"

 thank you for your input... this is exactly what the ""article"" needed.  The parts of the article that are being removed are not significant parts and rather are blatant negative attacks.  While i agree that lying to prospective students is not correct, why must negative parts be highlighted?  Keep the ""facts"" (and i use this word lightly with this group) positive and help the school advance and produce better and more qualified physicians.  Prospective students can always call up their own state board, or the school's offices and ask questions.  If anyone has proof that the CURRENT administration or school officials are lying to students (prospective or current) about possible licensure issue or charter issues or anything for that matter then yes the school should have something formally brought against them.  From what i see the school has been and is currently being investigated by the GMC.  Should the GMC find problems that are beyond repair then the school will be closed, and then no need to bash anymore because the school will fade away.  Portraying the situation as constantly negative helps no one at all.  Help correct the problem instead of being a problem (I'm looking at 2 of you and you know who you are) and portray the positive side of things that several students despite this situation have gone on to be very successful.  thank you again for impartial imput.  3 August 2006 (UTC)

"