"::Seems like implying that someone who has different polices is opposed to BSA is a collolary to the principle shoved at me when I tried to include rpoportionality numbers.  Here's the quote:

Let me give this an example, let's say I'm talking about the 2004 US Presidential Election. Suppose I say this:

""Only 60 million Americans (out of the 300 million Americans total) voted to re-elect President Bush."" 
This sentence is technically true, and it is technically factual, but it is also misleading and unfair to President Bush. The sentence implies that while only 60 million supported the President, the other 240 million didn't vote for him. This is technically true, but it's totally unfair and misleading. The fact is, most American's don't vote, and the majority of those 300 million were ""undecided"", not ""opposed to Bush"". And as we know, Bush was, in fact, the most popular candidate. So to say ""60 million out of 300 million total supported Bush"" is simply very, very misleading even if every word of it happens to be true.

So saying others with different policies are opposed to BSAis the same kind inferrence some were vehemently against.  ;-)  

"