"Carl_Paladino&diff;=388097440&oldid;=388080941 October 1], and again on October 2. On Linda McMahon, you have a long history of editing and edit warring on the page, and probably would have been blocked if Malinaccier hadn't protected the page on September 17; your October 1 and October 2 edits are inadvisable due to your history on that page, but I'm not really concerned with those since the things you reverted are borderline vandalism. Therefore the main motivation for the current block was your final edit to Carl Paladino.    ♦ ♣ ♠ 
I'm not sure I buy two reverts in two days as disruptive edit warring. Moreover, the combination of low speed and non-explicit warnings are concerning. Certainly, the articles in question attract people writing for differing political agendas, but I'm not aware of any specific sanctions/enforcement which apply to these articles at the moment.   
Sir - my ""history of edit warring"" was basically two years ago.  20 total edits on a page [Linda McMahon]] which another editor has over 800 edits does not seem to me to show anything near an edit war.  So I am surprised to see your rationale is the Carl Paladino page!   is a legitimate edit, and not actionable at all.  is also proper, and a day earlier.  I have a grand total of 28 edits on that page, or an average or just over an edit a day also removing clear vandalism as well).  But you blocked me without any indication of my crime, and were absent for quite a while - leaving me in limbo.  Frankly, 72 hours for a person who has no recent edit war problems seems extreme.   And for this use of block as punishment - I have doubts as to propriety thereof.  Did you block because Ohiostandard kept asserting that I was edit warring?  AFAICT, he never even posted a single diff for his charge. Thank you - now can I be unblocked so I can resume normal editing?  My radiation treatment limits my activities quite a bit.  Oh - look at this sort of ""editor"" I have had to face at ,  and a favorite example to show the kind of edits I reverted on the article.    
This looks like a bad block, and even worse when I read the explaination from the admin. Is there any ""history/involvement"" per say with the blocking admin?   
WRT asserting that Ohiostandard 'warned me"" - he never edited on the Paladino article, nor mentioned it to me. Right now the block is clearly punitive, and I respectfully request it be removed with a note that it was not ""edit war"" on my part. I do not see the point in having a clear record for nearly two years - and then being blocked for a 1RR because someone ""thinks"" I must be watched! The only connection I have with Ohiostandard is that he did not like my post about Screwball23.   
Examples of current edits from others  .  And of course the current content of "" Content of the emails in question includes video of dancing African tribesmen under the title ""Obama Inauguration Rehearsal"", a video titled ""Miss France 2008 Fucking"", an altered image of President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama dressed as a pimp and a prostitute, an image of a cargo plane landing in an African desert behind a group of panicked men titled ""Run, Niggers, Run!"" and a video portraying a woman engaged in copulation with a horse.  For some odd reason, I had thought this was actually improper on WP.  I take it that I was wrong if reverting such edits is ""edit war.""   

 precipitating edit 

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title="