It's not bad at all. Subheadings make it more reader friendly - IMO. (I divided this talk into a new heading fors same reason) The reference for cash for fatwas [Times of India] does indeed not mention the Deoband, although they could still be linked as Deobandis are also attached more broader to general sunni Muslim associations and networks, but as it doesn't mention it specifically, we probably should not use it. However, a different reference contains more details, which I will add i.e. Hindustan Times.