1) You're not reading properly. I've asked you what evidence there is I am continuing to engage in WP:Battleground behaviour.
2) No only some of the content is, the majority of the criticism is about the stuff that the contributors of counterpunch write. 
3)What? Who is making these vague praises, have you looked at the some websites fences&Windows; have put up, the praise for CounterPunch is substantive. Again, just another excuse for censorship.
5) What isn't true?