OpenMed/multicare-articles huggingface dataset:
The benefits of sensation on the experience of a hand: A qualitative case series
Authors: Emily L Graczyk, Anisha Gill, Dustin J Tyler, Linda J Resnik
Journal: PLoS One (2019)
MeSH terms: Amputees / psychology, Artificial Limbs / psychology, Feedback, Sensory / physiology, Hand / physiology, Patient Satisfaction, Sensation / physiology, Upper Extremity / physiology, Case Reports, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S., Electrodes, Implanted, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life

Background:
The experience of upper limb loss involves loss of both functional capabilities and the sensory connection of a hand. Research studies to restore sensation to persons with upper limb loss with neural interfaces typically measure outcomes through standardized functional tests or quantitative surveys. However, these types of metrics cannot fully capture the personal experience of living with limb loss or the impact of sensory restoration on this experience. Qualitative studies can demonstrate the viewpoints and priorities of specific persons or groups and reveal the underlying conceptual structure of various aspects of their experiences.
Methods and findings:
Following a home use trial of a neural-connected, sensory-enabled prosthesis, two persons with upper limb loss were interviewed about their experiences using the sensory restoration system in unsupervised, unconstrained settings. We used grounded theory methodology to examine their experiences, perspectives, and opinions about the sensory restoration system. We then developed a model to describe the impact of sensation on the experience of a hand for persons with upper limb loss.
Conclusions:
The experience of sensation was complex and included concepts such as the naturalness of the experience, sensation modality, and the usefulness of the sensory information. Sensation was critical for outcome acceptance, and contributed to prosthesis embodiment, confidence, reduced focus and attention for using the prosthesis, and social interactions. Embodiment, confidence, and social interactions were also key determinants of outcome acceptance. This model provides a unified framework to study and understand the impact of sensation on the experience of limb loss and to understand outcome acceptance following upper limb loss more broadly.