"

Welcome!

Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!    

 Price of oil 

Bogorm, you really need to discuss your changes on the talk page.  You are making some fundamental editing errors which would need to be cleaned up sooner or later, and the fact that you keep reverting to your version is getting disruptive.  Also, please try to find sources other than Presstv.ir, as they have a conflict of interest in this subject and thus may not be the most trustworthy of sources.  If other sources are saying the same thing it is much more persuasive to the readers of this article.    
 I am not interested in American stance towards the PressTV and I urge you not to remove the source. If your obstinacy towards removing ""numerous"" and ""augmented"" is inexorable, I should ""die Flinte ins Korn werfen"", as the Germans say, and laissez-faire... . But I assure you I am habitually not so amenable as in this matter. Besides, it's the above mentioned POV towards PressTV that I find disruptive. But methinks Wikipedia is more than copying from sources and if the Iranian which wrote the artcle, preferred to express himself about augmenting in Simple English, that does not interdict us from rendering his words in a more elaborate manner, does it??? And this is not the Wikipedia in Simple English, is it? Ah, one more thing - as most speculators are not Iranians, methinks it's beyond the ""La Manche"" that most conflicts of interest are engendered...   

Have you at any time used any other user name
Your style of editing is not that of someone who has just started editing Wikipedia. Have you at any time used any other user name?   
 No, I have not. But I acquired experience while editing in the Bulgarian Wikipedia and Bogorm is since approximately one month the global name for all other language-editions of Wikipedia, where I am active, it is not only the bg Wikipedia.   

Then I suggest that you read Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision (Balkans warring).   
 Why am I referred to it? Have I edited any article on the English Wikipedia related to Macedonia? Because in the immediate past I am not able to recollect such edit of mine...   

Because it refers to Balkans article in general see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Area of conflict.   

Three-revert rule
As you are new to the English Wikipeida and are actively repeatedly editing Radovan Karadzic related pages you also need to read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule so that you are familiar with its restrictions and do not breach them.   
 If you mean Arrest of Radovan Karadžić‎, that is why I engaged in the discussion page in an effort to find a suitable place for Delić' statement. And my last edit by which I tagged unsourced material is not to be considered rev