OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Social enterprise and public procurement

A research programme funded by EQUAL BEST Procurement
by Tim Curtis and Patricia Worgan, Sustainable Development Research Centre

## BEST Procurement stands for Benefiting the Economy and Society Through Procurement.

It is a second round Equal CIP Programme that is being developed by SEEM. The programme will focus on combating labour market discrimination by channelling the purchasing power of the public sector, using social enterprise as a vehicle, combining social inclusion and economic growth.
The aim of the Development Partnership is to increase equal opportunities in the labour market and diversity within the supply chain by channelling public sector purchasing power through social enterprise. This will achieve economic growth in a sustainable and equitable manner, reflecting the needs of communities of interest to access quality, meaningful employment.
The objectives of the programme are:
* Influencing public sector procurement strategies-To enable the public sector to pursue economic, environmental and social objectives concurrently through channelling existing purchasing power.
* Creating market opportunities for social enterprises - To create social enterprise market opportunities within the public sector, focused on labour market integration and the needs of communities of interest.
* Developing the capacity of social enterprises - Ensure the development of social enterprises capitalise on the market opportunities created through winning and sustaining contracts.
* Achieving labour market integration- Through creating additional and improved employment opportunities within social enterprise for people experiencing labour market discrimination and/ or disadvantage.
The Sustainable Development Research Centre is the research partner on the programme and this is a developing record of the research process.

## Table of contents

* Introduction
* Research protocol
* Research question
* Theoretical underpinnings
* Supply side interventions
The EU EQUAL programme is for everyone, nobody has exclusive rights to the material generated, what we write is for all the partners specifically (and everyone generally) and we want to encourage a collaborative approach to the research and the reflections on the research.
This resource is constantly growing and changing, please take the contents as they are intended to be: reflections on a growing and developing research programme, not advice or a complete piece of work.
# 2 Research Question

The research question for this project is: How, and under what conditions, do market development activities geared towards public procurement, such as the East Midlands BEST Procurement programme, contribute to the sustainability of social enterprises?
To elicit the underlying assumptions and implications of this question, the following questions can also be posed:

## 2.1 Related questions

* What is 'social enterprise' and how does it differ from 'mainstream' business, and what are the implications of this difference?
* How do organisations, like social enterprises, incorporate new knowledge and skills into their operations and how do they capitalise on these changes?
* How does a social enterprise change to meet new opportunities such as public contracts?
* What changes occur within public sector organisations in developing more open markets and mature supply chains that include social enterprises as a business model?
* How do contract opportunities change to allow social enterprises to fairly distinguish themselves in tender/contract opportunities?
* What advantages/disadvantages do social enterprises experience in public procurement opportunities, and are they fair?

## 2.2 Wider considerations

* What contribution does social enterprise, as a concept and in practice, have to make to late capitalism?
* Can the social enterprise model contribute to the increased social and environmental sustainability of the 'mainstream' private sector
* What are the implications for public policy of increased public sector contracting of social enterprises?
* What policy implications are there for the East Midlands in developing the social enterprise sector?
# Social cognition

This psychology resource is a "stub". Learn how you can help Wikiversity to develop it.
# Solar System, interactive/Earth/Solar System overview/Jupiter

Jupiter
Jupiter is the largest planet in the solar system. Jupiter is so big that you could cram 1,000 Earths inside of it! Jupiter has 4 big moons and many small ones. Jupiter has rings around it, like Saturn, but they are not easily seen. As you can see there are shapes of mountains and a sea in this image of Jupiter.
# Solar System, interactive/Earth/Solar System overview/Earth

The Earth
Earth is the third planet from the Sun, and the fifth largest of the nine planets. The Earth is orbited by one moon.
# Solar System

Resources on Solar System:
* Solar System, technical
* Solar System, interactive
* solar system such as those around other stars
* Planets in the solar system
# Solar System, interactive

Important: not finished! See: how you can help.
The Solar System
When the Sun sets and people go to bed, if there are no clouds, we can see the stars in the sky. Thousands of lights hang over the Earth. Come with us on a journey through our Solar System. Let’s touch the stars. Click on the sky and enjoy this journey through space.
{{Astronomy resources}}
# Solar System, interactive/Earth/Solar System overview

