No, because then this article would have to be renamed Violations of IOC rules during the 2012 Summer Olympics, to better reflect its content. If it's a controversy that occurred during the games, it's fair game for inclusion here. Despite the ludicrous claims made elsewhere, this article does not, and never would have, contained every news story that happened during the games. And besides, all team rules are ultimately ratified by the IOC - who do you think is taking the moral/ethical lead on this issue? Do you suppose the IOC has no stance on Olympic athletes getting pissed after competing but while still at the games? And there is no logic to only including issues in this one that only affected the whole games, unless the goal is to make it impossible for readers to find information. Why should someone who wants to know basic information like athletes being sent home from a games, be forced to read 200 odd articles to get a proper understanding of the information?