OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Survey design/Workshop/Instructor notes
## 2012

Orientation Week, Wed 9:30-12:30

### Introductions

* 13:30-14:00

### Pt 1 - Survey research

* 14:00-14:45

### Pt 2 - Survey design

* 15:00-15:45

### Pt 3 - Survey critique

* 16:00-16:30

## 2011

Orientation Week, Tuesday 10:00 - 15:00
These notes provide a rough outline of how the f2f workshop was structured and delivered in 2011.

### Instructor/participants

This was the third time Jtneill had provided the workshop. Participants were typically international and domestic PhD students from a wide variety of fields, including Business and Government and Health and Medical Sciences. Students were generally in the early stages of developing PhD proposals or in the process of ethics applications, survey design and data collection.
There were 20 enrolments (full) with about 12 shows before lunch and about 7 shows after lunch (in part due to a competing session about how to complete an ethics application - this clash should be avoided if possible). In future, the class could be over-enrolled e.g., to 30 to help accommodate more students. The room has 23 computers, but could accommodate even up to 30.

### Materials

Some slides were culled and reorganised for 2011 (e.g., to include levels of measurement earlier - good). But more should be culled - basically all slides after the lunch break are unnecessary for the workshop.
A single-page handout with the workshop name, instructor contact details, timeline and links and logins would be useful in future.
It would also be desirable to contact all participants approximately 1 week beforehand to provide a link to the workshop website, links to recommended readings, and a request to bring along electronic or hard copies of any draft surveys.

### Introductions

* 10:00 - 10:30
* Have participants add name tags during introductions
* Each participant to share briefly the three things listed, but the facilitator should generally ask for some educative additional/elaborative material from each participant e.g.,
** Name, Institution
** Field, Topic, Research Question, Hypotheses
** Type of survey design
** Stage of development for survey questions
** Issues, Questions, Hopes/Goals for Workshop
* Create a whiteboard map of the room each person's name and survey topic and workshop goals.

### Part 1: Survey research

* 10:30 - 11:15
* See slides

### Break

* 11:15 to 11:30

### Part 2: Survey design

* 11:30 to 13:15
* See slides

### Lunch

* 13:15 to 14:00
* An extra 15 mins would be better
* Copy one or more draft surveys for critique from class

### Part 3: Survey critique

* 14:00 to 15:00
* Distribute surveys
* 15 mins to critique
* 45 mins to discuss

### Part 4: Questions/Discussion/Evaluation

* 15:00 to 15:30
# Tarheel Health Portal/Correlation between Socioeconomic status and Academic Achievement
## Class Structure in the United States

Income and wealth disparity between economic classes in the United States has substantially grown making it harder for individuals residing in the lower middle and working class divisions to obtain resources and allowing individuals residing in the upper class sector to not only obtain resources but also own them. Education is seen as the main source of social mobility but, the resource has become limited and
# Tarheel Health Portal/Example

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Morbi condimentum tempor cursus. Vestibulum rutrum eros ac odio sagittis vestibulum. Vestibulum tempor arcu non diam dapibus ornare. In elit erat, faucibus vitae ultricies vitae, viverra a enim. Vivamus efficitur pretium tincidunt. Proin pharetra, lorem sed ultrices tincidunt, nunc ipsum tincidunt arcu, quis egestas sem magna quis mi. Nulla facilisi. Nullam vestibulum eros eu metus rutrum, venenatis commodo mauris malesuada. Praesent nec enim sollicitudin, varius ipsum at, consectetur eros. Nunc tincidunt vitae erat id ullamcorper. Donec eget eros nec magna semper ultrices quis id dui. Sed ut vehicula magna. Donec sapien enim, iaculis in nibh at, accumsan feugiat nisi.
vermillion

## heading
### subsubheading

* bullet points

## heading

[Google]
mouse
mouse
Maecenas id rhoncus nunc. Suspendisse eget eros neque. Quisque vel mi mi. Aenean lobortis in enim quis viverra. In neque diam, facilisis eu metus id, varius malesuada sem. Mauris vestibulum, dolor et viverra tempus, neque tortor scelerisque risus, in aliquet quam velit at dui. Ut hendrerit, augue at venenatis consequat, eros ante convallis nulla, in pulvinar arcu elit eget augue. Vivamus posuere leo id ante congue, interdum malesuada neque varius. Nulla facilisi. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Etiam quis tellus vulputate purus feugiat ultricies eu quis neque.
Donec efficitur erat mi, vel blandit ipsum blandit nec. Sed tincidunt mollis feugiat. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Aliquam erat volutpat. Integer ut semper erat. Nam rhoncus quis quam sit amet congue. Sed id viverra eros. Fusce turpis erat, interdum et consequat at, aliquet eget ligula. Cras ultrices dui id dolor accumsan, non varius tortor ullamcorper. In vestibulum interdum tellus, ut sodales justo mattis sit amet. Mauris vulputate at turpis eu varius. Curabitur convallis sagittis cursus. Pellentesque aliquet ipsum urna, non rutrum libero rutrum in. Praesent metus tortor, hendrerit sit amet ante sed, ultricies faucibus leo. Suspendisse placerat mi vel scelerisque aliquet.
Sed vitae nibh eu purus malesuada pharetra. Phasellus quis eleifend

