"

 That was a real speedy deletion 

I am contesting this speedy deletion because of the following reasons:

This article is not a rip-off from 2002 Gujarat violence
The main article 2002 Gujarat violence did not have extensive details/coverage on what, when and how it happened. That was the main reason for this article to be started. This article will be linked under See more section or can be included as main article for subsection that describes how the riot took place.
Since this is considered a worst violence post-Indian Independence, a detailed timeline of the riots is essential for a better understanding for the reader.

-  

Please consider adding the ""extensive details"" you planned to include in Timeline of the 2002 Gujarat riots to 2002 Gujarat riots instead. If the level of detail becomes excessive, then the need for a split might become apparent. See WP:Content forking, especially ""Point of view (POV) forks"". —  Talk/Stalk 

 The problem with editing that article is, the editors there never allow our edits to stay. If it is against Muslims, even if it had been mentioned in books, then those edits are reverted. I would have to fight a never-ending battle there. Anyhow, I will start it. It would be good, if I can get the sentences that I had typed in Timeline of the 2002 Gujarat riots. I know that a group of Wikipedians are hell-bent in accusing India of being anti-Islam and they are achieving it by the help of their own gang! -   

I've restored the page to  Talk/Stalk 

Thank you so much! -   

 The Signpost: 04 September 2013 

 Read this Signpost in full
 Single-page
 Unsubscribe
   

 G13 

You seem to have deleted an article I had just restored  but had not yet had time to remove the G13 tag, at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alex Mogilner. This seems just to have been an edit conflict, but I think it would be a good idea to always check the article history before deleting. ' ( talk ) 

I'm sorry about that. I do check the article history, but there was no indication that the article had been restored. —  Talk/Stalk 
You're right, there are frequent edit conflicts in such situations.  The database updates seem to going a little more slowly for them than for mainspace; a not unreasonable priority if it's deliberate.  Normally I just fix, but i wanted to have something on record so nobody thinks it's wheel warring. ' ( talk ) 

 Deletion of ""Lao Human Rights Council "" article ?? Why ? 

I am a new user.  I created a new article with the article contribution Wizard on September 7 entitled: ""Lao Human Rights Council""  I posted requests for help on the ""help desk"" page, to ask for help for posting on September 7, since I seemed to run in to some problems. 
Thereafter, I was suprised to find a notice of a deletion of ""Lao Human Rights Council "" article ?? Can you please tell me why ?  What did I did wrong ????  How can I fix and restore the contribution of this article ??  

I asked for help and no one from the help desk told me what I was doing wrong that would have caused a deletion of my work on the ""Lao Human Rights Council"" article.

Thank you
[[User:Publico20