"

The user Goldorack keeps on reverting the corrections ( 16:34, 19 May 2009 131.114.129.28 (talk) (86,388 bytes) (The Nagorno Karabakh Republic is a de facto independent state (hence there is surely ""such a thing""). The respective wiki article is cited.) (undo) ) done in the section concerning the Armenian monument controversy. In my opinion the sentence ""Azerbaijan complained to the EBU that the video clip was unacceptable due to the fact that the statue was on Azerbaijani land"" should read as ""... the statue is situated on a land claimed by Azerbaijan."" The land cannot belong to a country (Azerbaijani land) if the latter has no legal authority and physical presence in the land. In order not to go deep into endless debates about the legal status of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, I suggest a neutral formulation ""a land claimed by Azerbaijan"" favoring neither Armenian version (Nagorno-Karabakh Republic) nor Azerbaijani (Azerbaijani land)."