"Robert,

Thanks for your assistance to date with my complaint against Lucky 6.9.  I realize that we're all volunteers, and I am impressed both by Wikipedia and the culture.  I respect that you feel it would not be wise for me to request that Lucky 6.9 be stripped o administrative rights, but I would like to go ahead, for the reasons stated on my talk page, and yours.  I haven't heard from you since then.  (I realize that we're all volunteers).  Would you like to continue to assist me, or should this issue be passed to another user?  Recent developments are that on 2/12/06, Lucky 6.9 put me on indefinite block.  He left this explanation on my talk page (which you can see in the history):

""That comment on your user page regarding hobbies, cars and political leanings on other user pages did it for me. I refuse to be taunted by you any further. You are off this site for good. I tried to help you; you chose to rub my nose in my error and have continued to do so.  The Wikimedia Foundation is aware of the situation. If you have any further questions, talk to them. -  ""

While blocked, I sent an email to info-en@wikimedia.org, asking for help.  The matter was looked into and this morning (2/13/06) I got the email:

""I have reviewed this situation and determined that the block appears to  have been unjustified.  I have removed the block.  While I think you could have handled yourself better than you did, I did not see anything in your conduct that merited a block at all, let alone the blocks you received.

Yours sincerely,
Kelly Martin""

When I attempted to go to Lucky 6.9's user page, the system said that there is no such page.  I would like to proceed with steps to ensure that if this individual ever does reappear in Wikipedia, that he no longer have administrative powers.  I realize that the people who make the decision may not agree with me.  I can accept the outcome, but I would like to proceed.  I hope you are available to process the issue.  

"