"== Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Dewayne Williams ==

Can you undo this and give it a few more days? —   
Sure.  If you think there's a possibility you can prove notability, I'm all for it.  I have no objection to you restoring it yourself, or I'm happy to restore it myself and so note the AfD.  Let me know which way you want to go with it.  - Philippe 

 Bosniaks 
Please google haplogroup I1b, and see if it reflects Bosniaks texts related to genetics, such as highlights that Bosniaks are firstly of Slavic genetic heritage. Because the consesus is clearly dominated by one or more Serb editors with multiple nicknames. And you keep banning all Bosniak interests and everybody who this Serbian based vandal group dismiss. My advice, just read for a while about haplogroup I1b and you will see that Everybody says it is isolated in Bosniak based populous and drops amazingly when outside of their regions. Find some maps from gov based sources that do not generalise to nations, instead look at maps that offer higher resolutions and zooms. 77.78.198.147  

I think you mistake me for someone with a stake in the content of that article.  I have no - zero - none - interest in getting involved in that content dispute.  My sole motivation in protection the page was to prevent the back and forth blind reversions that were going on and force the parties to the article's talk page to discuss it.  So, rather than bringing this information to me here, take it to the article's talk page.  I will not take a stand on content for that page.  - Philippe 
 It is rather useless to take it to talk pages, as I said the consensus is bullied away from reflecting sources, instead they are ""exterminate Bosniaks and their heritage"" POW because ""we know Admins will be too blind to notice"" 77.78.198.147  
 Well, we're certainly not going to allow it on the article if it's not in consensus.  May I suggest dispute resolution?  - Philippe 
 Yah ok, thanks, done. 77.78.198.147  
Wikipedia:Responsible Editing Pledge
Would you give your consideration to signing this pledge from doc Glasgow. Thanks,  
Thank you for calling it to my attention.  Since this is my only account and it's easily linkable to my real name, I have no problem signing the pledge, though I would not support it as a mandatory rule for anyone other than myself.  Interesting concept, and I appreciate that you brought it to me.  It's something to think about, clearly.  - Philippe 

 Question 

I'm working on an article about the Old Stone House in one of my sandboxes. I stopped by the house a few days ago and picked up a brochure for research. Some of the info is not accessible online (or else I'm just not finding it) and I'm wondering how I reference a brochure. It was made by the National Park Service, so it's definitely a RS. Also, I laughed when I read your comment and I responded. Thanks.  yada yada 
 You said you'd never tell!    I think for citation purposes, I'd treat a brochure as a book (although, obviously) without the ISBN number.  Details are at Wikipedia:CITE#FULL.  To be sure, though, you might ask over at the WP:REFDESK, because I've never done that before.  - Philippe 
Ok, thanks. I use the HD alot, but the one time I used the RD I didn't get an answer. I'll try there again. [[User:AgnosticPreachersKid|APK