PMC 20201222 pmc.key 4781976 CC BY no 0 0 10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.042 4781976 26977434 S2352-3409(16)30064-6 344 Tom1, GAT domain, Tollip, Ubiquitin, nuclear magnetic resonance This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 348 surname:Xiao;given-names:Shuyan surname:Ellena;given-names:Jeffrey F. surname:Armstrong;given-names:Geoffrey S. surname:Capelluto;given-names:Daniel G.S. TITLE Keywords front 7 2016 0 Structure of the GAT domain of the endosomal adapter protein Tom1 0.9991358 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:22Z DUMMY: Structure structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z GAT 0.9416477 protein_type cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:56:57Z MESH: adapter protein 0.9997857 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:11Z PR: Tom1 ABSTRACT abstract 66 Cellular homeostasis requires correct delivery of cell-surface receptor proteins (cargo) to their target subcellular compartments. The adapter proteins Tom1 and Tollip are involved in sorting of ubiquitinated cargo in endosomal compartments. Recruitment of Tom1 to the endosomal compartments is mediated by its GAT domain’s association to Tollip’s Tom1-binding domain (TBD). In this data article, we report the solution NMR-derived structure of the Tom1 GAT domain. The estimated protein structure exhibits a bundle of three helical elements. We compare the Tom1 GAT structure with those structures corresponding to the Tollip TBD- and ubiquitin-bound states. 0.8085951 protein_type cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:56:52Z MESH: cell-surface receptor 0.99906075 protein_type cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:01Z MESH: adapter proteins 0.99983084 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:11Z PR: Tom1 0.99978274 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:16Z PR: Tollip 0.96031576 ptm cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:59:03Z MESH: ubiquitinated 0.9998591 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:11Z PR: Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z GAT 0.99981624 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:16Z PR: Tollip 0.999658 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:32Z SO: Tom1-binding domain 0.9997849 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:36Z SO: TBD 0.9995477 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:00:01Z MESH: solution NMR 0.9994789 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:22Z DUMMY: structure 0.9998665 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:11Z PR: Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z GAT 0.999076 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:22Z DUMMY: structure 0.917164 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:06:26Z MESH: compare 0.9998603 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:11Z PR: Tom1 0.99962676 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z SO: GAT 0.9995364 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:22Z DUMMY: structure 0.9989391 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:06:36Z DUMMY: structures 0.9998318 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:16Z PR: Tollip 0.9995357 protein_state cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:58:41Z DUMMY: TBD- 0.9995535 protein_state cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:58:47Z DUMMY: ubiquitin-bound TABLE title_1 730 Specifications table t0010.xml t0010 TABLE table <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><tbody><tr><td>Subject area</td><td><italic>Biology</italic></td></tr><tr><td>More specific subject area</td><td><italic>Structural biology</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Type of data</td><td><italic>Table, text file, graph, figures</italic></td></tr><tr><td>How data was acquired</td><td><italic>Circular dichroism and NMR. NMR data was recorded using a Bruker 800 MHz</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Data format</td><td><italic>PDB format text file. Analyzed by CS-Rosetta, Protein Structure Validation Server (PSVS), NMRPipe, NMRDraw, and PyMol</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Experimental factors</td><td><italic>Recombinant human Tom1 GAT domain was purified to homogeneity before use</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Experimental features</td><td><italic>Solution structure of Tom1 GAT was determined from NMR chemical shift data</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Data source location</td><td><italic>Virginia and Colorado, United States.</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Data accessibility</td><td><italic>Data is available within this article. Tom1 GAT structural data is publicly available in the RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rscb.org/) under the accession number PDB: 2n9d</italic></td></tr></tbody></table> 751 Table t0010.xml t0010 TABLE table <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><tbody><tr><td>Subject area</td><td><italic>Biology</italic></td></tr><tr><td>More specific subject area</td><td><italic>Structural biology</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Type of data</td><td><italic>Table, text file, graph, figures</italic></td></tr><tr><td>How data was acquired</td><td><italic>Circular dichroism and NMR. NMR data was recorded using a Bruker 800 MHz</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Data format</td><td><italic>PDB format text file. Analyzed by CS-Rosetta, Protein Structure Validation Server (PSVS), NMRPipe, NMRDraw, and PyMol</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Experimental factors</td><td><italic>Recombinant human Tom1 GAT domain was purified to homogeneity before use</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Experimental features</td><td><italic>Solution structure of Tom1 GAT was determined from NMR chemical shift data</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Data source location</td><td><italic>Virginia and Colorado, United States.