OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Wikineighborhoods

The Wikineighborhoods project is a learning project at Wikiversity to both collaboratively document the neighborhoods of New York City, and to provide new avenues of civic cooperation and engagement for city residents.

## Partnership

This initiative is a three-way partnership between Wikimedia New York City, Connecting.nyc, and Internet Society of New York.
This is an extension of the dotNeighborhoods effort for the creation of viable content for future community-run websites for each of the neighborhoods of New York City, to be developed along the "wiki model", as seen in Wikipedia/Wikimedia projects and city wiki efforts.
Work for this project will also be done in the context of the Wiki Center at LaGuardia Community College Library/ CUNY.

## Process

For this pilot project at Wikiversity we are developing community resources for 10 neighborhoods (2 for each of the five boroughs), with project planning taking place here at Wikiversity. The project implementation will take place at an independent .org domain. With a proof of concept, the WikiNeighborhoods information will move within the .nyc TLD upon its activated as New York City's top-level domain.

### Suggested Names for Pilot Site

Until the .nyc TLD becomes available, perhaps in late 2011 or more likely 2012, we need a website to branch off the various neighborhoods. A decision on this name will be made on June 23. Suggestions are welcome.
nycneighborhoods.org
nycneighborhoods.net
nyc-neighborhoods.net
nyc-neighborhoods.org

### Miscellaneous Suggestions

Some suggestions from JZ -
Developments related to your dot + Wiki-hoods
http://blog.everyblock.com/2009/jun/30/source/ http://www.knightfoundation.org/news/press_room/knight_press_releases/detail.dot?id=349973 http://www.resourceshelf.com/2010/06/19/new-zip-code-maps-mashup/
Throw in Ushahidi.com into the mix (uses FrontlineSMS.com) and you have mobile SMS + online mapping + zip code news feeds/feedback which could help engage more local participation and an interesting new world opens up...

### Pilot neighborhoods

* WikiNeighborhoods/Harlem
* WikiNeighborhoods/Park Slope
* WikiNeighborhoods/Jackson Heights
# Wikipedia/Suggested essays
## Suggested essays in social science

* Carry out a questionnaire or an interview survey, for example regarding:
** To what extent is it considered acceptable to use Wikipedia as source in student essays?
** To what extent does systematic bias exist on Wikipedia?
** What causes subjective enforcement of the Wikipedia policies?
** What measures are most efficient in improving the reliability of Wikipedia?
* Arrange a blind test measurement of the quality of a certain Wikipedia language version in comparison to a commercial encyclopedia
* Carry out a case study, evaluating the success of some wiki site.
* Study Wikipedia statistics
* Write a review paper on a few research articles or some master theses related to wikis and Wikipedia, compare their conclusions and argue for your own opinion on the matter

## Suggested technical projects in computer science

* Install, configure, administrate and build up your own wiki
* Evaluate some new MediaWiki extension or application
* Program a MediaWiki robot script
* Suggest and specify the development of some new MediaWiki application or extension, and develop a first prototype or demonstrator
* Write a review paper on some technical research articles or a Master of Science theses related to wiki technology.
# Wikinews

Wikinews is a free-content news source wiki and a project of the Wikimedia Foundation. Wikinews allows anyone to report news on a wide variety of subjects. Its mission, as stated on the main page of the English version, is to "create a diverse environment where citizen journalists can independently report the news on a wide variety of current events".
Unlike other Wikimedia sister projects, Wikinews contents are mostly available under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 or later.

## Contents

* Wikinews/How to write a Wikinews article

## Projects for collaboration between Wikiversity and Wikinews

Wikiversity and Wikinews services:
* Wikinews and Wikipedia services
* Wikiversity:Reports
* Wikimania
# Wikipedia/Quizzes

This page contains multiple-choice self-tests that are part of the Wikiversity course about Wikis and Wikipedia. First read the relevant Wikipedia learning resources.

### Wikipedia policies and guidelines

This multiple choice self-test is related to the five pillars and to the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia.

