(You're welcome).  That is a stretch.  If the only reason the picture is featured is that it exists, it should be removed.  How is the reader to know that we are showing this image because we think its existence somehow proves something about societal attitudes - and we don't even indicate what it proves.  Also, we have no idea if that picture was hidden away for hundreds of years.  The fact that it exists doesn't really prove anything.  Images in the societal attitudes article should be about societal attutudes.