WP:VG assessment
Well, this is definitely Start-class. The usual problems which Stub/Start articles have (fair use rationales, reference formatting etc) aren't there, which is great! Nevertheless, there's still some way to go to get this to B-class, but this can easily be attributed to the fact that the game's only been out for a week. Here are some ideas to improve the article:
You have some good screenshots, but one showing the actual gameplay (interface et al) would be useful.
The gameplay will be largely the same as EQ2, but it's still a good idea to include a brief overview and a link to EverQuest II#Gameplay. Information on new features could also be merged to this section.
Try converting the list of zones to paragraphed text, which is nicer to read.
To make the article easier to navigate, you might want to rename the History of Kunark section to Story and include any other plot details.
Lead needs expansion per WP:LS: summarise the entire article in three or four paragraphs.
Any information on the development of the expansion? When was it announced? Was it on show at any big game shows? Were there any slippages in release dates?
When enough reviews of the game have been released, create a Critical Reception section.
For ideas on the last two points, have a look at some articles at WP:VG#Featured content. Don't hesitate to ask if you have any further questions. Hope this helps, Talk