"

 Don - This is classic - You wrote 10 pounds of stuff, took off in a tangent, and didn't even answer my question under discussion requiring no more than a simple yes/no objective response. Then you went ahead and reversed my deletion in the article without discussing it here. Please get consensus before making any article changes.
 I took a closer look at your source for the ""under 18"" thing and found a few issues:
 1. It is a paid report costing $30 to access. How can any editor verify that you aren't making bogus claims? 
 2. This article seems to be referring to meditation in general and not Sahaj Marg, so it's not relevant to this discussion - You may want to place it in the meditation article.
 3. It is speaking of the inappropriateness of meditation from a pediatric standpoint (supposedly - I haven't read it). The wiki article on pediatrics says that this science is relevant to children up to 14 to 21 of age. So how is this specifically relevant to the ""18 years of age"" point under discussion here? If you want to put in a criticism of Sahaj Marg making younger children meditate, don't hide it in an irrelevant footnote. 
 4. Finally, the sentence ""Sahaj Marg guru recommends a minimum age of 18 before beginning the practice of meditation, implying this technique is not suitable for younger people."" is your extrapolation of the motivations for the SRCM rules, i.e. original research. Not admissible. I will be removing the ""implying this technique is not suitable for younger people"" part. 
 Please try to be brief, objective and to the point in your response.   "