"

Sure; however, I was the one who started this Wiki Page, and by means have done no large ""controversial"" edits. Moreover, I continue to cite sources, while some add POV, without citing sources - which I think is ""controversial"" considering the ""strong views"" some have on this subject, and certainly an adversity to historical fact. Moreover, this article is just getting started; yet some continue to act as if the current version is perfect. It is not, again, it is just getting started. As for the linking, and formatting - again - it is just getting started; and if not for the ""instant reverts"" would most likely be easier to fill out before getting to small edits. I started the current version since some did not find this article interesting until deciding to add POV to the subject matter without much knowledge, and more importantly, historical facts, on this subject itself. So, to achieve balance, and POV, citing sources is best, while remaining true to Wikipedia's ""be bold"" motto, and verifying sources, with NPOV. "