"

 Wikipedia: Index of Information, or Theological Authority? 
As far as I was concerned, Wikipedia is a place for information, not a place to assert beliefs. ""Maria is truly the Mother of God (De Fide). ...if Mary was not Mother of God, then Jesus was in fact not God."" Really now! Is that a ""fact?"" Or is that the authoritive Roman Catholic view? Since it is, that is how it should be stated: ""According to Roman Catholicism, Maria is thee mother of god,"" as opposed to presenting this as ""fact."" This is an encyclopedia, not a Roman Catholic mouthpiece. I don't adhere to Christianity or any religion for that matter, but I find this assertion absurd. Assuming for a moment, that there is actually a figure called ""god"" and there was a personage named ""Mary/Maria,"" and the ""Bible"" is the ultimate authority, ""if Mary was not Mother of God, then Jesus was in fact not God"" is an theologically anachronistic statement. If ""in the beginning, god created the heaven and earth,"" and Mary came a long time afterwards, then we have a big problem, because if Mary is THEE mother of god, then god couldn't have been around to create Adam, Even and all the people leading up to Mary. If god existed before Mary, and Jesus was supposed to be god, than this would make Mary basically a surrogate womb with no connection to god whatsoever. I'm no Christian, but please. Present the views and beliefs as they are, views and beliefs, and not as matter-of-fact, thank you.  "