"

I'm not supporting somebody who is damaging the article. In my view, both of you are attempting to push a POV in the article. The fact that you are inserting sourced POV doesn't stop it being POV. My warning to you was on the basis that you are attempting to send another editor away from the article. 
Montanabw is allowed to edit text that you introduced, and isn't required to keep his/her text distinct from yours. 
Whilst you may well have included the veterinarian's credentials, did you mention that she is connected with an animal rights group. If not, you are being selective to further a particular POV. 
Mayalld (talk)  
Retrieved from ""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:HatAct""

Facts, observations  not POV. Facts and observations from professionals qualified to speak on the subject - Animal Abuse in Rodeo. Yes, I referenced the veterinarian's statements, directing the reader to the animal welfare site. Her professional observations are posted at an animal welfare site. Her observations were sourced. I don't know if she is a ""spokesman"" for the organization, I don't know if she is ""connected"" with an animal rights group. Maybe she is maybe she isn't. Maybe she's the president, maybe she's just a contributer. How far do I have to research a veterinarian's background before including her observations on Animal Abuse in Rodeo in an item about Animal Abuse in Rodeo?

I'm not sending anyone away. Where did I say ""Get out of here""? Mbw is not contributing in a positive way and needs to source her contributions. In one instance, he/she made sweeping statement with a footnote. The footnote supported absolutely nothing in the statement. Is Wiki a collection of misleading info? While I agree that Mbw is allowed to edit my text, he/she is not improving it. And why is everyone having a problem if I edit his/hers? He/she is tweaking mine to subtlely reflect her pro rodeo POV (""animals are practically never injured, abused, bruised, broken, maimed, or killed in rodeo"") or to invite the reader to dismiss mine as the contributions of an ""animal nut"".   "