":: I don't get it, why it isn't appropriate to use 1922 sources? besides my reference doesn't mention 1922 anywhere. Most of the referece in this wikipedia page don't have page number either, but anyway if you want I provide page numbers and dates aswell. With such massive evidence proven by so many anthropologist and geneticist, yet this wiki page for some reason is preventing these info which I find really suspicious.

 1)""   Lahr, M. M. , Patterns of modern human diversification: Implications for Amerindian origins. American Journal of :Physical Anthropology, ""      ""  Volume 38, Issue Supplement S2, pages 163–198, 1995

 2)""BOOK American Indian life Elsie Worthington Clews Parsons - 1991 - 419 pages - PARAGRAPH "" In race he was Mongoloid — not Chinese, Japanese, or Mongol proper, but proto-Mongoloid ; a straight-haired type, medium in :complexion, jaw protrusion, nose-breadth, and inclining probably to round-headedness; an early type, in short...""

 3) ""Archaeology: The Widening Debate By Colin Renfrew "" first colonized by proto- or pre-Mongoloid people, different from North Asian Mongoloids (Lahr 1997; Neves ct al.) Page 199""

 4)"" Genetic link between Asians and native Americans: evidence from HLA genes and haplotypes. Hum Immunol. 2001 Sep;6 ""

 5) "" Method and Theory in American Archaeology"" (Digitised online by Questia Media). Gordon Willey and Philip Phillips. University of Chicago. 1958. "" 

6)HERE ANOTHER ONE
 ""Howells, William W. (1997). Getting here: the story of human evolution. ISBN 0-929590-16-3""
This is a recreation of the craniometric dendogram entitled ""Cranial Cluster 28 Groups"" in a book by anthropologist William White Howells, professor of anthropology at Harvard University who said ""Indians"" or ""American populations"" are closest in ""studies of cranial distance"" to ""Europeans"" as seen above and that among ""Indians"" or ""American populations"", only ""Eskimos"" are ""strongly Mongoloid in form.""   4:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

"