"

 Reverts new changes while it's being added and still edited 
Reverts changes all around, no discussion before taking action. Claims I removed/blanked stuff in S.M.A.R.T article. False claim as proven by edit history. I added HDDScan, then changed style to match the rest of the table. That doesn't constitute blanking an article or removing data.
See comment below ""I don't know what program you're using, but it is clearly not functioning properly"".

Suggest to author to switch to less trigger happy program. Sorry about the previous remark since it's clearly your automated revertion script that's trigger happy not you.

Also claimed "" never provided any edit summary describing your changes"" As you can see my first edit had ""+HDDScan"" which meant ""adding hdd scan"". So the change was described. Further minor edit of changing a color of a column that I just added to match the rest needs no long descriptions as it's obvious to anyone bothering to press the compare button. 

Reverting without looking at what's being reverted is vandalism.

(Edit history typo fix: ""Stated that I did describe my first article changes"" -> ""Stated that I didn't describe my first article changes"") As you can see I makes small errors at times, the edit button is there to fix this. This type of fix doesn't warrant description. Your automated revertion script should compare the last edit to the last edit by different user, not the last two edits by same user. Complain to the Huggle author if it shows only last two edits and start paying more attention to what's being reverted.)

I recommend admins to look closely at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gsmgm
With such high rate of reverts/minute it's possible that quite a few mishaps can happen leaving many frustrated CONTRIBUTORS (rather than just automated revert scripts). Special:Contributions/88.112.189.85 User talk:88.112.189.85"