No attack. A question about the preceding  polarized pattern of voting and appended comments, using metaphor, and a suggestion to consider policy and practice. Your notion of what constitutes attack is interesting. Asking is not accusing-it is a way of  more politely requesting consideration of a new perception than a statement. Original research within our  debate pages  is healthy. Humour can help move a frozen debate toward consensus. 

Have you considered that your deletion of comments from other editors that you dislike on a page where you have previously expressed a vehement opinion on one side of a polarized debate may constitute a conflict of interest? 
Are you Sheriff John Brown? Am I Bob Marley?.(another metaphor)  I am glad that debate brings you merriment and keeps Qwyrxian involved. Also, why are you going around describing me as an inactive editor as you did here? []?—  Talk/Stalk