"

 Restricted biotech a characeristic of nanopunk?! 

The 2nd sentence in the article reads the following:
""The genre is similar to biopunk, but describes the world where the use of biotechnologies are limited or prohibited, so only nanites and nanotechnologies are widely use (while in biopunk, bio- and nanotechnologies often coexist)""
I'm really doubting the truth content of it. Basically I don't think that it's a characteristic of nanopunk that biotech is limited or prohibited even if some novels feature that. Additionally I'd rather say that this is a characteristic of biopunk with which a contrast is seeked here. Also ""so only nanites and nanotechnologies are widely in use"" is a non sequitur - it's not a logical conclusion that ""only nanites"" and nanotechnologies are widely in use because biotech is limited. Furthermore what's the ""only"" referring to? Only in which area of life - medical? social? every?! Also I don't think it's not impossible for biotech to coexist in nanotech even though it probably (and eventually that might be a core characteristic) plays a subordinate role.
So I basically think everything about that sentence is false. I might be wrong about it (parts of it). So please post whatever you think of that here.
If there are no objections I'm gonna delete that sentence and somehow get the ""in nanopunk biotech plays a subordinate role to nanotechnology""-part in there (which isn't really what the quoted sentence conveys).   "