"Racebending gained traction as reliable source after Roger Ebert and several other sources used Racebending as a source of news, which would make it a reliable source by Wikipedia's standards. In addition, the writer himself, has been asked as ""Mike has been interviewed about media diversity by reliable of news organizations on the issue he's writing about, including the Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, BBC Radio, and Public Radio International"" says. I say it's a notable allegation especially the follow up comments with the Jim Sturgess comment in response to such allegations (in which he responded to the allegations of racism by being a jerk... but MO, which was screencapped.)

I should also remind you that this is not a forum. So if the people agree with the assessment or not doesn't make it more or less valid. Personally, I would say that it would go into the critical reception section. And the Jim Sturgess comments should be mentioned as it is a reply. (A stupid reply, yes, but it is an official reply). http://www.racebending.com/v4/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/twitter_jimsturgess011.jpg   

"