say esto perpetua.\nEducated and living for fifty Years in a profound Veneration for the Rules of Evidence and the order of Proceedings, the ordo Judiciorum of the Common Law in our Trybunals of Justice I lamented what I thought too much Levity of Expression relative to those Subjects in your Report in the Case of John Smith. Though the discretion of the Senate may be above the Law I would never exercise it but according to Law.\nBut to return to the Judiciary. The Independence of the Judges appears to me to be our best Security against the Passions and Power of Parties. The great division of our Country into a northern and a Southern Interest, will be a perpetual Source of Parties and Struggles. Sometimes one and sometimes the other will predominate, and independent Judges will be the best protectors against the Violence and Excesses of the prevailing Party. In Addition to this formidable Cause of discord, We have all others which other Nations have experienced. We have the great divisions of the rich and the poor, Creditors and Debtors. In England the Prerogatives of the Crown, have been able to ballance these Parties and restrain the Excesses of both by independent Judges, by prohibiting Usury and by Bankrupt Laws. An American Statesman ought every Year of his Life to read the Roman History: especially Dionysius Hallicarnassensis. Livy is manifestly too much of an Aristocrat, though in general he agrees with Dionysius. The Creditors in Rome, threw Cassius down the Tarpeian Rock, killed M\u00e6lius without Judge or Jury by Cincinnatus\u2019s Master of the Horse, and precipitated Manlius down the Tarpeian Rock from the Principle of Patrician Envy and the Jealousy of Camillus. The Grachi afterwards fell in a Similar Struggle. All these Things were done by the Struggles between Debtor and Creditor. Patricians like Cincinnatus and Camillus and many others, by abstaining from Usury, by professing Poverty and a Contempt of Riches, gained the Esteem of Plebeians and Debtors and at the same time asserting in the highest Tone, the Authority of the Senate and the Claims of Creditors, became Consuls, Generals and Dictators and sacrificed all their Rivals, who presumed to compassionate the People.\nIt was a Principle established at Rome from the foundation of the City that Debtors who could not pay should be delivered to their Creditors, as Slaves. The Creditors, all Usurers, practised intollerable Cruelties on their Debtors the description of which cannot be read without horror. These Cruelties first produced the Secession of the People to the Sacred Mountain.\nFifty Years afterwards by the Law of the Twelve Tables, the Creditors had the same Rights over their Debtors. If the Debt was not paid, the Debtor was condemned to loose his head, or be Sold as a Slave. This was not all. The Creditors were permitted to cutt the Body of a Debtor to pices and divide him among them. All this was pretended to be to inspire horror for the breach of Faith, in the commerce of the World and civil Society. The Principle was good and ought to be held Sacred: but the application and abuse of it, was execrable. These Oppressions augmented continually. \u201cRepleri vinctis nobiles domos.\u201d \u201cUbicumque Patricius habitet, ibi carcerum privatum esse.\u201d Forty Years after a Law passed to give Creditors a right over the fortune only, and not the Persons of the Debtors. Livy condemns this Law \u201cVictum eo die, ob impotentum injuriam unius, ingens vinculum fidei. This Law was no Bulwark against the avarice of Creditors, for forty Years afterwards it was necessary to revive it when the People retired to Janiculum. This Subject of Debts continued to excite Troubles to the End of the Commonwealth. The Senate always favoured the Creditors instead of opposing their Extortions and Oppression, upon the Principle that the Sacred Pledge of public faith, ought never to be retrenched from human Society. Cicero, in his offices, as you well remember, maintains the same Principle \u201cIf Faith be not observed, no Commonwealth can subsist: and there is no faith where Debtors, can exempt themselves by from paying their debts.\u201d Another Cause of continual Broils was a new distribution of lands. In later times Cicero says, \u201cto discharge Debtors by Authority, or to pass the Law for the distribution of Lands, is to sap the two principal foundations of the State, of which the one is peace and the other Justice.\u201d \u201cSo many Efforts were never made as in my Consulship, for remitting Debts. Arms were taken up and Troops raised, and persons of all Ranks and Conditions, Cataline and Caesar among others entered into the Conspiracy. But they found so vigorous an Opposer in me, that the Commonwealth was entirely deliverd from that danger.\u201d There never were So many debtors, nor were ever payments made with more fidelity. When People saw themselves incapable of Using fraud they thought only of discharging themselves. In all this Cicero was right. Nevertheless Usury was at a most horrid Excess. The Patriots Pompey, Brutus &c. And the Philosopher Seneca had Money at Interest and some of them at the rate of twelve per Cent a month. In Such a State of Things how was it possible that the Debtors and Plebeians should not find a C\u00e6sar to lead them and throw of the Yoke. Notwithstanding Ciceros boast of his Efforts and Success the Evil was not eradicated, as he soon found at the expence of his head and Lands.\nOur Situation resembles that of Rome, if it is not worse. We have no permanent Senate to keep the People Steady. Our old Families and great fortunes are grasping at immense Tracts of wild Lands, to lay the foundations for great Estates for their Posterity: desperate Debtors and unthinking Plebeians wander into the Wilderness, Seize upon Lands wherever they please, without title, clear a few Acres, build log houses, sell these Improvements to new Comers and remove to commit fresh Trespasses and Intrusions. The Proprietors fill the Courts with Actions of Ejectment, Combinations are formed to resist the Laws. Our Eastern People are on the Point of Insurrection. The Pensylvania Rebellion was excited by this cause more than by the excize Law or Stamp Act, and the Frontiers are kept in a State of Effervescence from St. Croix to Missisippi. This is one Cause of a growing Envy and Hatred of the common People against the Gentlemen. our Paper Money our Banks and Corporations are made the Instruments of Accumulating Wealth, which is loaned at two per Cent a Month. Fortunes of Creditors grow up like Musrooms and impoverished Debtors break by dozens and others by hundreds live in continual fear of failing. This is another Source of Envy and hatred of the common People against the Gentry.\nWashington like Camillus and Cincinnatus, by professing disinterestedness as sincerely as either, gained an immense Popularity among the common People, and by espousing the Cause of Proprietors and Creditors acquired an equally transcendant Applause among them. Hamilton by professing a disinterest which no body believed, but by aiding and abetting the Creditors, became their Idol.\nJefferson and Madison and Burr, by seeming to favour the Debtors and by opposing the Claims of the Creditors, undermined their Influence and became the favourites of the Debtors. Burr too by the Same System obtained his Popularity: but he could Speculate and form a Manhattan Bank, the great Catapulto that beat down the Walls of federalism, and preserve his popularity with the Debtors at the same time. He got rid of his great rival Hamilton, not quite so clerverly or legally as Cincinnatus did of M\u00e6lius and Camillus of Manlius, but very effectually and has hitherto Sett the Laws at Defyance. our Parties will perpetually produce such Characters and such revolutions and as our Legislature and Executive will be always under the Influence of the prevailing Party, I say We have no Security, but in the total and absolute Independence of the Judges. I cannot but consider the Acquittal of Burr as the Effet of this independence and a proof of its importance. Our Treason Laws may be defective, but I believe Marshalls Conduct strictly and correctly legal as the Laws now Stand. I am therefore zealously against any innovation, though our Senate have agreed to the Amendment and you will probably have instructions to vote for it. I know not how you will think yourself obliged to vote, and pretend not to advise you. But I shall forever lament the prevalence of Party Spirit so far as to shake this Pillar of our Constitution.\nI write Letters too, fit only to be burnt. Inclosed is one which I determined to burn, and I desire you to do it, or send it back to me for that purpose for I am ashamed to send it where it was intended.\nMy dear Son, I can do nothing for You or my Country but pray for the Prosperity of both as I do very Sincerely. To the Wisdom and Goodness of divine Providence I resign both, imploring its direction in this very difficult time.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1642", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to John Quincy Adams, 15 February 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nMy dear Son\nQuincy Feb\u2019ry. 15 1808\nI take it for granted that you will neither in public or private Life do any thing which you are unwilling to own, or to affix your Name. I write to ask you if uninvited you attended the Caucus at Washington of which mr Bradley was President?\nIt is not the scandalous publication in Jacksons Register at Philadelphia, which has induced me to ask this question, but because I have considerd it as inconsistant both with your principles, and your judgment, to have countananced Such a meeting by Your presence. the Constitution having expresly excluded any Representative or Senator from being an Elector. I should suppose delicacy would forbid their presumeing to dictate to their constituents in a matter of Such high importance, and consider it, as an infringment upon the freedom and purity of Elections, if I May apply Such words to our Elections at the present period. in the next place I Should not have Expected, that you would have been an invited Guest, much less, that you would have appeard there an unvited Spectator.\nMy Solisitude to know the Truth, arises from some persons giving credit to the report, whom I know to be your Friends, and have staggerd my beleif. If you was present, I can only say, thinking as I do, I can never cease to regreet it.\u2014As I Shall most Sincerely, a decision in favour of the Removal of the Judges, by a petition from both Houses of Congress. If through Age or imbecility, some judges may continue upon the Bench, longer than the powers and faculties of their minds are equal to their Situations, is it not a less evil, than would result, from making them dependent upon Legislative power?\nYou must have considerd this Subject upon a larger Scale than I have; yet I have been taught to consider an independent judiciary as our Surety against arbitary power, our only best Security for Life Liberty and property. I regret that death has deprived you of so valuable a Friend as Mr Tracy, without supplying his place. to confer freely with a confidential Friend, gives Strength and confidence to opinions, of which we may be doubtfull. King Solomon Sanctiond this Sentiment when he declard that two were better than one\u2014\nThe abuse thrown out against you, and so liberally bestowed in anonymous publications in newspapers, or private Letters, some of which I have seen, particularly from Newyork\u2014where it is presumed Burr yet has Friends, and an English party powerfully prevails. I would pay no further attention to them, than to See if any truth was containd in them, which might prove usefull as admonition or reproof, never refuseing to profit even by the advise of an Enemy.\nIt is Said of Fabius in the Roman history that he patiently Sufferd the most injurious and unmerited reproach; saw his reputation torn in peices; and exposed himself to universal censure and reproach, for observing the only conduct capable of preserving the State; Saw the most important Services repaid with the most cruel ingratitude by an whole people. Yet he departed not from his plan or his duty in the midst of so many, and so sensible Subjects of discontent. This adds the Historian must be confessd to be the effect of a force and constancy and nobleness of Sentiments much above the common. this Love of the public good was the Soul of his actions and continually inspired him with that inflexible firmness and constancy for the Service of his Country, against which he never deviated into the least resentment, what ever injury he received from it\u2014\nThis is a Character worthy of imitation, which cannot fail to transmit itself to futurity, and receive from ages to come the just applause it deservedly merits, tho the Spirit of party may now obscure its Lusture, and envy through over it her darkest Shade.\nAltho You may differ from some of your nearest and best Friends in your judgment, and opinions upon important Subjects I Should much sooner Suspect the Soundness of their judgments, than the purity and uprightness of your intentions\u2014So long as you live, may you hold fast your integrity, is the sincere and / fervent prayer of / your affectionate Mother\nA Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1643", "content": "Title: From John Quincy Adams to William Smith Shaw, 18 February 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Shaw, William Smith\nDear Sir.\nWashington 18. Feby: 1808.\nI wrote you some time since and enclosed an order on the Branch Bank at Boston, to be placed to my credit; since which I have not heard from you.\nI have now only time to request you to pay to my father two hundred and ninety dollars, on my account\u2014being $250. Divd: on ten Shares in N. E. Mc Insurance Company & $40. for do: on ten Shares in Boston Bank.\u2014I expect in a few days to give you an order and the means to make him a larger payment; but must first hear for from him.\nI remain, my dear friend, ever affectionately your\u2019s\nJohn Quincy Adams.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1644", "content": "Title: From John Adams to John Quincy Adams, 19 February 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nMy dear Son\nQuincy Feb. 19. 1808\nIn Answer to your Letter of the 27 of January I request you to make Provision for Advancing me, by Mr Shaw one thousand one hundred and twenty five dollars and fifty Cents, or thereabout, which is the amount of an Obligation I owe to Miss Thaxter, or if you choose and I think there is but one remaining due to that Family.\nYour Mother has written you on the Subject of Caucus\u2019s. I am not of her opinion. Among the Romans the Patricians often held Caucus\u2019s, the Senators had Caucus\u2019s and so had the Plebeians. The Town of Boston has held Caucus\u2019s time out of mind and So have all other popular assemblies. They cannot be avoided. Bradley to be Sure made too much Pomposity of it, and therby exposed it to criticism. I blame not your Attendance nor your Vote. You ought to go on with your System. You will be instructed to vote for the alteration in the Tenure of the Judges offices, and I cannot blame you for obeying your Instructions, tho I Sincerely lament them. The dinner given in London to Mr Munroe, will not give him in my opinion the preference to Mr Madison. If this latter Gentleman is chosen he will not continue more than four Years. He will be turned out as I was. One System cannot last more than twelve years. The present System will not Shine in History. Its measures have not been wise, nor its morals pure nor its Religion divine; if it has had any. I apprehend it will not redound to your Popularity or mine to support it. But it must be supported, however unpopular it may be hereafter. We have no other Way to defend ourselves against the Sharks and Panthers.\nMr Madisons bias towards the French has always been too great but I never suspected him of Corruption. On the contrary the bias of all the Federalists to my certain Knowledge, even of my friend Mr Jay is too Strong against France and in favour of England.\nIf I were Alexander the great and had absolute Power like him I would declare War against England France and Spain all at once and Soon have the Floridas and Mexico too, and have Commerce by Sea at least by captures. That River Louisiana Missisippi I fear will cost Us much blood. I always expected it would involve Us in War. It is the very nettle that tingles in the veins of England, and that of France and Spain too. But it is ours and We must defend it.\nMay the divine blessing attend you, fortify your heart against the rude blasts you must endure, and conduct you and your Country into a Safe harbour. So prays your affectionate Father\nJohn Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1645", "content": "Title: From Thomas Boylston Adams to John Quincy Adams, 19 February 1808\nFrom: Adams, Thomas Boylston\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nDear Brother\nQuincy 19th. February 1808\nI received, Yesterday your favor of the 6th instant, for which I thank you. The letter, which upon mature consideration, I burnt, as I informed you in the cover of a letter from my Mother, sent a few days ago, was on the subject of the proposed alteration of the Constitution, as to the tenure of judicial Offices; but my ideas upon paper Suited me less than when they were revolving in my mind, and as there appeared to be no originality in them, I concluded to frank them, up the Chimney, with a blaze, instead of illuminating your thoughts, by sending them in the Mail. After the paper on which they were written had taken fire, a sudden draught of wind took the sheet at once out of sight and I never expected to hear or see more of it; them but, to my great surprize and alarm, two or three days from the time when they were committed to the regions of soot & smoak, while I was sitting quietly by the fire, down came the half burnt and lacerated dispatch, covered with a quantity of the chimney ingredients, the weight of which had caused its unexpected descent. I thought it was the Ghost of the Judiciary that had so long haunted my imagination, and by the colour and general complexion I took it to be a pretty correct representation of the features of our National Judiciary, as they will appear, whenever two thirds of the States shall have sanctioned the scheme of removing the Judges upon the address of both houses of Congress\u2014Smoak-dried\u2014discoloured and besooted as it was; here a dark stain, there a spot more luminous & legible, interspersed with a few yawning holes, where the voracious element had entirely consumed its texture, I examined it for an instant, in a state of suspence, ruminating whether, should I send it to its original destination in that doleful plight, it would not present a more perfect picture of my true reflections than in its first estate. A second thought impelled me to complete the work of destruction, and I have the satisfaction now to confirm the once premature tidings of its total consumption. I believe that a fertile fancy might have wrought these materials into an instructive Allegory, but to me it is not given to weave a web like the brain-born Goddess. I shrink from the experiment lest mine should be the fate of the fabled Arachne.\nI am aware of the difficulties under which you labour in your political career; the envy, malice and humiliated pride of furious partizans must find a vent somewhere, and you will be covered with the sparks of their effervescence. For any of our family to aid the measures of the present Administration, however congenial those measures may be with the true interests of the Nation, will be looked upon as damnable heresy, by those who call themselves federalists; and to be accused of apostacy, time serving and treachery is the least that can be expected from them. Selfish views and interested motives are ascribed without exception to every man who takes pains to distinguish himself in publick life. In our virtuous Republick, these are the wages of preferment, and yet how many are eager to receive this Salary and to prize it in proportion to the quantities of gilding with which it is surrounded. I was fully convinced before I had the assurances from you, that you had never encouraged the Association of your name with that of Mr. Munroe, for any purpose whatever, Nor did I believe, that you had attended the Caucus and voted for yourself as Vice President in your own hand-writing, as the immaculate Major Jackson would have it in his Register. I did not believe you thought so meanly of yourself as to give put in for Vice President, when there was a poll open at the same place for President. Nor, some how or other, did I believe, that you would have assisted, at all, at such a Caucus. But herein I reckoned without mine host, and upon a little self-examination I began to doubt whether I might not have attended, through curiosity, and have been called a Jacobin, as I did on another occasion, when you were appointed to Office, and baptised at the same time. Now, it seems that the old Spanish proverb, that a man is known by the company he keeps, applies to all who are seen within the walls of a Caucus Room, notwithstanding there may be some spies & some interlopers among them. I remember, one or two instances of federal Caucuses, when suspicious members gained admittance\u2014Much staring and whispering. Is he a Fed? Who knows that man? & many more such questions flew round the Room, when, at last, somebody who knew him, and could vouch for his political creed, being interrogated, instantly dispelled the gloom of jealousy, and appeased the dismay of suspicion. It is supposed that there will be a considerable division among the Republicans, in consequence of Mr. Munroe\u2019s pretentions to the Chair. It will be a laughable coincidence of circumstances, should Monroe be supported by the Tories, the Burrites and Federalists. But what can we do? We must have a candidate. Clinton has some friends, but he is too old for some many; and the general opinion appears to be that he must stay where he is, or decline a re-election. There will be twelve States, at least in favor of Madison for President, unless a change should take place before the fall. New York, if we may judge by the behaviour of their Representation in Congress, is displeased at the preference given to youth, talents and activity, in the person of Madison, to the humiliating exclusion of their favourite old General. I should give my vote for Madison sooner than any Candidate that has been mentioned or thought of: but I should prefer John Jay to any man in the Union. He is out of the question, as much as if he had been dead for a Century.\nI have read some of the attacks in the New York papers upon your report. The criticism in Coleman\u2019s Herald has been ascribed to a man, once of Senatorial rank, and upon comparing it with a review of the Declaration of Independence, which was published some years ago in the Gaz. U.S. I have concluded that the same hand produced them both. Among a few sound remarks in this last performance there is an abundance of malignant and illiberal severity. Our writers, in Boston have only talked about it queerly. Friend S\u2014\u2014 when I shall shew him your postscript will understand it, perhaps, better than I do. The Review you mention I have since read in order to take your meaning; but, saving that it appears to be from a british patriot, I can discern no clue to your allusion.\nMy wife & children are well. I presume you will learn the news of an increase of our family from some quarter or other, before this will inform you. My daughter Elizabeth will be a fortnight old, on Tuesday. With best love to your wife and all our Washington friends, I am truly yours.\nT. B. Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1646", "content": "Title: From John Quincy Adams to Abigail Smith Adams, 24 February 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Adams, Abigail Smith\nMy dear Mother.\nWashington 24. Feby: 1808\nI have just received your affectionate letter of the 15th:\u2014 and do not a moment delay to answer your question\u2014\nI did attend the meeting of members at the Capitol on the 23d: of last Month\u2014 but not without invitation\u2014 I received the same invitation, which was given to the other members\u2014 And besides that I was also personally urged to attend, by another member of the Senate\u2014 I did not attend without due reflection upon what was proper for me to do\u2014 That it should have met your disapprobation I can never cease to regret\u2014 But I cannot see the force of the objection against the Constitutionality of this proceeding.\nThe Constitution has forbidden members of Congress from being Electors\u2014but it has not forbidden them from giving their votes for Electors\u2014 They enjoy in this respect the common right of their fellow-Citizens, nor can any provision in the Constitution, excluding an individual from a privilege possessed by the community in general, be extended by argument and inference beyond the force of the excluding terms. Members of Congress cannot be Electors; but they are not forbidden as I conceive, from having their opinions, or from expressing them with regard to the person whom they think, best fitted, for the Office of President, or upon whom at a difficult and dangerous period, it is most expedient for the National welfare that the election should fall.\u2014 The question I believe has never before been raised; and in the years 1792\u20141796\u2014and 1800 the right was I believe practiced by the federal members of Congress, as well as by their opponents.\nI am sensible that there are objections of principle against all Caucusing, previous to Elections\u2014 Yet the difficulty of effecting a concert of opinions, and a combination of efforts\u2014 of harmonizing the will of great numbers of individuals actuated by the same public principles, in any other manner, has perhaps produced the necessity of resorting to measures of this kind\u2014 they are constantly resorted to by all parties, and with some inconveniences they have the advantage of rendering Elections less tumultuous, and more peaceable than they would be without such preparatory precautions.\nI do not consider a recommendation to the people, made by a number of their public Servants\u2014 made professedly in their individual capacities, as the result of a comparison of sentiments among themselves, on a subject important to all, as an attempt to dictate to the People, whom they shall choose\u2014 The People will certainly choose as Electors, whom they please\u2014 excepting that they cannot choose those who make the recommendation\u2014\nIt is undoubtedly to a certain extent the exercise of influence, but being merely advisory, I cannot think it more unconstitutional, than for the father or mother of a Member of Congress to advise him and express their wishes to him how he shall vote upon important questions, in his official situation\u2014 The influence of a Parent upon a Son, must certainly in the heart and mind of every man who feels as I do, be much greater than that of a Senator or Representative over the vote of his Constituent; yet I think myself obliged to my Parents for their advice upon any subject upon which I am to deliberate and vote; nor do I think it unconstitutional to admit any influence they think fit to exercise upon my will, as far as my own sense of duty can be made reconcileable with it.\nHaving said thus much, I must now add that the numerous newspaper Publications, which have been directed against me since the present Session of Congress, were not unexpected to me\u2014 My situation has been difficult\u2014 my conduct, governed by my best judgment, under a deep conviction of the perilous State of the Nation, and of my own duties, in the Station where I have been placed\u2014 I could wish to please my Country\u2014 I could wish to please my Parents\u2014 But my duty, I must do\u2014 It is a Law far above that of my mere wishes.\nThe proposal for an Amendment to the Constitution making the judges of the United States removable by Address of the two Houses, has been recommended by the Legislatures of five or six States, but not yet as far as I know by that of Massachusetts\u2014 I do not expect that it will pass in Congress by the Constitutional Majority, the present Session\u2014 when it comes to deliberation I shall certainly give the subject all the attention that I can bestow upon it, and shall eventually vote, as upon all other questions, according to my sincere and imperious sense of duty.\nI write you in the midst of an important debate, upon Mr. Giles\u2019s Treason-Bill\u2014 I am afraid my letter will partake of the broken attention, which this Circumstance occasions\u2014 But I could not delay even till Night an answer to your letter\u2014 My wife and child are well\u2014 I will answer my father\u2019s letter, as soon as possible.\nWith unchanging duty and affection, I remain ever your\u2019s.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1647", "content": "Title: From John Adams to John Quincy Adams, 5 March 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nMy dear Son\nQuincy March 5th. 1808\nLivy in his 42. Book and chapters 29 and thirty, as an introduction of his History of the War between the Romans and Perseus King of Macedonia, says that all the Kings and States of Europe and Asia had their Attention fixed upon those two powerfull Nations upon the Point of engaging in War. He first explains the Views of the Kings Eumenes, Prusias, Ariarathes, Antiochus, Ptolomy, Massinissa, Gentius and Cotys, and their dispositions towards the two belligerent Powers. This will amuse you when you have a moment of Leisure to read it. But when he comes to the Republicks he will interest you. He says the Multitude, who usually take the worst Side, inclined towards the Macedonians. The Principal Citizens, were divided into three Classes.\nSome attached themselves with so much Servility, devotion and Partiality, that they lost all Credit with their Fellow Citizens: few of these were influenced by the Justice of the Roman Government; the major part regarded only their own Interest, convinced they should have credit in their own Cities, only in proportion to the Services they should render the Romans.\nA Second Class was of those who were decidedly devoted to the King: some because their debts made them wish for Change; others, because their natural Vanity, and fondness for Noise and Ostentation, determined them to Side with the Multitude, who had openly declared for Perseus\u2014\nA third Class, consisting of the most prudent and judicious, if it had been absolutely necessary to take either Side, and they had been at Liberty to choose between the two, would have preferred the Romans to the King: but they desired still much rather, if that had been possible, that neither of the two Powers should much augment their Strength, by the destruction or reduction of the other, and that retaining a kind of Equality and ballance, they should be at Peace with each other; because, in that case, one of the two taking the weak States under there its protection which the other might be for oppressing, would render their Condition much more tranquil and secure. In this kind of indeterminate neutrality, they considered, as from a place of Safety, the battles and dangers of those, who had joined either with the one or the other.\u2014We shall see, after the War is terminated that they were much mistaken in believing themselves safe by this Conduct.\nCato, in a Speech to the Senate, on a Complaint against the Rhodians, after the War says, I believe indeed the Rhodians did wish, that the Romans had not conquered Perseus: but that desire is only common to them, with all other States. This is not the Effect of Enmity to the Romans, but love of their own Liberty, for which they have just reason to fear, if there be any no longer any power capable of ballancing ours, and of preventing Us from doing all that We think fit.\u2014The Conduct of the Romans soon demonstrated that this observation of Cato was as prophetical as it was honest and candid.\nLivy 45. C. 18. 21. Among the Principal Persons of each City, there were three Parties. The one was entirely devoted to the Romans, another was in Amity with the Kings; and both making their Court to their Protectors with abject Flattery, rendered themselves powerful in their Cities, which they greatly oppressed. The third Party of the Citizens opposite to the two others, observed a kind of Medium, espousing the Party neither of the Kings Romans nor of the Kings, but devoted themselves to the defence of their Laws and Liberty. These last, at bottom were much esteemed and beloved in their respective Cities, but had no Authority in them. All Offices, Embassies, Distinctions and Rewards after the defeat of Perseus, were conferred on those who had followed the Party of the Romans, and they employed their Credit to ruin those inevitably, who were not in the same Interest.\nThese Tools of a Party succeeded too well, in their Intrigue and procured the Banishment, not to Botany Bay nor to Cayenne, but to Rome and from thence to different Places in Italy from whence not more than one third of them ever returned and that not till after seventeen years of misery.\nThe same Game was played afterwards in Achaia, and Polybius was one of the Banished Quids. But he found Protectors in the Scipios, whom he has well rewarded in his History. You will find in the twenty sixth Book of Rollins Roman History Vol. 5. p. 465. to 491. a good Account of all this Villany and the perfect Resemblance to our own times and our own Country in Relation to France and England, makes it interesting at this moment to you and me, who are precisely in the Case of Polybius and all the Neutrals in \u00c6tolia and Achaia.\nJ. AdamsWe are all well", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-07-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1648", "content": "Title: From John Quincy Adams to William Smith Shaw, 7 March 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Shaw, William Smith\nDear Sir.\nWashington 7. March 1808.\nI will thank you to pay to my father, for me, on or before the 22d: of this month eleven hundred and seventy two dollars and forty-nine cents\u2014being $1081.27. for part principal of a debt due from me to him and $91.22. for a quarter\u2019s interest on the same debt\u2014As you have probably not funds sufficient in your hands to make this payment I enclose you an order to receive the money due to me at the New-England Insurance Office\u2014This however will leave a large surplus in your hands, and if my father can without inconvenience receive a thousand dollars more of the principal which I owe him, it will be most agreeable to me\u2014If he has any debt running upon interest which this additional sum would go to discharge, it might be useful both to him and to me\u2014If not, you will oblige me by depositing the balance in the Bank, to await my return home, when I can employ it to discharge some other debt\u2014In the present and probable State of the Country, to be as soon as possible free from debt, will be one of my earnest anxieties.\nThe last Letter I received from you was of 5. Jany:\u2014I have written to you two or three times since; and shall be glad to hear from you at your leisure\u2014Like myself, I suppose however that you have not much of that\u2014I hope to see you at Boston in the course of a month or six weeks, and in the mean time remain / your\u2019s affectionately\nJohn Quincy Adams.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1649", "content": "Title: From John Quincy Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams, 12 March 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Adams, Thomas Boylston\nMy dear Brother.\nWashington 12. March 1808.\nI begin by congratulating you upon the birth of your daughter Elizabeth, of which I had never heard, untill I received your letter of 19th: ulto: although we had been three or four weeks in daily expectation of receiving the news, and as this is intelligence of peculiar interest to the Ladies, there was scarcely a day pass\u2019d, but upon my return home, my wife\u2019s enquiries were, of advices from Quincy, and the increase of the family\u2014I pray that this newcomer together with her elder sister, may prove a comfort to your succeeding years, and in due time the happiness of another\u2019s youth, and the promise of succeeding generations.\nYour alarms and anxieties on the subject of the judiciary, are more earnest than the occasion requires\u2014I refer you, for my sentiments to a long letter, which I wrote a few days since to your father\u2014My faith in the theory of judicial Independence has been somewhat staggered, by the batteries of experience; but I have not yet abandoned it altogether, and I am willing to try the experiment a little longer\u2014This disposition is also felt by so many members of both Houses of Congress, that no Judges will be unseated during the present Session\u2014What the next will bring forth, is not given to me to say.\nYour reasoning upon the report, transmitted by Major Jackson\u2019s Correspondent, that I had voted for myself, at Bradley\u2019s meeting was very sound as far as it went\u2014If I had been capable of voting for myself, I should hardly have had the modesty to wait untill the second ballot\u2014The truth is that I did attend the meeting, but not without invitation\u2014that I did vote, but not for myself\u2014Who it was that put in the ballot bearing my name, I am utterly ignorant, as well as of his motive\u2014Who was Major Jackson\u2019s Correspondent I do not absolutely know, but I can shrewdly conjecture\u2014His motives I understand tolerably well; and thereby hangs a tale\u2014\nMr Bradley\u2019s printed circular to convene the meeting was dated the 19th: of January\u2014On the 20th: he address\u2019d one of them to me, and delivered it personally to me\u2014I read it\u2014asked no questions; and told him I would attend\u2014I knew not who else was invited, or whether other federalists besides myself were included in it under the denomination of Republican members\u2014Between that day, and the 23d. (when the meeting was held) I heard more than one federal member ask Mr: Bradley for an invitation, in a jocular manner indeed, but apparently with an inclination to obtain it, and with obvious disappointment, at his eluding the solicitation\u2014The disposition to favour Mr: Madison\u2019s election was not even concealed in this courtship of invitation; but I know not wherefore\u2014It did not succeed\u2014Some days after the meeting, when it was generally known, that I had been the only federalist invited, I asked Mr: Bradley why he had invited me\u2014He said it was because I had received marks of confidence from the Republicans among my own Constituents, and referr\u2019d immediately to the meeting at the State-House in Boston last Summer, and to my name appearing on the Committee appointed upon that occasion\u2014\nJackson\u2019s Correspondent I take to have been one of these Gentlemen, who had asked invitations for themselves\u2014they too had enquired of Bradley, why they should not receive an invitation, since he had sent one to me\u2014Bradley, to get rid of their importunity, said to one of them that he had not sent me an invitation; and although the person to whom this was said knew very well, what Bradley meant, yet on these words, he wrote to Jackson that I had attended, without invitation\u2014The rest of the Story, about my vote in my own hand-writing, was all of his own invention.\nIn the Gazette of the United States there appeared a contradiction of this miserable slander, in reply to which Jackson\u2019s Correspondent took the field again\u2014I know not who was the writer of the piece in Bronson\u2019s paper, and knew nothing of it untill its appearance in print\u2014You will observe the bullying style of the reply, and the readiness which the writer professes to maintain his words like a Gentleman\u2014Now the distinction upon which this Gentleman, insists upon his charge that I attended the meeting without invitation is this\u2014Bradley told him that he had not sent me an invitation; but he added, or at least the Gentleman knew, that Bradley had delivered the invitation to me himself. But he takes post at the word sent, to charge me with attending the meeting without invitation, and finding this contradicted, renews the charge, affirms that Bradley told him he had not sent me an invitation; that I attended without such invitation, and that he is ready to exchange names with Bronson\u2019s Correspondent; whom he has reason to believe to be me, or rather Bradley, at my instance\u2014Whether this itch for shooting me down in a duel, would have stood the test of a determination on my part to gratify it, is perhaps not perfectly clear\u2014The same dueling itch in a bad cause, and probably in the same person, has cost Gardenier, all but his life\u2014For Gardenier as I am well informed would not have fought, but for a stimulus from the same quarter\u2014However this may be, upon the best reflection I could give the subject, I concluded to take no notice of the publication\u2014\nYou may perhaps think it extraordinary, that on an occasion of so little significancy, and where my only real offence against this valiant federalist was, that I had received an invitation to Bradley\u2019s meeting, which he could not obtain, even by asking for it, there should have arisen a malignity so absurd, and so rancorous in his mind against me\u2014To explain this, it would be necessary for me to give you the history, of at least the last and the present Session of Congress, and also of some secret and personal history, which I am not at liberty to tell. There are federalists, who in the present state of Affairs, are anxious to negotiate themselves into favour with Mr: Madison and his friends\u2014They have been very desirous to obtain admission into the corps of his supporters\u2014Now according to their mode of reasoning, an invitation to Bradley\u2019s Meeting was the test of this Admission, and when they found me thus admitted, and themselves excluded, if you will trace the workings of certain passions, upon souls at once aspiring and groveling, you will discover the key to the letters from Major Jackson\u2019s correspondent\u2014They fancied that I too had been negotiating for the same purpose as themselves, and they were stung to the heart, at the thought that my negotiation had succeeded, while theirs had failed\u2014They found selfish motives at the bottom of their own system of public conduct, and they imputed them to me\u2014They knew themselves; but they did not know me\u2014The truth is, that while they were making advances, I was receiving them\u2014While they were soliciting pledges of personal support and local influence, I was rejecting them\u2014while they were offering themselves to Market, I was explicitly declaring, that in any support I might ever give to this or any future Administration, I had no personal views whatsoever\u2014Nothing to ask\u2014nothing to wish. This Answer I was giving, to overtures of no equivocal nature.\nI have sent you the newspaper, containing the protest, against Mr. Bradley\u2019s Convention, and against the nomination of Mr. Madison, signed by seventeen members of Congress, four of whom are from Virginia, six from Pennsylvania, six from New-York, and one from South-Carolina\u2014The stamp of the composition is that of Mr. John Randolph, and it is understood to be the signal of a coalition between the supporters of Messrs: Clinton and Monroe\u2014There are some other facts and some rumours in circulation connected with the appearance of this protest, which I shall now mention for your amusement, and which I commit to your discretion\u2014\nThe lieutenant-governor of Virginia, Mr: M\u2019Rae, one of the principal friends of Mr: Monroe is here\u2014deputed (as is said) for the purpose of forming the coalition\u2014The first proposition (as alledged; though I can hardly credit this) was that Mr. Clinton should agree to serve as Vice-President, Mr. Monroe to be substituted instead of Mr. Madison for the Presidency\u2014This however, if made, was rejected, and ultimately the order was reversed\u2014Mr. Clinton to be supported, for the great house\u2014and Mr. Monroe to come in as Vice President\u2014This point however seems to be conditionally conceded; and the protest is in the nature of a manifesto, proclaiming the principles of the association\u2014The proscription of federalists, and of any yazoo compromise, are to be the fundamental articles of the compact\u2014It is remarkable that about three weeks since, a Yazoo Petiton, came for the first time from New-York, and was presented in Senate by Dr. Mitchell\u2014The Vice-President then in conversation with me, express\u2019d himself fully in favour of a compromise of this claim, as he had often done before\u2014Whether the protest is to pledge him against it, Time will perhaps discover\u2014It is also known as a fact, that hitherto, much of Mr. Monroe\u2019s expectation in Virginia, has been of support from federal assistance; which Madison\u2019s canvassers have used as a heavy engine against Monroe\u2014The inference then seems to be, that the Monroe party in Virginia, having abandoned all hopes of success in running him for the Presidency, are now resolved to put up with the second place for him, and entirely to discard that federal assistance upon which they had previously relied.\nThe inveteracy between the Monroites and the Madisonians in Virginia, is great and daily increasing. Mr. Monroe is to publish a Book\u2014A view of the conduct of the Executive, number two\u2014This is to open the eyes of the Nation to the faults of Mr. Jefferson\u2019s administration of late years, in relation to foreign Affairs\u2014It is to shew that Mr. Monroe was compell\u2019d to sign the obnoxious Treaty of 31. Decr: 1806. because nothing better could be obtained\u2014That nothing better could be obtained because at the critical moment, when Mr: Monroe was on the point of getting every thing we could colleague was sent out to defeat him; and that the colleague was sent out to defeat him, by Mr: Madison\u2019s influence, and for the purpose of getting the start of Monroe, in the race of popularity, which was to terminate in the presidential chair\u2014\nThe Coalition, if really settled and understood, to the extent, which I have some reason to believe it is, will constitute a formidable phalanx against Mr. Madison\u2019s election\u2014One of its first effects must be to compel Madison\u2019s friends, to change their candidate for the Vice-Presidency\u2014Else they might be placed in a very perplexing dilemma\u2014For if they vote for Mr: Clinton as Vice-President, while his own friends vote for him as President, and Monroe as Vice-President, unless Madison should obtain a majority of the whole number of Electors, Mr. Clinton may become at once one of the three candidates from among whom the house of Representatives must select the President, and one of the two, from whom the Senate will have to chuse the V.P\u2014and by declining the latter, may leave Monroe to the certainty of being Vice-President, and oblige the house either to prefer him to Madison for the Presidency, or to have both the Offices at once fill\u2019d by Virginians. This is a thing so manifestly contrary to the intent of the Constitution, that I have always thought it expressly prohibited; which however it is not.\u2014The Madison men are now confident of a full majority of the Electors; but of this I have my doubts\u2014I question whether they will trust to it themselves\u2014Yet they cannot drop their nomination for Vice-President without inconsistency\u2014nor without weakening their canvas for the Presidency.\nI know not whether Shaw, will have understood my reference to the Anthology-reviewer, any better than yourself\u2014But my meaning was this\u2014That a Report of a Committee, might ask indulgence for incorrect metaphors, nearly as much as a familiar letter\u2014That such papers were written currente calamo, and that their style, was a circumstance usually suffered to pass without notice\u2014I did think it probable that Shaw\u2019s very microscopic scrutiny into the accuracy of the metaphors in my Report was in its origin Anthology Criticism; and that it proceeded from a disposition so much displeased with the substance, as to be ready to nibble more than was necessary at the form\u2014It was the same disposition, which at New-York thought to degrade the Report, by proclaiming that the Author was a Professor of Oratory\u2014The real fact is that in the composition of that Report, I paid scarcely any attention to the style at-all\u2014It was written at short intervals of leisure from a most laborious investigation of the facts, and of the principles upon which it was founded\u2014Written at different times, and printed from a rough draft, with scarcely a correction other than several erasures\u2014Yet the style was very designedly unusual\u2014My purpose was to command attention\u2014To make the Report be read; and I knew so well the character of the American reading public, that I was sure nothing would contribute so much to get readers, as here and there a flash of declamatory lightening\u2014A mere dry logical state paper would have pass\u2019d uncensured, and unread\u2014This object I believe was very effectually obtained\u2014But as to the correctness of the metaphors, I must abandon that to the critics, for I never stop\u2019d to examine one of them.\nMr. Rose is not yet gone, but is said to be upon the wing\u2014There are so many false reports in circulation respecting the progress and termination of his mission that I scarcely can tell you any that is near the truth\u2014You see the federalists, in and out of Congress storming the Executive for information\u2014papers\u2014foreign correspondence\u2014Mr: Armstrong\u2019s letters\u2014&c &c &c\u2014You and I know what it is, for American Ministers abroad to have all their official communications liable to be divulged to all the a call of papers from Congress\u2014Mr. Jefferson holds a tighter hand upon foreign papers than was possible I am glad he does\u2014If what he has communicated were published, it would aid him more than it would his anglo-federal enemies; but I believe his real apprehension is that it would exasperate the people against England more than he yet wishes to see them.\nI think Congress will adjourn in the course of next month\u2014The members are becoming very impatient to go home\u2014nothing keeps them together but the wish before they go to repeal the Embargo\u2014They might indeed give the President a discretionary power to remove it during the recess, but he does not chuse to have it. The Senate have pass\u2019d a bill for raising six thousand men; with two brigadier-generals and no commander in chief.\nAffectionately your\u2019s.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1650", "content": "Title: From Thomas Boylston Adams to John Quincy Adams, 15 March 1808\nFrom: Adams, Thomas Boylston\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nDear Brother.\nQuincy 15th: March 1808.\nI have received from Messrs: Curtis & Adams to whom I sold your Wood near the Mill pond, the amount of price agreed for; viz $160.0. for forty Cords which it turned out on measurement. I am now some what perplexed with your farm, as well as my own. My Tenant says I must consider him this year, since times & prospects are so dull and no market for produce, and I expect the greater part of your lands, which I let in parcels last year, will be turned upon my hands, this Spring. Your Tenants Cook & Wilson are desirous of remaining in the house another year, but I shall hope & try to do better. Curtis will hire the pasture another year and would take a lease of it for three or four years, but I think it would not be worth while to let it for a longer term than one year. I shall advertise all the land and the House to let at publick or private bargain in the course of a few days; it would have been done sooner, but that I was in hopes to make a bargain for the whole, having had some talk to that intent with one of our neighbours\u2014He has not yet made up his mind and is possibly expecting to do best at Auction. Landlords will be called upon to consider their tenants, pretty generally, but on whom can the Landlords call to consider them? I suppose we must cloath ourselves with the mantle of patriotism and submit with a good face to these surly looking times. If we must fight ourselves free from these Shackles, I can use a Musket or a Rifle, with tolerable skill, and whenever law as well as Commerce is under embargo, I must enter the ranks and seek my way to promotion in the tented field. I know of no other employment, which is so easily learnt as that of a Soldier, as to the mere mechanical duties of his profession; but for a soul to endure all manner of hardships, privations & sufferings\u2014that must be intuitive. Our Country is destined to another war, according to the appearance of things\u2014I see no way to avoid it, but by submission to degrading conditions; such as I hope no Administration will tolerate; and whether we must fight one or all the powers of Europe in defence of our National Sovereignty, is to me a matter of indifference. Since it has come to this, whether the Proclamation of the President interdicting British Ships of war from entering our ports & harbours, or that of King George\u2014must yield, I have no hesitation which side I ought to take. I have said very little on these subjects of late, not knowing how soon I might be called upon to act; but I have had the honor to be classed very lately on the side of the Democrats, as I have been credibly informed, notwithstanding my reserve. A great rumpuss & fuss is now abroad on the subject of a letter from a certain \u201cvenerable\u201d Gentleman or personage. The Venerable has come out in antique costume, or as the Chronicle has it, \u201cTimothy is at his old tricks again.\u201d I have read the letter once, but saw nothing in it so extraordinary as to excite the zeal & industry with which it is circulated. We have generally had a Circular from a Caucus Committee previous to Election for Governor, and this year it is written by a Senator in Congress\u2014This is all I can make of the thing. To be sure, it bears a little hard upon the Embargo, for which his Colleague voted, in spite of the unpopularity of it among the minority of his Constituents; hence, occasion is taken to say and infer, that the venerable meant a slur upon his brother Senator\u2014I shall hear something on these topicks when I go to Boston, but not much, since I am looked upon as on the point of coming or going round\u2014What is the reason that you and I can\u2019t think for ourselves without giving such mighty offence to the Nabobs? We never have been Nabobs ourselves\u2014At least, I have not, and never expect to be; the truth of the matter is\u2014\u2014I think I know what it is, but I wont write it down.\nMarch 18th: Yesterday I was in Boston and was invited to dine with Wm Sumners in company with Charles Paine; Samuel Welles & J. W. Hulbert, whose name at least you will recollect\u2014We talked no politicks, till the bottle began to circulate freely and then every one was so full of the matter that, as it is in Congress, it was very difficult to get the floor. The Embargo was the sole subject of Comment and dispute, but the young gentleman from Berkshire had to contend against the whole phalanx, who drove him up in a corner rather unexpectedly to him, as he had been the day before in a large Company at Mr. Gore\u2019s where he found them unanimously Anti-Embargo. It was conceded by some of our Company, that the measure seemed to be the result of french influence and intended to distress G. B. but in its consequences it was thought to bear harder upon France than England, which was concluded to be an oversight on the part of the french. In order to enlighten their benighted intellect, I produced & read to them your letter to J. Hall of the 9th. The feelings of all, except the worthy member, late from Sheffield, were in unison with the opinions and sentiments of the writer; even he expressed a very strong conviction of the integrity and purity of his principles, but he could not see through the necessity, of the Embargo\u2014There is, in Boston, among the federalists considerable clashing of opinion upon this subject, and some warm debates, not to say disputes have recently taken place, at the Insurance Offices, between gentlemen, who have usually thought alike on other questions. Mr: Jonathan Mason, I hear, is quite as decided in his sentiments & as zealous in his conversation in favor of your course of policy, as our friend Hall. It is the earnest wish of many, who have seen or heard your last letter that it might be printed. I should be for printing it, with your approbation, but neither A. or myself are willing to take upon ourselves the responsibility, because from the circumstance of its having been already communicated to numbers, it must be published intire and with your signature. This course is advised by some of your nearest connections, but it will not do without your permission and by the time your answer could be received, the moment would have gone by, for it to produce the effect of an antidote to the \u201cVenerable\u2019s\u201d alarm of an unnecessary and ruinous war.\nWe see in the federal prints nothing but eulogium and puffing on the subject of this letter. It is extolled as a master piece of profundity; surpassing in sagacity and penetration every thing yet seen or heard of from the pen of a federalist. Since \u201cMonsieur Paschal say so, I suppose it must be so,\u201d but for the life of me I can\u2019t see so far.\nI have seen your letter to my father in answer to one of his wherein he expresses an opinion upon the Constitutional independence of the Judges\u2014He thinks it a formidable vindication of the sentiment of favour which you expressed toward the projected modification in the judiciary department; and I am ready to confess, that I am almost persuaded to think that original sin may be made plausible & even palatable by the help of sound logick.\nFarewell.\nPS. Sunday 20th. You have doubtless heard of my good fortune in the birth of another Daughter. This day week we took her to Meeting and exhibited her to the Congregation while the parson baptised her by the name of Elizabeth Coombs. She is a likely child & folks say very much favors her father.\nMy Wife and the family send love to you and yours.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1651", "content": "Title: From Hannah Phillips Cushing to Abigail Smith Adams, 17 March 1808\nFrom: Cushing, Hannah Phillips\nTo: Adams, Abigail Smith\nMy Dear Madam\nWashington March the 17th. 1808.\nWe were blessed with fine weather & roads from Providence to Phila., where we staid a fortnight; & from thence here as good as usual in Jany. My Husbands health daily increasing, & my own entirely restored from the anxious & destressing winter, & summer, I had just passed through, also having heard as late as the 26th. Novr of the welfare of our dear Relatives at New Orleans, my spirits were revived, & I was pleasing myself with the hope of having an agreeable winter, when lo we had been in this our pleasant Chamber but five days when the sudden death of my beloved & only Brother, came as a faithful monitor, to warn us of the frailty of all human enjoyments. But blessed be Heaven since the first day & night my mind has been wonderfully composed & resigned, being fully persuaded that his days were then numbered & finished, that, that was the way ordered by the great Ruler of the Universe for him to depart out of this World, into I hope & trust a Heavenly region. I have mentioned him but seldom to you my bosom Friend, but he was very near my heart, & if I could have ransomed him from death a few years longer, by living on bread & water the remainder of my days, I would have most cheerfully have done it. His heart was truly benevolent, for the milk of human kindness flowed around it. He took no delight in speaking ill of any one, & the tongue of slander he put far from him. He has left a bright example of patience, & fortitude, under great trials, & reverse of fortune. Often have I viewed him with astonishment & delight rising superior to them all, & labouring hard for his daily bread; at the same time my heart has been sorely grieved for him, & if I had been possessed of a fortune, with how much satisfaction would it have been bestowed. While I lament & bewail the departure of one so deservedly dear to all his connexions, I reverence the hand which inflicted the blow, & bow with submission to the will of the most High; Believing that there is a time to come when we shall be reunited where no revolutions of nature shall ever separate us more. The excellent sentiments contained in your good letter, which I received in May last at Phila., often occur to solace me in this great affliction, & I have not yet expressed to you how much satisfaction the receipt of it gave me. I have a propensity often, when most obliged to say the least. I have received a letter from my dear afflicted Sister Phillips. She is under very great affliction, but strives to be submissive. Religion seems to be her all & only consolation, & it is in that all Balm of comfort, that I must resort to for the healing of this & every other sorrow, that Heaven sees fit to inflict upon me. I will endeavour all in my power to fulfil what would have been his last worldly wish could he have expressed it, Do what you can my Sister for my Wife, & two darling Children. The eldest is not eight years old. Court finished yesterday. My Husband sat six weeks daily, two days excepted. They went in at 11 O C & sat till 4, generally, which was trying to a feeble constitution; & last sabbath after we came from the Capitol He was taken with chills. I sent immediately for Dr May who recommended a dose of six Lockyer Pills, which had a good effect. We had intended a visit to Mount Vernon to see Mrs Judge Washington. She too has had great affliction since we parted in N York last June, having lost her Father, & a Son of her Brothers, whom the Judge & her self had adopted for their own, also a Son of her Sisters, & a Miss Washington, Niece of the Judges. The last three were buried in less than three weeks by the side of each other. Notwithstanding I am so strongly drawn by the cords of nature, & love, to hasten my return to my dear & sorrowing Sisters, to sympathise with, & console each other, for the death of our dear departed Brother; yet it is with heart felt regret that I relinquish the idea of first seeing Mrs Washington, & also some dear Friends in Alexandria. But Dr May advises us to set our faces to the North without delay, & my own fears coincided, least we should have the same scene to go through as that of last winter. The Dr request me to give his best respects to you & the President. Judge & Mrs Cranch have just called to see us; they are both in good health. It is some days since I saw Mrs Adams, but presume that She, & Mr Adams, are well.\nBaltimore the 20th. Sunday. We came to Rosses 9 miles the 18th. & yesterday reached here. The roads never were better, having had remarkable fine weather for some time. Vegetation is coming on rapidly. It is three weeks since the buds of the Lombardy Poplars began to swell. I have seen or heard but very little of what has been going on in the City this winter. Having neither dined or taken Tea out of my room once. Contrary accounts have frequently circulated respecting Mr Rose, & it was confidently asserted ten days since that the Negotiation was at an end, But I called to see Mrs Madison yesterday week, who told me it was not so; That Mr Madison had finished his part of the Buisiness, & that it remained for Mr Rose to close it. That when it was committed to paper which was nearly done, it would be immediately laid before the Public. She observed that to be sure She was not let into the secret, yet as the Negotiation was going on in her drawing room, (Mr Ms. ill health not permitting him to leave it) She could not help hearing more than she wished. I told her that is was said Mr Rose only had power to settle the Chesapeak affair. She said that was not true. My Husband whose veneration & respect, with mine will be as lasting as life for you, & The President, wishes to be respectfully remembered to you both, also to Judge & Mrs Cranch. I often think of Mrs Adams, & Miss Smith, & wish to be mentioned to them with esteem. I have delayed writing to you my bosom Friend, much longer than I intended; my dear Connexions being separated, & residing in so many different places, & all of them anxious to hear often from us, engrosses most all my time that I have for writing. We hope to be in Middleton by 10th. of April; a letter from you my Dear Madam will be gratefully received by your Friend\n H Cushing", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1652", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Abigail Amelia Adams Smith, 18 March 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, Abigail Amelia Adams\nmy dear daughter\nQuincy March 18th 1808\nWilliam has been so punctual in writing to you every week, that I have been more remiss. I cannot write in an Evening; the only time in which I feel a disposition to use my pen is the forenoon. You know how buisily that is generally occupied, and more so now Louisa is in Boston, and the Farm buisness is just commencing. mrs dexter is going to housekeeping. I know not where to supply her place, but her family increases mine, and the Embargo distresses us all. yet is it a measure that I am convinced was the mostbest calculated to avert the horrors of war, of any which prest on all Sides, as our Government were, could have been resorted to, cruelly oppressive as it appears, and hard as it is to be borne. we had better suffer temporary privations, than the calamities of War, which when once commenced, no one can calculate or estimate. You have expresst your surprize that your Brother attended the Caucus at Washington. William has coppied a Letter and inclosed to you in replie to one which I wrote under the same impression which you felt at the report; as he says he weighd well the Subject before he went, I presume he considerd mr. Madison the fittest man upon that side of the Question, and one of the most sensible and candid of virginians, a moral man unexceptionable in private Life. In the present State of our Country, Union is essentially necessary to our very existance, and so small is the federal weight in the political scale that there is not the least probability of their succeeding in any federal Character they might nominate. to obtain the Best and least exceptionable on the other Side is a desirable object. These were the reasons I have not a doubt which induced your Brother to attend the caucus which has subjected him to so much falshood and calumny from the federal party: for they could always perform their part, not quite so hardily however as the Antis.\nIn a Letter of late date, March 9th he says, I have no partialities in favour either of Britain or France. I do not believe that either of them is fighting the battles of the world, or sacrificing itself for the Liberties of Man Kind\u2014during the present war the first aggression against Neutral Rights was :committed by Great Britain She it was, who by her pretended rule of the War of 1756 undertook to interdict the trade of neutrals with her Enemies colonies\u2014\u2014for the purpose of monopolizing it herself. Scarcly two Years have elapsed since Congress was besieged with petitions and memorials from all the Merchants of the United States against this usurpation upon the most unquestionable Neutral rights, a Resolution of the Senate unanimously declared it, an unprovoked aggression upon the property of our Citizens, a voilation of their Neutrals rights an encroachment upon our national Independence\u201d. It was in consequence of a memorial from Boston on this subject that a special mission was sent, to England\u2014That special mission you know has failed. It terminated in a treaty so derogatory to our Rights that the President did not even lay it before the Senate. A Treaty which would in substance \u201chave surrenderd to Great Britain the whole of her principle against which we had so formerly, and so justly protested.\u201d\nwith respect to foreign influence he observes thus\u2014the speculative opinions and personal feelings of the President & Secretary of State, have perhaps always inclined too much towards France; as the opinions and feelings of other Statesmen equally distinguished have inclined too much towards England\u2014there are few, very few indeed, in this great political conversion of the world whose Hearts have not taken a Side in the Struggle; but it has been, and still is my candid opinion, that so far as relates to public conduct, and official acts, the neutrality of the present administration has been as fair and impartial as it was under either of those which preceeded, and during the former war\u2014The administration is and must be charged with the duty of asserting, and maintaining the Rights of the Nation, but this duty it can never discharge, unless the Nation itself give it countenance and Support in its measures.\u2014\n\u201cSpeaking of the embargo, he writes, I consider it as the last anchor of our peace, and if it can preserve us that Blessing, heavily as it bears upon our country, I shall always rejoice at my vote in its favour, as contributing to the extent of my power to the best interest of the Nation. There is no Smart like that which is felt, that we may have no opportunity to compare by this scale of actual feeling the sufferings, of war with those of Embargo, I do most fervently wish, but if we should, I have no doubt of the result. The little finger of war will be heavier than the loins of embargo.\u201d\nI wish I could transcribe the whole of the Letter, but do not feel at Liberty to, as it is written tomr Hall, and only lent to me; it Breaths through the whole a Spirit of candour and impartiality, and integrity which is the true Character of the Man and which is a Source of never failing Satisfaction to me.\nwith respect to mr Roses Negotiation, I do not believe from the statement given, that it can terminate to the Satisfaction of the Government. He says, I told Mr. Roses principle companion, (who was an old acquaintance of mine at Berlin) that if he & I had the negotiation to conduct, and I had unlimited powers\u2014I would ask of him one single word, and give him Carte Blanche\u2014The word was Reciprocity. but Great Britain has no Idea of that.\nI know how much you feel interested in whatever affects the Characters of those nearly connected with you\u2014and I could not so ably defend your Brothers against the base attacks made upon It, by attributing to him views which never enterd his mind, and conduct which he scorns, as by transcribing his Letter, and giving you fully his Sentiments\u2014you can form an opinion by what is before you\u2014\nWilliam this day has finishd his School much to the Satisfaction of his employers\u2014his attention has been unremitting and his Success will Speak his praises. He appears averse to the Law, the Embargo is an obstical to all commercial enterprize, the Army Seems to be his object, and his Grandfather has told him that he should not have any objection to writing both to the President and mr Madison and the Secretary of War. I have also told him that I would write to the President. Several young Gentlemen have gone from Boston to Washington for the purpose of engageing in the Service. upon this Head, he will consult both his Father and you\u2014I feel loth he should leave us, but know not what to advise him to do\u2014\nTell Caroline I will attend to her commission to her Brother, and that I shall write soon to her. Mrs Adams has had a fine getting up, scarcly sick a day. her little Girl grows finely and is quiet. They both went to meeting last Sunday, Elizabeth Coombs is its Name,\u2014Abbe grows daily more and more interesting\u2014dresses herself up and shakes her hand with a good by Mamma, by Grandmamma, go and see Aunt Miff and Caroline which She has now learnt to pronounce\u2014She is very fond of the Baby, call it precious Sister\u2014and teazes it so with her caresses that her Mamma cannot keep her with her\u2014 My paper is almost full, Yet I have many more things to say. Your Father had a Letter from John this week who was well. Susan has written to Caroline. What kind of a Letter I know not as she would not let me See it\u2014 I inclose it however. Pheby is so much better that She hobbles about House\u2014With Love to all I am your truly affectionate\nMother\u2014", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1653", "content": "Title: From John Adams to John Quincy Adams, 18 March 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nDear Son\nQuincy March 18. 1808\nYour luminous Letter of the 27th of Feb. and 6. March are is before me. Was this an homogenious Nation under a consolidated Government, the Provision in the Constitution of Massachusetts would be Sufficient. But in a Confederation like ours there is danger. In Holland they have thought unanimity necessary in all most every Thing. Under our old Confederation, a Concurrence of nine States out of the thirteen in the Appointment of Ambassadors and many other things was thought necessary. The Struggles between the Northern and the Southern States have always been so vehement, that more than a Majority have been thought indispensible to Safety and to Justice. As you are now instructed by our Legislature, I Suppose you will think it your Duty, as I do, to vote for an Amendment: but I am rejoiced to learn that the Inclination of the Senate is to postpone this very interesting Subject as long as possible and that they are generally averse to Innovations and Alterations of the Constitution. The Judges in England are adjugded to hold Estates for Life in their Offices, defeasible on Misbehaviour and on an Address of the two Houses of Parliament. I hope the Idea of Estates for Life, in their offices will be preserved. For the Sake of Equity and Humanity, I pray that We may not have Judges Elective or for a term of Years. Nothing will be Safe. Perhaps I may differ from many in my deffinition of the Word Misdemeanor.\u2014Non feasance is as really a Misdemeanor in Office as Malfeasance. Neglect of Duty from Ideotism, Intemperance Imbecility or Incapacity, or from willfull Idleness, may may be liable to Impeachment, as well as Corruption and the more heinous Crimes. In Such Cases, therefore, if I am right the present Constitution is Sufficient. Surely it cannot be Said, that a Man who is grossly and Scandalously negligent of his duty, or incapable of performing it, behaves well in his office. Is a Man in no case, ever indictable for gross Negligence, Non feasance, or Non Performance of his Duty in a public office?\nIf any Alteration should be introduced, and the Judges made removable upon an Address of the two houses I Should wish the present Majority in both should be preserved, or at least as much of it as possible. It is not however my intention or my Wish that this or any other Opinions or Intimations of mine should influence or have any Weight in the decision of your Judgment, any further than to induce you to consider the Subject.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1654", "content": "Title: From Thomas Boylston Adams to John Quincy Adams, 24 March 1808\nFrom: Adams, Thomas Boylston\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nDear Brother\nQuincy 24th: March 1808.\nAlthough I have recently written you a letter of some length, I will not therefore refrain from a prompt acknowledgment of your favour of March 12th: which particularly deserves my thanks for the variety of intelligence it contains, of a nature not to be derived from any other source. The detail you have given of the various intrigues supposed to be in operation at head quarters and elsewhere for the accomplishment of particular objects, is amusing to those who consider themselves only as lookers-on, and purposely avoiding to take any part in the plot. You know how strong the prejudice of the federal party in New-England generally, and in this State in particular, always has been against a Virginia President, since the time of Washington, and though the Democrats have yielded the precedence to the antient dominion and supported the Administration of Mr: Jefferson, with great zeal, it may be questioned whether there will be equal unanimity among them in the choice of a Successor. I rather incline to think that Mr: Clinton would obtain more votes for President than Mr: Madison, at present, through the N. England States, but how it may be six months hence is another question. It is to be presumed that a pledge will be required of the Electors to support some one of the Candidates and to this end care will be taken to select fit men for Electors. Much of the success of any Candidate will depend upon the state of the Country at the moment of chusing Electors\u2014If we have war, it is understood that the present incumbent will be forced to continue; and if we have peace, it is my humble opinion that the party will, for fear of accidents, persuade him to stand another poll. I do believe that the sentiments expressed by the Protestors against Bradley & Co and their nomination, will create such divisions among the Democrats, that the Federalists may yet prove a more formidable phalanx than the protestors themselves are willing to admit. The votes of Connecticutt and Delaware may yet turn the scale against the favourite Candidate, and there is no doubt of their being thrown into that which would disappoint the greatest number of the Democratick party.\nWe are to be drummed up, once more, in this State, to show our teeth against Govr. Sullivan. I have been nine years constantly voting and making myself busy in the cause of Federal against Democratick Governors. What shall I do this year? This is more than I can tell. I cannot vote for Mr: Sullivan, for several reasons, and though I am personally friendly to Mr: Gore whose character is altogether unexceptionable, so far as I know, I am well persuaded he cannot be elected. The Circular letter alone would be sufficient to defeat the prospect of his success, though it is expected to produce most wonderful effects in the Sea ports\u2014In Boston it will not do to express a doubt as to the success of the Federal ticket\u2014I am not disposed to defeat it and if silence on the subject will do any good, I am content to hold my peace. But in opposition to this it seems to be the opinion of some of your best friends, that you ought not to keep your peace. The Letter from the \u201cVenerable,\u201d has stirred up some-old-blood, which at times circulates with considerable rapidity\u2014I need not particularize....The conclusion seems to be, that you must act your own sound discretion, as to the expediency, of communicating, any information you may possess, relative to our foreign relations, directly to your Constituents. There is a disposition in many to think and act right, but they want information; not as the clamourers for correspondence in Congress want it, for the sake of mischief, but honestly, for conscience-sake. This class however is not very numerous, for between those whom no information would satisfy, and those who want none to be satisfied with the conduct of the Administration, the men of influence are generally divided. On your return home you must expect to find yourself in a strange land. The sour looks & spiteful leers will not be few, that you will have to encounter, but they will be seen on the faces of those who have long harboured a secret heart-malignity against yourself as well as against your father. By relying on the efficacy of the \u201cVenerable\u2019s\u201d prescription, at this particular crisis of our National malady, the Junto will most inevitably fail in their expectations of a cure. The address from the federalists of Boston in this days paper is but an Echo of the Senatorial Manifesto\u2014It condemns the Embargo as a \u201cdesperate remedy,\u201d and declares that no other probable ground or motive, than to gratify the wishes of the Emperor of the french, is competent to account for that measure. As no electioneering purpose would be promoted by an address from you before your return, I have thought fit to suggest such a step for your consideration, rather as a borrowed than an original idea of my own\u2014though I have some recollection of having urged it upon you a year or two ago. By Governor Sullivan\u2019s curious replications to your Colleague, you will observe, that his Excellency tells the Venerable, that his view of National affairs and yours are widely different, as \u201cthe world knows.\u201d Now the world has not seen your view of National affairs, but only a few individuals, unless the Summary of the substance of your letter to H\u2014\u2014 which got into the Chronicle should pass for such. This would be an injustice to yourself, as the Chronicleers have only selected what they thought useful to their purpose. Indeed, neither the federal nor the Democratick presses would be pleased to imprint all your sentiments but I would undertake to make the same types subservient to a letter of your writing, as were employed in the first Epistle of Timothy. This will be fighting the Junto with their own weapons.\nI thank you very kindly for your congratulations upon the birth of my daughter. It had escaped my memory, having informed you of the fact; so you will find the intelligence repeated in my last letter. We are all well, and I presume you will see us on your return, still members of the same family & under the same roof, which I very much regret as it is induced by necessity rather than choice. If I remove at all, it will be to my own farm, but to this there are so many obstacles, in addition to my own aversion to the place, that I must submit to be a pensioner for a time to come. Our nephew William, having completed the term of his School engagement, has left us to join his parents. His views are for the Army, in which he would accept a Commission if it can be obtained. The Miranda discipline has not, I trust, disqualified him for the service of his Country, though it may possibly prove some impediment to his obtaining a desirable rank. If the men are to be raised, which you mention as having been voted in Senate, I wish you would feel the pulse of the Secretary of war, on the subject of a Commission for the young Col; If he were personally known to me I should have no hesitation in making application for a youth of so much real merit, as I know he possesses.\nPresent me very kindly to your wife and all our friends at Washington. We shall not look for you till the last of April, by which time the Roads will be fit for travelling with pleasure & dispatch. Our friend Shaw is dolefully mortified that I betrayed to you his sapient criticism upon the metaphors\u2014I took some little delight in his fidgeting because he is too easily wrought upon by the last speaker, upon most subjects. His Associates, literary and political are full of Boston notions; a very partial, prejudiced, self sufficient & locally attached set of people, with pretentions to a character & reputation the very reverse of all this. I never held and never shall hold much communion with them.\nI am truly your\u2019s.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1655", "content": "Title: From Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to Louisa Catherine Johnson Adams, 24 March 1808\nFrom: Peabody, Elizabeth Smith Shaw\nTo: Adams, Louisa Catherine Johnson\nMy Dear Niece,\nAtkinson March 24th. 1808\nYour Letter did not reach me untill several Weeks after it was written, & as I had a few days before addressed a letter to Mr Adams, I presumed upon the reception of that, your minds would be rendered less anxious, but notwithstanding this, I should immediately have replied to your polite friendly letter, & to your questions, respecting Master George, if we had not been so unhappy as to have a number in our family taken sick one after another, with fevers, & my duty called me to unremitted attentions to the beds of Sickness, & to do all in my power to soften the pillow of distress\u2014You need not my Dear Niece have made the last appology for writing to One, under whose care a \u201cDarling Child\u201d had been placed. He is in fine health & spirits, & is indeed a lovely Boy\u2014His mind is strong, & penetrating, with great facility he commits things to memory, & applys them with uncommon judgment\u2014The other day he was playing with one of his mates who endeavoured to deceive, & cheat him\u2014He soon perceived his design, & said, \u201cWilliam I have somewhere read in a Book, that he who endeavoured to cheat Others, cheated Himself.\u201d\u2014His Father observed he had some propensities which ought to be checked. Where the soil is fertile, we may expect to see the \u201cweeds & flowers promiscuous shoot,\u201d & it requires a most skillful, judicious hand, to know what to erase, and what we should permit to flourish; for flowers have sometimes poisonous qualities, as well as Weeds, & Virtues, if not rightly directed, may degenerate, & grow into Vice.\nMaster George reads, parses, & spells well, but he learns to write very slow\u2014He wished to write to his Father, I gave him paper, he soon came to me, & read a very affectionate letter, with his duty to you, & love to his little Brother Charles\u2014hoped he should soon see you all in Boston\u2014I looked at it, but could not read a word, he wondered what could be the reason, for he met with no difficulty himself\u2014\nCongress has had a long Session. The conduct of some of the Members, have not escaped many unfavourable remarks. But the Integrity of Mr Adams, was in my Mind, unquestionable. I firmly believed, that he was not actuated by sinister motives, nor party Spirit, but would think, judge, & act, from a sense of the highest Duty\u2014\nMy Dear Nephew & Niece may be assured, that both Mr Peabody, & your Aunt, will tenderly watch over your child, & do all in our power to make him good, that he may be a Blessing\u2014With esteem & affection / Your Aunt, subscribes\nElizabeth Peabody\u2014", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1656", "content": "Title: From John Quincy Adams to William Smith Shaw, 25 March 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Shaw, William Smith\nMy Dear Sir.\nWashington 25. March 1808.\nYour favour of the 5th: instt: never came to my hands untill yesterday\u2014I have long noticed the characters of the factions which were excited among all the antient nations, in their relations with the Romans\u2014It has been particularly remarked by Montesquieu, and its application to our own Affairs is no new thing in my mind\u2014Modern History is full of the same phenomenon\u2014The English and French factions in Holland, were among the earliest occasions for my observations on living man\u2014The hats and the caps of Sweden mark the same features in human character\u2014But there as well as in Holland the Spirit of faction was envenomed by the distribution of money, by both parties, among the principal leaders\u2014I hope nothing of this sort has occurr\u2019d or will occur with us.\nWe are at the fourth day of reading dispatches; with a Message from the President containing all the documents of Negotiation with France and with England for several years\u2014Mr: Rose is gone\u2014But Mr: Erskine remains here, and Mr: Pinkney has lately been re-appointed to England.\nWe are all well here\u2014I am as ever, your\u2019s\nJohn Quincy Adams.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1657", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Abigail Amelia Adams Smith, 27 March 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, Abigail Amelia Adams\nmy Dear Daughter\nSunday Eve. Quincy March 27th 1808\nWilliam left us on thursday, and on fryday set his face towards you. we parted with him, with much reluctance his whole conduct has been so Satisfactory to all of us, that our Blessings and good wishes will follow him, where ever he goes, or what ever his destination in Life may be. to the reading Law he appeard averse; and he offerd weighty reasons against it. the bent of his mind appears to be for a military Life. the present State of our country bodes employment in that department more than I wish it did, what arrangements will be made, a little time will disclose. his Grandfather will write to the proper Authority in his favour, if he should decide for the Army. if any thing should present in a civil line of Life; it would certainly meet my wishes in preference\u2014Several Letters arrived on saturday for him\u2014which agreable to his request, his uncle has coverd and returnd to him one of them, from its back, I fancied might have an inclosure for me but I did not feel myself at Liberty to open it. if so I shall regret that it was returnd.\nI sent by William a few articles which I presumed would be acceptable to you, and to Caroline, my commission should have extended further, if william could have delayd his return longer, or into April\u2014I might sometimes forward you a few necessaries if any mode of conveyence could be pointed out.\nThe Season here is mild, and we have the appearence of an early Spring\u2014we have begun to prepare our Garden. there is a general Stagnation of buisness. the farmer knows not how to hire labour or to pay for it rather. commerce is dead and agriculture is chief mourner. not a ray of light brakes through the Gloom. information is arriveing that Napolean is hunting out new inventions to draw tighter the restriction with which he has bound commerce and oblige us if possible, to take a part for or against him. an other unhappy affair has taken place in the East Indias between the British and Americans upon the old griveance of impressing Men, and Blood has been Shed upon both Sides: the Anti Anglonianes Seize with eagerness every cause of uneasiness, and work it up to a pitch of voilence which must terminate in war. the British are very insolent and haughty\u2014and exercise their power, without much regard to right.\nall events are under the Controul of a Supreem being who will order and direct them, I hope trust for our best good: and may it please him to avert from us the horrors of war\u2014\nI have not much of a local nature to relate to you. William will tell you all a bout us, of uncle and Aunts, little folks and great\u2014his uncle Cranch he did not know was Sick. he is seizd with one of his old Lung complaints, which his advanced Age makes very allarming\u2014he has had a Strengh of Constitution which has carried him through much sickness, to a very good old Age in vigor and usefullness. So good a Man is ready to depart when calld for, Yet we wish to keep him here longer. Col Hubert of Abington died a few days since very suddenly. Who that knew what a frail feeble being his wife has always been, would have Supposed that she would have Survived him?\nYou must write to me frequently. I shall want to know how you come on, when you begin to vegitate, what Success you have had with maple Sugar? &c what help you have, what sort of people you have as neighbours? whether you can use a wheel carriage\u2014you have a Physician near you.\nI saw Miss Hinkly in Boston\u2014She regreted very much that she did not know that you was in Northhampton William has taken Letters to her. and his Grandfather gave him one to Govenour Strong\u2014I suppose he will be with you by the time my Letter reaches you.\nMy Regards to Mrs St Hillair, and Love to the col. Louisa is in Boston. Mrs Adams will write to you.\nall the domesticks join in Love to the dear Caroline\u2014Mary always has her dear Souls over, when ever she talks of her\u2014So Caroline may skip light as the faun\u2014since she is always rememberd as the dear delightfull Girl whom every Body loves. and no one more than her affectionate Grandmother\nAbigail Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-30-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1658", "content": "Title: From John Quincy Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams, 30 March 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Adams, Thomas Boylston\nMy dear Brother.\nWashington 30. March 1808\nI thank you for your kind attention to my affairs, as detailed in your last Letter which I have received within these two days\u2014 I confide entirely in your judgment and discretion, and shall approve of any arrangements you shall make for the present disposal of my farm\u2014\nR. Dexter holds or held a note from me of a little more than three hundred dollars\u2014I left a request with Shaw to pay it as soon as he should be in funds\u2014If he has not paid it, I will thank you to discharge it, with the interest due upon it immediately\u2014If you have not money enough in your hands, Mr: Shaw will furnish you with as much as you may want for this purpose; and will charge it to me in account.\nWe received last week a budget of papers from the President containing all the negotiations both with France and England, for two or three years past\u2014It has taken us six days to read them; but some of our Gentlemen are not yet satisfied\u2014They think there is yet more behind\u2014They will have it that we are acting under french compulsion\u2014\nThe french compulsion, has been of exactly the same kind as the English compulsion It has been by public decrees, and not by secret negotiations\u2014But the compulsion began with the English\u2014The French only followed their example, and improved upon it\u2014Between them both it is very clear that there is nothing like neutral Commerce left\u2014I expect to prove this to your satisfaction before long.\nWe have this day received additional messages, enclosing further dispatches from France and England, received since the Communications of last week\u2014but they have not yet been read.\nAmong the papers sent last week, is a long vindication of himself, for signing the unratified Treaty, written by Mr: Monroe since his return to this Country\u2014The transactions respecting this Treaty form a great foundation for electioneering.\nI have sent you the pamphlet containing the negotiation respecting the attack upon the Chesapeake\u2014You will see the ground taken by the British to evade making any reparation whatsoever for that outrage\u2014\nMy wife and child are well\u2014We hope that our children in your neighbourhood are also well, as you do not say any thing to the contrary\u2014We should have been glad had you thought of them to say so positively\u2014We have heard nothing express of them, longer than parental anxiety brooks without uneasiness.\nRemember me affectionately to all the family, and believe me ever yours\nJ. Q. Adams.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-31-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1659", "content": "Title: From John Quincy Adams to William Smith Shaw, 31 March 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Shaw, William Smith\nDear Sir.\nWashington 31. March 1808.\nI will thank you to give the enclosed manuscript to Oliver and Munro, to be published immediately\u2014If they do not chuse to print it you may get any other printer to do it whom you please\u2014It is not meant for electioneering, but for self-defence; and to give the public my views of public affairs\u2014The printers will give perhaps a few copies, for the manuscript\u2014I want only half a dozen\u2014One of which I will thank you to present in my name to Mr: H. G. Otis\u2014one to Governor Sullivan, and one to my father\u2014The three others I will thank you to send to me, as soon as possible, that they may reach this place before the adjournment of Congress\u2014When I say that you may give it to the printers, I ought to add that there must be no copy-right\u2014And above all no puffing preface.\nEver faithfully yours\nJohn Quincy Adams.P.S\u2014I must request you to be particularly attentive to the correctness of the printing\u2014And to get the printers to preserve the manuscript.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1661", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Louisa Catherine Johnson Adams, 4 April 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Adams, Louisa Catherine Johnson\nmy dear daughter\nQuincy April 4th. 1808\nIt is a long time since I wrote you, or rather since I sent a Letter, for an unfinished one has lain by so long that like an old Almanack it is out of date. The writing Spirit is not always present, and it is shy and coy. If you do not frequently solisit it, neglect is sure to be followed by indifference, and indifference by disgust; I need not any other prompter at present than the desire I have to write of your children from whom you have not heard for some time. By a Letter from Atkinson I hear that George is very well, and a very Good Boy. Abbe Shaw has been very sick, even to an allarming degree, seizd with a puking which could not be checked for several days untill She was reduced almost to the grave. I have my fears that it will terminate in a decline which will be to my poor Sister a heart rending stroke, which and will break it I fear. She has never recoverd the loss of Betsy, altho like a good Christian, she has bowd with Submission, and devoted her time, and all the powers of her mind to the improvement of those young persons committed to her care; by which, as she has some times Said she has alleviated her affliction. John is very well now, but he was sadly troubled with fits of the cholick for some time, so as to wake from his Sleep and cry. Some medicine which he took gave proof of the cause and he has been relieved by the discharge of several living creatures and I am now pretty well convinced that the gasping for breath which at times has been so allarming, arose from some knot of those vile reptiles.\u2014We are all in pretty good Health. I cannot add Spirits. The aspect of public affairs throughs a gloom over the approaching Spring. The Husbandman can neither till or sow with a prospect of gain; as his handmaid commerce has both her hands lop\u2019d of and her feet tied. She is laid prostrate, and her Lovers go about the Streets mourning. We may truly say add we are beset on every Side\u2014who is wise enough to say what ought to be done? I have thought the administration more blamed by the Federal party than they merrited, during these critical times. They have too closely imitated their opponents during the former administration\u2014I cannot defend very many of the measures of the Government; I think they have brought us to the present crisis of our affairs. Yet those who see but, in part, and know but in part are not the most competent judges.\nI cannot see how can congress can be be permitted to rise. The Country is so critically and so dangerously situated, that every man should be at his post. Every wind may waft as tidings of vast importance\u2014\nMrs Allcut mentiond to me when She was here, that She thought the Rooms of your House ought to be open\u2019d and aird and the furniture looked too, if you did not return early in the Spring would you have her do it, if she should be at leisure? You will write me what you would have done;\nWilliam Smith left us last week, and is gone to his Father. His attention and punctuality to his School gave great Satisfaction, and after it closed he could not bear to remain idle, and there were not any prospects for him here. His inclination leads him to the Army, and he is desirious of obtaining a commission there. His Grand Father told him he would write for him, both to the President and mr Madison and the Secretary of War\u2014I should like to know his Uncle\u2019s opinion, and if consistant with his judgement, whether he would mention him to Mr. Madison as a young man of regular habits, modest, discreet & I believe brave. I should hope that his engagement with Miranda would be no bar to his employment in the Army. He was under age, and was placed with him by those in whom he naturally confided, and knew not Mirandas views\u2014\nI should have written to mr Adams myself upon the Subject, but shall wait to hear further from William and I only mention it now, merely to know if any Scruple lies in his own mind against recommending him.\nMrs. Adams is well and her little ones, with me desires to be remember\u2019d to your Sister Buchanna.\nLouissa has been in Boston this Month\u2014or She would request a Remembrance also\u2014to you and your Friends a kiss for my Boy Charles. I suppose when I know him, he will claim an equal Share of the Love and affection of his Grandmother with his Brothers\u2014He must be very good to get as large a portion as John\u2014I shall write next to my Son.\nYour affectionate Mother\nAbigail Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1662", "content": "Title: From William Smith Shaw to John Quincy Adams, 9 April 1808\nFrom: Shaw, William Smith\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nMy dear Sir\nBoston 9 April 1808\nI had the honour to receive your letter to Mr Otis on Thursday evening last, and have attended to its publication, with as much expedition as possible\u2014The printers have published an edition of a thousand copies and the sale of them commenced this morning and the whole are now disposed of. Oliver & Munroe are now printing a second edition of a thousand more on their own account and have contracted with several of the democrats, with Eben Larkin bookseller at their head, to print three thousand more for general circulation in the Country. In consequence of the great haste with which they were printed\u2014some few errors have escaped us, which I shall see corrected in seco the second edition. I sent you several copies last evening and now send you several more by this mail\u2014I have also agreeably to your direction sent a copy to Governour Sullivan & to Mr Otis\nWhat shall I do with your tenant Guerney. I have never been able to collect a cent from him since your absence. Your order for $350 on the branch bank I have received and deposited to your account. I have paid your father eleven hundred seventy two dollars and forty nine cents agreeably to your direction\nWith most respectful attachment and ardent gratitude / I am very sincerely / your hum Sert\nWm. S. Shaw", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1663", "content": "Title: From Thomas Boylston Adams to John Quincy Adams, 10 April 1808\nFrom: Adams, Thomas Boylston\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nDear Brother\nQuincy 10th: April 1808\nI received your favor of the 30th: ult. on the 7th: current and also the pamphlet containing the documents respecting the Chesapeake. I have read the whole with attention, and am particularly impressed with the concluding letter of Mr: Madison, which is universally admitted to be a very luminous and correct State paper. That it could not be answered or refuted, is very apparent from the replication given to it, by the Envoy Extraordinary; and I feel confident, that it will diffuse a proper and just sentiment on the subject of our disputes with England, among the people; this was a thing much to be desired, in this quarter; for, I verily believe, that the federal newspapers have created great doubts in the minds of many, as to the justice and propriety of our pretentions upon the great questions, which have been agitated between our Government and Great Britain. The appearance of an undue influence on the part of France & Spain has been such as to create distrust and jealousy, and as the sources of correct information, on this point, were hidden from the view of the world, it is not surprising to me, that suspicions should grow out of a state of things, which prudence might have enjoined upon Government, as the best policy. There seemed to me in Mr. Quincy\u2019s speech upon his motion for more information upon the subject of our relations with France, sufficient grounds for such a call, and I was not at all displeased at any thing which he urged on that occasion. There has been too little apparent sensibility in the Executive to French Tyranny; too anxious a solicitude to wink at insults and to smoother complaint against injuries of a very aggravated description to which our National interests have been subject for two years past, on the part of France. To what reasons of State this policy must be ascribed, is not for me to say. I can only find one apology or palliation for it\u2014 viz the Naval impotence of France and the Naval preponderance of Great Britain. The idea of a deeply rooted hostility to Commerce, existing in the dispositions of the South, obtains fresh credit in the North, from the first imposition & long duration of the Embargo; though many other indications have been given, which tend to a confirmation of such an opinion here, this measure is viewed as the first practical illustration of a very broad theory, and I think the feelings of our people have, in many instances, been successfully assailed by the outcry which has been made on this subject. Its effects are not visible so much in those places, where we should naturally look for them, (the sea port and fishing towns) as but among the farmers; there may therefore be some falacy in the inference that the Embargo, has been an unpopular measure, even in this quarter of the Union. It is too plain that without such a precaution on the part of Government, a vast proportion of our Navigation would have encountered other perils than those of the Sea, to the utter ruin of all the Insurers on the Continent.\nSo much has been said among your constituents of your agency in the passage of the Embargo Act, from which your Colleague dissented and has taken so much pains to condemn, that I feel much rejoiced at the prospect of a publick appeal on your part, which I understand is now in the press and will appear tomorrow. Whether you adopted this idea from your own sense of its propriety and expediency, or whether the step first taken by your Colleague forced it upon you; it is a general opinion among your friends that it had become absolutely necessary. To a certain class of your Constituents it will afford no pleasure, but to those who are well intentioned towards you, it will be very grateful. It appeared to me very clearly that the disposition to appretiate the conduct of your Colleague was greatly quickened by an opposite disposition towards you, and the freedom of remark in which some Gentlemen have indulged upon the course you have pursued during the present Session, of which I, of course, have heard only a small proportion, has not been calculated to inspire your friends with any very conciliatory sentiments towards them. Their language has been full of reproach and very much in the style formerly used towards your father upon his continuing to treat with the French Government in 1799. I need not add that it has proceeded from the same sources and from a similar policy.\nFor electioneering watch-words the Junto adopted the very significant phrazes \u201cGore & no Embargo\u201d\u2014\u201cGore and free trade\u201d\u2014\u201cSullivan and starvation.\u201d If Mr: Giles has not got the right scent for cabalistick words, in his late speech, I think he might perceive the odour very strong here. The whole pack opened with this view holla, and have been in full cry ever since. I was thrown out in the first start and have never been able to come up with the hunters or even get a view of the game. I am but a poor Country Squire and ill-mounted for this kind of chase.\nTo me it was and yet is quite incomprehensible, how the election of Mr. Gore could effect the raising of the Embargo, and as to free-trade, so long as the foreign pressure existed upon our maratime rights, I could discern no other method of extricating the Nation from these difficulties, but by unconditional submission to the law of the strongest. For this step I did not feel prepared, and being rather dubious whether the non-election of the Junto favourite, would necessarily be followed by starvation, I concluded to take my chance for one year longer, under the present Governor, if he should be re-elected, leaving that event however to any body\u2019s agency but my own.\nThe votes given in are more numerous than I expected and the increase for Sullivan less. In many places there is a visible change, but as frequently in favor of one Candidate as the other. According to returns already published, Mr: Gore has a majority of two thousand and upwards, but from a paragraph in yesterday\u2019s Sentinel I infer, that Major Russell thinks Mr. Sullivan will prevail in the end. I regret, that the principles on which Mr. Gore\u2019s election was advocated were of a nature to cause the with holding from him my vote. Personal considerations had no agency in it; for surely I have no cause of dislike or enmity to the man; on the contrary I have a great respect and esteem for his character and an opinion of his talents which he would not think derogatory, himself being judge; but the party abused and vilified you for holding opinions such as Mr: Gore was said to disclaim, and as I had not passed sentence of condemnation against you for those opinions I could not sanction by my vote, those who had. Another thing, Mr: Gore was not in my judgment, the man to whom the federal party were preeminently indebted, nor for whom this mark of their favor ought at this time to have been reserved. If any other motives deterred me from voting, they were such as would receive no quarter from federalism, of course I have no pride in recording them.\nSince the fever of Electioneering is over, for the present, and the publick pulse is reduced to its usual beat, you will not expect a very rapid circulation of your communication upon the State of the Nation. No Six-thousand copies of editions will find a sale in a few hours, though it is possible some of the Newspapers of one side or the other may reprint it. With a view to the May Elections it will find its way gradually through the State, most probably by the help of the Democrats, who will father it as a refutation of the Epistle of Timothy, if for no other reason; but so many have already believed in Timothy that the gospel of John will labour hard with them. To convince the unconverted, (as our Braintree Minister who preached for us to day, would be likely to say) is as hard a task as to convert the unconvinced.\nI have made provision for discharging your Note to R Dexter, having received of Wm Shaw $130 towards it. The amount of principal and interest is $337:90; and I expected ere now to have had sufficient funds collected from your tenants here, to discharge the debt; but only one has yet paid me and that a small sum; before your return I shall settle with them all; whether for cash or approved notes is somewhat dubious. Money is said to be scarce\u2014 this I presume you have heard of before now, but I begin to think there is some truth in the story as I find it impossible to collect any for myself.\nYour children are well. John dined here to day and sends his love and duty to his parents\u2014 We heard from George a few days since, who was then in good health. My wife and children are also well and send much love to you and yours.\nFarewell.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1664", "content": "Title: From John Adams to John Quincy Adams, 12 April 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nMy dear Son\nQuincy April 12. 1808\nIn your favour of March 25th. you express a hope that nothing like a distribution of Money, among the Principal Leaders of our Parties, has occurred or will occur, among Us. I agree with you in this hope and I will add that I Still entertain this belief. At least there is no one, on whom I can fasten even a Suspicion. But that foreign Money has been received by Sebastian, has been adjudged: that it has been offered, is proved by Judge Innis\u2019s deposition. These were not leaders you will Say, true, but where did Burr obtain the Sums, adequate to his vast Expences? What Shall We Say of the Affair of Blount? Burr and Blount have been leaders. We know that certain Powers of Europe have no Scruples to employ Money with Such as will receive it, when they think they can carry any Point by it: and is not Money as well beloved and as much wanted by Some among Us, as by any in Europe?\nour Elections run very near the Wind. I have been neutral though neither Nations nor Parties will allow of Neutrality. I expect to be captured by one, or burnt or Sunk by the other. For myself I care not which. For you and your Children I am anxious. Your Letter to Mr Otis is expected to day. The Effervescence is past. The Men of twelve per Cent a Month, will not be able to afford Money to pay for printing and diffusing twenty Editions of ten thousand Copies each. What Should you Say if it should fall dead from the Press, as David Hume Says his Essay on Human Nature and his first History of England did? I believe that very little will be Said about it. Our Brutus\u2019s have not forgotten, that Cicero would not Send fifty Horse, to compel their Creditors in Cilicia to pay Eight and forty per Cent Interest. You remember how he quarrelled with the orator. Yet Brutus you know was a pure, virtuous and disinterested Republican, though a rich, haughty and covetous Aristocrat. Our Speculators have not forgotten your opposition to their Bank in the Senate of this Commonwealth.\nsour Son John dined with Us yesterday in very good health and Spirits. George is very well and a good Boy as Mrs Peabody writes in a very late Letter.\nThe Embargo tingles in every Vein. The Clamour against it will grow louder and louder and every Man who voted for it more and more unpopular with the Party who oppose it. We cannot give the Law to France nor England by this measure, and nothing is done to lay the foundation of a Navy, the only Arm that can protect Us. I See no System in the Conduct of Administration or of Congress.\nFrom the government of John Bunyans Honourable Mr Penny wise, Pound foolish, good Lord deliver Us.\nA Repeal of the Embargo Laws, would instantly expose, many rash Adventurers to burn their Sails. Arming their Vessells would be of little or no Use, without Frigates to convoy and protect them. The present Congress will never declare War against England or France. Neither of those Powers will declare War against Us, any more explicitly than they have done already. Are We then to remain for years in this Situation? We may be more disposed to War among ourselves, for what I know, than we are to fight With any foreign Power. The present humiliation of the northern States cannot long endure, without producing Passions which will be very difficult to restrain. I am weary of Conjectures.\nMy Love to your Family and all your Friends.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1665", "content": "Title: From John Adams to John Adams Smith, 15 April 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Smith, John Adams\nQuincy, April 15; 1808\nYou ask me whether \u201can armed Vessel of a belligerent Nation has a right to search a vessel of a neutral.\u201d I answer No, except for contraband of war. This exception is established by the law and practice of nations; and confirmed by Treaties. But there is no right to search for men. The King of England acknowledges that he has no right to search for men a neutral ship of war even for deserters from his own Navy. You may ask his Majesty where he finds a distinction in this respect between a ship of war and a merchant ship. He who claims a right must shew a law. Is there any divine, human, or moral law, which distinguishes Merchant ship from Military ships? Both are under the laws and Jurisdiction of the nation to whom they belong and are subject to no other, and are entitled to all the privileges of their own Country and their own laws.\nThe English nation says their men of war have no right to impress seamen from their own merchant men. Judge Foster has laboured hard to maintain that right. But the nation does not agree with Judge Foster. No act of Parliament; No Judgment of any court of law appears upon record to justify impressment. Espriella says it sometimes costs the government in Cutters, Luggers, and hired pressgangs, an hundred pounds sterling a man. The pressgangs are resisted, fought, and Leiutenants, Midshipmen, and boatswains often killed. Yet no inquisition of murder is made. Nor would any Jury in the kingdom, I beleive, find a man guilty of murder, who should kill a pressgang in defence of his liberty. Impressment of seamen in England is always a civil war. But if the right of the English to impress their own subjects from their own ships was clear they would have no right to impress even their own subjects from foreign neutral vessels ships. The pretence to this right is a shameless effrontery unprecedented in all time and in all space.\nIf a belligerent had a right to search neutrals, a neutral would have an equal right to search belligerent merchantmen. Think of the consequences. An American Gun boat would have a right to search a British East Indiaman of a thousand or twelve hundred tons burthen, mounted with fifty guns. On the contrary a British cutter or lugger of ten swivels, would have a right to search an American East Indiaman or any other American merchantman of whatever tonage.\nThink of national delicacy and dignity. Think of the spirit and courage of seamen. Can American seamen bear? ought they to bear? Ought they to submit to the tyranny of British Seamen? Will not such impressments break their hearts and put petticoats on them all? Can we ever expect to have a navy, that will stand against foreign seamen, if ours are habituated tamely and patiently to bear such indignities and injuries? Take away from a seaman his pride and his spirit, and he is no more than a Spaniel. You ask very pertinently what constitutes this right? I answer\u2014nothing\u2014there is no such right. You cannot surely ask the Question seriously whether power constitutes right. You might as well ask whether wrong constitutes right.\nThe Gambler says in a play that I read at your age \u201cFools are the natural prey of knaves: Nature made them so, when she made lambs for wolves.\u201d Upon this principle, and on this principle only can Britons ground a right to impress seamen from any American ships. The simplicity of this country in their total negligence of naval preparations may well entitle us to the character of lambs, if not of fools. And the Britons are welcome to their choice between those of Knaves or Wolves.\nThe federalists have made a great exertion in this state as well as in yours. If their object is to defend our rights, I wish them success. But if their intention is to give them up, I hope they will fail.\n&c &c\nJ. A.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1666", "content": "Title: From John Adams to William Steuben Smith, 15 April 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Smith, William Steuben\nMy dear William\nQuincy April 15. 1808.\nI thank you for your agreeable letter of 31st March from Albany.\nGrumbles at the Embargo appear to me to be mere electioneering artifices. The orders and Proclamations of the King of England, and the Decrees of the Emperor of France at Berlin and Milan, ought to be and would be an embargo, if our Government had not interfered. Perhaps some Merchants would have adventured; but it would have been only to augment the Spoliations of one power or another. It is said that Merchants are the best judges of their own Commerce and the risks they may run. As far as respects their own private individual interest this may be true of some not all of them. But none of them are the best judges of the effects of their Commerce upon the great interests of the Nation. There are higher interests in Society than Commercial interests, great and important as they are. The interests of National defence involves the lives, liberties and property of the people, and these are surely of more consequence than trade. The Agricultural interest too, is of an higher order than the Commercial, though both are naturally useful to each other at all times and necessary at some. To shew you the genius of Mercantile adventure, there is a Dutch anecdote well attested in history, which may convince you what sort of Judges some Merchants are of their own projects and of National duties, as well as interest. Prince William Henry of Orange laid siege to Antwerp, invested the City on all sides and blocked up the Port. Nevertheless, notwithstanding all his vigilance and activity, he found the inhabitants were from time to time supplied with provisions, ammunition, arms and even Cannon. With much anxiety and probably at great expense of spies & informers he at length discovered that Antwerp was supplied by a company of Merchants of Amsterdam. The Prince sent for those Merchants and reproached them severely with their ingratitude and treachery to their Country, asking them how they could be so base as to sacrifice their Country to its enemies for a paltry profit. The principal man of the Company answered that \u201ctrade ought to be free; and if it was necessary to go to Hell in the course of his Commerce he would run the risk of burning his sails.\u201d\nI wait for a letter from you at Smith\u2019s Valley. My love to your father and Mother and sister; compliments to your Uncles and Aunt. We are all well and join in regards to you all. I have had two kind letters from your brother, who writes in good spirits and seems to have a mind awake with a laudable curiosity for knowledge and ardor for study.\nI am with warm affection your Grandfather", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1668", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Abigail Amelia Adams Smith, 17 April 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, Abigail Amelia Adams\nmy dear Daughter\nSunday Quincy April 17th 1808\nIt is So long since I received a Letter from you; that I am anxious to hear from you. I have written twice Since, once before william left us; and once Since. I hope he has arrived in health and Safety; we received his Letter from Albany and heard by way of miss Hinkly, that his visit to Govenour Strong was very pleasing to the Govenour. I feel anxious for him the times are very discourageing to a young Man just entering upon the Stage of Life\u2014they cannot remain in this Stagnant State much longer\u2014we are driven up into the close corner and cannot move, but to our own loss and destruction\u2014our government seem determined to Stand Still, and wait for the Salvation of the Lord; the public are now in possession of all the documents respecting our foreign Relations. candour will allow them to be liberal, wise and just on the part of our own government, and can see nothing but forbearence Moderation and patience towards those who have abused our Moderation and insulted our patience\u2014Mr moses mission could never seriously be intended to make reperation, clogd with conditions which as an independent Nation the President could never acceed to with out a degradation of which an injured Nation, could not possibly Submit to. your Brother Thomas has inclosed to William, a Letter from your Brother JQA to mr H G otis, which will give you a fuller view of our Difficulties with England than have been known to you before I presume, and will give you his reasons for voting for the embargo, a measure he well knew which would render him very unpopular. The Letter is such as an honest upright Man, need not blush to own, disclosing facts which the Nation ought to know at this critical juncture. it is however so bitter a pill, that the Anglo Americans cannot Swallow it So they resort to revileing, and abuse, calumny and Slander to injure the writer, and to draw down vengence upon him\u2014but the curse causeless Shall not come. I never expected to see what are calld the federal papers So blindly attachd to any foreign Nation\u2014english partizens & French partizens (tho they are fewer in number) divide our country whilst the pure and Native American can Scarcly find a spot, upon which he may place his foot, and make a firm Stand against these encroachments\u2014we may truly say, we are in a strait betwixt between two\u2014\nour respective families are all well. mrs B Adams has a daughter\u2014our little ones are well. The Chinese Chatterer grows daily more interesting. we begin to look quite verdent here, the gooseburry Bushes have leaved, and our daffies are in Bloom\nMy Love to Caroline I hope an other Saturday will not pass without bringing Letters to your / affectionate / Mother\nAbigail AdamsRemember me to the col to william and all the rest of the family\u2014I hear mrs Long is gone to Scotland with her Husband", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-20-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1669", "content": "Title: From John Quincy Adams to Abigail Smith Adams, 20 April 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Adams, Abigail Smith\nMy dear Mother\nWashington 20. April 1808.\nMy wife received a few days since a letter from you, and I had the happiness of receiving one also from you, yesterday or the day before\u2014In the former there seems to be an intimation that on our part, we had not been so punctual in our correspondence with you, as our duty and affection justly requires\u2014My wife had written you not long before\u2014As for myself I have not indeed written you so often as my inclination would have dictated\u2014But I hope you will impute it to any cause rather than to a failure in the dearest of my duties\u2014Among the severest of the trials which have befallen me during the present Session of Congress (and they have been severe beyond any that I ever was before called to meet) that of having incurred in some particulars the disapprobation of both my Parents has been to me the most afflictive.