"

I wasn't alleging that you'd requested that I be blocked.  I was warning you because if you delete my comments again, I'm going to request that you be blocked.  If you want, you can whine about that ""threat"" to an administrator, but I'm pretty sure it's not grounds for blocking. -   

Please take the time to look at the policies regarding civil behavior. You comments on the BSG:Daylight part 2 talk page have been less than civil in their content. Per the WP:Civil policy comments such as these can and will be deleted without such actions being considered censorship or blanking. The people you have been engaging in have tried, repeatedly, to maintain a professional tone in the conversations, while you have not. We are not saying that your points are wrong, but how you are going about this is, all we are asking is for you to wait until the time that such assertions you are making are confirmed by a reliable, third party source that verifies what you believe to be true. 

Your comments on my page also confirm your inappropriate behavior and do nothing but harm yourself, so please assume good faith when dealing with others and scale back on the tone and content of your posts.  (blah blah) 

Wikipedia's policy on civility is meant to remove threats, profanity, and personal attacks.  None of that applies to my comments.  But there are some parts of Wikipedia's policy on civility that apply to you.  It says, among other things, ""to treat constructive criticism as an attack, is itself disruptive, and may result in warnings or even blocks... It is not normally appropriate to edit or remove another editor's comment.""  Looks like that's another policy that you're breaking.  What is that now, four?  IAR, Use Common Sense, Discuss your concerns rather than engage in edit wars, and now the policy on Civility.  Are you going for a record?  I have repeatedly asked you to point out which part of my argument you disagree with.  You have failed to do so.  You're the problem here, not me. -   "