</italic></td></tr><tr><td>Data accessibility</td><td><italic>Data is available within this article. Tom1 GAT structural data is publicly available in the RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rscb.org/) under the accession number PDB: 2n9d</italic></td></tr></tbody></table> 760 Subject area Biology More specific subject area Structural biology Type of data Table, text file, graph, figures How data was acquired Circular dichroism and NMR. NMR data was recorded using a Bruker 800 MHz Data format PDB format text file. Analyzed by CS-Rosetta, Protein Structure Validation Server (PSVS), NMRPipe, NMRDraw, and PyMol Experimental factors Recombinant human Tom1 GAT domain was purified to homogeneity before use Experimental features Solution structure of Tom1 GAT was determined from NMR chemical shift data Data source location Virginia and Colorado, United States. Data accessibility Data is available within this article. Tom1 GAT structural data is publicly available in the RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rscb.org/) under the accession number PDB: 2n9d 0.99951756 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:59:18Z MESH: Circular dichroism 0.9996252 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:59:32Z MESH: NMR 0.99964654 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:59:32Z MESH: NMR 0.9992082 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:06:30Z MESH: CS-Rosetta 0.9445149 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:59:43Z MESH: Protein Structure Validation Server experimental_method MESH: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:59:52Z PSVS 0.97021425 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:00:05Z MESH: NMRPipe 0.9534222 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:00:07Z MESH: NMRDraw 0.99847716 species cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:00:38Z MESH: human 0.9998481 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:11Z PR: Tom1 0.5058204 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z SO: GAT 0.99844825 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:00:14Z DUMMY: Solution structure 0.99984014 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 0.98831964 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z SO: GAT 0.9996598 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:59:32Z MESH: NMR evidence DUMMY: cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:00:28Z chemical shift protein PR: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z GAT TABLE title_1 1563 Value of the data TABLE paragraph 1581 The Tom1 GAT domain solution structure will provide additional tools for modulating its biological function. 0.99983656 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z GAT 0.9995917 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:00:14Z DUMMY: solution structure TABLE paragraph 1690 Tom1 GAT can adopt distinct conformations upon ligand binding. 0.999843 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 0.9992766 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z SO: GAT TABLE paragraph 1753 A conformational response of the Tom1 GAT domain upon Tollip TBD binding can serve as an example to explain mutually exclusive ligand binding events. 0.99981683 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z GAT 0.9990669 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:16Z PR: Tollip 0.99973947 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:36Z SO: TBD TABLE title_1 1903 Data TABLE paragraph 1908 Analysis of the far-UV circular dichroism (CD) spectrum of the Tom 1 GAT domain (Fig. 1) predicts 58.7% α-helix, 3% β-strand, 15.5% turn, and 22.8% disordered regions. The Tom1 GAT structural restraints yielded ten helical structures (Fig. 2A,B) with a root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.9 Å for backbone and 1.3 Å for all heavy atoms (Table 1) and estimated the presence of three helices spanning residues Q216-E240 (α-helix 1), P248-Q274 (α-helix 2), and E278-T306 (α-helix 3). Unlike ubiquitin binding, data suggest that conformational changes of the Tom1 GAT α-helices 1 and 2 occur upon Tollip TBD binding (Fig. 3A,B). 