"

   I'll change those in a minute, thank you for looking it over! For your part, here's what I found:

You wrote ""...of all elements in a products"" It isn't gramatically correct, it should be:
""...of all elements in a product""

You wrote ""Elements such as colour tone,..."" The official name of the element is just colour, and should remain like that to maintain it as a professional reference.

You wrote: ""Therefore it is in the product designers best interest...""  You're missing an apostrophe, it should be:
""Therefore it is in the product designer's best interest"" or ""Therefore it is in the product designers' best interest""

You wrote: ""Keeping in mind about how consumers ..."" It's convoluted, it should be:
""Keeping in mind how consumers...""

You wrote: ""The solution to that is to create a product, that in its designed appearance and function, expresses..."" In order to make it flow better, since the commas here are used as a parenthesis, it should be:
""The solution to that is to create a product that, in its designed appearance and function, expresses..."" That way, if you were to take out the part between the commas, the sentence would still flow.

You wrote: ""...subject to peoples judgment..."" You're missing an apostrophe again. It should be:
""...subject to people's judgment...""

The comparison you used about the pretty and abusive person seems a bit out of place, maybe pretty and rude would be a bit better?

But apart from that, I liked it a lot! I will get to reading the last two sections, sorry for the long list, they're minor things really. And I agree with needing a more appealing image to represent the page.

To add, Cassandra, for the book I used, I actually used a slideshow from my Design Thinking class, which references that book, so I wasn't sure what to cite it as, does anyone have any ideas for that? As for the format I used, I just used the automatic cite button at the top of the editor."