Earth and other planets orbit around the Sun
This is the solar system. This means everything flying round the Sun. The Sun is that flaming ball in the center. Other balls are planets flying around it on their ellipses. The first four planets are near to the Sun. We call them Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars. The small ball near to the Earth is Earth’s Moon. Further from the sun, there is a belt of asteroids. Behind it you can see other planets, such as Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. There are also other objects such as comets and a minor planet called Pluto. By clicking on them you can get more information.
# Solar/Howard Community College/Fall2011

These are the solar teams for fall2011 HCC.
    fall2011
# Solar System, interactive/Earth

Earth is shaped like a ball. It is not a flat land, as we see it, when we stand on the street or in the meadow. This ball is flying through space around the Sun. You might ask, “why don’t we fall into this dark space?” The answer is because of gravity. Gravity is a power which holds us on the Earth. “And what protects us from space?” – “It is the atmosphere”. Clouds form part of this atmosphere. And now, let’s leave the Earth by clicking on the space we are flying through to have a look at Our Solar System.
Earth is a ball
# Spotted lanternfly invasion/Host species list

Keeping track of the host plants (plants that various life stages feed on), and the damage to the plants will be useful and important as the bugs spread.

## Wikiversity lists

* Host plants
* Non-host plants
(See Bloom Clock for an example of user-generated plant lists on Wikiversity.)
# Micromechanics of composites/Proof 6
## Curl of the gradient of a vector - 1

Let $\mathbf {v}$ be a vector field. Show that
    ${\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} )=0~.$
Proof:
For a second order tensor field ${\boldsymbol {S}}$, we can define the curl as
    $({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\times {\boldsymbol {S}})\cdot \mathbf {a} ={\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\times ({\boldsymbol {S}}^{T}\cdot \mathbf {a} )$
where $\mathbf {a}$ is an arbitrary constant vector. Substituting ${\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v}$ into the definition, we have
    $[{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} )]\cdot \mathbf {a} ={\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} ^{T}\cdot \mathbf {a} )~.$
Since $\mathbf {a}$ is constant, we may write
    ${\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} ^{T}\cdot \mathbf {a} ={\boldsymbol {\nabla }}(\mathbf {v} \cdot \mathbf {a} )={\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\varphi$
where $\varphi =\mathbf {v} \cdot \mathbf {a}$ is a scalar. Hence,
    $[{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} )]\cdot \mathbf {a} ={\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\nabla \varphi )}}~.$
Since the curl of the gradient of a scalar field is zero (recall potential theory), we have
    ${\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\nabla \varphi )}}=\mathbf {0} ~.$
Hence,
    $[{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} )]\cdot \mathbf {a} =\mathbf {0} \qquad \qquad \forall ~~\mathbf {a} ~.$
The arbitrary nature of $\mathbf {a}$ gives us
    ${{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} )=\mathbf {0} \qquad \square }$
# Micromechanics of composites/Proof 10
## Rigid body displacement field

