"

Good lord. I mentioned the clusterfucked bureaucracy but I did not anticipate your adherence to it. You deleted my post and it was regarded as ""vandalism"" when I tried to repost it. One of the editors which removed my information was on trial for being a bot. I'm not sure what ""edit war"" you are referring to, other than my own additions to your page, which you state at the top that you welcome. Your immediate removal of my edit was very suspicious to me, as it seemed pretty authoritative. Are you on the edits to Marmaduke subscription list? I don't understand. I do not think I am acting like a child. If childish behavior to you is using bad language, then call me a a child I suppose. I did not call you any personal names and only referred to what I thought of as a hierarchy on Wikipedia as a ""clusterfucked bureaucracy."" I can call your edits an ego trip, which they increasingly seem to be, as you want to talk to me like I am a child, even calling me ""childish"". It seems as if you didn't even consider the several links I included in my last post, inculding NPR. I am trying to tell you that I made a reasonable edit to a page, one that I made before and which lasted several months before I noticed it was gone tonight. You assertion that ""I am willing to bet no one will show you more sympathy than I will"" is further proof that this process is an ego trip for you. If users are all equal, than I would prefer it if you left me alone. My edit is not inflammatory, and included a link to the website. If needs be, I can include all of the links I provided on your page if that is enough to validate my claim that marmaduke explained is a relatively popular blog. If all users are equal, then why does your designation of my writing as ""non-notable"" brand me with vandalism when I attempt to re-post the content? Please explain yourself.

Thanks,

yournumbertwofan"