I take personal offense to the term anti-science religious propaganda fluff piece.  That, sir, is borderline hate speech in the context you have attempted to use it in.  Cadedral is a personal friend residing in an entirely different country than I.  He happens to also believe that all facets of Paleontology should be represented in the Paleontology article as properly cited pieces of evidence.  And censoring the documented instances of fraud and scientific viewpoints of MILLIONS of Christians and YEC is irresponsible and only perpetuates the widely revered opinion that Wikipedia is a liberally biased engine.  What you are doing is injecting your personal preference into science.  Which is again, irresponsible.