The debate on the deletion under G7, begun at 07:40 UTC on 4 November 2006, did not throw any light on the applicability of rule G7, as most respondents confined themselves to other considerations (notability of the subject, suitability of the article for Wikipedia, etc.).  No one managed to disprove the applicability of 
the CSD G7 rule, and it should have properly overridden all other considerations.  User:Charles Matthews admitted, in a remarkable access of frankness, that the whole matter at hand was not about Wikipedia policies at all but about his personal sense of injury (writing at 13:08 UTC 8 November 2006, ‘But that’s entirely to do with editors not wanting to be abused’).