"

 I have emailed you with a precise answer to your question. But for other wikipedians:
 
 I hereby publicly certify that to the best of my knowledge I have not been the sock puppet of MyronWyn,  
 Loren Dillman, TheScienceGuy, Lars Koenig or Mirondella.

 [In my future writings on the Lamé equation and uniformization, I hope that I might become the sock puppet of Felix Klein.] My personal connection with the Evans affair is the same as yours, but perhaps less so -)

 There is nothing underhanded in adding references to mathscinet and UNCC documents that Evans himself made publicly available. Both these references speak volumes.

 I am very glad that Evans' wikipedia page has been reduced to a stub. In its present form, however, the statements presented there cannot be verified by a wikipedia reader. Some link to the historical notes on the aias website seems necessary to make these statements verifiable. 

 I cannot understand why there are wikipedia pages on scientific cranks. However if these pages exist, the crankery should be made immediately apparent. I think my additions to this page have been: the mathscinet references which exposed the crankery; pointing out that the University of Glamorgan is a former polytechnic with no prowess in pure science; that Evans got himself fired from UNCC; and his invention of the idiotic term ""Cartan geometry"".  "