The problem with that, though, is that it is NOT irrelevant.  Also, who are you to decide if it is important or not?  A quote from a public speech that generated a TON of public criticism surely belongs in the criticism section of George Bush.  Why do you feel that it doesn't?

Also, it is not a wikipedia practice to EXPLAIN why yuo place something in a specific section.  Do you see rationalization in any other article for WHY that information is there?  I DID cite my sources.  What have you contributed to anything lately?