"

A ""TotallyDisputed"" notice would probably be appropriate, given the depth of disagreement that exists here, but I cannot understand why highlighting statements identified by some as ""dubious"" would constitute ""disfiguring the article"".  SlimVirgin has also used that wording recently, but I rather think that inaccurate and irrelevant information is more of a ""disfigurement"" than is a template notice.

To answer your second question: my ""side"" has brought forward a proposal, and the other side has not yet responded.  This is sadly consistent with recent patterns of delay.  (I'll make no comment on whether or not this is a deliberate strategy.)   "