OpenRaiser/Intern-Atlas huggingface dataset:
From Entity-Centric to Goal-Oriented Graphs: Enhancing LLM Knowledge Retrieval in Minecraft
Venue: arXiv cs.AI 2026
Year: 2026

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive general capabilities but often struggle with step-by-step procedural reasoning, a critical challenge in complex interactive environments. While retrieval-augmented methods like GraphRAG attempt to bridge this gap, their fragmented entity-relation graphs hinder the construction of coherent, multi-step plans. In this paper, we propose a novel framework based on Goal-Oriented Graphs (GoGs), where each node represents a goal and edges encode logical dependencies between them. This structure enables the explicit retrieval of causal reasoning paths by identifying a high-level goal and recursively retrieving its prerequisites, forming a coherent chain to guide the LLM. Through extensive experiments on the Minecraft testbed, a domain that demands robust multi-step planning and provides rich procedural knowledge, we demonstrate that GoG substantially improves procedural reasoning and significantly outperforms GraphRAG and other state-of-the-art baselines.
Personalized Safety in LLMs: A Benchmark and A Planning-Based Agent Approach
Venue: arXiv cs.CY 2026
Year: 2026

Large language models (LLMs) typically generate identical or similar responses for all users given the same prompt, posing serious safety risks in high-stakes applications where user vulnerabilities differ widely. Existing safety evaluations primarily rely on context-independent metrics - such as factuality, bias, or toxicity - overlooking the fact that the same response may carry divergent risks depending on the user's background or condition. We introduce personalized safety to fill this gap and present PENGUIN - a benchmark comprising 14,000 scenarios across seven sensitive domains with both context-rich and context-free variants. Evaluating six leading LLMs, we demonstrate that personalized user information significantly improves safety scores by 43.2%, confirming the effectiveness of personalization in safety alignment. However, not all context attributes contribute equally to safety enhancement. To address this, we develop RAISE - a training-free, two-stage agent framework that strategically acquires user-specific background. RAISE improves safety scores by up to 31.6% over six vanilla LLMs, while maintaining a low interaction cost of just 2.7 user queries on average. Our findings highlight the importance of selective information gathering in safety-critical domains and offer a practical solution for personalizing LLM responses without model retraining. This work establishes a foundation for safety research that adapts to individual user contexts rather than assuming a universal harm standard.
Language Models Should be Used to Surface the Unwritten Code of Science and Society
Venue: arXiv cs.CY 2026
Year: 2026

This paper calls on the research community not only to investigate how human biases are inherited by large language models (LLMs) but also to explore how these biases in LLMs can be leveraged to make society's "unwritten code" - such as implicit stereotypes and heuristics - visible and accessible for critique. We introduce a conceptual framework through a case study in science: uncovering hidden rules in peer review - the factors that reviewers care about but rarely state explicitly due to normative scientific expectations. The idea of the framework is to push LLMs to speak out their heuristics through generating self-consistent hypotheses - why one paper appeared stronger in reviewer scoring - among paired papers submitted to 46 academic conferences, while iteratively searching deeper hypotheses from remaining pairs where existing hypotheses cannot explain. We observed that LLMs' normative priors about the internal characteristics of good science extracted from their self-talk, e.g., theoretical rigor, were systematically updated toward posteriors that emphasize storytelling about external connections, such as how the work is positioned and connected within and across literatures. Human reviewers tend to explicitly reward aspects that moderately align with LLMs' normative priors (correlation = 0.49) but avoid articulating contextualization and storytelling posteriors in their review comments (correlation = -0.14), despite giving implicit reward to them with positive scores. These patterns are robust across different models and out-of-sample judgments. We discuss the broad applicability of our proposed framework, leveraging LLMs as diagnostic tools to amplify and surface the tacit codes underlying human society, enabling public discussion of revealed values and more precisely targeted responsible AI.
Recalibrating binary probabilistic classifiers
Venue: arXiv cs.LG 2026
Year: 2026

