"

 To the contributors of the article 

Anonymiss Madchen has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the ""WikiLove"" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.  

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add  to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with !
 

Thank you for your hard work, and sorry about rough times in the past.  I'm going to go edit other articles now.

Anonymiss Madchen 

 I'm going to be bringing in additional experts to assist with the article 

Due to controversy and repeatedly being bogged down by genocide deniers who conspire against any dissonance and manipulate and exploit Wikipedia policy in order to get away with their genocide denial, I am going to bring in several experts who will assist in exposing the truth, and embarrassing those who committed and support the rape of children.  I know at least three people who I am sure will accept my request; I also plan to invite more to come and assist with rewriting this article.

Anonymiss Madchen 

 Paul Siebert 

This guy's just like a Holocaust denier in the way he masks his revisionism in casual and practical editing.  He recently removed the section by Sascha and commented that it was poorly sourced despite the fact that two of the sources are easily availible online, and another is from a book, which can also be found on Google Books if the page or quote is entered.  He's clearly grasping at straws.

Would anyone have any objections to sending out a mass text to undo his revisionism when he goes on one of his rampages?

  
He was correct. ""Poorly sourced"" means that the added text was not supported by any sources mentioned in the article. If you want to add something with proper references, go right ahead. And in the future, please refrain from accusing a good editor of something as serious as ""Holocaust denier"" when you know for a fact this is not true. I highly suggest not attempting some kind of attack on the article either. |  | talk | 

I was the original writer of the section.  I also received the same briefing on Paul Siebert from Alex before registering here.  First, the sources were mentioned in the article, if you're referring to the ones about Neo-Nazi historical revisionism, as I was talking about what Neo-Nazis say, and their revisionism.  Second, Paul Siebert, assuming what Alex told me is true, is a Holocaust denier, as he denied acts of genocide committed against Holocaust victims at the end of the war.  This can be confirmed in Auschwitz: Inside the Nazi State and The Fall of Berlin 1945, both of which have been cited here by Alex.

  
"