OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# War Seminar/Art and War

This is a learn by doing project where Wikiversity participants explore how war is depicted in art and the roles that artistic depictions of war play in society.

## Guernica

In her book Art and war, Laura Brandon described Pablo Picasso's painting Guernica as perhaps the twentieth century's "most powerful anti-war statement" (Introduction, page 2).

### Learn by doing

Perform a w:Google image search for "Guernica". How many "Guernica" images are on the internet?

## Photojournalism

Photos of dead American soldiers were published for the first time during World War II in Life magazine at the urging of President Roosevelt who feared that the American public was growing complacent about the toll of war. The U.S. government had prevented publication of such photographs during the early months of the war fearing that it would be too demoralizing to the public. This is in contrast to photos of enemy casualties which were regularly published before this ban was lifted.
Compare the publication of the Battle of Buna-Gona photos in Life magazine to the controversy over the publication of photographs of flag-draped coffins of American military personnel killed in action.
Contrast these journalistic photos to the depictions of war in art on this page and elswhere.
How do you feel about the publication of images such as these? How do the views expressed at The PG-Rated War and From the Archive: Not New, Never Easy compare to your thoughts?

## Perspectives on War
### Learn by doing

Find pairs of works of art that depict a war or battle from the perspectives of two different combatants. If possible, add images of these works of art to this page.
Describe how the two depictions differ.

## External Links

* Google Map of Battle Sites: valor and carnage expressed in paintings Zoom in on the famous paintings and battle scenes.
* Google Map of Le Train: The Rescuing of the German-Looted French Art Train
* Military art at Wikipedia
# Wastewater treatment

Part of the Wikiversity Department of Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and the Engineering and Technology Portal

## Content summary

Herein we first explore the subject of wastewater, focusing on the physical characteristics and the natural processes involved. Then we apply these studies to the engineering of devices to remediate the waste.

## Goals

To further knowledge of wastewater within the engineering environment and to enable the practitioner to effectively design within the parameters of such.

## Learning Materials
### Texts

* General Biology; Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection
* Cell Biology; Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection
* Biochemistry; Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection
* General Chemistry; Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection
* General Chemistry; Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection

### Wastewater Treatment Engineering Lessons

* Characteristics of Wastewater
* Temperature
* Density
* Salinity
* Chemistry

## Assignments
### Study guide:

* Physical Properties of the Oceans
* Wikipedia article:Temperature
* Wikipedia article:Density
* Wikipedia article:Salinity
* Wikipedia article:Chemistry
# War Seminar/Roadmaps to peace

Do you know the atomic strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II which ended this war? If so, how did the Japanese occupation at Malaya (now Malaysia) surrenders as a roadmap to peace? Bryan See 04:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
# War Seminar/Terrorism and war

What, if any, are the differences between intimidation perpetrated by big governments and armies to achieve specific political purposes and terrorism perpetrated by individuals or smaller organizations to do the same? Mirwin 06:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Although I'd like to agree that there are few differences between these two possibly organized crimes, however, governments is a vague term considering that there are so many different kinds of government. Those that are chosen by the people for the people, or at least attempt to be so chosen, are not out to "seek and destroy." While some governments as history and present day prove are out to "seek and destroy," and I'll agree that there is little difference between these governments and any group that promotes organized terrorism or crime. Thankfully there are organizations such as the UN that unite the "good-guys" to help prevent too much destruction. --Dancewiththewind 16:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
    At what price too little destruction? Consider the economic exploitation of resources in Africa and Labor in China, India, etc. while hundreds of millions if not billions of people are undercapitlized the capital that exists only purpose in life is to extract a greater toll on economic activities. It seems a little destruction here and there might serve the same purpose as the American Revolution ... getting foreigners off people's backs. 71.161.8.137 08:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
       This seems to be more of a debate than an article, perhaps this belongs in the discussion area? Or maybe we could use a wikiversity place thingy for debate? Anyway, as my two bits seem to feel left out...
       Terror and intimidation have been present in some form or another since the beginning of interpersonal relationships. Their use on a large scale since the inception of war. Read Sun Tzu, if you dare to tell me that demoralizing an enemy group or populous for the sake of victory is not terrorism, I'll want some good argument.
       Probably most pressing is the distinction between acceptable and unacceptable terrorism. In the last millenia it has become something of taboo among "civilized" nations to attack non-combatants. However, anything other than "total" war has always been something of a lie and I view terrorism as a modern day equivalent of pillaging the countryside in lieu of attacking fortified centres. -KyranTyr
# Wikimedia Ethics/Audio/Transcripts

