I have also offered to strike or reformat it. I have tried showing that I am willing to attempt to change and make my comments abode within policy. I am being declined on technicalities and accused of using technicalities . I am not going to say the Arbcom decision decision was justified when it wasn't. The actions are reminiscent of a communist form of government or a inquistion I believe that I've exhibited a attitude that says I disagree, however I am willing to make changes. Reread the entire thread. I made one sympathizing ocmment to a webpage, I was blocked quire questionably when I exhibit that he block isn't needed. What I fail to understand is how I can argue unblock without being accused of wikilawyering. Wilf made a specific point and linked to it. I read it and there was a clear exception, I offered to refactor, or change the phrasing. How is that not exhibiting a block isn't nec?