"

 Not sure why we beat around the bush in not just saying she was crushed by a bulldozer 

All three of the first three sources cited about the cause of her death (the film Occupation 101, The Guardian, and Time) state that she was killed by a bulldozer, whether you want to call it an accident or not. Trying to reference which aspect of being bulldozed, such as ""debris"" falling from the bulldozer, as the IDF reworded it, is a way of psychologically distancing the person operating the bulldozer for the IDF from having any direct responsibility for the action. None of the three sources state it was caused by ""debris."" So the source citations should be moved closer to the statement that the witnesses said she was caught ""underneath."" Currently the three citations have been placed next to a phrase that none of them reference. Therefore the sentence should be broken into two parts. The part about the IDF referencing ""debris"" should have whatever citation mentions it next to that sentence, but none of the three sources cited references debris at all. 

Here is what they do say:

1. http://occupiedpalestine.wordpress.com/2010/12/26/occupation-101-full-movie-in-11-parts/  Part 6 of 7 after about 7:41, the film Occupation 101 (2006) states ""she got caught underneath the bulldozer""; ""When Rachel Corrie was killed, she was protecting a doctor's home""; ""The U.S. Congress has refused her parents' request for an independent investigation in her murder.""  This source said nothing about debris accidentally falling on her. 

2. ""Corrie, 23, was crushed to death by an army bulldozer in Rafah, Gaza, as she protested against house demolitions."" -The Guardian. This newspaper simply states she was ""crushed to death by the bulldozer.""

3. ""Rachel Corrie was a 23-year-old American from Olympia, Wash., who was crushed to death by an Israeli Army bulldozer March 16, 2003. Corrie was in the Gaza Strip, working with the International Solidarity Movement, which opposes Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and living among Palestinians whose homes were being demolished. She was kneeling in front of a home, acting as a human shield, when she was bulldozed."" - Time.     
Again, here we are told she was ""crushed to death"" and ""bulldozed."" Nothing about debris accidentally falling.

I or someone else should put the citations next to a phrase about the bulldozer killing her. How exactly it killed her (whether dropping stuff on her or rolling over her) is speculative. None of the three sources reference debris. If the IDF ""debris"" statement must be included it should be a separate sentence. The IDF operated the machine and have a potential self protection conflict of interest in their wording.

I'd feel better if it said something like: 

""She was crushed by a bulldozer's operations clearing land in front of a Palestinian doctor's home.[1,2,3] An IDF investigation reported she died after being struck by falling debris.[source??]""

(More accurate for the IDF part of it would be ""by debris falling from the bulldozer."" I'd probably rather it say the IDF ""claimed"" rather than ""reported"" but I'm not going to change that part.)
-   "