To the anonymous poster, you should feel free to adjust the tone of the article if you feel it is biased and I would encourage you to do so.  But facts are facts and these issues can be found on the Merck labeling information and in published articles.  JFDWolff has a very strong bias and has been keen on removing some of the factual statements in the past where he should focus on adjusting the tone, but I would welcome you to alter the presentation of the facts in such a way that you don't feel compelled to initially take a stance either way.