", 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, yes.  You two know that it probably isn't prudent for me to say much about him now.

Instead, let's take a different tack, okay?  
A challenge to those at WP:AN
A number of people have been discussing various moves by me.  In an attempt to help clarify the issues, I respectfully issue the following challenge:
Go to Wikipedia:Requested moves and make a request for Eduardo Perez to be moved to Eduardo Pérez, providing the proper discussion space on the talk page in accordance with the instructions at WP:RM, etc.
Then give everyone who has commented about my moving articles should be given a chance to weigh in on that requested move.  Put together all that collective brainpower, and more importantly, all that spirit of cooperative editing, to work to try to resolve the question of which of those two names should occupy the unique spot available for the article's name, in accordance with our Wikipedia:Naming conventions.
Consider what you could support based on the article as it stands today, with nothing specifically identified as a reference, but with two entries under ""External links"" to statistics pages.  Based on what I could see, in other words.
Look for and discuss additional sources of information, to support either the ""Eduardo Pérez"" spelling or the ""Eduardo Perez"" spelling.
Add appropriate references to the article, if they are ""reliable sources"".
If anyone who has commented about me in this regard hasn't jumped in of his or her own accord within a couple of days, seek them out and specifically invite their input to achieve the best cooperative result.
This will provide a wonderful opportunity to ""teach by example"".
Then, no matter where it ends up, we will probably accomplish one thing.  Those who want to talk about naming conventions issues will at least have some little bit of experience with and understanding for the potential issues involved.

History:  This article was started with the name Eduardo Perez more than two years ago, and remained that way until moved to Eduardo Pérez without discussion and no edit summary here 10 Oct 2007 by User:Kolins.  Later, I moved back the undiscussed, unreferenced move of the longstanding name. There have been no edits since, and Talk:Eduardo Perez is a blank slate, unused but for the ubiquitous WikiProjects and BLP boxes filling up a couple of screens.

Or, perhaps it would be even more instructive to add one additional step first.  Let Husond first show you how an old pro, one well versed in the workings of Wikipedia, would handle this.  Let him first move it back to Eduardo Pérez, then request page protection on the page.  Then, once that page protection is in place, you can request the move in the opposite direction, from Eduardo Pérez to Eduardo Perez.

Same encouragement of participation by anyone involved in that WP:AN discussion, of course, no matter which direction the move is requested.  All that changes is the burden of proof (something Husond is well aware of, but might not have been considered by everyone else). It might have some effect on the ensuing discussion or not, I can't predict what will happen in this case. Leave the discussion open for the normal five days or more, with of course anyone who is following the article just because they are baseball fanatics or whatever free to jump into the discussion as well.

That discussion, of course, ought to be able to proceed quite smoothly and amicable, since you won't have to worry about a disruptive character like me jumping in there. ;-)

Does that sound do-able?  Either direction, I don't care.  You choose.   19:13"