## Further Readings

[UNC Hospital Site for Hair Loss] You can continue to explain after the link.
# PlanetPhysics/Functor Categories

In order to define the concept of functor category , let us consider for any two categories Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \mathcal{\A}} and Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \mathcal{\A'}} , the class Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle '''M''' = [\mathcal{\A},\mathcal{\A'}]}
of all covariant functors from Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "http://localhost:6011/en.wikiversity.org/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathcal{\A}} to Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \mathcal{\A'}} . For any two such functors Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle F, K \in [\mathcal{\A}, \mathcal{\A'}]} , Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle F: \mathcal{\A} \rightarrow \mathcal{\A'}} and Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle K: \mathcal{\A} \rightarrow \mathcal{\A'}} , let us denote the class of all natural transformations from $F$ to $K$ by $[F,K]$. In the particular case when $[F,K]$ is a set one can still define for a small category Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \mathcal{\A}} , the set $Hom_{'''M'''}(F,K)$. Thus, cf. p. 62 in, when Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \mathcal{\A}} is a small category the `class' $[F,K]$ of natural transformations from $F$ to $K$ may be viewed as a subclass of the cartesian product Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \prod_{A \in \mathcal{\A}}[F(A), K(A)]} , and because the latter is a set so is $[F,K]$ as well. Therefore, with the categorical law of composition of natural transformations of functors, and for Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \mathcal{\A}} being small, Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle '''M''' = [\mathcal{\A},\mathcal{\A'}]} satisfies the conditions for the definition of a category , and it is in fact a functor category .
Remark : In the general case when Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \mathcal{\A}} is not small , the proper class Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle '''M''' = [\mathcal{\A}, \mathcal{\A'}]} may be endowed with the structure of a supercategory (defined as any formal interpretation of ETAS) with the usual categorical composition law for natural transformations of functors. Similarly, one can construct a meta-category defined as the supercategory of all functor categories .
# PlanetPhysics/Fundamental Groupoid Functors

\newcommand{\sqdiagram}[9]{Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "http://localhost:6011/en.wikiversity.org/v1/":): {\displaystyle \diagram #1 \rto^{#2} \dto_{#4}& \eqno{\mbox{#9}}} }

### Quantum Fundamental Groupoid

A quantum fundamental groupoid $F_{\mathbb {Q} }$ is defined as a functor $F_{\mathbb {Q} }:\mathbb {H} _{B}\to {\mathbb {Q} }_{G}$, where ${\mathbb {H} }_{B}$ is the category of Hilbert space bundles, and ${\mathbb {Q} }_{G}$ is the category of quantum groupoids and their homomorphisms.

### Fundamental groupoid functors and functor categories

The natural setting for the definition of a quantum fundamental groupoid $F_{\mathbb {Q} }$ is in one of the functor categories-- that of fundamental groupoid functors, Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle F_{\grp}} , and their natural transformations defined in the context of quantum categories of quantum spaces ${\mathbb {Q} }$ represented by Hilbert space bundles or `rigged' Hilbert (or Frech\'et) spaces ${\mathbb {H} }_{B}$.
Other related functor categories are those specified with the general definition of the fundamental groupoid functor , Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle F_{\grp}: '''Top''' \to \grp_2} , where Top is the category of topological spaces and Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_2} is the groupoid category.
A specific example of a quantum fundamental groupoid can be given for spin foams of spin networks, with a spin foam defined as a functor between spin network categories. Thus, because spin networks or graphs are specialized one-dimensional CW-complexes whose cells are linked quantum spin states, their quantum fundamental groupoid is defined as a functor representation of CW-complexes on `rigged' Hilbert spaces (also called Frech\'et nuclear spaces).
# PlanetPhysics/Fundamental Formulas of Physics
## Fundamental formulas of physics

A contributed topic in progress. (Please add both links and items, but please do not delete any of the existing items).
Fundamental formulas (or formulae) of Physics are pragmatically defined as those mathematical formulae that have a well-defined physical interpretation related to verifiable and reproducible physical experiments, and that are in use by the largest majority of physicists and mathematicians involved in both the practice and study of physics, and also its engineering applications. In short, fundamental formulas are the most important, essential mathematical formulae in Physics that have a well-understood physical content and interpretatation, which thus provide the basis for either specific areas of physics or general/ theories of Physics.

