The flaws? What flaws? This is exactly the crux of my point. If anyone has reason to suspect there are flaws, they should address those instead of putting down boilerplates, which is a cop-out. It's a community effort to make this article work, but boilerplates do not constitute 'effort', they are like giving up and walking away. Spraypainting a tree 'this needs to be check for deadfall'. But it just makes the tree ugly, for no good reason. Same goes for this article.