Yes, ignoring is probably the best course of action in these cases so far.

Y'all know ... I've been doing some reading of my own, and am seeing a bit of a pattern. In any case, perhaps 'they' will actually be true to their word. Again (sigh):

I will be referring this dispute to a more appropriate forum, and will no longer be involved in the dispute myself. — KieferSkunk (talk) —  

...and leave this 'dispute' - as I keep asking - alone this time. We'll see. 

But you won't leave it will ya? I don't think its in your nature.

 If you're still around, I'd really like for you to explain in one small paragraph... that's called 'egging it on' KS.

 'n I take this as code for 'inconvenient truth:'

 (not this drawn-out mess of one-line responses to other people's comments taken out of context).

You, remarkably, when you came on the scene, posed as a 'mediator,' as far as I can see. There are others, outside of me, have asserted that you can pour the equivalent of gas on fires. I have reminded you of this, earlier:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:KieferSkunk#Disruptions_at_Integral

Later, this year, in November, Friends over the UK are meeting in seminars on 'Building Harmony.' You would be most welcome. Perhaps you may see the world as not quite like you appear to want to view it.

Apologies if you find the language 'elaborate.' I call it 'reasoning' and, trust me, I find it just as difficult to reason with y'all ... being partial to Truth m'self.

Now ... am I dismissed ...?

'gards ...