"Hi again, all.  I wasn't too clear about what Piotr (and now M0RD00R too) wanted me to look at, Piotr says that it is this section he was mainly concerned about.  I mentioned it below, but I have a bit more to say and will be clearer.  I don't think the Boddenheimer stuff is acceptable.  Nor is the ""Polish independence following World War I was accompanied by a wave of pogroms and discrimination against Jews.""  They just don't have enough to do with the topic of the article, even considered widely.  They're OR, SYN, will raise blood pressure and are fattening to everybody's girlish figure. 

We come again to the crucial question of what is this article about, to which I add another distinction: (a) ghetto benches considered narrowly - this particular discriminatory measure  (b) Discrimination against Jews in education in Poland (wider)  (c) Antisemitism in Polish universities, in Polish education (widest).  (b) or (c) seem to be reasonable, popular choices. This is something that people are just going to have to think hard about and come to a consensus.  What is OR depends on what we decide the article is about, since it is clear that we are using ""ghetto benches"" a bit figuratively.  Changing the title is a possibility. Under (c), but probably not (b), the replacement from the notes that I suggested, the quote from Meltzer -""In fact, ever since the attainment of independence, the universities in Poland had been strongholds of Endejca supporters and centers for anti-semitic agitation.” would be acceptable. Again, I don't see how Boddenheimer or ""Polish independence . . .discrimination against Jews "" fits in under any reasonable conception.  

"