As far as the bishop pages are concerned yes I did put up the version that bischof ralph has originally started BECAUSE i agree with alot of what that article states. It makes SENSE and for anyone who understands canoical law they would agree. But for those who dont i guess then you have a debate over who is wrong or who is right. But just becaquse i dont support the article that papphase or wine guy supports does not make me a sock, or a duck or a meat. 
and for your information, i did create an article about casino workers aka cigarette girls.
Unfortunately , I can not find ANY information on the internet regarding this article and ive been searching. I find it an interesting casino carreer because it is something i did experience myself. So, I have been searching for articles that i can add information too and so far the only one that ive been able to work on is the alfred page.. Bishop Napierski had all the research and info already done... But I think the way he worded things was confusing because obviously he does not write in English very well. Just because he might have abused multiple accounts does not mean that his findings are incorrect. And besides, its like this article must be important to others or something because everyone is like watching it like guard dogs for any new little changes and even one change and bam, major debates take place. But dont worry about that precious little article anymore... i quit editing it... its not worth the stress.
For now on ill stick to simple little projects like cigarrette girls and candy stripers.
Apparently there is no drama in those categories.
tsk
ps... i did really hope that maybe i might have gotten to know you a little better. you seemed like a very interesting person but now im not so sure i want to get to know anyone here.
quite sad if i must say so myself.
good day.