"
No, it should have been part of a request at the MoS, centrally, where a broader part of the community might have participated; the discussion would have been advertised properly; and the big picture would have counted for something, not Mr Anderson's war of attrition against the MoS and his desire to see people do as they please at article level. The move had no legiticimy, IMO, and still doesn't. I don't acknowledge it. Aside from this, the breach of WP:INVOLVED demands that Graeme Bartlett revert his move, which was subject to a serious conflict of interest: that is the only proper course of action.  (talk) "