Ah...so you're an administrator (maybe). Pardon me, then - you were apparently only trying to do your job. 

I was thrown off by the fact that you voted, non-neutrally and without verification for your editorial remarks. Surely an administrator doesn't want to be caught violating Wikipedia policy? I guess I'm a bit confused. 

But may I ask you a question? Have you cited anyone else for incivility? A simple yes or no would do - I'm not interested in whom else you cited. I'd just like to ascertain that you're being balanced in your assessments, that's all. You've got a very bad show going on here, a regular grabastic kangaroo court, and in no way am I the cause of it.

But I think you probably knew that already, didn't you. 

Anyway, thanks in advance for your forthcoming assurance of administrative symmetry (or maybe not...).