"
I agree. Some of the speculations need to be trimmed down and attributed. I'm removing the second section on Moore's law, as it seems especially speculative (I've no idea where those numbers are from). Moore's law itself is too significant to cut out entirely, but I'll try to ground it more in reality. I'll look for some sources for the bits in the ""Singularity technologies"" heading. As for the article being ""uncritical"", I'm just not seeing it. There's decent-sized section of attributed criticisms. —  03:16, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)"