Suggestion 

Hello - I noticed your edits to EMF-related articles, which were brought up on the adminstrators' noticeboard. I don't disagree with the core of your assertions, nor with the need to present prevailing scientific opinion as such and minority views as minority views. However, your approach is raising some hackles. I'd suggest discussing your concerns further on the article talk pages and trying to reach some sort of consensus about how to better present the mainstream view of EMF-related health issues. Tirades, however justified they may feel, are counterproductive in the long run. Although it often doesn't feel like it, reasonableness will eventually win out here if you're able to cool off and explain your position calmly. Making rapid-fire edits to the pages in question while a controversy is unsettled on the talk page is not a good idea. If you're deeply concerned about the current version, you can tag it with {{POV}} or {{TotallyDisputed}} until the issue is resolved on the talk page - this is not ideal, but preferable to an edit war. '''''' Talk