Yes, and within the last month, the article has been significantly pared back to a reasonable, stable version. There are still areas of dispute that need to be addressed, however.  I'm still not exactly clear why GW insists others should preserve specific content in the daughter articles when there is nothing stopping him from moving it there himself.  For me, that's a bone of contention.  Editors are not required to preserve content, so if that's something he wants to do, he needs to do it himself.