, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

That Op-ed is 90% about criticism of the US system and I'm not sure that is relevant to this article.  Did you see where he says there's a pretty good argument that she should have been found innocent?  Fair enough. Wikipedia articles are supposed to report facts about opinions. Is his opinion notable? That's a close call. I'm calling for quite a bit of discussion about what observers say about the trial.  He's saying he doesn't like the US response, not that he agrees with the verdict.  The lengthy criticism section I put together wasn't necessarily intended to go in as is.  The idea is that it puts in one place content that I believe belongs in various places in the article.  Feel free to say what you think is wrong with what I wrote in that criticism section.  13:25