"

So Jezz gets to personally attack, assume bad faith, and violate WP policy by removing chunks of material from my own comment in an article Talk page.   Gotcha.   I do not accept your decision as valid, fair, or equitably applied.  I only wrote on Jezz's talk page because he was violating WP policy and insulting me and undoing my comments on the article talk page, and ignoring and disrespecting all the work and good-faith presentations I made on the article talk page.   You agree iwth him removing chunks of my comment on the article talk page, though WP does not allow that? You're facilitating bad behavior on HIS part...by totally ignoring it, or not seeing it, and singling me out in this matter.   Very wrong.  Did you even read what I wrote on your talk page?  I'm not saying I was necessarily totally perfect in the edit situation time-line or in my tone on the talk page. My point, sir, is Jezz has been farrr from perfect himself, and has definitely violated WP policy, yet you won't even see it, or get on him for it, or block him for doing all this.   You notice I did not ""personally attack"" Doug Weller or Tgeorgescu.   Why?  Because they were civil and cool.  (And you never gave me a full chance to even defend myself on the notice board page.   So I don't agree at all with your action.)  Jezz has been unquestionably out of line and you don't see any of his stuff on the ARTICLE talk page, or the nonsense and bad-faith insults and accusations and negativity he hurled at me left and right.  Why is that?   "