"

Dennis, I'd really love to hear an answer as to why my Coal edits are relevant here. I've stopped editing coal, and this consitutesDouble Jeopardy since I've already been punished for this and have done nothing since then. 

Dan is also missspeaking when he says there were 4 blocks, there were 3, and one ""change of block settings"". Unless ""words no longer have meaning"" to quote that great curmudgeon Antonin Scalia, that means there were 3 blocks, not 4. And this one is somewhat strange since I seem to be getting blocked again for the same problem. Obviously my edits have improved from my first week at the encylopedia, but I keep getting unloaded on for my youthful indiscretions. Also, Flyer22 has been following me around reverting my edits since I first did her the indignity of adding a minor, brief, referenced note on Sigmund Freud's theories to her beloved childhood page, which has little to no useful philosophical material, and yet is classed as a high importance, low quality philosophy, with begging for improvement (""If you can improve this page, please do so. It has little or no material"") then afterwards, she began to follow me around to other philosophy pages, and reverting my work with dishonest comments in the edit summary given as reasons. Yes, I did get annoyed at this, but I think it was rather uncivil to tell a new editor that their edits are ""poor, pure and simple"" don't you? Especially when she doesn't seem to actually posssess any abiding interest in the topics I edit other than the fact that they are my topics, and she wishes to see me be annoyed and removed from editing this website? I'd really like a response, Dan, since I don't see how the coal quotations from prior to my previous block are germane at all here.   "