"

To jmabel: ad hominem: I had no idea who wrote the original text and I dont care who Dahn is. I was describing a superficial course of events: someone consistently removes reference to Moldova  without apparent reason while keeping reference to Romania. (especially funny was logic: ""no, pieces of moldavia are not in moldova, but in bessarabia, which easily reads: ""there is no moldova, there is part of romania stolen by russia"", no?). You yourself wrote: ""enormous vocabulary difficulty here"". My point exactly. Conflation of two different although related topics in a single article only contributes to this difficulty. Putting two sloppy text into one page does not help understanding. The topics are perfectly separable along the timeline. `'mikkanarxi "