"

It was published by someone ""reliable"", note the copyright messages involving the radio shows and TV shows on which she appeared.  We are dealing with a person in broadcast media.  She made her own news, and broadcast it live (and tape-delayed).  I use her as my source.  As far as your ""redaction"", I'm going to take issue with that, can't you righties handle an unbiased assessment based on law?  Read USA Patriot.  The woman is a Terrorist, and she is her own source on the statements she made to millions of people, many of which have already acted in various ways on her incitement.  Also, I suggest you look at both the law and case law concerning libel cases, she claims it, she has to prove it.  I use her own words to make my case, meaning she has no case.  Of course, you want this to be a one-way discussion, with you controlling things, even what gets seen in the discussion, and I honestly take exception on your ""redaction"".  I'm at the point where I think you are one of this Terrorist's supporters?  Do you support Terrorist attacks on Liberal Americans?  She does, and has said so in front of millions of witnesses.  You defend her here, and that makes me wonder about YOU.  Her station, and the networks, both television and radio, on which she has made such statements are reliable sources, IMHO, you are full of....concerning the sourcing.  When the person in question says it on a copyrighted program in front of millions of witnesses, it is rediculous to ask for further sourcing, especially from a news media that takes Terrorist threats from the radical right as SOP and doesn't bother to report on them.\u2014Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.19.246   

Oh, and yes, this is an ""encyclopedia"", and as such, if the person makes Terrorist threats in front of millions of witnesses, then I think that fact should be in the encylopedia entry on that person.  Why do you righties always think you can get away with Terrorism, and go unpunished, and not be identified as a Terrorist?  If there is a place to do this, it is here.  The woman does it in front of millions of witnesses.  This is a matter of record, and if this ""encyclopedia"" is to be construed as a ""record"", it needs to have the full story."