"
 Err, no, not quite. G didn't ""request"" anything, G asserted that NW was ""judged to be biased"" (apparently, G is doing the judging, though you can't tell that from what he wrote; perhaps G usually talks in the 3rd person) and G ""barred"" (again, apparently on his own authority) NW. Since G has no such authority, the judgement and the barring are meaningless; though if re-phrased as requests (as I suppose you're suggesting) they might become meaningful   "