"
|decline=Response In http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons it says ""Information found in self-published books, newspapers, or websites/blogs should never be used, unless written by the subject (see below)."" What was being cited was a newspaper. It says plainly in the policy that that is not sufficient. I didn't remove the claim that he was an ""anarchist."" I was merely adding ""self-described"" in front of it since there was no reliable sources. Maybe there is some policy that I'm not seeing but if so I'm merely mistaken. No one has shown me any policy to the contrary though. The response was just to block me for life. It doesn't make sense that I would be blocked for life without any kind of due process by a single operator over a dispute about sourcing. If anyone is given the benefit of the doubt it should be me for insisting that information be properly sourced. How can Wikipedia be considered anything serious if people can be blocked like this for requesting sources? What kind of joke is Wikipedia?  
 
"