"@JamesBWatson

Maybe I missed something in your offer to help.  If so, sorry.  Completely reverting all my useful comments based on firsthand knowledge of the diet and its effects on my health did not seem helpful at all, since you decided you knew better.  Do you have any knowledge on this subject?  If so, please inform me.  Do you have cancer?

Also, please explain, for example, why ""proponents"" of Budwig's diet mention 6 or 7 Nobel Prize nominations when 7 nominations are clearly stated on the book's cover but you reverted this completely to make it sound suspect to another person's account that apparently has none of the doctor's books and is operating from internet anecdotes as valid citations.  The truth is that ""critics"" (apparently existing mainly on Wikipedia) have issue with the book's statement, yet this fact could not be allowed to stand, even though the un-updated online source was left intact.  This ""Nobel Prize"" section of the article is actually useless and did not exist in earlier versions; it should be deleted outright.

Finally, please tell me what references you expect to corroborate the minimal extra information I included (they information is contained in the her two primary books: ""Oil-Protein Diet"" and ""Flax Oil as ..."").  If you knew anything about the diet, you would find what was reported in this so-called encyclopedic entry embarrassing.  My point was to improve it so that other cancer sufferers would not be mislead into thinking this diet is some half-baked diversion and would seek out the books and learn more.  Please tell me what your objective is and why.

I'm sure you might already know that Wikipedia has a bad reputation when it comes to objectively reporting health information that conflicts with so-called mainstream approaches.  One full-time industry plant who was monitoring/editing Wikipedia articles (like this one) has already been exposed.

In any case, I hope your original offer was actually ""help"" as you stated and maybe this article can be improved by both of us.  My suspicions were high coming into this proposed revision and when I saw immediate reversions, you can imagine my concern that all I heard was true.

UPDATE
HOWEVER, since I find that I have been banned now, I think my point has been proven.

"