"

Warning You deleted, in the Larry Craig article,  the documented mention of the press coverage of the Rogers outing the following three times within the last 24 hours. The section appears to comply with WP:BLP as it lists mainstream media coverage of the accusation and denial, rather than the unconfirmed claim itself. Further reverts may result in a block. The section has been called by other names, so if that is your only objection, you could discuss changing to the earlier name of the section, or removing the section name, since yeaterday the info was just included under the “Personal” section rather than ""Unconfirmed rumor."" Please improve the article by negotiating NPOV wording in the Talk section rather than by serial reverting.  If  the material violates WP:BLP or is libelous, so that the #RR does not apply, then reverts made to enforce this provision are generally not considered contentious. However, it can be easy to confuse removing potentially libellous material with an edit war over neutrality issues, which are contentious edits. Err on the side of caution: do not repeatedly remove material you consider defamatory unless it is blatant, and seek intervention from others early at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard.:
Revision as of 06:24, 24 October 2006 (edit)
Tbeatty (Talk | contribs) 
(WP:BLP deleted improperly added ""unverified rumors"")
Revision as of 05:34, 24 October 2006 (edit)
Tbeatty (Talk | contribs) 
(→Unconfirmed rumors - BLP - no place in wikipeida for unconfirmed rumors)
Revision as of 00:21, 24 October 2006 (edit)
Tbeatty (Talk | contribs) 
(→Unconfirmed rumors - Does anybody really think a section called ""Unconfirmed Rumors"" belongs in a BLP (or anywhere else) in Wikipedia?)
 "