"== discretino ==

Concede the no of ills and oil depletions wont mind —Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs)

 File:WLAatVandA.svg 

Hi, I deleted File:WLAatVandA.svg and File talk:WLA@V&A.svg; on Commons because the two files were blank. Your svg code was linking to images on your computer and so they could not be displayed. If you want to make an SVG, you should trace the images rather than include them directly. talk 
Thanks for clearing this up - I got them uploaded eventually but it didn't work originally. (Talk) 

 Thanks 

Thanks for your help. I double post because I didn't know if you would check my talk page on Swedish Wikipedia.//  
Indeed - thank you! (Talk) 

 About archiving 

My apologies for reverting you on that, but please see User talk:Ben MacDui#Archive, where we already went back and forth on the same thing.   
So you did - apologies I didn't see it. I only partially archived it and there seems to be a clear consensus developing - if you pardon the circularity! - in favour of consensus/70% but definitely not 30% or majority. Given the number of ""partial support"" comments I think we actually need a new proposal - care to help me draft one? (Talk) 
To tell you the truth, I really have no expectation that the snowy ones are going to go any differently than they already have. I just want to get as many editors as possible weighing in on this particular point, and I think the most unbiased results will come from seeing all the options together. My advice would be to improve what we've got, not to start over from scratch. But I'll definitely lobby hard that we really fix up the one we've got, not just plug in poll results mindlessly, and I'm pretty confident we'll have agreement to do that.  

 Notification: Proposed 'Motion to Close' at Wikipedia:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC 

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC
re: a 'Motion to close', which would dissolve Cda as a proposal. The motion includes an !vote.  You have previously commented at this page.   

 You do not understand the copyright situation at en.WS 

I checked my email after the holiday to find two ""GoogleAlerts"" mentioning Wikisource.  In them you are quoted by promoting the addition of materials that have unacceptable copyright status to the English Wikisource.  You should have these quotes corrected if at all possible.  The US does not recognize the rule of the shorter term and as Wikisource servers are in the US the copyright status of these items in the UK is more or less irrelevant.  The items that you were promoting as recent UK copyright expirations can instead be added toWikilivres whose server is in Canada, a coutry that recognizes the rule of the shorter term.  In the future, please do a little more legwork directly with the project you hope to promote before you start talking to the press.SB 
Thanks for commenting on this BirgitteSB - we recognise the complexity of international copyright law and would welcome working with you on this in the future if you can. Please let me know about the press coverage you have seen. The press release we sent out was mostly drafted by Charles Matthews, who is a regular contributor and admin on Wikisource. I am a regular contributor on Wikipedia and Commons, so I am aware of international copyright law but it was mostly Charles' work. Our press release is available at and may be more useful than referring to the published story. We do refer to things becoming public domain in the UK, which is where that particular comment arose, and it was a press release relating to the UK. In retrospect we