"

Does continental philosophy deal with ""problems""? I thought continental philosophers were more interested the Freudian and Marxist neo-postmodern psycho-social signification of metaphorisms, although I'm sure that Derrida would point out that such a summary misses the socio-linguistic element of antiredeconstructionist ethics. Seriously, what would the counterpoint to ""Unsolved problems in analytic philosophy"" be? ""Unsolved ramblings in continental philosophy""? There are no ""problems"" in continental philosophy. Continental philosophy *is* the problem.  "