"
Stop violating my talk page and blocking my user Chick Bowen and vandalising and deleting its contents who ever you are. Your actions are a discrace to Wikipedia and you should be banned immediately for displaying bad faith here  Fact Finder2  

Get a grip mate, so you werent breast fed eighter as a youngling? you must also be one of these Wikipedia un friendly admins who is a liability to this Encylopedia project  
Hello everyone, I was forced to create a new user account because Guy Chapman deleted my user profile and talk pages from the Fact Finder account, again.
Read the reasons on my new talk page,I was forced to create a new user because Guy Chapman wiped out all my user pages and records and spammed me and blocked my user!!!
youre sounding like Guy Chapman again!, Give it a rest Guy I thought you were a Christian (rolles eyes)  

 User Un-friendly Administrators 
Anyone interested in having a look at what's going on here may want to check this link to my previous user talk page which concerns accusations by Guy Chapman that I am supposedly a spammer which is a false accusation. Just because I have been evaluating whether I should start contributing in Wikipedia or not, does not make me a spammer. All I have done is to try ""replace"" factual information which I have written that was deleted and hence turned into fiction without any discussion in an effort to give a totally distorted view of events concerning EC0PAVE by this and ""other"" administrators. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fact_Finder,  

What exactly are you doing here?  

No sorry, Im trying to put a notice on the page for reasons why it should be deleted,  

But you are making hundreds of posts on a page that is no longer current, I'm not sure what your goal is, I just ran into the page by accident, and nothing makes any sense.  

Its ok now, im sorry Armadillo ive finally worked out how to place a notice on a page which I am requesting for removal, maby thats what happened, hundreds of posts? no no, I have only placed a removal request on three articles in question have a look at my contrib log,  
Oh I know what you are talking about now, yeah youre right in a sense because when I was editing (writing) the article on Accusations that EC0PAVE has spammed...I made numerous edits, I know I know, in the future I will write them down using my word program and spell cheker first before I add articles to a Wikipedia page, Im learning  
This is what I added to the help page but someone has deleted it today  ,

I am still waiting for the deletion of these 3 articles on the grounds that they have been edited to a point where the facts have become fiction and these three remaining articles serve no other purpose except to make the company EC0PAVE and people look bad and they dilute the trademark protected words Trademark dilution and the article is in bad faith;
EC0PAVE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk_archive/Miscellaneous/2006_October_16
Walled garden /spammers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive140
Advise to new users regarding libel and Trademark law TABhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2006_October_22

 Accusations that Ecopave Australia has spammed in Wikipedia are incorrect and false 

Why am I responding to these accusations? because this could also happen to any one wanting to contribute into Wikipedia, I have raised some serious issues that if left un-addressed, could potentially cause serious harm to someones professional or academic reputation as a result.

My understanding after what I have been told by EC0PAVE, is that their people wanted to contribute into Wikipedia ""in good faith"" by adding articles about their company and products in the same way as many other companies have done in the past like for exampl