"
In response to User:Viridae telling me that we were going to lots of trouble over something that would be deleted anyway, I said, Meh, let the guy feel happy. I've put a  on Credit card to satiate (now corrected to say placate) him. I figure it won't do any harm and can be removed if/when the article goes bye bye. I just want him to stop pinging me on IRC with his s. )—•(talk) 

Why I said ""all those things""...taking them one at at time... 
First sentence: I don't mind doing a lot of work to help someone out, even if I think that it is towards something that will eventually be deleted. I feel that the simple act of responding to someone else's good faith request for help is inherently worthy of my time. 
Second sentence: You seemed to be concerned over people's ability to find your article and impatient about how nothing was being done about it. What I did was to add something that would enable people to find your article and address your apparent concern.
Third sentence: I was/am fairly certain that the AfD discussion I linked to earlier will result in deletion of the article and its associated articles, including the article that I linked to using , especially since the first time it was there it was a unanimous decision to delete. This is no reflection on you. It is merely that I don't think the article is sufficiently noteworthy for inclusion on Wikipedia given our standards. I don't think any harm is done by linking to it, but if your article is deleted we will need to remove the link to it.
Fourth sentence: Every time you use  it creates a new alert in the IRC channel I was trying to get you to join. It is quite annoying when people repeatedly use it. 
I hope that clarifies things. I thought that I had helped you in pointing you towards the AfD, explaining where to find things and the rationale behind their movement. The fact that I disagree with you about the inclusion of the article shouldn't invalidate all the help I gave, should it? That doesn't seem right to me. I am sorry if you felt that I was being egregiously unhelpful. I want you to know that I have argued on your behalf against blocking you, but if you continue to threaten disruptive behavior to make a point regarding your feelings of unjust deletion I will no longer be able to assume good faith. Please feel free to leave a civil message on my talk page any time you wish. I will respond promptly unless stated otherwise.—•(talk) "