"
But mostly I'm also curious about how  would suggest presenting the reviews in the second paragraph of the lead, and how other people would respond to that. Can we get some concrete proposal?   
 Thanks for your input Merzul.  I agree that 30:3 ratio of negative:positive doe not merit a quotation.  But one reference seems reasonable.  How about this proposal? (the HTML comment is not mine - it is copied from the article)
The general media response to the film has been largely unfavorable, receiving a 9% (""Rotten"") meta-score from Rotten Tomatoes.  Multiple reviews, including those of USA Today and Scientific American, have described the film as propaganda.""This is propaganda, a political rant disguised as a serious commentary on stifled freedom of inquiry.""  The Chicago Tribune's conclusion was ""Rating: 1 star (poor)"", while the New York Times described it as ""a conspiracy-theory rant masquerading as investigative inquiry."" Positive reviews have come from media outlets such as National Review  and American Spectator.  "