"
Noting that it was hardly ""vandalism."" Any psuedo-intellectual can pretend he's some sort of PhD online and somehow use that to justify walls of ridiculous text. Not that you aren't a PhD, of course, but you can see how easy it would be to make something like that up. Also, this isn't a ""Troll"" it's just a look at a different point of view of how easy wikipedia's weaknesses are to exploit when anybody's claims to expertise can't be checked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.178.85.44   "