"

op-eds are worthless sources when they don't work for chrisO's narrative; must-reads which establish the fact of the matter when they do work for chrisO's narrative. court-appointed forensic ballistics experts are ""fringe kooks"" also.

side note, i actually added text which stated discretly that the libel conviction had been overturned by a higher court, but that was rv'd. the operative definition here for npov violation, after all is ""not chrisO's pov.""

"