As one final point, seriously, why not just open up an RFC? I think that categories should only be used when they're 'objectively accurate' (rather than 'possibly accurate', 'accurate, subject to a specific interpretation', 'contrary to first-party references, but more or less in line with what more third party sources believe than do not', etc.). Either 139.57.240.18 agrees, or at least thinks this version is equally valid. For the sake of argument, I'm going to assume that Diego won't approve of swapping in one LGBT category for another: even four people still isn't really that much. Particularly since people tend to ignore that 'other stuff exists' rule, and might end up using this as a precedent. So why not do an RFC? Or, heck, just ask for advice at the village pump? I'd argue that even four people agreeing wouldn't be a fantastic consensus. So how can three or four people disagreeing form one? 72.88.42.215