"
The COI tag, like most others, is a form of clean up notification. It's supposed to indicate that an article was authored by, or underwent a major edit by a conflicting party to other editors, who may then neutralise the content. It is not supposed to have full-time residence on the article once clean up has been performed and the editor/s with any COI cease to disruptively affect the neutrality of the article (which should really be brought to admin attention, not via a tag). Keeping it once the article has been made neutral is misleading and also makes Wiki articles ""ugly"". There are thousands of articles on Wiki where the original author was closely-related to the content. Once an uninvolved editor steps in and makes the tone/content neutral the tag is no longer valid. Its purpose is to serve as a warning that the content may not be neutral to other editors. Given than a lot of editors have since taken control of the matter here, and are enforcing measures to prevent Dom and those closely related to Davina from introducing puffery, peacocking and any other bollocks, there isn't really any need to ""warn"" anyone that the content may be untrue. I'm sure if or when Davina's meatpuppet ""fans"" make edits they are quickly spotted, verified and removed if unsupported. As such, I recommend removing the tag, in due course, once the minor disputes are settled. Tags are aids for editors to develop the article as fore mentioned, they should not be used in the spirit of a warning system to general readers.  [Chat • RFF] "