"

 Candidates for deletion - not ""town tramway systems."" 

The following are candidates for deletion from this list because they are (were), arguably, not ""town tramway systems:""

Akayu, Tokyo-Kanamachi: Labeling these systems as ""town tramways"" seems far-fetched; see Wakuda.
Nikkō: More of a rural tramway than a ""town tramway.""
Ichinomiya: More of an electric light railway than a ""town tramway.""
Takaoka: Admittedly, a borderline case, but on the suburban or electric light railway side of the border.
Kyoto-""Keihan Keishin Line,"" Never a ""town tramway;"" certainly not so today.
Osaka-Kobe; Ōita - Beppu: Admittedly borderline cases, but on the suburban / intercity side of the border. 
Karatsu: Suburban/rural in character.
Kitakyūshū - Nōgata: Electric light railway, never a ""town tramway,"" certainly not so today.

Kurume-Mameda  (phonetic transcription of 豆田 remains unverified): This entry needs to be reworked along the lines of Niigata - provided that such a service was in fact operated within Kurume. Neither Wakuda nor Haraguchi establish this.

Saga: Neither Wakuda nor Haraguchi establish that this was a ""town tramway,"" rather than a suburban or rural tramway - or one licensed as a public carrier but in fact serving some military function. The latter might help to explain the curious lack of photographs; Haraguchi presented no photos and Wakuda stated that he had never seen one.   "