OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Typography/Jan Tschichold

Jan Tschichold was one of the foremost typographers of the twentieth century. The son of a German signwriter, he played a key role in defining and propagandising modern typographic principles. He pioneered the systematic combination of photography with text for graphic impact. Tschichold was notable throughout his life for formulating general rules and guidance for quality standards based on a profound historical and skill based knowledge of script, lettering, type technology and the arts of book production.
A full list of his achievements would include: His teaching; his collection and dissemination of the best examples of work by his avante-garde peers, his manifesto, The New Typography, his own creative work in posters, books, his body of writings on typography, the Penguin Composition Rules which had a historic impact in raising the quality of book production, post Second World War, his pioneering work for emerging type technologies.
A master of traditional historical design style, while also a proponent of modernist design principles, he left a legacy which still contributes to the teaching of the highest quality of humanist production values and the avant garde exploration of design in communicating social progress.
Many typographers and graphic designers regard him as the greatest typographer of the twentieth century and in key respects a founder and champion of the professional practise of graphic design.
Tschichold, Mclean, Burke, Hollis
TimMartin 09:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Tim Martin
# University of Canberra/RCC2010/Participants

* Leighblackall 03:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
* Robinmcconnell 07:48, 16 July 2010 (UTC) UCNISS
* James Neill, Lecturer, Centre for Applied Psychology, University of Canberra - until 2.30pm
* Margaret O'Connell - CIT
* Kerrie Doyle, Lecturer, Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra
* Margaret Robson - CIT
* Robert Fitzgerald - Dean - Education (Research), Faculty of Education, University of Canberra
* Michael de Percy - Broadbanding the Nation
* Dr Bob Jansen - Cancer Council of Australia I am a private consultant to the Cancer Council and am interested in using wiki technology to foster collaboration between people at a distance
* Paul Harvey - Taxonomy Research & Information Network informatics
* Alice Winter-Irving - Cancer Council Australia
* Christine Vuletich - Cancer Council Australia
* Marina Lobastov - ANU
* Graeme Bartlett a Wikipedia editor
* Joelle Vandermensbrugghe, Research Services Office, UC
* Marghanita da Cruz, Ramin Communications Pty Ltd, Local Community Engagement 2.0 (will be arriving in the afternoon)
* Kirsty Sharp, Tasmanian Polytechnic Wiki Projects
* Andrew Garrett, Wikimedia Foundation
* Tony Krone - University of Canberra
* Mark Spain - UC Organisation Development
* Peter Shanks - Skills Tasmania
* Ben Rattray UCNISS
* Rose Grozdanic - Australian Flexible Learning Framework
* Nerida Hart - Australian River Restoration Centre
* Sue Hollands - ACODE, TLC, University of Canberra
* Lauren Kane- Educational Developer, Australian National University
* Lulu Turner, Business &Government/HDR, University of Canberra
* Leonard Low - University of Canberra, Teaching & Learning Centre
* Lubna Alam - UC
* Alan Arnold - UC Teaching & Learning Centre
# University of Canberra/RCC2010/Wikis for Community Consultation

Hoping to get to the conference by 3pm, I would be interested in a discussion about using Wikis for Community Consultation and Event Planning and Co-ordination. SLUG has been exploring the latter. Not everyone (all the speakers) seem to be able/want to play the Wiki game.
# University of Canberra/RCC/Navigation

* About | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
# University of Canberra/RCC2010/Conversations behind wikis

