# Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Academic resilience

* Multimedia presentation (3 min)

## Overview

Why are some students more impaired by adversities, setbacks, and pressures than others? Why do some students head on a downward trajectory of underperformance while others harness the challenge and bounce back? The answer lies in academic resilience.
Psychological resilience reflects the ability to positively adapt in the face of difficult experiences or traumatic circumstances. It is a widely research psychological concept which can be applied in range of contexts, including education. Academic resilience refers to the ability to achieve educational success despite significant environmental adversities (Cassidy, 2015).
The 5-C model of academic resilience proposes five individual-level psychological correlates of academic resilience, which build enjoyment of school, self-esteem, and class participation. Rojas (2015) broadly categorises a range of influencing risk and protective factors as pertaining to family environment, school climate, and difficulties arising from poverty. Research has identified numerous positive psychological and social benefits of academic resilience including self-efficacy, coping, and academic achievement.
Academic resilience can be enhanced through promoting related factors, such as motivation and engagement. The motivation and engagement model outlines the thoughts, feelings and behaviours of motivation and engagement in students and outlines practical applications to foster or support these factors. Implementing self-regulated learning strategies has been shown to improve academic resilience, which is facilitated by encouraging control and responsibility over one's learning. Moreover, student-educator focussed classroom interventions have proven to be advantageous, such as the project for enhancing effective learning (PEEL).
* Focus questions
* What is academic resilience?
* What factors affect academic resilience?
* Why does academic resilience matter?
* How can academic resilience be enhanced?

## What is academic resilience?

* "In an academic context, resilience is characterised by those students that present with the capacity to reverse academic misfortune and failure and succeed" (Cassidy, 2016, p. 2).

### Resilience

Psychological resilience is a construct which refers to the ability to positively adapt despite experiencing adversity or traumatic experiences (Luthar et al., 2014). Research has identified numerous types of resilience which include emotional, physical, external, and academic resilience (Luthar et al., 2014). Resilience research has progressed significantly since the 1970s, with many refinements and contextualisations across psychological disciplines, including education psychology, positive psychology, and learning (Coronado-Hijón, 2017). Importantly, resilience is not inherent - rather it consists of behaviours, thoughts, and actions which can be developed to some extent. It is a dynamic process which consists of interrelated factors (Cohen, 2013; Coronado-Hijhon, 2017).

### Academic resilience

Psychological resilience can be applied in many settings, including educational. Academic resilience is the likelihood or ability to achieve educational success despite adversity (Cassidy, 2016). Academic resilience is present when an individual is faced with significant adversity or a threat yet is able to positively adapt and achieve irrespective of that adversity or threat (Toland & Carrigan, 2011). Academic buoyancy is a neighbouring concept, which refers to resilience in the face of challenges or pressures such as exam pressure (Beale, 2020). Academic resilience pertains more to chronic adversities which are reflected in traditional resilience research, such as poverty (Cassidy, 2015).

## What are the factors affecting academic resilience?

Academic resilience can be positively or negatively influenced by individual, social, and environmental factors. Research has identified a multitude of factors which may influence students' likelihood of being academically resilient. Identifying these factors can assist when establishing practical applications and recommendations to foster or support academic resilience in students.

### 5-C model of academic resilience

The 5-C model of academic resilience, proposed by Martin and Marsh (2006), was created to identify the psychological correlates of academic resilience. These psychological correlates operate at an individual level. The model encompasses five protective psychological factors which correlate with academic resilience (see Figure 2):
* confidence (self-efficacy)
* coordination (planning)
* control
* composure (low anxiety)
* commitment (persistence).
Enjoyment of school, class participation, and overall self-esteem are outcomes of academic resilience (Martin & Marsh, 2006). Of the five factors, anxiety and self-efficacy are the strongest predictors, that is, low anxiety and high self-efficacy most strongly predict academic resilience.

