"

 Thoughts on Editing war 

In all honest Caleb, I feel your argument is valid. As an outsider that just started reading Seth Speaks mid last year. I did my own research on this topic to seeing a big difference in how it currently being presented. Have you tried contacting the people directly associated with the book? I feel that Wikipedia administratration is being unfair to Celeb. With lack of sensiblity and respect of his efforts to express the works of actual writers and editors in a domain he isn't familiar with. I made an account just so I express my words of gratitude for your efforts Caleb of preserving the message of this topic in an unbiased way! Don't give up, for the people directly invovle with this topic will side with you...Took me a while to figure this out ) 
  

 FYI, Caleb is topic banned from this article. As to ""side with you"", be very careful about siding with Caleb. He has violated a number of policies during his efforts to protect this subject and even got blocked. He was unblocked only after promising not to edit this article. You should also read about meatpuppetry: ""A new user who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, may be subject to the remedies applied to the user whose behavior they are joining."" If your behavior becomes too similar to his, the duck test may apply. It hasn't yet, and I'm hoping to save you trouble.

 I am providing this advice to save to from running into the same problems which have hounded his editing. I'll leave a welcome template on your talk page. It contains links to our policies and guidelines. Please read them. Good luck here. BTW, this also applies to the Jane Roberts article.     

 Always good to welcome a new user with threats . . . 70.186.173.82  

It's nice to see that someone else sees things the way I do.  That ""welcome"" note was very threatening indeed.  

 Personal attacks removed by 2/0 per talk page guidelines.
 Oasisoftheheart, thank you for your supportive comments.  "