Show that, for a rigid body motion with infinitesimal rotations, the displacement field $\mathbf {u} (\mathbf {x} )$ for can be expressed as
    $\mathbf {u} (\mathbf {x} )=\mathbf {c} +{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot \mathbf {x}$
where $\mathbf {c}$ is a constant vector and ${\boldsymbol {\omega }}$ is the infinitesimal rotation tensor.
Proof:
Note that for a rigid body motion, the strain ${\boldsymbol {\varepsilon }}$ is zero. Since
    ${\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\times {\boldsymbol {\varepsilon }}={\boldsymbol {\nabla }}{\boldsymbol {\theta }}$
we have a ${\boldsymbol {\theta }}=$ constant when ${\boldsymbol {\varepsilon }}=0$, i.e., the rotation is homogeneous.
For a homogeneous deformation, the displacement gradient is independent of $\mathbf {x}$, i.e.,
    ${\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {u} ={\frac {\partial \mathbf {u} }{\partial \mathbf {x} }}={\boldsymbol {G}}\qquad \leftarrow \qquad {\text{constant}}~.$
Integrating, we get
    $\mathbf {u} (\mathbf {x} )={\boldsymbol {G}}\cdot \mathbf {x} +\mathbf {c} ~.$
Now the strain and rotation tensors are given by
    ${\boldsymbol {\varepsilon }}={\frac {1}{2}}({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {u} +{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {u} ^{T})={\frac {1}{2}}({\boldsymbol {G}}+{\boldsymbol {G}}^{T})~;~~{\boldsymbol {\omega }}={\frac {1}{2}}({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {u} -{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {u} ^{T})={\frac {1}{2}}({\boldsymbol {G}}-{\boldsymbol {G}}^{T})~.$
For a rigid body motion, the strain ${\boldsymbol {\varepsilon }}=0$. Therefore,
    ${\boldsymbol {G}}=-{\boldsymbol {G}}^{T}\qquad \implies \qquad {\boldsymbol {\omega }}={\boldsymbol {G}}~.$
Plugging into the expression for $\mathbf {u}$ for a homogeneous deformation, we have
    ${\mathbf {u} (\mathbf {x} )={\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot \mathbf {x} +\mathbf {c} \qquad \square }$
# Micromechanics of composites/Proof 12
## Question

Let ${\boldsymbol {A}}$ and ${\boldsymbol {B}}$ be two second-order tensor fields. Let the average of any second-order tensor field (${\boldsymbol {S}}$) over the region $\Omega$ (of volume $V$) be defined as
    $\langle {\boldsymbol {S}}\rangle :={\cfrac {1}{V}}\int _{\Omega }{\boldsymbol {S}}~{\text{dV}}~.$
Show that
    $\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\cdot {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle -\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle =\langle [{\boldsymbol {A}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle ]\cdot [{\boldsymbol {B}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle ]\rangle ~.$

## Proof

Expanding out the right hand side, we have
    ${\begin{aligned}\langle [{\boldsymbol {A}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle ]\cdot [{\boldsymbol {B}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle ]\rangle &={\cfrac {1}{V}}\int _{\Omega }[{\boldsymbol {A}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle ]\cdot [{\boldsymbol {B}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle ]~{\text{dV}}\\&={\cfrac {1}{V}}\int _{\Omega }[{\boldsymbol {A}}\cdot {\boldsymbol {B}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot {\boldsymbol {B}}-{\boldsymbol {A}}\cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle +\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle ]~{\text{dV}}\\&={\cfrac {1}{V}}\int _{\Omega }{\boldsymbol {A}}\cdot {\boldsymbol {B}}~{\text{dV}}-{\cfrac {1}{V}}\int _{\Omega }\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot {\boldsymbol {B}}~{\text{dV}}-{\cfrac {1}{V}}\int _{\Omega }{\boldsymbol {A}}\cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle ~{\text{dV}}+{\cfrac {1}{V}}\int _{\Omega }\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle ~{\text{dV}}~.\end{aligned}}$
Now $\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle$ and $\langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle$ are constants with respect to the integration. Hence,
    ${\begin{aligned}\langle [{\boldsymbol {A}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle ]\cdot [{\boldsymbol {B}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle ]\rangle &={\cfrac {1}{V}}\int _{\Omega }{\boldsymbol {A}}\cdot {\boldsymbol {B}}~{\text{dV}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot \left({\cfrac {1}{V}}\int _{\Omega }{\boldsymbol {B}}~{\text{dV}}\right)-\left({\cfrac {1}{V}}\int _{\Omega }{\boldsymbol {A}}~{\text{dV}}\right)\cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle +\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle \left({\cfrac {1}{V}}\int _{\Omega }~{\text{dV}}\right)\\&=\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\cdot {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle -\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle -\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle +\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle \\&=\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\cdot {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle -\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle ~.\end{aligned}}$
Therefore,
    ${\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\cdot {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle -\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle \cdot \langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle =\langle [{\boldsymbol {A}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {A}}\rangle ]\cdot [{\boldsymbol {B}}-\langle {\boldsymbol {B}}\rangle ]\rangle \qquad \square }$
# Micromechanics of composites/Proof 4
## Question

