"
I merely meant, in my pre-amble to what I was saying, that I believed that ""assumptions contrary to that indicated in the reference"" should not be made, where there was not clear indication that the person had adopted the nationality of the place of their death. For example, if they died in New York, having lived there for 30 years, but were actually born in London England, surely the only assumption, in the absence of a mention in the source being used, is that this person would still be English (or British, if you prefer). There is little point in conducting pain-staking research, just for a tagline in a list. But let's try to be correct in what we put in that tagline, is all I'm saying. We can't mislead, surely. I didn't exepct this to go so in-depth - a mere ""yes I agree"" or ""no you're wrong"" - or even ""don't know"" - would suffice. Thanks for the input anyway. I'm none the wiser, to be frank.  (chew)(do) "