"
Do you consider NPR inflammatory? The source you cite used the headline ""How A Little Lab In West Virginia Caught Volkswagen's Big Cheat"". It not only says they were caught (gasp!) it says they cheated. It seems like if you disapprove of such language then you should be telling us to rely on sources who don't say caught, cheated, or illegal. I've already posted long lists of links from your New York Times, Telegraph, Guardian, WaPo and other upstanding media who all say it was illegal, they did cheat, and they got caught.Can anyone cite sources who question whether it was cheating, or say maybe it wasn't illegal, or they didn't get caught? We've got to stop twisting the truth away from what our sources tell us. We are not treating ""both sides"" fairly when there is only one side and the other side is a fabrication, a straw man we created to support an imaginary neutrality. Follow the sources, don't water them down to a false equivalence.   "