To KF
To User KF: Don't try to reason with Doc. He's unreasonable, a definite case of head in cement syndrome and possible abuse of his authority by just deleting without being sure of his right to act summarily. I noticed he's had more of his administrative decisions reversed by other administrators, most notably Remember the dot reversing him most recently than any other admin so far as I've seen. So just ignore him and reinstate the article with the tags you propose. He does anything to it again, either you can complain against him to the Arbitration Committee or to a more reasonable administrator for reversal of all his or her decisions. Judicial action would be a last resort if internal processes fail to produce a satisfactory result, but it's always a possibility. But go to User Remember the dot, he or she will likely give you a fair hearing, more fair than you get here. I imagine this guy will want to block me for this, but if he does, well I'll just appeal to the above named administrator, or sue him before an arbitration hearing here, or if needed as a very last resort, judicial action.   

To Doc
To whom Doc is: I advise KF to ignore your actions and denials of petition and just reinstate the article you deleted in its original terms and add the tags he proposes him or herself. If you delete it again, I advised him to complain against you before administrator Remember the dot to overturn your adverse to KF decisions or go to the Arbitration Committee with a complaint and if as a last resort, bring judicial action against you. Your abuse needs to be stopped. You seem mean spirited, crude and abusive of your power. I figure you're going to try to block me. If you do, I'll appeal to Remember the dot or Arb Comm, or last resort legal options which is something I don't relish doing, but is always a last card to play I suppose.