Let $\partial {\Omega }$ be a surface. Let $\mathbf {x}$ be the position vector of points on the surface and let $\mathbf {t}$ be a vector field that are defined on $\partial {\Omega }$. If
    $\int _{\partial {\Omega }}\mathbf {x} \times \mathbf {t} ~{\text{dA}}=\mathbf {0}$
show that
    $\int _{\partial {\Omega }}\mathbf {x} \otimes \mathbf {t} ~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}\mathbf {t} \otimes \mathbf {x} ~{\text{dA}}~.$

## Proof

If we assume a Cartesian basis, we can write the given relation in index notation as
    $\int _{\partial {\Omega }}e_{ijk}~x_{j}~t_{k}~{\text{dA}}=0$
where $e_{ijk}$ is the Levi-Civita (permutation) symbol. Since $e_{ijk}$ is does not depend upon the position we can write
    $e_{ijk}\int _{\partial {\Omega }}~x_{j}~t_{k}~{\text{dA}}=0~.$
Define
    $A_{jk}:=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}x_{j}~t_{k}~{\text{dA}}~.$
Then,
    $e_{ijk}A_{jk}=0~.$
Expanding, we get
    $e_{i11}~~A_{11}+e_{i12}A_{12}+e_{i13}A_{13}+e_{i21}A_{21}+e_{i22}~~A_{22}+e_{i23}A_{23}+e_{i31}A_{31}+e_{i32}A_{32}+e_{i33}~~A_{33}=0\qquad i=1,2,3~.$
Expanding further, we get three equations
    ${\begin{aligned}e_{112}A_{12}+e_{113}A_{13}+e_{121}A_{21}+e_{123}A_{23}+e_{131}A_{31}+e_{132}A_{32}&=0\\e_{212}A_{12}+e_{213}A_{13}+e_{221}A_{21}+e_{223}A_{23}+e_{231}A_{31}+e_{232}A_{32}&=0\\e_{312}A_{12}+e_{313}A_{13}+e_{321}A_{21}+e_{323}A_{23}+e_{331}A_{31}+e_{332}A_{32}&=0\end{aligned}}$
or,
    ${\begin{aligned}e_{123}A_{23}+e_{132}A_{32}&=0\\e_{213}A_{13}+e_{231}A_{31}&=0\\e_{312}A_{12}+e_{321}A_{21}&=0\end{aligned}}$
or,
    $A_{23}=A_{32}~;~~A_{13}=A_{31}~;~~A_{12}=A_{21}~.$
Therefore,
    $\int _{\partial {\Omega }}x_{2}~t_{3}~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}x_{3}~t_{2}~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}t_{2}~x_{3}~{\text{dA}}~;~~\int _{\partial {\Omega }}x_{1}~t_{3}~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}x_{3}~t_{1}~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}t_{1}~x_{3}~{\text{dA}}~;~~\int _{\partial {\Omega }}x_{1}~t_{2}~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}x_{2}~t_{1}~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}t_{1}~x_{2}~{\text{dA}}~.$
Also, by symmetry,
    $\int _{\partial {\Omega }}x_{1}~t_{1}~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}t_{1}~x_{1}~{\text{dA}}~;~~\int _{\partial {\Omega }}x_{2}~t_{2}~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}t_{2}~x_{2}~{\text{dA}}~;~~\int _{\partial {\Omega }}x_{3}~t_{3}~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}t_{3}~x_{3}~{\text{dA}}~.$
Therefore we may write,
    $\int _{\partial {\Omega }}x_{j}~t_{k}~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}t_{j}~x_{k}~{\text{dA}}~.$
Reverting back to direct tensor notation, we get
    ${\int _{\partial {\Omega }}\mathbf {x} \otimes \mathbf {t} ~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}\mathbf {t} \otimes \mathbf {x} ~{\text{dA}}~.}$
# Micromechanics of composites/Proof 5
## Surface-volume integral relation 2