Recalibration of binary probabilistic classifiers to a target prior probability is an important task in areas like credit risk management. However, recalibration of a classifier learned on a training dataset to a target on a test dataset in general is not a well-defined problem because there might be more than one way to transform the original posterior probabilities such that the target is matched. In this paper, methods for recalibration are analysed from a distribution shift perspective. Distribution shift assumptions linked to the area under the curve (AUC) of a probabilistic classifier are found to be useful for the design of meaningful recalibration methods. Two new methods called parametric covariate shift with posterior drift (CSPD) and ROC-based quasi moment matching (QMM) are proposed and tested together with some other methods in an example setting. The outcomes of the test suggest that the QMM methods discussed in the paper can provide appropriately conservative results in evaluations with concave functions like for instance risk weights functions for credit risk.
LLLMs: A Data-Driven Survey of Evolving Research on Limitations of Large Language Models
Venue: arXiv cs.CL 2026
Year: 2026

Large language model (LLM) research has grown rapidly, along with increasing concern about their limitations. In this survey, we conduct a data-driven, semi-automated review of research on limitations of LLMs (LLLMs) from 2022 to early 2025 using a bottom-up approach. From a corpus of 250,000 ACL and arXiv papers, we identify 14,648 relevant papers using keyword filtering, LLM-based classification, validated against expert labels, and topic clustering (via two approaches, HDBSCAN+BERTopic and LlooM). We find that the share of LLM-related papers increases over fivefold in ACL and nearly eightfold in arXiv between 2022 and 2025. Since 2022, LLLMs research grows even faster, reaching over 30% of LLM papers by 2025. Reasoning remains the most studied limitation, followed by generalization, hallucination, bias, and security. The distribution of topics in the ACL dataset stays relatively stable over time, while arXiv shifts toward security risks, alignment, hallucinations, knowledge editing, and multimodality. We offer a quantitative view of trends in LLLMs research and release a dataset of annotated abstracts and a validated methodology, available at: https://github.com/a-kostikova/LLLMs-Survey.
Consistency-based Abductive Reasoning over Perceptual Errors of Multiple Pre-trained Models in Novel Environments
Venue: arXiv cs.AI 2026
Year: 2026

The deployment of pre-trained perception models in novel environments often leads to performance degradation due to distributional shifts. Although recent artificial intelligence approaches for metacognition use logical rules to characterize and filter model errors, improving precision often comes at the cost of reduced recall. This paper addresses the hypothesis that leveraging multiple pre-trained models can mitigate this recall reduction. We formulate the challenge of identifying and managing conflicting predictions from various models as a consistency-based abduction problem, building on the idea of abductive learning (ABL) but applying it to test-time instead of training. The input predictions and the learned error detection rules derived from each model are encoded in a logic program. We then seek an abductive explanation--a subset of model predictions--that maximizes prediction coverage while ensuring the rate of logical inconsistencies (derived from domain constraints) remains below a specified threshold. We propose two algorithms for this knowledge representation task: an exact method based on Integer Programming (IP) and an efficient Heuristic Search (HS). Through extensive experiments on a simulated aerial imagery dataset featuring controlled, complex distributional shifts, we demonstrate that our abduction-based framework outperforms individual models and standard ensemble baselines, achieving, for instance, average relative improvements of approximately 13.6\% in F1-score and 16.6\% in accuracy across 15 diverse test datasets when compared to the best individual model. Our results validate the use of consistency-based abduction as an effective mechanism to robustly integrate knowledge from multiple imperfect models in challenging, novel scenarios.
Toward Multiphysics-Informed Machine Learning for Sustainable Data Center Operations: Intelligence Evolution with Deployable Solutions for Computing Infrastructure
Venue: arXiv cs.AI 2026
Year: 2026

