As much as I appreciate getting the TJF minority view into the language, I still remain largely opposed to commentary and this sort of authorship. This will only serve to add more text to the commentary, inviting further commentary. I'm not against mentioning the minority report if it's only used to mention dissent among the TJF historical staff without getting into details. I would suggest appending one brief comment to this effect to the existing TJF comment. While we're on the topic of sources, ref's 198 and 199 still need to be corrected, replaced or removed. They've been like this for about a week now.