"

 Discussion of the Insane Guy's Is Not Worthy Enough To Devote the Entire First Paragraph To Him 

As outlined in my comments immediately above, Susan also argued with a man accusing Obama of being a fascist. Xeno attempted to devote the entire first paragraph to the little exchange she had with him - trying especially hard to make him, and hence the others, appear as dumb as possible. For instance, Xeno only included his statement ""because he is,"" when in actually the (concededly insane and dumb) man said ""because he is . . . all of the politicians need 1 term limits . . . the pirates are in Washington."" But I will adopt the wikipedia assumptions that everyone always says they comply with but really don't and go ahead and just assume Xeno acted in good faith. It must have just been a small mistake.
To the extent that her exchange with the first guy - and particularly, any ""clipping"" of his statements - would be relevant, I would argue (and I could find support) that it would be relevant to the extent of showing the disparity of treatment with which Susan has shown liberals depicting Republican presidents as Hitler and conservatives depicting Democrat presidents as liberals. I can't do it right this second, but in exactly 24 hours I will be able to devote all of my energies to ridding this article of its POV-pushing, laughable structure  "