"Wangi said>>> who are you Reswobslc, or stupidcupid?
Well now you show yourself in your true colours for all to see. Now you accuse me of being two users? You find that a worthwhile comment? Now your making yourself look stupid. Well done!

Wangi said>>> I'm sorry if you think pointing out that in fact I didn't do something you alleged me to is a ""weak response"",
If I quote another user, and then reply to that quote, forgive me for making this sound simple but..99% of users would know im addressing my remarks to the person being quoted. Of course if your saying you weren’t sure if those were your remarks or not, that you could read through a couple of paragraphs to refresh your memory as to whether you said that or not than of course its all my fault. I should have placed a 12 foot banner saying THIS QUOTE IS NOT FROM WANGI!....maybe I should do that for every post? Or maybe your saying you post as more than one user and you forgot which ID you used?
Wangi said>>> but I'm getting a little pissed off here with your lack of care for facts - if you're going to say I did or said something then please be careful enough to make sure I did do/say those things. 
Well yes we see your use of the English language in all its glory once again here. If every post must specify whther its addressed at you or not I can see how frustrating it must be reading through wiki at all. 
Wang said>>> Wikipedia is an encyclopedia: not a link directory, and not a tourist guide"" - makes plenty sense to me.

Yes it does make sense. Of course you left out the context of my question which relates not to the general point of wiki but to the bias of some users (you) to which links they want to see. We already know you alone claimed the first link was spam and you removed it on that basis. Even users who don’t think the link should have been there agreed it was not spam. So your poor judgment is not in doubt. Your following days of rant showed your true reason for not wanting the link, it was because you didn’t like the idea of the site also selling hotel rooms. The link to the visitor centre is still there by the way, which shows it was regarded as being a legitimate item to link to. My point still remains that if its worth linking to the first link was far more useful to the general public.
 

"