Hmm, I'm not sure I agree with that. If you want to improve on the article please go ahead and come up with a new proposal, but simply removing content isn't very helpful. I remember hearing about that particular work by Oreskes in the national news where i live (not US that is), and it is already well referenced. (And, no, I've never heard of Preiser until now). So I don't think there is any reason to remove that information. That doesn't mean the article can be improved upon and her other works should be mentioned as well of course! Apis