"

Please note that I never called him or any other editor a ""liar"" ever. Before the last ANI I had commented about Wee's clear misrepresentation of facts as ""lies"" about 4 times, these are all presented at that ANI. After that I toned it down to ""misrepresent of facts/comments"" or ""untrue statements"" simply because there is no other way of calling it. Have you looked at the diffs presented in that ANI by Wee and me? Can you point to any specific one where I have failed to present evidence (or the evidence presented was insufficient) as to back my claims of him misrepresenting my comments? As I've said, other editors agreed that if an editor makes it a habit to engage in such disruptive behaviour it is not a personal attack to mention it. How would you react to an editor purposely and repeatedly misrepresenting your comments in a discussion? Do you not agree that such behaviour should be brought to the attention of that editor?
It would appear as if you looked at the former ANI and took Wee's word for granted about me ""casually calling him a liar"". Let me repeat myself: I have not, there's a big difference between calling an editor a ""liar"" and pointing out that he is simply ""lying"" (for which I have provided evidence absolutely every time).
You say I'm in the wrong for stating that Wee ""made untrue statements"" and apparently believe I've not presented evidence for such. How can I defend myself if you don't tell me a specific occasion where I did so? Every time I commented on his misrepresentation of facts I have provided evidence for it. How else could I appeal this block if you don't comment specifically on my supposed violations of WP:NPA? Regards.   "