## Wikipedia criticism

This multiple-choice self-test is related to the Criticism of Wikipedia and Reliability of Wikipedia.
# Wikimedian Demographics/Zambia

This subpage is for developing surveys and other discussions about Zambia

## Available Surveys

* (none currently)

## Related surveys

* (none suggested yet)

## Requested additional questions:

Surveys have been requested for the topics listed below:
* (none currently)

## Surveys under construction

These surveys are under development:
* (none currently)

## Related topics in Wikimedian Demographics

* (none suggested yet)

## Related topics on Wikiversity

* (none suggested yet)

## Survey Announcement Forums

New surveys will be announced < regular date >:

### Wiki-based forums

* (none suggested yet)

### Mailinglist and IRC forums

* (none suggested yet)

### Talkpage mailer bots

* (none suggested yet)

### Other forums

* (none suggested yet)
# Wikinews/How to write a Wikinews article

Well, the first thing you have to think, is "Is my article really news?". Please check too if it hasn't been created yet.

## Some steps to follow

Create the article. This tool will be helpful for your proposes.
Leave the {{date thing that way. It'll put the date automatically. Under that, you can start writing your article. There are also infoboxes for certain things, like {{Chile}}, {{Politics and conflicts}}, etc. They are put over {{date}}, which categorizes your article with the date of publish.
Your article should look like this:
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi. Nam liber tempor cum soluta nobis eleifend option congue nihil imperdiet doming id quod mazim placerat facer possim assum. Typi non habent claritatem insitam; est usus legentis in iis qui facit eorum claritatem. Investigationes demonstraverunt lectores legere me lius quod ii legunt saepius. Claritas est etiam processus dynamicus, qui sequitur mutationem consuetudium lectorum. Mirum est notare quam littera gothica, quam nunc putamus parum claram, anteposuerit litterarum formas humanitatis per seacula quarta decima et quinta decima. Eodem modo typi, qui nunc nobis videntur parum clari, fiant sollemnes in futurum.

## Sources

* "The trololo" – Lolol, May 19, 2010
* "Typi non habent claritatem insitam" – Someone, May 19, 2010
* "Rickroll alcanza apogeo" – La Tercera, April 1, 2009 ((Spanish))

### Code

Try to use HotCat, and it will give you suggestions to which categories to add. Maybe you know this one, it's the same as Wikipedia's :) You may consider to put {{developing}} at the top, while writing your article. You must add at least 2 sources for the article.
Once you are done, add {{review}} or click the [change] button in the developing box. Then, you'll have to wait until some Reviewer reviews your article.
Wikinews, contrary to Wikipedia, accepts Original Research, but you must prove you are reliable. It must pass a Neutral point of view and meet the content guidelines. If something is 2-3 days old, it will be most likely deleted.
# WikipediaOS/Self-interested participants
## Hypothesis

Even in voluntary communities like Wikipedia or OS development some people contribute or play a role due to motivations more connected to third parties than the community itself, like corporate interests.

## Votes/comments

* Support While private or for-profit initiatives find ways sometimes to be represented in Wikipedia articles for improving their prestige or traffic to their websites, in OS software this kind of alliances and interests tend to be more transparent. --Esenabre 20:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

## HowTo vote/comment

You can comment or help to evaluate this research question by using these tags:
* {{agree}} makes I agree
* {{disagree}} makes I disagree because
* {{comment}} makes Comment
If you are not signed in, please include your name to help other participants know what name to refer to you by.
# WikipediaOS/Task specialization
## Hypothesis

Different tasks among wikipedians (wikigardening, adding external resources, proofreading, programming boots, etc) is equivalent to the same type of specialization among contributors in the development of free source software (adding code, testing programs, correcting bugs, translating, improving usability, etc).

## Votes/comments

* Support For me is one of the more clear similarities between Wikipedia and OS development, since it represents and its probably the key of wide participation (a wide offer of thing to do, for so many different people and skills) --Esenabre 22:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

## HowTo vote/comment

You can comment or help to evaluate this research question by using these tags:
* {{agree}} makes I agree
* {{disagree}} makes I disagree because
* {{comment}} makes Comment
If you are not signed in, please include your name to help other participants know what name to refer to you by.
# WikipediaOS/Release early, release often
## Hypothesis

Quick processes of development guarantee the possibility of growing articles and programs with the help of many participants. They have this way the opportunity to watch and/or test improvements or mistakes in non definitive versions, then solve them directly or by notifying other active members of the community.

