"

Well, I said I am flexible, but I think you are way out of line with the article. For a long time the article stood on its legs because I, as Entwistle's biographer (the book is on its way), VERIFIED the sources. For example (and I'm only going to give two for now), you deleted the entry mentioning her signing the RKO contract on June 13....I HAVE THE CONTRACT IN FRONT OF ME! I'd be happy to send you a scan of it. At the top it says, ""This agreement made this 13th Day of June, 1932, between RKO Studios and Peg Entwistle."" It is signed by Entwistle, David O. Selznick, and Daniel L. Oshea, Selnick's Assistant Secretary. Then you added that Entwistle played in bit parts in several films (I'm paraphrasing), and referenced a source. But this claim of bit parts in other films proved to be untrue when I researched the entire body of RKO's inter-office memos at the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences archives in the Herrick Library in Beverly Hills. (I have copies of all the Selznick and Cukor memos regarding ""Thirteen Women,"" and other possible Peg Entwistle-related projects (such as discussions regarding Billie Burke wanting Peg instead of Katherine Hepburn in ""Bill of Divorcement."" (Would you like to see them, too?)

I can go on and on with your deletionswhich, in my opinion, have a somewhat thinly-veiled personal bent. Clearly, you have no idea what you are talking about with regard to much of what you ""tweaked."" I understand editing for flow and NPOV, but your scalpel became a chainsaw to an article, though far from perfect, was quite acceptable to long-time Wiki editors and other administrators.
I tried to be polite and respectful and reasonable, but it turns out that you are entirely unwilling to discuss anything with regard my expertise into the career and life and death of Peg Entwistle before ""tweaking"" her Wiki.

Entwistle's familynamely her brother Milton Entwistle and his daughterfurnished me with hundreds of documents including diaries, letters, and telegrams. Before I met them I spent 5 years researching her careerliterally reading the era's newspapers and theatrical-related periodicals a page at a time. I spent hundreds of hours doing interviews. I found Entwistle doing radio in 1925, having lunch at the White House in 1931, being black mailed, and a dozen other things no onenot even her family had known. And because of her family's cooperation, I was able to complete a timeline that other authors had never before been able to string together. EVERYTHING I discovered has at least two verifiable, reliable sources.

Wiki editors Rossrs, and Wildhartlivie, and I spent weeks ""tweaking"" the  Entwistle articleit wasn't perfect, but it was good enough for them and so it remained good enough for Wikipedia until you came along and decided you knew more about her than her biographer. How ironic that a Wikipedia Administrator, in trying to establish a foothold of ""one-up-menship"" into a long-accepted Wikipedia article, actually deleted facts and added untruthsI'm sure you're quite satisfied with yourself.  "