"

In order to facilitate reference to talk page discussions, I will need to create an archive page for the talk page content that one of the admins previously blanked.  Is there any problem with that?  

You can link to a permanent revision in the history if need be, so long as the page was not actually deleted.  

As far as I know, nothing was permanently deleted, although some discussions have been moved to archive pages.  The other thing I need to exhibit is the blocking message that KillerChihuahua posted.  That one does not appear in any revision of this talk page; it appears on a template that I see on my user page, but I don't think others see that template.  How do I reference or exhibit that original blocking message?  

Just go into the history, and click the appropriate date on a revision.  That will bring you to a page, with a link.  Here is an example, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moulton&oldid;=157221709.

As an aside, what will you do if unblocked?  Do you intend to edit articles again?  

How do I link to something that exhibits KillerChihuahua's original blocking message, wherein she gives the reason for blocking?  

It's too soon to decide what I will do if unblocked, as that depends on what transpires during the course of these proceedings.  If the objectives I set forth in my RfC are embraced and endorsed, then it's reasonable to imagine that it would be feasible for people like me to contribute to the crafting of mainspace articles.  If those objectives are repudiated by ArbCom, then there would be no point in editing articles, even if I were provisionally unblocked on technical grounds related to denial of due process. 

I have one other question on how these cases are titled.  Is there any standard convention on titling these cases?  

this is your block log.  Tilting?  

Not tilting, but titling.  Do I entitle the case ""Moulton"" or ""Moulton v. KillerChihuaha"" or ""KillerChihuahua"" since she is the admin whose actions I am contesting.  

No vs.  You are verses anything.  You are requesting a unblock review to ArbCom.  ""Moulton"" works.  

I have filled in the RfAr Template, and (unless you spot any deficiencies), I believe it is now ready for posting.  Would one of you (Nathan or Anthony) please do the honors? Thank you.  
.  

Thank you!   
Notice for any observing parties, I am moving to unblock Moulton, after current attempts to seek reassurance from Moulton that he will not edit any pages except his user space and the relevant RfArb. sections/pages are complete.  
P.S., Moulton: check your email.  

I appreciate that you extended to me the courtesy of requesting that I directly and affirmatively express my intentions regarding your concerns.  

Also, thank you for posting the notices to the other parties.  Whose responsibility is it now to confirm those notifications on the RfAr template?   

 Request for Arbitration Template 

 Original scratchpad version of the Request for Arbitration Template.

 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&oldid;=177205578#Moulton Request for Arbitration as