# Evidence-based assessment/Vignettes/Tamika

HGAPS is finding new ways to make psychological science conferences more accessible!
Here are examples from APA 2022 and the JCCAP Future Directions Forum. Coming soon... ABCT! ~ More at HGAPS.org ~

# Tamika - Assessment Phase
## Clinical description

Tamika is an 11 year old African American female in regular education. Her mother sought treatment for her increased anger, aggression, being “hyper,” having trouble sleeping, lying, talking to herself, and stealing. At home, she was often cranky and refused to share things with her two siblings and younger cousin, who were all living in the same house. When she had tantrums, she screamed, threw things, broke a plate and some toys, and escalated to the point that the mother worried she might injure someone. Tamika is starting to have problems at school, including lower grades and disruptive classroom behaviors such as talking out of turn, getting easily distracted, and frequently arguing with peers and some teachers.

## Checklist scores

Tamika, her mother, and her teacher all completed the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) checklists. Here are the results, reported as T scores (M = 50, standard deviation (SD) = 10, compared to other women between 11 and 18 years of age).
ASEBA Scores :
| Scale | Mom | Tamika | Teacher |
| Externalizing | 82 | 75 | 56 |
| Internalizing | 70 | 66 | 54 |
| Anxious/Depressed | 60 | 64 | 59 |
| Withdrawn | 64 | 61 | 50 |
| Somatic Complaints | 76 | 68 | 50 |
| Attention Problems | 68 | 66 | 63 |
| Social Problems | 74 | 73 | 50 |
| Thought Problems | 75 | 70 | 57 |
| Delinquent/Rule-Breaking | 76 | 53 | 50 |
| Aggressive Behavior | 91 | 54 | 59 |

# Prediction phase

Let's see how we would apply the Evidence-Based Assessment principles to Tamika.

## Shortlist of probable hypotheses

Based on Tamika's age and the common clinical issues, here are the possible issues:
* Oppositional defiant disorder is a leading hypothesis, based on her high externalizing scores across different reporting groups, and especially from her mother. It also is common.
* Conduct problems would be a second possible diagnosis.
* Attention problems are worth evaluating based on prevalence, though her prior academic performance does not suggest any additional reason for concern.
* Post traumatic stress disorder would be worth considering based on prevalence; nothing immediately suggests it in the presenting problem, but it could explain a similar set of symptoms.
* Parent-child conflict or an adolescent acting out in a somewhat chaotic home environment also should be a contending hypothesis.

## Diagnostic interview findings

Diagnoses are based on a LEAD (Longitudinal expert evaluation of all data) consensus meeting following a Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (KSADS) interview, using DSM-IV criteria. The same interviewer met with Tamika, and then her mother, then discussed any differences of opinion with them as needed to use clinical judgment. KSADS results were reviewed with a licensed clinical psychologist to arrive at a final decision.
* PTSD (100% confidence post interview)
* ADHD (65% confidence post interview)
* ODD (70% confidence post interview)
* Rule out: reactive attachment disorder (49% confidence post interview)
* Rule out: mood NOS (33% confidence post interview)

