I have so little time to devote to this today. So far, I’ve spent my entire morning dealing with this editor. He just got through having it clearly demonstrated to him that it was at least 2:1 (probably 3:1) consensus against his wishes (he’s the only hold-out so far). Notwithstanding that, he restored all this deletions of entries that GFHandel and I have told him are inappropriate. Maybe you can try to straighten him out that such bold moves must first be discussed and a clear consensus for them agreed to before wholesale deletions of material can be made. The discussion is here at Talk:List_of_computer-aided_design_editors#Complaints_over_unfair_removal. Please check his recent edits. If he persists at what is increasingly looking like disruptive editing against consensus, this may have to go to ANI. He seems to be convinced that “his views of *the facts*” trumps “consensus”. I have to go for the moment; real life needs tending to. I’ll be back this evening. Thanks for your efforts so far on this, your above digging up of citations (that is really helpful) and whatever may happen with Duncan today. Hopefully too, GFHandel will weigh in today too. Perhaps you might want to wait until after he does so…