Well no, actually I don't accept edits like those are acceptable and I assure you it won't happen again if you should reduce the block period to a more reasonable expiry. I was however very very angry when I made those moves because all I could see was two bullies never to have touched the Stevie May article continually reverting my edits using rollback and other slimy methods and never providing a summary other than vandalism being removed, yet nobody explained the vandalism to me. Meanwhile, when I did remove vandalism myself, those two restored the very same. I was mainly working from an old revision of the article and as you will appreciate, other editors inserted the info I was restoring and nobody at any time commented on what was wrong with it.