Good to read your reply.  I re-checked the talk pages I mentioned above, and most of the editors posting there are seemingly aligned with RL and RR, also mentioned above.  Their edits are unconstructive and unproductive, and I don't think they're truly well-intentioned.  The coalescing group I described are honorable and well-intentioned and are lead by editor Junebug52; check out his talk page and you'll see the others posting encouragement and offers of help.  Also, if you have a chance, check out the recent addition to Valid Criteria under WP:PORNBIO, #6; it seems to say that if a porn actor is not notable as a porn actor, but is notable outside of porn, then he warrants a article as a porn actor  I think it's absurd.  Enjoy the rest of your break.  Talk to you soon.