I'm not sure that's necessary, Anna. The recent disputes have been the result of a single editor's obstructive edits. I suggest that the article be examined one section/heading at a time. Most of the country data only needs minor tweaks, if that, to be neutral. The lead is problematic, but I suggest that we take some version of it, possibly the current version, and agree not to make changes until they have been discussed and meet consensus. The recent flurry of edits has been in response to major changes that were not discussed. It shouldn't take long to come up with an acceptable version.