":Fine. You'll save my time - I don't get paid for teaching you on genetics. 
But for mediation to be successful you will have to show some constructivity and clarity of ideas. You have to be able to concede when others are right and you have to be able to understand and apply NPOV policy. 
Else we will be going nowhere. You don't seem to understand it but Wikipedia is a consensus ruled community. And consensus can only be achieved by honest constructive discussion, ability to accept others' viewpoints (specially when these are reasonable) and ability for compromise.
Andronico (the mediator) can't make a ruling: he's no judge nor referee, just a mediator, someone who will try to get our positions to gather at a reasonable middle or wider point. 
If mediation doesn't work, there are only three alernative ways:
Aplication of the supermajority principle (alternative to consensus when this is not available)
Arbitration (ArbCom)
Application of the Disruptive Editing policy what actualy leads to ArbCom and possible community ban for the disruptive editor(s). 
A solution in mediation is therefore desirable but it requires of some good will from all. And I don't really see it in you. You just talk like saying ""see you in court"". Mdieation is no tribunal though.  

"