All participants are invited to answer these questions. The goal is to also have a recoded discussion session, but text only is also welcome.
1) What do you hope the project can accomplish? 2) What ethics/management issues are you particularly concerned about? 3) do you think this kind of project can help Wikimedians find ways to improve Wikipedia?

## User:Moulton

listen

### 1) What do you hope the project can accomplish?

    a) Raise awareness of ethical issues and the need to evolve from current practices to more ethical practices, a never ending progression. We are enroute to the elusive and asymptotic goal of ethical best practices.
    b) Improve the general level of scholarship among those who elect to participate in the learning project on Wikiversity. Its not just about improving Wikipedia, it is also about encouraging and helping people to become better scholars and better thinkers.

### 2) What ethics/management issues are you particularly concerned about?

    I'm concerned about the existing Regulatory Policies and Practices at Wikipedia and the sister projects. These range from lamentably dysfunctional to discouragingly unjust to atrociously corrupt. Many of these erratic and dysfunctional self-governance practices manifest themselves in the context of the BLP Problem (Biographies of Living Persons) as documented by Doc Glasgow and commented on by NewYorkBrad and many others.

### 3) Do you think this kind of project can help Wikimedians find ways to improve Wikipedia?

    Yes, it will help individual learners find ways, but it's not clear that enough individuals will learn enough to make a difference with respect to Wikipedia. But I have little doubt it will help those who wish to learn how to reason more deeply about ethical issues and ethical conundrums. Its anybody's guess if those individuals can make a difference on Wikipedia.

## User:Salmon of Doubt
### 1) What do you hope the project can accomplish?

    Provide a guide for participants on wikipedia for how to best navigate various situations.

### 2) What ethics/management issues are you particularly concerned about?

    I'm particularly concerned with problems surrounding the "free speech" vs "disruptive behavior" - how can editors and more importantly adminstrators deal with users who are either acting in difficult-to-spot bad faith (subtle vandalism, trolling) or in good faith but unhelpful to the goal of providing an encyclopedia (supporters of pathological science, self-promoters) ethically and efficiently.

### 3) Do you think this kind of project can help Wikimedians find ways to improve Wikipedia?

    This kind of project? Yes, absolutly. However, this actual project, compromised, as it is, by most of it's contributing members being "good faith but unhelpful" on wikipedia, is unlikley to be useful except as a source of emotional release for it's members and a source of schadenfreude for others.

## Related Resources

* Ethical Management of the English Language Wikipedia/Audio
* Teamspeak
# Wikimedia Ethics
## Welcome

Please make sure you have reviewed the page What is Wikiversity? before you participate and contribute to this project.

## What are ethics?

Ethics are moral standards of conduct agreed upon to define right and wrong. That which is ethical is considered morally correct. That which is unethical is considered morally wrong. Ethics are usually considered in a professional code of conduct as a qualified professional is under more expection than an unqualified individual to have a learned understanding of the accepted principles of right and wrong.

## Learning ethics in online media

Principles of ethics in online media is the scope for this resource; however, this resource draws upon comparisons that center on the English Wikipedia, which has over a quarter-million biographies of living persons (BLPs) as well as many articles that characterize people, organizations, events, and other aspects of human activity. The degree to which the content and practices of Wikimedia projects adhere to commonly recognized principles of ethics, which include such comparisons of Wikipedia, are what this resource examines.
Temporary guideline: This project currently does not accept case studies of living people until further notice.

