" address.  If he vandalizes from IPs, we block them for short periods (to minimize the risk of affecting innocent people).  If you spot other obvious sockpuppets, though, let me know and I'll block them for you.  Best,  (talk) 

 Joseph Szigeti 

Hi there! Would you mind taking a look at the Szigeti article and giving me some feedback? I put it up for peer review a few days ago and all it got was a review generated by a bot. The only comment that I found useful was that I can sometimes be too wordy, there are apparently still redundancies and peacock termsbut I can't see any of that stuff in my own writing right now, I need someone with fresh eyes to look at it. I'm hoping to put it up on WP:FAC as soon as possible but I also don't want to nominate it before it's ready. Thanks, talk 

Looks good; it's thorough and reads well.  As is my nature, rather than listing a lot of nit-picks, like they do at the Featured Article Pillory, Good Article Gauntlet and A-Class Inquisition, I uncapped my nit-picker and picked the few nits I found.  Optionally you could expand the ""reception"" section; there's lots of commentary on  Szigeti's playing, and contrasts with his contemporaries  oh, you know, everyone from Kreisler to Heifetz to Nathan Milstein might be interesting  none of that is necessary, though, it's just something I might do if I were writing it.  I wondered about separating out the ""family life"" section from the main biography, since you cover the ""bureaucratic entanglements"" part twice, but in different levels of detail, but if you stitch that into the main part of the biography it could overwhelm it, so ... maybe fine as is.  Good article!   (talk) 

Oh, one other minor thing  I eradicated a lot of ghost hard returns, such as   I hope I didn't inadvertently bork your paragraphing, since the paragraph is together in the visible text but appears to be split in the edit window.  I assumed the lines were meant to be together.  (talk) 

Thanks for the nitpicking, it was exactly what I wanted you to do. ) I've had the same thoughts about the ""Reception"" section, just not really the time to go paw through the stacks to find interesting little tidbits. Any ideas on what books would be most useful in that regard?
I meant to take out the now-redundant part about bureaucratic entanglements, must have just slipped my mind. Completely mortified that I got the poor man's date of death wrong this whole time, btw... talk 

 Hard times? Hard spaces! 

Hi Antandrus. Sometimes tells me you could use a little distraction from Beethoven and your other recent concerns. I invite you to shift your gaze briefly to this transcluded text:
  
– Noetica♬♩ Talk 

I like it. Nice work; fine idea. I commented on the talk page, and added my name to what I thought was the appropriate place.  Thank you for the nicely timed distraction!   (talk) 

Thanks! We will need wide support from admins and master editors as we move this forward. Good to know that you see the value of what we're up to there. I have taken the liberty of including you on the list of participants. Feel free to remove that, of course. But your presence is highly prized!
– Noetica♬♩ Talk 

 Re: Speedy deletion 

Sorry ( didn't know. Yes an indeed very bad thing they did.  (Talk to Me...) 

Good to run into you again, and again beating me to noticing. -) Hope you are well, also  and thanks for the assistance! Cheers,  (spill your mind?) 01