Yep he is the same, I'm not going to argue whether his experience in testing theories of other fringe science fields makes him more, or less credible, as there is no notable source for this as of yet. All I wanted to point out is that the lugano 2014 report is making waves in a way that the 2013 report did not. As per the notability rules, does that not indicate that the 2014 report should be included either in addition to, or at the excision of the 2013 report? As far as I am concerned, either we need to include the 2014 report or not mention either of them, as it gives a false impression that nothing has occurred in the intervening time. we could also drop the 2013 report in favour of the 2014 one, as it is more rigorous and in any case answers the same and many more questions.