"

Hi , the new section title sounds good to me, but I'm still in favor of removing the Charles Taylor quote.  It makes Mr. Taylor appear like a living legend, which perhaps he is, but it's odd that he's not referred to in such glowing terms on his own Wikipedia article (or maybe not: it's a very contentious statement from a periodical, not a person).  The second part of the quote seems like empty praise to me, not really encyclopedia grade material.  Neither part passes the sniff test, so I removed it again.

Also, from your comment, it appears that you think the article is unbalanced because positive material is not being included.  Is that what you think, that there is not enough positive material about Mr. Wilber in the article?  I thought the whole goal was NPOV, neither positive nor negative, just the facts. It's not supposed to sound like an ad, nor like an attack piece, and to that end, both this quote and negative quotes like ""Mr. Wilber is full of himself"" will get stricken.  

"