I am starting to get confused. Perhaps you could just tell me whatever it is that you tell yourself to justify not responding to me. If you had a reasonable answer it would be best to just give it. I'll repost the questions above incase you're unclear on what I would like answers too.

has the community not gotten smaller? 
was it not caused by the automobile? 
have I not sourced the statement as asked? 
is it not a fact? 
is it not information? 
does it not help inform people as to why foresters falls is not as large as it seemingly once was? 
is it not the only peice of information in the article that bridges the span of time between 1870 and present? 
is the usfullness of the edit the only criteria used to determine if it will be reverted or not?

and I'll just go ahead and add:

Why it is better to not have the statement than to have it?
Does this information not answers a pertinant question left open by the article?
If I were to refrase the sentance would that be better? 
What criteria was used to determine that it should be removed?
Why insist on the removal of this perfectly sensible statement?

I'll also go ahead and post this on the disscussion board for Forsters Falls aswell.

If you could try to treat me like a person and just respond to this post that would be great. Wouldn't you want to get a response? and if you can not, in any way, justify the edit perhaps you should consider the possibility that it was infact not justified and as such should be reverted. maybe? maybe any human can make mistakes? 
Thank you so much Mr. FromHell I'll see you tommorow (unless I get an answer)