"
I haven't even read his latest reply at User talk:142.161.182.190. Maybe I will read it a few days later and reply then. But it's fruitless replying to him because he's so stuck on the fact that he's right even in the face of overwhelming evidence that he's wrong. He thinks like this. He doesn't understand at all that we follow what the sources say, except for when it suits him. And that he insists that the information in the Lesbianism in erotica article about studies showing that men are more sexually aroused by lesbian pornography than heterosexual pornography makes my head hurt. He acts like we are presenting opinions as fact, when all we are really do is presenting the findings of several studies  not one, but several. In his opinion, we shouldn't include this information because he doesn't consider the evidence strong enough. Yet he considers ""just googl[ing] the most purchased adult videos,"" ""see[ing] what they're about"" and this ""would correspond to male arousal quite well"" to be strong enough evidence. Most heterosexual men buying heterosexual porn doesn't mean that most heterosexual men are more turned on by heterosexual porn than lesbian porn. 

Regarding everything else: Writ Keeper, your ""but it was not to be"" wording made me laugh. Thanks for that. Dennis Brown, I saw your advice for User:MikeFromCanmore at User talk:142.161.183.162. You certainly do give the benefit of the doubt, but being open to giving someone a second chance is (generally) a good personality trait to have. As for User:MikeFromCanmore still posting as IPs, I feel that his posts should just be removed each time he posts them...unless posting them on his own talk page. By leaving his posts elsewhere, he is repeatedly getting his way. I've considered getting a registered account, but would rather not (no comment on why that is). 220.255.2.133  "