" November 2007 (UTC)

Well, Guy, I was going to ask you why, if I have been blocked, what your interest was in it, and why there was no notice to that effect by the blocking administrator here on my talk page.

But then when I come to post that, I happen to glance at the jumble of a signature there and see that the ""Guy"" who was posting on my talk page was the same as the ""JzG"" who appears in my block log.

So then the question becomes, why the third-person passive-voice nonsense?  What's this ""Right now you have a block of 7 days"" stuff, as if you are informing me of someone else's actions?  You blocked me.  Just say soespecially if you are going to twiddle with your user name so that what I see in the notice is something different from what I see in my block log.  I almost mistook you for some well-intentioned soul who thought that he was going to offer to help out in some unspecified way in my reeducation.  Some helpful, innocent bystander with a ""Help!"" button in his signature for some reason or anther.

To say that one cannot raise an issue and claim, on a forum for making such complaints about the actions of editors such as WP:ANI, that an editor's actions have been rude and inconsiderate (or even aggressive, your word, if I had said that), is ludicrous.  It is totally contrary to all sense of fairness and due process, on Wikipedia or anywhere else. Raising such an issue is clearly not a violation of WP:CIVIL, whether or not in your subjective opinion  you can find some excuse for that actionbut you haven't even bothered to try to do that.

But you also seem to have entirely missed the point of the issue I raised at WP:ANI.  Rlevse's actions in disrupting the process are not wrong becasue he was incidentally rude and inconsiderate to me in doing so; they are wrong because they are bad for Wikipedia.  They are wrong because they corrupt the process of the various dispute resolution network we have.  They would have been wrong if he had been pleasant and nice to me and had tried to discuss things with me and actually accomplish something, rather than blocking me out of the blue.  The fact that he was rude and inconsiderate is irrelevant to that issue.  I even pointed that out there, and don't understand how you could have missed that.

You are instead assuming bad faith on my part, in addition to not paying any attention to the actual issues raised there.  You have turned a blind eye to the issue that was raised, just because, for whatever reasonand I don't have a clue what it isyou have taken a dislike to me. Not a good foundation for any discussion.

But then, you aren't really interested in discussion, are you?  No more so than Rlevse.  No, in fact, much less sohe didn't block me to keep me from responding to anything he had said. He merely didn't say anything, anywhere. You, OTOH, have blocked me specifically to stop me from addressing your response or anyone else's on the WP:ANI discussion, and the subsequent one on WP:AN.

The disruption of WQA was done to give an advantage in content disputes to User:Greg L, who had already had a Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts on his own actions at Kilogram, filed by User:Enuja in [this back on 1 September, before I ever got involved in that discussion there.  The issues raised then have continued almost unabated or even in a worsening manner, with a changing cast of characters other than the constant Greg L involvement, and remain largely unresolved.

 13:11, 5"