"

I take a risk to get blocked myself by you as reporting the case to you instead of reporting at ANt. However, if that case happened, I expected to get blocked along with him, not solely myself. Positing ANI requires me to spend many time so I chose to let you know of this. I have not followed him at all because the articles have been on my list for over four months, because they're link to Japanese textbook controversies. However, I had not edited those articles until recently because I'm learning and reading step by step and the articles are too broad to catch up with. Rather, he followed my recent edits and followed me such as Kofun and Azuka period articles and accused me of making disruptive edits. I did not go shopping for blocking him because I followed a suggestion by the first admin who reviewed the 3RR report, so I put a review request. Can I ask you about your definition of these sentences? 'I'm certain that you should be removed from Wikipedia community"" is good faith edit? He really did lie about my edit which does constitute harrassment on me. You're aim to degrade Japanese articles'' are also a good faith and reasonable comment? Well, thank you for giving me a time to take a break.   "