"
So cite it, as they are the actual direct primary source. The so-called ""independent sources"" that have been cited in this article, like the SPLC, are neither ""reliable"" nor ""realistic"" 
and nor are they even ""accurate"". ""Image"" is subjective and POV, whereas, the actual facts 
are NPOV. Again, it is clear that you are not interested in factual accuracy in the article.
You can revert it and just make such Wikipedia articles not relevant nor accurate as usual 
as this is just becoming ever more common and well-known in the internet community, or just
as is the ""dinosaur"" mass media. 
Do a little independent research yourself and you will see that everything I had changed 
IS FACTUAL, whereas the article you reverted back to is NOT FACTUAL.
That is fine with me, as this only reflects Wikipedia's difficulty with ever having or in getting the facts straight and correct verses being just SPLC false propaganda. So be it!
============================================================================================="