Your closes go against consensus and your arguments misrepresent the facts (as do your false accusations). I would be interested on your opinion of why an entire article in a German periodical about the subject of the article doesn't assist in establishing notability (along with the dozens and dozens of other articles) but it seems that you aren't interested in abiding policy or engaging in reasonable discussion. I cited your comment above, you then claimed the additional links I posted came after your comment. You were mistaken as the timeline demonstrates, you were also wrong ab out the count in the UEFA discussion unless you want to include an argument that was solely about process and didn't address any aspect of the subject's notability or the AfD close itself. You owe me an apology, but you seem to be too arrogant to realize when you fouled up, so I can only hope that you will wise up going forward.