The revolution in artificial intelligence (AI) has brought sustainable challenges in data center management due to the high carbon emissions and short cooling response time associated with high-power density racks. While machine learning (ML) offers promise for intelligent management, its adoption is hindered by safety and reliability concerns. To address this, we propose a multiphysics-informed machine learning (MPIML) framework that integrates physical priors into data-driven models for enhanced accuracy and safety. We introduce an integrated system architecture comprising three core engines: DCLib for versatile facility modeling, DCTwin for high-fidelity multiphysics simulation, and DCBrain for decision-making optimization. This system enables critical predictive and prescriptive applications, such as carbon-aware IT provisioning, safety-aware intelligent cooling control and battery health forecasting. An illustrative example on an industry-grade data center cooling control demonstrates that our MPIML approach reduces annual carbon emissions up to 200 kilotons compared with conventional methods while ensuring operational constraints are met. We conclude by outlining key challenges and future directions for developing autonomous and sustainable data centers.
Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems
Venue: arXiv cs.HC 2026
Year: 2026

Recommender systems (RS), which are widely deployed across high-stakes domains, are susceptible to biases that can cause large-scale societal impacts. Researchers have proposed methods to measure and mitigate such biases - but translating academic theory into practice is inherently challenging. Through a semi-structured interview study (N=11), we map the RS practitioner workflow within large technology companies, focusing on how technical teams consider fairness internally and in collaboration with legal, data, and fairness teams. We identify key challenges to incorporating fairness into existing RS workflows: defining fairness in RS contexts, balancing multi-stakeholder interests, and navigating dynamic environments. We also identify key organization-wide challenges: making time for fairness work and facilitating cross-team communication. Finally, we offer actionable recommendations for the RS community, including practitioners and HCI researchers.
Learning for Dynamic Combinatorial Optimization without Training Data
Venue: arXiv cs.LG 2026
Year: 2026

We introduce DyCO-GNN, a novel unsupervised learning framework for Dynamic Combinatorial Optimization that requires no training data beyond the problem instance itself. DyCO-GNN leverages structural similarities across time-evolving graph snapshots to accelerate optimization while maintaining solution quality. We evaluate DyCO-GNN on dynamic maximum cut, maximum independent set, and the traveling salesman problem across diverse datasets of varying sizes, demonstrating its superior performance under tight and moderate time budgets. DyCO-GNN consistently outperforms the baseline methods, achieving high-quality solutions up to 3-60x faster, highlighting its practical effectiveness in rapidly evolving resource-constrained settings.
PAM: Training Policy-Aligned Moderation Filters at Scale
Venue: arXiv cs.CL 2026
Year: 2026

Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to misalignment and jailbreaks, making external safeguards like moderation filters essential, yet existing filters often focus narrowly on safety, falling short of the broader alignment needs seen in real-world deployments. We introduce Policy Aligned Moderation (PAM), a flexible framework for training custom moderation filters grounded in user-defined policies that extend beyond conventional safety objectives. PAM automates training data generation without relying on human-written examples, enabling scalable support for diverse, application-specific alignment goals and generation policies. PAM-trained filters match the performance of state-of-the-art safety moderation filters and policy reasoning models, and outperform them on PAMbench, four newly introduced user-annotated policy enforcement benchmarks that target age restrictions, dietary accommodations, cultural alignment, and limitations in medical guidance. These performance gains are achieved while the PAM filter runs 5-100x faster at inference than policy-conditioned reasoning models.
Understanding the Performance Gap in Preference Learning: A Dichotomy of RLHF and DPO
Venue: arXiv cs.LG 2026
Year: 2026

