"

""LightAnkh,"" please be mindful of the hypocrisy of your comment - myself and others have made it abundantly clear that this article needs serious revisions, and our insight has been met only with invective and personal accusations.  You made no noise over the absurd accusation that I am a clone of somebody else, and seem to be working simply to try to discredit anyone who wants to clean up this article rather than actually pursue everyone's mutual goal of a high-quality article.

""The Prophet Yhwh,"" a homeless person with mental delusions who claimed he could summon UFOs with his mind, is not a good source. Using the poll presented in a ""Ufology"" magazine as an accurate sample of what every American believes about UFOs is flagrantly dishonest. Never mind the hundreds of corrections that I have prepared and partially demonstrated. Now, please, answer the question posed to all UFO dogmatists who want to leave this page untouchable: given what you have seen above, what makes you think this article is in good shape?"