"==Featured article review for Order of Canada==
{{#if:| for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare ""Keep"" or ""Delist"" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. You are receiving this notice because you have been identified as one of the top three editors of the article based on edit count.   

Edward VII, George V, Edward VIII & George VI
Howdy Mies. I believe Neelix readings of those RMs, isn't entirley accurate - particularly concerning George V. Anyways, I moved towards rejecting of country - because of the article James I of England.    

Succession
I've long taken the view that GoodDay's disruptive comments are best ignored.  I hope we can agree on that.  )    
Sometimes he can be disruptive; though, he's good enough to restrict it to talk pages, as far as I've experienced. But, then, we can all be disruptive, at times; I know there are people who think I am. Ħ  
""...he's good enough to restrict it to talk pages, as far as I've experienced..""  Lucky you!    
Stop stirring drama, Ghmyrtle.   

Proposal
Would you like to take a look at   
That's a good start. I thought the article could be more broad, though, covering all reform proposals and those that came up this year would be a subsection; a literal transplantation of Act of Settlement 1701#Amendment proposals to its own article, since the reforms discussed in that subsection actually encompass more than just the Act of Settlement. Ħ  
Sorry, I thought you weren't around.  Well, I thought that as it is these specific proposals that are going to be progressed, rather than the various past proposals, they should have their own article, with a small amount of background.  But I'm open to all constructive suggestions, and I doubt if I'll want to be that closely involved with the article as it develops (famous last words....)    
Okay; well, we'll see how it progresses/evolves. Ħ  
Somehow, I knew (sooner or later) you were gonna de-emphasis the United Kingdom. No worries though, I'm not gonna start an edit-war or a 10+ days worth of discussion.   

RE: EIIR Diamond Jubilee
umm, i didn explain my edits and removal, conversely you didnt explain either reversal, which per BRD means discus and discussion doesnt happen with an initiation of dialogue or reasons. Anhyway, i put it on the talk page.  18:16,