"== Square Rools, ok? ====
(For the non-British readers, ""xxx rules, ok?"" is a typical bit of graffiti to be found painted on walls in the UK, expressing a preference or admiration of xxx"" - eg a football team. Often misplet ""rools"", probably intentionally)

Guys, gals... We're going to go round and round forever here. For a section that is designed to merely state the very simple concept of a Hasse diagram, it might as well be a section about which religion is the true one for all the controversy it has stirred! 

 Someone (Gabe?) said the pyramid was too complex to see the incidences in non-vertex notation, so we should use a simpler polytope.  That I agree with.
 
 Steelpillow wants non-vertex notation, okay, I can live with it, given the previous statement.

 Now the square is ""naughty"" because it's regular and self dual, not to mention its number of vertices and edges is a perfect square and the first non-composite. Okay, we could use my example of an amorphic polyhedron, but then we're back to rather complex and unintuitive diagrams. 

 Frankly I really don't care for clickable popups. If it's necessary for the concept, it should be there all the time. If it's not, why clutter the article?

We don't have to (and nor should we wish to) teach all there is to know about AP's in a single section, and in fact Queen Elizabeth looks likely to become Britain's longest-reigning monarch. Less is more - a section should stay on-message. I will in due course expand the regularity section by giving examples of irregulars. So can we move on to other topics? I'll be soooo happy if anyone can answer any of my ""Unanswered questions"". But thanks for all the suggestions!   

=="