", 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I was having trouble with the collapsible divisions too. You're also right about the ""id."" thing. In fact, the ""id."" in 70 was wrong, since 69 was a Yermolinsky cite, and 70 a Watson cite. I had inserted a bunch of stuff between the prior Watson cite and 70, and hadn't noticed the need to change the ""id."" Now I've killed all the ""id.""s except those within a single reference number.   05:28"