":::Oh noes!  The person who is engaged in trying to have his way feels that I'm being incivil!  Whatever will I do?  Is there no defense against the fretful porpentine of an acronym on my talk page?  I have been labeled, now.  I have been assessed, and I am ""incivil.""
John, you're making yourself look an ass.  You jump up and down trying to puff up that you, in your majesty, have assessed 40,000 articles.  I'm sorry that I'm not impressed.  You say that the article is ""incomplete"" because it isn't the same as a copyrighted source.  I'm sorry, but you're wrong about that, and your efforts at trying to say otherwise are making you look worse by the minute.  You are sacrificing your reputation for what?  When I don't play nice, and I do not play nice with some aspects of the meddling Projects, you start trying to again go with intimidation and majesty.
The problem is that you've undercut yourself with errors of fact, mistakes in outlook, enunciation of incompatible goals, and now trying to reach for official power to remedy the situation.  That's hideous, and it marks you are temperamentally incompatible.  You should not behave in that way.  A good administrator knows better than to threaten silly things like ""you are insulting me"" when they've been in multiple reverts.  In fact, the utter triviality of the stakes involved make you look even worse.  They make you look like a troll.
This is simply disgraceful.  Go away, please, and assess other assessings, but the assigninity is simply overwhelming here and now.    
"