"
You can drag out the diff if you want: the disclosure is just above. Here it is for the third time: ""Oppose the move and continue to reiterate my earlier close with the consensus. The naming policy clearly states that the names Wikipedia uses for articles are those most commonly used. The MOS is subsidiary to the policy. If there are many other articles with ndash, that is not a reason to make this article also match, but a reason to rename those articles to match the common name, rather than trying to make the title look the best. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 6:54 pm, 16 March 2011, last Wednesday (4 days ago) (UTC+11)"". It's a reverse disclosure that demonstrates beyond doubt that he was conflicted when he carried out the admin action. Do you have a logical problem with this?  (talk) "