If you believe something to be a personal attack, by all means bring it to my attention. If I agree then I will be happy to remove it. If you get it reviewed by an authoritative source then I'm happy to abide by their judgement. But when you present your personal opinion without any sound basis then I am not persuaded, and we will have to agree to differ. If you persist to push your own personal POV after you've made your case and failed to persuade then that amounts to trolling. If you wish to apply for a block, that is a matter for you. In effect what you are asking is for an expert to review the matter and give their view. They will see your conduct on the I...Butter talk page and see that it led to my allegation of trolling. That's why its important the allegation is set out there. Its not intended as a personal attack, its simply a logical consequence of your conduct. For my part I feel we are at the informal stage, where you are skirting at the borderline of outright misconduct. I've set out the allegation of what I think you are doing wrong, and you've had the opportunity to reply. You haven't disputed the allegation and I've warned you to stop doing it. You responded by attempting to delete the allegation and failing that applying to have my account blocked. Perhaps to you this makes sense. To my mind you take care and due consideration in moving from the informal dispute resolution stage to making a complaint more formally. However, having done this, I would now ask you to leave this matter alone until the matter is adjudicated. Please don't edit or otherwise change the I..Butter article or talk page until that time.