"

 ==Tbma own original research 

First Tbma only a few days after calling this whole article a hoax has fund a new sources to breakdown this article to crap.

First he claims the Soviet had preplanned its withdraw from the front, but Finnish sources who is supported by POW interview, intellegnce data and Otho Manninen extended archives research in SOviet/Russian archives have pinpointed exactlly witch Soviet units where pressent in the battle and when they left.

What we now for certaint is: The composistion of the Soviet major combat formations where pressent, they Soviet was reinforced by 100 tanks and SPG before the battle, and during the battle 21 Soviet army sent more of its formation in to the battle. 

This contradics any statment of withdraw to other fronts or the redicules low figure as only 60000 Soviet red army men.

What about Tbma sources?

The Sources of 60000 men from ""Punaiset panssarit - Puna-armeijan panssarijoukot 1918-1945"" is by no mean to be seen as a final statment over the battle as the book is abour red army tank, and just uses a few phrases on the Tali-Ihantala battle.

On the ""withdraw"" is issue i cant find the first source:under ed. Zolotarev V.A. (1999). Russkij arkhiv: Velikaya Otechestvennaya. STAVKA VGK: Dokumenty i materialy 1944-1945. [Russian Archive. The Great Patritic War. STAVKA. Documents and materials 1944-45]. Moscow: Terra. p. 97. ISBN 5-300-01162-2.  The second 
^ Vasilevsky, Aleksandr (1978). Delo moyei zhizni [The point of my life]. Moscow: Politizdat. p. Does in NO WAY support TBMA case and i wonder why its even there? The third:^ N.I. Baryshnikov (2006). ""Fenomen falshi: ""Pobeda v protivostoyanii. Finskaya istoriografiya o zavershayushchikh boyakh leta 1944 g. s sovetskimi voyskami"" [The fenomen of lies: The victory in the confrontation. Finnish historiography about final battles of summer ""-is so vauge in deatails that it contradicts with deatailed sources like Manninens on the event but gives no fact like witch units was withdraw? when where they withdrawn? The value of this text is very poor, and if it should be in the text it should be moved down to section like Russian neo facist view of the battle
  "