# PlanetPhysics/Behaviour of Measuring Rods and Clocks in Motion
### The Behaviour of Measuring-Rods and Clocks in Motion

From Relativity: The Special and General Theory by Albert Einstein Place a metre-rod in the $x'$-axis of $K'$ in such a manner that one end (the beginning) coincides with the point $x'=0$ whilst the other end (the end of the rod) coincides with the point $x'=I$. What is the length of the metre-rod relatively to the system $K$? In order to learn this, we need only ask where the beginning of the rod and the end of the rod lie with respect to $K$ at a particular time $t$ of the system $K$. By means of the first equation of The Lorentz transformation the values of these two points at the time $t=0$ can be shown to be
   ${\begin{matrix}x_{\mbox{(begining of rod)}}&=&0{\overline {\sqrt {I-{\frac {v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}}}\\x_{\mbox{(end of rod)}}&=&1{\overline {\sqrt {I-{\frac {v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}}}\end{matrix}}$
\noindent the distance between the points being ${\sqrt {I-v^{2}/c^{2}}}$.
But the metre-rod is moving with the velocity v relative to K. It therefore follows that the length of a rigid metre-rod moving in the direction of its length with a velocity $v$ is ${\sqrt {I-v^{2}/c^{2}}}$ of a metre.
The rigid rod is thus shorter when in motion than when at rest, and the more quickly it is moving, the shorter is the rod. For the velocity $v=c$ we should have ${\sqrt {I-v^{2}/c^{2}}}=0$, and for stiII greater velocities the square-root becomes imaginary. From this we conclude that in the theory of relativity the velocity $c$ plays the part of a limiting velocity, which can neither be reached nor exceeded by any real body.
Of course this feature of the velocity $c$ as a limiting velocity also clearly follows from the equations of the Lorentz transformation, for these became meaningless if we choose values of $v$ greater than $c$.
If, on the contrary, we had considered a metre-rod at rest in the $x$-axis with respect to $K$, then we should have found that the length of the rod as judged from $K'$ would have been ${\sqrt {I-v^{2}/c^{2}}}$; this is quite in accordance with the principle of relativity which forms the basis of our considerations.
A Priori it is quite clear that we must be able to learn something about the physical behaviour of measuring-rods and clocks from the equations of transformation, for the magnitudes $z,y,x,t$, are nothing more nor less than the results of measurements obtainable by means of measuring-rods and clocks. If we had based our considerations on the Galileian transformation we should not have obtained a contraction of the rod as a consequence of its motion.
Let us now consider a seconds-clock which is permanently situated at the origin ($x'=0$) of $K'$. $t'=0$ and $t'=I$ are two successive ticks of this clock. The first and fourth equations of the Lorentz transformation give for these two ticks:
$t=0$
\noindent and
$t'={\frac {I}{\sqrt {I-{\frac {v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}}}$ ~
As judged from $K$, the clock is moving with the velocity $v$; as judged from this reference-body, the time which elapses between two strokes of the clock is not one second, but
${\frac {I}{\sqrt {I-{\frac {v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}}}$ ~
\noindent seconds, {\it i.e.} a somewhat larger time. As a consequence of its motion the clock goes more slowly than when at rest. Here also the velocity $c$ plays the part of an unattainable limiting velocity.