"
.
No, the facts are pretty clear. You changed it away from the DSM IV in the DSM IV criteria section while claiming you know the DSM IV.
Well, the main point remains that you think that how the world at large uses it is superseded by the medical operalization, which is bogus. And really, you can cherry pick a source but the law version ios not really what the general public uses. So, lets take the general merrrian websters def: ""a young person especially between infancy and youth"". But heck, I am not maki9ng those claims about ownership for nothing.
Well, my point is that with anorexia nervosa, the general use and the medical definition are rather close, and the article does not start with the DSM IV diagnostic criteria:
A. Refusal to maintain body weight at or                                      above a minimally normal weight for age and                                      height (e.g., weight loss leading to                                      maintenance of body weight less than 85% of                                      that expected; or failure to make expected                                      weight gain during period of growth, leading                                      to body weight less than 85% of that                                      expected).

B. Intense fear of gaining weight or                                      becoming fat, even though underweight

C. Disturbance in the way in which one's                                      body weight or shape is experienced, undue                                      influence of body shape on self-evaluation,                                      or denial of the seriousness of the current                                      low body weight. 
D. In postmenarcheal females, amenorrhea,                                      i.e., the absence of at least three                                      consecutive menstrual cycles. 

Does not look like those criteria are in the second line of the article. So, lets stop the pretense that the article is even close to this out of balance article.
Yes, I just have to go through all the edits and make a tally.
.
  at venus "