"

 vandalism and prejudicial reverts by TheOldJacobite and others 
Well, it seems my concerns were justifiably founded then. It seem that this isn't the first time that TheOldJacobite has been involved with personal attacks, harassment and arbitrary reversion of articles.  That probably explains his attempts to have my edits removed, the page blocked and me blocked - requests that were ignored by Admin. I was quite shocked to read the log on him as it's clear that he hasn't learned a thing about courtesy to new editors, (quote) ""violation of reversion rules"", or ""repeatedly adding inadequately sourced rumor"".
I guess some people never learn which is a real pity, as the article is otherwise pretty sound.  TheOldJacobite just seems to want to own it, and not let anyone add anything of note to enrich it.
I think he should be reminded of Jimmy W's mission that Wikipedia should be open to all, and not just those who think they own Wiki, which they clearly don't.  No wonder Wiki is imcreasingly viewed as broken beyond repair when users of his ilk are allowed to bully and harass users over edits that are FULLY IN LINE WITH WIKI POLICY!

Block Log: User:TheOldJacobite.
01:44, 23 October 2013 Mark Arsten (talk | contribs) blocked TheOldJacobite (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR violation on Wool 100%) 
19:35, 30 March 2013 Reaper Eternal (talk | contribs) blocked TheOldJacobite (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 24 hours (Personal attacks and violation of the three revert rule: Completely inappropriate edit summary at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=547855858&oldid;=547855799) 
00:38, 18 September 2008 FisherQueen (talk | contribs) blocked TheOldJacobite (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 24 hours (Personal attacks or harassment: Repeatedly adding inadequately sourced rumor)"