I object to the complete paragraph, though for different reasons for different parts.  The first sentence is referenced, but by Slashdot's own website and not an independent secondary source, which is what is required for reliability.  The second sentence, on the other hand, seems to be pure speculation and original research.

I'd also like to remind you that any editor is welcome to remove any information on Wikipedia that is not reliably sourced, and if you want to revert them, it is incumbant upon you to provide proper sources.