The lesbians were never members of the collective so they don't go in the table. The table is drawn from the contributor's panel on each issue and is therefore the source from which the statement that there were 15 members etc. Maybe if the table had a citation or someting saying it was a summary of the Collective members lists from issues one to ten would that do? It seems silly to summarise the table when it's there right after the comment.

On the lesbian contributors it seems wrong to pick them out for specific mention (there are probably 20-30 articles written by lesbians/women throughout the ten issues) when the male contributors who weren't members of the collective don't get mentioned explicitly.

Is there a time scale on getting this sorted? (It's 9.30pm here in the UK)? I'll do what I can tomorrow but I have work to do as well.