"

 have edited, deleted, and added to hundreds of wikipedia pages in the past and never had this problem. You obviously feel like you own this article, and I am willing to compromise this section if you are. This video of him at Stanford is not just on youtube. You can search for it on google and find it on many different sites. I don't know who made you the deciding factor of this arcticle on what is and what is not a reliable source. You cannot classify a this, as wikipedia is a page that anyone can edit. If I was completely vandalising the page that would be one thing, but all I did was take out 4 words of a paragraph. I don't know why you feel the need to replace it every time, as the whole paragraph has nothing to do with really anything. You say that it is not a good idea to do this, but obviously not too many people care about this except you. I want to delete the entire paragraph, but if that is considered ""wrong"" then I feel I have a right to put in something that he said in front of a live audience. It does not matter what site it comes from, as long as he said it. (just like the comment about atheism, which he said in anger one time) I mean there are hundreds of sites that say he is quitting smoking marijuana, so he is obviously for the legalization of it, not to mention he flat out says ""I am for the legalization of marijuana"" in the video which is on many sites which could be classified as a ""reliable source."""