I certainly agree with that statement although I do disagree that the above blocks are warranted obviously. Could a block be justified certainly, but I am not vandal, I am no spammer and I am not harassing anyone. Personally, who I am or am not is less relevant than the fact of my making positive edits if in fact editing is still important. I would also add that the statement by HJ Mitchell about how many blocks he has was less than compelling for me. It scared me a little actually. If he has that many blocks there is absolutely no way that all of those are valid. There is absolutely no way there weren't mistakes made and there is no way that he hasn't driven off editors. 13000+ blocks, quite frankly, reflects an admin who is too trigger happy and will only get worse with the checkuser when they can just arbitrarily look up any IP or editor at will. What also bothers me, as can be seen in the Protonk situation is the decision that no talk page message was needed no discussion, no nothing. Just I am going to block you because I don't agree with you. Personally calling protonk statements BLP violations was a major stretch. Perhaps ad hominim personal attacks but even then. Extremely poor block and unfortunately only one among thousands obviously.96.255.237.170