"

 New pic  & non-journalistic references 

Hi all. A couple of suggestions for articles like this. If we must use media as the only references (at least in the short term), can we lose the meaningless journalistic terminology? ""14 times closer"" is meaningless (think ""twice as small""). Similarly, ""gray line"", and water and carbon dioxide as ""elements"". These I have changed, but I'm sure there are others. Finally, couldn't someone modify the stock image used at the end to show where in the potentially-habitable zone this planet would lie? (i.e. add a ball 1.5 times the shown Earth size to the lower left of the zone.) That would be much more meaningful than the standard stock pic shown now. Just a couple of thoughts.   "