"

After so much time, i think, we can finnaly understand this, a blast from the past...

This was not addressed: ""You have three texts, all AP from the end of January, not the beginning of the war, which mention in this context, 'southern communities'. The phrasing they used is identical. So you edit is referenced now. It remains for me, at least, to see whether that formula employed by the Associated Press reflects precisely Israeli government or IDF statements of intent expressed when the assault began on Dec.27, or whether it is retrospective."" -Nishidani 
Because if we DO go back to the beginning of this conflict(and we should when addressing the lead), we'll find the following: 
Dec 30 - Israel attacks Gaza for the fourth day - http://www.kbc.co.ke/story.asp?ID=54699 (from the BBC)

On goals(aim) - ""Israel's defence chief earlier said his country was fighting a ""war to the bitter end"" against Hamas.""

On whether to use 'stated' or not - ""Israel says its aim is to end the rocket attacks by Hamas-linked militants - of which there were reportedly more than 40 on Monday.""

Dec 27 - Israel's attack on Gaza kills hundreds - http://www.contracostatimes.com/california/ci_11323391

On goals - ""The government said the open-ended campaign was aimed at stopping rocket attacks that have traumatized southern Israel.""

""Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said late Saturday that the goal was ""to bring about a fundamental improvement in the security situation."" He added, ""It could take some time.""

""Stated""? - see above plus ""Israel warned it might go after Hamas' leaders, and militants kept pelting Israel with rockets - killing at least one Israeli and wounding six.

Dec 30 - Israel Assaults Hamas In Gaza - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/27/israel-launches-air-strik_n_153664.html

On goals - ""Israel's stated goal is to cripple Hamas' ability to launch rockets at Israeli towns, which means that a ground invasion is becoming more likely as it becomes clear that airstrikes alone cannot finish the job.""

""Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak has declared ""all-out war against Hamas.""

""Stated""? Yes. But infrastructure? and since Hamas fire those rockets from civilians area, not having military bases of their own, police stations and houses in gaza are Hamas' infrastructures?

I recognized Nishidani's point as being that from the beginning there was ambiguity as to what this Israel's attack was to bring Israel itself. Now there was a target inside Gaza, Hamas, there is war, but is war about what? goals? yes to some degree, but most of those goals can't be archived until conquering has been archived(re:Iraq war, AND Israel's previous occupations of both Lebanon and Palestine)...so to cripple Gaza, only Hamas's ""infrastructure"" was the ""stated"" goal?

At what point, even Israel's foreign minister was at odds with what the prime minister was ""stating"" as the goals for this operation.

Needless to say then, it would be a great disservice if we use Israel's ""stated goals"" as of Jan 30.

My humble suggestion is to leave it as ""The operation was aimed at..."" Stated is a loaded term.

There should be even more discussion on this BTW. Cryptonio (talk) 

Plus, Dec 30 - ANALYSIS / Hamas is hoping for an IDF ground operation in Gaza - http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1051024.html

On goals - ""The operation's goals, as defined by the cabinet, are ""creating a different long-term security situation in the south, while bolstering Israel's deterrence."" The IDF does not interpret this to mean a complete end to the rocket fire, as it considers this impossible. Rather, its goal is to eliminate Hamas' desire to attack Israel. The bombing campaign has so far dealt a severe blow to Hamas.""

Fire in the hole. Notice ref to ""as defined""(so they are defining what they are stating? or vice-versa?) plus IDF does not interpret what's been stated(which of course was defined before it was stated) which at the end, they disregard what was stated for them(perhaps rather just defined, in order for them to interpret on their own?) because they found what was 'defined' for them impossible(or what they interpreted as being defined to them). Cryptonio (talk) "