"

 Thanks for keeping an eye on just me neuro. )   

 oh, not sock puppetry but oh, oops, I meant reverts against consensus 

Ok, I got it,  made an error when he all of a sudden banned me for one week without warning.  It was originally for sock-puppetry (which was a false accusation in the first place) but he really meant the ban because his ""reason should have been persistent rvs against consensus"".  Again, where are these persistent reverts against ""consensus""?  I tried to edit an article about a bridge awhile back, got hammered by Noclador/Gun Powder Ma for adding citations.  Most people who actually looked at what I was trying to do stated I was editing very civil, and that these two were out of line of how they attacked me.  This time I'm trying to add back citations (and including extra ones) that show the use of Adesc Aut in Ladin.  Ok, there is disagreement if it is proper usage or not, what is new?  Noclador says he knows Ladin scholars who are adamant against its use.  Ok, get them to publish something and we can cite their opinions and add it to the article.  I do not care.  He has become utterly obsessed that I am part of some conspiracy.   It was originally a user from the Netherlands who added the Adesc Aut ,because there are a few Ladin websites that use the term.  i added the an official trilingual document from Ortisei using that term.  Are they wrong?  Maybe, maybe not, whatever, we simply cite references, we don't cite what someone told us down at the local coffee shop.  But, I dare edit any page in Noclador/Gun Powder Ma's domain, and I must therefore be attacked.  If I'm banned for a week, those two should be banned for a month for their constant bashing of anyone who edits the pages against the way they feel things should be.  No compromise, no sharing.. we are going back to the good ole' days.     "