\u2014Totally disconnected with all the intrigues of the various parties which have been in such a violent electioneering fermentation, I have been obliged to act upon principles exclusively my own, and without having any aid from the party in power have made myself the very mark of the most envenomed shafts from their opponents\u2014Although I attended at Mr: Bradley\u2019s Caucus or Convention, yet it has been very explicitly understood by the principal friends of the Candidates that I had no intention to become the partizan of either\u2014This neutrality with regard to persons, has of course neutralized the men of both sides in return, and having taken an active and decided part upon much of the public business, it has on one side been convenient to load me with the burthen of managing as much of it as I would assume, and on the other to leave me to defend myself as well as I could from the assailants of another Quarter\u2014Hence there has been scarcely a measure of great public importance, but I have been obliged to attend to in Committee as well in the Senate; and in addition to all the rest a question of expulsion of a member has been imposed upon me, of great difficulty respecting the forms of proceeding, and the merits of the particular case, which I have been compelled to carry through almost alone\u2014The question was taken about ten days since and the vote for expulsion was nineteen to ten. The Constitution requiring two thirds to carry the vote, it failed by a single vote\u2014I could tell you though it may not be proper to say upon paper, by what a curious concurrence of parties the ten votes of acquittal was compounded\u2014\nThe Letter of Mr: Pickering, is another document of which I could account for the origin from circumstances perhaps not known to you\u2014I was not named in that letter, but it was hardly possible for me to avoid noticing it. My Letter to Mr: Otis was written in great haste, and of course in point of composition is incorrect\u2014It touches only upon the leading inaccuracies of his statement, because both my own want of time, and a regard to the public patience, made it necessary for me to be as short as possible\u2014Yet it engrossed every leisure moment I could command for a fortnight\u2014I mention these things by way of excuse for not having written more frequently to you\u2014\nI have had no intention or desire of influencing Elections by what I have written\u2014If an impartial person will consider the situation in which I was placed by Mr: Pickering\u2019s letter, I think he will perceive that something from me was indispensible\u2014The effects of my letter, will I hope, be what was intended\u2014To promote Union at home, and urge to vigour against foreign hostile powers\u2014If federalism consists in looking to the British Navy, as the only Palladium of our Liberties, I must be a political heretic\u2014If federalism will please to consist of a determination to defend our Country, I still subscribe to its doctrines.\nMy father and brother write me that my letter to Mr: Otis will not have much circulation\u2014I know very well that argument for Embargo, will not be so catching as invective against it, and if my countrymen are not Inclined to hear me, I must bear their indifference, with as much fortitude and philosophy as I can command\u2014I should hope at least that in future, the Legislature will not be taken by surprize, and driven to imprudent measures, by having a fire-brand thrown into their windows, in the midst of their Session\u2014\nWe adjourn next Monday\u2014In a fortnight from that time, I hope to have the pleasure of seeing you, and at least at Quincy I shall be sure of meeting no altered faces\u2014I will take care of Alliborne\u2019s Bill, which you enclosed\u2014My wife and child are well.\nYour\u2019s dutifully\nJohn Quincy Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1670", "content": "Title: From John Quincy Adams to William Smith Shaw, 23 April 1808\nFrom: Adams, John Quincy\nTo: Shaw, William Smith\nMy dear Sir.\nWashington 23. April 1808.\nI have received your two letters of last Week, with a dozen copies of my letter to Mr: Otis\u2014And Mr: Gardiner\u2019s fast Sermon\u2014But the copies which you mention as forwarding with your\u2019s of the 15th: instt: have not come to hand. I thank you most cordially for the promptitude with which you executed the charge of publication\u2014I find the federal newspapers in Boston, which began with a system of silence about my letter, have at last found their tongues\u2014Of the use which their opponents make of this paper, I cannot be surprized\u2014But if there be such a person as a candid and impartial federalist (and I trust the great majority of them are such) I ask him to say who is justly chargeable with my publication, and all its effects, whatever they may be\u2014I had no party purposes\u2014No electioneering views\u2014But an attack so violent, and at such a time\u2014and in such a manner, was a strong call upon me for notice\u2014Yet I have most truly said that this alone, I would have overlooked\u2014My Motives were altogether of a public Nature\u2014\nI expect to reach home about the 10th: of next Month\u2014I would thank you to see that the family in my house, have it opened and aired a day or two before that time\u2014Mrs. Alker mentioned to my mother that she would attend to it; and I will be obliged to you to speak to her for that purpose.\nYour\u2019s faithfully\nJohn Quincy Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1671", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to John Quincy Adams, April 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Adams, John Quincy\nmy dear son\nQuincy April 1808\nA1tho I have not so frequently written to you It has not been oweing to Your having been less frequently in my Thoughts than formerly; I found it so difficult to determine from a partial view, what were the wisest and best measures for the government to pursue, in a day so dark, and in times so perilious, that Silence was best for me, after having once given my opinion upon a subject where we had differd in judgement, altho from a more clear view of the subject, and the circumstances attending it, I have been led to think of it, in a different light. We expect tomorrow to have your full view of our national affairs. Altho you must expect that it will raise a Hornets nest arround you, the Consciousness of having uprightly discharged your duty to your country, will serve to shield you from their Stings. Your Father has various times exprest a wish that you would come out, explicitly, and avow your Sentiments, and opinions, and since the publication of another Senetors celebrated Letter he has thought it a duty which you owed to yourself and your constituents\u2014as the Election in this State is now decided, it cannot be said to have been written with a desire to influence that. Both your Father and Mother attended the meeting here, but neither of them voted for Govenour. From personal Friendship they would both have been willing to have given Mr. Gore their vote, if other reasons and motives had not opperated more powerfully in their minds. Some which led them to think a Change at this critical moment might not prove favorable to the true Interest of the State. Many things may be said, which it is improper to commit to paper. To us at a distance, we cannot but look with astonishment, that no effective measures are adopted for defence even the Gun Boats are thought useless, by striping them of their men and at this eventfull crisis congress are about to rise! as tho it was a time of profound peace. I own I cannot see through the wisdom and policy which directs the counsels of the Nation.\nI will quit the Subject and say something respecting our domestic affairs. When William Smith left us he exprest a desire to obtain a commission in the Army. I knew not whether you would think it consistant with your Ideas, after what had past respecting his Father, to mention him yourself to Mr. Madison, or the Secretary of war and I should not wish, or desire you to do any thing which would look like asking a favour from any of them. I had much rather write myself to Mr. Jefferson as I shall not have any scruple in doing when I hear from William.\nYour son John is very well, grows fast. He dinned with us with us to day. George was well last week.\nI inclose my flower account which I will thank you to settle for me, as you come through Philadelphia.\nMy Love to Mrs. Adams\u2014I wrote to her about a week ago. We are all well, and shall be very glad to see you return, if you can do so, consistant with the public good.\nYour affectionate / Mother\nAbigail Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "05-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1672", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Abigail Amelia Adams Smith, 8 May 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, Abigail Amelia Adams\nMy dear Daughter\nQuincy May 8th 1808\nI took my pen to write to you this morning in a placid temper of mind; the news papers of yesterday lay by me, which I had not lookd into comeing late last evening from Boston: papers bearing the title of Federal. I found in them such a bitter Spirit of Party, such uncandid constructions, such false conclusion and, such mean crinching to one power, and such bigg Blustering against an other, that I own I felt my indignation strongly excited against the writer tho unknown to me. In every paper and upon every occasion they attack your Brother with a Venom and Spight, which shows fully how much they dread his tallents, and how keenly they feel the force of his replie to Col. Pickerings Letter. So totally devoted to the essex junto are all the Federal Printers in Boston, that they have refused to publish a single line in answer to the false and scandelous publications with which there papers have teemed ever since the Report in the case of John Smith appeard\u2014This is the fate of every public Man who wishes to do his duty with fidelity to his country, to impartially administer equal justice to all\u2014the Spirit of party has become so Rancorous that a civil war will break out, unless some method can be devised to subdue the base passions of envy, jealousy, and moderate the contending factions\u2014candour, liberality and that Charity which the Gospels so highly recommends\u2014which suffereth long and is kind, which envieth not which vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, doth not behave itself unseemly seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth. this truly Christian Spirit seems banished from the Hearts and pens of Men, and in lieu of it, Calumny and evil speaking, falsehood and deceit prevail take the lead. can the cause of truth and justice prevail when thus borne down! this is no new thing under the sun. the History of the world is full of Such base ingratitude, and for this the judgements of heaven are abroad in the Earth, and for these Sins we shall like other Nations be scourged. in proportion as our Family have been engaged in public Life have they shared from one and the other party, their full proportion of oblique and ill treatment, but I challenge either party, in their hour of calmness to produce a single instance, or one action where the honour independence and safety of the Country has not been the ultimate object of every member of the family where personal safety has not been hazarded, personal property Sacrificed and the Whole long Life of its most ancient Member Solely devoted to the public interest. Having given vent to my feelings excited by news paper revileings I quit the Subject, and its Authors, and ask forgiveness for them as I am instructed in holy writ\u2014and notice your kind Letters of March 6th and April 24th which I received both together and thank you for them\u2014to hear often from you is a great pleasure to me, one of the few left me in the decline of Life, when the days approach in which we are told there is no pleasure. there is an innocent pleasure to be derived from the renovating Season of the Spring which Charms us even in age. I feel its influence in the vivid Green which cloaths the Earth, in the beautious Blosom which adorn the trees, and in \u201cthe Charm of Earliest Birds\u201d these are all before me. the Grass waves in the wind. I never Saw it more forward at this Season. on the 24 of April we cut our first assparagrass. on the 25 our Daffies Bloomd. our peach & pear & plomb trees are in full Bloom. peas ready to stick\u2014I did not expect to hear from you, that your peas were up; I should like to have you State the progress of your vegetation that we may compare notes\u2014our Barley is also up. I am glad to find that you have been so successfull in making maple Sugar. every manafactor which will render us less dependent, is a valuable aquisition.\u2014My Immagination frequently visits you, and always find you occupied. to be Idel would be novel altogether to you. we cannot be sufficiently thankfull to our early employers instructors for teaching us habits of industery, training us up in the way we should go, that in age we may not depart from it\u2014it is a true saying, that the devil will find work for those who have not any employment. the mind is naturally active and the body requires it also\u2014\n\u201cBorn to no end, we worse than useless grow\nas waters stagnate when they cease to flow.\u201d\nMrs TBA desires me to ask you if you have not received a Letter which she wrote you in Feb\u2019ry. our little Abbe grows a little charmer. how she would delight to ramble with Caroline, and feed the chickins. She is a daily visitor to the puppy children as she calls them and runs as fast as a quail when she gets out. the little one is a very beautifull Baby, quiet as a Lamb, fine dark Eyes, and black Hair. She bids fair to out shine her Sister in personal Beauty\u2014Mrs Adams\u2019s Sister Foster has a Son about a week old\u2014Mrs B Adams has a daughter\u2014So we increase and Multiply and replenish the earth\nCharlot Welch has been with us this fortnight\u2014Susan rambles with her. She wants Caroline too\u2014Susan Scolds because Caroline does not write. your Father received Williams Letter and was satisfied with his reasons. William must continue to write. tell him it is a habit the pleasure of which increases with the practise, but becomes urksome by neglect\u2014Your Father Sends his Love to you all. Louisa Susan and all the domesticks desire me to make mention of their high consideration\u2014I believe I wrote you that Mrs Dexter and family were removed to their own House\u2014we expect your Brother and family to arrive this week. inclosed is a Letter for Caroline\u2014\naffectionatly Your Mother\nAbigail Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "05-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1673", "content": "Title: From Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to Abigail Smith Adams, 9 May 1808\nFrom: Peabody, Elizabeth Smith Shaw\nTo: Adams, Abigail Smith\nMy Dear Sister\nAtkinson May 9th. 1808\nLast Wednesday Miss Livermore was conducted by her Brother, from this House, as far as Haverhill, accompanied by Mr Eliot, for she told her Brother she would not ride with him, he looked so plaugy homely, & cross\u2014Mr Eliot should go with her, certainly as far as Haverhill where they would stop one night, for she was not able to go further\u2014The next day was fine weather & Dr Clapp was good enough to take his Horse, & go with her to Newbury.\u2014Dr Clapp, Eliot, & her Brother, arrived a thursday P.M. with her safe at her Fathers house\u2014for which I am more than glad\u2014Though I could not but reprobate her Temper & conduct, yet I could not sometimes, but lament her unhappy Situation, with tears of sincere pity\u2014She is indeed an unhappy young Lady\u2014infirm, irratable, sick\u2014Self-exiled\u2014from a Parents hospitable protecting Mansion\u2014She has found many who flatter, but few who are real Friends, few, who will perform the energies\u2014the realities of Friendship\u2014Unhappy Girl! Blessed with Opportunities, & with Intellects superior to the generality of your Sex, you have suffered them to lie dormant, or applied them to triffling Objects.\u2014You have gathered some of the flowers of Literature, without benefiting yourself, or Others by the richness, or variety of its Fruit\u2014\nUnhappy\u2014Sick\u2014Wicked\u2014Child\u2014still reverberates\u2014& dwells upon my mind\u2014All that I have done, in every attention I have payed Miss Livermore, my motives have been such as my reason approves\u2014All I regret is, that my endeavours to render her amiable, useful in life, & happy\u2014has not proved more successful\u2014\nI am thankful she is gone for my Boarders sake; for she was always saying something to vex, and corrode\u2014And for Abby, too, for she had gotten well enough to get into her chamber, & I know it hurt Abby, though she was unwilling to own it. She would sometimes cry, and tell her all her troubles\u2014& all her love affairs, & all her romantic brain could suggest,\u2014of wounded hearts\u2014& unrequited Love\u2014 Fortune ever proving, an unrelenting Foe to her\u2014Those that liked her, she hated\u2014& those she approved were inveterate towards her\u2014In one word\u2014she was ever uneasy, her temper, like an evil Genius\u2014tearing\u2014& tormenting\u2014Soul & Body\u2014Abby got so that for several nights she slept none, or an hour or two\u2014She is very feeble yet does not puke near so often, & passes more days without\u2014I fear it will be a long time before she perfectly recovers\u2014exercise in the air, is what I most depend on\u2014but I cannot go far with her at present\u2014& we hate to go puking about\u2014Nature yet assumes great regularity\u2014for which we are glad\u2014She has had a terrible cough for a fortnight, but is now better\u2014wholly owing to the irritation by puking\u2014& the wind seems like a pump\u2014My Letter thus far, is a doleful ditty\u2014I do sometimes extend my views, dear Sister, a little further than the sick Chambers\u2014& think of my Country\u2014though her prospects do not afford me a pleasant view. It is said that when knaves fall out, honest men will be righted\u2014But when men of integrity are opposed in sentiment, & conduct\u2014what will be the consequence\u2014I have always said Mr Adams, would do what he thought just & best\u2014though he knew he should be sacrificed\u2014I thank you for his Letter, I will return it when Mrs Adams makes her visit\u2014Mrs Harrods says she expects her soon\u2014I hope shall be able to have more of her company, than when she was there before We are very sorry cousin William could not make us a visit before his departure\u2014I always loved him\u2014There was a sedateness that pleased me. It was a Trait\u2014upon which discretion would naturally grow\u2014\nI wish I could do exactly as I pleased\u2014I wish I could exchange, if Abby should be well enough\u2014& have Cousin Susan come, in the way of exchange, for three months\u2014I have not said a word to Mr Peabody\u2014nor I do not know, that Abby will ever be well enough to go from home\u2014I have no Lady with me, but Mary White, & I have so many Lads, that I do not intend to take more than one female to be her company\u2014\nI should have finished this before, but the Boarders return, brought much company to the house\u2014I will send it to Haverhill by Mr Peabody who is going to attend the funeral of my much esteemed Friend Mr Atwood\u2014Alas! how frail, how uncertain, are all things here\u2014He was the Benefactor, of the widow, & the unfortunate\u2014We feel our loss\u2014& sympathise with his bereaved Partner, & her weeping Children\u2014But she has the Christian\u2019s Amour, may she find it a shield, & a firm Support\u2014I can write no more than / that I am ever yours affectionately\nE P\u2014Love where due\u2014", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "05-11-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1674", "content": "Title: From Hannah Phillips Cushing to Abigail Smith Adams, 11 May 1808\nFrom: Cushing, Hannah Phillips\nTo: Adams, Abigail Smith\nMy Dear Madam\nScituate May the 11th. 1808.\nI had the happiness of receiving your excellent letter at Middleton, for which my heart is alive to gratitude. My dear Connexions were thankful for your kind rememberance of them. We returned home last week, & expect to set out for Portsmouth next Mony, when we hope to have the satisfaction of passing some social hours at Your Mansion. Excuse the brevity of this my Dear Friend, as many cares devolve upon me at present. My Dear Sisters Mrs Bowers, & Mrs Jackson are hear. They unight with me in every sentiment of respect to you, & the President\nH Cushing", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "05-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1676", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Caroline Amelia Smith De Windt, 28 May 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: De Windt, Caroline Amelia Smith\nMy Dear Caroline:\nQuincy, May 28th, 1808.\nYour letter of May the 8th, your grandpapa brought home with him from church, on Sunday the 20th; owing to sickness I was not able to go, and am yet confined to my chamber. My fever and cough are both leaving me, and I hope a few days more will give me health sufficient to enjoy the fine season.\nI have been reading a novel called the Wild Irish Girl. Why the term wild is given, I know not, unless as a ridicule upon those who imbibe national prejudices, merely from vague report. She is represented as living in an ancient barony with her father, who in the wars had been despoiled of his property, and had retired with his daughter, her old nurse, and Father John, a learned, polite, and liberal minded priest, from whom she received her education. Here she lived, a recluse from the world, but with a lively imagination, a sportive fancy, a devotion to music, which she practised upon her harp, the favourite instrument of her country. She studied, and was perfectly versed in the historic knowledge of her native land; as a resource, she became a botanist, and on a thousand occasions, displayed such a love of nature and its productions, which she describes so artlessly, with such a vivid display of superior powers, that she charms and enchants the reader. She had gathered the first rosebud of the spring, which she had watched with much care, and presented to a young stranger, whom chance had led to the barony, and who had for some months been an inmate there, and who at the request of her father had been her preceptor in drawing. In return she repeated to him a little ode from the French. \u201cOh beautiful! beautiful!\u201d exclaimed Glorvina, \u201cI thank you for this beautiful ode; the rose was always my idol flower in all its different stages of existence; it speaks a language my heart understands, from its young bud\u2019s first crimson glow, to the last sickly blush of its faded bloom; it is the flower of sentiment in all its sweet transitions; it breathes a moral, and seems to preserve an undecaying soul in that fragrant essence which still survives the bloom and symmetry of the fragile form which every beam too ardent, every gale too chill, injures and destroys.\u201d\nYour little darling A. has been sick, and looks like the flower or the bud in its faded form, which I have just been describing; more interesting in decay than bloom\u2014one exciting all the pleasing sensations, the other a softer and tenderer sentiment.\nOur friends here are all well. To-morrow will be our general election day; the embargo should not be complained of by the federalists, for it has increased their number ten fold, and will be like to give them such a weight in the councils of the nation, as no other measure of a peaceable kind could have effected.\nWith the love and affection of the whole family, jointly and severally, I close my letter to my dear Caroline, and am her truly affectionate grandmother,\nA.A.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "06-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1677", "content": "Title: From Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to Abigail Smith Adams, 15 June 1808\nFrom: Peabody, Elizabeth Smith Shaw\nTo: Adams, Abigail Smith\nMy Dear Sister\u2014\nAtkinson Jun. 15th 1808\nI received your kind letter, with the sum enclosed for Mr Little. Butter has, since yours was engaged, fallen to fifteen Cents pr pd\u2014but we have had none yet, under a shilling\u2014It is very mortifying to the Farmers to bring their produce so many miles, & have to take a quarter less than they expected\u2014An high price, has for many years sweetened their Labour\u2014& their heavy toils have been lightend, by increasing Wealth\u2014\nEvery Class of People seem to be hanging their Harps upon the Willow, suffering, or foreboding Evil\u2014But none feel distress more immediately, than those who do buisness upon the mighty Waters, & have ploughed the Deep, to get their bread\u2014Totally unaccustomed to fell the lofty Forrests, or to dig, the Earth\u2014& sow the grain, how shall they gain subsistance for their dependant Families\u2014Was there just Cause for War, was it to defend virtuous Liberty, our natural Rights, our Country\u2014with pleasure, I could see our Sons, gird on the Sword, martial their Hoste, & like Cornelia, I would contribute my all, for their Support\u2014But now\u2014how puerile, how weak, how impolitic the pretext\u2014Alas! what can feeble Woman do to avert the uplifted Sword, but ardently petition Heaven, to \u201cSend forth the saving Virtues round the Land, In bright Patrol\u201d\u2014\nI find your eldest Son shares the same fate with his predecessors in public office, that is, have his best motives misconstrued\u2014But I trust his integrity will uphold him, and his knowledge of National Interests, eventually convince all, that he is not actuated by sinister motives, but that their best good, is his Ultimate Object\u2014Mr Quincy is very eloquent in Congress, & appears to be an able advocate for his Constituents\u2014\nThe above has lain this fortnight for Time, to give me one kind favourable moment, to finish what I had to say at present, & send it on Post haste\u2014Since your last Letter, we have had Cold, & Wind, & a dreadful Storm\u2014enough to satisfy all the \u201cCroakers,\u201d that Winter would not perish in the Sky\u2014& that the serene, pleasant Sunshine, was only the Halcyon Days, which we too often find the prelude to dark, & tempestous Seasons, both in the natural and moral World\u2014\nI am very glad to hear Cousin William is with you, as he had not opportunity given him to finish his Collegiate course, he can now take hold of them, perhaps, to greater advantage, under the Patronage of his venerable learned Grandfather, than he could, even, at the best University\u2014I am fully convinced the advantages my Son, received from a like situation, under your parental beneficent roof, priviledged with the best Society, & the best of Books were more than he obtained the whole four years he spent at Cambridge\u2014It is true, that I believe, he looks back, with regret, & thinks his Time & opportunities might have been much better improved\u2014\u201chave borne to heaven more welcome tidings\u2014It is greatly wise, to talk with our past Hours,\u201d & I hope he does not neglect this important duty\u2014Nor would I have him forget, to look forward, and secure a prudent, virtuous, sensible, partner, to partake of his joy, & of the Sorrows, which are inevitable, in this Vale of Tears. How does our distressed Phebe do? I have thought much of her, in this cold weather\u2014When she leaves this, I hope she will arrive at a better Country\u2014where pain, & sorrow never reach\u2014\nMaster George is well\u2014sends duty, & Love. When it is weather he cannot attend in the Academy he studies at home, Abby assists him in parsing, & is very fond of him\u2014\nWe had a few days of fine travelling, and we were full of company all the time, since that we have had bad colds, & one of my family taking with puking, & incessant sickness of the Stomack which lasted four days, & to day, is full of pain, & fever\u2014This must apologize for my not writing before, & sending Mr Little\u2019s Bill to you\u2014\nWith sincere love, & affection for you all of both dear families, I am ever yours\u2014\nE\u2014Peabody", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "06-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1678", "content": "Title: From Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to Abigail Smith Adams, 18 June 1808\nFrom: Peabody, Elizabeth Smith Shaw\nTo: Adams, Abigail Smith\nAtkinson June 18th. 1808\nMr Lion and his intended I suppose so, as the modern phrase is, called here last Wednesday\u2014I was very glad to see any one from your house, that could give me any information of my Dear Sisters health & welfare\u2014I told Mary, she I fancied, was going to add one more pair to the Nuptial Circle of your Dometicks\u2014She with down cast smiling simpers, blushed the Affirmative\u2014\nShe talked as if she could not return to Quincy, but said you did not know of her tarry at home\u2014I then urged her to return for this Summer, as I presumed it would be a disappointment to you, & leave an unfavourable impression upon your mind,\u2014respecting the fairness of her conduct, as she acknowledged you, & the family had treated her with the greatest kindness\u2014\nI was very glad to have my Son come, though his Visit here was short, as Abby was very desirous of seeing her Brother, and would often wonder why he could not come\u2014He sees her so little, that he cannot love her half so much as he ought\u2014Dear Girl, if pain, and sickness long and peculiarly destressing, give her any claim to his esteem, & attention, she stands high on the list\u2014Her patience under suffering, I hope, arises from a better Source, than a mere happy temper\u2014\nI have not heard one word how our dear George does, since his return to his Parents\u2014He certainly was as extraordinary a Child as I ever knew\u2014I regretted Abbys sickness upon his account, for she delighted to assist him in English Grammer\u2014& he seldom forgot what she told him\u2014He was apt to be peevish sometimes, but we could always talk, & reason him into good humour\u2014\nMr Peabody & I have been called to attend his Sister Mary, to the house appointed for all the living\u2014She died sudden at last, though she was very unwell for several weeks\u2014I hope her exchange of worlds, has been happy\u2014 she was a kind, inoffensive, worthy woman\u2014In early life met with a sad dissappointment\u2014& been like a lone solatary Dove ever since\u2014Out of eight Children Mr Peabodys Brothers and Sisters, only three remain\u2014& we are all, aged, & are swiftly \u201cmarching downward, to the Tomb\u201d\u2014 That we may stand, with loins girded up, ready to obey our heavenly Summons, is devoutly to be wished\u2014\nMy Dear Abby remains very feeble, has a fever every day, and is unable to set up all day, She rides out, & always feels better\u2014but seems too sick yet to go as far as Quincy\u2014\nIt requires not a little self-Government, to see in the papers, & to hear the unjust Censure, & the reproaches cast upon a Man, who I believe has been actuated by no sinister motives, nor a disposition to change, but from reflection, and agreeably to the dictates of his conscience, & best Information he could obtain, from the best Authority\u2014I cannot believe that he wished any one to yield implicit obedience to the mandate of a Despot\u2014or even to the best President\u2014If any thing droped of the kind, it must have been qualified\u2014I think.\nI find people differ in their Opinion respecting the policy, and wisdom of Mr Adams\u2019 resigning his seat in Congress\u2014\nIn great haste I must with proper regards to the President, & all your family, your affectionate\n Eliza. Peabody", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "06-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1679", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Abigail Amelia Adams Smith, 19 June 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, Abigail Amelia Adams\nmy dear daughter\nQuincy June 19th 1808\nHere we are Sitting by a good fire in the parlour, and wearing, our winter coats to meeting, whilst our windows are coverd with a profusion of roses, our Wall\u2019s decorated with flowers expanding their Beauties to the cold Northern blast, which rudely lacerates their delicate texture, unmindfull of their Beauty; and headless of their fragrance.\nI rose the other morning delighted with the visit I had made you; and the pleasing interview I had with you, and the Coll. William your Brother Mrs. St. Hillair, all but my dear Caroline not least beloved, whom I did not see. Your Father accompanied me, and we came rather unexpectedly upon you, but were not the less joyfully received. I was quite delighted with your situation, and found you so cheerfull and happy, that it augmented the pleasure of my visit which was only interrupted by the strikeing of the clock at the morning hour when I usually rise. Altho only a dream it left upon my mind so pleasing an impression, that I could not refrain communicating it at the Breakfast table, and calling upon the family to participate the pleasure.\nIt is some time since I received a Letter from you. Susan received one from Caroline of May 25th a few days since, full of her lovely lively spirits which delighted us all. I have been much confined at home from indisposition, for three weeks to my chamber with a bad cough and some fever: it has now left me, altho a change of weather produces a hoarsness. I have not been in Boston since your Brothers return there. He comes to Quincy almost every Saturday, and passes Sunday with us, but yesterday the rain and storm prevented him. Miss Kitty Johnson has been with us the week past, Altho she has not so many personal Charms as Eliza, her manners are more correct, and pleasing to me. I think she resembles her Mother in person and manners more than any of her other of her daughters. Our little Abbe is gone with her Aunt Mary to Haverhill. You may easily immagine how much we miss her. Mrs. James Foster has an other son\u2014thus for domestick occurrences.\nYou have no doubt seen that our state Legislature and senate have a federal majority, and that they have elected Mr. Loyed a Senator to congress in the room of your Brother. Mr. Loyed is the only son of Dr Loyed, a Merchant, a gentleman of tallents & Education, of a fair and honorable Character, whom I presume will not discredit the State\u2014How much of an Essex Man he is, Time will disclose. During the present session of the House, a number of Resolutions were brought forward, and adopted, with instruction to the Representitives and Senators, to use their influence in congress to carry them into effect. Those of them which recommend a Navy for the defence of our harbours and commerce, and fortifications for our security, not only your Brother, but every Man who is sensible of our exposed Situation, and the allarming State of our Country with respect to Foreign powers, would most readily assent to, but these resolutions were connected with others which calld for a decided opposition to the National Government, and in the view of your Brother, relinquished our Neutral Rights, and deserted our Seamen Subjects which he had ardently mantaind, and strenuously asserted against British orders, and French Edicts, and which he considerd as essential to our independence. Consistant therefore with his principles, he could not any longer hold his seat in the Senate. He resignd it, by a Letter to the two Houses, like an honest Man and true American.\nThe Federal Party have acted towards him a most ungenerous part\u2014one which no honest Man can justify. They have vilified, abused and calumniated him because he could not adopt their principles, and become a party man, because he would have an opinion of his own. Every federal printer in Boston, refused to publish any thing which was written by way of justification, or explanation of his conduct. Let us pull him down, by any means, and any falshood, was the language of their conduct: the Republicans saw this, and eagerly caught the occasion to place him upon their side, and support him by their votes. This exasperated the federalist\u2014and they rejected a man whose conduct and principles will reflect honour upon his country in Spight of all their mean jealousy, and narrow views. The Republicans have acted towards him, with more candour and liberality than they usually practise. They have not resorted to flattery but represent him as he really is, a man of a candid liberal mind, free from party views, of a pure heart, and unblemished Character, of distinguished tallents and integrity.\u2014 I cannot say that he has not felt, being wounded in the House of his Friends, yet his elevation of mind will enable him to bear with mildness and patience the jealousy of his equals, Which upon this occasion has been very conspicuous, the ill treatment of his fellow citizens, and the calumnies of his Enemies, being fully sensible that true greatness of Soul consists in Suffering these Trials without complaining, or abateing any thing of zeal for the public good. Plutarch observes that the ill usage of our Country, like that of our Parents, should be borne with Submission.\nI must close this Letter with my best Love and regards to the Coll, who has Shared largely in these Bounties of his Country and who knows how to estimate good report, and evil report.\nVerily there is a Reward for the Righteous. Let us act consciencously and leave the event.\nWith Love to every Branch of your Family from every twig of ours\u2014I am my dear daughter / Most affectionately / Your Mother,\nAbigail Adams\u2014", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "07-31-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1681", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Abigail Amelia Adams Smith, 31 July 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, Abigail Amelia Adams\nQuincy July 31. 1808\nDo you know my Dear Daughter that the date of your last Letter was the 3 of June, since which I have not received a line from you. Perhaps you may have been occupied as I have been by a large family\u2014Providence has been so bountifull to us this Season in the rich and ample supply of Grass, that we can neither procure sufficient hands to cut it; or Barns ample large enough to contain it. we have already cut 50 ton of English Hay, and shall nearly make an hundred. such a Grass Season was never known before. the misfortune is that labour is higher than I ever knew it, it being now in such demand, and Hay so low as to be sold at 7 dollars pr ton\u2014we have employd 12 Men for three weeks past, and for them were obliged to send more than 20 miles. I hope we shall finish in a week more\u2014but the Season has been so wet, that the Farmers have had bad luck in making their Hay. fruit will be very scarce, partly oweing to the rain and partly to a late frost which occasiond it to drop from the trees\u2014corn looks well. Barley not so good. whilst Heaven is pouring down upon us plenty, and abundence, blessing us with a season also of Health, we are murmuring and contending at our Rulers, at their Laws and restrictions\u2014that we have had a weak, timid cowardly administration is most certainly true, and that these measures have brought us into the present difficulties under which we are now suffering from the unjust decrees of one power, and the Hostile orders of counsel of an other power, I have no doubt\u2014these led to the oppressive Embargo, which has cut up our Commerce; dispersed our Seamen; and brought distress upon the whole country, which and will terminate I fear in disobeidence to the Laws in insurrection and civil war, if a Foreign war does not prevent it\u2014The Embargo must be repealed, and the vessels permitted to arm. the people of the Northern States will not suffer it to continue much longer.\nWe are, says a late writer the inhabitants of, a wicked and avaricious world. To grant one privilege and to submit to one insult, is proved by a thousand instances only to be the invitation to others, to proclaim aloud that, we will not defend ourselves or our property; that we will even destroy our implements of defence is the plainest language for the assassin and the Thief.\nDoes all History present us with an other such picture as Spain\u2014a Monarck resigning, his crown, and commanding all his subjects to submit without a struggle to a foreign power?\nAugust 8th\nMy Letter has lain for a week because I could not find time to fill up my paper. the weather has been intensly hot; and we have had company almost every day; there is not any Solitude or retirement in our House now. Abigail is as wild as a Bird, and flies in all directions, and I have little John here too, he came sick from Boston a month ago, fallen away so that you would not have known him pale as a corps and so languid I thought he was going into a decline but he has finely remited, and is driving round, now with Abbe enough to \u2014here sits Susan too, for, I have fled to your chamber as the quiet spot in the house, writing a Letter to her mother, interupting me every few moments with some question (hold your peace, Hussy) whom I expect here soon with Abbe\u2014I suppose you are not unacquainted with her dissapointment\u2014the Gentleman has lost all his property\u2014if he ever had any; I own I have my Doubts\u2014there are so many imposters in the world that I think the greatest caution necessary inquiry ought to be made; every man can tell his own story, but who knows, more about him than what he relates of himself? his employment in this country must be known here\u2014His story is that his Brother has ruind him, and that he has lost 80 thousand Dollars\u2014he returnd according to his engagement, and I presume offerd to Mary, from what she writes, but I believe Sally declind at present; I do not know sufficiently respecting the Gentleman to make up an accurate judgement. She is comeing to make me a visit. I shall then learn more about him\u2014our Friends are all well Your Brother J Q A has become a private Man again to my intire satisfaction. I never saw him in better health or Spirits. The responsibility he felt, the weight of buisness which devolved upon him the last session of congress, being upon every committee but three during the whole Session, kept him always anxious, and thinking differently upon public questions from his constituents. They sacrifised him to party views with a Malicious jealousy which will disgrace them in the Eyes of all those who are not devoted to Mammon. a more upright or honest man they never will find\u2014but in times like the present, the post of honour is a private Station\u2014\nwe know not one day what an other will bring forth the whole world is in a turmoil. Since I began this Letter accounts have reachd us, of the resistance of Spain to the usurpations of Beuonaparte. I most cordially wish them success\u2014we shall feel the effects of the revolution and find new arguments for removeing the Embargo.\u2014the office of president has ever been Stuck with thorns. It daily becomes a more difficult one to weild\u2014A wise Man would find it a Hurculean task\u2014who will Guide the helm upon the tempestous ocean I know not\u2014there will be a Struggle I presume\u2014Give my Love to William and tell him to write to us. I have a Letter from Caroline\u2014I shall write next to her\nI inclose a Letter for her which came from Newark\u2014write to me my dear daughter, if it be only to tell me of your various occupations. Love to the Col. to William & Caroline\nFrom your truly affectionate / Mother\nAbigail Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "08-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1682", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Abigail Amelia Adams Smith, 29 August 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, Abigail Amelia Adams\nMy dear Daughter\nQuincy August 29 1808\nDo you know how long a time has elapsed since you wrote a single line to your Mother? You did not use to be thus neglectfull of your pen: I am myself frequently tardy, but I believe unless the post has failed: that I have written twice, Since I recieved a Letter from you. Caroline has written once to me: and once to Susan so that my mind has been releived from the apprehension that you were sick. I have had an ill turn, and been confined to my chamber for a week past, with complaints similar to those which at this Season usually afflict me, an irregular intermitting fever, and Rhumatic complaints united\u2014my head much affected, which has prevented my writing before. It is so common for me to be indisposed that it Seems a matter of course: but your Aunt Cranch has been much more sick than I have; being confined to her Bed with a Virtigo in her Head, so that she cannot bear a Ray of light, or walk or Stand a moment. She has taken an Emetic and been Blisterd, but is not yet relieved. You will easily conceive how much her sickness has added to my anxiety and distress\u2014that she to whom I am so much indebted for the tenderest care, and assiduity, when I have been brought low. should herself want that aid, I am unable to afford her: it has so happend; that this is the Season when Mrs Greenleaf and family make their visit; she is there fortunately, alltho encumberd with 5 children, and near being confined with her Sixth. Yet why should I say encumberd; doth not the Scripture Say, that children are an Heritage of the Lord? and is not every married person desirious of building up a family. Is it not their duty to do so. He who says, or lives as if he thought that \u201cit is good for man to be alone gives the lie to his Maker; sins against the constitution of his nature, dishonours his Parents; defrauds another of one of the justest rights of humanity and exposes himself to commit offences against Society,\u201d says good Dr. Hunter in his sacred Biography or history of the Patriarchs, a course of Lectures which I have lately been reading, and with which I have been highly pleased. I wish I could convey them to you. they are instructive, and entertaining, excellent family Books. I should be delighted to have my Caroline read them. You must read Uncle justise this admonition\u2014Altho seperated from you as appears to me, a much greater distance than when you resided in the city of N York, my imagination follows you: and I think of you hourly, regret the Seperation, and mourn that my only Daughter cannot more frequently visit her Parents. yet I check myself, and say am I not ungratefull? Has she not been with me through many of my most Dangerous, and painfull sicknesses, a solace and comfort and consolation to me. might she not be placed in circumstances much more distressing for me to reflect upon?\nHow is my dear William, laid aside his pen for the implements of Husbandery. Can the wilderness make him forget the social fire side of Quincy\u2014the Slate and pencil of his Grandfather over which he last Winter spent so many\u2014shall I say pleasent, or usefull Evenings? From John we hear pretty often, He and his Grandfather are still correspondents\u2014He writes for information, and instruction, which his Grandfather readily communicates\u2014I expect Susan\u2019s Mamma & Sister every day to spend some time with me. She seems to be unfortunate in her expected connexion, and Sausy Susan says, sighs and groans, as much as if she was a young Girl\u2014for the slut got her Letters to me and read them. You know she is too knowing in some things for her years. Caroline says to Susan\u2014write me any thing but politicks\u2014If you say so too, I shall hardly know how to comply. yet they are very vexatious topicks. But who can feel indifferent when the prevalence of Party Spirit, distorts every effort for the public good into a conspiracy to overturn the constitution; and native Americans unite with foreigners to degrade the hand which gave them Birth and Humiliate themselves to become tributary vassels\u2014The vile spirit of Party, Sacr has sacrificed at their shrine, honour integrity and talents. That corresponding opinions prevail in other states, I will coppy from the Newspaper an Extract of a Letter from a Gentleman in South Carolina to his Friend in this State \u201cThe shamefull neglect of talents of integrity and manly candour and firmness, which has occured with you in leaving out John Q Adams as Senator, excites here universal Sympathy in his favour, and a corresponding disgust at the conduct of his opposers. I hear him spoken of with enthusiastic admiration, and I make no doubt but that the ill usage he has received, will in the long run, prove highly advantageous to him\u201d\nWith respect to the Letter so much the subject of federal censure and abuse, there is every thing in it, which constitutes an upright honest candid Man, who loves his country better than Gold: and who dared to Strip the mask from the face of deformity\u2014and hold up to public view the true and real picture\u2014I consider it as a family trophy\u2014as a coat of Arms and pride myself more in being the Mother of such a Son, than in all the honours and titles which Monarch could bestow\nI am disgusted when I see low artifice substituted, for candor, falshood for truth, and the same arts resorted to support a good cause, which were used to accomplish a bad one. it has been publicly asserted that your Father has said that he fully approved of the present Administration. nothing could be more false. He must first condemn all the great leading principles of his own which were neither weak, or timid, rash or voilent, cruel or vindictive\u2014they were the Halcion Days of America. What is to be our future Lot\u2014Heaven only knows. May the Righteous few save our Land\u2014\nour Friends here are well, save those I have mentiond.\u2014Remember me affectionatly to the Col., to William and Caroline. I hope Mrs. St. Hilliar has recoverd from her fall. For a sprain when first done, a Tea Kettle of cold water poured upon it in a Stream; is the best thing, I ever saw used, tho painfull it is salutary.\nOur little Abbe is a delightfull sensible forward child, but Eliza is the Beauty\u2014fine large chesnut Eye, black hair, and fair skin, short Limbs round face and a quiet child\nI must bid you good night or I shall get a sleepless night\u2014and then it will all be attributed to writing\u2014Your ever affectionate / Mother\nAbigail Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "10-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1684", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to William Smith Shaw, 1 October 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Shaw, William Smith\nDear Sir\nQuincy october 1st 1808\nShall we ever have the pleasure of a visit from you at Quincy. I can Scarcly credit that you Should be so intirely weaned from a place, and Friends whom you once loved and esteemed. I know your avocations are numerous\u2014your time fully occupied, but you may have leisure to visit the Atheneum, when your Friends here are to be no more seen. your uncle and Aunt Cranch have both been very sick. your Aunt more so than I ever knew her; Save once She is still very low. your good Sister is with her, administring to her comfort. A dear amiable Girl she is. you do not know her worth\nI expect your mother next week\u2014\nI inclose you a Letter which came under cover to your uncle\u2014I think it is time to remind our Tennant that he must pay up his Rent in october. He will cry out the Embargo\u2014but milk has not borne a less price than formerly, and he was very neglegent before the embargo commenced\u2014it is no favour to a man to let him run behind hand. I am not for being hard with him and we have waited upon him patiently\u2014it would be well for you to inquire into his circumstances, and whether he was a punctual man where he formerly lived\u2014if he cannot pay his Rent, he had better quit the Farm at the expiration of his year. can you procure for me corrinna in Itally? affectionatly Your Aunt\nAbigail Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "10-03-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1685", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Abigail Amelia Adams Smith, 3 October 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, Abigail Amelia Adams\nMy dear Daughter\nQuincy October 3d 1808\nI began a Letter to you on Sunday last in which I informed you that your Sister S. Adams and Abbe arrived here the week before in good health & spirits, that they left your Mother Sisters & Son well. John has written me a Letter by them which is the first I have received from them him, tho he frequently writes to his Grandfather. I shall not fail replying to him. Susan has been a month at Atkinson, and Abbe Shaw with me untill last week when her Aunt Cranch sent for her to be with her. It is more than a Month Since my dear Sister has been confined by Sickness to her Chamber, and Bed part of the time. She was seizd with a voilent virtigo in her head, so that she could neither walk or stand or raise herself up in Bed. This continued a fortnight, before she was able to sit up. Mr Cranch was suddenly seizd with a cholora Morbus which in a few hours, reduced him to a state little better than death. Her exertions were much beyond her Strength to attend upon him. He has recoverd but is still weak pale and feeble. The next calamity was Kathe the old faithfull domestic was seizd with a Lung fever, and confined to her Bed. All these things contributed to keep your Aunt low and the Rhumatic complaint from her head attacked the Kidneys and produced an excrutiating Strangry. Bleading and Baths were the only releif she found, and she is now confined more reduced than I ever knew her before. For myself\u2014you know the fall months are very unpropitious to me. I am frequently confined for a week, or ten days, weather the attack, and get out again. This has been the case for a Month past. Thus much for the dismalls.\u2014I have to acknowledge the receipt of your Letter of August 23d which I had impatiently waited for, and which you had delayd because you had not \u201cany thing worth communicating.\u201d\nTo know that you are well, that you have Bread to Eat, and Raiment to cloath you, are Subjects of no Trivial import, and communicate pleasure to me, as the reverse would be most painfull. Your account of the plentifull Harvest you have gatherd in, leaves no anxiety upon the mind respecting want. We may truly say with respect to our Country, that our lines have fallen to us in pleasent places, and that we have a goodly Heritage where famine which frequently distresses other countries, is unknown here: it is true, we have not always power over our own lot, to carve it out as we please, but the mind has power over itself; and happiness has its Seat in the mind, not in external circumstances, for we frequently see the most affluent, the most discontented and unhappy.\nOur dear Carolines chit chat Letters amuse and divert us. So lively so gay, like the Bird which hops from spray to spray and carols as he sits imparting pleasure to his fellow Songsters, and all who hear: sweet age of innocence, the mind pure the Heart uncorrupt. You wish to look in upon your Friends here and know, how they do\u2014Mrs. Beal and family well. Mrs. Wales has a son. Mrs. T Greenleaf no great alteration there. Mrs. Black much fallen away from long and tedious sickness, recoverd so as to be abroad. Mrs. D Greenleaf fat and hearty. Mrs. Millar and family well. Mrs. Pickering just got to Bed with a son\u2014In Boston your Brother Sister and children well, meaning Charles\u2014John been at Quincy with me all summer. George grown a steady Pup, goes to school steadily. Mr. Smith and family all well. Dr. Welch reduced very low from a Carbuncle upon his left hand\u2014threatned with a mortification, Saved by laying it open to the Bone\u2014near three months since it first began\u2014Charlot at Northhampton.\u2014Mrs. Storer and family well\u2014Dr. and Mrs. Tufts tolerabley ther invalides\u2014Mr. and Mrs. C Tufts well. Quincy with the Ague and fever, caught at the springs. So much for Domestick affairs. Now for a seasoning of politicks. First then I most Sincerely wish Success to the Spanish patriots, and hope the destroyer of Nations has finished the part permitted him to act by an overruling providence, who has destined him to Scourge them, and to punish them. Here I cannot forbear transcribeing a Character drawn of him by an able pen Dr. Rush. In a Letter to your Father he thus describes him, \u201cto the levity of a French Man, he unites the phelegm\u201d of a German, the avarice of a Dutchman the coldheartedness of a Russian, the solidity of an Englishman, the gravity of a Spainiard, the subtlety of an Italian and the cruelty of a Turk.\n\u201cIn no one part of his conduct do we trace the least resemblance of any one of the virtues that rescued the name of Alexander and Ceasar from total infamy. He is devoid of the occasional magninimnity of the former, and the habitual clemency of the latter.\u201d I wish that our many vices and crimes may not draw down upon us the just vengence of offended heaven, and that he may no further be permitted to become our Scourge than he already has. If we are drawn into a war, the concequences may be similar to those of other Nations. With respect to our own National affairs, I hope we have not yet so far forfeited the protection of Providence, as to be governd by our own vices and passions, but that we may be directed to men and measures which will prosper still secure to us our national prosperity, Security and independence. That the Spirit of party may be divested of its malignity, that Charity peace and harmony may prevail amongst us, and render us still happy and successfull as a Nation is the Sincere wish and prayer of your / truly affectionate / Mother,\nAbigail AdamsPS\u2014Family Love accompanies this to every Branch of yours.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "10-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1686", "content": "Title: From John Adams to John Adams Smith, 10 October 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Smith, John Adams\nMy dear Grandson\nQuincy. Oct 10. 1808.\nIt gives me great pleasure to observe in your letter of the first of this month your increasing thirst for knowledge and attachment to your profession. Your natural aversion to politics will soon too soon wear away. A lawyer must be a politician. It is impossible to avoid it; he breathes constantly in a political atmosphere. The companies with whom he associates are all politicians. Judges, lawyers, Clerks converse on no other subject. Have a care however of Machiavel, Ignatius Loyola, and all the pharisaical tribe. Despise and abhor all their maxims. Preserve the natural feelings of your heart, and the unadulterated dictates of your understanding and politics will do you no harm.\nThe law is a laborious profession. Nocturna versate manu, versate diurna, her voluminous treasures.\nYour fondness for New York is natural amiable and laudable. Settle in it if you See a prospect of success.\nBacon\u2019s abridgment is a work of reputation but not of authority. No doubt your time will be employed to Some good purpose in reading it. But I Should have thought Lord Chief Justice Coke\u2019s commentary upon Littleton and his other institutes better to succeed Blackstone. Original authors I have always thought Should precede compilations. As I keep no copies of my letters to you I hope you will excuse my old memory, if I repeat, what I may have often Said or written to you before. There are books perhaps now out of fashion which I found an advantage in reading, such as Lord Hale\u2019s history of the common law; Fortescue, de laudibus legum anglia, Trials per pais doctor and student, Howell\u2019s institute of the law in imitation of Justinian, Bracton Britton, Flita and Glanville. Vetero favites I think is the best rule. Barrington\u2019s observations on the statutes is also a good book.\nNothing is of more importance to a lawyer than to get the titles of the law well fixed in his mind as you may from Blackstone\u2019s analysis and then acquire by practice and habit, a readiness in turning to tables and indices, and from these to the titles and passages you Seek.\nThe civil law Should not be wholly neglected; I shall not advise you to read the pandect and all the innumerable and immeasurable volumes of the Commentaries upon it. But the institutes of Justinian, and especially the definitions in it, deserve your early attention\u2014\nThe nature and different forms of government ought to be well considered. I do not mean that you should read Aristotle, Plato, Polybius, Hobbes, Harrington, Sidney and a hundred others at present. But De Lolme\u2019s essay on the Constitution of England and Lord Bolingbroke\u2019s political works are very proper to succeed Blackstone.\nAs to the impressment of Seamen, consider what it is even in England. It is an abuse. It is against Magna Charta, and the first principles of their constitution. It violates every right of a British subject; but it is tolerated or rather connived at as an abuse upon an alleged principle of necessity.\nTo pretend to extend this abuse to foreign Ships and formally to assert it as a right and command it to their officers as a duty, is a stretch of arbitrary power, that I could not have thought even England or France capable of.\nThe remainder of this year will be passed in a violent electioneering fermentation, and the ensuing Session of Congress will be Stormy. The new aspect of affairs in Spain will embarrass the administration and what they will do with the embargo, I cannot conjecture. Peace is my dear delight; but the peace of a church yard is not compatible with the wants and wishes of living men. I hope we Shall not incur the censure of Tacitus\n\u201cSolitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.\u201d\nMy age and my inclination lead me to acquiesce in whatever is to come; like the Scotch Shepherd I Say, \u201cThe weather tomorrow shall be such as I please.\u201d \u201cSuch as God pleases you mean\u201d said the traveller. \u201cWell\u201d replied the shepherd \u201cWhat pleases him pleases me.\u201d I am determined to be pleased as well as I can, who ever is president, or whether we have embargo or no embargo, war or peace. And in either case I shall be a peaceable citisen. I will venture however to say that I hope we shall not go to war with the spanish patriots for whom I feel an irresistible sympathy. When the French attempted to abolish their monarchy and all their ancient institutions and erect a levelling democracy I thought they were attempting impossibility. I pitied their errors, deplored their cruelties, and could not hope for their Success, because I know it was not in the nature of things nor in the order of providence.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "11-03-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1687", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Abigail Amelia Adams Smith, 3 November 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, Abigail Amelia Adams\nmy dear daughter\nQuincy Novbr. 3d 1808\nYour Letter of Sepbr 25 together with Carolines came safe to hand, but I have been in a kind of Turmoil ever since, and never felt retired, or quiet enough to sit down to my pen. It is a great misfortune to me that I cannot see to write in an Evening, without injury to my Eyes. your Aunt Cranch\u2019s sickness has lain heavey at my heart. She is I hope recovering, but she has been much broken down. I have never been more distresst about her. Mrs J Adams has been sick too, almost ever since she came. the Dr calls her complaint, the Water Brush; the pain in her stomack has been intence, and the Water would flow from her mouth in great abundence, whilst her hands and feet would be an Ague cold. Little Abbe has had a slow fever, and been as fractious as a wasp. My daily cares you know: they are not lessned: but the Scripture tells us, that no Man liveth for himself. the sordidness of that Idea, is sufficient to stimulate the indolent, and prompt us all to do good and communicate, that the Sphere of your usefullness may be enlarged. I hope with you that you may return to the Society of your Friends and connections. To me the distance is unpleasent, yet I trust that there are pleasures, and comforts to be found there to a mind disposed to view objects in their best light, and to receive with gratitude the bounties of providence\u2014Johnson in his Rassalass shows us that the happy valley must be in the mind.\nI have just procured Corrinna and am reading it. I will give you my opinion when I have finishd it.\nIf William should think of passing the winter at Philadelphia, I should recommend him to an acquaintance with Dr Rush\u2019s family. Richard Rush is a very fine young Man, and he will find a kind of home in the domestick circle of the Dr\u2014I will write to the Dr in his behalf. his uncle Thomas will give him Letters to some of his Friends. Mrs J Adams thinks he may be of essential service to his Aunt in the care of her affairs, particularly so, if she removes to her Farm as she proposes to do. A single woman whether maiden, or widow, wants some Friend of the other Sex to protect her, and her property or she becomes the prey of every Sharper. William has seen enough of the world, to be\u2014even a Guide to a thoughtless giddy woman, and he may do it in a way, that may convince her, that her honour and reputation are his peculiar care. He is quick sighted, and will easily discern what is proper, at the same time, he will be upon his guard against the contagion of improper example. I have reasons for these hints. He will soon see whether they are well founded. I thought it probable that he might go to Philadelphia, and that he ought not to be improperly associated\u2014Whether Commerce is ever again to shake of her Shackles, as respects America, is doubtfull, not I fear untill she can do it, by the power of her own Navy, and the Thunder of her own Cannon\u2014Brittain is jealous of our prosperity and fears us, as a rival. She is determined to check us in every way which she can France wishes to Embroil us with England, and to crush us in that way, least we should unite our power with hers, against France\u2014Thus are we hemed in on every Side\u2014America is desirious of dealing justly by Both\u2014and extending her commerce as a Nutral Nation, to every part of the Globe. General Moreau compares America to the trunk and limbs of a Giant, with the Muscles of an Infant\u2014Under the present Administration she has certainly totterd and limped, as if affraid to go alone. Last week the report was Current, that Napolean had declared war against the United States\u2014this was not believed by your Father, who could not see any cause, or motive of policy in the measure. His decrees are more provoking than War; we shall soon have the Bugget opend\u2014Mr Madison I think will be our next President\u2014Pinckney is not the Man calculated to ride in the Storm, and stem the torrent. If Mr Madison can, he will perform wonders the people are so divided that it is like a House which cannot stand.\nWe have had one snow storm. I thought you must have had it deep with you. It is all gone, and this day is mild as May. Your Brother and Sister are both well. they kept Sabbeth with us. John went home last week, having been with me four Months,\u2014Sister T B A asks if you received the Letter she wrote you some months since.\u2014I was in Boston last week. our Friends all well\u2014poor Aunt Edwards fell in her Chamber and broke her Arm\u2014regrets it much, as She was to have made her annual visit at Quincey on the same week.\u2014 I Shall write to Caroline next. My Love to her, Caroline was so womanly so , and so pleasing in her manners, that those who come after her, when weighd in the balance are found wanting.\u2014Susan is in a voilent hurry to take the Letter to her uncles. Wait I say untill I send my Regards to all the family uncles Aunts and cousins and to my dear Daughter\u2014The affection of her Mother\nAbigail Adams\nPS I had a Letter from John and have written to him his Grandfather had one this week", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "11-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1688", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Caroline Amelia Smith De Windt, 17 November 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: De Windt, Caroline Amelia Smith\nMy dear Caroline\nQuincy Nov\u2019br. 17th. 1808\nI can scarcly belive that I have not written to my dear Girl for so long a time as two months, yet upon opening her Letter in replie to mine, I find it bears Date 28 Sep\u2019br\nThis Letter I hope will receive a double welcome for it incloses one from your Friend which of them I know not, but it came under cover to your Grandpappa this week. Your Aunt E. Adams has been sick almost ever since she came, which has been a great trouble to me as well as to herself\u2014I hope she is recovering. She is gone with Louisa to Boston to day, the first time Since she came. Susan and Abbe are gone out with Ann Hale to invite company to a party which Ann, is going to have this Evening. I will tell you how the Girls were dissapointed. Ann had invited them for tuesday, but it was a dire Storm. She then appointed the next fair day. wednesday mor\u2019g being dubious, Ann did not Send, but they took it for granted as the Afternoon was fair. She would certainly see them. accordingly, there was a brushing and polishing and Brightning up, and misses got all in prim order, Susan every now & then taking a dancing Step, and Miss Abbe a Stride after her. I sat in my easy chair trying to get a Nap. The chaise was orderd and pray misses, raising up said Grandmamma, had you not better just send down and inquire first if miss Ann expects you\u2014The message went, and the return was, the weather had been so uncertain that the party were not invited. What fools we were Sister not to inquire before we Drest? blank\u2014whose the dupe? Well says miss Susan, I have just been reading the Triumphs of Temper\u2014I think I will try to imitate Serena, and quietly bear the dissapointment\u2014Abbe who is the mere child of imitation, followd the example, and undresst\u2014then took her work, and submitted with a good grace. to day their hopes are all renewed\u2014the pleasure is yet to come\u2014it would be greatly enhanced could you my dear Caroline add to the number, for when a model of ease and Elegance is required, it bears the Name of Caroline Smith\u2014not by the partial Eye, and fond attachment of Grandmamma alone, but through the whole village\u2014United to so modest a demeanor there is not any danger of exciting an improper pride in the Bosom of innocence. pride you know was not made for Man, nor Woman neither. There are persons, there are countanances, there is a deportment, which strike at first sight, and create an interest which it is impossible to account for. it is the great hand of nature which engraves upon the external appearence; the internal spirit and character, Lavator the great physiongnomist has given a Number of Rules for judging of the Character by the countanance\u2014they are more fancifull than just I believe\u2014and much depends upon Education\u2014It is Tom Jones I think who says a good face is a Letter of recommendation.\nYou do well my dear to try to amuse your Mamma and Aunt in their Solitude. they have many cares and anxieties to which you are yet a Stranger; and the innocent playfullness of youth is a Sweet Solace\u2014the comfort of humane Life, is a combination of little minute attentions, which, taken seperately, are nothing, but connected with the circumstances of time place and manner, as comeing from the heart, as tokens of good will possess a value, and inspire a pleasure beyond the possession of gold and Rubies and it will ever be a satisfaction to you, to reflect upon your having contributed to the amusement and comfort of your parents, and the more so now, when they are seperated from most of their Friend and relatives. may you never want either pleasure or amusement. we were made for active Life and idleness and happiness are incompatible.\nYour Aunt T B Adams and her little Girls are very well, and grow finely\u2014our Friends in Boston are well, your Aunt Cranch I hope is recovering\u2014I do not write to your Mamma now\u2014writing to you is the same thing. She will hear from us all\u2014With Love and regards to the whole family I am your truly affection / Grandmother\nA A", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "11-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1689", "content": "Title: From Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to Abigail Smith Adams, 18 November 1808\nFrom: Peabody, Elizabeth Smith Shaw\nTo: Adams, Abigail Smith,Cranch, Mary Smith\nAtkinson November 18th. 1808\nYou my beloved Sisters, whose time is ever filled, with the various duties of Life, can more readily pardon me, for not sooner acquainting you how, & when I got home\u2014Leaving a large family only for a few weeks, makes domestic Cares press hard, & my Boarders Cloatths got very much out of repair, in my absence, & the cold season, & thanksgiving advancing, made new, highly necessary, so that no time could I find for writing, to tell you, that with Abby A Shaw I left Boston, agreeably to my plan, the friday after I saw you, & lodged at Mr Cragies, where I found my Brother Samuel Shaw, & his Son, a Sophomore at College, & was very happy by my Brother, to hear of all my Bridgewater connections. Mr Cragie, was so polite, as to send for S. Gilman, & we had a good social breakfast together\u2014It was then Saturday moring, we had thirty eight miles to ride, before we reached home. & I knew we should have no friendly moon to dispel the gloom, & cheer the benighted Traveller\u2014The Morning was checkered with its variegated coulours, \u201cthe Joyous Sun, look\u2019d out and smil\u2019d,\u201d Yet its radient beams were soon obscured, by thick clouds, which were brought over by a cold cast wind, still, I thought it my duty to proceed on our Journey. But a heavier Cloud hung round my poor Abby\u2019s heart\u2014for, susceptive of tender & grateful sentiments, & feelings, she could not but look back, and contemplate with a sigh, places where she had been received in the most hospitable manner, & treated with parental affection.\u2014We rode about three miles in perfect Silence\u2014when Abby, passing her hankercheif across her face, suddenly exclaimed\u2014\u201cI feel terrible dull to day\u2014I wonder what ails me\u201d\u2014The innocent ebulitions of her heart, made me smile, & I replied, in the words of the song, Alas! poor Child, \u201cWhat, can the matter be?\u201d\u2014\nWe at last reached the Hotel in Reading, when it began to rain, & be very uncomfortable for women, espicially for me, who had no woolen Coat with me\u2014It was in vain for us to criminate ourselves for leaving such kind Friends, who warmly solicited our tarry, the only way I observed, was to hasten on, and find more\u2014In this we were highly favoured, for upon arriving at Madam Phillips\u2019 Mansion, we were welcomed by her, with the smile of affability, & sheltered through the incleminenies of the Weather, & received all the kind assiduities, hospitality, benevolence, & friendship could suggest\u2014We tarried with her till Monday\u2014Perceiving an Heart congenial to my own, we took sweet counsel together, & I found a reluctance at leaving a Woman so amiable\u2014\nAt Night we were happy in reaching our Home, & finding Mr Peabody & all my family in good health, a Blessing for which we cannot be too grateful, as without it, we can taste but little enjoyment\u2014\nThe week after I returned here, I was unexpectly surprized by a visit from Judge Cushing, & Lady. & mortified too, that I, & Abby, were gone to Haverhill that Afternoon\u2014As soon as I returned Mr Peabody told us they were at the Tavern, upon finding us both from home, & not being acquainted with Mr Peabody, he could not persuade them to tarry the Night, but said, they had spoken for a lodging, & must go\u2014We three went immediately over, we could not prevail, only got the promise of their taking breakfast with us in the morning, & they have honoured us with their confidence, in leaving an Nephew of hers, William Bowers, of Connecticut with us, to attend the Academy\u2014They had been attending the Eastern circuit courts, they went on to Boston, & had a fine Day for their Journey\u2014& the youth they have commited to our Care, appears very amiable, & contented\u2014Several of our Boarders are gone, & we shall have to my comfort, less than Ten, through the winter\u2014I want to hear how my Dear Sisters both do, I hope they will excuse my not writing to each now, as I have but a moments leisure\u2014How does Mrs Adams, whom I left upon the bed, and the dear little grand-child\u2014Please to present our best regards to my worthy Brothers, & to the other branches of your families, whatever is proper, from your Sister\nE\u2014 Peabody", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "11-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1691", "content": "Title: From John Adams to Josiah, III Quincy, 25 November 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Quincy, Josiah, III\nMy dear friend\nQuincy 25th: Novr: 1808.\nI owe you a thousand thanks, to speak in the good old English form of civility, for the Speech and the documents. You are greatly to be pitied, I mean all of you, of all parties, for I see you must labour very hard and with much anxiety, without the smallest hope, that I can discern of preserving yourselves and us the people from very dull times. If you continue the Embargo the times will be hard. If you institute a total non-intercourse the times will not be more cheerful. If you repeal the Embargo, circumstances will occur of more animation, but perhaps not more profit or more comfort. If you arm our merchantmen that will be war. The blood will not stagnate it is true; but it may run too freely for our health or comfort. If you declare war against France and England at once, this will be sublime, to be sure, and if we had a Dutch Navy, and a Van Tromp to sail up the Thames and a De Ruiter to sail up the Seine, we might gain as much by it as the Dutch did, when they warred against England France and Spain at once; that is we might obtain by it much wealth and a good peace. I have made up my mind for hard, dull times in all events. I reconcile myself to my our destiny as well as I can, by considering that we are yet in a much better situation than any other Nation and that we cannot probably be in a worse whatever may happen.\nI have another resource too for reconciling myself to our fate and that is by running over again the history of the world.\nI have just finished Voltaire\u2019s manners and spirit of Nations, which is a miniature of Universal history. When I find that this globe has been a vast theatre on which the same tragedies and Comedies have been acted over and over again in all ages and Countries how can I hope that our Country should escape the universal calamity. Despair itself hardens if it does not comfort. One would think that the consideration that all other Nations, allways have been and now are more miserable than we are, should make one more unhappy, but it has not that effect. It alleviates in some degree our distress; when we see that an evil or a danger is inevitable we resolve or prepare to meet it.\nAn acquaintance of your\u2019s, Mrs: Price, Mrs: T Greenleaf\u2019s Mother died this Afternoon very suddenly. Last Evening, she was preparing to go abroad upon a tea party. Mrs: A\u2013 presents her compliments and thanks for the documents, which she takes a satisfaction in reading, because they are well printed and save her eyes from the torment of reading the newspapers\u2014\nWith great and sincere esteem I am dear Sir your obliged Servt", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-03-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1692", "content": "Title: From Abigal Adams Shaw Felt to Mary Smith Cranch, 3 December 1808\nFrom: Felt, Abigal Adams Shaw\nTo: Cranch, Mary Smith\nAtkinson December 3 1808\nYour letter my dear Aunt, to my Mother, afforded me great pleasure. I was rejoiced to hear you had so far recovered your health, as to enable you to attend once more the daily avocations of your family You were fearfull my health would suffer by my confinement with you, but I asure my dear Aunt, I did not consider it a confinement in the least, and were I so happy as to have been of any service, or alleviate a moments pain, to me, it would ever be a source of the highest satisfaction\u2014\nI spent a few days in Boston, very pleasantly, and the Friday after I left you, we went to Cambridge, and passed the night with Mrs Craigie, and the next morning commenced our journey for Atkinson, but the day was extremly disagreeable the sky was oercast with clouds, and soon after we left the Hotell in Reading, the rain decended very plentifully, and we were obliged to ride nine miles, before we could meet with any shelter. We reached Madam Phillipses in Andover, about two oclock in the afternoon, and were received by her with every mark of hospitality\u2014We tarried there untill monday, when we once more renewed our journey, and arrived safely home found all well, and rejoiced to see us. I was grieved to hear of Thomas\u2019s illness, his constitution I believe is not very firm, but I hope long before this, his health is perfectly reestablished. I was delighted to hear Richard had so pleasant a journey to Washington. when the Judge is so far distant from his relations, what a consolation it must be to him, to have so worthy a son, of a beloved Sister to reside with him, and take the charge of instructing his rising Progeny\u2014\nHow does my dear Uncle do? I hope he has not been so much troubled afflicted with that troublesome humour, as when I was with you. Please to tender my most affectionate regards to him, and to my Uncle and Aunt Adams\u2014Love to Ruthy, Thomas, and Elisabeth, and, with wishing that you my dear Aunt, may enjoy the choicest of Heavens Blessings I subscribe myself, your affectionate, and / obliged\nNiece", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1693", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Abigail Amelia Adams Smith, 8 December 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, Abigail Amelia Adams\nMy dear Daughter\nQuincy December 8th. 1808\nI am indebted to you for two Letters one of the last bearing date Novbr 20th. & 24th. I am always rejoiced to see your handwriting, altho the contents of your Letters some times give me pain, and none more so than those which contain an Idea that your Relatives, and Friends have not exerted themselves for you as they might have done. With respect to william. Your Father himself went to Town: and advised with some of his commercial acquaintance, who oweing to the total supression of Commerce did not like to take any young Gentleman into their stores\u2014most of those who had any Number were obliged to dissmiss them. Dr Welchs youngest Son John returnd home, and he sent him to an accademy to keep him out of Idleness. Mr Greenleafs son Price is returnd home. Capt. Beals two son, are here intirely out of Buisness. The Shop keepers have buisness for a time, but that is like to come soon to a close by the nonintercourse Bill which has recently past in congress\u2014So that the youth of our country have not any other resourse, but to till the land for Bread to Eat. This state of things cannot last long. We are wrought up to a crissis which must break forth in vengence some where or other. Heaven preserve our Country underserving as it is of the favour and protection of Providence. Parson E told his congregation that we were suffering the judgments of Heaven for having chosen an infidel president to rule over us. We as a people have crying sins enough beside to draw down the punishments we feel. Let each individual look into his own breast, and root out every evil and Corrupt propencity. Then may we expect to be a people Saved of the Lord.\nI am much grieved at the misfortune of your Brother. a more generous benevolent Heart exists not in Man. the Season of the year is in his favour, and I hope he will be spaired to his family and Friends. in the midst of Life we are in Death. We have had a recent instance of this in the late Death of Mrs. Price, the Mother of Mrs Greenleaf\u2014invited to a tea party, well and vigorus as age can be, She declined only on account of the late hours of Return, rose from her chair was seizd with an oppression upon her lungs, went to her Bed, and expired the next day, to the inexpressible Grief of her distresst and afflicted daughter. by painfull experience I know how afflictive the Death of Parents is\u2014at a period when their Lives are usefull instructive and pleasent, the Source of our own Life seems dried up, our best Friends and counselors removed. Yet this is the order of Nature, and we who are yet living must soon expect to follow our Aged Friend.\u2014 Our old Friend Genll. Warren is also numberd with the great congregation. he was very infirm, and Aged\u201484 I think. I felt as tho former Friendship demanded from me a Sympathizing Letter, and requested that the bitterness of party Spirit had severd us, but after the injustice she had done your Fathers Character in her History, and the opportunity he had given her of making some acknowledgment for it, which she wholy omitted to do. I thought a Letter of the kind would appear insincere, and altho I feel for her berevement, and know how keenly she must feel it, I have declined writing to her.\nWe are all in pretty good Health at present. Mrs. S Adams is much better. My dear sister Cranch is recoverd in some measure, but I can see that her whole frame is Shaken, and that she is failing\u2014Your Brothers family in Boston are well except John who I think in a very critical state of Health. he has many Hetick Symptoms. They all kept thanksgiving with us, your uncle and Aunt Cranch & Sister Smith\u2014all of whom desired to be affectionatly rememberd to you. we calld you all to mind, and found our party incompleat. Last year you were with us. Susan desires me to present her Duty to you, and to say to you, that she was at Atkinson when her Mother arrived here; and did not know it for a week, when be sure she was anxious enough to return, but was obliged to wait an other week for her Aunt Peabody\u2014T B A and his Mil desire to be kindly rememberd to you. All our domesticks remember you and yours with Love and affection\u2014I was yesterday at Weymouth\u2014our Friends there were well\u2014We tallk of you\u2014I expect Aunt Edwards tomorrow to make her Annual visit\u2014She fell and broke her Arm in October, when she intended to come\u2014I expected she would give up the Idea of her visit, but she sent me word her Arm was well, and she must come and kiss the President\u2014\nYours affecly,\nA Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-14-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1694", "content": "Title: From John Adams to John Adams Smith, 14 December 1808\nFrom: Adams, John\nTo: Smith, John Adams\nDecember 14th. 1808.\nIt is a long time since I had a Letter from you. In the last I think you prophesied \u201cWonders in November.\u201d I understood you to mean, a wonderful revolution in the sentiments of the people, and a restoration of the Federalists to the Government of the Nation. But the month of November is past, and there appears, notwithstanding all the terrors and horrors of the Embargo a wonderfull adherence of the people to that measure, and its projectors and abettors. Pray tell me what wonders you meant, and whether they have appeared or not?\nThere is one wonder much lamented, as I hear, and much celebrated far and wide in the Nation: and that is, that your G\u2014\u2014 F\u2014\u2014 has changed his politicks; has come quite round; has altered his System; has become a Democrat\u2014a Jacobin\u2014a disorganizer; a Republican, a turn-coat, an Apostate &c. &c. &c.\nThis is an imaginary wonder indeed.\u2014Chimerical as it is, the very report is a wonderfull, wonder of wonders, as ever this wondering world wondered at.\nWhen the Sun remains fixed in the center of the System, or at least revolving round it in its own appropriate Circle, it appears to the Savages of Africa and America; and to the ignorant vulgar of all Civilized nations, to revolve, daily, round the center of the Earth; when, in truth, these Stupid Starers themselves revolve daily round the Earth center of the Earth. Or, to descend, in the true spirit of the Bathos, from the heavens to the earth. When I sailed up the Garonne on the first of April 1778. before a gale of wind and a rapid tide, the Trees and houses on each side the river, appeared to run from me down the stream, as fast as a horse could gallop or a bird fly. But in reality it was myself who ran from them up the river, and the trees and houses were stationary.\nIt is your who has been steady to his System and the pretended Federalists, who have fled from it.\nMy System for four and thirty years has been Neutrality among the nations of Europe, as long as possible. But when no longer possible, to war with the aggressor. When two aggressors at once render peace untenable, to War with both, or at least with the worst\u2014\nMy principle has been to support a National government; national honour; national Union and national Independence. The hyper-federalists are for hazarding all. It is my opinion and has been so, ever since our Independence, and will be so for a long time to come, that the English are our natural enemies. To be sure Alliances are sometimes made from necessity, some-times through folly, and some times by the intrigues and private views of Princes or other individuals or parties, between natural enemies. But I will certainly never consent to an Alliance with England but in the last extremity of necessity. Some of the leading Federalists are driving at an alliance with England, and at other points in which course I will not follow them, at least until they get the legal government. They broke away from me when upon these principles I made a peace with France in 1800. They have been flying from me, ever since that time, as fast as I sailed from the Trees in my voyage to Bordeaux. And now the Jackanapes charge me with flying from them. How are the proceedings of Congress received at NewYork?\nJ. A.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-14-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1695", "content": "Title: To John Adams from Josiah, III Quincy, 14 December 1808\nFrom: Quincy, Josiah, III\nTo: Adams, John\nDear Sir\nWashington. 14 Dec. 1808.\nYour favour of the 25th: found me, in the midst of parliamentary contest, which occupied me too intensely to admit of that early acknowledgment, which a deep sense of the honour, you have conferred on me, dictated. The battle has raged, with some warmth; and it has been my fate, to be in the hottest of it. Whether my exertions were as wise, as, I am sure, they were, well intended, I confess, I am ignorant. I had, almost, said, indifferent. That the country cannot remain in the state, in which it is, I was certain. That it was the determination of administration to adhere, pertinaciously, to the Embargo, I was equally, certain. That they, and their majority were, in a good measure, ignorant of the real temper and sufferings of our people, I knew. My object has been, as far as possible, to shake their confidence, in that system, which, whatever they believed, or intended, I was conscious was ruining the best hopes of New England. With respect to subsequent measures, in case the Embargo was removed, there are, indeed considerable difficulties; growing, however, more out of the character and policy of the men, who guide our affairs, than from anything, unexampled, in the embarassments of the nation. A policy, not unlike that of 1798, with some variation, in the details, resulting out of particular differences, in our situation, would yet preserve us, not only, in peace, but, as I believe, in the enjoyment of a rich harvest of neutrality. But how can such \u201ca dish of skim milk,\u201d as now stands, curdling, at the head of our nation, be stirred to so mighty an action, as that, which he, who, then led the destinies of our country, effected? Fear of responsibility and love of popularity are, now, master passions, and regulate all the movements. The policy is to keep things as they are, and wait for European events. It is hoped that the chapter of accidents may present something favourable, within the remaining three months. And if it does not, no great convulsion can happen during that period. The presidential term will have expired. Then away to Monticello,\u2014and let the\u2014\u2014\u2014take the hindmost.\nI do believe, that not a whit deeper project than this fills the august mind of your successor.\nWhether the definite project be to put an end to mercantile enterprise, and to make us abandon the water, I confess, I am ignorant. The intention is denied. Yet all the talents of the friends of administration are put in requisition to convince us of the dreadful consequences, to our property & rights\n\u2014si tamen impia\nNon tangenda rates transiliunt vada.\u2014\nHow all these things will terminate, indeed, I know not. But of one thing, I am certain, that happen what will, I can never cease to feel and express, the perfect honour and sincere respect with which I am your very hb\u2019 Sevt \nJosiah QuincyI beg respectfully to be presented to your lady\u2014son & family.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1697", "content": "Title: From Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to Abigail Smith Adams, 24 December 1808\nFrom: Peabody, Elizabeth Smith Shaw\nTo: Adams, Abigail Smith\nMy Dear Sister\nAtkinson Dec. 24th. 1808\nI had anticipated a visit from Mrs Adams, & both her Children, for a few days at least, when she came to Haverhill, & we regretted very much that it was not in our power to send for them, or to visit her while there\u2014Abby, & I, both went down a monday, and had the mortification to find she went to Boston the Saturday before\u2014Mr Peabody was absent the whole of your Thansgiving week, & I could not go from home. The Trustees of Atkinson Academy requested Mr. Peabody, to go to Concord, & proffer a Pettition in new Hampshire Court, soliciting Lands, to be appropriated as a Fund for this Seminary\u2014I think it is doubtful, whether he succeeds with such an antifederal Court, who have implicitly adopted the \u0152conomical, pusulanimous System of their Master; though it has many claims upon Equity, Generosity, & justice; yet where wisdom, & Candour does not preside, & party spirit rages, Institutions of Learning can have but little prospect of relief, or liberal Benefactions\nI could not but regret that my Time in Boston was so limited, that I could not call at your Sons House, & upon many other Friends, whom I wished to see\u2014It really grieved me that I could not see our dear little George, I was in hopes his Parents would have told him to come, & seen me, though I could not visit them\u2014\nYes, my dear Sister, I do indeed rejoice with you, that you have a Son, of whom you have reason to be gratefully proud\u2014His high sense of moral Obligations, his Virtue, his Talents, all give him a superior rank, in the estimation of the candid, the wise, & the good\u2014& the parental breast cannot but glow with peculiar pleasure, when is rehearsed, the \u201cwisdom, the virtue, & prosperity, of a beloved Child\u201d\u2014That I can claim some share of this pure, & perfect Bliss, I count among my greatest Blessings\u2014\n\u201cO! speak the Joy, Ye whom the sudden tear suprizes Oft\u201d\u2014\nI presume the time will come, when truth shall prevail\u2014& things shall not be viewed through the false medium, which now obscures their sight\u2014And though the tongue of slander, may reproach Mr J. Q. Adams, supposing him to have been actuated by sinister motives, yet those who know him best, cannot believe, but, that his conduct was the result of his best informed Judgment, & a high sense of the duties he owed his Country, though we may regret, that it is \u201chuman to Err,\u201d & that the best, are not exempt\u2014\nWhen Virtue, & political Knowledge are Talents so much wanted to prop the falling States, we lament that his, should retire from publick life, & move in a lesser Sphere. If wisdom, and Virtue, are the stability of a Nation, into what a Situation are we now plunged, for how little do we see in the present Administration\u2014Heaven grant, the next Congress, may exhibit more wisdom\u2014\nIt was so lately that we visited your Neighbour Mrs Price, in Quincy, & saw her happy in her Children, smiling in health, & surrounded with the elegancies & comforts of Life, that to hear of her sudden departure, was to me very surprizing. Yet what avails riches, honours, or any sublinary Enjoyment at the hour of Death\u2014they must be less than nothing, at that all-important period\u2014Happy, if we have learned, e\u2019en now, \u201cto relish, what alone subsists hereafter\u2014\u201d\nI know Mrs Nancy Adams will rejoice to hear that Haverhill has at last united in the Settlement of Mr Joshua Dodge\u2014a worthy Man, & I hope, will prove a lasting Blessing\u2014Mr. Harrod, I suppose has informed his Daughter, of the particulars relative to the Ordination\u2014Entertanments &ccc\u2014\nAbby\u2019s regrets many indeed, I dare say were, that she had left her worthy, kind friends at Quincy, & could no longer enjoy the Instructive circle, she always found in her Venerable Uncles hospitable mansions\u2014\u201cWhat dear Mamma, said she, did you write to my Aunts? now\u2014what will they think\u2014I am sure it was nothing\u2014the cloudy weather\u201d\u2014Peace Child\u2014what need you be concerned\u2014I only related a simple circumstance, & I trust such, will never dishonour you\u2014\nI am rejoiced to find our dear Sister Cranch is better, & that she has been able to use her Eyes for the benefit of her absent Friends\u2014I was delighted to receive a letter from her.\nI am pleased to hear that Mrs. Charles Adams has recovered her health\u2014Please to present my kind regards to her, & her Daughters. I hope they will rapidly improve under her correct, & maternal Guidance\nWith sincerest wishes for your health, & the happiness of all your family, I am ever, your affectionate Sister\nElizabeth PeabodyPS Mr Peabody, and Abby desire their best regards may be accepted by the President.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "12-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1698", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to Abigail Amelia Adams Smith, 28 December 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, Abigail Amelia Adams\nMy dear Daughter\nQuincy December 28 1808\nWhat is the reason I do not get a Letter from my Mother I think I hear you say? Why I will tell you Child. I have Sat down more than once, got through one page, been interrupted, laid it by\u2014untill it seemd of no value. I love to be by myself when I write and that is a difficult thing in the winter season. the parlour your Father occupies all the forenoon in reading or writing. it is proper he should have it to himself. my own chamber is compleatly full this winter, and I know not how to write in the Evening, so that I can only snatch a few moments at a time, and then with various interruptions. Since I began these few lines I have been twice calld away. Susan and Abbe are gone to Boston to day, in order to go to the play in the Evening. Louissa has been there this week, little Abbe is sick, and Eliza is confined to the chamber, so that I am more still than usual. I improved the forenoon in writing a Letter to John and this afternoon I was detemined to write to you. mrs C Adams has been writing in my chamber to Norfolk\u2014from whence she had a Letter yesterday\u2014a correspondence is kept up, but whether more than mere Friendship is meant, or rather whether any connection will ever take place is very uncertain; I wish she was well setled in Life, but without good prospects, she is better as she is\u2014Susan and Abbe are two overgrown Girls, both of them require a carefull attention & vigilenc Susan with all her foibles bids fair to make a valuable woman if directed and duly imprest with a proper sense of her Duty, she becomes properly attentive to them\u2014I hope they will both make good women\u2014as yet they have not attaind to many of the graces particuliarly Abbe, who I really think an uncouth child in her behaviour. She is milder in her temper, and less usurping than Susan but not half the intelect. I begin to think Grand parents not so well qualified to Educate Grandchildren as Parents. they are apt to relax in their Spirit of Government, and to be too indulgent. yet that was not the case with my Grandmother whose memory I cherish with holy veneration whose maxims I have treasured up, whose virtues live in my memory\u2014happy if I could say, they have been transplanted into my Life\u2014\nHow has the winter been with you. we have not had scarcly any snow, and but little cold weather. we have been sadly cut off with our cider\u2014we made only 4 barrels this year, and scarcly a Bushel of winter apples\u2014\nOur Friends here are all well\u2014your Aunt Cranch is better, but by no means the woman she has been I am affraid she has received a shock which she will never recover\nMy pen does not incline to run a race. tell Caroline I will write soon to her, and to William give my Love\u2014his Grandfather has written to him lately and I sent on a Letter from Harriot Welch to you\u2014I intended to have coverd it to you, but your Father saw it, and franked it\u2014tell Caroline not to prevent her Friends sending her Letters here if she is willing to wait a little longer for them\u2014 your Brother Johns children have all been Sick, but are getting better. he is going to Washington to the Supreeme Court, in a cause of considerable importance\u2014he expects to leave here in about three weeks\u2014and to be absent about six weeks\u2014\nI shall not touch upon politicks now, but reserve them for the subject of an other Letter from / Your affectionate Mother\nA Adams", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-18-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Adams/99-03-02-1700", "content": "Title: From Abigail Smith Adams to John Adams Smith, 1808\nFrom: Adams, Abigail Smith\nTo: Smith, John Adams\nDear John\nI always feel most disposed to write when I have just received a Letter. Yet that is not the case now, but what is very similar to it. I have just read one from you to your Grandfather in which you mention Judge Bensons having commenced a course of Law Lectures and express a wonder at what could be his object as he does not receive any pecuniary reward. From the knowledge I have of Judge Benson and his Character, I should not hesitate to say that his object is the benefit and instruction of those Youths, who are more eager to obtain knowledge, than to pursue pleasure. of that number I believe my dear Grandson to be. Rollin tell us that it was the a custom observed among the Romans to make the houses of old Lawyers the School of the Youth designed for the Bar. What can be more worthy a Great orator than, to conclude the glorious course of his pleading by so honorable a function, like an old experienced pilot to point out to the young Students the course they are to steer and the Rocks they must shun. Such I presume are the motives and views of Judge Benson.\nAs a few days since I was reading upon this subject, it may not be unacceptable to you to receive a few of the Hints for the rule of your conduct. The first and principle thing, is to form a Grand Idea of your profession. It is a profession which qualifies a Man best for the chief employments of the State. What esteem does it not gain those who distinguish themselves in it, either in pleading or giving counsel. Is there any finer sight, than to see a numerous auditory, attentive, immoveable, and as it were hanging upon the Lips of a pleader, who manages speech common to all with so much art that he charmes and ravishes the minds of his hearers, and makes himself absolute master over them. But beside this Glory which would be Trifling enough were there no other motive, what solid glory joy is it for a virtuous man to think he has received a talent from God, which makes him the Sanctuary of the unfortunate, the protector of Justice: and enables him to defend the lives, fortunes, and honours of his Brethren? I am convinced that a Genius is the first and most necessary quality for a pleader but I am also certain that study is of the utmost importance. Tis like a second nature, and if it does not impart a Genius to him who had none before, it rectifies, polishes, improves and invigorates it\u2014These are the observations of Rollin. I have heard your Uncle J Q Adams observe, that most of our public speakers both in our National Legislature, and at the Bar, are very deficient in point of Literature. It is polite Literature which embellishes and enriches the understanding, which diffuses a delicacy and beauty over discourse, and imparts a \u201ccharm beyond the reach of art.\u201d To imbibe Rhetoric from the very fountain, to consult able masters, to read carefully the ancient and moderns, to be constantly employd in composing and translating and to make the Greek language a particular study.\u2014these were the exercises which Cicero thought necessary to form the great orator. It is reported of Demosthenes that he coppied Thucydides\u2019s history eight times with his own hand, in order to make his Stile more familiar to him. What ever you undertake my dear Son strive to excell in: I am glad to see your mind so much engaged in the pursuit of knowledge. It is a young Mans best security against temptation, and dissipation.\nI had a Letter last week from your Sister Caroline. She is well and assures us that your uncle is upon the recovery. We are all in good health at present. It is probable you will see your uncle J. Q. Adams in about three weeks he is going to Washington to the Supreme Court in a cause of consideral concequence\u2014I shall leave politicks at present to the Statesmen, recommending however to you to: read all the debates and speeches you can procure upon both sides of the Great Subjects, which now agitate and embarrass our Country.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2496", "content": "Title: From James Madison to United States Congress, 1 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: United States Congress\nDept. of State, January 1. 1808.\nIn pursuance of the Act of Congress entitled \"An act to regulate and fix the compensation of Clerks &c. the Secretary of State, has the honor to submit to Congress the annexed list of persons employed in his office, during the Year 1807, and to report that the business of the Department generally is in a state of progressive increase: hence it has been found impracticable to bestow that prompt & regular attention to the issuing patents for Lands which is desirable, especially at a period of peculiar increase in the business growing out of our foreign relations. Some contemplated changes too in the mode of conducting the business of the Office will for a time increase the labour of it. It is his opinion therefore that the public service would be promoted, as stated in the last report to Congress, by a provision, at least sufficient for the employment of another Clerk. All which is respectfully submitted.\nJames Madison.\nList of persons employed as Clerks in the Dept. of State in the year 1807, with the Salary of each annexed.\nJacob Wagner, Chief Clerk for the 1st. quarterDolls.at 2000 dollars\u2014\u2014succeeded by\u2014\u2014500John Graham, the 1 July, is 2 quarters1000Stephen Pleasonton\u2014\u20141000Daniel Brent\u2014\u20141000Bernard Smith\u2014\u2014900Richard Forrest\u2014\u2014900Christopher Thom, for 2 qrs., succeeded by, Josias W. King, Do.\u2014\u2014900Patents & Copy Rights.For services rendered by Dr. Thornton, in superintending & issuing Patents for useful inventions & discoveries, and in securing copy rights, a Salary has been allowed him of 1400 Dollars.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2497", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Gavino, 1 January 1808\nFrom: Gavino, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nGibraltar 1st: January 1808\nI beg leave to referr to what I had the honour of adressing you pr No: 48 on the 29: Ulto: which being kept back for want of a fair wind, will now go with this. Since then a Number of our Merchant Vessels have put into this Port, some on account the Communication made by British Ships of Warr that Algiers were Capturing our Trade; this would have been stopd before now had we had an Easterly wind as I imediately wrote Admiral Purvise of our differences with that Regency being Settled. Others put in on account the warning given them by the British Ships of Warr in Conformity to His Brit: Majys: order in Council of the 11: November last, how soon they can be furnished with the required Certificate, and Extend their Protests will proceed.\nWe have had a severe Gale of Wind from S.W. Yesterday at Night when the Schooner Atalanta of Duxbury, Silvanus Smith Master in Ballast from Bristol for Alicante went on shore under the Walls. The Crew is saved. I have the honour to be with respect, Sir Your obedt: and huml. servt.\nJohn Gavino", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2500", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Augustus Woodward, 1 January 1808\nFrom: Woodward, Augustus\nTo: Madison, James\nRiver Raisin, jan. 1. 1808.\nI have this day seen number sixteen of the Essays on the Evils which have proved fatal to republics, published in Pittsburgh. I repeat an assurance heretofore given, and I believe with unqualified latitude, that I have no knowledge of, and no personal concern, even to the smalles. extent, in any species of speculation whatsoever, in this Territory, or elsewhere. It may for a moment be supposed that I ought here to make an exception relative to the Bank of Detroit. I will lay open to public view the whole of that transaction; including all the other important points which have been noticed. I this day transmit for that purpose a publication for the same press, which I presume will reach the general government, if that which produces it has reached it. I cannot now be too prompt in executing what I have long considered an indispensible duty. I believe it will be useful to the government to possess itself of the facts; and as they go before the public, I will say nothing further on the subject through a private channel.\nThe country is perfectly tranquil. The Indians have some time since given a definitive answer to the British Government that in case of hostilities between them and the Americans they will not interfere.\nI am sorry to see troops called into service here from the walks of civil life. I consider it a useless expence, and as having a tendency to make trouble, rather than to prevent it. Permit me to subjoin my respect\nA. B. Woodward", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-02-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2502", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Fulwar Skipwith, 2 January 1808\nFrom: Skipwith, Fulwar\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nParis, 2d. Jany 1808\nAnnexed hereto is a copy of my letter to Genl. Armstrong, and also a copy of a letter from Mr. Leveux, the deputy Commercial Agent of the United States at Calais, on the subject of the American Ship the Brothers, Capt Fisk, bound from Virginia to London with a Cargo of Tobacco, which has been just captured by a French privateer & brought into the harbour of Calais. I have the honor to be with respectful consideration Sir Your Mo. Ob. Servt.\nFulwar Skipwith", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-02-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2503", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Larkin Smith, 2 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Smith, Larkin\nSir.\nDepartment of State, January 2d. 1808.\nIt appearing by communications just made by Mr: Erskine that some unexpected difficulties have arisen in the case of His Britannic Majesty\u2019s Ship the Statira, in which an Envoy Extraordinary to the United States has just arrived in Hampton Roads, you are hereby instructed to consider the said Ship as within the exception made by the President\u2019s Proclamation of July last, and to admit her to whatever privileges & hospitalities would have been allowed to National Ships previous to the Proclamation, and without subjecting her to any of the regulations which have since been imposed on armed Vessels. You will also extend to Mr. Rose and his suite all the attentions and facilities due to his public character.\nI am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-02-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2504", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Leonard, 2 January 1808\nFrom: Leonard, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nBarcelona 2d. Jany. 1808\nHerewith I have the honor to hand your Excy. Copy of a Letter this day received from Consul Genl. Lear at Algiers. I have the honor to be Sir, very respectfully Your very obt. Svt.\nJ Leonard\nI take the liberty of enclosing your Excly. Copy of a Letter recd. of a Banking house in this City & my Letter concerning it to Mr Erving.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-02-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2505", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 2 January 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nI have the Honor to enclose an English Newspaper containing the French Decree of Decr. 17. at Milan, and this Evening\u2019s \"Political Register. The former will be found interesting. I have the Honor to be with sincere Attachment Dear Sir, Your most Obt. Humble Serv:\nWm: Pinkney", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-02-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2506", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Louis-Marie Turreau de Garambouville, 2 January 1808\nFrom: Turreau de Garambouville, Louis-Marie\nTo: Madison, James\nMonsieur,\nA Washington le 2 Janvier 1808.\nJai re\u00e7u la lettre que vous m\u2019avez fait l\u2019honneur de m\u2019\u00e9crire le 30 du mois dernier, relativement \u00e0 l\u2019offre faite par le Gouvernement F\u00e9d\u00e9ral \u00e0 la L\u00e9gation Fran\u00e7aise de laisser \u00e0 Sa disposition deux B\u00e2timents n\u2019excedant pas le port de 100. Tonneaux chacune pour faciliter Ses rapports avec La France & les Colonies qui lui appartiennent.\nJe Suis tr\u00e8s Sensible, Monsieur, \u00e0 ce nouveau t\u00e9moignage que donne Votre Gouvernement du desir qu\u2019il conserve de maintenir par tous les moyens que permettent les circonstances, les relations de bonne Amiti\u00e9 qui existent entre les Etats- Unis & La France, L\u2019Empereur & Roi, mon Ma\u00eetre, S\u2019est toujours montr\u00e9 jaloux d\u2019assurer l\u2019independance malgr\u00e9 les longs & Sanglants d\u00e9bats de l\u2019Europe. Agr\u00e9ez, Monsieur, un nouvel hommage de ma haute Consid\u00e9ration.\nTurreau", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-03-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2507", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Leander Cathcart, 3 January 1808\nFrom: Cathcart, James Leander\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nMadeira Jany. 3d: 1808.\nBy the Brig Apollo Capt Goldsbury who sail\u2019d on the 24th: Ulto. I had only time to inform you that Sir Saml. Hood with four Sail of the Line, five Frigates & a number of Transports with General Berresford & four thousand Troops on board had just anchor\u2019d within two Cables length of the fortifications of this City Some of whom had already dropped their Stern Anchors & had springs upon their Cables flat bottom\u2019d Boats out & apparently making every preparation to land their Troops in case of resistance. Three British officers had come on Shore & were at that moment at the Governor\u2019s who had called a Council of War, and as the London, ninety, one of the Ships that accompanied the Prince of Brazils from Lisbon, touched here on the 11th: Ulto: gave us information of his having abdicated the Throne of his Ancestors, it is the general opinion that no hostilities will take place, that the Troops would be landed & be permitted to take possession of the Fortifications of the Island, but whether the British intended holding the Island in deposit for the Crown of Portugal or convert it into a British Colony was not then known. I confirm the contents of the preceeding & have the honour to inform you that this Island was taken possession of by the British with the greatest tranquility & good order & that on the 1st: of January 1808 the Council & heads of departments took an oath of allegiance to His Britannic Majesty. Enclosed is a Copy of the Capitulation.\nThe Squadron still remains here & has not landed above two Thousand Troops. The remainder it is Supposed are destined to take possession of the Western Islands or Azores. This Port has been embargoed ever Since the arrival of the British Forces but the Apollo was blown off in a gale of Wind Consequently if she arrives in any regular time you will have early information of the Changes which have taken place in this Island. This moment I have received the enclosed from the Governors Secretary, which with my answer I transmit for your information. I request you Sir to have the goodness to order a new Commission to be Sent to me as Soon as possible & that a duplicate thereof may be Sent to our Minister at London in order that my Exequator may be expedited as Soon as possible. I have the honour to continue with the most respectful Esteem Sir Your obedt: Servant\nJames Leander Cathcart", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-03-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2508", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Thomas Jefferson, 3 January 1808\nFrom: Jefferson, Thomas\nTo: Madison, James\nSunday Jan. 3. 08.Th: J. to J. M.\nI think we were under impressions last night which the papers did not justify. No single act was specified as a cause of complaint. No obstacle was stated to have been opposed to Mr. Rose\u2019s landing & coming on. What we did, was well, but I doubt the expediency of sending a vessel. It might shew too much empressement to gratify punctilios not explained to us. These thoughts are merely for consideration. Affectionate salutations.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2511", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Joseph Rademaker, 4 January 1808\nFrom: Rademaker, Joseph\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nPhiladelphia 4th. January 1808.\nI have to acknowledge the receipt of Your note of 30th. December, proposing that in case I should desire to convey intelligence to my Court by vessels specially engaged for that purpose, the Secretary of the Treasury should Cause the proper clearances to be granted for two Vessels, under certain specified regulations.\nI have the honor, Sir, to express my obligation for the disposition on the part of the President of the United States to prevent so far, the inconveniences resulting from the late act of Congress laying an Embargo: I may probably, Sir, find it necessary to profit of it hereafter, but shall not trouble the Secretary of the Treasury on the occasion at present, having within a few days past availed myself of the opportunity of transmitting my Dispatches by the British Packet. I have the honor to be, With great respect, Sir, Your most Obedt. Servt.\nJoseph Rademaker.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2512", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Tobias Lear, 4 January 1808\nFrom: Lear, Tobias\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nAlgiers, January 4 1808\nThe Courier, for Alicante having been detained two days longer than was expected, gives me an opportunity of adding these few lines to my dispatches herewith (which are covered to Mr. Montgomery Consul in Alicante, with a request to forward them by the first opportunity); and to say, that it is reported this day, that the French Consul is in a fair way to settle the differences between his Government and this Regency (which is the cause of the detention of the Courier); but I confess I cannot give credit to it in full; for they are of too serious a nature to be soon adjusted; and such concessions will be required here, as nothing but the most desperate situation could induce them to make. It is true, that the French Consul has been at the Palace for two days past, which he has not been permitted to enter before for more than Six Months; and at his last attempt to visit, he was refused admittance in the most abrupt and uncivil manner.\nShould a reconciliation take place between France and the Regency; there will probably be a difference with the other Great Power.\nI forgot to mention, in my letter of the 31. ultimo, what I presume you must often have heard before; vizt. that it is indelibly impressed on these people; as well as all of the other Regencies; that we are restrained by our Treaty with G. Britain, of 1783, from building any Ships of the line. This is naturally encouraged by Englishmen; and so general has been the beleif in this Sea, that I have met several of our Countrymen, who had the same impression. And I am convinced that the appearance of one Ship of the Line of the U. States in this Sea, would have a better effect, for us, with these Powers, than twenty Frigates. For they well know our ability to build, man and fight those Vessels; but they most sincerely beleive that we are restrained from exercising that ability. Accept the assurances of high Respect and most sincere Attachment with which I have the honor to be, Sir, Your most faithful & most Obdt. Servt.\nTobias Lear\nP. S I must repeat that the only real security we can have in this Sea is a Naval force especially now.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2513", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Peder Pedersen, 4 January 1808\nFrom: Pedersen, Peder\nTo: Madison, James\nMonsieur,\n\u00e0 Philadelphie le 4. Janvier 1808.\nJ\u2019ai eu l\u2019honneur de re\u00e7evoir Votre lettre du 30 de Decembr. derr. et quoique probablement je ne serai pas dans le cas de pouvoir profiter de la permission-y-donn\u00e9e pour exp\u00e9dier un ou deux batiments en lest, fretes expr\u00e8ssement pour transmettre la Correspondence accoutum\u00e9e, dont la voie ordinaire se trouve an\u00e9antie par la mesure derni\u00e8rement prise par le Congr\u00e8s en mettant en embargo tous les vaisseaux marchands; j\u2019ai n\u00e9anmoins \u00e0 Vous offrir Monsieur mes remerciments de l\u2019attention que Vous avez bien voul\u00fb porter \u00e0 ce sujet, et je Vous prie de vouloir bien agr\u00e9er l\u2019hommage du sentiment respectueux, avec lequel j\u2019ai l\u2019honneur d\u2019\u00eatre, Monsieur Votre tr\u00e8s-humble et tr\u00e8s-obeissant Serviteur\nPr: Pedersen", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2514", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James McGreggar, 4 January 1808\nFrom: McGreggar, James\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nSt. Thomas January 4-6, 1808\nEnclosed are Returns of the American Vessels which arrived here from the 22d. Septr. to the 21st. December, at which time this Island surrendered to the Forces of His Britannic Majesty by Capitulation, a Copy whereof is also enclosed. I have likewise sent the Registers of Vessels, deposited in my Office, which have been sold or condemned as unfit for sea, together with sundry Sea Letters found in the Custom House, and given to me by the Danish Collector, previous to the surrender of the Island, also a Copy of a Letter from the American Seamen on board the Brig Hart, now in this port. I made application to the Commanders for their release but did not succeed.\nSince the Capture of this Island I have not been permitted to act in a public Capacity, on account of my being appointed as Consul. Had the Letter Patent expressed Commercial Agent in lieu of Consul I should have been permitted to act, but in a very limited manner; Should affairs be arranged between the two Governments and His Excellency think proper to send me such a commission I have no doubt but I shall be permitted to act on the same principle as other Agents do in English Islands.\nThe Brig Charleston Packet Captn. Charles Connell, with whom I sent all the distressed American Seamen, was boarded off this harbour, and had several Seamen impressed, which I put on board. It would be unnecessary for me to make any comments on the persued by the British Commanders in those seas with regard to impressments. Government no doubt has good information on that subject.\nBy some very late arrivals from England, there has a Orders of Council come out, (and I am sorry that I have not had an opportunity of taking Copies) which are so very pointed at the destruction of our Commerce, that I conceive it my duty to give You the outlines of them, as they appear to me.\nFirst, They declare all ports belonging to the enemies of Great Britain or all Ports where British Vessels are excluded, under Blockade.\nSecondly. All Neutral Vessels bound to any Port in Europe not in Amity with Great Britain must first touch at a port in England, and there enter and clear, pay duties outward and inward, and obtain permission from His B. M. to proceed to French or other Ports.\nThirdly No Produce to be exported in a Neutral Vessel except it be the growth of a British Colony and accompanied with proper proof of the same.\nFourthly. No Neutral Vessel will be permitted to go South of the Equator without His Britannic Majesty\u2019s permission\nand lastly, That all Neutral Vessels will be considered to Know\nthe contents of these orders after the 20th. day of February and if found acting contrary to them will be good and lawful prize to the Captors. In consequence of the situation of this Island for some time past I have been under the necessity of advancing More Money for the releif of Distressed Seamen than I have received on account of the United States, The Accounts and Vouchers for which shall be forwarded by the next opportunity.\nThe Schooner Friendship by which this is forwarded goes so much sooner than I expected that I have not time to send them.