Interlude Page Review 

Hello, and thank you for taking the time to review Interlude's page. I just have some questions about why the page was rejected. You mention that I treat it as notable in it's own right, and that references are about Interlude and not on the campaigns per se. In terms of reference, I included sources such as Fast Company, TechCrunch, Yahoo News, and TIME... so I'm not sure I understand the comment. Additionally, the page follows the format of other entries I've seen, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droga5. It would be extremely helpful if you could provide more detail on how I could improve the entry and have my submission approved. Thanks!