# Complex Analysics/Maximum Principle
## Introduction

The maximum principle is a statement about holomorphic functions from the Complex Analysis. The magnitude $|f|$ of a holomorphic function $f:G\to \mathbb {C}$ cannot attain any strict local maxima within the domain of definition. Specifically, it asserts the following statement.

## Statement

Let $U\subseteq \mathbb {C}$ be a domain, and let $f:U\to \mathbb {C}$ be holomorphic. If $|f|$ has a local maximum in $U$, then $f$ is constant. If $U$ is bounded and $f$ can be continuously extended to ${\bar {U}}$, then $f$ attains its maximum on $\partial U$.
To prove this, we require a lemma that locally implies the conclusion.

### Lemma

Let $G\subseteq \mathbb {C}$ be open, and $f:G\to \mathbb {C}$ be holomorphic. Let $z_{0}\in G$ be a local maximum point of $|f|$. Then $f$ is constant in a neighborhood of $z_{0}$.

## Proof of Lemma 1

Let $r>0$ be chosen such that $|f(z)|\leq |f(z_{0})|$ for all $z\in {\bar {D}}r(z_{0})\subseteq G$. The Cauchy's integral formula'gives, for all $\varepsilon \leq r$:
    $f(z_{0})={\frac {1}{2\pi i}}\int {\partial D_{\varepsilon }(z_{0})}{\frac {f(z)}{z-z_{0}}},dz$
This allows us to establish the following estimation:

## Proof of Lemma 2

We derive the following estimation:
    ${\begin{array}{rl}|f(z_{0})|&={\frac {1}{2\pi }}\left|\int _{\partial D_{\varepsilon }(z_{0})}{\frac {f(z)}{z-z_{0}}}\,dz\right|\\&={\frac {1}{2\pi }}\left|\int _{0}^{2\pi }{\frac {f(z_{0}+\varepsilon e^{it})}{\varepsilon \cdot e^{it}}}\varepsilon \cdot i\cdot e^{it}\,dt\right|\\&\leq {\frac {1}{2\pi }}\int _{0}^{2\pi }|f(z_{0}+\varepsilon \cdot e^{it})|\,dt\\&\leq \sup _{t\in [0,2\pi ]}|f(z_{0}+\varepsilon \cdot e^{it})|\\&\leq |f(z_{0})|\end{array}}$

## Proof of Lemma 3

It follows that the inequality $\leq$ must be an equality chain, implying
    ${\begin{array}{rl}|f(z_{0})|=&\int _{0}^{2\pi }|f(z_{0})|\cdot {\frac {1}{2\pi }}dt={\frac {1}{2\pi }}\int _{0}^{2\pi }|f(z_{0}+\varepsilon \cdot e^{it})|\,dt\\\Rightarrow &0=\int _{0}^{2\pi }(|f(z)|-|f(z_{0})|)dt\\\Rightarrow &|f(z)|=|f(z_{0})|\end{array}}$.

### Proof of Lemma 4

Thus, we establish the constancy of $|f|$ using the property:
    $|f(z)|=|f(z_{0})|$ for all $z\in {\bar {D}}_{r}(z_{0})$,
i.e., $|f|$ is constant on $D_{r}(z_{0})$.

### Proof of Lemma 5

If $|f|={\sqrt {{\mathfrak {Re}}(f)^{2}+{\mathfrak {Im}}(f)^{2}}}$ is constant on $D_{r}(z_{0})$, then ${\mathfrak {Re}}(f)^{2}+{\mathfrak {Im}}(f)^{2}=c$ must also be constant, where $c\in \mathbb {R}$ is a constant.

### Proof of Lemma 6

Since $f$ is holomorphic on $D_{r}(z_{0})$, the Cauchy-Riemann-Differential equation'apply:
    $u:={\mathfrak {Re}}(f),\ v:={\mathfrak {Im}}(f),\ {\text{and}}\ f(z):=u(x,y)+i\cdot v(x,y)$,
and the following holds:
    ${\frac {\partial u(x,y)^{2}+v(x,y)^{2}}{\partial x}}=0\ {\text{and}}\ {\frac {\partial u(x,y)^{2}+v(x,y)^{2}}{\partial y}}=0$.