## Suggested outline:

* Basic mathematical formulas used in physics;
* Physical constants;
* Statistics and Probability theories;
* Nomograms;
* classical mechanics;
* Sound and Acoustics
* Geometric Optics;
* Electromagnetism;
* Electronics and applications
* Electrical engineering and telecommunications
* Nanoelectronics and Nanomaterials
* Netwon's theory of Gravitation
* photoelectric effect and Einstein's explanation/ formulae
* Solar photovoltaics
* Einstein's special relativity theory
* Einstein's General Relativity theory
* quantum mechanics;
* quantum field theories (QFT), TQFT and HQFT #quantum fields on a Lattice (QFL) and quantum theories on a lattice (QTL)
* Computational, theoretical physics #quantum logics and Quantum Logic Algebras
* Algebraic Quantum Field Theory #quantum automata and Quantum Computing
* Standard Model (SUSY)
* supersymmetry and supergravity theories
* radioactivity, Atomic and nuclear physics #Harmonic oscillator and coupled oscillators;
* fluid dynamics and Rheology;
* Kinetic theory of gases and Classical statistical mechanics #Molecular Physics, heat and Thermodynamics #quantum statistical mechanics (QS)
* High energy physics and Elementary particles #Ergodic systems Information theory and Irreversible Thermodynamics
* Mathematical Physics
* quantum electrodynamics (QED)
* Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
* quantum gravity (QG)
* Complex system dynamics (CSD)
* Chaotic Systems and Chaos
* Mathematical and theoretical biophysics #Semiconductors, Hall effect and Josephson effect #superconductivity and superconductors
* Crystal Lattices and Symmetry
* Paracrystals and paracrystal theory
* Noncrystalline materials and glasses #applied physics #Physical Mathematics and Physical Applied Mathematics
* Ax
* Ay
* Az
# PlanetPhysics/Fundamental Quantum Groupoid

\newcommand{\sqdiagram}[9]{Failed to parse (unknown function "\diagram"): {\displaystyle \diagram #1 \rto^{#2} \dto_{#4}& \eqno{\mbox{#9}}} }

#### Fundamental Groupoid Functors and Functor Categories

The natural setting for the definition of a quantum fundamental groupoid $F_{\mathbb {Q} }$ is in one of the functor categories-- that of fundamental groupoid functors, Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle F_{\grp}} , and their natural transformations defined in the context of quantum categories of quantum spaces ${\mathbb {Q} }$ represented by Hilbert space bundles or `rigged' Hilbert (or Frech\'et) spaces ${\mathbb {H} }_{B}$.
Other related functor categories are those specified with the general definition of the fundamental groupoid functor, Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle F_{\grp}: '''Top''' \to \grp_2} , where Top is the category of topological spaces and Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_2} is the groupoid category.
A specific example of a quantum fundamental groupoid can be given for spin foams of spin networks, with a spin foam defined as a functor between spin network categories. Thus, because spin networks or graphs are specialized one-dimensional CW-complexes whose cells are linked quantum spin states, their quantum fundamental groupoid is defined as a functor representation of CW-complexes on `rigged' Hilbert spaces (also called Frech\'et nuclear spaces).
# PlanetPhysics/Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus

Consider the sequence of numbers $\{f_{0},f_{1},...f_{N}\}$ and define the difference $\Delta f_{j}=f_{j}-f_{j-1}$. Now sum the differences and not that all but the first and last terms cancel:
$\sum \Delta f_{j}=(f_{1}-f_{0})+(f_{2}-f_{1})+(f_{3}-f_{2})+...+(f_{N-2}-f_{N-1})+(f_{N}-f_{N-1})=f_{N}-f_{0}$
In other words $\int _{a}^{b}df=f(b)-f(a)$. It seems obvious that,
$\int _{a}^{b}{\frac {df}{dx}}dx=\int df=f(b)-f(a)$
Changing variables:
$\int _{a}^{x}{\frac {df}{ds}}=\int df=f(x)-f(a)$
or as an indefinite integral:
$\int f'(x)dx=f(x)+C$

