Basically, Community de-Adminship - the community being allowed to put forward the de-sysoping (removal of system operator status) of an admin - in a kind of reverse of the way the admin was accepted (ie by community votes). The admin status and tools are removed. It's much needed symmetry that will automatically make all areas of Wikipedia more accountable in my opinion. Admins will no longer have emeritus status. It had the most support here, so people created Wikipedia_talk:Community_de-adminship/Draft_RfC. Previously, to remove a 'bad apple' a complaint had to be made at WP:RFC to get arbcoms attention. The CDA proposal is likely to be put through RFC to get attention too. It's more about removing bad apples though - it is something that will make admin think twice about the arrogant way they act. People will think twice about whether they want to be one. Bureaucrats will think twice about the judiciousness of their final decision to check for fairness/consensus (if it goes that way, and I think it it may have to). These are all good things - don't trust any administrator who says they aren't! A mop is tool of work - admins must be into the work, not the power. When people are accountable, they behave so much better, and the pipsqueaks are less attracted to the job.