"

I found out he made some interesting posts on the ""Reason and Rhyme"" blog . I'll make sure the links find their way into the article.

Also, since I just discovered and subsequently bought Vaughan's book, I plan to add more details concerning his various personal and professional involvements in the following weeks. And after I learn how to correctly use the ""reference"" function...

  

 Page move from ""E.E. Rehmus"" to ""E. E. Rehmus"" 

While there isn't any sort of visible consensus as to how exactly his abbreviated name should be put, I just decided to go for the more ""normal"" approach and moved the page to its ""appropriate"" title. I doubt anyone would have argued strongly against it. ""EE"", ""E.E."", ""E E"", and ""E. E."" are all found here and there, without any kind of logic. Vaughan's book solely uses ""E. E.""; I therefore felt authorized to go along, even though Rehmus' full name probably is Edward Rehmusmeaning that the middle ""E."" could only be for aesthetic and/or numerological and/or symbolical reasons.

 Article for ""The Magician's Dictionary"" 

Should an article be made for his main ""oeuvre"" or should it only be redirected to this one? Since I haven't read it in its entirety, I feel a little bit at odds with the task of producing an article about a book whose content still eludes me. I feel that this brilliant book of his needs an article of its own. His work deserves more acknowledgement, more recognition. So many people have consulted it and been enlightened by its provocative stances and informations.

  "