":::::Is there anything in FA-assessment that specifically requires, or even encourages, this method? ""What is good for Islam, should be good for Christianity"" makes sense, but I've never seen it explained just why it is good. I'm not sure I buy ""easier flow"", but that might be personal preference. And if people added cruft onto a glaring criticism section, that will be dealt with quickly-enough on such a high-profile article as this. But if there is a policy/guideline in assessment that prefers the integrated method, I'll be won over immediately.   

"