'Neutral POV' in conflict with mainstream scientific consensus? 

This article, like all Wiki's, purports to have:-

i) 'Scientific focus: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and its content on scientific and quasi-scientific topics will primarily reflect current mainstream scientific consensus.'

and

ii) 'Neutral point of view as applied to science: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, a fundamental policy, requires fair representation of significant alternatives to scientific orthodoxy. Significant alternatives, in this case, refers to legitimate scientific disagreement, as opposed to pseudoscience.'

Surely there is already a cultural bias, in the West, reflected in its science, which effectively imposes some kind of Conversion therapy (or its opposite?) on its citizens: there is a manufactured consensus, arrived at by undemocratic and concealed means, that 'it's okay to be LGBT,' which doesn't come clean about the physical and social consequences.80.229.223.248