", 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Then we have a lot of Wikipedia articles and sections to remove. There are perfectly reliable sources to quote in both the current case and the case I posed. Avoiding ""the onus of fact-checking"" when determining what someone said, if it is said in a public and recordable, verifiable way, is just silliness. It is no worse, and no better, than quoting a newspaper editorial to verify what an editorial columnist said.76.31.236.91  23:55"