So the straw man first: CISA was rejected overwhelmingly.  Then it was conflated with the entire federal budget.  This is simply pork-barreling for campaign funds.  This is entirely beside the point.  The reason I brought this to a formal dispute was because you're removing the text rather than editing it.  I'll try to find additional material to supplement, given your incredibly narrow definition of what constitutes valid material for Wikipedia.  Can we agree that if I can find a direct amendment or committee involvement from Gartner, that will constitute proof-positive of what I had previously written?