Let $\Omega$ be a body and let $\partial {\Omega }$ be its surface. Let $\mathbf {n}$ be the normal to the surface. Let $\mathbf {v}$ be a vector field on $\Omega$. Show that
    $\int _{\Omega }{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} ~{\text{dV}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}\mathbf {v} \otimes \mathbf {n} ~{\text{dA}}~.$
Proof:
Recall that
    $\int _{\partial {\Omega }}\mathbf {v} \otimes ({\boldsymbol {S}}^{T}\cdot \mathbf {n} )~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\Omega }[{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} \cdot {\boldsymbol {S}}+\mathbf {v} \otimes ({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\bullet {\boldsymbol {S}}^{T})]~{\text{dV}}$
where ${\boldsymbol {S}}$ is any second-order tensor field on $\Omega$. Let us assume that ${\boldsymbol {S}}={\boldsymbol {\mathit {1}}}$. Then we have
    $\int _{\partial {\Omega }}\mathbf {v} \otimes ({\boldsymbol {\mathit {1}}}\cdot \mathbf {n} )~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\Omega }[{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} \cdot {\boldsymbol {\mathit {1}}}+\mathbf {v} \otimes ({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\bullet {\boldsymbol {\mathit {1}}})]~{\text{dV}}$
Now,
    ${\boldsymbol {\mathit {1}}}\cdot \mathbf {n} =\mathbf {n} ~;~~{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\bullet {\boldsymbol {\mathit {1}}}=\mathbf {0} ~;~~{\boldsymbol {A}}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\mathit {1}}}={\boldsymbol {A}}$
where ${\boldsymbol {A}}$ is any second-order tensor. Therefore,
    $\int _{\partial {\Omega }}\mathbf {v} \otimes \mathbf {n} ~{\text{dA}}=\int _{\Omega }{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} ~{\text{dV}}~.$
Rearranging,
    ${\int _{\Omega }{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {v} ~{\text{dV}}=\int _{\partial {\Omega }}\mathbf {v} \otimes \mathbf {n} ~{\text{dA}}\qquad \square }$
# System development/Domains

In learning project domains you can find information about (process)domains.

## Index

* Analysis
* Overview
* Plan
* To-do
# System development/Domains/Analysis
## Index

* To-do
* Best practices
# System development/Domains/Overview/Asset management
## Index

* Best practices
* Business objectives
* Case studies
* Ontology
* Processes
* Software
* Subdomains
* To-do
* Vision
# System development/Domains/Overview/Asset management/Ontology
## Concepts

* Asset
* AssetCategory
* AssetRequest
* Costcenter
* Owner
* User
# System development/Domains/Overview/CRM

CRM stands for Customer Relationship Management.

## Index

* Best practices
* Business objectives
* Case studies
* Ontology
* Processes
* Software
* Subdomains
* To-do
* Vision
# System development/Domains/Overview

In this learning project we want to share information about developments in process- and business domains.

## Process domains

* Asset management
* Case management
* Communication
* Contract management
* CRM
* Customer service
* Delivery
* HCM
* Facility management
* Innovation
* ITIL
* Logistics
* Learning
* Procurement
* Project management
* Marketing
* Sales
* Task management
* Time registration
* Service support
* Webshop

## Business domains

* Finance
* Health
* Retail
* Telecom
# System development/Domains/Overview/CRM/Ontology
## Concepts

* Account
* Accountmanager
* Call
* Customer
* Meeting
* Opportunity
* Organization
* Prospect
* Request
** Request for info
** Request for proposal
* SalesActivity
* SalesActivityType
* SalesRepresentative
* Task
# Making HTTP requests
## Learning goals
## Script

explain the use of telnet as a tool to establish a TCP connection (also show wireshark network traffic?)
talk about the fact that http is a request response protocol and stateless
(show response)
(show response)
# HTTP header
## Learning goals
## Script

Web Science/Part1: Foundations of the web/Hypertext Transfer Protocol/HTTP header/script
# Summary, further reading, homework
## Learning goals
## Script

