"

Radnath Sikdar
Dear Mr.Hike,

Thanks for your notice/warning/intimidation! Since, I could sense an emotional outburst in your message, I thought it would be worth spending a few seconds calming you down )

Please be careful in your edits
Oh sure...Iam always careful. I do not send baseless assumptions as warning shots to anyone ) 

Regarding Radhanath Sikdar: I think you need to realize that Wikipedia is a collaborative work - we develop articles by consensus. 
Thanks for your enlightenment. Unfortunately someone already taught me this fact a long time ago when I first ventured into this wikipedia ) Thanks anyway.

Simply reverting edits is counter-productive and against the etiquette of the Wikipedia.
I think this is your POV! There is a 'revert to previous page' button. May be your highness should dismantle it.

Commonly, we iterate until we can find language and fact statements that are acceptable to everyone. Notice that this iteration isn't a ""reversion war"" - people discuss and change and adapt the article until consensus is reached.
Another POV again ) By the way - could you please enlighten me about who your 'we' refers to in all the above sentences?

Please explain why you are insisting on ""now called"" in the Sikdar article, or, for that matter, why you are insisting on the mention of the name ""Sagarmatha"". There may be a legitimate NPOV reason for the inclusion of both - without explanation, I am assuming that it is motivated by Hindu nationalism.

I must appreciate your exceptional ability to assume things. Fortunately, I am not a religious fanatic. But, I do know that provocative sentences like this fuel hatred and anger in the hearts of those groups you mentioned. Again I may be wrong. You know all ) But, I do feel that there is no 'present day sun' or 'present day moon'. That was the only impetus behind my editing it. Besides I also thought that there is nothing wrong in representing a fact (name 'sagarmatha'). Again you know all. 

My assumption very well may be incorrect, but no explanation of your reversion has been given. Convince me.
I confirm that your assumption is not only untrue but is provocative and preposterous. Sometimes even highly intelligent people like you do mistakes )

Note that the original name of Presidency College (in Calcutta, founded in 1817) was ""Hindoo College"". Not ""Hindu"" (as in the religion). Please stop reverting. It seems to me that if you insist on using one of the original names of Mount Everest, for consistency you must also use the original name of the college. Convince me otherwise.
As far as I could remember, I have been taught that the right spelling is Hindu, in India. Could you please let me know the difference between Hindoo and Hindu? By the way, could your highness ) please let me know how you assumed that I am an Hindu? I again appreciate your astrological prowess! Astrology is many a times fake - just fyi your highness )

I do not know why messages like this from people who know everything, makes me a little sad sometimes. I am envious of the brilliant people like you who can assume a boat load of stuff with just a two-line edit! 

We can continue this discussion at Talk:Radhanath Sikdar: that way, many people can participate.

Thanks for your attention. - hike395 03:35, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)"