Reverting several edits by User:Toddst1 

I have removed the Trinity reference as I believe it falls into the category of potentially libelous material.  It makes claims of possible malpractice that, if true, should be taken up in court, not fought out here on WP.  Also, I disagree with simply repasting the conflict of interest, advertising and other tags.  The puffery and peacock words are gone.  I took them out myself.  I have no connection with Ousterhout.  I haven't even talked to him or anyone on his staff in perhaps 10 years.  Finally, I disagree with removing the sentence describing what he does; the patient accounts make it clear both what he does and that he often does it in a single day of surgery.  I do concede it's worth citing his book in support of the statement that he developed the procedures in the 1990s.