The other editor is refusing mt contribution claiming I am not reliable holding me to a different standard than other sources which are actually inferior to mine. Mine is a site devoted to the subject of offbeat openings, Krabbes is a blog. The discretion is not objective. I got mad and I cannot retract personal attacks because it is honest and this guy must know. It has nothing to do with wikipedia. I dont really care about wikipedia. This guy has made it personal by warring over my source as if it is unreliable even though it is and even though the UON citation which I used to host on my page has almost identical content. I would like to add. Wikipedia is not a consortium of experts, it is a reflection of the masses who are the common denomiator. This is not a place to go, if you want to hear from an expert. That was the attack made and it is true. This guy decided im not RS even though I tried for a resolution. He refused to resolve and insisted on his POV. The page has not changed at all thus reflecting a microcosm of the actual masses who are not as smart as the experts. So until the lowest common denominator catches up, niche fields will be neglected. 166.137.88.42