"

 I would also like to prove that C.Fred is biased in his decisions in that he cites this was a personal attack. On the Personal attack page it does NOT say in the subsection ""What is considered to be a personal attack"" anything regarding ""close variants of a name"" or anything of that matter. However it does say:

 ""Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. Serious accusations require serious evidence. Evidence often takes the form of diffs and links presented on wiki. Sometimes evidence is kept private and made available to trusted users.""
 
 How can you accuse someone of harrassment or a personal attack when the act in question is not documented in the criteria of what is considered to be a personal attack, yet say I am making a personal attack? Do you see me making any legal threats? Making fun of your race? Threatening to reveal something private of yours? No. You abused your powers, and it wasn't nice. I did nothing wrong except for being new to the wikipedia world and deciding to learn on the fly rather than reading every little detail whereas C.Fred is a veteran of the Wikipedia world and should know these rules and regulations."