"]] 

Again, thanks.  There shouldn't be anything too unhandleable (if that's a word) until it actually gets released.  

I disagree with this decision, but wheel warring won't help anything...  

I personally think that it should be fully protected till everyone gets a chance to buy the book, which would be 24 hours after the initial British release, but that's just me.  

 Interesting article from Will Collier on DeepDiscount, eBay and early shippin' books. 

This article was brought to my attention this morning.  Not sure how/if it needs to be incorperated into the article, but it is an interesting read.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OTYxYmE5Y2UzNDMyNWQ2YzFmYTk3NzY1MTkxZGFhNzI=

 
Thanks, I added the info.  

 Traces to the person who leaked the photos of Deathly Hallows 

It seems, that the pictures leaked on the internet help the investigators, because metadata saved in the pictures reveal more information. Also other aspects can help to identify the person.
See this article: http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article2104250.ece ( )
This could be getting to the point where there should be a separate article entirely that traces the story of this particular Harry Potter leak, considering it has led to sustained press coverage and lawsuits.  As this seems to be the only full leak of the entire book, negating the need for disambig, perhaps it should simply be entitled Leak of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.  
Try not to get ensnared in recentism. While there is still a ton of documentation, there isn't an enormous amount of unique information. We should wait a bit, see if it can't be condensed, and then consider a split.- 
Yeah, I agree with that.  Only if it gets to the point where further legal action is taken or if this person's identity is discovered.  

If there is enough information, this would be an interesting article, but it should report the story of the leak from the beginning to the ending - if there will be one ;) - and background information. It would also shorten the hole article Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. In Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows there should be a section where a few sentences describe what happened and then above ""Main Article: Leak of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows"". But I agree with Wafulz, that we should wait.  

 Dealing with inevitable spoilers 

We need a hideable section template.  That way people can post the plot details, but have them hidden by default so people don't have to read them if they don't want to.  (Talk  Contrib) 

Trust me, you don't want to get involved in this type of spoiler discussion. It has resulted in months of arguments on Wikipedia:Spoiler, several Requests for comment, and a requested arbitration case.- 

I think, plot details shouldn't be revealed before the book is officialy released. Wikipedia shouldn't spread illegaly gotten information.  

Considering that some people have quite legally obtained the book before its ""official"" release, not all the ""spoilers"" are ""illegally gotten infomation"".  Perhaps you should put a bit more thought into your comments before you make a blanket statment implying that a large amount of your fellow Wiki editors are criminals.   

No one is advocating that.  T/C 

This might be an idea you could pursue as a broader guideline if you really felt strongly about it but I don't think it should be used in this setting because all of the other Harry Potter book articles simply have a first section titled ""Plot overview"".  By the way, wouldn't it be assumed that a com