"Okay, so I edit this article so that it matches with Beyonce Knowles', which I was then planning on doing to Jackee Harry's because I like the wording format in Beyonce's article. Fair enough plan, right? Apparently ""not,"" according to this ""Bookkeeper"" person, because then later she/he comes in and reverts it, giving me this: ""Due to the ambiguity of her current last name, we reached consensus to introduce her this way.""

""Ambiguity,"" huh? What's so ""ambiguous"" about it? Why is this supposedly ""different"" from how Beyonce is knownusually only called by her first name, but still introduced in the 'pedia with ""best known mononymously as Beyoncé""? What's the supposed ""difference"" between knowing Ms. Ciccone publicly by only her first name and knowing Ms. Knowles publicly by only her first name? What supposedly makes Ciccone ""more ambiguous,"" according to Bookkeeper, than Knowles, so much that it was supposedly ""better"" to introduce them differently? Why ""can't we"" just introduce Ciccone the same way as we introduce Knowles?

""Maxx Fordham""

"