The first example is not a fallacy because no wrong conclusions have been drawn, and it is even questionably if it is an argumentum ad baculum since, ehm, no arguments have been made, just simple statements.
The same goes for the second example. It seems that all the presented, supposed instances of argumentum ad baculum as being a logical fallacy are not valid because no one actually draws any (wrong) conclusions, and only if this would happen one could speak of fallacy. 62.226.12.183