I got the consensus at the Photoshop article.  The spirit of the debate should be on the GNU informative article about Photoshop where the Photoshop people can read the source.  It is the GNU tradition!  As I write this, it says directly below the authoring window You agree to license your contributions under the GFDL*. And here, the source should go where the competition can read it as well.

 I feel sick for Photoshop when I see them stooping to sell their wares on this article.  I also don't know which consensus you queried, but I would like the information that is presented on the articles to be similar  not the applications.  I really really disliked photoshop when I tried it.  I really had no trouble using it and I was able to show the purchaser of the application somethings about how to manipulate pixels and she showed me some things.  I am really so bored with hearing that GIMP is a wannabe when it is clear at least here on wikipedia that Photoshop wants to be mentioned at the article GIMP.   Who is the wannabe?  Also, any news about when Photoshop will work on *nix?  It seems like all of that money spent for purchasing the application, that it should have been running on *nix long before GIMP was running on Windoze and Applez.  Do not put it back here without also putting it on the Photoshop page.

 Photoshop, GIMP's once strong competitor tries to harvest a purchasing population from the GNU Free Documentation Licensed Article for GNU Image Manipulation Program.  It is sad.  Please leave Photoshop restored to the economically enabled beast that it was!  carol