"
 ""Refused to"" gives the appearance of knowing his intentions and his response to specific advice.  It expresses a point of view about his reasons for not taking security precautions (if indeed he didn't - there is a contradictory claim on the article's talk page).  ""Did not"" does not.  The Telegraph article does not seem to support the idea of an actual refusal to take security precautions.  I have now explained my edits in detail several times; ""wee curry monster"" has not bothered to give anything more than a vague, meaningless, unsubstantiated ""these details are relevant"".  His ""rv IP edits"" shows that he cares about the editor, not the edits themselves.  190.46.108.141  "