":::::I don't understand this. What is going on? Arthur Rubin just blocked me? I mean is this process autocratic? Like anyone can block any time with random allegations? I couldn't help getting deeply insulted by this kind of behaviour. Some one on another page called me ""shit-stirring troll"" or ""MORON"" and told me to ""Fuck off"" because I was asking questions. Now I'm the bad guy? WHAT IS THIS? It all started yesterday when I edited a page Criticism of Islam. Please do check its history. I concede, my previous edit might have not been up to wikipedia standards but the administrator drmies, when I asked him why he reverted the changes, threatened to block me, told me ""be prepared to be blocked""(Now I know he was not the only one to feel that way). I ignored his threat as I was sanguine I was not being impolite or uncivil in any way. So subsequently I edited it for the last time and I truly kept it neutrally Informative (added Information which was not previously there on the page). But somebody reverted the changes again. Then I wanted to know more as to where was I going wrong. They told me that my sources are not reliable and other sources are simply reliable because they say so. Believe me that pretty much sums up their justification for reverting all of my changes.I am not a liar. I loathe sanctimonious Bigots.The truth is, criticism of islam article has so terribly untrue statements for sanitizing muhammad's misconducts and odious commands of Quran. It is less of a criticism of Islam and more of an apologetic exposition, a deadly attempt to justify many obscene misconduct of Muhammad) not to mention it is also fraught with atrocious lies with unreliable references. It is a grievous assault on history itself. No offense, but I think they don't know Islam very well. (Talk if you want) 

"