"
Please consult the article Ball culture, which states ""drag queen, or transgendered"". WP:OR does not cover synthesis by bringing two facts together.  As well, the term ""Femme queen"" does not have an article, so the term is currently of dubious usage as it's a neologism, (which WP policy suggests to avoid using).  You state a source: ""TGMSMNET"", however neither this page, nor the mainpage refer to such a reference.  From the way you talked about it, I linked it to the ""MSTSW"" reference.  In the future, if you could, could you please site resources on this page by using this form? [http://example.com http://example.com] That way it shows up like this http://www.example.com, and one can simply click on the resource, rather than search through the article for the reference itself.  Your data is backed up there as well.  However, we still have issue... how would the CDC consider a post-op MTF living in stealth as anything else but a ""female""... the MTF would obviously not admit to being a transsexual, and in fact engages in no activity any more risky than a ""biological"" female.  (I wait for further evidence that TG/TS is caused by biological factors, and thus the term ""biological male/female"" becomes complicated in even research... no one would ever state that a woman with CAIS is ""biologically"" a male...)  As well, I understand the point of not using WP as a soap box... however in talk pages, I'm still free to assert the better application and appropriate nature of the term ""people having URAP""...   "