"
  Yes, of course, I had it and it is still there. What is your point regarding it?  That is asking Hindus to come forward and themselves also actually define what a Hindu is. How did you construe that to be a ""Hindu Sikh battleground"" is beyond any comprehension (""no mention of Sikh at all""). I do understand that Wikipedia is not a forum to have this debate (which I myself agreed to, and did not pursue it further). However, coincidentally, you yourself have started a debate there now on ""Hindus' definition of Hindu"".   "