"

Why did you delete these references from the pro se page?
1.)Why did you delete these references?

""The U.S. Constitution extends the power of the U.S. Judiciary to: ""The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls;to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;to Controversies between two or more States;between a State and Citizens of another State;between Citizens of different States;between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/article03/. However, some people think that the word ""citizens"" should not apply to pro se litigants in the court citation needed and a few years before the U.S. civil war, in Dred Scott v. Sandford the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the legality of slavery under the same constitution by declaring that ex slaves could never be citizens even though they were extended full voting rights in five of the original states. http://www.historyplace.com/lincoln/dred.htm'""

2.)Why did you delete this summary of table?

"" States that explicitly recognize a right to self-representation (without an attorney) in their constitution or statutes include Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York, Tennessee,  Utah and the District of Columbia.  States that use the words “every person” or “every subject” include Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming.  States that use the words “every man” include Delaware, Maryland, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and South Dakota.  "" (summarizes table)

3.) Why did you delete this reference?

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure addresses the rights of the self-represented litigant in Rule 17 ""The court must appoint a guardian ad litem — or issue another appropriate order — to protect a minor or incompetent person who is unrepresented in an action""http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule17.htm

Do you not think that the words ""incompetent person who is unrepresented in an action"" applies to pro se litigants?  If so why don't you just supply a reference as requested?

4.) Why did you remove the request for a reference from the statement ""While this creates double standard, citation needed The Judicial Counsel justifies it based on the idea that ""Judges are charged with ascertaining the truth, not just playing referree... A lawsuit is not a game, where the party with the cleverest lawyer prevails regardless of the merits.""

5.) Why did you remove this reference:

""although the court's decision required processing of a 150 page hard to understand complaint written by an attorney in Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 F.2d 240  (which was cited by 40 circuit courts and the U.S. Supreme Court in MONROE ET AL. v. PAPE ET AL., 81 S. Ct. 473, 365 U.S. 167MONROE ET AL. v. PAPE ET AL., 81 S. Ct. 473, 365 U.S. 167).""

6.) Why did you remove this Supreme Court reference:

""The United States Supreme Court ruled ""[n]o technical forms of pleading or motions are required,” and Rule 8(f) provides that “[a]ll pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice.” Given the Federal Rules’ simplified standard for pleading, “[a] court may dismiss a complaint only if it is clear that no relief could be granted under any set of facts that could be proved consistent with the allegations.” Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984). If a pleading fails to specify the allegations in a manner that provides sufficient notice, a defendant can move for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e) before responding. Moreover, claims lacking merit may be dealt with through summary judgment under Rule 56. The liberal notice pleading of Rule 8(a) is the starting point of a simplified pleading system, which was adopted to focus litigation on the merits of a claim.SWIERKIEWICZ V. SOREMA N.&NBSP;A. (00-1853) 534 U.S. 506 (2002) http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-1853.ZO.html ""

7. Why did you remove this reference (posted by someone I don't know):

http://www.representyourselfincourt.org
With a free e-book, links to online resources by state, and also motions, briefs, ple