I see you reverted posts commenting on your deletion of a portion of ip 71.190.64.84's post which quoted and cited a positive entry you made to Flewis' talk page, and my notation that perhaps this was improper (deleting non abusive substance within an editor's note on your page); I see in your deletion history you wrote history does not mean bias; I note that my post (deleted by you) included another (quoted) post of further communication between you and Flewis that was also indicative of a further positive relation history; it is my view that deleting my post on this topic was not helpful, but posting your reply on the talk page would have been preferable.  Either way, my response is that positive relationships can create bias or the appearance of bias, which appears to be one of the many issues this talk section touches on.  My two cents.  Deletion of other's posts when they are not vandalism is not conducive to good editing or atmosphere, I suggest.  Especially when the deletions are done so quickly and the argument to which they refer remains up.  As to your attempts to prevent people from posting without signing from an account, and calling such ip posts suspect sockpuppets, I cannot disagree further and believe wiki policy backs me up in this.  Good day.  (I also note ip posts, like accounts, are anonymous, each in different ways, and some easier, some harder, for different users to adapt to.  It is the user's choice, not yours.  Please note I am not seeking a response and you should feel absolutely no obligation to do so on this latter point - there are blogs for that I'm sure!)96.232.226.87