"News and notes]] - I understand that concern, but I thought the revised wording would avoid that impression? Regards,   

 Concern over reportage of the ""Pending changes"" trial 

Hi HaeB, the post linked to in the News section of the draft of the next Signpost seems to be less certain of the 14 June start than the Signpost report is. 

I had a look at the Help page linked to as well, which is going to get a lot of traffic after publication. It is very confusing, a matter I've taken up on the Help talk page.

It's very concerning.  (talk) 
Hi Tony, I am glad someone is doing fact-checking ;) Seeing your subsequent edits on the story , it seems that your concerns about the date have already been resolved. I think that  June 14 was spelled out quite clearly in the linked announcement, and from the current discussion at the RfC it seems that at least at the moment, they are intending to stick to it.
Note that I had only provided the link and the headline for the story, as a placeholder, it was phoebe who actually wrote it. In [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-06-07/"