"::::Dystopos apparently still hasn't read this article, which explains briefly why these implied analogies to other cities and, egads, University of Michigan (LOL), are utterly fallacious and fail out of the gate. it is normal that schools are not always in session. it is not normal, however, for new orleans, LA to have been destroyed. supposing that normal criteria necessarily apply to unique circumstances is the pinnacle of ""foolish consistency"". if the already illogical claim is to be made that what another article has done defines the law, then the example article, at least, must have gone through somewhat similar circumstances. Dystopos has yet to figure out that this disaster is unprecedented in recent U.S. history, and simply requires logical thought (i.e., perhaps new solutions) to sort out here. it's ridiculous for the article to describe as extant things which are not, or to ignore the catastrophe which has destroyed much of the city (the city described, allegedly, in this article). i think Moncrief nailed it quite well above in attempting to help edit opponents understand that what can be removed may easily be returned — when it's accurate again. neither hopes nor delusion can undo what has happened. please stop thinking of editing wikipedia articles as working with stone. surely the edit history of almost any article should give comfort that the opposite, thankfully, is the case. embrace it.  

"