"

Firstly, I don't think it's appropriate or constructive, when you label my edit ""a dangling half-innuendo"". I refer you to WP:CIV and AGF. Afterall one could argue that your removal is POV pushing. Secondly, if you feel, it is undue weight or needs expansion, then you could discuss that. The truth is, if of any interest to you, that I happened to come across this article while researching something altogether different and thought, if this was a long persisting claim by some, that she didn't write it, then it should be added. It required a section/subheading. Instead of removal you could've moved it. I don't mind expanding, though it appears you know more on the topic than me. You claim above and in your edit summary that the rumour was debunked but you provide no source for the ""fully established"" claim. I didn't write the article but the article explains, what it means, fairly well. Hopefully you can incorporate this into the article.   "