### Risk and protective factors

Despite the presence of adversities, many students overcome risk factors and succeed in their studies (Foster, 2013). Influencing factors are wide ranging and may include individual, family, school environment and socioeconomic factors which either negatively impact or foster academic resilience (Cappella & Weinstein, 2001). Risk factors refer to measurable predictors of an adverse outcome and can be categorised as internal or external. The latter refers to factors which influence peoples' physical environment, such as poverty. The former refers to factors such as psychological disorders or decisions to engage in certain behaviours (Foster, 2013). Protective factors buffer reactions to both internal and external environmental stressors and provide resources to aid effective development. External protective factors refer to supports, such as teachers. Internal protective factors are personal traits or characteristics, such as self-efficacy and internal locus of control (Foster, 2013). Rojas (2015) identified a range of risk and protective factors (see Table 1).
Table 1.
Academic resilience risk and protective factors (Rojas, 2015)
| Environmental and social risk factors | Environmental and social protective factors | Individual level protective factors |
| Poverty | Low family stress | Optimism |
| Family dysfunction | Positive child relationship | Empathy |
| Family conflict | Positive parenting skills | Self-esteem |
| Lower economic status | Child attachment | Direction or mission |
| Lack of social support | Role models | Determination or perseverance |
| Marital conflict | High expectations | Motivation |
| Domestic violence | Family support and guidance | Autonomy |
| Harsh discipline | Opportunities for meaningful family involvement | Sense of purpose |
| Unsupportive parents | Respectful communication | Problem-solving or critical thinking skills |
| Lack of positive parenting skills | Higher economic status | Internal locus of control |
* Case Study 1 - Flynn
* Flynn is an 18-year-old who lives with his mother and father in a low socioeconomic area. His parents do not show any active interest in his education or future career and argue a lot at home. Flynn describes his relationship with his parents as "distant". At school he often does not show up to classes or turn in assignments, and exhibits a lack of optimism, self-esteem, and perseverance. Consequently, his academic performance is deemed below average by his educators.
* Flynn can be defined as a non-academically resilient student due to a lack of protective factors such as low family stress, positive parent-child relationship, positive child attachment, family support and guidance, and high socioeconomic status.
School environments play a critical role in fostering resilience alongside emotional, social, physical and cognitive development (Foster, 2013). School has the ability to provide a number of protective factors that buffer against academic failure, however, may also provide further adversities which increase the likelihood of failure (Borman & Overman, 2004). Protective factors may include providing support which may be lacking in a family context, listening without judgement, and providing structure and expectations (Foster, 2013). Importantly, these factors are reliant on supportive educators. Positive student-teacher relationships founded on trust have the ability to promote resilience and increase academic achievement (Foster, 2013). It is noteworthy that student relationships with peers, together with educators, can also positively influence resilience (Wasonga et al., 2003). Concurrently, involvement in school and extracurricular activities are protective external factors that assist in building resilience, identification with educational institution, and interpersonal connections (Foster, 2013).
Quiz
Which of the following is not a risk factor for academic resilience?
Marital conflict
Harsh discipline
Poverty
Role models
Family dysfunction :

## Why does academic resilience matter?

Resilience is a desirable and advantageous human characteristic which can positively influence aspects of health, performance, and overall wellbeing (Cassidy, 2016). It has been linked to several advantageous traits, behaviours and outcomes such as self-efficacy, effective coping, and academic achievement.

### Self-efficacy

Self-Efficacy, a concept originally proposed by Albert Bandura, refers to the perception of one's capabilities and has been identified as a valuable predictor across a wide range of psychological domains (Cassidy, 2015). Self-efficacy is necessary for meeting challenges and successfully completing tasks (Beale, 2020). Research which has examined the relationship between self-efficacy and academic resilience has shown high levels of academic self-efficacy is a positive predictor of academic resilience (Cassidy, 2015). What is more, academic self-efficacy and academic resilience have been identified as mediators of academic performance (Sadoughi, 2017).
The importance of self-efficacy in students is demonstrated in a study conducted by Hamill (2006). Adolescents enrolled in a psychology class were measured on adversity and a number of dimensions including self-efficacy and coping mechanisms. Procedures involved questionnaires and two tasks, an unsolvable anagram and storytelling task. Results identified four types of students: resilient, competent, maladaptive, and low competence/adversity. Resilient and competent students scored similarly regarding self-efficacy and coping mechanisms, which were the most important characteristics differentiating groups. The overall finding was that self-efficacy is prevalent in competent adolescents who also face adversity. Moreover, it demonstrates that those who face adversity can positively adapt, which ultimately characterises resilience (Hamill, 2006). Notably, there is a lack of research on what students with high self-efficacy actually do which contribute to success in their studies (Cassidy, 2015).

