"
No it doesn't. It misrepresents the source material on multiple levels. ""Some of those colleagues take issue""? It says it infuruates his former collegeages. ""Heated""? Now, here's your POV exposed.  You're going to characterize the tone of Lopez's comments? And what's with the use of legalese? ""Testimony?"" ""Attested"". What courtroom are we talking about here? ""not acceepted by the majority of his colleagues"" It says that his theories are ""absolutely ludicrous"". This is a perfect example of trying to ""neutralize"" the source rather than being neutral.  The current text neutrally presents the actual source material in an accurate manner. Your version does not.  "