"
I haven't done anything within any reasonable representation of the realms of disruption since the mass AFD noms. The subsequent accusations are more assumptions of bad faith from the accuser than actual disruption from myself (e.g. the RFC/U MFD nom was only put on MFD because of precedent). I also detest the use of CIVIL as a policy (and would much rather see it as a guideline) because policies tend to be instructional (e.g. ""you must be CIVIL""), and in this case, the application as a policy tends to make it used incorrectly (see GTBacchus' posts to the talk page) and causes more grief than it should. ''''''  "