I seem like an experienced wiki contributor because I am an experienced wiki contributor.  I am a volunteer administrator at LyricWiki.org (see http://lyricwiki.org/User:Kiefer), one of the largest non-Wikipedia wikis.  If you look at my contributions here, you'll notice that my first edit is December 26, 2007, and that most of my edits concern vandalism or music-related errors on pages that I have referenced for LyricWiki.

 Begging your pardon, but you really can't believe that I'm somehow trying to purposely derail you.  I mean, seriously...trained and paid?  Who would possibly train me and pay me?  Fake user accounts?  All but  have lengthy histories. (And all that user did was strike out one section - didn't even remove it.)  So, which do you think are fake accounts?  And how is what I'm telling you any different than what Cretog8 is telling you?

I have been civil, courteous, and have done nothing more horrible than try to be helpful to a new editor who I thought wanted to improve this article but didn't know where to begin.  Your comments, however, show a strong streak of paranoia, despite my repeated assurances to you that these changes have nothing to do with you or the subject.  (I'm still really not sure why you would even think anyone would be against you or the theory....) I think that you're upset because I called you on your non-neutral point of view.  For me, it's fine that you don't have a NPOV.  It's just that your writing must not reflect that NPOV.  That's not me saying that, that's the Wikipedia policy.