"

""Controversially"" is a perfectly acceptable word when describing the usage of ""conspiracy theory"". To put things simply, anyone using ""conspiracy theory"" in a scientific or encyclopedic context is trying to trick people, not trying to advance science neutrally. Funny you should say it's ""not clear what a dubious narrative genre is"" since that was your argument over on Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory. Another thing I find funny is this unclear dubious narrative genre can somehow be used to defend a phrase from a charge of non neutral presentation. In my opinion we should completely rewrite ""narrative genre"" but since your argument passed (for now) over on Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory we are stuck with it, sorry.  T "