\nThe Arrangement of Commerce, since the Capture of this Island, has placed it upon the same footing as it was under the Danish Government for six months, untill his Majesty\u2019s Pleasure is known.\nYou will observe by the Returns that I did not receive the of American Vessels untill the 22d. Septr. I could not make the Necessary arrangements with the Danish Government sooner The Blockade commenced on the 24th October, after which date No American was pemitted to enter. I shall still continue to give you every information that I may conceive beneficial to our Country, and render to my Countrymen that may chance to be here, every service in my power. I have the Honor to be very Sir, Your most obt & very humble Servt\nJames McGreggar", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2515", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Larkin Smith, 4 January 1808\nFrom: Smith, Larkin\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nCollectors Office Norfolk Jany 4th. 1808\nI was unfortunately absent from this place, when Mr. Rose the British Envoy extraordinary arrived here; the Deputy Collector I find has made a communication to Mr. Gallatin relative to a request made by the British Consul, at the instance of Mr. Rose, asking assurances that the Frigate Statira, (in consequence of her being the vehicle for the conveyance of Mr. Rose on his mission to this country) should be received on the same footing, as the National ships of any other country in amity with the U. States of America. Yesterday I had an interview with the British Consul, who was urgent in pressing me to decide on the requisition above stated, assigning as a reason, that Mr. Rose could neither land or proceed to the seat of Govt. untill such assurances were given. From the Proclamation of the President of the U. States, and the instructions given by the State and Treasury departments, I am clearly of opinion that no such power is extended to me, as the Collector for this place; and altho I am disposed to do everything in my power to remove obstacles in the present case, I nevertheless think it prudent to act in a way not to embarras, or commit the Government. I have therefore decided to", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2516", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Thomas Appleton, 4 January 1808\nFrom: Appleton, Thomas\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nLeghorn 4th. January 1808\nMy last respects were in date of the 17th of December, conveying to you at the same time Copy of a circular letter from Naples, Copy of one from C: D: Coxe Consul at Tunis, Notes made at Malta on the trial of thirty american Vessels, and the original letter of Samuel Field to me, of what occur\u2019d on his trial by the Vice Admiralty Court of that island.\nMy two preceding dispatches were on the 26th. and 10th. of November. I have now, Sir, the satisfaction to inform you that the differences which have lately existed with the regency of Algiers have been amicably adjusted by Collo. Lear as you will observe by the inclos\u2019d copy of a letter I have this day receiv\u2019d from him, and which had been convey\u2019d to me by the Brig violet, lately detain\u2019d in that regency. In consequence of this intelligence all the american vessels now here will depart very shortly in ballast for the U\u2019States. I shall by the post of to-day communicate this information to our Consuls in Naples, Trieste Marseilles; as likewise to Mr. Armstrong at Paris. Mr Lear in his private letter to me says \"I do not credit the account of the recapture of the Schooner and destroying the turks; but it has made an impression here. It will not however have any effect on the government, unless confirmed beyond a doubt, and even should that be the Case, I think it will not produce any serious effect. The two other vessels have been detained thus long, in consequence of their arriving early in the fast of Ramadan; during which time the Dey will not attend to any business, unless of the first importance to himself, and at the close of that ceremony I was attack\u2019d by a violent inflamatory fever which confin\u2019d me to my bed for ten days. In my first interview with the Dey all was arrang\u2019d.\"\nThe american property which was here under arrestation, as being either of the growth, or manufacture of Great Britain or her possessions, was \ncertainly a distressing circumstance; but the late embarrassments laid on Commerce by England & France, have Caus\u2019d such a rapid augmentation in the prices of all Merchandize, as will assuredly more than defray all the expences and charges impos\u2019d on them. I mention this, to soften the clamours, that the parties interested may possibly make. The necessity of availing myself of this days post to forward the circulars to our Consuls; and the departure of the vessel in the Course of the morning which will convey this letter to you, leaves me only the time to renew the Assurances of the high respect with which I have the honor to be Your Most Obedt. Servt.\nTh: Appleton", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2518", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Valentin de Foronda, 5 January 1808\nFrom: Foronda, Valentin de\nTo: Madison, James\nMuy Se\u0148or mio:\nPhilada. 5 de Enero de 1808.\nTengo la proporcion de un Pilotboat, Goleta muy velera, con la Marineria pronta, que estaba destinado para otro objeto, y que me conviene; pero es de 190. toneladas, que saldr\u00e1 y entrara en lastre: asi espero que se s\u00edrva V. S. dar las ordenes competentes al Se\u0148or Ministro de Hacienda, con la Mayor prontitud, no sea que se jele el R\u00edo.\nTambien escribo al Se\u0148or Ministro de Hacienda, diciendole el nombre del Pilotboat-Goleta, el numero de las toneladas y el Capitan.Me ofrezco \u00e0 la disposicion de V. S. y pido \u00e1 Dios le gue. Ms. as. B. L. M. de V S su mas atento servidor\nValentin de Foronda", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2519", "content": "Title: From James Madison to James Monroe, 5 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Monroe, James\nDear Sir\nWashington Jany 5. 1808\nHoping that a post note on Norfolk will be cash in Richmond, I enclose one for $300, instead of committing bank notes to the mail.\nNothing has occurred since you left us worth detailing to you. We are still uninformed of the precise circumstances which have detained Mr. Rose on board the frigate. There is a report that he will either pass up the bay to Annapolis, or possibly engage a vessel to bring him immediately to this place. As a precaution, for the former event, an express carried yesterday an instruction to the Collector similar to the one sent to Norfolk. Be so good as to keep in mind your promise to note to me the passages in your correspondence proper to be withheld from Congs; in the event of a communication of our Affair with G. Britain. Mrs. M offers with mine best regards to Mrs. Monroe & Miss Eliza. Yrs. very sincerely\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2522", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Kirkpatrick, 5 January 1808\nFrom: Kirkpatrick, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nMalaga 5 Jany 1808\nBy my last Letter of the 15 Dec. I enclosed Copies of the Information I had received from Barcelona, and Marseilles regarding the Hostilities commenced on our Commerce by the Cruizers of the Dey of Algiers, & am now happy in having it in my Power to transmit Copy of a Letter I have Just received from Colo. Lear under date 16/ 17 Decr. with the pleasing Information that He has succeeded in adjusting matters with the Dey, and that the Vessels captured, had been Set at Liberty, which I hasten to Communicate to you, by a Vessel on the departure for Salem.\nThe Quarantine on Vessels from the U.S. which I had succeeded to reduce here to Ten Days I am sorry has again been Augmented to forty, in consequence of advice received in Madrid that the Yellow fever was broken out in some of the Southern States. I respectfully remain Sir Your most obed & hl. St.\nWillm. Kirkpatrick", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-06-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2523", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George William Erving, 6 January 1808\nFrom: Erving, George William\nTo: Madison, James\nNo 39Triplicate\nSir,\nMadrid Jany 6. 1808\nI hasten to transmit to you copy of a Decree issued by this government on the 3d. Inst, adopting the principles of the decree given at Milan on the 17th Ulto by the Emperor of France, & conceived (as to the Enacting part) in precisely the same terms: This has been communicated to me by Mr. Cevallos in a note of yesterday\u2019s date unaccompanied by any observation on it. I have the honor to be Sir with the Most perfect Respect & consideration your very obt. St.\nGeorge W Erving\nP S. I have not been able to procure another copy of the Spanish decree to dispatch with this letter; the French decree is therefore inclosed: There is only one omission in the Spanish translation; which must be presumed to have arisen from the haste of the translator; it is the following words in the 3d. Article. \"Ou allant en Angleterre ou dans les colonies anglaises ou dans les pays occupes par les troupes anglaises\".", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-06-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2524", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George William Erving, 6 January 1808\nFrom: Erving, George William\nTo: Madison, James\nNo 3.Private\nDuplicate\nDear Sir,\nMadrid Jany 6th. 1808\nMy last official letter (dated Decr. 28) communicated the arrangement made by Coll. Lear with the dey of Algiers, the one previous, (that of Decr. 22) was upon several subjects & the unofficial letter which accompanied it related principally to the affairs of Portugal, & the relations between this country & france.\nIt appears that the Emperor of France his decree dated under 17 Decr. was published instantly on Receiving the British decree to which it refers; it woud surely have been most judicious not to have proceeded with such rapidity, to have attended the effect which the british measure was likely to produce in our country. The same delays & difficulties have not been made here to the adoption of the Emperors views on this occasion, as were experienced on the issuing the first blockade decree; have been assumed as soon as Received, & special care has been taken that there shoud be nothing Equivocal in the mode. This alacrity arises from the apprehension (no longer a mystery or matter of concealment) which this government feels for its own security. The affair of the marriage is suspended; tho Portugal is occupied still an immense number of french troops is pouring into this country, & they extend themselves even to the passes of the mountains of Castile: The Queen of Etruria who as is stated abdicated her throne in virtue of a convintion made at Paris, & by that convintion was Secured an indemnity in Portugal; has not yet received Such indemnity, & remains at present only an Infanta of Spain; the King who was also by the same convention promised another part of Portugal, for the purpose of establishing in it the prince of peace, has not yet had his portion set off to him; The Emperor tho Returned to Paris is most unquestionably coming as far as Bourdeaux, & it is beleived Bayonne; it may be further.\nThe part of Portugal said to be destined for the Prince of Peace is Algarvia, & this beleif is supported by the circumstance of that province being actually occupied by Spanish troops.\nThe number of french troops actually entered here by way of Bayonne, above what I have specified in former letters; is I think about 80.000; a marshall of france commands the last portion which has arrived; & prince Murat being at Bourdeaux it may be expected that he will come also; It does not appear that any troops have Entered as yet by way of Catalonia.\nThe Queen of Etruria has been continually expected here, & the necessary relays to bring her from Barcelona have been sent; yet, by fresh advices she was still at Milan. The kingdom of Italy has been extended by the addition of some parts of Tuscany, & the Emperor has declared the Vice Roy Prince Eugene Beauharnois (son of the Empress) heir to that throne, & has created him prince of Venice; this arrangement so far from discouraging, perhaps rather confirms the report referred to in my letter of Decr. 10. Meltzi is created duke of Venice Lucien Buonaparte had an interview with his brother, so that no longer doubt is Entertained of the reconciliation mentioned in a former letter, but that a suitable provision will be made for him I have heard (but nothing can be wholly Relied on) that the Emperors mother will be made Queen of Rome & Lucien her successor With sincere Respect & Esteem I am Dear Sir Your very obliged & obt. St.\nGeorge W Erving\nPS\nYou will be struck with the omission of Some important words in this spanish translation of the french decree. In the 3d. Article the words \"ou allant en Angleterre ou dans les colonies anglaises ou dans les pays occupes par les troupes anglaises .\" But this in all probability is attributable only to their not being used to do things in such a hurry.\nGWE\nThe omission referred to is the more curious as the same Madrid Gazette which contains the spanish decree contains also the french; in the translation of which no omission is made. I send the whole gazette as you will find in it the interesting news from Italy hereinbefore referred to.\nGWEJany. 8.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-06-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2525", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Abraham Gibbs, 6 January 1808\nFrom: Gibbs, Abraham\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nPalermo 6th. Jany. 1808\nAt the request of Mr Thomas Lear Consul at Algiers, I have the honor to transmit you herewith Copy of his Circular of 16th: December ulto containing the Intelligence of the release of the American Vessels detained by the Algerines &c.\nIn the same time I forward you the returns of the American trade at this port between 1st. July, & 31st. december last: the American Commerce Was greater last year, than it ever was before in this Island & more than 80 Vessels entered this port during the same; but it is to be feared it will be greatly diminished this year by the late Measures adopted by the English and French Governments.\nThe quarantine from America has been reduced to 14 days in this Island.\nI Beg leave to enquire, how Am I to reimburse Myself Should the Sums I pay to the American Seamen that are occasionally found in distress in this Island, exceed the funds I hold for Account of the United States to that purpose. I have the honor to be respectfully Your most obedt. & humble Servt.\nAbram GibbsConsul", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-07-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2529", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Thomas Truxtun, 7 January 1808\nFrom: Truxtun, Thomas\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nPhiladelphia 7th. Jany. 1808.\nThe public have been Troubled with a Correspondence between Mr. John Randolph and General Wilkinson, and I think it possible that every endeavour will be made to procure testimony, however irrelevant to the charge made against the latter. It is at all times extremly unpleasant to a man of feeling and Sensibility, to be called upon to give testimony, in Such Affairs, More particulary Against one, with Whom he once respected. It is true I have Cause to be dissatisfied with Wilkinson. Yet I know Nothing touching the Charges Made Against the General, either of his having received money from the Spanish Government, holding at any time a foreign Commission or any Such things. And as to private Conversation of a different Nature, or hear Say Statements, they can have No Sort of tendency to establish the Charges Against Wilkinson by Mr. Randolph. I am induced to write this Note to Save the Trouble of being Called upon as a Wittness, if Such Should be desired by any person, in the investigation which I understand is to be Made. The time has been when I had power to Say, take this man up or let him go his way, but I declare my heart could Never find, to add Affliction to the Afflicted Mind. I have the honor to be Sir very Respectfully Your Obt. Servt.\nThomas Truxtun", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-07-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2531", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Thomas Jefferson, 7 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Jefferson, Thomas\nDepartment of State Jany 7th. 1808\nThe Secretary of State in compliance with the Note of the President, relating to the public property at New Orleans, as reported by Governor Claiborne to the Secretary of the Treasury, begs leave to state that no part of that property appears to fall in any respect under the purview of the Department of State, unless it be the Government House, and the lot on which it stands. This it is inferred from the representation given by Governor Claiborne, might be disposed of for a greater sum than would provide accommodations for the Governor of the Orleans territory, in a part of the City more eligible for his residence. It would require however further knowledge of the local circumstances, to enable the Secretary of State, to judge of the expediency of such a proceeding. And it is presumable from the character given of the lot in question that delay will not be attended with less advance in its value than will be incident to the spot which might be substituted; so that the proposed sale and substitution, may probably at any time be carried into effect, without loss to the public Respectfully submitted.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2532", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Robert R. Livingston, 8 January 1808\nFrom: Livingston, Robert R.\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nClerMont 8th. Jany 1808\nPresuming that you will have some means of keeping open the intercourse with Genl. Armstrong, & being very anxious to inform my children in France of the necessity there is for their immediate return, I take the liberty to inclose a letter to my sister, covering one to my daughter, which I pray you to have the goodness to send with your dispatches. I should not have taken the liberty to trouble you had there been any other way of forwarding my letters. Tho the embargo is a wise & prudent measure, yet it will be a dreadful calamity to a great number of American citizens now in Europe. Cut off from all communication with their friends, & from all their resources, they will be reduced to the greatest distress unless our government should facilitate their return by the establishment of such packets as could take them, & their property, not designed for sale, as it is certainly proper to get our citizens, & all they have out of the reach of those with whom we may be at war, & indeed is in some sort a duty we owe them, would it not be well when ships may be got on the easiest terms to commission five or six as packets. The freight & passage money would defray the expence of hiring them, & we should know what was passing in Europe thro\u2019 some other channels than the british papers\nI am extremely hurt at the conduct of the federal members in Congress & their news paper Editors relative to the embargo. Tho it meets the general sentiment as a measure that may lead to peace, or preserve much to the country in case of war. yet by their opposition they endeavour to destroy the first effect of it, by inducing a belief in foreign countries that the people are discontented under it, & that of course, it will not long be observed. One would think the present moment too critical to suffer any man that wished well to his country, to weaken the hands of government for party purposes. I have the honor to be Dear Sir with much esteem & respect Your Most Ob hum Sert\nRob R Livingston", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2533", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Peder Pedersen, 8 January 1808\nFrom: Pedersen, Peder\nTo: Madison, James\nMonsieur,\nPhiladelphie le 18 Janvier 1808.\nJ\u2019ai l\u2019honneur de Vous pr\u00e9venir Monsieur, que je me propose de faire usage de la permission pour expedier deux batiments en lest, que Vous avez bien voulu m\u2019accorder de la part de Son Excellence Mr. le Pr\u00e9sident, par Votre lettre du 30 de Decr. et que consequ\u00e9ment j\u2019ai fait mes arrangements pour expedier du port de Baltimore une go\u00eblette pour les Isles Danoises aux Indes occidentales; j\u2019ai charg\u00e9 Mr. de Bruce de m\u2019en procurer une et il aura l\u2019honneur de r\u00e9mettre \u00e0 Monsr. le Secretaire de la Tresorerie une lettre de ma part avec l\u2019information requise. J\u2019ai l\u2019honneur d\u2019\u00eatre bien respecteusement Monsieur Votre tr\u00e8s-humble et tr\u00e8s-obeissant Serviteur\nPr: Pedersen", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2536", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Thomas Jefferson, 8 January 1808\nFrom: Jefferson, Thomas\nTo: Madison, James\nThe inclosed act of Michigan, tho\u2019 dated Jan. 30. 07. did not get here till the last Congress had risen. It seems merely occasional, & the occasion passed over. I think therefore it is not worth communicating singly to Congress. Perhaps they will send their collection to be communicated, which will embrace this. In the mean time this may be filed in your office.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2537", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Daniel Sheldon, 8 January 1808\nFrom: Sheldon, Daniel\nTo: Madison, James\nD. Sheldon returns the letter of the Chevalier de Foronda to Mr. Madison and begs leave to subjoin a copy of the answer which Mr. Gallatin has given to his letter to him.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2538", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Littleton Waller Tazewell, 8 January 1808\nFrom: Tazewell, Littleton Waller\nTo: Madison, James\nSir;\nNorfolk, Virginia United States Ship Chesapeake January 8. 1808.\nA General Court Martial is now in session on board this Ship, lying in this harbour, for the trial of Commodore James Barron upon certain charges preferred against him, and the said James Barron having represented that your testimony will be material towards his defence, I am to desire you and you are hereby summoned to give your attendance at the said Court Martial forthwith in order to your being examined as a Witness.\nYou will be pleased to acknowledge the receipt of this letter of summons. I am very respectfully your mo: obedt. servt.\nLittn: W TazewellJudge Advocate", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2539", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Lee, 8 January 1808\nFrom: Lee, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir!\nBordeaux January 1 1808\nI have the honor to transmit with the return of entrances & clearances at this port from the 1st July, to the 31st December 1807. With great respect I have the honor to remain Your obt Servt.\nWm. Lee", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2540", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Morgan Lewis, 9 January 1808\nFrom: Lewis, Morgan\nTo: Madison, James\nPrivate.\nSir,\nNew York 9th. of Jany: 1808.\nThe personal Knowledge I have had of you from an early period of Life, and the general Approbation your public Conduct has uniformly drawn after it; inspire a Confidence that what is well intended will not be ill- received. Under this Impression I venture to address you on a Subject interesting to the public Welfare and the high-Standing of the Administration.\nIgnorant of the Causes which have produced the Embargo I presume not to hazard an Opinion of it\u2019s Effects on our foreign Relations. But on our domestic Concerns I fear it\u2019s Influence will be unpleasant, unless Measures are early adopted to prevent it. It cannot escape the Observation of Government that an Interdiction on foreign Commerce must throw out of Employment a numerous Class of Citizens, many of them with families, who are dependent on the Wages of the Day for a Subsistence. The principal of these are Seamen, Shipwrights, Rope and Sail-Makers, Riggers, Calkers, Draymen and a Set of Laborers Stiled longShore-Men. Of the first Description it is computed there are now in this City near four thousand Persons, many of whom, being perfect Itinerants, will seek Employment in foreign Countries when they can no longer find it at Home. A British Vessel bound for St. Johns Nova Scotia carried off Yesterday one hundred and fifty of them, and how many more may follow their Example if not employed is impossible to say. Would it not be advisable Sir for Government to take into present pay a Number of them sufficient for the Flota intended to be put into Commission, particularly as I understand they may at this Moment be engaged for less than half the accustomed Wages. The immediate Erection of the Gun-Boats ordered to be built, would, give Employment to many of the other Classes also in the different Navy-Yards.\nThe discontents of these Classes, who are numerous, and some of them respectable, place in the Hands of the Enemies of the Administration a powerful Weapon, which they are wielding with considerable Effect. I allude not to the Federalists alone. A Section of Republicans, far more capable of doing Mischief, are arraying themselves against the Administration, in the Hope of thereby placing G. Clinton in the Presidency. Already do they condemn the Embargo as an impolitic Measure, a Measure of Timidity, and Insinuations are more than whispered that it is a Sacrifice of the national Dignity and Independence to the Views and Mandates of France. A Rumor which prevailed some Days since of Mr. D. Clinton\u2019s being in nomination for V. Prest. it was supposed would silence the Clamor, but it produced no such Effect, and it was easily discernable that that Gentleman preferred being President in Effect, with the Mayoralty of this City, which he doubtless will have, to any other Arrangement. There is Reason to apprehend that Overtures are making by this Section to the Federalists, in the Hope of securing, should there be a Division among the Republicans, the States of Connecticut and Delaware. A Conversation I have just had with a federal Gentleman confirms me in the Suspicion. Accept Sir the unfeigned Assurance of my Esteem\nMorgan Lewis\nSunday. \nA Report is this Instant in Circulation, said to have been transmitted here by Mr. Masters of the House of Representatives, that the republican Members of Congress have determined to recommend to the Electors, G. Clinton for President. Is it possible that a Man of such feeble Intellect, of so few Acquirements, can be thought of at such an interesting Crisis? Surely he need but be conversed with for half an Hour to discover his total Unfitness. Many may have been misled by the unmerited Encomiums lavished in certain Prints on his Talents as a Statesman and Soldier. I have been long intimately acquainted with him, but could never discover them. Of his military Exploits, I have an accurate Knowledge, Of most of them have been an Eye-Witness, and have seen in all a regular Series of Blunders which, in my Opinion, disqualified him for the Command of a Battalion. If the Report be true, I hope the Subject may be reconsidered; and if I thought any Information I could give by a personal Attendance at Washington would have a favorable Influence I would repair there immediately.\nML.\nNB. I write in Confidence.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2541", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Richard Shippey Hackley, 9 January 1808\nFrom: Hackley, Richard Shippey\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nConsulate of the United States of Ama. San Lucar 9th. Jan. 1808.\nFrom the time that has elapsed since my departure from the united States, your department might reasonably have calculated upon communications from me before the present date. Under circumstances that existed on my arrival in Europe, I at once determined not to take upon me the duties applying to the office which I have the honor to hold, until I was accredited here. Two months has not yet elapsed since my Exequatur has been in my possession, and but little more since my residence here, In which time I have visited all the ports in this district (Seville Excepted) and formed Such regulations as circumstances appeared to call for. That Some were necessary, The Inclosed Original Bills of the late Vice Consul at Ayermonte will establish, and Confirm those exhibited to your department in Communications from Cadiz.\nOn the 18th. of November past I received a Letter dated the 8th. of that month from the Office of Legation at Madrid, advising that the Secretary had made application to the ministers of his Catholic Majesty that orders might Issue to facilitate the dispatch of Such american Vessels, as were then in the ports of this Kingdom, And on the 27th of the same month, I received an \"Officio\" from the Intendente, of this province, advising me That he was prepared to give every dispatch required of him to Vessels of the U.S. in the ports of this province, having received Orders from Madrid to that end.\nMr. Kirkpatrick our Consul at Malaga taking proper advantage of the moment, called the board of health to give them; and thereby was enabled to reduce The standing quarantine from 40 to 10 Days. An Individual at Algeziras, Mr. Joseph ODwyer, by his personal exertions obtained a reduction of 20 Days in the quarantine at that place, although in the district of Mr. Yznardi. This district, in other respects independent of that of Cadiz, is in its health office, Subject to the direction of the health office at Cadiz. I waited with some impatience to hear from the Consul at that place on the subject, but being disappointed therein I addressed a Letter under date the 12th December, Copy of which I have the honor to hand You Inclosed. The reply covered Copy of a note addressed from Rota, to the Captain General of the Province, which as might have been expectd produced no notice to the object and in that State the Subject remains, and now no hope of benifit, except a promise to permit our Vessels to discharge their Cargoes at an earlier day, than formerly which is complied with, or not Complied with, agreable to the Caprice of the Board of health, and the feeling they have of the Subject.I arrived in Europe on the 29th July, since which Mr. Yznardi has been in Cadiz but 2 days and a half, And I am well informed he has not visited his office for many months before. That Office, the most important respectable in this part of Europe, is under the direction of James McCann an Irishman, and whose occupation for some time preceding was that of Conveying information to the Enemies of the Country in which he resided. I Know so well the Interest you take in every thing which concerns the honor and Interest of our Country that I have not hesitated to State facts to you, which were they not within my own Knowledge, I would not State upon the Authority of another, and I will add, that Mr Yznardi, in person has used all means to Induce me to take charge of the Consular Office at Cadiz profering me the emoluments, merely retaining to himself the Commission, and admitting at the same time his incapability to perform his Duties, and the impropriety of a man of M.Canns Character, Controuling an office of Such respectability.\nThe Inclosed Copies will Shew to you, the happy Termination of our differences with the Regency of Algeirs.\nMy Next in a few days will Cover returns from this office to the 1st of the present month. With Sentiments of High respect & Esteem I have the Honor to be, Sir Your mo: Obt. Sert.\nRichd S Hackley", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2542", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Larkin Smith, 9 January 1808\nFrom: Smith, Larkin\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nCollectors office Norfolk Jany. 9th. 1808\nI find by a letter from the Department of State addressed to the Mayor of this place, dated the 31st. of July last, a copy of which has been transmitted to this office, by Mr. Daniel Brent in the absence of the Secretary of State; for the guide of the Collector, which states, that by direction of the President, all communications to, and from the British squadron within our waters, must be under a flag of Truce, regulated as usual, by the military commander; with exceptions, as to communication to and from the British Legation.\nI wish to be instructed, how far this regulation is to apply in cases of impressed American seamen, on board of such British ships, and whether it may be proper for me to apply directly to the British commanders, for the releasment of those, who may furnish proof of their citizenship. These instructions are asked, in consequence of several applications having been made by men, on board of the Triumph Capt. Hardy now laying in Linhaven bay. I have the honor to be Sir with great Esteem & respect your Obt. Servant\nLarkin Smith", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2543", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Lee, 9 January 1808\nFrom: Lee, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nBordeaux January 9: 1808.\nThe official article which I have the honor to inclose appeared in the moniteur of the 5th and will be found to merit your attention. In my respects of the 6th I mentioned the names of six of our Vessels which had been taken by french privateers under the two Imperial decrees. Several others have been captured but have not yet arrived. Several privateers are fitting out in the neighbouring ports of Spain and at Bayonne & La Rochelle encouraged by the successes of their brother adventurers and if Genl. Armstrong does not succeed with the Emperor in putting a stop to these depredations our commerce will suffer greatly.\nInclosed is a letter from Mr Montgomery of Alicante. I have the honor to remain your obt St.\nWm: Lee", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2545", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 9 January 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir.\nLondon. Jany. 9. 1808.\nI have the Honor to enclose a Copy of a Note from Mr. Canning, notifying the Blockade of Carthagena, Cadiz, St. Lucar & all intermediate Ports.\nI am taking Measures for communicating it in the usual manner to our Consuls in the United Kingdom. I have the Honor to be with the highest Respect & Consideration Sir, Your Most Obed Hble Servant\nWm: Pinkney", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2547", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Lee, 10 January 1808\nFrom: Lee, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir!\nBordeaux Jany: 10th 1808.\nI have the honor to inclose you a copy of a letter from Col. Lear, which has been forwarded to me by Mr. Erving at Madrid.\nA Privateer belonging to a Mr. Lacombe of this place under Spanish Colours, has captured and conducted into St. Sebastian\u2019s one of our Vessels bound from Virginia to London with Tobacco. The name of the Vessel and Capt. I have not yet learnt.\nThe same privateer has conducted to St. John de Luz, a small port about 12 miles from Bayonne, the Schooner Augusta, Joseph ney master, bound from Salem to Bilboa with Cocoa.\nThe Schooner ico, Capt. Standley, arrived here yesterday from Marblehead with a Cargo of Green fish. This vessel has been halted by a British squadron at the mouth of this river who warned her but she escaped and got into port in the night, and the Captain having made his declaration accordingly, his vessel has been seized by the Custom house in virtue of the decree of the 17th December, which declares all vessels good prizes which shall have suffered on her papers t from a British ship.\nThe Ships Charleston Packet, Capt. Connel of Philadelphia, and the Ship Ceres, Capt. Green of NewYork, have both been refused a clearance at the Custom house of this port, they having been boarded by British Vesels on their passage here, though both sailed several weeks before the decree was promulgated, or even made.\nThe Ship Brothers, from Virginia to London with Tobacco, the Ship Catherine, from Baltimore to Cadiz with Colonial produce, the Ship yades of Saco, from Charleston to London with Rice & St and a ship from Philadelphia to Amsterdam, with Sugar and Coffee, have all been captured by French privateeers, and conducted to Ports in the Channel.\nWe have nothing new since my last respects. Large bodies of troops continue marching thro\u2019 our City, and report says the Royal family of Spain are shortly to embark at Cadiz for Spanish America. With great respect I have the honor to remain Your obt. Servt.\nWm: Lee", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2548", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Gavino, 10 January 1808\nFrom: Gavino, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nGibraltar 10th: January 1808.\nWithout the pleasure of hearing from you I beg leave to refer to what I had the honour of adressing you Pr No. 48 & 49 Pr Copy Inclosed, also of Coll. Lears to me & his 2d. Bills to my order on you for $10,000\n$10,00010,0005000}$25,000 that you do the needful therewith to Credit my account with your Honl. Depts. for which purpose I have endorsed same to you.\nWe have in Port about 12 Sail of American Vessels owing to the Brith. order in Council of 11. Novr: last they are geting the Certificates & Protests to proceed.\nThere are three Detained for adjudication Pr note at foot.\nJust arrived a brig found at sea abandond, & sent in by a British sloop of Warr, no Person found on board Supposed to be the Brig Neptune of Baltimore, Commanded by one Patrick from Leghorn bound to Baltimore\nI conjecture that the Crew were apprehensive, of the Sloop of War being an Algereen, & went off in the Boat. I have the honor to be Sir Your obedt. servt.\nJohn Gavino\nVessels Detained for adjudication\nBrig Industry, Jas. Hitchock from New Yor for Barcelona on a Supposed breach of Blocade.\nBrig McCarty Bay , Hutchins from Nants for Lisbon, supposed Violation of the Blocade.\nBrig Ann of Boston Colonial Produce in Quarantin particulars not yet known.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2549", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 10 January 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\nprivate\nDr. Sir,\nLondon, Jany. 10th. 1808.\nI have it from several Quarters that the Austrian Messenger, who arrived here more than a Week ago, to Prince Stahremberg, and who undoubtedly belongs to the Austrian Legation at Paris, was the Bearer of Overtures to this Government for a Negotiation for a general Peace. It is said that the overtures propose the Mediation of Austria & Russia. Great Secrecy is affected upon the Subject; but I am told that the Answer of this Cabinet has just been given, and that the Messenger will return, Tomorrow or next Day. It has been hinted to me that the Answer is evasive & not likely to lead to any immediate Result. I give you this Information as I have received it, without vouching for its accuracy. I shall endeavour by the next opportunity for America more precise Information on this Point. Prince Stahremberg has undertaken to send for me by this Messenger a Letter to Gen. Armstrong. I have the Honor to be with sincere attachment Dear Sir, Your most Ob. Serv\nWm. Pinkney\nP. S. At a Meeting on Thursday last of the Committee of Merchants trading to the US, a Memorial to Government on the Subject of the late Orders &c was intended to be proposed, when to prevent the reading of it & a Question upon it, a Motion was made for an ajournment, by Alderman Shaw & carried (I think) 11 to 7. I have not seen this Memorial (as it has been wished & endeavoured to prevent it from getting abroad), but a Copy is now preparing for me and (if of any Interest) I will send it to you as soon as obtained. I shall be much disappointed if a Rupture with us will not become and decidedly appear to be more unpopular every Day.\nTheir Trade & many of their Manufactures are at a Stand, & unexampled Distress & strong Remonstrance must speedily be the Consequence.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-11-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2550", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Ira Allen, 11 January 1808\nFrom: Allen, Ira\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nWashington Jany. 11th. 1808\nLeast the Personal Interview I Recently had with you should not be Clearly Understood I Reduse it to Writing for Consideration Whether in Existing Circumstances Great Britain may not be Indused to Relinquish Jurisdiction to the United States of the South Part of Lower Canada and Upper Canada. I Propose the following Bounds to Include the Small Islands in the South End of Lake St. Peters at which is a Conveniant Place to Command the River St. Lawrence The Latitude may no Doubt be Ascertained by some Chartes of that Country Suppose the Line to Extend East to the Line of the United States, and west so far that Turning south would Intersect the Line of the United States at the west end of Lake Superior. Such an Arangment might be to the mutual Interests of Both Countries for the following Reasons The United States would be Releaved from Indian Wars of any Considerable Consequence The Crown Lands within these Limmits would be of Vallue.\nIf such a Negociation Could be made and that of Parliament might be obtained Establishing a Company for a Ship Canal Similar to the Proposition in the Summary of the Olive Branch which would be Verry Interesting to the People Contiguous to Lake Champlain and the Merchants of Montreal and Quebec would be more benefited by this than the former Proposal of a Ship Canal. As such Ship Canal would Come within the United States an Act of Congress in Support of a Previous Act of Parliament would Secure Such Company in their Interest.\nSome Stipulations might be made for the Northwest Companies Respecting Duties or Drawbacks that Such an Arangment might not be more Injury than the Benefit they might Occationally have in Changing thier Property and Shiping it two and from England as the Property of Citizens of the United States as it would not be Necessary to Extend the Line of the United States so far west as to Include many of the Indian\u2019s with whom they Trade.\nBy Such an arangment the British would Save much Expence they Are the Indians Supporting Garrisons Ptians &c within Such District and Establish Permmant Commertial Advantages and frendship in the North which might be of more Consequence to the Nation than the Jurisdiction over Such District. I am with Great Respect your most Obedient Humble Servt.\nIra Allen", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-11-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2551", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Thomas Fitzsimmons, 11 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Fitzsimmons, Thomas\nSir.\nDept. of State, Jan: 11th: 1808.\nYour letter of the 6th. has, as you desired been laid before the President, who authorises me to inform you that it is in contemplation to dispatch to Europe for public purposes, a Vessel or Vessel, from time to time during the period of the Embargo, and that previous notice of the time & place of departure will be given, with a view to the accommodation of Merchants & others in their foreign correspondences. I am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-11-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2552", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Donald Fraser, 11 January 1808\nFrom: Fraser, Donald\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nNewYork Jany 11th. 1808.\nI had the honor of recieving a letter from You, some weeks since, And embrace the earliest opportunity of returning the favour you have done me, in adding the great weight of your name to the list of my subscribers, to \"The history of all Nations\". You will herewith receive a copy of the first edition of the work. The Second will Shortly be sent to Press, wherein the history of the United States will be greatly enlarged: I have Sent, for the honor of Your acceptance a Copy of my \"Select Biography\".\nThat the unerring Ruler of the Universe may prolong Your useful life till You arrive at the higest Station upon earth, The first Magistrate, Six Millions of free & Enlighted Citizens. Is the hearty wish of one, who has the honor to be very respectfully Sir, Your obdt. Servant\nD. Fraser", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-11-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2553", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Anderson, 11 January 1808\nFrom: Anderson, James\nTo: Madison, James\nTriplicate\nSir!\nHavana Jany. 11. 1808.\nThe last letter that I have had the Honor to write You, was under date of the third of October, accompanied by a list of the names of our unfortunate Countrymen, who died in this City and Harbour with the yellow fever. Since that period, the disease has diminished progressively, and I have now the Happiness, to announce to Your Excellency, that at this moment Strangers as well as the Inhabitants of this place, enjoy the Common Run of good health, belonging to other populous Cities. At the foot of this letter will be subjoined the Names of those who have died since the month of October last, and I flatter myself Sir! that this will be the only letter, that I shall have to write upon so painful a Subject at least for many months to Come. From about the middle of October to the end of the last year, a greater number than usual of our Vessels arrived in this port from Jamaica and New Orleans after experiencing very long and tedious passages, with more or less damage from bad weather. The Seamen on board of our Vessels from Jamaica, were in general afflicted with the Fever, and in more Cases than one, were oblidged to put into this Harbour for Relief. I have Reason to believe, that Some of them have since died, whose names have not been given in at the Office.\nI have now the honor Sir to transmit a list of the American Vessels, that have arrived in this port from the united States, and elsewhere, Since the thirtieth day of June, to the first instant. Though the list is not as perfect, as I could wish it, Yet I hope, it will enable your Excellency to form a pretty good Idea, of the Importance of the Trade, carried on between this Island, and the united States of America. Notwithstanding the dangers of the Navigation, and the Excessive duties imposed on us by the Spanish Government, our Merchants appear to be as eager as ever in the pursuit of the Trade. When the wind continues Southerly for ten or twelve days, and then favourable, our Vessels tumble in by dozens, and glut the market for a time, with almost every article. Within these few days past, more than Eight thousand Barrels of Flour have Come to this City, and unless an Embargo has Really taken place in the United States, as many people here wish and believe, large sums of money will be lost on the late Shipments to this place. A total Suspension of Commerce to this City, for at least three months, would be truly advantageous to the American Merchants, who have property in it, as it would enable them to Sell what goods they have on hand to great Advantage, which has not been the Case Since my Arrival in this Island. Although the produce of this Country is lower now than ever, particularly Sugars, it seldom happens, that a good Voyage is made, and when made, the Major part of the profits are swallowed by the Expences, & a bad Voyage often proves a total loss to the Shippers.\nIt is much to be lamented, Sir, that our Government have not Sufficient Influence with the Court of Spain to procure a diminution of the high duties, which are laid upon the Produce of our Country and other Articles exported from the united States.\nTo Retaliate, were it possible, would be as just as politic, but it does not belong to me, Sir, to make to You Such observations; and I hope Your Excellency will have the Goodness to pardon me for having had the presumption to have done So.\nBy the Recommendation of Several American Merchants I have taken the liberty to appoint Mr. John Latting, a native Citizen of the State of Newyork, to act as Vice Commercial & Navy Agent at Matanzas. This Gentleman has resided three or Four years at that place and has a very good Reputation. I hope Sir the Step, which I have taken will meet with your Approbation.\nI profit by the Return of a Gentleman to the united States to Send you Sir a Small quantity of Tobacco Seed, the product of a plant, that grew most luxuriantly upon a little spot of ground belonging to the House I live in. I have Reason to believe, the plant to be of the first quality, and I shall Consider myself truly fortunate, Should you deign Sir, to honour me with Your Acceptance. If agreeable, the annual produce of my little Garden shall be sent to Your Excellency. With the greatest Respect I have the honor to be, Sir! Your most obedient & very Humble Servant\nJames Anderson.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-11-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2554", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Eichelberger, 11 January 1808\nFrom: Eichelberger, George\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nBalte. No. 4 Water street. 11th. Jany. 1808.\nI hope you will pardon the freedom I have taken, in troubling you with the following request, viz, That you will please to inform me by the very first opportunity, of the circumstances that caus\u2019d the revocation of the exequater granted to Anthony Morales as Consul General or charge des affaires of the King of Holland. Your Compliance will much oblige your\u2019s Most respectfully\nGeo. Eichelberger", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2557", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Jarvis, 12 January 1808\nFrom: Jarvis, William\nTo: Madison, James\n(Copy)\nSir!\nLisbon 12th: January 1808.\nThe inclosures of the 21st: Ulto. 4th & 9th instant are copies of my three last letters which went by the way of St: Uber in the Brig Perseverance Captn: Atkins for New York & the Ship Active Capt: King for Philadelphia. I have now the honor to inform you, that after several applications, both verbal & written, Passports have been granted for our Vessels to proceed to Sea, with the promise that in future there shall be no detention whatever. I have been also authorised to say that our Vessels would be admitted into the Ports of this Kingdom, no matter from whence they came without any questions being asked, when laded with Provisions. The order is passed at the Customhouse for the admission of them Rice.\nAmong the numbers of arrestations which has been made in this Kingdom of British Subjects, was Mr.Wm Baker, my Consular Agent for Figueira, who with the Partners of the house have held the Office 17 Years: and with His effects the Judge included four hundred barrels of flour & twenty of Corn imported in the Schooner Lucy Captain Cotton from Plymouth belonging to Messrs. Daniel & Charles Jackson of that place. When I was made acquainted with it about a fortnight ago I made a verbal application to Monsr. Herman the Administrator General of the Finances & to Monsr: charged with the Sequestration of British Property, & was glad to learn from Figueira Yesterday that the Sequestration was taken off the property & that Mr Wm: Baker was freed from his confinement to His house.\nAs there is no means yet out, of Quadrating the cravings of hunger with the Quantity of Provisions, the Blockade of this Port is likely to cause the greatest distress. Whilst the British Government are professing in their public Do in England, the greatest regard to the Portugueze Nation, by way of a proof of their friendship they are in act actually Starving them. The Supply of an Army of 25 to thirty thousand Men, in a conquered, or what is tantamaunt a conquered City must be certain; and should all the inhabitants starve the Army must be fed; so that preventing the entry of Provisions they do not injure the French Army but the inhabitants of Portugal.\nReviewing my last letter I am Still more Strongly impressed with the wish I in that took the liberty to express that my Country would not be involved in Active offensive operations against Gt: Britain. It is appears to me that they will be with an expensive highly injurious to the public, without causing any proportionate injury to the enemy. On the reverse from the financial necessities of that Nation I imagine we can injure them much more by defensive measures. Prohibiting their Manufactures, laying an embargo, and if necessary Sequestering British Debt as a Security for the just demands of the Americans for the payment of their illegal Captures is a much more Secure & certain means of bringing that Government to a compliance with our just demands. In fact the destruction of our Commerce leaves us no alternative but that of prohibiting their Manufactures, unless we Suffer the whole wealth of our Country to be drawn from us to pay for those articles of superfluity. Their prohibition too, will be attended with the advantage of intrading the Manufactures of the Cotton & other produce of our own Soil & rendering us more independent of Foreign Nations in addition to Keeping our Wealth within ourselves. An embargo Presents the obvious advantages of securing our property at the same time we distress Gt: Britain both at home & abroad.\nThe Schooner New York having been Stranded near Vilha Real, & an extraordinary demand made for duties, I wrote to General Solano, who particularly governs all Portugal South of the Tagus, to order their remission which he said to the Vice Consul at St: Uber who delivered the letter he would immediately do. The inclosed of the 4th Jany. is a Copy of that letter. Inclosed are Copies of my letters to General Junot 24th: Decr: & 4th: Instant to the detention of our Vessels, Duplicates of letters to you of the 21st: Decr: & the 4th: & 9th: inst a copy of a letter from Mr. Lear a letter from Mr. Erving & the Several public Orders of General Junot. With perfect Respect I have the honor to be Sir! Yr: Mo: Obedt: Servt:\nWilliam Jarvis\nN. B. In the course of the foregoing I have mentioned the passports had been granted to our vessels and although I much doubt whether I deserve praise or Censure in this transaction, yet I think it my duty to acquaint you with the particulars which related to it; trusting that as I have acted as I thought most conducive to the interest of my Countrymen, I shall merit the excuse of Government although the affair has been attended with some irregularity. After the several applications I had made both verbal & written to Genl. Junot & Monsr. Herman, for permission for our vessels to proceed to Sea, to the former of which I always experienced the utmost politeness & constant promise of their being granted immediately; I personally applied again on the 10th. instant to Genl. Junot to know his determination, as mentioned in my last. The 10th I sent to know what it was. The answer was that it was necessary to see the proprietors of the Cargo, all which I sent, when the Secretary observed that the passports would be given in the evening. The Baron Stocqueler, Austrian Consul General, who is also Consul General of the Hanse Towns had been waiting there some time on the same business. Shortly after I received this answer the Austrian Vice Consul who was there with the Consul Genl. called on me & said that he beleived the passports would not be given without being paid for. A little before dinner Captns. Williams & Kitts (both bound home) had been sent and were taken into a room, when a Gentleman of the General\u2019s family told them, that he had the passports in his hands, shewing them, and if they would give fifty pieces a piece for them they should have them. This they positively refused. then fell to forty, then to thirty, which they still refusing the Gentleman observed in French (which Captn Williams talks very well) that he was charged with the business of the passports & that he would give them his honor that they should not have them without paying for . I sent in the evening, but no one could be seen Of the Austrian Vice Consul in the evening they demanded fifty pieces for each vessel. Something of the kind had been indirectly mentioned to me through a third person some days before, when I observed that if any accommodations in trade were given, my Countrymen would have no objection to pay for them but as to the fair open trade between the United States & Portugal and back it was entirely out of the question. In this way I have no doubt they would have been perfectly satisfied to understand it, had not the same two Captains that were sent for, by the advice of some busy person, sent a petition to the General for their passports, it being suggested to them that they were detained on account of the two others bound to the Northward This I learnt only after the proposition had been made to them for the 50 pcs. To have taken the Treaty between the two Nations to convince them of the impropriety of the detention & to rebut the demand when the more powerful arguments of the want of the Country for Bread Stuffs & of the immediate departure of the vessels affording the most ready & sure means of a supply, I considered as useless; for rights & of this kind have Seldom much weight with men who from profession are in the habit of construing Treaties with their Swords. I consequently determined to wait on the Gentleman & make the best money bargain I could with him; which by interesting him in the immediate dispatch of the passports would in the end be a considerable saving to our flag. I therefore in the morning waited on him & after the usual salutations observed to him \"Monsr: vous etes baucoup trop fort and after conversing about an hour, I observed that there could be no doubt that a reasonable fee ought to be given for the dispatch of papers & when any facilities of trade were granted that more could be afforded. I proposed five pieces (Joes) for Captn Kitts & ten for captain Williams (both as before observed bound home) fifteen for a small Schooner bound to the North & thirty for a Brig; which after some farther talk & consulting with another he complied with: and that all vessels bound to the United States over 200 Tons should pay as a fee of Office ten pieces & all under five pieces; and that those bound to the North over 250 Tons should pay fifty pieces over 200 & under 250 forty pieces over 150 30 pcs. over 100 = 20 pcs. & under 15 pcs. but were to be allowed to go wherever agreeable & the passports to be granted immediately. As this would prevent the demand of the troublesome & inconvenient bonds not to go to an enemy\u2019s port, which had been demanded in several places where the French Armies had entered, would prevent all embarrassments & detentions similar to what had been experienced in other places particularly Hamburg for six months, would be the means of giving the Vessels now in port enormous freights, who have the Certificates formerly mentioned, would prevent the probability of much greater impositions was each Individual left to bargain for themselves, as the present cannot be considered as a regular Government, I concluded it best to do what I never have done before and what I certainly would not have submitted to from an established Government. This transaction may be deemed as departing somewhat from Official dignity but when an unmeaning Official consequence comes in competition with the interest of my Countrymen, I shall always be content to much of the exterior importance of Office to their accommodation & advantage. The Austrian Consul General was perfectly content to comply with the same terms for his flag The freighters of the two vessels bound to the North paid the whole for those two vessels.\nLord Chesterfield says the manner is every thing. I was never more disposed to acquiesce in the justice of this observation: for the person I was carrying on the very honorable & truly dutchmanlike negotiation with is a Man of polite & polished manners, and really conducted the business with so much ease & in a stile so Gentleman like, that I almost lost sight of the nature of the transaction The perquisite I understood was to be divided amongs three. With Respect & \nW\u2014 J\u2014", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2558", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Thomas Fitzsimmons, 12 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Fitzsimmons, Thomas\nJanuary 12, 1808.\nThe President of the United States, authorises me to inform you, that it is in contemplation to dispatch to Europe, for public purposes, a vessel or vessels, from time to time, during the period of the embargo\u0336and that previous notice of the time and place of departure will be given, with a view to the accommodation of merchants and others in their foreign correspondence.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2559", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Eliphalet Land and Co, 12 January 1808\nFrom: Eliphalet Land and Co\nTo: Madison, James\nHond. Sir.\nWeymouth, Jany. 12th. 1808.\nWith diffidence we enclose the following lines that in your Official capacity you will be able to furnish the Fathers & Guardians of our Country in Congress Assembled, of one more loss, which may be added to the great catalouge of losses experienced in our Commerce in the capture of our Ships sailing upon the high Seas.\nThe Ship Commerce of Weymouth, in the County of Norfolk & Commonwealth of Massachusetts, burdened 214 tons, almost new, owned by Eliphalet Land & Co. of said Weymouth, sailed from Boston, January 7th. 1807, bound to Leghorn from thence. She went to Manfredonia, within the Gulph of Venice, there took a freight of Wheat for Lisbon. On her passage, say the 13th. of June, was captured by a Russian Privateer & conducted into Corfu, an Island within the Straits, and there condemned, Ship & Cargo. By advice from our Captain, the same persons who composed the Court, were Masters & owners of said Privateer. To you we look up for redress. To you we look for protection.\nWe considered the Ship in a fair & lawful trade, a Neutral Ship, bound to a neutral port, And after paying in nearly Thirty thousand dollars, by our Infant Company, in about three years as duties on Goods brought, in our Vessels, we in some degree implore your aid, in reclaiming our Ship, freight, commissions & detention. This we pray you to take into your wise consideration & as in duty bound will ever pray.\n(signed)Eliphalet Land & Co.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-13-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2560", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Armstrong, Jr., 13 January 1808\nFrom: Armstrong, John, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nParis 13 Jany 1808.\nThe conjecture offered in my last letter with regard to the Embargo of our vessels, turns out to be correct. The order was intended to be confined to vessels of friendly and allied powers, or powers having both these characters. The word neutral crept into it merely by mistake. An extract from the Minister\u2019s letter to me on that subject is as follows viz \"Aucun ordre n\u2019a ete donn\u00e9 pour retenir les Navires neutres dans les ports de l\u2019Empire, et d\u00e8s que j\u2019ai eu connaissance de l\u2019erreur commise \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard je me suis h\u00e2t\u00e9 de la relever et de notifier express\u00e9ment que les Navires neutres et particulierement ceux des Etats Unis devaient jouir de d\u2019une enti\u00e8re libert\u00e9.\" I subjoin also a copy of a letter in answer to the remonstrances I have made against the new arr\u00eat\u00e9 of the 17th. of Decembr. last. By this you will see that the captures under this decree, like those under that of Nov. 1806, are in the nature of detentions, and that in the contingency of an exclusion of British Commerce from the United States the Ships and cargoes will be immediately released. I expect from one moment to another the Emperor\u2019s orders for immediately raising all the sequestrations which have taken place under the Nov. decree.\nThe negociation for a peace thro\u2019 the medium of Austria has failed. The Emperor\u2019s views seem to be seriously turned towards Spain. I labor most diligently the adjustment of our disputes with that power. From all I can See the moment is favourable to that object, but I need not tell an old Statesman that there may be much that cannot be Seen but by those behind the curtain. On the whole, my opinion continues to be what it was at the date of my letter of the 15th. November last. The measure, (or rather the preparation for taking the measure) then suggested, ought not to be delayed. If found unnecessary, it may be readily relinquished. I have the honor to be, with much respect Sir, Your most Obedient & humble Servant,\nJohn Armstrong.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-13-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2561", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Henry Dearborn, 13 January 1808\nFrom: Dearborn, Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nWar Department January 13th: 1808\nPresuming it will be proper to furnish the Court of Enquiry, no sitting, with such information as may be deposited in the public Offices, in relation to the charge against Genl: Wilkinson, viz. that of his having received a pension from the Spanish Government, while he held a Commission under the United States, I take the liberty of requesting a List of such persons, (as may be selected from the documents in the Department of State,) & as it may be proper to have before the Court to give testimony on the subject of enquiry. I have the honor to be very respectfully, Sir. your Hum. Servt\nH. Dearborn", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-13-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2562", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Levett Harris, 13 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Harris, Levett\nSir.\nDepartment of State, January 13th. 1808.\nIt appears by representations made in behalf of Israel Thorndike, that a Vessel and valuable Cargo belonging to him, was some time since captured in the Channel of Scio, by a Russian Squadron under the Command of Vice-Admiral Senadin, and condemned by a Committee of Prizes attached to the Squadron, on a charge of having violated the Russian Blockade of Smyrna. The suffering party will forward to you the documents relating to the case. He proposes to shew that, contrary to the alledged ground of the sentence, the existence of the blockade was not known at Marseilles, the port from which the Vessel in question sailed, at the time of her sailing. This fact, if duly proven may perhaps at once produce a reversal & redress of the wrongs. But distinct questions present themselves, namely, whether the Blockade was a legal one, according to the definitions laid down by Russia herself in her Treaties, particularly in that with Great Britain in the Year 1801, and whether the attempt to enter the Blockaded Port, was marked by the previous warning requisite to subject the attempt to the final consequences of a breach of Blockade. With respect to the difference between the actual destination of the Vessel and that stated in the clearance, nothing need be added to the plea. That being conformable to usage, it is neither proof nor presumption of illegal intention. With this explanation, and these suggestions it must be left with your own discretion to patronise the case in the manner best adapted to the established course of an appeal from the proceedings of the Committee of Prizes, and most likely to obtain the justice demanded. Should a resort, either immediately, or ultimately be made to the Government itself, You will be careful, in your interposition to manifest all the respect due to such a Sovereign, and the entire confidence which is placed in those rules of justice & of public law, of which he has been so distinguished a patron. It must be left with your own discretion also, how far it may be proper to bring into view, on this occasion, the case of the Vessel, under Russian colours, which was captured by one of our own Ships of war, on her approach to Tripoli, then considered as in a state of Blockade, and was afterwards ordered to be restored. I am &c:\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-13-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2563", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Joseph Warner Rose, 13 January 1808\nFrom: Rose, Joseph Warner\nTo: Madison, James\nSir!\nAntigua 13th January 1808\nOn the 22nd December I had the honor of addressing you duplicate of which you have herewith Since that period the Danish Islands of St. Thomas & Santa Cruz are in the Possession of the British. From the late orders of His Britannic Majesty and the strong rumour of France having declared War against the United States has created much uneasiness in these Islands but Mr Rose\u2019s Mission which is generally supposed to be principally respecting the British West India Colonies and to offer a general Trade is the only hope the Planters have of being well supplied with American Produce. If the presumption of the Mission is correct the Navigation Act must inevitably be suspended and should The President enter into such arrangements and Consuls are to be appointed may I solicit the appointment to the Leeward Islands and I shall feel myself under many Obligations to you in mentioning my Name. I have the Honor to be Sir Your Obedient Servant\nJoseph Rose.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-14-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2564", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Leander Cathcart, 14 January 1808\nFrom: Cathcart, James Leander\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nMadeira Jany. 14th. 1808\nI have the honour to inform you that on the 24th. Ulto. Sir Samuel Hood with Four Sail of the Line, five Frigates & a number of Transports with General Berresford & four Thousand Troops on board, anchor\u2019d within two Cables length of this City & immediately clapped Springs on their Cables & hoisted out their Batteaux & apparently made every preparation to make a vigorous attack upon the Town in case of resistance. At half past three P.M. three British Officers landed & went to the Governors Pallace, who called a Council of War & arrangements immediately took place for landing the Troops & putting them in possession of all the Fortifications, which was effected in all that evening in perfect good order & tranquility. Thus has this valuable Colony fallen a Victim to the Hectors of the Ocean, as Portugal itself to the little petulant Bully of the Continent & the poor Prince Regent has gone with a few Nobles & Priests to his Possessions in the Brazils, not knowing which has done him the greatest injury, his pretended friends or his declared Enemies. The London of Ninety Guns one of the British Squadron that accompanied him to the Brazil touched here on the 11th. Ulto. & gave us the first information of his having abdicated the Throne of his Ancestors if I may be allow\u2019d the expression & had passed by on the night before on his way to the Cape de Verd Islands where the Squadron is to rendevous. This intelligence came very opportunely before the arrival of Sir Samuel Hood & has prevented the effusion of blood for the Governor had every thing prepared to resist their landing before the London arrived but the departure of the Prince alter\u2019d his determination. On the 26th. the Articles of Capitulation were signed & the British Flag was displayed without any parade as a thing of course & a mere trifle in the Scale of National events.\nOn the 1st. of January 1808 An Oath of Allegiance to his Britannic Majesty was administred to the Council & heads of Departments . Books were opened at the Pallace for subscribers to the said Oath. On the 2d. the Embargo was taken off which had existed since the arrival of the Squadron & the Governor indicated to me by letter & likewise, by Message that the Trade between the Island & the United States would not be interupted but permitted to flow in its usual Channel; I have likewise to observe that no Vessel is permitted to clear out at this Island from an interdicted Port, nor are Vessels from thence permitted to land their Cargoes. The Schooner Summer of Boston Capt. Waine, with fish & four Pipes of Brandy from Nantz arrived here a few days ago, but was not permitted to land a single Article, not even sufficient to pay her Port Charges & the Captain was informed that if he was found attempting to enter an interdicted Port he would be captured & condemned. The Brig Equator, Tulloch of Portsmouth N H was boarded off Lisbon by the Defence of 74, The Lieutenant of which endorsed his Register & inform\u2019d Capt. Tulloch that if he was found attempting any interdicted Port that he would be captured and condemned & that this was the general rule of Conduct which would be observed to all Neutrals by British Vessels of War.\nOn the 6th. inst. there sailed a Convoy supposed for the West Indies composed of several Transports & Merchantmen & convoy\u2019d by two Sail of the Line & some smaller Vessels of War. There remains here the Admiral with two sail of the Line & some Frigates, now at Sea upon a Cruize. Whether they intend to take possession of the Azores immediately or wait orders & a reinforcement from England is not known. The Garrison of this Island will consist of between 1500 & 2000 Regulars & it is supposed that Sir Saml. Hood will remain upon this Station for some time & will occasionally co-operate with Sir Sydney Smith who blockades Lisbon with a Squadron of Nine Sail of the Line & Frigates. At Lisbon are six sail of the Line Russians & several sail which the Prince left behind him which have been refitted by the French, but Sir Sydney Smiths Character is too well established in France to make it even probable they will come out to give him battle, unless with a very superior force nor is it very probable when We consider the magnitude of the object that the British has not more than Nine Sail of the Line on that Coast, altho\u2019 only that number are immediately off Lisbon.\nOn the 7th. inst. an American Vessel from the Streights hove in sight & informed the Officer of the Guard Ship that boarded him, that the Emperor of Morocco has declared War against the United States, and that he touched here merely to land a letter for the Consul. The officer answered that he could not land any thing previous to his obtaining permission from the Admiral & added that if he would lay off & on untill he went onshore he would inform the Consul. This the Captain did not think proper to do & immediately bore away, so that I have only this verbal information of the event which must be attributed to the weakness of our Squadron in the Mediterranean & you may depend Sir that We should long \u2019ere now been at War with Tunis of those Barbarians had not been at War among themselves.\nI have nothing farther to communicate at present, A Copy of the Capitulation having already been transmited to the department of State, And continue with the highest respect & esteem Sir Your most obed Servt.\nJames Leander Cathcart", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-14-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2567", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Henry Rose, 14 January 1808\nFrom: Rose, George Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nWashington January 14th. 1808\nHis Britannic Majesty having been pleased to charge me with a Special Mission to The United States of America, I have the honor to notify to you my Arrival, in the Execution of His Majesty\u2019s Commands, and that I am desirous of obtaining an Audience of The President of The United States, for the purpose of delivering to Him His Majesty\u2019s Letter; To Facilitate the accomplishment of it, I beg leave to request your good Offices. I have the honor to be with the highest Consideration, Sir, Your most obedient, and most humble Servant\nG H Rose", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2568", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Shore, 15 January 1808\nFrom: Shore, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nCollectors Office District of Petersburg, Jany. 15, 1808.\nI have the honor herewith to enclose you a Register of American Seamen in this District for the last Quarter ending the 31st. of December, and an Account of those impressed during the same Period. I have the honor to be Very respectfully Sir, & most obedt servt.\nJno. Shore,Collr:", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2569", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Taylor, 15 January 1808\nFrom: Taylor, John\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nVirga. port Royal Jan: 15. 1808\nAlthough I see that you do not like my letters, yet as I like your friendship, I write again, and ask a favor or two, to shew you that I do not feel an atom of that little sensation, which sometimes lurks in the bosoms of the best friends, who happen to differ, even in speculative subjects. Indeed, I cannot persuade myself that we do differ; for I believe that the government are pursueing negociating, and not war measures. I ask myself these questions. Does Thomas Jefferson think an army of 32000 men, less dangerous than an English invasion? Does he think our carrying trade, beneficial to a few capitalists only, a sufficient recompence for ingrafting a perpetual funding system on our policy? Does he think that commercial wars, carried on by loaning, which have reduced England to wretchedness, will endow America with happiness? And I conclude, that, though candour is unquestionably a private, running may be a publick virtue.\nInclosed is a letter to the Secretary of the agricultural society in phia. which I wish very much to go safe, and therefore ask the favor of you to get a member from the city to inclose it to him. It is left open, because I think it relates to a subject, in which your part of our country is deeply interested; for your perusal. Having read the memoir if you choose it, be so good as to seal the letter. I wish I could get you here, that I might shew you the projects I am pursueing in agriculture. None of them are on a small scale.\nWhy will you not send me the pamphlet you promised, written by your brother? I claim your promise.\nNot wishing to trouble the president with an unnecessary letter, will you do me the favor to tell him, \"that I received his, that my relation Mr: Martin has exchanged his mechanical temper for wealth and indolence, that I have already notified him of the request, that as he lives 35 miles from me, I must wait for good weather to see him, but that it shall not be deferred beyond this month, and that, if a proper workman can be procured to execute it, I hope to get the machine he wants. The result shall be communicated to him, when it is ascertained.\u201d\nTake care of the commonwealth. Remember that you may create more dangerous enemies for it, than the British, and that it has deeper interests, than the carrying trade. May the God of peace, and not the Lord of hosts, inspire you! Farewell, yours affl.\nJohn Taylor", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2570", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John George Jackson, 15 January 1808\nFrom: Jackson, John George\nTo: Madison, James\nMy dear Sir,\nClarksburg Jany 15th. 1808\nMy last Letter was calculated to excite the most alarming apprehensions for the life of my beloved Wife & I am sick with grief when I tell you that the present cannot dispel them. She has not had one hours rest since the last Week, & her danger apparently augments every day. The principal complaint is an affection of the breast & throat with a hard dry cough which some time changes & she spits freely, once or twice mixed with blood. Beside these alarming symptoms she appears so totally disordered as to be exceedingly ill. The month of March will be a decisive crisis if no favorable change occurs before if nature can hold out so long without one.\nAh! my Friend what a prospect have I in view. What severe accumulated trials have I to bear against. What a contrast for that ideal happiness which accumulating fortune had painted in all its delusive forms: & which I had e\u2019en grasped at my fingers end. Now almost all the ties of Nature are burst asunder & those which remain to me incapable of resisting one more rude shock, but I will not dwell upon the painful picture for I do wrong in pourtraying it to you my dear Friend, as the interest & the sympathies you feel for us is sufficient without it Farewell, my dear friend yours truly\nJ G Jackson", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-16-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2572", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Lee, 16 January 1808\nFrom: Lee, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir!\nBordeaux Jany. 16th 1808\nTen days ago an order was received from Paris to embargo all neutral and allied vessels in this port, and by this days post the order has been revoked, which gives an opening for five of our vessels already loaded to depart. During this embargo I had the honor of writing you, via St. Sebastians, and Bayonne, enclosing copies of the decree of the 17th December and other interesting official papers, which I now transmit.\nSeveral privateers are now fitting out in the neighboring ports, encouraged by the Government who appear resolved to enforce rigidly both decrees of 21st November 1806, and 17th December 1807. The number of Captures officially known to me as yet are six, viz\nThe Schooner Augusta, of Beverley, carried into St. John de Luz a small port near Bayonne.\nThe Ship Catherine from Baltimore to Cadiz.\nThe Ship Brothers; laden with Tobacco from Virginia to London.\nThe Ship Hyades, with Rice and staves from Charleston to London.\nA Ship from Philadelphia to Amsterdam with Sugar and Coffee name unknown, And\nA vessel loaded with Oil from some port of Massachusetts\nI say officially known, because some of these vessels announced in the Moniteur, and the others Genl. Armstrong in a letter. I yesterday received several of the carried into the ports in the Channel.\nIn this Port we have the Schooners , Capt. Standley Marblehead, with green fish; and the Freedom of Cape Ann, Capt. Jon with Sugar, Cotton & Coffee, detained and seized by the Custom House for having been boarded by British Ships of War, on their passage here. I have stated to Genl. Armstrong the situation of these two vessels, and as soon as the Emperors decision respecting them shall be known, I will transmit it to you, as it will govern in similar cases.\nThe Brigt. Thomas Jefferson, Capt. Goodrich of Boston, engaged for fifteen months past in the coasting trade between this end and the ports of Brittany, has been seized at Morlaix, and the Captain thrown into prison under the impression of his being an Englishman; \"for none but an Englishman\" says the Commissary of Police for that post, \"could have made so many voyages along the coast unmolested.\"\nThe crews of all our vessels as they arrive, are all now strictly examined, each man separately, in order to ascertain if they have been in English ports since the decree of the 21st Nov. 1806 or have been boarded or spoken with by English Cruizers on their passage out. The Director of the Customs of this Port, has even gone so far as to demand of the Consignees of the Ships Charleston Packet of Philadelphia; and Ceres, of New York, bonds to the amount of the value of the vessel, to be paid if the Emperor decides they should be condemned for having been spoken with by the English on their passage here in October last, and the Consignees have the Custom house highly favoured them, by suffering their vessels to clear out in this manner.\nMy Colleague Mr. Montgomery of Alicant in his zeal for the public service, has committed an error which will prove injurious to Capt. Johnson of Marblehead, who is the owner of the Brigt. Salem, which vessel Mr. Montgomery has detained at Alicant, for reasons which the annexed correspondence between us will explain.\nThis City continues to be thronged with troops. Part of the Emperors guards are still here and preparations are making for his reception. These troops must have some other destination than the conquest of Portugal and changing the dynasty of Spain. Twenty five or thirty thousands men would have been sufficient for these purposes, whereas at least one hundred & twenty, perhaps thirty thousand has passed thro\u2019 Bordeaux.\nThose Merchants engaged in this City in the trade with the United States are much alarmed with the present state of things. They view a war between us and England, or with this country as inevitable. Some of them have good information from Paris, and have been engaged for several weeks past in securing the property of their American friends from all possible attacks of the Emperor. I think them unnecessarily alarmed as respects this Country, although I am fully persuaded in my own mind, that nothing short of enforcing the non importation act, and our laying on an embargo will satisfy this government.\nRumours of peace will continue floating into this Country, while the Austrian Ambassador remains in London, and are passing between Dover and Calais, notwithstanding the Moniteur says \"those Messengers regard the relations of Austria only. With great respect, I have the honor to remain, Your obt. Servt.\nWm. Lee", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2573", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Washington Parke Custis, 17 January 1808\nFrom: Custis, George Washington Parke\nTo: Madison, James\nArlington House near Alexandria 17th. Jany 1808\nMr. Custis\u2019s respects to Mr. Madison & begs leave to present him with a lock of Smiths Island Wool, shorn from a tup, lately arrived at Arlington. This Wool, is the growth since last September, & Mr. C beleives may not improperly, be termed American Merino.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2574", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Daniel Dodge, 17 January 1808\nFrom: Dodge, Daniel\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\n374 Pearl Street New York 7 Jan. 1808\nThe relatives of Doctor James Dodge, late Charge des\u2019 Affairs\u2019 for the United States, at the City of Tunis, deceas\u2019d, beg leave to request of Government such aid and information as may be requisite and proper towards the complete adjustment of the unsettled Accounts of the deceas\u2019d; and the recovery of private property that belonged to him, and now suppos\u2019d to be in Tunis and Algiers.\nOf the amount of Salary due the Doctor at the time of his death they have no correct information further than what is contain\u2019d in a letter address\u2019d to one of his Brothers a little time before his death. From this it would appear that something considerable was due him. But on this head they give themselves no uneasiness, as they cherish the most unlimited confidence in the faith and rectitude of Government.\nThey take the liberty of stating that they have understood, from a principle already sanctiond by Government, that the Doctor had a claim as well to the Salary of Surgeon in the Navy as of Consul, and that it is usual in the like cases to allow an outfit. On those points however they pretend not to speak with confidence, but will cheerfully acquiesce in the decision of Government.\nThey hope they will not be thought troublesome or assuming in submitting the following statement.\nBy the Frigate Constitution they have receiv\u2019d from an unknown agent an Inventory of sundry articles, chiefly wearing Apparel, which articles in part accompanied the same; tho\u2019 on examination it appears that several of the most valuable, including some money (, only $7.00 however) mention\u2019d in the Inventory, have been kept back or pilfer\u2019d on the passage home.\nAmong the papers of the deceas\u2019d which have come to hand, is a Receipt in the handwriting of Genl. Eaton acknowledging the payment of $409 -- by the deceased for Articles of furniture in the American House at Tunis, in addition to which the presumption is thought reasonable that many other articles belonging to the Doctor may remain in the same place.\nBy information from the Officers of the Constitution it appears that at the time of the Doctors death he was possess\u2019d of an elegant Horse, esteemed in that Country to be worth $500 -- of which no further account is renderd than that said Horse subsequent to the Doctors death was in possession of Mr. Coxe the present Consul at Tunis, That the Doctors private Journal was taken possession of, and kept by, Coll. Lear the Consul Genl.\nFurther, from the declaration of a person who came here in the Constitution, and was formerly a Servant in the Doctors family in Tunis, they have reason to believe that at the time of his death he was possessed of some very valuable Articles, the production of that Country; Amongst others 50 Bottles Oil of Roses, 6 Bottles Oil of & Jasmina, and one pound of Musk; the whole probably worth in this Country from 600 to 800 Dollars. No account of those articles has been given by any person residing in Barbary. These circumstances are mention\u2019d merely that if the information above noticed should be thought by Government to bear any marks of veracity, some Plan might be suggested, the adoption of which might possibly lead to a recovery of the property, at least in part.\nThe Journal already mentioned the relatives feel extremely anxious to obtain, being decidedly of opinion that they, and they only, have a just right to it.\nThey have to request of you, Sir, as soon as convenient, a line on the subject, stating the course to be taken by them, if any thing further may be thought necessary.\nA person in New York is in possession of a Will and Power of the Doctors, given previous to his sailing for the Mediterranean in 1804. They will only remark further, that an only surviving Child of the deceas\u2019d, a Son of promising genius, has at present but slender means of enabling him to complete an education, which, it is fondly hoped, may lead to future usefulness. I have the honor to be Sir with the greatest respect your most obedient Humble Servt,\n(Signed on behalf of the concerned) Daniel Dodge", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2575", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Anonymous, 17 January 1808\nFrom: Anonymous\nTo: Madison, James\nOh! Divine Providence, save these once happy states from impendent Ruin!SirPhilada. 17th. January 1808.\nthe vessel of the state is now between three Dreadful shoals.\n1o. the corruption from the Gold of England\n2o. the Traitors, instruments of the English Ambition and avarice\n3o. the Carryers, instruments of Both, Britain and traitors.\nin Extraordinary Cases ordinary Means are not sufficient.\nyou are certainly sensible of the intrigues of your Ennemies, in Disorganizing, as much as they can your Governement Every W\u2019day\nyou See Evidently that the Delay of m. Rose since his reaching your shores had for object to obtain documents from your internal Ennemies and his Policy shall be Divide ut imperes. \nthen you must oppose as much Energy now as you have Employed hitherto Prudence.\nthe Captain and mate of a ship pursued By a formidable Ennemy Knowing that several of the officers of the ship, and many of the Crew are Bribed from this very ennemy should secure, first those traiterous officers, force by terror all the crew to accomplish their Duty, and Even throw out part of the Cargo in order to Save the vessel from falling into the hands of the Ennemy\nyou ought in my opinion to imitate in the awful present crisis such an Energy\nto seize on, (with the hands of some Patriots, and pure military Characters, with the people, By a secret and sudden stroke, in the same day Every where in all the united states your Traitors Burr and Co. & their accomplices and lawyers, Marshall chief Justice, Wickam Martin, harper, Bayard &c.&c. to secure them in strong places distant one from another under a strong Guard of pure Patriots and sequestrate immediately their Papers and Properties.\nso it should be done with the secret agents of G. B. in this country.\nthis, coup de Main should have two advantages 1o to Get ride of the internal Ennemies, and to struck with astonishement and terror the External Ennemies, from unexpected Energy.\nas to the illegality of these Measures, it should be always Easy to Justify it towards the people of the U. S: with some Written Conspiration some interupted Correspondence against the Governement and independance of these States. the fact is such and want only to be sanctioned instead of being concealed By the judiciary. more yet the abovementioned traitors are already Execrated by 95 in one hundred of american Citizens who Lament the Little power left in the hands of your Executive.\nthe foreign nations cannot complain of that Private Measure.\nif you do not take it and carry it very soon in Execution I am Affraid you shall be surprised by a British fleet with 25 or 30 thousand regulars and Backed by another Body of transports bringing in one army of 40 or 50 thousand Black soldiers of Christophe (so much Coxed of Late By the English Governement. that army from hayty should be regulars and Landed in your southern states would insurge all the negroes there and Destroy Every thing By sword and fire against the whites, then Carry away the negro\u00ebs. how your militia without Experience nor Discipline could resist such powerful forces.--!!!....\nyour heads of Governement then would run the Risk to be Carried of by a Coup de main with the British Emissaries guided and aided By your Traitors, your internal fo\u00ebs. I have no doubt that those Traitors shall be punished for their infamy not only by their own conscience But Likely By the same Governement Who Employ them. ungratefulness and contempt shall be their Lot.\nfor this country, safety, for your own sake do Carry into Execution that plan as soon as possible then the tune of the proud british minister shall be Lowered. With republican Virtue you Cannot stand against the Crafty wickedness of your numerous Ennemies.\nDo recollect that Being so found of the right and neglecting the Expedient lewis XVI lost his Life and occasioned thous\u2019ernd Evils that he Could prevent with some firmness.\nA Precious Maxim of an English author.\n\"It is not from wicked but from Weak policy that the nations are Ruined (instance, the Danes).\nyou Got Money in the treasury and with it you Can do with impunity Every thing for the preservation of these states and your own.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2578", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Caesar Augustus Rodney, 18 January 1808\nFrom: Rodney, Caesar Augustus\nTo: Madison, James\nMy Dear Sir,\nWilmington ye. 1.18.1808 monday morg.\nI had prepared to leave home on thursday last, but the snow storm that continued all that day prevented & rendered the travelling in my carriage too bad until the road was broken. On terday I should have set off as the weather was fine & the way well beaten, but Mrs. Rodney was much indisposed. I find however by the last Intelligencer that the Envoy has arrived & I leave home this morning in the rain & shall be on as soon as my horses will bring me.\nThe embargo if continued must bring England to her senses. In one of the reports made by a Committee of the house of Commons, I discover that the annual supply of flour to England from this country is from a million to a million & a half of barrels. This too, when the ports of the Baltic & Mediterranean were open to them.\nAs to the few failures that have taken place, I heard one of our Brandywine Millers observe, that he was not so much afraid of persons whom the embargo would really break, as those who would make it, a pretext for breaking.\nI regret to have been so much longer absent than I intended, but my domestic affairs would have required more of my attention could I have spared the time. I am Dr. Sir Yours Very Resy. & Siny.\nC. A. Rodney", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2581", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Jacob Crowninshield, 18 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Crowninshield, Jacob\nSir.\nDept. of State, Jany. 18th. 1808.\nInclosed you will find the papers which you handed to me relative to the case of the American Brig Hector, captured by the Russians, in the Channel of Scio. You will also find enclosed a letter on that subject to Mr. Harris our Consul at Petersburg. It might perhaps be well for Mr. Thorndike, to obtain full proof. 1st. That the Blockade of Smyrna was not known at Marseilles when the Hector left that port; and 2dly. that it is unusal for American Vessels to clear out for one port and go to another. I am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2582", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Josef Yznardy, 18 January 1808\nFrom: Yznardy, Josef\nTo: Madison, James\nRespected Sir.\nConsulate of the United States of America Cadix 18th. January 1808.\nNot doubting but Mr. George W. Erving at Madrid, Keeps you duly advised of every occurence there pr the Packets he forwards me for you Sir, and which I carefully deliver to Captains bound to them States, I will not trouble you with repetition.\nI have been duly honored with the Book of Acts passed at the second session of the 9th. Congress, which you have been so Kind to forward me.\nPlease find the General List of Arrivals, detentions, Condemnations &ca., of American Vessels in this Bay and Algeziras during the last Six Months of the Year Eighteen hundred & Seven.\nI have the honor to enclose you Copy of a Circular Letter received this day from Mr. Tobias Lear at Algiers, and the Spanish Gazette containing a decree which puts a full Stop to navigation in this part of the world. With Sentiments of high Consideration, I am Respected Sir, Your most obedt. Servant\nJosef Yznardy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2583", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Littleton Waller Tazewell, 18 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Tazewell, Littleton Waller\nSir.\nDepartment of State, January 18th. 1808.\nYour letter of the 8th. calling for my attendance as a witness on the trial of Commodore James Barron, has been duly received.\nAltho\u2019 my memory does not apprize me of any circumstance which could be of importance on the trial, I feel every proper obligation to obey the summons transmitted, in behalf of that officer; but the official duties with which I am charged by the President rendering my personal attendance impracticable, leaves no option but that of expressing my readiness to give my testimony by deposition, on notice that it will in that form be accepted. I am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2584", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Monroe, 19 January 1808\nFrom: Monroe, James\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nRichmond Jany. 19. 1808.\nI ought to have answer\u2019d sooner your favor of the 5th., but I have been so unsettled since my return, and so much interrupted that I have equally neglected my friends & my private affairs.\nI have recd. the note for 300. dolrs. wh. I did not wish you to have sent, being altogether ignorant of the claim wh. I have to any sum beyond what I had before recd. This however will be adjusted between us hereafter.\nI have taken a house near Mr. Rutherfords, which is preparing for me, to wh. I expect soon to move. My books and papers are, the greater part, in a Lumber house & not easily to be taken possession of, before I get into my own. As soon as I do I will make the note of papers &ca. which you allude to. Shod. the business press, I will get the better of the obstacle, and immediately furnish the note on being so informed by you.\nMrs. D. Randolph keeps a boarding house & we have taken lodgings with her. Formerly we were not among those whom she visited, and I beleive that more striking proofs of her disregard for me might be furnished, but it is not easy to get accomodations here, and her present distress, is a sufficient motive to forget, what never excited resentment. Mrs. Monroe & my daughter desire their best regards to Mrs. Madison, & I am dear Sir very sincerely yours\nJas. Monroe", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2585", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Henry Rose, 19 January 1808\nFrom: Rose, George Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nWashington, Tuesday, January 19th. 1808.\nMr. Rose will, in conformity to Mr. Madison\u2019s wish, do himself the honor of waiting upon him at the Office of State to-morrow, at one o\u2019Clock.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2586", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Israel Smith, 19 January 1808\nFrom: Smith, Israel\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nWashington Jany. 19th. 1808\nWe take the Liberty to recomend James Witherill Esqr. of Ver, Chief Justice of the County of Rutland in that State as A proper person for a Judge of the Territory of Michigan. He is A man of Talents & Urbanity & will be useful to the Government wherever he is placed. We are very respectfully your very Hble. Servts.\nIsrael Smith\nGideon Olin\nM Lyon", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-21-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2587", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Louis-Marie Turreau de Garambouville, 21 January 1808\nFrom: Turreau de Garambouville, Louis-Marie\nTo: Madison, James\nJeudy 21 jer. 1808.\nLe General Turreau presente Ses devoirs a Monsieur de Madison et Le prie de Luy accorder un quart d\u2019heure d\u2019entretien demain ou Le jour d\u2019apr\u00e8s, soit a L\u2019office de L\u2019etat, soit chez Monsieur de Madison Luy m\u00eame, et a L\u2019heure qui poura Lui Convenir.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-21-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2588", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Charles W. Goldsborough, 21 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Goldsborough, Charles W.\nSir.\nDepartment of State, January 21st. 1808.\nAn unusal pressure of important business on this Department, has delayed the researches necessary to enable me to answer your letter respecting the claim of Mr. Lewis on the French Government. These having made I have now the honor to inform you that it does not appear from Genl. Armstrong\u2019s communications to this Department, what has been done in relation to Mr. Lewis\u2019 claim. I will write to the General again on the subject, and his answer will I hope enable me to give you the information asked for. I am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-22-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2592", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Buckner, 22 January 1808\nFrom: Buckner, William\nTo: Madison, James\nHon,l Sir\nBoon Cty. Kantucky Jany 22: 1808\nFrom our early and long acquaintance I make bold to address you hoping I shall not much intrude on your time and patience while I introduce to your notice a Gent. a friend of mine, living in Lawrenceburg Darbourn Cty Indiana Territory. The Gent. of whom I speak is Elijah Sparks Esqr. Attorney at Law. The presentation I shall give of this Gent. may be depended on. His attatchment to the Constitution and Laws of the Union are Undoubted. His Character stands fair in Society, and under the tongue of good report. His Law information, both in theory and practice is generally said to be such as to claim attention. If you require further information as to the Character, Reputation, and standing in life of the Gent, I refer you to Colo. James Taylor of Newport-Campbell Cty Kantucky, whos report of the Gent. I make no doubt will accord with the Statement I have hear given. As Mr. Sparks was some time a resident of that Town, Colo. Taylor must be well acquainted with him. In consideration of which he is thought to be a person well Qualified to fill the Vacancy in the General Court of the Indiana, occasioned by the death of Judge Davis, especially as Mr. Sparks lives remote from Vincennes at which place (from information) Parties carry maters to a considerable length, and it is thought that an appointment independent of those parties would be most advisable. Believe me Sir I have no other Motive in this business but to endeavour (in throwing in my mite) to servea man of Honour and Respectability. I am with Respect Sir Your Most Obedt. Hble. Servt\nWm. Buckner", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2594", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Fulwar Skipwith, 23 January 1808\nFrom: Skipwith, Fulwar\nTo: Madison, James\n(triplicate)\nSir,\nParis, 23 Jan\u2019y. 1808.\nAnnexed are copies of my two letters to General Armstrong on the subject of two American Ships, the Two Brothers, & the Hyades, captured and brought into Port by French Privateers under the Decree of his Imperial Majesty dated the 17th. Ulto. The General has not favored me with an answer to either of these letters, & probably never will, since his circular letters, even to my Colleagues in France, he has not addressed to me; Still, he may be doing what is necessary with respect to the Captures in question, & this is all, perhaps, that can interest either our Government, or the Individuals concerned. One other Ship the John, or James Adams (for my letters state the names both ways) belonging to Philadela. has been captured & brought into the Port of Dunkerque, and another belonging to New York, the Caliopee, Capt. Taylor, has been seized since her arrival at L\u2019Orient by order of this Government under the same Decree of the 17th. Decr., for having permitted herself to be visited by a British Cruiser. Possibly the fate of these and of all other vessels, that may be captured under similar circumstances may be decided hereafter on principles of Policy, or upon the measures of Congress. Nevertheless it is an important object to have them brought to trial, Should the Government not be induced to release them, by the Council of Prizes, & not by the administrations of Marine of the District in which they are as is most strenuously insisted on by the Captors, who I hear alledge the right of having them adjudged in the Same manner that British vessels are. With the most respectful considerations I am, Sir, Yr. Mt. Obt. St.\nsigned Fulwar Skipwith", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2595", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Shippen, 23 January 1808\nFrom: Shippen, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nPhiladelphia Jany. 23d. 1808\nI had the honor of receiving a line of the 2nd. Current from the Secretary of the Treasury stating the measure of caution that he had adopted in consequence of a report of the Paris Police which had reached your department to the prejudice of Mr. George Howell.\nRespecting our Institutions for the preservation of every right I can not but wish that a fair opportunity may be given to Mr. Howell to repel this injurious report. To this end, it appears to me, but Just, that he should be furnished with the charge against him, & the evidence in its support, as secret declarations & surmises ought not to take away a mans reputation.\nI have known Mr. Howell for near twenty years, & have had transactions with him of great Importance, & can offer him no reproach. He was also Valued by my Son who knew him well. I therefore, cannot think it right, to abandon the principle, that a man is Innocent till the contrary is proved. He has had some enemies, perhaps, in consequence of his misfortunes, but untill some fact is established on contradictory principles, his consideration ought not to be attainted.\nMrs. Shippen & myself are confined to our chamber but join very sincerely in very affectionate salutations & respectful compliments to yourself & Lady.\nW. Shippe", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2596", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Augustus Woodward, 23 January 1808\nFrom: Woodward, Augustus\nTo: Madison, James\nDistrict of Erie, jan. 23, 1808.\nI have the honor to transmit to the Secretary of State the enclosed papers, without any comment. Permit me to subscribe myself Sir, with the highest respect, your obedient servant,\nA. B. Woodward", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2597", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Jonathan Williams, 23 January 1808\nFrom: Williams, Jonathan\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nWashington, January 23 1808.\nThere being now in this City a considerable number of the Members of the United States Military Philosophical Society, I think it my duty in conformity to the 3d Section of the 4th Chapter of the Constitution, to call an occasional meeting to be held at the first apartment on the right hand in the War Office, on Saturday Evening 30 Inst for the purpose of stating to the members, who have not hitherto had an opportunity of meeting the Society, the motives which gave rise to the institution, its object, progress, and present state, together with an account of such communications as have been recently made to it.\nBesides the reasons assigned, which have impelled me to this measure, it will be a circumstance of pride and pleasure to see so many respectable characters assembled, by whose good councils the Society may be directed to such measures as will in future facilitate the collection and dissemination of Military Science; and I hope I may anticipate the satisfaction each member will enjoy by a fraternal interview with his associates. This early notice is given to prevent previous engagement, and I trust that there will be a full and punctual attendance: The Chair will be taken at 7 o\u2019clock precisely. I have the honor to be, Very respectfully, Your most obedient servant,\nJon\u2019. WilliamsPresident U. S. M. P. S.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2598", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James McGreggar, 23 January 1808\nFrom: McGreggar, James\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nSaint Thomas 23d. January 1808\nI wrote you on the 4th. and 6th. Inst. per Schooner Friendship and forwarded Returns of American Vessels, which arrived here previous to the 1st. inst, also the accounts of Money received and expended on account of the United States, with Vouchers for the same.\nIn Mine of the 4th. inst I informed you that the Commercial relations of this Island was to remain upon the same footing as it was previous to the Capture. This Information I had from the Collector, but they have made regulations since, which places the Island in the same situation as other British Colonies.\nI received information on the 18th. inst of an Embargo laid on all American Vessels in the United States by Government and have since received the Act passed 22d. Decr. 1807. I do not Know the intention of Government in passing this Act in its present form, for certain it is, if they wished to prevent the West Indies being furnished with Provisions, it will not have the desired effect; I have heard within these three days of five Vessels arriving in the Islands from America, with Licences. The Brig Sally Captn. Ansdell of and from Phila and two other names unknown have arrived at Antigua, likewise a Schooner name unknown at Porto Rico, and the Schooner Fair American, Clement Master, of and from Georgetown has been sent into Tortola for adjudication.\nIt is not improbable that the Citizens of the United States may be constrained by the Act in its present form they receive advices of the fate of those already sailed and the determination of the British, to capture all vessels, which have not regular Clearances and Papers. However should they adopt a different Policy, and encourage Our Citizens In breaking the Laws of Our Country, and it is the intention of Government to prevent supplies being sent to the West India Islands, I am of opinion, that it will be found necessary to alter or amend the Act, placing Coasting Vessels under the same restrictions as Registered or Sea Letter Vessels.\nIt is reported here that an Embargo has been laid on American Vessels in Barbadoes, and that they will be detained untill orders are received from England to convoy to the United States, lest they should fall into the hands of the French. It is very probable that a similar mode of conduct will be adopted throughout the British Colonies . The Ship Pomona Captain Moses Hoyt, and the Ship John ew Captn. Pride, both of New York, in their passage from Guadaloupe to New York, were captured and sent to Tortola for adjudication.\nI have written my friend William Thornton Esqr requesting him to adjust my Accounts with the United States. I have the Honor to be very respectfully Sir Your Most Obt. St.\nJames McGreggar", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2600", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Robert R. Livingston, 23 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Livingston, Robert R.\nDear Sir\nWashington Jany. 23. 1808\nI have duly recd yours of the 8th. and will pay to it the attention you wish. We expect an opportunity for Genl. Armstrong about the 10th. Feby. The Vessel will sail from N. York. I mention the circumstance as this may convey the information sooner than the newspapers which are to publish it, and as you may be willing to avail yourself of the opportunity for later communications.\nThe Embargo has excited not more complaint than was to be apprehended. The late decrees of G. B. which it anticipated, will probably impose silence in quarters where the measure may still not give satisfaction.\nMr. Rose has been with us some days. No one knows better than yourself, the rule which imposes absolute silence on the subject of what is passing with him. I remain Dr. Sir very respectfully Yr. Obedt. hble Servt.\nJames Madison\nWe have heard nothing from Genl. Armstrong since the arrival of the Revenge.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2601", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Stokely, 24 January 1808\nFrom: Stokely, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nGeorge Town Janr. 24th. 1808\nThat concord may be Preserved amongst the Republicans I do sencearly wish, & I wish you Success in the late nomination, Tho I Frankly confess that my acquaintance with Mr. Monroe had created a Partiality for him in my Breast, but in order to give quietude to the Public confidence in our administration (which Confidence is our main Strenth) I am glad to see such unanimity amongst those who ought best to know the most Suitable Person for to Suceed Mr. Jefferson. I believe Great Britain depends on carrying her Illiberal demands into Effect by the aid of her american friends by our Political divisions & the aversion that our Government has ever displaied, to hostility: but I am glad to find she is like to be disapointed. Unfortunately however for freedom, Powerful Individuals as well as Powerful nations are too apt to Imbrace and maintain Illiberal advantages, over Such as may by accident, or misfortune be, at their mercy. So long as we can maintain a truly republican President, so long we may count on Safety in our Governmt., (but no longer are we Safe) in my humble oppinion, and these Principles of republicanism ought not only be in the heart of a Chief magistrate, but in all his acts too to Prevent Illiberal & unjust Suspicions amongst the Citizens which might be ruinous & Sir as every freeman is Intitled to a Small degree of respect, I take the liberty to make some animadversions on our Present Situation. Has not the conduct of England Since the american Revolution been continually Insulting, towards us, as well as towards the rest of the World. Is not ambition her Guide, & Power the tribunal to which she continually has appealed, and what are we now to Expect. Her Insolence is now highly resented by the Citizens of our Country, & much more so in the Western Country than on the atlantic coasts. (Particularly about Washington & George Town) The embargo law meets the approbation of our Country generally altho it affects some of our Citizens more than an open war would do. Still, It is admited to be a good defencive measure tho it, at present tends to embarras Industry on the Sea coasts, and because there is a Prospect held up by many that its existence will only be of a Short duration, many People Stand as Idle Spectators that otherwise would turn their attention to useful Business, and the fear of a war (which Seems to me almost inevitable) naturally relaxes our Commercial Vigor. And that our Embargo may Produce the desired Effect, viz, hurt Great Britain worse than America. I do think we ought to Prepare for having it continued with the least Possible harm to our own Country, until we have our Grievances fully redressed, or until we Shall find it Suitable to retaliate. At all events I do hope the embargo will be continued & that our Present Position in other respects will be vigerously continued, until we find how the People in England relish it. That Government will be Impeled a Change its tone If we continue to resist & convince them that we are not to be affrighted ought of our natural rights. Its Probabel that, that court, is deceived by their tory friends in our Country and it Behooves us to undeceive them by a Spirited Persevearance in our demands, & in such measures as becomes an Independent & Insulted People. First Let the Subjects of G. Britain feel the Effects of our Embargo, then their Soldiery the Effects of our arms, before we yield an Inch of Privileges. We Can and ought to maintain our Rights, & I trust Since we have Joyned Issue (as the Lawyers say) that our cause will be fairly discusd, that the World may witness the moderation and rectitude of our national Conduct. Our Citizens are ripe for the trial, (Probabelly more so than they might be a year hence). Therefore I do hope that even a disposition to acquiese with any colour of abouse, will not be Showed on our Part at this time, or any thing like forming an alliance with our Assailants; as Either of these things, would be disgusting to mass of the People, in my oppinion, eagerly as some would acquiese with any terms reather than war with England. I am glad to find Public Provisions making for the Sailors. I do conceive it would be Wise Policy to impress the Public mind with an Idea that the embargo is to be continued. It would stimulate our Country to Prepare for the worst, & convince the British that we are not Prepared to Bough down to their Insolence & Tyrany & might materially change the countenance of that nation towards us. I am Sorry to find by Information at the navy office that all the Gun boats are engaged & that not one of them are to be built on Ohio. I am acquaint with several Citizens of that quarter who would Gladly have engaged the Building of Some of them, Some of whom have lately been here for that Purpose. Seeing that those Boats in Part might with Propriety be built on Ohio and that, that country, is as well intitled to Such a Job, as any other & that the work could be done as Cheap there as Else where, & that the Boats could with Grater Safety be taken to their Station from that quarter, than from any other, that country having in Some other Instances conceived themselves to be neglected may again think this Borders on neglect. I am however aware Sir that it is Impossible to Gratify everry man or Everry neighbourhood, with all their desires. Still I think where it can with Propriety & Convenience be done it ought, to be attended to, Particularly at the Extremities of our settlements. In the western Country Cannon Ball & Bomb shells, might also be Procured at a Cheap rate. If we Should be attackd by Britain I conceive N. Orleans will be their first object. I mean to go to West Florida Shortly. I have business that urges me there, and If I can do my country any Service on that route I should with allacrity attend to it.\nSir as the British Court did not hurry itself to attend to Mr. Monroe, and when their Terms were offered they could not be agreed to. Still, as no better could be had, our ministers through Complisance to that Court forwarded their Illiberal Proposals to our Government for Consideration. Therefore I trust that we Shall not after So many Insults, Either for fear of a Continuence of the embargo or of Incuring a war (or of any thing else) Hurry on a treaty even tho it Should have a favourable aspect, but I do hope & trust, that any terms derogatory to Honor or Independence will be Spurn\u2019d at. Our Government consistent with Justice & the will of the People ought to contend for their usual demands, & I do conceive national Honor forbids us to retreat, & requires war reather than a Show of Humility. We are allready reather too much degraded. Even If we had received no Insults from G. Britain, Mr. Rose is only intitled to a Similar treatement with that met by Mr. Monroe in England. And it would Show an unbecoming officiousness in America to offer Mr. Rose any more attention than England has heretofore offerd our ministers and that nation & her friends ought not to Expect any other or Better Treatment unless they expect our country will Humiliate itself to Great Britain. And Sir as we have Britains example and that fortified by their Repeated Insults to Justify, and Support a Procrastination of the treaty and as a few months continuation, in our Present Position, may affoard us material Information, and enable us with more certainty to know what we ought to do (consistent with Policy) as a little time may materially change the aspect of Affairs in England, & while we can Still be fortifying our Ports, & gaining Strenth, at this Particular crisis & under these circumstances Sir, I do Concieve, that time (Industry) & deliberation would comport with Dignity & Sound Policy (on this occasion) in our Government. I am Sir your obdt Humb. Servt.\nJohn Stokely", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2602", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 24 January 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\nprivate\nDear Sir\nLondon Jany. 24. 1808.\nI send you herewith a parcel of Newspapers to which I refer you for the Debates in Parliament and the News of the Day. The able Speech of Ld. Grenville, and the manly & eloquent Protest of Lord Erskine, will give you Pleasure. The speeches of Mr. Wyndham & Mr. Eden in the House of Commons deserve your Attention.\nThe Anxiety which has for some Time past been rapidly increasing relative to the U. S. is now very great and very general. The Belief is every where entertained that we shall be found to have taken a strong Attitude; A Hope is, however, indulged that it will be short of war, and that the Peace of the two Countries may yet be preserved.\nI have not ceased in my Intercourse with all Parties to endeavour to diffuse (without losing Sight of Discretion in the Manner) just Notions as to the Conduct which G. B. ought, in Prudence & in Honor, to have observed towards us. Much Ground has undoubtedly been gained; but, impressively as Events & strong Demonstrations of wide-spread Dissatisfaction here, begin to speak to this Government, I fear it is only from America that it can be completely enlightened. A dignified, firm & temperate Course on our part must soon produce its proper Effect on G. B; &, I should hope, upon France also.\nThe most friendly Dispositions are constantly professed by Ministers; and I am quite sure that they are averse from a War with us. Yet the King\u2019s Speech will satisfy you that there is no present Intention of yielding any thing to our Claims. In their Treatment of myself personally there is every Manifestation of Kindness & Respect for our Country. My Reception on the Birthday, and at Mr. Canning\u2019s Dinner in the Evening, was such as I shd. have had Reason to be perfectly satisfied with at any Time. It has been mentioned to me, however, by a Friend on whom I have great Reliance, that Mister Percival in a late Conversation observed that, altho they did not wish & wd. not seek a War with the U. S., yet that, if we made such a War necessary, they wd. not perhaps much regret it; as a check to our maritime Growth was becoming indispensable.\nI have thought it proper to discourage, by the only prudent Means in my Power, the unnecessary Stay of American Vessels in British Ports, or indeed in Europe; But there are notwithstanding a considerable Number here. To urge their Departure openly wd. have been too strong a Step; but every other Expedient has been tried. I have no immediate Fears for their Safety, but they would be better at Home.\nPrince Stahremberg left England last Week upon very short Notice. It is said that the French Government demanded his Departure before the Meeting of Parliament, & menaced Austria with War if this Demand were not complied with! He appears to have been more earnest in pressing the Mediation of his Court than was pleasing to this Government; and it is known that he went away much dissatisfied. Mr. Alopeus has received his French Passport & will leave us soon. Jacobi has not yet received his.\nSir George Prevost goes out immediately to Halifax as Govr. & Commander in Chief. It is believed to be certain that 5.000 Troops will be sent about the same Time. A Friend (whose Intelligence is from a good Source, but who may have made some Mistake) has assured me that a very large additional Force is in Preparation for the B. Northern Colonies. I suspect he has misunderstood the Conversation which he reports to me; but he speaks with Confidence on the Subject.\nThe late Orders of Council will be assailed in Parliament as Unconstitutional, as well as impolitic & unjust; and a strong Protest will be entered on the Journals of the Lords. I dined Yesterday at Ld. Erskine\u2019s with most of the distinguished members of the Opposition; and I found them agreeing in such a View of this Subject as British Statesmen ought to adopt. The Company consisted of the Duke of Norfolk, Lord Grenville, Earl Grey, Lord Chief Justice Ellenborough, Lord Lauderdale Lord Holland, Lord H. Petty, Mr. Thos. Grenville, Mr. iney, Sir Arthur Pigot, Sir Saml. Romilly, Mr. Adam, Mr. Norris (Lord Erskine\u2019s Son in Law) and myself. The utmost good will towards the United States was shewn by them all. The Duke of Norfolk having compelled me to go first to Dinner, said, as he followed me, that he was happy to have an opportunity of shewing his Respect, not only for my Station, but for the Government and Country I represented. This little Compliment, (in answer to the usual disqualifying Observations on my part) which I would not repeat if it had been personal, may be thought to derive a Value from Circumstances, and from the conspicuous Worth & high Rank & Influence of the Duke of Norfolk and those by whom he was surrounded, which otherwise it certainly wd. not have.