"

Firstly, I would really like to thank you for your kind response here! ) As for me calling Rlevse ""racist"", that's what it looks like from the way he seems obsessed with keeping out any Lebanese claims. About edit warring: The edit warring article says this ""Edit warring is the confrontational, combative, non-productive use of editing and reverting to try to win, manipulate, or stall a discussion, or coerce a given stance on a page without regard to collaborative approaches"" and also, ""Typically a user who edit wars is ignoring editorial norms, reverting rather than taking due consideration of the points made by others."" But it also says: ""It states that a user who makes more than three revert actions (of any kind) on any one page within a 24 hour period, may be considered to be edit warring, and blocked appropriately, usually for a 24 hour period for a first incident"".
Now there was no edit war going on, on the article in question.

As you can see, my first edit was at  00:27, 31 August 2009 which was when I added the note. The edit right after that, was me, improving the note. Right after this second note, Rlevse reverts my edits. After he does so, I revert his revert and ask that he keep it the way it is while the topic is in discussion. That was it. There was no edit war. 4 Reverts = an Edit war. That was only 1!    "