Mr. Tanthalas,

Please help me understand.  You were not involved in teh talk discussions, and edits I completed after learning Kuru stated my entry was promotional.  So what refernce and evidence did you use to block my edit access and state my comments were unwarranted harrassment?  I do not want to appear argumentative and certainly want to comply with the rules of Wiki.  You also refered to my act as vandalism which I think is harsh and unwarratnted.  If you check with Mr. Kuru I think he will tell you were were having a legitamit discussion and my edits, subsequent with his deletion were inetnded to comply with his request to remove promotional material.  I simply subsequently loaded a link to the approved patent on the USPTO patent site.  It provides substantial reference, teh approved business method patent, prior art, abstracta nd claims.  I think your actions were premature and showed you lacked informationa bout what was being discussed between Kuru and I.  I would still like to refernce the patent and since it had previously been done and sanctioned acceptable because it was on teh site undisturbed for 2 months I think this has merit.  I do see the fact that my name, as teh inventor tends to promote thepatent.  However, if you check I am not the owner.  It is owned by Ultimate Claim Solution, Inc.  My refernce also tried to explain that aspect.  Non the less this all could have been avoided.  When someones content is deleted the person making thatd elrtion should point out in there csignature they are an administrtor or moderator.  Had Kuro done that I would have talked to him first instead of trying to update the edit to what I thought ws not promotional and then trying to engage in talk with Mr. Kuru.  

Lastly, I respectfully request you release the block.  I aslo request that I be given permission to return the article to the annonomus post which refernced the patent.  Those observing will not note that I am ihe inventor.  It is not promotion, simply good refernce and citation.  The insuarnec industry is apposed to patents and there are many executives who beive it should be open forum programming and business method patents are not unique inventions.  The USPTO thinks otherwise.  My patent was approved.  I look forwared to your resonse.