Doh!  There I go again.  I apologise.   My only excuse is that I'm a bit miffed about the checkuser request.  I'm glad that this will be a resolution to the ongoing saga, but it's still annoying that this has been caused by an editor who has himself commented that the process is unreliable and refuses to acknowledge the results.  What will it prove to him - since he will not agree with it anyway?  01:04, 1 April 2006 (UTC