### Proof of Lemma 7

Let $u_{x}={\frac {\partial u}{\partial x}}$ and $u_{y}={\frac {\partial u}{\partial y}}$. Applying the chain rule to the partial derivatives, we obtain:
    $0=2uu_{x}+2vv_{x}$ and $0=2uu_{y}+2vv_{y}$.
Using the Cauchy-Riemann-Differential equation', replace the partial derivatives of $v$ with those of $u$:
    $u_{x}=v_{y}$ and $u_{y}=-v_{x}$, leading to:
    $0=2\cdot (uu_{x}-vu_{y})$ and $0=2\cdot (uu_{y}+vu_{x})$.

### Proof of Lemma 8

Squaring the above equations yields:
    $0=(uu_{x}-vu_{y})^{2}=u^{2}u_{x}^{2}-2uu_{x}\cdot vu_{y}+v^{2}u_{y}^{2}$,
    $0=(uu_{y}+vu_{x})^{2}=u^{2}u_{y}^{2}+2uu_{y}\cdot vu_{x}+v^{2}u_{x}^{2}$.
Adding these equations gives:
    $0=u^{2}u_{x}^{2}+v^{2}u_{y}^{2}+u^{2}u_{y}^{2}+v^{2}u_{x}^{2}$.

### Proof of Lemma 9

Factoring out $u^{2}$ and $v^{2}$:
    $0=u^{2}(u_{x}^{2}+u_{y}^{2})+v^{2}(u_{x}^{2}+u_{y}^{2})=(u^{2}+v^{2})\cdot (u_{x}^{2}+u_{y}^{2})$.
Thus,
    $0=u^{2}+v^{2}$ or $0=u_{x}^{2}+u_{y}^{2}$.

### Proof of Lemma 10

With $u^{2}=-v^{2}$, it follows that $u=v=0$ since $u(x,y)$ and $v(x,y)$ are real-valued, implying $f=u+iv=0$.
If $u_{x}^{2}=-u_{y}^{2}$, then $u_{x}^{2}=u_{y}^{2}=0$, and $u_{x}=u_{y}=0$. By the Cauchy-Riemann-Differential equation, $f'=0$. Thus, $f$ is constant on $D_{r}(z_{0})$.

## Proof

Let $z_{0}\in G$ be a local maximum point of $|f|$ in the domain $G$. Define $V:={z\in G:f(z)=f(z_{0})}$ as the set of all $z\in G$ mapped to $w:=f(z_{0})\in \mathbb {C}$ (level set).

### Proof 1: V is closed

Since $f$ is continuous, preimages of open sets are open, and preimages of closed sets are closed (in the relative topology of $G$). Thus, $V=f^{-1}({w})$ is closed in $G$.

### Proof 2: V is open

Using the lemma, $V$ can also be represented as a union of open disks, and unions of open sets are open.

### Proof 3: Connectivity

Thus, $V=G$ due to the connectivity of $U$, i.e., $f$ is constant.

### Proof 4: G is bounded

If $G$ is bounded, then ${\bar {G}}$ is compact. Therefore, the continuous function $f$ attains its maximum on ${\bar {G}}$, say at $z_{0}\in {\bar {G}}$. If $z_{0}\in G$, then $f$ is constant on $G$ (by the lemma) and hence on ${\bar {G}}$, so $f$ also attains its maximum on $\partial G$. Otherwise, $z_{0}\in \partial G$, completing the proof.

## See Also

* Cauchy-Riemann-Differential equation'
* Application of Cauchy-Riemann Equations

## Page Information

You can display this page as Wiki2Reveal slides

### Wiki2Reveal

TheWiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.
* This page is designed as a PanDocElectron-SLIDE document type.

### Translation and Version Control

This page was translated based on the following source page and uses the concept of Translation and Version Control for a transparent language fork in a Wikiversity:
* Source: Kurs:Funktionentheorie/Maximumprinzip - URL:
https://de.wikiversity.org/wiki/Kurs:Funktionentheorie/Maximumprinzip
* Date: 12/26/2024