"
Excuse me, many previous editors, including FA reviewers, thought there had not been enough biographical info. This article is not about ""his public life"" alone (which hasn't yet merited a separate article other than Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul), nor about ""his viability as a candidate"" (see Ron Paul presidential campaign, 2008). This is a biography and his private life ought to be weighted as fully as reliable sourcing and BLP permit; I have not seen consensus anywhere that anyone's family should be constrained to names and categories and dates. It is also properly placed in the article; where else would it go? Naturally a successful, vibrant 50-year marriage is an exceptional claim, fully sourced of course. No hard feelings, but I will probably revert much of this later under bold, revert, discuss, looking forward to an interesting discussion; I also have another source for additional of this. If, of course, you have any reliably sourced negative information, please state it neutrally here.   "