"

Reply to Mr. Burdak
I am glad to see you have at least referenced that quote now - it was not at all clear before where it came from. As it does not agree with standard translations of that passage, one wonders about the unusual wording - so reminiscent of the odd ""quote"" you made from the Mahabharata the other day. 

But, more importantly, what about the completely false ""reference"" to ""The History of Civilizations of Central Asia, Vol. II""? Why have you (again) not replied to my pointing out of this apparent dishonesty? This is only the most recent in a very long list of false ""quotes"" and ""references"" you have made and I have exposed on these pages - as you well know. Now, I am willing to accept that maybe one or two false quotes could be the result of honest mistakes or sloppy research - but when the process is repeated over and over and over again one begins to suspect that the author is doing it deliberately and intends to deceive readers. So, quite naturally, I and others have come to mistrust any quotes you may give - especially to sources that are difficult to check. I am sorry - but you have brought this situation upon yourself.   "