"

 Indeed  Wikipedia has some serious problems 

Your comment ""There are some profound problems with Wikipedia at a systemic level"" is spot-on.  I am afraid that there are very inadequate  WP mechanisms that work reliably when it comes to fair administrative overview of controversial articles  to wit: the rationale for your block above.  

Instead, the operation of group dynamics, e.g., of one group of editors / administrators, ""sitting"" on a article using about a controversial topic (the MRM article is but one example) by using inappropriate administrative sanctions undermines the mission and reliability of WP.
Until WP can reliably address these issues, I'm afraid that some WP articles will be terribly inaccurate and/or biased.  

The downside of this, of course, is that WP is hemorrhaging editors  many of whom are highly knowledgeable professionals or academics who simply do not wish to invest their time dealing with biased wikilawyering. 

Despite this, I admire your contributions, and note your Persistence award above. Kudos  well deserved.   "