I have tried multiple times, both at wp:an/i and at wp:blp/n, to enlist administrators to keep the article on their watchlist and to consider helping mediate on the talk page.  The only administrator who did attempt to assist was repeatedly attacked on his talk page for doing so and has yet to return.  At this point, I don't know of any other way to express my concerns that convey the sincerity and passion the issue deserves: it's someone life we're allowing to be framed here.  It's why the Foundation put forward such a notable Resolution.  It's why wp:blp exists, and why special sanctions and enforcement were put forward...

Yet venues for convincing administrators to roll up their sleeves and stick around don't exist, and watchlist coverage of controversial but not incredibly widespread wp:blps like Carly Fiorina are incredibly vulnerable regardless.  The issue is when someone, like Carly Fiorina, decides to run for a Senate seat, in a contest already projected to be the most expensive in the upcoming elections, we end up getting caught with our pants down here at Wikipedia because we just don't have effective and thorough procedures surrounding wp:blp in place.  Like what happened with Sarah Palin, coincidentally.  I've expressed this time and again, and my post at wp:an/i was the best I could do to convey what I believed to be the seriousness of the issue.  As I said, I don't know any other way to put it.  user:J aka justen (talk)