"please research into feminist periodicals on superiority ==

Feminist newspapers and booklets may have reported, quoted, or published well-known feminists as proponents of superiority or supremacy (likelier the former), particularly in the late 1960s and the 1970s. Many such papers had largely local circulation in various locales with some copies arriving nationally and some are available now in microfilm in libraries (at least, Bell & Howell published Herstory: Women's History Collection (microfilm)). Best wishes and thank you very much.   

 please research What Women Wanted, in Stanford Observer 

A specific source on superiority that I don't have is Freedman, Estelle B., What Women Wanted: Varieties of Feminism in Nineteenth-Century America, in The Stanford Observer, Jan., 1978, perhaps pp. 3 & 7 (The Stanford Observer published by Stanford University & since renamed Stanford Magazine or The Stanford Magazine (news.stanford.edu)), which is cited in Offen, Karen, Defining Feminism: A Comparative Historical Approach, in Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 14, no. 1 (Autumn, 1988), p. 125 n. 12 & 139 n. 43 (pp. 8 & 22, respectively, in PDF viewer software) (JStor or JStor's stable URL, both as accessed Aug. 28, 2010, 2:48p) (author was of Institute for Research on Women and Gender, Stanford Univ.). While Stanford University's library probably has this on hand, it appears to be rather costly to get a copy, and, as far as I know after checking WorldCat.org, no copy is near me. I hope someone has a copy and can edit the Wikipedia article accordingly. It is also very possible that the superiority referred to has nothing to do with women governing whole societies, but perhaps is only about a ""moral"", biological, or essentialist claim to superiority and not governance. Best wishes and thank you very much.   

 please find critiques of supremacy generally 

Criticisms of the superiority or supremacy position are implicit in most equality claims, but they probably should be articulated. At the moment, I don't think I have them (except for what I've already added to WP plus some to come on matriarchy). Preferred are two kinds: those by feminists (there's probably a passage in an interview of or an article by Betty Friedan, for example) and those by antifeminists (although some likely exaggerate and conflate all of feminism with superiority aspirations and object to the whole, rather than state a specific objection to superiority per se). Best wishes and thank you very much.    (Corrected the syntax of the first sentence to conform to that of the next sentence: )

 whether Les Guérillères community intended as relatively modern 

I think Monique Wittig's Les Guérillères, the 1969 novel, was meant to be relatively modern or futurist, and thus so was the proposed female state. This is suggested by the words ""rifle"" and ""bullet"" in the novel (Wittig, Monique, trans. David Le Vay, Les Guérillères (1985, © 1969), op. cit. (cited in the draft), p. 141 (""rifle"") & p. 132 (""bullet"" & ""bullets"")), in contrast to an existing interpretation of the fiction as Amazonian, probably meant in a sense other than ancientness. The ages of the English words rifle and bullet, about 2–3 centuries (per Shorter Oxford Eng. Dict. ([4th ed.]), could be irrelevant if her original French words, whatever they were, were old enough and meant ancient weapons or weapon supplies used for war. To avoid this factor being deprecated as original research from a primary source, is there a secondary source about the feminist state's intended time frame other than 1969?   

== "