"

No, the statement is accurate. It's a verfiable fact (for which there's no shortage of evidence) that there are no pro-ID peer-reviewed articles in scientific journals. The only controversy is that created by the Discovery Institute's list, which you first posted here before deleting it.

Discovery Institute claims there are peer reviewed ID articles. But the DI's list has been long debunked:  It's also easily verifiable by searching the relevant scientific pub DBs. Further, if you read the Kitzmiller trial transcripts, Behe, one of ID's top proponents stated under testimony that """"there are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred."", a fact noted in the judge's ruling and the article here. Based on Behe's testimony alone the DI's claim is discredited and supports the ""To date, the intelligent design movement has yet to have an article published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal."" sentence .  "