Sorry - in re-reading my edit summary I can see why you are confused - I worded it poorly.  What I meant to say was that I agreed with the IP user's deletion, because that paragraph is unsourced, appeared to be a personal account thus violating COI policy, and in any case represented an anecdote of no general interest.  So, my edit summary was meant to be a comment on the passage that had been deleted, not your restoration of it.  Should I do something to clarify?  I would not agree with restoring that deletion without some justification.