":::::: Now, would you please let me know how can someone ""dispute the relevance or accuracy of a section, then, by definition, it is controversial and disputed."" I remember when Pecher wanted to remove the disputed tags, he asked us to find a reliable source proving that the article is disputed. As much as I rememeber, you agreed with him that Jewish Encyclopedia is not enough to prove that the article is disputed. All of the editors working on this article except Pecher believe we can use JE ""usless contradicted by modern peer reviewed journal"". Would you please let us know how can one dispute the material from JE. Thanks.  

 I also agree with you that it's best to use modern sources. If any of us finds one such source and observes that there is a contradiction, it will establish that Jewish Encyclopedia (JE) is outdated. Still, it is hard for me to believe that JE gets greatly outdated on something that has happened many centuries before.  

"