"::::In the light of my continued and ignored insistence that the subjects concerned cite their arguments in Wikipedia rules and they simply refuse to, here's how it's done.

Pertaining to ,  and . I will not be Gamed. RE: ""Gaming the system means deliberately using Wikipedia policies and guidelines in bad faith to thwart the aims of Wikipedia."" That's how you support an argument to limit endless bantering. But why would they want to limit endless bantering when indeed that's what they seek to create. Doing so is an act against the cornerstone doctrine of Good Faith Specifically,  ""Assuming good faith is a fundamental principle on Wikipedia. It is the assumption that editors' edits and comments are made in good faith. Most people try to help the project, not hurt it. If this were untrue, a project like Wikipedia would be doomed from the beginning."" THAT'S how you argue a point.  

"