"

 Leave in Greenfield, MA 350.org Event Incident 

Since there are a whole list of *future* ""positive"" things listed, such as kids making pretty things, people on bikes with fancy armbands, and people planting trees, I thought it would not be out-of-line to list a negative event that *actually* occurred at a 350.org demonstration.  It's hard on the one hand to say that this event wasn't related to 350.org but then include all these other events that are just as related.  There are plenty of mentions of negative signs in the articles on Tea Party and 9/12 demonstrations.  Did the organizers of those events intend for those signs to be there?  No.  Are they worth mentioning?  Yes.  It's pretty notable that one of these events featured a threat to a person.  Bounties on private citizens don't go up every day.  This article is a lot like an ad, but I guess that's the intent of the most persistent Wikipedia editors. If it puts them in a positive light, it's totally relevant and notable.  If negative, it's not notable and totally tangential.  "