But I appear to be the only person who has ever seemingly read WP:CON before I feel able to claim to see a 'consensus'. You can not care about whatever you like, you don't care what WP:CON says just like you didn't care what the MoS and WP:NPOV said about the use footnotes. This is Wikipedia, and such willfull ingorance of basic good practises will only get you so far. And tinkering with pages that will never be Featured, is it, I'm afraid. I'm almost tempted to put this up for FAR, to demonstrate what would happen to it. It would be ripped apart.