"
{{unblock | reason= 
Derogatory comments about other contributors may be removed by any editor. The statement is not about content I've added to this entry- of which there isn't any to speak of. (I could have opinions and theories about his mother but I don't go around posting them).  Instead User:scray choose to post the following message and block me.  ""I don't see much evidence that this user is constructively engaged in improving this page or basing content on reliable sources."" This is equally as offensive as were the comments of the other editors- nor is the statement even true. You don't see much evidence because my properly sourced submissions are reverted. I ask you or any other editor to show me one misuse of a source. This is a a link to my last edit on the entry. diff  I include it as it was correctly sourced using per-approved sources that had consensus and the changes concerning definitions in the entry were discussed on the talk page and also had consensus..
Disruptive edit, not an improvement? That opinion is not supportable.

The changes were made to bring the entry into compliance with WP:lead standards because the definitions were faulty. .

Now I ask you (again #2), what content have I submitted on that page that had an unreliable source as you've alleged when blocking me? You have made the same unfounded accusation as the other two editors.  Regardless of what you think of another editor's edits, keep that to your self! If you post a derogatory comment about me and can't back up the statement, you are lying too apparently simply in an attempt to damage my credibility. It is that simple. Now I formally ask you to Point out the reference are referring to in your negative posts about me!  This is not a difference of opinion.  It is a fabrication and a personal attack upon my credibility.  Comment on content, not on the contributor. You commented on both! and were not truthful in your comment about the content and sources.  Derogatory comments about other contributors may be removed by any editor.  Instead, you added more of them.

In addition, for like the fourth time, this person decides to call me ""a full blown believer and pusher of this conspiracy theory"" which I repeatedly denied.  I took offense.
Both other editors received talk messages from me. After you came along, One editor user: Dbrodbeck apologized for his statement..  I appreciate that and accept his apology and will tell him so when unblocked.  The other person user:Brangifer received a call for truce on his talk page but refused to retract his comment.  He has repeated attacked my credibility and now has thrown out a serious accusation without one shred of foundation or substance and banned me from his talk page.  His badgering continues on the entry talk page without apology or any shred of anything to substantiate his offensive comment. 

To have User:scray come along and say stuff like "" Regardless of what you think of another editor's edits, name-calling (a personal attack) won't go well.""  I did not call a name. I called a spade a spade and gave good evidence that I was calling it as it presented itself. I did not comment on his edits, I commented the fact that he did not consider my reference to  articles from the Washington post, San Francisco Chronicle, Associated press, and National archives of the Government of Canada to be reliable sources.  Unbelievably, you seem be echoing his position.  I probably won't post this elsewhere but if you can't show me an example of using a poor source on that page, it is obvious that you have also posted the same fabrication about me in reference to sources. Anyone who fabricates or perpetuates or posts derogatory information is a liar. Liars cannot be trusted and lying editors compromise the integrity of WP.  user:Scray said ""I don't see much evidence that this user is constructively engaged in improving this page or basing content on reliable sources.""  User:scray needs to show me where evidence was seen by him that had I based something in the entry on an unreliable source (#3).  User:scray  can not substantiate the posted comment the made. If you don't prove it with an example, then your statement is a lie. If you find yourself in this situation, then you are a liar and you have personally attacked this editors credibility. If that is the case, I'd