"
 So you agree that the debate is non-notable at all and the section can be removed? Whether absence or presence of something is ""invitation to escalation"" doesn't really matter. Either it's relevant and it stays, or it isn't or it goes away. So far I cannot see any evidence for relevance except for editors themselves doing creative synthesis of tidbits from various sources. No papers, book chapters etc. dealing with the so-called dispute.   "