Apologies - I had understood after the assistance and feedback you gave last time it was ok to go, and we just we needed to get  to review given they may have had their own critique and a separation of roles (remove conflict of interest given you provided guidance updating the article). I had understood that you had agreed it was OK to go-live as is... From the above, are you suggesting I need further updates to references? If so, this is fine, but I'd be keen to do this before my next decline. Any help would be great.