"
@Alanscottwalker, No, you don't be silly. The nature of Wikipedia means that you cannot make a convincing argument based solely on what other articles user or not use. In Wikipedia nothing is stopping anybody creating any template or article. There are plenty of articles that use collapsed templates, that probably should not. So, to argue that the fact that other articles use collapsed templates somehow implies Muhammad's article should do it too, is in itself a scorn-worthy fallacy. @Anthonyhcole - no, it's not. In any case, in an encyclopaedia editors' taste shouldn't matter much. We're here to display information as opposed to showing our ""taste"". here "