"

 Devante Cole 

Hi I noticed you reverted my removal of the manchester city first team navbox from the Devante Cole article. The reason I removed it is he is not a member of the first team and not listed in the navbox so the navbox should not be on his page. I also removed it from several other players pages and included a transclusion check link and source on the template page. Do you think I'm wrong? I was just doing some article maintenance. Thanks  Bradbury 

 Edit summaries 

Hi, could you please remove some edit summaries at 2015–16 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round. An angry IP used some not very appropriate words.  (talk) 
Thanks for hiding the edit summaries, now he has started making bad edits the talkpage for the same article so could you please hide those revisions also. It is the same editor as before on the article with a dynamic IP including
 (blocked yesterday)

so do you think it is time to ask for a range block?  (talk) 
Okay, thank you.  (talk) 
  
 The most recnt IP today, 109.98.160.129, has not been blocked.  (talk) 
  . Snowman 

 FC Spartaki Tskhinvali 

From what I can see, FC Spartaki Tskhinvali has been renamed to only 'FC Tskhinvali' (in January 2015 according to the article). They have a new logo in the article and are known as 'FC Tskhinvali' at Soccerway while UEFA has them only as 'Tskhinvali' (for some reason they dont use FC for only that team?). Their own webpage http://www.fcspartak.ge/ seems to support 'FC Tskhinvali'. I can not move the page, admin is needed. Do you think we should move it and if so, can you do it?  (talk) 
Done, see this RM.  (talk) 

 Jake Speight 

GiantSnowman I am a web designer and work for one of the subjects companies and know 100% facts of his career and personal life. I am however new to editing and apologies for any offence caused. If he is in fact not regsitered with the FA as a player with any club and why is it not possible to delete the things that are not facts(just asking) also he is registered with the FA as an agent as you was previously told by another user this is fact. I would never edit anything that could be proved as fact. again sorry if we got off on the wrong foot mainly my fault now i understand the rules more and that i have to go through you to edit i will do from nowXVXI (talk)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) 08