## Votes/comments

* Support Alpha, Beta and other software release life cycle indicators could be understand equivalent to stages of articles ("to be expanded", "needs citation", etc) --Esenabre 15:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
* Comment Agree with the wiki part, also that software should be released early to minimize not detecting important problems (verification vs. validation). One problem with too many releases can be: losing trust, because customers thinking why do they do this often, so buggy? Of course it can show an active development, but well... In the end it depends how one communicates this to the outside (e.g. software development process being used, marketing, ...) ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat 18:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

## HowTo vote/comment

You can comment or help to evaluate this research question by using these tags:
* {{agree}} makes I agree
* {{disagree}} makes I disagree because
* {{comment}} makes Comment
If you are not signed in, please include your name to help other participants know what name to refer to you by.
# Wikipedia Course

Wikipedia Course
Required: Create an Account on Wikipedia and Login
Topics Covered:
* How to use a Sandbox
* How to add an infobox
* How to edit information in an infobox
* How to add links to other articles
# Wikipedia and the 2008 US elections/Barack Obama

Barack Obama :
| Subject type: | Candidate, now president |
| Creation date: | 18 March, 2004 |
| First notability: | tbd |
| Article edits: | tbd |
| Talk page edits: | tbd |
| Days protected (sysop only): | tbd |
| Days protected (autoconfirmed): | tbd |

## Article history

The Barack Obama article began on 18 March, 2004, created by an unregistered editor. The article was edited a total of 335 times during 2004.
In 2005, the article was edited 461 times.
In 2006, the article was edited times.
In 2007, there were edits.
In 2008, there were edits.
In January, 2009, there were edits.

## Basic questions

* was the article started as a stub? if so, how long did it take to lose the stub tag?
* did wikipedia have an article on the subject before the election? if so, compare the article before and after
* were daughter articles created? if so, when? were all of the daughter articles kept?
* what was the relationship between talk page edits and article edits?
* were there edit wars? if so, what were they about, and did they coincide with campaign events?
* was the article protected or placed under probation? if so, why and for how long?
* did the campaigns themselves edit the articles?
* was the article itself ever in the news?

## Timeline

Development needed for a timeline with edits by day, week, or month, sorted by:
* anon, user, and sysop
* content edits, minor edits (copyedits and so on), reverted edits, vandal edits, reverted vandal edits
* mark major campaign events on the timeline to see if there is any correlation between number of edits and news events
# WikipediaOS/Possibility of forking
## Hypothesis

Projects may be forked from the original development team without prior permission, resulting in a distinct piece of software or content that initially had the same structure.

## Votes/comments

* Support In FLOSS and Wikipedia related projects individual dissatisfaction is transformed into group-level dissatisfaction only occasionally, but here we should consider also forking as something more modular and less "traumatic" like when an article needs disambiguation after along period of two meanings in a single page or when a program or app requires minimum modifications for fitting in other systems (for example a browser extension).
* Support Wikiversity uses forking when users cannot agree on page content after a reasonable attempt. Forking on Wikiversity should be handled with a disambiguation page (or overall subject page) that treats the forks equally and fairly, that is, the diambiguation page should enjoy maximum consensus. The purpose of forking here is to avoid useless controversy and dissension; a university may have more than one class on a controversial topic, and the teachers/students may have different points of views. In mainspace, pages should be fully neutral, eventually. But subpages may be biased, and various means may be used to ensure that students are not misled as to, for example, mainstream scientific opinion, or, in the other direction, by unfair presentation of fringe concepts. When subpages fully express a POV, such that those who hold the POV will agree, "this is what we believe," then work can begin on constructing metapages that fairly summarize; the most reliable sign of NPOV is that all participants agree on the text. That goal may not always be realizable, but it is always desirable, and true consensus is worth pursuing, but subpages allow full expression without struggle. --Abd 14:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
* Comment Perhaps fits here: frustration, unhappiness leads to ... though it refers to OS, some readers could adopt this certainly to other things around here :-)
** "...and all four of the distros discussed here were frustrated with their efforts at trying to contribute to the projects that had come before them. Ultimately, the story behind our myriad Linux distributions is like that of Linux itself: each was started by the most pragmatic kind of dreamer who could visualize a better way and had the talent and drive to make that vision real."
** "... stir lightly, bake for 19 years, and you get 452 different meals." ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat 18:38, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

