"   
    
 ::Gren, not in my whole talk did I ever mention that ""images are not allowed in Islam"". It is your prejudiced thought that is again forcing you to be conservative and narrow-minded. The whole purpose for me to take part in this dialogue is to present my ideas that the posting of the depiction is unfair!!!    
    
 :::Hojimachong, I would much rather be happy to get a quick response to my argument by removing the false depiction thus making Wikipedia more authentic and accurate.  08:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC   
 ::::You ain't fooling anyone,     
 :::::No sock-puppet accusations. They do no good. If you have some information to that end deal with it with check user or however you must.  グレン    
 ::::::Checkuser instructs us not to bring forth obvious disruptive (e.g. one who engages in personal attacks) sockpuppets, who are instead to be unceremoniously blocked. Or do you disagree?    
    
 If you would care to read the discussion that has been ongoing for over a month, you would know that it isn't going to be removed because of the whims of one editor. talkcon    
    
 I still am open for refuting that tirade against me, Checkmeout. talkcon    
    
 :Since you seem not want to repost your rant on my talk page, I'll respond here.    
    
 :*Quoting me out of context isn't appropriate. The very next sentence was: ""I try hard to make Wikipedia be neutral, and not give undue weight to any religion, including Christianity."".   
""this encyclopedia is operated by narrow-minded individuals who least care about authenticity of the material posted on their website."" Considering the amount of time myself and other editors have spent on this page, your blanket allegations I find extremely offensive, though not as much of your allegation of me as a ""Christian-radical editor"".   
""I am sure that if you re-analyze the entire argument, you would find that the reasoning presented by most people in this little discussion board is fair, and a decision to remove the picture undistorted by emotion would finally be made."" For lack of a better word, this seems like hypocrisy to me. You ask me to ""review the arguments"", though you yourself demonstrate in your edits that you have not done this. talkcon ]   
    
Do you even think I care about you as an individual being offended when you do not care about several others being offended by the FRADULENT information posted by your website? My words could be offending to you in your understanding, but for me it is the TRUTH. And for Mr. Gren, you are the one who is falsely-accusing and forcing your own idealogies of ""images are not allowed in Islam"" to others. If anyone needs to be labelled as sock-puppet, it would be you. And dear friends, don't even bother to post a reply because guess what, I have left the building and I am not interested in continuing dialogue because I don't see any fairness from your side. There is a saying that, ""You can't straighten a dog's tail by putting in a hose pipe"" and that perfectly applies to you because no matter how much reasoning and arguments are presented, you would have your own preconceived ideas . Thank you and come again!    
    
I couldn't agree more. It is apparent that User:Hojimacho has a closed mind and no matter how many arguments are presented to him, he will stick to his opinions out of shear stubborness and ignorance. Thanks  "