"

 Dithering here... 

I'm sorry we haven't met sooner.  There is another you may wish to acquaint yourself with.  His name is User:TharkunColl, an Anglo-Saxonist.  English traditionalists (even the pro-Celtic, pro-Roman) are apparently the bane of the British Isles here at Wikipedia, but I don't know about that in real life, considering such a sentiment is supposedly more tolerant.  Yes, it's said to be more accepting than the ""proud Teutonic"" approach to English identification, although it seems as though the Celtofascists here are trying to spin the English alone as ""foreign"" to the Isles, even though it is easy to discover the Celtic origins in Roman Europe, especially the Brythonic kind (as much as Anglo-Saxon European ties are to the post-Classical Rome of Charlemagne and other Holy Roman ""Germanics"").  They think that pro-Celtic, pro-Roman means hostile cultural appropriation, as they have identified you as ""the other"", the big pink elephant in the room.  It is a sight for sore eyes to see how you manage to reconcile hostile, ""mutual-exclusionary"" factions of Celt, Roman and German, for most ""people"" involved in these articles have one agenda to push or another, but hardly any singular Romanists, I'm afraid.  Perhaps I should try that.  Imagine the double-whammy of negativity from the ""Celto-Germanicists"".  Ahh...there's no way to achieve anything in any of this without some bloodshed, it seems.

Incidentally, if you'd like to get worked up elsewhere, go check out the archives of that talk page...here, for instance.  In that article, it is apparently considered nonsense by  that the Greeks bestowed the name ""British Isles"" upon that set of islands off of Gaul and that is the ultimate origin, as they instead focus exclusively upon the Tudor-Stuart settlement (extreme violation of WP:WEIGHT and barely even narrowly WP:SYNTH, so wrapped up in violations of WP:NOR!) which modernised the term and put ancient ethnic vagueness into political effect (nor do they care to see that Roman Britain was only that part of Albion, that part of the BI in total which had been conquered or annexed through treaty by Rome, even as Erin would go free...not contradicting the fact that they are both ""British"", whatever that originally meant aside from the Trojan story).  Just about any and all BI related pages are vicious black holes and often, the only way to go about it, is by using extreme caution and wisdom.  You will find that whilst your attackers see fit to add and add as they wish, their abuse of you is based upon their own convictions of what they would like to edit one way or the other and if you don't fit their profile, then ""you are wrong"", not just what you happen to do or write, it is a personal vendetta to expunge all of your works.  Many times, after selecting a target, they are simply being difficult and if they are lucky enough, they will have provoked thee into becoming banned, just to see you squirm, as they do whatever it is they wish, to put the spin on this or that subject, according to their absolutist truisms.  Of course, you are unable to do anything about it when your editing privileges are revoked and the admins won't even bother to level the playing field for you, only acquiesce to their demands based in vilification and lynchmobbery.  They will, most likely, base their complaints upon ""improper procedures"", which is Orwellian codespeak for ""we don't like what he stands for, let's overwhelm him in numbers"".

All said, it is very nice to meet you...you, like me, with a youthful tenure here being quite deceiving, would probably enjoy this a lot.  I've been a fan for the longest time, of you, TharkunColl,   "