"

The previous comment of the article states that MOC was not re-established in 1993, which is a fallacy. The MOC has been legally registered in Montenegro in line with the valid legal system of the state of Montenegro and in line with the laws in Montenegro - which is clearly apparent from the MOC page on Wikipedia. The MOC Church is called the Montenegrin Orthodox Church in its formal registration in Montenegro, so there is no space for speculation here. The Church was re-established after a separate existence until 1920 and a ban by the Serbian (then Yugoslav) autocratic King Aleksandar. 
The article does not claim that MOC is a major branch of Eastern Orthodoxy outside Montenegro. 

The statement ""over 74% of Montenegrins are Eastern Orthodox Christians, most of whom belong to the Serb Orthodox Church"" is anyway a fallacy, as there is no accurate census that can prove this. One may say truthfully say that ""most Montenegrins are Eastern Orthodox Christians, most of whom belong to the Serb Orthodox Church"", but a large number of Montenegrins are atheists, agnostics, or otherwise, myself included. Being a Montenegrin does not mean that you are part of the 74% of Eastern Orthodox Christians. Sorry, this is the 21st century.

You can not just delete the fact that MOC followers claim that ""all of the existing churches in Montenegro were once part of an autonomous Montenegrin Orthodox Church that was abolished following the union with Serbia in 1918."" This is the explanation why shrines are not being built en masse in Montenegro by the MOC, as it claims to inherit the churches currently in the hands of SOC. If we put only one viewpoint in ""its following is small to the point of non-existence and it has not been recognised by any other Orthodox Church"" it is not balanced. Also, the statement ""its following is small to the point of non-existence"" needs to be based on fact not fancy. Do you have an official census of followers or is this your speculation?

- user 20:28, 04 Oct 2005 (UTC).
"