We present a fine-grained theoretical analysis of the performance gap between reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and direct preference optimization (DPO) under a representation gap. Our study decomposes this gap into two sources: an explicit representation gap under exact optimization and an implicit representation gap under finite samples. In the exact optimization setting, we characterize how the relative capacities of the reward and policy model classes influence the final policy qualities. We show that RLHF, DPO, or online DPO can outperform one another depending on type of model mis-specifications. Notably, online DPO can outperform both RLHF and standard DPO when the reward and policy model classes are isomorphic and both mis-specified. In the approximate optimization setting, we provide a concrete construction where the ground-truth reward is implicitly sparse and show that RLHF requires significantly fewer samples than DPO to recover an effective reward model, highlighting a statistical advantage of two-stage learning. Together, these results provide a comprehensive understanding of the performance gap between RLHF and DPO under various settings, and offer practical insights into when each method is preferred.
From Few to Many Faults: Optimal Adaptive Byzantine Agreement
Venue: arXiv cs.DC 2026
Year: 2026

Achieving agreement among distributed parties is a fundamental task in modern systems, underpinning applications such as consensus in blockchains, coordination in cloud infrastructure, and fault tolerance in critical services. However, this task can be intensive, often requiring a large number of messages to be exchanged as well as many rounds of communication, especially in the presence of Byzantine faults. This makes efficiency a central challenge in the design of practical agreement protocols. In this paper, we study the problem of Binary Agreement and give protocols that are simultaneously optimal in both message and round complexity, parameterized by the actual number of Byzantine faults. In contrast to previous works, we demonstrate that optimal message complexity can be achieved without sacrificing latency. Concretely, for a system of $n$ parties tolerating up to $t$ Byzantine faults, out of which only $f \leq t$ are actually faulty, we give the following results: When $t = Ω(n)$, in the synchronous (resp. partially synchronous) setting, with optimal resiliency $t < n/2$ (resp. $t < n/3$), we describe a deterministic protocol with optimal communication complexity $O(n \cdot (f+1))$ and optimal round complexity $O(f + 1)$. Building upon this previous result, when $t = o(n)$, for both the synchronous and partially synchronous setting, we describe a deterministic protocol with near-optimal communication complexity $\widetilde{O}(n + t\cdot f)$ and near-optimal round complexity $\widetilde{O}(f+1)$. Our approach relies on a novel use of dispersers to efficiently disseminate a value. For the asynchronous setting, we show a $Ω(n + t^2)$ lower bound in expectation and provide a randomized protocol with near-optimal $\widetilde{O}(n + t^2)$ communication complexity and $O(1)$ round complexity in expectation.
Explanation User Interfaces: A Systematic Literature Review
Venue: arXiv cs.HC 2026
Year: 2026

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the major technological advancements of this century, bearing incredible potential for users through AI-powered applications and tools in numerous domains. Being often black-box (i.e., its decision-making process is unintelligible), developers typically resort to eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques to interpret the behaviour of AI models to produce systems that are transparent, fair, reliable, and trustworthy. However, presenting explanations to the user is not trivial and is often left as a secondary aspect of the system's design process, leading to AI systems that are not useful to end-users. This paper presents a Systematic Literature Review on Explanation User Interfaces (XUIs) to gain a deeper understanding of the solutions and design guidelines employed in the academic literature to effectively present explanations to users. To improve the contribution and real-world impact of this survey, we also present a platform to support Human-cEnteRed developMent of Explainable user interfaceS (HERMES) and guide practitioners and scholars in the design and evaluation of XUIs.
ePC: Fast and Deep Predictive Coding for Digital Hardware
Venue: arXiv cs.LG 2026
Year: 2026

Predictive Coding (PC) offers a brain-inspired alternative to backpropagation for neural network training, described as a physical system minimizing its internal energy. However, in practice, PC is predominantly digitally simulated, requiring excessive amounts of compute while struggling to scale to deeper architectures. This paper reformulates PC to overcome this hardware-algorithm mismatch. First, we uncover how the canonical state-based formulation of PC (sPC) is, by design, deeply inefficient in digital simulation, inevitably resulting in exponential signal decay that stalls the entire minimization process. Then, to overcome this fundamental limitation, we introduce error-based PC (ePC), a novel reparameterization of PC which does not suffer from signal decay. Though no longer biologically plausible, ePC numerically computes exact PC weights gradients and runs orders of magnitude faster than sPC. Experiments across multiple architectures and datasets demonstrate that ePC matches backpropagation's performance even for deeper models where sPC struggles. Besides practical improvements, our work provides theoretical insight into PC dynamics and establishes a foundation for scaling PC-based learning to deeper architectures on digital hardware and beyond.
Towards the Automated Extraction and Refactoring of NoSQL Schemas from Application Code
Venue: arXiv cs.DB 2026
Year: 2026

