"

 Hello 

Hi Blu Aardvark, glad to see you did not permanently leave Wikipedia.  I was wondering why my Template:Current event template redirect wasn't working, couldn't see the obvious! )  — (talk) 2006-01-15 13:36Z

 Thanks 

Thanks for taking note of The Arcata Eye and Plazoid pages. 

Happy Birthday!

 Have a great day )   (talk) 

Admin Fighter
That was really funny, gave me a good chuckle. You should have just crossed it out and left it in.  (Talk) 

 ""Removing religious and political categories. Recent attempt at vote stacking leaves a bad taste in my mouth."" 

Were you referring to this: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Catholic Alliance of Wikipedia-like vote stacking?  (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) 

No. I was referring to a Wikipedia email I recieved earlier today, sent by  now.  

 policy proposal 

Hi, you recently commented on bible-verse articles, and may therefore be interested in commenting about a proposed policy covering roughly 50 specific verses:

Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Verses of 1 Kings 4 and 5

 

 Ubuntu Logo 

Blu,

I noticed you changed the logo for the Ubuntu Linux User Box.  Why?  The usage policy on Ubuntu's offical site clearly allows for such use. Besides, the logo is just that, a low-resolution image of a logo, which is allowed under fair use.  I am aware that some discussion has been going around about ""fair use"" images in user boxes. If you changed the logo to Tux because I labeled it as a fair use image and not with some other licensing information, I'm sure I can find an appropriate image copyright tag.  
At the time I had changed it, several ongoing discussions had indicated that copyrighted images and logos available under fair use were not to be used in userspace, per Wikipedia policy. The Ubuntu trademark policy may allow it, but Wikipedia policy (per WP:FU is to limit images that are not available for commercial use - which the Ubuntu trademark policy explicity disallows.  | (talk) | (contribs)  The preceding text was copied from User talk:Jcarroll

WP:NPA

Please review and adhere to WP:NPA, WP:CIV, and WP:WQT. Please re(?)-familliarize yourself with Wikipedia policy. Thanks in advance.  
I am fully aware of the above policies, thank you. I do not feel that it can be considered a personal attack, or incivil, to call a troll a troll. I'm sorry if you don't agree with me in that - but that does not mean that my statement is a violation of any of the above policies.  | (talk) | (contribs) 
It is a violation, and you must refrain from it. WP:NPA is non-negotiable.  
Funny. Nobody considers it a violation of WP:NPA to call User:Willy on Wheels a vandal. Nobody con