Well for a start, giving articles accurate titles is policy. If you want to narrow this article's scope somehow, beyond the point where the current title would make sense to a reasonable person, then yes, a rename would be necessary. There are plenty of controversies that affect more than one team that don't stem from a conflict with the IOC for example (except in the wider sense that they organise the games, by which logic, every incident even single team ones, is then related to the games). As for the claim that incidents must be criminal, and that once you finish your event the rules don't apply, well here's a timely example of how that's wrong. The IOC of course have a view on nearly everything athletes at the games do, except of course in the cases where they're happy to let the NOC deal with it. That just about covers every incident where an athlete is sent home for non-injury reasons.