"

Jane Percy, Duchess of Northumberland‎' bias accusation
It's one thing to disagree on content, another entirely for you to make an accusation of bias. If you have any moral compass whatsoever, you will now either substantiate your accusation or withdraw it and apologise. Ad hominem attacks are not acceptable.  (talk) 
It was not an attack. It was an observation. You've already distorted her words. For example, you inserted a claim that ""she dismisses criticism as uninformed and bitchy"", which is not what the source said. If my observation was wrong, I am sorry, but I'm not convinced that it was. I hope that you will prove otherwise.   
The leap you need to explain is how you get from your assertion of ""not what the source said"" to bias. The source said of one set of critics ""Gardeners are quite bitchy, aren't they"". Of another, ""There was only a handful of grand English lady designers, and the bitchiness I encountered was unbelievable"". These would seem to support an assertion that she dismissed critics as bitchy. How many times in one piece must we read such dismissals before we conclude that she dismisses critics as bitchy? And how, however you view my sentence construction, does it amount to bias? You have made the assertion. It is now down to you to explain yourself.  (talk) 

This isn't going away, Surtsicna. You no more get to walk away from this than you would if you'd accused a banker of fraud or a teacher of child abuse. Either explain how any of my actions amount to bias, withdraw the accusation, or accept that you are a deeply flawed individual lacking in the basic common courtesies. And - again as common courtesy - start using edit summaries. There really is no excuse for your behaviour.  (talk) "