, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Minor misread, but understandable.  I'm not seeing a frame of reference in the target language (English) where this should be a topic of such rabid coverage; there's no basis in third-party refs in the target language at all.  As a matter of fact, there's really nothing readily available in English that the subject himself does not have a hand in directly, and I'm still not seeing how this meets AUTHOR.  Reliable sources in any language are fine, but we've got a lot more content here than in ro-wp, where there is (or should be) a lot more coverage. Tudor's article bears that out - there are lots of book references there in multiple languages, and I'm not seeing that here, even minimally.   04:44