#### Converse

In other words, the integral of the derivative of a function is the original function. But what of the derivative of the integral? Let,
$g(x)=\int _{a}^{x}f(s)ds=\sum _{0}^{N}f_{j}\Delta x=\left(f_{0}+f_{1}+...+f_{N}\right)\Delta x$ where $f_{N}=f(x)$.
Here, we assume that all the intervals $\Delta x$ in the Riemann sum are equal. To find $g(x+\Delta x)$ we need to add one extra term to the Riemann sum:
$g(x+\Delta x)=\int _{a}^{x+\Delta x}f(s)ds$
       $=\sum _{0}^{N+1}f_{j}\Delta x=\underbrace {\sum _{0}^{N}f_{j}\Delta x} _{g(x)}+f_{N+1}\Delta x$.
$g(x+\Delta x)=g(x)+f(x+\Delta x)\Delta x$.
Rearrange this to obtain:
$f(x+\Delta x)\Delta x=g(x+\Delta x)-g(x)$
The original Planet Physics version still remains on the page as a hidden comment (visible in "edit" mode)
# PlanetPhysics/Fundamentals of Nuclear Physics
## Foundations of Physics with emphasis on Nuclear Physics

The following subsections are main topics relevant to the foundations of Physics, nuclear physics, and their current applications under development.
* Outline of physics
* particle physics
* Nuclear fusion
* Fusion power
* quarks
* gluons
* partons
* ITER
* Quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
* quantum mechanics (QED)
* quantum field theory (QFT)
* statistical mechanics
* molecular dynamics
* Thermodynamics
* Experimental Physics
* Related Research fields:
* Atomic, molecular, and optical physics
* Unsolved problems in physics
* X-ray Microscope
* 2D-FT NMRI and Spectroscopy
* Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry
* Biophysics
* Current research
# PlanetPhysics/Fundamental Physical Concepts
## Fundamental Concepts in Physics

* Space, $s$
* Time, $t$
* spacetime, $ST$
* reference system or Frame of Reference ($RS$)
* Motion
* Measurement
* observable #Universal constants: Planck's constant ($h$, the speed of light, $c$, gravitational constant, $G$; hyperfine constant, $e$; cosmological constant, $\lambda$; Boltzmann constant, $k$.
* Matter
* Mass
* Particle
* Elementary Particles and quarks #Energy: Conservation Laws, Hamiltonian operator, energy eigenvalues. eigenstates, Lagrangian, Photons/Electromagnetic radiation #Fields: Electromagnetic, magnetic, electrical; nuclear; gravitational; gauge fields; non-Abelian gauge fiel theory
* Gravity
* String/strings
* Oscillatory motion, Oscillation, Periodic and Quasi-periodic motions
* Wave
* Wave function, Hermitian operator, non-Hermitian operator, Super-operator, Prigogine Time operator
* Period of oscillation
* Frequency
* Oscillation
* Force
* Reaction force
* Interactions: strong interactions: quark-quark, quark-pair, quark-gluon, gluon-gluon interactions, etc; Electromagnetic Iiteractions; self-interaction; Electro-weak interactions;gravitational interactions and gravitons #Potential
* virtual particles
* Kinetics and dynamics, Chaotic Dynamics, Quantum Dynamics
* system: closed, open, dynamic; classical or Newtonian, mechanical, relativistic, Thermodynamic, quantum; simple, chaotic, complex, super-complex, ultra-complex, hyper-complex
* dynamical system #entropy, $S$
* Mechanical work #temperature #heat, $Q$
* Enthalpy, $H$
* Partition Function, $Z$
# Web Science/Templates:DiscussionBox

{{{{{1}}}}}
# Web Science/Seminar

* PART1: Week1: Ethernet · Internet Protocol · Week2: Transmission Control Protocol · Domain Name System · Week3: Internet vs world wide web · HTTP · Week4: Web Content · Dynamic Web Content
* PART2: Week5: How big is the Web? · Descriptive Web Models · Week6: Advanced Statistic Models · Modelling Similarity · Week7: Generative Modelling of the Web · Graph theoretic Web Modelling
* PART3: Week8 : Investigating Meme Spreading · Herding Behaviour · Week9: Online Advertising · User Modelling
* PART4: Week10 : Copyright · Net neutrality · Week11: Internet governance · Privacy
This page will include a list of seminar topics students can be responsible for.

## Mode

* The seminar will be a splitted block seminar.
* It consists of 3 Meetings.
* Students will prepare a poster and present the poster to a small group of other students.
* Every Meeting each student presents his poster twice.
* Presentations will take 15 Minutes + 5 Minutes for Q&A and change over.
* Students have the chance to improve their poster for the next meeting.
* besides the poster students have to prepare:
** a multiple choice quiz with questions about their poster
** a short abstract (half a page) that describes what the audience of the poster will have learned.

## Dates

* tba.