Dynamics of identities and anonimity in open collaboartions like Wikipedia.
Can't ignore the cultural lens through which we critique this activity.
Example of Kate Lundy attempting to develop policy in an open forum using a wiki - does it work (did it?)...See for yourself public-sphere-2-open-government-policy-and-practice
Gruen Nation, Yes We Canberra and lampooning tweets - turning the mirror back on us - what are the Rules of Engagement around open media/collaboration and are we talking about these rules in a critical frame, especially with learners??
Are we aware of our environments? Including our digital environments...
Mark - listening is a skillful act to take on board something someone has said and responding and feeding it back - call for different rules in terms of this space for learning. Do we need to establish a track record especally in the online space(s)?
Bob - in one wiki, users don't want to see their work against something they think is 'crap' (unvalidated)...
Andrew - "reflect" - original comment is split with an ajax summary on left side. (Uni of Washington) Ref. Liquid threads...
In the accreditation space what does it mean for open education resources AND open collaboration?
Moving to thinking about validating and evidence-based processes for assuring the legitimacy of learners as workers and citizens in digital age.
The VET sector and the industry skills councils may not necessarily be representing the sector and its real needs. Could the open model work in establishing wiki based dialogue to maintain currency of compentencies in VET. - Is there a role for Wikis in improving the currency of Curriculum?
Looking at grassroots wikis to learn from their development, rather than looking at Wikipedia as an example to hold a mirror to - there's not much realistaion about the years of work behind Wikipedia, so we need to look closer to home if we want to establish real wiki activity...!
What is the role of Institutions and Academics in Universal Curriculum. Example Tom Worthington's Green ICT e-learning course available through multiple institutions.
Reputation, Status defending contribution to a Comprehensive Universal Curriculum. Mobile Learning vs E-Learning, Nurses Curriculum
Safe stuff on Wiki - Controversial issues raised on discussion pages
Positioning Wikis in Academia - why should academics contribute?
Examples from Wikipedia:
* In Flux: Steve Irwin dies and Julia Guillard replaces Kevin Rudd as Australian PM
* Credibility/Authority of Content of Wikipedia/References/Sources - Transpiration
* Different Angles on Governance of IT - Wikipedia:AS8015-2005 Australian Standard for Corporate Governance of ICT Wikipedia: ICT Governance Wikipedia: Information Technology Governance Wikipedia: ISO38500-2008 International Standard for Corporate Governance of IT
# University of Canberra/RCC2011/Open Educational Resources

Recording of an un-conference session at the Recent Changes Camp 2011 held in Canberra .

## Recordings

* Audio in MP3 - 1 hour
* Talking VTE Podcast
* iTunes

## Participants

* Stephan Ridgway
* Robyn Jay ]
* Michael Coghlan
* Tom Worthington
* Leigh Blackall
* Rose Grozdanic
* Adam Jenkins
* Kirsty Sharp
* Jutta van Dincklage

## Tagged Resources

Each episode of Talking VTE has it's own unique tag which we use to share resources relevant to the episode. Below are links tagged in with talkingvte28 which are relevant to this session. If you want to share some resources with the participants prior to the session or the audience after it's distribution you can join the diigo group and add to the resources.
# University of Canberra/RCC2010/Wikiversity

James, Joelle, Marg, Peter, Mark, Leigh
From our small group discussion, key points were:
* James explained some of the administrative dramas that Wikiversity has faced recently.
* How to work with Moodle and Wikiversity?
** Moodle should be called a Class Management System - because it is useful for managing a formal education class, and calling thus would free up content on the open internet. Moodle then becomes like a 'class start page' pointing out to activites and resources out on the internet, and using the useful features of Moodle for class management (assignments, tracking, private discussions). Critical to this, is not to turn Moodle into a content "dump" of social media coming in, but to go out into the "field" and participate.
** But where are teachers generally at with reaching into the open internet? Working on the fly, they focus on delivery of content, without making people stakeholders in their learning process, aside from assessment drivers.
* How can we look more outwardly? Consider how learning takes place informally on Wikiversity (and other social media channels), and reflect back on why it does or doesn't take place in more formal settings?
* In James' experience, the 'students' can become active in these spaces (see User:Jtneill/Teaching).
* Wikiversity, and other socal media, gives us the opportunity to add value to assessment tasks.
* Another use for wikiversity: negotiate the curriculum and assessment - Put course syllabus, assessment tasks, rubric/marking criteria development etc. on a wiki for discussion, modification and validation by 'students'.
* How do we ensure secure and private learning spaces = options: use moodle, explain and use avatars, generalisation of information
* We shouldn't use our own wikis generally, because the community of practice takes so long to develop on a global scale. We should use established/ing wikis such as Wikiversity.
* Institutions should contribute their funds into the established projects, such as Wikiversity supported by the Wikimedia Foundation.
* Bookmodule has been added to Wikiversity, and enables collection of articles into PDF and pediapress book printing.
# University of Canberra/RCC2011/All about Appropedia

