Of course it was inappropriate language - and I am bound to apologise. Edit summaries are trickier places for this sort of thing as they are added in the spur of the moment and there is no taking them back once they're made. On the other hand some of your own remarks (not to me, but to other editors) on the open talk page, have also not been very conducive to the assumption of good faith. Pots calling kettles black and all that. Not that I mean that as any excuse, 'cause it's not, but ... I haven't looked yet, but I do hope any response to my remarks there was taken in the kindly spirit in which they were meant.