", but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
Materialscientist (talk) 
An admin can block you again now that you've continued to make the very same contentious edit that got you blocked initially. If you continue to make that addition, which multiple editors have removed, and if you continue to refuse to discuss the issue on the article's talk page, this is fair warning that I will notify the above admin of your end-run disruptive editing. Tenebrae (talk) 
Civility warning I

While we all offer edits which tend to improve the article, you need to exercise better caution in your edit summaries. [This] is not an example of civility; calling child is a fairly certain way to ensure your edits are met in the harshest possible light. In other words, knock off the bullshit sarcasm, or you won't like the ensuing discussion. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 
Allow me to be somewhat more clear: the next uncivil remark you make in an edit summary will find you taking a somewhat longer break than your previous block. We tend to block people for that sort of behavior. Consider my previous comment a request; consider this one a warning. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 
July 2012

The edits you have been reverting have not been made in bad faith, so they are not vandalism. You should also mind WP:3RR and your attitude. Someguy1221 (talk) 
Your recent edits

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes (    ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. SineBot (talk) 
 Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Juno Temple. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your last edit summary referred to numerous editors on Juno Temple as morons. This is unacceptable and I noticed you have been warned for civility previously. If you believe the other editors are acting improperly, then report them to the appropriate Wikipedia noticeboard. If it is a content dispute, please work it out on the talk page. Thanks. Safiel (talk) 
Further comment on article Juno Temple
In your edit summaries, you indicate that you are relying on IMDB as a reliable source. Please read the following brief guideline at WP:IMDB. As a user edited resource, IMDB is not considered a reliable source for making material edits to an article. However, it is ok to make an external link from an article to an IMDB article. I am not taking sides as to whether you or the other editors are correct as to the dispute on Juno Temple, but IMDB is not an acceptable source for making your argument. Thanks. Safiel (talk) 
Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Littleton, Colorado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 
August 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Scooby-Doo! WrestleMania Mystery without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! STATic message me! 
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.