Hello Ten.. I read the information on the reference desk talk page, and in fact was already aware of Point-set-topologists post on the maths desk, and the minor fall out resulting from it. I tried for sometime to give a sensible reply (being a little bemused myself when I first read the post), but failed... In the end the comment I posted (which was aimed primarily at 'PST') seemed to totally summarise the situation. ie that somebody might benefit in pulling their head out of their ass. A ridiculous response to a ridiculous situation. It was meant as a joke, albeit insulting.
In the same spirit of humour I'd like to quote PST out of contextPerhaps I should have framed my remark in a less confrontational manner, but at its present length, it will at least leave an indelible mark on the OP's mind, which, I hope, will help him/her to realize the meaning of my comment later on.
I intended no harm towards any of the people involved. Also noting from your talk page - I see DeclanDavis is suspicious of me now. I can assure you and them that I did not post the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/82.44.54.133 contributions, nor do I understand them. I think PST went a little over the top on his/her post, and so did I.83.100.251.196