### Coping

Coping refers to the cognitive and behavioural efforts which manage demands or stressors to ultimately maintain positive adaptation (Tamannaeifar & Shahmirzaei, 2019). Coping is a self-regulatory process which is interrelated with resilience. There are two types of coping: problem-focused and emotion-focused coping (Hamill, 2003). Problem-focused coping refers to purposeful and practical attempts to control the stressor. For example, seeking solutions or attempting to remove the stressor. Emotion-focused coping refers to dealing with stressors through attaining optimal negative emotion regulation. For example, support seeking or distraction (Meneghel et al., 2019).
Research findings support coping ability as a significant predictor of resilience in academic settings, particularly in university students (McLafferty et al., 2012). Specifically, problem-focused coping is positively correlated with academic resilience and emotion-focused coping is negatively correlated with academic resilience (Tamannaeifar & Shahmirzaei, 2019). These findings conclude that coping style impacts on resilience. Meneghel et al. (2019) report a similar correlations, along with an additional, meaning-focused coping style which is characterised by cognitive strategies which regulate positive emotions. This style of coping involves positively framing the stressor as a challenge through harnessing beliefs, values, and goals, to sustain coping (Ortego-Maldonado & Salanova, 2018).

### Academic achievement

Academic achievement is the ultimate consequence of academic resilience. That is, positive adaption to aversive circumstances results in rewarding academic outcomes. This construct is largely measured by tangible academic grades including percentages, GPAs, rankings and scores (Martin & Marsh, 2009). There is consistent evidence that resilience is positively correlated with academic achievement. In a study of international undergraduates both resilience and self-esteem were significant predictors of academic achievement. Specifically, the resilience-performance relationship was represented by a range of factors all of which relate to positive adaptation and coping ability (Kwek et al., 2013). Regarding performance in at-risk individuals, a study of at risk youth found a positive correlation between resilience and academic performance, measured via grade point average (GPA). However, achievement was associated with different resilience factors among the three groups. This indicates that resilience is not a uniformly acting characteristic which presents implications from a practical perspective (Novotný & Kremenkova, 2016).
However, multiple studies support an indirect relationship between resilience and academic achievement. A university sample study revealed that academic resilience is indirectly related to academic performance, which is mediated by academic satisfaction. This suggests cognitive attitudes, namely satisfaction, may be a key antecedent of academic achievement (Meneghel et al., 2019). Similariy, a secondary education study determined school engagement is a mediating factor between resilience and academic achievement (Rodriguez-Fernandez et al., 2018). Taken together, these indirect relationships may suggest supplementary factors like satisfaction and engagement may be superior predictors of academic achievement than resilience alone.
Quiz
Allison is in the final semester of her undergraduate degree and has three upcoming exams. She is feeling overwhelmed and decides to call a family member to share her feelings and ask for support. Which coping style is she using?
Problem-focused coping
Meaning-focused coping
Emotion-focused coping :

## How can academic resilience be enhanced?

Academic resilience can be promoted, rather than fixed, through focusing on enhancing a range of factors. Fostering resilience is important not only because it is how people deal with challenges and adversities, but also because it promotes communication, problem-solving, and decision-making skills (Rojas, 2015).