### Narrative summary of interview (spoilers)
## Alternatives to Diagnostic Interview

While the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (KSADS) interview is the gold standard for assessing children and adolescents for psychological disorders, its length makes it impractical for most clinical settings. Instead, the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is used to assess for mental illness, which is also problematic because this scale has no trauma sub-scale. Had this assessment scale been used to evaluate Tamika, it is likely her trauma would have been missed. The scales below are specific trauma measurements that can be used in addition to the CBCL.
Measures for Screening and Assessing PTSD in Youth :
| Measure | Ages | Assessment Subscales | Assessment Subscales | Assessment Subscales | Versions | Comments/Source |
| Measure | Ages | Subscales | Thresholds | Tamika's Subscale scores | Versions | Comments/Source |
| Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS-5) - Wikipedia Overview - Wikiversity Overview - Blank Symptom Scale - HGAPS CPSS-5 Survey - Tamika's filled out CPSS-5 | 8–18 years | Symptoms (re-experiencing, avoidance, hyperarousal) - 17 items - Composite score ranges 0-51 | Below Threshold [0-10] Subclinical-Mild [11-15] Mild [16-20] Moderate [21-25] Moderately Severe [26-30] Severe [31-40] Extremely Severe [41-51] | 36; severe | Child Self Report Clinician Interview Caregiver Report (in development) English Language Multiple languages for DSM-IV version | Good correspondence between the versions; PTSD rates higher with child report. Foa et al. (2018) |
| Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS-5) - Wikipedia Overview - Wikiversity Overview - Blank Symptom Scale - HGAPS CPSS-5 Survey - Tamika's filled out CPSS-5 | 8–18 years | Functional Impairments - 7 Items - Composite score ranges 0-7 | Impairment is measured from 0 to 7 | 4 | Child Self Report Clinician Interview Caregiver Report (in development) English Language Multiple languages for DSM-IV version | Good correspondence between the versions; PTSD rates higher with child report. Foa et al. (2018) |
| UCLA Child/ Adolescent PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 (PTSD-RI-5) - Wikiversity Overview - Blank UCLA C/A PTSD Index | 7-18 years | Criteria A, Exposure to Traumatic Event - Trauma History (Items 1-13) & Peritraumatic Distress (Items 14-23, not scored) - Includes scores for Dissociative Symptoms | If ≥ 1 Dissociative Symptoms, assign Dissociative Subtype | | Child Self Report ( ≤ 6 years) Clinician Interview Caregiver Report  English, Spanish, German, Arabic, Japanese, Simplified Chinese, Korean, | |
| UCLA Child/ Adolescent PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 (PTSD-RI-5) - Wikiversity Overview - Blank UCLA C/A PTSD Index | 7-18 years | DSM-5 Criteria B, Re-Experiencing - 5 items - 0 (None) - 4 (Most) | - Cumulative score ≥ 38 indicates likely PTSD - Diagnosis Requirement of: ≥ 1 Criteria B symptom; ≥ 1 Criteria C symptom; ≥ 2 Criteria D symptoms; ≥ 1 Criteria E | | Child Self Report ( ≤ 6 years) Clinician Interview Caregiver Report  English, Spanish, German, Arabic, Japanese, Simplified Chinese, Korean, | |
| UCLA Child/ Adolescent PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 (PTSD-RI-5) - Wikiversity Overview - Blank UCLA C/A PTSD Index | 7-18 years | DSM-5 Criteria C, Avoidance/ Numbing - 2 items - 0 (None) - 4 (Most) | - Cumulative score ≥ 38 indicates likely PTSD - Diagnosis Requirement of: ≥ 1 Criteria B symptom; ≥ 1 Criteria C symptom; ≥ 2 Criteria D symptoms; ≥ 1 Criteria E | | Child Self Report ( ≤ 6 years) Clinician Interview Caregiver Report  English, Spanish, German, Arabic, Japanese, Simplified Chinese, Korean, | |
| UCLA Child/ Adolescent PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 (PTSD-RI-5) - Wikiversity Overview - Blank UCLA C/A PTSD Index | 7-18 years | DSM-5 Criteria D, Hyperarousal - 13 items (7 scored) - 0 (None) - 4 (Most) | - Cumulative score ≥ 38 indicates likely PTSD - Diagnosis Requirement of: ≥ 1 Criteria B symptom; ≥ 1 Criteria C symptom; ≥ 2 Criteria D symptoms; ≥ 1 Criteria E | | Child Self Report ( ≤ 6 years) Clinician Interview Caregiver Report  English, Spanish, German, Arabic, Japanese, Simplified Chinese, Korean, | |
