"
Cynwulfe and Davidiad, I think you got a fine piece of work here. I'll do a review. Let me get a couple of quick and simple questions out of the wayI hope you don't mind a piecemeal approach; I find that it helps to get things out of the way on a first read.
Why Tzetzes, and not John Tzetzes? I clicked through to see if it was a title that needed to be italicized. Also, I'm a great fan of the appositive/adjectival introduction, ""the twelfth-century Byzantine poet and grammarian John Tzetzes"" (and in that case you can drop John).
""The poet completes his treatment""we don't know the poet's gender, and the appropriate section says nothing about it. Consider that the poetic phallus is not a penis. ) 
More later: apparently laundry takes precedence over poetry. I know, it's a fucked-up world.   
 Done.  Thanks, Drmies.  It was just Tzetzes because that's what I call him, forgetting that even some classicists have never read of him (and that his poor brother Isaac wallowed with him).   { t } 
 Do we need to do the GA subpage thang?   { t } 
I don't know, DavidiadI just started the template and it looks like hell. If you can fix it that'd be great. This isn't some fill in the blank kind of thing. Also, please define ""verse"" at its first occurrence, possibly connecting it with ""line"" which is wikilinked nearby.   
 Stuck in a link to dactylic hexameter for now.  Currently making dinner—will think of a more graceful and efficient way to keep the concepts of verse and stichometry at the fore: this while trying to retain the ridiculous construction ""in part or entire"" which strains the copulative properties of ""survive"".   { t } 
"