Few rules, let it emerge
Extending the likes of Wikipedia. WP has no How-To, so Apropedia does that.
http://www.appropedia.org/
Appropedia channel on YouTube
A YouTube video about Appropedia; not part of this session, but good background material.
# University of Canberra/RCC2011/All about Wikitravel

The wikiTravel session was attended by several people including Mark Dilley, Laura Hale, John Vandenberg, Jutta, Jani Patokallio and Ken Hoetmer.
wikiTravel is owned by a used car dealership. They are not focused on updating the existing software, developing improvements or building community. They care that they make money on the Google ads. This means they have little stake in the development of the community on the wiki.
This session ended up becoming a question of could wikiTravel fork and asking a broader question of what is needed to successfully fork.
One opinion in this session was that you needed four successful components to fork: A tech person, a person to network and rally the community around the need to move, a person to handle promotion and SEO, and another person to help with content development at the new location.
One of the forks that was looked at was wikiFur. It successfully left Wikia. The issue with wikiFur is that they actually controlled the domain. Wikis like Uncyclopedia cannot easily fork because they do not control the domain. In the case of wikiTravel, forking would also be difficult because they don't control the domain or the trademark. The community would need to effectively rebrand. This is possible as the German and Italians have created a successful fork of wikiTravel in their own language, called Wikivoyage. (see here for their account of this fork)
We tried to come up with examples of successful forks. One successful fork mentioned was Conservapedia.
wikiHow was discussed. The founder, Jack Herrick, has told his community that they have a right to fork if they want to.
A lot of people don't fork because they are scared to do so. Success is clearly defined and wrapped up in their current project. Leaving is very scary.
There are a lot of complications on the technical end with trying to fork, such as bring the history of all the articles with it the history of the chat. It would probably take a good technical person three weeks to figure out and implement a technical solution to moving all the content over and trying to get the user database possibly moved over and trying to address the issue such as media needing to be copied over.
# University of Canberra/RCC2011/Going forward: Future wiki conferences

RecentChangesCamp 2011 Canberra closed with a discussion on what we will do going forward as a result of this, how we were empowered and how we can share our learning. This involved discussing several ideas:
* Trying to have more Wiki Academies around Australia;
* Having a one day RecentChangesCamp in New Zealand, possibly in June or July of 2011. The focus would be on attracting a group more interested in research than in education, but all people interested in wikis would still invited. (The premise was also that RCC in Australia would be more education oriented. The USA would be more commercial wiki users oriented.) The goal would be to build the infrastructure community network wise so that a three day RecentChangesCamp could be held in New Zealand in 2012. People at the conference thought Wellington would be a good location to have it as it is centrally located. It would not take more than three weeks to organize and promote once a venue was found. Laura Hale volunteered to facilitate in order to insure continuity.
* A discussion was had about trying to reach out to MPs to help push the idea of using collaborative practices as part of open governance. This might be realized either through a formal conference or possibly through Wiki Academies.
* A conference proposal was put forth about having a standard academic wiki conference with a focus on doing research on best practices on wikis. Methodology would be really important. Paper presentation would be open to everyone and it would be structured more like a post-graduate conference. People would have the opportunity to have their research subjected to a double blind peer-review. This conference would likely be held in Adelaide as the proposal was put forward by some one from Adelaide. It would also introduce people to ethics review. An attempt could be made to try the peer reviewed practice on Wikiversity as a test to how feasible this was. If that doesn't occur on Wikiversity, it could be tried on a locked wiki. The conference would be about Critical improvement, not criticism.
* An event in Newcastle around w:This Is Not Art-festival. Possibly a one day RCC type event, as many of the people who attend are very creative who might be extremely willing to engage in the wiki community if they are approached.
Beyond the planning of events such as these, we discussed how we were all ambassadors for wikis and the collaborative learning community. When we returned home, we were encouraged to continue our activism and to share what we learned.
# University of Canberra/RCC2011/Let's reverse-brainstorm: Why wikis don't work

