"
 Too bad, I really, really, AM a Phi Beta Kappa, 4.0 [called Group I in our School] from an Ivy League College (I didn't say Harvard, so how did you know? I guess the quality shows); and you didn't speak with ""sarcasm,"" but with venom, derision, and contempt.  Moreover, Dr. K didn't say that what I wrote, while working in response to his successive queries, was ""gibberish""  YOU did, mister, possessed of all your full-blown haugthiness.  I told you once before that you must have been getting away all your life with demeaning people in a condescending and vituperative way, BUT THAT THIS STOPS WITH ME... Tough, huh?  I guess you just can't cope with being told off about your cross tongue and bitter attitude. Neither Dr. K, as he as written at length, nor I has any intention of working under your hegemony. That's NOT the Wikipedia way, as he said.  And what I wrote above were carefully documented facts (regarding, inter alia, what Dr. K did, or didn't do, in response to YOU doing YOUR ""own thing""  putting everyone else down) based on the written record, much to your consternation, I see. Since you don't appear to have a decent bone in your body, and lept to attack my work product as produced in the form generated by dialogue over time with Dr. K, I suppose I shouldn't expect you to be able to discern that that work product was not written in telegraph style for final print  sure sign of an embittered, frustrated little mind, and petty tyrant of an editor all too eager to prove his indispensibility.  No one works with a nasty editor, regardless of substance, anyway. (Also, as to substance, I don't believe that Will Durant's insights, e.g., that Xenophon ""unwittingly"" prepared the way for Alexander, nor those of the various other sources, are reducible to a single sentence, as you appear to propose, although I realize that you are no respector of true scholarship, especially when you didn't research it.) BTW, you didn't answer my question, what was YOUR academic standing, and in what school? 108.14.212.113 "