"

There is nothing to discuss because there is no logical reason given for the removal of this paragraph. If the article is ""too short"" in your opinion then you should lengthen it, not shorten it even more. Where is the precedent or rule at Wikipedia that says if an article is short you should remove any negative, documented history from the article? The logic is absurd. I can very well say the article is too short for a section on recent fundraising and just decide to remove that. What compromise are you looking for? I readded a link to the article and a very brief paragraph and apparently that is too much for you and that ideologue ""Derex"". You removed the item, YOU need to give a logical explaination for your actions. The article is too short doesn't cut it.  "