For a controversial figure, surprisingly little controversy 

After hearing the founder of wikipedia was an Objectivist, I had visited this page a few of years ago to see if it biased in favor of his views. At that time, there was a lot more in the article about criticisms and controversy. After perusing it, I was satisified that it presented a pretty even-handed portrayal. Reviewing it now, it appears to be pretty sanitized. The word 'cult' isn't used once (I know it appears in the article on objectivism, but it seems relevant here as well), and the philosophical criticisms have been truncated considerably. I know Objectivism enjoys a large following on the Internet, but it dismays me that it has such a stifling effect on these kind of articles.