"

JFW's statements are in italics below:

It is your POV that the Bible is not logical.
No, it is a plain fact.

It is your presumption that Moses would write someone else on the second set of tablets that wasn't on the first set.
No, it's not.  Disputing an assertion DOES NOT CONSTITUTE presuming the reverse.  I have attempted to explain this to you again and again, and you are either unable or unwilling to grasp this simple concept.

The discrepancy between God vs Moses doing the writing does not automatically suggest that the text was different.
I never said that it does.  It does, however, destroy your argument, because clearly the two passages don't refer to the same act of writing.

That is what I mean by ""plain meaning"".
Let us be clear here.  You just asserted that that which you claim is my position (which, by the way, is not my position) has not been proven, and then you declare that that is what you mean by ""plain meaning"".  In other words, you just admitted that your position is based entirely on argument from ignorance: your intepretation is not proven to be incorrect, therefore it is the ""plain meaning"".

Try not to be rude - my comprehension is fine.
No, clearly it's not.  And trying to pass your intepretation off as ""plain reading"" is rude.

You can accuse me of WP:NPOV and WP:NOR violations all you like, but I have advanced a number of arguments - based on 3000 years of what you call ""erroneous"" interpretations - that you have not actually disproven.
No, y ou haven't advanced a number of arguments.  You have advanced one arguments, which I have shown to invalid.  And as I said above, the burden of proof is not on me to disprove your position, I but on you to prove it.  And as I have already pointed out, even if you WERE to present a convincing arugment for your argument, that would not address the NPOV or NOR issues.  Finally, I never said ""erroneous"", and I don't appreciate your misrepresenting my position.

I asked you not to make any more edits to the article, especially when they violate WP:POINT
You were already in violation of WP:NPOV and WP:NOR, and now you're in flagrant violation of WP:AGF  "