Article problem
Where did you copy the article on Gustavo Roman from? It's obvious from the internal evidence that it's from another publicationthe numbered footnotes for references you didn't bother to copy over gives the show away. It puts so much emphasis ion minor topics that , as reviewing administrator,I would be fully justified in deleting it as both copyvio and promotional, but since he is after all highly notable. I will rewrite it.

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously;  and does not accept material copied from other sources unless it is in the public domain, or released to us under a free license   (It is, by the way, not necessary for pages to have a notice to be copyright:  everything published on the internet or elsewhere is copyright to the owner of that content unless specified otherwise.) 

It might be possible to get permission, but there is no point in doing soa web site of this sort almost always is unsuitable for WP, because it is usually written as a press release, praising rather than describing the subject and containing material we would not include.  It is therefore always better to rewrite. 

Please never copy this way from an outside source again, and be absolutely certain that in everything you have previously written, there is not just no copying , but no Close paraphrase. If there is, rewrite that part from scratch, changing not just the words, but the arrangement into sentences and the sequence of ideas.  '''''' ( talk )