Polaris, Wiki does not prohibit the use of POV sources, that is afterall how we get all our info anyway.  What wiki wants is to present pov material in npov fashion which means citing the source and informing readers that this is the opinion or belief of the source.  These sources have a different pov than most of the editors adding to the Che page, the pov of these people is that Che was a good man.  If we delete opposition to this we do in fact promote a pov without actually saying so.

Canderra, if you read the sources, one of them mentions that there is dispute over the battle of Santa Clara stating that it may not actually have been a battle at all but a pre-arranged surrender. Nevertheless these are reputable sources and they are NOT blogs, nor are they self published.  IRI, HNN, and FPM are not blogs, they are not self publications, they hire people to research and write and or pay scholars and journalists for their material.

In regards to Cuban economics there are multiple sources that mention the pre revolution economy and the post economy...if Milton Friedm et. al. are correct it doesnt take long to ruin an economy with communism.  Lennin managed to nearly ruin Russia in 18 months.  AT anyrate, if the claims are dubious the burdon of proof is now on you to say otherwise.  You can't just delete the information if you yourself have no cited counterpoints and no good reasons other than protecting your own POV.    (Gibby )