\nI believe I have omitted in my former Letters to mention that I was told at Downing Street, some Time since, that Instructions had been sent to Mr. Erskine, by the Packet, upon the Subject of the orders of Council. What was the precise Nature of the Explanations, with which these Instructions have charged him I did not enquire; but from what was stated to me I presumed that they could not be satisfactory.\nI ought to mention that some of the opposition entertain Hopes of producing a Change of Ministry. This is not a Topic, however, upon which at present I can enlarge.\nGenl. Lyman tells me that Discharges of American Seamen are more freely granted now than at any Time heretofore; but I do not know that any Stress ought to be laid on this Circumstance, which is perhaps accidental. I have the Honor to be with unfeigned Attachment Dear Sir, Your most Ob. Servt.\nWm: Pinkney\nPS. Jany 25th. I add to the parcel of newspapers the Morning Chronicle & Times of this Day, in which you will find another Decree of the French Govt. enforcing with new Sanctions & Precautions the Decrees of the 23d. of Novr. & 17. of Decr. last. Spain has echoed the last mentioned Decree. The State of the World is full of Embarrassments for us; but this Consideration shd. only serve to augment our Patriotism & our Firmness. Nothing can better illustrate the Impolicy of the British Orders than these Measures of France & Spain, for which they have furnished a Pretext.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2604", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Albert Gallatin, 25 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Gallatin, Albert\nSir.\nDept: of State. Jan: 25. 1808.\nI have the honor to request that you cause a warrant to be issued in favor of George Dyson, Navy Agent of the United States, at Syracuse, for five thousand, eight hundred and ninety five dollars, payable out of the fund appropriated to Barbary purposes; this being claimed by Mr. Dyson, on account of advances made to the Ex-Bashaw of Tripoli. He will be charged accordingly on the Books of the Treasury, and held accounable. I am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2605", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 25 January 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nLondon Jany. 25th. 1808.\nI have the Honour to transmit Copies of two Communications lately made to me by Mr. Canning, relative to the Affairs of the Union, and a Seaman called Wm. Trisset, together with a Copy of my answer to one of them. I have the honour to be, with the highest Consideration, Sir, your most obedient, Humble Servant,\nWm. Pinkney", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2606", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Richard Taylor, 25 January 1808\nFrom: Taylor, Richard\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nLouisville Kntuckey 25th. of Jany. 1808\nI think it must have been through your means that my son William Obtained his appointment in the Army. I hope Sir you will not think me troublesom when I request you to speak to the Secretary of War for som Commission of higher rank. (I make this request supposeing the army will be Augmented) I think Nature Intended him for the Army. He has a Boddy capable of Induring fatigue & an active mind which pushes him on to gain credit in his profession which he wishes to make the business of his Life & I think understanding is above par. Please give my Comps. to your Lady Unknown & believe me to be with every Centiment of Friendship & Esteem your most Obt. Servt.\nRichd: Taylor", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2607", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Ebenezer Jennings, 25 January 1808\nFrom: Ebenezer Jennings\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nLancaster January 25th. 1808\nThe legislature of Penna: last Session, passed a law authorising the President of the U.S. to lay out and complete a road leading from Fort Cumberland to the Ohio river, so far as said road should be found necessary to pass through this state, on certain conditions expressed therein, constituting the Prest. the Judge, as to the practicalities of complying with those conditions, agreeably to an act of Congress on that subject.\nAnd as the commissioners on the part of the US are proceeding to lay out said road through part of Penna: in such direction, as does not accord with the wishes, and supposed interests of the state, generally, or but very partially, In consequence of which several memorials, to the amount of several hundred Subscribers, have been presented to the Legislature requesting Legislative interference therein.\nThose memorials have been referd to a committee appointed on part of the house of Representatives, And as the legislature have not had any official information, relative to the Presidents final decision or \"opinion\" of the practicability of compliance with the will of the state, as expressed in the conditions of this law, the committee therefore, feeling a great degree of difficulty and embarrassment, how to proceed in making report on said memorial, do through me, as Chairman of the committee, request you to forward, as soon as convenient, An official copy of the Presidents decision in the case, together with the instructions given to the commissioners, if any such final decision or \"opinion\", and instruction, relative to any certain route, so far as regards this state, has been given by the Presidt. of the U States. I have the honor, to be Sir, with Much respect Your Obdt. Servt.\nEbenezer Jennings", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-26-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2609", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Georges F. Favre, Jr., 26 January 1808\nFrom: Favre, Georges F., Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nMonsieur\nComt\u00e9 d\u2019Yberville Territoire d\u2019orl\u00e9ans ce 26e. Janr. 1808\nCraignant de faire des fautes en faisant l\u2019expos\u00e9 cy apr\u00e8s en anglais; Je vous prie de m\u2019excuser, si je m\u2019exprime en fran\u00e7ais\nLes deux ann\u00e9es accord\u00e9es aux bureaux du Gouvernement Espagnole en Louisianne, pour la liquidation de leur affaires \u00e9tant expir\u00e9e, ils furent transport\u00e9s dans la Floride occidentale. Le plus grand nombre des emploi\u00e9s \u00e0 la Cantadorerie du Roy ont rest\u00e9s ont r\u00e9sid\u00e9s d\u00e8s lors \u00e0 Pansacole, et quelques uns au Baton Rouge.\nLors du transport des bureaux en Floride, il restoit un papier monnoie en Lou\u00efsianne d\u00fb par le gouvernement Espagnole connu sous le nom de Certificat ou Livrance pour une Somme de 2,269,041. r\u00e9aux soit $283,630:1l. deux cents quatres-vingt trois mille six cent trente piastres et un r\u00e9al, les quelles livrances \u00e9toient depuis nombre d\u2019ann\u00e9es entre les mains des habitants qui en attendoient journellement le payement.\nEtant connu sous des rapports avantageux \u00e0 la Nlle. orl\u00e9ans Je fus charg\u00e9 l\u2019ann\u00e9e derni\u00e8re, d\u2019aller en Louisianne solliciter le payement d\u2019une partie de livrance appartenant \u00e0 des n\u00e9gociants, et de voir la possibilit\u00e9 de faire payer toutes les livrances en G\u00e9n\u00e9ral.\n\u00c0 mon arriv\u00e9e \u00e0 Pansacole, Don Juan Ventura Morales Intendant par interime, me dit qu\u2019ayant un Sup\u00e9rieur en la personne du Vice Roy du Mexique il \u00e9toit oblig\u00e9 de se conformer \u00e0 ses ordres; qu\u2019il avoit renvoy\u00e9 \u00e0 un temps futur le payement des livrances en Louisianne, que cependant il prendrai sur lui de retirer mes livrances si j\u2019y ajoutoit une pareille somme en argent, qu\u2019il me donnerai pour, des traittes (en Carta de pago) sur son Exelentissimo de Yugaray Capitaine G\u00e9n\u00e9ral vice Roy du Mexique, \u00e0 la somme total des livrances, et de l\u2019argent; en annon\u00e7ant que j\u2019avois fait un pr\u00eat \u00e0 la Caisse Royal, et qu\u2019en cette Consid\u00e9ration on avoit retir\u00e9 mes livrances.\nApr\u00e8s nombre de difficult\u00e9s qui s\u2019\u00e9lev\u00e8rent \u00e0 ce sujet entre l\u2019Intendant et le Contador, Je fus expedi\u00e9, l\u2019argent fut d\u00e9pos\u00e9, et les traittes furent envoy\u00e9es de la Nlle. Orl\u00e9ans \u00e0 la Veracruz o\u00f9 je crois qu\u2019elles ont \u00e9t\u00e9 pay\u00e9es.\nPar une r\u00e9capitulation faite \u00e0 Pansacole au mois de Septembre dernier, il paroissoit que cette mani\u00e8re, & par la vente de quelques terres une Somme de quatre vingt mille piastres environ de la Some primitive des livrances avoient \u00e9t\u00e9 retir\u00e9e. Il en reste probablement pour $200,000. plus ou moins. Nombre d\u2019habitants de ce Territoire \u00e0 qui ces livrances sont du\u00eas depuis sept et huit ans Se trouvent d\u00e8s lors priv\u00e9s de leur Capitaux Ils n\u2019ont pas pu augmenter leur cr\u00e9ance contre le Gouvernement Espagnole en faisant un pr\u00eat; en versant de l\u2019argent dans la Caisse de la Floride Occidentale.\nAujourd\u2019huy, Monsieur, que les nouvelles politiques donnent \u00e0 craindre une rupture entre les Etats Unis, & la France, ce qui probablement entraineroit l\u2019Espagne, J\u2019ai cru de mon devoir de prendre la libert\u00e9 de vous exposer ce que cy dessus, & en attendant mon retour a la Nlle: Orleans, o\u00f9 j\u2019ai l\u2019intention de m\u2019entretenir \u00e0 ce sujet avec le Gouverneur Claiborne de vous prier de solliciter du Gouvernement Espagnole ou l\u2019intervention de son ambassadeur, afin de faire la demande avec succes au Vice Roy du Mexique du montant des livrances ou certificats restant \u00e0 payer en Louisianne, & ceux qui pourroient se trouver dans les territoires, et Etats voisins de nous. Si au milieu de vos grandes occupations vous pouvez, Monsieur, vous occuper de la dette du\u00ea aux habitants de la Louisianne, ils vous en auront une bien grande r\u00e9connoissance J\u2019ai l\u2019honneur d\u2019\u00eatre, Monsieur Votre tr\u00e8s humble & tr\u00e8s ob\u00e9issant serviteur\nGeo: F: Favre Jr", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-26-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2612", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John B. Colvin, 26 January 1808\nFrom: Colvin, John B.\nTo: Madison, James\nHonorable Sir,\nF. Street, Jan. 26. 1808.\nIn my 3d. No. I mean to take a short view of the State of the Nation. The public approbation that has been given to the Administration by citizens, and state legislators in different parts of the Union, will naturally enter into the prospect. May I be so bold, in this case, without wishing to obtrude upon the time which you must devote to the public concerns, as to solicit from you a short memorandum of the legislative addresses and others, as well approbatory of the president\u2019s general good conduct as applausive of the act of Embargo? You will understand me to mean no more than a mere index, without any detail; in order to enable me to perceive at a glance the number of addresses, & the locality of the addressers. If I could receive it by to-morrow or the next day, it would be very acceptable. I am, Sir, with high respect, Yours,\nJ. B. Colvin.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2613", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George William Erving, 27 January 1808\nFrom: Erving, George William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nMadrid January 27th. 1808.\nOn the 6th. Inst. I had the honor to transmit to you a copy of the decree issued by this Government on the 3rd., to the same purport of that published at Milan by the Emperor of France on the 17th. December, professing to render more efficacious & extensive the measures which had been previously taken for the blockade of the British Isles.\nIn a note to Mr. Cevallos of the 8th. Inst., acknowledging the receipt of his communication on this subject, I asked for such explanations as the matter seemed immediately to require, & as I judged would be expected by the President: To which not having received a reply, & finding by the reports from several of our Consuls, that the Corsairs & administrations at the ports, had interpreted the decree unfavorably, & had commenced to carry it into rigid operation against our Commerce; it has seemed necessary again to address the Minister; copy of those two notes (Nos. 1. & 6.) are herewith inclosed.\nNos. 2. & 3. of the accompanying copies, are Mr. Cevallos\u2019s note of the 10th. & mine of the 14th. Inst: They respect an embargo which had been laid on the vessels of France & its allies: As the measure was not general, I have confined myself to merely acknowledging the communication.\nNo. 4. is a Representation I made on the 16th. Inst. of a very extraordinary proceeding at St. Sebastian, where the papers of several vessels have been seized; The motive to which, as I am led to conclude by an American Citizen there, who has transmitted the information, is a suspicion that some of those vessels may have been boarded by the English.\nI have from time to time submitted to you copies of all the important correspondence with the Minister of State upon the case of the \"Rebecca, Nimmo\"; the Representations made against the Auditor of Marine at Algeciras, on account of his conduct in that case: and against the proceedings in general, of that Tribunal. You will have observed, Sir, that in consequence of those representations, the Auditor in question was suspended, & that the Council of was directed to enquire into the matter of complaint; this together with all other business relating to the prize Courts, was transferred to the Almirantazgo, which after a very long delay, tho\u2019, as I believe, having made little or no examination into the matter, has determined that there does not exist any proof of the corrupt practises with which the Auditor has been charged, & therefore that he shall be reinstated in his office. This judgement has been communicated to me by Mr. Cevallos in a note of the 19th. Inst., copy of which (No. 5.) is herewith inclosed. It appears that the persons whom I indicated to Mr. Cevallos as evidences to support the facts alledged; as was forseen, have declined to give testimony; that the Government have not used the means in its power to compel a compliance with its citation, as was required; that this reluctance, to appear on the part of the individuals, is construed favorably for the Auditor, and that similar conclusions are drawn from his Serene Highness\u2019s approval of the sentences of the inferior Tribunal; the injustice as well as corruption of which, motived more Representations!!!\nThe number of french troops in this Country is continually augmenting; hitherto they have all arrived by way of Bayonne, & the most advanced post is actually at Validolid; but a very considerable army is also entering by way of Perpignan, & it is generally understood that the ports of Spain are to be occupied by them: it is manifest however, that the entire object of the Emperor has not been explained to this Government, since it cannot, & scarcely pretends to conceal, certain apprehensions which those movements, naturally enough, give rise to; and which many concurrent circumstances tend also to countenance. These however do not beget any concern amongst the people in general, who seem to attend whatever change may happen in their situation, to say the least, with much indifference; & as to a very considerable portion of them, certainly, with rather complacency. I have the honor to be with the most perfect Consideration & Respect, Sir, Your very obedient Servant.\nGeorge W Erving\nP. S. I inclose also copy of an indorsement, made by a British ship of war, on the papers of an American Vessel lately arrived in Spain.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2614", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Lee, 27 January 1808\nFrom: Lee, William\nTo: Madison, James\n(triplicate)\nSir!\nBordeaux Jany. 27th. 1808\nI beg leave to transmit to you an extract of a letter I have this day received from General Armstrong under date of the 22nd inst. in answer to letters I had written him respecting the seizure of several of our vessels, and the captures of others particularized in my respects to you of the 6th and 16th which went by triplicates.\n\"I have assurances that the capture of our vessels under the decree of of the 17th December, like those under that of 20 November 1806 will operate only as detentions, but this entre nous. If you have an opportunity of writing to America you may mention it, and the further circumstance that the negociation thro\u2019 Austria has failed.\"\nI have the honor to remain Your obt. Servt.\nWm Lee", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2615", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Kirkpatrick, 27 January 1808\nFrom: Kirkpatrick, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nMalaga 27. Jany. 1808\nI had last the honor of addressing you on the 5. inst, and find myself since deprived of any Letters from your department\nI now beg leave to wait on you with the return of arrivals at this Port, from the 1st: July, \u2019till the end of the Year, in conformity to your directions.\nThe late Orders and Decrees of the belligerent Powers, have completely put a stop to the arrival of American Vessels in this Port. It is almost impossible any can escape being boarded by the numberless British Cruisers, and I understand several under that predicament have been carried into Algeceras, where their fate is not yet decided. None have been brought in here, or detained on arrival. I am very respectfully Sir Your most Ob hble. Servt.\nWillm: Kirkpatrick", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2616", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Edward Caffarena, 27 January 1808\nFrom: Caffarena, Edward\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nGenoa 27th. Jany. 1808.\nI had the honor of presenting you my respects the 7th. November last as per Triplicate here inclosed, which I confirm and now transmit the usual list of arrivals at this Port within the last Six months of 1807 only amounting to two Vessels.\nThe many condemnations of American Ships and Cargo\u2019s by the English at Malta, and the hostilities lately committed by the Algerines against the flag of the United States have been the cause of a quantity of American Seamen coming to this place in the greatest distress. I have taken proper care of them and had them safely convey\u2019d to Marseilles and Bordeaux to get a passage home.\nThe late Imperial Decrees will very much prejudice the American Trade in these parts as all property is become liable to the most unaccountable effects of incidency. A Cargo of fish which came in here last week by the Hope Capn. Stevens has been sequester\u2019d till proper proofs are obtained of the Vessel not proceeding from an English port, nor having been visited by any British Cruizers. Two Cargos at Marseilles, one of Fish from Boston, and another of Colonial produce having been visited by English Ships of war have been confiscated. Two American Vessels at Leghorn with rich Cargo\u2019s of Colonial produce have been unloaded and the goods put into Government Storehouses till they can be proved clear of all Suspicions. The Hope Capn. Braidy with a rich Cargo from Philadelphia to Leghorn has been carried into Gulph Spezia by a French Privateer. I have sent there a person of confidence to afford the Captain every assistance he may stand in need of. In these disagreeable circumstances you may rely Sir on my doing every thing in my power for the support of American Interest at this place. I have already had the satisfaction of receiving the approbation of the Minister of the United States at Paris for my exertions till now, and as I do not suppose there can be any probability of Mr. Kuhn\u2019s ever returning here may I venture to hope Sir that you may not consider me unworthy of being preferably continued by His Excellency the President in the honorable Charge of this Consulate? I can assure you Sir, that my conduct will always be such as to render me deserving of your patronage and shall sieze with eagerness every opportunity to convince you thereof. I have the honor to be with the most profound respect Sir Your most Obedient and most humble Servant\nEdward Caffarena\nP:S: I am happy Sir to inform you that since the above I have obtained the release of the Cargo of Fish by the Hope Cap Stevens, and flatter myself to be equally successful for the Hope Capn. Braidy.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2617", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Francis J. Le Breton Dorgenoy, 27 January 1808\nFrom: Dorgenoy, Francis J. Le Breton\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nNew Orleans the 27th. of January 1808.\nThe honor of your letter Dated November 30th. was handed to me by the Governor of the territory, on the 25th. January at about nine oClock in the morning, and immediately in Pursuance of the orders of the President Proceeded to the Bature in front of the suburb St. mary and in my official caracter Ordered away Sundry Persons whom I found labouring thereon and which Persons I know had commenced work and a taken Possession Subsequent to the third of march in the year 1807. The Persons promptly obeyed and I had supposed the business was finished but in about one hour afterwards being informed that the labourers had returned, I again went to the bature and commanded them to quit and abandon the same, when the Driver or the Person who had the Charge of the work, told me that he had received a command from Edward livingston, attorney at law (who was said to be the Proprietor) not to Give up the bature untill an adequate for by Congress. to wherefore at four o clock in the afternoon I went accompanied By a Number of Good Citizens as the Posse comitatus or The Civil Power of the Territory, and Did Compell The labourers to retire, and in so Doing, I have obeyed the Orders of the President of the united States. I Pray you, Sir, to assure the President of my great veneration and attachement for his Person and that I am entirely Devoted to the Government of the united States. I have the honour to be with the highest respect and Consideration Sir, your most Obedient and humble servant\nF J Le Breton Dorgenoycipher marshal for the District of orleans", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2618", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Turell Tufts, 28 January 1808\nFrom: Tufts, Turell\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nSurinam 28 Jany. 1808\nThe Barque Pacific being under way I have rowed on board to inform you that the Mail Boat has this moment arrived from Barbados & brought papers & Letters that 30 (exactly) American Vessells are Embargoed there, and all others that arrive there will be Embargoed, as retaliative of the Embargo in the United States. I am in doubt whether this Vessel I am on board of, will not be Stopped. If not, this will probably be the only Information you will receive of the Embargo at Bds. as from the politics of the Govt. here, it will probably follow the Conduct of Barbados. I will add that the Embargo at Bds is ordered only with the view of detaining the Provisions there. Yet, it is probable it will be Continued, in Consequence of circumstances that most probably will follow. If this Vessell is not stopped she is probably the last that will be Permitted until an Mail Boat Arrives from Barbados with advice on the subject as that is Head Quarters. The News here is certain that the Danish & Swedish Islands are taken by the British, & that Russia & Sweden have declared war against England. Of these facts you may depend. This Colony is furnished with Fish of All sorts for 6 months. In regard to Flour & Salt Provisions, not 3 months. Though Engld is probably able to furnish the Salt provisions, she cannot the Flour. I have not time to add, More than wishing Success to our Country whatever may be the issue of the Embargo Peace or War. Most Respectfully\nT. TuftsConsul USA", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2619", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Lenox, 28 January 1808\nFrom: Lenox, James\nTo: Madison, James\nDear sir,\nQueen Anns. state of Maryland January 28, 1808\nI hope your goodness will excuse me for the liberty I have taken, When the subject I have written on shall appear in its true Colours. Its true I have lived much Retird since the Revolution and have but a small acquaintance with Any of the gentlemen who Compose the present Administration of our goverment. Colo W Reid who is a sinator is and old friend And Acquaintance of mine ever since the war with Great brittan, Whose politics I Admire And should it hapen in the way, woud thank you to give my Compliments to the old Sittazen. I will now return to the intended subject. I have seen it mentioned in sevral of the news papers, that there would be no division among the republicans, on the next presidential election, and I heartily wish I Could see it in the same point of view, but I Confess I do not. As Republicans yourself the Vicepresindent and Mr. Munroe is spoken off, all of which have their favourits in this Country, and if no Accomodation Can be made I fear those of oppasitt politics may get some advantage by it. In this part of this state we say Mr Clinton is too old, and we fear Mr. Munroe has been too long in London, and altho insinceable of it, may be more or less Contaminated, which I hope is not the Case, but experience has given cause to guard against those things. Of Course yourself appear to be the general wish of the people in those parts Should it be Convenient and Consistant with the delicate Sittuation in which you stand, I should be much Gratified and particularly obliged in Receiving afew Lines from you on this subject, but if inconvenient be so good as to let me Know you Recd. those lines Its true I am a stranger to you and perhaps alway may be, but I have long been Acquainted with you By the hearing of the ear, Who as a statesman and politician I am much pleased with, and hope you will be seated in the presidential Chair, When the present old Sage Retires. Again I woud just Remark Genl Wilkinson has been the subject of much conversation amoung us here, in which we all agree in Case of a War he will not Answer for the Commander in Chief, be he ever so innocent of the Charges against him. I now Conclude. May I not be Disapointed, And may you sir live to good old age finish your days as a Statesman & Christian is the wish of your most humble & obedient Servt.\nJames Lenox", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2621", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Jacob Wagner, 28 January 1808\nFrom: Wagner, Jacob\nTo: Madison, James\nDr. Sir\nBalte. 20 Jany. 1808\nThe President\u2019s message in answer to the call of the House respecting Genl Wilkinson has condescended to notice me. It is expressed in such a manner as not to leave it altogether certain, whether it does not hold me accountable for a bundle of Mr. Clark\u2019s papers, before the public. On the one hand I place a value upon a good name, and on the other am elevated above much anxiety, by the consciousness of having merited no such imputation, as may, in the present season of suspicion, be derived from the circumstances mentioned and omitted in relation to those papers; it would nevertheless give me pleasure to hear that they have been found or otherwise accounted for. To Mr. Brent, whose Statement of your recollection differs somewhat from the message, I readily answered on the day I received his letter, that tho\u2019 I was not certain, I thought the papers had not been burnt. At the present moment my recollection is Strengthened, that it is improbable they were all burnt, if any were. With much respect, I have the honor to remain, Dr Sir, Your ob. Servt.\nJacob Wagner", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2622", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Steptoe Washington, 29 January 1808\nFrom: Washington, George Steptoe\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nHare Wood Jany. 29th. 1808\nYour letter of the 11th. int. did not get here, in consequence of some interruption to the post, untill last wednesday. By it were recd. a check for $ 90, on the office of discount and deposit in full discharge of interest to this date, also papers, the Register & for all wh. accept my thanks. The check answers my purposes equally with the cash. I have been exceedingly sorry not to have been enabled to encrease the sum now in your hands. My collections have hitherto been so inconsiderable that I have been ashamed to forward them to you If not disappointed, I expect to make a considerable addition shortly. I wish I were enabled to point out the day. You may however depend upon having the monies as I get them in, and that no exertion shall be wanting to effect this, for in the precarious state of my health, I regard few things more, than, the Condensing into the hands of a friend, the whole of my property of this description. This, tho\u2019 much wished, is, however, not immediately practicable.\nBy the Norfolk ledger I discover that the 74 (Sir Thomas Hardy) entered our waters with a view to dispatches from the Statira and that she immediately after withdrew. Mr. Rose I also see has got to the city. We anticipate the most pleasing result from the arrival of this minister and only fear that his instructions will not be found sufficient to embrace all the points of difference between us. The embargo but this, and even more, we are prepared to bear, should circumstances make further privations necessary.\nThis measure appears to me to be peculiarly appropriate at the present juncture, because, in tendency, pacific, impartially operating on all the nations of the Earth, and whilst it s the temptation to war by withdrawing the immense floating capital of our Citizens from the Ocean, and is calculated to remove much of that erroneous impression, (in its continuance) wh. the delusive falsities of Cobbet and others are so generally fitted to engender in the minds of Britons, respecting the American character; locks up in the bosom of our Country those very means wh. war (if it unfortunately comes) will require. Complaints are always heard, and will increase, from various quarters and classes, but I feel satisfyed, that the sound, and the reflecting part, of the community, will extend to this measure, a very general approbation. With affect. rememes. to Mrs. Madison I remain Dr. Sir very sincerely yr. friend and oblig. Hum Sert.\nGeorge S. Washington", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2623", "content": "Title: From James Madison to John George Jackson, 29 January 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Jackson, John George\nMy dear Sir\nYour letters by the mail of last night, & the preceding week recd. at the same time, have relieved us in some degree from the distress produced by that of anterior date; but still leave us full of anxiety. We sympathize most truly with your griefs, and trust you will be able to do so with our hopes. Mrs. M. writes a few lines which I inclose. I have nothing to say as to news. Rose has been with us some little time; but the rule which I need not explain, applied to such cases, imposes silence in the present stage of the business of his mission. Yrs. with affecte. wishes for Mrs. J. & yourself\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2624", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George William Erving, 29 January 1808\nFrom: Erving, George William\nTo: Madison, James\nNo. 31Private\nDear Sir\nMadrid Jany 29t. 1808\nMy last unofficial letter was of the 6. Inst. I have not any thing at present very particular to add to that, & what else I have lately written. Every movement of the french Emperor seems to add to the apprehensions which prevail here; & every movement renders any plan which may have been heretofore contemplated for counteracting his views, more & more desperate. They are brought into the predicament which was Easily to have been anticipated for a govt. so managed; one where there is neither talents, Energy, nor good faith; now, all is apprehension, & uncertainty. The wedge was regularly inserted under plea of invading Portugal; that object effected, pretexts have been made use of, but no clear & satisfactory Explanations have been given: The ports of Spain are to be occupied; but it does not appear that Spain was asked for or wants troops for that purpose: as to the plan of attacking Gibraltar that begins to be considered as absurd: as a plea it is no longer necessary: Every thing that had been calculated to inspire confidence, such as the allottment of the Queen of Etruria; the Prince of peace, & the marriage, is in a state of entire suspension.\nAs to our relations with this country, it is to be hoped that they will be improved by an increase of the influence of France; they cannot well deteriorate. I have transmitted Regularly my correspondence with Mr Cevallos, because from that you woud form the most correct judgement; & I coud not presume that you woud depend upon mine without an Examination of the detail.\nThe State prisoners still Remain in confinement & apparently the process is continuing; but I know from the very best authority, that in fact it has concluded, that at first the kings fiscal declared that he coud not find in the matter Submitted to him any ground of accusation; but that he was afterwards induced to found a charge upon some Roman law (it is to be presumed in the times of Tiberius, Caligula or Nero) which constituted a conspiracy against the monarchs favorite, a high crime against the state; or upon some antient Castilian process of the same kind: be this as it may, the judges (men selected by the court) tho willing to allow that a horse might be a very fit consul, have in this Case unanimously decided in favor of the prisoners: this is not satisfactory therefore publication of the proceeding the Court does not take the summary course which it probably woud have taken under the same circumstances two years ago tho\u2019 if events of higher importance admit, it will still take it. Dear Sir with perfect Respect & Esteem your very obliged & obedt. St.\nGeorge W Erving\nP S. Neither the proceedings or the Opinion of the Judges will be published; A Royal order will issue in a few days under which the Duke of Infantado will be banished 60 leagues from Madrid; The Duke will lose his rank of general & his place as Chamberlain.\nGWE", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2627", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Henry Lee, 29 January 1808\nFrom: Lee, Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nSunday evening. ca. January 29, 1808\nI was as far as G town on my way to Alexa. this morning when I recd. several letters, all of which but one from Shirley, regarded only you & our country. One letr. treated cheifly of our differences with England, especially of the late decree, & contains in my judgement, some ideas worthy of consideration. This induces me to write to you, which I do with concern, as I well know the fullness of yr. occupation & really too, fear you do not take in yr. customary good part the frank observations which I sometimes make. You ought to be sure that I have but one object, the public good.\nNo private view can possibly attach to them, unless it is coupled with success to yr. election, & this I wish only because I beleive it will promote national happiness, for I am sure it will diminish yr. stock of personal felicity.\nYou have been uniformly told by me that the embargo long continued will destroy all who maintain it. Every day confirms this opinion. Time only can decide. If it turns out as I fear our government will be placed in the hands of a man whose administration will be woeful.\nThe scum of this nation & the outcasts of foreign nations will be the ruling interest & intolerance the most persecuting, will be the daily practice. Geographical partys will in the four years be formed, Seat of govt in spite of all the sanctions of law & use will be removed & the bands of union will be first loosened & then dissolved. You can avert this catastrophe & you only. Hasten the restoration of each mans property to his own enjoyment & all things will go right, our gloomy prospect will be dissipated, & we shall grow in strength, in union, & in happiness.\nMy correspondent considers the late british decree as forming the only serious difficulty in the way, he supposes the affront will be settled by Mr Rose, that the negotiation will be resumed in England, that the impressment of seamen will be satisfactorily arranged, but that the English & French decrees will remain. The latter he views as you do, equally wrong in principle, but not very injurious in practice, whereas that of England is not only wrong in principle, but distressing in operation. He considers too that it would be ignominious in us to sanction their imposition of duty, by availing ourselves of what they term \"relaxation\". Nevertheless he is of opinion that this difficulty may be surmounted by a law denying the right & forbidding the american merchant to avail himself of it. The various islands interspersed along the coast of the continent of Europe will admit an abundance of avenues for the introduction of our produce into the continent, which will be certainly used by our merchants left to their own enterprize & management. He thinks this commerce will be considerable, & he states all the former commerce enjoyed by us in Asia & Africa to be open to us. He thence concludes that we ought not to destroy ourselves by a policy fatal to our industry & pregnant with other evils which vitally affect our national happiness. Having given to you the essence of the letr I stop.\nYou will see in the national Intelligencer tomorrow the protest, which was called pamphlet by my informer. Have you heard of the Lancaster caucus, & do you know two deputys are in town from Richmond on a visit to the VP\nPermit me to take the liberty of saying that as you have consented to be put up as the next C Magistrate of the US. however you personally disregard success, you owe it to yr. numerous & honorable friends to take care that you do succeed, limiting that care, as you will ever do, by those obligations which truth & honor impose. I send you a Sample of the manner in which the freinds of Col. M conduct the contest in Virginia.\nAlso a washington federalist which Contains an essay by a citizen of the U States worthy of yr. perusal.\nExcuse my importunity to place before in yr. hands information. Yrs. ever\nH L", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2628", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Joseph Warner Rose, 29 January 1808\nFrom: Rose, Joseph Warner\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nAntigua 29th. January 1808\nI had the pleasure of addressing you the 13th. Instant and I now beg leave to inform you that Sir Alexander Cochranes orders, to the different Ships of War are to order off all Americans from the Islands of Guadeloupe and Martinique, and two Vessels have Arrived here with their Registers Indorsed one bound to the former the other to the latter Port. For what purpose it is not yet ascertained without it is a misconstruction of His Britannic Majesty\u2019s Order of the 11th. Novr. I have further to add that the Commander in Chief for the time being of the Island of Barbadoes has ordered an Embargo on all Americans in that Port, but I presume only on those Vessels that have Provisions fearful that the Act of Congress of the 22nd Ulto (which has just reached me) might deprive them of American Provisions.\nThe Act of Congress has not had the desired effect in all Cases as several Vessels have arrived in the different Islands with the Coasting Licences and reported their Vessels in distress having been blown off the Coast.\nI have not the smallest doubt that this has been discovered by the different Collectors and report has been made accordingly I have the Honor to be Sir Your Obdt. Servt.\nJoseph Warner Rose", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2629", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Jarvis, 29 January 1808\nFrom: Jarvis, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nLisbon 29th. Jany: 1808\nThe last letter I had the honor to address to you was dated a copy of which, with the duplicates of such letters as copies only were before sent on will accompany it.\nI was the other day told that the Prince Regent, although much alarmed at the advice of the entry of the French into Portugal, did not absolutely determine to leave the Kingdom, untill a Minoteur, I think of the 3rd. Novr. was shewn to him by the Marquis of Billas, in which was an observation to the effect that the House of Braganza should become extinct in Europe. A report of the kind was in general circulation about the time. A report of this kind was in general circulation about the time; but as I did not see that paper & it did not appear to come from any quarter on which much reliance could be placed, I set it down as one of the idle reports of the day, hardly worth troubling you with untill I was a few days ago assured of its authenticity by a Gentleman whose connection with persons in the palace afforded him opportunities of Knowing. Every thing, as formerly observed, indicated that the resolution to go was sudden & unexpected. This may fairly be inferred, notwithstanding the preparation of the fleet, from the Prince Regent & Royal family, Ministers & Nobility, having left in their Palaces all their supp & rich furniture, pictures, libraries, carriages, horses & servants so that externally & internally (at least of several I have been in) they are precisely as when the former Masters were here, with the exception of some french Soldiers standing Centinel before the doors of those now occupied by the French Generals. In the Queens palace there was found about sixty thousand Crowns in silver Coin, besides many of her valuable Jewells; and in one of the Royal deposits, about two thousand pound weight of Church plate ready packed up for embarking which is now turned into Coin.\nIt is not yet positively known, whether the Prince Regent has gone to the Brazils or to England, but the general opinion is to the Brazils, which is corroborated by all the information which has been obtained here regarding the fleet.\nEvery thing remains perfectly quiet here, although Commerce manufactures & municipal industry are at an end. Since the Departure of the Prince it is estimated that about twenty thousand inhabitants have left the City & gone to the Country; and that from this cause together with the want of money to purchase it, the consumption of bread for the inhabitants of the City has lessened one third part. That the emigration has been great, there can be no doubt from the innumerable advertisements on the Houses of their being to Let. Whilst the Country remained Neuter no such thing was to be seen. New houses were starting up as by enchantment & yet it was with the utmost difficulty that Houses could be obtained. Now every new building is stopped, rents have generally fallen to one half & no tenants offer. At a time too when the labour of the farmer is more needed than ever, its paralising effects have extended to the Country; the husbandman seems disheartened & more inclined to give up his farm than to continue his labour, although his very existence depends on it. Real estate in the Country has also fallen very much. This is a sad reverse for so short a time, but it is only the forerunner of the misery & want the Country is likely to experience should a general Peace be very remote. When I reflect on this change it gives rise to a fervent wish for the tranquility & peace of my Country. I have seen enought of the consequences of War, in a short space, where I am, not to prefer peace at a considerable Sacrifice, rather than that its destructive hand should ever touch the land of my nativity, but if the pride & interested policy of Gt Britain will not suffer us to remain quiet, as an individual I must repine, but I should prefer defensive to offensive measures as more effectually striking at the Source of her power & as less expensive to ourselves: but if the wisdom of Government should decide both the one & the other the most adviseable, I am satisfied that my fellow Citizens will act with the spirit & resolution of Men and will teach our enemies that we have the power & the courage to retort upon them the evils they seem so well disposed to inflict on us.\nFour thousand French troops more entered this Country only a few days since. There are between 27 & 30.000. Only the Provinces of Estremadura, Minha Duoro & Beira are in the possession of the French; the rest of Portugal is in the hands of the Spaniards, who decline receiving any orders from the French General in Chief.\nBy the last letters from Barcelona of the 14th. instant the ex-Queen of Etruria was shortly expected there. She was to enter that Kingdom as infanta of Spain. A number of french troops had reached Segovia; and as many had entered & were expected, as it was beleived would occupy all the Sea ports of Spain. There is little talk now of the marriage of the Prince of Asturies with a Mademoiselle de Tacher. Assuring you of my most entire Respect I have the honor to be Sir Yr. Mo. Ob. Sert.\nWilliam Jarvis\nP. S. I have this moment learnt that a Courier arrived the last evening confirming Genl. Junot, Genl. in Chief of Portugal, & that the Spanish Generals are in future to receive instructions from him.\nIt is said that another contribution of four million of cru or two million of dollars is shortly to be levied.\nThe President of the Junta of Commerce has just now acquainted me that the affair of the Schooner Captn. Asa Hooper was again decided in favour of the vessel, which I trust will enable Captn Hooper to obtain about 1500 $ which he has been kept out of for seven or eight years.\nI have Sold a large Cargo of flour belonging to Messrs. Joseph Lewis & Co. and Mordecai & Saml Lewis of Philada. at the net price, clear of all charges, of $14 P barl., including some small benefit of Exchanges, & am happy to say, that the French Government, who were the purchasers, have paid me with the utmost punctuality.\nFrom the present appearances of European affairs & of Portugal in particular, I am persuaded that the Commerce of the United States to this Country will be daily lessening. France can & doubtless will supply the wants of Portugal with Grain; which now employs by much the largest part of the capital of our Citizens engaged in the Commerce between the two Countries. The demand of Portugal for Bread will daily be lessening from the great number of artizans & Merchants which are likely to emigrate to the Brazils & from the encouragement which will doubtless be given to cultivate grain instead of the vine, with a view to open another channel to the vent of French Wines. Necessity too, will drive those who may remain to consume the smallest possible quantity which will serve for human Subsistence, for the Source from whence Portugal drew her riches being now cut off, & she having but few or no internal resources, she will not have the means of paying for more foreign productions & manufactures than are indispensibly necessary for her consumption, if so much. These considerations, with that of the property which my industry & close application to business has enabled me to gain not being adequate to maintain me without business, I should prefer a Consulate in the Brazils, which presents the prospect of considerable Commerce with the United States, to my present Situation. Rio Janiero, St. Salvador (or as it is commonly called, Bahia & is in the Bay of all Saints) or Pernambuco are the posts which at this time offer the greatest advantages in a Commercial point of view, and to one of which I must take the liberty to Solicit the President for the appointment of Consul. But as that Country may be deemed of sufficient importance to have a commissioned Charge d\u2019Affaires, who is a Man of considerable Talents & of an agreeable address, & who will not be personally engaged in Commerce & on whom Govmt. may also think it adviseable to confer the title of Consul General, I shall give up all thoughts of Rio Janiero as the Seat of Govmt. & confine my Solicitations particularly to Bahia (i. e. St. Salvador), and in the last resort to Pernambuco. In soliciting this office, I shall not venture to urge in my behalf the success that may have followed my official applications, although perhaps not much inferior to what was experienced by the two Ministers at this Court under the late Presidents, as I am sensible that it has been principally owing to the influence of the Presidents wise & steady Administration; and, had it been more personal, I should have no other claim than that of having done my duty. It may not however be amiss here to observe, that what has been effected through my instrumentality has been accomplished by fair & direct representation, in which I pretend to no other merit than that of having been faithful to my trust as a public officer, of having a desire to act in correspondence with the views of Government, and that of having done all in my power to promote the interest of my Country & Countrymen: and I think I can with propriety add, that my conduct as a Man has been as correct, moral & honorable as commonly falls to the share of human nature. I think too I may with justice say that from the civility I have always experienced from the late Ministry, I presume that my appointment will be perfectly Satisfactory to the Prince Regents Government. Should any doubts be entertained as to the propriety of an immediate appointment of Officers to that Country, on a supposition of the return of the Prince Regent, or for want of due Official Notice, and the President does not disapprove of my application, I hope Government will do me the honor to remember me when the doubts are cleared away. Respectfully \nW Jarvis", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2630", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Turell Tufts, 29 January 1808\nFrom: Tufts, Turell\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nSurinam 29 Jany. 1808.\nLast evening the Mail Boat arrived from Barbados bringing positive accounts of an Embargo in the UStates, and also of one on all Amer: Vessels at Bds. The paper which Contains it I herewith transmit. The Barque Pacific of Salem being ready for Sea, I went on board & urged her immediately departure in expectation that she might be detained: and in the utmost haste I wrote a few lines to You Containing that intelligence. The Vessel got off, and this morning it is not positively said that any Embargo will take place here, unless so far as to stop American Vessells that may arrive from going elsewhere. Another Vessel being ready, I am urging the Capt to depart and I hope she will bring you this safe. Seven Vessels remain People here are excessively anxious about the part our Country will take, & I answer them, Neither! unless War is declared against the UStates. Here is Fish enough for 6 months provision. Of Flour there is not enough for 3 months. I am respectfully Yr obtservant\nT. Tufts", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-30-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2631", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Robert Taylor, 30 January 1808\nFrom: Taylor, Robert\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nRichmond. Jany 30th. 1808\nYours of the 26th. inst: was yesterday received and this morning I made enquiry into the subject and find that the sum mentioned in the notice is due at all events -- in consequence therefore of your request have paid for you the sum of fifty one dollars sixty two cents being the principal with interest, and for the notice and now inclose you the proper certificate. I took the liberty of inclosing to your care the last week some letters for Henry Buckley in Ireland or England and hope the circumstances of intercourse will plead my excuse for the trouble imposed on you -- they are important as they contain triplicates of a bill of exchange -- in your answer to this be pleased to say whether you received it. We hope here that the affair of Russia will be favourable in the negociation. Yrs aftely\nRobert Taylor", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-30-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2632", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Joseph Stanton, 30 January 1808\nFrom: Stanton, Joseph\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nCharlestown Janry. 30th. 1808\nAt this Important Crisis, When Our all is at Stake, It affords Consolation That we have (not to mention Talents) Characters at the Helmn In Whome we may place the Utmost Confidence, men of Tried Patriotism who possess Cool heads & Warm Hearts. The Tamany Society in their excellent Address to the President Spoke the Sentiments of my heart far Better than I Could have expressed them my Self; But Notwithstanding the Numerous unprovoked Insults that have Been heaped upon us, I wish for peace with all the World, if the terms are Honl. to Our National Character. Sir If the President declines Standing a Candidate in future I Sincerely hope James Madison Esqr. will be the Successful Candidate for the Chair. Our former Electors Will no doubt be reelected. Two of them I Saw the Other day & Know their Sentiments to be Consonant to my Wishes. Our electors will not be divided, I am Confident. I am Intimatly acquainted with them all. Govr. Monroe is a fine Character, but John Randolphs Anxiety in my Opinion is Sufficient to damn him He is a Complete Slave to Caprice and ambition. I am With High Consideration yours Very Truly\nJos. Stanton\nP S my Best Respects to the Truly Amiable Mrs Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "01-30-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2633", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Larkin Smith, 30 January 1808\nFrom: Smith, Larkin\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nCollectors office Norfolk Jany 30th. 1808\nThe Triumph a British ship of War left the waters of the Chesapeak yesterday. I have the honor to be Sir with great respect yr. Obt. Servant\nLarkin Smith", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2634", "content": "Title: JM Memorandum on Chesapeake and on the Embargo, February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: \nFebruary 1808\nGenerl. & mutual reasons vs war -- internal business &c &c\nWith these views U. S. desired to settle evy thing\nUnion of Imprests. & Chesapeake favorable thereto, & particularly latter\nSeparation yielded, to the views taken of the subject by G. B. & to his mission\nSurprize at; at splitting the Case of Chesapeak, entirely, Status quo. Talk: No Proclamation. Precaution, vs. other wrongs, prior & sub: to Chesapa:\nBradley, Whitby, Love, French ship burnt. Dougls. seizs. at Norflk Continual disobedce. to Procln.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2635", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Fulwar Skipwith, 1 February 1808\nFrom: Skipwith, Fulwar\nTo: Madison, James\nTriplicate.\nSir,\nParis 1 Feby: 1808.\nIn company with this I have the honor to send a copy of my letter to you of the 23d: Ulto., and at foot are annexed two informal copies of letters from his Excellency the Minister of Marine to the maritime Prefect at l\u2019Orient for his Government in the Case of the Caliope, Capt. Taylor, mentioned in my aforesaid Duplicate. These copies were obtained by me in an un official form, & from a private hand, but, nevertheless, are genuine copies of the originals, and are of importance enough to be communicated, in as much as they tend to dissipate the uncertainty, whether our vessels captured at sea, or seized in the Ports of France, shall be tried by the Council of Prizes, or by the Administrations of Marine. The Case of the Caliope is in fact coming to trial by the former Tribunal under my direction. This Ship sailed from New York on the 27th. of Novr:, was visited by a British Cruizer, on the 28th. of Decr. who inscribed on her Register a Note not to enter a french Port. On the 30th. of the same month, however, she entered l\u2019Orient, & though having a french Officer on bord charged with dispatches for this Government, she has been since seized, & is now under trial in virtue of the decree of 17th. of Decr.\nMy Colleague at Amsterdam has doubtless forwarded to you the Decree of his Majesty the King of Holland of the 23 of Jany., still as the Conveyances by sea are so extremely precarious I think it not amiss to send it to you as published in the News papers here.\nsigned Fulwar Skipwith", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2636", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Maurice Rogers, 1 February 1808\nFrom: Rogers, Maurice\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nAmerican Consulate St. Iago de Cuba 1 Feby. 1808\nI have the honor to inclose you transcripts of the arrivals of American Vessels in this port, from the first of July last untill the 31st. day of December inclusive, also of Vessells sailing from this port for the United States with their Cargoes & estimation thereof, all of which is respectfully submitted With perfect consideration I have the Honor to remain Your very obt. Servt.\nMaurice Rogers", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2637", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Henry Rose, 1 February 1808\nFrom: Rose, George Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nFebruary 1st. 1808.\nMr. Rose will not fail to do himself the honor of attending Mr. Madison at the Office of State to-morrow (Tuesday) at one o\u2019clock.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2640", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Valentin de Foronda, 1 February 1808\nFrom: Foronda, Valentin de\nTo: Madison, James\nMuy Se\u0148or m\u00edo:\nPhilada 1. de Febrero de 1808.\nTengo la honra de poner en noticia de V.S. que el Comandante General de las Provincias \u00ednternas Dn. Nemesio Salcedo me env\u00eda una cuenta muy detallada des los gastos que resultaron de la entrada de la Part\u00edda del teniente P\u00edke en los Dominios del Rey mi Amo, \u00e0 fin de que pida su reembolso \u00e0 estos Estados. Estos gastos ascienden \u00e0 21.635, ps. 5 rs. 7. granos. Entre ellos se v\u00e9 la partida de 105. ps. 2. rs. Con que se secorri\u00f3 la partida de P\u00edke.\nV.S. sabe mejor que yo, que es un axioma \u00edncontrastable, que el que causa gastos no deb\u00edendo causarlos, debe responder de ellos. La partida del teniente P\u00edke entr\u00f3 en un territorio en que no deb\u00eda haber entrado: esta partida servia \u00e0 estos Estados: luego ellos deben re\u00edntegrar los desembolsos que han causado.\nSe me dir\u00e1 que err\u00f3 el camino el Se\u0148or P\u00edke: sea en hora buena: pero su equivocac\u00edon no fue efecto del Gobierno Espa\u0148ol; asi no debe cargarse con unos gastos de que no ha sido Autor, y s\u00ed estos Estados, como que la partida comandada por el Se\u0148or P\u00edke les pertenec\u00eda.\nNo dudo pues de los principios justos que dirijen \u00e0 su Excella. el Se\u0148or Presidente que dar\u00e1 la orden de que se ponga \u00e0 mi dispos\u00edcion dha cantidad, estando yo pronto \u00e1 remitir la cuenta \u00edndividual de gastos, que consta de 7. pl\u00edegos, y que quedan en mis manos. V.S. ver\u00e1 por ella que solo se carga \u00e0 dos Enfermos Pr. 75. d\u00edas, 37.$. 4.rs. Esto expongo por una prueba de la moderacion con que est\u00e1 hecha la cuenta. Dios gue. \u00e0 V.S. ms. as. B. L. M. de VS su mas atento servidor\nValentin de Foronda", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2641", "content": "Title: Notes on Negotiations with George Henry Rose, 1 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: \nFriday 1. Feby. 1808\nGeneral object of interview\nexplain causes of proclamn. continuance of attack--by seamen detain--officers recalled--ships in harbors doing illegal things\nGrounds of prelimy. 1. disavol--by Ld. G. due to G. B. even if war meant 2. general assurance & personal conviction\nImpossible persl. convtn. for means of judging for ourselves see Mr. C.\nprinter\u2019s fistObject of procln.--precaution--not merely uncertainty as to the Chesapeakprinter\u2019s fist2 Errors.1. in supposing reparation object--wch. an item then only.2. precaution vs. Chesapeake--\nDisavowal--due to G. B. even if war meant honor, interest, principles so much agst. her--disavowd. by Ld. Grenville\ndisavowal no reparation--shews a disposition only to repair.\nProject. of expln. particulars & contemporary acts\nMr. Rose--suggests idea of his friendly return with rept. of the diffly.\nJ.M.--reports this to P. who in consulton on Monday dcides vs. this idea--and prefers informal disclosure by R to be contemporary acts of atonement & repeal of procln\nTuesday Feby 1. \nJ.M. states to Mr. R objection to adjournment of subject in Gr B which Mr. Rose admits--& in conversation as between two private Gentn.--enquires whether U. S will agree to a mutual discharge from pub.ships, all natl. born subjects & citizens, it appearing to be implied that this might contribute to diminish difficulties & prepare way for something further--willing to wait for answer\nWednesday Feby. 4. 3\nIdea of Cabinet that the mutual discharge not inadmissible, if extended to mercht. vessels; considering the advantage to naturalized subjects, of being kept out of danger from being taken into the jurisdiction of their former sovereign; and that Mr. R. be sounded as to his powers & dispositions.\nThursday Feby. 4.\nConversation of J. M. with Mr. Rose explained himself on the subject of Tuesday\u2019s conversation, by signifying that his suggestion was a hasty thought, & that it was most consonant to his situation to limit the enquiry to the case of deserting subjects natural born--He was told this was already provided for by the rules prescribed to our naval commanders--occasion was taken to express the desire of U. S. to remove all causes of danger to the harmony &c--as well as that exemplified in affair of Chesapk. which was evidently of a nature not likely to recur after disavowal &c. He did not open himself as to any thing beyond the limit to which he reduced ye. enquiry, acquiescing generally in the desireableness of a general adjustment &c The objections to the delay of seeking further instructions &c was dwelt on by both, and ended in a frank & direct suggestion by J. M. to let the satisfaction, acceptance & recall of procln. to be executed on same day, and so as not to shew on the face of the proceeding a priority, leaving this to be assumed respectively as might be agreeable. He M. Rose wd. take into consideration with best wishes, but was not sure that his instructions could bend to it; He held out the idea of exhibiting without. editing the revoking procln. as an expedient to save him. He was told nothing cd. be admitted that wd expose the Ex. to appearance of having yielded to his prelimy-- and it was remarked that Mr. Canning if he had not supposed the Procln. to be a retaliation, & that the aggression had been discontinued, which cd. not be during the detention of the men, wd. have approvd. this course at least. Mr. R. glanced at idea of disclosing his terms &c thro\u2019 Mr E & Mr. Rt. Smith. He went away under an arrangemt. for another interview tomorrow 12 OC.\nThursday Feby. 5.\nConversation\nMr. Rose appeared to have taken a view of the proposed contemporary signing of adjustment and of the Procln., which required him to decline it definitively. On my restating it, he resumed the conversation and agreed to see me in the Evening at my house in order to hold frank & informal communications & explanations.\nEvening of Feby. 5.\nHe brought Mr. Erskine with him. The conversation was free. The tenor of a suitable procln. disclosed, & the terms he meant to offer--viz. recall of Admiral Berkley--restoration of 3 men--& provision for families of the killed & wounded. The idea of restoration to the same Ship was stated to him, which he seemed willing to favor--also punisht. of Berkley which he sd. wd. be difficult by his Co-officers--& be in the result perhaps an obstacle to a permanent exclusion from actual employmt. Agreed to see one another at 1 OC. tomorrow at Office of State.\nFriday Feby. 6.\nConversation\nMr. Rose starts the idea of a disavowal on our part of conduct of Agents &c. in incouraging & not discharging deserters--natural born subjects. This was combated as going out of the Case of Chesapk. and leading to other subjects of complaint--and particularly as justifying a demand of British disavowal of Douglas &c &c. The difficulty also as to natural born, was stated in cases of naturalization. He was reminded too that orders had been issued & circulated to Officers agst. recruiting deserters &c. which was amply sufficient. He retired, under doubts as to the possibility of his satisfying his instructions without obtaining this point. Monday Feby. 8. appd. to meet again\nMonday Feby. 8.\nInstead of the expected matter, Mr. Rose very soon introduced as a point, enjoined in his instructions, the necessity of some disavowal on the part of the U. S. as to the conduct of their Agents in encouraging harbouring & retaining Deserters natural born Subjects of H. B. M; as what had preceded the affair of the Chesapeake & was but a reasonable satisfaction to his M. preparatory to the adjustment intended by him.\nAs this was a new & unlooked for preliminary ultimatum, tho it had it been glanced at in a former conversation when it was supposed to have been answered in a way putting it entirely aside, it was proposed to him to reduce it to paper so that there might be no possible misconception, with a general intimation only that it could not be admitted into the adjustment, and that it wd. be impossible for the U. S. to view natural born subjects of G B. who had been naturalized here, in any other light than as American Citizens, whilst within American jurisdiction. Mr. R. agreed to see me the next day (Tuesday Feby. 9) with his idea put into writing to be informally read to me.\nTuesday Feby. 9. 1808\nMr. Rose read from his paper in substance \"that with a view to remove impressions made by recent events, on the mind of H. B. M., the U. S. shd. disavow the conduct of their Agents in encouraging harboring & not discharging, Natural born deserters--a case different from not surrendering which was not claimed.\nHe was reminded of the difficulty as to natural born subjects, naturalized by the U. S.--that if impressions were to be removed on one side, so on the other where they were much greater from the course of indignities offered by British ships in our harbors & on our coasts--that the proposal was not reciprocal in itself, a thing essential to the honor of the U. S. (here he remarked that this had not escaped him, reading a reservation to the U. S. of their right to claim from G. B. a like disavowal; to which the reply was, that there was no reciprocity between an actual disavowal, and a right to ask a disavowal;) & finally that it could not enter into the Chesapeak business, unless other things as much connected with it were also to be admitted.\nBeing myself much indisposed the conversation was soon ended with an understandg. that I would take the orders of the P. & see him as soon as convenient.\nSunday Feby. 14.\nThis was the earliest that I had health eno\u2019 to see Mr. R. who was invited to call at my house for the purpose. I preferred the irregularity both as to time & place, to a delay which was becoming very disagreeable on all sides; & was rendered to him, as he had indicated, peculiarly distressing, by his having two B. Packets detained till he could say some thing on the subject of his mission.\nHaving previously obtained the sanction of the P. I repeated the insuperable objections to his proposal (adding that in fact there had been no refusal to discharge deserters--the demand being always to surrender); and in place, suggested a mutual disavowal 1st. as to receiving deserters into naval service; 2d. as to claiming a surrender of them. This wd. agree with the principles now maintained on both sides--wd. be reciprocal, & might be useful.\nHe admitted that the surrender was not claimed--but that his instructions did not authorize any such general or separate arrangemts. being restricted to the case of the Chesapeake.\nIt was observed that this was at least as much connected wth that as the case of the discharge; and it was signified that a mutual general & separate disavowal of this case alone wd. not be inadmissible, with a saving by the form of expression, of our principle as to naturalized Citizens. This also was declined as not within his instructions.\nHe was finally told, as had been on former occasions intimated, that it wd. be easy to write a letter on some pretext to Mr. Erskine, explaining the principles of the U. S. as to Deserters--that if mere assurance of these principles was the object of his Govt. that object wd. thus be attained as well as in his mode--if not that but, an expiatory act on the part of the U. S. was the object, it was absolutely inadmissible.\nHe dwelt with expressions of great regret, on the situation in which he found himself, tied down as he was by his instructions, and knowing as he did the impressions of his Govt. To all which it was simply remarked that the attack on the Chesapke. was a detached flagrant insult to the flag & Sovereignty of the U. S. on the high seas, in face of the world; that the plain course was to repair that, accordg to usage public & private, & to the examples of his own Govt; that reparation made, the way was open to any demands of redress on other points if any existed where it might be due to the redressing party--& a general example was the best mode of securing liberal satisfaction.\nIn course of this conversation, he mentioned, with an apology for omitting it before when he intended to do it, that a disavowal of Commodore Barron\u2019s denial that he had such men on board as were required, made a part of his instructions.\nAfter remarking that it was impossible in any view, that that circumstance could be admitted & that it was merely noticed for the sake of truth, which cd. never do harm where the manner did not imply something improper--I told him that Barron was responsible to his Govt. for his conduct in that instance--that his reply was wholly unbecoming his station--that it was probable however that he said what he believed to be true--& indeed was true--the demand of Humphreys being for deserters from other ships, than that to which the men taken from the Chesapk. belonged. This he admitted except as to one Jenkins Radford stated to be a deserter from the Halifax. I told him that even as to him, we had the authy. of the B. Consul at Norfolk that he was a deserter from a Merchtman. This he seemed not to be aware of & sd. if the fact was wrong he cd. not found a proceeding on it. He retired with an intimation that he wd. revolve the subject & his instructions still further, & see me when I pleased to intimate, which was promised as soon as health permitted. His manner & concluding remarks left it uncertain what determination he wd. bring to the interview.\nTuesday Feby. 16.\nConversation\nMr. Rose, in consequence of an offer to see him today called about 2 OC. It appeared that he did not consider himself authorized to accede to either proposal for getting over the difficulty respecting the disavowal required from the U. S. of the conduct of our Agents in harboring encouraging & not discharging deserters. He was reminded that this disavowal as stated by him was as much a departure from the specific case of the Chesapeak, as the mutual disavowals proposed by me, being general as to deserters, and not restricted to those entering on board the Chesapeak. He seemed sensible of this, and manifested a disposition to make it rather more limited; but proposed nothing; nor did he revive the subject of disavowing Barrons answer; seeming to be prepared for abandoning further informal conversations, and leaving me to answer in form his note of the 26 Ult. This was promised as soon as my health, and some urgent business (meaning the despach of the Vessel waiting at N. Y. to carry letters &c. to France & G. B) would permit; it being remarked to him that the hopes that, an answer wd. have been rendered unnecessary, had thus far prevented me from particularly revolving even a suitable answer.\nMonday Feby 22.\nMr. Rose having signified by a note last evening, a wish for an interview to day, 2 OC. was named when he called for the purpose.\nHis object appeared to be to express his hopes that a failure of our negociations, might be still consistent with a future adjustment, either here or in Engd. and to speak of the difficulty under which he should find himself in making known to his Govt. the points on which the failure wd. have taken place; as he could not give this explanation, after a refusal of his preliminary, witht. shewing that he had departed from his instructions. With these remarks he mingled expressions of much solicitude that no unfavorable inferences might be drawn from the obstacles arising from his instructions, and that he might be instrumental in promoting a removal of them, which he thought he could best do by personal communications at London.\nIt was observed to him, that without meaning to express more than an abstract opinion, it wd. seem not difficult to let his Govt. understand the points on which the business failed, by intimating that there were sufficient indications that if the preliminary had been complied with or got over, the views entertained by the Govt. on those points, wd. have necessarily produced a failure. It was intimated also that the place most proper in itself for adjusting the matter was here, not in G. B. and that the propriety was strengthened by what had passed. If in the first instance, London had been proposed, it was with a view to hasten the result.\nThe Mutual observations were made pointing out the inconveniences of referring the subject to a settlement under new instructions: His attention was drawn to the experiments which had been made to avoid delay, and it was repeated to him that there was still a willingness to write a letter detached from & subject to an acceptance of the reparation, in which the principles & practice of the U. S. in the case of Deserters could be stated; with the addition, now authorized, that an order had issued for discharging from the pub. ships all British subjects. It was remarked that could not be mentioned but in a certain way, such as such a letter wd. admit, because the order was not the result of either legal obligation, or of example; his Govt. constantly refusing to discharge Americans voluntarily accepting a bounty.\nHe manifested satisfaction at this course, & signified that it could not fail to make agreeable impressions & promote salutary objects. He was reminded that this was more than his instructions aimed at: and it was for him to decide how far it wd. balance the objections to a departure from the letter of them\nHe professed to be gratified with the spirit of the conversation but without any apparent change in the course he was to pursue, and retired with an understanding, that I wd. see him at any time he might wish to resume it.\nWednesday 24 February\nPoints for Mr. Rose\nEvils of degradation mutually to be shunned \nAfter\n acceding to ye mode of separating cases of impressment & of the Chesapeak, the demand of such preliminary, the less looked for: so categorical & precise.\nThe recall of Procln. founded on disavowal &c &c\nWhat is disavowed? Act of unauthorized officer--and principle of do. an avowal never presumed--but the Contrary\nWhat to be recalled? Act of Govt. itself, an act not of aggression or of reparation, but of precaution--and referring to wrongs prior to & wholly distinct from the affair of Chesapeake.\nTo revoke the proclamation in face of world, undr. such circumstances, would acknowledge it to be aggressive, & wd. originate a reparation on our part instead of receiving one--\na degradation in fact the worst of all evils & which a nation determined never to be degraded, cd. never suffer to be imposed on it.\nDo not wish to require, cannot therefore perform, degrading conditions.\nUnless therefore some new turn to the subject--must proceed from oral to written communications. If a precise & categorical preliminary shuts the door agst. all chance & prospect, delay is fruitless\nBut if door not shut, it will be agreeable to find that, the consequences of a failure, are not suspended on an ultimatum of such a character.\nThe revocation of the Procln. impossible, witht. extending the disavowal, and assurances, to the several cases which led to it-and referred to in it, & many of them long lying before your Govt. without notice or promise of future security to the U. S.\nFeby 25.\nMr. Rose having yesterday asked an interview was afforded one today. He seemed to have in view to prevent any expectation that he would instead of the disavowal required as to deserters, accept the information proposed to be given of the principles & policy of this Govt. on that subject, by suggesting, that as this course would be inconsistent with his powers, he should not act with candor towards us in so doing. He re-iterated his regret that his powers were so limited, and his belief that the orders issued to discharge all British subjects from our public ships, would make great impression on his Govt. Little was said in reply, further than repeating the inconveniences resulting from such an issue to his mission, and remarking on our disappt. at the tenor of his instructions, and the length we had prevailed on ourselves to go in order to surmount the difficulties they occasioned. It was intimated as one of the inconvenient effects of the actual portion of the business, that the President was sending a message to Congs. recomending an extension of the precautionary measures necessarily attended with expence &c", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2642", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Josef Yznardy, 1 February 1808\nFrom: Yznardy, Josef\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nConsular Office of the United States Cadiz 1st. February 1808.\nThe enclosed Document will prove the manner I have acted with Capt. Charles H. Hunt, who has brought me into troubles, as on the Eve of his sailing an order was issued by this Governor to detain the Vessel & bring her Rudder ashore; not knowing the motives I officiated with his Excellency concerning them; Capt. Hunt addressed me a petition claiming his property, on which I insisted; and the result was a request from his Excy. that I should, with the Capt. assist at his House, as I did, where appeared claiming Credits they had against the Ship, and declaiming that she was Spanish property cover\u2019d by said Hunt, who firmly sustained the Contrary, but at last confessed a private nt, and of course the false Sale was cancelled and he was order\u2019d to prison.\nI requested of his Excy. to give him up to me, with an offer that I would send him to America to be tried. I shipped him on board the Brig Aurora Capt. Goodwin bound to Boston, but he fell sick & was put in the Hospital, from where he eloped, without Knowing where he went to. Pray Sir what error have I committed on this business to be accused, after acting so prudently and in so disinterested a manner as I have, considering myself free of all responsibility, as no Man is so wise as to penetrate intentions fomented by malicious persons. I trouble you Sir with such trivial information, for in case they should be represented under false principals; as it appears to me a new conspiration is fomenting against me, and to free myself from any charge, I take the liberty to bring to your recollection the circumstances respecting the Vessels here under mentioned.\nThe Mary of New York Capt. Alexander Wood was Stranded in this Bay 21. Decr. 805. Of course the Owners made an abandonment, and she was advertised for Sale, which took place in this Office, and bought by Capt. Samuel Young of the American Ship Abby & Sally of Providence, in whose favor the Papers were endorsed, as advised that Office in due time.\nThe Peggy of Norfolk Capt. Edmd. Richardson, was also Sold at Public Auction in this Office d. October 805. at the request of the Capn. and was purchased by Capt. Saml. G. Nicoll\u2019s of the American Ship Sally of New York, to whom the Papers were deliver\u2019d as Pr acknowledgment of the Secretary of the Treasury under date of the 10. October 805.\nPermit me Sir to acquaint you that it is almost impossible for any honorable Man to serve the Consular Office with integrity, as the Americans are the very persons that puts them in the way of acting wrong imperceptibly, and when the Consuls the like, they reveal against him and foment accusations. On the 25th. October 806. the American Eliza of New Bedford Thomas Adams Master was stranded in this Bay and sold at Public Auction in this Office. The Consignee wished that the Capn. should purchase her for account of the Owners, to which he did not agree, but after joined with Mr. Meade and bought her for their Account: which I did not Know untill some time past, that said Vessell returned to this Port and took a Cargo of Wine for England on freight covering the property in the name of some American Merchants It is certainly very hard & strange that the very Man that bought this and other propertys should be my accuser. With Sentiments of due consideration I have the honor to be with profound Respect, Sir Your devoted & most obedt. Servant\nJosef Yznardy\nMr Hackley influenced by Mr. Meade as appears by the Correspondce. contradicted by me.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-02-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2643", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Peter Kuhn, Jr., 2 February 1808\nFrom: Kuhn, Peter, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nPhiladelphia 2d. Feby 1808.\nI have the honour to inform you of my arrival in the United States by the Schooner Thetis from Genoa.\nYou will no doubt have recieved Some information from General Armstrong regarding the violation that has been Committed upon the American Consulate, and the imprisonment of my person at Genoa by the French Government, the particulars of which I shall have the honour to communicate most minutely, in a short time. The fatigue of a long Voyage, together with the ill state of my health, proceeding from the unprecedented injuries and Sufferings I underwent during my confinement in the Tower of Genoa, preclude the possibility of my giving that attention at this moment to the Object which it Requires.\nI pray Sir that you may make acceptable to His Excellency The President my gratefull acknowledgements for the favor He has conferred upon me in Committing to my Care so honorable a charge, which I flatter myself has been Conducted with consistent dignity and without error I have the honour to be With profound Respect Sir, Your Most Obt. & very Hul. Sert\nPeter Kuhn Junr:", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-02-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2644", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Jarvis, 2 February 1808\nFrom: Jarvis, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nLisbon 2nd. Feby. 1808\nCaptn Baty being detained in consequence of some irregularity in the passports of one of his passengers, which I have this moment, (at 9 p. m.) arranged, affords me the opportunity to acquaint you by him, that General Junot, yesterday formally took possession of the Government, of Portugal in the name of the Emperor, that he is appointed Governor General & Commander in Chief of all Portugal, that a new Government has been organised in which there is in every department one Frenchman & one Portugueze, that the Regency has been dissolved & the Family of Braganza declared to have forfeited all right to the Crown of Portugal and the French Arms have replaced those the late Royal family, all which has been affected without the least tumult. Inclosed is the declaration published on the occasion. Respectfully \nW. Jarvis\nDup: P. S. to letter of the 29th. Jany\nFrom the present appearances of European affairs & of Portugal in particular, I am persuaded that the Commerce of the United States to this Country will be daily lessening. France can & doubtless will supply the wants of Portugal with grain, which now employs by much the largest part of the capital of our Citizens engaged in the Commerce between the two Countries. The demand also of Portugal for bread will daily be lessening from the great number of Merchants & Artisans which are likely to emigrate to the Brazils and from the encouragement which will doubtless be given to cultivate grain instead of the vine, to open another channel for the vent of French Wines. Necessity too will oblige those who remain to consume the smallest possible quantity which will serve for human subsistence, for the Source from whence Portugal drew her riches being now cut off, & she having but few or no internal resources, she will not have the means of paying for more foreign provisions & manufactures than are indispensibly necessary for her consumption, if so much. These considerations, with that of the property which my industry & close application to business have enabled me to gain, not being adequate to maintain me without business, makes me prefer a Consulate in the Brazils to my present situation. The places which offer the greatest Commercial advantages are Rio Janiero, Bahia de St. Salvador, Pernambuco, ragnon, Para & Espiritos dos Santos. As the President may deem the Country of sufficient importance to have a Commission\u2019d Charge d\u2019Affaires, a Man of considerable talents, of an agreeable address who will not be personally engaged in Commerce, on whom Govmt. may also think it advisable to confer the title of Consul General and who must make Rio Janiero his place of residence as the Seat of Government, I shall give up all thoughts of that port & confine my solicitation particularly to St. Salvador, in I beleive its particular name at full length is Bahia de St. Salvador. In soliciting this office, I shall not venture to urge in my behalf the success which may have followed my Official applications here, although perhaps not inferior to what was experienced by the two last Ministers at this Court under the late Presidents, as I am sensible that it has been principally owing to the influence of the Presidents wise & steady administration; and had it been more personal I can have no other claim to merit than that of having done my duty. It may not however be amiss here to observe that what has been effected through my instrumentality, has been accomplished by fair & direct representation; in which no other, perhaps I may be allowed the merit of having been faithful to my trust as a Public Officer; of having a desire to act in correspondence with the views of Government and having done all in my power to promote the interests of my Country & Countrymen: and I think that I can with propriety add that my conduct as a man has been as correct, Moral & honorable as commonly falls to the share of human nature. I think too I may with justice say that from the civility I have always experienced from the late Ministry, I presume my appointment would be perfectly satisfactory to His Royal Highness\u2019 Government. Should any doubts be entertained as to the propriety of an immediate appointment of Officers to that Country, from a supposition of the return of the Prince Regent or for want of due Official notice, and the President does not disapprove of my application, I hope Government will do me the honor to remember me when those doubts are cleared away. Respectfully\nWm. Jarvis", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-02-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2645", "content": "Title: To James Madison from David Gelston, 2 February 1808\nFrom: Gelston, David\nTo: Madison, James\nPrivate\nDear Sir,\nNew York Feb: 2d. 1808\nBy the Lorenzo, Dill, from Bordeaux, I have received from Mr. Lee, invoice and bill of lading for sundries, P memorandum enclosed.\nI shall do the needful, and forward them to you, when opportunity offers, with the invoice. Very sincerely your\u2019s\nDavid Gelston", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-02-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2646", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 2 February 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\n(Duplicate)\nSir,\nLondon February 2d. 1808.\nI had an interview this morning with Mr. Canning at his own request.\nOne object of the interview related to the message of the President of the 27th. of October last, of which a newspaper copy had been received from Mr. Erskine. A call for a copy of this message was expected in parliament; and Mr. Canning wished to be in a situation to produce it. I could not assist him; and I suppose the newspaper copy will be considered sufficient.\nAs soon as this subject was disposed of, Mr. Canning observed, that he had requested to see me principally for the purpose of conversing with me, privately and extra officially, upon the duty proposed to be laid, in consequence of their late blockading orders, upon cotton, intended for re-exportation to enemy ports upon the Continent. The very few occasional remarks, which I had made upon this subject at our last interview (already mentioned in my letter of the 26th. ultimo) had led him to suppose, that it was only to the mode of excluding our cotton from France that the United States would be likely to object; and that if their object could be accomplished in another way the measure would cease to be offensive.\nHaving admitted (what indeed was sufficiently obvious before) that they looked to the intended duty upon cotton as a complete prohibition, he said that, if it would be more acceptable to the United States that the form of the proceeding should be changed, so as to leave the exclusion of cotton from the Continent to the mere effect of the blockade, their desire to consult our feelings and wishes, in whatever did not entirely counteract the great end of the measure, would direct them to adopt such a modification of their plan. In the course of his explanations on this point he introduced professions of good will towards our country, of regret that France had imposed upon them the necessity of resorting to a step which might be supposed to press with severity upon our interests, and of an anxious desire that a return to a system of equity and moderation on the part of her enemies would speedily enable Great Britain to abandon (as she would in that case instantly do) the whole of the present orders of Council. He stated that it was peculiarly important towards the just effect of the orders (of which it was the object to compel France to relieve the commerce of the world from the oppression of her late decrees) that considerable supplies of cotton should not be introduced into the Continent; that it had been hoped and believed that the United States would not view as harsh or unfriendly a constrained attempt by Great Britain to prevent such supplies from being received by the other parties to the war, especially as it was certain that Great Britain could herself consume almost the whole of the cotton which we were in the habit of sending abroad; and that they had preferred the imposition of a duty upon cotton to a direct prohibition through the operation of the blockade, because it was consistent with the various and extensive modifications of the blockade, to which they had been led, not merely by views of advantage to themselves, but by a respect for the convenience and feelings of other nations, and particularly of America. In fine, he wished to know my private opinion, before the subject came before parliament, whether an alteration in this respect, from a prohibiting duty to an absolute interdict, would be likely to be acceptable to us. I replied in as conciliatory a manner as I could, that, as soon as I had understood that a duty was to be proposed on re-exportation of cotton, I had been disposed to take for granted that the object was not revenue but prohibition; that whether the object were the one or the other, it was, as he knew, my opinion that the United States would hold that object, as well as the means, and the whole system connected with them, to be utterly inadmissible, and that I did not feel myself authorized to say to which of the courses he had suggested my government would give the preference, or that it would feel any preference for either.\nMr. Canning at length asked me if I should think it worth while to consult my government on this subject; observing at the same time that he would not wish it to be done if there was the least danger of giving offense, and assuring me that what he had said proceeded from motives the most amicable and respectful towards us. He added that upon reflection, this would perhaps be the most convenient mode; as it would give them a good deal of trouble to accomodate their plan, as prepared for Parliament, to a change of so much importance, in season to be acted upon.\nI answered in substance (as I saw it was his wish) that I would mention what had passed to you; and that I did not doubt that the motive of his proposal, whatever might be thought of the proposal itself, would be acceptable to the President. He requested me to say to you that, altho\u2019 the necessary bills would be proposed, and would pass, in Parliament, according to their first project of a duty, yet that the alteration above suggested would be adopted, whenever it should be known that it would be agreeable to us.\nI need not trouble you with any reflections upon this conversation. But it is my duty to say that, altho\u2019 Mr. Canning\u2019s manner was extremely conciliatory, not a word escaped him to encourage a hope, that the orders of Council would be in any degree abandoned, or that I should gain any thing by urging a reconsideration of them. I threw out some intimations with that tendency; but soon perceived that it could not be useful to follow them up. I have the Honor to be, with the highest esteem and consideration, Sir, Your Most: Obt: Servant\nWm. Pinkney", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-03-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2647", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Josef Yznardy, 3 February 1808\nFrom: Yznardy, Josef\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nCadiz 3d: February 1808.\nI have the honor to enclose you Copies of my Official letter, to this Capn. General of the Navy & of his answer thereto, in consequence of the American Brig Mary Capt. Thomas Hunt being visited by a British Privateer on her voyage from Philadelphia to this Port; which agreable to His Catholic Majesty\u2019s Decree of the 8th. ultimo (the Gazette containing the same I remitted P the Brig Peggy Capt. Tobey bound to Norfolk) she is good prize. I have also officiated with the Capt. General at Sn. Roque respecting the American Vessels brought in there by Privateers on the ground of being Visited & examin\u2019d by British Vessels; and I hope to obtain the same success as I have here.\nDepend Sir, that no Steps or pains will be wanting on my part to defend to the utmost of my power the flag I have the honor to represent, having given immediate notice to Mr. G. W. Erving at Madrid. With due consideration & Respect, I am Sir, Your most obedt. Servant,\nJosef Yznardy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-03-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2650", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Henry Lee, 3 February 1808\nFrom: Lee, Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nAlexa. 3d. Feby 08.\nI have been detained here by a violent cold taken on my journey & of which I am just recovering.\nThe solicitude all feel for the country at this portentous moment I share. It seems to me that in yr. hands is committed our destiny. If you play yr. game well you bestow happiness to yr. country & acquire the only reward grateful I am sure to yr. mind.\nPersonally I feel interested in the issue, for I always have & ever shall be happy in yr. good; altho I have long differed from you in politics. I fear you do not hear all the truth & I mean to present myself to you some evening when I can learn you have no party at home, nor engaged out. I hope you will place such decision (which I may not perhaps be able to execute) to its right motive which I trust you will readily recognise Yr. frd. & ob: Ser.\nH: Lee", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-03-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2651", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Leonard, 3 February 1808\nFrom: Leonard, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\n3d. february 1808.\nI find that all the Consuls in this part of Europe charge the fee of $ for every official signature & Seal in the Same manner as I have hitherto done, being unacquainted with the existence of the laws to the contrary. I have at length obtain\u2019d the law which regulate the charges respecting the certificate of drawback, which differs from charges on other official acts, and shall be guided by the Same in future. I have the honor to be With very &c. &c. &c.\nJ Leonard\n of protest made by Goodwin &c\n in my replies.\nCopy of letter to Mr. Erving & Hugues & Deyore\nDo from Mr. Erving\nCopy of letter from Cap Beckford of Ship Catherine", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2652", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Eliphalet Land and Co, 4 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Eliphalet Land and Co\nGentlemen.\nDept. of State, Feb: 4th. 1808.\nYour letter of the 12th. Ultimo has just been received. The business to which it relates will be attended to by Levitt Harris Esqr. our Consul at Petersberg, on being furnished with documents substantiating the facts, and constituting the merits of the case. I am &c.\n(signed) James Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2653", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Ira Allen, 4 February 1808\nFrom: Allen, Ira\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nWashington Feby. 4th. 1808\nI submit for Consideration in addition to my Letter of the Eleventh Ult whether it would not be Consistent in Preparitory of Receiving the Proposed Accession of Territory from the Canada\u2019s to Stipulate that the Prohibitory Act of Congress Respecting English Goods should be Repealed in the Port of St. Lawrence and that there should not be no Imbargo on Sd Port During the Present war in Europe These Stipulations would be Strong inducements to the British Government as in that Case much Pigg Iron Lumber Provisions &c might be furnished from Lake Champlain and Being Incorported into the Contract (that Surrendered Territory and Releaved the United States from Indian Wars) and an Interior Navigation Could not Involve the United States in War with France or other Powers and such Port Duties &c might be of Consequence Should our Ports Remain Shut for any Length of time which most Probably will Depend on the Events of Europe But the Business Respecting the Canada\u2019s and Commerce by St. Lawrence are Seperate Transactions with England alone as mutual Interests may Stimulate the Contracting Parties. I have the Honour to be your most Obedient Humble Servt.\nIra Allen", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2654", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John George Jackson, 4 February 1808\nFrom: Jackson, John George\nTo: Madison, James\nMy dear Sir,\nClarksburg February 4th. 1808\nThe enclosed Letter to Mrs. M has given too faithful a portrait of our situation & prospects. They are too painful to be repeated to you. If any thing can blunt the poignancy of my wounds it will be the solace that I enjoy the friendship of her connections which it will be my sincerest wish to retain forever\nPerhaps (& I feel that it is the kind suggestion of hope improbable & unlooked for) I may yet be deceived & my prayers for her recovery will be heard.\nThen my kind friend I will present her to you as one torn from the embrace of death & released from the confines of the Grave. I smile with raptures on the picture I have drawn of the future but it is the smile of dispair. Adieu my dear Friend, ever yours\nJ G Jackson", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2656", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Gavino, 4 February 1808\nFrom: Gavino, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nGibraltar 4th. feby. 1808\nI had the honor of addressing you the 10th. ultimo No. 50, & the 18. Do. No. 51 By the former I inclosed duplicates of Collonel Lears letters to me and advised his dfts P $25,000 which are all paid, for the reimbursement of which he sent me his dfts on you to same amount which I indorsed and forwarded you to be Credited me by your Honourable Department. I then advised the Brig Neptune of Baltimore John Patrick Master being brought in, the Capn. & Crew having abandond her, which I Claimd, but Capn. Patrick & Crew having since got here I withdrew my Claim, and he enterd his. The Cause was this day tryd, and the British Ships of Warr has been awarded one Eighth Clear Salvage on the Value of Vessel & Cargo for taking her in Custody with 15 Men & a Lieut. who brought her safe here; by the latter I advised my Bill on your 30 d/ s order Joseph Swasey for one thousand hard Dollars which doubt not its being honourd and noted accordingly.\nThe Ship Ann of Boston, Davis Master, with a Cargo of sugar &ca. Cleard for Smyrna from Boston has been tryd this day, as Smyrna is Blocaded but the Judge released her as the Masters Instructions were to call at Malta for Information of said Blocade.\nIn consequence of His Brit. Majestys orders in Council of Novr. last, the Comander in chief of this Fortress Directed no Neutral Vessels having the Produce of the Enemy\u2019s Colloneys on board being Cleard for any Port Except in great Britain, In Consequence of which I wrote him two official Letters dated 28th. Ultimo & first Instant on the Subject as P Copy Inclosed with his answer, to which please be referrd; we have about 8 Sail of American Vessels now in Port under that disagreeable Circumstance, and about thirty others waiting Convoys to Pass the Gutt and avoid the late French & Spanish Decrees. I have the honour to be with respect, Sir Your most obed & most Huml. Servt\nJohn Gavino", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2657", "content": "Title: From James Madison to United States Congress, 5 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: United States Congress\nWashington, February 5, 1808.\nThe Commissioners of the Sinking Fund respectfully report to Congress as follows:\nThat the measures which have been authorized by the Board, subsequent to their report of the 5th of February, 1807, so far as the same have been completed, are fully detailed in the report of the Secretary of the Treasury to this Board, dated the fourth day of the present month, and in the statements therein referred to, which are herewith transmitted, and prayed to be received as part of this report.\nGeo. Clinton,President of the Senate,\nJ. Marshall, Chief Justice of the United States,\nJames Madison,Secretary of State,\nAlbert Gallatin,Secretary of the Treasury,\nC. A. Rodney,Attorney General U. States.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2659", "content": "Title: JM Draft of embargo repeal proclamation, 5 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: \n5 February 1808\nHis B. M. having manifested his disposition to reestablish, by an honorable reparation of the aggression committed in the month of June last on the frigate Chesapeak of the U. S. by the Leopard a British ship of war, the good understanding affected by that incident; and this evidence of his disposition to maintain amity with the U. S. being considered as a pledge that such effectual measures will be taken on his part as shall ensure from his naval commanders an entire respect for the laws and the jurisdiction of the U. S. whilst within their waters or on their coasts, and render unnecessary the precautionary measures provided by my proclamation of the 2d. of July 1807: On these considerations, and with a view to manifest a corresponding desire to promote a return of entire harmony between the two nations, I have thought proper to issue this my proclamation discontinuing all the provisions of the sd. former proclamation: & hereby declaring that the same shall become void, cease, and have no further effect: of which all officers Civil & military of the U. S. and all Citizens & others within the same, are required to take notice & act accordingly", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2660", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Jarvis, 5 February 1808\nFrom: Jarvis, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir \nLisbon 5th february 1805 1808\nSome further detention of the Brig Da Bailes affords me an opportunity of enclosing to you the fourth decree of the first instant, the three first of which were put under cover with my Official letter by the Vessel of the 29 ulo plublished to day, levying a contribution of Twenty millions of Dollars on Portugal. From what I understand to day General Junot has not any new title conferred on him, but is confirmed Commander or General in Chief of the French army in Portugal. It appears however that the Power of levying the whole contribution is confided to him. With entire respect I have the Honor to be", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2661", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Henry Rose, 5 February 1808\nFrom: Rose, George Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nFriday, Feby. 5th. 1808\nMr. Rose begs leave to assure Mr. Madison, that it will be perfectly convenient to him to do himself the honor of waiting upon him at one o\u2019Clock this afternoon at the Office of State.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2662", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Towers, 5 February 1808\nFrom: Towers, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nPhilad Feby 5. 1808\nBusiness of the utmost importance to the welfare of my family, & preservation of my property, renders it absolutely necessary that I should if possible send a young Man to Bordeaux. I am therefore very solicitous to send in the vessel of the United States that is to Sail for Europe in a few days from New York, Mr. Emanuel Lewis, a native of this City. For this purpose I applied to the Collector of this Port who has referred me to you.\nPermit me therefore Sir to request pr return of Mail Permission for this purpose.\nAll necessary Expences will be cheerfully paid by me, who will be answerable if necessary for his Conduct. I am with due Consideration Sir Your Obed Serv\nJohn Towers\nIf the Wasp Sails on the 11th. there will be no time to loose.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2664", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Bryden, 5 February 1808\nFrom: Bryden, James\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nBaltimore, 5th. Feby 1808.\nOn my departure from Philada. to Balto., Colo. Paton, put into my particular care a Small Ban Box, addressed to Mrs. Maddison, which I have forwarded by my Friend Mr. Servis, and no doubt will come safe to hand. I remain Yr. Obdt. Hble. Servant\nJas Bryden", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2665", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Leander Cathcart, 5 February 1808\nFrom: Cathcart, James Leander\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nMadeira 5th: Feby. 1808\nI have the honor to inform You that on the 25: Jany Admiral Duckworth\u2019s Squadron hove into sight, composed of the Ships named at foot, in chase of the Rochford Squadron of Six Sail of the Line & Frigates, who had Escaped their Vigilance in a Gale of Wind, and Supposing they were a head of them hove too. The Comus Frigate arrived the 26th. at Night from Terceira, and had been chased by a Ship of the Line & a Frigate, supposed to be part of that Squadron. On the 27th: the Whole Squadron stood to the S. W. under a Crowd of Sail. Rear Admiral Sr. Samuel Hood in the Centaur joined them, but it is supposed proceeded to England. At present No Ships of War are in these Roads. Annexed is a list of the Ships which took Possession of this Island. Enclosed is a Certified Account Current of Seamens Disbursemts. for the last Six Months, The Customary list of Trade, & a Copy of My Letter of 8 Octor. last to which I request an Answer as soon as Possible, as hardly a Vessell arrives here that I am not troubled on the Subject of My Requisition. I have the honor to Continue with the most Respectful Esteem, Sir Your Obedient Servt:\nJames Leander Cathcart\nAdml. Duckworth\u2019s SquadronRoyal George110 Guns Sir Jno Duckworth V. Adml. of White{Cap: Dunn,Temeraire 98 Cap: Sir Chas. HamiltonNeptune 98 Cap: S. ThomasL. Tonnant 84 Rear Adml. DeCourceyDragon 74 Cap: ScottEuridia32 Sir Wm. BoltonUnicorn32 Cap: Hardeman.Ships which took Possession of IslandCentaur74 Guns Sir Saml. Hood, Cap: WebleyYork74Cap: Bartonptain74 Cap: WoolleyComus 20 Cap: PierceIntrepid 74 Cap: WorsleyShannon36 Cap: BerkeAlceste 44 Cap: MaxwellSuccess 32 Cap: Ayscoughricain 44And 18 Transports.\nP. S. I have not been able to procure any Wine on this Island superior to what I sent to Washington Bowie for Sale. A Voyage to the East Indies, or other Warm Climates, is the only thing that ameliorates Madeira Wine.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-06-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2667", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Henry Rose, 6 February 1808\nFrom: Rose, George Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nFebruary 6th. 1808.\nMr. Rose will do himself the honor of attending Mr. Madison at his own House this day at 2 o\u2019Clock. He learns with extreme concern the continuance of Mr. Madison\u2019s Indisposition.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-06-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2669", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Jonathan Mason, 6 February 1808\nFrom: Mason, Jonathan\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nSalem, Feby. 6th. 1808\nHaving been informed that Barthl. Putnam Esqr. has resigned his Office as Surveyor of this District, WE beg leave respectfully to reccommend Mr. George Hodges of this Town, to the President of the UStates; as in all respects qualified to become his Successor.\nYou will no doubt receive Several Communications for the Appointment to that Office; but we have the utmost Confidence in assuring the President of the UStates, that the Appointment of Mr. Hodges will give more general satisfaction to the Citizens of this District, who are friendly to the Administration, than that of any other gentleman who may become a Candidate & from the Knowledge we have of his Integrity, & Abilities to discharge the Duties of the Office to the Satisfaction of the Governt. WE will venture to say your Confidence will not be misplaced. With Sents. of Respt. We Remain Yr. Ob. Serv.\nJona. Mason\nAn. Devereux\nDanl. Peirce\nDaniel Sage\nZach A Silsbee\nJohn Hathorne\nBenj. Carpenter\nTimothy Willman Jr\nEbenr. Burrill\nBenj Rosier\nNehh: Buffinton\nBenjamin Ward\nGeorge Crowninshield\nGeorge Crowninshield Jnr\nRichd. Crowninshield\nNathl. Silsbee\nRobert Stone\nGideon Barstow\nGilbert Chadwick\nJoseph Ropes\nJohn Hathorne Jr.\nWilliam Silsbee\nJohn Buffington\nJoseph Knap", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-06-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2672", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Brown, 6 February 1808\nFrom: Brown, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nFrankfort Kentucky 6th. Feby. 1808\nGeo. M. Bibb Esqr. having resigned the Office of District Atty for the District of Kentucky Robert Wickliff has informed me of his desire to fill that Office & has requested me to express to you his wishes on that Subject. From a long & intimate acquaintance with Mr. Wickliff I do with much pleasure recommend him to the attention of the President as well qualified for that appointment being a Gentleman of high standing at the Bar, of strict integrity, of uniform decided republican Principles, and warmly attached to the present Administration. I have the honor to be With every sentiment of esteem & respect Your Most Obt. Serv\nJ: Brown", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-06-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2673", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Maury, Jr., 6 February 1808\nFrom: Maury, James, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir!\nAmerican Consulate Liverpool 6 February 1808\nI had the honor of writing to you on the 18th. Decr. and now inclose a table of the imports and exports in our vessels to, & from, this port for the last six months of the past year.\nThe news of the embargo has occasioned a considerable advance in the value of many articles of the produce of the United States, for which I pray reference to the inclosed Price-current. I have the honor to be With Perfect Respect Sir Your most Obedient Servant\nJames Maury\nN.B. The Original of this with the table alluded to is forwarded by the Robert Burns, Capt Waite, for New York", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-06-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2674", "content": "Title: From James Madison to David Gelston, 6 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Gelston, David\nSir.\nDept. of State, Feb: 6th. 1808.\nI think it proper to apprize you that it being intended that two persons should have a passage in the dispatch Vessel you are authorized to engage, according to the reservation made in behalf of the Government. It will be well for you to let it be so understood by the Owner of the Vessel, that he may make his arrangements accordingly. I am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2677", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Duane, 8 February 1808\nFrom: Duane, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nI expected before this time to have found some safe hand to transmit the Volume of papers by, but have been until this day unsuccessful. A Gentleman who sets out in a day or two promises to take it under charge in his trunk; I have it for the purpose safely packed up.\nI should have sent it before had I not meditated going to Washington myself. I find however that I can render more public service here than I could to myself at Washington, and have for the present abandoned the idea of going down; meantime if there is any mode in which I can render public Service, or if I by any mistaken ideas of facts (for I have no guides or advices but my own judgment) I shall be very happy to be informed or corrected, so as to render service and to avoid doing any disservice; however I know enough of the British Government and nation, to understand them pretty well, and the conduct they have pursued is too much in character to admit of any second opinion upon rational grounds This much I think is fit to say on public matters\nMr John Bioren and myself have agreed to propose the printing of an Edition of the Laws of the U States in a neat form, perfectly corresponding with the ideas of an index and arrangement which you were pleased to mention to me about two years ago. I shall Send you a copy of a Volume of Laws as a Specimen of the manner and Execution of the whole, and a Specification of the terms and other particulars. I have associated with Mr Bioren on account of his excellence as a printer and because it would Enable me to undertake business which my activity in the best interests of the country has hitherto prevented, rather than promoted as might in justice have been expected. I only mention this Subject now, and consider this only as a personal note, in order that when I send the book the circumstance may not appear precipitate. I require no answer I am Sir with Great Respect Your obed Sert\nWm. Duane", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2678", "content": "Title: From James Madison to John Armstrong, Jr., 8 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Armstrong, John, Jr.\nSir,\nDepartment of State February 8th. 1808\nYour letters and communications by Dr. Bullus were duly delivered on the day of . The same conveyance brought a copy of the sentence pronounced by the French prize Court in the case of the Horizon, giving a judicial effect to the Decree of Novr. 21. 1806, as expounded in the answer of Mr Champagny to your letter of the .\nWhilst the French Government did not avow or enforce a meaning of the Decree of Novr. 1806, in relation to the United States, extending its purview beyond the municipal limits, it could not in strictness be regarded as an infraction either of our neutral or conventional rights, and consequently did not authorize more than a demand of seasonable explanations of its doubtful import, or friendly expostulations with respect to the rigor and suddenness of its innovations.\nThe case is now essentially changed: A construction of the Decree is avowed and executed which violates as well the positive stipulations of the Convention of Sept. 30 1800, as the incontestable principles of public law. And the President charges you to superadd, to whatever representations you may have previously made, a formal remonstrance in such terms as may be best calculated either to obtain a recall of the illegal measure, so far as it relates to the United States, or to have the effect of leaving in full force all the rights accruing to them from a failure to do so.\nThat the execution of local laws against foreign nations on the high seas, is a violation of the rights of the former and the freedom of the latter, will probably not be questioned. A contrary principle would in fact imply the same exclusive dominion over the entire ocean as is enjoyed within the limits of the local sovereignty, and a degradation of every other nation from its common rights and equal rank.\nIf it be contended that the Decree, as a retaliation on the other belligerent, at the expence of neutral nations, is justified by a culpable acquiescence in the prior measures of that belligerent operating thro\u2019 neutrals, you will be able to deny such acquiescence, and to urge moreover that, on every supposition, the retaliating measure could not be justly enforced in relation to neutrals without allowing them at least a reasonable time for chusing between due measures against the prior wrong and an acquiescence in both. The copy of the representations to the British Government thro\u2019 its Minister here, on the subject of its orders of Jany. 1807, will at once disprove an acquiescence on the part of the United States, and explain the grounds on which the late extension of the French Decree of Novr. 1806, is an object of just remonstrance.\nThe conduct of the French Government, in giving this extended operation to its decree, and indeed in issuing one with such an apparent or doubtful import against the rights of the sea, is the more extraordinary inasmuch as the inability to enforce it on that element exhibited the measure in the light of an empty menace, at the same time that it afforded pretexts to her enemy for severe retaliations for which ample means are found in her naval superiority.\nThe accumulated danger\u2019s to which the illegal proceedings of the belligerent nations have subjected the commerce and navigation of the United States, have at length induced Congress to resort to an Embargo on our own vessels, as a measure best fitted for the crisis, being an effectual security for our mercantile property and mariners now at home and daily arriving, and at the same time neither a measure, nor just cause of war. Copies of this act were soon after its passage, transmitted to Mr Pinkney, with an authority to assure the British Government that it was to be viewed in this light; and that it was not meant to be the slightest impediment to amicable negotiations with foreign Governments. He was requested to avail himself of an opportunity of communicating to you and Mr Erving this view of the subject, and I hope that you will have been thence enabled to present it to the French Government. Not relying however on that indirect opportunity, I send by this another copy of the act, with an instruction from the President, that you make it the subject of such explanations as will guard against any misconception of the policy which led to it. It is strictly a measure of precaution required by the dangers incident to external commerce, and being indiscriminate in its terms and operation towards all nations, can give no just offence to any. The duration of the act is not fixed by itself; and will consequently depend on a continuance or cessation of its causes in a degree sufficient in the judgment of the Legislature to induce or forbid its repeal. It may be hoped that the inconveniences felt from it by the belligerent nations may lead to a change of the conduct which imposed the inconveniencies of it on ourselves. France herself will be a sufferer, and some of her allies far more so. It will be very agreeable to find in that consideration, and still more in her sense of justice, a sufficient motive to an early manifestation of the respect due to our commercial rights. The example would be worthy of the professions which she makes to the world on this subject.\nFebruary 18th Since the above was written, I have been under a degree of indisposition which has suspended the proposed continuation of it, and which now will oblige me to be very brief; the more so, as the vessel has been some days detained, which was engaged for the special purpose of conveying public despatches and private letters to Europe.\nThe delay has enabled me to inform you that Mr Erskine a few days ago communicated by instructions from his Government its late Decrees of Novr. 11, and those forming a sequel to them. The communication was accompanied with assurances that much regret was felt by his Britannic Majesty at the necessity which the conduct of his enemy had created for measures so embarrassing to neutral commerce, and that His Majesty would readily follow an example of relinquishing such a course, or even of making relaxations pari passu with his enemy.\nWhether these intimations have any reference to the distinction between such parts of the French decree as operate municipally on shore, and such as operating on the high seas, violate the rights of neutrals, or to a distinction between the former restriction and the late extension of the Decree with respect to the United States, Mr Erskine did not seem authorized to say. The probability is that neither of these distinctions entered into the views of the British Cabinet. But it is certainly neither less the duty nor the true policy of the Emperor of the French so to vary his decree as to make it consistent with the rights of neutrals and the freedom of the seas, and particularly with his positive stipulations to the United States. This may be the more reasonably expected, as nothing can be more clear, as has been already observed, than that the effect of the Decree, as far as it can be carried into effect, would not be sensibly diminished, by abolishing its operation beyond the limits of the territorial Sovereignty.\nIn remonstrating against the injustice and illegality of the French Decree, I am aware that you may be reminded of antecedent injuries to France and her allies thro\u2019 British violations of neutral commerce. The fact cannot be denied, and may be urged with great force, in our remonstrances against the orders to which Great Britain has given a retaliating character; since the French Decree might on the same ground, be pronounced a retaliation on the preceding conduct of Great Britain. But ought the legitimate commerce of neutrals to be thus the victim and the sport of belligerents contesting with each other the priority of their destructive innovations; and without leaving, either of them, to neutrals, even the opportunity or the time for disproving that culpable acquiescence which is made the pretext by both for the wrongs done to them? And I must repeat that apart from all questions of this nature the French Decree, or at least the illegal extensions of it to the United States remain chargeable with all the impolicy which has been pointed out.\nI find by accounts from Hamburgh, Bremen, Holland and Leghorn, that the trade and property of our Citizens have been much vexed by regulations subaltern to those of the original Decree of Novr. 21. 1806. How far the complaints are founded on proceedings violating our public rights, or on such as are unfriendly and inequitable towards our Citizens who have placed their property within these jurisdictions, you will be able to decide better than we can do at this distance; and the President refers to your own judgment the kind of representation to the French Government which those and other analagous cases may require.\nMr. Rose charged with a special mission to the United States for adjusting and making the satisfaction required for the outrage on the chesapeake Frigate, has been about a month here. He opened his mission with a demand, preliminary to the negotiation, which was inadmissible. Much time and pains have been spent in informal experiments to overcome that difficulty at the threshold, and others known to be within the negotiation itself. These experiments are giving way to formal and direct discussions, which do not under the instructions by which he professes to be restricted, promise any definitive and satisfactory result.