"
It seems to me that the facticity of the statement is not being questioned, only the publication making the statement and the political slant (""corporate media""). It would be easy to represent the material in an attributed manner. As far as I'm concerned, it is a noteworthy aspect of this event that it was not covered by the larger media outlets. If there is doubt regarding the power of corporate advertising money to influence the media, there are many studies available examining that phenomena, and it doesn't delve into conspiracy theory. 連絡 見学/迷惑 "