## List of subpages

* All subpages: special:prefixindex/Wikimedia Ethics/
* All talk subpages: special:prefixindex/Talk:Wikimedia Ethics/
* All recently edited pages: Dynamic page list

## Resource Management

* Audio
** Audio/Transcripts
* Brainstorming
* Participants and objectives
* Project Timetable
* User:Privatemusings/EthicsSandbox - a personal sandbox space in which all are welcome to try and help energise this project.

## Learning resources

* Introduction
* Overview
* Change BLP policy
* Ethical Code for Wikipedians
* Ethics on Wikipedia and the Internet
* Fundamentals of ethics
* List of questions
* Response Testing on WMF projects
* Social contract
* Paid editing and Wikipedia Zero
* Suggested essays

## How to improve this resource

* Identify principles for objective evaluation
* Evaluate Wikimedia systems
* Identify what needs to be learned by the community
* Create or update collaborative research pages and workshops
# Wikimedia Ethics/Case Studies/Biographies of Living People
## Note

    This page was created with contents from Case Studies1 (which was originally named "/Case Studies"). This page should be expand to be more specific about what problems or issues exist with Biographies of Living People, as well as suggestions for addressing them.

## Biographies of Living People

A neutral Wikipedia editor asked Moulton to provide information, and sources to support the claim in the Rosalind Picard Wikipedia article that she supported Intelligent Design. Moulton believes that the Rosalind Picard article misrepresents what Rosalind Picard believes. Moulton claims to have personal knowledge of the individual, and states that the article misrepresents what the individual believes. Wikipedia's policy on original research prevents changes from being made without reliable sources. Some people believe if Rosalind Picard were to directly complain to Wikipedia, changes would likely be made, but believe she has not yet made a direct complaint. Moulton believes that Rosalind Picard has directly complained about her article.
Here is the evidence and information Moulton provided:
After reviewing the above, Moulton's correspondent replied:
Moulton responded:
* See also: Moulton, JWSchmidt's investigation, an attempt to understand this case.
In particular, take note of this on her own biography:
   IP Edit Summaries
   * 23:20, February 4, 2007 (hist) (diff) Rosalind Picard ‎ (focus on the entry)
   * 23:19, February 4, 2007 (hist) (diff) Rosalind Picard ‎ (the deleted material has nothing to do with the person in the entry)
   * 22:35, June 29, 2006 (hist) (diff) Rosalind Picard ‎ ("anti-evol" is POV of the writer. the organizers of the petition support many aspects of evolution such as microevolution so to label it anti-evolution is an attempt to sell more newspapers)
   * 23:29, April 27, 2006 (hist) (diff) Rosalind Picard ‎ (Read the petition. Calling it anti-evolution is not accurate, even if the NYT tried to label it that way.)
   * 23:24, April 27, 2006 (hist) (diff) Rosalind Picard ‎ (→Intelligent Design Support: The petition does NOT say anything about intelligent design. Read the petition.)
   * 00:21, March 31, 2006 (hist) (diff) Rosalind Picard ‎ (→Showing Skepticism and Asking for Critical Examination of Evidence)
   * 15:28, March 13, 2006 (hist) (diff) Rosalind Picard ‎ (→Showing Skepticism and Asking for More Critical Examination of the Evidence)
The above edit summaries make it abundantly clear that Picard's on-wiki complaint (spanning 11 months from March 2006 to February 2007) coincides in substance and detail with Moulton's complaint (spanning 13 months from August 2007 to September 2008), that the Picard BLP erroneously connects her (and the notorious petition) to Intelligent Design, and fails to explain the 2001 pre-publication petition, as circulated in private email among academics, to be a sincere and sober call for rigorous adherence to the protocols of the Scientific Method when examining the evidence for any theory.
# Wikimedia Ethics/Audio

One strategy for organizing and summarizing progress on the Ethical Management of the English Language Wikipedia project is to make audio sessions. You can participate just in text also.

## Recorded discussion session

All participants in the Ethical Management of the English Language Wikipedia project are invited to a discussion, "Introduction to the Ethical Management of the English Language Wikipedia project". The plan is to use Teamspeak to allow us to record the discussion. Other audio contributions are welcome. For example, if you cannot use Teamspeak, feel free to use Skype or any other means to record your comments. We can get everyone's answers to the 3 questions (see below) and then try to have a group discussion.
Questions:
   * What do you hope the project can accomplish?
   * What ethics/management issues are you particularly concerned about?
   * do you think this kind of project can help Wikimedians find ways to improve Wikipedia?

