Wow 

Way to assume, my man.  I'm not saying that all of the stories about King Arthur were true, but Excalibur was a very real sword, and I do have it in my possession.  This is an irrefutable fact.  I have been interviewed by many historians and the like, and you're the first one that seems to think you know more than all of them.

Can you prove that I'm wrong?  Not only that my sword isn't the real thing, but that my claiming it is is such a travesty, that you cannot allow anyone else to see it at all?  I wonder what would happen, if the other Wikipedophiles got their poor little minds corrupted by a comment on a talk page, eh?

Referring to [].  Next time, do some research.  I won't bring it up again, but it's insulting to have someone like you treat me like a liar.