(1)I've read a lot of wikipedia stuff, such as various guidelines. (2) No, Rob has no such obligation to provide an email address. I never implied he has such an obligation. (3) And he may well be within the guidelines, who is to judge ? Anyway, I didn't start that discussion, and have felt from the start on safer ground by taking the discussion up from the viewpoint of the integrity of science, as I explained. If the voting system page is ONLY based upon notability, and doesn't accept reasoned argumentation, as Rspeer holds, then a scientist would want to see it deleted since it misinforms the general public about the conditions for democracy.