Chump 
Alright chump, I've grown bored of messing around with your inane contributions, but rest assured that I could keep this up for years if, unlike you, I didn't have better things to do.

I don't understand why you want to spend so much time out of your life pretending that you're some sort of Wikipedia patrol officer.  Seems to me that pretty much all you do is tag other people's pages for deletion.  Seems to me it must be predicated on some sort of megalomania.

This whole charade about an encyclopedia that 'anyone can edit' is given the lie by chumps like you.  All I wanted to do was write a page about an author I'm interested in, but your arrogant and ignorant deletion of the start of that has put me off bothering with it again.

I noticed that when you tagged it for deletion you removed the very clear indication at the top that it was a beginning and that it needed development.  This meant that the next person who came along had no idea that there was more to follow.  Why didn't you just tag it as a stub?  Because you're so wrapped up in your pathetic power trip that you just wanted to alienate me?

And who are you to decide who's 'notable' and who isn't?  I figure anyone with a dozen published works (which is easily verifiable) is notworthy by any definition of the term  except, clearly, the subjective definition you store somewhere in your tiny brain.

So congratulations, chump.  Enjoy policing this web site.  Where would the world be without heroes like you?