"""Would you agree there is nothing in your suggestions that justifies calling the article in its present state an ""advertisement""?  I think we can continue to work on it, but the tag can be dropped."" - I don't agree with this statement at all.  Right up until the article was locked, I was removing brochure language - see my edits.  As Diana pointed out, there is more brochure language that needs to be removed.  What concerns me is that if the article is unlocked, your ""team"" will try to undo all the edits that brought the article closer to a non-advertisement.  There's a lot more to be done here not even counting reverting the edits I know are forthcoming from the Waldorf support POV lobbiests.  Again, the brochure-like language of the article has been in question here for at least three months and the Waldorf project team was supposed to address this.  The best way to address this, however, might be to have non-Waldorf people look at it instead of a project team populated with Waldorf people.  Why not show some good faith and not force the removal of the tag while the necessary edits are taking place?  Just a thought.  

"