Dicdef? 

It doesn't seem to me to be a dicdef.

Its not on multiple distinct definitions of the title
it's a stub which has possibility of expansion in encyclopedic ways; it's not a dicdef just because it's currently short
plenty of other articles contain little more than a definition and some small amount of discussion, if the same standard for 'dicdef' then a large number of articles would disappear. I don't think that's what 'dicdef' means to most people.
- () Wolfkeeper (Talk)