\nIt was my purpose to have given greater extent to this communication, and particularly to have touched some other points in your last letters. But I find my health scarcely equal to the task already performed; and I am unwilling to prolong the detention of the vessel which has been ready for some time to depart with the numerous letters from our merchants to their correspondents, for carrying which she was in great measure employed. As she will return to L\u2019Orient from Falmouth, where she will wait 8 or 10 days only, in order to bring back Lieut Lewis the bearer of this, I hope you will dispatch him in due time, and that he will bring from you communications equally ample and agreeable.\nThe inclosed copy of a letter from the Secretary of War to me, together with the papers spoken of in it, will enable you to reply to the Minister of War in answer to his letter of the 15th. Sept. last, a copy of which you sent me. I have the honor to be &c\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2679", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Robert Were Fox, 9 February 1808\nFrom: Fox, Robert Were\nTo: Madison, James\nEsteemed Friend\nFalmouth 9th. Feby: 1808\nI did myself the pleasure of writing thee on the 9th. Ulto Since that time there have arrived at this Port sundry Vessels as Pr. annex\u2019d list.\nThe Hope Captn. Jones & her cargo have been liberated by the Commons, since which the Captors have found onboard her in a trunk belonging to a Passenger sundry dispatches from the French Government to their Officers in the West Indies in consequence of which the Captors have again taken possession of her. The Jane Captn. Hall will I am informed have a Licence to proceed with her Cargo (consisting of Oil, Cocoa, Sugar &ca.) to Spain.\nThe Masters of American Vessels here not under detention continue to be at a great loss how to proceed fearing they will be liable to be Captured if they proceed to any place whatsoever.\nI could at this time deliver onboard at London, Liverpool, or Bristol sheathing Copper & Bolts at 14d. 1/ 2 Pr lb. I am with great respect Thy assured Friend\nRob W. Fox", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2682", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Anderson, 9 February 1808\nFrom: Anderson, James\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nHavana, February the 9th. 1808.\nI have had the honor to address You, under date of the Eleventh Ultimo, by Mr. Vincent Nolte, who left this direct for Baltimore, and obligingly took charge of my letters, covering the returns of the arrivals of American Vessels in this port, from the thirtieth day of June last, to the first of January, present Year, with a list of the deaths of Citizens of The United States, since my letter of the third of October last, and a small packet containing Tobacco seed, which I flatter myself will be duly received.\nI have postponed from day to day writing to Your Excellency, in the hope of having something certain and official to communicate. Since the thirty first of December last, to this day inclusively, not less than One hundred & four American Vessels have arrived in this Port, principally from The United States and New Orleans, the rest from different places. Since we have received the confirmation of the Embargo\u2019s having been laid in the United States, the Executive of this Colony, will not permit any of our Vessels to leave this port with their inward Cargoes, nor will they suffer them to return in balast but oblige the Captains or Consignees, to load them with the produce of this Island, whether it is convenient or not. A report has been in circulation for near three Weeks, that this Government intended to take off the Duties of twelve and an half PCent, on the exportation of Sugar, Coffee, Molasses, &Ca: &Ca: as a small compensation, We presumed, for the rigour of the above Decree Yet to this hour, it has not taken effect, though some of our Vessels have been detained here, expecting that this trifling act of Justice would be granted to them. I fear, that no acts of generosity will be shown, while any of our Vessels remain in port. Allurements may be thrown out afterwards, to induce our Merchants to give this City a preference, but I am convinced, when the object shall be completed, the old System of high Duties will be revived. It is supposed by several well informed persons, that there are at this moment, more than Thirty thousand barrels of flour in this City and Harbour, with a pretty considerable Quantity of Beef, Pork, Wine, dry Goods &Ca. &Ca. & some Lumber; so that unless the Embargo should continue for some Months, it will not be as severely felt in this place, as perhaps it might be politic and desireable for it to do. It is time, Sir, that all the trading Nations of the Earth, should know and feel our Domestic and commercial importance, which would teach them to pay the American people and their flag, more respect than what they do at present. If our Merchants join heart and hand in the support of our Laws, so much good would result from it, and Our Executive would have the power to strike more effectually, wherever it was necessary the blows should fall. There are Yet, One Ship, three Brigs, and a Schooner expected here from New Orleans, with Flour & other articles. When they arrive, it is supposed that all supplies will be cut off, from the United States, during the Embargo. Philadelphia flour has been sold as high as Nineteen dollars Per barrel, and if no arrivals take place, this article, with almost any other, notwithstanding the Quantity on hand, will continue to rise gradually. The consumption of this City & its Neighbourhood is calculated at about Seven thousand barrels of Flour PMonth, four thousand Casks of Wine, Brandy, Oil, &Ca: &Ca: in proportion; and as there are no other Neutrals than Ourselves, a suspension of Commerce for any lenght of time, would be cruelly felt; and when Our Vessels are once departed, the produce of this Island will diminish rapidly in value.\nA few days past, three of our Vessels arrived in this Port from Jamaica in balast. The Embargo was known in that Island before they sailed, and though Kingston was well supplyed with American produce, Flour and other articles, took a rapid rise. They left at Kingston about twenty five Sail of American Vessels; the most of these I expect, will stop here in their way home.\nI have taken the liberty to enclose for Your Excellency\u2019s perusal, an address from The Governor of this Island, to the Inhabitants of this City. Since that period, the greatest Military preparations are making. Cannons, Bombs, Carriage &Ca: &Ca: have been drawn from the Arsenals. The garrisons have been augmented, and numbers of Persons daily employed upon the fortifications. I have heard, that twenty five thousand Militia are to be drawn from different parts of the interior, which with the regular troops, the numerous population of this City and its\u2019 Villages, the strenght of its fortifications, and above all, the real attachment of the people at large, to their Government & Religion will be powerful obstacles in the way of any enemy whatever, who might attempt the conquest of this part of the Island. His Excellency The Governor, is thought to be as good a Soldier as he is a Man, which is saying a great deal in favour of his Military talent.\nI have also taken the liberty to enclose You, Sir, another printed Copy of the entries made at this Custom-House during the last Year. It may not be necessary to observe, that all articles smuggled, have been omitted in the returns made to this Government, but the enclosed statement will enable Your Excellency, to form a just idea of the importance of the trade at this City and Island. With the highest Respect, I have the honor to be, Sir, Your most obedient and much obliged humble Servant,\nJames Anderson", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2684", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Caspar Wistar, 10 February 1808\nFrom: Wistar, Caspar\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nPhilada. Feby 10. 1808\nIt is with great regret that I trespass upon your valuable time, but I cannot well avoid it in the present instance.\nMr. Jacob Otto, a young gentleman of respectable Connections in this City, has embarked for England, for the purpose of arranging some very important Commercial affairs; his friends wish to procure for him a letter of introduction from you to Mr. Pinkney our Minister at London, & on their account I now trouble you with a request for such a letter if you think it proper to write one.\nHaving little personal knowledge of Mr Otto my self, I intimated to his friends the necessity of their Supplying me with Such information as would justify this application, & in consequence of my intimation I received the inclosed letter from Mr. Rob\u2019t Ralston, who is a Merchant of great respectability, & deserving of intire Confidence If under these Circumstances, you Can write to Mr. Pinckney without too much inconvenience, I will be greatly obliged to you, but at any rate I hope you will forgive the trouble I occasion you.\nWith respectful Compliments to Mrs. Maddison, in which Mrs. Wistar joins me, I beg leave to assure you of my best wishes Your friend & servant\nC Wistar Junr", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2685", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Simpson, 10 February 1808\nFrom: Simpson, James\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nTangier 10th. February 1808\nWith No. 126 dated 26th. January, I had the honour of transmitting the Accounts of disbursements in this Consulate and Report of arrival and departure of American Vessels, at the several Ports of this Empire, during last year.\nThe remains of Articles provided for Service, appeared on those Accounts and those purchased since being almost all expended, it becomes necessary to provide more and to obtain a small fund to meet Contingent Expenses; for these purposes I have this day taken the liberty of drawing a Bill on you, to order of Mr. John Gavino for One thousand four hundred Dollars payable thirty days after presentation, which I request you will be pleased to direct being paid and charged for that Service. I have the honour to be Sir Your Most Obedient and Most Humble Servant\nJames Simpson", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2686", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Joy, 10 February 1808\nFrom: Joy, George\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nLondon 10 febry 1808\nHere is a Pamphlet which I have but just had time to read at one Sitting making the Notes stenographically in Pencil as I went along; and hearing immy. after of a sudden Conveyance I have hastily transcribed them in a Coffee House & send them without having time to read them over. I have heard the opinion of 2 or 3 judicious friends on the Work who commend it highly; at which I am the more gratified as I have found nothing in it which I had not inserted in other Words in a Work I had thought of publishing and of which I have given you some Extracts. To save the Conveyance I can only add that I am, very truly Dear Sir, Yr: friend & Servt:\nGeo: Joy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2687", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Zebulon M. Pike, 10 February 1808\nFrom: Pike, Zebulon M.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nWashington City Feby. 10th. 1808.\nBeing informed that the Chevalier Don Fownda Foronda, Charge des affaires from his Catholic Majesty to the United States, has forwarded to your office an account of expenses said to have occurred in consequence of my being obliged to pass thro\u2019 the internal provinces of New Spain, amounting to a sum, exceeding 21,000 Dollars. I have thought it proper to state to you the following circumstances. On my being informed by the Govr. at Santa f\u00e9 that I should be obliged to go to Chihuahua, I addressed a letter to him in which amongst other topics, I demanded to be advised if myself and troops were to be supported at the expense of the U States or his Catholic majesty. On this subject he was silent in his reply, but the day I marched from that city sent me a small sum of money, which I was informed was the subsistence money of my party to Chihuahua, at which place I refunded said sum to an officer of the Govrs. acquaintance & took his receipt for the same. At the seat of government I received $1000 and gave triplicate receipts making my government responsible for the same, and on the close of my correspondence with Genl. Salcedo was informed that I should be conveyed to our territories in the same manner I had been from New Mexico to Chihuahua, That was to find our own subsistence, but all other expences to be paid by the Spanish officers. I left a requisition that my party in the rear might be allowed $2 6 1/4 /100 per diem for their subsistence, and as this was for the support of our troops, when in their country, it remains to be decided by our Govt. whether they will refund the money. At the first place where I changed my escort on this side of Chihuahua, pay was demanded for the services of the mules, and horses, which I positively refused, but finding the officer was embarrassed, I gave him a receipt agreable to the enclosed copy and date. At St. Antonio I received $200 of Govr. Cordero, whereof the account stands enclosed but I presume in justice no part should be allowed except the cash advanced, and the mens subsistence, as agreable to the Chevaliers own maxim, \"the Government which unnecessarily produced the expenditures ought in justice to defray them\". I have the honor to be, Sir, With high consideration Your most obt. Servt.\nZ. M. PikeCaptain\n1 UStates Regt. Infy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2689", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Valentin de Foronda, 10 February 1808\nFrom: Foronda, Valentin de\nTo: Madison, James\nMuy Se\u0148or mio:\nPhiladelphia 10. de Febrero de 1808.\nTengo la honra de remitir \u00e0 V. S. el memorial adjunto de unos Espa\u0148oles, \u00e0 quienes sus intereses llaman a la Havana, y a donde no se puede ir por tierra.\nV. S. ver\u00e0 si la pretension es arreglada \u00e0 los principios adoptados por este Gobierno. Yo no pido el Barco para m\u00ed: Yo me ci\u0148o solo \u00e0 pasar \u00e0 las manos de V. S. el memorial, esperando tendr\u00e1 la bondad de avisarme lo que resuelva su Excella. el Sr. Presidente sobre el asunto, para comunicarlo \u00e0 los Ynteresados. Dios gue. a V. S. ms. as. B. L. M de V S. su mas atento servidor\nValentin de Foronda", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2690", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Israel Smith, 10 February 1808\nFrom: Smith, Israel\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nRutland Febry. 10th. 1808\nI have been informed that James Witherill at present a member of the house of representatives in Congress from this State, is nominated to the President to fill a vacancy in the office of Judge in one of the Territories.I also understand that it would be very gratifying to him and many of his friends to see Such an office confered on him.\nHe has for several years filled the office of Chief Judge of the County Court Rutland County in this State and very much to the Satisfaction of the Public, and the Attornies of the Court where he presided. I think him sufficiently Qualified to do honor to himself, and to give satisfaction to the Public in the office for which I recommend him to the President. Mr. Witherill In my opinion has many Qualification as a Judge which very particularly fit him for the office of Judge in a Territory having been accustomed to the manner, habits, of that description of people which usually first make Settlements in a new or Wilderness Country. I am with the highest respect and Esteem yours\nIsrael Smith", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2691", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 10 February 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\nprivate\nSir,\nLondon Feby 10 1808.\nI send you enclosed a List of the Exportation Duties proposed in the House of Commons by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, sent to me last night by a Member. It will meet with much Opposition.\nCan any thing be imagined more extraordinary than this wide-extended scheme of forcing the Commerce of the World into their ports and subjecting it as it passes to tribute for their own Purposes? I have the Honor to be With sincere Attachment Dr. Sir, Yrs. truly\nWm. Pinkney\n Mr Alexr. Barings pamphlet is also enclosed.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-11-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2692", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Louis-Marie Turreau de Garambouville, 11 February 1808\nFrom: Turreau de Garambouville, Louis-Marie\nTo: Madison, James\nMonsieur,\nWashington 11. F\u00e9vrier 1808\nDes fran\u00e7ais r\u00e9unis \u00e0 NewYork desireraient retourner, les uns en France et les autres dans les Colonies. En cons\u00e9quence, ils sollicitent mon intervention pour obtenir du Gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral la permission de fr\u00eater \u00e0 Newyork deux B\u00e2timents pour les transporter \u00e0 leur destination.\nComme ces deux B\u00e2timents ne doivent porter que les Individus & leurs effets, j\u2019ai pens\u00e9 que je pouvais Sans indiscr\u00e9tion vous faire cette demande, puisqu\u2019elle peut \u00eatre accord\u00e9e Sans offenser la Loi de l\u2019Embargo. Agr\u00e9ez, Monsieur, une nouvelle assurance de ma haute Consid\u00e9ration.\nTurreau", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-11-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2693", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Anonymous, 11 February 1808\nFrom: Anonymous\nTo: Madison, James\nDr. Sir,\nNewYork 11th. Feb. 1808.\nfiled with February 7, 1808\nA grand federal caucus was held at the House of Richard Harisons last evening, composed of Rufus King, Hufman, Pendleton, Riggs, Wolcott, Rey &c&c. Four of the Gentlemen left this for Albany this morning in a Coach & four for the purpoes of forming a coalition with Dewitt Clinton in support of old George for President. The enclosed production I believe to be their sentiments. De Witt I think corrupt enough to unite with them. The old man, I trust will profit by the expereance of a Jefferson & the folly of a Burr. He will know full well how to appresiate the hollow professions of the Chiefs of the federal party, and that their friendship entails destruction on its object. Be that as it may I hope & trust that correct republican principle will prevail in this State & crush all ambitious combinations. I am in the daily receipt of information from Albany and shall transmitt any occurence worthy of notice. De Witt it appears does not controul Tompkins & his council. Yours with esteem & respect\nH.\nThey calculate on Monroe in their interest Could he not be secured in on of the offices of the Heads of Department\nH.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2694", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Joy, 12 February 1808\nFrom: Joy, George\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nLondon 12th Feby: 1808\nYesterday, and not before, I recd. your very acceptable favor of the 12th. Decr. Ult:. I am greatly obliged by the commission contained therein, as well as the flattering manner in which it is conveyed. I beg the favor of you to make my acknowledgements to the President & Senate, which are not the less due on account of the circumstances which render the prosecution of the trust at this moment impossible. Whenever the obstacles are removed that render even the approach to Holland, in a suitable manner, impracticable, I shall not delay my Embarkation. The state of interdiction that exists at present, I trust cannot last long; tho\u2019 all conjecture relative to its termination, in the present temper of Europe, must be vague. It is fortunate perhaps that this state of things, while it precludes the aid that I might otherwise, afford, renders that aid even less necessary than before the appointment took place. Wherever I may be I shall continue my endeavours to possess you with such useful information as may be within my reach; and I shall rejoice at all times if it shall be found of any utility; being very respectfully Dear Sir, Your friend & Servt\nGeo: Joy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-13-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2696", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Lee, 13 February 1808\nFrom: Lee, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nBordeaux february 13: 1808.\nI have the honor to transmit you a letter, I received some days since from Genl. Armstrong. He announces, in a letter I have this day received from him, other dispatches, which he wishes sent by this Vessel, but the fear of an embargo, or the promulgation, of a decree, similar, to that of the King of Holland, will not permit the captain to wait for them. If they should reach me in the course of tomorrow, I will dispatch a boat after the Vessel.\nI have thought it advisable in the present state of things, to send you the inclosed list of such of our Vessels as are detained under various pretences, in the ports of this Country, and Spain. It is as perfect as my information at present admits of. No decision has yet been had on any of them, and I stated to you in my respects of the 27 Ulto: the opinion of General Armstrong, which it may not come amiss to repeat here viz \"I have (says he) assurances that the capture of our Vessels under the Decree of the 17th December, like those under that of the 21 Novr. 1806 will operate only as detentions.\" The general opinion here is, that all depends on the measures we shall adopt against Great Britain If they are pleasing to the Emperor, his prize court will be instructed accordingly. If otherwise it is thought they will all be condemned. Numerous privateers are fitting out in this, and the neighbouring ports, and I should not be surprised to find, the number of captures considerably increased in a short time.\nI am again besieged with sailors, who are flocking to me, from all quarters. When they get well collected together, I shall take some measures through General Armstrong and Mr. Pinkney to both of whom I have already written on the subject, to prevent their becoming a burthen to the United States. A ship could now be chartered to convey them to the United States at a low rate but, I do not think it prudent to adopt this mode at the present crisis, without the advice of Genl. Armstrong, and something from Mr. Pinkney which will protect them from British cruisers.\nThe Rochfort squadron has escaped out of port, and arrived in the vicinity of Toulon. At Toulon we are told several ships of the line are preparing for sea, and it is reported the Brest fleet have sailed. The Emperor is hourly expected here. More of his guards have arrived, and his other troops continue passing. A new conscription has been called as you will see by the papers I have forwarded you. What his present object is, no one can divine.\nThe moment I am closing this letter intelligence is recd. of an embargo, in the U. S. a measure which we have been expecting for some time. It is to be hoped it will be continued until both these nations shall be brought to reason and taught to respect an honest Government.\n With great consideration I have the honor to remain Your Obt St.\nWm. Lee", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-13-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2697", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Josef Yznardy, 13 February 1808\nFrom: Yznardy, Josef\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nCadiz 13. February 1808.\nThis Government has taken no determination as yet, respecting the following Vessels detained in the Port of Algeziras, in consequence of the Decree of the 8th. ultimo.\n Mary Thos. Hunt Sugar &ca. from Philadelphia\n Zacharias David Lufkin Fish from Newberryport\n Helena Leml. Foster Flour & Pork Boston.\n Seaman T. B. Lasher Sugar Tobacco & ca. New York. This Vessel & Cargo was lost in a gale of Wind suffer\u2019d on the 6 instant.\n Jersey Wm. Saul Flour, Pork & staves Philadelpa.\n Augusta Elias Davis Flour & Biscuit Boston.\n Eliza John Brown Rice, flour &ca. Baltimore.\nI have the pleasure to enclose you a paragraph of a Letter received day from Mr. Peter Porral our Agent at Algeziras by which you will be informed that in consequence of my representation a stop has been put to the proceedings at Algeziras. With sentiments of high consideration, \nI am very truly, Sir, Your most obedt. Servant,\nJosef Yznardy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-13-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2698", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Fulwar Skipwith, 13 February 1808\nFrom: Skipwith, Fulwar\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nParis 13 Feby. 1808\nOwing to the great uncertainty in the conveyances at this time to the United States I send herewith triplicite copies of my two letters to you of the 23d. Ulto. & the 1st. Inst., together with copies of the two letters, mentioned in that of the 1st. Inst., from the Minister of the Marine to the Prefect of L\u2019Orient concerning the affair of the Caliope. This case as well as the Cases of seven other Vessels belonging to the United States, which have been either siesed in port, or captured at sea, under the late decrees of his Majesty the Emperor, are already before the Council of Prizes & preparing in the accustomed mode for trial; but the Attorney, in behalf of the Government, I am happy to add, assures my lawyer that he is about to demand that the Council of Prizes should refer the whole of the Cases coming within the purview of the late decrees to the Grand Juge, minister of Justice; so that hopes are entertained of all Vessels & Cargos so siesed being released. This, however, in my opinion, as suggested in one of my former letters, will depend on the measures of Congress in relation to G. Britain.\nI subjoin copies of two letters which have passed between Genl. Armstrong & myself on the subject of my entering a defence in behalf of such Captains, captured under the late decrees as may not be in a situation to act themselves, or through their special Agents. I add, also, a copy of the letter which in consequence of the General\u2019s letter to me I have thought it my duty to write to my Colleagues & others who have already addressed to me cases of the above description. I remain with great consideration & respect Sir, Your Mo Ob. Servt.\nFulwar Skipwith", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-14-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2700", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Taylor, 14 February 1808\nFrom: Taylor, James\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nNo. Carolina febry. 14th, 1807\nOn the 12th, Ulto, the Brig Jacob, N W. Easton Master from Bordeaux bound to Baltimore was cast away on the banks of this Coast; among a number of Articles on board; of which the Captain had no Invoices, are five boxes marked JMB two boxes marked JMC, and two barrels; part of which are directed for you, and part for the President. In the discharge of my official duties, I was obliged to take possession of a large and valuable part of the Cargo; this portion I took charge of for the purpose of forwarding them to you by the first opportunity which shall be done; may I solicit Sir, that you transmit me the Invoices of them (if they are articles subject to duty) as early as convenient, that I may make my Returns to the Treasury department. I would not have them opened, and they are now Safe in NewBern in a fire proof Store. With Sentiments of the highest Respect, I have the honor to be Sir Yr. Ob Servt.\nJames TaylorCollector district Ocracoke", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-14-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2701", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Henry Rose, 14 February 1808\nFrom: Rose, George Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nSunday February 14th. 1808\nMr. Rose will do himself the honor of waiting upon Mr. Madison at his house at 2 o\u2019clock, this afternoon.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2703", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Armstrong, Jr., 15 February 1808\nFrom: Armstrong, John, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nParis 15 february 1808.\nWith other documents I send you a copy of Mr. Irving\u2019s last letter to me and am, Sir, With very high respect and consideration, Your most obedient and very humble Servant,\nJohn Armstrong\nP. S. If you think proper you may make the messenger some compensation for his time. For his Expences I have already advanced twelve hundred francs.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-16-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2704", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Gavino, 16 February 1808\nFrom: Gavino, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nGibraltar 16. feby. 1808\nNot being honourd with any of yours since my last of 4: Inst. Pr Copy herewith to which referr, The Commander in Chief continued inflexible in his Determination regarding Colonial Produce being only Cleard for England.\nThe Tryals of the Quantigo Bay Cook has come on, also the Calisto both wch. have been Cleard, and with regard to the Neptune, one Eighth salvage has been alowd the Captors. We have lately had a Severe Gale of Wind which Occasiond several Vessels going to Sea. It was from East, when the Ship two Brothers from Leghorn in Ballast was lost, likewise the Brig Minerva of Charleston from Alicante with Wine, & the Brig Mary of Boston with Sugar, Capn. Davis. The two formers are totaly lost. Of the latter, the Cargo is saved, as are the Crews of all of them.\nI have this day drawn a Bill on you 30 % order the Honourable Secretary of the Navy Pr $5272:55 Cents being the Ballance of my Account with that Department, which please honour & get passed to my Debit as in part of my reimburse for my remittance in Coll. Lears Bills I have the honour to be\nJohn Gavino\nP. S. I have this day further drawn on you 30% a Bill order Mr. Thomas Higinbotham for $697:53 Cents which please honour & place against the remittances made in Coll. Lears Bill.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-16-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2705", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John B. Colvin, 16 February 1808\nFrom: Colvin, John B.\nTo: Madison, James\nHonorable Sir,\nTuesday Morning, Feb. 16. 1808.\nI inclose the \"Enquirer\". It contains an allusion to you which cannot fail to attract the attention of your enemies. As I have appeared your advocate before the public, I should like extremely to learn from indubitable authority in what way I am to understand Mr. Ritchie; & whether I am to take his statement & his suggestions relative to yourself & the secretary of the treasury as fact. In my own opinion, Mr. Ritchie has been most unfortunate in the idea of his \"bitter regret.\" You will perceive, Sir, the inference that may be drawn from it by your foes. I wish to take a tenable position. And if, in my zeal to serve you, this letter should be considered too bold, I trust you will attribute it to the true cause. I am, Sir, with the highest respect, Your very humble servant,\nJ. B. Colvin", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2706", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Charles Coles Claiborne, 17 February 1808\nFrom: Claiborne, William Charles Coles\nTo: Madison, James\nSir!\nNew-Orleans Feby. 17th. 1808.\nInclosed is a translation of a letter addressed to me by Governor Folch together with a Copy of the answer which (after consulting with the Collector of the District of Orleans) I returned thereto. If an uninterrupted passage for Spanish Vessels to and from B\u00e2ton Rouge was permitted; or if the provisions of the Embargo Act, as regards our intercourse with the Inhabitants of the Florida\u2019s be not inforced, B\u00e2ton Rouge, Mobile & Pensacola will become places of deposit for the Western produce, and from thence, it will be exported to Havanna\u2019 & other Spanish Ports.\nThe desire expressed by Governor Folch to remove certain Military stores from B\u00e2ton Rouge is probably Sincere; But if permission had been granted him to purchase (for that purpose) two or more Vessels in New Orleans, I suspect the occasion would have been embraced to have conveyed also to Pensacola a supply of Flower & other provisions.\nI trust my answer will be approved; It is couched in general terms and my conduct in relation to our intercourse with our Spanish neighbours will (under the circumstances of the case) be directed by a prudent discretion, until the instructions of the President shall be made known to me.\nAn English Sloop of War is at Anchor near the Balize, with a design (as is supposed) to intercept several Vessels expected daily from Vera-Crux with rich cargo\u2019s. I am Sir, with great respect, yo: mo: hble servt.\nWilliam C. C. Claiborne", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2707", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Charles Coles Claiborne, 17 February 1808\nFrom: Claiborne, William Charles Coles\nTo: Madison, James\nPrivate\nDear Sir!\nNew Orleans, Feby. 17th. 1808.\nGeneral Moreau & Governor Folch continue in this City, and have contracted a great intimacy; perhaps their objects may be perfectly innocent, but I am not without my suspicions. I know not when Moreau will depart; at one time, he proposed taking a passage in the first Vessel for Charleston; at another, he designed passing by Land, the nearest and best route to Georgia and from thence thro\u2019 the Southern & middle States to New-York, where he expected to meet his Lady early in the spring; But now it is understood, that he proposes to pass some time at Pensacola with his friend Folch, previous to his return to the Northward, and that the period of his departure from hence is uncertain. From a conversation which I had with Genl. Moreau he seemed to have been well apprised of an approaching Revolution in Spain; Folch also anticipated the event, & expressed to me his determination to acknowledge no sovereign, not descended from the reigning family; My impression, therefore now is, that the probable event of the dethronement of the King of Spain, has brought Moreau to this Territory, and that he (with Folch) contemplates assisting in establishing a seperate Government in Mexico. I have the honor to be, with great Esteem & respect yo: mo: obt. Servt.\nWilliam C. C. Claiborne", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2709", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Armstrong, Jr., 17 February 1808\nFrom: Armstrong, John, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nParis 17 february 1808.\nInclosed is a copy of the answer from the Minister of Marine to my letter of the 13 instant in relation to the sale of a part of the Cargo of the Ship James Adams. It would now appear, that the promises of forbearance made by another Department, are applicable only to vessels sequestered in the Ports, and not to such as have been captured at Sea.\nI omitted mentioning in my letter of the 15th., the outlawry of our Commerce by the King of Holland. His ports are only open to us in a storm and while that lasts, we are to be regarded as Prisoners. It is not easy to explain such outrageous policy. Our\u2019s, in being more temperate, will not, I flatter myself, be less firm. With the highest respect, I am, Sir, Your most obedient & very humble servant\nJArmstrong", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2710", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 17 February 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\nprivate\nDear Sir\nLondon, Feby. 17th. 1808\nI send you enclosed a Duplicate of my public Letter of the 2d. Instant, and by the same opportunity the interesting Correspondence between the Danish Charg\u00e9 d\u2019Affaires and Lord Howick, in March last, relative to the British orders in Council of the 7th. of Jany. 1807; together with printed Copies of some other papers laid before Parliament, and Packets of Newspapers & Pamphlets.\nYou will find in one of the Newspapers a very inadequate Report of the Debate of the Night before last, in the House of Lords, on the orders of the 11th. of November. I was present at that Debate, and was delighted with the admirable Speech of Lord Grenville. It was one of the most masterly I have ever heard in any Assembly, and produced a visible Effect. The Lord Chancellor\u2019s Speech contained many much stronger Protestations than are stated in the Newspaper Report (given, too, with infinite Solemnity & Earnestness) of his Anxiety to avoid a Rupture with us; and of his Conviction of the vast Importance of American Connection to Great Britain, and even of the Policy of promoting our Prosperity in all its Bearings, as being eminently conducive to their own. That Anxiety and that Conviction are now felt, or affected every where. Nothing could be more impressive than Lord Grenville\u2019s eloquent display of his own Feelings & opinions upon that Subject. I have the Honor to be with sincere Attachment Dear Sir your most Obed Hble Serv\nWm. Pinkney\nP. S. Baron Alopeus sent me, before he left Town, the enclosed Letter, with a Request that I wd. forward it to America. May I beg that it may be sent to its Address?\nHe called on me a few Days ago, and I had a short Conversation with him. His Call was merely to take Leave.\nYou will of course observe that Mr. Percival\u2019s Resolutions (of which a Copy has already been transmitted to you) propose an Export Duty upon warehoused Tobacco, Pot & Pearl Ashes &c. &c. as well as upon Cotton. Upon Tobacco the Duty is heavy. All this seems to be inconsistent with the uniform professions of the Government, and for that Reason I am not sure that I understand the Resolutions. Others, who ought to understand them, have been as much surprized at this Feature in them as I have been and comprehend them as I do. I shall obtain such an Explanation of them today as I can confide in, and will make you acquainted with it. A Duplicate of the Resolutions will be found in one of the Packets now sent. We seem to be considered as a most patient People.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2711", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Henry Hill, 17 February 1808\nFrom: Hill, Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nNewYork feby. 17th. 1808\nThe Royal family of Portugal having embarked for Brazil, this extensive and rich Country is about to change its Colonial dynasty for an independent sovereignty, a circumstance which it is presumed will give a strong impulse and a new direction to its commerce.\nPersuaded that the government of the U. States will not remain idle and indifferent spectators of an event so extraordinary, and being well convinced of the disposition of the President and of your willingness, Sir, on all occasions to listen to any communication which has for its object the interest and prosperity of our Country; I take the liberty of addressing through you to the President, some suggestions which have occured to my mind, with respect to the opening of a commercial intercourse between the United States and the Brazils.\nTwo important objects appear to me to be obtainable, in that regard, essential to the future political and commercial interests of the United States. First, by treaty with the Prince Regent to obtain a liberty of trade with the Brazils on a liberal footing, which would greatly enrich and extend our commerce. And secondly, thereby prevent the British from Monopolizing that trade, which is grasped at by Great Britain and would materially lessen her dependence on the United States.\nIt is difficult to say, what will be the precise nature of the policy and government about to be established over the Brazils; but it is presumeable it will not be essentially different from what it has been in Portugal since the reign of the House of Braganza, as all the appendages of an old and corrupt Monarchy, will still adhere to the Prince, and he will carry with him all the prejudices and shackles of Royalty and the Catholic Religion, to a Country involved in a tyranny still more oppressive, and enveloped in a superstition less lucid and tolerant, than existed, if possible, in Portugal.\nBut, he will have a greater scope for action and self-control, than when pent up in a narrow strip of territory surrounded by sovereigns more portant than himself, where he durst not move from the beaten track of his ancestors, lest he should incur the displeasure of his more powerful neighbors, which occasioned an insuperable languor and inactivity in every feature of the Portuguese government and character, and although it is probable there will be no important change by the removal to Brazil in the Political or Hierarchical dynasty of the Portuguese Monarchy, yet it is believed the interests of that Country, which may justly be said to be in an infant state in improvements and commerce, will be so far discernible and promoted, that a liberal system of commercial policy will be established, and that few obstacles would be presented to a liberal commercial arrangement with the United States.\nThis, Sir, is fully my own opinion, first, because it would be an exceedingly popular policy with the subjects of the Prince, whom he will have strong motives to oblige, and who have a fondness for inland traffic and an insatiable avarice for gains acquired in this way, or in any other without great labor, not surpassed perhaps by the Spaniards themselves.\nSecondly, because his dominions are environed by the settlements of Spain, whose inhabitants are restricted and oppressed by a rigid colonial policy, and the Prince will no doubt perceive the advantage of rendering his Ports emporiums for foreign Merchandize, (which he can only do by a liberal system with foreign Nations,) in order to intice the Spaniards of Laplata and other provinces,) to trade with, and settle in his Dominions. And it would be the means also of attatching more firmly to his interests, the Indian tribes on his Northern and western frontier, who are very numerous & powerful, and their friendship, will be not less important to the interests of his new Kingdom, than their trade.\nThirdly, because he will find himself in a country destitute of most of the luxuries and conveniences of life, which himself and his courtiers have been accustomed to in Europe, A Country which heretofore has been made to depend on the Mother Country for all its artificial, and most of its necessary wants, which will now experience an increased demand for them, and can only be furnished by commerce with foreign Nations.\nIndeed, Sir, I can perceive nothing at present within the scope of my apprehension, which should opperate against, but much which in my opinion would facilitate a negotiation between the government of this Country and the Prince, who in his misfortunes would be consoled and flattered with the attention of the President, except that, Great Britain would undoubtedly interfere and do all in her power to prevent it, in order to obtain for herself an ascendancy over the Brazilian Court, and a Monopoly of the trade and wealth of that Country.\nIt is not unlikely that the Prince, from the intimate connexion which so long has subsisted between Portugal and G. Britain, and from a consideration also of recent favors received from this Nation, may be disposed to favor her in some points of trade; and promises may have been extorted from him to this effect.\nBut as the gratitude of Princes is not lasting, whatever may have been the extorted or voluntary promises of the prince, or his predilections in her favor when he left Portugal, on finding himself in a new country, remote from, and not in a situation to be overawed and dictated to, by any European power; in a Country, of which perhaps he had not foreseen the wants and interest; it is presumeable he will not compromit his independence, by a treaty with Great Britain which should give her important exclusive priviledges, particularly after having lost one Kingdom by a similar course of policy; and more especially, should he receive instant overtures and proffers of friendship from the United States, which would relieve him from any serious apprehensions he may entertain, that Great Britain alone is his friend, and can supply the wants of his subjects.\nI shall endeavor to point out, Sir, wherein in my opinion in the commerce of the Brazils, Great Britain could not compete with the United States, nor supply the wants of that Empire.\nFirst, however, it will be necessary to show in what manner according to my apprehension, her dependence on us will be materially lessened, by suffering her to engross the friendship of the Prince, and monopolize the trade of the Brazils; which she will do if our government does not interfere to prevent; and I presume it is not considered bad policy, to hold her to her present dependent state on the commerce of the United States, since it sets bounds to her rapacity, and holds her hostile disposition towards us in check.\nWe probably receive more than one third of the greatest amount in her manufactures Pr. ann she ever exported in one year. We supply her with near three fourths of the cotton she manufactures, and with other raw-materials to a large amount, which put in motion her manufacturing labor, and the most important branches of her trade; and her W. India possessions may be said to be totally dependent on the United States, for their necessary supplies of provisions & lumber.\nHer uneasiness under this state of increasing dependence and anxiety to shake it off, it strikes me is very visible in all her conduct.\nIt is to this, perhaps, we may attribute her known participation in Mirandas vile scheme, her supposed interest in the Burr conspiracy, and her attempt against the Province of Buenes-Ayres, in hopes to open some other source for her supplies, and to find a new channel for her Manufactures.\nI think, Sir, I now see the same policy which dictated those views, extending itself to the Brazils; where if she is not counteracted by a competition with our commerce, she may introduce her manufactures in a very short period to as large an amount as we now receive from her, obtain Cotton, tobacco and other raw-materials she now draws from us, and also supplies of bread-stuff, and Beef, for her W. India Possessions.\nThe productions of Brazil, which have hitherto been exported from thence in any considerable quantity, if I am rightly informed are, besides the precious metals and gems, Sugar, tobacco, Cotton, Hides, dye and cabinet woods, some coffee, indigo & rice; and some jerked-beef. It has hitherto been partially dependent on Europe for flour &c, but has a variety of soil and climate, adapted to productions of every kind.\nAll those articles of export, have generally been sent, to Portugal. The most inferior quality of tobacco, however, and some specie, goes to the Portuguese settlements in africa, and much of the former article is smuggled into the province of Laplata. The export of jerked-beef has ever been very inconsiderable, and can not made in any quantity, as I understand, except in the most southern and Northern provinces, bordering on the great rivers Laplata and Maraquin.\nIt may there be made in almost any quantity, where the number of Cattle is immense; but I am informed that both at Rio-Janeiro & St. Salvador, that article is generally scarce and high, owing to the distance from which it is brought thither and the paucity of Horned-Cattle near those commercial cities.\nCotton, although not hitherto exported to an extent beyond 20. or 25,000 quintals, may be raised no doubt in particular districts, to supply the most extensive demand for it; and of a superior quality.\nGreat Britain would have a very different object in her commerce with the Brazils, from that which should be the policy of the United States.\nShe would not want its sugar, which of all its productions is the most considerable, as her own colonies produce more than she can find a Market for to advantage. Whilst therefore she would discourage the raising of this article and of others which her colnies furnish her, she would stimulate the raising of cotton, indigo, tobacco, arnotto, and the procuring of dye-woods and Hides, for her home manufactures; and the cultivation of wheat, corn, and rice, and the making of jerked-beef, for the supply of her W. India possessions.\nPine lumber and staves she can never procure from that quarter, and her colonies must ever be dependent on the United States in a great measure for those articles.\nNeither have I any idea she will ever be able to procure flour, corn, rice &c from the Brazils, for the supply of her colonies, at least on such terms as would affect our commerce with them in those articles. But the jerked-beef of that Country would supercede in the British Colonies the necessity of every kind of salted fish, which is the principal viand food of their Negroes, and which she draws chiefly from the United States.\nTherefore, Sir, I would suggest that a commercial treaty between this Country and the Brazils, should stipulate for the admission of our own productions free of duty, altho\u2019 we might pay higher in consequence, upon foreign Manufactures.\nI doubt not this would have the effect in a very considerable degree to prevent the Brazilians from increasing their produce in grain and pulse, particularly near the seaports, since our commerce would pour in upon them those articles in a manner to increase their consumption, and sattisfy their wants; and we could furnish them on better terms than they could afford to raise them and of a superior quality.\nAs respects the article of jerked-beef, we could afford to pay so much more for it than the British, to carry to Cuba, (which Island under existing circumstances is entirely dependent on the United States, and requires of that article according to a report of the Cabildo of Havana in 1799, three hundred and seventy five thousand anolies Pr. ann.) that we should prevent it from being carried to the British Islands.\nAnd as regards the articles of cotton, Indigo, Tobacco, Arnotto, dye-woods & Hides, by increasing the demand for, and augmenting the prices of sugar and coffee, our commerce would naturally have the effect to suppress in some measure the increase of those articles, and so long as we are allowed to carry them to the Continent of Europe, we should take more of them, and could afford to pay higher prices, than the British.\nBut, there are other considerations deserving of notice, which will naturally render cultivation in Brazil exceedingly languid, and deter the Brazilians from entering into any new branches.\n1st. Their confirmed indolence and want of enterprize, and the difficulty of diverting any people from long established habits and deep rooted prejudices, more especially the Brazilians, who are more firmly fixed in them, perhaps, & to which they adhere with more obdurate tenacity, than the people of any other Country.\n2d. The nature of the government too, will unquestionably be of that character, as to offer little encouragement to the agriculturist. When he is subjected to the heavy and direct taxes of tythes, and to the impudence and rapacity of a profligate clergy and unfeeling tax-gatherers, who may dictate the proper season for harvest, invade his Estate and take one sheaf out of every ten of his gathered wheat, all stimulus to industry is deadened; and the poor farmer feels it vain to think of profit, but only of bare subsistence and the quiet of an indolent life, rather than work, to be plundered of the fruits of his labor.\n3d. In South America, where slavery abounds and is rendered necessary by climate and habit, the toilsome, and compared to other cultures, the uncertain and unprofitable cultivation of grain & pulse is depressed, because it is only the poor man who has but a few slaves and a small tract of land, who will think of cultivating articles of small value for a market, while the rich slave-holders direct their attention to the more valueable and profitable productions of sugar and coffee, where the soil is adapted to them, and if not, Cotton, Indigo &c, and as these in all cases hold the principal part of the land convenient to the seaports or water conveyances, the cultivators of other articles are those only, remote from commercial places, and have a lengthy and tedious land carriage, to convey their produce to the respective markets.\nThis is the case in Mexico and Santa-f\u00e9 (vice Royalty) of which the principal commercial ports are veracruz and Carthagena; from whence in time of peace considerable quantities of flour is exported to their sister Colonies; but at prices never less than from 30 to 50 Pr.Ct. higher than in the United States, which is occasioned principally by the charge of land carriage, and is of far inferior quality to ours.\nThe same causes we may reasonably conclude opperate in the Brazils in a more essential degree, since the lands there are in fewer hands and the holders are comparatively more wealthy, and the poor land holders are proportionably more employed in a pastoral life.\n4th. But the Mines of Brazil, as well as of Mexico and other Spanish colonies, will ever be a great impediment to agriculture. The precious metals sharpen the avidity, whilst they increase the idle and desultory habits of men, and in Countries where they abound many persons are alternately employed in hunting for the veins which contain them. Where one person discovers a vein which enriches him, an hundred perhaps spend their lives, and many lose fortunes, in a fruitless pursuit. But still the incentive is not weakened, for perhaps there is no stronger passion in man than self-confidence in success, when there is a possible chance of obtaining a high prize; this is evinced among us in our lotteries, and by the Spaniards and Portuguese in their ardent pursuits in search of the rich ores. And the greater the demand for specie, which is occasioned by the increase of commerce, from whence our artificial wants and luxuries arise, the more industriously are the mines wrought, and sought after with more assiduity. Hence, in Mexico, since the regulations of Spain in 1778, which opened to her colonies a more liberal commerce with the Mother Country and vastly increased the imports to VeraCruz, the product of the mines has augmented about one third, whilst the agricultural productions have remained nearly stationary, and it is obvious that the greater the increase of the mines, the less value will be put upon articles produced by cultivation and the profit of agriculture is thereby lessened.\nHaving now stated, Sir, what has appeared to me proper with respect to the important object of countervailing the British commerce with the Brazils, that her dependence on the United States shall not be thereby materially lessened; I shall proceed to point out wherein in my opinion she cannot compete with us in that commerce.\nI understand the demands of that Country will chiefly consist, first, in our own productions, of flour & corn meal, corn, peas and beans, dried and salted fish, Beef and Pork (for their Navy and Merchant vessels) tar, pitch, and turpentine, pine lumber, and cheese & butter. And secondly of foreign goods, Broadcloths, Kerseymeres, Serges, Coatings, Flannels, Baizes, Bombazeens, Camlets, Cotton Callicoes, chintz, Dimities, Muslins, Muslinetts, Velverets, Corderoys, Marseilles, Jeans, and stockings, Linnen printed Callicoes, Cambrics, Estopillas, Brita\u00f1os, Platillas, Hollands, Irish Linnen, thread, stockings, sheetings, Rolls, Cr\u00e9as, Osnaburghs, Dowlas and other coarse linnen goods, Lawns and laces, Taffaties, Tapestry, Sattins & sattinetts, twistings, silk stockings, raw silk, Velvets and most kind of Silk stuffs of every description, Perfumeries, Spices, some teas, Nankeens and Porcelain, Medicinal drugs of various kinds, Quicksilver, Tin plates and ware, Copper-sheets, Iron and steel, Canvass and Ravens Duck, Cordage, agricultural implements and utensils, Machinery for Sugar works, Cutlery, hardware, Crockery & Glassware, watches, and various kinds of jewelry, trinkets and fancy goods, Lisbon, Port, Madeira, Bordeaux and other wines, French and Spanish brandy, olive oil, olives and most other of the preserved fruits of the south of Europe.\nSuch are the principal articles which it is believed the market of Brazil will demand.\nWith respect to such as consist of our own productions, no Nation can compete with us in a foreign market.\nThe other goods may be classed as follows: 1. The Manufactures of Great Britain, 2. of Germany and Prussia, 3. of France and Holland, 4. of Spain and Italy, 5 of China and India, 6. of Russia, and 7. of Portugal.\nWhat value would be required in such foreign Merchandize, or of our own productions, my information is not sufficiently accurate to determine, with any degree of precision, nor of the comparative value the goods of the respective Countries would bear to each other. But I shall presume the account would stand thus:\n1st. of our own productions\u2014\u2014$2.000.0002. In the Manufactures of Great Britain including her possessions in India\u2014\u2014}6.000.0003. In the Manufactures & productions of Germany, France, Holland, Prussia, Russia, Spain, Italy and Portugal, which I unite, since they are now pretty much amalgamated as to their commercial policy\u2014\u2014}12.000.0004.China and India\u2014\u20142,000.000$22.000.000\nGreat Britain in time of peace, would have an advantage over us perhaps, in those articles which consists of her own Manufactures, as in most woolen and cotton goods; tin, Copper, agricultural implements and Machinery for sugar works; Cutlery, hard-ware Crockery and Glass-ware; and in India Cottons also, since our commerce is not admitted in her E. Indian Ports on an equal footing. But under existing circumstances, on account of the war charges upon her commerce, we could carry her own Manufactures to the Brazils and sell them cheaper than her Merchants. And as respects the important article of fine cloths, the Superfines of France and Spain which we should carry thither, would exclude hers in a great degree. There are some kinds of cottons likewise to be obtained in france of a superior quality, and on better terms, than in England; as stockings, Dimities and Muslinetts.\nBut in the Hempen and flaxen goods of Russia, in Iron, steel and Quicksilver, in the linnens of Prussia, Germany, Holland and France, in the silk stuffs, perfumeries, Jewelry and fancy goods of this latter country, of Spain, Italy and China, in the important articles of Nankeens and the spices of the East, in most kinds of Medicinal drugs and porcelain, in the wines, brandies, and preserved fruits of Europe; and indeed in almost every article not particularly the fabric of Great Britain, she cannot trade with us at any time, in any foreign Market when she has not exclusive priviledges, upon a footing of equality.\nUnder present circumstances she cannot supply the Brazils with but very few of the enumerated articles of our own productions, or of those which are of the Manufactures of the Continent of Europe; and the shipping of Portugal are excluded from that quarter and are otherwise inadequate to furnish that country.\nGreat Britain might, indeed, if our commerce is not permitted with the Brazils, push off the more of her flimsy Scotch and Irish linnen goods to that Country, and many of her cotton goods would take place of the German and other linnens of the Continent; but that supply would soon fail, since she can no longer draw flax from the Countries on the Baltic, and the failure of a supply of seed to Ireland, will cause a cessation in the Manufactures of that Island.\nBefore her commerce was occluded from the Hanseatic towns and from the ports of Russia, Prussia and Denmark, and Trieste on the adriatic, we imported the Manufactures of those Countries particularly Silesian and German Linnens, & delivered them in the Spanish W. India Markets at about the same price, that the British Merchants in Jamaica afforded them; on account of the high duties and charges principally those goods are obliged to pay on passing through England.\nIt will not be denied but we can deliver in like manner to any W. Indian Market, the goods of China and even British India, as also those of France or other Countries on the continent of Europe at any time, on better terms than the British Merchants. But more especially under the present circumstances in which she is placed, if we are suffered to enjoy a state of Neutrality and permitted a trade on an equal footing with the Brazils, Great Britain cannot compete with us in that Market, in any respect whatever.\nIn a commercial treaty between this country and the Brazils, it would likewise be proper to stipulate for the permission of a direct trade by our ships between the Brazilian Ports and China, and for the admission of our whaling vessels, either for outfits, sales or supplies.\nHaving now, Sir, stated such suggestions as have occurred to me and as appeared of importance in relation to the extraordinary event which gave rise to them, and to the interests of our Country, which no doubt however have arisen to your own mind, and entered into the expansive and lucid view of the President, tho\u2019 not perhaps exactly in the same light I have taken them in detail; Permit me to add, it would give me the greatest sattisfaction if to himself, or you sir, this communication should be in any respect sattisfactory. I have the honor to be, Sir, very respectfully Your Mo. ob. Servt.\nHenry Hill Jr.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2712", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Robert Brent, 17 February 1808\nFrom: Brent, Robert\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nCity of Washn. Feby. 17th. 1808\nMrs. Barry now of New York, a Lady of the most amiable Character, has met with severe afflections since she left this City, in the Death of her Husband and her Daughter. Her only remaining one is pronounced to be in a decline. Her Husband, before his Death, had been recommended to take a Voyage to Madeira, for the benefit of his own and his Daughters Health, and had actually made a contract, I am informed, for the purchase of a Ship for this purpose; not so much with the hope that his own health would be restored, which was too far gone, but that it might restore the health of his Daughter, who was most tenderly beloved by him. The Embargo however frustrated his hopes and he soon died.\nI am now applied to, to solicit the president under the present distressing circumstances of Mrs. Barry, to permit her to go, and take her Daughter with her to Madeira in a Vessell carrying nothing but Ballast and provisions for the Voyage, if he should be of opinion that the Law has given him any discretionary power on the subject.\nMrs. Barry considers the life of her Daughter as entirely dependent on this Indulgence, and I can venture to say that her gratitude would be fully equal to the Boon.\nSuch security will be given as may be quite satisfactory that nothing will be shipt in the Vessell but provisions & necessary Stores. I have the honor to be with sentiments of perfect respect Dear Sir Your Obt. Ser\nRobert Brent", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2713", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Thomas Fitzsimmons, 18 February 1808\nFrom: Fitzsimmons, Thomas\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nPhilada. Chamber of Commerce February 18th. 1808\nThere has Just been published here, a decree of the Emperor and King, dated at Milan, on the 11th. of December last, which (altho Unauthenticated) taken in Conniction with his decree of November 1806, and other Circumstances, is beleived to be substantially Correct It has had the effect of Creating great Anxiety Among the Merchants of this City, particularly those Concerned, in the trade to India, as it is understood to Subject to Capture all Vessels, bound to or Coming from any of the British Possessions\nThe property at Risk, to and from Ports, beyond the Cape of Good hope is that Which is likely to be most Affected by this decree. It is very large on most of it now on its return home. The ships are without the means of defence, and the Captains unapprized, of any danger, from French Cruizers\nUnder these circumstances, the Members of the chamber of Commerce have requested me, to obtain a List of the Vessels now on Voyages from this port, to Calcutta & China, with an estimate of their Value And to transmit them to you for the purpose of being laid before the President of the US.\nI have in conformity had such lists prepared And now transmit them praying that You may take an Early Opportunity, of Laying them before the President During the last Summer the Secy. of the Treasury had Communicated, to him, a List of the Vessels of the United States, then on Voyages, to ports beyond the Cape of Good Hope A Reference to those lists will shew the Magnitude, of the Object, and will I trust be a Sufficient apology for the expectation entertained, that it would engage the Attention of Government\nIt may not be unusefull to remark that altho the China Vessells do not appear to be Implicated, by the terms of the decrees, as published Yet Serious apprehensions are entertained that under the present Aspect of affairs, they would be detained under an expectation, that Subsequent events, would sanction their Capture Should they even be released after capture the plunder and detention Consequent would be Ruinous to the American owners.\nThe principle danger apprehended is from privateers, fitted out from french, & Spanish Colonys, The Numbers of or force of which are not at present considerable but will no doubt be Considerably augmented, in Consequence of these decrees.\nAnxious as the Merchants undoubtedly are for the fate of this Immense property, they do not presume to do more than to submit thier Case, to the Government Consoling themselves with the hope, that such Measures will be adopted, as the Nature of the Case, and the state of public affairs, will warrant\nShould any Cooperation on their part be deemed Necessary, they will most cheerfully, afford it\nAnd will be thankfull for any Information You will please to Communicate, on Account of this application I am With respect Sir Yr hble Servt.\nThos FitzSimonsPresidt. Philada. Chamber Commerce", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2714", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Jarvis, 18 February 1808\nFrom: Jarvis, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nLisbon 18th. Feby. 1808\nThe original of the preceding of the 29 Jany. went by the Brig Orlando Captn. Baty, and the duplicate with the originals of the 1st. & 5th. Feby, by the Brig Daniel Captn. Baill; Since then nothing material has taken place but that of the disarming of the Militia, of which the decree is inclosed. Some dissatisfaction has been excited by the contribution but it has not extended to any thing beyond that of private murmurs nor does there appear to be the least disposition on the part of the people to proceed farther, which is certainly prudent, as not the smallest benifit would arise, but much injury would inevitably result from resistance.\nOwing to the blockade of the port, the Brig Maria in which Miss Sparhawk & Mr. Jarvis came as passengers, was obliged to proceed to St. Lucar, near Cadiz which will render it necessary for me to leave here for that place, for a short time. As it is probable, that the President, as well as yourself Sir may know the circumstances & feelings which imperiously call on me to shew this respectful attention to that Young Lady; I am persuaded that both will approve a short departure from my post on such an occasion, at a time when the public have so little call for services in this place, there being only four vessels of the United States now in port, three of which will leave here before my departure and the other shortly after, to facilitate which I shall make every arrangement before I set away.\nA dispatch from Mr Erving received by a Gentleman just from Madrid will go by the Ship Sally & Hitty, Captn. Fleming for Philada. by which conveyance this letter goes; and another from that Gentleman will be forwarded by the Brig Fame, Captn. Howe for Providence. I shall also send by this conveyance all the decrees of Genl. Junot to this date. \nWith entire Respect I have the honor to be Sir Yr. Mo: Ob: Servt.\nWilliam Jarvis\nP.S. After the British orders of the 11 Novr. the declaration by Sir Sidney Smith of the Blockade of Porto became of so little consequence that I had almost forgot to inclose a copy. It was sent into St. Uber by a flag of truce, transmitted to General Junot & by His Excy. sent to me under cover. Another flag of truce came in two days ago, with the wounded prisoners out of a gun boat which the British cut off from an exposed situation, a few days before. The General refused to receive them, & positively forbid the entry of any others.\nIt is currently reported that the Spanish General at St. Uber has embargoed all the Grain in the Alentejo, (the principal grain province in Portugal) for the use of the Spanish Army. Probably this may be alluded to in the decree on this subject. It is certain that there exists no cordiality between the commanders.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2717", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Henry Hill, 19 February 1808\nFrom: Hill, Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nSir, \nNew York Feby. 19th. 1808.\nSince writing the accompanying communication I have seen the Prince Regents Declaration, but there is nothing therein contained which gives me reason to believe his sovereignty is not permanently transferred to the Brazils, or to alter in any respect my opinions but rather to confirm them; and to give me stronger reasons to believe that, if the President and yourself view the subject in a similar light with that which has guided me, the sooner overtures are made him from this country the better; as he will be immediately beset with the duplicity and intrigues of the Mercantile policy of Great Britain.\nA treaty with him or even an attempt to open the commerce of the Brazils to this Country by our govt., would in my opinion be a very popular measure and might have a happy effect upon the approaching presidential Election, since it will at once rebut the falshoods industriously propagated that the administration are inimical to commerce, when it can be carried on without implicating and endangering the more essential interests of the Country.\nFinding myself in a situation to wish for some foreign employ under the Govt., I should feel gratiful and highly honored again to have it in my power under other circumstances and with greater experience, to manifest a zeal I feel for the honor and interests of my Country, and to promote the views of the administration.\nYou will not infer from this, Sir, that I think myself qualified to negotiate a commercial treaty; but I think I might aid in such an object and I should be highly gratified with an appointment to Rio-Janiro as Consul, for which I beg you will be pleased to consider me an applicant.\nIf however it should be deemed by the President improper to send out a person at this time specifically to Negotiate a commercial treaty with the Prince Regent, or to reside in the Brazils as Minister near his court, & at the same time it should meet his intentions to send a person charged with congratulatory compliments, and instructions to sound the prince on a commercial arrangement, I should be happy to convey his wishes, and it should be done without any expence whatever to the Govt. unless the object totally failed and I should not be permitted to reside there in a public capacity; which is within the bounds of possibility, but by no means probable.\nI have considered my communication as requiring secrecy from myself, and have only made it known to Doctr. Mitchill under an injunction to that effect. I have the honor to be, Sir, Very Respectfully, Your Mo. ob. Servt.\nHenry Hill Jr.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2718", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Henry Dearborn, 19 February 1808\nFrom: Dearborn, Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nWar Department February 19th. 1808\nI have the honor of enclosing you herewith an official Copy of the Agreement, for the sale of the French Ordnance and other military stores left at New Orleans, made, with the approbation of General Turreau, between me and Mr. Beaujour, Commissary General of France, together with an official Copy of the Inventory alluded to, and of the receipts for the consideration money.\nIt may not be improper for me to remark, that a provisional agreement, of a subsequent date to the above, was made between General Wilkinson and Mr. Deforgues, French Consul at New Orleans, for the sale of the said Ordnance and Military Stores to the United States. As soon as information of this transaction was received, General Turreau was advised of it, and requested to give orders for refunding, to our Military Agent at that place, the sum of Thirty thousand dollars, which had been deposited in Bank to the credit of Mr. Deforgues, as a security for the said ordnance &c. until the agreement for its sale had received the determination of the two Governments. General Turreau gave assurances that the request should be complied with; but, owing probably to some accident, the order did not reach Mr. Deforgues. Notice of the failure having been received, Genl. Turreau was again applied to on the subject, who immediately furnished me with duplicate orders; one of which has been remmitted to our Agent, but the receipt not yet acknowledged.\nI would further remark that, of the articles mentioned in the Inventory, some are deficient, and others much damaged. I have the honor to be very respectfully, Sir, your Ob: Servt.\nH. Dearborn", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2719", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Fulwar Skipwith, 19 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Skipwith, Fulwar\nSir.\nDepartment of State, February 19. \u201908\nYour letters of January 17th., February 4. March 30, April 7. 13 & 24, September 25. Octr. 3, & 19th. 1807, have been duly received.\nIt would appear that the case of the Prisoners of War to which you allude in that of the 30th. of March comes under the general instructions which have already gone from this Department to the Consuls and Vice-Consuls of the United States, in my Circular letter of the 1st. August 1801; and that you are authorised to administer relief to the Individual Prisoners who solicit it (as distressed American Seamen) on their satisfying you that they are Citizens of the United States, and are not otherwise provided for. You will have to account with the Minister of the United States, at Paris, according to the Circular letter referred to, for your disbursements. Except in cases in which the Government is interested in the ultimate decisions, prize cause expreses are no longer to be defrayed by the United States.\nZedekiah Snow, the subject of the enclosed document, is stated to have been carried a Prisoner of War to France some time ago, as you will see from his Father\u2019s letter to this Department, a copy of which is likewise enclosed. His Citizenship being fully proved, and his person identified, the enclosures are now forwarded for the purpose of enabling you to claim his discharge agreeably to the request of his Father. I am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2721", "content": "Title: From James Madison to William Pinkney, 19 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Pinkney, William\nSir,\nDepartment of State, February 19th. 1808.\nA vessel having been engaged to carry from the Port of New York public dispatches and mercantile letters to Europe; I avail myself of the opportunity of forwarding you a series of Gazettes, which contain the proceedings of Congress, and such current information, as will give you a view of our internal affairs. They will be put, with this letter, into the hands of Mr Nourse, a passenger in the dispatch Vessel, who will deliver them at London; and as the vessel, which will have previously touched at L\u2019Orient, will after waiting 10 or 12 days at Falmouth, return to that port and thence to the United States, you will have an opportunity of sending thither any communications you may wish to make to Paris, as well as of transmitting to your Government such as may follow up your correspondence, which at the present period will be the more acceptable, the more it be frequent and full.\nMy last, which was committed to the British packet, inclosed a copy of the Act of Embargo, and explained the policy of the measure. Among the considerations which enforced it was the probability of such decrees as were issued by the British Government on the 11th. of Novr., the language of the British Gazettes, with other indications, having left little doubt that such were meditated. The appearance of these Decrees, has had much effect in reconciling all descriptions among us to the Embargo, and in fixing in the friends of the measure, their attachment to its provident guardianship of our maritime interests.\nMr Erskine communicated a few days ago, the several late decrees of his Government with expressions of the regret felt by His Britannic Majesty at the necessity imposed on him, for such an interference with neutral commerce, and assurances that His Majesty would readily follow the example, in case the Berlin decree should be rescinded, or would proceed pari passu with France in relaxing the rigor of their measures. Mr. Erskine was asked whether his Government distinguished between the operation of the French decree municipally on land, and its operation on the High seas. On this point he was unable to answer; as he also was, to an enquiry whether the late British decrees had reference to the late extension of the French decree, with respect to the United States. He seemed also, as is perhaps the case with his government, to have taken very little into consideration, the violations of neutral commerce, and through them, the vast injury to France, antecedent to the Berlin Decree. It is probable that something further is to pass between us on this subject. I have the honor to be With great respect and consideration, Sir, your Most Obt. Servt\nJames Madison\nThe following in Cypher not being prepared when the foregoing letter was signed is to be considered notwithstanding as a part of that letter.\nMr Rose has now been about a month in this City. He opened his mission with a demand of the repeal of the Presidents proclamation of July second, as an indispensable preliminary to a negotiation of the adjustment to which his mission related. The Time has hitherto been chiefly spent in informal experiments to overcome this difficulty at the threshold, which have led to a glimpse of other prerequisites to the success of the negotiation as little looked for as they are inadmissible on the part of the U. S. At present, it would seem that the informal communications are at an end; and that a formal note given in by Mr Rose some Time ago, stating his preliminary demand, is to receive a formal and written answer. The particular Turn which the correspondence may take in its close, I am not yet authorised to state to you.\nIt was my purpose to have given greater extent to this letter; But I have been till within a day or two for nearly two weeks confined by an indisposition which unfitted me for business of any sort. And even now I sacrifice the consideration of health, to my anxiety to avoid a longer detention of the dispatch Vessel which has been some time waiting for this and for the communications destined to Genl. Armstrong.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-20-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2722", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Crawford, 20 February 1808\nFrom: Crawford, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nThe preceding address is now transmitted thro\u2019 you to the president of the United States in consequence of the following resolution carried at a meeting held by the Democratic citizens of the county of Adams in Gettysburg upon Monday the 15th. Febry. instt.\nResolved unanimously that a committee of five be appointed to draft an address to the General government on the present critical situation of our public affairs; and that said committee act as a standing committee of correspondence to communicate with such other committees throughout this state or the United States as the public exigencies may require: And that Doctor Wm. Crawford, General id, Saml. Smyth Esqre. John Weichart Esqre. & Doctor l Sheffer be said committee. When said committee retired, after some time returned and reported an address to the President of the United States which was read & approved of unanimously by the general committee. Whereupon resolved that a copy of the aforesaid Address be transmitted to the general government & another to the editor of the Aurora for publication.\nThis address & resolution I therefore transmit to you with a request that you will present it according to the address and in so doing you will conferr a particular obligation on the democratic citizens of Adams County In behalf of the chairman at his request\nWm. Crawford", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-20-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2723", "content": "Title: From James Madison to William Lewis, 20 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Lewis, William\nSir,\nDepartment of State, 20th. February, 1808.\nYou will hasten to New York and embark at that place in the ship Osage. This vessel being employed in the service of the Government, is placed under your direction, and the Master will of course follow such instructions as you may give him, and as are consistent with the Charter party of which a Copy is inclosed. You will proceed with all practicable dispatch to the port of L\u2019Orient, and there cause the private letters destined for that place to be disposed of according to their address. You will then direct the Master of the Vessel to proceed to Falmouth in England where he will deliver the letters for that Country. You will instruct him to remain there until he receives the dispatches from Mr: Pinkney our Minister in London, when he is to return to L\u2019Orient. You will yourself go on without loss of time from L\u2019Orient to Paris and deliver to General Armstrong the several packages now handed to you for him. You will wait there for his dispatches to the Government, and as soon as you receive them, you will return to L\u2019Orient so as to meet the vessel there and come directly home in her. It may be well to enquire at L\u2019Orient whether there will be any difficulty in the admission of the vessel in a French port on her return from England, and if so, to obtain thro\u2019 General Armstrong an order for removing it. As a compensation in full for this service you will be allowed six dollars a day, together with your travelling expences to and from Paris and the cost of your sea stores. I have the Honor to be, Very respectfully Sir, Your Mo. Obt: Servt:\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-20-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2725", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Duane, 20 February 1808\nFrom: Duane, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nPhila. Feb. 20, 1808\nThe enclosed information I conceive to be better disposed of in the Department of State than in a newspaper, and therefore transmit it.\nI respectfully suggest that as the communicator did not perhaps expect to be thus before the Executive Department that in relation to him, to protect him from vengeance of Speculators, the letter be used only as in confidence. I have the honor to be Your Obedt. Sert.\nWm Duane", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-20-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2726", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Josef Yznardy, 20 February 1808\nFrom: Yznardy, Josef\nTo: Madison, James\nRespected Sir,\nCadiz 20th. February 1808.\nOn the other side please find Duplicate of what I had the honor to address you on the 13th. instant pr the Ship Manchester Capt. Reynolds, bound to Philadelphia; since when I have received from the Capn. General of this Department an official Letter, of which and of my answer thereto, I have the pleasure to enclose you Copies; not doubting in the least that the contents of my answer will merit your approbation.\nIt is positively reported that on the 29th. ultimo, a french Division from Rochefort a Ship and two frigates entered the Straights, that on the 10th. instant the Carthagena fleet Ships and a Frigate had Sailed; and on the 9. an English division Seven Ships and Frigates went in Search of them.\nThe Tribunal of Algeziras has taken no determination with respect to the Vessels detained there. With Sentiments of high Consideration, I am with profound Respect Sir, Your most obedt. Servant\nJosef Yznardy\nPlease find enclosed Mr. Moreno\u2019s Answer.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-20-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2727", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Valentin de Foronda, 20 February 1808\nFrom: Foronda, Valentin de\nTo: Madison, James\nMuy Se\u0148or mio:\nPhiladelphia 20. de Febrero de 1808\nLeyendo anoche la gazeta de Relfs, se detubo mi atencion en \u00e8ste periodo de un bill presentado por el Se\u0148or Campbell: \"Between the District of Mobille and any of the other Ports of the United States, although loaded at the town Mobille, or its vicinity, on its passage\".\nAunque doy \u00e0 estos frases su verdadero sentido; como podria entenderse que Mobilla se contaba entre los Puertos de los Estados Unidos, pues el que quisiera decir lo baxo de semejante frase podria expresarse del mismo modo; espero que S. E. el Sr. Presidente tendr\u00e1 la bondad de convenir en que el periodo no tiene el sentido de comprender la Mobila entre los Puertos de la jurisdiccion de los Estados Unidos. Dios gue. \u00e0 V. S. Ms. As. B. L. M. de VS su mas atento servidor\nValentin de Foronda", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-20-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2728", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Armstrong, Jr., 20 February 1808\nFrom: Armstrong, John, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nParis 20th feby 1808\nThe\n61. 45. symbols \n2 lines of symbols\n1 line of symbols\nsymbol 45. 147. 1158. symbols \nsymbols 13. 230. 481. symbols \n1 line of symbols\nI have the honor to be, sir, with very high consideration, your most obedient & very humble servant\nJohn Armstrong", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-21-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2729", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Henry Rose, 21 February 1808\nFrom: Rose, George Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nSunday February 21st. 1808\nIf it should be convenient to Mr. Madison, Mr. Rose will do himself the honor of waiting upon him to-morrow, at any hour, that may best suit him.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-21-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2731", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Henry Rose, 21 February 1808\nFrom: Rose, George Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nSunday Feby. 21st. 1808\nMr. Rose will not fail to do himself the honor of waiting upon Mr. Madison at his own house at 2 o\u2019clock to-morrow; but he learns with much regret, that he is still confined to it.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-22-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2733", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Armstrong, Jr., 22 February 1808\nFrom: Armstrong, John, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nParis 22 february 1808\nMr Patterson offers so good a conveyance that I cannot but employ it. Nothing has occurred here since the date of my public dispatches (the 17th. inst.) to give to our business an aspect more favorable than it then had, but on the other hand, I have come at the knowledge of two facts which, I think, sufficiently shew the decided character of the Emperor\u2019s policy with regard to us. These are\n1st that in a council of administration held a few days past, when it was proposed to modify the operation of the decrees of November 1806 and December 1807 (though the proposition was supported by the whole weight of the Council) he became highly indignant and declared, that these decrees should suffer no Change, and that the Americans Should be compelled to take the positive character, either of allies or of enemies: 2d that on the 27th. of January last, twelve days after Mr. Champagny\u2019s written assurances that these decrees Should work no change in the property Sequestered untill our discussions with England were brought to a close, and Seven days before he repeated to me verbally these very assurances, the Emperor had, by a Special Decision, Confiscated two of our Ships and their cargoes (the Julius Henry & Juniatta) for want merely of a document not required by any law or usage of the Commerce in which they had been engaged. ( here to the See Mr. Champagny\u2019s letter .) This act was taken, as I am informed on a general report of Sequestred cases amounting to one hundred and Sixty, and which at present prices, will yield upwards of one hundred Millions of francs a Sum whose magnitude alone renders hopeless all attempts at saving it. Danes, Portuguese, & Americans will be the principal Sufferers.\nIf I am right in supposing that the Emperor has definitively taken his ground, I cannot be wrong in concluding that you will immediately take your\u2019s. In doing this a Short Sketch of what is going on in Europe of a public nature may not be useless.\n972. 1394. 1090 1354 946 985 608 899 1482 1228 1492 297. 1001. Russia is to seize Finland, while France & Denmark take possession of Sweden 26 736 1587 916 369 630. 1478. 860. 1090. 758. 1282. 1284. 825. And it is certainly amongst the most cruel circumstances of the British attack on her Capital that 1484 1436 1078 368 1463 337 1354 1463 1358 1217 631 463 1354 470 1257 1217 593 383 821 1463 1247 1181 967 860 1479 972 1224 1116 1354 1069 962 396 972. 752. 1483 61 385. 590. 1572. 1373. 380 1478. 537. 1467 1247 631 578. 1116 1165 509 943 590. 988 1304. 1217 985 351. 1431 972. 769 803. 1354 1467 193 514 1217. 972 511 1116 579 821 1429. 1484 1165. 1201 1157 1082 972 1090 578. 882. 1257 1480. 1479 26 1354 1201 191 690. 962. 1354 968 1494. 1244 1387 of Hamburg waited in the antichamber, with the intelligence that the Prince of Ponte Corvo had already entered Holstein with a force which rendered the assent of that Government quite Superfluous. Charles the Vth. used to say, that with such a connexion with England as should secure her friendship, and the possession of the Sound and the Dardanells he could at any time make himself master of Europe. Napoleon is on the point of Shewing that with these two famous passes he can govern Europe, not only without the friendship, but against the inclination & efforts of England. There is no one of even tolerable Knowledge and sagacity, who does not see this. Yet wonderful to tell 305 1587 947 765. 1587. 87. 1478. 804 1158. 860. 1225. 1132. 1116 927. 1090 803. 1247 655. 1126 1478. 550 917 1354. 972 236. Can Finland compensate for a State of things, which Shall put it in the power of France to lock up the Baltic it\u2019s produce and industry, whenever it shall please her to do so? Can a few additional Square miles of ice & Snow be put in competition with commercial prosperity and independance? Or have their Imperial Majesties agreed to divide the Sound & the Hellespont between them? If this be the magic by which Napoleon has not only quieted the alarms of Alexander on the Score of Poland and Silenced his complaints with regard to Prussia, but actually embarked him in a war for the professed destruction of a neibor and a kinsman, it can only be regarded as a new proof of the ascendant of the former, and that he is Still more superior to his Imperial brother in the Cabinet than in the field.\nOf Prussia, of the British confederacy, of Austria & Switzerland, I need Say nothing: they are in a State of the 523. 1247 1182 967. 933 1088. 1078. 431.\nIn the South, the career of revolution is going on. The pope has been required to crown Joseph; to Shut out British Commerce &c. &c or to yield up the tiara to Some one, who Shall have fewer Scruples, or more complaisance. The proposition was met with a resolution not common to his years and by no means expected from the character of His holiness. He peremptorily refused to accept either Side of the alternative, and retiring to a Convent, declared, that as the present State of the church required a martyr he was ready to devote himself to that service. Something was expected from the firmness, and Something from the piety of this declaration, but the hopes of the faithful rested principally on the fasting humiliation and prayer of the Sacred college, by which it was followed. Alas in our profane day Spiritual means work no miracles, nor even any perceptible effect, and it is a melancholy fact, that on the present occasion the march of & the french Legions was not retarded a single moment. They took quiet possession of Rome, & its dependencies on the 2d. instant.\nThe day preceding this event Gen. Junot proclaimed a provisional Government for Portugal, by which it appears that 773. 1337. 255. 772. 630. 1587 1018 1002 821. 1165. 623. 705. 972. 461. 1354. 971. 1098. 1024 962 1090. 326.\nYou will excuse this excursion beyond my own borders and believe me to be with the highest consideration, Your most obedient & very humble Servant\nJohn Armstrong\nP. S Another attempt on the two offensive decrees will I am assured be made on wednesday next. It will be 3. 1001. 1429. 1251 965. 307. 1268. 1420. 1538. 608. 744 794 1217 855 659. 1288. 1429 965 860. 862. 1001 962. The news of the Embargo came in good time. By verifying one of my predictions, it gave new weight to others The ministerial belief now is that the present policy is dangerous but till this conviction Shall be wrought in the Emperor also no change will take place for the better", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-22-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2734", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 22 February 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\nPrivate\nDear Sir,\nLondon, Feby. 22. 1808.\nI have the Honor to enclose a Copy of Mr. Percival\u2019s Bill for carrying the late Orders of Council into Effect. It is intended, as I am told to alter it in some Respects. The Clause which imposes an Export Duty on the Cargoes of neutral Vessels, changing their Destination, after touching here, is to be omitted. The Cotton of the British Colonies is to be placed in the same Predicament, whatever that may be, with American Cotton; and instead of a prohibitory Duty upon the Export of that Article, it is, I believe, determined (in Consequence of the pressing Advice of those who affect to understand the Subject, aided by the late Discussions in Parliament) to prohibit directly the Exportation of Cotton; with a Proviso however in Favour of a licensing Power in the King in Council (of which I do not yet know the intended Use) and probably with an option to the Neutral owner, to export the Commodity, upon payment of the Duty heretofore in Contemplation. This Change in their plan has indeed been recently mentioned to me by Mr. Canning, with a View to obtain my Concurrence in it; but I have declined (as I had before done upon a similar proposal, as already explained to you) to make myself in any Degree a party to it. The Change will be attributed to, and is declared to proceed from, a Respect for our Feelings; but unfortunately the other Parts of their System make this supposed Respect of no Value. One of its objects, however, is doubtless to conciliate us.\nYou will find in the Resolutions (of which I have already sent you two Copies, and which, after undergoing some Corrections, are to form the Tables A B. & C. of the Bill) an Export Duty of 2/ 6 Stg. pr. Bushel on foreign Salt. The Effect of this Duty must be, and is intended to be, that the U. S. can no longer obtain their usual Supply of that Article (I think about 800,000 Bushels) from Spain and Portugal. Mr. Percival, calculating upon this Effect, supposes that we must of Course come here for British Salt, not only to the Amount of the Quantity heretofore taken by us (I believe about 1300,000 Bushels) but to the farther Amount of the Supply heretofore obtained by us from Spain & Portugal, & perhaps more. Having thus, as he supposes, (without by the bye reflecting upon the Difficulty of preventing us from procuring what Salt we think fit from the Bahamas, & upon the Danger of our making it for ourselves) created an absolute Necessity for our taking between 2 & 3 Millions of Bushels, at least of British Salt, his Plan is to take Advantage of that Necessity, & to lay an Export Duty upon it of 3d. Sterling per Bushel!! I have some Doubts of his being able to succeed in Parliament in this strange Attempt; but he seems bent upon trying it.\nAs to the Commodities of France, Spain, Holland &c, imported into this Country for Exportation, they are charged with heavy Duties, upon re-exportation to the U. S., which we, as the Consumers, are of Course to pay. But if the same Commodities are re exported to a British Colony in America &c, most of them are exempted from the Duties by a proviso in the Bill. Thus a Tribute is to be imposed upon us, which they do not choose to impose upon their own Colonies, some of them in our immediate Neighbourhood, & authorized to trade with us, by Land or Inland Navigation, in these Commodities so long as we do not entirely prohibit their Importation. They will annoy their Enemy at our Expence, but not at their own!\nIt was to be expected that all the Articles forming the Surplus of our Colonial Importations would be (as they are) subjected to heavy Duties on passing through B. Ports to the Continent. But it has an odd Appearance, in a Measure proposed to be purely belligerent, & to be intended simply to \"Annoy the Enemy\", that the like Articles, of which France is supposed to stand so much in Need, and of which the Privation or enhanced price wd. so severely distress her, are exempted altogether from those Duties, if they come from British Colonies.\nYou will find that a long Section of the Bill touches our Trade to the Continent of Europe in E. Indian Articles. They must not only come to England on their Way, but they must come to the Port of London &c, & afterwards pay Export Duties, from which the Company\u2019s Trade is free.\nAs to the Duties which the Resolutions proposed (as I mentioned in my last) upon Tobacco &c; they seem to be explained by one of the Provisions, to which I refer you.\nThese laboured Details are, after all, little more than Shadows; unless indeed France should lend herself to this extravagant System, and the U. S. should follow her Example. As this must be impossible, it follows that this gigantic Plan of Monopoly & Tribute will sink into a smuggling scheme, by which the Nation will be impoverished corrupted and dishonoured.\nMr. Baring\u2019s Book is in great Credit here. It is read with Avidity & is doing Good. Parts of it are highly meritorious. It was wished to bring it out sooner; but it was found to be impracticable. The author of \"War in Disguise\" (whom it is intended to bring into Parliament) is preparing an Answer to it.\nThe Opposition to the Orders in Council is Powerful; and some have Hopes that Ministers will be compelled to abandon them. It is certain that they were not cordially approved by all the Cabinet; but Mr. Percival & some of his Colleagues are I believe determined to go on, with their Experiment at all Hazards. L. Hawksbury is now supposed not to have had much, if any Share, in them.\nI enclose Copies of two Notes to me from the Swedish Minister at this Court, and of a Note from Mr to Mr. Monroe, to which they relate. The object seems to be inadmissible; but it may perhaps be well to authorize some civil Answer without Delay. I have the Honor to be with sincere Attachment Dear Sir, Your most obedt. Hble Servant\nWm Pinkney\nP. S. Feby. 25th. Mr. Percival has abandoned his proposed Duty upon Salt. You will perceive by the parliamentary Debates that an Arrangement is contemplated with Sweden for subjecting Exports from that Country to Transit Duties equivalent to those which will be imposed here. I now enclose a Copy of Mr. Percivals Bill amended. I need not point out to you in what Respects it differs from the first Bill. I enclose also Copies of the Papers just laid before Parliament relative to America. They are misapprehended by the Public; but will be explained in Parliament. You will not fail to observe that in Mr. Percival\u2019s amended Bill Cotton, Wool & Yarn, & Bark are excepted from the Benefit of the Clause in the 3d. paper (Clause B.) relative to Vessels coming in under Warning. I add to the Enclosures a Printed official account of the principal Articles of provisions & Lumber imported into the B. West Indies &c.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2735", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Charles Coles Claiborne, 23 February 1808\nFrom: Claiborne, William Charles Coles\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nNew-Orleans, Feby. 23rd. 1808.\nBeing requested by Governor Folch to forward the inclosed packet, I have taken the liberty to send it under Cover to the Department of State, & must beg the favor of you, to cause it to be placed in the Mail at Washington.\nOn the 17th. Instant, I transmitted to you Copies of the Letters which have passed between Governor Folch and myself on the subject of the Embargo. I am Sir, with great respect, your mo: obt. Servt.\nWilliam C. C. Claiborne", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2736", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Gavino, 23 February 1808\nFrom: Gavino, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nFebruary 23d: 1808\nI beg leave to Confirm the preceeding Copy of my last Respects No: 54, since when have not been honourd with any of yours.\nA few Days ago a french Squadron of five Sail the Line who got out of Rochford enterd the Mediterrenean, since when an English one under Sir Richd. Strawhan, past this in pursute of them with Seven Sail the Line. I have the honr to be with respect Sir Your most obedt & most hl: sert\nJohn Gavino", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2737", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 23 February 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nLondon February 23d: 1808.\nMr. Canning had just sent me a note, of which a copy is enclosed, relative to an intended alteration, upon the subject of cotton, in their bill for carrying into execution the late Orders in Council. You will perceive that he lays some stress upon the accidental observations, which (as already explained to you in my letter of the 26th: of last month) were drawn from me, some time since, upon the singularly offensive project of imposing a transit duty upon our cotton. I mentioned to you, in my letter of the 2d: instant, that he appeared to have misapprehended the tendency of those observations, and that in a subsequent conversation he shewed a disposition to remove this obnoxious feature from their plan, for the purpose of substituting an absolute interdict of the export of that article, under an idea that we should then cease to object to it; but that I thought it my duty to decline to give him any encouragement to do so; although I agreed, as he seemed to wish it; to mention his disposition to you. A few days ago he sent for me again, and renewed his proposal of an immediate change with respect to cotton, from a prohibitory duty to direct prohibition. My answer was the same in substance as it had been before. He then suggested the alternative arrangement which you will see stated in his note; but, adhering to the determination I had formed, upon the first appearance of the Orders in Council, to make no compromise (without precise directions from my government) with the system which they announce, by becoming a party to it\u2019s details, I received this proposal as I had done the other.\nThe British government, however, had resolved to adopt this last mentioned plan, whether it received my concurrence or not, upon a presumption that it would be more acceptable to us, and perhaps too under the idea that it was more defensible than their original scheme; and the purpose of Mr. Canning\u2019s note is merely to signify to me, in a manner as friendly and respectful as possible to the United States, their intention to propose it to Parliament. One object of all this is certainly to conciliate us; altho\u2019 it may be another to free their system, as far as they can, from the disadvantage of one of the formidable reproaches which their opponents cast upon it. But the wise and magnanimous course would be at once to tread back their steps upon the whole of this illjudged measure, instead of relying upon small and unsubstantial modifications, which neither produce an effect upon it\u2019s character and principle, nor mitigate the severity of it\u2019s practical consequences. I might, if I thought it adviseable, take the occasion, which Mr. Canning\u2019s note undoubtedly furnishes, to press upon him once more the policy as well as the justice of such a course; but I believe it, under all circumstances, to be more prudent to wait for your instructions, which must I think be very soon received.\nI have already had the honor to send you two copies of the resolutions, moved in the House of Commons by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, as tables of export duties, to which their bill should refer. I have enclosed in another letter, with which this will be accompanied, a copy of the bill itself, which will, however, undergo several alterations. These will be found to be explained (as far as I am acquainted with them) in the letter above mentioned. I have the Honor to be, with perfect esteem and consideration, Sir, Your Most Obedient Humble Servant\nWm: Pinkney", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2739", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Louis-Marie Turreau de Garambouville, 23 February 1808\nFrom: Turreau de Garambouville, Louis-Marie\nTo: Madison, James\nMonsieur,\nA Washington le 23. f\u00e9vrier an 1808\nJ\u2019ai l\u2019honneur de vous adresser ci-joint plusieurs Notes de M. G\u00e9rard, l\u2019un de mes pr\u00e9d\u00e9cesseurs, et un extrait d\u2019une d\u00e9p\u00eache de M. Le Comte de Vergennes \u00e0 ce Ministre, contenant des d\u00e9clarations officielles faites au Congr\u00e8s & \u00e0 vos Commissaires a Paris: que le Roi n\u2019a rien fourni aux Etats: Unis en munitions militaires et que tous les articles exp\u00e9di\u00e9s par M. de Beaumarchais l\u2019ont \u00e9t\u00e9 pour Son compte particulier. Ces pi\u00e8ces d\u00e9truisent cons\u00e9quemment toutes assertions contraires auxquelles, peut: \u00eatre, les animosites Survenues entre vos Commissaires ont donn\u00e9 lieu dans le tems, et qu\u2019on voudrait faire renaitre aujourd\u2019hui, quoique les Actes du Congr\u00e8s en 1779 les aient d\u00e9clar\u00e9es fausses & erron\u00e9es.\nJ\u2019ai fait faire, Monsieur, dans les Archives de la Legation de France les recherches les plus exactes et les plus Scrupuleuses au Sujet de la r\u00e9clamation de M. de Beaumarchais contre les Etats Unis. Il n\u2019y existe pas une ligne, pas un mot, qui puisse att\u00e9nuer d\u2019une mani\u00e8re quelconque les d\u00e9clarations que j\u2019ai eu l\u2019honneur de vous faire d\u00e9j\u00e0 par ordre de mon Gouvernement et que je vous renouvelle aujourdhui:\n1o. Que le million re\u00e7u par M. de Beaumarchais le 10. n\u2019a ete pour un Service particulier & Secret par ordre particuli\u00e8rement la connaissance;\n2o. Que M. le Comte de Vergennes a rendu compte au Roi dans la m\u00eame ann\u00e9e 1776 que le d. Million avait re\u00e7u l\u2019emploi en la qu\u2019il avait que Sa Majest\u00e9 a approuv\u00e9 le d. rapport en ecrivant de Sa main en marge: Bon: Louis, et que M. de Beaumarchais a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9charg\u00e9 par cet Acte de tout r\u00e9p\u00e9t que le Gouvernement fran\u00e7ais avait Seul le droit de lui f le d. million;\n3o. Que M. le Comte de Vergennes, en refusant en 1786. de dire quel avait \u00e9t\u00e9 l\u2019emploi et la destination du d. Million, ainsi que le nom de celui qui l\u2019avait re\u00e7u, a confirm\u00e9 le Secret qu\u2019il voulait garder Sur le million en declarant qu\u2019il \u00e9tait inconvenant de le dire \u00e0 cette \u00e9poque o\u00f9 il n\u2019etait plus n\u00e9cessaire de garder aucun apr\u00e8s la convention de 1783;\n4o. Que le Gouvernement Fran\u00e7ais est reste constamment \u00e9tranger \u00e0 toutes les transactions mercantiles de M. de Beaumarchais avec les Etats-Unis. La preuve en existe dans les preuves contenant des d\u00e9clarations officielles \u00e0 ce Sujet faites \u00e0 vos Commissaires en France et au Congr\u00e8s et dans les actes m\u00eames du Congr\u00e8s en 1779.\nD\u2019apr\u00e8s les d\u00e9clarations formelles ci-dessus du Gouvernement de France, et d\u2019apr\u00e8s les Actes du Congr\u00e8s que j\u2019invoque, j\u2019esp\u00e8re avec la plus grande confiance Que justice Sera enfin rendue \u00e0 une famille dont le Chef a consacr\u00e9 Sa fortune & celle de ses amis et employ\u00e9 tout son influence pour le Succ\u00e8s de votre ind\u00e9pendance. Agr\u00e9ez, Monsieur, un nouvel hommage de ma haute Consid\u00e9ration.\nTurreau", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2741", "content": "Title: From James Madison to William Patterson, 24 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Patterson, William\nDear Sir\nWashington Feby. 24. 1808\nMr. Isaac Briggs being desirous of having an agency in carrying into effect the manufacturing plan instituted at Baltimore, I cannot refuse his wish that I would make him known to you. Mr. Briggs has a just & high reputation as a man of science, and with a general turn for mechanical subjects, has paid I understand some particular attention to the ingenious machinery used in the Cotton Manufactories. I can add with great truth that he possesses all the qualification which depends on soundness of judgment, sedateness of temper, the purest integrity, and a habitual assiduity in executing what he undertakes. Having this view of his character, I trust you will pardon the liberty I take in recommending him to your consideration, whatever may be the result of a comparison of his merits with those of others who may offer themselves for the same functions. With great esteem & respect I remain Dr. Sir Yr. mo: obedt. Servt\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2743", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Andrew Parks, 25 February 1808\nFrom: Parks, Andrew\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nBaltimore 25th: February 1808\nI have herewith inclosed you an acct. of the duties, Insurance, freight, and other expences attending your two Pipes of Wine.\nLet me request the favor of you to qualify to the Entry I sent you, before the Collector at Geo: Town, or Alexa., and return it me as soon as your convenience will permit, it being necessary very shortly, I should produce it to the collector here, to cancel my Agents Bond. With respectful compliments to Mrs. Madison, I am Dr. Sir Yr. very Obt. Hbl. Servt.\nAndw. Parks", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2744", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Lee, 25 February 1808\nFrom: Lee, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nBordeaux February 25th 1808\nSince my respects of the 13th nothing has transpired respecting the intentions of this Government, as relates to the numerous Vessels I then stated to you were detained in the ports of this Kingdom. Some of the Consignees of the Vessels under seizure in this port, are led to hope by advices from their friends at Paris, a favorable issue to their reclamations but, from General Armstrong\u2019s silence on this head I am led to believe the Emperor, has as yet come to no determination. The General announced to me some days ago dispatches for you but the Gentleman who was to have brought them, has arrived and informs me the General could not close them as he had not recd. a communication from the Government which he had been hourly expecting for some days. The best informed men both at Paris and in this place feel now persuaded that the United States will escape engaging in the contest on either side. They draw their conclusions from the belief that the Embargo will be kept on and that we shall be content to live without commerce until the conflict is ended.\nThe French it is said have taken possession of the strong fortress of Pampeluna in Upper Navarre about fifty miles from Bayonne. Prince Murat left this City at noon All the Imperial Guards & other troops to the amount of about five thousand followed after him. The Emperors mamelukes arrived yesterday and he is expected after tomorrow. It is understood that seventy thousand troops are still to pass thru this place in the course of ten or fifteen days. They with what have already passed will make at least two hundred thousand men. The Monks of Spain are hiding their treasure and flying in every direction. With great respect your Obedient Servant\nWm. Lee", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2745", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Thomas Jefferson, 25 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Jefferson, Thomas\nDear Sir\nI think the grounds of a message communicating Pinkney\u2019s & Armstrong\u2019s letters, should be those of aiding Congs. in appreciating our foreign relations, and in judging of the influence these ought to have on their measures of precaution. The Private letter of P. would perhaps have some good effects; but besides the objection to taking such a liberty with it, the communication might be ascribed to an undue anxiety to make certain impressions, and in that view have counter effects more than equivalent. Yrs. most respectfully\nJames Madison\nArmstrong\u2019s letter is in the hands of General Dearborn.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2746", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Jarvis, 25 February 1808\nFrom: Jarvis, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nLisbon the 25th. february 1808\nTo day the general in charge granted the passports for the four American Vessels three of which, will sail tomorrow & the other about days hence. Since my last of the 14th. February, there has nothing worthy of notice transferred. With perfect Respect I have the honour to be Sir, Yr most obedient Servt\nWm Jarvis", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-26-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2747", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Albert Gallatin, 26 February 1808\nFrom: Gallatin, Albert\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nTreasury Department 26th. Feby. 1808\nI have read Mr de Foronda\u2019s letter of the 20th. inst., and the bill of Congress to which it refers.\nSo far from the title, or body of the bill containing any expressions liable to misconstruction, the whole is predicated on the actual state of things without any reference to any claims which the United States may have on territories not in their actual possession. The town of Mobile as well as all that part of the bay & river of the same name which lies south of the 31st. degree of latitude is therefore considered, as it has heretofore been, as being a Spanish & foreign port. The inhabitants of the american district of Mobile, which includes all the waters of that name, north of the 31st. degree of latitude, & the custom house of which is Fort Stoddart, have complained that they were obliged to pay duties on goods imported from New Orleans or from other ports of the United States. For as they would not receive those goods, except by passing through that part of the river which is in the possession of Spain and even sometimes landing at the town of Mobile, the collector of Fort Stoddart has considered those goods as if imported from a Spanish port & demanded the usual duties. And in the same manner the cotton & other products of the American Settlements on Mobile, being necessarily carried through the Spanish part of the river, in their way to New Orleans, are, on their arrival at the last place, considered as if imported from a Spanish port and liable to the payment of duties. It is evident that the complaint of the inhabitants arises from the principle uniformly adopted by this Government, to consider all the territories in the possession of Spain as belonging to Spain, notwithstanding any claims on the part of the United States to such territory.\nThe bill intended to remedy the just complaint of our citizens, and a copy of which is enclosed, is predicated on the same principle, and simply enacts that no duties shall be collected on the goods transported in the manner above described, although they shall have passed through the territories in possession of Spain & been landed on their passage at the town of Mobile or its vicinity.\nAlthough I cannot understand how any doubt could have arisen on this Subject, or why any explanation is necessary in relation to a bill altogether of a domestic nature, and in which Spain has no greater concern than in a law which would exempt from duty goods imported into the United States from Havannah or any other Spanish port; yet I have been induced to communicate this explicit detail because similar, &, permit me to add, equally unfounded misapprehensions & misconstructions of a former law having been entertained by Mr. de Foronda\u2019s predecessor, I wish that a similar result may be prevented & that nothing in our revenue laws may receive an erroneous construction, calculated to renew unjust suspicions of the intentions of the Government of the United States. I have the honor to be With the highest respect Sir Your obedient Servt.\nAlbert Gallatin", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-26-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2750", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Anonymous, 26 February 1808\nFrom: Anonymous\nTo: Madison, James\nNo. 3\nDr. Sir,\nNew-York 26th. Feb. 1808.\nIn No. 1 I informed you that the republican party in this City & State were ready to denounce De Witt Clinton if they discovered any further dereliction of principal, & that they would have coupled him with Cheetham if they had not thought it policy to seperate them for the moment.\nCheetham is confined to the limits & in all probability will be for a long time to come. De Witt is obliged to give him a concealed support, being unwilling the party should know it. He has also been obliged to acquiesce in the removal of federalists which he had promised to have retained in office in the City & State, with the view to further his own or Uncles Election. The enclosed paper signed Amicus I trust speaks the sentiments of the great bulk of the republican party in this State. The smiling villain alluded to is Dewitt Clinton. Rest assured that he is well known by this time, and believed to be more abandoned than even Burr the traitor, or the Sacraficed Lewis. Lewis is an honourable man compared to any of the Clintons. His only crime was not submitting to be entirely controuled by DeWitt & Spencer, and subsequently joining his council in the appointment of two federalists to Office.\nThe appointment of Dr. Bullis is less objectionable than I at first thought for, the conduct of Beekman had been so obnoxtios to the People in and about the Ship Yards, that any change was agreeable.\nI wish that I was acquainted with Dr. Bullis & we could be of mutual advantage Yours in great haste\nH.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-26-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2751", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Francis Breuil, 26 February 1808\nFrom: Breuil, Francis\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nPhilada. 26th. february 1808\nHaving not received yet an answer to the letter I had the honour of addressing you a few weeks ago, I now take the liberty of enclosing my application for permission of letting out a flag of truce to carry passengers to France. Knowing that you have been indisposed and that your illness may be the cause of your Silence, I feel much reluctance to trouble you upon this Subject, but I am Sure that you will not take it amiss considering that a number of distressed French Families who had prevailed upon me to make application to you in their behalf, call daily upon me to have an answer. You will therefore do me a particular favor by informing me Whether thes unfortunate people can have hopes of obtaining the object of their wishes. I once more beg you will excuse the trouble I give you. I am very respectfully, Sir, your most obt humble Servant\nFs. Breuil", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2752", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Juan Francisco de Lasa, 27 February 1808\nFrom: de Lasa, Juan Francisco\nTo: Madison, James\nPhiladelphia Feby. 27th. 1808\nThe Petition of the subscribers subjects of his Catholic Majesty, now tranciently residing within the United States\nMost respectfully Sheweth\nThat your Petitioners as well as several others of their Countrymen whose names do not appear here subscribed on account of their temporary absence from this City, have come to the United States either as agents for Commercial Houses residing in the Spanish Dominions, or in the pursuit of their own Commercial concerns, in order to effect the recovery of monies due to them or the like, but in all cases on business which required only a temporary stay in this Country, & not with a view of establishing here their permanent residence. That having completed the transaction of the business which had brought them hither they were preparing to return home, when the embargo lately laid by the legislature of the United States put a sudden stop to their departure. That on the 10th. of the present month they applied by Petition to the Consul General of Spain that he might apply in their behalf to the Government of the United States, and obtain for them if possible the means of effecting their return to the Spanish Dominions, but the said Consul has informed them that the said Government pressed by more important Concerns, had not yet returned an answer to his application.\nAnxious as your Petitioners are to return to their respective homes, families and affairs and fearful as they are of being detained here at a considerable expence but which yet will be trifling when compared with the loss which their absence from home will occasion to them, they have taken the resolution humbly and respectfully to lay their case before you, hoping that the American Government will be pleased to consider it in their Wisdom, & to grant them relief in the premises.\nThey therefore humbly pray that they may be permitted to hire a Vessel, & that the same may be cleared out from the Custom house of this City, New York, or Baltimore to Sail on ballast for some Port or Ports of the dominions of Spain, with your Petitioners on board & Such others of their Countrymen as may be in a similar situation with them, & desirous of returning home, the whole under such restrictions as the Laws or interest of the United States may require, & to which they will most chearfully submit.\nAnd Your Petitioners Shall ever pray.\nJuan Franco. de Lasaof the house of Yriarte & Lasa of Havana.\nJose Anto. de Yarzaof the house of Ramirez y Yarza of HavanaJuan Ba. Savelleof the house of Jos\u00e9 Mayez Tarafa of Havana.\nPhiladelphia Feby. 27th. 1808.We the Subscribers Citizens of the United States residing in Philadelphia, Certify that we are well acquinted with the above Petitioners, that they are such as they Style themselves, & we do respectfully recommend their Case to the Consideration of Government.\nJared Ingersoll\nJohn Leamy Jr.\nStephen Girard\nL Clymer\nPeter S. Du Ponceau", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2753", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Timothy Wiggin, 27 February 1808\nFrom: Wiggin, Timothy\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nManchester Feby. 27, 1808\nI have heard from undoubted authority that Some British Merchants trading to Canada, have Shiped, & are preparing to ship, large quantities of Such goods as are prohibited by the American nonimportation act, with the avowed intention of passing them from that quarter, into the United States. How far this plan may be practicable, and whether any additional precautionary measures may be necessary on the American frontier, are matters best known to you. As an American Merchant & friend to my Government & Country, I act from a Sense of duty in making this communication, and am with very Great respect, Your Mo Obt Hble Servt.\nTimothy Wiggin", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2754", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Davy, 27 February 1808\nFrom: Davy, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir!\nPhiladelphia Feby. 27. 1808\nPresuming that the Government, may soon have Occasion to ingage another Merchant Ship, to take Despatches to Europe, I am induced to take the Liberty of offering One for that purpose, of a very superior Quality: The Ship Coromandel of about 340 Tons burden, built in this Port, of the very best Materials, is Compleatly Copper\u2019d & copper bolted, has made one Voyage only to India; she has every thing ready to sail at a short Notice. If required she can carry Eighteen Guns, being expressly constructed for that purpose, & for very fast sailing, in which few Ships can equal her. The Gentlemen of the Navy of the U:S: stationed in this place, will if applied to give satisfactory Information of this Ship, Curiosity having led them to examine her Model, & general Construction with minute Attention.