"
One could argue that ""personal analysis"" is misapplied when one employs a concept defined by wp to a discussion in wp about that very subject. What is the purpose of having a definition of ""massacre"" but then not employing it, particularly in controversial conditions? one might argue that by not addressing the wp defined ""massacre"" to what happened in Deir Yassin that the concept NPOV, another wp defined concept could be employed when the subject concept is employed. If wp defined concepts are to be abandoned then are we not left without a concensus on the very concepts we use to argue with."