Pseudoscience category? 

I'm assuming that this article is in the pseudoscience category because of its association with creationism.  However, there are modern, scientifically-accepted variants of catastrophism that have nothing to do with creationism — and they're even mentioned in the article!  I think the connection to pseudoscience needs to be clarified, or the article made more general and less creationism-specific and the category tag removed entirely.