\nNot knowing on what Plan the Government employs these Vessels, I can only say, that I shall be satisfied with what may be reasonable for such a Ship as I have the honour to offer, & that she shall be most respectably commanded. I have the honour to be with great Respect Sir! your Obt. Hble Servt.\nWilliam Davy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2755", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Jarvis, 28 February 1808\nFrom: Jarvis, William\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nLisbon 28 Feby. 1808\nI was honored with your letters of the 30th. Octr. & 3rd. Novr. by the same post, they having come by the way of Cadiz, the vessel by which they were transmitted being turned away by the Blockading Squadron. It gave me much pleasure to hear that we had so good a harvest. Should contrary to the opinion I have formed from the British Orders of October & November, from the Speculative pieces I have seen in the Ministerial papers & from the information I have obtained through every other channel, Mr. Rose be charged with such powers as to bring about an amicable adjustment of the differences between the two Countries, a large quantity of our grain & flour must find an excellent market in Portugal, at least during the War, as no other Country can come in competition with ours in the exportation of this article for this period. Siquiera is the most eligible of all the Portugueze ports not actually blockaded, to proceed to with our Cargoes.\nPlease to accept of my sincere thanks for the Presidents Message & the report of Mr. Gallatin. I was highly gratified with the internal picture of internal prosperity which they presented; and it does as much honor to the wisdom of the Presidents administration as it is a Source of felicity to our fellow Citizens. I do now, as I always have very much wished, that no foreign collision should mar this happy prospect; but as there appears to be no bound to the interested, but false policy of Gt. Britain; I must doubt whether We can avoid a contest. If it comes to this, We doubtless shall lose much, but it must prove ruinous to them, without a greater Share of good fortune than can reasonably be calculated on. I wait with impatience to hear the event.\nAs no opportunity offered for any port in the Chesapeake, nor does there appear much chance of a conveyance for some time to come, I have taken the liberty to Ship your order of a pipe of Bucellos & a pipe of Lisbon with a quarter Cask of Port, all old & of the best quality, by the Brig Hetty Andrew Morehouse Master, address\u2019d to the Collector of New York subject to your orders. I am sensible Sir of the risk attending the Shipment, but as it appears not improbable that the risk may daily increase, I thought you would prefer its being taken now than hazarding its not being at all shipped.\nAs my wish to change my Station is founded on the present Situation & future prospect of this Country, which in no case seems to alter, I still entertain a wish for the appointment of Consul for Bahia de St. Salvador, but should any motives induce the President to decline conferring on me this place, & he has no objection to my retaining my present Office, to prevent any disadvantages which might result from its being known that I had Solicited a Change of place, I have not divulged it to any person whatever this side the Water.\nWill you do me the favour Sir to make my best respects to your worthy Lady, & to say to her, that I am sorry the trifles which I have taken the liberty to send were not more deserving of her merit. With entire Respect I Remain Sir Yr Most devoted Servt.\nWilliam Jarvis", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2758", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Armstrong, Jr., 28 February 1808\nFrom: Armstrong, John, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nParis 28 Feb 1808.\nHaving received no answer to my 2d. letter of the 14th. of February from M. de Champagny and having room for new complaints with regard to the mode in which the Imperial decrees of Novemb. 1806 and Decemb. 1807 have been made to operate, I determined to ask an audience of the Prince of Benevent and seek from him as head of the Diplomatic functions in France, Such explanations as H. M\u2019s ministers might be authorised or permitted to give. This audience was immediately accorded, and I have this moment returned from it. To spare you, and myself the circumlocution, which in interviews of this kind cannot be avoided, I will put down only the substance of my complaints and of the Prince\u2019s answer.\nComplaints\n1o. The Ship Vermont was captured on the 14th. of March last under the decree of Nov. 21. 1806, and carried into Porto Ferrajo. The Cause was immediately brought before the Council of Prizes, and Judgment of restitution with costs of suit, damages and interest given against the Captors. This judgment bears date the 2d. day of September last but, astonishing as it may appear, it is yet unexecuted. Nor is this all Before the party captured could repossess himself even of his cargo, he was constrained to give bond to the full amount thereof, and because he would not renounce his rights to costs damages and interest, which had been awarded by Judgment of H. M\u2019s Council of Prizes, he has been deprived of his personal liberty.\nIn this case I claim from H. M.\u2019s justice the full and prompt execution of the judgment of H. Council of Prizes, the immediate liberation of Capt. Lyman and the punishment of those who have acted thus injustly & illegally towards him.\n2d. The Ship Speculator on her return voyage to the U. S. from Amsterdam, was captured under the decree of the 17th. of December and brought into Calais. On the first interrogation of the crew every man of it declared that the Ship had not been visited. A Second interrogation took place a few days afterwards when the first and second mates who had already declared that the Ship had not been visited, now declared that she had been visited Yet is their Ship detained on the credit of men who have thus discredited themselves.\n3d. The Brig Edward has been Seized under the decree of December last and Sequestered on the ground that She had been visited by a British boat. It is however well ascertained that the visiting boat carried only french colors, that she hailed in the french language, and that (contrary to the usage of British vessels) her commander refused to endorse the Brig\u2019s papers, Whence arises the presumption that the boat was french & not English. But whether french or English is of no importance Since it must be admitted that the visit was made within three marine leagues of the Shore; and of Course, within the jurisdictional limits of France. I will not Suggest the Consequences to be drawn from this fact. They are obvious. Yet is this Ship Seized and Sequestred.\n4. The last and by much the most important case, I shall mention is that of the Ship Charleston Packet, which after regular entry into and clearance from the port of Bourdeaux, has been Seized and Sequestred under the authority of the December decree, because She had been visited by British Cruisers on the 2d. day of October and 3d. of December 1807: for the one case, fifty six, & in the other, fourteen days before the date of the law, which forms the pretext for the violence which has been exercised towards her. If it is H. M.\u2019s intention that His decree of December Should not only operate from its date, (which would however be extremely unjust) but even before it\u2019s date, it is certainly incumbent upon Some one of his Ministers to avow the doctrine, So that I may be able to apprise My Government of the whole meaning of the decree in question.\nIt is principally Sir, this abuse, which gives to H. M.\u2019s decree a retroactive operation, thus violating an Axiom of french law as well of all other law that has induced me to ask from your H. this audience, and to entreat that (as the head of the Diplomatic functions in France,) you would be pleased to carry these complaints to H. M. and obtain from him Such an explanation of the decree in question as Shall not only put an end to this particular abuse but to all others in which the retroactive principle may be discovered.\"\nAnswer.\n\"I have repeatedly heard H. M. explain himself in relation to american affairs, & I have always believed that it was both his desire and intention to be on good terms with your Government. I shall however take much pleasure in Speaking to H. M. on this Subject, & in obtaining the explanations you wish. These you will receive, through the ordinary channel of the Department of foreign relations, and I invite you to repeat to the Minister of that Dept. what you have just now communicated to me.\"\nOn this last suggestion I wrote the following note to the Minister of Exterior Relations:\nSir It is not the object of this communication to say anything in addition to what I have already Said against the principles laid down in the Imperial decrees of the 21 of Nov. 1806, and 17 December 1807. My present complaints are of a different character and are Strictly confined to instances in which these very principles have been violated. It is in this view I present Y. Ex. with the following paper the Substance of which was verbally communicated to H. H. the Prince of Benenvent this morning.\n(Signed) John Armstrong", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2760", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Speaker of the House of Representatives, 29 February 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Speaker of the House of Representatives\nSir,\nDepartment of State February 29. 1808\nIn obedience to a resolution of the House of Representatives of the 9t. Ulto. I have the honor to lay before them the inclosed abstract of seamen, registered in the several collection Districts of the United States, for the years 1806 & 1807, in pursuance of the act for the relief and protection of American seamen. I have the honor to be Sir, with great respect, your most Obt. Set.\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2762", "content": "Title: From John Graham to Col. Josiah Quincy, 29 February 1808\nFrom: Graham, John\nTo: Quincy, Col. Josiah\nSir\nDepartment of State 29th. Feby 1808\nMay I be permitted to enquire whether the Committee of which you are the Chairman wish a Report from this office in reply to your Letter of the 13th. Inst. We had made some Progress in it when the last Information was received from Algiers, which led to a beleif that it might not be wanted. It was in consequence laid aside to give place to some more urgent business; but if you wish it, it will be again taken up. With Sentiments of the Highest Respect I have the Honor to be Sir Your Mo: Obt Sert\nJohn Graham\nCheif Clerk Dept of State", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2763", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Robert Smith, 29 February 1808\nFrom: Smith, Robert\nTo: Madison, James\nNavy Depart. 29 Feby 1808\nI enclose you a copy of a letter from Messrs. Carl & Allston with their Signatures for your information.\nRt. Smith", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "02-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2764", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Frederick Degen, 29 February 1808\nFrom: Degen, Frederick\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nNaples 29th. February 1808\nI have the honor to transmit herewith to your Excellency, a Copy of my respects of the 28th. December, as also a Duplicate List of the few american vessels which arrived at this Port the last Six months of the year 1807. The two Schooners therein mentioned as laid up in consequence of the late difficulties with Algiers, were going home in Ballast since the Settlement of this Business, by Mr. Lear left them nothing more to fear from that quarter, but a General Embargo ordered by the Government, has thus far prevented them from Sailing and they are consequently yet in this Port.\nTwo american Ships arrived lately at Gallipoli (a Port of this Kingdom in the Adriatique) to load Oil of the growth of that Country; but agreeable to the last Decrees of H. M. the Emperor Napoleon, confirmed by the King of Naples in his Dominions, the exportation of the Produces of this country is prohibited. I however obtained permission for one of them to load owing to Some particular Circumstances, but with a Declaration that no Such indulgence Should be granted in future.\nI annex herewith a Copy of Mr. Lear\u2019s Circular, and remain with the highest respect Sir Your obedt. humbl. Serv\nFredk Degen", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2767", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Hollins, 1 March 1808\nFrom: Hollins, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nBaltimore 1st. March 1808\nOn reading the annexed copy of an order for insurance, I concluded at first to have, sent it to you unaccompanied by any remark, but upon reflection I have changed my mind, in consequence of a publication I lately read in a Newspaper, that the Governor of Bermuda had come to a determination, not to allow any vessel touching there with provisions, to proceed to any other place or Island. For the truth however of the publication I can not answer, but in substance is probably true; & admitting it to be so, the Ship Monticello, must certainly have a particular pass, shewing it (the Cargo) to be British property\nIn my capacity, as Presidt. of the Maryd. Insce. Co., I too frequently see orders for Insurance, from Philada. & New York, & from what are called very respectable houses, who unblushingly cover the property of British, French, & Spanish subjects. It is therefore no wonder, that our Country is insulted & abused by the Nations of Europe, by Captures & condemnations &c &c. Happily however this covering of property, is by no means general, & it is much to be regretted that some law coud not be framed to reach the Agressors, who so shamefully disgrace themselves & their Country.\nYou will be pleased to excuse the liberty I use, & believe me very respectfully Yr. Mo. obdt. st.\nJno. Hollins\nI have written to the collectors of New York & Passamaquody.\nA. G.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2768", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Thomas Auldjo, 1 March 1808\nFrom: Auldjo, Thomas\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nCowes 1 March 1808\nI had the honor to write you 17th. of January & now send you a copy thereof enclosed Since that period one only of the American Ships sent into the ports of my district in consequence of the orders of Council, has proceeded to her destined port Amsterdam. The rest of them have either gone to London to unload their Cargoes or remain where they were, in anxious hope, that the packet daily expected, will bring eventual instructions from the Owners & Shippers in America.\nOur prices of wheat are 8/ 6 a 8/ 9 Pr bushel. I am very respectfully Sir Your most obd hble Sr\nThomas Auldjo", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2769", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Bankson, 1 March 1808\nFrom: Bankson, John\nTo: Madison, James\nHonor\u2019d Sir,\nMarch 1st. .08\nThe period has arrived when the Counsels of the Nation are called on to provide for the common defence of our Country. I have for some time past been of the opinion, seconded by Genl. Stricker, of Baltimore and a few other revolutionary characters, that there would be a propriety, exclusive of raising additional Regiments of regular troops, to apportion the United States into four Sections, or Districts, and that Congress would authorise the President to appoint an Inspector to each of those districts, whose duty it should be to Inspect the troops, introduce a uniform system of discipline, Inspect the Arms &c. &c. and report from time to time, to the Secretary at War, the actual state of the same. It appears the more necessary as the difficulty of obtaining returns from the respective states has been sensibly experienced. I am the more induced to recommend this measure from the great benefits experienced in the revolutionary War. Having received a Commission of a first Lieutenant, in the 1st. Continental Regt., raised in Pennsylv. Commissioned November 25, 1775, and continuing in active service to the termination of the War, a considerable part of that period as Inspector of the Pensylv. troops, and at the Siege of Yorktown (by order of Genl. Washington) Inspector of the Pensyl. and Maryland Brigades, which after the Capture of Ld. Cornwallis, marched to So. Carolina, and joined Genl. Greene, and knowing the importance of the duty as considered by the Commander in Chief (particularly after the appointment of Baron Steuben) I hope Sir, it will not be consider\u2019d presumptive in the liberty now taken.\nI make no doubt, should the recommendation be approbated, there may be found suitable characters who have survived with reputation since the struggle of 1776, that would accept the appointments, and be satisfied for their services to receive the Rank, pay &c. of a Colonel of Infantry of the United States. All which is respectfully submitted, by your friend, and obedt. Servt.\nJno. Bankson\nN. I take the liberty of enclosing the Copy of a Letter from Doctor Mc.Henry, to Genl. Washington, as it has resspect to the duties herein subjoined. If the within remarks should meet your concurrence, will be thankful if you will make it known to the president of the United States", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2770", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Lee, 1 March 1808\nFrom: Lee, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nBordeaux March 1: 1808\nThe Journal of the day contains the following article, \"Le Conseil des Prizes en execution de l\u2019art: 8 du Decret Imperiale, du 21 Novre. 1806 a prononc\u00e9 la confiscation au profit de L\u2019etat du navaire sous pavillon Americain The Fame saisi par les preposes de Douanes de Bordeaux le 8. aout, 1808 pour en etre dispose conformement 8 du dit Decret.\"\nThis is a sea letter Vessel partly owned I believe by a french house in this City. During the course of the last summer she was engaged in the trade between Holland and England with a special permission from the King of Holland.\nLarge bodies of troops continue marching through our city, and preparations are making for the reception of the Emperor who has been hourly expecting for some days. The best informed men both at Paris and in this place feel now persuaded that the United States will escape engaging in the contest on either side. They draw their conclusions from the belief that the Embargo will be kept on and that we shall be content to live without commerce until the conflict is ended.\nThe French it is said have taken possession of the strong fortress of Pampeluna in Upper Navarre about fifty miles from Bayonne. Prince Murat left this City at noon All the Imperial Guards & other troops to the amount of about five thousand follow after him. The Emperors mamelukes arrived yesterday and he is expected after tomorrow. It is understood that seventy thousand troops are still to pass thru this place in the course of ten or fifteen days. These with what have already passed will make at least two hundred thousand men. The monks of Spain are hiding their treasure and flying in every direction. With great respect your obedient Servant\nWm: Lee", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2771", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Jarvis, 1 March 1808\nFrom: Jarvis, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nLisbon 1st: March 1808\nInclosed are copies of the two letters which I had the honor to address to you under date of 18th: & 25th: Ultimo, the former of which went by the Ship Sally & Hetty Captn. Fleming & the latter by the Brig Fame, Captn. Howe for Philadelphia & Providence. In consequence of the impressment of several Seamen out of a Kniphausen vessel, which Sailed ten days or a fortnight ago, by the Squadron blockading the port, & her consequent return, our vessels were again stopped in port. I applied to the General in Chief, Junot, on the Subject, & after some conversation, His Excellency promised to let them proceed, but their passports being delayed for several days, although my Vice Consul applied several times for them, I again called on him the 2 & after a little conversation he took me into his cabinet & called for the passports, wrote some little additional instructions at the foot, to the Naval Commandant, he signed four, being for all the vessels in the port & presented them to me. He was very polite & talked of the prospect of a rupture between the United States & Gt. Britain The vessels of the Hans Towns have not yet got leave to Sail, & some doubts are entertained, whether they will or not. I was averse to the sailing of these four vessels before I got permission from General Junot, to send a flag of Truce, to know of the Blockading Admiral, whether they would be allowed to proceed but the Captains & Supercargoes conceiving that there was no danger, & seeming unwilling to subject themselves to the I relinquished the idea. All of them entered after the Blockade took place, but without the least Knowledge of it.\nThe Marquis better known by the name of General Solano, the Spanish Commander South of the Tagus, two days ago came to take his leave of General Junot, as by some new arrangement, the Spanish troops remove to Algarva, and French troops under the command of General Kellerman, the Younger, are to take possession of all the Country between the Tagus & Algarva.\nIt is currently reported, generally beleived, and I imagine it to be a fact, that the heads of all the branches of the Bragan\u00e7a family who Still remain here, accompanied by several other nobility, are to go on a deputation to the Emperor, whom they are to meet at Bayonne the 15th: of April, and it is said by the desire of the Emperor himself. The object of the deputation is not known; but it is generally beleived that it relates to the future arrangement of the Kingdom. Some say that the deputation will pray the Emperor to nominate a King; but I beleive that nothing certain is known as to its object, although I there is no question that such a deputation is going. Perhaps it is only on a mere visit of compliment.\nI shall probably be able to leave here for St Lucar the day after to-morrow. If possible to avoid it I shall not extend my stay beyond the last of this month. With perfect Respect I have the honor, Sir Yr Mo: Ob: Serv\nWilliam Jarvis\nP. S. I have this moment from the best authority, that the French troops are to take possession of the whole of Portugal, as well as the Country surrounding Porto, while all the Spanish troops are to retire into Spain.\nI hope Govmt. will not think me importunate in mentioning again my wish to exchange my present Station for the Consulate of Bahia de St. Salvador.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2772", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Stokely, 1 March 1808\nFrom: Stokely, John\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nca. March 1, 1808\nIt seems to me that active means, at this time, are necessary on our Parts for defence on everry quarter, and the parts most detachd & exposed are Intitled to Particular attention. I conceive above all, New Orleans appears to be in danger. Upon that City about one fifth of the active citizens of the union wholy depends for a market. About N. York, and Philadelphia People are numerous & if either of them cities were taken, the strong arm of the neighbouring Citizens would Shortly reclaim them or Either of them, & in the meantime they could recourse to other convenient Tho. inferior Ports. But Sir the Loss of Orleans compleatly Shuts the door of Commerce Against all the Western People, and easy as it may appear for an army to pass down Ohio & Mississippi rivers, and to wrest that port from the hands of an Enimy, It might be found deficualt. It is a great distance from any Great Body of our Citizens. The Mississippi runing through an Extensive uninhabited Country, having a few and only afew commmanding hights upon it, an enimy in Possession of Orleans would Imediatly Strive to Possess Some of These hights which might be easily fortified & Garrisoned, in Such a Manner as to Prevent boats from Passing, (and Floating Batteries cannot be Mannaged on that river). The British Navy would easily Prevent us from going to Orleans by sea; and to march Troops There by Land would be attended with many Inconveniencies & many deficualties, that is not Generally foreseen. Conceiving as I do that the Loss of Orleans would be more sensibly felt by our Governmt. than the loss, of any Two or Three other ports in the union, I think it would be Prudent, to provide Some means to Prevent Such a catastrophe. Suppose an Invitation Should be offered to afew companies or Regiments who Should Volunteer in the defense of that Country, & who Should Occupy Some or all of the hights on the Mississippi but Principally be stationed on them hights, nearest to Orleans and Some at N Orleans according to the direction of the Govr: or Commander at that place & that every Such Volunteer Should find himself a Good Gun (& cloaths at least for 6, months) and that the Public Should after that Term; If Such Soldier or Should be calld or continued in Actual Service allow each and Every Such Soldier or cloaths as is allowed other troops but If Furloughed (as they ought to be, Provided danger Still Seem to threaten distantly) but ought not to be permited to Leave that quarter unless on Some Special Command at any time or unless Permited by the Govr. or Commander in Chief, for the Term of years, & that at any time when it Should be thought Proper to Furlough Such men that from and after the receiving of Such Furlough every Such Officer & Soldier Furloughed in a settled Country Should find him Self in Provisions on being intitled to one Weeks, Previous notice or one weeks rations at the time of being So furloughed, that Such Officer & Soldier altho on Furlough Should ever be ready to Joyn his Corps, at the Sound of an alarm for and during the time of his ingagement, and that Each Such officer & Soldier Should for Such Service be allowed acres of Land in Some Part of that Southern Country over and above their Pay cloathing & rations. I do think Sir that Something of this kind Should be done in order to reinforce that Part of our Country, & Imediately too. It ought however to be Provided that Those volunteers Should consist of Men from any of the United States, But not from the Teritories. I am Sir your obedt. Servt (& in hast)\nJohn Stokely\nN. B. This Embargo will prevent hundreds of the Monongalians & Kentucky People from going to Orleans the Ensuing Spring, unless Some Principle Shall be adopted to incurage them, & think the above would do that", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2774", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Levett Harris, 4 March 1808\nFrom: Harris, Levett\nTo: Madison, James\nTriplicate.\nSir,\nSt. Petersburg 22 Feb/ 4 March 1808.\nI have the honor to transmit You the herewith inclosed Copy of a declaration of this Court explaining the present state of its relations with that of Sweden, which was communicated to me by the Imperial Ministry the 13 Ult.\nAs our intercourse with England through Sweden is now at an end, I have no means of writing You but by way of France or Holland, from whence opportunities to the United States, I learn, have become as rare as they are precarious. In addition to my last however, of the 14/ 26 Jany. I have little very new to communicate: preparations of defense are Still going on in the several Russian ports of the Baltic, and we anxiously await the opening of the navigation to see what measures of hostility will be pursued by those powers who have the means and the supposed intention of making this Sea their principal Theatre of war the ensuing Spring.\nA Russian Army is now on its march through Sweden Finland. Hostilities between these two Powers have already commenced.\nThe Count Romanzoff has been confirmed in the office of Minister of Foreign Affairs, Genl. de Budberg having taken his final leave of the Service. To this department has been added that of Commerce, which Count Romanzoff previously held, and which two posts in future, \u2018tis said. are to remain united.\nThis Government have yet taken no measures against the entry of Neutral Vessels coming from England and having on board even English manufactures; but events now So rapidly succeed each other and influence So immediately upon Commerce that it is impossible to Say what may not be done in relation to this when the Shipping Season opens as Russia appears firmly determined to persevere in the system She, in conjunction with other Continental States, has embraced in the hope that a lasting peace may thereby be secured to Europe & all its benifits be Safely maintained.\nI am Still without any advices from You, Sir. The last news we have here from America, received through Paris & Hamburg papers, and no later than the 10. December. I have the honor to be, with great Respect &c. &c. &c.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2776", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Leander Cathcart, 4 March 1808\nFrom: Cathcart, James Leander\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nMadeira 4th: March 1808\nI am sorry to inform You that on the th: Ulto: the British Privateer Brig Caroline, Commanded by Charles Jones, brought into these Roads the American Ship Manchester, Joseph Reynolds Master, Owned by John James Mercht. of Philadelphia, detained by her since the 19th. Ulto., on pretence that the said Ship had incurred the Penalty inflicted on Neutrals by the British Order of Council of the 11: of Novemr. last.\nThe Manchester sailed from Cadiz on the 15: February loaded with Salt, Wine and Fruit, and was bound direct to Philadelphia and had on board Nineteen Spanish Passengers, the Names of whom are enclosed & whom have been permitted to land here with all their Bagage and have taken Passage on board the American Ship Hare John Barry Master, bound direct to New York. Consequently the only Loss these Passengers have Sustained is the loss of time, Expense of transporting their Effects from the Manchester to the Hare, & the Money paid to Capn. Barry for their Passage in said Ship, as they had paid Capn. Reynolds for their Passage when they left Cadiz.\nThere being no Court of Admiralty in this Island, Competent to Adjudicate in the Case of the Ship Manchester, She Sailed in Company with the Privateer on the 2d: Inst. bound to England for Adjudication. Capn: Barry having declared that he will not take Letters, and this going privately by one of the Passengers, I forbear forwarding to You my Correspondence with the British Governor, and other Documents Relevant of the Subject, which you may expect by the first good Opportunity. In anxious Expectation to Know the Result of our Negotiation with Great Britain, I have the honor to Continue with the most Respectful Esteem Sir Your most obedt. Servt.\nJames Leander Cathcart", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2777", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Jarvis, 4 March 1808\nFrom: Jarvis, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nTwo or three gun boats & some row boats attempted to enter the Tagus the last night covered by a frigate & Sloop of War, but being discovered they were foed by the Bougie, a Small Castle, on a spit of Sand, at the mouth of the harbour. To take off the attention of the Castle from the boats & to Secure their retreat, the Sloop of War ed on the Castle, but in going about got aground & shortly after got off. The boats got clear, with little or no injury to the Castle & it is supposed no great harm to them or the Ships. Respectfully\nWm Jarvis", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2779", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Josef Yznardy, 4 March 1808\nFrom: Yznardy, Josef\nTo: Madison, James\nHonored Sir,\nConsular Office of the United States Cadiz March fourth 1808.\nPermit me Sir to apologize for molesting your attention so frequently, but considering that I am under a precise necessity to defend myself against the machinations of my persecutor Mr. Meade, by whose influence alone I am wrongly involved and d.\nThe Schooner Lucana of Boston from Philadelphia to Lisbon not being permitted to enter by the British Squadron was forced to look for another Port ing a Strong Gale which shattered her much & was cast away on the Coast called 12 miles distant from any Town, on the Night of the 2d. January last.\nA few hours after the Vessel struck Mr. Matheo Gomez a resident at Tarifa dispatch\u2019d me an Express with advice of the misfortune and began making the Salvage. At the return of the Express I appointed him my Agent obtaining the necessary protection from the General of the Province. me the better part of the Cargo was saved consisting of Flour & Butter considerably damag\u2019d I wrote several Letters to the Captain to leave the Salvage to the care of my Agent, deliver him the papers belonging to the Schooner, and extend his Protest, and that I would advertise the Cargo & for Sale agreable and conformable as the Laws of the Country permitted, which does not allow any person to interfere in the like transactions but the Consuls or their Agents.\nA few days after appeared on the beach a Clerk of Mr. Meade with a Youngman saying he was a Supercargo with whom the Captain joined and treated Mr. Gomez in a low manner and not permitting him to proceed in the business, and would not, either by fair words & persuasions deliver the Papers, nor give proofs, but began to dispose of part of the property, to which ered with the protection of the Governor at Tarifa, & made a proper Inventory; considering the longer said property remain\u2019d on the beach would prejudice the Concerneds, I advertised it for Sale in a legal manner, which took place on the 30. ultimo, with the same & rectitude as I have always operated in such cases since the Office is under my charge. The proceeds has been deposited in my Chests. After all was concluded the Supercargo came round here, complaining bitterly of the Conduct of Mr. Gomez, saying that if he was left to operate as he pleased, the Sale would amount to much more, and that as Consignee he was plundered of his property; I asked him where he had the vouchers to prove the same. He said he had enter\u2019d a Protest, and that he would publish the transaction in America & me th I answer\u2019d with all Kind of moderation that such Proofs were to be made here, as otherwise could not hear evidence. I demanded of him the Invoice and instructions from the Shippers but he did not think proper to give me the least Satisfaction; the day following he demanded of me the Nett proceeds which was near twelve thousand dollars, and my Answer was that when he satisfied me that he was sufficiently empower\u2019d, it would be delivered; then he exhibited to me a Bill Lading Enquiring of him if the Captain had made a Protest, he replied he I told him untill he presented to me proper Vouchers I would not deliver him the pro I wanted to Know if the property was insured & if he wished to make an abandonment\nFrom the 8th. untill this day this Youngman has been constantly plaguing me on the same When the Process came from Tarifa joined to it a Charterparty from the Shippers & a Bill of Lading by which appears the Cargo Consigned to him, and without entering into further Questions I offered him the Nt. Proceeds, to prove that my intentions never were to hold them and not Knowing whether he remaind satisfied, and the Mate and three Sailors belonging to the Schooner having come round here, I thought proper to demand before the Lord Mayor of the manner in which Mr. Gomez conducted himself, to free me from any Responsibility of which declarations I enclose a legal Copy Marked A remaining with the Original. Under B. a Copy of the 7th. Article of the Convention respecting the priviledges granted to the French & American Consuls in this Kingdom & by which I govern my opperations. Of course the Law of the U. S. respecting Consuls & V. Consuls has no force as I have m long ago to that Office. Under C will be found a Copy of the Process made at appearing by the same that the Supercargo has bid twice at the Sale, and also one Burlini an Agent for Mr. Meade; which proves that when they did not bid more it was because the articles did not deserve it; Said Process contains every transaction & ligi in one form, which I enclose with the only view to prove my conduct in every respect & satisfy you Sir, as I am not to fear any other; advising the Shippers Messrs. English and land of Philadelphia that they will find those Documents at that Office.\nMr. Meade afew days ago brought himself in to an ugly and disagreable situation (in the Smuggling business) and notwithstanding that the Goods were found in his Stores, he gave very and low words to the Commandant of the Revenue who is a Captain of a Frigate. In consequence orders were given to Embargo his House, Books & Papers & he lodged in the Castle, for which purpose they wanted that I should assist, but could not, being Sick. My Agent Mr: M.Cann went and obtained that the orders should not be executed, all which has been granted & responded on my behalf, and is in recompense of the treatment I have received from him. I hope the business will be settled with the loss of the goods say 13000. pounds Cinnamon Cocoa and Charges; be pleased Sir to remember what I mentioned when Commodore Campbell of the Constitution was here in July 06.\nI repeat Sir that it griefs me to a high degree to be so molesting but I am sure you will pardon me, and that my Conduct merits & will merit your approbation, and the proceedings will satisfy that this office nor the Ports belonging to its Districts is d; assuring you Sir that if the Wreack &ca. had not been interfered by me, the Underwriters I know for certain the property is Insured) would have suffer\u2019d almost atotal loss; and that yo the neat proceeds will satisfy the Concerneds of my legal and upright management. With Sentiments of high Consideration and Respect, I am Honored Sir, Your most obedt. Hble. Servant\nJosef Yznardy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2781", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Armstrong, Jr., 5 March 1808\nFrom: Armstrong, John, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nParis 5 March 1808.\nI forward to you copies of five notes which I have had occasion to write (since the date of my last dispatch) to the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Marine, in relation to certain abuses which have been practised by functionaries of France against our Commerce &c. To neither of those Notes have I yet received an answer. With very high Consideration, Sir, I am Your Most obedient & very humble Servant,\nJohn Armstrong", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2782", "content": "Title: From James Madison to George Henry Rose, 5 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Rose, George Henry\nSir,\nDepartment of State March 5th. 1808\nI have had the honor to receive and lay before the President your letter of the 26th. January, in which you state that you are \"expressly precluded by your instructions from entering upon any negotiation for the adjustment of the differences arising from the encounter of His Britannic Majesty\u2019s ship Leopard and the Frigate of the United States the Chesapeake, as long as the Proclamation of the President of the 2d. of July 1807 shall be in force.\"\nThis demand Sir, might justly suggest the simple answer, that before the Proclamation of the President could become a subject of consideration, satisfaction should be made for the acknowledged aggression which preceded it. This is evidently agreeable to the order of time, to the order of reason, and, it may be added, to the order of usage as maintained by Great Britain, whenever in analagous cases, she has been the complaining party.\nBut as you have subjoined to the preliminary demand, certain explanations with a view doubtless to obviate such an answer, it will best accord with the candor of the President, to meet them with such a review of the whole subject as will present the solid grounds on which he regards such a demand, as inadmissible.\nI begin with the occurrences from which the Proclamation of July 2d. resulted. These are in general terms referred to by the instrument itself. A more particular notice of the most important of them, will there be in place.\nPassing over then, the habitual but minor irregularities of His Britannic Majesty\u2019s ships of war, in making the hospitalities of our ports subservient to the annoyance of our trade, both outward and inward, a practice not only contrary to the principles of public law, but expressly contrary to British ordinances enforced during maritime wars to which she bore a neutral relation, I am constrained, unwelcome as the task is, to call your attention to the following more prominent instances.\nIn the summer of the year 1804, the British frigate the Cambrian with other cruizers in company, entered the harbour of New York. The commander, Capt. Bradley, in violation of the port laws relating both to health and revenue, caused a merchant vessel just arrived, and confessedly within the limits and under the authority of the UStates to be boarded by persons under his command, who, after resisting the officers of the port in the legal exercise of their functions, actually impressed and carried off a number of seamen and passengers, into the service of the ships of war. On an appeal to his voluntary respect for the laws, he first failed to give up the offender to justice, and finally repelled the officer charged with the regular process for the purpose.\nThis procedure was not only a flagrant insult to the Sovereignty of the Nation, but an infraction of its neutrality also, which did not permit a belligerent ship thus to augment its force within the neutral territory.\nTo finish the scene, this commander went so far as to declare, in an official letter, to the Minister Plenipotentiary of His Britannic Majesty and by him communicated to this Government that he considered his ship, whilst lying in the harbour of New York as having dominion around her, within the distance of her buoys.\nAll these circumstances were duly made known to the British Government, in just expectation of honorable reparation. None has ever been offered. Capt. Bradley was advanced from his frigate to the commands of a ship of the line.\nAt a subsequent period, several British frigates under the Command of Capt. Whitby of the Leander, pursuing the practice of vexing the inward and outward trade of our ports and hovering for that purpose about the entrance of that of N. York closed a series of irregularities, with an attempt to arrest a coasting vessel, on board of which an American Citizen was killed by a cannon ball which entered the vessel whilst within less than a mile from the shore.\nThe blood of a citizen thus murdered, in a trade from one to another port of his own Country, and within the sanctuary of its territorial jurisdiction, could not fail to arouse the sensibility of the public and to make a solemn appeal to the justice of the British Government. The case was presented moreover to that Government by this in the accent which it required; and with due confidence that the offender would receive the exemplary punishment which he deserved. That there might be no failure of legal proof of a fact sufficiently notorious of itself unexceptionable witnesses to establish it were sent to Great Britain at the expence of the UStates.\nCapt. Whitby was notwithstanding honorably acquitted; no animadversion took place on any other officer belonging to the Squadron; nor has any apology or explanation been made since the trial was over, as a conciliatory offering to the disappointment of this Country at such a result.\nA case of another character occurred in the month of Sept. 1806. The Impetueux, a french ship of 74 guns, when aground within a few hundred yards of the shore of North Carolina, and therefore visibly within the territorial jurisdiction and hospitable protection of the United States, was fired upon, boarded and burnt, from three British ships of war, under the command of Capt. Douglass. Having completed this outrage on the Sovereignty and neutrality of the United States, the British Commander felt no scruple in proceeding thence into the waters near Norfolk, nor in the midst of the hospitalities enjoyed by him to add to what had passed a refusal to discharge from his ship, impressed Citizens of the UStates not denied to be such, on the plea that the Government of the U States had refused to surrender to the demand of Admiral Berkley, certain seamen alleged to be British deserters; a demand which it is well understood your Government disclaims any right to make.\nIt would be very superfluous to dwell on the features which mark this aggravated insult. But I must be permitted to remind you that in so serious a light, was a similar violation of neutral territory, by the destruction of certain French ships on the coast of Portugal, by a British squadron under the command of Admiral Boscawan, regarded by the Court of Great Britain that a Minister Extraordinary was despatched for the express purpose of expiating the aggression on the Sovereignty of a friendly power.\nLastly presents itself, the attack by the British ship of War Leopard, on the American frigate Chesapeake, a case too familiar in all its circumstances to need a recital of any part of them. It is sufficient to remark that the conclusive evidence which this event added to that which had preceded, of the uncontrouled excesses, of the British Naval Commanders, in insulting our sovereignty, and abusing our hospitality, determined the President to extend to all British armed ships, the precaution heretofore applied to a few by name, of interdicting to them the use and privileges of our harbours and waters.\nThis was done by his proclamation of July 2 1807, referring to the series of occurrences, ending with the aggression on the Frigate Chesapeake, as the considerations requiring it. And if the apprehension from the licencious spirit of the British naval commanders, thus developed and uncontrouled, which led to this measure of precaution, could need other justification than was afforded by what had passed, it would be amply found in the subsequent conduct of the Ships under the command of the same Capt. Douglass.\nThis Officer neither admonished by reflections on the crisis produced by the attack on the Chesapeake, nor controuled by respect for the law of Nations, or the laws of the land, did not cease within our waters to bring to by firing at vessels pursuing their regular course of trade; and in the same spirit which had displayed itself in the recent outrage committed on the American frigate he not only indulged himself in hostile threats and in indications of a hostile approach to Norfolk, but actually obstructed our Citizens in the ordinary communication between that and neighbouring places. His proceedings constituted in fact, a blockade of the port, and as real an invasion of the Country, according to the extent of his force, as if troops had been debarked, and the town besieged on the land side.\nWas it possible for the Chief Magistrate of a nation who felt for its rights and its honor to do less than interpose some measure of precaution at least against the repetition of enormities which had been so long uncontrouled, by the Government whose officers had committed them, and which had at last taken the exorbitant shape of hostility and of insult seen in the attack on the Frigate Chesapeake? Candor will pronounce that less could not be done; and it will as readily admit that the proclamation, comprizing that measure could not have breathed a more temperate spirit, nor spoken in a more becoming tone. How far it has received from those, whose intrusions it prohibited the respect due to the national authority, or been made the occasion of new indignities needs no explanation.\nThe President having interposed this precautionary interdict lost no time in instructing the Minister Plenipotentiary of the UStates to represent to the British Govt. the signal aggression which had been committed on their Sovereignty and their flag and to require the satisfaction due for it; indulging the expectation that His Britannic Majesty would at once perceive it to be the truest magnanimity as well as the strictest justice to offer that prompt and full expiation of an acknowledged wrong which would reestablish and improve both in fact and in feeling, the state of things which it had violated.\nThis expectation was considered as not only honorable to the sentiments of His Majesty, but was supported by known examples, in which, being the complaining party, he had required and obtained, as a preliminary to any counter complaints whatever, a precise replacement of things, in every practicable circumstance in their preexisting situation.\nThus in the year 1764 Bermudians and other British subjects, who had according to annual custom, taken possession of Turks Island for the season of making salt, having been forcibly removed with their vessels and effects by a french detachment from the Island of St. Domingo, to which Turks Island was alleged to be an appurtenance, the British Ambassador at Paris, in pursuance of instructions from his Government, demanded, as a satisfaction for the violence committed, that the proceedings should be disavowed, the intention of acquiring Turks Island disclaimed orders given for the immediate abandonment of it on the part of the French, every thing restored to the condition in which it was at the time of the aggression, and reparation made of the damages which any British subjects should be found to have sustained, according to an estimation to be settled, between the Governors of St. Domingo and Jamaica. A compliance with the whole of this demand was the result.\nAgain:-- In the year 1789 certain English Merchants having opened a trade at Nootka sound on the Northwest coast of America, and attempted a settlement at that place, the Spaniards who had long claimed that part of the world as their exclusive property, dispatched a frigate from Mexico, which captured two English vessels engaged in the trade, and broke up the settlement on the coast. The Spanish Government was the first to complain, in this case, of the intrusions committed by the British Merchants. The British Government however demanded that the vessels taken by the Spanish frigate should be restored, and adequate satisfaction granted, previous to any other discussion.\nThis demand prevailed; the Spanish Government agreeing to make full restoration of the captured vessels, and to indemnify the parties interested in them for the losses sustained. They restored also the buildings and tracts of land of which the British subjects had been dispossessed. The British however soon gave a proof of the little value they set on the possession by a voluntary dereliction under which it has since remained.\nThe case which will be noted last, tho\u2019 of a date prior to the case of Nootka sound, is that of Falklands Islands. These Islands lie about 100 leagues Eastward of the straights of Magellan. The title to them had been a subject of controversy among several of the maritime nations of Europe. From the position of the Islands and other circumstances, the pretension of Spain bore an advantageous comparison with those of her competitors. In the year 1770 the British took possession of Port Egmont in one of the Islands; the Spaniards being at the time in possession of another part; and protesting against a settlement by the British. The protest being without effect, ships and troops were sent from Buennos Ayres by the Governor of that place, which forcibly dispossessed and drove off the British settlers.\nThe British Government looking entirely to the dispossession by force, demanded as a specific condition of preserving harmony between the two Courts, not only the disavowal of the Spanish proceedings; but that the affairs of that settlement should be immediately restored to the precise state in which they were previous to the act of dispossession. The Spanish Government made some difficulties; requiring particularly a disavowal on the part of Great Britain of the conduct of her officer at Falklands Islands, which, it was alleged, gave occasion to the steps taken by the Spanish Governor; and proposing an adjustment by mutual stipulations in the ordinary forms.\nThe reply was that the moderation of his Britannic Majesty having limited his demand to the smallest reparation he could accept for the injury done, nothing was left for discussion but the mode of carrying the disavowal and restitution into execution; reparation losing its value if it be conditional, and to be obtained by any stipulation whatever from the party injured.\nThe Spanish Government yielded. The violent proceedings of its officers were disavowed. The fort, the port and every thing else were agreed to be immediately restored to the precise situation which had been disturbed; and duplicates of orders issued for the purpose to the Spanish Officers, were delivered into the hands of one of the British principal Secretaries of State. Here again it is to be remarked that satisfaction having been made for the forcible dispossession, the Islands lost their importance in the eyes of the British Government, were in a short time finally evacuated, and Port Egmont remains with every other part of them in the hands of Spain.\nCould stronger pledges have been given, than are here found that an honorable and instant reparation would be made in a case, differing no otherwise from those recited, than as it furnished to the same monarch of a great nation, an opportunity to prove, that adhering always to the same immutable principle, he was as ready to do right to others, as to require it for himself.\nReturning to the instructions given to the Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States at London, I am to observe that the President, thought it just and expedient to insist as a necessary ingredient in the adjustment of the outrage committed on the American frigate, a security against the future practice of British Naval Commanders, in impressing from Merchant vessels of the UStates on the high seas, such of their crews, as they might undertake to denominate British subjects.\nTo this association of the two subjects, the President was determined, first by his regarding both as resting on kindred principles; the immunity of private ships, with the known exceptions made by the law of nations, being as well established as that of public ships; and there being no pretext for including in these exceptions the impressment (if it could be freed from its enormous and notorious abuse) of the subjects of a belligerent by the officers of that belligerent. The rights of a belligerent against the ships of a neutral nation, accrue merely from the relation of the neutral to the other belligerent, as in conveying to him contraband of war or in supplying a blockaded port.\nThe claim of a belligerent to search for and seize on board neutral vessels on the high seas, persons under his allegiance; does not therefore rest on any belligerent right under the law of nations, but on a prerogative derived from municipal law; and involves the extravagant supposition that one nation has a right, to execute at all times and in all cases, its municipal laws and regulations, on board the ships of another nation not being within its territorial limits.\nThe President was led to the same determination 2d. by his desire of converting a particular incident, into an occasion for removing another, and more extensive source of danger to the harmony of the two Countries. And 3dly. by his persuasion, that the liberality of the propositions authorized with this view, would not fail to induce the ready concurrence of His Britannic Majesty; and that the more extensive source of irritation and perplexity, being removed, a satisfactory adjustment of the particular incident would be the less difficult. The President still thinks that such would have been the tendency of the mode for which he had provided, and he cannot therefore but regret that the door was shut against the experiment, by the peremptory refusal of Mr. Canning to admit it into discussion, even in the most informal manner, as was suggested by Mr. Monroe.\nThe President felt the greater regret as the step he had taken towards a more enlarged and lasting accommodation, became thus a bar to the adjustment of the particular and recent aggression which had been committed against the UStates. He found however an alleviation, in the signified purpose of His Britannic Majesty to charge with this adjustment, a special mission to the United States, which, restricted as it was, seemed to indicate a disposition from which a liberal and conciliatory arrangement of one great object at least might be confidently expected.\nIn this confidence, your arrival was awaited with every friendly solicitude; and our first interview having opened the way by an acquiescence in the separation of the two cases insisted on by his Britannic Majesty, notwithstanding the strong grounds on which they had been united by the President, it was not to be doubted that a tender of the satisfaction claimed by the UStates for a distinguished and an acknowledged insult, by one of his officers would immediately follow.\nIt was not therefore without a very painful surprize that the error of this expectation was discovered. Instead of the satisfaction due from the original aggressor, it was announced that the first step towards the adjustment must proceed from the party injured; and your letter now before me, formally repeats, that as long as the proclamation of the President which issued on the 2d. July 1807 shall be in force, it will be an insuperable obstacle to a negotiation even on the subject of the aggression which preceded it; in other words, that the proclamation must be put out of force before an adjustment of the aggression can be taken into discussion.\nIn explaining the grounds of this extraordinary demand, it is alleged to be supported by the consideration that the proceeding and pretension of the offending officer, has been disavowed: that general assurances are given of a disposition and intention in His Britannic Majesty to make satisfaction; that a special Minister was dispatched with promptitude for the purpose of carrying into effect this disposition: and that you have a personal conviction that the particular terms, which you are not at liberty previously to disclose, will be deemed by theU States satisfactory.\nWith respect to the disavowal it would be unjust not to regard it as a proof of candor and Amity towards the United States, and as some presage, of the voluntary reparation which it implied to be due. But the disavowal can be the less confounded with the reparation itself; since it was sufficiently required by the respect which Great Britain owed to her own honor; it being impossible that an enlightened Government, had hostility been meditated, would have commenced it in such a manner, and in the midst of existing professions of peace and friendship. She owed it also to consistency with the disavowal on a former occasion in which the pretensions had been enforced by a British Squadron against the sloop of War Baltimore belonging to the United States; and finally to the interest which Great Britain has more than any other nation in disclaiming a principle which would expose her superior number of ships of war, to so many indignities from inferior navies.\nAs little can the general assurances that reparation would be made, claim a return which could properly follow the actual reparation only. They cannot amount to more than a disposition, or at most a promise to do what the aggressor may deem a fulfilment of his obligation. They do not prove even a disposition to do what may be satisfactory to the injured party, who cannot have less than an equal right to decide on the sufficiency of the redress.\nIn dispatching a special Minister for the purpose of adjusting the difference, the U States ought cheerfully to acknowledge all the proof it affords on the part of His Britannic Majesty of his pacific views towards them, and of his respect for their friendship. But whilst they could not, under any circumstances, allow to the measure more than a certain participation in an honorable reparation, it is to be recollected that the avowed and primary object of the Mission was to substitute for the more extended adjustment proposed by the United States, at London a separation of the subjects as preferred by His Britannic Majesty, and you well know Sir, how fully this object was accomplished.\nWith respect to the personal conviction which you have expressed, that the terms which you decline to disclose would be satisfactory to the UStates, it is incumbent on me to observe that with the highest respect for your judgment and the most perfect confidence in your sincerity, an insuperable objection manifestly lies, to the acceptance of a personal and unexplained opinion in place of a disclosure which would enable this Government to exercise its own judgment in a case affecting so essentially its honor and its rights. Such a course of proceeding would be without example; and there can be no hazard in saying that one will never be afforded by a Government which respects itself as much as yours justly does; and therefore can never be reasonably expected from one which respects itself as much as this has a right to do.\nI forbear Sir, to enlarge on the intrinsic incongruity of the expedient proposed. But I must be allowed to remark as an additional admonition of the singular and mortifying perplexity in which a compliance might involve the President, that there are in the letter of Mr. Canning, communicating to Mr. Monroe the special mission to the UStates, pregnant indications that other questions, and conditions may have been contemplated which would be found utterly irreconcilable with the sentiments of this nation.\nIf neither any nor all of these considerations can sustain the preliminary demand made in your communication, it remains to be seen whether such a demand rests with greater advantage on the more precise ground on which you finally seem to place it.\nThe proclamation is considered as a hostile measure, and a discontinuance of it as due to the discontinuance of the aggression which led to it.\nIt has been sufficiently shewn that the proclamation, as appears on the face of it was produced by a train of occurrences terminating in the attack on the American frigate, and not by the last alone. To a demand therefore that the proclamation be revoked, it would be perfectly fair to oppose a demand that redress be first given for the numerous irregularities which preceded the aggression on the American frigate, as well as for this particular aggression, and that effectual controul be interposed against repetitions of them. And as no such redress has been given for the past notwithstanding the lapse of time which has taken place, nor any such security for the future, notwithstanding the undiminished reasonableness of it, it follows, that a continuance of the proclamation would be consistent with an entire discontinuance of one only of the occurrences from which it proceeded.\nBut it is not necessary to avail the argument of this view of the case, altho\u2019 of itself entirely conclusive. Had the proclamation been founded on the single aggression committed on the Chesapeake, and were it admitted that the discontinuance of that aggression merely, gave a claim to the discontinuance of the proclamation, the claim would be defeated, by the incontestable fact, that that aggression has not been discontinued. It has never ceased to exist; and is in existence at this moment. Need I remind you Sir, that the seizure and asportation of the Seamen belonging to the crew of the Chesapeake, entered into the very essence of that aggression; that with an exception of the victim to a trial forbidden by the most solemn considerations, and greatly aggravating the guilt of its author, the seamen in question are still retained, and consequently that the aggression, if in no other respect, is by that act alone continued and in force?\nIf the views which have been taken of the subject have the justness which they claim, they will have shewn that on no ground whatever can an annulment of the proclamation of July 2d. be reasonably required, as a preliminary to the negotiation with which you are charged. On the contrary it clearly results, from a recurrence to the causes and object of the Proclamation, that, as was at first intimated, the strongest sanctions of Great Britain herself, would support the demand, that previous to a discussion of the Proclamation, due satisfaction should be made to the U States; that this satisfaction ought to extend to all the wrongs which preceded and produced that act: and that even limiting the merits of the question to the single relation of the proclamation to the wrong committed in the attack on the American frigate, and deciding the question on the principle that a discontinuance of the latter required of right a discontinuance of the former, nothing appears that does not leave such a preliminary destitute of every foundation which could be assumed for it.\nWith a right to draw this conclusion the President might have instructed me to close this communication, with the reply stated in the beginning of it; and perhaps in taking this course, he would only have consulted a sensibility, to which most Governments would, in such a case, have yielded. But adhering to the moderation by which he has been invariably guided and anxious to rescue the two nations from the circumstances; under which an abortive issue to your Mission necessarily place them, he has authorized me, in the event of your disclosing the terms of reparation which you believe will be satisfactory and on its appearing that they are so, to consider this evidence of the Justice of His Britannic Majesty as a pledge for an effectual interposition with respect to all the abuses against a recurrence of which the Proclamation was meant to provide, and to proceed to concert with you, a revocation of that act bearing the same date with the act of reparation to which the U States are entitled.\nI am not unaware Sir, that according to the view which you appear to have taken of your instructions, such a course of proceeding has not been contemplated by them. It is possible, nevertheless, that an examination, in the spirit, in which I am well persuaded it will be made; may discover them to be not inflexible to a proposition, in so high a degree, liberal and conciliatory. In every event, the President will have manifested his willingness to meet your Government on a ground of accommodation, which spares to its feelings, however misapplied he may deem them, every concession, not essentially due to those which must be equally respected; and consequently will have demonstrated that the very ineligible posture given to so important a subject in the relations of the two Countries, by the unsuccessful termination of your mission, can be referred to no other source, than the rigorous restrictions under which it was to be executed.\nI make no apology Sir, for the long interval between the date of your letter and that under which I write. It is rendered unnecessary by your knowledge of the circumstances to which the delay is to be ascribed. With high consideration & respect I have the honor to be Sir, your most obt. Set.\n(signed) James Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2783", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Monroe, 5 March 1808\nFrom: Monroe, James\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nRichmond March 5, 1808.\nI have the pleasure to enclose you my letter on the subject of the treaty, in conformity with what passed between us when I was at Washington. I have had many other objects to attend to or I should have sent it to you much sooner. I have to repeat what I mentioned to you at Washington, that if there should be any remark in it which in the slightest degree departed from the friendship & respect I bear to the administration, which it was desird that I should modify, that I shall be happy to do it. To write any thing in vindication of my conduct is most distressing to me; but it was impossible to avoid it, after receiving your letter.\nI shall set out for Albemarle this afternoon & return here in a week or ten days. I have not yet been there & my affairs are suffering by my absence. Mrs. Monroe & our daughter desire their best regards to Mrs Madison & Mrs. Cutts. \nI am with best wishes for your welfare Dear Sir sincerely yours\nJas Monroe", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2784", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Sylvanus Bourne, 5 March 1808\nFrom: Bourne, Sylvanus\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nAmsterdam March 5 1808.\nI had the honor to write to you lately by the Ship Eliza Capt. Stuffington of & for Baltimore who took out with him, about one hundred destitute & distressed Seamen under a Special permission of the King, given to me of sending off a vessell for that purpose notwithstanding the embargo which has long had place here. Those men had gradually collected in this Port for some time past from all the Northern quarters of Europe, from Prisons in France & from Prisons in this Country, & from ships wrecked on this Coast & I thought it to be my duty to send them in this way to the U States, as they cost the publick from thirty to forty dollars daily. Capt. Stuffington contracted with me to take them passage free on Condition of my laying in provisions for them & furnishing them with Hammocks &c for their accommodation which I thought to be the best arrangment that could be made for the publick interest & in the Contract (of which I have sent two copies to the Collector of Baltimore with a request to transmit the same to you). I Stipulated that the Water Casks, any Surplus of Provisions that might be over, the Hammocks, Blankets Caboose &c &c Should be delivered over to said Collector for public uses as being public property, & I hope the whole thing will meet your approbation\nThis Letter goes by Capt Franklin in the Brig Susannah for Baltimore which by the desire of our Minister at Paris has obtained permission from the King to depart with dispatches of Consequence to the Govt. of the UStates.\nIt becomes my duty to mention to you for the information of our Govt. that this Govt. has discovered a disposition to alleviate as far as its political relations & the general Situation of affairs will admit the effects to which the Commerce here has been unavoidably subjected by the measures which France & this Govt. have found it necessary to adopt for bringing England to a Peace. indeed I think I can be justified in Saying that this Govt. will not be disposed to do any thing unfriendly towards our Country which it is not compelled to by extraneous influence It appears to have a due estimation of the reciprocal interests of the two Countries & to be anxious to preserve the relations of harmony & friendship which have so long subsisted between them, & in proof thereof it has of late at my express request modified some of its decrees so as to afford a material relief to our Vessells & Cargoes arriving here. How long it may retain the moral Capacity of fullfilling its views & wishes in this respect I am unable to say & am not without fearfull apprehensions that a conduct more untoward & unpropitious for our trade may be forced upon this Govt. from another quarter, while I hope that those fears may prove to be groundless.\nI send you herewith a letter recd. from the Secretary of State on the subject of a Claim of Mr. Tegelman against the State of South Carolina & I have to add that the Govt. here will take it in very friendly part if the President of the U States would use his influence with the Govt. of the State of S. C. towards bringing this affair to a just & proper conclusion.\nI have sent by this conveyance the two volumes of the French Leyden Gazettes for the last year & hope they may reach you safely. The dispatches carried by this Vessell will bring to you more correct information than any I can give of those events in Europe which are the most interesting to our Country.\nNew fields are opening for military action in Turkey, Sweden, Gibraltar &c. &c. Poor devoted Europe has yet long to Struggle before it can find a resting place. God grant that our Country may duly proffit of the Example which the fate of Europe affords & yet be able to avoid the horrors of war which have of late so Strongly threatened its Peace & tranquillity. With high respect I am Sir yr Ob Serv\nS Bourne\nPlease hand the enclosed private letter to the President.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2785", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Louis-Marie Turreau de Garambouville, 5 March 1808\nFrom: Turreau de Garambouville, Louis-Marie\nTo: Madison, James\nMonsieur,\nDes Fran\u00e7ais au nombre de 70. ou 80 desirant retourner en France, je vous prie de Solliciter de Monsieur Le Pr\u00e9sident la permission pour l\u2019exp\u00e9dition du Navire \"Arcturus,\" Command\u00e9 par le Capitaine Main, qu\u2019ils ont fr\u00eat\u00e9 condition\u00e8lement \u00e0 cet effet.\nIl y en a encore 30. ou 40. qui font leurs dispositions pour retourner dans les Colonies. Je vous Serais oblig\u00e9, Monsieur, de m\u2019informer Si je puis esp\u00e9rer que Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident voudrait bien m\u2019accorder aussi une autre permission pour le B\u00e2timent qu\u2019ils fr\u00eateraient. Agr\u00e9ez, Monsieur, une nouvelle assurance de me haute Consid\u00e9ration.\nTurreau", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-07-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2786", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Main, 7 March 1808\nFrom: Main, James\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nNewYork 7th. March 1808\nPerhaps it may be deemed presumption in a stranger to trouble you on a subject, in the event of which I have only a common interest with the rest of my fellow Citizens: I mean your election to the presidential chair. But from a devotion, for your talents & character I consider you the best fitted for the important trust of any other that has been proposed, & have taken every opportunity to echo, the wisdom of the selection by a majority of the members of Congress. But Sir, you are not apprised of the deep game, which the Clinton party are playing here.\nBy intrigue & slander, they have completely, subjugated this state, & Dewitt manages all its affairs in his own way. His hired libellers, are again set upon the scent, to defame; and you are the victim they wish to sacrifice, because you stand in the way of their overweening ambition. Local Prejudices, Revolutionary services are all brought into action, to distract the sober sense of the people. And unfortunately your friends, have not the privilege of a single press to counteract, the views of this virulent faction, or expose their motives to the people at large. I would therefore suggest the propriety of establishing a new daily paper, for the express purpose of vindicating the Government, and supporting the cause of our Country.\nFor I am certain no arts will be left untried, to have G Clinton elevated to the presidency, in order that he may become what for years he has been the stalking horse to his Nephews ambition.\nOn this subject, I have conversed with a number of the friends of the Administration, & I have no doubt, sufficient support can be obtained. I shall therefore enter into the spirit of the undertaking, & hope in a month, to be prepared to defend, truth & Virtue, against the shafts of calumny, & ambition. I shall be proud of your correspondence, And refer you to Morgan Lewis Esqr., Gurdon S Mumford Esqe. or S Mitchell LLD. for information with regard to character &c &c. Sir With sentiments of the highest Respect I have the honor to be Your Most Obt. & Mo: Hle. Servt.\nJames Main", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2787", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Robert Williams, 8 March 1808\nFrom: Williams, Robert\nTo: Madison, James\n(Copy.)\nSir,\nMississippi Territory Town of Washington March 8, 1808.\nOn the 1st. instant I dissolved the General Assembly. This power being possessed by the Governor, when in his opinion it may be thought expedient; I should not trouble you with any observations on the subject, were it not that I know, representations are and will be made tending to impeach my motives, as well as to question its propriety if not legality. It therefore becomes my official situation to inform you candidly and fully, the reasons which dictated the measure.\nThe present council was raised from a nomination, made by nine Representatives, two of whom were admitted and held their seats in consequence of the improper conduct of the Sheriff against two candidates who had a clear and considerable majority of the whole votes, That, that nomination when made, was so influenced by party that principle was totally disregarded. To such a pitch did that Assembly carry opposition, to each other, that it rose after a Session of near four months, without performing one of its most important and Constitutional duties, to wit, the appointment of a Delegate to Congress.\nMy being then here a Commissioner only afforded me complete access to a full understanding of the motives which influenced the members composing that Assembly, and I do declare that with a very few exceptions the whole nomination was with a view to embarrassment, opposition and disappointment to each other as parties.\nIt will be recollected that after I came into office as Governor I had to convene the General Assembly principally for the purpose of appointing a Delegate to Congress, and then threaten a dissolution before they would comply, That one of the least exceptional characters nominated died shortly after so that the Selection for a Council had to be made from nine instead of ten, that the Representation is now increased from nine to twelve members, the right of Suffrage extended nearly one half with an increased population in perhaps the same ratio. Hence I thought it sound policy to let an increased Representation upon an extention of Suffrage on an increased population have its full weight.\nI will, however, observe that this step has not been taken without due reflection by me, whether and how far a dissolution of the General Assembly terminates the Council, a body Commissioned by the President, and that the result of my deliberations have been and are that, the effects must be the same on all the branches of the Legislature. The Council as well as the House of Representatives are elected by the People though indirectly and the agency of the President in Commissioning I consider a part of the mode of Election. The terms of service of both Houses are fixed by the ordinance. The Commissions of the Council being revocable by the President can only be considered an additional check on that body, or any member of it; but does not, therefore render their tenure of Office more permanent or exempt from the provisions and conditions of the ordinance which gives the Governor the power to dissolve the General Assembly, thereby destroying the Legislative functions of each branch and suspending his own until an Assembly shall be again raised. The Governor has a character distinct from that of Legislation, but the Council have not. They together with the Governor and House of Representatives form the General Assembly which is the Subject of dissolution.\nThis being an important case and perhaps the first that has occurred under a Territorial Government, I shall not feel any chagrin should the opinion I have formed as to the effects of a dissolution on the Council be over-ruled, but shall be extremely mortified to know that the Government under which I live and with the administration of which I am charged should be so embarrassed as it must be with this Council.\nI do not believe that one third of the Citizens will vote at the next General Election if they have not a prospect of a new Council. At the last General Election and those to fill some vacancies during the past summer where there are six or seven hundred voters from 80 to 100 elected a member, knowing the character of the Council they would not turn out to the Election, consequently those of similar dispositions were Elected to the House of Representatives. Nothing more common than for the two Houses to pass bills, knowing them to be in violation of the ordinance and laws of Congress embracing popular objects in order that the Governor should be under the necessity of disapproving them, and thereby afford them grounds to clamour. To give you an example, They passed a bill apportioning the Representatives in part of the Territory, although they had previously memorialized Congress on the subject, which the present Session of Congress has acted on and granted. With such a Legislature it was impossible to get along as the public interest required and the correction would be but partial and in part by the next General election without a dissolution. For these reasons I am clearly of the opinion that if ever the power of dissolution ought to be exercised it was in the present instance.\nNo inconvenience can occur because the General Election takes place in July time enough for a Council to be nominated and appointed before the annual meeting of the General Assembly, and that Election I am satisfied will shew the sense of the people and as to this party that now embarrass &c.\nPlease favor me with your opinion as soon as convenient. With Sentiments of high Consideration I am Yrs.\n(Signed.) Robert Williams\nP.S. There are several members of the Council independent unprejudiced men, who I presume would and ought to be again nominated.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2789", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Francis Mercer, 8 March 1808\nFrom: Mercer, John Francis\nTo: Madison, James\nMy dear Sir\nWest River Mar 8th. 1808.\n I will not attempt to excuse my non-payment of a Debt which every honorable motive & feeling have urged me to settle for many years past. It is no excuse for me to say that I have permitted the obligations of justice & gratitude for your indulgence & forbearance to give way sometimes to the brutal importunities & frequently scandalous exactions of other Creditors. An anxiety however to make any explanation that may tend to alleviate the state of depression I must have sufferd in your estimation, has led me to state that when I sold out in Virginia with the determination of cancelling every demand against me, I had stipulated for the speedy payment of a sum that I beleiv\u2019d to be fully adequate to the purpose, & for the ballance, two thirds of the Amount, I gave an extensive credit, two years of which have not yet elapsed. I was not aware that I had miscalculated untill it was too late to rectify the error, or I should certainly have paid a Debt circumstanced as yours was in the first instance. On the contrary I sufferd the most importunate to be first satisfied, untill my resources were exhausted. It is true that I permitted myself to launch into an expence, that was unjustifiable when I was in, for the education of five Children, three of my own, & two orphan nephews left wholly dependent on me & what was still more inexcusable my wounded pride or rather vanity was piqued into the acceptance of an office, which at an earlier period I had held in contempt, & which I well knew had intailed inextricable difficulties on all who had meddled with it, but I really did not foresee that I shoud again be involved in pecuniary distresses that woud lead me to commit such an act of injustice as I have been guilty of towards you, & indeed you alone, for except a trifling balance of 2 or 300 dollars Still due Mr. Coxe (as indulgent in his nature as yourself) All my numerous creditors however connected with me have exacted payment without Scruple or delay. From time to time I have promised myself from Crops or other resources to remit to you the whole ballance that I owe you, untill the embargo ended my delusion & convinced me that my only mode of payment woud be to remit such Sums as I might at any time be able to collect. My Nephew Landon Mercer, having enterd the naval Service of the United States, is the bearer of this. I coud not permit him to go to Washington, untill I coud send the inclos\u2019d $300, which is all that my present circumstances will admit of. The Ballance shall follow as soon as I am able to sell my Tobacco, or collect a large Sum due me for Interest.\nHaving named to you my Nephew, I must express my feelings for this poor Child turnd adrift in the World, & exposed to the hazards of a dangerous profession at so early an age. I coud have & wishd him a safer destination but all that I can do I have done for him. I have confin\u2019d myself to the strictest retirement & subjected myself to privations I had not been accustomed to, in order to provide the means of education for five Children of whom he is the youngest, but those means always inadequate are now nearly exhausted, & they must Seek their fortunes with the advantages I have given them. This Boy I have great hopes of he is uncommonly thoughtful & prudent for his years -- his genius for all mathematical science is extraordinary, his resolution absolutely not to be daunted, & his disposition mild, correct & amiable -- with these Qualities he may one day prove an honor to his Country & friends. If in the course of events he may at any time merit your attention or patronage, I still flatter myself, that it will be no disadvantage to him that it fell to my lot to supply the place to him of his unfortunate father.\nI mingle very little with the political World & to intrude my opinions may only embarrass. Yet it woud be disingenuous in me, feeling as I do, not to notice the collision that seems to impend between the two Individuals in public life, for whose honor happiness & prosperity I am most interested, a Collision which if persisted in must in my judgment eventuate in the elevation of a third person, & that possibly connected with a removal of the Seat of Government. To the friend of my early youth I coud express myself still more freely & I did not hesitate to deprecate a contest that promis\u2019d no good to either & might possibly deprive both of the greatest Consolation of the evening of life, an unreserv\u2019d & confidential friendship. I did venture to suggest a remedy by which I thought the interest of our Country woud be every way promoted. If we shoud be compelled amid the confusion that universally prevails among those who call themselves the Civilizd World, to take Arms to defend ourselves, I cannot beleive that we shall limit ourselves to inadequate means or trust to untried experiments in contradiction to the uniform experience of Mankind. A few Skeleton-Regiments without an head, may fire a funeral Volley over the independence of their Country, but woud not be felt in its defence in an age prolific in military heroism & amidst a World exercis\u2019d in Arms. I shoud as soon think of requiring animal functions from the human body after the operation of the Guillotine as energy from an Army depriv\u2019d of a Commander in Chief, & Yet I feel that a Commander in Chief shoud not only command a general confidence of the States, but deserve it by military endowment & experience; that he shoud be of unblemished integrity & above all of an undoubted attachment to our Civil Institutions. I can recollect at this moment but One man in America that in any degree answers this description & his appointment I shoud suppose woud remove the embarrassment I allude to. You\u2019ll excuse this obtrusion of Opinions which require no reply nor notice but as they may possibly have weight. That you may long enjoy every honor & happiness that this life can bestow is the wish of Dr. Sir Yr. sincere friend & Servt.\nJohn Fr: Mercer", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2790", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Valentin de Foronda, 8 March 1808\nFrom: Foronda, Valentin de\nTo: Madison, James\nMuy Se\u0148or mio:\nPhiladelphia 8. de Marzo de 1808.\nEspero que V. S. tendr\u00e1 la bondad de dar mil gracias de mi parte a su Excella. el Se\u0148or Presidente por sus deseos de complacer \u00e0 los Espa\u0148oles, relativamente \u00e0 proporcionarles el Regreso a su Patria, que haya lugar \u00e1 su pretension; lo que les he hecho presente, advirtiendoles que no me encargar\u00e9 de pasar a las manos de V. S. su solicitud, \u00e1 menos de que haya seis u ocho sujetos con los pasaportes correspondientes, y que no den todas las seguridades posibles de que la solicitud alguna operacion mercantil, pues jamas abrigar\u00e9 enga\u0148os, supercherias, dolos ni cosa ninguna que no se concil\u00e1 con los principios de franqueza, de candor, que me tiene impuestos mi Rey, y que me inspira mi corazon y entiendimiento.\nV. S. notaria en mi carta del 10. de Febrero, que no pretendia de ninguno modo de interrump a las Leyes, pues decia \"V. S. ver\u00e1 si la pretension es arreglada \u00e1 los principios adoptados por \u00e8ste Gobierno.\"\nEste mismo lenguage, Cavallero Madison ser\u00e1 siempre el mio. La conservacion de la buena Armonia con estos Estados es el deseo de mi Soberano, y fue el objeto que me propuse desde que tube la honra de ser nombrado por Encargado de Negocios, y persuadido \u00e0 que las armas de la Logica son las unicas que gustan a su Excella. el Se\u0148or Presidente y al Exmo. Se\u0148or Dn. Pedro Cevallos, procurar\u00e9 no emplear otras. El modo de ver de los hombres es diferente: tal vez no convendremos en varios puntos, mas n\u00f3 por eso dexare de proponer mis ideas. Dios gue. \u00e0 V. S. Ms. as. B L M de V S su mas atento servidor\nValentin de Foronda", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2791", "content": "Title: From James Madison to William Pinkney, 8 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Pinkney, William\nSir,\nDepartment of State March 8th. 1808\nHaving just learnt that the present Mail will arrive at New York in time for the British packet, I avail myself of the opportunity of forwarding your Commission and letters of credence, as successor to Mr Monroe, in the Legation at London.\nSince my last which went by Mr Nourse in a dispatch vessel bound first to L\u2019Orient and then to Falmouth, I have received your communications of the 23 Novr & of Decr. These with a representation from Genl Armstrong to the French Government on the subject of the Decree of Berlin as expounded and enforced in the case of the ship Horizon, were thought by the President to throw so much light on the course likely to be pursued by Great Britain and France in relation to the United States, that he had the documents confidentially laid before Congress. By an inadvertence, the documents were read in the Senate with unshut doors; and one of the family of Mr Rose being, as is said, present, it is not improbable that your statement of the conversations with Mr. Canning will be reported to him, and possibly with such errors, as are incident to that mode of obtaining information. I mention this circumstance, that in case you should perceive any misimpressions to have been made, you may take occasion to correct them.\nThe Embargo continues to take deeper root in the public sentiment, and in the measures of Congress. Several supplemental acts for enforcing it have passed, and another is on its passage, for the same purpose. The modifications of the British orders, admitting a trade with her enemies in her own behalf, and subjecting neutrals to special licenses and to tribute, prove that retaliation is a cover for usurpation and monopoly and awaken feelings, sometimes stronger than interest itself, in stimulating perseverance in a remedial system.\nMr. Erskine has made a written communication on the subject of the British orders. I shall answer him as soon as the urgent business on hand will permit.\nMr. Rose will probably return in a short time, the Frigate in which he came being kept in waiting for him. His mission has not been successful; except in obtaining a separation of the general subject of impressments from the case of the Chesapeake. The way being opened to him, by an acquiescence of the President in the mode of discussing the latter, insisted on by the British Government, Mr Rose disclosed the preliminary, categorically required by his instructions, that the proclamation of July should be annulled, as the only condition on which he could \"enter upon any negotiation for the adjustment with which he was charged.\" After various informal conferences and experiments, which did not lessen the apprehension from passages in Mr Cannings letter to Mr. Monroe (interpreted as the passage relating to the proclamation was interpreted by the preliminary) that if this difficulty at the threshold could have been parried, others of an insuperable nature would have grown out of the negotiation itself, the business has been put into the form of a regular correspondence: My answer to Mr Rose\u2019s first communication was sent to him, on the fifth instant. As soon as his reply is received, it is probable that the whole will be laid before Congress. And as Mr Rose will, it is understood, depart immediately after the correspondence is closed, I shall have an opportunity by him of transmitting to you copies of it. In the mean time I can only observe that the operative impressions to be made on Congress by the correspondence will necessarily depend much on the tenor and tone of Mr Rose\u2019s concluding letter, which will probably be pacific and even conciliatory. With sentiments of high respect &c\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2792", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Augustus Woodward, 8 March 1808\nFrom: Woodward, Augustus\nTo: Madison, James\nRiver Raisin, Mar. 8. 1808.\nThree circumstances that may not be entirely unimportant, two of which have a tendency to shew the views of Bonapart\u00e9 relative to our country, and the other may hereafter confirm them, have lately come to my knowledge.\nThey arrive through a channel from which, at first view, they would be little expected; that is the Indians of this quarter, and other parts of the country.\nThe first relates to a savage visit from this quarter to his court. An Indian Chief, from one of those caprices which sometimes enter into the savage mind; penetrated, as he expressed himself, with an irresistible desire of seeing again, after a long cessation of intercourse, his French Father; sometime ago conceived, and executed, the project of a journey to Paris. He has since returned. During his stay at Paris he was admitted to an interview with Bonapart\u00e9. His representation of his impressions, and of what passed on the occasion; the observations he made relative to the Americans, and the replies he received; with the significant mode, which Bonapart\u00e9 is said to have taken, to explain his idea with respect to the future fate of the Americans; to those who are acquainted with the nature of the savage mind, and can at the same time make some estimate, of the extraordinary character who has had such an astonishing career in France, will perhaps not appear either unnatural or incredible.\nAnother Chief, unconnected, with the former, some time since passed through this Territory; charged with dispatches to the agents of the British Government, at Fort Amherstburgh. His discourse to the Canadians, under an imaginary impression of its being confidential, was not a little Surprizing, considered merely as the emanation of a savage mind; and though the facts he alluded to, with respect to the state of European affairs, were by no means correct, they still tend to shew that some extraordinary and unusual impressions have been attempted on the Indian mind, from a civilized quarter. I can only account for his remarks by supposing them to have their true origin to the southward, among the Spaniards.\nThe third circumstance relates to a second projected visit of some of the Indian Chiefs of this quarter, with some of the French gentlemen of this Territory, to the Court of Bonapart\u00e9. Although pecuniary motives would seem to have originated it, I have very little doubt that, if it should take place, it will be connected to some political purpose; which, if not injurious to the United States, it will be at least useful to the government to have information of.\nAs it is purposed to pass through the United States, I will give an early intimation of it, if it should be about to take place while I am here; and, if my situation should be any way changed, I will take care to designate to the government a channel, through which sincere and seasonable information will be supplied.\nI deem it the more a duty to be the means of communicating this information to the Executive, as it is entirely unknown to any other of the officers of government here. The population of this Territory, with the exception of the Town, and the Garrisons, being almost exclusively French, and the intercourse of the heart seldom passing through the medium of interpreters, the Governor of the Territory, as well as the Secretary, are sometimes cut off from information, which might be interesting; as the Governor has experienced, much to his cost, in his various transactions with the Canadians. Those two gentlemen excepted, no other civil officer of responsibility is at present in the Territory but myself; and though my station is not such as to authorize a direct correspondence with the Executive on political affairs, I have always conceived it allowable, in the character of a private citizen, to be the channel of conveying any facts, or even Sentiments, which might appear worthy of a temporary attention; at no time relaxing in an unqualified support of the measures directed by competent authority, either at the seat of the general government, or here, whether they might correspond with my individual opinions, or not.\nThe high and Serious dissensions, also, which subsist between the two first officers of our government; and which I have no doubt will at first appear very perplexing to the mind of the General Executive; seem to present almost insuperable barriers to society and confidence. I have found it an embarrassing, and almost an impossible task, to avoid the enmity of their respective adherents; according as I happen to be successively suspected of favoring the one or the other. The only mode I could adopt was to avoid, as far as practicable, particular intercourse with both. For sixteen months past I have had no intercourse whatever with the Secretary, and for about eight months none with the Governor. While I condemn, in the most unequivocal manner, the malice which the Secretary bears toward the Governor, and the low intrigues to which he has resorted to injure him, and collaterally all who have entertained the least friendship for him; I am at the same time very Sensible of a number of important indiscretions in the Governor\u2019s conduct. I say indiscretions; because if I thought there was more than indiscretions, I would not hesitate to say So, either to the General Executive, or to the public. I presume however that as far as the General Executive deem it important to have minute information as to facts, they are already supplied, in a more correct and impartial shape than it would be in my power to place them. (The French inhabitants, who though they may be sometimes uninformed, are not generally ill-disposed, relish but little either of the disputants. In a catholic country, where there is not one protestant minister, or one protestant religious society, of any denomination, a protestant minister, particularly of the eastern manners, even though his character were adorned with all the virtues appropriate to his profession, is not naturally the most acceptable. Indeed to the people of this country, as well others, as the French, the eastern habits are the least respected. The British gentlemen have always indulged a sort of contemptuous, and unjustifiable hatred of them; and, when displeased, the term \"yankee\" is one of the most virulent epithets which they conceive they can apply. The French do not use this term, though they entertain the same idea; and perhaps with still greater force. They have another term, which answers them the same purpose. It is the term \"Bostonnois\", which they pronounce \"Bastonnois.\" \"Sacr\u00e9 Bastonnois\", or \"sacr\u00e9 cochon de Bastonnois\", is their most virulent term of abuse, when they are displeased with an American; or, with a person from the Eastern states particularly. It is however unfortunately true, that, among the French inhabitants, the Secretary is much better esteemed than the Governor.)\nAs I presume the government are at this time entirely occupied with the British negociations, and other matters of primary consequence; and the matters to which I have alluded are not such as would produce the least change in any part of its immediate conduct; and some of those details, which can alone enable a just estimate to be made of either the credibility or value of what is stated, I have yet to collect; I shall defer, for some time, a second communication on the subject. In order, in some measure, to prevent it from transpiring, at a more early period than the government might desire, I shall probably either transmit it in French, trusting that a few errors in the use of a foreign language will be overlooked, or in a cypher, or by some conveyance more special than usual. My reason for giving notice of it, in a preliminary letter, is, that I shall be obliged to shew my second communication to some persons, in order to be ascertained That the information is correct on the two first points; and to those persons it ought not to be known that I have said any thing to the government on the subject of the third. I have the honor to be, Sir, with the highest respect, your obedient servant,\nA. B. Woodward", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2793", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Stackpole, 8 March 1808\nFrom: Stackpole, William\nTo: Madison, James\nNewYork March 8. 1808\nUnder the necessity of proceeding from hence directly to Boston, the place of my residence, I avail myself of the first moment of my arrival, agreeably to the desire of his Excellency Mr. Pinckney, Minister at the Court of St. James, to transmit to Your Excellency, by mail, the dispatches (Nos. 1 to 6 inclusive,) with which that gentleman has honoured me.\nI regret exceedingly that the circumstance of the ship, in which I took passage, having sprung a leak, so as to render it necessary to stop at Fayal inorder to repair, has kept them back so much longer than had been anticipated. I hope, & trust, that no additional accident will intervene to prevent their duly coming to hand.\nAs the Consul at Fayal, Mr. Dabney, owing to the sickness of his family, was unable to communicate to Your Excellency the change, which have recently occurred at the Azores; and, as it is presumed that no political event, at this crisis, however it may be unimportant in comparison with those which have, latterly, succeeded each other so rapidly on the continent of Europe, is wholly without interest, I take the liberty to inform your Excellency that when I left Fayal (Jany. 30) the Azores were considered to be under the direction and entire control of the English, though they had not actually taken formal possession of them.\nAbout a week previously an English line of battle-ship, the Elizabeth, appeared off there, & landed a Mr. Purvis with a letter from the Captain (Curzon) to the British Consul, accompanied by others from the Govr. Genl. of the Islands, at Tercera, where she had previously touched, to the Sub. Governor. The Consul; whose letter I saw, was requested \"to deliver those addressed to the Sub-Governor, without delay, as they related to the conduct to be observed by the people of the Islands towards the English & their enemies, in consequence of orders from Sir Sydney Smith,\" from whose squadron the ship was dispatched.\nA considerable fleet, has been frequently seen off the Azores since the Elizabeth passed. As they are considered to be the natural granary, not only for Lisbon but Madeira, which is occupied by two thousand British troops, it is supposed to have on board the residue of the five thousand which were sent there, and that they are destined to be landed on the three principal Islands; (Tercera, St. Michaels and Fayal) if, upon examination, they be found sufficiently important to warrant the expence which must annually be incurred for their maintenance.\nIt is not attempted to veil the authority of the English. Indeed it was observed by the Governor that a particular arrangement, of which we were speaking, was by the direction of Sir Sydney Smith. The French and Spanish Consuls, on the day after the arrival of Mr. Purvis, were obliged, each, formally, to surrender his exequatur. Being Portuguese they are allowed to continue in Fayal on their engaging no longer to consider themselves representatives or agents of France or Spain.\nMr. Purvis, from the first moment of his landing until I came away, was occupied in obtaining information of the population, produce, soil, military establishments &c of the different Islands; but especially in ascertaining, as there is no good harbour at any of them, if a bason can be formed at Fayal, and what the necessary works would probably cost. It is already decided upon to establish a hospital for the English marine at Tercera or Fayal. In all likelihood a preference will be given to the latter place.\nIt is the opinion of many at Fayal, and particularly of the British Consul, that these Islands, as well as Madeira, have been ceded to the English by the Prince of Portugal as a compensation for their assistance when he was leaving the continent for Brazil.\nI beg leave to observe that Mr. Dabney desired I would mention to Your Excellency the distressed situation of his family from sickness, as an apology, which he hopes will be received, for not writing. I pray your Excellency to accept the assurances of the respectful consideration & esteem, with which I have the honour to be, Your Excellency\u2019s most obedient & hum Servant\nWm. Stackpole", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2794", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Adams & Loughery, 9 March 1808\nFrom: Adams & Loughery\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nPhiladelphia 9th. March, 1808\nWe take the liberty to enclose you a copy of a letter, received from our friends Messrs. Ruys & Zimmerman at Amsterdam, respecting our Ship James Adams, Captain Bangs, which vessel left our capes the 8th. November last, bound for Amsterdam, with a cargo of colonial produce, all american property, accompanied with the proper and usual Certificates of neutrality, as well as those of importation all in Conformity to the known laws of France & England at that time, and Certified by the Dutch Consul, which was the only precaution we could make use of, and such as all vessels heretofore had been furnished with bound that way; our object in making you this communication, is that you may perceive how we are likely to be effected by the French decrees & British orders of Council, as never was there a Ship sailed with every matter more clear, than the James Adams did from this port; Should you consider this an improper liberty, we beg you to be assured, that our object is only for the good of our Country and as Citizens feels deeply interested in all its Concerns. With great respect & consideration your very Obt. Hble Serts\nAdams & Loughery", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2795", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Valentin de Foronda, 9 March 1808\nFrom: Foronda, Valentin de\nTo: Madison, James\nMuy Se\u0148or mio:\nPhilada. 9. de Marzo de 1808.\nTengo la honra de poner en noticia de V.S. que necesito enviar unos ocho m\u00edl barr\u00edles de Harina \u00e1 la Isla de Puerto Rico, manteca y carne lo que no se puede verificar por razon del embargo. Como la causa de este es el que no sufran las propriedades de estos Estados por las presas que pueden hacer en ellas las Potencias Europeas en virtud de sus Leyes de Bloqueos; Yo salvo \u00e8ste inconveniente pues si se pierden, el Gobierno Espa\u0148ol es el que tendr\u00e1 que sufrir la perdida del Buque y de sus efetos: asi lexos de perder los Estados Unidos ganaran en el equivalente que les dar\u00e9 por un Barco que les \u00e8s inutil, mientras dure el embargo, y beneficio \u00e1 los Labradores, comprandoles lo que se les pudriria por falta de su salida.\nAsi espero de la Justicia de \u00e8ste Gobierno, que dar\u00e1 \u00e1 la Espa\u0148a \u00e8sta se\u0148al de amistad, mayormente quando Resuelta en favor de los Labradores de estos Estados, la concesion de mi solicitud.\nTenga V.S. \u00e1 bien contextarme lo antes que sea posible, y yo pedire \u00e1 Dios gue. su vida ms. as. B. L. M. de VS su mas atento servidor\nValentin de Foronda", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2797", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Tobias Lear, 9 March 1808\nFrom: Lear, Tobias\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nAlgiers, March 9th: 1808.\nSince I had the honor of addressing you on the 4th. of January, nothing new has occurred here relative to our affairs. After the departure of the Courier for Alicante, on the 8. of January, we have not had an arrival from Europe in this port, nor the departure of a Vessel, excepting a few of the Country going coastways. And from, or of the United States, I have not heard anything, since your letter of the 14th. of July. I am also without any advice from Tunis or Tripoli. Indeed, we seem, at this place, to be shut out from an intercourse with the world.\nThey are preparing here a Camp of about 6000 Turks to go against Tunis. These, they say, will be joined by a large body of Arabs at Constantine, with which force they threaten to conquer the City and Kingdom of Tunis. But, I presume the Tunisians will not be idle on their part.\nIn my letter of the 4th. of January, I mentioned the Report that the French disputes with this Regency, were in a train of settlement; but, as I then predicted, they were not so easy to settle; for the conferences, which continued about a month, terminated in a resolution of the French Consul to leave the Regency, for which purpose he had engaged a Vessel, and had everything prepared for his departure, with his family, and all those of his nation, who were free; when a French Corvette came off here on the 20th. of february, at the moment he was about to put his effects on board the Vessel which he had chartered. The Consul went on board her, where he remained two days; after which she came to anchor, received & returned the usual Salute. When the Consul came on shore, he notified all his Countrymen to be prepared to embark on board the Corvette the next morning: but it was found she had left the Bay in the night, on the appearance of bad weather, which came on very severely the day following. After the Gale, the Corvette appeared off the Bay, two days successively; but had no communication. Since that she has not been seen; and it is presumed she has returned to France with no very favorable intelligence.\nFrom that time to the present, the negociations have been going on again; and yesterday they terminated in the Dey\u2019s consenting to release 106 Slaves claimed by the French Consul, consisting of French, Genoise & Corsicans, who have been captured within a year past. Among them is the Negro, whom I mentioned in my letter of the 31. of december, as he was taken, while belonging to the Privateer in which he had entered, and was considered as a Frenchman. These people depart tomorrow for Marseilles, in a Vessel which the Consul has chartered for that purpose; and by which I send this, under cover to Mr. Cathalan, our Consul there, together with Copies of my dispatches of the 8. of November, 31. of December & 4th of January; hoping that some occasion may offer to transmit them safely from thence to the U. States.\nThe day before the Gale, which caused the French Corvette to leave the Bay, the new Frigate of this place, of 48 Guns, commanded by the famous Rais Homida, sailed on a Cruize. She lost all her masts in the Gale, and was saved from going on shore, in the most extraordinary manner, by falling into a Bay, or Roadstead, just to the East of Cape Metafous, and was afterwards towed in here a mere wreck. They have not a mast at the Marine to replace those lost, unless they take them from some other Vessel. All their Cruizers are now in port, excepting a Polacre & a Xebeck, which sailed about a week ago for Bona, with military stores, to renew their war against Tunis.\nI have the honor to enclose a Schedule of my account of receipts and payments of Cash, on account of the U. States, from August 1803 to December 31st. 1807, and also a statement of our accounts with the Regency of Algiers. My accounts are made out in full, and ready, to be transmitted; but they, with the documents accompanying them, are too bulkey to go by the present occasion and especially as the conveyance is very uncertain. The Schedule will, however, give a full and correct view of them. The accounts of Dr. Dodge, and those after his death, in Tunis, will accompany my accounts. There was due to him, on the settlements of his Account, on the 17th. of August 1806, a balance of $ 1287.35 Cents.\nIt is necessary for me always to have some funds either in Leghorn, or Malta; or both; for the facility of furnishing the necessary calls from Tunis and Tripoli, as well as for this place. The mode of obtaining money there by negociating Bills on the U. States, seems to me the most simple and convenient; if it could always be done without too great a sacrifice. Should it be thought best to adopt some other mode, you will have the goodness to point it out to me.\nI have heard nothing of the Bill which Mr. Davis informed me, in October last, he had drawn upon me for $5000. And have heard nothing since from that Gentleman.\nI still reserve in my hands the Certificate, or Tiscara, as it is called, of the balance of 8.798 Sequins in favor of the U. States, on the settlement for the Cargo January 1806. This I could have given as a part payment of the two Annuities due on the 5th. of March 1807. But I thought it best to hold it towards the payment due on the 5. of March 1808, as it is more valuable than Cash, in making payments to the Regency.\nThe Release of these Slaves (which however cost either the Hebrews, who have great riches in france, or the french, 50,000 Dollars, in presents to the great men) will probably release those people from one fear, and they must break (with) some other nation; and I shall not be at ease until we have a force in this Sea to guard our commerce. My hopes are that the Emperor will not be disposed to let these people be quiet; notwithstanding present concession, particularly on the ground it has been obtained. I pray you to accept assurances of the high respect, and sincere attachment, with which I have the honor to be, Sir, Your most faithful & Obliged Sert\nTobias Lear", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-09-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2799", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Josiah, III Quincy, 9 March 1808\nFrom: Quincy, Josiah, III\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nCommittee Room, 9th. March, 1808.\nIn reply to your inquiry, contained in Mr. Graham\u2019s letter of the 29th ult. I am instructed by the Committee, to whom were referred the messages of the President of the United States of the 9th. and 15th. of February, relative to the rupture and to the amicable settlement with the Dey of Algiers, to state, that, notwithstanding \"the late information from Algiers,\" they are desirous of the statements requested in my former letter.\nThey have also instructed me to request that, in addition to the information sought by that letter, you would communicate the causes which occasioned the omission, for two years, of the payments of the annuities to the Dey; the amount of the offers of cash mentioned in Mr. Lear\u2019s letter to Mr. Kirkpatrick; and when they were made; the sum finally accepted by the Dey in lieu of the stipulated maritime stores; when the remittances, which enabled Mr. Lear to make the Cash payments, were made; whether the arrangements, with the Dey as to the cash liquidation, extend to future annuities; and what are the advantages accruing to the United States by payments in cash, instead of maritime stores.\nThe committee are also desirous to be informed whether any legislative interposition be necessary to secure hereafter punctual performance of the Treaty stipulations with that regency. I am, Sir very respectfully your hbl Servt.\nJosiah Quincy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2801", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Cowles Meade, 10 March 1808\nFrom: Cowles Meade\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nWashington, M. T. March 10th. 1808.\nWhen I sent on my accounts for disbursements made about the expedition against Aaron Burr, I charged the department of War for the Horse which I purchased for the use of Mr Chew. It seems that I made a charge against an improper office. I was instructed by the accountant to exhibit the same against the department of which you have superintendence. Accordingly I enclose the same voucher, which I solicit you to provide for in the settlement of my accounts I have the Honor to be Yr. Vy. Hble. Servt.\nCowles Mead", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-10-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2803", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Syng Dorsey, 10 March 1808\nFrom: Dorsey, John Syng\nTo: Madison, James\nDr. Sir\nSenate Chamber Lancaster March 10th. 1808.\nBelieving it may be well to inform the President of the United States of the proceedings and animadversions of the Legislature of this State on the Subject of the United States road from Cumberland to the Ohio, I ask the favor of your medium\nThe extraordinary Resolution of Mr. Espy in the HR which you may have seen, and its unexpected Support was in the course of discussion finally brought to a temperate statement, \"that it was essential to the interests of this Commonwealth\" that the \"Road should pass by a certain variant rout.\nWhen the Subject was brought before Senate the indecorousness of addressing the President of the United States on an occasion where a recent law of our own had given him unlimited authority and of course placed any controul out of the reach of State interference was urged, the general principle of minor (not to say minute) inconvenience yielding to the general good appeared also to have weight and finally obtained, and the Resolution negatived, next morning however a reconsideration was moved and lost, so that I trust there will be no farther difficulty\nI promised Mr. Moore, one of the Commissioners, this information, but not exactly recollecting his address, must count on your goodness.\nOur excellent friend Mr. Thomas Leiper was here a few days at the Convention for forming a ticket for President and Vice president of the United States and Governor of the State. I mentioned that I should have occasion to write you -- he requested his usual remembrance and that of Mrs. Leiper to Mrs. Madison also to Mr. Duval\nIn a few days the Report of a Committee of Senate to which is annexed a Bill on the Subject of Weights and Measures, will be printed which if approved may lead to some adoption of the UStates. I shall therefore as first named of the Committee forward you Copy. with perfect Respect and esteem\nJ: Dorsey", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-11-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2804", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Paolo, Count Andreani, 11 March 1808\nFrom: Andreani, Paolo, Count\nTo: Madison, James\nMon cher Monsieur!\nNew Orleans ce 11. Mars 1808.\nJe saisi avec empressement l\u2019occasion du depart pour Washington de m\u00f4n ami le Docteur Pendergrast pour renouveler avec Vous, mon Ch\u00e8r Monsieur des liasson que les \u00e9venements politiques d\u2019Europe ont interrompu\u00eb pour un longue Suite d\u2019ann\u00e9es. Le Docteur Pendergrast est un jeun homme de beaucoup de moyens, & tr\u00e8s-instruit de la situation politique de ce pays; & comme je m\u2019interesse fortement a lui, permeter moi de Vous prier de l\u2019accueillir avec bienveillence, & de lui \u00e9tre utile dans ces vu\u00ebs.\nDepuis bien des ann\u00e9es j\u2019avois form\u00e9 le projet de passer de nouveau en Amerique, & en r\u00e9montent le Mississippi & le Missouri completer de la sorte m\u00f4n premier plan. Les evenements malheureux qui ont troubl\u00e9 la paix de m\u00f4n pays m\u2019ont \u00e9mpech\u00e8 de l\u2019executer avant la fin de l\u2019ann\u00e9e 1806; & lorsqu\u2019il me fut permis de m\u2019embarquer j\u2019eus a surmonter une Suite des contrarietes. D abord le navire fut d\u00e9tenue & conduit a la Jamaique, & quelques jours apr\u00e8s avoir debarqu\u00e8 dans cette Ville, j\u2019ai \u00e9t\u00e9 Saisi par la p\u00e9tite verole, maladie \u00e9xtremement dangereuse \u00e1 m\u00f4n age, & que conjointement \u00e1 la goutte \u00e0 caus\u00e9 la perte presque totale de l\u2019usage d\u2019un pied. Dans cette malheureuse situasion, il ne me reste desormais autre \u00e9sperence que les eaux Thermales; & c\u2019est a ce fin que je compte de m\u2019\u00e9mbarquer dans six Semaines pour Philadelphie pour consulter le Dr. Rush \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard du choix entre les Eaux de l\u2019Etat de New York ou de la Virginie. Le voyage me procurera l\u2019avantage d\u2019observer de mes yeux le progr\u00e8 presque merveilleux de V\u00f4tre pays: & de r\u00e9voir des anciens amis qui m\u2019ont combl\u00e8 d\u2019h\u00f4nnetetes pendant m\u00f4n S\u00e9jour, & dont l\u2019estime m\u2019est bien ch\u00e8r.\nVeuillez, aussi presenter mes respecteux compliments au President des E. U., & Lui dire que Si l\u2019usage des bains me rendra la Sant\u00e8, j\u2019aurois l\u2019h\u00f4nneur de voir avant la fin de l\u2019ann\u00e9e; & que je me flatte de pouvoir Lui faire un tableau assez interessent de la situation de ce pays, qu\u2019un longue Sejour m\u2019a mis \u00e1 m\u00eame d\u2019etudier; & n\u2019ayant eu aucune liaisons ni politique ni commerciale avec qui que ce soit, j\u2019ai put juger avec impartialit\u00e9. En attendent, Monsieur, agreez l\u2019assurance de m\u00f4n attachement, & de l\u2019estime sincere avec laquelle j\u2019ai l\u2019h\u00f4nneur d\u2019\u00e9tre Monsieur Ve. tr\u00e8s humble & Obbt. Servt.\nAndreani", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-11-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2805", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 11 March 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\nDr. Sir.\nLondon. March. 11. 1808.\nNothing of any Moment has occurred here since my last. The Bill for carrying into Execution the orders of Council will probably pass the Commons in a Day or two, after much opposition. It will go tardily through the House of Lords, where the orders have been repeatedly attacked with great Power. I was present a few Nights since when Lord Erskine moved a Sett of Resolutions on the Subject. His Speech was very able, as was that of Lord Grenville. There seems to be a pretty general opinion that before the Bill passes the Temper & future Course of our Government should be understood. The Opposition have prophesied the worst on that Head, and, if they had Fact instead of mere Conjecture to rest upon, believe that they wd. be much stronger in Argument. Ministers, on the contrary, hope, or affect to hope, for acquiescence at the least from the U. S.; and, while they deprecate, in common with the whole Nation, War or the continued Interruption of Intercourse with us, profess their, Confidence that the Orders in Council cannot produce either of these Effects. If it shd. turn out that we are disposed to acquiesce, their Difficulties on the mere Score of the orders are of course at an End; but if we oppose, & take an Attitude against them, or preserve that which we have already taken, they must I think ultimately yield; and would consequently consult their Prudence in avoiding to precipitate their Bill at present.\nThe orders appear to be still popular throughout the Kingdom. Something of their Popularity is to be ascribed to an Expectation that we shall take them in good part, and something to an Expectation that they will produce a speedy Effect upon France. France can however at all Times relieve herself from their Pressure without making the State of Things more favorable for G. B. than when the orders were first issued. Their Distress here wd. be extreme if they shd. be deceived in these Expectations.\nI saw a Letter yesterday from a Well informed Man in Birmingham which states that War with the U. S. will throw out of Employment, & deprive of Bread, 150.000 Persons in that Town, & within 14 Miles round. Yet the Writer who is deeply interested in the American Trade & is the Creditor of our People to an immense Amount, disapproves of the Liverpool Petition, and thinks that the orders ought now to be persisted in. A similar Letter from Bristol was shewn to me. The Writer states confidently that the Sense of that Town is against the Liverpool Petition; and, while he admits that if the orders in Council shd. produce War with America they wd. justly be considered as a most calamitous Measure, he thinks that they should not now be retracted. The Country would be humiliated by such a Step! And the U. S. will probably feel that the Necessity which produced the orders ought to induce them to submit to them. Such are the Speculations which characterize these extraordinary Times.\nThe Liverpool Petitioners will be heard in the House of Commons, by their Counsel, on Thursday next, probably after that House has passed the Bill. They will at least disclose some valuable Facts.