"

Guilt by innuendo?

Let us say that I establish an organization (you can figure out why) whose sole purpose is to register and treat victims of physical abuse by you, as reported by your neighbors and family. And then (strangely enough) report that, indeed, 90% of the victims/reports, are (guess what!) by you! Golly! QED!

None of this, however, would be proof, by a constitutionally mandated impartial judicial authority that you were indeed guilty of anything except a victim of a blatant smear by me!

The Austalia ""organisation"" kind of falls into that category. It is not, in itself, scholarly in any way, and doesn't belong here,  nor do it's comments.

We won't even get into the Burden of Proof (logical fallacy, where, since it is impossible for anyone to prove themselves innocent here (no accusations being levied), they must therefore be guilty of something.

Begging the question fallacy. There are probably several others.   "