When you look at it in the clear light of day, this is an argument in which both sides are doing the same things, and making the same (counter-)accusations. It has been 'resolved,' to date, by the fact that one side of the argument have the power. But might doesn't make right. Who actually started the unreasonable behaviour? Perhaps the Wikipedian who seemed to make the rather ambiguous statement in which he said that the (Holocaust) Talk page is not there for discussion. Well it is there for discussion - that's what a Talk page is. If he meant it is not there for irrelevant discussion he should have stated that explicitly, and, that having been done, be prepared to demonstrate that to anyone who might be in doubt on the matter.80.229.223.248