"

Card rule
Excuse me. I read the talk page. You said and I quote ""If the style is listed on a card as its own style when the routine is drawn or when the routine is announced, I treat it as its own style. If the label is only used in passing, it goes in the subsections."" That's why I moved ""Pas de Deux"" to it's own row because Katee and Will in season four (U.S. version) and  Melissa and Ade in season five (U.S. version) did a pas de duex; it was on the card. Wake up. I was following your guidance. Why would you change it? Why would you react negatively to edits that are consistent with the rule you made up. Speaking of rules, I don't know where you got this sense of entitlement from because you do not WP:OWN the page. I went along with it for the sake of consistency but you clearly don't care about that because you reneged on your own rule when you undid my edit. 

Categorization
Don't patronize me and say that you appreciate the attention I'm giving to the page because if you did you wouldn't have reverted all my edits. The changes I made were not subjective. African dance is not jazz. How the show presents dance versus this page being a primer on dance is a non sequiter. African dance comes from AFRICA, not from jazz dance. How in the world is that subjective? This is obvious. You changing it back to being from jazz dance is actually what's subjective. Funk is STREET. Do some research. Electric Boogie is not a separate sub-style of Electric Boogaloo. It's more like a nickname for Electric Boogaloo, i.e. Michael/Mike, Jennifer/Jenny. So I don't understand why you would list this as a sub-style/variant of Electric Boogaloo. To be completely honest ""Electric Boogie"" is actually a song. People do the Electric Slide dance to the song ""Electric Boogie"". Think about the laymen who are reading this page. Because of your suborness, they're going to walk away thinking it's actually a separate dance style when it's not. Nothing that I've said above is subjective. It's based on facts. How can you to call my changes ill-advised and subjective while at the same time claiming the content you added was implemented ""in such way that WP:OR and needless debates on what divides styles does not occur."" Are you serious? The wikilinks I provided at the beginning of this paragraph has citations in those articles proving that what I'm saying is true. The dance styles table in this article has ZERO SOURCES. This is a classic example of WP:OR and a lack of WP:NPOV... and being subjective."