"

 Back to the facts: conquest/annexed into so-called ""Serbia"" 

Why has everyone got a problem with a damn good well written neutral source from a neutral country (UK) free to edit newspaper??? Kosova was conquered, right? It was 75% Albanian, right? It was never legally drafted into Serbia, we know because if there was a real ""treaty in London"" then Noel Maclom would have added it to his ""Is Kosova Serbia?"" article. I prefer to use the term ""annexed"" because it was a completely illegal incorporation into the territory. And as Malcolm said (if you read the source), after 1918, it went back to being a self-governing (by it's Albanians) land within a ""Yugoslavia"" NOT part of Serbia. I believe Serbia's first ever involvement with Kosova after 1912 was when in 1989 Milosevic made his famous ""Greater Serbia"" speech in Kosova, started to move Serbs into the county and then send his Serb troops to invade the land and expand Serbia's territory, followed by the ethnic cleansing of Albanians/non-Serbs, and genocide of the rest. It was also then that ""Metohia"" was added to the name and I know this because as I said before, I have Kosovan friends. BBC/Sky all adhere too. Or are they not reliably neutral?   "