\nI have been told that the last Wheat-Crop in England & Scotland was better than I had supposed it, much more than an Average Crop. But the other Crops have failed as I stated to you, so as to make the Aggregate of Crops of all the great articles of Subsistence less than a fair average. In Ireland the Potatoes suffered extremely & the Wheat Crop was not good.\nThe Calculation in London was, a short Time since, that on the 1st. of September there remained on Hand in England at least 3 Months Consumption of the old Wheat Crop. I understand that there is great Reason to believe that this is an Exaggeration. But whether it be so or not, a Dependance must soon be felt upon us, not only for their Colonial Supply, but for their own domestic Use They can hardly look to the Baltic for Aid if Scarcity shd. occur. You will see in the public papers (of which I send you a large Parcel) that Sweden, the only friendly power in that Quarter, is menaced by France Russia & Denmark & that a Treaty of Subsidy has just been made between this Country & Sweden\nWe are still without accurate Information as to the Manner in which the late French & Dutch Decrees are executed. Some relaxation seems to have taken place (particularly in Holland) but of this there is no Certainty.\nI refer you to the Newspapers for an Account of the proceedings of the London Merchants relative to a Petition proposed agt. the orders in Council, and for general News.\nI have not troubled you with my Correspondence with this Government upon a Number of occasional Subjects, interesting only to Individuals; but I ought to state that the Disposition shewn on these Occasions has been quite friendly, as was the Conduct of the King to myself at the Levee of Wednesday last, the only one he has held for a long Time.\nMr. Bowdoin, who is about to return to the U. S. had some apprehensions, that he might meet with Interruption from British Cruizers, & requested me to obtain for him the best Security I could from this Government. I enclose what has passed on this occasion, rather as it may serve to shew their Temper towards us than for any other purpose. I have the Honor to be with the highest Esteem & Consideration Dr.Sir Your mo. Obt. Hble Serv.\nWm. Pinkney", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2807", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Joseph Warner Rose, 12 March 1808\nFrom: Rose, Joseph Warner\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nAntigua 12th March 1808.\nThe Ship Washington James Christie having been detained and sent into this Port for examination there appeared the enclosed Letter which was opened by the Registrar of the Court of Admiralty and sent to me by the Advocate General to be forwarded which I now have the Honor to do.\nI beg leave to observe that the decrees of the French Emperor has not been enforced by the Privateers of Martinique and Guadeloupe. I have also to inform you that a British Squadron of six Sail of the line Commanded by Vice Admiral Duckworth arrived in these Seas in pursuit of a French Squadron of six Sail of the Line supposed to be from Rochefort and were seen off Lisbon steering West South West. The British Admiral not finding them in Martinique departed for St. Domingo. I have the honor to be Sir Your Obedient Servant\nJoseph Warner Rose", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2808", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Anonymous, 12 March 1808\nFrom: Anonymous\nTo: Madison, James\nNo. 4\nSir,\nNew-York 12th. March 1808.\nI some time since informed you of the projected intrigues of De Witt Clinton, & that I had too high an opinion of the discernment of the present vice president, to suppose him capable of countenancing his ambitious nephew, at the loss of his own republican character.\nDeWitt endeavoured to prevail on the legislature of this state to nominate Clinton and Monroe. Being foiled, he returns to this City and sets on foot a correspondence with the old Gentleman, to draw from him that he was not committed, and by no means satisfied with the nominations at Washington. The old Mans letter, exposed to the public, will shew how far he has succeeded. I have now very little doubt but that De Witt will obtain his nomination in this state. However, I am of opinion that the legislature will delay the thing for some time yet. The Public Advertiser I apprehend is in part engaged in his service. Since he threatened to proscribe De Witt, he has received the printing of the Corporation & half of the State printing, which has caused him to quit De Witt & partially support the pretentions of old Clinton. The Editor is a very needy Man & could be bought. Had a call of the republican friends of the Washington nomination been made immediately on the merits of it here, we should have been unanimously in its favour, but De Witt has been so industrious in his promises of office & misrepresenting the acts of the administration & your private characters, that a call at this time would be injurious to our cause. I hope it will not be long so. I have not a doubt but that every officer of the United States, resident in New-York except Dr. Bullus is opposed to us. Bayley & Talmage are violent. Two or three republicans, known to be your freinds, have been removed by the influence of Spencer & De Witt.\nThe Public Advertiser of this evening will contain the 1st. No. of Aurelius, on the subject of who shall be the next President. The Editor is totally unaquainted with the Author. If subsequent numbers can obtain an insertion I shall be gratified. No. 2 & 3 will be addressed to the legislature of this State where we shall fearlessly support the Washington nomination, refute & expose Randolph &Co., protest, and point out the young & abandoned Scoundrel of this State.\nShould the legislature nominate George Clinton & the Advertiser admitt our Nos. I pledge my life that the old Man, and his hopeful Nephew shall have double the stripes that the federalists ever gave them, or the Burrites either.\nI wish it were in the power of your friends to secure the Public Advertiser. That paper has a much greater circulation with the republicans in this state than any other. The printing of the laws of the U. States perhaps would be some approach to . Some means ought to be devised. Great discretion ought to be observed on the part of your friends in making proposals on the subject. I am of opinion that M. L. Davis & Myself could Manage the thing. Wm. P. Van Ness, Author of Aristides & Second of Burr in the duel with Hamilton, has been appointed judge of Columbia County by the Clintonians. It is presumed that he is engaged to write essays in favour of George Clinton. He is an able writer. I hope we shall meet the subject, if we can only obtain their insertions in a republican paper.\nH.\nJohn Carpenter New York", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-12-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2809", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Joy, 12 March 1808\nFrom: Joy, George\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nLondon 12th. March 1808\nFinding the Sally is detained at Liverpool for Mr. Bowdoin\u2019s family, I now cover Copy of my Last and the Documents therein referred to. I have handed Lord Holland Duplicate of these Calculations with some farther Remarks particularly on the fallacy of the Testimony before the West India Committee, & especially that of Mr. Ingles relative to the supplies of Articles of the first necessity from Canada, whereas the Corn, Bread, Flour and Meal furnished by all the british settlements in America together do not exceed the 200th: part of the whole Importation, and his Lordship has assured me, with many thanks for the Communication, that he will not fail to avail himself of it. His motion is deferred till next thursday. To the Document abovementioned I am now able to add An Accot: of the Number of Neutral Vessells detained &ca. I expect shortly that of the Imports and Exports (from the latter of which there is a falling off of 3 Millions) to which I shall endeavour to add the explanatory Documents called for by Lord Auckland. I rest always and most truly, Dear sir, Your friend & Servt.\nGeo: Joy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-14-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2810", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Elias Vanderhorst, 14 March 1808\nFrom: Vanderhorst, Elias\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nBristol March 14th: 1808.\nSince my last respects to you of the 4th. of Sepr. P the New-York Packet, capt. Cottle, with Duplicate P the Laura, Capt. Rossiter, both Via New York, I have not been honored with any of your favors.\nThe Present serves to hand you the Accts. of Imports & Exports, by American Vessels, within this district for the half year ending the 31st. of Decr. last, also the Mediterranean pass of the American Ship Independence, Capt. Joseph Ingraham, cancelled, the Ship having been sold here. A few of our latest News Papers, the last London Price Currt. & likewise a State of the Bristol Infirmary for the Year 1806 (the last Published) accompanies them.\nThis month, hitherto, has been without Rain which is a circumstance always considered here as favorable for the grain Crops, even to a Proverb, but, as it has been uncommonly cold our Pastures & Gardens are in a backward state & appear to have suffered considerably.\nOur Commerce here begins to suffer severely with that of the rest of the World, and I much fear the consequences will be extremely distressing, unless Peace should soon take place of which however, I am truly sorry to say, there is at present but little appearance. Means are taking to open new sources for Commerce, and, in my opinion, much will depend upon their Success or the want of it, as to the continuance of the War, an evil which I trust America will avoid as the greatest that can possibly befall her, and which indeed, would, in all probability, not be less injurious to this Country. In short therefore, such an event can only be wished for by those who profit by the distresses of their fellow Creatures, or who are unfriendly to both Nations, as it must be obvious to every Person of the smallest discernment that their true Interests are so interwoven with each other, as to render a seperation of them, without the most serious injury to both (in the present state of things) wholly impracticable. I have the Honor to be with every consideration Sir, Your most Obt. Most Hle. Servt\nElias Vanderhorst Jr", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-14-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2811", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William C. C. Claiborne, 14 March 1808\nFrom: Claiborne, William C. C.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nNew-Orleans, March 14th. 1808.\nThe difficulty with respect to the negro\u2019s, who have sought and found an Asylum in the Province of Techus is not adjusted: A translation of Governor Salcedo\u2019s last letter upon the subject, together with a copy of the answer, which I have returned, are herein enclosed, marked A & B. I also transmit you, the number, names, and valuation of the several fugitive Slaves as stated in writing by their respective owners; Perhaps to my last Communication, Governor Salcedo may return a Satisfactory response; but I am inclined to think, that the wrong will not be remedied, without the interference of the General Government.\nIt is reported, that the Spaniards propose to recross the Sabine and to resume their former position on the Arroya Honda; but on this subject I have no certain information; I however, think it desirable, that the regular Troops in this quarter, should be considerably augmented since in the event of difficulty with any foreign Power, I am persuaded that Burr and his associates (who for the most part now rendez-vous in this and the Mississippi Territory) would become open enemies.\nThe Legislature of the Territory is still in session; they have done little and are not likely to do much more; New-Orleans, the seat of faction and Intrigue, is illy calculated for the residence of the Legislative Body; a Resolution has passed the House of Representatives, to remove the seat of Government to a little Village on the Mississippi, about 100 miles above the City, but I fear the measure will not be approved by the Council.\nThe case of Pedesclaux has been determined in favour of the Executive, and the Records delivered to the person whom I appointed the Keeper of Mortgages; on the question, as to the Clerk of the Superior Court, the Court divided; Judge Lewis adhering to his former decision, and Judge Mathews delivering an opinion, that the right of appointment was under the Ordinance vested in the Governor; Smith therefore will retain his office, unless the third Judge, when appointed shall accord with Judge Mathews I have the honor to be, Sir, very respectfully yo: mo: obt. Servt.\nWilliam C. C. Claiborne", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-15-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2813", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Richard Shippey Hackley, 15 March 1808\nFrom: Hackley, Richard Shippey\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nU. S. Consulate San Lucar de Bamas. 15th. March \u20188\nI had the honor to address you, under date the 6th of last month, ing returns from this district for the last Six months, ending the 31st december last, to which permit me to refer you.\nI now cover you copy of a note received from the Captain of the Port of this City, of the 10th Last month. On that day, The Ship George Augustus of Boston, Jos: Jackson master, and The Brig Swift, of Providence, Rhode Island, Chs. Randall master, were taken possession of by the Public Authority, the Cargoes being on Shore and under my Controul and refusing to acknowledge them Subject to that notice. No Step was taken to enforce it; About The same time, The Ship Concord, and Cargo of New York, James Russel, Master, was Seized at Ayemonte, Her Rudder, unshipped, her Sails & yards, deposited on Shore, and a Guard put on board the Ship.\nMy reply to the Captain of the port, under date the 16th. Ulo. I also Inclose, and have the pleasure to advise you that I received an order for the Liberation of the Geo. Augustus & the Swift on the 20th, and on the 22d. They Sailed for the United States. An order for releasing the Concord & Cargo followed in a few days. She still remains at Ayemonte, but I do not apprehend any further difficulty to her, or, Cargo. The Brig Mary, Hunt, from Philadelphia similarly Circumstanced has also been Liberated, with the declaration \u201cthat she could not be comprized in the Late decree as The Captain was Ignorant of it\u201d. And I have substantial reason to beleive all the Vessels brought into Algeziras, under this decree of the 3/ 8 Jany. will in a few days be restored. Nor at present does this Government, or that of the French in Portugal Shew any dispositions to operate upon their late decrees, but on the contrary, exhibit every disposition to encourage Shipments and the neighbouring Country, Where provisions are more in value daily, and want must soon overtake these dependent Countries provided, a suspension of our Intercourse Continues\nThe French Armies that have entered this Kingdom about 100,000 Men. They have possessed themselves of Some of the Strongest places on the Frontier, And the prevalent opinion is That Cadiz and the Towns in its neighbourhood will soon have Strong Garrisons of French Troops. It is believed Cadiz alone will receive fifteen Thousand. With high respect & Esteem, I have the honor to be Sir Your mo: Obt. Sert.\nRichd: S. Hackley", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-16-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2819", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Stanley Griswold, 16 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Griswold, Stanley\nSir.\nDepartment of State, March 16th. 1808.\nThe President having thought proper to revoke your Commission as Secretary of the Michigan Territory, you will please on the receipt of this notice, to deliver into the hands of the Governor the Records and other Articles which belong to the Office. I am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-16-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2820", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Josef Yznardy, 16 March 1808\nFrom: Yznardy, Josef\nTo: Madison, James\nRespected Sir.\nCadiz 16th. March 1808.\nI make bold to take up your time, requesting your Kind attention to what follows. Notwithstanding that I have the honor of your personal acquaintance, being certain, that the legality of my proceedings are well Known to you; nevertheless I am of fear that owing to so many complaints against me, they might operate and my ity suffer. Being compleatly satisfied of the zeal and just Spirit of your rectitude my hopes are confiding entirely on such good basis. You will please believe that all the ations spread and published by different sources, are fomented by Mr. Meade, who resents me severely through jealousy, seeing a Spaniard in possession of an office that he ambitions for himself; no person can have a more perfect and true Knowledge of my actions proceedings and Conduct than Mr. George W. Erving; and I would be quite happy private information from him may be called for, should there be the least doubt of my compliance.\nBe so good Sir to order the final settlement of my old standing accounts, instructions to Mr. Erving to reimburse me the Expenditures that I have made since the departure of Mr. Pinckney; by so doing I will be very thankfull to you, to whom and Your worthy Lady I wish every Kind of prosperity. Mean while believe me Respected Sir, Your devoted & most obedt. Servant\nJosef Yznardy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-16-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2821", "content": "Title: From James Madison to William Hull, 16 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Hull, William\nSir\nDepartment of State March 16th. 1808.\nThe President having thought proper to revoke the Commission of Stanley Griswold Esqr. as Secretary of the Michigan Territory, you will receive from that Gentleman the Records and other articles belonging to the Secretarys Office. I have written a Letter to Mr. Griswold by this Mail desiring that he would deliver these things to you and I presume of course that there will be neither difficulty or embarrassment in the transaction. With great Respect I have the Honor to be, Sir, Your Mo: Obt Sert\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2822", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Henry Rose, 17 March 1808\nFrom: Rose, George Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nWashington March 17th. 1808.\nBeing deeply impressed with the Sense of His Majesty\u2019s anxiety, that full effect should be given to those views of justice and moderation, by which His Conduct has been regulated thro\u2019 the whole of the unfortunate transaction whence the present differences have arisen; and of the disappointment with which He would learn the frustration of his just and equitable purposes; I have felt it incumbent upon me, on the receipt of the letter which you did me the honor to address to me on the 5th. Instant; to apply anew to this matter the most ample and serious consideration. It is with the most painful sensation of regret, that I find myself on the result of it, under the necessity of declining to enter into the terms of negotiation, which by direction of the President of the United States, you therein offer. I do not feel myself competent, in the present instance, to depart from those instructions, which I stated in my letter of the 26th. of January last, and which preclude me from acceding to the condition thus proposed. I should add, that I am absolutely prohibited from entering upon matters unconnected with the specific object I am authorised to discuss, much less can I thus give any pledge concerning them. The condition suggested moreover leads to the direct inference that the Proclamation of the President of the United States of the 2d. of July 1807, is maintained either as an equivalent for reparation for the time being, or as a compulsion to make it.\nIt is with the more profound regret that I feel myself under the necessity of declaring, that I am unable to act upon the terms thus proposed, as it becomes my duty to inform you, in conformity to my instructions, that on the rejection of the demand stated in my former letter, on the part of His Majesty, my Mission is terminated. And as His Majesty\u2019s Government in providing me with those instructions, did not conceive that after the declaration of His Sentiments respecting the Affair of the Chesapeake was made known to this Government, the state of any transactions pending or unterminated between the two nations could justify the perseverance in the enforcement of the Presidents Proclamation, I can exercise no discretion on this point.\nAs on a former occasion I detailed, tho\u2019 minutely, the motives for that demand on the part of His Majesty, which I with so much concern learn to be deemed inadmissible by the Government of the United States; I should here abstain from an exposition of them which visibly can have no further effect upon the Negotiation, if I did not deem it essential that they should not be left under any misapprehension, which I might be able to remove. I shall therefore take a short review of the transaction, which has given rise to these discussions, in order the more Correctly to determine the soundness of the principle upon which that demand is made.\nCertain deserters from His Majesty\u2019s Navy, many of them his natural born Subjects, having entered into the service of the United States, were repeatedly and fruitlessly demanded by the British officers\n\u00b0 of the Recruiting offices of the United States,\n\u00b0This interlineation was made by Mr Rose himself. J Graham\nbut were retained in their new Service. As it was a matter of Notoriety that several of these deserters were on board the Frigate of the United States the Chesapeake. They were demanded of that frigate on the high seas by His Majesty\u2019s Ship Leopard, and all knowledge of their presence on board being denied, she was attacked, and four of them, one avowedly a native Englishman, were taken out of her. Without being deterred by the consideration of how far circumstances hostile in their nature, had provoked, tho they undoubtedly by no means justified this act of the British Officer, his Majesty\u2019s government directed that a positive disavowal of the right of search asserted in this case; and of the act of the British Officer as being unauthorised; and a promise of reparation should be conveyed to the American Minister in London, before he had made any representation by order of the United States. This disavowal made on the 2d. of August last, was transmitted by him to his government, before the 6th. of that month. But before Mr. Monroe had received his orders to demand reparation, his Majesty learnt, with what surprise it is needless to dwell upon, that the President of the United States had interdicted by proclamation bearing date the 2d. of July 1807, the Entry of all their ports to the whole of His Navy; this surprise was certainly encreased, when in the letter delivered by that Minister to require redress for the wrong, altho it went into details unconnected with it, not only no concern was expressed on the part of the United States, at having felt themselves compelled to enact measures of so much, injury and indignity towards a friendly power, but no mention was made of the causes of such measures being resorted to or even of the fact of their having been adopted. In addition to the embarrassment arising from these circumstances, and the insufficiency of the explanations subsequently given to Mr Canning; the introduction of a Subject foreign to that of the complaint became the main impediment to the success of the discussions which took place in London.\nWhen I had the honor to open the Negotiation with you; Sir, as I had learnt that the President\u2019s Proclamation was still in force, it became my duty, conformably to my instructions, to require its recall as a preliminary to further discussion; had it not been in force, I was not ordered to have taken it into consideration in the adjustment of reparation; and it was considered as hardly possible that it should not have been recalled immediately upon the knowledge of his Majesty\u2019s disavowal of the attack upon the Chesapeake, as an unauthorised Act. But His Majesty could not suffer the negotiation to be carried on, on his behalf, under an interdict, which even if justifiable, in the first moment of irritation, cannot be continued after the declaration of His Majesty\u2019s sentiments upon the transaction, except in a spirit of hostility.\nIt might have been fairly contended that in the first instance, the exercise of such an act of power, before reparation was refused or unduly protracted, was incompatible with the purposes and essence of pacific negotiation, and with a demand of redress thro\u2019 that channel, but Such have been His Majesty\u2019s Conciliatory views, that this argument has not been insisted on, altho it might now be the more forcibly urged, as it appears that the government of the United States was from the first sensible that, even had hostility been meditated by the British Government, it would not have commenced it in such a manner. But the exception taken, is to the enforcement continued up to the present time, of measures highly unfriendly in their tendency, persisted in, not only after the disavowal in question; the promise of the proffer of suitable reparation; and the renewed assurances of His Majesty\u2019s amicable disposition; but, after security has been given in a public instrument bearing date the 16th. of October 1807 that the claim to the seizure of deserters from the national ships of other powers, cannot again be brought forward by His Majesty\u2019s Naval Officers, it is unnecessary to dwell upon the injury and indignity to which His Majesty\u2019s service is exposed both as touching the freedom and security of correspondents of His agents and accredited Ministers in the United States, or as resulting from a measure which in time of war, excludes the whole of His Navy from all their ports, which ports are completely open to the fleets of His enemies; it will be sufficient to observe that even where exemptions from it are granted, they are made subject to such conditions, that of the three last British Ships of War, which have entered these ports upon public business, two of them, His Majesty\u2019s Ship Statira having on board a minister sent out for the adjustment of the present differences and a schooner bearing dispatches, in consequence of their inability to procure pilots, were obliged to enter these waters without such assistance and were exposed to considerable danger. Great Britain, by the forms established, could repair the wrong committed, even to the satisfaction of the United States, no otherwise than by the channel of negotiation; yet she avowed distinctly, that a wrong was committed, and that she was ready to make reparation for it; it cannot therefore be contended, that the unavoidable delay of actual reparation subjected Her to the imputation of persisting in an aggression, which was disclaimed from the first; if this is true, however much She will regret any impediment in the adjustment of a difference, in which the feelings of this nation are so materially interested, can she consistently with a due care of her own honor and interests, allow it to be concluded on her part under an adherence to a conduct, which has a decided character of enmity in the proceedings held towards her by the other party.\nI know not in what view the perseverance in the Presidents proclamation up to this moment can be considered, but in that of a measure of retaliation; or of self-assumed reparation; or a measure intended to compel reparation; unless it be that which if I rightly understand, you define it to be, a measure of precaution.\nIf when a wrong is committed, retaliation is instantly resorted to by the injured party, the door to pacific adjustment is closed, and the means of conciliation are precluded. The right to demand reparation is incompatible with the assumption of it. When parties are in a State of mutual hostility, they are So far on a footing, and as Such they may treat; but a party disclaiming every unfriendly intention, and giving unequivocal proofs of an amicable disposition, cannot be expected to treat with another, whose conduct towards it has the direct effects of actual hostility. If then the enforcement of the Presidents Proclamation up to the present moment, is a measure of Self assumed reparation, it is directly repugnant to the spirit and fact of amicable negotiation; if it is a measure to compel reparation, it is equally so; and by the perseverance in it Great Britain is dispensed with the duty of proferring redress. But if it is a measure of precaution, in order to secure reparation or in order to compel it, it falls under the objections I have just stated. If it is a precaution adopted as a Guard against acts of violence apprehended on the part of His Majesty\u2019s naval officers, it surely cannot be considered as being as effectual a security as that arising from the renewed assurances of His Majesty\u2019s friendly disposition, which imply a due observance of the rights of nations with which Great Britain is in amity, by all persons holding authority under His Majesty\u2019s Government; from the disavowal of the pretension of the search of national ships; and from the further assurance of that disavowal given in His Majesty\u2019s Proclamation of the 16th. of October last. Neither under these concurrent circumstances can the plea of necessity be maintained, and if such a proceeding has not the plea of necessity, it assumes the character of aggression. If these concurrent securities against Such an apprehension have any value, the necessity no longer exists; if they are of no value, negotiation cannot be attempted, as the basis upon which it rests, the mutual confidence of the two parties, would be wholly wanting. From the moment after the unfortunate affair of the Chesapeake, that His Majesty\u2019s naval commanders in these waters had ascertained that they were safe from the effervescence of that popular fury, under which the most glaring outrages were committed and by which they were very naturally led to the supposition that they were objects of particular hostility and that a state of war against them, requiring precautions on their part had commenced; no conduct has been imputed to them, which could vindicate the necessity of maintaining in force the President\u2019s Proclamation.\nSince that time Such of those officers as have been necessitated by the circumstances of the war to remain in these waters, have held no communication with the shore, except in an instance too trifling to dwell upon and instantly disavowed by the commanding officer; and they have acquiesced quietly in various privations, highly prejudicial to the service they were upon, and in consequence of an interdict, which had they been regardless of their duties towards a state in amity with their sovereign, and had they not carefully repressed the feelings its tone and language had a direct tendency to provoke in them would have rather excited than have averted the evils it was Stated to be intended to prevent, were they regardful of these duties, it was unnecessary. Had they felt themselves obliged completely to evacuate the Waters of the United States, especially whilst an enemy\u2019s squadron was harboured in them, They could have done it, but under the admission of hostile compulsion, and under such compulsion, carried into full effect, His Majesty could not have dissembled the extent of the injury received.\nIn the several cases adduced, in which Great Britain required certain preliminaries, previously to entering into negotiation, she regulated her conduct by the same principles to which She now adheres; and refused whilst no hostility was exhibited on her part, to treat with Powers, whose proceedings denoted it towards her; and who maintained their right in what they had assumed.\nFrom the considerations thus offered I trust that neither the order of reason or that of usage are in contradiction to the demand I have urged, nor am I aware how the order of time opposes the revocation in the first instance of that act, which affects injuriously one of the Parties, and is still avowed by the other.\nThe subject is thus presented to you, Sir, in the light in which it was natural, that it should offer itself to His Majesty\u2019s Government. It certainly conceived the Presidents Proclamation to rest chiefly and most materially upon the attack made upon the Frigate of the United States, the Chesapeake, by His Majesty\u2019s Ship Leopard, altho\u2019 other topics were adduced as accessories; In this apprehension it may be held to have been Sufficiently warranted, by the precise time at which, and the circumstances, under which it was issued; and by its whole context, and the more so, as the impulse under which it was drawn up appears to have been so sudden, as to have precluded a due examination of all the grounds of allegation contained in it. And here I beg leave to assure you, that with respect to the spirit, and tone of that instrument, it would be highly satisfactory to me, if I could feel myself justified in expressing on the part of His Majesty any degree of coincidence with the opinions you have anounced, or when thus appealed to, and making every allowance for the irritation of the moment, I could dissemble the extreme surprize experienced by Great Britain, that the Government of a friendly Nation, even before an amicable demand of reparation was made, and yet meaning to make that demand; Should have issued an edict directing measures of injury very disproportionate to what it knew was an unauthorised offence, and both in its terms and its purport so injurious to the government to which that demand was to be addressed, & tending to call forth in both Nations the feelings under which a friendly adjustment would be the most difficult. But if as I learn from you, Sir, the Proclamation rests Substantially on other causes, it is then peculiarly to be regretted, that together with the demand for redress made in September last, the Government of the United States did not think fit to offer a negotiation, or an explanation of so momentous a measure, or to declare that its recall must be more or less connected with the adjustment of other alledged wrongs. Neither did it think it necessary to return any answer to the remonstrance given in by His Majestys Envoy at Washington, on the 13th. of July 1807 in which he represented \"that he considered that interdiction to be so unfriendly in its object, and so injurious in its consequences to His Majestys interests, that he could not refrain from expressing the most sincere regret, that it ever should have been issued, and most earnestly deprecating its being enforced\".\nIt could not be supposed that a circumstance of so great weight could be over looked by His Majesty\u2019s Government, in determining the line of conduct to be held in the negotiation: and as little could it be expected to pass it over, when on the failure of the discussions with Mr. Monroe, it directed a special mission to be sent to the United States. It had the less reason to imagine that any other grievances could be connected with that for the adjustment of which I am empowered to negotiate, as Mr. Monroe, in his letter to Mr. Canning, of the 29th. of July last, had stated with respect to other subjects of remonstrance that it was improper to mingle them with the present more serious cause of complaint, an opinion to which Mr. Canning declared his perfect assent, in his letter to that Minister of the 2d. of the subsequent month; so that this act was left as single and distinct to be singly and distinctly considered. His Majesty\u2019s Government therefore could not consistently with any view of the subject then before it, or indeed with the just object of my Mission, direct or empower me to enter upon matters not connected with that of the Chesapeake, and they could with the less propriety do it, as in order to render the adjustment of differences of such a nature, the more easy and the more conspicuous, the Ministers charged especially with such offices have been with few, if any exceptions restricted to the precise affair to be negotiated. With respect therefore to those other causes of complaint, upon which you inform me that the Presidents Proclamation rests, I cannot be furnished with documents enabling me either to admit or to controvert those statements of grievance foreign to the attack upon that Ship contained in your letter; or authorised to discuss the matters themselves. I shall therefore not allow myself to offer Such Comments as my personal knowledge of some of those transactions suggest to me, altho their tendency would materially affect both the marked manner in which those transactions are pourtrayed, and the disadvantageous light in which His Majesty\u2019s Government is represented to have acted respecting them. I am moreover led to the persuasion that my Government will be the more easily able to rescue itself from inculpation, by the inference arising from passages in Mr. Monroe\u2019s letter to Mr. Secretary Canning of the 29th. of September last, that the differences unhappily existing between the two nations were in a train of adjustment.\nIf His Majesty has not permitted me to enter into the discussion of the Search of Neutral Merchant Ships for British Seamen, together with the adjustment of the amount of reparation for the attack upon the Chesapeake; it was no wise with a view of precluding the further agitation of that question at a Suitable time; but it was that the Negotiation might be relieved from the Embarrassment arising from the connection of the present Matter with one So foreign to it, and, as it was but too well known, So difficult to be adjusted, of a right distinctly disclaimed, with one which Great Britain has at all times asserted, of enforcing her claim to the services of her natural born subjects, when found on board Merchant Vessels of other Nations; a claim which she founds in that principle of universal law, which gives to the State the right of requiring the aid and assistance of her native Citizens. The recurrence therefore to that course of negotiation, which had been originally settled between Mr. Secretary Canning and Mr. Monroe, and which had been alone broken in upon by the orders subsequently received by that Minister, can only be considered as a resumption of that course of things which Great Britain strenuously contended there was no ground to depart from. I may observe that this purpose might have been effected without the intervention of a Special Minister.\nIt will be in your recollection, Sir, that in our first interview, I stated the condition, which makes the subject of the present letter, before I was informed by you, that the President of the United States would consent to the separation of the two subjects.\nI had trusted that the exposition, which I added in my letter of the 26th. of January to the verbal explanation I had before offered, of the grounds of His Majesty\u2019s demand, was both in its purport and in the terms in which it was couched, such as to prevent a suspicion that they were in their intention derogatory to the honor or calculated to wound the just sensibility of this Nation. I may add that such a supposition could not be reconciled with the various ostensible and unequivocal demonstrations of His Majesty\u2019s good faith, and anxiety, that this transaction should be brought to an amicable termination, which were exhibited even prior to any remonstrances made on the part or by order of this Government. The other topics which I felt myself authorised to advance in that letter, in illustration of that amicable disposition on the part of the King, were brought forward from the conviction entertained that they must be of a nature to be satisfactory to this Government, and therefore Such as it was particularly my duty to enforce, but not with a view to rest upon them the right to advance the claim which I have stated.\nI may here remark, It is obvious that far from requiring that the first steps towards an arrangement of reparation should be taken by the United States, Great Britain has already made them openly and distinctly: they are indubitable testimonies to the respect borne and decidedly marked by Great Britain, to the ties of amity subsisting between the two Nations, and of her cordial desire to maintain them unimpaired; and as such alone they were urged.\nAs His Majesty would have derived sincere satisfaction from the evidence of corresponding feelings on the part of the United States, so it would be the more painful to me, to dwell upon a series of insults and menaces which without any provocation of war like preparation on the part of Great Britain, have been for months accumulated upon her thro\u2019 the United States, and but too frequently from quarters, whose authority necessarily and powerfully commanded attention.\nI ought perhaps to apologise for adverting to an incidental expression in your Letter, if I did not think it right to remove any ambiguity respecting the nature of the claim which Great Britain maintained to her seamen, native Citizens of the Realm, who have deserted from her service to that of other Powers: it is, that on demand they shall be discharged forthwith, and consequently they shall instantly be freed from their newly contracted obligations.\nBefore I close this letter, allow me to state to you, Sir, that I have felt it my duty to transmit to His Majesty\u2019s Government the exposition, contained in your letter of the 5th. instant, of the various demands on the honor and good faith of Great Britain on which the complaint is made, that satisfaction has not been afforded to the United States, and on which conjointly with the affair of the Chesapeake, you inform me that the Proclamation of the President of the United States of the 2d. of July 1807. is founded. It will be for His Majesty\u2019s Government to determine on the part of Great Britain whether any, and what, obligations remain to be fulfilled by her. Whether any denial, or such protraction of redress have occurred on her part, as to render necessary or justifiable the perseverance in an edict, which when not necessary or justifiable assumes a character of aggression; and whether on the result of these considerations the present negotiation can be resumed on the part of His Majesty with a due regard for His own honor, or with a prospect of a more successful termination. \nI have the Honor to be with the Highest Consideration, Sir, Your Most Obedient, and Most Humble Servant,\nG H Rose", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2823", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Thomas Truxtun, 17 March 1808\nFrom: Truxtun, Thomas\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nPhiladelphia 17th. March 1808.\nThe enclosed written in honesty & truth, I forward open under this cover for my friend Captain Tingey. I know too much of what is going on to be Silent. I directed Tingey to Shew it to you, but as delay would be occasioned by his first receiving it, I enclose it to You at once, confidentially, and ask the favour of your putting a wafer in it, and causeing it to be dropt in the post office when you have read it. It is not intended for the perusal of any other Gentlemen, at least none but such as are in Your Confidence and Interest. I have the honor to be Sir Respectfully Your Obt huml. sert\nThomas Truxtun\n marked private", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-17-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2826", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Valentin de Foronda, 17 March 1808\nFrom: Foronda, Valentin de\nTo: Madison, James\nMuy Se\u0148or mio:\nPhilada. 17. de Marzo de 1808.\nEspero que tendr\u00e1 V. S. la bondad de pedir \u00e1 su Excella. el Se\u0148or Presidente, se conceda el permiso de la salida de un Barco para conducir \u00e1 Espa\u0148a al Marques de Casa Yrujo y su familia; bien entendido que ir\u00e1 completamente en lastre; pues debe tranferirse \u00e1 Europa esta primavera en conformidad de las disposiciones de S. M. mi Soberano. Dios gue. \u00e1 V. S. Ms. as. B. L. M de V. S. su mas atento servidor\nValentin de Foronda", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2828", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Pseudonym: \"Conon\", 18 March 1808\nFrom: Pseudonym: \u201cConon\u201d\nTo: Madison, James\npublished March 18, 1808\nYou will not be surprised when you see your name at the head of a letter. The situation in which you have placed your self as the expectant of executive honors, renders your character, a proper subject of scrutiny, and you must have calculated, on receiving applause or condemnation, according to the light in which your conduct was viewed. The former has been lavishly bestowed; the latter, I feel most unwilling to express. But, sir, I am one of the millions interested in your prospects, and I have doubts respecting you, which mar my pleasure in contemplating you as the future chief of our nation. I will not apply to either Marcus or Tullius--their laboured sophistry and verbose zeal are illy calculated to satisfy my anxiety. Do not think, however, that I have any peculiar interests or selfish views before me. I am not loaded with present honors--a greedy expectant of patronage--nor a laborer for literary fame. My age and my situation, alike unfit me for either.\nA President of the United States should be a person of eminent talents, of great political sagacity. He should be capable, not only of theoretical but of practical excellence in the science of politics--capable of developing the effects of principles, adapting them to the state of society, pursuing and supporting them with the perseverance of integrity and conviction. I do not believe you such a man. The history of your life does not justify the belief. That you possess much virtue, must be evident--but perhaps we may discover that it is of that unsuspecting, pliant kind, which is better fitted for the farm and the fire side than for the scenes of public life.\nYou have made frequent displays of genius and proved yourself to be capable of supporting an opinion, with energy and elegance. After discovering the truth, or being directed to it by experience, you are one of its ablest defenders. But unfortunately you have too often discovered it, when for ought you could do, it was for ever too late. Do you suppose the principles you advocated at the formation of the constitution of the United States calculated at this moment to secure the confidence of the people? Were you then the adherent of principles you now profess? The memories of the people are not treacherous, nor their confidence in political conversions, hasty or unlimited. Your efforts on that occasion were great, but were they great in support of those sentiments, which republicans love? You shine with considerable brilliancy in the Virginia convention--you perhaps merit much of the applause arising from the formation of many parts of the constitution, but were they its republican features for which you stood sponsor? One would imagine not, from your public speeches and your essays in the Federalist. With all the alterations and amendments to which that instrument has been subjected and which you opposed, we have seen, that in too many instances it may be readily converted in practice; to something widely different from a republican constitution. Should you not, if your discernment be not too highly applauded, have foreseen these effects, & instead of opposing, have exerted your self to add new guards against abuse? Or does your merit lie, in forming theoretic beauties and practical incongruities? Are you certain that as President you will not find cases where something more than theory will be required? You will not shelter yourself behind the excuse, which Marcus has erected to save you. You will not tell me that we have only seen what may be made of the constitution in the hands of a skilful artist. For your discernment, and skill in political science, have been praised. Besides, you were told with the energy of inspiration, what a \"skilful artist\" might do with it. The ease, with which it might be perverted, gained Hamilton\u2019s support and was one of the strongest objections to its ratification. Yet you braved the danger, you thought it perfect without amendments. And I am at a loss to discover how he can be proved to be the very best person to manage it, who saw no necessity for many of its parts. The mariner who heedlessly or ignorantly runs into danger will scarcely be trusted, when a more provident pilot can be procured. Ask your memory if your opponent be not such an one.\nThis is not the first time that you have had the honor of a contest with James Monroe. Your popularity and talents have before been tried against him--and you may possibly see the very same result. Does the recollection of the principles on which you contended, afford any gratification to your republican feelings? Do you feel the glow of conscious satisfaction, at the superior accuracy of your judgment? At the time to which I refer, you had no longer the plea of disunion as the consequence of the measure, your opponent advocated. The horrors of anarchy no longer haunted your imagination--your talents had fair scope for operation. And whose principles have since been declared to be correct? The decision of the nation has been audibly pronounced. Why then do you claim so decided a superiority of talents? It is not for the sake of contrast alone, that I remind you of these times and these matters. They prove, either that your penetration does not merit the eulogies it receives, or that you were not at all times such a republican as merits trust. You have, \u2019tis said, the honor of speedily changing your course. Desertion of error is ever meritorious. But why did you change? Did you see the correctness of your former opponents? Did you begin to discover the true objects of your fellow laborers, Hamilton &c. Or did you see no prospect of climbing that ladder to whose top you are now so hastily mounting? We would be apt to conclude that it was the latter, since those mens\u2019 principles had been well known, from the time that Hamilton offered his monarchical project in the convention. And yet you condescend to become the political associate, the fraternal partner of those men in the propagation of a creed! Your services in Congress were commendable--but why did you retire in despair? You certainly saw some danger in the course then pursued, or you would not have opposed it. Your character forbids us to harbor the idea that you would not swim with the tide, as long as your conscience would permit you. Was it becoming in you to shrink from the danger which you perceived before you? Is it the part of the patriot to see his country laboring and to cease to afford aid while a glimmering of hope remains! Or will you rely on Marcus to make your excuse? Marcus is singularly unfortunate. He would put such reliance on the progress of opinion, as to render useless any accelerating efforts. His plea accuses the laborers in the republican cause with a stupid and unnecessary perseverance. Their work would have been performed by the \"progress of opinion\" without their aid. What short-sighted men they must be, not to have discovered this truth and to have spared themselves the labors they underwent. Does your champion rely on your own example, to prove that a change of principle must inevitably follow from the state of the nation at that time? Did the conviction, that your exertions were not needed, arise from this example and experience? The calculation terminated well, but does little credit either to your wisdom, your patriotism, or your perseverance. It is better fitted to form a cover to disgust, irresolution and despair. Or do you prefer the other excuse of private and professional interests? Are they to be preferred to the public good? If so, why then do we so soon see you at the Federal City? Was your professional character so soon established, your fortune so soon mended? You have a competitor whose professional reputation has been neglected, whose fortune has been destroyed, sacrificed in the public service. Why is the Secretary-ship so long borne, when the responsibility of a representative was a little time ago, too heavy a burden? Marcus should not have forgotten, that the Presidency was in view.\nThere is another part of your conduct that I cannot recollect with any considerable degree of satisfaction. Wny is your house the peculiar and favored resort of federal worthies, and your office filled with federal men? Does it arise from partiality to them? From a disposition which can readily associate with the most obnoxious materials, party can afford. From a culpable irresolution which fears the performance of an invidious duty--a distinction between parties--a preference of the friends of the administration? I can conceive no other motive. I leave you to your choice. Either of them should be equally injurious to your pretensions. Mr. Brent will excuse me for naming him. It cannot be from disrespect to him as a man. His fame except as a federalist has not been loud enough to reach me. Why was he selected as the object of patronage? Were his talents so admirable? Was there not one of your own party, in whom you could confide? Or are there, less manifest, but more operative reasons behind the curtain? Did you seek the popularity of his country, his friends and his party? Or was it because he was the distinguished pupil of Alexander Hamilton? Had I remembered that you were that gentleman\u2019s associate in the labors of the Federalist, I might have spared you these questions.\nYou have often been charged with partiality to Yazooism. Your report certainly looks something like it. But I believe you too honest, far too honest, to be interested in that hideous speculation. Your advice on the subject I take to be the dictates of your judgment--But it evidently is a judgment warped by feeling, fearful of dangers, and timidly shrinking from right lest it should encounter difficulties. You see corruption stalking before you--you detest the object, but you would buy its peace rather than oppose & subdue it. You would give a premium to infamy, to ensure present quiet, rather than affix the proper mark upon it, lest it murmur. The motives of your conduct cannot meet my approbation--yet, are they motives and feelings which seem to have operated through your whole life. And do you believe that a temporising policy is the best policy? Do you esteem it correct to pardon and conciliate corruption when it is noisy? I shudder at the prospect of an executive, constituted as ours is, who professes such a belief. Republican principles and the good of our country know not how to temporize. They know no affinity to corruption. They cannot exist one moment in the air which it pollutes.\nIt is painful, but it is necessary to remind you of a fact which does little credit to your heart or your understanding. It was not very long since that we had an ambassador in Europe who was odiously criminal. This ambassador had something to do in the purchase of Louisiana, that is, he received the credit of assisting in the negociation, because he had not ability to frustrate it. When his associate, one of the first ornaments of our country communicated to you at considerable length, the multiform criminality of this man, you replied to this effect--\"Your communications have been received--you may rest satisfied that you will receive your full share of credit for the Louisiana purchase.\" Does such a reply need a single comment? If you are not far more depraved than I suspect you to be, at least a momentary blush will color your cheeks when you think your fellow-citizens are reading this answer to a lengthy, a disinterested, an important communication. Was it envy, was it malice, that dictated these words? Was it such a communication as the interests of your country demanded? Was it paying to the man, to whom it was addressed, the respect due to the station which he held? In what feature of his life did you see a foundation for so damning an insinuation as your note conveys? Or did you see in him the future rival, the dangerous competitor for future honors? Are we to read in it the movements of your mind? Can it be the expression of your feelings? Short as it is, your friends may read in it a volume of testimony. I look with anxiety to the time when the writer of such a note is to guide the destinies of my country.\nWhen sometime after this event, a gentleman offered to substantiate this minister\u2019s baseness, you replied as if ex officio, that the executive would have nothing to do with the matter. Why was this? I am perplexed and confounded in the attempt to trace this reply also to its cause. Was the matter of so little consequence to the government, the honor, and interests of the country? Are we to trace this again to your want of decision and courage? Or is corruption so dangerous to you that you fear to have it started? Pardon the question. Your conduct is so inexplicable, that it is not surprising the idea should be suggested. But we will repress it. Your motives were probably less opposed to an honest, more consonant to an ambitious mind, looking forward to a Presidential election.\nWill you also explain, why our commissioners under the Louisiana Convention, were embarrassed for support? I should be fearful to trust the memory which could, for such a length of time, leave such characters destitute of the funds voted by their country and drawn from its treasury. Are you not suspicious that your country will attach something more than forgetfulness to this circumstance, until it is explained?\nThe administration to which you belong has met with some opponents, where, perhaps, they were least to be expected. It is true, they have received the disapprobation of a majority of the republicans. I do not rank in the list of their warmest friends. And yet perhaps they have better causes of dissatisfaction than their country is aware of. If I do not err in my calculation, James Madison has been in no small degree influential in converting his own enemies into opponents to the administration. As I have observed the occasional agitations which have been felt in public matters, the cloud has seemed to rise from you and to burst about you. At some other time the reason may be probed. Marcus indeed tells us, that you never made an enemy, that only those of the administration have been marshalled against you as one of its members. But Marcus is to be excused; he feels a sympathy for you. The force of this feeling is great in the human breast; and there is too striking a similarity in the conduct, character and habits of yourself and Marcus, for him not to experience toward you, the most powerful emotions. Memory seems to add peculiar energy to his zeal. His portrait often obliges the enquiry whether J. Madison was the only object before him at all times not because he has pourtrayed himself, but because he has so labored to conceal certain facts and certain traits of character.\nMy letter is finished. I do not promise myself much success from my attempt--My abilities do not warrant the expectation. But I love republicanism too well not to speak, when I believe, that if you are elected, your administration will be a palsying blow to it. You will not charge me, as your friends have before charged your opponents, with unfairness, and an attempt to spargere voces in vulgum ambiguas]. The doubts expressed are by no means equivocal. If they can be removed, I shall rejoice. If not, I like others, will prepare myself for that contest of opinion which must result from your election.\nConon", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2829", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Sylvanus Bourne, 18 March 1808\nFrom: Bourne, Sylvanus\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nConsulate of the U States of America AmsterdamMarch 18 1808\nIt appears to every one extraordinary what can be the motives influencing this Govt. to hold on the embargo on Amn Vessels while such is not at present the case in France & indeed in some degree to controvert the favorable disposition of this Govt. towards the U States of which I have indulged an opinion as before communicated. I have made two applications on this subject indirectly but can obtain no satisfactory nor even any reply from Govt. and as it is not for me as the Agent of a foreign Country to insist on the exposition of the motives which may influence the Cabinet herein, I must look to time for its proper development.\nHaving already had the honor to address you fully by this Conveyance I must beg leave to refer you to Mr. Rittenhouse the Bearer hereof for particular information on the affairs of Europe. The last of the enclosed Gazettes contains a State Document from Russia tantamount to a declaration of war against Sweden in full completion of the Continental Combination against England. With great Respect I am Sir Yr. Obt. Servt.\nS Bourne", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2830", "content": "Title: From Thomas Jefferson to Caesar Augustus Rodney, 18 March 1808\nFrom: Jefferson, Thomas\nTo: Rodney, Caesar Augustus,Madison, James\nTh: Jefferson asks the favor of the heads of departments and Atty Genl to meet to-day at 12. oclock on a consultation.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-18-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2831", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Barnabas Bidwell, 18 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Bidwell, Barnabas\nprivate\nDear Sir\nWashington Mar.18. 1808\nI have been some time possessed of your favor of the 19th. Ult. from Bennington; and have duly communicated its contents where it was proper they should be known. The idea which prevails is that the people you describe should understand that their good dispositions are valued & will be respected; but that nothing more is wished than is consistent with prudence on their part; that is they should be as quiet as possible, leaving things in every event to the course which can, without more than inactivity on their part, be given to them.\nI should have sooner acknowledged your favor; but have constantly been in hopes of being able to disclose to you, the result of the tedious proceedings with Mr. Rose. Untill this moment the issue has not been final, nor the veil of reserve taken off. Indeed now, as the communications have not been made to Congs. & cannot be for some days, I do not wish for what I write to be made public, or even to be mention\u2019d within your confidential circle with my name attached to it. The sum of the business, is that Mr. Rose opened his mission with a notice that he was precluded by his instructions from entering upon any negociation concerning the affair of the Chesapeake until the President\u2019s proclamation should be revoked. This he was told was inadmissible on every ground. There was sufficient reason also for believing that other conditions lurked within the precincts of the negociation even if the preliminary were not inadmissible. It was at length proposed to him, that if he would state the terms of satisfaction he had to offer, & they should be found satisfactory, a repeal of the proclamn. & an act of reparation, might bear the same date. To this compromise his instructions would not permit him to accede; & he closed his mission, with signifying that it rested with his Govt. to decide whether the negociation could or could not be resumed, consistently with its views & its honor. As soon as the papers can be prepared, the whole will be laid before Congs. and thro\u2019 that channel soon be placed under the eye of the public. Very sincerely & respectfully I remain Dr. Sir Your Obedt. hble Sert.\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2834", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Howell, 19 March 1808\nFrom: Howell, George\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nPhiladelphia 19 March 1808.\nI have been, at length favoured with a sight of the confidential communication of the Minister of the French Police, to General Armstrong, which was transmitted to you, and of which I am the Subject. I think it proper, therefore to submit to your consideration Such remarks, as appear to me to arrise naturally from the Communication, and from the feelings of a man, who is injured by a groundless accusation.\nThe paper, as well as my recollection Serves me for I was not permitted to take any notes of it, contains the following allegations:\nThat I had associated with persons of bad fame in Paris, That I had obtained Plates, and had already a great quantity of false bills of the Government of the United States, That I had left Paris about two months before this charge was exhibited, for Bordeaux, in company with an associate, and had embarked from thence with my associate for the United States: That I was immediately to return to London and Amsterdam, as my coming directly from America was to give facility to my proposed operation in the Sale of the false effects:\nIt also appears, therefrom, that information of this plan had been given to the police in Holland, and that General Armstrong was advised to apprise the American Minister in London of it. It is declared, that this information is obtained from Mr. .\nThe difficulty and indeed the impossibility of establishing the negative of a charge like the present, formed on the basless fabric of a revery, is very evident. I feel, however, every possible desire to establish my innocence in the view of the Government, That its high sense of justice may render me speedily all the redress which is in its power to offer.\nIn the first place, then Sir, I most Solemnly deny the charge and appeal with confidence to the whole tenor of my past life, as having been Such as by no means to warrant the beleif of any Such intentions as are imputed to me. I cannot, indeed, trace every act of my life; and if I could, it is possible, that it might present Some things to view, which more experience of the World, and longer reflection, would correct. But I can with perfect Safety invite you to an inquiry, which would Show, that though I may be unknown to Government, my intercourse, association and correspondence in life, have been with men of character and respectability. I do therefore most Solemnly challenge the World to produce that transaction of my life, which will Support the probability of an accusation like the present.\nWith respect to the charge itself, I have to remark, that it may be true that whilst at Paris, I may have been occasionally in the Society of Men of lax Morals. It is doubtless well known to You, Sir, that the facile habits of polite intercourse in France, renders it extremely difficult for the most guarded Stranger, to obtain a knowledge of the characters of Men in large private circles in Paris, and the difficulty is still greater in those public Societies and Clubs where foreign Ministers and Gentlemen from all parts of Europe occasionally go, to hear the News, pass the evening and amuse themselves. To such places, I acknowledge, as I had leisure I frequently resorted, and the imputation of my having formed improper associations founded most probably on this circumstance and the consequences attempted to be drawn from it, may with equal justice stain the reputation of Men of the first rank, who were also in the habit of visiting the places I refer to.\nYou will with readiness appreciate the accuracy of the principal charge against me, when you perceive the incorrectness of all the circumstances particularly mentioned in connexion with it. If you find that my nameless accuser is wholly incorrect in his positive allegations of my movements both before and Since my return to America, and in facts stated too with great confidence, you will naturally deem the denunciation of a more dubious character, and more easily incline to beleive, that it originated from wicked and corrupt designs.\nI pray you then, Sir, to advert to the charges against me, whilst I state in opposition to them, the following facts, which I am perfectly prepared to prove.\nAfter a detention of some time at Paris, to obtain the payment of near five thousand dollars of Exchange drawn by the French Agents at St. Domingo on the Treasury at Paris, I was finally obliged to leave them unpaid and have Still to regret the want of justice in the French Government. I left Paris, in the most open and public manner, without any associate, for Nantes, and not for Bordeaux. My passport was Signed by Mr. Skipwith on the 1st. of August 1806, countersigned by Talleyrand on the 20th. of the same Month, and was enregistered at Nantes on the 6th. of September following. At Nantes, I embarked in the Ship Richard, of and for New York, commanded by Capt. Rogers, without visiting Bordeaux at All. The only passengers on board, beside myself, were a Mr. Ackin, Merchant his Wife and two Children, and a Mr. James Blackwell, a Young Gentleman of New York, both now living there, and persons of the first respectability. I embarked for New York as I came out with powers to act conjointly with Messrs. Daniel Ludlow & Co, to recover, on Commission, from Messrs. , Bayard & Mc. Evers, from \u00a312,000 to \u00a314000 Stg. for Mr. Antoine Scherle of Paris. The winter 1806-7 I passed in New York, attending to this business, and have Since been occupied, in different parts of the United States, with Various concerns of my own, and that without any suspicion of the calumny which has reached the Government, untill the Month of December last when Doctr Shippen informed me, that a Director of the Bank had Spoken of it publicly in a Company in this City.\nI pray you then, to notice particularly upon the charges made against me, that so far as it is in the power of proof to go I am supported by facts in the establishment of my innocence, which give complete contradiction to my nameless accuser. I cannot indeed prove to You that I had not plates, that I had not false bills, that I had not guilty and criminal designs. In the nature of things, this is impossible. But I can prove, that I left Paris publicly, that I went to Nantes, that I did not go to Bordeaux, that I did not embark from Bordeaux, that I had not any associate, that I did not return to London and Amsterdam, and that from the nature of my engagements in the United States, and the Commission I undertook to execute at New York, such a return could not have been contemplated by me. I add further my arrival in my native Country, during almost the of which time I was ignorant, that the French police had made me the Subject; of its denunciation; and that during that period not the least occasion to justify the apprehension that I had guilty designs, can possibly have occured.\nI state also, and can prove, that my movements after I left Paris were matter of no Secrecy: whilst at Nantes, I corresponded with several persons at Paris, and particularly with Mr. James Swan, who Saw, almost daily, the American Minister. I deny that I have ever, directly or indirectly, employed any engraver, Paper Maker, printer, Artisan or Agent of any kind, connected with an object, that could give rise to this accusation. I defy the to produce the Slightest proof to Support the accusation against me, and I declare, in the most Solemn manner, that the charge is false, groundless, & corrupt.\nOne other circumstance may deserve Some attention; You will please to observe, Sir, that the communication States that I had left Paris about two Months before the charge was exhibited. If any facts of a suspicious kind had been in the knowledge of the police or its agents, at or before my departure from Paris, it is well known that its Vigilance and its powers, would not have Suffered me to avoid detection. The accusation must, then, have originated in my absence, and my accuser have been well aware that he could do it with impunity, as I was without opportunity to oppose the charge and vindicate my innocence.\nI do not conceive it necessary to Say any more in my defence, and shall leave the Subject, with a Submission to your candid consideration, of my unfortunate situation. I have been harassed beyond measure, and almost beyond endurance, with the consideration of what course Should be regarded as most expedient to be pursued. Could my accuser be reached by the of law I might compel him to Support the charge, or respond for the falsehood and malice of the accusation. Had the Strong hand of been laid upon me I might have challenged and obtained a public investigation, and before an independent judiciary established my innocence. But to what forum can I apply, and what laws can redress me, for the ruin and mischief which must flow from this Secret, anonymous, and destructive calumny? I impute nothing to the Government of my own Country. Its motives have been unquestionably pure, though I am free to declare, that I think the injury would never have been inflicted, if its wisdom and justice had first investigated, before its prudence and caution had, to prevent ideal injury, circulated the calumny. Under all these afflicting and perplexing circumstances I have only to ask as matter of the strictest justice, that the subject may be more fully considered, as connected with my defence, and that if this cruel charge shall be found to rest only on the anonymous, improbable and inconsistent basis now presented, and which I concieve to be destroyed by the facts I have stated, that the Government will Seek to repair the injury it has done me. It is impossible however, that it can be complete, for as I have already observed the Secret has been improperly divulged, by those to whom it was confidentially imparted, and it will be difficult for a remedy to reach all the evil it has produced: as an immoral imputation when once, sanctioned by public authority, is fatal and ruinous if not immediatly remedied. I therefore with confidence repeat my expectation that the Government\u2019s well known respect for the Spirit of our laws and Constitution and above all its regard for injured and defenceless innocence, will cause it to remove as far as is possible, all the injurious impressions created against me, by its former communications, by issuing other Circulars calculated to do away the effects of those of March last. I have the honor to be very respectfully Sir Your Most obd. Servt.\nG. Howell", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2835", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Henry Rose, 19 March 1808\nFrom: Rose, George Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nWashington March 19th. 1808\nPermit me to request, that You will have the goodness to procure for me An Audience of Leave of the President of The United States, on the Termination of my Mission.\nAllow me at the same time to express to you these Sentiments of distinguished personal, as well as public Consideration, with which I have the honr to be, Sir, your most obedient and most humble Servant,\nG. H. Rose", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2836", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Elias Vanderhorst, 19 March 1808\nFrom: Vanderhorst, Elias\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nMarch 19th. 1808.\nThe preceding is a Copy of my last of the 14th. Instt. P the Ship Laura, Capt. Rossiter, Via New-York.\nThe Weather still continues dry and very cold for the Season, insomuch that I think every Kind of vegetation (and the young Wheat) must now be suffering considerably.\nEnclosed I hand you a few of our NewsPapers to which I beg leave to refer you for what is passing here, of a Public Nature. The Political storm which has been so long raging in this quarter of the Globe seems now to be hastening to a terrible crisis, and I much fear its effects will soon be seriously and calamitously felt universally. I have the Honor to be Sir, Your most Ob Sert.\nElias Vanderhorst\nEnclosed also is the London Price Current of yesterday.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2837", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Albert Gallatin, 19 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Gallatin, Albert\nSir.\nDept: of State, March 19th: 1808.\nI request you to be pleased to issue a warrant, on the appropriation for the relief of Seamen, for Seventy nine dollars 70/100, in favor of James Davidson Esqr., the holder of the enclosed Bill of Exchange for that amount drawn upon me by James Leander Cathcart, Consul of the United Sates, at Madeira, on the 31st. of Decr. last, who is to be charged with the same on the Books of the Treasury. I am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2838", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Thomas Mathews, 19 March 1808\nFrom: Mathews, Thomas\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nVirginia Norfolk 19th. March 1808\nI have written to Genl. Dearborn, soliciting a Lieutenancy in the Infantry, for my young friend Mr. William Hamilton of the state of North Carolina. You have been too long acquainted with me Sir, to suppose that I would recommend any Man without being firmly persuaded of his ability to discharge the duties of the Office for which He is recommended: and when I inform you that Mr. Hamilton\u2019s connections are respectable, that the three last years of life has been spent at the University of Prince Town, and that his moral character is second to no youth in the Union, I feel no hesitation in soliciting your aid, in favor of my application. I have the Honor to be With great respect & esteem Dear Sir Your most obt. Sert.\nThos. Mathews", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-19-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2839", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Taylor, 19 March 1808\nFrom: Taylor, James\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nNew Port Ky. 19th.. Mar: 1808\nI hope this will find you perfectly recovered from your indisposition with which I was sorry to find you were afflicted. I also hope this will find my good friend Mrs. Madison in good health also Mr. & Mrs. Cutts. I sincerely simpathize with both Mr. Jackson and his friends in the late truly lamentable domestic afflictions that have been added to the catilogue of his misfortunes since I had the pleasure of seeing him I beg to be remembered with affection to the whole connection.\nI am well apprised of your situation and by no means wish you to do any thing with the inclosed papers that you may think improper. In the event of your thinking I ask of you too much, I will only ask your advice to either suppress those papers, or seal them up in the inclosed cover to Mr. Pope if you do not wish to converse with him on the subject, and send it to him.\nI shall be glad to hear from you when convenient and to be favoured with any account that may be proper to be communicated as to the prospect of the adjustment of our differences with the two great contending Nations.\nI found my family well and my connections generally, but Mrs Taylor. bears the loss of our little son badly, but even better than I expected My brother Hubbards family was well lately.\nWe have nothing new in this quarter. Some people appear to entertain some fears as to Monro, but I cannot say that I can make up my mind on the subject.\nI cannot do less than appologize to you for having given Gen: Carbery a letter of introduction to you. It appeared to be wished & expected and he had frequently spoken so highly of you, that I could not get over it, and many of the Circumstances as to his good wishes towards Burr have come to my Knowledge since that time, and I cannot say that I think he ever took any active part with Burr and again I found the Secy of the Navy placed considerable confidence in him from his letters, which letters I saw. In consequence of one of the Secys letters to Genl. Carbery to go & ascertain where Burr was & his Object, I furnished him with my riding horse at some inconvenience and gave him a letter of introduction to Governor Greenup stating the wish of the Government &c. This was after the Presidents proclamation and while we supposed Burr & his party were at the Mouth of Cumberland. This letter he never delivered and I always suspected him for having his views in it but he did not go to Frankfort. Carbery & my self lived near together & both of our selves & wives were very intimate & even much together. He is a very genteel man & has an amiable wife.\nI never learned a Correct Statement as to his having headed a Mob in Philadelphia till some time last summer. I am of opinion from the manner The Secy of the Navey spoke of him to me that he had changed his opinion of him in some degree. You must pardon prolixity. Mrs. Taylor unites with me in best wishes toward your self &Mrs. Madison, and am with great esteem & respect Your friend & Servt.\nJames Taylor", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-20-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2841", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Shippen, 20 March 1808\nFrom: Shippen, William\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nPhiladelphia March 20th. 1808\nMr. Dallas has shown me at your request the communication of the french police containing a number of charges against Mr. G. Howell. I have examined also his defence which appear to me fully to refute them. From my long acquaintance with Mr. Howell & from my having had moneyd Transactions with him of importance, where delicacy & good faith were never violated I verily believe the charges are groundless. I have the honor to be Dr. Sir very respectfully Your obed. hum Servt.\nW. Shippen", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-20-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2842", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Robert Montgomery, 20 March 1808\nFrom: Montgomery, Robert\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nAlicante 20. March 1808.\nI had the honor of addressing You under the 13th. Jany. a copy of which please find herewith; since that time has been brought in here and detaind by French Privateers the Ship Hibernia, Appleton of Boston for having been spoken in her passage from Tonningen by a British Frigate and the Mercury Bradford of and from Plymouth Massachusetts for having been carried into Gibraltar by a Ship of the line; the papers of each are Sent to Paris for Tryal, where it is apprehended they will remain in that State till the decisive Steps of our Goverment are Known to France; our Commerce is nearly ruind as it is almost impossible for a Vessel to Navigate without being Visited by British Cruisers.\nThe Crews of all detaind Vessels when out of Quarantine become a Charge to Consuls of the respective Ports. I have provided for and Sent home those of the Hibernia, and these of the Mercury will follow by next opportunity. Accts. of my Expenditures with some other charges of postage of letters in the Service of the United States are sent by this conveyance to the department of the Treasury for the amount of which $500.54 I have drawn at sight on the Secretary of that department to Order of Asa Fitch Esqre. which no doubt will meet due honor.\nMy formal Account presented under the 8th. September 1801, amounting to $2238.18, is yet unpaid. I write Mr. Gallatin fully on it. It would be Kind in him and You to Confer, and when You Consider that thirty Years Service without Sallary and without one reproof from you nor Complaint on my I am Convinced You Will think it hard I should give away the Property of my Children to those Who of all the world do not require it, and Who I believe would readily assist So Old and faithful a Servant if he Stood in need or were reduced to Ask it. I only demand what is Justly due me and I hope You will not refuse it. In one time or an other I have been Serving the United States Since the year 177 and in the most disinterested manner.\nA Vessel under Algerine Colours arrived here Yesterday in a passage from that place. She was origionally bound to Majorca and bringing letters here, but the report is that the Dey has given up all the Italian Slaves one of which a Genoes is onboard this Vessel. This circumstance proves that the Algerines have come to the terms of the Emperor of The Portugues Slaves will be the next demanded.\nAlicante\nOn the 18 and 19 Current, a French Privateer called the Jerome captn. Figueri has detaind the Vessels of which you will please find List here with. After a Verbal Process is formed by the Consul here the papers will be Sent forward to Paris for Tryal; the Charges against the Masters of those Vessels is a breach of the first and second Articles of the Decree of Milan 17. December last. There is no doubt they have all come from England altho last from Tanger where they called only for the purpose of changing their papers and if the decree is finally put in force they must be Condemned: in Order to Obviate this misfortune it has been proposed to give a Kind of Bribe to the Captors to release the Vessels without farther delay or tryal; by this means (if it can be acomplished) we have a Chance of sending home about 130 Seamen immediately who by detention must be ruined in this Country. The Ships will make a freight much above the sum paid for their release and will be Kept in imploy without the delay which must necessarily take place in case of tryal.\n26th. March I hand you herewith a Succinct account of a Kind of revolution which has at this moment taken place in this Country Which You may depend and Publish it if you think Proper. I have the honor to be with much respect and Esteem Sir Your Obedient humble Servant,\nRobt. Montgomery", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-21-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2844", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Jacob Ridgway, 21 March 1808\nFrom: Ridgway, Jacob\nTo: Madison, James\nDuplicate\nSir,\nAntwerp the 21st. March 1808.\nReferring to my last respects of the 31st. July 1807 enclosing a report List of the american vessels entered & cleared at this Port up to that period, I have now the honor to transmit you enclosed a duplicate of the same and a subsequent List up to the 31st. of December last.\nNo other american vessel has entered this Port since the 5th. Sepr last, except the brig Ruby of New York Thomas Chapman Master arrived here the 3d. Instant from Rotterdam on ballast. This long interruption of our Trade as well as the discouragement it has met in this Country being the result of the political situation of France & England seems to leave no room to hope for any sudden change. I have the honor to be with great respect Sir Your most obedient humble Servant\nP Jacob RidgwayJ. Robertson", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-21-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2845", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Henry Rose, 21 March 1808\nFrom: Rose, George Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nWashington, March 21st. 1808\nMr. Rose presents his Compliments to Mr. Madison and has the honor to make him his best acknowledgments, for his obliging attention to the subject of his Note of the 19th. instant. He will not fail to profit of the opportunity, which Mr. Madison has had the goodness to procure for him, of being presented to The President of The United States at an Audience of Leave this day at 12 o\u2019Clock.\nMr. Rose begs Mr. Madison will be assured of his distinguished Sense of his Courtesy, and of the Price, he attaches, to the expression of Mr. Madison\u2019s personal Sentiments; the Quarter, from which come, confer a peculiar value upon them, and they afford Mr. Rose a considerable consolation under the painful Sensations, he experiences, and which he would not wish to dissemble, under the failure of the objects of his Mission.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-21-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2847", "content": "Title: From James Madison to James Monroe, 21 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Monroe, James\nDear Sir\nWashington Mar. 21. 1808\nIn the joint letter from you & Mr. P. of October a project on impressments is referred to which does not appear. I forget what passed with you in conversation on the subject. You will oblige me by dropping me the state of the case, and if there be any document in your hands that you will be so good as to forward it or a copy of it. It can if necessary be thrown into the mass which will be before Congs. This will be communicated tomorrow probably and will include the proceedings in the case of the Chesapeak and in relation to the general negociations preceding it. I regret much that you could not afford your aid in selecting from your correspondences, the parts proper for Congs. and the separation of these again into the parts proper & improper for the public at large. I have found the task extremely laborious, and being infirm in health, and otherwise hard pressed on important subjects I have been obliged to let it devolve in good measure on others. You would have executed it with a better appreciation than any of us, of the bearings of many passages, especially on the feelings and way of thinking in the British negociators &c. I am not without fear that errors both of omission & of commission may have happened. I will take the liberty of forwarding by tomorrows mail, a list of the letters from you & Mr. P. joint & several, which have not been allotted for communication & will thank you, if there be any or parts of any which your judgment would have added, that you would note them to me. Occasion perhaps may be found to get them thrown into Congs. before the business be compleated. I wish I could with the same ease, give you a view of the distinction between the parts of the papers communicated; which are confidential within Congs. and which are not so. Yrs. sincerely\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-21-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2848", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Henry Lee, 21 March 1808\nFrom: Lee, Henry\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nAlexa. 21st. March 1808\nI find here considerable distress at the issue to Mr Rs mission. All prospect it would succeed, & that its success would lead to amicable settlement of all our disputes, so that commerce might be resumed, Proving abortive they fear ill humor will overcome & at last war commence.\nThey wait with anxiety to read the correspondence between you & Mr. R. in which they hope to find much disposition to accomodate, on yr. part.\nIn this I tell those who converse with me, they will not be disappointed. Indeed they ought not to be permitted to entertain any doubts on this head, as from what you told me, no doubt can fairly exist. Nevertheless there are some who insist that the disavowal of the King ought to have been adequate ground for revoking the proclamation, especially as its revocation gave success to negotiation which opened the door to arrangements securing the restoration of commerce. I have seen the Kings speech. It is decisive on the point of seamen. It is full of friendly professions. Can any renewal of yr. & Mr. Roses negotiation take place in consequence of it. It would be happy for our Country if you could contrive to restore to her the usual occupations of our people.\nThe King of England Confirms what Mr Monroe has said, namely that had he been left to himself & allowed to treat seperately of the outrage on the Chesapeak, he would have settled it.\nAs to myself, no british vessel can be found, & no american vessel can be procured but by illicit contrivances & to such means, (proud as I am) I cannot resort. The Brazils is the best place for me to go, & if you will appoint a consul there, & he is a good friendly man I could venture with him. Such an appointment being made the P. would be authorized to permit a vessel to convey him to that port, or if you would give to me a letr. congratulating yr. friend on his safe arrival in yr. quarter of the Globe, Such a letr. would authorize the P. to send a vessel with the bearer of the letr. Such is my distressed condition that I frankly expose to you Such ideas as occur to me, favorable to my wishes, hoping that you will if you can aid me in my very painful situation. Yrs. ever\nH Lee", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-22-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2849", "content": "Title: From James Madison to William Pinkney, 22 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Pinkney, William\nSir\nDepartment of State March 22d. 1808.\nMy last bore date the 8th. instant and went by the British Packet. It acknowledged your letters of Novr. 23d. and of Decr. I have since received those referred to in the latter, and also that of Jany 26th. which came to hand last evening.\nI now inclose the promised sequel of the correspondence here with Mr Rose by which you will see the posture finally given to the subject of his Mission. The President lays the whole before Congress this day; together with the Documents containing a full view of the negotiations relating to a general Treaty, as well those conducted by Mr Monroe prior to the joint commission, as those in which you participated. What the impression on Congress will be, cannot be known for some days, and cannot therefore be communicated by the present opportunity, which is furnished by the Politeness of Mr Rose who leaves Washington this afternoon on his return to England. I avail myself of it, however, to add a continuation of NewsPapers which will give you the general proceedings of Congress, and printed copies of Reports &c. connectd with them.\nI cannot add my answer to Mr Erskines communication of the British Orders; the unceasing pressure of other matters on a state of Health still feeble, having thus far delayed it. You will anticipate the complexion which will necessarily be given to it, by the Character of measures, not only violating our Rights, and stabbing our interests; but superadding, under the name of indulgences, a blow at our National independence, and a mockery of our Understandings.\nEvery indication within & without the walls of Congress, shews an increasing determination in support of the Embargo. As long as the question lies between that and an exposure of our Trade to the orders and decrees lying in wait for it, there can be no doubt that the measure will be inflexibly maintained. How long it may be before the question founded on a comparison of the inconveniences incident to a suspension of Commerce, with those incident to a state of war, may be seriously brought forward, is less easy to be decided. If the decision were to be made solely by the Rule of loss and gain, there would at this time be many advocates for it who cannot as yet throw out of the account, considerations of another kind. With great consideration & Respect I have the Honor to be, Sir, Your Mo. Obt Sert\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-22-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2850", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Alexander J. Dallas, 22 March 1808\nFrom: Dallas, Alexander J.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nMr. Howell has requested me to transmit to you, his answer on the subject of the communication, from the Minister of Police, at Paris, to Genl. Armstrong. At the same time, he exhibited to me several papers, with a view to support the facts of his narrative; but of these, I do not think myself warranted in saying more, than that they shew him to have had some business in France; that he was employed in a pecuniary agency, on his return to America; and that the Passport, for his return, corresponds with his statement. I have the honor to be, with sincere respect and esteem, Sir, Yr. mo. obed Servt.\nA. J. Dallas", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-22-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2851", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Valentin de Foronda, 22 March 1808\nFrom: Foronda, Valentin de\nTo: Madison, James\nMuy Se\u0148or m\u00edo: \nPhilada. 22 de Marzo de 1808.\nCon fho. del 1o. de Febrero tube la honra de exponer \u00e0 V. S. la solicitud del Comandante General de las Provincias internas Dn. Nemesio Salcedo, respeto \u00e0 los 21.655, pts. fs. 5. rs. 7 g. que han resultado de gastos hechos por la entrada en los Dominios de mi Rey, qe. hizo Mr. P\u00edke, y su milicia; cuyo origen se evidenc\u00eda por la cuenta adjunta, que se me pide por \u00e8ste Gobierno, en carta del 24. del mes pasado.\nAhora la reclamo nuevamente en virtud de orden de mi Soberano, y n\u00f3 dudo, que su Excella. el Sr. Presidente dar\u00e1 las ordenes de reembolsarme in dha. cantidad.\nComo trato precisamente del Se\u0148or P\u00edke, sobre el que escribi \u00e1 V. S. el 22. de Agosto ult\u00edmo: como han llegado \u00e0 mi Soberano varias noticias, varios papeles, que excitan graves sospechas, segun las reglas de probabilidad, de que la entrada de P\u00edke no fue casual, sino pensada, me previene que ha entregado una nota sobre \u00e8ste asunto al Se\u0148or Encargado de Negoc\u00edos des estos Estados en Madrid y me encarga buelva \u00e1 tocar este asunto Asi no puedo menos de hacer presente \u00e1 V. S. para que se s\u00edrva trasladar \u00e0 la noticia de su Exa. el Sr. Presidente, algunas otras reflexiones, ademas de las qe. tubo el honor de exponer \u00e0 V. S. en carta del 22. de Jun\u00edo en que decia:\n\"Segun las Leyes de las Naciones deber\u00edan haberse tratado al Dr. Robinson y el oficial P\u00edke como Esp\u00edas: Ellos fueron detenidos en un Pays, sobre el que no haya el menor litigio, ni la menor duda, que pertenece \u00e0 mi Augusto Soberano. Es cierto que el oficial aleg\u00f3 que se habian extraviado: la cosa podr\u00eda ser cierta, pero tambien podr\u00e1 ser un pretexto, y la probabilidad est\u00e1 en contra. V. S. sabe que si bastasen semejantes excusas, jamas se podr\u00eda condenar \u00e1 un Esp\u00eda V. S. debe saber que se contradixo P\u00edke en su declarac\u00edon, pues pr\u00edmero no le pertenec\u00eda el Dr. Robinson, y despues declar\u00f3 que le pertenecia.\nLas sospechas contra \u00e9ste of\u00edc\u00edal se aumentaban por haberle encontrado un peque\u0148o d\u00edbujo en un papel roto de terrenos situados entre el Missoury y Santa F\u00e9, con conocimientos adquiridos en dha. V\u00edlla, de su poblacion, comerc\u00edo &ca.\nJunte V. S. \u00e0 \u00e8sto, que el Dr. Rob\u00ednson hab\u00eda penetrado hasta Santa F\u00e9, con el espec\u00edoso pretexto de hacer una cobranza, y supon\u00edendo que era Frances, que habia sal\u00eddo el 15. de Jun\u00edo de 1806. con destino al Pays de los Parranas, para cobrar lo que se le deb\u00eda.\nLa persp\u00edcacia de V. S. no dexar\u00e1 de conven\u00edr con m\u00edgo, que aunque la cosa sea c\u00ederta, tiene todas las apar\u00edencias de un cuento, pues el Doctor pertenecia \u00e1 la part\u00edda de P\u00edke, y el Dr. penetr\u00f3 hasta Santa F\u00e9.\nEstas fueron las reflexiones que tube el honor de hacer presente al Juicio de V. S. el 22. de Agosto ult\u00edmo, para probarle la generosidad y cons\u00edderacion \u00e0 \u00e9stos Estados con que se hab\u00eda conduc\u00eddo el Comandante General de las Prov\u00edncias \u00ednternas del O\u00ebste: y ahora no puedo menos de a\u0148adir \u00e1 V. S. para corroborar mas y mas las graves sospechas que hay de que la entrada no fue accidental, sino de \u00edntento, que en uno de los documentos qe. se encontraran \u00e1 P\u00edke, se habla de Jupiter telescop\u00edos, de sextantes &c: Que en otro buelve \u00e1 hablar de dho. Planeta y de sus satel\u00edtes, y que de repetito sobre M\u00edranda, lo que me hace creer que es una c\u00edfra, que deb\u00eda haber excitado los temores de Dn. Nemesio Salcedo la Astronom\u00eda que despl\u00edega W\u00edlk\u00ednson en sus instrucc\u00edones \u00e0 P\u00edke, pues no pod\u00eda menos de hacer \u00e8ste d\u00edlema; \u00f3 P\u00edke sabe hacer observac\u00edones astron\u00f3micas o n\u00f3: si sabe, no le \u00e8s util la leccion de W\u00edlk\u00ednson: sino ... de nada le serv\u00eda una \u00ednstrucc\u00edon tan somera.\nEn otro documento se observa la se\u0148al siguiente bastante repet\u00edda; lo que \u00edndica que es una c\u00edfra que debe d\u00e1r sospechas; y una c\u00edfra encontrada en las manos de un Xefe, que con var\u00edos Soldados entra en un Pays ajeno, aumenta mucho las sospechas.\nEn otro documento se habla de la pusilanimidad de la Republ\u00edca de Parrana, y al \u00ednstante del Rio Roxo, lo que hace temer que alude \u00e0 la Espa\u0148a, pues es el mismo lenguage que tienen delante de \u00e8sto Gob\u00ederno varios insolentes Gazeteros, sin acordarse que los Romanos llamaban en Pleno Senado \u00e1 los Espa\u0148oles Terror Ymper\u00ed, y que en los tiempos poster\u00edores ha dado tantas y repetidas pruebas de su coraje, y que las dar\u00e9 siempre como ha suced\u00eddo ahora ult\u00edmamente por dos vezes en Buenos-Ayres, humillando el Orgullo Anglicano.\nHay tambien Cavallero Mad\u00edson otros graves mot\u00edvos de quexarse del Teniente P\u00edke y de sospechar su conducta host\u00edl, pues resulta de documentos que poseo, que pidio \u00e1 los Yndios la bandera Espa\u0148ola en camb\u00edo de la que les entregaba de los Estados Un\u00eddos. Luego P\u00edke, me d\u00edce mi Log\u00edca, quer\u00eda separar a aquella Tribu Ynd\u00eda de la Amistad Espa\u0148ola. Es de observar tambien en el documento que poseo, el descoco y baladronada de anunc\u00edarles que desde el a\u0148o siguiente no perm\u00edter\u00eda \u00e0 los Of\u00edc\u00edales Espa\u0148oles les presentasen medallas \u00f2 banderas.\nHay tambien otra baladronada insultiente para la Espa\u0148a, que resulta de los documentos, en que apuesta P\u00edke su vida y honor de que atravesaria con un cuerpo necesario, hasta la Provincia de Nuevo Mex\u00edco, y asegura el buen ex\u00edto. Luego entra la c\u00edfra X. Jo. a; que aunque sea inocente, d\u00e1 que pensar.\nPor una declarac\u00edon de un Soldado de la partida de P\u00edke, resulta tambien que la entrada no fue casual sino espontanea. Consta que hubo Soldados, que hab\u00edendo preguntado \u00e0 P\u00edke donde \u00edban, pues estaban ya en t\u00ederra de Espa\u0148oles, les contextaba que avanzasen.\nQue quando llegaron al R\u00edo de los Parranas el Cap\u00edtan pr\u00edncipal Salltary tenia basada la bandera Espa\u0148ola, y puesta la Medalla con el busto de nro. Rey Carlos IV. por lo que P\u00edke le reprehend\u00ed\u00f3 agriamente, dic\u00edendole no debia tener ni aquella bandera ni aquella Medalla, y que solo deb\u00eda tener la bandera Amer\u00edcana.\nNo expongo \u00e0 la considerac\u00edon de V. S. otros varios hechos que conf\u00edrman las quexas que tiene el Gob\u00ederno Espa\u0148ol contra la conducta de P\u00edke, y que con todo le dex\u00f3 sal\u00edr de sus Dominios, sin haber proced\u00eddo contra \u00e8l, segun exig\u00eda la Just\u00edc\u00eda, y sino se hubieran dado o\u00eddos \u00e0 la generosidad, \u00e0 la beneficiencia, \u00e0 la armon\u00eda \u00e0 las considerac\u00edones que ha tenido tantas vezes mi Soberano con estos Estados. Mas como las grac\u00edas de esta especie no deben repet\u00edrse porque la \u00edmpunidad multiplicar\u00eda los abusos de semejante naturaleza, me manda haga saber \u00e0 este Gob\u00ederno, come lo verif\u00edco \"que si se rep\u00edt\u00edesen \u00edguales excesos, se proceder\u00e1 contra los Ynfractores con el rigor prevenido por las Leyes.\" D\u00edos gue. \u00e0 V. S. ms. as. B. L. M. de V. S. su mas atento Servidor\nValent\u00edn de Foronda", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-22-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2852", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Anonymous, 22 March 1808\nFrom: Anonymous\nTo: Madison, James\nA Letter Addressed to the Hon. James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States. Printed in America. 1808.Sir,post 22 Mar. 1808\nAmong the Documents accompanying the President\u2019s Message, of the 22d of March, is a Letter, of the date of the 5th of the same month, addressed to the Envoy Extraordinary of His Britannic Majesty, and subscribed with your name. It is to a reconsideration, of the very important contents, of that letter, that I respectfully call your attention.\nMr. Rose had informed you, by letter of the 26th of January, that \u201che was expressly precluded, by his instructions, from entering upon any negotiation, for the adjustment of the differences arising from the encounter of His Majesty\u2019s ship, Leopard, and the frigate of the United States, the Chesapeake, as long as the Proclamation, of the President of the United States, of the 29th of July, 1807, should be in force.\u201d\nIn reply, you observed, to Mr. Rose, that \u201cThis demand might justly suggest the simple answer, that before the Proclamation of the President could become a subject of consideration, satisfaction should be made, for the acknowledged aggression, which preceded it;\u201d subjoining, \u201cthat this was evidently agreeable to the order of time, to the order of reason, and it might be added, to the order of usage, as maintained by Great Britain, whenever, in analagous cases, she has been the complaining party.\u201d\nIt is to be presumed, that you regard the order of time as a consideration wholly unimportant; and that you are willing to rest all the merits of the question, upon the order of reason, and the order of usage.\nWith respect to the order of usage, you appear satisfied to take it, \u201cas maintained by Great Britain.\u201d\nI omit, in this place, the remaining member of the sentence, because, as to \u201canalogous cases, in which Great Britain has been the complaining party,\u201d neither my own memory, nor your research, have been able to discover any.\nIt is true, indeed, that in a subsequent part of your letter, you have cited certain passages of British history, of which it is to be presumed, that they are the analogous cases referred to. I address myself, however, to your understanding, and not without some confident hope, of being able to convince you, that the supposed analogy does not exist; and, that so far as the \u201corder of usage, as maintained by Great Britain, in analagous cases,\u201d can constitute a rule of action, that rule is in express contradiction to the argument which you have proposed to yourself to maintain.\nOf the three examples, which you have adduced, there are only two, in which Great Britain was the complaining party.\nOf the two, the first appears to be without the slightest bearing, on the point in controversy:\n\u201cThus,\u201d you relate, \u201cin the year 1764, Bermudians and other British subjects, who had, according to annual custom, taken possession of Turk\u2019s Island, for the season of making salt, having been forcibly removed, with their vessels and effects, by a French detachment from the island of St. Domingo, to (of) which Turk\u2019s Island was alleged to be an appurtenance, the British Ambassador, at Paris, in pursuance of instructions from his government, demanded, as a satisfaction for the violence committed, that the proceedings should be disavowed, the intention disclaimed, orders given for the immediate abandonment of it, on the part of the French, every thing restored to the condition in which it was, at the time of the aggression, and reparation made, of the damages which any British subjects should be found to have sustained, according to an estimation, to be settled between the governors of St. Domingo and Jamaica. A compliance with the whole of this demand was the result.\u201d\nHere, we have an example, of violence disavowed, of damages repaired, and of pretensions disclaimed, in favour of Great Britain, the complaining party; but, what has this to do, with the refusal to recall the President\u2019s Proclamation? How can this be received as an analogous case? To have rendered it analogous, Great Britain, before she made her demand on France, must have issued something analogous to the Proclamation, she must have refused to withdraw that something, analogous to the Proclamation, and France must have complied with her demand, notwithstanding such refusal.\nThe second example, in which Great Britain was the complaining party, is that of Falkland\u2019s Islands. I shall quote, at length, your narrative of this affair:\n\u201cThe case, which will be noted last, though of a date prior to the case of Nootka Sound, is that of Falkland\u2019s Islands. These islands lie about a hundred leagues eastward of the Straits of Magellan. The title to them had been a subject of controversy, among several of the maritime nations of Europe. From the position of the islands, and other circumstances, the pretensions of Spain bore an advantageous comparison with those of her competitors. In the year 1770, the British took possesion of Port Egmont, in one of the islands, the Spaniards being at that time in possession of another part, and protesting against a settlement by the British. The protest being without effect, ships and troops were sent from Buenos Ayres, by the governor of that place, which forcibly dispossessed and drove off the British settlers. The British government, looking entirely to the dispossession by force, demanded, as a specific condition, of (for) preserving harmony between the two Courts, not only the disavowal of the Spanish proceedings, but that the affairs of that settlement should be immediately restored to the precise state in which they were, previous to the act of dispossession. The Spanish government made some difficulties; requiring, particularly, a disavowal, on the part of Great Britain, of the conduct of her officer, at Falkland\u2019s Islands, which, it was alleged, gave occasion to the steps taken by the Spanish governor; and proposing an adjustment, by mutual stipulation, in the ordinary form.\n\u201cThe reply was, that the moderation, of His Britannic Majesty, having limited his demand to the smallest reparation he could accept, for the injury done, nothing was left for discussion, but the mode of carrying the disavowal and restitution into execution; reparation losing its value, if it be conditional, and to be obtained by any stipulation whatever, from the party injured.\n\u201cThe Spanish government yielded. The violent proceedings of its officers were disavowed. The fort, the port, and every thing else, were agreed to be immediately restored to the precise situation which had been disturbed; and duplicates of orders, issued for the purpose, to the Spanish officers, delivered into the hands of one of the British Principal Secretaries of State. Here, again, it is to be remarked, that satisfaction having been made, for the forcible dispossession, the islands lost their importance, in the eyes of the British government, were in a short time evacuated, and Port Egmont remains, with every other part of them, in the hands of Spain.\u201d\nI am equally at a loss, on this, as on the former occasion, to discover the analogy pretended, and which should show, that the \u201corder of usage, as maintained by Great Britain,\u201d supports the President\u2019s refusal to recall his Proclamation. I recur, for the present, to the second of your three analogous cases, but in which, in point of fact, Great Britain was not the complaining party:\n\u201cAgain: in the year 1789, certain English merchants having opened a trade at Nootka Sound, on the North West coast of America, and attempted a settlement at that place, the Spaniards, who had long claimed that part of the world as their exclusive property, dispatched a frigate from Mexico, which captured the two English vessels (that were) engaged in the trade, and broke up the settlement on the coast. The Spanish government was the first to complain, in this case, of the intrusions committed by the British merchants. The British government, however, demanded, that the vessels, taken by the Spanish frigate should be restored, and adequate satisfaction granted, previous to any other discussion. This demand prevailed; the Spanish government agreeing to make restoration of the captured vessels, and to indemnify the parties interested in them, for the losses sustained. They restored also the buildings and tracts of land, of which the British subjects had been dispossessed. The British, however, soon gave a proof of the little value, they set on the possession, by a voluntary dereliction, under which it has since remained.\u201d\nThe first proposition, of the truth of which I wish to satisfy your mind, is this, that neither of the three cases have the required analogy, so as that they can be regarded, as testifying the \u201corder of usage, as maintained by Great Britain,\u201d to be in favour of the President\u2019s refusal to withdraw his Proclamation.\nIt will hereafter be my business to call on you, to confess, from what source the difficulty, of finding analogous cases, springs. I shall call on you to confess, that the Proclamation is a measure analogous with nothing upon record; and a blunder, such as could hardly have been expected, from the least informed of statesmen.\nIn order to show the want of analogy (such as you desire) in the several cases, present to our minds, I must intreat your patience, while I retrace their history.\nIn the year 1764, the French committed an aggression upon Great Britain. Upon suffering this aggression, did Great Britain do any thing analogous to the publication of the President\u2019s Proclamation? Did she do any thing analogous to the refusal to recal the Proclamation? You must allow, that she did not; and, then, the whole of the story is this, that France committed an aggression; that Great Britain demanded satisfaction; and that France accorded it.\nIn 1770, Spain committed an aggression upon Great Britain, in that she used violence toward British subjects. On this occasion, did Great Britain do any thing analogous to the President\u2019s Proclamation? Certainly, she did not. You relate, that she confined herself to requiring, that satisfaction should be given to her.\nIn 1789, certain British subjects, (or, if you please, Great Britain) committed, what Spain regarded as an aggression. On this occasion, did Spain follow the decorous example which had been set for her? Did she do nothing analogous to the late conduct of the President of the United States? Did she abstain from every thing, injurious to the feelings of the Power, which she called the aggressor, as Great Britain had abstained before? She did not. Like Great Britain, she complained of the violence which she had suffered; but, unlike Great Britain, while she complained, she struck; she returned violence with violence; and audaciously presumed to imagine, that Great Britain would stammer out an apology, while a cane was laid across her shoulder!\nIn 1807, a British officer (or, if you please, Great Britain) committed violence upon the United States. What was the conduct of the United States, the complaining party? Did it present a case analogous, to that of either of the cases in which Great Britain, was the complaining party? Sir, your clear discernment, your good sense, your love of truth, the courage with which you dare avow it, all compel you to declare, in spite of what you have hastily advanced, that it did not; that you can discover no analogy: IT PUBLISHED THE PROCLAMATION; it set itself to injure the interests and the feelings of the aggressor; it returned violence, with violence; coercion, with coercion. It laid a cane across the shoulders of Great Britain, and then asked her to apologize. It called upon her for the conduct of a dastard, while it filled her ears with the words, magnanimity and honourable sentiments!\nI persuade myself, that it is impossible for you to continue to see any thing, favourable to the President, as to the point before us, in the \u201corder of usage, as maintained by Great Britain, whenever, in analogous cases, she has been the complaining party.\u201d In the cases adduced, there is nothing analogous, except in the existence, of violence on one side, and of complaint on the other. In the \u201corder of usage, as maintained by Great Britain, as a complaining party,\u201d it appears to me impossible, that you can find yourself able to say, that there is any thing to maintain the analogy; impossible, that you can hesitate to confess, that that order of usage has not been so very opposite, as wholly to remove the cases specified, out of the list of cases analogous.\nBut, if you never intended to assert this analogy; or, if you now retract the assertion, let me ask you one further question. Is there not such analogy, between the several cases, of 1764, 1770, 1789 and 1807, as presents clearly to your view, an \u201corder of usage, as maintained by Great Britain,\u201d whether complainant or complained of; I say, an order of usage, the precise opposite, of that ascribed to her, in your letter, addressed to Mr. Rose?\nDo you see no analogy, between the conduct of Spain, in 1770 and 1789, and that of the United States, in 1807?\nDo you see no analogy, between the conduct of Great Britain, in 1770 and 1789, and that of the same Power, in 1807?\nAnd, lastly, do you see no analogy, between the conduct of Great Britain, in 1764, and that, which might have become the United States, in 1807; and do you see, in that conduct, of 1764, no example of the real order of usage, as maintained by Great Britain, as a complaining party?\nTo present these analogies, and this real order of usage, the more distinctly to your mind, I shall avail myself of the organ of the eye. I proceed to arrange, in corresponding columns, the corresponding particulars, of the affairs of 1764, 1770, 1789 and 1807.\nFrance committed violence upon Great Britain.\nGreat Britain did nothing analogous to issuing the Proclamation.\nGreat Britain, as a preliminary step, confined herself to demands of satisfaction.\nCertain English merchants obtruded themselves into a territory, called Spanish.\nThe Spanish government forcibly dispossessed them.\nSpain complained.\nGreat Britain refused to do any thing, in the matter complained of, till the forcible dispossession should have been remedied.\nThe King of Spain complied.\nGreat Britain succeeded, in her efforts, to restore harmony, between herself and Spain.\nThe British took possession of Port Egmont.\nSpain dispossessed them.\n\u201cThe British government, looking entirely to the dispossession by force, demanded, as a specific condition, to (for) preserving harmony between the two courts, not only the disavowal of the Spanish proceedings, but that the affairs of the settlement should be immediately restored to the precise state in which they were, previous to the act of dispossession.\u201d\n\u201cThe Spanish government made some difficulties.\u201d\n\u201cThe Spanish government yielded.\u201d\nHarmony was restored.\nGreat Britain committed violence upon the United States.\nThe United States issued the Proclamation.\nThe United States did not, as a preliminary step, confine themselves to demands of satisfaction.\nA frigate of the United States suffered violence from a British officer.\nThe President issued the Proclamation.\nThe United States complained.\nGreat Britain refused to do any thing, in the matter complained of, till the Proclamation should have been recalled.\nThe President refused.\nGreat Britain failed, in her efforts, to restore harmony between herself and the United States.\nThe British attacked the Chesapeake.\nThe President issued the Proclamation.\nThe British government, looking entirely to the Proclamation, demanded, as a specific condition, for preserving harmony between the two countries, (not the disavowal of the President\u2019s proceedings) but that the affairs of the two countries, previously to discussion, should be restored to the precise state in which they were, before the date of the Proclamation.\nThe President made some difficulties.\nThe President did not yield.\nHarmony was not restored.\nIt ought to be unnecessary for me to spend further time, in attempting to make it manifest, that no similarity is to be found, between the order of usage, maintained by Great Britain, as a complaining party, and that of the United States, as a complaining party; and that there is the most entire similarity, between the conduct of Great Britain, constituting her order of usage, as seen in 1770, 1789 and 1807. That with the case of 1807, as it respects the British order of usage, there is no analogous case whatever; that the order of usage, actually followed by the President, is that of Spain, in 1770 and 1789; and, that it was only by abandoning that order of usage, that Spain found herself enabled to return into harmony with Great Britain. On the whole, therefore, that that order of usage, which you have supposed to be the one maintained by Great Britain, is, on the contrary, an order of usage upon which she has never acted, and to which she has never submitted. You appeal, somewhere, to her consistency. You see, to what her consistency must reduce you.\nI close this branch of my argument. I assume to have demonstrated, that the \u201corder of usage, as maintained by Great Britain,\u201c is against you. It is, now, my duty to inquire, for what you have to hope, from the order of reason.\nWhatever may be the \u201corder of usage, as maintained by Great Britain,\u201d it has in it nothing conclusive. You are not bounden by it. You are not bound to assent to it. If it had been in your favour, so much the better; but, your great appeal is to the order of reason.\nThe order of reason, according to you, requires, that satisfaction for the violence, committed by Great Britain, should precede the cessation of consequent violence, on the part of the United States. You think it reasonable, that retaliating violence should continue, so long as the original violence remains unatoned for. You speak of England, as the original aggressor, and must therefore intend to distinguish her from the secondary aggressor; meaning, the United States.\nIn detecting your mistake, as to the order of usage, I felt more securely than I can boast to do, in the success of any attempt to change your ideas, as to the order of reason. Usage depends upon facts; and it has been sufficient for me to cite your own facts, and your own statements of those facts. Reason is not so fortunate. It is at the pleasure of every man, to give the name, of reason, to any thing that he will.\nForbearing, therefore, to enter into any discussion, as to what is, or is not, the order of reason, I shall confine myself to asserting it, such as I believe it to be.\nI believe it to be the order of reason, to pursue some integral rule of action; to avoid the intermixture of things different in their nature; to settle our choice, between one system and another; and not to take up the second, together with the first.\nWhen we suffer injury, and when two modes of reparation are open to us, it becomes us to adopt the one, and to reject the other. We have our choice, between seeking it from the voluntary act of the party injuring, and seeking it with our own hands.\nBringing the order of reason into political practice, I can think of nothing more obvious, than that it can never be amicably required, of any Power, to make reparation for its original aggression, after the sufferer has committed a secondary aggression, and before such sufferer has made reparation, for such secondary aggression. Till this be done, the two aggressors are on equal terms; for, it is only by abstaining from secondary aggression, or by repairing it, that the original sufferer can acquire any claim, on the party originally injuring. If I offend a man, he is not to knock me down, and then appeal to my good will for reparation; but, he is either to appeal to my good will, or he is to knock me down, without making the appeal: or, at least, he is to resort to the first, before the second.\nBut, to illustrate, by example, the order of reason, it may be sufficient to recur to the order of usage, such as you show it to be, in the conduct of Great Britain. That order, though it has been disregarded by the President, appears to have your fullest approbation; and, perhaps, we shall agree, in pronouncing it to be consonant with the order of reason.\nIt is not, however, on the supposed consonance, of the President\u2019s conduct, with the order of usage, nor with that of reason, that you entirely rely. You undertake to \u201cmeet the explanations of Mr. Rose, with such a Review, of the whole subject, as will present the solid grounds on which he (the President) regards such a demand (the recall) as inadmissible.\u201d\nWith whatever facility you may have been fortunate enough to find yourself capable, of connecting this review, with the proper subject-matter of your letter, I confess myself wholly deficient, in any kindred happiness.\nIf, indeed, I were to look solely to the review, my understanding would be less bewildered. I should there distinctly learn, that the Proclamation having been occasioned by unnumbered aggressions, on the part of Great Britain, and the reparation being offered for one aggression only, it was not to be admitted, that even the fulfilment of that limited reparation, could give a claim to the recall of the Proclamation. All this, whether or not I approved of it, I should understand; but, when I find, toward the close of your same letter, an offer to recall the Proclamation, after, or when, satisfactory reparation, though thus limited in its object, shall have been made, I am, again, altogether embarrassed. Your explanation, as I am aware, is this, that the reparation, for the Chesapeake, would be taken as a pledge for the rest; but, can you find any argument, creditable to yourself, why you should not regard the mission of Mr. Rose, the offer of reparation, and the disavowal of the act of violence, as pledges, as trust-worthy as that with which you propose to be content? Moreover, the whole doctrine, of pledges, is out of the question; because, as we have seen, the \u201corder of usage, as maintained by Great Britain,\u201d and the order of reason, require, that the party, making reparation, shall be under no coercion. To be under pledge, is to be under coercion.