I Oppose' the move, because Tvoz' argument is more compelling than Lonely and Nasty's. I find the article readable, and it is the impression of multifaceted notability that is most compelling. I also found the summary put in by Lonely as a place-holder to be too terse and unrepresentative. It distorts the nature of the school, and I say that as a friend of one of the persons named and as a locker neighbor of another.