"

 Undue weight on one controversy - proposed solution 

This article has a ""Controversies"" section with several detailed sentences about the Miller-Young incident in 2014. WP:CSECTION says ""sections within an article dedicated to negative criticisms are normally also discouraged. Topical or thematic sections are frequently superior to sections devoted to criticism"" and ""Sections or article titles should generally not include the word 'controversies'.""

This article shouldn't have a standalone ""Controversies"" section; controversies should be discussed in context in the ""History"" section if they're important to the history of the university. Looking at the current ""History"" section, it's very brief - for example, there are only two sentences about the May 2014 IV killings, which is very important in the history of UCSB, and it doesn't mention the 2001 IV killings, which are also important to its history. There is a longer article at History of the University of California, Santa Barbara with more room for detail. I propose that we should move discussion of the Miller-Young controversy to that history article and consider reducing it there. I can do that myself, but it's a somewhat sensitive subject so I'm putting it up for discussion first.    "