| UCLA Child/ Adolescent PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 (PTSD-RI-5) - Wikiversity Overview - Blank UCLA C/A PTSD Index | 7-18 years | DSM-5 Criteria E, Alterations in Arousal and Reactivity - 7 items (6 scored) - 0 (None) - 4 (Most) | - Cumulative score ≥ 38 indicates likely PTSD - Diagnosis Requirement of: ≥ 1 Criteria B symptom; ≥ 1 Criteria C symptom; ≥ 2 Criteria D symptoms; ≥ 1 Criteria E | | Child Self Report ( ≤ 6 years) Clinician Interview Caregiver Report  English, Spanish, German, Arabic, Japanese, Simplified Chinese, Korean, | |
| Young Child PTSD Checklist (YCPC) - Blank YCPC Checklist | 1-6 years | Trauma Exposure - 13 items - Not scored, but done to facilitate recall of total trauma exposure | NA | NA | Caregiver Report | Scheering & Haslett (2010) Available at: http://www.midss.org/content/young-child-ptsd-checklist This scale is intended for children ages 1-6 which is not applicable to Vignette Tamika. |
| Young Child PTSD Checklist (YCPC) - Blank YCPC Checklist | 1-6 years | PTSD Symptoms - 23 items rated from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Everyday) | Sum score ≥26 | NA | Caregiver Report | Scheering & Haslett (2010) Available at: http://www.midss.org/content/young-child-ptsd-checklist This scale is intended for children ages 1-6 which is not applicable to Vignette Tamika. |
| Young Child PTSD Checklist (YCPC) - Blank YCPC Checklist | 1-6 years | Functional Impairments - 6 Items rated from 0 (Hardly ever/none) to 4 (Everyday) | Sume score ≥4 | NA | Caregiver Report | Scheering & Haslett (2010) Available at: http://www.midss.org/content/young-child-ptsd-checklist This scale is intended for children ages 1-6 which is not applicable to Vignette Tamika. |
| Child Behavior Checklist-Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale (CBCL-PTSD) | 11-18 years | PTSD Symptoms (14 item version is recommended) | | | Parent report Youth report (Teacher report not recommended) | Strongest support is for the Youth Self Report version of this measure; mixed findings for this measure with preschool aged children.  Ruggiero & McLeer (2000); You et al. (2017). |
| International Trauma Questionnaire Child and Adolescent Version (ITQ-CA) - Blank ITQ-CA - Tamika's filled out ITQ-CA | 7-17 years | PTSD Score with Functional Impairment - 6 items scored from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always) - Scores ≥2 indicate presence of symptom - 5 Items assessing impairment in life domains - Rated Yes/No | Presence of at least one symptom in each PTSD symptom cluster accompanied by at least one functional impairment | | Youth report | The measure has been found to have strong psychometric properties, as well as strong discriminant validity between PTSD and DSO. |
| International Trauma Questionnaire Child and Adolescent Version (ITQ-CA) - Blank ITQ-CA - Tamika's filled out ITQ-CA | 7-17 years | Self-Organization Score with Functional Impairment - 6 Items scored from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always) - Scores ≥2 indicate presence of symptom - 5 Items assessing impairment in life domains - Rated Yes/No | Presence of at least one symptom in each PTSD symptom cluster accompanied by at least one functional impairment | | Youth report | The measure has been found to have strong psychometric properties, as well as strong discriminant validity between PTSD and DSO. |
| International Trauma Questionnaire Child and Adolescent Version (ITQ-CA) - Blank ITQ-CA - Tamika's filled out ITQ-CA | 7-17 years | Complex PTSD Score - 12 items scored from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always) - Scores ≥2 indicate presence of symptom - This subscale encompasses both the PTSD and Self-Organization subscaless | PTSD score and Self-Organization score meet or exceed clinical threshold | | Youth report | The measure has been found to have strong psychometric properties, as well as strong discriminant validity between PTSD and DSO. |

