"::I reaffirm my position that the irresponsible publication of the unverified claims of the DI as if they were established facts is potentially libelous and a prima facie violation of the WP:BLP ""Do No Harm"" clause.  There are 102 other people who are in a similar situation.  

The analysis of the 2001 ad by Skip Evans establishes reasonable doubt that the claims of the DI are factually correct.  

 

"