"
 The first reference is a dead link, your second and third references use a different name than the current title. Which means I count zero sites using your suggested name. You may well be right but I'm not about to make a change to a name and call it uncontroversial when I haven't yet seen a single example. 
 As I said before and you've simply added confirmation, the seem to be several variations of the spelling of the station name. That's a good reason for posing a question in getting feedback on an article talk page. This page isn't the right place to carry out that discussion. If you are convinced that I miss reading this and think it is still uncontroversial, go ahead and reinstate the template with the desired move and perhaps someone else will take care of it.(Talk) "