"

 YOU WERE RIGHT 

Thank you for your intervention in the Eucharist article. You had no reason to be sorry, you were right the first time, according to Prodego:
The WP:3RR does not require the same editor to be reverted, only the same content. . . .  talk 

My footnote amplification was deleted four times by Looie/Lima. That is a clear 3R violation by Prodego's definition.  Also Lima has unilaterally redirected History of the Eucharist from Origin of the Eucharist, and tried to make a distinction between the two.

I'm grateful for any time you have spent on this up to now, and thank you in advance for any future attention.   "