0.99765813 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:25Z MESH: far-UV circular dichroism 0.97389156 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:22Z MESH: CD 0.9930906 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:19Z DUMMY: spectrum 0.99947125 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:06:22Z PR: Tom 1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z GAT 0.999609 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:58Z SO: α-helix 0.9994879 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:59Z SO: β-strand 0.99985206 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 0.7947963 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z SO: GAT 0.9988989 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:06:41Z DUMMY: structural restraints 0.9295965 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:06:45Z DUMMY: structures 0.9993277 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:33Z DUMMY: root mean square deviation 0.9996222 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:36Z DUMMY: RMSD 0.9990892 residue_range cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:42Z DUMMY: Q216-E240 0.9997021 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:49Z SO: α-helix 1 0.9991074 residue_range cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:44Z DUMMY: P248-Q274 0.9997027 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:51Z SO: α-helix 2 0.99909496 residue_range cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:46Z DUMMY: E278-T306 0.99970627 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:53Z SO: α-helix 3 0.99831545 chemical cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:07:05Z CHEBI: ubiquitin 0.99984026 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 0.99932325 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:58Z SO: GAT 0.9996645 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:01:56Z SO: α-helices 1 and 2 0.9998336 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:16Z PR: Tollip 0.9960354 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:36Z SO: TBD METHODS title_1 2559 Experimental design, materials, and methods METHODS title_2 2603 Protein expression and purification METHODS paragraph 2639 Human Tom1 GAT (residues 215–309) cDNA was cloned into both pGEX6P1 and pET28a vectors, and expressed as GST-tagged and His-tagged fusion proteins, respectively, using Escherichia coli [Rosetta (DE3) strain]. The 13C, 15N-labeled Tom1 GAT domain was expressed and purified as described previously. METHODS title_2 2939 Circular dichroism METHODS paragraph 2958 Far-UV CD spectra of the His-Tom1 GAT domain were collected on a Jasco J-815 spectropolarimeter using a 1 mm path length quartz cell at room temperature. The protein (10 μM) was solubilized in 5 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7) and 100 mM KF. Spectra were obtained from five accumulated scans from 190 to 260 nm using a bandwidth of 1 nm and a response time of 1 s at a scan speed of 20 nm/min. Buffer backgrounds were employed to subtract the protein spectra. Data was processed using the Dichroweb server and the CONTIN algorithm (http://dichroweb.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/html/home.shtml). METHODS title_2 3539 NMR structure determination METHODS paragraph 3567 NMR experiments were performed using 1 mM 13C, 15N-labeled Tom1 GAT domain in a buffer containing 20 mM d11-TrisHCl (pH 7), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM d18-DTT, and 1 mM NaN3. NMR spectra were recorded at 25 °C on a Bruker 800-MHz spectrometer (University of Virginia). The individual structure of Tom1 GAT was generated using CS-Rosetta (https://csrosetta.bmrb.wisc.edu/csrosetta). Chemical shift information (BMRB #26574) was used to obtain the structure calculation. The Rosetta calculations yielded 3000 structures of Tom1 GAT. From these, ten structures were selected based on their score and RMSDs, and converted to Protein Data Bank (PDB) format. NMR structural statistics for the ten lowest energy conformers of Tom1 GAT was generated using the Protein Structure Validation Suite. By using MolProbity, the Ramachandran analysis of the ten superimposed Tom1 GAT structures identified that 100% of the residues were in the most favored regions and there were no Ramachandran outliers in the allowed and disallowed regions. Protein structure images were obtained using PyMol (http://www.pymol.org). The structures of the ubiquitin- and Tollip TBD-bound states of the Tom1 GAT domain were obtained from data reported in Refs. and. REF title 4797 References 1910 1920 surname:Xiao;given-names:S. surname:Brannon;given-names:M.K. surname:Zhao;given-names:X. surname:Fread;given-names:K.I. surname:Ellena;given-names:J.F. surname:Bushweller;given-names:J.H. surname:Finkielstein;given-names:C.V. surname:Armstrong;given-names:G.S. surname:Capelluto;given-names:D.G. REF Structure ref 23 2015 4808 Tom1 modulates binding of Tollip to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate via a coupled folding and binding mechanism 5385 5391 surname:Akutsu;given-names:M. surname:Kawasaki;given-names:M. surname:Katoh;given-names:Y. surname:Shiba;given-names:T. surname:Yamaguchi;given-names:Y. surname:Kato;given-names:R. surname:Kato;given-names:K. surname:Nakayama;given-names:K. surname:Wakatsuki;given-names:S. 16199040 REF FEBS Lett. ref 579 2005 4921 Structural basis for recognition of ubiquitinated cargo by Tom1-GAT domain SUPPL title_1 4996 Supplementary material SUPPL footnote 5019 Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.042. gr1.jpg f0005 FIG fig_caption 5136 Representative far-UV CD spectrum of the His-Tom1 GAT domain. 0.99858 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:03:56Z MESH: far-UV CD 0.71714723 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:06:50Z DUMMY: spectrum 0.8865229 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:04:25Z MESH: His- 0.9922563 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:59Z GAT gr1.jpg f0005 FIG fig 5198 Fig. 1. gr2.jpg f0010 FIG fig_caption 5206 (A) Stereo view displaying the best-fit backbone superposition of the refined structures for the Tom1 GAT domain. Helices are shown in orange, whereas loops are colored in green. (B) Ribbon illustration of the Tom1 GAT domain. 