"

 Rollback 

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is because after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly: for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. —  

 Fantastic! Thanks! –  (talk | contrib) 

 What are you doing? 
You created a huge mess in the CFR article by deleting the paragraph that leads into the cite of the Kelleher case, which results in a horribly confusing non sequitur. (That's what was being discussed on the talk page.) Plus it sounds like you are unfamiliar with federal administrative law, in which the plain English manuals are often more important for day-to-day contact with federal agencies than the regulations or statutes (unless one is dealing directly with agency lawyers). Famous examples are the USPTO's MPEP, IRS's IRM, SSA's POMS, and the CMS Online Manual System.   

 Well then I suppose you can cite it, right? No? Can't find a reliable source for your opinions and weasel words:
 ""...must be carefully drafted in highly technical language...""
 ""Unfortunately, the vast majority of employees of the federal government are not lawyers...""
 ""...it would ask too much to force them to directly read, interpret, and apply the convoluted content of the CFR...""
 ""...very simple language that any layperson can follow...""

 I will try to repair any continuity error I caused in the article's prose. That doesn't negate my reasons for removing ""your"" unreferenced text, however. Please work with me to repair the problem, instead of name calling in edit summaries. –  (talk | contrib) 

 I.e. and e.g. 
Never? If that is the rule, then please discuss it with our Manual of Style people, so that rule will be observed more strictly than what our present guideline recommends.   

 Alright. I worded that too definitively. I think I had confused the MOS (comma may or may not be used) with what I had learned in school (no comma). Although I personally dislike redundant punctuation, I shan't edit it in the future. –  (talk | contrib) "