"

I've already accepted two versions by Hob not even mentioned by Askolnick in his two versions. The non-descriptive one and the one with ""theoretical work on psi"" or some such thing. The fact is that it is Askolnick, not me, who is rejecting anything but his own version on the basis af some spurious arguments about the fuzziness of every word in the English language except the ones he wishes to use. "