")
First, I'm fine with the change from ""claimed."" If memory serves this was the original language in the article, but regardless no harm intended. I've added back the bit about the updated VTP paper (with the citation needed) and clarified the authorship. That was an unintentional removal. I think the revised summary is accurate, concise and accurately covers both the facts of the situation as well as any controversy (without giving undue weight). 96.241.120.84 (talk"