"

 Unblock request 
  In reply to the dishonest block decline, my edit was: ""What utter tosh. None of my edits are ""aggressive"". I knew this website was degenerated, I never realised just how far dishonesty has pervaded through the membership.""
 In reply to the gravedancing involved and as of yet unpunished Arctic Kangaroo, my edit was: ""This user has continued to prove my estimation about them totally correct, on their talkpage, they are acting as if they did not know this was gravedancing, so I will follow through on my promise to create an account from this IP when the block expires tomorrow, and I will have them dealt with for their obvious trolling, distruption and bad faith.""
  This was my first unblock request, the text of which can be seen above. 
  This was a message I left to  after he had closed it, by mistake. My edit was: ""I didn't realise you had already closed the discussion before adding my last message, I should have been more careful and checked first. Kind regards""
  This was the comment I made to Arctic Kangaroo. This is the only edit which matches the accusations laid against me by JamesBWatson when he unfairly declined my block request, the comment was as follows: ""Users like you are the reason why I decided to leave here about 5 years ago. I cannot believe how utterly rude and disingenous you have been. You only took that user to wp:ani because they refused your help. Then you allowed their messages to be deleted which quite clearly show they are willing to undergo teaching, but because it wasn't from you, you didn't like that did you? Without a doubt the removal of barnstars and reaction to the welcome message was beyond the pale, and should have been dealt with by a short admin block, but your dishonesty surrounding this matter is utterly repulsive. I am very, very tempted to create an account just to have you dealt with for your actions"". I fail to see how this was any worse than what gets said and ignored by many other editors, but I apologised for it and made clear that I understood why I was blocked, which guidelines I broke and that I accepted my mistake. 
  This was the last comment on the ani debate, and the one for which I apologised to Thumperward because it was posted after he closed the debate. The full post read: ""What should you have done? Try leaving them alone like they asked, that's usually a good start, then try not allowing messages that could have vindicated them to be deleted from your talk page. He/she did not want your help. At that juncture, you COULD have advised him about how to contact uninvolved editors, but instead you chose to take it personally and spite him by taking him here. As for ""rudely"", would that be like launching an edit war on his/her own talk page?""
  This was a comment in the debate. It reads: ""I'm not commenting ""on behalf"" of anyone, I'm just trying to come to terms with why this situation devolved so rapidly. I wasn't aware that IP's were forbidden from contributing here? Or are you trying to suggest some sort of ulterior motive? My comment about Wikipedia review was meant to state that he/she probably had some sort of idea about how attitudes work here, which has been proven absolutely right, sadly. I like the way the original point of my last message was ignored. Or don't you see it as strange that a user who refused help from an editor has now been dragged here for being distruptive by the very same editor he/she clearly had an issue with? And don't you find it even slightly off that the very message asking for help was deleted by an involved outside user? Or are you more interested in playing semantics? As for the reaction to the welcome message, it was wrong and probably should have bee dealt with, but not like this""
  This is another comment on the debate, which reads: ""Ah, so that is what it is? Because he knew about wikipedia review? That explains why you took the unilateral actions of deleting both his user pag