"

Thanks for starting a section about this at the Talk page.  I further edited there to itemize the items removed.  Looking at them, I personally consider several/many of the removals to be faulty.  Just because a newspaper article that was accessed in 2011 online, has a URL that is no longer functional, does not mean that the newspaper article is not a valid reference.  It is now an offline source, or maybe has a different online URL.  It seems harsh to simply remove it.  Anyhow, thanks.  If you make future removals, could you please itemize the specific items at the Talk page for further consideration, as you go?  I'll watch here for any reply.  sincerely, ncram 

"