Given that non-neutral editors such as Saedon are given what appears to be total control over intelligent design-related articles, is it any wonder these articles are rated so poorly, and Wikipedia's trustworthiness regarding the subject is in such serious jeopardy? As of this writing, the article on irreducible complexity has scores of a lowly 2.8 in trustworthiness, and an appalling 1.8 in objectivity. Is this considered acceptable? I sincerely hope not, for Wikipedia's sake.