## Risk and protective factors and moderators

Tamika's gender and age make her on the bubble between oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, for which she is on the younger side of the range[citation needed].

## Updating probability of diagnoses

Below is a worksheet with the DLRs left blank to be filled in. Answers are below.
Worksheet :
| Tamika | Common Dx Hypotheses (A) | Starting Prob. (B) | Broad Measure (D) | Broad Measure (D) | Broad Measure (D) | Cross-informant (E) | Cross-informant (E) | Cross-informant (E) | Confirmation (G) |
| | Base Rate from Rettew et al. (2009) SDI | Base Rate from Rettew et al. (2009) SDI | Scale & Score | DLR | Revised Prob. | Next Test score | DLR | Revised Prob. | K-SADS Interview |
| Any Anxiety | Specific Phobia | 0.15 | | | | | | | |
| Any Anxiety | PTSD | 0.09 | | | | | | | PTSD (100%) |
| Any Anxiety | GAD | 0.10 | CBCL T Internalizing 70 | 0.98 | ? | Other measures are better than Achenbach | | | |
| Any Anxiety | Panic Disorder | 0.11 | | | | | | | |
| Any Anxiety | Social Phobia | 0.20 | | | | | | | |
| Any Anxiety | Separation Anxiety | 0.18 | | | | | | | |
| Any Impulse Control Disorder | ODD | 0.38 | CBCL T Aggressive 91 | 4.18 | ? | No data about TRF scales for aggressive | | | ODD (70%) |
| Any Impulse Control Disorder | CD | 0.25 | CBCL T Aggressive 91 | 4.18 | ? | No data about TRF scales for aggressive | | | |
| Any Impulse Control Disorder | ADHD | 0.38 | CBCL T Attention 68 | 6.92 | ? | TRF T Attention 63 | 0.73 | 0.76 | ADHD combined (65%) |
| Any Mood Disorder | MDD | 0.26 | CBCL T Anx/Dep 60 | 3.78 | ? | Haven't found data about TRF for internalizing | | | |
| Any Mood Disorder | BP | | | | | | | | |
| Any Mood Disorder | Dysthymia | 0.08 | | | | | | | |
| Any Substance Abuse Disorder | Any Substance Abuse Disorder | 0.30 | CBCL #2 CBCL #99 CBCL #105 | | | | | | |
Click below for filled out chart.
Answers :
| Tamika | Common Dx Hypotheses (A) | Starting Prob. (B) | Broad Measure (D) | Broad Measure (D) | Broad Measure (D) | Cross-informant (E) | Cross-informant (E) | Cross-informant (E) | Confirmation (G) |
| | Base Rate from Rettew et al. (2009) SDI | Base Rate from Rettew et al. (2009) SDI | Scale & Score | DLR | Revised Prob. | Next Test score | DLR | Revised Prob. | K-SADS Interview |
| Any Anxiety | Specific Phobia | 0.15 | | | | | | | |
| Any Anxiety | PTSD | 0.09 | | | | | | | PTSD (100%) |
| Any Anxiety | GAD | 0.10 | CBCL T Internalizing 70 | 0.98 | 0.11 | Other measures are better than Achenbach | | | |
| Any Anxiety | Panic Disorder | 0.11 | | | | | | | |
| Any Anxiety | Social Phobia | 0.20 | | | | | | | |
| Any Anxiety | Separation Anxiety | 0.18 | | | | | | | |
| Any Impulse Control Disorder | ODD | 0.38 | CBCL T Aggressive 91 | 4.18 | 0.72 | No data about TRF scales for aggressive | | | ODD (70%) |
| Any Impulse Control Disorder | CD | 0.25 | CBCL T Aggressive 91 | 4.18 | 0.58 | No data about TRF scales for aggressive | | | |
| Any Impulse Control Disorder | ADHD | 0.38 | CBCL T Attention 68 | 6.92 | 0.81 | TRF T Attention 63 | 0.73 | 0.76 | ADHD combined (65%) |
| Any Mood Disorder | MDD | 0.26 | CBCL T Anx/Dep 60 | 3.78 | 0.57 | Haven't found data about TRF for internalizing | | | |
| Any Mood Disorder | BP | | | | | | | | |
| Any Mood Disorder | Dysthymia | 0.08 | | | | | | | |
| Any Substance Abuse Disorder | Any Substance Abuse Disorder | 0.30 | CBCL #2 CBCL #99 CBCL #105 | | | | | | |

# Prescription phase
## Genogram and family functioning

Here is a genogram of Tamika's family:
Mom is effectively a single parent raising Tamika and three brothers and a sister. The kids have three different fathers; none of them are currently in the home or contributing directly to child support. On the other hand, there is not any significant conflict with Tamika's father, and she sees him intermittently.
The plot twist hinges around the "uncle" who is shown as being both in and out of the house. Skip to the diagnostic interview section if you want the details.

