"
====
Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at . Thank you.   

 Spanish heraldry 

As a respected contributor to the above article, you're probably best placed to deal with the issues with it. If you want to take it on, I believe there is a lack of: inline citations in particular; good English; and specificity - parts of the article explain heraldry in general, and are not sufficiently (IMHO) to be included in the article (eg. most of the Definitions section). Thanks, -  (t, c) 

 BCN-SIA discussion 

First, sorry because my poor english.

Hi, i don't want to start a undo-war or something like that, but the avionews post is only a rumour. It's a propaganda speech from a Milan SEA not a declaration of any SIA officer.

I've talked with the SIA spanish comercial manager and he says me that the italian SIA officers inmediatly deny that issue, nor the SIA-BCN cancellation, nor the FCO-MXP flights traspassing... and all is a simply propaganda from Milan in this moments of crisis. This was also confirmed by SIA London regional headquarters...

Unfortunately, I haven't found any italy/UK SIA press relase dennying the Milan SEA president affirmations but i think that informations that I have are enough to question the avionews article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs)  

Because of that, I have ""twicked"" the comment from ""until summer 2009"" to ""probably until summer 2009, in which they could codeshare with other Star Alliance partners""
In the article, the text refered (Today the SiA flights carry out the Singapore-Malpensa-Barcelona route but in short time the flight will be reduced to Singapore-Malpensa route, while the continuation to Barcelona will be assured by Lufthansa Italia), is not referenced as Bonomi's words but as an explanation by Avionews.
The comments is not anymore an affirmation but a puntuation between brackets. Sincerely, I fail to see your urge to remove it. Cheers. MauritiusXXVII (Aut Disce, Aut Doce, Aut Discede!). 

I don't have a urge to remove it. I don't remove it. I only explain it to you the situation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.58.34.97   

 Re Anon user 89.130.28.68 behaviour 

Today when I woke up, I found a whole lot of personal attacks from user 89.130.28.68 against me.

Messages such as:
""THIS USER IS SUCH A STUPID AND BIASED WIKIPEDIA EDITOR. SHOULD BE BANNED FOREVER!"" on my user page.
A blanking of my talk-page whith the following message ""buaagh i'm sick only reading this user please..remove him from wiki!!!!"".
""that is fucking stupid and haves no sense!!!! That is a person with various nationalities NOT A NATIONALITY OF SPAIN . ONLY MAURICE27 CAN SAY THAT!"" in theNationalities of Spain article.
""WTF!!! IS NOT POSSIBLE THAT MAURICE27 IS STILL EDITING THIS ARTICLE FROM A SUCH BIASED AND STUPID POV!!!!!!"" in the Catalonia article. (NOTICE that I hadn't edit that article since January 17, 2009

I ask you if you ca