", 21 May 2006 (UTC)

I think the main issue with bias was that the paragraph appeared to be making a statement of fact. How many people reading this article actually follow the links to the sources cited? Not many because it would take hours. As the source is biased (and also notoriously unreliable) we shouldn't be uncritically adopting it to make statements of fact. If you wanted to say something like ""anti-BNP publication Searchlight has stated ..."" that would be perfectly acceptable, but I don't think it would add much to the article.  13:36"