Agree that the two instances you added passed all tests and there is no debating the intention to slaughter. But now what Omagh; if intention is critical then there is no evidence or little suggestion that the intention was to kill civilians. Murderously careless no doubt; but not what was intended. It thus fails a key test. So in line with the two additions you've made should not remove this as I have suggested? I'd have similar reservations about the King David Hotel; that was an act of war; surely a clear case of collateral damage?