":::::::::Hi Rhodes, 
Please read WP:UNDUE.
I've reveiwed the statement 'Dr. Michael Siedman a Michigan-based otolaryngologist who ""dabbles in herbal medicine"".' and I believe it encourages a biased view against the subject. The subject in question has two degrees in the field of nutrition and two patents in a similar field. I appreciate the fact that the writer used the words the words 'dabbles in herbal medicine' while writing an article but using it as a basis for the doctor's description, given the majority of articles to the contrary, would be wrong and against wikipedia's policies.
Think what would happen if people chose to replace Bill Gate's qualifications in his wiki entry with some other article that described him as a man who 'dabbled into computers' just because a lone article described him in this light. If you have more than one article with a similar opinion then a case may be made. But basing an entire Wikipedia page on the opinion of only one article is a violation of wiki's rules.
 

Kind regards  

"