"==Image copyright problem with Image:Ant4_1.gif==
Thanks for uploading Image:Ant4_1.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images.  If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.  If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Wikipedia:Image use policy
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by .  For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 

Hi. Further to this I see you've added a fair use tag, which seems to be appropriate to for the subject. You do however need to state the source of the image and who owns the copyright. It's a very cool image by the way. Thanks!  

 Sockpuppet 

I think the sockpuppet notice should be moved as a notice to the talk page. There was just one sockpuppet, and he is no longer using them and he (the main account) was not indef-blocked.  

 Page move vandalism 
Wikipedia has clear procedures on moving pages. Other than in exceptional circumstances all pages should be moved by following the instructions on the Requested Moves page. Unilateral moves can trigger edit wars, break links and cause a lot of problems. Please stop unilaterally moving pages, as you did with Kim Jong-il, and follow the correct procedure.     I gather English may not be your native language; article names should match common usage in English, and not (for instance) a transliteration of the Russian version.  
I see you have already been warned about this in regard to Sanhedrin, and you agreed to stop doing it to avoid getting blocked.  Well, please do stop.   

 Amenia 
Since you were one of the few regular users supporting me in the RfC, just wanted to say thanks.
You have any advice on the best way to go about a next step?
It seems so unfair that this little click can distort the borders of Europe 

Block

I have reverted nationalist anti-Soviet propaganda, mass deletion and removing the mention of Nazi collaborationist war crimes in Participants in World War II about once a day. I have been blocked in circumvent of the rules by a POV admin. The article should be restored to the pre-edit war status

Nixer, you reverted that article four times. I have blocked you for only 24 hours, although your repeated 3RR violations would usually warrant more, as would your ""POV admin"" remark above.  (T) 

Taking no position whether Nixer  deserves a block for revert warring, I must note that 4 reverts accumulated in 36, not 24 hours as per this. Staying under 3RR is no entitlement in any way and general revert warring is subject to admin's discretion blocks. However, in such case the admin should be uninvolved, unlike user:ProhibitOnions who was one of the editors who reverted Nixer. Again, I take no position on whether Nixer should be blocked for RV warring in general, just noting that technically 3RR is not there and blocking by admin who participates in article disagreement is highly inappropriate in such case.

All this aside, Nixer, you should cool down finally.  

Three of Nixer's reverts were within 24 hours and the fourth was the following morning, which I reverted, but subsequently restored. Furthermore, I am not a recent editor of this article, and am not thrilled by the attitude presented by either Nixer or the editors reverted; if there had been any genuine discussion, they might have been able to reach a compromise, as they were both presenting opposing national