"
No worries here against re-adding it—I understand where you're coming from. I suppose it's more-or-less common sense to me that it's impossible to give someone a ""warning to stop"" vandalism if they are not ""active now"" with vandalism. To give somebody a warning for example to ""stop eating"" makes little sense if they are not currently eating. Thus, the so-called ""warning"" is not actually a warning at all because there is no logic to hold it together. Just now however I realize that this is probably quite beyond 'common' sense so I would have no issue if you re-add that bit.  · talk "