"

Comment That's been my understanding as well. In case after case, editors argue and edit-war over subjective terms such as ""mixed"" or ""universally acclaimed"" (the later even when the ""universal"" is not 100%). None of these subjective interpretations help the reader. But if the reader sees that ""RT's aggregation says this"" and ""MC's aggregation says this"" and reads a sampling of critics' quotes beneath that, then a reader can make up his or her own mind. And we even offer the CinemaScore audience view to give them an even more well-rounded picture. We don't need to open with a claim that's subject to debate. We need to just give the facts.   "