"

 ""Bottom line here, and this is likely not your fault"" is addressed to whom? So tell me what those intentions were? Don't you see everyone is jumping the gun? My assumption was that content disputes don't give a anti-homeopathy editor rights over a pro-homeopathy editor. Since the probation warning yesterday I have not touched the Deadly Nightshade article. However an anti-homeopathy editor has reverted twice in the span of a few hours without any consensus. He has ignored editors on the talk page that are trying to work towards an agreement. Before yesterday I would have reverted his edit at least once. But due to the warning I avoided the article page and focus my attention on the talk page. Instead of touching the talk page, I brought the issue to AN/I. What have I done wrong?   "