## How to vote/comment

You can comment or help to evaluate this research question by using these tags:
* {{agree}} makes I agree
* {{disagree}} makes I disagree because
* {{comment}} makes Comment
If you are not signed in, please include your name to help other participants know what name to refer to you by.
# WikipediaOS/Reusing of sources
## Hypothesis

Copy and paste task and practices speed up productive tasks, that require afterwards peer revision and adaptations for new purposes and functions.

## Votes/comments

* Comment about "Is common practice (specially in non English Wikipedias) to begin articles with translations form the English one (that later on could begin to acquire its own local or cultural perspective)." My experience from German Wikipedia: when "just" translated from en.WP: articles are not welcomed at de.WP (but e.g. translated from de.WP to en.WP that was ok) ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 14:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

## HowTo vote/comment

You can comment or help to evaluate this research question by using these tags:
* {{agree}} makes I agree
* {{disagree}} makes I disagree because
* {{comment}} makes Comment
If you are not signed in, please include your name to help other participants know what name to refer to you by.
# Arithmatic operation/Addition
## Addition

Addition is a mathematical operation that represents combining collections of objects together into a larger collection. It is signified by the plus sign (+)
For example, in the picture on the right, there are 3 + 2 apples—meaning three apples and two other apples—which is the same as five apples. Therefore, 3 + 2 = 5. Besides counting fruits, addition can also represent combining other physical and abstract quantities using different kinds of numbers: negative numbers, fractions, irrational numbers, vectors, decimals and more.
Addition follows several important patterns. It is commutative, meaning that order does not matter, and it is associative, meaning that when one adds more than two numbers, order in which addition is performed does not matter (see Summation). Repeated addition of 1 is the same as counting; addition of 0 does not change a number. Addition also obeys predictable rules concerning related operations such as subtraction and multiplication. All of these rules can be proven, starting with the addition of natural numbers and generalizing up through the real numbers and beyond. General binary operations that continue these patterns are studied in abstract algebra. Performing addition is one of the simplest numerical tasks. Addition of very small numbers is accessible to toddlers; the most basic task, 1 + 1, can be performed by infants as young as five months and even some animals. In primary education, children learn to add numbers in the decimal system, starting with single digits and progressively tackling more difficult problems. Mechanical aids range from the ancient abacus to the modern computer, where research on the most efficient implementations of addition continues to this day. Addition is reverse process of subtraction. Even in subtraction, addition is done using negation of all elements except the first one.

## Operation

    $A+B=C$
Where
    $A$
    $B$
    $C$

## Addition Rule

* Commutative Law: $a+b=b+a$ .
* Associative Law: $(a+b)+c=a+(b+c)$ .
* Additive Identity: $a+0=a$ .
* Additive Inverse: $a+(-a)=0$ .
# Arithmetic mean/Program/Natural memory unit/Exercise

Write a computer-program (pseudocode) which computes the arithmetic mean of two given non negative rational numbers.
The initial configuration is
    $(a,b,c,d,0,0,0,\ldots )$
with $b,d\neq 0$. Here $a/b$ and $c/d$ represent the rational numbers from which we want to compute the arithmetic mean. The result should be printed (in the form numerator denominator) and then the program shall stop.
# Arithmetic and geometric mean/Estimate/Exercise

Let $x$ and $y$ be two non-negative real numbers. Prove that the arithmetic mean of these numbers is larger than or equal to their geometric mean.
# BCP/Euphorbia maculata