0.9992467 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:04:41Z MESH: backbone superposition 0.9941738 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:06:54Z DUMMY: structures 0.9998486 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:59Z GAT 0.99984694 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:59Z GAT gr2.jpg f0010 FIG fig 5433 Fig. 2. gr3.jpg f0015 FIG fig_caption 5441 (A) Two views of the superimposed structures of the Tom1 GAT domain in the free state (gray) with that in the Tollip TBD-bound state (red). (B) Two views of the superimposed structures of the Tom1 GAT domain (gray) with that in the Ub-bound state (green). 0.9534955 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:05:10Z MESH: superimposed structures 0.99984646 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:59Z GAT 0.99965954 protein_state cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:05:18Z DUMMY: free 0.9996728 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:16Z PR: Tollip 0.99953216 protein_state cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:05:15Z DUMMY: TBD-bound 0.9632287 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:05:12Z MESH: superimposed structures 0.9998419 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:59Z GAT 0.9995443 protein_state cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:05:16Z DUMMY: Ub-bound gr3.jpg f0015 FIG fig 5697 Fig. 3. t0005.xml t0005 TABLE table_caption 5705 NMR and refinement statistics for the Tom1 GAT domain. NMR structural statistics for lowest energy conformers of Tom1 GAT using PSVS. 0.99963295 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:59:32Z MESH: NMR 0.9961254 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:05:29Z DUMMY: refinement statistics 0.9998447 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:59Z GAT 0.999608 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:59:32Z MESH: NMR 0.9994303 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:05:33Z DUMMY: structural statistics 0.99985063 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 0.9986708 structure_element cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:59Z SO: GAT 0.9996277 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:05:31Z MESH: PSVS t0005.xml t0005 TABLE table <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th/><th><bold>Tom1 GAT</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><bold>NMR distance and dihedral constraints</bold></td><td/></tr><tr><td> Dihedral angle restraints total</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td><italic> ϕ</italic></td><td>89</td></tr><tr><td><italic> ψ</italic></td><td>89</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Structure statistics</bold></td><td/></tr><tr><td> Dihedral angle constraints (deg)</td><td>8.8±0.2</td></tr><tr><td> Max. dihedral angle violation (deg)</td><td>111±3</td></tr><tr><td>Deviations from idealized geometry</td><td/></tr><tr><td> Bond lengths (Å)</td><td>0.011</td></tr><tr><td> Bond angles (deg)</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>Average pairwise r.m.s. deviation (Å)<xref rid="tbl1fna" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></td><td/></tr><tr><td> Protein</td><td/></tr><tr><td> Heavy</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td> Backbone</td><td>0.9</td></tr></tbody></table> 5839 Table 1. t0005.xml t0005 TABLE table <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th/><th><bold>Tom1 GAT</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><bold>NMR distance and dihedral constraints</bold></td><td/></tr><tr><td> Dihedral angle restraints total</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td><italic> ϕ</italic></td><td>89</td></tr><tr><td><italic> ψ</italic></td><td>89</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Structure statistics</bold></td><td/></tr><tr><td> Dihedral angle constraints (deg)</td><td>8.8±0.2</td></tr><tr><td> Max. dihedral angle violation (deg)</td><td>111±3</td></tr><tr><td>Deviations from idealized geometry</td><td/></tr><tr><td> Bond lengths (Å)</td><td>0.011</td></tr><tr><td> Bond angles (deg)</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>Average pairwise r.m.s. deviation (Å)<xref rid="tbl1fna" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></td><td/></tr><tr><td> Protein</td><td/></tr><tr><td> Heavy</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td> Backbone</td><td>0.9</td></tr></tbody></table> 5851 Tom1 GAT NMR distance and dihedral constraints  Dihedral angle restraints total 178  ϕ 89  ψ 89 Structure statistics  Dihedral angle constraints (deg) 8.8±0.2  Max. dihedral angle violation (deg) 111±3 Deviations from idealized geometry  Bond lengths (Å) 0.011  Bond angles (deg) 0.7 Average pairwise r.m.s. deviation (Å)a  Protein  Heavy 1.3  Backbone 0.9 t0005.xml t0005 TABLE table_footnote 6261 Pairwise backbone and heavy-atom r.m.s. deviations were obtained by superimposing residues 215–309 of Tom1 GAT among 10 lowest energy refined structures. 0.9994108 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:05:50Z DUMMY: r.m.s. deviations 0.99964523 experimental_method cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:05:52Z MESH: superimposing 0.9990513 residue_range cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:05:56Z DUMMY: 215–309 0.99986255 protein cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:12Z PR: Tom1 structure_element SO: cleaner0 2023-07-20T14:57:59Z GAT 0.9991259 evidence cleaner0 2023-07-20T15:06:59Z DUMMY: structures