"

New questions

1) Why is criticism consistantly ahead of tradition in all of the entries? How do people know what is being criticised if they haven't heard of the tradition yet?

For instance, why is ""Dating and content"" AFTER ""Historical accuracy?"" Doesn't one have to have an idea when the book is written and what people say the book is about before you can cricize its accuracy?

2) What is the sole Adventist position on ""Literary structure"" doing here, instead of an a ""Chiasm"" page, with a link to there?

3) Shouldn't the ""Unity of Daniel"" section be fused into the introduction, since they are saying nearly the same thing.

4) What is the ""Traditional Tomb Sites"" section doing here if there is already a page for it, and the subject relates to the life of Daniel (the ""Daniel"" page), and has little to nothing to do with the ""Book of Daniel"" page?

Ike   "