"

 RE: ""Critical Reception"" Edits 

I liked the intro that you added to the critical reception section, but the inclusion of a reviewers name seemed a bit odd - name's of reviewers aren't usually included in the review section.  Also, reviews should be organized (roughly) by the clout of the reviewing publication, i.e. well-known publications come first and continue in decreasing order of popularity.  I also think it's important for the opinion of the reviewer to be easily readable, i.e. if a reviewer deems the record ""her best work since [insert album title], it should be included in the summary, not lumped together and simply referenced.  If you have any questions/disputes with my reversion, let me know."