The administrators exercise very little, if any, editorial influence over wikipedia.  They have only intervened in a small number of cases; for example, they have never had any influence over the editing of this article.

Nevertheless, wikipedia is not an example of spontaneous order.  What is spontaneous about it?  It is not like a market, where (for example) a complex, highly-efficient supply chain might arise without any individual even being aware of it, let alone designing it.  On the contrary, wikipedia demonstrates no organization that has not been explicitly specified by some human editor.  Moreover, where is the order to it?  It is a random hyperlinked jumble (as it should be!).  Its only order is that it is separated into articles with titles, but that is hardly an order worth noting.

Perhaps it is the actual content of articles that is supposed to exhibit spontaneous order, but again I do not see how.  Every wikipedian adds his little piece, and the total is the sum of the parts.  Spontaneous order only occurs when something more emerges.