"== Talk page archiving ==

With regards to your talk page archiving here and at Talk:Cherokee society, most generally, talk page archives contain months of content, not single comments.  I would reconsider your archiving system and move all of the old comments out onto this main page.  Archive every few months or set number of comments, like every 25 or 50 comments. Thanks. —  talk  

I do my archiving in this manner because I simply detest going to a talkpage and going through mountains of comments.  It is a waste of time.  I may need to have more comments on each archive page and can willing do that.  However, keeping talkpages tidy is a pet project of mine.   

I would argue that this actually makes review talk pages more complicated, because you must open several different pages in order to see the progression of comments on a talk page.  If this is your desire though, please only do so in your user space and leave talk page archiving in the main space to convention of larger comment blocks.  Thanks. —  talk  

I can go along with what you're saying.  Usually if I have a mountain of comments to read I most likely will not read them.  Going to another page just makes it easier for my mind to comprehend.  Of course I have medical reasons for this that the rest of you may not have to deal with.  But I will not go into that unless someone inquires.  I'll gladly keep my archive procedures to my own user space.   

 Merkey article 

Please take over my edits on the Jeffrey Vernon Merkey article and review the article for POV and Wikipedia:Reliable sources.  The article fails both.  Be careful, there are a large number of vandals
who will engage in revert wars related to the article, and there are several adminitrators violating wikipedia 
policies on primary and secondary sources by supporting them.  Be on your best behavior.  I am going to focus on other articles since they typically resort to sock puppet allegations to drive editors from the article.  We need more evidence on their conduct and edit history to review whether the article should be dropped from the indigeneous peoples article.  

Waya sahoni.  Who is Jeffrey Vernon Merkey?  I've seen the name and that you've been accused of being this person.  Before I go into this article please tell me about him.  My email is MythicWeb 

He is one of our brothers and a citizen of the Cherokee Nation.  The people on that article are members of SCOX, an Anti-Native-American Group who post hate speech against Indian Peoples.  These people have been posting a lot of negative content and POV pushing about him.  They acuse anyone of sockpuppetry who goes near the article.  Thanks for policing my user page.  Please feel free to revert it again  they are creating sockpuppets accounts and are warring with us over some discussion I posted to the Talk page. A very rowdy group.  They also accussed you of sockpuppetry and of being Merkey.   

No one ever accused Bookofsecrets of being Merkey.  I pointed out his admission and apology for past sockpuppetry and suggested that he should teach you to abandon that behavior.  The Yahoo SCOX bulletin board discusses the SCO Group stock and related issues, including Merkey's aid to SCO's cause and his business connections to them.  Claiming that they are an Anti-Native-American Group who post hate speech against Indian Peoples is both  libelous untrue and silly.  —  

My apologies for originally using a term which might imply a legal threat.  I will try to police my posts better in the future.  —  

You wrote (on  page) ""I have been informed by Waya sahoni that he is not a sockpuppet. Please use Good Faith."". Please, keep in mind that we have proof that he is the very same Jeffrey Vernon Merkey about whom  a federal judge  wrote (see ):
124. In fact, however, Merkey is not just prone to exaggeration, he also is and can be deceptive, not only to his adversaries, but also to his own partners, his business as