* people have different goals & in a wiki people have to collaborate & they do it better on their own
* too hard to use (info architecture, structuring)
* we don’t have the skills
* ugly
* Unreliable technology
* People won’t agree
* it is public, the permanency frightens people & functions
* WE have enough info out there (google)
* too much time, too busy, sb else can do it
* wikis are messy
* what’s the point if it gets changed anyway
* lack of facilitation
* people want control over content, they want power
* you challenge people’s world view in a wiki
* Stepping backwards (ie. categories, they are really sophisticated taxonomies out there)
* Tech is poor
* lack of good tagging
* readability
* vandalism
* wordpress is much easier

## What is a wiki?

Core features to a wiki: participation – you meet sb via an edit, complete history about the changes => accountability, creates a sense of ownership
* primacy of authorship (people want their own spaces)
* Solo-isolation of content
* People don’t get it, wikis are full of pdfs
* You can’t see how it works compared to blogs, twitter. You instantly see how it works
* lack of trust (in content) & legitimacy in large orgs
* fear

## Why do wikis work?

* creative process
* Once sb gets over fear, people start participating
* Trainspotting phenomenon
* Wikis harness accuracy
* low entry barrier, 2 secs to edit
* I can create a structure that I want

## Sidetrack Wikipedia: Why Wikipedia is going to fail?

The correct question is if it is going to fail before it is fixed?
* Achievements: WP build a comprehensive database about academic journals
* Since wp, I am frustrated that I can’t edit Sydney Morning Herald online
* Success of WP was good PR
# University of Canberra/RCC2011/Participants
## Participants

* Laura Hale - University of Canberra
* Leigh Blackall - University of Canberra
* Jutta von Dincklage - Cancer Council Australia
* Rob Fitzgerald - University of Canberra
* John Vandenberg - Wikimedia Australia, University of New England
* Jani Patokallio - Lonely Planet
* Rose Grozdanic - Australian Flexible Learning Framework
* Michael Coghlan - TAFESA, NewLearning
* Kirsty Sharp - Tasmanian Polytechnic
* Tom Worthington - Australian National University
* Diane Phillips - University of Canberra
* MarkDilley - AboutUs
* SatuSuro - Wikipedia editor - Western Australia
* Chriswaterguy - Wikipedian & co-founder of Appropedia
* Adam Jenkins - University of South Australia
* Billinghurst - no organisation - Fri - Sat for parts of days, ?Sun.
* Marghanita da Cruz - Ramin Communications - definitely attending all day Friday
* Stephan Ridgway - Sydney - Travelling down Friday, definitely attending Sat. and Sun Morning
* Robyn Jay - Free
* James Neill - University of Canberra - attending all day Friday
* Ken - Lonely Planet
* Mark Spain
# University of Canberra/RCC2011/Printing books out of wikis

The Printing books session was attended by Leigh Blackall, John Vandenberg, Jani Patokallio, Jutta and .. ?
..Leigh talked about the use of Wiki books at University of Canberra..
John mentioned that the mediawiki extensions which automatically produce books hasnt been used widely on Wikisource, as their community tends to want to have more control over the layout than is currently possible. One example of the issues with using the mediawiki tools on Wikisource is the inability to control headers, footers, and page breaks so that the new edition is similar to the original edition, which can be important where the original page number should be retained in reprints in order to be useful.
The discussion turned to looking at ways that the existing rendering software (mw:Extension:Collection) can be improved to improved, and also how to increase the options available for printing.
One of the key issues raised was the lack of a manual editing phase in the mediawiki software. Currently the book sent to the printer (PediaPress) is only the wiki pages, which is a limitation for a number of reasons. Several examples of why a manual editing phrase is desirable included
* front-matter
* fine tuning the layout to give a more professional feel
* additional content which is only useful for the audience of one printed edition and not desired in the online edition which is also used by other audiences.
With this in mind, the participants discussed LaTeX and OpenDocument formats as options for this editing stage. As the Collection extension allows a wiki book to be exported as an OpenDocument file, this format is a natural choice. However OpenDocument files can not be uploaded to Commons, and can not be sent to a Printery electronically as easily as a collection of wiki pages can be sent to PediaPress. Once the OpenDocument leaves the wiki, it can't come back except as a finished PDF, which reduces collaboration opportunities.
Also discussed was whether it would be useful to have an open system that allows documents stored on a wiki to be electronically sent from mediawiki to any printery. An example of where it might be useful is if the Australian university printeries allowed electronic submissions, university staff and students could print books at their university printery, which may be cheaper and could reduce the turn around time.
Proposals:
* Proposal to offer bounties for improved OpenDocument support
* Proposal to add printer support to mediawiki
# Review some facts about DNS
## Learning goals
## Script

