"

 You can improve Wikipedia 

You have used your administrative privilege to squelch my assessment of the article and by extension, Wikipedia in general.  I suspect that you have some psychological issues and will probably delete this complaint of your heavy-handedness.  Many Wikipedians consider your (as a prime example) bullying approach (without adequate dialogue) to dissatisfaction with Wikipedia's quality to be enough cause to leave you in your self-assured myth of greatness.  There may be no safe place to criticize Wikipedia's flaws within the framework of Wikipedia, if you have your way all the time, so they will leave and moan about everything you doI suspect you enjoy this and will change with nobody, so long as you get your way wiothout direct competition for prominence on the INTERNET.  It's a major reason why many have invested in making new ""pedias"".  It's okay...nobody expects you to live up to the model of sysophood established back in the day.  Who really cares?  Why am I wasting my time with you, or having any concern for the state of Wikipedia these days?  It's hopeless and thank you for confirming what everybody outside the Wikiverse knowsenough to stay far away from a failed utopian project.  Thanks again.  Depending on your response in the form of commentary or ""action"", it may offer additional credibility to the claims of the multitude who will not venture to Wikipedia for any reason.  Feel free to cybersquat and claim this ""mountain"" yours to do with as you please and to hell with anybody else's thoughts.    "