"
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary, so it has articles about topics, not entries about words or expressions. This article is trying to cover an expression with unclear meaning, not a topic. That's the fundamental problem.
Specifically to your diff: I agree with the removal of these links. The first is not appropriate here because criticism of atheism is relevant to this article only because it is relevant to atheism and atheism is relevant to this article. The second link target is perhaps slightly more relevant, but still not relevant enough to justify such a prominent link from an overall topic to a TV documentary.
Perhaps you understand the problem better if you think about ""see also"" links to psychology of religion and Religion Explained. I guess you wouldn't be too happy about them. They would be just about as relevant as the other two, which means that they should also not be there.  Adler "