"

I have returned from work and have to say i find this entire fiasco unbleivable. have any of you actually read the TM page? have you identified the number of editors ""edit waring and reversing material on there, A number of questions need to be asked:

1 You claim that Lb is a ""Sockpuppet"" yet you are aware that such an ""alt"" is created to hide ones idenenty. As a qucky sevey of the page makes clear - LB was generated as a reply to gender spcific assumptions while addrssing me - soemthing i see you are repeating Rleve. Perhaps you might want to read the article on ""gender neutral writting?

2 You claim i made 3 reverts yet I only count one. indeed, once again it is the editor form the TM org - who doesn't even have the deceny to loggin - who i think you will find made 3 reverts.

3 You claim edit wars yet it was clear form my comments that this was an attempt to make a ""bold"" edit to bring the article out of a stalemate is had been in for months. Can I point out the statement I made that I would not the only contest any revert but for people to give it a little time while things settled down (see Tm talkpage). Can i add that the only revert i made was to an unknown user who had been highly disruptive editing the article for 24 hours - see history.

4 The final fact seemed to be that I used MED-R guidelines to remove none complaint studies from the article while the editors ""calmed down"" and came to some sort of neutral npov edit.

I have put up with a lot of harassment for my religious views - or should that be my atheism - I hope this is not a continuation there of?   
  "