Much of the discussion has expired from the talk page, but in the last three months at least 4 editors have voiced support for the single paragraph intro that focuses on the definition of conspiracy theory instead of the psychology theories about conspiracy theories that operate on the assumption that CT is mental illness, which stands in stark contrast to conspiracy theories that continue to be proven correct.

If there is any question to the stability of the article, all of the recent edits were made to the proven conspiracy paragraph. There were several dozen edits due to the style of my editing. Other editors would have made the changes in only a few edits. Prior to that, the article could not be considered unstable. I am happy to retract any of the added proven conspiracy material, but ask that editors cite specific sections that are not appropriate. All of the material is comparable to the long-standing material in the section previously. It is well-sourced in its main articles and while not well-known, is not the subject of controversy.