"::Actually, you're not correct.  The letter I wrote above was in response to my discovering that Aeon1006 had started engaging in other ""roles of trust"" on WP, namely he is now a mediator.  The ""evidence"" that follows was copy/pasted from an AMA letter that was deleted and not responded to.  Aeon1006 never really responded to these allegations at all.  If I am incorrect, I would sure like to see a link.  I firmly believe that mediators should be neutral, and for the above numerous reasons, I do not believe that Aeon1006 can be so.  Furthermore, I do not believe that Doc Tropics can be neutral either, seeing as how he posted his opinion on an RfC BEFORE the accused party had even written a response AND because Doc Tropics was also an online friend of one of accusing parties.  I understand the need for your to ""stick up"" for your friend here, but there really is no basis for your accusations that this was ""mean-spirited attack.""  In fact, you're completely missing the big picture here - that Aeon1006 completely and unquestionably violated the trust of his client and turned against the very person he had promised to help.

"