"
I have also added the Kingdom of the Gepids. It is interesting that you have only removed the Hunnic Empire, the Principality of Hungary and the Kingdom of Hungary. Are you ""cherry-picking"" what you dislike and discard them? I do not agree with your approach that only those states/provinces should be mentined that ""were centered in Banat or had sizable part of their territory located in Banat"". What's the argument behind that?  What do you mean by ""sizable part""? How could it be that the province of Roman Dacia satisfies this ""sizable part"" criterion, but the Principality of Hungary does not. For the sake of neutrality, we should provide the list of all entities (with time periods) which contained the area of the Banat of Temeswar. If we know the name of the sub-part (province, eyalet, etc.) then it is even better, but even if we do not know it we should mention the entity (kingdom, empire, etc). to which the territory belonged.  {ταλκ} "