"
TAB
Um thanks for your opinion, but it looks like you admit you are extremely biased in editing wikipeida. Can we please have another opinion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.93.26 (talk) 
TAB
That's been said of every president in memory. Not a germane or encyclopedic subject, more of an age-old slow news day preoccupation, it's like sending a reporter out to the local pool to take photos of children on a hot day. By the way, a scholarly article in JAMA contradicts the notion that presidents age in office.[34] - Wikidemon (talk) 
TAB
Two extremely biased opinions in a row!, but I digress on that. Wikidemon, in the source you linked, did the researchers take into account that some deaths might be accidental and not representative of effects of the so called stress associated with the presidency? I find this information very important and interesting observation and it is a substantial overstatement that Obama's health is fine and somehow ununique. Everybody's body has had a unique past and is unique at the present state and a result of how someone treats their body. The truth is that there is no such thing as normal especially given substantial genetic differences and the vast differences in lifestyle including diet, activity levels, and drug use, etc. Scjessey, do you have a source that claims that Obama's health is , in your words, ""perfectly normal and unexceptional"" And tell me the date of publication? I think I have a very good point given that researchers have decided that this topic is important enough to do large scale academic research on this topic. That in and of it self deserves at least a one sentence mention, perhaps not even in this article. Media outlets have reported this. Is there a wikipedia wide consensus that somehow a media coverage is not notable solely because it is, in your words ""as a matter of routine"" or is that your point at all?
TABTAB
...(REMOVED LARGE SECTION FOR CENSORSHIP)
TAB
I apologize for my formal tone, but I figure its best to be very clear when dealing with you. And I do respect and consider an it an underutilized tool for everyone to the have the ability to offer unsolicited opinion on wikipedia of another individual's possible biases. Are there any other opinions at all? Thankyou for your time. Let me remind you, SCJESSEY, that it is against wikipedia policy to say that another account holder's work is 'dumb' or 'worthless.'
TAB
Please tell me exactly where you disagree with this post if at all. Also please be painstaking clear and logical. Please do not call me a quack, WIKIDEMON. If not, please do not bother responding. Thanks and I look forward to your reply."