":Hi Virinchi, There are a lot of problems with the article in its current state, which is why this page has been so quickly nominated for ""speedy deletion"" again. btw, instead of tagging that as {{proposed deletion}}, if you are the original author of the article and no one else has made major contributions, you can tag it with {{db-self}} which makes the process much simpler. Here are some suggestions 

Don't use personal pronouns like 'we'.
Don't use sentences with heavily connoted and unverifiable words or phrases like ""...leaflet campaign, which took the city by storm."" or ""The effect it had on the first IPL match was fascinating"" Instead, simply say the result of the leaflet campaign (to the extent verifiable by your source) in a neutral voice eg: ""In preparation for the next IPL match, No Dada No KKR used leaflet and sms campaigns, and purchased tickets off would-be match attendants to encourage boycotting and create artificial scarcity which resulted in lower turnout in the cricket match."" Note that even this sentence has a problem: 'lower turnout' can't be verified by that source because it would be quoting an obviously biased primary source.
Don't say things like ""greatest ever captain"", sentences like this are clearly expressing an opinion.
Don't use slang like 'kids'.
Don't discuss the future (WP:FUTURE)

I think the reading which would help you the most are WP:WORDS and WP:NPOV for help with the non-neutral tone of your article and WP:N and WP:RS for properly citing and providing evidence of notability of the group.

Best of luck,  Rodney 

"