this is not an edit war! 

hi Sam56mas
just letting you know- we've gone backwards and forwards a couple of times lately on the 'supportads' reference link. It looks to me like you've (part) removed it because it was a broken link after an earlier edit, and i've restored it for the same reason. I'm inclined to leave it in place, because it is a relevant link, and because the only other link regarding that topic is provided by sydney star observer, which i've noticed some people have an issue with. I'll reinsert it in a few days if you don't object- maybe i'm missing something in my assumptions. if you don't want it there- for any reason- i'm happy to leave it out. 
would you prefer it gone for some reason? if so, no problem, i'll leave it.
given the histoy of the page, i'm avoiding anything that makes it look like we're edit warring when we're not.