"

 i tend to agree with the users who state that you edit unfairly and use personal attacks 

there are so many examples and many different users have posted in her complaining.  perhaps for the benefit of yourself and wikipedia you should have an admin review your actions and recommend alternative methods for you on wikipedia.

its certainly easy to find an argument on wikipedia but it shouldn't be why you come here.  for example in one of your many arguments you state ""There you go again. You see, Smee, what you just did is called passive-aggressive behavior. You're being condescending, superior, haughty, hypocritical and insulting, yet you're couching it in just the right language to still be able to say you're being ""polite"". I have merely criticized your edits and here you are still lashing out many hours later and criticizing my lack of ""tact"" in doing so. I felt really bad about upsetting you before, Smee, but the more you talk like this, the less bad I feel now. Keep talkin'.""

it seems like not only do you behave in a way that offends people.. but that you then enjoy the arguments that inevitably follow.  Did something in your current life/childhood happen that left you profoundly angry at the world?  Because that is how it looks when you talk like that.  

There simply wouldnt be so many arguments and traded insults in your talk page if you didn't have some sort of long simmering anger eating away at you.  I don't think wikipedia is the venue for dealing with it 

i am not trying to be condescending or insulting.. i hope not to offend you.. but for the sake of other's feelings (who you seem to go out of your way to offend) and the quality of articles you should attempt to compromise more instead of turning red.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs)  "