"

Again,  is in violation of the vandalism clause. As was predicted by the users who brought me into the discussion,  has employed his moderator lackeys to ban anyone who is critical of his vandalism.  is not above the rules of Wikipedia. It makes one wonder why he is such a proponent of not allowing anonymous users to post at Wikipedia. It's probably one's only recourse after being unjustly banned by his moderators. .   

Another moderator has abused his or her powers to ban a user who is simply inquiring about why  continually harasses users who do not share his point of view. Removing this inquiry is in itself a violation of WP:VAND. Please do not continue to remove this legitimate question.   

  

Please Stop Removing Warnings.  

Why do you continue to vandalise your own user page? Please leave user comments on this page. How can you rationalize that this inquiry is a ""personal attack""?   

 I think it is a personal attack, because you have singled out Nescio out of at least four editors who disagree with you emphatically. Nescio has shown good faith here, and your efforts to get him banned because he disagrees with you do not reflect well on your own good faith.  

In reality, quite the opposite is occuring. My efforts are focused on the goal of exposing  abuse of moderators good intentions in order to get others banned who do not share his point of view.  

Oh, and, just out of curiousity, WHY IS THIS NOT ON NESCIO'S USERPAGE?! Can someone reasonable please get it OFF the police state discussion?  

The reason why this is not on nescio's user page is because he keeps deleting it in violation of WP:VAND policy. This issue also pertains directly to this article since at least four users have been harassed and banned by Nescio's false accusations concerning this article. Ask him why he continues to delete this question about his ""edits"".   

 Actually, I'd like to ask you why you (a) persist in disruption of this page and (b) won't sign in and insist on using so many open proxy IP addresses?  

(a) This is not a ""disruption"" of this page. This discussion pertains deirectly to anyone who wishes to edit this article because if they edit in a manner that  does not agree with, they will likely be harassed and banned by Nescio and his false accusations. People should be outraged that users and/or moderators are abusing thier powers. (b) If I were to sign on under my username, it would most certainly be banned in short order. I wish to see this issue resolved for all parties involved, but I am not willing to risk my status as an editor because of Nescio's frivilous accusations.  "