"re:    ""TigerDirect has always relied very heavily on rebate marketing and this has been true, in the least, for several years, and their failure to honor them has made them as big as they are toda.""    That is baloney.   That statement reflects pure bias.   You can go count the number of rebates on TigerDirect.com and you'll find less there than you find on Amazon or Newegg or any of TigerDirect.com's other competitors.   Regarding the attorney general's complaint, you also have to note that in response to the complaint Tigerdirect argued that it's not true.   If you want to state that a company has used rebates in its marketing and has had public complaints about the fulfillment of those rebates then you can create a blanket statement and apply it to pretty much every computer and CE reseller in the country.

What is clear is that a whole bunch of editors have a hard on for TigerDirect.  Those who cry about others POVs and bias are usually the same ones who will stop at nothing to spread their ownwell-disguised under the heading of ""facts""  

"