## Possible Treatment Selection

* Additional Resource: Evidence-Based PTSD Treatments
TF-CBT stands for Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and it was developed by Dr. Anthony Mannarino, Dr. Judith Cohen, and Dr. Esther Deblinger. It is an evidence-based treatment intended to reduce trauma symptoms in children ages 3 to 18 that have been exposed to at least one traumatic event. This treatment focuses on processing the memories, thoughts, and behaviors associated with the traumatic event. It incorporates cognitive therapy, behavioral therapy, family therapy, attachment theory, and developmental neurobiology. TF-CBT is typically provided over 12 to 16 weekly sessions but may take longer for children with complex trauma (i.e., chronic or multiple experiences).
MATCH-ADTC stands for Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, Trauma, or Conduct Problems developed by Dr. Bruce Chorpita & Dr. John Weisz. It is an evidence-based treatment designed for children ages 6 to 15 designed to specifically target/treat anxiety, depression, trauma, PTSD, and behavioral problems. This treatment is based on years of past empirically-based research and treatments, and the therapy can also address related issues that could arise during therapy treatment. This therapy is a type of Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (CBT).
CFTSI stands for Child and Family Traumatic Stress Intervention and was developed by the Yale Child Study Center. It is an evidence-based treatment designed for children ages 7 to 18 and is intended for all trauma types, including single, chronic, or multiple event exposures. This therapy centers around improving communication between child and caregiver and providing behavioral skills for both parties to cope with the symptoms caused by trauma. CFTSI is typically provided over 4 sessions and materials have been translated into Spanish.
ITCT-A stands for Integrative Treatment of Complex Trauma for Adolescents and was developed by Dr. John Briere and Dr. Cheryl Lanktree. It is an evidence-based treatment designed for children ages 12 to 21 and is applicable for those with complex trauma, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse and neglect, community violence, domestic violence, medical trauma, and traumatic loss. It may also be used for those with a history of parental substance abuse. This therapy focuses on increasing self-esteem, managing triggers, improving relationships, and affect regulation. ITCT-A is provided over 16 to 36 sessions and has been adapted for Spanish-speakers.
TARGET stands for Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy and was developed by Dr. Julian Ford and Dr. Josephine Hawke for children ages 10 and up and it is applicable for those with complex trauma, as well as those with traumatic loss. This therapy focuses on affect and emotional regulation, reducing PTSD, depression, anxiety, anger symptoms and reducing behavioral incidents. TARGET is provided over 10 sessions and has been translated into Spanish. It also has the cultural characteristics for those with low SES and those in the Juvenile and Adult Criminal Justice system, Foster Families, and Single Parent Family situations.
CCT stands for Cue-Centered Therapy and was developed by Dr. Victor Carrion, Dr. Hilit Kletter, and Dr. Ryan Matlow. It is an evidence-based treatment designed for children ages 8 to 18 and is intended for those with chronic traumatic experiences. This therapy focuses on the allostatic load, or the compounding effect of traumas throughout their lives, rather than singling out particular traumatic experiences. CCT is provided over 15 sessions and includes joint sessions for the child and their caregiver.
DCS stands for D-cycloserine, which is an antibiotic and partial N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) agonist. This antibiotic is currently being studied in adults and children for the reduction of PTSD symptoms. In conjunction with CBT, DCS was found to reduce the adverse symptoms of PTSD; and when compared to CBT + placebo, CBT + DCS was found to maintain stability of symptoms for a longer period of time. The antibiotic is believed to reduce PTSD symptoms by increasing the rate of adverse memory extinction.
PT stands for Play Therapy which was first introduced by Anna Freud and has been designed for children ages 3 to 13 who have experienced traumatic events. This therapy focuses on building self-confidence within the child and allowing the child to relax...
EMBR stands for Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing...
REM Deprivation...
Psychopharmacological Options include...