Since the website contains user-level functions in the sense that users can be banned or promoted to have higher authority, it is clear that there has to be some scope for discussing user behaviour. I am genuinely concerned about the pattern of conduct I have seen from Gwen Gale, which I consider to be abusive and inappropriate for someone wielding administrative powers. A simple Google search on her name shows that those concerns are widely shared. Please inform me about how these concerns can best be raised. According to the policy documents I have read, an RFC can be created about a user if two people share the same concern. How can the opinion of others be solicited, however, if the matter is not allowed to be discussed because it is considered an ad hominem attack?90.213.182.228