"
The lead section is a summary of the main points, but it mentions her involment in  the Puerto Rican Defend Fund using the political code word ""active"". I object to this description because I know many ""extremely involved"" and ""active"" lawyers and she doesn't fit the profile. According to the Washington Post ""The organization's board had a limited role  at bimonthly meetings... it generally left the legal tactics to the dozen or so staff lawyers....""I wouldn't describe [the board] as a bunch of firebrands...Her social activism does not shed light on whether she has, as a trial judge or later on the appellate bench, been a ""judicial activist""  the derogatory label conservatives sometimes apply to liberal jurists. 1. But I don't have time to edit or discuss so I supposed is your call, after all your are the ""active"" and ""extremely involved"" editor in this article ;) ''''''mundo "