"
Yes, I lost my temper over something of no great importance.  But, to be clear, my first edit was to revert what I saw as the removal of sourced material by an editor with very few edits.  Then, I reverted twice more, with what I felt were clear edit summaries, so I was not in violation of 3RR.  I had no intention of reverting a fourth time.  The other editor, Arzul, suggested I ""take it to talk"" when he reverted me the 2nd time, but the talk page discussion indicated he had been outvoted, which I mentioned in my 3rd edit summary.  When he reverted again, I lost my temper.  What I said to him was over the line, I admit that, and I am sorry.  Clearly, it was not the proper response. -The'FortyFive' "