Euphorbia maculata
| flowers and foliage Wikipedia • Commons • Wikibooks (horticulture) • Wikibooks (subject) • Wikispecies • Fruit and seed clock | Profile for Euphorbia maculata (Creeping Spurge) Identifying Characteristics Recent Logs --SB_Johnny | 07:49, 4 August 2007 (photolog) --SB_Johnny | 10:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC) --SB_Johnny | 13:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC) --SB_Johnny | 11:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC) (view all logs) |
Global data:
Regional data: Southeastern Pennsylvania: (native) July, August, September, October
Additional images:
# BCP/Euphorbia lathyris

Euphorbia lathyris
| Flowering plant Wikipedia • Commons • Wikibooks (horticulture) • Wikibooks (subject) • Wikispecies • Fruit and seed clock | Profile for Euphorbia lathyris (Caper Spurge) Identifying Characteristics Recent Logs SB_Johnny May 15 2007 (from photographs) --SB_Johnny | 10:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC) --SB_Johnny | 11:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC) --SB_Johnny | 10:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC) --SB_Johnny | 09:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC) --SB_Johnny | 08:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC) --SB_Johnny | 09:07, 20 July 2008 (UTC) --SB_Johnny 09:05, 16 August 2008 (UTC) (view all logs) |
Global data: Temperate zone season(s): Late Spring, Early Summer, Mid Summer, Early Winter
Regional data: Southeastern Pennsylvania: (invasive or naturalized) May, June, July, August, December
Additional images:
# BCP/Euphorbia maculata/Logs

This page contains recent bloom logs for Euphorbia maculata (Creeping Spurge). If you saw this plant blooming today (or sometime within the last 3 days), you can help improve the bloom clock by logging it. Just click on "edit" next to the Recent Logs heading, add *~~~~ (an asterisk followed by four tildes) on a new line just below the last signature, and then click "save page". This will add your signature and the date to log the plant.
Please make sure you've signed up on the contributors' page so that we can know the location of the plant you saw blooming and use your contribution to create a flora for your region! When you're done, you can go back to one of the main pages and find logs of other flowers you might have seen today.

### Logs
#### 2008 Logs

* (no archived logs yet)

##### Recent Logs

* --SB_Johnny | 07:49, 4 August 2007 (photolog)
* --SB_Johnny | 10:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
* --SB_Johnny | 13:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
* --SB_Johnny | 11:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
# BCP/Euthamia graminifolia

Euthamia graminifolia
| Flowering plant Wikipedia • Commons • Wikibooks (horticulture) • Wikibooks (subject) • Wikispecies • Fruit and seed clock | Profile for Euthamia graminifolia (Grass-leaves goldenrod) Identifying Characteristics Habit:erect, clump-forming forbFlowers:flat-topped terminal clusters of small yellow heads Recent Logs --SB_Johnny | 13:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC) SB Johnny-LM 09:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC) --SB_Johnny | 14:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC) --SB_Johnny | 12:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC) (a few still flowering) --SB_Johnny | 10:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC) (last 2 weeks) --SB_Johnny 18:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC) (view all logs) |
Global data:
Regional data: Southeastern Pennsylvania: (native) July, August, September, October
Additional images:
# BCP/Eupomatia laurina

In Bloom Annandale, 11am, 6pm 23 November 2010, about 13.15 24 November 2010 and 15.30 4 December 2010 http://ramin.com.au/travel/eupomatia-laurina-annandale-23nov2010.shtml
# BCP/Fagopyrum esculentum

Fagopyrum esculentum
| Flowers and foliage Wikipedia • Commons • Wikibooks (horticulture) • Wikibooks (subject) • Wikispecies • Fruit and seed clock | Profile for Fagopyrum esculentum (Buckwheat) Identifying Characteristics Habit:erect herbaceous plantFoliage:cordate, alternateLife Cycle: annual Recent Logs --SB_Johnny | 08:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC) --SB_Johnny | 12:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC) --SB_Johnny | 13:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC) (view all logs) |
Global data:
Regional data: Southeastern Pennsylvania: (cultivated) July, September, October
Additional images: