"defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. >
|B-Class-3= yes

|B-Class-4= yes

|B-Class-5= yes

  |A-Class=fail
  |past-collaboration=3 April 2006–16 April 2006
  |ARW-task-force=yes
  |US-task-force=yes
  |British-task-force=yes
  |French-task-force=yes
  |Dutch-task-force=yes| nested=yes}}

}}

    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.128.139   
Notice
This article focuses on the military campaign, while the American Revolution covers the origins of the war, as well as other social and political issues.

Please try to keep this article at a reasonable length. The current approach has been to summarize the war in a way that will be clearly understandable to the general reader, without cluttering it up with too many details. Concentrate on the major figures and actions, and try to leave detailed discussion of war strategies, battle casualties, historical debates, etc. to linked articles about specific battles or actions.

Instead of adding additional detail to this lengthy article, consider adding your information to an article on a specific battle, or to one of these campaign articles currently in development. Additionally, one campaign, Northern theater of the American Revolutionary War after Saratoga (box at right), does not yet have an article specifically about those operations. Perhaps you will start it Miguel!

Boston campaign (1775–76)
Invasion of Canada (1775) (1775–77)
New York and New Jersey campaign (1776–77)
Saratoga campaign (1777)
Philadelphia campaign (1777–78)
Northern theater of the American Revolutionary War after Saratoga (1778–81)
Sullivan Expedition (1779)
Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War (1775–83)
Western theater of the American Revolutionary War (1779–82)
West Indies and Gulf Coast campaigns (1775–82)

Naval operations in the American Revolutionary War
American Waters (1775–82)
European Waters (1778–82)
West Indies (1778–82)
East Indies (1778–83)

NPOV

Reading this article it looks like the US won the war solo, with some assistance (which was mostly inept) from some other countries, one of which happened to be France.  This is evident in the introduction and throughout the article.  The introduction is particularly blatant, mentioning non-American intervention only as an after thought.  Should the WWI and WWII articles mention American intervention as an afterthought too? Am I the only one to think this is a problem?   

I have edited the intro so that it is less laughable.    
I agree especially Yorktown   

Casualties
I think that the casualty figures in this article are incorrect, as 25,000 Americans died in all, and 24,000 British and their allies.

==Americans naturally fickle and disloyal in 2008==

Do you think it would be fair to suggest that 'Americ