\nUnconnected, therefore, as I find the review, with the refusal to recall the Proclamation, I cannot consent, nor can I contrive, by any optical art, to look at the two subjects as one.\nThe issuing of the Proclamation was one measure, and the refusal to recall it was another; and, however easy, for the vulgar, it may be, to blend their respective merits, you will not refuse, within the walls of the cabinet, to consider them apart. You will admit, that the one might be very right, while the other was very wrong.\nYour review consists in a detail of aggressions, on the part of Great Britain. I propose to receive that detail, precisely as you give it. I cavil with no single phrase. I take it, for argument sake, as entirely true, and incapable of favourable explanation. What, then, does it amount to? It amounts to this, that in return, for the sum of British aggression, the President had justifiably resorted to aggression on his part. This, too, I may freely admit. He had a right to do so. He had a right to do so, because it was competent to him to return aggression for aggression. But, you perceive, Sir, we are but where we were; we cannot get away from the single question, whether or not Great Britain ought to abandon, in favour of the President, that order of usage which is observed in the several examples heretofore cited, and which order of usage you appear to regard as running parallel with the order of reason? Your review informs us why the Proclamation was issued, but leaves us wholly in the dark, as to why it was not recalled.\nBut, though I cannot unite the two subjects, the Publication and the Recall, I am not unwilling, as a separate topic, to take up the gauntlet, which you throw down, as to the merits of the Publication.\nI admit, as before, in a general way, all your charges against Great Britain; but I contend, that they afford no defence of the Proclamation. They might justify any paper addressed to the court of London, or to all the courts of Europe; they might justify any system of policy to which the President might incline; but they cannot justify the act of publishing the Proclamation.\nTo judge truly of the Proclamation, we must consider it in more than one point of view. It is an instrument too interesting, and too novel, not to deserve our pains. It is unique, in the catalogue of state-papers.\nSo far as the Proclamation is an act of hostility, against His Britannic Majesty, I shall not call it censurable; because it is the essential prerogative, of every government, to commit hostilities upon whom it will, and because the general question of right and wrong, between Great Britain and the United States, forms no part of my present inquiry. My sole business is, to show, that it was upon mistaken principles alone, that the demand, of Mr. Rose, was not complied with.\nBut, when we consider the Proclamation, under any other form, we ought to be equally astonished, at the matter and the manner. At the manner, because, among other informalities, it is addressed to nobody; at the matter, because of the unheard-of stretch of authority which it assumes.\nUpon reading the Proclamation, we ought to confess, that we find in it, for the most part, only a loose narrative, told to the winds; for no one is called upon to listen. Toward the conclusion, there is one exception, of inferior moment, to the truth of this remark.\nI shall not accuse the author of the Proclamation of any sinister motive, because I observe the other Proclamations of the President to be equally informal, in their language. They are all loose narratives, addressed to nobody.\nBut, were there not this apology, some suspicion might attach; for, in the present instance, it is very essential to be informed, who were the persons intended to be addressed.\nA Proclamation is a paper, which, in its nature, can be addressed only to those who owe allegiance and submission to the authority whence it springs. Of the justice of this definition, the President appears to have been not unaware; and, therefore, though he confessedly desires to coerce subjects not his own, to command those who could not be bound to obey him, to assume military authority over the naval arms of His Britannic Majesty, he refrains from addressing himself to such subjects, and persons bearing the arms of the King. He confines himself to a narrative, addressed, as I presume that I ought to suppose, to the people of the United States, and relates, to them, or to somebody, that he has strong causes of complaint, against His Britannic Majesty, and that, in consequence, he has forbidden the coasts and harbours, of the United States, to the Navy of that Prince. In the subsequent paragraphs, he pursues the legitimate object of a Proclamation, commanding certain persons, whose duty it is to obey him, to do, or not to do, certain things.\nWas it expected, that the naval commanders of His Britannic Majesty would conform themselves to the line of conduct hinted at in this paper; or, was it reckoned upon, that their necessary disregard, of the Proclamation would furnish a new subject of complaint? Assuredly, the former; assuredly, the President did believe, that he had the right of issuing orders to His Britannic Majesty\u2019s Navy; he did believe, that that Navy was held bound to render him obedience.\nBut, what could possibly have put such a notion into his head? What dream of despotism could have suggested it? Is there no limit to the power of the President of the United States? Can he alike assume the rod over Judges, in his Messages; over Traders, in his Letters to Governors; and over Foreign Forces, in his Proclamations?\nNever, Sir, was so gross a blunder! I call upon you, to show me its parallel. I call upon you, to show me one instance, in which a potentate has ventured to issue a Proclamation, to be obeyed by subjects not his own. I must allow myself to add, that the following sentence, in your letter to Mr. Rose, alluding to the conduct of the British officers, subsequent to the date of the Proclamation, is unworthy of your pen: \u201cHow far it (the Proclamation) has received, from those, whose intrusions it prohibited, the respect due to the national authority, or been made the occasion of new indignities, needs no explanation.\u201d The intrusions, to which you refer, it is not competent to the Proclamation to prohibit; and the Proclamation has become the occasion of new indignities, only through the fault of publishing it.\nI repeat, that as an act of hostility, against His Britannic Majesty, I make no complaint of the Proclamation. It is against giving that act of hostility the form of a Proclamation, and giving it the form of this Proclamation, that I protest; a form, not more intolerable, as it respects the Court of London, than discreditable, as it respects the United States. Intolerable, as it respects the Court of London, because it assumes command over the Naval Force of Great Britain; discreditable, as it respects the United States, because it breathes a desire of despotism the most unmeasurable, and is, at the same time, an assumption of authority, without the power to enforce it.\nThere is but one further point, upon which we need an explanation. Do you allow the publication, and the maintenance, of the Proclamation of the President, to be hostilities, or, do you not? If you do not, suffer me to ask you, whether you regard them as measures of coercion, and as amounting to a forcible dispossession of the British Navy, of the coasts and harbours of the United States? If you should think the Proclamation, by itself, a very harmless thing, you will recollect a certain and curious act of Congress, for carrying the Proclamation into effect, and then give me an answer to the question.\nIf it was intended, that the British commanders, upon learning, from the narrative, called a Proclamation, and apparently addressed to the people of the United States; I say, if it was intended, that the British commanders, upon learning, as by-standers, that they were said to have been forbidden to remain in the harbours of the United States, should slip their cables, and make sail, was not the thing, intended, as completely an act of coercion, a forcible dispossession, as if, with somewhat more manliness of demeanour, the President had sent them orders to depart?\nWill you deny, that the thing intended was a forcible dispossession? Was it not intended to command? Is not to command, to compel? Is not compulsion force? In short, if forcible dispossession was not intended, why was the language of authority substituted, for that of entreaty? With what apology was it expected, that the British commanders should go home, and meet an inquiry into their abandonment of the service? Surely, when they were asked, why they departed, they were to have replied, that they were forced, compelled, commanded. That they were either destitute of the power, or that they had judged it inexpedient, to resist.\nExclusively, therefore, of the error fallen into, when the President, by his Proclamation, undertook the command of the British navy, in as much as he undertook to command, where imperious duty forbade obedience; exclusively of this, and from the premises which this affords, you cannot but see the intolerable nature of the transaction, as it respects the interests and feelings of His Britannic Majesty. The King of Great Britain judges it expedient, that his fleets should station themselves along the coasts of the United States. The President causes those fleets to depart. Undoubtedly, the President has a right to do so; but he cannot do so, and at the same time affect to have committed no act of hostility, against the King of Great Britain.\nIf we look to the effect of the proceeding, on the feelings of His Britannic Majesty, we see, at once, on the one side, its impropriety, not to say, its vulgar insolence; and, on the other, the strait path of propriety. We see that it belongs, to every potentate, to be the sole commander of his own forces, and, in that quality, to be the director of all their own motions, and of all their actions. Every other potentate and power may rightfully take offence at the motions or actions of those forces, but never can assume command over them.\nThe President, feeling as he does toward His Britannic Majesty (and the justice of those feelings is not in dispute) might rightfully have adopted any other measure than that which he has chosen. He might have requested, or required, of the King of Great Britain, that he should withdraw his naval forces, from the coasts and harbours of the United States, or from any other part of the world, in which he was offended by their presence; and, upon the refusal or neglect of the King, or, without condescending to request or require, he might have used all his means for accomplishing a forcible dispossession; but, to assume command over those forces, was equally faulty and ridiculous.\nI have done with the merits of the Proclamation. If I have shown, that its publication was improper, I have afforded an additional argument, in favour of its recall. This is the only object for which, at this time, it can be worth while to look back to it. For the rest, it is important only to the political reputation, of the authority whence it came. It is not for its absurdity, nor for its indelicacy, but for its hostility, that it commands attention.\nIt scarcely deserves to be repeated, that the Proclamation ought never to have been published. It is enough, that we become convinced, that before His Britannic Majesty can offer reparation for the affair of the Chesapeake, it must be recalled. It must, because it is in the order of reason, and the order of usage, as maintained by Great Britain, that it should. The Proclamation is an interdict, a forcible dispossession; and we have seen, in your own words, what order of usage has been maintained by Great Britain, in analogous cases. In 1770, as you tell us, \u201cThe British government, looking entirely to the dispossession by force, demanded, as a specific condition, of (for) preserving harmony between the two courts, not only the disavowal of the Spanish proceedings, but that the affairs of this settlement (Port Egmont) should be immediately restored, to the precise state in which they were, previous to the act of dispossession.\u201d \u201cTHE SPANISH GOVERNMENT YIELDED.\u201d Now, the analogy of the case consists in this, that to restore things to the precise state in which they were, previous to the act of dispossession, the Proclamation, the interdict, the act of dispossession must be recalled. Great Britain, less strict than in the former case, does not demand a disavowal of the proceeding.\nSir, if there be reason in what I have advanced, permit me to suggest to you, how little weight is due to the observations which follow, and which you will perceive to be cited from the recent publication of Mr. John Quincy Adams:\n\u201cThe great obstacle, which has always interfered, in the adjustment of our differences with Britain, has been, that she would not acquiesce in the only principle, on which a negotiation, between independent nations, can be conducted, the principle of reciprocity; that she refuses the application, to us, of a claim which she asserts for herself. The forcible taking of men, from an American vessel, was an essential part of the outrage upon the Chesapeake. It was the ostensible purpose, for which that act, of war unproclaimed, was committed. The President\u2019s Proclamation was a subsequent act, and was avowedly founded upon many similar aggressions, of which that was only the most aggravated.\n\u201cIf then, Britain could, with any colour of reason, claim, that the general question of impressment should be laid out of the case altogether, she ought, upon the principle of reciprocity, to have laid equally out of the case, the Proclamation, a measure so easily separated from it, and, in its nature, merely defensive. When, therefore, she made the repeal of the Proclamation an indispensable preliminary, to all this discussion, upon the nature and extent of that reparation, which she had offered, she refused to treat with us upon the footing of an independent power. She insisted upon an act of self-degradation, on our part, before she would even tell us, what redress she would condescend to grant, for a great and acknowledged wrong. This was a condition which she could not but know would be inadmissible, and is of itself nearly conclusive, that her cabinet never intended to make, for that wrong, any reparation at all.\u201d\nYou will pardon me, if I attempt to place, in the same point of view, the following extract, from your own letter:\n\u201cThe President, having interposed this precautionary interdict, (the Proclamation) lost no time, in instructing the Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States, to represent, to the British government, the signal aggression, which had been committed on their sovereignty, and their flag, and to require the satisfaction due for it; indulging the expectation, that His Britannic Majesty would at once perceive it to be the truest maganimity, as well as the strictest justice, to offer that prompt and full expiation, of an acknowledged wrong, which would re-establish, and improve, both in fact and in feeling, the state of things which it had violated.\n\u201cThis expectation was considered, as not only honourable to the sentiments of His Majesty, but as supported by known examples, in which, being the complaining party, he had required and obtained, as a preliminary, to any counter complaints whatever, a precise replacement of things, in every practicable circumstance, in their pre-existing situation.\n\u201cThus, in the year 1764, Bermudians,\u201d &c. &c.\nThere remains but to consider practically, the argument which I have held. Its validity, I submit, with deference, to your judgment. Its use, you will permit me to bring into view.\nIt is not for me to know, in what degree, the most satisfactory reparation, made for the affair of the Chesapeake, would restore harmony between the two countries. I can only venture to judge of it, from your own words. You have spoken of \u201cfull and prompt expiation, of an acknowledged wrong,\u201d on the part of His Britannic Majesty, as capable of \u201cre-establishing, and improving, both in fact and in feeling, the state of things which it (the acknowledged wrong?) had violated.\u201d\nHowever inconsistent the deduction may be, with the language which you hold, when defending the Proclamation, and however inconsistent with the terms of that Proclamation, I am obliged to suppose, that the \u201cstate of things, both in fact and feeling, which was violated by the acknowledged wrong,\u201d was a state of good understanding, between Great Britain and the United States.\nIt appears, therefore, that a prompt and full expiation of the acknowledged wrong, on the part of His Britannic Majesty, would have filled the measure of the desires of the President. Now, that His Britannic Majesty made an offer of prompt expiation, will never be denied. Whether it was a full one, remains questionable, only because that it was thought necessary, by this government, to refuse the recall of the Proclamation.\nThe refusal to recall the Proclamation, may, therefore, be the only cause, why the state of things, violated by the acknowledged wrong, has not been re-established and improved! Such is the responsibility which hangs, upon the policy defended in your letter, and such is the importance of examining into foundations of that policy!\nIn discussing this question, I pass over a variety of subordinate points, in regard to which I might take exception. I refrain from all observations on the primary causes of discussion between Great Britain and the United States. I limit myself to a single topic, the failure of His Britannic Majesty\u2019s attempt, to offer a prompt and full expiation for an acknowledged wrong.\nIf you should agree with me, that, upon reflection, the Proclamation ought never to have been published, and that its recall, when asked for, ought not to have been refused, you will doubtless join with me, in regretting, that the letter of Mr. Rose was not received with joy, as affording a fortunate opportunity for such recall, without the appearance, in the eyes of the multitude, of treading back the path of error. It was, indeed, an opportunity, the good fortune of which ought to have been perceived! It held out, to the President, the means of repairing a great fault; and the mob would have thought it very reasonable, that the Proclamation should have been issued, at the moment of aggression, and recalled at that of proffered reparation. It might exultingly have said, \u201cSee the effects of the President\u2019s Proclamation! Mr. Rose is come; and, now, the Proclamation may be recalled. It has done its business.\u201d This opportunity has been lost.\nIt is, in truth, deserving of observation, that from the day of the attack on the Chesapeake, the United States have suffered a series of losses, in their character and interests. Whatever may be the merits, in sober argument, of their quarrel with Great Britain, they had, on that day, the vantage-ground. Had the President, then, with the penetration of the Irishman, in the play, discerned that the quarrel, as it stood, was a \u201cvery pretty quarrel,\u201d and that it ought to be his first concern, not to run the risk of \u201cspoiling it,\u201d much might have been expected. But, he has spoiled it. It is no longer a \u201cpretty quarrel.\u201d The good sense and dignity of the United States have been compromised, and the quarrel must be continued, as long as they are disposed for it, and ended, not how they will, but how they can. The President\u2019s error has changed the probabilities of success, and given the vantage-ground to Great Britain.\nBut, what is past, is past; and we must, now, look to the future. It would have been the better, if the Proclamation had never been published; it would have been the better, if it had been recalled, without refusal; but, placed as we are, it must be recalled afterward. The sacrifice of personal vanity is an evil, but the sacrifice of national interests and happiness is a greater. \u201cThe Spanish government yielded,\u201d and so must this. After all, the acknowledgment of error is not, to enlarged minds, so painful, as little ones suppose.\nWhen I say, that the Proclamation must be recalled, I always mean that it must be recalled, if the dispute with Great Britain can be settled without warfare.\nSir, if I have the right side of the argument, the line of conduct, presented to you, is obvious. As a Minister of State, you will not lend the aid or sanction of your talents, or station, to mistaken measures. You will magnanimously renounce an opinion, which you may discover yourself to have adopted only through haste or passion. You will not suffer your country to be a permanent sufferer, by your moments of inadvertence.\nAbove all, if your partizans should succeed in placing you, where, as it is understood, you desire to be placed--in the chair of Government--you will instantly abjure the steps of your predecessor. Nay, to revive the hopes, and invite the confidence of the country, you will publicly pledge yourself to the reversal of his policy.\nBut, if you feel that you cannot rise to this; if you feel, that, after the publication of your letter of the Fifth of March, you cannot stifle inferior feelings, even by the might of the great ones, of patriotism and honesty; if you cannot abjure the faith, for which you have preached, two places of refuge are still left you, the one, in your conduct, the other, in your heart. You can voluntarily fly, from the field in which you may perceive that you cannot do your duty; or, you may hope, not to be permitted to enter it: you can publicly renounce your desire to become President of the United States; or, you can fervently pray, that the election may not fall upon you.\nConduct, the features of which are so serious, would not be necessary, if the follies of statesmen were merely subjects of laughter, and if to analyse them were merely a diverting recreation. But, in a statesman, a misconception, or a bad syllogism, is often of more evil to his country, than a bad harvest. It ruins, it murders thousands; it distresses millions. Look at the United States. Look at the sufferings of the people. Look at their privations and anxieties! Look at the farmer, stripped of his profits--and of his farm! Look at families, stripped of their beds, and in difficulties for food! Look at lands and houses sold, to satisfy, in part, the creditors of honest and industrious men! Look at honest and industrious men, on the brink of loss of property and credit, and whose fate depends upon the accuracy of your reasoning, and the rectitude of your proceedings! Look at these things, reconsider your steps, and do that which you believe to be right!\nI hold in too much contempt, the philosophy, which obtains among your friends, to charge upon cabinets or statesmen those private afflictions, which result only from necessary public measures; but the calamities of a people, and the welfare of a state, constitute an urgent claim on deliberation, demand reiterated revisions, engage humanity in their cause, and, by the immensity of their magnitude, render in the last degree diminutive, every thing, less than themselves.\nThese, Sir, are reflections which I do not assume to offer, either to your head or breast, as strangers there. When I indulge myself in expressing them, it is only in my solicitude to secure a serious hearing, on a question which so seriously regards yourself and country. I have the honour to be, &c. &c. &c.\nJames Madison, Esq.Secretary of State.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-22-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2853", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Valentin de Foronda, 22 March 1808\nFrom: Foronda, Valentin de\nTo: Madison, James\nMuy Se\u0148or mio:\nPhiladelphia 22 de Marzo 1808.\nAl vea que V. S. no me contesta \u00e1 la Carta que le dirigi hace un mes, he creido que se ha extraviado: asi tengo la honra de copiarla nuevamente hoy 22. de Marzo, y dice as\u00ed.\nLeyendo anoche la Gazeta de Relf, se detubo mi atencion en este periodo de un bill presentado par el Sor. Campbell: \"Between the District of Mobille, &a. Any of the other Ports of the United States, although loaded at the Town of Mobille or its vecinity on its passage.\"\nAunque doy \u00e1 estas frases su verdadero sentido, como podria entenderse tambien que la Mobilla se contaba entre los Puertos de los Estados Unidos, pues el que quisiera decirlo baxo de semejante frase, podria expresarse del mismo modo, espero que S. E. el Se\u0148or Presidente, tendr\u00e1 la bondad de convenir en que el periodo no tiene el sentido de comprender la Mobila entre los Puertos de la Jurisdiccion de los Estados Unidos. Dios gue. \u00e1 V. S ms. as. B. L. M. de V. S. su mas atento servidor\nValentin de Foronda", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2854", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Albert Gallatin, 23 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Gallatin, Albert\nSir.\nDepartment of State, March 23. 1808.\nI have the honor to request that you cause the sum of Thirty five thousand dollars, (out of the foreign intercourse fund) to be placed in the hands of the Bankers of the United States at Amsterdam, as well to repay their present advances to the Ministers of the United States in Europe, as to satisfy such dfts, as may be made upon them, on the same account, in the course of this year. The said Bankers to be charged accordingly, and held accountable. I am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-23-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2855", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Thomas Appleton, 23 March 1808\nFrom: Appleton, Thomas\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nLeghorn 23d. March 1808.\nOn the 19th of January an embargo was laid on all Vessels in this port, except the french. About 15 days since the spanish vessels were suffer\u2019d to depart, and in the course of the last week the Neapolitans were free to sail. With respect to ours, notwithstanding my repeated applications and remonstrances to the french authorities, I could obtain no other satisfaction, than that such were their instructions, and that no latitude was allow\u2019d them to modify their orders. In the commencement of the embargo I wrote M\u2019r Armstrong at Paris, requesting from him any information he might have received, as to the cause, or probable duration of it. Yesterday I receiv\u2019d from him the copy of a letter he had obtain\u2019d from Mons: Decres minister of marine: the purport of which is, that there was no embargo laid on American vessels, and that if any of ours were detain\u2019d, it must have arisen from a false interpretation of the order of his majesty. Immediately on receipt of which, I dispatch\u2019d an express to Mons: Dauchy the administrator General of Tuscany at florence, Conveying to him a certified copy of the Same; and this morning our vessels are free to depart. It is very Certain, that the order of the Emperor did not express neutrals, on which my continual remonstrances were founded; but the french consul repeatedly Assur\u2019d me that his instructions from the department of State, specified the vessels of all nations with whom they were in amity and alliance, or neutrals. There are many reasons to induce me to beleive, that the whole evil has arisen from an error made by the person who transcrib\u2019d the letter in the department of State; for I understand no embargo has been laid on our vessels in Marseilles; and certainly, they have been free to depart from all the other ports of Italy. As the present is the first direct Conveyance from hence in the present year, I avail myself of it to forward you a list of vessels Sail\u2019d from this port during the year 1807. and likewise my account of disbursements to distress\u2019d Seamen, with their attendant vouchers; by which you will observe, Sir, that the amount receiv\u2019d by me for Seamen discharg\u2019d, and afterwards return\u2019d to the U: States, considerably exceeds the Sum expended for the releif of Sick and distress\u2019d men who have fallen to my hands from the various Seales of the Levant.\nFrom the period of the departure of the late Queen, to the present time, it has not been announc\u2019d, nor can the intentions of the Emperor Napoleone respecting Tuscany, be precisely discover\u2019d; for, whether it is to be united to the Empire, or form of itself a Seperate Kingdom, is still as problematical, as at the first moment the french authorities enter\u2019d the territory: however, all public acts are issued in the name of the Emperor, and a french administrator-General directs all the departments of State.\nTuscany tho\u2019 but of Small extent of territory yet contains immense public wealth, which will of course devolve to the new Sovereign: by the sales of certain church-lands, and in the abolishing an order of Knighthood, the latter of which will furnish about six millions of dollars, while the former will produce at least three times that Sum. The french authorities now govern the papal dominions nearly in the Same manner as those of Tuscany; and the Pope I believe is entirely confin\u2019d to the Spiritual concerns. For the rest of Italy it remains undisturb\u2019d from the enemies without, or from any internal commotions. The fleet of 11 sail of the line and 10 frigates which Sail\u2019d some time since from Toulon, has, we are inform\u2019d arriv\u2019d at Corfou; and should a junction be made with the two russian Squadrons in the archipelago, and black-Sea, it will together form So powerful aforce, as must compel the british, either totally to abandon the mediterranean, or to draw from the chanel-fleets such additional aid as will necessaryly weaken many important Points of defence. Today a Prefect for this part of Tuscany is arriv\u2019d, and on the 1st. of may the Napoleone Code is to take effect throughout the Kingdom. This is an event I am well persuaded will infinitely tend to the real happiness ofthe country; for the mild and lenient laws establish\u2019d by Leopold are found totally insufficient for the subtle genius of the italians. On the whole the dominion of Napoleone Cannot fail ultimately to ameliorate the situation of the Tuscans. The Sale of church-lands, will be only of such, as would be better lopp\u2019d off, than retain\u2019d. They will make soldiers of those who are now vagabonds, they will introduce a Code of efficient laws, instead of a system of jurisprudence which they now labour under, which neither defends life nor property for the parricide, and the paltry theif have no other difference in their punishments, than in the term of its duration: and even this, is so mild that they often regret it is at an end, while the Civil administration is so bad, that it cannot degenerate. I have the honor with the highest respect Yr. Mo. Ob Servt\nTh: Appleton", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2856", "content": "Title: Notes on Jeffersons Message, 24 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: \nca. 24 March 1808\nincapable of giving a valid consent to their alienation; in others belong to persons who may refuse altogether to alienate, or demand a compensation far beyond the liberal justice allowable in such cases. From these causes the defence of our sea board, so necessary to be pressed during the present season, will in various ports be defeated, unless a remedy can be applied. With a view to this I submit the case to the consideration of Congress, who estimating its importance & reviewing the powers vested in them by the Constitution combined with the amendment providing that private property shall not be taken for public use, without just compensation, will decide on the course most proper to be pursued.\nI am aware &c\n(for consideration) As the Constitutionality will be much agitated, it is doubted whether a precise opinion on that or the legal process--be eligible", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2857", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Robert Smith, 24 March 1808\nFrom: Smith, Robert\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nNavy Department 24 Mar. 1808\nBy a letter addressed to me by Col. Wharton, I perceive that the services of all the officers in the Marine Corps are now necessary. He wishes to be informed how he is to consider Mr. Coxe one of the Lieutenants of Marines, now consul at Tunis, and that I may be enabled to give to Col. Wharton the necessary information upon this subject, I ask the favor of you to inform me of your intentions with respect to Mr. Coxe. I have the honor to be with great respect Sir, yr. mo ob. Servt.\nRt. Smith", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2859", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Fulwar Skipwith, 24 March 1808\nFrom: Skipwith, Fulwar\nTo: Madison, James\nParis 24 March 1808\nI have the honor to transmit herewith a list of the vessels, as far as my information reaches, that have been either arrested or captured, under the Decree of his Majesty the Emperor & King, and are detained in the ports of France, Spain, Italy & Holland. It is to be presumed that few or none others can be likely to fall into the same predicament, as long as the present Embargo in the United States continues in force. It is impossible to say when those captured or sequestered will arrive at a decision either by the Council of Prizes or the Government. In the meantime however it seems probable that leave will be granted generally to the consignees to dispose of their Cargoes upon their entering into Bond with approved Securities for the Amounts; whilst the Vessels will remain sequestered as they are; those at least are the provisional regulations just adopted by the Council of Prizes with respect to the Caliope & her Cargo, as will be seen in the Copy of their decision here annexed. I have the Honor &ca.\nFulwar Skipwith", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2860", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Tench Coxe, 24 March 1808\nFrom: Coxe, Tench\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nPhiladelphia Mar. 24, 1808\nThe great importance of the present crisis occasions me earnestly to wish for a copy of the report on our external relations, which is understood to have been recently communicated, as soon any spare ones may be recd. from the press, and be permitted to circulate among our citizens. I beg the favor of your desiring one of the gentlemen of the Department to cover one to me.\nTho it is perfectly clear to many federal gentlemen that the Embargo is a wise measure, and tho it is manifest that the intensions of British & French antineutral regulations would render it highly imprudent to go to sea, if there were no Embargo, yet the seriousness and consequent capacity of dangerous perversion of that measure renders it prudent to keep it under unceasing attention and consideration.\nIf we have a million of Tons of Shipping including coasters and fishing vessels. They at $45 P Ton are worth\n$45,000,000Our exports were last year108,000,000$153,000,000If our imports were108,000,000then business to the Amount of $261,000,000\nis shortly to be arrested by the embargo, except the coasting trade & fisheries. It seems wonderful that we endure so well the part, which has taken place: and it seems highly prudent, in every way we can, to endeavour to employ men, skill, industry and capital by new plans of business. Improvements and manufactures invite our most serious consideration. I have the honor to be, dear Sir, yr. respectful hum. Servant\nTench Coxe", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2861", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Louis ([Lewis?] Formon, 24 March 1808\nFrom: Formon, Louis ([Lewis?]\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nPoint Peter Gpe. 24th. March 1808\nMy last respects to you, were under date of the 10th. January last, Since which I have been honored with your letter of the 28th. November 1807, covering authenticated documents to prove the citizenship and Identify the person of Samuel Gossage, an American Seaman detained here, on board of the Prison Ship. Previously to the receipt of that letter, he had been released, on my application, and Sailed for Newyork on board of the Ship Peter, Roberts Master. I have to inform you that since the carteels between this and the british islands have been again put in activity, a convention has been agreed upon, that accounts Should be respectively Kept for each man\u2019s diet, at So much per diem. This necessitates from my part, to pay to the treasury, for each man claimed and delivered up, the amount of his account of diet for the time he has been detained. I Suppose it to be agreeable to your intentions.\nJames Gallasby, an american Sailor, possessed of a protection Granted on the 28th. day of May 1807, by Wm. Brown esqre. Collector of the district of Missisipi, had been left at the hospital of Point Peter destitute of every Support and assistance: Capn: Chrystie, of the Ship Washington of Newyork, gave him a passage in his vessel, and I granted him a Supply of Cloths according to bills &.\nLewis Harvey, a young man belonging to Newport R. I. was on board of the prison Ship, and having no protection, I was, to j his citizenship, obliged to take the affidavits of all the persons then in this place, belonging to Newport. I obtained his release, paying the actual customary Charge of the amount of his account of diet: he Sailed for Newport on board the Schooner William & Mary a Linden Master.\nOn the 7th: February last, arrived here with his crew, Capn. Ths. Tiner, formerly of the Ship Robert Bolton, belonging to Mr Wm. Mien of Savannah Georgia, which vessel, Foundered at sea on the 10th. in latitude 27.10 Long. 37. on her passage From to Savannah. The said master and his men, Fifteen in number, embarked in the longboat, Kept the For twenty eight days, and on their Landing here Applied to me for a Supply of diet, Cloths &c. Having verified that they were deprived of every Support, I paid the master the sum of ninety Dollars, according to receipt.\nThe embargo laid, in America, on all the ports of the Union, has thrown this island in the most desperate Situation: provisions of all Kinds are absolutely not to be found at any price, while colonial produce lays without Sale. From what informations, I had from the neighbouring islands, they are all in a like situation. The surprise of Marie Galante (a dependency of the Guadeloupe Government) by a british Squadron, occasioned a proclamation from the Governor, ordering this island in state of Siege. A new proclamation has just been issued, to the effect of opening all the small ports of the island to neutral vessels, and declaring, under certain restrictions, all articles of provisions, free of the customary import duty. I take the liberty to inclose to you, a copy of this last proclmn.\nThe Ship Northern Liberties, of Newyork, John Clough master, and the Cargo, have been since 3 or 4 months under seisure, and are now under adjudication. The ground of Such an extraordinary proceeding is this: Capn. John Clough Sailed in August last From Point Peter For Newyork in the Ship Julia Ann, whereof he was then Commander. A very Strict law prohibits the taking away of any man who is not Furnished with a passport From Government. The Julia Ann being under Weigh, and in calm, about 6 or 7 miles From the Harbor, a man without being taken notice of, got on board From a Fishing boat, which pulled off immediately: and he declared he was going a passenger in the Vessel. The Capn. was, it appears, by Forcing circumstances, namely the presence of an english Cruizer which very Soon after, boarded him and ordered him to Antigua, obliged to Keep him. On his return here in the Ship Northern liberties, the Ship and Cargo have been libelled, and are now condemned, while the Captain is always confined on board the prison Ship. I have as much as I could do with propriety, applied to Government for his release, but yet without Success: I expect though I Shall get him off. With a high Consideration, and great respect I remain, Sir Your most respectful obt. Servant\nLs. Formon", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-24-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2863", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Maury, 24 March 1808\nFrom: Maury, James\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nAmerican Consulate Liverpool 24th. March 1808.\nI have the honor to inclose you a Copy of the Protest of Charles Remington, late Master of the American Brigantine Vesta & of William Phillips & Edward Munro, Mariners, stating the capture of this Vessel by the British Privateer Lancashire Witch & the names of the Crew taken out of the Vesta & put on board the said Privateer. I have the honor to be With perfect respect Your Mo Ob Servt.\nJames Maury", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2864", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Louis ([Lewis?] Formon, 25 March 1808\nFrom: Formon, Louis ([Lewis?]\nTo: Madison, James\nSir!\nPoint Peter Gpe March 25th. 1808\nThe foregoing is a copy of my last respects to you, since which nothing new has occurred here; a very Strict blockade of the island Continues from the part of the British, but the Colony is on a footing not to leave the least apprehension of an outward attack.\nHerewith inclosed I have the honor to transmit to you, my account of disbursements, for the Months of January, February & March 1808; each item Supported by Satisfactory vouchers, and the account amounting to 160.3/ 100 Dollars. For reimbursement thereof I have taken this day the liberty to draw on you, favor Joseph Daraguy at 15 days Sight, and request you would be so good as to have it forwarded after acceptance to Joseph D\u2019araguy Esqr. Newark (New Jersey.). I remain with a high Consideration and great respect Sir, your most respectful very Humble Servant\nLs. Formon", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2865", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Jarvis, 25 March 1808\nFrom: Jarvis, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nSan Lucar 25th. March 1808\nNotwithstanding the advice of the very extraordinary change which has recently taken place in the fortunes of the Prince of Peace will probably reach you through various other channels I could not deprive myself of the opportunity of the Brig Maria, to communicate such reports as have reached here & Cadiz on the subject. It is said that about eight days since there was a Council of State held to determine whether the King ought not to quit Madrid & retire to Seville on the approach of the French Army. The Council Generally was in favour of the King\u2019s Stay, the Prince of Peace for his going. At length the latter accused one of the most determined & influential of the Council who was in favour of the King remaining, of Treachery, who answered that if there was any traitors in the Council it was the Prince of Peace himself. The King then took a decided part with those of the Council in favour of his remaining & immediately deprived the Prince of Peace of all his honors & employments & banished him to any town of Spain to which he should please to make his residence. Report however says, that afterwards an order was issued to confiscate all his property & imprison him, whereupon he attempted to escape with his Brother attended by his guards; that a body of the Kings troops were sent after him & a contest ensued, in which his Brother was Killed, 19 of his guards & himself wounded & made prisoner and that he has been confined to a prison. It is beleived that the Emperor was not averse to his fall.\nThere is now a body of fifty thousand French troops in Spain, & it is said that double the number is expected. It is supposed that a considerable body will be Stationed at Madrid. The speculations are various as to the actual object of the Emperor, but as they are all unsatisfactory & contradictory, I shall not venture to trouble you with them.\nI return to my post to morrow.\nThe Embargo at home will cause great distress in this Peninsula, particularly in Portugal for Bread Stuffs. With perfect Respect I have the honor to be Sir Yr Mo: Ob: Servt.\nWm. Jarvis\nAccompanying this will go, a packet from the American Consulate at Cadiz, in which is inclosed a letter from Mr Erving. It is just reported that the King has resigned his Crown, that the Prince of Asturias is proclaimed King.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2866", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Francis Armstrong, 25 March 1808\nFrom: Armstrong, James Francis\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nTrenton March 25. 1808\nSuffer for a moment an old collegiate acquaintance to intrude and solicit the interest of the Secretary of state in advocating an application which he is making for a Captaincy of Infantry for his Son. The necessary recommendations will be forward by the Governor of this state to Genl. Helms to be laid before the proper department. May I not confidently appeal to Mr. Madison, that my revolutionary services, justify my application? A rheumatick complaint of many years continuance, & of unusual severity has almost cut off my intercourse with the world, and compelled me to expend that patrimony which I wished to have preserved for a dear family. This circumstance had often almost constrained me to lay my situation before the Secretary of State, to see if haply some humble appointment might be made for me, as there can be no doubt but all the pains & infirmities which I have experienced have been the consequence of my exposure to wet & dry, to heats & colds during our revolutionary war. To no person would I sooner make application for my self than to Mr. Madison, should our common country confer on him its administration, to which he has so fair a claim, & of which the prospects are so flattering. In the mean time Mr. Madison, I trust will excuse the liberty I take in troubling him with the present application. I will look with confidence his influence & interest as far as they are consistent with his views & his Situation. With much esteem & regard I am Sir, your obedient Servant\nJames F. Armstrong", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-25-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2868", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George W. Erving, 25 March 1808\nFrom: Erving, George W.\nTo: Madison, James\nNo. 42.Duplicate.Sir,\nBy the report of the Spanish official as published in Madrid Gazette, which was referred to in the last post dispatch, No. 41., it appeared that the Grand Duke of no positive orders to pass thro\u2019 Madrid with his troops if it should be found necessary to do so, yet that they would not in accord with the Spanish Government, &ca. &ca. on the night of the 22nd., the Grand Duke arrived at San Martin, within half a league of this City, & on the 23rd. entered Madrid with near 20,000. men, some Regiments of horse, which have arrived with other detached parties yesterday; make the total about 24,000; & there are about 12,000. more at the Escorial. It was conjectured that this unexpected movement, would change his Majesty\u2019s purpose of coming to Madrid: yesterday morning however, pursuant to the notification mentioned in my last, he reached Madrid: he entered, contrary to custom, on horseback, dressed in the uniform of, & accompanied by the guards du corps, & surrounded by the whole body of grandees: he was received with the general acclamations of immense crowds, who thronged the streets in his way to the palace.\nThe former King & Queen were left at Aranjuez, from whence, in a few days, they go to Badajos.\nThe fair prospects which are opening for this Country, under the Reign of a King so universally beloved, & so well disposed, which the first acts of his administration have so strongly encouraged, are very much clouded by apprehensions on the side of France, founded not merely on the sudden entry of her troops but on the language & conduct of the Grand Duke, since he has been here.\nHow this may be approved of by the Emperor, whose arrival within two or three days is now officially announced, remains yet to be seen; but certain it is, that the behaviour of the Grand Duke amounts not only to a dissatisfaction with all which has passed, but an absolute refusal to recognize his present Majesty and there are no slight grounds for apprehending that his intention is to protect the Prince of Peace & to reinstate the King. Hence, as what was apparently the first object of the Emperor has been effected by the people, it is supposed that the ground is changed, & that something more extensive is to be such plea as the late transactions may furnish; if this be so, the misfortunes of this people, are not at an end. I have taken perhaps the most exaggerated statement of the french force here & in Portugal, when I put it in my last letter at 250,000. it is evident that great pains are taken to conceal the exact fact; but no opinion states it at less than 150,000.\nI have the honor herewith to inclose copy of Mr. Cevallos\u2019s communication respecting the abdication of the late King, of my answer; and of his note respecting his own continuance in office; on which I have merely returned him the usual complimentary felicitations. With sentiments of perfect Consideration & Respect, Sir, Your very obt. hble Servant\nGeorge W Erving\nP. S. I have to day had the honor to receive the triplicate of your dispatch, dated October 18th. it was sent to me from Lisbon, whither it had been transmitted from Tangiers.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-26-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2869", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Lee, 26 March 1808\nFrom: Lee, William\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nBordeaux March 26: 1808\nI have the honor to transmit you a dispatch from General Armstrong, and to inclose you the Imperial Decree creating a new nobility with a tremendous one against the Jews. Both are thought necessary by the nation and appear to be highly approved of.\nNotwithstanding our vicinity to Spain we are as totally in the dark respecting the destination of the immense army which the Emperor still continues pouring into that country as you can possibly be at Washington. The news of the day is that the King of Spain with the advice and consent of the French has abdicated his throne in favor of the Prince of Asturias his eldest son who has caused to be arrested the Prince of Peace. The Emperor is said to have past through this last incognito, but our reports are so various that no reliance can be placed on them. Among other things it is rumoured that the Toulon and Rochfort fleets have been defeated by the English after having landed a body of troops in Sicily.\nWe have as yet no decision of the Council of prizes on the numerous vessels detained under the Imperial Decrees. An impression is gaining ground both here and at Paris, that the Emperor is dissatisfied with the length of our parley with England, of course the greatest anxiety prevails among the Americans. Those who can leave the Country are hurrying away; and those who remain behind are securing their property. Some of us are not without hopes that the wisdom of our government will direct us clear of a contest with either, and that the Embargo will be continued until our differences with both shall be adjusted by negotiation.\nAccompanying this you have a file of papers from which but little can be gleaned and nothing learnt of the distresses of the people of Europe. From the Baltic to the Archipelago, nothing but despair and misery is to be seen. Grass is growing in the streets of this City. Its beautiful port is totally deserted except by two Marblehead fishing Schooners and three or four empty Vessels which still swing to the tide. Let those who thirst for war for conquests, dominion and glory come here and learn a lesson. With great respect I have the honor to remain Your obdt. & devoted Servant\nWm. Lee", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-26-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2870", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Monroe, 26 March 1808\nFrom: Monroe, James\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nRichmond March 26th. 1808\nI had the pleasure to receive yesterday your favor of the 21. instant. I have examined since, all my papers & cannot find a copy of the project of the article relative to impressment which Mr. Pinkney & I presented to Mr. Canning after the rect. of your insructions by Mr Purviance for the correctness of which I can vouch. I presume it was the same in effect, with that which we presented to the British Comrs. in Novr. 1806, of wh. a copy was as I presume forwarded to you with our letter of the 11th. of that month. I transmit you a copy of that project, which I believe to be correct, tho\u2019 I am sorry to own that even in respect to it I cannot be positive, as it is not noted to be a copy of that project. It corresponds however in all circumstances with the explanation given of it in our letter of Novr. 11. & with my recollection of its contents. Should a copy have been sent with our letter of Novr. 11. & shod. it differ from this, it will of course be preferr\u2019d to it. I send you a copy of the alterations which we proposed to the treaty after the rect. of your instructions by Mr Purviance. I send also the two papers which you forwarded to me after my return from Washington. You will be so good as to return them to me at your leisure.\nI am persuaded that the more comprehensive the submission to Congress is, of the documents appertaining to the late negotations with G. Britain, the better the effects will be. I am not aware they contain any thing with which the British comrs., or the friends of Mr Fox, or those who were parties to the negotiation before him, (shod. it be deemed proper to go back so far), ought or would be offended. The greatest delicacy was observed in all the communications to you, of what occurrd in the negotiation in every stage towards all the parties to it. I endeavoured on my return from Washington to draw a line between what shod. be communicated & what withheld & found that it was extremely difficult to do it, on any consistent principle. I suggest this only as a general idea. On receiving the list wh. you promise I will endeavour to render you all the aid in my power, to enable you to supply any thing that may be wanting.\nI am very sorry to hear of your indisposition but hope that you have before this recoverd from it. I am \nDear Sir yr. friend & servant\nJas Monroe", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-26-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2871", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Armstrong, Jr., 26 March 1808\nFrom: Armstrong, John, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nParis 26 March 1808.\nMy last letter was of the 15th. inst. and sent by the Ship Arno of New York. As in that I sent copies of several notes written to the Department of foreign affairs, merely to shew the nature of our complaints against this Government, so it may be proper to send you a copy of the answers I have received to some of these notes. It is observable that those of the 19th. & 20th. inst. (the one informing Mr. Champagny of the arrival of the certificates of Origin, for want of which certain confiscations have been made at Hamburg, the other demanding that means be taken for the discharge of vessels seized contrary to the provisions of the two Imperial decrees) have not yet been answered. When they are so, we Shall know whether this career of 1422 901. 821. 720. 1433.\nhas any connexion with political views of principles of any kind?\nA report prevails that the french army has entered Madrid; that the populace of that place had been excited to demand of the King whether he meant to abandon his people? and (as the means of doing away all Suspicion on that head) to invite him to Madrid. It is added that he accepted the invitation, and is now a prisoner to his own subjects in his own capital. This measure, though useless with regard to Spain, was necessary with regard to the colonies. Like Cesar\u2019s will in the hands of Anthony, he may be made to say any thing his Keepers please. I have the honor to be, Sir, with very high Consideration, Your Most Obedient Servant\nJohn Armstrong.\n Note (30 March) You will find a copy of a letter to M. de Champagny under this date, in answer to mine of the 19th. With regard to the other, I have received the following note. \u201cM Godin (min. of finance) says, that the Emp. has so explained himself on the subject of the Sequestrations, that it would be useless to speak more of it at present. He will not therefore make the projected report.\u201d", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2872", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Jacob Ridgway, 27 March 1808\nFrom: Ridgway, Jacob\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nAntwerp 27th. March 1808\nThe annexed is a Duplicate of my last Letter of the 21st. Jany. to which is added a Duplicate Report List of the American Vessels entered and Cleared at Antwerp from the first July up to the 31st. December last. With the Greatest Respect, I have the honor to be Sir Your most obedient & most Humble Servant\nPpor. Jacob Ridgway Esqr.J: Robertson", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-27-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2874", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Joy, 27 March 1808\nFrom: Joy, George\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nLondon 27 March 1808\nThe Document called for by Lord Holland and referred to within has not come to my hands, and I believe therefore it is not yet before the Lords. It would be useful in shewing how far the defalcation in Trade is owing to late measures, by distinguishing the falling off in the last quarter of 1807 compared with the corresponding Quarters of 1805 & 6; but this would appear trifling compared with the present quarter, when the Clerks of the Custom House are quite unoccupied. I shall endeavour to procure this last, as soon as it can be had, by requesting some friend to move for it, if not done without, shortly after the 5th. prox:. Mean time I hand you the Bill wch. passed the Lords 2 Nights ago, An Accot: of Imports & Exports, and an Accot: more interesting to us of the Real and another of the Official Value of those between GB. and the U. S. and rest very truly, Dr. Sir, Your friend & Servt:\nGeo: Joy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2875", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Robert Dickson, 28 March 1808\nFrom: Dickson, Robert\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nGothenburg 28th. March 1808.\nI had the Honor of addressing you on 10th: Decemr. informing of the death of Mr. David Airth who acted here as Vice Consul on the full power of the late Mr. Robert C. Gardiner of Rhode Island, and on 8th. Jany. inclosing a Report of the Trade of the United States to this Port for last Year, a Duplicate of which I herewith have the Honor to inclose.\nThis Government on 11th. Currt. published a Decree allowing the Importation of all kinds of Colonial and Manufactured Goods by English and Neutral Vessels to the port of Gothenburg only, & there to be laid up on Transit by paying a Duty of 1/2 PCt. ad valorem; the only articles therefore prohibited here, are Tea & Nankin, which the East India Company have the exclusive privilege of importing.\nInclosed I have further the honor to hand you a Table shewing the Expence of Quarantine, and another of the rates of Pilotage, Beacon Money, and other port Charges paid by Swedish, American, and Vessels of other Nations, by which you will find our Vessels to be more favored than any other foreigners. The Import & Export Duties on Goods by our Ships are also much in our favor; Thus a foreign, Vessel pays 40 PCt. additional Duty, while ours only pay 10 PCt. For the present however and untill Six Months after the conclusion of Peace, all Vessels are put on the same footing as Swedish.\nThis Country if the War continues, will undoubtedly be distressed for Provisions, and the only place it can now receive Supplies from being the United States. I have made application to the King thro\u2019 the Governor of this City to allow the Importation of Flour, Beef & pork from the United States free of Duty, which I have Sanguine hopes of being granted.\nWith regard to Politics, the King is determined to make a vigorous resistance, to the combined power of France & Russia. He has caused to be enrolled every man in the Country betwixt the Age of 18 and 25, and they are to be embodied about the Middle of this Month. He has collected an Army of 15000 men on the Borders of Norway seemingly destined to the invasion of that Country. He has equipped his fleet consisting of 10 Sail of the Line, with about 20 Sail of Frigates & Smaller Vessels, and it is expected that all the Ports of the Baltic will be declared by him in a State of Blockade. This goes by the Brig Aidas, which is ready to proceed first fair Wind to Newburryport. Should anything interesting occur, before her Departure, I shall not fail to inform you thereof as also the Success of my application. I am with the highest Respect Sir Your Most obedient humble Servant\nRobt. Dickson", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2876", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Tobias Lear, 28 March 1808\nFrom: Lear, Tobias\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nAlgiers, March 28th: 1808.\nI have the honor to enclose triplicate of my respects to you of the 4th. of January, and duplicate of that of the 9th. instant, together with the Schedule of my accounts with the United States. Since forwarding the Originals of these letters I have heard nothing respecting the U. States, excepting by a letter from Mr. Montgomery, our Consul in Alicante, that an embargo had been laid on all Vessels in the Ports of the U. States.\nIt is with regret I have to inform you that our affairs here wear a different aspect from what they did, when I had last the honor of writing to you.\nOn the 16th. instant the Dey sent me a message by my Drogerman, that I should pay immediately sixteen thousand dollars for eight of the subjects of this Regency, said to have been destroyed on board the American Schooner Mary Ann, captured some time since by one of his Frigates, as mentioned in my former letters. I returned for answer, that I had not yet received any authentic advice of this business, and could, therefore could say nothing about it. The Dey then sent me word that he would wait the arrival of the Courier from Alicante, by which I might receive some information. But, on the 24 (the Courier not having yet arrived) the Drogerman informed me that the Dey had sent for him, and ordered him to tell me, that if I did not pay the money before night, I should be sent to prison in Chains. I ordered him to return immediately to the Dey, and say that I could not pay the money, without the Order of my Government, as it was an affair out of the usual course of my business here, and that I was ready to meet the event. He brought me word that the Dey would see me next day, at noon; on the subject. He accordingly sent for me at noon, on the 25th. When I entered the Palace, I met Mr Ulrick, the Danish Consul, who was descending from an audience of the Dey. He was seized by a Choux, who carried him through the streets in the most indignant manner, to the Slave-prison where he was loaded with an enormous Chain. The reason assigned for which was, that he had been called upon for his Biennial present which he declared he could not make without having time given him, as the Vessel containing it, and Annuities for the Regency, had been taken by the English\nOn meeting the Dey he demanded from me immediate payment for the persons before mentioned; together with an additional two thousand dollars for the Boy said to have been carried in the Schooner to Naples.\nI told him, with firmness, that I could not pay it without the order of my Government, as it was an extraordinary case, and requested time to write and receive an answer: but was answered, that if it was not paid immediately, I knew what the Consequence would be. I replied, that let the consequence be what it might, I should not pay it. I was then ordered to leave his presence. On descending to the Area of the Palace, where the Danish Consul had been seized; I expected the same compliment which he had met with, and was prepared for it. But finding no one to molest me, I left the Palace and returned to my own house; where I supposed the Orders would be sent to have me arrested; but the day passed without my hearing anything more of the matter. In the evening I met the French and Swedish Consuls (the others being at their Gardens) and we agreed to send for the other Consuls the following morning, to concert measures for the liberation of the Dane. At noon we met at the Danish Consul\u2019s House, with our respective Drogermen, and proceeded to the Palace, where we had an audience of the Dey, who, after some conversation, agreed to release the Danish Consul from his Chains, at the intercession made for him. From thence we went to the Marine, where the Consul had been sent to work with the other Slaves (carrying a chain of 40 weight) to receive and conduct him to his house. While we were with the Dey, on the business beforementioned, he asked me, in presence of the Consuls, if I did not intend to pay the money. I answered him as I had done the day before; to which he made the same reply; and I remain in daily expectation of experiencing the effects of this refusal, which is dictated by a sense of duty and a conviction that the honor of my Country demands such conduct from me. I make no comment on the unpleasantness of my situation. My Government and my Country will consider it, and do what is right respecting it.\nAs it is very likely that the Cruizers which are now fitting out, will have orders to capture American Vessels, I have written to our Consul in Alicante, by this opportunity, which is unexpected and the only one likely to occur soon, to convey notice to all the Consuls of the U. States in this sea, to guard our Merchant Vessels against the evil which may occur. A Copy of my letter to him, I have now the honor to enclose.\nIn consequence of the barbarous outrage which has been committed on the Danish Consul, and threatened to be put in execution against me, the Consuls have been brought to reflect, on their precarious situation here; and I trust, that in a few days there will be a compact entered into among us, that we shall use our best endeavours to enforce that Article which exists in all the treaties between this Regency and Christian Powers, securing the person & family of the Consul from violence and outrage, in consequence of anything he may do in the exercise of his official functions. And I hope each one will bind himself not to do any act, as a public Agent, while any one is held in or threatened with durance vile. Our respective Governments I trust will sanction such a measure, and give orders to their Consuls accordingly.\nNotwithstanding all I have stated, it is possible that the Dey might not proceed to extremities towards me; or commit hostilities on our Commerce and Citizens, until I can hear from my Government on the Subject. But I have thought it my duty to guard as much as possible against the evil, by giving notice to our Vessels which may be in this sea; as well as those in the Atlantic; for at present there is nothing to prevent their Cruizers from passing the Straits.\nThe Camp is expected to march in a few days against Tunis, and their Cruizers are said to be intended for that quarter. But there is no doubt but that some of them will cruize in various parts of this Sea, and some proceed into the Atlantic.\nI am pressed to finish my letter, as the Vessel is on the point of sailing; and after her departure the Port will probably be shut until the departure of the Cruiziers. With sentiments of the highest respect and most sincere attachment, I have the honor to be, Sir, Your most faithful & Obedt. Sert.\nTobias Lear.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2877", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Monroe, 28 March 1808\nFrom: Monroe, James\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nRichmond March 28. 1808.\nI omitted to state in my letter of Saturday last that the copy which I then sent you of a proposition, which Mr Pinkney & I presented to the British comrs. relative to impressment which was mentioned in our letter to you of Novr. 11th. 1806. and which, as I believe, we afterwards renewed to Mr. Canning, was a copy only of the amendment which we offered to your original project: you will I presume understand my communication in the sense in which it is now explained; I hasten however to give the explanation to prevent any misconception in the case. I hope you have recovered your health. I am Dear Sir sincerely yours\nJas Monroe.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-28-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2878", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Julius Oliver, 28 March 1808\nFrom: Oliver, Julius\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nMarseilles 28th. March 1808.\nI have the honor to Inclose you a Package from Consul Lear, at Algiers. It has been tore at the Lazaretto, in deeping it into vinegar & in putting Sticks Through it, to let the Vinegar Circulate.\nMr. S. Cathalan has gone to Bordeaux for a few days & is to write you from there, he having taken with him the Sundry Statements of the Vessels\u2019 arrivals & Departures &c.\nWe have in this Port Eight american Vessels, five of which are Sequestered in pursuance of the imperial Decree of the 17th. December last. I have the Honor to be Sir Your most obedt. & Hble. Servt. \nIn absence of the AgentJuls. Oliverchanr.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2879", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Horton & Williams, 29 March 1808\nFrom: Horton & Williams\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nMarblehead 29th. March 1808\nWe have the Honor to inform you, that our Schooner, Eleanor, was detained at laRochelle several days, to bring Mr. Nicholas Howe, with dispatches for Government. Genl. Armstrong wrote Mr. Boide Amern. Consul, to detain Her, & Government would pay for the damages. The Consul for political reasons, would\u2019nt give the Capt. the letter nor a Coppy. Mr. Howe the bearer of the dispatches will acquaint you with the particulars.\nWe can\u2019t ascertain precisely the damages considering the detention & Risk, but as Government have frequently taken up Vessels to carry dispatches, we submit it to you to make such compensation, as you may think adequate to the Detention & Risk. With sentiments of esteem we are, Sir, your most Hume. Serts.\nHorton & Williams\nI The undersigned have been asked by the Secretary of State what Sum is right that Should be paid to the owners of the Schooner Eleanor for her detention at Rochelle, on account of the government of the united States. It is his opinion that they are entitled to a Sum of fifty dollars.\nNichl Howe", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2880", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Sylvanus Bourne, 29 March 1808\nFrom: Bourne, Sylvanus\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nAmn. Consulate Amsm. March 29, 1808\nAll my endeavours with this Govt. to obtain a levy of the present embargo now on our Ships being proved fruitless, I have Solicited the interference of our Minr. at Paris in this regard, which may possibly be more fruitfull. It is indeed difficult to probe into the motives influencing the Cabinet in this measure Seeing that our Vessells are free to sail from the Ports of France. It was at first thought that it was intended to prevent information being given to the Enemy of two or three Vessels of War that were about to Sail for Batavia (as is supposed) but these have been gone some time & no change has taken place, & was the measure grounded in the expectation of any misunderstanding between this Country & ours, the value of the property contained in the Vessells here (all in Ballast) is hardly an object worthy the Consideration of Govt. It is however so far, fortunate that the Govt. consents to the departure of the Seamen & the Ship Lexington Capt. Gardner for Baltr. is a second Ship which has for this purpose been permitted to depart at the Request of Sundry merchants here to take home about 50 more Seamen & as the Masters of the Vessells from which they are discharged furnish the provisions for those 50 the U States will be at no charge on their Acct. but I have also sent ten more men who have discharged here by Govt. from the Merchant Capt. Johnson & Cap Graves & Ione Capt. Gardner, which have since many months past been under sequestration here for contraband trade will in all probability be ultimately Condemned.\nThe Russian, Danish & French Forces are Concentrating to march against Sweden in several quarters & the extraordinary cold weather we have had during this Month here must operate to retard for many weeks the arrival of the British fleet & troops that are preparing for sea And that in all probability She may crushed before the arrival of any Should not the almost inaccessible passes to the Country on the Land side be a means of preventing it.\nIn the course of a few weeks the residence of the Govt. will become fixed in this City which will enable to attend with more facility than before to many parts of my official duties, which on acct. of the peculiar State of public affairs have for some months past been very perplexing & painfull. I have the honor to be With great Respect Yr Ob Sert\nS Bourne\nPS It is Somewhat expected another Vessel must be permitted to depart from Rottm with Seamen while Mr. has not yet arrived to his Station there. Though I am deprived at this time of all income whether commercial or Official my presence here is highly necessary in this perilous period on many accounts interesting to the U States & many of its Citizens I feel it to be my duty to remain at my post confiding in the justice of my Govt. to recompense me therefor as my own means are not adequate thereto.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-29-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2881", "content": "Title: From James Madison to John Francis Mercer, 29 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Mercer, John Francis\nDear Sir\nWashington Mar. 29. 1808\nYour favor by your nephew was duly handed to me. His interesting appearance coincided with your recommendation, & it will give me pleasure to encourage his good qualities & to favor the success to which they shall be entitled. I can not promise however that it will be much in my power to do either, considering the disconnected Sphere in which his pursuits fix him. The $300 inclosed in your letter were not unacceptable, tho\u2019 they would have been greatly so, on a supposition that the remittance did not accord with your convenience which in such cases I hope you will always make the primary consideration.\nI should have been more in haste to acknowledge your favors, but that I wished to give you the result of the mission of Mr. Rose. I am now able to do it at full length and in a printed form. From this and other indications appearing from day to day, you will be able to estimate our relations to one great power. With the others we also stand on ground which might be more clear & solid than it is. In truth the conduct of the mighty rivals for power in Europe leaves but little repose to those who wish not to participate in their inequities or their destinies. I hope nevertheless that we shall keep out of the snares which are laid for us, and teach them all by an example that true policy among nations lies where it does among individuals in an inviolable adherence to honest maxims.\nI have just parted from your amiable daughter with whom I had the pleasure of dining at my nearest neighbors. I understand from Mr. Thomson that they will all be with you tomorrow or next day. Present me very respectfully to Mrs. Mercer & accept Dr. Sir the esteem & friendship of Your Obedt. Sert\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-30-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2882", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Samuel Courtauld, 30 March 1808\nFrom: Courtauld, Samuel\nTo: Madison, James\nSir\nWashington March 30, 1808\nI went this forenoon to the President\u2019s House to deliver the inclosed from Doctr. Wistar, but being informed by the Servant that His Excellency is confined to his Bed; I beg leave, herewith to transmit the same to you, with the letter I took the liberty to address you from Philadelphia, and will have the honor to wait on you at any time you may please to appoint. \nI am with much respect Sir Your most Obedt. and very humble Servt.\nSaml. Courtauld", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-30-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2883", "content": "Title: From James Madison to James Monroe, 30 March 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Monroe, James\nDear Sir\nWashington Mar. 30. 1808\nI recd last evening your favor of the 26. and now inclose the promised list of the communications to Congs. which gives as much information as can be done in that form. Where Extracts were made, they generally extended I believe to nearly the whole of the letters, it being intended that the residue should be reduced as much as motives of prudence & delicacy would permit. On examining the papers inclosed the project concerning impressments does not appear. Will you be so good as to correct the omission? A copy of the original project accompanying your letter of Novr. 11. went to Congs. in its proper place. Of course the renewal of it at the latter period does not appear, as the communications now stand. Being unable to distinguish which of the papers you wish to be returned, I send the whole, with a request that after taking them out, the rest may come back to the office. The inclosed paper contains the correspondence with Mr. Rose produced by his Mission. I remain Dr. Sir Yr. friend & servt.\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-31-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2884", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Johnston, Jr., 31 March 1808\nFrom: Johnston, George, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nNewyork 31st. March 1808\nI had the honour to receive in March last from the President of the United States, a Commission appointing me Consul for the port of Glasgow in Great Britain. On its receipt I proceeded to arrange my business, and close my concerns in this quarter as speedily as circumstances would admit, in order to depart for that Consulate, and was about to proceed, when the unfortunate outrage was committed on the frigate Chesapeake. This arrested me, and determined me to wait the issue of so unhappy & alarming an event.The continued unsettled state of political affairs, the suspension of Commerce, together with circumstances of a personal nature, induce me to relinquish the situation conferred on me, and I take the liberty with sincere gratitude & respect to return to you my Commission I have the honour to be Sir, Your most obdt. and very humble servt.\nGeo. Johnston", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-31-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2885", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Joy, 31 March 1808\nFrom: Joy, George\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir,\nLondon 31st. March 1808\nAbove is Copy of a Letter sent you Pr Science via, New York with an Extract from one of the Documents therein contained.\nAs the Science takes Convoy from Portsmouth I send this to Liverpool for a more speedy Conveyance Pr Packet and cover Duplicate of the other papers withinmentioned to which I add the Evidence lately taken on the subject of the Commercial Operations of the late Orders in Council and the British Press and Star of yesterday from which collectively you will gather the best, tho\u2019 a very inadequate, Report of the Debates of the preceeding Evening. These last, as I marked them myself, make the Evidence of little Value; except as to certain Points which may be profitably abstracted for other Objects; for it was to me most clear from the uniform admission on all sides of the Gross Impolicy of a War with America that this Measure, as far as it interferes with the Rights of the U. S., will be withdrawn. The Parts with which I was least satisfied were Lord Holland\u2019s Ideas of extraterritorial Jurisdiction, and Lord Hawkesbury\u2019s that the way to preserve Peace with us was to shew that they were not afraid to go to War; wch you may be assured he did say totidem Verbis. I am not sorry that he said it, since he thought it, for it is as well to be able to ascribe to their Right Object the Pretensions and high toned language of Diplomatists; but this cursed higgling, after the handsome Compliment passed by Lord Auckland to the uniform ingenuousness of Mr. Monroe and Mr. Pinkney savours so much of the old Leaven of a Jew Bargain, that one is led to despair of the Progress of Mankind to the Point of true Dignity, (which puts me in mind, by way of Episode, of Buonapart\u00e9 upon Dignitaries in the Star enclosed.). You will see that Lord H. availed himself, as he promised, of the Calculations I sent him in a way to make no small Impression on the house and to excite considerable Enquirey below the Bar. After sending them to him I could not with propriety develope them in other quarters till his Motion, which was put off from time to time, was brot: forward; but is it not surprising that, with these Documents on their Table, no such use should have been made of them in any of the numerous discussions that this subject has undergone? Between the first speech of Lord H. and his rejoinder I sent him the letter of which I enclose Copy; to which I could perceive he paid that sort of attention, conferring at the same time with Lord Auckland, and adding to his sheet of Notes, that it was evident he intended to make some use of the suggestion. He also noted largely on Lord Hawkesbury\u2019s speech till towards the Close of it he came to some admissions, unexpected by the Opposition, and I believe not intended by himself, till he found himself pushed by the Course of the Debate. \u201cIt was true that Mr. Rose had been sent out on a special mission but Instructions to negotiate had been sent to the proper Person. A Negotiation was pending. How far it was advanced it did not become him now to say\u201d &ca.\n This was the trick played off upon the Committee of American Merchants to blind them.\nThis greatly curtailed the Reply of Lord Holland; and entirely disarmed Lord Erskine, who had taken part in the former debates, brot: forward a Motion in the opposition himself, and taken Notes to reply in this Case, but he said not a Word and I never shall forget his looks or the folding of his Arms on the above coming forth from Lord Hawkesbury.\nI have not time to read over what I have written, being in haste to save the Conveyance and some doubt of it\u2019s reaching L\u2019pool in time. Dr. Sir, Your friend & Servt.\nGeo: Joy", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "03-31-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2886", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Tobias Lear, 31 March 1808\nFrom: Lear, Tobias\nTo: Madison, James\nThe following letters were communicated to Congress the 8th Novr. 1808.Mr. Lear to the Secy. of StateSir,Algiers, March 31st: 1808.\nA Copy of what I had the honor of writing to you on the 28th. instant, with its enclosures, accompanies this. The Vessel which took the aforesaid letter did not sail \u2018till the 29th.\nYesterday I sent my Drogerman to the Palace to know of the Dey what were his ultimate intentions (if he chose to declare them) respecting the business mentioned in my last; and to request that I might be allowed three months to receive the Orders of my Government. The answer brought was, that if I paid the money in the course of the day, we should stand as we were before; but if I did not, he should pursue his own measures. As I was yet uncertain whether his threats would be put in execution against me personally, or against our Commerce, I remained fixed in my first Resolution. This morning the two frigates, which had been preparing for some days past, made the signal for sailing; and a formal measage was sent to inform me that they had orders to capture American Vessels, (the threats of personal violence to me having had no effect) I thought it a duty which I owed to my Government and to my Country, to prevent, if possible, the Calamity which might fall on our Citizens and their property; I therefore sent to inform the Dey, that if he should recall his Orders from these Vessels before they sailed, and make no renewal of them to these or others, I would pay the money; but that I considered it as a measure forced upon me, and as such should represent it to my Government. The order was recalled, after the Frigates had got under way; and the money is to be paid tomorrow; which I shall obtain by Bills on John Gavino Esq. our Consul in Gibraltar, to whom I shall give Bills on the Secretary of State of the U. States, to meet the same. The frigates have gone out, and the other Cruizers will be got ready for sea immediately. A Vessel is expected to sail in afew days for Alicante, by which I shall write to our Consul, contravening the positive advices for our Vessels not to leave the ports in which they may be; but, at the same time, directing them to be strictly on their guard.\nI have this day had an opportunity of writing to Tripoli (the first which has occurred for more than 3 Months) which I have improved; and by the same route to Tunis, giving information of what has passed.\nPainful as has been my situation in this affair, I feel conscious of having discharged my duty to my Country in the best, and indeed only manner in my power. While I could beleive that the consequence of refusing to make this unjust payment would fall upon me personally, I was ready to meet it; but when I was convinced that my Country would suffer in the persons and property of its Citizens, I was obliged to yield.\nMy letters which accompany this contain all I have to say on our affairs here; and I shall only add the Assurances of high respect, and sincere Attachment with which I have the honor to be, Sir, Your most faithful & Obedt. Servt.\nTobias Lear", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2889", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Levett Harris, 1 April 1808\nFrom: Harris, Levett\nTo: Madison, James\nDuplicate.\nSir,\nSt. Petersburg Mar 20 / 1 Apl. 1808\nSince I had the honor to write You under date of 4th March, via Sweeden, inclosing a declaration of this Court against that of Stockholm, a second declaration has been issued, which I have the honor to transmit a Copy of together with the note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs which accompanied it.\nNothing of material importance seems to have taken place since the date of my last. The War in Finland has thus far been successfully prosecuted by Russia. Little opposition has been made by the Sweedes. No hostile measure against Neutrals trading with Great Britain has been taken on the part of this Government. The Ports here are free as formerly, and should our difficulties with England be amicably settled we may yet be able perhaps to enjoy an advantageous trade to the Baltic this Year; But as to this, much\n will necessarily depend upon the Kind of warfare which will be carried on by Great Britain & Sweden against Russia. I have the honor to be &c. &c. \n(signed) Levett Harris.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2890", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Carter Beverly, 1 April 1808\nFrom: Beverly, Carter\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nVirginia Fredericksburg 1st. April 1808\nMy Friend Mr. Tayloe of the City will do me the favor to present a letter I have this day addressed to him on the subject of a Friend of mine also, Thomas Strode, who (I learn from Gentlemen in this place) is extremely solicitous of becoming a Member of the Army of the United States. I feel so well persuaded of this Gentleman\u2019s particular disposition to become an Officer, and of his possessing the necessary talents & Letters to recommend himself, that I have no douts from his Rank & situation in life, he will perhaps receive that Consideration from the War Department that will enable him to obtain the distinction he so much wishes for. He has been for a long time a near Neighbor of mine, and I feel well Convinc\u2019d that he is possess\u2019d of those particular ideas, necessary to himself a good Military Character. Pardon if you please the liberty I have taken. I am Sir Very Respectfully Yr. Mo. Ob. Hble Servt.\nCarter Beverley", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-01-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2891", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Frederick Bates, 1 April 1808\nFrom: Bates, Frederick\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nSt. Louis April 1. 1808\nI have the honor of inclosing as the half yearly Report of the Secretary copies of the Acts passed from the 1st. October 1807 till 31st. March 1808; copy of a writ for the removal of John Harvey an Intruder on the Public Lands; Lists of new appointments in the civil department and of Licenses to trade with Indians, together with a List of the civil Officers now in Commission. Party fervors, since my last communication, have, in a great degree subsided; and except a late marauding incursion of a band of Osages; and some local discontents arising from mineral competition in the district of St. Genevieve, nothing has occurred to interrupt the public tranquility.\nOn these subjects the Governor will take measures and probably report specially with respect to them. I have the honor to be, with very great and sincere respect, Sir, Your most obedt Servant\nFrederick Bates", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-02-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2892", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Valentin de Foronda, 2 April 1808\nFrom: Foronda, Valentin de\nTo: Madison, James\nMuy se\u0148or mio:\nPhiladelphia Abril 2 de 1808\nTengo la honra de rendir \u00e1 este Gobierno de orden de mi Augusto Soberano el Decreto adjunto por el que ver\u00e1 su Exca. el sor. Presidente, que su unico fin \u00e8s obligar \u00e0 los Ingleses \u00e0 que respeten los derechos sagrados de Gentes. Dios gue.\n \u00e0 V S ms. as B. L. M. de VS. su mas atento servidor\nValentin de Foronda", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-02-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2894", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Tobias Lear, 2 April 1808\nFrom: Lear, Tobias\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nAlgiers April 2d. 1808\nI have the honor to inform you that I have this day drawn upon you, in favor of John Gavino Esqr Consul of the U. States in Gibraltar, for twenty thousand dollars, in four sets of Exchange, each set in five Bills, at 30 days sight, vizt,\nOne set for$3000.One do for4000.One do for6000.One do for7000$20,000 value received\nfrom him on account of the U. States, for their Barbary Affairs; which I pray you will have the goodness to honor, and pass the same to account. With sentiments of the highest Respt. I have the honor to be Sir, Your faithful & most Obedt Ser\n(Signed) Tobias Lear", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-03-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2895", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William C. C. Claiborne, 3 April 1808\nFrom: Claiborne, William C. C.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nNew-Orleans April 3rd. 1808.\nOn the 31st. Ultimo, the Legislature of the Territory, closed their Sessions; a copy of the acts passed, will be transmitted you, as soon as they are printed.\nYou will find by a message from me to the Legislature, (printed in the enclosed paper), the reasons which induced my approbation of \"a Digest of the Civil Laws now in force in this Territory\"; A work of the kind was indispensible to the due administration of Justice. I am Sir, with great respect your mo: obt. Servt.\nWilliam C. C. Claiborne", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2896", "content": "Title: From James Madison to William Pinkney, 4 April 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Pinkney, William\nprivate\nDear Sir\nWashington Apl. 4. 1808\nSince my last of Mar. 21. by Mr. Rose, I have had the pleasure of your two letters of Decr. 21 & Jany. 24. That of Decr. 10. has also been recd. These favors have been accompanied by packets of Newspapers and the several pamphlets following.\n1. Exposition of British orders in Council\n2. Notifications orders &ca\n3. Orders in Council. Examination of &c. (Brougham)\n4. Roscoe\u2019s pamphlet\n5. Lowe\u2019s Enquiry as to W. Indies\n6. Spence\u2019s Radical cure &c\n7. Discoveries on the late proceeding in the Baltic (Bentley)\n8. Narrative of measures agst. rank of Sr. H. Popham\n9. Edinburg Review (October)\nI thank you for these communications which are of a sort very proper, and which I hope you will be so good as to continue. In a Govt. like that of G.B. where one of its branches, and the publicity of its proceedings, connect it with the public opinion it is of great importance to know what that opinion is & what it is likely to be; and the press is a valuable tho\u2019 not always an infallible indication of both. The Edinburg Review appears to be conducted on principles and with abilities, which induce me to wish that it may be regularly sent to this Dept. Indeed I should like to place in the office all the preceeding numbers, if they can be conveniently forwarded, so as to have an entire set. This will not be very expensive as it appears to have but a recent origin. A compleat set of the Annual Register with the continuation as the volumes come out, made a part of the request addressed to your Predecessor.\nI have not been able to procure a copy of the pamphlet promised in my last. I send you however newspapers & sundry printed documents as you will see by my public letter.\nThe letters of Erskine & Champagny appear in the newspaper of this day. The manner of the latter & the matter of the former or indeed of both, will probably produce much comment & sensation. Judging from the apparent effect of these manifestations of the views of France & G.B. on Congress, it can not be doubted that they will rivet the policy of the Embargo and reconcile more & more all parties to the measure.\nIt is probable that another Dispatch vessel will be sent by the President in a short time. By that opportunity I shall be able to add any further communications which the intervening period may furnish. I remain Dr. Sir very respectfully and with great esteem Yr. obedt. servt\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2898", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Albert Gallatin, 4 April 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Gallatin, Albert\nSir.\nDept. of State, April 4. 1808.\nMr. James McGregor, Consul of the United States, at St. Thomas\u2019, having forwarded an account against this Department, for the relief of Seamen, which requires some explanation, and being desirous in the mean time to make him a partial advance thereupon, I have the honor to request you to issue a warrant for five hundred dollars, on the appropriations for the relief of Seamen in favor of William Thornton, who is authorised to receive the same. Mr. McGregor will of course be charged with this sum. I am &c.\nJames Madison.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2901", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Walter Jones, Jr., 4 April 1808\nFrom: Jones, Walter, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nWashington 4 Apl 1808\nThe Military Court of enquiry now sitting in the Case of Genl. Wilkinson, have made such progress in the enquiry as to render a paper in your office, useful to certain points of the investigation. The paper I mean, is the one an extract of which was published With the Presidents message of and is supposed to be a memorial sent to the Secretary of States\u2019 office by Mr. Daniel Clark of New Orleans. If compatible with propriety, I would thank you to have the original paper entrusted to my hands, for the purpose of being used in the management of the enquiry. I shall be responsible for the preservation & due return of the paper. I have the Honor to be very respectfully yr obt. St.\nW. Jones Jr.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2902", "content": "Title: From James Madison to William Pinkney, 4 April 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Pinkney, William\nSir,\nDepartment of State April 4th. 1808\nMy last was of March 22d., and went under the care of Mr Rose. I now forward printed copies of the correspondence with him on the subject of his mission, and of the antecedent documents relating to the case of the Chesapeake. As soon as the voluminous residue of the communications made to Congress issues from the press, it shall also be forwarded. You will find that they include certain documents relating to France which were thought proper for the knowledge of Congress at the present Crisis.\nTo these communications, I add copies of Mr. Erskine\u2019s letter to me on the subject of the British decrees of Novr. last; and of my answer. And that you may have a view of the ground which has been taken with respect to the French decree of Novr. 1806, and to the judicial exposition in the case of the Horizon giving it an illegal operation against the United States, I inclose copies of two letters to Genl Armstrong on these subjects.\nThe President made to Congress a few days ago, other communications relating to the present crisis with Great Britain and France, among which were Mr Erskine\u2019s letter now inclosed, and a letter from Mr. Champagny to Genl Armstrong, explaining the course meditated by the French Government with respect to the commerce of the U. States. These being excepted from the confidential character attached to the others have been published, and will be found among the printed inclosures. Your letter of Feby 26 was included in the communication to Congress but not in the exception.\nThe conduct of the two great contending nations towards this Country, as it will now appear to it and to the world, fully displays their mutual efforts to draw the United States into a war with their adversary. The efforts on both sides are too little disguised to be worthy the discernment of either, and are addressed moreover, to motives which prove great ignorance of the character of the United States, and indeed of human nature.\nFrom the posture in which Mr Rose\u2019s final reply to the compromise proposed to him, placed the question of adjustment in the case of the Chesapeake, it remains with the British Government to resume it, if adjustment be their object. Whether a tender of reparation will be made here, or to you, will also be on that side. It will certainly be most becoming that Government under all circumstances to make the reparation here, and this course might of right be insisted on by this Government. The President nevertheless, in the liberal spirit which always governs him, authorizes you to accept the reparation provided it be tendered spontaneously, be charged with no condition, unless it be that on the receipt of the act of reparation here the proclamation of July 2d. shall be revoked: and provided the reparation shall add to the disavowal of the attack on the Chesapeake, an express engagement that the seamen retained shall be immediately restored, and that the guilty officers shall experience an exemplary punishment. The reparation will be the more satisfactory, and not exceed a just expectation if the restoration of the seamen be made to the very ship from which they were wrested, and if provision be made for the wounded survivors, and for the families of those who lost their lives by the attack.\nI must repeat however that it is considered entirely proper that the reparation should be offered here, rather than in London, and it is only in the event of a decided repugnance in the British Government to make it thro\u2019 a functionary here, that you are to accept it there.\nThe answer to Mr. Erskine\u2019s letter on the British orders, will furnish the grounds to be taken in your communications with his Government on that subject. If the Cabinet can be brought to view the orders in their true light a revocation of the whole of them can not fail to take place, unless they mean to violate every maxim of justice, or are fixed in hostile purposes against the United States. In not regarding the orders indeed as acts of hostility and in trusting for redress to the motives and the means to which they have appealed, the United States have given the most signal proof of their love of peace, and of their desire to avoid an interruption of it with the British nation.\nStill it is to be understood, that whilst the insult offered in the attack on the American Frigate remains unexpiated, you are not to pledge or commit you Government to consider a recall of the orders as a ground on which a removal of existing restrictions on the commerce of the United States with Great Britain, may be justly expected.\nThe two letters to Genl Armstrong of 22d. May 1807 and Feby 8th. 1808 are proofs of the sincerity and impartiality with which the President has proceeded in relation to the belligerent parties, and may perhaps assist you in repressing unjust suspicions imbibed by the British Cabinet. It would be happy for all parties, the belligerent as well as the UStates, if truth could in this case be made to prevail; and if the retaliating rivalship of the former against the latter, could be converted into an emulation, as politic as it would be magnanimous in both, to take the lead in a fair, lawful, and conciliatory course towards a Nation which has done no wrong to either. Should the experiment be made on either side it would probably be followed on the other; and it could never happen, that the side first doing justice would suffer on that account.\nIn the present state of our relations to Great Britain, it would be premature to mark out the course to be pursued with respect to further negotiations on other topics, than those above noticed. You are authorized however to continue your interpositions in behalf of our impressed or detained seamen, and in the event of a repeal of the British orders, and satisfactory pledges for repairing the aggression on the Chesapeake to enter into informal arrangements for abolishinging impressments altogether and mutually discontinuing to receive the Seamen of each other into either military, or merchant service, conformably to the instructions on this point transmitted by Mr. Purviance.\nYou will find by a passage in Mr. Rose\u2019s reply of March 17th., that the British Government does not maintain the principle that the obligation of the United States extends beyond the discharge of deserters from their public service: and by an order of the Navy Department here, already carried into execution, of which a copy is enclosed, that it has lately been decided that no foreign Seamen, whether deserters or not, shall serve on board our ships of War. The principles respectively manifested by these documents, ought to facilitate such an adjustment as is contended for by the United States.\nIt cannot yet be said how much longer the Session of Congress will be protracted. The two provisions of most importance remaining to be decided on are the augmentation of the army, and a definition of the case or cases in which a repeal or relaxation of the Embargo, may, during a recess, be committed to the Executive. I have the honor to be &c.\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-04-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2903", "content": "Title: From James Madison to William Cabell, 4 April 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: Cabell, William\nSir,\nDepartment of State April 4. 1808\nAgreeably to an Act of Congress entitled \"An Act for the more general promulgation of the laws of the United States\" passed 3d. March 1795 and the acts in addition thereto passed 2d. March 1799 and on the 27th. March 1804, I have transmitted to the Collector of the Customs at Alexandria 1254 Copies of the laws of the UStates 2d. Session 9th. Congress being the proportion for the State of Virginia, with a request that he would forward them to your Excellency. I have the honor to be with great respect, Sir, your Obt. Set\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2904", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Wilkinson, 5 April 1808\nFrom: Wilkinson, James\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nWashington Apl. 5. 08\nBy recent letters from Goverr. Claiborne, and from my Atty. H. L. Duncan Esqr. I am advised that certain responses of Govr. Folchs to the Interogatories of Govr. Claiborne would be transmitted to the office of State for my use, and therefore I will beg leave to make application for those doccuments should they have come to hand; to enable me to employ them on my defence against the accusations of Messrs. Randolph & Clark. With perfect respect I am Sir your obt\nJ. Wilkinson", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2905", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William Pinkney, 5 April 1808\nFrom: Pinkney, William\nTo: Madison, James\nprivate\nDr. Sir.\nLondon April 5, 1808.\nThe Gentleman who takes my Letters (to go by the Science) not having yet left Town, I have an Oppy. of saying, that the Admy. has recd. Advice from the Senior Officer of the British Forces cruizing off L\u2019orient, dated the 22d. of last Month, that an American Merchant Vessel, about to enter that Port as a Flag of Truce, had just been brought to & examined & suffered to proceed, having shewn the Passport of the British Minister in America, & Dispatches from the Govt. of the U. S. to its Ministers at Paris & London.\nThe Osage had been spoken, on the same Day, or the Day before, by a Guernsey Privateer (according to a Letter from a Person in authority at Guernsey to Government) very near L\u2019orient.\nIf the Osage had left France soon after her arrival she must, without an Accident, have reached a British Port some Days ago. Conjecture is therefore busy as to the Cause of the Delay. Hammond suggests that she wd. probably be obliged to wait, as a Matter of Course, for Permission from the French Government, before she wd. be allowed to sail, & that the Necessity for this Permission wd. detain her about a Week. Upon this Hypothesis she may be expected every Hour.\nI enclose the Newspapers of Yesterday & today, to which (If I shd. not sooner close my Letter) I will add that of Tomorrow. I have the Honor to be with perfect Esteem & Considn. Dr.Sir, your mo. ob. hble Serv\nWm. Pinkney", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2906", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Anonymous, 5 April 1808\nFrom: Anonymous\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nNew-York 5th. April 1808.\nfiled with February 7, 1808\nIhave the pleasure to inform you that Dewitt Clinton has failed in obtaining a nomination of the old man at Albany. He had convened a caucus of the members of the legislature apointed a Chairman & Secy. But no sooner than they exposed the object of the meeting, than the members stole out of the room leaving the Chairman, Secy, & two or three behind to nominate if they thought proper.\nI am further informed that DeWitt intends to invite a meeting of the Citizens in and about Ablany, freindly to the V. President, for the purpose of nominating him & Monroe, And to extend the farce to this devoted City. In this, however, he will be mistaken. During the absence of Mr. Davis Mr. Franks (Editor of the P. A.), and myself, have been preparing the minds of our most influential committee men, for the event, and am happy to state that DeWitt & Cheetham have lost their confidence for ever. Indeed their influence is annihilated. We do not doubt of obtaining the next legislature if the Clintons do not unite with the federalists\nM. L. Davis has given great confidence to the friends of our cause in this City since his return from Washington. We are rejoyced to learn that the Clinton family are properly appreciated & perfectly known at Washington. The honest, the upright & the just of all parties will eer long detest the abandoned DeWitt. Mr. Davis is once more received with open arms by the oldest & most respectable of the republican party here.\nWe wish to see Dearborn in nomination. I am apprehensive that Morgan Lewis and his freinds (the Livingstons) have concluded a disgraceful treaty with Cheetham & his associates. See the Public Advertiser of yesterday.\nThis evening we have a general meeting to recommend the appointment of our nominating committee. Davis, Franks & myself, will be there. If any thing of importance occurs you shall know it. No friend on earth knows of these communications.\nH.", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2907", "content": "Title: To James Madison from John Armstrong, Jr., 5 April 1808\nFrom: Armstrong, John, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nParis 5 April 1808.\nI received the dispatches you did me the honor to address to me by M. Lewis on the 26 Ulto.\nThough I had complained often and earnestly of both the principles and operation of the Emperor\u2019s decrees of Nov. 1806 and December 1807 (having written at least twenty notes on the different cases which have arisen under them) yet as the Presidents orders were express, that on receit of your letter I should superadd to whatever representations might have been previously made, a formal remonstrance against those decrees, I did not lose a moment in writing and presenting the enclosed note; the terms of which will I hope appear to be such as were proper or necessary to the case, and calculated, either to obtain a recall of the illegal measures, or to leave in full force the rights accruing to the U. S. from a failure on the part of France to recall them. To this note I have not yet recieved an answer. Nor have I reason to expect one soon, as the Emperor has left Paris (it is said for Spain) and had, at no time before he set out, indicated any alteration in the views which originally produced the decrees in question.\nMr. Pinkney found means (in the return to the continent of M. D\u2019Alopeus) to Communicate the President\u2019s ideas on the subject of the general embargo, and particularly the desire he had, that it should not be considered as a measure of hostility against any foreign nation. Some explanations of this kind were perhaps necessary in England; where, from the misrepresentations of our own people, the character of the policy was likely to be misunderstood, but as neither the same nor any other reason existed for making them here, none have been offered.\nThe State of Europe differs little from what it was at the date of my letter of the 22d. of February Though Russia has opened her Finland Campaign, it does not appear to be with a view of driving Gustavus to the Island of St. Thomas, as some of the journalists facetiously assert, but merely of bringing him back to his senses. It is in this view that while She carries the sword in one hand, she offers peace with the other and that while she does some acts which, in themselves, are directly hostile, she does others, which are decisively friendly. Of this last character are the pains she has employed to prevent a descent on Sweden, from the side of Zealand, tho\u2019 by the way it is by no means clear, that Russia had not views in doing this much beyond the mere interests of Gustavus. Napoleon, on the other hand, has no doubt put a price on his forbearance, which is not short of it\u2019s value, and which is to be paid in Turkey. Such is said to be the basis of this new arrangement, which has the appearance of being satisfactory to both parties at present, and which is, no doubt, really so to one of them. There are however those who believe, that what is now made the ground of compromise and union, will soon become the apple of discord, that the apparent acquiescence of Napoleon is a mere stratagem to enable him to reap the Spanish harvest without alarm or interruption and that the moment this object is accomplished he will announce to Russia, that it belongs to him exclusively to dispose of the interests of his ancient friend & Ally, the Turk.\nThe Spanish tumults mentioned in my letter of the 26 Ulto. terminated in the disgrace of the Prince of Peace, in the abdication of Charles IVth. and in the accession of the Prince of Asturias to the throne of his father.\nThus far appearances would have warranted us in concluding, that the wishes of France, like those of Spain, were on the side of the new king; but how badly do we reasond, or how mutable are the wishes of nations! Charles has revoked his act of abdication; declares that it was done under the influence of fear, and demands the continued allegiance of his subjects. Napoleon will probably be the Umpire between these combatants, and will no doubt decide, that they are both unworthy. He has declined receiving the ambassador of the new King. I am, Sir, with very high consideration, your most obedient & very humble servant,\nJohn Armstrong", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2909", "content": "Title: To James Madison from William C. C. Claiborne, 5 April 1808\nFrom: Claiborne, William C. C.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nNew-Orleans, April 5th. 1808.\nThe \"Civil Code\" alluded to in my last letter, is nothing more, than a \"Digest of the Civil Laws now in force in this Territory\". This work will be of infinite service to the Magistrate and the Citizen: Heretofore a knowledge of the Laws, by which we were governed, was extremely confined; The Lawyers who avowed themselves to be civilians, told the Judges what the Law was, and the Citizens in the most common transactions of life, needed the aid of Council, But this state of insecurity and uncertainty will for the future be in a great measure removed.\nI see much to admire in the Civil Law; but there are some principles, which ought to yield to the common Law Doctrine; Indeed it has with me been a favorite policy to assimilate as much as possible the Laws & usages of this Territory, to those of the States generally; but the work of innovation, cannot be pursued hastily, nor could it be prosecuted to advantage or with safety until the existing Laws were fully presented to our view.\nI have no late Intelligence from Washington. The Fort Stoddard Mail often fails, and the earliest information is generally conveyed hither by water. I have thought, that if two or three Pilot Boat Schooners were employed in the conveyance of Letters between New-Orleans and the Atlantic Ports, that intelligence would pass and repass with great expedition; A Pilot Boat Schooner for instance with a tolerable wind might perform the voyage from Balize to Charleston in seven or eight days, and to Norfolk in twelve or thirteen.\nParties for and against Mr. Clark in this City are becoming violent. A news-paper war is raging. His Disposition against General W. has given rise to much severe an\u2019imadversion on Mr. Clark\u2019s general character and conduct. I have the honor to be Sir, with great respect, yo: mo: hble servt.\nWilliam C. C. Claiborne", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2910", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Philip Ludwell Grymes, 5 April 1808\nFrom: Grymes, Philip Ludwell\nTo: Madison, James\nHond. Sir,\nFredericksburg, April, the 5th. 1808\nI have this day recd. under your enclosure my Commission as Attorney for the U States for the District of Orleans; by which I feel myself greatly honoured; and for which I offer to the President and Senate a solemn Assurance of Fidelity to my Country, in every Case of Official duty in which I shall be engaged; the only return that I can now make.\nAltho I have been most actively engaged for the last three Months in making preparation for my departure to Orleans, I am not yet perfectly prepared to leave this State; I wish therefore to be ascertained whether my presence at my Post is immediately necessary; or whether I may not without a Neglect of Duty, delay seting out for a few Weeks in which time I may be able to make arrangements for the removal of my Family with me. My Movements shall be regulated by your Opinion on this subject, which I sho\u2019ld be glad to receive forthwith, directed to me at Urbanna; Middlesex County. I am with due respect, yr. Obt. Servt.\nP. Grymes", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2911", "content": "Title: To James Madison from George Johnston, Jr., 5 April 1808\nFrom: Johnston, George, Jr.\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nNewyork 5th. April 1808\nI take the liberty of enclosing to you a Copy of the Protest of Capt. Rockwell of the Ship William, of which I was part owner, one of several vessels, lately burnt on the Ocean by two french frigates.\nIf the government of France, returning to a sense of justice, shall ever make compensation to the Citizens of the United States, for such wanton destruction of their property, it will be the more acceptable to me, as I am unfortunately uninsured. I have the honour to be with the greatest respect Sir Your most obedient & very humble Servt.\nGeo. Johnston", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-05-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2912", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Monroe, 5 April 1808\nFrom: Monroe, James\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nRichmond April 5th. 1808.\nI have recd. yours of March 30th. with a list of the documents lately submitted to Congress, and the papers sent you from this place. I return to you those latter papers, on a presumption that you have not copies, of them, or rather the originals; if you have they can be of no use to you, & in that case I will thank you to send them back, or that you will send me copies at your leisure. My only motive in desiring them is to retain a set of all the documents appertaining to the transactions to wh. they relate, of wh. I believe but few are wanting. I am sorry that I have not a copy of the project of the article relative to impressment, which we presented to Mr. Canning with the amendments to the treaty proposed in obedience to your instructions by Mr. Purviance. I think it was the same in substance and form, with that referrd to in our letter of Novr. 11th. We understood your letter to sanction that one, & (to the best of my recollection) we declined altering it.\nI send you a note on the subject of the documents relating to G. Britain, all of which except the two first mentioned are submitted to Congress. In addition to the reason given in the enclosed paper, I think it due to the memory of Mr. Fox to let it appear, that he had not forgotten his promise in our last interview. However I am not particularly solicitous about them, if there is any difficulty in the case. The memoranda relative to the other documents, are sufficiently explanatory in each case, of my idea of what ought or ought not to be published. It is probable that the submission already made corresponds with it. I am far from insisting that it shod. be complied with where there are good reasons to the contrary, shod. there be any difference between them. I have some thoughts of taking a trip to Loudon in the course of a few days, to look after my interest there, & after that of the son of our late most estimable friend Mr. Jones. I am dear Sir Sincerely yours\nJas. Monroe", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-06-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2913", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Monroe, 6 April 1808\nFrom: Monroe, James\nTo: Madison, James\nDear Sir\nRichmond April 6. 1808\nMy expenses abroad having exceeded unavoidable the compensation allowed me in the station I held & the mismanagement of my estate in my absence, make it an object to me to command on loan the sum of about 10,000 dolrs. I should therefore be happy to receive the accomodation from the bank provided it would be willing to make it, on such terms as I could accept, or indeed comply with.\nTo enable you to answer this proposal it is necessary to give you a statement of my property, & of the security which I would pledge for the reimbursement of the money. I have in Albermarle 2500. acres of as good land as any in the county & about 30. slaves, with furniture stock &ca. I shod. suppose that my property there was worth three times the amount of the sum desired. I have in Loudon on Little river 100 acres of excellent land worth, at least, the sum in question. I have also property near this place & to the westward of some value. My object is to place in trust as much of any part of this property, as would be deemed an ample security> for a loan double its amount if necessary, in such mode and to such person as would be desired. I should of course by paying interest & & having . I should however the latter than the indorsement wh was to be \nIn a just view with the President tion I must accomplish the objects have in view in about three years & perhaps a . The accomodation would therefore prove of great service that the lands the present note. Therefore I will not presume to say.\nI shall thank you for information whether this arrangement is practicable. If from you are at liberty to use this will otherwise as to yourself doing I carrying it into fact Sir with great esteem very sert\nJas Monroe", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-07-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2914", "content": "Title: To James Madison from James Leander Cathcart, 7 April 1808\nFrom: Cathcart, James Leander\nTo: Madison, James\nSir,\nMadeira 7 April 1808\nI have the honor to inclose for your Information, the Documents relative to the Ship Manchester, with a duplicate of My Letter of 4: Ulto. which will inform you of her detention. Since my last no Alteration has taken place whatever on this Island. On the 26: Ulto. Sr. Sidney Smith in the Foudroyant, with the Agamemnon, and a Gun brig loaded with Rockets & other implements of Destruction, touch\u2019d here on his Passage to the Brazils to take the Command of that Station. He sail\u2019d on the 27th. & will Rendevouz at St. Jago, where he expects to be Join\u2019d by Some Transports. It is conjectured here that the British and Portuguese, will make an Attack upon Spanish America. Probably Buenos Ayres & Monte Video may be their primary Object.\nEvery Class of People on this Island are anxious for an Amicable termination of our Differences with Great Britain, & well they may. For in the Event of a War of any Continuation, they would be reduced to a State of Famine.\nAs soon as Circumstances will admit, I request that I may be furnished with a Commission, and that a Copy thereof may be forwarded to our Minister at London, in order that My Exequator may be granted by the British Government, for until I receive those Documents, I execute the duties of My Office, merely through the Courtesy of the Governor for the time being which may be attended with great Inconvenience. I have the honor to continue with Respectful Esteem Sir Your most Obedt. Servt.\nJames Leander Cathcart", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-07-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2916", "content": "Title: From James Madison to Thomas McKean, 7 April 1808\nFrom: Madison, James\nTo: McKean, Thomas\nDepartment of State Washington April 7, 1808\nAgreeably to an Act of Congress, entitled An Act for the more general promulgation of the laws of the U. States I have transmitted to the Collector of the Customs at Philadelphia 1026 copies of the laws of the United States 2d Session 9th Congress being the proportion for the State of Pennsylvania with a request that he would forward them to your Excellency. I have the honor to be with great respect Sir, your Ob Set.\nJames Madison", "culture": "English", "source_dataset": "Pile_of_Law", "source_dataset_detailed": "Pile_of_Law_founding_docs", "source_dataset_detailed_explanation": "Letters from U.S. founders.", "creation_year": 1808}, {"created_timestamp": "04-08-1808", "downloaded_timestamp": "10-19-2021", "url": "https://founders.archives.gov/API/docdata/Madison/99-01-02-2917", "content": "Title: To James Madison from Valentin de Foronda, 8 April 1808\nFrom: Foronda, Valentin de\nTo: Madison, James\nMuy sor. mio:\nPhiladelphia Abril 8 de 1808\nSiento extremadamente hallarme en la cruel necessidad de repet\u00ecr \u00e0 VS para que se sirva hacerlo presente \u00e0 Su Exa. el Sor. Presidente, que por momentos se me v\u00e1 desapareciendo la dulce \u00eclus\u00econ en que reposaba de que este Pays deseaba conservar la mejor armon\u00eca con el Rey mi Amo. S\u00ec Caballero Madison, los Sintomas que aparecen diariamente, redoblan m\u00eds temores de que se v\u00e1n afloxando los lazos de amistad, de armon\u00eca que existian entre estos Estados, y el Rey mi Amo.\nEl 5 de Enero escrib\u00ed a VS. solicitando un Pasaporte para un Barco que pasaba de 100 Toneladas, pero que iria en lastre. Si lo solicit\u00e9 de mayor cab\u00ecda que las indicadas por VS, en los dos Barcos que se me concedian para Correos, fu\u00e9 porque estaba ferrado en Cobre; porque se supon\u00eca muy velero; porque el Capitan me conven\u00eca mas. Su Excelenc\u00eca el Sor. Presidente no lo tube por conveniente porque pasaba de la medida que se me dict\u00f3.\nDespues v\u00ed que el Govierno por enviar sus cartas se ha separado de dho. reglamento, qe ha impuesto \u00e0 los Representantes de los Soberanos de Europa, pues se me dice que el Osage tiene mas de 200. Tambi