-It is not an objection to your statement or to your civil dialogue.  As you can see from me and Maynard and others on the site, we believe the most interesting thing about Niles IS his untrustworthiness.  His comic book accomplishments are minimal.  The fact that he leaves psychotic messages for film producers and for artists after he steals their girlfriends IS notable and important for any Wikipedia users.  You continue to try to insist that this is some made up controversy.  It has been reported and commented upon by news sites
http://www.comicbookresources.com/columns/index.cgi?column=litg&article;=2467
http://www.comicbookresources.com/columns/index.cgi?column=litg&article;=2526
http://kudgoddess.livejournal.com/155442.html
http://www.comicon.com/thebeat/2006/05/steve_niles_stole_my_girlfrien.html
These links if you take the time to read them (and maybe include them) confirm the story.  
These links are to news sites that cover comic books.  They even interview Niles and the parties involved.
According to your seeming definition of encyclopedix, we would not mention that this Karr clown claimed to have been there when JonBenet died.  I am sorry and wish to remain civil.   I am not a vandal.  This scandal happened and this and the fact that Niles is a plagiarist are the two most interesting things about him really. 
 (talk)