"

 Request for help from some honest administrator 

Request for help from some honest administrator

I apologize for contacting you in this way, I asked a friend to do it, please read and you will understand why:

I was very unfairly treated, please help me, here is what happened. I tried to post this at the debate but my voice has been strategically silenced so I needed to ask a friend to go there and ask for help.

The True of this story
 
After having heard many users (if in true are many and not a few posing as many) asking me to see it from Wikipedia's point of view or even from other user's point of view, I will give here my point of view, lets see if someone has the courage to say he/she understands and the determination to stand out of the crowd.
 
I was having a normal quiet Wikilife since a few weeks ago, I joined groups, I edited and was collaborating in the whole goal of Wikipedia.
Yesterday, I had a disagreement with user Durin at the talk page of user Demon, about the validity of existing a category for users who have chosen to be nice to newcomers
One hour or less after, user Durin ""coincidentally"" ""finds out"" that the humorous pictures I uploaded to my page, all of which were my work and in good  tone, are (or so he said) in other places in Internet 
I was told and was written since the first log by user Durin that I ""believe that I can download artwork from Internet and have rights on it""
I requested immediate preventive deletion and I declared that the work is mine
I asked user Durin to tell me who and where is using my work, that is, where he saw it
User Durin said that the artwork was deleted and that is all, the matter was closed
I informed user Durin that I needed to know where he saw my work so I could take legal steps against who was using my artwork
User Durin said (absurdly) that I was threatening him with legal action
I said in more than one message that the legal action referred to whom, when and where was using my work, not to him
User Durin started to say that I was harassing him
Some of Durin's supporters (who some may be alter egos) showed support at his talk page and mine
I decided to see who was user Durin and read his works
From about 30 or more articles authored by user Durin, I tagged four of them because missing references and citations
Durin and supporters (some of who may be alter egos)claimed harassment
I spoke about the problem on the phone with the Dean and she advised me to let go and to contact e-pol.org, an agency that has helped them previously on matters regarding copyrights violations in the Net.
I followed advise, handled the editions of those articles to other editors for avoiding conflict of interests and wrote a polite message informing user Durin that I had abandoned my query with him even if he did not provide at any time who or where my work was used, I added recognition and 
apologized for rudeness and also that then I left the matters in the hands of the recommended agency and that unless he wanted to help, he didn't need further involvement given that the agency would sort out who is using my work.
User Durin misunderstood my message and panicked (by reasons only known to him) and ""retired"" from Wikipedia informing so at his page. Also please be aware that reading user Durin's pages, he has been ""threatening"" with retiring for a good while, seemingly using this situation in good timing.
""Coincidentally"" an administrator's attention was called by the issue and blocked me for legal threats (please keep in  mind that these existed only in the interpretation of others of my words and not in precise wording and less in my intentions)
I requested unblocking and I was requested to prove that no Wikipedian or Wikiorganization was involved in any legal action
I asked the agency I reported the case to, to please inform Wikipedia about their no involvement, they did so clearly saying that the case is against sites using my work and neither Wikipedia nor any editor is involved in the case.
Far from the block be removed, the administrators not only left the block in place, in spite of no legal threats existed, but also questioned the existence of the agency handling my case
In the most ""interrogation"" or better said ""organized crime"" fashion, I received administrator's messages that I must tell who they are or I will remain blocked. It seems no longer the block obeys to policies about legal threats.
User Durin, while ""retired"" and showing so at his page, left messages in the blocking discussion page (my talk page) warning administrators to not lift the block (curious retirement)
The block is now justified by the administrators involved saying that they are investigating if the e-pol.o