"
This is not a debate. ""Persuading"" people is not how wikipedia works - or else everything would be edited via mob-rule. The reasoning behind inclusion is not sufficient, and just saying ""undue"" is not particularly persuasive. I've responded to every dispute rather meticulously and editors seem to just add more reasons why it should be gone. The BBC recognized the allegation, notable 3rd party organizations were involved, and all of this was covered by reliable sources. How this is undue...I do not know.   "