"

First, if you create obviously bogus claims, nobody needs to waste his time refuting the claim as applied to each excerpt you cut and paste.  One refutation is more than sufficient.  Second, your rationales appear to be shifting.  Originally you claimed that the article contained ""creative facts"" and POV statements.  Now you claim that a particular statement is unverifiable.  Be very specific about what you find problematic citing the specific Wikipedia policy.  
Given your contentious history with this article (dating back over a year) it is evident that your goal is to portray the eXile as an uncredible source.  I believe you will reject any claims that undermine this premise, regardless of their consistency with Wikipedia policy.  Consequently, if you want to be taken seriously, you need act cooperatively to resolve issues.  This means being specific in your complaints, citing the exact policy.  This means no specious claims.  And this means accepting the article as ""undisputed"" if you don't have any specific issues.  Can you abide by these conditions?   "