In this paper, we present a static code analysis strategy to extract logical schemas from NoSQL applications. Our solution is based on a model-driven reverse engineering process composed of a chain of platform-independent model transformations. The extracted schema conforms to the U-Schema unified metamodel, which can represent both NoSQL and relational schemas. To support this process, we define a metamodel capable of representing the core elements of object-oriented languages. Application code is first injected into a code model, from which a control flow model is derived. This, in turn, enables the generation of a model representing both data access operations and the structure of stored data. From these models, the U-Schema logical schema is inferred. Additionally, the extracted information can be used to identify refactoring opportunities. We illustrate this capability through the detection of join-like query patterns and the automated application of field duplication strategies to eliminate expensive joins. All stages of the process are described in detail, and the approach is validated through a round-trip experiment in which a application using a MongoDB store is automatically generated from a predefined schema. The inferred schema is then compared to the original to assess the accuracy of the extraction process.
Ground-R1: Incentivizing Grounded Visual Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning
Venue: arXiv cs.CV 2026
Year: 2026

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have become powerful general-purpose assistants, yet their predictions often lack reliability and interpretability due to insufficient grounding in visual evidence. The emerging thinking-with-images paradigm seeks to address this issue by explicitly anchoring reasoning to image regions. However, we empirically find that most existing methods suffer from a systematic scale-driven bias in optimization, where training rewards are dominated by large visual regions, suppressing learning from small but semantically critical evidence and leading to spurious grounding at inference time. To address this limitation, we propose Ground-R1, a de-biased thinking-with-images framework trained via a novel Scale Relative Policy Optimization (SRPO) objective that replaces standard GRPO. Specifically, our SRPO recalibrates reward learning across evidence regions of different sizes through scale-aware binning and intra-/inter-bin comparisons, enabling balanced credit assignment during training. Experimental results on general LVLM, high-resolution, and visual grounding benchmarks validate the effectiveness of Ground-R1 and show that SRPO yields consistent gains over standard GRPO in both response accuracy and evidence grounding.
OccLE: Label-Efficient 3D Semantic Occupancy Prediction
Venue: arXiv cs.CV 2026
Year: 2026

3D semantic occupancy prediction offers an intuitive and efficient scene understanding and has attracted significant interest in autonomous driving perception. Existing approaches either rely on full supervision, which demands costly voxel-level annotations, or on self-supervision, which provides limited guidance and yields suboptimal performance. To address these challenges, we propose OccLE, a Label-Efficient 3D Semantic Occupancy Prediction that takes images and LiDAR as inputs and maintains high performance with limited voxel annotations. Our intuition is to decouple the semantic and geometric learning tasks and then fuse the learned feature grids from both tasks for the final semantic occupancy prediction. Therefore, the semantic branch distills 2D foundation model to provide aligned pseudo labels for 2D and 3D semantic learning. The geometric branch integrates image and LiDAR inputs in cross-plane synergy based on their inherency, employing semi-supervision to enhance geometry learning. We fuse semantic-geometric feature grids through Dual Mamba and incorporate a scatter-accumulated projection to supervise unannotated prediction with aligned pseudo labels. Experiments show that OccLE achieves competitive performance with only 10\% of voxel annotations on the SemanticKITTI and Occ3D-nuScenes datasets. The code will be publicly released on https://github.com/NerdFNY/OccLE