"== Mattissee ==

Hi, I was thinking to move all the detail regarding   
Technically, yes, but as the case is still being discussed internally, I don't think any changes should be made for now.   
Ok, I will of course accept any internal decision regarding this issue.   

 Additions to a SPI that you clerked 

I apologise for creating a moving target but since you clerked Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Vikraantkaka#29_June_2011 I have come across two registered users who may be connected to the original case. I have added those to the SPI since it has not yet been closed. You may want to take a look, but I apologise if I am wasting your time. There is something fishy going on but working out what is problematic. -   

 Template:NewDRNsubmission 

Hi again Steve! This is just to let you know I left a message on WP:DRN talk about the template I made. New features and docs are now finished ) —  ♫ 

 Abortion titles mediation 

I'll tell you right now, if we don't see significantly more response, your idea, regardless of its merits, isn't going anywhere.  A way must be found to increase participation.   
There's no way to force someone to participate, mediation in itself is voluntary. It might be a good idea to send another round of notifications, but this time, with wording that encourages them to add their opinion eg ""A proposal has been made to rename the two abortion articles to completely new names"". The idea, which is located at Link, is currently open for opinions. Your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated"" or something like that anyway. That should hopefully kick the discussion up a gear.  The clock is ticking.... 
I think giving some additional exposure to that discussion is a good idea. But personally I think the matter is likely to have been settled which is why I haven't made any further points. Unless there is a big change in opinion after 30 days you should just move the articles to their new titles.    
The issue is mentioned on the abortion-rights talk page, but notifying involved parties (as listed on the mediation talk page) might be a wise move to take.  The clock is ticking.... 
I did that as soon as that list was made.    
Sure, but it might be wise to post them a reminder like the one I recommended.  The clock is ticking.... 
Fair enough.    

Well, between Eraserhead and I, I think it's safe to say that every single editor who touched either of those two pages over the past year has been notified. We'll just have to see what happens.   
Well, the input has certainly increased significantly. Good luck to you sorting out all the opinions.  No rush, though.  I think you should wait at least a month before deciding anything.   
Indeed, input has increased. I think letting discussion car