"
Rather than have Folken once again try to ""game the system"" and then accuse me of being domineering when I try to revert his mistakes, who else here honestly prefers what he did over what was here before?  
1-it is not ""Original Research"" it is clarifying what was a confusing point
2-I don't care if I've ""hurt your feelings"", but...yes, the explanation you substituted wasn't proper English and just said ""one quarter German and Japanese"" etc.....if I don't like it I should write it better? Yikes.  Folken I'm not going to help you in defacing an article
3-once again, you're doing surprisingly little ""actual work"" but simply quoting rules and ""gaming the system"" without contributing much of any real value
4-Folken, I'm not going to hand you a crown for quoting rules out of context for your own benefit, nor am I taking such threats seriously.  You would use the letter of the law to destroy the spirit of the law.  
5-Folken, how many times can I say this?  I'll be more direct:  you are not an Administrator, and have no real authority or ""sticking power"" to maintain a revert.  I'm going to revert your awful changes, and let me guess; you're going to revert them back and claim ""revert war""?  Yikes.    

I am not ""gaming the system"". Please explain what you mean by that instead of throwing random bad faith accusation. You cannot revert ""mistakes"" as I haven't done any, contrary to you. Or again, please prove what mistakes I would have committed, instead of blindly reverting and justifying your actions with unsubstanciated and gratuitous accusations.

1) No, making things up about the never-mentionned nationality or appearance of never-seen characters, or about the supposed lives of characters prior to the series (the dual-citizenship) that are never mentionned, is original research. There is no need of ""clarifying"" with OR a point that is self-explanatory.

2) Again, your words are not the word of God. You can use all the excuses you want, like ""improper english"", it still won't work as you are unable to prove anything you're saying. And yes, you are going to rewrite instead of remove. Otherwise, it means your ""proper english"" is just an unsubstanciated pretext. If you refuse to reword, then it means there's nothing to reword and that it's already proper english.
Your bad faith accusation of ""defacing"" are considered as a personal attack. You have now been warned.

3) ""Actual work"" includes getting rid of unsuitable edits like yours. And yes, quoting rule is an important thing in WP as rules define how contributors must work on WP. So yes, correcting the edits of users like you who don't give a damn about the rules and make unsuitable edits is a huge ""actual"" work. Also, you still fail to explain what ""gaming the system"" means...Don't throw random accusations.

4) ""Quoting rules out of context"" seems to be your favorite attack. But please explain how what I said would be ""out of context"". You're quick in accusing and insulting, not in actually proving your point...And yes, I'm serious.

5) I'll be clear, VVVVV, you are not an Administrator, and have no real authority or ""sticking power"" to maintain a revert. The thing is, you're not going to revert anything, unless you've forgotten your little speech about ""consensus"" and ""community effort""...I have not see you discussing anything about content or asking anyone's opinion. Sure, you've stated all the hatred you have for me, but it doesn't count as consensus discussion.

So, to sum it up, you accuse me of ""being an admin"" because I oppose to your edits, but you don't have any problem with mass reverting without any justification ? enough of this.  

Cooler heads prevailing:  yes, I have indeed not changed your reversion, and I will wait for what everyone else has to say.  (I didn't mean that last part about ""what if I change it back?"" literally..nevermind).  but on to point 2:  specifically, your profile says that English is not your primary language, and you added in a sentence that didn't make sense; leading me to suspect that you are honestly mistaken.  Not in grammar or something, I mean it was confusing.  Why should I help you make a reversion I disagree with in the first place?  And if it's because you're quoting a literal translation of a Red Cross Book excerpt....Folken you honestly know that the literal translation is choppy and needs to be smoothed out.  These aren't ""my"" edits Folken: the article as it exi