### Motivation and engagement

The motivation and engagement model, proposed by Martin (2014), aims to reflect the thoughts, feelings, and behaviours underpinning motivation and engagement in students. Accordingly, it provides a framework for practical methods to enhance or support these factors within classroom and counselling contexts. Both motivation and engagement play a role in academic resilience, in fact, all factors within the model present significant correlations (Martin & Marsh, 2006). Lack of motivation or engagement may result in loss of academic progress or success (Martin, 2002). Essentially, enhancing motivation and engagement may in turn enhance academic resilience.
Eleven key factors were identified which comprise ‘boosters’, ‘mufflers’ and ‘guzzlers’ (see Figure 4). These refer to factors which enhance, impede, or reduce motivation and engagement respectively. It is proposed that student-level protective and risk factors determine boosters, mufflers, and guzzlers. Students high on boosters and low on mufflers and guzzlers are motivated and engaged, while the opposite is true for unmotivated and unengaged students. Promoting boosters and reducing mufflers and guzzlers will facilitate both motivation and engagement, and subsequently academic resilience (Martin, 2002; Martin, 2014) Practically, this entails altering educators' messages, student expectations, structure of learning, feedback, classroom goals, and assessment. The use of these directions will depend on the salience of these factors. Individual students or the overall classroom climate can be assessed using the proposed model (Martin, 2002; Martin, 2014).
Table 2.
Strategies to improve factors within the motivation and engagement model (Martin, 2014; Martin, 2002)
| Self-belief | Breaking school work into smaller components, individualising tasks, reframing success in terms of mastery, personal bests, and improvement and addressing negative thinking |
| Learning focus | Emphasising personal bests and encouraging the process of learning rather than the destination i.e., marks |
| Value of schooling | Demonstrating the relevance of school content to world events, personal lives, and interests and highlighting the use of skills outside the classroom |
| Persistence | Referencing times where the student as persisted, instances of past success, and incorporating goal-setting |
| Planning and task management | Teaching planning and monitoring strategies such as considering what the task is, how to do it, formulating steps, creating a plan and monitoring progress |
| Anxiety | Developing relaxation strategies, helping students better prepare for assessment and highlighting the present moment |
| Uncertain control | Promoting a growth mindset, focusing on "controllables", giving students choice over lesson objectives or class activities, and providing regular feedback |
| Failure avoidance and self-sabotage | Creating a classroom climate of cooperation, normalising mistakes, discouraging competition, and de-emphasising achievement-self-worth link |
| Disengagement | Emphasising the "controllables", addressing skills impeding progress, and involving family if necessary |

### Self-regulated learning

Self-regulated learning is where learners actively take control and responsibility for their learning, through setting academic goals and monitoring, controlling, and regulating their cognition, motivation, and behaviour (Mohan & Verma, 2020). Self-regulated learning strategies are significantly related to academic resilience and achievement (Nota et al., 2004).
Seven educational strategies for classroom instruction and student-educator interactions are proposed, alongside the corresponding self-regulated learning aspect (Goetz et al., 2013):
* Goal setting: Help students set challenging realistic goals and standards
* Monitoring: Have students observe and record their own behaviour
* Planning: Teach student instructions they can give themselves to remind them of what they need to do
* Evaluation: Encourage student to evaluate their own achievement
* Motivation: Teach student to reinforce themselves for correct behaviour
* Freedom: Provide students with opportunities to practice learning with minimal help from teachers
* Regulation: Provide strategies that students can use to solve interpersonal issues

### Interventions

Classroom interventions which target active learning and student-educator relationships have proven to be efficacious. This is not surprising as the positive relationship between educational support and academic resilience is supported, suggesting resilient behaviour has a large human relationship component (Bester & Kuyper, 2020). The Project for Enhancing Effective Learning (PEEL) is a program centred around learning tendencies, behaviours, attitudes, conceptions, and reflections of students (Martin, 2002). The program is driven by educators and aims to foster metacognition, active learning, and increase student responsibility and control over learning (Loughran et al., 2001). Within this program a number of activities target strategies for defining tasks, types of processing, approaches to learning, reflective thinking, and evaluation of outcomes (Martin, 2002). The structure and components of PEEL are consistent with the key factors and proposed applications within the conceptual model of motivation and engagement and closely aligns with self-regulated learning. Thus, PEEL may be an advantageous application of this model and learning style.

## Conclusion

Academic resilience is the ability to positively adapt and succeed in academic endeavours despite significant adversities. While academic resilience can be influenced by a range of risk and protective factors, many students still manage to use setbacks as "springboards" for motivation and achieve success. This process can ensure several positive psychological and social benefits, including increased self-efficacy, effective coping, and academic achievement. Academic resilience can be enhanced through promoting related factors, as demonstrated by the model of motivation and engagement, implementing self-regulated learning strategies, and fostering positive student-educator relationships via interventions. Through these methods students, teachers, and educational institutions can foster, enhance, and support academic resilience. Future research should endeavour to examine the actual behaviours of academically resilient students and build a comprehensive view of resilience in non-westernised cultures.