I see that you don't want to discuss it.  THere are sources other than Overlawyered which would probably be reliable, and a criticism section be written that isn't inflammatory and longer than the rest of the article.   When I first saw this article, I believe written by you,the whole point of it was as an attack.  This lawyer is not infamous.  He is not the target of an investigation that I know of - if he is, please cite where.  I have asked you repeatedly to just discuss, and you are unwilling to do so.  I do not have time for your games.