", 4 May 2009 (UTC)
I disagree that there is a ""consensus"", when there are so few editors involved in the discussion. Certainly the views of SPAs can be safely excluded; nevertheless, I have decided not to continue to argue my point. You have utterly failed to explain why keeping a perfectly good reference out of the article is a ""good thing"", but I no longer have the will to argue against the majority. Sometimes the senseless outnumber the sensible - that's probably how Bush managed to twice get elected.    02:04"