### Participants

please list yourself below and indicate good and bad times for the discussion.
    JWSchmidt, best time window: Aug. 25-30, 4:00-10:00 and 16:00-22:00 UTC+0
    Cormaggio - hope to record on August 27 during the 16:00-22:00 UTC+0 time window
    please add yourself

## Completed Recordings

* Problems playing the files? See media help.

## Related

* original sign-up on talk page
# Zombie Response

The Zombie Response project is an initiative of the Community Health team, to devise information and educational resources for public health interventions that manage and protect communities from health epidemics. It is felt that the popular fiction of zombies provides a number of opportunities for considering many angles of public health, from understanding viruses, physiology and epidemiology, through to mental health and a range of social issues.

## Topics

Suggested range of topics to be established...
* Zombie Response test
* Public health, pandemics and epidemics
* What are zombies
* Zombies as symbolism for public health
* Zombie-like health concerns
* Public health responses to zombie pandemics and epidemics
# Αγάπη
## Λεξικόν: κοινωνία • ἐκκλησία • αγάπη • φιλία • στοργή • ερως • θέλημα

So many people are lost and confused about the wonderful and simple message of the New Testament. A good way to develop an understanding is to look for key concepts that are easy to grasp. These build context when organized into a lexicon (Λεξικόν). Things like community, church, love, brotherhood and family are starting points. αγάπη (uh-gop-ee) is a Greek word whose meaning is nearly lost.

## Upon this rock...

God is αγάπη.
(John 13:34)

## Other instances

ἐκκλησία = κοινωνία + αγάπη
Affection - φιλία

## Notes, References and External links

Strong's number: 25 - αγάπη
* OliveTree search term:love
# Κοινωνία
## Λεξικόν: κοινωνία • ἐκκλησία • αγάπη • φιλία • στοργή • ερως • θέλημα

So many people are lost and confused about the wonderful and simple message of the New Testament. A good way to dive in is to look for key concepts that are easy to grasp and plug the main terms into a lexicon (Λεξικόν). Things like community, church, love, brotherhood and family are starting points. κοινωνία (koin-o-ni-a) is perhaps one of the most mistranslated words in the common English versions of the New Testament.

## John's Epistle

κοινωνία is a principle applied to deep communal sharing. A stunning passage that demonstrates this principle is the opening section of John's first general letter (I John 1). He uses the first person plural "we" referring to the fact that Peter, James and he saw something on that mountain top. (Matthew 17:1-9, Mark 9:1-10, Luke 9:28-36). This letter was written long after James has been killed, but John is being inclusive of other eyewitnesses to a myriad of additional remarkable events including the ascension and the subsequent miraculous manifestations of healing and deliverance. By verse three he has included the rest of the ἐκκλησία (the called out) of his day and is including even us - the readers - into the collective for a purpose...
Then in verse three he states the remarkable purpose for writing the general epistle:
The Greek phrase for "our joy" doesn't connote simply himself, his co-authors and the assembly of the believers of his day. It is an extremely plural second person inclusion meaning "our collective joy" - Peter, James, John, and the other eight, The Seventy, The First Century Church, The Seven Churches, The Father, The Son, you and me. "Our joy may be made full" in the Ancient Greek language has not yet been fully translated into English. This expansion of context comes from the true meaning of an Ancient Greek word translated into English as "fellowship" - κοινωνία.
Modern usage of the word "fellowship" especially in a "church" setting has been reduced to getting together once or twice a week to listen to some guy "preach" and then maybe have sandwiches and coffee downstairs in the "fellowship hall". This meaning is no where close to κοινωνία in the context of communion and oneness.