Web Science/Part1: Foundations of the web/Domain Name System/Review some facts about DNS/script
# Web Science/New here

* PART1: Week1: Ethernet · Internet Protocol · Week2: Transmission Control Protocol · Domain Name System · Week3: Internet vs world wide web · HTTP · Week4: Web Content · Dynamic Web Content
* PART2: Week5: How big is the Web? · Descriptive Web Models · Week6: Advanced Statistic Models · Modelling Similarity · Week7: Generative Modelling of the Web · Graph theoretic Web Modelling
* PART3: Week8 : Investigating Meme Spreading · Herding Behaviour · Week9: Online Advertising · User Modelling
* PART4: Week10 : Copyright · Net neutrality · Week11: Internet governance · Privacy
* What is a MOOC and what will this course on Web science be about?
* Why open educational resources matter.
* What is a MOOC?
* What is a web science unMOOC?
* Course Content
* Steffen Staab introduces the importance of Web Science
* Discussion with Steffen Staab on what Web Science is
| Title (associated wikiproject) | Topic | Date | Time | Audience |
| Editing basics: citing sources, part 1 | Text formatting | 2010-10 | 2:03 | Beginner |
| Editing basics: boldness and links | Text formatting | 2010-10 | 3:37 | Beginner |
| How to start a sandbox article | Article creation | 2010-09 | 2:11 | Beginner |
| How to use talk pages | Collaboration | 2011-02 | 2:30 | Beginner |
| How to use watchlists | Collaboration | 2011-01 | 2:10 | Beginner |
| How to add an image | Images | 2010-09 | 1:25 | Beginner |
| How to use bold and italics | Text formatting | 2010-09 | 0:55 | Beginner |
| How to make a wikilink | Text formatting | 2020-11 | 1:24 | Beginner |
| Uploading files to Wikimedia Commons (using the Upload Wizard) | Images | 2011-03 | 2:48 | Beginner |
| Category explanation and how to use the HotCat gadget (WikiProject Categories) | Categories | 2010-03 | 5:45 | Intermediate |
| How to create a Wikipedia article - Right to science and culture | Article creation | 2010-02 | 8:15 | Intermediate |
| The steps in creating a user account on the English Wikipedia | New account | 2008-12 | 2:40 | Beginner |
# DNS address resolution
## Learning goals
## Script

Web Science/Part1: Foundations of the web/Domain Name System/DNS address resolution/script
# Delegating DNS queries
## Learning goals
## Script

Web Science/Part1: Foundations of the web/Domain Name System/Delegating DNS queries/script
# WikiJournal of Science/Associate editors/Application
## Associate editor application of

Areas of expertise:
Relevant experience:
    Professional -
    Publishing -
    Open -
I confirm that I will act in accordance with the policies of the WikiJournal of Science. ~~

## Use

Above is a draft that preloads when someone wishes to apply to be an associate editor. It can be invoked with the link below:
   https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Special:NewSection/Talk:WikiJournal_of_Science/Associate_editors&preload=WikiJournal_of_Science%2FAssociate_editors%2FApplication
# Wikimania/2008

Wikimania 2008

## Presentations

* all videos?
* some videos and Collaborative research in Wikiversity by User:Cormaggio
* videos best for Internet Explorer

## Panels

Open educational resources and globalization

## Location controversy

* Location of Wikimania 2008 creates controversy by User:DragonFire1024.
* Wikimania 2008: opportunity or outrage? - m:User:Llywrch
# Wikimania/2012

See Wikimania 2012 for details of this event:
Wikimania 2012 will be the 8th annual Wikimedia Conference. It will be held in Washington, D.C. on July 12–15, 2012.