## Topics

* tba.
# Web Science/Templates:Lesson

* PART1: Week1: Ethernet · Internet Protocol · Week2: Transmission Control Protocol · Domain Name System · Week3: Internet vs world wide web · HTTP · Week4: Web Content · Dynamic Web Content
* PART2: Week5: How big is the Web? · Descriptive Web Models · Week6: Advanced Statistic Models · Modelling Similarity · Week7: Generative Modelling of the Web · Graph theoretic Web Modelling
* PART3: Week8 : Investigating Meme Spreading · Herding Behaviour · Week9: Online Advertising · User Modelling
* PART4: Week10 : Copyright · Net neutrality · Week11: Internet governance · Privacy
Quick Navigation: Video - Script - further Reading - Quiz - Discussion
Quick Navigation: Video - Script - further Reading - Quiz - Discussion
* Script for: {{{title}}}
* no script has been added to this page. be the first to do so by editing the source of this page and including a script= field to the lesson template
Quick Navigation: Video - Script - further Reading - Quiz - Discussion
* Discuss {{{title}}} with others
* {{{{{talk}}}}}
# Web Science/Templates:LessonTalk
## Join the discussion: Ask and questions and provide answers

* If you click the ask a question button you're question will appear at the bottom of this list.
* If you click the give an answer you will be able to provide an answer to the questions that have been asked so far.
# Web Science/Web Architecture and Web History

The goal is to understand the difference between the Internet and the Web and also understand the historical development of the internet and web technologies.

## historical moments

w:History_of_the_World_Wide_Web and w:World_Wide_Web#History could be of help

### important people

include this section? whom to include? Only technology people or also people that created commercial or open source products?

### military phase

* arpanet

### pre web

* goopher
* usenet
all pre web internet based technologies that where somewhat similar to the web built on closed architectures which was problematic.
# Web Science/Templates:Script

* PART1: Week1: Ethernet · Internet Protocol · Week2: Transmission Control Protocol · Domain Name System · Week3: Internet vs world wide web · HTTP · Week4: Web Content · Dynamic Web Content
* PART2: Week5: How big is the Web? · Descriptive Web Models · Week6: Advanced Statistic Models · Modelling Similarity · Week7: Generative Modelling of the Web · Graph theoretic Web Modelling
* PART3: Week8 : Investigating Meme Spreading · Herding Behaviour · Week9: Online Advertising · User Modelling
* PART4: Week10 : Copyright · Net neutrality · Week11: Internet governance · Privacy
* PART1: Week1: Ethernet · Internet Protocol · Week2: Transmission Control Protocol · Domain Name System · Week3: Internet vs world wide web · HTTP · Week4: Web Content · Dynamic Web Content
* PART2: Week5: How big is the Web? · Descriptive Web Models · Week6: Advanced Statistic Models · Modelling Similarity · Week7: Generative Modelling of the Web · Graph theoretic Web Modelling
* PART3: Week8 : Investigating Meme Spreading · Herding Behaviour · Week9: Online Advertising · User Modelling
* PART4: Week10 : Copyright · Net neutrality · Week11: Internet governance · Privacy
Learning unit containing this Script
No Script written yet. Please include one!
# Web Science/current learning units talk

* Tree Structure
* Terminology
* Zones
* Review some facts about DNS
* Delegating DNS Queries
* DNS Address Resolution
* Summary, Further readings & Homework
# Web Science/Templates:TopNavigation

* PART1: Week1: Ethernet · Internet Protocol · Week2: Transmission Control Protocol · Domain Name System · Week3: Internet vs world wide web · HTTP · Week4: Web Content · Dynamic Web Content
* PART2: Week5: How big is the Web? · Descriptive Web Models · Week6: Advanced Statistic Models · Modelling Similarity · Week7: Generative Modelling of the Web · Graph theoretic Web Modelling
* PART3: Week8 : Investigating Meme Spreading · Herding Behaviour · Week9: Online Advertising · User Modelling
* PART4: Week10 : Copyright · Net neutrality · Week11: Internet governance · Privacy
# Web Science/Web and Society

This is the last part of the web science mooc of particular interest could be http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/
# WikiJournal of Science/Submissions/Introduction to quantum mechanics

This article has been declined for publication by the WikiJournal user group.
It is archived below as a record. Discussion can be viewed here. update record on wikidata

## Introduction to quantum mechanics

Author: Parent article editors Field: Physics
# WikiJournal of Science/Submissions/Astronomical spectroscopy

This article has been declined for publication by the WikiJournal user group.
It is archived below as a record. Discussion can be viewed here. update record on wikidata

## Astronomical spectroscopy

Author: Parent article editors Field: Physics