":::::You'll need to explain the humour.  Jesus Seminar ""was organized to discover and report a scholarly consensus on the historical authenticity of the sayings and events attributed to Jesus in the gospels"" - it is the very definition of 'confirmation bias'. It's little different from ""the bible says it is the word of god, the word of god is infallible, so the bible must be the word of god"".  Apart from supposed humour, you offer nothing to explain the difference between one partisan website and another on the opposite side of the argument.   

"