Web Science/Part1: Foundations of the web/Hypertext Transfer Protocol/Summary, further reading, homework/script
# Web Science/Part1: Foundations of the web/Internet Architecture/Domain Name System/Summary, Further readings, Homework/table

| Student | Comparison of addressing schemes | reviewed by | Drawbacks of DNS | reviewed by | 3 interesting facts from the Interview | reviewed by |
| | | fill me in | example link | fill me in | example link | fill me in |
| Rene Pickhardt | essay1 | fill me in | essay2 | fill me in | essay3 | fill me in |
| Onse | table1 | Arefin | essay1 | Pavi | essay2 | fill me in |
| Roman Sokolov | comparison table | Onse, Roman Sokolov | Some drawbacks of DNS | Maximilian Weishaupt | 4 interestings facts | Rouslan, Jane Kruchinina |
| Maximilian Weishaupt | Addressing Schemata | open | Essay 2 | open | Philosophical Reflections | open |
| Sergey Dedukh | fill me in | fill me in | fill me in | fill me in | essay | Onse, Jane Kruchinina |
| Jane Kruchinina | 1st essay | Onse, Roman Sokolov | 2nd essay | fill me in | 3rd essay | Arefin, Roman Sokolov |
| Rouslan Kvashchanka | table | Maximilian Weishaupt | 2nd essay | fill me in | 3rd essay | Pavi |
| Sajidur Rahman | tableOne | fill me in | essayOne | Rouslan | "fill in" | fill me in |
| Yuan | Table | Roman Sokolov | #2 essay | Jane Kruchinina | #3 essay | Maximilian Weishaupt |
| Anurag | Essay1 | Rouslan | Essay2 | fill me in | Essay3 | fill me in |
| Arefin | Comparison of DNS-IP-MAC | "fill me in" | Pros and Cons of DNS | "fill me in" | Interesting Facts | "fill me in" |
| Paarth | Addressing Schemes | fill me in | DNS Drawbacks | fill me in | Intresting facts about Video | fill me in |
| Rahul Arora | Comparison | fill me in | DNS Drawbacks Essay | fill me in | 3 Intresting facts about Video | fill me in |
| Miriam | Table | Pavi | - | fill me in | - | fill me in |
| David | fill me in | fill me in | Drawbacks DNS | fill me in | - | fill me in |
| Aida | essay1 | fill me in | essay2 | / | 3 Intresting facts about Video | fill me in |
| Pavi | Addressing Schemes | Check it out! | Advantages and disadvantages of DNS | Arefin | Interesting facts from the video | Check it out! |
# Web Science/Part1: Foundations of the web/Hypertext Transfer Protocol/Making HTTP requests/script

explain the use of telnet as a tool to establish a TCP connection (also show wireshark network traffic?)
talk about the fact that http is a request response protocol and stateless
(show response)
(show response)
# Web Science/Part1: Foundations of the web/Internet Architecture

* PART1: Week1: Ethernet · Internet Protocol · Week2: Transmission Control Protocol · Domain Name System · Week3: Internet vs world wide web · HTTP · Week4: Web Content · Dynamic Web Content
* PART2: Week5: How big is the Web? · Descriptive Web Models · Week6: Advanced Statistic Models · Modelling Similarity · Week7: Generative Modelling of the Web · Graph theoretic Web Modelling
* PART3: Week8 : Investigating Meme Spreading · Herding Behaviour · Week9: Online Advertising · User Modelling
* PART4: Week10 : Copyright · Net neutrality · Week11: Internet governance · Privacy
The complete Internet protocol suite is open. The goal of the following lessons is to understand the Internet Protocol Suite with its 4 layers commonly known as TCP/IP Protocol family. Completing the Block on Internet Architecture you will
* understand the design principles of the web (decentrality, openness and interoperability)
* understand the internet protocoll suite
* know at least one protocol from each layer of the internet protocol suite (Ethernet, IP, TCP, DNS)
* have a basic understanding on how internet service providers operate
The following courses on Wikiversity could also be helpful for you:
* computer networks
* Internet Protocol Analysis (really nice overviews and already study questions!)
Go to the second Block: Web Architecture