"::::::::That's quite arrogant of you, as an administrator using terms such as ""all you want"" is disresctful and arrogant. You have to show me where in this there is anything at all warrant to a warning, the entire issue revolve around this, since if it happens that there is indeed a mistake, one of the reasonable explainations would be that you tried to provoke me. I am not insulting you any more than you are insulting me. You provoke me by an empty warning and then block me because you qualify my answer to a provokation as block material even if the victim and provokator happens to be you. It is like an alleged victim acting as a judge and condemn the alleged agressor of his. Also, have in mind that abusing ones administrator provilages is worst than some insults percieved or real in a talkpage. There are various administrators who administered in articles or talkpages in which I have contributed, and I am not a newbie, and I rarely had any problem nor have I accused administrators the way I did with you, except for two newbie administrators chatting with Coolcat. Also, you must consider that politically heated articles more than often are not like others, and there might be incivility, but as long as there is a relevent exchange, administrators shall rather edit such incivilities unless it becomes overboard and incivility and personal attacks becomes a members only way of answering. In such articles people deal with pov pushing, and repeated edit warrings ad well as incivility, unless as an administrator you do not take the time to understand the context, it is for you futile to throw a warning because of one or to displaced words in an edit of hundreds or perhaps over a thousand word. Now, since your block is not justifiable, I request an unblock and I am ready to forget this incident.  (ix) 

"