"
 User:Cosprings 
Please see User_talk:Cosprings#Mass_deletions_without_explanations.  This has apparently been going on for some time.   
Thanks for the heads up!  I intended to leave him a message, but got distracted. -The '45 

 Regarding your email 
Go ahead.  32 
I've looked things over.  I don't see anything that requires a block or administrative action in any way.  This is a new user who is unfamiliar with Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines and needs to be gently directed that way.  Ask him to use the article talk page and discuss the matter cordially with him.  The sort of things you sent me go one many times every day on Wikipedia.  I could find a dozen or more conversations in the last 24 hours that look functionally identical to the one you sent me, and it isn't particularly unusual or out of the norm.  It's just someone who is unfamiliar with Wikipedia, and upset because they don't understand how Wikipedia works.  In the spirit of WP:DOLT we need something like WP:DOCOI: Don't Overlook Conflicts of Interest.  People with conflicts of interest may have valid concerns about article content, we shouldn't brush them off as though they don't have something valuable to add to the discussion.  We should instead try to work with them in alleviating their concerns, or at least educate them in Wikipedia's policies (keeping in mind they are an outsider).  Be gentle and clear.  That's my advice.  Also, direct him to express his concerns on-wiki rather than via email; discussions of article content should happen in the open.  32 

Wondering what you think
Hello TOJ. I agree with your removal of the multitude of run times in the Once Upon a Time in America. On the other hand I would ask you to consider including the European run time of 229 minutes. Various considerations include the fact that runtime is the one that premiered at Cannes also we include both the Cannes and US release dates in the infobox and we could label the two runtimes the same way. One other thing, while I can't remember the exact time frame but I know the 229m version did get showings in the US within a few months (maybe weeks) of the short versions release because, much like the two releases of Brazil, I held off going to the theater until I could see the longer version. If you disagree that is okay this was just a suggestion. If you want to move this discussion to the films talk page that is okay too. Cheers and have a good week.  | Talk 
I agree with you.  If the 229 min. version was show at Cannes, that time should be in the infobox.  That was a mistake on my part.  Thanks for letting me know. -The '45 

 America: Freedom to Fascism 
You removed the a ""Conspiracy Theory"" category from that article, as being already in a subcategory.  I don't see it.  Perhaps you intended to move it to Category:Documentary films about conspiracy theories, but it wasn't there, and I'm not sure it is accurate.  It's more ""Documentary films which are conspiracy theories"", but I'm not sure of your intent.  —   (talk) 
I am not sure what I was doing earlier... but, I think Category:Documentary films about conspiracy theories is accurate. -''''''The '45 

 Jjjakegittes/Jkta97 
At it again... already reported to WP:AIV. Just thought you'd want to know, since you've been warning him for a while now.   
Yes, thanks for the heads up! -