The info I tried to include from these sources is almost fully available from various alternative press sources, as direct interviews with involved persons or as review from reporters on the case. The number of such interviews and other sources will doubtlessly grow with time. So, there's really no need to use the particular sources you fight against so much. But, at this moment my feeling is that the majority of active skeptics here just don't want a neutral article about the subject, and I feel I've really done my best for Wikipedia. Maybe I should give you some more time to evaluate the case and understand that your position is biased, so I don't have to fight an epic battle for each small info I include. Or maybe life will bring about more info on the case. In either case, my feeling is that you don't deserve more of my time and attention here for now. Thanks.