## Other instances

The greek word κοινωνία has been translated to:
* fellowship
* conversation
* communication
* communion
* citizenship
Next ἐκκλησία

## Notes, References and External links

Strong's number: 2842 - κοινωνία
* OliveTree search term:fellowship
# Zoology

Zoology is the branch of biology that studies the animal kingdom, including the structure, embryology, evolution, classification, habits, and distribution of all animals, both living and extinct, and how they interact with their ecosystems.

## Resources

* Animal Phyla

## See Also

* School: Zoology
* Category: Zoology
# Zodiac sign

Zodiac, in astronomy and astrology, a belt around the heavens extending 9° on either side of the ecliptic, the plane of Earth’s orbit and of the Sun’s apparent annual path. The orbits of the Moon and of the principal planets also lie entirely within the zodiac. The 12 astrological signs of the zodiac are each considered to occupy 1/12 (or 30°) of its great circle. These signs no longer correspond to the astronomical constellations in which the Sun actually appears. The constellations are irregular in size and shape, and the Sun regularly passes through one constellation (Ophiuchus) that is not considered a member of the zodiac.
Because most of the constellations through which the ecliptic passes represent animals, the ancient Greeks called its zone zōdiakos kyklos, “circle of animals,” or ta zōdia, “the little animals.” The size and number of zodiacal constellations varied in antiquity and became fixed only with the development of mathematical astronomy. The list below gives the constellations of the zodiac, with the dates of the Sun’s passage through them in the era when their boundaries were fixed. These dates are still used for the astrological signs, though precession of the equinoxes has shifted the constellations eastward; e.g., on January 1 the direction of the sun is now in Sagittarius instead of Capricorn. The history of the symbols is unknown; they seem to appear first in Greek manuscripts of the late Middle Ages.
# Zines

Zines are small circulation, non-commercial publications that are printed by their creators on a topic of their choice. They come in all shapes and sizes from personal zine, artzines, zines about music and politics, fanzines. Zines are straight from the writer to the reader: raw, uncut and handmade.
Since the invention of the printing press (if not before), dissidents and marginalized citizens have published their own opinions in leaflet and pamphlet form.

## Task

Yr 10 English Homework Task: Your task over the next 2 weeks at home is to produce 2 items for a zine that we will produce as a class. Imagine you are a marginalized citizen in Fahrenheit 451 like Montag, or Faber, or Granger etc . Use the zine to express your thoughts, concerns, desires. This ‘underground’ zine is for distribution to those who are left living on the outskirts of the city in Fahrenheit 451. What would you like to tell them? Would you like to educate them about something? Or simply make sure they remember a wonderful book from time. Create 2 items to include in the zine. Your name does not have to be published with them if you like. You may like to write a short story, a poem, a song, draw a comic, design a picture, retell an historical event, educate your reader in some way. It is up to you. Submit your 2 items by the end of Week 6.
For more info on Zines and links, look at:

## How to make a zine

Youtube video: DIY - How to Make a Zine; Paper, Scissors, Pen - Rockin! by SamProof
# Φιλία
## Λεξικόν: κοινωνία • ἐκκλησία • αγάπη • φιλία • στοργή • ερως • θέλημα

So many people are lost and confused about the wonderful and simple message of the New Testament. A good way to develop an understanding is to look for key concepts that are easy to grasp. These build context when organized into a lexicon (Λεξικόν). Things like community, church, love, brotherhood and family are starting points. φιλία (filia or filao) is an important Greek word.

## Peter's 7-step program

Seven steps to αγάπη.
(II Peter 1:5-7)

## Other instances

ἐκκλησία = κοινωνία + αγάπη
faith, virtue, knowledge, temperance, patience, godliness, brotherly affection (φιλία-delphia), love (αγάπη)
Affection - φιλία

## Notes, References and External links

Strong's number: 3588 - φιλία
* OliveTree search term:brotherly love
# University of Florida/Egm6341

EGM 6341: Numerical Methods of Engineering Analysis I
Finite-difference calculus; interpolation and extrapolation; roots of equations; solution of algebraic equations; eigenvalue problems; least-squares method; quadrature formulas; numerical solution of ordinary differential equations; methods of weighted residuals. Use of digital computer.

## Subpages

Special:Prefixindex/University of Florida/Egm6341/